Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2007/06/27 - Agenda PacketC~~ THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA RANCHO G'UCAMONGA JUNE 27, 2007 - 7:00 PM Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center Council Chambers 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California ~. .~~., T~~~~ Pledge of Allegiance Roll Call Chairman Stewart_ Vice Chairman Fletcher _ • Macias _ VACANT _ Munoz H. ~~} ~ ~~~NTS None 'LH. .A~~~~' M~NU'3'ES None I'V. ~~DN~~~T'~`A~~N~A12 The following Consent Calendar-tems are expected to be rout-ne and non-controversial They will be acted on by the Commission atone t-me w-thout discussion If anyone has concern over any item, it should be removed for discussion ~. ~"UB~,fC ~~AitiNGS The following items are public hearings rn which concerned individuals may voice their opinion of the related project Please wart to be recognized by the Chairman and address the Commrssron by stating your name and address All such opinions shall be limited to 5 m-nutes per individual for each project Please sign in after speaking • 1 of .~i PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA RANCHO JUNE 27, 2007 CUCAMONGA A. TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18406 - JP MORGAN REAL ESTATE ASSET MGMT -Condominium Conversion to create 260 Residential Condominium urnts located in the Mixed Use/Retail Industrial District (Subarea 18) at 11100 4th Street The project qualifies as a Class 1 categorical exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15301, Existing Facilities APN 0210-082-62 B TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18485 - JP MORGAN REAL ESTATE ASSET MGMT -Condominium Conversion to create 260 Residential Condominium units located in the Mixed Use/Retail Industrial District (Subarea 18) at 11100 4th Street. The project qualifies as a Class 1 categorical exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15301, Existing Facilities. APN 0210-082-63. C ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2006-00223 - ARBORS AT ROUTE 66 LLC - A request to change the land use designation for four parcels on Red Hill Country Club Drive from Open Space to Mixed Use to be consistent with the Mixed Use land use designation at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Grove Avenue, to add these same four parcels to Section 2 5 5 4 Western Gateway in the Bear Gulch Area, expand the range of development in the Residential classification to 87% in Table III-7, and to establish a Master Plan Overlay District for the entire 10.1 acre project site on the Land Use Plan in accordance with Section 111.2 4 1 of the General Plan -APN 0207- 011-35, 36, 41, 43, 44 and 45 Related Files. Development District Amendment DRC2006-00350, Development Code Amendment DRC2007- 00029, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18179, Development Review DRC2006-00341 D ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT DRC2006-00350 -ARBORS AT ROUTE 66 LLC - A request to change the zoning for four parcels on Red Hill Country Club Drive from Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) to Mixed Use to be consistent with the Mixed Use zoning designation at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Grove Avenue; Establish a Master Plan Overlay District for the entire 10 1 acre project site on the Development District Map in accordance with Section 17.20.030 of the Development Code; at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Grove Avenue -APN 0207- 011-35, 36, 41, 43, 44 and 45 Related Files: General Plan Amendment DRC2006-00223, Development Code Amendment DRC2007-00029, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18179, Development Review DRC2006- 00341. • • • 2 of 5 • • • PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA JUNE 27, 2007 RANCHO C UCAMONGA , ~ ~fl~SS~O~T BT7~'~N~S/~~O~ENT~ VT~~. A~JOUT~fi+~'~' The Planning Commiss-on has adopted Adm-n-strative Regulations that set an 11 00 p m. adjournment t-me If -tems go beyond that t-me, they shall be heard only wdh the consent of the Comm-ss-on 1, Barbara L Tuncay, P/ann-ng Department Secretary of the C-ty of Rancho Cucamonga, or my des-gnee, hereby cert-fy that a true, accurate copy of the forego-ng agenda was posted on , at least 72 hours pr-or to the meetrng per Government de Sect-on 54964 2 at 10500 CIVIC Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in t s meeting, please contact the Planning Department at (909) 477-2750 Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility Listernng devices are available for the hearing impaired INFORMATION FOR THE PUBLIC TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION The Planning Commission encourages free expression of all points of view To allow all persons to speak, given the length of the agenda, please keep your remarks beef If others have already expressed your position, you may simply indicate that you agree with a previous speaker If appropriate, a spokesperson may present the views of your entire group To encourage all views and promote courtesy to others, the audience should refrain from clapping, booing or shouts of approval or disagreement from the audience The public may address the Planning Commission on any agenda item To address the Planning Commission, please come forward to the podium located at the center of the staff table State your name for the record and speak into the microphone After speaking, please sign in on the clipboard located next to the speaker's podium It is important to list your name, address and the agenda item letter your comments refer to Comments are generally limited to 5 minutes per individual If you wish to speak concerning an item not on the agenda, you may do so under "Public 4 of 5 PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA R~~HO JUNE 27, 2007 C,UCAMONGA Comments " There is opporturnty to speak under this section prior to the end of the agenda Any handouts for the Planning Commission should be given to the Planning Commission Secretary for distribution to the Commissioners All requests for items to be placed on a Planning Commission agenda must be in writing The deadline for submitting these items is 6 00 p m Tuesday, one week prior to the meeting The Planning Commission Secretary receives all such items AVAILABILITY OF STAFF REPORTS Copies of the staff reports or other documentation to each agenda item are on file in the offices of the Planning Department, City Hall, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 These documents are avatlable for public inspections dunng regular business hours, Monday through Thursday, 7 00 a m to 6 00 p m ,except for legal City holidays APPEALS Any interested party who disagrees with the City Planrnng Commission decision may appeal the Commission's decision to the City Council within 10 calendar days Any appeal fled must be directed to the City Clerk's Office and must be accompanied by a fee of $1,747 for maps and $1,842 for all other decisions of the Commission (Fees are established and governed by the City Council) Please turn off all cellular phones and pagers while the meeting is in session. Copies of the Planning Commission agendas and minutes can be found at http:/lwww.ci.rancho-Cucamonga ca.us • • • 5 of 5 Vicinity Map Planning Commission June 27, 2007 Q N Meeting Location: City Hall 10500 Civic Center Drive CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM DATE: June 27, 2007 TO: James Troyer, Planning Director FROM: Dan James, Senior Civil Engineer SUBJECT: Planning Commission Agenda Items C, D, E, F, & G City of Upland Concerns City of Upland has three requested changes to the conditions of approval. Their request and response are as follows: 1. Planning Department: Condition No. 7 should be modified to require the installation of a protected left-turn signal for southbound Grove Avenue on to Foothill Blvd without reference to warrant studies. Response: Modify Resolution No. 07-38 and Resolution No. 07-39 Planning Department Condition No. 7 on pages C, D, E, F, G 383 and 427 respectively as follows: The applicant shall submit a request to Caltrans for the installation of a protected left-turn signal for southbound Grove Avenue on to Foothill Boulevard and provide any warrant studies required by Caltrans. If approved by Caltrans applicant shall provide for all improvements necessary for the protected left-turn signal. 2. Engineering Department: Condition No. 2 should be modified to require the developer to secure a quitclaim of the easement for street purposes from the City of Upland and conveyance directly to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Response. This is the intent of Condition No. 2 and no modification is necessary. Also since the existing easement is in favor of the City of Upland they will have control of the quitclaim process. 3. Engineering Department: Condition 3a should be added to continue prohibiting parking on the east side of Grove Avenue adjacent to the project. Response: Engineering Department Condition 8g requires applicant to provide or protect R26(s) "No Stopping" signs. Therefore Uplands concerns are already addressed and no modification is necessary. f ~~~~ ~ From: To:94772847 06!2712007 13:41 #592 P.001I002 June 26, 2007 Mr. James R. Troyer, AICP Planning Director City of Rancho Cucamonga P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Dear Mr. Troyer: Public Works Department Development Services 460 North Euclid Avenue Upland, CA 91786 Telephone (909) 931-4145 Facsimile (909} 931-4321 CITY OE RANCHO CUCAIVONGA JUN 2 ~ 2007 RECEIVEC~ - PLANPJING SUB7ECT: ARBORS AT ROUTE 66 MIXED-USE PR07ECT TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS Dear Mr. Troyer: Upland staff has reviewed the subject report and have the following continuing concerns: 1. The traffic study does not indicate that the project would have a reduced traffic impact if a second controlled access was provided to Red Hill Country Club Drive. 2. The traffic impacts and off-street parking issues resulting from the proposed project need to be addressed as they relate to the Grove Avenue residential area in Upland. The overall issues are very similar to those being addressed for the areas accessed by Red hJill Country Club Drive. Three changes are requested to your Planning Commission Resolution No.07-38 as follows: 1. Planning Department: Condition No.7 should be modified to require the installation of a protected left-turn signal for southbound Grove Avenue on to Foothill Boulevard without reference to warrant studies. Fde Name R 1DeeWrbors at Route 66 Maed-Use TlA 6 25 07 doc From: To:94772847 06/27/2007 13:42 #592 P. 002/002 2. Engineering Department: Condition No.2 should be modified to require the developer to secure a quitclaim of the easement for street purposes from the City of Upland and conveyance directly to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. We are concerned that the easement for the street remains in public control as there are street improvements already in place. 3. Engineering Department: Condition 3a should be added to continue prohibiting parking on the east side of Grove Avenue adjacent to the project. If you have any questions, please call me at (909) 931-4131. Sincerely, ~ . ~~~ Jeffrey A. Bloom Community Development Director PO Box 460 Upland, CA 91785-0460 Telephone: (909) 931-4131 Fax: (909) 931-4321 Email: ibloomCcaci.upiand.ca.us Cc; Anthony La, Public Works Director Paul Martin, RBF Consulting Fde Name. R,1DeelArbors at Route 6fi Moced-Use TIA 8 25 01 doc .r L~ i~ ~~ ~ RESOLUTION NO 07-40 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18485, A SUBDIVISION FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES OF CONVERTING 236 UNITS INTO 236 RESIDENTIAL CONDOMINIUMS ON 11 1 ACRES OF LAND IN THE MIXED USE/RESIDENTIAL (SUBAREA18), LOCATED AT 11201 5TH STREET, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN 0210-082-63 A Recitals 1 JP Morgan Real Estate Asset Management filed an application for the approval of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18485, as described in the title of this Resolution Hereinafter m this Resolution, the subject Tentative Tract Map request is referred to as "the application " 2 On the 27th day of June 2007, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date 3 All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred B Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows 1 This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth m the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on June 27, 2007, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows a The application applies to the property located at 11201 5th Street on an irregular lot of 11 1 acres and is presently improved with 236 apartment units, and b The property to the north of the subject site is residential, the property to the south w^,~;~*~-is residenfial, the property to the east is residential, and the property to the west is a golf course, and c The property is a-~ improved with an existing residential use from 2003 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows a That the Tentative Tract Map is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable specific plans, and b The design or improvements of the Tentative Tract Map is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable specific plans, and The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed, and ~~~ PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2006-00223, -00341, -00350, DRC2007-00029, AND SUBTT18179 -ARBORS AT ROUTE 66, LLC June 27, 2007 Page 3 F Parking Calculations Number of Number of Type Square Parking Spaces Spaces of Use Footage Ratio Required Provided Residential 2/unit a-9~ 196 196 Guest Parking %4 units 25 34 Office 12,610 s f. 1/250 s f 50 52 TOTALS ~ 271 282 ANALYSIS A General Traffic -The proposed project has been analyzed by the applicant's traffic engineers, and the resulting report has been reviewed and accepted by the City's Traffic Engineer Generally, the findings of the report are that the traffic impact from the project is not significant Based on industry standards, the project will generate 799 daily trips. The project will generate 69 two-way trips m the a m peak hour (7 to 9 a.m) and 82 two-way taps m the p m peak hour (4 to 6 p m ), both significantly less than the 250 two way trips which would trigger a Traffic Impact Analysis required under the County's Congestion Management Program The project proposes two ingress/egress points. The point along Grove Avenue is full access for all users and tenants in both the residential portion and the office portion The point along Red Hill Country Club Drive is for emergency access only and will be gate-protected for that purpose The traffic generated by the project will access the site through the intersection of Foothill Boulevard and Grove Avenue The daily trips and the peak hour taps will not increase the Level of Service (LOS) grade beyond the acceptable LOS C that it operates under today Substantial concern has been voiced over the traffic impact of the project on trips that will use the local residential streets on Red Hill County Club Drive to shortcut up or down from Base Line Road. The traffic analysis, based on industry standards, City-generated traffic counts from April 2006 and other information provided by the City's Traffic Engineer, shows that the project will generate an additional four a m peak-hour trips and zero p m peak-hour trips with a total daily traffic increase of 0 6 percent over current levels Part of these numbers are based on the Central School District information that the district anticipates the project to generate approximately 17 (total) children (K-8), some of whom will attend Valle Vista School on Red Hill County Club Drive Based on current information on the Central School Distract website, enrollment for this school site is projected to drop i i ~ ~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 07-38 SUBTT18179 -ARBORS AT ROUTE 66, LLC June 27, 2007 Page 3 5 Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth m Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and m the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference Planning Department 1) This application is subject to the approval of General Plan Amendment DRC2006-00223, Development District Amendment DRC2006-00350 and Development Code Amendment DRC2007-00029 by the City Council and approval of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18179 and Development Review DRC2006-00341 by the Planning Commission. 2) All conditions imposed on General Plan Amendment DRC2006-00223, Development District Amendment DRC2006-00350 and Development Code Amendment DRC2007-00029 by the City Council and Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18179 and Development Review DRC2006-00341 by the Planning Commission shall be a condition of approval for this resolution. 3) The applicant shall execute a covenant on the land in a form substantially similar to the Parking Declaration attached to the accompanying Staff Report m order to make the parking area of the office building available to the residents during off hours 4) The applicant shall execute a covenant on the land m a form substantially similar to the Use Restrictions attached to the accompanying Staff Report m order to only allow uses in the live/work units that are compatible with the Master Plan 5) The signage for the office building shall incorporate a restrained use of off-lighting orhalo-lighting with minimal identification within the confines of the Foothill Boulevard Route 66 Visual Improvement Plan Sign review is a separate review process 6) The lobby entry door and surrounding areas shall incorporate decorative security measures to be reviewed by the Planning Director for compatibility with the architectural design of the office building 7) The applicant shall provide studies necessary to determine if a protected left-turn signal for southbound Grove Avenue onto Foothill Boulevard is warranted and shall install it subject to CalTrans approval, if necessary Engineering Department 7 J ~~J ~ ~~~~ STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18179 SUBJECT: SUBDIVISION OF 10 1 ACRES INTO TWO LOTS APPLICANT: ARBORS AT ROUTE 66, LLC LOCATION: NORTHEAST CORNER OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND GROVE AVENUE ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: A. General Requirements The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the Clty, Its agents, officers, or employees, because of the Issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval The applicant shall reimburse the City, Its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action The City may, at Its sole discretion, participate at Its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition 2 Approval of Tentative Tract No. SUBTT18179 is granted subject to the approval of General Plan Amendment DRC2006-00223, Development District Amendment DRC2006-00350, Development Code Amendment DRC2007-00029, and Development Review DRC2006-00341. 3 Copses of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No 07-38, Standard Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size) The sheet(s) are for Information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect 4 The applicant shall be required to pay any applicable Flsh and Game fees as shown below The project planner will confirm which fees apply to this project All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary priorto the Planning Commission or Planning Director hearing a) Notice of Determination - $50 b) Negative Declaration - $ 1,850 Completion Date -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- I \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2007 Res 8~ Stf Rpt\SUBTT18179StdCond 6-27 doc ~/ ~ ~ ~~ j ~J~ ~~~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 07-39 DRC2006-00341 -ARBORS AT ROUTE 66, LLC June 27, 2007 Page 3 5 Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference Planning Department 1) This application is subject to the approval of General Plan Amendment DRC2006-00223, Development District Amendment DRC2006-00350, and Development Code Amendment DRC2007-00029 by the City Council and approval of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18179 by the Planning Commission. 2) All conditions imposed on General Plan Amendment DRC2006-00223, Development District Amendment DRC2006-00350 and Development Code Amendment DRC2007-00029 by the City Council, and Development Review DRC2006-00341 and Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18179 by the Planning Commission shall be a condition of approval for this resolution. 3) The applicant shall execute a covenant on the land m a form substantially similar to the Parking Declaration attached to the accompanying Staff Report in order to make the parking area of the office building available to the residents during off hours 4) The applicant shall execute a covenant on the land m a form substantially similar to the Use Restrictions attached to the accompanying Staff Report m order to only allow uses m the live/work units that are compatible with the Master Plan 5) The signage for the office building shall incorporate a restrained use of off-lighting orhalo-lighting with minimal identification within the confines of the Foothill Boulevard Route 66 Visual Improvement Plan Sign review is a separate review process 6) The lobby entry door and surrounding areas shall incorporate decorative security measures to be reviewed by the Planning Director for compatibility with the architectural design of the office building 7) The applicant shall provide studies necessary to determine if a protected left-turn signal for southbound Grove Avenue onto Foothill Boulevard is warranted and shall install it subject to CalTrans approval, if necessary Engineering Department 1) Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surface drainage entering the property from adjacent areas Consider the Q~oo runoff flow of 27 8 cfs entering the project site from the north indicated in the January 2006 Parsons-Brinkerhoff Drainage Study PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 07-39 DRC2006-00341 -ARBORS AT ROUTE 66, LLC June 27, 2007 Page 4 3) Final Map shall show corner property line cutoff per City Standard Drawing No 102, show point access easements for Lots 1 and 2, and wall-only easement for entry monument 4) Once Red Hill Country Club Drive is realigned the City will pursue the vacation of the existing Red Hill Country Club Drive along this development's frontage. This development shall install temporary frontage improvements along Red Hill Country Club Drive subject to City Engineer and Planning Director approval. Prior to recordation of the final map this development shall substantiate to the City Engineer's satisfaction that upon future vacation of Red Hill Country Club Drive this development will provide for removals and establishment of the new facilities along Red Hill Country Club Drive subject to City Engineer and Planning Director approval. 5) Provide a study necessary to determine if protected left-turn signals for north and southbound Grove Avenue onto Foothill Boulevard are warranted and install them subject to Caltrans approval, if necessary 6) Foothill Boulevard improvements, including City entry monument and entry gateway at the Grove Avenue\Foothill Boulevard intersection, streetlights, patterned sidewalk with tree wells, etc shall conform to the Visual Improvement Program for Foothill Boulevard and the Foothill Boulevard Districts guidelines outlined in the Development Code 7) Foothill Boulevard frontage improvements are to be in accordance with City "Mayor Divided Arterial Streets" standards Install curb and gutter, asphalt pavement, sidewalk, streetlights, ADA access ramps, and street trees per City standards, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer a) Provide 27,000 and 16,000 lumen HPSV streetlights, in accordance with the Foothill Visual Improvement Plan b) Provide dual ADA access ramps at the Grove Avenue\Foothill Boulevard intersection per City Standard Drawing No 102 c) Protect existing street improvements d) Provide or protect R26(s) "No Stopping" signs along the frontage e) Protect or replace traffic signal equipment 8) Grove Avenue frontage improvements are to be in accordance with City "Secondary Arterial Streets" standards Install sidewalk, drive approach, streetlights, and street trees per City standards, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer a) An exception to the 50-foot maximum dnve approach width (60 feet is being allowed for this project) is permitted although the drive approach shall comply with City Standard Drawing No 101 G ~ ~ F ~' ~~~ y c. y ~~ ~ / / J STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2006-00341 SUBJECT: MASTERPLAN FORA 10 1 ACRE PROJECT SITE APPLICANT: ARBORS AT ROUTE 66. LLC LOCATION: NORTHEAST CORNER OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND GROVE AVENUE ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: A. General Requirements The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, Its agents, officers, or employees, because of the Issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval The appllcant shall reimburse the City, Its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the Clty, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve appllcant of his obligations under this condition Approval of Development Review DRC2006-00341 is granted subject to the approval of General Plan Amendment DRC2006-00223, Development District Amendment DRC2006-00350, Development Code Amendment DRC2007-00029, and Tentative Tract SUBTT18179. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No 07-39, Standard Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size) The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect 4 The appllcant shall be required to pay any applicable Fish and Game fees as shown below The project planner will confirm which fees apply to this project All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary priorto the Planning Commission or Planning Director hearing a) Notice of Determination - $50 b) Negative Declaration - $ 1,850 Completion Date -/-/- -/-/- _/-/- I \PLANNING\FINAL\PLN ~COMM12007 Res & Stf Rpt\DRC2006-00341StdConds 6-27 doc ~i ~ ~J ~ ~ ~ ~~ e y~'~ P.J. Partridge 8445 Valle Vista Place Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. 91730 909-949-0123 June 7, 2007 The Planning Commission The City Council City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. 91729 Attention: Vance Pomeroy Re: Arbors at Route 66 TTM 18179 Honorable Commissioners and City Council Members: s •t f ~ r ~,.~ ff y r ~ ! a/'*. 'A. /[, ri I have reviewed the plans and other information related to this project and met with the developers. I feel that this is a high quality development which would be an asset to our community and wanted to express my support. Thank you for your consideration and please feel free to call me with any questions. Sincerely, P.J. Partridge C ~ ~ ~ ~ RESOLUTION NO 07-40 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18485, A SUBDIVISION FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES OF CONVERTING 236 UNITS INTO 236 RESIDENTIAL CONDOMINIUMS ON 11 1 ACRES OF LAND IN THE MIXED USE/RESIDENTIAL (SUBAREA18), LOCATED AT 11201 5TH STREET, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN 0210-082-63 A Recitals 1 JP Morgan Real Estate Asset Management filed an application for the approval of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18485, as described in the title of this Resolution Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Tentative Tract Map request is referred to as "the application " 2 On the 27th day of June 2007, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public heanng on the application and concluded said hearing on that date 3 All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred B Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows 1 This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public heanng on June 27, 2007, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows a The application applies to the property located at 11201 5th Street on an irregular lot of 11 1 acres and is presently improved with 236 apartment units, and b The property to the north of the subJect site is residential, the property to the south ^^~;~tTis residential, the property to the east is residential, and the property to the west is a golf course, and c The property is a~ improved with an existing residential use from 2003 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows a That the Tentative Tract Map is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable specific plans, and b The design or improvements of the Tentative Tract Map is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable specific plans, and c The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed, and ~~7 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2006-00223, -00341, -00350, DRC2007-00029, AND SUBTT18179 -ARBORS AT ROUTE 66, LLC June 27, 2007 Page 3 F Parking Calculations Number of Number of Type Square Parking Spaces Spaces of Use Footage Ratio Required Provided Residential 2/unit a-9~ 196 196 Guest Parking %4 units 25 34 Office 12,610 s f 1/250 s f 50 52 TOTALS ~ 271 282 ANALYSIS A General Traffic -The proposed protect has been analyzed by the applicant's traffic engineers, and the resulting report has been reviewed and accepted by the City's Traffic Engineer Generally, the findings of the report are that the traffic impact from the protect is not significant Based on industry standards, the protect will generate 799 daily trips The protect will generate 69 two-way trips in the a m peak hour (7 to 9 a m) and 82 two-way trips m the p m peak hour (4 to 6 p m ), both significantly less than the 250 two way trips which would trigger a Traffic Impact Analysis required under the County's Congestion Management Program The protect proposes two ingress/egress points The point along Grove Avenue is full access for all users and tenants m both the residential portion and the office portion The point along Red Hill Country Club Drave is for emergency access only and will be gate-protected for that purpose The traffic generated by the protect will access the site through the intersection of Foothill Boulevard and Grove Avenue The daily trips and the peak hour trips will not increase the Level of Service (LOS) grade beyond the acceptable LOS C that it operates under today Substantial concern has been voiced over the traffic impact of the protect on trips that will use the local residential streets on Red Hill County Club Drive to shortcut up or down from Base Line Road The traffic analysis, based on industry standards, City-generated traffic counts from April 2006 and other information provided by the City's Traffic Engineer, shows that the protect will generate an additional four a m peak-hour taps and zero p m peak-hour trips with a total daily traffic increase of 0 6 percent over current levels Part of these numbers are based on the Central School District information that the district anticipates the protect to generate approximately 17 (total) children (K-8), some of whom will attend Valle Vista School on Red Hill County Club Drive Based on current information on the Central School Distract website, enrollment for this school site is protected to drop i ~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 07-38 SUBTT18179 -ARBORS AT ROUTE 66, LLC June 27, 2007 Page 3 5 Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth m Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference Planning Department 1) This application is subject to the approval of General Plan Amendment DRC2006-00223, Development District Amendment DRC2006-00350 and Development Code Amendment DRC2007-00029 by the City Council and approval of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18179 and Development Review DRC2006-00341 by the Planning Commission. 2) All conditions imposed on General Plan Amendment DRC2006-00223, Development District Amendment DRC2006-00350 and Development Code Amendment DRC2007-00029 by the City Council and Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18179 and Development Review DRC2006-00341 by the Planning Commission shall be a condition of approval for this resolution. 3) The applicant shall execute a covenant on the land in a form substantially similar to the Parking Declaration attached to the accompanying Staff Report m order to make the parking area of the office building available to the residents during off hours 4) The applicant shall execute a covenant on the land in a form substantially similar to the Use Restrictions attached to the accompanying Staff Report in order to only allow uses in the live/work units that are compatible with the Master Plan 5) The signage for the office building shall incorporate a restrained use of off-lighting orhalo-lighting with mirnmal identification within the confines of the Foothill Boulevard Route 66 Visual Improvement Plan Sign review is a separate review process 6) The lobby entry door and surrounding areas shall incorporate decorative security measures to be reviewed by the Planning Director for compatibility with the architectural design of the office building 7) The applicant shall provide studies necessary to determine if a protected left-turn signal for southbound Grove Avenue onto Foothill Boulevard is warranted and shall install it subject to CalTrans approval, if necessary Engineering Department C ~ ~ i COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18179 SUBJECT: SUBDIVISION OF 10 1 ACRES INTO TWO LOTS APPLICANT: ARBORS AT ROUTE 66. LLC LOCATION: NORTHEAST CORNER OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND GROVE AVENUE ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: A. General Requirements The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, Its agents, officers, or employees, because of the Issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval The appllcant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action The City may, at Its sole discretion, participate at Its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition 2 Approval of Tentative Tract No. SUBTT18179 is granted subject to the approval of General Plan Amendment DRC2006-00223, Development District Amendment DRC2006-00350, Development Code Amendment DRC2007-00029, and Development Review DRC2006-00341. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No 07-38, Standard Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size) The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect 4 The appllcant shall be required to pay any applicable Flsh and Game fees as shown below The project planner will confirm which fees apply to this project All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to the Planning Commission or Planning Director hearing a) Notice of Determination - $50 b) Negative Declaration - $ 1,850 Completion Date -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- I \PLANNINGIFINAL\PLNGCOMM\2007 Res & Stf Rpt\SUBTT18179StdCond 6-27 doc PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 07-39 DRC2006-00341 -ARBORS AT ROUTE 66, LLC June 27, 2007 Page 3 5 Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and m the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference Planning Department 1) This application is subject to the approval of General Plan Amendment DRC2006-00223, Development District Amendment DRC2006-00350, and Development Code Amendment DRC2007-00029 by the City Council and approval of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18179 by the Planning Commission. 2) All conditions imposed on General Plan Amendment DRC2006-00223, Development District Amendment DRC2006-00350 and Development Code Amendment DRC2007-00029 by the City Council, and Development Review DRC2006-00341 and Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18179 by the Planning Commission shall be a condition of approval for this resolution. 3) The applicant shall execute a covenant on the land in a form substantially similar to the Parking Declaration attached to the accompanying Staff Report in order to make the parking area of the office building available to the residents during off hours 4) The applicant shall execute a covenant on the land in a form substantially similar to the Use Restrictions attached to the accompanying Staff Report in order to only allow uses in the live/work units that are compatible with the Master Plan 5) The signage for the office building shall incorporate a restrained use of off-lighting orhalo-lighting with minimal identification within the confines of the Foothill Boulevard Route 66 Visual Improvement Plan Sign review is a separate review process 6) The lobby entry door and surrounding areas shall incorporate decorative security measures to be reviewed by the Planning Director for compatibility with the architectural design of the office building 7) The applicant shall provide studies necessary to determine if a protected left-turn signal for southbound Grove Avenue onto Foothill Boulevard is warranted and shall install it subject to CalTrans approval, if necessary Engineering Department 1) Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surface drainage entering the property from adJacent areas Consider the Q,oo runoff flow of 27 8 cfs entering the project site from the north indicated in the January 2006 Parsons-Brinkerhoff Drainage Study C~.z~~~~ ,~j~' y~7 i / ~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 07-39 DRC2006-00341 -ARBORS AT ROUTE 66, LLC June 27, 2007 Page 4 3) Final Map shall show corner property line cutoff per City Standard Drawing No 102, show point access easements for Lots 1 and 2, and wall-only easement for entry monument 4) Once Red Hill Country Club Drive is realigned the City will pursue the vacation of the existing Red Hill Country Club Drive along this development's frontage. This development shall install temporary frontage improvements along Red Hill Country Club Drive subject to City Engineer and Planning Director approval. Prior to recordation of the final map this development shall substantiate to the City Engineer's satisfaction that upon future vacation of Red Hill Country Club Drive this development will provide for removals and establishment of the new facilities along Red Hill Country Club Drive subject to City Engineer and Planning Director approval. 5) Provide a study necessary to determine if protected left-turn signals for north and southbound Grove Avenue onto Foothill Boulevard are warranted and install them subject to Caltrans approval, if necessary 6) Foothill Boulevard improvements, including City entry monument and entry gateway at the Grove Avenue\Foothill Boulevard intersection, streetlights, patterned sidewalk with tree wells, etc shall conform to the Visual Improvement Program for Foothill Boulevard and the Foothill Boulevard Distracts guidelines outlined in the Development Code 7) Foothill Boulevard frontage improvements are to be m accordance with City "Mayor Divided Arterial Streets" standards Install curb and gutter, asphalt pavement, sidewalk, streetlights, ADA access ramps, and street trees per City standards, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer a) Provide 27,000 and 16,000 lumen HPSV streetlights, in accordance with the Foothill Visual Improvement Plan b) Provide dual ADA access ramps at the Grove Avenue\Foothill Boulevard intersection per City Standard Drawing No 102 c) Protect existing street improvements d) Provide or protect R26(s) "No Stopping" signs along the frontage e) Protect or replace traffic signal equipment 8) Grove Avenue frontage improvements are to be in accordance with City "Secondary Arterial Streets" standards Install sidewalk, drive approach, streetlights, and street trees per City standards, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer a) An exception to the 50-foot maximum drive approach width (60 feet is being allowed for this project) is permitted although the drave approach shall comply with City Standard Drawing No 101 G, ~ , COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT .~ ' DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2006-00341 SUBJECT: MASTERPLAN FORA 10 1 ACRE PROJECT SITE APPLICANT: ARBORS AT ROUTE 66. LLC LOCATION: NORTHEAST CORNER OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND GROVE AVENUE ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: A. General Requirements The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, Its agents, officers, or employees, because of the Issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval The applicant shall reimburse the City, Its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, Its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition Approval of Development Review DRC2006-00341 is granted subject to the approval of General Plan Amendment DRC2006-00223, Development District Amendment DRC2006-00350, Development Code Amendment DRC2007-00029, and Tentative Tract SUBTT18179. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No 07-39, Standard Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size) The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect 4 The applicant shall be required to pay any applicable Flsh and Game fees as shown below The project planner will confirm which fees apply to this project All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to the Planning Commission or Planning Director hearing a) Notice of Determination - $50 b) Negative Declaration - $ 1,850 Completion Date -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- I \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2007 Res & Stf Rpt\DRC2006-00341StdConds 6-27 doc / J J ,~ P.J. Partridge 8445 Valle Vista Place Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. 91730 909-949-0123 ]une 7, 2007 The Planning Commission The City Council City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. 91729 Attention: Vance Pomeroy Re: Arbors at Route 66 TTM 18179 Honorable Commissioners and City Council Members: ~~ , til / h; ~~~ I have reviewed the plans and other information related to this project and met with the developers. I feel that this is a high quality development which would be an asset to our community and wanted to express my support. Thank you for your consideration and please feel free to call me with any questions. Sincerely, _~r~~r ~~~~ P.J. Partridge ~_ J~ F , ~~ T H E C I T Y O F RANCHO IiUCAMONGA Staff Report DATE• June 27, 2007 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM' James R. Troyer, AICP, Planning Director BY: Vance Pomeroy, Contract Planner SUBJECT. TENTATIVE TRACT MAP AND ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW - SUBTT18406 - JP MORGAN REAL ESTATE ASSET MGMT -Condominium Conversion to create 260 Residential Condominium units located m the Mixed Use/Retail Industrial District (Subarea 18) at 11100 4th Street. The project qualifies as a Class 1 categorical exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15301, Existing Facilities. APN: 0210-082-62. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION' A. Project Density: 260 Units on 12.3 acres; 21.3 dwelling units per acre B. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning• North - Apartment units; Mixed Use/Retail in Industrial District 18 South - Commeraal m City of Ontario East - Apartment units; Mixed Use/Retail in Industrial District 18 West - Golf Course; Open Space in Industrial District 18 C. General Plan Designations: Protect Site - Mixed Use, General Dynamics Specific Plan North - Mixed Use; General Dynamics Specific Plan South - City of Ontario East - Mixed Use, General Dynamics Specific Plan West - Open Space; General Dynamics Specific Plan D Site Characteristics The subject property is fully developed with 260 residential apartment units with complete site improvement and surrounding infrastructure ANALYSIS: A. General: The protect site was completed in 2003 as part of the Ironwood Apartments, part of a 496-unit development. The conversion to condominiums will not alter the physical appearance of the site All required tenant notification under the Subdivision Map Act has been fulfilled for filing this request to convert ITEM A PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTT18406 - JP MORGAN REAL ESTATE ASSET MANAGEMENT June 27, 2007 Page 2 B Design Review Committee: The Design Review Committee recommended approval at their May 15, 2007, meeting. C. Technical Review Committee• The Technical Review Committee recommended approval of the project as presented D Environmental Assessment: The Planning Department Staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines. The project qualifies as a Class 1 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15301, Existing Facilities, because the buildings are existing and the use (residential) will not change, and there is no substantial evidence that the project may have a significant effect on the environment. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 660-foot radius of the project site. RECOMMENDATION• Staff recommends approval of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18406 through the adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval with Conditions Respectfully submitted, ~- Ja s R. Troyer, AICP Planning Director JRT:VP/ge Attachments: Exhibit A -Tentative Tract Map Exhibit B -Site Utilization/Aerial Map Exhibit C -Site Plan Exhibit D -Design Review Action Agenda May 15, 2007 Draft Resolution of Approval for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18406 • • A-2 • ~ 4 ' g _- "6 ~ H a ~~~~ a ~~h 3 a = ~ ~ ~~ ~ e ~ ~ W ~ ~ a ~~ a e~~ ~9~ ~ ~ ~5 g ~ s a ~ ~~ ~ ~g a a x'_~~f ~ y ~ 3~~ ~ ~~~q K~~ 9~ ~eE ~' ~ '~3 ~~~ a ~7 ~g ~~= ~Sy~ ~ ¢ ~' rv ~ < ~ ~ ~ ~ o~ ~ W ~~~~ ~~~ g~~~6i~~: ,ym~g~~~~€ ~~ ~~~~~g$~~~~4~$~ ~g~dd° ° ~~e -- ~~ o a ~oQa° ~ ~ o m~~~~n ~ ~~~~ bE' 8 ~q~ Sge`gn~F ~~ W°~ ~ F~ ~~~ ~y~ ~L ~~40W~b H s ~ g Qah ~~ 3 _ ~C a >`V<ix Z ~ ~ ~ i i ~ T I ~, 3 h ,~` ~ ~~ 1~r 1~LL 1 ~~ E CO Lu - - QCj~~~ /~ ~ aR~a~ ~ Lil':~ hid; - U (~~ ~ Q ~~~a l i 4 LLl .~ M1 ~ ,, ~~ , eggs ,~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ • ~ ~ - ---~~ l Z~ 1Ll(IO~ 3?//dW3 ~ ~ a ~~ e ~ ~ _ _ ~A t - , - -- ' r ~ ~ ,~. • ~ - ,, ~ ( ~ ~~ -,,1 - r ~ :~ .:. ,, ,~ a Ll~ r- N _ ~ ' i ~, 4 Cn T lLl C.. N 1 ,~ ~ tl II ~ ` ~ ~ L.) ,LU~LiIL~ - '~ ~ ~ y I ~ `~~~ ~ ~ ~ O r ~ p:l ~l~ ~ ~ ~ In L/~ Z ~ ~ Lid , -~ LLB `1 ~~ , L °' ~ .~ `s a - EXHIBIT A ~,tS t _~ H ~I ~ W~ ~I H i i y W ~ W ` ~~ F f f EXHIBIT B a., tszs'i s<m lZlZ6 YIN210311bJ '00314 NdS OOZ # 311(15 '3Sf10H3210W OLSS '~NI lbllN3aIS32! a131~?Jlbd bIN210311b'J 'b'JNOWb'Jf1J OHJNV21 1332115 Hlb OOlll S1N3W121bdb QOOMN0211 ___ ..- {6szs ~ ~~~~.~' ~ m CT • `' ~ ~ ~ ~O Ill~t~ • ~ a~ v ~~~~ S C Q ~ SS~~ ~ ~ ~a; < a c~~l ~ ; ~ ~ ~ ~ G ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . °+ a F o" ` s ~ ~ ~ ~ sg ry~Jl) • 9R~ o i L ~ aaa _ ~ °a. ~ 7j c i F ~ia$~$$$~$~8$§de~flftPfie°°s$$°~$ F ~ AV I p `\33` ~N_.~.~ nwq_www,.va... ag .. ~~ pp gf u F ~y$ A~ Fr ±y~{y~ ~S ~ j ~ ~<'. ~.777777'.:::sG:: c:::: s:ii {f ~!:' 6fJ ~1 i•€€ i ~ ~ ~ ~35~~~~3i~5315~535i5~~5~~Si~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ gip? ~ ~ ~ ~ g ec ~ F: ~ E E^Y ~ ~1 p~ C g- rp~~ a n ~ ~ ~~ ~~ $ y~s ~g: ~~ Ce ~ ~~ 5 ? s B ~~ y 8a d ~: ~ }g 3 ! 6 1' ilk ~ 5 g6 ~ ~~ 3~ k~ yp S g i ~ Y g ¢ ~~ ~ M~# ~~ ~~ ~ ~~s ~ B $ bgg` $ e ES s ~i ~ 8! e F ~ 9 ~~ ~ ~ ~j 1 1 i • • EXHIBIT C l 8 ~1 4~ ,,\ -f-$~°d~$$@"s$,• d$~a Ie~...R,s~$F"s$ •~gFry ~ka~ 2 ~ 3^«2c g xc«• x A ~xas;., °~ ___ 8 a u <^^k f M j s } Fa$ 1~ 7 $t€g~.Eg.~iF c 1$ ~~b Et€iisEi~i~~l ~ ~ !!~ l~+g g t#1~ I f~i ~~ ~iP fii3sai lss`a~$d#~'•~ iiii{~ l~,~s,~ ~#aa g!! !4; ! ~~~# , ~~~ ~#~!!ss'.• 4 ~~~ ~ €S af~a e2~ ~¢ R I ! ~ F ~sgi ~FE(efa~~~~~s~ ~~ ~ Y tl,R ~ Fa E d i ~~l aa~g€i~~a ~ ~ 1~}9~aQ~~4~~.~ %'r ~~ '° aA ~~~:~~e~~`ai • ~,r. 7 1; iQ Iag~~~ fi<~#~;~~€ r BE pa sgs s j if ~~} ~~~~1~~~~~ ;f13~~ ~~~~iEIE§~ i"`1~ aggiaElE~,! a~l;a~~ cid°~FeeeP~ ~ 1 1! ~&; ('a saki ~ # f a ~~~ f{~~ IItY }~F~1 ~ !y~!y ' 1 i ~ ~~~~ ai~€ ~6~sF #t'3~{:lt~#{ a- {a a S ~~cl .1~_ia $$~1 1= ~ p!^13~4Fa` i4~ ~~~a; j~ p ~aF ~lg~#13 :Ie~4 s a~af§3r.s ~?#ii! 11 ~t4 a ~ a _~ _ ~~ 3~iF i5~l: ~a4 a~eF~7 _~~~ m a~s~~li~ 1~1i 11~4~a1.°~ i[ pSSS a `•! Q ~IYSF ~Y ~'~ j~l~ ~~{{p~pE ~SF i all' ?s!, lg~gga~ €~ r ~~€ ~~ a~$ai~ ~ i16~1! s 1 .;~~I fiat{` ~~E7~etIFa pC~ i~aa~ a~ ,~ ~aFSgiF4 ~i [<E £tf ,a 1 A-5 CONSENT DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 7 00 p m Vance Pomeroy May 15, 2007 TRACT MAP AND ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW SUBTT18406 - JP MORGAN REAL ESTATE ASSET MANAGEMENT -Condominium conversion to create 260 residential condominium units at 11100 4th Street - APN 0210-082-62 Design Parameters This request is to convert the existing 260-unit apartment complex into 260 residential condominium units The existing apartments were completed m 2003 as the Ironwood Apartments, part of a 496-unit development The property is located m the Industrial District Subarea 18, Planning Area VI, which permits multiple-family dwellings All condominium notification and tenant requirements under the Subdivision Map Act have been fulfilled for filing this request to convert Staff Comments Mayor Issues The following design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this project 1. No mayor planning or zoning issues have been identified by staff • Policy Issues The following items are a matter of Planning Commission policy and should be incorporated into the project design without discussion The project will be required to conform to applicable Building and Fire Code requirements at the time of plan check Staff Recommendation Staff recommends that the Committee recommend approval of this request to the Planning Commission Design Review Committee Action Members Present Munoz, Stewart, and Diaz Staff Planner Vance Pomeroy The Committee recommended approval of the project to the Planning Commission as presented • EXHIBIT D A-6 RESOLUTION NO 07-34 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. SUBTT18406, A SUBDIVISION FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES OF 260 RESIDENTIAL CONDOMINIUMS ON 12 3 ACRES OF LAND IN THE MIXED USE/RETAIL INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT (SUBAREA 18), LOCATED AT 11100 4TH STREET, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN 0210-082-62 A Recitals 1. JP Morgan Real Estate Asset Management filed an application for the approval of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18406, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Tentative Tract Map request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 27th day of June 2007, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows. 1 This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on June 27, 2007, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to the property located at 11100 4th Street on an irregular lot of 12 3 acres and is presently improved with 260 apartment units, and b The property to the north of the subject site is residential, the property to the south consists of commercial land in the City of Ontario, the property to the east is residential, and the property to the west is a golf course, and c The property is improved with an existing residential use from 2003. 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. That the Tentative Tract Map is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable specific plans; and b. The design or improvements of the Tentative Tract Map is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable specific plans, and c. The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed, and A-7 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 07-34 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18406 - JP MORGAN REAL ESTATE ASSET MANAGEMENT June 27, 2007 Page 2 d The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable intury to humans and wildlife or their habitat; and e The Tentative Tract Map is not likely to cause serious public health problems, and f. The design of the Tentative Tract Map will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. 4. The Planning Department Staff has determined that the protect is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines. The protect qualifies under the Class 1 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15301 Existing Facilities because the buildings are existing and the use (residential) will not change. In addition, there is no substantial evidence that the protect may have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Planning Department's determination of exemption, and based on its own independent tudgment, concurs in the staff's determination of exemption 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subtect to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Planning Department 1) The protect will be required to meet applicable Building and Fire Code • requirements at the time of plan check. Engineering Department 1) The final Tract Map shall be processed for approval and shall be recorded prior to issuance of Building Permits a) Plan check/processing fee will be determined at the time of plan check submittal. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 27TH DAY OF JUNE 2007. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY ATTEST Pam Stewart, Chairman James R. Troyer, AICP, Secretary I, James R Troyer, AICP, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, • do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 27th day of June 2007, by the following vote-to-wit A-8 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 07-34 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18406 - JP MORGAN REAL ESTATE ASSET MANAGEMENT June 27, 2007 • Page 3 AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES. COMMISSIONERS. ABSENT COMMISSIONERS: • A-9 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18406 SUBJECT: TENTATIVE TRACT MAP FOR CONDOMINIUM CONVERSION APPLICANT: J P. MORGAN REAL ESTATE ASSET MANAGEMENT LOCATION: 11100 4TH STREET - APN~ 0210-082-62 ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: General Requirements 1. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the Clty, Its agents, officers, or employees, because of the Issuance of such approval, or In the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the Clty, Its agents, officers, or employees maybe required by a court to pay as a result of such action The Clty may, at Its sole discretion, participate at Its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition 2 Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No 07-34, Standard Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size) The sheet(s) are for Information only to all parties Involved In the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect 3 The applicant shall be required to pay any applicable Fish and Game fees as shown below The project planner will confirm which fees apply to this protect All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to the Planning Commission or Planning Director hearing a) Notice of Exemption - $50 X b) Notice of Determination - $50 c) Mitigated/Negative Declaration - $ 1,850 d) Environmental Impact Report - $2,550 -1-05 I \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2007 Res & Stf Rpt\SUBTT18406StdCond 6-27 doc Completion Date -/-/- -/-~ -/-/. A•10 Protect No SUBTT18046 Completion Date B. Time Limits 1 Thls tentative tract map shall expire, unless extended by the Planning Commission, unless a _/_/_• complete final map is filed with the Clty Engineer within 3 years from the date of the approval. C. Sit e Development 1 The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include _/_/_ site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, Development Code regulations, and the General Dynamics Specific Plan 2 Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions _/_/_ of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director 3 Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Building Code and _/_/_ State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Department to show compliance The buildings shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy 4 Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be _/_/_ submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits 5 All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for _/_/_ consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first 6. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all _/_/_ other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the • time of building permit issuance 7. All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, _/_/_ including proper illumination 8 The Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) and Articles of Incorporation of the _/_/_ Homeowners' Association are subject to the approval of the Planning and Engineering Departments and the City Attorney They shall be recorded concurrently with the Final Map or prior to the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first A recorded copy shall be provided to the City Engineer The Homeowners' Association shall submit to the Planning Department a list of the name and address of their officers on or before January 1 of each and every year and whenever said information changes 9 All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property _/_/_ owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for Planning Director and City Engineer review and approved prior to the issuance of building permits D. Landscaping 1 For multi-family residential and non-residential development, property owners are responsible for _/_/_ the continual maintenance of all landscaped areas on-site, as well as contiguous planted areas within the public right-of-way All landscaped areas shall be kept free from weeds and debris and maintained in healthy and thriving condition, and shall receive regular pruning, fertilizing, mowing, and trimming Any damaged, dead, diseased, or decaying plant material shall be replaced within 30 days from the date of damage I \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2007 Res & Stf Rpt\SUBTT18046StdCond doc A-11 Project No SUBTT18046 Completion Date APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DEPARTMENT, FIRE PROTECTION ~ANNING SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING NDITIONS: SEE ATTACHED • • 3 I \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2007 Res & Stf Rpt\SUBTT18046StdCond doc A-12 f r ~~~ ,a. Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection ~yON ,~ • District } -~. . - ~- -- m~y Fire Construction Services STANDARD CONDITIONS February 26, 2007 Ironwoods Apartments 11100 4th Street Residential Condo Conversion S U BTT 18406 THE FOLLOWING STANDARD CONDITIONS APPLY TO THIS PROJECT. FSC-1 Public and Private Water Supply (Existing must be maintained) FSC-2 Fire Flow (Existing must be maintained) FSC-4 Requirement for Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems (if existing it must be • maintained) FSC-5 Fire Alarm System (if existing must be maintained) FSC-6 Fire District Site Access (Existing must be maintained as shown below) Fire District access roadways include public roads, streets and highways, as well as private roads, streets drive aisles and/or designated fire lanes Please reference the RCFPD Fire Department Access -Fire Lanes Standard #9-7 1 Location of Access. All portions of the structures 1 S' story exterior wall shall be located within 150-feet of Fire District vehicle access, measure on an approved route around the exterior of the building Landscaped areas, unpaved changes in elevation, gates and fences are deemed obstructions 2. Specifications for private Fire District access roadways per the RCFPD Standards are. a The minimum unobstructed width is 26-feet. b The maximum inside turn radius shall be 20-feet c The minimum outside turn radius shall be 46-feet d The minimum radius for cul-de-sacs is 45-feet A-13 e The minimum vertical clearance is 14-feet, 6-inches f At any private entry median, the minimum width of traffic lanes shall be 20-feet on each side. g The angle of departure and approach shall not exceed 9-degrees or 20 percent h The maximum grade of the driving surface shall not exceed 12%. Support a minimum load of 70,000 pounds gross vehicle weight (GVW) Trees and shrubs planted adjacent to the fire lane shall be kept trimmed to a minimum of 14-feet, 6-inches from the ground up Vegetation shall not be allowed to obstruct Fire Department apparatus. 3. Access Doorways: Approved doorways, accessible without the use of a ladder, shall be provided in accordance with the 2001 California Building Code, Fire and/or any other applicable standards. 4. Access Walkways Hardscaped access walkways shall be provided from the fire apparatus access road to all required building exterior openings 5. Residential gates if installed across Fire District access roads shall be installed in accordance with RCFPD Residential Gate Standard #9-1 The following design requirements apply: a Prior to the fabrication and installation of the gates, plans are required to be submitted to Fire Construction Services (FCS) for approval. Upon the completion of the installation and before placing the gates in service, inspection and final acceptance must be requested from FCS b Gates must slide open horizontally or swing inward. c Gates may be motorized or manual. d When fully open, the minimum clearance dimension of drive access shall be 20 feet e Manual gates must be equipped with a RCFPD lock available at the Fire Safety Office for $20 00 f Motorized gates must open at the rate of one-foot per second. g The motorized gate actuation mechanism must be equipped with a manual override device and afail-safe or battery backup feature to open the gate or release the locking Mechanism in case of power failure or mechanical malfunction h Motorized gates shall be equipped with a Knox override key switch. The switch must be installed outside the gate in a visible and unobstructed location For motorized gates, a traffic loop device must be installed to allow exiting from the complex If traffic pre-emption devices (TPD) are to be installed, the device, location and operation must be approved by the Fire Chief prior to installation. Bi-directional 2 • • A-14 or multiple sensors may be required due to complexity of the various entry configurations. 6 Fire Lane Identification: Red curbing and/or signage shall identify the fire lanes. A site plan illustrating the proposed delineation that meets the minimum Fire District standards shall be included in the architectural plans submitted to B&S for approval. FSC-10 Occupancy and Hazard Control Permits Listed are those Fire Code permits commonly associated with the business operations and/or building construction. Plan check submittal is required with the permit application for approval of the permit, field inspection is required prior to permit issuance General Use Permit shall be required for any activity or operation not specifically described below, which in the judgment of the Fire Chief is likely to produce conditions that may be hazardous to life or property. Compressed Gases Public Assembly Flammable and Combustible Liquids Hazardous Materials Tents, Canopies and/or Air Supported Structures Liquefied Petroleum Gases FSC-12 Hazardous Materials -Submittal to Fire Construction Services Plans shall be submitted and approved prior to construction of buildings and/or the installation of equipment designed to store, use or dispense hazardous materials in accordance with the 2001 California Building, Fire, Mechanical, Plumbing, Electrical Codes, RCFPD Ordinances FD15 and • FD39 and other implemented and/or adopted standards FSC-13 Alternate Method Application Fire Construction Services staff and the Fire Marshal will review all requests for alternate method, when submitted. The request must be submitted on the Fire District "Application for Alternate Method" form along with supporting documents and payment of the $92 review fee. FCS-14 Map Recordation RECIPROCAL AGREEMENTS for Fire Department Emergency Access and Water Supply are required on this project. The project appears to be located on a property that is being subdivided. A reciprocal agreement is required to be recorded between property owners. Reciprocal access agreement -Please provide a permanent access agreement between the owners granting irrevocable and anon-exclusive easement, favoring the Fire District to gain access to the subject property The agreement shall include a statement that no obstruction, gate, fence, building or other structure shall be placed within the dedicated access, without Fire Department approval. The agreement shall have provisions for emergency situations and the assessing of cost recovery to the property by the fire District. Reciprocal water covenant -Please provide a permanent maintenance and service covenant between the owners granting an irrevocable and non-exclusive easement, favoring the Fire District for the purpose of accessing and maintaining the private water mains, valves and fire hydrants (fire protection systems facilities in general) The covenant shall have provisions for emergency situations and the assessing of cost recovery to the property by the fire District. 3 A-15 The agreement shall be recorded with the County of San Bernardino Recorders Office. The Fire Construction Services Unit shall approve the agreement prior to recordation. The recorded agreement shall include a copy of the site plan. The agreement shall be recorded with the County of San Bernardino, Recorders Office The Fire Construction Services Unit shall approve the agreement, prior to recordation FCS-16 Posting of Addresses The address of the units, the designation of the buildings, the site address monument and the site directory must be posted as dictated by the fire inspector. • • 4 A•16 2 _ ~~ `. ~:,5 ~.~ f ~, F~ - ~; .~, _~. ,_ _ -; T II I C I T Y O F RANCHO C U C A M O N G A, Staff Report DATE: June 27, 2007 TO. Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: James R. Troyer, AICP, Planning Director BY' Vance Pomeroy, Contract Planner SUBJECT: TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18485 - JP MORGAN REAL ESTATE ASSET MGMT -Condominium Conversion to create 260 Residential Condominium units located in the Mixed Use/Retail Industrial District (Subarea 18) at 11201 5th Street. The project qualifies as a Class 1 categorical exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15301, Existing Facilities APN 0210-082-63 PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION • A Project Density 236 Units on 11 1 acres; 21.3 dwelling units per acre B. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning. North - Apartment units; Mixed Use/Retail Industrial District (Subarea 18) South - Apartment units; Mixed Use/Retail Industrial District (Subarea 18) East - Apartment units, Mixed Use/Retail Industrial District (Subarea 18) West - Golf Course, Open Space Industrial District (Subarea 18) C. General Plan Designations Project Site - Mixed Use, General Dynamics Specific Plan North - Mixed Use, General Dynamics Specific Plan South - Mixed Use, General Dynamics Specific Plan East - Mixed Use, General Dynamics Specific Plan West - Open Space, General Dynamics Specific Plan D. Site Characteristics The subject property is fully developed with 236 residential apartment units with complete site improvements and a surrounding infrastructure. ANALYSIS. A General The project site was completed in 2003 as part of the Fairway Palms Apartments, part of a 496-unit development The conversion to condominiums will not alter the physical appearance of the site All required tenant notification under the • Subdivision Map Act has been fulfilled for filing this request to convert ITEM B PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTT18485 - JP MORGAN REAL ESTATE ASSET MANAGEMENT June 27, 2007 Page 2 B. Design Review Committee. The Design Review Committee recommended approval of the project on May 15, 2007. C. Technical Review Committee. The Technical Review Committee recommended approval of the project as presented. D. Environmental Assessment The Planning Department Staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines. The project qualifies under as a Class 1 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15301, Existing Facilities, because the buildings are existing and the use (residential) will not change, and there is no substantial evidence that the project may have a significant effect on the environment CORRESPONDENCE This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 660-foot radius of the project site RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18485 through the adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval with Conditions Respectfu-ly submitted, Jam R Troyer, AICP Planning Director JRT:VP/ge Attachments: Exhibit A -Tentative Tract Map Exhibit B -Site Utilization/Aerial Map Exhibit C -Site Plan Exhibit D -Design Review Action Agenda May 15, 2007 Draft Resolution of Approval for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18485 • • B-2 • ~ ~ ~g~e ~ BB2~ 8~ ~ u _ ~3 ~5 ~h g~ ~s ~8hs r 6 8yrv ~ B~ ~ a a ~ ~7 ~ ~~ r key ~~ ~Cn ~g '~ i ~ E. 2 W ~Y e r. '~` F P ~~ ~ ~pW ~ @6 ~3~ m ~~~~~ 6~ o g>~~g~~~~eS?e~~e V gFy; O $~ O ~e~~Ets~~a ~ ~ ¢ ~~~~I y >_~: Z ~a Y ~~ a ~~~ ~~ • L 3~V7d M31n .(6'M?Ildj 1 ~ Cr ~l ~ L NL1i~1L~~ Lil O ,1 C~ ~ S ~~>~~~ ' ~~~ 1 LLl 1 ~ 1 0.L1 ~ ~~ ~ ~~ f LLl ~ W H h ~ w . w.w Z ,.,,..,~,m J EXHiBl1' A LLl ~n l ~~ Cl t`L~ 11 1 ,ltl~l LL `~ Z~`~4~ y LL Zl~a .~ ~) B-3 e m `,~3a W N_ [~ 0 W "< ~ O ¢ K ~ U a' z> fg Q a -« rv~ « - Y - ~ FF 2 y ~ eh" '^ ~~+~ ~ H W m ~ ~ 3 ~ a ~~`", O ~ - _~I 1- ~ O ~~rv ~ ~. 40 Wme G1 a o~ ~ a.g~s ~ ~~ Wao ~ oiZe ~ ~ ° / y~ Q vy Z ~ ~' O s ~~ = y ~ ~ a ~~ ~ ¢ ~a¢"a2~ ~ W ~ Z V 0~ 0 ~ O~ ~ a oaW a ~ ~ a ~ ~ =„~ 3 ~ ~ ~ - Z h} , ~~ N L~ l 1 ~ ~~ Z L1 ~~ o ~~ i LLl L) T t llLl~~ ` l ~ l :~ ~~ 1 LLl EXHIBIT B B_4 lZlZ6 NIN210~I1VJ 'OJ314 Nb'S ooz # Suns 'asnoH~ow o~ss 'JNI lVi1N3aIS3?1 a131~211b'~ ~dW210~f1VJ 'dJNOWVJn~ OH~NVb 1332LLS H1S lOZll S1N3W121~dd~' SWldd Jl~dM211t/~ l~~~y § m i • ^`~~ ~ ma3 ~~~~ ~ ~ e N < ~ ~ ~ a ^^ ~ ~~ Ag~- ~ ~ ~ gq H~~ u• s d( ~ - ~ 2~ oa5-444 ~ ~ ~ E R ~ ~ F~~...««8o61L&°' _~d q 1g q! ~Wf ~di A3AYF ii $d 6~` ~~i5i5~3i~sEi53~ e ~ ~ M @+ ° ~g 6 5 S @ @ c € e c ~ ,~~ V u.us i F QQ ~ 5 ° ~ ~ ~, pp ~ ~ , ,. ; ~ ~~ ~ ~~ygyg ,yY7i ~ $!9 ~ Yks~ qg 6 ~ g26e E; ~~ Y FY ~ ~", ~ Q ~ ~ ~ gg~ gg gg iii @i ~~ 9e ~;e€ ~e Y~ 3 ~~ ~~8 @~ [ ~$ ! sb3 ~ 3 ~ [ I! ~ @ _ . ~ ~ E ~ ~ ~Sj ~~ Y E ~ ®,~~'' ®.~o . ~~~ ~ I ~ I IOOOo ~~ . ~~ i g ~ `~ ~i s ~~ .° ~- + ~~ ~ 3 ~ ~ ~ J W ~ ~ U ~ \ Q ~@ac ~~~~~~ I ;' _, ` ~ c ~' ~4, ^~ r ~~~~ IF p ~@~1 ' 'oF§~:R$~$A .`'. $e^?S Yg S$~°_F~L g~$~°-x &~G.-°.AkgAS °~Ee«Apj `1 _- 6~K1 °.~j .... ..._ - s~ __^ _ -. _ •f ^__.. __ _. +1"5: "" 9$ 'e BSS ' [$ $$ a :s __ - x ~ ^ ;sSA Ej4 ...xx~ $ 3~~ 6 -^:s!!~_ x~' ~ "~ YF ~~~ ~3 p@ I~ a gz ~ 33333, k€E , 4 idS0.6 44t is ' ~ 38 a"a :~ t~ssa ~~=a~~ ~ $a~~i a,€s`s ~ ~#~~ ~d~ !~ ~ ~i=~l ~ ~g~` d~ ~~d~~• ~ i .1 ~ ~• A a ! ~ i i ~ ` i n b 'w ;.te $ Z 5i ~~ ~ J I qq w C~ naa ~~ S U O ___ U W F I - C< N vv~ a"a ¢ d S ~~ S E ~ ~\, W y `-4~as ~ Y ~ •`. { ~ gq fs i`: Y Q ~ PE qgqg' 7 .BQY qqC¢ gg ty°~@S ~ ii~g~ 4~~1i~4§ ~a~ ``~~~~ a q3y ~ k6! ~e~p6-~@EQ pS°d °¢pS.S ggCf6 p6p ppp W 'gFs~~~si~s~a5FY~S~@@~ :g r ~~ ~ LL ~ "~~ p \\\sY6 5~~8 z d J Y 5 C. i ~ ~~\u is~E~-.;Lsa~ ~^6g3_''~Fb 'sds~ '~°SS~ 'IIV 4y $~~yyFy\. ~ O y s$° e~ $61 zeod~~Y. Lt@~a@Y••s fCE 5 &fie^c'<.44 6EsPYa. s3e~=: P x yg•~$€;e~ ~ ~e PSC~° eY ePib~Ffi Ca°e.5 ~~ aGSgd-~.~&3- Z BIEe~~'~G ~fr 5sS ;~ rsFy f ~csib. e•EB:~ <~ ;qf€_ ~'b~ s ~ 6F ~~•"6~ I 3.e'~0®6~~E~zs $F•c-'fa d$;i} ~i ~s Eav s8E Sry EE [ ' Sy: 3Rg .b~b ~i ~i r:sg i $~ze S'Y YSS_£ mj 3fiE~a°6~ 'fr.10~n5 ~~Ef;.{„E ~~$?5°~fifi 'F Z~K nF e•.~Shcfi{ °~~=a $~~ ° sY~a aG~ `6@~: ~$x'~2 t•t-4 i, °YYLS 5. N~ ~a°ex48 o,E n° x383 Pais &.3°„ XHIBIT C ~ nc@ ~. ! h~ ~% 0 1 ~. ' aaa _ ~X ~ 'Y:! f ~~~ ~_, ~~ ~a •\•~~ ail ~' 317 \\PkCEh ' ~' ~ 6= ~F~~s~ E~' 3•~~'asl ifc°~ba r~fi.f :~ o`•Es=E~ ~~ 9 isY ^~,~i'e st~e,.~ 6sn6€E< g.°3e ~ps_.§ ~Bko- y°o 3 5 ±~d.E~, \~A 'a ~Z n6iggEo Y~6~ ioE~QS^ ~~ § 6_'.B spa i~ ~g3~t b~~§ ~.{fr~Yfi °6E°= 4Fgs°e `i°f[4~ pppp ° e ~ :. SF° # fb ~~°f 6~° ids `° Ca P `g:a€:~ ~I $ ~;;~®€e~ ~ p~Ic~~e aE~~e ~sggm ^~'8E~@a Sys !•$ 6 '°~' P~ taFSdY - E1=3< fEa ~b 5€5ss e~1~ $ ~~€-°~s§ $ae$l~9~ ;t;=5 4~~~<;e®"s.,Yp$g £$q° ?a??ES~~yEfi~ ;lss~";$ Be° g°ry~~~~ gg~ ~a~s~, ~FeE~€~3yF~s° ~y@ fis~ga7 @Y9rR. B• .~ao~ ~l ^e~~§fr5 a 6E $"p'EO$eY d 4~a ..5g.u°e=;-ti- ° ~~O' fi 5• 99{{ ~:db-< Y- a' E5 Y~8~£ tl -82 oN53A381 E'C°~~ fi G~ ~: ep 6 ~Z°<.'b §'3 e$ tl~ l ~ B-5 6 6 <~ 8 CONSENT • DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 7:10 p.m Vance Pomeroy May 15, 2007 TRACT MAP AND ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW SUBTT18485 - JP MORGAN REAL ESTATE ASSET MANAGEMENT -Condominium conversion to create 236 residential condominium units at 11201 5th Street - APN• 0210-082-63 Design Parameters• This request is to convert the existing 236-unit apartment complex into 236 residential condominium units The existing apartments were completed m 2003 as the Ironwood Apartments, part of a 496-unit development. The property is located in the Industrial District Subarea 18, Planning Area VI, which permits multiple-family dwellings. All condominium notification and tenant requirements under the Subdivision Map Act have been fulfilled for filing this request to convert Staff Comments Maior Issues. The following design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this project: 1 No mayor planning or zoning issues have been identified by staff. Policy Issues• The following items are a matter of Planning Commission policy and should be incorporated into the project design without discussion: 1. The project will be required to conform to the applicable Building and Fire Code requirements at the time of plan check. Staff Recommendation' Staff recommends that the Committee recommend approval of this request to the Planning Commission Design Review Committee Action• Members Present: Munoz, Stewart, and Diaz Staff Planner Vance Pomeroy The Committee recommended approval of the project to the Planning Commission as presented L EXHIBIT D B-6 • RESOLUTION NO 07-40 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18485, A SUBDIVISION FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES OF 236 UNITS INTO 236 RESIDENTIAL CONDOMINIUMS ON 11.1 ACRES OF LAND IN THE MIXED USE/RESIDENTIAL (SUBAREAI8), LOCATED AT 11201 5TH STREET, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN• 0210-082-63 A. Recitals. 1. JP Morgan Real Estate Asset Management filed an application for the approval of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18485, as described in the title of this Resolution Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Tentative Tract Map request is referred to as "the application " 2. On the 27th day of June 2007, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred B. Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on June 27, 2007, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to the property located at 11201 5th Street on an irregular lot of 11.1 acres and is presently improved with 236 apartment units, and b The property to the north of the subject site is residential, the property to the south consists is residential, the property to the east is residential, and the property to the west is a golf course; and c. The property is an improved with an existing residential use from 2003 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a That the Tentative Tract Map is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable specific plans; and b. The design or improvements of the Tentative Tract Map is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable specific plans; and c. The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed; and B-7 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 07-40 SUBTT18485 - JP MORGAN REAL ESTATE ASSET MANAGEMENT June 27, 2007 Page 2 d The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable intury to humans and wildlife or their habitat; and e. The Tentative Tract Map is not likely to cause serious public health problems, and f The design of the Tentative Tract Map will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. 4 The Planning Department Staff has determined that the protect is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines. The protect qualifies under the Class 1 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15301 Existing Facilities because the buildings are existing and the use (residential) will not change. In addition, there is no substantial evidence that the protect may have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Planning Department's determination of exemption, and based on its own independent tudgment, concurs in the staff's determination of exemption. