Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2009/06/03 - Agenda Packet
~~ re }. 10500 Civic Center Drive ~ Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730-3801 City Office: (909) 477-2700 AGENDAS REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT BOARD CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETINGS 1gt and 3`d Wednesdays ~ 7:00 P.M. JUNE 3, 2009 MEMBERS MAYOR MAYOR PRO TEM COUNCIL MEMBERS Donald J. Kurth, M.D. L. Dennis Michael Rex Gutierrez Sam Spagnolo Diane Williams CITY MANAGER CITY ATTORNEY CITY CLERK Jack Lam, AICP James L. Markman Janice C. Reynolds ORDER OF BUSINESS CLOSED SESSION Tapia Conference Room............ 5:30 P.M. REGULAR MEETING Council Chambers ........................ 7:00 P.M. INFORMATION FOR THE PUBLIC ~~ ~NCHO CUCAMONGA TO ADDRESS THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, FIRE BOARD AND CITY COUNCIL The Agency, Fire Board and City Council encourage free expression of all points of view. To allow all persons to speak, given the length of the Agenda, please keep your remarks brief. If others have already expressed your position, you may simply indicate that you agree with a previous speaker. If appropriate, a spokesperson may present the views of your entire group. To encourage all views and promote courtesy to others, the audience should refrain from clapping, booing or shouts of approval or disagreement from the audience. The public may address the Agency, Fire Board or City Council by filling out a speaker card and submitting it to the City Clerk. The speaker cards are located on the wall at the back of the Chambers, at the front desk behind the staff table and at the City Clerk's desk. During "Public Communications," your name will be called to speak on any item listed or not listed on the aaenda in the order in which it was received. If as cart of vouraresentation. you would like to disalav auaro or vrsuar marenar, grease see me carry c;rerrc aerore me meerrng commences. it you are present to speaK on an "Advertised Public Hearing" item, your name will be called when that item is being discussed. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by the Chair, depending upon the number of individuals desiring to speak. The public communications period will not exceed one hour prior to the commencement of the business portion of the agenda. During this one hour period, all those who wish to speak on a topic contained in the business portion of the agenda will be given priority, and no further speaker cards for these business items (with the exception of public hearing items) will be accepted once the business portion of the agenda commences. Any other public communications which have not concluded during this one hour period may resume after the regular business portion of the agenda has been completed. Any handouts for the Agency, Fire Board or City Council should be given to the City Clerk for distribution. AGENDA BACK-UP MATERIALS Staff reports and back-up materials for agenda items are available for review at the City Clerk's counter, Public Library and on the City's website. A complete copy of the agenda is also available at the desk located behind the staff table during the Council meeting. LIVE BROADCAST Agency, Fire Board and Council meetings are broadcast live on Channel 3 for those with cable television access. Meetings are rebroadcast on the second and fourth Wednesdays of each month at 11:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m. The City has added the option for customers without cable access to view the meetings "on-demand" from their computers. The added feature of "Streaming Video On Demand" is available on the City's website at www.ci.rancho- cucamonga.ca.us/whatsnew.htm for those with Hi-bandwidth (DSUCable Modem) or Low-bandwidth (Dial-up) Internet service. The Agency, Fire Board and City Council meets regularly on the first and third Wednesday of the month at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers located at 10500 Civic Center Drive. Members of the City Council also sit as the Redevelopment Agency and the Fire District Board. Copies of the agendas and minutes can be found at http:JJwww.ci.rancho-cucamonga.ca.us If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk's office at (909) 477-2700. Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired. Please turn off all cellular phones and pagers while the meeting is in session. REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AND CITY COUNCIL AGENDA JUNE 3, 2009 A. 5:30 P.M. -CLOSED SESSION A1. Roll Call: Mayor Kurth Mayor Pro Tem Michael Councilmembers Gutierrez, Spagnolo and Williams CLOSED SESSION CALLED TO ORDER AS THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AND THE CITY COUNCIL. ~~ B. ANNOUNCEMENT OF CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S) ~ D1. LABOR NEGOTIATIONS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54954.2 TO GIVE JOHN GILLISON, DEPUTY CITY MANAGER AND PAMELA EASTER, ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER, DIRECTION IN REGARDS TO THE MEET AND CONFER PROCESS -RDA, City, Fire D2. CONFERENCE WITH PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF 9TH STREET AND MADRONE AVENUE LINDA D. DANIELS, RDA DIRECTOR, NEGOTIATING PARTY -RDA F. 1 CLOSED SESSION TO RECESS TO THE REGULAR REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AND CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS AT 7:00 P.M. IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS AT CITY HALL, LOCATED AT 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA. REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AND CITY COUNCIL AGENDA _ JUNE 3, 2009 2 G. REGULAR MEETING CALL TO ORDER - 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS THE REGULAR MEETINGS OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AND CITY COUNCIL WILL BE CALLED TO ORDER. IT IS THE INTENT TO CONCLUDE THE MEETINGS BY 10:00 P.M., UNLESS EXTENDED BY CONCURRENCE OF THE AGENCY, FIRE BOARD AND COUNCIL. G1. Pledge of Allegiance G2. Roll Call: Mayor Kurth Mayor Pro Tem Michael Councilmembers Gutierrez, Spagnolo and Williams H. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS H1. Recognition of Cindy Friend - 2009 Outstanding School Crossing Guard of the Year for the City of Rancho Cucamonga. H2. Announcement by the Rancho Cucamonga Police Department regarding the 2009 Special Olympic Torch Run scheduled for June 10, 2009. I. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS This is the time and place for the general public to address the Redevelopment Agency, Fire Protection District and City Council on any item listed or not listed on the agenda. State law prohibits the Agency, Fire Board, or City Council from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Agency, Fire Board, or City Council may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by the Chair, depending upon the number of individuals desiring to speak. All communications are to be addressed directly to the Agency, Fire Board or City Council, not to the members of the audience. This is a professional business meeting and courtesy and decorum are expected. Please refrain from any debate between audience and speaker, making loud noises, or engaging in any activity which might be disruptive to the decorum of the meeting. The public communications period will not exceed one hour prior to the commencement of the business portion of the agenda. During this one hour period, all those who wish to speak on a topic contained in the business portion of the agenda will be given priority, and no further speaker cards for these business items (with the exception of public hearing items) will be accepted once the business portion of the agenda commences. Any other public communications which have not concluded during this one hour period may resume after the regular business portion of the agenda has been completed. REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AND CITY COUNCIL AGENDA JUNE 3, 2009 ~~ .T. CONSENT CALENDAR -REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY _ ~~ The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non-controversial. They will be acted upon by the Agency at one time without discussion. Any item may be removed by an Agencymember for discussion. J1. Approval of Minutes: May 20, 2009 (Regular Meeting) J2. Approval of Check Register dated May 13 through May 26, 2009, for the total amount of $39, 711.03. J3. Approval of a Resolution Changing the Time of Closed Session. RESOLUTION NO. RA 09-010 A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DETERMINING THE DAYS, TIME AND PLACE OF REGULAR MEETINGS OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY J4. Approval to accept the bids received and award and authorize the execution of the contract in the amount of $452,450.00 to the apparent low bidder, Howard Ridley Company, Inc. (RA 09-008), and authorize the expenditure of a 10% contingency in the amount of $45,245.00 for the Civic Center Planter and Parking Structure Waterproofing, to be funded from Civic Center Reserve Funds, Acct. No. 2624801-5650/1705624-0 and appropriate $50,000.00 to Acct. No. 2624801-5650/1705624-0 from Civic Center Reserve Fund Balance. J5. Approval of a budget appropriation for the amount of $28,686,100 to be funded from Acct. No. 2620801-5620/0-1250 pursuant to a loan agreement between the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency and Northtown Housing Development Corporation for the construction of San Sevaine Villas. The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non-controversial. They will be acted upon by the Fire Board at one time without discussion. Any item may be removed by a Boardmember for discussion. K1. Approval of Minutes: May 20, 2009 (Regular Meeting) K2. Approval of Check Register dated May 13 through May 26, 2009, for the total amount of $69,446.34. K3. Approval to adopt an annexation map showing Assessor Parcel Number 0229-041-10, (San Sevaine Villas}, located on the southwest corner of Foothill Blvd., and Hickory Ave. (vacated}, proposed to be annexed into CFD 85-1. 3 2 3 8 9 12 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AND CITY COUNCIL AGENDA JUNE 3, 2009 RESOLUTION NO. FD 09-020 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACTING AS THE LEGISLATIVE BODY OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1, ADOPTING AN ANNEXATION MAP (ANNEXATION NO. 09-5) SHOWING PROPERTY PROPOSED TO BE ANNEXED TO COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1 K4. Approval to adopt a Resolution of Intention to Annex Territory referred to as Annexation No. 09-5 (APN: 0229-041-10, San Sevaine Villas), into Community Facilities District No. 85-1, specifying services provided, to set and specify the special taxes to be levied within the annexation territory and set a time and place for a public hearing related to the annexation. RESOLUTION NO. FD 09-021 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACTING AS THE LEGISLATIVE BODY OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO AUTHORIZE THE ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY (ANNEXATION NO. 09-5) TO COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1 K5. Adoption of a Resolution declaring results of a Special Election in Community Facilities District No. 85-1, Annexation No. 09-3 (Norwalk Blvd. Baptist Church -APN 1100-051-03) RESOLUTION NO. FD 09-022 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACTING AS THE LEGISLATIVE BODY OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1, DECLARING THE RESULTS OF A SPECIAL ELECTION IN COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1, ANNEXATION NO. 09-3 AND ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF SUCH PROPERTY TO COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1 K6. Approval of a Resolution Changing the Time of Closed Session. RESOLUTION NO. FD 09-023 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DETERMINING THE DAYS, TIME AND PLACE OF REGULAR MEETINGS OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS 14 16 18 27 28 31 32 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AND CITY COUNCIL AGENDA JUNE 3, 2009 L. CONSENT The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non-controversial. They will be acted upon by the Council at one time without discussion. Any item may be removed by a Councilmember for discussion. ~ L1. Approval of Minutes: May 20, 2009 (Regular Meeting) L2. Approval of Check Register dated May 13 through May 26, 2009, and payroll ending May 26, 2009, for the total amount of $3,840,810.80. L3. Approval to award the purchase of one (1) lot of IBM computer server equipment with maintenance from IBM Corporation, utilizing Western States Contracting Alliance (WSCA) contract number A63311, in the total amount of $61,949, to be funded as follows: $42,663 from Acct. No. 1 71 4001-521 5 (Computer Equipment/Technical Replacement Fund- O&M/Computer Equipment); $4,959 from Acct. No. 1714001-5300 (Contract Services); and $14,327 from Acct. No. 1714001-5605 (Capital Outlay-Computer Equipment). L4. Approval of a Resolution approving submittal of the funding request to the Department of Conservation, Division of Recycling for Beverage Container Recycling and Litter Reduction Activities. RESOLUTION NO. 09-091 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE SUBMITTAL OF THE FUNDING REQUEST TO THE DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION, DIVISION OF RECYCLING FOR BEVERAGE CONTAINER RECYCLING AND LITTER REDUCTION ACTIVITIES L5. Approval of Resolutions to accept the preliminary Engineer's Reports and announcing the City Council's intention to collect annual assessments within Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4 5, 6, 7 and 8 for Fiscal Year 2009110. NO INCREASE OF ASSESSMENT RATE IS PROPOSED. RESOLUTION NO. 09-092 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, FOR APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S REPORTS FOR STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 AND 8 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2009/10 -CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 09-093 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 AND 8 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2009110, PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972; AND ANNOUNCING A TIME AND PLACE FOR A PUBLIC HEARING 34 72 73 74 75 77 78 R A EDEVELOPMENT GENCY, FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AND 6 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA JUNE 3, 2009 ~~~. l G'U CAMONGA L6. Approval of Resolutions to accept the Preliminary Engineer's Reports and announcing the 173 City Council's intention to collect annual assessments within landscape Maintenance District Nos. 1, 2, 3A, 38, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10 for Fiscal Year 2009/10. NO INCREASE OF ASSESSMENT RATE IS PROPOSED. RESOLUTION NO. 09-094 176 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, FOR APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S REPORTS FOR LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1, 2, 3A, 36, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 AND 10 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2009110 RESOLUTION NO. 09-095 177 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1, 2, 3A, 3B, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 AND 10 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2009/10, PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972; AND ANNOUNCING A TIME AND PLACE FOR A PUBLIC HEARING L7. Approval of Resolutions to accept the Preliminary Engineer's Reports and announcing the 344 City Council's intention to collect annual assessments within Park and Recreation Improvement District No. PD-85 for Fiscal Year 2009/10. NO INCREASE OF ASSESSMENT RATE IS PROPOSED. RESOLUTION NO. 09-096 346 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, FOR APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S ANNUAL REPORT FOR PARK AND RECREATION IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. PD-85 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2009/10 RESOLUTION NO. 09-097 347 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN PARK AND RECREATION IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT (PD-85) FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2009110, PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972; AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO L8. Approval of Public Convenience or Necessity DRC2009-00334 - 7-ELEVEN, Inc: A request for a Public Convenience or Necessity determination for a Type 20 Off-Sale Beer and Wine 359 License for a proposed market to be located in an existing commercial center at the northwest corner of Milliken Avenue and 4th Street in the Mixed Use Residential (MUR) District, Subarea 18, located at 9638 Milliken Avenue - APN: 0210-581-04. Staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from CEQA review and qualifies as a Class 1 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15301. REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AND CITY COUNCIL AGENDA JUNE 3, 2009 RESOLUTION NO. 09-098 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A DETERMINATION OF PUBLIC CONVENIENCE OR NECESSITY FOR A TYPE 20 OFF-SALE BEER AND WINE LICENSE FOR A PROPOSED MARKET TO BE LOCATED IN AN EXISTING COMMERCIAL CENTER AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF MILLIKEN AVENUE AND 4T" STREET IN THE MIXED USE RESIDENTIAL (MUR) DISTRICT, SUBAREA 18, LOCATED AT 9638 MILLIKEN AVENUE; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 0210-581-04. L9. Approval of a Public Convenience or Necessity - DRC2009-00391 -Total Wine & More - A request for a Public Convenience or Necessity determination for a beer, wine and distilled spirits retailer which is seeking approval of both a Type 21 Off-Sale General and a Type 42 On-Sale Beer and Wine for Public Premises alcohol license for a site located within the Foothill Crossing commercial center on the east side of Day Creek Boulevard and south of Foothill Boulevard at 8201 Day Creek Boulevard in the Regionally Related Office/Commercial District (RRO/C) - APN:0229-021-78. Staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from CEQA review and qualifies as a Class 1 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15301. RESOLUTION NO. 09-099 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A DETERMINATION OF PUBLIC CONVENIENCE OR NECESSITY FOR A BEER, WINE AND DISTILLED SPIRITS RETAILER FOR THE ISSUANCE OF A TYPE 21 OFF-SALE GENERAL ABC LICENSE AND A TYPE 42 ON-SALE BEER AND WINE PUBLIC PREMISES ABC LICENSE FOR A SITE LOCATED WITHIN THE FOOTHILL CROSSING COMMERCIAL CENTER ON THE EAST SIDE OF DAY CREEK BOULEVARD AND SOUTH OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, LOCATED AT 8201 DAY CREEK BOULEVARD IN THE REGIONALLY RELATED OFFICE/COMMERCIAL DISTRICT (RRO/C) - APN: 0229-021-78 L10. Approval of a recommendation from the Park and Recreation Commission to approve a light variance requested for the Minor, Major, Junior, and Senior Divisions All-Star Tournament hosted by District 71 Little League during June 27 through July 23, 2009, at Heritage and Red Hill Community Parks. L11. Approval of Improvement Agreement, Improvement Securing and Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 3 for DRC2007-00455, located on the east side of Woodruff Place between Highland Avenue and Cotton Cloud Drive, submitted by the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints. RESOLUTION NO. 09-100 370 374 386 389 394 396 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR DRC2007-00455 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AND CITY COUNCIL AGENDA JUNE 3, 2009 RESOLUTION NO. 09-101 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 3 FOR DRC2007-00455 L12. Approval of Improvement Agreement, Improvement Securities and Monumentation cash deposit for Tract Map 16908, located on the north side of Arrow Route, west of Baker Avenue, submitted by Sycamore Urban Properties, LLC. RESOLUTION NO. 09-102 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES AND MONUMENTATION CASH DEPOSIT FOR TRACT 16908 L13. Approval of Development Impact Fee Deferral Agreement between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and Sella Victoria, LP (Developer/Owner) (CO 09-217) for the residential property described in Exhibit "A" of the agreement, generally located at the northwest corner of East Avenue and Miller Avenue and identified as Tract Map No. 17919 RESOLUTION NO. 09-103 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE DEFERRAL AGREEMENT L14. Approval to execute a 30-year Lease Agreement at the rate of $1.00/year with Cucamonga Valley Water District (CO 09-218) allowing for the installation and maintenance of their Central Collection Units at four City buildings in a cooperative effort to facilitate their new "fixed network meter reading system" project. L15. Approval and execution of a Common Use Agreement between the San Bernardino County Flood Control District (CO 09-219) and the City of Rancho Cucamonga for amulti-use trail system along Day Creek Channel and Deer Creek Channel. L16. Approval to accept the bids received, award and authorize the execution of a contract effective July 1, 2009 through June 30, 2010 with Republic ITS, Inc. (CO 09-220) of Novato, California, for the "Citywide Traffic Signal Maintenance" to be funded from Acct. No. 1176303-5300 (Measure "I)") and authorize the City Manager or his/her designee to adjust the spending limit of said contract on an as needed basis in accordance with the approved Public Works Services Department Signal Maintenance Budget Line Item 5300, and authorization to renew said contract upon mutual consent for additional one (1) year periods. 397 406 408 409 411 412 413 415 A R GENCY, EDEVELOPMENT FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AND 9 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA JUNE 3, 2009 RA1VC HO CU CAMONGA L17. Approval to accept bids received and award and authorize the execution of the contract in 417 the amount of $199,936.90 to the apparent low bidder, Silvia Construction, lnc. (CO 09- 221), and authorize the expenditure of a 10% contingency in the amount of $19,993.69 for the Banyan Street Pavement Rehabilitation from Beryl Street to Archibald Avenue, to be funded from Prop. 1 B Funds, Acct. No. 1194303-5650/1679194-0. L18. Approval of an addendum to Reimbursement Agreement (SRA-55) for reconstruction of 425 pavement and overlay reconstruction of median left turn lanes and traffic signal related improvements with development of Parcel Map 17818, submitted by Footchester Partners I, LLC, to be funded from Transportation Acct. No.1 1 24303-5650/1 026 1 24-0. RESOLUTION NO. 09-104 427 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AN ADDENDUM TO REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT (SRA-55) FOR RECONSTRUCTION OF PAVEMENT AND OVERLAY RECONSTRUCTION OF MEDIAN LEFT TURN LANES AND TRAFFIC SIGNAL RELATED IMPROVEMENTS L19. Approval to release Faithful Performance Bond No. 6369997, retained in lieu of a 428 Maintenance Guarantee Bond, in the amount of $4,647,187.00 for Upper Cucamonga Storm Drain Widening Improvements, Phases I and II Project, Contract No. 07-006. L20. Approval to release the Maintenance Guarantee Bond in the amount of $38,235.77 for the 430 Fiscal Year 2007/2008 Local Street Rehabilitation Slurry Seal Project, Contract No. 07-177. L21. Approval to accept Improvements, release the Faithful Performance Bond, accept a 432 Maintenance Bond, and file a Notice of Completion for improvements for Tract 16311, located on 6"' Street, Golden Oak Road and Hellman Avenue, submitted by Crestwood Corporation. RESOLUTION NO. 09-105 434 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 16311 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK L22. Approval of a Resolution Changing the Time of Closed Session. 435 RESOLUTION NO. 09-106 436 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DETERMINING THE DAYS, TIME AND PLACE OF REGULAR MEETINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL L23. Approval of Support for the Restorative Justice Center and the Cucamonga Valley Viticulture 438 Conservancy's efforts to create a Community Garden in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. A R EDEVELOPMENT GENCY, FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AND 10 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA JUNE 3, 2009 RANCHO CUCAMONGA L24. Approval of a resolution and a Program Supplement No. F58 to Administering Agency-State 440 Agreement for State Funded Projects No. 00229S between the State of California and the City of Rancho Cucamonga for the replacement of traffic signal controllers and cabinets at 20 locations on Foothill Boulevard. RESOLUTION NO. 09-107 442 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT NO. F58 TO ADMINISTERING AGENCY-STATE AGREEMENT FOR STATE FUNDED PROJECTS NO. 00229S BETWEEN THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA AND THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA M. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT The following items have been advertised and/or posted as public hearings as required by law. Items M1 8 M2 were continued from the May 20, 2009 Regular Meeting. M1. CONSIDERATION OF FIRST READING OF AN ORDINANCE CONTINUING THE 444 ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX RATES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2009/10 IN MELLO ROOS COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1. ORDINANCE NO. FD 48 (first reading) 446 AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE LEVY OF THE SPECIAL TAX IN MELLO-ROOS COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2009/10 M2. CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION CONTINUING THE ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX RATE TO BE LEVIED IN MELLO-ROOS COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-1 450 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2009/10 RESOLUTION NO. FD-019 452 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING THE ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-1 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2009/10 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AND CITY COUNCIL AGENDA JUNE 3, 2009 N. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS CITY COUNCIL The following items have been advertised and/or posted as public hearings as required by law. The Mayor will open the meeting to receive public testimony. N1. CONSIDERATION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT SUBSTANTIAL AMENDMENT AND FUNDING ALLOCATION TO THE 2008-2009 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN - DRC 2008-00217R -CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A review of the federally required substantial amendment to the currently approved Annual Action Plan, which includes the selection of CDBG-R projects, based on a new grant allocation of $275,195 funded through the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of Zoos. N2. l7KHIVl rUIVUIIVl7 HLLVI.HIIVIV r'VK t"IJI..HL TCHK LVUy-LUIV - URIiLVUy-VUJOO - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A review of the federally required Energy Efficiency and Conservation Strategy, which includes the selection of EECBG projects, based on a new grant allocation of $1,597,700 funded through the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009. The following items have no legal publication or posting requirements. 01. REQUEST TO INITIATE DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DRC2009-00414 -CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA: A request to amend the text for Development Code Sections 17.02 (Administration), 17.08 (Residential Districts), 17.10 (Commercial/Office Districts), 17.12 (Parking Regulations), and 17.30 (Industrial Districts) to add a definition and standards for Community Gardens. Staff has determined that the project is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Section 15061(b)(3). 02. SCHOOL DISTRICT. 03. APPROVAL TO MAINTAIN LEVY FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-2 (DRAINAGE AND LAW ENFORCEMENT) WITH NO INCREASE TO THE CURRENT RATE. RESOLUTION NO. 09-108 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RE-ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-2 (DRAINAGE AND LAW ENFORCEMENT) 11 457 474 528 531 533 535 04. REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AND CITY COUNCIL AGENDA JUNE 3, 2009 RESOLUTION NO. 09-109 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DETERMINING THE COST OF SERVICE TO BE FINANCED BY BENEFIT ASSESSMENTS TO BE LEVIED IN DRAINAGE AREA NO. 91-2 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2008-2009 AND DETERMINING AND IMPOSING SUCH BENEFIT ASSESSMENTS 05. APPROVAL TO SET ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 93-3 (FOOTHILL MARKETPLACE) WITH NO INCREASE TO THE CURRENT RATE. RESOLUTION NO. 09-110 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RE-ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 93-3 (FOOTHILL MARKETPLACE) 06. APPROVAL TO SET ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2000-01 (SOUTH ETIWANDA) WITH NO INCREASE TO THE CURRENT RATE. RESOLUTION NO. 09-111 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RE-ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2000-01 (SOUTH ETIWANDA) 07. APPROVAL TO SET ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2000-02 (RANCHO CUCAMONGA CORPORATE PARK) WITH NO INCREASE TO THE CURRENT RATE. RESOLUTION NO. 09-112 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RE-ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2000-02 (RANCHO CUCAMONGA CORPORATE PARK) 08. APPROVAL TO SET ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2000-03 (RANCHO SUMMIT) OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF PARKS AND PARKWAYS WITH NO INCREASE TO THE CURRENT RATE. 12 544 546 557 559 566 568 575 577 584 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AND CITY COUNCIL AGENDA JUNE 3, 2009 13 RESOLUTION NO. 09-113 586 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, PROVIDING FOR THE LEVY OF SPECIAL TAX "B" FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2000- 03 (RANCHO SUMMIT) FOR TAX YEAR 2009-2010 TO FINANCE THE OPERATION OF AND MAINTENANCE OF PARK AND PARKWAYS 09. APPROVAL TO SET ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 596 NO. 2000-03 (RANCHO SUMMIT) WITH NO INCREASE TO THE CURRENT RATE. RESOLUTION NO. 09-114 598 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, PROVIDING FOR THE LEVY OF SPECIAL TAX "A" FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2000- 03 (RANCHO SUMMIT) FOR TAX YEAR 2009-2010 010. APPROVAL TO SET ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 611 NO. 2001-01 (IMPROVEMENT AREA NOS. 1 & 2, SERIES 2001-A}WITH NO INCREASE TO THE CURRENT RATE. RESOLUTION NO. 09-115 ~ 614 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RE-ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2001-01 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2009-2010 (IMPROVEMENT AREA NOS. 1 & 2), SERIES 2001-A 011. APPROVAL TO SET ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 628 NO. 2001-01 (IMPROVEMENT AREA NO. 3, ZONE 7, SERIES 2001-B) WITH NO INCREASE TO THE CURRENT RATE. RESOLUTION NO. 09-116 630 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RE-ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2001-01 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2009-2010 (IMPROVEMENT AREA NO. 3, ZONE 7), SERIES 2001-B 012. APPROVAL TO SET ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2003-01 (IMPROVEMENT AREA NO. 1, ZONES 1, 2 & 3, SERIES 2003-A} WITH NO 637 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AND CITY COUNCIL AGENDA JUNE 3, 2009 RESOLUTION NO. 09-117 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RE-ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX RATE FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2003-01 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2009-2010 (IMPROVEMENT AREA NO. 1, ZONES 1, 2 & 3), SERIES 2003-A 013. RESOLUTION NO. 09-118 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RE-ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2003-01 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2009-2010 (IMPROVEMENT AREA NO. 2, ZONES 1, & 2), SERIES 2003-B 014. APPROVAL TO SET ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2004-01 (RANCHO ETIWANDA ESTATES) WITH NO INCREASE TO THE CURRENT RATE. RESOLUTION NO. 09-119 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RE-ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2004-01 (RANCHO ETIWANDA ESTATES) FOR FISCAL YEAR 2009-2010 015. APPROVAL TO SET ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2006-01 (VINTNER'S GROVE) WITH NO INCREASE TO THE CURRENT RATE. RESOLUTION NO. 09-120 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RE-ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2006-01 (VINTNER'S GROVE) 016. APPROVAL TO SET ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2006-02 (AMADOR ON ROUTE 66) WITH NO INCREASE TO THE CURRENT RATE. RESOLUTION NO. 09-121 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RE-ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2006-02 (AMADOR ON ROUTE 66) FOR FISCAL YEAR 2009-2010 639 649 651 661 663 677 679 694 696 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AND CITY COUNCIL AGENDA JUNE 3, 2009 017. APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING AN ANNUAL LEVY WITHIN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 93-1. (MASI PLAZAI AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF ROCHESTER AVENUE AND FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND REASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 1999-1 WITH NO INCREASE TO THE CURRENT RATE. RESOLUTION NO. 09-122 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RE-AUTHORIZING THE LEVY OF AN ASSESSMENT SURCHARGE FOR THE EXPENSES INCURRED IN THE COLLECTION OF ASSESSMENTS IN VARIOUS SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS DISTRICTS The following items have been requested by the City Council for discussion. P1. COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS (Comments to be limited to three minutes per Councilmember.) P2. LEGISLATIVE AND REGIONAL UPDATES (Oral) I, Debra L. McKay, Assistant City Clerk/Records Manager of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on May 28, 2009, seventy-two (72) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive. 15 711 713 MEETING TO ADJOURN TO JUNE 4, 2009 AT 5:00 P.M. TO REVIEW THE 2009/10 PROPOSED BUDGET. THE MEETING WILL BE HELD IN THE TRI-COMMUNITIES ROOM AT THE CIVIC CENTER, 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE. May 20, 2009 RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, FIRE DISTRICT AND CITY COUNCIL CLOSED SESSION MINUTES The Rancho .Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency, Fire District and City Council held a closed session on Wednesday, May 20, 2009, in the Tapia Room of the Civic Center located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. The meeting-was called to order at 5:35 p.m. by Chairman/PresidenUMayor Donald J. Kurth. Present were Agencymembers/Boardmembers/Councilmembers: Rex Gutierrez, Sam Spagnolo, Diane Williams, Vice Chairman/Vice PresidenUMayor Pro. Tem L. Dennis Michael and Chairman/PresidenUMayor Donald J. Kurth. Also present were: Jack Lam, City Manager; Pamela Easter, Assistant City Manager; James Markman, City Attorney; John Gillison, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services and Linda D. Daniels, Redevelopment Agency Director. ..... Chairman/PresidenUMayor Donald J. Kurth announced the closed session items: B1. LABOR NEGOTIATIONS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54954.2 TO GIVE JOHN GILLISON, DEPUTY' CITY MANAGER AND PAMELA EASTER, ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER, DIRECTION IN REGARDS TO THE MEET AND CONFER PROCESS -RDA, City, Fire B2. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL REGARDING EXISTING LITIGATION PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.9(A) - JR ENTERPRISES, LP V. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA -CASE NUMBER RCV 090728 -City 63. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL REGARDING EXISTING LITIGATION PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.9(A) - FREEDOM FROM RELIGION FOUNDATION, INC V. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND LINDA DANIELS -CASE NUMBER 2:08-CV-07833-PA-PJW, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CA, EASTERN DIVISION-RDA S~G_, PUBLIC C-OMIVIUNICATtIgNS ONE=CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S)-'.. No one was present to comment on the closed session item. Closed session began at 5:35 p.m. ...... No announcements were made. Redevelopment Agency, Fire Protection District, .City Council Minutes May'20, 2009 Page 2 of 15 The closed session adjourned at 6:55 p.m. with no action taken. ..... The meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency, Fire Protection District, and City Council reconvened in the Council Chambers of the Civic Center located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Chairman/PresidenUMayor Donald J. Kurth called the. meeting to order at 7:06 p.m. Present were Agencymembers/Boardmembers/Councilmembers: Rex Gutierrez, Sam Spagnolo, Diane Williams, Vice Chairman/Vice PresidenUMayor Pro Tem L. Dennis Michael and Chairman/PresidenUMayor Donald J. Kurth. Also present were: Jack Lam, City Manager; Pamela Easter, Assistant City Manager; James Markman, City Attorney; Jim Frost, City Treasurer; John Gillison, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services; Linda Daniels, Redevelopment Agency Director; Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director; James Troyer, Planning Director; Trang Huynh, Building and Safety Official; Mark Steuer, Director of Engineering Services; Peter Bryan, Fire Chief; Chief Joe Cusimano, Rancho Cucamonga Police Department; Debra McKay, Records Manager/Assistant City Clerk and Shirr'I Griffin, Deputy City Clerk. H1. Presentation of a Proclamation to the United States Bureau of Census in recognition of the formation of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Complete Count Committee (CCC) - DRC2009-00047 Census 2010. Mayor Kurth presented a Proclamation to Amos Young, Partnership Specialist in recognition of the formation of the City Complete Count Committee. H2. Presentation of Proclamation to Cucamonga Valley Water District in recognition of "Water Awareness Month" May, 2009. Mayor Kurth presented a Proclamation to Cucamonga Valley Water District Board Member James Curatalo Jr. in recognition of "Water Awareness Month". H3. Announcement of the 2009/2010 Season of Performances for the Lewis Family Playhouse at the Victoria Gardens Cultural Center. Susan Sluka-Kelley, Community Services Supervisor, announced the 2009/2010 Season of Performance for the Lewis Family Playhouse. Redevelopment Agency, Fire Protection District, City Council Minutes May 6, 2009 Page 3 of 15 11. Sergio Martinez expressed his support of Councilmember Gutierrez. 12. Jose Carcelen referenced Item L.16 (Citywide Concrete Repair, Tree Removal and Tree Planting Annual Maintenance Agreement). He noted that two addendums were issued, one of which specifically stated that two licenses were required. He expressed a concern that the apparent low bidder did not have both licenses. 13. Guy Eisenbrey noted that the judicial system would determine the appropriate outcome and spoke -about the development of friendships and the appearance of impropriety. He supported putting the development of the 1,200 acre project on hold. 14. Jerie Lee stressed that no charges have been made and noted the need to wait until the facts are in before jumping to conclusions. 15. AI Florez stated that people are innocent until proven guilty. 16. Leslie Grimes expressed concerns with the large campaign contributions being received and hoped that the investigation would continue until justice is done. She did not support the development of the 1,200 acre project. 17. Christian Cebultos expressed his support of Councilmember Gutierrez. 18. Jim Moffatt indicated that Councilmember Gutierrez has not been proven guilty and asked that he be given the beneft of the doubt. 19. Ty Larson expressed his support of Councilmember Gutierrez. 110. John Lyons supported the master aid agreement with ConFire and suggested that the use of text messaging be incorporated. He referenced the Victoria Gardens master plan amendment and requested that a traffic study be done to address any future residential parking in the center. 111. Peggy Quinn expressed her support of Councilmember Gutierrez and was disappointed that negative comments were being made about him. 112. Hilda Phillips noted that if justice needs to be done, the voters would decide. She thanked Chief Bryan and the Fire Department for their services to the community and commended the Cucamonga Valley Water District for their beautiful brochure. 113. Jim Frost stressed the importance of an accurate census. He presented a plaque to the City in appreciation of the support shown for the Run for the Wall XXI. 114. Ian Wagstaff indicated that the Discover Judo Martial Arts Club has been denied use of the dojo at the Cucamonga Middle School for an interclub tournament and requested assistance in resolving this concern. 115. Joel Valenzwella expressed his support of Councilmember Gutierrez and requested that the remaining City Council members refrain from commenting on the matter until it is resolved through the court system. 116. Mark Davidson supported the decorum of the meeting. He stressed the need to balance free speech with the protection of due process. 117. Marcus Solomon expressed his confdence that the matter would be resolved fairly and appreciated the hard work of all of the City Council members. He urged them to protect open space and build more skate parks. Redevelopment Agency, Fire Protection District, City Council Minutes May 20, 2009 Page 4 of 15 118. JoAnn Henkel expressed her support of Councilmember Gutierrez. 119. Thomas Baroudos noted the traffic sign change at the Von's Plaza. and the placement of a three .way stop at that location. As there are still faint "STOP" marks on the ground, drivers are confused. RECESS: The meeting was recessed at 8:33 p.m. RECONVENE: The meeting was reconvened at 8:56 p.m. with all Agencymembers, Boardmembers and Councilmembers being present. Jack Lam, City Manager, recommended that Agenda Item 0.3. (Cancellation of the June 1 and June 3, 2009 Special Council meetings to discuss proposed 1200 acre .project) be added to the agenda by urgency in light of the County Board of Supervisor's action on Tuesday to terminate the cooperative agreement. James Markman, City Attorney, indicated that the need to consider cancelling these meetings arose after the posting of the May 20, 2009 agenda last week. MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by Spagnolo, to add Item 0.3. to the City Council agenda. Motion carried 5-0. ..._.. The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non-controversial. They will be acted upon by the Agency at one time without discussion. Any item may be removed by an Agencymember for discussion. J1. Approval of Minutes: May 6, 2009 (Regular Meeting) J2. Approval of Check Register dated April 30 through May 12, 2009, for the total amount of $1, 872, 003.46. J3. Approval to receive and file current Investment Schedule as of April 30; 2009. J4. Approval to increase Contract No. 09-176/RA09-006 in the amount of $37,396.67 to Mega Way Enterprises, and approve Contract Change Order No. 1 for increasing the block wall height for the construction of Foothill Boulevard and Etiwanda Sidewalks and Block Walls project, to be funded from RDA Funds, Acct. No. 2640801-5650/1670640-0 and appropriate an additional amount of $37,396.67 to Acct. No. 2640801-5650/1670640-0 from RDA Fund balance. J5. Approval to accept the Epicenter Stadium Seat Replacement Project, Contract No. RA 08- 018 as complete, retain the Faithful Performance Bond as a Guarantee Bond, release the Labor and Material Bond and authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and approve the final contract amount of $707,261.10. ~. l Redevelopment Agency, Fire Protection District, City Council Minutes May 6, 2009 Page 5 of 15 RESOLUTION NO. RA 09-007 A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE EPICENTER STADIUM SEAT REPLACEMENT PROJECT, CONTRACT NO. RA 08-018 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK J5. Approval to accept the Pacific Electric Trail Phase V Improvements, Contract No. 08-093 as complete, retain the Faithful Performance Bond as a Guarantee Bond, release the Labor and Material Bond, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and approve the final contract amount of $1,135,978.11. RESOLUTION NO. RA 09-008 A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PACIFIC ELECTRIC TRAIL PHASE V IMPROVEMENTS, CONTRACT NO. 08-093 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK J7. Approval to accept the Epicenter Stadium Handrail Fabrication and Installation Project, Contract No. RA08-034 as complete, release the bonds, retain the Faithful Performance Bond to act as a Maintenance Guarantee Bond, and authorize the Interim Public Works Services Director to file a Notice of Completion and approval the final contract amount of $19,308. RESOLUTION NO. RA 09-009 A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR EPICENTER STADIUM HANDRAIL FABRICATION AND INSTALLATION AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK MOTION: Moved by Spagnolo, seconded by Williams, to approve the staff recommendations in the staff reports contained within the Consent Calendar. Motion carried 5-0. " The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non-controversial. They will be acted upon by the Fire Board at one time without discussion. Any item may be removed by a Boardmember for discussion. K1. Approval of Minutes: May 6, 2009 (Regular Meeting) i K2. Approval of Check Register dated April 30 through May 12, 2009, for the total amount of $29,180.99. K3. Approval to receive and file current Investment Schedule as of April 30, 2009. Redevelopment Agency, Fire Protection District, City Council Minutes May 20, 2009 Page 6 of 15 K4. Approval of a Resolution Adopting a Memorandum of Understanding (FD 09-002) between the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Fire Management Employees Group for Fiscal Year 2009-10. RESOLUTION NO. FD 09-017 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN THE DISTRICT AND FIRE MANAGEMENT EMPLOYEES RELATIVE TO WAGES, BENEFITS AND OTHER TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF EMPLOYMENT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2009-10 K5. Approval of s Resolution declaring results of a Special Election in Community Facilities District No. 85-1, Annexation No. 09-2 (RC66 Plaza LLC - APNs 0207-113-23 & 24) RESOLUTION NO. FD 09-018 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACTING AS THE LEGISLATIVE BODY OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1, DECLARING THE RESULTS OF A SPECIAL ELECTION IN COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1, ANNEXATION NO. 09-2 AND ORDERING THE .ANNEXATION OF SUCH PROPERTY TO COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1 K6. Approval to renew the existing agreement with Willdan Financial Services (FD 09-002) (formerly MuniFinancial) in the amount of $14,650 for contract engineering services to update the County Assessor's tax rolls for Tax Year 2009/10 within Community Facilities District No. 85-1. MOTION: Moved by Michael, seconded by Williams, to approve the staff recommendations in the staff reports contained within the Consent Calendar. Motion carried 5-0. ss:«.+ The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non-controversial. They will be acted upon by the Council at one time without discussion. Any item may be removed by a Councilmember for discussion. In response to the public comment made regarding Item L.17, James Markman, City Attorney, indicated that the double license requirement in the addendum was confusing. Possession of one type of license meets both license requirements. L1. Approval of Minutes: May 6, 2009 (Regular Meeting) L2. Approval of Check Register dated April 30 through May 12, 2009, and payroll ending May 12, 2009, for the total amount of $1,831,756.37. L3. Approval to receive and file current Investment Schedule as of April 30, 2009. Redevelopment Agency, Fire Protection District, City Council Minutes May 6, 2009 Page 7 of 15 L4. Approval to authorize the advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bids" for the FY 2009/2010 Local Street Pavement Rehabilitation (Slurry Seal) and Parking Lot Resurfacing (Seal Coat) at Various Locations, to be funded from Prop 42 Traffic Relief Fund, Acct. No. 1 1 90 303-565 0/1 0 221 90-0 for construction of said project. RESOLUTION NO. 09-085 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE FY 2009/2010 LOCAL STREET PAVEMENT REHABILITATION (SLURRY SEAL) AND PARKING LOT RESURFACING (SEAL COAT) AT VARIOUS LOCATIONS, IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS L5. Approval for the purchase of five (5) Ford vehicles from Redlands Ford of Redlands, California, as per request for bid (RFB) #08/09-014 and authorize the expenditure of $129,308.72, to be funded from Acct. No. 1712001-5604 (Equipment and Vehicle Replacement Fund). L6. Approval for the purchase of one (1) Ford E-350 Signal Maintenance Cargo Van from Downtown Ford of Sacramento, California, as per request for bid (RFB) #08/09-010, and authorize the expenditure of $67,909.95 to be funded from Acct. No. 1712001-5604 (Vehicle and Equipment Replacement Fund) as approved in the FY 2008-2009 budget. L7. Approval to purchase seven (7) Traffic Controller Cabinets from Econolite, Inc., of Anaheim and authorize the expenditure of $239,581.51, to be funded from Acct. No. 1712001-5603 (Equipment/Vehicle Replacement Fund), and appropriate $39,581.51 from the Equipment/Vehicle Replacement Fund balance. L8. Approval to purchase seven (7) sets of six (6) 41-AMP and 40 sets of six (6) 51-AMP traffic signal replacement batteries from Interstate Battery as per request for bid (RFB) #08/09-012 and authorize the expenditure of. $79,711.42, to be funded from Acct. No. 1712001-5200 (EquipmentNehicle Replacement Fund) as approved in the FY 2008-2009 budget. L9. Approval to award the purchase of one (1) lot of Hewlett Packard printers, plotters, miscellaneous equipment, and maintenance from Diltex; Inc., in the amount of $134,094 per RFB #08/09-008 and authorize the expenditure of a 10% contingency in the amount of $13,409, for a grand total of $147,503, to be funded as follows: $10,216 from 1714001- 5200 (Computer Equipment/Technical Replacement Fund -Operations & Maintenance); $102,252 from 1714001-5215 (Operations & Maintenance/Computer Equipment); $22,713 from 1714001-5300 (Contract Services); and $12,322 from 1714001-5605 (Capital Outlay- Computer Equipment). L10. Apprbval of Community Services Update Report L11. Approval to increase Contract No. 09-176/RA09-006 in the amount of $37,396.67 to Mega Way Enterprises, and approve Contract Change Order No. 1 for increasing the block wall height for the construction of Foothill Boulevard and. Etiwanda Sidewalks and Block Walls project, to be funded from RDA Funds, Acct. No. 2640801-5650/1670640-0 and appropriate an additional amount of $37,396.67 to Acct. No. 2640801-5650/1670640-0 from RDA Fund balance. Redevelopment Agency, Fire Protection District, City Council Minutes May 20, 2009 Page 8 of 15 L12. Approval to accept the bids received, award and authorize the execution of the contract in the amount of $475,000.00 to the apparent low Bidder, Elite Bobcat Service, Inc. (CO 09- 199), and authorize the expenditure of a 10% contingency in the amount of $47,500 for the Victoria Park Lane Pavement Rehabilitation from Fairmont Way to Rochester Avenue and from 300' east of Day Creek Boulevard to Base Line Road, to be funded from Proposition 1 B Funds, Acct. Nos. 1 1 94 30 3-5650/1 6861 94-0 2, 1194303-5650/1687194-02 and 1194303-5650/ 1688194-02. L13. Approval to accept the bids received, award and authorize the execution of the contract in the amount of $646,000 to the apparent low bidder, Hardy & Harper, Inc. (CO 09-200), and authorize the expenditure of a 10% contingency in the amount of $64,600 for the Fiscal Year 2009/2010 Local Street Pavement Rehabilitation Overlay of Various Streets, Part 2, to be funded from Proposition 16 Funds, Acct. No. 1194303-5650/1022194-0 and appropriate $715,000 to Acct. No. 1194303-5650/1022194-0 from Proposition 16 Fund balance. . L14. Approval to accept the bids received, award and authorize the execution of the contract in the amount of $135,211 to the apparent low bidder, Hil/crest Contracting, Inc. CO 09-201), and authorize the expenditure of a 10% contingency in the amount of $13,521.10 for the FY 2008/2009 Bus Bay, Driveway and ADA Access Ramp Improvements at Various Locations, to be funded from Measure "I" Fund and Pedestrian Grant Article 3 Fund, Acct. No. 1176303-5650/1150176-0 and 1 2 1 4303-56 50/1 521 21 4-0, respectively and appropriate $ $30,040.00 to Acct. No. 1 21 430 3-5650/1 521 21 4-0 from Pedestrian Grant Article 3 Fund balance. L15. Approval to accept the bids received, award and authorize the execution of the contract in the amount of $341,974 to the apparent low bidder, International Pavement Solutions, Inc. (CO 09-202), and authorize the expenditure of a 10% contingency in the amount of $34,197.40 for the Hillside Road Pavement Rehabilitation from West City Limit to Beryl Street, to be funded from Proposition 1 B Funds, Acct. Nos. 1194303-5650/1682194-0 and 1194303-5650/1713194-0 and appropriate $210,000 to Acct. No. 1194303-5650/1682194- 0 and $210,000 to Acct. No. 1 1 9430 3-56 50/1 71 31 94-0 from Proposition 1 B Fund balance. L16. Approval tc accept the bids received, award and authorize the execution of a contract effective July 1, 2009 through June 30, 2010 with JDC, Inc. (CO 09-203) of Rancho Cucamonga for the Citywide Concrete Repair, Tree Removal and Tree Planting Annual Maintenance Agreement,' to be funded from Measure "I" Fund 1176303-5300 and authorize the City Manager or his/her designee to adjust the spending limit of said contract on an as-needed basis in accordance with the approved Public Works Services Department Concrete Contract Budget Line 5300, and authorize the City Manager or his/her designee to renew said contract upon mutual consent for additional one (1) year periods. L17. Approval of Improvement Agreement Extension for DRC2005-01060, located at the southern cul-de-sac terminus of Sierra Madre Avenue (south of Ninth Street), submitted by National Community Renaissance of California. RESOLUTION NO. 09-086 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR DRC2005-01060 ! ~ , L18. Approval to release the Maintenance Guarantee Cash Deposit for DRC2003-00184, located on the north side of Valley View Street, submitted by Amethyst Estates, LLC. Redevelopment Agency, Fire Protection District, City Council Minutes May 6, 2009 Page 9 of 15 L19. Approval to accept Improvements, retain the Faithful Performance Bond in lieu of a Maintenance Bond, and file a Notice of Completion for improvements for DRC2006-00692, located on the south side of Arrow Route between Pecan Avenue and Hickory Avenue, submitted by Rancho Arrow Highway, LLC. RESOLUTION NO: 09-087 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR DRC2006-00692 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK L20. Approval to accept [he Construction of Traffic Signal Interconnection System at 23 Locations project, Contract No. OS-052 as complete, retain the Faithful Performance bond as a Guarantee Bond, release the Labor and Material Bond, and authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and approve the final contract amount of $217,718.19. RESOLUTION NO. 09-088 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE CONSTRUCTION OF TRAFFIC SIGNAL INTERCONNECTION SYSTEM AT 23 LOCATIONS PROJECT, CONTRACT NO. OS-052 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK L21. Approval to accept the Pacific Electric Trail Phase V Improvements, Contract No. 08-093 as complete, retain the Faithful Performance Bond as a Guarantee Bond, release the Labor and Material Bond, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and approve the final contract amount of $1,135,978.11. RESOLUTION NO. 09-089 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PACIFIC ELECTRIC TRAIL PHASE V IMPROVEMENTS, CONTRACT NO. 08-093 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK L22. Approval to release the Letter of Credit for Parcel Map 16951, located on the west side of Hellman Avenue, approximately 1,100 feet of north of Church Street, submitted by Reiny and Diane Schneider. MOTION: Moved by Michael, seconded by Spagnolo, to approve the staff recommendations in the staff reports contained within the Consent Calendar. Motion carried 5-0. " ~~" ".:M ,CONSENT~ORDINANCES~_"~ {. ,. The following Ordinances have had public hearings at the time of first reading. Second readings are expected to be routine and non-controversial. The Agency, Fire Board, or Council will act upon them at one time without discussion. The City Clerk will read the title. Any item can be removed for discussion by an Agencymember, Boardmember, or Councilmember. Redevelopment Agency, Fire Protection District, City Council Minutes May 20, 2009 Page 10 of 15 M1. SUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT DRC2008-00381 AND VICTORIA COMMUNITY -PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2008-00383 - FOREST CITY ENTERPRISES. INC. - A proposed amendment to the text of the Victoria Community Plan to accommodate changes to the Victoria Gardens Master Plan (VGMP). and to clarify that the VGMP shall control the land uses in the VGMP area for the Victoria Gardens Regional Mixed Use Lifestyle Center, .located in the eastern portion of the City of Rancho Cucamonga bordered by Foothill Boulevard to the south, Church Street to the north, Day Creek Boulevard to the west and Interstate I-15 to the east. Related Files: Environmental Impact Report DRC2008-00381, General Plan Amendment DRC2008-00384, Victoria Arbors Master Plan Amendment DRC 2009-00146, Victoria Gardens Master Plan Amendment DRC2009-00145 and Development Agreement Amendment DRC2008- 00385. (M1 - M4 were considered together) ORDINANCE NO. 813 (second reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2008-00383 CHANGING THE RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL STANDARDS AND MODIFYING VARIOUS TEXT IN THE COMMUNITY PLAN TO ACCOMMODATE THE AMENDED VICTORIA GARDENS MASTER PLAN ON APPROXIMATELY 174 ACRES OF LAND AND IS GENERALLY BOUNDED BY CHURCH STREET TO THE NORTH, FOOTHILL BOULEVARD TO THE SOUTH, I-15 TO THE EAST, AND DAY CREEK BOULEVARD TO THE WEST, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF. MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by Spagnolo, to adopt Ordinance Nos. 813 for second reading. Motion carried 5-0. M2. ENTERPRISES. INC.- A proposed amendment to the Victoria Gardens Master Plan (VGMP) modifying "Permissible Building Areas" to reallocate Dwelling Unit and Commercial Office square footage, increase the average building heights and change building setback requirements within the Main Street Area, and clarifying permitted and conditionally permitted uses within the VGMP, located in the eastern portion of the City of Rancho Cucamonga bordered by Foothill Boulevard to the south, Church Street to the north, Day Creek Boulevard to the west and Interstate I-15 to the east. Related Files: Environmental Impact Report DRC2008-00381, General Plan Amendment DRC2008- 00384, Development Agreement Amendment DRC2008-00385, Victoria Community Plan Amendment DRC2008-00383, Victoria Arbors Master Plan Amendment DRC 2009-00146. (M 1 - M4 were considered together) ORDINANCE NO. 814 (second reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING VICTORIA GARDENS MASTER PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2009-00145 MODIFYING THE MASTER PLAN TO ALLOW RESIDENTIAL USES IN THE MAIN STREET AREA, INCREASE THE AVERAGE HEIGHT IN THE MAIN STREET AREA TO 120 FEET, WITH A MAXIMUM OF 160 FEET, AMEND THE BUILDING SETBACK REQUIREMENTS FOR THE MAIN STREET AREA, AND CLARIFY PERMITTED AND CONDITIONALLY PERMITTED USES, GENERALLY BOUNDED BY CHURCH STREET TO THE NORTH, FOOTHILL BOULEVARD TO THE SOUTH, I-15 TO THE EAST, AND DAY CREEK BOULEVARD TO THE WEST; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF Redevelopment Agency, Fire Protection District, City Council Minutes May 6, 2009 Page 11 of 15 M3. VICTORIA ARBORS MASTER PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2009-00146 -FOREST CITY ENTERPRISES. INC - A proposed amendment to the text of the Victoria Arbors Master Plan to include references to the VGMP and clarify that the VGMP shall control the land uses in the VGMP area for the Victoria Gardens Regional Mixed Use Lifestyle Center, located in the eastern portion of the City of Rancho Cucamonga bordered by Foothill Boulevard to the south, Church Street to the north, Day Creek Boulevard to the west and Interstate I-15 to the east. Related Files: Environmental Impact Report DRC2008-00381, General Plan Amendment DRC2008-00384, Victoria Community Plan Amendment DRC2008-00383, Victoria Gardens Master Plan Amendment DRC2009-00145, and Development Agreement Amendment DRC2008-00385. (M1 - M4 were considered together) ORDINANCE NO. 815 (second reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING VICTORIA ARBORS MASTER PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2009-00146 MODIFYING THE TEXT OF THE MASTER PLAN TO MAKE IT CONSISTENT W ITH THE AMENDMENTS TO THE VICTORIA GARDENS MASTER PLAN PROPOSED BY DRC2009-00145, GENERALLY BOUNDED BY CHURCH STREET TO THE NORTH, FOOTHILL BOULEVARD TO THE SOUTH, I-15 TO THE EAST, AND DAY CREEK BOULEVARD TO THE WEST; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF M4. DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT AMENDMENT DRC2008-00385 - FOREST CITY ENTERPRISES. INC. - A proposed amendment to Development Agreement DA01-02 to incorporate General Plan Amendment DRC2008-00384; Victoria Community Plan Amendment DRC2008-00383; Victoria Arbors Master Plan Amendment DRC2009-00146 and Victoria Gardens Master Plan Amendment DRC2009-00145,into the vested rights applicable to the Victoria Gardens Regional Mixed Use Lifestyle Center, located in the eastern portion of the City of Rancho Cucamonga bordered by Foothill Boulevard to the south, Church Street to the north, Day Creek Boulevard to the west and Interstate I-15 to the east. Related Files: Environmental Impact Report DRC2008-00381, General Plan Amendment DRC2008-00384; Victoria Community Plan Amendment DRC2008-00383, Victoria Arbors Master Plan Amendment DRC 2009-00146, and Victoria Gardens Master Plan Amendment DRC2009-00145. (M1 - M4 were considered together) ORDINANCE NO. 816 (second reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE THIRD AMENDMENT TO DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT 01-02 FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF VICTORIA GARDENS, GENERALLY BOUNDED BY CHURCH STREET TO THE NORTH, FOOTHILL BOULEVARD TO THE SOUTH, I-15 TO THE EAST, AND DAY CREEK BOULEVARD TO THE WEST, INCORPORATING AMENDMENTS TO THE GENERAL PLAN, VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN, VICTORIA ARBORS MASTER PLAN, AND VICTORIA GARDENS MASTER PLAN; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF MOTION: Moved by Michael, seconded by Williams, to adopt Ordinance Nos. 814, 815 and 816 for second reading. Motion carried 5-0. ,.... Redevelopment Agency, Fire Protection District, City Council Minutes May 20, 2009 Page 12 of 15 . `N ,ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARII~TGS~ ~_ ,* t .t `" * ~ '? FIRE PROTECTIQiV DISTRICT -~x ~ _~ ` The following items have been advertised and/or posted as public hearings as required . by law. It is recommended that the following two items (N1& N2) be continued to June 3, 2009. N1. AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA -FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE LEVY OF THE SPECIAL TAX IN MELLO-ROOS COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2009/10 N2. CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION CONTINUING THE ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX RATE TO BE LEVIED IN MELLO-ROOS COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-1 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2009/10 RESOLUTION NO. FD-019 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING THE ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-1 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2009/10 Jack Lam, City Manager, recommended that the public hearings for Items N1 and N2 be contihued to June 3, 2009. MOTION: Moved by Michael, seconded by Spagnolo, to continue the public hearings for N1 and N2 to June 3, 2009. Motion carried 5-0. The following items have no legal publication or posting requirements. 01. Mike Bell, Deputy Fire Chief, and John Gillison, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services, presented the staff report. In response to Councilmember Gutierrez, John Gillison, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services spoke about the cost saving benefits of joining a Joint Powers Authority. Chief Bell addressed the longstanding goal to provide emergency medical dispatch services and believed that this would improve services to the community. ORDINANCE NO. FD 48 (first reading) Redevelopment Agency, Fire Protection District, City Council Minutes May 6, 2009 Page 13 of 15 In response to Mayor Kurth, Chief Bell indicated that EMS has been in use for many years. Recently, he indicated that CONFIRE has started using it. Also discussed was the impact to the Department in terms of training and change in procedures. Mayor Pro Tem Michael appreciated the benefits of this agreement and looked forward to providing a greater level of service using the EMS system: Councilmember Williams concurred. Councilmember Spagnolo thanked the Council for their commitment to public safety. Councilmember Gutierrez expressed appreciation to the Fire Department and to the City of Ontario for their services. Mayor Kurth noted that the transition to EMS will save people's lives. MOTION: Moved by Spagnolo, seconded by Williams, to approve the master agreement for "emergency communications and Fire/EMS Dispatch Services with Consolidated Fire Agencies of the East Valley. Motion carried 5-0. 02. APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION FINDING A SEVERE FISCAL HARDSHIP WILL EXIST RELATED TO STATE BUDGET CRISIS RESOLUTION NO. 09-090 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, FINDING A SEVERE FISCAL HARDSHIP WILL EXIST IF ADDITIONAL CITY PROPERTY TAX FUNDS ARE SEIZED AND ADDITIONAL UNFUNDED MANDATES ARE ADOPTED BY THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA Josh Torres, City Manager's Office Intern, presented the staff report. Mayor Pro Tem Michael expressed a concern with the State's ongoing budget crisis. He noted that the State is constantly broke and seems unable to fix the problem. There is no guarantee that additional funds will not be needed next year. Mayor Pro Tem Michael suggested that an icon be placed on the City's Internet site so that residents can see the Resolution urging the State not to seize any more City property tax funds. Councilmember Williams urged residents to contact their legislators with this concern. Councilmember Spagnolo noted that the League of California Cities is sponsoring a trip to Sacramento on June 3, 2009 to relay this concern to State leaders. MOTION: Moved by Michael, seconded by Gutierrez, to adopt Resolution No. 09-090 finding a severe financial hardship will exist if additional City property tax funds are seized and additional unfunded mandates are adopted. Motion carried 5-0. 0.3. Cancellation of the June 1 and June 3, 2009 Special Council meetings to discuss proposed 1200 acre project-Added by Urgency. Jack Lam, City Manager, reported that on May 19, 2009, the San Bernardino County Board of Supervisors terminated the Cooperative agreement with the City on the proposed 1,200 acre project. Therefore, he recommended that the City Council cancel the previously scheduled June 1s~ and June 3rtl meetings to discuss responses to a previously issued Request for Qualifications and to make a recommendation to the Board of Supervisors. MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by Gutierrez, to eliminate these two meetings. Motion carried 5-0. Redevelopment Agency, Fire Protection District, City Council Minutes May 20, 2009 Page 14 of 15 The following items have been requested'by the City Council for discussion. P1. James Troyer, Planning Director, and Trang Huyrih, Building and Safety Official, presented the staff report. In response to Mayor Pro Tem Michael, James Markman, City Attorney indicated that if the new homeowner does not provide access, they would be violating the neighbor's property rights. In response to Councilmember Gutierrez, Trang Huynh, Building and Safety Official, stated that a letter had been sent to the realtor in order to obtain a key and put them on notice of the problem. Mr. Huynh indicated that he has been promised a key by the end of this week. He had also contacted the utility companies in the hope that they might be able to help. Christian Nelson from Southern California Edison indicated that the provision of the California Utilities Code requires clear and unfettered access. He stated that he would look into this matter further. Karen Pusatori and Sergio Martinez provided photographs of the home and the gate. Ms. Pusatori noted that the neighbors in the surrounding area do not need to access someone's private back yard to reach their utilities. She requested that the gate be removed. Mr. Martinez indicated that the Planning Department approved the plans to build a dividing wall on a zero lot line property. This approval was done without researching the CC&Rs on the property. He requested that the Department acknowledge the defect in the approval and require the homeowner to remove the gate. For a long term solution, Mr. Martinez suggested among other things that staff .review applicable CC&Rs, make sure that any structural improvements do not violate Penal Code Section 420.1 and that the Municipal Code be amended to address this matter. In response, James Markman, City Attorney, indicated that the City's obligation was to ensure compliance with building codes. The City can not enforce CC&Rs nor require removal of the gate. He suggested that Ms. Pusatori and Mr. Martinez work with the future homeowner to move the gate back. James Troyer, Planning Director, noted that safeguards are being put in place to avoid this type of situation from occurring in the future. Mayor Pro Tem Michael noted that Ms. Pusatori will be provided a key while the home is vacant and indicated that the realtor will be encouraged to allow access or more the fencing around. Councilmember Gutierrez encouraged staff to work on an Ordinance to prevent this type of situation from happening in the future. P2. COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS (Comments to be limited to three minutes per Councilmember.) Councilmember Spagnolo commented on his attendance at the National Police Week Blue Ribbon ~ ~ Breakfast. He provided photographs of the water tour offered by the Cucamonga Valley Water District. Councilmember Gutierrez thanked the Friends of the Pacific Electric Trail for the Cucamonga Challenge. He expressed his appreciation of the residents who attended the meeting tonight and Redevelopment Agency, Fire Protection District, City Council Minutes May 6, 2009 -Page 15 of 15 spoke in his support. He requested everyone's patience while he resolved the civil dispute with his former employer. In response to Mayor Pro Tem Michael, City Manager Jack Lam spoke about the importance of obtaining an accurate census count. Councilmember Williams thanked the Friends of the Pacific Electric Trail for the very successful Cucamonga Challenge. Mayor Kurth thanked the audience for maintaining decorum during the public communications period. He indicated that he welcomed the opportunity to meet with residents and promised to keep spending within reason. No items were identified. i ? +~. ,~ ~ r ..R ,, ~JOURNMENT~ .,'.~ "r- r~. •~ w_ Mayor Kurth adjourned the meeting at 10:30 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Debra L. McKay, MMC Assistant City ClerklRecords Manager Approved: """ RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Al=enda Check Register S/13/2009 through S/26/2009 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00282554 5/13/2009 COPIES & INK PRINTING INC. 443.18 AP - 00282SS6 S/13/2009 COSTAR REALTY INFORMATION INC 1,792.91 AP - 00282601 S/13/2009 HILL AND KNOWLTON INC 8,020.00 AP - 00282601 S/13/2009 HILL AND KNOWLTON INC 900.00 AP - 00282601 S/13/2009 HILL AND KNOWLTON INC 831.13 AP - 00282611 S/13/2009 INLAND EMPIRE UTILITIES AGENCY 178,225.19 AP - 00282614 5/13/2009 INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL OF SHOPPING CEN' 25.00 AP - 00282618 S/13/2009 J L PATTERSON & ASSOCIATES INC ] 6,095.00 AP - 00282630 S/13/2009 LIM & NASCIMENTO ENGINEERING CORP 1,868.51 AP - 00282663 S/13/2009 PB AMERICAS INC 6,397.00 AP - 00282664 S/13/2009 PBS&J INC 2,823.91 AP - 00282678 S/13/2009 RANCHO CUCAMONGA QUAKES PROFESSIONP 176.00 AP - 00282688 S/13/2009 RRM DESIGN GROUP 8,016.81 AP - 00282702 S/13/2009 SIGMANET 1,237.50 AP - 00282723 S/13/2009 URS CORPORATION 6,250.00 AP - 00282741 5/14/2009 ATLAS TESTING LABORATORIES INC. 10,447.50 AP - 00282744 S/20/2009 A & I REPROGRAPHICS 241.25 AP - 00282774 S/20/2009 AUFBAU CORPORATION 15,563.00 AP - 00282800 5/20/2009 CALIFORNIA CENTERS MAGAZINE INC. 3,500.00 AP - 00282828 S/20/2009 DIRECTORY & MAPS USA INC. 5,400.00 AP - 00282836 5/20/2009 EIGHTH AVENUE ENTERPRISE LLC 32.63 AP - 00282841 S/20/2009 EN POINTE TECHNOLOGIES SALES INC 7,625.49 AP - 00282847 S/20/2009 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 11.02 AP - 00282847 S/20/2009 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 16.76 AP - 00282847 5/20/2009 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 15.16 AP - 00282847 5/20/2009 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORD 13.62 AP - 00282847 Sl20/2009 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 19.96 AP - 00282851 S/20/2009 FRANCE PUBLICATIONS INC. 3,550.00 AP - 002828SS S/20/2009 GEOGRAPHICS 44.86 AP - 002828SS S/20/2009 GEOGRAPHICS 5,123.21 AP - 00282857 S/20/2009 GILLISON, JOHN 60.44 AP - 00282858 S/20/2009 GOLDEN SOURCE INTERNATIONAL 904.88 AP - 00282867 S/20/2009 GROUP C COMMUNICATIONS INC 7,700.00 AP - 00282875 S/20/2009 HERK EDWARDS INC 39,711.03 P1 P2 MEMORANDUM CITY CLERKS OFFICE RANCxo Date: June 3, 2009 ~,;UCAMONGA To: Chairman and Members of the Redevelopment Agency President and Members of the Fire Board Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, City Manager From: Debra L. McKay, MMC Assistant City Clerk/Records Manager Subject: Approval of a Resolution Changing the Time of Closed Session RECOMMENDATION It is recommended the Redevelopment Agency/Fire Board/City Council approve the attached Resolution changing the time of Closed Session to 5:00 p.m. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Currently, the Redevelopment Agency/Fire Board/City Council Closed Session starts at 5:30 p.m. A Resolution has been prepared changing the time to 5:00 p.m. in order to ensure the participation of all members. Res ectfully submitted, ~l~ 1 De a L. McKay, MMC Assistant City Clerk/Records Manager Attachment (as noted) P3 RESOLUTION NO. RA 09-0/0 A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DETERMINING THE DAYS, TIME AND PLACE OF REGULAR MEETINGS OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY WHEREAS, the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency Board of Directors of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby resolve as follows: SECTION 1: Regular Meetings of the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency shall be held in the Council Chambers at the Civic Center complex located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California, on the first and third Wednesday of each month. Each such regular meeting, commencing with the meeting of May 20, 2009, shall commence at 5:00 p.m. in the Tapia Room on the upper level of the Civic Center for purposes of conducting an Executive Session only. The remainder of each such meeting shall commence and be conducted at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the Civic Center. SECTION 2: Said regular meeting shall continue to occur on the first and third Wednesday of each month in the Council Chambers as stated above. Please see the following page for formal adoptlon, certification and signatures P4 Resolution RA No. 09-*** Page 2 of 2 PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 3`d day of June 2009. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: Donald J. Kurth, M.D., Chairman ATTEST: Janice C. Reynolds, Secretary I, JANICE C. REYNOLDS, SECRETARY of the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved and adopted by the Redevelopment Agency at a Regular Meeting held on the 3rd day of June 2009. Executed this 4th day of June 2009, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Janice C. Reynolds, Secretary STAFF REPORT LtiCIKI?I•:RING Si':li\'ICliti DIihAR'1'M15NT Date: June 3, 2009 RANCHO C,,UCAMONGA To: Mayor and Redevelopment Agency Members Jack Lam, AICP, Executive Director From: Mark A. Steuer, Director of Engineering Ser~~vi~~ces/City Engineer By: Ty Quaintance, Facilities Superintendent G~Y'`C Shelley Hayes, Assistant Engineer ~~ ~j Subject: ACCEPT THE BIDS RECEIVED AND AWARD AND AUTHORIZE THE EXECUTION OF THE CONTRACT IN THE AMOUNT OF $452,450.00 TO THE APPARENT LOW BIDDER, HOWARD RIDLEY COMPANY, INC, AND AUTHORIZE THE EXPENDITURE OF A 10% CONTINGENCY IN THE AMOUNT OF $45,245.00, FOR THE CIVIC CENTER PLANTER AND PARKING STRUCTURE WATERPROOFING, TO BE FUNDED FROM CIVIC CENTER RESERVE FUNDS, ACCOUNT NO. 2624801-5650/1705624-0 AND APPROPRIATE $50,000.00 TO ACCOUNT NO. 2624801-5650/1705624-0 FROM CIVIC CENTER RESERVE FUND BALANCE RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the RDA accept the bids received and award and authorize the execution of the contract in the amount of $452,450.00 to the apparent lowest responsive bidder, Howard Ridley Company, Inc., and authorize the expenditure of a 10% contingency in the amount of $45,245.00, for the Civic Center Planter and Parking Structure Waterproofing, to be funded from Civic Center Reserve Funds, Account No. 2624801-5650/1705624-0 and appropriate $50,000.00 to Account No. 2624801-5650/1705624-0 from Civic Center Reserve Fund Balance. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Per previous Council action, bids were solicited, received and opened on April 21, 2009, for the subject project. The Engineer's estimate for the base bid was $400,600.00. Staff has reviewed all bids received and found all but three to be complete and in accordance with the bid requirements with any irregularities to be inconsequential. The bid proposals from Industrial Coating & Restoration, Waterproofing Experts and JFP Company were found to be non-responsive to the City's needs. Staff has completed the required background investigation and finds the apparent low bidder meets the requirements of the bid documents. A portion of the appropriated funds will be used for construction support services such as inspection and restoration of plant materials in the planters. The scope of work consists of removal of the existing planter waterproofing membrane and (lashings and installation of a new fluid-applied waterproofing system, protection board, drainage board and root barrier in each planter; complete removal of existing materials as necessary, provide and install membrane, flashings, horizontal to vertical transition materials, wear course/non-slip double textured aggregate finish, preparation of the substrate consisting of crack and spall repair, surface preparation to accept new waterproofing and parking lot striping. The contract documents call for fifty (50) working days to complete this construction. Res submitted, uer Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer P5 P6 VICINITY MAP '1^ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA D7 BD) SUMMARY FOR BID OPENING APRIL 21, 2009 APPARENT LOW afDOER 2 3 ~ ~ CI VIC CENTER PLANTER AND PARKING Ho WARD RD)LEY CO., BEATER BEST CONTRACTING STRUCTURE WATERPROOFING ENGINEER'S ESTffiATH INC WATERPROOFING INC 6ERVICE& INC UmT am [MIT UNtT UNIT NO QTY UMT DBfiCRIPTION COB] ~ AMOUNT COfiT AMOUNT CO6T AMOUNT CO6T ~ AMODNT New Planter Wate roofin a stem P g Y $20,030.00 $a,500.00~ $4,500.00 1 $],955.00( $],955.00 $11,000.00 $11,000.00 1. t LS (Materials) 20,030.00 New planter Wateproofing system, Labor i (Prevailing wage will require certified szo,oao.oo s],ooo.oo! $],ODO.DO $2s,oa6.o0 $25,006.00 $Ia,DDO.oo $la,ooo.oo 2. 1 LS payroll records.) 20,030.00 ' Parking Suvtture Waterproo ing system 3. 1 LS (materials) 40,060.00 $40,060.00 $210,000.00 $210000.00 $193,]28.00 $193,]28.00 $258,Sfi2.00 $258.562.00 Pariting Structure Waterproofing 1 system, Labor (Prevailing wage will $320,480.00 $230,950.00 $230,950.00 $258.W 1.00 5258,0]L00 $205,288.00 $203.288.00 4. 1 LS require certified ayroll recoMs.) 320,480.00 ~ TOTALS ~, 5400,600.00 $652,450.00 8484,800.00 $488,860.00 BID SUMMARY FOR B[D OPENING APRIL 21, 2009 4 5 CI\'IC CENTER PLANTER AND PARKING 60UTHWEST COATING STRUCTURE \\'ATERPROOFING Ixc SPECTRA COMPANY UNIT BID UMT NO TY UNIT DN6CA~TION CO6T AMOVNT C06T AMOUNT New Planar Wateproofing system ' 1. 7 LS (Materials) $85,000.00 585,000.00 $2,]91.00 57,]91.00 (Prevailing wage will require certified 2. 1 LS pavroLL records.) $50.000.00 $50.000.00 I 528,765.00 $28,]65.00 Parking Struc[llre WffierprOOfng SVS[em 1 3. 1 LS (materials) $290,000.00 $290,000.00 $300.306.00 5300,306.00 Parking Structure Waterproofing 4. 1 LS system, Labor (Prevailing wage will $195,000.001 $la5.OD0.00 $198.139.00 5198,139.00 TOTALS $37o,o(ID.00 1 $]35,20 1.00 STAFF REPORT - REDEVELOP\tE\T AGESCY RANCHO Date: June 3, 2009 C,UCAMONGA To: Chairman and Members of the Redevelopment Agency Board From: Linda Daniels, Redevelopment Director By: Tranda Drumwright, Housing Programs Manager Subject: APPROVAL OF A BUDGET APPROPRIATION FOR THE AMOUNT OF $28,686,100 TO BE FUNDED FROM ACCOUNT NUMBER 2620801-5620/0-1250 PURSUANT TO A LOAN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AND NORTHTOWN HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF SAN SEVAINE VILLAS RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Agency Board approve an appropriation totaling $28,686,100 into Account # 2623801-5620/0-1250 for the construction of San Sevaine Villas prior to June 30, 2009. BACKGROUND: On August 17, 2005, a $40.7 million dollar loan agreement was approved between the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency and Northtown Housing Development Corporation (NHDC) for the construction of 225 units of workforce housing. The loan was structured to include funding for land acquisition and the cost of constructing the units. To date, $8.3 million of the original loan has been spent on pre-development costs and land acquisition. An appropriation of $28,686,100 will be expended in the 2008-2009 budget year. NHDC is on schedule to start construction in June and a portion of the construction funds will need to be available prior to July 1, 2009. The remaining loan amount of $3,700,000 is a contingency and is only to be used, if needed, to complete the construction of the project. Agency staff recommends that the Agency Board approve the appropriation of $28,686,100 for the 2008-2009 budget year. The remaining loan balance of $3,700,000 will be budgeted for fiscal year 2009-2010. Re pecffully submitted, " ~. Li da D. Daniels P8 Redevelopment Director RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Resister S/13/2009 through S/26/2009 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00282504 S'13/2009 ABLETRONICS 143.15 AP - 00282528 5/13/2009 BALL, ROBERT 139.93 AP - 00282533 S/13/2009 BICONDOVA, JOHN 320.00 AP - 00282566 S/13/2009 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT SS.20 AP - 00282615 S/1312009 INTERSTATE BATTERIES 391.11 AP - 00282636 S/13/2009 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 81.50 AP - 00282636 S/13/2009 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 9.22 AP - 00282636 5/13/2009 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 44.51 AP - 00282636 S/13/2009 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 26.03 AP - 00282636 S/13/2009 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 228.20 AP - 00282636 S/13/2009 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 14.05 AP - 00282648 S/13/2009 NAVARRETTE, DANIEL ]. 152.00 AP - 00282709 S/13/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 610.53 AP - 00282709 S/13/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 133.45 AP - 00282727 5/13/2009 VERIZON 36.16 AP - 00282727 S/13/2009 VERIZON 18.65 AP - 00282727 S/13/2009 VERIZON 469.97 AP - 00282756 5/20/2009 ALL CITIES TOOLS 98.20 AP - 00282756 S/20/2009 ALL CITIES TOOLS 318.38 AP - 00282760 S/20/2009 AMERICAN SCALE CO INC 20S.S0 AP - 00282761 S/20l2009 AMO RECOVERIES INC. 3,145.66 AP - 00282761 S/20/2009 AMO RECOVERIES INC. 87.50 AP - 00282816 S/20/2009 COPIES & INK PRINTING INC. 59.29 AP - 00282836 S/20/2009 EIGHTH AVENUE ENTERPRISE LLC 24898 AP - 00282838 S/20/2009 EMCOR SERVICE 2,493.00 AP - 00282840 S/20/2009 EMPLOYMENT SOLUTIONS 2]0.00 AP - 00282847 S/20l2009 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 19.96 AP - 00282853 S/20/2009 GANDOLFO'S NY DELI 195.71 AP - 00282870 S/20/2009 HANDMAN, MIKE 721.00 AP - 00282879 S/20/2009 HOSE MAN INC 14.14 AP - 00282879 S/20/2009 HOSE MAN INC 2784 AP - 00282879 S/20/2009 HOSE MAN INC 203.37 AP - 00282880 S/20/2009 HOYT LUMBER CO., SM 3.43 AP - 00282880 S/20/2009 HOYT LUMBER CO., SM 1.94 AP - 00282884 S/20/2009 ICC 280.00 AP - 00282895 S/20/2009 INSIGHT 1,853.96 AP - 00282896 S/20/2009 INTERNATIONAL EZ UP INC 193.58 AP - 00282909 S/20/2009 LANDORF, RICHARD 274.00 AP - 00282912 S/20/2009 LIEBERT CASSIDY WHITMORE 783.00 AP - 00282912 S/20/2009 LIEBERT CASSIDY WHITMORE 1,782.00 AP - 002829 ] 4 5/20/2009 LONCAR, PHILIP 130.00 AP - 00282921 S/20/2009 MARLINK AS INC 117.00 AP - 00282926 S/20/2009 MMASC 170.00 AP - 00282927 S/20/2009 MORGAN, BYRON SS9.32 AP - 00282928 S/20/2009 MOUNTAIN VIEW GLASS AND MIRROR INC 1 ] 1.92 AP - 00282943 S/20/2009 OFFICE DEPOT 44.46 AP - 00282943 S/20/2009 OFFICE DEPOT 460.28 AP - 00282943 S/20/2009 OFFICE DEPOT 53.42 AP - 00282943 S/20/2009 OFFICE DEPOT 2627 AP - 00282944 S/20/2009 ONTARIO, CITY OF ],147.02 P9 RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Register 5/13/2009 through 5/26/2009 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount P10 AP - 00282989 5/20/2009 SC FUELS 738.54 AP - 00282989 5/20/2009 SC FUELS 1,222.94 AP - 00282990 520/2009 SCOTT MCLEOD PLUMBING INC 310.22 AP - 00282990 5/20/2009 SCOTT MCLEOD PLUMBING INC 133.81 AP - 00283001 5/20/2009 SMART AND FINAL 74.25 AP - 00283001 5/20/2009 SMART AND FINAL 24.40 AP - 00283001 5/20/2009 SMART AND FINAL 12.20 AP - 00283002 5/20/2009 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 95.39 AP - 00283024 5/20/2009 TERMINIX PROCESSING CENTER 65.00 AP - 00283024 5/20/2009 TERMINIX PROCESSING CENTER 77.00 AP - 00283033 5/20/2009 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 58.72 AP - 00283041 5/20/2009 VERIZON BUSINESS 16.00 AP - 00283042 5/20/2009 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 789.34 AP - 00283042 5/20/2009 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 121.89 AP - 00283042 5/20/2009 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 182.99 AP - 00283042 5/20/2009 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 1,407.33 AP - 00283042 5/20/2009 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 82.15 AP - 00283042 5/20/2009 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 153.61 AP - 00283042 5/20/2009 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 152.36 AP - 00283043 5/20/2009 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 35.31 AP - 00283051 520/2009 VERIZON 35.12 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 37.82 AP - 00283059 5/20/2009 WELLS, ERIC 130.00 Total for Check ID AP: 27,019.78 EP - 00000408 5/20/2009 AHUMADA, ALEXANDER R 1,324.42 EP - 00000409 5/20/2009 ALMAND, LLOYD 708.20 EP - 00000410 5/20/2009 ARTHUR, VERA 179.16 EP - 00000411 5/20/2009 BANTAU, VICTORIA 369.69 EP - 00000412 5/20/2009 BAZAL, SUSAN 1,128.83 EP - 00000413 5/20/2009 BILLINGS, ESTER 240.44 EP - 00000414 5/20/2009 CARNES, KENNETH 675.04 EP - 00000415 5/20/2009 CORCORAN, ROBERT 1,294.74 EP - 00000416 5/20/2009 COX, GEORGE 459.32 EP - 00000417 5/20/2009 COX, KARL 708.20 EP - 00000418 5/20/2009 CRANE, RALPH 1,532.30 EP - 00000419 5/20/2009 CROSSLAND, WILBUR 459.32 EP - 00000420 5/20/2009 EAGLESON, MICHAEL 1,713.46 EP - 00000422 5/20/2009 FRITCHEY, JOHN D. 675.04 EP - 00000423 5/20/2009 HEYDE, DONALD 1,294.74 EP - 00000424 5/20/2009 INTERLICCHIA, ROSALYN 710.04 EP - 00000425 5/20/2009 KILMER, STEPHEN 1,713.46 EP - 00000426 5/20/2009 LANE, WILLIAM 1,713.46 EP - 00000427 5/20/2009 LEE, ALLAN 1,124.07 EP - 00000428 5/20/2009 LONGO, JOE 179.16 EP - 00000429 5/20/2009 LUTTRULL, DARRELL 675.04 EP - 00000430 5/20/2009 MACKALL, BENJAMIN 179.16 EP - 00000431 5/20/2009 MAYFIELD, RON 2,02229 EP - 00000432 5/20/2009 MCKEE, JOHN 2,022.29 EP - 00000433 5/20/2009 MCMILLEN, LINDA 430.60 EP - 00000434 5/20/2009 MCNEIL, KENNETH 1,294.74 EP - 00000435 5/20/2009 MICHAEL, L. DENNIS 1,294.74 EP - 00000436 5/20/2009 MYSKOW, DENNIS 675.04 EP - 00000437 5/20/2009 NAUMAN, MICHAEL 675.04 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 2 Current Date: 05/27/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Pornait Layout Time: 1128:5 RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT As>_enda Check Res=ister 5/13/2009 through 5/26/2009 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount EP - 00000438 5/20/2009 NEE, RON 2,022.29 EP - 00000439 5/20/2009 NELSON, MARY JANE 28702 EP - 00000440 5/20/2009 POST, MICHAEL R 1,265.22 EP - 00000441 5/20/2009 SALISBURY, THOMAS 1,294.74 EP - 00000442 5/20/2009 SMITH, RONALD 675.04 EP - 00000443 5/20/2009 SPAGNOLO, SAM 567.18 EP - 00000444 5/20/2009 SPAIN, WILLIAM 675.04 EP - 00000445 5/20/2009 SULLIVAN, JAMES 74922 EP - 00000446 5/20/2009 TAYLOR, STEVE 971.11 EP - 00000447 5/20/2009 TULEY, TERRY 1,294.74 EP - 00000448 5/20/2009 VANDERKALLEN, FRANCIS 1,294.74 EP - 00000449 5/20/2009 WALKER, KENNETH 303.60 EP - 00000450 5/20/2009 WOLFE, DUANE 1,532.30 EP - 00000451 5/20/2009 YOWELL, TIMOTHY A 2,022.29 Total for Check ID EP: 42,426.56 Total for Entity: 69,446.34 P11 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 3 Current Date: 05/27/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Pomait Layout Time: 11:28:5 STAFF REPORT RANCHO CtiCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Date: June 3, 2009 To: President and Members of the Board of Directors Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager From: Peter M. Bryan, Fire Chief By: Janet Walker, Management Analyst II RANCHO C,'UCAMONGA Subject: APPROVAL OF AN ANNEXATION MAP SHOWING ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMBER 0229-041-10 (SAN SEVAINE VILLAS), LOCATED ON SOUTHWEST CORNER OF FOOTHILL BLVD., AND HICKORY (vacated) AVE., PROPOSED TO BE ANNEXED INTO CFD NO. 85-1 RECOMMENDATION Adoption of a resolution adopting Annexation Map No 09-5 showing property (located on the southwest corner of Foothill Blvd., and Hickory (vacated) Ave.) proposed to be annexed into Community Facilities District (CFD) No. 85-1. BACKGROUND Northtown Housing Development Corporation, a California Nonprofit Public Benefit Corporation, owner of certain property (APN 0229-041-10) located within the Fire Protection District, is conditioned to annex into Community Facilities District (CFD) No. 85-1. In order to initiate formal proceedings to annex the referenced parcel into CFD No. 85-1, a Resolution adopting an annexation map is presented for Board consideration and approval. The annexation map (Exhibit "A") illustrates the territory proposed to be annexed. The territory is inclusive of the entire development project proposed by the owner. Respectfully submitted, ~~ Peter M. Bry Fire Chief P12 Attachments 0 E+ N ~Fy FG Q ~, C*.. ~ Q v o w ~ H O O ~ V y W4 ~ ~ P+ O ~ z~~~ ca '.. U " O ~;~~z ao~ Hw~~ < V ~ z ~~o~ ~~O U ~+ .~ x ~ r' C U 3~V 1Sd3 O C W J O D] a zT a ~ W O s a.~ ~'~ o v N o m a F z w 0 a a ~ ~ c NI ( ~ p- ' rn o~~~N, i ~~~ w.of1 0 0 1iyJ,~,''~Sd.~ `~ `~ S EXHIBIT', M/b '4'~'~'~'8'S O 1S ~ _ 1S IlVMN210~ IlYMN210~~ C7 H1NON-0n °m z 0 U U V 3~ B a~ oG to ar cg a a p~3 p6 :aa Yg`Gi 8 o D Y ~~ „ s gaW° za lto ~~~a: ,s ~~~~ExE~§'S ~~°gug~~aa~~ :3a ''•` 7II u ~ ~2gk~ *~5~g &d~oo~:m8:a C ~ t ~ ~ ~ 3 9a a z a b F y~ ~ S ~ ~ a . 3 ~ . ~~° ~ 7~a' a S°3 3~~F m ~~u~ ~_ ~3~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~~ a e o ~~ ~o >~ ~i ~g 3 P14 RESOLUTION NO. FD 09-O,ZO A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACTING AS THE LEGISLATIVE BODY OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1, ADOPTING AN ANNEXATION MAP (ANNEXATION NO. 09-5) SHOWING PROPERTY PROPOSED TO BE ANNEXED TO COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1 WHEREAS, the BOARD OF DIRECTORS of the RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT (the "Board of Directors'), desires to initiate proceedings to annex territory to an existing Community Facilities District pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982", being Chapter 2.5, Part 1, Division 2, Title 5 of the Government Code of the State of California, and specifically Article 3.5 thereof. The existing Community Facilities District has been designated as COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1 (the "District"); and, WHEREAS, there has been submitted a map entitled "Annexation Map No. 09-5 to Community Facilities District No. 85-1, Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, County of San Bernardino, State Of California" (the "Annexation Map") showing the territory proposed to be annexed to the District (the "Territory"). NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District does hereby resolve as follows: SECTION 1: The above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2: The Annexation Map showing the Territory proposed to be annexed to the District and to be subject to the levy of a special tax is hereby approved and adopted. SECTION 3: A certificate shall be endorsed on the original and on at least one (1) copy of the Annexation Map, evidencing the date and adoption of this Resolution, and within fifteen (15) days after the adoption of the Resolution fixing the time and place of the hearing on the intention to annex or extent of the annexation to the District, a copy of such map shall be filed with the correct and proper endorsements thereon with the County Recorder, all in the manner and form provided for in Section 3111 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California. P15 Resolution No. FD 09- Page 2 PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this day of , 2009. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: Donald J. Kurth, M.D., President ATTEST: Janice C. Reynolds, Secretary I, JANICE C. REYNOLDS, SECRETARY of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, at a regular meeting of said Board held on the _ day of 2009. Executed this _ day of 2009 at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Janice C. Reynolds, Secretary STAFF REPORT RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT RANCHO Date: June 3, 2009 C',UCAMONGA To: President and Members of the Board of Directors Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager From: Peter M. Bryan, Fire Chief By: Janet Walker, Management Analyst II Subject: APPROVAL TO ADOPT A RESOLUTION OF INTENTION TO ANNEX TERRITORY REFERRED TO AS ANNEXATION N0.09b (APN: 0229{141-10 (SAN SEVAINE VILLAS) INTO COMMUNITY FAgLfTIES DISTRICT N0.8S1, SPEgFYING SERVICES PROPOSED TO BE FlNANCED, TO SEi AND SPEgFY THE SPECIAL TAXES PROPOSED TO BE LEVIED WITFAN THE ANNEXATION TERRfTORYAND SETATIME AND PLACE FORA PUBLIC HEARING RELATED TO THE ANNEXATION RECOMMENDATION Adoption of a Resolution of Intention to Annex Territory referred to as Annexation No. 09-5 into Community Facilities District No. 85-1 (the "District"), to specify the services to be financed, to set and specify the rate and method of apportionment of the special taxes proposed to be levied within the territory proposed to be annexed and to set a time and place for a public hearing regarding the annexation. BACKGROUND Northtown Housing Development Corporation, a California Nonprofit Public Benefit Corporation, owner of certain property (APN 0229-041-10) within the Fire Protection District (the "Territory"), is conditioned by the City and Fire Protection District to annex such property into the existing Community Facilities District (CFD) No. 85-1 to satisfy fire protection service mitigation impacts. In order to initiate formal annexation proceedings, the Fire Board is being asked to adopt a resolution approving an annexation map of the territory proposed to be annexed and a Resolution of Intention to Annex. The Resolution of Intention generally sets forth: (a) the District's intention to annex the Territory to the District; (b) the services which will, in part, be financed (Exhibit "A" of said Resolution) through the levy of the special tax on the Territory if annexed; (d) the rate and method of apportionment of the proposed special tax (Exhibit "B" of said Resolution); (e) the date, time and location of the public hearing set for July 15, 2009 and (f) election requirements. P16 Warren Diven, Special Counsel for the District, has worked with staff to establish the annexation process, timelines and draft resolutions. The resolution is considered to be P17 RESOLUTION OF IN'I'ENTTON TO ANNEX .TUNE 3, 2009 routine and non-controversial, as the developers are in support of the annexation procedure. On July 15, 2009, there will be a public hearing for public input/concerns on this matter. Ily submitted, Peter M. B Fire Chief Attachment P18 RESOLUTION NO. FD 09- Oz J A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACTING AS THE LEGISLATIVE BODY OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO AUTHORIZE THE ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY (ANNEXATION NO. 09-5) TO COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1 WHEREAS, the BOARD OF DIRECTORS of the RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, CALIFORNIA, ("Board of Directors"), formed a Community Facilities District pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982", being Chapter 2.5, Part 1, Division 2, Title 5 of the Government Code of the State of California (the "Act"). The Community Facilities District has been designated as COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1 (the "District"); and, WHEREAS, the Board of Directors desires to initiate proceedings to consider the annexation of certain real property to the District (the "Territory"); and WHEREAS, a map entitled "Annexation Map No. 09-5 to Community Facilities District No. 85-1 Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, County of San Bernardino, State of California" (the "Annexation Map") showing the Territory proposed to be annexed to the District has been submitted, which map has been previously approved and a copy of the map shall be kept on file with the transcript of these proceedings; and WHEREAS, this Board of Directors now desires to proceed to adopt its Resolution of Intention to annex the Territory to District, to describe the territory included within District and the Territory proposed to be annexed thereto, to specify the services to be financed from the proceeds of the levy of special taxes within the Territory, to set and specify the special taxes that would be levied within the Territory to finance such services, and to set a time and place for a public hearing relating to the annexation of the Territory to the District. NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District does hereby resolve as follows: RECITALS SECTION 1: The above recitals are all true and correct. LEGAL AUTHORITY SECTION 2: These proceedings for annexation are initiated by this Board of Directors pursuant to the authorization of the Act. INTENTION TO ANNEX; DESCRIPTION OF TERRITORY AND THE DISTRICT SECTION 3. This legislative body hereby determines that the public convenience and necessity requires that the Territory be added to the District and this Board of Directors declares its intention to annex the Territory to the District. A description of the Territory is as follows: P19 Resolution No. 09- Page -2- All that property within the Territory proposed to be annexed to the District, as such property is shown on the Annexation Map as previously approved by this legislative body, a copy of which is on f le in the Office of the Secretary and shall remain open for public inspection. A general description of the territory included in the District is hereinafter described as follows: All that property and territory as originally included within the District and as subsequently annexed to the District, as such properties were shown on maps of the original District and the territories subsequently annexed to the District, all as approved by this Board of Directors and designated by the name of the original District. Copies of such maps are on file in the Office of the Secretary and have also been filed in the Office of the County Recorder. SERVICES AUTHORIZED TO BE FINANCED BY THE DISTRICT SECTION 4: The services that are authorized to be financed by the District from the proceeds of special taxes levied within the District (the "Services") are generally described in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. The District shall finance all direct, administrative and incidental annual costs and expenses necessary to provide the Services. The Services authorized to be financed by the District from the proceeds of special taxes levied within District are the types of services to be provided in the Territory. If and to the extent possible the Services shall be provided in common within the District and the Territory. P20 Resolution No. 09- Page -3- SPECIAL TAXES SECTION 5: It is the further intention of this Board of Directors body that, except where funds are otherwise available, a special tax sufficient to pay for the Services and related incidental expenses authorized by the Act, secured by recordation of a continuing lien against all non-exempt real property in the Territory, will be levied annually within the boundaries of such Territory. For further particulars as to the rate and method of apportionment of the proposed special tax, reference is made to Exhibit B (the "Special Tax Formula"), which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference and which sets forth insufficient detail the method of apportionment of such special tax to allow each landowner or resident within the proposed Territory to clearly estimate the maximum amount that such person will have to pay. The special tax proposed to be levied within the Territory shall be equal to the special tax levied to pay for the Services in the District, except that a higher or lower special tax may be levied within the Territory to the extent that the actual cost of providing the Services in the Territory is higher or lower than the cost of providing those Services in the original District. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the special tax may not be levied at a rate which is higher than the maximum special tax authorized to be levied pursuant to the Special Tax Formula. The special taxes herein authorized shall be collected in the same manner as ad valorem property taxes and shall be subject to the same penalties, procedure, sale and lien priority in any case of delinquency, as applicable for ad valorem taxes; however, as applicable, this legislative body may, by resolution, establish and adopt an alternate or supplemental procedure as necessary. Any special taxes that may not be collected on the County tax roll shall be collected through a direct billing procedure by the Treasurer of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, acting for and on behalf of the District. Upon recordation of a. Notice of Special Tax Lien pursuant to Section 3114.5 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, a continuing lien to secure each levy of the special tax shall attach to all non-exempt real property in the Territory and this lien shall continue in force and effect until the special tax obligation is prepaid and permanently satisfied and the lien canceled in accordance with law or until collection of the tax by the legislative body ceases. The maximum special tax rate authorized to be levied within the District shall not be increased as a result of the annexation of the Territory to the District. P21 Resolution No. 09- Page -4- PUBLIC HEARING SECTION 6: NOTICE IS GIVEN THAT ON THE 15th DAY OF JULY2009, AT THE HOUR OF 7:00 O'CLOCK P.M., IN THE REGULAR MEETING PLACE OF THE LEGISLATIVE BODY, BEING THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD WHERE THIS LEGISLATIVE BODY WILL CONSIDER THE AUTHORIZATION FOR THE ANNEXATION OF THE TERRITORY TO THE DISTRICT, THE PROPOSED RATE AND METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT OF THE SPECIAL TAX TO BE LEVIED WITHIN THE TERRITORY AND ALL OTHER MATTERS AS SET FORTH IN THIS RESOLUTION OF INTENTION. AT SUCH PUBLIC HEARING, THE TESTIMONY OF ALL INTERESTED PERSONS FOR OR AGAINST THE ANNEXATION OF THE TERRITORY OR THE LEVYING OF SPECIAL TAXES WITHIN THE TERRITORY WILL BE HEARD. AT SUCH PUBLIC HEARING, PROTESTS AGAINST THE PROPOSED ANNEXATION OF THE TERRITORY, THE LEVY OF SPECIAL TAXES W ITHIN THE TERRITORY OR ANY OTHER PROPOSALS CONTAINED IN THIS RESOLUTION MAY BE MADE ORALLY BY ANY INTERESTED PERSON. ANY PROTESTS PERTAINING TO THE REGULARITY OR SUFFICIENCY OF THE PROCEEDINGS SHALL BE IN WRITING AND SHALL CLEARLY SET FORTH THE IRREGULARITIES OR DEFECTS TO WHICH OBJECTION IS MADE. ALL WRITTEN PROTESTS SHALL BE FILED WITH THE SECRETARY PRIOR TO THE TIME FIXED FOR THE PUBLIC HEARING. WRITTEN PROTESTS MAY BE WITHDRAWN AT ANY TIME BEFORE THE CONCLUSION OF THE PUBLIC HEARING. P22 Resolution No. 09- Page -5- MAJORITY PROTEST SECTION 7: If (a) 50% or more of the registered voters, or six (6) registered voters, whichever is more, residing within the District, (b) 50% or more of the registered voters, or six (6) registered voters, whichever is more, residing within the Territory, (c) owners of one-half or more of the area of land in the territory included in the District, or (d)owners of one-half or more of the area of land included in the Territory, fle written protests against the proposed annexation of the Territory to the District and such protests are not withdrawn so as to reduce the protests to less than a majority, no further proceedings shall be undertaken for a period of one year from the date of the decision by the Board of Directors on the issues discussed at the public hearing. ELECTION SECTION 8: Upon the conclusion of the public hearing, if the legislative body determines to proceed with the annexation, a proposition shall be submitted to the qualified electors of the Territory. The vote shall be by registered voters within the Territory; however, if there are less than 12 registered voters, the vote shall be by landowners, with each landowner having one vote per acre or portion thereof within the Territory. NOTICE SECTION 9: Notice of the time and place of the public hearing shall be given by the Secretary by publication in a legally designated newspaper of general circulation, said publication pursuant to Section 6061 of the Government Code, with said publication to be completed at least seven (7) days prior to the date set for the public hearing. A copy of this Resolution shall be transmitted to the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as required by the Act. P23 Resolution No. 09- Page -6- PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this day of , 2009. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: Donald J. Kurth, M.D., President ATTEST: Janice C. Reynolds, Secretary I, JANICE C. REYNOLDS, SECRETARY of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, at a regular meeting of said Board held on the _ day of 2009. Executed this day of 2009, at Rancho Cucamonga, California Janice C. Reynolds, Secretary P24 Resolution No. 09- Page -7- EXHIBIT 'A' COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1 DESCRIPTION OF THE SERVICES The performance by employees of functions, operations, maintenance and repair activities in order to provide fire protection and suppression services. P25 Resolution No. 09- Page -8- EXHIBIT 'B' COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1 ANNEXATION NO. 09-5 RATE AND METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT OF SPECIAL TAXES The rate and method of apportionment, limitations on and adjustment to the Special Tax shall be as follows: To pay for fire suppression services and to finance fire suppression facilities, the Maximum Special Tax in Community Facilities District No. 85-1, Annexation No. 09-5 for Fiscal Year 2008-2009 shall be: Structures Maximum Annual Special Tax Residential 1 DU = ($148.04) , Multi-Family 2 DU: 1.75 = ($148.04) 3 DU: 2.25 = ($148.04) 4 DU: 2.65 = ($148.04) 5-14 DU: 2.65 = ($148.04) + {.35 (TU-4) ($148.04)} 15-30 DU: 6.15 = ($148.04) + {.30 (TU-14) ($148.04)} 31-80 DU: 10.65 = ($148.04) + {.25 (TU-30) ($148.04)} 81 - up DU: 23.15 = ($148.04) + {.20 (TU-80) ($148.04)} Commercial ($148.04) per acre + $.080 per SF Industrial ($148.04) per acre + $.098 per SF Note: DU =Dwelling Unit TU =Total Units SF =Square Foot ANNUAL ADJUSTMENT The maximum Special Tax shall be annually adjusted commencing on July 1, 2008 and each July 1 s` thereafter for (a) changes in the cost of living or (b) changes in cost of living and changes in population as defined in Section 7901 of the Government Code, as amended, whichever is lesser. P26 Resolution No. 09- Page -9- REDUCTION IN SPECIAL TAX Commercial and industrial structures shall be granted a .01 cent reduction in the Special Tax for the installation of complete sprinkler systems. In addition, multi-floor commercial and industrial structures shall also be granted a .01 cent reduction (not cumulative) in Special Tax for each separate floor above or below the main ground floor of the structure. LIMITATION ON SPECIAL TAX LEVY The Special Tax shall only be levied on Developed Property. Developed Property is defined to be property: which is not owned by a public or governmental agency; which is not vacant; - where a "certificate of occupancy" or "utility release" from the City of Rancho Cucamonga has been issued; which has an existing building or structure onsite; - which does not have as its sole use power transmission towers, railroad tracks, and flood control facilities. Areas granted as easements for such purposes shall be subtracted from the total acreage of the underlying lot. The annual levy of the Special Tax shall be based upon an annual determination by the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District of the amount of other revenues available to meet budget requirements. As used in this formula, "available revenue" shall include ad valorem taxes, State of California augmentation, tax increment revenues received from the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and any other source of revenue except the Special Tax. The Board of Directors shall take all responsible steps to retain maximum Redevelopment Agency funding to which, by agreement, they may lawfully receive. To the extent available revenues are insufficient to meet budget requirements, the Board of Directors may levy the Special Tax. For further particulars regarding the rate and method of apportionment of the Special Tax, reference is made to the Final Report Mello-Roos Community Facilities District No. 85-1 for Fire Suppression Facilities/Services -Foothill Fire Protection District, a copy of which is on file in the office of the Fire Chief of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District. P27 STAFF REPORT RANCHO CYJCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Date: June 3, 2009 To: President and Members of the Board of Directors Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager From: Peter M. Bryan, Fire Chief By: Janet Walker, Management Analyst II ~~ ~- RANCHO CUCAMONGA Subject: ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION DECLARING RESULTS OF A SPECIAL ELECTION IN COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1, ANNEXATION NO. 09-3 AND ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF SUCH PROPERTY TO COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1 (NORWALK BLVD. BAPTIST CHURCH -APN 1100-051-03) RECOMMENDATION Consideration of approval of a resolution declaring results of a special election in Community Facilities District No. 85-1, Annexation No. 09-3 and ordering the annexation of property of approximately 1.03 acres located at 7384 East Ave. (the "Annexation Territory") to Community Facilities District No. 85-1. BACKGROUND On March 18, 2009, the Board declared its intention to annex APN: 1100-051-03 into CFD No. 85-1. On May 6, 2009, a public hearing was held regarding the annexation and following such public hearing, the Board of Directors adopted a resolution calling for a special election to submit the qualified electors of the Annexation Territory a ballot measure pertaining to the authorization to levy a special tax within the Annexation Territory. A special election was scheduled for May 13, 2009. On May 13, 2009, the landowner submitted their ballot to the Board Secretary. The Board Secretary has canvassed the ballot and completed the statement of votes cast (see Exhibit "A" of Resolution). The Landowner cast their vote unanimously in favor of the levy of the special tax in the Annexation Territory. Adoption of this resolution constitutes the formal action of the Board declaring the results of the election and the annexation of the Annexation Territory to Community Facilities District No. 85-1 and directs the recordation of an amendment to the existing Notice of Special Tax Lien. By recordation of this amendment, prospective purchasers of property within the Annexation Territory will have notice of the special tax obligation affecting such property. Res ctfully submitted, Peter M. Bry Fire Chief Attachment P28 RESOLUTION NO. FD 09-OZZ A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACTING AS THE LEGISLATIVE BODY OF COMMUNITY FACILTIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1, DECLARING THE RESULTS OF A SPECIAL ELECTION IN COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1, ANNEXATION NO. 09-3 AND ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF SUCH PROPERTY TO COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1 WHEREAS, the Board of Directors (the "Board") of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, California, has previously declared its intention and held and conducted proceedings relating to the annexation of territory to an existing Community Facilities District pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982", being Chapter 2.5, Part 1, Division 2, Title 5 of the Government Code of the State of California, and specifically Article 3.5 thereof. The existing Community Facilities District has been designated as COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1 (the "District"); and, WHEREAS, the area proposed to be annexed is known and designated as COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1, ANNEXATION NO. 09-3 ("Annexation Territory"), and, WHEREAS, the Board did call for and order to be held an election to submit to the qualified voters of the Annexation Territory a proposition to levy a special tax in the Annexation Territory; and, WHEREAS, at this time said election has been held and the measure voted upon did receive the favorable 2/3's vote of the qualified voters, and the Board desires to declare the favorable results of the election and to order the annexation of the Annexation Territory to the District. NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District does hereby resolve as follows: SECTION 1. The above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2. The Board hereby receives and approves the CERTIFICATE OF ELECTION OFFICIAL AND STATEMENT OF VOTES CAST, as submitted by the Election Official, said Statement setting forth the number of votes cast in the election, the measure voted upon, and the number of votes given for and/or against the measure voted upon. A copy of said Certificate and Statement is attached hereto marked Exhibit "A", referenced and so incorporated. SECTION 3. The Secretary is hereby directed to enter in the minutes of this meeting the results of the election and the STATEMENT OF VOTES CAST. SECTION 4. The Board hereby orders the annexation of the Annexation Territory to the District and further determines that the Board is now authorized to levy the special taxes within the Annexation Territory as approved and authorized by the qualified electors of the Annexation Territory. P29 SECTION 5. Immediately upon adoption of this Resolution, the AMENDMENT TO THE NOTICE OF SPECIAL TAX LIEN (NOTICE OF ANNEXATION) shall be recorded in the Office of the County Recorder. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this _ day of , 2009. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: Donald J. Kurth, M.D., President ATTEST: Janice C. Reynolds, Secretary I, JANICE C. REYNOLDS, SECRETARY of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, at a regular meeting of said Board held on the day of 2009. Executed this _ day of 2009, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Janice C. Reynolds, Secretary P30 CERTIFICATE OF ELECTION OFFICIAL AND STATEMENT OF VOTES CAST STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO )SS RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT ) THE UNDERSIGNED, AS ELECTION OFFICIAL OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that pursuant to the provisions of Section 53326 of the Government Code and the Elections Code of the State of California, I did canvass the returns of the votes cast at the: RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1 ANNEXATION NO. 09-3 SPECIAL ELECTION In said Fire Protection District held on May 13, 2009 I FURTHER CERTIFY that this Statement of Votes Cast shows the whole number of votes case in said District, and the whole number of votes cast For the Measure in said District, and the totals of the respective columns and the totals as shown for the Measure are full, tme and correct. I. TOTAL NUMBER OF VOTES CAST: II. TOTAL NUMBER OF VOTES FOR FOR AND AGAINST PROPOSITION A AGAINST WITNESS my hand and official Seal this t `'i+`' day of~, 2009. ~~~ Ele ion Official Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District State of California MEMORANDUM CITY CLERKS OFFICE Date: June 3, 2009 To: Chairman and Members of the Redevelopment Agency President and Members of the Fire Board Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, City Manager From: Debra L. McKay, MMC Assistant City Clerk/Records Manager Subject: Approval of a Resolution Changing the Time of Closed Session RANCHO IcUCAMONGA RECOMMENDATION It is recommended the Redevelopment Agency/Fire Board/City Council approve the attached Resolution changing the time of Closed Session to 5:00 p.m. BACKGROUND(ANALYSIS Currently, the Redevelopment Agency/Fire Board/City Council Closed Session starts at 5:30 p.m. A Resolution has been prepared changing the time to 5:00 p.m. in order to ensure the participation of all members. Res ecttully submitted, '~~~~ De a L. McKay, MMC Assistant City Clerk/Records Manager P31 Attachment (as noted) P32 RESOLUTION NO. FD 09- 023 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DETERMINING THE DAYS, TIME AND PLACE OF REGULAR MEETINGS OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District does hereby resolve as follows: SECTION 1: Regular Meetings of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District shall be held in the Council Chambers at the Civic Center complex located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California, on the first and third Wednesday of each month. Each such regular meeting, commencing with the meeting of May 20, 2009, shall commence at 5:00 p.m. in the Tapia Room on the upper level of the Civic Center for purposes of conducting an Executive Session only. The remainder of each such meeting shall commence and be conducted at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the Civic Center. SECTION 2: Said regular meeting shall continue to occur on the first and third Wednesday of each month in the Council Chambers as stated above. Please see the following page for formal adoption, certification and signatures P33 Resolution FD No. 09-*** Page 2 of 2 PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 3rd day of June 2009. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: Donald J. Kurth, M.D., President ATTEST: C. Reynolds, Secretary I, JANICE C. REYNOLDS, SECRETARY of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved and adopted by the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District at a Regular Meeting held on the 3`d day of June 2009. Executed this 4`h day of June 2009, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Janice C. Reynolds, Secretary CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P34 Agenda Check Resister 5/13/2009 through 5/26/2009 Check tio. Check Date Vendor iVame Amount AP - 00282502 5/L3/2009 A & I REPROGRAPHICS 43. ] 7 AP - 00282502 5/13/2009 A & I REPROGRAPHICS 128.65 AP - 00282502 5/13/2009 A & I REPROGRAPHICS 33.35 AP - 00282503 5/13/2009 ABI VIP ATTORNEY SERVICE 95.86 AP - 00282503 5/13/2009 ABI V1P ATTORNEY SERVICE 128.66 AP - 00282503 5/13/2009 ABI VIP ATTORNEY SERVICE 113.28 AP - 00282503 5/13/2009 ABI VIP ATTORNEY SERVICE 123.22 AP - 00282503 5/13/2009 ABI VIP ATTORNEY SERVICE 123.22 AP - 00282503 5/13/2009 ABI VIP ATTORNEY SERVICE 113.28 AP - 00282503 5/13/2009 ABI VIP ATTORNEY SERVICE 95.86 AP - 00282503 5/13/2009 ABI VIP ATTORNEY SERVICE 95.86 AP - 00282503 5/13/2009 ABI VIP ATTORNEY SERVICE 95.86 AP - 00282503 5/13/2009 ABI VIP ATTORNEY SERVICE 113.28 AP - 00282503 5/13/2009 ABI VIP ATTORNEY SERVICE 113.28 AP - 00282503 5/13/2009 ABI VIP ATTORNEY SERVICE 113.28 AP - 00282503 5/13/2009 ABI VIP ATTORNEY SERVICE 118.72 AP - 00282503 5/13/2009 ABI VIP ATTORNEY SERVICE 96.03 AP - 00282503 5/13/2009 ABI VIP ATTORNEY SERVICE 123.22 AP - 00282503 5/13/2009 ABI VIP ATTORNEY SERVICE 123.22 AP - 00282503 5/13/2009 ABI VIP ATTORNEY SERVICE 96.03 AP - 00282503 5/13/2009 ABI VIP ATTORNEY SERVICE 96.03 AP - 00282503 5/13/2009 ABI VIP ATTORNEY SERVICE 96.03 AP - 00282505 S/13/2009 ABM JANITORIAL SW 5,189.72 AP - 00282505 5/13/2009 ABM JANITORIAL SW 293.44 AP - 00282505 5/13/2009 ABM JANITORIAL SW 902.77 AP - 00282505 S/13/2009 ABM JANITORIAL SW 293.44 AP - 00282505 5/13/2009 ABM JANITORIAL SW 3,693.40 AP - 00282506 5/13/2009 ACCOMODATING IDEAS INC. 343.43 AP - 00282507 5/13/2009 AGENCY FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS INC. 3,000.00 AP - 00282507 5/13/2009 AGENCY FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS INC. -210.00 AP - 00282508 5/13/2009 AGENCY FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS INC. 1,000.00 AP - 00282509 S/13/2009 AGUILERA, ISAIAH 252.00 AP - 00282510 S/13/2009 AIRGAS WEST 55.93 AP - 0028251 ] S/13/2009 ALL CITY MANAGEMENT SERVICES INC. 10,315.22 AP - 002825 ] 2 5/13/2009 ALLSTAR AIR CONDITIONING & HEATING 269.00 AP - 00282514 5/13/2009 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL ] 00.00 AP - 00282514 5/13/2009 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50.00 AP - 00282514 5/13/2009 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50.00 AP - 00282514 5/13/2009 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 100.00 AP - 00282514 5/13/2009 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 100.00 AP - 00282514 5/13/2009 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL ]00.00 AP - 00282514 5/13/2009 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50.00 AP - 00282514 5/13/2009 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50.00 AP - 00282514 5/13/2009 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50.00 AP - 00282514 5/13/2009 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50.00 AP - 00282514 5/13/2009 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 100.00 AP - 00282514 5/13/2009 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 100.00 AP - 00282514 5/13/2009 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 100.00 AP - 00282514 5/13'2009 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 100.00 AP - 002825 ] 4 S/13/2009 ALTA LO.'vIA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50.00 AP - 00282514 5/t 3/2009 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 100.00 AP - 00282514 S/13/2009 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 100.00 AP - 00282514 5/13/2009 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50.00 AP - 00282514 S/13/2009 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50.00 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 1 Current Dale: 05/27/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_ REG_PORTRAI T_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Pomait Layout Time: 11:26:2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P35 Aeenda Check Register 5/13/2009 through 5/26/2009 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00282514 5/13/2009 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 100.00 AP - 00282514 5/13/2009 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 100.00 AP - 00282514 5/13/2009 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 100.00 AP - 00282514 5/13/2009 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50.00 AP - 00282514 5/13/2009 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50.00 AP - 00282514 5/13/2009 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 100.00 AP - 00282514 5/13/2009 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 100.00 AP - 00282514 5/13/2009 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 25.00 AP - 00282514 5/13/2009 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 100.00 AP - 00282514 5/13/2009 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 100.00 AP - 00282514 5/13/2009 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 100.00 AP - 00282514 5/13/2009 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 100.00 AP - 00282514 5/13/2009 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 100.00 AP - 00282514 5/13/2009 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50.00 AP - 00282514 5/13/2009 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 25.00 AP - 00282514 5/13/2009 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 100.00 AP - 00282514 5/13/2009 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 100.00 AP - 00282514 5/13/2009 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 100.00 AP - 00282514 5/13/2009 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50.00 AP - 00282514 5/13/2009 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50.00 AP - 00282514 5/13/2009 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 100.00 AP - 00282514 5/13/2009 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50.00 AP - 00282514 5/13/2009 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 100.00 AP - 00282514 5/13/2009 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50.00 AP - 00282514 5/13/2009 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 100.00 AP - 00282514 5/13/2009 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50.00 AP - 00282514 5/13/2009 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 100.00 AP - 00282514 5/13/2009 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 100.00 AP - 00282515 5/13/2009 AMTECH ELEVATOR SERVICES 233.71 AP - 00282516 5/13/2009 ANIMAL CARE EQUIPMENT AND SERVICES (A( 345.00 AP - 00282516 5/13/2009 ANIMAL CARE EQUIPMENT AND SERVICES (A( 5.00 AP - 00282516 5/13/2009 ANIMAL CARE EQUIPMENT AND SERVICES (A( 10.91 AP - 00282517 5/13/2009 ANTECH DIAGNOSTICS 1,310.86 AP - 00282518 5/13/2009 AQUINQ, MELISSA 66.00 AP - 00282519 5/13/2009 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES 6.70 AP - 00282520 5/13/2009 ARCHIBALD PET HOSPITAL 2,000.00 AP - 00282520 5/13/2009 ARCHIBALD PET HOSPITAL 2,300.00 AP - 00282520 5/13/2009 ARCHIBALD PET HOSPITAL 2,200.00 AP - 00282520 5/13/2009 ARCHIBALD PET HOSPITAL 825.00 AP - 00282521 5/13/2009 ARCHITERRA DESIGN OROUP 11,271.00 AP - 00282521 5/13/2009 ARCHITERRA DESIGN GROUP 99.72 AP - 00282522 5/13/2009 AROSTEGUI, KISSETTE 18.00 AP - 00282523 5/13/2009 ARROW TRUCK BODIES AND EQUIPMENT INC 577.17 AP - 00282524 5/13/2009 ATLAS TESTING LABORATORIES INC. 525.00 AP - 00282525 5/13/2009 AUTO BODY 2000 341.68 AP - 00282526 5/13/2009 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 223.07 AP - 00282527 5/13/2009 B.A.H.S. 55.35 AP - 00282527 5/13/2009 B.A.H.S. 14.71 AP - 00282527 5/13/2009 B.A.H.S. 1,498.77 AP-00282527 5/13/2009 B.A.H.S. 153.03 AP - 00282527 5/13/2009 B.A.H.S. 649.20 AP - 00282527 5/13/2009 B.A.H.S. 4.61 AP - 00282527 5/13/2009 B.A.H.S. -41.76 AP - 00282529 5/13/2009 BANC OF AMERICA LEASING 8,948.44 User: VLOPEZ-Veronica Lopez Page: 2 Current Date: 05/27/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_R EG_PORTRAI T_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Pomait Layout Time: 11:26:2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P36 Agenda Check Register $/13/2009 through 5/26/2009 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00282529 $/13/2009 BANC OF AMERICA LEASING 749.94 AP - 00282529 $/13/2009 BANC OF AMERICA LEASING 393.54 AP - 00282529 5/13/2009 BANC OF AMERICA LEASING 1,124.91 AP - 00282530 5/13/2009 BANC OF AMERICA LEASING 390.82 AP - 00282530 $/13/2009 BANC OF AMERICA LEASING 195.03 AP - 00282531 $/13/2009 BARNES AND NOBLE 875.65 AP - 00282531 $/13/2009 BARNES AND NOBLE 136.06 AP - 00282531 $/13/2009 BARNES AND NOBLE 1,511.56 AP - 00282531 $/13/2009 BARNES AND NOBLE 136.05 AP - 00282531 5'13/2009 BARNES AND NOBLE 385.41 AP - 00282531 5/13/2009 BARNES AND NOBLE 520.17 AP - 00282532 $/13/2009 BELTRAN, OSUALDO 10.00 AP - 00282534 5/13/2009 BIOMECHANICAL RESEARCH AND TESTING LL 330.00 AP - 00282$3$ 5/13/2009 BLUESILVER VIDEO PRODUCTIONS 169.00 AP - 00282536 5/13/2009 BOWMAN, BRIANNE 120.00 AP - 00282541 5/13/2009 BRODART BOOKS 9.60 AP - 00282541 $/13/2009 BRODART BOOKS 53.79 AP - 00282541 $/13/2009 BRODART BOOKS 28.83 AP - 00282541 $/13/2009 BRODART BOOKS 22.47 AP - 00282541 5/13/2009 BRODART BOOKS 74.73 AP - 00282541 5/13/2009 BRODART BOOKS 14.10 AP - 00282541 5/13/2009 BRODART BOOKS 9.60 AP - 00282541 $/13/2009 BRODART BOOKS 64.05 AP - 00282541 $/ 13/2009 BRODART BOOKS 27.36 AP - 00282541 5/13/2009 BRODART BOOKS 97.84 AP - 00282541 5/13/2009 BRODART BOOKS 28.22 AP - 00282541 S/] 3/2009 BRODART BOOKS 59.56 AP - 00282541 $/13/2009 BRODART BOOKS 25.40 AP - 00282541 $/13/2009 BRODART BOOKS 19.56 AP - 00282541 5/13/2009 BRODART BOOKS 15.82 AP - 00282541 5/13/2009 BRODART BOOKS 8.65 AP - 00282541 $/13/2009 BRODART BOOKS 23.45 AP - 00282541 5/13/2009 BRODART BOOKS 41.06 AP - 00282541 5/13/2009 BRODART BOOKS 59.26 AP - 00282541 $/13/2009 BRODART BOOKS 37.76 AP - 00282541 $/13/2009 BRODART BOOKS 92.42 AP - 00282541 5/13/2009 BRODART BOOKS 76.65 AP - 00282541 $/13/2009 BRODART BOOKS 468.26 AP - 00282541 5/13/2009 BRODART BOOKS 14.10 AP - 00282541 >~13/2009 BRODART BOOKS 39.01 AP - 00282541 5/13/2009 BRODART BOOKS 14.69 AP - 00282541 5/13/2009 BRODART BOOKS 112.42 AP - 00282541 5/] 3/2009 BRODART BOOKS 39.90 AP - 00282541 $/13/2009 BRODART BOOKS 40.53 AP - 00282541 $/13/2009 BRODART BOOKS 4129 AP - 00282$41 $/13/2009 BRODART BOOKS 76.92 AP - 00282541 5/13/2009 BRODART BOOKS 128.89 AP - 00282541 S/] 3/2009 BRODART BOOKS 12.16 AP - 00282541 $/13/2009 BRODART BOOKS 780.10 AP - 00282541 $/13/2009 BRODART BOOKS 3.95 AP - 00282541 5/13/2009 BRODART BOOKS 77.42 AP - 00282541 $/13/2009 BRODART BOOKS 4.30 AP - 00282541 5/13/2009 BRODART BOOKS 36.58 AP - 00282541 $/13/2009 BRODART BOOKS 64.50_ User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 3 Current Date: 05/27/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_ REG _PORTRAI T_RC - CK: Aeenda Check Register Pomait Layout Time: 11:26:2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Re>?ister 5/13/2009 through 5/26/2009 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00282541 5/13/2009 BRODART BOOKS 107.73 AP - 00282541 5/13/2009 BRODART BOOKS 6.48 AP - 00282541 5/13/2009 BRODART BOOKS 12.96 AP - 00282541 5/13/2009 BRODART BOOKS 45.24 AP - 00282541 5/13/2009 BRODART BOOKS 64.50 AP - 00282541 5/13/2009 BRODART BOOKS 6.48 AP - 00282541 5/13/2009 BRODART BOOKS 51.64 AP - 00282541 5/13/2009 BRODART BOOKS 12.90 AP - 00282541 5/13/2009 BRODART BOOKS 19.44 AP - 00282541 5/13/2009 BRODART BOOKS 15.08 AP - 00282541 5/13/2009 BRODART BOOKS 23.74 AP - 00282541 S/13/2009 BRODART BOOKS 17.19 AP - 00282541 5/13/2009 BRODART BOOKS 12.96 AP - 00282541 5/13/2009 BRODART BOOKS 4.30 AP - 00282541 5/13/2009 BRODART BOOKS 8.60 AP - 0028254] 5/13/2009 BRODART BOOKS 6.48 AP - 00282541 5/13/2009 BRODART BOOKS 8.60 AP - 00282541 5/13/2009 BRODART BOOKS 6.48 AP - 00282541 5/13/2009 BRODART BOOKS 10.78 AP - 00282541 5/13/2009 BRODART BOOKS 15.08 AP - 00282541 5/13/2009 BRODARI' BOOKS 4.30 AP - 00282541 5/13/2009 BRODART BOOKS S 1.66 AP - 00282541 5/13/2009 BRODART BOOKS 3882 AP - 00282541 5/13/2009 BRODART BOOKS 12.90 AP - 00282541 5/13/2009 BRODART BOOKS 4.30 AP - 00282541 5/13/2009 BRODART BOOKS 4.30 AP - 00282541 5/13/2009 BRODART BOOKS 8.60 AP - 00282541 5/13!2009 BRODART BOOKS 4.30 AP - 00282541 5/13/2009 BRODART BOOKS 25.92 AP - 00282541 5/13/2009 BRODART BOOKS 17.26 AP - 00282541 5/13/2009 BRODART BOOKS 21.48 AP - 00282541 5/13/2009 BRODART BOOKS 25.92 AP - 00282541 5/13/2009 BRODART BOOKS 97.14 AP - 00282541 5/13/2009 BRODART BOOKS 56.14 AP - 00282541 5/] 3/2009 BRODART BOOKS 39.12 AP - 00282541 5/13/2009 BRODART BOOKS 12.16 AP - 00282541 5/13/2009 BRODART BOOKS 197.48 AP - 00282541 5/13/2009 BRODART BOOKS 14.67 AP - 00282541 5/13/2009 BRODART BOOKS 442.14 AP - 00282541 5/13/2009 BRODART BOOKS 188.87 AP - 00282541 5/13/2009 BRODART BOOKS 170.34 AP - 00282541 5/13/2009 BRODART BOOKS 12.18 AP - 00282541 5/13/2009 BRODART BOOKS 14.67 AP - 00282541 5/13/2009 BRODART BOOKS 39.95 AP - 00282541 5/13/2009 BRODART BOOKS 30.00 AP - 00282541 5/13/2009 BRODART BOOKS 29.46 AP - 00282541 5/13/2009 BRODART BOOKS 74.15 AP - 00282541 5/13/2009 BRODART BOOKS 44.93 AP - 00282541 5/13/2009 BRODART BOOKS 10.90 AP - 00282541 5/13/2009 BRODART BOOKS 237.84 AP - 00282541 5/13/2009 BRODART BOOKS 36.59 AP - 00282541 5/13/2009 BRODART BOOKS 431.01 AP - 00282541 5/13/2009 BRODART BOOKS 91.72 AP - 00282541 5/t 3/2009 BRODART BOOKS 205.68 P37 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 4 Current Date: 05/27/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Pomait Layout Time: 1126:2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P38 Agenda Check Register 5/13/2009 through 5/26/2009 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00282541 5/13/2009 BRODART BOOKS 285.98 AP - 00282541 5/13/2009 BRODART BOOKS 99.93 AP - 00282541 5/13/2009 BRODART BOOKS 9.60 AP - 00282541 5/13/2009 BRODART BOOKS 70.41 AP - 00282541 5/13/2009 BRODART BOOKS 73.32 AP - 00282541 5/13/2009 BRODART BOOKS 18.58 AP - 00282541 5/13/2009 BRODART BOOKS 129.42 AP - 00282541 5/13/2009 BRODART BOOKS 42.90 AP - 00282541 5/13/2009 BRODART BOOKS 516.53 AP - 00282541 5/13/2009 BRODART BOOKS 14.13 AP - 00282541 5/13/2009 BRODART BOOKS 26.38 AP - 00282541 5/13/2009 BRODART BOOKS 14.69 AP - 00282541 5/13/2009 BRODART BOOKS 2827 AP - 00282541 5/13/2009 BRODART BOOKS 41.38 AP - 00282541 5/13/2009 BRODART BOOKS 53.58 AP - 00282541 5/13/2009 BRODART BOOKS 26.59 AP - 00282541 5/13/2009 BRODART BOOKS 74.10 AP - 00282541 5/13/2009 BRODART BOOKS 14.99 AP - 00282541 5/13/2009 BRODART BOOKS 63.55 AP - 00282541 5/13/2009 BRODART BOOKS 9.81 AP - 00282541 5/13/2009 BRODAR'C BOOKS 17824 AP - 00282541 5/13/2009 BRODART BOOKS 127.74 AP - 00282541 5/13/2009 BRODART BOOKS 42.95 AP - 00282541 5/13/2009 BRODART BOOKS 4.30 AP - 00282541 5/13/2009 BRODART BOOKS 4.30 AP - 00282541 5/13/2009 BRODART BOOKS 4.30 AP - 00282541 5/13/2009 BRODART BOOKS 4.30 AP - 00282541 5/13/2009 BRODART BOOKS 4.30 AP - 0028254] 5/13/2009 BRODART BOOKS 51.84 AP - 00282541 5/13/2009 BRODART BOOKS 4.30 AP - 00282541 5/13/2009 BRODART BOOKS 41.00 AP - 00282541 5/13/2009 BRODART BOOKS 6.48 AP - 00282541 5/13/2009 BRODART BOOKS 34.46 AP - 00282541 5/13/2009 BRODART BOOKS 19.44 AP - 00282541 5/13/2009 BRODART BOOKS 8.60 AP - 00282541 5/13/2009 BRODART BOOKS 17.20 AP - 00282541 5/13/2009 BRODART BOOKS 4.30 AP - 00282541 5/13/2009 BRODART BOOKS 4.30 AP - 00282541 5/13/2009 BRODART BOOKS 8.60 AP - 00282541 5/13/2009 BRODART BOOKS 6.48 AP - 00282541 5/13/2009 BRODART BOOKS 266.36 AP - 00282541 5/13/2009 BRODART BOOKS 32.28 AP - 00282541 5/13/2009 BRODART BOOKS 17.26 AP - 00282541 5/13/2009 BRODART BOOKS 4.30 AP - 00282541 5/13/2009 BRODART BOORS 23.74 AP - 00282541 5/13/2009 BRODART BOOKS 10.78 AP - 00282541 5/13/2009 BRODAKT BOOKS 17.20 AP - 00282541 5/13/2009 BRODART BOOKS 4.30 AP - 00282541 5/13/2009 BRODART BOOKS 4.30 AP - 00282541 5/13/2009 BRODART BOOKS 23.68 AP - 00282541 5/13/2009 BRODART BOOKS 8.60 AP - 0028254] 5/13/2009 BRODART BOOKS 4.30 AP - 00282541 5/13/2009 BRODART BOOKS 12.90 AP - 00282541 5/13/2009 BRODART BOOKS 19.44 _ User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 5 Current Date: 05/27/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_R EG_PORTRAI T_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Pomait Layout Time: 11:26:2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P39 A¢enda Check Reeister 5/13/2009 through 5/26/2009 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 0028254] 5/13/2009 BRODART BOOKS 21.48 AP - 00282542 5/132009 CAL-STATE RENT A FENCE INC 66.75 AP - 00282543 5/13/2009 CALIFORNIA BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, STAT 6,135.00 AP - 00282544 5/13/2009 CALIFORNIA JAMMIN' 300.00 AP - 00282545 5/13/2009 CALSENSE 331.87 AP - 00282546 5/13/2009 CAMPOS DECORATION & RENTALS 740.00 AP - 00282547 5/13/2009 CARDENAS, SERGIO 25.00 AP - 00282548 5/13/2009 CARSON, AMY 169.34 AP - 00282549 5/13/2009 CERTIFION CORPORATION DBA/ENTERSECT 53.70 AP - 00282550 5/13/2009 CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS 109.99 AP - 00282551 5/13/2009 CICONE, ANGELIQUE 50.00 AP - 00282552 5/13/2009 CISNEROS, HERNANDO 880.00 AP - 00282553 5/13/2009 CLEARWATER GRAPHICS 5,992.13 AP - 00282554 5/13/2009 COPIES & INK PRINTING INC. 59.29 AP - 00282554 5/13/2009 COPIES & INK PRINTING INC. 1,219.03 AP - 00282555 5/13/2009 COPP CRUSHING CORD, DAN 20.00 AP - 00282557 5/13/2009 COVENANT STAFFING INC. 97.79 AP - 00282557 5/13/2009 COVENANT STAFFING INC. 711.20 AP - 00282557 5/13/2009 COVENANT STAFFING INC. 177.80 AP - 00282557 5/13/2009 COVENANT STAFFING INC. 711.20 AP - 00282557 5/13/2009 COVENANT STAFFING INC. 266.70 AP - 00282558 5/13/2009 CREATIVE MANAGEMENT SOLUTIONS INC 585.00 AP - 00282559 5/13/2009 CRESTWOOD CORPORATION 1,000.00 AP - 00282559 5/13/2009 CRESTR'OOD CORPORATION 1,000.00 AP - 00282560 5/13/2009 CRIDLAND, KYLE 36.30 AP - 00282561 5/13/2009 CRIME SCENE STERI-CLEAR' LLC 540.00 AP - 00282562 5/13/2009 CRRA 200.00 AP - 00282566 5/13/2009 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 607.86 AP - 00282566 5/13/2009 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,014.89 AP - 00282566 5/] 3/2009 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 566.82 AP - 00282566 5/13/2009 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 729.47 AP - 00282566 5/13/2009 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,036.31 AP - 00282566 5/13/2009 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 613.56 AP - 00282566 5/13/2009 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 771.24 AP - 00282566 5/13/2009 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 129.26 AP - 00282566 5/13/2009 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 40.60 AP - 00282566 5/13/2009 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 50.09 AP - 00282566 5/13/2009 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 135.12 AP - 00282566 5/13/2009 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 157.61 AP - 00282566 5/13/2009 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 62.85 AP - 00282566 5/13/2009 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 121.18 AP - 00282566 5/13/2009 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 68.87 AP - 00282566 5/13/2009 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 116.72 AP - 00282566 5/t 3/2009 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 38.81 AP - 00282566 5/13/2009 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 48.98 AP - 00282566 5/13/2009 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 380.39 AP - 00282566 5/13/2009 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 516.06 AP - 00282566 5/13/2009 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 618.99 AP - 00282566 5/13/2009 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,326.95 AP - 00282566 5/13/2009 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,91055 AP - 00282566 5/13/2009 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 45.86 AP - 00282566 5/13/2009 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 253.80 AP - 00282566 5/13/2009 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 135.05 AP - 00282566 5/13/2009 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 407.49 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 6 Current Date: 05/27/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_ REG_PORTRAI T_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Timc: 11:26:2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA A>?enda Check Register 5/13/2009 through 5/26/2009 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name AP - 00282566 5/13/2009 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP - 00282566 5/13/2009 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP - 00282566 5/13/2009 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP - 00282566 5/13/2009 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP - 00282566 5/13/2009 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP - 00282566 5/13/2009 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP - 00282566 5/13/2009 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP - 00282566 5/13/2009 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP - 00282566 5/13/2009 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP - 00282566 5!13/2009 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP - 00282566 5/13/2009 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP - 00282566 5/13/2009 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP - 00282566 5/13/2009 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP - 00282566 5/13/2009 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP - 00282566 5/13/2009 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP - 00282566 5/13/2009 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP - 00282566 5/13/2009 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP - 00282566 5/13/2009 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP - 00282566 5/13/2009 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP - 00282566 5/13/2009 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP - 00282566 5/13/2009 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP - 00282566 5/13/2009 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP - 00282566 5/13/2009 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP - 00282566 5/13/2009 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP - 00282566 5/13/2009 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP - 00282566 5/13/2009 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP - 00282566 5/13/2009 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP - 00282566 5/13/2009 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP - 00282566 5/13/2009 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP - 00282566 5/13/2009 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP - 00282566 5/13/2009 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP - 00282566 5/13/2009 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP - 00282566 5/13/2009 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP - 00282566 5/13/2009 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP - 00282566 5/13/2009 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP - 00282566 5/13/2009 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP - 00282566 5/]3/2009 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP - 00282566 5/13/2009 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP - 00282566 5/13/2009 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP - 00282566 5/13/2009 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP - 00282566 5/13/2009 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP - 00282566 5/13/2009 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP - 00282566 5/13/2009 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP - 00282566 5/13/2009 CUCAMONGA VALLEY RATER DISTRICT AP - 00282566 5/13/2009 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP - 00282566 5/13/2009 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP - 00282566 5/13/2009 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP - 00282566 5/13/2009 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP - 00282566 5/13/2009 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP - 00282566 5/13/2009 CUCAMONGA V ALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP - 00282566 5/13/2009 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP - 00282566 5/13/2009 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP - 00282566 5/13/2009 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP - 00282566 5/13'2009 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 7 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Pomait Layout P40 Amoun[ 476.59 61.86 85.34 76.88 565.41 32.06 127.64 384.62 173.12 513.24 805.11 809.34 344.04 156.58 1,755.45 1,190.04 899.58 164.66 36.80 215.73 282.74 850.23 781.14 1,730.07 507.60 1,469.22 26.42 1,949.72 23.60 679.31 129.41 243.58 73.1 ] 46.16 94.25 193.53 2,934.53 180.48 72.65 73.01 170.61 84.29 121.26 167.79 621.81 91.05 109.98 851.64 111.08 26.42 106.85 192.86 167.86 144.92 Current Date: 05/27/200 Time: 1 ] :26:2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P41 A>:enda Check Register 5/13/2009 through 5/26!2009 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00282566 8/13/2009 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 34.63 AP - 00282566 8/13/2009 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 81.61 AP - 00282566 8/13/2009 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 3,631.49 AP - 00282566 8/13/2009 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,241.34 AP - 00282566 8/13/2009 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 547.08 AP - 00282566 8/13/2009 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 418.46 AP - 00282566 8/13/2009 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,151.97 AP - 00282566 8/13/2009 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 847.88 AP - 00282566 8/13/2009 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 171.80 AP - 00282566 8/13/2009 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,108.88 AP - 00282566 8/13/2009 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 450.89 AP - 00282566 8/13/2009 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 787.88 AP - 00282566 8/13/2009 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 829.91 AP - 00282566 8/13/2009 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 736.19 AP - 00282566 8/13/2009 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 82.70 AP - 00282566 8/13/2009 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 668.32 AP - 00282566 5/] 3/2009 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 496.01 AP - 00282566 8/13/2009 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 701.87 AP - 00282566 8/13/2009 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,614.64 AP - 00282566 8/13/2009 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT S 10.07 AP - 00282566 8/13/2009 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 95.86 AP - 00282566 8/13/2009 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 155.14 AP - 00282566 8/13/2009 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 650.69 AP - 00282566 8/13/2009 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 201.69 AP - 00282566 8/13/2009 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 2,148.84 AP - 00282566 8/13/2009 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 34.63 AP - 00282566 8/13/2009 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 172.63 AP - 00282566 8/13/2009 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 638.73 AP - 00282566 8/13/2009 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 622.91 AP - 00282566 8/13/2009 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 269.63 AP - 00282567 8/13/2009 CUTTING EDGE VIDEO CONCEPTS 700.00 AP - 00282568 8/13/2009 DAISY WHEEL RIBBON CO INC 151.49 AP - 00282568 8/13/2009 DAISY WHEEL RIBBON CO INC 2,347.45 AP - 00282569 8/13/2009 DAPPER TIRE CO 259.35 AP - 00282570 8/13/2009 DAVIS, AZIZA 42.35 AP - 00282570 8/13/2009 DAMS, AZIZA ]4.85 AP - 00282571 8/13/2009 DEER CREEK CAR CARE CENTER 19.69 AP - 00282571 8/13/2009 DEER CREEK CAR CARE CENTER 19.69 AP - 00282572 8/13/2009 DELTA MICROIMAGING INC ]59.86 AP - 00282873 8/13/2009 DEMMERS, LINDA 650.00 AP - 00282574 8/13/2009 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 2,410.81 AP - 00282575 8/13/2009 ELLISON-SCHNEIDER B HARRIS L.L.P. 2,202.00 AP - 00282576 5/13/2009 EMPIRE ECONOMICS INC 635.00 AP - 00282577 5/13/2009 EMPIRE MOBILE HOME SERVICE 1,689.60 AP - 00282577 8/13/2009 EMPIRE MOBILE HOME SERVICE 490.00 AP - 00282878 8/13/2009 EMPIRE MOBILE HOME SERVICE 175.00 AP - 00282578 8/13/2009 EMPIRE MOBILE HOME SERVICE 250.00 AP - 00282579 5/13/2009 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 588.12 AP - 00282579 8/13/2009 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 581.38 AP - 00282580 8/13/2009 FASTENAL COMPANY 42.06 AP - 0028258 i 8/13/2009 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORD 64.53 AP - 00282581 8/13/2009 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 99.40 AP - 00282582 5/13/2009 FENCE CRAFT OF UPLAND INC 1,265.41 AP - 00282583 8/13/2009 FORD OF UPLAND INC 47.48 __ User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 8 Current Date: 05/27/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_ REG_PORTRAT T_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layoui Time: 11:26:2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Resister s/13/2009 through 5/26/2009 Check No. Check Dale Vendor Name AP - 00282s83 Si 13/2009 FORD OF UPLAND INC AP - 00282583 5/13/2009 FORD OF UPLAND INC AP - 00282583 5/13.2009 FORD OF UPLAND INC AP - 00282584 5/13/2009 FOREMOST SILKSCREEN AND EMBROIDERY AP - 0028258s 5/13/2009 FRAZEE PAINT CENTER AP - 00282585 5/t 3/2009 FRAZEE PAINT CENTER AP - 00282586 5/13/2009 FUKUSHIMA, JUDITH AP - 00282587 s/13/2009 FUND RAISERS LTD AP - 00282588 5/13/2009 GALE GROUP,THE AP - 00282588 5/13/2009 GALE GROUP,THE AP - 00282588 5/13/2009 GALE GROUP,THE AP - 00282588 5/13/2009 GALE GROUP,THE AP - 00282588 5/13/2009 GALE GROUP,THE AP - 00282588 5/13/2009 GALE GROUP,THE AP - 00282588 5/13/2009 GALE GROUP,THE AP - 00282588 s/13/2009 GALE GROUP,THE AP - 00282588 5/13/2009 GALE GROUP,THE AP - 00282588 s/13/2009 GALE GROUP,THE AP - 00282s89 5/13/2009 GARDNER, CAROL AP - 00282590 s/13/2009 GARY LINDSEY ARTIST SERVICES AP - 00282591 5/13/2009 GENTRY, DONALD A AP - 00282592 5/13/2009 GEOGRAPHICS AP - 00282592 5/13/2009 GEOGRAPHICS AP - 00282592 5/13/2009 GEOGRAPHICS AP - 00282592 5/13/2009 GEOGRAPHICS AP - 00282592 5/13/2009 GEOGRAPHICS AP - 00282592 5/13/2009 GEOGRAPHICS AP - 00282593 5/13/2009 GIL, ALEX AP - 00282s94 5/13/2009 GOLDSTAR ASPHALT PRODUCTS AP - 0028259s 5/13/2009 GRAINGER AP - 00282595 5/13/2009 GRAINGER AP - 00282595 5/13/2009 GRAINGER AP - 00282s95 5/13/2009 GRAINGER AP - 00282595 s/13/2009 GRAINGER AP - 00282596 5/13/2009 GRANT III, VINCENT AP - 00282597 5/13/2009 GRAPHICS FACTORY PRINTING INC. AP - 00282597 5/13/2009 GRAPHICS FACTORY PRINTING INC. AP - 00282597 s/13/2009 GRAPHICS FACTORY PRINTING INC. AP - 00282598 5/13/2009 GYROSCOPE INC AP - 00282598 5/13/2009 GYROSCOPE [NC AP - 00282599 5/13/2009 HALL & FOREMAN I:~'C AP - 00282599 5/13/2009 HALL R FOREMAN INC AP - 00282600 5/13/2009 HARALAMBOS BEVERAGE COMPANY AP - 00282602 5/13/2009 HILLS PET NUTRITION SALES INC AP - 00282602 s/13/2009 HILLS PET NUTRITION SALES INC AP - 00282602 5/13/2009 HILLS PET NUTRITION SALES INC AP - 00282603 5/13/2009 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC AP - 00282603 5/13/2009 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC AP - 00282603 5/13/2009 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC AP - 00282604 5/13/2009 HOUSE OF RUTH AP - 00282605 5/13/2009 HUGHES, RANCE AP - 00282606 5/] 3/2009 HUMANE SOCIETY OF SAN BERNARDINO VAL] AP - 00282607 5/13/2009 HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS INC AP - 00282607 5/13!2009 HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS INC User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 9 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAI T_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Pomait Layoui P42 Amount 90.00 -47.48 46.41 189.23 12.38 327.60 3,250.50 181.s7 -206.77 10.36 30.41 92.97 92.97 60.82 150.31 28.66 205.03 62.56 2.00 2,200.00 1,251.25 2,179.35 1,065.75 3,307.93 200.00 6,931.56 140.00 I s.00 424.13 38.88 17.78 470.96 338.62 6.1s 234.00 144.96 433.69 823.55 18,908.00 1,608.28 408.00 1,179.00 294.60 30.45 397.38 397.38 183.78 451.97 50.00 7szs5 41.80 251.00 126.45 111.80 Current Dale: Timc: 05/27/200 11:26:2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P43 Aeenda Check Resister 5/]3/2009 through 5/26/2009 Check No. Check Dale Vendor Name Amount AP - 00282608 S/ li/2009 I A A P 98.00 AP - 00282609 5/13/2009 INLAND EMPIRE MAGAZINE 1,495.00 AP - 00282610 5/13/2009 INLAND EMPIRE TOURS AND TRANSPORTATIC 10,078.00 AP - 00282612 5/13/2009 INLAND FAIR HOUSING AND MEDIATION BOAT 810.74 AP - 00282612 5/13/2009 INLAND FAIR HOUSING AND MEDIATION BOAT 27.50 AP - 00282612 5/13/2009 INLAND FAIR HOUSING AND MEDIATION BOA] 920.54 AP - 00282613 5/13/2009 INLAND PRESORT & MAILING SERVICES 154.10 AP - 00282616 5/13/2009 INTERWEST CONSULTING GROUP INC 2,565.00 AP - 00282617 S/13/2009 INTOXIMETERS INC 49850 ' AP - 00282619 5/13/2009 JAN WAY COMPANY INC 227.23 AP - 00282619 S/13/2009 JAN WAY COMPANY INC 346.20 AP - 00282620 5/13/2009 JESSE BILLAUER ENTERPEISES INC 500.00 AP - 00282621 5/13/2009 JRC HOUSING INC 6,595.00 AP - 00282622 5/13/2009 JRC HOUSING INC 7,140.00 AP - 00282623 5/13/2009 KARATSU, ROBERT 70.00 AP - 00282624 5/13/2009 KOA CORPORATION 3,000.00 AP - 00282625 5/13/2009 KOLARIK, RAYNOR D. 100.00 AP - 00282626 5/13/2009 LA PUMA, DEBORAH WICKS 200.00 AP - 00282627 5/13/2009 LAIRD CONSTRUCTION CO 28,149.76 AP - 00282628 5/13/2009 LAKESHORE LEARNING MATERIALS 2,370.65 AP - 00282629 5/13/2009 LIEBER'I' CASSIDY WHITMORE 1,364.65 AP - 00282631 5/13/2009 LIMS AUTO INC 196.59 AP - 00282631 5/13/2009 LIMS AUTO INC 107.02 AP - 00282631 S/13/2009 LIMS AUTO INC 494.86 AP - 00282632 5/13/2009 LITTLE BEAR PRODUCTIONS 150.00 AP - 00282632 5/13/2009 LITTLE BEAR PRODUCTIONS 285.00 AP - 00282632 5/13/2009 LITTLE BEAR PRODUCTIONS 375.00 AP - 00282632 5/13/2009 LITTLE BEAR PRODUCTIONS 725.00 AP - 00282632 5/13/2009 LITTLE BEAR PRODUCTIONS 4,385.00 AP - 00282632 5/13/2009 LITTLE BEAR PRODUCTIONS 50.00 AP - 00282632 5/13/2009 LITTLE BEAR PRODUCTIONS 375.00 AP - 00282632 5/13/2009 LITTLE BEAR PRODUCTIONS 300.00 AP - 00282632 5/13/2009 LITTLE BEAR PRODUCTIONS 150.00 AP - 00282633 5/13/2009 LOS ANGELES TIMES 46.40 AP - 00282636 5/13/2009 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 4.29 AP - 00282636 5/13/2009 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 5.64 AP - 00282636 5/13/2009 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 35.36 AP - 00282636 5/13/2009 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 35.34 AP - 00282636 5/13/2009 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 25.67 AP - 00282636 5/13/2009 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 49.58 AP - 00282636 5/13/2009 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 11.82 AP - 00282636 5/13/2009 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 41.93 AP - 00282636 5/13/2009 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 215.04 AP - 00282636 5/]3/2009 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 184.69 AP - 00282636 5/13/2009 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 88.74 AP - 00282636 5/13/2009 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 8.59 AP - 00282636 5/13/2009 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 207.10 AP - 00282636 5/13/2009 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 35.49 AP - 00282636 5/13/2009 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 178.39 AP - 00282636 5/13/2009 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 53.58 AP - 00282636 5/13/2009 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 6.75 AP - 00282636 5/13/2009 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 183.03 AP - 00282636 5/13/2009 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 22.38 AP - 00282636 5/13/2009 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 339.63 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 10 Current Date: 05/27/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_R EG_PORTRAI T_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Pomait Layout Time: 11:26:2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P44 Aeenda Check Resister 5/13/2009 through 5/26/2009 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00282636 5/13/2009 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 247.00 AP - 00282636 5/13/2009 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 13.81 AP - 00282636 5/13/2009 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 12.82 AP - 00282636 5/13/2009 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 114.68 AP - 00282636 5/13/2009 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 43.47 AP - 00282636 5/13/2009 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 14.91 AP - 00282636 5/13/2009 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 32.60 AP - 00282636 5/13/2009 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 14.20 AP - 00282636 5/13/2009 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 555.60 AP - 00282636 5/13/2009 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 94.53 AP - 00282636 5/13/2009 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 34.19 AP - 00282636 5/13/2009 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 28.47 AP - 00282636 5/13/2009 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 92.22 AP - 00282636 5/13/2009 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 35.79 AP - 00282636 5/13/2009 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 2].26 AP - 00282636 5/13/2009 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 21.73 AP - 00282636 5/13/2009 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 350.18 AP - 00282636 5/13/2009 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 123.89 AP - 00282636 5/13/2009 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 13.83 AP - 00282636 5/13/2009 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 47.63 AP - 00282636 5/13/2009 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 15.94 AP - 00282636 5/13/2009 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 8.30 AP - 00282636 5/13/2009 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 16.35 AP - 00282636 5/13/2009 LOWES COMPANIES II~'C. 45.46 AP - 00282636 5/13/2009 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 242.03 AP - 00282636 5/13/2009 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 57.14 AP - 00282636 5/13/2009 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 13.25 AP - 00282636 5/13/2009 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 462.93 AP - 00282636 5/13/2009 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 38.76 AP - 00282636 5/13/2009 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 141.59 AP - 00282636 5/13/2009 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 18.97 AP - 00282636 5/13/2009 LOWES COMPANIES II~'C. 41.19 AP - 00282636 5/13/2009 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 156.92 AP-00282636 5/13/2009 LOWESCOMPANIESINC. 