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subtect to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Planning Department 1) The protect will be required to meet applicable Building and Fire Code requirements at the time of plan check. Engmeennq Department 1) The final Tentative Tract Map shall be processed for approval and shall be recorded prior to issuance of Building Permits. a) Plan check/processing fee will be determined at the time of plan check submittal 6 The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 27TH DAY OF JUNE 2007. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY. ATTEST• Pam Stewart, Chairman James R Troyer, AICP, Secretary I, James R Troyer, AICP, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 27th day of June 2007, by the following vote-to-wit B-8 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 07-40 SUBTT18485 - JP MORGAN REAL ESTATE ASSET MANAGEMENT June 27, 2007 Page 3 AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES. COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: • • B-9 j. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18485 SUBJECT: TENTATIVE TRACT MAP FOR CONDOMINIUM CONVERSION APPLICANT: J P. MORGAN REAL ESTATE ASSET MANAGEMENT LOCATION: 11201 5TH STREET - APN~ 0210-082-63 ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YDUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: General Requirements The appllcant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, Its agents, officers, or employees, because of the Issuance of such approval, or In the alternative, to relinquish such approval The appllcant shall reimburse the City, Its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, Its agents, officers, or employees maybe required by a court to pay as a result of such action The Clty may, at Its sole discretion, participate at Its own expense In the defense of any such actlon but such participation shall not relieve appllcant of his obligations under this condition 2 Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No 07-40, Standard Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be Included on the plans (full size) The sheet(s) are for Information only to all parties Involved In the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect 3 The appllcant shall be required to pay any applicable Flsh and Game fees as shown below The project planner well confirm which fees apply to this project All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to the Planning Commission or Planning Director hearing a) Notice of Exemption - $50 X b) Notice of Determination - $50 c) Mitigated/Negative Declaration - $ 1,850 d) Environmental Impact Report - $2,550 _ • I \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2007 Res & Stf Rpt\SUBTT18485StdCond 6-27 doc Completion Date -/-/- -/-/- -/-/ B-10 Protect No SUBTT18485 Completion Date B. Time Limits 1 This tentative tract map shall expire, unless extended by the Planning Commission, unless a _/_/_ i complete final map is filed with the City Engineer within 3 years from the date of the approval C. Site Development 1 The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include _/_/_ site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, Development Code regulations, and the General Dynamics Specific Plan 2 Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions _/_/_ of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director 3. Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Building Code and _/_/_ State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Department to show compliance The buildings shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy 4 Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be _/_/_ submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits 5 All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for _/_/_ consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first 6 Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all _/_/_ other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Pians in effect at the time of building permit issuance 7 All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, _/_/_ including proper illumination 8. The Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) and Articles of Incorporation of the _/_/_ Homeowners' Association are subfect to the approval of the Planning and Engineering Departments and the City Attorney They shall be recorded concurrently with the Final Map or prior to the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first A recorded copy shall be provided to the City Engineer The Homeowners' Association shall submit to the Planning Department a list of the name and address of their officers on or before January 1 of each and every year and whenever said information changes 9 All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property _/_/_ owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for Planning Director and City Engineer review and approved prior to the issuance of building permits D. Landscaping 1 For multi-family residential and non-residential development, property owners are responsible for _/_/_ the continual maintenance of all landscaped areas on-site, as well as contiguous planted areas within the public right-of-way All landscaped areas shall be kept free from weeds and debris and maintained in healthy and thriving condition, and shall receive regular pruning, fertilizing, mowing, and trimming Any damaged, dead, diseased, or decaying plant material shall be replaced within 30 days from the date of damage 2 \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2007 Res & Stf Rpt\SUBTT18485StdCond 6-27 doc B-11 Project No SUBTT18485 Completion Date APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DEPARTMENT, FIRE PROTECTION ~LANNING SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING ONDITIONS: SEE ATTACHED 3 I \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2007 Res & Stf Rpt\SUBTT18485StdCond 6-27 doc B-12 { ~ ~a~o~~~t Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District C ~ Fire Construction Services ~- STANDARD CONDITIONS February 26, 2007 Fairway Palms Apartments 11201 5th St. Residential Condo Conversion S U BTT18485 THE FOLLOWING STANDARD CONDITIONS APPLY TO THIS PROJECT. FSC-1 Public and Private Water Supply (Existing must be maintained) FSC-2 Fire Flow (Existing must be maintained) FSC-4 Requirement for Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems (if existing it must be maintained) FSC-5 Fire Alarm System (if existing must be maintained) • FSC-6 Fire District Site Access (Existing must be maintained as shown below) Fire District access roadways include public roads, streets and highways, as well as private roads, streets drive aisles and/or designated fire lanes. Please reference the RCFPD Fire Department Access - Fire Lanes Standard #9-7 1. Location of Access. All portions of the structures 1St story exterior wall shall be located within 150-feet of Fire District vehicle access, measure on an approved route around the exterior of the building Landscaped areas, unpaved changes in elevation, gates and fences are deemed obstructions. 2 Specifications for private Fire District access roadways per the RCFPD Standards are: a. The minimum unobstructed width is 26-feet b. The maximum inside turn radius shall be 20-feet. c The minimum outside turn radius shall be 46-feet. d The minimum radius for cul-de-sacs is 45-feet. e. The minimum vertical clearance is 14-feet, 6-inches 1 B•13 f. At any private entry median, the minimum width of traffic lanes shall be 20-feet on each side. g. The angle of departure and approach shall not exceed 9-degrees or 20 percent. h. The maximum grade of the driving surface shall not exceed 12%. Support a minimum load of 70,000 pounds gross vehicle weight (GVW) Trees and shrubs planted adjacent to the fire lane shall be kept trimmed to a minimum of 14-feet, 6-inches from the ground up. Vegetation shall not be allowed to obstruct Fire Department apparatus 3. Access Doorways Approved doorways, accessible without the use of a ladder, shall be provided in accordance with the 2001 California Building Code, Fire and/or any other applicable standards. 4. Access Walkways Hardscaped access walkways shall be provided from the fire apparatus access road to all required building exterior openings 5. Residential gates if installed across Fire District access roads shall be installed in accordance with RCFPD Residential Gate Standard #9-1 The following design requirements apply. a. Prior to the fabrication and installation of the gates, plans are required to be submitted to Fire Construction Services (FCS) for approval. Upon the completion of the installation and before placing the gates in service, inspection and final acceptance must be requested from FCS • b. Gates must slide open horizontally or swing inward c. Gates may be motorized or manual. d When fully open, the minimum clearance dimension of drive access shall be 20 feet. e. Manual gates must be equipped with a RCFPD lock available at the Fire Safety Office for $20 00 f. Motorized gates must open at the rate of one-foot per second g. The motorized gate actuation mechanism must be equipped with a manual override device and afail-safe or battery backup feature to open the gate or release the locking Mechanism in case of power failure or mechanical malfunction h. Motorized gates shall be equipped with a Knox override key switch The switch must be installed outside the gate in a visible and unobstructed location For motorized gates, a traffic loop device must be installed to allow exiting from the complex If traffic pre-emption devices (TPD) are to be installed, the device, location and operation must be approved by the Fire Chief prior to installation. Bi-directional or multiple sensors may be required due to complexity of the various entry configurations • 2 B-14 6. Fire Lane Identification. Red curbing and/or signage shall identify the fire lanes. A site plan illustrating the proposed delineation that meets the minimum Fire District standards shall be included in the architectural plans submitted to B&S for approval. FSC-10 Occupancy and Hazard Control Permits Listed are those Fire Code permits commonly associated with the business operations and/or building construction Plan check submittal is required with the permit application for approval of the permit; field inspection is required prior to permit issuance General Use Permit shall be required for any activity or operation not specifically described below, which m the judgment of the Fire Chief is likely to produce conditions that may be hazardous to life or property. Compressed Gases Public Assembly Flammable and Combustible Liquids Hazardous Materials Tents, Canopies and/or Air Supported Structures Liquefied Petroleum Gases FSC-12 Hazardous Materials -Submittal to Fire Construction Services Plans shall be submitted and approved prior to construction of buildings and/or the installation of equipment designed to store, use or dispense hazardous materials in accordance with the 2001 California Building, Fire, Mechanical, Plumbing, Electrical Codes, RCFPD Ordinances FD15 and FD39 and other implemented and/or adopted standards FSC-13 Alternate Method Application Fire Construction Services staff and the Fire Marshal will review all requests for alternate method, when submitted The request must be submitted on the Fire District "Application for Alternate Method" form along with supporting documents and payment of the $92 review fee FCS-14 Map Recordation RECIPROCAL AGREEMENTS for Fire Department Emergency Access and Water Supply are required on this project. The project appears to be located on a property that is being subdivided. A reciprocal agreement is required to be recorded between property owners. Reciprocal access agreement -Please provide a permanent access agreement between the owners granting irrevocable and anon-exclusive easement, favoring the Fire District to gain access to the subject property. The agreement shall include a statement that no obstruction, gate, fence, building or other structure shall be placed within the dedicated access, without Fire Department approval. The agreement shall have provisions for emergency situations and the assessing of cost recovery to the property by the fire District. Reciprocal water covenant -Please provide a permanent maintenance and service covenant between the owners granting an irrevocable and non-exclusive easement, favoring the Fire District for the purpose of accessing and maintaining the private water mains, valves and fire hydrants (fire protection systems facilities in general) The covenant shall have provisions for emergency situations and the assessing of cost recovery to the property by the fire District The agreement shall be recorded with the County of San Bernardino Recorders Office. The Fire Construction Services Unit shall approve the agreement prior to recordation. The recorded agreement shall include a copy of the site plan The agreement shall be recorded with the 3 B•15 County of San Bernardino, Recorders Office The Fire Construction Services Unit shall approve the agreement, prior to recordation FCS-16 Posting of Addresses The address of the units, the designation of the buildings, the site address monument and the site directory must be posted as dictated by the fire inspector. • • 4 B•16 ~ , F - .., ~~~ l ~f _ l 3l r _y =~' T H! C I T Y O F :. RANCHO CUCAMONGA St~f f Report DATE• June 27, 2007 TO' Chair and Members of the Planning Commission FROM. James R Troyer, AICP, Planning Director BY: Vance Pomeroy, Contract Planner SUBJECT' ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2006-00223 -ARBORS AT ROUTE 66, LLC - A request to change the land use designation for four parcels on Red Hill Country Club Drive from Open Space to Mixed Use to be consistent with the Mixed Use land use designation at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Grove Avenue, to add these same four parcels to Section 2 5 5 4 Western Gateway in the Bear Gulch Area, expand the range of development m the Residential classification to 87% in Table III-7, and to establish a Master Plan Overlay District for the entire 10 1 acre project site on the Land Use Plan in accordance with Section III 2 4.1 of the General Plan - APN' 0207-011-35, 36, 41, 43, 44 and 45. Related Files• Development District Amendment DRC2006-00350, Development Code Amendment DRC2007-00029, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18179, and Development Review DRC2006-00341. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT DRC2006-00350 -ARBORS AT ROUTE 66, LLC - A request to change the zoning for four parcels on Red Hill Country Club Drive from Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) to Mixed Use to be consistent with the Mixed Use zoning designation at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Grove Avenue; and establish a Master Plan Overlay District for the entire 10 1 acre project site on the Development District Map in accordance with Section 17 20 030 of the Development Code, located at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Grove Avenue -APN• 0207-011-35, 36, 41, 43, 44 and 45. Related Files• General Plan Amendment DRC2006-00223, Development Code Amendment DRC2007-00029, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18179, and Development Review DRC2006-00341. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DRC2007-00029 -ARBORS AT ROUTE 66, LLC - A request to change the table for the Bear Gulch Mixed-Use area contained in Development Code Section 17.32 020.C.3 to expand the range of development in the Residential classification to 87% and to include the "Most Case" column found in the General Plan Table III-7 -APN. 0207-011-35, 36, 41, • 43, 44 and 45 Related Files General Plan Amendment DRC2006 00223, Development District Amendment DRC2006-00350, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18179, and Development Review DRC2006-00341. ITEMS C, D, E, F, G PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2006-00223, -00341, -00350; DRC2007-00029, AND SUBTT18179 -ARBORS AT ROUTE 66, LLC June 27, 2007 Page 2 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18179 - ARBORS AT ROUTE 66, LLC -Condominium subdivision of 10 1 acres into two lots with office condominiums in one office building on Lot 1, and residential condominiums m 7 live/work units, 68 townhomes, and 23 single-family residences on Lot 2 at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Grove Avenue in the Mixed Use Zone of Subarea 1 of the Foothill Boulevard Districts. APNs 0207-011-35, 36, 41, 43, 44 and 45. Related Files: General Plan Amendment DRC2006-00223, Development District Amendment DRC2006-00350, Development Code Amendment DRC2007-00029, and Development Review DRC2006-00341 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2006-00341 - ARBORS AT ROUTE 66, LLC -Master Plan established under DRC2006-00223 and DRC2006-00350 for 10.1 acre project site with one 2-story office building, 7 live/work units, 68 town homes, and 23 single-family residences at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Grove Avenue in the Mixed Use Zone of Subarea 1 of the Foothill Boulevard Districts, including expansion of the range of development in the Residential classification to 87% in Table III-7 of the General Plan. APN. 0207-011-35, 36, 41, 43, 44, and 45 Related Files: General Plan Amendment DRC2006-00223, Development District Amendment DRC2006 00350, Development Code Amendment DRC2007-00029, and Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18179. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION' • A. Protect Density' Gross protect site area. 10.1 acres, total dwelling units: 98; Protect density. 9 7 dwelling units per acre. B. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - Golf course\City of Upland residential; Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) South - Service station, shops and restaurants; Mixed Use East - Single-family residences, Low Residential (2 to 4 dwelling units per acre) West - City of Upland; Commercial C General Plan Designations: Protect Site - Foothill Boulevard Districts (Subarea 1), Mixed Use North - City of Upland, Open Space South - Foothill Boulevard Districts (Subarea 1); Mixed Use East - Open Space West - City of Upland D. Notification Background• In response to the interest in the protect, the City Council required that this applicant provide a notification list out to a 2000 foot radius from the project site ~n lieu of the minimum of 660 feet normally required. E. Site Characteristics: The bulk of the subtect site is currently developed as a row crop agricultural field having been generally confined to raising strawberries for many years. Several agriculturally related outbuildings and a former residence take up some of the southwest portion of the site. In addition, four parcels on the easterly part of the proposed development contain several now-vacant residences Generally, the site is fairly flat with a gentle slope from the north to the south with few public improvements on the perimeter. Several trees occupy the site and are proposed for mitigated removal C,D,E,F,G 2 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2006-00223, -00341, -00350, DRC2007-00029; AND SUBTT18179 -ARBORS AT ROUTE 66, LLC June 27, 2007 Page 3 F Parking Calculations: Number of Number of Type Square Parking Spaces Spaces of Use Footage Ratio Required Provided Residential 2/unit 192 196 Guest Parking 1/4 units 25 34 Office 12,610 s.f. 1/250 s.f. 50 52 TOTALS 267 282 ANALYSIS: A. General: Traffic -The proposed project has been analyzed by the applicant's traffic engineers, and the resulting report has been reviewed and accepted by the City's Traffic Engineer. Generally, the findings of the report are that the traffic impact from the project is not significant Based on industry standards, the project will generate 799 daily trips. The project will generate 69 two-way trips in the a.m. peak hour (7 to 9 a.m.) and 82 two-way trips in the p.m peak hour (4 to 6 p.m.), both significantly less than the 250 two way trips which would trigger a Traffic Impact Analysis required under the County's Congestion Management Program. The project proposes two ingress/egress points The point along Grove Avenue is full access for all users and tenants in both the residential portion and the office portion. The point along Red Hill Country Club Drive is for emergency access only and will be gate-protected for that purpose. The traffic generated by the project will access the site through the intersection of Foothill Boulevard and Grove Avenue. The daily trips and the peak hour trips will not increase the Level of Service (LOS) grade beyond the acceptable LOS C that it operates under today Substantial concern has been voiced over the traffic impact of the project on trips that will use the local residential streets on Red Hill County Club Drive to shortcut up or down from Base Line Road The traffic analysis, based on industry standards, City-generated traffic counts from April 2006 and other information provided by the City's Traffic Engineer, shows that the project will generate an additional four a m peak-hour trips and zero p.m. peak-hour trips with a total daily traffic increase of 0.6 percent over current levels. Part of these numbers are based on the Central School District information that the district anticipates the project to generate approximately 17 (total) children (K-8), some of whom will attend Valle Vista School on Red Hill County Club Drive. Based on current information on the Central School District website, enrollment for this school site is projected to drop. • C, D, E,F,G 3 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2006-00223, -00341, -00350, DRC2007-00029; AND SUBTT18179 -ARBORS AT ROUTE 66, LLC June 27, 2007 Page 4 • The applicant instructed their traffic engineers to prepare analysis of alternate development scenarios as part of their study to demonstrate the minimal effect of the current proposal The alternate development scenarios are based on the broad range of possibilities permitted within the mix of uses anticipated in the General Plan. The following chart shows the current proposal and three alternate development scenarios Percentage Higher than Current Land Use Mix Daily Trips Proposal Current Proposal 23 single-family residences, 75 townhomes, 12,610 799 square foot general office building Current!proposal with medical office 23 single-family residences, 75 town homes, 12,610 1,130 41.4% square foot medical office Large Retail Center ` 4 10 1 , 5 4 37 6% 95,000 square foot shopping center, 25 town homes Large Medical Office 180,000 square foot medical office, 4single-family 6,541 7186 4% residences The subtect proposal would generate a much lower traffic burden on the neighboring streets than an office-heavy scenario or retail-heavy scenario encouraged by the General Plan. Traffic impacts were the overarching concern voiced at the neighborhood meetings. Various qualitative questions were posed by neighbors The Upland residents m attendance posed questions that were directed toward impacts in that city Staff has discussed these concerns with the traffic engineer for the City of Upland. The engineer indicted that the City of Upland has no significant concerns about the traffic generated by this protect. Based on the comments made by nearby residents independent of the perceived protect impacts, it appears that existing traffic conditions are causing concerns rather than the potential impacts from the subtect protect The City of Rancho Cucamonga is currently conducting the Red Hill Neighborhood Traffic Study which is designed to address these concerns The study should be completed by the end of July of this year. c: 2. Land Use Designation General Plan Amendment/Development District Amendment -The bulk of the subtect site (approximately 9 07 of the 10.1 acre total) is designated Mixed Use on the Land Use Plan of the General Plan and zoned in the Mixed Use District on the Zoning Map. The four additional parcels on the easterly portion of the site have been under common ownership (San Antonio Hospital) for some years. These parcels are designated OperS Space on the Land Use Plan of the General Plan and zoned Low Residential (2 to 4 dwelling units per acre) on the Zoning Map. The request is to amend the Land Use Plan and the Zoning Map for these four parcels, respectively, to a Mixed Use designation and the Mixed Use District to be consistent with both the general scope of the surrounding area and the protect C, D, E,F,G 4 • PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2006-00223, -00341, -00350; DRC2007-00029; AND SUBTT18179 -ARBORS AT ROUTE 66, LLC June 27, 2007 Page 5 The existing Low Residential (2 to 4 dwelling units per acre) Development District for these four parcels is not consistent with the existing Open Space Land Use designation. California Government Code Section 65860 requires that zoning be consistent with the General Plan. The description of the Open Space designation in Section 2.5 4 2 of the General Plan does not contain provisions for any residential uses, and has an explicit limitation on density with a range from zero dwelling units per acre up to only 0.1 The Open Space designation must be changed to remove this inconsistency, and the Mixed Use designation is the most appropriate. The requested change would also place these four parcels into Foothill Boulevard Districts Subarea 1 and make them a part of the Western Gate in the Bear Gulch Area found in Section 2.5 5.4 of the General Plan 3. Mixed Use -The General Pla as Mixed Use, including the documents as the Western discussion for this area in the location, the anticipated uses, expected to occur there i designates large portions of the western end of Foothill Boulevard subject site This area is known alternately in various official Foothill Corridor -Western Gateway and as Bear Gulch. The General Plan focuses on the mix of uses anticipated based on the the then-current level of commercial vitality, and the types of activity The mix of uses is shown in the following table found in the General Plan on Page III-41 TABLE III-7 WESTERN FOOTHILL CORRIDOR -WESTERN GATEWAY • Acreage Range • Average Density Estimated Percent (du/acre) "Most Case" Land Use Range Dwelling Units (du/acre) Commercial -retail, service 50% to 70% 27.5 to 38 5 acres 38.5 acres Commercial - tourist commercial, office commercial and rofessional Residential 30% to 50% 16 5 to 27.5 acres @ 16 5 acres @ 14 du/acre' 14 du/acre' 231 to 385 dwelling units 231 dwelling units TOTALS 100 percent 55 acres 55 acres ' Indicates target density not a range Actual density may increase up to 20 du/acre as long as the total of 231 dwelling units is not exceeded. As shown, the anticipated mix is skewed toward commercial uses rather than residential In addition, the broad ranges in the land use categories that were targeted for this area are noted in the General Plan to "allow a high degree of flexibility and responsiveness to the market " The implication in the General Plan, then, is that the mix of uses should be allowed to respond to the market The applicant contends that the market is such that skewing their project to the most residentially heavy side of these ranges is still far from what the market will accept and has been this way for some time Retail uses are not viable for this location considering the nearby C,D,E,F,G PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2006-00223, -00341, -00350; DRC2007-00029; AND SUBTT18179 -ARBORS AT ROUTE 66, LLC June 27, 2007 Page 6 • vacancies both m Rancho Cucamonga and Upland. The applicant also contends that the traffic impacts, if the site was developed within the General Plan ranges, would be too severe to be acceptable to the neighbors and to the City. The applicant's proposal is to expand the explicit flexibility of the range of the mix of uses for the area to allow up to 87 percent of the uses to be residential This request does not include an increase in the permitted residential density for the project site which is proposed to remain at "up to 20 dwelling units per acre" (Section 17.32.020.0.3, Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code [RCMC]). Density was an issue raised at the neighborhood meetings. Only a partial understanding of the permitted density lies in Table III-7, shown above. The pivotal feature in Table III-7 is the "Percent Range" column, not the target density. The several tables used to define the different Mixed Use areas do not incorporate a permitted density range, but a range m the mix of uses permitted The target density shown in the table is used to demonstrate the result of the range m the mix of uses. While the "Most Case" column shows an example with 231 units for the area, a "Least Case" column could very well be included that demonstrates that 385 units would fit in the area. The two regulations that define how much residential is permitted are the permitted density range ("up to 20 dwelling units per acre" (Section 17.32 020 C.3, RCMC) and the "Percent Range" column m Table III-7. A broader discussion of the problem of regulating residential density and commercial intensity in a Mixed Use setting should illuminate the reason for using both the broad density range definition in General Plan Section 2.5 5 4 and Chapter 17.32 (RCMC), and a range for each of the uses included in the mix of uses in a discretionary Master Planning situation. There are two issues one of true use mixture and the other of understanding vertical and horizontal segregation. Orthodox zoning is the segregating of relatively similar and compatible land uses into horizontally-defined districts or zones. In a Mixed Use zone, the point is at least partially to break down the traditional constrictions of orthodox zoning by allowing uses to be intermingled on a single site or within a single building The problem with encouraging this intermingling is that some regulatory standard is needed to keep the uses from producing undesirable incompatibilities usually solved through strict segregation. With this intermingling in mind, any meaningful segregation of uses must be dealt with both horizontally and vertically. When confronted with uses that are likely to be intermingled on a single site, does one set a density standard that covers the entire acreage of the site or only where the use is placed on the site? Can setting a maximum amount of the site used by one of the uses meet the intention of the Mixed Use zone? Can a standard be set that placed certain uses vertically that furthers that intention The choice of regulatory methods to use for the Mixed Use areas in Rancho Cucamonga is to provide a range for each use in the mixture, use a broad density range for the residential portion, set no limit on the floor area of the commercial portion other than whether enough parking is provided, and to provide discretionary review for each situation on a case-by-case basis to ensure that the intention of that Mixed Use area is met. 4 Master Planning -The General Plan and the Development Code both address the use of a Master Plan Overlay District as a way to attend to the unique and special characteristics of a development site to solve problems and address "issues that may not be readily resolved through conventional zoning designations or site development standards." (Section III 2 4.1, Rancho Cucamonga General Plan) C, D, E,F,G PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2006-00223, -00341, -00350, DRC2007-00029; AND SUBTT18179 -ARBORS AT ROUTE 66, LLC June 27, 2007 Page 7 The proposed project is designed to seamlessly blend the several use types together while allowing for suffiaent segregation to prevent any incompatibilities. In doing so, the applicant has been able to meet mostly all of the development standards for the applicable zones and uses However, the applicant is proposing that several development standards be relaxed in order to provide a better site design. As provided on a comprehensive comparison table (attached), the applicant is requesting the following. • Average setbacks be allowed in lieu of the required discreet setback calculation for units along Red Hill Country Club Drive and the office building at the corner. • Height limit setback for the office building in the Foothill Boulevard District Parkway designation be reduced along both Foothill Boulevard and Grove Avenue with an overall height of 40 feet • The private open space requirement for the town homes and live/work units be relaxed to allow an average calculation for the units on the ground floor and allow the upstairs space to be counted. • That the building separation measurement between the town home buildings and the driveway curb be reduced to 11 feet for both two- and three-story portions of the town home • buildings The applicant justifies the reduced setbacks, reduced separation from the driveway curbs, and the reduced ground floor open space for the town homes by explaining that the town home clusters allow a better layout design for the site. By affecting clusters of town homes, a more autonomous relationship is made for each cluster and additional open space is provided in more meaningful locations, not only in the large common open space areas, but also in the court spaces enveloped within each town home cluster. The applicant also tustifies the flexibility for the office building by noting that the siting of the building meets the overarching intent of the Foothill Boulevard-Historic Route 66 Visual Improvement Plan (VIP) This plan specifies the design requirements for the entry gateways to the City on Foothill Boulevard including various street furniture and other accents. For the Western Gateway at Grove Avenue, the plan states that this intersection "should incorporate large accent setbacks" (Section III A) The office building design provides a symmetrical L-shaped arrangement with an attractive entry toward the corner that is set back a significant distance However, by locating and arranging the building on the site to achieve the requirements of the VIP, it does require that some of the development standards be relaxed. The Design Review Committee recommended the increased height to better affect the intention of the VIP. The Master Plan Overlay District would allow such flexibility B. Design Review Committee• The Design Review Committee reviewed the protect on two occasions On March 20, 2007, the Committee accepted the conclusions of the traffic study and focused . primarily on the architectural design of the protect Additional exhibits were requested and substantial improvement on the corner treatment of the office building was required to better meet the Foothill Boulevard VIP requirements. One request was to increase the height of the corner tower element beyond the height limit as allowed under the Master Plan. The Committee also C, D, E,F,G 7 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2006-00223, -00341, -00350, DRC2007-00029, AND SUBTT18179 -ARBORS AT ROUTE 66, LLC June 27, 2007 Page 8 required that the office parking lot be able to be used by the residents during off hours and that restrictions on the type of uses allowed m the live/work units be laid out. One traffic related request the Committee made was that a protected left-turn arrow be added to the intersection for southbound Grove Avenue traffic. On the subsequent review at the May 1, 2007, meeting, staff informed the Committee that the left-turn arrow request can be made a Condition of Approval, however, since CalTrans has jurisdiction over the intersection, they will need to approve the traffic warrants necessary to include the protected arrow. The applicant provided the parking allowance and use restriction documents as well as additional section and elevation exhibits. The elevations and renderings for the office building were admired for the improvements and the Committee added recommended conditions regarding attractive security measures at the front door and restrictions on the eventual signage. The Committee concluded by stating that the rest of the Planning Commission, the City Council, and the public may be unable to properly visualize the layout of the project and would recommend that the applicant produce athree-dimensional computer generated motion picture that takes the viewer through the project to better picture the spaces within the project and the relationship between buildings on the site. The Committee recommended approval of the project. C. Technical Review Committee: The Technical Review Committee reviewed the project and recommended approval of the project D. Neighborhood Meetings: In response to the overwhelming interest m the project, the City Council required that this applicant provide a notification list out to a 2,000-foot radius. The applicant • complied and used this same list to notify the property owners of their neighborhood meetings Splitting up the hundreds of names, the applicant held three separate neighborhood meetings on March 6, March 8, and March 12, 2007 (Exhibit P). The primary issue of concern was traffic impacts, mostly Red Hill County Club Drive "cut through" traffic and Grove Avenue impacts. The applicant had their traffic engineer present at the third meeting to better explain the standard methodology used. The discussion of density was always as a corollary to the traffic concern The applicant was cordially responsive to comments. Attendees included members of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department staff, the City of Upland Planning Department staff, and senior management of San Antonio Hospital, the property owner. E Tribal Consultation and Notification In compliance with SB18, staff made the required inquiries with the California's Native American Heritage Commission and the tribes thereby identified for consultation on the requested General Plan Amendment No responses for consultation were received. A further notification at least 45 days before the City Council's hearing on this matter will also be made to these same tribes so they can comment on the General Plan Amendment F Environmental Assessment. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained m that Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures related to air quality, biological resources, cultural resources, geology and soils, hydrology and water quality, and noise, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative • Declaration. A Mitigation Monitoring Program has also been prepared to ensure implementation of, and compliance with, the mitigation measures for the project C, D, E,F,G 8 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2006-00223, -00341, -00350; DRC2007-00029, AND SUBTT18179 -ARBORS AT ROUTE 66, LLC June 27, 2007 . Page 9 CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 2,000-foot radius of the project site. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of General Plan Amendment DRC2006-00223, Development District Amendment DRC2006-00350, Development Code Amendment DRC2007-00029, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18179, and Development Review DRC2006-00341 through adoption of the attached Resolutions of Approval with conditions Respe ully submitted, ~~ Jame .Troyer, AICP Planning Director JRT:VP\ma Attachments. Exhibit A -Tentative Tract Map Exhibit B -Conceptual Grading Plan Exhibit C -Site Plan Exhibit D -Site Sections Exhibit E -Fire Department Access Plan Exhibit F -Open Space Plan Exhibit G -Office Elevations and Floor Plans Exhibit H -Single Family Elevations and Floor Plans Exhibit I - Live/VVork Cluster Elevations and Floor Plans Exhibit J - Townhome Elevations and Floor Plans Exhibit K -Conceptual Landscape Plan Exhibit L -Master Plan Comparison Chart and Narrative Exhibit M -Proposed Reciprocal Parking Declaration Exhibit N -Proposed Use Restriction Declaration Exhibit O -Applicant Neighbor Outreach Summary dated May 29, 2007 Exhibit P -Applicant Neighborhood Meetings Report dated April 19, 2007 Exhibit O -Applicant Neighborhood Meeting Attendance Roster Exhibit R -Design Review Committee Action Agenda Dated March 20, 2007 Exhibit S -Design Review Committee Action Agenda Dated May 1, 2007 Exhibit T -Traffic Daily Trip Generation Chart Exhibit U -Traffic Study Exhibit V -Computer-Generated Motion Picture Exhibit W -Initial Study Parts I and II Draft Resolution of Approval for General Plan Amendment DRC2006-00223 Draft Resolution of Approval for Development District Amendment DRC2006-00350 Draft Resolution of Approval for Development Code Amendment DRC2007-00029 Draft City Council Ordinance for Development Code Amendment DRC2007-00029 Draft Resolution of Approval for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18179 Draft Resolution of Approval for Development Review DRC2006-00341 r~ U C,D,E,F,G G PMONOA GJ O 1_ U 6 6 y0 AllO Q a a ~ m W ~ ~ w 0 Q~a~z T /-~ V W ' ~"~ V rz~w W ~"~ O ~Oq "F -Zzx~ U ~ a r ~ ray C N ~ W p ~ ~ Z °~ ~ W \J U [s7 F .zi ~~~ N ~~ U r N ~~~b~ • 5^ 1 Sb~~5 $ n,~~4 . d6b~ab a~~ f ~Q Q tl ~ ~ ~ Wb `3 a ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~p~ ~ ~~ x~ ~~ ~W&~! e5 B ~e[ W ~[°~ ¢ g ~• r~~~I ~~~p ~~~~~~~~~~ ; ~Qa ~~ ~~~~ ~. b @ ~~~~~@§~~b~y~Fa7~~~~ ~~ S -4 _N rC ~I ~ _ _ 47t L ' ~i y ' ~~ ~ ~ e e ~~ a SI ,~~ ~ w~ - -~-; ~-e : u ~~ ~~ ~ Y ~~~ ~~1 D 4 `It ~ d ~ti slat 5 ,Cs~ E s - -=-- f - - -- ~= ~ ~~ ~ ~ "aA c~ = ~ p E g % ~ ~b ~,~9~ '~~~~ ~3 9 e fl y ~ 8~e il~~~ ~~9~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ w"w:d~F i~t^~ RR_~_~' ~~~. g~~'g~ §~~~~~~ ~:~~F~~ \'~ ~¢ ~s \ y,~ ^'1 ,~ ~\\ ~i ,Oa',}~.~~ ~, ~ ,~rr~.ti' i,.~,~ Y/ LG7 ~ ~ _ ;;_i' f~ ~ I it ~~ r.:- ~ 1 ¢.f ~ i n" p ~i 2~ Jar ;~ rLsX I~ F,~~11~..i t.'7 r~i~T J~_.~pN "~ ~,,,r. Cytt`~ L ~I` i ~i ~-~~,~' r' I ~ ~~ j I_ ~ 7 _ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' r. ~ - _1 ~ ,~ ~.jl ~-~i`r- , _~~~.` 7 a ___t ~ c,,I I - - .~y ~ I ' ,, ~ 4,iM:~ c~ns~•a~~a.u5~~~ ~ ~ ~, , ~ ~ , ~ ~~ ~~ , , Ott ~ ~ ~ ~ iw s,~, ~ ~ , s,,x. ~ , ~, ;---, ~ -F~ -~ ~; ~-~ ~- ~ ~, ~ -~..; ,- ~~ - -~ - ~~ C-~ 1- a ~ o ~ - _.._ _ ~ ~_ ___ ~ I _t _ _ Lciomi i - ~ I j'.i a 8 ~e ~ ~ I ~ f ~ o b ~ ~ _ O ro~ ¢ j = W ~ 6 p V f O~< ~V. N _ e U C) ~~~~ tea. g 3 .F} ~~ 1. 3 eg~ ~~_ o > g~ t# I! yy B Vq e ~~~ s Y ~, v ~ e~ P ~ -_ ,~ / 1/ ~~ , i ~!^ ~ ~~ m t C •~~ o I ,~~ - r ~ I --- ~s, ~g,<. ,.,I r~ RS eqy~ ~$ S~ ~ gQg ~~«~iY-~ '"1 ; ~ I 'r!' ~~,4 aA^t ,<~ ' Om~ Y F~ ~l it k' `~ E ~~~~„'~ ~ ~ ~ - ~ ,;I~I - j '~I ~ ~~ ~~ ~~ X77 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I d• ~1 _ I - ~ ' I _ - - - - - - ` -- ~~I~--_~-- _-- ' °° ~ end ge anoa~ ~" '~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~~ I r~ k' 'hyy ~ L~ kt ~~ ~~ ~,C F ~~~ ~~ ~~ a ~~ Q~n ~~ o~m~~~~ :~ JGpMONOA ~ v ~~ < el p @ o _ 5~ ~. 2 a o ~ m~ -I 0 ZQ 3~tp ~~9 ~~ g ~ ~ ~-~ ~_9 ' Z i~ W-! t ' ~,` = m ~Iol I II H~•1 ~~ ~ ,r= ~ o v O~~ B a g~ g yyp ~: ~~~s~~~t'i8N6g66gYpPp6g~gip ; ~ e <N W ,:>`„~ Y ~ `` i ~ V ~, ~6~f~if6~I{P~PPPQlt Ell N1aW3ow'I^. ~,.~\\` ``` ~: - L ,t5 ~ v l' t :,w FiJT ~Io~~T ICI ~~ epl ~ l',~I \ ry ¢ -~ + '~'~ I II I ~ r Y' s'~ L t .~ ~ ~ ~ § ¢~I( Q@6g~i~ 9~Y@K Egps~~~@~~ ~ s ~~~A ~ I~ 1 t. gC ~ ; qwq 696EF~8Lle$S4i45~~~P6~~~eeee~~~ ,o n'! ; "°L:i w~l n~ 'l I cr ~ a+w• 'b ,~ ~ J v~oreeer•e:lae Eels SaoavicecE.c y'~.~~` ~~ v°T vx.T T'A'T ~ ~~ `' •0b ./~,~ \ ~ ~ v ~ i 3 7e t T , I iI ~ I ~ `W~ njb ,dr~ ._ - ~ k t - b '~ ~ ~~ ~ r , jT~ ~ ~J ~ J' _ _ ~ __ _ _ I ~ •~~~) R9 ;- ~ ' T I 1 . ~ ' 'ryi I ,/ 9. O .~._[-.,_' it - - A'I A _ 1 II y' + ~ ~~ I ~ I .3u- ~ .-:rte .I i , r `t, Laew ~ ~~~~ ~ I /i \ I ~I c 1 ~ sv°` svo +ow oro om hn " ~~ i' I I I ~ -^ ~ I i9~ „~~ o~, cw~ on 1',_ ~ p .JO ".n '~ Jo. 2 T;eb~'';n-~xn '• ~•- / "---~ i d aro-~ ' C. rJO- ro -~ w •n j ~ I sw-J ovo-J ~ r -J C ~' '\`:~~: ter-' I n I ~~ff - ^I J g x cvs nv ° i 11 / ~ ~~~ i~ ^MSy a. ri- sr -,~C ~~ ~ es .~H1 ~, ~ ='~: y~.„SI' ,` -ei ~- ~(revc.W'~ .I i I~' I' ~J / I~ .. - - - i ~ ~ of -J ~ /i ~- /, I eD{ e!a :~ a JG Je .j~ Gp tLD :io [ID ! ~°a 7~ •y. ~~ x~ I { I j i ~~ J .,7. .n ry .n •n ~~ •n •JO y ~~ ~ I g -'- e ,i ~~ _ ,-. air 1' ~ ~ I ~ ~e~€ ~ ,a%i ' { ~ Doll cw;e aw •sro o~u ti2 vo xio tloe+xlo e/. $Jt + 6 i I I ~ e ' \ -{ I ` r •w .JV •» s .JO •JO ~_°•JO r ,Life' I ~ ' ~ - f • 1 ~ ~~~ ~. 4•i 1 Gu ~ •~ is ~ L • V ;~~ 6B R ! L - _ --,, -`~.a~o AIL ~ 1 ~ ~ n Yos' ~ I~ = I Q I ~ a ua :f8 ;n '$E' I I''~~-- ,•- ~ ~ _ 'I • ~g _ _ r S i j _ 1 s w l :» rri ~~ 4~ ~° • ~p rve -J I ( 1 ~ _ A ~ ~ .' ~ - _ ~ _ 1 _~ ~ -~ ~ I' y °~ o <o , ~ ° vo ~+,s' Sy ee°•7 .` I u~~ ~' e- va- 9roi- J c m - ` ~ ~~ : ~ 1 I ~ = ~ o 4 y~ xrt'*- Qs _ -, `S, ~ {(gn//J{~I~ q '0a-J ao-? f C le -3 L 6- A I ~ to I `I + T~'bu ~ .• ni 'G it ~ i iGi ~r ~ J ~a 1 I 1 ¢yyI ~ ~ I I I ^I + 4 r~ I $; r a L d =I=~JIII pgpg 88 '` `\YY I I ly Pg^~S 's - + 1" yc •J =° ~O ~I e~d~ _ I ~ n ~ ~ ~,~f' • ~ a 1 ~-- ~ ( ,.~ a y~Y '` " _ ~ ~ ' _ '~~ ~ ~dn; 7~~ I ~~ r 'I ~d I J~ 1 ~ ~x 1 j f' L~ , e ~` ~ I ~ i I v1~ rso - ,v-*' ~9 ~#, ~ ~ s~i G~ 8~ a~ / F,j ~ I $~6 1~ ~ ~_ I I I I1 ., sxr I v =i~ q iT 4~ o yJ'y~~- ~ i 1 _,g ~ I ~ ~ yfi7:~ ~ x Q gypy t I I -'"(°u$ 17~=~~75 -~4 ~ I `7/ Sj/ - uYi ~~eF ~: '~~~~'{ ~• _- ~i i' ~~• r 3f1N3AV 3AOFi~J r ! ---' '(/''~~ - - ~ ~ " - I "i.'1~ ' ~ ~~ale~~ J ~ - ~ _ ~~ -~ - - _ o~~~E~e G~,MONOA GJ i r- u t b y0 AllO ~_~ -tzar $ I ~I ~_ ~ ~ ~ I~KI ~I irodti R ~._._ _ _ -soul- Ir ~ 'f i eroal ~ Crdn ~ --r.Err -- - Ce6ti i I ,, ~ zrotr i i _ _ ~ _ [aar ~' f '~ ~--- --e2ar a - r g. e _ E ~ YIOCI ~ I Y, . I I x I~ a gal I ~- i - o ~ c, - , ~ r1aY ~ __ rnn_ R ~ ± i- _ ~----~-- -Y~r ~ ~• ~ ' i - II6C1 R I I ~ , CaY'1 _ ~ M 2~ ~~_ ~' iwcr x Q " 1 Z ' - a i i trout O j : '. tr x I rodx~ ' U ~ I _ ~ ~ I ~ A ~ 8 ' 016x1 j I a _ I~ ~ ~~ I ~ ~ -' exn I i R I ~I I I I i- ro ' ~ 1g ~ -` ' B• ~~ c rac~ I ~; EY62t R a G~ ~ 6C6Ei I I I b '~ ~~ Riir R ~ ' ~ _ ai ~ Cro6Y~ I ~ - ~ ~~ I re6z1 R -_ --~ ~- - G' ur ~ ~ rcaE R ' I tlC82, -__-1~-, _ cut- _ i 1111 11 pp 111bY L.dn a I 6c66, 1 i I -t -' $ __ ~ _ ~i-.~, rut e I ~~ ~ y I ; CnCi '~ I ! I ~_i __ I_ ~emt. _ ~ * I - ~ 'R slmi ~~ ! ~ I rtrtl i I B $ -- I I e.ml j --- ~i ~--erR~ z I I r i axlrl'R ! a 'I s I _ ~ ea~e-e I ~ ~ I ' ----~--js-t- ~j. g~ ~ ~ , i ~f - romn-IA I ~ rta~ i F. ~ - ~ - -5 i - -rmtrl x gg rxal m 8 1 ~ Bm C UC6C1 I~ 9 I 'start 0 I I I ~ a I .xar $ U ~ YI I_ 1 61a1 ~E COa~.R _ ' I I ~ I ~ ;8 _ ~ ~~ ~ I re6x1 I,~ _ , f .~,~~_i ; Y~x; , 11, I Nq ~ ; sset- B _ ~I~1 ~~ I ~ i ~~ j Y1C21 I IB I esu g:=---r: ., ~ I~ I ~ m i P `@d d6 ' @~ Ytdxi R 1 ~ [16x1 - I it I --_~ - ex6n_,6 I " " i ' ltlUl B ~ ~ i xtlYn 3 3F _~ ~~ ~ ~~ a o m~ ~I 0o v ~ Wg~ as ~ Q W . 1! v d,,, o~~ O_S-i 8 U ~Q<~i! LL:~Fi 3 1 ',je a o z~~ 1:61; a ~ () m~~ g p ~ g ~~ V }}cc6 ? tlty ~! !fi 7~ i I e rdYl ~ pp I I _ 5 _t. srdxr R `1 ~ I I ~ Y.bt~ ~ ~ tl l I i I ~ -I ~-'~a.ttr 6 W ~ ~~ i xzurl Z S i YYetl to 0 tl _ _ ~ _~ ~@ i i-"rlax ~ U gtla , _ y16 _ _ ___ __ reex~ iR 9~ I ~e II I i. - 55 1' rzul 7 b~ ~ ~B ~~ ~ • CA Up o~9 9~9 . j U' ~ ~ i I -; - ~ - ~ ,.tl21 I" ~ I ~ I ~ nrYYl .B 1 I I. ~ ' I _ ~C I iN Z 4Ri'- q I ~ ~~ 3~ ~ B 0 • ~ Ft tlxdz~ _ I'- I ~' U ,_ --• -t- ~ e,ez, W I ~ ~ fn ~ • - ~! B t i, ~~e I ' x nrrl I I ~~ I io a - a - zwYl ~e ~4 _ _ Y06Yi ~ r zar S tl.tlti i __ p.6t1_ 8 F V --- ~-- -`--erezri ~~ i Ycex~ R Z ° , f 16Yi O ~~ ' U t 99 _,i - - oeea~ a W ~ /~ C~-__ -I-'I I v/ _'-- ~ __ ___-_ Y3dY1 1@ gp Flgr ni ~e~ r~F zeal E xy ~ ~ ~~~6@g~ ~~m~E~~ • • • GpMONOA 4J 0 s t- U 6 6 y0 AllO - ~ I - ~ •~ ' - e.xzt _~ - t - rrsz - _ ~ _ ~ exui R O -_ } nui V e~ p ~~~ xxu~ R W ~S-^ -FD62 pp Y60Y~ e a ~ ~ ~$ ~~ e uzt ooez~ s Z _~ f... U W b,xt~ 1g xF6ii Z stern R O 116ki r~^ VJ Fx.x~ R t^eex~ t x asz~ o ~~ ,~,~,, , ~Y r r' m u ~ U e~ ~ ~ ~ ~ '~ K U ~ ~ ' -~ J J yy ey ~_„ W ~~ _ ~I ; - R- g~g ~ 9 ~ ~ W 9 ~~ Z ~~I~~~ ~ w ',~, > _T ¢~ ~~ ; ,,~ o ., ~i ~ It ~~, „ .t }LL ~~ 1 Y+ a o ~ €~ " ~ i ~~ ~ au ~ ¢ W t~ H'~ F i ~ 3~3 ` ~<~S , ~:3J:i d o Q~° ~~ ~~_41, g LLO U m ~ ~ g~ gg ~! ~ 1~ 6`s xY ~~ ~. zs4 ~ • ~ p ~' e~ ~I;_ - ~, ~x s y g ', ~ ~ ~ Q aI r ~ ~ €' ~ O -- m~ R ~ f,' O iii b Ny ~ ~ 06~ ~~ ®~m~~~~ W~W yy : AA:Ia 9 6rtAA ~ ~~ P ~ Y~ Y e ~~' Y Y Y~ I S ~3 Y . tl aR i ~ tF e t S f Q t fY R 5 .. ~ ~ d- S- 4~ 4 c~°i I te 'S" n2 N ~'~ Ff ~ ~~F~ ~ R~~9 ~ ~ S. R ~, Q ~" • n ad~_ x ~ U~ E _ 'o ^d bi^ R J5 m~~Y~ py _33 FS=~ • E' ~ SEoB ~ ~ 58'°tl; ~ F ? N ~ ~ i ~ (~O (O~ y Mpg 66 P SiSi 88 S[[S S¢ [ g° R z d N n ;6e= :B sai . a - ~ gg~- PR4 ~ $ ~ ~ ~ d ~ td - mm ~ ~~ ~ ~ € a 'z~~2cw~i~ ~~5555; ~~;' ~4 ~~ d~~g) a ~[~ ~,,• W ° R o~~ ~-8 2 Y Y Y ~ ~~ ~6 i a i a ~~~ Y "° .n k ~ 6 ~ g~ o o ~i~_6i9E FzE~6€c ~E4@ 5 a5~~e ~~sPk 0:0$5 d~ .;a"g(~Q~~Q~~ $ Y ' • $3 @P C~ $~ 6 ICI ~Y4 YY9 / ~ /~ ~ I ~ ~~ • eD psp n" ~ av a ~ ~ 4 \~ i~ S 0 Y D YY Y .a . ~~ ~ y,. ~ F _ e c s i3 a fiE s _r ----- 8'rt ~~ ~~~ ~~ R\ i O 8i fR l ' R I` i B ~~ 4 1 R ai ~ [ ~ ~ ~~ €~° @ °~ ~ ~ ~;s~~$~~8 / : ~~~_ ~ 4 gigg ,, j ~ ~\ ~ e k t, I ~ r ~ ~ ~ ~- -{ ~ R i, I, ._,.. ., ~ i 6 t B _ r . ~ Y I ~ 4 kg ~ -~ ; a :: ~S I I i~ 1 - If l l I I I I x -H- - I -~~------ - ---------------------= ------~-~ a z n /e 4 § I I I~1 & - a t a t" e t a I r 1 __ I_ _~~ • - ~II - - R R t . r I [5[5]]~~ 5~4j IR I 3 is S~YS~I~~ .w 3 Aj 4 a 52 ~ ~I f I `~ ~. ~ ,. / ~_ III a Y~ c A ~~j' -~ ~~1 ll t a t i ~II ~! ~,I _ P a (~ f` a c~`i i WI ---- ; _ ~,- -,~ _ ~q. _ ~~- I ~ III •~__ t t x t- t I ~3 • I t a i pli? I I ° •aa I I~ f--- t i l 8 pp I I - Rtl 8 p~ Y § ~ I I i ° ~ I, i - - I} ~~_ j1 / I I t (u 4 4 9 p ,~ ~ ~{ ~ I f ~ I d' i I~fi..~"-14.1 A R~ ~~ b ~ 1 % a7 f~ ~ ~~ e s I ~~~:'~•1 ~ 11111 h1 .A x Ic st a ~I~ ~-.- _ 8 _ 1 ` rer_ _ I! ~~ ~ .1 ~j' t Y~e_ ~ I I ~ ~~ i~ ~ I f gS - a - s x It - rd A a @ '§ 4 ~r ,W r ° 2$ 22p J _ 4 .f _ _ _ _ _ _ ~ ~Y~ 0$6< r•l` / '~I ~ ! I 1 e c R R a a t~ ~j a° ~ror€m I - - - f ~ - - /r.c ~, 4 l / r, -J - 3s i ~ 4 a IY 'k~' s. y I ,a ,~ I ~ / ~ - - p« f - ~-1- I m _ 1 1{ I ~ ~ o° / I ~r @ > t a oar aq 9 \ ~ 6a r . I ' II S R I A ~ :o . ~ ~ ~ - ... ~ ~ I ' G ~ - r aa`IS+~ f ~ I aa~' i ~, ,I -~ 9 I _ 4 uoa ~ ^ 0 I 1 R g _ „ _ __ ~____ ~ ______________ __-_ 'I I _,_ ______ - -- - I I ~ ~- I 2 .1 I . -~ / _ ~ - - -_ 8 ~; 1 ~ ~~ I>~d . - _ _ _ ___ _ __ ___ _ ________ ___-_ ---- _ g ~ ~ ~, /' _ it ~~ '''I - .: p o. 3h O!i - n _ _ a • • q e • ~cNi~-r D tnetl % Q I Q a.azr I Z i Iwrl IA F . ~. ~ IR .rzl i t t,ca { aieYi (R I! taan i 111 t9etl IB I ,9111 ~ euel A - •ten ',. e,oCt R -heel <YYI j " CTexl tl11t1 Y anal fien R coal ~ ^ • I^ ~_ - .um 1 I Ilaxl A 4<6Y1 raczl a e%YI eftsl A - ~.ax, »ail i 8 44Y1 4tat1 iR ~Y marl a curl euxl ~u JI A_ I rccz I rcaz, ~ R I 1 iKYI I ~rcYl iA I i~ I I rcas 1 i 1.6Y1 R ~ e t? ~ Q s E ~ ~ tale ~ J~ , ~ ~ i m ~ --~- -~ 1 .aln Z Q ~ ~~5 ~~u~& O 66 i ~ % .ntl ~ U U o o~ 3rd:: _ I i ~ ~ 6 ~ asln W ~ ~ m ¢ N~ ~' q 1 i ~ ~ ~i ~ r.,u [ ~ ~ C, ~dd ~ Q ~ W .clel g5 ~ S ' rrltl . A .I~ ` l 4 ` `\ ~ p i Clltl 1 ~ i~+~ \ ~ ~ ~ ~ p , r en,et ~ f y ` ` .4 b i II 9 ,rt ` ,• I ` 1 reed ~o, ~ J~ ' i i i ~ I o I R Xh % ~"_~ ~ cr/~r Sxr ii ii I ~ I I I I ` ~ _R ~ e'aat 1 1 ___ _______ ___ JJ I I li I ~ ~ ~ R I ~ 1; 7 1 1 ~I • ~ ~,.~, x ~ 1 I ~' ~ I l i ll ~ .~.} C ~ . `~ I -" - Bear ~ ~y j I I a 2 i •YOtI ~ ~11 •• r ^rt ~ ' 9 !~ nal ~~ , \f I ~, = ~ G a ~ i 1 r II I I ~ S YteL( , ` tl, ~ i ~ I-~~ylj~~~•~ 1 1 / y UIIIIIIU } _ , ' " { .. - ' ~ - 4 Y } ~ R Y 1 ai6x1 'Y LYI E ± ,- fit ik' ~ \ _y , _ ~ y ~ ^ . 7 a,^x~ -' Yi7t "t-`av~,. ylµ~, r~ '~li p ! ~ O . yy 1 . I FI ~`X,.~. h''t ~isf•y ~.\~Ja,t~1.+]~~ ~1~, I ,T~,~'I i ~ , W ~9 I /•eYl ~~ (n . w -` ~4 i 1;y'nu II r I SG '~}" ---ecser---- ~ ro ~pj 1 dM4 X - 1 fieYl '-- ~ `; CYaxl 6 emx, ~ 1 _ ~ ~_ _ _ R _Y~ ~j C, D,E,F,G 15 + 6taa U R U YstYl Z ~ •"_, ~ 1 1 0.621 6 (n f 1 rzcxr ~ ~y I _ ~ ,g~a i ( oxxl R _ I~~ [bYl cxYl 8 >- ~I' 7 ~I / ~~i YW» ~ R ~ ~~ ~ ~ t6621 .. 6Y6Y1 ~ 1 R O °"" ~ Z •x621 O ~ s 621 {{{ ~~ b g~ ~ ~ CC6Y1 ~ ~ E O1{2Y R ~ Q' ~ ~- i { qua r L~ ~ ~ CMn $ ~ ~ ~ I i ~ ['adtl ~ ~ ~ _ r6m e ~. 6xz1 W ~ W I ~ ~ ~ w I a } 6.621 8 Cn „1 B {I 6 i~~ Cx621 1~ ~ ' ~~F ,26=, R i .~ g,-_ „ul ' ~~ ti ~F'~~ G26i1 8 e€ CR I i ~~ Ii - 2axr R R fl I 260Y1 A 0 s exzl LL LL 1 Y66:. R z O I 2~ n ~_ ~ ~' ~~ - _ ; etrn i 3 i ~~ rYal x 1 ~ !1621 T tYHI 8 ^ LV621 q ~ 3~ ~ ~ es6s a 1 `"`„ ~ ~ r66n ~ Z I r6n F .I ~ 1 _ 6.1Y( e ~' ~ CY621 sit - -; $I R _ ~ 426YI 1 ~ C 2621 6 a I ~i ' [0621 a~ _ ~ ~~ 1 ~ R 16621 a i € S ~ S S i ,.6=, ~ ~ o ~s ~~' tt621 ~ ttzl R Cn ~ 2 nn ( gg 6~ ! ~ [1621 6 tl y __ _ C ~~ ~ ~ C2621 zxri ~ ~1 ruxr s ~ ~ ,n R, 2 ; ~ TC o' h --- -----------~~ ~~ ~ .~~'Y~ `.. ) a ,,;rSW ~ Q a ~ 5 ~ z JS E $~~~ ~ L; se a U o~ W ¢ 04 ¢ 3a~9LL g ~;~ l9~~ ~ ~~K~ ~~~ g~~ Q ~o Q~e ~`~`o h„ R R '1 ~' , 9 e 1 I ~ I -~ l 1 i 1~ '`I s~r~ F~ ~J Ii~~ J~£l 1~ .~ ~~ 1 1~l ~^II'I'nI .w ~ .'A ~ UIIIIIU = - ' o , Q ~ ~ -~ - --- -~ ,_rz~ ~ Y _ i liiiiii P ~ ~ ~ ~ ^-- S . Y J {I-a~na,Yil ..Y".~~^~f~ fb\~` ..~ ~ • • • C, D, E,F,G 16 f gAeq @-~ ~ ~ Aa°a ~ 4 ARAA SxtAx ~Psa~ ~•e 6.^R~ @aa "e as iaa g Kkwyy dd-- £ 3.p^6 LtFL g aa$~ 4~4 A~~b 9 ~ 6888 b ~ 6888 ~4i ~ ~ V~~ < ~ 3 °dA A ~~ .... 5 9-S~, ~x4~, .7SY ~ 2 6 8E ~ ~C 3;55 3 Kdty w ~ i 6F66 ~ 66i6 ~~ - Y c ~ { ~ ^ ~j4 s y8 ~ 6 F a~ ~ a Q~ d ~+ ~ Y e G E ~ a~ d F~ t r~ 3~~ Q ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Q b ~ ~~ . R~ f~~ p 5 a° p~a ~'8 g[ ~~~~ ga ° ~~~5~ ~ ~ ~ e W U J~ s 3~ A ~ee ~ ~ p~ j 4A iS ' m ° 4 LgpapE ~ da 6 E~S~ ~ QpQp~ pep~ep 7pd Q ~ 'P EE~~~ u '~ 9tt 9 6g i~ ii}~ p E ` ~yb~.CB'C•~ ~ ~y Y8~¢g7~}~~~p~},y~ 2 Ea~~z 6 38' 7~ ~3~ } e~3` N ~ W O~ ~ Og c; ea 3ry6aLL e ~ B L ~ [d6° S 758~~~9'!~B r ~ ~ m ~ 10~ A~ Y ~ g ~ ~~€~ ~ ~f r~9~E ~ 4~~~~~~E~~~3~~ ~~~Bi!bQoF~ea~y's~^ 9~Y~.3~ ~ o m LL.. Q~o sad o~~ 4Q~e ~ 4-a ~~o 6 o a d_ - _ _ ~ ~ $ ~ \~~ /~ ~~ \ ``~~ tt ~ 2 pp, Y i g~ ids 5; 8 1 I r~ ' I 4 ~ \ ` / h ~ 1 ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ' , ', ~~ ~ 1 \ ~,'~ ~ '„~ ~ ec' 4~ ~ I ~ '/ ~ x ie ~i i ' - 0 i ^ ^ i~ i i ~1 / % / ~ . i ~ ~. ., 31 I -- ~ I ~ ~I I I .------ - - , n I hl a a a e ^ ^ ^ ' I Y I i ~ ~ , G ! 8 - ' 1 I ' A \ ' 1' t ~ I i I 1 ~ .. I~ x ~Yr p ~~ y ~ ~I ~I ~-,.~e~I - 1I~N: ° I ° _ a p - ~ i l ~ l t~ A a ~ ~ ,~~. ~ ~~~ ~ ~ Ii~ll ~ ~ i~I 4 I ~ ~ i i ~ III z ~ ' ` • ' I z V I ~ L, "' ~ z ~ i J / ~ ` I " f I ~ i 1 I ~ ' OI o a ! ^ I - x A R f I ^ e - - ' A ~ ~i ~~ I. a d° ~ J ~ ~ 1 ~ - - ~ 3,( i ~ ~ ' it ~~ ~~ 0 . P 1- ^ ~ G I , . ^ ~ 1 I • U ~ _ ~ u i 1 i, 'd \ A A ' ~ i t J ~ ~ A ~ Il ] ' 4 ~ b, i O u r~ ~ ~ ~ - , J ` I ~ _ -_ - ~~~ ~ - - ~ ~ I ' ^ _ - ~_ ' ^ I ,,,, U ~ , 1 ~ ~ -. iI~I' ~ _ x I i t 1o i ~ A 4 t 1'11 I `` ~ _ _ ~/ ~ Jll G` , / ,~ J w ~ _ ~ , l ~'~I~~~I~~ 1 y -- I ~ ~ - ~ I f~ r ~ '~~~ ~~~~ ~~ ~~I~I~~~ ~1~ I I ~ ~ - - ~~! - .'i I - - - - - '~~ ~ ~I~ ~ -I fl ~ -` ~ ~~ I "`~ t ~ ~ eF ,,~II I~;; ~ K,j i ~ I ~~ ga ` ~ ~$ $$ YY '.',ij1l~ 11 I It'1 1 3 v e ~ I % 7 g~ I . }~'11i ~~~~ ,I ~.I ~ y d 6 ` i cg I ~ ~~ x ~ ppp I _ e S ; 1 ~il~l~~l ~ ~ ~ ~I^ ~ I ~y ~ - _ -_ _- ~ ~~~ ' ~ O ~ ~ ' II i J J y. L °u~ ~ I 1 Oi 1 ~I / ~ ~ ~ ... - ____________ _ __ ____ I>fi~ ~ P •`~L _., _~ ..r,.;. __L. s , ___ I ~ =c -_ .. _N ~ ' ~-- ~ ~ ~ ~--- _ ~d „ Srr' '~ ~ ~' ~' 3/~OFi _ _ _ ~ '; ' ` I - ` ~~ _ _ r~ ~~J ~ 5 ~ Q n Py e b ~ e m ` z ~ ¢ E JS u~ a q L ~ a ~ Q ~ ~^ = 6s ;~a~ (n ¢°5 ¢°~ ~~ jLL ~ ~ ~ 6 ~ e t . ~ e ~ ~ ~ Z N~atl_ NSA ~R~ t. y+ yr. W ~ m g ~e ~ E ~ ~ ~ - ~ n~,,;' ~ ~S q C ~' ~ 22 e ~o ~~ R 6 ~ R o + ~ + ~~ '~ g g~ ~ ~ po, oo~ ~ a W ~a~E CC Y N m ~ ~ m m O ~g o i Q o W W z (O co„ L' ss J = ~ ~^ ; rzc W (!J Q_ 7~ 7 3ry5aLL 2 ~' Q 2 1- ~ roF ~;e l Pa oo~ Q _ ~ 4 ~ U ~' m `~~~ ~~a W o o; 4 W O Quo Q~~ ~o ~ ~ ~ ~ m ~ m o ~ ~ ~ (~ fl) V r 'F 6 § ~ m • • ~1cNi0~r Z CD L O l~L Q Z O F Q J W N Q N O C7 m Z O Q w J W C,D,E,F,G 19 1 1 J Q 5 a E U ~~~~~ ~- ;ass 3~~~LL 84p Yp N$ $'~ w °~`o ~~ W b m o • C,D,E,F,G 20 C7 • {~N~o~r I~ C,D,E,F,G 21 U Z Q w J W 0 Z 0 Q W J W Y Q T (~ w ~ ~ ~~ z `° `°" J ~ ~~ _ ~~ 7 f ~ ~ ¢~ Q LL Y W N g Nmp ,J N m8 N~A J Z ~ c~ ~~~ W cn Quo Q3a 4 3 CO J Q yU 4 E m ~~~~ ~ ~d„~ mm 66 L ~ qq 3 ~~L~ ~4~ 4~0 ~`$ ~p ~1# o } W Y Z O F Q w J W v z a w J W W T u.. O J m ~3 LL m Qa~ - J N m J Z ~ C W in Q ~ 4 U° J ~ (D (~ N ~~ ~~ 0 ¢_ `°~- ~4 ~~~~ e ~Q~e Pi y~q M e W Y Z O F Q w J W 0 z 0 a w J W • C,D,E,F,G 22 a U Ld U Q E ~~~~ p 66 L ~Q 3 «.~LL ~~~ $~o __w s7'~` e r~~~ - ~ _ l ~ ~ ~.I~ ; ~ ;~ I' ~~ I .I ~I ~I i{ ® rr I i_ I i i I A ff__ ___________________ ` ... v A __ ~ s ii 0 o ~'" i .r, B / ~ '-----------------------' O ~ ^ ~_ _t_ ___~ i 1 ~ -- __-__ $; ,~ o I~_ poi h ii 1 } ~ ~~ ~- ___ __ I QQ 'I ~• ~a9 I I _ ___ 11 - . i ~ _~~_ i i 9 / ~ ` 0 ___ ly ~ 'I~ ___ ~ ~ o z i tl y el ~ 1 Z8 ~, ~o ~ p ? ~ - • :7 ~~® F Y C,D,E,F,G 23 A a ry~ PF 0 Q m a r E ~ ~~ ~u°~.n N ss m `;~ g ~ ~ os o~ ~; 3 n..,, lal Q N i0m ~¢F ~ ~- J ~ N 0%0% gSB N~ ~4~ z ~, W zm ~ n c ~ Q ~ d ~, ~B Q !p ? ~ ~ ~ c~ _e o K w Q W p QQ ¢ Q W = ~ Q ru a C7N JN LL m F °o rn N O ^ O ! m m ~ > ~ o 3 a Q b ~ N LL ~ E ~ ~ z } N ~~ Nn ~~ - Urh r3P6n _ ~ ~3 ~ 3~6ys Z ~ w ~ mm ~ ~~ Q '~ ~ J Z ~C W ~ Q ~S Q~s ~ ~~3 ~ J W w a b e a W Y Z O H Q J W 4 • m z 0 a w J W 0 z 0 Q w J W lJ C,D,E,F,G 24 oR a. o. J x~ ~ J -~~: ________________________., ______ ___ _~_ O ~f } i 4$ 0 ~~ i F ddd ~~ t i .~ 1 F1__ R___________________ .c..cc ii < R G ~ fl I xx ~ 0 Fi 1 ~ i 1 1 I I' x ~§ n ~ pp .1________________________ Z 4b1. ~t "Y i ^ # E i C, -" ~ ~~ . ~. 4 ~uu -~ t~ ~ ~ Y m i gF • ¢.u .~~,~ o,. r ~_~- ~„~ ~4 ~ i m ~' _ ` v ~ ~ z ~ ® ~ D --- ~; ' ~ 1 } .~. } b 8 . ~ I { t iE __ 1 L`e ~rd~ll €i jeL A I a Y ~ ; N J W J Q 0] Q N '~ N LL UJ w J `~ ~ W Z ~ + J N m 3 ~ ~: Q~ Q ~ 0 ~ ¢ g W ~ f- J p z ~ W N e aq$ ~ R D CC y my y i 8 ~''- ~ (nm ~~ @ yy QYn 75 Q~s LL LL LL LL LL LL tnNN fnN N c'~ O~ N In C'l ~ Q N ~ (O N N O ~- N ~- N ~ N QQ O O N JO O LL W W W ~ W W N a~~~ ~~~z N (n Q Q Q O ~ z ~ a N Q d Q ~fp~~~~ m ~Unrv m ; 66 L Q4 3~..LL ~¢~ R~~~ K~o W b y4 S a C,D,E,°F ,G 25 + M ~ a m N ~ ~ i LL ~ J S a E ~ ~ z ~ } ~~ Wry ~ ~~ m_u„r m 66 3 J mb ~ o ~ o~ 3n~s4 U Z Q ~ Q ~' m ~ m~ ~¢~ O_ H Q ~ W J y e W (} O/#gy @ J Z ~ K ~ N O> .o$~ ~ : ~ k W fn Qd n Qm"s K~io J W W n 4 e } W Y Z O Q J W V • C Z O H Q J W • C,D,E,F,G 26 C P.c :. d Si bppn~ lN~i • - - ------------------------~ O , F -~--- - 1 -1 I [ ~i ~ ~ ~ O - I ' ~1 r I I I I ~ k s. -r ~ _~_ _ ,_~_ ____________________ I I I p~ e g •~ I i I I g ~~ :-~----------------------- d g Z li ° ~ o bbbb ~ 5 IIII I1 4 6d ~ ~ 7" _ ____ ^ C I O h II y~j^'~ 'I O~ j Sq 1 Q f~^ 4 ~ ~ l l I { 1 " ~ t 1 ~ ml __ ( I~-' ~~ ~R N W W J • ® ® ' ~I ~, ~ _. i i ~' ~ ~i ,^ Zf 0 I 91 ee I -I I ~ i _ ~~ ] oe~ ; vv a - 0 -$ r-- i® ~^ ~~ m I ~ ~e 1 ~ J ~ J QI ~ 0 M W m y V Q ~ N J "~ u- Z S J U~ gg~ a 8 § W ,p ~~ € X75" z J O N N~ „ c;~es Q ~5 ~ ~ 3~5za O O LL ~ N [tlm pp ~4@ I_ ~ O N m~ N~~ ~ ~g$ z ~ W zm ~ k~ D'--~ 4 ~ ~ ~ a` ~o a`~~ §~o w LLLLLL NNN ~ ~ N ~ M LL LL LL NNN ~ V r ~ O N lY 00 ii~ w C 0o w w m p ~~ > ,, > , , ~ N J w~ 2 W Z J m ? N ~ ~ Q Q ~ Y c O Z O C, D,E,F,G 27 • • C ~~~~~ 1.__ i} _1.__ 1 ~.__ f__ __Z_ __l_ '-t_ ~ ~ ~~ W Z - - - - ~ - - - ; v /~ V O n ~ n ~n~rn~n~~~~n~n~r~~; w J W 4 Q Z O F Q ~i J W U Z O F Q J W Z O Q ~ii J W 1 ~E~ xa o~$ W Z O F Q w J W C,D,E,F,G 28 W Z O ~- Q w J W ~ a m ~ ~ O ~ ~s ~ ~~ F ~ Q ~ ~ ^ ~ ~~ ~ 6 a ~ J ~ U g ~^ ~ L 3 ac 3~€LS W o Y W o Q m ~"4a W O m - m ~ 1 ~ N R N~~ \\\ p !pa W .°~C ~m dd11~~ ~ ~ g'~w J J Q e 3Q Rya w b Eo ID 4 0 LL Z O F Q J W C~7 O w>J W J N O J >W W J Z g Jb Z W ~j~ ~ry J ~ ~ ~~ fY] ¢ ¢5 _ ~gy I ~ NQ3tl Nm8 W O ep O~~ .D CRR ~'e J ~ Q~~~ Q~e ~ a E ~tl~$ ° es m; t~~4~S 3~$~° gn 'l S~~ w b b pIl Y o • • • C,D,E,F,G 29 • • ¢,. . ® i .f 1 . ~ I ~ O ~ I 9S 0 - _ i ~ i 1 - j ~. S -S. ~B.- 1 ; j I w ~ ~: ii 1 t ~ i ~ B- - i 11_ ~_. - ~- --, , F o,_ ~o, . h^ Cf~1~~C~ {~n~j ~ a ~ ,, ~ ~s ® c'ru `~` ~ ~` LGlta,U f, t''t~~R n' ~ t`;rr~r '~ f {I'~ ]`~~I$.~t71~y~~„i R~ ~ i J ~ O L ~ " tf 4r'CT'tT'~# ~ U *~~ ~~)~~~)~> ~f7.~~.yy~~~11~~I55~~ }T}'f j ~ I ~ . {'~ ~~ lf.~,.} y f C3v~ff ~--{{ Ih ~` i C ~4M~ ~ 7.'fti.~l..~~C y }'. F}}'•Fr };'Cl-- 1'i"y ~ } ~_lAl IxjS~~~x~ ~~~.r1 ~v{ / i~ +{•'lt+~~.t~ :I ~a f~~a C, D,E,F,G 30 J J N J W W J ch J W W J T I = Q ~' Jm ~S J °~ Z ~ m ~ c`DO m. 4 J Y ~ ~~ ~~ ° ° ~ ~~ ~ 3 0 ~ m N~ ~ z W W Jm D C@ QY~o ~'-~ Q~e w v Q a LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL N t/1 t/1 N m a (/1 41 (/1 fn to ulmi°n m °o a m o emv°~ N °m a ~ ' N ^ r ~- N CJ 0 0 0 ~ N f'J O O O Q ~ J J J N J J J ',, O '' ,, '' Z a J J W ~ Q J J J N ~ Q Q LL N O c¢7 r O Z r- O m a J Q U d Q E m ~~~~ y ~ S6 3 ~ ~:? ~q~ =a R~ w >y 4 b o • U z 0 >a J W W z 0 a W J W Y } W Y Z O F w J W C] J ~}Itp~tT € 5 m Z O F- Q w J W 0 Z O F= Q w J W C,D,E,F,G 31 LL z O F- Q w J W ~ Q a z W ~' E ~~ ~~~~~ Q ~ N Nw m;QC66 J 7~ 7 3~bY~ ~f,J O O~ w a ~ - m~ C ~°-~ ~ ~ ~,~ N ~ N ~C j ~Q}'k ~-6 ~ w G ~ Qd ~ Q~= °~o ~, ~ V w m ~ o 0 J W W J N O J >W W J ~ m 3 a Z¢ n g~ ~ rS (J U J $ o } z J ~ J ~~ m~~~~ c c ( 0 Q G J Q N N~ m e66 t;ina u. o~ o~ 3n.~LL m ~ m 1 ~ mma ~4~ ~p OQQe OE ~ ~ ~ G F- Qd~ Q~ o ~ u b tl F o • M O J W W J :7 C,D,E,F,G 32 • Y W ® O F ~a ' ~Q ~ ~ ~ Aga 9 r ag c~d1 ~~~~ 0 aJ N J Q a N ,- m 5 a co U~ E ~ J yyyyy J ~ C G W O ~ ~~ ~ tD Z O ~ c0 ~~ u =;RS6 Q ~ ~ 3r~zLL ~ ~ ¢ Q ~ O p ~ m m ~ ~R~ S ~ `1 @ n~ `1~9 ~ ~_~ z p m ~ ~,ry8 dd~~e ~ g~ ~ ~ F- c7 Q S YQ_s 3 R W ~ wU J O p N LL LL LL f/l fA Nfn LL LL LL LL (n N NN Z Q wy amnlc c°Jro°m n n 00 _ f W b O O p N J J J N 1ILL O O O J J J Q~ O Q~~~i l ~~~Z a a ~ J ~ N ~ ¢ o LL LL J O ~ J < ~ rn rn ~ O Z O m m N J W J • Ch J W W J • C,D,E,F,G 33 r ~ ~. J Y$~~ ® ~ I I 3 i 9 ~d I '~ I~( J'I~II~ i i O ~ i ~ I ~ i Yy r .~~' 1~ i ~ ' '., i > M i ~-~J I ~ A ~___ R I i i O a 1 j I - ~ ~ _ i ~i ~ ~ i IjI ' J, O -- ~ R .._ , I - i ii y i ~" i__y__ b___: ~i i ~t. u A .. >. ~o~ 5°~~ va JS ~ ~~ N N^ ~5 ~ 0 0~ ¢g i6 m mCC N 'e Na ~ C888 ~~e Q~~ Q~o U a LL LL LL LL LL LL N N N N (ll (n (n W ~°ma ~n~ o O O N 0 0 Q J y ~ ~ Q ~ N a o z o ~° ~ Q EyyF ~ ¢~~~ L Ms66 ca 3r5~y ~4~ ~`a ~p y~~e It • q 0 '~' Z 4 oA ^ e ® Z" ~ ~: t.1® r~ ® F ~: g S¢ : .~ A I i f ~ ~~ tln ~ ~~~ ~s `'~ - 0 ~ .lr, ,w~ ;+n Y f~~~ `' O X ~ ~ ri 4~t4J ,~.~1 j:4 ~~{ i a m N iO I N ~ ~ Z W Z ~ Q W ~ p ~ ~ Z O z ~ W 0] O N J W W J N J W W J c: C,D,E,F,G 34 + + N aJ N J Q b L~ U Q ~ ~ CJ ~ E r ! ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~~ss d ~" Z ~ N Nn L;~4"1 n+ : Q w ~ o~ o~ 3«fr~: Y~~~ ~ a O ~ fL Q ~4~ v I I 1 ~ ~ z p ~~ N~~ ~.a w Z~ w ~° c .°n-~ ~ 4 ~, !. I p ~ ~ L' S I I -------------------- ~ ~ ~ m Q ~ ~ Q ~ s ~ ~ 3 of ~ I { I, I w of _. ~..I J n<.R; II O m I® li ~R 'i WT ~ I ~~ ii I' { j1 ~__l ~ p rl I I II I " ~ II ~ h___ ____________________ I W Q I i i (~ U I~ I a w I ~__ I NfnN41 to Ul Nfn ~y 4 - e I i mminm rn-~.- aZ Y ~~ ~ I r°im$m wm an O~ ~ „III ~ ~ o ~ 1 e1111 ~ ~------------------------ o "o 0 0 0 o a -- ~wwwp w~u'I au Ci 5 Q~~~~ ~~ ~~ Z LL LL ~ ~ tN/1 Q Q Q f~ to • -ir _ _ 9 ~ "x qp ipQ ~~ ~l Y= w "'~ ~ 1 t I _PX_ _ I } _ ~ ~ ~~ f - ~ ~ ~ a --- ~ . 9 ~ ~} ~ 3 _ r - l sat ~ sc f,~ ~~ • ~ r a v' I I > r 17'f".~' I ~S } s n;+ ~ , I~ JV, ~t.' { r ~ ' 1V m' I ~ t >i' ''~( t ~. l I'Y t,{ ,` i y{~y{ 0 { ~ } ® S i i i I 'I C ( I r~tClL1C ICY ,Sy~C` ,~~ I I~~ ('C~< A ~`~ I+~+lµ .~ + ` f.fl .~ ya ~ n II I I rl., ~~ 1 {>C~ ~~f .'C ~ ~ I n 4 u ~} ~~ 4~~ ~ ~' t~ ~ yY'~ '1~ r]i .rF~'+ C'4cx ~;~s~,y ~ ~ , N J J M J W W J C, D, E,F,G 35 + 9 0 i ~c li ~ •_~ II ~ I~ ~'~ i lr lil ~~ __ 09. a pa ~ ~ ® ;~ i ' ~I ~ ~ y ~ f ~ 4oi ~t >rrr r r~,~d rr~irrr ri; ~ II ay';~ ~'~ ,~" ] 5]'S ~ s ~ r r~,4x ~'~i 4~ti~c~r~t ` a ~.., , ~. 7 4~4~~c,t~',ct,-t'r c~c~~}-''yt ~ o t~~ 'ch'ic ~t~,,cb~Yfc 2Cc a ~c7 4 r c v~' i A }} ? c ~ ]i`~5~~ ,3~ `f'`jy-S~ 88 . r r u r ` B. { ItF~~...5 ,1,7xif,Ct.T~ T y~ A.~r, uYA (.r " F4jr~-fir ~]'f` }' r ' . y-L~A~i r ] L O ~3_hr~]I {fir} ~[j,4.r~y.~j_U~.rib,C,,~, iii .rjr, ~ t~'[It~'~C~'~'~2,~L~ ~r~~~Yt~[~T~, tcvF rye ~iF 1 '~ ' 'r7~'; i '~~r~' .k~4"'t!"r ~. ' ~ rf ` ~ ~ f ' , 7 ]n ~r~;r ' a z . ~a y5 x 4a,~1 r~ l i f 1 f.~r,;,~~r~ ~ r r5~~c ,C n~r,ct r'~,t~lrt' ~r t~~'t~,c~r c' ~T;,; 4 ~ ~~r~~~~~ ~c ~ - `~ s~ i'}r ~ r~~ ~1 t11 ^'iT{~Il , ~ 1~ ~t / ~~yy r rrr ~~ rr / ci d 1 r I rTr lYlf l'~7rr'~lytr T~~1 .~ C, D, E,F,G 36 J W W J N J W J C7 J W w J a m ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ Ua J~ Z O z (O (0 „ ~ + m ~5 m ~~ d p ~ ¢ ¢, ~" Z ~ N6 ~'3q N z ~ m $ ~ C yRy L ~'- ~ Q a E m ~~~$ 0 S6 3ry~zs ~¢~ ~~~ ,„_n w U Q a LL LL LL f~ N r~ LL f11 LL LL LL rn f/~ N LL f!) N O C Obi a ~ m e Ot < N M r LLO ^ GOO N 0 0 0 ~ J >J> ,, J J N ~ JJ ,J, >J> W j J Z Q ¢ J LL O C7 ~ ~ ¢ Z F ~ rn m N a ~yq~o M • • • EE ~~ k ~ggS ~ ~ g ~5 3r ~`,~@ ~ ~~P 8 ~§~~ ~ `s ~°`s E~ a '< ~ ~ 3 i ~ ~ ~ W g ~ 8 ~ ~ ~ 7 ~ ~ g ~ < sa ~ ~ s 7 ~ ~~ o a ~~ ~a ~ ~~ ~ U ~a X ~ 3p `ow °o ~ ~ `~ '~, \~~ ` ~ ,~!\ i ~~ f ~' ~. ~ '~ it ~ ~ ;,~,I~ a ~~: \~,1 \' /~ y • J ~Y` 4 i --;=~.t~ I ~~ $r ~xl ~ a ~~ - ~~ __ _ ~~,,, '%.. ,nG _ ~~ -~'~~~ ~~ tit ~ ~ ~~~l~l)1i~ i ~g pl ~~ `~ ~~ p~'~(Q ~ y\j _g a ~ ~~. a '~~ ti ~~ ~i~'t~ :;j ~ ~ I~' Il~~;d ~. i, ~ ~~ ;:~ ~t~''utti: ~. ~t~~'~ ~ ~i8~r ~ f § j 1 a' k :. p --a2i 4` ~ i B I ~ ~ € a ! ] ~ yy i S ~ ~ ~ __„ i L4s%a ° I ~ ~~~ _ a C, D, E,F,G 37 i 3ffjS[ t H F~t a a E ~• a . ~ '_F A ~s ~~ e Q W W J UN z ,; ~""' F .¢] W ~S O~ ~`, ~~ ~ % ~ ` °~ V`~~ 1'" j~ ~' s~~ ~ ~` ; ` i l 1 \ ~ '~~ ~ ,~ 1 ~~ ~ a ~' --_!-~i r R z 8 ~ 4' e ~ ~ ,f ~ h ~" CT~I r;\~ ., ~z I~r~~= ~~ ~~.; O ,~L, ~~\ \\\ ~ r, ~A "' . ~ "~. ~,~;~ ~ ,~„ ~i ?,9~%i y~,,, ~ ~~- ~/ ~~~ ° ~' ~ ~. ~Y~ ~i i II ~~ i ,~ r Z Q a w a Q U ~I, Z Q J Q Z J W Q' a B .Cl ~~I a,~~=~ < +~~ x n a{.= W II a ~Fe o~ ~ ~' ~~ ~ ~ a E o ~ o 0 ~VoH C7 ~V~ .Q oar N a n w ZS ~ A ~V a O O. E., O U '~ W ~ ~ ~ S ~aH~ F W U~ w 'oma a@a~ ~>o ~m a`.°w`m D Z W W J C7 Z z 3 Y K Q Z W a 5 ¢~2 ~ s~ g SSg o~ S ~ ~9 ~ a ,~ ~ A p E ! ~ ~ ~ pp SI l P ' ~ _ _.,__ : is _ ,.~., _ x,. _ a • ~ c w ~. 7 ~ c y ' g ~ ~ !e !~ 4~ ~ ~d 9~ 0 ~ a p p ~ H 3 Eq H ~ F ~ ~ p P E p E g o w ~ ~ 3 L~ ~ ~~ ~ ;. {~ 1[ p d ~ ~ ~ R t pp ~~ ~ p ~ ~ 5 ~ ~ i w ~ Q { f~ ~~ !! i~ ~~ {3 ~~ ~: g ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 6 p g g ¢ ~ ~ ~ W 6$ F @ ~ 5 4 P {~{ ~ ~ W ' ~ d g ~ ~ ~ ~ ! ~ E~ ~ ~ ~ o E w = ~ o ' ~ ~E i~ #~ f~ ~~ ( f ~ ~t !~!! ~f as I ~~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ x 8 ~ s m ~ of ~ p 5 ~ -z `p 2Q ~ y ~c g ~!3 .ag .~3 ~4 ~ ~~ ~.x d ~~ ~~ ~9 ~8 ~J! ~~ ~~~ g ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ t8 7 t g d~5 i l l l l l ~i3g o o ~ ~~ ~~ E} J~ ~~ it ~ O ~ o ~ ~O O o O o O i ~ Z~ ~ a = ~ ~~ ~~ ?~ ~t ~~ ~~ !t ~i ~~ ~ 4 1 ,~ 1 r~ 1 is n[~' _ I J i J = 5 S 't I j 1 J 1 4~ ~~ JJ y ~ ~ ~~ !, , } ~~J ~ L ~ i?~r_ 1 Q O ~f ~~ 4 j r a 1! ~ p ~ J I f ° ~ j a C,D,E,F,G 38 a 3 0 s i z~ 6 s R o b `VA V ~~ O ~, rw~I _1 O Z Q a w a Q U N Z Q J Q Z G a a III ~~~~~ m "53' W ~°~~ i~ ~~ 8 ` ~ n o `o ~ S ~ M ~ O O i ~Uo~~'., O ~ V x .~ ox~ ~+ N 4 ~ ~ ~ N ? ~ .a +~. ~~F c u 0.1 ~°..°x ~ F ~ Pa U~ w `~ ~9 Om" ~@~o cn ~U~ 0~~~ 4 atOwm • • • aiy -' d ~F 'a ,~ 5 ~~ ~ ~ z 3 • w h I b b +.~i O w C i 0 O O N r .~ ~. ~x~t~r~ L Z U Q O 0 F- N ~ W ~ -O v = m m ~ ~ ~ cn w ao ¢ eo ¢¢ ao ¢m ch v m ma m¢ co _ ~ ~ ~ O 0 0 ~ O N R V R V _ m (D ~ W O a D O o O ' 7 O O V ' O O O O O O ~ O O •~ = 0 >~ O V N N O N a0 N W a0 O GOO O O d N _ ~ ~ ~ ~ o r- N ~ 7 ~E N ~ O ~ Ta ui ~ rn U 'm~ e' `°° °~c h E^ $ a g O o d ¢ - ~ S o r c C m v - ~ v Q Z Z ~ ,a. N ~ c ~ a~ m ~ o Q J ~ h ~ C~ C O 001 0I O ~ ~ Q a ° e o ~ ~ mo=v m ~ e J (C U 8 (6 l.ll ~ ~ L C ~ O U ~ ¢g~~ U o ~ ~ ~O 2S ~ V O d N = N O O ~ _ ~ O A . £ d ~ O O ~ Z Z ~ N O d 8 d d 0 O ~ O (p N LL ~ L d ~1 ~ H C O ~ C N ~ e ^ _ ~ N N ~ 0_ ~ ~ w •--• ~~ •~-• N W ~ ~ ~ ~ = C N (D IN ~ ~ _ M) V' f+') V ~ rL r ~- v U C. O ~ V N .~ p a O O o N ~ N fn = M v w Z ti ~ ~ rn O O x -- z x ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ m ~ U `~ ~ > a~i ¢ ¢ oo ?N~ E ` ¢ ¢ o° in J ~ Z Z ~ u~ o ~ ~ Z Z v N ~ ~ E o m $ E =° c'~ > o_ ~ ~ E ~ ~ E e a H N U ~ U ~ ~ ~ N ~ ~ CV CO ~ Q ~o r m .- A ~ .« ~ co I I Q Z W o v U ~ O [V ~ O ~ ~ x ~ r rn J LL J d V a~ ~ $ ~ V L ~ Z ~ ~;-, 3~ to a~i ¢ ¢ o o ~ ~ ~ E E z z ~ ~n ~ o ~ z z z z O N m o E o_ ~ a E O = E d r ~ m ~ ~ N ~ 3 t ~ 3 m rn ~F-~ O O ~ m ~ C7 m o ~ ~ ~' E O N V ~ ~/1 ~~ ~{ y N ~ m N ~~ U. ~ O ~ N C O O N W O p O ~ ~ = ~ a~ rnv ~ ~ m D D LL Y ~ O E E E `° i ~°°° a E E E U m c c '~ Q n ~ ~ c ~ c ~ o ~ £ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ¢ m S 3 m `c4 ~ ~ ~ N i° C, D, E,F,G 39 0 a> (Q a i cD ca d O is 0 .~ Q o Q ~ O vi U W O c 2 ~ ~ a~ a~ a~ to W co Q ~ ~ ~ a D7 'o ~~ m m o0 Q m 00 Q 00 Q m W O o 0 0 0 [n m E 0 0 0 0 0 0 o V o 0 ^ 0 -o~rn o 0 00 0 0 0 N a0 oD ~ +O„ O N O O N O N N W 0 a0 M O O d a m g O M M M O O ~ E n v~ ~ -L' O E c~ ~ d ~ ~ ~ E ~ a O m~ ~ ~ Z J Q C ~ d ^ Z ~ C`00 7 >O Q~~ m ,n ~ _ N O C 7 C ~ M Z Z Z Z Z . V ~ N~ C Q~ d. C .7 N w ~ ~ g m L ~ c LL m O U W ~ c U O c ~ ~ LL U E ~ s ami O O ~ N ~ Z M p Z Z N N O N ~ Z O~~ .~- Z O Q LL' ~j ~ N d ~ t d: d ~ ~ c ~ c O e ._ ~, " ~- ~ - y o ~~ ~° `'~' o ~° ~ Q Q Q Q Q o ~ W ~ 0 0 ~ 1~ N .'- ~ Z Z Z Z Z O 0 ~ (D I~ (D v ~ ~ N O_ N LL 01 y = Q Z ~ Q 0 _ ~ O 0 d ' ~ ~ O U ~ E E o > > a0i o co U o _ J ~ p, p, Q Z 2 N Z N O N ~ N r07 p Q Q ~ N ~ > C N ~ ~ d ~ N ~ ~ U I~ r j~ c~ ~ eC N + ~ N O ' Z Z > N Z Z Z Z Z ~ Z W ~ n- m rn = Q Q r ~ in J LL d ~ W J p in Z` =~ ~ U ~ ~ m _Z c ~, o > U .-' N ~ Z Q Z ~ - C Z N O N ~ .- Z O ~ Q = N ~ ~ y ~ M LL' C - ~ d ~ N ~ U z o ~ m ~ ~ m c a~ c c c c Z ~ a ~ c > ~ m m a~ ~a a~ a~ J m a~ m d~ z p ~ o m ~ c ~ ? ~ oQ oEQ ~ oQ OEa ~, ~~" ~ ~ ~ a' O O ~` O J N> N N O N> N~ O a~ U $ m > c O a~ > ~ x a~ W D x O W a x a~ W D x~ W o m W~ N V' N W ~ ? m ~ ? m aci o aci a ° m _ ° tO ~_ g io ~ o m ~ ~ ~ Y o` 0 (O Q U O _ Q ~ LL C C C` ~ Cn ' c c c c ° U Z U r, a a ~ ~ > 2 .n ~ ~ ~ ~ E ~ ~ ~ ~ E c ~ ° G 0 Z a ' ° ° c ~ d ~ ° m N v o ° ' `~ ~ o ° ' ~ w ~ . o LL o lL c4 C7 LL'm ~ LL' i ~ a Q2' QU - - ~ ~ a i QLL' a QU ~ C mN LL o Z 0 N N f6 d I c0 (O 0 N O Q • • C,D,E,F,G 40 • • • z F- N ~O W ~ ~ fn U ..... oo co w w w w i~ w ¢ ¢ ¢¢ ¢¢ m m O o 0 0 o f o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ U v o CO v 0 of v v o„ 0 0 a0 N ~ v 0 a0 v 0 ~ v 0 ~ co v 0 0 N O ' oo v 0 0 N O v 0 ~ v 0 ~ O r O ~ O O~ r r ~ O .^-~ r r ~` ) r .^- M r r O r O r 3 ~ ~ ~ ~ b N ~ ¢ ¢ ¢ O ¢ N ~ p, CO=~ ~ f0 N ¢ ¢ O Z Z Z cD Z ~ m ~ 0 .~ C •p N y Z Z J ~ __ tD 8 N c Q G. ~-~;LL t'i_ m 2p3~ w M M~ d g~ y C IL O ~ { ~ U d W 'p C U C U V ~ E m N LL 3~c u . O d ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ o o L ~ -'~ a ~ ¢ Q a Z Z Z z z ~ v r~ o L,E z z O ~ N J ~ d ~ E E E ~ ai L 0 ~ _ 0 E ~ r ~ ~n eo Z• y .~ ~ M I I p N ~ O _ N~ ~„~ m y C 01 w Z M ~ N^ Z - N o ¢ N Z O d OM p O ~ o N N N Q ~ w L/) _ _ ~ N N N ~ ' ' 0 _ ~ Z Y ~ '~ O O ~_ U w J G1 E O in O ~ cN7 ~ _ ~ I` M N '- O '~- O d ~ O O d d O R N ~ ¢ D ¢ ¢ ¢ O CO (O ¢ .._ ¢ N . Z Z Z N v o N Z ,~ Z W O ` ~ a 0 x r J _ ~ y W ~ ~ J ~ U Z .` ,.-. N c cn E Z Z Z N ~' M Z N O Q. N ~ O d N O Y ~ `o ~ o c S ~ ~ C ~ N ~ ~ O 3 0 3 v, ~ o~ ~ c o n m Xt Z N ~o 1= Q3 ~ Q3 ~ ~ is o E m a w. ~ p ~ ~. g ~ i d ~ 3 w 3~ a a~ m ~ ~ ~, m n 1= ~ ~ "v i U rn m ~ a _d ~ fO ~ ~ m ~ cn Q C a o w -o ~ a fA o ~ a~ a i 4 m~~ v E o~ rn v N . so rn ~ ~ - ° f ` Q o a a ~ o 0 ~ ~~ ~ ~ a m ~O Y c a ~ 3 ~ ? ~ ~ ~ = D ~ N ~ a~ ~ c a3i ~ ~ `~ ~ ~ ~ `° ~ -o ~ ~° ~ _ ~° ~ _ a`3 U' cv ~ W is iu m~~ m~ m m 3 °ui ~? ~ m a °N' a ~~ ~ x m ~~ O a n 0 M m (6 d I (6 N O .a C, D,E,F,G 41 z O n w ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ w m m x cvW Q ~ ~ O o O ~ 0 O ~ 0 O ~ 0 0 `}° O O C ~ ~ E LL o M ti 0 O ti R O Q Q ¢ Q o Q ~ Z Z Z Z N Z ` Q a U a' W O U d W ~ U LL U W O ~ d o ~ z z z z ~ z Q 0 m a a 0 .~ N ~ a; ~ E 3 ~ N O (D a m ,°y }~ ~ t ~ N N d N N lp~ ~ l C S ~ N C x x ~ O) D p - J i m N a O B~ Z Z , ~ ~ W p a ~i d ~ O ~ ~ ~ °' ` °' ~O N °' ~ v 3 m m O a v o 0 . ~a 3 ~ a?OQm ~ r i ~ .~ og W Z N c'~7 V V' O (O C U Q N '5 \° e 0 0 V C N d d C G ~ d (n I--~ U Z m W X 0 r- e-- ~ n '- C N O O F s- N M 'cY ~ CD f~ ~ N~ = Z Y ` ~ ~ d o O O ~ ~ C y O N N N p1 Y ~~ U o s ~ b m ` W .. o ~ `n ~ ~ O . N x x o N m ~ ~` C ~ ~ C d o o N p d (O C J $ dQ g 0 O` ~~ Q Q _ J Q M M dCn ~ ~ yMN ~Z Z ~ O 3 (d . O ~ ~ m O O J m ~ d C } ~ o 0 0 U 7 d n o ~ v •- o°o ~ a ~ LL ~ N ~ C J _ ~ O N N n O O) ~ N C d Y O ~ fn N C E 3 Cn O N 3 -O N C O c0 O) L 'O N O d - ~ - ~ CJ ~ QQQQoZS ~ Q N C Z`a ~ N G O N N d C~ ~ ~ °c3 Z Z Z Z N ... Z C O 3 ~ ~ O O ca n d o N 0 ~ ¢a 3 p ~ ~ U O = th ~ J O Q O d W m~ O O ~ N ~, acne-UZm~ ~ a O I L O LlJ J 'p O m C E ~ U' U o o ~ ~ Z ~ ~ o o o c u~ ~ ~ c9 C --~ p d Q ~ Q Q Q Q O Q Q ~ M L.. j~~ a (n m Z Z Z Z~ Z Z Q y J O m ~ C ~ d ~ ~7 n ~ ~ 0 O c ~ ~ O b m ~ ~ E o ~+ O °N' U `~ I~ a O) fn =_ m ~ N a ~ O d J ~ d ~ j C ~ 0 ~~ d o n ~ ~ C E N cV U ~ O N U N ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 v a~ ~D N O Q • • C,D,E,F,G 42 Arbors at Route 66 -Tentative Tract Map 18179 • DISCUSSION AND DESIGN JUSTIFICATIONS FOR 8/21/06 INCOMPLETENESS COMMENTS (April 17, 2007) (1) Office building Setbacks from Foothill Blvd. and Grove Avenue (#'s II.B.2.c. & e.) -Development Standards. --RCMC section 17.32.OSO.B.4. "Gateways" identifies the Foothill/Grove intersection as one of the two Entry Gateways along Foothill Boulevard. It states that: "The specific design of the two gateways is within the Foothill Boulevard -Historic Route 66 Visual Improvement Plan." ("VIP") T'he VIP states that: "The Grove Avenue intersection should incorporate large accent setbacks with a modified version of the City monument and a backdrop of large accent date . palms." (III. A page 9) --With regard to Foothill, RCMC section 17 32.080.A.8 e. contains a curb to building setback of 45', however that section refers specifically to Office and Residential Land Use, not Mixed-Use. --With regard to Grove, RCMC section 17.10.040.B. contains a building to curb setback of 35', however, that section applies specifically to the use of land within "office/commercial districts," and this property is mixed use. • -Design Justification and Support: Applicant has provided large accent setbacks for the office building in relation to the Foothill/Grove intersection. In dealing with the envelope of the building, the approach was to break up its massing and create a smaller, pedestrian-friendly structure. To achieve this, the building has many recessed areas along Foothill and Grove as well as at the building's front entry area. The variety of recesses creates an eclectic, playful feel often found in Tuscan architecture and brings an aesthetically pleasing symmetry to this corner. The Arbors has borrowed a number of design elements from the Sycamore Inn and Magic Lamp. The roof element has been broken up resulting in multiple, low-sloped roofs accented with a terracotta the and exposed rafters. The building creates a soft transition between the indoor and outdoor areas through the use of colonnades, trellises, arched openings and multi-recessed design. Its placement helps to screen the parking area from the streets and will help block sound from the intersection for the residential units. The result of this design is a dramatic 60' 8" setback from the curb at the FoothilUGrove intersection to the building's front entr}~. In addition, the setbacks from Foothill average 48', varying from 28' to 70'9", and the setbacks from Grove average 42', varying from 25' 1" to 76' These average setback measures exceed any relevant standards and provide the large accent setbacks required under the VIP. • Page 1 of 3 C, D,E,F,G 43 (2) Townhome Setbacks from Red I-Iill Country Club Drive if not vacated (# II B 2 f) -Development Standards: • --RCMC section 17.08.040.B. requires a curb to building setback of 27' in the event Red Hill Country Club Drive is not vacated. -Desien Justification and Support: The Townhomes have been clustered throughout the site to create additional shared open space for residents and is consistent with the project's overall design approach incorporating arbors and trellises to help create an intimate "village" feel. In addition to their Private, ground floor open space, Townhome residents can enjoy the Semi-Private open areas created by clustering their units which include landscaping, benches, a low seat wall, and trellises. The varying setbacks along Red Hill provide accents that break up the site lines and provide more interesting elevations and visuals from that perspective. At no point are the Townhomes unbrokenly massed along Red Hill, and the proposed setbacks average 31', varying from 21' 1" to 65'. Setbacks of less than 27' feet occur at only five points of 36' each, or about 34% of the 525' of frontage along Red Hill. At all other points along Red Hill the setbacks materially exceed 27'. Applicant is able to strictly comply with this standard if the City desires, though adjusting the site plan in that manner could reduce the project's central common open space area. (3) Townhome Setbacks from curb (# II.B.3.1: -Development Standards- • --RCMC section 17.08 040 E. requires internal curb to building setbacks of 15' for the Townhomes' two-story sections and 20' for the Townhomes' three-story sections. --RCMC section 17 02.140 Definitions -Cluster Development -Design Justification and Support: The proposed internal curb io building setbacks vary from 11' to 12' as a result of clustering the Townhomes which has been done to create additional shared open space for residents and is consistent with the proJect's overall design approach incorporating arbors and trellises to help create an intimate "village" feel. This design enables the Arbors to provide residents with additional Semi-Private and Common open space, which is encouraged under the City's development standards. In addition to their Private, ground floor open space, Townhome residents can enjoy the Semi-Private open areas created by clustering their units which include landscaping, benches, a low seat wall, and trellises In addition, all residents can take full advantage of the extensive Common amenities and open space The project's total Usable Private and Common open space exceeds relevant standards, as do the number of Recreation or equivalent amenities provided to residents. • Page 2 of 3 C, D, E,F,G 44 (4) Office buildna Height within 25' to 50' of street curb (# II.B.2.d.1: -Development Standards• --RCMC section 17.32.080.A.8.d. provides for a maximum height of 20' within 25' to 50' from the curb, and allows heights of 40' at other locations and 45' for towers, however that section refers specifically to Office and Residential Land Use, not Mixed-Use. --RCMC section 17.10.040 A. allows for a maximum height of 40' beyond 35' from the curb, however that section applies specifically to the use of land within "office/commercial districts," and this property is not within a commercial or office district. -Design Justification and Support: The office building was designed with its many recessed elements and two-story height of only 34', 40' Tower, to create a smaller, pedestrian-friendly structure. The building is not large, covering 9,41 ~ square feet, containing 12,610 square feet of leaseable space, and extending only 146' along both Grove and Foothill. The roof element has been broken up resulting in multiple, low-sloped roofs accented with a terracotta the and exposed rafters. This design has provided the large accent setbacks required for those streets under the VIP and are appropriate for the building's scale. It is consistent with the more urban design specified for this property by the City's Mixed Use development standards, while still retaining the "village" feel of this "dinnerhouse" district. Its scale and placement help to screen the parking area from the streets • and will help block sound from the intersection for the residential units. (5) Private, around floor open space provided for Townhomes (# II.B.4.): -Development Standards• --RCMC 17.08.040.B. requires 150 square feet of Private, ground floor open space. -Design Justification and Support: The Townhomes provide an average of 164 square feet of Private, ground floor open space, varying from 115 to 219 square feet. These design variations are a result of clustering the units which is done to create additional shared open space for residents, help create an intimate village setting and feel, as well as being consistent with the project's overall design theme incorporating arbors and trellises. This design enables the Arbors to provide residents with additional Semi- Private and Common open space. In addition to their Private, ground floor open space, Townhome residents can enjoy the Semi-Private open areas created by clustering their units which include landscaping, benches, a low seat wall, and trellises. In addition, all residents can take full advantage of the extensive Common amenities and open space. The project's total Usable Private and Common open space exceeds relevant standards, as do the number of Recreation or equivalent amenities provided to residents. Page 3 of 3 C, D, E,F,G 45 RECORDING REQUESTED BY: Order No WHEN RECORDED, RETURN TO. Leven & Seligman, LLP (LSM) 1801 Century Park East, Suite 2200 Los Angeles, CA 90067 PARKING DECLARATION THIS PARKING DECLARATION dated as of for reference purposes only (this "Declaration"), is made by ARBORS AT ROUTE 66, LLC, a California limited liability company ("Declarant"), with reference to the following: A. Declarant is the ownex of certain real property in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, more particularly described as follows (the "Project Lots"): Lot 1 and Lot 2 of Tract in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California as per Map filed in Book .Pages m the Office of the County Recorder of said County B. Declarant intends to develop each of the Project Lots with different uses as follows• Lot 1 will be developed with an office building, Iandscaping and an outdoor parking lot {the "Lot 1 Parking • Lot"), while Lot 2 will be developed as a gated residential condomuuum community with private streets and recreational amenities Seven of the condominiums (herein, the "Live/Work Units") within the community on Lot 2 will be developed as residential units with a ground floor office space. The ground floor office space within the Live/Work Units and the entrance to the same will face the Lot 1 Parking Lot, whereas the entrance into the residential area of the Live/Work Units will be from private streets within Lot 2. C. To encourage and facilitate the use of and entrance to the office/work area of the Live/Woxk Units by the invitees and clients (herein, the "L/W Permitted Users") of the owners (or tenants} thereof, Declarant desires to create, establish and reserve hereby certain easements for parking over and upon the Lot 1 Parking Lot during business hours for the benefit of the Live/ Work Units as hereinafter provided. D. Declarant also desires to establish certain other parking rights over and upon the Lot 1 Parking Lot during non-business hours for the benefit of all of the condominiums on Lot 2 as hereinafter provided. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing, incorporated herein by this reference, and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and adequacy of which are hereby acknowledged, DecIazant does hereby establish, create, declare and agree as follows: 1. Defined Terms. The following terms shall have the meanings set forth therefor ill this Section Page 1 G V4ldocsL4rbors Rte 661Parkrng Declaratron OS doc ~Xklb~T C, D, E,F,G 46 "Declarant" shall mean and refer to the entity identified above as the owner of Lots 1 and 2 and the same shall also mean and refer to the successors in interest of Declarant with respect to such • ownership, namely, (a) the fee owner from time to time of Lot 1 and/or the owners' association, if any, formed for the purpose of governing and maintaining Lot 1 (herein, the "Lot 1 Owner') and also (b) the fee owner from time to time of Lot 2 and/or the owners' association formed for the purpose of governing Lot 2 (herein, the "Lot 2 Owner"). The covenants and obligations made herem by Declarant as the Lot 1 Owner shall be the obligations and covenants of each successive Lot 1 Owner as and when fee ownership of Lot 1 (other than the transfer of title to condominiums on Lot 1) changes, and the covenants and obligations made herein by Declarant as the Lot 2 Owner shall be the obligations and covenants of each successive Lot 2 Owner as and when fee ownership of Lot 2 (other than the transfer of title to condominiums on Lot 2) changes "Lot 1 Business Hours" shall mean the hours from 8;00 AM to 6 DO PM, Monday through Friday "Lot 2 Permitted Users" shall mean and refer to the L/W Permitted Users together with the owners (or tenants) of the residential condominiums located on Lot 2 together with their guests and invitees. 2. Live/Work Parking Easements. Declarant as the Lot 1 Owner does hereby declare, establish and create non-exclusive easements (the "Live/4Vork Parking Easements") over and upon the Lot 1 Parking Lot for the use and benefit of the Live/Work Units for the parking of no more than two vehicles by the L/W Permitted Users at any one time during Lot 1 Business Hours. Declarant shall reserve two parking spaces for the L/W Permitted Users so marked within the Lot 1 Parking Lot along the eastern boundary of Lot 1 so that the same are in close proximity to the Live/ Work Units on Lot 2; provided, however, that the Lot 1 Owner shall have the right to move those parking spaces within the Lot 1 Parking Lot to the extent reasonably necessary as determined by the Lot 1 Owner The Live/ Work Parking Easements herem created and established shall also include pedestrian use of the Lot 1 Parking Lot by the L/ W Permitted Users. • 3. Lot 2 Parking Rights. The Lot 1 Owner does also hereby declare, establish and create the right and license for the benefit of the Lot 2 Permitted Users on anon-exclusive basis to park in available parkmg spaces upon the Lot 1 Parking Lot except during Lot 1 Business Hours The use of the Lot 1 Parking Lot by the Lot 2 Permitted Users shall be subject to such rules, regulations and restrictions that the Lot 1 Owner may adopt from time to time including those set forth on Exhibit A hereto provided that the same do not materially alter the rights and interests hereby created for the benefit of the Lot 2 Permitted Users. 4. Parking Lot Maintenance & Costs. Declarant as the Lot 1 Owner does hereby covenant and agree to keep and maintain the Lot 1 Parking Lot in good condition and repau at all times, free of debris and other hazards and materials. The costs incurred by the Lot 1 Owner with respect to the Lot 1 Parking Lot's maintenance (the "Maintenance Costs"} shall be allocated pro rata among the users thereof including the tenants or users of the office building situated on Lot 1 and their invitees in accordance with the formula set forth on Exhibit B hereto. The share of Maintenance Costs aIIocated to the Lot 2 Permitted Users shall be payable monthly by the Lot 2 Owner to the Lot 1 Owner 5. Reservation of Rights by Lot 1 Owner. Subject to the approval of governmental agencies having jurisdiction over the Project Lots, the Lot 1 Owner hereby reserves the following rights with respect to the use of the Lot 1 Parking Lot, whether by the Lot 2 Permitted Users or others (a) to assign and/ or to reserve speczbc parking spaces to specific users, (b) to permit the public to use the Lot 1 Parking Lot at tunes other than the Lot 1 Business Hours (provided, however, that the Lot 1 Owner does not covenant hereby to prevent public access to the Lot 1 Parkmg Lot at any time -- whether during the Lot 1 Busmess Hours ox otherwise), and (c) to restrict access to and use of the Lot 1 Parkmg Lot from time Page 2 • G 144docslArbors Rle 66V'arkrng Declaralron OS doc C,D,E,F,G 47 to time to the extent necessary or appropriate in order to perform maintenance thereon and/or for safety reasons. 6. Insurance Obli ag lions. 7. Indemnity Provisions 8. Dispute Resolution. (Mediation and Arbitration) 9. Waivers. The failure of the Lot 1 Owner or the Lot 2 Owner to require strict compliance with or to enforce strictly any of the terms or provisions hereof shall not constitute a waiver of that party's right thereafter to require strict compliance or to enforce the same or any other term or provision. No waver of any provision hereof shall be valid unless the same is in writing, signed by the party to be charged, and no such waiver shall be deemed or construed to be a waiver of any other provision hereof or a continuing waiver or the same or any other provision unless expressly provided to the contrary 10. Severability. If any term or provision hereof shall be held by any court of competent jurisdiction to be unenforceable or mvalid for any reason, the remaming portions hereof shall be unaffected thereby and shall remam in full force and effect. 11. Mortgageee Protection No violation hereof shall affect or impair the lien or charge of any bona fide mortgage or deed of trust made m good faith and for value on all or any portion of the Project Lots. 12. Attorneys' Fees In the event that any action or proceeding is brought to enforce or to interpxet or to obtain a declaration of the terms hereof or the rights or obligations of the parties hereunder or to resolve any dispute, controversy or claim among the parties hereto or to enjoin any breach or violation hereof, the prevailing party m any such action or proceedung shall be entitled to recover from • the losing party its costs of suit including its reasonable attorneys' fees as may be fixed by the court. 13. Covenants Running with the Land. This DecIaratlon and the easements, covenants and restrictions hereby established shall be construed as covenants running with the land that constitutes the Project Lots as an equitable servitude on each of them, as necessary, to achieve the intent of the party hereto. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Declarant as the Lot 1 Owner and the Lot 2 Owner has executed or caused this Declaration to be executed by its authorized offzcer, agent or representative as of the date first wntten above. "Declarant" Arbors at Route 66, LLC, a California limited Tiabihty company sy its • Page 3 G 141docslArbors Rte 661Park~ng Declaration OS doc C, D, E,F,G 48 STATE OF ) ss. COUNTY OF ) On ,before me, a Notary Public, personally appeared personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person whose name is subscribed to the within instrument, and acknowledged to me that such he/she executed the same in h>s/her authorized capacity, and that by his/her signature on the instrument the person, or the entity upon behalf of which the person acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal Notary Public in and for said State • Page 4 • G l4WocslArbors Rte 66lParkrng Dec/aratron OS doc C, D, E,F,G 49 Exhibit A • Restrictions on Use of the Lot 1 Parking Lot (to be provided} C Page 5 G 14Wocsb4rbors Rte 661Parking Declaration OS doc C, D, E,F,G 50 Exhibit B Maintenance Costs Allocated to Lot 2 (to be provided) • • Page 6 G 14{docslrirbors Rre 661Parkrng Declaration OS doc C, D, E,F,G 51 ARTICLE VIII USE RESTRICTIONS Section 8.3 LivelWork Unit Restrictions. In addition to the general use restrictions set forth in other provisions of Article VIII hereof, the Live/Work Units shall also be sublect to the following limitations and restrictions' 8.31 Restricted Uses. The Live/Work Units are designed to combine in one space both a work area or office and a residence The permitted uses of the Live/ Work Units shall be professional m nature and the same may mclude use by the following as well as persons with similar professions: accountants, bookkeepers, appraisers, lawyers, consultants, design professionals such as architects and • landscape, fashion and mterior designers, artists, artisans and photographers, insurance, real estate and travel agents, mortgage loan brokers, computer software and multimedia-related professionals, and busmesses that perform their services off-site but require an office for busmess management purposes including sales mcidental to the businesses conducted by the foregoing. Furthermore, the business operated within alive/ Work Unit shall be subject to the following (a) the business must be operated solely within the ground floor Ieve1 of the Live/Work Unit and shall not extend beyond the same, either to the Association Property or other levels or areas (e.g, the garage) of the Live/Work Unit; (b} the business is limited to the rendering of professional services or other similar activities by the Owner or tenant of the Live/ Work Unit, (c) the operation of the busmess is permitted by, and is at all trmes in compliance with, all applicable laws, and (d) operation of the busmess does not result m (i) the violation of any of the provisions of the Governing Documents, (u) any significant increase m the use of the Association Property or its Improvements by the Invitees to any Live/ Work Unit, (iii) any odor, noise or vibration outside of the Live/Work Unit, or (iv) any negative impact on the rate or availability of insurance for the Prolect or the Building m which the Live/Work Unit is situated The Live/Work Units shall not be used primarily for retail uses or any other use that attracts or relies upon continual customers, visitors or members of the general public For example, no Live/Work Unit shall be used as a retail operation for the sale of food or beverages, vitamins, flowers, gifts, pets or pet food or similar products or for the provision of onsite services such as a haircutting salon or barbershop, a tattoo parlor, music or other instruction or lessons 8 3 2 Office Building Parking Lot Use of the Office Building Parking Lot by the Invitees of Owners of Live/ Work Units is otherwise sublect to the terms, provisions, conditions, requirements and restrictions set forth m the Parking Declaration, wh:ch creates, among other thmgs, non-exclusive easements for parking for the benefit of and as an appurtenance to the Projects Live/Work Units. Each Live/Work Unit shall be liable for ifs share of the costs, fees and expenses incurred m connection with the mamtenance and repair of the Office Buildmg Parkmg Lot as provided in the Parking Declaration. Each Owner of a Live/ Work Urut shall also be liable to the Association and to third parties for all damage, loss, Iiability, costs and expenses associated with the acts and/or omissions of such Owner m the use of the Office Building Parking Lot, whether by such Owner or its Invitees. Said non-exclusive parking easements shall run with and be bmding upon the Live/ Work Units as provided in the Parking Declaration 8 3.3 Access Doors for Invitees. Notwithstandmg any contrary provisions herein, Owners of the Live/Work Units shall be solely responsible for the maintenance, repair and replacement (mcluding casualty msurance for the same) of the exterior doors and windows that provide access or light to the work area or office of the Live/ Work Unit 8 3 4 Si a e. [to be provided] 8.3.5 Prolect Parkm~ [cross reference to following Section m Article IT of CC&Rs] • G 14klocslArbors Rte 661Art V11! Lwe-Work LSM 44 doc ( I ~X~1~~~ ~ C, D, E,F,G 52 Section 2. Parking Easements for Live/4Vork Units. Declarant does hereby reserve and estabixsh as an appurtenance to and for the exclusive use and benefit of the Live/ Work Units during Busmess Hours only (i.e, 8 00 am - 6 00 pm Mon-Fri} those certain five parkmg spaces (the "Live/Work Parking Spaces") situated upon the Associatron Property that are depicted on Exhibit _ hereto, and the same shall be so reserved by means of appropriate signs maintamed by the Association. Notwithstanding the identification of the Lxve/Work Parking Spaces on said Exhibit _, the Associatron shall have the right, power and authority to move the location of the Live/ Work Parkmg Spaces from time to tune in order to meet the needs of the Owners within the Project. 8.3.6 Use of Project Amenities. (no access to or use of Project amenities by Invitees of Live/ Work Units unless accompanied by Owner of Live/ Work Unit) 8 3 7 Change in Use of Live/ Work Units. Any change in use of a Live/ Work Unit shall requtte the prior approval of the Board of Directors and the same shall be based upon the restrictions and requirements of this Section 8.3 and the Governing Documents. An Owner who proposes to change the use of his Live/Work Unit (whether as a result of the sale of the same to a buyer or the Iease of the same to a tenant of the entire Live/Work Unit or otherwise) shall submit his request for approval to the Board together with such additional documents and information as the Board may require, and the Board shall render its decision withm days after receipt of all requested and required information • C 14klocsUrbors Rte 66L4rt VI/1 Grve-Work (LSM) 04 doc C, D, E,F,G 53 Memo to• Vance Pomeroy • From: Peter Bachmann/Jason Kamm Date: May 29, 2007 Re: Arbors at Route 66 -Summary of Neighbor Outreach Efforts We put the property under contract in May 2005 and almost immediately began meeting with the adjacent Rancho neighbors including Debra Wilson, Anthony Vernola who owns the Magic Lamp, Reza Vafa, the proprietor of the gas station, and Mark Campbell who is the general manager of the Red Hill Country Club, as well as the four Upland neighbors along the northern property boundary, the Foys, Hamms, Parsons and Jon Oloffson. Virtually from the beginning of the development process and until now, we have by phone, e-mail or m person spoke and/or met with these individuals more than 40 times regarding the project, and will continue to have additional meetings and conversations with them. With regard to our Neighborhood meetings, Rancho required that we notice property owners within a 2000-foot radius of the property plus the 500 or so individuals who had appeared on a petition list that was generated in Fall 2006, for a total of approximately 1300 property owners. Although those meetings were to be held on March 6th, 8th, and 12`h, starting in mid-January we began visiting neighbors' homes in both Rancho Cucamonga and Upland to introduce ourselves and talk with them about the project and any concerns or issues they might have. We spent about twelve (12) days walking the neighborhoods and visited more than 300 homes within the notice area, including • approximately 190 in Rancho and 125 in Upland. We spent as long or as short with people as they wanted to discuss the project and any issues they had Most people were home when we called, but if people were not home, we left letters with our contact information and approximately twelve called us at a later date. We had our Neighborhood Meetings during the first two weeks of March on the dates specified above. The invitations were mailed at least two weeks before each meeting and a neighbor created an additional flyer urging Rancho neighbors to attend the meetings. All three meetings were attended by a combination of Rancho and Upland neighbors and we had our Traffic Engineer attend the third meeting on March 12th to help answer questions. On Saturday, March 10th, we called twelve of the project's harshest critics to let them know that our Traffic Engineer would be there to try and help deal with their traffic issues. A total of 108 neighbors came to the three meetings. As we have been developing this project with the City of Rancho over the past two years, we have also been engaged along the way with neighbors regarding traffic, parking, the property's zoning and mix of uses, the site plan, density, protecting views and privacy, property values, hours of operation, restrictions on live/work units, access, parking, unit sizes, landscaping, and retaining walls, among other things. Some of the results of these meetings and discussions include: 1) choosing to go mostly residential instead of commercial for less traffic, fewer parking issues, less noise, and nicer views; 2) where Rancho wanted a commercial piece, choosing office over retail because of shorter hours • of operation and less traffic and so as not to compete with area retail; 3) choosing general 1~1~ ~N C,D,E,F,G 54 office over medical office to further reduce traffic by more than 300 daily trips; 4) • reducing unit count during the development process from 127 to 98 including adding a higher proportion of single family homes instead of townhomes resulting m a reduction in density from 12.7 to 9.8; 5) placing one-story single family homes along the northern and southeastern boundaries to be more compatible with and less intrusive of those adjacent single family one-story homes; 6) placing appropriate use restrictions on the live/work units; 7) working out CC&R's to ensure that the Office tenants, live/work residents, and residents can all take appropriate advantage of the project's parking; 8) offering to pay for the construction of new retaining walls along the northern boundary and on the Upland neighbors' properties to replace the existing, insufficient retaining walls on and along their properties, 9) providing for and paying to install a new tree/landscape buffer along that boundary and the southeastern boundary along Debra Wilson's property; and 10) site access via Grove Avenue with emergency-only access on Red Hill Country Club Drive. • • C, D, E,F,G 55 L March 19, 2007 ARBORS AT ROUTE 66, LLC 16661 Ventura Blvd ,Suite #712 Encino, Cahfornta 91436 Phn (818)325-8840 Fax (818)906-9859 Vance Pomeroy Planning Department City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Re: Neighborhood Meetings Report Arbors at Route 66 Northeast Corner of Foothill & Grove APN's 0207-011-035, 36, and 41, 43, 44, 45 Tentative Tract Map # 18179 & DRC 2006-00341 Dear Vance: Pursuant to the Clty Council's direction, we Invited the people listed on the 2000' radius • map and "petition list" to the neighborhood meetings. This totaled approximately 1,300 area residences and businesses. For a number of weeks praor to these meetings, Jason and Peter walked the adjacent neighborhoods and visited over 300 homes in Rancho Cucamonga and Upland reviewing the project with neighbors, discussing questions and concerns, and inforlrung them of these meetings before the invitations were sent. This was in addition to many conversations and meetings held over the past 20 months with the Rancho and Upland neighbors who immediately border the property. Three (3) separate meetings were held at 7 pm on Tuesday, 3/6/2007, Thursday, 3/8/2007, and Monday, 3/12/2007, at the Aita Auditorium at the San Antonio Community Hospital. The Invitations for the 3/6 and 3/8 meetings were maned on Friday 2/16/07 and the invitations for the 3/12 meeting were mailed on Tuesday 2/20/07 Also, a neighbor sent out an additional flyer to neighbors urging them to come to the meetings. All three meetings were attended by a combination of neighbors from both cities 26 full-size boards were displayed at all the meetings including color site plans, landscape plans, building elevations, renderings, and unit floor plans. Copies of the site plan, renderings, elevations, and floor plans were made available to attendees to take if they wanted, along with a copy of General Plan section 2.5.5.4 for the Western Gateway in the Bear Gulch Area, a copy of the chart summarazing the project's trip generation in comparison with other project alternatives, Appendix E of the Traffic Study -Trip Generation Guide, and a copy of the letter from the Central School Distract projecting the • number of K-8 students generated by the project. ExHia,r P C, D, E,F,G 56 Foothill & Grove -Neighborhood Meeting Summary Page 2 of 5 People were allowed to walk around and look at the boards, talk, and ask questions on an • unstructured basis for the first 15 minutes or so. After that period and when everyone was seated, we provided a 15-20 minute presentation about the project and then allowed questions and comments until neighbors had no more. We had our Traffic Engineer, Paul Martin, attend the March 12 meeting, and called 16 neighbors on that prior Saturday to let them know Paul would be there. Attendance at the meetings was as follows: March 6, 2007 - 33 people March 8, 2007 - 63 people (12 repeat) March 12, 2007 - 39 people (15 repeat) The combined totals reflect 108 different community members from the two cities at the meetings from the approximately 1,300 invitations sent out. The following is a -summary of the questions, concerns, issues and problems expressed at the meeting, and a description of how we have addressed them. As a general matter, we were fortunate to understand the major issues concerning neighbors from the beginning of this process from meetings wrth, and input received from the City Planning and Engineering staffs, as well the City's Planning Commissioners in October 2005. This has enabled us to work with staff over the past 20 months to design a project that anticipated and actively addressed neighbor concerns. To our knowledge, there are no neighbor concerns we have not willingly addressed during this process. • 1. Can the area handle the total daily taps generated by the project? Do residential units really generate less traffic than office, retail and medical uses? The project is designed to be primarily residential, which generates significantly fewer daily car trips than other uses allowed under the property's Mixed-use zoning, such as a large medical facility or retail center would. Based upon the standards utilized by the Institute of Traffic Engineers and the City's Engineering staff, the traffic forecast to be generated by this project is 799 daily trips. This is a fraction of the daily tnps forecast to be generated by potential alternative projects including a large medical facility, which would generate 6,541 daily trips, and a large retail facility, which would generate 4,105 daily trips. Choosing office over retail was dnven m large part by neighbors' desires to limit hours of operations and traffic for the commercial portion of the site. Retail generates more traffic than office, and operates on more of a "24/7" basis which can be more disruptive to neighbors. Also, because the office building will be largely vacant on weekends and weeknights, it can provided residents additional parking at those times if needed. General office was chosen over medical office which will save more than 300 daily trips because medical office generates more than three times the daily trips that general office does. • C,D,E,F,G 57 Foothill & Grove -Neighborhood Meeting Summary Page 3 of 5 • 2. How will these additional trips impact the FoothilUGrove intersection and traffic up Red Hill Country Club Drive, including additional students and trips to the Valle Vista Elementary School? With the addition of project-generated tnps, the FoothilllGrove intersection would continue operating at a Level of Service, or LOS, grade of C, which is a grade higher than the City's acceptable intersection standard of LOS D. In fact, the impact is de- minimus. Currently, the Average AM Delay is 21.6 seconds and the Average PM Delay is 24.4 seconds. The project generated traffic brings the Average AM Delay up only 2/lOths of a second to 21.8, and the Average PM Delay up 1/10th of a second to 24.5. Based upon City-established thresholds of significance, the addition of project related tnps is forecast to result in no significant impacts. No SANBAG Congestion Management Program Traffic Impact Analysis is required because both a.m. and p.m. peak hour trips are well below thresholds Theses results are before factoring in the City's Foothill Boulevard improvements, which should do more to improve traffic at that intersection and along Foothill. According to an analysis done by the Central School District, the project will generate 17 elementary school students which translates into 20 trips per day on Red Hill Country Club Drive to and from the Valle Vista Elementary School. Given Red Hill's existing traffic count of 3,609 daily trips, this would result in an increase of only .55 percent. 3. Upland residents raised concerns about the project having a sole point of access onto Grove Avenue, largely relating to traffic and fairness. They asked questions about the traffic analysis that concluded this was appropriate, and whether the Cities of Rancho Cucamonga and Upland had both agreed with this approach. The Grove Avenue access has been analyzed, reviewed and approved by the project's traffic engineer, Rancho Cucamonga Engineering, and the City of Upland in conjunction with emergency access only on Red Hill Country Club Drive The driveway/entrance is 60 feet in width, as opposed to the normally-required 50 feet width. The access meets the City of Rancho Cucamonga's sight hne and other requirements, and the residential gate works to regulate traffic at the entrance. Though this sole point of access puts all of the traffic onto Grove, the total traffic generated by the project is low, and significantly lower than other development alternatives. Also, the small size of this project allows for only one access point, where virtually all larger commercial alternatives would require at least two full points of access. If one of the commercial project alternatives described in the traffic study were developed on the site, we agree that a second point of ingress/egress would be required for the project. However, as a comparison, if the Grove access bore only 50°Io of the C, D, E,F,G 58 Foothill & Grove -Neighborhood Meeting Summary Page 4 of 5 higher volume of traffic generated by each of those other two uses, the total trips on • Grove would be still be materially higher than the 799 proposed by the project. 4. Concerns were raised about the density of the project, which for the most part related back to the amount of traffic the project would generate. There were virtually no negative comments about the project's quality, site plan or architecture. The City's development standards allow up to 14 units per acre under the rmxed-use designation. Over the 20-month development process, the number of residential units has been reduced several times from its starting point of 127. The current number of 98 units, along with its density of 9.8 per acre, are well below allowable standards. The proposed combination of a small office building, live/work townhomes, and high quality single family homes and townhomes, is designed to generate far less traffic than other allowable uses involving a retail center or medical facility would. For example, a development including a large medical facility would generate 8.2 times the number of daily trips, and a large retail center 5.1 times that number. 5. What was the General Plan Amendment fors The property is part of the Western Gateway in the Bear Gulch Area, Foothill Boulevard Development District. Its primarily Mixed-use designation allows for different combinations of Commercial and Residential uses subject to the ranges and caps set forth in Table III-7 of Section 2.5.5.4 of the 2001 General Plan. Table III-7 gives the City the flexibility to deterrrune what this exact rmx of uses should be, allowing "for a high degree of flexibility and responsiveness to the market" at the time the property is developed. The project as proposed falls within those acceptable ranges of uses and is under the cap for total residential units allowed. There are two parts to the GPA. The first is a request to change the zoning of the 1.4 acre portion of the property zoned low density residential to mixed-use to make it consistent with the 8.6 acre portion of the property already zoned mixed-use. This is common to do when a property contains a number of parcels under one ownership to help facilitate an orderly and consistent development of the property overall. The second part of the GPA relates to the total number of residential units for the area. Table III-7 allows for the total number of residential units for the entire 55-acre Bear Gulch Area to range from 231 to 385. Currently, 206 units have been approved for development there, so the GPA would confirm an area total of 304 units, still well below the cap of 385. 6. A sentiment that the strawberry farm should remain forever. We understand that the strawberry farm is loved by neighbors. The farmer, Brian Nicolson, has known for awhile that the property would be sold by the Hospital and has been preparing for that. He and virtually all neighbors acknowledge that the property will be developed, but we understand peoples' feelings about the strawberry farm and C, D, E,F,G 59 Foothill & Grove -Neighborhood Meeting Summary Page 5 of 5 • have worked to be understanding of this, including allowing Brian to remain as long as possible. 7. What is going on wrth the planned Foothill Boulevard improvements and Red Hill Country Club Drive re-alignment? How does this project fit in with those plans? For the status of the Foothill Boulevard improvements and Red Hill Dnve realignment, we told neighbors that they should speak with City personnel. As part of the Western Gateway in the Bear Gulch Area, this property is part of the City's entrance from Upland, and was designed with that in mind. The project is responsible for building the City monument and the Route 661andscaping and visual improvements along its Foothill frontage. The office building's corner orientation, large accent setbacks and architecture, along with the City's landscape and sign design, help create a dynamic entrance to the City. The ability to both live and work at the project in a high quality "village like" environment makes it unique in Rancho. The project is helping with Rancho's efforts to honor the historic nature of Route 66 through its name, signage, arbors theme, and architectural elements. The project's combination of residential and office use helps achieve the City's desired level of population and activity for this "dinnerhouse" district contributing to the area's economic vitality. If you have any further questions, please feel free to contact us. • Sincerely, Jason Kamm & Peter Bachmann Attachments 1. Meeting Attendance List (summary of all three meetings) 2. Copies of Sign In Sheets from 3/6, 3/8, and 3/12 3. Meeting Invitations 4 Petition Mailing List 5 2000' Radius Map Mailing List 6. Copy of Neighbor Flyer 7. Copy of Project Graphics 8 Proposed and Alternate Land Use Daily Tnp Generation Chart 9. Appendix E of the Traffic Study -Trip Generation Guide 10. Letter from Central School District on Student Generation and traps 11. General Plan, Section 2.5.5.4 -Western Gateway in the Bear Gulch Area • C, D, E,F,G 60 c0~-r~~cOOONNOp00MMO~~toOCDMCO~OOpc0c0c0c0Ot1')~N~'~t cflcOrM ~ r .- 00 00 ~- O O M M N N d' '~ O ~ ~ M O O N l[1 00 M tf') cp ~- In ~ O I~ M M Lf) ~ O O M (D r' 00 O O O O O O CD CO CD N N T r ~ ~ to ~ O (D Ln M T r l1') ~ 1~ ~ d' 1~ 00 L(7 O CO CO N N ~ 00 N CO ~- r O O~ T r ~' 'Ct' Op 00 e- ~- ~- r T O O O~ M N~ CO 00 r l!') lf~ I~ O N r M M f~ f~ CO O O 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 N T r N N N ~- r N N~~ 0 0~ r- ~- In N N r tf) N r lf~ Lf) Ln N N CO N N N T T 1 1 1 1 ~- ~- CO N a • N 00 00 00 00 00 00 OD OD op op o0 oD ~ ~ N M M o0 O O N o0 •- M o0 00 op op op ~ oD o0 00 00 00 00)d')00~00000OOOONO00 f~ I~NOCfl000000000>Od~ O 00 00 ~t 00 OQ)00 C .~..-..-..~ .~ .-..-. ,-. ~. ~ ~ .~ .~..-. ,-. ,-. ~ ~ .~..-..-. ,-..-..~ . ~ .-..~..-..-. O ~ C~ ~~~~~~~~~ O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O -C O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ ~~~~~~ O O O O d7 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N J d V C R C :~+ 0 R i /O/~ ri L Q CD O O O O O CO CD CO CO to CO Cfl CO O CO Cfl O 00 M M M M M o0 00 00 of 00 00 00 W M OO o0 M ti ti ti ti ti~~ ti ti ti ti ti~ ti~~ ti ti T T T T T T r T r r T [~ T t"~ T r T T N rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn a~ v~ ~ m m rn ~ c c c c c c c E E E E E E E 'a ca cv cu ca cu "a 'n -o 'a ~ ~ ~ ~ co ~ 'a co C U U U U U C C C C C C C C U C C U (Q 7 7 7 7 7 f0 (6 (0 (0 (6 f6 (II f6 O N f0 7 QU U U U U a a n a n a n aU a a.U ~ o o O O O ~ ~ _ ~ > > _ ~ O ~ ~ O U U V U U U U +.• (B ttS (Q fII tt5 (0 f~ L ~ ~ o ~ _~ o L o L Q U U ~ ~ ~ co cII c0 (~ to ca _N .~ ... ~ c~-LO C m ~~>» o 0 0 0 0 0~ o ~U~ ~ a~ 3 .•..•. o 0 ocgcncgcq~~ .mos.= 3 np X 0 0 0 ~U m ca c~ m cu cv o 0 oMMUp c O D U "J "= O O O O O O O m m ~p r r f~0 O O -- J J- J J J J J J O O U W W Q ~p J22TT o~~00f~1~~~tiMMN~(A O O U N N M M I~ ti T T~ 0 0 ~ 'L7 'L7 M~ r r r r r r ~- t(') ~ 'cf ~ U ~~~~~~ T T r r r r O T T M M ~ ~ Q a° Tr T r TrT M O CO ~ ~ O O O CO (D CO (fl CO O CO CO Cfl O O O O OOC~oOMM Ma0o~o0o0o0MO0 o0o0MMMM ~ ti ti~ ti ti ti ti~ ti ti ti ti ti ti ti~ ti ti ~- T T T r r ~- T T T r T T T T TT r .- T r ~ ~ ~ ~ V/ v~a~o~ m a~rnmm 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -o-aa c~a ~ ~-a-o-o-a~ ~~-c~ m m ~ c~a C C C U U U C C C C C U C C C U U U U (0 N f0 7 7 7 (~ (0 N N flf 7 (6 f6 (~ O 7 7 7 a s aU U U n a a a n.U n n aU U U U ~ ~ ~ O O o > > > > ~ O ~ ~ ~ O O O o U U U U U U U U C C C C C C C C ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N N ~ c > > ~ (C N N (` ~ > Q O N o ~ O O Q UQ~ ~~~ > > ~ caU ~ > > oUU c~LaU E o W a~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ m ~ ~ C7 UUUU U ~C~ZU>UQQZ o a~ oc°oc°o~nv-o ~~ N r O O r O N N J~ U N N O O O U O O 'ci' ~ ~ M ~ T N M ~ N T r ~ to lL~ ~ ~ O T r ~ O ~~ O~ TT r M~ I T T [~ l"~ T r r T T l"' l'~ T r r r T • J ~I ~ r T \"' [~ l"' T T r r T [~ [~ T T T r r r T r T T T T r T r r T r T T M 2 ca J L L N N O C C `- L ~ 0 0 ~~ (B N N O E O (6 c >' >' ~ ~ ~ vOi ~ ~ ~ ~ ~^I c w ca ~ to ,N c ~ ~ N '~ c c -a ~ vNi o o ~ > > 5 aci ~ ~ ~~ E > >, >, L L c c ~ >, >, -> a~ > o~~ o o L L L c~ ~ o 0 0 0 o rn a~ U ~ o ca ca o 0 o ca ca c~ c~ o o a~ a~ o ca o = - - U o L ca ca o c~ ~. cn~~mmm~~aa»~~~~~=>100wc~~~ammUx~c~ ~~~UUQF- N Z L C N N C~ N ~ C ~ O C "C "~ ~ ~ ` (a 'O >. .~Q C '~ +. Y +~ > N ~ 'p ~~~~ C~ L E N >, > Y O ~" O N L O L ~ O C U N O (B O (0 ~ (0 ~ L O C - O O O (0 O ~ N O f0 ~ p O ~, ~ 'n ~ c ~ U ~ L ~ co ~ p ca ~ (~ ~>, ~CnU~~d(n~OQQ~F-U~d~m~YUI M~cq~WmmW~-~cnc~ m 2~Zm~J r N C~7 ~ lf') CO 1~ O O O r N M ~ l2') C.O I~ O O O N M ~ ~ (D I~ CO O O N Ch ~ tL7 CD I~ 00 Q1 O T T r r ~- r r r T r N N N N N N N N N N M C") C~') C") M M C'7 M M M '~ ~~W~~~ ~ C,D,E,F,G 61 ~t'cYt1'ct'~ ~~7'rt~Olly00 ~~~-O)d'~ ~lnOd' d'NO InOto~M•-~-OCO N OOf~o0O~0pOOCO~NCnNOO~i~1~000I~I~CON OCOOOMNNCOO r-r-MOOMO~~~~'OONIn00)NOOf~~MO>O~t~~ Cf~000OCOMO)OOCA N ~ ~- 1~ M M O M~~ lfl ~ 00 In N M M lf~ N N I~ ti Lf) ~ ~ N In CA O ~- ~- O O O ~ r CT i ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ N ~ ~ i i ~ ~~ ~~ i ~ i~ ~ ~ O ~ NCO ~ ~ ~ O o0 N i ~ t!') lf~ 00 CO CO t1') l1~ O r r r N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~ i i CO N Cn t1') N tfy to tC) Cf~ fa MM~tOpop~o0o0o0M Oo000COOCbM'~~oOCOOOOC70OC) ~COC7000Cf)00ODC70 C70 N O>OOd~000001~tO000CAON0000000000 d~Cn000 Q>000) • O 0 0) O Q) Q) 0 0 0 0 0 0) O) d7 CA 0) 0 0) [~ Q) O) CA CA CA 0 0) O CA 0 0) CA CA CA O O O O O O CA O = 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ 00[AOOOOOOOOCACACACAOOOOOOOOOOO~O CA000>OOd)Cn O>0000 CDCOOOOCOOCOCDOOCO00000000000000 CO COCO000000(OCOCOCO O C7p M M M C70 M C70 dp M M Cp M M M M M M M M M M M M M M 00 00 CO M M M M M M C70 C70 dp 00 ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti~ ti~~ ti~ ti ti~~~ ti ti ti~~ ti~ ti ti ti~~ ti ti ti ti ~ ~ ~ ~ rnrnrnrna~rnrna~rnrnrnrnrnrnrnrnrnrnrnrnrnrnrna~rnrn rnrnrnrnrnrnrnrnrnrnrnrnrn N tts ca ctf m m ca cts co m ca cv o cn to ca co ca cv «f m ca cts cts ca m ca mmm m mv~ mrnC~a>rnmmrnmrno>mmrn a~C~a~t~mm C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 "O "O f0 (0 (0 ~ (~ 'O 'O f4 (0 ~ (B (B (6 (0 N CB CO fCf N fV f~ (6 Ctf ftf 'O 'O "O CO (D (D t0 W (6 "O "O "O 'O C C U U U C U C C U U C U U U U U U U U U U U U U U~ C C C U U U U U U C C C C N (Cf 7 7 7 (6 7 f0 CE 7 7 C6 >> C 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7~ C. (6 (6 N 7~~ 7 7 7 ftf CiS ftS tII a Q.U U U nU n nU U aU U U U U U U U U U U U U U~ a s nU U U U U U n n n n ~~ o 0 0~ o~~ o o~ o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~>> o O O O o o>>>> L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C ;~-~ f0 (0 (~ (CI ft{ (tf (B ftf CO 4S (E CO f[{ f9 (0 (0 fB f6 CO (B ClS N (D (B N Ctf O Ca C6 _ N ~ ~ ~ co ca ... D D co ~ -° a ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 0 ~ n ~ p rn > > u ~ O n ~ ~ ca N u in ~ ~ O ~ ~ _N rn cA cn U > > cn ~ ~ aQi > ~ cA ~ ~ w i > > > ~ ~ ate`) > ~ > ~ E ~ - ca cts ~ cv `'o ~ a~i ~ ~ ctS c`o ~ ~ cts ~ ~ ~ ~ > m cy m m ~ J J -O Q Q J Q U U m Q -~ Q U>> Q>> ~p ~p ~ Q Q m Q~ M M O C'7 M O M N N O ~ 00 O~ ~~~ U U ~~~ ~' In LC) W' O M~ O~~ r M N O tl0 O Cn CO CO O N N ~ ~ ~ ~. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ti O O ~ ~ ~ `O CO ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~~ a Q a ~~ > > f!1 ~ rn u> N N N > > N N QQL >»> ~ ~ o p-o-o 0 oMU m 0 oUUC~C7» ~~~~~u~a~~~ZZ~~ U' C7 W Q>>> Q Q t!~ lf) C C Cn ~ lf') B O O M ap pp ~ ~~~ ti ti ti M O O ti M M~~ d' ~F ~t p l~ l~ 0) pp pp ~- .- ~ ~ ~~ ti ti ti ti ti M 0 M CU Z CO J ~ ~ L ftf p L` C ~, ~- O E E (0 C >+ ~ - C~ N N O O a `~ to O N E O~ O O O E y CU N C C ` O N O ,~ N Z' Z' (0 ~ (B (II (0 ` Y ~ C~~ C .~C Y O y- "O ~ a 0 0` ~_ O C C O~~~ Z C ~ ~. U O_ C 'C U~ Q) U U O U ~~~ o N (0 O~~ (0 ~ c~ 7> 0 0 ~_ 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 (0 p p~ (6 O O O CII Q N N m N Cn fn O~~ J~ H F- U D Cn ~~ Y Y~~ Y m CO J m m C~ LL 2 J J m U=_~ 2 ~ ~ ~ J 0 CU Z L (CS ~ O (B C C ~ N +L+ (6 ~ '~ J CB CU ~ C E O C O O O • __ C ~ 'O O ~ ~ ~Lr ~ U >, ~ C O ~ ~ ~ G O - ~ ~_ 7 ~ ~ E C~ ~ ~ N > ~' C "~ ~ ~ ~ N L O O Cti 0 0 0 (0 L O O (Q O O fB O Cp > (0 O f0 Cp G O O N (Q O (0 O N O O--- ~U~>U` ~QUYU~~~~U` 2U=~WU--~~d~~f-d~~(n~Zm~JmQWU N M ~t ~ c0 I~ 00 O O N M I tf> cD 1~ O O O N M~~ O~ 00 O O N M~~ CD I~ O CJ) O V' ~" ~' d' V ~ ~ V '7 ~ t1') ~ ICJ lf> t[7 L[') l2') l[') Lf') CO CD CO CO tD CO CO CO CO CD I~ ti ~ t` ti ~ ti ~ ~ ~ 00 C,D,E,F,G 62 OOCO Oti~~~OONN~M~--MNNOrInLn 0p OHO CO r O 'cf N 00 00 CO CO CD Lf') to f~ O 'V' I~ CC CO N a0 I~ ti M ~ CO In OIn6~ N o0001~COCOMM I~tnMInCDCOCflC000C0 r NCOM Cp LL7 O In M r r r O O N N In O M O N N CO Lf) O O I 1 1 1 1 00 1 M I~ ~- I I I 1 1 1 rLnCp I I 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 I I NrNNInOOIn~npONNU")LnlnN~n~n O N~nCO M~~ Cfl CO M M M d' c}' M M r N M O M 00 M M M M ~ M M E • O O O O N N O O O O O p 0~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O p O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 p O p 0 0 0 0 0 O O O = O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O O O O O O O p ~ ~ ~ .F+ N J d V C C r Q C yd co m N0 LL ~+ y.. L Q • 00(OCfl000000CO00CD(DO00000C0000000 OCOO M M M M p M M M M CO M M CO M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M f~ 1~ 1~ I~ r~~ h I~ ti ti ti ti~~~ ti ti ti ti~ ti~ ti~ ti~ ti~ ti r r r r I~ r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r N rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn a~ rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn m co ca ca to co ca co cts as co co m ca m «s ca ca cv co cB cv o~m v~mo~v~ vim a~o>v~rno~o~ o»rnrnrnm m m C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E (6 (0 p "O O (a (0 (a (6 "a f9 (C 'O 'O (~ (a (0 (0 (0 (0 ~ (6 (6 (Q fQ f0 (0 (0 "O (0 U U C C C U U U U C U U C C U U U U U U C U U U U U U~ U C U 7 7 (0 (0 f6 0 7 0 7 (C 7 7 (6 (d 0 7>> O 7 fB 0 0 7 7 7 7 C` 7 t0 7 U U n. n. aU U U U aU U a aU U U U U U aU U U U U U c~ U o.U oo»~oooo~oo»oooooo~ooooo0 0~0 L L L L L L L L L L L L L t L L L L L L L L U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C '~ (0 f0 (D (B (6 (~ (6 N (0 t~ (~ (B (6 f0 (0 (B (0 f~ fQ (0 (~ f0 U ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ° > > _ U > > ~ 0 > pp >__UU ~n cn rn.... ~,c_a rncq ~ U ~ r o ~ U h N ~ a~ a~ ~ ~ ~ j ate. ~ U a~ a~ ~° Q > > c~ c~ U c~ U ~ U ~ ~ W o ° ~ a~ a~ ~ ~ m ~ N = cu ca ~ io ~ p W cu ca ~ ~ 2 ~ ~ ~ Q NN~IlQ fV (~ZUUW W2»Q~~J~ ~ ~ 0 0"O~ QMQ ~ Lf~ ~ r O ~ ~ ~ ~ M M ~ ~ ~ N O ~ d0' ~ ~ ti (n f/) m m W' ~ ~ COO ~ ~ r ~~tid0'~~OM~~~titi~titir MM~~tt Oti0rC~0 a ~ Q r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r M a° M M r r r r r r r ~ M O M t~0 M M O O ~ ~ ~ N to O O O a a ~ c~ c~ c~a c~ >, p ~ ~ a~ c'o 0 0 ~' o o ~ ~ N ~ c`u ~ a~ a~ ~' a~ ~ ~ p o N ~ ~ ~ o O J S /l 1 ! 1 f 1 \ !'1 f 1 ! 1 !1 T T M M~ Pl ~/ ! 1 M M n /"1 IA !A N 11 I L f1 L ? >, O~ C C° ~+ N O O ... to ~~ O N -Op p~~ N C O N C~ ~ CD~~JJQ WUJQ-~> W'U~~CA W UUU(nJm-~~ W'2 WUd N C'7 ~ I.C) C.O I~ O Q) O N M d' I.['> CD I~ O O O N M ¢7 In CO I~ OD O) O r 00 O O O W O O OO O O C7) C11 O O Cf) O Q1 O O O O O O O O O O O O r r r r r r r r r r r r r U d) C N E N O L ...~ f~ O N C O (~ N ` O_ N O C N C a t~ ~a O U ao a~ o n ^^~ LL D >, tU O C ~ O N C ~ d O C h ~ M N m (B W C,D,E,F,G 63 DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS • 7:10 p m. Vance Pomeroy March 20, 2007 PRJ2006-00094: FOOTHILL AND GROVE MIXED USE -ARBORS AT ROUTE 66 LLC - Office/SFR/Townhouse/Live/Work Master Plan project with condominium map, General Plan Amendment, Development Code Amendment, and Development District Amendment. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2006-00223 - ARBORS AT ROUTE 66 LLC - A request to change the land use designation for four parcels on Red Hill Country Club Drive from Open Space to Mixed Use to be consistent with the Mixed Use land use designation at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Grove Avenue, to add these same four parcels to Section 2.5.5 4 Western Gateway in the Bear Gulch Area and amend associated Table III-7 to increase the maximum number of dwelling units from 231 to 304, and to establish a Master Plan Overlay District for this project site on the Land Use Plan in accordance with Section 111.2.4 1 of the General Plan -APN. 0207-011-35, 36, 41, 43, 44 and 45. Related Files: Development District Amendment DRC2006-00350, Development Code Amendment DRC2007-00029, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18179, Development Review DRC2006-00341. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT DRC2006-00350 -ARBORS AT ROUTE 66 LLC - A request to change the zoning for four parcels on Red Hill Country Club Drive from Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) to Mixed Use to be consistent with the Mixed Use zoning designation; Establish a Master Plan Overlay District for the project site on the Development District Map in accordance with Section 17.20.030 of the Development Code; at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Grove Avenue - • APN: 0207-011-35, 36, 41, 43 and 45. Related Files: General Plan Amendment DRC2006-00223, Development Code Amendment DRC2007-00029, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18179, Development Review DRC2006-00341. DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DRC2007-00029 -ARBORS AT ROUTE 66, LLC - A request to change the table for the Bear Gulch Mixed-Use area contained in Development Code Section 17.32.020 C.3 to increase the maximum number of dwelling units from 231 to 304 - APN: 0207-011-35, 36, 41, 43, and 45. Related Files: General Plan Amendment DRC2006-00223, Development District Amendment DRC2006-00350, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18179, Development Review DRC2006-00341. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2006-00341 -ARBORS AT ROUTE 66 LLC -Master Plan for two 2-story office buildings, 7 Live/Work units, 68 town homes, and 23 single-family residences at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Grove Avenue in the Mixed Use Zone of Subarea 1 of the Foothill Boulevard Districts. APN: 0207-011-35, 36, 41; 43, 44, and 45. Related Files: General Plan Amendment DRC2006-00223, Development District Amendment DRC2006-00350, Development Code Amendment DRC2007-00029, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18179. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18179 -ARBORS AT ROUTE 66 LLC -Condominium subdivision of two lots with office condominiums in two office buildings on Lot 1, and residential condominiums m 7 Live/Work units, 68 town homes, and 23 single-family residences on Lot 2 at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Grove Avenue m the Mixed Use Zone of Subarea 1 of the Foothill Boulevard Districts. APN: 0207-011-35, 36, 41, 43, 44, and 45. Related Files General Plan Amendment DRC2006-00223, Development District • Amendment DRC2006-00350, Development Code Amendment DRC2007-00029, and Development Review DRC2006-00341. C,D,E,F,G 64 DRC ACTION AGENDA PRJ2006-00094, DRC2006-00223, DRC2006-00350, DRC2007-00029, SUBTT18179, AND DRC2006-00341 • March 20, 2007 Page 2 Development Request Parameters: The overall project request aims to develop six parcels as one mixed-use development. The project has several components which require discussion to better exhibit the design issues• This project includes six parcels which are proposed to be included in a mixed use development. The four easterly parcels are now General Plan designated as Open Space but within a Low Residential Development District and are outside the Foothill Boulevard Districts. The General Plan Amendment and Development District and Code Amendments, in part, would include them into the same Foothill Boulevard District and Mixed Use land use designation and Development District as the other two parcels to allow for a comprehensive development pattern. 2. The General Plan and the Foothill Boulevard Districts Chapter of the Development Code establish, through the use of a Land Use Mix Table, a maximum of 231 dwelling units for the Bear Gulch Mixed Use area. The applicant is requesting to construct 98 dwelling ants in the proposed project, but 206 units have already been entitled for construction in the Bear Gulch Mixed Use area on other parcels. The General Plan and the Development Code must be amended to allow a maximum of at least 304 dwelling units for this proposal. 3. A Master Plan Overlay District is requested to be established for the project site. The designation and the Master Plan itself will allow flexibility in the site planning for the site to address unique design-related issues where development policy may not provide the best • solution. 4. The project proposes a subdivision for condominium purposes across two lots. Lot 1 provides for the subdivision of office space in the approximately 12,600 square foot office buildings; Lot 2 provides for the subdivision of the various dwelling units into 98 residential condominiums - 7 live/work units, 68 townhouses and 23 detached single-family units. 5. Design review of the buildings and their relationship with the surrounding streetscape and the requirements of Foothill Boulevard Districts Subarea 1. The project site and the proposed development pose several challenges. The traffic issues with relation to Grove Avenue, the Foothill and Grove intersection, and the impacts on Red Hill Country Club Drive have raised the most questions from neighbors making inquiries to staff. In addition, the Mixed Use and the Master Plan issues for reducing some of the development standards are important for discussion. Staff Comments: The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion. Mayor Issues. The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this project: C C, D, E,F,G 65 DRC ACTION AGENDA PRJ2006-00094, DRC2006-00223, DRC2006-00350, DRC2007-00029, SUBTT18179, AND DRC2006-00341 March 20, 2007 Page 3 1. Traffic -The proposed project has been analyzed by the applicant's traffic engineers, and the resulting report has been reviewed and accepted by the City's Traffic Engineer. Based on standard industry standards, the project will generate 1,130 daily trips if the office buildings are medical The project will generate 82 two-way trips in the a.m. peak hour and 111 two-way trips in the p m. peak hour, both significantly less than the 250 two way trips which would trigger a Traffic Impact Analysis required under the county's Congestion Management Program. The project proposes two ingress/egress points The point along Grove Avenue is full access for all users and tenants in both the residential portion and the office portion. The point along Red Hill Country Club Drive is for emergency access only and will be gate-protected for that purpose The traffic generated by the project will access the site through the intersection of Foothill Boulevard and Grove Avenue. The daily trips and the peak hour trips will not increase the Level of Service (LOS) beyond the acceptable LOS C that it operates under today. Substantial concern has been voiced over the traffic impact of the project on trips that will use the local residential streets on Red Hill to shortcut up or down from Base Line Road. The traffic analysis, based on industry standards, City-generated traffic counts from • April 2006 and other information provided by the City's Traffic Engineer, shows that the project will generate an additional four (4) a.m. peak-hour trips and zero (0) p m. peak-hour trips with a total daily traffic increase of 0.6 percent over current levels. Part of these numbers are based on the Central School District information that the district anticipates the project to generate approximately 17 (total) children (K-8), some of whom will attend Valle Vista School on Red Hill. Based on current information on the Central School District website, enrollment for this school site is projected to drop. The applicant instructed their traffic engineers to prepare analysis of alternate development scenarios as part of their study. With the residential unit count and the amount of either medical office or retail uses more m keeping with the mix anticipated m the General Plan, the subject proposal would generate about 17 percent of what an office-heavy scenario would generate and about 28 percent of what aretail-heavy scenario would generate. Staff analysis of an additional scenario that uses the current residential unit limitation of 25 single-family units and medical office buildings up to the 70 percent mix targeted in the General Plan, at the same efficiency obtained by the applicant's proposal, show that the subject proposal would generate about 44 percent of what this conservative scenario would generate. 2. Mixed Use - The General Plan designates large portions of the western end of Foothill Boulevard as Mixed Use, including the subject site. This area is known alternately as the Western Foothill Corridor -Western Gateway and as Bear Gulch. The discussion for this area in the General Plan focuses on the mix of uses anticipated based on the location, the anticipated uses, the (then) current level of commercial vitality, and the types of activity expected to occur there • C,D,E,F,G 66 DRC ACTION AGENDA PRJ2006-00094, DRC2006-00223, DRC2006-00350, DRC2007-00029, SUBTT18179, AND DRC2006-00341 March 20, 2007 Page 4 The mix of uses is shown in the following table: TABLE III-7 WESTERN FOOTHILL CORRIDOR -WESTERN GATEWAY • Acreage Range Percent Average Density (du/acre) Estimated "Most Case" Land Use Range Dwelling Units Acres/Dwelling Units (du) Commercial -retail, 50 percent - 27 5 - 38 5 acres 38 5 acres service 70 percent Commercial, tourist commercial, office (commercial and professional Residential 30 percent - 16 5 - 27 5 acres @ 14 du/acre' 16 5 acres ~ 14 du/acre' 50 percent 231 to 385 dwelling units 231 dwelling units TOALS 100 percent 55 acres 55 acres 1 Indicates target density not a range Actual density may increase up to 20 du/acre as long as the total of 231 dwelling units is not exceeded As shown, the anticipated mix is skewed toward commercial uses rather than residential In addition, the broad ranges in the land use categories that were targeted for this area are noted in the General Plan to "allow a high degree of flexibility and responsiveness to the • market." The applicant contends that the market Is such that skewing their project to the most residentially heavy side of these ranges is still far from what the market will accept. Retail uses are not appropriate for this location considering the nearby vacancies. The applicant also contends that the traffic impacts if the site was developed within the General Plan ranges would be too severe to be acceptable to the neighbors and to the City. In addition to market demands recognized by the General Plan, the limitation on the number of dwelling units in the entire area creates a burden on the reasonable development of the site. The chart (and a similar chart in the Development Code) shows that there can be no more than 231 dwelling units In the entire area This limit has been approached by the cumulative entitlement of 206 dwelling units in Bear Gulch. The remaining 25 units that would be permitted under this area-wide limitation would restrict the developer to filling as little as 3 acres of the 10 acre site with these 25 units and the balance of the land would go to commercial uses. The request is to increase the limitation on the number of dwelling units by 73 units to 304 to permit the proposed project. 3. Master Planning -The General Plan and the Development Code both address the use of a Master Plan Overlay District as a way to attend to the unique and special characteristics of a development site to solve problems and address "Issues that may not be readily resolved through conventional zoning designations or site development standards." (Section 111.2.4.1, Rancho Cucamonga General Plan ) The proposed project Is designed to seamlessly blend the several use types together while allowing for sufficient segregation to prevent any incompatibilities In doing so, the applicant has been able to meet most all of the development standards for the applicable zones and uses. However, the applicant Is proposing that several development standards be relaxed in order to provide a better site design. C, D, E,F,G 67 DRC ACTION AGENDA PRJ2006-00094, DRC2006-00223, DRC2006-00350, DRC2007-00029, SUBTT18179, AND DRC2006-00341 • March 20, 2007 Page 5 As provided on a comprehensive comparison table (attached), the applicant is requesting the following: • Average setbacks be allowed m lieu of the required discreet setback calculation for units along Red Hill Country Club Drive and the office building at the corner. • Height limit setback for the office building in the Foothill Boulevard District Parkway designation be reduced along both Foothill Boulevard and Grove Avenue. • The private open space requirement for the town homes and Live/Work units be relaxed to allow an average calculation for the units for the ground floor and allow the upstairs space to be counted. • That the building separation measurement between the town home buildings and the driveway curb be reduced to 11 feet for both two- and three-story portions of the town home buildings The applicant justifies the reduced setbacks, reduced separation from the driveway curbs, and the reduced ground floor open space for the town homes by explaining that the town home clusters better effect the layout design for the site. By affecting the clusters of town homes, a more autonomous relationship is made for each cluster and additional open space is provided in more meaningful locations, not only in the large common open space areas, but also in the court spaces enveloped within each town home cluster The applicant also justifies the flexibility for the office building by noting that the siting of the building meets the overarching intent of the Foothill Boulevard-Historic Route 66 Visual Improvement Plan (VIP). This plan specifies the design requirements for the entry gateways to the City on Foothill Boulevard including various street furniture and other accents. For the Western Gateway at Grove Avenue, the plan states that this intersection "should incorporate large accent setbacks" (Section III.A). The office building design provides a symmetrical L-shaped arrangement with an attractive entry toward the corner that is set back a significant distance. However, by locating and arranging the building on the site to achieve the requirements of the VIP, it does require that some of the development standards be relaxed. The Master Plan Overlay District would allow such flexibility. Secondary Issues: Once all of the mayor issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues: 1. The applicant has made a serious effort to comply with the architectural requirements for the Foothill Boulevard Districts including compatibility with the community design palette for the subarea. Staff finds the design mixture appropriate Design Review Committee Action: Members Present: Munoz, Stewart, Diaz Staff Planner. Vance Pomeroy • The Committee recommended that a task force consisting of, at minimum, two members of the City Council and two Planning Commissioners be formed to provide a broader opportunity for C, D, E,F,G 68 DRC ACTION AGENDA PRJ2006-00094, DRC2006-00223, DRC2006-00350, DRC2007-00029, SUBTT18179, AND DRC2006-00341 March 20, 2007 Page 6 constructive design input In lieu of this opportunity for correction to the project, the Committee continued the item to give the applicant an opportunity to revise the project based on the following comments: 1. Work on the office building design Amore substantial corner treatment that provides critical visual focus for the entire project site is needed An increase in the height of the corner element may be an important change and allowable under the Master Plan Overlay review. Also, the architectural cues given by the Magic Lamp and the Sycamore Inn should be better represented m the design of the building, including the color palette, the use of materials such as wrought iron, and other characteristic features. 2. Provide better exhibits to demonstrate the broad design aspects of the development: more streetscapes, view line studies (especially as they pertain to the three-story elements), perspective studies of the town home clusters, etc. 3. The Committee recognizes that the project exceeds the minimum parking requirements, but sees a potential parking conflict between the office and the residential portions of the project with respect to the use of the office parking area by residents. Clear and enforceable language in the Covenants, Conditions & Restrictions (CC&Rs) for both portions should be included to resolve this issue while making allowances for off-hour use of the office parking area by residents during non-business hours. Bring that language back for staff and Committee review. 4. The live/work units have some potential to create conflicts with the office uses and the residential uses. Clear and enforceable language in the CC&Rs is needed to control these potentially incompatible uses and prevent unacceptable parking problems that may result. Bring that language back for staff and Committee review. 5. The Committee accepted the traffic report conclusions respecting the quantity and flow of traffic generated by the project. However, the Committee believed that southbound Grove Avenue left-turn movements onto eastbound Foothill Boulevard would benefit from a signal-controlled left-turn lane. • • C, D, E,F,G 69 DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS • 7 30 p m. Vance Pomeroy May 1, 2007 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2006-00223 - ARBORS AT ROUTE 66 LLC - A request to change the land use designation for four parcels on Red Hill Country Club Drive from Open Space to Mixed Use to be consistent with the Mixed Use land use designation at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Grove Avenue, to add these same four parcels to Section 2.5 5 4 Western Gateway in the Bear Gulch area, and to establish a Master Plan Overlay Distract for this protect site on the Land Use Plan in accordance with Section 111.2.4.1 of the General Plan -APN: 0207-011-35, 36, 41, 43, 44, and 45. Related Files: Development District Amendment DRC2006-00350, Development Code Amendment DRC2007-00029, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18179, and Development Review DRC2006-00341. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT -ARBORS AT ROUTE 66 LLC - A request to change the zoning for four parcels on Red Hill Country Club Drive from Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) to Mixed Use to be consistent with the Mixed Use zoning designation; establish a Master Plan Overlay Distract for the protect site on the Development District Map in accordance with Section 17.20.030 of the Development Code, located at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Grove Avenue -APN: 0207-011-35, 36, 41, 43, 44, and 45. Related Files: General Plan Amendment DRC2006-00223, Development Code Amendment DRC2007-00029, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18179, and Development Review DRC2006-00341. DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DRC2007-00029 -ARBORS AT ROUTE 66, LLC - A request to change the table for the Bear Gulch Mixed-Use area contained m Development Code . Section 17.32.020.0.3 to include the "Most Case" column found in the General Plan Table III-7 - APN: 0207-011-35, 36, 41, 43, 44, and 45. Related Files: General Plan Amendment DRC2006-00223, Development District Amendment DRC2006-00350, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18179, and Development Review DRC2006-00341. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18179 -ARBORS AT ROUTE 66 LLC -Condominium subdivision of two lots with office condominiums m two office buildings on Lot 1 and residential condominiums in 7 Live/Work units, 68 town homes, and 23 single-family residences on Lot 2 at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Grove Avenue m the Mixed Use Zone of Subarea 1 of the Foothill Boulevard Districts. APN: 0207-011-35, 36, 41, 43, 44, and 45. Related Files General Plan Amendment DRC2006-00223, Development District Amendment DRC2006-00350, Development Code Amendment DRC2007-00029, and Development Review DRC2006-00341 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2006-00341 -ARBORS AT ROUTE 66 LLC - A master plan for two 2-story office buildings, 7 Live/Work units, 68 town homes, and 23 single-family residences at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Grove Avenue in the Mixed Use Zone of Subarea 1 of the Foothill Boulevard Districts, including a change in the use combinations and proportions found in General Plan Table III-7 APN: 0207-011-35, 36, 41, 43, 44, and 45. Related Files: General Plan Amendment DRC2006-00223, Development District Amendment DRC2006 00350, Development Code Amendment DRC2007-00029, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18179. Background: The Design Review Committee continued this protect from the March 20, 2007, meeting with the following recommendations: 1. Work on the design of the office building Amore substantial corner treatment that provides critical visual focus for the entire protect site is needed. An increase in the height ~CN~g~r S C, D, E,F,G 70 DRC ACTION AGENDA DRC2006-00233, DR000350, DRC2007-00029, SUBTT18179, AND DRC2006-00341 - ARBORS AT ROUTE 66 LLC May 1, 2007 Page 2 of the corner element may be an important change and allowable under the Master Plan Overlay review. Also, the architectural cues given by the Magic Lamp and the Sycamore Inn should be better represented in the design of the building including the color palette, the use of materials such as wrought iron, and other characteristic features. 2. Provide better exhibits to demonstrate the broad design aspects of the development. more streetscapes, view line studies (especially as they pertain to the three-story elements), perspective studies of the town home clusters, etc. 3. The Committee recognizes that the project exceeds the minimum parking requirements, but sees a potential parking conflict between the office and the residential portions of the project with respect to the use of the office parking area by residents. Clear and enforceable language in the Covenants, Conditions & Restrictions (CC&Rs) for both portions should be included to resolve this issue while making allowances for off-hour use of the office parking area by residents during non-business hours. Bring that language back for staff and Committee review. 4. The live/work units have some potential to create conflicts with the office uses and the residential uses. Clear and enforceable language in the CC&Rs is needed to control these potentially incompatible uses and prevent unacceptable parking problems that may result. Bring that language back for staff and Committee review. In addition, the Committee accepted the traffic report conclusions respecting the quantity and flow of traffic generated by the project. However, the Committee believed that the southbound Grove Avenue left-turn movements onto the eastbound Foothill Boulevard would benefit from a signal-controlled left-turn lane. Staff Comments: The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion. Major Issues• The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this project• 1. The applicant has re-designed the office building to incorporate the comments of the Committee. The center/corner rotunda massing has been emphasized by increasing its height and providing visual clues that accentuate its verticality including roof stepping, materials and window shapes Further increases in the prominence of the corner could be derived by increasing height, bolder colors and materials, or more intense design features; these could take the design away from the direction the Committee intended. Secondary Issues. Once all of the major issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues. The applicant has worked with staff on the CC&R language to assure residential usage of the office parking during off hours and the use of the parking lot by the live/work businesses. • • • C, D, E,F,G 71 DRC ACTION AGENDA DRC2006-00233, DRC00350, DRC2007-00029, SUBTT18179, AND DRC2006-00341 - ARBORS AT ROUTE 66 LLC • May 1, 2007 Page 3 Design Review Committee Action: Members Present: Munoz, Stewart, Diaz Staff Planner. Vance Pomeroy The Committee recommended approval of the protect to the Planning Commission subtect to the following. 1. The applicant should be conditioned to provide studies necessary to determine if a protected left-turn signal for southbound Grove Avenue onto Foothill Boulevard is required and install it subject to CalTrans approval, if necessary. 2. The applicant shall provide a thorough and complete computer-generated three-dimensional "drive-through" of the protect showing of the various aspects both on the inside and the outside, including live/work units, parking areas, office building, single-family units, multiple-family units, courtyards, open space, street views, etc. The moving picture file must be compatible with the City's systems. 3. The office building shall incorporate attractive security measures in the design of any gates for the office building and the surrounding area. • 4 The office building should include significant off-lighting accents. A tasteful and innovative sign program designed within the design constraints of the Foothill Boulevard/Route 66 Visual Improvement Plan must be an important part of the final design. • C, D, E,F,G 72 • • • ~/ ~~ O L a AA '/1 v/ ~^^ ~L O }~~[ L~ `V N (~ a ._ .a ~ ~" ~ p 0 O ~CH~B rf ~ N f- ~ M O d' T T LCD - r ~ t0 O O (~ ~ ~ v ~ V ~ C~ ~ ~ V ~ ~ 0 ~ o ~ ~ _ ~, c~ 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ V •- ~ ~ ~ o ~ o p .c o ~ ~ N .c o ~ O ~ ~ ~' a ~ ~ O a ~ N .a J = :~, ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ _ ~~, ~ ~ ~ O a~ ~j -~ ~ ._ °' ~ N 'L N a O C,D,E,F,G 73 o = U ~ ~ ', . ~ ~ G~ •- 3 ~ ~ ro ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N ~ ~ L J \ L o J d- ~ c~i~ c U ~ v O '~ ~ J ~ a ~ o ~ ~ J v a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ °o ~ ° ~. o °o o .~ ~ + ~+ ~ a ~ a L ~_ W 0 0 U 0 ARBORS AT ROUTE 66 MIXED-USE PROJECT TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS City of Rancho Cucamonga Prepared for C ARBORS AT ROUTE 66, LLC Prepared by . . CONSULTING 14725 ALTON PARKWAY, IRVINE, CALIFORNIA 92618-2027 CONTACT BOB MATSON 949.472 3505 bobmatson@rbf com March 20, 2007 JN 10-105035 • ~~~~~ ~ C, D, E,F,G 74 • TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .............................................................. ....... ...............................1 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................... ............................ 2 Study Area ............................................................................................... ............................... 2 Intersection Analysis Methodology ............................................................... ...............................2 Intersection Performance Criteria .. ............................................................. ............................... 3 Intersection Thresholds of Significance ...................................................... ........................ ... 3 EXISTING CONDITIONS ............................................................................ ........ ..................3 Roadway Descriptions .................................... .................................... ..... ... 3 Existing Conditions Traffic Volumes ........................................................... ...............................4 Existing Conditions Peak Hour Intersection LOS ....................................... .............................4 PROPOSED PROJECT ........................................................................... .......................... 4 • Forecast Trip Generation of proposed project ........................................... ........... ................5 Forecast Trip Distribution of Proposed Project ............................................. ... .........................5 Forecast Trip Assignment of Proposed Project ......................................... ............................ 6 FORECAST EXISTING WITH PROJECT CONDITIONS . .......................................................6 Forecast Existing With Project Conditions Traffic Volumes ......................... ........................6 Forecast Existing With Project Conditions Intersection Peak Hour LOS .....................................6 TRIP GENERATION OF ALTERNATIVE LAND USE SCENARIOS ........ ... ..... ....................7 FORECAST VALLE VISTA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL RELATED TRIPS ..... ........................... 9 MITIGATION MEASURES ...................................................................... ............ ....... .10 CONCLUSIONS ............... ................................ .............,................. ......................10 APPENDIX A EXISTING COUNT DATA APPENDIX B LOS ANALYSIS SHEETS APPENDIX C CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT LETTER , • C,D,E,F,G 75 • LIST OF TABLES Table 1 LOS & Delay Ranges for Signalized Intersections ...................................................3 Table 2 Existing Conditions AM & PM Peak Hour Intersection LOS... ........................ ..4 Table 3 ITE Trip Rates of Proposed Project ..................................... ............. ................ ..5 Table 4 Forecast Trip Generation of Proposed Project ............... .... .. ......................... ..5 Table 5 Forecast Trip Percent Distribution of Proposed Project ....... ............................... . 6 Table 6 Forecast Existing With Project Conditions AM & PM Peak Hour Intersection LOS ................................................. ................................................................. 6 Table 7 ITE Trip Rates of Land Use Scenarios .................................................................... . 