49.98 AP - 00282636 5/13/2009 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 342.37 AP - 00282636 5/13/2009 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 46.95 AP - 00282636 5/13/2009 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 40.40 AP - 00282636 5/13/2009 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 32.67 AP - 00282636 5/13/2009 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 193.62 AP - 00282636 5/13/2009 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 182.83 AP - 00282636 5/13/2009 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 101.14 AP - 00282636 5/13/2009 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 9.09 AP - 00282636 5/13/2009 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 32.86 AP - 00282636 5/13/2009 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 30.72 AP - 00282636 5/13/2009 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 7.29 AP - 00282636 5/13/2009 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 85.55 AP - 00282636 5/13/2009 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 38.00 AP - 00282636 5/13/2009 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 50.48 AP - 00282636 5/13/2009 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 53.64 AP - 00282636 5/13/2009 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 15.51 AP - 00282636 5/13/2009 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 9.96 AP - 00282636 5/13/2009 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 62.21 AP - 00282636 5/13/2009 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 45.03 AP - 00282636 5/13/2009 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 45.01 Qser: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 11 Current Date: 05/27/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRATT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Pomait Layout Time: 11:26:2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P45 Agenda Check Resister 5/13/2009 t}uough 5/26/2009 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00282637 5/13/2009 MAIN' STREET SIGNS 300.00 AP - 00282637 5/13/2009 MAIN STREET SIGNS ] 7.55 AP - 00282638 5/13/2009 MANNING ELECTRIC 2,]23.90 AP - 00282638 5/13/2009 MANNING ELECTRIC 948.50 AP - 00282638 5/13/2009 MANNING ELECTRIC 1,000.00 AP - 00282639 5/13/2009 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 1,564.44 AP - 00282640 5/13/2009 MARTINEZ UNION SERVICE 150.00 AP - 00282640 5/13/2009 MARTINEZ UNION SERVICE 150.00 AP - 00282641 5/13/2009 MATHIS CONSULTING GROUP 750.00 AP - 00282642 5/13/2009 MIDWEST TAPE 34.99 AP - 00282642 5/13/2009 MIDWEST TAPE 26.38 AP - 00282642 5/13/2009 MIDWEST TAPE 37.98 AP - 00282642 5/13/2009 MIDWEST TAPE 149.93 AP - 00282642 5/13/2009 MIDWEST TAPE 73.97 AP - 00282642 5/13/2009 MIDWEST TAPE 14.39 AP - 00282642 5/13/2009 MIDWEST TAPE 67.56 AP - 00282642 5/13/2009 MIDWEST TAPE 274.88 AP - 00282642 5/13/2009 MIDWEST TAPE 67.56 AP - 00282642 5/13/2009 MIDWEST TAPE 184.52 AP - 00282643 5/13/2009 MITSUBISHI ELECTRIC & ELECTRONICS USA Ii 515.07 AP - 00282644 5/13/2009 MOSAIC 27 370.79 AP - 00282645 5/13/2009 MUNOZ, CONNIE 16.00 AP - 00282646 5/13/2009 MWI VETERINARY SUPPLY 2,744.68 AP - 00282646 5/13/2009 MWI VETERINARY SUPPLY 29.08 AP - 00282646 5/13/2009 MWI VETERINARY SUPPLY 1,249.13 AP - 00282646 5/13/2009 MWI VETERINARY SUPPLY -193.30 AP - 00282646 5/13/2009 MWI VETERJNARY SUPPLY 3.84 AP - 00282646 5/13/2009 MWI VETERINARY SUPPLY 17.19 AP - 00282646 5/13/2009 MWI VETERINARY SUPPLY 7.91 AP - 00282646 5/13/2009 MWI VETERINARY SUPPLY 1,439.70 AP - 00282646 5/13/2009 MWI VETERINARY SUPPLY 76.78 AP - 00282647 5/13/2009 NATIONAL MS SOCIETY SOUTHERN CALIFORI` 2,000.00 AP - 00282649 5/13/2009 NEC UNIFIED SOLUTIONS INC 1,475.00 AP - 00282650 5/13/2009 NEXTG NETWORKS INC 5,000.00 AP - 00282650 5/13/2009 NEXTG NETWORKS INC 10,000.00 AP - 00282650 5/13/2009 NEXTG NETWORKS INC 10,000.00 AP - 00282650 5/13/2009 NEXTG NETWORKS INC 10,000.00 AP - 00282651 5/13/2009 NICHOLS, JANINE 160.00 AP - 00282652 5/13/2009 NINYO & MOORE 4,068.50 AP - 00282652 5/13/2009 NINYO & MOORE 1,355.25 AP - 00282652 5/13/2009 NINYO R MOORE 2,882.25 AP - 00282653 5/13/2009 OBS AUDIO 200.00 AP - 00282654 5/13/2009 OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH CEN"CERS OF CALIFC 114.00 AP - 00282654 5/13/2009 OCCUPA"TIONAL HEALTH CENTERS OF CALIFC 68.62 AP - 00282654 5/13/2009 OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH CENTERS OF CALIFO 156.77 AP - 00282654 5/13/2009 OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH CENTERS OF CALIFC 68.62 AP - 00282654 5/13/2009 OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH CENTERS OF CALIFO 172.00 AP - 00282656 5/13/2009 OFFICE DEPOT 28.23 AP - 00282656 5/13/2009 OFFICE DEPOT 17.60 AP - 00282Ct56 5/13/2009 OFFICE DEPOT 19.34 AP - 00282656 5/13/2009 OFFICE DEPOT 32.61 AP - 00282656 5/] 3/2009 OFFICE DEPOT 10.92 AP - 00282656 5/13/2009 OFFICE DEPOT 16.03 AP - 00282656 5/13/2009 OFFICE DEPOT 43.34 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 12 Current Date: OS/27/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_ REG_PORTRAI T_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Pomait Layout Timc: 11:262 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 5/13/2009 through 5/26/2009 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name AP - 00282656 5/13/2009 OFFICE DEPOT AP - 00282656 5/13/2009 OFFICE DEPOT AP - 00282656 5/13/2009 OFFICE DEPOT AP - 00282656 5/13/2009 OFFICE DEPOT AP - 00282656 5/13/2009 OFFICE DEPOT AP - 00282656 5/13/2009 OFFICE DEPOT AP - 00282656 5/13/2009 OFFICE DEPOT AP - 00282656 5/13/2009 OFFICE DEPOT AP - 00282656 5/13/2009 OFFICE DEPOT AP - 00282656 5/13/2009 OFFICE DEPOT AP - 00282656 5/13/2009 OFFICE DEPOT AP - 00282656 5/13/2009 OFFICE DEPOT AP - 00282656 5/13/2009 OFFICE DEPOT AP - 00282656 5/13/2009 OFFICE DEPOT AP - 00282656 5/13/2009 OFFICE DEPOT AP - 00282656 5/13/2009 OFFICE DEPOT AP - 00282656 5/13/2009 OFFICE DEPOT AP - 00282656 5/13/2009 OFFICE DEPOT AP - 00282656 5/13/2009 OFFICE DEPOT AP - 00282656 5/13/2009 OFFICE DEPOT AP - 00282656 5/13/2009 OFFICE DEPOT AP - 00282656 5/13/2009 OFFICE DEPOT AP - 00282656 5/13/2009 OFFICE DEPOT AP - 00282656 5/13/2009 OFFICE DEPOT AP - 00282656 5/13/2009 OFFICE DEPOT AP - 00282656 5/13/2009 OFFICE DEPOT AP - 00282656 5/13/2009 OFFICE DEPOT AP - 00282656 5/13/2009 OFFICE DEPOT AP - 00282656 5/13!2009 OFFICE DEPOT AP - 00282656 5/13/2009 OFFICE DEPOT AP - 00282656 5/13/2009 OFFICE DEPOT AP - 00282656 5/13/2009 OFFICE DEPOT AP - 00282656 5/13/2009 OFFICE DEPOT AP - 00282656 5/13/2009 OFFICE DEPOT AP - 00282656 5/13/2009 OFFICE DEPOT AP - 00282656 5/13/2009 OFFICE DEPOT AP - 00282656 5/13/2009 OFFICE DEPOT AP - 00282656 5/13/2009 OFFICE DEPOT AP - 00282656 5/13/2009 OFFICE DEPOT AP - 00282656 5/13/2009 OFFICE DEPOT AP - 00282656 5/13/2009 OFFICE DEPOT AP - 00282656 5/13/2009 OFFICE DEPOT AP - 00282657 >/13/2009 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE AP - 00282657 5/13/2009 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE AP - 00282657 5/13/2009 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE AP - 00282657 5/13/2009 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE AP - 00282657 5/13/2009 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE AP - 00282657 5/li/2009 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE AP - 00282657 5/13/2009 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE AP - 00282657 5/13/2009 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE AP - 00282657 5/]3/2009 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE AP - 00282657 5/13/2009 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE AP - 00282657 5/13/2009 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE AP - 00282657 5/13/2009 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 13 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Pomait Layout P46 Amount 28.17 -58.16 -45.69 46.98 250.54 20.61 110.86 117.27 28.18 126.50 14.99 14.29 453.40 31.24 25.67 5.02 104.87 493.56 55.26 274.81 603.71 31.20 48.85 62.82 20.92 8.04 10.74 58.33 60.26 40.41 48.93 46.72 470.69 25.71 280.16 87.30 36.59 6.57 8.40 380.42 112.86 4.35 17.64 21.71 6.83 29.44 -7.17 7.17 1>.21 172.40 134.18 31.24 8.69 28.11 Current Date: 05/27/200 Time: 11:26:2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P47 Agenda Check Register 5/13/2009 through 5/26/2009 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amoun[ AP - 00282657 5/13/2009 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 5.97 AP - 00282657 5/13/2009 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 5.35 AP - 00282657 5/13/2009 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 1.28 AP - 00282657 5/13/2009 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 8.68 AP - 00282657 5!13/2009 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 71.08 AP - 00282657 5/13/2009 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 38.04 AP - 00282657 5/13/2009 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 6.07 AP - 00282657 5/13/2009 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 81.53 AP - 00282657 5/13/2009 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 56.15 AP - 00282657 5/13/2009 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 4.47 AP - 00282657 5/13/2009 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 24.11 AP - 00282657 5/13/2009 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 13.01 AP - 00282657 5/13/2009 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 59.77 AP - 00282657 5/13/2009 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 39.12 AP - 00282657 5/13/2009 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 343.94 AP - 00282657 5/13/2009 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 525.41 AP - 00282657 5/13/2009 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE -18.65 AP - 00282658 5/13/2009 ORONA, PATRICIA 675.00 AP - 00282658 5/13/2009 ORONA, PATRICIA 450.00 AP - 00282659 5/13/2009 PARR, DANIEL 250.00 AY - 00282660 5/13/2009 PARK, HAE J 1,000.00 AP - 00282661 5/13/2009 PATRIOT HIGH SCHOOL 1,500.00 AP - 00282662 5/13/2009 PATTERSON BUILDERS 15,000.00 AP - 00282665 5/13/2009 PELLETIER AND ASSOCIATES INC 275.00 AP - 00282666 5/13/2009 PEP BOYS 103.26 AP -00282667 5/13/2009 PETROVICH, VICTORIA 30.94 AP - 00282668 5/13/2009 PMI 1,567.70 AP - 00282669 5/13/2009 POMA DISTRIBUTING CO 2,393.59 AP - 00282670 5/13/2009 PORTER, KATHY 1,340.66 AP - 00282671 5/13/2009 POUK AND STEINLE INC. 3,197.97 AP - 00282671 S/13/2009 POUK AND STEINLE INC. 1,285.18 AP - 00282671 5/13/2009 POUK AND STEINLE INC. 3,740.00 AP - 00282672 5/13/2009 PRO-PLANET INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY 678.41 AP - 00282673 5/13/2009 PULCINELLA, JOSEPH 23.10 AP - 00282674 5/13/2009 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 304.61 AP - 00282674 5/13/2009 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 40.75 AP - 00282674 5/13/2009 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 34.02 AP - 00282674 S/13/2009 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 40.00 AP - 00282674 5/13/2009 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 235.13 AP - 00282674 5/13/2009 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 65.75 AP - 00282674 5/13/2009 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 194.37 AP - 00282674 5/13/2009 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 616.58 AP - 00282674 S/13/2009 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 65.75 AP - 00282674 5/13/2009 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 65.75 AP - 00282674 5/13/2009 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 65.75 AP - 00282674 5/13/2009 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 557.65 AP - 00282674 5/13/2009 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 596.68 AP - 00282674 5/13/2009 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 44.47 AP - 00282674 5/13/2009 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 80.75 AP - 00282674 5/13/2009 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 519.82 AP - 00282674 5/] 3/2009 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 194.37 AP - 00282674 5/13/2009 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 454.45 AP - 00282674 5/13/2009 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 246.98 AP - 00282674 5/]3/2009 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 65.32 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 14 Current Dale: 05/27/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_ REG_PORTRAI T_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Pomait Layout Time: 11:26:2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 5/13/2009 through 5/26/2009 Check No. Check Dale Vendor Name AP - 00282674 5/13/2009 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE AP - 00282674 5/13/2009 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE AP - 00282674 5/13/2009 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE AP - 00282674 5/13/2009 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE AP - 00282674 5/13/2009 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE AP - 00282674 5/13/2009 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE AP - 00282675 5/13/2009 R H F INC AP - 00282676 5/13/2009 RAETECH AP - 00282677 5/13/2009 RANCHO CUCAMONGA CHAMBER OF COMMEI AP - 00282677 5/13/2009 RANCHO CUCAMONGA CHAMBER OF COMMEI AP - 00282677 5/13/2009 RANCHO CUCAMONGA CHAMBER OF COMMEI AP - 00282677 5/13/2009 RANCHO CUCAMONGA CHAMBER OF COMME] AP - 00282677 5/13/2009 RANCHO CUCAMONGA CHAMBER OF COMME] AP - 00282677 5/13/2009 RANCHO CUCAMONGA CHAMBER OF COMME] AP - 00282679 5/13/2009 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL I AP - 00282679 5/13/2009 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL i AP - 00282679 5/13/2009 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL T AP - 00282679 5/13/2009 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL I AP - 00282679 5/13/2009 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL I AP - 00282679 5/13/2009 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL I AP - 00282679 5/13/2009 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL I AP - 00282679 5/13/2009 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL I AP - 00282679 5/13/2009 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL I AP - 00282679 5/13/2009 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL I' AP - 00282679 5/13/2009 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL I AP - 00282679 5/13/2009 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL I AP - 00282679 5/13/2009 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL I AP - 00282679 5/13/2009 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL I AP - 00282679 5/13/2009 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL I AP - 00282679 S/13/2009 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL I AP - 00282680 5/13/2009 REAVES, GERALDINE AP - 00282681 5/13/2009 RECORDED BOOKS LLC AP - 00282682 5/13/2009 REDFLEX TRAFFIC SYSTEMS INC AP - 00282683 5/13/2009 REDLANDS ARBITRATION AND MEDIATION SE AP - 00282684 5/13/2009 RICHLAND INVESTMENTS AP - 00282685 5/13/2009 RISING STARS AP - 00282686 5/13/2009 RIVERA, GEORGE AP - 00282686 5/13/2009 RIVERA, GEORGE AP-00282686 5/13/2009 RIVERA,GEORGE AP - 00282687 S/13/2009 RJM DESIGN GROUP INC AP - 00282687 5/13/2009 RJM DESIGN GROUP INC AP - 00282689 5/13/2009 SAFELITE FULFILLMENT INC AP - 00282690 5/13/2009 SAN BERDIARDINO COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPT AP - 00282691 5/13/2009 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPT AP - 00282692 5/13/2009 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPT AP - 00282693 5/13/2009 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY AP - 00282694 S/13/2009 SAN BERNARDINO CTY DEPT OF PUBLIC WOR] AP - 00282695 5/13/2009 SAN BERNARDINO, CITY OF AP - 00282696 Si 13/2009 SAN GABRIEL VALLEY WATER COMPANY AP - 00282697 5/13/2009 SCHNEIDER, DANIEL AP - 00282697 5/13/2009 SCHNEIDER, DANIEL AP - 00282697 5/13/2009 SCHNEIDER, DANIEL AP - 00282698 5/13/2009 SCOTT, MICHAEL AP - 00282699 S/13/2009 SCRIPPS CENTER FOR EXECUTIVE HEALTH User: VLOPEZ -Veroni ca Lopez Page: 15 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_POR"IRAI T_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout P48 Amount 466.32 158.71 40.7 S 334.72 1,357.71 40.00 114.00 2,650.00 35.00 100.00 35.00 35.00 35.00 35.00 100A0 100.00 50.00 50.00 50.00 50.00 50.00 50.00 50.00 50.00 50.00 50.00 50.00 100.00 100.00 ] 00.00 250.00 75.59 17,910.00 1,440.00 8,152.62 950.00 501.50 1,003.00 1,003.00 87,404.49 1,207.50 444.70 238.00 186.83 6,606.94 75.00 665.15 600.00 1.000.00 ]28.15 206.93 -300.00 400.00 2,623.00 Curren[ Dale: 05/27/200 Time: 11:26:2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P49 Agenda Check Register 5/13/2009 through 5/26/2009 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00282700 5/13/2009 SHRED IT 38.18 AP - 00282700 5/13/2009 SHRED IT 19.09 AP - 00282700 5/13/2009 SHRED IT 19.09 AP - 00282700 5/13/2009 SHRED IT 19.09 AP - 00282701 5/13/2009 SHRED PROS 300.00 AP - 00282703 5/13/2009 SLATER, THERESA 205.00 AP - 00282704 5/13/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ASSOC OF GOVERNM 75.00 AP - 00282709 5/13/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 2,758.59 AP - 00282709 5/13/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22,064.07 AP - 00282709 5/13/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 20.39 AP - 00282709 5/13/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 8,458.24 AP - 00282709 5/13/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 1,271.26 AP - 00282709 5/13/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 18.99 AP - 00282709 5/13/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 18.12 AP - 00282709 5/13/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 87.45 AP - 00282709 5/13/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 18.47 AP - 00282709 5/13/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 18.92 AP - 00282709 5/] 3/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 53.39 AP - 00282709 5/13/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON. 20.39 AP - 00282709 5/13/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 19.71 AP - 00282709 5/13/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 18.84 AP - 00282709 5/13/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 18.76 AP - 00282709 5/13/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 18.93 AP - 00282709 5/] 3/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 21.42 AP - 00282709 5/13/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 20.39 AP - 00282709 5/13/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 38.44 AP - 00282709 5/13/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 99.54 AP - 00282709 5/13/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 72.31 AP - 00282709 5/13/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 28.17 AP - 00282709 5/13/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 73.68 AP - 00282709 5/13/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 19.40 AP - 00282709 5/13/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 55.72 AP - 00282709 5/13/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 19.48 AP - 00282709 5/13/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 18.12 AP - 00282709 5/13/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 63.89 AP - 00282709 5/13/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 18.84 AP - 00282709 5/13/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 18.29 AP - 00282709 5/13/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 90.43 AP - 00282709 5/13/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 76.69 AP - 00282709 5/13/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 18.76 AP - 00282709 5/13/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 39.79 AP - 00282709 5/13/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 18.76 AP - 00282709 5/13/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 97.98 AP - 00282709 5/13/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 19.40 AP - 00282709 5/13/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 88.27 AP - 00282709 5/13/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 18.76 AP - 00282709 5/13/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 20.93 AP - 00282709 5/13/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 18.84 AP - 00282709 5/13/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 76.81 AP - 00282709 5/13/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 19.36 AP - 00282709 5/13/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 38.84 AP - 00282709 5/13/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 48.08 AP - 00282709 5/13/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 20.10 AP - 00282709 5/13/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 19.56 User: VLOPEZ - V"eronica Lopez Page: 16 Current Date: 05/27/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_R EG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 11:26:2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 8/13/2009 through 5/26/2009 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00282709 8/13/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 19.56 AP - 00282709 8/13/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 1932 AP - 00282709 8/13/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 19.83 AP - 00282709 8/]3/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 147.64 AP - 00282709 5/13/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 19.71 AP - 00282709 8/13/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 19.54 AP - 00282709 5/13/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 18.29 AP - 00282709 5/13/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 18.72 AP - 00282709 8/13/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 59.30 AP - 00282709 8/13/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 18.99 AP - 00282709 8/13/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.46 AP - 00282709 8/13/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 18.29 AP - 00282709 8/13/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 173.96 AP - 00282709 5/13/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 18.84 AP - 00282709 5/13/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 72.31 AP - 00282709 5/13/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 60.87 AP - 00282709 8/13/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 18.45 AP - 00282709 8/13/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 20.41 AP - 00282709 8/13/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 19.40 AP - 00282709 8/13/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 18.76 AP - 00282709 8/13/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 19.40 AP - 00282709 8/13/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 18.36 AP - 00282709 8/13/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNL4 EDISON 18.84 AP - 00282709 8/13/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 48.93 AP - 00282709 8/13/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 66.72 AP - 00282709 8/13/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 18.76 AP - 00282709 8/13/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 98.47 AP - 00282709 8/13/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 111.78 AP - 00282709 8/13/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 574.82 AP - 00282709 8/13/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 159.41 AP - 00282709 8/13/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 4,075.79 AP - 00282709 8/13/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 26.57 AP - 00282709 5/13/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 68.67 AP - 00282709 8/13/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 35.14 AP - 00282709 8/13/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 179.36 AP - 00282709 8/13/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 63.32 AP - 00282709 8/13/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 11.32 AP - 00282709 8/13/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 823.89 AP - 00282709 8/13/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 18.99 AP - 00282709 5/13/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 87.35 AP - 00282709 8/13/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 130.77 AP - 00282709 8/13/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 64.71 AP - 00282709 5/13/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 18.84 AP - 00282709 8/13/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 18.29 AP - 00282709 8/13/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 9.86 AP - 00282709 8/13/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 18.84 AP - 00282709 8/13/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 20.92 AP - 00282709 8/13/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 159.88 AP - 00282709 8/13/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 19.00 AP - 00282709 8/13/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 18.76 AP - 00282709 8/13/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 44.68 AP - 00282709 8/13/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 18.76 AP - 00282709 8/13/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.50 AP - 00282709 8/13/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 18.12 P50 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: t 7 Current Date: 08/27/200 Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Pomait Layout Timc: 1 I :26:2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P51 Asenda Check Resister 5/13/2009 through 5/26/2009 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00282709 513/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 18.76 AP - 00282709 5/13/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 19.64 AP - 00282709 5/13/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.33 AP - 00282709 5/13/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 4,589.51 AP - 00282709 5/13!2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 97.82 AP - 00282709 5/13/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 55.44 AP - 00282709 5/13/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 20.46 AP - 00282709 5/]3/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 57.35 AP - 00282709 5/13/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 20.30 AP - 00282709 5/13/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 9.64 AP - 00282709 5/13/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 101.96 AP - 00282709 5/13/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 64.65 AP - 00282709 5/13/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 31.81 AP - 00282709 5/13/2009 SOUTHERA' CALIFORNIA EDISON 106.34 AP - 00282709 5/13/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 155.20 AP - 00282709 S/13/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 157.64 AP - 00282709 5/13/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 57.98 AP - 00282709 5/13/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 21.51 AP - 00282709 5/13/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDTSON 43.88 AP - 00282709 5/13/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 18.84 AP - 00282709 5/13/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 507.29 AP - 00282709 5/13/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 18.92 AP - 00282709 5/13/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 18.84 AP - 00282709 5/13/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 18.84 AP - 00282709 5/13/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 67.57 AP - 00282709 5/13/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 18.89 AP - 00282709 5/13/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 133.05 AP - 00282709 5/13/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 74.87 AP - 00282709 5/13/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 20.39 AP - 00282709 5/13/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 39.39 AP - 00282709 5/13/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 19.54 AP - 00282709 5/13/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 54.64 AP - 00282709 5/13/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 6,102.58 AP - 00282709 5/13/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 21.26 AP - 00282709 5/13/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 20.39 AP - 00282709 5/]3/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 57.93 AP - 00282709 5/13/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13,222.64 AP - 00282709 5/13/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 699.57 AP - 00282709 5/13/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 18.76 AP - 00282709 5/13/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 18.84 AP - 00282709 5/13/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 19.53 AP - 00282709 5/13/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 356.10 AP - 00282709 5/13/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 138.43 AP - 00282709 5/13/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 21.39 AP - 00282709 5/13/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 280.15 AP - 00282709 5/13/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 135.73 AP - 00282709 5/13/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 18.29 AP - 00282709 5/13/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 18.29 AP - 00282709 5/13/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 18.29 AP - 00282709 5/13/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 18.93 AP - 00282709 5/13/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 84.72 AP - 00282709 5/13/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 79.19 AP - 00282709 5/13/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 18.45 AP - 00282709 5/13/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 172.23 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 18 Current Date: 05/27/200 Report:CR_AGEtiDA_ REG_ PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Reeister Pornait Layout Time: 1126:2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P52 Asenda Check Resister 5/13/2009 through 8/26/2009 Check No. Check Dale Vendor Name Amount AP - 00282710 8/13/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 1,864.41 AP - 00282711 8/13/2009 SPINNEY, JOE & EMILY 500.00 AP - 00282712 8/13/2009 STANKEVITZ, COLBETT 39.00 AP - 00282713 5/13/2009 STRATACOM 710.23 AP - 00282714 8/13/2009 SUNGARD PUBLIC SECTOR INC 23.18 AP - 0028271 S 8/13/2009 TIGER DIRECT 9,664.62 AP - 00282716 8/13/2009 TOOLS R US INC 86.52 AP - 00282717 5/13/2009 TRAFFIC OPERATIONS INC 5,325.51 AP - 00282718 5/13/2009 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 16,828.97 AP - 00282718 8/13/2009 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 496.54 AP - 00282718 5/13/2009 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 4,511.68 AP - 00282718 8/13/2009 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 25,027.79 AP - 00282718 8/13/2009 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 2,556.30 AP - 00282718 8/13/2009 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 1,487.22 AP - 00282718 5/13/2009 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 57.34 AP - 00282718 8/13/2009 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 2],521.30 AP - 00282718 8/13/2009 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 78,427.04 AP - 00282718 5/13/2009 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 31,119.44 AP - 00282719 5/13/2009 TURRETT PUNCH COMPANY INC 24.99 AP - 00282720 8/13/2009 UNITED PACIFIC SERVICES INC 967.00 AP - 00282720 5/13/2009 UNITED PACIFIC SERVICES INC 7,419.00 AP - 00282720 8/13/2009 UNITED PACIFIC SERVICES INC 3,957.00 AP - 00282720 8/13/2009 UNITED PACIFIC SERVICES INC 730.00 AP - 00282720 5/13/2009 UNITED PACIFIC SERVICES INC 3,068.00 AP - 00282720 8/13/2009 UNITED PACIFIC SERVICES INC 4,736.00 AP - 00282721 8/13/2009 UNITED SITE SERVICES OF CA [NC 127.88 AP - 00282721 5/13/2009 UNITED SITE SERVICES OF CA INC 218.30 AP - 00282722 8/13/2009 UPS 33.04 AP - 00282724 5/13/2009 VALLEY CREST TREE COMPANY 9.10 AP - 00282724 8/13/2009 VALLEY CREST TREE COMPANY 800.00 AP - 00282725 5/13/2009 VEND U COMPANY 101.38 AP-00282727 8/13/2009 VERIZON 2,119.01 AP - 00282727 5/13/2009 VERIZON 35.04 AP - 00282727 8/13/2009 VERIZON 36.18 AP - 00282727 5/13/2009 VERIZON 18.14 AP - 00282727 8/13/2009 VERIZON 78.40 AP - 00282727 8/13/2009 VERIZON 3,278.93 AP - 00282727 8/13/2009 VERIZON 18.14 AP-00282727 8/13/2009 VERIZON 18.14 AP - 00282727 8/13/2009 VERIZON 37.04 AP - 00282727 8/13/2009 VERIZON 36.16 AP - 00282727 5/13/2009 VERIZON 18.65 AP - 00282727 8/13/2009 VERIZON 87.93 AP - 00252727 8/13/2009 VERIZON 35.04 AP - 00282727 8/13/2009 VERIZON 35.07 AP-00282727 8/13/2009 VERIZON 87.93 AP - 00282727 5/13/2009 VERIZON 87.93 AP - 00282727 5/13/2009 VERIZON 41.86 AP - 00282727 8/]3/2009 VERIZON 318.78 AP - 00282727 8/13/2009 VERIZON 87.93 AP - 00282727 8/13/2009 VERIZON 87.93 AP - 00282727 5/13/2009 VERIZON 87.93 AP - 00282727 8/13/2009 VERIZON 36.83 AP - 00282727 8/13/2009 VERIZON 38.04 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 19 Current Date: 08/27/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_R EG_PORTRAI T_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: t 1:26:2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 5/13/2009 through 5/26/2009 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name AP - 00282727 5/13/2009 VERIZON AP - 00282727 S/13/2009 VERIZON AP - 00282727 5/13/2009 VERIZON AP - 00282727 5/13/2009 VERIZON AP - 00282727 5.13/2009 VERIZON AP - 00282727 5/13/2009 VERIZON AP - 00282727 5/13/2009 VERIZON AP - 00282727 5/13/2009 VERIZON AP - 00282727 5/13/2009 VERIZON AP - 00282727 5/13/2009 VERIZON AP - 00282727 5/13/2009 VERIZON AP-00282727 5/13/2009 VERIZON AP - 00282727 5/13/2009 VERIZON AP-00282727 5/13/2009 VERIZON AP-00282727 5/13/2009 VERIZON AP-00282727 5/13/2009 VERIZON AP - 00282727 5/13/2009 VERIZON AP - 00282727 5/13/2009 VERIZON AP - 00282728 5/13/2009 Verizon AP - 00282729 5/13/2009 VIASYN INC AP - 00282730 5/13/2009 VILLALON, ROSE AP - 00282730 5/13/2009 VILLALON, ROSE AP - 00282731 S/13/2009 WALGREENS CO AP - 00282732 5;13/2009 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO AP - 00282732 5/] 3/2009 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO AP - 00282732 5/13/2009 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO AP - 00282733 5/13/2009 WARREN & CO INC, CARL AP - 00282733 5/13/2009 WARREN R CO INC, CARL AP - 00282733 5/13/2009 WARREN & CO INC, CARL AP - 00282733 5/13/2009 WARREN & CO INC, CARI, AP - 00282734 5/13/2009 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY AP - 00282734 5/]3/2009 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY AP - 00282734 5/13/2009 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY AP - 00282735 5/13/2009 WEST COVINA WHOLESALE AP - 00282735 5/13/2009 WEST COVINA WHOLESALE AP - 00282736 5/13/2009 WEST END MATERIAL SUPPLY AP - 00282737 5/13/2009 WESTCOAST MEDIA AP - 00282738 5/13/2009 WESTERN UNIVERSITY AP - 00282738 5/13/2009 WESTERN UNIVERSITY AP - 00282738 5/13/2009 WESTERN UNIVERSITY AP - 00282738 5/13/2009 WESTERN UNIVERSITY AP - 00282738 5/13/2009 WESTERN UNIVERSITY AP - 00282738 5/13/2009 WESTERN UNIVERSITY AP - 00282738 5/] 3/2009 WESTERN UNIVERSITY AP - 00282739 5/13/2009 ZEE MEDICAL INC AP - 00282740 5/13/2009 Z[NNER CONSULTANTS AP - 00282742 5/20/2009 3T EQUIPMENT COMPANY INC AP - 00282743 5/20/2009 A K A PLUMBING AP - 00282744 5/20/2009 A R I REPROGRAPHICS AP - 00282744 5/20/2009 A & I REPROGRAPHICS AP - 00282744 5'20/2009 A & I REPROGRAPHICS AP - 00282745 5/20/2009 A AMAZING PEST CONTROL INC. AP - 00282746 5/20/2009 A AND A AUTOMOTIVE AP - 00282747 5/20/2009 AA EQUIPMENT RENTALS CO INC User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 20 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Pomait Layout P53 Amount 70.14 35.63 19.96 87.93 35.04 38.01 154.12 36.16 19.96 87.93 353.21 35.04 76.72 46.83 46.83 35.04 140.17 108.49 29.50 3,000.00 500.00 13.50 81.66 356.82 106.51 82.68 909.76 631.13 1,099.94 1,066.10 6].85 26.86 -25.32 126.73 61.18 532.29 900.50 43.00 35.00 43.00 35.00 43.00 35.00 43.00 458.43 87.50 218.28 1,000.00 67.97 195.21 170.09 550.00 121.26 66.15 Current Date: 05/27/200 Time: 11:26:2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA p54 Agenda Check Resister 5/13/2009 through 5 /2 612 0 0 9 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00282748 5/20/2009 ABC LOCKSMITHS 13.37 AP - 00282748 5/20/2009 ABC LOCKSMITHS 67.60 AP - 00282748 5/20/2009 ABC LOCKSMITHS 26.42 AP - 00282748 5/20/2009 ABC LOCKSMITHS 63.55 AP - 00282748 5/20/2009 ABC LOCKSMITHS 39.15 AP - 00282749 5/20/2009 ABLETRONICS 41.17 AP - 00282750 5/20/2009 ACTION AWARDS INC. 5.45 AP - 00282750 5/20/2009 ACTION AWARDS INC. 1,070.11 AP - 00282751 5/20/2009 ADVANCED UTILITY SYSTEMS CORP. 300.00 AP - 00282752 5/20/2009 ADVANTAGE SEALING SYSTEMS INC. 301.56 AP - 00282752 5/20/2009 ADVANTAGE SEALING SYSTEMS INC. 269.48 AP - 00282752 5/20/2009 ADVANTAGE SEALING SYSTEMS INC. 324.02 AP - 00282752 5/20/2009 ADVANTAGE SEALING SYSTEMS INC. 253.44 AP - 00282753 5/20/2009 AEF SYSTEMS CONSULTING INC 875.00 AP - 00282754 5/20/2009 AGUILERA, ISAIAH 240.00 AP - 00282755 5/20/2009 ALL AMERICAN ASPHALT 10,000.00 AP - 00282757 5/20/2009 ALLIANCE RESOURCE CONSULTING LLC 9,159.14 AP - 00282758 5/20/2009 AMERICAN BODY ARMOR & EQUIPMENT INC. 108.75 AP - 00282759 5/20/2009 AMERICAN ROTARY BROOM CO. INC. 257.09 AP - 00282759 5/20/2009 AMERICAN ROTARY BROOM CO. INC. 385.64 AY - 00282761 5/20/2009 AMO RECOVERIES INC. 1,428.00 AP - 00282761 5/20/2009 AMO RECOVERIES INC. 97.50 AP - 00282762 5/20/2009 ANTHEM BLUE CROSS OF CALIFORNIA 150,104.18 AP - 00282763 5/20/2009 APG COMPANY 1Q258.08 AP - 00282764 5/20/2009 APPA 525.00 AP - 00282765 5/20/2009 APPLIED METERING TECHNOLOGIES INC li,200.34 AP - 00282766 5/20/2009 APX ALARM SECURITY SOLUTIONS INC. 25.00 AP - 00282767 5/20/2009 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES 6.70 AP - 00282768 5/20/2009 ARCHITERRA DESIGN GROUP 52.98 AP - 00282768 5/20/2009 ARCHITERRA DESIGN GROUP 1,125.00 AP - 00282769 5/20/2009 ARCHIVE MANAGEMENT SERVICES [NC 791.26 AP - 00282770 5/20/2009 ARMANDOS TERMITE & PEST CONTROL 150.00 AP - 00282771 5/20/2009 ASTRUM UTILITY SERVICES 7,312.50 AP - 00282771 5/20/2009 ASTRUM UTILITY SERVICES 8,062.50 AP - 00282772 5/20/2009 ATRIA DEL REY 1,250.00 AP - 00282773 5/20/2009 AUDIO EDITIONS 8.66 AP - 00282774 5/20/2009 AUFBAU CORPORATION 16,920.00 AP - 00282775 5/20/2009 AUTO BODY 2000 1,217.68 AP - 00282776 5/20/2009 AUTO SPECIALISTS 95.28 AP - 00282776 5/20/2009 AUTO SPECIALISTS 26.17 AP - 00282776 5/202009 AUTO SPECIALISTS 83.82 AP - 00282776 5/20/2009 AUTO SPECIALISTS 73.19 AP - 00282776 5/20/2009 AUTO SPECIALISTS 59.29 AP - 00282777 5/20/2009 AYALA, JOSE 500.00 AP - 00282778 5/20/2009 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 246.47 AP - 00282778 5/20/2009 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 133.61 AP - 00282778 5/20/2009 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 153.61 AP - 00282778 5/20/2009 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 609.24 AP - 00282778 5/20/2009 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 376.64 AP - 00282778 5/20'2009 B AATD K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 1,05056 AP - 00282778 5/20/2009 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 72.85 AP - 00282778 5/20/2009 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 36.70 AP - 00282779 5/20/2009 BADGE A MINIT 88.43 AP - 00282780 5/20/2009 BALDEON, CARLOS 558.25 _ _ User: VLOPEZ -Veron ica Lopez Page: 21 Current Date: 05/27/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAI T_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Pomait Layout Time: 11:26:2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P55 Agenda Check Resister 5/13/2009 through 5/26/2009 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amoun[ AP - 00282781 S/20/2009 BALLOONS R US INC/[JNITED CALIF FACTORS 94.07 AP - 00282782 5/20/2009 BARNES AND NOBLE 544.60 AP - 00282782 5/20/2009 BARNES AND NOBLE 384.70 AP - 00282782 5/20/2009 BARNES AND NOBLE 212.02 AP - 00282783 5/20/2009 BEARD PROVENCHER AND ASSOC INC 1,818.00 AP - 00282783 5/20/2009 BEARD PROVENCHER AND ASSOC INC 2,538.00 AP - 00282784 5/20/2009 BEARINGS AND DRIVES INC 644.81 AP - 00282785 5/20/2009 BELMUDES, ELLIE 65.00 AP - 00282786 5/20/2009 BERNARD, JEREMY 990.00 AP - 00282787 5/20/2009 BEST BEST AND KRIEGER 427.50 AP - 00282788 5/20/2009 BISHOP COMPANY 272.64 AP - 00282788 5/20/2009 BISHOP COMPANY 611.18 AP - 00282789 5/20/2009 BLEVINS, DAVE 581.75 AP - 00282789 5/20/2009 BLEVINS, DAVE 290.88 AP - 00282789 5/20/2009 BLEVINS, DAVE 436.32 AP - 00282789 5/20/2009 BLEVINS, DAVE 727.18 AP - 00282789 5/20/2009 BLEVINS, DAVE 872.62 AP - 00282790 5/20/2009 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC. 1,137.53 AP - 00282791 5/20/2009 BRADLEY, EB 66.98 AP - 00282793 5/20/2009 BRODART BOOKS 49.20 AP - 00282793 5/20/2009 BRODART BOOKS 1,262.10 AP - 00282793 5/20/2009 BRODART BOOKS 14.70 AP - 00282793 5/20/2009 BRODART BOOKS 24.47 AP - 00282793 5/20/2009 BRODART BOOKS 14.13 AP - 00282793 5/20/2009 BRODART BOOKS 29.32 AP - 00282793 5/20/2009 BRODART BOOKS 377.27 AP - 00282793 5/20/2009 BRODART BOOKS 23.01 AP - 00282793 5/20/2009 BRODART BOOKS 168.94 AP - 00282793 5/20/2009 BRODART BOOKS 77.04 AP - 00282793 5/20/2009 BRODART BOOKS 114.64 AP - 00282793 5/20/2009 BRODART IIOOKS 707.77 AP - 00282793 5/20/2009 BRODART BOOKS 201.31 AP - 00282793 5/20/2009 BRODART BOOKS 70.57 AP - 00282793 5/20/2009 BRODART BOOKS 12.97 AP - 00282793 5/20/2009 BRODART BOOKS 127.08 AP - 00282793 5/20/2009 BRODART BOOKS 18.58 AP - 00282793 5/20/2009 BRODART BOOKS 18.59 AP - 00282793 5/20/2009 BRODART BOOKS ~ 15.26 AP - 00282793 5/20/2009 BRODART BOOKS 14.67 AP - 00282793 5/20/2009 BRODART BOOKS 106.68 AP - 00282793 5/20/2009 BRODART BOOKS 62.00 AP - 00282793 5/20/2009 BRODART BOOKS 491.23 AP - 00282793 5/20/2009 BRODART BOOKS 73.45 AP - 00282793 5/20/2009 BRODART BOOKS 17.24 AP - 00282793 5/20/2009 BRODART BOOKS 152.63 AP - 00282793 5/20/2009 BRODART BOOKS 10.78 AP - 00282793 5/20/2009 BRODART BOOKS 492.15 AP - 00282793 5/20/2009 BRODART BOOKS 4.30 AP - 00282793 5/20/2009 BRODART BOOKS 4.30 AP - 00282793 5/20/2009 BRODART BOOKS 6.48 AP - 00282793 5/20/2009 BRODART BOOKS 12.90 AP - 00282793 5/20/2009 BRODART BOOKS 4.30 AP - 00282793 5/20%2009 BRODART BOOKS 81.23 AP - 00282793 5/20/2009 BRODART BOOKS 12.97 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 22 Current Date: 05/27/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_ REG_PORTRAI T_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Pomait Layout Timc: 11:26:2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Resister 5/13/2009 through 5/26/2009 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name AP - 00282793 5/20/2009 BRODART BOOKS AP - 00282793 5/20/2009 BRODART BOOKS AP - 00282793 5/20/2009 BRODART BOOKS AP - 00282793 5/20/2009 BRODART BOOKS AP - 00282793 5/20/2009 BRODART BOOKS AP - 00282793 5/20/2009 BRODART BOOKS AP - 00282793 5/20/2009 BRODART BOOKS AP - 00282793 5/20/2009 BRODART BOOKS AP - 00282793 5/20/2009 BRODART BOOKS AP - 00282793 5/20/2009 BRODART BOOKS AP - 00282793 5/20/2009 BRODART BOOKS AP - 00282793 5/20/2009 BRODART BOOKS AP - 00282793 5/20/2009 BRODART BOOKS AP - 00282793 5/20/2009 BRODART BOOKS AP - 00282793 5/20/2009 BRODART BOOKS AP - 00282793 5/20/2009 BRODART BOOKS AP - 00282793 5/20/2009 BRODART BOOKS AP - 00282793 5/20/2009 BRODART BOOKS AP - 00282793 5/20/2009 BRODART BOOKS AP - 00282793 5/20/2009 BRODART BOOKS AP - 00282793 5/20/2009 BRODART BOOKS AP - 00282793 5/20/2009 BRODART BOOKS AP - 00282793 5/20/2009 BRODART BOOKS AP - 00282793 5/20/2009 BRODART BOOKS AP - 00282793 5/20/2009 BRODART BOOKS AP - 00282793 5/20/2009 BRODART BOOKS AP - 00282793 5/20/2009 BRODART BOOKS AP - 00282793 5/20/2009 BRODART BOOKS AP - 00282793 5/20/2009 BRODART BOOKS AP - 00282793 5/20/2009 BRODART BOOKS AP - 00282793 5/20/2009 BRODART BOOKS AP - 00282793 5/20/2009 BRODART BOOKS AP - 00282793 5/20/2009 BRODART BOOKS AP - 00282793 5/20/2009 BRODART BOOKS AP - 00282793 5/20/2009 BRODART BOOKS AP - 00282793 5/20/2009 BRODART BOOKS AP - 00282794 5/20/2009 BROTHERS CUSTOM POOLS & SPAS INC. AP - 00282795 5/20/2009 BURR CYCLES INC, JOHN AP - 00282795 5/20/2009 BURR CYCLES [NC, JOHN AP - 00282795 5/20/2009 BURR CYCLES INC, JOHN AP - 00282795 5/20/2009 BURR CYCLES INC, JOHN AP - 00282795 5/20/2009 BURR CYCLES INC, JOHN AP - 00282796 5/20/2009 BUTSKO UTILITY DESIGN INC. AP - 00282797 5/20/2009 CACEO AP - 00282797 5/20/2009 CACEO AP - 00282798 5/20/2009 CADY, COREY AP - 00282799 5/20/2009 CAL PERS LONG TERM CARE AP - 00282801 5/20/2009 CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE TAX BOARD AP - 00282802 5/20/2009 CALIFORNIA STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATIOP AP - 00282803 5/20/2009 CALSENSE AP - 00282804 5/20/2009 CDW GOVERNMENT INC. AP - 00282804 5/20/2009 CDW GOVERNMENT INC. AP - 00282805 5/20/2009 CEBALLOS, LINDA AP - 00282806 5/20/2009 CH[LD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT DIVISION User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 23 ReporLCK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Pomait Layout P56 Amoun[ 152.91 17.20 4.30 8.60 68.73 236.30 38.76 4.30 6.48 6.48 32.40 10.78 12.90 17.26 34.37 30.07 21.48 133.18 43.12 51.56 4.30 473.44 27.68 25.40 63.91 19.52 62.52 41.85 40.14 7.05 170.67 4.30 4.30 30.07 42.95 17.18 200.00 174.03 82.65 241.61 304.57 446.77 t 3,036.90 10.00 10.00 600.00 480.96 25.00 1,040.05 277.21 117.00 1.039.10 100.00 175.00 Current Date: 05/27/200 Time: 11:26:2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Resister 5/13/2009 through 5/26/2009 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name AP - 00282807 5/20/2009 CHRISTIAN BROTHERS MORTUARY AP - 00282808 5/20/2009 CINEVATIVE AP - 00282809 5/20/2009 CLABBY, SANDRA AP - 00282810 5/20/2009 CLEAN STREET INC. AP - 00282811 5/20/2009 COAST RECREATION INC AP - 00282812 5/20/2009 COLLEGE FUNDING STRATEGIES AP - 00282812 5/20/2009 COLLEGE FUNDING STRATEGIES AP - 00282813 5/20/2009 CONCEPT POWDER COATING AP - 00282814 5/20/2009 CONTINENTAL AMERICAN INSURANCE COMP AP - 00282815 5/20/2009 CONTINENTAL AMERICAN INSURANCE COMP AP - 00282817 5/20/2009 COTTONWOOD ELEMENTARY AP - 00282818 5/20/2009 CROCKER, ALLAN AP - 00282819 5/20/2009 CRUZ, JOSE AP - 00282820 5/20/2009 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP - 00282820 5/20/2009 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP - 00282820 5/20/2009 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP - 00282820 5/20/2009 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP - 00282820 5/20/2009 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP - 00282821 5/20/2009 D AND K CONCRETE COMPANY AP - 00282821 5/20/2009 D AND K CONCRETE COMPANY AP - 00282821 5/20/2009 D AND K CONCRETE COMPANY AP - 00282821 5/20/2009 D AND K CONCRETE COMPANY AP - 00282821 5/20/2009 D AND K CONCRETE COMPANY AP - 00282822 5/20/2009 DAMS LAWNMOWER CENTER AP -00282822 5/20/2009 DANSLAWNMOWERCENTER AP - 00282822 5/20/2009 DANS LAWNMOWER CENTER AP - 00282823 5/20/2009 DAPPER TIRE CO AP - 00282823 5/20/2009 DAPPER TIRE CO AP - 00282823 5/20/2009 DAPPER TIRE CO AP - 00282823 5/20/2009 DAPPER TIRE CO AP - 00282823 5/20/2009 DAPPER TIRE CO AP - 00282824 5/20/2009 DATA QUICIh AP - 00282825 5/20/2009 DELTA DENTAL AP - 00282826 5/20/2009 DELTA MICROIMAGING INC AP - 00282827 5/20/2009 DGO AUTO DETAILING AP - 00282829 5/20/2009 DODSON 6 ASSOCIATES, TOM AP - 00282830 5/20/2009 DORSEY, TRACY AP - 00282831 5/20/2009 DREAM SHAPERS AP - 00282832 5/20/2009 DUNN EDWARDS CORPORATION AP - 00282832 5/20/2009 DUNN EDWARDS CORPORATION AP - 00282832 5/20/2009 DUNN EDWARDS CORPORATION AP - 00282833 5/20/2009 DUNK, ANNE MARIE AP - 00282833 5/20/2009 DUNN, ANNE MARIE AP - 00282834 5/20/2009 ECHO FIRE PROTECTION CO. AP - 00282835 5/20/2009 EDFUND AP - 00282836 5/20/2009 EIGHTH AVENUE ENTERPRISE LLC AP - 00282837 5/20/2009 ELLIOTT, CINDY AP - 00282838 5/20/2009 EMCOR SERVICE AP - 00282838 5/20/2009 EMCOR SERVICE AP - 00282839 5/20/2009 EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT DEPT. AP - 00282841 5/202009 EN POINTS TECHNOLOGIES SALES INC AP - 00282841 5/20/2009 EN POINTS TECHNOLOGIES SALES INC AP - 00282842 5/20/2009 ESPINO'S COP SHOP INC AP - 00282843 5/202009 SWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 24 Report:CK _AGENDA_REG _PORTRAI T_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Pomait Layout P57 Amount 22.00 866.00 1,000.00 3,520.00 494.00 100.00 106.00 160.00 16.39 140.55 21.00 55.00 88.00 2,636.70 35.91 211.19 188.63 267.00 722.10 434.47 638.37 410.80 554.63 165.19 21,162.02 10,423.08 245.77 245.77 394.24 230.59 619.78 ] 30.50 39,219.74 10,174.75 150.00 2,335.00 70.52 250.00 20.63 43.87 176.26 1,897.80 228.00 112.93 t 64.91 34.80 70.00 6,921.57 17,18659 409.02 27,759.96 4,839.38 135.00 295.96 Curren[ Dale: 05/27/200 Timc: 11:26:2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P58 Asenda Check Resister 5/13/2009 through 5/26/2009 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00282843 5/20/2009 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 292.82 AP - 00282843 5/20/2009 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 14.34 AP - 00282843 5/20/2009 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 292.82 AP - 00282843 5/20/2009 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 1 SS.33 AP - 00282543 520/2009 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 419.42 AP - 00282843 Si20/2009 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 484.48 AP - 00282843 5/20/2009 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 2,637.73 AP - 00282843 5/20/2009 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 457.97 AP - 00282843 5/20/2009 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 43.43 AP - 00282844 5/20/2009 EXPERIAN. 75.00 AP - 00282845 5/20/2009 EXPRESS BRAKE SUPPLY 58.42 AP - 00282845 5/20/2009 EXPRESS BRAKE SUPPLY 52.53 AP - 00282846 5/20/2009 FASTENAL COMPANY 538.89 AP - 00282847 S/20/2009 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORD 8.84 AP - 00282847 5/20/2009 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 24.86 AP - 00282847 5/20/2009 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 17.04 AP - 00282847 5/20/2009 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 18.08 AP - 00282847 5/20/2009 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 27.95 AP - 00282847 5/20/2009 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 16.76 AP - 00282847 5/20/2009 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 15.02 AP - 00282847 5/20/2009 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 15.02 AP - 00282848 5/20/2009 FOOTHILL FAMILY SHELTER 405.00 AP - 00282849 5/20/2009 FORD OF UPLAND INC 410.96 AP - 00282849 5/20/2009 FORD OF UPLAND INC 8 t.80 AP - 00282850 5/20/2009 FOREMOST SILKSCREEN AND EMBROIDERY 530.90 AP - 00282850 5/20/2009 FOREMOST SILKSCREEN AND EMBROIDERY 119.63 AP - 00282852 5/20/2009 FRAZEE PAINT CENTER 396.42 AP - 00282854 5/20/2009 GARY LINDSEY ARTIST SERVICES 8,800.00 AP - 00282856 5/20/2009 GILBERT, VELMA 100.00 AP - 00282857 5/20/2009 GILLISON, JOHN 223.30 AP - 00282859 5/20/2009 GOLF VENTURES WEST 47.76 AP - 00282860 5/20/2009 GONZALES, RUDY 550.00 AP - 0028286 t 5/20/2009 GRAHAM AGENCY 4,151.71 AP - 00282862 5/20/2009 GRAINGER 27.90 AP - 00282862 5/20/2009 GRAINGER 27.90 AP - 00282862 5/20/2009 GRAINGER 228.28 AP - 00282862 5/20/2009 GRAINGER 593.40 AP - 00282862 5/20/2009 GRAINGER -523.67 AP - 00282862 5/20/2009 GRAINGER 78.23 AP - 00282862 5/20/2009 GRAINGER 3,803.96 AP - 00282862 5/20/2009 GRAINGER -17.06 AP - 00282862 5/20/2009 GRAINGER 82.80 AP - 00282862 5/20/2009 GRAINGER 17.16 AP - 00282862 5/20/2009 GRAINGER 186.84 AP - 00282862 5/20/2009 GRAINGER 64.50 AP - 00282862 5/20/2009 GRAINGER 222.80 AP - 00282862 5/20/2009 GRAINGER 140.03 AP - 00282863 5/20/2009 GRANT III, VINCENT 120.00 AP - 00282864 5/20/2009 GRAPHICS FACTORY PRINTING INC. 353.44 AP - 00282864 5/20/2009 GRAPHICS FACTORY PRINTING INC. 432.28 AP - 00282865 5/20/2009 GRESSCO LTD 808.50 AP - 00282865 5/20/2009 GRESSCO LTD 55.65 AP - 00282865 5/20/2009 GRESSCO LTD 55.65 AP - 00282865 5/20/2009 GRESSCO LTD 808.50 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 2S Current Date: 05/27/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_ REG_PORTRAI T_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Pornait Layout Time: 11:26:2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 8/13/2009 throueh 8/26/2009 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name AP - 00282866 5/20/2009 GRIFFITH COMPANY AP - 00282868 5/20/2009 GUZMAN, AIDA AP - 00282869 8/20/2009 HALL & FOREMAN INC AP - 00282869 8/20/2009 HALL & FOREMAN INC AP - 00282869 8/20/2009 HALL & FOREMAN INC AP - 00282871 8/20/2009 HARALAMBOS BEVERAGE COMPANY AP - 00282872 8/20/2009 HARTM MIERAS & MORRIS LAW FIRM AP - 00282873 5/20/2009 HCS CUTLER STEEL CO AP - 00282874 8/20/2009 HENZAN, BIBIANA AP - 00282876 5/20/2009 HOGLE-IRELAND AP - 00282876 5/20/2009 HOGLE-IRELAND AP - 00282877 8/20/2009 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC AP - 00282877 5/20/2009 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC AP - 00282877 8/20/2009 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC AP - 00282877 5/20/2009 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC AP - 00282877 8/20/2009 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC AP - 00282877 8/20/2009 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC AP - 00282877 8/20/2009 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC AP - 00282878 5/20/2009 HOLT, WILLIAM AP - 00282878 5/20/2009 HOLT, WILLIAM AP - 00282878 8/20/2009 HOLT, WILLIAM AP - 00282881 5/20/2009 HYDRO TEK SYSTEMS INC AP - 00282882 5/20/2009 HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS INC AP - 00282882 8/20/2009 HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS INC AP - 00282882 5/20/2009 HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS INC AP - 00282882 5/20/2009 HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS INC AP - 00282882 8/20/2009 HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS INC AP - 00282882 8/20/2009 HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS INC AP - 00282882 8/20/2009 HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS INC AP - 00282883 8/20/2009 IAA P AP - 00282883 8/20/2009 IAA P AP - 00282883 8/20/2009 IAA P AP - 00282883 8/20/2009 IAA P AP - 00282885 8/20/2009 IDEAL GLASS TINTING AP - 00282886 8/20/2009 IGNITE DESIGN AND ADVERTISING AP - 00282887 5/20/2009 IMPERIAL SPRINKLER SUPPLY INC AP - 00282888 5/20/2009 IMSA AP - 00282888 8/20/2009 IMSA AP - 00282888 8/20/2009 IMSA AP - 00282888 8/20/2009 IMSA AP - 00282888 8/20/2009 IMSA AP - 00282889 8/20/2009 INLAND CUSTOM PUBLISHING GROUP AP - 00282890 8/20/2009 INLAND EMPIRE FAMILY AP - 00282891 8/20/2009 INLAND EMPIRE TOURS AND TRANSPORTATIC AP - 00282892 8/20/2009 INLAND PRESORT & MAILING SERVICES AP - 00282893 8/20/2009 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN AP - 00282893 8/20/2009 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN AP - 00282893 8/20/2009 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN AP - 00282893 8/20/2009 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN AP - 00282893 8/20/2009 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN AP - 00282893 8/20/2009 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETLti AP - 00282894 8/20/2009 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN AP - 00282894 8/20/2009 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN AP - 00282897 8/20/2009 INTERSTATE BATTERIES User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 26 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG _PORTRAI T_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Pornait Layoui P59 Amount 10,000.00 250.00 572.00 4,004.40 240.00 493.95 250.00 14.28 500.00 14,427.50 1,617.00 50.00 1,083.75 897.34 420.87 100.00 100.00 901.53 600.00 740.00 1,840.00 175.3] 332.78 358.88 543.29 35.02 72.98 37.66 -282.81 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 205.00 1,875.00 64.78 230.00 220.00 220.00 220.00 220.00 750.00 1,080.00 965.00 91.73 420.00 495.00 143.26 837.75 495.00 420.00 216.00 216.00 677.21 Current Date: 05/27/200 Timc: 11:26:2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P60 Agenda Check Register 5/13/2009 through 5/26/2009 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00282897 5/20/2009 INTERSTATE BATTERIES 95.88 AP - 00282898 5/20/2009 INTERWEST CONSULTING GROUP INC 2,S6S.00 AP - 00282899 5/20/2009 IRON MOUNTAIN OSDP 698.99 AP - 00282900 5/20/2009 J D C INC 10,618.27 AP - 00282900 5/20/2009 J D C INC 5,500.00 AP - 00282900 5/20/2009 J D C INC 275.41 AP - 00282901 5/20/2009 JACKSON, FLOSSIE 250.00 AP - 00282902 5/20/2009 7AUREGUI &CULVER INC 12,265.37 AP - 00282902 5/20/2009 JAUREGUI &CULVER INC -1,226.54 AP - 00282903 5/20/2009 JAURIGUE, CELIA 64.00 AP - 00282904 5/20/2009 JIM GAMBLE PUPPET PRODUCTIONS 2,250.00 AP - 00282905 5/20/2009 KATZ OUTDOOR FITNESS 355.20 AP - 00282905 5/20/2009 KATZ OUTDOOR FITNESS 192.00 AP - 00282907 5/20/2009 KRIEGER, ED 500.00 AP - 00282908 5/20/2009 LAKEWOOD, CITY OF 50.00 AP - 00282910 5/20/2009 LEAL, RUTH 67.50 AP - 00282911 5/20/2009 LEMAR PRODUCTIONS 360.00 AP - 00282913 5/20/2009 LINDLEY FIRE PROTECTION 1,000.00 AP - 00282915 5/20/2009 LOPEZ, EDNA 982.81 AP - 00282916 5/20/2009 LOPEZ, LANI 64.00 AP - 00282917 5/20/2009 MACAT[.JLA, MAUREEN 250.00 AP - 00282918 5/20/2009 MACDON'ALD, JAMIE 1.140.00 AP - 00282918 5/20/2009 MACDONALD, JAMIE 140.25 AP - 00282919 5/20/2009 MAIN STREET SIGNS 169.65 AP - 00282919 5/20/2009 MAIN STREET SIGNS 163.13 AP - 00282920 5/20/2009 MAINLINE INFORMATION SYSTEMS 7,492.50 AP - 00282920 5/20/2009 MAINLINE INFORMATION SYSTEMS 2,291.92 AP - 00282922 5/20/2009 MARQUETTE COMMERCIAL FINANCE 226.20 AP - 00282922 5/20/2009 MARQUETTE COMMERCIAL FINANCE 226.20 AP - 00282923 5/20/2009 MATERIAL SALES UNLIMITED 602.97 AP - 00282924 5/20/2009 MCI 16.33 AP - 00282924 5/20/2009 MCI 17.86 AP - 00282924 5/20/2009 MCI 3.36 AP - 00282924 5/20/2009 MCI 17.86 AP - 00282925 5/20/2009 MIDWEST TAPE 125.54 AP - 00282925 5/20/2009 MIDWEST TAPE 125.54 AP - 00282925 5/20/2009 MIDWEST TAPE 12.79 AP - 00282925 5/20/2009 MIDWEST TAPE 71.98 AP - 00282925 5/20/2009 MIDWEST TAPE 76.97 AP - 00282925 5/20/2009 MIDWEST TAPE 11.99 AP - 00282929 5/20/2009 MOUNTAIN VIEW SMALL ENG REPAIR 45.00 AP - 00282929 5/20/2009 MOUNTAIN VIEW SMALL ENG REPAIR 153.85 AP - 00282930 5/20/2009 MSA INLAND EMPIRE/DESERT CHAPTER 15.00 AP - 00282931 5/20/2009 MSA INLAND EMPIRE/DESERT CHAPTER 90.00 AP - 00282932 520/2009 MUNICIPAL CODE CORPORATION 75.00 AP - 00282932 5/20/2009 MLNICIPAL CODE CORPORATION 75.00 AP - 00282933 5/20/2009 N I G P 400.00 AP - 00282934 5/20/2009 NAPA AUTO PARTS 95.16 AP - 00282934 5/20/2009 NAPA AUTO PARTS 127.78 AP - 00282934 5/20/2009 NAPA AUTO PARTS t 3.99 AP - 00282934 5/20/2009 NAPA AUTO PARTS 806.29 AP - 00282935 5/20/2009 NASH, JESSICA 990.00 AP - 00282936 5/20/2009 NATIONAL ASSOC OF TOWN WATCH 25.00 AP - 00282937 5/20/2009 NATIONAL CONSTRUCTION RENTALS INC 822.35 User. VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 27 Current Date: 05/27/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_ REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Pornait Layout Time: 11:26:2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P6y Agenda Check Register 5/13/2009 through 5/26/2009 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00282937 5/20'2009 NATIONAL CONSTRUCTION RENTALS INC 822.35 AP - 00282938 5/20/2009 NATIONAL DATA & SURVEYING SERVICES 222.00 AP - 00282938 5'20/2009 NATIONAL DATA & SURVEYING SERVICES 3,036.00 AP - 00282938 5/20/2009 NATIONAL DATA & SURVEYING SERVICES 44.00 AP - 00282939 5!20/2009 NEXTEL 101.75 AP-00282941 520/2009 NWOSU,LORETHA 39.60 AP - 00282942 5/20/2009 OCLC INC 47.34 AP - 00282943 5/20/2009 OFFICE DEPOT 68.50 AP - 00282943 5/20/2009 OFFICE DEPOT 301.05 AP - 00282943 5/20/2009 OFFICE DEPOT -33.16 AP - 00282943 5/20/2009 OFFICE DEPOT 119.15 AP - 00282943 5/20/2009 OFFICE DEPOT 33.16 AP - 00282943 5/20/2009 OFFICE DEPOT 33.16 AP - 00282943 5/20/2009 OFFICE DEPOT 28.44 AP - 00282943 5/20/2009 OFFICE DEPOT 14.20 AP - 00282943 5/20/2009 OFFICE DEPOT 32.37 AP - 00282943 5/20/2009 OFFICE DEPOT 299.50 AP - 00282943 5/20/2009 OFFICE DEPOT 36.32 AP - 00282944 5/20/2009 ONTARIO, CITY OF 163.39 AP - 00282946 5/20/2009 ORTEGA, EVANGELINE 500.00 AP - 00282947 5/20/2009 OVERPACK, NANCIE MARIE 225.00 AP - 00282948 5/20/2009 OWEN ELECTRIC INC 38.06 AP - 00282949 5/20/2009 PAL CAMPAIGN 82.00 AP - 00282950 5/20/2009 PARS 3,500.00 AP - 00282951 5/20/2009 PATTON SALES CORP 270.50 AP - 00282951 8/20/2009 PATTON SALES CORP 35.90 AP - 00282951 5/20/2009 PATTON SALES CORP 18.27 AP - 00282952 5/20/2009 PERVO PAIIJT CO 1,540.99 AP - 00282953 5!20/2009 PETES ROAD SERVICE INC 60.00 AP - 00282954 5!20/2009 PHONG, LORRAINE 300.00 AP - 00282955 5/20/2009 PIONEER MANUFACTURING 2,165.89 AP - 00282955 5/20/2009 PIONEER MANUFACTURING 108.58 AP - 00282956 5/20/2009 PIP PRINTING 405.58 AP - 00282957 5/20/2009 PIRANHA POOL & SPA CONSTRUCTORS INC 200.00 AP - 00282958 5/20/2009 POSTER SOLUTION'S 82.00 AP - 00282958 5/20/2009 POSTER SOLUTIONS 13.16 AP - 00282959 5/20/2009 PRAXAIR DISTRIBUTION INC 113.30 AP - 00282960 5/20/2009 PRE-PAID LEGAL SERVICES INC 11.40 AP - 00282960 5/20/2009 PRE-PAID LEGAL SERVICES INC 255.09 AP - 00282961 5/20/2009 QWEST 5.33 AP - 00282962 5/20/2009 RANCHO CUCAMONGA CHAMBER OF COMME] 200.00 AP - 00282963 5/20/2009 RANCHO GLASS & MIRRORS 266.11 AP - 00282964 5/20/2009 RANDOM HOUSE INC 44.97 AP - 00282965 5/20/2009 RAYBALLOONS 494.44 AP - 00282966 5/20/2009 RCPFA 8,532.45 AP - 00282967 5/20/2009 RDO EQUIPMENT CO 425.43 AP - 00282969 5/20/2009 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 2,117.20 AP - 00282969 5/20/2009 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 627.00 AP - 00282969 5/20/2009 RICHARDS WATSON ANA GERSHON 1,171.50 AP - 00282969 5/20/2009 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 165.00 AP - 00282969 5/20/2009 RICHARDS W ATSON AND GERSHON 4,237.20 AP - 00282969 5/20/2009 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 599.79 AP - 00282969 5/20%2009 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 963.80 AP - 00282969 5/20/2009 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 47.20 User: VLOPEZ -Veron ica Lopez Page: 28 Current Date: 05/27/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_R EG_PORTRAI T_RC - CK: Aeenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 11:26:2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P62 Agenda Check RePister 5/13/2009 through 5/26/2009 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00282969 5/20/2009 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 181.50 AP - 00282969 5/20/2009 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 16.50 AP - 00282970 5/20/2009 RINGSTAD & SANDERS LLP 1,472.50 AP - 00282971 5/20/2009 RIPPETOE MILES LLP 216.30 AP - 00282971 5/20/2009 RIPPETOE MILES LLP 7,400.52 AP - 00282971 5/20/2009 RIPPETOE MILES LLP 148.95 AP - 00282971 5/20/2009 RIPPETOE MILES LLP 3,426.29 AP - 00282972 5/20/2009 ROBLES SR, RAUL P 75.00 AP - 00282972 5/20/2009 ROBLES SR, RAUL P 135.00 AP - 00282973 5/20/2009 RODRIGUEZ INC, R Y 180.00 AP - 00282977 5/20/2009 SAFEWAY SIGN COMPANY 3,409.87 AP - 00282977 5/20/2009 SAFEWAY SIGN COMPANY 372.15 AP - 00282978 5/20/2009 SAN ANTONIO MATERIALS 133.98 AP - 00282978 5/20/2009 SAN ANTONIO MATERIALS 459.52 AP - 00282979 5/20/2009 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPT 3,109.26 AP - 00282980 5/20/2009 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPT 201.90 AP - 00282981 5/20/2009 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY 50.00 AP - 00282982 5/20/2009 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY SUN 3,168.91 AP - 00282983 5/20/2009 SAN BERNARDIIQO COUNTY 2,535.50 AP - 00282984 5/20/2009 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY 50.00 AP - 00282985 5/20/2009 SAN BERNARDINO CTY DEPT OF PUBLIC HEAL 25.00 AP - 00282986 5/20/2009 SAN BERNARDINO CTY FIRE DEPARTMENT 49,728.00 AP - 00282987 5/20/2009 SANTOS, SAUL 500.00 AP - 00282988 5/20/2009 SBPEA 913.77 AP - 00282989 5/20/2009 SC FUELS 9,522.87 AP - 00282989 5/20/2009 SC FUELS 6,895.87 AP - 00282991 5/20/2009 SCOTT, DIANA 375.00 AP - 00282992 5/20/2009 SEMMATERIALS L P 108.75 AP - 00282993 5/20/2009 SHERIFFS COURT SERVICES 109.61 AP - 00282994 5/20/2009 SHERIFFS COURT SERVICES 388.91 AP - 00282995 5/20/2009 SHERIFFS COURT SERVICES 65.00 AP - 00282996 5/20/2009 SHERIFFS COURT SERVICES 150.00 AP - 00282997 5/20/2009 SHERIFFS COURT SERVICES 20.00 AP - 00282998 5/20/2009 SHERIFFS COURT SERVICES 150.00 AP - 00283000 5/20/2009 SILIPIGNO, LAURIE 64.80 AP - 00283002 5/20/2009 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 9.53 AP - 00283003 5/20/2009 SOUTH BAY FOUNDRY INC 262.20 AP - 00283007 5/20/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 20.60 AP - 00283007 5/20/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 20.07 AP - 00283007 5/20/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 18.83 AP - 00283007 5/20/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 64.07 AP - 00283007 5/20/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 46.33 AP - 00283007 5/20/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 18.56 AP - 00283007 5/20/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 58.69 AP - 00283007 5/20/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 39.4 ] AP - 00283007 5/20/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 19.80 AP - 00283007 5/20/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 19.20 AP - 00283007 5/20/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 58.85 AP - 00283007 5/20/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 76.71 AP - 00283007 5/20/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 28.02 AP - 00283007 5/20/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 21.04 AP - 00283007 5/20/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 20.00 AP - 00283007 5/20/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 162.86 AP - 00283007 5/20/2009 SOUTHER' CALIFORNIA EDISON 30.92 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 29 Current Date: 05/27/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAI T_RC - CK Aeenda Check Reeister Portrait Layout Time: 11:26:2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P63 Agenda Check Reeister 8/13/2009 through 8/26/2009 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00283007 8/20/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 19.80 AP - 00283007 8/20/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 19.84 AP - 00283007 8/20/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 19.20 AP - 00283007 8/20/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 18.56 AP - 00283007 8;20/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 85.85 AP - 00283007 5/20/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 19.84 AP - 00283007 8/20/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 19.32 AP - 00283007 8/20/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 135.14 AP - 00283007 8/20/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 72.44 AP - 00283007 8/20/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 19.47 AP - 00283007 8/20/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 29.87 AP - 00283007 5/20/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 764.27 AP - 00283007 8/20/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 77.41 AP - 00283007 5/20/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 20.07 AP - 00283007 5/20/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 20.00 AP - 00283007 8/20/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 20.60 AP - 00283007 8/20/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 1,331.71 AP - 00283007 8/20/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.37 AP - 00283007 8/20/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON S 1.03 AP - 00283007 8/20/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 39.34 AP - 00283007 8/20/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 19.20 AP - 00283007 8/20/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 48.43 AP - 00283007 8/20/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 42.98 AP - 00283007 8/20/2009 SOUTHER\' CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.36 AP - 00283007 5/20/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 19.20 AP - 00283007 8/20/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 21.14 AP - 00283007 5/20/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 44.22 AP - 00283007 8/20/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.08 AP - 00283007 5/20/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.40 AP - 00283007 8/20/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 18.56 AP - 00283007 8/20/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON ] 8.56 AP - 00283007 5/20/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 189.62 AP - 00283007 8/20/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 216.24 AP - 00283007 5/20/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 76.88 AP - 00283007 8/20/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 40.01 AP - 00283007 8/20/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 19.84 AP - 00283007 8/20/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 20.00 AP - 00283007 5/20/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON S 1.43 AP - 00283007 5/20/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 65.36 AP - 00283007 5/20/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON ] 0.49 AP - 00283007 8/20/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFOINIA EDISON 19.84 AP - 00283007 8/20/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 20.23 AP - 00283007 8/20/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 39.81 AP - 00283007 5/20/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.86 AP - 00283007 5/20/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 200.78 AP - 00283007 8/20/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 39.21 AP - 00283007 5/20/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.01 AP - 00283007 5/20/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 19.20 AP - 00283007 5/20/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 19.43 AP - 00283007 8/20/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 19.20 AP - 00283007 5/20/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 19.20 AP - 00283007 8/20/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 19.84 AP - 00283007 5/20/2009 SOUTHER.') CALIFORNIA EDISON 50.25 AP - 00283007 8/20/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 342.29 _ tiser: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 30 Current Date: 05/27/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_R EG_PORTRAI T_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Pornait Layoui Timc: 11:26:2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P64 AEenda Check Register 5/13/2009 through 5/26/2009 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amoun[ AP - 00283007 5/20/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 599.04 AP - 00283007 5/20/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 561.41 AP - 00283007 5/20/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 19.57 AP - 00283007 5/20/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 18.91 AP - 00253007 520/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 18.19 AP - 00283007 5/20/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.22 AP - 00283007 5/20/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 41.07 AP - 00283007 520/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 85.97 AP - 00283007 5/20/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 26.32 AP - 00283007 5/20/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.37 AP - 00283007 5/20/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 18.56 AP - 00283007 5/20/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 4.05 AP - 00283007 5/20/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 18.56 AP - 00283007 5/20/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 71.52 AP - 00283007 5/20/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 108.61 AP - 00283007 5/20/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 925.37 AP - 00283007 5/20/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 19.20 AP - 00283007 5/20/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 112.61 AP - 00283007 5/20/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 493.16 AP - 00283007 5/20/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 152.95 AP - 00283007 5/20/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 19.80 AP - 00283007 5/20/2009 SOUTHERN' CALIFORNIA EDISON 127.14 AP - 00283007 5/20/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 19.84 AP - 00283007 5/20/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 81.01 AP - 00283007 5/20/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 19.20 AP - 00283007 5/20/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 55.48 AP - 00283007 5/20/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 49.93 AP - 00283007 5/20/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 19.20 AP - 00283007 5/20/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 19.96 AP - 00283007 5/20/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 88.26 AP - 00283007 5/20/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 124.05 AP - 00283007 5/20/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 80.30 AP - 00283007 5/20/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 19.20 AP - 00283007 5/20/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 68.24 AP - 00283007 5/20/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 102.32 AP - 00283007 5/20/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 19.43 AP - 00283007 5/20/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 19.84 AP - 00283007 5/20/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 19.20 AP - 00283007 5/20/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 19.80 AP - 00283007 5/20/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 19.20 AP - 00283007 5/20/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 52.97 AP - 00283007 5/20/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 65.10 AP - 00283007 Si20/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 1920 AP - 00283007 5/20/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 20.07 AP - 00283007 5/20/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 21.24 AP - 00283007 5!20/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON ] 920 AP - 00283007 5/20/2009 SOUTHERA' CALIFORNIA ED[SON 21.03 AP - 00283008 5/20/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 28,481.07 AP - 00283008 5/20/2009 SOUTHERN' CALIFORNIA EDISON ] 5,178.29 AP - 00283008 5/20/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 4,702.19 AP - 00283008 5/20/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 21.863.17 AP - 00283008 5/20/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 29.56 AP - 00283008 5/20/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 48.23 AP - 00283008 5/20/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 11,084.43 _ User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 31 Current Date: 05/27/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_R EG_PORTRAI T_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 11:26:2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P65 Agenda Check Resister 8/13/2009 through 8/26/2009 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amoun[ AP - 00283008 8/20/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 4,586.60 AP - 00283008 8/20/2009 SOUTHERA` CALIFORNIA EDISON 126.38 AP - 00283008 8/20/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 42.79 AP - 00283008 8/20/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13,033.06 AP - 00283008 5/20/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 36.70 AP - 00283008 8/20/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 5,284.46 AP - 00283008 8/20/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 2,666.11 AP - 00283008 8/20/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 35.83 AP - 00283008 8/20/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12,865.96 AP - 00283008 8/20/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 9,819.67 AP - 00283008 8/20/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 48,642.88 AP - 00283008 8/20/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 0.00 AP - 00283009 5/20/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 786.17 AP - 00283010 8/20/2009 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 101.19 AP - 00283011 8/20/2009 SOUTHLAND SPORTS OFFICIALS 138.00 AP - 00283012 5/20/2009 SPECIALIZED BUILDER'S HARDWARE INC 664.95 AP - 00283012 8/20/2009 SPECIALIZED BUILDER'S HARDWARE INC 364.20 AP - 00283012 5/20/2009 SPECIALIZED BUILDER'S HARDWARE INC 504.27 AP - 002830]2 8/20/2009 SPECIALIZED BUILDER'S HARDWARE INC 798.43 AP - 00283012 8/20/2009 SPECIALIZED BUILDER'S HARDWARE INC 1,678.19 AP-00283013 8/20/2009 SPOONFACTORY 1,6]0.00 AP - 00283013 8/20/2009 SPOONFACTORY 108.00 AP - 00283013 8/20/2009 SPOONFACTORY 385.00 AP - 00233013 8/20/2009 SPOONFACTORY 350.00 AP - 00283014 5/20/2009 STANLEY CONVERGENT SECURITY SOLUTION 175.00 AP - 00283015 8/20/2009 STEELWORKERS OLDTIMERS FOUNDATION 689.17 AP - 00283016 8/20/2009 STERICYCLE INC 821.53 AP - 00283017 5/20/2009 STEVE JULIUS CONSTRUCTION 10,000.00 AP - 00283018 5/20/2009 STOFA, JOSEPH 12.00 AP - 00283019 5/20/2009 STRESS LESS EXPRESS LLC 108.00 AP - 00283020 5/20/2009 SUNRISE FORD 298.52 AP - 00283020 5/20/2009 SUNRISE FORD 261.00 AP - 0028302 t 5/20/2009 SWANK MOTION PICTURES INC 321.00 AP - 00283022 8/20/2009 TANNER RECOGNITION COMPANY, O C 329.48 AP - 00283023 8/20/2009 TARGET SPECIALTY PRODUCTS 101.02 AP - 00283025 8/20/2009 THEATRE COMPANY, THE 65.00 AP - 00283026 8/20/2009 THEODORE ROBINS FORD INC 35,690.04 AP - 00283026 8/20/2009 THEODORE ROBINS FORD INC 53,647.66 AP - 00283027 8/20/2009 THEWES, KRISTINE 630.00 AP - 00283028 8/20/2009 TOOLS R US INC 35.30 AP - 00283028 8/20/2009 TOOLS R US INC 831.96 AP - 00283029 8/20/2009 TRAFFIC OPERATIONS INC 4,521.41 AP - 00283029 5/20/2009 TRAFFIC OPERATIONS INC 1,083.13 AP - 00283029 8/20/2009 TRAFFIC OPERATIONS INC 8,384.93 AP - 00283030 8/20/2009 TRAFFIC SPECIALTIES INC 808.41 AP - 00283031 8/20/2009 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 31,153.87 AP - 00283031 8/20/2009 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 78,427.04 AP - 00283031 8/20/2009 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 496.54 AP - 00283031 8/20/2009 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 21,521.30 AP - 00283031 8/20/2009 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 4,811.68 AP - 00283031 8/20/2009 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 87.34 AP - 00283031 8/20/2009 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 2,556.30 AP - 00283031 8/20/2009 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 16,828.97 AP - 00283031 8/20/2009 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 25,027.79 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 32 Current Date: 08/27/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_ REG_PORTRAI T_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 11:26:2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P66 Asenda Check Resister 5/13/2009 through 5/26/2009 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amoun[ AP - 00283031 5/20/2009 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 1,487.22 AP - 00283031 5/20/2009 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 2,788.88 AP - 00283031 5/20/2009 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 12,703.42 AP - 00283031 5/20/2009 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 4,183.37 AP - 00283031 5/20/2009 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 2,683.68 AP - 00283031 5/20/2009 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 1,488.55 AP - 00283031 5/20/2009 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 1,283.20 AP - 00283031 5/20/2009 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 209.42 AP - 00283031 5/20/2009 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 1,124.50 AP - 00283031 5/20/2009 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 129.75 AP - 00283031 5/20/2009 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 175.00 AP - 00283031 5/20/2009 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 778.50 AP - 00283031 5/20/2009 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 2,520.00 AP - 00283031 5/20/2009 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 1,038.00 AP - 00283031 5/20/2009 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 1,038.00 AP - 00283031 5/20/2009 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 225.00 AP - 00283032 5/20/2009 UNDERGROUND SVC ALERT OF SO CAL 136.50 AP - 00283033 5/20/2009 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 1,263.94 AP - 00283033 5/20/2009 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 226.11 AP - 00283033 5/20/2009 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 53.12 AP - 00283034 5/20/2009 UNIQUE MANAGEMENT SERVICES INC 829.23 AP - 00283035 5/20/2009 UNITED PACIFIC SERVICES INC 4,140.00 AP - 00283036 5/20/2009 UNITED WAY 11.00 AP - 00283036 5/20/2009 UNITED WAY 251.82 AP - 00283037 5/20/2009 UPS 29.52 AP - 00283038 5/20/2009 URBAN CROSSROADS INC 2,800.00 AP - 00283039 5/20/2009 UTI 575.98 AP - 00283039 5/20/2009 UTI 387.80 AP - 00283040 5/20/2009 V T ELECTRIC INC 989.65 AP - 00283040 5/20/2009 V T ELECTRIC INC -98.97 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZODI 46.23 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 37.82 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 46.25 AP-0028305] 5/20/2009 VERIZON 46.23 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 3782 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 38.61 AP - 00283051 S/20/2009 VERIZON 37.82 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 37.82 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 3782 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 42.81 AP-0028305] 5/20/2009 VERIZON 46.23 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 0.00 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 4623 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 37.82 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 3782 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 37.82 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 31.78 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 37.82 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 31.78 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 37.82 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 37.82 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 3782 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 37.82 AP - 002 83051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 37.82 _ __ _ User: VLOPEZ -Veron ica Lopez Page: 33 Current Date: 05/27/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAI T_RC - CK: Agenda Check Reeister Pomait Layout Time: 11:26:2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P67 Agenda Check Resister 5/13/2009 through 5/26/2009 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 37.82 AP - 00283051 520/2009 VERIZON 0.00 AP-0028305] 5/20/2009 VERIZON 62.81 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 V ERIZON 73.93 AP - 00283051 5;20/2009 VERIZON 0.00 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 37.82 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 31.78 AP - 00283051 520/2009 VERIZON 37.82 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 31.78 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 31.78 AP - 00283051 Si20/2009 VERIZON 0.00 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 43.02 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 43.02 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 V ERIZON 43.02 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 43.02 AP - 0028305 ] 5/20/2009 VERIZON 43.02 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 38.94 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 62.81 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 85.08 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 V ERIZON 51.22 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 37.82 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 37.82 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 37.82 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 72.33 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 37.82 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 37.82 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 50.41 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 52.85 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 64.85 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 62.81 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 62.81 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 73.81 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 37.82 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 0.00 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 0.00 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 62.81 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 0.00 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 0.00 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 62.81 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 64.11 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 62.93 AP - 00283051 5/20'2009 VERIZON 62.81 AP-0028305] 520/2009 VERIZON 74.32 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 37.82 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 50.41 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 42.81 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 50.41 AP - 00283051 520/2009 VERIZON 81.82 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 45.51 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 44.26 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 38.80 AP - 00283051 5202009 VERIZON 44.53 AP - 00283051 5!20/2009 VERIZON 41.12 AP - 00283051 5!20/2009 VERIZON 38.29 user: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Pagc: 34 Current Date: 05/27/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_ REG_PORTRAI T_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Pomait Layout Time: 11:26:2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P68 Agenda Check Register 5/13/2009 through S/26/2009 Check No. Check Dale Vendor Name Amount AP-00283051 520/2009 VERIZON 37.82 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 41.11 AP - 00283051 S/20/2009 VERIZON 40.90 AP - 00283051 S/20/2009 VERIZON 40.90 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 57.41 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VER[ZON 53.21 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 65.85 AP - 00283051 5:'20/2009 VERIZON 41.41 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 44.51 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 41.15 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 40.90 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 41.92 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 43.95 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 40.90 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 41.41 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 40.90 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 49.05 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 43.69 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 38.75 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 34.86 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 48.94 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 46.89 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 48.94 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 48.19 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 55.00 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 46.89 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 50.21 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 43.81 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 V ERIZON 43.81 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 43.81 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 43.81 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 43.81 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 43.81 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 42.16 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 4242 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 70.82 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 46.89 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 34.86 AP - 00283051 5!20/2009 VERIZON 34.86 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 3782 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 34.33 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 61.15 AP-002830>1 5/20/2009 VERIZON 40.90 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 49.53 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 46.41 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 76.15 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 40.90 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 3782 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 40.90 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 40.90 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 40.90 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 4928 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 44.15 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 38.22 _ User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 35 Current Date: 05/27/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAI T_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 11:26:2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P69 Agenda Check Register 5/13/2009 through 5/26/2009 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VEWZON 46.12 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 36.92 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 36.92 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 38.18 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 36.92 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 36.92 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 3822 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 44.26 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 36.92 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 38.04 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 36.92 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 36.92 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 49.27 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 40.09 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 36.92 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 37.82 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 37.82 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 0.00 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 0.07 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 20.06 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 3782 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 37.82 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 64.84 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 37.82 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 3782 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 3782 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 50.41 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 20.00 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 20.00 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 44.11 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 47.53 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON G5.46 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 38.08 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 57.62 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 50.43 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 50.41 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON -18.25 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 37.82 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 0.00 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 0.00 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 0.00 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 31.78 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 0.00 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 0.00 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 37.82 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 50.41 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 0.00 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 5122 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 3782 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 50.41 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 50.41 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 0.00 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 42.81 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 0.00 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 36 Current Date: 05/27/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 1126:2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P7!) Aeenda Check Register S/13/2009 through 5/26/2009 Check No. Check Date Vendor :Name Amount AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 42.93 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 40.45 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 31.78 AP - 00283051 S/20/2009 VERIZON 48.08 AP - 00283051 5,'20/2009 VERIZON 3782 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 0.00 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 0.00 AP - 0028305 t 5/20/2009 VERIZON 39.08 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 3782 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 3782 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 3782 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 37.82 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 0.00 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 42.81 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 0.00 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 35.61 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 38.33 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 3782 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 3752 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 55.47 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 3752 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 0.00 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 3752 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 0.00 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 0.00 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 37.52 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 0.00 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 42.15 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 0.00 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 39.12 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 0.00 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 0.00 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 0.00 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 31.75 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 0.00 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 0.00 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 38.17 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 0.00 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 106.99 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 89.52 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 46.16 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 41.92 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 62.93 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 37.52 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 49.81 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 37.52 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 31.75 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 31.82 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 50.41 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 63.84 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 38.33 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 37.52 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 40.03 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 65.38 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 37 Current Date: 05/27/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAI T_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: I ]:26:2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 5/13/2009 through 5/26/2009 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 31.78 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 0.00 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 62.81 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 67.54 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 42.96 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 72.01 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 48.81 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 43.81 AP-00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 50.4] AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 V ERIZON 39.84 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 37.82 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 50.41 AP - 00283051 5/20/2009 VERIZON 63.01 AP - 00283052 5/20/2009 VILLAGE NURSERIES WHOLESALE LLC 373.78 AP - 00283052 5/20/2009 VILLAGE NURSEKIES WHOLESALE LLC 424.17 AP - 00283053 5/20/2009 VISTA PAINT 24.18 AP - 00283053 5/20/2009 VISTA PAINT 24.18 AP - 00283053 5/20/2009 VISTA PAINT 890.68 AP - 00283053 5/20/2009 VISTA PAINT 24.18 AP - 00283053 5/20/2009 VISTA PAINT 371.65 AP - 00283053 5/20/2009 VISTA PAINT 885.64 AP - 00283054 5/20/2009 VOLVO CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT 379.39 AP - 00283055 5/20/2009 VULCAN MATERIALS COMPANY 99.84 AP - 00283055 5/20/2009 WLCAN MATERIALS COMPANY 66.49 AP - 00283057 5/20/2009 WATERS, JIM 50.00 AP - 00283058 5/20/2009 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 92.15 AP - 00283058 5/20/2009 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 292.66 AP - 00283060 5/20/2009 WEST PAYMENT CENTER 225.16 AP - 00283061 5/20/2009 WEST SANITATION SERVICES INC 370.10 AP - 00283062 5/20/2009 WESTERN ELECTRICITY COORDINATING COUi 1,510.22 AP - 00283063 5/20/2009 WILSON AND BELL 80.03 AP - 00283064 5/20/2009 YOUNG, MISTY 1,300.00 Total for Check ID AP: 2,124,782.10 EP - 00000404 5/13/2009 MICHAEL, L. DENNIS 89.65 EP - 00000405 5/13/2009 PILOT POWER GROUP INC 70,388.71 EP - 00000406 5/13/2009 SHELL ENERGY NORTH AMERICA 4,500.00 EP - 00000406 5/13/2009 SHELL ENERGY NORTH AMERICA 165,537.15 EP - 00000407 5/13/2009 VERNON, CITY OF 174,990.00 EP - 00000421 5/20/2009 FORTISTAR METHANE GROUP LLC 97,455.99 EP - 00000421 5/20/2009 FORTISTAR METHANE GROUP LLC 85,728.54 Total for Check ID EP: 598,690.04 Total for Entity: 2,723,472.14 P71 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 38 Current Date: 05/27/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Pomait Layout Timc: 11:26:2 P72 STAFF REPORT - ADDIINISTR.~ITI\'E SERVICES DEP~1RTIvfENT RANCHO Date: June 3, 2009 C,UCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager From: John Gillison, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Servi~ By: Manuel E. Pilonieta, Inform Services Manager Keri Hinojos, Senior Buyef~ Subject: APPROVAL TO AWAR~D`~THE PURCHASE OF ONE (1) LOT OF IBM COMPUTER SERVER EQUIPMENT WITH MAINTENANCE FROM IBM CORPORATION, UTILIZING WESTERN STATES CONTRACTING ALLIANCE (WSCA) CONTRACT NUMBER A63311, IN THE TOTAL AMOUNT OF $61,949 TO BE FUNDED AS FOLLOWS: $42,663 FROM ACCOUNT 1714001-5215 (COMPUTER EQUIPMENT/TECHNICAL REPLACEMENT FUND-08~M/COMPUTER EQUIPMENT), $4,959 FROM 1714001-5300 (CONTRACT SERVICES), AND $14,327 FROM ACCOUNT 1714001-5605 (CAPITAL OUTLAY-COMPUTER EQUIPMENT) RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council approve the award of a contract to purchase one (1) lot of IBM computer server equipment with maintenance from IBM Corporation to purchase IBM Servers for the City, utilizing the Western States Contracting Alliance (WSCA) contract number A63307, in the total amount of $61,949 to be funded as follows: $42,663 from account 1714001-5215 (Computer Equipment/Technical Replacement Fund - O&M/Computer Equipment), $4,959 from 1714001-5300 (Contract Services), and $14,327 from account 1714001-5605 (Capital Outlay- Computer Equipment). BACKGROUND The Information Services Division (ISD) oversees the management of central computer servers for the City. Some of the City's servers are past their recommended life span and require replacement. This award replaces these aged servers with new systems. The I.S. Division provided specifications to Purchasing which were then sent directly to IBM Corporation for a request for quote. IBM responded with manufacturer direct pricing utilizing the Western States Contracting Alliance (WSCA) number A63311. In reviewing the response, the I.S. and Purchasing Divisions have determined that utilizing the WSCA contract is the most advantageous method of procurement. STAFF REPORT E?~GII~EERING DEPARTME\T Date: June 3, 2009 To: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager From: Mark A. Steuer, Director of Engineering Services/ City Engineer By: Linda Ceballos, Environmental Programs Manager P73 RANCHO ~UCAMONGA Subject: RESOLUTION APPROVING THE SUBMITTAL OF THE FUNDING REQUEST TO THE DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION, DIVISION OF RECYCLING FOR BEVERAGE CONTAINER RECYCLING AND LITTER REDUCTION ACTIVITIES RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the resolution approving submittal of the Funding Request to the Department of Conservation, Division of Recycling. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The California Beverage Container Recycling and Litter Reduction Act provides funding to local governments for specified beverage container recycling and litter reduction activities that encourage communities to recycle beverage containers. The City of Rancho Cucamonga has received block grant funding since 2000. Grant funds have been utilized to implement multi-family recycling programs, implement and promote school recycling, conduct multi-media promotion, and implement recycling opportunities at city facilities. The 2009/10 Funding Request, if approved, will provide $45,261 to implement and promote beverage container recycling activities in the City. The grant term is from July 1, 2009, through June 30, 2010. There are no matching funds required by the City. Proposed use of funds include continued expansion of beverage container recycling opportunities at City facilities; expansion of commercial and multi-family recycling programs; continued support of school recycling programs; community outreach; and multi-media promotion. Respectfully submitted, /~''L er Director of Engineering Services/ City Engineer MS: LC/rl c P74 RESOLUTION NO. ~9'O9~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE SUBMITTAL OF THE FUNDING REQUEST TO THE DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION, DIVISION OF RECYCLING FOR BEVERAGE CONTAINER RECYCLING AND LITTER REDUCTION ACTIVITIES. WHEREAS, the people of the State of California have enacted the California Beverage Container Recycling and Litter Reduction Act that provides funds to cities and counties for beverage container recycling and litter cleanup activities; and WHEREAS, the California Department of Conservation, Division of Recycling has been delegated the responsibility for the administration of the program within the State, setting up necessary procedures for cities and counties or their designees under the program; and WHEREAS, per Section 14581 (a)(4)(e) of the Beverage Container Recycling and Litter Reduction Act, the City of Rancho Cucamonga, as the eligible participant, must submit the Funding Request Form by the due date and time in order to be considered to receive funds from the Department of Conservation, Division of Recycling; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA authorizes the submittal of the Funding Request to the California Department of Conservation, Division of Recycling. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Manager, or his/her designee, is hereby authorized and empowered to execute in the name of the City of Rancho Cucamonga all necessary applications, contracts, payment requests, agreements and amendments hereto for the purposes of securing grant funds and to implement and carry out the purposes specified in the grant application. P75 StaffReport DATE: June 03, 2009 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: John R. Gillison, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services BY: Ingrid Y. Bruce, GIS/Special Districts Manager SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION TO APPROVE THE RESOLUTIONS TO ACCEPT THE PRELIMINARY ENGINEER'S REPORT AND ANNOUNCING THE CITY COUNCIL'S INTENTION TO COLLECT ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS WITHIN STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS NO'S. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 AND 8 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2009/10. NO INCREASE OF ASSESSMENT RATE IS PROPOSED. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council approve the Resolutions accepting the Engineer's Reports and setting the Public Hearing for June 17, 2009, to levy the annual assessments for Street Lighting Maintenance District No's. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8. There is no increase to the current rates in these districts for Fiscal Year 2009/2010. The Engineer's Reports are on file in the City Clerk's Office. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: The City of Rancho Cucamonga has eight Street Light Maintenance Districts that provide street light coverage throughout the general city and planned communities. Each yeaz the assessments received are earmazked for the maintenance and operation of street lights, traffic signals and appurtenant facilities related thereto. Said maintenance and operation includes the cost and supervision of street lighting maintenance (including repair removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement providing for illumination of the subject area) in connection with said Districts. The City utilizes prior year carryovers along with current year revenues to meet the districts annual expenses. The City has determined, as stated in the Street Light Maintenance Districts FY 2009/2010 Engineer's Reports that the assessment rates shall remain unchanged from the previous FY 2008/2009 rates. The assessment rate and district description for each Street Light Maintenance District is as follows: CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS June 03, 2009 Page 2 Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 assessments pay for energy and maintenance for streetlights on arterial streets. The current assessment rate is $17.77 per single-family residence. The commercial rate is $35.54/acre. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 assessments pay for energy and maintenance for streetlights on residential streets. The current assessment rate is $39.97 per single-family residence. The commercial rate is $79.94/acre. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3 assessments pay for energy and maintenance for streetlights within the Victoria Planned Community. The current assessment rate is $47.15 per single-family residence. The commercial rate is $94.30/acre. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 4 assessments pay for energy and maintenance for streetlights within the Terra Vista Planned Community. The current assessment rate is $28.96 per single-family residence, and the multi-family rate is $14.48 per dwelling unit the commercial rate is $7.92/acre. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 5 assessments pay for energy and maintenance for streetlights within the Caryn Planned Community. The current assessment rate is $34.60 per single-family residence. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 assessments pay for energy and maintenance for streetlights within the commercial and industrial area of the City. The current assessment rate is $51.40 per acre for commercial property. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 7 assessments pay for energy and maintenance for streetlights within the Etiwanda Highlands Community. The current assessment rate is $33.32 per single-family residence. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 8 assessments pay for energy and maintenance for streetlights in South Etiwanda. The current assessment rate is $193.7 per single-family residence. P76 Attachments: Resolutions Engineer's Reports P77 RESOLUTION NO. D9- ~9 L A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, FOR APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S ANNUAL REPORTS FOR STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 AND 8 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2009/10 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby resolve that: WHEREAS, pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 (the "Act"), the City Engineer is required to make and file with the City Clerk of said City an annual report ("Report") in writing for which assessments are to be levied and collected to pay the costs of the maintenance and/or improvement of said Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 (the "Districts"); and WHEREAS, the City Engineer has made and filed with the Ciry Clerk of said City Reports in writing as called for pursuant to said Act, which have been presented to this Council for consideration; and WHEREAS, said City Council has duly considered said Reports and each and every part thereof; and finds that each and every part of said Reports aze sufficient, and that said Reports, should not be modified in any respect. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council ofthe City ofRancho Cucamonga does hereby order as follows: That the Engineer's Estimate of the itemized costs and expenses of said work and of the incidental expenses in connection therewith, contained in said Reports be hereby approved and confirmed. 2. That the diagrams showing the Districts referred to and described in said Reports, and the boundaries ofthe subdivisions of land within said Districts are hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed. That the proposed assessments upon the subdivisions of land in said Districts in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by said subdivision, respectively, from said work and of the incidental expenses thereof, as contained in said Reports are hereby approved and confirmed. 4. That said Reports shall stand as the City Engineer's Annual Reports for Fiscal Year 2009/10 for the subsequent proceedings. P78 RESOLUTION NO. D9- ~`~~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 AND 8 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2009/10 PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972; AND ANNOUNCING A TIME AND PLACE FOR A PUBLIC HEARING THEREON WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, pursuant to the provisions ofthe Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, does resolve as follows: Description of Work SECTION 1: That the public interest and convenience require and it is the intention of this City Council to levy and collect assessments within Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 (the "Districts") for Fiscal Year 2009/10 for the maintenance and operation of street lights, traffic signals and appurtenant facilities related thereto. Said maintenance and operation includes the cost and supervision of street lighting maintenance (including repair removal or replacement of all or any part of a~~y improvement providing for illumination ofthe subject area) in connection with said Districts. A description of the specific improvements to be maintained within each District is attached hereto as Exhibit A. Location of Work SECTION 2: The foregoing described work is to be located within the roadway rights-of--way and easements enumerated in the reports of the City Engineer and described on maps that are on file in the City Clerk's office, entitled "Assessment Diagram Street Lighting Maintenance DistrictNos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8." Description of Assessment District SECTION 3: That the contemplated work, in the opinion of said City Council, is of more than local or general public benefit, and said City Council hereby makes the expense of the work chargeable upon the Districts, which said Districts are assessed to pay the costs and expenses thereof, and which Districts are described as follows: All that certain territory of the City of Rancho Cucamonga included within the exterior boundary lines shown upon that certain "Map of Street Lighting Maintenance District No. I ", "Map of Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2", "Map of Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3", "Map of Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 4", "Map of Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 5", "Map of Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6", "Map of Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 7" and "Map of Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 8" indicating by said boundary lines the extent of the territory included within each District Facsimiles of said maps are attached hereto as Exhibit B. The actual maps P79 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS Mazch 19, 2008 Page 2 are on file in the office of the City Clerk of said City. Reference is hereby made to said maps for further, full and more particular description of said Districts, and the maps so on file shall govern for all details as to the extent of said Districts. Report of Engineer SECTION 4: The City Council of said City by Resolution No. approved the reports of the City Engineer, which Reports indicate the amount of the proposed assessments, the District boundazies, any assessment zones therein, and the method of assessment. The Reports, titled "Annual Engineer's Report", aze on file in the office of the City Clerk of said City. Reference to said Reports is hereby made for all particulars for the amount and extent of the assessments and for the extent of the work. A listing of the assessment rate and method of apportionment for each District is attached hereto as Exhibit C. Please refer to the Reports for a full and complete description of the assessment rate and method of apportionment within each District. Time and Place of Heazing SECTION 5: Notice is hereby given that a Public Hearing is hereby scheduled in the Civic Center Council Chambers, 10500 Civic Center Drive, City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, 91730. WEDNESDAY, June 17, 2009. AT 7:00 P.M. Any and all persons may appear and show cause why said maintenance and service for the existing improvements and the proposed improvements should not be done or carried out or why assessments should not be levied and collected for Fiscal Year 2009/10. Landscaping and Lightin¢ Act of 1972 SECTION 6: All the work herein proposed shall be done and carried through in pursuance of an act of the legislature of the State of California designated as the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Part 2 of Division 1 ~ of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California. Publication of Resolution of Intention SECTION 7: Published notice shall be made pursuant to Section 6061 ofthe Government Code. The Mayor shall sign this Resolution and the City Clerk shall attest to the same, and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published once, at least 10 days before the date set for the hearing in the Inland Vallev Daily Bulletin, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontazio, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. P80 APPENDIX A The following pages contain descriptions ofthe improvements to be maintained within each ofthe eleven Districts. Please refer to the annual reports of the City Engineer (the "Reports") for a full and complete description of the maintenance items within each District. STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 Maintenance Items: The installation maintenance ofstreet lights and traffic signals on arterial streets throughout the City. STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 Maintenance Items: The installation/maintenance ofstreet lights and traffic signals on local streets. generally west of Haven Avenue. STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0.3 Maintenance Items: The installation/maintenance ofstreet lights and traffic signals located within the Victoria Planned Community. STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.4 Maintenance Items: The installation/maintenance ofstreet lights and traffic signals located within the Terra Vista Planned Community. STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.S Maintenance Items: The installation/maintenance ofstreet lights and traffic signals located within the Caryn Planned Community. P81 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.6 Maintenance Items: The installation/maintenance of street lights and traffic signals located on commercial and industrial streets throughout the City but that are not within an existing local maintenance district. This azea is located generally south of Foothill Boulevard. STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 7 Maintenance Items: The installation maintenance of street lights and traffic signals on local streets within the azea of the City known as "North Etiwanda". This area is located generally east of Day Creek Channel and north of Highland Avenue. STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 8 Maintenance Items: The installation/maintenance of street lights and traffic signals on local streets within the azea of the City known as "South Etiwanda". This azea is located generally east of Etiwanda Avenue, north of Foothill Boulevazd and south of Highland Avenue. P82 APPENDIX B The following pages contain the boundary maps for each of the eight Districts. P83 ~ ~~ V 'i N .y Y o 0 ~ ~ U cJa ~n ~ V ~ ~ ~ r'x o ~ ~ .~ ~ ~ J o ~ ~ ~ N ^ W N O ~? `1r1 ~ O J [D ~ m w 3 o ~° ~ ny lSe~ u~ ~~ ® L_ ~ J ny epuenni~~ y.+ i ny ~alsay~o~ ny ~a~sayoo~ ny ua~illiW nd ua~i!II!W ny uaneH ny uaneH ny esow~aH ny esow~aH ny plegiyo~y ny Pleq!yo~b' ~ ny uewllaH ny uewllaH ~ L L ,~ ny p~e~(au in aS ueilawe~ ~~:op~~rg=~~ F~~'a;n~£`s ~~ °~%e 5a~~~B=: ~y~ ~ go% ° ag`s ~ +~ F ~ ~ ^F LL _ ny ano~~ =~g~~F_s=gay F ~ ~ Y C m ~ ~ : a` 9 ~EI3 S° E yea ' ~ J - ~ w ~€•8 ~ a.E~~F~¢g~gg ~ O ~ O o0 `~s ~a3,:Eg 'O ' ~ ~ O Q g ~Va ~s~r~b~~Q ~. ~ ~ m LL €5sx.';8a;~p ~ c ~ti~~ wT~ • -~ ~ i~ 6~ea~~~F~ieg ~ c~ gegy^~~£~Q~a _~ < __ m ~~~~= ag as ~~~+tE~2a"a` 65 e~'e V.EC`tl N=% ESF- P84 N *~ 'i ~~ J N ~ ~ Q Q C U ~ ~ V ~ ~ d ~~~~ .~ 0 ~ ~ J o .. _.. _.. _.._ ~ N ~ ~r C_ O ;% ~ J CO ~ ~ ~ ~ _ j m o O ~i Q ~ ~ nd ~Se3 v~ 1 ~ ~ ® J ~ ny epuenn!~3 ny epueM!~~ 'iv ~ ~e ~aa~~ e4 ~ ~.._.._.._.._.._. ._..-i ~ ny ~a~sa yooa ny ~a~sayoo~ r"- ny ua~{!IIiW i .._.._.._.._. i ny ua~l!II!W ny uaneH ny uaneH ny esowaaH ny esow~aH nd Pleq!yo~y ny pleq!yo~y ~ ny uewllaH ny uewllaH ~ L_ ~ n y p~e~au !n ~S ue!lawe~ o~~EAVe~gA-- g°+~s ~:~£~s ~a °sYeg~ a•b ~ d 4~~ y E=5 C afi c~iFq`o°~¢0 Q °~_ ~ }~ ~ ''_/^~ _ ryM~ /~_// ny ano~~ ~_/~ e~ Q ~_ _E _ _ ~ J = 3 i =~g~ y~gg~,~i ~ ~ L p ~ r nae~~ - ,:~ . ~_ T C 4~~aE ~Y~S a~g5F2§~-y~'i ° fn c (U m tF~a S~gS.~~ yu'~~~8¢~F ~~ : z~ =~°euC~s`Eii 8 ° ~ kXP: ~:f a aa:r P85 M ~ V ~ 'i ,y ~ o Q ~ ~ _ U ~ ~n ~ V ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~ 0 ~ J •~ ~ ~ o ~ .._ .._.._.._ ~ CV //••~ W ~ + ~ C _ O ~ ~• _ J ~ ~ _ ,~ ~ ~ L m O 1 ~ Q ~ ~ -••-••- i nb' ~se3 u~ .~ ~ ~ v ~ ~ ny epuennl~3 ® ny epuenni}3 ,~ ~e ~ aa~~ e4 ~ ..._. ._.._.._.._.._..- i ~ ny ~alsayoo~{ ny ~a~say~o~{ r"- i r.._.._.._.._. ny ua~{illiW i i ny ua~{!II!W i i ny uaneH • i ny uaneH i ny esowaaH i i ny esow~aH ntf Pleq!ya~`d . n`d Pleq!yo~b' i i ny ueuallaH i ~~ "~ ny uewllaH ~ s'' ~ t •~ L v , ~ ny p e~(auln lS ueilau~e~i ~m.o:r~•~:a~ Rya-~r~~~p•$ •• ••7 ~:afrae~~;~: . '• Y?- °i ~f 5 :$ p ~ ~ .~'• C m ~ (n 4 :6 ELE, g •_.._..~ ~...~' N ~ - 'aaC s _ .._.._ -p ~ (d Q Q een8or~cs. Q' C O] LL het Y~'n F ~:s`i N T _ $'°•_~ Ce~A~ C ~ s_ R C_ E t e~n ~ _ CO g°~~:~g4: P Z` ~ ~ f L°6°~ASob' €a°f s ~ .._ `/ y u. Eru-$. ec En-nyy RfifiSi~~~~~Z P86 !~' ~, ~r,+ 'i *r N ~~ .y ~ ~ 4 ~ ~ o ~ _ U ~ ~n ~ ~ V o ~ ~ ~•~ ~ ~ y J .~ ~ ~ o _ 1 .._.._.. ~ r~ w 1 c _ o ~ i J m ~ , ! ~ :~ 3 m o 0 1 ~ Q ~ ~ I _.._.._ ~ ny lSe3 in }~ .++ j ~ r ~ J i ny epuenn!~3 ~ ny epuenn!~~ 'ir j ~ i ~ ~8 ~aa~~ eQ ~ ~.._.._.._.._.._.._..- i ~ ny ~a~sayoo~ ny ~a~sayoo~ r"' i ~.._.._.._.._. ny ua~!!!!W i ny ua~!II!W i i i ny uaneH : i ny uaneH ny esow~aH i ny esow~aH i ny p!eq!y~~y . nb' Pleq!yo~b' i i ny UewllaH i ~~• '' ~ '~ ny uewllaH i < s ~ v I ~ ny pae~(au !/~ 3S ue!lawe~ 6E~~~~~~`_ i~.a€n~~E3- $ d ~ ~ • -Ys •~ _ ib ..~.._.._ _. ~ Y ° a$ig va~~ :: ~ ~ C ~ m o L.L Q j Eia8~~~9 E+"~. ~n,~ ,a~b;~B "6 ie '~ y ° ~2' 5 v~ C cv E s ti ~ $~g~ xR9~~-~ ~ P v =_ O ~ = m g~~~i~BO Sa~ gg Ygb 3E . %Ea~ ~~ Z.~ arc~EoZ~v~a~`d uga E!S e e° g = l i ° - U Pkr:~;~~~~a t P87 ~ ~~ V 'i N ^~ J ~ U ~ o ~ ~' J tir o ~ ~ ~ N o ~ ; O ~ ` C J m ~ O -_ t ' m p O L t _/~ _.. _.._ ~ n V ?Se~ VJ ' ® ~ L i ~ ~ i ny epuenn!~~ ny epuenni;~ J ~..~ i ~8 ~aa~ eo ,~ ti_.._.._.._.._. ._.._ ny ~a;sayoo~ ny ~a~sayoo~{ ,,.. 1 ny ua~{!II!W r._.._.._.._. i ny ua~{III!W i i i ny uaneH i i ny uaneH ny esow~aH ; ny esow~aH ny plegiyaay i nb' Pleq!yo~b' i ny uewllaH ~ _ ,.~ ~~ ~ ny ueuallaH j ' ° ~ ~ v i ny pae~(au!n m 4 °~` ~S ue!lauae~i ' m_ i.m~~P'4"E._Qf aP~=q$~£~P°~ - i .r..r~ r. A=- a~$qa M~'~.~~ - ~ ' ° ~ O r~ N cF +gaxpA 'O n_ _4 oV5"a ~ a ~ C m O LL Q $a:~S~aF3m~g . ~~ g ~ - (Q ~ ~° „v~Es~g &~g`~~4"~~~m 9 ? ~ P~ i cn fD o o g ~ ° e 6 Eb ~.a a `T` u ~ C ~ o e - J ~g~<agz°o~~~ P88 CO _m ~ ~~ V .~ w .y ~ co Q > ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ U ~ ~n ~ J ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ G .._.._.._.._ ~ N •w ~ ~_ _ o .~ i J CD ~ ~ ~ N ~ ~ ~ o m ` j ti Q ~i.+ ~ ny lse~ in v J ~ ny epuennia~ ~ ny epuenni~3 ~ j G1 ~ ~ ~ ~8 ~aa~~ ea ~ ~.._.._.._.._.._.._..-i ny ~a~sayoo~~ ny ~a~sayooa r"' i ~.._.._.._.._. ny ua~i!II!W ny ua~{ill!W i ny uaneH ny uaneH ny esou~~aH ny esow~aH ny plegiyo~y ny pleq!y~~t/ ny ueuallaH ~ ny uewllaH ~ L L_ ~ ny pae~auin lS ueilau~e~ s~~~'~~°~`~~ F`c~ '~'~f„Eggs ~ ~ x~8~fi~g~~e~~ ~ ~o;.~~ ~ ~ _ ,r ny anal t5°~f~y`ens~y~ ~ J - ~i L.. i~P~.g~gP~~,bd _ ~ ~ ~ ~ o Q ~~~8 ~s°~,~~ ~ T d~'Eb~~~:a~o~. x e vi t0 &g~~~~4~gg~x < m +~~~~nFg~:ga~ jZ ~~~~aE~ ~Y~F Eo~ .~ '~~ ~uFr~r~~~i~~ P89 C~ *~ V .~ L N .y ~ ti ~ o Q ~ ~ U ~ ~n V ~ o ~ ~ ~~~ 0 _ _~ ~ ~ .~ ~ ~ ~ ~ A ~ N ^` ~ Q "' W `;y C O _ J C~ ~ ^_ ~ ~ -_ L ~i m _ ~ ~ 11 Q ~ _.._.._ i ny lse~ in i L_ ® ~ J ny epueMl~~ `1.I ~ i • ny a a~sayoo~ ny ~a~sayoo~ r"- i r.._. ny ua~{!II!W i ._.._ .._. nt/ ua~l!II!W i i i ny uaneH • i i ny uaneH ny esoua~aH i i ny esou~~aH i ny uewllaH i ~,~• "~ ny uewllaH '' ~ r i ~ L V • ~ ny p~e~(au!n ~S ue!lawe~~ ~~~°A~o~~~o g~~6::°s F4 ~II EM ~• ~ L L i .. J •~' . - ~ g~~g~'g ~, fl z T- 55 4 ``^^ VJ !A ~ O ~ L Q E~ - a t~ €$~$7I~~~~q• ~ C m U_ ~~e_°°sF3;~`s ~ ~ T C ~~~~A rQ~od e`~'E'8'4~~p~c~ cn - c0 m 44cF~ !ra=s ~~g~@~' F ~i ~ ~ _ ~e ~ggag_a e E C! CV~ ~c o~ So oy u ~?t°E~~r ~~t . P90 ~O ~ ~1.+ V 'i N .= J CO O w ~ > Q _ U ~ ~n ~ o ~ V ~ ~ r•~ ti '~' ~ J o ~ .._.._.._.._ ~ N 1 ~ c 1 _ o r J CO ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ O 1 m ~ 1 LL Q .~ ~ _ _.._.._ j ny lSe3 (/~ '~ 1 } r/ ~ j L ~ ._.. J ~ ny epuennia~ ny epuenn!~~ 1 aa~ e ~ ~ ~ a 8 x ~ ~.._.._.._.._.._.._..- i ~ ny aa~sauoo~ ny ~a~sayoo~ r"' i ~.._.._.._.._. ny ua~!II!W j i ny ua~l!II!W i i ny uaneH • i ny uaneH i ny esoua~aH j i ny esouaaaH nt/ ple4luo~b' • ny plegl4a~H i uew a n "' ny ueuillaH ~ ~ ll H; y ` .. L • , j ny p e~(auin ~S ueilau~e~~ s~eyj?<==~'q ! ^~~~ yy P P. 6p ~! S ~ 6 e ~-~ 1 . ~••'• ••7 ~~'ia gQa ~~A-: t ~ • j ~~• ~ ~ ..~ • m ~ ~ ? a E~~Fe ds° ~ ~~ J E ~ E 1 .~ ~ .~ O o0 F ` ~ooa~a ~ ~ f0 O Q ~@9 L§gks_ ~ C [0 m LL ~ ~^^Y °F~= ~°~~H~. °~„ ~ C a~'P6 ~~" ~"- ul (U m ~ ~ ~Bgs ~~q~== ~1 = = _ ~sQeg _ 'Pfe e:r ` _j -g ~~"~3Ee"q3" - • <J _Ee Saaf ~°~ ~ rF $.~~ ~~ ~ P91 APPENDIX C The fol]owing pages show the assessment rate and method of apportionment for each of the eight Districts. Please refer to the annual reports of the City Engineer (the ``Reports") for a full and complete description of the rates and methods of apportionment for each District. STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 Assessment Rate: $17.77 Assessment Methodology: Equivalent Dwelling Unit ("EDU") Single Family Residential = I.00 EDU per parcel Multi-Fantily Residential = 1.00 EDU per parcel Commercial/Industrial = 2.00 EDU per acre Vacant Land = 2.00 EDU per acre STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 Assessment Rate: $39.97 Assessment Methodology: Equivalent Dwelling Unit ("EDU") Single Family Residential = 1.00 EDU per parcel Multi-Family Residential = 1.00 EDU per parcel Commercial/Industrial = 2.00 EDU per acre Vacant Land = 2.00 EDU per acre STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0.3 Assessment Rate: $47.15 Assessment Methodology: Equivalent Dwelling Unit ("EDU") Single Family Residential = 1.00 EDU per parcel Multi-Family Residential = 1.00 EDU per parcel Commercial/Industrial = 2.00 EDU per acre Vacant Land = 2.00 EDU per acre STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 4 Assessment Rate: $28.96 Assessment Methodology: Equivalent Dwelling Unit ("EDU") Single Family Residential = 1.00 EDU per parcel Multi-Family Residential = 0.50 EDU per dwelling unit P92 Commercial/Industrial = 2.00 EDU per acre Vacant Land = 2.00 EDU per acre STREET LIGHTING MATNTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 5 Assessment Rate: $34.60 Assessment Methodology: Equivalent Dwelling Unit ("EDU") Single Family Residential = 1.00 EDU per parcel Multi-Family Residential = 1.00 EDU per unit Commercial/Industrial = 2.00 EDU per acre Vacant Land = 2.00 EDU per acre STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 6 Assessment Rate: $51.40 Assessment Methodology: Equivalent Dwelling Unit (``EDU") Single Family Residential = 1.00 EDU per parcel Multi-Family Residential = 1.00 EDU per unit Commercial/Industrial = 1.00 EDU per acre Vacant Land = 2.00 EDU per acre STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 7 Assessment Rate: $33.32 Assessment Methodology: Equivalent Dwelling Unit ("EDU") Single Family Residential = 1.00 EDU per parcel Multi-Family Residential = 1.00 EDU per unit Commercial/Industrial = 2.00 EDU per acre Vacant Land = 2.00 EDU per acre STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 8 Assessment Rate: $193.75 Assessment Methodology: Equivalent Dwelling Unit ("EDU") Single Family Residential = 1.00 EDU per parcel Multi-Family Residential = I.00 EDU per unit Commercial/Industrial = 2.00 EDU per acre Vacant Land = 2.00 EDU per acre P93 PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of June 2009. Donald J. Kurth, M.D., Mayor ATTEST: Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk I, JANICE C. REYNOLDS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the day of June 2009. Executed this day of June 2009, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk P94 Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2009/2010 City of Rancho Cucamonga Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 (Arterial Streets) P95 ENGINEER'S REPORT AFFIDAVIT Rancho Cucamonga Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 (Arterial Streets) City of Rancho Cucamonga San Bernardino County, State of California This Report describes the District and all relevant zones therein including the improvements, budgets, parcels and assessments to be levied for Fiscal Year 2009/10, as they existed at the time of the passage of the Resolution of Intention. Reference is hereby made to the San Bernardino County assessor's maps for a detailed description of the lines and dimensions of parcels within the District. The undersigned respectively submits the enclosed Report as directed by.the City Council. Dated this 3rd day Approved by: of Engineering Services/City Engineer No. CD59672 ~. spa ~ a P96 TABLE OF CONTENTS OVERVIEW ............................................................................................. 4 SECTION 1 -DESCRIPTION OF FACILITIES :...................................... 5 SECTION 2 -ESTIMATE OF COSTS AND EXPENSES :....................... 6 SECTION 3 -METHOD OF ASSESSMENT APPORTIONMENT:.......... 7 A. GENERAL ......................................................................................... 7 B. ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY ............................................................ 7 C. ASSESSMENT .................................................................................... S SECTION 4 -ANNEXATIONS :............................................................... 9 SECTION 5 -BOUNDARY MAP :..................................................10 P97 Overview The Fiscal Year 2009/10 Annual Report for Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 (Arterial streets) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 1, Chapter 1, Part 2, Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Street Lighting and Light Act of 1972, "the 1972 Act"). Section 1 Description of Facilities The plans and specifications for improvements maintained by Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 ("SLD #1" or the "District") consist of a general description of the nature, location, and the extent of the improvements proposed to be maintained, and are attached hereto. Section - 2 Estimates of Cost and Expenses An estimate of the maintenance cost of the improvements, including incidental costs and expenses in connection therewith for Fiscal Year 2009/10, is set forth on the lists thereof. attached hereto. Section - 3 Method of Assessment Apportionment Discusses the methodology used for calculating assessments in the District. The method reflects the composition of the parcels, and the improvements and services provided, to fairly apportion the costs based on benefit to each parcel. The assessment roll states the net amount to be assessed upon all assessable lands within the District for Fiscal Year 2009/10, and describes each assessable lot or parcel of land within the District. These lots and parcels are more particularly described on the County assessment Roll, which is on file in the office of the San Bernardino County Assessor and by reference is made a part of this Engineer's Report Section - 4 Annexations List the developments, which have annexed to SLD #1 during Calendar year 2008. 4 P98 Section 1 -Description of Facilities: Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 ("SLD #1" or the "District") is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located on arterial streets throughout the City. These sites consist of several non-contiguous areas throughout the City. As such, the parcels within this District do not represent a distinct district area as do the other SLD's within the City. Typically new parcels within this District have been annexed upon development. The sites maintained by the District consist of street lights on arterial streets and traffic signals on arterial streets within the rights-of-way or designated easements of streets dedicated to the City. Typically, street lights are installed by private development as a condition of a development project's approval. Traffic signals can be installed by development or as a City capital improvement project. Historically, the installation of street lights and traffic signals has not been funded with Street Light District funds however, this is permitted under the 1972 Act and the District has, in more recent years, begun funding these costs through the assessment of properties within the District. Any new street lights in areas to be maintained by the District will become part of the active work program at such time as these new areas are annexed into the District. The normal process will be the dedication of the areas to the City, at which time a sufficient non-refundable deposit will be made by the developer to the City. This deposit will provide for costs of energizing and six months of ordinary and usual maintenance, operation and servicing of the street lights in each development at the time of initial operation of the lighting system. Such deposit enables the City to pay for the first six months of operating costs, prior to collecting any assessment monies from the County. The costs will be based on the number and type of street lights and based on Southern California Edison Company's electricity rates for street lights. Immediately upon the energizing of the street lights, those street lights will become a part of the work program of the District. 5 P99 Section 2 -Estimate of Costs and Expenses: The majority of the budgeted operating costs for SLD #1 are for electric utility charges for the streetlights and traffic signals within the District. The projected costs to operate and maintain SLD #1 are as follows: FISCAL YEAR 2009/10 ESTIMATED BUDGET $726,250.00 Operations & Maintenance Equip Maintenance and Operations Membership Dues Contract Services Telephone Utilities Electric Utilities Assessment Administration Assessment Administration and General Overhead Intertund Allocation Capital Expenditures Capital Project Subtotal Capital Expenditures Total SLD #1 Expenditure Budget Contribution to Reserves Estimate of Costs & Expenses: Total EDU Assessment Rate per EDU $500.00 $4,000.00 $8,340.00 $1,180.00 $700,000.00 $154,770.00 $53,090.00 $16,290.00 $240,000.00 $1,178,170.00 ($451,920.00 $726,250.00 40,869.44 $17.77 6 P100 Section 3 -Method of Assessment Apportionment: A. General The 1972 Act permits the establishment of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include construction, maintenance and servicing of public lights, landscaping and appurtenant facilities. The 1972 Act further requires that the cost of these improvements be levied according to special benefit to the assessed properties, rather than the assessed value of said properties: "The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements." The formula used for calculating assessments in the District therefore reflects the composition of the parcels, and the improvements and services provided, to fairly apportion the costs based on the special benefit received by each assessed parcel. B. Assessment Methodology .Equivalent Dwelling Units: To assess benefits equitably, it is necessary to relate the different types of parcel improvements to each other. The Equivalent Dwelling Unit method of apportionment uses the single-family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single family home equals one Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU). Every other land-use is converted to EDU's based on an assessment formula that equates the property's specific development status, type of development (land-use), and size of the property, as compared to asingle-family home (SFR). The EDU method of apportioning benefit is typically seen as the most appropriate and equitable assessment methodology for calculating benefit in districts formed under the 1972 Act, as the benefit to each parcel from improvements are apportioned as a function of land-use type, size and development. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land-use types to determine each parcel's EDU. LAND-USE/EQUIVALENT DWELLING UNITS EDU Value Multi Commercial 2.00 Acres Vacant 2.00 Acres Multi-Family 1.00 Parcel Single Family Residential 1.00 Parcel 7 P101 The following table summarizes the assessment rate for the district: Land Use Tvpe Single Family Multi-Family Commercial/Industrial Assessment Rate $17.77/SFD $17.77/DU $35.54/Acre The assessment rate is derived by dividing the total number of EDU within the District by the Total Estimate of Costs ($726,250.00/40,869.44=$17.77). C. Assessment All assessed lots or parcels within the District are listed on the assessment role, which is on file in the office of the City Clerk and the City Engineer, and are hereby made a part of this Engineer's Report, by reference. The assessment roll states the net amount to be assessed upon all assessable lands within the District for Fiscal Year 2009/10, and describes each assessable lot or parcel of land within the District. These lots and parcels are more particularly described on the County assessment Roll, which is on file in the office of the San Bernardino County Assessor and by reference is made a part of this Engineer's Report. 8 P102 Section 4 -Annexations: Calendar Year 2008 Annexations Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 DRC2005-00287 1.69 AC 1 /16/2008 TR17818 6.97 AC 1 /16/2008 DRC2005-01060 40 MFR 5!7/2008 DRC2007-00491 1 SFR 5/7/2008 DRC2006-00692 1.93 AC 6/18!2008 PM17808 (Tentative) 2 SFR 6/18/2008 13254 BANYAN AVE 1 SFR 7/16/2008 TR17919 50 SFR 7/16/2008 DRC2005-00831 1.09 AC 8/20/2008 DRC2008-00357 0.19 AC 10/15/2008 DRC2006-00633 66 MFR 11 /19/2008 DRC2006-00866 •0.41 AC 11 /19/2008 TR18994 5.47 AC 12/3/2008 9 P10~ n ~ ~ ~, V '~ y 0 >. o ~ Q U cA ~n ~ ~ 0 V ~ ~ ~~~ ~ } ~ •~' ~ ~ J o ~ ~ N / ~ ~ '" W *~I C O J m ~ • ~ Q) m O ~ LL Q '~" ny ~se~ ~ L_ .~ ® ~ J ny epuenn!~~ ~i.~ L ny ~a}sa yoo~ ny ~a~sayao~ ny ua~{!II!W ny ua~!II~W ny uaneH ny uaneH ny esoua~aH ny esou~~aF{ ny pleq!ya~y nb' pleq!Ua~b ~ ny uewllaH ny uewllaH ~ L L_ ~ ny p~e~au !/~ ~: ~~tr ~` - ~ _ ~ ~ nyanoa~ a~. `'~`'_° ~~r` (n ~ _ C~ ~ C/~ ~~ t aE r " ~ J = .~.. ye °~~ e~~ kl~ :S~gS93 p-~ ~ L O CO ~5a~ ~irfy ~ ~ ~ ~ O Q "a°~-F,~~q ~" ' ~ c Cf] LL ~~°z z~a; ~ ~ ~ ~, c``"°~~~Cs~z` i ~ aca ' _ fn ~ t~ s ~ `EC P" ~ `1 ' - ~] q c~ g~~c ~_yg; ~ 4 a x= : ~ = e v ?~kr.%r'.'°~.,~2 P104 Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2009/2010 City of Rancho Cucamonga Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 (Local streets) P105 ENGINEER'S REPORT AFFIDAVIT Rancho Cucamonga Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 (Local Streets) City of Rancho Cucamonga San Bernardino County, State of California This Report describes the District and all relevant zones therein including the improvements, budgets, parcels and assessments to be levied for Fiscal Year 2009/10, as they existed at the time of the passage of the Resolution of Intention. Reference is hereby made to the San Bernardino County assessor's maps for a detailed description of the lines and dimensions of parcels within the District. The undersigned respectively submits the enclosed Report as directed by the City Council. Dated this 3rd day of Ju Approved by: of Engineering Services/City Engineer No. C053672 ~. s~3o-1 1 P106 TABLE OF CONTENTS OVERVIEW .................................................................................1 SECTION 1 -DESCRIPTION OF FACILITIES ....................................2 SECTION 2 -ESTIMATE OF COSTS AND EXPENSES ........................3 SECTION 3 -METHOD OF ASSESSMENT APPORTIONMENT............4 A. GENERAL .............................................................................4 B. ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY .............................................4 C. ASSESSMENT .......................................................................4 SECTION - 4 ANNEXATIONS ..........................................................6 SECTION - 5 BOUNDARY MAP .......................................................7 P107 Overview The Fiscal Year 2009/10 Annual Report for Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 (Local streets) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 1, Chapter 1, Part 2, Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Street Lighting and Light Act of 1972, "the 1972 Act"). Section 1 Description of Facilities The plans and specifications for improvements maintained by Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 ("SLD #2" or the "District") consist of a general description of the nature, location, and the extent of the improvements proposed to be maintained. and are attached hereto. Section - 2 Estimates of Cost and Expenses An estimate of the maintenance cost of the improvements, including incidental costs and expenses in connection therewith for Fiscal Year 2009/10, is set forth on the lists thereof, attached hereto. Section - 3 Method of Assessment Apportionment Discusses the methodology used for calculating assessments in the District. The method reflects the composition of the parcels, and the improvements and services provided, to fairly apportion the costs based on benefit to each parcel. The assessment roll states the net amount to be assessed upon all assessable lands within the District for Fiscal Year 2009/10, and describes each assessable lot or parcel of land within the District. These lots and parcels are more particularly described on the County assessment Roll, which is on file in the office of the San Bernardino County Assessor and by reference is made a part of this Engineers Report Section - 4 Annexations List the developments, which have annexed to SLD #2 during Calendar year 2008. 1 P108 Section 1 -Description of Facilities: Street Light Maintenance District No. 2 ("SLD #2" or the "District") is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located on local streets throughout the City but excluding those areas already in another local maintenance district. Generally, this area encompasses the residential area of the City west of Haven Avenue. It has been determined that the facilities in this District benefit this area of the City specifically. The sites maintained by the District consist of street lights on local streets and traffic signals (or a portion thereof) on local streets generally west of Haven Avenue. Typically, street lights are installed by private development as a condition of a development project's approval. Traffic signals can be installed by development or as a City capital improvement project. Historically, the installation of street lights and traffic signals has not been funded with Street Light District funds however, this is permitted under the 1972 Act and the District has, in more recent years, begun funding these costs through the assessment of properties within the District. Any new street lights in areas to be maintained by the District will become part of the active work program at such time as these new areas are annexed into the District. The normal process will be the dedication of the areas to the City, at which time a sufficient non-refundable deposit will be made by the developer to the City. This deposit will provide for costs of energizing and six months of ordinary and usual maintenance, operation and servicing of the street lights in each development at the time of initial operation of the lighting system. Such deposit enables the City to pay for the first six months of operating costs, prior to collecting any assessment monies from the County. The costs will be based on the number and type of street lights and based on Southern California Edison Company's electricity rates for street lights. Immediately upon the energizing of the street lights, those street lights will become a part of the work program of the District. 2 P109 Section 2 -Estimate of Costs and Expenses: The majority of the budgeted operating costs for SLD #2 are for electric utility charges for the street lights and traffic signals within the district. The projected costs to operate and maintain SLD #2 are as follows: Operations & Maintenance Electric Utilities $338,210.00 Assessment Administration $38,070.00 Admin/General Overhead $24,890.00 Total SLD #2 Expenditure Budget $401,170.00 Expenditure of Reserves -$71,960.00 Estimate of Casts & Expenses: $329,210.00 Total EDU 8,236.43 Assessment Rate per EDU $39.97 P110 Section 3 -Method of Assessment Apportionment: A. General The 1972 Act permits the establishment of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include construction, maintenance and servicing of public lights, landscaping and appurtenant facilities. The 1972 Act further requires that the cost of these improvements be levied according to special benefit to the assessed properties, rather than the assessed value of said properties: "The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements. " The formula used for calculating assessments in the District therefore reflects the composition of the parcels, and the improvements and services provided, to fairly apportion the costs based on the special benefit received by each assessed parcel. B. Assessment Methodology Equivalent Dwelling Units: To assess benefits equitably, it is necessary to relate the different types of parcel improvements to each other. The Equivalent Dwelling Unit method of apportionment uses the single-family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single family home equals one Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU). Every other land-use is converted to EDU's based on an assessment formula that equates the property's specific development status, type of development (land-use), and size of the property, as compared to asingle-family home (SFR). The EDU method of apportioning benefit is typically seen as the most appropriate and equitable assessment methodology for calculating benefit in districts formed under the 1972 Act, as the benefit to each parcel from improvements are apportioned as a function of land-use type, size and development. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land-use types to determine each parcel's EDU. LAND-USE/EQUIVALENT DWELLING UNITS EDU Value r Vacant 2.00 Acres Multi-Family 1.00 Unit Single Family Residential 1.00 Unit 4 P111 The following table summarizes the assessment rate for the district: Land Use Type Single Family Multi-Family Commercial/Industrial Assessment Rate $39.97/SFD $39.97/DU $79.94/Acre The assessment rate is derived by dividing the total number of EDU within the District by the Total Estimate of Costs ($329,210.00/8,236.43=$39.97). C. Assessment All assessed lots or parcels within the District are listed on the assessment role, which is on file in the office of the City Clerk and the City Engineer, and are hereby made a part of this Engineer's Report, by reference. The assessment roll states the net amount to be assessed upon all assessable lands within the District for Fiscal Year 2009/10, and describes each assessable lot or parcel of land within the District. These lots and parcels are more particularly described on the County assessment Roll, which is on file in the office of the San Bernardino County Assessor and by reference is made a part of this Engineer's Report. 5 P11~ N _~ ~ ~ ~, V w ~~ .= _ J N Q ~ ~ ~ J > Q = U (A ~n ~ o V ° ~ ~.~ _ ~ J 1 .~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ .._.._.._.._ N ~ ~ o r J m ~ • A_ir ~ ~ L ~ O j lL Q '~`' i ny ~se3 ~ v ~ J ~ ny epuennl~~ ny epuennl~~ Y~ j G1 +~ ~ .~ ~g ~{aa~~ ea ~ ~.._.._.._.._.._. ._..- i ~ ny as;sa yoo~{ ny ~a~sayoo~ r"' r.._.._.._.._ ny ua~iIIIW ~ i ny ua~!II!W ny uaneH ny uaneH ny esouaaaH ny esoua~aH ny Plegiyo~y nb, pleglyo~b' ~ ny ueuallaH ny uewllaH ~ L_ ~ ny p~e~(au i/~ iS uellawe~ z~ea_ s°, = - ~~~'a~~_4 ~~~:=,~ ~ ~~s~ ~''}€ _ nyano~~ { ~ y ~ € C~ C _ CD Q_' Cn _ _ r . !tc ~'R_i E L J = ~ L p~~E~~3 _-Yy Y -i E55EV ~C:,g ~ ' ° ~ cn ~ (0 `~A &F Ftig~ ~j~ ~,g~ x~~"spa m a:c~~og~F4c~ o '~1 = ~¢~,ot~~~gF r~a QO > ~ g=or ` z6io o!t . / y y E Y U ~Fq a. °o~.? P113 Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2009/2010 City of Rancho Cucamonga Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3 (Victoria Planned Community) P114 ENGINEER'S REPORT AFFIDAVIT Rancho Cucamonga Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3 (Victoria Planned Community) City of Rancho Cucamonga San Bernardino County, State of California This Report describes the District and all relevant zones therein including the improvements, budgets, parcels and assessments to be levied for Fiscal Year 2009/10, as they existed at the time of the passage of the Resolution of Intention. Reference is hereby made to the San Bernardino County assessor's maps for a detailed description of the lines and dimensions of parcels within the District. The undersigned respectively submits the enclosed Report as directed by the City Council. Dated this 3`d day of June, 2009 Approved by: Mark S~Cier, Dir~f Engineering Services/City Engineer No. C053672 ' Exp. E3o- 1 1 P115 TABLE OF CONTENTS OVERVIEW .................................................................................1 SECTION 1 -DESCRIPTION OF FACILITIES ....................................2 SECTION 2 -ESTIMATE OF COSTS AND EXPENSES ........................3 SECTION 3 -METHOD OF ASSESSMENT APPORTIONMENT............4 A. GENERAL .............................................................................4 B. ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY .............................................4 C. ASSESSMENT .......................................................................4 SECTION - 4 ANNEXATIONS ..........................................................6 SECTION - 5 BOUNDARY MAP .......................................................7 P116 Overview The Fiscal Year 2009/10 Annual Report for Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3 (Victoria Planned Community) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 1, Chapter 1, Part 2, Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Street Lighting and Light Act of 1972, "the 1972 Act"). Section 1 Description of Facilities The plans and specifications for improvements maintained by Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3 ("SLD #3" or the "District") consist of a general description of the nature, location, and the extent of the improvements proposed to be maintained, and are attached hereto. Section - 2 Estimates of Cost and Expenses An estimate of the maintenance cost of the improvements, including incidental costs and expenses in connection therewith for Fiscal Year 2009/10, is set forth on the lists thereof, attached hereto. Section - 3 Method of Assessment Apportionment Discusses the methodology used for calculating assessments in the District. The method reflects the composition of the parcels, and the improvements and services provided, to fairly apportion the costs based on benefit to each parcel. The assessment roll states the net amount to be assessed upon all assessable lands within the District for Fiscal Year 2009/10, and describes each assessable lot or parcel of land within the District. These lots and parcels are more particularly described on the County assessment Roll, which is on file in the office of the San Bernardino County Assessor and by reference is made a part of this Engineer's Report Section - 4 Annexations List the developments, which have annexed to SLD #1 during Calendar year 2008. P117 Section 1 -Description of Facilities: Street Light Maintenance District No. 3 ("SLD #3" or the "District") is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located within the Victoria Planned Community. This area generally encompasses the area of the City east of Deer Creek Channel, south of Highland Avenue, north of Base Line Road, and west of Etiwanda Avenue. It has been determined that the facilities in this District provide special benefit to the properties within this area of the City. This sites maintained by the District consist of streetlights on local streets and traffic signals (or a portion thereof) on local streets within the Victoria Planned Community. Typically, street lights are installed by private development as a condition of a development project's approval. Traffic signals can be installed by development or as a City capital improvement project. Historically, the installation of street lights and traffic signals has not been funded with Street Light District funds however, this is permitted under the 1972 Act and the District has, in more recent years, begun funding these costs through the assessment of properties within the District. Any new street lights in areas to be maintained by the District will become part of the active work program at such time as these new areas are annexed into the District. The normal process will be the dedication of the areas to the City, at which time a sufficient non-refundable deposit will be made by the developer to the City. This deposit will provide for costs of energizing and six months of ordinary and usual maintenance, operation and servicing of the street lights in each development at the time of initial operation of the lighting system. Such deposit enables the City to pay for the first six months of operating costs, prior to collecting any assessment monies from the County. The costs will be based on the number and type of street lights and based on Southern California Edison Company's electricity rates for street lights. Immediately upon the energizing of the street lights, those street lights will become a part of the work program of the District. P118 Section 2 -Estimate of Costs and Expenses: The majority of the budgeted operating costs for SLD #3 are for electric utility charges for the street lights and traffic signals within the district. The projected costs to operate and maintain SLD #3 are as follows: FISCAL YEAR 2009/10 ESTIMATED BUDGET $330,380.00 Operations 8~Maintenance Maintenance and Operations $2,000.00 Contract Services $8,340.00 Electric Utilities $348,000.00 Assessment Administration $34,890.00 Admin/General Overhead $21,920.00 Interfund Allocation $16,290.00 Total SLD #3 Expenditure Budget $431,440.00 Contribution to Reserves -$101,060.0( Estimate of Costs & Expenses: Total EDU 7,007.00 Assessment Rate per EDU $47.15 P119 Section 3 -Method of Assessment Apportionment: A. General The 1972 Act permits the establishment of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include construction, maintenance and servicing of public lights, landscaping and appurtenant facilities. The 1972 Act further requires that the cost of these improvements be levied according to special benefit to the assessed properties, rather than the assessed value of said properties: " The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion fo fhe estimated benefits to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements. " The formula used for calculating assessments in the District therefore reflects the composition of the parcels, and the improvements and services provided, to fairly apportion the costs based on the special benefit received by each assessed parcel. B. Assessment Methodology Equivalent Dwelling Units: To assess benefits equitably, it is necessary to relate the different types of parcel improvements to each other. The Equivalent Dwelling Unit method of apportionment uses the single-family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single family home equals one Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU). Every other land-use is converted to EDU's based on an assessment formula that equates the property's specific development status, type of development (land-use), and size of the property, as compared to asingle-family home (SFR). The EDU method of apportioning benefit is typically seen as the most appropriate and equitable assessment methodology for calculating benefit in districts formed under the 1972 Act, as the benefit to each parcel from improvements are apportioned as a function of land-use type, size and development. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land-use types to determine each parcel's EDU. LAND-USE/EQUIVALENT DWELLING UNITS EDU Value Multi Commercial 2.00 Acres Vacant 2.00 Acres Single Family Residential 1.00 Parcel Multi-Family Residential 1.00 Parcel P120 The following table summarizes the assessment rate for the district: Land Use Type Single Family Multi-Family Commercial/Industrial Assessment Rate $47.15/SFD $47.15/DU $94.30/Acre The assessment rate is derived by dividing the total number of EDU within the District by the Total Estimate of Costs ($330,380.00/7,007.00=$39.97). C. Assessment All assessed lots or parcels within the District are listed on the assessment role, which is on file in the office of the City Clerk and the City Engineer, and are hereby made a part of this Engineer's Report, by reference. The assessment roll states the net amount to be assessed upon all assessable lands within the District for Fiscal Year 2009/10, and describes each assessable lot or parcel of land within the District. These lots and parcels are more particularly described on the County assessment Roll, which is on file in the office of the San Bernardino County Assessor and by reference is made a part of this Engineer's Report. P121 Section 4 -Annexations: Calendar Year 2008 Annexations Street Light Maintenance District No. 3 PROJECT UNITS ANNEX DATE NO ANNEXATIONS P122 M _~ ~ ~~ 'i N 'y J Q r 0 ~ c ~' ~ Q U cn ~n 0 J ~ o ~ ~ 1 .._.._.._.._ ~ c~ .Q j ~ c o '~ ~ .1 m ~ ~ ! ~ ~ 3 j m o 0 ~ Q ~ i ~ s ~ ~ ny epuenn!;3 ® ny epuennl;3 ~ ~ ~ ~8 ~aa~~ ea i ny ~a;sayooa • ny ~a;sayoo~ P" i r.._.._.._.._. ny ua~{!II!W ny ua~lll!W ! i i i ny uaneH • ny uaneH i i ny esow~aH i ny esow~aH i ny pleq!yo~y . nd Pleq!yo~t1 i ! .~ ~ ny ueuallaH ny uewllaH i ~ L ~• ~ r ~ v ~ ny p el(au!n 3S ue!lawe~ ~~_~!~~~~~~s O ~$ ~ ~~3 a ppl!~~FgCgr Z ~ ~8d~$by'SYE~ - J ~I~aS~~a~:: P123 Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2009/2010 City of Rancho Cucamonga Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 4 (Terra Vista Planned Community) P124 ENGINEER'S REPORT AFFIDAVIT Rancho Cucamonga Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 4 (Terra Vista Planned Community) City of Rancho Cucamonga San Bernardino County, State of California This Report describes the District and all relevant zones therein including the improvements, budgets, parcels and assessments to be levied for Fiscal Year 2009/10, as they existed at the time of the passage of the Resolution of Intention. Reference is hereby made to the San Bernardino County assessor's maps for a detailed description of the lines and dimensions of parcels within the District. The undersigned respectively submits the enclosed Report as directed by the City Council. Dated this 3rd day of Approved by: Engineering Services/City Engineer No. C053672 Eap• 6.30.1 1 P125 TABLE OF CONTENTS OVERVIEW .................................................................................1 SECTION 1 -DESCRIPTION OF FACILITIES ....................................2 SECTION 2 -ESTIMATE OF COSTS AND EXPENSES ........................3 SECTION 3 -METHOD OF ASSESSMENT APPORTIONMENT............4 A. GENERAL .............................................................................4 B. ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY .............................................4 C. ASSESSMENT .......................................................................4 SECTION - 4 ANNEXATIONS ..........................................................6 SECTION - 5 BOUNDARY MAP .......................................................7 P126 Overview The Fiscal Year 2009/10 Annual Report for Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 4 (Terra Vista Planned Community) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 1, Chapter 1, Part 2, Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Street Lighting and Light Act of 1972, "the 1972 Act"). Section 1 Description of Facilities The plans and specifications for improvements maintained by Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 4 ("SLD #4" or the "District") consist of a general description of the nature, location, and the extent of the improvements proposed to be maintained, and are attached hereto. Section - 2 Estimates of Cost and Expenses An estimate of the maintenance cost of the improvements, including incidental costs and expenses in connection therewith for Fiscal Year 2009/10, is set forth on the lists thereof, attached hereto. Section - 3 Method of Assessment Apportionment Discusses the methodology used for calculating assessments in the District. The method reflects the composition of the parcels, and the improvements and services provided, to fairly apportion the costs based on benefit to each parcel. The assessment roll states the net amount to be assessed upon all assessable lands within the District for Fiscal Year 2009/10, and describes each assessable lot or parcel of land within the District. These lots and parcels are more particularly described on the County assessment Roll, which is on file in the office of the San Bernardino County Assessor and by reference is made a part of this Engineer's Report Section - 4 Annexations List the developments, which have annexed to SLD #4 during Calendar year 2008. 1 P127 Section 1 -Description of Facilities: Street Light Maintenance District No. 4 ("SLD #4" or the "District") is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located within the Terra Vista Planned Community. Generally, this area encompasses the residential area of the City east of Haven Avenue, south of Base Line Road, north of Foothill Boulevard and west of f2ochester Avenue. It has been determined that the facilities in this District provide special benefit to the properties within this area of the City. The sites maintained by the District consist of street lights on local streets and traffic signals (or a portion thereof) on local streets within the Terra Vista Planned Community. Typically, street lights are installed by private development as a condition of a development project's approval. Traffic signals can be installed by development or as a City capital improvement project. Historically, the installation of street lights and traffic signals has not been funded with Street Light District funds however, this is permitted under the 1972 Act and the District has, in more recent years, begun funding these costs through the assessment of properties within the District. Any new street lights in areas to be maintained by the District will become part of the active work program at such time as these new areas are annexed into the District. The normal process will be the dedication of the areas to the City, at which time a sufficient non-refundable deposit will be made by the developer to the City. This deposit will provide for costs of energizing and six months of ordinary and usual maintenance, operation and servicing of the street lights in each development at the time of initial operation of the lighting system. Such deposit enables the City to pay for the first six months of operating costs, prior to collecting any assessment monies from the County. The costs will be based on the number and type of street lights and based on Southern California Edison Company's electricity rates for street lights. Immediately upon the energizing of the street lights, those street lights will become a part of the work program of the District. 2 P128 Section 2 -Estimate of Costs and Expenses: The majority of the budgeted operating costs for SLD #4 are for electric utility charges for the street lights and traffic signals within the District. The projected costs to operate and maintain SLD #4 are as follows: Operations & Maintenance Equipment Maintenance $500.00 Contract Services $8,340.00 Electric Utilities $200,940.00 Assessment Administration $20,850.00 Admi n/General Overhead $10,930.00 Total SLD #4 Expenditure Budget $241,560.00 Contribution to Reserves ($92,700.00 Estimate of Costs & Expenses: $148,860.00 Total EDU Assessment Rate per EDU 5,140.19 $28.96 3 P 129 Section 3 -Method of Assessment Apportionment: A. General The 1972 Act permits the establishment of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include construction, maintenance and servicing of public lights, landscaping and appurtenant facilities. The 1972 Act further requires that the cost of these improvements be levied according to special benefit to the assessed properties, rather than the assessed value of said properties: "The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements." The formula used for calculating assessments in the District therefore reflects the composition of the parcels, and the improvements and services provided, to fairly apportion the costs based on the special benefit received by each assessed parcel. B. Assessment Methodology Equivalent Dwelling Units: To assess benefits equitably, it is necessary to relate the different types of parcel improvements to each other. The Equivalent Dwelling Unit method of apportionment uses the single-family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single family home equals one Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU). Every other land-use is converted to EDU's based on an assessment formula that equates the property's specific development status, type of development (land-use), and size of the property, as compared to asingle-family home (SFR). The EDU method of apportioning benefit is typically seen as the most appropriate and equitable assessment methodology for calculating benefit in districts formed under the 1972 Act, as the benefit to each parcel from improvements are apportioned as a function of land-use type, size and development. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land-use types to determine each parcel's EDU. LAND-USE/EQUIVALENT DWELLING UNITS Property Type EDU Value Multiplier Commercial 2.00 Acres Vacant 2.00 Acres Multi-Family 0.5 Unit Single Family Residential 1.00 Parcel 4 P130 The following table summarizes the assessment rate for the district: Land Use Type Single Family Multi-Family Commercial/Industrial Assessment Rate $28.96/SFD $14.48/DU $57.92/Acre The assessment rate is derived by dividing the total number of EDU within the District by the Total Estimate of Costs ($148,860.00/5,140.19=$28.96). C. Assessment All assessed lots or parcels within the District are listed on the assessment role, which is on file in the office of the City Clerk and the City Engineer, and are hereby made a part of this Engineer's Report, by reference. The assessment roll states the net amount to be assessed upon all assessable lands within the District for Fiscal Year 2009/10, and describes each assessable lot or parcel of land within the District. These lots and parcels are more particularly described on the County assessment Roll, which is on file in the office of the San Bernardino County Assessor and by reference is made a part of this Engineer's Report. 5 P131 Section 4 -Annexations: Calendar Year 2008 Annexations Street Light Maintenance District No. 4 P132 ~' ~ m ~ ~~ r ~~ w *d N ^~ ~ J O ~ ~ J > ~ C U cn ~ ~n ° ~ v N °' ~'~ti •~ ~ J ~ ~ Qy ~ c o . r . J _ m ~ ~~ ! ~ ~ m ~ o 3 0 j ~ Q ~ y r _.._.._ i ny lSe3 cn f w =J ~ 1 v J ~ ny epuenn!;3 ~ ny epuenn!;3 ~1.+ j 1 w ~g ~aaJ~ ea i ~ ny Ja;sayao~ ny Ja;sayoo~ r"' r.._.._.._.._. ny ua~lll!W i i nt/ ua~l!II!W i i i ny uaneH • ny uaneH i i ny esowJaH ~ ny esowJaH i ny Pleq!yoJy . nd Pleq!y~Jd i ~ ny uewllaH i ~~ ~ ny UewllaH •• 1 t sf L v ~ ny p e~(auln 3S ueilawe~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~; ~~~~ r ~ 2 ~i g ~ •~. • ~. _ ££ ~ e e °~a a~~~~~~ 1.._.._.. ~ •._..r._. ny anOJ~ ~ F~''~~~ze$~B$ '~• . J ~ ~ ~ ~ ~,SB z~~E ~g~g ~~ 'p ~ . . f0 O Q ~ ~~Se~$~~~~~: ~ c m LL fa ~ gEF~:~a ~~ ~ ~ ~f~ c}a€ ~~ EL !. m _ OZ = m m g~~~t~~°i€ga E~~g, ZaFgg'a~ ~~¢~a ~~~ya;~ ~' J e '=i~=ax ~F~2 y~Vj e~ 9 t E F E3 ~~~a ... ~ ~ ~ . g P133 Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2009/2010 City of Rancho Cucamonga Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 5 (Caryn Community) P134 ENGINEER'S REPORT AFFIDAVIT Rancho Cucamonga Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 5 (Caryn Community) City of Rancho Cucamonga San Bernardino County, State of California This Report describes the District and all relevant zones therein including the improvements, budgets, parcels and assessments to be levied for Fiscal Year 2009/10, as they existed at the time of the passage of the Resolution of Intention. Reference is hereby made to the San Bernardino County assessor's maps for a detailed description of the lines and dimensions of parcels within the District. The undersigned respectively submits the enclosed Report as directed by the City Council. Dated this 3rd day of Approved by: of Engineering Services/City Engineer ~~c~a ~ i P135 TABLE OF CONTENTS OVERVIEW .................................................................................1 SECTION 1 -DESCRIPTION OF FACILITIES ....................................2 SECTION 2 -ESTIMATE OF COSTS AND EXPENSES ........................3 SECTION 3 -METHOD OF ASSESSMENT APPORTIONMENT............4 A. GENERAL .............................................................................4 B. ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY .............................................4 C. ASSESSMENT .......................................................................4 SECTION - 4 ANNEXATIONS ..........................................................6 SECTION - 5 BOUNDARY MAP .......................................................7 P136 Overview The Fiscal Year 2009/10 Annual Report for Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 5 (Caryn Community) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 1, Chapter 1, Part 2, Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Street Lighting and Light Act of 1972, "the 1972 Act"). Section 1 Description of Facilities The plans and specifications for improvements maintained by Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 5 ("SLD #5" or the "District") consist of a general description of the nature, location, and the extent of the improvements proposed to be maintained, and are attached hereto. Section - 2 Estimates of Cost and Expenses An estimate of the maintenance cost of the improvements, including incidental costs and expenses in connection therewith for Fiscal Year 2009/10, is set forth on the lists thereof, attached hereto. Section - 3 Method of Assessment Apportionment Discusses the methodology used for calculating assessments in the District. The method reflects the composition of the parcels, and the improvements and services provided, to fairly apportion the costs based on benefit to each parcel. The assessment roll states the net amount to be assessed upon all assessable lands within the District for Fiscal Year 2009/10, and describes each assessable lot or parcel of land within the District. These lots and parcels are more particularly described on the County assessment Roll, which is on file in the office of the San Bernardino County Assessor and by reference is made a part of this Engineer's Report Section - 4 Annexations List the developments, which have annexed to SLD #5 during Calendar year 2008. Section 1 -Description of Facilities: Street Light Maintenance District No. 5 ("SLD #5" or the "District") is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located within the Caryn Planned Community. Generally, this area encompasses the area of the City east of Milliken Avenue, south of Banyan Street, north of Highland Avenue and west of Rochester Avenue. It has been determined that the facilities in this District provide special benefit the properties within this area of the City. P137 This sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on local streets and traffic signals (or a portion thereof) on local streets within the Caryn Planned Community. Typically, street lights are installed by private development as a condition of a development project's approval. Traffic signals can be installed by development or as a City capital improvement project. Historically, the installation of street lights and traffic signals has not been funded with Street Light District funds however, this is permitted under the 1972 Act and the District has, in more recent years, begun funding these costs through the assessment of properties within the District. Any new street lights in areas to be maintained by the District will become part of the active work program at such time as these new areas are annexed into the District. The normal process will be the dedication of the areas to the City, at which time a sufficient non-refundable deposit will be made by the developer to the City. This deposit will provide for costs of energizing and six months of ordinary and usual maintenance, operation and servicing of the street lights in each development at the time of initial operation of the lighting system. Such deposit enables the City to pay for the first six months of operating costs, prior to collecting any assessment monies from the County. The costs will be based on the number and type of street lights and based on Southern California Edison Company's electricity rates for street lights. Immediately upon the energizing of the street lights, those street lights will become a part of the work program of the District. 2 P138 Section 2 -Estimate of Costs and Expenses: The majority of the budgeted operating costs for SLD #5 are for electric utility charges for the street lights and traffic signals within the district. The projected costs to operate and maintain SLD #5 are as follows: Operations & Maintenance Maintenance and Operations $1,500.00 Electric Utilities $95,500.00 Assessment Administration $6,950.00 Admin/General Overhead $3,080.00 Total SLD #5 Expenditure Budget $107,030.00 Expenditure of Reserves -$65,510.00 Estimate of Costs & Expenses: $41,520.00 Total EDU Assessment Rate per EDU 1,200.00 $34.60 3 P139 Section 3 -Method of Assessment Apportionment: A. General The 1972 Act permits the establishment of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include construction, maintenance and servicing of public lights, landscaping and appurtenant facilities. The 1972 Act further requires that the cost of these improvements be levied according to special benefit to the assessed properties, rather than the assessed value of said properties: "The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements. " The formula used for calculating assessments in the District therefore reflects the composition of the parcels, and the improvements and services provided, to fairly apportion the costs based on the special benefit received by each assessed parcel. B. Assessment Methodology Equivalent Dwelling Units: To assess benefits equitably, it is necessary to relate the different types of parcel improvements to each other. The Equivalent Dwelling Unit method of apportionment uses the single-family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single family home equals one Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU). Every other land-use is converted to EDU's based on an assessment formula that equates the property's specific development status, type of development (land-use), and size of the property, as compared to asingle-family home (SFR). The EDU method of apportioning benefit is typically seen as the most appropriate and equitable assessment methodology for calculating benefit in districts formed under the 1972 Act, as the benefit to each parcel from improvements are apportioned as a function of land-use type, size and development. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land-use types to determine each parcel's EDU. LAND-USE/EQUIVALENT DWELLING UNITS Property Type Single Family Residential Multi-Family Residential Commercial/Industrial Vacant EDU Value 1.00 Unit 1.00 Unit 2.00 Acres 2.00 Acres 4 r P140 The following table summarizes the assessment rate for the district: Land Use Tvpe Assessment Rate Single Family $34.60/SFD The assessment rate is derived by dividing the total number of EDU within the District by the Total Estimate of Costs ($41,520.00/1,200.00=$34.60). C. Assessment All assessed lots or parcels within the District are listed on the assessment role, which is on file in the office of the City Clerk and the City Engineer, and are hereby made a part of this Engineer's Report, by reference. The assessment roll states the net amount to be assessed upon all assessable lands within the District for Fiscal Year 2009/10, and describes each assessable lot or parcel of land within the District. These lots and parcels are more particularly described on the County assessment Roll, which is on file in the office of the San Bernardino County Assessor and by reference is made a part of this Engineer's Report. 5 P141 Section 4 -Annexations: Calendar Year 2008 Annexations Street Light Maintenance District No. 5 PROJECT UNITS ANNEX DATE NO ANNEXATIONS 6 P14~ ~ ~~ V •i w ' y"' ~ E ~ ~ Q ~ ~ Q ~ U w o C V ° d yr J o N /~• ; W ~ O +y e% 1 C J _ C~ ~ •~ 1 ~ ~ 0 3 ° ! m ° a` ~ y.r _.._.._i ^d lse3 in ~ t i 1 ~ •~ i ny epuenn!33 ny epuen~133 J •~. ~ ' ~ ~g ~aa~~ ea w ._.._.._.._.._. ._.._ y ny ~alsayooa ny ~alsayooa ~.. i ny ua~!!I!W r._.._.._.._.. nH ua~l!II!W i i i i ny uaneH 1 i ny uaneH ny esow~aH ; i ny esow~aH ny Pleq!yo~y i nV Pleq!yo~b' i ny uewllaH - ~ ~ ny uewllaH 1 ~ ,. s ~ L v 1 n ~eRau ~ y p !n E 6o~ppE ~5s4 E°~ lS ue!lawe~ ~ [[ EQ t€~E £~£9 ~d s9 i • 1 ..~~-` V ;s- ~ ;j ags~~ ggd~p{y~ a ~ ~ rI -~ _ . ~/~ 82°§ l a AE 9~e[~5 ded~~ ~.._..~ .• ~ _.._.-•ti. ny anal 3=s;' ~~~~ '~~ S E v ~ ~ o Q a£ie'i s~4fi~£i '~O C ~~e X£E31~@~s 3 °, 2 m i9y:rg$fiZ °~ a~S~dba a;g~ ~~ U E3~-~A3~ ~.o PSG:&~~ s~FE P143 Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2009/2010 City of Rancho Cucamonga Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 (Commercial/Industrial) P144 ENGINEER'S REPORT AFFIDAVIT Rancho Cucamonga Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 (Commercial/Industrial) City of Rancho Cucamonga San Bernardino County, State of California This Report describes the District and all relevant zones therein including the improvements, budgets, parcels and assessments to be levied for Fiscal Year 2009/10, as they existed at the time of the passage of the Resolution of Intention. Reference is hereby made to the San Bernardino County assessor's maps for a detailed description of the lines and dimensions of parcels within the District. The undersigned respectively submits the enclosed Report as directed by the City Council. Dated this 3rd day of June Approved Engineering Services/City Engineer No. C053672 Exp. 6.30- ] ] P145 TABLE OF CONTENTS OVERVIEW .................................................................................1 SECTION 1 -DESCRIPTION OF FACILITIES ....................................2 SECTION 2 -ESTIMATE OF COSTS AND EXPENSES ........................3 SECTION 3 -METHOD OF ASSESSMENT APPORTIONMENT............4 A. GENERAL .............................................................................4 B. ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY .............................................4 C. ASSESSMENT .......................................................................4 SECTION - 4 ANNEXATIONS ..........................................................6 SECTION - 5 BOUNDARY MAP .......................................................7 P146 Overview The Fiscal Year 2009/10 Annual Report for Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 (Commercial/Industrial) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 1, Chapter 1, Part 2, Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Street Lighting and Light Act of 1972, "the 1972 Act"). Section 1 Description of Facilities The plans and specifications for improvements maintained by Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 ("SLD #6" or the "District") consist of a general description of the nature, location, and the extent of the improvements proposed to be maintained. and are attached hereto. Section - 2 Estimates of Cost and Expenses An estimate of the maintenance cost of the improvements, including incidental costs and expenses in connection therewith for Fiscal Year 2009/10, is set forth on the lists thereof, attached hereto. Section - 3 Method of Assessment Apportionment Discusses the methodology used for calculating assessments in the District. The method reflects the composition of the parcels, and the improvements and services provided, to fairly apportion the costs based on benefit to each parcel. The assessment roll states the net amount to be assessed upon all assessable lands within the District for Fiscal Year 2009/10, and describes each assessable lot or parcel of land within the District. These lots and parcels are more particularly described on the County assessment Roll, which is on file in the office of the San Bernardino County Assessor and by reference is made a part of this Engineer's Report Section - 4 Annexations List the developments, which have annexed to SLD #6 during Calendar year 2008. P147 Section 1 -Description of Facilities: Street Light Maintenance District No. 6 ("SLD #6" or the "District") is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located on commercial and industrial streets throughout the City but excluding those areas already in a local maintenance district. Generally, this area encompasses the industrial area of the City south of Foothill Boulevard. It has been determined that the facilities in this District provide special benefit the properties within this area of the City. This sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on industrial or commercial streets and traffic signals (or a portion thereof) on industrial or commercial streets generally south of Foothill Boulevard. Typically, street lights are installed by private development as a condition of a development project's approval. Traffic signals can be installed by development or as a City capital improvement project. Historically, the installation of street lights and traffic signals has not been funded with Street Light District funds however, this is permitted under the 1972 Act and the District has, in more recent years, begun funding these costs through the assessment of properties within the District. Any new street lights in areas to be maintained by the District will become part of the active work program at such time as these new areas are annexed into the District. The normal process will be the dedication of the areas to the City, at which time a sufficient non-refundable deposit will be made by the developer to the City. This deposit will provide for costs of energizing and six months of ordinary and usual maintenance, operation and servicing of the street lights in each development at the time of initial operation of the lighting system. Such deposit enables the City to pay for the first six months of operating costs, prior to collecting any assessment monies from the County. The costs will be based on the number and type of street lights and based on Southern California Edison Company's electricity rates for street lights. Immediately upon the energizing of the street lights, those street lights will become a part of the work program of the District. 2 P148 Section 2 -Estimate of Costs and Expenses: The majority of the budgeted operating costs for SLD #6 are for electric utility charges for the street lights and traffic signals within the district. The projected costs to operate and maintain SLD #6 are as follows: Operations & Maintenance Ma intenance a nd Operations $1, 000.00 Equipment Maintenance $400.00 Contract Services $8,340.00 Electric Utilities $191,940.00 Assessment Administration $5,350.00 Ad min/General Overhead $9,080.00 Total SLD #6 Expenditure Budget $216,110.00 Contribution to Reserves -$93,070.00 Estimate of Costs & Expenses: $123,040.00 Total EDU Assessment Rate per EDU/Acre 2,393.77 $51.40 3 P149 Section 3 -Method of Assessment Apportionment: A. General The 1972 Act permits the establishment of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include construction, maintenance and servicing of public lights, landscaping and appurtenant facilities. The 1972 Act further requires that the cost of these improvements be levied according to special benefit to the assessed properties, rather than the assessed value of said properties: " The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements. " The formula used for calculating assessments in the District therefore reflects the composition of the parcels, and the improvements and services provided, to fairly apportion the costs based on the special benefit received by each assessed parcel. B. Assessment Methodology Equivalent Dwelling Units: To assess benefits equitably, it is necessary to relate the different types of parcel improvements to each other. The Equivalent Dwelling Unit method of apportionment uses the single-family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single family home equals one Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU). Every other land-use is converted to EDU's based on an assessment formula that equates the property's specific development status, type of development (land-use), and size of the property, as compared to asingle-family home (SFR). The EDU method of apportioning benefit is typically seen as the most appropriate and equitable assessment methodology for calculating benefit in districts formed under the 1972 Act, as the benefit to each parcel from improvements are apportioned as a function of land-use type, size and development. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land-use types to determine each parcel's EDU. LAND-USE/EQUIVALENT DWELLING UNITS Property Type EDU Va Commercial/Industrial 1.00 Vacant 2.00 Single Family Residential 1.00 Multi-Family Residential 1.00 Multi Acres Acres Unit Unit 4 P150 The following table summarizes the assessment rate for the district: Land Use Type Assessment Rate Commercial/Industrial $51.40/Acre The assessment rate is derived by dividing the total number of EDU within the District by the Total Estimate of Costs ($123,040.00/2,393.77=$51.40). C. Assessment All assessed lots or parcels within the District are listed on the assessment role, which is on file in the office of the City Clerk and the City Engineer, and are hereby made a part of this Engineer's Report, by reference. The assessment roll states the net amount to be assessed upon all assessable lands within the District for Fiscal Year 2009/10, and describes each assessable lot or parcel of land within the District. These lots and parcels are more particularly described on the County assessment Roll, which is on file in the office of the San Bernardino County Assessor and by reference is made a part of this Engineer's Report. 5 P151 Section 4 -Annexations: Calendar Year 2008 Annexations Street Light Maintenance District No. 6 PROJECT DRC2005-00287 TR17818 DRC2006-00692 DRC2005-00831 DRC2008-00357 DRC2006-00866 TR18994 UNITS ANNEX DATE 1.69 AC 1/16/2008 6.97 AC 1/16/2008 1.93 AC fi~18/2008 1.09 AC 820/2008 0.19 AC 1 CY15/2008 30.41 AC 11/19/2008 5.47 AC 12/3/2006 6 P15~ CD ~ w ~~ 1 T ' ~~ A .y ~ ~o O -c J ~ Q C U cA ~ o V ° ~ ~ r~x~ ~~ ~ J ~ o _ 1 .._.._.. ~ N ~ ~ c ~i .+ o L+ ~ ~ m ~ ' ! ~ L ~ m O O 1 U_ Q ~F.+ ny ~Se~ cn .=, j ~ J ~ ny epuenni}~ ~ ny epueMl~~ ~ j ~ ~ ,~ ~8 ~aaJ~ ea ~ ~.._.._.._.._.._.._..- i ~ ny Ja~sa yoo~ ny Ja~sayao~ r"' _.._.._. .._ i .. ,~ ny ua~{!II!W ~ ntl ua~l!II!W ny uaneH ny uaneH ny esowJaH ny esowJaH ny pleq!yoJb' nt/ pleQ!yoJd ~ ny uewllaH ny uewilaH ~ L L ~ ny pJe~(auln ~S UEIIaUJe'J nEe~E~`.'~_$~ ~~p~ °~°§~ , ~ _ _ _ ny anoJ~ a ~ ~ p e9.SQe~efl -.sg~pg9F~E~ =,,. '_ E e U ~~//~~ N Vl W ~~/ 4. VJ a g_ Y p iy ~~2'g~~~Ea E6 ~ O ~ O ~ ;F°' g3 g _ ~ ~ C (~ m V_ $a!$~~E$~F~y .E~tr. o~ to C (6 n~ DE d~-p~"-a ~g ~9 ~gE~ ~n ~ -_ ~~ << m g~~~ieg9g~a~ -E Pi+a EF~~•Y~g a~p~~Y_~a-iB SO `e`z =~~ ~ ~Iy L+ Y T EzF-°~a xec ~ U 9 Ptf:~:f~~~:= P153 Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2009/2010 City of Rancho Cucamonga Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 7 (North Etiwanda) P154 ENGINEER'S REPORT AFFIDAVIT Rancho Cucamonga Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 7 (North Etiwanda) City of Rancho Cucamonga San Bernardino County, State of California This Report describes the District and all relevant zones therein including the improvements, budgets, parcels and assessments to be levied for Fiscal Year 2009/10, as they existed at the time of the passage of the Resolution of Intention. Reference is hereby made to the San Bernardino County assessor's maps for a detailed description of the lines and dimensions of parcels within the District. The undersigned respectively submits the enclosed Report as directed by the City Council. Dated this 3rtl day of J Approved by: Mar t er, Di r of Engineering Services/City Engineer No. C053672 Ezp.6.3D• 1 ] P155 TABLE OF CONTENTS OVERVIEW .................................................................................1 SECTION 1 -DESCRIPTION OF FACILITIES ....................................2 SECTION 2 -ESTIMATE OF COSTS AND EXPENSES ........................3 SECTION 3 -METHOD OF ASSESSMENT APPORTIONMENT............4 A. GENERAL .............................................................................4 B. ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY .............................................4 C. ASSESSMENT .......................................................................4 SECTION - 4 ANNEXATIONS ..........................................................6 SECTION - 5 BOUNDARY MAP .......................................................7 P156 Overview The Fiscal Year 2009/10 Annual Report for Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 7 (North Etiwanda) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 1, Chapter 1, Part 2, Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Street Lighting and Light Act of 1972. "the 1972 Act"). Section 1 Description of Facilities The plans and specifications for improvements maintained by Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 7 ("SLD #7" or the "District") consist of a general description of the nature, location, and the extent of the improvements proposed to be maintained, and are attached hereto. Section - 2 Estimates of Cost and Expenses An estimate of the maintenance cast of the improvements, including incidental costs and expenses in connection therewith for Fiscal Year 2009/10, is set forth on the lists thereof, attached hereto. Section - 3 Method of Assessment Apportionment Discusses the methodology used for calculating assessments in the District. The method reflects the composition of the parcels, and the improvements and services provided, to fairly apportion the costs based on benefit to each parcel. The assessment roll states the net amount to be assessed upon all assessable lands within the District for Fiscal Year 2009/10, and describes each assessable lot or parcel of land within the District. These lots and parcels are more particularly described on the County assessment Roll, which is on file in the office of the San Bernardino County Assessor and by reference is made a part of this Engineer's Report Section - 4 Annexations List the developments, which have annexed to SLD #7 during Calendar year 2008. P157 Section 1 -Description of Facilities: Street Light Maintenance District No. 7 ("SLD #7" or the "District") is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located on local streets in what is termed the North Etiwanda area of the City. Generally, this area encompasses the area of the City east of Day Creek Channel and north of Highland Avenue within the incorporated area of the city. It has been determined that the facilities in this District provide special benefit the properties within this area of the City. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on local streets and traffic signals (or a portion thereof) on local streets within the North Etiwanda area. Typically, street lights are installed by private development as a condition of a development project's approval. Traffic signals can be installed by development or as a City capital improvement project. Historically, the installation of street lights and traffic signals has not been funded with Street Light District funds however, this is permitted under the 1972 Act and the District has, in more recent years, begun funding these costs through the assessment of properties within the District. Any new street lights in areas to be maintained by the District will become part of the active work program at such time as these new areas are annexed into the District. The normal process will be the dedication of the areas to the City, at which time a sufficient non-refundable deposit will be made by the developer to the City. This deposit will provide for costs of energizing and six months of ordinary and usual maintenance, operation and servicing of the street lights in each development at the time of initial operation of the lighting system. Such deposit enables the City to pay for the first six months of operating costs, prior to collecting any assessment monies from the County. The costs will be based on the number and type of street lights and based on Southern California Edison Company's electricity rates for street lights. Immediately upon the energizing of the street lights, those street lights will become a part of the work program of the District. 2 P158 Section 2 -Estimate of Costs and Expenses: The majority of the budgeted operating costs for SLD #7 are for electric utility charges for the street lights and traffic signals within the district. The projected costs to operate and maintain SLD #7 are as follows: FISCAL YEAR 2009/10 ESTIMATED BUDGET $96,310.00 Operations 8~ Maintenance Contract Services Electric Utilities Assessment Administration Admin/Genera I Overhead Interfund Allocation Total SLD #7 Expenditure Budget Estimate of Costs Total EDU Assessment Rate per EDU 3 $ 8,340.00 $19 8,150.00 $17,020.00 $7,030.00 $16,290.00 $246,830.00 -$150,520.0( $96,310.00 2,890.45 $33.32 P159 Section 3 -Method of Assessment Apportionment: A. General The 1972 Act permits the establishment of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include construction, maintenance and servicing of public lights, landscaping and appurtenant facilities. The 1972 Act further requires that the cost of these improvements be levied according to special benefit to the assessed properties, rather than the assessed value of said properties: "The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements. " The formula used for calculating assessments in the District therefore reflects the composition of the parcels, and the improvements and services provided, to fairly apportion the costs based on the special benefit received by each assessed parcel. B. Assessment Methodology Equivalent Dwelling Units: To assess benefits equitably, it is necessary to relate the different types of parcel improvements to each other. The Equivalent Dwelling Unit method of apportionment uses the single-family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single family home equals one Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU). Every other land-use is converted to EDU's based on an assessment formula that equates the property's specific development status, type of development (land-use), and size of the property, as compared to asingle-family home (SFR). The EDU method of apportioning benefit is typically seen as the most appropriate and equitable assessment methodology for calculating benefit in districts formed under the 1972 Act, as the benefit to each parcel from improvements are apportioned as a function of land-use type, size and development. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land-use types to determine each parcel's EDU. LAND-USE/EQUIVALENT DWELLING UNITS Property Type EDU Value Multiplier Commercial/Industrial 2.00 Acres Vacant 2.00 Acres Single Family Residential 1.00 Unit Multi-Family Residential 1.00 Unit 4 P160 The following table summarizes the assessment rate for the district: Land Use Type Assessment Rate Single Family $33.32/SFD The assessment rate is derived by dividing the total number of EDU within the District by the Total Estimate of Costs ($96,310.00/2,890.45=$33.32). C. Assessment All assessed lots or parcels within the District are listed on the assessment role, which is on file in the office of the City Clerk and the City Engineer, and are hereby made a part of this Engineer's Report, by reference. The assessment roll states the net amount to be assessed upon all assessable lands within the District for Fiscal Year 2009/10, and describes each assessable lot or parcel of land within the District. These lots and parcels are more particularly described on the County assessment Roll, which is on file in the office of the San Bernardino County Assessor and by reference is made a part of this Engineer's Report. 5 P161 Section 4 -Annexations: Calendar Year 2008 Annexations Street Light Maintenance District No. 7 PROJECT, UNITS ANNEX DATE 13254 BANYAN AVE 1 SFR 7/162008 6 P16~ +r = ~ N • y y~ y E r Q w ~ Q ~ U ~ N v N ~ ~xy~ ~ ~ ~ J G ~ ~ N `I~1 ~ C J _ m ~ p • ~ 3 m ~ o r 0 ~i Q •f.r .~ J ny epuenn!;3 Y.r i ny ~alsayooa ny ua~!p!W ^d ua~l!II!W ny uaneH ny uaneH ny esow~aH ny esow~aH nV Pte4!yo~V nb Ple4!yo~V ny uewllaH ny uewllaH 7S uellawe~ ~~gg~g@sg~~`_'a€ e€ a$ f E a~~ ~~ y @@ jg 5 yy g py g i5g g~° n~ ae ~ ~~-a~~° `as i..~ v ._ ~ t ;~;~~ ~49~E~~S ~ ~_.._.. ._..~•~ o~ N l.._.._ _. ,.., ~ ti ~ O N p gg p 6i~BB:3 g~~~3 m ¢ eF_~i$~~'g: ~ 0: C ~ N ~, LL B sa & ;°o Y~id~i °€aa a ~ N m ~ C EI ~- ~ ~~ F B ~ 4~i ~ _ : z 4~ 3 of S ~ag $$-E°~$° &dd~ Q ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~8 5 g e~3p @E ~ C.J ~ ~a &~@a ~.~e _.._.._ i nb' ~se3 in ~ ® v ny ~a~sayooa r"- i i i i i i i i i i i ~c ~ •• ~ ~ .~ L L V ~ i ny p~e~(au!n ' ••~' in ~ m ~ ny anal in ,. •~' L J - L P163 Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2009/2010 City of Rancho Cucamonga Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 8 (South Etiwanda) P164 ENGINEER'S REPORT AFFIDAVIT Rancho Cucamonga Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 8 (South Etiwanda) City of Rancho Cucamonga San Bernardino County, State of California This Report describes the District and all relevant zones therein including the improvements, budgets, parcels and assessments to be levied for Fiscal Year 2009/10, as they existed at the time of the passage of the Resolution of Intention. Reference is hereby made to the San Bernardino County assessor's maps for a detailed description of the lines and dimensions of parcels within the District. The undersigned respectively submits the enclosed Report as directed by the City Council. Dated this 3`d day of June, 2009 Approved by: Mark S Dire r`8- f Engineering Services/City Engineer No. C053572 ' Exp. E30-1 1 2 P165 TABLE OF CONTENTS OVERVIEW .................................................................................1 SECTION 1 -DESCRIPTION OF FACILITIES ....................................2 SECTION 2 -ESTIMATE OF COSTS AND EXPENSES ........................3 SECTION 3 -METHOD OF ASSESSMENT APPORTIONMENT............4 A. GENERAL .............................................................................4 B. ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY .............................................4 C. ASSESSMENT .......................................................................4 SECTION - 4 ANNEXATIONS ..........................................................6 SECTION - 5 BOUNDARY MAP .......................................................7 P166 Overview The Fiscal Year 2009/10 Annual Report for Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 8 (South Etiwanda) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 1, Chapter 1, Part 2, Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Street Lighting and Light Act of 1972, "the 1972 Act"). Section 1 Description of Facilities The plans and specifications for improvements maintained by Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 8 ("SLD #8" or the "District") consist of a general description of the nature, location, and the extent of the improvements proposed to be maintained, and are attached hereto. Section - 2 Estimates of Cost and Expenses An estimate of the maintenance cost of the improvements, including incidental costs and expenses in connection therewith for Fiscal Year 2009!10, is set forth on the lists thereof, attached hereto. Section - 3 Method of Assessment Apportionment Discusses the methodology used for calculating assessments in the District. The method reflects the composition of the parcels, and the improvements and services provided, to fairly apportion the costs based on benefit to each parcel. The assessment roll states the net amount to be assessed upon all assessable lands within the District for Fiscal Year 2009/10, and describes each assessable lot or parcel of land within the District. These lots and parcels are more particularly described on the County assessment Roll, which is on file in the office of the San Bernardino County Assessor and by reference is made a part of this Engineer's Report Section - 4 Annexations List the developments, which have annexed to SLD #8 during Calendar year 2008. P167 Section 1 -Description of Facilities: Street Light Maintenance District No. 8 ("SLD #8" or the "District") is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located on local streets in what is termed the South Etiwanda area of the City. Generally, this area encompasses the area of the City east of Etiwanda Avenue, north of Foothill Boulevard and south of Highland Avenue within the incorporated area of the City. It has been determined that the facilities in this District provide special benefit the properties within this area of the City. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on local streets and traffic signals (or a portion thereof) on local streets within the South Etiwanda area. Typically, street lights are installed by private development as a condition of a development project's approval. Traffic signals can be installed by development or as a City capital improvement project. Historically, the installation of street lights and traffic signals has not been funded with Street Light District funds however, this is permitted under the 1972 Act and the District has, in more recent years, begun funding these costs through the assessment of properties within the District. Any new street lights in areas to be maintained by the District will become part of the active work program at such time as these new areas are annexed into the District. The normal process will be the dedication of the areas to the City, at which time a sufficient non-refundable deposit will be made by the developer to the City. This deposit will provide for costs of energizing and six months of ordinary and usual maintenance, operation and servicing of the street lights in each development at the time of initial operation of the lighting system. Such deposit enables the City to pay for the first six months of operating costs, prior to collecting any assessment monies from the County. The costs will be based on the number and type of street lights and based on Southern California Edison Company's electricity rates for street lights. Immediately upon the energizing of the street lights, those street lights will become a part of the work program of the District. 2 P168 Section 2 -Estimate of Costs and Expenses: The majority of the budgeted operating costs for SLD #8 are for electric utility charges for the street lights and traffic signals within the district. The projected costs to operate and maintain SLD #8 are as follows: FISCAL YEAR 2009110 ESTIMATED BUDGET $376,850.00 Operations Contract Services Electric Utilities Assessment Administration Adm in /Genera I Overhe ad I nterFund Allocatio n Total SLD #8 Expenditure Budget Contribution to Reserves Estimate of Costs & Expenses: Total EDU Assessment Rate per EDU $8, 340.0 0 $105, 020.0 0 $9, 300.00 $28, 930.00 $16,290.00 $167, 880.0 0 $208,970.00 $376, 850.00 1.945.00 $193.7 5 3 P169 Section 3 -Method of Assessment Apportionment: A. General The 1972 Act permits the establishment of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include construction, maintenance and servicing of public lights, landscaping and appurtenant facilities. The 1972 Act further requires that the cost of these improvements be levied according to special benefit to the assessed properties, rather than the assessed value of said properties: "The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements. " The formula used for calculating assessments in the District therefore reflects the composition of the parcels, and the improvements and services provided, to fairly apportion the costs based on the special benefit received by each assessed parcel. B. Assessment Methodology Equivalent Dwelling Units: To assess benefits equitably, it is necessary to relate the different types of parcel improvements to each other. The Equivalent Dwelling Unit method of apportionment uses the single-family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single family home equals one Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU). Every other land-use is converted to EDU's based on an assessment formula that equates the property's specific development status, type of development (land-use), and size of the property, as compared to asingle-family home (SFR). The EDU method of apportioning benefit is typically seen as the most appropriate and equitable assessment methodology for calculating benefit in districts formed under the 1972 Act, as the benefit to each parcel from improvements are apportioned as a function of land-use type, size and development. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land-use types to determine each parcel's EDU. LAND-USE/EQUIVALENT DWELLING UNITS EDU Value Multi Multi-Family Residential 1.00 Unit Single Family Residential 1.00 Unit Commercial/Industrial 2.00 Acre Vacant 2.00 Acre 4 P 170 The following table summarizes the assessment rate for the district: Land Use Type Assessment Rate Single Family $193.75/SFD The assessment rate is derived by dividing the total number of EDU within the District by the Total Estimate of Costs ($376,850.00/1,945.00=$193.75). C. Assessment All assessed lots or parcels within the District are listed on the assessment role, which is on file in the office of the City Clerk and the City Engineer, and are hereby made a part of this Engineer's Report, by reference. The assessment roll states the net amount to be assessed upon all assessable lands within the District for Fiscal Year 2009/10, and describes each assessable lot or parcel of land within the District. These lots and parcels are more particularly described on the County assessment Roll, which is on file in the office of the San Bernardino County Assessor and by reference is made a part of this Engineer's Report. 5 P171 Section 4 -Annexations: Calendar Year 2008 Annexations Street Light Maintenance District No. 8 PROJECT UNITS ANNEX DATE TR17919 50 SFR 7/16/2008 P17~ ~ V ~ 'i w ".i y ~ ~ ~ w o J ~ U (A in ~ c V ~ ~ ~ ~~X 0 ~ N J .~'y / ,V ~ o .._.._.._.._ ~ N C 1 'N I c i4i o ~ r J _ fL ~ ! ip "' O 5 m O G 1 ti Q _ ~ _.._.._ i nV lse3 v~ fw 1 ~~~ j i L_ d J i ny epuenn!33 ® ny epuein!33 +r i ~ i yr ~8 >laa~~ ea y ~.._.._.._.._.._.._..- i ~ ny ~aFsayooa ny ~alsayooa r"' i ny ua~!II!W ~ .._.._.._..- i' ny ua~!II!W i i ny uaneH ; ny uaneH 1 i ny esow~aH j i ny esow~aH ^b Pleq!yo~y . 1 nb' Pleq!yo~b' ! ny uewllaH i ny uewllaH .•~~• .r I ~ i~ L V I nH P~elau!n I i§e°PiSi •`dc . . g E j '»~ ..~ ~fi sgss n: s" I . ~ ~ * t. ~•-• , §`I`€L~rai~F e ; a 1.._.._ ._.. ny anal S; flFyog y, rn .......1.._.._ _.._...• m o o w rd i:3 m a £ ~ ~ ~ m ~ Q ~ £! v ag j$ € ~b9 C L l n[i E 4; c~ ii pp e'S m Sg` Yl o~ 2 bF e i §pU gE-~§ ~ V r ~S 3! I p '~< £ . v ~~€8 Ff °_ .- U ~s~:l?~ %1ii RANCHO Cucnrtoecn StaffReport DATE: June 03. 2009 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: John R. Gillison, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Servic~s~~\` BY: Ingrid Y. Bruce, GIS/Special Districts Manager '~ SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION TO APPROVE THE RESOLUTIONS TO ACCEPT THE PRELIMINARY ENGINEER'S REPORTS AND ANNOUNCING THE CITY COUNCIL'S INTENTION TO COLLECT ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS WITHIN LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO'S. 1, 2, 3A, 3B, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 AND 10 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2009/10. NO INCREASE OF ASSESSMENT RATE [S PROPOSED. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council approve the Resolutions accepting the Engineer's Reports and setting the Public Hearing for June 17, 2009 to levy the annual assessments for Landscape Maintenance District No's. ], 2, 3A, 3B, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10. There is no increase to the current rates in these districts for Fiscal Year 2009/2010. The Engineer's Reports are on file in the City Clerk's Office. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: Each year, the City places on the County Tax Roll eleven (11) Landscape Maintenance Districts and the assessments received for each of these Districts are utilized for the maintenance and operation of park and landscaping facilities therein. Said maintenance and operation includes but is not limited to: turf, ground cover, planter beds, shrubs, plants and trees, landscape lighting, irrigation systems, electrical energy for irrigation controllers, insect /disease control, graffiti removal, hardscapes, entry signs, sound walls and all associated appurtenant facilities. The City utilizes prior year carryovers along with current year revenues to meet the districts annual expenses. It has been determined, as stated in the Landscape Maintenance Districts Fiscal Year 2009/2010 Engineer's Reports that the assessment rates remain unchanged from the previous fiscal year 2008/2009 rates. The assessment rates and districts description for each of the Landscape Maintenance Districts is as follows: CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS June 03, 2009 Page 3 Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 assessments pay for the on-going maintenance of parkways. The current assessment rate is $92.21 per single-family residence, and the multi- family is $46.11 per dwelling unit. Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 assessments pay for the on-going maintenance of parkways, paseos and an equestrian trail within the Victoria Planned Community. The current assessment rate is $422.00 per single-family residence. The commercial rate is $844.00 per acre, and the vacant rate is $105.50 per acre. Landscape Maintenance District No. 3A assessments pay for the on-going maintenance of parkways on Hyssop Drive. The current assessment rate is $4li.74 per acre for commercial property. Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B assessments pay for the on-going maintenance of pazkways within the commercial and industrial area of the City. The current assessment rate is $352.80 per acre for commercial property. Landscape Maintenance District No. 4 assessments pay for the on-going maintenancc of parkways, paseos and parks within the Terra Vista Planned Community. The current assessment rate is $252.50 per single-family residence, senior apartments rate is 148.36 per unit and the multi-family rate is $222.00 per dwelling unit. The commercial rate is $382.99 per acre, and the vacant rate is $37.12 per acre. Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 assessments pay for the on-going maintenance of a Tot Lot located on the southwest comer of Andover Place and Bedford Drive. The current assessment rate is $113.29 per single-family residence. Landscape Maintenance District No. 6 assessments pay for the on-going maintenance of pazkways and paseos within the Caryn Planned Community. The current assessment rate is $246.97 per single-family residence. Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 assessments pay for the on-going maintenance of parkways and paseos within the Etiwanda Highlands Community. The current assessment rate is $307.05 per single-family residence. Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 assessments pay for the on-going maintenance of parkways in South Etiwanda. The current assessment rate is $151.45 per single-family residence. Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 assessments pay for the on-going maintenance of parkways in South Etiwanda. The current assessment rate is $387.94 per single-family residence. P174 -2- CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS June 03, 2009 Page 3 Landscape Maintenance District No. 10 assessments pay for the on-going maintenance of parkways in the future University Crest Project. The current assessment rate is $616.20 per single-family residence and $1,232.40 per acre for commercial property. City staff is also reviewing whether a potential voter approval Proposition 2 ] 8 rate increase may be needed for several of the existing landscape maintenance districts for fiscal year 2010/2011. If so, a sepazate item will be brought to the City Council for review and discussion in the near future. Attachments: Resolutions Engineer's Reports P175 -3- P176 RESOLUTION NO. (' 9- O ~ 7 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, FOR APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S ANNUAL REPORTS FOR LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I, 2, 3A, 3B, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 AND 10 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2009/10 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby resolve that: WHEREAS, pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 (the "Act") ,the City Engineer is required to make and file with the City Clerk of said City an annual report ("Report") in writing for which assessments are to be levied and collected to pay the costs of the maintenance and/or improvement of said Landscape Maintenance District Nos. 1, 2, 3A, 3B, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10 (the "Districts"); and WHEREAS, the City Engineer has made and filed with the City Clerk of said City, Reports in writing as called for pursuant to said Act, which Reports have been presented to this Council for consideration; and WHEREAS, said City Council has duly considered each Report and each and every part thereof, and finds that each and every part of said Reports are sufficient, and that said Reports, should not be modified in any respect. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council ofthe City ofRancho Cucamonga does hereby order as follows: That the Engineer's Estimate of the itemized costs and expenses of said work and of the incidental expenses in connection therewith, contained in said Reports are hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed. 2. That the diagrams showing the Districts referred to and described in said Reports, and the boundaries of the subdivisions of land within said Districts are hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed. That the proposed assessments upon the subdivisions of land in said Districts in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by said subdivision, respectively, from said work and of the incidental expenses thereof, as contained in said Reports are hereby approved and confirmed. 4. That said Reports shall stand as the City Engineer's Annual Reports for Fiscal Year 2009/10 for the subsequent proceedings. P177 RESOLUTION NO. D q- ~ / A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1, 2, 3A, 3B, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 AND 10 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2009/10, PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972; AND ANNOUNCING A TIME AND PLACE FOR A PUBLIC HEARING THEREON WHEREAS, the City Council of the City ofRancho Cucamonga, pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, does resolve as follows: Description of Work SECTION 1: That the public interest and convenience require and it is the intention of this City Council to levy and collect assessments within Landscape Maintenance District Nos. 1, 2, 3A, 3B, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and ] 0 (the "Districts") for Fiscal Year 2009/10 for the maintenance and operation of pazk and landscaping facilities therein. Said maintenance and operation includes but is not limited to: turf, ground cover, planter beds, shrubs, plants and trees, landscape lighting, irrigation systems, electrical energy for irrigation controllers, insect /disease control, graffiti removal, hardscapes, entry signs, sound walls and all associated appurtenant facilities. A description of the specific improvements to be maintained within each District is attached hereto as Exhibit A. Location of Work SECTION 2: The foregoing described work is located within the roadway rights-of--way and easements enumerated in the and more particularly described on maps that are on file in the City Clerk's office, entit]ed "Assessment Diagrams, Landscape Maintenance District Nos. 1, 2, 3A, 3B, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10." Description of Districts SECTION 3: That the contemplated work, in the opinion of said City Council, is of more than local or general public benefit, and said City Council hereby makes the expense of the work chargeable upon the Districts, which said Districts are assessed to pay the costs and expenses thereof, and which Districts are described as follows: All that certain territory of the City of Rancho Cucamonga included within the exterior boundary lines shown upon that certain "Map of Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 ", "Map of Landscape Maintenance District No. 2", "Map of Landscape Maintenance District No. 3A", "Map of Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B", "Map of Landscape Maintenance District No. 4", "Map of Landscape Maintenance District No. 5", "Map of Landscape Maintenance District No. 6", "Map of Landscape Maintenance District No. 7", "Map of Landscape Maintenance District No. 8", "Map of Landscape Maintenance District No. 9", and "Map of Landscape Maintenance District No. 10", indicating by said P178 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS June 3, 2009 Page 2 boundary lines the extent of the territory included within each District. Facsimiles of said maps are attached hereto as Exhibit B. The actual maps are on file in the Office of the City Clerk of said City. Reference is hereby made to said maps for further, full and more particular description of said Districts, and the maps so on file shall govern for all details as to the extent of said Districts. Reports of Engineer SECTION 4: The City Council of said City by Resolution No. approved the Reports of the City Engineer, which Reports indicate the amount of the proposed assessments, the District boundazies, any assessment zones therein, and the method of assessment. The Reports, titled "Annual Engineer's Report", are on file in the office of the City Clerk of said City. Reference to said Reports is hereby made for all particulars for the amount and extent ofthe assessments and for the extent ofthe work. A listing of the assessment rate and method of apportionment for each District is attached hereto as Exhibit C. Please refer to the Reports for a full and complete description of the assessment rate and method of apportionment within each District. Time and Place of Public Hearing SECTION 5: Notice is hereby given that a Public Hearing is hereby scheduled in the Civic Center Council Chambers, 10500 Civic Center Drive, City of Rancho Cucamonga, Califomia, 91730. WEDNESDAY, June 17, 2009, AT 7:00 P.M. Any and all persons may appear and show cause why said maintenance and service for the existing improvements and any proposed improvements should not be done or tamed out or why assessments should not be levied and collected for Fiscal Year 2009/10. Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 SECTION 6: All the work herein proposed shall be done and carried through pursuant to an act of the legislature of the State of California designated as the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Part 2 of Division I S of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of Califomia. Publication of Resolution of Intention SECTION 7: Published notice shall be made pursuantto Section 6061 ofthe Government Code. The Mayor shall sign this Resolution and the City Clerk shall attest to the same, and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published once, at least ] 0 days before the date set for the hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario; California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. P179 APPENDIX A The following pages contain descriptions of the improvements to be maintained within each of the eleven Districts. Please refer to the annual reports of the City Engineer (the "Reports") for a full and complete description of the maintenance items within each District. LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 Maintenance Items: Landscaping: Parkways (includes turf and ground cover) Median Islands (includes turf and ground cover) Paseos Street Trees Entry Monuments Community Trails Pazks (Pazks within LMD No. 1 include: Bear Gulch Park, East and West Beryl Park, Old Town Park, Church Street Park, Golden Oaks Park, Heritage Community Park, Hermosa Park, Red Hill Community Park, Lions Park, Napa Park, Don TiburcioTapia Park and the Rancho Cucamonga Adult Sports Complex) LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 Maintenance Items: Landscaping: Parkways (includes turf and ground cover) Median Islands (includes turf and ground cover) Paseos Street Trees Community Trails Parks (Parks within LMD No. 2 include: Kenyon Park, Windrows Park, Ellena Pazk, Vintage Park, Victoria Groves Park and Victoria Arbors Pazk) LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3A Maintenance Items: Landscaping: Parkways (includes ground cover only) P180 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0.3B Maintenance Items: Landscaping: Parkways (includes turf and ground cover) Median Islands (includes turf and ground cover) Street Trees Entry Monuments LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.4 Maintenance Items: Landscaping: Parkways (includes turf and ground cover) Median Islands (includes turf and ground cover) Paseos Street Trees Parks (Parks within LMD No. 4 include: Spruce Park, Mountain View Park, Ralph M. Lewis Park, Coyote Canyon Park, Milliken Park and West Greenway Pazk) LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.S Maintenance Items: Landscaping: Tot Lot at Andover and Bedford (includes ground cover only) LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.6 Maintenance Items: Landscaping: Parkways (includes turf and ground cover) Median Islands (includes turf and ground cover) Paseos Street Trees Community Trails P181 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 7 Maintenance Items: Landscaping: Parkways (includes turf and ground cover) Median Islands (includes turf and ground cover) Paseos Street Trees Community Trails Parks (Pazks within LMD No. 7 include: Etiwanda Creek Community Park) LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 8 Maintenance Items: Landscaping: Parkways (includes turf and ground cover) Median Islands (includes turf and ground cover) Paseos Street Trees Community Trails LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 9 Maintenance Items: Landscaping: Parkways (includes turf and ground cover) Median Islands (includes turf and ground cover) Street Trees Parks (Parks within LMD No. 9 include: South Etiwanda Pazk) LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 10 Maintenance Items: Landscaping: Pazkways (includes turf and ground cover) Median Islands (includes turf and ground cover) Street Trees Community Trails Parks (Parks within LMD No. 10 include: Day Creek Park) P182 APENDIX B The following pages contain the boundary maps for each of the eleven Districts. P 18; ~ ~, *.. V . r w • .y E ~ o ~ ~ ~ Q ~ C _ U ~ ~n o V ° ~ ~ r"~ N ~ •~ ~ J O .. _.._.._.._ ~ ~ N 1 ~ ~ ~4 .I ~ c o ~ ~ J 0] ~ / ~ N L m O O 1 LL Q ~ ~ ny ~se3 in Q i ~ ~ ~ V ~ ny epuenn!;3 ® ny epuenn!~3 ~ ~ ~ ~8 ~ aa~~ ea .I ~.._.._.._.._.._. ._.._ i ~ ny ~a~sa yoo~ ny as}sayoo~ r' ~.. ny ua~!II!W ~ _.._.._.._. i ny ua~l!II!W ny uaneH ny uaneH ny esow~aH ny esowaaH nd Pleq!yo~d ^b pleq!yo~y ~ ny uewllaH ny uewllaH ~ t L_ ~ n y p~e~(au !n ~9gq A"q g'n°`~ g°~E Eso4 Y_>a ='s R~° ~'~`~ agEa oaL g~A-_A ~ ny anoa~ ~'~~F=e~~° ~ _ m ~N_y LL ~ Q -„PaL~€Yr:a5 c L J = ~ 3 y '~°~~BF¢2S35fl .a t ~ ~ t ~ ~ ~ xg. _ ~~r€e :EBB=° ' '~ ~ o Q v~_ - g a . ~ ~ "`a ~; te" "€oB In (~ k9~ic~~"~-~ ~n ~ -_ _ m 7uuycoQ4y gft - -e p akSQaY=2`a;~ << C, x~ &o op °CrE ~s_Ex ?=raae~ - _-- P18~ N ~ ~~ V .~ .y J o ~ _ ~ ~ U J ~ Q~ ~ ~ o V ~ ~ r.~ _ ~ ti ~ ~ J o .._ .._.._.._ cV 1 ~ ~ ~i `~ ~ c_ o r J 07 ~ '~ i ~ - 3 i m o 0 ~ Q Q~ I _.._.._ I ny ~Se~ [n I ~ ~ _ V ~ ny epuennl}3 ~ ny epuennl~~ i ~ i . 8 ~{ ~ ~ aa~~ ea .._. .I ._.._.._.._.._.._ i ~ ny ~a~sayoo~ ny aa~sayoo~ r"- ~.._ ny ua~iIIIW i i .._.._.._. ny ua~{!II!W i i i ny uaneH ; i ny uaneH i ny esow~aH i ~ ny esouaaaH i ny plegiya~y . ny pleq!yo~b' i i ny ueuallaH i ~~. '~ ny ueu~IlaH •• L ~ .~ ~_ ~ ~ ~ ny pae~(au ln i ~S ueilau~e~ ~ -. ,-- ~IDA;~rAtq_n= t ~._.._~ ~ .._..~•-: ~, nyano~~ A~aEYsgQ=has '~ ~ _ _ " e s ~ •' ~ _ ~ _ ~ L p e `n £; r$ oa~VSg~g S~'°~ . C m ~ =~"tea"aa A~'R ~ j, '~ C 5'q~~~",,."~"q q~'~s"g I'=a~3~ fn (6 ~8~~~~~~tg ~B - i < m guox" E a~ .sFa a s $ A z ~o a r~~ aga ° € Eo_ -'3 a :VUO °r~~d~x P18E Q M ~~ V N ~~ ~ a •F J Q ~' Q ~ . . = U ~ o ~ y ~ r•~' V ~ J ~ o ._ ._.._.._.._ .n N ~ ~ 6 C /\ n J _ m O y ~ ! . i a, r 3 0 ~ m o i 6 6° ¢ _.._ ~~ i ny lse3 in ~ ! i L Q i ® v ~ i ny epuennil~ ny epueMi~3 V i a ~ ~8 ~aa~~ ea J ny ~a~sayooy ny ~alsay~oa ~._ i .._.._.._..- ny ua~iplW ~ i ny ua~!II!W i i ny uaneH ; 6 ny uaneH i ny esow~aH i i ny esow~aH nV Pleglyo~y ; nH Pleq!yo~H ! ny uewllaH i ~ ny uewllaH ~~~ •.~ '• ~ i ~ L .o r ~ i ny p~eRauln 1S uepawe~ ~ g a •~ _.: F [:eE i '0 f t °• as a•~683` ; ~ ~.._.._.. ~ ~ .._..~ nyana~ ~ p~~~€Ogza s i .0 (~ N O Q sg ~ ~ g ~ ' O C 6@ n` €~2ad$n ~' m ~9i Al g~8~: a p ~ g kg~ >~~~E ~~ a s E agg~n8 U fsF': i?r i~~~e P18E m M ~ ~, V ~' .~ ~~ m ~r J ~ A 0 • ~ o Q ~ ~ ~ ~ ~, ~ ~~~ o J .~~ ~ o .._ .._.. ~ N ~ ~ ~ ^ ~ C o W ~ J m ~ ~ ~ ~ L •~ ~ ~N ~ p 1 ~ Q ~ ny ~se3 ~ v ~ ~ ny epuenn!~3 ~ ny epuenn!~3 ~ ~ ~ ~9 ~ aaa~ ea J ~ ny aa~sa yao~ ny ~a~sayoo~{ ~.._ ny ua~{!II!W ~ .._.._.._.._. i ny ua~l!II!W ny uaneH ny uaneH ny esow~aH ny esoua~aH ny PIeQ!yoa`d nt{ pieQ!yoad ~ ny ueuallaH ny ueuallaH ~ L L V ny pae~(au! n ~S ueilawe~ o~eE~-;q~A~- ` q`~`°D`;~E p aggo o~B ~~~F_ + ~'oav ES c9 pA ~ ~ ~ O ~ may= vo-°z?s ~ ~' C 07 ~ ~ _'°~ ?~a~~° a T .~u~ SACq Y,r y'es` &~e~~KgnE~yo ~ p Z = AFFe M~p°.°L~ 3 x~ Ers~~ro.e"~ ' ~ gi . ~A~da~~; n . i P187 ~' a~ w ~~ V .~ .y ~ o w ~ ~ ~ Q U C ~n ~ y o V o ~ ~..~ ~ ~ J ~~~ ~ ~ o .._.._.. _ ~ c~ 1 ~ ~ ~ o C ~ :~ m ~ ~ ~ r 3 m ~ 1 li Q ~ ~ _.._.._ i ny ~Se~ ~ ~ ! i !~ i ~ v y i ny epueMq~ ny epuenn!~3 ~ ~ ep J X18 ~{aa~~ .._.. _ .. ' ~ ny aa~sayoo~ ny ~a~sayoo~{ r"' i ~.._.._.._.._. ny ua~{!II!W 1 nd ua~1!II!W I I ny uaneH ; I ny uaneH i ~ ny esou~~al-{ j ~ ny esoua~aH i ny pleq!y~~y ; n'd pleQ!y~~d 1 1 ~ "~ ny ueuallaH ny ueuallaH i ~..~~ i ~ L . ~ ny p e~(au!n lS ue!lawe~~ ~eE°=°t°'4r 9 .' gc b n3 c'~V2 a3` ~ ~ ap ~ ` m o a~ sue, - • ~~•' m ~.. i ~~.• ~ J ~ L a~~Lgq~go°58 •' ~ ~ ~ o Q zt~$ ~~ m ~ _ ~ T _«E~~F ~4P~ ~ C AP a~'Fg~ ~gp~ q (n [0 k FF=^' s ~e.~ .2~5g_ ~ U R` m _ ~j = u ~~JI ~_ `gasp- °~~^~°s~ ° • Cif a F~~" "dP=_ P18E ~ _~ v.. =i w "" N ;_ J O Q ..T~ ~ Q ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ 1•x J .~y ~ ~ ~ o . 1 _.._.._.._ -o (L' `~ N Q~ ~ N `FJ C _ O J 0] ~ ! 3 m ~ +, ° i li a` ~ ~ _.._.._ i nV lse~ in Q 1 s j ~ ~ V ~ ny epuenn!~3 ® ny epueM!~3 a c ~ ~9 >l ed aa~~ .. .._.. _ ; ny ~a~sayooy ny ~a~sayooa r"' i ny ua~!IIIW ~ .. i _.._.._.._ ny ua>I!II!W i i ny uaneH ; i i ny uaneH ny esow~aH j i ny esow~aH nH PIe4!yo~b' ; nd PIe9!yo~V i ~ ny uewllaH i ~ ny ~L. •• uewllaH i ~ s ~ 1 ny p~e/auin OC i' ' ~ = 1.._.._ .' ._.. _ _ n`p'anOJ~ sg os~gs •5n ' J ~I~ ,~`s v:== ~ (L C O V_ '343:~E cr: € m g~~nEaE:ca~s S ~~gx P. zo _ 0] = E U iS EIr°aa~'a~6€ = ~ § o~ a 5 a o6 8 aU 83~:a:8e~F:i P189 ~O ~ ~ ~~ V 'i ~" ,y 'O ~ J o U ® Q ~ ~ ~ o c ~ t C ~ J 1.r ° w ~ ~ o i c J D] ~ •_ j ~ ~ 0 3 ° i m ~ a` ~ ~ i •- -. .._inVlse3 in i ® i ~ i v V ny epuenng3 ny epueM93 y '• a i j ea ~ ~e >IaaJ~ _ .._.._ J ny Ja3sayooy ny Ja~sayooy ... i ny ua~!II!W f._.._.._.._ ny ua>I!II!W i 1 i j ny uaneH i ny uaneH i ny esowJaH . ~ ny esowJaH i nb Pley!4oJV j nV PIe9!yoJH i n uew a ~ b II H• . ' ~ ny ~~• .~ uewllaH i ~ ~` ~ v i i ny m pJelau!n ue! awe i 3S I ~. ~5`6 i~eS~~Ss ~ ~~i~iE e~ff ' ; F , aH=6 ~~ =® ~ ~ i~ p& Fe n~2tt `n c8 •~ ~.._..~ .• ~ ...._. ~'Y. nb' anOJ~ ~zeiE~H~ag3 r.._..'~_.._.. .._ .._•~• m N fn .L-. O oD •H ~2a E2a dz~~ 9 T y -p ~ [0 ~ O Q ~ Y Y~~~E p - a ya8 c y a c ~~4°P°~~~$?g~ ~ ~ `~ ~ = m y4a;% Eta $t~` e~~~a a; ~ ~ ~ ~~ r g pp .365e Sg A U =3n$ kz?s&E~i~E°se P19C ~ _~ ~~ ~ 'i " r , J Q 0 y a ~ ~ ~ ~ N ~ V ~ a i a ~ ,..~ ~ ~ m J ~y ~ ~ o !- ~ N W ~ p y~ C O 1- \ J ~] ~ . _ ~ ~ 3 m .. 0 0 fi° ~ _.._.._ i nH lse3 in i = ~ ® v (~ ny epueM!l3 a c J e 4 ~.. .._.._ i ny ~alsayoob ny ~alsayooa r"' i ny ua~!II!W ~ .._.._.._..- i ny ua>t!II!W i i ny uaneH ; i ny uaneH i ny esow~aH j i ny esow~aH ny pleq!y~ay ; i ^d Pleq!yo~H ! ny uewllaH ny uewllaH i I •~~ ~. L s ~ r j ny p~elau ln ~ ~~eo pg:i c-; j 'O t* ~§FSaeafi 3=. '• E 5§~ "g ~/J C .~•' Co ~ ~ eas ESP: n. -a m m o LL Q ~~~. _~~- ` ~° i: ~ c ;F a; ~ 5F 3 : €~ ° '~ N c m ~ C~g x €~°8 ~5F=P•a € 4 y 5 d~ • Pe oc3 = PP[ N~~Sfp ~ ~°F£gexF~c.? 4L U ?i?e Bgz?E~jz P19' N N y r ~ ~n / ~ V 'i y/.~. v, J 0 Q ~ Q CJ ~ C ~ a ~ c N N C1 y, C ~ J ti.C o ~ i ~ ~ ,~, C ' ~ ~ m ~ ' I ~ - 3 ~ m 0 ° S~ '~ a i ~ i _.._ .._inHlse3 in ! ® i = v ~ i ~ ny epuenn93 ny epuenng~ h c ea ~ ~9 >IaaJ~ _ . J ._.._..~ . ny Jalsayoob ny Jalsayoob i ny ua~!II!W f._.._.._.._ i nF/ ua~l!II!W i i i ny uaneH j ny uaneH i ny esowJaH . ny esowJaH i nV Pleq!yoJH j nb Pleq!yoJV i ny uewllaH ! ~• ° ~ ny uewllaH ~ '.. ,•, L L ~ ny pJe~tau!n g6~i pE:i•5=c 15 J. Ec•M12F '~ ..%'~~ ..i ~. ._ t 'F~Sa~P~°f: 8 '~~6 9sp °0 ~ ~ ~ faaffrfr ~ m ~ 'v m o ~ Q @a~l5 s Y d,'5 ~ ~ fA '• f0 s~ °~~~e{Ppi9goo P°E2 ~:~ ~ ~ -_ m p f ~ p PfeP 35E~na Y P 2 o p g?e ~~g g~ s U €x~: ~ £~~~~e 3 P19~ w ~~ V 'i ~ ~ p o ~ ~ Q ~ ~ o ~ ~- ~ J tir ~ 1 ~ ~i ~ ~ ~ o ~1.r i c J m ~ ' 1 N m - 3 ~ m o ° •' `a` a` i ~ i _ _.._ inHlse3 in Q ! ® ~ v i ~ ny epuennp3 ny epuennl~3 h ~ a c ~ ~9 ~aa~~ ep. ._.._.. _ J ~ ny ~a~sayooy ny ~aasayoo~{ ~.. i ny ua~!IIIW r._.._.._.._..- ° ny ua~!II!W i i i i ny uaneH j i ny uaneH ny esow~aH ; i ny esowaaH nH Pleq!yay i nV Pleq!yo~V i ny uewllaH ! _ ~ ~ ny uewllaH •' ~ 1 ! r ~ L V ~ ny p~elau!n 3S uepawe~ i .fr€prPisr•E'i Ei€a=~ ~ `"` s s ~ ~' ~ i~ 'Sn~g~ok °t P~~E r.._..r O (Y _ ~.._• "`• ny anal k9 aEkY~YiHY< 7 s 4Ee as4 J - 3 ~ "~t€ ~ ~ o Q d' C D7 LL ~. - .N ~ C e~3 4p€~ ~V ~ m F ~ p Zn M. e ~ das~OE Oi~ E% k ~ ~ ~ ~ s~E k E& . @ E P19c' O v ~ ~~ y N `~ ~ O J Q Q C CJ ~ ~ y ~ r o ~ti J ~ o `~ ~ ~ .._.._.. _.._ ^ ~ v N ` 1 C O /~` ~ J _ m ~ C ! .~ ! N m r o 3 0 1 i nV 1se3 in 1 Q j ® ~ L_ ~ ~ ! ny epuennl~3 ny epuennl~3 V I ~ ~8 ~aa 1 ny ~a~sayooa ny ~a;sayoo~{ r'° i ny ua~iIIIW i .._.._.._..- ny ua>I!II!W i i i ny uaneH ; ny uaneH 1 i ny esow~aH ~ i ny esow~aH nV Pleq!yo~y. nb Pleq!4o~V i ! ny uewllaH i ~ .•/~ ~ ny uewllaH ~ ~ r~ L L v ~ ny p~elau in 7S uellawe~! ~~•!44~Y~=~4 i ~, a ~~ 1..~ ./'~ (n C m d' (n ea~i8~'E~~nE ~ F !a @$ ~E n § v ~ ~ c ~ m li ¢ pp Bg i~§ el• ~~t-s41::6 ~F ~ 2 $ C ~y£, , "~n 6@ g@p{pSp ~ ~ N_ S - 4 m B@ 3 z¢~3 Fi1F {{gg fa ;4~eae'e ~6sE QQQ ~5 F ~ v ~j 2 § ~Fa~a a: sa t9" ~83o ~,'O@ Fe PY~tdFP ;~€! P194 APPENDIX C The following pages show the assessment rate and method of apportionment for each of the eleven Districts. Please refer to the annual reports of the City Engineer (the "Reports") for a full and complete description of the rates and methods of apportionment for each District. LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. I Assessment Rate: $92.21 Assessment Methodology: Equivalent Dwelling Unit ("EDU") Single Family Residential = 1.00 EDU per parcel Multi-Family Residential = 0.50 EDU per dwelling unit Commercial/Industrial = 2.00 EDU per acre Vacant Land = 0.25 EDU per acre LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.2 Assessment Rate: $422.00 Assessment Methodology: Equivalent Dwelling Unit ("EDU") Single Family Residential = 1.00 EDU per parcel Multi-Family Residential = 1.00 EDU per dwelling unit Commercial/Industrial= 2.00 EDU per acre Vacant Land = 0.25 EDU per acre LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3A Assessment Rate: $413.74 Assessment Methodology: Equivalent Dwelling Unit ("EDU") Single Family Residential = 1.00 EDU per parcel Multi-Family Residential = 1.00 EDU per dwelling unit Commercial/Industrial = 1.00 EDU per parcel Vacant Land = 0.25 EDU per acre LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B Assessment Rate: $352.80 Assessment Methodology: Equivalent Dwelling Unit ("EDU") Commercial/Industrial = 1.00 EDU per acre P195 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.4 Assessment Rate: Varies per land-use type (see below) Assessment Methodology: Equivalent Dwelling Unit ("EDU") Single Family Residential = 1.00 EDU per parcel @ a rate of $252.50 Multi-Family Residential = 1.00 EDU per dwelling unit @ a rate of $222.00 Commercial/Industrial = 1.00 EDU per acre @ a rate of $382.99 Senior Housing = 1.00 EDU per dwelling unit @ a rate of $148.36 Vacant Land = 0.25 EDU per acre @ a rate of $37.12 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 5 Assessment Rate: $113.29 Assessment Methodology: Equivalent Dwelling Unit ("EDU") Single Family Residential = 1.00 EDU per parcel LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 6 Assessment Rate: $246.97 Assessment Methodology: Equivalent Dwelling Unit ("EDU") Single Family Residential = 1.00 EDU per parcel LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 7 Assessment Rate: $307.05 Assessment Methodology: Equivalent Dwelling Unit ("EDU") Single Family Residential = 1.00 EDU per pazcel LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 8 Assessment Rate: $151.4 Assessment Methodology: Equivalent Dwelling Unit ("EDU") Single Family Residential = 1.00 EDU per pazcel P196 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 9 Assessment Rate: $387.94 Assessment Methodology: Equivalent Dwelling Unit ("EDU") Single Family Residential = 1.00 EDU per parcel Multi-Family Residential = 1.00 EDU per dwelling unit Commercial/Industrial = 2.00 EDU per acre Vacant Land = 0.25 EDU per acre LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 10 Assessment Rate: $616.20 Assessment Methodology: Equivalent Dwelling Unit ("EDU") Single Family Residential = 1.00 EDU per parcel Commercial/Industrial= 2.00 EDU per acre P197 PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of June 2009. Donald J. Kurth, M.D., Mayor ATTEST: Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk I, JANICE C. REYNOLDS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Califomia, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Califomia, at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the day of June 2009. Executed this day of June 2009, at Rancho Cucamonga, Califomia. Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk P198 Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2009/2010 City of Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 (General City) P199 ENGINEER'S REPORT AFFIDAVIT Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 (General City) City of Rancho Cucamonga San Bernardino County, State of California This Report describes the District and all relevant zones therein including the improvements, budgets, parcels and assessments to be levied for Fiscal Year 2009/10, as they existed at the time of the passage of the Resolution of Intention. Reference is hereby made to the San Bernardino County assessor's maps for a detailed description of the lines and dimensions of parcels within the District. The undersigned respectively submits the enclosed Report as directed by the City Council. Dated this 3~d day of June, 2009 Approved by: Mark Ste~f, Dire~fEngineering Services/City Engineer No. C653672 Enp. 6.36.1 1 P200 TABLE OF CONTENTS OVERVIEW ..............................................................................................1 SECTION 1 -DESCRIPTION OF IMPROVEMENTS :.............................2 SECTION 2 -ESTIMATE OF COSTS AND EXPENSES :......................13 SECTION 3 -METHOD OF ASSESSMENT APPORTIONMENT:.........14 A. GENERAL ........................................................................................14 B. ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY ...........................................................14 C. ASSESSMENT .................................................................................. 15 SECTION 4 -ANNEXATIONS :..............................................................16 SECTION 5 -BOUNDARY MAP ...........................................................17 P201 Overview The Fiscal Year 2009/10 Annual Report for Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 (General City) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 1, Chapter 1, Part 2, Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscape and Light Act of 1972, "the 1972 Act"). Section -1 Description of Improvements The plans and specifications for improvements maintained by Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 ("LMD #1" or the "District") consist of a general description of the nature, location, and the extent of the improvements proposed to be maintained, and are attached hereto. Section - 2 Estimates of Cost and Expenses An estimate of the maintenance cost of the improvements, including incidental costs and expenses in connection therewith for Fiscal Year 2009/10, is set forth on the lists thereof. attached hereto. Section - 3 Method of Assessment Apportionment Discusses the methodology used for calculating assessments in the District. The method reflects the composition of the parcels, and the improvements and services provided, to fairly apportion the costs based on benefit to each parcel. The assessment roll states the net amount to be assessed upon all assessable lands within the District for Fiscal Year 2009/10, and describes each assessable lot or parcel of land within the District. These lots and parcels are more particularly described on the County assessment Roll, which is on file in the office of the San Bernardino County Assessor and by reference is made a part of this Engineer's Report Section - 4 Annexations List the developments, which have annexed to LMD #1 during Calendar year 2008. P202 Section 1 -Description of Improvements: Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 ("LMD #1" or the "District") represents various landscaped areas, parks and community trails located at various sites throughout the City. These sites consist of several non-contiguous areas throughout the City. As such, the parcels within this District do not represent a distinct district area as do the other LMD's within the City. Typically new parcels within this District have been annexed upon development. The various sites maintained by the District consist of parkways, median islands, paseos, street trees, entry monuments, community trails and parks. The 41.5 acres of parks consist of Bear Gulch Park, East and West Beryl Park, Old Town Park, Church Street Park, Golden Oaks Park, Heritage Community Park, Hermosa Park, Red Hill Community Park, Lions Park, Napa Park, Don TiburcioTapia Park and the Rancho Cucamonga Adult Sports Complex) The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows: LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 SITE LOCATIONS June 3. 2009 Site # Descriptive Locations A-1 The north and south side of Wilson from Hellman to Amethyst. Ground Cover area:22,982 square feet A-2 The east side of Hellman from 326 feet south of Pepperidge to 73 feet north of Pepperidge. Ground Cover area: 5,810 square feet A-3 The south side of 19th Street from 62 feet east of Mayberry to 173 feet east of Mayberry. Ground Cover area: 1,680 square feet A-4 The south side of Wilson from Amethyst to Archibald; the planters and cutouts on the west side of Archibald from Wilson to 105 feet south of Cottonwood. Ground Cover area: 5.625 square feet A-5 The north and south side of Diamond Court from Klusman to Diamond Ave. Ground Cover area: 3,143 square feet 2 P203 A-6 The parkway on the north side of Wilson from 348 feet east of Morning Canyon to Alder Ridge. Ground Cover area: 5 700 square feet A-7 The cutouts and vines on the south side of Wilson from the Alta Loma Channel to 240 feet east of Zapata. Ground Cover area: 911 square feet A-8 The east side of Broken Star from 80' south of Highland to Highland; the north side of Highland from Amethyst to Broken Star including wood chip area north of sidewalk, the south side of Highland from Broken Star to Amethyst; the west side of Amethyst from 140 feet south of Highland to 265 feet south of Highland. Ground Cover area:16,870 square feet A-9 The south side of Highland from Hellman to Broken Star. Ground Cover area: 7,865 square feet A-10 The south side of 19th from 170 feet west of Pilgrim to 167 feet east of Pilgrim. Ground Cover area: 1.808 square feet A-11 The east side of Amethyst from Lemon to 230 feet north of Apricot Ground Cover area: 2,115 square feet A-12 The west side of Sapphire from 710 feet north of Hillside to Hillside. Ground Cover area: 4,500 square feet A-13 The south side of Victoria from 110 feet west of London to Ramona. Ground Cover area: 2,705 square feet A-14 The west side of Archibald from 273 feet north of La Gloria to Lemon; the La Gloria median from Archibald to Jadeite; the north and south side of La Gloria from Archibald to 53 feet east of Jadeite; the north side of Lemon from Archibald to 55 feet east of Klusman. Ground Cover area: 12,880 square feet A-15 The planters and cutouts on the east side of Archibald from 610 feet south of Cottonwood to Wilson; the south side of Wilson from Archibald to Alta Loma Channel. Ground Cover area: 2,110 square feet A-16 The cutouts and planters on the east side of Archibald from Banyan to 190 feet north of Sunflower. Ground Cover area: 1,580 square feet 3 P204 A-17 The cutouts and planters on the west side of Archibald from 225 feet south of Wilson to Banyan. Ground Cover area: 2,362 square feet A-18 The cutouts and planters on the north side of Banyan from Jadeite to 410 feet west of Jadeite. Ground Cover area: 216 square feet A-19 The cutouts and planters on the east side of Amethyst from 192 feet south of Sunflower to Manzanita. Ground Cover area: 4,325 square feet A-20 The west side of Archibald from 210 feet north of La Colina to 230 feet south of Almond; the south side of La Colina from Archibald to Jadeite. Ground Cover area: 17,120 square feet A-21 The planter adjacent to the equestrian trail from Riverwood to Raspberry north of the County flood retention basin that is west of Chaffey College. Ground Cover area: 22,832 square feet A-22 The west side of Haven from Carrari to Vista Grove. Ground Cover area:4,572 square feet A-23 The west side of Haven from 434 feet north of Manzanita to 258 feet south of Manzanita. Ground Cover area:48,390 square feet Turf area: 5.868 square feet A-24 The south side of 19th from 286 feet east of Amethyst to 166 feet west of Klusman. Ground Cover area:5,904 square feet A-25 The equestrian trail and planters on the east side of Hermosa from 421 feet south of Whispering Forest to Sun Valley. Ground Cover area:17,529 square feet A-26 The west side of Haven from 630 feet north of Wilson to Wilson; the parkway on the north side of Wilson from Haven to Mayberry; the parkway on the east side of Mayberry from Wilson to 382 feet north of Poplar, and the east and west side of Cartilla from Wilson to Poplar. Ground Cover area: 35,540 square feet A-27 The north side of 19th from Mayberry to 93 feet east of Castle Gate. Ground Cover area: 5,145 square feet 4 P205 A-28 The east side of Hermosa from 360 feet south of Manzanita to Manzanita, and the south side of Manzanita from Hermosa to Raspberry. Ground Cover area: 7,421 square feet A-29 The south side of Wilson from 240 feet west of Timbermist to Hermosa; the west side of Hermosa from Wilson to 213 feet south of Oak Grove. Ground Cover area: 11,184 square feet A-30 The equestrian trail and plant material from the curb to the tract wall on the west side of Hermosa from 118 feet south of Hillside to 160 feet south of Waterford. Ground Cover area: 12,132 square feet A-31 The south side of Lemon from London to Calle Hermosa. Ground Cover area: 4.404 square feet A-32 The north side of Lemon from the Alta Loma Channel to London; the east side of London from Lemon to Cypress. Ground Cover area: 4,463 square feet A-33 The parkway on the east side of London from 158 feet north of Banyan to 310 feet north of Banyan. Ground Cover area:1,029 square feet A-34 The south side of Alta Loma from Mayberry to Revere. Ground Cover area: 2,772 square feet Note: 1,512 square feet of ground cover deleted from this site on 7-00. A-35 The west side of Hermosa from Lemon to 125 feet north of Highland, the parkway on the south side of Lemon from 621 feet west of Hermosa to Hermosa. Ground Cover area: 10,494 square feet A-36 The south side of Lemon from 385 feet west of Mayberry to Cartilla. Ground Cover area:4,850 square feet A-37 The south side of Hillside north and south of the equestrian trail from Beryl to 203 feet east of Eastwood. Ground Cover area:4,900 square feet A-38 The median in the 9200 block of Monte Vista Ground Cover area: 500 square feet A-39 The south side of Almond from Henry to Sapphire; the west side of Sapphire from Almond to 255 feet south of Bella Vista. Ground Cover area: 6,926 square feet 5 P206 A-40 The parkway on the east side of Jasper from Hunter to Highland; the parkway on the south side of Highland from Jasper to Carnelian; the west side of Carnelian from Highland to 210 feet south of Highland. Ground Cover area: 14,858 square feet A-41 The west side of Sapphire from 236 feet north of Thoroughbred to Banyan. Ground Cover area: 2,656 square feet A-42 The parkway on the west side of Beryl from 132 feet north of Sunflower to 23 feet north of Sunflower; and from Sunflower to Banyan. Ground Cover area:4,735 square feet A-43 The north side of Base Line from Topaz to the Cucamonga Creek Channel. Ground Cover area: 4,563 square feet A-44 The cutouts on the west side of Sapphire from Banyan to Marble. Ground Cover area: 7,300 square feet A-45 The mainline for this site was connected to A-46 9-8-99. A-46 The south side of Banyan from North star to Zircon. Ground Cover area: 7,448 square feet A-47 The cutouts and vines on the north side of Banyan from 180 feet east of Zircon to 186 feet west of Vineyard. Ground Cover area: 1,300 square feet A-48 The parkway on the west side of Beryl from 452 feet north of Cielito; 158 feet south of Cielito and the easement between 9063 and 9073 Cielito from Cielito to 170 feet south of Cielito. Ground Cover area: 6,916 square feet A-49 The east side of Carnelian from 662 feet south of Banyan to Banyan; the south side of Banyan from Carnelian to Northstar. Ground Cover area: 5,906 square feet A-50 The north side of Almond from Sapphire to Crest View; the east and west side of Skyline from Almond to 595 feet north of Almond. Ground Cover area: 17,600 square feet A-51 The planter adjacent to the equestrian trail; from Haven to Riverwood, north of County flood retention basin, west of Chaffey College. The west side of Haven from 400 feet north of Amber To 270 feet south of Amber. Ground Cover area: 37,977 square feet 6 P207 A-52 The east side of Riverwood, from 188 feet south of Charwood to 193 feet north of Charwood. Ground Cover area: 2,750 square feet A-53 The west side of Jasper from Hunter to Highland. The south side of Highland from Jasper to 308 feet west of Sard. The east and westside of Sard from Highland to Hunter. Ground Cover area: 7,445 square feet A-54 The west side of Beryl from 233 feet north of Mignonette to Mignonette. Ground Cover area: 2,637 square feetMay 28, 2009 A-55 The north side of 19th from Cartilla to Mayberry. The east side of Mayberry from 19th to Heather. Ground Cover area: 8,410 square feet A-56 The east side of Beryl from 410 feet north of Wilson to Wilson The north side of Wilson from Beryl to 731 feet west of Buckthorn. The south side of Wilson from Buckthorn to Beryl. Ground Coverarea:19.708 square feet A-57 The east side of Hermosa From 115 north of Coca To 451 feet north of Coca. The trail north of water retention basin from Hermosa to 619 feet east of Hermosa. Ground Cover area: 9,406 square feet A-58 The west side of Haven from 510 feet south of Victoria to 1005 feet south of Victoria. Ground Cover area: 7,301 square feet A-59 The east side of Archibald from 820 feet south of Lemon to 448 feet south of Lemon and continues from 275 feet south of Lemon to 185 feet south of Lemon. Ground Coverarea:4,777 square feet A-60 The south side of Lemon from 290 feet east of Archibald to London. The West side of London from Lemon to Orange. Ground Cover area: 2,569 square feet A-61 The north side of Carrari from Archibald to London. Ground Cover area: 25,152 square feet A-62 The east side of Archibald from Carrari to 505 feet north of Meadowood. Ground Cover area: 8,626 square feet. 7 P208 A-63 The south side of Almond street from Carriage to Almond Ground Cover area: 3,342 square feet. A-64 The east side of Beryl from Cottonwood to Wilson. The south side of Wilson from Beryl to 437 feet east of Beryl. The north side of Wilson from Cousins to 474 feet east of Cousins. Ground Cover area: 11,973 square feet. A-65 The east side of Archibald from LaGloria to 328 feet north of LaGloria. Ground Cover area: 2,279 Square feet. A-66 The east side of Hermosa from Waterford to 500 feet north of Waterford. Ground Cover area:4,695 Square feet. A-67 The south side of 19`h from 220 feet east of Sapphire to Via Serena. Ground Cover area: 3,208 Square feet. A-69 The north side of Hillside from 27 feet west of Mayberry to 191 feet west of Mayberry. Ground Cover area: 1,002 square feet A-70 The south side of 19`h from 365 feet west of Amethyst to Amethyst. The west side of Amethyst from 19th to Hedges. Ground Cover area: 6,435 square feet A-73 The west side of Beryl from 300 feet north of San Simeon Drive to 130 feet north of San Simeon Drive. Ground Cover area:1,200 square feet B-1 The median on Blue Gum from Etiwanda to Blue Gum Court. Ground Cover area: 5,100 square feet B-2 The north side of 19th from Highland to Palm; the west and east side of Alameda from 19th to Ring; the east side of Palm from 19th to Ring. Ground Cover area: 22,550 square feet B-3 The paseo from Sutter Ct. to Deer Creek Channel. Ground Cover area: 294 square feet B-4 The north side of Banyan from Deer Creek Channel to 355 feet west of Fredericksburg. Ground Cover area: 9,200 square feet B-5 The north side of Lemon from Semillion to 188 feet west of Terracing. Ground Cover area:14,472 square feet 8 P209 B-6 The north side of Lemon from Barsac to Semillion. Ground Cover area: 15,784 square feet B-7 The south side of Banyan from Cabernet to 414 feet east of Cabernet. Ground Cover area: 18,814 square feet B-8 The south side of Banyan from Callaway to Muscat. Ground Cover area: 10,505 square feet B-9 The east side of Haven from Banyan to 240 feet north of Banyan; the north side of Banyan from Haven to Merlot. Ground Cover area: 24,975 square feet B-10 The east side of Haven from 400 feet south of Banyan to Banyan; the south side of Banyan from Haven to Callaway. Ground Coverarea:14,548 square feet B-11 The south side of Banyan from Muscat to Cabernet. Ground Cover area: 33,282 square feet B-12 The north side of Lemon from Barsac to 135 feet east of Valinda. Ground Cover area: 13,464 square feet B-13 The south side of 19th from Inyo to 585 feet east of San Benito; the parkways on the east and west side of San Benito from 19th to San Mateo; the east side of Inyo from 19th to paseo south of 19th and the paseo running east from Inyo to Sonora. Ground Cover area: 17,563 square feet Turf area: 3,387 square feet B-14 The paseo from San Benito and Sonora to the Deer Creek Channel. Ground Cover area: 2,000 square feet B-15 The paseo from Stanislaus and Lavine to the Deer Creek Channel. Ground Cover area: 1,040 square feet B-16 The paseo from Inyo to Mendocino. Ground Cover area: 225 square feet B-17 The paseo from Yuba Ct. to Deer Creek Channel. Ground Cover area: 918 square feet B-18 The south side of Wilson from 377 feet west of Canistel to 1032 feet east of Canistel. Ground Cover area: 6,762 square feet 9 P210 B-19 The east side of Haven from the Southern Pacific Railroad to 341 feet south of Victoria. Ground Cover area: 6,415 square feet B-20 The east side of Haven from 341 feet south of Victoria to Victoria; the south side of Victoria from Haven to 237 feet east of Mango. Ground Cover area: 16 900 square feet B-21 The south side of 19th from Valinda to Inyo. Ground Cover area: 3,900 square feet B-22 The south side of Lemon south of the sidewalk from 188 feet west of Terracina to 284 feet north of Marbella. The parkway on the south side of Lemon from 188 feet west of Terracina to 517 feet north of Marbella. The turf in the parkway at the end of the cul-de-sac on Sonterra Court. The parkway on the north side Lemon from 188 feet west of Terracina to 526 feet south of Terracina. The northside of Lemon north of the sidewalk from 188 feet west of Terracina to 562 feet south of Terracina. The turf in the parkway at the end of the cul-de-sac at Serena Street. Ground Cover area: 17,688 square feet. Turf Area: 6,390 square feet. B-23 The parkway on the east side of Lemon from 129 feet south of Marbella to 526 feet south of Terracina. The slope On the east side of Lemon east of the sidewalk from 129 feet south of Marbella to 562 feet south of Terracina. The west side of Lemon west of the sidewalk from 284 feet north of Marbella to 129 feet south of Marbella. The parkway on the west side of Lemon from 517 feet north of Marbella to 129 feet south of Marbella. Ground Cover area: 22,531 square feet. Note: There was 11,844 square feet of ground cover deleted from this site 7- 1-00. B-24 The south side of Highland from 327 feet west Deer Creek Channel to Deer Creek Channel. The paseo from Los Osos to Deer Creek Channel. Ground Cover area: 4,946 square feet. B-25 The south side of Banyan from 152 feet west of Cantabria to 930 feet east of Cantabria. Ground Cover area: 16,693 square feet. B-26 The north side of Wilson from 590 feet west of High Meadow Place to 187 feet east of High Meadow Place. Ground Cover area: 4,628 Square feet 10 P211 C-1 The north side of 26th from Andover to Hermosa; the east side of Hermosa from 26th to 331 feet north of Concord. Ground Cover area: 12,804 square feet Turf area: 9,423 square feet C-2 The entry monument on the north east and northwest corners of 4th and Archibald. Ground Cover area: 5,860 square feet Turf area: 5.546 square feet C-3 The south side of Base Line from Ramona to 128 feet east of Cambridge. Ground Cover area:17,262 square feet C-4 The south side of Base Line from 440 feet west of Ramona to Ramona. Ground Cover area: 6,198 square feet C-5 The south side of Base Line from 340 feet west of Center to 103 feet east of Center. Ground Cover area: 8,850 square feet C-6 The south side of Base Line from Ivy to 105 feet west of Marine. Ground Cover area: 8,080 square feet C-7 The parkway on the north side of Church from 142 feet east of Teak to 230 feet west of Teak. Ground Cover area: 1,813 square feet C-8 The west side of Hermosa from 524 feet north of Palo Alto to 142 feet south of Palo Alto. Ground Cover area: 2.650 square feet C-9 The parkway on the west side of Hermosa from 163 feet north of Ironwood to 145 feet south of Ironwood. Ground Cover area: 1,500 square feet C-10 The entry monument parkway on the south side of Base Line from the western city limit to Alta Cuesta. Ground Cover area: 9,756 square feet C-11 The parkway on the east side of Beryl from Alder to 135 feet north of Culpepper. Ground Cover area: 3,400 square feet C-12 The parkway on the east side of Hellman from Tryon to 665 feet north of Tryon. Ground Cover area: 8,280 square feet P212 C-13 The parkway on the west side of Hellman from 500 feet north of Church to Church. Ground Cover area: 2,416 square feet C-14 The east side of Archibald from 196 feet north of Palo Alto to 530 feet north of Palo Alto. Ground Cover area:4,262 square feet C-15 The north side of San Bernardino from Summerlin to 225' west of Summerin. Ground Cover area: 1,660 square feet C-16 The south side of Base Line from 286 feet west of Hermosa to Hermosa. The raised planter on the southwest corner of Base Line and Hermosa. Ground Cover area:4,190 square feet D-1 The east side of Rochester from Church to Base Line. Ground Cover area: 11,126 square feet Turf area: 16,794 square feet D-2 The east side of Rochester from 146 feet south of Chervil to Church St. Ground Cover area: 11,908 square feet Turf area: 9.950 square feet Ground cover, shrubs and turf areas that make up parkways, median islands and paseos are maintained under contract by a private landscape maintenance company. Parks are maintained by the City's Park Maintenance Crews. 12 P213 Section 2 -Estimate of Costs and Expenses: The budgeted costs for LMD #1 are for the direct maintenance of turf, ground cover, shrubs, community trails and parks. These functions, along with tree maintenance and certain irrigation system repair and testing, are performed through a Contract Services Agreement the City has with a private landscape maintenance company. The projected costs to operate and maintain LMD #1 are as follows: FISCAL YEAR 2009110 ESTIMATED BUDGET $1,108,550.00 Personnel Regular Payroll $76,910.00 Part-time Salaries $22,400.00 Fringe Benefits $38,610.00 Subtotal Personnel $137,920.00 Operations 8~ Maintenance Operations & Maintenance $52,850.00 O & M/Fadlities $16,000.00 Vehide Operations & Maintenance $2,000.00 Equipment Maintenance $3,800.00 Depredation-Computer Equipment $440.00 Utilfties Water Utilities $301,950.00 Telephone Utilities $4,190.00 Electric Utilities $60,610.00 Contract Services $551,090.00 Contract Services- Facilities $36,500.00 Tree Main~nance $63,260.00 Assessment Administration $64,820.00 Admin/General Overhead $81,160.00 Sulotal Operations $1238,670.00 Capital Expenditures Outlay/Equipment $0.00 Capita Project $0.00 Subtotal Capital Expenditures $0.00 Total LMD #1 Expendture Budget $1,376,590.00 Expenditure of Reserves -$268,040.00 Estimate of Costs & Expenses: $1,108,550.00 Total EDU 12,022.00 Assessement Rate per EDU $92.21 13 P214 Section 3 -Method of Assessment Apportionment: A. General The 1972 Act permits the establishment of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include construction, maintenance and servicing of public lights, landscaping and appurtenant facilities. The 1972 Act further requires that the cost of these improvements be levied according to special benefit to the assessed properties, rather than the assessed value of said properties: " The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements. " The formula used for calculating assessments in the District therefore reflects the composition of the parcels, and the improvements and services provided, to fairly apportion the costs based on the special benefit received by each assessed parcel. B. Assessment Methodology Equivalent Dwelling Units: To assess benefits equitably, it is necessary to relate the different types of parcel improvements to each other. The Equivalent Dwelling Unit method of apportionment uses the single-family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single family home equals one Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU). Every other land-use is converted to EDU's based on an assessment formula that equates the property's specific development status, type of development (land-use), and size of the property, as compared to asingle-family home (SFR). The EDU method of apportioning benefit is typically seen as the most appropriate and equitable assessment methodology for calculating benefit in districts formed under the 1972 Act, as the benefit to each parcel from improvements are apportioned as a function of land-use type, size and development. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land-use types to determine each parcel's EDU. LAND-USE/EQUIVALENT DWELLING UNITS Non-Residential Improved Multi-Family Residential Single Family Residential Vacant Value Multi 2.00 0.50 1.00 0.25 14 Unit Unit Acres P215 The following table summarizes the assessment rate for the district: Land Use Tvpe Single Family Multi-Family Assessment Rate $92.21/SFD $46.11 /DU The assessment rate is derived by dividing the total number of EDU within the District by the Total Estimate of Costs ($1,108,550.00/12,022 = $92.21). C. Assessment All assessed lots or parcels within the District are listed on the assessment role, which is on file in the office of the City Clerk and the City Engineer, and are hereby made a part of this Engineer's Report, by reference. The assessment roll states the net amount to be assessed upon all assessable lands within the District for Fiscal Year 2009/10, and describes each assessable lot or parcel of land within the District. These lots and parcels are more particularly described on the County assessment Roll, which is on file in the office of the San Bernardino County Assessor and by reference is made a part of this Engineer's Report. 15 P216 Section 4 -Annexations: Calendar Year 2008 Annexations Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 PROJECT UNITS ANNEX DATE DRC2005-01060 40 MULTI 5/7/2008 DRC2007-00491 1 SFR 5/7/2008 PM17808 (Tentative) 2 SFR 6!18/2008 8770 VINMAR 1 SFR 11/5/2008 DRC2006-00633 166 MULTI 11/19/2008 16 P21 ~ ~~ ' i ~/] ~~ ^` _ J ~ ~ ~ .--~ ~ ~ Q U . in o ~ ~ ~ ~..~ ~ ~ J ~~~ ~ o .. l _.._.._.._ ~ ~n N ~ ~ ~ ~ O r ~ _ J m ~ ~ ~ ~ m ~ 3 s m ° ° o I ~ Q //~~~ /~, ! n V 1Sp~ ~ ~ _ ~ V ~ ny epUeMl~~ ~ ny epU2Ml~3 l8 ~ e aa~~ J i Q .._.. _ .. i ~ ny ~a}sayoo~{ ny ~a;sayoo~ r"- ny ua~llllw ~ .._.._.._.._. i ny ua~i!II!W ny uaneH ny uaneH ny esouaaaH ny esou~~aH nH Pleq!yo~b' nd Plea!yo~`J ~ ny ueuallaH ny ueuallaH ~ L S ~ n y pa~r(au ln 3S uellauae~ =do~s~gPq~- ~ E g 9 d-_ g_ s- 3L ~ ~ ~ ~ - m £ c o a~ a~ _=~~ C~ c CO ~ VJ ~ _d .-Aa €~;~s s~,F~ggufr8 ~ ~ O `O OO aES o g_€8 ~ ¢ V q m 9 ~ ~ ~y ~ 07 LL °s~ a:sag;=a ~ ~A E~A~z q,4&~ %~ y 2 ~ v Vl = f0 m a,Em~ .y~s`s-y8 Su _~~-F"c. q F=E `~ ~~ AF 4O~ C = - T~ .'.~ c e `a ~8 or'~on Ja$ aa~-era9~oy ~iJ ctu-xr.~, c .__ (~ £.~q aA~~a~.~ P218 Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2009/2010 City of Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 (Victoria Planned Community) P219 ENGINEER'S REPORT AFFIDAVIT Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 (Victoria Planned Community) City of Rancho Cucamonga San Bernardino County, State of California This Report describes the District and all relevant zones therein including the improvements, budgets, parcels and assessments to be levied for Fiscal Year 2009/10, as they existed at the time of the passage of the Resolution of Intention. Reference is hereby made to the San Bernardino County assessor's maps for a detailed description of the lines and dimensions of parcels within the District. The undersigned respectively submits the enclosed Report as directed by the City Council. Dated this 3~d day of June, 2009 Approved by: Mark Steu~Direct~ngineering Services/City Engineer No. C053672 ' Exp. 6-30.1 1 CR~tI /.~ P220 TABLE OF CONTENTS OVERVIEW ..............................................................................................1 SECTION 1 -DESCRIPTION OF IMPROVEMENTS :.............................2 SECTION 2 -ESTIMATE OF COSTS AND EXPENSES :......................14 SECTION 3 -METHOD OF ASSESSMENT APPORTIONMENT:.........14 SECTION 3 -METHOD OF ASSESSMENT APPORTIONMENT:.........15 A. GENERAL ........................................................................................ 15 B. ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY ........................................................... 1 S C. ASSESSMENT .................................................................................. 16 SECTION 4 -ANNEXATIONS :..............................................................17 SECTION 5 -BOUNDARY MAP ...........................................................18 P221 Overview The Fiscal Year 2009/10 Annual Report for Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 (Victoria Planned Community) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 1, Chapter 1, Part 2, Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscape and Light Act of 1972 "the 1972 Act"). Section 1 Description of Improvements The plans and specifications for improvements maintained by the Landscape Maintenance District ("LMD #2" or the "District") consist of a general description of the nature, location, and the extent of the improvements proposed to be maintained, and are attached hereto. Section 2 Estimates of Cost and Expenses An estimate of the maintenance cost of the improvements, including incidental costs and expenses in connection therewith for FY 2009/10, is set forth on the lists thereof, attached hereto. Section 3 Method of Assessment Apportionment Discusses the methodology used for calculating assessments in the District. The method reflects the composition of the parcels, and the improvements and services provided, to fairly apportion the costs based on benefit to each parcel. The assessment roll states the net amount to be assessed upon all assessable lands within the District for Fiscal Year 2009/10, and describes each assessable lot or parcel of land within the District. These lots and parcels are more particularly described on the County assessment Roll, which is on file in the office of the San Bernardino County Assessor and by reference is made a part of this Engineer's Report Section 4 Annexations List the developments, which have annexed to the District during Calendar year 2008. P222 Section 1 -Description of Improvements: Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 ("LMD #2" or the "District") represents landscape sites throughout the Victoria Planned Community. These sites are associated with areas within the Victoria Planned Community and as such are of direct and special benefit to the parcels within that community. Because of this, assessmen ts required for this District are a ssessed only to parcels within that planned community. The sites maintained by the district consist of parkways, median islands, street trees, paseos, community trails and parks. Parks within LMD No. 2 include: Kenyon Park, Windrows Park, Ellena Park, Vintage Park, Victoria Groves Park and Victoria Arbors Park The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows: SCHEDULE V-A LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 SITE LOCATIONS June 3, 2009 Site # Descriptive Locations 2-1 Arbor Lane from Church to Cul-de-sac at the traffic circle excluding the frontage for Arbor Lane Park. The paseo from the west side of Arbor Lane to Day Creek. The paseo from the west side of Arbor Lane to Saintsbury. The north side of Winery Drive from Arbor Lane to 214 feet west of Arbor Lane. Ground Cover area: 87,985 square feet 2-2 The northwest corner of Day Creek and Church. The north side of Church from Day Creek to 1,152 feet west of Hess. The paseo from the north side of Church to Dry Creek Drive. The paseo from the north side of Church to Pine Ridge Place. The west side of Hess Place from the north side of Church to Dry Creek Drive. The south side of Church from 145 feet east of Hyssop to 896 feet east of Hyssop. Ground Cover area: 24,018 square feet 2-3 The west side of Day Creek from Church to 250 feet north of Appellation. The east side of Day Creek from Church to Madrigal. The Day Creek median from Church to Base Line. Ground Cover area: 31,455 square feet 2-4 Victoria Park Lane from Base Line to the east entrance of Arbor Park. The southwest corner of Victoria Park Lane and Base Line. Ground Cover area: 33,589 square feet 2 P223 Turf area: 3,874 square feet 2-5 Victoria Park Lane from the east entrance of Arbor Park to Church. Ground Cover area: 48,743 square feet 2-6 The north side of Church from Arbor Lane to Day Creek. The northwest corner of Church and Arbor Lane. The paseo from the north side of Church to Wilson Creek Drive. Ground Cover area: 18,469 square feet 2-7 The north side of Church from Victoria Park Lane to Arbor Lane. Ground Cover area: 16,609 square feet 2-8 The paseo from the west side of Etiwanda to Silver Rose Court. The north side of Church from Etiwanda to Victoria Park Lane. The east side of Iron Horse Place from Church to Wild Horse Way. The paseo from the north side of Church to Cloudy Bay Court. Ground Cover area: 35,122 square feet VW-1 Base Line median from Victoria Park Lane to 830 feet west of Victoria Park Lane. Ground Cover area: 44~ square feet VW-2 The north side of Base Line, 300 feet east and west of Swanson; the east and west sides of Swanson from Base Line to Province; the paseo from the intersection of Swanson and Province to Atwood with outlet to Dunmore; the paseo from Atwood to the Southern Pacific Railroad; the north side of Saratoga from Powell to Dunmore; the paseo from Saratoga to Etiwanda; the south side of Atwood from Victoria Park Lane to Travis; the north side of Atwood from Walcott to Victoria Park Lane. Ground Cover area: 18,753 square feet Turf area: 73,931 square feet VW-3 The Victoria Park Lane median and the west and east side parkways from Base Line to the entrance to Victoria Village. Ground Cover area: 24,453 square feet Turf area: 2 637 square feet VW-4 The Victoria Park Lane median and the west and east side parkways from Victoria Village entrance to Atwood. Ground Cover area: 30,695 square feet Turf area: 10,242 square feet VW-5 The Victoria Park Lane median and the west side and east side parkways from Atwood to the Southern Pacific Railroad. Ground Cover area: 49.513 square feet VW-6 The paseo running north from 12732 Farrington to the Southern Pacific Railroad. Ground Cover area: 285 square feet VW-7 The paseo running north from 12840 Farrington to the Southern Pacific Railroad. 3 P224 Ground Cover area: 266 square feet VW-8 The Victoria Park Lane median and the west side parkway from the Southern Pacific Railroad to South Victoria Windrows Loop. The Victoria Park Lane east side parkway from the Southern Pacific Railroad to Zinnia Ct. Ground Cover area: 40.548 square feet VW-9 The Victoria Park Lane east side parkway from Barberry to North Victoria Windrows Loop at Windrows Park. Ground Cover area: 9 188 square feet Turf area: 3j851 square feet VW-10 The west side of Victoria Park Lane from South Victoria Windrows Loop to Dahlia Ct.; the Victoria Park Lane median from Zinnia Ct., to Dahlia Ct.; and the east side of Victoria Park Lane from North Victoria Windrows Loop at Windrows Park to Dahlia Ct. Ground Cover area: 27,398 square feet Turf area: 37,350 square feet VW-11 The east side parkway on South Victoria Windrows Loop from Silktassel to Victoria Park Lane; the parkway on the south side of Victoria Park Lane from the intersection of South Victoria Windrows Loop and North Victoria Windrows Loop to Dahlia Ct.; the Victoria Park Lane median from the intersection of North and South Victoria Windrows Loop to Dahlia Ct.; and the parkway on the north side of Victoria Windrows Loop from the intersection of North and South Victoria Windrows Loop to Dahlia Ct. Ground Cover area: 23,082 square feet Turf area: 24,187 square feet VW-12 The Victoria Park Lane median from the intersection of North and South Victoria Windrows Loop west to the tract wall; the parkway on the north side of Victoria Park Lane from the intersection of North and South Victoria Windrows Loop, west to the tract wall; the parkway on the west side of north Victoria Windrows Loop from Silverberry to Victoria Park Lane and; the parkway on the south side of Silverberry from the wall to North Victoria Windrows Loop. Ground Cover area: 149.010 square feet Turf area: 38,842 square feet VW-13 The parkway on the south side of Victoria Park Lane from the west tract wall to South Victoria Windrows Loop; and the west side of South Victoria Windrows Loop from Victoria Park Lane to Snapdragon. Ground Cover area: 20,068 square feet Turf area: 16.476 square feet VW-14 The parkway on the west side of South Victoria Windrows Loop from Snapdragon to Victoria Park Lane; the parkway on the north and south side of Sugargum from South Victoria Windrows Loop to the wall; the parkways on the east and west sides of Basswood from Sugargum to Blazing Star; and the parkway on the north side of South Victoria Windrows Loop from Victoria Park Lane to Silktassel. Ground Cover area: 21,466 square feet P225 Turf area: 10,335 square feet VW-15 The parkway on the north side of Bougainvillea Way from Peach to North Victoria Windrows Loop; the parkway on the east side of North Victoria Windrows Loop from Bougainvillea Way and following that curb line to Citrus. The parkway on the north side of North Victoria Windrows Loop from Locust and following that curb line to Silverberry; the parkway on the north side of Silverberry from North Victoria Windrows Loop to the tract wall; the paseo from North Victoria Windrows Loop at Silverberry to Nasturtium; and the paseo from North Victoria Windrows Loop at Locust to Pistachio and continuing to Bougainvillea. Ground Cover area: 45.929 square feet Turf area: 12,207 square feet VW-16 The south side of Highland from 455 feet east Day Creek to 534 feet west of Locust. The east and west side of Locust from Highland to North Victoria Windrows Loop. The parkway on the south side of North Victoria Windrows Loop from Citrus east to Bougainvillea Ct.; the parkway on the north side of North Victoria Windrows Loop from Twinspur to Locust. Ground Cover area: 26,577 square feet Turf area: 23.922 square feet VW-17 This site was modified and added to VW-16, 1-5-99. VW-18 The south side of Highland from 12583 Highland, the Polka Palace to Rockrose. Ground Cover area: 2 800 square feet Turf area: 8,515 square feet VW-19 The north side of North Victoria Windrows Loop from Rosemary to Rockrose; the east side of Rockrose from North Victoria Windrows Loop to Highland; the south side of Highland from Rockrose to Etiwanda; and the horse trail from Highland and Etiwanda to the Fire Station. Ground Cover area: 21.027 square feet Turf area: 32.266 square feet VW-20 The parkway on the south side of North Victoria Windrows Loop from Victoria Park Lane to Plum; the paseo from Tipu east to the open field; and the parkway on the west side of North Victoria Windrows Loop from Plum Way to Rosemary Ct. Note: The area in front of Windrows Park is watered by VW-20 water meter, but is maintained by City crews. Ground Cover area: 2~ square feet VW-21 The east side of North Victoria Windrows Loop from Rosemary Ct., to the trail south of Kalmia St.; the trail and paseo from North Victoria Windrows Loop south of Kalmia St., to Etiwanda Ave., and north to the Fire Station; and the south side of Basil St., from North Victoria Windrows Loop to Santolina PI. Ground Cover area: 49.187 square feet Turf area: 57,532 square feet VW-22 The paseo from North Victoria Windrows Loop at Rockrose to the north east corner of Windrows Park and from that corner to Plum. P226 Ground Cover area: 13,689 square feet Turf area: 19,953 square feet VW-23 The west side of Rockrose from Highland to North Victoria Windrows Loop; the parkway on the north side of North Victoria Windrows Loop from Rockrose to Twinspur; and the parkway on the south side of North Victoria Windrows Loop from Bougainvillea Ct., to Rosemary. Ground Cover area: 18,299 square feet Turf area: 3~ square feet VW-24 The M.W.D. easement from Jasmine and Ironbark to Sweet Gum Dr. Ground Cover area: 475 square feet Turf area: 4 730 square feet VW-25 The north side of Baseline from 384 feet west of Wanona to Etiwanda. The west side of Etiwanda from Baseline to Craig. Ground Cover area: 20,934 square feet Turf area: 3~ square feet VW-26 The Paseo from Grape to 630 feet west of Grape. Ground Cover area 7 021 square feet VW-27 The south side of Baseline from 251 feet west of Swanson to Etiwanda. Baseline median from Victoria Park Lane to Swanson Place. Ground Cover area 18.816 square feet This site had 2667 feet of ground cover added from median 6-8-2005. VG-1 The turf and ground cover on the south side of Highland from the Deer Creek Channel to Fairmont; the turf and ground cover from Highland on the west side of Fairmont to Victoria Park Lane; the ground cover on the north side of Victoria Park Lane south of the horse trail; from 475 feet east of Milliken to Fairmont; the turf on the north side of Victoria Park Lane from 275 feet east of Milliken to Fairmont; the turf in the parkway on the east side of Fairmont from Victoria Park Lane to Highland. Ground Cover area: 21,573 square feet Turf area: 47.604 square feet VG-2 The turf on the east side of York from Delaware to Fairmont; the ground cover on the south side of Fairmont from York Place and continuing on that curb line to Victoria Park Lane; the turf and ground cover on the south side of Victoria Park Lane, west of Milliken, from Fairmont to Milliken; the parkway on the west side of Milliken from Victoria Park Lane to Fairmont; the Milliken median from Fairmont to Victoria Park Lane; the turf on the north side of Victoria Park Lane from 273 feet west of Milliken to Milliken; the ground cover on the north side of Victoria Park Lane, south of the horse trail, from 468 feet west of Milliken to Milliken. Ground Cover area: 29.395 square feet Turf area: 73.608 square feet VG-3 The turf and ground cover, north of the sidewalk, on the north side of Fairmont from Nova Ct., and continuing on that curb line to York PI.; and the turf south of the 6 P227 sidewalk on the north side of Fairmont from Armstrong PI., and continuing on that curb line to York PI.; the ground cover on the west side of York PI., from Fairmont to Delaware and the ground cover on the east side of York PI.; the turf and ground cover on the west side of Fairmont from Emerson continuing along that curb line to Armstrong PI.; the turf and ground cover on the east and west sides of Biola PI. Ground Cover area: 57.189 square feet Turf area: 38,343 square feet VG-4 The turf and ground cover on the south side of Fairmont from Armstrong to Milliken; the turf and ground cover on the west side of Milliken from Fairmont to the Southern Pacific Railroad; the Milliken median from Fairmont to the Southern Pacific Railroad; the ground cover on the north side of the Southern Pacific Railroad from Deer Creek Channel to Rochester, including the paseo to Baylor; the ground cover on the north side of Fairmont from Milliken to Nova Ct.; the turf on the north side of Fairmont from Milliken to Armstrong. Ground Cover area: 197,763 square feet Turf area: 24,151 square feet VG-5 The paseo from Biola at Amarillo to Delaware at York. Ground Cover area: 12,448 square feet Turf area: 44,896 square feet VG-6 The paseo beginning at the northeast corner of Victoria Groves park and Fairmont and extending to the Deer Creek Channel. Ground Cover area: 73,442 square feet Turf area: 74,778 square feet VG-7 The paseo that begins on the south side of Donnelly at Fairmont and continues to the Deer Creek Channel including the southward extension on the west side of Albright from Donnelly to Pacific and the paseo from Pacific to Charleston. Ground Cover area: 43,427 square feet Turf area: 51.765 square feet VG-8 The ground cover on the west side of Milliken from 566 feet north of Victoria Park Lane to Victoria Park Lane; the ground cover and turf north of the horse trail on Victoria Park Lane from Milliken to Fairmont; the ground cover on the east side of Fairmont from Victoria Park Lane to 156 feet north of Victoria Park Lane. Ground Cover area: 21.614 square feet Turf area: 8~ square feet VG-9 The ground cover on the east side of Fairmont from 156 feet north of Victoria Park Lane to Kenyon Way; the ground cover on the south side of Kenyon from Fairmont to 197 feet east of Fairmont; the turf on the south side of Kenyon from Fairmont to 316 feet east of Fairmont; the turf and ground cover on the south side of Baltimore Drive from Fairmont to Baltimore Court; the turf and ground cover on the north side of Baltimore Drive from Fairmont to Vanderbilt; the turf and ground cover on the east side of Vanderbilt from Baltimore to Brown; the paseo from Vanderbilt and Brown to Kenyon. Ground Cover area: 48,481 square feet Turf area: 11.357 square feet P228 VG-10 The ground cover on the south side of Kenyon from 197 feet east of Fairmont to Milliken; the turf on the south side of Kenyon from 316 feet east of Fairmont to Milliken; the ground cover on the west side of Milliken from Kenyon to 566 feet north of Victoria Park Lane; the turf and ground cover on the west side of Capitol from Brown to Bethany; the paseo from Capitol and Brown to Kenyon. Ground Cover area: 34,241 square feet Turf area: 11,031 square feet VG-11 Milliken from Baseline to the abandoned railroad. The north side of Baseline from 542 feet east of Milliken to Milliken. Ground Cover area: 31,367 square feet Turf area: 17.264 square feet This site was reduced on 4-1-2002 by 25,718 sq. ft. of turf and 3,037 sq. ft. of ground cover This site was added to on 10-2-2003. VG-12 The turf and ground cover on the south side of Fairmont from the southeast corner of Milliken and Fairmont along that curb line to Victoria Park Lane; the turf and ground cover on the west side of Fairmont from the southwest corner of Victoria Park Lane and Fairmont (located east of Milliken) and continuing along that curb line to Milliken; the turf on the east side of Milliken from the Southern Pacific Railroad to 730 feet south of Victoria Park Lane; the ground cover on the east side of Milliken from the Southern Pacific Railroad to 766 feet south of Victoria Park Lane. Ground Cover area: 53.068 square feet Turf area: 36,431 square feet VG-13 The paseo from Victoria Park Lane to Verona; from Verona to Napoli and Genova and to Tivoli. Ground Cover area: 17,993 square feet Turf area: 16.344 square feet VG-14 Base Line median from Milliken to Ellena East; the turf and ground cover on the north side of Base Line from Ellena East to Ellena West; the turf and ground cover on the east side of Ellena West from Base Line and following that curb line to Kenyon; the north side of Ellena West from Kenyon to Casoli; the turf and ground cover on both sides of Casoli from Ellena West to Candela; the turf and ground cover on both sides of Crema Place from Ellena west to Candela. Ground Cover area: 89,456 square feet Turf area: 62,999 square feet VG-15 The turf and ground cover on the west side of Rochester from the Railroad tracks to Base Line; the turf and ground cover on the north side of Base Line from Rochester to Ellena East; the Base Line Median from Rochester to Ellena East; the turf and ground cover on the east side of Ellena east from Base Line and continuing along that curb line to 275 feet north of Berra Road; the turf and ground cover on both sides of Berra from Ellena East to Comiso. Ground Cover area: 58,588 square feet P229 Turf area: 57,306 square feet VG-16 The paseo from Base Line to Ellena West with entrances to Amelia and Pavola Ground Cover area: 91661 square feet Turf area: 11,529 square feet VG-17 The paseo from Fairmont to the Southern Pacific Railroad; the paseo from Fabriano to Martano. Ground Cover area: 35.351 square feet Turf area: 40.291 square feet VG-18 The paseo from Rap allo to Gandino and south to the Southern Pacific Railroad. Ground Cover area: 4~ square feet VG-19 The paseo from Tole ntino to Pizolli and to Tolentino. Ground Cover area: 12,555 square feet Turf area: 17.856 square feet VG-20 The turf on the east side of Milliken from 730 feet south of Victoria Park Lane to Victoria Park Lane; the ground cover on the east side of Milliken from 766 feet south of Victoria Park Lane to Victoria Park Lane; the turf and ground cover on the south side of Victoria Park Lane from the southeast corner at Milliken heading east to Fairmont; the turf and ground cover on the north side of Victoria Park Lane from Parma to the northeast corner of Milliken and Victoria Park Lane; the ground cover on the west side of Parma from Victoria Park Lane median from Milliken to Pandio Ct.; the Milliken median from Victoria Park Lane to 440 feet south of Kenyon; the parkway on the west side of Milliken from 420 feet south of Kenyon to Victoria Park Lane. Ground Cover area: 76.232 square feet Turf area: 97.979 square feet VG-21 The ground cover on the east side of Parma; the ground cover on the north side of Victoria Park Ln., from Parma to 653 feet east of Kenyon; the turf on the north side of Victoria Park Lane from Parma to 653 feet east of Kenyon; the turf on the north side of Victoria Park Lane from Parma to 547 feet east of Kenyon; the turf and ground cover on the south side of Victoria Park Lane from Fairmont to 422 feet east of Kenyon; the turf and ground cover on the east and west sides of Kenyon from Victoria Park Lane to the Southern Pacific Railroad; the paseo from Kenyon to Rapallo; the paseo from Kenyon to Bari; the Victoria Park Lane median from Pandino Ct. to Portofino Ct. Ground Cover area: 69,167 square feet Turf area: 58,692 square feet VG-22 The ground cover on the north side of Victoria Park Lane from 653 feet east of Kenyon to Rochester; the turf on the north side of Victoria Park Lane from 547 feet east of Kenyon to Rochester; the Victoria Park Lane median from Portofino Ct., to Rochester Ave.; the turf and ground cover on the south side of Victoria Park Lane (north of sidewalk) from Kenyon to the east side of Vintage Park; the turf and ground cover on the south side of Victoria Park Lane from the east side of Vintage 9 P230 Park to Rochester; the turf and ground cover on the west side of Rochester from Victoria Park Lane to the Southern Pacific Railroad. Ground Cover area: 83.397 square feet Turf area: 89.674 square feet VG-23 The turf and ground cover on the east side of Kenyon from Victoria Park Lane to 409 feet west of Grimaldi; the ground cover on the south side of Portofino from Kenyon to Bergano; the turf and ground cover on the north and south side of Lark from Kenyon to the west side of Rancho Cucamonga High School; the ground cover on the east and west side of Matera from Lark to Pescara; the ground cover on the north and south side of Grimaldi, from Kenyon to Brindisi; the turf and ground cover on the west side of Kenyon from Lark to Victoria Park Lane; the ground cover on the north and south side of Marcello from Kenyon to Landriano. The paseo from southwest corner of Kenyon Park to Kenyon. The paseo from south west corner of Kenyon Park to Kenyon. Ground Cover area: 63.733 square feet Turf area: 82,565 square feet VG-24 The north side of Kenyon from Autumn Glen court to Woodruff. The east side of Woodruff from Kenyon to 403 feet north of Kenyon. Ground Cover area: 8~ square feet Turf area: 55~ square feet VG-25 The paseo west of Torino from Kenyon to Highland; the turf and ground cover on the south side of Highland from the northwest corner of Tract 13440 to the east end of Tract 13440. Ground Cover area: 40.800 square feet Turf area: 24.134 square feet VG-26 The paseo from Brindisi Ct., to Messina; the turf and ground cover on the north side of Brindisi Ct., to the end of the cul-de-sac; the turf and ground cover on the west side of Messina from the paseo to Treviso Way. Ground Cover area: 18.905 square feet Turf area: 1~ square feet VG-27 The Milliken median from 440 feet south of Kenyon to Highland; the parkway on the west side of Milliken from 420 feet south of Kenyon to Kenyon. Ground Cover area: 4~ square feet Turf area: 3 006 square feet Reduced 1,670 square feet of G.C. on 7-1-00 VG-28 The east side of Rochester from Victoria Park Lane to Highland. Ground Cover area: 60,902 square feet VG-29 The west side of Milliken from Highland Kenyon. The north side of Kenyon from Milliken to Fairmont. The groundcover on the eastside of Fairmont, east of sidewalk, from Kenyon to Highland. The south side of 210 freeway from Kenyon to Milliken from the asphalt to the wall. Ground Cover area: 69.788 square feet 10 P231 Turf area: 16.877 square feet Reduced 18,940 of turf on 7-1-00 VG-30 The south side of Tresenda from Santo to Sapada. The paseo from Sapada to Carano. The south side of Montella from Carano to Trivento. Ground Cover area: 6 797 square feet Turf area: 2 462 square feet VG-31 The east side of Brienza from Larino to Letini.The west side of Tindari from Letini to Larino. The Greenbelt on the south side of Marconi from Trivento to Comisco. The east side of Comisco from Scalea to Santo. Ground Cover area: 23,419 square feet Turf area: 18,351 square feet VG-32 The north side of Candela from Terini to Bettoloa. Ground Cover area: 20,172 square feet Turf area: 8J190 square feet VG-33 The paseo from the Sapri to Railroad. Ground Cover area: 894 square feet VG-34 The paseo from Bronte to Railroad. Ground Cover area: 894 square feet VG-35 The east side of Rochester from 555 feet south of Palmi to Victoria Park Lane. The south side of Victoria Park Lane and median from Rochester to east side of Deer Creek Channel. Ground Cover area: 53,646 square feet Turf area: 11,150 square feet VG-36 VG-37 The north side of Victoria Park Lane from the east side of Deer Creek Channel to Rochester. Ground Cover area: Turf area 55,780 square feet 10,500 square feet The paseo at the end of Armadore. Ground Cover area: 1~ square feet VG-38 The east side of Milliken from 106' feet north of Victoria Park Lane to Kenyon. The north & south of Spring Mist Drive From Milliken to Summerstone. The south side of Kenyon from Milliken to Kenyon Park. Ground Cover area: 28,051 square feet Turf area: 4,533 square feet VG-39 The north side of Victoria Park Lane from Kenyon paseo to 132' east of Milliken. The Kenyon Paseo outlet from Victoria Park Lane to Fairwinds Court. The Paseo from Victoria Park Lane to southwest corner of Kenyon Park. Ground Cover area: 55,089 square feet Turf area: 13,120 square feet I1 P232 VG-40 The south side of Highland from 413 feet west of Highland paseo to Highland paseo. The east side of Highland paseo from Highland to Kenyon. The north side of Kenyon from Highland paseo to Autumn Glen Court. Ground Cover area: 56,553 square feet VG-41 The Westside of Rochester from 294 feet south of Highland to Lark. The north side of Lark From Rochester to 1230 feet west of Rochester. Ground Cover area: 31.413 square feet VG-42 The south side of Highland from 1314 feet west of Rochester to Rochester. The west side of Rochester from Highland to 294 feet south of Highland. Ground Cover area: 18,464 square feet VG-43 The north side of Victoria Park Lane and the median from Day Creek Blvd. to Day Creek Channel. The east and west sides of Kensington Place from Victoria Park Lane to Stratford Drive. Ground Cover area: 70.669 square feet Turf area: 7 888 square feet VG-44 The west side of Day Creek Blvd. from 572 feet north of Silverberry to day Creek Blvd. The south side of Silverberry from Kensington to Day Creek Blvd. Ground Cover area: 36,835 square feet VG-45 The west side of Milliken and the Milliken median from the 210 freeway to Kenyan. Ground Cover area: 10,658 square feet Turf area: 610 square feet VG-46 The Baseline Median from 657 feet east of Virginia Drive to Rochester. The north side of Baseline from 278 feet east of Virginia to Rochester. The outlet at Huntley. The east side of Rochester from Baseline to 105 feet north of Shenandoah. Ground Cover area: 33,135 square feet VG-47 The north side of Baseline from 400 feet east of Day Creek Blvd. to Day Creek Blvd. Baseline median from Day Creek Blvd. to 595 feet east of Day Creek Blvd. Ground Cover area: 9,515 square feet. This site had an addition 6-8-2004 6, 272 square feet of ground cover for median. VG-48 The east side of Day Creek Blvd. and median from Baseline to Victoria Park Lane. The south side of Victoria Park Lane from Day Creek Blvd. to 390 feet east of Day Creek Blvd. Ground Cover area: 50,318 square feet Turf Area: 3,234 square feet VG-49 The north side of Victoria Park Lane and median from 390 feet east of Day Creek Blvd to Day Creek Blvd. The east side of Day Creek Blvd from Victoria Park Lane to Highland. The south side of Highland from Day Creek Blvd. to 440 feet east of Day Creek Blvd. Ground Cover area: 51,459 square feet 12 P233 Turf Area: 3,930 square feet VG-50 The west side of San Carmela from 389 feet north of of Baseline to Baseline. The north side of Baseline from Carmela to 264 feet west of Durness. Ground Cover area: 18,043 square feet VG-51 Paseo south of Saxon to Railroad right-of-way. Ground Cover area: 1,398 square feet VG-52 The north side of Sugar Gum from Milliken to Kensington. The south side of Sugar Gum from Milliken to 111 feet east of Suffolk. Ground Cover area: 4,362 square feet VG-53 The south side of Victoria Park Lane from 296 feet west of Kensington to Milliken. The west side of Day Creek Blvd. from Victoria Park Lane to 397 feet south of Sugar Gum. Ground Cover area: Turf Area: 28,532 square feet 11,070 square feet VG-54 The eastside of Rochester from Shenandoah to the railroad right-of-way. Ground Cover area: 6,684 square feet VG-55 Paseo north of Westhaven to the railroad. Ground Cover area: 1,775 square feet VG-56 The south side of Highland from 1317 feet West of Day Creek to 1085 feet west of Day Creek, including the un-irrigated slope on the south side of the sidewalk. Ground Cover area: 5,274 square feet Ground cover, shrubs and turf areas that make up parkways, median islands and paseos are maintained under contract by a private landscape maintenance company. Parks are maintained by the City's Park Maintenance Crews. 13 P234 Section 2 -Estimate of Costs and Expenses: The budgeted costs for LMD #2 are for direct maintenance of turf, ground cover, shrubs, community trails and parks. These functions, along with tree maintenance and certain irrigation system repair and testing, are performed through a Contract Services Agreement the City has with a private landscape maintenance company. The projected costs to operate and maintain LMD #2 are as follows: Persomel Regular Payroll $591,990.00 O~rtime Salaries $1,090.00 Part-time Salaries $80,320.00 Fringe Berefits $287,080.OD Subtotal Persomel $9,480.00 Operations Maintenance and Operations $45,250.00 Mainterenoe and Operations- Fadlities $17,300.00 Vehide Maintenance and Operations $5,000.OD Cmtract Services $840,500.00 Crntrad Services- Fadlities x,000.00 Tree Mantenance $37,350.OD Utilities Water Utilities $787,520.00 Telephone Utilities $1,180.00 Electric Utilities $90,860.00 Assessment Administration $34,900.00 General Overhead $184,380.00 Subtotal Operations $2,049,240.00 Capital Expenditures Outlay/Building Improvements $0.00 Outlay/Equipment $0.00 Sutkotal Capital Expenditures $0.00 Total IJVID #2 Expenditure Budget $3,009,720.00 Expend'Rureof Reserves X204,580.00 Estimate of Costs 8~ Expenses: $2,805,140.00 Total EDU: 6,647.25 Assessment Rate per EDU: $422.00 14 P235 Section 3 -Method of Assessment Apportionment: A. General The 1972 Act permits the establishment of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include construction, maintenance and servicing of public lights, landscaping and appurtenant facilities. The 1972 Act further requires that the cost of these improvements be levied according to special benefit to the assessed properties, rather than the assessed value of said properties: "The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each such !ot or parcel from the improvements. " The formula used for calculating assessments in the District therefore reflects the composition of the parcels, and the improvements and services provided, to fairly apportion the costs based on the special benefit received by each assessed parcel. B. Assessment Methodology Equivalent Dwelling Units: To assess benefits equitably, it is necessary to relate the different types of parcel improvements to each other. The Equivalent Dwelling Unit method of apportionment uses the single-family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single family home equals one Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU). Every other land-use is converted to EDU's based on an assessment formula that equates the property's specific development status, type of development (land-use), and size of the property, as compared to asingle-family home (SFR). The EDU method of apportioning benefit is typically seen as the most appropriate and equitable assessment methodology for calculating benefit in districts formed under the 1972 Act, as the benefit to each parcel from improvements are apportioned as a function of land-use type, size and development. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land-use types to determine each parcel's EDU. LAND-USE/EQUIVALENT DWELLING UNITS EDU Value Multiplier Non-Residential Improved 2.00 Vacant 0.25 Multi-Family 1.00 Single Family Residential 1.00 Acres Acres Unit Unit IS P236 The following table summarizes the assessment rate for the district: Land Use Tvpe Single Family Multi-Family Commercial/Industrial Vacant Assessment Rate $422.00/SFD $422.00/DU $844.00/Acre $105.50/Acre The assessment rate is derived by dividing the total number of EDU within the District by the Total Estimate of Costs ($2,805,140.00/6,647.25 = $422.00). C. Assessment All assessed lots or parcels within the District are listed on the assessment role, which is on file in the office of the City Clerk and the City Engineer, and are hereby made a part of this Engineer's Report, by reference. The assessment roll states the net amount to be assessed upon all assessable lands within the District for Fiscal Year 2009/10, and describes each assessable lot or parcel of land within the District. These lots and parcels are more particularly described on the County assessment Roll, which is on file in the office of the San Bernardino County Assessor and by reference is made a part of this Engineer's Report. 16 P237 Section 4 -Annexations: Calendar Year 2008 Annexations Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 PROJECT UNITS ANNEX DATE NO ANNEXATIONS 17 P23F N ~~ V .i " y . ' w ~ J 0 ~ .T. ~ ~ ~ Q~ ~ (J d ~ ~ v °' ~'x ~ _ ti .t °' ~ ~ J ~ 1 .._.._.._.._ ~ N ~ ~ c y .~ _ o r J 0] ~ ~ ~ Q1 ~ ~ LL Q ~ i _.._.._i nH ~se3 in ! ~ L ® v V ~ ny epuenn!;3 ny epuen~!;3 I ~ aa~ e ~e >I ~ ~ - .._.. _ .._ J ~ • ny ~a;sayooa ny ~a;sayoob r"- i ny ua~!II!W ~ .._.._.._..- i ny ua>I!II!W i i ny uaneH ; ny uaneH i i ~ ny esow~aH i ny esow~aH i ny Pleq!yay . nV Pleq!4o~V i ! n uew i a ~ ny uewllaH ~~• ..~ y ll H S~ •• L V i ny p~e~tau!n lS ue!lawe~! ~E.~s!G~sQ: : ~ t • -• 9'a ~ ¢:99 g ~.._.._ .._..~ _ _, nyana~ , age~f;,er ~..~ _ > aCE fl~ `n g ~F ` Il ~ f6 O Q 3Szey °': ': ~ K C m LL k~s g! g fl:~`s ~ ~ ;O C ~SF~ie':y,pg•d ~~p•'„~s E~i a€~b~~n N m Y3vSS~J 4°Pi ~c5. _ PPE ~eP iPg ~ ~~ is!!?eo;ay!a U ~Ei`: &:~sE;:i P239 Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2009/2010 City of Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 3A (Hyssop Maintenance District) P240 ENGINEER'S REPORT AFFIDAVIT Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 3A (Hyssop Maintenance District) City of Rancho Cucamonga San Bernardino County, State of California This Report describes the District and all relevant zones therein including the improvements, budgets, parcels and assessments to be levied for Fiscal Year 2009/10, as they existed at the time of the passage of the Resolution of Intention. Reference is hereby made to the San Bernardino County assessor's maps for a detailed description of the lines and dimensions of parcels within the District. The undersigned respectively submits the enclosed Report as directed by the City Council. Dated this 3`d day of June, Approved by: of Engineering Services/City Engineer Na.COS"ss72 Exp. s-3C-1 I P241 TABLE OF CONTENTS OVERVIEW .............................................................................................. 1 SECTION 1 -DESCRIPTION OF IMPROVEMENTS :............................. 2 SECTION 2 -ESTIMATE OF COSTS AND EXPENSES :........................ 3 SECTION 3 -METHOD OF ASSESSMENT APPORTIONMENT:........... 4 A. GENERAL .......................................................................................... 4 B. ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY ............................................................. 4 C. ASSESSMENT .................................................................................... 5 SECTION 4 -ANNEXATIONS :................................................................ 6 SECTION 5 -BOUNDARY MAP ............................................................. 7 P242 Overview The Fiscal Year 2009/10 Annual Report for Landscape Maintenance District No. 3A (Hyssop Maintenance District) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 1, Chapter 1, Part 2, Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscape and Light Act of 1972, "the 1972 Act"). Section 1 Description of Improvements The plans and specifications for improvements maintained by the Landscape Maintenance District ("LMD #3A" or the "District") consist of a general description of the nature, location, and the extent of the improvements proposed to be maintained, and are attached hereto. Section 2 Estimates of Cost and Expenses An estimate of the maintenance cost of the improvements, including incidental costs and expenses in connection therewith for Fiscal Year 2009/10, is set forth on the-lists thereof, attached hereto. Section 3 Method of Assessment Apportionment Discusses the methodology used for calculating assessments in the District. The method reflects the composition of the parcels, and the improvements and services provided, to fairly apportion the costs based on benefit to each parcel. The assessment roll states the net amount to be assessed upon all assessable lands within the District for Fiscal Year 2009/10, and describes each assessable lot or parcel of land within the District. These lots and parcels are more particularly described on the County assessment Roll, which is on file in the office of the San Bernardino County Assessor and by reference is made a part of this Engineer's Report Section - 4 Annexations List the developments, which have annexed to LMD #3A during Calendar year 2008. P243 Section 1 -Description of Improvements: Landscape Maintenance District No. 3A ("LMD #3A" or the "District") represents a landscape parkway on Hyssop Drive south of Sixth Street. The site is associated with the areas within the LMD #3A and as such is of direct and special benefit to the parcels within the District. Because of this, assessments required for this District are assessed only to parcels within this District. The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows: LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3A SITE LOCATIONS June 3, 2009 Site# Descriptive Location J-1 The west side of Hysop from 7~h street to the south end of the cul-de-sac. Ground Cover area: 6,050 square feet. P244 Section 2 -Estimate of Costs and Expenses: The budgeted costs for LMD #3A are for direct maintenance of turf, ground cover, shrubs and the neighborhood park. These functions, along with tree maintenance and certain irrigation system repair and testing, are performed through a Contract Services Agreement the City has with a private landscape maintenance company. The projected costs to operate and maintain LMD #3A are as follows: Maintenance and Operations $200.00 Contract Services $2,540.00 Water Utilities $440.00 Electric Utilities $540.00 Assessment Administration $50.00 General Overhead $190.00 Sulrtotal Operations $3,960.00 Total LMD #3a Expenditure Budget $3,960.00 Expenditure of Reserves -$270.00 Estimate of Costs 8 Expenses: $3,690.00 Total EDU 8.92 Assessment Rate per EDU $413.74 P245 Section 3 -Method of Assessment Apportionment: A. General The 1972 Act permits the establishment of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include construction, maintenance and servicing of public lights, landscaping and appurtenant facilities. The 1972 Act further requires that the cost of these improvements be levied according to special benefit to the assessed properties, rather than the assessed value of said properties: "The nef amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements. " The formula used for calculating assessments in the District therefore reflects the composition of the parcels, and the improvements and services provided, to fairly apportion the costs based on the special benefit received by each assessed parcel. B. Assessment Methodology Equivalent Dwelling Units: To assess benefits equitably, it is necessary to relate the different types of parcel improvements to each other. The Equivalent Dwelling Unit method of apportionment uses the single-family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single family home equals one Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU). Every other land-use is converted to EDU's based on an assessment formula that equates the property's specific development status, type of development (land-use), and size of the property, as compared to asingle-family home (SFR). The EDU method of apportioning benefit is typically seen as the most appropriate and equitable assessment methodology for calculating benefit in districts formed under the 1972 Act, as the benefit to each parcel from improvements are apportioned as a function of land-use type, size and development. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land-use types to determine each parcel's EDU. LAND-USE/EQUIVALENT DWELLING UNITS EDU Value Single Family Residential 1 Unit Multi-Family Residential 1 Unit Industrial 1.00 Unit Vacant 0.25 Acre 4 P246 The following table summarizes the assessment rate for the district: Land Use TyAe Assessment Rafe Commercial/Industrial $413.74/Acre The assessment rate is derived by dividing the total number of EDU within the District by the Total Estimate of Costs ($3,690.00/8.92 = $413.74). C. Assessment All assessed lots or parcels within the District are listed on the assessment role, which is on file in the office of the City Clerk and the City Engineer, and are hereby made a part of this Engineer's Report, by reference. The assessment roll states the net amount to be assessed upon all assessable lands within the District for Fiscal Year 2009/10, and describes each assessable lot or parcel of land within the District. These lots and parcels are more particularly described on the County assessment Roll, which is on file in the office of the San Bernardino County Assessor and by reference is made a part of this Engineer's Report. 5 P247 Section 4 -Annexations: Calendar Year 2008 Annexations Landscape Maintenance District No. 3A PROJECT UNITS ANNEX DATE NO ANNEXATIONS P24£ Q M ~ ~, v.. N •_ `Fi J Q Y ~ ~ Q O " ~ ,~ ~ o ~ ~..~ N •~ ~ J ~ ._.._.. 1 ~ ~ N ~ C ~/ .i J m O " ~ .~ i '~ m r a 3 o ~ ~~ i nH ase3 in ~ ! i Q ! v ~ i ny epuenn!;3 ® ny epue,wl;3 V i a ~ ~9 ~aaJ~ e0 .._.._ J ' ny Ja;sayoob ny Ja;sayooa i'- i .._..- ny ua~!II!W ~ .._.._ i ny ua>I!II!W i i ny uaneH ; i i ny uaneH ny esowJaH i ny esowJaH i nV Pleq!yoJ'd • nd PIe9!yoJH i ~ ny uewllaH i ~ ny uewllaH ..~~ .~ i ~ ~ L L V I ~ ny pJe~tau!n lS ue!lawe~~ ~€~4 ~4i$~`--g p F ~~' • yy ~ ~$ i .._.._w '~ y • t. i • _• e ~, ~€pa~ €§5 ogggg Ek Kn F &~ l 8 •, • (n ~ ._... _ nf/anOJ~ A g Sa k-~ e 1..~ .i C [7] IY !n ,~~~as P c s ~f 49 ~9.C pB p Bi~ a e ~ ~ c ~ ~q~ a Q¢ s@ $p €E94~QCa E~" m y 6 p2 S ~£ ps sS ~PPafayl'~~F t~geE33a a g~ xg~~ g g ~33y U ~k~:85E a~LP P249 Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2009/2010 City of Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B (Commercial Industrial Maintenance District) P250 ENGINEER'S REPORT AFFIDAVIT Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 36 (Commercial Industrial Maintenance District) City of Rancho Cucamonga San Bernardino County, State of California This Report describes the District and all relevant zones therein including the improvements, budgets, parcels and assessments to be levied for Fiscal Year 2009/10, as they existed at the time of the passage of the Resolution of Intention. Reference is hereby made to the San Bernardino County assessor's maps for a detailed description of the lines and dimensions of parcels within the District. The undersigned respectively submits the enclosed Report as directed by the City Council. Dated this 3rd day of Ju Approved by: ~'"l/l/ `-~_ Mar ctor of Engineering Services/City Engineer No. C053672 ' Exp. 6.36.1 ] P251 TABLE OF CONTENT OVERVIEW ..............................................................................................1 SECTION 1 -DESCRIPTION OF IMPROVEMENTS :.............................2 SECTION 2 -ESTIMATE OF COSTS AND EXPENSES :........................4 SECTION 3 -METHOD OF ASSESSMENT APPORTIONMENT:...........5 A. GENERAL ..........................................................................................5 B. ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY .............................................................5 C. ASSESSMENT ....................................................................................6 SECTION 4 -ANNEXATIONS :................................................................7 SECTION 5 -BOUNDARY MAP .............................................................8 P252 Overview The Fiscal Year 2009/10 Annual Report for Landscape Maintenance District No. 36 (Commercial Maintenance District) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 1, Chapter 1, Part 2, Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscape and Light Act of 1972). The plans and specifications for improvements maintained by Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B ("LMD #3B" or the "District") consist of a general description of the nature, location, and the extent of the improvements proposed to be maintained, and are attached hereto. Section - 2 Estimates of Cost and Expenses An estimate of the maintenance cost of the improvements, including incidental costs and expenses in connection therewith for Fiscal Year 2009/10, is set forth on the lists thereof, attached hereto. Section - 3 Method of Assessment Apportionment Discusses the methodology used for calculating assessments in the District. The method reflects the composition of the parcels, and the improvements and services provided, to fairly apportion the costs based on benefit to each parcel. The assessment roll states the net amount to be assessed upon all assessable lands within the District for Fiscal Year 2009/10, and describes each assessable lot or parcel of land within the District. These lots and parcels are more particularly described on the County assessment Roll, which is on file in the office of the San Bernardino County Assessor and by reference is made a part of this Engineer's Report Section - 4 Annexations List the developments, which have annexed to LMD #3B during Calendar year 2008. P253 Section 1 -Description of Improvements: Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B (LMD #3B) represents landscape sites throughout the Commercial/Industrial Maintenance District. These sites are associated with areas within that District and as such any special benefit derived from the landscape installation can be directly attributed to the parcels within the District. The various landscape sites that are maintained by this district consist of median islands, parkways, street trees and entry monuments. The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows: SCHEDULE V-B LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B SITE LOCATIONS June 3, 2009 Site # Descriptive Locations J-2 The monument at the northeast corner of Haven and 4th Street. Ground Cover area: 5,715 square feet Turf area: 6,068 square feet J-3 The 6th street median from Milliken to Pittsburg. Ground Cover area: 3,300 square feet J-4 The entry monuments on the east and west side of 4th and Milliken. Ground Cover area: 19,771 square feet Turf area 9,060 square feet J-5 The Milliken median from Arrow to Jersey Ground Cover area: 10,220 square feet J-6 The Spruce median from Foothill to White Oak. Ground Cover area: 4,300 square feet J-7 The 6th Street median from Pittsburg to Richmond. Ground Cover area: 5.114 square feet J-8 The 6th Street median from Richmond to Buffalo. Ground Cover area: 2,476 square feet 2 P254 J-9 The Milliken railroad underpass. Ground Cover area: 165,633 square feet 12-12-01 added 5199 sq feet Turf area: 4,897 square feet J-10 The 6`h street median from Cleveland to 1,820 feet east of Cleveland. Ground Cover area: 13,310 square feet J-12 The Milliken median from Arrow to Century. Ground Cover area: 13,855 square feet J-13 The Milliken median from Century to Foothill Blvd. Ground Cover area: 3,330 square feet J-14 The 6~h Street median from Utica to Cleveland. J-15 The 6~h Street median form Haven to Utica. Ground Cover area: 7,680 square feet. 2-9-36 Day Creek median from Church to Foothill. Ground Cover area: 8,466 square feet 2-10-3B The Day Creek medians south of Foothill including the roundabout. Ground Cover area: 6,490 square feet 3 P255 Section 2 -Estimate of Costs and Expenses: The budgeted costs for LMD #3B are for direct maintenance of turf, ground cover, shrubs and entry monuments. These functions, along with tree maintenance and certain irrigation system repair and testing, are performed through a Contract Services Agreement the City has with a private landscape maintenance company. The projected costs to operate and maintain LMD #36 are as follows: - rr~ ~ ~ ~ .~r~ ~ ~ ~~ Personnel Regular Payroll $311,690.00 Overtime Salaries $2,630.00 Part-time Salaries $53,700.00 Fringe Beneffis $152,400.00 Subtotal Personnel $520,420.00 Operations Maintenance and Operations $58,900.00 Maintenarxeand Operations- Facilities $1,000.00 Vehicle Mairtenan~ and Operations $1,500.00 Emergency & Routine Vehicle Equipmert Rental $2,000.00 Equipment Mairtenance $12,000.00 Contrad Services $383,030.00 Contrad Services -Facilities $109,500.00 Tree Mainterenoe $21,850.00 Utilities Water Utilities $80,870.00 Telephone Utilities $1,240.00 Eledric Utilities $43,780.00 Assessment Administration $f 080.00 General Overhead $69,110.00 Subtotal Operations $790,860.00 Capital Expenditures Buildings & Improvements $Q00 OutlayEquipment $0.00 OrtalyVehicles $0.00 Subtotal Capital Expenditures $0.00 Total LMD#i36 Expenditure Budget $1,311,280.00 Expendture of f~serves -$382,210.00 Estimate of Costs & Expenses: $929,070.00 Total EDU 2,633.42 Assessment Rate per EDU $352.80 P256 Section 3 -Method of Assessment Apportionment: A. General The 1972 Act permits the establishment of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include construction, maintenance and servicing of public lights, landscaping and appurtenant facilities. The 1972 Act further requires that the cost of these improvements be levied according to special benefit to the assessed properties, rather than the assessed value of said properties: " The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements. " The formula used for calculating assessments in the District therefore reflects the composition of the parcels, and the improvements and services provided, to fairly apportion the costs based on the special benefit received by each assessed parcel. B. Assessment Methodology Equivalent Dwelling Units: To assess benefits equitably, it is necessary to relate the different types of parcel improvements to each other. The Equivalent Dwelling Unit method of apportionment uses the single-family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single family home equals one Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU). Every other land-use is converted to EDU's based on an assessment formula that equates the property's specific development status, type of development (land-use), and size of the property, as compared to asingle-family home (SFR). The EDU method of apportioning benefit is typically seen as the most appropriate and equitable assessment methodology for calculating benefit in districts formed under the 1972 Act, as the benefit to each parcel from improvements are apportioned as a function of land-use type, size and development. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land-use types to determine each parcel's EDU. LAND-USE/EQUIVALENT DWELLING UNITS Property Type EDU Value Multiplier Commercial /Industrial 1.00 Acre Vacant 0.25 Acre Single-Family Residential 1 Unit Multi-Family Residential 1 Unit 5 P257 The following table summarizes the assessment rate for the district: Land Use Tvpe Assessment Rate Commercial/Industrial $352.80/Acre The assessment rate is derived by dividing the total number of EDU within the District by the Total Estimate of Costs ($929,070.00/2,633.42 = $352.80). C. Assessment All assessed lots or parcels within the District are listed on the assessment role, which is on file in the office of the City Clerk and the City Engineer, and are hereby made a part of this Engineer's Report, by reference. The assessment roll states the net amount to be assessed upon all assessable lands within the District for Fiscal Year 2009/10, and describes each assessable lot or parcel of land within the District. These lots and parcels are more particularly described on the County assessment Roll, which is on file in the office of the San Bernardino County Assessor and by reference is made a part of this Engineer's Report. 6 P258 Section 4 -Annexations: Calendar Year 2008 Annexations Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B PROJECT UNITS ANNEX DATE DCR2005-00287 1.69 AC 1/16/2008 TR17818 6.97 AC 1/16/2008 DRC2006-00692 1.93 AC 6/18/2008 DCR2005-00831 1.09 AC 8/20/2008 DRC2008-00357 0.19 AC 10/15/2008 DCR2006-00866 30.41 AC 11/19/2008 TR18994 5.47 AC 12/3/2008 7 P259 m M ~~ V ~' .~ ~ ~ m . ° ~ Q 4 ~ C ~ _ ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ ° ~ r.x J ~ .~ V ~ ' o L' ~n ._.._......_.._ ` ~ { -a ~ N u4i ~ I ~ ~ r c J _ m o `1~1 ~ - ~ ~ ~ _ L • ~ ~ ~ p (~ i ~ O LL ~ Q ~ ' d ~Se~ n U; V ~ ~ ny epuennl~3 ny epuennl~~ ~ ~ ~ ~e ~aaa~ e4 J ~ ny ~a~sa yao~ ny aa~sayao~ r"- r.._.._.._.._. ny ua~{iiIIW i i ny ua~illl!W ny uaneH ny uaneH ny esoua~aH ny esow~aH ny Pleglya~y ny pleq!uo~`d ~ ny ueuallaH ny ue~ullaH ~ ~ L_ ~ ny p~elau l/~ lS UeIIaUJe~ =€F`~EOe~_~ ' E2e~~~_'z ~~ T g+ -= `4"E° ~ n anon - ~ L O ~ _zg~~g~~6~.`3 CD ~ ~ c IL _~c_- e ~S ~ c ~~a~~ss°tg~- < `~~~c y5c'°:~L° z~ 53 _ ~:? ay ay E9 _ L~es~c2 -- J -~-~;s':o~:= P260 Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2009/2010 City of Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 4 (Terra Vista Planned Community) P261 ENGINEER'S REPORT AFFIDAVIT Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 4 (Terra Vista Planned Community) City of Rancho Cucamonga San Bernardino County, State of California This Report describes the District and all relevant zones therein including the improvements, budgets, parcels and assessments to be levied for Fiscal Year 2009/10, as they existed at the time of the passage of the Resolution of Intention. Reference is hereby made to the San Bernardino County assessor's maps for a detailed description of the lines and dimensions of parcels within the District. The undersigned respectively submits the enclosed Report as directed by the City Council. Dated this 3rd day of Ju Approved by: of Engineering Services/City Engineer ~~Q~OFF,GFESS%~~e ~~:~:.,~ c. ~ bu- 1 1 1.-. CMl ~~Pt F~EOF CAUF~Q` P262 TABLE OF CONTENTS OVERVIEW ................................................................................1 SECTION 1 -DESCRIPTION OF IMPROVEMENTS ..........................2 SECTION 2 -ESTIMATE OF COSTS AND EXPENSES .....................8 SECTION 3 -METHOD OF ASSESSMENT APPORTIONMENT..........9 SECTION 3 -METHOD OF ASSESSMENT APPORTIONMENT..........9 A. GENERAL ........................................................................9 B. ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY .........................................9 C. ASSESSMENT ................................................................10 SECTION 4 -ANNEXATIONS ......................................................11 SECTION 5 -BOUNDARY MAP ...................................................12 P263 Overview The Fiscal Year 2009/10 Annual Report for Landscape Maintenance District No. 4 (Terra Vista Planned Community) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 1, Chapter 1, Part 2, Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscape and Light Act of 1972, "the 1972 Act"). Section 1 Description of Improvements The plans and specifications for improvements maintained by the Landscape Maintenance District ("LMD #4" or the "District") consist of a general description of the nature, location, and the extent of the improvements proposed to be maintained, and are attached hereto. Section - 2 Estimates of Cost and Expenses An estimate of the maintenance cost of the improvements, including incidental costs and expenses in connection therewith for Fiscal Year 2009/10, is set forth on the lists thereof, attached hereto. Section - 3 Method of Assessment Apportionment Discusses the methodology used for calculating assessments in the District. The method reflects the composition of the parcels, and the improvements and services provided, to fairly apportion the costs based on benefit to each parcel. The assessment roll states the net amount to be assessed upon all assessable lands within the District for Fiscal Year 2009/10, and describes each assessable lot or parcel of land within the District. These lots and parcels are more particularly described on the County assessment Roll, which is on file in the office of the San Bernardino County Assessor and by reference is made a part of this Engineer's Report Section - 4 Annexations List the developments, which have annexed to LMD #4 during Calendar year 2008. P264 Section 1 -Description of Improvements: Landscape Maintenance District No. 4 (LMD #4) represents landscape sites throughout the Terra Vista Planned Community. These sites are considered to be associated with areas within that District and as such any special benefit derived from the landscape installation can be directly attributed to those parcels within the District. Because of this, assessments required for this district are assessed to parcels within that District only. The following is a summary of area and acreage maintained by the LMD #4: Type Area Landscape 810,665 square feet Parks 38 acres The various landscape sites in Terra Vista that are maintained by the district consist of parkways, median islands, street trees, paseos and parks. The 38 acres of park consist of Spruce Park, Mountain View Park, Ralph M. Lewis Park, Coyote Canyon Park, Milliken Park, and West Greenway Park. The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows: SCHEDULE V-A LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 4 SITE LOCATIONS March 19, 2008 Site # Descriptive Location TV-1 The monument on the southwest corner of Haven and Base Line; the Base Line median from Haven to the Deer Creek Channel; and the south side of Base Line from Haven to Deer Creek Channel less the frontage of the condominium complex. Ground Cover area:18,091 square feet Turf area: 21,799 square feet P265 TV-2 Base Line median from Spruce to Deer Creek Channel; the south side of Base Line from Deer Creek Channel to Spruce; the west side of Spruce from Base Line to Terra Vista Parkway; the north side of Spyglass from Spruce to Roxbury. Ground Cover area:15.072 square feet Turf area: 18,858 square feet TV-3 TV-4 The Base Line median east of Spruce. Ground Cover area: 12,707 square feet Turf area: 18,820 square feet The south side of Base Line from 800 feet east of Spruce to Milliken. The cul-de-sac at the north end of Cascade, Ground Cover area: 9,278 square feet Turf area: 12,659 square feet TV-5 The north side of Terra Vista Parkway from Belpine to 112 feet west of Butterfield; Terra Vista Parkway median from Spruce to Milliken and the south side of Terra Vista Parkway from 164 feet west of Belpine to Belpine. Ground Cover area: 13,411 square feet Turf area: 6.555 square feet TV-6 The north side of Terra Vista Parkway from Spruce to 175 feet north of Countryside and Terra Vista Parkway median from Church to Spruce. Ground Cover area: 17,991 square feet Turf area: 11,413 square feet TV-7 The north side of Church from the Deer Creek Channel to Terra Vista Parkway; the west side of Terra Vista Parkway from Church to 175 feet north of Countryside. Ground Cover area:9,924 square feet Turf area: 5,378 square feet TV-8 The southeast corner of Church and Haven; the Church median from Haven to Terra Vista Parkway and the wash end on the Northwest corner of the Deer Creek Channel and Church. Ground Cover area:26,876 square feet Turf area: 2,306 square feet TV-9 The Church median from Terra Vista Parkway to Elm. Ground Cover area: 3,749 square feet TV-10 The east side of Valencia from Base Line to the pre-school; the south side of Augusta from Valencia to Meadow Lark and the west side of Summerfield from Valencia to Evergreen. Ground Cover area: 20.818 square feet Turf area: 18,634 square feet P266 TV-11 The paseo at Parkside and Clover from Parkside to the Deer Creek Channel. Ground Cover area:2,795 square feet TV-12 The east side of Haven from the pre-school to the Southern Pacific Railroad. Ground Cover area:6,170 square feet Turf area: 2,091 square feet TV-13 The east side of Spruce from Elm to Mountain View; the north and south sides of Norfolk from Spruce to Cardiff; the south side of Mountain View from Spruce to 290 feet east of Belvedere and the paseo from Spruce to Countryview. Ground Cover area: 8,459 square feet Turf area: 3,355 square feet TV-14 The south side of Mountain View from 290 feet east of Belevedere to 590 feet east of Fairhaven; the paseo south of Mountain View between Belevedere and Fairhaven to Country View and from Countryview to West Greenway Corridor. Ground Cover area:19,030 square feet Turf area: 8,430 square feet TV-15 The north side of Mountain View from 634 feet west of Biarritz to Milliken. Ground Cover area:4,571 square feet Turf area: 4,738 square feet TV-16 The west Greenway Corridor from the northeast corner of Elm and Spruce to West Greenway Park. Ground Cover area: 15,529 square feet Turf area: 20.884 square feet TV-17 The west side of Milliken from 585 feet north of Mountain View to Mountain View. Ground Cover area: 5,835 square feet Turf area: 3,564 square feet TV-18 The south side of Mountain View from approximately 250 feet west of Claridge to Terra Vista Parkway; the south side of Terra Vista Parkway from Mountain View to East Greenway Corridor; Terra Vista Parkway from Mountain View to East Greenway Corridor. Ground Cover area:18,316 square feet Turf area: 5,944 square feet TV-19 The Terra Vista Parkway median from Milliken to Mountain View; the north side of Terra Vista Parkway from 68 feet north of Addison to Mountain View; the west side of Mountain View from Grapevine to Terra Vista Parkway. Ground Cover area: 20,306 square feet Turf area: 3,886 square feet P267 TV-20 The Church median from Milliken to 675 feet east of Milliken. Ground Cover area: 2,860 square feet TV-21 The Church median from Milliken to Spruce. Ground Cover area: 16.811 square feet Turf area: 335 square feet TV-22 The Milliken median from Mountain View to Foothill. Ground Cover area: 16,436 square feet TV-23 The Milliken underpass from West Greenway Park to Milliken Park. Ground Cover area: 19,271 square feet Turf area: 22,139 square feet TV-24 The east side of Haven from 145 feet south of Creekbridge to 600 feet north of Creekbridge; the northside of Creekbridge from Brookside to Haven and the paseo from Creekbridge and Brookside to the Deer Creek Channel. Ground Cover area: 5.851 square feet Turf area: 9,965 square feet TV-25 The east side of Haven from 145 feet south of Creekbridge to 410 feet south of Creekbridge. Ground Cover area: 3,319 square feet Turf area: 1,677 square feet TV-26 The paseo at Plymouth south of Essex from Plymouth to the Deer Creek Channel. Ground Cover area: 1,956 square feet TV-27 The paseo from Terra Vista Parkway to Windsong and from Windsong to Plymouth. Ground Cover area: 2,270 square feet Turf area: 2,731 square feet TV-28 The paseo at 7552 Hardy. Ground Cover area: 630 square feet Turf area: 733 square feet TV-29 The East Greenway Corridor from Milliken Park to Terra Vista Parkway. Ground Cover area:17,780 square feet Turf area: 51,478 square feet TV-30 The Milliken Median from Mountain View to Base Line. Ground Cover area:11,890 square feet P268 TV-31 The paseo from Elm to West Greenway Park. Ground Cover area:4,770 square feet TV-32 The Greenwich paseo from Greenwich to Muirfield. Ground Cover area: 1,323 square feet TV-33 The south side of Mountain View from 430 feet west of Country View to Country View. Ground Cover area: 3,434 square feet Turf area: 1,853 square feet TV-34 The south side of Terra Vista Parkway from 390 feet west of Belpine to Belpine. Ground Cover area:1,342 square feet Turf area: 1,887 square feet TV-35 The Trail Northeast of Ruth Musser School from Terra Vista Parkway to Spruce. Ground Cover area: 9,285 TV-36 The north side Meyers from Emery Place to Elm. Ground Cover area: 9,141 square feet Turf area: 5,895 square feet TV-37 The north side of Meyers from Emery Place to Elm. Ground Cover area: 5.860 square feet Turf area: 5,300 square feet TV-38 The Church median from Rochester to Terra Vista Parkway median from Church to north of Church. Ground Cover area: 8,510 square feet TV-39 The north side of Mountain View from 250 feet east of Milliken to Milliken. The eastside of Milliken from Mountain View to Terra Vista Parkway. Ground Cover area:16,751 square feet TV-40 The southside of Terra Vista Parkway from Milliken to Mountain View. Ground Cover area:11,630 square feet. TV-41 The paseo from south of Terra Vista parkway to Mountain View which is east of Milliken. Ground Cover area:4,081 square feet TV-42 The north side of Mountain View from Terra Vista Parkway to 250 feat east of Milliken. Ground Cover area:10,994 square feet 6 P269 TV-43 Church median and parkway from Malaga to Terra Vista Parkway. Ground Cover area: 7,506 square feet TV-44 The south side of Church from Terra Vista Parkway to Rochester. Ground Cover area:10,400 square feet TV-45 The west side of Rochester from Church to Malaga. Ground Cover area:20,693 square feet TV-46 The north side of Malaga from Church to Rochester. Ground Cover area: 19,843 square feet TV-47 The eastside of Terra Vista Parkway from Church to Brandywine. The paseo from Brandwine to Bunker Hill Drive. The eastside of Radcliff from Bunker to Malada. Ground Cover area: 17,838 square feet P270 Section 2 -Estimate of Costs and Expenses: The budgeted costs for LMD #4 are for direct maintenance of turf, ground cover, shrubs and parks. These functions, along with tree maintenance and certain irrigation system repair and testing, are performed through a Contract Services Agreement the City has with a private landscape maintenance company. The projected costs to operate and maintain LMD #4 are as follows: Personnel Regular Payroll $759,880.00 Overtime Salaries $1,050.00 Part-time Salaries $32,280.00 Fringe Benefits $360,690.00 Subtotal Personnel $1,153,900.00 Operations Maintenance and Operations $51,150.00 Maintenance and Operations -Facilities $16,000.00 Vehicle Maintenance and Operations $6,000.00 Equipment Maintenance $3,750.00 Emergency & Routine Vehicle Equipment Rental $0.00 Contract Services $339,270.00 Contract Services -Facilities $16,000.00 Tree Maintenance $10,180.00 Depreciation -Computer Equipment $150.00 Utilities Water Utilities $373,490.00 Telephone Utilities $2,670.00 Electric Utilities $36,310.00 Assessment Administration $21,040.00 General Overhead $121,330.00 Subtotal Operations $997,340.00 Capital Expenditures Outlay/Building Improvements $0.00 Outlay/Equipment $0.00 Subtotal Capital Expenditures $0.00 Total LMD #4 Expenditure Budget $2,151,240.00 Expenditure of Reserves -$508 030.00 Estimate of Costs & Expenses: $1,643,210.00 Total EDU Assessment Rate per EDU 3,254.01 EDU Varies by parcel type 8 P271 Section 3 -Method of Assessment Apportionment: A. General The 1972 Act permits the establishment of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include construction, maintenance and servicing of public lights, landscaping and appurtenant facilities. The 1972 Act further requires that the cost of these improvements be levied according to special benefit to the assessed properties, rather than the assessed value of said properties: "The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements. " The formula used for calculating assessments in the District therefore reflects the composition of the parcels, and the improvements and services provided, to fairly apportion the costs based on the special benefit received by each assessed parcel. B. Assessment Methodology Equivalent Dwelling Units: To assess benefits equitably, it is necessary to relate the different types of parcel improvements to each other. The Equivalent Dwelling Unit method of apportionment uses the single-family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single family home equals one Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU). Every other land-use is converted to EDU's based on an assessment formula that equates the property's specific development status, type of development (land-use), and size of the property, as compared to asingle-family home (SFR). The EDU method of apportioning benefit is typically seen as the most appropriate and equitable assessment methodology for calculating benefit in districts formed under the 1972 Act, as the benefit to each parcel from improvements are apportioned as a function of land-use type, size and development. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land-use types to determine each parcel's EDU. LAND-USE/EQUIVALENT DWELLING UNITS EDU Value Multiplier Multi-family 1.00 Single Family 1.00 Commercial /Industrial 1.00 Senior Housing 1.00 Vacant 0.25 Unit Parcel Acre Unit Acre 9 P272 The following table summarizes the assessment rates for the district: Land Use Tvpe Single Family Multi-Family Senior Multi Commercial/Industrial Vacant Assessment Rate $252.50/SFD $222.00/DU $148.36/DU $382.99/Acre $37.12/Acre The assessment rate is derived by dividing the total number of EDU within the District by the Total Estimate of Costs. This District assesses a different rate to parcels of different types. C. Assessment All assessed lots or parcels within the District are listed on the assessment role, which is on file in the office of the City Clerk and the City Engineer, and are hereby made a part of this Engineer's Report, by reference. The assessment roll states the net amount to be assessed upon all assessable lands within the District for Fiscal Year 2009/10, and describes each assessable lot or parcel of land within the District. These lots and parcels are more particularly described on the County assessment Roll, which is on file in the office of the San Bernardino County Assessor and by reference is made a part of this Engineer's Report. 10 P273 Section 4 -Annexations: Calendar Year 2008 Annexations Landscape Maintenance District No. 4 PROJECT UNITS ANNEX DATE NO ANNEXATIONS 11 P274 N N ~ ~ ~ ~ II ,, v • i w w h E J Q .~.. ~ ~ ~ CJ ~ Q~ ~ • w y ~ •~ o L J ~ ~ o .._.._.._.._ ~ N 1 aj ~ c o r J 0] ~ ! ~ ~ 3 i m o 0 1 ti Q Q ~ _.._.._~nV;sea in i i L ~ i ~ V i ny epuenn!;3 ® ny epuenni;3 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ aaJ e ~a >I ° ~ _. ._.._.. _~ .._. J ny Ja;sayoob ny Ja;sayooy r"- i ny ua~!IIIW i .._.._.._.._ ny ua~!II!W i i i ny uaneH : ! i ny uaneH ny esowJaH i ny esowJaH i nH Pleq!yoJy : nH Pleq!yoJH ! ~ ny uewllaH ~• •.~ ny uewllaH i ~ ~ ~ i •~ L t v ~ ny pJebau ln ~ ;S Ue11aUJe~ ~ `ssE=aEa~ p-a -E e g s~ ~: g"-o~ /w .. ~ o'ygafra~~¢W_. „ ~ * ~ fi=g"€$85a°%& J _ a ... rn N •_.._..L _..~• ~ ~ ~ a ~.~a Sa a ^~ ~ _ ._.._ _ m ~ o y 4 m.g ~ d' C m LL cn: ~~>an ~:_p "5 € x ;i n V C 6FEFE xg.p!ef ' m pU~~E~ ~£ ~~a 6 pZ = UO E -g ~d Y~:`g5t ~' K ° 5 ° z~ p ¢ ~OEo& 5 a E~gpgn~ r.°; r U y ~8te °~g~CE$:E P275 Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2009/2010 City of Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 (Tot Lot) P276 ENGINEER'S REPORT AFFIDAVIT Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 (Tot Lot) City of Rancho Cucamonga San Bernardino County, State of California This Report describes the District and all relevant zones therein including the improvements, budgets, parcels and assessments to be levied for Fiscal Year 2009/10, as they existed at the time of the passage of the Resolution of Intention. Reference is hereby made to the San Bernardino County assessor's maps for a detailed description of the lines and dimensions of parcels within the District. The undersigned respectively submits the enclosed Report as directed by the City Council. Dated this 3`d day of J Approved by: r of Engineering Services/City Engineer ~: „e~F"tSSlpf/ .pAE;"STS Fyc ~ ;r ,u.;<. ~t!o.CG53;!; _~~~~;; ~' ¢ Ezp, 6-3G-1 I Xr d'J. CMl ytr i 9~OF ChU~/ P277 TABLE OF CONTENTS OVERVIEW .............................................................................................. 4 SECTION 1 -DESCRIPTION OF IMPROVEMENTS :............................. 5 SECTION 2 -ESTIMATE OF COSTS AND EXPENSES :........................ 6 SECTION 3 -METHOD OF ASSESSMENT APPORTIONMENT:........... 7 SECTION 3 -METHOD OF ASSESSMENT APPORTIONMENT:........... 7 A. GENERAL .......................................................................................... 7 B. ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY ............................................................. 7 C. ASSESSMENT .................................................................................... 8 SECTION 4 -ANNEXATIONS :................................................................ 9 SECTION 5 -BOUNDARY MAP ........................................................... 10 P278 Overview The Fiscal Year 2009!10 Annual Report for Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 (Tot Lot) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 1, Chapter 1, Part 2, Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscape and Light Act of 1972 "the 1972 Act"). Section - 1 Description of Improvements The plans and specifications for improvements maintained by Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 ("LMD #5" or the "District") consist of a general description of the nature, location, and the extent of the improvements proposed to be maintained, and are attached hereto. Section - 2 Estimates of Cost and Expenses An estimate of the maintenance cost of the improvements, including incidental costs and expenses in connection therewith for Fiscal Year 2009/10, is set forth on the lists thereof, attached hereto. Section - 3 Method of Assessment Apportionment Discusses the methodology used for calculating assessments in the District. The method reflects the composition of the parcels, and the improvements and services provided, to fairly apportion the costs based on benefit to each parcel. The assessment roll states the net amount to be assessed upon all assessable lands within the District for Fiscal Year 2009/10, and describes each assessable lot or parcel of land within the District. These lots and parcels are more particularly described on the County assessment Roll, which is on file in the office of the San Bernardino County Assessor and by reference is made a part of this Engineer's Report Section - 4 Annexations List the developments, which have annexed to LMD #5 during Calendar year 2008. 4 P279 Section 1 -Description of Improvements: Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 (LMD #5) represents a landscaped tot lot, located on the southwest corner of Andover Place and Bedford Drive. This site is associated with a group of 44 single family parcels which all have a common usage of the tot lot such that any special benefit derived from the landscaping can be directly attributed to those particular parcels. Because of this, assessments required for this District is charged to those parcels only. The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows: LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 5 SITE LOCATIONS June 3, 2009 Site # Descriptive Location I-1-5 The tot lot on the southwest corner of Andover and Bedford. Ground Cover area: 1,506 square feet Turf area: 1,070 square feet LMD-5 TOTAL GROUND COVER: 1,506 square feet LMD-5 TOTAL TURF: 1,070 square feet 5 P280 Section 2 -Estimate of Costs and Expenses: The budgeted costs for LMD #5 are for direct maintenance of ground cover and turf. These functions, along with tree maintenance and certain irrigation system repair and testing, are performed through a Contract Services Agreement the City has with a private landscape maintenance company. The projected costs to operate and maintain LMD #5 are as follows: ,• rr~ r ~ ~ : ~ ~r rr Operations Maintenance and Operations $300.00 Maintenance and Operations -Facilities $500.00 Vehicle Maintenance and Operations $70.00 Contract Services $2,100.00 Contract Services -Facilities $1,000.00 Water Utilities $720.00 Electric Utilities $250.00 Assessment Administration $240.00 General Overhead $360.00 Subtotal Operations $5,540.00 Total LMD #5 Expenditure Budget $5,540.00 Expenditure of Resen~es $0.00 Estimate of Costs & Expenses: $5,540.00 Total EDU 44 Assessment Rate per EDU $113.29 6 P281 Section 3 -Method of Assessment Apportionment: A. General The 1972 Act permits the establishment of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include construction, maintenance and servicing of public lights, landscaping and appurtenant facilities. The 1972 Act further requires that the cost of these improvements be levied according to special benefit to the assessed properties, rather than the assessed value of said properties: "The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements. " The formula used for calculating assessments in the District therefore reflects the composition of the parcels, and the improvements and services provided, to fairly apportion the costs based on the special benefit received by each assessed parcel. B. Assessment Methodology Equivalent Dwelling Units: To assess benefits equitably, it is necessary to relate the different types of parcel improvements to each other. The Equivalent Dwelling Unit method of apportionment uses the single-family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single family home equals one Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU). Every other land-use is converted to EDU's based on an assessment formula that equates the property's specific development status, type of development (land-use), and size of the property, as compared to asingle-family home (SFR). The EDU method of apportioning benefit is typically seen as the most appropriate and equitable assessment methodology for calculating benefit in districts formed under the 1972 Act, as the benefit to each parcel from improvements are apportioned as a function of land-use type, size and development. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land-use types to determine each parcel's EDU. LAND-USE/EQUIVALENT DWELLING UNITS EDU Value Multiplier Multi-Family 1.00 Single Family 1.00 Commercial/Industrial 2.00 Vacant 0.25 Parcel Parcel Acre Acre 7 P282 The following table summarizes the assessment rate for the district: Land Use TyPe Assessment Rate Single Family $113.29/SFD The assessment rate is derived by dividing the total number of EDU within the District by the Total Estimate of Costs ($4,980/44 = $113.29). C. Assessment All assessed lots or parcels within the District are listed on the assessment role, which is on file in the office of the City Clerk and the City Engineer, and are hereby made a part of this Engineer's Report, by reference. The assessment roll states the net amount to be assessed upon all assessable lands within the District for Fiscal Year 2009/10, and describes each assessable lot or parcel of land within the District. These lots and parcels are more particularly described on the County assessment Roll, which is on file in the office of the San Bernardino County Assessor and by reference is made a part of this Engineer's Report. 8 P283 Section 4 -Annexations: Calendar Year 2008 Annexations Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 NO ANNEXATIONS P284 ~ _~ V ~~ .i "'~ N ~ J Q ~ Q~ ~ ~ = U ~ o V o N y ~ ~~x d ti .~ J ~ ~ o _ C 1 .._ .._.._.._ ~ ~ N ~ I c y „1 o i J 0] ~ ! ~ r 3 m ° C 1 ii Q G1 i _.._.._inV lse~ in f Q I i t j ~ V i ny epuenn113 ® ny epuenn113 a c ~9 >I e4 aaJ~ .._.. _ .. J ' ny Jalsayooa ny Jalsayooy r"' ny ua~illiW ~ .._ i i .._.._..- ny ua>I!II!W i i ny uaneH ° ny uaneH i i ny esowJaH i i ny esowJaH nH PleglyoJy: nV Pleq!yoJ'd t ' n uew a ny uewllaH i is ~ '• y ll H I ~ L L ~ I e ( ny pJ aw^ ~ 1 se•`s •°P ~. . t € 1.._.._ tr .._..~._. nyanoJ~ Fgee€€o _~9 _ n ~`-t bs' 1 i'~• L • m J - r 3 ~_„ ?ape 1PF Fy3fiA ' ._.._..1 ~ .._.._ ~..~...• ~ N O o ro ~;° = as ` EeB: a.H ~~ ' x x se N i~~s0i" a € ' m - I € 3 8 e sf~41B2 0~ _ m _ ~yl g -Pfef'ea?sag $€ s a a!alap~s; U ftf:flgf?s3:e P285 Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2009/2010 City of Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 6 (Caryn Planned Community) P286 ENGINEER'S REPORT AFFIDAVIT Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 6 (Caryn Planned Community) City of Rancho Cucamonga San Bernardino County, State of California This Report describes the District and all relevant zones therein including the improvements, budgets, parcels and assessments to be levied for Fiscal Year 2009/10, as they existed at the time of the passage of the Resolution of Intention. Reference is hereby made to the San Bernardino County assessor's maps for a detailed description of the lines and dimensions of parcels within the District. The undersigned respectively submits the enclosed Report as directed by the City Council. Dated this 3'd day of June, 2009 Approved by: Mark St r Direc of Engineering Services/City Engineer No, C0596T2 ~• 6'x'1 P287 TABLE OF CONTENTS OVERVIEW ..............................................................................................1 SECTION 1 -DESCRIPTION OF IMPROVEMENTS :.............................2 SECTION 2 -ESTIMATE OF COSTS AND EXPENSES :........................7 SECTION 3 -METHOD OF ASSESSMENT APPORTIONMENT:...........? SECTION 3 -METHOD OF ASSESSMENT APPORTIONMENT:...........8 A. GENERAL ..........................................................................................8 B. ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY .............................................................8 C. ASSESSMENT ....................................................................................9 SECTION 4 -ANNEXATIONS :..............................................................10 SECTION 5 -BOUNDARY MAP ...........................................................11 P288 Overview The Fiscal Year 2009/10 Annual Report for Landscape Maintenance District No. 6 (Caryn Planned Community) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 1, Chapter 1, Part 2, Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscape and Light Act of 1972, "the 1972 Act"). Section - 1 Description of Improvements The plans and specifications for improvements maintained by Landscape Maintenance District No. 6 ("LMD #6" or the "District") consist of a general description of the nature, location, and the extent of the improvements proposed to be maintained, and are attached hereto. Section - 2 Estimates of Cost and Expenses An estimate of the maintenance cost of the improvements, including incidental costs and expenses in connection therewith for Fiscal Year 2009/10, is set forth on the lists thereof, attached hereto. Section - 3 Method of Assessment Apportionment Discusses the methodology used for calculating assessments in the District. The method reflects the composition of the parcels, and the improvements and services provided, to fairly apportion the costs based on benefit to each parcel. The assessment roll states the net amount to be assessed upon all assessable lands within the District for Fiscal Year 2009/10, and describes each assessable lot or parcel of land within the District. These lots and parcels are more particularly described on the County assessment Roll, which is on file in the office of the San Bernardino County Assessor and by reference is made a part of this Engineer's Report Section - 4 Annexations List the developments, which have annexed to LMD #6 during Calendar year 2008. P289 Section 1 -Description of Improvements: Landscape Maintenance District No. 6 ("LMD #6" or the "District") represents landscape sites throughout the Caryn Planned Community. These sites are associated with areas within that District and as such any special benefit derived from the landscape installation and maintenance can be directly attributed to the parcels within that District. Because of this, assessments required for this District are assessed to parcels within that District only. The following is a summary of area and acreage maintained by the District: Type Area Landscape 1,103,626 square feet Trails 1.94 acres The various sites maintained by the district consist of parkways, median islands, paseos, street trees, and community trails. The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows: SCHEDULE III-A LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 6 SITE LOCATIONS June 3, 2009 Site # Descriptive Locations CC-1 The Southside of Banyan from 1290 feet west of Milliken to Milliken. The Westside of Milliken & Median from Banyan to 292 south of Vintage. Ground Cover area: 96,892 square feet Turf area: 17,945 square feet This site was reduced March 13, 2003 because of freeway right-a-way 15,176 Ground Cover and 4,077 square feet Turf. CC-2 This site was deleted 7-1-00 and was combined with CC-1. Both sites had 7784 square feet of ground cover deleted and 4077 of turf deleted. P290 CC-3 The paseo on the west side of Morning from Morning Place to Deer Creek Channel. Ground Cover area: 2,801 square feet Turf area: 124 square feet CC-4 The west side of Morning PI., from Banyan to Starview PI.; the north side of Star View PI., from Morning PI., to Star View CT. Ground Coverarea:14,273 square feet Turf area: 5,513 square feet CC-5 Silver Sun paseo from the end of Silver Sun cul-de-sac to Deer Creek Channel. Ground Cover area: 25,890 square feet Turf area: 12,084 square feet CC-6 The east and west side of Netherlands View Loop from Vintage to Vintage. The Netherlands View Loop paseo from Netherlands View Loop to Mt Sterling CT. Ground Cover area: 88,902 square feet Turf area: 676 square feet CC-7 The east and west side of Hillview Loop from Mt. Rainer CT. to Kettle Peak. Ground Cover area: 14,930 square feet Turf area: 6,318 square feet CC-8 The paseo from Hiliview Loop to Vintage Drive. Ground Coverarea:42,107 square feet Turf area: 22,752 square feet CC-9 The south side of Vintage from 250 feet west of Hillview Loop to Hillview Loop. The west side of Hillview Loop from Vintage to Kettle Peak. The west side of Kettle Peak from Hillview Loop to Donner Pass CT. The east side of Hillview Loop from Kettle Peak to Tioga Peak. Ground Cover area:47,334 square feet Turf area: 4,954 square feet CC-10 The east side of Terrace View Loop from Vintage to Butler Peak. The west side of Terrace View Loop from Rainbow Falls CT. to Vintage. Ground Cover area: 24,603 square feet P291 CC-11 The paseo from Caryn School to Banyan. The south side of Banyan from the paseo to Rochester. The east and west side of Mt. Baldy CT. from Banyan to Sierra Crest View Loop. The north side of Sierra Crest View Loop from Hilltop CT. to Woodland CT. Ground Cover area:47,507 square feet Turf area: 7,810 square feet CC-12 The separation paseo from Vintage to Pinnacle Peak. Ground Cover area: 50,325 square feet Turt area: 15,021 square feet CC-13 The east side of Hillview Loop from Tioga Peak CT. to Vintage. The south side of Vintage From Hillview Loop to Terrace View Loop. The north side of Vintage from Hillview Loop to Caryn School. The east side of Terrace View Loop from Vintage to Mt. San Antonio CT. Ground Cover area: 26,162 square feet Turf area: 4,508 square feet CC-14 The east side of Sierra Crest View Loop from Mt. Waverly to Vintage. The north side of Vintage from Sierra Crest View Loop to Sierra Crest View Loop. The east and west side of Sierra Crest View Loop from Vintage to Mt. Wilson CT. The south side of vintage from Netherlands View Loop to 330 feet west of Netherlands View Loop. Ground Cover area: 73,250 square feet Turf area: 16,525 square feet CC-15 The south side of Sierra Crest View Loop From Mt. Waverly CT. to Mt. Cambridge CT. The north side of Sierra Crest View Loop from Mt. Cambridge CT. to Woodland CT. The north side of Sierra Crest View Loop from Hilltop CT. to Caryn School. The Sierra Crest View Loop paseo from Sierra Crest View Loop to Mt. Sherman CT. Ground Cover area: 70,990 square feet Turf area: 7,699 square feet CC-16 The south side of Vintage from Netherlands View Loop to Rochester. The north side of Vintage from Rochester to Sierra Crest View Loop. The east and west side of Sierra Crest View Loop from Mt. Wilson CT. to Mt. Cambridge CT. The Netherlands View Loop paseo from Vintage to Mt. Sterling CT. Ground Cover area: 77,202 square feet Turf area: 3,954 square feet CC-17 The east side of Milliken from Vintage to Banyan Ground Cover area: 13,740 square feet Turf area: 9,088 square feet 4 P292 CC-18 The north side of Vintage from Milliken to Hillview Loop. The south side of Vintage from 104 feet west of Hillview to Milliken. Ground Cover area: 32,287 square feet Turf area: 3,889 square feet July 1, 2002 a reduction of 622 sq. feet of G.C. and 4710 sq. feet of turf because a new street was installed south o Vintage. CC-19 The Terrace View Loop paseo from Vintage to Terrace View Loop. Ground Cover area:17,496 square feet Turf area: 15,617 square feet CC-20 The east side of Terrace View Loop from Mt. San Antonio CT. to EI Capitan CT. The west side of Terrace View Loop from Butler Peak PI. to Mt San Antonio CT. Ground Cover area: 20,627 square feet Turf area: 20,017 square feet CC-21 The west side of Rochester from Banyan to 317 feet south of Vintage Ground Cover area: 31.292 square feet This site was re-landscaped due to freeway being installed and 18,692 sq feet was reduced from this site and is now part of CC-26. CC-22 The south side of Vintage from Terrace View Loop to Sierra Crest View Loop. The east and west side of Hillview loop from Vintage to Mt. Rainer CT. Ground Cover area: 11,609 square feet Turf area: 3,763 square feet CC-23 The south side of Banyan from Milliken to Butler Peak PI. The west side of Butler Peak PI. from Banyan to Terrace View Loop. The north side of Terrace View Loop from Butler Peak PI. to Rainbow Falls CT. Ground Cover area: 12,132 square feet CC-24 The north side of Terrace View Loop From EI Capitan CT. to Butler Peak PI The east side of Butler Peak PI. from Terrace View Loop to Banyan. The south side of Banyan from Butler Peak PI. to 990 feet east of Butler Peak PI Ground Cover area:14,452 square feet CC-25 This site was moved to CC-13. This mainline was part of CC-13 and should not of been its own site. P293 CC-26 The east side of Rochester from 210 freeway to Vintage. The north and south side of Vintage from to Rochester to Thunder Mountain. The west side of Rochester from 317 feet south of Vintage to the 210 Freeway. Ground Cover area: 35.037 square feet Due to freeway being built this area was re-landscaped January 7, 2005 and 16, 825 square feet was added to this side. CC-27 The Milliken median and the west side of Milliken from 292 feet south of Vintage to 210 Freeway. Ground Coverarea:13,365 CC-28 The east side of Milliken from Vintage to the 210 freeway right of way. Ground Cover area: 17,724 square feet CC-29 The Milliken median from Banyan to 1420 feet north of Vintage. Ground Cover area: 4.240 square feet P294 Section 2 -Estimate of Costs and Expenses: The budgeted costs for LMD #6 are for direct maintenance of turf, ground cover and shrubs. These functions, along with tree maintenance and certain irrigation system repair and testing, are performed through a Contract Services Agreement the City has with a private landscape maintenance company. The projected costs to operate and maintain LMD #6 are as follows: Personnel Regular Payroll $17,720.00 Part-Time $1, 090.00 Fringe Benefits $8,450.00 Subtotal Personnel $27,260.00 Operations Maintenance and Operations $4,350.00 Contract Services $140,580.00 Tree Maintenance $18,000.00 Water Utilities $115,130.00 Electric Utilities $6,260.00 Assessment Administration $7,020.00 General Overhead $21, 740.00 Subtotal Operations $313,080.00 Total LMD #6 Expenditure Budget $340,340.00 E~enditure of Reserves -$47,770.00 Estimate of Costs 8~ Expenses: $292,570.00 Total EDU Assessment Rate per EDU 1,184.64 $246.97 7 P295 Section 3 -Method of Assessment Apportionment: A. General The 1972 Act permits the establishment of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include construction, maintenance and servicing of public lights, landscaping and appurtenant facilities. The 1972 Act further requires that the cost of these improvements be levied according to special benefit to the assessed properties, rather than the assessed value of said properties: " The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements. " The formula used for calculating assessments in the District therefore reflects the composition of the parcels, and the improvements and services provided, to fairly apportion the costs based on the special benefit received by each assessed parcel. B. Assessment Methodology Equivalent Dwelling Units: To assess benefits equitably, it is necessary to relate the different types of parcel improvements to each other. The Equivalent Dwelling Unit method of apportionment uses the single-family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single family home equals one Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU). Every other land-use is converted to EDU's based on an assessment formula that equates the property's specific development status, type of development (land-use), and size of the property, as compared to asingle-family home (SFR). The EDU method of apportioning benefit is typically seen as the most appropriate and equitable assessment methodology for calculating benefit in districts formed under the 1972 Act, as the benefit to each parcel from improvements are apportioned as a function of land-use type, size and development. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land-use types to determine each parcel's EDU. LAND-USE/EQUIVALENT DWELLING UNITS Property Type EDU Value Multiplier Multi-Family 1.00 Parcel Single Family 1.00 Parcel Commercial/Industrial 2.00 Acre Vacant 0.25 Acre 8 P296 The following table summarizes the assessment rate for the district: Land Use Type Assessment Rate Single Family $246.97/SFD The assessment rate is derived by dividing the total number of EDU within the District by the Total Estimate of Costs ($292,570.00/1,184.64 = $246.97). C. Assessment All assessed lots or parcels within the District are listed on the assessment role, which is on file in the office of the City Clerk and the City Engineer, and are hereby made a part of this Engineer's Report, by reference. The assessment roll states the net amount to be assessed upon all assessable lands within the District for Fiscal Year 2009/10, and describes each assessable lot or parcel of land within the District. These lots and parcels are more particularly described on the County assessment Roll, which is on file in the office of the San Bernardino County Assessor and by reference is made a part of this Engineer's Report. 9 P297 Section 4 -Annexations: Calendar Year 2008 Annexations Landscape Maintenance District No. 6 PROJECT UNITS ANNEX DATE NO ANNEXATIONS 10 P298 CO v.. V 'i w w Iw ,,w J ~ O '6 ^ U ~ ~ Q ~ o ~ c ~ ^~ `- ~ J 1.~ o 1 ~ ~i ~ o E1.~ ~ J 0] ~ j N ~ 3 c m 0 ° C '• ~° ¢` i ~ i _.._ .._ i ny #Se~ in ® ~ L ! i v ~ ny epuennl#3 j ny epuenn!#3 ~ a c e4 ~ ~9 >laa~~ _ . J ._.._ ny ~a#sayoob ny ~a#sayooy ~.. i ny ua~!IIIW r._.._.._.._.. i nH ua>I!II!W i j i ny uaneH i ny uaneH i ny esow~aH . i ny esow~aH nV Pleglyo~y i nV Pleq!yo~H i ny uewllaH ! ~ "~ ny uewllaH ~n L R 1 ny co p~e~(auln i uelawe i '~'i`tEeg`a` i -a ~`, 5~~9 €~e~o pgn ~ s t.._..~ r.._. Bg rS • gageg ~• L B E33 ~E r.._..'S_.._.. .._ .._. m N N O a0 ~t ~ F .p p $.3'9a 'D (n 6 l O Q n¢Y ~F2 s'IlH E .y N >. CO LL , E dig:' ~gct 6~aEE°~~°:d~: y ~ Sged,x we=e EE' o ts. o = m _ E EF qu$°,yE-YE~gEE S~C a ~ 2° z~ .• Q ~ i 5 Ea=z=~° Pig V 8 ~ d - c2 3-. .~., P299 Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2009/2010 City of Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 (North Etiwanda) P300 ENGINEER'S REPORT AFFIDAVIT Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 (North Etiwanda) City of Rancho Cucamonga San Bernardino County, State of California This Report describes the District and all relevant zones therein including the improvements, budgets, parcels and assessments to be levied for Fiscal Year 2009/10, as they existed at the time of the passage of the Resolution of Intention. Reference is hereby made to the San Bernardino County assessor's maps for a detailed description of the lines and dimensions of parcels within the District. The undersigned respectively submits the enclosed Report as directed by the City Council. Dated this 3rd day of June, 2009 Approved by: Mark S DiFe of Engineering Services/City Engineer .-%°~~_ ~^ NaG055Sii v Ezp.S-30.1 1 P301 TABLE OF CONTENTS OVERVIEW ..................................................................................................... 1 SECTION 1 -DESCRIPTION OF IMPROVEMENTS :.................................... 2 SECTION 2 -ESTIMATE OF COSTS AND EXPENSES :............................... 6 SECTION 3 -METHOD OF ASSESSMENT APPORTIONMENT :.................. 7 A. GENERAL .................................................................................................7 B. ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY .................................................................... 7 C. ASSESSMENT ........................................................................................... 8 SECTION 4 -ANNEXATIONS :....................................................................... 9 SECTION 5 -BOUNDARY MAP .................................................................. 10 P302 Overview The Fiscal Year 2009/10 Annual Report for Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 (North Etiwanda) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 1, Chapter 1, Part 2, Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscape and Light Act of 1972, "the 1972 Act"). Section - 1 Description of Improvements The plans and specifications for improvements maintained by Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 ("LMD #7" or the "District") consist of a general description of the nature, location, and the extent of the improvements proposed to be maintained, and are attached hereto. Section - 2 Estimates of Cost and Expenses An estimate of the maintenance cost of the improvements, including incidental costs and expenses in connection therewith for Fiscal Year 2009/10, is set forth on the lists thereof, attached hereto. Section - 3 Method of Assessment Apportionment Discusses the methodology used for calculating assessments in the District. The method reflects the composition of the parcels, and the improvements and services provided, to fairly apportion the costs based on benefit to each parcel. The assessment roll states the net amount to be assessed upon all assessable lands within the District for Fiscal Year 2009/10, and describes each assessable lot or parcel of land within the District. These lots and parcels are more particularly described on the County assessment Roll, which is on file in the office of the San Bernardino County Assessor and by reference is made a part of this Engineer's Report Section - 4 Annexations List the developments, which have annexed to LMD #7 during Calendar year 2008. P303 Section 1 -Description of Improvements: Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 ("LMD #7" or the "District") represents landscape sites throughout the Etiwanda North Area. These sites are associated with areas within that District and as such any special benefit derived from the landscape installation can be directly attributed to parcels within that District. Because of this, assessments required for this district are assessed to parcels within that District only. The various sites maintained by the district consist of parkways, median islands, paseos, street trees, community trails and the Etiwanda Creek Park. The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows: SCHEDULE III LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 7 SITE LOCATIONS June 3, 2009 Site # Descriptive Location EN-1 The North side of Wilson from San Sevaine to Ridgeline: The Eastside of Ridgeline from Wilson to Arcadia, the south side of Arcadia from Ridgeline to 77 feet east of Ridgeline. Ground Cover area: 27,325 square feet Turf area: 19,334 square feet EN-2 The Metropolitan Water District easement on the south side of Crescents Way from San Marino to Ridgeline. Ground Cover area: 38,104 square feet Turf area: 41,250 square feet EN-3 The Wilson Median from Wardman Bullock to San Sevaine. Ground Cover area: 15,706 square feet EN-4 The Planters on the north side of the drainage easement that is between and parallel to Highland and Arapaho east of Etiwanda Ave. Ground Cover area: 63,972 square feet 2 P304 EN-5 EN-6 The south side of Wilson from 1,115 feet west of San Sevaine to 205 feet east of San Sevaine. The Landscape east of San Sevaine from 24th to south end tract. Ground Cover area Turf area: of Ridgeline from Wilson to 120 feet north of Arcadia. Ground Cover area: 29,226 square feet Turf area: 15,136 square feet 45,584 square feet 3.527 square feet The north side of Wilson from Wardman Bullock to Ridgeline. The west side EN-7 The parkway on the eastside of Wardman Bullock from 24th street to 857 feet north of Glendora. The cobblestone between the tract wall and the flood wall will be handled as as extra for debris pickup and weed control on an as needed basis. Ground Cover area: 10,268 square feet EN-8 The south side of Crescenta Way from Ridgeline to Crestline. Ground Cover area: 50,305 square feet Turf area: 35.960 square feet EN-9 The paseo from Meadow Brook to Rock Creek Road. Ground Cover area: 1,400 square feet Turf area: 6.555 square feet EN-10 The paseo from Etiwanda to North Rim Way. The west side of Etiwanda from 175 feet north of North Rim Way to 171 feet south of Golden Prarie Drive. Ground Cover area: 49,020 square feet Turf area: 4,445 square feet EN-11 The paseo south of Ridge Crest Drive to southern boundary of Tract 14139. This site is temporarily maintained by another contractor and was deleted from the contract as of 7-16-01, however, this site is still the city's property. Old Ground Cover area:3,548 square feet Old Turf area: 800 square feet EN-12 The cul-de-sac on the north side of Ridgecrest at Etiwanda Creek Channel. Ground Cover area: 1,870 square feet Turf area: 700 square feet EN-13 The east side of San Sevaine from Wilson to 136 feet north of Crescenta. Ground Cover area:46,611 square feet Turf area: 5,037 square feet P305 EN-14 The west side of San Sevaine from 150' north of Wilson to 136' north of Crescenta. Ground Cover area: 55,166 square feet Turf area: 235 square feet EN-15 The north side of Youngs Canyon Road from 500 feet east of Koch to 692 feet west of Koch. The south side of Youngs Canyon Road from 349 feet east of Koch to 692 feet west of Koch. The east and west side of Koch place from Youngs Canyon Road to 132 feet north of Youngs Canyon Road. The west side of Koch from Youngs Canyon Road to 132 feet south of Youngs Canyon Road. The east side of Koch from 82 feet south of Youngs Canyon Road to Youngs Canyon Road. The trailhead north east of the east end of Youngs Canyon Road to the south end of San Sevaine Horse Trail. The south end of San Sevaine Horse from the trail head to 254 feet north of trailhead. Ground Coverarea:42,925 square feet EN-16 The east side of Wardman Bullock from 225 feet south of San Segundo Drive to 80 feet north of Dona Way. Ground Cover area: 2,056 square feet EN-17 The north side of Colonbero from San Sevaine Channel to Guidera Drive. The south side of Colonbero from San Sevaine Channel to 400 feet north of Guidera Drive. The north side of Aggazzotti from Colonbero to 475 feet east of Colonbero. This site has a pump which will be adjusted and maintained by city personnel. Ground Cover area:43,241 square feet EN-18 The north side of Aggazzotti Road from San Antonio Drive to San Sevaine Road. The west side of San Sevaine road from Aggazzotti to 702 feet south of Aggazzotti. The East side of San Sevaine Road from 702 feet south of Aggazzotti to Regina. Ground Cover area:47,823 square feet EN-19 The south side of Wilson from Etiwanda to Estates Way. Ground Cover area: 45,727 square feet EN-20 The south side or Wilson from Estates Way to Hanley. Ground Coverarea:14,207 square feet EN-21 The north side of Wilson from Etiwanda to Cervantes. The Wilson median from Etiwanda To Cervantes. The Westside of Etiwanda From Wilson To Del Norte Place. Ground Cover area: 88.795 square feet 4 P306 EN-22 The north and south side of Vintage from 165 feet east of Country View to 338 feet west of Country View. Ground Coverarea:13,603 square feet EN-23 The north side of Wilson and median from Etiwanda west to Etiwanda. The eastside of Etiwanda from Wilson to 1150 feet north of Wilson. Ground Cover area: 32,027 square feet EN-24 The north side of Vintage from 360 feet west of Ascot to 230 feet east of Countrywood. Ground Cover area: 34,707 square feet EN-25 The eastside of Bluegrass from Banyan to 610 feet north of Banyan. Ground Cover area: 4,054 square feet EN-26 The south side of Banyan from Bluegrass to Greenwood. Ground Cover area: 6,240 square feet EN-27 The south side of Banyan from Laurel Blossom to Etiwanda. Ground Cover area: 1,703 square feet EN-28 The north side of Wilson from Cervantes to 1715 feet west of Cervantes. The west side of Cervantes from Carmel Knolls Drive to Wilson. The paseo from Wilson to Tejas Ct. The median on Wilson from Cervantes to Bluegrass. The following temporary landscape: There is 1 planter on the west side of Altura at Tejas. There are five planters on the south side of Tejas from Altura to 195 feet east of Altura. Ground Cover area:25,048 square feet EN-30 The east side of Bluegrass Ave from 257 feet south of Churchill Drive to 418 feet north of Churchill Drive. Ground Cover area: 9,303 square feet 5 P307 Section 2 -Estimate of Costs and Expenses: The budgeted costs for LMD #7 are for direct maintenance of turf, ground cover, shrubs and parks. These functions, along with tree maintenance and certain irrigation system repair and testing, are performed through a Contract Services Agreement the City has with a private landscape maintenance company. The projected costs to operate and maintain LMD #7 are as follows: Personnel Regular Payroll 154,200.00 Part-time Salaries 10,380.00 Fringe Benefits 73,610.00 Subtotal Personnel 238,190.00 Operations Mainterence and Operations 43,860.00 Mainterence and Operations- Facilities $2,800.00 Vehicle Maintenance and Operations $2,500.00 Contrail Services $360,080.00 Contract Services -Facilities $4,200.00 Tree Maintenance $6,950.00 Water Utilities $236,340.00 Telephone Utilities $770.00 Electric Utilities $23,770.00 Assessment Administration $15,080.00 General Overhead $58,260.00 Subtotal Operations 754,610.00 Capital Outlay Building & Improvements 0 Vehicles $0.00 Subtotal -Capital Outlay $0.00 Total LMD #7 Expenditure Budget $992,800.00 Expenditure of Reserves X222,130.00 Estimate of Casts 8 Expenses: $770,670.00 Total EDU 2,509.91 Assessment Rate per EDU $307.05 6 P308 Section 3 -Method of Assessment Apportionment: A. General The 1972 Act permits the establishment of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include construction, maintenance and servicing of public lights, landscaping and appurtenant facilities. The 1972 Act further requires that the cost of these improvements be levied according to special benefit to the assessed properties, rather than the assessed value of said properties: "The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements." The formula used for calculating assessments in the District therefore reflects the composition of the parcels, and the improvements and services provided, to fairly apportion the costs based on the special benefit received by each assessed parcel. B. Assessment Methodology Equivalent Dwelling Units: To assess benefits equitably, it is necessary to relate the different types of parcel improvements to each other. The Equivalent Dwelling Unit method of apportionment uses the single-family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single family home equals one Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU). Every other land-use is converted to EDU's based on an assessment formula that equates the property's specific development status, type of development (land-use), and size of the property, as compared to asingle-family home (SFR). The EDU method of apportioning benefit is typically seen as the most appropriate and equitable assessment methodology for calculating benefit in districts formed under the 1972 Act, as the benefit to each parcel from improvements are apportioned as a function of land-use type, size and development. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land-use types to determine each parcel's EDU. LAND-USE/EQUIVALENT DWELLING UNITS Property Type EDU Value Multiplii Multi-Family 1.00 Parcel Single Family 1.00 Parcel Comm/Ind 2.00 Acre Vacant 0.25 Acre 7 P309 The following table summarizes the assessment rate for the district: Land Use Type Assessment Rate Single Family $307.05/SFD The assessment rate is derived by dividing the total number of EDU within the District by the Total Estimate of Costs ($770,670.00/2,509.91 = $307.05). C. Assessment All assessed lots or parcels within the District are listed on the assessment role, which is on file in the office of the City Clerk and the City Engineer, and are hereby made a part of this Engineer's Report, by reference. The assessment roll states the net amount to be assessed upon all assessable lands within the District for Fiscal Year 2009/10, and describes each assessable lot or parcel of land within the District. These lots and parcels are more particularly described on the County assessment Roll, which is on file in the office of the San Bernardino County Assessor and by reference is made a part of this Engineer's Report. 8 P310 Section 4 -Annexations: Calendar Year 2008 Annexations Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 PROJECT UNITS ANNEX DATE 13254 BANYAN AVE 1 SFR 7/16/2008 P311 ~ a~ ~.+ ~ ~ V .~ ,y J ~ ~ ~ .. ~ U ~ ~n ~ ~ ~ ~ V ~ ~ r••~~ _ _ ~ ~ J '~' o ^~ ~ N W ~ *r C O ~ ~ m ~ ~ s ~ m ~ o ~° Q ~ _.._.._ i ny lSe~ cn ~ ~ v (~ $ ny epuenn!~~ J ~.. ~~ ..-•-- i ny ~aasayao~ ~ ny ~a;say~o~{ r"' i ny ua~{!II!W i n`d u ~I!II!W i i i ny uaneH ; ny uaneH 1 i ny esow~aH i ny esow~aH i ny pleq!yo~y . ny Pleq!y~~d i i ny uewllaH i ~~ "~ ny uewllaH i •~ •• s ~ i . ny p e~(au!n 1 ore°.:9t•s~r ~S ue!lauae~ ~P~~~~~~_it i a ,~ •r.. ;c~g a~y~Rg ~ ' ••' LPZ~s~~ B~P~ j a t* _ ;sails ~;o~ ~. _.._., ~ ._..~ • ny anal s~.~f~Fa~a s (n t 8 gg e ~ C m LL ¢ ~a^S~E~L'~;~~R N m Pg 3€~~~~~~r b~C~aB~P"~~ < < ~~nQ~sFT~~~`y U =_'~'::g~~a~_ P312 Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2009/2010 City of Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 (South Etiwanda) P313 ENGINEER'S REPORT AFFIDAVIT Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 (South Etiwanda) City of Rancho Cucamonga San Bernardino County, State of California This Report describes the District and all relevant zones therein including the improvements, budgets, parcels and assessments to be levied for Fiscal Year 2009/10, as they existed at the time of the passage of the Resolution of Intention. Reference is hereby made to the San Bernardino County assessor's maps for a detailed description of the lines and dimensions of parcels within the District. The undersigned respectively submits the enclosed Report as directed by the City Council. Dated this 3`d day of June Approved Mark~ua[.Direcf6r of Engineering Services/City Engineer ~F€SS/p~. a"" cW\~~cF•~. 'Y.. „J ~,'~ I x 1 ~ ~ Ezp.c~3G-1 1 ~cr CM\. a~P 9~Of CAl\F~Q` P314 TABLE OF CONTENTS OVERVIEW ..............................................................................................1 SECTION 1 -DESCRIPTION OF IMPROVEMENTS :.............................2 SECTION 2 -ESTIMATE OF COSTS AND EXPENSES :........................3 SECTION 3 -METHOD OF ASSESSMENT APPORTIONMENT:...........3 SECTION 3 -METHOD OF ASSESSMENT APPORTIONMENT:...........4 A. GENERAL ..........................................................................................4 B. ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY .............................................................4 C. ASSESSMENT ....................................................................................5 SECTION 4 -ANNEXATIONS :................................................................6 SECTION 5 -BOUNDARY MAP .............................................................7 P315 Overview The Fiscal Year 2009/10 Annual Report for Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 (South Etiwanda) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 1, Chapter 1, Part 2, Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscape and Light Act of 1972, "the 1972 Act"). Section -1 Description of Improvements The plans and specifications for improvements maintained by Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 ("LMD #" or the "District") consist of a general description of the nature, location, and the extent of the improvements proposed to be maintained. and are attached hereto. Section - 2 Estimates of Cost and Expenses An estimate of the maintenance cost of the improvements, including incidental costs and expenses in connection therewith for Fiscal Year 2009/10, is set forth on the lists thereof. attached hereto. Section - 3 Method of Assessment Apportionment Discusses the methodology used for calculating assessments in the District. The method reflects the composition of the parcels, and the improvements and services provided, to fairly apportion the costs based on benefit to each parcel. The assessment roll states the net amount to be assessed upon all assessable lands within the District for Fiscal Year 2009/10, and describes each assessable lot or parcel of land within the District. These lots and parcels are more particularly described on the County assessment Roll, which is on file in the office of the San Bernardino County Assessor and by reference is made a part of this Engineer's Report Section - 4 Annexations List the developments, which have annexed to LMD #8 during Calendar year 2008. P316 Section 1 -Description of Improvements: Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 (LMD #8) represents landscape sites throughout the Etiwanda South Area. These sites are associated with areas within that district and as such any benefit derived from the landscape installation can be directly attributed to those parcels within that district. Because of this, assessments required for this district are charged to those parcels within that district. The various sites maintained by the district consist of parkways, median islands, paseos, street trees and community trails. The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows: LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 8 SITE LOCATIONS June 3, 2009 Site # Descriptive Location SE-1 The east side of East from 480 feet south of Catalpa to 182 feet north of Catalpa. The north and south side of Catalpa from; East Ave. to Brownstone. Ground Cover area: 10,355 square feet Turf area: 6,258 square feet SE-2 The south side of Highland from 361 feet east of East Avenue, to 210 feet east of Starstone. Ground Cover area: 16,686 square feet SE-3 The south side of Fischer from 860 feet West of Mulberry to Mulberry. The north Side of Fisher from Mulberry to East Avenue Ground Cover area: 53,646 square feet SE-4 The north side of Mueller, from 40 feet past the east end of Mueller, to 20 feet east of Dicarlo. Ground Cover area: 9,420 square feet SE-5 The north and south side of Highland Avenue, from 217 feet west of Norcia Drive to 210 feet east of Dicarlo Place. Ground Cover area: 12,471 square feet SE-6 The south side of Carnesi Drive from Etiwanda Avenue to 395 feet east of Murietta Court. Ground Cover area: 8,919 square feet P317 Section 2 -Estimate of Costs and Expenses: The budgeted costs for LMD #8 are for direct maintenance of turf, ground cover and shrubs. These functions, along with tree maintenance and certain irrigation system repair and testing, are performed through a Contract Services Agreement the City has with a private landscape maintenance company. The projected costs to operate and maintain LMD #8 are as follows: Operations Maintenance and Operations Contract Services Tree Main~nance Water Utilities Telephone Utilities Electric Utilties Assessment Administration General Overhead Subtotal Operations $0.00 $11,750.00 $5,500.00 $18,110.00 $0.00 $1,310.00 $1,030.00 $1,970.00 $39,670.00 Total LMD #8 Expenditure Budget $39,670.00 Expend'rtu re of Reserves ~ 13,100.00 Estimate of Costs 8 Expenses: $26,570.00 Total EDU Assessment Rate per EDU 175.44 $151.45 3 P318 Section 3 -Method of Assessment Apportionment: A. General The 1972 Act permits the establishment of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include construction, maintenance and servicing of public lights, landscaping and appurtenant facilities. The 1972 Act further requires that the cost of these improvements be levied according to special benefit to the assessed properties, rather than the assessed value of said properties: "The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements." The formula used for calculating assessments in the District therefore reflects the composition of the parcels, and the improvements and services provided, to fairly apportion the costs based on the special benefit received by each assessed parcel. B. Assessment Methodology Equivalent Dwelling Units: To assess benefits equitably, it is necessary to relate the different types of parcel improvements to each other. The Equivalent Dwelling Unit method of apportionment uses the single-family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single family home equals one Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU). Every other land-use is converted to EDU's based on an assessment formula that equates the property's specific development status, type of development (land-use), and size of the property, as compared to asingle-family home (SFR). The EDU method of apportioning benefit is typically seen as the most appropriate and equitable assessment methodology for calculating benefit in districts formed under the 1972 Act, as the benefit to each parcel from improvements are apportioned as a function of land-use type, size and development. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land-use types to determine each parcel's EDU. LAND-USE/EQUIVALENT DWELLING UNITS EDU Value Multi-Family 1.00 Single Family 1.00 Commercial/Industrial 2.00 Vacant 0.25 ier Parcel Acre Acre 4 P319 The following table summarizes the assessment rate for the district: Land Use Type Assessment Rate Single Family $151.45/SFD The assessment rate is derived by dividing the total number of EDU within the District by the Total Estimate of Costs ($26,570.00/175.44 = $151.45). C. Assessment All assessed lots or parcels within the District are listed on the assessment role, which is on file in the office of the City Clerk and the City Engineer, and are hereby made a part of this Engineer's Report, by reference. The assessment roll states the net amount to be assessed upon all assessable lands within the District for Fiscal Year 2009/10, and describes each assessable lot or parcel of land within the District. These lots and parcels are more particularly described on the County assessment Roll, which is on file in the office of the San Bernardino County Assessor and by reference is made a part of this Engineer's Report. 5 P320 Section 4 -Annexations: Calendar Year 2007 Annexations Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 PROJECT UNITS ANNEX DATE NO ANNEXAl10NS P32 v DO ~.. V 'i "„ ;_ N J Q ~ Q ~ ~ ~ ® N C O C ~ y J tir ° ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ m ~ 1 ~ .~ ~ ~ 0 3 m ° a` i _.._ ~ i ® .._i^Hlse~ in i L ~ ! v ~ i ny epuennl;3 ny epuenn!;3 a c ~ ~8 >laa~~ ep J •_.._.._.._.._.._.._..I ny ~a;sayooa ny ~a;sayooa ~.. i ny ua~!IIIW r._.._.._..- ny ua~!II!W i i i i ny uaneH ~ ny uaneH i ny esow~aH . ~ ny esow~aH i nV Ple4!4o~H p nV PIeQ!4o~V i ny uewllaH ~ '..~• "~ ny uewllaH I •, ~ ~ ~ V ~ ny p~e~tau!~ 6 P` C e Ps` ,a~ i ~•-: _ ;fig: E€~~~` .~'' ~ ~_ ~ z,~~'G@f93~B1a, o'~ m •p~~E°~g'$°e _~ z g~•laa°g~s~~ ~.5 ~ggg;e8~ . V ~i~c5?F a~se P322 Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2009/2010 City of Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 (Lower Etiwanda) P323 ENGINEER'S REPORT AFFIDAVIT Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 (Lower Etiwanda) City of Rancho Cucamonga San Bernardino County, State of California This Report describes the District and all relevant zones therein including the improvements, budgets, parcels and assessments to be levied for Fiscal Year 2009/10, as they existed at the time of the passage of the Resolution of Intention. Reference is hereby made to the San Bernardino County assessor's maps for a detailed description of the lines and dimensions of parcels within the District. The undersigned respectively submits the enclosed Report as directed by the City Council. Dated this 3rd day of June Approved by: erector of Engineering Services/City Engineer tb. 0059872 6~.6,90~1 ~ P324 TABLE OF CONTENTS OVERVIEW .............................................................................................. 1 SECTION 1 -DESCRIPTION OF IMPROVEMENTS :............................. 2 SECTION 2 -ESTIMATE OF COSTS AND EXPENSES :........................ 4 SECTION 3 -METHOD OF ASSESSMENT APPORTIONMENT:........... 4 SECTION 3 -METHOD OF ASSESSMENT APPORTIONMENT:........... 5 A. GENERAL .......................................................................................... 5 B. ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY ............................................................. 5 C. ASSESSMENT .................................................................................... 6 SECTION 4 -ANNEXATIONS :................................................................ 7 SECTION 5 -BOUNDARY MAP ............................................................. 8 P325 Overview The Fiscal Year 2009/10 Annual Report for Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 (Lower Etiwanda) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 1, Chapter 1, Part 2, Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscape and Light Act of 1972, "the 1972 Act"). Section -1 Description of Improvements The plans and specifications for improvements maintained by Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 ("LMD #9" or the "District") consist of a general description of the nature, location, and the extent of the improvements proposed to be maintained, and are attached hereto. Section - 2 Estimates of Cost and Expenses An estimate of the maintenance cost of the improvements, including incidental costs and expenses in connection therewith for Fiscal Year 2009/10, is set forth on the lists thereof, attached hereto. Section - 3 Method of Assessment Apportionment Discusses the methodology used for calculating assessments in the District. The method reflects the composition of the parcels, and the improvements and services provided, to fairly apportion the costs based on benefit to each parcel. The assessment roll states the net amount to be assessed upon all assessable lands within the District for Fiscal Year 2009/10, and describes each assessable lot or parcel of land within the District. These lots and parcels are more particularly described on the County assessment Roll, which is on file in the office of the San Bernardino County Assessor and by reference is made a part of this Engineer's Report Section - 4 Annexations List the developments, which have annexed to LMD #9 during Calendar year 2008. P326 Section 1 -Description of Improvements: Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 (LMD #9) represents landscape sites throughout the Lower Etiwanda Area. These sites are associated with areas within that district and as such any special benefit derived from the landscape installation and maintenance can be directly attributed to the parcels within that District. Because of this, assessments required for this District are assessed to parcels within that District only. The following is a summary of area and acreage maintained by the district: Tvpe Area Landscape 137,213 squarefeet Parks 5.5 acres Trails 0.40 acres The various sites maintained by the district consist of parkways, median islands, street trees and South Etiwanda Park. The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows: SCHEDULE IV LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 8 SITE LOCATIONS June 3, 2009 Site # Descriptive Location 9-1 The west side of East Ave. from 380 feet north of Chateau to 290 feet south of Chateau. Ground Cover area: 4,426 square feet Hardscape area: 7,360 square feet P327 9-2 The west side of East Ave. from 339 feet north of Brookfield to 157 feet north of Brookfield. Brookfield from East Ave. to Oak Crest. The east side of Oak Crest to 137 feet north of Brookfield. Ground Cover area: 2,390 square feet Hardscape area: 6,874 square feet 9-3 The west side of East Ave. from 790 feet north of Highfield to 256 feet south of Highfield. Ground Cover area: 8,769 square feet Hardscape area: 10,669 square feet 9-4 The west side of East Ave. From 295 feet north of Via Veneto To Via Veneto. The north side of Via Veneto From East Ave to Dolcetto. The east side of Dolcetto from Via Veneto to Miller Ave. The south side of Miller Ave from 372 feet west of Dolcetto to 240 feet east of Dolcetto. The west side of Dolcetto from Miller to Garcia. The north side of Garcia from Dolcetto to Etiwanda Ave. Ground Cover area: 48,612 square feet Hardscape area: 28,746 square feet 9-5 The north side of Miller from 429 feet west of Dolcetto to 1029 feet west of Dolcetto Ground Cover area: 6,519 square feet Hardscape area: 3,325 square feet 9-6 The north side of Miller From 254 feet east of Dolcetto to 167 feet west of Dolcetto. Ground Cover area: 4-,089 square feet Hardscape area: 2,854 square feet 9-7 The south side of Lima, from 167 feet west of Brisas, to Green Glen. Ground Cover area: 2,580 square feet 9-9 The north side of Candlewood St from Exbury St to Etiwanda Avenue. Ground Cover area: 3,362 square feet Hardscape area: 786 square feet 3 P328 Section 2 -Estimate of Costs and Expenses: The budgeted costs for LMD #9 are for direct maintenance of turf, ground cover, shrubs and parks. These functions, along with tree maintenance and certain irrigation system repair and testing, are performed through a Contract Services Agreement the City has with a private landscape maintenance company. The projected costs to operate and maintain LMD #9 are as follows: Personnel Regular Salaries $184,070.00 Part-time Salaries $7,860.00 Fringe Benefits $87,370.00 Subtotal Personnel $279,300.00 Operations Mainterence and Operations $7,940.00 Maintenance and Operations - Fadldies $2,000.00 Emergency & Routine Vehide Equipment Rental $200.00 Contrail Services $71,860.00 Contrail Services - Fadlities $4,000.00 Tree Main~nance $6,600.00 Water Utilities $29,700.00 Electric Utilities $5,020.00 Assessment Administration $8,750.00 General Overhead $54,810.00 Subtotal Operations $190,880.00 Capital ExperMitures OutlayNehides $0.00 Outlay/Equipment $0.00 Outlay/Capital Project $0.00 Subtotal Capital Expenditures $0.00 TotaILMD#9Expendr~ureBudget $470,180.00 Contribution to Reserves $240.800.00 Estimate of Costs 8 Expenses: $710,980.00 Total EDU 1,832.70 Assessment Rate per EDU $387.94 4 P329 Section 3 -Method of Assessment Apportionment: A. General The 1972 Act permits the establishment of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include construction, maintenance and servicing of public lights, landscaping and appurtenant facilities. The 1972 Act further requires that the cost of these improvements be levied according to special benefit to the assessed properties, rather than the assessed value of said properties: "The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements." The formula used for calculating assessments in the District therefore reflects the composition of the parcels, and the improvements and services provided, to fairly apportion the costs based on the special benefit received by each assessed parcel. B. Assessment Methodology Equivalent Dwelling Units: To assess benefits equitably, it is necessary to relate the different types of parcel improvements to each other. The Equivalent Dwelling Unit method of apportionment uses the single-family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single family home equals one Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU). Every other land-use is converted to EDU's based on an assessment formula that equates the property's specific development status, type of development (land-use), and size of the property, as compared to asingle-family home (SFR). The EDU method of apportioning benefit is typically seen as the most appropriate and equitable assessment methodology for calculating benefit in districts formed under the 1972 Act, as the benefit to each parcel from improvements are apportioned as a function of land-use type, size and development. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land-use types to determine each parcel's EDU. LAND-USE/EQUIVALENT DWELLING UNITS Property Type Commercial/Industrial Vacant Single Family Multi-Family EDU Value tier 2.00 Acre 0.25 Acre 1.00 Unit 1.00 Unit 5 P330 The following table summarizes the assessment rate for the district: Land Use Type Single Family Multi-Family Commercial/Industrial Assessment Rate $387.94/SFD $387.94/DU $775.88/Acre The assessment rate is derived by dividing the total number of EDU within the District by the Total Estimate of Costs ($710,980.00/1,832.70 = $387.94). C. Assessment All assessed lots or parcels within the District are listed on the assessment role, which is on file in the office of the City Clerk and the City Engineer, and are hereby made a part of this Engineer's Report, by reference. The assessment roll states the net amount to be assessed upon all assessable lands within the District for Fiscal Year 2009110, and describes each assessable lot or parcel of land within the District. These lots and parcels are more particularly described on the County assessment Roll, which is on file in the office of the San Bernardino County Assessor and by reference is made a part of this Engineer's Report. 6 P331 Section 4 -Annexations: Calendar Year 2008 Annexations Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 PROJECT UNITS ANNIX DATE TR17919 50 SFR 7/16/2008 7 P332 ~ ~ v~ V 'L N J ~ O 13 ~ J ~ ~ Q C C o N C C J tir ° ~ .n N ._ ._.._.._.._ ~ ~ j ~ O `IV C i c J N m ~ a~ j N - L ~ m O O ~ ti Q I G1 i _.. _ .._ind~se3 in ~ ® j L ~ i n e uen~ ~ ny epuenn!33 y p g3 ~ i a j c ~ ~9 >laa~~ eQ. ._.._.. - J ~ ny ~alsayoob ny ~a;sayoob ~.. i ny ua~!p!W f._.._.._..- i ny ua~!II!W i i i ny uaneH j ny uaneH i _ ny esow~aH ; ny esow~aH nV pleq!yo~V j nb' Pleq!4o~V i i ~ ° ~ ny uewllaH ny uewllaH ..~ ~ ' n L ~ L V ny p~e~(au!n i e€€~€:~~.a. lS ue!lawe~ :, dP;e ~ Fga,s •I V a 1 . a ~ ~ '>3'~_agor~~ ~ ~ .~. g~FpV 8 ~ E L J _ ~ FB55 ` EE gE -O ~ m O Q ~niC E°E a:3 K C T LL sgy=,,. g ~ g d ~ Pen~ ~ : ¢ °2f f/1 l0 g iPS FEE `n _ = Q] ELEY faE~ ssa p ~ v° ga3§pe ' ~a U Ss?: €?~reise P333 Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2009/2010 City of Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 10 (Rancho Etiwanda) P334 ENGINEER'S REPORT AFFIDAVIT Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 10 (Rancho Etiwanda) City of Rancho Cucamonga San Bernardino County, State of California This Report describes the District and all relevant zones therein including the improvements, budgets, parcels and assessments to be levied for Fiscal Year 2009/10, as they existed at the time of the passage of the Resolution of Intention. Reference is hereby made to the San Bernardino County assessor's maps for a detailed description of the lines and dimensions of parcels within the District. The undersigned respectively submits the enclosed Report as directed by the City Council. Dated this 3`d day of June, 2009 Approved by: r of Engineering Services/City Engineer 1~0. C053572 ' Exp. 6.3C` 1 7 L'.1' P335 TABLE OF CONTENTS OVERVIEW ..............................................................................................1 SECTION 1 -DESCRIPTION OF IMPROVEMENTS :.............................2 SECTION 2 -ESTIMATE OF COSTS AND EXPENSES :........................4 SECTION 3 -METHOD OF ASSESSMENT APPORTIONMENT:...........5 A. GENERAL .......................................................................................... 5 B. ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY .............................................................5 C. ASSESSMENT ....................................................................................6 SECTION 4 -ANNEXATIONS :................................................................7 SECTION 5 -BOUNDARY MAP .............................................................8 P336 Overview The Fiscal Year 2009/10 Annual Report for Landscape Maintenance District No. 10 (Rancho Etiwanda) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 1, Chapter 1, Part 2, Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscape and Light Act of 1972, "the 1972 Act"). Section - 1 Description of Improvements The plans and specifications for improvements maintained by Landscape Maintenance District No. 10 ("LMD #10" or the "District") consist of a general description of the nature, location, and the extent of the improvements proposed to be maintained, and are attached hereto. Section - 2 Estimates of Cost and Expenses An estimate of the maintenance cost of the improvements, including incidental costs and expenses in connection therewith for Fiscal Year 2009/10, is set forth on the lists thereof. attached hereto. Section - 3 Method of Assessment Apportionment Discusses the methodology used for calculating assessments in the District. The method reflects the composition of the parcels, and the improvements and services provided, to fairly apportion the costs based on benefit to each parcel. The assessment roll states the net amount to be assessed upon all assessable lands within the District for Fiscal Year 2009/10, and describes each assessable lot or parcel of land within the District. These lots and parcels are more particularly described on the County assessment Roll, which is on file in the office of the San Bernardino County Assessor and by reference is made a part of this Engineer's Report Section - 4 Annexations List the developments, which have annexed to LMD #10 during Calendar year 2008. P337 Section 1 -Description of Improvements: Landscape Maintenance District No. 10 ("LMD #10" or the "District") represents landscape sites throughout the Rancho Etiwanda Area. These sites are associated with areas within that District and as such any special benefit derived from the landscape installation can be directly attributed to the parcels within that District. Because of this, assessments required for this District are assessed to parcels within that District only. The following is a summary of area and acreage maintained by the district: Type Area Landscape 271,355 square feet Parks 11 acres Trails 1.63 acres The various sites maintained by the district consist of parkways, median islands, street trees, community trails and Day Creek Park. The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows: SCHEDULE IV LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 10 SITE LOCATIONS June 3, 2009 Site # Descriptive Location 10-1 The west side of Day Creek from 790 feet north of Richfield to Wilson. The north side of Wilson from Day Creek to 227 feet west of Day Creek. This site overlaps 10-2. Ground Cover area: 16,941 square feet Hardscape area: 3,589 square feet 10-2 The north and south side of Wilson from 497 feet west of Alvarado to Day Creek with 1 station at top of highest retaining wall on corner of Wilson and Day Creek. This station overlaps site 10-1. The south side of Wilson from Day Creek to Bluegrass. The Wilson median from Day Creek to Bluegrass. Ground Cover area: 47,275 square feet Hardscape area: 6,444 square feet 2 P338 10-3 The west side of Day Creek from Wilson to 144 feet south of Clydesdale. The Day Creek median from Wilson to Banyan. Ground Cover area: 32,619 square feet Hardscape area: 10,983 square feet 10-4 The east side of Day Creek from 648 feet south of Keenland to Wilson. Ground Cover area: 15,952 square feet Hardscape area: 4,365 square feet 10-5 The west side of Bluegrass from Wilson to 705 feet south of Challendon. Ground Cover area: 26,882 square feet Hardscape area: 12,220 square feet 10-6 The south side of Banyan from Rochester to Day Creek. The north side of Banyan from 427 feet west of Rocking Horse to Rocking Horse. The west side of Day Creek from Banyan to Vintage. The Day Creek median from Banyan to Vintage. The north side of Vintage from Day Creek to paseo ending 153 feet west of Sand Hill. Ground Cover area: 44,000 square feet Hardscape area: 16,197 square feet 10-7 The north side of Vintage from 180 feet east of Taylor Canyon Place to Day Creek. The east side of Day Creek from Vintage to Banyan. The south side of Banyan from Day Creek to Bluegrass. Ground Cover area: 22,164 square feet Hardscape area: 11,724 square feet 10-8 The landscape against the south side facing wall north of the 210 freeway from the top of the slope on the east side of Day Creek to 300 feet eastward. The Day Creek median from the 210 freeway to Vintage. The east side of Day Creek from Caltrans ROW to Vintage. The south side of Vintage from Day Creek to 180 feet east of Taylor Canyon. Ground Cover area: 16,841 square feet Hardscape area: 7,025 square feet 10-9 The north side of Coyote from Brookstone Place to Day Creek. The east side of Day Creek from Coyote to 358 feet north of Coyote. Ground cover area: 8,488 square feet Hardscape area: 5,752 square feet Ground cover, shrubs and turf areas that make up parkways, median islands and paseos are maintained under contract by a private landscape maintenance company. Parks are maintained by the City's Park Maintenance Crews. P339 Section 2 -Estimate of Costs and Expenses: The budgeted costs for LMD #10 are for direct maintenance of turf, ground cover, shrubs and parks. These functions, along with tree maintenance and certain irrigation system repair and testing, are performed through a Contract Services Agreement the City has with a private landscape maintenance company. The projected costs to operate and maintain LMD #10 are as follows: FISCAL YEAR 2009110 ESTIMATED BUDGET $425,110.00 Personnel Regular Salaries $144,860.00 Over Time $1,050.00 Part-time Salaries $27,590.00 Fringe Benefits $71,110.00 Subtotal Personnel $244,610.00 Operations Maintenance and Operations $18,790.00 Maintenance and Operations- Facilities $4,000.00 Equipment Maintenance $1,000.00 Emergency Equipment& Rental $1,000.00 Contract Services $124,880.00 Contract Services -Facilities $9,000.00 Tree Man~nance $6,860.00 Water Utilities $84,020.00 Electric Utilities $70,680.00 Assessment Administration $4,130.00 General Overhead $31,410.00 Subtotal Operations $355,770.00 Capital E~enditures Outlay/Equipment $16,000.00 OutlayNehicles $29,000.00 Subtotal Capital Expenditures $45,000.00 Total LMD #10 Expenditure Budget $645,380.00 Transferan from Reserves -$220,270.00 Estimate of Costs & Expenses: $425,110.00 Total EDU 689.89 Assessment Rate per EDU $616.20 P340 Section 3 -Method of Assessment Apportionment: A. General The 1972 Act permits the establishment of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include construction, maintenance and servicing of public lights, landscaping and appurtenant facilities. The 1972 Act further requires that the cost of these improvements be levied according to special benefit to the assessed properties, rather than the assessed value of said properties: " The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements." The formula used for calculating assessments in the District therefore reflects the composition of the parcels, and the improvements and services provided, to fairly apportion the costs based on the special benefit received by each assessed parcel. B. Assessment Methodology Equivalent Dwelling Units: To assess benefits equitably, it is necessary to relate the different types of parcel improvements to each other. The Equivalent Dwelling Unit method of apportionment uses the single-family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single family home equals one Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU). Every other land-use is converted to EDU's based on an assessment formula that equates the property's specific development status, type of development (land-use), and size of the property, as compared to asingle-family home (SFR). The EDU method of apportioning benefit is typically seen as the most appropriate and equitable assessment methodology for calculating benefit in districts formed under the 1972 Act, as the benefit to each parcel from improvements are apportioned as a function of land-use type, size and development. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land-use types to determine each parcel's EDU. LAND-USE/EQUIVALENT DWELLING UNITS EDU Value ential Improved Vacant Multi-Family Residential Single Family Residential 2.00 Acres 0.25 Acres 1.00 Unit 1.00 Unit 5 P341 The following table summarizes the assessment rate for the district: Land Use Type Single Family Commercial/Industrial Assessment Rate $616.20/SFD $1,232.40/Acre The assessment rate is derived by dividing the total number of EDU within the District by the Total Estimate of Costs ($425,110.00/689.89 = $616.20). C. Assessment All assessed lots or parcels within the District are listed on the assessment role, which is on file in the office of the City Clerk and the City Engineer, and are hereby made a part of this Engineer's Report, by reference. The assessment roll states the net amount to be assessed upon all assessable lands within the District for Fiscal Year 2009/10, and describes each assessable lot or parcel of land within the District. These lots and parcels are more particularly described on the County assessment Roll, which is on file in the office of the San Bernardino County Assessor and by reference is made a part of this Engineer's Report. 6 P342 Section 4 -Annexations: Calendar Year 2008 Annexations Landscape Maintenance District No. 10 PROJECT UNITS ANNEX DATE NO ANNEXATIONS P343 O ~ ~~ v.+ V N 'i y w o O Q ~ ~ ~ ~ r•x 0 y 5 d .~ C ~ J ° ° ~ N j ~ ~ C O ~J - J CO ~ ! ' N y s 3 ~ m m o ~ " ¢ 1 _.._ •• i nb' ~se3 in ~ Q j j s ~ ~ j ny epuenn!;3 ® ny epuer~n!33 V I C as 38 ~ ~ ,- J j ny ~a;sayooa ny ~a;sayoob r"- ny ua~!II!W i .._.._.._..- i ny ua~!II!W i i i ny uaneH • ny uaneH i i ny esow~aH j i ny esow~aH nH Ple4!4o~`d ; nd PIe9!4o~H ~ - n uew a ny uewllaH i ~~ ~ y ll H i J L . 1 ny p~eRau ln 3S ue!lawe~ i ge=g°g6;g_a~ i ~. • in ~ ~ ny anal in te~~ae_`4j=°r ~ .., ~_ .. m _ ~.~~ g~,z ~ m c $nj ~ r4F S€~ F p 6@e ' i°€ 6 `-~ m e~ F f~°3~e~, pe~~ °~ = o y E¢gea Pp Yi EB e~'0E? ~2a§paa&p ~~ 8t8eg:P e~1$t P344 StaffReport DATE: June 03, 2009 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: John R. Gillison, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Servic~s BY: Ingrid Y. Bruce, GIS/Special Districts Manager '~~J~ SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION TO APPROVE THE RESOLUTIONS TO ACCEPT THE PRELINHNARY ENGINEER'S REPORTS AND ANNOUNCING THE CITY COUNCIL'S IlVTENTION TO COLLECT ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS WI'T'HIN PARK AND RECREATION IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. PD-85 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2009/10. NO INCREASE OF ASSESSMENT RATE IS PROPOSED RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council approve the Resolutions accepting the Engineer's Report and setting the Public Hearing for June 17, 2009 to levy the annual assessments for Park and Recreation Improvement District No. PD-85. There is no increase to the current rates for fiscal year 2009/2010. The Engineer's Report is on file in the City Clerk's Office. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS PD-85 was originally created to provide funds to finance the cost of construction, maintenance, operation and debt payment of Heritage Community Park and Red Hill Community Park. Heritage Community Park is a 40-acre facility located on the southwest comer of Hillside Road and Beryl Street. Red Hil] Community Park is 42 acres and is located on the southwest corner of Base Line Road and Vineyard Avenue. The District's boundary includes all of the City of Rancho Cucamonga with the general exception of land east of the Deer Creek Channel and the Victoria, Caryn and Terra Vista Planned Communities. The final debt service payment of the Bonds that were sold to finance the construction of Red Hill and Heritage Community Parks were repaid on September O1, 2005. Subsequently with the debt repaid the annual assessments were decreased for all the property owners and the annual assessments levied and collected are dedicated to the ongoing maintenance and operation, with CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT PARK AND RECREATION IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. PD-85 June 03, 2009 Page 2 periodic capital improvement expenditures, of the parks. Therefore, pursuant to the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972, each yeaz the City Council must adopt resolutions giving approval of the Engineer's Report and declaring its intention to levy and collect assessments for the upcoming fiscal year. It is recommended that the assessment rates in PD-85 remain at existing levels for Fiscal Year 2009/2010. Assessments for PD-85 will be levied according to the following schedule: Definition Single Family Residential Multi-Family Residential Less than 1.50 acres 1.51 acres to 3.50 acres 3.51 acres to 7.00 acres 7.01 acres to 14.00 acres 14.01 acres to 25.00 acres 25.01 acres and larger Assessment per Parcel $31.00 $31.00 $15.50 $46.50 $108.50 $217.00 $434.00 $775.00 P345 Attachments: Resolutions Engineer's Report P346 RESOLUTION NO. D 9- ~ 7 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, FOR APPROVAL OF THE CITY ENGINEER'S ANNUAL REPORT FOR PARK AND RECREATION IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT (PD-85) FOR FISCAL YEAR 2009/10. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby resolve that: WHEREAS, pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, the City Engineer is required to make and file with the City Clerk of said City an annual report in writing for which assessments are to be levied and collected to pay the costs of the maintenanceand/or improvement of said Park and Recreation Improvement District (PD-85); and WHEREAS, the City Engineer has made and filed with the City Clerk of said City a report in writing as called for pursuant to said Act, which report has been presented to this Council for consideration; and. WHEREAS, said City Council has duly considered said report and each and every part thereof, and finds that each and every part of said report is sufficient, and that said report, nor any part thereof, should not be modified in any respect. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby order as follows: That the Engineer's Estimate of the itemized costs and expenses of said work and ofthe incidental expenses in connection therewith, contained in said report be, and it is hereby, preliminarily approved and confirmed. 2. That the diagram showing the Assessment District referred to and described in said report, the boundaries of the subdivisions of land within said Assessment District are hereby preliminaiily approved and confirmed. 3. That the proposed assessment upon the subdivisions of land in said Assessment District in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by said subdivision, respectively, from said work and of the incidental expenses thereof, as contained in said report is hereby approved and confirmed. 4. That said report shall stand as the City Engineer's Annual Report for the fiscal year 2009/2010 for the subsequent proceedings. P347 RESOLUTION NO. ©9- ®~ 7 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN PARK AND RECREATION IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT (PD-85) FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2009/10 PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972; AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, does resolve as follows: Description of Work SECTION 1: That the public interest and convenience require and it is the intention of this City Council to levy and collect assessments within Park and Recreation Improvement District (PD-85) for the fiscal year 2009/2010 for the maintenance and operation of Red Hill Community Park and Heritage Community Park thereon dedicated for common purposes by deed or recorded subdivision tract map within the boundaries of said district. Said maintenance and operation includes the cost and supervision of landscape maintenance (including repair removal or replacement of all or any part ofany improvement) in connection with said district. Location of Work SECTION 2: The foregoing described work is to be located within the Red Hill Community Park and Heritage Community Park enumerated in the report of the City Engineer and described on maps that are on file in the City Clerk's office, entitled "Assessment Diagram Park and Recreation Improvement District (PD-85)." Description of Assessment District SECTION 3: That the contemplated work, in the opinion ofthe City Council, is of more than local or ordinary public benefit, and the City Council hereby makes the expense ofthe work chargeable upon the district, which said district is assessed to pay the costs and expenses thereof, and which district is described as follows: All that certain territory of the City of Rancho Cucamonga included within the exterior boundary lines shown upon that certain "Map of Park and Recreation Improvement District (PD-85)", indicating by said boundary lines the extent of the territory included within said assessment district and which maps are on file in the office of the City Clerk of said City. Reference is hereby made to said map for further, full and more particular description of said assessment district, and the map so on file shall govern for all details as to the extent of the assessment district. P348 Report of Engineer SECTION 4: The City Council by Resolution No. approved the Report of the City Engineer, which Report indicates the amount of the proposed assessments, the District boundary, assessment zones, and the method of assessment. The Report titled "Annual Engineer's Report" is on file in the office of the City Clerk of said City. Reference to said report is hereby made for all particulazs for the amount and extent of the assessments and for the extent of the work. Time and Place of Hearing SECTION 5: Notice is hereby given that a Public Hearing is hereby scheduled in the Civic Center Council Chambers, 10500 Civic Center Drive, City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, 91730. WEDNESDAY, June 17, 2009, AT 7:00 P.M. Any and all persons may appeaz and show cause why said maintenance and service for the existing improvements and the proposed improvements should not be done or carried out or why assessments should not be levied and collected for fiscal year 2009/2010. Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 SECTION 6: All the work herein proposed shall be done and carried through in pursuance of an act of the legislature of the State of California designated as the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California. Publication of Resolution of Intention SECTION 7: Published notice shall be made pursuant to Section 6061 of the Government Code. The Mayor shall sign this Resolution and the City Clerk shall attest to the same, and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published 10 days before the date set for the heazing, at least once in the Inland Valle~y Bulletin, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. P349 PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of June 2009. Donald J. Kurth, M.D., Mayor ATTEST: Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk I, JANICE C. REYNOLDS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the day of June 2009. Executed this day of June 2009, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk P350 Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2009/2010 City of Rancho Cucamonga PARKS AND RECREATION IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. PD-85 Approved: No. Co59672 EKp. 6,90 1 1 P351 TABLE OF CONTENTS Authority for Report ..................................................................... 3 Findings ..................................................................... 3 District Analysis ..................................................................... 4 Estimate of Work ..................................................................... 4 Method of Spread ........................................................................ 6 Calendar Year Annexations ................................................ 8 Boundary Map ...................................................................9 z P352 City of Rancho Cucamonga Annual Report PD-85 fiscal Year 2009/2010 AUTHORITY FOR REPORT This report for the 2009/2010 fiscal year is prepared pursuant to the order of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972, being Division 15, Section 22500 of the Streets and Highways code. Provisions for this annual assessment are included in Chapter 3 of the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972. The purpose of this report is to set forth findings and the assessment analysis for the annual levy of assessments for the Park and Recreation Improvement District No. PD-85 thereafter referred to as "the District". This District, using direct benefit assessments, was originally created to provide funds to finance the cost of construction, maintenance, operation and debt payment of Heritage Community Park and Red Hill Community Park in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Subsequently the debt has been repaid with only the ongoing maintenance and operation with periodic capital improvement expenditures of the parks remaining. FINDINGS Section 22573, Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972, requires assessments to be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. The section states: "The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefts to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements." The means of determining whether or not a parcel will benefit from the improvements is contained in the Improvement Act of 1911 (Division 7, commencing with Section 5000 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California). The 1972 Act also provides for the classification of various areas within an assessment district into benefit areas where, by reason of variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive differing degrees of all territory receiving substantially the same degree of benefit from the improvements and may consist of contiguous or noncontiguous areas. As the assessments are levied on the basis of benefit, they are considered a user's fee, not a tax; and, therefore, are not governed by Article XIIIA. Properties owned by public agencies, such as a city, county, state, or the federal government are not assessable without the approval of the particular agency and, normally, are not assessed. Certain other parcels used for railroad mainline right-of-way, public utility transmission right-of-way, and common areas are also exempt from assessment. The assessment for mobile home parks will be based upon underlying lot acreage P353 DISTRICT ANALYSIS A. District Boundary The district includes all of the Ciry of Rancho Cucamonga with the general exception of land east of Deer Creek Channel and the Victoria, Caryn & Terra Vista Planned Communities. All parcels of real property affected are more particularly described in maps prepared in accordance with Section 327 of the Revenue and Taxation Code, which are on file in the office of the San Bernardino County Assessor in the Hall of Records, 172 West Third Street, San Bernardino, California and which are hereby made a part hereof by reference. B. District Name City of Rancho Cucamonga Park and Recreation Improvement District No. PD - 85. C. Facilities The existing works within the District boundary are generally described as follows: 1. The maintenance and operation of Heritage Community Park including, but not limited to, grading, planting, irrigation, onsite roads, sidewalks, parking lots, lighting, restrooms, equestrian facilities, playground equipment, picnic facilities, athletic facilities, and walking, jogging and equestrian trails and sanitary sewer connections. 2. The maintenance and operation of Red Hill Community Park including, but not limited to, grading, planting, irrigation, onsite roads, sidewalks, parking lots, lighting, waterscape, restrooms, senior citizen facilities, playground equipment, picnic facilities, major lighted athletic facilities, jogging trail, sanitary sewer connections and onsite drainage inlets. D. The assessment rate for the 2009/2010 FY is $31.00. No increase to this assessment rate is proposed. It is estimated that this assessment rate will cover the district's maintenance and operation expenses for the 2009/2010 FY. ESTIMATE OF WORK The Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 permits carrying forward surpluses or recovering deficits in subsequent fiscal years. Costs for the district will be reviewed annually. Any surplus credited against assessment or any deficits shall be included in the assessment for the following fiscal year. P354 Proposed Maintenance Budget: FY 2009/2010 PROJECTED REVENUE $1,662,860.00 Personnel Services Regular Salaries $614,330.00 Overtime Salaries 3,680.00 Part Time Salaries 26,160.00 Fringe Benefts 291,260.00 Subtotal $935,790.00 Ooerations 8 Maintenance Operations & Maintenance $ 95,250.00 Operations & Maintenance -Facilities 12,500.00 Vehicle Operations & Maintenance 1,000.00 Emergency Equipment & Veh. Rntl 3,000.00 Equip Operations & Maint. 10,000.00 Contract Services 45,800.00 Contract Services/Facilities 10,000.00 Tree Maintenance 18,200.00 Telephone Utilities 5,950.00 Water Utilities 213,530.00 Electric Utilities 142,780.00 Assessment Administration 152,490.00 Admin./General Overhead 85,170.00 Subtotal $792,670.00 Capital Outlay Capital Outlay -Equipment 0.00 Capital Project 250,000.00 Subtotal $250,000.00 Total PD-85 Expenditure Budget $1,978,460.00 Expenditure of Reserves 315,600.00 Projected Revenue 1,662,860.00 P355 METHOD OF SPREAD The Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 indicates that assessments may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes costs among all lots or parcels within the District in proportion to the estimated benefit received. A. Definitions The District is divided into three categories for the purpose of determining the assessments as follows: CATEGORY A -includes parcels based on the number of existing residential units within certain ranges of parcel size. CATEGORY B -includes all parcels not defined in Category A or Category C. CATEGORY C -includes exempt parcels. Exempt parcels were discovered by searching the County Assessor's computer tapes for those parcels that are listed as exempt by the Assessor or which have an assessed value of less than $500. In conducting the search, several parcels were included as exempt that show parcel sizes in excess of 1.5 acres and type codes of, for example, residential or agriculture. These parcels were added back into the rolls and assessed. Formula The assessment formula is based on actual land use information contained in the current San Bernardino Assessor's computer files and Assessor's parcel maps. Category A: All parcels containing existing residential dwelling units and meeting the following conditions. Parcel Size/Range Less than 1.5 Acres and 1.51 to 35. Acres and 3.51 to 7.0 Acres and 7.01 to 14.0 dwelling units 14.01 to 25.0 Acres and 25.01 acres and larger Dwelling Units/Parcel 1 or more dwelling units 2 or more dwelling units 4 or more dwelling units 8 or dwelling units 15 or more dwelling units 26 or more dwelling units Category A is based on the number of existing residential units. The actual assessment for Bond Debt Service per existing residential dwelling unit may decrease each year as more residential units are built within the improvement district. Maintenance costs, however, are expected to increase annually and will somewhat offset the anticipated decrease in assessments due to new development. Category B: All parcels not defined in Category A or Category C. 6 P356 Category C: All exempt parcels as defined below: 1. All properties currently tax exempt; 2. All public ownership; 3. Railroad mainline rights-of-way 4. Major utility transmission rights-of-way; 5. Mineral rights; 6. Parcels so small they currently cannot be built upon; 7. All normally assessable parcels within an assessed valuation of less than $500 and 1.5 acres or less; and, C. Summary of Preliminary Assessment Amounts Category A: The preliminary estimated assessment rate, which will be levied during fiscal year 2009/2010, is $31.00 per dwelling unit for those parcels in Category A. Category A parcels containing more than one residential dwelling unit will be assessed for an amount equal to $31.00 times the number of dwelling units. Category B: The assessment, which may be levied for parcels within Category B during fiscal year 2009/2010, shall be according to the following schedule: Definition Single-Family Residential Multi-Family Residential Less than 1.5 Acres 1.51 Acres to 3.50 Acres 3.51 Acres to 7.0 Acres 7.01 Acres to 14.0 Acres 14.01 Acres to 25.0 Acres 25.01 Acres and larger Category C: Assessment Per Parcel $31.00 $31.00 $15.50 $46.50 $108.50 $217.00 $434.00 $775.00 The assessment shall be $0.00 for Category C parcels. P357 Calendar Year 2008 Annexations Parks and Recreation District - PD-85 PROJECT Tract 17818 DRC 2007-00491 DRC2005-01060 Parcel Map 17808 DRC2005-00831 DRC2008-00357 DRC2006-00633 DRC2006-00866 Tract 18994 UNITS ANNEX. DATE 6.97 Acres 1/16/2008 1 Single family dwellings 5/07/2008 40 multi-family dwellings 5/07/2008 2 single family dwellings 6/18/2008 1.09 Acres 8/20/2008 0.19 Acres 10/15/2008 166 multi-family dwellings 11/19/2008 30.41 Acres 11/19/2008 5.47 Acres 1 210 3/2 0 08 P358 ~ ~ ~ d ~ ~1= 4 ~ ~ M J T W Q ~ Q ~ o ~ ~ ~, ~' J i r o ~~Iv////~~~ ~ ~ ~` 7~..~..~.. ~ O ~ -0 ~ QN V' ~d ~ ~ ~ i _ J m ~ ^, W i N ~ ~ 3 m ~ o ~i ~ i nb iSe3 in ~ ~ ! ~r ~ i ny epuenn!~~ ny epuenn!~~ Q I ~8 ~aaa~ ea ny aa~sayoo~ ny ~a~say~o~ ~~.. i ny ua~{!II!W nb ua~l!II!W ny uaneH ny uaneH ny esow~aH ny esowaaH ny pleq!y~~b nb Pleq!yo~b ~ ny uewllaH ny uewllaH ~ r ~ ny p e~(au!n _ ~A.~a~~ 9'.'s_e`aA`Cq Q_ ~S ueilawe~ F~~~~,;~~P°~ a~_c`Sp~€Y `__ ga~~~W'q ~ Lam, o - oN`"E4O5~9w~ `e / LL dg~Epeu~ ~ O' 0p ~~~a>€a (~ ~ O ~ Q9°Bgz~3u~q~ ~ ~ D7 LL Q g ~ ~ p€:g ~^E~,:a ~~~ : B~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Y es ~a gsU ~~~~$F~ d~ t ~ Z o q - O = ~~y ~a2a~o s_-a~ Src~B E ~ ~ ~ ~' e o go `o D~~rv g`6Eli Eau ` `v _ . _, J t~kpig~~~~~~2 P359 STAFF REPORT P L A N N I N G D E P A R T M E N T Date: June 3, 2009 To: Mayor and Members of the City Council From: James R. Troyer, AICP, Planning Director By: Mike Smith, Associate Planner RANCHO ~UCAMONGA Subject: PUBLIC CONVENIENCE OR NECESSITY DRC2009-00334 - 7-ELEVEN, INC. - A request for a Public Convenience or Necessity determination for a Type 20 Off-Sale Beer and Wine License for a proposed market to be located in an existing commercial center at the northwest corner of Milliken Avenue and 4th Street in the Mixed Use Residential (MUR) District, Subarea 18, located at 9638 Milliken Avenue - APN: 0210-581-04. Staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from CEQA review and qualifies as a Class 1 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15301. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council approve the determination of a Public Convenience or Necessity fora 7-Eleven Market, located at 9638 Milliken Avenue, through the adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval. A copy of the Resolution of Approval will be will forwarded to the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC). ANALYSIS: A. Background: A 7-Eleven Market is proposed to be located in a building of about 2,800 square feet (Building E) at the northeast corner of an existing commercial center of about 4.15 acres. This commercial center is located at the northwest corner of 4th Street and Milliken Avenue (Exhibits A and B). The applicant is currently in the process of preparing interior improvement plans for this building for review by the City. The market will provide a variety of goods, including medicines, food products (fresh and pre-packaged), beauty products, dairy, and other associated convenience items. Per discussion with the applicant, there will not be any floor sales of alcohol. All alcohol will be in cabinet coolers. The business does not sell videos or have any coin-operated amusement devices. There will be 1 to 2 employees in the market, with a total of about 2-5 employees overall. The market will operate 24 hours a day, everyday; alcohol sales will hot be permitted between 2:00 a.m. to 6:00 a.m. B. Requirements from the Department of Alcohol Beverage Control (ABC): According to the ABC staff, there are 32 off-sale licenses within this Census Tract (0021). The limit within this Census Tract is 17; accordingly, the Census Tract is over-concentrated by 15 licenses, which necessitates a finding of Public Convenience or Necessity for any additional licenses. P360 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT DRC2009-00265 - 7-ELEVEN MARKET June 3, 2009 Page 2 The Department of Alcohol Beverage Control (ABC) regulates the distribution of liquor licenses by setting limits on the various types of licenses in each census tract. The limits are calculated based on the ratio of liquor licenses to the population within a given Census Tract and is regulated by Section 23958 of the California Business and Professional Code. In cases where a Census Tract exceeds the limit, a finding of Public Convenience or Necessity (PCN) is required by the local agency, which in the City of Rancho Cucamonga is the City Council. The legislation purposely left the term Public Convenience or Necessity undefined so that the local legislative body, in this case the City Council, would have the greatest latitude for discretion based on the local conditions and circumstances. C. Facts to Support a Public Convenience or Necessity Determination: The following are facts to support the requested Public Convenience or Necessity. Fact: A convenience store selling beer and wine for off-site consumption is a common and accepted business practice. Fact: The site is located in an existing commercial center on the northwest corner of 4th Street and Milliken Avenue. Both streets are classified as major thoroughfares, and the site iswell-suited for this type of business. Fact: The Census Tract in which the site is located (0021), also includes the Ontario Mills shopping center in the City of Ontario, which has a large number of restaurants with alcohol licenses. Because of the large geographic boundaries of Census Tract 0021 and the concentration of commercial businesses, Census Tract 0021 is over concentrated. The Ontario Mills shopping center is physically separated from the majority of residential neighborhoods in Rancho Cucamonga by an industrial district, greatly diminishing potential negative effects that an additional alcohol license will have on the City's residential neighborhoods. Fact: The site is not close to sensitive users, such as day care facilities, schools, and/or churches. Fact: Rancho Cucamonga residents would be afforded more convenient shopping opportunities with the addition of beer and wine to the proposed store's selection of medicines, food (fresh and pre-packaged) products, beauty products, dairy, and other associated convenience items. D. Environmental Assessment: The Planning Department staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines. The project qualifies as a Class 1 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15301, which covers the permitting of existing structures that involve negligible or no expansion of use beyond that existing at the time of the lead agency's original determination. The project consists of issuing a Public Convenience or Necessity determination for a proposed business with no modification to the interior or the exterior of the building. Staff finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment in that P361 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT DRC2009-00265 - 7-ELEVEN MARKET June 3, 2009 Page 3 the building was intended to be used by a commercial tenant. The City Council has reviewed the Planning Department's determination of exemption, and based on its own independent judgment, concurs in the staffs determination of exemption. CONCLUSION: Based on the above analysis, staff finds that a determination of a Public Convenience or Necessity in order to obtain the issuance of a Type 20 ABC Off-Sale Beer and Wine license for the 7-Eleven Market, located at 9638 Milliken Avenue, will not have a negative impact to the surrounding uses. Respectfully submitted, ~. Jams .Troyer, AICP Plann ng Director JRT:MS/ge Attachments: Exhibit A -Location Map Exhibit B -Aerial Photo Exhibit C -Site Plan Exhibit D -Floor Plan Exhibit E -Census Map Exhibit F -Applicant Letter Requesting Public Convenience and Necessity Resolution of Approval for Public Convenience and Necessity DRC2009-00334 ~~ xm ho ~..E~ eslv~~ a _.i 9 Iasi oaexses? ~ _-1[mannvf' - ~~ l -~ ~ n~~ ~ !RO ~ 8 BJI +~' ~~~ Y ~ II i S i ~ RANCHO C[JCAMONGA xr '; CENTRAL PARK ~ ~ . ~U~ ,.. ~ q.' WflA'! Y~ .