8 Table 8 Forecast Trip Generation of Land Use Scenarios ...... .......................................... ..8 Table 9 Forecast Elementary School-Related Trips Students from Proposed Project .......... ..9 Table 10 Red Hill Country Club Drive Average Daily Traffic ................................................ 10 LIST OF EXHIBITS Follows Page • • Exhibit 1 Regional Project Location ..................................................................................2 Exhibit 2 Proposed Project Site Location ..........................................................................2 Exhibit 3 Study Intersection Location .............. ..... .............................,........................ 2 Exhibit 4 Existing AM/PM Peak Hour Intersection Volumes ............................. .... ........4 Exhibit 5 Existing Study Intersection/Roadway Geometry .................................................4 Exhibit 6 Proposed Project Site Plan ........................................................ .. ...........4 Exhibit 7 AM Forecast Percent Trip Distribution of Proposed Project .................................5 Exhibit 8 PM Forecast Percent Trip Distribution of Proposed Project ...............................5 Exhibit 9 Forecast AM/PM Peak Hour Trip Assignment of Proposed Project ................. ..6 Exhibit 10 Forecast Existing With Project AM/PM Peak Hour Intersection Volumes .............6 C, D, E,F,G 76 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This study analyzes the forecast traffic impacts associated with the proposed Arbors at Route 66 Mixed-Use project located at the northeast corner of the Foothill Boulevard/Grove Avenue intersection in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The proposed project consists of 12,610 square feet of general office, 23 single-family dwelling units, and 75 townhouse style condominium dwelling units. The project site currently contains agricultural land uses and three single-family dwelling units, all of which will be displaced by the proposed project Site access to the proposed mixed-use project is planned via a full access driveway at Grove Avenue with an emergency access only to Red Hill Country Club Drive. It is worth noting, since the proposed Arbors at Route 66 Mixed-Use project is forecast to generate less than 250 two-way a.m peak hour trips (69 two-way trips in the a.m. peak hour) and less than 250 two-way p.m. peak hour trips (82 two-way trips in the p.m. peak hour), preparation of a SANBAG Congestion Management Program (CMP) TIA is not required for the proposed project according to CMP TIA guidelines. The Foothill Boulevard (SR-66)/Grove Avenue intersection is currently operating at an acceptable LOS (LOS D or better) according to City of Rancho Cucamonga performance criteria. • The proposed project is forecast to generate approximately 799 daily trips, which includes approximately 69 a.m. peak hour trips and approximately 82 p.m. peak hour trips. This analysis conservatively assumes no trip generation reduction associated with the three displaced single- family dwelling units and commercial activity related to the strawberry farm sales and Christmas tree sales. With the addition of project-generated trips, the Foothill Boulevard (SR-66)/Grove Avenue intersection is forecast to continue operating at LOS C, an acceptable LOS (LOS D or better) for forecast existing with project conditions according to City of Rancho Cucamonga performance criteria. A 0.44 percent increase in daily traffic on Red Hill Country Club Drive is forecast to occur related to dropping off/picking up elementary school age students forecast to be generated by the proposed project Based on City-established thresholds of significance, the addition of project-generated trips at the Foothill Boulevard (SR-66)/Grove Avenue intersection is forecast to not result in any significant impacts. Based on City of Rancho Cucamonga thresholds of significance, no mitigation measures are required for the proposed project. The proposed project is forecast to generate less traffic as compared to three alternative allowable land use scenarios. • C,D,E,F,G 77 INTRODUCTION This study analyzes the forecast traffic impacts associated with the proposed Arbors at Route 66 Mixed-Use project located at the northeast corner of the Foothill Boulevard/Grove Avenue intersection m the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The proposed project consists of 12,610 square feet of general office, 23 single-family dwelling units, and 75 townhouse style condominium dwelling units. The project site currently contains agricultural land uses and three single-family dwelling units, all of which will be displaced by the proposed project. Site access to the proposed mixed-use project is planned via a full access driveway at Grove Avenue with an emergency access only to Red Hill Country Club Drive. Exhibit 1 shows the regional project location. Exhibit 2 shows the location of the project site. It is worth noting, since the proposed Arbors at Route 66 Mixed-Use project is forecast to generate less than 250 two-way a.m. peak hour trips (69 two-way taps in the a.m. peak hour) and less than 250 two-way p.m. peak hour trips (82 two-way trips in the p.m. peak hour}, preparation of a SANBAG Congestion Management Program (CMP) TIA is not required for the proposed project according to CMP TIA guidelines. Study Area City of Rancho Cucamonga staff identified the following intersection for analysis in this study: • Foothill Boulevard (SR-66}/Grove Avenue (Signalized). Exhibit 3 shows the location of the study intersection. As requested by City of Rancho Cucamonga staff, the study intersection is analyzed for the following study scenarios: • Existing Conditions; and • Forecast Existing With Project Conditions. Intersection Analysis Methodology Level of service (LOS) is commonly used as a qualitative description of intersection operation and is based on the type of traffic control and delay experienced at the intersection. The 2000 Highway Capacity Manua! (HCM) analysis methodology for Signalized Intersections is utilized to determine the operating LOS of the study intersection. The 2000 HCM analysis methodology describes the operation of an intersection using a range of LOS from LOS A (free-flow conditions) to LOS F (severely congested conditions), based on the corresponding ranges of stopped delay experienced per vehicle for unsignalized intersections shown in Table 1. C, 2 C, D, E,F,G 78 W J 0 U 5 _ SAN BERNARDINO CO ~ _ LOS ANGELES CO w 4~ W m W ~" J w a J ~> Q W w 0 Z_z Q ~ Q ~z w m 0 x U 2 !~ °~ Q6 -_' - 00 W H N H~ V W O a S07 a} v~ I } ~ I c~ ~z a~ a ~ ~ o UI O U 2 ~~~ ~IW O m l~ Q hl I , /~ / ' / I ~ _ O } W J J J ~~ w zQ a ~ ~ ~ O ~ >_ ~ LL ~ I ~ - '/ J~ GO p p ~~S~j~G z P~J/p,P~ ~ = o p ~ 1 ~ / /I ~ J'I o >~ I ~ > J J W C,D,E,F,G 79 C O +~ c~ V J V ~O L C O .~ g U w W F- 0 Wfo °O-lo ~ ~ w w > o 1 ~~+~ x W 0 N `a w [, ~/ ~ r=, u7 e 0 _s m m 3 x (9 ' U O O ^ Z • c 0 m U N O 0.. ~ ~ C ~ N m , J ~ (Q ' U O O Z ~ N a.+ ~ X () W .,.r ~.+ V ~_ .O L Q. 0 Q. 0 L 0 N a w m N O N a_ u F- 0 N O 0 'm 0 9 ~~ 7 C,D,E,F,G 80 C,D,E,F,G 81 t0 'D C C O 7 O m N N ~ ~ C U J. O 7 ~ ~ N ~ m ~ ~ 1 . J ~ O w O Z ~ M 0 "~ .a ~-+ ~ X 0 J V N L .F+ .~-+ g a N 'a w N • m 0 a F- 0 0 'm m v 9 x s • Table 1 LOS & Delay Ranges for Signalized Intersections LOS Delay (seconds) A < 10.0 B 10 1 to < 20,0 C 20.1 to < 35 0 D 35 1 to < 55,0 E 55 1 to < 80 0 F >aoo Source: Transportation Research Board, Highway Capacity Manual, HCM 2000 Edition (Washington D C., 2000), Level of service is based on the average stopped delay per vehicle for all movements of signalized intersections. Intersection Performance Criteria The City of Rancho Cucamonga target for peak hour intersection operation is LOS D or better. Intersection Thresholds of Significance • To determine whether the addition of project-generated trips results in a significant impact at a study intersection, and thus requires mitigation, the City of Rancho Cucamonga utilizes the following threshold of significance: A significant project-related impact occurs if the addition of project-generated trips causes an intersection operating at LOS D or better to operate at a deficient LOS (LOS E or F); or if a project adds traffic to any intersection operating at an unacceptable LOS (LOS E or F). EXISTING CONDITIONS Roadway Descriptions The characteristics of the roadway system in the vicinity of the project area are described below. Foothill Boulevard (SR-66) m the project vicinity is a four-lane divided roadway with a continuous left-turn lane trending in an east-west direction. It should be noted that City of Rancho Cucamonga is planning to widen Foothill Boulevard in the project vicinity to a six-lane divided roadway with a landscaped raised median Grove Avenue north of Foothill Boulevard in the project vicinity is a four-lane undivided roadway trending in a north-south direction. Grove Avenue transitions into atwo-lane undivided 3 C, D, E,F,G 82 roadway north of the project site. South of Foothill Boulevard, Grove Avenue is a four-lane divided roadway with araised/painted median. Red Hill Country Club Drive is a two-lane undivided roadway trending in a north-south direction Red Hill Country Club Drive terminates on the south at Foothill Boulevard. Existing Conditions Traffic Volumes This analysis utilizes City-provided a.m. and p.m. peak hour intersection movement counts taken in April 2006. The a.m. peak period intersection counts were taken from 7:00 a.m, to 9:00 a m ,and the p m. peak period intersection counts were taken from 4:00 p.m. to 6.00 p m. The counts used in this analysis were taken from the highest hour within the peak period counted. Exhibit 4 shows existing a.m. and p.m. peak hour volumes at the study intersections; detailed traffic count data is contained m Appendix A. Exhibit 5 shows existing study intersection/roadway circulation geometry. Existing Conditions Peak Hour Intersection LOS Table 2 summarizes existing conditions a.m. and p.m. peak hour LOS of the Foothill Boulevard (SR-66)/Grove Avenue intersection; detailed LOS analysis sheets are contained in Appendix B. Table 2 Existing Conditions AM & PM Peak Hour Intersection LOS Stud Intersection AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour y Delay LOS Delay LOS Foothill Blvd (SR-66)/Grove Ave 21.6 C 24 4 C Note: Delay is shown in seconds per vehicle. As shown in Table 2, the Foothill Boulevard (SR-66)/Grove Avenue intersection is currently operating at an acceptable LOS (LOS D or better) according to City of Rancho Cucamonga performance criteria. PROPOSED PROJECT The proposed Arbors at Route 66 Mixed-Use project located at the northeast corner of the Foothill Boulevard/Grove Avenue intersection in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The proposed project consists of 12,610 square feet of general office, 23 single-family dwelling units, and 75 townhouse style condominium dwelling units. The project site currently contains agricultural land uses and three single-family dwelling units, all of which will be displaced by the proposed project. Site access to the proposed mixed-use project is planned via a full access driveway at Grove Avenue with an emergency access only to Red Hill Country Club Drive. Exhibit 6 shows the proposed project site plan. • • 4 C, D, E,F,G 83 • • E Z` >° v ~ c ~ 7 U O N m ` N ~ C U 0 a ~ ' J ~ (0 U C~ O O Z N d' r ~ x .~ W O V N L L 0 C~ G C1 G a ~o N ~~ N a w .X W m v 0 N a L 0 N O O m v g 2 C,D,E,F,G 84 a.+ d 3 ca 0 0 m L d.+ ++ .1..+ N .X W I~ 0 N a w • c 0 U N f6 h ~ ~ ~ O O ~ C Q. Q. O N ~ ~ N O 'O_ 'O ~ c b > > ~ J O C C ~ m U ~ ~ ~ ~ m d a~ N C C C C K ~ N t0 f0 W (n N ~ ~ J ~ C,D,E,F,G 85 • O • .~ O ^ Z N (d C 7 O m N U O a` C ~ x ~ W ~.+ V ~O ~. C.. '~ N O Q. O L a. n 0 0 N m b a t 'u c M 0 0 'm m 0 9 x _~ ^ Cn ^ O .~ O Z C,D,E,F,G 86 Forecast Trip Generation of proposed project To calculate trips forecast to be generated by the proposed project, institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation rates were used in this analysis. Table 3 summarizes iTE trip generation rates used to calculate the number of trips forecast to be generated by the proposed project. Table 3 ITE Trip Rates of Proposed Project AM Peak Hour Rates PM Peak Hour Rates Daily Land Use (ITE Code) Units In Out Total In Out Total Tnp Rate Single-Family Dwelling Units (210) du 0 19 0.56 0 75 0 64 0 37 1 01 9 57 Residential Condominwm/Townhouse (230) du 0.07 0 37 0 44 0 35 0 17 0 52 5 86 General Office (710) tsf 1 36 0 19 1 55 0 25 1 24 1 49 11 01 source zvv;~ ~ ~ t ~ rip ~eneranon naanua~, r" tamon. Note: du =Dwelling Unit; tsf =thousand square feet. Table 4 summarizes trips forecast to be generated by the proposed project utilizing the trip generation rates shown in Table 3 Table 4 Forecast Trip Generation of Proposed Project Land Use AM Peak Hour Trips PM Peak Hour Trips Daily In Out Total In Out Total Trips 23 Single-Family Dwelling Units 4 13 17 15 9 24 220 75 Condominium/Townhouse Dwelling Units 5 28 33 26 13 39 440 12,610 tsf General Office 17 2 19 3 16 19 139 Total Trip Generation 26 43 69 44 38 82 799 rvote: tst = tnousana square feet As shown in Table 4, the proposed project is forecast to generate approximately 799 daily trips, which Includes approximately 69 a.m. peak hour trips and approximately 82 p.m. peak hour trips. This analysis conservatively assumes no trip generation reduction associated with the three displaced single-family dwelling units and commercial activity related to the strawberry farm sales and Christmas tree sales. Forecast Trip Distribution of Proposed Project Exhibits 7 and 8 and Table 5 summarize the forecast trip percent distribution of project- generated trips based on discussions with City staff. • • 5 C,D,E,F,G 87 • • 0 c 01 r , ~.-- . __ . __ I ~ 0 I 1 i ~ V r 1-•--~--~--•--•--•--~--.: ~ o c 1 F.. z 1 1 o 1 1 ~ J _ 1 1 i ~ 1 ; ; 1 1 / ; 1 1 1 ; 1 L 1 ' 1 U ; ~ ~ `. _ N ', ; ~ ' ` 1 ; 0. ; s , 1 ; , ; 1 , • i ~ . i i ; 1 \ C i 1 1 1 O O ~ 1 O O i ~ ~~ / 1 ; .....~..~..........~.... ~. ~........~... ~.... ~~n\...A .~.~.~ ^ GROVE AVE ;,. 0 'd' ~' ~ o O ~t ~ o a co ~ ~ a c ,~ O ~ N m R ~ O N 0- f0 C fn C d U 7 aUi a o d o ~ ~ a a O 5 F= ~ ' I X rn 1 X J 1 ~o my °~n o N ~~ \° I~ co \° O ,...... ~ ..... ........ N O O N o o ~ L N U ~ ~ > 'm .~ z Q~ o W ~+ ~ N_ '~ N L N ~ 3 c ~o a Q co ~ d ~ ~ O N ~~~ .~ > r;o o °~ ~ ~ o U ~ oo ~, 0 0 0 o U LL m r.~ S o O v a~ N (n c~ a ~ N ~~„ N O ~ 7 N ~p O C ~ (ym~ O w U ~ ~ d a o 0 _N d C ~ p O a S ~ a 0 Z ~ a ~ n 'o O o0 d Z .- F- ~ ti V +. G1 :n O ~ L X ~ W N O L 0 .O rL+ N O a.+ L 0. Q L W ~+ L ~i L 2 S~ G~ a LX~ W U m 0 0 w m 9 9 x N O • O ^ Z C,D,E,F,G 88 C,D,E,F,G 89 C O L m (p L.-~ d d ~ 9 d C O 7 .fl _N 0 C N a a F- X Q fA C m N N tL T d Z d 8 3 N C N Q O C9 C O 0 c m ~, E•. 0 w ~ ~ c ~o . o' w a~ _o' N C O 7 d C _~ i ~ ~i _a , O ~ Z ~ d ~ o ~ Z N ' U Cn O O Z ~ ~ V ~ ~_ ~O = ~ x A~ W N O O L 0 .a ~L 0 ~~ A~A, 'W V L n. L~ r w ,~ N~ AV W L L Y c~ G ~a u H ~i 0 m m v 4 x i Table 5 Forecast Trip Percent Distribution of Proposed Project Project Tri p Percent Distribution Peak Hour To North From North To South From South To East From East To West From West Total AM 9% 15% 20% 20% 31% 25% 40% 40% 100% PM 0% 0% 20% 20% 40% 40% 40% 40% 100% Note: 1 =Via Red Hill Country Club Dnve As shown in Table 5, based on discussions with City staff, the proposed project is forecast to distribute approximately 20 percent of project trips to Grove Avenue south of Foothill Boulevard and approximately 80 percent of project trips to Foothill Boulevard. Forecast Trip Assignment of Proposed Project Exhibit 9 shows the corresponding assignment of project-generated peak hour trips assuming the percent trip distribution shown in Exhibits 7 and 8. FORECAST EXISTING WITH PROJECT CONDITIONS • Forecast Existing With Project Conditions Traffic Volumes Forecast existing with project conditions traffic volumes were derived by adding project- generated trips to existing traffic volumes. Exhibit 10 shows forecast existing with project conditions a m. and p.m. peak hour intersection volumes. Forecast Existing With Project Conditions Intersection Peak Hour LOS Table 6 summarizes the a.m. peak hour and p.m. peak hour LOS of the study intersections for forecast existing with project conditions; detailed HCM analysis sheets are contained in Appendix B Table 6 Forecast Existing With Project Conditions AM & PM Peak Hour Intersection LOS Existing Conditions Forecast Existing With Project Conditions Study Intersection AM PM AM pM Significant Impact? Peak Hour Peak Hour Peak Hour Peak Hour Delay -LOS Delay -LOS Delay -LOS Delay -LOS Foothill Blvd (SR-66)/Grove Ave 21.6 - C 24 4 - C 21 8 - C 24 5 - C No . Note: Delay is shown m seconds per vehicle. C, D, E,F,G 90 ~ ~ V ~.. ~_ ~_ ~O ~ L 0. 0 0 L a 0 c a~ E .N a ~. .L 0 0 Y N ~a N ~. • G 0. 1 a N V i.. N O E ~ ~ > 'D o c ~ o a~i ~ m y m 0 ~ w t C U ~ ~ a~ a o ~ a. 0 'D ~ x o ~ ! Xx~C o m ~ ~ ~ m J ~ 3 Z N ~ ~ O ^ Z C,D,E,F,G 91 • • ~: •-~ ; m i ~ ~ i ; V ~_.__.__~__.. _.__......,i' ~ i ~ ~ , Z ~ i ~ i O ~ U ~ ~ ~ J ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ ; r ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ; ~ U ~ 0 N ~~. '~. D. o ~~ m ,~ ' r o ~° ~M o• ~~~ ~~~ ~~ ~ ' ~ ' -..- ~ ~ L L6/6L ' ~~ GROVE AVE ggl~g6 J ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ 6l l/SO C -- szizb ~ ~~ N .- O ~~ h h ~ Z' >° ~ c ~ o CD N Q~ ~ U N d O a` ~ , J ~ U O O Z N o ~ ~_ ~ ~ x O w C O +r V d N L ~+ L Z C~ ^G Li. Q .N o ~O a L N t c :~ N .~ W R 'm OX W ~_ u 0 N O O 3 S ^ C,D,E,F,G 92 As shown in Table 6, with the addition of project-generated trips, the Foothill Boulevard (SR- • 66)/Grove Avenue intersection is forecast to continue operating at LOS C, an acceptable LOS (LOS D or better) for forecast existing with project conditions according to City of Rancho Cucamonga performance criteria. As also shown in Table 6 based on City-established thresholds of significance, the addition of project-generated trips at the Foothill Boulevard (SR-66)IGrove Avenue intersection is forecast to not result in any significant impacts. It is worth noting, the proposed project would have to generate 2,506 a.m. peak hour trips or 2,220 p.m. peak hour trips to reduce the Foothill BoulevardlGrove Avenue intersection to a deficient LOS (LOS E or worse). TRIP GENERATION OF ALTERNATIVE LAND USE SCENARIOS This section analyzes forecast trip generation associated with four allowable land use scenarios based on current zoning for the project site: • Proposed land use scenario: - 23 single-family dwelling units; - 75 condominium/townhouse dwelling units; and - 12,610 square feet general office. • • Original land use scenario: - 23 single-family dwelling units; - 75 condominium/townhouse dwelling units; and - 13,000 square feet medical office. • Alternative land use scenario 1: - 4single-family dwelling units; and - 180,000 square feet medical office. • Alternative land use scenario 2: - 25 condominium dwelling units; and - 95,000 square feet shopping center. To calculate trips forecast to be generated by the four land use scenarios, Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation rates were used in this analysis Table 7 summarizes /TE trip generation rates used to calculate the number of trips forecast to be generated by the four land use scenarios. 7 C,D,E,F,G 93 • Table 7 ITE Trip Rates of Land Use Scenarios - AM Peak Hour Rates PM Peak Hour Rates Daily Land Use (ITE Code) Units In Out Total In Out Total Trip Rate Single-Family Dwelling Units (210) du 0 19 0 56 0 75 0 64 0 37 1 01 9 57 Residential Condomirnum/Townhouse (230) du 0 07 0 37 0 44 0 35 0 17 0 52 5 86 General Office (710) tsf 1 36 0 19 1 55 0 25 1 24 1 49 11 01 Medical Office (720) tsf 1 96 0 52 2 48 1 00 2 72 3 72 36 13 Shopping Center (820) tsf 0 63 0 40 1 03 1 80 1 95 3 75 42 94 Source• 2003 /TE Tnp Generation Manuat, 7"' Edition. Note: du =Dwelling Urnt; tsf =thousand square feet Table 8 summarizes trips forecast to be generated by the four land use scenarios utilizing the trip generation rates shown in Table 7. Table 8 Forecast Trip Generation of Land Use Scenarios • Note: tsf =thousand square feet N/A =Not applicable. Land Use AM Peak Hour Trips PM Peak Hour Trips Daily Trips In Out Total In Out Total Proposed Land Use Scenario - 23 Single-Family Dwelling Urnts 4 13 17 15 9 24 220 - 75 Condominium/Townhouse Dwelling Urnts 5 28 33 26 13 39 440 - 12 610 tsf General Office 17 2 19 3 16 19 139 Total Proposed Project Trip Generation 26 43 69 44 38 82 799 Original Land Use Scenario - 23 Single-Family Dwelling Units 4 13 17 15 9 24 220 - 75 Condominium/Townhouse Dwelling Units 5 28 33 26 13 39 440 - 13 tsf Medical Office 25 7 32 13 35 48 470 Total OriginalPro~ectTripGeneration 34 48 82 54 57 111 1,130 Alternative Land Use Scenario 1 - 4Single-Family Dwelling Units 1 2 3 3 1 4 38 - 180 tsf Medical Office 353 94 447 180 490 670 6,503 Total Alternative 1 Trip Generation 354 96 450 183 491 674 6,541 Alternative Land Use Scenario 2 - 25 Condominium Dwelling Urnts 2 9 11 9 4 13 147 - 95 tsf Shopping Center 60 38 98 171 185 356 4,079 ITE Pass-by Reduction (-34% PM) N/A N/A N/A -58 -63 -121 -121 Total Alternative 2 Tnp Generation 62 47 109 122 126 248 4,105 As shown In Table 8, the proposed project is forecast to generate less traffic as compared to three alternative allowable land use scenarios 8 C,D,E,F,G 94 FORECAST VALLE VISTA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL RELATED TRIPS The proposed project is located within the Central School District and is served by the Valle Vista Elementary School located in the Red Hill neighborhood, Based on data provided by Central School District included in Appendix C, the proposed project is forecast to generate approximately 17 elementary school age students who would attend the Valle Vista Elementary School located in the Red Hill neighborhood. Based on data provided by Laidlaw Education Services staff, a school bus route currently serves students south of Foothill Boulevard and utilizes Red Hill Country Club Drive. Therefore, no new project-related bus trips are forecast to be generated by Valle Vista Elementary School students utilizing District-provided school buses. As shown in Table 9, assuming approximately 25 percent of the 17 project-related elementary school students are driven to school by guardians, approximately 16 elementary school-related daily trips will be added to Red Hill Country Club Drive by guardian transport of students to Valle Vista Elementary. Table 9 Forecast Elementary School-Related Trips Students from Proposed Project Number of Mode of Morn(ng' Forecast AfternoonZ Forecast Total Forecast Elementary School Transport Number of Trips Number of Trips Number of Trips Age Students (To & From School) (To & From School) (To & From School) 13 Driven by 0 0 0 school bus (See Note) 4 Driven by i3 g 16 guardians Total School Related Trips 16 1 =Morning taps forecast to occur during one hour between 7 a.m. and 9 p.m. 2 = Afternoon trips forecast to occur during one hour between 2 p.m. and 4 p.m. Note: Bus stop added to existing bus route currently traveling up and down Red Hill Country Club Drive and serving students south of Foothill Boulevard. As shown in Table 9, the proposed project is forecast to add 16 daily trips (8 trips forecast to occur during the a.m. peak hour and 8 trips forecast to occur during the afternoon non-peak period) to Red Hill Country Club Drive via guardian transport of students. Based on count data provided by City staff, Red Hill Country Club Drive north of Foothill Boulevard currently has an average daily traffic volume of 3,609 vehicles per day. Table 10 shows the increase in daily traffic volume on Red Hill Country Club Drive due to guardians dropping off/picking up elementary school age students forecast to be generated by the proposed project. • • 9 C, D,E,F,G 95 • • Table 10 Red Hill Country Club Drive Average Daily Traffic Forecast percent Existing Existing With Increase in Increase Roadway Segment Conditions Project Daily Traffic in Daily Daily Traffic Conditions Traffic Daily Traffic Red Hill Country Club Dr north of Foothill Blvd 3,609 3,625 16 0 44% As shown in Table 10, a 0.44 percent increase in daily traffic on Red Hill Country Club Drive is forecast to occur related to dropping off/picking up elementary school age students forecast to be generated by the proposed project. Based by information provided by Central Unified School District, the Valle Vista Elementary School enrollment during 2005/2006 academic school year was 524 students. Of the 524 Valle Vista Elementary School students, 236 students resided in the Red Hill area west of Vineyard Avenue-Carnelian Street, with the remaining 288 students living east of Vineyard Avenue- Carnelian Street. Based on City-provided information, approximately 651 residences exist in the Red Hill area west of Vineyard Avenue-Carnelian Street. MITIGATION MEASURES Based on City of Rancho Cucamonga thresholds of significance, no mitigation measures are required for the proposed project. CONCLUSIONS The Foothill Boulevard (SR-66)/Grove Avenue intersection is currently operating at an acceptable LOS (LOS D or better) according to City of Rancho Cucamonga performance criteria. The proposed project is forecast to generate approximately 799 daily trips, which includes approximately 69 a m. peak hour trips and approximately 82 p.m. peak hour trips This analysis conservatively assumes no trip generation reduction associated with the three displaced single- family dwelling units and commercial activity related to the strawberry farm sales and Christmas tree sales. 10 C, D, E,F,G 96 With the addition of project-generated trips, the Foothill Boulevard (SR-66)/Grove Avenue • intersection is forecast to continue operating at LOS C, an acceptable LOS (LOS D or better) for forecast existing with project conditions according to Clty of Rancho Cucamonga performance criteria. A 0.44 percent increase in daily traffic on Red Hill Country Club Drive is forecast to occur related to dropping off/picking up elementary school age students forecast to be generated by the proposed project. Based on City-established thresholds of significance, the addition of project-generated trips at the Foothill Boulevard (SR-66)/Grove Avenue Intersection is forecast to not result In any significant impacts. Based on City of Rancho Cucamonga thresholds of significance, no mitigation measures are required for the proposed project. The proposed project is forecast to generate less traffic as compared to three alternative allowable land use scenarios. H.\pdata\101050351TrafficlAdmm\5035_TIA_03-20-07 doc • 11 C, D, E,F,G 97 • ~, .~ APPENDIX A Existing Count Data C, D, E,F,G 98 • Intersection Counts C,D,E,F,G 99 Tuminp Movement Count Analysis TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT Prepared by G E Traffic Surveys PROJECT NAME, Rancho Cucenan9e CMP PROJECT NO DATE' 04/118008 N•S STREET' Grove Avenw E•W STREET Foothill Boulevard TIME NORTH BOUND SOUTH BOUND N•S EAST BOUND WEST BOUND E•W PED COUNT LEFT THRU RIGHT LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL NL SL EL WL 07'00-07,15 24 21 12 8 28 4 98 2 80 16 17 157 12 283 0 0 0 2 07.1507.30 47 18 14 18 23 9 119 2 113 18 18 227 8 385 0 0 0 0 07.30.07,45 59 19 ZZ 21 24 10 155 3 115 34 i6 200 7 377 0 0 1 2 07'45.08 00 37 12 24 i6 25 4 118 6 159 25 41 260 10 501 0 0 0 1 08 00.0815 35 12 18 28 29 7 130 8 180 37 31 189 10 455 0 0 0 0 08'15.08 30 48 25 14 13 19 4 122 3 132 29 36 212 19 431 0 0 0 2 09 3D•C9 45 34 20 21 22 17 5 1t9 4 113 Z2 23 167 10 339 0 0 0 0 t78 45-08 OD 49 15 19 10 19 4 110 1 122 18 23 174 13 391 0 0 0 4 1100-11.16 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 1115-11;30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1130.11,45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 11 a51 z ao 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o D o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1z•0012.1s o 0 0 o D o o a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 1572 30 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 D D D 0 D 0 0 0 1230.1245 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12.4513'00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16,OD-18 15 34 t8 21 23 15 6 118 7 311 ZB 24 Z37 19 627 0 0 2 4 16'151830 39 40 33 28 22 3 163 8 220 18 8 188 10 461 0 0 0 0 163016 45 47 31 31 22 23 5 158 3 257 20 30 186 20 516 0 0 1 2 18 45.171X1 44 l18 41 48 32 2 237 10 351 28 15 214 26 845 D 0 3 0 17 00-17 15 57 28 44 44 31 1 2D3 8 336 38 17 248 18 882 0 0 0 1 17 151730 38 52 30 34 28 7 1B9 11 317 AO 15 215 23 621 0 0 4 1 1730-1745 98 48 32 44 20 4 184 8 284 28 23 281 20 622 0 0 0 3 17 451800 49 84 2B 34 50 3 228 26 252 25 t8 201 15 538 0 0 D 0 PEAK-HOUR VOLUME ANALYSIS • CALCULAT ED PEAK HOUR VOLUM ES-AM ADJUSTED PEAK HOUR VO LUME S•AM 25 88 7B SR 6T SL SR ST SL 20 EL WR 48 EL WR 588 ET 07 30.08 30 WT B81 ET WT 125 ER WL 126 ER WL NL NT NR NL NT NR 178 88 78 rA rn AT D PEAK Hf111R vc1UIM >;-NnnN A0.11.1$TED PEAK {{QI,IR \/AI IIME S-NON 0 0 0 SR ST SL SR ST SL 0 CL Wf: 0 CL YJR 0 ET 11 001200 WT 0 ET WT 0 ER WL 0 ER WL NL NI NK NL NI NK 0 0 0 CALCULAT ED PEAK HOUR VOLUM ES•PM ADJUSTE D PEAK HOUR VO LUME S-PM 14 111 171 3R ST SL SR ST SL 32 EL WR 68 EL WR 1288 ET 18 4517 45 WT B36 ET WT 138 ER WL 70 ER WL NL NT NR NL NT NR 177 193 147 C,D,E,F,G 100 • ADT Counts C,D,E,F,G 101 Volumes for; Wednesday, October 04, 2006 Cfty: Rancho Cucamonga Project #• 06-3400-001 Location: Red Hill Country Ciub Dr e/o Grove Ave M Period NB SB EB WB _ _ PM_P~lod_ NB __ SB_ EB WB 00:04 3 0 12:00 25 19 00.15 4 1 12:15 35 29 00:30 1 0 12:30 31 19 00:45 1 9 1 2 11 12.45 26 119 30 97 216 01.00 2 0 13:00 29 30 01:15 3 0 13:15 30 22 01:30 2 2 13:30 24 40 01:45 3 10 0 2 12 13.45 20 103 30 122 225 02:00 2 0 14:00 33 25 02:15 2 0 14:15 26 23 02.30 1 2 14:30 27 31 02.45 3 8 1 3 11 14:45 36 122 24 103 225 03:00 D 0 15:00 34 29 03:15 1 0 15:15 35 23 03.30 2 1 15:30 46 28 03.45 0 3 4 5 8 15:45 31 146 23 103 249 04:00 2 2 16:00 41 33 04:15 1 2 16:15 51 25 04:30 2 6 16:30 40 29 04.45 5 10 3 13 23 16:45 44 176 30 117 243 05:00 1 4 17:00 71 32 05.15 4 9 17:15 67 29 05:30 6 it 17:30 55 24 05.45 9 ZO 13 37 57 17.45 40 233 36 121 354 06:00 9 5 18:00 47 29 06:15 B 26 16:15 47 30 06:30 11 29 18:30 41 24 - 06.45 11 39 38 48 137 18.45 26 163 21 104 267 07.00 20 31 19:00 22 15 07.15 25 44 19:15 17 15 07.30 35 50 19.30 21 11 07.45 21 101 45 170 271 19:45 24 84 10 51 135 08;00 Z1 52 20:00 Z4 15 08:15 19 48 20:15 13 6 08:30 15 27 20:30 13 15 08:45 19 74 27 154 226 20.45 16 68 4 4Z 110 09:00 15 25 21:00 11 6 09:15 18 35 21:15 i7 8 09:30 20 32 21:30 12 17 09:45 20 73 29 121 194 21:45 16 56 9 40 96 10.00 21 31 22:00 6 8 10:15 31 23 22:15 6 10 10:30 23 24 22:30 13 4 10 45 21 96 29 iD7 203 22.45 5 32 5 27 59 11:00 28 23 23:00 8 3 11:15 30 28 23:15 3 2 11:30 20 19 23:30 1 1 11.45 28 106 26 96 202 23:45 3 15 2 8 23 Total Vol. 549 608 1357 1317 935 2252 Daily Totals NB SB EB WB Combined 1866 1743 3609 AM PM fit'01o •40 5% '59.5% $7:60!0 58.5% 41.5%- 62.4% k~Hour , • 11:45 07.:30 •07:].5 ~ `' ~ ' ' ~ 16:4$ ~ 12:45 ~ ~. 17:00 - 1Jolume ~ 119 ~ 195 .293 " ' ~ - - 237 122 354 lR.H:'F. 0.85 0.94 0:86 ~ 0:83 0.76 ` - ~O~fi C,D,E,F,G 102 • APPENDIX B • LOS Analysis Sheets C, D, E,F,G 103 C Existing Conditions C,D,E,F,G 104 • ~1 ~ J M O O a F U N v d D ~ H 11 11 a .+ o ro 0 v C x N O q V X ro N C W X ~ N 11 £ ~ > W 0 H Q N H .T O w + « « + f r l0 O ID O VI m O m 0 0 m l 0 0 O O I M m LO 01 O 01 « + H« Y r + + {): I N H t p O p 0 0\ p p 0 0 p 1 0 0 O O I O p 0 • O • R) + r « + ro I I I m m l M M r w r r to V« C I ro GI .~ H 0 .-1 ,-I I H .-I rl H I o 0 0 H H H 2 4 r rl + 'J I W ro O I I I + + H M + p H r O 1 y~ 1 i + > + N Y !11 1 U H r 1 H O H O 111 l0 O ID O O ID 1 0 0 O O I l!I + m N p O p 111 r « w' r 0 + [-I I v U N N 1 10 O l0 O T O O O O O I O O 0 0 1 N t p IIl O ~ W .-1 • + H t + al 1 LI C I m m ~ m 01 1 m 1n I • m m r + Iq I O H H H O H rl r1 H N M I O r O O rl H H « « « r r N I 1 N o 1 ~ ~ « . C7 r r « 3 1 p, o I ~ooloolnMOMOOr~ opoo m 100000 r« Z r r I H 1 NONOOtM Moore 1 omoo I o r+v1 o q + « H + I.a I H I H .# H H ~ rl 1 m r I D ~ O + [-. + f I « H N O rl H N O .-1 H I O O O p H p « + ..7 r + - - N N - - r « `J « « .C~ + I r 1 N O tfi O N N O N O O N I O O O O I r N r N O H p« 'j. !.! f f .-. Q! + {Y. 1 N ri 1 N O N O 01 M M O O !+~ 1 O O O O I O p H O [i~ + + O N r « x> + ro I 1 H ~ H H rl rl I m m l m m r r U l: + r ~- \ . 5 1 ro v I .~ H O H H I ri H ~-I .~ I O O O H H H + LI + « ~ V Y :J I I ~ •p o 1 1 I w JJ Ul 4 + a 07 + O I La 1 I I r + (Y) N LI « « Id N W+ {q I U r'1 r I tD o t0 O u1 r O r 0 0 r i o 0 O o l r N O N O N « O Y (~ O .-I + r U" U+ F I O! U N N 1 m 0 m o m N .a o o .-1 I 0 0 0 0 1 H p p o ~ U H+ t a s « «\ H Y 1J I L C N I/l lp ~0 l0 I m l0 1 O O + « O N f « ~ « N 1 O H ~ H H O H H I rl H N M I O 0 0 N H N t + 11 ro l l N o a v+ + H IC I I + + E+ t OH G)+ W 1 W o 1 000 o NI-lo.-loon I op o0 1 I-1+ oN MoM r~ r yr 'O (`. ~+ r> Ul V7 t 1 rl 1 N O N O Ol N N O O N I O 01 0 0 1 O+ rl H O q + [.' r v o .+ « + q + a l ~+ 1 I m r I r ~ ,~ r ro« v, ri O« + ,-~ W f I 1 •~ rl O H rl I N O H H 1 O r O O p H p « H« G tl> r « 10 NOt - - - - + « W 10 + « U Dl + - t N t U 11 v+ .i f6 H+ N I h O N O N l0 O lD O O l0 0 0 0 0 1 H N Ill 111 O 111 H r N+ N ',Y N+ + JJ N N r {)' I M H I M O N O D\ N N O O N 1 O O 0 0 I o M O O U « d+ .] a ro« « .1 v>« ro I ro I 1 m m l . M M + E C1 « + N> O1 t L.I" I v O1 1 H H O N rl N H 'i N I O O O N H N « N+ o--r + uaa t p l I ~ro o 1 f N« u U « + + 0 1 a.l y I t A+ O •[) + ro« f (IJ I ri H N 1D O lD O IJ1 H O .~I O O .-I I O O O O 1 M N 01 m O m N+ V+ VI O) O+>+ .. + H E U M N I 0\ O 01 O to o 0 0 0 O 1 0 0 0 0 1 O M O O U + + N U .C t H« u r~ i la C I H ~ .-~ I m Ic 1 M M s w r rj .i 1.1 + Oj r Q! t LI I W H I H H O N H H H N M I O O O N H N i 0+ 7 Ul + N + a l I W O i ~I £+ r-1 f + O N i m O m O 1f1 N O N O O N I O p O O N N 1!1 p O p + t M+ N+ Ol C U1 r H t O + !0 M r O r 0 Q1 m m 0 0 m l O Ol 0 0 1 O M H O U + 1 + Q ~i ,C ~ O+ .C p r rl H O N N I H O N H I O O O N H N + E+ ~ w O « al+ II - - - - r 7+ O p .I r O r tx r C+ q 11 f O+ } N H ro « w« p. « a ~ MH i 01 O 01 O 1!1 M O M O O M 0 0 0 0 roromm moon 1 0000 I N N p p O p o MH o u M+ r N. 10 > UI i U) + + G' I v y 1 .-/ ri O H H I H rl r/ N I ~ O O O ry H N « 1J « O Ol a+ > r 0 0 OI r 7 1 I L ro O 1 1 I N « f N ..] Q f a + O H r r Q I 1J ~ 1 ~ I H t W« r H « (Q I ti H N I £« v« + F 1 EE uMH 1 m O m 0 V1 N O N O O N 1 pl O O 0 0 1 7 Iooloomr root I,-/0000 1 •o p N N N O N o M.~+ o U N+ .i r r r U U+ > + r ,C I ll C I ~ ~ ~ I Cm m i O p p * roe `-' x+ O« « U I N H I H N O H H f ro ri .-1 .~ H ~ O O O N H N « N r + N+ + N I l a o 1 l 0 1 r al « uI o+ (•j r r O 1 N I or « r 2, 1 M I 0~ 001 o III m O m O O m l£ O p 0 0 1 W r oromm moom I omoo I .i H+ N Vf p o p .y+ MM o U r« H f r Or N r o+.~+, .-. + .7 1 H I H ~H ~ .-~ H 13 m r I N + ~~ + a+ o N+ 4k r U + 1 I H rl O N N 0 H o r1 N I >. O t 0 0 N .~ N + N • - _ y V U -H -ri r LI i m + + + C v .-, 1 I ,~ I w I ro ~ f ` o+~ u; 1 ~ 7 v ~ I-I 1 1 l v w H a •O C > + v d+ C+ r .~ + U >, I C ro « A.1 t pl N U« ~ •• QI I O I v) N H O I C a. '~ •H I O C 1.1 1 b W E O W . Gl U N .C a W 0 .C « W« X + U . YI E + r.. JJ I ~ v 1 £ , .-~ ~, '..~ > •• • 0 I .I W v b I >, > >. U v ~ > ~ +~ Y 7 + M + N« ~- N H+ U C I H N I + W« F b r Id N I O N [J I Ql O H ro n H ro > 1 N C E ~/1 I w > ,[ 1~ a '(~ O L N ro ro I b b L I r1 t.I O U\> d\ !~ £\ N\ q H >. Ill f C>' r m+ Y w W + N+ N E r O E 1 lI L N I E ~ .+ a> v uaa~l I IJr7 W NH 1 u vi C E >. v.p xr la h v+ .~ N ri t H Ql I L ,q d l 0 01 $ L I-I a~ b I ~\ ~ (V b I 1{I \ J.I N 7 Id 7-1 q N f N i I-1 + lJ r U Ifi 1J + a> L' Ol (^i C'. 1 "I N O M N w W ro ro W W ('. I y lJ C C I a H rl N H .-+ d V7 £« L+ [ti + C r >. D a r a 0 I O N ti Itl I O N 41 C N x x 71 N U .7 .# I p N ro b .i I b 0 N N O C1 rn ro O U r O+ +H+ uaor a£ I ua£a I >L+o1cOH~l~w~eex'105' ~n~naaw I u >uc~>caaaa x+ zr ~: • w r M r I w + i I r 1 m O W 0 IA M O !+1 O O Pl I O O 0 0 1 111 N N N O V1 f'1 « r r « Pi I N rl I m O W 0 Ol 01 01 O O OI I 0 0 0 0 1 O a N O ' (~ « « Y « •d I 1 1 m m l r r r Y • w N p U i G I 'p W H N o r-1 1-I 1 ri 1-1 N 1-1 I o 0 o N ri ri Y + « m r a l I v •O o I r r ~ + 1n p r O I w a ~ I + I ~ w N w {q 1 UI-Ir I ~0o~oo1n lno 1nDOU1 I ooDO ~ r Na ror mw I r w 0 w F I G1 U N N 1 M O f~1 0 01 m W O O m l 0 0 0 0 1 ry a lD O U H Y r I Y w L I L (~' 01 T 01 01 O~ 1 m ~0 I 1+1 r+1 + Y r N O H r/ H O N rl I rl rl N f'1 0 D o ry N ry Y I + « M N I N o I « « 1 w r r [{ l a O I O O O O N p O a 0 0 p I O a 0 0 1 p• O 1+1 1.1 O .~1 p Y + In + r + .1 I ror omr root I omoo 1 0 « r+a o q + r o i ~. + r « ~ ,-I 1~ o H .~+ ~ H 0 '. H I o« o o a 1-1 a r r ul I N + « w - - - - . r O > M r w Y M rl rl M « j.1 M I r I N O 10 O N f~l O M O O Al I O O O O I m W r W O m a« « o w« «.. v c>; I N.~ I nforlomp coop I o00o I o a.-I o W « « rl 16 r + 7C > « b I I rl r1 .-I Iy .+ I m m l p a w I I ~ + « `-' \ « C I b N I .d 1-I O r-I rl I fi N N rl I O O O rl rl .i « « z I r •w U r a I I N •O O 1 I r I ` r ~7 I +~ N« a N r O L a I I r I ll L r r ro N QI h (Q I U N r I m 0 m 0 I!1 1D O lp 0 0 l0 I O O 0 0 I m« W m rl O r-1 m r r 1 0 N+ « U "' U+ F I G1 U N N 1 m O m 0 01 111 l/1 O O 111 1 O 0 0 D I nl « p r O U N« i a l a a+ +\ .1 r a.l I L C I N N r1 r1 r+l I m ~o I p p « H I W w r >~ ~« N I O H I H ri N rl O .~1 •-1 ri r1 r1 I ri .-1 ry M I O Y O O N rl N « t F I 0.' w w « 1-1 ro w ro I I N O I I « t I E f + O rl W« W l a O 1 N O N O V1 a O p O 0 a I D p D D l N 1O M lD O 1D N• pl « a.l 1 C a« « > O/vl« ~ I rror~omrl r~DOr~ I omoo I o HH o q r C« U rn 1 0 .-+ « w q « ,a i .a I m r l 10 to r ro r N C I r1 0 M r rl w+ I N N o ri rl I N O r-1 rl I D o o M N M r N r n 0 I w>+ i ro N O w - - - - r w o ~ I ro « urn + u « N L N I 41 y« + .i ro H « I N a O a o 111 Ifl O N o o Ifl I O O O o H N frl M o M 0« p/ « a N a l a l0 Y r 1J 11 y« R. I M r-1 I M O N O Ol N rl 0 0 N 1 O O 0 0 1 O f~l D ' O U « a r b O I a ro« + ,i 07 >+ b I •p I I m W I M n v qx I E0.1« + N> Nr q l I y W Iy .lo Iti r1 I Iti .i 1~'-1 I o ooryl-IN w cp« A O I O~« r Ua.7+ 77 I ~J •d o I I I « I-Ir 7 U ?C I U « + r 0 l i 7 I I I r ro r ro t b« •(Y w r (Q 1 .I rl N I 1-1 O N O 1I1 r O r O O r I O O 0 0 1 !+1 N O Oi O 01 ry r U M 10 b1 Ul I 01 O r> r r F E U M N I .i O rl O T 1-~1 ri O O N 1 O O D O I O 1+1 H O U r « W C a I u A+ .-1 + u « .C i 11 q 1 .-~ H .a r-1 r1 I m ~o I rf r1 « w+ k .1 I rl L« (A M N w U I N H .-1 rl O N 1-1 N N N r'1 I O O O N H N r O+ N JJ£ 1 •r~ N+ 4 W M a l l a O I I + r £ f!! a 1 M£ r ri + « O N 1 rl O N O Vl 0 0 0 0 0 O I O p 0 0 1 N N f~1 N O N r r ll « r1 I v + ri + o • V) M 1 r O r O O1 m W O O m l 001 0 D t N m M o U r d r w k I W W« ~ r r .7 ~ •~+ I '+ ~ H H r1 ~ I m r I ~ to + A« > W I C' r ,C « a r 1 I .~ rl o .1 r1 .a o r1 r1 I o 0 o rv '+ N r E+ O I w O+ w+ II - - - - t a r N t o ~+ o« a - r o+ C~ I wr Or + N roroln lnolnooln I ooDO 1 m Nr 1no1n 10. \ I .~ ro+ wr >. « tX ~ r11~ ~ aoaomin InDO1n I o00o I o mN o u « w« r-1 1 v N«\« -~ r 'O I 'Z) I .-1 rl Iii ri N 1 W m I Ln N « ,C, Y i-i I> v« y i r O I y y rl r1 o N H N N N H I O O O N N N « w r .i Iva•>«oomr al Iyb of I Id r w ,C I ,a p+ a r o rl r r O +~ a I I H N r L1 M M 1-1 w Q1 .1 '-I N I M O M O t!1 RI O M O O r1 I y O O O O I a 1-I • N 111 p O p m • .i « O ~ £r yr r F ~ E ur1 r1 1 momomD oDOO I ,-ID000 I •01-1« r/r~ o u + + w I U r >r « ,~ I >• q r1 ti N N N l am m 1 0 r 1o w + bi z M O« M w 1 U/ N N ri O rl rl I RJ N N rl .d I£ O r O O N ri N + y Y Ul I O r U' + « O I N I r O r 0 u1 tp O ~O 0 0 lD I£ O p 0 0 1 N 1-1 N a !'1 O rl r+ N r N I D. r « z m rorDmm moDm I omoo I ~H mr1 0 V w or O O « 1-/ « + 1.] I rl I H r1 ri 1-i 1-1 I 3 m r I N 1O ~0 r a Y O I N« YL M S O Y - _ U rl N O .-I H _ O '1 O N r1 I S O O O N N N w N r a I ~ O i i. `~' U r I a Ql 1--1 I v N N Y .1r u >,+ a Iv n1n v1-Io I c ,~ ~d~ m.~a'~z>d. a« + w« w N U« W I O •' 'O fA •' E O> 1-1 I 0 C J I N U ro L 4 W 0 .C r Ol « I « ur rn E r .oL ~ v I £Ha n a> o I H a v ro I >, > >.V mr+> £ w+ a« 1 + N+ ... .1 r-1 w U C I .-I N I O .-+ •O n r1 b n> I w ~, E fA I i u O U\> W\ u1 r d r r N+ Fro « ro N I O NU 1 y>•1; ro aT7 0 w Ulbb I ro ro L I rl ro £\ W\qr1 >.m a « r H r N E« O E I N a~ N I E w~ a> U Ua a.-1 1 H.~ v~ Ul r+ I U y C E >, 01A?' « r n1w rlmrl+ tim I w.C d l avsa+tir a s ro l a\aa~rt 1 ro\,.,o~aroNq N+ v« r xr « U N L i a> C 01 C C I ,ti N O N d w w b b W w C l a~ u C C l a'-1 ti N •-1 r-I N Vi £ r a~ « I C+ >, O a+ a 0 1 0 ~+ r1 ro I O ro 4 C w x T W N U 1.7 .1 I ro rob ro ~+ I rt O H N O N N 'O O U r O r H« uao, a£ ~ Ua£a 1 >a~oD EaF x,aa~061 mv~ICaw I v>U~>gaaazr zw W z a H z h a z O U w O ro v N G v u H a O a C N 3 0 q 0 O N .~i 0 m x w ro F • Forecast Existing With Project Conditions • C,D,E,F,G 107 • N M N 0 O y~ h `. y N O F ~+ ll L rl Ub v O 0 U 41 S+ a ,~ o Ol N x ~ o ro ro a v X y G4 £rl ~w 0 C H .1 C7 !-1 \ y ri rl A W O W ro d O a O 41 a M • + M r I ~ O b 0 0 l0 O N m O m 0 0 m 0 0 0 0 I t~l m r 0 0 0 N. + + (X 1 N H 1 W O C rl VI O T If1 171 O O t11 I 0 0 0 0 I O V' O O fA + r + + b 1 m m a v + Y d' m U+ C. I 'O N H H O H ri 1 N H H H 1 O O O N .-I •-I + 4 N + '.3 1 I ~ b O 1 I I M + i V' N + O I yJ p I I « k r N w (A 1 U rl r I H O H O O e-I O 171 lD O 1D 0 0 tD I 0 0 0 0 1 N i m N V' O V' t!1 r r « O F I W U N N I lD O t0 l0 O m O O O O O 1 0 0 0 0 1 N M d' Yl O P7 H+ M . M U I 11 ri I m m m • m m • m 1 W ~O 1 m m « • y I O H I H rl O H .d H •-/ N M 1 O« O O H .i ri + + + Gl I 1 {d O I I Y + + + ',~ I W O 1 lp O l0 O O l0 O N f'1 O !+1 O O M I O C O O I m l!7 O O O O r r + « H I N o N N O m f~l P1 O O M 1 O m O O I O H Vl O q + v+ r « I .~+ rto r'H Ho.-Irl I o ooa.-+c > + r .. + - - - - r .~ + w + + L w + " 17 M 1 r N O 1I1 O O ll1 O Ill N O N O O N I O O O O 1 r N r N O rl C i b r + .-. N + a I N H I N O N N o m M M O O NI I O o 0 o I o d' H O W + f.' r « .k > + b I H H rl N ri H 1 m m t m m S-I + -- \ + C I 2J y 1 H rl O r-I N 1 H N H H 1 O O O H H rl « Ul + U + 7 1 1 N b O I 1 1 r ,~~,+ « aa, + o I ,~ a 1 ~ Nr-+w « ro y N+ c0 1 Ur1r 1 Iooloooloolnror oor 0000 i r NoN oN o+ oa « « u~- uw F I v UNN I mom mo mH .-1 ooH I 0000 I H as o Uri « a + «\ rl + al I U C N N N e ~ m I m to I o 0 Ul U) « >~ >+ y 1 O H N rl O N H H H N M I O O O N ri N + ,7 M + O ri Gl + W I W O 1 0 0 0 O O O O N N O N O O N I O •C 0 0 I N+ O m m O m N r y Gr-1r + p Ncn« I H 1 NoNr+ Inomrl doom 1 omoo I ow ri rf o q + G 0 0+ M q Y ~] I H I I m ' r I •+ ri H + ro .i '.? + + r-1 W+ I H ri O H H H O rl H I O+ O O C rt 'd' r ri W + r ro G1 0 « - - - - + ro N « + U Of « + S+ W l1 r 'l ro •-l + I N 1 N O N r O N 0 lfl d' O C O O W I O O O O I N N W m O m r-1 + Ul ~ ,7 t + JJ N G) . W I f1 r-i I N O N H C O m dl X 0 0 V' 1 0 0 0 0 I O r'1 O O U + a a a.+ + « rl N>« b 1 b I 1 m m 1 Nl rt + E 7+ « N> W+ ^ 1 N W 1 H N O rl rl I N H H H I O O O N H N + y O W+ + Ua«7« C 1 1 alb o 1 I . H U`~« + . O I N C I 1 + ro + 'O + r (T1 I N rl N 1 b O l0 m O VI O ll1 H O ri O O H I O O O O I ni N O m O m N« U U1 b«>+ .-. i F I E U Nl N I 01 O Ol O O 01 •~i ri O O rl I O O O O I O f+1 ri O U w U O + .-1 + U « .C: I 11 Ci I rl rI ~-I rl I m to I m r+l + w N .. i W. v + L I y H rl H O .i H I rl N N rl I O O O N H N f 0 > ..1 + + y . G I I a o. 1 + 4i N+ ri + + O N 1 m o m r o It1 o In 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 o a o o i tD N m r o r C« 1a n~£ • r++ O . cn I M 1 r or H mono 0000 I omoo 1 o rlrl o U + v u] + rl r « .7 1 .a I H .y H 1 m r 1 c w + A y+ .C + C I H N O H H H O H H~ O O O N ri N « 7 W G + L 4 II - - - - O O « O « CY, - - - - « C ~+ O+ f N m O m O O m 0 V1 I+1 O 1+1 O O rl I O O O O I Ill N C' d' O sr f+l + N L+ W+ >• p.' I M N 1 r O r r O m m m O D m l D O O O I O Nl H O U + W > N+ O1 + « ~ 1 I QJ N 1 H H O H H I H H H N' O O o ry H N « yJ v w+ > « oom+ ,~v o l v rl a+ a r 0 N r+ O I L a I 1 r-I . y Q i + H « R7 I N rl N 1 m O m Vl O r1 O N r O h O 0 r I ry 0 0 0 0 1 7 d' N M M O t+1 1'1 « rl « v+ + F I ~ urorl I look romr roor I rlooo0 1 vo rort o u U M O+ « 1.1 I N H I r1 H O H H I b H N N ri I£ O O O N rl N r y .'1; f 41 « 41 1 1 PI O 1 p 1 « L « U' « O N m O m O O m 0 1(1 m O m O O m 1 E O C 0 0 1 y •-/ + N N cM O q' r Y 41 o+ + « 2 nl i ror romm mo0m I omoo I tiH+ rl rl o v + o o+ H « + «] ~ H I ra H H H .-1 H 1 3 m r I y « to ~o + a o r st + U r 1 I H d o H N 1 0 N o rt H 1 >, o. o o N H N . v « G + . to rl « 1 I rl . ' I W i Id . ' « « rl . U >~ M I [ I b N O p N H O I (." U I y .-i a •O I.' > a« p + t/r G7 7)ur I w t o vwr,>w E o> F l o G .~ I w u ro~a v o.a+ v + uw y E . .C +-+ I v I £.~a o >. C9 0 l ,a v v ro t ~. > >,U wr+9 £ i+ 7 + d+ -- .~ .i r U C I~ N I 0 H> W~ 'O n rl •p n> I .u C E UI I yl a.+ O U\ 7 77 \ vl r d y+ F ror ro N 1 O yU' 1 v>A ro N roab Ou Wb•O 1 b roal .a rt£\ W\gri >.m+ + H r y E. O E I H a+ y l E i ~+ b w ti a> O u a a rl I H .a y y .-+ l u y C E >. w A ~G + w N M .-I y .i M N N I L .C Q) 17 y 3 L N y u N a 0 ro l a\ 7 N ro l ro\ L N 7 ro N q N+ Q1 + al + > U, y a.l r a> I C trl C C I ,-I y 0 .+ 'O y .a W W W b b w W C l al a.r C C I a .-1 .1 N r-1 ri N to £+ al « I-Ci+ U.-070+ a£ ~ UrY S.ro7 I j N~ C•6 Wro C yww ~ ~wEW 1 Vro/rna.%7W 1 U>°UU' >°ASa~x« z° + I `~ ~,~, ~,~ 108 I I 2 F u1 z O U W ~a O A U 0 a C .y 3 D q N U N 0 m x w w ro F • N M 0 O H H h a~ F ~ L I ~1 uro O O 0 U FI 41 a ,~ ~ U O 41 v S O 0 X H b roau v a k N ~~a w > to O ~ U L \ N H ~ H k• N w x O w ro v a 0 a O a « « . « I r « M 0.' I N H I mommoloolnNONOON o000 1o Nlnror m O m H O O m H H O O H I O O O O I O C r+ O {q r1 + t w v ~ H ,~+ H H m m r r : w + m1nU+ C b v i H H0 HH i •~,~HH ~ o DoHH.+ Z + + m + O I 1 O b O I I H « « ul a • O I iJ C 1 1 i r > t + N « (Ij I U H r 1 b O tD o 0 b O l!1 Vl O 111 O O Ifl I 0 0 0 0 1 r N C' r O r m+ (Y, M + O « F I Ul U N N l M O 17 M O m m m 0 0 m l D O O O I N '? \0 O U H+ H « + L I y.l (~ I m m m m m • m I m ' 1p 1 M M + « « • N I O H I H H O .-1 H 1 H H N M I O O O ry H N + + + s v l N o f + U' + « t 3 1 C11 O 0 0 0 O O O O N V' O d' O D s} I O~ 0 0 1 W+ O I+1 H O .~ p• ,Z. + + H I ~ r Or r omr r oo r l Om00 1 O a H s} O Q + H .~. + « « a H I m r I a w a F v+ « + I ti Ho I-1H i HoHH 1 oa ooaHa t a •I « Y + - JJ t + ,C + 1 r 1 m O lD O O 1D O N t~1 O M O O I~1 1 0 0 0 O 1 m m r m O m + d' + V1 '7.• b t + Ql 4 a. I N H I t~7 O M M O m dl cM 0 0 d' I O O O O I O CI H O (A t O H+ « \ ? I •d W 1 ~ H H O H H I H H H H I O O O ri H ri f v« t U « I 1 v ro O I i i ` W L w i t a m • O I L '~ I QI N H + t IC N N+ (Q I U H r I D ~( « + U `~" U« F I Ol U N N I m o m o O m o 1!1 lD o 10 0 0 l0 I o 0 o O I m+ m m H O H m O m W O m Ifl 1!1 O O Vl 1 0 0 0 O I M+ ~' r O U m t N+ y~ a « «\ N« LI I L G I N N N ' M M ' M 1 m ' ~D 1 « 7 V' « O C/ Ul + « ~. + W I O H I H H H H H O H H H H H I H H N M 1 O 4 O O N H N J-I a E t + ,-a rC + IQ I I N o 1 I 1 a Y + O H v+ [.j I pl O 1 N O N m 0 0 0 1f1 1+1 O M O O M I O W O O I M 1D O N o N M• N ro C .-1 + +> QI UJ t I rl I M O M N N O m l/) lf1 O O Vl I O m 0 0 1 O H N O Q • (y' N O O« + q + a l H 1 I m r l r' r t rt m .I>+ + .-~ w« I 1 H Ho H,~ I Ho•-~.-I I o D o mHm + H C w + + r6 d0 « - - - - « v ro v « + urn « w u L N+ + .i Id N« I N V' O ~' 1l1 O m O 1!1 H O •-1 O O H I O O O O 1 N N 1f1 ~0 O ~p H+ Q! H C 7+ L N v+ {y' I MH I H Orl•-1 N D OEM M o Ort I o 00 O I O MO o U + a a a ~+ .I v>« ro I ro I I m ' m l M M E ^U + + N> N« C. I v W 1 H H O H H I H H H H I O O O N rl N • N 0 W+ + Urja+ C I 1 ;.1ro D I I I + N U U v + ro+ « (G I N H N 1 H O H W O m O !fl U1 O ll'1 O O N I O O D O I M N H O O O N+ U N W ro t >+ ~. t [-~ I E U M N I H O H H O m N N O O N I O O O O I O M H O U + U 0 r ~+ U « ,G 1 N C I H H H H H H I m ~ I a .r « w Q H .G a W« N r L I~ H I N H O H H I H H N M I O O O N H N + O > u« « to + a I I p, o I I I + rn t+ O/ + rl « « O I N I .i O r-1 N O lU O V1 lD O l0 O O l0 I O aN O O I N N lD 1l1 O 1!1 m + N G v£+.-I« o 1n I M I rorH momm moon I omoo I H MM o U « v ~ N + r+ a I H I .i H H H .-1 H 1 m r I ~ 10 « p ~ m t ,C+ a + I H H o •~H .-' oH,-1 I o 0 oN HN 6 3 w C r u + II • - - - - + a O O 0+ O+ p' « C Q rl + O« + • N r O r O O r 0 1f1 UI O l/l O O U1 I O O O O I m N r 1!1 O 1f1 lD V N 11 « W• ~+ « p,' I M H I y f{1 +\+ ~ « b I ro C O d' V' O m ll1 Ifl O O V) I 0 0 0 0 1 O M N O U H H H H N H I m m I N N « W + .C lD O > Sr + W+ + C N W H H O H H I H H H H I O o o N H N + w O Ul Ol «>« 0 0 m a ~ 1 I L •O O I 1 N N a s+ q+ o H r+ o w 7 I r+ rn d t + H + p] I rl r-i N + v+ « F 1 E uM.~ ~ M O M m O N 01!1 M O M O O 1+1 I aJ O O O 0 1 7 N a N r 1p O l0 mom oom•-I ,-loo.l I ,-~oooo I •0 '~+ MM o U m t .1 « u ~ a ~+ + .G I N C N H N N N N I a m m I O • ~ ~ + ro U+ O r « 1J I v H I H H O H H I TTl H H H H I ~,' O+ O O N N N « y x+ ~-I i + ~1 I I RI O 1 1 O 1 + L Ifl + C7+ + o N I rorooroln~oo~coo~ I £D~'oo 1 WH Ncr1oM r+ N .-+ o« + « 2 i M I ror r O m m m o o m I omoo I ri H M M o u + O r o t H+ -, + a 1 H 1 H H •~+ ,~ H ~-+ 1 3 m r I rn ~ e ~ + a o O+ 3k + U •' + N + + Q1 N a - - N H H O r-1 H I O H O r1 H I >. O O O N H N - r-1 - .-1 + v N + m + C+ WH « I I r+ + O r~~ u+ I l a I W I N N ti w rl I I N d « v r + .i « U >. • I C ~ •p n N O C v rl O I C w I~ N r-I a 'O .C > d• 7 + a~ r N Ol U+ 1 y 1 O + U« N E + .C it I W I£ b [A .-1 > W E O> H I O C w I N U IC .C r1 v O H rt O >~ C> O I '1 N N b I >. > >, U v H>£ ~+ U7 +~ + 7 X N « v+ ~- N rl « U C I ,-1 fr I 0 rl > IO ~ ro H •O > I w C E 1n I L a.l O U\> v\ 1n r d w « m+ F b+ b y I O vl U' I N >.C b N b IQb Oar Nbb I ro ro w I .~ rt £\ v\QH >. m+ w + N+ y E« O E I N 11 m I E +-+ ~ro v .+ Q> u uaa•-+ I Nam rn rl I O rn C E >. wA .~[ « b v« rl m .+ + H N I L .C v I C + L+ U N L « a> C b1G C I .-I v 3 ++ v m a~ w 7 7 v l~\ 0 v ro l 16 \ u v 7 b N Q N O r1b UJ .+ v wwrobww L" 1 LI L f.' C. 1 art 'I drlH O) [A N+ v £ • +1 H F G+ ~. O a t a 0 I O N rl M1i O b N C 'O 10 C N 5S N N U a .'1 I ro ro ro N N I N O N 3.1 O W N b O V+ O « H+ U a d« c[ £ I U d' £ a I > ~1[hH p(IC}H/9 a C~ O~' a£ W I [7 N Q a W I U> U (~ >^ •7 Q .a x« ,7. • • • APPENDIX C Central School District Letter C,D,E,F,G 110 A d Q I CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT 10601 Church Street, Sulte 112, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909)989-8541 Fax (909)941-1732 BOARD OF TRUSTEES , Steven L. Godwin November 29, 2006 j Hugh M. Jackson ; Barbara M. Rich Kathy A Thompson Pau] Martin ' Joan R. Weiss RBF CONSULTING 14725 Alton Parkway Irvine, CA 92618 ADMINISTRATORS ~ Sharon L. Nagel Dear Paul; , Superintendent Robert A. Dalton, Ed D. I am writing to document the Central School District (CSD) forecast ~ Assistani Superintendent, number of elementary aged children generated by the proposed ~ ~ Business Services Foothill/Grove Mixed-Use project located at the northeast corner of the ~ Curtis R. Frick Foothill Boulevard/Grove Avenue intersection in the City of Rancho I Assistant Supenntendent, Cucamonga. ~ Human Resources and Satety Preparedness ~ Donna L. Ltbuttl Based on our review of the project description and anticipated pricing of Assistant Superintendent, the proposed residential units, we anticipate approximately 17 total Student Achievement and children (grades K through 8) to be generated by the proposed project. C Educational Services While this projection is low by historical standards, the recent experience ~ } of the district has been that few elementary aged children are generated by i new housing in the $500,000 plus price range. i Please contact me with any questions. `s Smcerel f d"~ ~ , v ~ ~ Robert A. Dalton, Ed D. ~ Assistant Superintendent, Business Services { r RAD:dr f C, D,E,F,G 111 , EXHIBIT V • • Exuie~r V IS PROVIDED UNDER SEPARATE COVER C,D,E,F,G 112 • • • ~~. ' __ ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM (Part I -Initial Study) Ciry of Rancho Cucamonga (Please type or pnnf clearly using ink. Use the tab key to move from one line to the next line.) Planning Division (909) 477-2750 The purpose of this form is to inform the City of the basic components of the proposed project so that the City may review the project pursuant to City Policies, Ordinances, and Guidelines; the California Environmental Quality Act; and the City's Rules and Procedures to Implement CEQA. It is important that the information requested in this application be provided in full. INCOMPLETE APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE PROCESSED Please note that it is the responsibility of the applicant to ensure that the appl~cat~on rs complete,at the time of submittal, City staff w~l/ not be avail~~ble to perform work required to provide missing information Application Number for the project to which this form perfains Project Title Foothill & Grove Name & Address of project owner(s) San Antonio Community Hospital 999 San Bernardino Road, Upland, CA 91786 Name & Address of developer or project sponsor Peter Bachmann, Kamm Realty, Inc 16661 Ventura Blvd Suite 712 Encino, CA 91436 Contact Person & Address Gtwck Buqu - ,; c2 S,,.L ,l`4 "~.ri7 -{~' z r 3 c:~ y~ pv-,Z ~' !u b ~- ~ ~ ~(o~-C.• / G !~ 7 ~ c !zc_----c~ ~, /.j! i /~/~G~ Name & Address of person prepanng this form (if different from above) ~r/,s~( c"F~e~.r--a - ell , Telephone Number 909-481-1822 City of Rancho ca n itial Study doc Page 1 of 9 Created on 3/14/2006 1 28 PM Ex~«,T C,D,E,F,G 113 10) Describe the known cultural and/or historical aspects of the site Crte ail sources of information (books, published reports and oral history) There are no known hlstorlcal aspects of this site 11) Describe any Horse sources and them levels that now affect the site (airoraft, roadway Horse, etc) and how they will affect proposed uses exlsting road way noise which and should have no major Impact on use 12) Describe the proposed project rn detail Thrs should provide an adequate descnpt~on of the site in temts of ultimate use that will result from the proposed project Indicate rf there are prooosed phases for development, the extent of development to occur with each phase, and the anticipated completion of each increment Attach additional sheet(s) rf necessary GPA flung only • City of Rancho Cucamong Initial Study doc Page 3 of 9 Created on 3/14/2006 1 28 PM C,D,E,F,G 114 13) Descnbe the surrounding properties, including information on plants snd animals and any cultural, histoncal, or scenic aspects Indicate the type of land use (residential, commercrai, etc ), intensity of land use (one-family, apartment houses, shops, department stores, etc) and scale of development (height, frontage, setback, rear yard, etc ) West -Existing Residential North -Red HIII Countv Club East -Existing older shopping center South -Foothill Blvd 14) mil/ the proposed project change the pattern, scale or character of the surrounding general area of the protect2 No See justification statement 15) Indicate the type of short-term and long-term noise to be generated, including source and amount How wdl these Horse levels affect adjacent properties and on-site uses What methods of soundproofing are proposed Land use amendment only "16) Indicate proposed removals and/or replacements of mature or scenic frees None 17) Indicate any bodies of water (~ncludrng domestic water supplies) into which the site drains None • City of Rancho Cucamong initial Study doc Page 4 of 9 Created on 3/14/2006 1 28 PM C, D, E,F,G 115 18) lndreate expected amount of water usage (See Attachment A for usage estimates) For further clanfrcat~on, please contact the Cucamonga County Water Drstnct at 987-2591 a Residential (gal/day) 0 00 Peak use (gal/Day) b Commercial/Ind (gal/day/ac) 0 00 Peak use (gal/min/ac) 19) Indicate proposed method of sewage disposal. ^ Septic Tank ^ Sewer If septic tanks are proposed, attach perco/at~on tests If discharge to a sanitary sewage system rs proposed lndreate expected daily sewage generation (See Attachment A for usage estimates) For further c/anficat~on, please contact the Cucamonga County Water Drstnct at 987-2591 a Residential (gal/day) 0 00 b Commercial/Industrial (gal/day/ac) RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS: 20) Number of resrdent~a/ units Detached (rnd~cate range of parcel saes, mrnrnrum lot srze and maximum lot srze Land Use Amendment On Attached (rnd~cate whether units are rental or for sale units) TBD. Land Use Amendment On 21) Ant~crpated range of sale prices and/or rents Sale Price(s) $ to $ Rent (per month) $ to $ 22) Specify number of bedrooms by unit type 23) lndreate ant~crpated household srze by unit type • City of Rancho Cucamong Initial Study doc Page 5 of 9 Created on 3/14/2006 1 28 PM C,D,E,F,G 116 24) Indicate the expected number of school children who will be residing w~thrn the project Contact the appropriate School Districts as shown in Attachment B • a Elementary b Junior Hrgh a Senior Hrgh COMMERCIAL, INDUSTRIAL AND INSTITUTIONAL PROJECTS 25) Describe type of use(s) and mayor function(s) of commercial, rndustnal or institutional uses Land Use Amendment Only 26) Total floor area of commercial, rndustnal, or rnstitut~onal uses by type N/A 27) Indicate hours of operation N/A • 28) Number of employees 7`ota/ 0 Maximum Shift 0 • Time of Maximum Shift 29) Provide breakdown of anticipated fob classrficat~ons, including wage and salary ranges, as well as an rndicat~on of the rate of hire for each classification (attach additional sheet rf necessary) N/A 30) Estimation of the number of workers to be hired that currently reside in the City N/A *31) For commercial and rndustnal uses only, indicate the source, type and amount of air pollution emissions (Data should be verified through the South Coast Arr Quality Management District, at (818) 572-6283) City of Rancho Cucamong Initial Study doc Page 6 of 9 Created on 3/14/2006 1 28 PM C,D,E,F,G 117 ALL PROJECTS 32) Have the water, sewer, fire, and flood control agencies serving the pro~ecf been contacted to detennrne their abrl~ty to provrde adequate service to the proposed pro~ect~ If so, please indicate fheir response All agencies contacted have indicated their ability to provrde services to the protect 33) In the known history of this property, has there been any use, storage, or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic matenals Examples of hazardous and/or toxic matenals include, but are not limited to PCB's, radioactive substances, pesticides and herbicides, fuels, oils, solvents, and other flammable l~qurds and gases Also note underground storage of any of the above Please list the matenals and descnbe their use, storage, and/or discharge on the property, as well as the dates of use, if known None Land Use Amendment Only 34) Will the proposed project involve the temporary orlong-term use, storage or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic matenals, including but not l~mrted to those examples listed above ~ If yes, provide an inventory of all such matenals to be used and proposed method of disposal The location of such uses, along with the storage and shipment areas, shall be shown and~fabeled on the application plans None Land Use Amendment Only I hereby certify that the statements fumrshed above and rn the attached exh~brts present the data and rnformaf~on required for adequate evaluation of this pro/ect to the best of my ability, that the facts, statenu~nts, and information presented are true and correct tot he best of my knowledge and belief /further understand that additional information maybe required to be submitted before an adequate evaluation can be made by the Crty of Rancho Cucamonga Date 3/15/06 Signature ~~ Title Chuck Buquet, Charles Joseph Associates C • • City of Rancho Cucamong Initial Study doc Page 7 of 9 Created on 3/14/2006 1 28 PM C,D,E,F,G 118 TopoZone - Village Grove Shopping Center, USGS ONTARIO (CA) Topo Map Page 1 of 1 ,-' _.= ~'~xlpG~ZZGl1~ 1~ ~`~__; - _ • 1~' ~ II S ~" r . r . -- ._ ~` i ~ ~ :'~~al ~~7ix4~; lI^_ . ~ ~„ ~'~ E t~al~l~.',ii' ~II'I lj~vn w,~ ...~ -,~-^ - r - '- 1, .l~ qtly t`.*,l `1~"'J~"' +r~~33 1 sl a, ~- R ~; ., ~, '` it - - - » ;~rel1,5 4 r ~~„ ~~•~~b~z y` ~~;1';~`~`lEa'lw~.;~ctrirf', .. ,~ • ,..--'^• ! _ 4. •Y. • I;. ~1 ; ~ 1 .7'.r'+ ~~ I d }s' r ~,1,y~t~ ~ ~~ ~-.r aC-"i„ _ ' - `,` rl `r _ _ ~~. .~ ~~Yi+.l- ~~ 5;..._ _J'~ ~!J~4 ~~t1r''11 -~i ~=, t.tr+i"ti[rn -1 _.- .~ ~ ~~,~~=+~~'~ 'Ik .o~ _~ ~ ~T~~u .#~.. 1 ~. ~,, ~ a~ +a~''2 ; 4~~ "" -t-~ 1 X11:5 ~' _ 'l~Ell' '~ '_~ - PPrCnlrStltfn S„l'x, ---- -...~_ _ ° ~• ' ,. ~ tlw~~.a• `~~ ;'~~.,>. °~°-+'~ ~,. , J~a _ °.a",y, ,~'• I '=- -- - ~'-~nl;K°'` ,.~a~~-_~.-~t '''~.,.~~~`"n ff^ik~~~ * ~ ~! i t„• E .' r _ •t.4-'-- -.~-- --'k. ~ .._. - _ - - -fix ~~,;;~r~~~a~ 'W,_` _j ~~:~ r •;,~ ~ t' 5 ~7'l1~'"' ~u- ~ ~.?J •r:~.1'',i, „ l _ vI iya+', "" r,~".J eY' r 'ifI ~ ~ -t~ •J ,''t,',}~xfi ~j'ry. ~s' ~ ~ l! f "+r,...~~'`" =,Sl~r - ! 1 -}•~n~~ ="~'~,r., bra ('.r~'Y~y.~~n ~ ,~ q : 5: ~S i~~`• _ ~Yt ~,~ 1'• Y'~' ! Ti ~fj~~r;~"` • ~ ;-~'A~,3~. 1 S ~ ~ ~,T ~_ w, $W 7 5 , ~"~Y' % "~~ k~'~'- -".~%' +• ' f ~ ~ t.4 F, i~' ~ 'sue ~ ~ s _r., I '~_t y , fi"..~L-~^~s. , ~ ~,t-.T , `~ d'~J~ • r""'~ 4'~'-: ;~u'~ ?%Y_~„!a ~~TM I ~ r - I r~^.t , l p, ~ l~'~ri•,;; -s~~.,z,-: , -' ;.~--~,~`"'_"T"rr ` w ~s~r~ r ~r 6. - -... i- Irk '~~ab-,. {{,~krr! ~r.,,.,. '-~y.~~'~,,,, ~~~,s.~~..,,";;~ /-" ^ ~t N 1' •~ " tl'" 3 '',~,' y ai 4 " A ' _ '~ d :f~.. 'u~~''`{.'1~,..t ~ ,` ash rYv( `jT`-"' f ' y~+" ./,1 -- '!~'..._.~. .I' l,a'•',~ T f` ,1 - -r`:_ ~~ ~ _r~ 4~~ :~ ~~`,~ 1 `,e _,y' .~!` ~ ~~tAi~La~~ •,...J~. ~ r " •~•ly x • ~,.~ -.. --:tia 1. ~ fY~ ~ tr, Mr.a....u: ~ f tr-'.'.~ ~~*' '- t,~r „o-Ss~, nr;, ,:- y^'v=a ,;2•, s ~'n~ 1,'~r-.' ~~ ,,,. _.. ~ " ° •' ' ~ ` ! ~ `ice.-.~• - '=~I ~~~ <'~ 1 ..~i ,'1~-~~^,'szt4wxlj~'}':~ ;~,'~r~~,g~l~{la"~,, _ ~`7~r ~ ar ~~~pK' 4i¢itt ~4:'v;:~ ~ '_ ~. -'? _ .~ . A ~2* W -'Sa .{e' + 7 ~f R ~ ~ ~ ~i Cf~~rr n.. ~•~n^'~: I=_.I. ~i>IN'n• fil - ~f~*,1°~~~14 x'R ~r s +~ri-'_ ~x~ ~'.',~'M.4~' LY r , i F' s 'lsc;,.~ 1~;`-`„N ~`4. 'a ~; ~ ` ~y rH. ,`~~ ~^ M~,';4: ~-' fir, hk~,7 `~'~' ",~~ ` », ~' ~ t ~ ~'~+ :~~1 ~~. 4YYt ,I t~ ~ i r ` ,~~~y, ;s ~ ~r ' ..-._'-._•J ~ w ` .S ~ gSt •`~ T, t ~, m!ta~( ~ ~ti ~ `#,i a ~ i ~4 ! ` y ,,;~1 .~~u4 "~;~ y ~><~ r '~ • l t `yiry' I (..._., i3 t"..,Ln',ri~i~ri~t„^'~" ~,. ~~~H ~~ ~ ~', ,tr~; n \ =4°-~5~ ~15'-!St/y,i, s Y,~r,[~1~~., ~/,~er t -. _:~it.. -i l h~y~ _- - ,ly. r~ ~.:~„~~ , `~a07~'J~i~~-L'rpt r~ .N ~ +~~, y' ~k 1~9 .; sti ~ `'I""'^`r"r~ '~~ I*~, ,+"`- ,mar :~:t ....~.G1r4;~ _ tE '~ ~ '~ ~ ~~fi.~"'ti', .. ~a= s Lf - ~ m,~,7, ~-'~S~,If e~`,&~ Ins~~ r ~,~ r1~ ,~t~'"-~ •,~fai'~i'~ ~ rt'G ~";fNx ~.~:~. ~ x_'17 '=,: •hvathiEl Ti~rotEa~+ ~ t~', ~~ _;:~~+" _ ~,~~~` F ~ ~ ~; ";r!.- K , ~ i ~~`.,r~,`~ ~.) W °4i~ ~ r _.. f -__ _ _ ;_,{; __ s ry et~ yaSf, ~"•..+ J'~ ~.uel~a.{~~,j/}+(~ ~` .~.---i,+ 1 i 1 - dye`" ~ ~ „ ~ ~,'~ ~ ~ q`'-~ 'EU ~. ~ ~ ~ _~ _~it` '~ 1 P~ ~ ~S ' ~ , _"'!i ~ - IYIv ki ~ ~ a t i ~ ~ i ~.rl••~9,.ia[ 1' '~ > r~~" - _ 1 F I~~ r ~ -'' '.'~.i"i.,~ ~~ ;'~`~ ~ ~''71a~ ~', -- _ j~ • • 1 .I~,:A.r~:',_ _'s,--^Cs~~''- T- - '. 'I u ~ I,J~t+.a tq~ 1 - ~ r I~, ~ r 1 ~, L1 r If ! e~t~ _. ~.~ ' ,, .,l i ~,«~-,-- ~. ,h' .~ 7*:,~ ..ch '~ ~_ ~ ~r~!' ~. {'><~Ifc`1 ICY,E,~a" f~ - ~ 17e"~II ru.. ~ '~ - i~ ~ ~ t ~ l ek `^a t .~ -,~..,' w'~. t"~ ~ ••;~ r' l 1 ('~]IaP; -Y ~ •-f , .• al:~- 4., •. ( _ _ '' ~ ~! ~"Y '''1~~~'~ ',_' _~3`~-_`* ~, a. - YAl lp>- ~i?rTi~" tw _~ ~~~'r~ - - ~~' .~~.:_."r`.- ~ ~ ~~ ,~ .~_-"-7 ~~c ~ia`~"'^~' ~'~ ` -. _ ~; ~t ~;.'G.~-~?art,, `~y -~ ,R ~, o~~;~~~ .~,.,~~ „ -~ r "Ij' ~ T ~ ~--~Ne{'.w"{~~'y~ ~ ~ ~~. *lC'~ .L E ~ w ~+~ , ~.~,, , -~ . $'' ~ a ~~ (~, ~' I ~ ~ ~ : ~ti t><' ~ : ~ r 81 rt. J rr+~i' t_# ~ _,~„ ~ } _ ~w~ I tGf ~' 'jar,-~ri~C, 1>:r^'n.l i ~~ -4" ,~ '7, _ '~~r~ ~~k~'~'~r`~ (jUypr+;,31=,a~ ~°~ : +`-~x;~r'4;-I.. ~ .1_ ~~,~r~~a-. rYs. ~~S~~~rk,~,~,c__<-~~~ S '~--- ,r, I r l t :~ . -~.. , ,-. 2~'h. 4~~ "~'--,~ ~m ~~~ I 3+, ~ ~ ,~ ~ - ..+'~ j ~ ~: - ~: =hl~~~ Nis l~ - . ~., ~ i . h - _ 'P,,'' a ~ '"^~"'~~ 13 _ ._. ~: F' ~ __~ -~ _ f'""r~ ~ _~~'~a~~'°ba,+ ~ ~, sr'd ~t~ i a I ~!~ .`~ ~ `~ S~ ~1 _ -~~~a?~~ ... a.~ L>_~s;: h»;~^ ~~, _ ~~;, ':~~„~~,r ~ ~'~ • +• F'p9"r.,, s T _ N ~~,'~ ' r, ~t`. rMk•~s.~ ~ ~ •. .•. y p l - . k~., 1~ - a I a _"~~ ~-'.rii%_ ~- 'f i :r Y -r -~r ~II r i ~_S}rsn. r~t~i : ~1~~r~'-^~Fy i! 77.~O~T[• :~• • • ... ntva • • • -_';=~`µ~~w- '"~°~E-~ F~ 1 ' } - ~ Iet,~r•~.:-'~,",'9~~~d"~,t~"-° M,..::•`~~' ;~a„rr'~7`H~~ ~ 1~• - ~ ~~~~ -_;. {.. ~~ 1I =.,..' ,~. .- ~ ~~w ,u+;~ `;~~~Ir~wak'''~~"`:;yw; it •la , ~,, ^' .-^ - .~,~ ' i"S "1 1~~ „";y,- ti" 'FS, i- - ;<'~~;,` ~ 'r~F y°s <~ '4 ... _ r ~ ~t~'- '„ ,"y`I . r-u ' ~. ",'kli_' ,~~~-+ '~; ;~ ~'~~ ~_"~ r `~_--~,,,-Il+.x.~`._.t~...'~ ~'' _ _ _"A ^ SITK • `° ~ ~ ``-- - ... ,-L'°,.';° ,: YI~~-,~• ~~,''~'~.~~,',~n:NS, _~ !yr"~'v~;_'`tl~ ~r!! ~~7-- ^"t,=~ I• Rd':!1*'3~VJ'lpr5 ~; .~... ,,; : ~r 1, ~ ~,_~,`` . 5C~„~~....-~ ~x' 11.E _: w ,-' l ' a __f j~q'".. ~f •:.~4~85 '• ~~~-_'Ytc ~~r,(, ``''..I~~ `~ 1 ' ~ Y,. ~~' ~ ~yq' '.r•'~ - ~", '%.Fi1I~1~~1~ , s --".y ~°:~ ,?~} K --"~ i= ~.-' ~+F Y,l'- I°~!`~J~ _- rr. , , _. .. Il„~.r.-:'~,1t+~.~f"!~' y% ~' ~ ~`~~77..,, //~~ ^h ""'=~_,I+ I '~') T`' „„11~~ 13i I ~ I-'~'• ~'.,8'~~k~ IP v`; ' - l.`.~.. .w~i ,~,•dY' ~~ ,t r r j~~? _ - s_~I ~_,~ _ -~~i ! X.- J.,.~~. ~"~ _ ~!~"':~"r ~r~~rs,~. == rri'~'~~ -.~~~3eoPntk~$I:LY~~r"lf~Pt~E iu~t ~( "'t-rte" ~ _ .a :,i ~~~ ~ '~iit'~;,.'.; '`-. ~~ ~hfy,?~tll'~ F A r~_~"'+„ e ~ f. li ~~ _ I'--`~ -- ''` f~i~ _ t_-~F~f~~Jlli !!(ran 1- +='-D'~;~~..~;'~~,llr•'-II R`".-•; I°~~r ~:'~'"~aiL"'_.. ~. A ( _-~---J -U R!i;iti' ~ .C''„=~ '~;~;5"d` ~'I `"~~."J~...y~r,i~.__J rj'i'Ij '``'~, i"F~~~':-tr^"I=-='-+ _. ~•I (~,-" ~~ 0 0.3 0.6 0.9 1.2 1.5 km ~ 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 4.8 1 mi UTM 11 442137E 3774005N (NAD27) Village Grove Shopping Center, USGS ONTARIO (CA) Quadrangle fv1=13.44 Projection Is UTM Zone 11 NAD83 Datum G=-0.35? C,D E,F,G 119 http://www.topozone.com/print asp?lat=~4 107028c1on=-117.62735&size=l&u=4&layer=... 5/30/2007 0 ~1 a ~, a~ a U .~ b cd .--i a~ ~ a ~ o ~x ~~ o~ ~o ~U U .2 o o ~ Q o ~ i~ ~ ~ ~, sue. 0 ~~ ~ ~ ~ '~ ~' ~ ~ °' o U C7 ~ C ~ b •-•~ ~ ~a L}^~~V" O •11 w~ w o a~ ~ G O ~ U M .~..~ ~ N L ~1 w,~ W i~ w \~y ~~ W 3 a~ ~ U +~ ai ~ O ~ .-, v, A ~ TJ ~ ~ .'. 'LS ~C C O cd a ~ U .,~_, > ~ ~ ~ ~ .C ~~ C,D,E,F,G 120 • • • C, D, E,F,G 121 -° View across Site to the North from Red Hill Country Club Drive View of Site along Red Hill Country Club Drive and Foothill (at far left side) • • C,D,E,F,G 122 View Southerly along Grove side of Site View Northerly along Grove side of Site • View of Rear of Site (from Grove looking East -Upland single farruly homes behind trees on the left) • • C,D,E,F,G 123 View of Eastern property line adjacent to Red Hill Country Club Adjacent Uses C, D, E,F,G 124 • • View of Site from Red Hill Country Club (Eastern boundary of Site) View from Country Club to Northeast corner property line of Site • C,D,E,F,G 125 View to the Northern property line and one of the 4 single family homes in Upland Retail Center at Northwest corner of Foothill & Grove (City of Upland) • t~ • .U S' ~.'+IRVRFLC: ..~ }. -„ ,7,~ t r. 7r , i ~`•~ , b • / ~r,~ ~ ~~,°~J i i RY~1~'~~4°:*Iti, wjlq i~l'i~~ \y w~w.,.~'wt~~ ,~'y`~'*^ti., ~ ~ ,'dt1'A, .. '~,~ ~,~:~,vg~?, 3%~1 ;r,,.~ t . ~cr _ ~ r ., ~{i.,,~,:,'^a~Fw~+';,~-; -,.. ~. yyL.. ..'~'.x~ ~k~ i,~ ~'„~.~,r~ .°r: _ „-;r,;.~`'"':w=_.,,,"""m,°,,, _ ~ - - - -n~,_ ,c,~ ''iti,rt;,;'?"r ^'~°~~'r~~b ~,~,i~,ur'~'r a`tcxr° 4~°(~~~• _;, rr`a,4"~Wym,y n_w, ~~~„ M1 _y ~ .r ~r. ~ ~ ,nay ;r., ,.9 yt V •`'- r i ~ 4 - LL Ty~.,.~ rcn{• %yrJF ~, ~'~ ~~T'ttn,e••'MV ~,~• ;7,r J~ ~TF x%~ '"IS i {A ~k V~ ~ • - `r? ~^ "lr..- , s u x I i,~3e~ .• ~~ .I.q.nY •m,. _ l „ J ' ~1y ~ . i q ., f~~.,'f 4~',:M' ,', ~ J1'b t~,'y L~, S ~. __ '~i,~, ,..T.•__ z=,a~:?3_r,-.y~;Y ~.,..= u~r;{ ~,~tLi..~.tr ~{a,~e~~"Lh~dB~'a-o'?'i';. d~" ~j„~j ~""~'i'~~;,'~ii~,r `'}~i.. , ~ i^ r= ~~ ~ ~' r- ~ ~~y°^~4i.''..:~I~- -,..p,q•~~i 7; ,-~7'...~~ ' .. ..d`~kj .i ~',_9~ Y+''i{ F H !fir ~"'~ . _ v '„ ~1~ tr_~~ris~'r4 AI `y "! 4 '"j :`~' ~'/, w.r-----fw ;.~ ~~kler~,, ' 'ah ~.'. ~ :.~`.. ~}~+` ~ 'H."r;ii I~ l~l ~+` ,.~rj~ ' ~:. ,,(' , ~` r ;.~r •~ad `~I~'=' ~ t ~~ ~ - ~ ~t"' ~ _ _ ~ ~r ~ s. ' ~ . ~ . ~ ~~~ 7°;' =s';,. _r_"'l~ ~ °ttY'~ $ L~~` * ,~~;r ~ ~ .;,,t•,• ., ` ]-. ` F_ - _ _ (9' - rL. ~ ~, _ ~ to •~5.~`'}°r, ~~~~~;~: ;-~' i. ri .~ r : ' . ~ -'`~~., ; `., _ ~ . _ _ ~ - ~ ' 1,^~,~, 'S`, ' lit, ~.. ~,, -4,~~ .7tr ~ ~ ~~ ~~r ! ( ~~?'~~' ~ r. _ ~'r,p~ a ~i." `~N Yt,~'el~ 7 ~r~w^r_^:3 . ~ t~ .:t.J')'." ~r ~~; c ~ " _ .'1-a., ~ - _ '-~ ~ t ' ~ • ° ._ ~"~-,. '~~k~~~G ~ . fir, Gas Station at Foothill & Red Hill Country Club Drive • C, D, E,F,G 126 Picture of retail at Southwest corner of Foothill & Grove looking across Foothill (in Upland) • City of Rancho Cucamonga ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM INITIAL STUDY PART I I BACKGROUND Project Files: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2006-00223 -ARBORS AT ROUTE 66 LLC - A request to change the land use designation for four parcels on Red Hill Country Club Drive from Open Space to Mixed Use to be consistent with the Mixed Use land use designation at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Grove Avenue, to add these same four parcels to Section 2 5 5 4 Western Gateway in the Bear Gulch Area, expand the range of development in the Residential classification to 87% in Table III-7, and to establish a Master Plan Overlay District for the entire 10 1 acre project site on the Land Use Plan m accordance with Section III 2.4 1 of the General Plan -APN 0207-011-35, 36, 41, 43, 44 and 45 Related Files Development District Amendment DRC2006-00350, Development Code Amendment DRC2007-00029, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18179, Development Review DRC2006- 00341 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT DRC2006-00350 -ARBORS AT ROUTE 66 LLC - A request to change the zoning for four parcels on Red Hill Country Club Drive from Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) to Mixed Use to • be consistent with the Mixed Use zoning designation at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Grove Avenue, Establish a Master Plan Overlay District for the entire 10 1 acre protect site on the Development District Map in accordance with Section 17 20 030 of the Development Code, at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Grove Avenue -APN 0207-011-35, 36, 41, 43, 44 and 45 Related Files• General Plan Amendrrient DRC2006-00223, Development Code Amendment DRC2007-00029, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18179, and Development Review DRC2006-00341 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DRC2007-00029 - ARBORS AT ROUTE 66, LLC - A request to change the table for the Bear Gulch Mixed-Use area contained in Development Code Section 17 32 020 C 3 to expand the range of development in the Residential classification to 87% and to include the "Most Case" column found in the General Pian Table III-7 -APN 0207-011-35, 36, 41, 43, 44 and 45 Related Files General Plan Amendment DRC2006 00223, Development District Amendment DRC2006-00350, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18179, and Development Review DRC2006-00341 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18179 -ARBORS AT ROUTE 66 LLC -Condominium subdivision of 10 1 acres into two lots with office condominiums in one office building on Lot 1, and residential condominiums m 7 live/work units, 68 townhomes, and 23 single-family residences on Lot 2 at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Grove Avenue in the Mixed Use Zone of Subarea 1 of the Foothill Boulevard Districts - APN 0207-011-35, 36, 41, 43, 44 and 45 Related Files General Plan Amendment DRC2006-00223, Development District Amendment DRC2006-00350, Development Code Amendment DRC2007-00029, and Development Review DRC2006-00341 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2006-00341 -ARBORS AT ROUTE 66 LLC -Master Plan established under General Plan Amendment DRC2006-00223 and Development District Amendment DRC2006-00350 fora 10 1 acre project site with one 2-story office building, 7 live/work units, 68 town homes, and 23 single-family residences at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Grove Avenue in the Mixed Use Zone of Subarea 1 of the Foothill C,D,E,F,G 127 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2006-00223, DRC2006-00350, DRC2007-00029, SUBTT189179 & DRC2006-00341 Page 2 Boulevard Districts, including expansion of the range of development in the Residential classification to 87% in Table III-7 of the General Plan APN. 0207-011-35, 36, 41, 43, 44, and 45 Related Files General Plan Amendment DRC2006-00223, Development District Amendment DRC2006 00350, Development Code Amendment DRC2007-00029, and Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18179 2 Project Sponsor's Name and Address: Kamm Realty, Inc 16661 Ventura Boulevard, Suite 712 Enano, CA 91436 3 General Plan Designation: Mixed Use Western Gateway in the Bear Gulch Area, Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan, Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) 4 Zoning: Mixed Use Foothill Boulevard Districts Subarea 1, Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) 5 Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: Single-family residential in the City of Upland at the northwest project boundary, commercial retail and office uses in the City of Upland to the west, golf course to the northeast, single-family residential at the southeast boundary, and gas station and other commercial uses to the south. Currently, the site contains a strawberry farm and several farm-related structures and one former residence 6 Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 7. Contact Person and Phone Number: Vance Pomeroy, Contract Planner (909) 477-2750 8 Other agencies whose approval is required (e.g., permits, financing approval, or participation agreement): None GLOSSARY -The following abbreviations are used in this report: CVWD -Cucamonga Valley Water District EIR -Environmental Impact Report FEIR -Final Environmental Impact Report NPDES -National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System NOx -Nitrogen Oxides ROG -Reactive Organic Gases PM,o -Fine Particulate Matter RWQCB -Regional Water Quality Control Board SCAQMD -South Coast Air Quality Management District SW PPP -Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan URBEMIS7G -Urban Emissions Model 7G • • C, D, E,F,G 128 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2006-00223, DRC2006-00350, DRC2007-00029, SUBTT189179 & DRC2006-00341 Page 3 ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact," "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated," or "Less Than-Significant-Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages (/) Aesthetics (/) Agncultural Resources (/) Air Quality ~ (/) Biological Resources (/) Cultural Resources (/) Geology & Soils ()Hazards & Waste Materials (/) Hydrology & Water Quality ()Land Use & Planning ()Mineral Resources (/) Noise ()Population & Housing ()Public Services ()Recreation () Transportation/Traffic ()Utilities & Service Systems ()Mandatory Findings of Significance DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation• () I find that the proposed protect COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared (/) I find that although the proposed protect could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect i ase because revisions in the project have been made by, or agreed to, by the prod ct proponent. A ITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared • Prepared By Date 2~ '2-~"v7 Reviewed By Date 5,2~~67 • C, D,E,F,G 129 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2006-00223, DRC2006-00350, DRC2007-00029, SUBTT189179 & DRC2006-00341 Page 4 Less Than Signrficant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources hP g Potentially Sigrnficant With Mrtgation Than Signficant No Im act Incor orated Impact Impact EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS 1. AESTHETICS. Would the project a) Have a substantial affect a scenic vlsta~ () () () (/) b) Substantially damage scenic resources, Including, but not () () () (/) limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a State Scenic Highway c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or () () (/) ( ) quality of the site and Its surroundings d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare, which () () (/) ( ) would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area Comments: a) There are no significant vistas within or adjacent to the protect site. The site is not within a view corridor according to General Plan Exhibit III-15 • b) The protect site contains no scenic resources and no historic buildings within a State Scenic Highway. There are no State Scenic Highways within the City of Rancho Cucamonga c) The site is located at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Grove Avenue with substantial frontage on the north side of Red Hill Country Club Drive and is characterized by residential and recreational development to the north and to the east, and commercial development to the south and to the west Although the subject site has been used for agricultural purposes since prior to the development of the surrounding residential properties and the project will impose a notably different streetscape, the visual quality of the area will not significantly degrade as a result of the project Design review Is required prior to approval City standards require the developer to underground existing and new utility lines and facilities to minimize unsightly appearance of overhead utility lines and utility enclosures in accordance with Planning Commission Resolution No 87-96, unless exempted by said Resolution d) The protect would increase the number of streetlights and security lighting used in the Immediate vicinity The design and placement of light fixtures will be shown on site plans which require review for consistency with City standards that requires shielding, diffusing, or indirect lighting to avoid glare Lighting will be selected and located to confine the area of illumination to within the project site. The impact is not considered significant 2. AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland () () (/) ( ) of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural uses b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a () () () (/) Williamson Act contract C, D, E,F,G 130 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2006-00223, DRC2006-00350, DRC2007-00029, SUBTT189179 & DRC2006-00341 Page 5 Less Than Sign~ticant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources pP g Potentially Signdicant With Mrtigatwn Than Sgndicant No Im act Incor orated Im act Impaa c) Involve other changes in the existing environment, which, () () (/) ( ) due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural uses Comments: a) The site is not designated as Prime Farmlands, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance by the state Department of Conservation Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program The site is located at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Grove Avenue with substantial frontage on the north side of Red Hill Country Club Drive and is characterized by residential and recreational development to the north and east and commercial development to the south and west There are approximately 1,300 acres of Prime Farmlands, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance within the City of Rancho Cucamonga, of which about one-third is either developed or committed to development according to General Plan Table IV-2 The mayor concentrations of designated farmlands are located in the southern and eastern portions of our City that is characterized by existing and planned development Further, two-thirds of the designated farmlands parcels are small, ranging from 3 acres to 30 acres, and their economic viability is doubtful, therefore, they are not intended to be retained as farmland in the General Plan Land Use Plan. The General Pian FEIR identified the conversion of farmlands to urban uses as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council The proposed project is consistent with the General • Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated b) There is no agriculturally zoned land within the City of Rancho Cucamonga There are no Williamson Act contracts within the City c) The site is located at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Grove Avenue with substantial frontage on the north side of Red Hill Country Club Drive and is characterized by residential and recreational development to the north and to the east and commercial development to the south and to the west The project site is now developed with agricultural uses and structures and has hosted agricultural activities since at least 1927 The nearest other agricultural use is more than 2 miles southeast from the project site Although the site is a proven, viable agricultural property, long-term future compatibility issues limit the utility of this small site for continued agricultural activities Therefore, the impact of the removal of this farmland is less-than-significant • 3. AIR QUALITY. Would the project a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable () () () (/) air quality plan b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially () (/) () ( ) to an existing or protected air quality violation c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any () () () (/) criteria pollutant for which the protect region is non- attainment under an applicable Federal or State ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions that exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant () (/) () ( ) concentrations C, D, E,F,G 131 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2006-00223, DRC2006-00350, DRC2007-00029, SUBTT189179 & DRC2006-00341 Page 6 Less Than Signrficant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources pp g Potentially Significant With Mrtigahon Than Significant No Im act Incor orated Im act Im act e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number () () () (/) of people Comments: a) As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 6), continued development will contribute to the pollutant levels in the Rancho Cucamonga area, which already exceed Federal and State standards The General Plan FEIR Identified the citywide increase in emissions as a significant unavoidable adverse Impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated • b) During the construction phases of development, on-site stationary sources, heavy-duty construction vehicles, construction worker vehicles, and energy use will generate emissions In addition, fugitive dust would also be generated during grading and construction activities While most of the dust would settle on or near the protect site, smaller particles would remain in the atmosphere, increasing particle levels within the surrounding area Construction Is an on-going industry in the Rancho Cucamonga area Construction workers and equipment work and operate at one development site until their tasks are complete They then transfer to a different site where the process begins again Therefore, the emissions associated with construction activities are not new to the Rancho Cucamonga area and would not violate an air quality standard or worsen the existing air quality in the region Nevertheless, fugitive dust and equipment emissions are required to be assessed by the South Coast Air Quality • Management District (SCAQMD) on a protect specific basis Therefore, the following mitigation measures shall be implemented to reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels 1) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions. The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications. Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification. 2) Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, the developer shall submit construction plans to the City denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low-emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the project. Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Gluality Management District (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning staff. 3) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCA(~MD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high volume, low-pressure spray. 4) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108. 5) All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 401, 402 and 403. Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions: • • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering. C, D, E,F,G 132 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2006-00223, DRC2006-00350, DRC2007-00029, SUBTT189179 & DRC2006-00341 Page 7 • Less Than Significant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP g Potentially Signdicant With MdigaLOn Than Sgnificant No Im act Incor orated Impact Im ad • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads. • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time. • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods. • Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices. • Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. • Suspend grading operations during high winds (i.e., wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with Rule 403 requirements. • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means. 6) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water duality Control Board [RWQCB]) daily to reduce Fine Particulate Matter (PM~o) emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. 7) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAGIMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM~o emissions. 8) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel-powered equipment where feasible. 9) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. After implementation of the preceding mitigation measures, short-term construction air quality emissions would remain significant as noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 6) Based upon the Urban Emissions Model 7G (URBEMIS7G) model estimates in Table 5 6-4 of the General Plan FEIR, Nitrogen Oxides (Nox), Reactive Organic Gases (ROG), and Fine Particulate Matter (PMio) would exceed South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) thresholds for significance, therefore, would all be cumulatively significant if they cannot be mitigated on a project basis to a level less-than-significant The General Plan Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) identified the citywide increase in emissions as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Counal In the long-term, development consistent with the General Plan would result in significant operational vehicle emissions based upon the URBEMIS7G model estimates in Table 5 6-4 of the General Plan FEIR, therefore, would all be cumulatively significant if they cannot be mitigated on a project basis to a level less-than-significant The following mitigation measures shall be implemented 10) All industrial and commercial facilities shall post signs requiring that trucks shall not be left idling for prolonged periods (i.e., in excess of 10 minutes). C, D, E,F,G 133 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2006-00223, DRC2006-00350, DRC2007-00029, SUBTT189179 & DRC2006-00341 Page 8 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources pp g Potentially Signdicant With Mitigation Than Significant No Im act Incorporated Impact Impact 11) All industrial and commercial facilities shall designate preferential parking for vanpools. 12) All industrial and commercial site tenants with 50 or more employees shall be required to post both bus and Metrolink schedules in conspicuous areas. 13) All industrial and commercial site tenants with 50 or more employees shall be required to configure their operating schedules around the Metrolink schedule to the extent reasonably feasible. 14) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate high-efficiency/low-polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters. 15) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping. After implementation of the preceding mitigation measures, the General Plan FEIR identified the citywide increase in operational emissions as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council • An Air Quality Impact Analysis, dated May 15, 2006, was prepared for this protect by Urban Crossroads The analysis concluded that, if mitigated, no significant level of emissions would result from the construction activity of this protect Additional mitigation measures to reach this level beyond those enumerated above are. 16) Use of Zero-VOC paints (assumes no more than 100 grams/liter of VOC) such as those listed by the SCAQMD of Super-Compliant Architectural Coating Manufacturers. c) As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 6), continued development would contribute to the pollutant levels in the Rancho Cucamonga area, which already exceed Federal and State standards The General Plan FEIR identified the citywide increase in emissions as a significant and adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council The project proposed is consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated d) Sensitive receptors are defined as populations that are more susceptible to the effects of pollution than the population at large The SCAQMD identifies the following as sensitive receptors long-term health care facilities, rehabilitation centers, convalescent centers, retirement homes, residences, schools, playgrounds, child care centers, and athletic facilities According to the SCAQMD, projects have the potential to create significant impacts if they are located within 1/4 mile of sensitive receptors and would emit toxic air contaminants identified in SCAQMD Rule 1401 The project site is located within 1/4 mile of a sensitive receptor Potential impacts to air quality are consistent with the Public Health and Safety Super-Element within the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan During construction, there is the possibility of fugitive dust to be generated from grading the site The mitigation measures listed under b) above will reduce impact to less-than-significant levels e) Typically, the uses proposed do not create objectionable odors No adverse impacts are anticipated C, D, E,F,G 134 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2006-00223, DRC2006-00350, DRC2007-00029, SUBTT189179 & DRC2006-00341 Page 9 C Less Than ' Signrficant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources hh g Potentially Sgrnficant With Mdigation Than Signficant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact 4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the project a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or () () () (/) through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U S. Fish and Wildlife Service b) Have a substantial adverse effect on riparian habitat or () () () (/) other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected () () () (/) wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native () () () (/) resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting () () (/) ( ) biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat () () () (/) Conservation Plan, Natural Community conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or State habitat conservation plan Comments: a) The project site is located in an area developed with residential, commercial, and agricultural uses The site has been previously disrupted since at least 1927 with intense agricultural activity which has completely replaced the native biological diversity of the site According to the General Plan Exhibit IV-3, and Section 5 3 of the General Plan FEIR, the project site is not within an area of sensitive biological resources, therefore, development will not adversely affect rare or endangered species of plants or animals because of the fact that the protect is surrounded by urbanized land uses and is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Plan b) The project site is located in an urban area with no natural communities No riparian habitat exists on-site, meaning the project will not have any impacts c) No wetland habitat is present on-site As a result, project implementation would have no impact on these resources d) The majority of the surrounding area has been or is being developed, thereby disrupting any wildlife corridors that may have existed No adverse impacts are anticipated C, D, E,F,G 135 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2006-00223, DRC2006-00350, DRC2007-00029, SUBTT189179 & DRC2006-00341 Page 10 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP g Potentially Signifcant with Mdigation Than Signihcant No Im act Incorporated Impact Impact e) There are heritage trees on the protect site, therefore, the proposed protect is in conflict with the local ordinance An Arborist Report and Tree Survey, dated April 18, 2006, was prepared by Steve F Andresen for the project site Based on the analysis of this report, no fewer than 12 trees on the site are heritage trees of average or better condition These trees will need to be removed in order to accommodate the grading and siting of the project In order to mitigate the impact of their removal, the following measure is necessary. 1) A Tree Removal Permit must be approved that provides for the replacement of the 12 trees on a 1:1 ratio basis with no fewer than two California Sycamores (Platanus Racemosa) placed in a prominent location in the project. f) The protect site is not located within a conservation area according to the General Plan, Open Space and Conservation Plan, Exhibit IV-4. No conflicts with habitat conservation plans will occur 5. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the pro~ect• a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance () () () (/) of a historical resource as defined in § 15064 5~ b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance () (/) () ( ) of an archeological resource pursuant to § 15064 5~ c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological () (/) () ( ) resource or site or unique geologic feature d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred () () () (/) outside of formal cemeteries Comments: a) The protect site has not been identified as a "Historic Resource" per the standards of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 2 24 (Historic Preservation) There will be no impact b) There are no known archaeological sites or resources recorded on the project site, however, the Rancho Cucamonga area is known to have been inhabited by Native Americans according to the General Plan FEIR (Section 511) Construction activity, particularly grading, soil excavation, and compaction, could adversely affect or eliminate existing and potential archaeological resources The following mitigation measures shall be implemented 1) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will: Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value. • Consider establishing provisions to require incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point. Pursue educating the public about the area's archaeological heritage. C, D, E,F,G 136 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2006-00223, DRC2006-00350, DRC2007-00029, SUBTT189179 & DRC2006-00341 Page 11 • Less Than Sgndicant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources pP g Potentially Sgnificant With Mmgauon Than Sgnrficant No Im act Inco orated Im ad Impact Propose mitigation measures and recommend conditions of approval to eliminate adverse project effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, following appropriate CEQA guidelines. Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the project area. Submit one copy of the completed report with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. c) The General Plan FEIR (Section 5 11) indicates that the Rancho Cucamonga area is on an alluvial fan. According to the San Bernardino County database, no paleontological sites or resources have been recorded within the City of Rancho Cucamonga or the sphere-of-influence, including the project site, however, the area has a high sensitivity rating for paleontological resources The older alluvium, which would have been deposited during the wetter climate that prevailed 10,000-100,000 years ago during the Late Pleistocene epoch of the Quaternary period, when the last "Ice Age" and the appearance of modern man occurred, may contain significant vertebrate fossils The project site is underlain by Quaternary alluvium per General Plan Exhibit V-2, therefore, the following mitigation measures shall be implemented 2) If any paleontological resource (i.e. plant or animal fossils) are encountered • before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified paleontologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i.e., paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate. Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures: • Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing activities. • Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage. If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find. • Prepare, identify, and curate all recovered fossils for documentation in the summary report and transfer to an appropriate depository (i.e., San Bernardino County Museum). • Submit a summary report to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to San Bernardino County Museum. d) The proposed protect is in an area that has already been disturbed by development The protect site has already been disrupted by intense agricultural activity since at least 1927 No known religious or sacred sites exist within the protect area No evidence is in place to suggest the protect site has been used for human burials The California Health and Safety C, D, E,F,G 137 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2006-00223, DRC2006-00350, DRC2007-00029, SUBTT189179 & DRC2006-00341 Page 12 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources pp g Potentially Sgrnhcant With Mitigation Than Signdicant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Code (Section 7050 5) states that if human remains are discovered on-site, no further disturbance shall occur until the County Coroner has made a determination of origin and disposition pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 5097 98 As adherence to State regulations is required for all development, no mitigation is required in the unlikely event human remains are discovered on-site No adverse impacts are anticipated 6. GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Would the pro/ect a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving• i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated () () () (/) on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known faulty Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42 ii) Strong seismic ground shakings () () () (/) iii) Seismic-related ground failure, including () () () (/) liquefaction iv) Landslides () () () (/) b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoils () (/) () ( ) c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or () () () (/) that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B () () () (/) of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of () () () (/) septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater Comments: a) No known faults pass through the site and it is not in an Earthquake Fault Zone, nor is it in the Rancho Cucamonga City Special Study Zone along the Red Hill Fault, according to the General Pian Exhibit V-1, and Section 5 1 of the General Plan FEIR The Red Hill Fault, passes within 0 15 mile southeast of the site, and the Cucamonga Fault Zone lies approximately 3 2 miles north These faults are both capable of producing Mw 6 0-7 0 earthquakes Also, the San Jacinto Fault, capable of producing up to Mw 7 5 earthquakes, is northeasterly of the site and the San Andreas Fault, capable of up to Mw 8 2 earthquakes, is northeasterly of the site Each of these faults can produce strong groundshaking Adhering to the Uniform Building Code will ensure that geologic impacts are less-than-significant • • b) The proposed project will require the excavation, stockpiling, and/or movement of on-site soils The Rancho Cucamonga area is subject to strong Santa Ana wind conditions during September to April, which generates blowing sand and dust, and creates erosion problems C,D,E,F,G 138 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2006-00223, DRC2006-00350, DRC2007-00029, SUBTT189179 & DRC2006-00341 Page 13 • Less Than Significant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources pp g Potentially SigrnUcani w~tn Millga4on Than Significant No Impact Incorporated Im act Impact Construction activities may temporarily exacerbate the impacts of windblown sand, resulting in temporary problems of dust control, however, development of this project under the General Plan would help to reduce windblown sand impacts in the area as pavement, roads, buildings, and landscaping are established Therefore, the following fugitive dust mitigation measures shall be implemented to reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels 1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCA(~MD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PM~o emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 or re-planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM,o emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site. Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction. 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM~o emissions from the site during such episodes. 4) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWGICB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions. • c) The General Plan FEIR (Section 5 1) indicates that subsidence is generally associated with large decreases or withdrawals of water from the aquifer The project would not withdraw water from the existing aquifer The site is not within a geotechnical hazardous area or other unstable geologic unit or soil type according to General Plan FEIR Figure 5 1-2 Soil types on-site consist of Soboba Gravelly Loamy Sand Soil association according to General Plan FEIR Exhibit 5 1-3 No adverse impacts are anticipated d) The majority of Rancho Cucamonga, including the project site, is located on alluvial soil deposits These types of soils are not considered to be expansive. Soil types on-site consist of Soboba Gravelly Loamy Sand Soil association according to General Plan Exhibit V-3 and General Plan FEIR Exhibit 5 1-3 These soils are typically acceptable for construction No adverse impacts are anticipated e) The project will connect to, and be served by, the existing local sewer system for wastewater disposal No septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal is proposed • 7. HAZARDS AND WASTE MATERIALS. Would the project a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the () () () (/) environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the () () () (/) environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or () () () (/) acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within 1/4 mile of an existing or proposed school C, D, E,F,G 139 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2006-00223, DRC2006-00350, DRC2007-00029, SUBTT189179 & DRC2006-00341 Page 14 Less Than Sigrnficant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP g Potentially Significant With Mrtigatwn Than Signficant No Im act Incor orated Impact Im act d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of () () () (/) hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962 5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment e) For a protect located within an airport land use plan or, () () () (/) where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would () () () (/) the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an () () () (/) adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, () () () (/) injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands~ Comments: • a) The project will not involve the transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials The City participates in a countywide interagency coalition that is considered a full service Hazardous Materials Division that is more comprehensive that any other in the state The City is in the process of developing an Emergency Operations Plan to meet State and Federal requirements The City has approved a Local Hazard Mitigation Plan which has received State and Federal approvals Compliance with Federal, State, and local regulations concerning the storage and handling of hazardous materials and/or waste will reduce the potential for significant impacts to a level less-than-significant No adverse impacts are expected b) The proposed project does not include the use of hazardous materials or volatile fuels The City participates in a countywide interagency coalition that is considered a full service Hazardous Materials Division that is more comprehensive than any other in the state The City is in the process of developing an Emergency Operations Plan to meet State and Federal requirements The City has approved a Local Hazard Mitigation Plan which has received State and Federal approvals Compliance with Federal, State, and local regulations concerning the storage and handling of hazardous materials or volatile fuels will reduce the potential for significant impacts to a level less-than-significant No adverse impacts are anticipated. c) There are no schools located within 1/4 mile of the project site The project site is located within 1 mile of the nearest existing or proposed school Typically, the uses proposed do not create ob~ectionabie odors No adverse impacts are anticipated d) The proposed project is not listed as a hazardous waste or substance materials site Recent site inspection did not reveal the presence of discarded drums or illegal dumping of hazardous materials No impact is anticipated C, D, E,F,G 140 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2006-00223, DRC2006-00350, DRC2007-00029, SUBTT189179 & DRC2006-00341 Page 15 • Less Than Significant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources pp g Potentially Significant With Mmgation Than Significant No Im act Incorporated Impact Impact e) The site is not located within an airport land use plan and is not within 2 miles of a public airport The project site is located approximately 3 1/3 miles northerly of the Ontario Airport and is offset north of the flight path No impact is anticipated f) The nearest private airstrip, Cable Airport, is located approximately 2 1/2 miles to the west of the City's westerly limits No impact is anticipated g) The City's Multi-Hazard Disaster Plan, which is updated every two years, includes policies and procedures to be administered by the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District in the event of a disaster Because the project includes at least two points of public street access and is required to comply with all applicable City codes, including local fire ordinances, no adverse impacts are anticipated h) Rancho Cucamonga faces the greatest ongoing threat from awind-driven fire in the Urban Wildland Interface area found in the northern part of the City according to the Fire District Strategic Plan 2000-2005; however, the proposed project site is not located within a high fire hazard area according to General Plan Exhibit V-7. • • 8. HYDROLOGY AND WATER DUALITY. Would the pro/ect a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge () () (/) ( ) requirements b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere () () () (/) substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e g ,the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted) c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site () () () (/) or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner, which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site () () () (/) or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner, which would result in flooding on- or off-site e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the () () () (/) capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality () () () (/) g) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as () () () (/) mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation maps h) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures that () () () (/) would impede or redirect flood flows C, D, E,F,G 141 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2006-00223, DRC2006-00350, DRC2007-00029, SUBTT189179 & DRC2006-00341 Page 16 Less Than Signdicant Less Issues and Su or%in Information Sources hh g Potentially Sgnificant With Mitigation Than Signdicant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, () () () (/) injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? ~) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow~ () () () (/) Comments: a) Water and sewer service is provided by the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD) The project is designed to connect to existing water and sewer systems The State of California is authorized to administer various aspects of the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit under Section 402 of the Clean Water Act The General Construction Permit treats any construction activity over 1 acre as an Industrial activity, requiring a permit under the State's General NPDES permit The State Water Resource Control Board (SWRCB) through the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB), Santa Ana Region, administers these permits • Construction activities covered under the State's General Construction permit include removal of vegetation, grading, excavating, or any other activity for new development or significant redevelopment Prior to commencement of construction of a project, a discharger must submit a Notice of Intent (NOI) to obtain coverage under the General Permit The General Permit requires all dischargers to comply with the following during construction activities, including site clearance and grading • • Develop and implement a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) that would specify Best Management Practices (BMPs) that would prevent construction pollutants from contacting storm water and with the intent of keeping all products of erosion from moving off-site into receiving waters Eliminate or reduce non-storm water discharges to storm sewer systems and other waters of the nation Perform inspections of all BMPs Waste discharges include discharges of storm water and construction protect discharges A construction project for new development or significant redevelopment requires an NPDES permit Construction project proponents are required to prepare a SWPPP To comply with the NPDES, the construction contractor of the project will be required to prepare a SWPPP during construction activities, and a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) for post- construction operational management of storm water runoff. The applicant has submitted a WQMP, prepared by Fuscoe Engineering on July 3, 2006, that identifies BMPs to minimize the amount of pollutants, such as eroded soils, entering the drainage system after construction Runoff from driveways, roads and other impermeable surfaces must be controlled through an on-site drainage system BMPs include both structural and non- structural control methods Structural controls used to manage storm water pollutant levels include detention basins, oil/grit separators, and porous pavement Non-structural controls focus on controlling pollutants at the source, generally through implementing erosion and sediment control plans, and various business plans that must be developed by any businesses that store and use hazardous materials Practices, such as periodic parking lot sweeping can substantially reduce the amount of pollutants entering the storm drain system The following mitigation measures would be required to control additional storm water effluent C, D, E,F,G 142 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2006-00223, DRC2006-00350, DRC2007-00029, SUBTT189179 & DRC2006-00341 Page 17 • Less Than Significant Less Issues and Su Ortln Information Sources Pp g Potentially Sgndicant With Mdigation Than SigniUcant No Impact Incorporated Impact Im act Construction Activities 1) Prior to issuance of grading permits, the permit applicant shall submit to Building Official for approval, Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 2) An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included in the Grading Plan, and implemented for the proposed project that identifies specific measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading. This Erosion Control Plan shall include the following measures at a minimum: a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-site as a result of this project will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame. 3) During construction, temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is • rainfall or other runoff. 4) During construction, to remove pollutants, street cleaning will be performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site. Post- Construction Operational 5) The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in the Water Quality Management Plan (WOMP) prepared by Fuscoe Engineering on July 3, 2006, to reduce pollutants after construction entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 6) Landscaping plans shall include provisions for controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides. Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth. Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of Grading Permits. b) According to CVWD, 43 percent of the City's water Is currently provided from groundwater In the Cucamonga and Chino Basins CVWD has adopted a master plan that estimates demand needs until the year 2030 The proposed project will not deplete groundwater supplies, nor will It interfere with recharge because it Is not within an area designated as a recharge basin or spreading ground according to General Plan Exhibit IV-2. The development of the site will require the grading of the site and excavation, however, would not affect the existing aquifer, estimated to be about 288 to 470 feet below the ground surface As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 9), continued development citywide will increase water needs and Is a significant Impact, however, CVWD has plans to meet this Increased need through the construction of future water facilities C,D,E,F,G 143 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2006-00223, DRC2006-00350, DRC2007-00029, SUBTT189179 & DRC2006-00341 Page 18 Less Than - Signdicant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP g Potentially Significant with Mitigation Than Significant No Im act Incor orated Impact Impact c) The protect will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff because of the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on a site, however, the project will not alter the course of any stream or river All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm dram facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows. The protect design includes landscaping of all non-hardscape areas to prevent erosion A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits Therefore, the protect will not result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site The impact is not considered significant d) The protect will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff because of the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on a site, however, the project will not alter the course of any stream or river All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows. A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits Therefore, increase in runoff from the site will not result in flooding on- or off-site No impacts are anticipated • e) The project will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff because of the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on a site, however, all runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows The protect will not result in substantial additional sources of polluted runoff A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the • Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits Therefore, increase in runoff from the site will not result in flooding on- or off-site No impacts are anticipated f) Grading activities associated with the construction period could result in a temporary increase in the amount of suspended solids in surface flows during a concurrent storm event, thus resulting in surface water quality impacts The site is for new development or significant redevelopment, therefore, is required to comply with the NPDES to minimize water pollution. The following mitigation measures shall be implemented• 7) Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Engineer for approval of a WIMP, including a project description and identifying BMPs that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable. The WOMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004. 8) Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, the applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e., a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Building Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit. g) The project site is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Exhibit V-5 No adverse impacts are expected • h) The project site is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Exhibit V-5 No adverse impacts are expected C,D,E,F,G 144 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2006-00223, DRC2006-00350, DRC2007-00029, SUBTT189179 & DRC2006-00341 Page 19 • Less Than Significant Less Issues and Su Ortln Information Sources PP g Potentially Significant With Mitigation Than Signdicant No Im act Incor orated Impact Im act The Rancho Cucamonga area is flood protected by an extensive storm drain system designed to convey a 100-year storm event The system is substantially improved and provides an Integrated approach for regional and local drainage flows. This existing system includes several debris dams and levees north of the City, spreading grounds, concrete-lined channels, and underground storm drains as shown in General Plan Exhibit V-6 The project site is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Exhibit V-5. No adverse Impacts are expected ~) There are no oceans, lakes, or reservoirs near the protect site, therefore impacts from seiche and tsunami are not anticipated The Rancho Cucamonga area sets at the base of the steep eastern San Gabriel Mountains whose deep canyons were cut by mountain streams Numerous man-made controls have been constructed to reduce the mudflow impacts to the level of non-significance within the City This existing system includes several debris dams and levees north of the City, and spreading grounds both within and north of the City. • 9. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the project a) Physically divide an established community O O O (/) b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or () () () (/) regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to, a general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or () () () (/) natural community conservation plan Comments: a) The site is located at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Grove Avenue with substantial frontage on the north side of Red HIII Country Club Drive and is characterized by residential and recreational development to the north and east and commercial development to the south and west The project will become a part of the larger community No adverse impacts are anticipated b) The project site land use designation is Mixed Use and Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) The proposed project includes a request to amend the General Plan to change the portion of the project designated Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) to the Mixed Use designation While this requested amendment to the General Plan may or may not conflict with any other planning practices, it does not significantly Interfere with any policies for environmental protection As such, no impacts are anticipated c) The project site is not located within any habitat conservation or natural community plan area. According to the General Plan Exhibit IV-3, and Section 5 3 of the General Plan FEIR, the project site is not within an area of sensitive biological resources, therefore, development will not adversely affect rare or endangered species of plants or animals because of the fact that the project is surrounded by urbanized land uses and is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Plan C, D,E,F,G 145 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2006-00223, DRC2006-00350, DRC2007-00029, SUBTT189179 & DRC2006-00341 Page 20 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources• PP g Potentially Signficant with Mitigation Than Signficant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact 10. MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the project a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral () () () (/) resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the State b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally important () () () (/) mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan Comments: a) The site is not designated as a State Aggregate Resources Area according to the City General Plan, Figure IV-1 and Table IV-1, therefore, there is no impact b) The site is not designated by the General Plan, Figure IV-1 and Table IV-1, as a valuable mineral resource recovery site, therefore, there is no impact 11. NOISE. Would the project result in a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in () (/) () ( ) excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive () () () (/) ground borne vibration or ground borne noise levels c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels () () () (/) in the protect vicinity above levels existing without the prolect~ d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient () (/) () ( ) noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the pro~ect~ e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, () () () (/) where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would O O O (/) the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels Comments: • • a) The project site is not within an area of noise levels exceeding City standards according to General Plan Exhibit V-13 at build-out However a Noise Study, dated June 12, 2006, (Revised), was prepared for the project by Urban Crossroads The study concluded that, if left unmitigated, the traffic related noise levels would exceed the City of Rancho Cucamonga standards. Mitigation measures listed below would reduce exterior and interior noise levels to less-than-significant levels C, D,E,F,G 146 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2006-00223, DRC2006-00350, DRC2007-00029, SUBTT189179 & DRC2006-00341 Page 21 • Less Than Signdicant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources pP g Potentially Signdicant with Mmgahon Than Signdicant No Impact Incor orated Impact Impact Exterior: 1) Construct a 5-foot high barrier for Lots (Units) 7 through 10 and Lots (Units) 72 through 92 facing Foothill Boulevard and Grove Avenue. 2) Construct a 5-foot high second floor balcony noise barrier for Lots (Units) 88 and 89 facing Foothill Boulevard. Interior: 3) Provide a "windows closed" condition requiring a means of mechanical ventilation for all homes. 4) Provide standard dual-glazed windows with a Sound Transmission Class (STC) rating of 26 or higher for all units and homes facing Grove Avenue and Foothill Boulevard. 5) To minimize the potential interior noise impacts, lots (units) facing Foothill Boulevard should be provided with weather-stripped solid core exterior doors, and exterior wall/roof assemblies should be free of cut outs and openings. • b) The uses associated with this type of project normally do not induce ground borne vibrations As such, no impacts are anticipated c) The primary source of ambient noise levels in Rancho Cucamonga is traffic The proposed activities will not significantly increase traffic, hence are not anticipated to increase the ambient noise levels within the vicinity of the project d) The General Plan FEIR (Section 5 7) indicates that during a construction phase, on-site stationary sources, heavy-duty construction vehicles, and construction equipment, will generate noise exceeding City standards The following measures are provided to mitigate the short-term noise impacts 6) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. • 7) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120-D, as measured at the property line. The developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120. Monitoring at other times may be required by the Building Official. Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building Official within 24 hours; however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building Official. If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted 8) The perimeter block wall shall be constructed as early as possible in first phase. C, D, E,F,G 147 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2006-00223, DRC2006-00350, DRC2007-00029, SUBTT189179 & DRC2006-00341 Page 22 Less Than Sgnficant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP g Potentially Significant With MrtigaUOn Than Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Im act The preceding mitigation measures will reduce the disturbance created by on-site construction equipment, however, do not address the potential impacts because of the transport of construction materials and debris The following mitigation measures shall then be required 9) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a Noise Mitigation Plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes. To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. e) The site is not located within an Airport Land Use Plan and is not within 2 miles of a public airport It is located approximately 3 1/3 miles northerly of the Ontario Airport and is offset north of the flight path No impact is anticipated f) The nearest private airstrip, Cable Airport, is located approximately 2 1/2 miles to the west of the City's westerly limits No impact is anticipated 12. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the project a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either () () () (/) directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure) b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, () () () (/) necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the () () () (/) construction of replacement housing elsewhere Comments: a) The protect is located in a predominantly developed area and will not induce population growth Construction activities at the site will be short-term and will not attract new employees to the area Once constructed, the proposed office portion of the mixed use project will have a limited number of employees, hence, will not create a demand for additional housing as a majority of the employees will likely be hired from within the City or surrounding communities No impacts are anticipated b) The project site contains no existing housing units No adverse impact expected c) The protect site is not residential land No impacts are anticipated • • C, D, E,F,G 148 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2006-00223, DRC2006-00350, DRC2007-00029, SUE;TT189179 & DRC2006-00341 Page 23 • Less Than Significant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources hP g Potentially Significant will, Mitigation Than Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact 13. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the project result in substantial adverse physical -mpacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, rn order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance ob/ectives for any of the public services. a) Fire protections () () () (/) b) Police protections () () () (/) c) Schools () () () (/) d) Parks? () () () (/) e) Other public facilities O O O (/) Comments: a) The site, located at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Grove Avenue, would be served by a fire station located approximately 1 4/5 mile from the protect site The protect will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities • Standard conditions of approval from the Uniform Building and Fire Codes will be placed on the protect so no impacts to fire services will occur No impacts are anticipated b) Additional police protection is not required as the addition of the protect will not change the pattern of uses within the surrounding area and will not have a substantial increase in property to be patrolled as the protect site is within an area that is regularly patrolled. c) The Central School District and the Chaffey Joint Union High School District serve the protect area Both school districts have been notified regarding the proposed development A standard condition of approval will require the developer to pay the School Impact Fees With this standard mitigation, impacts to the School Districts are not considered significant d) The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga The nearest park is located 3/4 of a mile from the protect site The protect will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities A standard condition of approval will require the developer to pay Park Development Fees No impacts are anticipated e) The proposed protect will utilize existing public facilities The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga The protect will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities Cumulative development within Rancho Cucamonga will increase demand for library services According to the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 9 9), the protected increase in library space under the General Plan will not meet the protected demand The General Plan FEIR identified the cumulative impact on library services as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council The proposed protect is consistent with the General Plan for which the EIR was prepared and impacts evaluated Since the adoption of the General Plan, the City has opened a new C, D, E,F,G 149 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2006-00223, DRC2006-00350, DRC2007-00029, SUBTT189179 & DRC2006-00341 Page 24 Less Than Signficant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources' hh g Potentially Significant With Mitigation Than Signrficant No Im act Incor orated Impact Impact library within the Victoria Gardens regional shopping center of approximately 22,000 square feet, which is in excess of the protected need Of 15,500 square feet at build-out of the City. 14. RECREATION. Would the pro/ect• a) Increase the use Of existing neighborhood and regional () () () (/) parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated b) Does the protect include recreational facilities or require () () () (/) the construction or expansion Of recreational facilities, which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment Comments: a) The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga The nearest park is located 3/4 Of a mile from the protect site This protect is not proposing any new housing or large employment generator that would cause an increase in the use of parks or other recreational facilities A standard condition Of approval will require the developer t0 pay Park Development Fees. No impacts are anticipated b) See a) response above 15. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC. Would the pro/ect a) Cause an increase in traffic, which is substantial in O O O (/) relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (i e , result in a substantial increase in Bather the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections) b) Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of () () () (/) service standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways c) Result in a change m air traffic patterns, including either () () () (/) an increase in traffic levels or a change m location that results m substantial safety risks d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature () () () (/) (e g , sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e g ,farm equipment) e) Result in inadequate emergency access () () () (/) f) Result in inadequate parking capacity () () () (/) g) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs () () () (/) supporting alternative transportation (e g , bus turnouts, bicycle racks) • • Comments: a) A Traffic Study, dated March 20, 2007, was prepared for this protect by RBF Consulting The analysis of the study determined that implementation of the proposed protect will generate 799 vehicle trips daily The proposed protect includes the development of 23 single-family C, D,E,F,G 150 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2006-00223, DRC2006-00350, DRC2007-00029, SUBTT189179 & DRC2006-00341 Page 25 • Less Than Signdicam Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources hh g Potentially Significant With MdigaUOn Than Significant No Im act Incor orated Im act Im aci units, 68 multiple-family units, 7 live/work units, and approximately 12,610 square feet of general office space As noted in the General Pian FEIR (Section 5 5), continued development will contribute to the traffic load in the Rancho Cucamonga area The proposed project is generally consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated The project is in an area that is mostly developed with street improvements existing or included in project design The project will not create a substantial increase in the number of vehicle trips, traffic volume, or congestion at intersections as the Level of Service (LOS) rating for the nearby intersections will remain at "C" with the forecast increase in trips and movements The project site will be required to provide street improvements (curb, gutter, and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site per City roadway standards In addition, the City has established a Transportation Development Fee that must be paid by the applicant prior to issuance of building permits Fees are used to fund roadway improvements necessary to support adequate traffic circulation No impacts are anticipated b) The Traffic Study, dated March 20, 2007, and prepared for this project by RBF Consulting estimates that the project will generate 151 two-way peak hour trips daily In November 2004, San Bernardino County voters passed the Measure I extension which requires local jurisdictions to impose appropriate fees on development for their fair share toward regional transportation improvement projects On May 18, 2005, the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted a Comprehensive Transportation Fee Schedule updating these development impact fees As a result, the San Bernardino County Congestion Management Agency waived the Congestion Management Plan (CMP) Traffic Impact Analysis reporting requirement. This project will be required, as a condition of approval, to pay the adopted Transportation Development Fee prior to issuance of building permits The project is in an area that is mostly developed with all street improvements existing The project will not negatively impact the level of service standards on adfacent arterials The project will be required to provide street improvements (curb, gutter, and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site No impacts are anticipated c) Located approximately 3 1/3 miles northerly of the Ontario Airport, the site is offset north of the flight path and will not change air traffic patterns No impacts are anticipated d) The project is in an area that is mostly developed The project will be required to provide street improvements (curb, gutter, and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site The project design does not include any sharp curves or dangerous intersections or farming uses The project will, therefore, not create a substantial increase in hazards because of a design feature No impacts are anticipated e) The project will be designed to provide access for all emergency vehicles and will, therefore, not create an inadequate emergency access One access point for the project at the southeast corner of the site is for emergency ingress and egress only No impacts are anticipated f) The project design has adequate parking in compliance with standards of the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code and will, therefore, not create an inadequate parking capacity No impacts are anticipated g) The protect design includes, or the protect will be conditioned to provide, features supporting transportation and vehicle trip reduction (e g ,bus bays, bicycle racks, carpool parking, etc ) C,D,E,F,G 151 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2006-00223, DRC2006-00350, DRC2007-00029, SUBTT189179 & DRC2006-00341 Page 26 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources hh g Potentially Significant with Mi4gaUOn Than Signdicant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact 16. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the project a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the () () () (/) applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board b) Require or result in the construction of new water or () () () (/) wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects c) Require or result m the construction of new storm water () () () (/) drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects d) Have suffiaent water supplies available to serve the () () () (/) project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment () () () (/) provider, which serves or may serve the project, that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to () () () (/) accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs g) Comply with Federal, State, and local statutes and () () () (/) regulations related to solid waste Comments: a) The proposed project is served by the CVWD sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga The project is required to meet the requirements of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board regarding wastewater No impacts are anticipated b) The proposed project is served by the CVWD sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga and RP-1 located within City of Ontario, neither of which are at capacity. The project is required to meet the requirements of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board regarding wastewater No impacts are anticipated c) All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits The impact is not considered significant d) The project is served by the CVW D water system There is currently a sufficient water supply available to the City of Rancho Cucamonga to serve this project No impacts are anticipated • • e) The proposed project is served by the CVWD sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga and RP-1 located within City of Ontario, neither of which are at capacity No impacts are anticipated C, D, E,F,G 152 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2006-00223, DRC2006-00350, DRC2007-00029, SUBTT189179 & DRC2006-00341 Page 27 • Less Than Significant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources ph g Potentially Significant With Mitigation Than Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Im act f) Solid waste disposal will be provided by the current City contracted hauler who disposes the refuse at a permitted landfill with sufficient capacity to handle the City's solid waste disposal needs g) This project complies with Federal, State, and local statutes and regulations regarding solid waste The City of Rancho Cucamonga continues to implement waste reduction procedures consistent with AB 939 Therefore, no impacts are anticipated L 17. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality () () () (/) of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the mayor periods of California history or prehistory b) Does the project have impacts that are individually () () () (/) limited, but cumulatively considerable ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future pro~ects)~ c) Does the project have environmental effects that will () () () (/) cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly Comments: a) The site is not located in an area of sensitive biological resources as identified on the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Exhibit IV-3 Additionally, the area surrounding the site is developed Based on previous development and street improvements, it is unlikely that any endangered or rare species would inhabit the site b) If the proposed project were approved, then the applicant would be required to develop the site in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan The 2001 General Plan was adopted along with the certification of a Program FEIR, Findings of Fact, and a Statement of Overriding Considerations for significant adverse environmental effects of build-out in the City and Sphere-of-Influence The City made findings that adoption of the General Plan would result in significant adverse effects to aggregate resources, prime farmland, air quality, the acoustical environment, library services, and aesthetics and visual resources Mitigation measures were adopted for each of these resources, however, they would not reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels As such, the City adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations balancing the benefits of development under the General Plan Update against the significant unavoidable adverse impacts (CEQA Guidelines Section 15092 and 15096(h)) These benefits include less overall traffic volumes by developing mixed-use projects that will be pedestrian friendly and conservation of valuable natural open space With these findings and the Statement of Overriding Considerations, no further discussion or evaluation of cumulative impacts is required C, D, E,F,G 153 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2006-00223, DRC2006-00350, DRC2007-00029, SUBTT189179 & DRC2006-00341 Page 28 c) • Development of the site under the proposed land use change would not cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly The Initial Study identifies construction-related emissions of criteria pollutants as having a potentially significant impact Proposed mitigation measures would further reduce emission levels Additionally, impacts resulting from air quality would be short-term and would cease once construction activities were completed The Initial Study identified potentially significant impacts associated with the exposure of people to increased noise levels. Mitigation measures contained in this Initial Study will ensure impacts are at less-than-significant levels. EARLIER ANALYSES Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or Negative Declaration per Section 15063(c)(3)(D) The effects identified above for this project were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in the following earlier document(s) pursuant to applicable legal standards, and such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis The following earlier analyses were utilized in completing this Initial Study and are available for review in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division offices, 10500 Civic Center Drive• (/) General Plan FEIR (SCH#2000061027, Certified October 17, 2001) (/) Master Environmental Assessment for the 1989 General Plan Update (SCH #88020115, certified January 4, 1989) (/) Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan EIR (SCH #87021615, certified September 16, 1987) (/) Foothill/Grove Mixed-Use Project Traffic Impact Analysis, RBF Consulting, Irvine, California, March 20, 2007 (/) Grove Avenue and Foothill Boulevard Residential /Commercial Development Noise Study, Urban Crossroads, Irvine, California, June 2, 2006, June 12, 2006 (Revised) (/) Foothill/Grove Mixed-Use Project Air Quality Impact Analysis, Urban Crossroads, Irvine, California, May 15, 2006 (/) Arborist Report and Tree Survey for Tentative Tract Redhill/Grove, Steve F Andresen Arborist Services, Riverside, California, April 18, 2006 • • C, D, E,F,G 154 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2006-00223, DRC2006-00350, DRC2007-00029, SUBTT189179 & DRC2006-00341 Page 29 • • • APPLICANT CERTIFICATION I certify that I am the applicant for the project described in this Initial Study I acknowledge that I have read this Initial Study and the proposed mitigation measures Further, I have revised the project plans or proposals and/or hereby agree to the proposed mitigation measures to avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant environmental effects would occur Applicant's Signature ~' ~GJ~1S~M-~ Date ~/ 3~ ! ~.C~~ ~~1 Print Name and Title. C, D,E,F,G 155 . ARBORIST REPORT AND TREE SURVEY FOR TENTATIVE TRACT REDHILL /GROVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA Prepared for: Mr. Charlie Buquet 10681 Foothill Blvd. Suite 395 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 • Prepared by: Steve F. Andresen Arborist Services 5516 Inspiration Drive Riverside, CA 92506 April 18, 2006 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ~u~ 1 ~ 2oa~ RECEIVED -PLANNING • C, D, E,F,G 156 TABLE OF CONTENTS SCOPE OF WORK ......................................................................Page 1 SUMMARY ...................................................................................Page 1 TREE LETTER GRADES ..................................................................Page 2 ae TREE SURVEY TABLE ................................................................P g s 3-4 SITE MAP / EXIBIT A .....................................................................Page 5 a e REFERENCES ..............................................................................P g 6 • ae BACKGROUND ............................................................................... P g 6 EXPERIENCE ...............................................................................Page 6 QUALIFICATIONS AND LIMITING CONDITIONS ......................................Page 7 C, D, E,F,G 157 Redhill/Grove • Steve F. Andresen April 18, 2006 Page 1 SCOPE OF WORK The scope of this report is to give a comprehensive overall view of the existing mature trees using guidelines established by the International Society of Arboriculture as follows: ^ On-site visit and inspection of 65 mature trees at the future building site at Foothill Blvd. and Grove Avenue in Rancho Cucamonga California. ^ Tree common and botanical names. ^ Tree specifications Height, width and caliper. ^ Tree comments and evaluation as to trees health and aesthetic quality. ^ Trees marked with numbered aluminum tags. ^ Site map with corresponding numbers and tree locations. • SUMMARY A site inspection was made on Saturday April 15, 2006 to inspect the onsite trees as outlined in the scope of work portion of this report. All existing large trees with trunk calipers over 4" where number and recorded in this report. A grading system was used to give a general outline of each individual trees condition. Health and aesthetic grades where given to each tree so the reader will have a general understanding of the trees current condition without going into a detailed analysis of each individual tree. Trees selected to be preserved for the new landscape must have a detailed report to assure proper tree health, condition, and root and branch structure to help ensure survivability during relocation, should relocation be needed. All trees where visually inspected for this report from ground level, no climbing or m depth inspections where done. FINDINGS: The majority of the property is being used for growing strawberries; the farm has a retail facility on site as well. On the strawberry acreage are 35 of the 65 trees and are spread out over the land. The remaining 30 trees are growing on the remaining property where there are three residences. Most all trees are mature and of average health and condition for their growing locations and have been maintained in a reasonable fashion. No trees appear to be in a hazardous condition upon my visual inspections. There are Olive trees on site growing in the strawberry field that have been . severely topped with all of the foliage stripped to allow for maximum sunlight for the crops. These trees should be removed due to their condition from pruning. C, D, E,F,G 158 Redhill/Grove Steve F. Andresen • April 18, 2006 Page 2 LETTER GRADES FOR HEALTH AND AESTHETIC QUALITY "A" -Tree in outstanding condition. A tree with an "A" grade will have excellent trunk and branch structure, vigorous new growth and healthy leaf color. "B" -Tree in good condition. A tree with a "B" grade will have good trunk and branch structure with some slight defects that will not adversely affect the tree long term condition. Leaf color and general health are good. "C" -Tree in average condition. Most trees growing in a landscape setting will be in average condition. Trees may have branching and trunk defects from improper pruning and maintenance. In general letter "C" grade trees are healthy and will continue to grow in the landscape. "D" -Tree in below average condition. A tree with a "D" grade will have poor trunk and branch structure, limb and leaf die back with stunted growth and overall plant stress. "E" -Tree in severe decline that should be removed. Some grade "E" trees may look healthy from a distance but will have major trunk or structural defects warranting removal. • C, D, E,F,G 159 Redhill /Grove Rancho Cucamonga, California Tree Survey Page 3 ID # Species Common Name =~ ~W = LL w f- frW ~ LL 0' a W -rV ~ z J o `~ ~ U ~ F o W ~ omments 1 Pecan Pecan 45 35 19 C C Average to speGes for location 2 Junl ruS torulOSa HOII OOd Jumper 20 25 18 C C GroHnng at the footing of fans house 3 XylOSma congestum Shln X losma 20 15 9 C C Growing at the footing of fans house 4 X losma COngestum Shln X IOSma 25 22 12 C C Growing at the footing of farm house 5 Sequoia sem erwrenS Redwood 30 15 17 D D Die back, poor health /Recommend removal 6 Ilex COmutB Chinese HOII 23 18 17 D D Poor quality and condrUon !remove 7 Ltqurdambar Sweet Gum 45 25 19 D C Decay m large lateral branch creating structural issues 8 Junr eras torulosa HOII ood Jumper 18 17 15 C C Good health and condition 9 Junt eras torulosa HOII OOd Jumper 18 35 31 C C Good health and condition 10 Olea europaea Olive 15 8 18 E E Very poor health and condition /topped / sfipped foliage 11 Ofea euro aea Olive 15 8 18 E E Very poor health and condition /topped / sfipped foliage 12 Olea euro aea Olive 15 8 18 E E Very poor health and condition /topped / sfipped foliage 13 O/ea europaea Olive 15 8 18 E E Very poor health and condition /topped / sfipped foliage 14 Olee euro aea Olive 15 8 18 E E Very poor health and condrbon /topped / sfipped foliage 15 Ole8 europaea Olive 15 8 18 E E Very poor health and condtion /topped /stepped foliage Lr urdambar Sweet Gum 50 25 22 D C Structural issues /large limb breakage with sucker growth 7 Jun/ eras torulOS8 HOII o0d Juniper 18 25 22 C C Nice condition and appearance 18 Fraxrnus specres Ash 20 13 B C C Not a landscape tree /probably from seedling dropped by buds 19 Fraxrnus s eC/es Ash 20 10 4 5 C D Not a landscape tree /probably from seedling dropped by birds 20 Schrnus molls Callfomra Pepper 15 15 12 C C MuIU-trunk tree / probabty from seedling dropped by buds 21 Eucal tus poi anthemos Silver Dollar Gum 60 36 34 D C Poor branch structure with large limbs sheenng of( 22 Prnus hale ensts Aleppo Pine 50 15 11 C C Group planting /dose proximity created narrow upnght growth 23 Plnus hale eRSts Alep 0 Plne 40 9 8 C C Group planting /dose proximity created narrow upnght growth 24 PrnuS halepensrs Aleppo Pme 40 8 6 5 C C Group planting /dose proximity created narrow upnght growth 25 Prnus halepensrs Ale p0 Plne 4D 9 8 5 C C Group planting /Gose proxtmrty created narrow upnght growth 26 PmuS hale ensts Ale po Pme 30 6 6 C C Group planting /Gose proximity created narrow upnght growth 27 Pinus halepensrs Aleppo Plne 25 9 6 C C G roup planting /Gose proximity created narrow upnght growth 28 Phoenix cananensrs Cana Island Date Palm - - - C C 8 feet of trunk height 29 Fraxrnus specres Ash 15 10 6 D C C ombined trunk measurement / included bark at trunk base 30 FraxlnuS SpeCreS Ash 15 10 5 D C C ombined trunk measurement / included bark at trunk base 31 Fraxrnus s eC/es Ash 13 8 6 75 D C C ombined trunk measurement / included bark at trunk base 32 QUercus egnfOlra Coast Llve Oak 20 9 6 5 C D S eedling sprouted in grove of plants and trees 33 Ulmus parwfolla Chinese Elm 15 15 6 25 D D P oor strudure / multi trunk tree Ulmus paNrfOlla Chinese Elm 18 18 8 D D P oor structure / multi trunk tree 35 Ulmus parv/folra ChlneSe Elm 18 15 8 5 D D P oor structure I multi trunk tree 36 Zelkova sen'ata S awleaf Zelkova 25 20 11 5 D D B ranch rot in main trunk scaffolding Legend C , D , E , F , G 160 Prepared by Steve F Andresen A= Outstanding 6= Good C=Average D=Below Average E= Remove 4/18/06 Redhill /Grove Rancho Cucamonga, California Tree Survey Page 4 ID # Species Common Name = ~ W =LL O ~ ~ W a~ ~ a w J V ~z = „--, o ~~ U W F c M "'~ ommentS 37 Arbutus unedo Strawbe Tree 15 i6 B D B Poor main branch structure wrth inducted bark 38 Prunus rllicrfol~a Holl -leaf Che 25 15 s c C Poor trunk form and shape 39 Prunus lllicrfolie Holl -leaf Che 20 12 9 5 D C Mayor trunk rot along tree base 40 Platanus recemOSa Calrfomla S Comore BO 35 26 B B Very large tree rn casually good condition and structure 41 Platanus racemOSa Caltforrna S Comore BO 60 27 B B very large tree rn casually good condition and structure 42 Fraxrnus S eCl@S ASh 46 60 36 C C Average condrtion for spades and growing Iodation 43 Fraxrnus specres Ash 45 18 16 D D Multi trunk tree m poor condition 44 Fraxrnus S acres Ash 45 25 17 D C Inducted bark m main branch structure 45 Fraxrnus s ecies Ash 45 25 19 C C Average condtion for spades and growing lodatron 46 VibumUm Vlbumum 16 15 12 5 E E Die back of mom trunk and txandres 47 VrbumUm Viburnum 1 B 20 27 5 C C Average condition for spades and growing lopdon 48 Lr ustrum Privet 12 8 7 D D Combined trunk tree m poor condition 49 Prunus rlliCrfoke Holl -leaf Che 16 8 4 C C Average condrtion for spades and grov~nng lodatron 50 MorUS elbe Whlte Mulbe 25 30 19 D D Poor structure and condition due to groHnng location 51 Lr ustrvm Privet 13 14 13 D C Inducted bark and rot on mom branching 52 Prunus rllicrfolra HoII -leaf Che 20 zo 1 s D c Trunk rot at base of tree 53 Avocado Avocado 22 12 11 D C Topped tree with large sucker growth 54 Prunus llllcrfo/la H011 -leaf Che 25 15 11 E E Severe die back of entire upper porton of tree 55 Prunus dllCrfolra Holl -leaf Che 18 12 6 D C Some limb dre bads from stressed condition 56 La erstroemra rnd~Ca Crape Myrtle 20 20 11 B B Good branch structure / Deaduous at dine of inspection 57 Acer sacchannum Silver Maple so a5 a5 B B Average condition for spades and groNnng location 58 Acer sacchannum Silver Maple 60 30 37 C C Average condition for spades and growing location 59 unknown specres Unknown specles 14 15 7 5 D C Mulct trunk tree with poor mom branch structure 60 Washrngtonra hybrid Pelm - - - C C 35' Brown trunk height /Growing at base of palm # 61 61 Phoenrx cananensrs Cana Island Date Patin - - - C C 25' Brown trunk height / Grovnng at base of palm # 60 62 Phoenrx cananensrs Cana Island Date Palm - - - B B 8' Brown trunk height 63 Quercus agnfOlra Coast Live Oak 16 15 5 C C Growing in dose proximity to tree number # 26 at fence 64 Prnus cananensrs Cana Island Pafm 70 30 26 B B Good condition for specles and location 65 Apricot ApnCOt 13 15 9 D D P oor condition from growing under tree # 64 • Legend C, D, E, F, G 161 A= Outstanding B= Good C=Average D=Below Average E= Remove Prepared by Steve F Andresen 4/18/06 • .