__ca[t1.wA~ MIL[.IKEN ~~~ ~ PARK ~ PARK 6i ~~\G / \ J ~~I COYOTE ~ EiYTfq „~^~`\~n^ \ CANYON I ~ Y.MC.A. W \\ K \\ \, RALPH M.\~~ ~J A:R TERRA VISTA ~ I t€wLS rnrsx _ RANCHO TOWN CENTER \_-~~- csaNaNT fORIC MEDICAL CENTER COURT I 1 OUSE v~~ ~~~SS~1~ I `6~ 1\ :A L. POLICE ).~~~~ ~m nxNeT_6\ MLLIELUMQ ??~~~~ ~ STATIO 1I HOSPITAL ~~ _.. EXHIBIT -EIIfN1NE - L IAeS it cocr ~ d course G' I + ~~ Im I __ ~I s. J! A i~ I Fire Staflon 3 4VlN0.LLLFMEA XP S.3Y VICTORIA GARDENS ` NOPiN W1XSf y ° 6WIX IMIX51~ a 5 ~ s ~ ~ urN'wucs ate 2 -~PAi~ cnosMlu swc -EPICENTER RANCHO PoOiIIILL MPPNETV4LE YplXXAI ~ ~' PROJECT SITE ;- ~ _~` . of _~i6TN 3Ti m'11/', ry~i~ll ~i li d > c - 6iHffi 7;~. I ~_srx XeXiwo~~ ^,! Ili Public Convenience or Necessity P363 EXHit~i u DRC2009-00334 Public Convenience or Necessity P364 DRC2009-00334 x~ >F'1 ', , , Jf - EXHIBIT C FOURTH STREET 3 ~~~, ~[ li i Q {~ tt i~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~ °0000 .,~ o_.. ~~ ,~~ ~ ~ ~~• d P t ®~ gg ~ ~ ~ ' ~ ©5' ®@' ~. ,A ~~ ~ O i 1~ ~ ~ ; 4 Em ..d...~,...v,~....~..._~_..~ EXHIBIT D P365 ~ P366 c d aQ ~ c ~ Y = ~z c _ c >~ _ J ~ ~ W ~ ~ ~ ~~ 3 m ~ ° \ o Q t ... co --~ - ~ ; _,~~~ ~~~; ',~~ pae~au!n '~.' '.^^^~---oo anoa~ o = .c °0 s o o a.. 00 00 r ~ '~ ~ epuenn!~3 ua~!II!W ~uaneH ' I iesowaaH pleq!y~~br uewllaH EXHIBIT E CITY OF RANCHO CUCANiCp36~ MAY 1 4 2009 E~~® City of Rancho Cucamonga Request for PCN Findings RECEII~ED -PLANNING 9638 Milliken Ave., Rancho Cucamonga, CA 92821 Southland Co Mazkets was founded in 1927 in Dallas Texas. In 1946 it became known as 7-Eleven and 1999 it became 7-Eleven Inc. A franchise was introduced to support operators looking to build a business with a convenience store brand. 7 -Eleven now has more than 35,000 stores in 17 countries. 7- Eleven is one of the nations leading convenience stores chains and known worldwide for quality products and great customer service. Our business is unique to this area with 7-Eleven's new image. (see attached photos) The surrounding businesses and community will benefit from the public convenience of an upscale Market. The applicant is requesting PCN findings for a type 20 Beer and wine license for off-sale consumption at this location. This is a common and accepted practice at most like type businesses. The proposed use will provide a variety of goods that cater to a variety of needs of consumers. With a selection of other goods such as medicines, fresh foods, hot foods, pre-packaged food items, beauty products, dairy products, meats, breads, coffee station, banishes and a pleasant atmosphere to relax in. Residents and employees within the immediate area can benefit from an offering of this kind, since there is no other similar use to ours in the immediate area. 7-Eleven Market is located on a commercially zoned and developed section of Milliken Ave and Fourth Street. The surrounding area has compatible and similar uses that of the proposed use. The subject property is classified as commercial as is approximately 2,800 square feet total use and selling floor aprox 1,700. The property is located and designed to encourage business and job growth within the city. We offer a variety of items for our customers to choose from. Parking will be provided on site, not to create traffic flow problems. The requested use at the proposed location will not adversely affect the economic welfare of the nearby community. This request will only benefit the community. We offer an up- scale 7- Eleven with a new image to our community. We employ approximately 2 - 5 people at each our locations. Hours of operation will be 24 hours with limited hours on alcohol~sa.limited to Gam - 2 am 7 days a week. This location will not be materially detrimental to the use, enjoyment of property of others persons located in the vicinity of the site. Residential zoned and developed properties are buffered from site and sound of other surrounding businesses, streets and alleys. This proposed change will have very minimal noise impact beyond what normally occurs for this type of use. EX H I B I T F Southwest Division 330 E. Lambert Road, Suite 150 / Brea, California 92821 714-529-7711 P368 The approval of the PCN (Public Convenience or Necessity) will not jeopazdize, endanger or otherwise constitute a menace to the public health, safety or general welfare. Since this business is unique in the immediate area. Traffic will not be an issue at this subject property. We have security cameras that monitor the front and reaz of the premises at all times. This will only enhance the thriving area of this community. This subject property will bring jobs within the community to create economic growth in this azea. MAR-17-2009 15:36 ABC RIVERSIDE DISTRICT 951 781 0531 P.002 03/17/2009 02:37 19ll7Qb /ltltlr ~ -••~•- - - March 1.7, 2009 Dcpartment of Alcoholic Beverage Control Riverside Office Room#900 3737 Main Street ' Riverside, CA 92501: Re: ABC 23958.E B & ]P ~appDcation work Sheet Stets Dear Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control: I woald like to request ABC Off-Sale Census TractlCindue Concentration. and Crinee state for the following locatiom: 1. 9632 Milliken ' Rancho Cucamomg~a, CA Census # 21 Please faa report to Thank You. Cell#909-519-1899 Sherrie Olson at 909-467-1867 17-flue 3a = Acx~~ ~ ~~t2. CANG,.N~'~~ fly ~. pD N OT ~ G+~c M~ 5•T~•TS . r• MAR-17-2009 14:26 X19094671867 97i ?•001 TOTnL ?.OC2 P369 P370 RESOLUTION NO. 09-. D9S A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A DETERMINATION OF PUBLIC CONVENIENCE OR NECESSITY FOR A TYPE 20 OFF-SALE BEER AND WINE LICENSE FORA PROPOSED MARKETTO BE LOCATED IN AN EXISTING COMMERCIAL CENTER AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF MILLIKEN AVENUE AND 4TH STREET IN THE MIXED USE RESIDENTIAL (MUR) DISTRICT, SUBAREA 18, LOCATED AT 9638 MILLIKEN AVENUE; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF -APN: 0210-581-04. A. Recitals 1. A 7-Eleven Market filed an application fora Public Convenience or Necessity determination DRC2009-00334, as described in the title of this Resolution, for a Type 20 Off-Sale Beer and Wine License from the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC). 2. Section 23958 of the California Business and Professional Code requires the City of Rancho Cucamonga to make a determination that the issuance of the said license will service the Public Convenience or Necessity. 3. On the 3rd day of June 2009, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga reviewed said application prior to the adoption of this Resolution. 4. All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-referenced meeting on June 3, 2009, including written and oral staff reports, this Council hereby specifcally finds as follows: a. A convenience store selling beer and wine for off-site consumption is a common and accepted business practice; and b. The site is located in an existing commercial center on the northwest corner of 4th Street and Milliken Avenue; both streets are classified as major thoroughfares. The site is well-suited for this type of business; and c. The Census Tract in which the site is located (0021) also includes the Ontario Mills shopping center in the City of Ontario, which has a large number of restaurants with alcohol licenses. Because of the large geographic boundaries of Census Tract 0021 and the concentration of commercial businesses, Census Tract 0021 is over concentrated. The Ontario Mills shopping center is physically separated from the majority of the residential neighborhoods in Rancho Cucamonga by an Industrial District, greatly diminishing potential negative effects that an additional alcohol license will have on the City's residential neighborhoods; and P371 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. xx-xx DRC2009-00334 - 7-ELEVEN MARKET June 3, 2009 Page 2 d. The site is not close to sensitive users, such as day care facilities, schools, and/or churches; and e. Rancho Cucamonga residents would be afforded more convenient shopping opportunities with the addition of beer and wine to the proposed store's selection of medicines, food (fresh and pre-packaged) products, beauty products, dairy, and other associated convenience items. 3. Environmental Assessment: The Planning Department staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines. The project qualifies as a Class 1 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15301, which covers the permitting of existing structures that involve negligible or no expansion of use beyond that existing at the time of the lead agency's original determination. The project consists of issuing a Public Convenience or Necessity determination for an existing business with no modification to the interior or the exterior of the building. Staff f nds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment in that the building was intended to be used by a commercial tenant. The City Council has reviewed the Planning Department's determination of exemption, and based on its own independent judgment, concurs in the staffs determination of exemption. 4. Based upon the findings set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2 and 3 above, and with the condition specified in Section 6, this City Council concludes that the issuance of an off-sale beer and wine license for the 7-Eleven Market will not have a negative impact to the surrounding uses. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3 and 4 above, this City Council hereby determines that with the imposition of the condition specified in Section 6, the issuance of an off-sale beer and wine license for the 7-Eleven Market, located at 9638 Milliken Avenue will service the Public Convenience or Necessity. 6. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 above, this City Council hereby approves the request for a Public Convenience or Necessity determination subject to each and every condition set forth below. Planning Department The area devoted to the display and sale of alcoholic beverages shall be limited to a maximum 10 percent of the gross floor area of the building. 2. Floor sales of beer and/or wine is prohibited. 3. Any violations of the above-noted conditions shall result in a Code Enforcement action, including, but not limited to, the revocation of the store's business license. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this Resolution. P372 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT .~~ - DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: DRC2009-00334 SUBJECT: PUBLIC CONVENIENCE OR NECESSITY APPLICANT: 7-ELEVE LOCATION: 9638 MILLIKEN AVENUE - APN: 0210-581 ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: A. General Requirements The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 2. The applicant shall be required to pay any applicable Fish and Game fees as shown below. The project planner will confirm which fees apply to this project. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to the Planning Commission or Planning Director hearing: a) Notice of Exemption - $50 X 3. Copies of the signed City Council Resolution of Approval, Standard Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. SC-12-08 Completion Date / / / / / / I:\PLANNING\FINAL\CITYCNCL\2009 stf, res, ord\DRC2009-00334StdCond 6-3.doc Project No.-P373 Completion Date B. Site Development Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the time of building permit issuance. 2 I'\PLANNING\FINAL\CITYCNCL\2009 stf, res, ord\DRC2009-00334StdCond 6-3.doc P374 STAFF REPORT P L A N N I N G D E P A R T M E N T Date: June 3, 2009 To: Mayor and Members of the City Council From: James R. Troyer, AICP, Planning Director By: Tabe van der Zwaag, Associate Planner i RANCHO CUCAMONGA Subject: PUBLIC CONVENIENCE OR NECESSITY DRC2009-00391 -Total Wine & More - A request for a Public Convenience or Necessity determination for a beer, wine and distilled spirits retailer which is seeking approval of both a Type 21 Off-Sale General and a Type 42 On-Sale Beer and Wine for Public Premises alcohol license for a site located within the Foothill Crossing commercial center on the east side of Day Creek Boulevard and south of Foothill Boulevard at 8201 Day Creek Boulevard in the Regionally Related Office/Commercial District (RRO/C) - APN: 0229-021-78. Staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from CEQA review and qualifies as a Class 1 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15301. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council approve the determination of a Public Convenience or Necessity for Total Wine & More, located at 8201 Day Creek Boulevard, through the adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval. A copy of the Resolution of Approval will be forwarded to the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC). ENTITLEMENT HISTORY: The Planning Director approved Conditional Use Permit DRC2009-00139 on April 7, 2009, entitling Total Wine & More to operate a 25,000 square foot alcohol beverage retail business at 8201 Day Creek Boulevard. ANALYSIS: A. Background: Total Wine & More is in the process of opening in the Foothill Crossing commercial center in an existing 25,000 square foot building, located on the east side of Day Creek Boulevard, south of Foothill Boulevard. The tenants in the existing 315,000 square foot center include Sears Grand, restaurants (including Buffalo Wild Wings, Red Robin and Joe's Crab Shack), as well as a variety of retail shops and service businesses. Total Wine & More hours of operation will be Monday through Thursday from 9:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m., Friday and Saturday from 9:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m., and Sunday from noon to 8:00 p.m. Total Wine & More is a retail wine, beer, and distilled spirits business that also offers periodic wine education seminars and wine tastings (class size limited to 30 customers). The business requires two types of Alcoholic Beverage (ABC) Licenses. A Type 21 License is required for the retail area, and will permit the sale of beer, wine, and distilled P375 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT DRC2009-00391 -TOTAL WINE & MORE June 3, 2009 Page 2 distilled spirits for consumption off the premises. Minors are permitted in the general retail sales area. A Type 42 License is required for the wine tasting area, which will offer for sale wine samples. A Type 42 License permits the sale of beer and wine for consumption on the premises. The wine tasting area will have an overall area of approximately 210 square feet (14 feet by 15 feet), with a small bar area of approximately 8 feet by 8 feet. Per ABC Rule 107, signage will be posted stating "No Persons Under 21 Allowed." Staff finds the classroom and wine tasting area to be a logical extension of the Total Wine & More business practice and should not create any nuisance impacts. B. Requirements from the Department of Alcohol Beverage Control (ABC): The Department of Alcohol Beverage Control has informed staff that the total number of existing off-sale general (Type 21) and on-sale beer and wine (Type 42) licenses within this Census Tract (0022.03) total 10 and 12, respectively. The limit within this Census Tract is 4 for both license types; accordingly, the Census Tract is over-concentrated by 6 off-sale general and 8 on-sale beer and wine licenses, which necessitates a finding of Public Convenience or Necessity for any additional licenses. The Department of Alcohol Beverage Control (ABC) regulates the distribution of liquor licenses by setting limits on the various types of licenses in each census tract. The limits are calculated based on the ratio of liquor licenses to the population within a given Census Tract and is regulated by Section 23958 of the California Business and Professional Code. In cases where a Census Tract exceeds the limit, a finding of Public Convenience or Necessity (PCN) is required by the local agency, which in the City of Rancho Cucamonga is the City Council. The legislation purposely left the term Public Convenience or Necessity undefined so that the local legislative body would have the greatest latitude for discretion based on the local conditions and circumstances. C. Facts to Support a Public Convenience or Necessity Determination: The following are facts to support the requested Public Convenience or Necessity. Fact: Total Wine & More is a large alcoholic beverage retailer whose business model is predicated on serving a regional customer base. The site is located within the Regionally Related Office/Commercial District, which was designed to accommodate this type of retail business Fact: The site is bordered by Interstate 15 to the east and commercial development to the north, south and west and is not within 1,000 feet of existing or planned residential development. Fact: The site is located within Census Tract 0022.03, which encompasses the southeast portion of the City and is mostly zoned for industrial development. The Census Tract also has a number of large commercial developments along Foothill Boulevard and a small residential population. Because of the low residential population, only a small number of alcohol licenses are permitted in the Census Tract before it becomes over-concentrated by ABC. It should be noted that the Census Tract to the north (0020.07) has a large residential population with a small number of commercial and industrial developments, P376 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT DRC2009-00391 -TOTAL WINE & MORE June 3,2009 Page 3 helping to balance out the two neighboring Census Tracts and limiting any negative effects on the neighboring residential areas. Fact: The site is not close to sensitive users, such as day care facilities, schools, and/or churches. Fact: Rancho Cucamonga residents would be afforded more convenient shopping opportunities with the applicant's large selection of beer, wine, and distilled spirits and the ability to sample and learn about the products they are purchasing. D. Environmental Assessment: The Planning Department staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines. The project qualifies as a Class 1 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15301, which covers the permitting of existing structures that involve negligible or no expansion of use beyond that existing at the time of the lead agency's original determination. The project consists of issuing a Public Convenience or Necessity determination for a business opening in an existing commercial building. Staff finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment in that the building was intended to be used for the proposed use. The City Council has reviewed the Planning Department's determination of exemption, and based on its own independent judgment, concurs in the staff's determination of exemption. CONCLUSION: Based on the above analysis, staff finds that a determination of a Public Convenience or Necessity, in order to obtain the issuance of a Type 21 and Type 42 alcohol licenses for Total Wine & More, located at 8201 Day Creek Boulevard, will not have a negative impact to the surrounding uses. Respectfully submitted, ^~,,~ 2. ~V~' "' _I _ `" Jam R. Troyer, AICP Planning Director JT:TV~ds Attachments: Exhibit A -Project Site Plan Exhibit B -Floor Plan Exhibit C -Census Map Exhibit D -ABC Letter Stating That PCN Is Required Exhibit E -ABC Application Work Sheet Exhibit F -Letter from Applicant Describing Business Plan Resolution of Approval for Public Convenience and Necessity DRC2009-00391 P377 ~~9 I ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ t TOTAL WINE DI mils `I'II AT -~ ,~ ~, _ ti;r alela _. Cy ~ ~ I ~ III ~ FOOTHILL CROSSING ~ _ ~~• ~•• EXHIBIT A ui r O z Q K W Z w e \/ ', _ -O -~ i oNlssoa~ llll+looj 1V 3NIM 1V101 !~ P3 I~~ I~ I¢ EXHIBi~ ~ ~ I I I I 1 I O P379 Y i 26- •~ O ~~ O V~ N t1~ o ~ O V ~ 33?J~ A b'O Z r --. y ~...,a. ~, ~~., ,...,, .; ~ ~ ~ . ~-. 0 O N31S3H~0?J ~ O 1 1 ~ O N3~l1771W •- O ~ N - w > V °o ~ ~~ ~~ ~ N V o V O .~ N ~ ~ o° ~ ~ to ~+uti~.a:A~1a v:9~x'o,`,~,rs;.:,wi:awi~4 ~ i~8''Y~INt~k»ia O Nb'173N~1y0 N O .o -o L m 0 W ~U Z J = ~, ~ ~ .J W _ ~ `~ +r o Q 04 ~~ O O ~ ~ ~ Q -- _ __ . O ti N O` , O O ~.._... _ _ CV _ . ~ O 0 1 i _._.._ ____ ; _ ' ~• O _ -,.. N .~ .: ~ - , ,~, ~. I ~ -~ _ ~ --',~-- O ,~ N ~i O ~ O o ~ N ~ a N ~ ° o ~b'8/H0~ et b'SO1N~13H M t I . .. .... I Nb'W773H ~~-s / ~ O?~ b'~3N1/1€ ._ 00 /, o ~~~ ~ ~ o0 EXHIBIT C P380 CTATF OF CAI IFORNIA- 9L15WE$ RANSPORTATION ANA HOIISINp Ar;ENCV A Id S h n nP p vPmor DEPARTMENT OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE CONTROL _ Riverside District Office ' ; . 3737 Main Street, Ste #900 Riverside, CA 92501 (951)782-4400 Apri19, 2009 Pillsbury Attn: Tom Morgan PO Box 7880 San Francisco, CA 94120-7880 RE: California Fine Wine & Spirits LLC .Premises: 8201 Day Creelc Blvd., Rancho Cucamonga File # 21/42-471252 Deaz Applicant(s): Your application for an alcoholic beverage license at the above referenced location has been assigned to me for investigation. Initial review indicates the following information and/or documents are required to complete the application: ABC Forms O1. ABC-223, Petition for Conditional License -Sign and date. 02. ABC-203, Acknowledgment of ABC Laws, Rules and/or Regulations. 03. ABC-293, Affidavit of Posting ' ' 04. ABC-207D /Notice, Proof of publication in a newspaper of general circulation. ` O5. -ABC-207F/ 500 foot mailing to residence. 06. ABC-208, Personal Affidavit for George Mavrikes & John Jordan Non-ABC Forms 07. Copy of identification from George Mavrilces & John Jordan. 08. Copy of approved Conditional Use Permit from the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 09. Letter of Public Convenience or Necessity from Governing Body. 10. Sign and date enclosed Conditions. 11. Sign and Date enclosed Rule 107Aclcnowledgment 12. Copy of Lease Agreement. ~~~ P381 Your license cannot be processed without the above requested items. Additional information and/or documents may be required upon further investigation. Please mail them to my attention as soon as possible or call to schedule an appointment. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me during normal business hours at (951) 782-4397. Respectfully, ~~ Angela Reveles Licensing Representative II MAY-04-2009 12:11 ABC RIVERSIDE DISTRICT 951 781 0531 P.002/002 „ P382 23958.4 B & P;APT'LICATION'Sr1~ORI{ S~.l•LET ADDRL+SS: LIC~NS)a 7'1'PZ;: . ~~ " QR[!a :in~i4t- `' x. cRrrrr~ R~~oRTZN~ DzsTRrcx :Jurisdiction unable to provide sfsltisticn] data. RepvrtingJ~istrict: j Tobll number of reportiizg districts: Total number of offenses: ' Averstbe number of offenses per dzstrict: I20°Jo of ave,-age number of often§es:~ ~. Total offenses in district: ' Location is within n high crime reiiorfing district: Xes/!`Io 2. CENSUS TRACT UNAUE CONCENTRATION /. ~~ n~ Q72.2.43 ~ ~ • Census Tract: -o`~'v,-~' . Population /C,ount~~ Ratio ~. 11`umber of licenses allowed. ~ • . ' ~;: ~ , lVulziber of esistia;Iicenyes: ~ ~ ~"' i Undue cnncenf~'aHun esists 11S 0 i.nhFnr n{" nnhfic rnm+enicnCC nf' neL'CSyi~~ rC(Illll'Bd ~nVL'rnln6 adp /Applic~nt- EXHIBIT E ire ~ '~5~,0 ,~ TOTAL P.002 MAY-04-2009 12:11 ABC RIVERSIDE DISTRICT 951 781 0531 p.ool~oo~P383 Department of Alcoholic l3everege Control Riverside l]istriot Offca 3737 Main Streat,SUlta 900 Riverside, CA 92501 Phone: 95i-78214A0 Fax: 959-781-0531 C 0.11lo RNlA State of Cdllfomla FAX! TRANSMISSION Total Number of Pages 2 (lnduding this cover sheet) i Orlginal:~TO follow by regular mail ~X Will not follow ro: Tom Morgan Flm,roffice: Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP Fax: (415) 983-1200 Date: 5/4/2009 Time: cc('s): From:. Angela . I Fnone: (951) 782-4397 subicct:. Census Tract Information Comments: NOTICE This communication is intended onty forlhe use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed, and may contain information that is privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of this message is not the intended redpient, you are hereby notlFled that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibhed. If you have received thiscommunication in error, please notify us immediately by telephone, and ~retum the original message to us at the above address. ~iITA ~i ya~r 4 ~a~ omiacwrw+ "Be Energy Efficient" nac7s tlrosl Total Wine 8 MORE PROJECT DESCRIPTION & DETAIL LETTER 8201 Day Creek Boulevazd in the Foothill Crossing shopping center This application is for an application to City Council for a determination of the Public Convenience & Necessity for alcohol sales at this site. Total Wine is requesting type 21 original and 42 original licenses for this location. The hours of operation aze Sunday's Noon to 8:00 pm; Monday through Thursday from 9:00 am-9:00 pm; and Friday's and Saturday's from 9:OOam-10:00pm. More detailed information is below. California Fine Wine & Spirits, LLC dba Total Wine & More proposes to operate an alcoholic beverage sales establishment in an existing building of approximately 25,000 squaze-feet formerly occupied by CompUSA selling a full line of alcoholic beverages but specializing in the sale of fine wines In addition to offering premium wines, spirits and beer for off-sale consumption, Total Wine & More conducts wine education seminars and wine tastings for adults to provide an opporiunity for customers to learn about wine producers, their history and vvine- making techniques. In-store brochures (see attached) announce the education seminaz dates and specialty. Class size is limited to the first 30 customers who enroll and aze held from three to five times a calendaz quarter. The seminars are conducted by experienced wine experts and last approximately a half hour to one hour. Samples will be offered for tasting only to customers in approximately one ounce portions. The dedicated classroom measures approximately 35' x 15'. The wine tasting azea measures approximately 8' x 8' both of which will be covered by sepazate on-sale, ABC Type 421icenses. Minors will not be permitted on the Type 42 premises and Total Wine & More will post signs reading "No Person Under 21 Allowed" in accordance with Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control Rule 107. Total Wine & More is America's lazgest independent fine wine retailer and currently owns and operates 51 stores in ten states. In December 2007, Total Wine & More opened its first California store in Roseville. A second store, in Tustin has a planned opening 1 EXHIBIT I° P384 P385 date of October 16, 2008. A third store, in Northridge is scheduled to open in January 2009. The company's California business plan calls for opening as many as 40 stores in the sate within the coming five years Total Wine & More recruits heavily within the local community; the closer team members live to a store, the higher the retention rate and employment longevity. Each store employs approximately 30 personnel and Total Wine & More tends to offer more full-time jobs than other retailers. The maximum number of employees per shift is ten. Total Wine is sensitive to the needs and requirements of the jurisdictions in which they aze located. As part of this tenant finish, a screen wall will be constructed to screen the cart storage azea in front of the store. This wall is 8 feet tall by 22 feet long and is covered with a wood trellis. The screen wall is constructed of CMU with a finish that will match the existing wall behind. In conjunction with the addition, some pazking lot restriping will be required to meet the City Code requirements. The addition of the screen wall will cause some of the current foundation landscaping to be relocated. The contractor will supply the City with a Tree Relocation application and obtain approval prior to relocating the trees. This application is to allow the sale of alcohol in an existing commercial building that is completely surrounding by existing commercial development. Alcohol sales aze permitted in the RRO/C District with a Conditional Use Permit. 2 P386 RESOLUTION NO. D'7-O~ / A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A DETERMINATION OF PUBLIC CONVENIENCE OR NECESSITY FOR A BEER, WINE AND DISTILLED SPIRITS RETAILER FOR THE ISSUANCE OF A TYPE 21 OFF-SALE GENERAL ABC LICENSE AND ATYPE 42 ON-SALE BEER AND WINE PUBLIC PREMISES ABC LICENSE FOR A SITE LOCATED WITHIN THE FOOTHILL CROSSING COMMERCIAL CENTER ON THE EAST SIDE OF DAY CREEK BOULEVARD AND SOUTH OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, LOCATED AT 8201 DAY CREEK BOULEVARD IN THE REGIONALLY RELATED OFFICE/COMMERCIAL DISTRICT (RRO/C)-APN: 0229-021-78. A. Recitals 1. Total Wine & More filed an application fora Public Convenience or Necessity determination DRC2009-00391, as described in the title of this Resolution, for a Type 21 (Off-Sale General) and a Type 42 (On-Sale Beer and Wine for Public Premises) alcohol license from the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC). 2. Section 23958 of the California Business and Professional Code requires the City of Rancho Cucamonga to make a determination that the issuance of the said license will service the Public Convenience or Necessity. 3. On the 3rd day of June 2009, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga reviewed said application prior to the adoption of this Resolution. 4. All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-referenced meeting on June 3, 2009, including written and oral staff reports, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The site located within the Foothill Crossing commercial center on the east side of Day Creek Boulevard and south of Foothill Boulevard at 8201 Day Creek Boulevard; and b. Total Wine & More is a large alcoholic beverage retailerwhose business model is predicated on serving a regional customer base. The site is located within the Regionally Related Office/Commercial District, which was designed to accommodate this type of retail business; and P387 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. DRC2009-00391 -TOTAL WINE & MORE June 3, 2009 Page 2 c. The site is bordered by Interstate 15 to the east and commercial development to the north, south and west and is not within 1,000 feet of existing or planned residential development; and d. The site is located within Census Tract 0022.03, which encompasses the southeast portion of the City and is mostly zoned for industrial development. The Census Tract also has a number of large commercial developments along Foothill Boulevard and a small residential population. Because of the low residential population, only a small number of alcohol licenses are permitted in the Census Tract before it becomes over-concentrated as designated by ABC. It should be noted that the Census Tract to the north (0020.07) has a large residential population with a small number of commercial and industrial developments, helping to balance out the two neighboring Census Tracts and limiting any negative effects on the neighboring residential areas; and e. The site is not close to sensitive users, such as day care facilities, schools, and/or churches; and f. Rancho Cucamonga residents would be afforded more convenient shopping opportunities with the applicant's large selection of beer, wine, and distilled spirits and the ability to sample and learn about the products they are purchasing. 3. The Planning Department staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines. The project qualifies as a Class 1 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15301, which covers the permitting of existing structures that involve negligible or no expansion of use beyond that existing at the time of the lead agency's original determination. The project consists of issuing a Public Convenience or Necessity determination for a business opening in an existing commercial building. Staff finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment in that the building was intended to be used by a commercial tenant. The City Council has reviewed the Planning Department's determination of exemption, and based on its own independent judgment, concurs in the staff's determination of exemption. 4. Based upon the findings set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, and 3 above, this City Council concludes that the issuance of both a Type 21 Off-Sale General and a Type 42 On-Sale Beer and Wine for Public Premises alcohol license for Total Wine & More at 8201 Day Creek Boulevard will not have a negative impact to the surrounding uses. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this City Council hereby determines that the issuance of both a Type 21 Off-Sale General and a Type 42 On-Sale Beer and Wine for Public Premises for Total Wine and More at 8201 Day Creek Boulevard will service the Public Convenience or Necessity. 6. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 above, this City Council hereby approves the request for a Public Convenience or Necessity determination subject to each of the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference: 7. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this Resolution STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: DRC2009-00391 SUBJECT: APPLICANT: PUBLIC CONVENIENCE OR NE TOTAL WINE & MORE LOCATION: 8201 DAY CREEK BOULEVARD-APN: 0229-021-78 ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: Completion Date A. General Requirements 1. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its _/_/_ agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 2. The applicant shall be required to pay any applicable Fish and Game fees as shown below. The _/_/_ project planner will confirm which fees apply to this project. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to the Planning Commission or Planning Director hearing: a) Notice of Exemption - X50 3. Crime Free Multi-Family Housing Program -The owner shall cause the manager and any _/_/_ resident manager to complete the training for and enroll the project in the San Bernardino County Crime Free Multi-Family Housing Program SC-12-08 I:\PLANNING\FINAL\CITYCNCU2009 stf, res, ord\DRC2009-00391 Std Cond 6-31.doc STAFF REPORT COMMU[~IITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT Date: June 3, 2009 To: From: By: Subject: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager RANCHO cUCAMONGA Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director JoAnn Gwynn, Community Services Supervisor ,J APPROVAL OF A RECOMMENDATION FROM THE PARK AND RECREATION COMMISSION TO APPROVE A LIGHT VARIANCE REQUESTED FOR A MINORS, MAJORS, JUNIORS AND SENIOR DMSIONS ALLSTAR TOURNAMENT HOSTED BY DISTRICT 71 LRTLE LEAGUE DURING JUNE 27JULY 23, 2009, AT HERR'AGE AND RED HILL COMMUNfTY PARKS RECOMMENDATION: The Park and Recreation Commission is recommending that the City Council approve a temporary variance of the Light Usage Policy to allow use until 11:00 p.m. on the little league (60') and senior division (90') fields at Heritage and Red Hill Parks June 27 -July 23, 2009 (excluding Sundays). Any use after 10:00 p.m. will be limited within those parameters as mentioned below and per the requirements listed in the attached Light Variance Policy. BACKGROUND: District 71 Little League, on behalf of Alta Loma and Citrus Little Leagues, who is hosting this regional All-Star Little League tournament, is requesting this particular item. They currently plan to host the Minors and Junior Divisions at Heritage Community Park and the Major and Senior Divisions at Red Hill Community Park. The current sports field policy curfew is 10:00 p.m. The Light Variance Policy allows for light variance requests that would enable youth sports groups to use the field lights past the standard curfew of 10:00 p.m. Monday through Saturday for special occasions such as regional Little League All-Star Playoffs. If a variance to the field policy curfew is approved, this allows games to continue past 10:00 p.m. because injuries, extra innings, or other reasons that have caused game(s) to last longer than scheduled. Most games will conclude by 10:00 p.m. Similar tournaments have been hosted over the past several years and variances have been permitted on a regular basis. The Community Services Department has not received any complaints during the last nine years that Little Leagues All-Star Competitions have been conducted at Heritage and Red Hill Park Community Parks. Some of the more important requirements that the little leagues will be bound to are listed within the Light Variance Policy and include, but are not limited to the following: P389 P390 APPROVAL OF A RECOMMENDATI ON FROM THE PARK AND RECREATION PAGE 2 COMMISSION TO APPROVE A LIGHT VARIANCE REQUESTED FOR A MINORS, MAJORS, JiTNIORS AND SENIORDIVISIONS ALL-STAR TOURNAMENT HOSTED BY DISTRICT 71 LITTLE LEAGUE DURING JUNE 27-JULY 23, 2009, AT HERITAGE TUNE 3, 2009 1. "NO PARKING" signs will be posted on the resident side of streets adjacent to the parks in use on Saturdays and Sundays by the requesting organi2ation with signs provided by the City. 2. Amplified sound systems will be checked prior to the tournament. Staff will drop in unannounced to monitor at least three times a week during the tournament. Announcing will be limited to: • General welcome • Introduction of teams • Announcement of player to the plate • Recap of runs and score between innings • Play-by-play announcing will not be permitted 3. Furthermore, power limits are to be set so as not to exceed 74DBA at 300 feet in circumference from the source or property line, whichever is closer. 4. The P.A. system use will be permitted only between the hours of 9:00 a.m. and 9:30 p.m. Monday through Saturday, unless othervvise approved by City Council. No lights are permitted on Sunday. ANALYSIS: The requested light variance would apply to the three baseball diamonds located at Heritage Park and the two baseball diamonds on the north side of Red Hill Park. Staff requests the City Council continue with their current policy of providing a curfew light variance only for extended, overtime or extra innings, which is necessary for tournament play. At the May 21, 2009 Park and Recreation Commission meeting, the Commission reviewed District 71 Little League's light variance request for the 2009 baseball season and approved staffs recommendation to forward this request to the City Council for final consideration. Resp ctfull ubmitted, Kevin cArd e Community Services Director I:ICOMMSERVICouncilBBoardslCityCouncill StaffReports120091LLLigbNarience60309.doc CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT LIGHT VARIANCE POLICY RANCHO POLICY NO.: 500-40 C;UCAMONGA PAGE 1 OF 3 EFFECTIVE: November 1, 1992 CALIFORNIA REVISED: January, 2001 APPROVED: March 15, 2007 SUBJECT: LIGHT VARIANCE POLICY PURPOSE: To specify guidelines for the request and use of sports field lights after normal operating hours. POLICY: The following procedures will be followed by all community based youth sports organizations who desire to request and use lighted sports fields after normal operating hours. GENERAL POLICIES AND GUIDELINES: There are some occasions throughout the year that may require a youth sporting event to exceed the normal 10:00 p.m. sports fields' light curfew. However, it is important to develop some procedures that insure that neighboring residents are not negatively impacted by an approved light variance. Outlined below is a set of guidelines that specifies a process for requesting such a variance and how it should be implemented. Non-profit community based youth sports organizations may request a variance to extend light use for City park sports fields beyond normal operating hours. Current operating hours conclude at 10:00 p.m. Monday through Saturday and no use of lights is permitted on Sundays. 2. The request must be for a special occasion of some type such as Regional Little League All Star Playoffs, etc. The variance is limited only to games that were scheduled to conclude by 10:00 p.m. but because of injury, extra innings, or other unforeseen circumstances the game was not able to finish in time. Normal league play or practices are not eligible for consideration under this request. 3. A request must be submitted in writing to the Community Services Director two months prior to their requested use. This allows the department to review their request and submit it for review and approval to the Park and Recreation Commission and the City Council. 4. The request must then be presented to the Park and Recreation Commission for their review and approval. 32 LIGHT VARIANCE POLICY PAGE 2 of 3 5. The Park and Recreation Commission must then forward their recommendation to the City Council for their final review and approval. 6. If such a request receives final approval from City Council then that organization must provide home phone numbers and a fact sheet giving details of the tournament. Furthermore, it must be distributed by the leagues or organization to homeowners within two blocks of the City park (s) two weeks before the tournament or event. The flier must be delivered in person to each resident orweighted in some fashion to their doorstep. The flier will include home phone numbers of a district or regional representative and any league presidents. In addition, any pay or designated phones at the sports fields will also be provided so immediate contact can be obtained with the tournament directors. This will be accomplished at league expense. "NO PARKING" signs will be posted on the resident side of streets adjacentto parks in use on Saturdays and Sundays by the requesting organization with signs provided by the City. A separate flier will be distributed to league or tournament participants stating that no noisemakers are allowed and that participants/guests are requested to leave the park area quietly. 9. Overflow parking will be monitored by the requesting organization and signage provided directing participants to park at additional parking facilities nearby. Prior approval must be obtained to use these parking facilities. 10. Organized scheduled athletic events sound amplification equipment will be allowed in City parks, but limited to public address systems, stereo equipment, stationary and portable components and bull horns, subject to the following conditions: a. Request to use the Public Address (P.A.) System must be included on the field use application or submitted separately prior to any usage. b. Amplified sound systems will be checked prior to the tournament or event and the organization must keep the level of sound below the City's required decibel level. Staff will drop in unannounced to monitor at least three times a week during the tournament. A fee of $90 will be paid in advance to cover monitoring costs. If additional monitoring is needed, the user organization will be billed at $10.00 an hour. Announcing will be limited to: • General welcome. • Introduction of teams. • Announcement of player to the plate. • Recap of runs and score between innings. 33 LIGHT VARIANCE POLICY PAGE 3 of 3 c. Furthermore, power limits are to be set so as not to exceed 74DBA at 300 feet in circumference from the source or property line, which ever is closer. No sound from a Community Services approved event can exceed a noise level (slow, 74dBA, "A" weighted scale) measured at the nearest property line, for a cumulative period of not more than five (5) minutes in any one hour, whether or not the sounds are live, recorded, amplified or necessary to the event (i.e. generators). d. All user organizations will be responsible for guaranteeing the sound level not exceed 74DBA. The direction of sound from the P.A. System speakers will be toward spectators and/or bleacher areas and away from residential areas. The P.A. System use will be permitted only between the hours of 9:00 a.m. and 9:30 p.m. Monday through Saturday, unless otherwise approved by City Council. g. Only persons 18 years and older will be allowed to operate the Public Address System. All Public Address System use for athletic events must pertain to the game being played. Special announcements should be kept to a minimum. In no case will play-by-play announcing be permitted. i. Failure to comply with the above requirements by user groups will result in one of the following: First Offense: Verbal warning followed by written communication. • Second Offense: Payment of staff time to monitor sound system at rate set in Music and Amplification Policy at the next set of games. Third Offense: Loss of system use. 11. Sports field lights are to be turned off as soon as possible after the completion of the last game, but not to exceed 11:00 p.m. l: COMMSERVI Policies) Policies-AppravedPoliciesLLightVariancePolic yapproved07 34 P394 STAFF REPORT ENGINEERING DEPART?dENT RANCHO Date: June 3, 2009 C,UCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager From: Mark A. Steuer, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer By: Mark Brawthen, Contract Engineer Subject: APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITY AND ORDERING THE ANNEXATION TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 3 FOR DRC2007-00455, LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF WOODRUFF PLACE BETWEEN HIGHLAND AVENUE AND COTTON CLOUD DRIVE SUBMITTED BY THE CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER-DAY SAINTS RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolutions approving DRC2007-00455, accepting the subject agreement and security, ordering the annexation to Landscape Maintenance District Nos. 2 and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 3, and authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said agreement. BACKGROUND /ANALYSIS: DRC2007-00455, located between Highland Avenue and Cotton Cloud Drive in the Community Facilities District of the Victoria Community Plan Development District, was approved by the Planning Commission on February 27, 2008 for the development of a 16,500 square foot church on 5.06 acres of vacant land. The Developer, The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints, is submitting an agreement and security to guarantee the construction of the off-site improvements in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond: $57,700.00 Bond #SU 110 0846 Labor & Material Bond: $57,700.00 Bond #SU 110 0846 A letter of approval has been received from Cucamonga Valley Water District. The Consent and Waiver to Annexation forms signed by the Developer are on file in the City Clerk's Office. Copies of the agreement and securities are available in the City Clerk's Office. Respectfully submitted, ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT er, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer MAS:MNB;akt Attachments: Resolutions(2) Vicinity Map P395 VICINITY MAP N Cz~ of RANCHO CUCAMONGA Dec 2oo7-OO'~55 ~: Vi ci~t~'Y M~~ DIVISION ~x~rr: P396 RESOLUTION NO. D9-I ©D A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR DRC2007-00455 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement by T.A. Construction as developer, forthe improvement of public right-of-way adjacent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally located on the east side of Woodruff Place between Highland Avenue an Cotton Cloud Drive; and WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be done in conjunction with the development of said real property referred to as DRC2007-00455; and WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified in said Improvement Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, HEREBY RESOLVES as follows: That said Improvement Agreement be and the same is approved and the Mayor is authorized to execute same on behalf of said City and the City Clerk is authorized to attest thereto; and 2 That said Improvement Security is accepted as good and sufficient, subject to approval as to form and content thereof by the City Attorney. P397 RESOLUTION NO. ©q-~O/ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 3 FOR DRC2007-00455 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has previously formed a special maintenance district pursuant to the terms of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, said special maintenance district known and designated as Landscape Maintenance District No. 2, Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3 (referred to collectively as the "Maintenance Districts"); and WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972" authorize the annexation of additional territory to the Maintenance Districts; and WHEREAS, such provisions also provide that the requirement for the preparation resolutions, an assessment engineer's report, notices of public hearing and the right of majority protest may be waived in writing with the written consent of all of the owners of property within the territory to be annexed; and WHEREAS, notwithstanding that such provisions of the 1972 Act related to the annexation of territory to the Maintenance District, Article XIIID of the Constitution of the State of California ("Article XIIID") establishes certain procedural requirements for the authorization to levy assessments which apply to the levy of annual assessments for the Maintenance Districts on the territory proposed to be annexed to such districts; and WHEREAS, the owners of certain property described in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference have requested that such property (collectively, the "Territory") be annexed to the Maintenance Districts in order to provide for the levy of annual assessments to finance the maintenance of certain improvements described in Exhibit B hereto (the "Improvements"); and WHEREAS, all of the owners of the Territory have filed with the City Clerk duly executed forms entitled "Consent And Waiver To Annexation Of Certain Real Property To A Maintenance District And Approval Of The Levy Of Assessments On Such Real Property" (the "Consent and Waiver"); and WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the 1972 Act to the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts and have expressly consented to the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts; and RESOLUTION NO. DRC2007-00455 June 3, 2009 Page 2 WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have also expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the 1972 Act and/or Article XIIID applicable to the authorization to the levy the proposed annual assessment against the Territory set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference and have declared support for, consent to and approval of the authorization of levy such proposed annual assessment set forth in Exhibit C attached hereto; and WHEREAS, at this time the City Council desires to order the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts and to authorize the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit C hereto. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2: The City Council hereby finds and determines that: a. The annual assessments proposed to be levied on each parcel in the Territory do not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on each such parcel from the Improvements. b. The proportional special benefit derived by each parcel in the Territory from the Improvements has been determined in relationship to the entirety of the cost of the maintenance of the Improvement. c. Only special benefits will be assessed on the Territory by the levy of the proposed annual assessments. SECTION 3: This legislative body hereby orders the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts, approves the financing of the maintenance of the Improvements from the proceeds of annual assessments to be levied against the Territory and approves and orders the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit B. P398 SECTION 4: All future proceedings of the Maintenance Districts, including the levy of all assessments, shall be applicable to-the Territory. P399 Exhibit A Identification of the Owner and Description of the Property To Be Annexed The Owner of the Property is Corporation of the Presiding Bishop of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints, A Utah Corporation Sole The legal description of the Property is: PARCEL 1 OF THAT CERTAIN CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE FOR LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT RECORDED FEBRUARY 22, 1990, AS INSTRUMENT NO. 90-068997 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS, AND RE-RECORDED FEBRUARY 23, 1990, AS INSTRUMENT NO. 90-071791 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: THAT PORTION OF LOTS 11 AND 12, IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 203, PAGES 98 THROUGH 102, INCLUSIVE OF MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 12, SAID POINT NORTH 89 DEGREES 49 MINUTES 22 SECONDS WEST 6.00 FEET FROM THE NORTHEASTERLY CORNER OF SAID LOT 12; THENCE SOUTH 00 DEGREES 10 MINUTES 38 SECONDS WEST 307.31 FEET ALONG A LINE PARALLEL WITH A 6.00 FEET WESTERLY FROM THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 12; THENCE SOUTH 45 DEGREES 00 MINUTES 00 SECONDS WEST, 220.89 FEET TO A POINT ON ANON-TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHWESTERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 327.00 FEET, A RADIAL BEARING TO SAID POINT BEARS NORTH 17 DEGREES 17 MINUTES 31 SECONDS EAST; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY 34.67 FEET ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 6 DEGREES 04 MINUTES 31 SECONDS; THENCE NORTH 78 DEGREES 47 MINUTES 00 SECONDS WEST, TANGENT TO SAID CURVE 275.40 FEET TO A POINT ON A TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 273.00 FEET; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY 57.89 FEET ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 12 DEGREES 09 MINUTES 00 SECONDS; THENCE NORTH 66 DEGREES 38 MINUTES 00 SECONDS WEST, TANGENT TO SAID CURVE 49.42 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00 DEGREES 39 MINUTES 57 SECONDS EAST, 23.28 FEET TO A POINT ON ANON-TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE WESTERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 836.00 FEET, A RADIAL BEARING TO SAID POINT BEARS SOUTH 69 DEGREES 57 MINUTES 28 SECONDS EAST, SAID POINT BEING ON THE EASTERLY LINE OF THAT CERTAIN STREET DEDICATION RECORDED FEBRUARY 22, 1990 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 90-068978 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY; THENCE ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE THE FOLLOWING TWO (2) COURSES, 1) NORTHERLY 289.85 FEET ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 19 DEGREES 51 MINUTES 54 SECONDS, AND 2) NORTH 00 DEGREES 10 MINUTES 38 SECONDS EAST, TANGENT TO SAID CURVE 46.05; THENCE ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 12 THE FOLLOWING TWO (2) COURSES NORTH 52 DEGREES 52 MINUTES 24 SECONDS EAST, 21.37 FEET AND SOUTH 89 DEGREES 49 MINUTES 22 SECONDS EAST, 493.34 FEET TO SAID POINT OF BEGINNING. EXCEPTING THEREFROM AN UNDIVIDED ONE-QUARTER INTEREST IN ALL OIL, GAS AND/OR MINERALS, AS RESERVED IN DEED FROM JAMES S. PEARSON TO R.M. WADDELL, RECORDED NOVEMBER 30, 1938, IN BOOK 1321, PAGE 26 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. A-1 P400 ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM ALL OIL, GAS, MINERALS, HYDROCARBON AND KINDRED SUBSTANCES LYING BELOW A DEPTH OF 500 FEET, BUT WITHOUT THE RIGHT OF SURFACE ENTRY, AS CONTAINED IN THE DEED RECORDED JANUARY 28, 1971, IN BOOK 7599, PAGE 739 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO: 1089-011-06-0-000 The above-described parcels are shown on sheet A-3 attached herewith and by this reference made a part hereof. A-2 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2. STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. ~ AND 3 LATTER-DAY SAINTS CHURCH SITE D RC20o'j- Do'}SS APN ~ l0~-oll-a6 crQr. oFCoµPUANCE No.3z5 (LOT 2, TR 13279) LLq, 19 NEW STjtEET TREES 7 _. _ ~ F'~!NC ~ ~~PT W 2 ~u KENYON PARK e v I CTpR~q A,9 ~~ ~2F LEGEND HiGHLA~.ID AVfi,- ConoW CIOtID - 10 a f9 NEW STRE£T TitEES 15 nteW STREET TREES CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA N COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA P401 Item: DRC2007-OO~k55 Title: ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM A-3 P402 Exhibit B To Description of the District Improvements Fiscal Year 2008 / 2009 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 (Victoria Planned Community): Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 (LMD #2) represents landscape sites throughout the Victoria Planned Community. These sites are associated with areas within Victoria and as such any benefit derived from the landscape installation can be directly attributed to those parcels within that community. Because of this, assessments required for this district are charged to those parcels within that planned community. The sites maintained by the district consist of parkways, median islands, street trees, paseos, community trails and parks. The 32.37 acres of parks in Victoria consist of Kenyon Park, Victoria Groves Park, Vintage Park, Windrows Park and Ellena Park. STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (Arterial Streets): Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (SLD #1) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located on arterial streets throughout the City. The facilities within this district, being located on arterial streets, have been determined to benefit the City as a whole on an equal basis and as such those costs associated with the maintenance and/or installation of the facilities is assigned to the City-wide district. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on arterial streets and traffic signals on arterial streets within the rights-of-way or designated easements of streets dedicated to the City. STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 (Victoria Planned Community): Street Light Maintenance District No. 3 (SLD #3) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located within the Victoria Planned Community. Generally, this area encompasses the area of the City east of Deer Creek Channel, south of Highland Avenue, north of Base Line Road, and west of Etiwanda Avenue. It has been determined that the facilities in this district benefit the properties within this area of the City. This sites maintained by the district consist of streetlights on local streets and traffic signals (or a portion thereof) on local streets within the Victoria Planned Community. Proposed additions to Work Program (Fiscal Year 2008 / 2009) For Project: DRC2007-00455 Street Li SLD #3 SLD # Landscapi LMD #2 Number of Lamps SOOL 9500E 16,000E 22,00 city Trail Turf Non-Turf SF SF SF Trees "Existing items installed with original project Assessment Units by District Acres SLD 1 SLD 3 LMD 2 5.06 5.06 5.06 5.06 B-1 P403 Exhibit C Proposed Annual Assessment Fiscal Year 2008 / 2009 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 (Victoria Planned Community): The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $422.00 for the fiscal year 2008/09. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 (Victoria Planned Community): Land Use Type # of Physical Units Assessment Units Factor # of Assessment Units Rate Per Assessment Unit Revenue Single Family parcel 5678 1.00 5678 $422.00 $2,396,116.00 Multi- Family parcel 620 1.00 620 $422.00 $261,640.00 Comm/Ind Acre 57.61 2.00 116 $422.00 $49,532.00 Vacant Acre 337.97 0.25 84.4925 $422.00 $35,655.83 TOTAL $2,742,943.83 The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (DRC2007-00455) is: 5.06 Acres x 1 A.U. Factor x $422.00 Rate Per A.U. _ $2,135.32 Annual Assessment STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (Arterial Streets): The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $17.77 for the fiscal year 2008/09. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (Arterial Streets): # of # of Rate Per Physical Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment Land Use .Unit Type Units Units Factor Units Unit Revenue Single Family parcel 23,640 1.00 23,640 $17.77 $420,082.80 Multi-Family Unit 11,154 1.00 11,154 $17.77 $198,206.58 Commercial Acre 2985.85 2.00 5971.70 $17.77 $106,117.10 TOTAL $724,406.48 The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (Project Number) is: 5.06 Acres x 1 A.U. Factor x $17.77 Rate Per A.U. _ $89.92 Annual Assessment C-1 P404 STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 (Victoria Planned Community): The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $47.15 for the fiscal year 2008/09. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Street Light Maintenance District No. 3 (Victoria Planned Community): # of # of Rate Per Physical Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment Land Use Unit Type Units Units Factor Units Unit Revenue Single Family Parcel 5678 1.00 5678 $47.15 $267,717.70 Multi-Family Unit 620 1.00 310 $47.15 $5,846.60 Commercial Acre 103.53 2.00 207.06 $47.15 $9,762.88 Vacant 10.95 2.0 21.90 $47.15 $1,032.59 TOTAL $284,359.77 The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (DRC2007-00455) is: 5.06 Acres x 1 A.U. Factor x $47.15 Rate Per A.U. _ $238.58 Annual Assessment C-2 P405 CERTIFICATE OF SUFFICIENCY CONSENT AND WAIVER TO ANNEXATION FOR DRC2007-00455 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MARK A. STEUER, the undersigned, hereby certifies as follows: That I am the CITY ENGINEER of the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA. That on the 3rd day of June 2009, I reviewed a Consent and Waiver to Annexation pertaining to the annexation of certain property to the Maintenance District, a copy of which is on file in the Office of the City Clerk. That I caused said Consent and Waiver to Annexation to be examined and my examination revealed that said Consent and Waiver to Annexation has been signed by the owners of all of the property within the territory proposed to be annexed to the Maintenance District. That said Consent and Waiver to Annexation meets the requirements of Section 22608.1 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California. EXECUTED this 3rd day of June 2009, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. ark uer, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STATE OF CALIFORNIA STAFF REPORT ENGINEERING DEPARTn~NT Date: June 3, 2009 To: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager From: Mark A. Steuer, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer By: Willie Valbuena, Assistant Engineer P406 RANCHO cUCAMONGA Subject: APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES AND MONUMENTATION CASH DEPOSIT FOR TRACT 16908, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF ARROW ROUTE, WEST OF BAKER AVENUE, SUBMITTED BY SYCAMORE URBAN PROPERTIES LLC RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution accepting the subject agreement, securities and monumentation cash deposit for Tract Map 16908 and authorizing the Mayor to sign said agreement. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Tentative Tract Map 16908, located on the north side of Arrow Route, west of Baker Avenue, in the Medium Residential District (8-14 Dwelling Units per acre), was approved by the Planning Commission on March 23, 2005. This project is for a subdivision of 3.74 acres of land into one lot for the development of 41 residential condominiums. The original developer, HL Homes, has filed for bankruptcy and has remaining public improvements to be done. The new Developer, Sycamore Urban Properties, is submitting an agreement, securities and monumentation cash deposit to guarantee the construction of the remaining public street improvements in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Cash Bond $ 10,900.00 Labor and Material Cash Bond $ 10,900.00 Monumentation Cash Deposit $ 2,450.00 Copies of the agreement and securities are available in the City Clerk's Office. Respectfully submitted, Mark A. Steuer Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer MAS:WV/akt P407 ,4~C'DW CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA fODJf//LL ~ ,BL ~/D. Q ITEM: ~[ i4CT /~j'948 TITLE: y/C//~//j'Y /I J~~ ENGINEERING DIVISION P408 RESOLUTION NO. O~I'~ D2 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES AND MONUMENTATION CASH DEPOSIT FOR TRACT 16908 WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Map 16908, submitted by the original developer, HL Homes Corporation, and consisting of a subdivision of 3.74 acres of land into one lot for the development of 41 residential condominiums, located on the north side of Arrow Route, west of Baker Avenue, in the Medium Residential District (8-14 Dwelling Units per acre), was approved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga on March 23, 2005; and WHEREAS, Tract Map 16908 is the final map of the division of land approved as shown on the Tentative Tract Map; and WHEREAS, all the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the installation of the remaining public street improvements by the City Council of said City have now been met by posting the Improvement Securities and Monumentation cash deposit by Sycamore Urban Properties LLC, as the new developer; and NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, HEREBY RESOLVES, that said Improvement Agreement, Improvement Securities and Monumentation Cash Deposit submitted by said new developer be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. P409 STAFF REPORT ~ ' ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT RANCHO Date: June 3, 2009 CUCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager From: Mark A. Steuer, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer By: Mark Brawthen, Contract Engineer Subject: APPROVAL OF DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE DEFERRAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND BELLA VICTORIA, LP (DEVELOPER/OWNER) FOR THE RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A" OF THE AGREEMENT GENERALLY LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF EAST AVENUE AND MILLER AVENUE AND IDENTIFIED AS TRACT MAP NO. 17919 RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolution approving the subject agreement for development impact fee deferral and authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said agreement. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Staff received a request to deferral of development impact fees from Bella Victoria, LP regarding residential property generally located at the northwest corner of East Avenue and Miller Avenue. The Developer/Owner has completed the agreement for deferral of development impact fees and has met all the requirements and is willing to be bound by the provisions of the agreement with respect to paying said impact fees. A copy of the agreement is available in the City Clerk's Office. Respectfully submitted, uer Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer MAS/MNB:akt Attachment(s): Vicinity Map Resolution P410 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGW~ER[NG DNISION u rTEm: _U; c -N-Ty MgP TrTLE: TRACT N0. 17919 ELI-IIBIT P411 RESOLUTION NO. ~'7 - ~ ~J A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE DEFERRAL AGREEMENT WHEREAS, Bella Victoria, LP desires to develop residential property located at the northwest corner of East Avenue and Miller Avenue within the City of Rancho Cucamonga in compliance with the State Subdivision Map Act and Local Ordinance No. 802 adopted pursuant to the Act; and WHEREAS, Bella Victoria, LP desires to defer development impact fees until occupancy of said developed residential property; and WHEREAS, the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the development impact fee deferral agreement have now been met by entry into an Agreement with said Developer/Owner. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE that said Agreement is hereby approved, and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Agreement on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest and is hereby authorized to file record. Donald J. Kurth, MD., Mayor ATTEST: Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk P412 STAFF REPORT PUBLIC WORKS SERVICES DEPARTMENT Date: June 3, 2009 To: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager From: Jim Howell, Interim Public Works Services Director By: Jeff Barnes, Parks and Landscape Maintenance Superintendent ' ~~ r~ RANCHO C,UCAMONGA Subject: Authorization to execute a 30 year Lease Agreement at the rate of $1.00/year with Cucamonga Valley Water District, allowing for the installation and maintenance of their Central Collection Units at four City buildings in a cooperative effort to facilitate their new "fixed network meter reading system" project. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council authorize the execution of a 30 year Lease Agreement at the rate of $1.00/year with Cucamonga Valley Water District, allowing for the installation and maintenance of their Central Collection Units at four City buildings in a cooperative effort to facilitate their new "fixed network meter reading system" project. BACKGROUNDIANALYSIS In 2002 the City entered into a similar 30 year agreement with the CVWD for the installation of City owned radio communications equipment in order to send and receive data from the Calsense irrigation controllers located throughout the City. CVWD has recently requested that the City of Rancho Cucamonga enter into a reciprocal agreement to allow for the installation of their central collection units on the roofs of 4 City buildings -Central Park, Cultural Center, Epicenter and Corporate Yard. The units will be mounted behind the building's roof parapet wall hidden from street view; antennas however will extend above the wall. This project is water conservation oriented, and the data collected will also be useful to the City -for example, water leak detection on building or landscaped sites is one of the benefits to us. Usage data received from the CCU's will benefit the District in multiple ways -remote wireless meter reading, leak detection, and identification of users whom exceed the new "Maximum allowable water allotment" are examples of the usefulness of this technology. Respectfully su Jim well Int i Public Works Services Director JH:jwb STAFF REPORT 1/NGINEERING $ERl'ICES DEPdRTbIENT Date: June 3, 2009 To: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager From: Mark A. Steuer, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer By: Mike Olivier, Senior Civil Engineer r'va P413 . ~ , RANCHO cUCAMONGA Subject: APPROVAL AND EXECUTION OF A COMMON USE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE SAN BERNARDINO FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT AND THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FOR AMULTI-USE TRAIL SYSTEM ALONG DAY CREEK CHANNEL AND DEER CREEK CHANNEL It is recommended that the City Council approve and authorize the execution of a Common Use Agreement between the San Bernardino County Flood Control District and the City of Rancho Cucamonga for amulti-use trail system along Day Creek Channel and Deer Creek Channel. BACKGROUNDIANALYSIS In January, 1993, the San Bernardino County Flood Control District (DISTRICT) and the City of Rancho Cucamonga approved a Memorandum of Understanding (M.O.U.) for development of multi- use regional trail system within portions of DISTRICT right-of-way in the City. This M.O.U. listed fifteen (15) DISTRICT flood facilities that in the future could be utilized as common uses between the DISTRICT and the City. The M.O.U. stated that the City provide the DISTRICT with a conceptual Multi-Use Trail System Plan. This was done by the City and approved by the DISTRICT in May, 1993. According to this agreement, development and construction of individual portions of the approved conceptual plan shall be accomplished under separate agreements, as different sections of the DISTRICT'S facilities become available for common use. When the City completed the recreational trail (aka Pacific Electric Trail) across the DISTRICT'S Day and Deer Creek Channels right-of-way along the previous alignment of the Southern Pacific Railroad, the DISTRICT initiated the subject agreement opening up a common use agreement, if the City desired, along the DISTRICT'S right-of-way on Day and Deer Creek Channels from Base Line Road to Highland Avenue. The City does desire opening up a multi-use trail system on Day and Deer Creek Channels between Base Line Road and Highland Avenue, which is intended for use by a variety of residents of the community, including hikers, joggers, bicyclists and equestrians. Also, the City has applied for Federal Safe Routes to School funding along Deer Creek Channel, which will access to Victoria Groves Elementary School, once the trail is constructed. Enclosed are six originals of the subject Common Use Agreement. It is recommended that the City Council approve this agreement for multi-use trails along Day and Deer Creek Channels for the aforementioned reasons. If approved, please sign all six agreements. Res ubmitted, r Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer 0 14 PROJECT AREA MAP ~I ~ 5 v¢TmR :<. =r. {q~p i ~ M~ mRn I.Rlltlpll R R R ~ FONTANA y ll / _ 11 RR~. ~~ PROJECT LOCATION T~SRR 7q 6q tll~T ONTARIO CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MULTI-USE TRAIL SYSTEM ALONG DAY CREEK BLVD. N AND DEER CREEK CHANNELS (FROM BASE LINE RD. TO ffiGHLAND AVE.) N.T.S. O P415 STAFF REPORT PL`BLIC WORKS SERVICES DEPARTMENT Date: June 3, 2009 To: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager From: Jim Howell, Interim Public Works Services Director By: Ernest Ruiz, Streets, Storm Drains and Fleet Superintendent { ~~ r r-_ ,~ RSNCHO C,UCAMONGA Subject: ACCEPT THE BIDS RECEIVED, AWARD AND AUTHORIZE THE EXECUTION OF A CONTRACT EFFECTIVE JULY 1, 2009 THROUGH JUNE 30, 2010 WITH REPUBLIC ITS, INC. OF NOVATO, CALIFORNIA FOR THE "CITYWIDE TRAFFIC SIGNAL MAINTENANCE" TO BE FUNDED FROM ACCOUNT NUMBER 1176303-5300. (MEASURE "I") AND AUTHORIZE THE CITY MANAGER OR HIS/HER DESIGNEE TO ADJUST THE SPENDING LIMIT OF SAID CONTRACT ON AN AS NEEDED BASIS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE APPROVED PUBLIC WORKS SERVICES DEPARTMENT SIGNAL MAINTENANCE BUDGET LINE ITEM 5300 AND AUTHORIZE THE CITY MANAGER OR HIS/HER DESIGNEE TO RENEW SAID CONTRACT UPON MUTUAL CONSENT FOR ADDITIONAL ONE (1) YEAR RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council accept the bid received, award and authorize the execution of a contract effective July 1, 2009 through June 30, 2010 with Republic ITS, Inc. of Novato, California for the "Citywide Traffic Signal Maintenance" to be funded from account number 1176303-5300 (Measure I) and authorize the City Manager or his/her designee to adjust the spending limit of said contract in the future on an as needed basis in accordance with the approved Public Works Services Signal Maintenance budget line item 5300 and authorize the City Manager or his/her designee to renew said contract upon mutual consent for additional one (1) year periods. BACKGROUND ANALYSIS Bids for the subject project were solicited per previous Council action and were opened in the office of the City Clerk at 2:00 p.m. on April 21, 2009 (see attached Bid Summary). Three prospective bidders attended the pre-bid conference. One bid was received and staff has reviewed the bid documents and found Republic ITS, Inc. of Novato, California to be the lowest responsive, responsible bidder. Republic ITS, Inc. is the current signal maintenance contractor and has provided excellent service during the past several years and staff is satisfied with the quality of work perFormed. This maintenance contract may be extended for one-year periods by agreement between the City Manager or his/her designee and the Contractor. City staff recommends the contract be awarded to Republic ITS, Inc. Public Works Services Director DB:ER:pf P416 BID SUMMARY FOR BID OPENING APRIL 21, 2009 APPARENT LOW BIDDER Ci wide Traffic Si nal Maintenance Re ublic ITS UNIT NO QTY UNIT DESCRIPTION COST AMOUNT 1. 1 LS Wei hted Total Bid $156,350.00 $156,350.00 TOTAL $156,350.00 P417 .- . j STAFF REPORT L'vcmisr:aitic Srat~~x:rs Dr;>>,vrrMeN~r RANCHO Date: June 3, 2009 C,UCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager From: Mark A. Steuer, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer By: Romeo M. David, Associate Engineer ~'V' Shelley Hayes, Assistant Engineer ~/. Subject: ACCEPT THE BIDS RECEIVED AND AWARD AND AUTHORIZE THE EXECUTION OF THE CONTRACT IN THE AMOUNT OF $199,936.90 TO THE APPARENT LOW BIDDER, SILVIA CONSTRUCTION INC., AND AUTHORIZE THE EXPENDITURE OF A 10% CONTINGENCY IN THE AMOUNT OF $19,993.69, FOR THE BANYAN STREET PAVEMENT REHABILITATION FROM BERYL STREET TO ARCHIBALD AVENUE TO BE FUNDED FROM PROP. 16 FUNDS, ACCOUNT NO. 11943035650/1679194-0 RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council accept the bids received and award and authorize the execution of the contract in the amount of $199,936.90 to the apparent low bidder, Silvia Construction Inc., and authorize the expenditure of a 10% contingency in the amount of $19,993.69, for the Banyan Street Pavement Rehabilitation from Beryl Street to Archibald Avenue, to be funded from Prop. 1 B Funds, Account No. 11943035650/1679194-0. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Per previous Council action, bids were solicited, received and opened on April 21, 2009, for the subject project. The Engineer's estimate for the base bid was $287,000.00. Staff has reviewed all bids received and found them to be complete and in accordance with the bid requirements with any irregularities to be inconsequential. Staff has completed the required background investigation and finds the apparent low bidder meets the requirements of the bid documents. The scope of work consists of cold milling, asphalt concrete pavement, ARHM overlay, A.C. sidewalk; adjust all utilities to new grade, installation of striping and raised pavement markers and loop detectors. The contract documents call for thirty (30) working days to complete this construction. Respectfully submitted, -~~~~-- ar euer Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer MAS/RMD/SH:Is Attachments 318 VICINITY MAP SITE ...~-- ~~ ^ HILLSI E D ~ ILSO AVE N ~ Cj W BAN T a EMO V- U ~ ~ 19 H T w w 30 N ~ ~ LINE D HUR ST FOOTHILL BLVD m ~ ^ ~ ^ ~~ ~ ~ ~ > ..............¢ n~......~ ......~ ....g, II THOMAS GUIDE PAGE 572 GRID-G3, H3 k J3 VIC70RI PARK BNSF CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BANYAN STREET PAVEMENT REHABILITATION FROM BERYL STREET TO ARCHIBALD AVENUE .r N N.T.S. U 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N 0 o 0 N 0 o 0 0 0 0 w F 0 o o ~ ci N o W o o m ~D o o c6 M 0 to 0 o 0 p a 5 p ,~ ~ o ~ o ~ ~ o p p N N 'y O O O N O O O O O O O N O O O N O O O O 999 '~ N O O r +fl ~ O £A O ~D C f9 O O W M O M O N .7 V ~ f9 ~ ~ £R di z 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 o 0 o~ 0 o o 0 O 0 O o O a ~ o o N ~ o ~ ~ o .. .. o ,~ V ~ r ~ ~ ~ ~ y m 7 . a ~ ~ ~ u ~ ~' r ~ 3 ° ~z o '" U o o o in N c~ o o 0 o 0 rn 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 y s D ~ m o rn M o o &3 -. to ~ r N r a r £R o a -~ N M o Q w a U ~ ~ r ~ t~ ~ M rn ~ fR W o O O O o O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O o O O O O O 'r O ~ M y N ~ O O ~ O ~ i + a F o 00 v, N ~ - ~ ~ v, N v, ~D m O ~ 00 v, N zs N v, ~ ~ m ~ "' `a W m a W o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 f ~ .F. vi O O O u7 CV O h O O ~ •- O O O O O O O O ~ ~ U O ~- N h ~- O O ch O z W ~ o ~ .= ~'~ J r~ .i O ¢ d' W ~ Z (~ ¢ O E' LF W n'S J W Z C7 azw oZ ~ > > oz ~ N Q ~ z0 w o z ?~ a c z7 a .] d Ca O~ ~ wY O~ w xz ~ ~ _ ~ c .. ~ ~ z mm Q. Q Q m C7 g ~ ~ O ~ Q ~ cn p p z O C9 .. ~ 2~ ww W~ d j~ Q Z w O ¢ J Z U W S ~ w "" °~ E.,,~ C7 pZ ~~ U j ~ a >~ ~0 ~ 0 ~~ m~~ O ~ YQ ~a ? ~ ~ H a ~ Q¢ C p¢ W fw-t- zo ~n. W z ~z ~ Z ~ ~ ~ o C7~O FZ ¢ ~ j ~~ ' ~z0 ~ ZI- z O Q W E.y a Z¢ Z J - ~ J ~- O ~- U J W J U LL W W J J ' ~" W ~" o.~ ~ ~ ¢U~ w~g S aJ O J S ~o 7Cn ~ S W F- a>~ L i ¢ W d >~ ¢ i-- ¢ ~ E-~ Q Jw cnZ O ^z o? cn¢~ ~ ¢O z z ~ W ~ ^ U~C7 ¢- U ¢¢ ¢w ¢do ~ n.U - r 77 .'". W a F Z Z ~ F a q v~ ~ ~ -i O I- )- O ¢ W ¢ W O ti ~ ~ ~ ~ ¢ W Q W W p~ ~ CQ ~' " a N OJ 47 ~- N r `- ~ N ~ d v ~ ~ c o zz °z •-. N M 7 ~ l0 [~ c0 O~ O .. P419 ,-i 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 E" tc 0 0 o r rn o M o o Q o ~ o ~ n > rn ~ ~ ~ v N a~ ~ a ~ N ~ c ~ ~ U ~ ~ ~ z ~' ++ N H W O N O O O O O O O O F F N o ~ ~ c~i ~ ,ri o ~ o~ 0 ~ 0 0 N 0 O V O fR ~ (R P C 'J ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ U 0 o 0 o 0 v 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o o O a i Z O O O N N ~ O ~ O N O~ O O O O O W .i N ~ v3 i O u' O ~ r i rn m ~ ~ ±n r~ n ~ s s n c N H ° °a PO '~ o O 0 O 0 N 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O C F F °o ~ yr N °o °n' o° °o i°n °o ~ W y p p U o N vT vi c~ v3 yr o ~ o ~ c~ r9 v Vr t7 in ,~ ° °o °a °o °o ion, °o °o o° °o 00 F 2 (V n O ~ W ~ o v N m a ` ° O N ~ VJ ° O ° p . . ~ ~ ~ n N o ~ ~ c ~ N i ~ ] ~ f9 `R u n ~ N 0 G U ~ to ~ F ,'~ (/~ r-i z U V ° °o ° °o °o ~°n °o o° °o o° Q .F. VFi n h E9 N ~ ~ O N ~ h a y p P U ~- 64 s4 ~O ~ ~+9 O ~ ~D ~ (") FA h M a ~ ~i ~ ~ O Q O fy ~ W ° o~ ~ W J Z oZ azU ~ o ~ > O > ~ J Q U Cn J N~ 1 / z O W Z ll1^1 V Q z~ a ~~I~~1 V A a' A U~ >~ w oga XZ W d N a Q ~ _ m~ a~ Z Q w= I-F- ~ p 0 ~ "~^ co '~Z mm 111 W ~ ~ >~ O~ 7W C J H , z~ x ~~ w~ a ' W Qz > =a d J O . z_U w ~ ~ W Ri U p F R ' U' ^z W'fn c> a a J ~ li wO w m~~ ~ Y~ Qa U ~ ~ , A W Q a Z p Q w w z ~ ~~ Qn' j a W ~ z O ~? ~ W z 0.1 ,G ~ O C~J U~ Q ~~ ~W a.F ZO U ~w ZF- z O U w W ~ p =~ ~ ~ ~ Q~m u ~ d Qp p c i~x c i~ . a Q Q '~ F, ~ J W ~ UU O o? oz cn¢~ ~ ¢O ~ U ~ W rFi1 v U~C~ Q? U Qw Q¢ ¢a0 I- dU z z ~ CG "'~ F Z 2 ~ H~ p~ ,~ a cn ~ o ti ~- ~ e W ¢ W o 4- ~ ~ h ~ e W e W w z ~, Q ~ ' a v N ~ ~ ~ N ~ ~ .. N ~" O ~ci c o .- z ~ O z -~ N (~"1 V N O ~ W O~ O P420 N, m 0 o 0 w 0 ~n 0 o 0 o 0 M 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 o ~ e L ~ F tc o o 0 in 0 o 0 cu'v o ~°n n ~ o ~°o 0 ~°o 0 a 0 o°+ ~ e z > O ° ° ° ~ uN v, io _ r~. _ i v, ~ O a F p ~ +~ ~ ~ ro `e ~ Z F Ik ~ W W °o ° ~ °o °o ° °o °o °o o° F~" z ~., F o of ~ `~ vi o -~ ~ 0 0 ~ 0 0 ~ ~ ~o D U o o ~ ~ , ~ ~ ~ ~, a ~, U L o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 rr O F O o o W w ~o to ~ o O a ~n O o ~n N m n O o v O 0 N 0 O 0 ~j ~ U ~ D in o~ n ~ ri n > o~ o vi cv c~ ~ ~ .: V. O V3 ~M fR fR m ~ fA f9 tR ,~ z ~ y a °o o° N °o °o °o °o °o o °o ~ W ~ ~ N M D U O ~ !fl Yf ~ fA N O M f9 Vf ~ ~ ° 0 O 0 o o 0 O 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 O o o D O M n O tp ~D M ° ~ Z a ~ ~ u ~° O O~ ~ N ~ ~ i ~ F ~ ~ ~ l ~ n ~ ., ~ ~ e a ~ O O N O O O O O O O .Fi y ~ ~ 6q O N ~ O O N ~ 'Z ~ P U ~`] ^ 69 N Eq fy fq FA O p' O tp M 69 LL') t9 N ~ ^ ~ Eq z ° w ~ w ~ ,a ~ w > J ~a z 0 0~ p z ~ O > ~? F J Q Z p F- U ~ J Z Z J~~ Q " pQ ~ Z Q ~ xz d a ~ ~ .a Q CC ,Q~ m~ >~ aQ Z W ~ O~ W= ~O w ~ z0 ~ d p z S mm ww g ~ >~ o¢ N J ~ ~~ .. r W ~O F-o n a w Qz > =Q d J O zU w ? U ~ w U p F CG C7p oz ~c Zc i ~ a J ~ ~ wO w m~~ ~ Y~ Qa U ~ a W ~ ¢a . pd w w zo rF- maF z ~? ~ z as C z O vi Uc~ z Q Qg ~~ aw ~ ~rt- O O I-w Z O C W F w ~ W ~ Z Q z ~> J? Q~ d (n S > lnp J W Qom U W W W ~J J J J J ~ 0. ~ ~ W ~ ~ d J v ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ d > U w ~ > ~ F ~ F ~ Q E,,, ~ W~ °~ a Jw U~C~ v> Q? O U o? Q W oz QQ rn¢~ QdO F QO dU Z Z ~ ~ ~ z ~ ~ o ti ~- c Q ¢ o ti ~ ~ Q Q .~ ~ W -~ q W W ~ ~ W W p~ ~ W F ^ a N N ^ ~ .- .- .- n N ~+ O' v ~ ici ~ ._ O z .. N M V u] ~O n of O O .. P421 (~7 V! 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ F o o co ~0 e 0 o 0 o o c6 m 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ ~,y ] O N M Q N V W O R O ..i '~~" ~ i9 ~ fA ~ ~ N y3 ~ ~ f9 ~ N N E„ U 6 a U ,a o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a ~ y O 0 t~ ~ N fA O O O O W ~ O W O O O O h W ~ U 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ O o N Yt yr V1 fA fA f9 U O o O 0 O 0 O 0 O o N m O 0 O 0 O 0 O o N v z F o o m ~ ° = 0 0 0 o b ^~ Z N M N W N of O W V N r y ~ ~ fR ~ N3 fA !9 ~ Vj 69 Vt f9 fA N N 4G w t° O w z y °o °o o °o °o m °o °o °o °o w E. F o ~o O ci ~ o N c~ ° ~ v 0 0 0 0 ° W V z O a U N ffi v3 F» , o c o N N fn ~ .~ r» ~ ~ x 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O F z ~ rn ° o ch °o o~ n r> r~i q °o o °o o °o ao o 0 ,N. Q~ O P ~ di ~ ~ fA f9 fA 0, ~ ~ a ~CF. fR Hi f9 ~ £y ' N C ~ l U °o °o °o °o °o °o °o °o °o °o w U E. F " h ~ ~ h ~ ~ O O O O z 0 ~ ~ ' ~ ~ o ~' v~ o o v ~ o ~ U V ~ O ~ I~ ~ ~- ~ O o ~ ~ ~ ~ O z¢ ~+ W ° otS W J Z z azw oo o ~a ~ > ° ; o ~ z N~ zo W z ~ ~ ~ Z g ~ ~ ~ o ~ . ¢' -- QF Q w Y ¢ X ~ X ~ ~ to d R1 m J a¢ Z ~ m ~0 ~ ~ O ~ z~~ mm W w J Q >~ O~ C7 W J Q U oW„ ~ U ~ ~ ° ~ ~ W J > W w W ~ Y a ~ ~' oz d z¢ z0 a ~w w~ m~w a ~ z ¢ z U ~ ~ a w O c ¢ vi pQ U w z z° ¢¢ I- ¢~ ~ F~ O g ° z O a z p ~ Fw a ¢o° =~ ° U a ¢ ¢ a F ~ ~ ~w~ can0 O o? oz uai¢~ ~ ¢O ~ ~ ~ w~ a O~C~ ¢? O ¢w ¢¢ ¢a° r n.U z z ~x`~ = z z F a q r/1 w 5 v, ~ o F- > ~ Q W a W o ti ~, ~ v~ ~ Q W e W p z tl a a ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~. N z ~ ~ N M 7 In l0 !~ N O O P422 d' O 0 o 0 o 0 a 0 o 0 0 0 0 o o n w o N o ~0 m 0 U R F o c n m n m °o n vri rn m fJ F '~J N N ~O ~D (~I f0 O u'] b th ~ ~ O (9 P ~ i9 H .N. V3 &3 M y ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N N a o ~ U e F O ° W O ~ m C o m °i ~ O '~ in L °o °o a °o o °o °o o`"o ~ °m 0. m o m w ~ n °s o ~ a ~ a ~ N df N .n ~p v, &i O ; to (") v, b «, w ~ ~ ~ 0 0 0 o 0 c 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 a y f O O~ O C N W N O M P ~ '~]i w ~ O vl N I~ ~p S N ~ K M ~p O~ ~D ~ ~p N O N W ~ p O ~ N» n n vt rn w O U ~ "' w M W J ¢~ ~ o o 0 o 0 r 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ w~ O T bi M ~ W ~ O a N ~j C~i ~G a U O N -~ ~ Yt ~O ~ fA ~O ~ b N N ~ V ~ N H fg U O O N O o O ~ O o O O N ~ ~ W ~ ~D ~rj P O N b F O~ O O O O O vi a O o y N ~ ? N N M p. M Q. O ~p O m z N «, M «~ - + «, M tli M di fA M W b ro 5 0 "' a a ° F rvl' F ° O r N G Ti Q u`J O N N W ~ ~ ~ b N N `" x ~ o m o °o °o v °o °o °o °o E' e t0 Q O C ~ Ni h V ~ O O O ~ h Q O [j 0 7 U cy EH N ~ ~ ~ rj cp M t bi x ~ °~ z O J O D ¢ ~ ~ j C7 ¢ [~- w w ~o w J z~ Tz~ $ O~ pZ J Q ~ > O j oz J~ w U ~ d~ ? O Z ~ ~ ?~ a ~ ~ a > o z~a~i m ~ g ~ _ ~~ ~w ° z W x ~~ w~ a w ¢z =¢ J zc~ w ~ W CG U O p ~~ J > W W ' J ~ iozQ oQ Zc> W a °W wo W maW a ~ Q! as F v ~ ~ ~. o C~J a ~~ ~W zo ~ z~ ? ~ _ U V F ~' Z j Z J p d F~ F O J W m U W J J J ~ a J ~ = ~ ~ 4 ~ W ~Q Jw~ d v~O O - i pZ ~p pZ dw(n V~Qp Q ~ >~ ¢O F- cn H ~ ~ cFzl ~ o U~C~ ¢? U ¢~ ¢¢ ¢d^ H aU z z ~ a a F z i ~ F ~ v] ~ p 7 v~ ~ O F- > t~ ¢ W ¢ W O F- v~ -~ v~ ~ W W _ C7 z n Q ~ ' V Q N b N 47 N 1~ N O t 0 h t D z ~ z N M v in b n co rn o P423 N 0 0 0 o 0 N 0 o 0 o 0 m 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a U ~ o o ~ o ~ ~ v v ~ vi m of a o o ~ 0 a'"o. 0 o o o e m ~o W~ „~ 0 ~ ~ a~4 O rn N tR O ~ ~ yr N ra N ra N v3 ~ ~ e ~~ ~ ~ a sl p. °o o ~ o o °w °0 0 0 0 fA p .E', aFi oo rn in N ~ rn N °i rn a O V3 ffr C f9 O 00 N O C9 c~ of a ° c°v vtOi ~ vMi s `Qn ro Z F vi ~o ~ N .. N N ~o e ~ ~ rn ~ ~ m ~ .. M ~ o o N ~ n n ~ N a N c~ N N e a ~ y ~ ~ ~ ~ ° c"'s ~ ~ v. F a' r v> N "' ~ z U1 ra N V ~ OOi ~ h ~ M h ~ ~ ~ ~ C .H. E, LL'i ~ R ~ ~ ~ ~ M N ~ ~ ~ tD M N ~ C ~ F z o N M (~ ~ fR fq ~ ~ ' ~ O ¢ FO i ~i (n W ° a2S Q W J Z Ur a z w O ° ° Q ~ o > ~ ? Z o r .. N F ' U z f- U c!1 ¢ p J~ U Z CA z d ~ a F o ~- W Z o Z~ a C 7 . r ~ . ~a a H C7 4 W Y ¢ w X O~ X Z - ~ ~ ~ . > J W a 0 ~ ~¢ ~ m a~ a ~ ~x o~ ~, o Z Wx'~~' ~~ w~ a ' ly QZ > ~~ a -~ O Z_Q ~ j W CG U p H C4 (~° °z d'v~ cU Q a J ~ ~ wo W m~~ ~ Y J Qa U Q' ~ q W ~ Q¢ Z pQ w w z° FF- maw z ~? ~ z a~~ ~ O~c~ ~z a ~~ ~W ~zo ~ z~ °z_ o W o~ W ~ Z¢ ~>? J- ¢° J a (~ v~ix ~ c~n0 J W J ¢~07 U w W W ~J J J J J ~ ~ w~~ aU o ~ ~ a j~ w >g . ~ a c ~ Jw cn o z ° ° °z cn¢° ~ ¢O ~ vi a F _ z z ~ ~ o I ~- ¢ Q o I ~ ~ Q e q v~ ~ - ~ W W - ~ ~ W W w pa ~ ~ ~' ~- 7 N N 47 ~- e- ~- 1~ N ~ d v~ coo ~ci ~ ~ .~ z O z ^~ N M 7 to l0 [~ OJ ~ O P424 STAFF REPORT ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT RANCHO C,UCAMONGA Date: June 3, 2009 To: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager From: Mark A. Steuer, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer By: Willie Valbuena, Assistant Engineer Subject: APPROVAL OF AN ADDENDUM TO REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT (SRA-55) FOR RECONSTRUCTION OF PAVEMENT AND OVERLAY RECONSTRUCTION OF MEDIAN LEFT TURN LANES AND TRAFFIC SIGNAL RELATED IMPROVEMENTS WITH DEVELOPMENT OF PARCEL MAP 17818, SUBMITTED BY FOOTCHESTER PARTNERS I, LLC, TO BE FUNDED FROM TRANSPORTATION ACCOUNT NUMBER 11243035650/1026124-0 P425 It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution approving an addendum to Reimbursement Agreement (SRA-55) for reconstruction of pavement and overlay reconstruction of median left turn lanes and traffic signal related improvements with development of Parcel Map 17818 and authorizing the Mayor to sign said amendment and the City Clerk to record the same. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS A Reimbursement Agreement (SRA-55) was approved by the City Council on March 18, 2009, and recorded on March 26, 2009, as Document No. 2009-0128440 in the office of the County Recorded, San Bernardino County, California. The agreementwas forthe reimbursementfrom the City for reconstruction of pavement and overlay reconstruction of median left turn lanes and traffic signal related improvements. The agreement acknowledged the developer still had the opportunity to submit a more itemized accounting requesting additional funds. Upon review by City Staff, the remaining final Engineering cost is $ 70,000.00, to be reimbursed from the City Transportation Reimbursement Account Number 11243035650/1026124-0. Copies of the agreement signed by the Developer are available in the City Clerk's office. A copy of the recorded Reimbursement Agreement (SRA-55) identified as Document Number 2007-0701031 has been attached for reference. u miffed, ~'l/~~ euer Director of Engineering Services/ MAS/W V: rlc City Engineer P426 ~17Y oF' ~-l R~N~H O NE READ w~ ~; z-~ a z w .Q ~U~~Iwl~1 w ~-- ~ cn w~ _~ ~• ~., pW :F~OIJTE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGINEERING DIVISION ti ,.. ~~~ ~i~ .; ~ . ~~. ~;.,,~ ;~ ~L1/D• N ITEM: I" M ~ 780 TITLE: /~Ci ~II ~I / M/4p P427 RESOLUTION NO. ©q- ~ D A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AN ADDENDUM TO REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT (SRA-55) FOR RECONSTRUCTION OF PAVEMENT AND OVERLAY RECONSTRUCTION OF MEDIAN LEFT TURN LANES AND TRAFFIC SIGNAL RELATED IMPROVEMENTS WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted Resolution No. 09-045 on March 18, 2009, accepting a Reimbursement Agreement (SRA-55) from Footchester Partners I, LLC; and WHEREAS, said Reimbursement Agreement (SRA-55) was recorded in Official Records of San Bernardino County, Califomia on March 26, 2009 as Document No.2009-0128440; and W HEREAS, anyfees related to Reimbursement Agreement (SRA-55) shall not apply to Parcels 1 thru 6 of Parcel Map 17818 and also identified as Assesor Parcel Numbers 229-023-01 thru 06. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, does hereby approve said addendum to Reimbursement Agreement (SRA-55) for Assessor Parcel Numbers 229-023-01 thru 06 and that the City Clerk shall cause said amendment to be recorded in the office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino County, Califomia. STAFF REPORT ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT Date: June 3, 2009 To: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager From: Mark A. Steuer, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer By: Jerry A. Dyer, Senior Civil Engineer Shelley Hayes, Assistant Enginee~ P428 RANCHO C',UCAMONGA Subject: RELEASE OF FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND NO. 6369997, RETAINED IN LIEU OF MAINTENANCE GUARANTEE BOND, IN THE AMOUNT OF $4,647,187.00, FOR UPPER CUCAMONGA STORM DRAIN AND STREET WIDENING IMPROVEMENTS, PHASES I AND II PROJECT, CONTRACT NO. 07-006 RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council authorize the City Clerk to release Faithful Performance Bond No. 6369997, retained in lieu of Maintenance Guarantee Bond, in the amount of $4,647,187.00, for Upper Cucamonga Storm Drain and Street Widening Improvements, Phases I and II project, Contract No. 07-006. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The required one-year maintenance period has ended and the improvements remain free from defects in materials and workmanship. Contractor: H & H General Contractors, Inc. PO Box 90208 San Bernardino, CA 92427 Respectfully submitted, ~~~~. a uer Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer MAS/JAD/SH:Is Attachments P429 UPPER CUCAMONGA STORM DRAIN AND STREET ~PIDENING IMPROVEMENTS PHASE LAND 2 srr~ N uHl~l ~0~~ \~ ~MD O^ a O~L Q y W TRILL BL ~'~,. ^^U ~ °:y . ~~~~~ 1U= C ROW SRS O 6TH Si J~~ ~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA VICINITY MAP N STAFF REPORT ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT Date: June 3, 2009 To: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager From: Mark A. Steuer, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer By: Jerry A. Dyer, Senior Civil Enginee Shelley Hayes, Assistant Engineer{-~ P430 RANCHO cUCAMONGA Subject: RELEASE OF MAINTENANCE GUARANTEE BOND IN THE AMOUNT OF $38,235.77, FOR FISCAL YEAR 2007/2008 LOCAL STREET REHABILITATION SLURRY SEAL PROJECT, CONTRACT NO. 07-177 RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council authorize the City Clerk to release Maintenance Guarantee Bond in the amount of $38,235.77, for the Fiscal Year 2007/2008 Local Street Rehabilitation Slurry Seal project, Contract No. 07-177. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The required one-year maintenance period has ended and the improvements remain free from defects in materials and workmanship. Contractor: American Asphalt South, Inc. 14436 Santa Ana Ave Fontana, CA 92337 Respectfully submitted, Mark A. Steuer Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer MAS/JAD/SH:Is Attachments VICINITY MAP MAP-L (ADDITIVE. ) r ti MAP-K (ADD) .~ ~ b~AP-J • • ' aornv~xY.ro~ '' _~ ~ .. ~ ~ ~ ~~ 1 .. . MAP-A r .F, , ,, ,mm.K ~. ~` I ~ ~ Iii ~ f _~... _ ~ ~K ~~~ UPLAND MAP=E MAP-H MAP-I - MAP.-P (ADD. zsG~xno MAP-0 (ADD.) S?REEf FOR REHA6. (SLURRY SEAL TYPE IQ P431 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FY 2007/08 PAVEMENT REHABILITATION N SLURRY SEAL PROGRAM N.rs. P432 STAFF REPORT ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT RANCHO Date: June 3, 2009 (~UCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager From: Mark A. Steuer, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer By: Trina Valdez, Public Services Technician II Subject: ACCEPT IMPROVEMENTS, RELEASE THE FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND, ACCEPT A MAINTENANCE BOND AND FILE A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 16311 LOCATED ON 6TH STREET, GOLDEN OAK ROAD AND HELLMAN AVENUE, SUBMITTED BY CRESTWOOD CORPORATION RECOMMENDATION The required improvements for Tract 16311 have been completed in an acceptable manner, and it is recommended that the City Council accept said improvements, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bond and accept a Maintenance Bond. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS As a condition of approval of completion of Tract 16311, located on 6th Street, Golden Oak Road and Hellman Avenue, the applicant was required to complete improvements. The improvements have been completed and it is recommended that the City Council release the existing Faithful Performance Bond and accept the Maintenance Bond. Developer: 510 W. Citrus Edge Street, Glendora, CA 91740 Release: Faithful Performance Bond # 730334S (Bond No.) Accept: Maintenance Bond # 730334S (Bond No.) Respectfully submitted, _ ~-- rk: Steuer Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer MAS:TLV:alnv $968,100.00 $96,810.00 Attachment(s) I- N CITY OF ITEM: ~~(e'r f~-3~l RANCHO CUCAMONGA TITLE: ~/~~ N/ /~/~ P434 RESOLUTION NO. D /~ ~ ~~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 16311 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for Tract 16311 have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work is complete. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. MEMORANDUM CITY CLERKS OFFICE Date: June 3, 2009 To: Chairman and Members of the Redevelopment Agency President and Members of the Fire Board Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, City Manager From: Debra L. McKay, MMC Assistant City Clerk/Records Manager Subject: Approval of a Resolution Changing the Time of Closed Session RANCHO CUCAMONGA RECOMMENDATION It is recommended the Redevelopment Agency/Fire Board/City Council approve the attached Resolution changing the time of Closed Session to 5:00 p.m. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Currently, the Redevelopment Agency/Fire Board/City Council Closed Session starts at 5:30 p.m. A Resolution has been prepared changing the time to 5:00 p.m. in order to ensure the participation of all members. Respectfully submitted, r ~~ 1 De a L. McKay, MMC Assistant City Clerk/Records Manager P435 Attachment (as noted) P436 RESOLUTION NO. 09- JD~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DETERMINING THE DAYS, TIME AND PLACE OF REGULAR MEETINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby resolve as follows: SECTION 1: Regular Meetings of the Rancho Cucamonga City Council shall be held in the Council Chambers at the Civic Center complex located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California, on the first and third Wednesday of each month. Each such regular meeting, commencing with the meeting of May 20, 2009, shall commence at 5:00 p.m. in the Tapia Room on the upper level of the Civic Center for purposes of conducting an Executive Session only. The remainder of each such meeting shall commence and be conducted at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the Civic Center. SECTION 2: Said regular meeting shall continue to occur on the first and third Wednesday of each month in the Council Chambers as stated above. Please see the following page for formal adoption, certification and signatures P437 Resolution No. 09-"' Page 2 of 2 PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 3b day of June 2009. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: Donald J. Kurth, M.D., Mayor ATTEST: Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk I, JANICE C. REYNOLDS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a Regular Meeting of said City Council held on the 3rtl day of June 2009. Executed this 4`h day of June 2009, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk P438 STAFF REPORT - CITT iVfA:~_~1GER'S OFFICE RANCHO Date: June 3, 2009 C,UCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager From: Fabian Villenas, Principal Management Analyst Subject: Approval of Support for the Restorative Justice Center and the Cucamonga Valley Viticulture Conservancy's efforts to create a Community Garden in the City of Rancho Cucamonga RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council approve the request for the City of Rancho Cucamonga to support the Restorative Justice Center and the Cucamonga Valley Viticulture Conservancy's efforts to create a community garden in the City and direct staff to draft a support letter for the Mayor's signature. BACKGROUND The City of Rancho Cucamonga has been approached by the Restorative Justice Center and the Cucamonga Valley Viticulture Conservancy for support of their efforts to create a community garden in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. According to information submitted, these groups are proposing to develop a collaborative community project that will include four main components: 1) a wine and table grape vineyard; 2) a community garden in which fruits and vegetables will be grown for private consumption and public sale 3) farmers market and 4) healthy and sustainable educational efforts. The goal of their efforts is to create a community destination where citizens and community groups can be involved in growing, distributing, and enjoying locally grown produce as well renew and preserve the area's viticulture (vineyard) heritage. The proposed 15-acre site for the community garden is located directly behind the Foothill Crossings Shopping Center (Sears Grand) between Foothill Boulevard and Jack Benny Drive and is within an Edison Company easement. The group's goals include developing a site plan; securing partnerships; obtaining necessary supplies and equipment; and organizing a farmer's market. The concept of a community garden is consistent with the City's Healthy RC program, which was launched 18 months ago. The mission of Healthy RC is to inspire a lifestyle that embraces a healthy Mind, Body and Earth, through lifelong learning and enrichment, active and healthy living and environmental sustainability. The City's support for the Restorative Justice Center and the Cucamonga Valley Viticulture Conservancy's efforts to create a community garden would specifically entail providing a letter of support from the City that would assist in their efforts to obtain grant funding and other assistance. This request does not include any sort of financial support from the City. P439 APPROVAL OF SUPPORT FOR THE RESTORATIVE JUSTICE CENTER AND THF., CUCAMONGA VALLEY PAGE 2 \'I1'ICULTURE CONSP-.RVANCY'S EFFOR'T'S 'f0 CREATE A COMMUNITY GARDL'N IN "PFIE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA JUNE 3, 3009 It is recommended that the City Council approve the City's support of the aforementioned group's efforts to create a community garden and direct staff to draft a support letter for the Mayor's signature when requested by the groups. Respectfully Submitted, ~~-~-_~~ Fabian A. Villenas, Principal Management Analyst City Manager's Office STAFF REPORT ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT Date: June 3, 2009 To: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager From: Mark Steuer, Director Engineering Services/City Engineer By: Jon Gillespie, Traffic Engineer P440 RANCHO cUCAMONGA Subject: APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION AND A PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT NO. F58 TO ADMINISTERING AGENCY-STATE AGREEMENT FOR STATE FUNDED PROJECTS NO. 00229S BETWEEN THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA AND THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FOR THE REPLACEMENT OF TRAFFIC SIGNAL CONTROLLERS AND CABINETS AT 20 LOCATIONS ON FOOTHILL BOULEVARD. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council approve a resolution and a Program Supplement No. F58 to Administering Agency-State Agreement for State Funded Projects No. 00229S between the State of California and the City of Rancho Cucamonga for the replacement of traffic signal controllers and cabinets at 20 locations on Foothill Boulevard. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS On August 28, 2008, the California Transportation Commission (CTC) awarded a Traffic Light Synchronization Program (TLSP) Grant to the City of Rancho Cucamonga in the amount of $225,000 for the replacement of traffic signal controllers and cabinets at 20 intersections on Foothill Boulevard. On July 10, 2008, City staff signed a Base Line Agreement between the California Department of Transportation and the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The California Department of Transportation is now asking that the City enter into Cooperative Agreement titled: "Program Supplement Agreement No. F58 to Administering Agency-State Agreement for State Funded Projects No. 00229S". The California Department of Transportation is also asking for a resolution authorizing a City official to execute this agreement. Staff recommends that the City Council authorize the City Engineer to sign this agreement, and any amendments. The resolution and amendment were reviewed and are acceptable to the City Attorney. Respectfully submitted, `. a uer Director Engineering Services/City Engineer MAS/JG:rlc Attachments: Exhibit "A", Vicinity Map P441 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FOOTHILL BOULEVARD TRAFFIC CABINET REPLACEMENT FROM SAN BERNARDINO ROAD TO ETIWANDA AVENUE ~nxx opt C/TY GF rONIAN/~. SAN ":RIvARDlNO COJPJ i Y 4 I: VICINITY MAP N.T.S. r ' mim as ~ ^weoRr CUC,4M0 JG,4 ~~ ~- ~yV.. L_1~IDCL__ _ " ~_ ~ a ~~ i ~ / ~ / i ~ /I ~, ...~ °°` g $ _ , B .s t P442 RESOLUTION NO. ©~I- ~ ~ 7 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT NO. F58 TO ADMINISTERING AGENCY-STATE AGREEMENT FOR STATE FUNDED PROJECTS N0.00229S BETWEEN THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA AND THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has for its consideration a Program Supplement No. F58 to Administering Agency-State Agreement for State Funded Projects No. 00229S between the State of California and the City of Rancho Cucamonga for the replacement of traffic signal controllers and cabinets at 20 locations on Foothill Boulevard; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that the project will benefit traffic circulation in the City of Rancho Cucamonga; and WHEREAS, a Cooperative Agreement needs to be executed between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the State of California in order for the project to be constructed; and WHEREAS, the City Council wishes to delegate authorization to execute this Cooperative Agreement and any amendments thereto to the City Engineer. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, hereby resolves that said Cooperative Agreement be hereby approved, and the City Engineer is hereby authorized to sign said Cooperative Agreement on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. P443 PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 3rd day of June, 2009. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: Donald J. Kurth, M.D., Mayor ATTEST: Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk I, JANICE C. REYNOLDS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a Regular Meeting of said City Council held on the 3rd day of June, 2009. Executed this 3rd day of June, 2009, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. C. Reynolds, City Clerk P444 STAFF REPORT RANQ~O QJCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Date: June 3, 2009 To: President and Members of the Board of Directors Jack Lam, A.I.C.P., City Manager From: Peter M. Bryan, Fire Chief By: Janet Walker, Management Analyst II RANCHO C,UCAb40NGA Subject: MELLO-RODS COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1 (CFD 85-1) SPECIAL TAX LEVY FOR FISCAL YEAR 2009/10 RECOMMENDATION Consideration of approval of first reading of an ordinance continuing the Annual Special Tax Rates for Fiscal Year 2009/10 in Mello-Roos Community Facilities District No. 85-1. BACKGROUND Each year, in order to levy the authorized special tax within CFD No. 85-1, the Board adopts an ordinance setting the special tax rates in the amount necessary to meet budgetary requirements on a fiscal year basis. The special tax is necessary to provide the required operation and maintenance revenue specific to ongoing fire protection and life safety services within the CFD. This voter approved Mello-Roos CFD and associated special tax was first initiated in FY 1986/87. ANALYSIS As required by the specific language of CFD 85-1, the proposed special tax rate for fiscal year 2009/10 has been adjusted in accordance with the March to March Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange Co. Consumer Price Index (CPI). This adjustment reflects an annual decrease of $1.46 (or approximately 12 cents per month) per dwelling unit below last year's special tax levy. The reduction for commercial/industrial properties is $1.46 per acre for developed properties with a slight decrease to the cost per square foot of building area. In total the approximate change in the proposed special tax is -1.0%. The following table reflects the annual special tax rates for each year since the formation of CFD No. 85-1 and the proposed special tax lery for fiscal year 2009/10. FISCAL RESIDENTIAL YEAR DWELLINGS COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES INDUSTRIAL PROPERTIES 1986/87 $ 64.00 per DU $ 64.00 per AC+.04 SF $ 64.00 per AC+.05 SF 1987/88 $ 43.75 per DU $ 43.75 per AC+.04 SF $ 43.75 per AC+.05 SF 1988/89 $ 43.75 per DU $ 43.75 per AC+.04 SF $ 43.75 per AC+.05 SF 1989/90 $ 49.75 per DU $ 49.75 per AC+.042 SF $ 49.75 per AC+.052 SF P445 MELLO-ROOS COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1 (CFD 85-1) SPECIALTAX LEVY FOR FISCAL YEAR 2009/10 JUNE 3. 20097 FISCAL RESIDENTIAL YEAR DWELLINGS 1990/91 1991 /92 1992/93 1993/94 1994/95 1995/96 1996/97 1997/98 1998/99 1999/00 2000/01 2001 /02 2002/03 2003/04 2004/05 2005/06 2006/07 2007/08 2008/09 $ 51.75 per DU $ 91.00 per DU $ 95.35 per DU $ 98.69 per DU $100.66 per DU $102.17 per DU $103.91 per DU $105.57 per DU $106.84 per DU $109.19 per DU $112.90 per DU $116.50 per DU $119.76 per DU $124.43 per DU $126.79 per DU $131.86 per DU $138.06 per DU $143.31 per DU $148.04 per DU Proposed 2009/10 $146.56 per DU COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES $ 51.75 per AC+.044 SF $ 91.00 per AC+.048 SF $ 95.35 per AC+.051 SF $ 98.69 per AC+.053 SF $100.66 per AC+.054 SF $102.17 per AC+.055 SF $103.91 per AC+.056 SF $105.57 per AC+.057 SF $106.84 per AC+.058 SF $109.19 per AC+.059 SF $112.90 per AC+.061 SF $116.50 per AC+.063 SF $119.76 per AC+.065 SF $124.43 per AC+.068 SF $126.79 per AC+.069 SF $131.86 per AC+.072 SF $138.06 per AC+.075 SF $143.31 per AC + .078 SF $148.04 per AC + .080 SF $146.56 per AC + .079 SF INDUSTRIAL PROPERTIES PAGE 2 $ 51.75 per AC+.054 SF $ 91.00 per AC+.061 SF $ 95.35 per AC+.064 SF $ 98.69 per AC+.066 SF $100.66 per AC+.067 SF $102.17 per AC+.068 SF $103.91 per AC+.069 SF $105.57 per AC+.070 SF $106.84 per AC+.071 SF $109.19 per AC+.073 SF $112.90 per AC+.076 SF $116.50 per AC+.078 SF $119.76 per AC+.08 SF $124.43 per AC+.083 SF $126.79 per AC+.085 SF $131.86 per AC+.088 SF $138.06 per AC+.092 SF $143.31 per AC + .095 SF $148.04 per AC + .098 SF $146.56 per AC + .097 SF Exhibit "A" of the proposed and attached ordinance sets forth the rate and method of apportionment for the special tax to be levied in Fiscal Year 2009/10. Notice regarding the proposed special tax and public hearing has been published in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin. During the budget workshop scheduled far June, the proposed CFD No. 85-1 budget will be reviewed by the Board. ly Peter M. ryan /~V Fire Chief Attachment P446 ORDINANCE NO. FD S18 AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE LEVY OF THE SPECIAL TAX IN MELLO-RODS COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2009/10 WHEREAS, a special election was held in the Mello-Roos Community Facilities District No. 85-1 (the "Community Facilities District") of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District (formerly Foothill Fire Protection District, the "District") on Tuesday, December 10, 1985; and WHEREAS, as a result of the election, more than two-thirds (2/3) of the qualified electors voted in favor of a proposition to authorize the levy of a special tax for fire suppression services and facilities, to establish an appropriations limit and to annually adjust the special tax and appropriations limit based upon changes in cost of living and changes in population; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 53340 of the Government Code, this Board of Directors is authorized, by ordinance, to annually levy a special tax at the rate and apportion the special tax in the manner specified in the resolution adopted pursuant to Article 2 (commencing with Section 53318 of the Government Code), except that this Board of Directors may levy the special tax at a lower rate; and WHEREAS, this Board of Directors desires to levy a special tax in the Community Facilities District for the fiscal year 2009/10. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby ordained as follows: SECTION 1. Levy of Special Tax. By the passage of this ordinance, this Board of Directors hereby authorizes and directs the levy of a special tax in the Community Facilities District for the fiscal year 2009/10 at the rate and apportioned in the manner set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof. SECTION 2. Exempt Properties. This Board of Directors hereby determines that properties or entities of the State, Federal or other local governments shall be exempt from such special tax. SECTION 3. Use of Special Tax. This Board of Directors hereby finds and determines that the special tax shall be used to pay, in whole or in part, the costs and expenses for facilities and services specified as follows: (a) The construction, acquisition, expansion and/or rehabilitation of public facilities, within or for the benefit of, the Community Facilities District generally described as follows: Ordinance No. FD Page 2 of 4 Fire protection and suppression facilities and appurtenances, including; equipment, real property and other tangible property with an estimated useful life of five years or longer. (b) The services to be provided within the Community Facilities District are generally described as follows: The performance by employees of functions, operations and maintenance and repair activities in order to provide fire protection within the Community Facilities District. (c) The repayment of advances and loans. The special tax shall be used solely for the purposes specified above and for no other purpose. SECTION 4. Collection of Special Tax. The special tax shall be collected in the same manner as ordinary ad valorem property taxes are collected and shall be subject to the same penalties and the same procedure and sale in case of delinquency as provided for ad valorem taxes. SECTION 5. Filing of Ordinance. The Secretary is hereby authorized and directed to file a certified copy of this ordinance with the Tax Collector of the County of San Bernardino as may be appropriate. SECTION 6. Publication of Ordinance. The Secretary is hereby authorized and directed to publish this ordinance once in a newspaper of general circulation and to maintain the ordinance for public inspection and distribution. SECTION 7. Publication: Effective Date. This ordinance was read on the day of June, 2009, and was adopted on the day of 2009 and shall take effect and be in force upon its adoption. P447 P448 Ordinance No. FD Page 3 PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this _ day of , 2009. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: Donald J. Kurth, M.D., President ATTEST: Janice C. Reynolds, Secretary I, JANICE C. REYNOLDS, SECRETARY of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance was introduced at a Regular Meeting of the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District held on the _ day of June 2009 and was passed at a Regular Meeting of the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District held on the day of 2009, at Rancho Cucamonga, California Executed this day of 2009, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Janice C. Reynolds, Secretary Ordinance No. FD Page 4 of 4 EXHIBIT "A" SPECIAL TAX FOR FISCAL YEAR 2009/10 IN MELLO-ROOS COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1 RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT ANNUAL STRUCTURES SPECIAL TAX Residential ($146.56) per DU Multi-family 2 DU: 1.75 ($146. 56) 3 DU: 2.25 ($146. 56) 4 DU: 2.65 ($146. 56) 5-14 DU: 2.65 ($146. 56) + {.35 (TU - 4) ($146 .56)} 15-30 DU: 6.15 ($146. 56) + {.30 (TU - 14) ($146 .56)} 31-80 DU: 10.65 ($146. 56) + {.25 (TU - 30) ($146. 56)} 81 - up DU: 23.15 ($146. 56) + {.20 (TU - 80) ($146. 56)} Commercial ($146.56) per acre + $.079 per SF Industrial ($146.56) per acre + $.097 per SF NOTE: DU =Dwelling Unit TU =Total Units SF =Square Foot Reduction Commercial and industrial structures shall be granted a .01 cent reduction in the Special Tax for the installation of complete sprinkler systems. In addition, multi-floor commercial and industrial structures shall also be granted a .01 cent reduction (not cumulative) in Special Tax for each separate floor above or below the main ground floor of the structure. P449 ~~o~~ CONTINUANCE OF PUBLIC HEARING At its regular meeting held on May 20, 2009, the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District continued the following item to its meeting to be held on June 3, 2009. N1. ORDINANCE NO. FD 48 (first reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE LEW OF THE SPECIAL TAX IN MELLO- ROOS COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2009/10 N2. RESOLUTION NO. FD-019 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING THE ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-1 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2009/10 The meeting to be held at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers at the Rancho Cucamonga City Hall, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Said continuance was passed by the following vote: Ayes: Kurth, Michael, Gutierrez, Spagnolo and Williams Noes: None Absent: None Abstain: None Mav 21.2009 ` ~~ Date Kat ryn colt, CMC Assistant City Clerk P450 STAFF REPORT RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Date: June 3, 2009 To: President and Members of the Board of Directors Jack Lam, A.I.C. P., City Manager From: Peter M. Bryan, Fire Chief By: Janet Walker, Management Analyst II RANCHO C,UCAMONGA Subject: MELLO-ROOS COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-1 (CFD NO. 88-1) SPECIAL TAX LEVY FOR FISCAL YEAR 2009/10 RECOMMENDATION Consideration of approval of a resolution continuing the annual special tax rate to be levied in Mello-Roos Community Facilities District No. 88-1 for Fiscal Year 2009/10. BACKGROUND On April 4, 1989, the qualified voters approved the formation of Mello-Roos Community Facilities District No. 88-1 and authorized the District to annually levy a special tax to provide for fire protection services within northeast Etiwanda. On May 19, 1989, the Board adopted an ordinance authorizing the annual levy of a special tax in CFD 88-1. The Ordinance authorizes the District, by resolution, to annually levy the special tax for purposes of land acquisition, fire station construction, purchase of equipment and operations and maintenance costs for fire protection services within CFD 88-1. This voter approved CFD and associated special tax was first initiated in Fiscal Year 1989/90. Fiscal Year 2009/10 is the twenty first (21) consecutive year the District has levied a special tax to provide required revenues for capital improvements (land, fire station facility, equipment) and fire protection services (personnel, operations and maintenance (O&M)) within this CFD. Accordingly, the Fiscal Year 2009/10 budget includes the appropriate amounts fully burdened personnel costs associated with existing memorandums of understanding between the District and its bargaining units as well as all related operations and maintenance costs, and capital improvements. ANALYSIS As a result of the economic downturn, for Fiscal Year 2009/10, staff is proposing that the rates remain at the same level as FY2008/09 tax levy for all developed property. The proposed fiscal year 2009/10 special tax levy will cover only a portion of the ongoing personnel and fire station O&M costs within the CFD; all remaining costs are covered by the Fire General Fund. The resolution submitted for your approval establishes the recommended annual special tax to be levied in Fiscal Year 2009/10, as identified in Exhibit "A". The maximum special tax which could be levied is illustrated in Exhibit "B" of the resolution, utilizing the State of California, Department of Finance methodology for adjusting appropriations limits for State and Local Governments for adjusting the maximum special tax rate that could be levied. The recommended special tax levy P451 MELLO-ROOS COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-1 JUNE 3, 2009 PAGE 2 remains at less than half the special tax which could be levied, with the exception of the vacant land rate. During the budget workshop scheduled in June, the proposed CFD budget will be reviewed. Notice regarding the proposed special tax for FY 2009/10 and public hearing has been published in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin. Res ectfully submitted, Peter M. ryan Fire Chief Attachment P452 RESOLUTION NO. FD 09-D/~ A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING THE ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-1 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2009/10 WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, California, (formerly Foothill Fire Protection District, hereinafter referred to as the "legislative body"), has initiated proceedings, held a public hearing, conducted an election and received a favorable vote from the qualified electors relating to the levy of a special tax in a community facilities district, all as authorized pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982," being Chapter 2.5, Part 1, Division 2, Title 5 of the Government Code of the State of California. This community facilities district shall hereinafter be referred to as COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-1 (hereinafter referred to as the "District"); and WHEREAS, this legislative body, by ordinance, as authorized by Section 53340 of the Government Code of the State of California, has authorized the levy of a special tax to pay for costs and expenses related to said community facilities district, and this legislative body is desirous to establish the specific rate of the special tax to be collected for the next fiscal year and to adjust the maximum special tax authorization to be levied. NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District does hereby resolve, determine and order as follows: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct SECTION 2: That the specific rate and amount of the special tax to be collected to pay for the costs and expenses for the next fiscal year (2009/10) for the referenced District is hereby determined and established as set forth in the attached, referenced and incorporated Exhibit "A". SECTION 3: That the rate as set forth above does not exceed the amount as previously authorized by ordinance of this legislative body, and is not in excess of that as previously approved by the qualified electors of the District. SECTION 4: That the proceeds of the special tax shall be used to pay, in whole or in part, the costs of the following, in the following order of priority: Resolution No. FD 09- Page 2 of 5 A. Payment of principal and interest on any outstanding authorized bonded indebtedness, if any; B. Necessary replenishment of bond reserve funds or other reserve funds, including sinking funds; C. Payment of costs and expenses of authorized public facilities and public services, including the administration of the special tax levy; D. Repayment of advances and loans, if appropriate. The proceeds of the special taxes shall be used as set forth above, and shall not be used for any other purpose. SECTION 5: That the maximum authorized special tax rates for all developed properties are hereby adjusted pursuant to Ordinance No. 17. The maximum authorized special tax rates are set forth in the attached, referenced and incorporated Exhibit "B". SECTION 6: The special tax shall be collected in the same manner as ordinary ad valorem property taxes are collected, and shall be subject to the same penalties and same procedure and sale in cases of any delinquency for ad valorem taxes, and the Tax Collector is hereby authorized to deduct reasonable administrative costs incurred in collecting any said special tax. SECTION 7: All monies above collected shall be paid into the Community Facilities District funds, including any bond fund and reserve fund. SECTION 8: The Auditor of the County is hereby directed to enter in the next County assessment roll on which taxes will become due, opposite each lot or parcel of land affected in a space marked "public improvements," "special tax" or by any other suitable designation, the installment of the special tax, and for the exact rate and amount of said tax reference is made to the attached Exhibit "A". SECTION 9: The County Auditor shall then, at the close of the tax collection period, promptly renderto the Agency a detailed report showing the amount and/or amounts of such special tax installments, interest, penalties and percentages so collected and from what property collected, and also provide a statement of any percentages retained for the expense of making any such collection. P453 Resolution No. FD 09- Page 3 of 5 PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this day of June, 2009. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: Donald J. Kurth, M.D., President ATTEST: Janice C. Reynolds, Secretary I, JANICE C. REYNOLDS, SECRETARY of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, at a regular meeting of said Board held on the_ day of June 2009. Executed this day of June 2009 at Rancho Cucamonga, California. P454 Janice C. Reynolds, Secretary Resolution No. FD 09- Page 4 of 5 EXHIBIT "A" RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-1 SPECIAL TAX LEVY FISCAL YEAR 2009/10 SPECIAL TAX LEVY TAXING CLASSIFICATION FISCAL YEAR 2009/10 1. DEVELOPED PROPERTY A. Residential Class I $447.49 (more than 3590 SF) B. Residential Class II $344.89 (3077 to 3589 SF) C. Residential Class III $274.43 (2564 to 3076 SF) D. Residential Class IV $239.82 (2308 to 2563 SF) E. Residential Class V $207.66 (2051 to 2307 SF) F. Residential Class VI $189.14 (1795 to 2050 SF) G. Residential Class VII $170.58 (less than 1795 SF) Commercial/Industrial Property $688.54 per acre or $0.061 per square foot or building area, whichever is greater. 2. APPROVED PROPERTY $200.00 per lot or parcel 3. VACANT PROPERTY $10.00 per acre P455 SF =Square Feet Resolution No. FD 09- Page 5 of 5 EXHIBIT "B" RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-1 MAXIMUM SPECIAL TAX RATES FISCAL YEAR 2009/10 DEVELOPED PROPERTY MAXIMUM SPECIAL TAX RATE TAXING CLASSIFICATION 1. DEVELOPED PROPERTY A. Residential Class I (more than 3590 SF) B. Residential Class II (3077 to 3589 SF) C. Residential Class III (2564 to 3076 SF) D. Residential Class IV (2308 to 2563 SF) E. Residential Class V (2051 to 2307 SF) F. Residential Class VI (1795 to 2050 SF) G. Residential Class VII (less than 1795 SF) H. Commercial/Industrial Property 2. APPROVED PROPERTY 3. VACANT PROPERTY FISCAL YEAR 2009/10 $964.40 $740.21 $590.71 $517.76 $443.06 $409.24 $370.08 $1,485.74 per acre or $0.1202 per square foot or building area, whichever is greater. $200.00 per lot or parcel $10.00 per acre SF =Square Feet NOTE: Escalation of maximum special rate. Calculation formula Fiscal Year 2009/10 Pop. Change `CPI 1.0016 X -1.00 = 0.00 P456 `CPI -California Per Capita Personal Income P457 STAFF REPORT ~ - } PL~I~tiING DEPART:~SE'.vT RANCHO C,,UCAMONGA Date: June 3, 2009 To: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager From: James R. Troyer, AICP, Planning Director By: Thomas Grahn, Associate Planner Subject: CONSIDERATION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT SUBSTANTIAL AMENDMENT AND FUNDING ALLOCATION TO THE 2008- 2009 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN - DRC2008-00217R -CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A review of the federally required substantial amendment to the currently approved Annual Action Plan, which includes the selection of CDBG-R projects, based on a new grant allocation of $275,195 funded through the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council authorize the staff to submit the federally required substantial amendment to the 2008-2009 Annual Action Plan to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development ("HUD") for their consideration. ANALYSIS: Title XII of Division A of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 ("Recovery Act") (Pub. L. 111-005, approved February 17, 2009) appropriates $1 billion to carry out the CDBG program under Title I of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974 (42 U.S.C. 5301, et, seq.)(the HCDA) on an expedited basis. These funds were distributed to grantees that received funding in Fiscal Year 2008 as Community Development Block Grant -Recovery ("CDBG-R") funding, a supplemental allocation to the City's 2008 regular CDBG allocation. The CDBG-R funding is a formula allocation based on 27 percent of the City's 2008 CDBG allocation. Based on this formula, Rancho Cucamonga will receive a direct allocation of $275,195 in CDBG-R funds. The CDBG-R allocation is to be treated as a Substantial Amendment to the City's 2008-2009 Annual Action Plan and must be utilized for programs or projects which meet the goals and objectives of the City's Consolidated Plan and the legislative intent of the Recovery Act. HUD strongly urges grantees to use CDBG-R funds for hard development costs associated with infrastructure activities that provide basic services to residents or activities that promote energy efficiency and conservation through rehabilitation or retrofitting of existing buildings. While the full range of CDBG activities is available to grantees, HUD strongly suggests that grantees incorporate consideration of the public perception of the intent of the Recovery Act P458 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT DRC2008-00217R - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA JUNE 3, 2009 Page 3 in identifying and selecting projects for CDBG-R funding. In consideration of these requirements, the City structured a program for the utilization of CDBG-R funds that will meet the goals of the CDBG program while at the same time provide permanent physical improvements for our community, provide employment opportunities, and meet the needs of the City's low- and moderate-income persons. The City is proposing to utilize CDBG-R funds for the following activities: 1. Calle Veiar Street Improvements: This activity includes both the design and construction of street improvements for Calle Vejar from Hellman Avenue to Avenida Leon and Avenida Leon from Arrow Route to 150 feet north of Calle Vejar. Street improvements will include: remove the existing pavement, construct new pavement over an aggregate base, install streetlights, curbs, gutters, sidewalks, ramps for disabled persons, and street trees. When completed, the project will facilitate better drainage of the street and right-of-way. The CDBG-R funds allocated to this activity are not sufficient to complete the street improvement project, but will be combined with regular CDBG funds, which were banked over several years, to allow for the completion of this necessary public improvement project. The City has banked $381,590 in regular CDBG funds that when combined with the proposed CDBG-R allocation will provide a total of $629,275 for the completion of this activity. Staff recommends funding this activity $247,685 in CDBG-R funds. 2. CDBG-R Administration: This activity will provide the administrative capacity to implement the CDBG-R funding. This includes administration of the CDBG-R program, preparation of the CDBG-R federal application, submittal of the CDBG-R Substantial Amendment, and CDBG-R performance reporting. Staff recommends funding this activity $27,510 in CDBG-R funds. The CDBG requirement that 70 percent of funds be allocated to activities that benefit low- and moderate-income persons will apply to CDBG-R funds. A grantee must ensure that 70 percent of its CDBG-R grant be expended for activities that beneft low- and moderate- income persons. Based on this requirement, 90 percent of the City's CDBG allocation will be allocated to the Calle Vejar Street Improvement activity, an activity that principally benefits persons of low- and moderate-income. Although the CDBG-R funds are considered additional CDBG grant funds, HUD modified or waived the typical application requirements and procedures so that grantees could quickly make the best use of their funding. Applications for use of CDBG-R funds are due to HUD by June 5, 2009. All CDBG-R grantees must expend their entire allocation of CDBG-R funds by September 30, 2012. Any funds not expended by September 30, 2012, will be recaptured by HUD and returned to the U. S. Treasury. HUD provided alternative administrative requirements to expedite the distribution of grant funds and to provide for expedited citizen participation for the CDBG-R substantial amendment. Grantees are required to provide no fewer than 7 days for citizen comment (rather than 30 days) for its CDBG-R substantial amendment. At the time of submission to HUD, each grantee will post its action plan amendment and any subsequent CDBG-R amendments on its official website along with a summary of citizen comments received P459 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT DRC2008-00217R - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA JUNE 3, 2009 Page 3 within the 7-day comment period. The information to be included in the 7-day comment period includes the attachments to this report. CORRESPONDENCE: Notice of the public hearing and proposed funding allocations was published in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin on Tuesday, May 26, 2009. Respectfully submitted, / ;~ Vim' Jams R. Troyer, AICP Planning Director JT:TG/Is Attachments: Exhibit A -CDBG-R Substantial Amendment Exhibit B -CDBG-R Activity Data Spreadsheet Exhibit C -Application for Federal Assistance SF-424 Exhibit D -CDBG-R Certifications P460 CDBG-R SUBSTANTIAL AMENDMENT Jurisdiction: City of Rancho Cucamonga CDBG-R Contact Person: Thomas Grahn Address: 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Jurisdiction Web Address: Telephone: (909) 477-2750 http://www.cityofrc.us/govt/documents/CDBG- Fax: (909) 477-2847 RSubstantialAmendment-Draff Email: tom.grahnC~citvofrc.us CDBG-R SUBSTANTIAL AMENDMENT TD THE 2008-2009 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN The City of Rancho Cucamonga received notification from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development ("HUD") that it will received $275,195 in federal Community Development Block Grant-Recovery ("CDBG-R") funds distributed under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 ("Recovery Act"). This additional entitlement allocation is to be treated as a substantial amendment to the City's 2008-2009 Annual Action Plan and must be utilized for programs or projects which meet the goals and objectives of the City's Consolidated Plan and the legislative intent of Recovery Act. The City has structured a program for the utilization of these funds that will both meet the goals of the program while at the same time provide permanent physical improvements for our community, provide employment opportunities, and meet the needs of the City's low- and moderate-income persons. The City will utilize the CDBG-R funds for two activities, the Calle Vejar Street Improvements and CDBG-R program administration. The CDBG-R funds proposed for the Calle Vejar Street Improvement project will be combined with regular CDBG funds, which were banked over several years, to allow for the completion of this necessary public improvement project. E X H I B I T A Draft CDBG-R Substantial Amendment -Page 1 RANCHO CUCAMONGA P461 ENSURING RESPONSIBLE SPENDING OF RECOVERY ACT FUNDS Funding available under the Recovery Act has clear purposes - to stimulate the economy through measures that modernize the Nation's infrastructure, improve energy efficiency, and expand educational opportunities and access to health care. HUD strongly urges grantees to use CDBG-R funds for hard development costs associated with infrastructure activities that provide basic services to residents or activities that promote energy efficiency and conservation through rehabilitation or retrofitting of existing buildings. While the full range of CDBG activities is available to grantees, HUD strongly suggests that grantees incorporate consideration of the public perception of the intent of the Recovery Act in identifying and selecting projects for CDBG-R funding. A. SPREADSHEET FOR REPORTING PROPOSED CDBG-R ACTIVITIES Grantees must provide information concerning CDBG-R assisted activities in an electronic spreadsheet provided by HUD. The information that must be reported in the spreadsheet includes activity name, activity description, CDBG-R dollar amount budgeted, eligibility category, national objective citation, additional Recovery Act funds for the activity received from other programs, and total activity budget. A copy of the completed spreadsheet is attached to this substantial amendment. Draft CDBG-R Substantial Amendment -Page 2 P462 B. CDBG-R (INFORMATION BY ACTIVITY) (1) Activitv Name: Calle Vejar Street Improvements (Activity 1328) (2) Activitv Narrative: This activity includes both the design and construction of street improvements for Calle Vejar from Hellman Avenue to Avenida Leon and Avenida Leon from Arrow Route to 150 feet north of Calle Vejar. Street improvements will include: removal of the existing pavement, construct new pavement over aggregate base, install streetlights, curbs, gutters, sidewalks, ramps for disabled, and street trees. When completed, the project will facilitate better drainage of the street and right-of-way. In selecting this project for CDBG-R funding, the City gave priority to those factors that meet the requirements of Title XII of Division A and Section 1602 of the Recovery Act. Specifically, that the City give priority to projects that can award contracts based on bids within 120 days from the date funds are made available to the recipient, and that when CDBG-R funds are being used for infrastructure investments, that recipients shall give preference to activities that can be started and completed expeditiously. Because this project will utilize both CDBG and CDBG-R funds, there are sufficient funds to allow staff the opportunity to begin designing the proposed improvements so that when the grant agreement for CDBG-R funds is signed, the City can start the proposed street improvements within 120 days. Additionally, because of the current condition of the street along Calle Vejar, the City is committed to starting and completing this street improvement project expeditiously. CDBG-R funds will also be used in a manner that maximizes job creation and economic benefit in relation to the CDBG-R funds obligated, as required by the Recovery Act, by: Preserving and creating jobs and promoting economic recovery; The project will reconstruct the street improvements consisting of A.C. pavement, curb and gutter, cross gutters, sidewalks, hardscape, driveways, and street lights. The sidewalk layout will connect existing neighborhoods north of the project site to the existing adjacent park to fill in missing segments. Sidewalks will not be installed in all areas because it will result in the loss of many large parkway trees. The project will create jobs for the construction industry, thus keeping contractors and others employed which will help sustain the economy and promote economic recovery. • Assisting those most impacted by the recession; Due to the slowdown in the housing market, the construction industry has declined substantially. More contractors are competing for limited amount of projects. This project will help the contractors stay in business and keep their workers employed. • Providing investment needed to increase economic efficiency; This project is an investment in the local construction labor workforce and material supply markets. It will all improve property values and property tax basis of value. • Investing in transportation, environmental protection, or other infrastructure that will provide long-term economic benefits; Draft CDBG-R Substantial Amendment -Page 3 P463 The new A.C. pavement and curb and gutter will improve the drainage and reduce the City's maintenance costs. It also provides long-term economic benefit to the neighborhoods by improving and sustaining the quality of life for residents of the neighborhoods. Sustaining neighborhood as desirable places to live results in stable environment for local businesses to thrive and upholds property values for the residents. • Minimizing or avoiding reductions in essential services; or The installation of street lights will improve safety and crime prevention and therefore should decrease future service calls. • Fostering energy independence. Street lighting and sidewalks will help promote increased pedestrian activities. Preservation of mature trees will help reduce the global carbon footprint. (3) Jobs Created: (Report the number of full- and part-time jobs estimated to be created and retained by the activity (including permanent, construction, and temporary jobs)). Approximately 25 jobs will be created including direct, indirect, and induced employment. (4) Additional Activity Information: (A description of how the activity will promote energy conservation, smart growth, green building technologies, or reduced pollution emissions, if applicable.) The new A.C. pavement utilized in the Calle Vejar Street Improvement project will contain up to 15 percent recycled asphalt. Recycling AC pavement reduces pollution emission by reducing the amount of energy to extract and process raw material and it also helps preserve available landfill space. (5) Responsible Organization: City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Contact: Tom Grahn, (909) 477-2750, tom.grahn@cityofrc.us (6) Total Budget: $247,685. (The budget for the CDBG-R Calle Vejar street improvement activity is 90 percent of the City's total CDBG-R allocation. CDBG-R requirements establish that the aggregate us of CDBG-R funds shall principally benefit persons of low and moderate income in a manner that ensures that at least 70 percent of the grant is expended for activities that benefit such persons over the live of the CDBG-R grant. Here, 90 percent of the City's CDBG-R funds are dedicated to an activity that principally benefits persons of low and moderate income.) Draft CDBG-R Substantial Amendment -Page 4 P464 (1) Activity Name: CDBG-R Administration (Activity 1228) (2) Activity Narrative: This includes administration of the CDBG-R program, preparation of the CDBG-R federal application, submittal of the CDBG-R Substantial Amendment, and CDBG-R performance reporting. (3) Jobs Created: Implementation of the CDBG-R Administrative activity will be conducted by existing City staff utilizing one existing staff member; no full- or part-time jobs will be created by this activity. (4) Additional Activity Information: This question is not applicable to the City's CDBG-R Administrative activity. (5) Responsible Organization: City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Contact: Tom Grahn, (909) 477-2750, tom.grahn@cityofrc.us (6) Total Budget: $27,510. (The budget for the CDBG-R Administration activity is 10 percent of the City's total CDBG-R allocation.) Drak CDBG-R Substantial Amendment -Page 5 P465 C. PUBLIC COMMENT Provide a summary of public comments received to the proposed CDBG-R Substantial Amendment. Note: A Proposed CDBG-R Substantial Amendment must be published via the usual methods and posted on the jurisdiction's website for no less than 7 calendar days for public comment. Response: The City of Rancho Cucamonga Draft CDBG-R Substantial Amendment was announced in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper on Tuesday, May 26, 2009, was posted on the City's website on Tuesday, May 26, 2009, and was scheduled for City Council consideration on Wednesday, June 3, 2009. All public comments regarding this proposed CDBG-R Substantial Amendment should be sent to Thomas Grahn, Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730. In addition comments may be sent via a-mail at tom.grahn@cityofrc.us or at (909) 477-2750. The deadline for receipt of public input is the June 3, 2009, City Council meeting. The Rancho Cucamonga City Council will hear and vote on the proposed CDBG-R Substantial Amendment at their regularly scheduled June 3, 2009 City Council meeting. In accordance with CDBG-R requirements, the draft CDBG-R Substantial Amendment was posted on the City's website on May 26, 2009 for a minimum of 7 days of public review prior to submittal of the final CDBG-R Substantial Amendment to HUD. Draft CDBG-R Substantial Amendment -Page 6 Gl t rc ~ v C7 vii m ,~ O ''' U p a U Q 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~+ "" ~ ~n o •~ ~ ~ ~ N LC> ~ ~ N Q CO o ~ ~ O N a O O /L/~~~ ~~y ~ W •y 1 ..1 O ~i O ~+ ~ ~ ~ Q: ~ .~ ' O~ Q ~r~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ Q "v 0. ~ O O i (~ ~i Q1 ~ ~ CJ O r •~ ~ ~ ~ Q ~ ~ m C/'i 69 N 69 C O ~ ~ O ~ ~a ~_ . _0 V y'+ fB Q "" ~ ~ zov O o Q ~~ ~ tl') J O L ~ ~ E ."" i C o ~ O Q O ~ ~ 0 w ~ ,lam ~ _ "" 0 0 CO ~.I ~ V N N p ~ O O CJ ~ ~ ~ O C O (Lf p Q1 - ~ Y ~ ~ IC O N O O E 0 0 ~ c~ U ~ O 'r` . ~ ~ E E~ `p> N O N ~ O N ~ ~ - ~ ~ ~ O C m . ~ p ca . i _ + i + O Q ~ ~ ~ a> +- Q ~ ca U C f~ O H O a L. ~ a U a~ O ~~ ca ~ •X o m N m a co ~ L ~ L O O~ O C~ a ~ ~ p C ~ ~ V ; `r y c~ N ~ ~ ~ N ~ N U C~ ~ O ~ ~ ~ ' ,~:, U O ~ a U L a O O> y 0 O ~ ,-. ~ a a ~ C O a ~ ~ ~ ~ U O 3 ~ ~ C O E w C _ _ _ O¢ O E C O a O ~ Q U U C ~ O O N ~ E ~ ~ _~ U O ~ O~ _~ C f~ ~ N> O O N ~~ a o c c a .- a ~ (ti E . E E o aa> > c `~ E ~~ m °' c c6 a~ ~ ~ ~ ~ z ~ ~~ c o o . ~ ~E , ~ , ~ O ~ y ~ v ~ O C7 .c ~ Q U ~ U Q E P466 a O r M 01 O O N N Q co 0 ~nn~~~ 1 6 OMB Number: 4040-OO~P467 Expiration Date: 01/31/2009 Application for Federal Assistance SF-424 Version 02 '1. Type of Submission: '2. Type of Application " If Revision, select appropriate letter(s) ^ Preapplication ®New ® Application ^ Continuation `Other (Specify) ^ Changed/Corrected Application ^ Revision 3. Date Received: 4. Applicant Identifier : 5a. Federal Entity Identifier: `Sb. Federal Award Identifier: State Use Only: 6. Date Received by State: 7. State Application Identifier: 8. APPLICANT INFORMATION: 'a. Legal Name: Ci[y of Rancho Cucamonga `b. Employer/Taxpayer Identification Number (EINlTIN): `c. Organizational DUNS: 95-3213002 007052970 d. Address: 'Street 1: 10500 Civic Center Drive Street 2: `City: Rancho Cucamonoa County: "State: CA Province: `Country: 'Zip /Postal Code 91730 e. Organizational Unit: Department Name: Division Name: City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department f. Name and contact information of person to be contacted on matters involving this application: Prefix: Mr. `First Name: Thomas Middle Name: 'Last Name: Grahn Suffix: Title: Associate Planner Organizational Affiliation: City of Rancho Cucamonga 'Telephone Number: 909.982.3423 Fax Number: 909.477.2847 `Email: tom.grahnCWCityofrc.us r~/t ~~!"1~T /'1 OMB Number: 4040-OOP4F)II Expiravon Date: 01/312009 Application for Federal Assistance SF-424 Version 02 `9. Type of Applicant 1: Select Applicant Type: C. City or Township Government Type of Applicant 2: Select Applicant Type: Type of Applicant 3: Select Applicant Type: *Other (Specify) `10 Name of Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development 11. Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number: 14.253 CFDA Title: Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Entitlement / Recovery Act Funded (CDBG-R) `12 Funding Opportunity Number: `Title: 13. Competition Identification Number: Title: 14. Areas Affected by Project (Cities, Counties, States, etc.): City wide program; Census Tract 21, Block Group 2 `15. Descriptive Title of Applicant's Project: CDBG-R Administration; Public Facility Improvements (Calle Vejar Street Improvements) OMB Number 4040-OOP4179 Expiration Date: 01/31/2009 Application for Federal Assistance SF-424 Version o2 16. Congressional Districts Of: 'a. Applicant: CA-026 'b. Program/Project: CA-026 17. Proposed Project: "a. Start Date: 06/05/2009 `b. End Date: 09/30/2012 18. Estimated Funding ($): `a. Federal $275,195 'b. Applicant 'c. State "d. Local `e. Other 'f. Program Income 'g. TOTAL $275,195 *19. Is Application Subject to Review By State Under Executive Order 12372 Process? ^ a. This application was made available to the State under the Executive Order 12372 Process for review on ^ b. Program is subject to E.O. 12372 but has not been selected by the State for review. ® c. Program is not covered by E. O. 12372 "20. Is the Applicant Delinquent On Any Federal Debt? (If "Yes", provide explanation.) ^ Yes ® No 21. 'ey signing this application, I certify (1) to the statements contained in the list of certifications" and (2) that the statements herein are true, complete and accurate to the best of my knowledge. I also provide the required assurances'" and agree to comply with any resulting terms if I accept an award. I am aware that any false, fictitious, or fraudulent statements or claims may subject me to criminal, civil, or administrative penalties. (U. S. Code, Title 218, Section 1001) ® "I AGREE "The list of certifications and assurances, or an Internet site where you may obtain this list, is contained in the announcement or agency specific instructions Authorized Representative: Prefix: Dr. 'First Name: Donald Middle Name: 'Last Name: Kurth Suffix; `Title: Mayor `Telephone Number: 909.477.2700 Fax Number: 909.477.2847 ' Email: `Signature of Authorized Representative: 'Date Signed: 06/03/2009 Authorized for Local Reproduction Standard Form 424 (Revised 10/2005) Prescribed by OMB Circulaz A-]02 P470 CDBG-R CERTIFICATIONS (1) Affirmatively furthering fair housing. The jurisdiction will affirmatively further fair housing, which means that it will conduct an analysis to identify impediments to fair housing choice within the jurisdiction, take appropriate actions to overcome the effects of any impediments identified through that analysis, and maintain records reflecting the analysis and actions in this regard. (2) Anti-displacement and relocation plan. The jurisdiction will comply with the acquisition and relocation requirements of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970, as amended (42 U.S.C. 4601), and implementing regulations at 49 CFR part 24; and it has in effect and is following a residential anti-displacement and relocation assistance plan required under section 104(d) of the housing and Community Development Act of 1974, as amended, in connection with any activity assisted with funding under CDBG-R. (3) Drug Free Workplace. The jurisdiction will or will continue to provide adrug-free workplace by: 1. Publishing a statement notifying employees that the unlawful manufacture, distribution, dispensing, possession, or use of a controlled substance is prohibited in the grantee's workplace and specifying the actions that will be taken against employees for violation of such prohibition; 2. Establishing an ongoing drug-free awareness program to inform employees about - (a) The dangers of drug abuse in the workplace; (b) The grantee's policy of maintaining adrug-free workplace; (c) Any available drug counseling, rehabilitation, and employee assistance programs; and (d) The penalties that may be imposed upon employees for drug abuse violations occurring in the workplace; 3. Making it a requirement that each employee to be engaged in the performance of the grant be given a copy of the statement required by paragraph 1; 4. Notifying the employee in the statement required by paragraph 1 that, as a condition of employment under the grant, the employee will - (a) Abide by the terms of the statement; and (b) Notify the employer in writing of his or her conviction for a violation of a criminal drug statute occurring in the workplace no later than five calendar days after such conviction; 5. Notifying the agency in writing, within ten (10) calendar days after receiving notice under subparagraph 4(b) from an employee or otherwise receiving actual notice of such conviction. Employers of convicted employees must provide notice, including position title, to every grant officer or other designee on whose grant activity the convicted employee was working, unless the Federal agency has designated a central point for the receipt of such notices. Notice shall include the identification number(s) of each affected grant; 6. Taking one of the following actions, within thirty (30) calendar days of receiving notice under subparagraph 4(b), with respect to any employee who is so convicted: E X H I B I T D Draft CDBG-R Substantial Amendment Certifications -Page 1 P471 (a) Taking appropriate personnel action against such an employee, up to and including termination, consistent with the requirements of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; or (b) Requiring such employee to participate satisfactorily in a drug abuse assistance or rehabilitation program approved for such purposes by a Federal, State, or local health, law enforcement, or other appropriate agency; 7. Making a good faith effort to continue to maintain adrug-free workplace through implementation of paragraphs 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6. (4) Anti-lobbying. To the best of the jurisdiction's knowledge and belief: 1. No Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid, by or on behalf of it, to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with the awarding of any Federal contract, the making of any Federal grant, the making of any Federal loan, the entering into of any cooperative agreement, and the extension, continuation, renewal, amendment, or modification of any Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement; 2. If any funds other than Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with this Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement, it will complete and submit Standard Form-LLL, "Disclosure Form to Report Lobbying," in accordance with its instructions; and 3. It will require that the language of paragraph 1 and 2 of this anti-lobbying certification be included in the award documents for all subawards at all tiers (including subcontracts, subgrants, and contracts under grants, loans, and cooperative agreements) and that all subrecipients shall certify and disclose accordingly. (5) Authority of Jurisdiction. The jurisdiction possesses the legal authority to carry out the programs for which it is seeking funding, in accordance with applicable HUD regulations and other program requirements. (6) Consistency with Plan. The housing activities to be undertaken with CDBG-R funds are consistent with its consolidated plan. (7) Section 3. The jurisdiction will comply with section 3 of the Housing and Urban Development Act of 1968 (12 U.S.C. 1701 u), and implementing regulations at 24 CFR part 135. (8) Community development plan. The jurisdiction certifies that the consolidated housing and community development plan identifies housing and community development needs and specifies both short-term and long-term community development objectives that have been developed in accordance with the primary objective of the statute authorizing the CDBG program. (9) Following a plan. The jurisdiction is following a current consolidated plan that has been approved by HUD. (10) Use of funds. The jurisdiction has developed activities so as to give the maximum feasible priority to activities that will benefit low- and moderate-income families or aid in the Draft CDBG-R Substantial Amendment Certifications -Page 2 P472 prevention of slums or blight. Additional activities may be included that are designed to meet other community development needs having particular urgency because existing conditions pose a serious and immediate threat to the health or welfare of the community where other financial resources are not available to meet such needs. It has complied with the following criteria: 1. Maximum Feasible Priority. With respect to activities expected to be assisted with CDBG-R funds, it certifies that it has developed its Action Plan so as to give maximum feasible priority to activities which benefit low and moderate income families or aid in the prevention or elimination of slums or blight. The Action Plan may also include activities which the grantee certifies are designed to meet other community development needs having a particular urgency because existing conditions pose a serious and immediate threat to the health or welfare of the community, and other financial resources are not available); 2. Special Assessments. The jurisdiction will not attempt to recover any capital costs of public improvements assisted with CDBG-R funds by assessing any amount against properties owned and occupied by persons of low- and moderate-income, including any fee charged or assessment made as a condition of obtaining access to such public improvements. However, if CDBG-R funds are used to pay the proportion of a fee or assessment attributable to the capital costs of public improvements (assisted in part with CDBG-R funds) financed from other revenue sources, an assessment or charge may be made against the property with respect to the public improvements financed by a source other than CDBG-R funds. The jurisdiction will not attempt to recover any capital costs of public improvements assisted with CDBG-R funds, unless CDBG-R funds are used to pay the proportion of fee or assessment attributable to the capital costs of public improvements financed from other revenue sources. In this case, an assessment or charge may be made against the property with respect to the public improvements financed by a source other than CDBG-R funds. In addition, with respect to properties owned and occupied by moderate-income (but not low-income) families, an assessment or charge may be made against the property with respect to the public improvemehts financed by a source other than CDBG-R funds if the jurisdiction certifies that it lacks CDBG-R or CDBG funds to cover the assessment. (11) Excessive Force. The jurisdiction certifies that it has adopted and is enforcing: (1) a policy prohibiting the use of excessive force by law enforcement agencies within its jurisdiction against any individuals engaged in non-violent civil rights demonstrations; and (2) a policy of enforcing applicable State and local laws against physically barring entrance to or exit from a facility or location that is the subject of such non-violent civil rights demonstrations within its jurisdiction. (12) Compliance with anti-discrimination laws. The CDBG-R grant will be conducted and administered in conformity with title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. 2000d), the Fair Housing Act (42 U.S.C. 3601-3619), and implementing regulations. (13) Compliance with lead-based paint procedures. The activities concerning lead-based paint will comply with the requirements of part 35, subparts A, B, J, K, and R of this title. (14) Compliance with laws. The jurisdiction will comply with applicable laws Draft CDBG-R Substantial Amendment Certifications -Page 3 P473 (15) Compliance with ARRA. The jurisdiction will comply with Title XII of Division A of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009. (16) Project selection. The jurisdiction will select projects to be funded, by giving priority to projects that can award contracts based on bids within 120 days from the date the funds are made available to the recipient, and that will ensure maximum job creation and economic benefit. (17) Timeliness of infrastructure investments. When the jurisdiction uses CDBG-R funds for infrastructure investments, the grantee will give preference to quick-start and finish activities, including a goal to use at least 50 percent of the funds for activities within 120 days of enactment of the Recovery Act. (18) Buy American provision. The jurisdiction will ensure that all iron, steel and manufactured goods used in construction, alteration, repair, or maintenance of a public building or public work project assisted with CDBG-R funds under the Recovery Act must be produced in the United States unless the Secretary finds that: (1) the requirement is inconsistent with public interest; (2) those goods are not reasonably available or produced in sufficient quantity in the U.S.; (3) or the use of the goods will increase the project cost by more than 25 percent. (19) Appropriate use of funds for infrastructure investments. The Governor, mayor, or other chief executive, as appropriate certifies, that any infrastructure investments have received the full review and vetting required by law and that the chief executive accepts responsibility that the infrastructure investment is an appropriate use of taxpayer dollars. Alternatively, a grantee's chief elected official certifies that infrastructure investments will receive the full review and vetting required by law and that the chief executive accepts responsibility that the infrastructure investment is an appropriate use of taxpayer dollars. (20) 70% of CDBG-R for LMI. The aggregate use of CDBG-R funds shall principally benefit persons of low and moderate income in a manner that ensures that at least 70 percent of the grant is expended for activities that benefit such persons over the life of the CDBG-R grant. Signature/Authorized Official Title Date Draft CDBG-R Substantial Amendment Certifications -Page 4 a~ a a c~ m D V •.+ ~ ~ a ,~ ~ o m ~ Q ~ ~, ca ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ Q ~ ~, ~ o 0 ~ o . N '- _ ~ 00 ~ O ~ O ~ N ~ V 0 a C7 0 v .~ (~ a V ~ •a~ ~o ~~~ W ~~ I..L c~ m U F-- ~-: ~ ~ O ~ .~-~ _ N .~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a Q _~ '^~ V J > Q L ~~ ~~ .~ .~ •~ -v o Q = .~ O .-: U ~ ~ U ~i ~~ 0 2 `~ ~"'~ ~--+ Q .L Q I ~--+ 0 L .Q Q .~ O U Q ~--~ N .~ L.L L.L ~L Q ~~ a--r 0 N ._ O Q c~ m D U O •~--+ ~ 0 ~ O ti N N ~' ~ II ~~ ~ O .O ~ U U O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ m mU D o Uo 0 .~ O O ._ U O (6 m O U ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ >, ~ O U O O > ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ N ~ M ~~ ~~ ~Q ~~o ~~~ 4 C6 N N N O .~ O U O m U 1 N U O N N Q C6 O Q ca Q O O N ~--r U Q O O O N N .~ O N N t6 O .~ .~ Q N t~ ~_ ~U N N N O Q O U N Q O O ._ U N (6 U Ca N i ~ ~ ~ a~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ O O i ~~ ~ ~ ~' ~ ~ ~ ~. O ~ ~~ Q~ N ~ ~ N ~ ~ V N ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ j ~ ~ O cA O p ~ ~ ~ O ~ ~ ~ U .~ O ~ N ~ O C > O .. ~ ~ ~ O L 'z -a o ~° ~ U > ~ ~ ~~~F ~ ~ ~ ~ ~- c~_ ,~ a~ O~° ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~-~~ ~~n U .Q ~ a~ ~ c}a a~ c O ° t, m U ~ O ~ ~ ov to I- ~ .~ ti U ~ ~ I I ~ ~ ~--' ~ ~ +~ ~ N N ~ ~~X~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O U ~ ~ N ~ ~ O~ ~ .~ `O ; U ~ ~ (0 ~ ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ O c6 ~ L ~ ~ 1 . Q~ o ~ ~ L (0 O ~'~ v~ ~ o a~~~a~~ ~~ c6 ~~,~~~L- © O •., ~ o ,~ ca MMN //~~L 5C (~ Q L 'O W 1 G ~ V I ~ ~ ~ I I UZ c U ~ ~ LL V .~ ~ ~--+ . ~ ~ 0 ~ > }, > .- ~ ~ ~--+ U ~ o ~ ~ 0 O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ m 0 O ~ ~ ~ U ~ ~ _ . ~ ~ ~ ~- ~' ~ o ~ o ~; ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N +~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ >' ~ ~~ _ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ; ~ ~ •- O ~~_' ~ ~--r O ~ Q U •~ ~ U Q U ._ ~. 0 N O O ._ O O N .~ L.I_ m 0 U 0 U N ~O U _N N ca N ._ l .~ T C~ m D U O _~ ~--+ O a~ U ~/ .~ ~U _U ._ .> U c~ O U ~~ 0 L.f_ 1~; ~--+ ~- O .~ a~ ._ _~ .~ a~ ~ U c~ Q ._ N .~ U (6 I..L C~ m 0 U 0 Q O ~--+ N o ~ ~ o ~ ~ L ~--~ ~--+ ~ .~ a~ ~_ ~~ ~ ~ ca Q .~ ~ ~ m o U U W a`~i U L ~~-+ Q N L 'a--+ V J L .~ U L _~ a~ ~ L ~"~ •~ a--~ Q~ .~ ~ N N U L ~--+ 0 ~~ ~~ ~ ~ (~ ~ ~ ~ -~_ ~ U~ a~ ~ ~ `~ ~ ~MM (~ W '~ D >U O Ca ~--r ~--~ '; +r 0 ('~ Q •~ 0 U N O Q (~ ~ ~ O m ~ +-r 0 L U~ N I~ O N Q. o~ ~.~ M~ w w w N .~ ~F.~r N 0 U N V U .~ ~Q ~Q ~~ ~~o ~~~ N ~_ .> O L .~ .~ U L H O_ I ~ .~ ~` ~ Q ~.. ~ ~ ../ m ~~ U ~w }' N N ~, ~ ~~ N ; -, ~ ~ •~ ~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ Q ~ U ``~ > ~ ~ ~ .~ N ~ ~_ ~ ~ ~ -~ ~ O ~ v C~ .~ ~ N m ~ ~ ~ m ~ ~ ~ r~^ ~ ~~ 0 N N~ V U o a~ ~o ~o ~ N L o ~ ~ ~ c ~ o~ ~ ~ U 0 Q ~ Q = N .r..~ ~--+ 4~- ~ ~ ~ ~ a~ ~ > O ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ M (~ ~ /L~ V ~o +~ M L N ~ L ~--~ Q ~ /W'~ v+ Q ~~ ~~ ~m ~ Q ~U ~~ o m~ V U N _ O ~ Q (~ N 0 C O L' M ~ ~ 0 r /~ V J ~ ~ a~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a~ ~ ~ cn - - ~ ~ •~ cri ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ Q ~ N P474 STAFF REPORT - PLANNING DEPARTMENT RANCHO CUCAMONGA Date: June 3, 2009 To: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager From: James R. Troyer, AICP Planning Director By: Thomas Grahn, Associate Planner Subject: CONSIDERATION OF THE ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND CONSERVATION BLOCK GRANT FUNDING ALLOCATION FOR FISCAL YEAR 2009-2010 - DRC2009-00386 -CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A review of the federally required Energy Efficiency and Conservation Strategy, which includes the selection of EECBG projects, based on a new grant allocation of $1,597,700 funded through the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council authorize the staff to submit the federally required Energy Efficiency and Conservation Strategy to the U.S. Department of Energy ("DOE") for their consideration. ANALYSIS: The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 ("Recovery Act") (Pub. L. 111-005, approved February 17, 2009) appropriates funding to the DOE to issue/award formula-based grants under the Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grant ("EECBG") program. The DOE's authorization for this program is set forth in Title V, Subtitle E of the Energy Independence and Security Act ("EISA") of 2007 (Pub. L. 110-140, approved December 19, 2007). Based on DOE's formula, Rancho Cucamonga will receive a direct allocation of $1,597,700 in EECBG funds. The stated purposes of the EECBG program are to assist eligible entities in creating and implementing strategies to 1) reduce fossil fuel emissions in a manner that is environmentally sustainable and to the maximum extent practicable, maximizes benefits for local and regional communities, 2) reduce the total energy use of the eligible entities, and 3) improve energy efficiency in the building sector, the transportation sector, and other appropriate sectors. Cities may develop various initiatives and projects that address one or more of the purposes and each activity a city undertakes is not required to meet all of the stated purposes. The DOE encourages cities to develop a variety of different new and innovative approaches within the framework of the legislation and the guidance to serve the stated purposes. However, a city is required to use the funds in acost-effective manner that is of maximum benefit to the population of that city and in a manner that will yield continuous benefits over P475 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT DRC2009-00386 -CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA JUNE 3, 2009 Page 2 time in terms of energy and emission reductions. The City is proposing to utilize EECBG funds for the following activities: 1. Civic Center Phase I -Replacement of HVAC Controls: Replacement of the existing nineteen year old variable air volume boxes and HVAC control system with an advanced digital air controlled system for City Hall and the Police Department buildings. This program is the cornerstone of programs funded through the EECBG as improvements in energy controls and equipment and the corresponding reductions in energy costs demonstrate to the community the City's dedication to improvements energy efficiency. The City has a fiduciary responsibility to the citizens of our community, and recognizing the need for these improvements, and directing available resources to implement them, frees up City resources for other needed programs. Staff recommends funding this activity $1,230,980 in EECBG funds. 2. Home Improvement Program Energv Efficiency Revolving Loan: The City will establish a residential revolving loan program to encourage and fund energy saving projects for low-income homeowners. Rancho Cucamonga is an entitlement city receiving CDBG funding directly from HUD, and will utilize those funds to support the City's Home Improvement Program, which provides grants and no-interest loans to low-income eligible single family and mobile home owners. This EECBG funded program will provide additional revolving loan funds to support energy efficient retrofits to any homes assisted under the City's Home Improvement Program, thereby reducing the energy demand for low-income homeowners. Staff recommends funding this activity $100,000 in EECBG funds. 3. Energv Efficient Appliances Electrical and Mechanical Equipment Program: This program is two pronged as it 1) establishes a program to waive permit fees for the replacement and installation of energy efficient appliances and other mechanical and electrical equipment, and 2) provides for the training and Green Building certification of two Building and Safety Inspectors. This program improves energy efficiency by encouraging homeowners to replace inefficient appliances by waiving building permit fees, and provides two inspectors to eliminate 3rd party consultants for energy efficient appliances. Staff recommends funding this activity $57,000 in EECBG funds. 4. Energv Efficiency Coordinator: The City will partially fund an existing staff member to serve as the Energy Efficiency Coordinator to oversee the City's efforts to reduce energy consumption and conduct a public outreach campaign to promote energy efficiency. This position will work closely with the City's existing "Green Team" in the development of the Sustainability Action Plan. This position will also assist in the carbon base line testing for the City as required by AB 32, the California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006. Staff recommends funding this activity $49,950 in EECBG funds. 5. EECBG Administration: Administration of the EECBG grant and assistance in the implementation of identified activities. The successful implementation of the identified programs will result in reduced energy demand and improved energy efficiency. Staff recommends funding this activity $159,770 in EECBG funds. P476 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT DRC2009-00386 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA JUNE 3, 2009 Page 2 Cities are required to submit their Energy Efficiency by June 25, 2009. The period of performance for the months. In keeping with the agenda of the Reco~ immediate investment in the economy, cities are requ eighteen (18) months from the effective date of the obligated/committed within eighteen (18) months, the the funds and cancel the award. id Conservation Strategy to the DOE use of EECBG funds is thirty-six (36) ery Act, and supporting the goal of ed to obligate/commit all funds within award. In the event funds are not DOE reserves the right to deobligate The DOE established minimal administrative requirements to expedite the distribution of EECBG program funds. There are no established requirements for public notice, citizen input, or public hearings prior to the adoption of the City's Energy Efficiency and Conservation Strategy. To support the Recovery Act's goal of accountability and transparency in the use of these public funds, the City provided a ten (10) day public notice and advertised public hearing prior to the City Council's consideration of Rancho Cucamonga's Energy Efficiency and Conservation Strategy. CORRESPONDENCE: Notice of the public hearing and proposed funding allocations was published in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin on Friday, May 22, 2009. Respectfully submitted, IZ ~ d~ Jam R. Troyer, AICP Planning Director JT:TG/Is Attachments: Exhibit A -Grant Application Package • Application for Federal Assistance SF-424 • Project/Performance Site Locations • Disclosure of Lobbying Activities • Energy Efficiency and Conservation Strategy for Units of Local Government • EECBG Worksheets for each proposed activity • Environmental Questionaire for each proposed activity • Financial Management Assessment • SF-SAC Data Collection Form t P477 ..~ GF7ANTS.GOV" Grant Application Package Opportunity Title: Recovery Act 2 Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block ~ Offering Agency: National energy Technology Laboratory this electronic grants appticatiomis~illtendedrto ~- be usedlo apply forihe specific Federal funding CFDA Number: 81.128 ~ opportunity iefereneedhere. ;~- - CFDA Description: Energy Efficiency s Conservation Block Grant Program If the Federal funding opportunity tl5ted isq$t. Opportunity Number: pE-FDA-OOOOPI3 the~bpportynity7orvWhichybtc Wankfo-apply,".'. close ih{sappRcation~packagebyclidking~on the Competition ID: "Cancel"button at the top of this screen. Yob Opportunity Open Date: 03/26/2009 willsfhen need Yo locate the aorrect:Fede~ai>=~ ` Opportunity Close Date: funding opportunity, downloadnts application, . 06/25/2009 and~thena)#ply.; Agency Contact: Sue Miltenberger Contract Specialist E-mail: EECBG@netl.doe. gov Documents for Submission This opportunity is only open to organizations, applicants who are submitting grant applications on behalf of a company, state, local or tribal government, academia, or other type of organization. Application Filing Name: City of Rancho Cucamonga Move Form ro Mantlatory Documents for Submission Complete Pro]ect/Performance S1te Location(s) Application for Federal Assistance (SF-929) Other Attachments ~FOZm } Move Fonn to Delete Move Form to auDm,ssion Lst Move Form to Delete Activities (SF-LLL) Instrwctions O Enter a name for the application In the Application Filing Name Field. -This application can be completed in its entirety offline; however, you will need to login to the G2nls.gov wehsite during the submission process. -You can save your application at any time by clicking Ihe'Save' button at the top of your screen. -The "Save 8 SubmiC button will not be functional until all required data fields in the application are completed and you clicked on lhe'Check Package for Errors' button and cronfirmed all data required data fields are completed. O Open and complete all of the documents listed in the "Mandatory Documents" box. Complate the SF424 form Fln:t. - It is recommended that the SF424 form be the frst form completed for the application package. Data entered on the SF424 will poDUlate data felds in other mandatory and optional forms and the user cannot enter tlata in these fields. -The forms listed in the "Mandatory Documents" box end "Optional Documents" may be predefined forms, such as SF424, forms where a document needs to be attached, such as the Project Narrative or a combination of both. "Mantlatory Documents` are required for this application. "Optional Documents' can be used to provide additional support for this application or may be required for sDecibc types of grant activity. Reference the application package instuctions for more information regarding "Optional Documents". - To open and complete a form, simpty click on the Fonn's name to select the item and then click on the => button. This will move the document to the appropriate "Documents for Submission" box and the form will be automatically added to your application package. To view the form, scroll down the screen or select the form name antl click on the 'Open Fomi button to begin cempleang the required data fields. To remove a form/document from the'Documents for Submission' box, dick the document name to select it, and then click the c button. This will return the forMdocument to the "Mandatory Documents' or "Optional Documents' hoz. -All documents listed in the "Mandatory Documents' box must he moved to the "Mandatory Documents for Submission' hox. When you open a requiretl form, the felds which must be completed are highlighted in yellow with a red hordes. Optional felds and completed feltls are displayetl in white. If you enter invalid or incomplete information in a feld, you will receive an enor message. O Click the "Save 8 Submit" button to submit your application to Grants.gov. .M -Once you have properly completed all required ^`°^r>lion, save the completed appligtion by clicking on lhe'Save" button. -Click on the "Check Package for Enors" hutton xrect any enors or if none are found, save the aDDlication package. -The "Sava 8 Submit" button will became active ~ X H I B I T submission process. - Vou will be taken to the applicant login page to e screen instructions for submission. P478 OMB Number. 4040-0004 Expiration Date: 01131/2009 Application for Federal Assistance SF-424 Version 02 ' 1. Type of Submission: Preapplication Q Application Changed/Corrected Application ' 2. Type of Application: QX New ~ Continuation ~ Revision ' If Revisbn, select appropdate Isnar(s): 'other (Spaciry) ' 3. Date Received: 4. Applicant Identifier. Complerad M Grsnb.gov upon euemission. 5a. Fetlerel Entity Identfier: ' Sb. Federel Awartl Identfer. State Use Only: 6. Date Received by State: ~ 7. State Application Identifier: 8. APPLICANT INFORMATION: 'a. Legal Name: City of Rancho Cucamonga ' b. Employerlraxpayer Identification Number (EINRIN): ' c. Organizational DUNS: 95-3213002 007052970 d. Address: 'SVeett: 10500 Civic Center Drive Street2: ' City: Rancho Cucamonga County: 'State: CA: California Province: 'Country: USA: UNITED STATES ' Zip I Postal Code: 91730 e. Organizational Unit: Department Name: Division Name: Planning Department f. Name and contact Infonnatlon of person to be contacted on matters Involving this application: Prefx: Nr 'First Name: Thomas Middle Name: 'Last Name: Grahn Suffix: Title: ASaociate Planner Organizational Afrliation: City of Rancho Cucamonga 'Telephone Number. 909.977.2750 Faz Number: 909.477.2897 'Email: tom. grahn@cityofrc.us P479 OMB Number. 4040.0004 Expiration Date: 01/31!2009 Application for Federal Assistance SF-424 Version 02 9. Type of Applicant 1: Select Applicant Type: C: City or Township Government Type of AppBwnt 2: Select Applicant Type: Type of Applicant 3: Select Applicant Type: ' Other (specify): • 10. Name of Federal Agency: National Energy Technology Laboratory 11. Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number: 81.128 CFDA TiOe: Energy Efficiency d Conservation Block Grant Program ` 12. Funding Opportunity Number: DE-FOA-0000013 ' Title: Recovery Act ? Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grants ? Formula Grants 13. Competition Identification Number: Tine: 14. Areas Affected by Project (Clues, Counties, States, etc.): City of Rancho Cucamonga - City wide programs ' 15. Descriptive Tltie of Applicant's Project: Civic Center Replacement of HVAC Controls, Energy Efficient Appliances, Electrical, and Mechanical Equipment, Home Improvement Revolving Loan, Energy Efficiency Coordinator, EECBG Administration Attach supporting documents as specified in agency instructions. P480 OMB Number: 4040-0004 Expiration Date: 01131/2009 Application for Federal Assistance SF-424 Version 02 16. Congressional Districts Of: ' a. Applicant CA-026 ' b. Program/Project ~- ,_ y Attach an additional list of ProgramlProject Congressional Districts if needed. Add Attachment Dc,iete Attachment Vjew Affr~chmF,nr 17. Proposed Project: " a. Start Date: 10/23/2009 ' b. End Date: OS/22/2011 18. Estimated Funding ($): ` a. Federal 1, 5 9 7, 7 0 0. 0 0 ' b. Applicant 0 . 0 0 " c. State 0 . 0 D ' d. Local 0.00 " e. Other 0.00 ' f. Program Income 0.00 ' g. TOTAL 1, 597, 700.00 * 19. Is Application Subject to Review By State Under Executive Order 12372 Process? a. This application was made available to the State under the Executive Order 12372 Process for review on b. Program is subject to E.O. 12372 but has not been selected by the State for review. c. Program is not covered by E.O. 12372. " 20. Is the Applicant Delinquent On Any Federal Debt? (If "Yes", provide explanation.) Yes ~ No Explanatron 21. `By signing this application, I certify (1} to the statements contained in the list of certifications'"` and (2} that the statements herein are true, complete and accurate to the best of my knowledge. I also provide the required assurances'"' and agree to comply with any resulting terms if I accept an award. I am aware that any false, fictitious, or fraudulent statements or claims may subject me to criminal, civil, or administrative penalties. (U.S. Code, Title 218, Section 1001) X^ `" I AGREE " The list of certifications and assurances, or ar. Internet site where you may obtain this list, is contained in the announcement or agency specific instructions. Authorized Representative: Prefix: Dr. ~ `First Name: Donald Middle Name: ' Last Name: Kurth Suffix: ' Title: Mayor ' Telephone Number: g09. 477 , 2700 Fax Number: 90g. q77. 2897 `Email: tom.grahn@cityofrc.us Signature Of AUthOflzed Representative: Completed by Grants.gov upon submission. "Date Signed: Completed by Gran[s.gov upon submission. Authorized for Local Reproduction Standard Form 424 (Revised 1012005) Prescribed by OMB Circular A-102 P481 OMB Number: 4040-0004 Expiration Date: 01/31/2009 Application for Federal Assistance SF-424 Version 02 * Applicant Federal Debt Delinquency Explanation The following field should contain an explanation iF the Applicant organization is delinquent on any Federal Debt. Maximum number of characters that can be entered is 4,000. Try and avoid extra spaces and carriage returns to maximize the availability of space. P482 Other Attachment File(s) * Mandatory Other Attachment Filename: To add more "Other Attachment" attachments, please use the attachment buttons below. Add Optional Other Attachment Delete. Qptiona! OFher Attachment - View Optional Other Attachment Project/Performance Site Location(s) OMB Number: 4040-00f]483 Expiration Date: 08/31/2011 I am submitting an application as an individual, and not on behalf of a company, state, ProjecUPerformance Sfte Primary Location local or tribal govemment, academia, or other type of organization. Organization Name: City of Rancho Cucamcr.ga DUNS Number: 10070529700000 'Street/: X10500 Civic Center Drive Street2: PO Box 907 'City: Rancho Cucamonga County: San Bernardino 'State: CA: California Province: "Country: USA: UNITED STATES 'ZIP /Postal Code: 9172 9-0807 'Project) Performance Site Congressional District: CA-02 6 ProjecUPerformance Site Location 1 ~ I am submitting an application as an individual, and not on behalf of a company, state, local or tribal govemment, academia, or other type of organization. Organization Name: DUNS Number: 'Street/: Street2: ' City: County: ' State: Province: Country: USA: UNITED STATES ' ZIP /Postal Code: ' ProjecU Performance Site Congressional District: Project/Perrormance Site Location(s) oMB Number: aoao-oop483 Expiration Date: 08/31/2011 Q I am submitting an application as an individual, and not on behalf of a company, state, ProjectiPerformance Site Primary Location local or tribal govemment, academia, or other type of organization. Organization Name: City of Rancho Cucamonga DUNS Number: 0070529700000 Streett: X10500 Civic Center Drive Streett: IPO Box 907 'City: Rancho Cucamonga County: San Bernardino 'State: CA: California Province: "Country: USA: UNITED STATES "ZIP/Postal Code: 91"729-0807 "Project/Performance Site Congressional District: CA-026 ProJecUPertormanee Site Location 1 ~ I am submitting an application as an individual, and not on behalf of a company, state, local or tribal govemment, academia, or other type of organization. Organization Name: DUNS Number: ' Streett: Streett: `City: County: ' State: Province ' Country: USA: UNITED STATES `ZIP /Postal Code: `Project/ Performance Site Congressional District: P484 DISCLOSURE OF LOBBYING ACTIVITIES Approved by OMB CompleN thls form to disclose lobbying activities pursuant to 31 U.S.C.1352 0348-0046 1.' Type of Federal Action: 2.' Status of Federal Action: 3.' Report Type: a. mntrad II lI ~ a. bidbaedappGration ~ e. INtial tAhlg ~ b. grant ~I~y~~` ~ b. Wtial aware ~ D. matedal diar,pa c. inoperative apsemenl ~ c postawrd e. ban LJ e. ban guarantee ^ 1. ban Insurance 4. Name and Address of Reporting Entity: Prima ~SUbAwartlee Nano Cicy of Rancho Cucamonga Street 2 '$treetl 10500 Civlc Cenu) Drive •C~ry Poncho Cucamonga State CA: California 2,p 91]30 Congressional DisWcL tlknown: CA-026 5. If Reporting Entity in No.4 is Subawardee, Enter Name and Address of Prime: 6.' Federal DepartmenUAgency: 7.' Federal Program Name/Description: ppg Energy Efficiency 6 Conaervetlon Block Granr Program CFDA Number, JapPFCable: 81.128 8. Federal Action Number, if known: 9. Award Amount, if known: 1,59],]00.00 70. a. Name and Address of Lobbying Registrant: Prefix ~ • First Nome II Middle Name 1 Sulf¢ 'Last Nerve Street 1 Sheet 2 •Ciry Stab Zi0 b. Individual Performing Services (bmeing adtlreaa it amereN from Na. loo) Prefix ~ First Nama Mitltlle Name 'Last Name Suffix Sfreef 1 Street 2 'City State Zip InfortnaDOn requestae Nrouph thla form is eulhoezetl by Otle 31 U.S.C. sedion 1352. This tlistlasure of lobbying adivitiss Is a material representation d lad upon which t 1 • reliance was placatl Dy the bar above when Me trensadian was matle or entered into. This tlisdosure Is requiree pursuant to 31 U.S.C. 1352. Thb infonnallon will be reponetl to the Congress semiannually antl wl9 be evallable for public inspection. Any parson who fails b fAe the requiretl tlisdosure shall be cabled to a dWl penalty of not leas Dan 510,000 and oat more than f100,000 far each auto (allure. e Signature: ComPlecetl on auMniaai n [o Grants. gav o First Nems Middle Nama 'Name: Prefix ~ 'Lest Nams Sutra Title: Telephone No.: Date: Colleted on aubmiaai n to Granca.gav ANhoMd for LxM ftaPmauNen ata„aaN Farm • LLL (ftn. )i)) P485 Attachment D Energy Efficiency & Conservation Strategy for Units of Local Governments & Indian Tribes As detailed in Part 1 of this announcement, all applicants must submit an Energy Efficiency and Conservation Strategy (EEGs). Units of local government and Indian tribes have the option of submitting the EECS no later than 120 days after the effective date of the award or at the time of application. Units of local government and Indian tribes who chose to submit the EECS at the time of application shall use the format contained in Attachment D. This form should be saved in a file named °UIC-Strategy.pdf" and click on "Add Optional Other Attachment" to attach. Grantee: clry or Rancho curamonga Date: osioarzoos (mm/ddlyyyy) DiJNS #: ~os2s~o Program Contact Email: tom.grehnQcltyorrc.us Describe your government's proposed Energy Efficiency and Conservation Strategy. Provide a concise summary of your measureable goals and objectives, which should be aligned with the defined purposes and eligible activities of the EECBG Program. These goals and objectives should be comprehensive and maximize benefits community-wide. Provide a schedule or timetable for major milestones. If your government has an existing energy, climate, or other related strategy please describe how these strategies relate to each other. Rancho Cucamonga's strategy focuses on four EECBG eligible activities: 1) Financial Incentive Programs, 2) Energy Efficiency Retrofits, 3) Energy Efficiency and Conservation Programs for Buildings and Facilities, and 4) Building Codes and Inspections. The EECBG project activities will support the City's development of a Sustainability Action Plan, which will then support improvements in energy efficiency and the City's efforts to reduce electricity consumption and carbon emissions. The City's Energy EfFciency and Conservation Strategy includes the following goals: 1) Improve the City Hall HVAC energy efficiency by 15%, 2) Waive fees for 1,659 permits for homeowner energy retrofits, 3) Provide Green Building certification for two Building and Safety Inspectors, 4) Establish an energy efficiency revolving loan program for 10 income eligible homeowners, and 5) Establish an energy efficiency coordinator position. The Major Activities timetable, beginning at effective date of the funding award: Phase 1: Finalize the City Hall HVAC retrofit package. Publish bid and select contractors. Phase 2: Establish a revolving loan fund. Phase 3: Certify two Building and Safety Inspectors in Green Buildings, and establish a fee waiver program. Establish the Energy Efficiency Coordinator position. Phase 4: Begin program implementation within 90 days. Implement continuous monitoring, verification, and inspection. Phase 5: Obligate/commit all funds within 18 months and complete implementation of the EECBG program within 36 months. Additionally, the City of Rancho Cucamonga is developed a Sustainability Action Plan, which provides the foundation for the City to set a course towards achieving environmental sustainability. The proposed actions focus on policies and City operations initiatives that will facilitate the integration of a healthy mind, body, and Earth, in keeping with the Healthy RC initiative. Working with other stakeholders, the City will set an example by exploring, utilizing, and sharing best practices with the community. The City will meet all environmental mandates established by other regulatory agencies, and exceed them to the extent practical. Decisions will be based on sound fiscal practices. The Sustainability Action Plan has the goals of 1) Create an environment in the organization that expects the use of best practices, to the extent practical that promotes a healthy mind, body, and Earth, and 2) Lead by example in the community by linking personal health, organizational health, environmental protection, and Healthy RC policies. P486 2. Describe your government's proposed implementation plan for the use of EECBG Program funds to assist you in achieving the goals and objectives outlined in the strategy describe in question #1. Your description should include a summary of the activities submitted on your activity worksheets, and how each activity supports one or more of your strategy's goals/oltjedives. Rancho Cucamonga will provide a variety of retrofit measures and financial incentives to support energy efficiency programs. EECBG funding will supplement, not supplant existing City fiscal resources. The planned EECBG funded activities include: A. Civic Center Phase I -Replacement of HVAC Controls Replacement of the existing nineteen year old variable air volume boxes and HVAC control system with an advanced digital air controlled system for City Hall and the Police Department buildings. This program is the cornerstone of programs funded through the EECBG as improvements in energy controls and equipment and the corresponding reductions in energy costs demonstrate to the community the City's dedication to improvements energy efficiency. The City has a fiduciary responsibility to the citizens of our community, and recognizing the need for these improvements, and directing available resources to implement them, frees up City resources for other needed programs. B. Home Improvement Program Energy Efficiency Revolving Loan The City will establish a residential revolving loan program to encourage and fund energy saving projects for low-income homeowners. Rancho Cucamonga is an entitlement city receiving CDBG funding directly from HUD, and will utilize those funds to support the City's Home Improvement Program, which provides grants and no-interest loans to low-income eligible single family and mobile home owners. This EECBG funded program will provide additional revolving loan funds to support energy efficient retrofits to any homes assisted under the City's Home Improvement Program, thereby reducing the energy demand for low-income homeowners. C. Energy Efficient Appliances, Electrical, and Mechanical Equipment Program This program is two pronged as it 1) establish a program to waive permit fees for the replacement and installation of energy efficient appliances and other mechanical and electrical equipment, and 2) provide for the training and Green Building certification of two Building and Safety Inspectors. This program improves energy efficiency by encouraging homeowners to replace inefficient appliances by waiving building permit fees, and provides two inspectors to eliminate 3rd party consultants for energy efficient appliances. D. Energy Efficiency Coordinator The City will partially fund an existing staff member to serve as the Energy Efficiency Coordinator to oversee the City's efforts to reduce energy consumption and conduct a public outreach campaign to promote energy efficiency. This position will work closely with the City's existing "Green Team" in the development of the Sustainability Action Plan. This position will also assist in the carbon base line testing for the City as required by AB 32, the California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006. E. EECBG Administration Administration of the EECBG grant and assistance in the implementation of identified activities. The successful implementation of the identified programs will result in reduced energy demand and improved energy efficiency. P487 3. Describe how your government is taking into account the proposed implementation plans and activities for use of funds by adjacent units of local government that are grant recipients under the Program (response not mandatory for Indian Tribes). The implementation Rancho Cucamonga's EECS will involve coordination with neighboring communities (i.e., Fontana, Ontario, and Upland) and any applicable regional organizations to coordinate any applicable progrems. This coordination could include contractor outreach, sharing of monitoring procedures, and best practices in program marketing. We recognize the value of sharing applicable information among local governments and will utilize information gained to improve our community outreach and EECS program implementation. 4. Describe how your government will coordinate and share information with the state in which you are located regarding activities carried out with grant funds to maximize energy efficiency and conservation benefits (response not mandatory for Indian Tribes). The value of peer-to-peer information sharing among local governments, regional and state agencies, and local utility providers cannot be understated. Our EECBG program implementation must be overarching and reflective of the goals of the U.S. Department of Energy, California State Energy Program, and other regional and local energy plans to achieve meaningful results in energy savings. When possible we will enable local government personnel to participate in energy related workshops, participate in information sharing networks and databases, and generally contribute to the body of collective knowledge among local and state agency ofFcials in this area. Communicating our program results and best practices to the state will add to the collective body of knowledge towards improving comprehensive EECS program delivery, including the recognition of major and significant achievements in energy measures and savings. P488 5. Describe how this plan has been designed to ensure that it sustains benefits beyond the EECBG funding period. Energy conservation measures completed at City Hall, the Police Department, and throughout the community will continue throughout their lifetime to provide cost and energy savings and emission reductions to homes and civic buildings. Tracking will be done on a per project basis as the different projects have different outcome measures. The City Hall HVAC retrofit program will allow for the tracking of all associated energy (kWh) savings, energy cost savings, dollars spent and leveraged, building square footage, audits performed, and jobs created. The Green Building certification and fee waiver program will allow tracking of the number of inspections completed, the number of permits waived, and the dollars spent. Energy conservation resulting from implementation of the revolving loan program are to be managed by the Planning Department Home Improvement Program. Upon full repayment of the loan, the funds will be utilized for future energy efficiency and Sustainability improvements and will continue to be reinvested in the community in accordance with established procedures and requirements. The revolving loan fund will continue in perpetuity to provide financial support to local low-income residents to improve their homes energy efficiency. This program will allow tracking for number of units replaced, loans completed, dollars spent, audits performed, and jobs created. Energy conservation measures resulting from the Energy Efficiency Coordinator's efforts will result in improved energy efficiency and a reduction in greenhouse gasses as a result of implementation of the Sustainability Action Plan. 6. The President has made it clear that every taxpayer dollar spent on our economic recovery must be subject to unprecedented levels of transparency and accountability. Describe the auditing or monitoring procedures currently in place or that will be in place (by what date), to ensure funds are used for authorized purposes and every step is taken to prevent instances of fraud, waste, error, and abuse. The EECBG program will be managed by the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department, with building inspection oversight conducted by the Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Department, and with financial oversight conducted by the Rancho Cucamonga Administrative Services Department Finance Division. The Planning Department is responsible for developing and implementing the identified Sustainability programs and practices. The Planning Director, or his designee, is responsible for development and implementation of the Energy Efficiency and Conservation Strategy, and will annually provide program and metric results to the City Council and the City Manager. The Building Official, or his designee, is responsible for managing building inspections and confirming that energy efficient improvements were installed according to building code requirements. The Finance Director is responsible for conducting the program audit (conducted on an annual basis), and ensuring that program funds are spent according to program guidelines. EECBG Activity Worksheet Grantee: City of Rancho Cucamonga DUNS#: vo529~0 Program Contact First Name: Thomas Date: 06/03/2009 P489 Program Contact Email: tom.grahn®cieyofrc.us Last Name: Gratin Project Title: Civic Center Phase I - Replacement of HVAC Controls Activity: 1. Energy Efficiency and Conservation Strategy If Other: SeCtOr: Public Proposed Number of Jobs Created: If Other: Proposed Number of Jobs Retained: o_oo Proposed Energy Saved and/or Renewable Energy Generated: 15 to 208 Proposed GHG Emissions Reduced (C02 Equivalents): Proposed Funds Leveraged: $68,963.50 Proposed EECBG Budget: 1,23o,9a"o.oo Projected Costs Within Budget: Administration: Revolving Loans: Project Contact First Name: '~' Metric Activity: auilaing Retrofits If Other: Subgrants: Emall: ty. quaintance®cityofrc.ue Project Summary: (limit summary to space provided) Replacement of the existing nineteen year old variable air volume (VAV) boxes and HVAC control system with"the DDC VAV boxes and an advanced digital controlled syatem for City Hall and the Police Department. ", The-existing HVAC control system is obsolete and does not allow for real time monitoring and adjustment, nor does it provide many of the energy""savings of current technology. The existing system has exceeded"its maximum life expectancy and is showing"signs of equipment deterioration and failure. The existing zone temperature controls cannot be adjusted or diagnosed from a remote location and require extensive man power for calibration and maintenance. Temperature comfort is also compromised as a result"of the many floor plan changes which have mixed small spaces with large spaces within the same zones and inappropriate thermostat locations." Many city"employees and outside contractor man hours are spent maintaining and repairing the current FiVAC-syatem and user inconvenience and loss of productivity is rising as a result of frequent system failures. This activity will involve the installation of new digitally controlled VAV boxes and an advanced HVAC control system including a centralized control station and digital controls on all HVAC distribution and monitoring equipment. The syatem will provide muchgreater efficiency in controlling air conditioning-and heating comfort as well as a variety `of ""heating and cooling strategies which can be easily modified from the central station or off-site using web based access. Future incorporation of the lighting controls at all other City facilities will also be possible with this advanced system. Based on recent studies, an upgraded and highly efficient HVAC mechanical and electrical system can increase energy efficiency by 158 to 208. City staff will be allowed to set up schedules of operation for the HVAC equipment so that energy savings can be realized when the building or spaces in the building are unoccupied". The new system will also allow customized web based management of HVAC equipment, allowing for optimal control of start up and shut down programs resulting in maximum energy efficiency. The system will compare space temperature, outside air conditions, and equipment capabilities so that the equipment can be turned on at an appropriate time to ensure space set points are achieved. The new system will be based on zone demand so that heating and cooling sources will change according to demand from the zones. in a VAV system all the VAV boxes are served from a central air handling unit. The supply air temperature set point of the air handler will automatically be changed to prevent mechanical cooling from occurring when it is unnecessary. The new system will have the ability to monitor energy usage including the ability to meter electric, gas, water, hot water, chilled water, and can offer load shedding when power companies are at peak demand. The ability to send alarms via email, pager, or telephone to alert facilities staff of developing problems and system failures will ensure occupant comfort and productivity as well as constant energy efficiency. Total system design cost: $240,000.00 Project management cost: $96,358.50 Installation cost: $963,585.00 Total estimated cost $1,299,943.50 Last Name: Quaintance It you are proposing more than one activity, save this file as many times as needed with successive page numbers. For example: 'OH-CITY-Co/umbus- ProjectActivity page 1.pd(," "OH-CITY-Columbus-Project Activity page 2.pdf,"and continue as needed. EECBG Activity Worksheet Grantee: City of Rancho DUNS#: ~osz9~o Program Contact Email: _ Date: 06/03/2009 tom.grahn®cityof rc.us P490 Program Contact First Name: Thomas Last Name: crahn Project Title: Home improvement Program Energy Efficiency Revolving Loan ACtlVity: 1. Energy Efficiency and Conservation Strategy If Other: Sector: Residential If Other: Proposed Number of Jobs Created: 0_00 Proposed Energy Saved and/or Renewable Energy Generated: ~ Proposed GHG Emissions Reduced (C02 Equivalents): o . o00 Proposed Funds Leveraged: $400,000.00 Proposed EECBG Budget: luu,~vu.vu Projected Costs Within Budget: Administration: _ Project Contact First Name: Cathy MetflC Activity: Financial Incentives: S Ef fi & Covered Investments If Other: Project Summary: (limit summary to space provided) The City will be receiving $1,021,019 from HUD under the 2009 CDBG Appropriations and will provide approximately $400,000 of those funds to the City's Home Improvement Program, which provides grants up to $7,500 and loans up to $30,000 to low-income eligible single family and mobile home owners. The grants are not repaid, however the loans are provided interest free until the property is refinanced or sold at which time the loan ie repaid. Loans under the City's Program are revolving loans which when repaid are reapplied to new loans 'f or low-income homeowners. The EECBG funds would provide additional revolving loan funds for energy efficiency retrofits to any homes assisted under the City's Home improvement loan program. The retrofit could include new efficient HVAC unite, water heaters, etc. The City's CDBG program operates on a fiscal year calendar (July to June). The City's Home improvement program assists approximately 40 homeowners throughout the program year and there are approximately 200 persons on the waiting list. The City's Home Improvement Program could provide energy efficient loans to 10 qualified low-income homeowners by June 30, 2010. The proposed activity will provide $100,000 for the acquisition and instillation of energy efficient HVAC, water heaters, etc., for low-income homeowners. Providing funds to reduce energy operating costs would improve 1) the functionality of the HVAC and water heating capacity of the subject housing units, 2) would reduce the energy operating costs for the low-income homeowners. The effectiveness will be measured by reduced energy demand for the occupied units. The baseline guide for measuring effectiveness is to determine the average monthly energy coat for the subject unit. Planning will track and report the usage of EECBG funds for this project. Revolving Loans: $loo,ooo.oo Subgrants: Last Name: norris Emall: cathy.morrieacltyof rc .ve Proposed Number of Jobs Retained: 1_00 I/ you are proposing more than one activity, save this file as many times as needed with successive page numbers. For example: 'OH-CITY-Columbus- ProjectActivity page 1.pd/, "OH-CITY-Columbus-Project Activity page 2.pd/,'and continue as needed. EECBG Activity Worksheet Grantee: City of Rancho Cucamonga DUNS #: 7052970 Program Contact First Name: Thomas Project Title: Energy Efficient Appliances, Electrical, and Mechanical Equipment Program AC1lvity: i. Energy Efficiency and Conservation Strategy If Other: SeCfOr: Residential Proposed Number of Jobs Created: o_oo Proposed Energy Saved and/or Renewable Energy Generated: ~ Proposed GHG Emissions Reduced (C02 Equivalents): o.ooo Proposed Funds Leveraged: go.oo Proposed EECBG Budget: 57, ooo. 00 Projected Costs Within Budget: Administration: Project Contact First Name: Traz'9 Metric Activity: other Project Summary: (limit summary to space provided) P491 If Other: Subgrants: Emall: trang.huynhYCityof rc.ua The Building and Safety Department actively promotes the replacement and installation of energy efficient appliances and other mechanical and electrical equipment in both new and remodeled homes. City inspectors work with residents and developers to properly install Energy Star qualified appliances and equipment to reduce energy demand. Additionally, the department ie developing a way to incorporate the Green Building standards into the current energy efficiency program, and will send two Building Inspectors to be Green Building training certified. The result will be a comprehensive program that promotes energy efficient appliances and mechanical and electrical equipment and promotes austainability through green building standards. This activity will 1) establish a program to waive permit fees for the replacement and installation of energy e£f icient appliances and other mechanical and electrical equipment, and 2) will fund the training and Green Building certification of. two Building and Safety Inspectors. We anticipate the fee wavier program to backfill permit fees on approximately 1,659 permits and anticipate that our inspectors will be fully trained and certified within 24 months. Building and Safety continues to promote the health, safety and welfare, and the environmental economic health of the City by encouraging residents to use energy efficient appliances and other electrical and mechanical equipment in their homes during remodels and installations. As an added measure, Building and Safety will support and other City departments Green Building standards with two inspectors Green Building certified. On average, the city allocates approximately $150,000 on contract services for outside inspection services, but with certified inspectors who are currently doing inspections on energy efficient appliances and other equipment, these same inspectors would be qualified to conduct green building inspections, thereby allowing the City to redirect the general fund monies to other programs and services. Additionally, the use of City Building Inspectors for inspections will relieve homeowners from costly third party verification inspections. Ultimately, utilizing fully trained staff to conduct inspections can ensure our efforts of maintaining the most cost effective enforcement without having to obtain a third party consultant. The overall effectiveness of these programs will be measured by the number of permits and inspections issued through our permitting process, as well as the success of our staff properly trained on Green Building standards. Through overlapping resources with other departments, we can promote coat efficient, energy saving appliances and equipment inspections and support the Green Building Ordinance by encouraging developers to build green. Date: 06/03/2009 Program Contact Email: tom.grahn®cityofrc.us Last Name: Grahn If Other: Proposed Number of Jobs Retained: 2_00 Revolving Loans: Last Name: xuynh If you are proposing more than one activity, save this file as many times as needed with successive page numbers. For example: 'OH-CITY-Co/umbus- ProjectActivity page f.pdf,"'OH-CITY-Columbus-Project Activity page 2.pdt,"and continue as needed. EECBG Activity Worksheet P492 Grantee: City of Rancho Cucamonga Date: 06/03/2009 DUNS#: ~o5z9~o Program Contact Email: tom.grahn®cityofrc.us Program Contact First Name: Thomas Project Title: Energy Efficiency Coordinator ACtivlty: 1. Energy Efficiency and Conservation Strategy Sector: Public Proposed Number of Jobs Created: o_00 Proposed Energy Saved and/or Renewable Energy Generated: ~ Proposed GHG Emissions Reduced (C02 Equivalents): o . o00 Proposed Funds Leveraged: Proposed EECBG Budget: 49.950.00 Projected Costs Within Budget: Administration: Project Contact First Name: Fabian Metric Activity: other Last Name: Grann If Other: If Other: Proposed Number of Jobs Retained: 1_o0 Revolving Loans: Last Name: vil lenae If Other: Subgrants: Emall: fabian.villenaewicyofrc. ua Project Summary: (limit summary to space provided) This project will partially fund an existing staff member to serve as the Energy Efficiency Coordinator to oversee the City's efforts to reduce energy consumption and conduct a public outreach campaign to promote energy efficiency. This position will work closely with the City's existing "Green Team" in the development of the Sustainability Action Plan. This position will also assist in the carbon base line testing for the City as required by AE 32. The Energy Efficiency Coordinator would operate in this capacity for three years, the life of the grant . The Energy Efficiency Coordinator would be funded from an existing staff member. The Energy Efficiency Conservation Block Grant would fund $16,650 per year for three years, fora total program cost of $49,950. Funding the Energy Efficiency Coordinator will have lasting benefits to the energy efficiency of the City through the adoption of the Sustainability Action Plan and carbon base line testing. These programs will help the City to create a lasting strategy £or reducing its, emission of green house gases and consumption of electricity. Additionally, the Public Outreach Campaign will help to convey this information to the public, allow for public input in the process, and encourage residents of Rancho Cucamonga to take part in the effort to increase the City's energy efficiency. This position will be deemed to be euccesaful with the adoption o£ the Sustainability Action Plan and the completion of the City's carbon base line testing. Additional measurable results would be met through the Public outreach campaign, such as articles contributed to the City's quarterly newsletter The Reporter, hits to the City's website, and number of public benefit events programmed. The City Manager's Office would submit reports detailing this staff member's efforts once every quarter to comply with ARRA requirements. 1/you are proposing more than one activity, save this file as many times as needed with successive page numbers. For example: 'OH-CITY-Columbus- Project Activity page 1.pdf, "'OH-CITY-Columbus-Project Activity page 2.pdf,' and continue as needed. EECBG Activity Worksheet P493 Grantee: City of Rancho Cucamonga Date: 06/03/2009 DUNS#: 7052970 Program Contact Email: tom. gratin®cityof rc.us Program Contact First Name: Thomas Project Title: EECBG Program Administration ACtIVIty: 1. Energy Efficiency and Conservation Strategy Sector: rublic Proposed Number of Jobs Created: o_oo Proposed Energy Saved and/or Renewable Energy Generated: ~ Proposed GHG Emissions Reduced (C02 Equivalents): 0.000 Proposed Funds Leveraged: So.oo Proposed EECBG Budget: 159, 77c. oa Projected Costs Within Budget: Administration: 5159, 770.00 Revolving Loans: Project Contact First Name: Thomas Last Name: Drat"' Metric Activity: other - If Other: Project Summary: (limit summary to space provided) Subgrants: Emall: tom. grahnmcityofrc. us Administration of the EECBG grant and assistance in the implementation of identified activities. Administration activities will support sufficient staff for the timely submittal o£ the Energy Efficiency and Conservation Strategy, the implementation of proposed activities, and the timely reporting of activity accomplishments. Last Name: Gratin If Other: If Other: Proposed Number of Jobs Retained: 2_00 1/ you are proposing more than one activity, save this file as many times as needed with successive page numbers. For example: "OH-CITY-Columbus- Project Activity page 1.pdf,"'OH-CITY-Columbus-Project Acdviry page 2.pdf,"and continue as needed. Rancho Cucamonga Economic and Energy Efficiency Strategy P494 Page 1 IVETL F 451.1-EECBG U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY (38009) OPI=320 m""°"5~`°°°5°b5°`"`' ENVIRONMENTAL QUESTIONNAIRE BACKGROUND The Department of Energy (DOE) National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Implementing Procedures (10 CFR 1021) require careful consideration of the potential environmental consequences of all proposed actions during the early planning stages of a project or activity. DOE must determine at the earliest possible time whether such actions will require either an Environmental Assessment or an Environmental Impact Statement, or whether they qualify for a Categorical Exclusion. To comply with these requirements, an Environmental Questionnaire must be completed for each proposed action to provide DOE with the information necessary to determine the appropriate level of NEPA review. II. INSTRUCTIONS Separate copies of the Environmental Questionnaire should be completed by the principal proposer and appropriate proposer's subcontractor. In addition, if the proposed project includes activities at different locations, an independent questionnaire should be prepared for each location. Supporting information can be provided as attachments. In completing this Questionnaire, the proposer is requested to provide specific information and quantities, when applicable, regarding air emissions, wastewater discharges, solid wastes, etc., to facilitate the necessary review. The proposer should identify the location of the project and specifically describe the activities that would occur at that location. In addition, the proposer will be required to submit an official copy of the project's statement of work (SOW ) or statement of project objective (SOPO) that will be used in the contracUagreement between the proposer and DOE. III. QUESTIONNAIRE A. PROJECT SUMMARY 1. Solicitation/Project Number DE-FOA-0000013 2. Proposer: City of Rancho Cucamonga 3. Principal Investigator: Thomas Grahn Telephone Number: (909) 477-2750 4. Project Title: Civic Center Phase I -Replacement of HVAC Controls 5. Duration: September 30 2012 6. Location(s) of Pertormance (City/Township, County, State): Rancho Cucamonga. San Bernardino. CA 7. Identify and select checkbox with the predominant project work activities under Group A-7b or A-7c. Group A-7b ® Work or project activities does NOT involve new building/facilities construction and site preparation activities. This work typically involves routine operation, modification, and retrofit of existing utility and transportation infrastructure, laboratories, commercial buildings/properties, offices and homes, test facilities, factories/power plants, vehicles test stands and components, refueling facilities, greenspace infrastructure, or other existing facilities. Rancho Cucamonga Economic and Energy EHiciency Strategy P49cJ Page 2 Group A-7c ^ Work or project activities typically involves major building or facility construction, site preparation; the installation, replacement, or major modifications of energy system prototypes and infrastructure, access right-of- ways and roads; utility, greenspace, and transportation infrastructure, vehicle test facilities; commercial buildings/properties, fuel refinery/mixing facilities, factories/power plants; and other types of energy efficiency/conservation related systems, structures, and facilities. This work can require new or modified regulatory permits, environmental sampling and monitoring requirements, master planning, public involvement, and environmental impact review. ^ Other types of work or project activities not listed. (please describe) 8. Summarize the objectives of the proposed work. List activities planned at the location as covered by this Environmental Questionnaire. Civic Center Phase I -Replacement of HVAC Controls 9. List all other locations where proposed work or project would be performed by project's proposer and subcontractors. N/A 10. Identify major project operation related materials and waste that would be used, consumed, and produced by this project or activity. N/A 11. Provide a brief description of the project location (physical location, surrounding area, adjacent structures). The Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center is located at the northeast corner of Haven Avenue and Civic Center Drive. The Civic Center project site is fully developed. The property to the north, east, and south is developed with existing commercial and industrial buildings. The property to the west is vacant and is zoned for industrial development. 12. Attach a site plan or topographic map of the project work area. B. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS This section is designed to obtain information for objectively assessing the environmental impacts of a proposed project. NEPA procedures require evaluations of possible effects (including land use, energy resource use, natural, historic and cultural resources, and pollutants) from proposed projects on the environment. 1. Land Use a. Characterize present land use where the proposed project would be located. ^ Urban ^ Industrial ^ Commercial ^ Agricultural ® Suburban ^ Rural ^ Residential ^ Research Facilities ^ Forest ^ University Campus ® Other b. Describe how land use would be affected by planned construction and project activities. ® No construction would be anticipated for this project. c. Describe any plans to reclaim/replant areas that would be affected by the proposed project. ® No land areas would be affected. d. Would the proposed project affect any unique or unusual landforms (e.g., cliffs, watertalls, etc.)? ® No ^ Yes (describe) Rancho Cucamonga Economic and Energy Efficiency Strategy P4g6 Page 3 e. Would the proposed project be located in or near a national park or wilderness area? ® No ^ Yes (describe) 'If project work activities falls under item A-7b; then proceed directly to question B.6 (Atmospheric Conditions/Air Quality) and continue to fill out questionnaire. If project work falls under item A-7c; then proceed directly below to question B.2 (Construction Activities and/or O erations and continue to fill out uestionnaire. 2. Construction Activities and/or Operations a. Identify any roads, trails, or utility right of ways that traverse the proposed site or will be constructed and clearly mark them on project site maps. ^ None b. Would the proposed project require the construction of settling ponds? ^ No ^ Yes (describe and identify location, and estimate surtace area disturbed) c. Would the proposed project affect any existing body of water? ^ No ^ Yes (describe) d. Would the proposed project be located in or impact a floodplain or wetland? ^ No ^ Yes (describe) e. Would the proposed project be likely to cause runoff/sedimentation/erosion? ^ No ^ Yes (describe) 3. Vegetation and Wildlife Resources a. Identify any State- or Federal-listed endangered or threatened plant or animal species affected by the proposed project. ^ None b. Would any foreign substances/materials be introduced into ground or surface waters, or other earth/geologic resource because of project activities? Would these foreign substances/materials affect the water, soil, and geologic resources? ^ No ^ Yes (describe) c. Would any migratory animal corridors be impacted or disrupted by the proposed project? ^ No ^ Yes (describe) 4. Socioeconomic and Infrastructure Conditions. a. Would local socio-economic changes result from the proposed project? ^ No ^ Yes (describe) b. Would the proposed project generate increased traffic use of roads through local neighborhoods, urban or rural areas? ^ No ^ Yes (describe) c. Would the proposed project require new transportation access (roads, rail, etc.)? Describe location, impacts, costs. ^ No ^ Yes (describe) d. Would any new transmission lines and/or power line right-of-ways be required? ^ No ^ Yes (describe location, voltage, and length of line) Rancho Cucamonga Economic and Energy Efficiency Strategy P497 Page 4 5. Historical/Cultural Resources a. Describe any historical, archeological, or cultural sites in the vicinity of the proposed project; note any sites included on the National Register of Historic Places. ^ None b. Would construction or operational activities planned under thg proposed project disturb any historical, archeological, or cultural sites? ^ No planned construction ^ No historic sites ^Yes (describe) c. Would the proposed project interfere with visual resources (e.g., eliminate scenic views) or alter the present landscape? ^ No ^Yes (describe) For all proposed project work activities identified under item A-7b, respond to item B6 directly below and continue filling out environmental questionnaire. 6. Atmospheric Conditions/Air Quality a. Identify air quality conditions in the immediate vicinity of the proposed project with regard to attainment of National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAOS). This information is available under the NAAOS tables from the U.S. EPA Air and Radiation Division. Attainment Non-Attainment ~3 ^ SO. ® ^ PMto ^ CO ® ^ NOz ® ^ Lead ® ^ b. Would proposed project require issuance of new or modified major source air quality permits? ® No ^Yes (describe) c. Would the proposed project be in compliance with the National Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants? ^ No (explain) ®Yes d. W ould the proposed project be classified as either a New Source or a major modification to an existing source? ® No ^Yes (describe) e. Would the proposed project be in compliance with the New Source Performance Standards? ® Not Applicable ^ No (explain) ^Yes f. Would the proposed project be subject to prevention of significant deterioration air quality review? ® Not applicable ^ No (explain) ^Yes (describe) g. What types of air emissions, including fugitive emissions, would be anticipated from the proposed project? None h. Would any types of emission control or particulate collection devices be used? ® No ^Yes (describe, including collection efficiencies) i. If no control devices are used, how would emissions be vented? N/A Rancho Cucamonga Economic and Energy Efficiency Strategy P49$ Page 5 7. Hydrologic Conditions/Water Quality a. What is the closest body of water to the proposed project area and what is its distance from the project site? N/A b. What sources would supply potable and process water for the proposed project? Cucamonga Valley Water District c. Quantify the daily or annual amount of wastewater that would be generated by the proposed project. None d. Identify the local treatment facility that would receive wastewater from the proposed project. ® No discharges to local treatment facility e. Describe how wastewater would be collected and treated. N/A f. Would any run-off or leachates be produced from storage piles or waste disposal sites? ® No ^ Yes (describe source) g. Would project require issuance of new or modified water permits to perform project work or site development? ® No ^ Yes (describe) h. Where would wastewater effluents from the proposed project be discharged? ® No wastewater produced i. Would the proposed project be permitted to discharge effluents into an existing body of water? ® No ^ Yes (describe water use and effluent impact) j. Would a new or modified National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit be required? ® No ^ Yes (describe) k. Would the proposed project adversely affect the quality or movement of groundwater? ® No ^ Yes (describe) 8. Solid and Hazardous Wastes a. Describe and estimate major nonhazardous solid wastes that would be generated from the project. Solid wastes are defined as any solid, liquid, semi-solid, or contained gaseous material that is discarded or has served its intended purpose, or is a manufacturing or mining by-product (40 CFR 260, Appendix I). None b. Would project require issuance of new or modified solid waste and/or hazardous waste related permits to perform project work activities? ® No ^ Yes (explain) c. How and where would solid waste disposal be accomplished? ^ On-site (identify and describe location) ® Off-site (identify location and describe facility and treatment) Local Landfill d. How would wastes for disposal be transported? N/A e. Describe and estimate the uanti of hazardous wastes (40 CFR 261.31) that would be generated, used, or stored under this project. ® None f. How would hazardous or toxic waste be collected and stored? Rancho Cucamonga Economic and Energy Efficiency Strategy P499 Page 6 ® None used or produced g. If hazardous wastes would require off-site disposal, have arrangements been made with a certified TSD (Treatment, Storage, and Disposal) facility? ® Not required ^ Arrangements not yet made ^ Arrangements made with a certified TSD facility (identify): C. DESCRIBE ANY ISSUES THAT WOULD GENERATE PUBLIC CONTROVERSY REGARDING THE PROPOSED PROJECT. ® None IV. CERTIFICATION BY PROPOSER I hereby certify that the information provided herein is current, accurate, and complete as of the date shown immediately below. SIGNATURE: DATE: OS /20 / 2009 month day year TYPED NAME: Thomas Grahn TITLE: Associate Planner ORGANIZATION: Citv of Rancho Cucamonga V. REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY DOE I hereby certify that I have reviewed the information provided in this questionnaire, have determined that all questions have been appropriately answered, and judge the responses to be consistent with the efforts proposed. PROJECT MANAGER: SIGNATURE: DATE: / _ / month day year TYPED NAME: Rancho Cucamonga Economic and Energy Efficiency Strategy P500 Page t NETL F 451.1-EECBG U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY (3/2009) OPI=320 (Previous Editions Obsolete) ENVIRONMENTAL QUESTIONNAIRE BACKGROUND The Department of Energy (DOE) National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Implementing Procedures (10 CFR 1021) require careful consideration of the potential environmental consequences of all proposed actions during the early planning stages of a project or activity. DOE must determine at the earliest possible time whether such actions will require either an Environmental Assessment or an Environmental Impact Statement, or whether they qualify for a Categorical Exclusion. To comply with these requirements, an Environmental Questionnaire must be completed for each proposed action to provide DOE with the information necessary to determine the appropriate level of NEPA review. II. INSTRUCTIONS Separate copies of the Environmental Questionnaire should be completed by the principal proposer and appropriate proposer's subcontractor. In addition, if the proposed project includes activities at different locations, an independent questionnaire should be prepared for each location. Supporting information can be provided as attachments. In completing this Questionnaire, the proposer is requested to provide specific information and quantities, when applicable, regarding air emissions, wastewater discharges, solid wastes, etc., to facilitate the necessary review. The proposer should identify the location of the project and specifically describe the activities that would occur at that location. In addition, the proposer will be required to submit an official copy of the project's statement of work (SOW) or statement of project objective (SOPO) that will be used in the contract/agreement between the proposer and DOE. III. QUESTIONNAIRE A. PROJECT SUMMARY 1. Solicitation/Project Number DE-FOA-0000013 2. Proposer: Citv of Rancho Cucamonoa 3. Principal Investigator: Thomas Grahn Telephone Number: (909) 477-2750 4. Project Title: Home Imorovement Prooram Enerov Efficiency Revolvino Loan 5. Duration: September 30 2012 6. Location(s) of Performance (Ciry/Township, County, State): Rancho Cucamonoa, San Bernardino. CA 7. Identify and select checkbox with the predominant project work activities under Group A-7b or A-7c. Group A-7b ® Work or project activities does NOT involve new building/facilities construction and site preparation activities. This work typically involves routine operation, modification, and retrofit of existing utility and transportation infrastructure, laboratories, commercial buildings/properties, offices and homes, test facilities, factories/power plants, vehicles test stands and components, refueling facilities, greenspace infrastructure, or other existing facilities. Rancho Cucamonga Economic and Energy Efficiency Strategy P501 Page 2 Group A-7c ^ Work or project activities typically involves major building or facility construction, site preparation; the installation, replacement, or major modifications of energy system prototypes and infrastructure, access right-of- ways and roads; utility, greenspace, and transportation infrastructure, vehicle test facilities; commercial buildings/properties, fuel refinery/mixing facilities, factories/power plants; and other types of energy efficiency/conservation related systems, structures, and facilities. This work can require new or modified regulatory permits, environmental sampling and monitoring requirements, master planning, public involvement, and environmental impact review. ^ Other types of work or project activities not listed. (please describe) 8. Summarize the objectives of the proposed work. List activities planned at the location as covered by this Environmental Questionnaire. Home Improvement Program Energy Efficiency Revolving Loan 9. List all other locations where proposed work or project would be performed by project's proposer and subcontractors. City wide 10. Identify major project operation related materials and waste that would be used, consumed, and produced by this project or activity. N/A 11. Provide a brief description of the project location (physical location, surrounding area, adjacent structures). City wide 12. Attach a site plan or topographic map of the project work area. B. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS This section is designed to obtain information for objectively assessing the environmental impacts of a proposed project. NEPA procedures require evaluations of possible effects (including land use, energy resource use, natural, historic and cultural resources, and pollutants) from proposed projects on the environment. 1. Land Use a. Characterize present land use where the proposed project would be located. ^ Urban ^ Industrial ^ Commercial ^ Agricultural ® Suburban ^ Rural ® Residential ^ Research Facilities ^ Forest ^ University Campus ^ Other b. Describe how land use would be affected by planned construction and project activities. ® No construction would be anticipated for this project. c. Describe any plans to reclaim/replant areas that would be affected by the proposed project. ® No land areas would be affected. d. Would the proposed project affect any unique or unusual landforms (e.g., cliffs, watertalls, etc.)? ® No ^ Yes (describe) e. Would the proposed project be located in or near a national park or wilderness area? ® No ^ Yes (describe) Rancho Cucamonga Economic and Energy Efficiency Strategy P5~2 Page 3 If project work activities falls under item A-76; then proceed directly to question B.6 (Atmospheric Conditions/Air Quality) and continue to fill out questionnaire. If project work falls under item A-7c; then proceed directly below to question B.2 (Construction Activities and/or O erations and continue to fill out uestionnaire. 2. Construction Activities and/or Operations a. Identify any roads, trails, or utility right of ways that traverse the proposed site or will be constructed and clearly mark them on project site maps. ^ None b. Would the proposed project require the construction of settling ponds? ^ No ^ Yes (describe and identify location, and estimate surface area disturbed) c. Would the proposed project affect any existing body of water? ^ No ^ Yes (describe) d. Would the proposed project be located in or impact a floodplain or wetland? ^ No ^ Yes (describe) e. Would the proposed project be likely to cause runoff/sedimentation/erosion? ^ No ^ Yes (describe) 3. Vegetation and Wildlife Resources a. Identify any State- or Federal-listed endangered or threatened plant or animal species affected by the proposed project. ^ None b. Would any foreign substances/materials be introduced into ground or surface waters, or other earth/geologic resource because of project activities? Would these foreign substances/materials affect the water, soil, and geologic resources? ^ No ^ Yes (describe) c. Would any migratory animal corridors be impacted or disrupted by the proposed project? ^ No ^ Yes (describe) 4. Socioeconomic and Infrastructure Conditions. a. Would local socio-economic changes result from the proposed project? ^ No ^ Yes (describe) b. Would the proposed project generate increased traffic use of roads through local neighborhoods, urban or rural areas? ^ No ^ Yes (describe) c. Would the proposed project require new transportation access (roads, rail, etc.)? Describe location, impacts, costs. ^ No ^ Yes (describe) d. Would any new transmission lines and/or power line right-of-ways be required? ^ No ^ Yes (describe location, voltage, and length of line) Rancho Cucamonga Economic and Energy Efficiency Strategy P503 Page 4 5. HistoricaUCultural Resources a. Describe any historical, archeological, or cultural sites in the vicinity of the proposed project; note any sites included on the National Register of Historic Places. ^ None b. Would construction or operational activities planned under the proposed project disturb any historical, archeological, or cultural sites? ^ No planned construction ^ No historic sites ^Yes (describe) c. Would the proposed project intertere with visual resources (e.g., eliminate scenic views) or alter the present landscape? ^ No ^Yes (describe) For all proposed project work activities identified under item A-7b, respond to item B6 directly below and continue filling out environmental questionnaire. 6. Atmospheric Conditions/Air Quality a. Identify air quality conditions in the immediate vicinity of the proposed project with regard to attainment of National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAOS). This information is available under the NAAOS tables from the U.S. EPA Air and Radiation Division. Attainment Non-Attainment ~3 ^ SOx ® ^ PMio ^ CO ® ^ NOz ® ^ Lead ® ^ b. Would proposed project require issuance of new or modified major source air quality permits? ® No ^Yes (describe) c. Would the proposed project be in compliance with the National Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants? ^ No (explain) ®Yes d. W ould the proposed project be classified as either a New Source or a major modification to an existing source? ® No ^Yes (describe) e. Would the proposed project be in compliance with the New Source Performance Standards? ® Not Applicable ^ No (explain) ^Yes f. W oufd the proposed project be subject to prevention of significant deterioration air quality review? ® Not applicable ^ No (explain) ^Yes (describe) g. What types of air emissions, including fugitive emissions, would be anticipated from the proposed project? N/A h. Would any types of emission control or particulate collection devices be used? ® No ^Yes (describe, including collection efficiencies) i. If no control devices are used, how would emissions be vented? N/A Rancho Cucamonga Economic and Energy Efficiency Strategy P504 Page 5 7. Hydrologic Conditions/Water Quality a. What is the closest body of water to the proposed project area and what is its distance from the project site? N/A b. What sources would supply potable and process water for the proposed project? N/A c. Quantify the daily or annual amount of wastewater that would be generated by the proposed project. N/A d. Identify the local treatment facility that would receive wastewater from the proposed project. ® No discharges to local treatment facility e. Describe how wastewater would be collected and treated. N/A f. Would any run-off or leachates be produced from storage piles or waste disposal sites? ® No ^ Yes (describe source) g. Would project require issuance of new or modified water permits to perform project work or site development? ® No ^ Yes (describe) h. Where would wastewater effluents from the proposed project be discharged? ® No wastewater produced i. Would the proposed project be permitted to discharge effluents into an existing body of water? ® No ^ Yes (describe water use and effluent impact) j. Would a new or modified National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit be required? ® No ^ Yes (describe) k. Would the proposed project adversely affect the quality or movement of groundwater? ® No ^ Yes (describe) 8. Solld and Hazardous Wastes a. Describe and estimate major nonhazardous solid wastes that would be generated from the project. Solid wastes are defined as any solid, liquid, semi-solid, or contained gaseous material that is discarded or has served its intended purpose, or is a manufacturing or mining by-product (40 CFR 260, Appendix I). N/A b. Would project require issuance of new or modified solid waste and/or hazardous waste related permits to perform project work activities? ® No ^ Yes (explain) c. How and where would solid waste disposal be accomplished? ^ On-site (identify and describe location) ® Off-site (identify location and describe facility and treatment) Local Landfill d. How would wastes for disposal be transported? N/A e. Describe and estimate the uanti of hazardous wastes (40 CFR 261.31) that would be generated, used, or stored under this project. ® None f. How would hazardous or toxic waste be collected and stored? Fancho Cucamonga Economic and Energy EfFlCiency Strategy P5~5 Page 6 ® None used or produced g. If hazardous wastes would require off-site disposal, have arrangements been made with a certified TSD (Treatment, Storage, and Disposal) facility? ® Not required ^ Arrangements not yet made ^ Arrangements made with a certified TSD facility (identify): C. DESCRIBE ANY ISSUES THAT WOULD GENERATE PUBLIC CONTROVERSY REGARDING THE PROPOSED PROJECT. ® None IV. CERTIFICATION BY PROPOSER I hereby certify that the information provided herein is current, accurate, and complete as of the date shown immediately below. SIGNATURE: DATE: 05 / 20 / 2009 month day year TYPED NAME: Thomas Grahn TITLE: Associate Planner ORGANIZATION: City of Rancho Cucamonoa V. REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY DOE I hereby certify that I have reviewed the information provided in this questionnaire, have determined that all questions have been appropriately answered, and judge the responses to be consistent with the efforts proposed. PROJECT MANAGER: SIGNATURE: DATE: _ / / _ month day year TYPED Rancho Cucamonga Economic and Energy Efficiency Strategy P5~6 Page 1 NEIL F 451.1-EECBG U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY (?R009) OPI=320 (Previous Editions Obsolete) ENVIRONMENTAL QUESTIONNAIRE BACKGROUND The Department of Energy (DOE) National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Implementing Procedures (10 CFR 1021) require careful consideration of the potential environmental consequences of all proposed actions during the early planning stages of a project or activity. DOE must determine at the earliest possible time whether such actions will require either an Environmental Assessment or an Environmental Impact Statement, or whether they qualify for a Categorical Exclusion. To comply with these requirements, an Environmental Questionnaire must be completed for each proposed action to provide DOE with the information necessary to determine the appropriate level of NEPA review. II. INSTRUCTIONS Separate copies of the Environmental Questionnaire should be completed by the principal proposer and appropriate proposer's subcontractor. In addition, if the proposed project includes activities at different locations, an independent questionnaire should be prepared for each location. Supporting information can be provided as attachments. In completing this Questionnaire, the proposer is requested to provide specific information and quantities, when applicable, regarding air emissions, wastewater discharges, solid wastes, etc., to facilitate the necessary review. The proposer should identity the location of the project and specifically describe the activities that would occur at that location. In addition, the proposer will be required to submit an official copy of the project's statement of work (SOW) or statement of project objective (SOPO) that will be used in the contracUagreement between the proposer and DOE. A. PROJECT SUMMARY 1. Solicitation/Project Number DE-FOA-0000013 2. Proposer: Citv of Rancho Cucamonga 3. Principal Investigator: Thomas Grahn Telephone Number: (909) 477-2750 4. Project Title: Energy Efficient Appliances Electrical and Mechanical Equipment 5. Duration: September 30 2012 6. Location(s) of Pertormance (Citylfownship, County, State): Rancho Cucamonga San Bernardino, CA 7. Identify and select checkbox with the predominant project work activities under Group A-7b or A-7c. Group A-7b ® Work or project activities does NOT involve new building/facilities construction and site preparation activities. This work typically involves routine operation, modification, and retrofit of existing utility and transportation infrastructure, laboratories, commercial buildings/properties, offices and homes, test facilities, factories/power plants, vehicles test stands and components, refueling facilities, greenspace infrastructure, or other existing facilities. Rancho Cucamonga Economic and Energy Efficiency Strategy P507 Page 2 Group A-7c ^ Work or project activities typically involves major building or facility construction, site preparation; the installation, replacement, or major modifications of energy system prototypes and infrastructure, access right-of- ways and roads; utility, greenspace, and transportation infrastructure, vehicle test facilities; commercial buildings/properties, fuel refinery/mixing facilities, factories/power plants; and other types of energy efficiency/conservation related systems, structures, and facilities. This work can require new or modified regulatory permits, environmental sampling and monitoring requirements, master planning, public involvement, and environmental impact review. ^ Other types of work or project activities not listed. (please describe) 8. Summarize the objectives of the proposed work. List activities planned at the location as covered by this Environmental Questionnaire. Energy Efficiency Appliances, Electrical, and Mechanical Equipment Program 9. List all other locations where proposed work or project would be pertormed by project's proposer and subcontractors. N/A 10. Identify major project operation related materials and waste that would be used, consumed, and produced by this project or activity. N/A 11. Provide a brief description of the project location (physical location, surrounding area, adjacent structures). City wide 12. Attach a site plan or topographic map of the project work area. B. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS This section is designed to obtain information for objectively assessing the environmental impacts of a proposed project. NEPA procedures require evaluations of possible effects (including land use, energy resource use, natural, historic and cultural resources, and pollutants) from proposed projects on the environment. 1. Land Use a. Characterize present land use where the proposed project would be located. ^ Urban ^ Industrial ^ Commercial ^ Agricultural ® Suburban ^ Rural ® Residential ^ Research Facilities ^ Forest ^ University Campus ^ Other b. Describe how land use would be affected by planned construction and project activities. ® No construction would be anticipated for this project. c. Describe any plans to reclaim/replant areas that would be affected by the proposed project. ® No land areas would be affected. d. Would the proposed project affect any unique or unusual landforms (e.g., cliffs, waterfalls, etc.)? ® No ^ Yes (describe) e. Would the proposed project be located in or near a national park or wilderness area? ® No ^ Yes (describe) Rancho Cucamonga Economic and Energy Efficiency Strategy P5~8 Page 3 If project work activities falls under item A-7b; then proceed directly to question 8.6 (Atmospheric Conditions/Air Quality) and continue to fill out questionnaire. If project work falls under item A-7c; then proceed directly below to question 8.2 (Construction Activities and/or O erations and continue to fill out uestionnaire. 2. Construction Activities and/or Operations a. Identify any roads, trails, or utility right of ways that traverse the proposed site or will be constructed and clearly mark them on project site maps. ^ None b. Would the proposed project require the construction of settling ponds? ^ No ^ Yes (describe and identify location, and estimate surface area disturbed) c. Would the proposed project affect any existing body of water? ^ No ^ Yes (describe) d. Would the proposed project be located in or impact a floodplain or wetland? ^ No ^ Yes (describe) e. Would the proposed project be likely to cause runoff/sedimentation/erosion? ^ No ^ Yes (describe) 3. Vegetation and Wildlife Resources a. Identify any State- or Federal-listed endangered or threatened plant or animal species affected by the proposed project. ^ None b. Would any foreign substances/materials be introduced into ground or surface waters, or other earth/geologic resource because of project activities? Would these foreign substances/materials affect the water, soil, and geologic resources? ^ No ^ Yes (describe) c. Would any migratory animal corridors be impacted or disrupted by the proposed project? ^ No ^ Yes (describe) 4. Socioeconomic and Infrastructure Conditions. a. Would local socio-economic changes result from the proposed project? ^ No ^ Yes (describe) b. Would the proposed project generate increased traffic use of roads through local neighborhoods, urban or rural areas? ^ No ^ Yes (describe) c. Would the proposed project require new transportation access (roads, rail, etc.)? Describe location, impacts, costs. ^ No ^ -Yes (describe) d. Would any new transmission lines and/or power line right-of-ways be required? ^ No ^ Yes (describe location, voltage, and length of line) Rancho Cucamonga Economic and Energy Efficiency Strategy P5~9 Page 4 5. Historical/Cultural Resources a. Describe any historical, archeological, or cultural sites in the vicinity of the proposed project; note any sites included on the National Register of Historic Places. ^ None b. Would construction or operational activities planned under the proposed project disturb any historical, archeological, or cultural sites? ^ No planned construction ^ No historic sites ^Yes (describe) c. Would the proposed project intertere with visual resources (e.g., eliminate scenic views) or alter the present landscape? ^ No ^Yes (describe) For all proposed project work activities identified under item A-7b, respond to item B6 directly Below and continue fillip out environmental uestionnaire. 6. Atmospheric Conditions/Air Quality a. Identify air quality conditions in the immediate vicinity of the proposed project with regard to attainment of National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS). This information is available under the NAAOS tables from the U.S. EPA Air and Radiation Division. Attainment Non-Attainment ~3 ^ SO: ® ^ PMto ^ CO ® ^ NOz ® ^ Lead ® ^ b. Would proposed project require issuance of new or modified major source air quality permits? ® No ^Yes (describe) c. Would the proposed project be in compliance with the National Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants? ^ No (explain) ®Yes d. W ould the proposed project be classified as either a New Source or a major modification to an existing source? ® No ^Yes (describe) e. Would the proposed project be in compliance with the New Source Pertormance Standards? ® Not Applicable ^ No (explain) ^Yes f. Would the proposed project be subject to prevention of significant deterioration air quality review? ® Not applicable ^ No (explain) ^Yes (describe) g. What types of air emissions, including fugitive emissions, would be anticipated from the proposed project? N/A h. Would any types of emission control or particulate collection devices be used? ® No ^Yes (describe, including collection efficiencies) i. If no control devices are used, how would emissions be vented? N/A Rancho Cucamonga Economic and Energy Efficiency Strategy P51 O Page 5 7. Hydrologic Conditions/Water Duality a. What is the closest body of water to the proposed project area and what is its distance from the project site? N/A b. What sources would supply potable and process water for the proposed project? N/A c. Quantify the daily or annual amount of wastewater that would be generated by the proposed project. N/A d. Identify the local treatment facility that would receive wastewater from the proposed project. ® No discharges to local treatment facility e. Describe how wastewater would be collected and treated. N/A f. Would any run-off or leachates be produced from storage piles or waste disposal sites? ® No ^ Yes (describe source) g. Would project require issuance of new or modified water permits to perform project work or site development? ® No ^ Yes (describe) h. Where would wastewater effluents from the proposed project be discharged? ® No wastewater produced i. Would the proposed project be permitted to discharge effluents into an existing body of water? ® No ^ Yes (describe water use and effluent impact) j. Would a new or modified National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit be required? ® No ^ Yes (describe) k. Would the proposed project adversely affect the quality or movement of groundwater? ® No ^ Yes (describe) 8. Solid and Hazardous Wastes a. Describe and estimate major nonhazardous solid wastes that would be generated from the project. Solid wastes are defined as any solid, liquid, semi-solid, or contained gaseous material that is discarded or has served its intended purpose, or is a manufacturing or mining by-product (40 CFR 260, Appendix I). N/A b. Would project require issuance of new or modified solid waste and/or hazardous waste related permits to perform project work activities? ® No ^ Yes (explain) c. How and where would solid waste disposal be accomplished? ^ On-site (identify and describe location) ® Off-site (identify location and describe facility and treatment) Local Landfill d. How would wastes for disposal be transported? N/A e. Describe and estimate the uanti of hazardous wastes (40 CFR 261.31) that would be generated, used, or stored under this project. ® None f. How would hazardous or toxic waste be collected and stored? Rancho Cucamonga Economic and Energy Efficiency Strategy P51 Page 6 ® None used or produced g. If hazardous wastes would require off-site disposal, have arrangements been made with a certified TSD (Treatment, Storage, and Disposal) facility? ® Not required ^ Arrangements not yet made ^ Arrangements made with a certified TSD facility (identify): C. DESCRIBE ANY ISSUES THAT WOULD GENERATE PUBLIC CONTROVERSY REGARDING THE PROPOSED PROJECT. ® None IV. CERTIFICATION BY PROPOSER I hereby certify that the information provided herein is current, accurate, and complete as of the date shown immediately below. SIGNATURE: DATE: 05 / 20 / 2009 month day year TYPED NAME: Thomas Grahn TITLE: Associate Planner ORGANIZATION: Citv of Rancho Cucamonoa V. REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY DOE I hereby certify that I have reviewed the information provided in this questionnaire, have determined that all questions have been appropriately answered, and judge the responses to be consistent with the efforts proposed. PROJECT MANAGER: SIGNATURE: DATE: / / _ month day year TYPED NAME: Rancho Cucamonga Economic and Energy Efficiency Strategy PrJ~ 2 Page 1 hIETL F 451.1-EECBG U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY (3/2009) OPI=320 (Previous Editions Obsolete) ENVIRONMENTAL QUESTIONNAIRE BACKGROUND The Department of Energy (DOE) National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Implementing Procedures (10 CFR 1021) require careful consideration of the potential environmental consequences of all proposed actions during the early planning stages of a project or activity. DOE must determine at the earliest possible time whether such actions will require either an Environmental Assessment or an Environmental Impact Statement, or whether they qualify for a Categorical Exclusion. To comply with these requirements, an Environmental Questionnaire must be completed for each proposed action to provide DOE with the information necessary to determine the appropriate level of NEPA review. Separate copies of the Environmental Questionnaire should be completed by the principal proposer and appropriate proposer's subcontractor. In addition, if the proposed project includes activities at different locations, an independent questionnaire should be prepared for each location. Supporting information can be provided as attachments. In completing this Questionnaire, the proposer is requested to provide specific information and quantities, when applicable, regarding air emissions, wastewater discharges, solid wastes, etc., to facilitate the necessary review. The proposer should identify the location of the project and specifically describe the activities that would occur at that location. In addition, the proposer will be required to submit an official copy of the project's statement of work (SOW ) or statement of project objective (SOPO) that will be used in the contracUagreement between the proposer and DOE. III. QUESTIONNAIRE A. PROJECT SUMMARY 1. Solicitation/Project Number DE-FOA-0000013 2. Proposer: City of Rancho Cucamonoa 3. Principal Investigator: Thomas Grahn Telephone Number: (909) 477-2750 4. Project Title: Environmental Coordinator 5. Duration: September 30. 2012 6. Location(s) of Pertormance (City/Township, County, State): Rancho Cucamonoa. San Bernardino. CA 7. Identify and select checkbox with the predominant project work activities under Group A-7b or A-7c. Group A-7b ® Work or project activities does NOT involve new building/facilities construction and site preparation activities. This work typically involves routine operation, modification, and retrofit of existing utility and transportation infrastructure, laboratories, commercial buildings/properties, offices and homes, test facilities, factories/power plants, vehicles test stands and components, refueling facilities, greenspace infrastructure, or other existing facilities. Rancho Cucamonga Economic and Energy Efficiency Strategy P5~ 3 Page 2 Group A-7c ^ Work or project activities typically involves major building or facility construction, site preparation; the installation, replacement, or major modifications of energy system prototypes and infrastructure, access right-of- ways and roads; utility, greenspace, and transportation infrastructure, vehicle test facilities; commercial buildings/properties, fuel refinery/mixing facilities, factories/power plants; and other types of energy efficiency/conservation related systems, structures, and facilities. This work can require new or modified regulatory permits, environmental sampling and monitoring requirements, master planning, public involvement, and environmental impact review. ^ Other types of work or project activities not listed. (please describe) 8. Summarize the objectives of the proposed work. List activities planned at the location as covered by this Environmental Questionnaire. Energy Efficiency Coordinator 9. List all other locations where proposed work or project would be pertormed by project's proposer and subcontractors. N/A 10. Identify major project operation related materials and waste that would be used, consumed, and produced by this project or activity. N/A 11. Provide a brief description of the project location (physical location, surrounding area, adjacent structures). City wide 12. Attach a site plan or topographic map of the project work area. B. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS This section is designed to obtain information for objectively assessing the environmental impacts of a proposed project. NEPA procedures require evaluations of possible effects (including land use, energy resource use, natural, historic and cultural resources, and pollutants) from proposed projects on the environment. 1. Land Use a. Characterize present land use where the proposed project would be located. ^ Urban ^ Industrial ^ Commercial ^ Agricultural ® Suburban ^ Rural ^ Residential ^ Research Facilities ^ Forest ^ University Campus ® Other b. Describe how land use would be affected by planned construction and project activities. ® No construction would be anticipated for this project. c. Describe any plans to reclaim/replant areas that would be affected by the proposed project. ® No land areas would be affected. d. Would the proposed project affect any unique or unusual landforms (e.g., cliffs, watertalls, etc.)? ® No ^ Yes (describe) e. Would the proposed project be located in or near a national park or wilderness area? ® No ^ Yes (describe) Rancho Cucamonga Economic and Energy Efficiency Strategy P57 4 Page 3 If project work activities falls under item A-76; then proceed directly to question B.6 (Atmospheric Conditions/Air Quality) and continue to fill out questionnaire. If project work falls under item A-7c; then proceed directly below to question B.2 (Construction Activities and/or O erations and continue to fill out uestionnaire. 2. Construction Activities and/or Operations a. Identify any roads, trails, or utility right of ways that traverse the proposed site or will be constructed and clearly mark them on project site maps. ^ None b. Would the proposed project require the construction of settling ponds? ^ No ^ Yes (describe and identify location, and estimate surtace area disturbed) c. Would the proposed project affect any existing body of water? ^ No ^ Yes (describe) d. Would the proposed project be located in or impact a floodplain or wetland? ^ No ^ Yes (describe) e. Would the proposed project be likely to cause runoff/sedimentation/erosion? ^ No ^ Yes (describe) 3. Vegetation and Wildlife Resources a. Identify any State- or Federal-listed endangered or threatened plant or animal species affected by the proposed project. ^ None b. Would any foreign substances/materials be introduced into ground or surtace waters, or other earth/geologic resource because of project activities? Would these foreign substances/materials affect the water, soil, and geologic resources? ^ No ^ Yes (describe) c. Would any migratory animal corridors be impacted or disrupted by the proposed project? ^ No ^ Yes (describe) 4. Socioeconomic and Infrastructure Conditions. a. Would local socio-economic changes result from the proposed project? ^ No ^ Yes (describe) b. Would the proposed project generate increased traffic use of roads through local neighborhoods, urban or rural areas? ^ No ^ Yes (describe) c. Would the proposed project require new transportation access (roads, rail, etc.)? Describe location, impacts, costs. ^ No ^ Yes (describe) d. Would any new transmission lines and/or power line right-of-ways be required? ^ No ^ Yes (describe location, voltage, and length of line) Rancho Cucamonga Economic and Energy Efficiency Strategy P5~ 5 Page 4 5. Historical/Cultural Resources a. Describe any historical, archeological, or cultural sites in the vicinity of the proposed project; note any sites included on the National Register of Historic Places. ^ None b. Would construction or operational activities planned under the proposed project disturb any historical, archeological, or cultural sites? ^ No planned construction ^ No historic sites ^Yes (describe) c. Would the proposed project intertere with visual resources (e.g., eliminate scenic views) or alter the present landscape? ^ No ^Yes (describe) For all proposed project work activities identified under item A-7b, respond to item B6 directly below and continue filling out environmental questionnaire. 6. Atmospheric Conditions/Air duality a. Identify air quality conditions in the immediate vicinity of the proposed project with regard to attainment of National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS). This information is available under the NAAOS tables from the U.S. EPA Air and Radiation Division. Attainment Non-Attainment Oa ^ SOx ® ^ PMto ^ CO ® ^ NOz ® ^ Lead ® ^ b. Would proposed project require issuance of new or modified major source air quality permits? ® No ^Yes (describe) c. Would the proposed project be in compliance with the National Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants? ^ No (explain) ®Yes d. W ould the proposed project be classified as either a New Source or a major modification to an existing source? ® No ^Yes (describe) e. Would the proposed project be in compliance with the New Source Pertormance Standards? ® Not Applicable ^ No (explain) ^Yes f. Would the proposed project be subject to prevention of significant deterioration air quality review? ® Not applicable ^ No (explain) ^Yes (describe) g. What types of air emissions, including fugitive emissions, would be anticipated from the proposed project? N/A h. Would any types of emission control or particulate collection devices be used? ® No ^Yes (describe, including collection efficiencies) i. If no control devices are used, how would emissions be vented? N/A Rancho Cucamonga Economic and Energy Efficiency Strategy P5~ 6 Page 5 7. Hydrologic Conditions/Water duality a. What is the closest body of water to the proposed project area and what is its distance from the project site? N/A b. What sources would supply potable and process water for the proposed project? N/A c. Quantify the daily or annual amount of wastewater that would be generated by the proposed project. N/A d. Identify the local treatment facility that would receive wastewater from the proposed project. ® No discharges to local treatment facility e. Describe how wastewater would be collected and treated. N/A f. Would any run-off or leachates be produced from storage piles or waste disposal sites? ® No ^ Yes (describe source) g. Would project require issuance of new or modified water permits to perform project work or site development? ® No ^ Yes (describe) h. Where would wastewater effluents from the proposed project be discharged? ® No wastewater produced i. Would the proposed project be permitted to discharge effluents into an existing body of water? ® No ^ Yes (describe water use and effluent impact) j. Would a new or modified National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit be required? ® No ^ Yes (describe) k. Would the proposed project adversely affect the quality or movement of groundwater? ® No ^ Yes (describe) 8. Solid and Hazardous Wastes a. Describe and estimate major nonhazardous solid wastes that would be generated from the project. Solid wastes are defined as any solid, liquid, semi-solid, or contained gaseous material that is discarded or has served its intended purpose, or is a manufacturing or mining by-product (40 CFR 260, Appendix I). N/A b. Would project require issuance of new or modified solid waste and/or hazardous waste related permits to perform project work activities? ® No ^ Yes (explain) c. How and where would solid waste disposal be accomplished? ^ On-site (identify and describe location) ® Off-site (identify location and describe facility and treatment) N/A d. How would wastes for disposal be transported? N/A e. Describe and estimate the uanti of hazardous wastes (40 CFR 261.31) that would be generated, used, or stored under this project. ® None f. How would hazardous or toxic waste be collected and stored? Rancho Cucamonga Ecronomic and Energy Efficiency Strategy P51 7 Page 6 ® None used or produced g. If hazardous wastes would require off•site disposal, have arrangements been made with a certified TSD (Treatment, Storage, and Disposal) facility? ® Not required ^ Arrangements not yet made ^ Arrangements made with a certified TSD facility (identify): C. DESCRIBE ANY ISSUES THAT WOULD GENERATE PUBLIC CONTROVERSY REGARDING THE PROPOSED PROJECT. ® None IV. CERTIFICATION BY PROPOSER I hereby certify that the information provided herein is current, accurate, and complete as of the date shown immediately below. SIGNATURE: DATE: 05 / 20 / 2009 month day year TYPED NAME: Thomas Grahn TITLE: Associate Planner ORGANIZATION: City of Rancho Cucamonga V. REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY DOE I hereby certify that I have reviewed the information provided in this questionnaire, have determined that all questions have been appropriately answered, and judge the responses to be consistent with the efforts proposed. PROJECT MANAGER: SIGNATURE: DATE: _ / _ / _ month day year TYPED NAM Rancho Cucamonga Economic and Energy Efficiency Strategy P5~ 8 Page 7 NETLF451.1-EECBG U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY (32009) OPI=320 (Pre"°"S>:~`°°n=°b5°'"`' ENVIRONMENTAL QUESTIONNAIRE BACKGROUND The Department of Energy (DOE) National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Implementing Procedures (10 CFR 1021) require careful consideration of the potential environmental consequences of all proposed actions during the early planning stages of a project or activity. DOE must determine at the earliest possible time whether such actions will require either an Environmental Assessment or an Environmental Impact Statement, or whether they qualify for a Categorical Exclusion. To comply with these requirements, an Environmental Questionnaire must be completed for each proposed action to provide DOE with the information necessary to determine the appropriate level of NEPA review. Separate copies of the Environmental Questionnaire should be completed by the principal proposer and appropriate proposer's subcontractor. In addition, if the proposed project includes activities at different locations, an independent questionnaire should be prepared for each location. Supporting information can be provided as attachments. In completing this Questionnaire, the proposer is requested to provide specific information and quantities, when applicable, regarding air emissions, wastewater discharges, solid wastes, etc., to facilitate the necessary review. The proposer should identify the location of the project and specifically describe the activities that would occur at that location. In addition, the proposer will be required to submit an official copy of the project's statement of work (SOW) or statement of project objective (SOPO) that will be used in the contracVagreement between the proposer and DOE. A. PROJECT SUMMARY 1. Solicitation/Project Number DE-FOA-0000013 2. Proposer: City of Rancho Cucamonga 3. Principal Investigator: Thomas Grahn Telephone Number: (9091 477-2750 4. Project Title: EECBG Procram Administration 5. Duration: September 30 2012 6. Location(s) of Performance (City/Township, County, State): Rancho Cucamonoa San Bernardino. CA 7. Identify and select checkbox with the predominant project work activities under Group A-7b or A-7c. Group A-7b ® Work or project activities does NOT involve new building/facilities construction and site preparation activities. This work typically involves routine operation, modification, and retrofit of existing utility and transportation infrastructure, laboratories, commercial buildings/properties, offices and homes, test facilities, factories/power plants, vehicles test stands and components, refueling facilities, greenspace infrastructure, or other existing facilities. Rancho Cucamonga Economic and Energy Efficiency Strategy P51 9 Page 2 Group A-7c ^ Work or project activities typically involves major building or facility construction, site preparation; the installation, replacement, or major modifications of energy system prototypes and infrastructure, access right-of- ways and roads; utility, greenspace, and transportation infrastructure, vehicle test facilities; commercial buildings/properties, fuel refinery/mixing facilities, factories/power plants; and other types of energy efficiency/conservation related systems, structures, and facilities. This work can require new or modified regulatory permits, environmental sampling and monitoring requirements, master planning, public involvement, and environmental impact review. ^ Other types of work or project activities not listed. (please describe) 8. Summarize the objectives of the proposed work. List activities planned at the location as covered by this Environmental Questionnaire. EECBG Administration 9. List all other locations where proposed work or project would be performed by project's proposer and subcontractors. N/A 10. Identify major project operation related materials and waste that would be used, consumed, and produced by this project or activity. N/A 11. Provide a brief description of the project location (physical location, surrounding area, adjacent structures). N/A 12. Attach a site plan or topographic map of the project work area. B. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS This section is designed to obtain information for objectively assessing the environmental impacts of a proposed project. NEPA procedures require evaluations of possible effects (including land use, energy resource use, natural, historic and cultural resources, and pollutants) from proposed projects on the environment. 1. Land Use a. Characterize present land use where the proposed project would be located. ^ Urban ^ Industrial ^ Commercial ^ Agricultural ® Suburban ^ Rural ^ Residential ^ Research Facilities ^ Forest ^ University Campus ® Other b. Describe how land use would be affected by planned construction and project activities. ® No construction would be anticipated for this project. c. Describe any plans to reclaim/replant areas that would be affected by the proposed project. ® No land areas would be affected. d. Would the proposed project affect any unique or unusual landforms (e.g., cliffs, waterfalls, etc.)? ® No ^ Yes (describe) e. Would the proposed project be located in or near a national park or wilderness area? ® No ^ Yes (describe) Rancho Cucamonga Economic and Energy Efficiency Strategy P52~ Page 3 If project work activities falls under item A-7b; then proceed directly to question B.6 (Atmospheric Conditions/Air Quality) and continue to fill out questionnaire. If project work falls under item A-7c; then proceed directly below to question B.2 (Construction Activities and/or O erations and continue to fill out uestionnaire. 2. Construction Activities and/or Operations a. Identify any roads, trails, or utility right of ways that traverse the proposed site or will be constructed and clearly mark them on project site maps. ^ None b. Would the proposed project require the construction of settling ponds? ^ No ^ Yes (describe and identify location, and estimate surtace area disturbed) c. Would the proposed project affect any existing body of water? ^ No ^ Yes (describe) d. Would the proposed project be located in or impact a floodplain or wetland? ^ No ^ Yes (describe) e. Would the proposed project be likely to cause runoff/sedimentation/erosion? ^ No ^ Yes (describe) 3. Vegetation and Wildlife Resources a. Identify any State- or Federal-listed endangered or threatened plant or animal species affected by the proposed project. ^ None b. Would any foreign substances/materials be introduced into ground or surtace waters, or other earth/geologic resource because of project activities? Would these foreign substances/materials affect the water, soil, and geologic resources? ^ No ^ Yes (describe) c. Would any migratory animal corridors be impacted or disrupted by the proposed project? ^ No ^ Yes (describe) 4. Socioeconomic and Infrastructure Conditions. a. Would local socio-economic changes result from the proposed project? ^ No ^ Yes (describe) b. Would the proposed project generate increased traffic use of roads through local neighborhoods, urban or rural areas? ^ No ^ Yes (describe) c. Would the proposed project require new transportation access (roads, rail, etc.)? Describe location, impacts, costs. ^ No ^ Yes (describe) d. Would any new transmission lines and/or power line right-of-ways be required? ^ No ^ Yes (describe location, voltage, and length of line) Rancho Cucamonga Economic and Energy Efficiency Strategy P5•Z1 Page 4 5. Historical/Cultural Resources a. Describe any historical, archeological, or cultural sites in the vicinity of the proposed project; note any sites included on the National Register of Historic Places. ^ None b. Would construction or operational activities planned under the proposed project disturb any historical, archeological, or cultural sites? ^ No planned construction ^ No historic sites ^Yes (describe) c. Would the proposed project intertere with visual resources (e.g., eliminate scenic views) or alter the present landscape? ^ No ^Yes (describe) ,For all proposed project work activities identified under item A-7b, respond to item 86 directly below and 'continue filling out environmental questionnaire. 6. Atmospheric Conditions/Air duality a. Identify air quality conditions in the immediate vicinity of the proposed project with regard to attainment of National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS). This information is available under the NAAQS tables from the U.S. EPA Air and Radiation Division. Attainment Non-Attainment Os ^ SOx ® ^ PMto ^ CO ® ^ NOZ ® ^ Lead ® ^ b. Would proposed project require issuance of new or modified major source air quality permits? ® No ^Yes (describe) c. Would the proposed project be in compliance with the National Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants? ^ No (explain) ®Yes d. Would the proposed project be classified as either a New Source or a major modification to an existing source? ® No ^Yes (describe) e. Would the proposed project be in compliance with the New Source Pertormance Standards? ® Not Applicable ^ No (explain) ^Yes f. Would the proposed project be subject to prevention of significant deterioration air quality review? ® Not applicable ^ No (explain) ^Yes (describe) g. What types of air emissions, including fugitive emissions, would be anticipated from the proposed project? N/A h. Would any types of emission control or particulate collection devices be used? ® No ^Yes (describe, including collection efficiencies) i. If no control devices are used, how would emissions be vented? N/A Rancho Cucamonga Economic and Energy Efficiency Strategy P522 Page 5 7. Hydrologic Conditions/Water Quality a. What is the closest body of water to the proposed project area and what is its distance from the project site? N/A b. What sources would supply potable and process water for the proposed project? N/A c. Quantify the daily or annual amount of wastewater that would be generated by the proposed project. N/A d. Identify the local treatment facility that would receive wastewater from the proposed project. ® No discharges to local treatment facility e. Describe how wastewater would be collected and treated. N/A f. Would any run-off or leachates be produced from storage piles or waste disposal sites? ® No ^ Yes (describe source) g. Would project require issuance of new or modified water permits to pertorm project work or site development? ® No ^ Yes (describe) h. Where would wastewater effluents from the proposed project be discharged? ® No wastewater produced i. Would the proposed project be permitted to discharge effluents into an existing body of water? ® No ^ Yes (describe water use and effluent impact) j. Would a new or modified National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit be required? ® No ^ Yes (describe) k. Would the proposed project adversely affect the quality or movement of groundwater? ® No ^ Yes (describe) 8. Solid and Hazardous Wastes a. Describe and estimate major nonhazardous solid wastes that would be generated from the project. Solid wastes are defined as any solid, liquid, semi-solid, or contained gaseous material that is discarded or has served its intended purpose, or is a manufacturing or mining by-product (40 CFR 260, Appendix I). N/A b. Would project require issuance of new or modified solid waste and/or hazardous waste related permits to pertorm project work activities? ® No ^ Yes (explain) c. How and where would solid waste disposal be accomplished? ^ On-site (identify and describe location) ® Off-site (identify location and describe facility and treatment) N/A d. How would wastes for disposal be transported? N/A e. Describe and estimate the uanti of hazardous wastes (40 CFR 261.31) that would be generated, used, or stored under this project. ® None f. How would hazardous or toxic waste be collected and stored? Rancho Cucamonga Economic and Energy Efficiency Strategy P523 Page 6 ® None used or produced g. If hazardous wastes would require off-site disposal, have arrangements been made with a certified TSD (Treatment, Storage, and Disposal) facility? ® Not required ^ Arrangements not yet made ^ Arrangements made with a certified TSD facility (identify): C. DESCRIBE ANY ISSUES THAT WOULD GENERATE PUBLIC CONTROVERSY REGARDING THE PROPOSED PROJECT. ® None IV. I hereby certify that the information provided herein is current, accurate, and complete as of the date shown immediately below. SIGNATURE: DATE: 05 / 20 / 2009 month day year TYPED NAME: Thomas Grahn TITLE: Associate Planner ORGANIZATION: City of Rancho Cucamonoa V. REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY DOE I hereby certify that I have reviewed the information provided in this questionnaire, have determined that all questions have been appropriately answered, and judge the responses to be consistent with the efforts proposed. PROJECT MANAGER: SIGNATURE: DATE: _ / _ / month day year TYPED P524 FINANCIAL MANGEMENT ASSESSMENT This assessment should be completed, signed and certified by the Applicant's Financial Officer YES NO 1. Have you previously done business with DOE? ^ 2. Have you previously done business with any other Federal Agency? ® ^ If so, please identHy US Department of Homeland Security US Department of Transportation US Department of Housing and Urban Development US Department of Justice 3. Can the Applicant's Financial Officer or Independent Auditor certify that the Applicant has a financial management system sufficient to meet the requirements of 10 CFR 600.220? ® ^ If yes, please skip to question #10 and sign/certify below. 4. Dces your accounting system have the ability to track costs on a reimbursable basis? ^ ^ 5. Does your system allow for accurate, current and complete financial reporting, and record keeping as well as the maintaining of adequate source documentation? ^ ^ 6. Does your system allow for effective internal controls and accountability? ^ ^ 7. Does your system allow for effective and efficient cash management procedures? ^ ^ 8. Does your system prohibit subaward at any tier to any party which is debarred, suspended or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs? ^ ^ 9. The expenditure of $500,000 or more of Federal funds in a fiscal year requires an organization to have an audit performed in accordance with OMB Circular A-133. Has your organization had such an audit performed? ^ ^ 10. If yes, please provide the most recent report or a copy of the SF-SAC forms filed with the Federal Audit Clearinghouse. If no, proceed to the next statement and certify by checking the YES bl k. I understand t e dit re irements and will comply with the provisions of OMB Circular A-133. ® ^ WendvTono, Senior Accountant, (909) 477-2700, ext 2433 Mav 11.2009 PRINTED NAME, TITLE AND PHONE NUMBER OF INDIVIDUAL COMPLETING FORM DATE By signing this form, the above individual certifies that the responses provided to this survey are accurate as of the date. If "NO" has been selected for any of the statements above, please provide further explanation on page 2. P525 INTERNET REPORT ID: 320573 VERSION: 1 OMB No. 0348-0057 FORM SF-SAC U.S. DEPT. OFCOMM.- Emn. arW Btal. AGmNf.- U.S. CENSUS BUREAU ACTING AS COLLECTING AGENT FOR l (ba-]008) OFFICE 0: MANAGlMENT AND BUDGET Data Collection Form for Reporting on AUDITS OF STATES, LOCAL GOVERNMENTS, AND NONPROFIT ORGANIZATIONS for Fiscal Year Endin Dates in 2008, 2009 or 2010 ' Complete this form, as required by OMB Circular A-133, "Audits of States, Local Governments, and Non-Profit Organizations." -PARTY GENERAL INFORMATION (To be completed by audltee, except for Items 6, 7, and 8) 1. Fiscal period ending date for this submission 2. Type of Circular A-133 audit 3. Audit period covered Month Day Year t ®Single audit t ®Annuai 3 ^ Other - ~ MonthS 06 / 30 /2008 z^Program-specific audit z^Biennial 4. Auditee Identification Numbers a. Primary E Oyer Identification Number (EIN) d. Data Universal Numbering System (DUNS) Number 9 5 3 2 3 0 0 2 - 0 0- 7 0 5 - 2 9 7 0 b. multipl INs ce red in this report? t ^ Yes 2 ®No e. Are multiple DUNS covered in this report? t ^ Yes z ®No If Part I, em 4 - "Yes, complete Part I, Item 4c f. If Part I, Item 4e = "Yes," complete Part I, Item 4f on the ontinuatio sheet n Page 4. on the continuation sheet on Page 4. 5. AU - EE INFORMA ION 6. PRIMARY AUDITOR INFORMATION (To be completed by auditor) a. Auditee name a. Primary auditor name OT' OF RANCHO C AMONGA LANCE, bOLL b LUNGHARO. LLP b. uditee ad ess (Nu er and et) ~ b. Primary auditor address (Number and street) P.O. D] P03 N. BREA BLVD, SUITE 303 _ CiTy Ciry CHOC TONGA BRFA State + q Code State ZIP + q Cotle CA 9 1 7 2 0 8 7 CA 9 2 8 _ 4 0 5 6 c. Auditee coot t e. Primary auditor contact Name Name TAMARA LAYCE RICHARD KIKUCHI Title Title DIRECTOR OF FINANCE PA NER d. Auditee contact telephone d. Prima auditor contact telephone 909 477 - 2700 714 672 - 0022 e. Auditee contact FAX Pri ry auditor contact FAX 909 477 - 2845 7 4 672 - 0331 f. Auditee contact E-mail f. P Imary auditor coot ct E•mail TAMARA.LAYNE CITYOFRC.CAUS ICHARD.KIKUCHI sL S.COM g• AUDITEE CERTIFICATION STATEMENT - This I g. A ITOR STAT ENT - e data elements and information to certify that, to the best of my knowledge and belief, the in luded in this f are limited to ose prescribed by OMB auditee has: (1) engaged an auditor to perform an audit Ircular A-13 . e info 'on incl din Parts II and III of the in accordance with the provisions of OMB Circular A-133 orm, exce or Part II terns , 8, an a-9f, was transferred for the period described in Part I, Items 1 and 3; (2) the from the ditor's re rt(s) fort period scribed in Part I, Items auditor has completed such audit and presented a signe 1 and ,and is not substitut for suc eports. The auditor audit report which states that the audit was conducted in has t perfo d any Biting proc ure sin a the date of the accordance with the provisions of the Circular; and, (3) a Itor's rep (s A copy f the report pa a required by the information included in Parts 1, 11, antl Itl of this MB Circ rA-13 which ludes the c piece dltor's data collection form is accurate and complete. I declare reports s available ~ its entl ty from the ditee a he address that the foregoing is true and correct. ovi in Part 1 of this rm s required by B Circ r A-133, the' ormation in Parts nd 111 of this form enter in this form by the auditor based on information include the rep ing Auditee cert~cation Date package. The auditor has not performed any a Itionai audilin procedures in connection with the completio f this for NOT FOR SUBMISSION 7a. Add Secondary auditor informati (Optio al) Name of certifying official t ^ Yes z ®No b. if "Yes," complete Part 1, Item on the co Inuation NOT FOR SUBMISSION sheet on page 5. Title of certifying official Auditor certification Date NAT F(lR SIIRMISRIf]N Nnr rno el IQNeIeclnM P526 INTERNET REPORT ID: 320573 VERSION: 1 Primary EIN: 9 5- 3 2 1 3 0 0 PART 11 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (To 6e completed by auditor) t. Type of audit report Mark either: t ~ Unqual~ed opinion OR any combination of: z ^ Qualifed opinion 3 ^ Adverse opinion a ^ Disclaimer of opinion 2 Is a "going concern" explanatory paragraph included ~in the audit report? t ^ Yes 2 ©No 3. Is a significant deficiency disclosed? t ^ Yes 2 ^D No -SKIP fo Item 5 4. Is any significant deficiency reported as a material weakness? t ^ Yes z ^ No 5. Is a m riot nonc pliance disclosed? t ^ Yes z x^ No P ' 111`. FED AL PROGRAMS (To be completed by auditor) 7 Does th auditor's port i lude a statement that the auditee's financial state nts include partm nts, agencies, or other organizational units ezp ding $500,000 r mot in Federal awards that have separate A-133 a its which are not i clude in this audit? (AICPA Audit Guide, Chapter 12) t ^ Yes 2 ®No What is the dollar reshot to distin Type A and Type B programs? $ 300,o0D OMB Circular -133 § .520(b) Did the auditee qu as a -risk a e? (§ .530) t ^X Yes z ^ No 4. Is a signifcant defcie disclose or any maj progr ? (§ _ .510(a)(1)) t ^ Yes z®No -SKIP to Item 6 5. Is any significant eficiency a rted fo ny ma' r progr m as a material weakness? (§ .510( 1)) t ^ Yes z ^ No 6. Are any known qu tinned vests eport 10(a)(3) or (4)) t ^ Yes z ^X No 7. Were Prior Audit Findings relate to dir ct funding shown in the mar chedule of Prior Audit Findings? (§_ 31 b)) t ^ Yes 2 ®No 8. Indicate which Federal agen (ies) ve current r audit fndin elated o direct funding or prior audit findings shown in the Summary Schedule of Prl Au it Find' related to di f nding. Mark (X) all that apply or None) ae ^ U.S. Ageno/ for Inter- a National Aeronautics and ss ^ Social Security national Development Space Admi ' ration Administration to ^ Agriculture ss ^ Gen rat Service dminis anon sa ^ National hive nd is ^ U.S. Department za ^ Appalachian Regional ss ^ Health and Human rvices Record dministra' n of Stale Commission s~ ^ Homeland Security os ^ Nati al Endo ent fo zo ^ Transportation tt ^ Commerce t Arts to ^ Housing and Urban t ^ Treasury sa ^ Corporation for National Development ss aticnal dowme for and Community Service os ^ Institute of Museum nd the Hum hies 72 ^ Defense Library Services 7 ^ Nat nal Sa ce V tans Affairs ea ^ Education is ^ Interior F n tion oo one et ^ Energy is ^ Justice 0~ ~onteol poational 9 they- ecify: se ^ Environmental n ^ Labor s ^ Small Busines Protection Agency as ^ Legal Services Corporation Administration Page 2 FOftM aF~SAC (&620081 P527 0 0 M a~ I m Z w Z' E a` w 0 rn a z 0 N LC w r N 0 0 K O a w K W H z m N 'O U.M.. C ` ~ ~ v.o a v y vvE z a'`'= a a a a a a a a o z 'z z 'z 'z 'z i 'z s Z ~ OI N C N ~ _ mE ~ d c OD a ~ mad m v o o E ~ aE._ m m M ' C ~"~ O O O O O O O O Q rn~ w ° ~ m c c o ~- a U M n O N U m a n -~z~ L a p m p S ° K NZ ~ m g~ ~ Ln ~ T ° `~ O q Jg ZO o _ o. E y o 9`~i o a"i o O v o 0 9Ni o y o a"i o y o o° m '° ~°~ m YZ }Z } Z Z } Z Z }Z }Z }Z }Z S ~ ~o ^® ^® ^ ® ® ^ ® ~ ®^ ^® ^^ ^^ `w E ° ~ N N « N N N N ~ N N .- N N E C C C 7 n i ~ a N m o N m o N m o H m o N m o N m o N m o o N W o N m o x v ~ 'y o c ~ m m } Z } Z } Z } Z } Z } Z Y Z Z } Z } Z ~ O v ®^ ^® ^ ® ^^ ^^ y ~ ~. ~ m m~ « E 10 C C m ry ^ ~ N ~ N N N .- N ~ N N f N N ~ m . ° C d T O ~ m O L Ec ~ 2 0 0 0 o 0 0 o o o 0 0 m i = d a ° a ° 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o ma E o e `N+l r 10 10 "O ' N N E~0 t1pO d udi ti ~ ~ 6 J _ V M) OD r r r m O N `~ !E O D O m 3 L m O N O r N ~ M Q m m LL N IL [C C d O O O1 9,1 N : d E a - N a ~~ ° ~ Y A x - a ax m a ° > ca m m OL 'a CO to fA d) vi to Vi HY fA df fA M O d U m V" a c s c m u E a~ m ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O y ~" o m 's ¢ ~ i a < n a ao. E r n - o Q;, a L° z m i d Z ' O ui H F ~ o" ci ¢ u L O L C > p O 6 i < a d , 4 °= ' n~`c ` u m m U Q R' ~ ~ ~ s Q m m vh Tn D`- O m N m 2 d d t d E O m V l ' rc f C. O ` _ p d ~"~ Z n P D m e F ~ F ~ ~ ~ a nD ~~ f O~ V O z C q 2 Q s a J 2 d c r°. d d m CY ' m¢ W ^~ J U ~c U' !L ~ W ~ W p Y N~ ~ C q+ d `d O C Q E a w '~ ~ z W p w a V ~ o n~ ~~ ~E ~< t ul Z m ~ ~ z ~ u ¢ i w F ~ W _ m ~ vrm mo °~v i a 0 W (J C O C E N OI y'- W W~ C (7 O 2 f m t C J Z Q W c n ~~ W li C~ ] g p ~ p ~ a M W m W l ) ~, o mo d Z ~ W a F a o ° c ~ ` ¢ - E m ¢ v w s s °w 7 ~ W w m °- !3 c w m aU~K n~ 3 n O { /1 ~m y ° E y 3 ' a v 5 ~ ~ W t ~ O. N m 0 N m 0 N N O O N 0) O N m 0 m N N O Vl 0) O N w 0 O ~ t4 o N .E , o y N d O 6 ~ n o ~_~~~ }Z }Z }Z }Z }Z }Z } }Z }Z }Z a F ~ ~~-v" ' H o w vma~iEy ^® ^® ^ ^® ^® ® ^^ ^^ ~ m ~ 1 3 v°m dM LL LC D ~' N ~ N ~ N ~ N N N ~ N ~ N d U y d d d N~ m~ X Q 2 E m~ ~= 3 y w~ w m o o my ' J Q _ E c o rn E ~ L_ U N ' N ° m O ~ N ~ ~ m C C O C O O ~;Z.E~.~Mr~ aMia E c ~ ' Q ~ d o~ m~ ~ o~ , J Z w ~ tr0 Ir0 M M O O O LL 4 t ~ ~ ~~ Q a U L a N O O O ~ r O N O , Q - m a m U ° E W O _ _ _ __ ... . __ __ -- -.. .. Q ~ n ~ ._ LL W' y v d m - -- - - - - - -- -- - -- - 0 ~ LL Q 2 Ol O+ O~ Op N N d 7 C C O V ( N a S v 6 J Q Q W D W LL f G Q 6 FORM SF-SAC (8620!)9) L O a U c N m 0 O ro iw nZ oZ ~ ~ O ]Q Z N Page 3 `•Z ~ '}'r ~ je ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ ,o ~ ~ i ~ v ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ ~ ._ a ~ m ~ o ,V ~ ^ V p ~ ~. W ~- a ~ m ~ ~a ~ V = ~ ~~w ~~ ~ ~ W '~ 4 ~~~ `h ~ ~ ,~ W W ~~° ~ ~ a ~~ ~ >, ~ Y i .~ ~ ~' ~ A+ ~ ~, N O I..L ~~_ ~~ m ~ ~~ U ~OC3 }; ~ Q o ~, W ~~n ~ W a~ H _ U O ~ N ~ ~ W ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 W 0 ~ O .~ Q ~1 W w .-: W W W L W _~ I.L ca C (LS N U N N ~, w ~ ~i wo ~ N ~ ~ +-~ Q ~--+ ~ U ~ Q N ~ ~L L ~ ~ ~ ~ Q t~ O L .~ L Q .~ ~i ~--+ U Q N N .~ L.L (CS ~L a~ Q i~ `~"~ Q 0 0 ~Q ~~ ~~o ~~~ .~ .o .~- ca U O (6 O Q ~_ W N F- c 0 O (~ O _~ U 0 ca 0 N _~ U .~ O U co .~ .~ L O ~ N M ~..~..~ O O V m U w W °o N O U U U Ca O O ti ti 0 U O ~ Q ~~ `~ Cl ~ ~~ ~Qo C6 L V m U w W N O l.i Q N (/~ ~--+ ~--+ a~ i O 0 ~--+ .~ .~ ~--+ •L-+ ~-_+ N a~ Q ._ .~ W •L"-+ ~_ C O .~ .~ N N U N I C C~ a~ N ~--+ U N I a~ ~U N L O Q I ~~ ~Q © ~r ao ~~~ ~ ~ i N O (~ '~ ~- (n (~ _~ ~~~'~ ~~c~ ~ o ~ ~ ~L~~ ~~ ~ o ~ L V ~--+ Q ~~'~~ _ _ c ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ U ~ O ~ ~ ~ .~ L.L o C~c~~ m N U = U '~ ~o ~ W~ L cn w a~ a..~ ~ o > ~ Q ~- c~ L L ~L Q > ~ ~~ o~ a~ ~ N ~ -1--~ ~~ ~ U ~_ 'o U ~ a--i +~_' ca a--~ .~ N L ~~ ~ a, ~ o a~ ~ ~ ~ a--+ N ~L ~ U Q ~ O O L U ~ ~ .~ N ~ O ~ U O /~ ~ W i-+ W O O L ~~ ~ ~ ~ o N ~--+ O _~ .~ ~--+ L L ~_ .~ O ~--~ O ~ O ~ ~ Q L Q ~ •~ ,~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O O ~--+ .~ Q ~ .~ a~ O ~ ~ U ~ ~ ~ U ~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ U a~ .~ a--+ a--r L N O L .~ ~--~ O ~ _~ O o ~ N ~ ~ O O L C .~ .~ N C c~ ~a ~~ ~~ aao ~~~ C O ~ ~ U N N ~ ~ ~ U v ~ o ~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ •- N U ~ O Q ~ ~ .U I W ~ a~ ~ ~ N .O ~ ~ Q ~- w O ~ ~ C N ~ ~ ~ Uo a= ~ U }' U ~ ~> o ~ . N ~ UU ~ ~ I c a~ ~ ~ U ~ ~ W ~ ~ U ~ U L U ~ U ~ W W ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O O ~ ~ U ~ •~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ c ~~ U ~ o Q~ ~ ~ N +'' ~ gyp' U ~ ~ '- C ~ ~ OW ~ N ~ . O J U U ' ~~ ~ ~ Q ~ ~ w ' w . O O L~ U L W O N C O c W =~ w~ w w U 0 N N N a U U .~ U .~ .~ ~_ ~X N 0 a U Q U ~ ~= '~ U ~ o ~ "_ ~~ cn ~ -- ;~, O ~ ~ ,~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ,~ U ~ ~ ~ U ~ ~ ~ c ~ .~~ =L~~C~ ~ cap ~ DO ca ~ ~ ~ U ~ U ~ x~~° ~W ~o~~c~.~ 0 ~ ~ }' ° ~ ow ~ ca= ~N (~ w .~ ca 2 ~ ~ ~U W W L L L N ~ ~ O ~ O Q N Q ~ ~ , . ~ -F--+ L Q I..L ~--I O O J 2 C .O N Q .O (~ 0 N N ~U N L L /~L I1 ~--~ L Q. 2 ~'. U O .~ 0 4-- ~U L N O 0 0 ~w O -~, .~ .~ O U W .~ .~ _N W N C (~ Q ~--~ ~_ ~U W W L Q N .~ W (~ U .~ U ~~ •Q L Q U +r N N ~,~U N U ~ ~ •- N L N 0 i U Q N Q i O ~--~ . ; Q. N L N Q L ~--r 0 U M .~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o c ~ .~ Q .~ .~ N .Q Q CO +'i ~_ ~U ~~~ i N 0 0 ~w ~~ Rf .~ O C~ U W .~ .~ Q O 0 0 U N W w ~ O ~~•~ ~ ~ ~ V ~ .~ ~ ~ ~~q. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ W N ~ ° ~ ~_ co -~ ~~~ ~ ~U~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~•~ ~ ~ ° ~ ~ ~ ~ ~o~ c~ ~ a~ c~Lv ~~=cnoo~ SOU ~°~~ ~~ N .~ ~° V~ M C~ m ~ ~ a~ ~ ~ ° ~W ~ o ~~•~~°Q ~ ~ a~ 0 0 ~ °~ L ~ '~ ._ .~ U ~ C Q ~ ~ ~~ O ~ ~ ~ L ~~ -1--+ L m m W W W W 0 v~ v~ •= U • > ~--+ ,~ ~ ~`" N ~ ~- ,~ ~ ~ C ~ N O ~ O a--+ _~ r^ Q r N U m _~ ~ W Q ~ W .~ Uj ,~ O ~ O ~ ~ ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ OM ~ i ON i N ~ .O N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ +~ O ~ ~ ~ O ~ M ~ O `~ O uj ~ N QW ~ ~ ~ N m ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ D U ~ ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ Q ~ ~ W ~ ~ ~ N ~ ~ O O 00 Q. ~ >, ~ ~ NO O N O N Q O N ~ cn ~ ~ N ~ ~ ~+-- _ ~_ i 4- a--' o -~ ° ~ = I- - W ~ W v N ~ Q D ~~ Q (a Q N ~ P528 STAFF REPORT - PLANNING DEP_1RTMENT ~~Yj-.~ f RANCHO Date: June 3, 2009 CUCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager From: James R. Troyer, AICP, Planning Director By: Adam Collier, Planning Technician Subject: REQUEST TO INITIATE DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DRC2009-00414 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA: A request to amend the text for Development Code Sections 17.02 (Administration), 17.08 (Residential Districts), 17.10 (CommerciallOffice Districts), 17.12 (Parking Regulations), and 17.30 (Industrial Districts) to add a definition and standards for Community Gardens. Staff has determined that the project is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Section 15061(b)(3). RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council approve the request to initiate a Development Code Amendment to amend the text of Development Code Sections 17.02 (Administration), 17.08 (Residential Districts), 17.10 (Commercial/Office Districts), 17.12 (Parking Regulations), and 17.30 (Industrial Districts) to include a definition and provide standards for Community Gardens). BACKGROUND: Due to growing public interest and the creation of multiple community gardens in cities throughout California, staff is requesting to initiate a Development Code Amendment to amend the text of Development Code Sections 17.02 (Administration),17.08 (Residential Districts), 17.10 (Commercial/Office Districts), 17.12 (Parking Regulations), and 17.30 (Industrial Districts) to include a definition and to provide standards for Community Gardens. The allowance of Community Gardens in residential and commercial zones, pursuant to standards and regulations for their use, will further the goals of the General Plan update and Healthy RC program by providing local residents the opportunity to grow and purchase more healthy foods and vegetables within their own community. Currently, the City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Code only permits Community Gardens in Open Space Districts, with on-site sales of products grown on the site also allowed. No provision is currently provided in the Residential or Commercial/Office Districts to permit the operation of a Community Garden. Second, the Development Code does not provide any standards (e.g. setbacks, parking, etc.) for how a Community Garden should be operated in order to limit potential nuisance impacts to surrounding uses. ANALYSIS: A "Community Garden" can be defined as a site used for growing plants for food, fiber, herbs and/or flowers, which is shared and maintained by community residents. The methods for permitting this P529 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT DRC2009-00414-CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA June 3, 2009 PAGE2 use, as well as ensuring long term maintenance of a community garden vary by municipality. See Table 1 for an analysis of various municipalities and their formal methods of permitting/maintaining Community Gardens: Table 1 Ci Permitted Zones Maintenance City of Sunnyvale Conditional Use Permit in any Maintenance Agreement with Residential District Non-Profit Or anization City of Turlock Conditional Use Permit in any Conditions of Approval Residential District Require HOA Maintenance via modif in the CC&R's City of Citrus Heights Permitted outright in any Municipal Code Property Residential District Maintenance Standards City of Napa Conditional Use Permit most Conditions of Approval districts all Residential Districts City of Ojai Permitted on City-owned City Public Works crew does Pro ert maintenance as necessa The most popular method is to allow Community Gardens on public property and facilitate operation through a Recreation Department. Maintenance could be ensured through a contract agreement with anon-profit or other organization, or use City Public Works crews to maintain as required. The Recreation Department would be responsible for establishing rules for operation, as well as ensuring maintenance of the garden occurs via a contract agreement or City maintenance crews. A second approach would be to permit Community Gardens in residential, open space, and other zoning districts on private property as permitted or conditionally permitted uses. A Community Garden could be defined as a permitted use by providing general development and performance standards, or simply referring to property maintenance standards. By requiring a Conditional Use Permit (CUP), the City may add more specific and stringent Conditions of Approval to ensure. better operational standards and limit potential nuisance impacts to adjacent uses. A CUP also allows the City to review each application on a case by case basis and notify adjacent property owners of the proposed application. Finally, if the proposed Community Garden is within an HOA, the City could require that the HOA modify its CC&R's to identify and maintain the Community Garden upon approval of a Conditional Use Permit. See Table 2 below for a summary of the various regulatory mechanisms that a city can use in permitting and ensuring long-term maintenance of a Community Garden: P530 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT DRC2009-00414 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA June 3, 2009 Takla 2 PAGE 3 Property Ownership Land Use Permit Required Maintenance Options Public Conditional Use Permit 1) City maintained or 2) Contract with non-profit or other Permitted Use organization 3 Conditions of A royal on CUP Private Conditional Use Permit 1) Conditions of Approval on CUP or 2) Municipal Code Property Permitted Use Maintenance Standards 3) HOA maintenance via modif in the CCBR's Respectfully submitted, ~~~~~ Jam R. Troyer, AICP Planning Director JRT/AC/Is R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A RANCH 0 C U C A M O N G A P O L I C E Staff Report TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Joe Cusimano, Chief of Police, Rancho Cucamonga Police DATE: June 3, 2009 SUBJECT: REPORT ON $35,000.00 OF STATE SEIZED ASSETS APPROVED BY THE SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY GOVERNING ASSET SEIZURE BOARD TO SUPPORT AND FUND PROJECT C.A.N.I.N.E. (CAMPUS AWARENESS, NARCOTIC INTERVENTION, NARCOTIC EDUCATION) UTILIZING CANINES FOR NARCOTIC DETECTION SERVICES AND EDUCATIONAL) PROGRAM. FUNDS SHALL BE APPROPRIATED FROM STATE ASSET SEZURE FUND 196 AND AWARDED TO THE CHAFFEY JOINT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DRISTRICT. RECOMMENDATION It is the collective mission of the Chaffey Joint Union High School District and the Rancho Cucamonga Police Department to provide every student a safe and productive learning environment. In doing so, a $35,000.00 disbursement is to be awarded to the Chaffey Joint Union High School District to fund project C.A.N.I.N.E. (Campus Awareness, Narcotic Intervention, Narcotic Education) utilizing canines for Narcotic Detection Services and Educational Programs. The project is currently pending board approval from Chaffey School Board scheduled for mid-June, 2009. BACKGROUND ANALYSIS Narcotic asset forfeiture monies are received through Federal and State Asset Seizure Laws. It is the responsibility of the city's Auditor/Controller Department to maintain these funds and conduct periodic audits of all asset seizure funds. Under Health and Safety Code Section 11489(b)(2)(i), 15% of the Departments share of state proceeds from assets seized shall be used exclusively to fund programs designed to combat drug abuse and divert gang activity. This is only required by State Asset Seizure Laws and not Federal. P531 P532 Under Health and Safety Code Section 11489(b)(2)(i), funds shall be awarded to programs designed to combat drug usage and divert gang activity and shall involve educators, parents, local businesses and community-based organizations. The distribution of funds shall be determined by a Governing Board which includes the Chief of Police, the counties Sheriff, District Attorney and Chief Probation Officer. This is done through proposals submitted to fund programs which meet the requirements of Health and Safety Code Section 11489(b)(2)(i). On behalf of the Chaffey Joint Union High School a proposal was submitted to the San Bernardino County Governing Asset Seizure Board requesting the disbursement of $35,000.00 to fund their C.A.N.I.N.E. (Campus Awareness, Narcotic Intervention, Narcotic Education) Program. Through this program a contract service will be provided by Interquest Detection Dog Services providing narcotic trained canines to be utilized on school campuses detecting and preventing narcotics from entering school grounds. They shall also provide educational training to students on the hazards of drug usage. FISCAL IMPACT None. Adequate funding is available within the State Asset Seizure California Drug and Prevention 15% Fund. CONCLUSION State asset seizure funds in 196-State Asset Seizure California Drug and Gang Prevention 15% shall be utilized to fund the C.A.N.I.N.E. Project. Respectfu Chief of Police -2- P533 T H E C I T Y O F RANCHO CUCAMONGA Staff Report DATE: June 3, 2009 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: John R. Gillison, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Servi~ BY: Ingrid Y. Bruce, GIS/Special Districts Manager SUBJECT: APPROVAL TO MAINTAIN LEVY FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-2 (DRAINAGE AND LAW ENFORCEMENT) WITH NO INCREASE TO THE CURRENT RATE. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached Resolution setting the annual special tax for Community Facilities District No. 88-2 (Drainage and Law Enforcement). Pursuant to Section 53340 and 53358 of the Government Code Mello-Roos Community Facilities District Act of 1982, the City Council is authorized to annually levy the tax rate to pay debt service on the bonds. There is no increase to the current rate for fiscal yeaz 2009/2010. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS On June 21, 1989, the City Council approved the formation of Community Facilities District No. 88-2 for Drainage Capital Facilities and Law Enforcement services and authorized the annual levy of special taxes to pay debt service on the bonds and cover the costs of police operations and maintenance. The special tax levied annually for drainage facilities is listed as Special Tax A -Drainage Facilities. On April 7, 1994, City Council approved Resolution No. 94-058, authorizing the issuance of bonds. On June 3, 1999, City Council adopted Resolution No. 99-127 authorizing the refunding of special tax bonds for this district. The refunding bonds were issued in July 1999 in the amount of $2,705,000. The special tax was set at 91% of the maximum rate when the district was formed for the developed property. However, the authorized bond refunding adjusted the rate to 78% of the maximum special tax for the developed and undeveloped property. The collections from the annual levy will be used to pay debt service through the life of the bonds. P534 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT CFD NO. 88-2 (DRAINAGE AND LAW ENFORCEMENT) June 3, 2009 Page 2 The levy of special taxes annually for the Law Enforcement services is listed in Special Tax B - Law Enforcement. When the City receives the collections, the funds for Special Tax B -Law Enforcement aze transferred to the General Fund to offset the Law Enforcement costs. Special Tax A -Drainage Facilities Residential Class I (3590+ S.F.) Residential Class II (3077-3589 S.F.) Residential Class III (2564-3076 S.F.) Residential Class IV (2308-2563 S.F.) Residential Class V (2051-2307 S.F.) Residential Class VI (Less than 2051 S.F.) Undeveloped Property Special Tax B -Law Enforcement Residential Class I (3590 + S.F) Residential Class II (3077-3587 S.F.) Residential Class III (2564-3076 S.F.) Residential Class ]V (2308-2563 S.F.) Residential Class V (2051-2307 S.F.) Residential Class VI (Less than 2051 S.F.) Attachments: Resolution Exhibit "A" Map $735 $544 $408 $326 $272 $190 $1,190/acre $1.00 $1.00 $1.00 $1.00 $1.00 $1.00 -2- P535 RESOLUTION NO. ©q- ~ ~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RE-ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-2 (DRAINAGE AND LAW ENFORCEMENT) WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, (hereinafter referred to as the "legislative body of the local Agency"), has initiated proceedings, held a public hearing, conducted an election and received a favorable vote from the qualified electors relating to the levy of a special tax in a Community Facilities District, all as authorized pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982", being Chapter 2.5, Part 1, Division 2, Title 5 of the Government Code for the State of California. This Community Facilities District shall hereinafter be referred to as COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-2 (Drainage and Law Enforcement) (hereinafter referred to as the "District"); and WHEREAS, at this time, bonds have been authorized for purposes of financing the project facilities for said District; and WHEREAS, this legislative body, by Ordinance as authorized by Section 53340 of the Government Code of the State of California, has authorized the levy of a special tax to pay for costs and expenses related to said Community Facilities District, and this legislative body is desirous to establish the specific rate of the special tax to be collected for the next fiscal yeaz. NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the above recitals aze all true and correct. SECTION 2: That the specific rate and amount of the special tax to be collected to pay for the costs and expenses for the next Fiscal Year 2009-2010 for the referenced district is hereby determined and established as set forth in the attached, referenced and incorporated Exhibit "A". SECTION 3: That the rate as set forth above does not exceed the amount as previously authorized by Ordinance of this legislative body, and is not in excess of that as previously approved by the qualified electors of the District. P536 SECTION 4: That the proceeds of the special tax aze used to pay, in whole or in pazt, the costs of the following, in the following order of priority: A. Payment of principal of and interest on any outstanding authorized bonded indebtedness. B. Necessary replenishment of bond reserve funds or other reserve funds; C. Payment of costs and expenses of authorized public facilities and public services. D. Repayment of advances and loans, if appropriate. The proceeds of the special taxes shall be used as set forth above, and shall not be used for any other purpose. SECTION 5: The special tax shall be collected in the same manner as ordinary ad valorem property taxes aze collected, and shall be subject to the same penalties and same procedure and sale in cases of any delinquency for ad valorem taxes, and the Tax Collector is hereby authorized to deduct reasonable administrative costs incurred in collecting any said special tax. SECTION 6: All monies above collected shall be paid into the Community Facilities District funds, including any bond fund and reserve fund. SECTION 7: The Auditor of the County is hereby directed to enter in the next county assessment roll on which taxes will become due, opposite each lot or pazcel of land effected in a space marked "public improvements, special tax", or by any other suitable designation, the installment of the special tax, and for the exact rate and amount of said tax, reference is made to the attached Exhibit "A". SECTION 8: The County Auditor shall then, at the close of the tax collection period, promptly render to this Agency a detailed report showing the amount and/or amounts of such special tax installments, interest, penalties and percentages so collected and from what property collected, and also provide a statement of any percentages retained for the expense of making any such collection. P537 PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of June 2009. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: Donald J. Kurth, M.D., Mayor ATTEST: Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk I, JANICE C. REYNOLDS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Califomia, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the day of June 2009. Executed this day of June 2009, at Rancho Cucamonga, Califomia. Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk P538 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT N0.88-2 EXHIBIT "A" The Resolution establishing the annual special tax refers to this Exhibit for an explanation of the rate and method of apportionment of the Special Taxes for Fiscal Yeaz 2009/2010. SPECIAL TAX "A" -DRAINAGE FACILITIES PROPERTY CATEGORIES There are two categories of property subject to the levy of Special Tax "A", which aze identified as follows: DEVELOPED PROPERTY All property identified as a single Tax Assessor's parcel for which property a building permit has been issued as of May 31 of any yeaz. 2. UNDEVELOPED PROPERTY All other property, excluding property which, as of the date of the election to authorize the levy of Special Tax "A:, is: (i) owned by a public entity; (ii) owned by a regulated public utility and being utilized for transmission or distribution purposes; or (iii) zoned as open space. TAXING CLASSIFICATIONS AND SPECIAL TAX "A" RATES The taxing classifications for the above Property Categories and the authorized Special Tax "A" rates for Fiscal Yeaz 2009/2010 aze as follows: P539 Taxine Classification Tax Rate 1. DEVELOPED PROPERTY A. Residential Class I $735 per yeaz (More than 3,590 squaze feet of dwelling unit living azea) B. Residential II $544 per yeaz (3,077-3,589 squaze feet of dwelling unit living area) C. Residential III $408 per yeaz (2,564-3,076 square feet of dwelling unit living azea) D. Residential Class IV $326 per year (2,308-2,563 square feet of dwelling unit living azea) E. Residential Class V $272 per yeaz (2,051-2,307 square feet of dwelling unit living azea) F. Residential Class VI $190 per yeaz (Less than 2,051 square feet of dwelling unit living azea) 2. UNDEVELOPED PROPERTY All Undeveloped Property $1,190 per acre per yeaz ** P540 The squaze footage of dwelling unit living azea shall mean the squaze footage of internal living space, exclusive of gazages and other structures not used as living space, as shown on the building permit(s) issued for the dwelling unit. * * The acreage of an Undeveloped Property shall be the gross acreage exclusive of any acreage dedicated or offered for dedication to a public agency. METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT OF SPECIAL TAX "A" Special Tax "A" shall be levied annually on all taxable property within one of the above identified Property Categories so long as Special Tax "A" revenues aze necessary to pay authorized expenses of the Community Facilities District related to the financing of authorized public facilities, which may include, without limitation, payment of debt service on any bonded indebtedness of the Community Facilities District; replenishment of any required reserve fund for any such bonded indebtedness; funding of any required sinking fund necessary to pay for future public facilities or debt service; or direct payment for public facilities (CFD Expenses"). The annual lery of Special Tax "A" shall be apportioned as follows: STEP 1: The Community Facilities District shall estimate the amount of CFD Expenses which must be paid for from Special Tax "A" revenues collected during the Fiscal Yeaz for which the Special Tax "A" lery is to be established (the "Required Special Tax "A" Revenue"). STEP 2: That equal percentage of the Special Tax "A" rate, not to exceed 78% ofthe maximum authorized Special Tax "A" rate, applicable to all Developed Property Taxing Classifications necessary to generate Special Tax "A" revenue in the Fiscal Yeaz of the levy equal to the Required Special Tax "A" Revenue for such Fiscal Yeaz shall be levied on all Developed Property. STEP 3: If additional Special Tax "A" revenues aze still necessary to generate the Required Special Tax "A" Revenue, that percentage of the maximum authorized Special Tax "A" rate applicable to all Undeveloped Property necessary to generate such additional Special Tax "A" revenue shall be levied on all Undeveloped Property. P541 STEP 4: If additional Special Tax "A" revenues aze still necessary to generate the Required Special Tax "A" Revenue, that equal percentage of the maximum authorized Special Tax "A" rate applicable to all Developed Property Taxing Classifications necessary to generate such additional Special Tax "A" revenue shall be levied on all Developed Property. STEP 5: If additional Special Tax "A" revenues are still necessary to generate the Required Special Tax "A" Revenue, the Community Facilities District shall: A. Compare (i) the Special Tax "A" rate which would be levied on each Developed Property combining STEP 2 and STEP 4 above with (ii) the product resulting from multiplying the squaze footage of the Developed Property times the Base Maximum Special Tax "A". The Base Maximum Special Tax "A" means an amount equal to $0.054 per square foot of the lot or pazcel. B. If the product described in (ii) above exceeds the Special Tax "A" rate described in (i) above for any Developed Property, the Community Facilities District shall. increase the Special Tax "A" rate levied on each such Developed Property in equal percentages up to the rate not to exceed the product described in (ii) above necessary to generate the additional Special Tax "A" revenues to equal the Required Special Tax "A" Revenues. P542 SPECIAL TAX "B" -LAW ENFORCEMENT All Developed Property shall be subject to the levy of Special Tax "B". The authorized Special Tax "B" rates for Fiscal Yeaz 2009/20010 aze as follows: Taxing Classification Tax Rate 1. DEVELOPED PROPERTY A. Residential Class I $1.00 per yeaz (More than 3,590 square feet of dwelling unit living azea) B. Residential Class II $1.00 per yeaz (3,077-3,589 square feet of dwelling unit living area) C. Residential Class III $1.00 per yeaz (2,564-3,076 square feet of dwelling unit living azea) D. Residential Class IV $1.00 per yeaz (2,308-2,563 squaze feet of dwelling unit living area) E. Residential Class V $1.00 per yeaz (2,051-2,307 square feet of dwelling unit living area) F. Residential Class VI $1.00 per year (Less than 2,051 squaze feet of dwelling unit living azea) P543 N N °' /0/~0~ K/ N `1~1 •~ N V J ~ ~ r Q ~ U U u~ 0 H d rX'~ y ~ ~ ~ o ~ pNo ~\ N .~ C _ O .= J m ~ V ~ N L 1 m j $ Q •\ I i L V ~ ~ ny ep ® ny epueml33 ! 1 V ~8 ~aa~~.. e4 .._. _. . j ny ~a~sayooa ny ~alsayooa r"' i r.._.._.._.._. ny ua~!II!W ny ua~lll!W j i i i ny uaneH • ny uaneH i i ny esow~aH j ny esow~aH i ny pleq!yo~y; nH Pleq!yo~d 1 ! a ~ ny uewllaH ny uewllaH i t ~~ L i r' L a ! ny p eRauln ! ~. c$a$F~I33~yay F~ 'M'•• ~ ••'~* e~ll!'~ga8!~ • .•''• in ~ m ~ cn s2~-2 •~•, a. ~~~n2 1.. j......1... .. _.._..~•'_~ rn NL. a °~ ~~~~p Sip~e~j ~ ¢¢ 33 • V ~ ~ O Q €i 285~~~~~'e !r c m LL pi 1 $i ~[ a c sP~l~~€('~it °x~ _ ~!~§ga83~i~~8 s~ F~,U£ 3Lif U ELPt IiE a~. si R A N C U O C U C A M O N G A Staff Report DATE: June 3, 2009 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: John R. Gillison, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Serv BY: Ingrid Y. Bruce, GIS/Special Districts Manager SUBJECT: APPROVAL TO SET ANNUAL BENEFIT ASSESSMENTS FOR DRAINAGE AREA NO. 91-2 (DAY CANYON DRAINAGE BASIN) WITH NO INCREASE TO THE CURRENT RATE. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached Resolution setting an annual benefit assessment levy for the maintenance and/or servicing of a drainage channel within Drainage Area No. 91-2 (Day Canyon Drainage Basin). There is no increase to the current rate for fiscal year 2009/2010. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS On November 6, 1991, City Council adopted Resolution No. 91-331 for the annual levy of benefit assessments for the maintenance and/or servicing of a 27+ acre-foot desilting basin and a 1,460+ linear foot concrete drainage channel within Drainage Area No. 91-2, Day Canyon Drainage Basin area. Drainage Area No. 91-2 was adeveloper-initiated district. Protection of the properties from the overland flows was necessary in order to receive development rights from the City. The costs associated with the maintenance of this district are passed onto the property owners, as they receive special and direct benefit that is distinguishable from the other property owners that are outside the boundary. There aze 351 single-family homes within this boundary that receive this benefit. The total annual cost for maintenance is thirty-two thousand, three hundred and fifty- one dollars and sixty-seven cents ($32,351.67) for a total cost to each home of ninety-two dollars and seventeen cents ($92.17) P544 P545 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT DRAINAGE AREA NO. 91-2 (DAY CANYON DRAINAGE BASIN) June 3, 2009 Page 2 Attachments: Resolution Annual Supplement to Final Engineer's Report Map -2- p P546 RESOLUTION NO. ©9-~~% A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DETERMINING THE COST OF SERVICE TO BE FINANCED BY BENEFIT ASSESSMENTS TO BE LEVIED IN DRAINAGE AREA N0.91-2 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2009-2010 AND DETERMINING AND IMPOSING SUCH BENEFIT ASSESSMENTS WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, previously undertook proceedings to authorize the levy and imposition of benefit assessments to pay for the annual drainage maintenance, including the removal of sediment and debris from the Day Canyon Channel improvements and basin, pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Benefit Assessment Act of 1982", being Chapter 6.4, Division 2, Title 5 of the Government Code of the State of California (commencing with Section 54703), said azea of benefit being known and designated as DRAINAGE AREA NO. 91-2 (the "Drainage Area"); and WHEREAS, at this time there has been presented to this City Council a Supplemental Report (the "Supplemental Report") to the Final Engineer's Report Drainage Area No. 91-2 City ofRancho Cucamonga setting forth a description of the proposed service, cost estimate and assessment schedule for fiscal yeaz 2009-2010 (the "Final Engineer's Report"); and WHEREAS, at this time this City Council desires to determine the cost of providing authorized services to be financed by the levy of a benefit assessment for fiscal yeaz 2009-2010 and to determine and impose such benefit assessment. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby resolve as follows: SECTION 1: That the above recitals aze all true and correct. SECTION 2: That the Supplemental Report is hereby approved and ordered to be kept on file in the Office of the City Clerk as a permanent record and to remain open for public inspection. Said Supplemental Report generally consists of the following: A. A description of the service proposed to be fmanced through revenue derived through the levy and collection of the benefit assessment; B. A description of each lot or parcel of property proposed to be subject to the benefit assessment; C. The amount of the proposed assessment for each parcel. P547 SECTION 3: That the rate and method of apportionment of the benefit assessment as set forth in the Final Engineer's Report is hereby adopted and has been utilized as the rate and method of apportionment of the benefit assessment to be levied in fiscal yeaz 2009-2010. SECTION 4: That this City Council hereby determines and orders that the benefit assessments described in the Supplemental Report within the Drainage Area aze hereby confirmed and levied for fiscal year 2009-2010. SECTION 5: That the above confirmed and levied benefit assessment for fiscal yeaz 2009- 2010shall becollected at the same time and in the same manner as general County property taxes aze collected and all laws providing for the collection and enforcement of such County taxes shall be applicable to the collection and enforcement of these benefit assessments. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED day of June 2009. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: ATTEST: Donald J. Kurth, M.D., Mayor Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk I, JANICE C. REYNOLDS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the day of June 2009. Executed this day of June 2009 at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk P548 ANNUAL SUPPLEMENT TO FINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT DRAINAGE AREA N0.91-2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Donald J. Kurth, M.D., Mayor L. Dennis Michael, Mayor Pro Tem Rex Gutierrez, Councihnember Sam Spagnolo, Councilmember Diane Williams, Councilmember Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk Mazk Steuer, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer JUNE 2009 P549 ANNUAL SUPPLEMENT TO FINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT DRAINAGE AREA N0.91-2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA TABLE OF CONTENTS Engineer's Report Exhibit A - Description of Service Exhibit B -Cost Estimate Exhibit C -Assessment Schedule Map P550 AGENCY: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PROJECT: DRAINAGE AREA NO. 91-2 TO: CITY COUNCIL CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STATE OF CALIFORNIA ANNUAL SUPPLEMENT TO FINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT PURSUANT TO BENEFTI' ASSESSMENT ACT OF 1982 This Annual Supplement to the Final Engineer's Report (the "Annual Supplement's for City of Rancho Cucamonga Drainage Area No. 91-2 is hereby submitted consisting of the following documents, pursuant to the provisions of the Benefit Assessment Act of 1982, being Chapter 6.4, Division 2, Title 5 of the Government Code of the State of California, commencing with Section 54703. This Annual Supplement is applicable for the ensuing 12-month period, being the fiscal veaz commencing July 1, 2009 to June 30, 2010. 1. DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE (Exhibit "A"): A description of the service proposed to be financed through revenue derived from the levy and collection of the annual benefit assessment. 2. COST ESTIMATE (Exhibit "B"): A listing of all costs and expenses for the next fiscal yeaz, including incidental expenses. 3. BENEFIT ASSESSMENT SCHEDULE (Exhibit "C"): The annual assessment schedule, setting forth the following: A. Annual Benefit Assessment: The amount ofthe proposed benefit assessment for each parcel. B. Description of Parcel: A description of each lot or parcel of property proposed to be subject to the benefit assessment, said parcel being described by the County Assessor's pazcel number. P551 No benefit assessments shall be imposed or levied upon land owned by a Federal or State governmental agency and/or any other local agency. Any utility property and right-of--way shall be subject to assessment only to the extent that it is specifically benefited from the proposed services. Reference is made to the Final Engineer's Report as incorporated in Resolution No. 91-331 for a description of the boundaries of the Drainage Area and each parcel therein and for the method of spreading the benefit assessment. Executed this day of June 2009, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. DIRECTOR OF ENGINEERING SERVICES/CITY ENGINEER CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STATE OF CALIFORNIA By: Final approval, confirmation, and levy of the annual benefit assessment and all matters in the Annual Supplement were made on the day of June 2009, by adoption of Resolution No. by the City Council. CITY CLERK CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STATE OF CALIFORNIA A copy of said Assessment Roll and Engineer's Report was filed in the Office of the City Engineer and the City Clerk on the day of June 2009. CITY CLERK CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STATE OF CALIFORNIA DIIiECTOR OF ENGINEERING SERVICES/CITY ENGINEER CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STATE OF CALIFORNIA P552 EXHIBIT A DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE The properties within Drainage Area No. 91-2 are located within the boundaries of the Day Canyon Drainage Basin area. Protection of the properties within the district from overland flows requires the construction of a 27+ acre-foot desilting basin and a 1,460+ linear foot concrete drainage channel. The channel improvements will intercept the overland flows prior to reaching the properties and carry the storm water runoff, sediment, trash, organic material, and related debris to a desilting basin. Each year the sediment, trash, organic material, and other related debris that accumulates in the desilting basin and channel must be removed and transported to an approved spoils site. The services proposed to be financed from the revenue derived from the levy and collections of the annual benefit assessment aze as follows: A. Monthly on-site inspections of the desilting basin and channel. B. Bi-monthly weed abatement program for the desilting basin and channel. C. Removal of accumulated sediment, trash, organic material, and other related debris from the desilting basin and channel to an approved spoils site. This service is expected to be provided annually. During times of excessive rainfall, this service may be required more frequently. P553 A. B. C. D EXHIBIT B COST ESTIMATE FISCAL YEAR 2009-2010 Cost of Annual Maintenance Desilting Basin $33 187 Channel 14 223 Subtotal $47,410 Incidental Expenses City Administration 5 030 Subtotal $ 5,030 Total Annual Costs $52,440 Contribution/FundBalance ($20,188) E. Balance to Assessment $32,252 P554 EXIIIBIT C ASSESSMENT SCHEDULE WHEREAS, this City Council has previously, pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Benefit Assessment Act of 1982", being Chapter 6.4, Division 2, Title 5 of the Government Code of the State of California, commencing with Section 54703, formed Drainage Area No. 91-2 all in accordance with the provisions of said Act; and, WHEREAS, the Annual Supplement for Fiscal Year 2009-2010 consisting of certain documentation (including the amount of the proposed assessment for each parcel, a description of the parcel and a description of the service proposed to be provided) has now been prepared. NOW, THEREFORE, the Deputy City Manager/Community Development, by virtue of the power vested pursuant to said Act and by order of the legislative body, hereby makes and recommends the following benefit assessment to cover the costs and expenses of the service proposed to be financed through the levy of assessments and revenue derived for the fiscal year 2009-2010. Said costs and expenses are generally as follows: Personnel Salaries $47,410 Cost of Improvements $ 0 Incidental Expenses 5 030 Total Costs $52,440 Contribution/Fund Balance 20 188 Balance to Assessment $32,352 I do hereby assess and apportion the total amount of the costs and expenses upon the several parcels of land within the area ofbenefit in proportion to the estimated benefits received, and hereby Further state as follows: A. The amount ofbenefit assessment imposed is specifically related to the benefit ofthe parcel, which will be derived from the provision of the service to be provided. B. The annual aggregate amount of the total benefit assessment does not exceed the estimated annual cost of providing the service. C. The revenue derived from the benefit assessment shall not be used to pay for the cost of any service other than the service for which the benefit assessment was levied. P555 The assessment parcels herein refer to the County Assessment Roll for a description of the lots or pazcels, and said Roll shall govern for all details concerning the description of the lots or parcels. The net amount to be assessed upon the ]ands has been spread and apportioned by formula as set forth in the Final Engineer's Report in accordance with the benefits received from each pazcel, and in my opinion, said costs and expenses have been apportioned in direct relationship to the benefits received from the maintenance works of improvement. In the opinion of the undersigned, the benefit assessments have been spread and apportioned in accordance with the benefits to be received from the proposed work and services. Dated: DIIZECTOR OF ENGINEERING SERVICES/CITY ENGINEER CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STATE OF CALIFORNIA ASSESSMENT PROPERTY AMOUNT OF NUMBER DESCRIPTION ASSESSMENT 0225-451-O1 to 35 351 $32,352.00 0225-451-39 to 46, 49,50,53 Residential 0225-451-55 to 62, 64 Pazcels 0225-462-01 to 07 0225-462-12 to 17 0225-463-03, 06 to 33 0225-464-01 to 04, 06, 07 0225-464-19 to 30 0225-471-O1 to 58 0225-481-01 to 42 0225-491-Olto 19 0225-561-01 to 34 0225-571-O1 to 35 0225-581-01 to 38 0225-681-O1 to 03 0225-681-OS to 11 Total $32,352.00 P556 N d ~~ y,,, N •E a - '= J Q r rr a m ~ Q ~ U ,o o N c ~ ICY ~~ +~ ~ ~ O ~ p N O r J m ~ y i ~ ~ m L 3 ° h , ~° a` h ~ _.._.._ i nb' ise3 in Q i ® ~ t v ny ep ny epuemg3 ~ i ! G1 m aaJ e ~e ~I ~ a . ._. .._ .._ _ ; ny Ja;sayooa ny Ja;sayooa r"' i _.._.._ ny ua~!II!W ~ .._.. ny ua~!II!W i i i ny uaneH ; ny uaneH ! i ny esowJaH ~ ny esowJaH i ny pleq!yoJy : nH PIeQ!4oJb' ! ! ny uewllaH ny uewllaH i ~~ ~ ' m • 1 t •f r c ny pJe~Cauln ~ ~ ue awe ~ Fp€-€EfE~€°5a€ ° ' ~ i 4 ll ~ 3S ! ~. j f f ~. t tf =gx~ F 57 a ~ ~ g~ ~ L •~~~'• ~ C m m ~5~~ 3 g~4'6 ~ .~ .~ : • f• L J O> N - ~ ~ O 'L"' aD { § f ~~'~ E xi @4 f$ $ . fix. _.._.. _..i 1.._..~ _.. ~ ~ ~ O Q {~ q ~.p ~~£A ~ E ~ c m u. 4 fE o~ 4i;~taloa N >. h 6gppggppg ~~~xl! f 4S~ ~ j ~a ~ m ~0 2 ~ Eg dg8 i~~l ' ~xy2 ~U i a s ~ t~ ~ P 3E ~s$:i e P557 T H E C I T Y O F R A N G M O C U C A M O N G A Staff Report DATE: June 3, 2009 TO: Mayor and members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Managers-, p~ FROM: John R. Gillison, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Ser~~~e~, )\ BY: Ingrid Y. Bruce, GIS/Special Districts Manager~,y/j SUBJEC'P: APPROVAL TO SET ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 93-3 (FOOTHILL MARKETPLACE) WITH NO INCREASE TO THE CURRENT RATE. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached Resolution setting an annual special tax levy of $14,369 an acre per parcel to dischazge bond obligations in Community Facilities District No. 93-3 (Foothill Marketplace). Pursuant to Section 53340 and 53358 of the Government Code Mello-Roos Community Facilities District Act of 1982, the City Council is authorized to annually levy the tax rate to pay debt service on the bonds. There is no increase from the current tax rate for fiscal yeaz 2009/2010. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS On December 1, 1993, an election was held and the property owners within the boundary of Community Facilities District No. 93-3 (Foothill Mazketplace) authorized the district to incur bonded indebtedness in the principal amount of $4,825,000. On December 15, 1993, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 518 authorizing the levy of a special tax in the district. Bonds were issued on Mazch 15, 1994, for the purpose of financing the acquisition of certain public improvements that aze required for and will permit the development of the properties within the district. On June 3, 1999, City Council adopted resolution No. 99-127 authorizing the refunding of special tax bonds for this district. The refunding bonds were issued in July, 1999 in the amount of $4,525,000. P558 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT CFD NO. 93-3 (FOOTHILL MARKETPLACE) June 3, 2009 Page 2 While the property owners within the district approved the maximum rate for the special tax at $20,000 per acre, the tax rate that is needed to meet obligations for fiscal yeaz 2009/2010 is adjusted downward to $14,369 per acre. This special tax shall be levied as long as necessary for each pazcel of taxable property to pay for the facilities and to discharge bond obligations through the life of the bonds. Attachments: Resolution Annual Status Report Map 2- P559 RESOLUTION NO. ©'7'I ~ D A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RE-ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT N0.93-3 (FOOTHILL MARKETPLACE) WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Califomia, (hereinafter refereed to as the "legislative body of the local Agency"), has initiated proceedings, held a public hearing, conducted an election and received a favorable vote from the qualified electors relating to the levy of a special tax in a Community Facilities District, all as authorized pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Mello Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982", being Chapter 2.5, Part 1, Division 2, Title 5 of the Government Code for the State of California. This Community Facilities District shall hereinafter be referred to as COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 93-3 (FOOTHILL MARKETPLACE) (hereinafter referred to as the "District"); and WHEREAS, at this time, bonds have been authorized for purposes of financing the project facilities for said District; and WHEREAS, this legislative body, by Ordinance as authorized by Section 53340 of the Government Code of the State of Califomia, has authorized the levy of a special tax to pay for costs and expenses related to said Community Facilities District, and this legislative body is desirous to establish the specific rate of the special tax to be collected for the next fiscal year. NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct SECTION 2: That the specific rate and amount of the special tax to be collected to pay for the costs and expenses for the next fiscal year 2009-2010 for the referenced district is hereby determined and established as set forth in the attached, referenced and incorporated in the Annual Status Report. SECTION 3: That the rate as set forth above does not exceed the amount as previously authorized by Ordinance of this legislative body, and is not in excess of that as previously approved by the qualified electors of the District. SECTION 4: That the proceeds of the special tax shall be used to pay, in whole or in part, the costs of the following, in the following order of priority: P560 Resolution No. A. Payment of principal of and interest on any outstanding authorized bonded indebtedness; B. Necessary replenishment of bond reserve funds or other reserve funds; C. Payment of costs and expenses of authorized public facilities and public services, and incidental expenses pursuant to the Act; and D. Repayment of advances and loans, if appropriate. The proceeds of the special taxes shall be used as set forth above, and shall not be used for any other purpose. SECTION 5: The special tax shall be collected in the same manner as ordinary ad valorem property taxes are collected, and shall be subject to the same penalties and same procedure and sale in cases of any delinquency for ad valorem taxes, and the Tax Collector is hereby authorized to deduct reasonable administrative costs incurred in collecting any said special tax. SECTION 6: All monies above collected shall be paid into the Community Facilities District funds, including any bond fund and reserve fund. SECTION 7: The Auditor of the County is hereby directed to enter in the next county assessment roll on which taxes will become due, opposite each lot or pazcel of land effected in a space marked "public improvements, special tax", or by any other suitable designation, the installment of the special tax, and for the exact rate and amount of said tax, reference is made to the attached Annual Status Report. SECTION 8: The County Auditor shall then, at the close of the tax collection period, promptly render to this Agency a detailed report showing the amount and/or amounts of such special tax installments, interest, penalties and percentages so collected and from what property collected, and also provide a statement of any percentages retained for the expense of making any such collection. P561 Resolution No. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of June 2009. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: Donald J. Kurth, M.D., Mayor ATTEST: Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk I, JANICE C. REYNOLDS, CITY CLERK ofthe City of Rancho Cucamonga, Califomia, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the day of June 2009. Executed this day of June 2009, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk P562 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MELLO-ROOS COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT N0.93-3 FOOTHILL MARKETPLACE ANNUAL STATUS REPORT Resolution No. JUNE 2009 P563 BACKGROUND On December 15, 1993, the electors within the boundary of Community Facilities District No. 93-3 (Foothill Mazketplace) authorized the District to incur bonded indebtedness in the principal amount of $4,825,000 for the purpose of financing the acquisition of the street, storm drain, sewer and water improvements. The district is bounded on the north by Foothill Blvd:, on the east by Etiwanda Ave. and on the west by Interstate 15. The maximum rate has been set at $20,000 per acre. This amount can be levied at a lower rate but cannot exceed the maximum tax rate as set. On July 1, 1999 this district was refunded as part of Rancho Cucamonga Reassessment District No. 1999-1 under the Rancho Cucamonga Public Finance Authority (the "Authority"). The Authority issued bonds to acquire the Acquired Obligations, fund separate reserve funds and pay the costs of issuing the Bonds. The acquired obligations for Community Facilities District 93-3 are the aggregate principal amount of $4,525,000. FISCAL YEAR 2009-2010 The annual tax rate of $14,369 for fiscal year 2009-2010 will provide sufficient funding to pay for operations and maintenance in the amount of $423,490. P564 COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT PROPOSED USES AND SOURCES OF FUNDS USES: DEBT SERVICE CITY AND TRUSTEE ADMINISTRATION, GENERAL OVERHEAD & LIABILITY CONTRACT SERVICES DELINQUENT ASSESSMENTS INTEREST REVENUE SPECIAL TAX Resolution No. $386,920 $ 35,570 $ 1,000 $ 0 $423,490 $ 6,520 423 890 $430,100 $14,369 PER ACRE P565 M N °' E ~ N M •'/ N ~ ~~ = ~ J 01 r , w ... 0 ® > 4 = U U ~ 0 O m `~xti ~ ~ y ~' J o ~ _ _ ._.._.._ .. ~ ~ ~ .~ 1 = i c J _ m o ~ i N L ~ 3 i j m 0 i O l ` ~ _.._.._inb'3se3 in i C ~ i ny epuenn!;3 ny epuenn!;3 i ~.._.._.._.._.._.._..- i ~ ny ~a;sayooa ny ~a;sayooa r"' r.._.._.._.._. ~ ny uaA!II!W i ny ua~!II!W i i i ny uaneH • i ny uaneH i ny esow~aH i ny esow~aH i nV Ple4!yo~H ~ nb' Ple4!4o~H ny uewllaH i ••~in ny uewllaH r i ~ r~ t v i ny p e~(au !n 3Sue!lawe~~ €g~~i~s~ `;f ~a~s r~ i . •~, ..~ ... , E e 'e~ ~os ~~~€~a v s ~ ~ s g@ •~• 'C J ~ 3 r L ~4Ig€6§4 ~~P •~ _..~' 'o ~ f0 O Q t § g [~@8 i~fi '§~ ~ ~ ~ T m LL ;~f{ f' ~ °~E € 6 v_ c N , ee,, £97EF~ ~~;~~~ i _ m 4 a" 7 qaatta E€ e ~ E ~ ~ `~ i a~~~ 8E8: &3E~s1~~ P566 T H E C I T Y O ANC[IO CUCAMONGA Staff Report DATE: June 3, 2009 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: John R. Gillison, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Servi BY: Ingrid Y. Bruce, GIS/Special Districts Manager SUBJECT': APPROVAL TO SET ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2000-O1 (SOUTH ETIWANDA) WITH NO INCREASE TO THE CURRENT RATE. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached Resolution setting the annual special tax for Community Facilities District No. 2000-01 (South Etiwanda). Pursuant to Section 53340 and 53358 of the Government Code Mello-Roos Community Facilities District Act of 1982, the City Council is authorized to annually levy the tax rate to pay debt service on the bonds. There is no increase to the current rate for fiscal year 2009/2010. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS On November 7, 2000, an election was held and the property owners within the boundary of Community Facilities District No. 2000-O1 (South Etiwanda) authorized the district to incur bonded indebtedness in the principal amount of $1,365,000. On November 15, 2000, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 645 authorizing the levy of a special tax in the district. Bonds were issued on December 21, 2000, for the purpose of financing the acquisition of certain public facilities that included street, sewer, water, storm drain, landscaping and pazk improvements that are required for and will permit the development of the properties within the district. The levy of special taxes annually is based on the square footage of the home for residential properties and is based on acreage for non-residential properties. P567 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT CFD NO. 2000-01(SOUTH ETIWANDA) June 3, 2009 Page 2 Saecial Tax Land Use Class Residential Floor Area Assi¢ned Facilities Saecial Tax 1 2,301 Sq. Ft. or greater $500 per unit 2 1,801 - 2,300 Sq. Ft. 475 per unit 3 1,800 Sq. Ft. or less 425 per unit 4 Non-Residential Property $3,700 per Acre Attachments: Resolution Exhibit "A" Map -2- RESOLUTION NO. ©~I-III A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RE-ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT N0.2000-O1 (SOUTH ETIWANDA) WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Califomia, (hereinafter refereed to as the "legislative body of the local Agency"), has initiated proceedings, held a public hearing, conducted an election and received a favorable vote from the qualified electors relating to the levy of a special tax in a Community Facilities District, all as authorized pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982", being Chapter 2.5, Part 1, Division 2, Title 5 of the Government Code for the State of California. This Community Facilities District shall hereinafter be referred to as COMMUNITY FACII,ITIES DISTRICT N0.2000-O1 (South Etiwanda) (hereinafter referred to as the "District"); and WHEREAS, at this time, bonds have been authorized for purposes of financing the project facilities for said District; and WHEREAS, this legislative body, by Ordinance as authorized by Section 53340 of the Government Code of the State of California, has authorized the levy of a special tax to pay for costs and expenses related to said Community Facilities District, and this legislative body is desirous to establish the specific rate of the special tax to be collected for the next fiscal year. NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the above recitais are all true and correct. SECTION 2: That the specific rate and amount of the special tax to be collected to pay for the costs and expenses for the next Fiscal Yeaz 2009/2010 for the referenced district is hereby determined and established as set forth in the attached, referenced and incorporated Exhibit "A". P568 SECTION 3: That the rate as set forth above does not exceed the amount as previously authorized by Ordinance of this legislative body, and is not in excess of that as previously approved by the qualified electors of the District. P569 Resolution No. Page SECTION 4: That the proceeds of the special tax be used to pay, in whole or in part, the costs of the following, in the following order of priority: A. Payment of principal and interest on any outstanding authorized bonded indebtedness. B. Necessary replenishment of bond reserve funds or other reserve funds; C. Payment of costs and expenses of authorized public facilities and public services. D. Repayment of advances and loans, if appropriate. The proceeds of the special taxes shall be used as set forth above, and shall not be used for any other purpose. SECTION 5: The special tax shall be collected in the same manner as ordinary ad valorem property taxes aze collected, and shall be subject to the same penalties and same procedure and sale in cases of any delinquency for ad valorem taxes, and the Tax Collector is hereby authorized to deduct reasonable administrative costs incurred in collecting any said special tax. SECTION 6: All monies above collected shall be paid into the Community Facilities District funds, including any bond fund and reserve fund. SECTION 7: The Auditor of the County is hereby directed to enter in the next county assessment roll on which taxes will become due, opposite each lot or parcel of land effected in a space mazked "public improvements, special tax", or by any other suitable designation, the installment of the special tax, and for the exact rate and amount of said tax, reference is made to the attached Exhibit "A". SECTION 8: The County Auditor shall then, at the close of the tax collection period, promptly render to this Agency a detailed report showing the amount and/or amounts of such special tax installments, interest, penalties and percentages so collected and from what property collected, and also provide a statement of any percentages retained for the expense of making any such collection. P570 Resolution No. Page PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of June 2009. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: Donald J. Kurth, M.D., Mayor ATTEST: Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk I, JANICE C. REYNOLDS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a regulaz meeting of said City Council held on the day of June 2009. Executed this day of June 2009, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk P571 Resolution No. Page CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO.2000-O1 EXHIBIT "A" The Resolution establishing the annual special tax refers to this Exhibit for an explanation ofthe rate and method of apportionment of the Special Taxes for Fiscal Yeaz 2009/2010. SPECIAL TAX PROPERTY CATEGORIES There aze two categories of property subject to the levy of Special Tax, which are identified as follows: 1. DEVELOPED PROPERTY All pazcels of Developed Property for which a building permit has been issued for purposes of constructing one or more residential dwelling units. 2. iJNDEVELOPED PROPERTY All pazcels of Taxable Property not classified as Developed Property, Public Property and/or Property owner's Association Property that are not Exempt Property pursuant of section E. TAXING CLASSIFICATIONS AND SPECIAL TAX RATES The taxing classifications for the above Property Categories and the authorized Special Tax rates for Fiscal Yeaz 2009/2010 are as follows: P572 Resolution No. Page Assigned Special Taxes for Developed Propert y Communit y Facilities District No. 2000.01 Land Use Cateeory Taxable Residential Floor Area Assi gned Special Tax Unit Per Taxable Unit 1. Residential Property D/CJ 2,301 sq. ft. or greater $500 2. Residential Property D/U 1,801 sq. ft. - 2,300 sq. ft. $475 3. Residential Property D/CJ 1,800 sq. ft. or less $425 4. Non-Residential Acre N/A $3,700 Property Backup Special Tax When a Final map is recorded the backup Special tax for the Pazcels of taxable Property within such Final map azea shall be determined by multiplying $3,700 by the Net Taxable Acreage in such Final Map and dividing such amount by the number of Pazcels of taxable property (i.e. the number of residential lots) within such Final map. If a Final Map within the CFD includes Pazcels of Taxable Property for which building permits for both residential and non-residential construction maybe issued, then the Backup Special Tax for each Parcel of Residential Property within the CFD shall be computed by the Administrator exclusive of the allocable portion of total Net Taxable Acreage attributable to Pazcels of Table Property for which building permits for non-residential construction maybe issued. METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT OF THE SPECIAL TAX As commenced in Fiscal Year 2001-2002 and for each following Fiscal Yeaz, the City Council shall determine the Special Tax Requirement and shall levy the Special Tax on all Taxable Property in the CFD until the amount of Special Taxes equals the Special Tax Requirement. The Special Tax shall be levied each Fiscal Yeaz as follows: P573 Resolution No. Page First: The Special Tax shall be levied proportionately on each Pazcel of Developed Property at up to 100% of the applicable Assigned Special Tax to satisfy the Special Tax Requirement; Second: If additional monies aze needed to satisfy the Special Tax Requirement after the first step has been completed, the Special Tax shall be levied Proportionately on each Parcel of Undeveloped Property at up to 100% of the Maximum Special Tax for Undeveloped Property; Third: If additional moneys aze needed to satisfy the Special Tax Requirement after the first two steps have been completed, the Special Tax to be levied on each Pazcel of Developed Property whose Maximum Special Tax is derived by the application of the Backup Special Tax shall be increased Proportionately from the Assigned Special Tax up to the Maximum Special Tax for each such Pazcel; Fourth: If additional monies are needed to satisfy the Special Tax Requirement after the first three steps have been completed, the Special Tax shall be levied proportionately on each Parcel of Public Property and/or Property Owner's Association Property that is not Exempt Property pursuant to the provisions of Section E, at up to 100% of the Maximum Special Tax. Notwithstanding the above, under no circumstances will the Special Taxes levied against any Parcel of Residential Property be increased by more than ten percent (10%) per Fiscal year as a consequence of delinquency or default by the owner of any other Parcel of Taxable Property within the CFD. EXEMPTIONS The City Council shall not levy Special Taxes on up to 26.04 Net Taxable Acres of Public Property and Property Owner's Association Property within the CFD. Exempt Property status will be assigned by the Administrator in the chronological order in which property becomes Public Property and Property Owner's Association Property. After the limit of 26.04 Net Taxable Acres within the CFD has been reached, the Maximum Special Tax obligation for any additional Public Property and/or Property Owner's Association Property within the CFD shall be subj ect to the levy of the Special Tax as provided for in the fourth step. P574 O ~ ~, O o O y ° 0 N o E J o •1~1 ' ~ T ~ U U ~n °1 •'~x ti J ~ o Q ._ ._.._.._.._ ' "O D' N IIww vI ~ C _ O r `1-i J N fd ~ ~ m y O O ~ LL Q _.._.._in`d3se3 in i ~ J= ' ~ ® c uenn n e ,~ ny epuenn133 y p R3 aaJ e ~e ~ ~ ~ . .._.._ ._. .._ O ~ ~ V ny Jalsayooa ny Jalsayooa r" i ny ua~!II!W ~ .._.._.._.._ ny ua~!II!W i i i ny uaneH : ny uaneH ! i ny esowJaH j ny esowJaH i n`d Pleq!yoJy; ^d Pleq!4oJV i ! ny uewllaH i ~ .• ~ ny uewllaH i ~ L P~ L v ~ ny p eRauln i 3S ue!lawe~ i ~¢~~!f~~~F~~P .._.._ ._..i' g 11 3E ° ,• P ~ _ nF/anOJ~ 4F52Ej F SS 1 .• '~• L J 3 L ~ S~;E~P~ ~ N m o i Q ~ 3'fs g8 99ff ~ ~ E ~ ~ ~ l i C6 ; 'F~ l Y v C [[ E [[[ t pp F pppp dd TE S ~~~~'}l ~ h m @ ~ S ~a EP e~s y~n,a t ~ s2s! Bi iEiF P575 T H E C I T Y O F RANCHO C U C A M O N G A Staff Report DATE: June 3, 2009 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: John R. Gillison, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Serv BY: Ingrid Y. Bruce, GIS/Special Districts Manager S[JBJECI': APPROVAL TO SET ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2000-02 (RANCHO CUCAMONGA CORPORATE PARK) WITH NO INCREASE TO THE CURRENT RATE. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached Resolution setting an annual special tax levy of $4,134.47 an acre per pazcel to discharge bond obligations in Community Facilities District No. 2000-02 (Rancho Cucamonga Corporate Pazk). Pursuant to Section 53340 and 53358 of the Government Code Mello-Roos Community Facilities District Act of 1982, the City Council is authorized to annually levy the tax rate to pay debt service on the bonds. There is no increase to the current rate for fiscal year 2009/2010. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS On November 7, 2000, an election was held and the property owners within the boundary of Community Facilities District No. 2000-02 (Rancho Cucamonga Corporate Pazk) authorized the district to incur bonded indebtedness in the principal amount of $6,835,000. On December 6, 2000, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 646 authorizing the levy of a special tax in the district. Bonds were issued on December 21, 2000 for the purpose of financing the acquisition of street improvements on public street improvements required as a condition of approval of development of the property within the proposed district including Milliken Avenue, Arrow Route Highway and Foothill Boulevazd; such street improvements to include but not to be limited to: demolition and grading, curb, gutter and sidewalks, traffic signals; entry feature and signs; fire hydrants; storm drains; water and sewer improvements; paving; striping; landscaping and irrigation improvements; public utilities and appurtenances. P576 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT CFD N0.2000-02 (RANCHO CUCAMONGA CORPORATE PARK) June 3, 2009 Page 2 The property owners within the district approved the maximum rate for the special tax at $4134.47 per acre. On each July 1, commencing July 1, 2002 the Maximum Annual Special tax shall be increased by two percent (2%) of the amount in effect for the previous fiscal yeaz. This special tax shall be levied only so long as required for each pazcel of taxable property to discharge bond obligations through fiscal yeaz 2035-2036. Attachments: Resolution Annual Status Report Map -2- P577 RESOLUTION NO. ~~ - ~~ 2 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RE-ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO.2000-02 (RANCHO CUCAMONGA CORPORATE PARK) WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, (hereinafter referred to as the "legislative body of the local Agency"), has initiated proceedings, held a public hearing, conducted an election and received a favorable vote from the qualified electors relating to the levy of a special tax in a Community Facilities District, all as authorized pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Mello Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982", being Chapter 2.5, Part 1, Division 2, Title 5 of the Government Code for the State of California. This Community Facilities District shall hereinafter be referred to as COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT N0.2000-02 (RANCHO CUCAMONGA CORPORATE PARK) (hereinafter referred to as the "District"); and WHEREAS, at this time, bonds have been authorized for purposes of financing the project facilities for said District; and WHEREAS, this legislative body, by Ordinance as authorized by Section 53340 of the Government Code of the State of Califomia, has authorized the levy of a special tax to pay for costs and expenses related to said Community Facilities District, and this legislative body is desirous to establish the specific rate of the special tax to be collected for the next fiscal yeaz. NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the above recitals aze all true and correct SECTION 2: That the specific rate and amount of the special tax to be collected to pay for the costs and expenses for the next fiscal yeaz 2009-2010 for the referenced district is hereby determined and established as set forth in the attached, referenced and incorporated in the Annual Status Report. SECTION 3: That the rate as set forth above does not exceed the amount as previously authorized by Ordinance of this legislative body, and is not in excess of that as previously approved by the qualified electors of the District. SECTION 4: That the proceeds of the special tax shall be used to pay, in whole or in part, the costs of the following, in the following order of priority: P578 Resolution No. Page A. Payment of principal of and interest on any outstanding authorized bonded indebtedness; B. Necessary replenishment of bond reserve funds or other reserve funds; C. Payment of costs and expenses of authorized public facilities and public services, and incidental expenses pursuant to the Act; and D. Repayment of advances and loans, if appropriate. The proceeds of the special taxes shall be used as set forth above, and shall not be used for any other purpose. SECTION 5: The special tax shall be collected in the same manner as ordinary ad valorem property taxes aze collected, and shall be subject to the same penalties and same procedure and sale in cases of any delinquency for ad valorem taxes, and the Tax Collector is hereby authorized to deduct reasonable administrative costs incurred in collecting any said special tax. SECTION 6: All monies above collected shall be paid into the Community Facilities District funds, including any bond fund and reserve fund. SECTION 7: The Auditor of the County is hereby directed to enter in the next county assessment roll on which taxes will become due, opposite each lot or parcel of land effected in a space mazked "public improvements, special tax", or by any other suitable designation, the installment of the special tax, and for the exact rate and amount of said tax, reference is made to the attached Annual Status Report. SECTION 8: The County Auditor shall then, at the close of the tax collection period, promptly render to this Agency a detailed report showing the amount and/or amounts of such special tax installments, interest, penalties and percentages so collected and from what property collected, and also provide a statement of any percentages retained for the expense of making any such collection. P579 Resolution No. Page PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of June 2009. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: Donald J. Kurth, M.D., Mayor ATTEST: Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk I, JANICE C. REYNOLDS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a regulaz meeting of said City Council held on the day of June 2009. Executed this day of June 2009, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk P580 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MELLO-RODS COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT N0.2000-02 RANCHO CUCAMONGA CORPORATE PARK ANNUAL STATUS REPORT Resolution No. JUNE 2009 P581 Resolution No. Page BACKGRQUND On November 7, 2000, the electors within the boundazy of Community Facilities District No. 2000-02 (Rancho Cucamonga Corporate Pazk) authorized the District to incur bonded indebtedness in the principal amount of $6,835,000 for the purpose of financing the acquisition of street improvements on public street improvements required as a condition of approval of development of the property within the proposed district including Milliken Avenue, Artow Route Highway and Foothill Boulevard; such street improvements to include but not to be limited to: demolition and grading, curb, gutter and sidewalks, traffic signals; entry feature and signs; fire hydrants; storm drains; water and sewer improvements; paving; striping; landscaping and irrigation improvements; public utilities and appurtenances. The district was approved setting the maximum rate at $3,896 per acre. However, on each July 1, commencing July 1, 2002 the Maximum Annual Special tax shall be increased by two percent (2%) of the amount in effect for the previous fiscal yeaz. This special tax shall be levied only so long as required for each pazcel of taxable property to dischazge bond obligations through fiscal yeaz 2035-2036. FISCAL YEAR 2009-2010 The annual tax rate for fiscal year 2009-2010 will be $4,301.50 per acre, and will provide sufficient funding for maintenance and operations in the amount of $577,360. P582 COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT PROPOSED USES AND SOURCES OF FUNDS USES: DEBT SERVICE CITY AND TRUSTEE ADMINISTRATION, GENERAL OVERHEAD & LIABILITY CONTRACT SERVICES DELINQUENT ASSESSMENTS SOURCES: DELINQUENT ASSESSMENTS INTEREST REVENUE FUND BALANCE SPECIAL TAX Resolution No. Page $528,860 $ 48,500 $ 1,500 $ 0 $577,360 $ 10,400 $ 9,030 $ 0 $557,930 $577,360 $4,217.16 PER ACRE P583 N O ~ ~, O N o O y d O N E °o J N •I~I > (~ Q ~ r ~ ~ U U u~ w ° >s ' xti 0 _ •y ~ 'J ~ ° Q ._ ._.._.._.._ ' ~ ~ N y ~ ~ o ^, ^ W _ J m ~ N j m ~ o 3 0 V i u°. _.._.._ i nV 3se3 in I ~ ® i t ~ ny epueMg3 ny epuenn!33 ~ ~ ~8 ~aa~~ ep .._.._. ~ ~ • V ny ~alsayooa ny ~alsayooa P" i ny ua~!II!W ~ .._.._.._..- ny ua~!II!W i i i ny uaneH • ny uaneH i i ny esow~aH i ny esow~aH i nV PIe4!4o~b' ; nb' Pleq!4o~`d ~ n uew a ny uewllaH i ~~ •• ~ y ll H t, L ~ i nb' P e~(au! n i e@ 4e2=~ eg;e 1 ~ ~.~' ..~ ~ ~ .s ~°nE'~4~~gg " ~ ~~a~~t '• d ' .s•~~• ~ d t O aD 6~ ~~ep~~pZPa (A ~ m o LL ¢ € e$ 3 Eg E ~BE~ i ~ ~ B p i_ €s S2>; ~ c w m £c 5~' ~~~g' ig°gt g ~~e{4~pY = ~ __ m ~~ ~ ~ EP ezs g4 ,a aY~g ~~fi ~ ~:~ ~ ~~ a x p2{$ s ~e ~ ~3 ~~a ~ g p E a i P584 T H E C I T Y O F R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A StaffRepcrrt DATE: June 3, 2009 TO: Mayor and Members of City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: John R. Gillison, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Servi BY: Ingrid Y. Bruce, GIS/Special Districts Manager SUBJECT: APPROVAL TO SET ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT N0.2000-03 (RANCHO SUMMIT) OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF PARKS AND PARKWAYS WITH NO INCREASE TO THE CURRENT RATE. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached Resolution setting the annual special tax for the new Community Facilities District No. 2000-03 (Rancho Summit). Pursuant to Section 53340 and 53358 of the Government Code Mello-Roos Community Facilities District Act of 1982, the City Council is authorized to annually levy the tax rate to pay for the operation and maintenance of pazks and pazkways. The Official Statement, Appendix B, Section C Maximum Special Tax -Developed Property 1. (c) authorizes an annual increase. Due to the current economic conditions, staff respectfully asks City Council to institute a 0% percent increase for fiscal yeaz 2009/2010. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS On August 16, 2000 approved Resolution No. 00-149 and established Community Facilities District No. 2000-03; on October 11, 2000 the qualified electors of the District, being the owners of the land within the District, voted to approve the levy of a special tax to pay for certain public services and the administering of such District. On July 6, 2005, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 744 approving the levy of the special tax. On each July 1, commencing on July 1, 2006, the Maximum Special Tax for Developed Property shall be increased based on the percentage change in the Consumer Price Index (CPI), with a maximum annual increase of six percent (6%) and a minimum annual increase of two percent (2%) per Fiscal Year. P585 Page 2 June 3, 2009 City Council Staff Report CFD 2000-03 The District was authorized to finance pazk improvements including clearing and grading of pazk sites, park hazdscape and restrooms, street improvements and pazkway hazdscape landscaping of pazks and parkways and park equipment with a useful life of five (5) years or more. The District is located south of Summit Avenue on the east and west sides of Wazdman Bullock Road. The special tax shall be levied as long as necessary to meet the Special Tax Requirement for Services. Attachments: Resolution Exhibit "A" Map P586 RESOLUTION NO. O9- ~~/ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, PROVIDING FOR THE LEVY OF SPECIAL TAX "B" FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2000-03 (RANCHO SUMMIT) FOR TAX YEAR 2009/2010 TO FINANCE THE OPERATION OF AND MAINTENANCE OF PARK AND PARKWAYS. Recitals WHEREAS, by its Resolution No. 00-190 adopted on September 20, 2000 the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Califomia (the "City Council"), pursuant to the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982 (Section 53311 and following of the California Government Code) (the "Act"), established City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Facilities District No. 2000- 03 (Rancho Summit) (the "District"); and WHEREAS, at an election held on October 11, 2000 the qualified electors of the District unanimously approved the levy of a special tax (the "Special Tax `B"') pursuant to the rate and method of apportionment thereof for the purpose of financing the operation and maintenance of parks and pazkways within the District; and WHEREAS, in 2005 the City Council initiated proceeding to modify the Rate and Method; and WHEREAS, on June 15, 2005, the City Council submitted the proposed modifications to the Rate and Method to the qualified electors of the District; and WHEREAS, on the same day, the qualified electors of the District voted unanimously to authorize the modifications to the Rate and Method (the Rate and Method as modified, the "Amended and Restated Rate and Method"); and WHEREAS, the City Council subsequently enacted Ordinance No. 755 (the "Ordinance") which became effective on August on August 5, 2005, to authorize the levy of Special Tax "B" pursuant to the Amended and Restated Rate and Method; and WHEREAS, the Act provides that the City Council may provide, by resolution, for the levy of Special Tax "B" for any future tax yeaz; and WHEREAS, the City Council desires to provide for the levy Special Tax "B" for Tax Yeaz 2009-2010 pursuant to the Ordinance. NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: P587 Resolution No. SECTION l: That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2: That the specific rate and amount of the Special Tax "B" to be collected for Fiscal Year 2009-2010 for the District is hereby detennined and established as set forth Exhibit "A" to this Resolution, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. SECTION 3: That the rate as set forth above does not exceed the amount as previously authorized by the Ordinance, and is not in excess of that as previously approved by the qualified electors of the District. SECTION 4: That the proceeds of Special Tax "B" shall be used, in whole or in part, for the following: A. Payment of costs and expenses of the operation and maintenance of authorized pazks and pazkways and incidental expenses pursuant to the Act; B. Payment of an amount necessary to fund or replenish an operating reserve for the costs of the operation of authorized parks and pazkways; C. Payment of a proportionate shaze of Administrative Expenses as such tern is defined in the Modified Rate and Method The proceeds of Special Tax "B" shall be used as set forth above, and shall not be used for any other purpose. SECTION 5: Special Tax "B" shall be collected in the same manner as ordinary ad valorem property taxes aze collected, and shall be subject to the same penalties and same procedwe and sale in cases of any delinquency for ad valorem taxes, and the Tax Collector is hereby authorized to deduct reasonable administrative costs incurred in collecting any said special tax. SECTION 6: All monies collected pursuant to this Resolution shall be paid into the Community Facilities District funds. SECTION 7: The Auditor of the County is hereby directed to enter in the next county assessment roll on which taxes will become due, opposite each lot or parcel of land effected in a space marked "public improvements, special tax", or by any other suitable designation, the installment of Special Tax "B," and for the exact rate and amount of said tax, reference is made to the attached Exhibit "A". SECTION 8: The County Auditor shall then, at the close of the tax collection period, promptly render to this Agency a detailed report showing the amount and/or amounts of such special tax installments, interest, penalties and percentages so collected and from what property collected, and also provide a statement of any percentages retained for the expense of making any such collection. P588 Resolution No. Page PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of June 2009. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: Donald J. Kurth, M.D., Mayor ATTEST: Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk I, JANICE C. REYNOLDS, CITY CLERK of the City ofRancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Califomia, at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the day of June 2009. Executed this day of June 2009, at Rancho Cucamonga, Califomia. Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk P589 Resolution No. Page CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT N0.2000-03 EXHIBIT "A" The Resolution establishing the annual special tax refers to this Exhibit for an explanation of the rate and method of apportionment of the Special Taxes for Fiscal Yeaz 2009/2010. CLASSIFICATION OF PARCELS Each Fiscal Year, all Taxable Property within CFD No. 2000-03 shall be assigned to a Zone and further classified as Developed Property, Taxable Public Property, Taxable Property Owner Association Property, or Undeveloped Property, and shall be subject to Special Taxes in accordance with this Amended and Restated Rate and Method of Apportionment determined pursuant to Sections A and B below. Residential Property shall be assigned to Land Use Classes 1 through 10 and Non-Residential Property shall be assigned to Land Use Class 11. The Maximum Special Tax for Residential Property shall be based on the Residential Floor Area of the dwelling unit(s) located on the Assessor's Pazcel. The Maximum Special Tax for Non-Residential Property shall be based on the Acreage of the Assessor's Parcel. The Maximum Special Tax for any Assessor's Parcel of Developed Property containing more than one Land Use Class shall be determined pursuant to Section C below. A. MAXIMUM SPECIAL TAX 1. Developed Property (a). Maximum Special Tax The Maximum Special Tax B for each Land Use Class of Developed Property is shown in the Table below. (b). Assigned Special Tax B The Fiscal Yeaz 2009-2010 Assigned Special Tax B for each Land Use Class is shown in the Table below. P590 Assigned Maximum Special Tax B for Developed Property in City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Facilities District No. 2000-03 (Rancho Summit) Fiscal Year 2009-2010 Laud Residential Use Class Description Floor Area Assessors Parcel Numbers Amouut 2 Residential Pro ert 1850 - 2049 s.f. 22649201, 07, 21, 23, 26 $1,000.62 22650204, 06, 10, 20, 22, 27, 28, 38, 45 22650253,57 22651204, 14, 17, 18, 22, 27, 34, 37, 40 22651246, 49, 51, 54, 55, 60, 61, 63, 68 22651270, 71, 74, 76 22652305, 14, 15 22653213, 15, 24, 27, 30, 32, 35, 36 22653306, 08, 10, 11, 13, 14, 15, 17, 21 22653325, 27, 33, 40, 42, 45 3 Residential Pro ert 2050 - 2249 s.f. 22649206, 08, 17, 19, 24 22650202, 05, 08, 12, 21, 23, 36, 44, 51 ' 22650252, 56, 59 22651201, 05, 09, 15, 19, 23, 25, 28, 50 22651253, 56, 59, 69, 75 22652312,17 22653205, 09, 16, 31, 33 22653318, 29, 37, 39 4 Residential Pro a 2250 - 2449 s.f. 22610227 22643209, 37, 50 22644414, 21, 25 22645205 22649202, 05, 09, 16, 20, 22, 25 22650203, 07, 09, 11, 19, 25, 33, 39, 43 22650246, 49, 54, 55, 58 22651202, 06, O8, 12, 16, 20, 21, 24, 26 22651230, 32, 35, 57, 62, 64, 66 22652302, 11, 13, 16, 23 22651230, 32, 35, 57, 62, 64, 66 22652302, 11, 13, 16, 23 22653204, 08, 14, 17, 21, 25, 28, 37 22653312, 20, 24, 26, 28, 35, 38, 41 P591 5 Residential Pro a 2450 - 2649 s.f. 22610228 $1,000.62 22643202, 05, 07, 11, 13, 14, 15, 20, 22 22643224, 25, 28, 30, 32, 34, 35, 39, 43 22643245, 48, 51, 55, 59, 60 22644401, 03, 05, 07, 09, 10, 12, 13, 16 22644418, 23, 27, 31 22645201,03 22649203,10 22650214, 17, 24, 26, 31, 32, 35, 40, 42 22651207, 11, 31, 33, 36, 39, 41, 43, 45 22651247, 65, 73 22652303, 07, 09, 18, 21 22653201, 03, 07, 11, 12, 19, 23, 26, 29 22653234 22653301, 03, O5, 16, 23, 32, 34, 43 6 Residential Pro ert 2650 - 2849 s.f. 22643204, O8, 12, 16, 26, 29, 36, 38, 40 22643242, 47, 49, 53, 56 22644402, 04, 11, 15, 19, 24, 28, 30, 32 22649204,18 22650201, 13, 15, 16, 18, 29, 30, 34, 41 22650247, 48, 50 22651203, 10, 13, 29, 38, 42, 44, 48, 52 22651258, 67, 72 22652301, 04, 06, 08, 10, 22 22653202, 06, 10, 18, 20, 22 22653302, 04, 07, 09, 19, 22, 30, 31, 36 22653344,46 7 Residential Pro ert 2850 - 3049 s.f. 22643201, 03, O6, 10, 19, 21, 23, 27, 31 22643233, 41, 44, 46, 54, 58 22644406, 08, 17, 20, 22, 26, 29 22645202,04 11 Residential Pro ert NIA 22649211, 12-15 P592 (c). Increase in the Assigned Maximum Special Tax B On each July I, commencing on July 1, 2006, the Maximum Special Tax B listed in the Table above shall be increased based on the percentage change in the Consumer Price Index, with a maximum annual increase of six percent (6%) and a minimum annual increase of two percent (2%) per Fiscal Yeaz. (d).Multiple Land Use Classes In some instances an Assessor's Pazcel of Developed Property may contain more than one Land Use Class. The Maximum Special Tax levied on an Assessor's Pazcel shall be the sum of the Maximum Special Taxes for all Land Use Classes located on that Assessor's Pazcel. For an Assessor's Parcel that contains both Residential Property and Non-Residential Property, the Acreage of such Assessor's Pazcel shall be allocated to each type of property based on the amount of Acreage designated for each land use as determined by reference to the site plan approved for such Assessor's Parcel. The CFD Administrator's allocation to each type of property shall be fmal. 2. Undeveloped Property, Taxable Public Property, and Taxable Property Owner Association Property (a). Maximum Special Tax B The Fiscal Year 2008-2009 Maximum Special Tax B for Undeveloped Property in Zone 1 or Zone 2 shall be $4,683 per Acre or portion thereof. Taxable Public Property and Taxable Property Owner Association Property shall not be subject to a Maximum Special Tax B. (c). Increase in the Maximum Special Tax On each July 1, commencing on July 1, 2006, the Maximum Special Tax B for Undeveloped Property identified in Section C.2.(b). above shall be increased based on the percentage change in the Consumer Price Index, with a maximum annual increase of six percent (6%) and a minimum annual increase of two percent (2%) per Fiscal Yeaz. P593 B. METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT OF THE SPECIAL TAX 1. Special Tax B Commencing with Fiscal Yeaz 2006-2007 and for each following Fiscal Yeaz, the Council shall determine the Special Tax Requirement for Services and shall levy the Special Tax B until the total Special Tax B levy equals the Special Tax Requirement for Services. The Special Tax B shall be levied each Fiscal Yeaz as follows: First: The Special Tax B shall be levied proportionately on each Assessor's Pazcel of Developed Property at up to 100% of the applicable Maximum Special Tax B; Second: If additional monies are needed to satisfy the Special Tax Requirement for Services after the first step has been completed, the Special Tax B shall be levied Proportionately on each Assessor's Pazcel of Undeveloped Property, which as of January 1 of the previous Fiscal Yeaz was located within a Final Subdivision, at up to 100% of the Maximum Special Tax B for Undeveloped Property; Third: If additional monies aze needed to satisfy the Special Tax Requirement for Services after the second step has been completed, the Special Tax B shall be levied Proportionately on each Assessor's Pazcel of Undeveloped Property, which as of January 1 of the previous Fiscal Yeaz was not located within a Final Subdivision, at up to 100% of the Maximum Special Tax B for Undeveloped Property; C. i. Special Tax B No Special Tax B shall be levied on Public Property and Property Owner Association Property in Zone 1 and/or Zone 2. D. APPEALS AND INTERPRETATIONS Any landowner or resident who feels that the amount of the Special Tax levied on their Assessor's Parcel is in error may submit a written appeal to CFD No. 2000-03. The CFD Administrator shall review the appeal and if the CFD Administrator concurs, the amount of the Special Tax levied shall be appropriately modified. The Council may interpret this Amended and Restated Rate and Method of Apportionment for purposes of clarifying any ambiguity and make determinations relative to the annual administration of the Special Tax and any landowner or resident appeals. Any decision of the Council shall be final and binding as to all persons. E. MANNER OF COLLECTION The Special Tax B will be collected in the same manner and at the same time as ordinary ad valorem property taxes; provided, however, that CFD No. 2000-03 may P594 directly bill the Special Tax, may collect Special Taxes at a different time or in a different manner if necessary to meet its financial obligations, and may covenant to foreclose and may actually foreclose on delinquent Assessor's Parcels as permitted by the Act. F. PREPAYMENT OF SPECIAL TAX B The Special Tax B may not be prepaid. G. TERM OF SPECIAL TAX The Special Tax B shall be levied as long as necessary to meet the Special Tax Requirement for Services. P595 M d C "' ~ y O O ~ '~ O N J N .-- ~i > C _T ~ U U in ~ '~xy o ,~ ~ J •~ ~ o O ~ .. _.._.._.._ ~ N tq i ~ _ o r J [d ~ rr _ ~ ~ h r 3 ~ m o 0 (~ 1 ~ _.._.._ i nV lse3 in ! i c ,=' ~ ny epuevn!33 ny epuenn!33 ~9 ~aa~~ ep . _. ~ ~ V ny ~alsayooy ny ~alsayooa r"' i ny ua~!11!W ~ .._.._.._..- ny ua~!II!W i i i ny uaneH • ny uaneH i i ny esow~aH i ny esow~aH i n`d Pieq!yay . nb' Pleq!4o~t7 1 ! ny uewllaH ny uewllaH i iE ~ ~•• ~ L I tI t ~ i ny p eRau!n 1 f e 3Sue!lawe~~ ~gk^! ~i~ t F@ ~_~i pell e4S€al F~3a. I ~~i°I • . ..~ s E n Byny ~ E ~~ ~ ¢~ j '~ j- ~alpg di ~~ ~.._.._. ~ ~ _..r_. ny anal ~i_~~g d;$ i.., .~" in ~_ m ~ in ,ts ~E~Rf •......1...... _.._..~••.. rn d ~- ~ o ao g gplq ~ ^ ~ O Q ~~p~paS~~E S£~~{{ ~ ~ m LL ~iE E N m Bg~~€~~~!~: z r~ppn,14g7 ~~ ~r~€as, G€~ ~~3'f-d~~~.gg U PtEa 1P .r f;1 P596 4 T H E C I T Y O F RANCHO C U C A M O N G A StaffRepo~t DATE: June 3, 2009 T'O: Mayor and Members of City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: John R. Gillison, Deputy City Manager/Administrative ServC`h'' BY: Ingrid Y. Bruce, GIS/Special Districts Manager SUBJECT: APPROVAL TO SET ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT N0.2000-03 (RANCHO SUMMIT) WITH NO INCREASE TO THE CURRENT RATE. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached Resolution setting the annual special tax for Community Facilities District No. 2000-03 (Rancho Summit). Pursuant to Section 53340 and 53358 of the Government Code Mello-Roos Community Facilities District Act of 1982, the City Council is authorized to annually levy the tax rate to pay debt service on the bonds. There is no increase to the current rate for fiscal yeaz 2009/2010. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS On October 11, 2000 an election was held and the property owners within the boundary of Community Facilities District No. 2000-03 authorized the district to incur bonded indebtedness in the principal amount of $9,835,000. On July 6, 2005, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 744 approving the levy of the special tax, and on September 21, 2005 approved Resolution No. OS-278 authorizing the issuance of bonds. The District was authorized to finance pazk improvements including clearing and grading of pazk sites, pazk hazdscape and restrooms, street improvements and parkway hazdscape ]andscaping of pazks and parkways and pazk equipment with a useful life of five (5) yeazs or more. The District is located south of Summit Avenue on the east and west sides of Wazdman Bullock Road. P597 Page 2 June 3, 2009 City Council Staff Report CFD 2000-03 Bonds were issued on September 1, 2005 to shaze in the provision of funds for the acquisition and construction of certain public facilities, park and pazkways improvements to serve property located within the District. This special tax shall be levied only so long as required for each pazcel of taxable property to dischazge bond obligations through the life of the bonds. Attachments: Resolution Exhibit "A" Map P598 RESOLUTION NO. D q ~ ~ / A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, PROVIDING FOR THE LEVY OF SPECIAL TAX "A" FOR COMMUNITY FACILTTIES DISTRICT NO. 2000-03 (RANCHO SUMMIT) FOR TAX YEAR 2009-2010 Recitals WHEREAS, by its Resolution No. 00-190 adopted on September 20, 2000 the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California (the "City Council"), pursuant to the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982 (Section 53311 and following of the California Government Code) (the "Act"), established City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Facilities District No. 2000- 03 (Rancho Summit) (the "District") and authorized, subject to the approval of the qualified electors of the District, the levy of a special tax ("Special Tax `A"') pursuant to the rate and method of apportionment thereof (the "Rate and Method") for the purpose of financing the acquisition or construction of certain authorized public facilities; and WHEREAS, at an election held on October 11, 2000 the qualified electors of the District unanimously approved the levy of Special Tax "A" pursuant to the Rate and Method; and WHEREAS, in 2005 the City Council initiated proceeding to modify the Rate and Method; and WHEREAS, on June 15, 2005, the City Council submitted the proposed modifications to the Rate and Method to the qualified electors of the District; and WHEREAS, on the same day, the qualified electors of the District voted unanimously to authorize the modifications to the Rate and Method (the Rate and Method as modified, the "Amended and Restated Rate and Method"); and WHEREAS, the City Council subsequently enacted Ordinance No. 755 (the "Ordinance") which became effective on August on August 5, 2005, to authorize the levy of Special Tax "A" pursuant to the Amended and Restated Rate and Method; and WHEREAS, the Act provides that the City Council may provide, by resolution, for the levy of Special Tax "A" for any future tax yeaz; and WHEREAS, the City Council desires to provide for the levy Special Tax "A" for Tax Yeaz 2009-2010 pursuant to the Ordinance. NOW THEREFORE, Pf IS HEREBY RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the above recitals aze all true and correct. P599 SECTION 2: That the specific rate and amount of the Special Tax "A" to be collected for Fiscal Yeaz 2009-2010 for the District is hereby determined and established as set forth Exhibit "A" to this Resolution, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. SECTION 3: That the rate as set forth above does not exceed the amount as previously authorized by the Ordinance, and is not in excess of that as previously approved by the qualified electors of the District. SECTION 4: That the proceeds of Special Tax "A" shall be used, in whole or in pazt, for the following: A. payment of debt service on all outstanding bonds issued for the District due in calendaz yeaz 2010; B. payment of a proportionate share of administrative expenses related to the bond and the District; C. payment of any amounts required to replenish the reserve fund established for the bonds; and D. payment for reasonably anticipated Special Tax "A" delinquencies based on the delinquency rate for Special Tax "A" in the preceding tax year. The proceeds of Special Tax "A" shall be used as set forth above, and shall not be used for any other purpose. SECTION 5: Special Tax "A" shall be collected in the same manner as ordinary ad valorem property taxes aze collected, and shall be subject to the same penalties and same procedure and sale in cases of any delinquency for ad valorem taxes, and the Tax Collector is hereby authorized to deduct reasonable administrative costs incurred in collecting any said special tax. SECTION 6: All monies collected pursuant to this Resolution shall be paid into the Community Facilities District funds. SECTION 7: The Auditor of the County is hereby directed to enter in the next county assessment roll on which taxes will become due, opposite each lot or parcel of land effected in a space mazked "public improvements, special tax", or by any other suitable designation, the installment of Special Tax "A," and for the exact rate and amount of said tax, reference is made to the attached Exhibit "A". SECTION 8: The County Auditor shall then, at the close of the tax collection period, promptly render to this Agency a detailed report showing the amount and/or amounts of such special tax installments, interest, penalties and percentages so collected and from what property collected, and also provide a statement of any percentages retained for the expense of making any such collection. P600 Resolution No. Page PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of June 2009. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: Donald J. Kurth, M.D., Mayor ATTEST: Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk I, JANICE C. REYNOLDS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the day of June 2009. Executed this day of June 2009, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk P601 Resolution No. Page CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT N0.2000-03 EXHIBIT "A" The Resolution establishing the annual special tax refers to this Exhibit for an explanation of the rate and method of apportionment of the Special Taxes for Fiscal Year 2009/2010. CLASSIFICATION OF PARCELS Each Fiscal Year, all Taxable Property within CFD No. 2000-03 shall be assigned to a Zone and further classified as Developed Property, Taxable Public Property, Taxable Property Owner Association Property, or Undeveloped Property, and shall be subject to Special Taxes in accordance with this Amended and Restated Rate and Method of Apportionment determined pursuant to Sections A and B below. Residential Property shall be assigned to Land Use Classes 1 through 10 and Non-Residential Property shall be assigned to Land Use Class 11. The Maximum Special Tax for Residential Property shall be based on the Residential Floor Area of the dwelling unit(s) located on the Assessor's Parcel. The Maximum Special Tax for Non-Residential Property shall be based on the Acreage of the Assessor's Parcel. The Maximum Special Tax for any Assessor's Pazcel of Developed Property containing more than one Land Use Class shall be determined pursuant to Section C below. A. MAXIMUM SPECIAL TAX 1. Developed Property (a). Maximum Special Tax The Maximum Special Tax A for each Assessor's Pazcel classified as Developed Property shall be the greater of (i) the amount derived by application of the Assigned Special Tax A or (ii) the amount derived by application of the Backup Special Tax A. (b). Assigned Special Tax A The Fiscal Yeaz 2009-2010 Assigned Special Tax A for each Land Use Class is shown below in the Table below P602 Assigned Special Tax A for Developed Property in City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Facilities District No. 2000-03 (Rancho Summit) Fiscal Year 2009-2010 Land Residential Use Class Description Floor Area Assessors Parcel Numbers Amouut 2 Residential Pro ert 1850 - 2049 s.f. 22649201, 07, 21, 23, 26 $1,899.00 22650204, O6, 10, 20, 22, 27, 28, 38, 45 22650253,57 22651204, 14, 17, 18, 22, 27, 34, 37, 40 22651246, 49, 51, 54, 55, 60, 61, 63, 68 22651270, 71, 74, 76 22652305, 14, 15 22653213, 15, 24, 27, 30, 32, 35, 36 22653306, 08, 10, 11, 13, 14, 15, 17, 21 22653325, 27, 33, 40, 42, 45 3 Residential Pro ert 2050 - 2249 s.f. 22649206, 08, 17, 19, 24 $2,027.00 22650202, 05, 08, 12, 21, 23, 36, 44, 51 22650252, 56, 59 22651201, O5, 09, 15, 19, 23, 25, 28, 50 22651253, 56, 59, 69, 75 22652312,17 22653205, 09, 16, 31, 33 22653318, 29, 37, 39 4 Residential Pro ert 2250 - 2449 s.f. 22610227 $2,046.00 22643209, 37, 50 22644414,21,25 22645205 22649202, 05, 09, 16, 20, 22, 25 22650203, 07, 09, 11, 19, 25, 33, 39, 43 22650246, 49, 54, 55, 58 22651202, 06, 08, 12, 16, 20, 21, 24, 26 22651230, 32, 35, 57, 62, 64, 66 22652302, 11, 13, 16, 23 22651230, 32, 35, 57, 62, 64, 66 22652302, 11, 13, 16, 23 22653204, O8, 14, 17, 21, 25, 28, 37 22653312, 20, 24, 26, 28, 35, 38, 41 P603 5 Residential Pr rt 2450 - 2649 s.f. 22610228 $2,061.00 22643202, 05, 07 11, 13, 14, 15, 20, 22 22643224, 25, 28, 30, 32, 34, 35, 39, 43 22643245, 48, 51, 55, 59, 60 22644401, 03, 05, 07, 09, 10, 12, 13, 16 22644418, 23, 27, 31 22645201,03 22649203,10 22650214, 17, 24, 26, 31, 32, 35, 40, 42 22651207, 11, 31, 33, 36, 39, 41, 43, 45 22651247, 65, 73 22652303, 07, 09, 18, 21 22653201, 03, 07, 11, 12, 19, 23, 26, 29 22653234 22653301, 03, 05, 16, 23, 32, 34, 43 6 Residential Pro ert 2650 - 2849 s.f. 22643204, 08, 12, 16, 26, 29, 36, 38, 40 $2,235.00 22643242, 47, 49, 53, 56 22644402, 04, 11, 15, 19, 24, 28, 30, 32 22649204,18 22650201, 13, 15, 16, 18, 29, 30, 34, 41 22650247, 48, 50 22651203, 10, 13, 29, 38, 42, 44, 48, 52 22651258, 67, 72 22652301, 04, 06, 08, 10, 22 22653202, 06, 10, 18, 20, 22 22653302, 04, 07, 09, 19, 22, 30, 31, 36 22653344,46 7 Residential Pro ert 2850 - 3049 s.f. 22643201, 03, 06, 10, 19, 21, 23, 27, 31 $2,462.00 22643233, 41, 44, 46, 54, 58 22644406, 08, 17, 20, 22, 26, 29 22645202,04 11 Residential Pro ert N/A 22649211, 12-15 $1,644.63 (c). Assigned Special Tax A The Fiscal Year 2009-2010 Assigned Special Tax A, identified in the Table above, shall not be subject to change and shall therefore remain the same in every Fiscal Year. P604 (d). Backup Special Tax A The Fiscal Year 2009-2010 Backup Special Tax A for an Assessor's Pazcel of Developed Property in Zone 1 shall equal $9,601 per Acre or portion thereof. The Fiscal Yeaz 2009-2010 Backup Special Tax A for an Assessor's Parcel of Developed Property in Zone 2 shall equal $14,824 per Acre or portion thereof. The Backup Special Tax A applicable to Zone 1 or Zone 2 shall not be subject to change and shall therefore remain the same in every Fiscal Year. (e). Multiple Land Use Classes In some instances an Assessor's Parcel of Developed Property may contain more than one Land Use Class. The Maximum Special Tax levied on an Assessor's Pazcel shall be the sum of the Maximum Special Taxes for all Land Use Classes located on that Assessor's Pazcel. For an Assessor's Parcel that contains both Residential Property and Non-Residential Property, the Acreage of such Assessor's Pazcel shall be allocated to each type of property based on the amount of Acreage designated for each land use as determined by reference to the site plan approved for such Assessor's Pazcel. The CFD Administrator's allocation to each type of property shall be final. 2. Undeveloped Property, Taxable Public Property, and Taxable Property Owner Association Property (a). Maximum Special Tax A The Fiscal Yeaz 2009-2010 Maximum Special Tax A for Undeveloped Property, Taxable Public Property, and Taxable Property Owner Association Property in Zone 1 or Zone 2 shall be $14,824 per Acre or portion thereof. (b).Maximum Special Tax The Fiscal Year 2009-2010 Maximum Special Tax A for Undeveloped Property, Taxable Public Property, and Taxable Property Owner Association Property shall not be subject to change and shall therefore remain the same in every Fiscal Yeaz. B. METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT OF THE SPECIAL TAX Special Tax A Commencing with Fiscal Yeaz 2006-2007 and for each following Fiscal Year, the Council shall determine the Special Tax Requirement for Facilities and shall levy the P605 Special Tax A until the total Special Tax A levy equals the Special Tax Requirement for Facilities. The Special Tax A shall be levied each Fiscal Year as follows: First: The Special Tax A shall be levied on each Assessor's Pazcel of Developed Property in an amount equal to 100% of the applicable Assigned Special Tax A; Second: If additional monies are needed to satisfy the Special Tax Requirement for Facilities after the first step has been completed, the Special Tax A shall be levied Proportionately on each Assessor's Pazcel of Undeveloped Property at up to 100% of the Maximum Special Tax A for Undeveloped Property; Third: If additional monies aze needed to satisfy the Special Tax Requirement for Facilities after the first two steps have been completed, then the levy of the Special Tax A on each Assessor's Pazcel of Developed Property in Zone 1 and Zone 2 whose Maximum Special Tax A is determined through the application of the Backup Special Tax A shall be increased in equal percentages from the Assigned Special Tax A up to the Maximum Special Tax A for each such Assessor's Pazcel; Fourth: If additional monies aze needed to satisfy the Special Tax Requirement for Facilities after the first three steps have been completed, then the Special Tax A shall be levied Proportionately on each Assessor's Pazcel of Taxable Public Property and Taxable Property Owner Association Property at up to the Maximum Special Tax A for Taxable Public Property and Taxable Property Owner Association Property. Notwithstanding the above the Council may, in any Fiscal Year, levy Proportionately less than 100% of the Assigned Special Tax A in step one (above), when (i) the Council is no longer required to levy the Special Tax A pursuant to steps two through four above in order to meet the Special Tax Requirement for Facilities; and (ii) all authorized Bonds have already been issued or the Council has covenanted that it will not issue any additional Bonds (except refunding bonds) to be supported by the Special Tax A. Further notwithstanding the above, under no circumstances will the Special Tax A levied against any Assessor's Parcel of Residential Property for which an occupancy permit for private residential use has been issued be increased by more than ten percent as a consequence of delinquency or default by the owner of any other Assessor's Pazcel within CFD No. 2000-03. C. EXEMPTIONS 1. Special Tax A No Special Tax A shall be levied on up to 21.88 Acres of Public Property and/or Property Owner Association Property in Zone 1 and up to 38.41 Acres of Public Property and/or Property Owner Association Property in Zone 2. Tax-exempt status will be assigned by the CFD Administrator in the chronological order in which property becomes Public Property or Property Owner Association Property. P606 However, should an Assessor's Parcel no longer be classified as Public Property or Property Owner Association Property, its tax-exempt status will be revoked. Public Property or Property Owner Association Property that is not exempt from the Special Tax A under this section shall be subject to the levy of the Special Tax A and shall be taxed Proportionately as part of the fourth step in Section D.1 above, at up to 100% of the applicable Maximum Special Tax A for Taxable Public Property or Taxable Property Owner Association Property. D. APPEALS AND INTERPRETATIONS Any landowner or resident who feels that the amount of the Special Tax levied on their Assessor's Pazcel is in error may submit a written appeal to CFD No. 2000-03. The CFD Administrator shall review the appeal and if the CFD Administrator concurs, the amount of the Special Tax levied shall be appropriately modified. The Council may interpret this Amended and Restated Rate and Method of Apportionment for purposes of clarifying any ambiguity and make determinations relative to the annual administration of the Special Tax and any landowner or resident appeals. Any decision of the Council shall be final and binding as to all persons. E. MANNER OF COLLECTION The Special Tax A will be collected in the same manner and at the same time as ordinazy ad valorem property taxes; provided, however, that CFD No. 2000-03 may directly bill the Special Tax, may collect Special Taxes at a different time or in a different manner if necessary to meet its financial obligations, and may covenant to foreclose and may actually foreclose on delinquent Assessor's Pazcels as permitted by the Act. F. PREPAYMENT OF SPECIAL TAX A "Previously Issued Bonds" means, for any Fiscal Yeaz, all Outstanding Bonds that aze deemed to be outstanding under the Indenture after the first interest and/or principal payment date following the current Fiscal Year. Only an Assessor's Parcel of Developed Property, or Undeveloped Property for which a building permit has been issued, may be prepaid. The Special Tax A obligation applicable to an Assessor's Parcel in CFD No. 2000-03 may only be prepaid after all authorized Bonds have already been issued, or after the Council has covenanted that it will not issue any additional Bonds (except refunding bonds) to be supported by the Special Tax A levy under this Amended and Restated Rate and Method of Apportionment. The obligation of the Assessor's Parcel to pay any Special Tax A may be permanently satisfied as described herein, provided that a prepayment may be made with respect to a particular Assessor's Pazcel only if there aze no delinquent Special Taxes with respect to such Assessor's Parcel at the time of prepayment. An owner of an Assessor's Pazcel intending to prepay the Special Tax A obligation shall P607 provide the CFD Administrator with written notice of intent to prepay. Within 30 days of receipt of such written notice, the CFD Administrator shall notify such owner of the prepayment amount for such Assessor's Pazcel. The CFD Administrator may charge a reasonable fee for providing this service. Prepayment must be made not less than 45 days prior to the next occurring date that notice of redemption of Bonds from the proceeds of such prepayment may be given by the Trustee pursuant to the Indenture. The Special Tax A Prepayment Amount (defined below) shall be calculated as summarized below (capitalized terms as defined below): Bond Redemption Amount plus Redemption Premium plus Defeasance Amount plus Administrative Fees and Expenses less Reserve Fund Credit less Canitalized Interest Credit Total: equals Prepayment Amount As of the proposed date of prepayment, the Special Tax A Prepayment Amount (defined below) shall be calculated as follows: 1. Confirm that no Special Tax delinquencies apply to such Assessor's Parcel. 2. For Assessor's Pazcels of Developed Property, compute the Assigned Special Tax A and Backup Special Tax A for the Assessor's Pazcel to be prepaid. For Assessor's Pazcels of Undeveloped Property for which building permits have already been issued, compute the Assigned Special Tax A and Backup Special Tax A for the Assessor's Parce] to be prepaid as though it were already designated as Developed Property, based upon the building permit which has been issued for that Assessor's Pazcel. 3. (a) Divide the Assigned Special Tax A computed pursuant to pazagraph 2 by the total estimated Assigned Special Tax A for CFD No. 2000-03 based on the Developed Property Special Tax A which could be chazged in the current Fiscal Year on all expected development in CFD No. 2000-03, excluding any Assessor's Parcels for which the Specia] Tax A has been prepaid, and (b) Divide the Backup Special Tax A computed pursuant to paragraph 2 by the total estimated Backup Special Tax A which could be chazged in the current Fiscal Yeaz on all expected development in CFD No. 2000-03, excluding any Assessor's Pazcels for which the Special Tax A has been prepaid. 4. Multiply the lazger quotient computed pursuant to pazagraph 3(a) or 3(b) by the Previously Issued Bonds to compute the amount of Previously Issued Bonds to be retired and prepaid (the "Bond Redemption Amount"). P608 5. Multiply the Bond Redemption Amount computed pursuant to pazagraph 4 by the applicable redemption premium (e.g., the redemption price-100%), if any, on the Previously Issued Bonds to be redecmed (the "Redemption Premium"). 6. Compute the amount needed to pay interest on the Bond Redemption Amount from the first bond interest and/or principal payment date not covered by the current Fiscal Year Special Tax A levy until the eazliest redemption date for the Previously Issued Bonds. 7. Determine the Special Tax A levied on the Assessor's Pazcel in the current Fiscal Yeaz which has not yet been paid. 8. Add the amounts computed pursuant to pazagraphs 6 and 7. 9. Compute the net present value of the amount computed pursuant to pazagraph 8, using as a discount rate the rate of return reasonably assumed for the conservative investment of these funds by the CFD Administrator (the "Defeasance Amount"). 10. The administrative fees and expenses of CFD No. 2000-03 aze as calculated by the CFD Administrator and include the costs of computation of the prepayment, the costs to invest the prepayment proceeds, the costs of redeeming Bonds, and the costs of recording any notices to evidence the prepayment and the redemption (the "Administrative Fees and Expenses"). 11. The reserve fund credit (the "Reserve Fund Credit") shall equal the lesser of: (a) the expected reduction in the reserve requirement (as defined in the Indenture), if any, associated with the redemption of Previously Issued Bonds as a result of the prepayment, or (b) the amount derived by subtracting the new reserve requirement (as defined in the Indenture) in effect after the redemption of Previously Issued Bonds as a result of the prepayment from the balance in the reserve fund on the prepayment date, but in no event shall such amount be less than zero. No Reserve Fund Credit shall be granted if the amount then on deposit in the reserve fund for the Previously Issued Bonds is below 100% of the reserve requirement (as defined in the Indenture). 12. If any capitalized interest for the Previously Issued Bonds will not have been expended as of the date immediately following the first bond interest and/or principal payment date following the current Fiscal Yeaz, a capitalized interest credit shall be calculated by multiplying the lazger quotient computed pursuant to paragraph 3(a) or 3(b) by the expected balance in the capitalized interest fund or account under the Indenture after such first interest and/or principal payment (the "Capitalized Interest Credit"). 13. The Special Tax A prepayment is equal to the sum of the amounts computed pursuant to pazagraphs 4, 5, 9 and 10, less the amounts computed pursuant to paragraphs 11 and 12 (the "Prepayment Amount"). P609 From the Prepayment Amount, the amounts computed pursuant to pazagraphs 4, 5, 9, 11 and 12 shall be deposited into the appropriate fund as established under the Indenture and be used to retire Previously Issued Bonds, as applicable, or make scheduled debt service payments. The amount computed pursuant to paragraph 10 shall be retained by CFD No. 2000-03. The Special Tax A Prepayment Amount maybe insufficient to redeem a full $5,000 increment of Bonds. In such cases, the increment above $5,000 or integral multiple thereof will be retained in the appropriate fund established under the Indenture to be used with the next prepayment of Bonds or to make scheduled debt service payments on such bonds. Upon confirmation of the payment of the current Fiscal Yeaz's Special Tax A levy as determined under pazagraph 7 (above), the CFD Administrator shall remove the current Fiscal Yeaz's Special Tax A lery for such Assessor's Pazcel from the County tax rolls. With respect to any Assessor's Pazcel for which the Special Tax A obligation is prepaid in full in accordance with this Section, the Council shall cause a suitable notice to be recorded in compliance with the Act, to indicate the prepayment of the Special Tax A and the release of the Special Tax A lien on such Assessor's Pazcel, and the obligation of such Assessor's Pazcel to pay the Special Tax A shall cease. Notwithstanding the foregoing, no Special Tax A prepayment shall be allowed unless, at the time of such proposed prepayment, the amount of Maximum Special Tax A that maybe levied on Taxable Property within CFD No. 2000-03 (after excluding 21.88 Acres of Public Property and/or Property Owner Association Property in Zone 1 and 38.41 Acres of Public Property and/or Property Owner Association Property in Zone 2 as set forth in Section C) both prior to and after the proposed prepayment is at least 1.1 times the maximum annual debt service on all Previously Issued Bonds, plus the Administrative Expenses. G. TERM OF SPECIAL TAX The Special Tax A shall be levied for a period not to exceed fifty years, provided however that the Special Tax A will cease to be levied in an earlier Fiscal Year if the CFD Administrator has determined that all required interest and principal payments on the Bonds have been paid. P610 M _" C "' ~ O O ~ N J o w , ~ `'' ~ Q U U ~ y ~ ~•x1 ~ o d ,y ~ J ~ o ,O ~ .._.._.._.._ ~ N YI ~ C _ O r J m ~ ~~ • - ~ ~ 3 O ~ m O (~ 1 LL Q _.._.._inV lse3 in ~ ~ L R =' ~ ny epuen~l33 ® ny epuennl33 C j ~9 ~laa~~ ea . _. 0 ~ V ny ~alsayooa • ny ~alsayooa r"~ i ny ua~l!IIlW ~ .._.._.._.._ ny ua~i!II!W i i i ny uaneH • ny uaneH i i ny esow~aH ~ ny esow~aH i nV Pleq!yo~`d; n`d Ple4!4o~b' ! ! ~~ ~ ny uewllaH ny uewllaH i ~ L I rf •• '~ V ~ ny p eRau!n 5 3S uellawe~ ~ S3pp€~g~;s~~~€ ! v t+ 9.'{p~s~EaE~~ ~.._.._. ~. _ ~ ._..r•-_ ny anal c~eEa~~~~;-~ E..~. .~•• (n C m ~ ~ yyES ~ E~~~E @ggE ~ C m LL Q a5l ~i~~E Rgs$ ~ -g€ > sEE `~ m `S~~if9~A~' 03 = iE'~$'~°E ~ E~ ~ fEPo ~~Ea~. $L T H E C I T Y O F RANCHO C U C A M O N G A SICI.l.l l\~l 1. DATE: June 3, 2009 TO: Mayor and Members of City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: John R. Gillison, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services BY: Ingrid Y. Bruce, GIS/Special Districts Manager SUBJECT: APPROVAL TO SET ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT N0.2001-O1 (IMPROVEMENT AREA NOS. 1 & 2), SERIES 2001-A WITH NO INCREASE TO THE CURRENT RATE. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached Resolution setting the annual special tax for the new Community Facilities District No. 2001-01 (Improvement Area Nos. 1 & 2), Series 2001-A. Pursuant to Section 53340 and 53358 of the Government Code Mello-Roos Community Facilities District Act of 1982, the City Council is authorized to annually levy the tax rate to pay debt service on the bonds. There is no increase to the current rate for fiscal year 2009/2010. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS On June 20, 2001, an election was held and the property owners within the boundary of Community Facilities District No. 2001-01 (Improvement Area Nos. 1 and 2), Series 2001-A authorized the district to incur bonded indebtedness in the principal amount of $14,240,000. On August 15, 2001 the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 01-019 authorizing the issuance of bonds. Bonds were issued on August 29, 2001 to share in the financing of public street improvements required for the development of the property within the District, including improvements to Day Creek Boulevazd, Victoria Park Lane, Church Street, Foothill Boulevazd, Baseline Road and Arbor Way, landscaping improvements within public right-of- way, storm drain and flood control improvements. P611 P612 Page 2 June 3, 2009 City Council Staff Report CFD 2001-O1 (Improvement Area Nos. 1 & 2) This special tax shall be levied only so long as required for each pazcel of taxable property to discharge bond obligations through the life of the bonds. The levy of special taxes annually for Improvement Area No. 1 and Improvement Area No. 2 aze as follows: Imarovement Area No. 1 Land Use Class Description Residential Floor Area Assigned S ecial Tax 1 Single Family Property => 3,250 sq. ft. $2,100 per residential dwelling unit 2 Single Family Property 2,950 to 3,249 sq. ft. $1,684 per residential dwelling unit 3 Single Family Property 2,650 to 2,949 sq. ft. $1,5 ] 5 per residential dwelling unit 4 Single Family Property 2,350 to 2,649 sq. ft. $1,301 per residential dwelling unit 5 Single Family Property 2,150 to 2,349 sq. ft. $1,217 per residential dwelling unit 6 Single Family Property 1,950 to 2,149 sq. ft. $1,119 per residential dwelling unit 7 Single Family Property < 1,950 sq. ft. $938 per residential dwelling unit 8 Apartment Property Not Applicable $237 per residential dwelling unit 9 Non Residential Property Not Applicable $8,398 per Acre Improvement Area No. 2 Land Use Description Assigned Special Tax Class 1 Apartment Property $237 per unit 2 Other Residential $10,768 per Acre Property 3 Non-Residential $0.63 per square foot of Non- Property Residential Floor Area P613 Page 3 June 3, 2009 City Council Staff Report CFD 2001-01 (Improvement Area Nos. 1 & 2) Attachments: Resolution Exhibit "A" Map RESOLUTION NO. D9' ~~ S A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RE-ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 2001-O1 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2009- 2010 (IMPROVEMENT AREA NOS. 1 & 2), SERIES 2001-A Recitals WHEREAS, by its Resolution No. 01-162, adopted on June 20, 2001, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California (the "City Council"), pursuant to the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982 (Section 53311 and following of the California Government Code) (the "Act") established City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Facilities District No. 2001-01 (the "District") and established within the District improvement areas designated Improvement Area No. 1 and Improvement Area No. 2 (the "Improvement Areas"); and WHEREAS, at an election held on June 20, 2001, the qualified electors of the Improvement Area No. 1 and Improvement Area No. 2 unanimously approved the levy of a special tax against properties in the Improvement Areas (the "Special Tax"); and WHEREAS, by its Ordinance No. 658 (the "Ordinance"), adopted on July 18, 2001, the City Council authorized the levy of the Special Tax in accordance with the Act; and WHEREAS, on September 18, 2001, the District delivered its $14,240,000 City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Facilities District No. 2001-O1 Improvement Area No. 1 and Improvement Area No. 2 Special Tax Bonds Series 2001-A (the "Bonds"); and WHEREAS, in a Fiscal Agent Agreement dated as of August 1, 2001, by and between the City and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (the "Fiscal Agent"), the City covenanted to fix and levy the Special Tax within the Improvement Area No. 1 and Improvement Area No. 2 for each fiscal year in an amount required for the payment of principal and interest on the Bonds becoming due and payable during that fiscal year, plus administrative expenses, but taking into account certain balances in funds held by the Fiscal Agent (the "Covenant"); and WHEREAS, debt service will become due and payable on the Bonds during Fiscal Year 2008-2009 in an amount exceeding funds held by the Fiscal Agent and designated for the payment for such debt service; and WHEREAS, the City Council intends to levy the Special Tax for Fiscal Yeaz 2009-2010 as authorized by the Ordinance and required by the Covenant; and WHEREAS, the City Council intends to provide for the collection of such Special Tax for Fiscal Yeaz 2009-2010 by City staff. NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: P614 SECTION I : That the above recitals are all true and correct. P615 SECTION 2: That the specific rate and amount of the Special Tax to be collected to pay for the costs and expenses for Fiscal Year 2009-2010 for the District is hereby determined and established as set forth Exhibit "A" to this Resolution, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference SECTION 3: That the rate as set forth above does not exceed the amount as previously authorized by Ordinance of this legislative body, and is not in excess of that as previously approved by the qualified electors of the District. SECTION 4: That the proceeds of the Special Tax shall be used to pay, in whole or in part, the costs of the following, in the following order of priority: A. Payment of principal and interest on any outstanding authorized bonded indebtedness; B. Necessary replenishment of bond reserve funds or other reserve funds; C. Payment of costs and expenses of authorized public facilities and public services, and incidental expenses pursuant to the Act; and D. Repayment of advances and loans, if appropriate. The proceeds of the special taxes shall be used as set forth above, and shall not be used for any other purpose. SECTION 5: The special tax shall be collected in the same manner as ordinary ad valorem property taxes are collected, and shall be subject to the same penalties and same procedure and sale in cases of any delinquency for ad valorem taxes, and the Tax Collector is hereby authorized to deduct reasonable administrative costs incurred in collecting any said special tax. SECTION 6: All monies collected pursuant to this Resolution shall be paid into the Community Facilities District funds, including any bond fund and reserve fund. SECTION 7: The Auditor of the County is hereby directed to enter in the next county assessment roll on which taxes will become due, opposite each lot or pazcel of land effected in a space mazked "public improvements, special tax", or by any other suitable designation, the installment of the special tax, and for the exact rate and amount of said tax, reference is made to the attached Exhibit "A". SECTION 8: The County Auditor shall then, at the close of the tax collection period, promptly render to this Agency a detailed report showing the amount and/or amounts of such special tax installments, interest, penalties and percentages so collected and from what property collected, and also provide a statement of any percentages retained for the expense of making any such collection. P616 PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of June 2009. Donald J. Kurth, M.D., Mayor ATTEST: Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk I, JANICE C. REYNOLDS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Califomia, at a regulaz meeting of said City Council held on the day of June 2009. Executed this day of June 2009, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk P617 Resolution No. Page CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT N0.2001-O1 (IMPROVEMENT AREA NO. 1 & IMPROVEMENT AREA N0.2) SERIES 2001-A EXHIBIT "A" The Resolution establishing the annual special tax refers to this Exhibit for an explanation of the rate and method of apportionment of the Special Taxes for Fiscal Year 2009/2010. CLASSIFICATION OF PARCELS Improvement Area No. 1 Each Fiscal Yeaz, all Taxable Property within Improvement Area No. 1 shall be classified as Developed Property, Final Mapped Property, Taxable Property Owner Association Property, Taxable Public Property, or Undeveloped Property, and all such Taxable Property shall be subject to the levy of Special Taxes in accordance with the rate and method of apportionment determined pursuant to the sections below. MAXIMUM SPECIAL TAX RATE I. Developed Property (a) Maximum Special Tax The Maximum Special Tax for each Assessor's Parcel classified as Developed Property shall be the greater of (i) the amount derived by application of the Assigned Special tax or (ii) the amount derived by application of the Backup Special Tax. (b) Assigned Special Tax The Assigned Special Tax for each Land Use class is shown in Table 1. P618 TABLE 1 Assigned Special Taxes For Developed Property Improvement Area No. 1 Land Use Class Description Residential Floor Area Assigned S ecial Tax 1 Single Family Property = > 3,250 sq. ft. $2,100 per residential dwelling unit 2 Single Family Property 2,950 to 3,249 sq. ft. $1,684 per residential dwelling unit 3 Single Family Property 2,650 to 2,949 sq. ft. $1,515 per residential dwelling unit 4 Single Family Property 2,350 to 2,649 sq. ft. $1,301 per residential dwelling unit 5 Single Family Property 2,150 to 2,349 sq. ft. $1,217 per residential dwelling unit 6 Single Family Property 1,950 to 2,149 sq. ft. $1,119 per residential dwelling unit 7 Single Family Property < 1,950 sq. ft. $938 per residential dwelling unit 8 Apartment Property Not Applicable $237 per residential dwelling unit 9 Non Residential Property Not Applicable $8,398 per Acre (c). Multiple Land Use Classes In some instances an assessor's Pazcel of Developed Property may contain more than one Land Use Class. The Assigned Special tax levied on an Assessor's Parcel shall be the sum of the Assigned Special Taxes for all Land Use Classes located on that Assessor's Parcel. The Maximum Special Tax that can be levied on an Assessor's Pazcel shall be the sum of the Maximum Special Taxes that can be levied for all Land Use Classes located on that Assessor's Pazcel derived by application of the Backup Special Tax. For an Assessor's Pazcel that contains both Residential Property and Non-Residential Property, the Acreage of such Assessor's Parcel shall be allocated to each type of property based on the amount of Acreage designated for each Land Use Class as determined by reference to the site plan approved for such Assessor's Pazcel. The CFD Administrator's allocation to each type of property shall be final. P619 (c) Backup Special Tax The Backup Special Tax shall equal $10, 768 per acre. 2. Final Mapped Property (a). Intermediate Special Tax The Intermediate Special Tax shall only be levied on Assessor's Pazcels of the Final Mapped Property. To compute the Intermediate Special Tax attributable to a Final Subdivision, the Acreage of all Developed Property and Final Mapped Property within that Final Subdivision shall be multiplied by $7,500. The Intermediate Special Tax for each Assessor's Pazcel of Final Mapped Property planned for residential development shall then be computed by dividing the Intermediate Special Tax attributable to the applicable Final Subdivision by the total number of Assessor's Pazcels planned for residential development within that Final Subdivision (i.e., the number of residential lots). The Intermediate Special Tax for each Assessor's Parcel of Final Mapped Property in a Final Subdivision planned exclusively for non-residential development shall equal $7,500 multiplied by the Acreage of such Assessor's Pazcel. If a final Subdivision includes Assessor's Parcels of Developed Property and Final Mapped Property planned for both residential and non-residential development, then the Intermediate Special Tax for each Assessor's Parcel of Final Mapped Property planned for residential development shall be calculated as described above based exclusively on the Acreage of the residential Final Mapped Property. Conversely, the Intermediate Special Tax for each assessor's Pazcel of Final Mapped Property planned for non- residential development shall be calculated as described above based exclusively on the Acreage of the non-residential Final Mapped Property. The CFD Administrator shall allocate the Acreage of each Assessor's Pazcel in the Final Subdivision to residential and non-residential development based on the projected use of each such Assessor's Pazcel. (b) Maximum Special Tax The Maximum Special Tax for Final Mapped Property shall be $10,768 per Acre. 3. Taxable Property Owner Association Property, Taxable Public Property, and Undeveloped Property. The Maximum Special Tax for Taxable Property Owner Association Property, Taxable Public Property, and Undeveloped Property shall be $10, 768 per Acre. P620 APPORTIONMENT OF SPECIAL TAX For each Fiscal Year the Council shall determine the Special Tax Requirement and levy the Special Tax, taking into consideration the levy of the Improvement Area No. 2 (I A No. 2) Special Tax, until the amount of Special Taxes and Improvement Area No. 2 Special Taxes equal the Special Tax Requirement. The Special Tax shall be levied each Fiscal Yeaz as follows: First: The Special Tax shall be levied on each Assessor's Parcel of Developed Property in an amount equal to 100% of the applicable Assigned Special Tax; and the City Council shall be notified by the CFD Administrator that under the terms of I A No. 2 Rate and Method (RMA), the I A No. 2 Special Tax shall be levied on each Assessor's Pazcel of I A No. 2 Developed Property in an amount equal to 100% of the applicable I A No. 2 Assigned Special Tax; Second: If additional monies aze needed to satisfy the Special Tax Requirement after the first step has been completed, the Special tax shall be levied on each assessor's Parcel of Final Mapped Property at up to 100% of the Intermediate Special Tax for Final Mapped Property; and the City Council shall be notified by the CFD Administrator that under the terms of I A No. 2 RMA, the I A No. 2 Special Tax shall be levied on each Assessor's Parcel of I A No. 2 Final Mapped Property up to 100% of the I A No. 2 Intermediate Special Tax for I A No. 2 Final Mapped Property, with the levy on Final Mapped Property and I A No. 2 Final Mapped Property being Proportionate; Third: If additional monies are needed to satisfy the Special tax Requirement after the first two steps have been completed, the Special Tax shall be levied on each Assessor's Parcel of Undeveloped Property at up $7,500 per acre; and the City Council shall be notified by the CFD Administrator that under the terms of the I A No. 2 RMA, the I A No. 2 RMA, the I A No. 2 Special Tax shall be levied on each Assessor's Pazcel of I A No. 2 Underdeveloped Property at up to $7,500 per Acre, with the levy on Undeveloped Property and I A No. 2 Undeveloped Property being Proportionate; Fourth: If additional monies are needed to satisfy the Special Tax Requirement after the first steps have been completed, the Special Tax shall be levied on each Assessor's Parcel of Final Mapped Property and Undeveloped Property at up to 100% of the Maximum Special Tax for Final Mapped Property and Undeveloped Property; and the City Council shall be notified by the CFD Administrator that under the terms of the I A No. 2 RMA, the I A No. 2 Special Tax shall be levied on each Assessor's Parcel of I A No. 2 Final Mapped Property and I A No. 2 Undeveloped Property at up to 100% of the I A No. 2 Maximum Special Tax for I A No. 2 Final Mapped Property and I A No. 2 Undeveloped Property, with the levy on Final Mapped Property and Undeveloped Property and I A No. 2 Final Mapped Property and I A No. 2 Undeveloped Property being Proportionate; Fifth: If additional monies are needed to satisfy the Special Tax Requirement after the first four steps have been completed, then the levy of the Special Tax on each Assessor's Pazcel of Developed Property whose Maximum Special Tax is determined through the application of the Backup Special Tax shall be increased in equal percentages from the Assigned Special Tax up to P621 the Maximum Special Tax for each such Assessor's Parcel; and the City Council shall be notified by the CFD Administrator that under the terms of the I A No. 2 RMA, the levy of the I A No. 2 Special Tax on each Assessor's Parcel of I A No. 2 Developed Property whose I A No. 2 Maximum Special Tax is determined through the application of the I A No. 2 Backup Special Tax shall be increased in equal percentages from the I A No. 2 Assigned Special Tax up to the I A No. 2 Maximum Special Tax for each such Assessor's Parcel, with the levy on Developed Property and I A No. 2 Developed Property being Proportionate; Sixth: If additional monies aze needed to satisfy the Special Tax Requirement after the first five steps have been completed, then the Special Tax shall be levied on each Assessor's Pazcel of Taxable Property Owner Association Property or Taxable Public Property at up to the Maximum Special Tax for Taxable Property Owner Association Property or Taxable Public Property; and the City Council shall be notified by the CFD Administrator that under the terms of the I A No. 2 RMA, the I A No. 2 Special Tax shall be levied on each Assessor's Pazcel of I A No. 2 Taxable Property Owner Association Property or I A No. 2 Taxable Public Property at up to the I A No. 2 Maximum Special Tax for I A No. 2 Taxable Property Owner Association Property or I A No. 2 Taxable Public Property, with the levy on Taxable Property Owner Association Property or Taxable Public Property and I A No. 2 Taxable Property Owner Association Property or I A No. 2 Taxable Public Property being Proportionate. Notwithstanding the above the city Council may, in any Fiscal Yeaz, levy proportionately less than 100% of the Assigned Special Tax and the I A No. 2 Assigned Special Tax in step one (above) when (i) the City Council is no longer required to levy a Special Tax pursuant to steps two through six above and the City Council is no longer required to levy an I A No. 2 Special Tax pursuant to steps two through six (above) of the I A No. 2 RMA in order to meet the Special Tax Requirement; (ii) all authorized I A No. 1 and I A No. 2 Bonds have already been issued or the City Council has covenanted that it will not issue any additional I A No. 1 and I A No. 2 Bonds (except refunding bonds) to be supported by Special Taxes and I A No. 2 Special Taxes; and (iii) all Authorized Facilities have been constructed and/or acquired. Further notwithstanding the above, under no circumstances will the Special Tax levied against any Assessor's Pazcel or Residential Property for which an occupancy permit for private residential use has been issued be increased by more than ten percent as a consequence of delinquency or default by the owner of any other Assessor's Pazcel within I A No. 1 or I A No. 2, except for those Residential Properties whose owners aze also delinquent or in default on their Special Tax payments for one or more other properties within I A No. 1 or I A No. 2. P622 CLASSIFICATION OF PARCELS Improvement Area No. 2 Each Fiscal Yeaz, all Taxable Property within Improvement Area No. 2 shall be classified as Developed Property, Final Mapped Property, Taxable Property Owner Association Property, Taxable Public Property, or Undeveloped Property, and all such Taxable Property shall be subject to the levy of Special Taxes in accordance with the rate and method of apportionment determined pursuant to the Sections III, N and V below. MAXIMUM SPECIAL TAX RATE 1. Developed Property (a) Maximum Special Tax The Maximum Special Tax for each Assessor's Parcel classified as Developed Property shall be the greater of (i) the amount derived by application of the Assigned Special tax or (ii) the amount derived by application of the Backup Special Tax. (b) Assigned Special Tax The Assigned Special Tax for each Land Use class is shown in Table 1. TABLE 1 Assigned Special Taxes For Developed Property Improvement Area No. 2 Land Use Description Assigned Special Tax Class 1 Apartment Property $237 per unit 2 Other Residential $10,768 per Acre Pro ert 3 Non-Residential $0.63 per squaze foot of Non- Property Residential Floor Area P623 (c). Multiple Land Use Classes In some instances an Assessor's Parcel of Developed Property may contain more than one Land Use Class. The Assigned Special Tax levied on an Assessor's Pazcel shall be the sum of the Assigned Special Taxes for all Land Use Classes located on that Assessor's Pazcel. The Maximum Special Tax that can be levied on an Assessor's Pazcel shall be the sum of the Maximum Special Taxes that can be levied for all Land Use Classes located on that Assessor's Parcel derived by application of the Backup Special Tax. For an Assessor's Pazcel that contains both Residential Property and Non-Residential Property, the Acreage of such Assessor's Parcel shall be allocated to each type of property based on the amount of Acreage designated for each Land Use Class as determined by reference to the site plan approved for such Assessor's Parcel. The CFD Administrator's allocation to each type of property shall be final. (c) Backup Special Tax The Backup Special Tax shall equal $10, 061 per acre. 2. Final Mapped Property (a). Intermediate Special Tax The Intermediate Special Tax shall only be levied on Assessor's Parcels of the Final Mapped Property. To compute the Intermediate Special Tax attributable to a Final Subdivision, the Acreage of all Developed Property and Final Mapped Property within that Final Subdivision shall be multiplied by $7,500. The Intermediate Special Tax for each Assessor's Pazcel of Final Mapped Property planned for residential development shall then be computed- by dividing the Intermediate Special Tax attributable to the applicable Final Subdivision by the total number of Assessor's Pazcels planned for residential development within that Final Subdivision (i.e., the number of residential lots). The Intermediate Special Tax for each Assessor's Pazcel of Final Mapped Property in a Final Subdivision planned exclusively for non-residential development shall equal $7,500 multiplied by the Acreage of such Assessor's Pazcel. If a final Subdivision includes Assessor's Parcels of Developed Property and Final Mapped Property planned for both residential and non-residential development, then the Intermediate Special Tax for each Assessor's Parcel of Final Mapped Property planned for residential development shall be calculated as described above based exclusively on the Acreage of the P624 residential Final Mapped Property. Conversely, the Intermediate Special Tax for each Assessor's Pazcel of Final Mapped Property planned for non- residential development shall be calculated as described above based exclusively on the Acreage of the non-residential Final Mapped Property. The CFD Administrator shall allocate the Acreage of each Assessor's Pazcel in the Final Subdivision to residential and non-residential development based on the projected use of each such Assessor's Pazcel. (c) Maximum Special Tax The Maximum Special Tax for Final Mapped Property shall be $10,768 per Acre. 3. Taxable Property Owner Association Property, Taxable Public Property, and Undeveloped Property. The Maximum Special Tax for Taxable Property Owner Association Property, Taxable Public Property, and Undeveloped Property shall be $10, 768 per Acre. APPORTIONMENT OF SPECIAL TAX For each Fiscal Yeaz the City Council shall determine the Special Tax Requirement and levy the Special Tax, taking into consideration the levy of the Improvement Area No. 1 (I A No. 1) Special Tax, until the amount of Special Taxes and Improvement Area No. 1 Special Taxes equal the Special Tax Requirement. The Special Tax shall be levied each Fiscal Yeaz as follows: First: The Special Tax shall be levied on each Assessor's Parcel of Developed Property in an amount equal to 100% of the applicable Assigned Special Tax; and the City Council shall be notified by the CFD Administrator that under the terms of I A No. 1 Rate and Method (RMA), the I A No. 1 Special Tax shall be levied on each Assessor's Parcel of I A No. 1 Developed Property in an amount equal to 100% of the applicable I A No. 1 Assigned Special Tax; Second: If additional monies are needed to satisfy the Special Tax Requirement after the first step has been completed, the Special tax shall be levied on each Assessor's Pazcel of Final Mapped Property at up to 100% of the Intermediate Special Tax for Final Mapped Property; and the City Council shall be notified by the CFD Administrator that under the terms of I A No. 1 RMA, the I A No. 1 Special Tax shall be levied on each Assessor's Parcel of I A No. 1 Final Mapped Property up to 100% of the I A No. 1 Intermediate Special Tax for I A No. 1 Final Mapped Property, with the levy on Final Mapped Property and I A No. 1 Final Mapped Property being Proportionate; Third: If additional monies aze needed to satisfy the Special tax Requirement after the first two steps have been completed, the Special Tax shall be levied on each Assessor's Parcel of Undeveloped Property at up $7,500 per acre; and the City Council shall be notified by the CFD Administrator that under the terms of the I A No. 1 RMA, the I A No. 1 Special Tax shall be P625 levied on each Assessor's Parcel of I A No. 1 Underdeveloped Property at up to $7,500 per Acre, with the levy on Undeveloped Property and I A No. lUndeveloped Property being Proportionate; Fourth: If additional monies aze needed to satisfy the Special Tax Requirement after the first steps have been completed, the Special Tax shall be levied on each Asscssor's Parcel of Final Mapped Property and Undeveloped Property at up to 100% of the Maximum Special Tax for Final Mapped Property and Undeveloped Property; and the City Council shall be notified by the CFD Administrator that under the terms of the I A No. 1 RMA, the I A No. 1 Special Tax shall be levied on each Assessor's Pazcel of I A No. 1 Final Mapped Property and I A No. 1 Undeveloped Property at up to 100% of the I A No. 1 Maximum Special Tax for I A No. 1 Final Mapped Property and I A No. 1 Undeveloped Property, with the levy on Final Mapped Property and Undeveloped Property and I A No. 1 Final Mapped Property and I A No. 1 Undeveloped Property being Proportionate; Fifth: If additional monies aze needed to satisfy the Special Tax Requirement after the first four steps have been completed, then the levy of the Special Tax on each Assessor's Parcel of Developed Property whose Maximum Special Tax is determined through the application of the Backup Special Tax shall be increased in equal percentages from the Assigned Special Tax up to the Maximum Special Tax for each such Assessor's Parcel; and the City Council shall be notified by the CFD Administrator that under the terms of the I A No. 1 RMA, the levy of the I A No. 1 Special Tax on each Assessor's Pazcel of I A No. 1 Developed Property whose I A No. 1 Maximum Special Tax is determined through the application of the I A No. 1 Backup Special Tax shall be increased in equal percentages from the I A No. 12 Assigned Special Tax up to the I A No. 1 Maximum Special Tax for each such Assessor's Parcel, with the levy on Developed Property and I A No. 1 Developed Property being Proportionate; Sixth: If additional monies are needed to satisfy the Special Tax Requirement after the first five steps have been completed, then the levy of the Special Tax on each Assessor's Parcel of Taxable Property Owner Association Property or Taxable Public Property at up to the Maximum Special Tax for Taxable Property Owner Association Property or Taxable Public Property; and the City Council shall be notified by the CFD Administrator that under the terms of the I A No. 1 RMA, the I A No. 1 Special Tax shall be levied on each Assessor's Pazcel of I A No. 1 Taxable Property Owner Association Property or I A No. 1 Taxable Public Property at up to the I A No.l Maximum Special Tax for I A No. 1 Taxable Property Owner Association Property or I A No. 1 Taxable Public Property, with the levy on Taxable Property Owner Association Property or Taxable Public Property and I A No. 1 Taxable Property Owner Association Property or I A No. 1 Taxable Public Property being Proportionate. Notwithstanding the above the City Council may, in any Fiscal Year, levy proportionately less than 100% of the Assigned Special Tax and the I A No. 1 Assigned Special Tax in step one (above) when (i) the City Council is no longer required to levy a Special Tax pursuant to steps two through six above and the City Council is no longer required to levy an I A No. 1 Special Tax pursuant to steps two through six (above) of the I A No. 1 RMA in order to meet the Special Tax Requirement; (ii) all authorized Bonds have already been issued or the City Council has covenanted that it will not issue any additional Bonds (except refunding bonds) to be supported P626 by Special Taxes and I A No. 1 Special Taxes; and (iii) all Authorized Facilities have been constructed and/or acquired. Further notwithstanding the above, under no circumstances will the Special Tax levied against any Assessor's Parcel or Residential Property for which an occupancy permit for private residential use has been issued be increased by more than ten percent as a consequence of delinquency or default by the owner of any other Assessor's Parcel within I A No. 1 or I A No. 2, except for those Residential Properties whose owners are also delinquent or in default on their Special Tax payments for one or more other properties within I A No. 1 or I A No. 2. P627 ~ Q d O ~ a ~ ,~ O ~ ~ r N W ~ N N w ~ ~ N J ~ ~ E ® `~ A; > ~ Q O ; ; ~ o o ~ O o0i ~ U O E E O ~ ~ r x O ._ ._.._.. ~_ ~ O ~ J y ~ ~ ~'0 U N ~ y ; d o r' J Q) ~ yr ! ~ ~ w m r ° 3 a ~ j V li Q _.._.. ~ ! i nb' ise3 in ! ® Y L V - •1~r ~ ny epuenn!33 ny epuenn!33 .C ~ .7 ~ aaJ e ~8 ~I ~ ~ _. .._.._ .._ ~ ~ ny Jalsayooa ny Jalsay~oa .._ V r i ny ua~!II!W ~ .._.._.._.._ i ny ua~!II!W i i ny uaneH • ny uaneH i i ny esowJaH i ny esowJaH i n`d PIe4!yoJH ; nb' Pleq!4oJt/ ! ny uewllaH ny uewllaH i iE ~ vJ • L f i r L v ny p e~(au!n ~ ue awe~ i pp PE•Y!~c.~=i~ t ° !l ~ S Y.i a Y yet 1 ~~~'.^~ • E~~a~s. ~~3a ~ t~. SL~F~ ~Y' 32 2 Y.._.._.. _..J'~' _ ny anOJ~ & 2 6Ye'e 3'4F~ ~ j ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ f6 m O LL Q $s ! i ~S~Yi€ F$I ~ d >. ~ ra 6@~ dI~ Y! ~ w m _ m ~ z$3~gB9~fA 7 et @@.ra YY B~C E~~ ~ o ~ ~' jj a ~2~8 ~ !~$a~•~ U F (Y ~LEs&Y~ s~Fc P628 T H E C I T Y O F R A N C II O C U C A M O N G A SlQ,ll 1\~~ DATE: June 3, 2009 TO: Mayor and Members of City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: John R. Gillison, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Servic~5= BY: Ingrid Y. Bruce, GIS/Special Districts Manager SUBTECT: APPROVAL TO SET ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT N0.2001-O1(IMPROVEMENT AREA N0.3 ZONE'7), SERIES 2001-B WITH NO INCREASE TO THE CURRENT RATE. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached Resolution setting the annual special tax for the new Community Facilities District No. 2001-O1 (Improvement Area No.3 Zone 7), Series 2001-B. Pursuant to Section 53340 and 53358 of the Government Code Mello-Roos Community Facilities District Act of 1982, the City Council is authorized to annually levy the tax rate to pay debt service on the bonds. There is no increase to the current rate for fiscal yeaz 2009/2010. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS On June 20, 2001, an election was held and the property owners within the boundary of Community Facilities District No. 2001-01 (Improvement Area No.3 Zone 7), Series 2001-B authorized the district to incur bonded indebtedness in the principal amount of $935,000. On August 15, 2001 the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 01-019 authorizing the issuance of bonds. Bonds were issued on August 29, 2001 to share in the financing of public street improvements required for the development of the property within the District, including improvements to Day Creek Boulevard, Victoria Pazk Lane, Church Street, Foothill Boulevazd, Baseline Road and Arbor Way, landscaping improvements within public right-of- way, storm drain and flood control improvements. P629 Page 2 June 3, 2009 City Council Staff Report CFD 2001-01 (Improvement Area 3) The property owners within the district approved the maximum rate for the special tax at $1,963.45 per acre. This special tax shall be levied only so long as required for each parcel of taxable property to dischazge bond obligations through the life of the bonds. Attachments: Resolution Exhibit "A" Map RESOLUTION NO. Qq- f I (O A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RE-ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 2001-01 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2009- 2010 (IMPROVEMENT AREA N0.3 ZONE 7), SERIES 2001-B Recitals WHEREAS, by its Resolution No. 01-162, adopted on June 20, 2001, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California (the "City Council"), pursuant to the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982 (Section 53311 and following of the California Government Code) (the "Act") established City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Facilities District No. 2001-O1 (the "District") and established within the District an improvement area designated Improvement Area No. 3 (the "Improvement Area"); and WHEREAS, at an election held on June 20, 2001, the qualified electors of the Improvement Area unanimously approved the levy of a special tax against properties in the Improvement Area (the "Special Tax"); and WHEREAS, by its Ordinance No. 658 (the "Ordinance"), adopted on July 18, 2001, the City Council authorized the levy of the Special Tax in accordance with the Act; and WHEREAS, on September 18, 2001, the District delivered its $935,000 City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Facilities District No. 2001-O1 Improvement Area No. 3 Zone 7 Special Tax Bonds Series 2001-B (the "Bonds"); and WHEREAS, in a Fiscal Agent Agreement dated as of August 1, 2001, by and between the City and Wells Fargo Baz~k, National Association (the "Fiscal Agent"), the City covenanted to fix and levy the Special Tax within the Improvement Area for each fiscal yeaz in an amount required for the payment of principal and interest on the Bonds becoming due and payable during that fiscal yeaz, plus administrative expenses, but taking into account certain balances in funds held by the Fiscal Agent (the "Covenant"); and WHEREAS, debt service will become due and payable on the Bonds during Fiscal Yeaz 2007-2008 in an amount exceeding funds held by the Fiscal Agent and designated for the payment for such debt service; and WHEREAS, the City Council intends to levy the Special Tax for Fiscal Yeaz 2009-2010 as authorized by the Ordinance and required by the Covenant; and WHEREAS, the City Council intends to provide for the collection of such Special Tax for Fiscal Year 2009-2010 by City staff. NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: P630 SECTION I: That the above recitals aze all true and correct. P631 SECTION 2: That the specific rate and amount of the Special Tax to be collected to pay for the costs and expenses for Fiscal Yeaz 2009-2010 for the District is hereby determined and established as set forth Exhibit "A" to this Resolution, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference SECTION 3: That the rate as set forth above does not exceed the amount as previously authorized by Ordinance of this legislative body, and is not in excess of that as previously approved by the qualified electors of the District. SECTION 4: That the proceeds of the Special Tax shall be used to pay, in whole or in part, the costs of the following, in the following order of priority: A. Payment of principal and interest on any outstanding authorized bonded indebtedness; B. Necessary replenishment of bond reserve funds or other reserve funds; C. Payment of costs and expenses of authorized public facilities and public services, and incidental expenses pursuant to the Act; and D. Repayment of advances and loans, if appropriate. The proceeds of the special taxes shall be used as set forth above, and shall not be used for any other purpose. SECTION 5: The special tax shall be collected in the same manner as ordinary ad valorem property taxes are collected, and shall be subject to the same penalties and same procedure and sale in cases of any delinquency for ad valorem taxes, and the Tax Collector is hereby authorized to deduct reasonable administrative costs incurred in collecting any said special tax. SECTION 6: All monies collected pursuant to this Resolution shall be paid into the Community Facilities District funds, including any bond fund and reserve fund. SECTION 7: The Auditor of the County is hereby directed to enter in the next county assessment roll on which taxes will become due, opposite each lot or pazcel of land effected in a space mazked "public improvements, special tax", or by any other suitable designation, the installment of the special tax, and for the exact rate and amount of said tax, reference is made to the attached Exhibit "A". SECTION 8: The County Auditor shall then, at the close of the tax collection period, promptly render to this Agency a detailed report showing the amount and/or amounts of such special tax installments, interest, penalties and percentages so collected and from what property collected, and also provide a statement of any percentages retained for the expense of making any such collection. P632 PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of June 2009. Donald J. Kurth, M.D., Mayor ATTEST: Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk I, JANICE C. REYNOLDS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a regulaz meeting of said City Council held on the day of June 2009. Executed this day of June 2009, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk P633 Resolution No. Page CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT N0.2001-O1 (IMPROVEMENT AREA No. 3 ZONE 'n SERIES 2001-B EXHIBIT "A" The Resolution establishing the annual special tax refers to this Exhibit for an explanation of the rate and method of apportionment of the Special Taxes for Fiscal Year 2009/2010. CLASSIFICATION OF PARCELS Each Fiscal Yeaz, all Taxable Property within each Zone of hnprovement Area No. 3 shall be classified as Taxable or Non-Taxable Property and all such Taxable Property shall be subject to the levy of Special Taxes in accordance with the rate and method of apportionment determined pursuant to the sections below. MAXIMUM SPECIAL TAX RATE A. The Maximum Special Tax and Taxable Acreage for Taxable Property and Taxable Public Property for each Zone is shown in Table 1. TABLE 1 Zone Taxable Acrea a Bond Share Maximum Tax Per Acre Zone 1 -Future RDA 55.00 91.70% $15,230.37 Zone 7 - Leggio South 42.74 8.30% $ 1,963.45 B. Assignment of Maximum Annual Special Tax to Successor Pazcels. The Community Facilities District (CFD) Administrator shall assign the Maximum Annual Special Tax to each Successor Parcel as follows: P634 1) When an Original or Successor Pazcel is subdivided, the CFD Administrator shall classify the resulting Successor Pazcels as Taxable Pazcels or Tax-Exempt parcels using the definitions in the rate and method of apportionment of special tax. 2) If the Successor Pazcel is a Taxable Pazcel: Calculate the percentage of the taxable Successor Pazcels' squaze footage to the total squaze footage for all taxable Successor Pazcels of that Original or Successor Pazcel; then, Multiply this percentage by the Maximum Annual Special Tax assigned to the previous Original Pazcel or Successor Pazcel. The result of this calculation is the Maximum Annual Special Tax for the Taxable Successor Parcel. C. Taxable Pazcels Acquired by a Public Agency Taxable Parcels that are acquired by a public agency after the CFD is formed will remain subject to the applicable Special Tax unless the Special Tax obligation is satisfied pursuant to Section 53317.5 o the Government Code. An exception to this maybe made if the Public use planned for a Public Pazcel within the CFD is relocated to a Taxable Pazcel and the previously Tax-Exempt Pazcel of compazable acreage becomes a Taxable Pazcel. This trading of Pazcels will be permitted to the extent that there is no net loss in Maximum Special Tax. It is anticipated that the City will acquire approximately 55 Acres that will be subject to the Special Tax. APPORTIONMENT OF SPECIAL TAX For each Fiscal Yeaz the Council shall determine the Special Tax Requirement and levy the Special Tax, taking into consideration the levy of the Improvement Area No. 3 Special Tax, until the amount of Special Taxes and Improvement Area No. 3 Special Taxes equal the Special Tax Requirement. The Special Tax shall be levied each Fiscal Yeaz as follows: First: The Special Tax shall be levied on each Assessor's Parcel of Taxable Property in an amount equal to 100% of the applicable Maximum Special Tax; or Second: If less monies are needed to satisfy the Special Tax Requirement after the first step has been completed, the Special Tax shall be levied proportionately on each Taxable Pazcel at less than 100% of the Maximum Special Tax; provided that the Council may levy an amount in excess of the Special Tax Requirement if all authorized Bonds have not already been issued. P635 Further notwithstanding the above, under no circumstances will the Special Tax levied against any Assessor's Parcel of Residential Property for which an occupancy permit for private residential use has been issued be increased by more than ten percent as a consequence of delinquency or default by the owner of any other Assessor's Parcel within Improvement Area No. 3, except for those Residential Properties whose owners are also delinquent or in default on their Special Tax payments for one or more other properties within Improvement Area No.3. eec ~ ~ O O O O N N Yr '~ 'i `~ .y y Ay ,= V ~` ~F .