~ L .~ U U O M~ • 0 'L^ V ~_ d C~ G • . -- c - a~ ~ _ ' ~ ~' c . c '' ~ Q ~ __ -~ O '- ~tfl A. - ~ u- (fl ~ - - ~ ~ m o v ~ ~ m-, ~,, r ~ ~ ~ ~ ao L U ~ M '~! - ~ ------ ~D ~ - ~ ----_~ - - ~ fn ~ w h O __ _- ~ ~ M N ~ N ~-.~- N ~ ~_ Y~ ~ tp ~ ~ ~. ~ M O ~~~ _ _ O ~ Z _ _ _ ~e!' ~ a ~ - ~ r~ _~_ ~ _ Os -- ~ ~~ ~ -~' ~ N i _r 0--~ - - - --- - - -- -- --- O N N r , M r, ~-M i ~ - M - _ ___- --- -~- , -- _ _- - - --_-_ J i --- -L- ---' I _~ _ _ ~,-_- ~ ~ ~ I ---- - - ~ _ _ ' r- -- J -~ - ~~ -~- I -_ ~I ry _ _ _ I.-~I I YJ .- ~I _ yl ~ f ' -- I ,_~ _ _ _ ~ - .~_ _ _ I _ ' -- ^-. _'- -_ -- O _ - -- -• - _ -- ~ I r- -- - = -- ~- _ r ~ ~ I 1 h O _ _" --_ _ N - - - ---- ~ -- ~ - - _ M-~ - _ - _ ----- _ _ - ~ -- ~ - ' I _-- i ~ I ~~ - ___ ,__ - M ~ - - ~ - -- - i .- _ . - -- _ _ _ __-_______ - ti C - - -- - 0 _ - - ~ _--_ -- - - - - ~ J - J -- - - ~ -- _ - - - - ------ -- = - - __ - -- X _ --_ _ .T - -- --- -----_ _ _ -~ -__ W I- C,D,E,F,G 162 RedhilUGrove Steve F. Andresen April 18, 2006 Page 6 REFERENCES • Guide for Plant Appraisal, Council of Tree & Landscape Appraisers, Stn Edition, 2000. Species Class cation and Group Assignment, Intemational Society of Arboriculture /Western Chapter of Arboriculture, 1992. • Landscape Plants for Westem Regions, Bob Perry, 1996. BACKGROUND I am currently employed by GroWest Nurseries supplying the needs of clients and contractors throughout the Inland Empire and Los Angeles counties. In addition to my arborist certification, I am a member of the Western Chapter of Certified Arborists and Street Tree Seminars Inc. Throughout my twenty-five year career, I have been involved in continuing my education in by attending numerous seminars by such organizations as the International Society of Arboriculture, Street Tree Seminars, Intemational Plant Propagators and California Association of Nurseryman. • EXPERIENCE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA On the cities preferred arborist list. ARCHITERA DESIGN GROUP Mr. Richard Krumnweidi (909) 484-2800 Prepared report as to the health and feasibility of relocating large specimen pine trees at the Magnolia Gaileria at Tyler, Riverside, CA RICHARD POPE ~ ASSOCIATES Mr. Richard Pope (909) 888-5568 Prepared arborist report at the Norton Air Base in San Bernardino, CA LRM LIMITED /LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE Mr. Steve Wood /Project manager (310) 387-6729 Prepared many reports including Sierra Madre Villas and Westfield Malls WILSON ASSOCIATES Mr. Scott Wilson (951) 353-2436 Prepared arborist report for site in Moorpark CA C, D, E,F,G 163 • Redhill/Grove Steve F. Andresen April 18, 2006 Page 7 QUALIFICATIONS AND LIMITING CONDITIONS I am a certified arborist in California # WC 2170 with the International Society of Arboriculture and am qualified to make this report. My inspection was a visual examination and in most cases will ensure the success of a project such as this. My report is based on the condition of the trees at the time of inspection. QUESTIONS AND COMMENTS Any questions or comments can be directed to: Steve F. Andresen / Arborist Services 5516 Inspiration Drive Riverside, CA 92506 ISA~WC 2170 (951) 788-1829 fax 788-1667 • -~_~ Steve ndresen Arboris Services WC # 2170 ~-/~' a~ Date: C,D,E,F,G 164 • • • • uRS~-n~ CROSSROADS 41 Corporate Park, Suite 300 Irvine, CA 92606 Prepared by: Bill Lawson, INCE Fernando Sotelo J.T. Stephens, INCE • Prepared for: Mr. Jason Kamm KAMM REALTY, INC. 16661 Ventura Boulevard, Suite 712 Encino, CA 91436 • GROVE AVENUE AND FOOTHILL BOULEVARD RESIDENTIAL /COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT NOISE STUDY CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA N June 2, 2006 ~~~ ~ ~' (aq June 12, 2006 (Revised) JN:03732-03 BL:FS:JS:cg z0®~ ~A~~,~C~ C, D, E,F,G 165 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................ 1-1 1.1 Exterior Noise Mitigation ................................................................... 1-1 1.2 Interior Noise Mitigation ........................................... ..................... 1-3 2 0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................ 2-1 3.0 NOISE FUNDAMENTALS ............................................................................. 3-1 3.1 Noise Descriptors ......................................................................... .. 3-1 3.2 Traffic Noise Prediction .................................................................... 3-2 3.3 Noise Control ........................................................................................ 3-2 3.4 Ground Absorption ............................................. ............................... 3-2 3.5 Noise Barrier Attenuation ................................................................... 3-3 4.0 NOISE STANDARDS .................... .......................................................... 4-1 4 1 Transportation Noise Standards .... ..... ................... .. ........... 4-1 4.2 Stationary Noise Standards ................... .......................... ........ 4-2 5.0 EXISTING NOISE LEVEL MEASUREMENTS . ........................... .......... 5-1 5 1 Measurement Procedure and Criteria ......... ................... .... ......... 5-1 5 2 Noise Measurement Locations ............... ......... .................... ....... 5-1 • 5 3 Noise Measurement Results ... ...... ................. .. ............ ... 5-3 6.0 METHODS AND PROCEDURES ... ................................................... 6-1 6.1 FHWA Traffic Noise Prediction Model .. .................. .... .. 6-1 6.2 Traffic Noise Prediction Model Inputs ...... .................................. 6-1 7.0 EXTERIOR NOISE ANALYSIS .................... ... .................. ...... ......... 7-1 7 1 Traffic Noise Level Assessment ....... .... .................... ........... 7-1 7.2 Noise Barrier .. ..................... .. .......... ............... 7-2 7.3 Future Exterior Noise Levels ......... ............... .... .. ... .... 7-2 7.4 Noise Control Barrier Construction Materials ........ .................... .. 7-5 7 5 Noise Impacts From Commercial Buildings On Site ................. .. .. 7-6 8.0 INTERIOR ANALYSIS .......................................................... ........ .. 8-1 8.1 Interior Noise Reduction Methodology ..... .............. .. .......... 8-1 8.2 Interior Noise Level Assessment .............. ........................... ........ 8-1 • C, D,E,F,G 166 • APPENDICES CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA NOISE STANDARDS ........................................ A STUDY AREA PHOTOS ......................................................................................... B NOISE LEVEL MEASUREMENTS COMPUTER PRINTOUTS ........................... C Leq TO CNEL CONVERSION ............................................. .............................. D TRAFFIC NOISE IMPACT COMPUTER PRINTOUTS ............................................ E GRADING PLANS ............................................................................... .......... F INTERIOR NOISE REDUCTION CALCULATIONS ..................................... ....... G • • C, D, E,F,G 167 LIST OF EXHIBITS • EXHIBIT PAGE 1-A SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS .............................................. 1-2 2-A LOCATION MAP ....................................................................................... 2-2 2-B SITE PLAN ......... ......................................... ..................................... 2-3 5-A NOISE MONITORING LOCATIONS .... ............. .......... 5-2 .......................... C, D, E,F,G 168 • LIST OF TABLES TABLE PAGE 5-1 EXISTING (AMBIENT) NOISE LEVEL MEASUREMENTS ....................... 5-4 6-1 ROADWAY PARAMETERS ..... ............................................................... 6-2 6-2 HOURLY TRAFFIC FLOW DISTRIBUTION ......................................... 6-4 7-1 FUTURE EXTERIOR NOISE LEVELS (dBA CNEL) .................................. 7-3 7-2 FUTURE BALCONY EXTERIOR NOISE LEVELS (dBA CNEL) ............... 7-4 8-1 INTERIOR NOISE REDUCTION CALCULATIONS (dBA CNEL) ............ 8-2 8-2 FIRST FLOOR INTERIOR NOISE IMPACTS (dBA CNEL) ...................... 8-3 8-3 SECOND FLOOR INTERIOR NOISE IMPACTS (dBA CNEL) ................. 8-4 • C, D, E,F,G 169 GROVE AVENUE AND FOOTHILL BOULEVARD RESIDENTIAL /COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT NOISE STUDY CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY A preliminary noise analysis has been completed to determine the exterior and interior noise exposure and the necessary noise mitigation measures for the proposed Grove Avenue and Foothill Boulevard residential/commercial development, consisting of approximately 72 multi-family residential dwelling units, 32 single family residential dwelling units and 14,300 square feet of commercial retail space. The proposed project is located on the northeast corner of Grove Avenue and Foothill Boulevard in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. • The results of this analysis indicate that future vehicle noise from Foothill Boulevard and Grove Avenue are the principal source of community noise that will impact the site. The • site may also experience some sporadic, impact noises from the gas station located to the south of the site and the commercial property on the southwest corner of the site but should generally be overshadowed by traffic from Foothill Boulevard. Based on the future buildout traffic projections, portions of the site will experience unmitigated exterior noise levels that will exceed the City of Rancho Cucamonga noise standards for transportation related noise impacts. To meet the City of Rancho Cucamonga 65 dBA CNEL exterior and 45 dBA CNEL interior noise level standards, the project should provide the following noise mitigation measures summarized below and shown on Exhibit 1-A: 1.1 Exterior Noise Mitigation • Construct a 5-foot high noise barrier for lots 7 through 10 and lots 72 to 92 facing Foothill Boulevard and Grove Avenue. • 1-1 C, D, E,F,G 170 EXHIBIT 1-A SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS ,~,,,~ - . ~1 - .. 1 ,~M.~ ~ , . ~ 1 '~ ,~ ~ ~ ;~ ,. i ,. w+ >~ Q I >' ~~ ~ ~~ ~ t~ 1 ~~ _ + _, . ---~_- _ __ __ ~ ~OOTNIL`L BLVp~`- _---- - . -_ e =---RED f~TLL OOUNTR'~~E~B-DFiIVE~ -- --- ~, __,~~ I ; ~ ~~~~ -- ='- - _ _ - . ~~~, GAS STATION LEGEND: ~~ `1 ,~ ,, ~ =LOCATION OF REQUIRED 5 0' NOISE BARRIER =LOCATION OF REQUIRED 5TC 26 RATED WINDOWS =LOCATION OF REQUIRED SECOND FLOOR 5.0' N015E BARRIER URBAN GROVE AVENUE AND FOOTHILL BOULEVARD RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT NOISE STUDY, Rancho Cucamonga, Calrforma - 03732 02 dwg s C, D, E,F,~-2171 • Construct a 5-foot high second floor balcony noise barrier for lots 88 and 89 • facing Foothill Boulevard. 1.2 Interior Noise Mitigation • Provide a "windows closed" condition requiring a means of mechanical ventilation for all homes. • Provide standard dual-glazed windows with a Sound Transmission Class (STC) rating of 26 or higher for all units and homes facing Grove Avenue and Foothill Boulevard. • To minimize the potential interior noise impacts, lots facing Foothill Boulevard should be provided with weather-stripped solid core exterior doors and exterior wall/roof assembles should be free of cut outs and openings. No additional exterior or interior noise mitigation is required to meet the City of Rancho Cucamonga 65 dBA CNEL exterior and the 45 dBA CNEL interior noise standards. With the recommended noise mitigation measures provided in this study, the proposed residential and commercial development will meet the City of Rancho Cucamonga noise standards for residential development. • 1-3 C, D, E,F,G 172 2.0 INTRODUCTION This report presents the results of a noise study for the Grove Avenue and Foothill Boulevard residential/commercial development. The proposed project site is located on the northeast corner of Grove Avenue and Foothill Boulevard in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, as shown on Exhibit 2-A. The proposed project presented in Exhibit 2-B includes approximately 72 multi-family residential dwelling units, 32 single family residential dwelling units and 14,300 square feet of commercial retail space. Included in the report is a discussion of the expected exterior and interior community noise environment and recommendations for control of the noise impacts for exterior and interior areas. In the following sections, noise exposures expected within the planned site are reviewed and compared to the applicable noise standards. • • 2-1 C, D, E,F,G 173 ~a CV m X Z W 0 a V 0 J "nd Oa`d1.3Nln 'ne a3Nb'8 ~O ~~ ~ J } z o ~ ~ O O z _ "1 ~ I _ ~ z ~ Z -- I I ~ z I ~ I ~ I m I ~^ I I Z IIIH a3a Q I I ~ ~ •nd anoa~ Zo a< 0 m~ ~N N 0 ~U 0 J W 7 W J Q F' z W J 0 m N ' J J W i ~ _ ~ Q W LL ~ O Cl J J_ W nd snawv~ Z a W z W Q W 2-2 -- " '~ ~ C, D, E,F,G 174 • • • EXHIBIT 2-B SITE PLAN • ., ~~~ ~~~;~. 1,l ~ ~ .,l ,,, ~' I I I ~~ W Q w Q URBAN GROVE AVENUE AND FOOTHILL BOULEVARD RESEDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT AIR QUALITY ANALYSIS ,Upland, Calrfornia - 03732 appendix dwg on s 2-3 C, D, E,F,G 175 3.0 NOISE FUNDAMENTALS Noise has been simply defined as "unwanted sound." Sound becomes unwanted when it interferes with normal activities, when it causes actual physical harm or when it has adverse effects on health. Noise is measured on a logarithmic scale of sound pressure level known as a decibel (dB). A-weighted decibels (dBA) approximate the subjective response of the human ear to broad frequency noise source by discriminating against very low and very high frequencies of the audible spectrum. They are adjusted to reflect only those frequencies which are audible to the human ear. 3.1 Noise Descriptors Equivalent sound levels are not measured directly but are calculated from sound pressure levels typically measured in A-weighted decibels (dBA). The equivalent sound level (Leq) represents a steady state sound level containing the same total energy as a time varying signal over a given sample period. The peak hour • Leq is the noise metric used by Caltrans for all traffic noise impact analysis. The Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL) is the weighted average of the intensity of a sound, with corrections for time of day, and averaged over 24 hours. The time of day corrections require the addition of five decibels to sound levels in the evening from 7 p.m. to 10 p m ,and the addition of ten decibels to sound levels at night between 10 p m. and 7 a m. These additions are made to account for the noise sensitive time periods during the evening and night hours when sound appears louder and it is weighted accordingly CNEL does not represent the actual sound level heard at any particular time, but rather represents the total sound exposure. The City of Rancho Cucamonga relies on the CNEL noise standard to assess transportation related impacts on noise sensitive land uses. • 3-1 C,D,E,F,G 176 3.2 Traffic Noise Prediction The level of traffic noise depends on the three primary factors: (1) the volume of the traffic, (2) the speed of the traffic, and (3) the number of truck in the flow of traffic. Generally, the loudness of traffic noise is increased by heavier traffic volumes, higher speeds, and greater number of trucks. Vehicle noise is a combination of the noise produced by the engine, exhaust, and tires. Because of the logarithmic nature of traffic noise levels, a doubling of the traffic noise (acoustic energy) results in a noise level increase 3 dBA. Based on the FHWA community noise assessment criteria this change is "barely perceptible". In other words doubling the traffic volume (assuming that the speed and truck mix do not change) results in a noise increase of 3 dBA. The truck mix on a given roadway also has a significant effect on community noise levels. As the number of heavy trucks increases and becomes a larger percentage of the vehicle mix, adjacent noise levels increase. • 3.3 Noise Control Noise control is the process of obtaining an acceptable noise environment for a particular observation point or receiver by controlling the noise source, transmission path, receiver, or all three. This concept is known as the source- path-receiver concept. In general, noise control measures can be applied to any and all of these three elements and a noise barrier is most effective when placed close to the noise source or receiver. 3 4 Ground Absorption To account for the ground-effect attenuation (absorption), two types of site conditions are commonly used in traffic noise models, soft site and hard site conditions. Soft site conditions account for the sound propagation loss over natural surfaces such as normal earth and ground vegetation. A drop-off rate of • 3-2 C, D, E,F,G 177 4.5 dBA per doubling of distance is typically observed over soft ground with landscaping, as compared with a 3.0 dBA drop-off rate over hard ground such as asphalt, concrete, stone and very hard packed earth. Based on our experience, soft site conditions better reflect the predicted noise levels. In addition, Caltrans own research has shown that the use of soft site conditions is more appropriate for the application of the FHWA traffic noise prediction model used in this analysis. 3.5 Noise Barrier Attenuation Effective noise barriers can reduce noise levels by 10 to 15 decibels, cutting the loudness of traffic noise in half. Noise barriers however, do have limitations. For a noise barrier to work, it must be high enough and long enough to block the view of a road Noise barriers do very little good for homes on a hillside overlooking a road or for building which rise above the barrier. A noise barrier can achieve a 5 dBA noise level reduction when it is tall enough to break the • line-of-sight. • 3-3 C,D,E,F,G 178 4.0 NOISE STANDARDS The City of Rancho Cucamonga has identified two separate types of noise sources: (1) transportation, and (2) stationary. To control transportation related noise sources such as arterial roads, freeways, airport and railroads, the City of Rancho Cucamonga has established guidelines for acceptable community noise levels in the Noise Element of the General Plan. To control stationary source /non-transportation related noise impacts (such as outdoor patio areas, speakers, trash compactors, air-conditioning units, etc.) in residential areas the City of Rancho Cucamonga has adopted a noise control ordinance. The City of Rancho Cucamonga Noise Standards are included in Appendix "A". 4.1 Transportation Noise Standards For noise sensitive residential uses, the City noise element adopted a standard for maximum outdoor noise levels of 65 dBA CNEL. To assess the noise • compatibility of different land uses, the City of Rancho Cucamonga has adopted a noise compatibility matrix. The noise compatibility matrix establishes the community noise exposure levels limits by land use category. At different exterior noise levels individual land uses are identified as "normally acceptable", "conditionally acceptable", "normally unacceptable" or "clearly unacceptable" The noise compatibility criteria are designed to ensure noise compatibility of proposed land uses with the predicted future noise environment. For residential land uses, an exterior noise level ranging from 55 to 70 is considered "conditionally acceptable": new construction or development should be undertaken only after a detailed analysis of the noise reduction requirements is made and needed noise insulation features included in the design. Conventional construction, but with closed windows and fresh air supply systems or air conditioning will normally suffice." 4-1 C, D,E,F,G 179 The City noise element requires an interior noise level of less than 45 dBA • CNEL. In the context of this noise analysis, the noise impacts associated with the project are controlled by the City Noise Element. 4.2 Stationary Noise Standards Due to the office buildings on the southwest corner of the site, some background noise produced from air conditioning units on top of the buildings and general parking lot activities. Though the noise may be audible at times, it will be generally overshadowed by traffic from Foothill Boulevard The most effective method to control community noise impacts from non- transportation noise sources (such as water pumps, air-conditioning units, etc.) is through the application of a community noise ordinance. The City of Rancho Cucamonga has not adopted a noise ordinance. • • 4-2 C, D, E,F,G 180 5.0 EXISTING NOISE LEVEL MEASUREMENTS To determine the existing noise environment, noise level measurements were taken at two (2) locations in the project study area. Exhibit 5-A provides the boundaries of the project study area and the noise level measurement locations. The noise measurements were recorded by Urban Crossroads, Inc. between the hours of 11'00 AM and 12:00 AM on May 18, 2006. Appendix "B" includes a photo index and study area photos. 5.1 Measurement Procedure and Criteria Noise measurements were taken using a Larson-Davis Model 824 Type 1 precision sound level meter, programmed in "fast" mode to record noise levels in "A" weighted form The sound level meter and microphone were mounted on a tripod, five feet above the ground and equipped with a windscreen during all measurements. The sound level meter was calibrated before and after the monitoring using aLarson-Davis calibrator, Model CAL 150. All noise level measurement equipment meets American National Standards Institute (ANSI) specifications for sound level meters (S1.4-1983 identified in Chapter 19 68.020.AA). 5.2 Noise Measurement Locations The locations were selected to represent the worst-case exterior noise impacts to the neighboring residential areas as shown on Exhibit 5-A. Noise monitoring locations were selected based on their respective impact potential. Site 1 was located on the southern portion of the project site 40 feet from the centerline of Red Hill Country Club Drive and approximately 150 feet from the centerline of Foothill Boulevard Site 2 was taken on the southeast portion of the project site approximately 100 feet from the centerline of Foothill Boulevard. 5-1 C, D, E,F,G 181 EXHIBIT 5-A NOISE MONITORING LOCATIONS • LEGEND: ~2 =NOISE MONITORING LOCATIONS • URBAN GROVE AVENUE AND FOOTHILL BOULEVARD RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT NOISE STUDY, Rancho Cucamonga, Caifiornia - 03732 03 dwg s C, D,E,f'~;tr 182 • 5.3 Noise Measurement Results The results of the noise level measurements are presented in Table 5-1. All noise measurements were monitored for a minimum time period of 10 minutes. Hourly noise levels measured in the range from 62 9 to 63.9 dBA Leq. These noise level measurements were converted to 24-hour CNEL based on a typical daily vehicle distribution and the time when the noise measurements were obtained. When converted to CNEL, the existing noise levels range from 66.0 to 67.0 dBA CNEL. The noise monitoring results printouts are included m Appendix "C." and the Leq to CNEL conversion calculations are included in Appendix "D". • • 5-3 C, D, E,F,G 183 TABLE 5-1 EXISTING (AMBIENT) NOISE LEVEL MEASUREMENTS OBSERVER LOCATION2 DESCRIPTION TIME OF MEASUREMENT3'4 PRIMARY NOISE SOURCE NOISE LEVELS (Leq dBA) NOISE LEVELS (Leq CNEL) Located on southern portion of the pro]ect site 40 feet from the Foothill Boulevard 1 centerline of Red Hiil Country Club 11 32 AM and Red Hill 62 9 66 0 Dnve and approximately 150 feet Country Club Dnve from the centerline of Foothill Boulevard Taken on the southeast portion of Foothill Boulevard 2 the pro]ect site approximateey 100 11 45 AM and Red Hdl 63 9 67 0 feet from the centerline of Foothill Country Club Drive Boulevard Noise measurements taken by Urban Crossroads, Inc on May 18, 2006 z See Exhibit 5-A for the location of the monitoring sites, and Appendix B for Study Aea Photos s Taken with a Larson Davis 824 Series Type 1 noise meter ° Weather condi4ons Clear, Temperature=79F, wind =calm • • U \UcJobs\_03600-04000\_03700\03732\Excel\[03732-02 xls]T5-1 5-4 C, D, E,F,G 184 6.0 METHODS AND PROCEDURES The following section outlines the methods and procedures used to model and analyze the future noise environment. 6.1 FHWA Traffic Noise Prediction Model The projected roadway noise impacts from vehicular traffic were projected using a computer program that replicates the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) Traffic Noise Prediction Model- FHWA-RD-77-108 (the "FHWA Model"). The FHWA Model arrives at a predicted noise level through a series of adjustments to the Reference Energy Mean Emission Level (REMEL). Adjustments are then made to the reference energy mean emission level to account for, the roadway classification (e.g., collector, secondary, major and arterial), the roadway active width (i.e ,the distance between the center of the outermost travel lanes on each • side of the roadway), the total average daily traffic (ADT), the travel speed, the percentages of automobiles, medium trucks and heavy trucks in the traffic volume, the roadway grade, the angle of view (e.g ,whether the roadway view is blocked), the site conditions ("hard" or "soft" relates to the absorption of the ground, pavement or landscaping) and the percentage of total average daily traffic (ADT) which flows each hour throughout a 24-hour period. 6.2 Traffic Norse Prediction Model I The roadway parameters including the average daily traffic volumes used for this study are presented in Table 6-1. The roadway classifications shown on Table 6-1 were obtained from the City of Rancho Cucamonga Circulation Element. Foothill Boulevard is classified as 4-lane mayor divided arterial with a volume capacity of 50,000 vehicles at 45 miles per hour. Grove Avenue is classified as a 2-lane collector with a volume capacity of 10,000 vehicles at 45 miles per hour. • 6-1 C, D, E,F,G 185 TABLE 6-1 ROADWAY PARAMETERS AVERAGE DAILY SITE ROADWAY CLASSIFICATION LANES TRAFFICz SPEED (MPH) CONDITIONS Foothill Boulevard Major Divided Arterial 4 50,000 45 Soft Grove Avenue Collector 2 10,000 40 Soft ' Roadway classification according to the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Circulation Element z Volume capaaty fora 4-lane secondary roadway at level of service "C" U 1UcJobs\_03600-04000\_03700\037321Excell[03732-02 xIsIT6-1 6-2 • • • C, D, E,F,G 186 • Table 6-2 presents the hourly traffic flow distribution (vehicle mix) used in for this analysis. The vehicle mix provides hourly distribution percentages of automobile, medium trucks and heavy trucks for input into the FHWA Model. • 6-3 C,D,E,F,G 187 TABLE 6-2 HOURLY TRAFFIC FLOW DISTRIBUTION MOTOR-VEHICLE TYPE DAYTIME (7 AM TO 7 PM) EVENING (7 PM TO 10 PM) NIGHT (10 PM TO 7 AM) TOTAL TRAFFIC FLOW Automobiles 77 5% 12 9% 9 6% 97 42% Medwm Trucks 84 8% 4 9% 10 3% 1 84% Heav Trucks 86 5% 2 7% 10 8% 0 74% ' Typical Vehicle mix in Southm California U \UcJobs\_03600-04000\_03700103732\Excel\[03732-02 xls]T6-2 6-4 • • • C,D,E,F,G 188 • 7.0 EXTERIOR NOISE ANALYSIS It is expected that the primary source of noise impacts to the site will be traffic noise from Foothill Boulevard and Grove Avenue along with sporadic impact noises from the adjacent gas station Due to traffic on these streets, noise levels will exceed the City of Rancho Cucamonga 65 dBA CNEL exterior noise level standard. 7.1 Traffic Noise Level Assessment • An analysis has been performed to predict the future noise environment and to determine the acoustical shielding which may be used to reduce the expected roadway noise impacts for the affected outdoor usable areas, if necessary. This source and receiver information was obtained from the grading plans available and identifies the relationship between the roadway centerline elevation, the pad elevation and the centerline distance to the noise barrier, the backyard observer and at the building facade to assess the exterior noise level impacts the backyard observers were placed five (5) feet above the pad elevation and ten (10) feet from the proposed barrier location. All first floor observers were placed five (5) feet above the proposed finished floor elevation at the building fagade with all second floor observers located fourteen (14) feet above the proposed finished floor elevation. Below a summary of the receiver and source geometry assumptions: Receiver Horizontal Geometry: Building facade according to the grading plans. Receiver Vertical Geometry: Height above pad for ground level receivers: • Exterior noise: • 1st Floor Interior: • 2nd Floor Interior: • 7-1 5 0 feet 5.5 feet 14.5 feet C, D, E,F,G 189 Source Horizontal Geometry: Source Vertical Geometry: All vehicles are located at the single lane equivalent acoustic center of the full roadway. Height above road grade: • Autos: 0.0 feet • Medium Trucks: 2.3 feet • Heavy Trucks: 8.0 feet 72 7.3 n~~in~ Qnrr~r~r Noise barrier recommendations were provided to reduce the predicted future noise impacts for the noise sensitive areas within the site These noise barriers performances were calculated using key input data equations that include the relative source-barrier-receiver horizontal separations, the relative source-barrier- receiver vertical separations, the typical noise source spectra and the barrier transmission loss. The noise barrier recommendations presented on Exhibit 1-A reflects a barrier location at the property line, between the adjacent roadways and exterior living areas. Indicated barrier heights are assumed to be the top of the slope, above pad or roadway elevation, whichever is greater Where applicable, the barriers should wrap around the ends of the dwelling units to prevent flanking of noise into the site. Future Exterior Noise Levels Using the FHWA traffic noise prediction model and the parameters outlined in Tables 6-1 and 6-2, calculations of the expected future noise impacts were completed Tables 7-1 and 7-2 present a summary of future exterior noise impacts Based on the FHWA traffic noise prediction model, the future unmitigated first floor exterior noise levels will range from 62 6 to 69.8 dBA CNEL. With the recommended exterior noise mitigation measures that include the 7-2 • • C, D, E,F,G 190 • • TABLE 7-1 FUTURE EXTERIOR NOISE LEVELS (dBA CNEL) LOT ROADWAY UNMITIGATED MITIGATED BARRIER HEIGHT (IN FEET) TOP OF BARRIER (IN FEET) 9 Grove Avenue 63 9 57 6 5 0 111 5 10 Grove Avenue 64 5 57 3 5 0 113 8 73 Foothill Boulevard 62 6 57.7 5 0 101 7 80 Foothill Boulevard 64 5 59 4 5 0 104 2 88 Foothill Boulevard 67 3 62 2 5 0 102 7 89 Foothill Boulevard 68 4 63.2 5 0 102 7 92 Foothill Boulevard 69.8 64 7 5 0 100 6 ' Noise prediction calculations are included in Appendix "E" U \UcJobs\_03600-040001_03700\03732\Excell[03732-02 xls]T7-1 7-3 C,D,E,F,G 191 TABLE 7-2 FUTURE BALCONY EXTERIOR NOISE LEVELS (dBA CNEL) UNIT NOISE SOURCES UNMITIGATED MITIGATED BALCONY ENCLOSURE HEIGHT (IN FEET} 88 Foothill Boulevard 67 3 61 7 5 0 89 Foothill Boulevard 68 3 62 6 5 0 U \UcJobs\_03600-04000\_03700\03732\Excel\[03732-02 xls]T7-2 7-4 • • C,D,E,F,G 192 • construction of a 5.0 high noise barrier, the mitigated exterior noise levels will range from 57.3 to 64.7 dBA CNEL. For the multi-family residences along Foothill Boulevard there are second floor balconies that are considered exterior living areas. Based on the FHWA traffic noise prediction model, the future unmitigated second floor exterior noise levels will range from 67.3 to 68.3 dBA CNEL for units 88 and 89. With the recommended exterior noise mitigation measures that include the construction of a 5 0 high patio enclosure, the mitigated exterior noise levels will range from 61.7 to 62.6 dBA CNEL. The computer outputs for the specific site impacts are included in Appendix "E." The grading plans used for this analysis are included in Appendix "F." 7.4 Noise Control Barrier Construction Materials The designed noise screening may only be accomplished if the barriers weight is at least 3.5 pounds per square foot of face area and have no decorative cutouts or line-of-site openings between shielded areas and the roadways. The • recommended noise control barrier may be constructed using one of the following alternative materials: 1. Masonry block; 2. Stucco veneer over wood framing (or foam core}, or 1 inch thick tongue and groove wood of sufficient weight per square foot; 3 Glass (1/4 inch thick), or other transparent material with sufficient weight per square foot; 4. Earthen berm; 5 Any combination of these construction materials. The recommended barrier must present a solid face from top to bottom. Unnecessary openings or decorative cutouts should not be made. All gaps (except for weep holes) should be filled with grout or caulking • 7-5 C, D, E,F,G 193 7.5 Norse Impacts From Commercial Buildings On Site • It rs possible that some background noise maybe audible from the commercial properties on the southwest corner of the property. Generally these impact noises are associated with general parking lot activities and air conditioning units on the roof of the buildings. The noise from the commercial property will usually be overshadowed by the traffic on Foothill Boulevard. • • 7-6 C, D, E,F,G 194 • 8.0 INTERIOR ANALYSIS To ensure that interior noise levels comply with the City of Rancho Cucamonga 45 dBA CNEL criteria, future exterior noise levels were calculated at the first and second floor building facades. 8.1 Interior Noise Reduction Methodology The interior noise exposure is the difference between the projected exterior dBA CNEL exposure at the building facade and the noise reduction of the structure. Typical building construction will provide approximately 12 dBA noise reduction with "windows open" and a minimum 20 dBA noise reduction with "windows closed". Several methods are used to improve interior noise reduction including: (1)weather-stripped solid core exterior doors; (2) upgraded dual glazed windows; (3) mechanical ventilation/air conditioning; and (4) exterior wall/roof assembles free • of cut outs or openings New construction will generally produce a "windows closed" noise reduction ranging from 25 dBA to 30 dBA. However, sound leaks, cracks and openings within the window assembly can greatly diminish the effectiveness 8 2 Interior Noise Level Assessment Table 8-1 presents the calculated interior noise reduction expected with standard windows of STC 26 Tables 8-2 and 8-3 present the future first and second floor interior noise levels. With the construction of a 5.0 foot high barrier, the exterior noise levels at the first and second floor building facade will range from 55 1 to 69.4 dBA CNEL The calculations show that the "windows open" condition will not provide adequate interior noise mitigation. • 8-1 C, D,E,F,G 195 TABLE 8-1 INTERIOR NOISE REDUCTION CALCULATIONS (dBA CNEL) NOISE REDUCTION WITH STANDARD PLAN ROOM FLOOR WINDOWS dBA CNEL ~ SF1 Bedroom 2 1 28 9 SF2 Living Room 1 28 4 Bedroom 2 2 28 7 LW Bedroom 3 2 29 9 M F2 Llving Room 1 24 8 Bedroom 2 2 28 1 ' Interior noise reduction calculations with standard dual glazed windows (STC 26) included in Appendix "F " U \UcJobs\_03600-040001_03700\03732\Excel\[03732-02 xlsjTB-1 8-2 • C, D, E,F,G 196 • TABLE 8-2 FIRST FLOOR INTERIOR NOISE IMPACTS (dBA CNEL) • • NOISE INTERIOR NOISE LEVEL FOR WINDOWS REQUIRED INTERIOR CALCULATED INTERIOR BUILDING FLOOR PLAN IMPACTS AT FA ADE OPEN CLOSEDZ NOISE REDUCTION NOISE REDUCTIONS 9 SF2 56 5 44 5 28 1 11 5 28 4 10 SF1 55 1 43.1 26 2 10 1 28.9 73 MF2 57 4 45 4 32 6 12 4 24 S 80 MF2 59 2 47.2 34 4 14 2 24 8 88 MFZ 61 9 49 9 37.1 16.9 24 8 89 MF2 62 9 50 9 38 1 17 9 24 8 ' A mirnmum of 12 dBA noise reduction is assumed with a windows open condition ~ With the calculated interior noise reduction with a windows closed condition and standard windows presented in Table 7-1 3 Includes standard windows with a minimum sound transmission class (STC) rating of 26 U \UcJobs\_03600-04000\_03700\037321Excel\[03732-02 x1s]T8-2 8-3 C,D,E,F,G 197 TABLE 8-3 SECOND FLOOR INTERIOR NOISE IMPACTS (dBA CNEL) NOISE INTERIOR NOISE LEVEL FOR WINDOWS REQUIRED INTERIOR CALCULATED INTERIOR BUILDING FLOOR PLAN IMPACTS AT FA ADE OPEN' CLOSEDZ NOISE REDUCTION NOISE REDUCTIONS 9 SF2 63 2 51 2 34 5 18 2 28.7 73 MF2 62 4 50 4 34 3 17.4 28 1 80 MF2 64 3 52 3 36 2 19 3 28 1 88 MF2 67.1 55 1 39 0 22.1 28 1 89 MF2 68 1 56 1 40 0 23 1 28 1 92 LW 69 4 57 4 39 5 24 4 29 9 ' A minimum of 12 dBA noise reduction is assumed with a windows open condition s With the calculated interior noise reduction with a windows closed condition and standard windows presented in Table 7-1 3 Includes standard windows with a minimum sound transmission class (STC) rating of 26 U \UcJobs\_03600-04000\_03700\03732\Excel\[03732-02 xis]T8-3 8-4 • • • C, D, E,F,G 198 To meet the 45 dBA CNEL interior noise standard an interior noise level reduction ranging from 10.1 to 24.4 dBA CNEL is required. The required interior noise level reduction can be accomplished with a "window closed" condition, requiring a means of mechanical ventilation and standard windows with a minimum sound transmission class (STC) rating 26 or higher for units and lots facing Grove Avenue and Foothill Boulevard. With these design features, the future interior noise levels will be below the City of Rancho Cucamonga 45 dBA CNEL interior level standard. Interior noise reduction calculations are provided in Appendix "G". The calculated interior noise reduction requires that exterior walls are concrete stucco. The stucco walls shall have a minimum Sound Transmission Class (STC) rating of 46. Typical walls with this rating will have 2x4 studs or greater, 16" o c. with R-13 insulation, a minimum 7/8" exterior surface of cement plaster and a minimum interior surface of 1/2" gypsum board. interior wall finish shall be at least 1/2-inch thick gypsum wallboard or plaster. • The roof system should have minimum 1/2" plywood sheathing which is well sealed to form a continuous traffic noise barrier with a minimum insulation of R-19 for all attic spaces. In addition, provide fresh air intake ducts at these lots based on the Uniform Building Code (UBC) requirements that state "in lieu of exterior openings for natural ventilation, a mechanical ventilating system may be provided Such a system shall be capable of providing two air changes per hour with minimum outside fresh air requirements. • 8-5 C,D,E,F,G 199 • • • • uRB~-N GROSSROA~S 41 Corporate Park, Suite 300 Irvine, CA 92606 Prepared by: Aric Evatt Haseeb Qureshi Prepared for: • J Mr. Jason Kamm KAMM REALTY, INC. 16661 Ventura Boulevard, Suite 712 Encino, CA 91436 FOOTHILL/GROVE MIXED-USE PROJECT AIR QUALITY IMPACT ANALYSIS CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA May 15, 2006 JN: 03731-02 AE:HQ:mt 6q RUC ~ ~ ~®®~ ~A~~l~~ C,D,E,F,G 200 • C,D,E,F,G 201 • • • TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAC;F 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .............................................................................. 1-1 1.1 Introduction ....... ............................................................................... 1-1 1.2 Air Quality Setting ................ ........................................................... 1-1 1.3 Air Quality Impacts ................................... .................................... 1-4 1.4 Recommendations .................. ................................. .. ................. 1-5 2.0 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................... 2-1 2.1 Purpose of Report .............................................................................. 2-1 2.2 Site Location ...................................................................................... 2-1 2.3 Existing Land Use and Zoning ............................................................. 2-1 2.4 Proposed Land Use and Zoning ..................................................... 2-1 2.5 Proposed Project ................................................................................... 2-3 3.0 EXIS TING CONDITIONS ............................................................ .................. 3-1 3.1 South Coast Air Basin ......................................................................... 3-1 3.2 Regional Climate .............................................................................. 3-1 3.3 Wind Patterns and City Location ......................................................... 3-4 3.4 Existing Air Quality .......................... .............................................. 3-5 3.5 Regional Air Quality ............................................................................. 3-5 3 6 Local Air Quality .......................................................................... 3-5 3.7 Regulatory Background ................................................................... 3-8 3.7.1 Federal Regulations .................................................................. 3-8 3.7.2 California Regulations ............................................................. 3-10 4.0 PROJECT AIR QUALITY IMPACT ................................................................. 4-1 4.1 Introduction .................................................... ................................ 4-1 4.2 Project Description ............................................................................. 4-1 4 3 Site Location . ............................................................... ............. 4-1 4.4 Standards of Significance .... ............................................................. 4-1 4.5 Project-Related Sources of Potential Impact .................................... 4-4 4.6 Construction Emissions........ ...... ........................................ .... 4-5 4.6.1 Demolitions .............. ...................................................... 4-5 4.6 2 Rough Grading ................................ .................................. 4-6 4.6.3 Paving . ....... .................................... ............................ 4-7 4.6.4 Building Construction ........................................ .............. 4-7 4.6 5 Architectural Coatings ....... ............................................... 4-8 4.6.6 Construction Workers Commuting ..... ....... ......................... 4-9 4.6.7 Construction Emissions Summary ...................................... 4-9 4.7 Operational Emissions Impacts ............................................. ...... 4-9 4.7.1 Vehicle Emissions ........................... .... ....... .............. 4-11 4.7.2 Fugitive Dust Refated to Vehicle Travel ... .... ............. 4-11 4.7.3 Combustion Emissions Associated with Natural Gas Use......... 4-11 C, D, E,F,G 202 4.7.4 Landscape Maintenance Emissions ..................................... 4-12 4.7 5 Emissions from Consumer Products ..................................... 4-12 4.7.6 Architectural Coatings .............................................................. 4-12 4.7.7 Operations Emissions Summary ................................................ 4-12 4 8 Air Quality Management Planning ....................................................... 4-14 4.9 Secondary Effects Evaluation ........................... ................ ..... 4-15 4.10 CO Hotspot Analysis ..................................................................... 4-16 5.0 RECOMMENDATIONS ................................................................................... 5-1 5.1 Standard Regulatory Requirements ...................................................... 5-1 5.2 Level of Significance .......................................................................... 5-1 • • • C, D, E,F,G 203 APPENDICES • URBEMIS COMPUTER MODEL OUTPUT -CONSTRUCTION IMPACT ANALYSIS ................................................................................................. A URBEMIS COMPUTER MODEL OUTPUT -OPERATIONAL IMPACT ANALYSIS .............................. ....... B ............ .......................... ..... PROJECT BUILDOUT CONDITIONS SIMPLIFIED CALINE4 CO HOTSPOT OUTPUT ............................................................................................ C SCAQMD RULE 401, RULE 403 ............................................................................. D LIST OF ZERO-VOC ARCHITECTURAL COATINGS MANUFACTURERS ............ E EXISTING TRAFFIC COUNTS AND EMISSIONS FACTORS USED IN CO ANALYSIS (PROJECT BUILDOUT CONDITIONS) ..................................................................... F WINDROSE EXHIBIT ........................................................................................ G C, D, E,F,G 204 LIST OF EXHIBITS EXHIBIT PAGE • 2-A LOCATION MAP ...................................................................................... 2-2 2-B SITE PLAN ................................................................................................. 2-4 • • C,D,E,F,G 205 LIST OF TABLES TABLE PAGE 3-1 AMBIENT AIR QUALITY STANDARDS ......................................................... 3-5 3-2 ATTAINMENT STATUS ............................................................... ................. 3-7 3-3 PROJECT AREA AIR QUALITY MONITORING SUMMARY - 2000-2005 ..... 3-8 4-1 MAX DAILY EMISSIONS THRESHOLDS ................................................... 4-2 4-2 LOCALIZED SIGNIFICANCE THRESHOLDS .............................................. 4-4 4-3 EMISSIONS SUMMARY OF PEAK CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES (POUNDS PER DAY) ....................................................................................... 4-9 4-4 SUMMARY OF PEAK OPERATIONAL EMISSIONS (SUMMERM/INTER) (POUNDS PER DAY) ................................................. 4-13 4-5 INTERIM YEAR (WITH PROJECT) CARBON MONOXIDE (CO) HOT SPOT LEVELS .................................................................................... 4-18 5-1 EMISSIONS SUMMARY OF PEAK CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES (POUNDS PER DAY) (MITIGATED) .... ................................. .................... 5-3 • C,D,E,F,G 206 FOOTHILL/GROVE MIXED-USE PROJECT AIR QUALITY IMPACT ANALYSIS i CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1.1 Introduction This analysis is intended to determine the impacts to air quality associated with the development of the proposed Foothill/Grove Mixed-Use project ("Project"). The proposed development consists of 14,000 square feet of general office, 23 single- family dwelling units, and 75 condominium dwelling units. The proposed project is located at the northeast corner of the Foothill Boulevard and Grove Avenue intersection in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Specifically, this air quality analysis will evaluate the potential inputs to air quality associated with the development (i e demolition, construction, and operations) of the proposed project. The analysis will also consider the potential for localized Carbon Monoxide (CO) "hot spots" resulting from traffic volumes and congestion near the project site. Lastly, emissions reduction measures will be identified to reduce the potential for significant air quality impacts due to construction or ongoing operations activity of the project. 1.2 Air Quality Setting The project site is located in the South Coast Air Basin within the jurisdiction of the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD). The Basin is bound by the Pacific Ocean to the west and the San Gabriel, San Bernardino, and San Jacinto Mountains to the north and east. Air quality monitoring near the project site for ozone (03), CO, nitrogen dioxide (NO2) and particulate sulfate in closest proximity to the project site is carried out 1-1 C,D,E,F,G 207 by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) at the Upland monitoring site located approximately 0.4 miles from the project site. Data for fine particulates (PM~o) and ultra-fine particulate matter (PM2 5) was obtained from the Ontario monitoring site located approximately 5.8 miles from the project site. Examples of sources and effects of the pollutants previously discussed are identified below: • Carbon Monoxide (CO): Carbon monoxide is a colorless, odorless, tasteless and toxic gas resulting from the incomplete combustion of fossil fuels. CO interferes with the blood's ability to carry oxygen to the body's tissues and results in numerous adverse health effects. CO is a criteria air pollutant. • Oxides of Sulfur (SO,~: Typically strong smelling, colorless gases that are formed by the combustion of fossil fuels. SO2 and other sulfur • oxides contribute to the problem of acid deposition. SO2 is a criteria pollutant. • Nitrogen Oxides (Oxides of Nitrogen, or NOX~: Nitrogen oxides (NOx) consist of nitric oxide (NO), nitrogen dioxide (NO2) and nitrous oxide (N2O) and are formed when nitrogen (N2) combines with oxygen (02). Their lifespan in the atmosphere ranges from one to seven days for nitric oxide and nitrogen dioxide, to 170 years for nitrous oxide. Nitrogen oxides are typically created during combustion processes, and are mayor contributors to smog formation and acid deposition. NO2 is a criteria air pollutant, and may result in numerous adverse health effects; it absorbs blue light, resulting in a brownish-red cast to the atmosphere and reduced visibility. • Ozone 03~: A strong smelling, pale blue, reactive toxic chemical gas consisting of three oxygen atoms. It is a product of the photochemical process involving the sun's energy. Ozone exists in the upper 1-2 C, D, E,F,G 208 atmosphere ozone layer as well as at the earth's surface. Ozone at the earth's surface causes numerous adverse health effects and is a criteria air pollutant. It is a major component of smog. • PM~o (Particulate Matter less than 10 microns): A mayor air pollutant consisting of tiny solid or liquid particles of soot, dust, smoke, fumes, and aerosols. The size of the particles (10 microns or smaller, about 0.0004 inches or less) allows them to easily enter the lungs where they may be deposited, resulting in adverse health effects. PM~o also causes visibility reduction and is a criteria air pollutant. • PMZ 5 (Particulate Matter less than 2.5 microns): A similar air pollutant consisting of tiny solid or liquid particles which are 2.5 microns or smaller (which is often referred to as fine particles). These particles are formed in the atmosphere from primary gaseous emissions that include sulfates formed from SO2 release from power plants and industrial facilities and nitrates that are formed from NOx release from • power plants, automobiles and other types of combustion sources. The chemical composition of fine particles highly depends on location, time of year, and weather conditions. • Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC): Volatile organic compounds are hydrocarbon compounds (any compound containing various combinations of hydrogen and carbon atoms) that exist in the ambient air. VOC's contribute to the formation of smog through atmospheric photochemical reactions and/or may be toxic. Compounds of carbon (also known as organic compounds) have different levels of reactivity; that is, they do not react at the same speed or do not form ozone to the same extent when exposed to photochemical processes. VOC's often have an odor, and some examples include gasoline, alcohol, and the solvents used in paints. Exceptions to the VOC designation include: carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, carbonic acid, metallic carbides or carbonates, and ammonium carbonate. 1-3 C,D,E,F,G 209 • Reactive Organic Gasses (ROG): Similar to VOC, Reactive Organic Gasses (ROG) are also precursors in forming ozone and consist of compounds containing methane, ethane, propane, butane, and longer chain hydrocarbons which are typically the result of some type of combustion/decomposition process. Smog is formed when ROG and nitrogen oxides react in the presence of sunlight. The EPA (under the Federal Clean Air Act of 1970, and amended in 1977) established ambient air quality standards for these pollutants. This standard is called the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS). The California Air Resources Board (GARB) subsequently established the more stringent California Ambient Air Quality Standards (CAAQS). Both sets of standards are shown in Table 3-1 (presented later in this report). Areas in California where ambient air concentrations of pollutants are higher than the state standard are considered to be in "non-attainment" status for that pollutant. 1.3 Air Quality Impacts The analysis indicates that the project has the potential to create an adverse air quality impact during short-term construction activity. The results of this analysis demonstrate that the project's short-term construction impacts can be reduced to less than significant levels after recommended emissions reduction measures are implemented. The project therefore will not result in a cumulatively significant impact during short-term construction activity. For long-term operational activity the project will not have a significant air quality impact as defined by either the Localized Significance Thresholds (LSTs) or regional daily emissions thresholds set forth by the SCAQMD. Since the project not expected to exceed the emissions thresholds set forth by the SCAQMD it is assumed that the project and other cumulative developments will not result in a cumulatively significant impact during operational activity. The proposed project 1-4 C,D,E,F,G 210 does not conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality management plan. The project is not expected to create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people. Lastly, the project generated traffic does not contribute to or create a local CO hotspot. 14 Recommendations Standard Regulatory Requirements During grading and construction activities, the applicant/builder shall comply with the requirements of SCAQMD Rule 401 and 403, such as water disturbed surfaces three times per day, and reduce vehicle speeds to less than 15 mph on unpaved roads (See Appendix D for a detailed list of Rule 401 and 403). Additional Recommended Measures to Reduce Impacts: • Use of construction equipment with low emission factors and high energy efficiency where possible. • Perform regularly scheduled engine maintenance to minimize equipment • emissions. • Time and Tune Engines and Reduce Idle Time for Equipment during grading and construction activity • Where feasible apply lean-NOx catalyst for off-road construction equipment. The following recommendations will help reduce construction related emissions of VOCs: • Use of Zero-VOC paints (assumes no more than 100 gram/liter of VOC) Appendix E contains a list of Zero-VOC architectural coatings manufacturers. 1-5 C, D, E,F,G 211 • THlS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK • 1-6 C,D,E,F,G 212 2.0 INTRODUCTION 2.1 2.2 2.3 24 Purpose of Report The purpose of this report is to evaluate the air quality impacts resulting from the proposed project. This initial section of the air quality impact analysis report describes the project and summarizes the atmospheric setting within the study area. Subsequent sections of the report describe the existing air quality setting for the study area; evaluate the project air quality impacts, and present recommended emissions reduction measures that should be implemented in conjunction with the proposed project. Site Location The proposed project is located at the northeast corner of the Foothill Boulevard and Grove Avenue intersection in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The project site and location area is shown on Exhibit 2-A. Existing On-Site and Surrounding Land Use The project site currently consists of agricultural land uses and three single-family dwelling units, all of which will be displaced by the proposed project. The implementation of the project will likely reduce fugitive dust emissions and odor associated with the current agriculture operations; however the project would generate new emissions of fugitive dust dunng construction and operational activity (discussed later in this report) Proposed Land Use and Zoning Proposed Zoning: Mixed-Use Proposed Land Use: Residential, General Office • • • 2-1 C, D, E,F,G 213 ¢a N ~_~ X W 0 Q V 0 J nd aab'J.3NIn nv aa~lda ~) ~~ ~ ~z • -^~ ~ I z ~---~ i z i ~ z Fes- ~ 0° ~ ~ IIIH t13a N 'nd 3nOa~ .J Q] J _J r O O LL nd sndwd~ • 2-2 C,D,E,F,G 214 '. 0 0 The project proposes to change the zoning for a portion of the project from Residential to Mixed-Use. 2.5 Proposed Project The proposed project is planned to include the construction of 14,000 square feet of general office, 23 single-family dwelling units, and 75 condominium dwelling units. The project land use plan is presented on Exhibit 2-B. For purposes of this analysis, the project is anticipated to be completed by year 2008. • • 2-3 C, D,E,F,G 215 EXHIBIT 2-B SITE PLAN ~< <o~ B. ' ,~ ~ _ ,,~ ~ 1, `t ' `' i Q y ~ ~~~ ~ 1 ~~t ` 54`.ssr` ~,, ti ` i ~' 1 ~~;~ I '~ VIA, I ~ 4 i 11 ~ I, ;, ~ ~ a li , I~ I , ~; ,~ -`~tl (i I O ~~~ I 'n ;;. _~ ,ale ' Y% " i r- csj e~ i '! ;~ ' ~, ~~~ .~ ----, ~ . <~~'.- .. L'C~gLbf~~ ~~ -' ~, „~-. REDa-III.~-SE3l-1fJTFiaFGL-6l6-DRfb'E-~ ~_~~~~~ ~ ~ ~~~~; - _ - ~ti~ ,, by •~~ l ~ \ ~t ~ ~,j, ~ 1 ~~ ~ii~~ ~. i ~i~~f URBAN GROVE AVENUE AND FOOTHILL BOULEVARD RES /COM DEVELOPMENT AIR QUALITY ANALYSIS ,Upland, Calrfornta - 03731 02 dwq ossraonos 2-4 C, D, E,F,G 216 3.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS • 3.1 South Coast Air Basin The project site is located in the SCAB within the jurisdiction of SCAQMD. The SCAQMD was created by the 1977 Lewis-Presley Air Quality Management Act, which merged four county air pollution control bodies into one regional district. Under the Act, the SCAQMD is responsible for bringing air quality in areas under its jurisdiction into conformity with federal and state air quality standards. The SCAQMD has jurisdiction over an area of approximately 10,743 square miles, consisting of the four-county Basin (Orange County and the non-desert portions of Los Angeles, Riverside and San Bernardino Counties), and the Riverside County portions of the Salton Sea Air Basin and Mojave Desert Air Basin. The Basin is bound by the Pacific Ocean to the west and the San Gabriel, San Bernardino, and San Jacinto Mountains to the north and east. The Los Angeles • County portion of the Mojave Desert Air Basin is bound by the San Gabriel Mountains to the south and west, the Los Angeles/Kern County border to the north, and the Los Angeles/San Bernardino County border to the east. The Riverside County portion of the Salton Sea Air Basin is bound by the San Jacinto Mountains in the west and spans eastward up to the Palo Verde Valley. The federal nonattainment area (known as the Coachella Valley Planning Area) is a subregion of the Riverside County and Salton Sea Air Basin that is bound by the San Jacinto Mountains to the west and the eastern boundary of the Coachella Valley to the east. 3.2 Regional Climate The regional climate significantly influences the air quality in the Basin. In addition, the temperature, wind, humidity, precipitation, and amount of sunshine influence the air quality. • 3-1 C,D,E,F,G 217 The annual average temperatures throughout the Basin vary from the low to middle 60° Fahrenheit (F). Due to a decreased marine influence, the eastern portion of the Basin shows greater variability in average annual minimum and maximum temperatures. January is the coldest month throughout the Basin, with average minimum temperatures of 47°F in downtown Los Angeles and 36°F in San Bernardino. All portions of the Basin have recorded maximum temperatures above 100°F. Located 37 miles east of downtown Los Angeles, Rancho Cucamonga's planning area encompasses approximately 50 square miles. The mean annual high and low temperatures are 79°F and 53°F respectively. The overall climate is a mild Mediterranean, with temperatures reaching up to 96°F in the summer and dipping to 44°F in the winter. The total average annual precipitation is approximately 15.42 inches, and the majority of precipitation occurs between December and March (City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan, 2001). • Although the climate of the Basin can be characterized as semi-arid, the air near the land surface is quite moist on most days because of the presence of a marine layer This shallow layer of sea air is an important modifier of Basin climate. Humidity restricts visibility in the Basin, and the conversion of sulfur dioxide to sulfates is heightened in air with high relative humidity. The marine layer provides an environment for that conversion process, especially during the spring and summer months. The annual average relative humidity within the Basin is 71 percent along the coast and 59 percent inland. Since the ocean effect is dominant, periods of heavy early morning fog are frequent and low stratus clouds are a characteristic feature. It should be noted that these effects decrease with distance from the coast. More than 90 percent of the Basin's rainfall occurs from November through April. The annual average rainfall varies from approximately nine inches in Riverside to fourteen inches in downtown Los Angeles. Monthly and yearly rainfall totals are extremely variable. Summer rainfall usually consists of widely scattered • 3-2 C, D, E,F,G 218 thunderstorms near the coast and slightly heavier shower activity in the eastern portion of the Basin with frequency being higher near the coast. Due to its generally clear weather, about three-quarters of available sunshine is received in the Basin. The remaining one-quarter is absorbed by clouds. The ultraviolet portion of this abundant radiation is a key factor in photochemical reactions. On the shortest day of the year there is approximately 10 hours of possible sunshine, and on the longest day of the year there is approximately 14 1/2 hours of possible sunshine. The importance of wind to air pollution is considerable. The direction and speed of the wind determines the horizontal dispersion and transport of the air pollutants. During the late autumn to early spring rainy season, the Basin is subjected to wind flows associated with the traveling storms moving through the region from the northwest. This period also brings five to ten periods of strong, dry offshore winds, locally termed "Santa Anas" each year. During the dry season, which coincides with the months of maximum photochemical smog concentrations, the wind flow is bimodal, typified by a daytime onshore sea breeze and a nighttime offshore . drainage wind. Summer wind flows are created by the pressure differences between the relatively cold ocean and the unevenly heated and cooled land surfaces that modify the general northwesterly wind circulation over southern California. Nighttime drainage begins with the radiational cooling of the mountain slopes. Heavy, cool air descends the slopes and flows through the mountain passes and canyons as it follows the lowering terrain toward the ocean. Another characteristic wind regime in the basin is the "Catalina Eddy," a low level cyclonic (counterclockwise) flow centered over Santa Catalina Island which results in an offshore flow to the southwest. On most spring and summer days, some indication of an eddy is apparent m costal sections. In the Basin, there are two distinct temperature inversion structures that control vertical mixing of air pollution. During the summer, warm high-pressure descending (subsiding) air is undercut by a shallow layer of cool marine air. The boundary between these two layers of air is a persistent marine subsidence/inversion. This 3-3 C, D, E,F,G 219 • boundary prevents vertical mixing which effectively acts as an impervious lid to pollutants over the entire Basin. The mixing height for the inversion structure is normally situated 1,000 to 1,500 feet above mean sea level. A second inversion-type forms m conjunction with the drainage of cool air off the surrounding mountains at night followed by the seaward drift of this pool of cool air. The top of this layer forms a sharp boundary with the warmer air aloft and creates nocturnal radiation inversions. These inversions occur primarily in the winter, when nights are longer and onshore flow is weakest. They are typically only a few hundred feet above mean sea level. These inversions effectively trap pollutants, such as NOx and CO from vehicles, as the pool of cool air drifts seaward. Winter is therefore a period of high levels of primary pollutants along the coastline. 3.3 Wind Patterns and City Location The distinctive climate of the project area and the South Coast Air Basin (SCAB) is • determined by its terrain and geographical location. The Basin is located in a coastal plain with connecting broad valleys and low hills, bounded by the Pacific Ocean m the southwest quadrant with high mountains forming the remainder of the perimeter. Wind patterns across the south coastal region are characterized by westerly and southwesterly on-shore winds during the day and easterly or northeasterly breezes at night. Winds are characteristically light although the speed is somewhat greater during the dry summer months than during the rainy winter season. The prevailing winds in the project area move predominately from the Southwest to Northeast with an average wind speed of 2.06 meters per second (m/s). A Windrose exhibit is available in Appendix G of this report and shows prevailing wind patterns and average speed in the project area. Meteorological data from (City of Upland) was used to be representative of the project area. The Meteorological data was available for use by the SCAQMD on their website (http://www agmd.gov/smog/metdata/ MetDataTable1.html). 3-4 C, D, E,F,G 220 3.4 3.5 3.6 Existing Air Quality • Existing air quality is measured based upon ambient air quality standards. These standards are the levels of air quality that are considered safe, with an adequate margin of safety, to protect the public health and welfare. Those standards currently in effect for both California and federal air quality standards are shown in Table 3-1. The determination of whether a region's air quality is healthful or unhealthful is determined by comparing contaminant levels in ambient air samples to the state standards and federal standards presented in Table 3-1. The air quality in a region is considered to be in attainment if: the measured ambient air pollutant levels for 03, CO, S02 (1-hour and 24-hour), N02, and PMio are not exceeded and all other standards are not equaled or exceeded at any time in any consecutive three-year period; and the federal standards (other than 03, PMio, and those based on annual averages or arithmetic mean) are not exceeded more than once per year. The 03 standard is attained when the fourth highest eight-hour concentration in a year, averaged over three years, is equal to or less than the standard. For PM~o, the • 24-hour standard is attained when 99 percent of the daily concentrations, averaged over three years, are equal to or less than the standard. See Table 3-2 for attainment designations. Regional Air Quality The SCAQMD monitors levels of various criteria pollutants at 30 monitoring stations throughout the air district. In 2005 the federal and state standards for ozone at most monitoring locations exceeded threshold on one or more days. No areas of the Basin exceeded federal or state standards for N02, S02, CO, sulfates or lead. Local Air Ouality The closest long-term air quality monitoring site in relation to the project for 03, CO, • N02, and particulate sulfate is carried out by the South Coast Air Quality 3-5 C, D, E,F,G 221 • TABLE 3-1 AMBIENT AIR QUALITY STANDARDS' AIR POLLUTANT CALIFORNIA STANDARDS FEDERAL PRIMARY STANDARDS MOST RELEVANT EFFECTS CONCENTRATION/AVERAGING TIME CONCENTRATION/AVERAGING TIME (a) Short-term exposures (I) Pulmonary function decrements 0 09 ppm, 1-hr avg > and localized lung edema m humans and animals (2) Risk to public health implied by alterations in pulmonary morphology Ozone O ( a) 0 08 ppm, 8-hr avg > and host defense in animals, (b) Long-term exposures Risk to public health implied by altered connective tissue metabolism and altered pulmonary morphology in animals after tong-term exposures and pulmonary function decrements in chronically ~~ exposed humans, (c) Vegetation damage, (d) Property damag 0 07 ppm, 8-hr avg > 9 0 ppm, 8-hr avg > 9 0 ppm, 8-hr avg > (a) Aggravation of angina pectoris and other aspects of Carbon Monoxide coronary heart disease, (b) Decreased exercise tolerance in (CO) persons with peripheral vascular disease and lung disease, (c) Impairment of central nervous system functions, (d) Possible 20 0 ppm, 1-hr avg > 35 0 ppm, 1-hr avg > increased risk to fetuses (a) Potential to aggravate chronic respiratory disease and respiratory symptoms in sensitive groups, (b) Risk to public Nitrogen Dioxide health implied by pulmonary and extra-pulmonary biochemical (NOZ) 0 25 ppm, 1-hr avg > 0 053 ppm, ann avg > and cellular changes and pulmonary structural changes, (c) Contribution to atmospheric discoloration 0 04 ppm, 24-hr avg > 0 03 ppm, ann avg > Sulfur Dioxide (a) Bronchoconstriction accompanied by symptoms which may (SOZ) include wheezing, shortness of breath and chest tightness, during exercise or physical activity in persons with asthma 0 25 ppm, 1-hr avg > 0 14 ppm, 24-hr avg > Suspended Particulate Matter 20 pg/m3, ann geometric mean > 50 Ng/m', ann arithmetic mean > (PM10)"' 50 Ng/m3, 24-hr avgerage > 150 pg/m3, 24-hr avgerage > (a) Excess deaths for short-term exposures and exacerbation of symptoms in sensitive patients with respiratory disease, (b) Suspended ~~~ Excess seasonal declines in pulmonary function, especially in Particulate Matter 12 pg/m3, ann geometric mean > 15 pg/m', ann arithmetic mean > children, (c) Increased risk of premature death from heart or (PMZ 5)" 65 pg/m3, 24-hr avgerage > lung diseases in elderly (a) Decrease in ventilatory function, (b) Aggravation of Sulfates No Federal Standards asthmatic symptoms, (c) Aggravation of cardio-pulmonary disease, (d) Vegetation damage, (e) Degradation of visibility, 25 g/m', 24-hr av >_ f ro ert dams e Lead (a) Increased body burden, (b) Impairment of blood formation and nerve conduction 1 5 g/m3, 30-da avg _> 1 5 g/m3, calendar quarter > Extinction coefficient of 0 23 per kilometer -visibility of ten miles or more Visibility Reducing (0 07 - 30 Miles or more for Lake Tahoe) Visibility impairment on days when relative humidity is less Particles due to the particles when the relative No Federal Standards than 70 percent humidity is less than 70 percent Method Beta Attenuation and Transmittance through Filter Tape 'Source Calrfomia Air Resources Board (11/29!05) `For reader's convenience m picking out standards gwckly, concentration appears frst e g "0 12 ppm, 1-hr avg >" means thr-avg > 0 12ppm " This concentration was approved by the ARB on April 26, 2005 and is expected to become effective in early 2006 ~re is no separate 24-hour PM 2 5 standard in California however, the U S EPA promulgated a 24-hour PM 2 5 ambient air quality standard of 65 pg/m3 Foothill/Grove Mixed-Use Pro)ect City of Rancho Cucamonga, CA (JN UiUcJobsl_03600-04000\_03700\037311Excel\03731-01T3-1) 3-6 C, D, E,F,G 222 TABLE 3-2 ATTAINMENT STATUS Criteria Pollutant Federal Designation State Designation Ozone - 8 hour standard Nonattalnment -Severe 17 Nonattainment Ozone - 1 hour standard Nonattalnment -Extreme Nonattalnment Carbon Monoxide Nonattainmenta Attalnment PM10 Serious Nonattalnment Nonattalnment PM2 5 Nonattalnment Nonattalnment Nitrogen Dioxide Attalnment Attalnment Source California Air Resources Board, Attainment Designation Fact Sheets, Janruary 2006 a Scheduled for attainment in 2006, standard is currently met, redesignation request for attainment/maintainence has been submitted to the EPA U \UcJobs\_03600-04000\_03700\03731\Excel\[03731-01 XLS]T3-2 Foothill/Grove Mixed-Use Project City of Rancho Cucamonga, CA 3-7 (JN U \UcJobs\_03600-04000\_03700\03731\Excel\03731-01T3-2) • • C,D,E,F,G 223 • Management District (SCAQMD) at the Upland monitoring station located approximately 0.4 miles from the project site. Data for PM~o, and PM2 s was obtained from the Ontario monitoring station located approximately 5.8 miles from the project site. Table 3-3 shows the number of days standards were exceeded for the study area. 3.7 Regulatory Background 3.7.1 Federal Regulations The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is responsible for setting and enforcing the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for oxidants (03), CO, NOx, SO2, PM~o, and lead. The U.S. EPA has jurisdiction over emissions sources that are under the authority of the federal government including aircraft, locomotives, and emissions sources outside • state waters (Outer Continental Shelf). The U.S. EPA also establishes emission standards for vehicles sold in states other than California. Automobiles sold in California must meet the stricter emission requirements of the CARB. The Federal Clean Air Act (CAA) was first enacted in 1955 and has been amended numerous times in subsequent years (1963, 1965, 1967, 1970, 1977, and 1990). As discussed above, the CAA establishes the federal air quality standards, the NAAQS, and specifies future dates for achieving compliance. The CAA also mandates that States submit and implement State Implementation Plans (SIPs) for local areas not meeting these standards. These Plans must include pollution control measures that demonstrate how the standards will be met • 3-8 C, D, E,F,G 224 TABLE 3-3 PROJECT AREA AIR QUALITY MONITORING SUMMARY - 2000-2005 POLLUTANT /STANDARD 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 Ozone 1-Hour > 0 09 ppm (days) 43 53 36 48 31 34 8- Hour > 0 07 ppm (days) XX XX XX XX 31 34 1-Hour > 0 12 ppm (days) 10 14 5 15 2 8 8- Hour > 0 08 ppm (days) 19 33 19 35 18 15 Max 1-Hour Conc (ppm) 0 18 0 174 0 139 0 155 0 138 0 149 Carbon Monoxide 1-Hour > 20 ppm (days) 0 0 0 0 0 0 8- Hour > 9 ppm (da s) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Max 1-Hour Conc (ppm) 4 3 4 4 3 2 Max 8-Hour Conc (ppm) 2 6 1 75 1 6 2 9 2 1 1 9 Nitrogen Dioxide 1-Hour > 0 25 ppm (da s) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Max 1-Hour Conc (ppm) 0 15 0 13 0 12 0 11 0 11 0 10 Particulate Sulfate 24-Hour > 25 ug/m3 (% samples) 0 0 0 0 0 XX Max 24-Mon Conc (ug/m3) 11 5 10 7 11 5 11 8 9 2 XX Inhalable Particulates (PM-10)2 24-Hour > 50 ug/m3 (days exceeded/sampled) 26/58 27/64 25/61 18/62 17/58 21/56* 24-Hour > 150 ug/m3 (days exceeded/sampled) 0/58 1/64 0/61 0/62 0/58 0/56* Max 24-Hour Conc (ug/m3) 124 166 91 149 93 77'" Ultra-Fine Particulates (PM-2 5)2 24-Hour > 65 pg/m3(days exceeded/sampled) 2/111 2/113 0/111 3/118 2/112 2/112"` Max 24-Hour Conc (pg/m3) 73 4 71 2 64 8 88 9 86 1 87 8'` ' Data obtained from Northwest San Bernardino Monitoring Station unless otherwise noted z Data obtained from Southwest San Bernardino Monitoring Station • Draft data available from SCAQMD XX =Data not available from either SCAQMD or CARB Source South Coast AQMD (www agmd gov) U \UcJobs\_03600-04000\_03700\037311Excel\[03731-01 XLS)T3-3 • • rootnnv~rove nnixed-use Project City of Rancho Cucamonga, CA (JN U \UcJobs\_03600-04000\_03700103731\Excel\03731-01 T3-3) 3-9 C, D, E,F,G 225 • The 1990 amendments to the CAA that identify specific emission reduction goals for areas not meeting the NAAQS require a demonstration of reasonable further progress toward attainment and incorporate additional sanctions for failure to attain or to meet interim milestones. The sections of the CAA most directly applicable to the development of the project site include Title I (Nonattainment Provisions) and Title II (Mobile Source Provisions). Title I provisions were established with the goal of attaining the NAAQS for the following criteria pollutants 03, NO2, SOZ, PM~o, CO, PM25, and lead. The NAAQS were amended in July 1997 to include an additional standard for 03 and to adopt a NAAQS for PM2 5. Table 3-1 (previously presented) provides the NAAQS within the basin. Mobile source emissions are regulated in accordance with Title II provisions. These provisions require the use of cleaner burning gasoline and other • cleaner burning fuels such as methanol and natural gas. Automobile manufacturers are also required to reduce tailpipe emissions of hydrocarbons and nitrogen oxides (NOx). NOX is a collective term that includes all forms of nitrogen oxides (NO, NO2, NO3) which are emitted as byproducts of the combustion process. 