~ 0 V ny ua~lll!W ny uaneH ny esow~aH nH PIeQ!4o~b' ny uewllaH I ;g uellawe~ _oi ~~ U 3Rt !' F eLg ~:t c 0 N ny epuennl;3 ~aa~~.nea .._.._ ny ~a;sayooa _. ___ In d' C m c N m 2 o: m C J a ,• ~ ~ ~ c L J ~ N r y N m ~ ~~~ N N r ~ ~ m u N N ~ M N m W m r a _ ._ ~ m E ® J ~ ~ ~ ~ a o E E ~ U _ °'rn ••x o O J y .~ U ~ ~ 0 m ~ 8 a 4 ~/\~ x _..~.._ i nH ise3 in i ny epuennR3 ny ~a;sayooa ny ua~!II!W ny uaneH ny esow~aH nb' PIe4!4o~H ~ ~ ny uewliaH ~ ~~ L L V ny p~e~(au!n _ .__ ._.. ^~---~--r ny anal m ~ in L O oD O Q LL T H E C I T Y O F RANCHO C H C A M O N G A StaffRepart DATE: June 3, 2009 TO: Mayor and Members of City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: John R. Gillison, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Sern BY: Ingrid Y. Bruce, GIS/Special Districts Manager SUBJF.CI': APPROVAL TO SET ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT N0.2003-O1 (IMPROVEMENT AREA NO. 1 ZONES 1, 2 & 3, SERIES 2003-A) WITH NO INCREASE TO THE CURRENT RATE. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached Resolution setting the annual special tax for the new Community Facilities District No. 2003-01 (Improvement Area No. I Zones 1, 2 & 3), Series 2003-A. Pursuant to Section 53340 and 53358 of the Government Code Mello-Roos Community Facilities District Act of 1982, the City Council is authorized to annually levy the tax rate to pay debt service on the bonds. There is no increase to the current rate for fiscal year 2009/2010. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS On February 19, 2003, an election was held and the property owners within the boundary of Community Facilities District No. 2003-01 (Improvement Area No. 1), Series 2003-A authorized the district to incur bonded indebtedness in the principal amount of $14,645,000. On March 5, 2003, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 699 approving the levy of the special tax, and on May 21, 2003 approved Resolution No. 03-125 authorizing the issuance of bonds. The District consists of approximately 229 gross acres, of which 147 acres are designated as Improvement Area No. 1 (Zones 1, 2 & 3). The District boundary is located in the eastern part of the City generally west of Interstate 15, south of Church Street, north of Arrow Route and east of the Southern California Edison easement corridor from Arrow Route north, to P637 P638 Page 2 June 3, 2009 City Council Staff Report CFD 2003-O1 (Improvement Area No. 1, Zones 1, 2 & 3) Foothill Boulevard and Day Creek Boulevazd from Foothill Boulevard north, to Church Street. The District is located within the Victoria Community Plan of the City. Bonds were issued on August 20, 2003 to share in the provision of funds for the acquisition and construction of certain public street improvements, storm drain and flood control and water and sewer improvements to serve property located within the District and a cultural center owned by the City, including a performing arts center, public library and banquet halUmeeting room. This special tax shall be levied only so long as required for each parcel of taxable property to dischazge bond obligations through the life of the bonds. Attachments: Resolution Exhibit "A" Map RESOLUTION NO. ©/- ~~ 7 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RE-ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX RATE FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 2003-Oi FOR FISCAL YEAR 2009-2010 (IMPROVEMENT AREA NO. 1 ZONES 1, 2 & 3), SERIES 2003-A Recitals WHEREAS, by its Resolution No. 03-031, adopted on February 19, 2003, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California (the "City Council"), pursuant to the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982 (Section 53311 and following of the California Government Code) (the "Act") established City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Facilities District No. 2003-O1 (the "District") and established within the District improvement azeas designated Improvement Area No. 1, Zones 1, 2 & 3 (the "Improvement Area"); and WHEREAS, at an election held on February 19, 2003, the qualified electors of the Improvement Area No. 1, Zones 1, 2 & 3 unanimously approved the levy of a special tax against properties in the Improvement Area (the "Special Tax"); and WHEREAS, by its Ordinance No. 699 (the "Ordinance"), adopted on Mazch 3, 2003 the City Council authorized the levy of the Special Tax in accordance with the Act; and WHEREAS, on August 20, 2003, the District delivered its $14,645,000 City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Facilities District No. 2003-01 Improvement Area No. 1, Zones 1, 2 & 3 Special Tax Bonds Series 2003-A (the "Bonds"); and WHEREAS, in a Fiscal Agent Agreement dated as of July 1, 2003 by and between the City and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (the "Fiscal Agent"), the City covenanted to fix and levy the Special Tax within the Improvement Area No. 1, Zones 1, 2 & 3 for each fiscal year in an amount required for the payment of principal and interest on the Bonds becoming due and payable during that fiscal yeaz, plus administrative expenses, but taking into account certain balances in funds held by the Fiscal Agent (the "Covenant"); and WHEREAS, interest will become due and payable on the Bonds during Fiscal Yeaz 2009- 2010 in an amount exceeding funds held by the Fiscal Agent and designated for the payment for such interest; and WHEREAS, the City Council intends to levy the Special Tax for Fiscal Yeaz 2009-2010 as authorized by the Ordinance and required by the Covenant; and WHEREAS, the City Council intends to provide for the collection of such Special Tax for Fiscal Year 2009-2010 by City staff. NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: P639 SECTION 1: That the above recitals aze all true and correct. P640 SECTION 2: That the specific rate and amount of the Special Tax to be collected to pay for the costs and expenses for Fiscal Yeaz 2009-2010 for the District is hereby determined and established as set forth Exhibit "A" to this Resolution, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference SECTION 3: That the rate as set forth above does not exceed the amount as previously authorized by Ordinance of this legislative body, and is not in excess of that as previously approved by the qualified electors of the District. SECTION 4: That the proceeds of the Special Tax shall be used to pay, in whole or in part, the costs of the following, in the following order of priority: A. Payment of principal and interest on any outstanding authorized bonded indebtedness; B. Necessary replenishment of bond reserve funds or other reserve funds; C. Payment of costs and expenses of authorized public facilities and public services, and incidental expenses pursuant to the Act; and D. Repayment of advances and loans, if appropriate. The proceeds of the special taxes shall be used as set forth above, and shall not be used for any other purpose. SECTION 5: The special tax shall be collected in the same manner as ordinary ad valorem property taxes are collected, and shall be subject to the same penalties and same procedure and sale in cases of any delinquency for ad valorem taxes, and the Tax Collector is hereby authorized to deduct reasonable administrative costs incurred in collecting any said special tax. SECTION 6: All monies collected pursuant to this Resolution shall be paid into the Community Facilities District funds, including any bond fund and reserve fund. SECTION 7: The Auditor of the County is hereby directed to enter in the next county assessment roll on which taxes will become due, opposite each lot or pazcel of land effected in a space mazked "public improvements, special tax", or by any other suitable designation, the installment of the special tax, and for the exact rate and amount of said tax, reference is made to the attached Exhibit "A". SECTION 8: The County Auditor shall then, at the close of the tax collection period, promptly render to this Agency a detailed report showing the amount and/or amounts of such special tax installments, interest, penalties and percentages so collected and from what property collected, and also provide a statement of any percentages retained for the expense of making any such collection. P641 PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of June 2009. Donald J. Kurth, M.D., Mayor ATTEST: Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk I, JANICE C. REYNOLDS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a regulaz meeting of said City Council held on the day of June 2009. Executed this day of June 2009, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk P642 Resolution No. Page CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT N0.2003-O1 (IMPROVEMENT AREA NO. 1, ZONES 1, 2 & 3) SERIES 2003-A EXHIBIT "A" The Resolution establishing the annual special tax refers to this Exhibit for an explanation of the rate and method of apportionment of the Special Taxes for Fiscal Yeaz 2009/2010. CLASSIFICATION OF PARCELS Improvement Area No. 1 Each Fiscal Yeaz, all Taxable Property within Zone 1, Zone 2, and Zone 3 of CFD No. 2003-01 (IA No. 1) shall be classified as Developed Property or Undeveloped Property, and shall be subject to the levy of Special Taxes in accordance with the rate and method of apportionment determined pursuant to the sections below. MAXIMUM SPECIAL TAX RATE 1. ZONE 1 a. Zone 1 Developed Property (i). Maximum Special Tax The Maximum Special Tax for each Assessor's Pazcel in Zone 1 classified as Developed Property shall be the greater of (i) the amount derived by application of the Assigned Special Tax for Zone 1 or (ii) the amount derived by application of the Backup Special Tax for Zone 1. (ii). Assigned Special Tax The Assigned Special Tax for each Assessor's Pazcel of Developed Property in Zone 1 of CFD No. 2003-O1 (IA No. 1) shall equal $4,318 per Acre for Fiscal Year 2003-04, and shall increase thereafter, commencing on July 1, P643 2004 and on July 1 of each Fiscal Yeaz thereafter, by an amount equal to two percent (2%) of the Assigned Special Tax for the previous Fiscal Yeaz. (iii). Backup Special Tax The Backup Special Tax for each Assessor's Parcel of Developed Property in Zone 1 of CFD No. 2003-01 (IA No. 1) shall equal $4,798 per Acre for Fiscal Yeaz 2003-04, and shall increase thereafter, commencing on July 1, 2004 and on July 1 of each Fiscal Yeaz thereafter, by an amount equal to two percent (2%) of the Backup Special Tax for the previous Fiscal Year. b. Zone 1 Undeveloped Property The Maximum Special Tax for Undeveloped Property in Zone 1 of CFD No. 2003-01 (IA No. 1) shall be $4,798 per Acre for Fiscal Yeaz 2003-04, and shall increase thereafter, commencing on July 1, 2004 and on July 1 of each Fiscal Ycar thereafter, by an amount equal to two percent (2%) of the Maximum Special Tax for the previous Fiscal Yeaz. ZONE 2 a. Zone 2 Developed Property (i). Maximum Special Tax The Maximum Special Tax for each Assessor's Parcel in Zone 2 classified as Developed Property shall be the greater of (i) the amount derived by application of the Assigned Special Tax for Zone 2 or (ii) the amount derived by application of the Backup Special Tax for Zone 2. (ii). Assigned Special Tax The Assigned Special Tax for each Assessor's Parcel of Developed Property in Zone 2 of CFD No. 2003-O1 (IA No. 1) shall equal $36,294 per Acre for Fiscal Year 2003-04, and shall increase thereafter, commencing on July 1, 2004 and on July 1 of each Fiscal Year thereafter, by an amount equal to two percent (2%) of the Assigned Special Tax for the previous Fiscal Year. P644 (iii). Backun Snecial Tax The Backup Special Tax for each Assessor's Pazcel of Developed Property in Zone 2 of CFD No. 2003-01 (IA No. 1) shall equal $40,327 per Acre for Fiscal Yeaz 2003-04, and shall increase thereafter, commencing on July 1, 2004 and on July 1 of each Fiscal Yeaz thereafter, by an amount equal to two percent (2%) of the Backup Special Tax for the previous Fiscal Yeaz. Zone 2 Undeveloped Property The Maximum Special Tax for Undeveloped Property in Zone 2 of CFD No. 2003-O1 (IA No. 1) shall be $12,817 per Acre for Fiscal Year 2003-04, and shall increase thereafter, commencing on July 1, 2004 and on July 1 of each Fiscal Year thereafter, by an amount equal to two percent (2%) of the Maximum Special Tax for the previous Fiscal Yeaz. 3. ZONE 3 a. Zone 3 Developed Property (i). Maximum Snecial Tax The Maximum Special Tax for each Assessor's Parcel in Zone 3 classified as Developed Property shall be the greater of (i) the amount derived by application of the Assigned Special Tax for Zone 3 or (ii) the amount derived by application of the Backup Special Tax for Zone 3. (ii). Assigned Snecial Tax The Assigned Special Tax for each Assessor's Pazcel of Developed Property in Zone 3 of CFD No. 2003-O1 (IA No. 1) shall equal $10,272 per Acre for Fiscal Year 2003-04, and shall increase thereafter, commencing on July 1, 2004 and on July 1 of each Fiscal Yeaz thereafter, by an amount equal to two percent (2%) of the Assigned Special Tax for the previous Fiscal Year. (iii). Backun Special Tax The Backup Specia] Tax for each Assessor's Pazcel of Developed Property in Zone 3 of CFD No. 2003-01 (LA No. 1) shall equal $11,413 per Acre for Fiscal Yeaz 2003-04, and shall increase thereafter, commencing on July 1, P645 2004 and on July 1 of each Fiscal Yeaz thereafter, by an amount equal to two percent (2%) of the Backup Special Tax for the previous Fiscal Yeaz. b. Zone 3 Undeveloped Property The Maximum Special Tax for Undeveloped Property in Zone 3 of CFD No. 2003-O1 (IA No. 1) shall be $11,413 per Acre for Fiscal Year 2003-04, and shall increase thereafter, commencing on July 1, 2004 and on July 1 of each Fiscal Year thereafter, by an amount equal to two percent (2%) of the Maximum Special Tax for the previous Fiscal Yeaz. D. METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT OF THE SPECIAL TAX 1. ZONE 1 Commencing with Fiscal Yeaz 2003-04 and for each following Fiscal Year, the Council shall determine the Zone 1 Special Tax Requirement and levy the Special Tax in Zone 1 until the amount of Special Taxes levied in Zone 1 is equal to the Zone 1 Special Tax Requirement. The Special Tax shall be levied in Zone 1 each Fiscal Yeaz as follows: First: The Special Tax shall be levied on each Assessor's Pazcel of Developed Property in Zone 1 in an amount equal to 100% of the Assigned Special Tax for Developed Property; Second: If additional monies aze needed to satisfy the Zone 1 Special Tax Requirement after the first step has been completed, the Special Tax shall be levied Proportionately on each Assessor's Pazcel of Undeveloped Property in Zone 1 at up to 100% of the Maximum Special Tax for Undeveloped Property; Third: ff additional monies are needed to satisfy the Zone 1 Special Tax Requirement after the first two steps have been completed, then the levy of the Special Tax on each Assessor's Parcel of Developed Property in Zone 1 whose Maximum Special Tax is equal to the Backup Special Tax shall be increased Proportionately from the Assigned Special Tax up to the Maximum Special Tax for each such Assessor's Parcel. Notwithstanding the above, the Council may in any Fiscal Yeaz levy Proportionately less than 100% of the Assigned Special Tax in step one (above) when the Council no longer must levy a Special Tax in Zone 1 pursuant to steps two and three above, and (i) all authorized CFD No. 2003-O1 (IA No. 1) Bonds have already been issued, or (ii) the Council has covenanted that it will not issue any additional CFD No. 2003-01 (IA No. 1) Bonds (except refunding bonds) to be supported by Special Taxes levied under this Rate and Method of Apportionment. P646 Further notwithstanding the above, under no circumstances will the Special Tax levied against any Assessor's Parcel of Residential Property for which an occupancy permit for private residential use has been issued be increased by more than ten percent as a consequence of delinquency or default by the owncr of any other Assessor's Pazcel within Zone 1, except for those Residential Properties whose owners aze also delinquent or in default on their Special Tax payments for one or more other properties within Zone 1. 2. ZONE 2 Commencing with Fiscal Yeaz 2003-04 and for each following Fiscal Yeaz, the Council shall determine the Zone 2 Special Tax Requirement and levy the Special Tax in Zone 2 until the amount of Special Taxes levied in Zone 2 is equal to the Zone 2 Special Tax Requirement. The Special Tax shall be levied in Zone 2 each Fiscal Year as follows: First: The Special Tax shall be levied on each Assessor's Parcel of Developed Property in Zone 2 in an amount equal to 100% of the Assigned Special Tax for Developed Property; Second: If additional monies are needed to satisfy the Zone 2 Special Tax Requirement after the first step has been completed, the Special Tax shall be levied Proportionately on each Assessor's Pazcel of Undeveloped Property in Zone 2 at up to 100% of the Maximum Special Tax for Undeveloped Property; Proportionately from the Assigned Special Tax up to the Maximum Special Tax for each such Assessor's Parcel. Notwithstanding the above, the Council may in any Fiscal Yeaz levy Proportionately less than 100% of the Assigned Special Tax in step one (above) when the Council no longer must levy a Special Tax in Zone 2 pursuant to steps two and three above, and (i) all authorized CFD No. 2003-01 (IA No. 1) Bonds have already been issued, or (ii) the Council has covenanted that it will not issue any additional CFD No. 2003-O1 (IA No. 1) Bonds (except refunding bonds) to be supported by Special Taxes levied under this Rate and Method of Apportionment. 3. ZONE 3 Commencing with Fiscal Yeaz 2003-04 and for each following Fiscal Year, the Council shall determine the Zone 3 Special Tax Requirement and levy the Special Tax in Zone 3 until the amount of Special Taxes levied in Zone 3 is equal to the Zone 3 Special Tax Requirement. The Special Tax shall be levied in Zone 3 each Fiscal Yeaz as follows: P647 First: The Special Tax shall be levied on each Assessor's Parcel of Developed Property in Zone 3 in an amount equal to 100% of the Assigned Special Tax for Developed Property; econd: If additional monies are needed to satisfy the Zone 3 Special Tax Requirement after the first step has been completed, the Special Tax shall be levied Proportionately on each Assessor's Parcel of Undeveloped Property in Zone 3 at up to 100% of the Maximum Special Tax for Undeveloped Property; Third: If additional monies aze needed to satisfy the Zone 3 Special Tax Requirement after the first two steps have been completed, then the lery of the Special Tax on each Assessor's Parcel of Developed Property in Zone 3 whose Maximum Special Tax is equal to the Backup Special Tax shall be increased Proportionately from the Assigned Special Tax up to the Maximum Special Tax for each such Assessor's Parcel. Notwithstanding the above, the Council may in any Fiscal Year levy Proportionately less than 100% of the Assigned Special Tax in step one (above) when the Council no longer must levy a Special Tax in Zone 3 pursuant to steps two and three above, and (i) all authorized CFD No. 2003-O1 (IA No. 1) Bonds have already been issued, or (ii) the Council has covenanted that it will not issue any additional CFD No. 2003-01 (IA No. 1) Bonds (except refunding bonds) to be supported by Special Taxes levied under this Rate and Method of Apportionment. 1. ZONE 1 No Special Tax shall be levied on Public Property in Zone 1. 2. ZONE 2 No Special Tax shall be levied on Public Property in Zone 2. In addition, no Special Tax shall be levied on Privately Owned Exempt Parking Property in Zone 2. Furthermore, no Special Tax shall be levied on up to 10.56 Acres of Privately Owned Specific Retail Property in Zone 2. Tax-exempt status will be assigned by the CFD Administrator in the chronological order in which property in Zone 2 becomes Privately Owned Specific Retail Property. If the total number of Acres of Privately Owned Specific Retail Property exceeds the amount stated above, then the Acres exceeding such total shall be taxed at the applicable rates for Developed Property for Zone 2 as set forth in Section C above and to the extent set forth in Section D above. 3. ZONE 3 No Special Tax shall be levied on Public Property in Zone 3. P648 ~ Q d O r N t7 C ~ (/) Q G "' O ~ (/~ N N N •~ w O'w ~ ~ ~ v! ~ N v v a~i wI, ~.. E E E ~ .v Q T ~i o 0 0 ~ ,w, N ~ U OO ()`E~~ E E y ; ~ o C ,~ r' J CO ~ y~1 ! W L 3 ~ fl] O O ~ ~ LL Q V _.._.. ~ ! i ny ~se3 in i ® ~ r v ny epuenn!;3 ny epuenng3 .C ~ ~ i aa~ e ~9 ~._. ~.._4 .._.._ 0 ny ~a;sayooa~ ny is;sayooa V ~~- I ,_.._.._.._.._. nH ua~l!II!W ny ua~gpW! i i i ny uaneH ; ny uaneH ! i ny esow~aH ~ ny esow~aH i ny p!eq!yo~y ; nd Pleq!4o~b' 1 ! ~~ ~ ny uewllaH ny uewllaH i ~ L f. t ny p e~(au!/~ ! '`f3=`5' '~' £€.4 ~Ei3 6~~ aS ue!lawe~~ pia€t Fe~,~~ .., ~ a ~ ~~~ i 8 v - g3g$ °eb~! ~ t, s E ~.._.._ . ~ ._..1° ny anal ;ez~s ~~~ ~~ i ,,• in ~ m ~ in ~~i ( ,_.._.. _.._...•«, a~ {.._.._ W O ~£.a ~ ~ 'o ~ ~ o a s!°'~3~ _~ a c 8g~~i~l3f~l~' w m e~~i# p yyy O~ _ m P 3€i e3'p~~~ i 2 8qC~§yyEy2s 2 ~ ~~ Ea`~a E'~ ~ ! U 8a~:€EBsla~e T H E C I T Y O F R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A StaffRepo~rt DATE: June 3, 2009 TO: Mayor and Members of City Council Jack Lam, A1CP, City Manager FROM: John R. Gillison, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Service BY: Ingrid Y. Bruce, GIS/Special Districts Manager SUBJECT: APPROVAL TO SET ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT N0.2003-O1 (IMPROVEMENT AREA N0.2 ZONES 1 & 2, SERIES 2003-B) WITH NO INCREASE TO THE CURRENT RATE. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached Resolution setting the annual special tax for Community Facilities District No. 2003-01 (Improvement Area No. 2 Zones 1 & 2), Series 2003-A. Pursuant to Section 53340 and 53358 of the Government Code Mello- Roos Community Facilities District Act of 1982, the City Council is authorized to annually levy the tax rate to pay debt service on the bonds. There is no increase to the current rate for fiscal yeaz 2009/2010. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS On February 19, 2003, an election was held and the property owners within the boundary of Community Facilities District No. 2003-01 (Improvement Area No. 2), Series 2003-B authorized the district to incur bonded indebtedness in the principal amount of $2,855,000. On March 5, 2003, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 699 approving the levy of the special tax, and on May 21, 2003 approved Resolution No. 03-125 authorizing the issuance of bonds. The District consists of approximately 229 gross acres, of which 82 acres aze designated as Improvement Area No. 2 (Zones 1 & 2). The District boundazy is located in the eastern part of the City generally west of Interstate 15, south of Church Street, north of Arrow Route and east of Southern California Edison easement corridor from Arrow Route north, to Foothill P649 P650 Page 2 June 3, 2009 City Council Staff Report CFD 2003-O1 (Improvement Area No. 2, Zones 1 & 2) Boulevard and Day Creek Boulevard from Foothill Boulevazd north, to Church Street. The District is located within the Victoria Community Plan of the City. Bonds were issued on August 20, 2003 to share in the provision of funds for the acquisition and construction of certain public street improvements, storm drain and flood control and water and sewer improvements to serve property located within the District and a cultural center owned by the City, including a performing arts center, public library and banquet hall/meeting room. This special tax shall be levied only so long as required for each pazcel of taxable property to discharge bond obligations through the life of the bonds. Attachments: Resolution Exhibit "A" Map //yy P651 RESOLUTION NO. D'7-l~~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RE-ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 2003-O1 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2009- 2010 (IMPROVEMENT AREA NO. 2 ZONES 1 & 2), SERIES 2003-B Recitals WHEREAS, by its Resolution No. 03-031, adopted on Februazy 19, 2003, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California (the "City Council"), pursuant to the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982 (Section 53311 and following of the California Government Code) (the "Act") established City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Facilities District No. 2003-O1 (the "District") and established within the District improvement azeas designated Improvement Area No. 2, Zones 1 & 2 (the "Improvement Area"); and WHEREAS, at an election held on February 19, 2003, the qualified electors of the Improvement Area No. 2, Zones 1 & 2 unanimously approved the levy of a special tax against properties in the Improvement Area (the "Special Tax"); and WHEREAS, by its Ordinance No. 699 (the "Ordinance"), adopted on Mazch 3, 2003 the City Council authorized the levy of the Special Tax in accordance with the Act; and WHEREAS, on August 20, 2003, the District delivered its $2,855,000 City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Facilities District No. 2003-O1 Improvement Area No. 2, Zones 1 & 2 Special Tax Bonds Series 2003-B (the "Bonds"); and WHEREAS, in a Fiscal Agent Agreement dated as of July 1, 2003 by and between the City and Wells Fazgo Bank, National Association (the "Fiscal Agent"), the City covenanted to fix and levy the Special Tax within the Improvement Area No. 2, Zones 1 & 2 for each fiscal yeaz in an amount required for the payment of principal and interest on the Bonds becoming due and payable during that fiscal year, plus administrative expenses, but taking into account certain balances in funds held by the Fiscal Agent (the "Covenant"); and WHEREAS, interest will become due and payable on the Bonds during Fiscal Yeaz 2009- 2010 in an amount exceeding funds held by the Fiscal Agent and designated for the payment for such interest; and WHEREAS, the City Council intends to levy the Special Tax for Fiscal Year 2009-2010 as authorized by the Ordinance and required by the Covenant; and WHEREAS, the City Council intends to provide for the collection of such Special Tax for Fiscal Year 2009-2010 by City staff: NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct. P652 SECTION 2: That the specific rate and amount of the Special Tax to be collected to pay for the costs and expenses for Fiscal Year 2009-2010 for the District is hereby determined and established as set forth Exhibit "A" to this Resolution, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference SECTION 3: That the rate as set forth above does not exceed the amount as previously authorized by Ordinance of this legislative body, and is not in excess of that as previously approved by the qualified electors of the District. SECTION 4: That the proceeds of the Special Tax shall be used to pay, in whole or in part, the costs of the following, in the following order of priority: A. Payment of principal and interest on any outstanding authorized bonded indebtedness; B. Necessary replenishment of bond reserve funds or other reserve funds; C. Payment of costs and expenses of authorized public facilities and public services, and incidental expenses pursuant to the Act; and D. Repayment of advances and loans, if appropriate. The proceeds of the special taxes shall be used as set forth above, and shall not be used for any other purpose. SECTION 5: The special tax shall be collected in the same manner as ordinary ad valorem property taxes are collected, and shall be subject to the same penalties and same procedure and sale in cases of any delinquency for ad valorem taxes, and the Tax Collector is hereby authorized to deduct reasonable administrative costs incurred in collecting any said special tax. SECTION 6: All monies collected pursuant to this Resolution shall be paid into the Community Facilities District funds, including any bond fend and reserve fund. SECTION 7: The Auditor of the County is hereby directed to enter in the next county assessment roll on which taxes will become due, opposite each lot or parcel of land effected in a space mazked "public improvements, special tax", or by any other suitable designation, the installment of the special tax, and for the exact rate and amount of said tax, reference is made to the attached Exhibit "A". SECTION 8: The County Auditor shall then, at the close of the tax collection period, promptly render to this Agency a detailed report showing the amount and/or amounts of such special tax installments, interest, penalties and percentages so collected and from what property collected, and also provide a statement of any percentages retained for the expense of making any such collection. P653 PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of June 2009. Donald J. Kurth, M.D., Mayor ATTEST: Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk I, JANICE C. REYNOLDS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a regulaz meeting of said City Council held on the day of June 2009. Executed this day of June 2009, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk P654 T H E C I T Y O F RA~N{C~`tIQO CUCAMONGA SICl.l11\ DATE: June 3, 2009 TO: Mayor and Members of City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: John R. Gillison, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services BY: Ingrid Y. Bruce, GIS/Special Districts Supervisor SUBJECT: APPROVAL TO SET ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO.2003-O1 (IMPROVEMENT AREA NO.2 ZONES 1 & 2, SERIES 2003-B). It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached Resolution setting the annual special tax for the new Community Facilities District No. 2003-01 (Improvement Area No. 2 Zones 1 & 2), Series 2003-A. Pursuant to Section 53340 and 53358 of the Government Code Mello-Roos Community Facilities District Act of 1982, the City Council is authorized to annually levy the tax rate to pay debt service on the bonds. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS On February 19, 2003, an election was held and the property owners within the boundary of Community Facilities District No. 2003-O1 (Improvement Area No. 2), Series 2003-B authorized the district to incur bonded indebtedness in the principal amount of $2,855,000. On Mazch 5, 2003, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 699 approving the levy of the special tax, and on May 21, 2003 approved Resolution No. 03-125 authorizing the issuance of bonds. The District consists of approximately 229 gross acres, of which 82 acres are designated as Improvement Area No. 2 (Zones 1 & 2). The District boundary is located in the eastern part of the City generally west of Interstate 15, south of Church Street, north of Arrow Route and east of Southern California Edison easement corridor from Arrow Route north, to Foothill Boulevard and Day Creek Boulevard from Foothill Boulevazd north, to Church Street. The District is located within the Victoria Community Plan of the City. P655 Page 2 June 3, 2009 City Council Staff Report CFD 2003-O1 (Improvement Area No. 2, Zones 1 & 2) Bonds were issued on August 20, 2003 to share in the provision of funds for the acquisition and construction of certain public street improvements, storm drain and flood control and water and sewer improvements to serve property located within the District and a cultural center owned by the City, including a performing arts center, public library and banquet halUmeeting room. This special tax shall be levied only so long as required for each pazcel of taxable property to dischazge bond obligations through the life of the bonds. Respectfully submitted, John R. Gillison Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services Attachments: Resolution Exhibit "A" Map P656 Resolution No. Page CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT N0.2003-O1 (IMPROVEMENT AREA N0.2, ZONES 1 & 2) SERIES 2003-B EXHIBIT "A" The Resolution establishing the annual special tax refers to this Exhibit for an explanation of the rate and method of apportionment of the Special Taxes for Fiscal Yeaz 2009/2010. CLASSIFICATION OF PARCELS Imarovemeat Area No. 2 Each Fiscal Year, all Taxable Property within Zone I and Zone 2 of CFD No. 2003-O1 (IA No. 2) shall be classified as Developed Property or Undeveloped Property, and shall be subject to the levy of Special Taxes in accordance with the rate and method of apportionment determined pursuant to the sections below. MAXIMUM SPECIAL TAX RATE 1. ZONE 1 a. Zone 1 Developed Property (i). Maximum Special Tax The Maximum Special Tax for each Assessor's Parcel in Zone 1 classified as Developed Property shall be the greater of (i) the amount derived by application of the Assigned Special Tax for Zone 1 or (ii) the amount derived by application of the Backup Special Tax for Zone 1. (ii). Assigned Special Tax The Assigned Special Tax for each Assessor's Parcel of Developed Property in Zone 1 of CFD No. 2003-01 (IA No. 2) shall equal $2,799 per Acre for Fiscal Yeaz 2003-04, and shall increase thereafter, commencing on July 1, 2004 and on July 1 P657 of each Fiscal Yeaz thereafter, by an amount equal to two percent (2%) of the Assigned Special Tax for the previous Fiscal Yeaz. (iii). Backup Special Tax The Backup Special Tax for each Assessor's Parcel of Developed Property in Zone 1 of CFD No. 2003-O1 (IA No. 2) shall equal $3,110 per Acre for Fiscal Yeaz 2003-04, and shall increase thereafter, commencing on July 1, 2004 and on July 1 of each Fiscal Yeaz thereafter, by an amount equal to two percent (2%) of the Backup Special Tax for the previous Fiscal Yeaz. b. Zone 1 Undeveloped Property The Maximum Special Tax for Undeveloped Property in Zone 1 of CFD No. 2003-O1 (IA No. 2) shall be $3,110 per Acre for Fiscal Yeaz 2003-04, and shall increase thereafter, commencing on July 1, 2004 and on July 1 of each Fiscal Year thereafter, by an amount equal to two percent (2%) of the Maximum Special Tax for the previous Fiscal Yeaz. 2. ZONE 2 a. Zone 2 Developed Property (i). Maximum Special Tax The Maximum Special Tax for each Assessor's Pazcel in Zone 2 classified as Developed Property shall be the greater of (i) the amount derived by application of the Assigned Special Tax for Zone 2 or (ii) the amount derived by application of the Backup Special Tax for Zone 2. (ii). Assigned Special Tax The Assigned Special Tax for each Assessor's Parcel of Developed Property in Zone 2 of CFD No. 2003-O1 (IA No. 2) shall equal $8,480 per Acre for Fiscal Year 2003-04, and shall increase thereafter, commencing on July 1, 2004 and on July 1 of each Fiscal Year thereafter, by an amount equal to two percent (2%) of the Assigned Special Tax for the previous Fiscal Yeaz. P658 (iii). Backup Special Tax The Backup Special Tax for each Assessor's Pazcel of Developed Property in Zone 2 of CFD No. 2003-01 (IA No. 2) shall equal $9,423 per Acre for Fiscal Yeaz 2003-04, and shall increase thereafter, commencing on July 1, 2004 and on July 1 of each Fiscal Yeaz thereafter, by an amount equal to two percent (2%) of the Backup Special Tax for the previous Fiscal Year. b. Zone 2 Undeveloped Property The Maximum Special Tax for Undeveloped Property in Zone 2 of CFD No. 2003-O1 (IA No. 2) shall be $9,423 per Acre for Fiscal Yeaz 2003-04, and shall increase thereafter, commencing on July 1, 2004 and on July 1 of each Fiscal Yeaz thereafter, by an amount equal to two percent (2%) of the Maximum Special Tax for the previous Fiscal Yeaz. D. METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT OF THE SPECIAL TAX 1. ZONE 1 Commencing with Fiscal Yeaz 2003-04 and for each following Fiscal Year, the Council shall determine the Zone 1 Special Tax Requirement and levy the Special Tax in Zone 1 until the amount of Special Taxes levied in Zone 1 is equal to the Zone 1 Special Tax Requirement. The Special Tax shall be levied in Zone 1 each Fiscal Yeaz as follows: First: The Special Tax shall be levied on each Assessor's Parcel of Developed Property in Zone 1 in an amount equal to 100% of the Assigned Special Tax for Developed Property; Second: If additional monies aze needed to satisfy the Zone 1 Special Tax Requirement after the first step has been completed, the Special Tax shall be levied Proportionately on each Assessor's Pazcel of Undeveloped Property in Zone 1 at up to 100% of the Maximum Special Tax for Undeveloped Property; Third: If additional monies are needed to satisfy the Zone 1 Special Tax Requirement after the first two steps have been completed, then the levy of the Special Tax on each Assessor's Pazcel of Developed Property in Zone 1 whose Maximum Special Tax is equal to the Backup Special Tax shall be increased Proportionately from the Assigned Special Tax up to the Maximum Special Tax for each such Assessor's Pazcel. Notwithstanding the above, the Council may in any Fiscal Year levy Proportionately less than 100% of the Assigned Special Tax in step one P659 (above) when the Council no longer must levy a Special Tax in Zone 1 pursuant to steps two and three above, and (i) all authorized CFD No. 2003-O1 (IA No. 2) Bonds have aheady been issued, or (ii) the Council has covenanted that it will not issue any additional CFD No. 2003-O1 (IA No. 2) Bonds (except refunding bonds) to be supported by Special Taxes levied under this Rate and Method of Apportionment. 2. ZONE 2 Commencing with Fiscal Yeaz 2003-04 and for each following Fiscal Year, the Council shall determine the Zone 2 Special Tax Requirement and levy the Special Tax in Zone 2 until the amount of Special Taxes levied in Zone 2 is equal to the Zone 2 Special Tax Requirement. The Special Tax shall be levied in Zone 2 each Fiscal Yeaz as follows: First: The Special Tax shall be levied on each Assessor's Pazcel of Developed Property in Zone 2 in an amount equal to 100% of the Assigned Special Tax for Developed Property; Second: If additional monies aze needed to satisfy the Zone 2 Special Tax Requirement after the first step has been completed, the Special Tax shall be levied Proportionately on each Assessor's Parcel of Undeveloped Property in Zone 2 at up to 100% of the Maximum Special Tax for Undeveloped Property; Third: If additional monies are needed to satisfy the Zone 2 Special Tax Requirement after the first two steps have been completed, then the levy of the Special Tax on each Assessor's Pazcel of Developed Property in Zone 2 whose Maximum Special Tax is equal to the Backup Special Tax shall be increased Proportionately from the Assigned Special Tax up to the Maximum Special Tax for each such Assessor's Parcel. Notwithstanding the above, the Council may in any Fiscal Year levy Proportionately less than 100% of the Assigned Special Tax in step one (above) when the Council no longer must levy a Specia] Tax in Zone 2 pursuant to steps two and three above, and (i) all authorized CFD No. 2003-01 (IA No. 2) Bonds have already been issued, or (ii) the Council has covenanted that it will not issue any additional CFD No. 2003-01 (IA No. 2) Bonds (except refunding bonds) to be supported by Special Taxes levied under this Rate and Method of Apportionment. E. 1. ZONE 1 No Special Tax shall be levied on Public Property in Zone 1. 2. ZONE 2 No Special Tax shall be levied on Public Property in Zone 2. P660 ~ m ~ y m ~ ~ ~~ M Ifs (n N N O ~_ W N N d d O ~ aN.. W Q Q ~ `4~1 ~ > J O > i ® N Q T ~ o o O a~ ~ C O E E yr ° U O .y 3 ~ ~ ~~y o ~ ~ N i .._.._.._.._ ~ J V g y ; d o ~ ~ ~ m ~ '~ ! y r 3 j m o 0 1 ti Q V _.._.. ~ ! i n`d ise3 in 1 ® ~ t v ny epuennl;3 ny epuennp3 ~= i 1 aaJ e ~9 ~._.~.._~ .._.._. i ~ ny Ja}sayooa ny Ja}sayoob v ,.._ ny ua~!II!W ~ .._.._.._.._ ny ua~lll!W i i i ny uaneH • ny uaneH i i ny esowJaH ~ ny esowJaH i nb' Pleq!yoJy ; nH Pleq!UOJV 1 ! N ny uewllaH ny uewllaH i ~ L 1 :~•• L v ny p e~(awn i 4i•ip~c1 pEac 3S ue!lawe~~ @@ pplFL g~gl ;£a$E~E~d°E 'O • ~z la€j "ta~i~ 1 t• 15$~!E@ja5~y ~ ~ m w ee pj 9g} pgpg V C g3~iL~"~~~ie 6 w m Ls L'~aggY~~;1 cz~ ~S3a>fad t~ U FEFafiLE a1E~ P661 T H E C I T Y O F RANCHO CUCAMONGA SlC1~Ll 1\~l 1. DATE: June 3, 2009 TO: Mayor and Members of City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: John R. Gillison, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Servi BY: Ingrid Y. Bruce, GIS/Special Districts Manager SUBJECT: APPROVAL TO SET ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT N0.2004-O1 (RANCHO ETIWANDA ESTATES) WITH NO INCREASE TO THE CURRENT RATE. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached Resolution setting the annual special tax for Community Facilities District No. 2004-01 (Rancho Etiwanda Estates). Pursuant to Section 53340 and 53358 of the Government Code Mello-Roos Community Facilities District Act of 1982, the City Council is authorized to annually levy the tax rate to pay debt service on the bonds. There is no increase to the current rate for fiscal year 2009/2010. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS On September 15, 2004 an election was held and the property owners within the boundary of Community Facilities District No. 2004-01 authorized the district to incur bonded indebtedness in the maximum principal amount of $45,000,000. On October 6, 2004, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 735 approving the levy of the special tax, and on June 7, 2006 approved Resolution No. 06-185 authorizing the issuance of bonds. The District was authorized to finance the following improvements: (a) Day Creek Boulevard - grading, storm drain, sewer, water, dry utilities, streets and landscaping; (b) Etiwanda Avenue -grading, sewer, water, dry utilities, streets and landscaping; (c) Cucamonga Valley Water District ("CV WD") reservoir transmission main; (d) storm drain facilities including the northern property line storm drain and the Etiwanda Avenue storm drain: (e) park facilities; (f) equestrian facilities; (g) school facilities to be owned by the Etiwanda School P662 Page 2 June 3, 2009 City Council Staff Report CFD 2004-O1 District and by the Chaffey Joint Union High School District; (h) water and sewer facilities to be owned by CVWD which are authorized to be financed from the proceeds of capacity chazges levied by CVWD; (i) flood control facilities to be owned by the San Bemazdino County Flood Control District; and (j) open space to be owned by the County of San Bernazdino. Bonds were issued on July 13, 2006 to share in the provision of funds for the acquisition and construction of certain public facilities, to serve property located within the District. This special tax shall be levied only so long as required for each parcel of taxable property to dischazge bond obligations through the life of the bonds. Attachments: Resolution Annual Status Report Map P663 RESOLUTION NO. 09_ I ~ l A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RE-ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 2004-O1 (RANCHO ETIWANDA ESTATES) FOR FISCAL YEAR 2009-2010 Recitals WHEREAS, by its Resolution No. 04-295, adopted on September 15, 2004, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California (the "City Council"), pursuant to the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982 (Section 53311 and following of the California Government Code) (the "Act") established City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Facilities District No. 2004- 01 (the "District"); and WHEREAS, at an election held on September 15, 2004, the qualified electors unanimously approved the levy of a special tax (the "Special Tax"); and WHEREAS, by its Ordinance No. 735 (the "Ordinance"), adopted on October 06, 2004 the City Council authorized the levy of the Special Tax in accordance with the Act; and WHEREAS, on June 28, 2006, the District delivered its $43,545,000 City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Facilities District No. 2004-O1 Special Tax Bonds (the "Bonds"); and WHEREAS, in a Fiscal Agent Agreement dated as of May Ol, 2006 by and between the City and Wells Fazgo Bank, National Association (the "Fiscal Agent"), the City covenanted to fix and levy the Special Tax for each fiscal yeaz in an amount required for the payment of principal and interest on the Bonds becoming due and payable during that fiscal yeaz, plus administrative expenses, but taking into account certain balances in funds held by the Fiscal Agent (the "Covenant"); and WHEREAS, interest will become due and payable on the Bonds during Fiscal Yeaz 2009- 2010 in anamount exceeding funds held by the Fiscal Agent and designated for the payment for such interest; and WHEREAS, the City Council intends to levy the Special Tax for Fiscal Year 2009-2010 as authorized by the Ordinance and required by the Covenant; and WHEREAS, the City Council intends to provide for the collection of such Special Tax for Fiscal Year 2009-2010 by City staff. NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the above recitals aze all true and correct. P664 SECTION 2: That the specific rate and amount of the Special Tax to be collected to pay for the costs and expenses for Fiscal Yeaz 2009-2010 for the District is hereby determined and established as set forth Exhibit "A" to this Resolution, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference SECTION 3: That the rate as set forth above does not exceed the amount as previously authorized by Ordinance of this legislative body, and is not in excess of that as previously approved by the qualified electors of the District. SECTION 4: That the proceeds of the Special Tax shall be used to pay, in whole or in part, the costs of the following, in the following order of priority: A. Payment of principal and interest on any outstanding authorized bonded .indebtedness; B. Necessary replenishment of bond reserve funds or other reserve funds; C. Payment of costs and expenses of authorized public facilities and public services, and incidental expenses pursuant to the Act; and D. Repayment of advances and loans, if appropriate. The proceeds of the special taxes shall be used as set forth above, and shall not be used for any other purpose. SECTION 5: The special tax shall be collected in the same manner as ordinary ad valorem property taxes aze collected, and shall be subject to the same penalties and same procedure and sale in cases of any delinquency for ad valorem taxes, and the Tax Collector is hereby authorized to deduct reasonable administrative costs incurred in collecting any said special tax. SECTION 6: All monies collected pursuant to this Resolution shall be paid into the Community Facilities District funds, including any bond fund and reserve fund. SECTION 7: The Auditor of the County is hereby directed to enter in the next county assessment roll on which taxes will become due, opposite each lot or parcel of land effected in a space mazked "public improvements, special tax", or by any other suitable designation, the installment of the special tax, and for the exact rate and amount of said tax, reference is made to the attached Annual Report SECTION 8: The County Auditor shall then, at the close of the tax collection period, promptly render to this Agency a detailed report showing the amount and/or amounts of such special tax installments, interest, penalties and percentages so collected and from what property collected, and also provide a statement of any percentages retained for the expense of making any such collection. P665 PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of June 2009. Donald J. Kurth, M.D., Mayor ATTEST: Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk I, JANICE C. REYNOLDS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the day of June 2009. Executed this day of June 2009, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk P666 Resolution No. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT N0.2004-O1 (RANCHO ETIWANDA ESTATES) EXHIBIT "A" The Resolution establishing the annual special tax refers to this Exhibit for an explanation of the rate and method of apportionment of the Special Taxes for Fiscal Yeaz 2009/2010. CLASSIFICATION OF PARCELS Each Fiscal Yeaz, all Taxable Property within CFD No. 2004A1 shall be classified as Developed Property, Taxable Public Property, Taxable Property Owner Association Property, or Undeveloped Property, and shall be subject to Special Taxes in accordance with the rate and method of apportionment determined pursuant to Sections C and E below. Residential Property shall be assigned to Land Use Classes 1 through 5 and Non-Residential Property shall be assigned to Land Use Class 6. The Maximum Special Tax for Residential Property shall be based on the Residential Floor Area of the dwelling unit(s) located on the Assessor's Parcel. The Maximum Special Tax for Non-Residential Property shall be based on the Acreage of the Assessor's Parcel. The Maximum Special Tax for any Assessor's Parcel of Developed Property containing more than one Land Use Class shall be determined pursuant to Section C below. A. MAXIMUM SPECIAL TAX Developed Property (a) Maximum Special Tax The Maximum Special Tax for each Assessor's Parcel classified as Developed Property is shown below in Table 1. P667 TABLE 1 Maximum Special Tax for Developed Property in Community Facilities District No. 2004-O1 Land Use Class Description Residential Floor Area Maximum Special Tax 1 Residential Property more than 4,000 SF $5,555 per unit 2 Residential Property 3,801 - 4,000 SF $5,325 per unit 3 Residential Property 3,601 - 3,800 SF $5,151 per unit 4 Residential Property 3,400 - 3,600 SF $4,896 per unit 5 Residential Property less than 3,400 SF $4,410 per unit 6 Non-Residential Property NA $19,813 per Acre (a) Multiple Land Use Classes Tn some instances an Assessor's Parcel of Developed Property may contain more than one Land Use Class. The Maximum Special Tax levied on an Assessor's Pazcel shall be the sum of the Maximum Special Taxes for all Land Use Classes located on that Assessor's Parcel. For an Assessor's Parcel that contains both Residential Property and Non-Residential Properly, the Acreage of such Assessor's Parcel shall be allocated to each type of property based on the amount of Acreage designated for each land use as determined by reference to the site plan approved for such Assessor's Parcel. The CFD Administrator's allocation to each type of property shall be final. 2. Undeveloped Property, Taxable Public Property, and Taxable Properly Owner Association Property (a) Maximum Special Tax The Maximum Special Tax for Undeveloped Property, Taxable Public Property, and Taxable Property Owner Association Property shall be $21,216 per Acre. P668 B. SPECIAL TAX BUYDOWN All of the requirements of this Section D, which describes the need for a Special Tax Buydown that may result from a change in development as determined pursuant to this Section D, shall only apply after the sale of Bonds by CFD No. 2004-01. The following definitions apply to this Section: "Certificate of Satisfaction of Special Tax Buydown" means a certificate from the CFD Administrator stating that the property described in such certificate has sufficiently met the Special Tax Buydown Requirement for such property as calculated under this Section. "Letter of Compliance" means a letter from the CFD Administrator allowing the issuance of building permits based on the prior submittal of a Request for Letter of Compliance by a property owner. "Special Tax Buydown Requirement" means the total amount of Special Tax Buydown necessary to be prepaid to permit the issuance of building permits listed in a Request for Letter of Compliance, as calculated under this Section D. "Update Property" means an Assessor's Parcel of Undeveloped Property for which a building permit has been issued. For purposes of all calculations in this Section D, Update Property shall be taxed as if it were already Developed Property during the current Fiscal Yeaz. 1. Request for Letter of Compliance The CFD Administrator must submit a Letter of Compliance to the City for a specific Assessor's Parcel or lot prior to the issuance by the City of a building permit for the construction of any residential and/or non-residential development on that Assessor's Pazcel or lot. If a Letter of Compliance has not yet been issued, and a property owner wishes to request a building permit for an Assessor's Parcel or lot, the property owner must first request a Letter of Compliance from the CFD Administrator. The request from the property owner shall contain a list of all building permits currently being requested, the Assessor's Parcels or tract and lot numbers on which the construction is to take place, and the Residential Floor Area (for each residential dwelling unit) or the Acreage (for each non-residential parcel) associated with each building permit. 2. Issuance of Letter of Compliance Upon the receipt of a Request for Letter of Compliance, the CFD Administrator shall assign each building permit identified in such request to Land Use Classes 1 through 6 as listed in Table 2 below, based on the type of use and the Residential Floor Area identified for each such building permit. If the CFD Administrator determines (i) that the number of building permits requested for each Land Use Class, plus those building permits previously issued For each Land Use Class, will not cause the total number of residential units or non-residential Acreage within any such Land Use Class to exceed the number of units or Acreage for such Land Use Class identified in Table 2 below, and (ii) that the total number of residential dwelling units anticipated to be constructed pursuant to the current development plan for CFD No. 2004-01 shall not be less than 632, then a Letter of Compliance shall be submitted to the City by the CFD Administrator approving the issuance of the requested building permits. This Letter of Compliance shall be submitted to the City by the CFD Administrator within ten days of the submittal of the Request for Letter of Compliance by the property owner. However, should (i) the building permits requested, plus those previously issued, cause the total number of residential units or non- residential Acreage within any such Land Use Class to exceed the number of units or non- residential Acreage for such Land Use Class identified in Table 2 below, or (ii) the CFD Administrator determine that changes in the development plan may cause a decrease in the P669 number of residential dwelling units within CFD No. 2004-01 to below 632 dwelling units, then a Letter of Compliance will not be issued and the CFD Administrator will be directed to determine if a Special Tax Buydown shall be required. P670 TABLE 2 Expected Dwelling Units and Non-Residential Acreage per Land Use Class Community Facilities District No. 2004-O1 Land Use Class Description .Residential Floor Area Number of Units/Acres 1 Residential Property more than 4,000 SF 70 units 2 Residential Property 3,801 - 4,000 SF 110 units 3 Residential Property 3,601 - 3,800 SF 185 units 4 Residential Property 3,401 - 3,600 SF 92 units 5 Residential Property less than 3,400 SF 175 units 6 Non-Residential Property NA 0.00 acres 3. Calculation of Special Tax Buydowu If a Special Tax Buydown calculation is required as a result of item 2, above, the CFD Administrator shall review the cun•ent development plan for CFD No. 2004-01 in consultation with the current property owners for all remaining Undeveloped Property in CFD No. 2004-O1, and shall prepare an updated version of Table 2 identifying the revised number of units or non- residential Acreage anticipated within each Land Use Class. The CFD Administrator shall not be responsible for any delays in preparing the updated Table 2 that result from a refusal on the part of one or more current property owners of Undeveloped Property to provide information on thew future development. The CFD Administrator shall then review the updated Table 2 and determine the Special Tax Buydown Requirement, if any, to be applied to the property identified in the Request for Letter of Compliance to assure the CFD's ability to collect special taxes equal to 110% debt service coverage on the Outstanding Bonds, plus the cost of annual CFD administration. The calculations shall be undertaken by the CFD Administrator, based on the data in the updated Table 2, as follows: Step 1. Compute the sum of the Maximum Special Tax to be levied on all Developed Property and Update Property within CFD No. 2004-O1, plus the sum of the Maximum Special Tax to be levied on all future development as identified in the current development plan as determined by the CFD Administrator in consultation with the property owner(s). Step 2. Determine the amount of Special Tax required to provide 110% debt service coverage on the Outstanding Bonds, plus any other costs associated with the Special Tax Requirement. Step 3. If the total sum computed pursuant to step I is greater than or equal to the amount computed pursuant to step 2, then no Special Tax Buydown will be P671 required and a Letter of Compliance shall immediately be issued by the CFD Administrator For all of the building permits currently being requested. If the total sum computed pursuant to step 1 is less than the amount computed pursuant to step 2, then continue to step 4. Step 4. Determine the Maximum Special Tax shortfall by subtracting the total sum computed pursuant to step 1 from the amount computed pursuant to step 2. Divide this Maximum Special Tax shortfall by the amount computed pursuant to step 2. Step 5. The Special Tax Buydown Requirement shall be calculated using the prepayment formula described in Section I.1, with the following exceptions: (i) skip Paragraphs 1, 2 and 3, and begin with Paragraph 4; (ii) the Bond Redemption Amount in Paragraph 4 of the prepayment formula described in Section I.1 shall equal the product of the quotient computed pursuant to step 4 above times the Previously Issued Bonds, as defined in Section L1; (iii) the Capitalized Interest Credit described in Pazagraph 11 of Section L l shall be $0; and (iv) any payments of the Special Tax Buydown (less Administrative Fees and Expenses) shall be disbursed pursuant to the Indenture. The Special Tax Buydown computed under step 5 shall be billed directly to the property owner of each Assessor's Pazcel identified in the Request for Letter of Compliance and shall be due within 30 days of the billing date. If the Special Tax Buydown is not paid within 45 days of the billing date, a delinquent penalty of 10 percent shall be added to the Special Tax Buydown. Upon receipt of the Special Tax Buydown payment, the CFD Administrator shall issue a Letter of Compliance and a Certificate of Satisfaction of Special Tax Buydown for the subject property. 4. Costs and Expenses Related to Implementation of Special Tax Buydown The property owner of each Assessor's Pazcel identified in the Request for Letter of Compliance shall pay all costs of the CFD Administrator or other consultants required to review the application for building permits, calculate the Special Tax Buydown, issue Letters of Compliance or any other actions required under Section D. Such payments shall be due 30 days after receipt of invoice by such property owner. A deposit may be required by the CFD Administrator prior to undertaking work related to the Special Tax Buydown. C. METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT OF THE SPECIAL TAX Commencing with Fiscal Year 2005-06 and for each following Fiscal Year, the Council shall determine the Special Tax Requirement and shall levy the Special Tax until the total Special Tax levy equals the Special Tax Requirement. The Special Tax shall be levied each Fiscal Year as follows: First: The Special Tax shall be levied on each Assessor's Parcel of Developed Property in an amount equal to 100% of the applicable Maximum Special Tax; Second: If additional monies are needed to satisfy the Special Tax Requirement after the first step has been completed, the Special Tax shall be levied Proportionately on each Assessor's Parcel of Undeveloped Property at up to 100% of the Maximum Special Tax for Undeveloped Property; Third: If additional monies aze needed to satisfy the Special Tax Requirement after the first two steps have been completed, then the Special Tax shall be levied Proportionately on each P672 Assessor's Parcel of Taxable Property Owner Association Property at up to the Maximum Special Tax for Taxable Property Owner Association Property; Fourth: If additional monies aze needed to satisfy the Special Tax Requirement aRer the first three steps have been completed, then the Special Tax shall be levied Proportionately on each Assessor's Parcel of Taxable Public Property at up to the Maximum Special Tax for Taxable Public Property; Notwithstanding the above the Council may, in any Fiscal Year, lery Proportionately less than 100% of the Maximum Special Tax in step one (above), when (i) the Council is no longer required to levy the Special Tax pursuant to steps two through four above in order to meet the Special Tax Requirement; and (ii) all authorized CFD No. 2004-0I Bonds have already been issued or the Council has covenanted that it will not issue any additional CFD No. 2004-01 Bonds (except refunding bonds) to be supported by the Special Tax. Further notwithstanding the above, under no circumstances will the Special Tax levied against any Assessor's Parcel of Residential Property for which an occupancy pemvt for private residential use has been issued be increased by more than ten percent as a consequence of delinquency or default by the owner of any other Assessor's Parcel within CFD No. 2004-01. D. No Special Tax shall be levied on up to 78.75 Acres of Public Property and/or Property Owner Association Property. Tax-exempt status will be irrevocably assigned by the CFD Administrator in the chronological order in which property becomes Public Property or Property Owner Association Property. However, should an Assessor's Parcel no longer be classified as Public Property or Property Owner Association Property its tax-exempt status will be revoked. Public Property or Property Owner Association Property that is not exempt from the Special Tax under this section shall be subject to the levy of the Special Tax and shall be taxed Proportionately as part of the third and fourth steps in Section E above, at up to 100% of the applicable Maximum Special Tax for Taxable Public Property or Taxable Property Owner Association Property. E. APPEALS AND INTERPRETATIONS Any landowner or resident who feels that the amount of the Special Tax levied on their Assessor's Parcel is in enor may submit a written appeal to CFD No. 2004-01. The CFD Administrator shall review the appeal and if the CFD Administrator concurs, the amount of the Special Tax levied shall be appropriately modified. The Council may interpret this Amended and Restated Rate and Method of Apportionment of Special Tax for purposes of clarifying any ambiguity and make determinations relative to the annual administration of the Special Tax and any landowner or resident appeals. Any decision of the Council shall be final and binding as to all persons. F. MANNER OF COLLECTION The Special Tax will be collected in the same manner and at the same time as ordinary ad valorem property taxes; provided, however, that CFD No. 2004-01 may directly bill the Special Tax, may collect Special Taxes at a different time or in a different manner if necessary to meet its financial obligations, and may covenant to foreclose and may actually foreclose on delinquent Assessor's Parcels as permitted by the Act. P673 G. PREPAYMENT OF SPECIAL TAX The following definition applies to this Section: "Previously Issued Bonds" means, for any Fiscal Yeaz, all Outstanding Bonds that aze deemed to be outstanding under the Indenture after the first interest and/or principal payment date following the current Fiscal Year. Only an Assessor's Parcel of Developed Property, or Undeveloped Property For which a building permit has been issued, may be prepaid. The Special Tax obligation applicable to an Assessor's Parcel in CFD No. 2004-01 may only be prepaid after al] authorized CFD No. 2004-01 Bonds have already been issued, or after the Council has covenanted that it will not issue any additional CFD No. 2004-01 Bonds (except refunding bonds) to be supported by Special Taxes levied under this Amended and Restated Rate and Method of Apportionment. The obligation of the Assessor's Pazcel to pay any Special Tax may be permanently satisfied as described herein, provided that a prepayment may be made with respect to a particular Assessor's Parcel only if there are no delinquent Special Taxes with respect to such Assessor's Pazcel at the time of prepayment. An owner of an Assessor's Parcel intending to prepay the Special Tax obligation shall provide the CFD Administrator with written notice of intent to prepay. Within 30 days of receipt of such written notice, the CFD Administrator shall notify such owner of the prepayment amount of such Assessor's Parcel. Prepayment must be made not less than 45 days prior to any redemption date for the CFD No. 2004-01 Bonds to be redeemed with the proceeds of such prepaid Special Taxes. The Prepayment Amount (defined below) shall be calculated as summarized below (capitalized terms as defined below): Bond I plus plus plus less less Total: equals :edemption Amount Redemption Premium Defeasance Amount . Administrative Fees and Expenses Reserve Fund Credit Capitalized interest Credit Prepayment Amount As of the proposed date of prepayment, the Prepayment Amount (defined below) shall be calculated as follows: Para¢raoh No.: Confirm that no Special Tax delinquencies apply to such Assessor's Parcel. For Assessor's Parcels of Developed Property, compute the Maximum Special Tax for the Assessor's Parcel to be prepaid. For Assessor's Pazcels of Undeveloped Property for which building permits have already been issued, compute the Maximum Special Tax for the Assessor's Parcel to be prepaid as though it were already designated as Developed Property, based upon the building permit which has been issued for that Assessor's Parcel. Divide the Maximum Special Tax computed pursuant to paragraph 2 by the estimated Maximum Special Taxes for CFD No. 2004-01 based on the Developed Property Special Taxes which could be charged in the current Fiscal Year on all expected development in CFD No. 2004-01, excluding any Assessor's Parcels which have been prepaid; and P674 4. Multiply the quotient computed pursuant to paragraph 3 by the Previously Issued Bonds to compute the amount of Previously Issued Bonds to be retired and prepaid; and 5. Multiply the Bond Redemption Amount computed pursuant to paragraph 4 by the applicable redemption premium (e.g., the redemption price - 100%), if any, on the Previously Issued Bonds to be redeemed (the "Redemption Premium"). 6. Compute the amount needed to pay interest on the Bond Redemption Amount from the first bond interest and/or principal payment date not covered by the current Fiscal Yeaz Special Taxes until the eazliest redemption date for the Previously Issued Bonds. 7. Determine the Special Taxes levied on the Assessor's Pazcel in the current Fiscal Yeaz that have not yet been paid. 8. Add the amounts computed pursuant to paragraphs 6 and 7. 9. Compute the net present value of the amount computed pursuant to pazagraph 8, using as a discount rate the rate of return reasonably assumed for the conservative investment of these funds by the CFD Administrator (the "Defeasance Amount"). 10. The administrative fees and expenses of CFD No. 2004-O1 are as calculated by the CFD Administrator and include the costs of computation of the prepayment, the costs to invest the prepayment proceeds, the costs of redeeming CFD No. 2004-01 Bonds, and the costs of recording any notices to evidence the prepayment and the redemption (the "Administrative Fees and Expenses"). t 1. The reserve fund credit (the "Reserve Fund Credit") shall equal the lesser of: (a) the expected reduction in the reserve requirement (as defined in the Indenture), if any, associated with the redemption of Previously Issued Bonds as a result of the prepayment, or (b) the amount derived by subtracting the new reserve requirement (as defined in the Indenture) in effect after the redemption of Previously Issued Bonds as a result of the prepayment from the balance in the reserve fund on the prepayment date, but in no event shall such amount be less than zero. No Reserve Fund Credit shall be granted if the amount then on deposit in the reserve fund for the Previously Issued Bonds is below 100% of the reserve requirement (as defined in the Indenture). 12. If any capitalized interest for the Previously Issued Bonds will not have been expended as of the date immediately following the first bond interest and/or principal payment date following the current Fiscal Year, a capitalized interest credit shall be calculated by multiplying the quotient computed pursuant to paragraph 3 by the expected balance in the capitalized interest fund after such first interest and/or principal payment (the "Capitalized Interest Credit"). 13. The Special Tax prepayment is equal to the sum of the amounts computed pursuant to paragraphs 4, 5, 9, and 10, less the amounts computed pursuant to pazagraphs I 1 and 12 (the "Prepayment Amount"). From the Prepayment Amount, the amounts computed pursuant to paragraphs 4, 5, 9, 10,11 and 12 shall be deposited into the appropriate fund as established under the Indenture and be used to redeem Previously Issued Bonds, as applicable, or make scheduled debt service payments or to pay administrative expenses related to the prepayment of the Special Tax. P675 The Prepayment Amount may be insufficient to redeem a full $5,000 increment of CFD No. 2004-01 Bonds. hi such cases, the increment above $5,000 or integral multiple thereof will be retained in the appropriate fund established under the Indenture to be used with the next prepayment of CFD No. 2004-O1 Bonds or to make scheduled debt service payments on such bonds. Upon confirmation of the payment of the current Fiscal Year's Special Tax levy as determined under pazagraph 7 (above), the CFD Administrator shall remove the current Fiscal Yeaz's Special Tax levy for such Assessor's Parcel from the County tax rolls. With respect to any Assessor's Pazcel for which the Special Tax obligation is prepaid in full in accordance with this Section I., the Council shall cause a suitable notice to be recorded in compliance with the Act, to indicate the prepayment of Special Taxes and the release of the Special Tax lien on such Assessor's Parcel, and the obligation of such Assessor's Pazcel to pay the Special Tax shall cease. Notwithstanding the foregoing, no Special Tax prepayment shall be allowed unless, at the time of such proposed prepayment, the amount of Maximum Special Taxes that may be levied on Taxable Property within CFD No. 2004-01 (after excluding 78.75 Acres of Public Property and Property Owner Association Property as set forth in Section F) both prior to and after the proposed prepayment is at least 1.1 times the maximum annual debt service on all Previously Issued Bonds, plus the cost of annual CFD administration. A. TERM OF SPECIAL TAX The Special Tax shall be levied for a period not to exceed fifty yeazs commencing with Fiscal Year 2005-06, provided however that Special Taxes will cease to be levied in an eazlier Fiscal Year if the CFD Administrator has determined (i) that all required interest and principal payments on the CFD No. 2004-01 Bonds have been paid; and (ii) all Authorized Facilities have been constructed. P676 ~ ~' o O ~ ~ O o .~ ° N J o V ' ~ ~ ~ a 0 L o ~ rx~ ~ ~ J ~ ~ Q i .. _.._.._.._ ~ ~ ~ c o ~ ~ m ~ . ~i + ~ ~ ~ t ~ .~ i 7 1 m Q O p •' ` ` Q ~ ~ nd ~Se~ U) ~ ® ~ ~ ~ i U6MI~~ ~ nd epU2Ml;3 ~~ EQ ~ .._.. L.._.._. .. 1 ~ O ny ~a~sayooy ny ~a~sayoo~ V ••- ~ i ~.. ny ua~{!II!W i i _.._.._.._. ny ua~!II!W i i ny uaneH ; i i ny uaneH ny esow~aH i i ~ ny esow~aH ny pleq!yo~y . i ny Pleq!yo~b i ny uewllaH i ny ~~• ..~ • uewllaH • ~ ~ .v •~ . ny p~e(aui/~ • ~ ~Sue!lawe~i ~ _ ;~~Fn~Sg ~..~~•~• ..~ ;a 'a2 ~a~~W~s / • * ~ • - ry g ~aliC E4e~p8~i .~u'~C~E $i 9 ~. _.._~ ~ •~. ~ • ._..~ _ ny anoa~ F ~~ t n~;°az=_€~ cps .~ .. ~.._.._ _ ~ ~ 0 ` E~`B~~E'c~s~P C m o L.L Q ERIC to~~ACA gol °:~% r r ~ T ~~us 6 g S~°eHE BEy A~e~ ~°~ ~ oy ~ C N ~ = CO = ~egs.~9~cp~a ;d~~'sEaP-a~ E yE&ESaY~s~ „ e a5~ n ~ ~ B a s .E x p ~~ ~UF~$°uE i°~ s U ~~~A~:~e ~oE T H E C I T Y O F RANCHO CUCAMONGA SlQll l\ DATE: June 3, 2009 TO: Mayor and Members of City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: John R. Gillison, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Servic~~_3~ BY: Ingrid Y. Bruce, GIS/Special Districts Manager SUBJF.CI': APPROVAL TO SET ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT N0.2006-O1 (VINTNER'S GROVE) WITH NO INCREASE TO THE CURRENT RATE. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached Resolution setting the annual special tax for Community Facilities District No. 2006-01 (Vintner's Grove). Pursuant to Section 53340 and 53358 of the Government Code Mello-Roos Community Facilities District Act of 1982, the City Council is authorized to annually levy the tax rate to pay debt service on the bonds. There is no increase from the current tax rate for fiscal year 2009/2010. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS On October 18, 2006, an election was held and the property owners within the boundary of Community Facilities District No. 2006-01 authorized the District to incur bonded indebtedness in the principal amount of $5,800,000. On November 1, 2006, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 769 approving the levy of the special tax, and on December 20, 2006 approved Resolution No. 06-401 authorizing the issuance of bonds. The District boundary is located on the south side of Arrow Route with Haven Avenue on the east and Center Street on the west. Bonds were issued on January 25, 2007 to shaze in the provision of funds for the acquisition and of street improvements, landscape improvements within the public right-of--way, and water and sewer improvements. P677 P678 Page 2 June 3, 2009 City Council Staff Report CFD 2006-O1 (Vintner's Grove) This special tax shall be levied only so long as required for each parcel of taxable property to discharge bond obligations through the life of the bonds. Attachments: Resolution Exhibit "A" Map P679 RESOLUTION NO. D q- lz A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RE-ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 2006-01 (VINTNER'S GROVE) FOR FISCAL YEAR 2009-2010 Recitals WHEREAS, by its Resolution No. 06-322, adopted on October 18, 2006, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California (the "City Council"), pursuant to the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982 (Section 53311 and following of the California Government Code) (the "Act") established City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Facilities District No. 2006-01 (the "District"); and WHEREAS, at an election held on October 18, 2006, the qualified electors unanimously approved the levy of a special tax (the "Special Tax"); and WHEREAS, by its Ordinance No. 769 (the "Ordinance"), adopted on November 1, 2006 the City Council authorized the levy of the Special Tax in accordance with the Act; and WHEREAS, on January 25, 2007, the District delivered its $5,800,000 City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Facilities District No. 2006-O1 Special Tax Bonds (the "Bonds"); and WHEREAS, in a Fiscal Agent Agreement dated as of January O1, 2007 by and between the City and Wells Fazgo Bank, National Association (the "Fiscal Agent"), the City covenanted to fix and levy the Special Tax for each fiscal year in an amount required for the payment of principal and interest on the Bonds becoming due and payable during that fiscal year, plus administrative expenses, but taking into account certain balances in funds held by the Fiscal Agent (the "Covenant"); and WHEREAS, principal and interest will become due and payable on the Bonds during Fiscal Year 2009-2010 in an amount exceeding funds held by the Fiscal Agent and designated for the payment for such principal and interest; and WHEREAS, the City Council intends to levy the Special Tax for Fiscal Year 2009-2010 as authorized by the Ordinance and required by the Covenant; and WHEREAS, the City Council intends to provide for the collection of such Special Tax for Fiscal Yeaz 2009-2010 by City staff. NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2: That the specific rate and amount of the Special Tax to be collected to pay for the costs and expenses for Fiscal Year 2009-2010 for the District is hereby determined and established as set forth Exhibit "A" to this Resolution, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference P680 SECTION 3: That the rate as set forth above does not exceed the amount as previously authorized by Ordinance of this legislative body, and is not in excess of that as previously approved by the qualified electors of the District. SECTION 4: That the proceeds of the Special Tax shall be used to pay, in whole or in part, the costs of the following, in the following order of priority: A. Payment of principal and interest on any outstanding authorized bonded indebtedness; B. Necessary replenishment of bond reserve funds or other reserve funds; C. Payment of costs and expenses of authorized public facilities and public services, and incidental expenses pursuant to the Act; and D. Repayment of advances and loans, if appropriate. The proceeds of the special taxes shall be used as set forth above, and shall not be used for any other purpose. SECTION 5: The special tax shall be collected in the same manner as ordinary ad valorem property taxes are collected, and shall be subject to the same penalties and same procedure and sale in cases of any delinquency for ad valorem taxes, and the Tax Collector is hereby authorized to deduct reasonable administrative costs incurred in collecting any said special tax. SECTION 6: All monies collected pursuant to this Resolution shall be paid into the Community Facilities District funds, including any bond fund and reserve fund. SECTION 7: The Auditor of the County is hereby directed to enter in the next county assessment roll on which taxes will become due, opposite each lot or pazcel of land effected in a space mazked "public improvements, special tax", or by any other suitable designation, the installment of the special tax, and for the exact rate and amount of said tax, reference is made to the attached Exhibit "A". SECTION 8: The County Auditor shall then, at the close of the tax collection period, promptly render to this Agency a detailed report showing the amount and/or amounts of such special tax installments, interest, penalties and percentages so collected and from what property collected, and also provide a statement of any percentages retained for the expense of making any such collection. P681 PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of June 2009. Donald J. Kurth, M.D., Mayor ATTEST: Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk I, JANICE C. REYNOLDS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a regulaz meeting of said City Council held on the day of June 2009. Executed this day of June 2009, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk P682 Resolution No. Page CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO.2006-O1 (VINTNER'S GROVE) EXHIBIT "A" The Resolution establishing the annual special tax refers to this Exhibit for an explanation of the rate and method of apportionment of the Special Taxes for Fiscal Year 2009/2010. CLASSIFICATION OF PARCELS Each Fiscal Year, all Taxable Property within CFD No. 2006-O1 shall be classified as Developed Property or Undeveloped Property, and shall be subject to the levy of Special Taxes in accordance with the rate and method of apportionment determined pursuant to the sections below. MAXIMUM SPECIAL TAX RATE The Maximum Special Tax for each Assessor's Pazcel of Residential Property shall be based on the Residential Floor Area of the dwelling unit(s) located on such Assessor's Pazcel. The Maximum Special Tax for each Assessor's Pazcel of Non-Residential Property shall be based on the Acreage of such Assessor's Pazcel. The Maximum Special Tax for any Assessor's Pazcel of Developed Property containing more than one Land Use Class shall be determined is as follows: 1. Developed Property (a) Maximum Snecial Tax The Maximum Special Tax for each Assessor's Pazcel classified as Developed Property is shown below in Table 1. P683 TABLE 1 Maximum Special Tax for Developed Property in Community Facilities District No. 2006-O1 Land Use Class Description Residential Floor Area Maximum Special Tax 1 Single Family Detached Property More than 2,900 SF $3,687 per unit 2 Single Family Detached Property 2,601 - 2,900 SF $3,379 per unit 3 Single Family Detached Property 2,301 - 2,600 SF $3,244 per unit 4 Single Family Detached Property Less than 2,301 SF $3,109 per unit 5 Single Family Attached Property More than 1,850 SF $2,774 per unit 6 Single Family Attached Property 1,601 - 1,850 SF $2,678 per unit 7 Single Family Attached Property 1,351 - 1,600 SF $2,501 per unit 8 Single Family Attached Property Less than 1,351 SF $2,324 per unit 9 Non-Residential Property NA $49,234 per Acre (b) Multiple Land Use Classes In some instances an Assessor's Parcel of Developed Property may contain more than one Land Use Class. The Maximum Special Tax levied on such an Assessor's Pazcel shall be the sum of the Maximum Special Taxes for all Land Use Classes located on that Assessor's Parcei. For an Assessor's Pazcel that contains both Residential Property and Non-Residential Property, the Acreage of such Assessor's Parcel shall be allocated to each type of property based on the amount of Acreage, or equivalent entitlement, designated for each land use as determined by reference to the site plan approved by the City for such Assessor's Pazcel. The CFD Administrator's allocation to each type of property shall be final. 2. Undeveloped Property, Taxable Public Property, and Taxable Property Owner Association Property (a) Maximum Special Tax The Maximum Special Tax for Undeveloped Property, Taxable Public Property, and Taxable Property Owner Association Property shall be $54,668 per Acre. P684 A. SPECIAL TAX BUYDOWN All of the requirements of this Section D, which describes the need for a Special Tax Buydown that may result from a change in development as determined pursuant to this Section D, shall only apply after the issuance of the first series of CFD No. 2006- 01 Bonds. Prior to the issuance of the first series of CFD No. 2006-01 Bonds, the terms of the Special Tax Buydown shall not apply. The following additional definitions apply to this Section A: "Certificate of Satisfaction of Special Tax Buydowu" means a certificate from the CFD Administrator stating that the property described in such certificate has met the Special Tax Buydown Requirement for such property as calculated under this Section A. "Letter of Compliance" means a letter from the CFD Administrator allowing the issuance of building permits based on the prior submittal of a request for Letter of Compliance by a property owner. "Special Tax Buydown Requirement" means the total amount of Special Tax Buydown necessary to be prepaid in order to permit the issuance of building permits listed in a request for Letter of Compliance, as calculated under this Section A. "Update Property" means an Assessor's Parcel of Undeveloped Property for which a building permit has been issued. For purposes of all calculations in this Section A, Update Property shall be taxed as if it were already Developed Property during the current Fiscal Year. 1. Request for Letter of Compliance After the issuance of the first series of CFD No. 2006-01 Bonds, a property owner shall, as a precondition to the issuance of a building permit for construction of any residential and/or non-residential development for a specific Assessor's Pazcel or lot, submit a Letter of Compliance for the construction of the development on such Assessor's Parcel or lot. If a Letter of Compliance has not yet been issued, the property owner must first request a Letter of Compliance from the CFD Administrator. The request from the property owner shall contain a list of all building permits for which the property owner is requesting a Letter of Compliance, which may exceed the number of building pennit issuances being applied for at that time. The property owner shall also submit the Assessor's Parcels or tract and lot numbers on which the construction is to take place, and the Residential Floor Area (for each residential dwelling unit) or the Acreage (for each non-residential parcel) associated with each prospective building permit. P685 2. Issuance of Letter of Compliance Upon the receipt of a request for a Letter of Compliance, the CFD Administrator shall assign each building permit identified in such request to Land Use Classes 1 through 9 as listed in Table 2 below based on the type of use and, if applicable, the Residential Floor Area identified for each such building permit. If the CFD Administrator determines (i) that the number of building permits requested for each Land Use Class, plus those building permits previously issued for each Land Use Class, will not cause the total number of residential dwelling units or non-residential Acreage within any such Land Use Class to exceed the number of residential dwelling units or Acreage for such Land Use Class identified in Table 2 below, and (ii) that the total number of residential dwelling units anticipated to be constructed pursuant to the current development plan for CFD No. 2006-O1 shall not be less than 156 and the amount of non-residential Acreage will not be more than 0.0 Acres, then a Letter of Compliance shall be submitted to the City and/or property owner by the CFD Administrator approving the issuance of the requested building permits for the subject property, and such subject property shall no longer be subject to the terms of the Special Tax Buydown. This Letter of Compliance shall be submitted to the City and/or property owner by the CFD Administrator within ten days of the submittal of the request for Letter of Compliance by the property owner. However, should (i) the building permits requested, plus those previously issued, cause the total number of residential dwelling units or non-residential Acreage within any such Land Use Class to exceed the number of residential dwelling units or non-residential Acreage for such Land Use Class identified in -Table 2 below, or (ii) the CFD Administrator determine that changes in the development plan may cause a decrease in the number of residential dwelling units within CFD No. 2006-O1 to below 156 residential dwelling units or an increase in the amount ofnon-residential Acreage to above 0.0 Acres, then a Letter of Compliance will not be issued and the CFD Administrator will be directed to determine if a Special Tax Buydown shall be required. The number of residential dwelling units and non-residential Acreage, as listed in Table 2 below, may be updated by the CFD Administrator prior to the issuance of the first series of CFD No. 2006-01 Bonds. TABLE 2 Expected Residential Dwelling Units per Land Use Class and Non-Residential Acreage Community Facilities District No. 2006-O1 Land Use Class Description Residential Floor Area Number of Units/Acres 1 Single Family Detached Property More than 2,900 SF 22 units 2 Single Family Detached Property 2,601 - 2,900 SF 28 units 3 Single Family Detached Property 2,301 - 2,600 SF 0 units q Single Family Detached Property Less than 2,301 SF 28 units P686 Land Use Class Description Residential Floor Area Number of Units/Acres 5 Single Family Attached Property More than 1,850 SF 26 units 6 Single Family Attached Property 1,601 - 1,850 SF 26 units 7 Single Family Attached Property 1,351 - 1,600 SF 0 units 8 Single Family Attached Property Less than 1,351 SF 26 units 9 Non-Residential Property NA 0.00 Acres 3. Calculation of Special Tax Buydown If a Specia] Tax Buydown calculation is required as determined by the CFD Administrator pursuant to pazagraph 2 above, the CFD Administrator shall review the current development plan for CFD No. 2006-O1 in consultation with the current property owners for all remaining Undeveloped Property in CFD No. 2006-O1, and shall prepaze an updated version of Table 2 identifying the revised number of residential dwelling units or non-residential Acreage anticipated within each Land Use Class. The CFD Administrator shall not be responsible for any delays in preparing the updated Table 2 that result from a refusal on the part of one or more current property owners of Undeveloped Property to provide information on their future development. The CFD Administrator shall then review the updated Table 2 and detennine the Special Tax Buydown Requirement, if any, to be applied to the property identified in the request for Letter of Compliance to assure the CFD's ability to levy special taxes equal to 110% debt service coverage on the Outstanding Bonds, plus Administrative Expenses. The calculations shall be undertaken by the CFD Administrator, based on the data in the updated Table 2, as follows: Step 1. Compute the sum of the Maximum Special Tax authorized to be levied on all Developed Property and Update Property within CFD No. 2006- Ol,plus the sum of the Maximum Special Tax authorized to be levied on all future development as identified in the current development plan as detennined by the CFD Administrator in consultation with the property owner(s). Step 2. Determine the amount of Special Tax required to provide 110% debt service coverage on the Outstanding Bonds, plus any other payments included in [he Special Tax Requirement. Step 3. If the total sum computed pursuant to step I is greater than or equal to the amount computed pursuant to step 2, then no Special Tax Buydown will be required and a Letter of Compliance shall immediately be P687 issued by the CFD Administrator for all of the building permits currently being requested. If the total sum computed pursuant to step 1 is less than the amount computed pursuant to step 2, then continue to step 4. Step 4. Determine the Maximum Special Tax shortfall by subtracting the total sum computed pursuant to step 1 from the amount computed pursuant to step 2. Divide this Maximum Special Tax shortfall by the amount computed pursuant to step 2. Step 5. The Special Tax Buydown Requirement shall be calculated using the prepayment formula described in Section A, with the following exceptions: (i) skip Paragraphs 1, 2 and 3, and begin with Paragraph 4; (ii) the Bond Redemption Amount in Paragraph 4 of the prepayment formula described in Section I shall equal the product of the quotient computed pursuant to step 4 above times the Previously Issued Bonds, as defined in Section I; (iii) the Capitalized Interest Credit described in Paragraph 12 of Section I shall be $0; and (iv) any payments of the Special Tax Buydown (less Administrative Fees and Expenses) shall be disbursed pursuant to the Fiscal Agent Agreement. The Special Tax Buydown computed under step 5 shall be billed directly to the property owner of each Assessor's Parcel identified in the request for Letter of Compliance and shall be due within 30 days of the billing date. If the Special Tax Buydown is not paid within 45 days of the billing date, a delinquent penalty of 10 percent shall be added to the Special Tax Buydown. Upon receipt of the Special Tax Buydown payment, the CFD Administrator shall issue a Letter of Compliance and a Certificate of Satisfaction of Special Tax Buydown for the subject property, and such subject property shall no longer be subject to the terms of the Special Tax Buydown. 4. Costs and Expenses Related to Implementation of Special Tax Buydown The property owner of each Assessor's Parcel identified in the request for Letter of Compliance shall pay all costs of the CFD Administrator or other consultants required to review the application for building permits, calculate the Special Tax Buydown, issue Letters of Compliance or any other actions required under Section D. Such payments shall be due 30 days after receipt of invoice by such property owner. A deposit may be required by the CFD Administrator prior to undertaking work related to the Special Tax Buydown. P688 B. METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT OF THE SPECIAL TAX Commencing with Fiscal Yeaz 2006-07 and for each following Fiscal Yeaz, the Council shall determine the Special Tax Requirement and shall levy the Special Tax until the total Special Tax levy equals the Special Tax Requirement. The Special Tax shall be levied each Fiscal Yeaz as follows: First: The Special Tax shall be levied on each Assessor's Parcel of Developed Property in an amount equal to 100% of the applicable Maximum Special Tax; Second: If additional monies are needed to satisfy the Special Tax Requirement after the first step has been completed, the Special Tax shall be levied Proportionately on each Assessor's Parcel of Undeveloped Property at up to 100% of the Maximum Special Tax for Undeveloped Property; Third: If additional monies are needed to satisfy the Special Tax Requirement after the first two steps have been completed, then the Special Tax shall be levied Proportionately on each Assessor's Pazce] of Taxable Public Property and Taxable Property Owner Association Property at up to the Maximum Special Tax for Taxable Public Property and Taxable Property Owner Association Property; Notwithstanding the above the Council may, in any Fiscal Yeaz, levy Proportionately less than 100% of the Maximum Special Tax in step one (above), when (i) the Council is no longer required to levy the Special Tax pursuant to steps two and three above in order to meet the Special Tax Requirement; and (ii) all authorized CFD No. 2006-O1 Bonds have already been issued or the Council has covenanted that it will not issue any additional CFD No. 2006-O1 Bonds (except refunding bonds) to be supported by the Special Tax. Further notwithstanding the above, under no circumstances will the Special Tax levied against any Assessor's Parcel of Residential Property for which an occupancy permit for private residential use has been issued be increased by more than ten percent as a consequence of delinquency or default by the owner of any other Assessor's Parcel within CFD No. 2006-01. C. No Special Tax shall be levied on up to 11.0 Acres of Public Property and/or Property Owner Association Property. Tax-exempt status will be assigned by the CFD Administrator in the chronological order in which property becomes Public Property or Property Owner Association Property. However, should an Assessor's Parce] no longer be classified as Public Property or Property Owner Association Property, its tax-exempt status will be revoked. Public Property or Property Owner Association Property that is not exempt from the Special Tax under this section shall be subject to the levy of the Special Tax and shall P689 be taxed Proportionately as part of the third step in Section E above, at up to 100% of the applicable Maximum Special Tax for Taxable Public Property and Taxable Property Owner Association Property. D. APPEALS AND INTERPRETATIONS Any landowner or resident who feels that the amount of the Special Tax levied on their Assessor's Pazcel is in error may submit a written appeal to CFD No. 2006-O1. The CFD Administrator shall review the appeal and if the CFD Administrator concurs, the amount of the Special Tax levied shall be appropriately modified through an adjustment to the Special Tax levy in the following Fiscal Yeaz. No refunds shall be given in the current Fiscal Year. The Council may interpret this Rate and Method of Apportionment for purposes of clarifying any ambiguity and make determinations relative to the annual administration of the Special Tax and any landowner or resident appeals. Any decision of the Council shall be final and binding as to all persons. E. MANNER OF COLLECTION The Special Tax will be collected in the same manner and at the same time as ordinary ad valorem property taxes; provided, however, that CFD No. 2006-O1 may directly bill the Special Tax, may collect Special Taxes at a different time or in a different manner if necessary to meet its financial obligations, and may covenant to foreclose and may actually foreclose on delinquent Assessor's Pazcels as permitted by the Act. F. PREPAYMENT OF SPECIAL TAX The following additional definition applies to this Section F: "Previously Issued Bouds" means, for any Fiscal Year, all Outstanding Bonds that are deemed to be outstanding under the Fiscal Agent Agreement after the first interest and/or principal payment date following the current Fiscal Yeaz. Only an Assessor's Parcel of Developed Property, or Undeveloped Property for which a building permit has been issued, may be prepaid. The Special Tax obligation applicable to an Assessor's Pazcel in CFD No. 2006-01 may only be prepaid after all authorized CFD No. 2006-O1 Bonds have already been issued, or after the Council has covenanted that it will not issue any additional CFD No. 2006-O1 Bonds (except refunding bonds) to be supported by Special Taxes levied under this Rate and Method of Apportionment. The obligation of the Assessor's Pazcel to pay any Special Tax may be permanently satisfied as described herein, provided that a prepayment maybe made with respect to a particulaz Assessor's Parcel only if there are no delinquent Special Taxes with respect to such Assessor's Parcel at the time of prepayment. An owner of an Assessor's Parcel intending to prepay the Special Tax obligation shall provide the CFD Administrator with written notice of intent to prepay. Within 30 P690 days of receipt of such written notice, the CFD Administrator shall notify such owner of the prepayment amount of such Assessor's Pazcel. Prepayment must be made not less than 45 days prior to any redemption date for the CFD No. 2006-01 Bonds to be redeemed with the proceeds of such prepaid Special Taxes. The Special Tax Prepayment Amount (defined below) shall be calculated as summarized below (capitalized terms as defined below): Bondl plus plus plus less less Total: equals :edemption Amount Redemption Premium Defeasance Amount Administrative Fees and Expenses Reserve Fund Credit Canitalized Interest Credit Special Tax Prepayment Amount As of the proposed date of prepayment, the Special Tax Prepayment Amount shall be calculated as follows: Confirm that no Special Tax delinquencies apply to such Assessor's Parcel. 2. For Assessor's Parcels of Developed Property, compute the Maximum Special Tax for the Assessor's Pazcel to be prepaid. For Assessor's Parcels of Undeveloped Property for which building permits have already been issued, compute the Maximum Special Tax for the Assessor's Parcel to be prepaid as though it were already designated as Developed Property, based upon the building permit which has been issued for that Assessor's Pazcel. 3. Divide the Maximum Special. Tax computed pursuant to pazagraph 2 by the estimated Maximum Special Taxes for CFD No. 2006-O1 based on the Developed Property Special Taxes which could be charged in the current Fiscal Year on all expected development in CFD No. 2006- 01 (as reasonably determined by the CFD Administrator), excluding any Assessor's Parcels which have been prepaid; and 4. Multiply the quotient computed pursuant to paragraph 3 by the Previously Issued Bonds to compute the amount of Previously Issued Bonds to be retired and prepaid (the "Bond Redemption Amount"). 5. Multiply the Bond Redemption Amount computed pursuant to paragraph 4 by the applicable redemption premium (e.g., the redemption price - 100%), if any, on the Previously Issued Bonds to be redeemed (the "Redemption Premium"). 6. Compute the amount needed to pay interest on the Bond Redemption Amount from the first bond interest and/or principal payment date not P691 covered by the current Fiscal Year Special Taxes until the eazliest redemption date for the Previously Issued Bonds. 7. Determine the Special Taxes levied on the Assessor's Parcel in the cunent Fiscal Year that have not yet been paid. 8. Compute the minimum amount the CFD Administrator reasonably expects to derive from the reinvestment of the Special Tax Prepayment Amount less the Administrative Fees and Expenses (defined below) from the date of prepayment until the redemption date for the Previously Issued Bonds to be redeemed with the prepayment. 9. Add the amounts computed pursuant to pazagraphs 6 and 7 and subtract the amount computed pursuant to paragraph 8 (the "Defeasance Amount'. 10. The administrative fees and expenses of CFD No. 2006-O1 aze as calculated by the CFD Administrator and include the costs of computation of the prepayment, the costs to invest the prepayment proceeds, the costs of redeeming CFD No. 2006-01 Bonds, and the costs of recording any notices to evidence the prepayment and the redemption (the "Administrative Fees and Expenses"). 11. The reserve fund credit (the "Reserve Fund Credit") shall equal the lesser o£ (a) the expected reduction in the reserve requirement (as defined in the Fiscal Agent Agreement), if any, associated with the redemption of Previously Issued Bonds as a result of the prepayment, or (b) the amount derived by subtracting the new reserve requirement (as defined in the Fiscal Agent Agreement) in effect after the redemption of Previously Issued Bonds as a result of the prepayment from the balance in the reserve fund on the prepayment date, but in no event shall such amount be less than zero. No Reserve Fund Credit shall be granted if the amount then on deposit in the reserve fund for the Previously Issued Bonds is below 100% of the reserve requirement (as defined in the Fiscal Agent Agreement). 12. If any capitalized interest for the Previously Issued Bonds will not have been expended as of the date immediately following the first bond interest and/or principal payment date following the current Fiscal Year, a capitalized interest credit shall be calculated by multiplying the quotient computed pursuant to pazagraph 3 by the expected balance in the capitalized interest fund after such first interest and/or principal payment (the "Capitalized Interest Credit"). 13. The Special Tax prepayment is equal to the sum of the amounts computed pursuant to paragraphs 4, 5, 9, and 10, less the amounts P692 computed pursuant to paragraphs 11 and 12 (the "Special Taz Prepayment Amount"). From the Special Tax Prepayment Amount, the amounts computed pursuant to pazagaphs 4, 5, 9, 10, 11 and 12 shall be deposited into the appropriate fund as established under the Fiscal Agent Agreement and be used to redeem Previously Issued Bonds, as applicable, or make scheduled debt service payments or to pay administrative expenses related to the prepayment of the Special Tax. The Special Tax Prepayment Amount may be insufficient to redeem a full $5,000 increment of CFD No. 2006-O1 Bonds. In such cases, the increment above $5,000 or integal multiple thereof will be retained in the appropriate fund established under the Fiscal Agent Ageement to be used with the next prepayment of CFD No. 2006-01 Bonds or to make scheduled debt service payments on such bonds. Upon confirmation of the payment of the current Fiscal Year's Special Tax lery as determined under pazagaph 7 (above), the CFD Administrator shall remove the current Fiscal Year's Special Tax levy for such Assessor's Pazcel from the County tax rolls. With respect to any Assessor's Pazcel for which the Special Tax obligation is prepaid in accordance with this Section I, the Council shall cause a suitable notice to be recorded in compliance with the Act, to indicate the prepayment of Special Taxes and the release of the Special Tax lien on such Assessor's Pazcel, and the obligation of such Assessor's Parcel to pay the Special Tax shall cease. Notwithstanding the foregoing, no Special Tax prepayment shall be allowed unless, at the time of such proposed prepayment, the amount of Maximum Special Taxes that maybe levied on Taxable Property within CFD No. 2006-O1 (after excluding 11.0 Acres of Public Property and Property Owner Association Property as set forth in Section F) both prior to and after the proposed prepayment is at least equal to the sum of (i) the Administrative Expenses, as defined in Section A above, and (ii) 1.10 times the maximum annual debt service on all Outstanding Bonds. G. TERM OF SPECIAL TAX The Special Tax shall be levied for a period not to exceed fifty yeazs commencing with Fiscal Year 2006-07, provided however that Special Taxes will cease to be levied in an eazlier Fiscal Yeaz if the CFD Administrator has determined (i) that all required interest and principal payments on the CFD No. 2006-01 Bonds have been paid; and (ii) all Authorized Facilities have been constructed. P693 N ~_ ,O ~ ~ W ~ O N (O 0 .E o N J o LL ~ Q C U U c .~ o ~ ~' yvwr, y J y r~ c •_ ~ N Q ; ._.._.._.._ D: y ' ~' _ .~ ~ ~ m ~ w t 3 ~ ~ 0 0 ~ m ~~ lL Q V 1 _.._.. ~ i^b'3se3 ffi i ® ~ v w i ny epuennp3 ny epuenng3 '~ i ~ i ~'. ~8 ~~J~ e4 •_o_o_.._v___o_..' 0 ny Ja~sayooa. ny Ja3sayooa U .-.. ny ua~!II!W r._.._.._.._.. ny ua~!II!W i i i i ny uaneH ~ ny uaneH i ny esowJaH . ny esowJaH i ny Pleq!yoJy ~ ^d Pleq!4oJV i ny uewllaH nyuewllaH! ~,. ~ t ~ ~ t v i ~ ny p e~(au!~ 3S ue!lawe~ ~ ~~ a~ t~ E~~a ~~ ~ M~.s.._• _ s g2~~1~jfi~ •~•~ (n c CO O' In y ~ y •-•y •~• s J 3 r ~ae@;ilg ~ m li ¢ 4~j F~~~~~;~~ 4' C Ee (6 N ~N s~ _ ~~~~;g~F~~~~ P694 *2~ T H E C I T Y O F RANCHO CUCAMONGA StaffReport DATE: June 3, 2009 TO: Mayor and Members of City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager ~~=j FROM: John R. Gillison, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Servic` '`~ BY: Ingrid Y. Bruce, GIS/Special Districts Manager SCIBJECT: APPROVAL TO SET ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT N0.2006-02 (AMADOR ON ROUTE 66) WITH NO INCREASE TO THE CURRENT RATE. It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached Resolution setting the annual special tax for Community Facilities District No. 2006-02 (Amador on Route 66). Pursuant to Section 53340 and 53358 of the Government Code Mello-Roos Community Facilities District Act of 1982, the City Council is authorized to annually levy the tax rate to pay debt service on the bonds. There is no increase from the current tax rate for fiscal yeaz 2009/2010. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS On October 18, 2006, an election was held and the property owners within the boundary of Community Facilities District No. 2006-02 authorized the District to incur bonded indebtedness in the principal amount of $2,980,000. On November 1, 2006, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 770 approving the levy of the special tax, and on December 20, 2006 approved Resolution No. 06-402 authorizing the issuance of bonds. The District boundary is located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard and east of Etiwanda Avenue and west of East Avenue. Bonds were issued on January 25, 2007 to share in the provision of funds for the acquisition of street improvements, landscape improvements within the public right-of--way, and water and sewer improvements. This special tax shall be levied only so long as required for each parcel of taxable property to discharge bond obligations through the life of the bonds. P695 Page 2 June 3, 2009 City Council Staff Report CFD 2006-02 (Amador on Route 66) Attachments: Resolution Exhibit "A" Map RESOLUTION NO. ~ q--~Z~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RE-ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 2006-02 (AMADOR ON ROUTE 66) FOR FISCAL YEAR 2009-2010 Recitals WHEREAS, by its Resolution No. 06-327, adopted on October 18, 2006, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California (the "City Council"), pursuant to the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982 (Section 53311 and following of the California Government Code) (the "Act") established City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Facilities District No. 2006-02 (the "District'; and WHEREAS, at an election held on October 18, 2006, the qualified electors unanimously approved the levy of a special tax (the "Special Tax"); and WHEREAS, by its Ordinance No. 770 (the "Ordinance"), adopted on November 1, 2006 the City Council authorized the levy of the Special Tax in accordance with the Act; and WHEREAS, on January 25, 2007, the District delivered its $2,980,000 City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Facilities District No. 2006-01 Special Tax Bonds (the "Bonds"); and WHEREAS, in a Fiscal Agent Agreement dated as of January Ol, 2007 by and between the City and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (the "Fiscal Agent"), the City covenanted to fix and levy the Special Tax for each fiscal year in an amount required for the payment of principal and interest on the Bonds becoming due and payable during that fiscal yeaz, plus administrative expenses, but taking into account certain balances in funds held by the Fiscal Agent (the "Covenant"); and WHEREAS, principal and interest will become due and payable on the Bonds during Fiscal Yeaz 2009-2010 in an amount exceeding funds held by the Fiscal Agent and designated for the payment for such principal interest; and WHEREAS, the City Council intends to levy the Special Tax for Fiscal Yeaz 2009-2010 as authorized by the Ordinance and required by the Covenant; and WHEREAS, the City Council intends to provide for the collection of such Special Tax for Fiscal Year 2009-2010 by City staff. NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I : That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2: That the specific rate and amount of the Special Tax to be collected to pay for the costs and expenses for Fiscal Yeaz 2009-2010 for the District is hereby determined and established as set forth Exhibit "A" to this Resolution, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference P696 P697 SECTION 3: That the rate as set forth above does not exceed the amount as previously authorized by Ordinance of this legislative body, and is not in excess of that as previously approved by the qualified electors of the District. SECTION 4: That the proceeds of the Special Tax shall be used to pay, in whole or in part, the costs of the following, in the following order of priority: A. Payment of principal and interest on any outstanding authorized bonded indebtedness; B. Necessary replenishment of bond reserve funds or other reserve funds; C. Payment of costs and expenses of authorized public facilities and public services, and incidental expenses pursuant to the Act; and D. Repayment of advances and loans, if appropriate. The proceeds of the special taxes shall be used as set forth above, and shall not be used for any other purpose. SECTION 5: The special tax shall be collected in the same manner as ordinary ad valorem property taxes aze collected, and shall be subject to the same penalties and same procedure and sale in cases of any delinquency for ad valorem taxes, and the Tax Collector is hereby authorized to deduct reasonable administrative costs incurred in collecting any said special tax. SECTION 6: All monies collected pursuant to this Resolution shall be paid into the Community Facilities District funds, including any bond fund and reserve fund. SECTION 7: The Auditor of the County is hereby directed to enter in the next county assessment roll on which taxes will become due, opposite each lot or pazcel of land effected in a space marked "public improvements, special tax", or by any other suitable designation, the installment of the special tax, and for the exact rate and amount of said tax, reference is made to the attached Exhibit "A". SECTION 8: The County Auditor shall then, at the close of the tax collection period, promptly render to this Agency a detailed report showing the amount and/or amounts of such special tax installments, interest, penalties and percentages so collected and from what property collected, and also provide a statement of any percentages retained for the expense of making any such collection. P698 PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of June 2009. Donald J. Kurth, M.D., Mayor ATTEST: Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk I, JANICE C. REYNOLDS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a regulaz meeting of said City Council held on the day of June 2009. Executed this day of June 2009, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk P699 Resolution No. Page CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO.2006-02 (AMADOR ON ROUTE 66) EXHIBIT "A" The Resolution establishing the annual special tax refers to this Exhibit for an explanation of the rate and method of apportionment of the Special Taxes for Fiscal Yeaz 2009/2010. CLASSIFICATION OF PARCELS Each Fiscal Year, all Taxable Property within CFD No. 2006-02 shall be classified as Developed Property or Undeveloped Property, and shall be subject to the levy of Special Taxes in accordance with the rate and method of apportionment determined pursuant to the sections below. MAXIMUM SPECIAL TAX RATE The Maximum Special Tax for each Assessor's Pazcel of Residential Property shall be based on the Residential Floor Area of the dwelling unit(s) located on such Assessor's Pazcel. The Maximum Special Tax for each Assessor's Parcel of Non-Residential Property shall be based on the Acreage of such Assessor's Pazcel. The Maximum Special Tax for any Assessor's Pazcel of Developed Property containing more than one Land Use Class shall be determined is as follows: MAXIMUM SPECIAL TAX Developed Property (a) Maximum Snecial Tax The Maximum Special Tax for each Assessor's Pazcel classified as Developed Property is shown below in Table 1. P700 TABLE 1 Maximum Special Tax for Developed Property in Community Facilities District No. 2006-02 Land Use Class Description Residential Floor Area Maximum Special Tax 1 Residential Property More than 1,850 SF $2,816 per unit 2 Residential Property 1,601 -1,850 SF $2,697 per unit 3 Residential Property 1,351-1,600 SF $2,469 per unit 4 Residential Property Less than 1,351 SF $2,241 per unit 5 Non-Residential Property NA $64,747 per Acre (b) Multiple Land Use Classes In some instances an Assessor's Pazcel of Developed Property may contain more than one Land Use Class. The Maximum Special Tax levied on such an Assessor's Pazcel shall be the sum of the Maximum Special Taxes for all Land Use Classes located on that Assessor's Pazcel. For an Assessor's Parcel that contains both Residential Property and Non-Residential Property, the Acreage of such Assessor's Parcel shall be allocated to each type of property based on the amount of Acreage, or equivalent entitlement, designated for each land use as determined by reference to the site plan approved by the City for such Assessor's Pazcel. The CFD Administrator's allocation to each type of property shall be fmal. 2. Undeveloped Property, Taxable Public Property, and Taxable Property Owner Association Property (a) Maximum Special Tax The Maximum Special Tax fot Undeveloped Property, Taxable Public Property, and Taxable Property Owner Association Property shall be $71,889 per Acre. A. SPECIAL TAX BUYDOWN All of the requirements of this Section A, which describes the need for a Special Tax Buydown that may result from a change in development as determined pursuant to this Section A, shall only apply after the issuance of the first series of CFD No. 2006- P701 02 Bonds. Prior to the issuance of the first series of CFD No. 2006-02 Bonds, the terms of the Special Tax Buydown shall not apply. The following additional definitions apply to this Section A: "Certificate of Satisfaction of Special Tax Buydown" means a certificate from the CFD Administrator stating that the property described in such certificate has met the Special Tax Buydown Requirement for such property as calculated under this Section A. "Letter of Compliance" means a letter from the CFD Administrator allowing the issuance of building permits based on the prior submittal of a request for Letter of Compliance by a property owner. "Special Tax Buydown Requirement" means the total amount of Special Tax Buydown necessary to be prepaid in order to permit the issuance of building permits listed in a request for Letter of Compliance, as calculated under this Section A. "Update Property" means an Assessor's Pazcel of Undeveloped Property for which a building permit has been issued. For purposes of all calculations in this Section A, Update Property shall be taxed as if it were already Developed Property during the current Fiscal Yeaz. 1. Request for Letter of Compliance After the issuance of the first series of CFD No. 2006-02 Bonds, a property owner shall, as a precondition to the issuance of a building permit for construction of any residential and/or non-residential development for a specific Assessor's Pazcel or lot, submit a Letter of Compliance for the construction of the development on such Assessor's Parcel or lot. If a Letter of Compliance has not yet been issued, the property owner must first request a Letter of Compliance from the CFD Administrator. The request from the property owner shall contain a list of all building permits for which the property owner is requesting a Letter of Compliance, which may exceed the number of building permit issuances being applied for at that time. The property owner shall also submit the Assessor's Pazcels or tract and lot numbers on which the construction is to take place, and the Residential Floor Area (for each residential dwelling unit) or the Acreage (for each non-residential pazcel) associated with each prospective building permit. 2. Issuance of Letter of Compliance Upon the receipt of a request for a Letter of Compliance, the CFD Administrator shall assign each building permit identified in such request to Land Use Classes 1 through 5 as listed in Table 2 below based on the type of use and, if applicable, the Residential Floor Area identified for each such building permit. If the CFD Administrator determines (i) that the number of building permits requested for each Land Use Class, P702 plus those building permits previously issued for each Land Use Class, will not cause the total number of residential dwelling units or non-residential Acreage within any such Land Use Class to exceed the number of residential dwelling units or Acreage for such Land Use Class identified in Table 2 below, and (ii) that the total number of residential dwelling units anticipated to be constructed pursuant to the current development plan for CFD No. 2006-02 shall not be less than 99 and the amount of non-residential Acreage will not be more than 0.0 Acres, then a Letter of Compliance shall be submitted to the City and/or property owner by the CFD Administrator approving the issuance of the requested building permits for the subject property, and such subject property shall no longer be subject to the terms of the Special Tax Buydown. This Letter of Compliance shall be submitted to the City and/or property owner by the CFD Administrator within ten days of the submittal of the request for Letter of Compliance by the property owner. However, should (i) the building permits requested, plus those previously issued, cause the total number of residential dwelling units or non-residential Acreage within any such Land Use Class to exceed the number of residential dwelling units or non-residential Acreage for such Land Use Class identified in Table 2 below, or (ii) the CFD Administrator determine that changes in the development plan may cause a decrease in the number of residential dwelling units within CFD No. 2006-02 to below 99 residential dwelling units or an increase in the amount ofnon-residential Acreage to above 0.0 Acres, then a Letter of Compliance will not be issued and the CFD Administrator will be directed to determine if a Special Tax Buydown shall be required. The number of residential dwelling units and non-residential Acreage, as listed in Table 2 below, may be updated by the CFD Administrator prior to the issuance of the first series of CFD No. 2006-02 Bonds. TABLE 2 Expected Residential Dwelling Units per Land Use Class and Non-Residential Acreage Community Facilities District No. 2006-02 Land Use Class Description Residential Floor Area Number of Units/Acres 1 Residential Property More than 1,850 SF 33 units 2 Residential Property 1,601 -1,850 SF 33 units 3 Residential Property 1,351 -1,600 SF 0 units q Residential Property Less than 1,351 SF 33 units 5 Non-Residential Property NA 0.00 Acres P703 3. Calculation of Special Tax Buydown If a Special Tax Buydown calculation is required as determined by the CFD Administrator pursuant to pazagraph 2 above, the CFD Administrator shall review the current development plan for CFD No. 2006-02 in consultation with the current property owners for all remaining Undeveloped Property in CFD No. 2006-02, and shall prepare an updated version of Table 2 identifying the revised number of residential dwelling units or non-residential Acreage anticipated within each Land Use Class. The CFD Administrator shall not be responsible for any delays in preparing the updated Table 2 that result from a refusal on the part of one or more cun•ent property owners of Undeveloped Property to provide information on their future development. The CFD Administrator shall then review the updated Table 2 and determine the Special Tax Buydown Requirement, if any, to be applied to the property identified in the request for Letter of Compliance to assure the CFD's ability to levy special taxes equal to 110% debt service coverage on the Outstanding Bonds, plus Administrative Expenses. The calculations shall be undertaken by the CFD Administrator, based on the data in the updated Table 2, as follows: Step 1. Compute the sum of the Maximum Special Tax authorized to be levied on all Developed Property and Update Property within CFD No. 2006- 02, plus the sum of the Maximum Special Tax authorized to be levied on all future development as identified in the current development plan as determined by the CFD Administrator in consultation with the property owner(s). Step 2. Determine the amount of Special Tax required to provide 110% debt service coverage on the Outstanding Bonds, plus any other payments included in the Special Tax Requirement. Step 3. If the total sum computed pursuant to step 1 is greater than or equal to the amount computed pursuant to step 2, then no Special Tax Buydown will be required and a Letter of Compliance shall immediately be issued by the CFD Administrator for all of the building permits currently being requested. If the total sum computed pursuant to step 1 is less than the amount computed pursuant [o step 2, then continue to step 4. Step 4. Determine the Maximum Special Tax shortfall by subtracting the total sum computed pursuant to step 1 from the amount computed pursuant to step 2. Divide this Maximum Special Tax shortfall by the amount computed pursuant to step 2. P704 Step 5. The Special Tax Buydown Requirement shall be calculated using the prepayment formula described in Section A, with the following exceptions: (i) skip Pazagraphs 1, 2 and 3, and begin with Paragraph 4; (ii) the Bond Redemption Amount in Pazagraph 4 of the prepayment formula described in Section I shall equal the product of the quotient computed pursuant to step 4 above times the Previously Issued Bonds, as defined in Section I; (iii) the Capitalized Interest Credit described in Pazagraph 12 of Section I shall be $0; and (iv) any payments of the Special Tax Buydown (less Administrative Fees and Expenses) shall be disbursed pursuant to the Fiscal Agent Agreement. The Special Tax Buydown computed under step 5 shall be billed directly to the property owner of each Assessor's Pazcel identified in the request for Letter of Compliance and shall be due within 30 days of the billing date. If the Special Tax Buydown is not paid within 45 days of the billing date, a delinquent penalty of 10 percent shall be added to the Special Tax Buydown. Upon receipt of the Special Tax Buydown payment, the CFD Administrator shall issue a Letter of Compliance and a Certificate of Satisfaction of Special Tax Buydown for the subject property and such subject property shall no longer be subject to the terms of the Special Tax Buydown. 4. Costs and Expenses Related to Implementation of Special Tax Buydown The property owner of each Assessor's Pazcel identified in the request for Letter of Compliance shall pay all costs of the CFD Administrator or other consultants required to review the application for building permits, calculate the Special Tax Buydown, issue Letters of Compliance or any other actions required under Section A. Such payments shall be due 30 days after receipt of invoice by such property owner. A deposit may be required by the CFD Administrator prior to undertaking work related to the Special Tax Buydown. B. METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT OF THE SPECIAL TAX Commencing with Fiscal Year 2006-07 and for each following Fiscal Year, the Council shall determine the Special Tax Requirement and shall levy the Special Tax until the total Special Tax levy equals the Special Tax Requirement. The Special Tax shall be levied each Fiscal Yeaz as follows: First: The Special Tax shall be levied on each Assessor's Pazcel of Developed Property in an amount equal to 100% of the applicable Maximum Special Tax; Second: If additional monies aze needed to satisfy the Special Tax Requirement after the first step has been completed, the Special Tax shall be levied Proportionately on each Assessor's Parcel of Undeveloped Property at up to 100% of the Maximum Special Tax for Undeveloped Property; P705 Third: If additional monies are needed to satisfy the Special Tax Requirement after the first two steps have been completed, then the Special Tax shall be levied Proportionately on each Assessor's Parcel of Taxable Public Property and Taxable Property Owner Association Property at up to the Maximum Special Tax for Taxable Public Property and Taxable Property Owner Association Property; Notwithstanding the above the Council may, in any Fiscal Yeaz, levy Proportionately less than 100% of the Maximum Special Tax in step one (above), when (i) the Council is no longer required to levy the Special Tax pursuant to steps two and three above in order to meet the Special Tax Requirement; and (ii) all authorized CFD No. 2006-02 Bonds have akeady been issued or the Council has covenanted that it will not issue any additional CFD No. 2006-02 Bonds (except refunding bonds) to be supported by the Special Tax. Further notwithstanding the above, under no circumstances will the Special Tax levied against any Assessor's Parcel of Residential Property for which an occupancy permit for private residential use has been issued be increased by more than ten percent as a consequence of delinquency or default by the owner of any other Assessor's Parcel within CFD No. 2006-02. C. No Special Tax shall be levied on up to 6.0 Acres of Public Property and/or Property Owner Association Property. Tax-exempt status will be assigned by the CFD Administrator in the chronological order in which property becomes Public Property or Property Owner Association Property. However, should an Assessor's Parcel no longer be classified as Public Property or Property Owner Association Property, its tax-exempt status will be revoked. Public Property or Property Owner Association Property that is not exempt from the Special-Tax under this section shall be subject to the levy of the Special Tax and shall be taxed Proportionately as part of the third step in Section E above, at up to 100% of the applicable Maximum Special Tax for Taxable Public Property and Taxable Property Owner Association Property. D. APPEALS AND INTERPRETATIONS Any landowner or resident who feels that the amount of the Special Tax levied on their Assessor's Pazcel is in error may submit a written appeal to CFD No. 2006-02. The CFD Administrator shall review the appeal and if the CFD Administrator concurs, the amount of the Special Tax levied shall be appropriately modified through an adjustment to the Special Tax levy in the following Fiscal Year. No refunds shall be given in the current Fiscal Yeaz. The Council may interpret this Rate and Method of Apportionment for purposes of clarifying any ambiguity and make determinations relative to the annual P706 administration of the Special Tax and any landowner or resident appeals. Any decision of the Council shall be final and binding as to all persons. E. MANNER OF COLLECTION The Special Tax will be collected in the same manner and at the same time as ordinary ad valorem property taxes; provided, however, that CFD No. 2006-02 may directly bill the Special Tax,' may collect Special Taxes at a' different time or in a different manner if necessary to meet its financial obligations, and may covenant to foreclose and may actually foreclose on delinquent Assessor's Parcels as permitted by the Act. F. PREPAYMENT OF SPECIAL TAX The following additional definition applies to this Section F: "Previously Issued Bonds" means, for any Fiscal Year, all Outstanding Bonds that are deemed to be outstanding under the Fiscal Agent Agreement after the first interest and/or principal payment date following the current Fiscal Yeaz. Only an Assessor's Pazcel of Developed Property, or Undeveloped Property for which a building permit has been issued, may be prepaid. The Special Tax obligation applicable to an Assessor's Pazcel in CFD No. 2006-02 may only be prepaid after all authorized CFD No. 2006-02 Bonds have akeady been issued, or after the Council has covenanted that it will not issue any additional CFD No. 2006-02 Bonds (except refunding bonds) to be supported by Special Taxes levied under this Rate and Method of Apportionment. The obligation of the Assessor's Pazcel to pay any Special Tax may be permanently satisfied as described herein, provided that a prepayment maybe made with respect to a particulaz Assessor's Parcel only if there aze no delinquent Special Taxes with respect to such Assessor's Pazcel at the time of prepayment. An owner of an Assessor's Pazcel intending to prepay the Special Tax obligation shall provide the CFD Administrator with written notice of intent to prepay. Within 30 days of receipt of such written notice, the CFD Administrator shall notify such owner of the prepayment amount of such Assessor's Parcel. Prepayment must be made not less than 45 days prior to any redemption date for the CFD No. 2006-02 Bonds to be redeemed with the proceeds of such prepaid Special Taxes. The Special Tax Prepayment Amount (defined below) shall be calculated as summarized below (capitalized terms as defined below): Bond I plus plus plus less less Total: equals :edemption Amount Redemption Premium Defeasance Amount Administrative Fees and Expenses Reserve Fund Credit Capitalized Interest Credit Special Tax Prepayment Amount P707 As of the proposed date of prepayment, the Special Tax Prepayment Amount shall be calculated as follows: 1. Confirm that no Special Tax delinquencies apply to such Assessor's Pazcel. 2. For Assessor's Pazcels of Developed Property, compute the Maximum Special Tax for the Assessor's Pazcel to be prepaid. For Assessor's Pazcels of Undeveloped Property for which building permits have already been issued, compute the Maximum Special Tax for the Assessor's Parcel to be prepaid as though it were already designated as Developed Property, based upon the building permit which has been issued for that Assessor's Parcel. 3. Divide the Maximum Special Tax computed pursuant to pazagraph 2 by the estimated Maximum Special Taxes for CFD No. 2006-02 based on the Developed Property Special Taxes which could be charged in the current Fiscal Yeaz on all expected development in CFD No. 2006- 02 (as reasonably determined by the CFD Administrator), excluding any Assessor's Pazcels which have been prepaid; and 4. Multiply the quotient computed pursuant to pazagraph 3 by the Previously Issued Bonds to compute the amount of Previously Issued Bonds to be retired and prepaid (the "Bond Redemption Amount"). 5. Multiply the Bond Redemption Amount computed pursuant to pazagraph 4 by the applicable redemption premium (e.g., the redemption price - 100%), if any, on the Previously Issued Bonds to be redeemed (the "Redemption Premium"). 6. Compute the amount needed to pay interest on the Bond Redemption Amount from the first bond interest and/or principal payment date not covered by the current Fiscal Yeaz Special Taxes until the earliest redemption date for the Previously Issued Bonds. 7. Determine the Special Taxes levied on the Assessor's Pazcel in the current Fiscal Year that have not yet been paid. 8. Compute the minimum amount the CFD Administrator reasonably expects to derive from the reinvestment of the Special Tax Prepayment Amount less the Administrative Fees and Expenses (defined below) from the date of prepayment until the redemption date for the Previously Issued Bonds to be redeemed with the prepayment. 9. Add the amounts computed pursuant to paragraphs 6 and 7 and subtract the amount computed pursuant to pazagraph 8 (the "Defeasance Amount'. P708 10. The administrative fees and expenses of CFD No. 2006-02 are as calculated by the CFD Administrator and include the costs of computation of the prepayment, the costs to invest the prepayment proceeds, the costs of redeeming CFD No. 2006-02 Bonds, and the costs of recording any notices to evidence the prepayment and the redemption (the "Administrative Fees and Expenses"). 11. The reserve fund credit (the "Reserve Fund Credit") shall equal the lesser of: (a) the expected reduction in the reserve requirement (as defined in the Fiscal Agent Agreement), if any, associated with the redemption of Previously Issued Bonds as a result of the prepayment, or (b) the amount derived by subtracting the new reserve requirement (as defined in the Fiscal Agent Agreement) in effect after the redemption of Previously Issued Bonds as a result of the pr~ayment from the balance in the reserve fund on the prepayment date, but in no event shall such amount be less than zero. No Reserve Fund Credit shall be granted if the amount then on deposit in the reserve fund for the Previously Issued Bonds is below 100% of the reserve requirement (as defined in the Fiscal Agent Agreement). 12. If any capitalized interest for the Previously Issued Bonds will not have been expended as of the date immediately following the first bond interest and/or principal payment date following the current Fiscal Yeaz, a capitalized interest credit shall be calculated by multiplying the quotient computed pursuant to pazagraph 3 by the expected balance in the capitalized interest fund after such first interest and/or principal payment (the "Capitalized Interest Credit"). 13. The Special Tax prepayment is equal to the sum of the amounts computed pursuant to pazagraphs 4, 5, 9, and 10, less the amounts computed pursuant to paragraphs 11 and 12 (the "Special Tax Prepayment Amount"). From the Special Tax Prepayment Amount, the amounts computed pursuant to pazagraphs 4, 5, 9, 10, 11 and 12 shall be deposited into the appropriate fund as established under the Fiscal Agent Agreement and be used to redeem Previously Issued Bonds, as applicable, or make scheduled debt service payments or to pay administrative expenses related to the prepayment of the Special Tax. The Special Tax Prepayment Amount may be insufficient to redeem a full $5,000 increment of CFD No. 2006-02 Bonds. In such cases, the increment above $5,000 or integal multiple thereof will be retained in the appropriate fund established under the Fiscal Agent Agreement to be used with the next prepayment of CFD No. 2006-02 Bonds or to make scheduled debt service payments on such bonds. Upon confirmation of the payment of the current Fiscal Yeaz's Special Tax levy as determined under pazagraph 7 (above), the CFD Administrator shall remove the P709 current Fiscal Year's Special Tax levy for such Assessor's Parcel from the County tax rolls. With respect to any Assessor's Pazcel for which the Special Tax obligation is prepaid in accordance with this Section I, the Council shall cause a suitable notice to be recorded in compliance with the Act, to indicate the prepayment of Special Taxes and the release of the Special Tax lien on such Assessor's Pazcel, and the obligation of such Assessor's Parcel to pay the Special Tax shall cease. Notwithstanding the foregoing, no Special Tax prepayment shall be allowed unless, at the time of such proposed prepayment, the amount of Maximum Special Taxes that maybe levied on Taxable Property within CFD No. 2006-02 (after excluding 6.0 Acres of Public Property and Property Owner Association Property as set forth in Section F) both prior to and after the proposed prepayment is at least equal to the sum of (i) the Administrative Expenses, as defined in Section A above, and (ii) 1.10 times the maximum annual debt service on all Outstanding Bonds. G. TERM OF SPECIAL TAX The Special Tax shall be levied for a period not to exceed fifty years commencing with Fiscal Year 2006-07, provided however that Special Taxes will cease to be levied in an earlier Fiscal Year if the CFD Administrator has determined (i) that all required interest and principal payments on the CFD No. 2006-02 Bonds have been paid; and (ii) all Authorized Facilities have been constructed. P710 N O ~~ ~p N o ~ ~ O E o N J o ~ LL V Q C U U in 0 i o ~ ''Yti ~ ~ J ~ o .y y ; ~ o .~ '~ ~ m ~ yr ! ~+ r 3 .~ ~ m i; o ' ,° ¢` V ! _.._.. Rj ! i ny ise3 in 1 ® ! t 1 ~ i ny epuenn133 ny epuennR3 ~C ~ ~ ~ aa~ e ~9 ~I _. ~.._4 .._.._. i 0 ny ~alsayooa ny ~alsayooa (~ ~.._ i ny ua~IIIIW ~ .._.._.._.._ ny ua~!II!W i i i ny uaneH • ny uaneH i i ny esow~aH ~ ny esow~aH i ny pleq!y~~y . ^d Ple4!yo~b' ! ny uewllaH ny uewllaH i ~~ ~ t~•• r ~ ny p~e~Cauln ~~~~li~~~~~~ 3Suellawe~~ .' a a~~~~yy~~,~~ ~ T m LL ~8~~~i!~~~A~' ,v_ C t N m a ~U Pik:€it;l€i P711 T H E C I T Y O F A N C H O C U C A M O N G.A Staff Report DATE: June 3, 2009 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: John R. Gillison, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Service BY: Ingrid Y. Bruce, GIS/Special Districts Manager SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING AN ANNUAL LEVY WITHIN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 93-1, MASI PLAZA, AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF ROCHESTER AVENUE AND FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND REASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 1999-1 WITH NO INCREASE TO THE CURRENT RATE. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached Resolution authorizing an annual levy for the costs incurred in the collection of assessments within Assessment District No. 93-1, Masi Plaza, at the southwest corner of Rochester Avenue and Foothill Boulevazd and Reassessment District No. 1999-1. There is no increase to the current rate for fiscal yeaz 2009/2010. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Section 8682 of the Government Code authorizes cities to collect an annual assessment fee of a maximum of five percent (5%) of the amount of installments and not to exceed sixteen dollars per parcel assessment for costs incurred in the administration and assessment collection. The requested fee will allow the City to recover funds for collection and management of assessment districts that aze applicable to the Improvement Bond Act of 1915. P712 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT ANNUAL LEVY June 3, 2009 Page 2 Rancho Cucamonga's comprehensive management program including record keeping, cost management, payoff calculations, monthly financial reports, debt service schedules, as well as providing information to the public is funded from this fee. This fee is in place now to pay for administration and will allow the City to maintain the current rate and level of service. Attachments: Resolution Maps -2- P713 RESOLUTION NO. ~'/~~ 2 Z A RESOLUTION OF THE CTI'Y COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RE-AUTHORIZING THE LEVY OF AN ASSESSMENT SURCHARGE FOR THE EXPENSES INCURRED IN THE COLLECTION OF ASSESSMENTS IN VARIOUS SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has heretofore undertaken proceedings pursuant to the "Municipal Improvement Act of 1913" being Division 12 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, and has confirmed assessments upon land within various special assessment districts (hereinafter collectively referred to as the "Assessment Districts"); and WHEREAS, said proceedings provided for and the City did subsequently issue bonds pursuant to the "Improvement Bond Act of 1915", being Division 10 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, said bonds representing unpaid assessments within the Assessment Districts; and WHEREAS, the City does incur necessary administrative expenses in the collection of the annual installments of the assessment within the Assessment Districts; and WHEREAS, Government Code Section 8682 does authorize the City to establish an assessment surchazge to allow the City to recover its expenses of collection of said assessments; and WHEREAS, the City desires to establish such an assessment surcharge as authorized by said Government Code Section 8682. NOW THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby resolve as follows: SECTION 1: That the above recitals aze all true and correct. SECTION 2: Treasurer is hereby directed to add to the annual installment of assessments within the Assessment Districts a maximum of five percent (5%) of the amount of the installments and of the interest thereon, not to exceed the Treasurer's estimate of the expenses of collection. Said expenses of collection shall include the necessary administrative expenses of the City incurred in providing the County Auditor with current information regarding the ownership or division of the affected lots or parcels of land within the Assessment Districts to ensure the proper entry by the County Auditor in his or her assessment roll and the timely collection of the Assessment installments. P714 SECTION 3: The above assessment surchazge, when collected, shall belong to the City and shall cover the expenses and compensation of the Treasurer incurred in the collection of the assessments, and of the interest and penalties added on to the assessments. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of June 2009. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: Donald J. Kurth, M.D., Mayor ATTEST: Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk I, JANICE C. REYNOLDS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a regulaz meeting of said City Council held on the day of June 2009. Executed this day of June 2009, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk P715 r M ~ /~~~ / ri 'fir ~ y '~ ~ J ~ •- ® Q o O •_ c p' r•1 ' N +., ~ ~ o ~ ~ _ o J CD ~ h ~ G> m o o ~ lL Q h ~ _.._.._ind lse3 vJ Q 1 ® i r 1 ~ ny epuenn!33 ny epueM!33 i i ~g ~aaJ~ ea . a.._.._.._.._.._.._. _ i ~ ny Jalsay~oa ny Jalsayooa r"' i ,_.._.._.._.._. ny ua~!II!W i ny ua~l!II!W i i i ny uaneH • ny uaneH i i ny esowJaH i nt/ esowJaH i nH Pleq!4oJV : nH PIeQ!4oJ`d ! ! ny uewllaH i a ~ ~cn •• ny uewllaH L ~ i r L v ny p e~(au!n i e.~:f~.~e~l 3S ue!lawe~' gFsst°~e 2 i ~ ••'t* FE F~}E• a 2 r.._.._. -"-• to ~ ~ ._..J•_•_ m Q! nb' aAOJ~ N g j 6EFe 2EF~ s~2 9! ~' ~ 1..~ . •-• « _ J - 3 ~ esjiS~P (~5 y~ [ ~ N ~ ~ c N LD O lL Q $ iE~~~~ Sifi S 6 ,.! { g ~: ~ N j, v c p fi ~ y i 9@~ ° ~ ~~ e , _ o~ N m p = 4 ppPB ~ Ee •2 ~E pr`~5, y H5~4S4 ~~ ga ~ss~ - 5 i tl €s~a~'3~F~p•$ ~ ~ fi i! ~2d:d i~ a P716 ~ d C ! ~~ /~ / ~ / i ~ ~ // ~/i y r J ~4t1 ~ ~ ^ c L o C U Q N o ~ " 3 ny ~tJJay~ _ ~ ~ ~ r J ti o Q ; .._.._.._.._ CZ' N ~ I tF C ^ r F J m ~ ~ A, I ~ ~ _ ~ 3 0 ! m o ~° a` h i h _.._.._inHlse3 in ~ ~ ® j h ~ y i ny epueM!33 ny epuenng3 tQ i i ~g ~aaJ~ ep •_u_u_o_o_.._e_uF ny Ja;say ooa ~ ny Ja;sayooa ~~.. i ny ua>I!II!W ~._.._.._.._.. nH ua~l!II!W i i 1 ny uaneH ~ ny uaneH 1 ny esowJaH ° ny esowJaH i nb' Ple4!4oJt1 1 nb' Ple4!4oJb' 1 ny uewllaH i ~ ny uewllaH 1 ~•• N L L 1 ~ co . ny pJe~(au!n i 3S ue!lawe~ ' ~ t ! ~ F r~..~ V ~ $j ¢ p i F ~ f 6E~'€it fg[ ~p ~t a i }~~¢ t.._..~ v .• ~ ,~. ••_•~'~• n`F/aAOJ~ F ~al~!a iga¢ Fri#!~ g$taro 882i€ •~~ N L O ~ t 1~°F r.._..~_.._.. .._. ~ ._ ~ .. . ` Q g E fi CCg i t ~ E f ' ~~ N c m ti ~ y e pp ~y9 ~ee yy t ~~ F ~[ ~ >. jj ¢ pi f sY m 55SS,,S11111FP~~ ~j E 8li 23 ~ o ~ = ' f {{ , 2 ~~ ~ ~ s~ ~U ~ 3;~aSE~ t3gog 8 ~ Eidtffd~a2 ~E