3.7.2 California Regulations The CARB, which became part of the California EPA in 1991, is responsible for ensuring implementation of the California Clean Air Act (AB2595), responding to the federal CAA, and for regulating emissions from consumer products and motor vehicles. The California CAA mandates achievement of the maximum degree of emissions reductions possible from vehicular and other mobile sources in order to attain the state ambient air quality standards by the earliest practical date. The CARB established the CAAQS for all pollutants for which the federal government has NAAQS and, in addition, 3-10 C,D,E,F,G 226 establishes standards for sulfates, visibility, hydrogen sulfide, and vinyl • chloride. However at this time, hydrogen sulfide and vinyl chloride are not measured at any monitoring stations in the Basin because they are not considered to be a regional air quality problem. It should also be noted that the CAAQS are generally more stringent than the NAAQS. Local air quality management districts, such as the SCAQMD, regulate air emissions from commercial and light industrial facilities. All air pollution control districts have been formally designated as attainment or nonattainment for each CAAQS Serious non-attainment areas are required to prepare air quality management plans that include specified emission reduction strategies in an effort to meet clean air goals. These plans are required to include: • Application of Best Available Retrofit Control Technology to existing sources; • • Developing control programs for area sources (e g., architectural coatings and solvents) and indirect sources (e g. motor vehicle use generated by residential and commercial development); • A District permitting systems designed to allow no net increase in emissions from any new or modified permitted sources of emissions; • Implementing reasonably available transportation control measures and assuring a substantial reduction in growth rate of vehicle trips and miles traveled; • Significant use of low emissions vehicles by fleet operators; • 3-11 C, D, E,F,G 227 • Sufficient control strategies to achieve a five percent or more annual reduction in emissions or 15 percent or more in a period of three years for ROCs, NOX, CO and PM~o. However, air basins may use alternative emission reduction strategy which achieves a reduction of less than five percent per year under certain circumstances. .~ • 3-12 C, D,E,F,G 228 4.0 PROJECT AIR QUALITY IMPACT 4.1 Introduction The proposed project has the potential to violate an air quality standard or contribute to an existing air quality violation. Additionally, the proposed project may result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of a criteria pollutant for emissions of PM~o, and 03 for which the project area is non-attainment under the applicable Federal or State ambient air quality standard (2003 AQMP). The significance of these potential impacts is described below. 4.2 Project Description The site is proposed to be developed with 14,000 square feet of general office, 23 single-family dwelling units, and 75 condominium dwelling units. • 4.3 Site Location The proposed project is located at the northeast corner of the Foothill Boulevard and Grove Avenue intersection in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 4.4 Standards of Significance The SCAQMD has developed significance thresholds based on the volume of each pollutant emitted. The SCAQMD's CEQA Air Quality Handbook, 1993 states that any projects in the District with daily emissions that exceed any of the following thresholds should be considered as having an individually and cumulatively significant air quality impact. See Table 4-1 below for a summary or daily emissions threshold set froth by the SQAMD: 4-1 C, D, E,F,G 229 • TABLE 4-1 MAX DAILY EMISSIONS THRESHOLDS Pollutant Construction Operational NOX 100 Ibs/da 55 Ibs/da VOC 75 Ibs/da 55 Ibs/da PM,o 150 Ibs/da 150 Ibs/da SOX 150 Ibs/day 150 Ibs/day CO 550 Ibs/day 550 Ibs/day AMBIENT AIR QUALITY FOR CRITERIA POLL UTANTS CO 1-hour average 8-hour average 20 0 ppm 9 0 ppm Per SCAQMD guidelines, during construction activity if a daily emission threshold is exceeded regardless of quarterly emissions levels, the project is determined to have a significant air quality impact Therefore, a conservative approach is to evaluate construction emissions based on daily emissions rather than quarterly emissions. This analysis uses the more conservative approach to construction emissions, and analyzes construction emissions on a daily basis. Additional indicators of potentially significant air quality impacts are listed in the CEQA Air Quality Handbook that should be used as screening criteria to evaluate the need for further analysis with respect to air quality. Whenever possible, the project should be evaluated in a quantitative analysis; otherwise a qualitative analysis is appropriate. The additional indicators are as follows: • Project could interfere with the attainment of the federal or State ambient air quality standards by either violating or contributing to an existing or projected air quality vlolation, • Project could result in population increases within the regional statistical area which would be in excess of that projected in the AQMP, • Project could generate vehicle trips that cause a CO hotspot, • Project might have the potential to create or be subjected to objectionable odors; • Project could have hazardous materials on site and could result in an accidental release of alr toxic emissions; 4-2 C, D, E,F,G 230 • Project could emit an air toxic contaminant regulated by District rules or that is on a federal or State air toxic list; • • Project could involve disposal of hazardous waste; • Project could be occupied by sensitive receptors near a facility that emits air toxics or near CO hotspots; • Project could emit carcinogenic air contaminants that could pose a cancer risk. The potential for the project to generate a CO "hotspot" (a detailed CO hotspot analysis is included later m this report) and the potential for the project to be subjected to objectionable odors (a detailed discussion is presented later in this report), the other above mentioned screening criteria were not met for the project. Potential impact significance thus relates mainly to SCAQMD's CEQA Air Quality Handbook, 1993 numerical emissions thresholds identified previously, and Localized Significance thresholds (LSTs) discussed below. LSTs were developed in response to the Governing Board's Environmental Justice Enhancement Initiative I-4. The LST methodology was provisionally adopted by the Governing Board in October 2003. LSTs are only applicable to the following criteria pollutants: NOX, CO, and PM~o. LSTs represent the maximum emissions from a project that are not expected to cause or contribute to an exceedance of the most stringent applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard, and are developed based on the ambient concentrations of that pollutant for each source receptor area and distance to the nearest sensitive receptor. For PM~o LSTs were derived based on requirements in SCAQMD Rule 403 -Fugitive Dust. The use of LSTs is voluntary, to be implemented at the discretion of local public agencies acting as a lead agency pursuant to the California Environmental 4-3 C, D, E,F,G 231 • Quality Act (CEQA). LSTs would only apply to projects that must undergo an environmental analysis pursuant to CEQA or the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and are flue acres or less. It is recommended that proposed projects larger than five acres in area undergo air dispersion modeling to determine localized air quality. Projects that are statutorily or categorically exempt under CEQA would not be subject to LST analyses. Projects exempt from CEQA also include infill projects that meet the H&S Code provisions or projects Identified by lead agencies as ministerial. Emissions of NOx, CO, and PM~o are below the significance thresholds outlined in the mass rate look-up tables (after mitigation). Therefore additional analysis is not required. It is assumed that, although this project is substantially greater than 5 acres, there are no impacts form emissions of NOx, CO, and PM~o since the project does not exceed thresholds for a small 5 acre project for both construction and operational activity after mitigation. See Table 4-2 below for a • summary of localized significance thresholds for the project area: TABLE 4-2 LOCALIZED SIGNIFICANCE THRESHOLDS (Allowable emissions (Ibs/day) as a function of receptor distance (50 meters) from site boundary) Pollutant ConstructionlOperational NOx 438 IbS/day CO 1,748 Ibs/da PM~o 49 Ibs/day / 13 Ibs/day 4.5 Project-Related Sources of Potential Impact Land uses such as those proposed for the project impact air quality predominately through emissions associated with vehicular travel Trip generation rates and characteristics were calculated based on the report, Proposed Foothill/Grove Mixed-Use Project CMP TIA Peak Hour Trip Generation Analysis (RBF Consulting, Inc ). • 4-4 C, D, E,F,G 232 The CARB has developed a land use and air pollution emissions computer model (URBEMIS 2002) that is used to calculate the daily emissions increase • associated with a proposed project. For project related emissions the URBEMIS 2002 v. 8.7.0 model was used to forecast emissions levels for both project construction and operational activities. Output from the model runs for both construction and operational scenarios are provided in Appendix "A" and "B", respectively. 4.6 Construction Emissions Construction activities associated with the proposed project will result in emissions of CO, VOCs, NOX, SOX, and PM~o. Construction related emissions are expected from the following construction equipment and construction activities: • Demolition • Rough Grading • Paving • • Building Construction • Architectural Coatings • Construction Workers Commuting Based on discussion with the project team, it is assumed for purposes of this analysis that construction activity is estimated to begin in August 2007 and is to be completed by December 2008. 4 6.1 Demolition In addition to standard heavy equipment necessary for construction and grading activity of the proposed project, there will be demolition and removal of three existing homes and a small wooden building. Based on discussion with the project team a "worst-case" scenario encompassing an approximate two week period of demolition activity was analyzed. It is estimated that the project will utilize approximately one concrete/industrial saw, one rubber 4-5 C, D, E,F,G 233 tired dozer, and any combination of two of the following: tractors, loaders, backhoes. Equipment used is assumed to be operational for eight hours per day, which in most cases likely overestimates the actual operations and related emissions. It is assumed for purposes of this analysis that haul truck emissions that will be used to remove waste will result from approximately 5 truck trips per day. See Appendix A for a more detailed calculation. 4.6.2 Rough Grading Exhaust emissions from rough grading activity result from both on-road and off-road heavy equipment operating during this activity. For purposes of this analysis, it is assumed that the project will utilize approximately three rubber tired dozers, two water trucks, and any combination of three of the following: tractors, loaders, backhoes during grading activities. The equipment used is assumed to be operational for eight hours per day, which in most cases • likely overestimates the actual operations and related emissions. Dust is normally a mayor concern during rough grading activities. Because such emissions are not amenable to collection and discharge through a controlled source, they are called "fugitive emissions". Emissions rates vary as a function of many parameters (soil silt, soil moisture, wind speed, area disturbed, number of vehicles, depth of disturbance or excavation, etc ) PM~o emissions were calculated by assuming that, at a worst case 5 acres of the approximate 10 acres disturbed would be actively graded at any one time. Grading activity is estimated to take place over one month. Fugitive dust emission rates for average conditions (0.11 ton/acre-month) were available from the report Improvement of Specific Emission Factors (Midwest Research Institute, 1996) were utilized for this analysis. • C, D, E,F,G 4 234 In addition to fine particles that remain suspended in the atmosphere semi- indefinitely, construction (grading) activities generate many larger particles with shorter atmospheric residence times. This dust is comprised mainly of large diameter inert silicates that are chemically non-reactive and are further readily filtered out by human breathing passages. These fugitive dust particles are therefore more of a potential soiling nuisance as they settle out on parked cars, outdoor furniture, or landscape foliage rather than any adverse health hazard. Any nuisance potential will tend to be highly localized when a development is built in very close proximity to an already completed development. Emissions generated from grading activity are presented in Table 4-3 (presented later in this report). 4.6.3 Pavin Paving activities include the movement of any remaining material as well as necessary curb and gutter work, road base material placement and blacktop. • A project this size is anticipated to utilize approximately one grader, one paver, and one roller during paving activities. Emissions generated from paving activity are presented in Table 4-3 (presented later in this report). 4.6.4 Building Construction Building construction activity will result in emissions from heavy equipment that will be operational during building construction. The types of activities that generally take place may include physical building construction, general trench-work, pipe laying with associated base material and cover, ancillary earthwork, manholes, etc. Construction equipment will likely include: one crane, three forklifts, and any combination of three of the following: tractors, loaders, backhoes during building construction activities. • 4-7 C, D, E,F,G 235 4.6 5 Architectural Coatings The application of architectural surface coatings (painting) generates VOC emissions when organic solvents in the coating evaporate as the coating dries. The following equation was used to estimate VOC emissions from architectural coatings: Emissions (Ib/day) = C x V where• C = VOC content of coating (Iblgal) V =Amount of coating applied (gal/day) A VOC content of 2.08 Ib/gal (250 g/I) was assumed (typical water-based paint), based on the VOC limit specified in SCAQMD Rule 1113. It should be noted that Rule 1113 specifies a limit of 0.84 Ib/gal (100 g/I) for coatings (flats). However, Rule 1113 allows a coating that is manufactured prior to the effective date of the applicable limit specified in the Table of Standards, and that has a VOC content above that limit , to be sold, supplied, offered for sale, or applied for up to three years after the specified effective date. Therefore, it was conservatively assumed that the coatings used for construction of the proposed project would meet the VOC-content limit currently in effect Emissions estimates have been calculated for architectural coatings assuming 80 gallons of paint per day were utilized; worker trips during architectural coatings have also been included m calculations and are available m Appendix A. C, D, E,F,G 4 236 4.6.6 Construction Workers Commuting • Construction emissions for construction worker vehicles traveling to and from the project site were estimated assuming the maximum projected workers at each location traveling to and from the site each weekday. URBEMIS 2002 default values were used; see Appendix A for more details. 4.6.7 Construction Emission Summary Assuming a "worst case" scenario of equipment was operated on average for 8 hours per day, along with other assumptions for construction activity (previously mentioned); the estimated maximum daily construction emissions are summarized on Table 4-3. Under the assumed worst case conditions, the project will result in emissions that would exceed criteria pollutant thresholds established by the SCAQMD for emissions of VOCs, NOX, and PM~o. Section 5.0 provides emissions reduction measures to reduce impacts to less than significant levels. • 4.7 Operational Emissions Impacts Operational activities associated with the proposed project will result in emissions of ROG, NOx, CO, PM~o, and SOx. Operational emissions would be expected from the following equipment and activities • Vehicle emissions • Fugitive dust related to vehicle travel • Combustion emissions associated with natural gas use • Landscape maintenance equipment emissions • Emissions from consumer products • Architectural coatings • 4-9 C, D, E,F,G 237 ., TABLE 4-3 EMISSIONS SUMMARY OF PEAK CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES (POUNDS PER DAY) • Construction Activities VOC NOX CO SOX PM~o Demolition 6 09 51 25 50 31 0 2 15 Site Preparation / Grading~~ 13 01 101 34 100 37 0 54 45 Building Construction 6 01 36 47 50 5 0 1 25 Architectural Coatings 168 02 3 65 34 88 0 02 0 08 Paving 4 33 24 96 34 46 0 0 85 Peak Day Emissions 168.02 101.34 100.37 0.02 54.45 SCAQMD Regional Threshold 75 100 550 150 150 SCAQMD Localized Significance Threshold XX 438 1,748 XX 49 Significant? YES YES NO NO YES Includes emissions from haul trucks ~~Inciudes emissions from two water trucks Source URBEMIS 2002 v 8 7 0 &SCAQMD LST 5-acre Example XX Not Applicable U 1UcJobs\_03600-04000\_03700\03731\Excel\[03731-01 XLS]T4-3 Foothill/Grove Mixed-Use Project City of Rancho Cucamonga, CA (JN U \UcJobs\_03600-04000\_03700\03731\Excel\03731-01 T4-3) 4'~ C, D, E,F,G 238 4 7 1 Vehicle Emissions Project operational (vehicular) impacts are dependent on both overall daily vehicle tnp generation and the effect of the project on peak hour traffic operations in the vicinity of the project. The project related operational air quality impact centers on the 953 new vehicle trips generated by the project. Trip characteristics were calculated by URBEMIS 2002 and were based on the report, Proposed Foothill/Grove Mixed-Use Project CMP TIA Peak Hour Trip Generation Analysis (RBF Consulting, Inc.). Overall project daily emissions are evaluated first, followed by analysis of the potential peak hour "micro-scale" air quality impacts of the project (i.e. CO hotspot analysis). 4.7.2 Fugitive Dust Related to Vehicle Travel • Vehicles traveling on paved roads would be a source of fugitive emissions due to the generation of road dust. The emissions estimates for travel on • paved roads used assumptions from the URBEMISIS 2002 model. The estimated PM~o emissions from vehicles for fugitive dust are provided in Appendix B. 4.7.3 Combustion Emissions Associated with Natural Gas Use Combustion emissions would be generated by the use of natural gas in the development. The emissions associated with natural gas use were calculated based on assumptions from the URBEMIS 2002 model. The estimated combustion emissions are provided in Table 4-4 (presented later in this report. Detailed emission calculations are provided in Appendix B) • 4-11 C, D, E,F,G 239 4.7.4 Landscape Maintenance Emissions • Landscape maintenance equipment would generate emissions from fuel combustion and evaporation of unburned fuel Equipment in this category would include lawnmowers, trailers, shedders/grinders, blowers, trimmers, chain saws, and hedge trimmers used to maintain the landscaping of the development. The emissions associated with landscape maintenance equipment were calculated based on assumptions provided in the URBEMIS 2002 model. Detailed emissions calculations are provided in Appendix B. 4.7.5 Emissions from Consumer Products Consumer products include, but are not limited to detergents, cleaning compounds, polishes, personal care products, and lawn and garden products. Many of these products contain organic compounds which when released in the atmosphere can react to form ozone and other photochemically reactive pollutants. 4.7.6 Architectural Coatings It is assumed that over a period of time the buildings that are part of this project will be subject to emissions resulting from the evaporation of solvents contained in paints, varnishes, primers, and other surface coatings as part of project maintenance. It is conservatively estimated that approximately five percent of the buildings built as part of this project will be repainted per year. 4.7.7 Operations Emissions Summary The project-related operations emissions burdens, along with a comparison of SCAQMD recommended significance thresholds, are shown in Table 4-4 The project related emissions levels for operational emissions will not • exceed the thresholds set forth by the SCAQMD. 4-12 C,D,E,F,G 240 TABLE 4-4 SUMMARY OF PEAK OPERATIONAL EMISSIONS (SUMMER) • (POUNDS PER DAY) Operational Activities VOC NOx CO SOx PM,o Vehicle Emissions 8 74 9 39 101 76 0 07 9 89 Natural Gas Use 0 12 1 52 0 68 0 0 Landscape Maintenance Emissions 0 31 0 01 2 15 0 01 0 01 Consumer Products 4 79 0 0 0 0 Architectural Coatings 2 19 0 0 0 0 Total Operational Emissions 52.31 31 90 288 67 0.27 23.69 SCAQMD Regional Threshold 55 55 550 150 150 SCAQMD Localized Significance Threshold XX 438 1,748 XX 13 Significant? NO NO NO NO NO Source URBEMIS 2002 v 8 7 0 SUMMARY OF PEAK OPERATIONAL EMISSIONS (WINTER) (POUNDS PER DAY) Operational Activities VOC NOx CO SOx PM,o Vehicle Emissions 7 91 13 59 95 87 0 05 9 89 Natural Gas Use 0 12 1 52 0 68 0 0 Fireplace 0 04 0 61 0 26 0 0 05 Consumer Products 4 79 0 0 0 0 Architectural Coatings 2 19 0 0 0 0 Total Operational Emissions 49.29 45.57 265.30 0.19 23.88 SCAQMD Regional Threshold 55 55 550 150 150 SCAQMD Localized Significance Threshold XX 438 1,748 XX 13 Significant? NO NO NO NO NO Source URBEMIS 2002 v 8 7 0 XX Not Applicable ' Thresholds reflect SCAQMD regional emissions thresholds Foothill/Grove Mixed-Use Project City of Rancho Cucamonga, CA 4-13 (JN U \UcJobs\_03600-04000\_03700\037311Excei\03731-01 T4-4) • C, D, E,F,G 241 4 8 Air Quality Management Planning The project site is located within the SCAB, which is characterized by relatively poor air quality. The SCAQMD has jurisdiction over an approximately 12,000 square- mile area consisting of the four-county Basin and the Los Angeles County and Riverside County portions of what use to be referred to as the Southeast Desert Air Basin. State and Federal air quality standards are exceeded in most parts of the Basin. The SCAQMD has adopted a series of Air Quality Management Plans (AQMPs) to meet the State and Federal ambient air quality standards. The most recent version of the AQMP was adopted by the SCAQMD in August of 2003, the ARB (Air Resources Board) subsequently adopted the plan in October of 2003 and submitted its recommended modifications to the EPA for approval. The AQMP contains a number of land use and transportation control measures (TCMs) which are divided into three categories: • High occupancy vehicle (HOV) measures • Transit and Systems Management measures • Information-based measures These measures can not be implemented by any single development, but require an integration of all development and all transportation planning. AQMP consistency on a single development basis is thus more a matter of facilitating or providing the infrastructure for TCM emplementat~on rather than being required to carry out regionally comprehensive AQMP measures. The project relates to the air quality planning process through the growth forecasts that were used as inputs into the regional transportation model. If a proposed development is consistent with those growth forecasts, and if all available emissions reduction strategies are implemented as effectively as possible on a project-specific basis, then the project is consistent with the AQMP. Although the project proposes a zoning change for a portion of the project from Residential to Mixed-Use, the proposed project will not result in a substantial number of new 4-14 C,D,E,F,G 242 vehicle trips. The proposed project will result in approximately only a total of 953 new daily trips; and since the overall majority of the project is consistent with zoning i assumed for the project area, the project is assumed to be consistent with growth projections assumed in the AQMP since the proposed project will be within the scope of density for the previously zoned land use. This project however must comply with applicable SCAQMD requirements and control measures for new developments. It must also comply with prohibitory rules, such as Rule 401 and 403, for the control of fugitive dust. By meeting these requirements, the project will be consistent with growth projections assumed in the emissions inventories for both the applicable 1997 AQMP and the 2003 AQMP (pending full approval) and will also be consistent with the goals and objectives of the AQMP. 4.9 Secondary Effects Evaluation The potential impact of the project on sensitive receptors has also been considered. Sensitive receptors can include uses such as long-term health care facilities, rehabilitation centers, and retirement homes. Residences, schools, playgrounds, child care centers, and athletic facilities can also be considered as sensitive • receptors. The potential sensitive receptors include the residential components of the project site; and adjacent residential uses located in the project vicinity. As previously stated, the emissions associated with long-term operations are expected to be less than significant. Sensitive receptors located near the project site have the potential to be affected during short-term construction activity due to odors and/or dust generated during construction activities. However, the effects would be more a nuisance (e.g. possible "track out" on adjacent roadway, and short-term odors from VOCs) than a health risk as the emissions generated are below the districts thresholds and are short-term in duration In addition these potential impacts can be reduced substantially with proper compliance with SCAQMD Rule 401 and 403 and additional emissions reduction measures discussed later in this report • 4-15 C, D, E,F,G 243 • The potential for the project to generate objectionable odors has also been considered. Land uses generally associated with odor complaints include: • Agricultural uses (livestock and farming) • Wastewater treatment plants • Food processing plants • Chemical plants • Composting operations • Refineries • Landfills • Dairies • Fiberglass molding facilities The project does not contain land uses typically associated with emitting objectionable odors Lastly, any odor impact generated during construction activities would be short-term in nature and cease upon completion of the respective phase (paving or building construction) of the project. As a result, no significant odor impacts are expected to affect surrounding sensitive receptors. 4.10 CO Hotspot Analysis Air pollutant emissions related to project traffic have the potential to create new, or worsen existing, localized air quality A CO impact analysis is required to assess the localized CO impacts on sensitive receptors that are situated adjacent to congested roadways and intersections. Intersections with the highest potential for CO hot spot formation were selected for analysis based on their average delay, high project-related traffic volumes, and the proximity of intersections to sensitive receptors Intersections functioning near or above capacity, which are characterized by a high average delay, have the potential to create a CO hot spot. 4-16 C,D,E,F,G 244 The SCAQMD recommends the use of CALINE-4, a dispersion model for predicting CO concentrations, as the preferred method of estimating localized • pollutant concentrations at sensitive receptors near congested roadways and intersections. For each intersection analyzed, CALINE-4 adds roadway-specific CO emissions calculated from peak-hour turning volumes to ambient CO air concentrations. For this analysis, localized CO concentrations were calculated based on a simplified CALINE-4 screening procedure developed by the Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD) and accepted by the SCAQMD. The simplified procedure is intended as a screening analysis, which identifies a potential CO hotspot. This methodology assumes worst-case conditions and provides a screening of maximum, worst-case CO concentrations. The emissions factors used in this analysis have been updated using EMFAC2002, as the emissions originally for use with the simplified CALINE-4 screening procedure are outdated. Traffic volumes for the A M and P.M. peak hours were input into the simplified screening procedure to evaluate potential project impacts. These volumes were available by taking traffic counts at the intersection of Grove Avenue and Foothill Boulevard and adding ambient growth of 4% to be representative of year 2008 conditions, count data and emissions factors used as inputs for the CO analysis are presented in Appendix F Future CO concentrations ~~~ere determined for the weekday peak time periods by adding the predicted increase in CO concentrations attributable to traffic- volumes in the study area to an ambient CO concentration within the study area. According to 2005 air quality data (see Table 3-3 presented previously), the background 1 hour CO level for the study area is 2.0 parts per million (ppm). 1-hour and 8-hour CO concentrations were calculated using methodology outlined in the BAAQMD's simplified CALINE-4 screening procedure. The results of these calculations are presented in Table 4-5 for representative receptor • 4-17 C, D, E,F,G 245 • • r~ W J m N J W F- J U ~ W ~ ~ a O ~ a 0 O ~ W Q 0 C~ 0 c Z Q W ~ Z Z O m ~' Q U ~ ~ = N 00 d Y d ~ LL N (h d e,~ °o ~ ~a A a °' N Q ~ N 2 rn ao Y W u°', a °P c o ~ ~ o v~ a ~ Y d ~ a ~, N ~ a ~ ~ r' a c 0 ~ ~ 0 C = ~ ~ °° 0 O '~ U °~ 10 ~i d "' N Cr' V N a Y 10 d r d M Q 7 O 2 u~ ao y s ~ R ~° a "' w ~ a R a °' ~ ~ Q W N Q a c ~ 0 m a v ~ N m a c C ~ Z (6 0] z N 4-18 a C O E `m r ma C m c N N N 7 m Q 0 M n M _O d U X W rni O M 0 o U o 0 0 a ~~ N C O ~ O E °o v ~ ~ ~U~i o '^ ~ U O C l0 ~ ~ ~ O ~ O L' Z tL U C,D,E,F,G 246 locations at roadway edge, 25, 50, and 100 feet from each roadway. The national 1-hour ambient air quality standard is 35.0 ppm and the State 1-hour • ambient air quality standard is 20.0 ppm. The 8-hour national and state ambient air quality standard is 9.0 ppm. Based on this analysis the intersection reviewed is not expected to experience CO levels in excess of the allowable concentration of 20.0 ppm. The highest one-hour CO "hot spot" level is 6.5 ppm. The analysis also indicates that none of the locations experience CO levels in excess of the 8-hour allowable concentration of 9.0 ppm. Appendix C contains a more detailed output from the simplified CALINE-4 screening procedure. Since currently there are no significant impacts at the intersection with the highest potential for CO hotspot formation, no significant impacts are anticipated to occur at any other locations in the project vicinity as a result of the proposed project. Consequently, sensitive receptors would not be significantly affected by CO emissions generated by project-related traffic • 4-19 C, D, E,F,G 247 • • • THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 4-20 C,D,E,F,G 248 5.0 RECOMMENDATIONS • 5.1 Standard Regulatory Requirements During grading and construction activities, the applicant/builder shall comply with the requirements of SCAQMD Rule 401 and 403, such as water disturbed surfaces three times per day, and reduce vehicle speeds to less than 15 mph on unpaved roads (See Appendix D for a detailed list of Rule 401 and 403). Additional Recommended Measures to Reduce Impacts: • Use of construction equipment with low emission factors and high energy efficiency where possible. • Perform regularly scheduled engine maintenance to minimize equipment emissions. • Time and Tune Engines and Reduce Idle Time for Equipment during grading and construction activity . • Where feasible apply lean-NOx catalyst for off-road construction equipment. The following recommendations will help reduce construction related emissions of VOCs: • Use of Zero-VOC paints (assumes no more than 100 gram/liter of VOC) Appendix E contains a list of Zero-VOC architectural coatings manufacturers. 5.2 Level of Significance The project will not result in a significant impact (based on regional emissions threshold and LSTs) for short-term construction activity after the implementation of • 5-1 C, D, E,F,G 249 recommended emissions reduction. Emissions estimates for construction related • activity after the implementation of emissions reduction measures are shown in Table 5-1. Long-term operational impacts are below significant levels as they relate to both regional emissions thresholds and LSTs (See section 4.4 for a detailed discussion of LST methodology). The proposed project does not conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality management plan. The project is not expected to create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people. Lastly, the project generated traffic does not contribute to or create a local CO hotspot. 5-2 C,D,E,F,G 250 TABLE 5-1 EMISSIONS SUMMARY OF PEAK CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES (POUNDS PER DAY) (MITIGATED) Construction Activities VOC NOX CO SOX PM,o Demolition 5 79 48 95 48 08 0 2 05 Site Preparation / Grading~~ 12 36 77 68 95 59 0 13 83 Building Construction 5 72 27 75 48 14 0 1 24 Architectural Coatings 68 18 3 65 34 88 0 02 0 OS Paving 4 13 23 76 32 76 0 0 81 Peak Day Emissions 68.18 77.68 95.59 0.02 13.83 SCAQMD Regional Threshold 75 100 550 150 150 SCAQMD Localized Significance Threshold XX 438 1,748 XX 49 Significant? NO NO NO NO NO Includes emissions from haul trucks ~~Includes emissions from two water trucks Source URBEMIS 2002 v 8 7 0 &SCAQMD LST 5-acre Example XX Not Applicable Foothill/Grove Mixed-Use Project City of Rancho Cucamonga, CA cJ-3 (JN U \UcJobs\_03600-04000\_03700\03731\Excei\03731-01 T5-1) • • • C, D, E,F,G 251 • • THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 5-4 C,D,E,F,G 252 • • • APPEI~QIX A URBEMIS COMPUTER MODEL OUTPUT- CONSTRUCTION IMPACT ANALYSIS C, D, E,F,G 253 age 1 5/09/2006 9 29 AM URBEMIS 2002 For Windows B 7 0 i1e Name U \UCJobs\_03600-04000\_03700\03731\Urbemis\Construction urb ro~ect Name Grove Avenue and Foothill Blvd Residential Construction roject Location South Coast Air Basin (Los Angeles area) n-P.oad Motor Vehicle Emissions Based on EMFAC2002 version 2 2 SUMMARY REPORT (Pounds/Day - Summer) ONSTRUCTION EMISSION ESTIMATES PM10 PM10 *** 2007 *** ROG NOx CO S02 TOTAL EXHAUST TOTALS (lbs/day,unmitigated) 13 O1 98 72 98 36 0 00 54 40 4 39 TOTALS (lbs/day, mitigated) 12 36 75 06 93 58 0 00 13 78 4 17 *** 2008 *** ROG NOx CO TOTALS (1bs/day unmitigated) 6 O1 36 47 50 50 TOTALS (lbs/day, mitigated) 5 72 27 75 48 14 PM10 S02 TOTAL 0 00 1.31 0 00 1 24 PM10 EXHAUST 1 26 1 19 PM10 DUST so of 9 61 PM10 DUST 0 OS 0 OS • • A-3 C,D,E,F,G 254 gage 2 X5/09/2006 9 29 AM URBEMIS 2002 For Windows 8 7 0 Fi ame U \UcJobs\_03600-04000\_03700\03731\Urbemis\Construction urb P Name Grove Avenue and Foothill Blvd Residential Construction P Location South Coast Air Basin (Los Angeles area) ~n-Road Motor Vehicle Emissions Based on EMFAC2002 version 2 2 SUMNARY REPORT (Pounds/Day - Winter) CONSTRUCTION EMISSION ESTIMATES PM10 PM10 *** 2007 *** ROG NOx CO S02 TOTAL EXHAUST TOTALS (lbs/day unmitigated) 13 O1 98 72 98 36 0 00 54 40 4 39 TOTALS (lbs/day, mitigated) 12 36 75 06 93 58 0 00 13 78 4 17 *** 2008 *** TOTALS (lbs/day unmitigated) TOTALS (lbs/day, mitigated) • • ROG NOx CO 6 O1 36 47 50 50 5 72 27 75 48 14 A-4 PM10 PM10 S02 TOTAL EXHAUST 0 00 1 31 1 26 0.00 1 24 1.19 PM10 DUST 50 O1 9 61 PM10 DUST 0 OS 0 OS C,D,E,F,G 255 age 3 5/09/2006 9 29 AM URBEMIS 2002 For Windows B 7 0 Ile Name U \UcJobs\_ 03600 -04000\_03700\0 3731\Urbem is\ Construction urb ro~ect Name Grove Avenu e and Foothill Blvd Residential Construction ro~ect Location South Coast Air Basin (Los Ange les area) n-Road Motor Vehicle Emissions Based on EM FAC20 02 version 2 2 DETAIL REPORT (Pounds/Day - Winter) onstruction Start Month and Year August, 2007 onstruction Duration 16 otal Land Use Area to be Developed 10 acr es aximum Acreage Disturbed Per Day 5 acres Ingle Family Units 23 Multi-Family Units 75 etail/Office/Institutional/Industrial Squa re Fo otage 14000 ONSTRUCTION EMISSION ESTIMATES UNMITIGATED (lbs /day) PM10 PM10 PM10 Source ROG NOx CO SO2 TOTAL EXHAUST DUST *** 2007*«* nase 1 - Demolition Emissions Sgitive Dust - - - - 0 00 - 0 00 ff-Road Diesel 6 03 46 04 44 66 - 2 OS 2 OS 0 00 n-Road Diesel 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 orker Trips 0 06 0 D9 1 72 0 00 0 O1 0 00 0 O1 Maximum lbs/day 6 09 46 13 46 38 D 00 2 06 2 OS 0 O1 hase 2 - Site Grading Emissions ugitive Dust - - - - 50 00 - 50 00 ff-Road Diesel 12 92 98 58 95 61 - 4 39 4 39 0 00 n-Road Diesel 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 orker Trips 0 09 0 14 2. 75 0 00 0 O1 0 00 0 O1 Maximum lbs/day 13 O1 96 72 96 36 0 00 54 40 4 39 50 O1 hase 3 - Building Construction ldg Const Off-Road Diesel 5 74 37 53 46 67 - 1 41 1 41 0 00 ldg Const worker Trips 0 29 0 17 3 55 D 00 0 OS 0 00 0 OS rch Coatings Off-Gas 0 00 - - - - - - rch Coatings Worker Trips D 00 0 00 0. 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 sphalt Off-Gas 0 26 - - - - - - sphalt Off-P.oad Diesel 4 00 24 09 33 99 - 0 83 0 63 0 00 sphalt On-Road Diesel 0 OS 0 86 0 20 0 00 0 02 0 02 0 00 sphalt Worker Traps 0 02 0 O1 0 27 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 Maximum lbs/day 6 03 37 70 50 22 0 00 1 46 1 41 0 O5 Max lbs/day all phases 13 O1 96 72 98 36 0 00 54 40 4. 39 50 O1 *** 2008*** hase 1 - Demolition Emissions ugitive Dust - - - - 0 00 - 0 00 ff-Road Diesel 0 00 0 00 0 00 - 0 00 0 00 0 00 n-Road Diesel 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 orker Trips 0 Oo 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 Maximum lbs/day 0 DO 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 nase 2 - Site ~,.ad~ng Em~s~~oas ugitive Dust - - - - 0 00 - 0 00 ff-Road Diesel 0 00 0 00 0 00 - 0 00 0 00 0 00 n-Road Diesel 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 orker Trips 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 Maximum lbs/day 0 00 0 OD 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 hase 3 - Building Construction idg Const Off-Road Diesel 5 74 36 31 47 19 - 1 25 1 25 0 00 ldg Const WorY.er Trips 0 27 0 16 3 31 0 00 0 OS 0 00 0 OS rch Coatings Off-Gas 0 DO - - - - - - rch Coatings Worker Trips 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 D 00 0 DO sphalt Off-Gas 0 00 - - - - - - sphalt Off-Road Diesel 0 00 0 00 0 00 - 0 00 0 00 0 00 sphalt On-Road Diesel 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 sphalt worker Trips 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 Maximum 1bs/day 6 O1 36 47 50 50 0 00 1 31 1 26 0 OS Max lbs/day all phases 6 O1 36 47 50 50 0 00 1 31 1 26 0 OS A-5 C,D,E,F,G 256 Fage 4 05/09/2006 9 29 AM Phase 1 - Demolition Assumptions Start Month/Year for Phase 1 Aug '07 Ph 1 Duration 0 45 months B g Volume Total (cubic feet) 0 B ng Volume Daily (cubic feet) 0 Miles per round trip set to zero Off-Road Equipment No. Type Horsepower Load Factor Hours/Day 1 Concrete/Industrial saws 84 0 730 8 0 1 Rubber Tired Dozers 352 0 590 B 0 2 Tractor/Loaders/Backhoes 79 0 465 6 0 Phase 2 - Site Grading Assumptions Start Month/Year for Phase 2 Aug '07 Phase 2 Duration 1 months On-Road Truck Travel (VMT) 0 Off-Road Equipment No Type Horsepower Load Factor Hours/Day 3 Rubber Tired Dozers 352 0 590 B 0 3 Tractor/Loaders/Backhoes 79 0,465 B 0 Phase 3 - Building Construction Assumptions Start Month/Year for Phase 3 Sep '07 Phase 3 Duration 14 55 months Start Month/Year for SubPhase Building Oct '07 SubPhase Building Duration 13 95 months Off-Road Equipment No Type Horsepower 1 Cranes 190 3 Rough Terrain Forklifts 94 3 Tractor/Loaders/Backhoes 79 SubPhase Architectural Coatings Turned OFF Start Month/Year for SubPhase Asphalt Sep '07 SubPhase Asphalt Duration 1 months Acres to be Paved 2 2 Off-Road Equipment No Type Horsepower 1 Graders 174 1 Pavers 132 Rollers 114 CON RUCTION EMISSION ESTIMATES M ITIGATED ( lbs da ) / Y Source ROG NOx *** 2007*** Phase 1 - Demolition Emissions Fugitive Dust - - Off-Road Diesel 5 73 43 74 On-Road Diesel 0 00 0 00 Worker Trips 0 06 0 09 Maximum lbs/day 5 79 43 83 Phase 2 - Site Grading Emission s Fugitive Dust - - Off-Road Diesel 12 27 74 92 On-Road Diesel 0 00 0 00 Worker Trips U 09 0 14 Maximum lbs/day 12 36 75 06 Phase 3 - Building Construction Bldg Const Off-Road Diesel 5 45 28 52 Bldg Const Worker Trips 0 29 0 17 Arch Coatings Off-Gas 0 00 - Arch Coatings Worker Trips 0 00 0 00 Asphalt Off-Gas 0 26 - Asphalt Off-Road Diesel 3 60 22 89 Asphalt On-Road Diesel 0 OS 0 86 Asphalt Worker Trips 0 02 0 O1 Maximum lbs/day 5 75 28 69 Max lbs/day all phases 12 36 75 06 CO Load Factor 0 430 0 475 0 465 Load Factor 0 575 0 590 0 430 502 Hours/Day 8 0 8 0 8 0 Hours/Day 8 0 8 0 8 0 PM10 PM10 PM10 TOTAL EXHAUST DUST - - 0 00 - 0 00 42 43 - 1 95 1 95 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 1 72 0 .00 0 O1 0 00 0 O1 44 15 0 00 1 96 1 95 0 OI - - 9 60 - 9 60 90 83 - 4 17 4 17 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 2.75 0 00 0 O1 0 00 D 01 93 58 0 00 13 78 4 17 9 61 44 34 - 1 34 1 34 0 00 3 55 0 00 0 OS 0 00 0 OS 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 DO 0 00 32 29 - 0 79 0 .79 0 00 0 20 0 00 0 02 0 02 D 00 0 27 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 47 89 0 00 1 39 1 34 0 OS 93 58 0 00 13 78 4 17 9 61 *** 2008*** Phase 1 - Demolition Emissions Fu ve Dust - - - - 0 00 - 0 00 0 d Diesel 0 00 0 00 0 OD - 0 00 0 00 0 00 A-6 C,D,E,F,G 257 age• 5 5/09/2006 9 29 AM n-Road Diesel 0 00 orker Trips 0 00 Maximum lbs/day 0 00 hase 2 - Site Grading Emissions ugitive Dust - ff-Road Diesel 0 00 n-Road Diesel 0 00 orker Trips 0 00 Maximum lbs/day 0 00 hase 3 - Building Construction ldg Const Off-Road Diesel 5 45 ldg Const Worker Trips 0 27 rch Coatings Off-Gas 0 00 rch Coatings Worker Trips 0 00 sphalt Off-Gas 0 00 sphalt Off-Road Diesel 0 OD sphalt On-Road Diesel 0 00 sphalt Worker Trips 0 00 Maximum lbs/day 5 72 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 - - - 0 00 - 0 00 0 00 0 00 - 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 DO 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 DO 27 60 44 83 - 1 19 1 19 0 00 0 16 3 31 0.00 0 OS 0 00 0 OS 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 - 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 27 75 48 14 0 00 1 24 1 19 0 OS 27 75 48 14 0 00 1 24 1 19 0 OS • Max lbs/day all phases 5 72 onstruction-Related Mitigation Measures Phase 1 On-Road Diesel Exhaust Use lean-NOx catalyst Percent Reduction(ROG 0 0~ NOx 20 0~ CO 0 0~ S02 0 D~ PM10 0.0~) Phase 1 Off-Road Diesel Exhaust Time and Tune Engines Percent Reduction(ROG 5 0~ NOx 5 0~ CO 5 0~ S02 0 0~ PM10 5 0~) Phase 2 Off-Road Diesel Exhaust• Use lean-NOx catalyst Fercent Reduction(ROG 0 0~ NOx 20 0~ CO 0 0~ S02 0 0~ PM10 0 0~) Phase 2 Unpaved Roads Reduce sp eed on unpaved roads to < 15 mph Percent Reduction(ROG 0 0~ NOx 0 0~ CO 0 0~ S02 0 0~ PM10 40 0~) Phase 2 Soil Disturbance Water 3 X daily Percent Reduction(ROG 0 0~ NOx 0 0~ CO 0 0~ S02 0 0~ PM10 68 0~) Phase 2 Off-Road Diesel Exhaust Time and Tune Engines Percent Reduction(ROG 5 0~ NOx 5 0~ CO 5 0~ 502 D 0~ PM10 5 0~) Phase 3 Off-Road Diesel Exhaust Use lean-NOx catalyst Percent Reduction(ROG 0 0~ NOx 20 0~ CO 0 0~ S02 0 0~ PM10 0 0~) Phase 3. Off-Road Diesel Exhaust• Time and Tune Engines Percent Reduction(ROG 5 0~ NOx 5 0~ CO 5 0~ S02 0 0~ PM10 5 0~) Phase 3 Off-Road Diesel Exhaust Time and Tune Engines Percent Reduction(ROG 5 0~ NOx 5 0'k CO 5 0~ S02 0 0~ PM10 5 0~) hase 1 - Demolition Assumptions tart Month/Year for Phase 1 Aug '07 hase 1 Duration 0 45 months wilding Volume Total (cubic feet) 0 wilding Volume Daily (cubic feet) 0 ales per round trip set to zero ff-Road Equipment No Type Horsepower Load Factor 1 Concrete/Industrial saws 84 0 730 1 Rubber Tired Dozers 352 0 590 2 Tractor/Loaders/Backhoes 79 0 465 hase 2 - Site Grading Assumptions tart Month/Year for Phase 2 Aug '07 hase 2 Duration 1 months n-Road Truck Travel (VMT) 0 ff-Road Equipment • No Type Horsepower Load Factor Hours/Day 3 Rubber Tired Dozers 352 0 590 8 0 3 Tractor/Loaders/Backhoes 79 0 465 8 0 ease 3 - Building Construction Assumptions =art Month/Year for Phase 3 Sep '07 :ase 3 Duration. 14 55 months Start Month/Year for Sub Phase Building Oct '07 SubPhase Building Duration 13 45 months Off-Road Equipment No Type Horsepower Load Factor Hours/Day 1 Cranes 190 0 430 8 0 3 Rough Terrain Forklifts 94 0 475 B 0 3 Tractor/Loaders/Backhoes 79 0 465 B 0 SubPhase Architectural Coatings Turned OFF A-7 Hours/Day B 0 B 0 8 0 C,D,E,F,G 258 Page 6 05/09/2006 9 29 AM Start Month/Year for SubPhase Asphalt Sep '07 SubPhase Asphalt Duration 1 months es to be Paved 2 2 ~oad Equipment Type Horsepower Load Factor 1 Graders 174 0 575 1 Pavers 132 0 590 1 Rollers 114 0 430 • • A-8 Hours/Day B 0 8 0 8 0 C,D,E,F,G 259 age 7 x/09/2006 9 29 AM URBEMIS 2002 For Windows 6 7 0 Lle Name U \UcJobs\_03600-04000\_03700\03731\Urbemis\ Construction urb =o~ect Name Grove Avenue and Foothill Blvd Residential Construction =o7ect Location South Coast Air Basin (Los Angeles area) i-Road Motor Vehicle Emissions Based on EMFAC2002 version 2 2 DETAIL REPORT (Pounds/Day - Summer) instruction Start Month and Year August, 2007 instruction Durataon. 16 ~tal Land Use Area to be Developed 10 acres 3ximum Acreage Disturbed Per Day 5 acres Lngle Family Units 23 Multi-Family Units 75 sail/Office/Institutional/Industrial Square Footage 14000 ONSTRUCTION EMISSION ESTIMP.TES UNMITIGATED (lbs/day) PM10 PM10 PM10 Source ROG NOx CO SO2 TOTAL EY.HAUST DUST x** 2007*** ease 1 - Demolition Emissions agitive Dust - - - - 0 OO - 0 00 Ef-Road Diesel 6 03 46 04 44 66 - 2 OS 2 OS 0 00 Z-Road Diesel 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 ~rker Trips 0 06 0 09 1 72 0 00 0 O1 0 00 0 O1 Maximum lbs/day 6 09 46 13 46 38 0 DO 2 06 2 OS 0 O1 zase 2 - Site Grading Emissions ~gitive Dust - - - 50 00 - 50 DO Ef-Road Diesel 12 92 98 58 95 61 - 9 39 4 39 0 00 i-Road Diesel 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 D 00 ~rker Trips 0 09 0 14 2 75 0 00 0 O1 0 00 0 01 Maximum lbs/day 13 O1 96 72 98 36 0 00 54 40 4 39 50 O1 lase 3 - Building Construction Ldg Const Off-Road Diesel 5 74 37 53 46 67 - 1 41 1 41 0 00 Ldg Const Worker Trips 0. 29 0 17 3 55 0 00 0 OS 0 00 0 OS :ch Coatings Off-Gas 0 00 - - - - - - cch Coatings Worker Trips 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 aphalt Off-Gas 0 26 - - - - - - ;phalt Off-Road Diesel 4 00 24 09 33 99 - 0 83 0 83 0 00 aphalt On-Road Diesel 0 OS 0 86 0 20 0 00 0 02 0 02 0 00 ;phalt Worker Trips 0 02 0 0l 0 27 0 DO 0 00 0 DO 0 00 Maximum lbs/day 6 03 37 70 50 22 0 00 1 46 1 41 0 OS Max lbs/day all phases 13 O1 98 72 98 36 0 00 54 40 4 39 50. 01 r** 2008*** lase 1 - Demolition Emissions igitive Dust .f-Road Diesel 0 00 i-Road Diesel 0 00 ~rker Trips 0 00 Maximum 1bs/day 0 00 lase 2 - Sire Grad,ng Em~ss,ons :gitive Dust - =f-Road Diesel 0 00 i-Road Diesel 0 00 ~rker Trips 0 00 Maximum lbs/day 0 00 lase 3 - Building Construction dg Const Off-Road Diesel 5 74 dg Const Worker Trips 0 27 -ch Coatings Off-Gas 0 00 'ch Coatings Worker Trips 0 00 ,ahalt Off-Gas 0 00 ~phalt Off-Road Diesel 0 00 ,shalt On-Road Diesel 0 00 phalt Wor};er Trips 0 00 Maximum lbs/day 6 O1 Max lbs/day all phases 6 O1 - - - 0 00 - 0 00 0 00 0 00 - 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 DO 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 - - 0 00 - 0 00 0 00 0 00 - 0 00 0 DO 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 36 31 47 19 - 1 25 1 25 0 00 0 16 3 31 0 00 0 OS 0 00 0 OS 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 - 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 36 47 50 50 0 00 1 31 1 26 0 O5 36 47 50 50 0 00 1 31 1 26 0 OS • • • A-9 C,D,E,F,G 260 Page 8 05/09/2006 9 29 AM Phase 1 - Demolition Assumptions Start Month/Year for Phase 1 Aug '07 Ph- 1 Duration 0 45 months B g Volume Total (cubic feet) 0 Bu ng Volume Daily (cubic feet) 0 Miles per round trip set to zero Off-Road Equipment No. Type Horsepower 1 Concrete/Industrial saws 84 1 Rubber Tired Dozers 352 2 Tractor/Loaders/Backhoes 79 Phase 2 - Site Grading Assumptions Start Month/Year for Phase 2 Aug '07 Phase 2 Duration 1 months On-Road Truck Travel (VMT) 0 Off-Road Equipment CO No Type Horsepower Load Factor Hours/Day 3 Rubber Tired Dozers 352 0 590 8 0 3 Tractor/Loaders/Backhoes 79 0 465 8 D Phase 3 - Building Construction Assumptions Start Month/Year for Phase 3 Sep '07 Phase 3 Duration 14 55 months Start Month/Year for SubPhase Building Oct '07 SubPhase Building Duration 13 45 months Off-Road Equipment No. Type Horsepower 1 Cranes 190 3 Rough Terrain Forklifts 94 3 Tractor/Loaders/Backhoes 79 SubPhase Architectural Coatings Turned OFF Start Month/Year for SubPhase Asphalt Sep '07 SubPhase Asphalt Duration 1 months Acres to be Paved 2 2 Off-Road Equipment No. Type Horsepower 1 Graders 174 1 Pavers 132 Rollers 114 CONSTRUCTION EMISSION ESTIMATES MITIGATED (lbs/day) Source ROG NOx *** 2007*** Phase 1 - Demolition Emissions Fugitive Dust - - Off-Road Diesel 5 73 43 74 On-Road Diesel 0 00 0 00 corker Trips 0 06 0 09 Maximum lbs/day 5 79 43 83 Phase 2 - Site Grading Emission s Fugitive Dust - - ~ff-Road Diesel 12 27 74 92 ~n-Road Diesel 0 00 0 00 ,.orker Trips 0 09 C 14 Maximum lbs/day 12 36 75 .06 Phase 3 - Building Construction 31dg Const Off-Road Diesel 5 45 28 52 31dg Const Worker Trips 0 29 0 17 ?rch Coatings Off-Gas 0 00 - ?rch Coatings Worker Trips 0 OD 0 00 ?sphalt Off-Gas 0 26 - ?sphalt Off-Road Diesel 3 80 22 89 ?sphalt On-Road Diesel 0 OS 0 66 ?sphalt worker Trips 0 OZ 0 O1 Maximum lbs/day 5 75 28 69 Max lbs/day all phases 12 36 75 06 *** 2008*** ~ha 1 - Demolition Emissions u e Dust - - )f d Diesel 0 00 0 00 Load Factor Hours/Day 0 730 8 0 0 590 B 0 0 465 B 0 Load Factor 0 430 0 475 0 465 Load Factor 0 575 0 590 0 430 SO2 Hours/Day 8 0 8 0 8 0 Hours/Day B 0 8 0 8 0 PM10 PM10 PM10 TOTAL EXHAUST DUST - - o.oo - 0 00 42 43 - 1 95 1 95 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 1 72 0 00 0 O1 0 00 0 O1 44 15 0 00 1 96 1 95 0 O1 - - 9 60 - 9 60 90 83 - 4 17 4 17 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 2 75 0 00 0 C1 C CO C C1 93 58 0 00 13.76 4 17 9 61 44 34 - 1 34 1 34 0 00 3 55 0 00 0 OS 0 DO D OS 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 32 29 - 0 79 0 79 0 00 0 20 0 00 0 02 0 02 0 00 0 27 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 DO 47 89 0 00 1 39 1 34 0 OS 93 58 0 00 13 78 4 17 9 61 - - 0 DO - 0 00 0 00 - 0 00 0 00 0 00 A-10 C,D,E,F,G 261 age 9 5/09/2006 9 29 AM in-Road Diesel 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 'orker Trips 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 Maximum lbs/day 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 OD 0 DO 0 00 0 00 'hase 2 - Sate Grading Emissions 'ugitave Dust - - - - 0 00 - 0 00 .ff-Road Daesel 0 00 0 00 0 00 - 0 00 0 00 0 00 ~n-Road Diesel 0 00 0 00 D 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 porker Traps 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 Maximum lbs/day 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 'hase 3 - Building Construction Bldg Const Off-Road Diesel 5 45 27 60 44 83 - 1 19 1 19 D 00 41dg Const Worker Trips 0 27 0 16 3 31 0 00 0 OS 0 00 0 OS rch Coatings Off-Gas 0 00 - - - - - - rch Coatings worker Trips 0 00 D 00 0 DO 0 00 D DO 0 00 0 00 sphalt Off-Gas 0 00 - - - - - - .sphalt Off-Road Diesel 0 00 0 00 0 00 - 0 00 0 00 0 00 .sphalt On-Road Diesel 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 .sphalt Worker Traps 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 Maximum lbs/day 5 72 27 75 48 14 0 00 1 24 1 19 0 OS Max lbs/day all phases 5 72 27 75 48 14 0 00 1 24 1 19 0 OS onstructaon-Related Mitigation Measures Phase 1 On-Road Daesel Exhaust Use lean-NOx catalyst Percent Reduction(ROG 0 0~ NOx 20 0~ CO 0 0~ SO2 0 0~ PM10 0 0~) Phase 1 Off-Road Diesel Exhaust Time and Tune Engines Percent Reduction(ROG 5.0~ NOx 5 0~ CO 5 0~ SO2 0 0~ PM10 5 0~) Phase 2 Off-Road Diesel Exhaust Use lean- NOx catalyst Percent Reduction(ROG 0 0~ NOx 20 0~ CO 0 0~ SO2 0 0~ PM10 0 0~) Phase 2 Unpaved Roads Reduce speed on unpaved roads to < 1 5 mph Percent Reductaon(ROG 0 0~ NOx 0 0~ CO 0 0~ SO2 0 0~ PM10 40 0~) Phase 2 Soil Disturbance Water 3 X daily Percent Reduction(ROG 0 0$ NOx 0 0~ CO 0 0$ SO2 0 0~ PM10 66 0~) Phase 2 Off-Road Diesel Exhaust Time and Tur_e Engines Percent Reduction(ROG 5 0~ NOx 5 0~ CO 5 0~ SO2 0 0~ PM10 5 0~) Phase 3 Off-Road Daesel Exhaust. Use lean- NOx catalyst Percent P.eduction(ROG 0 0~ NOx 20 0~ CO 0 0~ SO2 0 0~ PM10 0 0~) Phase 3 Off-Road Diesel Exhaust Time and Tune Engines Percent Reduction(ROG 5 0~ NOx 5 0~ CO 5 08 SO2 0 0~ PM10 5 0~) Phase 3. Off-Road Diesel Exhaust. Time and Tune Engines Percent Reduction(ROG 5 D& NOx 5 0~ CO 5 0~ SO2 0 0~ PM10 5 0'k) hase 1 - Demolition Assumptions tart Month/Year for Phase 1• Aug '07 hase 1 Duration. 0 45 months ualding Volume Total (cubic feet) 0 ualding Volume Daily (cubic feet) D ales per round trap set to zero ff-Road Equipment No Type Horsepower Lo ad Factor Hours/Day 1 Concrete/Industrial saws 84 0 730 8 0 1 Rubber Tired Dozers 352 0 590 8 0 2 Tractor/Loaders/Backhoes 79 0 465 8 0 hase 2 - Site Grading Assumptions tart Mon*_h/Year for Phase 2• Aug '07 hase 2 Duration 1 months n-Road Truck Travel (VMT) 0 ff-Road Equipment No Type Horsepower Load Factor Hours/Day 3 Rubber Tired Dozers 352 0 590 8 0 3 Tractor/Loaders/Backhoes 79 0 465 B.D hase 3 - Building Construction Assumptions part Month/Year for Phase 3 Sep '07 case 3 Duration 14 55 months Start Month/Year for SubPnase Building Oct '07 SubPhase Building Duration 13 45 months Off-Road Equipment No Type Horsepower Load Factor Hours/Day 1 Cranes 190 0 430 8 0 3 Rough Terrain Forklifts 94 0 475 B 0 3 Tractor/Loaders/Backhoes 79 0 465 B_0 SubPhase Architectural Coatings Turned OFF A-11 C,D,E,F,G 262 Page 10 05/09/2006 9 29 AM Start Month/Year for SubPhase Asphalt Sep '07 SubPhase Asphalt Duration 1 months es to be Paved 2 2 Road Equipment Type Horsepower Load Factor 1 Graders 174 0 575 1 Pavers 132 0 590 1 Rollers 114 0 430 • • A-12 Hours/Day B 0 B 0 B 0 C,D,E,F,G 263 Haul Truck Emissions' Construction Vehlcle (1Vloblle Source) Em~sston Factors CO NOx PM] 0 ]b/mile lb/mile lb/mule Heave-Duty Truck : s, ~~~ t'~~"~~ "M'~''~~i '! ,''~+,~.-,`:'~~~1~~J4 Constructwn Worker Number of Trips and Trip Length Vehicle No of One-VVay One VVayTr~p Length Trtps/Day (miles) Water Truck +,~;_ .,.~. _ r*~_L,.- r. -?~~-~ Incremental Increase m Onsrte Combustion Emissions from Onroad Mobile Vehicles Equation: Errussion Factor (Ib/Hole) x No of One-Way Tnps/Day x 2 x Tnp length (mule) =Mobile Emissions (]b/day) Vehlcle CO NOx PM10 'Emission factors and methedology obramed from SCAQMD LST Example Tnbles • A-13 C, D, E,F,G 264 • Water Truck Emissions Construction Vehicle (Mobile Source) Emission Factors CO NOx PM10 Ib/Hole lb/mile lb/mile Hea -Du Truck t9~ .w , . 0:' ~} ~ _ °`" bl? Construction Worker Number of Trips and Trip Length Vehicle No. of One-Way One WayTnp Length Trips/Day (miles) Water Truck Increase m Onsite Combustion Emissions from Onroad Mobile Vehicles • • Equation: Errussion Factor (Ib/mule) x No of One-Way Tnps/Day x 2 x Tnp length (Hole) =Mobile Emissions (lb/day) Vehicle CO NOx PM10 ~ Emus~on factors and methedology obtained from SCAQMD LST Example Tables A-14 C, D, E,F,G 265 EMISSIONS FROM ARCHITECTURAL COATINGS (UNMITIGATED) Construction Worker Trip Emissions Number of Workers 20 Average Tnp Length One-Way (miles) 30 Average Speed (MPH) 35 Daily VMT LDA &LDT 1200 EMFAC 2002 Inputs LDA (grams/mile) LDT (grams/mile) CO 4 371 6 176 NOx 0 49 0 613 PM10 0 011 0 013 SOx 0 003 0 004 VOC 0 204 0 285 Emissions From Commuimg (assumes 50% LDA and 50% LDT) CO NOx PM10 50x VOC Estimated Emissions (Ibs/day) from worker trips 13 95 1 46 0.03 0 01 0 65 80 gallons paint/day 2 OS VOC Content (Ibs/gal) (assumes 250g/I VOC paint) Emissions (Ibs/day) = VOC content of coating (Ibs/gai) X Amount of coating applied (gal/day) 166.4 Ibs/day VOC Total CO NOx PM10 SOx VOC 34.88 3 65 0.08 0 02 168.02 • A-15 C, D, E,F,G 266 • EMISSIONS FROM ARCHITECTURAL COATINGS (MITIGATED) Construction Worker Trip Emissions Number of Workers 50 Average Tnp Length One-Way (miles) 30 Average Speed (MPH) 35 Daily VMT LDA 8 LDT 3000 EMFAC 2002 Inputs LDA (grams/mile) LDT (grams/mile) CO 4 371 6 176 NOx 0 49 0 613 PM10 0 011 0 013 SOx 0 003 0 004 VOC 0 204 0 285 Emissions From Commutrng (assumes 50% LDA and 50% LDT) CO NOx PM10 SOx VOC Estimated Emissions (Ibs/day) from worker trips 34 88 3 65 0 OB 0 02 1 62 80 gallons pamUday 0 832 VOC Content (Ibs/gal) (assumes 100g/I VOC paint) Emissions (Ibs/day) = VOC content of coating (Ibs/gal) X Amount of coating applied (gallday) 66 56 Ibs/day VOC • Total CO NOx PM10 SOx VOC 34.88 3 65 0 08 0.02 68.18 A-16 C, D, E,F,G 267 APPENDIX B URBEMIS COMPUTER MODEL OUTPUT - OPERATIONAL IMPACT ANALYSIS L C, D, E,F,G 268 Page 1 05/08/2006 5 16 PM URBEMZS 2002 For Windows 8 7.0 File Name U \UcJobs\_03600-04000\_03700\03731\Urbemis\Operations.urb . Project Name Grove Avenue and Foothill Blvd Residential Operations Project Location South Coast Air Basin (Los Angeles area) On-Road Motor Vehicle Emissions Based on EMFAC2002 version 2 2 SUMMARY REPORT (Pounds/Day - Summer) AREA SOURCE EMISSION ESTIMATES ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10 TOTALS (lbs/day unmitigated) 7 41 1 53 2 83 0 O1 0 O1 OPERATIONAL (VEHICLE) EMISSION ESTIMATES ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10 TOTALS (lbs/day unmitigated) 8 74 9 39 101.76 0 07 9 89 SUM OF AREA AND OPERATIONAL EMISSION ESTIMATES ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10 TOTALS (lbs/day unmitigated) 16 15 10 92 104 59 0 07 9 90 • B-3 C,D,E,F,G 269 age 2 >/OB/2006 5 16 PM URBEMIS 2002 For Windows B 7.0 1 e U \UcJobs\ 03600-04000\ 03700\0 3731\Urbemis\Operations urb _ Name Grove Avenue and Foothill Blvd Residential Operations ~o~ Location South Coast Air Basin (Los Ange les area) i-Road Motor Vehicle Emissions Based on EMFAC2002 version 2 2 SUMMARY REPORT (Pounds/Day - winter) ?EA SOURCE EMISSION ESTIMATES ROG NOx CO S02 PM10 POTALS (lbs/day unmitigated) 7 13 2 12 0 94 0 00 0 DS ~ERATIONAL (VEHICLE) EMISSION ESTIMATES ROG NOx CO S02 PM10 POTALS (lba/day unmitigated) 7 91 13 59 95 87 0 OS 9 89 JM OF AREA AND OPERATIONAL EMISSION ESTIMATES ROG NOx CO S02 PM10 POTALS (lbs/day unmitigated) 15 04 15 71 96 81 0 06 9 95 • • B-4 C,D,E,F,G 270 Page 3 05/09/2006 5 16 PM URBEMZS 2002 For Windows 8 7 0 File Name U \UcJobs\_03600-04000\_03700\03731\Urbemis\Operations urb • Project Name Grove Avenue and Foothill Hlvd Residential Operations Project Location South Coast Air Basin (Los Angeles area) On-Road Motor Vehicle Emissions Based on EMFAC2002 version 2 2 DETAIL P.EPORT (Pounds/Day - Winter) AREA SOURCE EMISSION ESTIMATES (Winter Pounds per Day, Unmitigated) Source ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10 Natural Gas 0 12 1.52 0 69 0 0 00 Hearth 0 04 0 61 0 26 0 00 0.05 Landscaping - No winter emissions Consumer Prdcts 4 79 - - - - Architectural Coatings 2 19 - - - - TOTALS(lbs/day,unmitigated) 7 13 2 12 0 94 0 00 0 OS • • B-5 C,D,E,F,G 271 age 4 5/08/2006 5 16 PM UNMITIGATED OPERATIONAL EMISSIONS ROG NOx CO S02 PM10 i family housing 1 63 3 07 21 93 0 O1 2 23 on ownhouse general 3 66 6 14 43 78 0 02 4 46 eneral office building 2 42 4 38 30 16 0 02 3 20 OTAL EMISSIONS (lbs/day) 7 91 13 59 95 87 0 OS 9 89 goes not include correction for passby trips goes not include double counting adjustment for internal trips OPERATIONAL (Vehicle) EMISSION ESTIMATES ,nalysis Year 2008 Temperature (F) 50 Season Winter ;MFAC Version EMFAC2002 (9/2002) ummary of Land Uses No Total snit Type Acreage Trip Rate Units Trips Ingle family housing 0 00 9 57 trips/dwelling unit 23 00 220 11 ondo/townhouse general 0 00 5 86 trips/dwelling unit 75 00 439 50 eneral office building 20 97 trips/1000 sq ft 14 00 293 58 Sum of Total Trips 953 19 Total Vehicle Miles Traveled 6,521 03 ehicle Assumptions leet Mix. ehicle Type Percent Type Non-Catalyst Catalyst Diesel fight Auto 55 00 1 60 98 00 0 40 fight Truck c 3,750 lbs 15 00 2 70 95 30 2 00 fight Truck 3,751- 5,750 16 20 1 20 97 50 1 30 ed Truck 5,751- 8,500 7 20 1 40 95 80 2 BO it avy 8,501-10,000 1 10 0 00 81 80 18 20 i vy 10,001-14,000 0 40 0 00 50 00 50 00 ed vy 14,001-33,000 1 00 D.00 20 00 80 00 eavy-Heavy 33,001-60,000 0 90 0 00 11 10 88 90 fine Haul > 60,000 lbs 0 00 0 00 0 00 100 00 rban Bus 0 20 0.00 50 00 50 00 otorcycle 1 70 76 50 23 50 0 00 chool Bus 0 10 0 00 0 00 100 DO otor Home 1 20 8 30 83 30 B 40 ravel Conditions Residential Home- Home- Home- work Shop Other rban Trip Length (miles) it 5 4 9 6 0 ural Trip Length (miles) 11 5 4 9 6 0 rip Speeds (mph} 35 0 40 0 40 0 ~f .~ - Residen,.~al 20 0 37 ~ 43 0 of Trips - Commercial (by land use) eneral office building Commercial Commute Non-Work Customer 10 3 5 5 5 5 10 3 5 5 5 5 40 0 40 0 40 0 35 0 17 5 47 5 B-6 C,D,E,F,G 272 Page 5 05/08/2006 5 16 PM Changes made to the default values for Land Use Trip Percentages The Trip Rate and/or Acreage values for Single family housing have changed from the defaults 9 57/7 67 to 9 57/ The Trip Rate and/or Acreage values for Condominium/townhouse general have changed from the defaults 6 9/4 69 to 5 86/ Changes made to the default values for Area The natural gas residential percentage changed from 60 to 100 The wood stove percentage changed from 35 to 0 The wood fireplace percentage changed from 10 to 0 The natural gas fireplace percentage changed from 55 to 100 The landscape year changed from 2005 to 2008 Changes made to the default values for Operations The operational emission year changed from 2005 to 2008 The operational winter selection item changed from 3 to 2 The operational summer selection item changed from 8 to 7 • B-7 C,D,E,F,G 273 age 6 S/OB/2006 5 16 PM URBEMIS 2002 For Windows 8 7 0 ale Name U \UcJobs\_03600-04000\_03700\03731\Urbemis\Operations urb o Name Grove Avenue and Foothill Blvd Residential Operations Location South Coast Air Basin (Los Angeles area) 7- Motor Vehicle Emissions Based on EMFAC2002 version 2 2 DETAIL REPORT (Pounds/Day - Summer) 2EA SOURCE EMISSION ESTIMATES (Summer Pounds per Day, Unmitigated) Source ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10 4atural Gas 0 12 1 52 0 68 0 0 00 Iearth - No summer emissions ..andscaping 0 31 0 O1 2 15 0 O1 0 O1 =onsumer Prdcts 4 79 - - - - architectural Coatings 2 19 - - - - I'OTALS(lbs/day,unmitigated) 7 41 1 53 2 83 0 O1 0 01 • B-~ C,D,E,F,G 274 Page 7 05/08/2006 5 16 PM UNMITIGATED OPERATIONAL EMISSIONS ROG NOx CO S02 PM10 Single family housing 1 97 2 12 23 20 0 O1 2 23 Condo/townhouse general 4 40 4 24 46 32 0.03 4 46 3eneral office building 2 37 3 02 32 25 0 02 3 20 TOTAL EMISSIONS (lbs/day) 8 74 9 39 101 76 0 07 9 89 Does not include correcti on for passby trips Does not include double c ounting adjus tment for internal trips OPERATIONAL (Vehicle) EMI SSION ESTIMAT ES Analysis Year 2008 Temp erature (F) 90 Season Summer EMFAC Version EMFAC2D02 (9/2002) Summary of Land Uses No Tot al Unit Type Acreage T rip Rate Units Tri ps Single family housing 0 00 9 57 trips/dwelling unit 23 00 220 11 Condo/townhouse general 0 00 5 86 trips/dwelling unit 75 DD 439 50 3eneral office building 20 97 trips/1000 sq. ft 14 00 293 58 Sum of Total Trips 953 19 Total Vehicle Miles Traveled 6,521 03 vehicle Assumptions Fleet Mir. vehicle Type Percent Type idon-Catalyst Catalyst Die sel Light Auto 55 00 1 60 98 00 0 40 Light Truck < 3,750 lba 15 00 2 70 95 30 2 00 Light Truck 3,751- 5,750 16 20 1 20 97 50 1 30 Hed Truck 5,751- 8,500 7 20 1 40 95 80 2 BO Llte-Heavy 8,501-10,000 1 10 0 00 81 BO 18 20 Lite-Heavy 10,001-14,000 0 40 0 00 50 00 50 00 Ned-Heavy 14,001-33,000 1 00 0 00 20 00 80 00 -Ieavy-Heavy 33,001-60,000 0 90 0 00 11 10 88 90 Line Haul > 60,000 lbs 0 00 0 00 0 00 100 00 Jrban Bus 0 20 0 00 50 00 50 DO Kotorcycle 1 70 76 50 23 50 0 00 School Sus 0 10 0 00 0 00 100 00 rotor Home 1 20 8 30 83 30 8 40 Pravel Conditions Residential Home- Home- Home- work Shop Other Jrban Trlp Length (miles) 11 5 4 9 6 0 aural Trip Length (miles) 11 5 4 9 6 0 Trip Speeds (mph) 35 0 40 0 40 0 % Of T1"1LS - RcSidcntial 2D D .~/ D -ice D c of Trips - Commercial (by land use) 3eneral off ice building Commercial Commute Non-work Customer 10 3 5 5 5 5 10 3 5 5 5 5 40 0 40 0 40 0 35 0 17.5 47 5 B-9 • L • C,D,E,F,G 275 age 8 ~/OB/2O06 5 16 PM nanges made to the default values for Land Use Trip Percentages ne rip Rate and/or Acreage values for Single family housing n anged from the defaults 9 57/7 67 to 9 57/ n Rate and/or Acreage values for Condominium/townhouse general have changed from the defaults 6 9/4 69 to 5 86/ nanges made to the default values for Area ne natural gas residential percentage changed from 60 to 100 ne wood stove percentage changed from 35 to 0 ne wood fireplace percentage changed from 10 to 0 ne natural gas fireplace percentage changed from 55 to 100 ne landscape year changed from 2005 to 2008 hanges made to the default values for Operations he operational emission year changed from 2005 to 2008 he operational winter selection item changed from 3 to 2. he operational summer selection item changed from 8 to 7 B-10 C,D,E,F,G 276 APPENDIX C • PROJECT BUILDOUT CONDITIONS SIMPLIFIED CALINE4 CO HOTSPOT OUTPUT • C, D, E,F,G 277 SIMPLIFIED CALINE 4 CARBON MONOXIDE ANALYSIS Protect Title: Grove AvenuelFoothill Background Information Nearest Air Monitoring station measunng CO Upland Background t-hour CO Concentrabon (ppm) 2 Background B-hour CO Concentration (ppm) 1 9 Persistence Factor 0 7 AnalysisYear 2008 Roadway Data Intersection I-275 NB Ramp and Redlands Ave Analysts Condition Existing Plus Ambient Plus Cumulative Plus Project Speed Analyzed Roadway Types No of Lanes A M P M North South Roadway At Grade 4 3 3 East-West Roadway At Grade 4 3 3 A M Peak Hour Traffic Volumes P M Peak Hour Traffic Volumes N I N ~ I I 16 64 96 72 72 B 173 68 173 68 180 96 W < U > E W < V > E 13 52 A A 55 12 24 96 A /1 95 68 556 q > < 1163 76 1379 04 > < 931 84 115 44 V V 154 96 164 32 V V 704 < n > ~ ~ > 197 6 83 2 69 68 127 92 117 52 23 92 S S Wghest Traffic Volumes Nahicies per Hour) N-S Road 338 N S Road 766 48 E-W Road 2063 36 E-W Road 280176 Roadway CO Contribution and Concentrations Emissions = (A x B x C) / 100,000' A, A= A~ fy B C Refrence CO Concentrations Traffic Emission Estimated CO Concentrations Roadway At Edge 25 Feet 50 Feet 100 Feet Volume Factors! At Edge 25 Feet 50 Feet 100 Feet A M Peak Traffic Hour North-South Road 3 3 2 6 2 2 1 7 338 11 15 0 12 0 10 0 06 0 06 East-West Road 11 9 7 5 4 3 8 2063 36 11 15 2 74 1 61 1 24 0 87 o ~~ oeak TnTic Hour North-South Road 3 7 2 7 2 2 1 7 766 48 10 79 0 31 0 22 0 18 0 14 East-West Road 14 7 6 5 4 3 8 2801 76 10 79 4 23 2 30 1 63 1 15 'Methodology from Bay Area Quality Management Distnct BAAOMD CEOA Gwdelines (1999) ~ Emission Factors from EMFAC2002 (2003) Total Roadway CO Concentraoons Peak Hour Emissions =North-South Concentration + East-West Concentration + Background 1-hour Concentration B-Hour Emission =((Highest Peak Hour Concentration -Background 1-hour Concentration) X Persistence Factor)+ Background 8-hour Concentration AM PM Peak Hour Peak Hour 8-Hour At Roadway Edge 4 9 6 5 5 1 25 Feet from Roadway Edge 3 7 4 5 3 7 50 Feet from Roadway Edge 3 3 3 8 3 2 100 Feet from Roadway Edge 2 9 3 3 2 8 ZMethodofogy from Bay Area Quality Management Distnct BAAOMD CEQA Gurdeliness (1999) C-3 • :~ C,D,E,F,G 278 • • THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK • C-4 C,D,E,F,G 279 • .~ • APPENDfX D SCAQMD RULE 401, RULE 403 C, D, E,F,G 280 • (Adopted February 4, 1977)(Alnended Apnl 1, 1977)(Amended August 4, 1978) {Amended September 7, l 979)(Amended February 1, 1980)(Amended July 11, 1980) (Amended October 1 ~, 1982)(Amended March 2, 1984)(Amended February 5, 1988) _ (Amended April 7, 1989)(Amended September 11, 1998) (Alvended November 9, 2001) RULE 401. VISIBLE EMISSIONS (a) Definitions For the purpose of this rule, the following definitions shall apply: (1) KEROSENE FUEL is petroleum distillate fuel meeting diesel grade 1-D per ASTM D975-78, fuel oil grade No. 1 per ASTM D396-79, or kerosene by conventional commercial specifications. (2) AN APPROVED SMOKE-REDUCING FUEL ADDITIVE is as approved by the Executive Officer. (3) A SYNTHETIC ENGINE LUBRICATING OIL is as approved by the Executive Officer. (b) Requirements (1) .a person shall not discharge into the atmosphere :GOm any single source of emission whatsoever any air contaminant for a period or periods • aggregating more than three minutes in any one hour which i (A) As dark or darker in shade as that designated No. 1 on the Ringelmann Chart, as published by the United States Bureau of Mines; or (B) Of such opacity as to obscure an observer's view to a degree equal to or greater than does smoke described in subparagraph (b)(1)(A) of this rule. (2) Not withstanding the provisions of paragraph (b)(1) of this rule, a person Shall riot diSviiargt' llit0 file au`nGSpiteie frUlTl a commercial riZarnrnilPr~ excluding those operating with control equipment and those which are chain-driven, or equipment for melting, heating, or holding asphalt or coal tar pitch for on-site roof construction or repair; any air contaminant for a period or periods aggregating more than three minutes in any one hour ~~~hich is: (A) As dark or darker in shade as that designated No. 2 on the Pvrt~einiuiuj Char, a5 pi1b11511cd by the United SCaLeS LiUreaU OL Mines; or 401-1 D-3 C, D, E,F,G 281 Rule 401 (Cont.) (Amended November 9, ?001) (B) Of such an opacity as to obscure an observer's view to a degree equal to or sreater than does smoke described in subparagraph (b)(2)(A) of this rule (3) Notwithstanding the provisions of paragraph (b)(1) of this rule, a person shall not discharge into the atmosphere frarn any diesel pile-dnvmg hammer, operatnlg e~;clusively using kerosene fuel, containing approved smoke-reducing fuel additives, as the sole fuel, and using only synthetic engine lubrication oil, or other method deemed technologically and economically feasible by the Executive Officer, any air contaminant for a period or periods aggregating more than four minutes during the driving of a single pile which is: (A) As dark or darker in shade as that designated No. 2 on the Ringelmann Chart, as published by the United States Bureau of Mines: or (B) Of such opacity as to obscure an observer's view to a decree equal to or e7'eater than does smoke described in subparagraph (b)(3)(A) of this rule. • (e) Exemptions (1) The provisions of this rule shall not apply to the following operations: (A) Asphalt pavement heater operations; (B) Abrasive blasting operations; (C} The use of visible emission generating equipment in training sessions conducted by governmental agencies necessary for certifying persons to evaluate visible enussions for compliance with this rule and with the California Health and Safety Code, Section 41!704 (I). (D) ~Ttstble L1111~~1~S1J uom :l:!pJ vY111Lh t. ~. l'.Ji121 em v: cenCy Lo:l v~ shutdowns, tests required by governmental agencies or maneuvers for safety purposes; (E) Agricultural operations. {2) The provisions of para~xaph (b)(2) shall not apply to a commercial charbroiler, as described to paragraph (b)(?), on or after November 9, 2005, and thereafter the provisions of para~-aph (b)(1) shall apply to such equipment. 401 - 2 D-4 C, D, E,F,G 282 C, (Adopted May 7, 1976) (Amended November 6, 1992) (Amended July 9, 1993) (Amended February 14, 1997) (Amended December 1 1, 1998)(Amended April 2, 2004) (Amended June 3, 2000 RULE 403. FUGITIVE DUST (a) Purpose The purpose of this Rule is to reduce the amount of particulate matter entrained in the ambient air as a result of anthropogenic (man-made) fugitive dust sources by requiring actions to prevent, reduce or mitigate fugitive dust emissions. {b) Applicability The provisions of this Rule shat] apply to any actwity or man-made condition capable of venerating fugitive dust. (c) Definitions (l) ACTIVE OPERATIONS meaais any source capable of generating fugitive dust, including, but not Iimrted to, eac-th-moving activities, construction/demolition activities, disturbed surface area, or heavy- and • light-duty vehicular movement. (2) .4GGREGATE-RELATED PLANTS are defined as facilities that produce and / or mix sand and gravel and crushed stone. (3) .4GRICULTURAL HANDBOOK means the region-specific guidance document that has been approved by the Governing Board or hereafter approved by the Executive Officer and the U S. EPA. For the South Coast Air Basin, flee Board-approved region-specific guidance document is the Rule 403 Agricultural Handbook dated December 1998. For the Coachella Valley, the Board-approved region-specific guidance document is the Rule 403 Coachella Valley Agricultural Handbook dated Apnl 2, 2004. {4) ANEMOIviETERS are devices used to measure wind speed and direction in accordance with the performance standards, and maintenance and calibration criteria as contained in the most recent Rule 403 Implementation Handbook. (d) BEST AVAILABLE CONTROL, MEASTJRES means fugit~~~e dust control actions that are set forth in Table 1 of this Rule. 403-1 D-5 C,D,E,F,G 283 Rule 403 (cont.) (Amended June 3, 2005) (6) BULK MATERIAL is sand, gravel, soil, aggregate material less than two inches in Iength or diameter, and other organic or inorganic particulate matter. (7) CEMENT MANUFACTURING FACILITY is any facility that has a cement kiln at the facility. (8) CI-IEMICAL STABILIZERS are any non-toxic chemical dust suppressant which must not be used if prohibited for use by the Regional Water Quality Control Boards, the California Air Resources Board, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA), or any applicable law, rule or regulation. The chemical stabilizers shall meet any specifications, criteria, or tests required by any federal, state, or local water agency. Unless otherwise indicated, the use of a non-toxic chemical stabilizer shalt be of sufficient concentration and application frequency to maintain a stabilized surface. (9) COMMERCIAL POULTRY RANCH means any building, structure, enclosure, or premises where more than 100 fowl are kept or maintained for the primary purpose of producing eggs or meat for sale or other • 10 distribution. CONFINED AI rIIvIAL FACILITY ( ) ~ means a source or group of sources of air pollution at an agricultural source for the raising of 3,360 or more fowl or 50 or more animals, including but not limited to, any structure, building, installation, farm, corral, coop, feed storage area, milking parlor, or system for the collection, storage, or distribution of solid and liquid manure; if domesticated animals, including horses, sheep, goats, swine, beef cattle, rabbits, chickens, turkeys, or ducks are corralled, penned, or otheitivise caused to remain in restricted areas for commercial agricultural purposes and feeding is by means other than grazing. (1l) CONSTRUCTION/DEMOLITION ACTIVITIES means any on-site mechanical activities conducted in preparation of, or related to, the buildi;~g, alteration, rehabilitation, demolition or improvement of property, including, but not Iimitcd to the following activities. grading, excavation, loading, crushing, cutting, planing, shaping or ground breaking. (12) CONTRACTOR means any person who has a contractual arrangement to conduct an active operation for another person (I3) DAIRY FARM is an operation on a property, or set of properties that are contiguous or separated only by a public right-of--way. that raises cows or • 403 - 2 D-6 C, D, E,F,G 284 Rule 403 (cont.) (Amended June 3, 200) i produces milk from cows for the purpose of making a profit or for a Iwelihood I-IeLfer and calf farms are dairy farms. (14) DISTURBED SURFACE AREA means a portion of the earth's surface which has been physically moved, uncovered, destabilized, or otherwise modified from rts undisturbed natural soil condition, thereby increasing the potential for emission of fugitive dust This definition excludes those areas which have: (A) been restored to a natural state, such that the vegetative ground cover and soil characteristics are simtIar to adjacent or nearby natural conditions; (B) been paved or otherwise covered by a permanent structure; or (C) sustained a vegetative ground cover of at least 70 percent o£ the native cover for a particular area for at least 30 da}~s. (15) DUST SUPPRESSANTS are water, hygroscopic materials, or non-toxic chemical stabilizers used as a treatment material to reduce fugitive dust emissions. (16) EARTH-MOVING ACTIVITIES means the use of any equipment for any activity where soil is being moved or uncovered, and shall include, but not • be iimrted to the following: grading, earth cutting and filling operations, loading or unloading of dirt or bulk materials, adding to or removing from open storage piles of bulk materials, landfill operations, weed abatement tl}rough disking, and soil mulching. (17) DUST CONTROL SUPERVISOR means a person with the authority to expeditiously employ sufficient dust mitigation measures to ensure compliance with all Rule 403 requirements at an active operation. (18) FUGITIVE DUST means any solid particulate matter that becomes airborne, other than that emitted from an exhaust stack, directly or mdu•ectly as a result of the activities of any person. (19) HIGH WIND CONDITIONS means that instantaneous wind speeds exceed 25 miles per hour. (20} II~TACTIVE DISTURBED SURFACE AREA means any disturbed surface area upon which active operations have not occurred or are not expected to occur for a period of 20 consecutive da}'s. (21) LARGE OPERATIONS means any active operations on property which contains 50 or more acres of disturbed surface area, or any earth-moving operation with a daily earth-moving or throughput volume of 3,80 cubic 403 - 3 • D-7 C,D,E,F,G 285 • Rule 403 (cont.) (Amended 3une 3, 2003} meters (5,000 cubic yards) or more three times during the most recent 365-day period. (22) OPEN STGR4GE PILE is any accumulation of bulk material, which is not fully enclosed, covered or chemically stabilized, and which attains a height of three feet or more and a total surface area of 1 ~0 or more square feet. (Z3) PARTICULATE MATTER means any material, except uncombined water, which exists in a finely dwided form as a Lgwd or solid at standard conditions. (24) PAVED ROAD means a public or pnvate improved street, highway, alley, public way, or easement that is covered by typical roadway maierials, but excluding access roadways that connect a facility with a public paved roadway and are not open to through traffic. Public paved roads are those open to public access and that are owned by any federal, state, county, municipal or any other governmental or quasi-governmental agencies. Pnvate paved roads are any paved roads not defined as public. (2~) PM10 means particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter smaller than or equal to 10 microns as measured by the applicable State and rederal reference test methods. (26) PROPERTY LINE means the boundaries of an area in which either a person causing the emission or a person allowing the emission has the legal use or possession of the property. Where such property is divided ,~~ into one or more sub-tenancies, the property line(s) shall refer to the boundaries dividing the areas of all sub-tenancies. (27) RULE 403 IMPLEMENTATION HANDBOOK means a ~?uidanre document that has been approved by the Governing Board on April 2, 2004 or hereafter approved by the Executive Officer and the U S. EPA. (28) SERVICE ROADS are paved or unpaved roads that are used by one or more public agencies for inspection or maintenance of infrastructure and which are not typically used for construction-related activity. (29) SIMULTANEOUS SAMPLING means the operation of two PM10 samplers in such a manner that one sampler is started within five minutes of the other, and each sampler is operated for a consecutive period which must be not less than 290 minutes and not more than 310 minutes. {30) SOUTH COAST AIR BASIN means the non-desert portions of Los Angeles, Riverside, and San Bernardino counties and all of Orange 443 - 4 D-8 C, D, E,F,G 286 Rule 403 (cont.} (Amended June 3, 2d0~) i County as defined in Caltforriia Code of Regulations, Title I7, Section 60104. The area is bounded on the west by the Pacific Ocean, on the north and east by the San Gabriel, San Bernardino, and San Jacinto Mountains, and on the south by the San Diego county line (31) STABILIZED SURFACE means any previously disturbed surface area or open storage pile which, through the application of dust suppressants, shows visual or other evidence of surface crusting and is t esistant to wind- driven fugitive dust and is demonstrated to be stabilized. Stabilization can be demonstrated by one or more of the applicable test methods contained in the Rule 403 Implementation Handbook. (32) TRACK-OUT means any bulk material that adheres to and agglomerates on the exterior surface of motor vehicles, haul trucks, and equipment (including tires) that have been released onto a paved road and can be removed by a vacuum sweeper or a broom sweeper under normal operating conditions. (33) TI'PICAL ROADWAY MATERIALS means concrete, asphaltic concrete, recycled asphalt, asphalt, or any other material of equivalent performance as detern-iined by the Executive Officer, and the U.S EPA. (34) UNPAVED ROADS means any unsealed or unpaved roads, equipment paths, or travel ways that are not covered by t}pical roadway materials. Public unpaved roads are any unpaved roadway owned by federal, state, count<~.. municipal or other governmental or quasi-governmental agencies. Private unpaved roads are all other unpaved roadways not defined as public. (35) ~~ISIBLE ROADWAY DUST means any sand, soil, dirt, or other solid particulate matter which is visible upon paved road surfaces and which call be removed by a vacuum ssx.~eeper or a broom sweeper under tiori'riai operating conditions (36) WIND-DRIVEN FUGITIVE DUST means visible emissions from any disturbed surface area which is generated by wind action alone. (37) WIND GUST is the maximum instantaneous wind speed as measured by an anemometer. (d) Requii ements (1) No person shall cause or allow the emissions of fiagitive dust from any active operation, open storage pile, or disturbed surface area such that. 403 - 5 D-9 • • C, D, E,F,G 287 Rule 403 (cont.) (Amended .Tune 3, 200-} (A) the dust remains visible in the atmosphere beyond the property !me of the emission source; or (B) the dust emission exceeds 20 percetlt opacity (as determined by the appropriate test method included in the Rule 403 Implementation Handbook), if the dust emission is the result of movement of a motorized vehicle. (2) No person shall conduct active operations without utilizing the applicable best available control measures included in Table 1 of this Rule to mtnimize fugitive dust emissions from each fugitive dust source type within the active operation. (3) No person shall cause or allow PM10 levels to exceed SO micrograms per cubic meter when determined, by simultaneous sampling, as the difference between upwind and downwind samples collected on high-volume particulate matter samplers or other U.S. EPA-approved equivalent method for PM10 monitoring. If sampling is conducted, samplers shall be: (A) Operated, maintained, and calibrated in accordance with 40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Part 50, Appendix J, or appropriate • U S. EPA-published documents for U.S. EPA-approved equivalent method(s) for PM10• (B) Reasonably placed upwind and downwind of key activity areas and as close to the property line as feasible, such that other sources of fugitive dust between the sampler and the property line are minimized. (4) No person shall allow track-out to extend 25 feet or more in cumulative length from the point of origin from an active operation. Nottiv~thstanding the preceding, all track-out from an active operation shall be removed at the conclusion of each workday or evennlg shift. (~) No person shall conduct an active operation with a dtsturbed surface area of five cr more acres, or with a datly import or export of 100 cubic }yards or more of bulk material without utilizing at least one of the measures listed in subparagraphs (d)(~)(A) through (d)(5)(E) at each vehicle egress from the site to a paved public road (A) Install a pad consisting of washed gravel (minimum-size• one inch) maintained in a clean condition to a depth of at least six inches and extendinv at least 30 feet v,~ide and at least 50 feet long. 403-6 D-10 C, D, E,F,G 288 Rule 403 (cont.) (Amended June 3, 2005} (B) Pave the surface extending at ]east 100 feet and at least 20 feet wide. (C) Utilize a wheel shaker/wheel spreading device consisting of raised dividers (rails, pipe, or grates) at least 24 feet long and 10 feet wide to remove bulk material from tires and vehicle undercarriages before vehicles exit the site. (D) Install and utilize a wheel washing system to remove bulk material from tires and vehicle undercarriages before vehicles eartthe site. (E) Any other control measures approved by the Executive Officer and the U S. EPA as equivalent to the actions specified in subparagraphs (d){5)(A) through (d)(~)(D). (6) Beginning January 1, 2006, any person who operates or authorizes the operation of a confined animal facility subject to this Rule shall implement the applicable conservation management practices specified in Table 4 of this Rule. (e) Additional Requirements for Large Operations (1) Any person who conducts or authorizes the conducting of a large operation subject to this Rule shall implement the applicable actions specified in Table 2 of this Rule at alI times and shall implement the applicable actions specified in Table 3 of this Rule when the applicable performance standards can not be met through use of Table 2 actions; and shall: (A) submit a fully executed Large Operation Notification (Form 403 N) to the Executive Officer within 7 days of qualifying as a large operation; (B) include, as part of the notification, the name(s), address(es), and phone nu.inber(s) of the person(s) responsible for the submittal, and a description of the operation(s), including a map depicting the location of the site; (C) maintain daily records to document the specific dust control actions taken, maintain such records for a penod of not less than three years; and make such records available to the Executive Officer upon request; 403 - 7 D-11 C, D, E,F,G 289 Rule 403 (cont.) (_4mended June 3, 2000 (D) instal] and maintain project signage with project contact signage that meets the minimum standards of the Rule 403 Implementation Handbook, prior to initiating any earthmoving activities; (E) identify a dust control supervisor that: (i) is employed by or contracted with the property owner or developer; (ii) is on the site or availzble on-site within 30 minutes during working hours; (iii) has the autl~ority to expeditiously employ sufficient dust mitigation measures to ensure compliance with all Rule requirements; (iv) has completed the AQ1vID Fugitive Dust Control Class and has been issued a valid Certificate of Completion for the class; and (F) notify the Executive Officer in writing within 30 days after the site no longer qualifies as a large operation as defined by parab •aph (c)(18) • (2) ,4ny Large Operation Notification submitted to the Executive Officer or AQI\~ID-approved dust control plan shall be valid for a period of one year from the date of written acceptance by the Executive Officer. Any Large Operation Notification accepted pursuant to paragraph (e)(1), excluding those submitted by agb egate-related plants and cement manufacturing facilities must be resubmitted annually by the person who conducts or authorizes the conducting of a large operation, at ]east 30 days prior to the expiration date, or the submittal shall no longer be valid as of the expiratian date If all fugitive dust sources and corresponding control treasures or special circums`.atices re~~~ain identical to those identified in the previously accepted submittal or in an AQL~ID-approved dust control plan, the resubmittal may be a simple statement of no-change (Form 403NC). (f) Compliance Schedule The newly amended provisions of this Rule shall become effective upon adoption. Pursuant to subdivision (e), any existing site that qualifies as a large operation will have 60 days from the date of Rule adoption to comply with the notification and t ecordkeepmg requirements for large operations. ,4ny Large Operation 403 - 3 D-12 C,D,E,F,G 290 Rule 4U3 (cont.) (Amended June 3, 2U0~) Notification or AQMD-approved dust control plan which has been accepted prior to the date of adoption of these amendments shall remain in effect and the Large Operation Notification or AQ1.~-approved dust control plan annual resubmittal date shall be one year from adoption of this Rule amendment. (g) Exemptions (l) The provisions of this Rule shall not apply to: (.A) Dairy farms. (B) Confined animal facilities provided that the combined disturbed surface area within one continuous property line is one acre or less. (C) Agricultural vegetative crop operations provided that the combined dishnbed surface area within one continuous property line and not separated by a paved public road is 10 acres or less. (D) Agricultural vegetative crop operations within the South Coast Air Basin, whose combined disturbed surface area includes more than 10 acres provided that the person r esponsible for such operations: (i) voluntarily implements the conservation management practices contained in the Rule 403 Agricultural Handbook; • (ii) completes and maintains the self-monitoring form documenting sufficient conservation management practices, as described in the Rule 403 Agricultural Handbook; and (iii) makes the completed self monitoring form available to the Executive Officer upon request. (E) Agricultural vegetative crop operations outside the South Coast Air Basin whose combined disturbed surface area includes more than 10 acres provided that the person responsible for sucli operations: (i) voluntarily implements the conservation management practices contained in the Rule 403 Coachella Valley Agricultural Handbook, and (ti) completes and maintains the self-monitoring form documenting sufficient conservation management practices, as described in the Rule 403 Coachella Valley Agricultural Handbook; and (iii) makes the completed self-monitoring form available to the Executive Officer upon request. 403 - 9 D-13 C, D, E,F,G 291 Ru[e 403 (cont.) (Amended June 3, 2000 (F) Active operations conducted during emergency life-threatening situations, or in conjunction with any officially declared disaster or state of emergency. (G} Active operations conducted by essential service utilities to provide electricity, natural gas, telephone, water and sewer during periods of service outages and emergency disruptions. (H) Any contractor subsequent to the time the contract ends, provided that such contractor implemented the required control measures during the contractual period. (n .Any grading contractor, for a phase of active operations, subsequent to the contractual completion of that phase of earth- moving activities, provided that the required control measures have been implemented during the entire phase of earth-moving activities, through and including five days after the final grading inspection. (.l) Weed abatement operations ordered by a county agricultural commissioner or any state, county, or municipal fire department, provided that: (i) mowing, cutting or other surular process is used which maintains weed stubble at ]east three inches above the soil; and (ii) any discing or similar operation which cuts into and disturbs the soil, where watering is used prior to initiation of these activities, and a determination is made by the agency issuing the weed abatement order that, due to fire hazard conditions, rods, or other physical obstructions, it is not practical to meet the conditions specified in clause (g)(1)(ri)(i) the provisions this clause shall not exempt the owner of any property from stabilizing, in accordance with paragraph (d)(2), disturbed surface areas which have been created as a result of the weed abatement actions. (K) sandblasting operations. (2) The provisions of paragraphs (d)(I}and (d)(3) shall not apply: (A) When wind gusts exceed 25 miles per hour, provided that: 403 - 10 D-14 C, D, E,F,G 292 Rule 403 (cont.) (Amended June 3, 2005) (i) The required Table 3 contingency measures rn this Rule are implemented for each applicable fu~itrve dust source type, and; (it) records are maintained in accordance with subparacraph (B) To unpaved roads, provided such roads: (i} are used solely for the maintenance of wind-generating equipment; or (ii) are unpaved public alleys as defined rn Rule 1186; or (iii) are service roads that meet all of the following criteria• (a) are less than 50 feet rn width at atl points along the raad; (b) are within _'S feet of the property line; and (c) have a traffic volume less than 20 vehicle-trips per day. (C) To any active operation, open storage pile, or disturbed surface area for which necessary fugitive dust preventive or mitigative actions are in conflict with the federal Endangered Specks Act, as determined in writing by the State or federal agency responsible for matting such determinations. (3) The provisions of (d)(2) shall not apply to any aggregate-related plant or cement manufacturing facility that implements the applicable actions specified in Table 2 of this Rule at all times and shall implement the applicable actions specified rn Table 3 of this Rule when the applicable performance standards of paragraphs (d)(1) and (d)(3) can not be met through use of Table 2 actions. (4) The provisions of paragraphs (d)(I). (dl(2), and (dl(;) shall not apply to: ~y) Blasting operations which have been permitted by the California Division of Industrial Safety; and (B) A~otion picture, television, and video production activities when dust emissions are required for visual effects In order to obtain this exemption, the Executive Officer must receive notification in writing at least 72 hours m advance of any such activity and no nuisance results from such activity. (5) The provisions of paragraph (d)(3) shall not apply rf the dust control actions, as specified rn Table 2, are implemented on a routine basis for 403 - I1 D-15 C, D, E,F,G 293 Rule 403 (cont.) (Amended June 3, 200) each applicable fugitive dust source type. To qualify for this exemption, a person must maintain records in accordance with subparagraph (e)(1)(C). (6) The provisions of paragraph (d)(4) shalI not apply to earth coverings of public paved roadways where such coverings are approved by a local government agency for the protection of the roadway, and where such coverings are used as roadway crossings for haul vehicles provided that such roadway is closed to through traffic and visible roadway dust is removed within one day following the cessation of activities. (7) The provisions of subdivision (e) shall not apply to. (A) officially-designated public parks and recreational areas, rncluding national parks, national monuments, national forests, state parks, state recreational areas, and county regional parks. (B) any large operation which is required to submit a dust control plan to any city or county government which has adopted aDistrict- approved dust control ordinance. (C) any large operation subject to Rule ] i~8, v,~hich has an approved dust control plan pursuant to Rule 1158, provided that all sources of fugitive dust are included in the Rule 1158 plan. • (8) The provisions of subparagraph (e)(1)(A) through (e)(1)(C) shall not apply to any large operation with an AQMD-approved fugitive dust control plan provided that there is no change to the sources and controls as identified in the AQMD-approved fugitive dust control plan. (h) Fecs Any person conducting active operations for which the Executive Officer conducts upwind/dov~mwind monitoring for PMIp pursuant to paragraph (d)(3) shall be assessed applicable Ambient Air Analysis Fees pursuant to D..lo 2 ~ A I'..,.1_t r_ r ~.u,., .,~T.l. rippu~auie ~ce5 Slidil 1)e Waived for ?ny faClllt}t i'.':iiC:i iS exempted from paragraph (d)(3) or meets the requirements of paragraph (d)(~)• 403-12 D-16 C, D,E,F,G 294 • 0 0 fV M 7 y '7 a y ~ a3 V ~ o ~ ~ C ~ ~~ O `A" Z. .l O h _yr"'~V o c -.'. ~ ~ C!] C' U ,~ r O ~ ~ ~ d M U ~ J , :J ... ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ^h ~ ~; ~ O ~ ~ YU ~ , ~ ~ r, n •7 U ~ y ~^. ~ O U U ~^~, ~ N p ~ J O y -. U .. O ~ ~ `~ `n bA Ly' O w U ~ ~ ~ O r ^ ~ ci O ~ U~ ~ cJ .. ~j CA ~' O oUD O U y ~~ O q .= ~ O O ~ ~ O ~ ~ ~~~ i L ~ O ~• Ly _ ~ .~ ~ _ L y "'~ V O _^ -L U ~ ~ '-'" r _~ ~ U ~ ~ O O y U ~ _ • y r ") '^,~ ~ c ma y- ~ ~ ~ ~ -0 •r3y ' ~- v~ ~ ~3. ~ ~ .-... ~ y y ~ ~ G Q ~ U • CD ~ 4 ~ _~ ~ T ~ i ` ~ n + U LQ-a W ~~ " o .:+,~ ~ ~ ~ ~,o as 4-w 'O ~ L O L J hfj .V.. ~ .. ~" ~ bA ~ ~ C '7 U O O y ~ ~ O ~ ~ cy U .. rr =, cp 00 °° ~ .. ~ h ~ ~ s .r y ~ o CG _ ~'G >, . 'O%' b y o ~ CS .i ._.. .~ r ~ t.. U ~ U cJ U ~ y ~ r U U ~ L ~ . + ~ ~".~ c 3 ~ ~ ,~ O ~ ~ ~" _ cy O ~- s. cy ~ a~ cA a~ ~ t~ N N m oq ~ '~ ~ N 4J N O ~ ~~ U v y ~ N ~ N '~ .~ W ~~ ~~ ~j ~ ~ _ ~ ~ O C/J _^. V~ C/] ,~ v~ Cn cUU (/~ DA U U U ~ r~ ~ . . V] vOi U1 N m --a N m --+ N m --+ -~ ^-' O 0 0 N N N O O O M ~"1 M 0 0 0 ^3' -~- O O h n :~ ._Oi ~n ~A ~ np OJ ~ ~ .r. ^~' U aq U U ~i M • i M O `7 • D-17 C, D, E,F,G 295 • • 0 0 y •~, d d Q n ;, U ~ ~ .~. '~ ~ ~ ..~. •r rr .:r .~ ,~~_° O h `~-aU •, `i n 7 ..`~.~ M 7 --U, 0 ~ 0 0 ~ ~ - ~ - x i ~ .J w ° y ~ ~• °J ~ ~ c> O c7 ~ y ~ U ~ ~ V N ~ ~ ~ _ ~ ~ - ~ x y N '~ _ cC ~ U p _ ~ ~ bD . . h ~..) -.1 ~ ~ ~ -~ ". N U G ~' G~ ,~ ~ C Q CL \ 1 0 ~ y a .~ C ~ "' .L.~ ~ ~ e°~D~ ~ ~ _ m n ~ ~ ~ °A . ~ ^. N ~ cV cs + ~ U ~ ~ O ~ L y "? ~ c~ y U h a? ~ p U ~ O 7 ~ O . p c C c+r y y ~ ~ ~ ai o• O ~ ~ ~ y ' ~ ~ ~ 7 ~ y r ~ ~ ~ ~ -a v07 r4'-. ~ Q~ vii GD >, y . ~? L ~ r ~ r i ~ v ~ ~. C a eA ^ ~. ~; ~ ~ cs - no > ~ Q~ U > 'V v ~ W ~ ~ _ ~ r - ~ O "O r C :~ ~ N O G U U h y ~ .O y .~ y ,^ :~ ^ ,~ ~ y o" ... , ~ .. Ql U_ ^„~ a> > C O r U '~ ~ • r > ~ 'r fi ~. , . w . r ~, ~ T > y ~ ~ ~ _ __~.., ~ ~` ~ U ~ _,,, U ~ ~ y O ~ ~ -~ _ ,,,~ p n cn d0 ~ C., ~ ti p ~ ~ ~ U 0 O •~ ;.y _ `' ~ ~ a ~ 0 U _~ ~ ~ , f.w U t i _ ~ ~ p ~' pp ~ ~ ~ cs ~ O ~ U O :3 ~ ~-' v U '-~ ' y • ~ ~ ~ .._ Gam. ~ .m. ' ~ `-' U . ' cv r .~ S., ~ V1 ~ ~ V1 ~ .7 ~ ~ ~ . ~ N .~ ~ N ~ ~ U h ~' ~ ~ y V ^~ i N i ~--+ ~ N M 'd' i i i .--~ , N '"' N M V~ O Vl O V' O V"V lp O 0 0 I~ O ('~ O O'~ 07 pj 0 0 O c~ O ~ r ~ DD j ~ ~ O U ~ ~ y ~ c7 ~. i r ~ ~ U ~ ~ ~ ~ U [a~ 4 !ate -D-18 C, D, E,F,G 296 ..f t O .Z. • 0 0 N M v y ~... O ~ ~ ~ . +' L-7 r.y •v ~ .~ ~ _ ~ H ~ • J ""~ ~ L u y ~ ~"~ U ~ d '~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ L"r y ~' :Z ri U Cn ~-' G]. O ...i ~ O U ~ r 0 D1 O v :1 cn U ~ ~ J J U .--. ~ .n cJ . ~ - -~ O •.• 0 0 ~ ~ ? ~ .. ., c~ c ~ '~ ~ ~ .^.. ~ y N O > U ~ p V7 ~ ~ ~ 3 ~ ...., ~ U '~ rJ :3 R U U O ~ .. ~ y ~ `~ c0 ci ` G - ~ Q c3 ti in N O op r^, •~ ~ - ~ p ~ , y i. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ^ C> '~ U ~ > ~ . . ~ JA ~ ~ y h ^~ ~ ^ O ~ O sr 2 _ cJ. cc ~ .+' a~ ~ O v~ rn c3 .~ U iU.. V C C-a O '~ .Z ~ ~ ~ ~ ^T-t ~=+ m ~ rte- ~ ~ V bA ~ ~, ~ '~ CC EJ , .. U .^~r ~ V U ~ U ~ ~ L V O ~ 7 ~ O 'O cC ~ ~ M O "\O y ~ . `~ ~ ~ V .. .+ " '..~ . . .O - - c7 ' y ~ O • ~ y y ~ - L oA 4; v O ' ~ ~ .D ~ i "~ O N p ~ ~ p O y~~ ^ U h y Q U N _ ~ .~ ., ~ y .>+ ~ v ' ar ~ cy O ~ ~ ~ ~ • :7 r- .-. ~ ~ ~ N U U ~ > ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ U ' ~ ~ ' p C/j ~ ? t~ O Ci C!~ Q c3 Q A U --~ N ri '~' ~n -~ --+ N o. a. a a d, o ..'~ . ', 0 0 0 0 0 -~ ,-, ...., bA o ~ ~ Y ' 9? - ~ •~ ' Ri r U o ~ -~ ~ ~ n r~ o ^ a ~ , ~ ro . N ~-/ M O '~' • • D-19 C,D,E,F,G 297 • • • N M r-. ti ~ O a 0 x~ ~ • a ~ J V ~"a ~ ~~ a~ .-. '~ ..r ~ .~ :7 grj .r ^ ~ ' • • --' ~ , w O U ~ a o ~ U ~ , U _ -' 'S J ~ C/] .~ ~, O ~ 3 ,U O O O ~ ~ O ~ ~ .6 ~ y ~ O ~ ~ :~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ;~ h 'J" v~ v O 07 .--. N :3 O , .~-. O ~ y ~ ~ O c7 ~, b ..~G O c+A , ~ i O CD y N O i ,~,q .a: ~ O CJ y CD ' -~ ~ h' o'7 a~ j O eC O -' O ~ y to ~-• y ~ •~ -J •t7 U~ r` o a~ O '~ .- y .^. ~ .~.. ~ ~ • v~ i _. U L. ^ EJ . V. ~ ~ y o °3 ax ^ . . ~ ~ O G •.J r ~ ~ U ~•U v "~ U O 6~ ~ O d n .~ ~ O "' U cn ~ O U ~s ~ ~•~ ~~~~o o '" `= ti C'r ~ ~ ~ .. a~~ 'C3 • ~ .. .. ~~ ~ ~ ~ j ~ `~ ? ~ ~ ° ° 0.3 ~ ~ ~ v - ,- . . ~ ~ ~ ~ >, . •~ ~ .~.. y y N ~ y ~ V ~ ~ .D .~ .~ .D ~ U ~ nq ~ cq 0.„i ~ v] T v] ~ T ~ - cJ v~ v~ .o .~ ~ ~ •-~ N M •-+ N --~ N N N N •--• .--~ .-. M t+1 r-, .... y- d' ~ .-. 7 J ~' L ~ ~ ~ ~ an .~ ~ ~, ~ ~ ~ J ~ ~ U ~ D-20 i M 6 C, D,E,F,G 298 • C N M ^'~ v rr~y, r'1 N -~ o ~ o W ~' a ~o^ r_ '~ ~ .a ~ h ~ G ~ ,= C ~ ~ ~ C ,~ ~ ^~' 41 L ~..i G ~ n .' y ~ ~ o U '~' ~ J U 7 ~ O . -t f!] ~ L ro r '" p -~ '~ a; :+ ^ , r y i O ~ .. cJ '~ ?? - .~ ~ ~ O O O = ' h ~ ~ ~ Y ~ ~ ,,, ~ U r p ~ C3 O _ ~ • '~ y ~ . .~ ~C.., ~ ~ CJ V ~ Q ~A GAD '••' ~ GQ ~ tq c~ ~ .~ ~ 2 y O pj 'a y ~ ~ O ~ ~ V^ y h ~ ~ = U O N ~ ~ O ~ 7 ~ ..O ~r~j ~ . . ~ ~ ~ ~ O ..~ .. DA ~ O d] cd O U 7 c. ~ v- h cq _ 7 "-, as ~p ~ ~ cy cCi ,~ c ~ ~ _ w: ~ ~ ~ a _ _ • ~ U ^ _ ~ • ~ Q~ O ~ ~ L ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ U ~ ti ~ ~ ... > > > > ~ ~ ~ -~ ~ > U O y ~ o y; y ., y • hD ~ ~., ^ J `~ chi -. O h N "p 0 ...~ O- O p O ~ eY ? h ~ Q> cG ~ 'ter c3 v c? - _ p U ~ 50 .~ O .. r h o 3 '' . .. ~. U y .~ ~ s • o .~ .~j CS h y ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ •r :3 O" O O ~ cC U~ h O '-~ p h~ O ~ ;~ h' O " ~ Gq c1 O _, [,' c3 ~ W ~ ~ c~ O ' ~ v, ~ ~U ' :3 :3 G h ~ ~ 4 r ~ ~ y ~ N N U ~ ~ ~ • a" c.7 N ^ ' "~ h v ~ 7 -~ L .~ ~ ~ .~~ ~ h ~ •~ ~ ~ my 1 ~ r~l CJ r-^ O N .-•+ N ~rl ~ v~ ~ ~D [~ t~ o~ y~ tD u v; ., ~ ~ ~ ,~ L ~ ~ ~ U j O U ;J ~ ~~• '" J `~ ~' ~ ~•' O U L v. O , J c3 C+ ;-+ 1 M • D-21 C, D, E,F,G 299 • • • .. ~n 0 0 N M d ^'~ 7 v ~_ d C. r'~ ~~ J O .. a ~ ~ U ;~ H •'~ O au ~ .,"J ~ •• h CJ ~ :J ~ r+ U ~ ? O O y Vi . . M ~ U , , v ~ O _y ~ G ai to ~' .0. vii c°y CJ U "~ ~~ U ~, ~ ~ 6I L ~ U ~ .O ~ ~ 0. _ y ~ ~ ,~ 7 ~ ~ bA ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ U ~ N [+ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 4.y ~ •~. ~_ p ~ L O ~ (~ L p ^ '~ O a~ .C O cy U O O ~ y .?~ , ~ ~ r. v c~ ~ .; .- vi ~ ~ ~ [~ ~ ~ ~ •y ~ L ' a. ~ ~ ~ ~ > y ~ U 'b ~ `~ U s. ~ ~ ~ ~ U •=~ ~ c3 ~ v'l y .ij U ~ '~ vi ~ O ~ '~ . ^ j cct U cs y U -~ "' ~ C ,.,-~ .r sue. > W oA vi ~ ° y ~ ~ J ~_ „ H p ~ ~ G.1 ~ -r". "~ p c3 y J ~ `~ ^ ~ ~ y cE c1 ~ v~ ,~ ~ . U ~ '_. a1 y ., U U r ~ r U O :'J '~ ~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ V O ~ y„ ~ .. ~ _ Cn h ,-~ ~ .~ cS .-.~ > y 7 DA u '~ N i ~ --~ i a a o ~--~ -+ N _O OA ~_ ~ S; .~ cJ U ~ r.+ =d h ^, ~ U ~ O c~ > D-22 C, D, E,F,G 300 c~ M Rule 403 (cont.) (Amended June 3, 2005) Table 2 DUST CONTROL MEASURES FOR LARGE OPERATIONS FUGITIVE DUST SOURCE CATEGORY CONTROL ACTIONS Earth-moving (except (la) Maintain soil moisture content at a minimum of construction cuffing and 12 percent, as determined by ASTM method D- fiIling areas, and mining 2216, or other equivalent method approved by operations} the Executive Officer, the California .4ir Resources Board, and the U S EPA. Two soil moisture evaluations must be conducted during the first three hours of active operations durine a calendar day, and t<vo such evaluations each subsequent four-hour period of active operations, OR (Ia-1) For any earth-moving which is more than ]00 - feet from all property lines, conduct watering as necessary to prevent visible dust emissions from exceeding ] 00 feet in length in any direction. Earth-moving: (Ib) Maintain soil moisture content at a minimum of Construction fill areas: 12 percent, as determined by ASTM method D- 2216, or other equivalent me`~ftod approved by the Executive Officer, the California Air Resources Board, and the U.S. EPA. For areas which have an optimum moisture content for compaction of less than 12 percent, as determined by ASTM Method ] 557 or other equivalent method approved by the Executive Officer and the California Air Resources Board and the U.S. EPA, complete the compaction process as expeditiously as possible after achieving at least 70 percent of the optimum soil moisture content. Two soil moisture evaluations must be conducted during the first three hours of active operations during a CalCnri,a-r da~~~ and ~;~rJ such evaluations during each subsequent four- hour period of active o erations. 403 -19 D-23 • L C, D,E,F,G 301 Rule 403 (cont.) (Amended 3une 3, 2005) Table 2 (Continuedl • FUGITIVE DUST SOURCE CATEGORY CONTROI, ACTIONS Earth-moving: (lc) Conduct watenng as necessary to prevent visible Construction cut areas emissions from extending more than 100 feet and mining operations: beyond the active cut or mining area unless the area ~s inaccessible to watering vehicles due to slope conditions or other safet factors. Disturbed surface areas (2alb) Apply dust suppression in sufficient quantity and (except completed frequency to maintain a stabilized surface. Any grading areas) areas which cannot be stabilized, as evidenced by wind driven fugitive dust must have an application of water at least twice per day to at ]east 80 percent of the unstabilized area. Disturbed surface (2c) Apply chemical stabilizers within five working days areas: Completed of grading completion; OR grading areas (2d) Take actions (3a) or (3c) specified for inactive disturbed surface areas. Inactive disturbed (3a) Apply water to at least 80 percent of all inactive surface areas disturbed surface areas on a daily basis when there is evidence of wind dnven fugitive dust, excluding any areas which are inaccessible to watering vehicles due to excessive slope or other safety conditions, OR (3b) Apply dust suppressants in sufficient quantity and frequency to maintain a stabilized surface; OR (3c) EstabIish a vegetative ground cover within 21 days after active operations have ceased. Ground cover must be of sufficient density to expose less than 30 percent of unstabilized ground within 90 days of planting, and at all tunes thereafter; OR (3d) Utilize any combination of control actions (3a), (3b), and (3c) such that, in total, these actions apply to all inactive disturbed s~!rface areas. _ ~ 403-20 D-24 C, D, E,F,G 302 Rule 403 (cont.) (Amended June 3, 2005) . Table 2 (Continued) FUGITIVE DUST SOURCE CATEGORY CONTROL ACTIONS Unpaved Roads (4a) Water all roads used for any vehicular traffic at least once per every two hours of active operations [3 times per normal 8 hour v<~ork day], OR (4b) Water all roads used for any vehicular traffic once daily and restrict vehicle speeds to 15 miles per hour; OR (4c) Apply a chemical stabilizer to all unpaved road surfaces in sufficient quantity and frequency to maintain a stabilized surface Open storage piles (Sa) Apply chemical stabilizers; OR (Sb) Apply water to at ]east 80 percent of the surface area of all open storage piles on a daily basis when there is evidence of wind dnven fugitive V dust; OR (~c) Install temporary coverings; OR (Sd} Ilistall a three-sided enclosure wrtli walls with no more than 50 percent porosity which extend, at a minimum, to the top of the pile. This option may only be used at aggregate-related plants or at cement manufacturing facilities All Categories (6a) Any other control measures approved by the Executive Officer and the U.S. EPA as equivalent to the methods spectfied in Table 2 maybe used. 403-21 D-25 • • C, D, E,F,G 303 • Rule 403 (cont.) (Amended June 3, 2005) TABLE 3 CONTINGENCY CONTROL MEASURES FOR LARGE OPER.ATmNfi • • FUGITIVE DUST SOURCE CONTROL MEASURES CATEGORY Earth-moving (1A) Cease all actwe operations, OR (2A) .4pply water to soil not more than I S minutes pnor to moving such soil. Disturbed surface (OB) On the last day of actrve operations prior to a areas weekend, holiday, or any other period when active operations will not occur for not more than four consecutive days: app]y water with a mixture of chemical stabilizer diluted to not less than 1/20 of the concentration required to maintain a stabilized surface for a period of sv, months; OR (IB) Apply chemical stabilizers prior to wind event: OR (2B) Apply water to all unstabilized disturbed areas 3 times per day. If there is any evidence of wind driven fugitive dust, watering frequency is increased to a minimum of four times per day; OR (3B) Take the actions specified in Table 2, Item (3c); OR (4B) UtiIize any combination of control actio,~ (1B), (2B), and (3B) such that, in total, these actions apply to all disturbed surface areas. Unpaved roads (I C) Apply chemical stabilizers prior to wind event; OR (2C) Apply water twice per hour during active operation; OR f3C Sto all vehicular traffic Upen storage piles (1D) Apply water twice per hour; OR (2D) Install tem orary coverines. Paved road track-out (lE) Cover alt haul vehicles; OR (2E) Comply with the vehicle freeboard requirements of Section 23114 of the California Vehicle Code for both ublic and rivatc roads. Aii Categories (1F) Any other control measures approved by the E~:ecutive Officer and the U S EPA as equivalent to the methods s ecified in Table 3 may be used. 403-22 D-26 C, D, E,F,G 304 Rule 403 (cont.) (Amended 3une 3, 2005) • Tat~le 4 {Conservation Mana4ement Practices for Confined Animal )facilities) SOURCE CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT PRACTICES CATEGORY Manure (la) Cover manure prior to removtng material off-site, AND Handling (Ib) Spread the manure before 11 00 AM and when wind conditions are less than 25 miles per hour; AND (Only (lc) Utthze coning and drying manure management by removing applicable to manure at laying hen houses at ]east twice per year and maintat Commet•cial abase of no less than 6 inches of dry manure after clean out; or Poultry in lieu of complying with conservation management practice Ranches) (1 c), comply with conservation management practice (1 d). (1 d) Utilize frequent manure removal by removing the manure from laying heti houses at least every seven days and immediately thin bed dry the material. Feedstock (2a) Utthze a sock or boot on the feed truck auger when filling feed Hand[ino storaee bins. Disturbed (3 a) Matntam at ]east 70 percent vegetative cover on vacant portions Surfaces of the facility, OR (3b) Utthze conservation tillage practices to manage the amount, orientation and distribution of crop and other plant residues on the soil surface year-round, while growing crops (if applicable) in narrow slots or tilled strips; OR (3c) AppIy dust suppressants inr'sufficient concentrations and fie uencies to maintain a stabilized surface, Unpaved (4a) Restrict access to private unpaved roads either through signage Roads or physical access restrictions and control vehicular speeds to no more than I S miles per hour through worker notifications, signage, or any other necessary means; OR (4b) Cover frequently traveled unpaved roads with low silt content material (i.e ,asphalt, concrete, recycled road base, or gravel to a minimum depth of four inches); OR (4c) Treat tulpaved roads wtth water, mulch, chemical dust ururessa.~ts cr at her cover to maintain a stabilized s>>rface Equipment {Sa) Apply dust suppressants in sufficient quantity and frequency to Parking Areas maintain a stabilized surface, OR (5b) Apply material with low silt content (t e , asphalt, concrete, recvc]ed road base, or e-t•avel to a de th of four inches . 463-23 D-27 • • C, D,E,F,G 305 • THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK • D-28 C,D,E,F,G 306 APPENDIX E • LIST OFZERO-VOC ARCHITECTURAL COATINGS MANUFACTURERS C,D,E,F,G 307 Super-Compliant Architectural Coating ~lZanufacturers* • The followln; companies have informed the SCAQAZD that they manufacture one or more Super-Compliant Archttectura]/Industria] (AIM) Coahn~s ARCHITECTURAL COATINGS -LL~ ~`ey ;^.'~~75'-,u.x~;y;Y+~.-"r"~.f..-..•=.'_~;'-'lY ~~ -'-,~ ..-~~>`,,.' -'l~nufacttii•er'-''~~-=~~ ~r,^~.=4".F~•~y:~~~.~t;~ . ';•=Type of+C'oa[ing '~? >~ .~`.f3`~5=4'^,'?' -~ 3n~erior- T.-`--~"-e'y^'a.ay ~i~enor~ C^~.-Y..c"--~ -`"P ho T eN > ~, `~i4.Si~n"'V1C-`.-T-,!',f~V,'.Y"'v~ .w~Y~:.t,:-_^*i l.(Y:~ - ,~ ~ ~ -si'jY~ - -r~r.-°'.~..y~,Sj.,-~~~ it ,. h~ a- ~..F• M _ -., . :~+~ , . n um ier~ _ .~-~('-"..+Fi~°e+W,~-" r,hs:agcn Corporanon PSU, ^ YES y0 860-280-0001 hrinl+wvh+, rnbwrl crnn 305-9'6-8691 Atnencan FotmulatoR Mfg htm hwuni ,ar-frcoa'nantt mm F, NFE, NFSG 1'ES N4 619.239-G321 AncnorPamt hh ~ iht~w, anchn atnt cost VJPC/1~:5 NO YES 915-836-4626 &cn~amtn Moore 8. Co htt ~ /lav.v hcn1amtnm_aarc c_o_m_ PSU, F, NFS, 7vFE, NFSG 1'ES NO 201-573-9600 Govcrdale Patzt Ine ntm / wv w c lnvrro.^lcn. mt t o"t !'SU, NF, Ov1 ~'ES I YES ! 6C~4 596 626 ] Coronado Pant Co hl_~%Iwuw~ coronna4 rm_i -o~n F, NF, PSL YES NO 386-425-6461 xl IS Diamond Vogel nn !Avv.v~ dtmnonceo^cl rom F, NF, P YES 1dU 800-725-6435 Dunn Ecwards h ,hwwta ounnceduard~ crnn F, NF YE5 NO S8S-~3',-2468 E-3 Coaungs, lnc ht 'htv'u cnwrolastccm S NO 1'ES 530.305-2159 Frazee Industnes Mn /Ju ww fre^crna~nt rc PSU, F, T.'FS, NFE, Ni SG 1'ES NO 858-62C-3490 Fuhr lntcmanonal, LLC PSU, F N'F 1'LS YES 800-558-7437 httn rl0.'WV. fuh:rrtctmntwnal cot , 516-509-4403 1CI Paints ham; ~//wu>u- ; ctault.a p~nnts.cetp Pro ptunters htn r/uwtl devr,~ cnaur. >e c L\4 coatings PSU, F, Nl-S, NFE, NFSG"' Y'ES 1'ES 440-S2b-5519 ~tth,-riu;t~ty aumcc cnm MSDS B I'DS hho rlwwu ineacr. c~tLn Retail for homeowners h _ '/g~gw_tc~ cnm Corttorztc I:ry2on ntin >'wwu_`t rvtor co-n --- R'PS I _ YCS YES A4;Ilcr Paint hit rhva^rjmilc am> o_'y I PSU, F, NFE, NFS 1'ES NO 50307-2532 Monopac Inc htn ;Iwu'w' one tnletnc com IM, WPS, WPClA1S 5 ES YES 518-500-8585 Pohbnd Coatings h /lwutiv nahbnd ccm F, NF, PSU YES 1'ES 956-631-78] 8 R;chards Yamts httv_r/www nchrrd;~amtconv' F, NFR, NFS YES NO 500-432-0983 Rodda Paints //wu'w rctddrrmtc_rn_n_I PSU, F, ti =E, NFS YES NO 503-731.6031 x605 ] Sampson Coa4nes, ]nc httn %/wu'v~ sam sc^_t oarnt+~ engl PSU, F, NF YES I'ES 804.359.5011 Samuel Caoot, Inc t,tt^ /h;mr>~ cabrt~ta~r ccm ~'~S NO YLS 500-877-8246 S eaJ-I;rete L-,c I htt //ww~n'seal-krereco_m pSU p }'ES IBS 800-323-7n57 x541 Sterna Performance by Rust-Olcum PSU F NF YES YES 800 rtt ,;w~xw n,stnl~arr~~ , , -553-8444 Sth~crtovm Products 1=tt~ //wunv rhmeetta*d coin S, CWF NO YES I 909-986-7061 Spectra-Tone Pent htt t ~'wv-w a oche-M~c cetn! T F, NFE, T~FSG YES NO 30D-272-4687 Tned 3r. True Wood Ftn;shes han ;hvwnv tr(edandtniewoodfin sh cnm CRS YES NO 607.357-9280 VOC Free Nc Websrte FLUOR SE4LER, PSU F, Iv`F YES YES 207-457-122] E-3 • • C,D,E,F,G 308 • :~ A u a Super-Compliant Architectural Coating Manufacturers`" The followln; companies have informed the SCAQMD that the}' manufacture one or more Super-Compliant ArchriecturaUIndustnal (.AIM) Coatinbs INDL;STRIAL MAINTENANCE CO.ATTNGS • • • - r. °•-~._ f,,, '^-`~~a. ~ _ .}^ tit}'-^- t_-~-..!^-r ..~~ may. ... i-.- _ .-~"~:~'~r.:'~ ~~.. ~~. Fs-nr~S~'+,r. 'a?.r_:.~ -~+_~aSL~y'~7`r~x:y~; :,.a,r /,~a s' _~, m... - ^- _ .a+= - : -u,.,,.- (~,, ~ ~,..~_ 5,...~e,"~~~i~~m' IIICItISi•FtZ~}~~I~ltiEII2nCC"~a~IlLsS,1r~~~~ -g"..,,s 1z.`7g~-.- :"~ ~ w+Y _ _ _ :r ~_:.Y„~,,; ~'_~w--rG~'~ x,z-~-~,-.s^~,~~~a=' '':~ ~~-`"~r1l~~nnfacu rQt`-==~~~ ~~` ~ = _ ~~ks . rra,..r~ ~, :trse'.~'~t ~ ~`~".--•,~- cr2~:«',...,. .~.a1."'s : L~...r_, - ~. ~1yx.: ==a"43 : ~'~~"~ ~.'o""~'~a'fiitgs~ ~Itifeno F' u-I ~'_.^.rt- yp ~ 'rxlen Plione;Nuln er'c ~ _ ~ . ~ K , ~ _r __ .~- - T4LY{^v`...r~_iv.- f~ r`~-T `alr_f ~^ -/•~ - .-. - ,., ..r- ,_ <;_; ~ .., z ~e9Y':~[-=-`-7f~.. S'2::-~aF'au':'SY +av.n t.-. :~_.'-iyi •~M4-~: ~-~:_.L..-~~~~-^ ~ ~ ' y„ J- ' w Amcron, ]nil htt //wxti• amnoncoann c ccm,'v~~dcome_cfm VARIOUS SYS'1'i'MS I 1 ES l YES B00-926.3766 Duromar htm /hxnx yr d_uromnr_com' VARIOUS SYSTEMS YES YES 751-749.6992 If B Han Pohcnc-s rt, /). /grµrv., hen_oa.i r_s coin' VARIOUS SYSTEMS 5'ES YES i 630-5?4-] 729 Novocoat (Formerly) Supeno- Environmental Proeucts, me VARIOUS SYSTEMS YES YES 97_-490-0556 hn ~~ vnvv nov,,crr•t coin ~ Pacific Polymer hug /wwv acn~ivcc»n/ VARIOUS SYSTEI,4S 1'ES YES 60U-SSb-5340 Specialty Produce lnc htm //www s ccrritr- roducu rnm VAKIOL'S SYSTE1v4S I YES YES 253- 983-7530 Unrted Coatings hr :/wnwumudconnrescom' VARIOUS SS'STLMS YES 1'ES 800-541-4383 CWF Clear Wood finish F Flars NF Nonflat NFS Nonflat -satin NFE 1\onfiat - eggshell NFSG Nonflat - scrnrgloss PSU Pnmers, sellers, and unaercoaters S Stains WPS V. aterproofing Sealer WTCMS Waterproofing Conneu'Mesonry Sealers " Super-complant coarrngs are defined as those rocungs that have a D'OC content less than the YOC conrent hmrts set jor7h for the can ent and/ar future Jrmus to the Table ofStandards formd rn parasr aph tc)(Z)ofRvle 111 s and spec fv a irUC conten! less rhan 10 g/! VOC "" Not avarlablc for exterior use Tnrs rs not an all-rnclusrve luf o+'super-complrant coatrngs avmlcble from marvjacrurers/suppJrers who have utjormed SCAQMD that they ran provide the super-complrant products Jrrted The SCAQhID rn no way endorses arty ojthese companies nor does t! cerrlfy their abilrry to meet the regvrrcmenGr ojP.ule 1113 Archrrcctural Coatings If you want your company atc/uded m the pope, please scud your request to d1~nn~,caam.j._•ov or cal/ Don Hopps at (909J 39G-:334 Super-Compliant_AII~4 ndf Last Upaatc 07t"37/OS E-4 C,D,E,F,G 309 APPENDIX F • EXISTING TRAFFIC COUNTS AND EMISSIONS FACTORS USED IN CO ANALYSIS (PROJECT BUILDOUT CONDITIONS) C,D,E,F,G 310 COUNTS UNLIMITED INC 25424 JACLYN AVENUE MORENO VALLEY CA 92557 951-247-6716 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA N/S GROVE AVENUE FOOTHILL BOULEVARD WEATHER SUNNY Flle Name RCGRFOAM Slte Code 0517420 Start Date 4/12/2006 Page No 2 GROVE AVENUE Out In Total 146 179 16 931 7 Right Thru Left ~' 1 ~- Peak Hour Data o=m T o!~•- ro 1 A ~~O .- ~ ~+ - O > °;~ North ~ ~n ~' _ w - in J m c `~ ~ r-~ Peak Hour Begins at 07 30 AM F-2 - N ~ o J ~ ~ ~ ~~ r TOTAL VOLUME r~ r m ~p ~~ ^~ i ~Y a o a p0~ ~c W~~ O I Left Thru Ri ht 190 BO 67 353 33 690 Out In Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07 00 AM to 08 45 AM -Peak 1 of 1 n.... t. V....- f... C..,.~ A....-,.,, .. {. 4e........, 07 UO AM 07 45 AM 07 10 AM 07 30 AM +0 mtns 9 19 6 34 42 264 10 316 45 19 16 80 3 138 32 ]73 +t5 mms 18 14 9 41 32 163 18 313 44 13 11 F8 4 150 25 179 +30 mms 18 37 6 61 40 348 17 405 57 29 20 106 2 137 26 165 +45 mms 2U 22 3 45 37 268 ]3 318 44 19 20 83 4 110 28 ]42 Total Volume 65 92 24 181 I51 1 ]43 58 1352 190 80 67 337 13 535 1 I l 659 %A n Total 359 508 133 ]12 845 43 564 237 ]99 2 812 168 PHF 813 622 667 742 899 821 806 835 833 690 838 795 813 892 867 920 F-3 • • • C,D,E,F,G 311 COUNTS UNLIMITED INC 25424 JACLYN AVENUE MORENO VALLEY CA 92557 951-247-6716 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ~(~!/S GROVE AVENUE FOOTHILL BOULEVARD WEATHER SUNNY • Ftle Name RCGRFOPM Slte Code 0517420 Start Date 4/12/2006 Page No 2 GROVE AVENUE In Total 59 54 3 13 3 Right Thru Left ~ 1 ~-- Peak Hour Data ~~ QHN NCJ ~ I~p~ W O~ w ~ North ~ ~ J ~ .. r --1 m c '' ~ L-/ Peak Hour Begins at 05 00 PM F-2 ~ m ~ p ~ ~~ ~ w C m .. ~ ~ L TOTAL VOLUME ~ ~ 1 pp ^tr~ i ~~o° ~~ ~ LL _ ~, T r Left Thru Ri ht 167 167 174 508 8 9 Out in Total Peak Hour Analysts From 04 00 PM to 05 45 PM -Peak 1 of 1 ..L A ., ..L 0........... OS OU PM OS DU PM 04 30 PM OS 00 PM +0 mtns 29 38 7 74 24 222 ]6 262 36 29 46 ]I1 4 314 34 352 +IS mms 41 32 10 83 24 Z3R ]~ 27R 45 44 42 131 ? ?6o a4 a16 +30 mms 31 15 2 48 16 210 31 2S7 45 52 55 152 8 345 48 40] +4S mms 22 28 4 54 36 226 29 291 42 45 43 130 9 298 32 339 TotalVolome ]23 113 23 259 100 896 92 1088 168 170 186 S24 24 1326 158 1508 °~6A Total 475 436 89 92 824 8S 321 324 3S5 ] 6 879 lOS PHF 750 743 S7S 780 694 941 742 935 933 817 845 862 667 898 823 906 • F-4 C, D, E,F,G 312 This Spreadsheet Predicts Com osite CO Emissions Factors For Use In the CO CALINE4 Model Analysis ~- Hourly Mdes (x1000) (From BURDEN2002) ~, Hourly Idle Emissions (Tons} (From Buden 2002) Hourly Start Emissions (Tons) (From Buden 2002)~`~$;~ Input Run Emissions (Grams/Mile) (From EMFAC2002) (@ 60 Degrees F, 70% humidity) Model Year = ~`, `~.~~~~Qi~~,~~ AREA= ~b~`~~~'r.~irafl~i~t~z PEAK HOUR= ~~~M~. INPUT PARAMETERS OUTPUT PARAMETERS Average Idle Emissions (Grams/Mile) Average Start Emissions (Grams/Mile) Average Total Emissi ons (Grams/Mde (Includes Idle, Start, 13 MPH ~ and Running Emissions) 4 MPH C 5 MPH _ 6 MPH 7 MPH 8 MPH 9 MPH 10 MPH 11 MPH 12 MPH 13 MPH 14 MPH _ 15 MPH 16 MPH ~~ " 17 MPH 18 MPH 19 MPH _ 20 PJlPH ~~,~ 21 MPH z~ 22 MPH _ 23 MPH _ _ 24 MPH ~ 25MPH e 26 MPH ,~. 27 MPH ~" 28 MPH ~4~ 29 MPH 3 30MPH _ r5"-e 31 MPH _~' 32 MPH - z_. ,~ _ 33 MPH .~~ 34 MPH ~~ 35MPH F-5 • J C, D, E,F,G 313 This Spreadsheet Predicts Composite CO Emissions Factors For Use In the CO CALINE4 Model Analysis Model Year = '~,,~ ; " ,,~~QA.Bt~~`I,s~ AREA= ~ai~~:~i~5aT6ir~~'~~t'~"s '~°` PEAK HOUR= ~-~''~' ,l1"(l~~~Y INPUT PARAMETERS Hourly Miles {x1000) (From BURDEN2002) ~J~t; Hourly Idle Emissions (Tons) (From Buden 2002) ~~-;~ Hourly Start Emissions (Tons) (From Buden 2002) ~~~~ Input Run Emissions (Grams/Mile) (From EMFAC2002) (@ 60 Degrees F, 70% humidity) OUTPUT PARAMETERS Average Idle Emissions (Grams/Mile) Average Start Emissions (Grams/Mde) Average Total Emiss L ~ -~~ nd Running Emissions) F-6 C,D,E,F,G 314 • • APPERQlX G WINDROSE EXHIBIT C,D,E,F,G 315 • W ~D R06E PLOT L7SPLAY` \1~lCKl Speed (Upland Station DaFa) Oiredion(hlowingfran) 25%, • 20% 15% 10"/0 5%' ,' V4ES7 EAST SOUTH OCMVQ~fT~' ~4TA P2~IC0 CQVPANYNNUE 1981 Jan 1 -Dec 31 00:00 -23:00 nrtxa~t C11LM1M~DS TOTAL OCIM 5.59% 8760 hrs. • AVG W IUD SAD Ll4TE 206 mis 5/9/2006 1/~l NC SPEEC (m/s) ® ~ 11 1 . 88-111 - 57- 88 - 36- 57 a 21-36 . 0.5 - 2 1 Calms 559°6 PR~TNO W~LOT View- Lakas Ernntomrnt~ SdMae C,D,E,F,G 317 • THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK • • G-4 C,D,E,F,G 318 City of Rancho Cucamonga MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION The following Mitigated Negative Declaration is being circulated for public review in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act Section 21091 and 21092 of the Public Resources Code. Project File No.: GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2006-00223, DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT DRC2006-00350, DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DRC2007-00029, TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18179, DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2006-00341 Public Review Period Closes: June 27, 2007 Project Name: Project Applicant: Arbors at Route 66, LLC Project Location (also see attached map): Located at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Grove Avenue - APN 0207-011-35, 36, 41, 43, 44, and 45 Project Description: A request to change the land use designation from Open Space to Mixed Use to be consistent with the Mixed Use land use designation and to change the zoning from Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) to Mixed Use to be consistent with the Mixed Use zoning designation for four parcels on Redhill Country Club Drive at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Grove Avenue, and to add these same four parcels to Section 2 5 5 4 Western Gateway in the Bear Gulch Area, to change the table for the Bear Gulch Mixed-Use area contained in Development Code Section 17 32 020 C 3 to expand the range of development in the Residential classification to 87% and to include the "Most Case" column found in the General Plan Table III-7, and to establish a Master Plan Overlay District for the entire 10 1 acre prolect site on the Land Use Plan in accordance with Section III 2 4 1 of the General Plan and on the Development District Map in accordance with Section 17 20 030 of the • Development Code, and to subdivide 10 1 acres into two lots for the purpose of developing one 2-story office building on Lot 1 and 7 live/work units, 68 town homes, and 23single-family residences on Lot 2 in the Mixed Use Zone of Subarea 1 of the Foothill Boulevard Districts FINDING This is to advise that the City of Rancho Cucamonga, acting as the lead agency, has conducted an Initial Study to determine if the project may have a significant effect on the environment and is proposing this Mitigated Negative Declaration based upon the following finding: The Initial Study identified potentially significant effects but (1) Revisions in the project plans or proposals made or agreed to by the applicant before this proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration was released for public review would avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant effects would occur, and (2) There is no substantial evidence before the agency that the project, as revised, may have a significant effect on the environment If adopted, the Mitigated Negative Declaration means that an Environmental Impact Report will not be required. The factual and analytical basis for this finding is included in the attached Initial Study. The project file and all related documents are available for review at the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department at 10500 Civic Center Drive (909) 477-2750 or Fax (909) 477-2847. NOTICE • The public is invited to comment on the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration during the review period. June 27, 2007 Date of Determination Adopted By C, D, E,F,G 319 RESOLUTION NO 07-35 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2006-00223, A REQUEST TO CHANGE THE LAND USE DESIGNATION FOR FOUR PARCELS ON RED HILL COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE FROM OPEN SPACE TO MIXED USE TO BE CONSISTENT WITH THE MIXED USE LAND USE DESIGNATION AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND GROVE AVENUE, TO ADD THESE SAME FOUR PARCELS TO SECTION 2.5.5 4 WESTERN GATEWAY IN THE BEAR GULCH AREA, EXPAND THE RANGE OF DEVELOPMENT IN THE RESIDENTIAL CLASSIFICATION TO 87 PERCENT IN TABLE III-7, AND TO ESTABLISH A MASTER PLAN OVERLAY DISTRICT FOR THE ENTIRE 10 1 ACRE PROJECT SITE ON THE LAND USE PLAN IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION III 2 4 4 OF THE GENERAL PLAN; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN• 0207-011-35, 36, 41, 43, 44, AND 45. A. Recitals. 1. Arbors at Route 66, LLC filed an application for General Plan Amendment DRC2006-00223 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject General Plan Amendment is referred to as "the application." 2. On June 27, 2007, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. • 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows• 1 This Commission hereby speafically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on June 27, 2007, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows a. The application applies to approximately 101 acres of land, basically an irregular quadrangle configuration, located at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Grove Avenue and is presently agriculturally and residentially developed The residentially developed portion of said property subject to a Land Use Designation change, roughly the four parcels in the easterly 1 04 acre of the subject property, is currently designated as Open Space and is not included in the Western Gateway in the Bear Gulch area, and b. The property to the north portion of said property subject to a Land Use Designation change is designated Open Space The property to the west is designated Mixed Use and is included in the Western Gateway in the Bear Gulch area. The property to the east is designated Open Space The property to the south is designated Mixed Use and is included in the Western Gateway in the Bear Gulch area The remainder of the subject property is designated Mixed Use and is included in the Western Gateway in the Bear Gulch area. C, D, E,F,G 320 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 07-35 DRC2006-00223 -ARBORS AT ROUTE 66, LLC June 27, 2007 Page 2 c Portions of the City designated for Mixed Use can benefit from the application of a Master Plan Overlay District with a carefully designed development; and d This General Plan Amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development within the district m a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development, and e. This General Plan Amendment does promote the goals and objectives of the Land Use Element, and f. This General Plan Amendment would not be materially incurious or detrimental to the adtacent properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties. 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows a. That the subcect property is suitable forthe uses permitted in the proposed district in terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land use in the surrounding area; and b. That the proposed General Plan Amendment would not have significant impacts on the environment nor the surrounding properties; and • c That the proposed General Plan Amendment is in conformance with the General Plan. • 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: a Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the protect Based on the findings contained m that Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the protect would have a significant effect on the environment Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared Thereafter, City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. b. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it, finds (i) that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared incompliance with CEQA, and (ii) that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the protect will have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission further finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent Judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission Based on these findings, the Planning Commission hereby adopts the Mitigated Negative Declaration c. The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the protect that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during protect implementation The Planning Commission therefore adopts the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the protect. C, D, E,F,G 321 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 07-35 DRC2006-00223 -ARBORS AT ROUTE 66, LLC June 27, 2007 Page 3 d. The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring Program, and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the Planning Commission's decision is based is the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 477-2750. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below. Environmental Mitiaation Air Quality 1) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions. The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications. Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for~City verification 2) Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, the developer shall submit construction plans to City denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low- emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was • investigated and found to be infeasible for the project Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning staff. 3) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high volume, low-pressure spray. 4) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108. 5) All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 401, 402 and 403. Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions• • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods. • Dispose of surplus excavated material m accordance with local ordinances • and use sound engineering practices. C, D, E,F,G 322 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 07-35 DRC2006-00223 -ARBORS AT ROUTE 66, LLC June 27, 2007 Page 4 Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. Suspend grading operations during high winds (i e., wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with Rule 403 requirements Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means. 6) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWQCB]) dailyto reduce Fine Particulate Matter (PM,o) emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. 7) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions. 8) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel-powered equipment where feasible. • 9) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. 10) All industrial and commercial facilities shall post signs requiring that trucks shall • not be left idling for prolonged periods (i e., in excess of 10 minutes) 11) All industrial and commercial facilities shall designate preferential parking for vanpools. 12) All industrial and commercial site tenants with 50 or more employees shall be required to post both bus and Metrolink schedules in conspicuous areas. 13) All industrial and commercial site tenants with 50 or more employees shall be required to configure their operating schedules around the Metrolink schedule to the extent reasonably feasible 14) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate high- efficiency/low-polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters. 15) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping. 16) Use of Zero-VOC paints (assumes no more than 100 grams/liter of VOC) such as those listed by the SCAQMD of Super-Compliant Architectural Coating Manufacturers. Biological Resources 1) A Tree Removal Permit must be approved that provides for the replacement of • the 12 on a 1 1 ratio basis with no fewer than two California Sycamores (Platanus Racemosa) placed in a prominent location m the project. C, D, E,F,G 323 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 07-35 DRC2006-00223 -ARBORS AT ROUTE 66, LLC June 27, 2007 Page 5 Cultural Resources 1) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or presence them for study With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will: • Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value. • Consider establishing provisions to require incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point. • Pursue educating the public about the area's archaeological heritage. • Propose mitigation measures and recommend conditions of approval to eliminate adverse protect effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, following appropriate CEQA guidelines. • Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the • inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the protect area. Submit one copy of the completed report with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. 2) If any paleontological resource (i.e. plant or animal fossils) are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified paleontologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i e., paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate. Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures. Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing activities. Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage. If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find. • Prepare, identify, and curate all recovered fossils for documentation in the summary report and transfer to an appropriate depository (i e., San Bernardino County Museum) C, D, E,F,G 324 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 07-35 DRC2006-00223 -ARBORS AT ROUTE 66, LLC June 27, 2007 Page 6 Submit a summary report to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to San Bernardino County Museum. Geology and Soils 1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PMio emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 or re-planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM~o emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM,o emissions from the site during such episodes 4) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions. Hydrology and Water Quality Construction Act~v~ties: 1) Prior to issuance of grading permits, the permit applicant shall submit to Building Official for approval, Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SW PPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 2) An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included in the Grading Plan, and implemented for the proposed project that identifies specific measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading This Erosion Control Plan shall include the following measures at a minimum: a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site oroff-site as a result of this protect will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame. 3) During construction, temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff. • • 4) During construction, to remove pollutants, street cleaning will be performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site C, D, E,F,G 325 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 07-35 DRC2006-00223 -ARBORS AT ROUTE 66, LLC June 27, 2007 Page 7 • Post- COnstrUCtlon O erat~onal• P 5) The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in the Water Quality Management Plan (W QMP) prepared by Fuscoe Engineering on July 3, 2006, to reduce pollutants after construction entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 6) Landscaping plans shall include provisions for controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth. Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permits. 7) Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Engineer for approval of a WQMP, including a project description and identifying BMPs that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable. The WQMP shall identifythe structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004. 8) Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e., a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Building Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit. Noise Exterior: 1) Construct a 5-foot high barrier for Lots (Units) 7 through 10 and Lots (Units) 72 through 92 facing Foothill Boulevard and Grove Avenue. 2) Construct a 5-foot high second floor balcony noise barrier for Lots (Units) 88 and 89 facing Foothill Boulevard. Interior: 3) Provide a "windows closed" condition requiring a means of mechanical ventilation for all homes 4) Provide standard dual-glazed windows with a Sound Transmission Class (STC) rating of 26 or higher for all units and homes facing Grove Avenue and Foothill Boulevard 5) To minimize the potential interior noise impacts, lots (units) facing Foothill Boulevard should be provided with weather-stripped solid core exterior doors, and exterior wall/roof assemblies should be free of cut outs and openings. C, D, E,F,G 326 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 07-35 DRC2006-00223 -ARBORS AT ROUTE 66, LLC June 27, 2007 Page 8 6) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m and 6 30 a m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. 7) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17 02.120-D, as measured at the properly line The developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as speafied in Development Code Section 17 02.120 Monitoring at other times may be required by the Building Official. Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building Official within 24 hours, however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building Official. If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted 8) The perimeter block wall shall be constructed as early as possible in first phase 9) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 800 p m. and 6.30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a Noise Mitigation Plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes. To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. 6 The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 27TH DAY OF JUNE 2007. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY Pam Stewart, Chairman ATTEST. James R Troyer, AICP, Secretary I, James R Troyer, AICP, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 27th day of June 2007, by the following vote-to-wit AYES COMMISSIONERS J • NOES. COMMISSIONERS ABSENT COMMISSIONERS. C,D,E,F,G 327 • City of Rancho Cucamonga MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM Project File No SUBTT18179 DRC2006-00223, DRC2006-00341, DRC2006-00350, DRC2007-00029, This Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP) has been prepared for use in implementing the mitigation measures identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration fortheabove-listed project. This program has been prepared in compliance with State law to ensure that adopted mitigation measures are implemented (Section 21081.6 of the Public Resources Code) Program Components -This MMP contains the following elements 1. Conditions of approval that act as impact mitigation measures are recorded with the action and the procedure necessary to ensure compliance. The mitigation measure conditions of approval are contained in the adopted Resolution of Approval for the project. 2. A procedure of compliance and verification has been outlined for each action necessary This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported. 3. The MMP has been designed to provide focused, yet flexible guidelines. As monitoring progresses, changes to compliance procedures may be necessary based upon recommendations by those responsible for the program. Program Management -The MMP will be in place through all phases of the project. The project planner, assigned by the Planning Director, shall coordinate enforcement of the MMP The project planner oversees the MMP and reviews the Reporting Forms to ensure they are filled out correctly and proper action is taken on each mitigation Each City department shall ensure compliance of the conditions (mitigation) that relate to that department. Procedures -The following steps will be followed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga A fee covering all costs and expenses, including any consultants' fees, incurred by the City in performing monitoring or reporting programs shall be charged to the applicant 2 A MMP Reporting Form will be prepared for each potentially significant impact and its corresponding mitigation measure identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Checklist, attached hereto This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported All monitoring and reporting documentation will be kept in the project file with the department having the original authority for processing the project Reports will be available from the City upon request at the following address City of Rancho Cucamonga -Lead Agency Planning Department 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 C, D, E,F,G 328 MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM DRC2006-00223, DRC2006-00341, DRC2006-00350, DRC2007-00029, SUBTT18179 Page 2 • 3. Appropriate specialists will be retained if technical expertise beyond the City staff's is needed, as determined by the project planner or responsible City department, to monitor specific mitigation activities and provide appropriate written approvals to the project planner 4. The project planner or responsible City department will approve, by signature and date, the completion of each action item that was identified on the MMP Reporting Form After each measure is verified for compliance, no further action is required for the specific phase of development. 5 All MMP Reporting Forms for an impact issue requiring no further monitoring will be signed off as completed by the project planner or responsible City department at the bottom of the MMP Reporting Form. 6. Unanticipated arcumstances may arise requiring the refinement or addition of mitigation measures. The project planner is responsible for approving any such refinements or additions An MMP Reporting Form will be completed by the project planner or responsible City department and a copy provided to the appropriate design, construction, or operational personnel. 7 The project planner or responsible City department has the authority to stop the work of construction contractors if compliance with any aspects of the MMP is not occurring after written notification has been issued. The project planner or responsible City department also has the authority to hold certificates of occupancies if compliance with a mitigation measure • attached hereto is not occurring The project planner or responsible City department has the authority to hold issuance of a business license until all mitigation measures are implemented 8. Any conditions (mitigation) that require monitoring after project completion shall be the responsibility of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department. The Department shall require the applicant to post any necessary funds (or other forms of guarantee) with the City These funds shall be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measure for the required period of time. 9. In those instances requiring long-term project monitoring, the applicant shall provide the City with a plan for monitoring the mitigation activities at the project site and reporting the monitoring results to the City Said plan shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented The monitoring/reporting plan shall conform to the City's MMP and shall be approved by the Community Development Director or Planning Director prior to the issuance of building permits • C, D, E,F,G 329 • ~"' a H i..~ a z ~:.i ~"~ _~ J Y W 2 U Z 0 H CZ G Q I-- V J J ~D tC d O O L O N ~ r Q N C ~ lC ~ V .Q +~+ Q R Q ~ n rr !'- m N O O O O O N U v 0 M v 0 o m D C N C J ~ zl a ~ »~ ~ cl O ~ ~ > O O ~ N ~ ~ z°, o. W LL v N d ~ a • ~>> • ~; "' i4' a " " ' N N N N N N ,~ ~; a U a a a a ~ C ~ C ~ C ~ C y C N C CO RS Id RS f0 (LS a a a a n. a • o 0 0 0 0 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ > > > > > > ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . , • U U U m U U m o- a ~ o 0 0 ' U U U m m m ~ 'J ~ O O p 0 w+ M "~ V U > ~ p c~U ~ p ~ ~ ~ = Nr'p X T ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ U C C c~ L O S c~ .,_..~~ ~ ~ ,.r ~ O Q~ O Q .`r ~ U "r ~ p N~ C c~ Q ° O -o° O O- i U N ~ a-~~m~~ L O (~ C C ~ ~ >' O ~ U ~ O c o j - L oQ ~ p o ~ o~.n m ~~ N a ~ i U U ~n-o ~ L U tq C U C >' U ~ ~ c~ c~ ~ O ~ ~ ~ cd N ~ ~ ~ ~ O O ~ ~ ~ °'~ ~ m c~ -° ~' ~ oy~ oU c E Q °Q~ ~ o U a ~ o ~ - _ C - ~ ~ ~ U 'Q cSS >, ` L O O ~ E: O ~ U ~ ~ C Q ~ Q U - O ~ ~ CO c ix, ~',+ , CO i C CLS U .~ O ~ - ~ (~ ~ ~ i C C U O C!1 o C O ~ C ~ ~ fn -O ~ ~ ~ Q fn ~ ~ Q N ~ fA O 00 ~ O ~ C L -O fn "° ~ ~ j ~ C C ~ y C~ In > O OU "° U ~ N O OU ~ Cn ~ ~ ~ ~ X ~ C Q j ~ a ° m `-oU U oin ~ c ~,~... ~-a ° ~ _o ~ Quo Q c ~ aAait L.. U ~ L QQO o a-o ~ ~ Q ~ ~ ~ (~ L ~ ~ 0 0 O~ o m ~ p ~ (n "~ ~a a~~ ~~ c ° c o °'~-c~ ~m - ~'~°"U -o~op ~~~~ ~~ °c~~ °'-a ' go~a6i~ ~ ~~a~~~-cca~a ~ ~~o-° ~Q goo `~-~ °° U c o c ~ ~~ o~~°~ o o C~ t Q ~~ »- v i ~ „>~ L c~ a> ~ o ~ Qc a c° o ~ a~ ~ ° a c N ~ ° o ~o o ~ _ _ ° ~ cn ~ c c ~ c f .. a~ w o > ~ ~ ~ ~ o c ca C c O ~ .~ c .c ~ ~ c~ a> o U a> ~ m y `- Q -~Eo`~`~o Q o m U E~ U ca~m~>~>oa~c~c~ a. -o -o a~ a~ o ~U E~~ -°~m ¢ Qa.~ -o ¢ c -~ ~ ¢~ E C,D,E,F,G 330 rn 0 T . . N N N ~t ~ V' ~Y d' ~ V N ' a a a Q Q Q Q Q Q a s °- °- °- °- o o o_ o o °- °' O O O O U U _ U U U O O N ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~: D) i m i ~ ~ C~ C~ C !n C~ C~ O O O N 7 CO C D 7 0 O p D O p ~ N ~ p ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ D U D U ~ U U U • U U U U U U U U U U U . . O O O O O O O O O O O m m m m m m m m m m m m ~ oo c -o c ~ ~ m~o~o - ~ o.- rn ~ o~ •- -a >, c ~c~- -o c o cow c co ~c ~o c~ o ~~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ v~ `~ o o ~-o ~ `~ ~ °' ~ m ~ (A C O (~ fn O- to C D O p ` p ~ >' ~ - 0 O L ~` ~ N (6 0 ~~ .~ O U O O C O ~~ ~ N 0 0 O~ U ~ d d Q C~ Q O O ~~ ~ O 7 `~ ~ C~ ~ -Q ~ O ~ ~ 'p O N ~ .«. ~ ~ OU _ a ~ ~ U ~ N U U ~ N O p ~ p .C Q_ ~ ~ O CO p O N N ~ ~ cLS O) O (n ~ o Cn ~ ~ ~ ~ O C ~ U ~ ~ ~ U N N O ~ ~ ~ ~ C - ~ O C o ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ co N ~ ~ ~ O cn c v> > fl' N ~ c~ ' ~ C O C N ~ ~ M ~ _ ~ ~ C O ~ O 'a ~ ~ C~ ~ X ~ > Q ~ O U 7 ~ d N ~ ~ ~ O ~ ~ ~ m L V ~ O ~ O ~ C ~ O ~ ~ O O ~ ~ c ~ aci ~ ... ~ C m~ c 0 °~ °' ~ c,n °~ o o . ~ o ° ~ o of ~ ao ° ~ ~ -c fl - ~ o ~ 3 c0 C j~ ~ 'O ~ ~ ~ N -p ~ N ~ ~ >. O `- C ~ ~ Q Q '`. _ fn O U C C c O O O ~ ~ 0 0 t~ ~- 7 0~ C i p C ~ U U O c6 ~~ O C~ d' ~ N~ i~ o_ O ~ ~ c~ U o~ (0 p ~> ~ ~ O~ U O ~ N C C U L cq O O O C N O p U ~~ J ~ C O~ O i ~ p~ = O ~ U O C (d U Q U N N C O C O ~~ ~ O D) >' ~ ~ j U U O ~ d ~~ U j _c X N a N j ~ C O C ~ O~~ ~ Q~~ ~ N (~ ~~~ O~ C Q O~ ~' Q tq ~ O y c~ X 'O O N m ~ ~ ~ >+ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O - ( c~ ~ N ~ N - ~ ~ O - U (~ O ~ L ~ O ~ O N ~ ~ C C ~ S ~ L ~ U U -O ~ c~ ~ U ~ ~ ~ RS C ~ > L Q1 p L ~ o_ fn U ~ 'C ~ f ~ ~ CS ~ ~ ~ C Q G 7 ~ .L fn i n O (/) ~ O ~ c~ O O Y a a, O~ ~ ~ O~ O C R ~ Q~ d C C ~ ~ ~~ cd U~ E N m ~_ ~ U ~> O U U c~ ~ ~~ D.. c~ O U (!) O ~ U ~ c~ O ~ >, L O Cn ~ ,.r f U U p Cn ~ Cn c0 7 ~ L ~ N O -6 ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ to U O ~ N O ~ C ~ ~ ~ ~ ^ ^ O ~ O O O U F- ~ ~ R3 ~~ N~ U ~ c`~ L N ~~ F- (~ O ~ N ~ ~ U • O N • C, D, E,F,G 331 r~ • ~ N N N N N N N U U Q a ~ ~ U U U a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a a a a a ~ d ~ • 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 3 3 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a~ ~ m a~ m a~ m a~ > > > > > > > > ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . , O ~ ~ ~ - U U U U U U U U m . . m m m m U ' U U U - fn ~ C p N `- "O O C `- `- O O N N ~ ~ C~ N ~ ~ C O p ~ O L C Y Cn In to O y 7 U N - C ~ O , p 0 .C -? L7) LT ~ C ~ O Ct5 Ll7 cn O ~ p ~ O O - O CSS ~ r '-' - CO C > "p ~ C p > ~ ~ O r Cts _ .~ O = p O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Q i ~ O , ~ ~ U Q ~ ~ ~ ~A O O O ~ O y O U ~ _ _ C ~ C6 ~~ ~ C~ ~ N O O N ~ O cn 3 ~ '- N C O O U O~ C ~~ ~ ~ ~~~ O~ ~ C =~~ U C C ~ U p ~ ~ N +~ ~~po > ~- a~a~o~~nE N (TS .-~ ~ - ~: N "O ~ O p C Q N O cT! C O O N ~ ' 7 ~ ~ ~ U 7 C ~ O p C ~ V ~ O D U C .._ _ (IS U ~~ O N 7 ,-- ..~ p t' to O !A ui to Q O L O' vj >' O ~ 0 U C E: f0 ~ U O C ~ to y~ O N C N ctf C c~ ~ E~ O cis C O~ ~~~ X 0 0 ~ Q U~ ~' N U ~ "O ~_ p L Q N N W~ its Q .. O r ~~ ~~ O~~ O> (~ C O UCr U ~~ > ~ ~~c L ~~~~, ~ Q E ~ ~ E ~E _ ~a~cts° ~ ,' _ _ U~oQ ~ E:~~ E ~ ~ ~ E ~~~ ~ its°' U~QC~ Ucd c~U r '"o~ ~ ~~caQ~~ ~~ U ~~ U L ~; U (~ N~ ~ Q O -p Q O_ U p ~~ ~ p~~~ N ~ p~ (~ L U <"> x ~~ p -p C C i 'O ~ l0Y C~~ -O ~ 7 C C N D O ~ O .-~ U~ ~ O ~ U C U O Q. O Cn y. ~~ d p C 0 ~ U C (0 E ~ _p " i O O-OV O O .F+ `1 lA ~ Ct5 •- C ' CTS N CO O N CIS N N ~ T~ Ct3 C C cis O cis O µ- ~ 03 . ~ Q ~ ,, sp° N ~ .C _ O L p Q ct5 - T~ Ci3 O ~ ~ Q ~ ~ C ~ ~ Q C O ~ ~ ~ O ~ ~ N ~ . O U E ~ ~ ctf ` Y N " Q ~ ~ ~L,,, m 7` Cn 7 p N p Cn O Z~ U p p ~ ~ O Cl5 T C (~ O W N .~~ m -`om -OQm -zT~ -gym ~~sU~ o -- czs ~.a c ~°~~ ~ Q Q ~ ¢ ~~ Q E o~ Q ~~ ¢ ~ 3 ~ m~~ m Q ~ ~~ U ~ ~ °' c~ acs rn O C`7 C,D,E,F,G 332 .. .~ ~ ~ ~ ~. ~. .. ° ° ° ' a a a a a a 0 0 0 0 0 0 L L L L O O O O O O > >> > > > > LL ~~ /ryy lJ~ // 4. // LL ry ~ LL - U U U U U m . - - O O O O m m m m - U U U U U U _ ' -w `~ ~ o c is ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o c ~ o o ~ mo ~ o ~~ ~o O p ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ UO ~ ~ ct5 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Q O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ p Q ~ ~ E m ~ ' ~ °' N C c~ a E ~ 'a C "O i a~w ~ ~ ~ ~~ o"= ~ O U ~_ O fn cil ~ ~ c0 _O C a ~~ C N ~ Q N O p p ~ ~ ~ _ `~- L C ~ F-- C ~ _ O ,~_ U L ~ ~ U ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ y E m C ~ ~ p ~ ~ Q O c0 m O "O `~ O O ~ C ~ O ~~ Q O 7 ~ E~ U O O UJ ~ O- c~ C ~~ i ~ ~ C ~ U ~ c ~ N p p O rq O ~ N L O O _ O p j~ 0~ U p . L -p ~ y p p ~ ~ ~ U D7 ~ ~ ~ C ~ ~ c~ t~ vj C O ~ U ~ O Q +. ~ O ~ O ~ c~ "_ C O ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ ~ O O ,~ ~ _ - - O O ~ c~ ~ j O C ~ N ~ p` C ~ U ~ N O ~ U .C +- O C ~ N co U ~ '~ c~ O ~ C O> cO p Q - L N- _ c~ Q Q) O ~ci3 y y O ~ "'+ Cd C ,~, .C ~O ~- C C~ O~ N N O) O C- ~ ..-. to 0 ~_ S O U ~ ~ "~ O C ~ U O E ~ ~ ~ U~ E E m O~ N> O~~ Q O 7 O ~ ~ ~ E ~ O ' ~~ i ~ ~ ~ O O C ~ O i ~ cts = .O ~ ~ O O~ > C C ~ c~ ~ ~ E: N > ~ c~ i .... O 0 0- O ,,., O 7 N O Q. O ~ N ~ O O ~ ~ O O C in N O O N~- > 0 ~ ~ p ~ C - E: ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - U 0 c~ to ~ ~ O~ Q. O ~ ~~> p O tn~ ~ U p . ~ -~ o_"O U~ O C O p "~ c c 0 QO p..c~ ~L O U O O~ U cn c~ QO O U O~ O ~ ~ ~ Q~ ~ U L `' O C o L W ~ ~ c~ m U ~ -a ~ ~ d co moo..- c ~ U a> ~ v> ~ ~o ~c~- D.. -p Q co o Q c~ -~ >,ino~,~cn.~~ c N ~ N - U `n ° Q- ~ c~~>co~a>~o_o 0 • VJ O d' • C,D,E,F,G 333 • • • • t~ ` ~, v _ ~~ t . ~ vY' C7 C'7 i .~J~ ~ ~ t7 .N ~~ ~s ' +,~t= ~~ . ~ y S~' -1J~ • irt~~~ • • { '~... ' a a o o - Q Q Q ~~~ ~ , 0 a o Q O a o ~ ~:: _~m ~ O O N ~ ' C C C ~% • O O O O ~ U U U r • . ~ U m m ~ O U U U . . • ~ O ~ a. O O O U m U U m m m -o~m ~ ~~ a~~ ~ `oo oc>s>> ~-~a~ ~ ~_ O ~ ~~ C ~ ~ > I~ > Id ~ N a ~ ~_ O O Cis ~ ~ ~ >, N rn w~ C U~~ O ~ ' H O C ~ S O U ` U O "O O ~ O O p O v> C C ~ O~ C ~ O .~ ~ m .~ 0 0 OC d V L ~ 7~~ L N O ~ f - ~ ~ ~ O O) O > ~ C czs ~ ~- ~ p ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ > 'C ctf O O (~ U O ciS Q C ,~„ ,; ~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ C N ~ O O ~, Q 'p ~ - ~ ~ ~' U _° ~ ~ >, ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .C ~ ~ E: c~ p N o co ~ ~ ~ a> cts Cn 'C ~r ; a~ o °' czs - a> o .Q ~ > N _C ~ E Q. U (~ ~~ O - ~ O N L .~~ ~ O E~ O Q U 5 9' a O ~ L C O` O O Q ~ «- ,~ N : ~ O ~ fl.. p O ~ ' "O p ~ ~~ O~~ p~ O 7 ~ E O O B O O N O_ O L N i~ ~ C p N O U~ c0 ~ ~ c~ ~ Q U ~ O '~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ,`~ .>._ N a ~ Q U "p ~ ~ C O C "O >, N E: iQ ~ d N ~ I- i ~> ~ O C ~ O ~ .fl N O 7 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ L _ CIS (~ U E_ ~ U ~ O) a~ ~~ ~ c p c 0 - C O CO O ~ N N O -~ O~ ~ N ~' U E: ~ O O N C ~ O p p U ' ~ p O O C y !n O O U U O N +-- C ~n ~ ~ O. 7 y Its L ZT ,... ,CA U ~ ~ >+ ~ fn U ZT ~ ~ C C ~ ~ O ~ ~ - ~ CTY ~ ~ O .`r U O O O ~ O O ,.-. ~ O ~ O C Its ~ ~ N ~ ~ ~ O O E O Q U O_ U C d ~ • ~ SZ E: C ~ ` ~ N ~ ~ 7 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ `- ~ Q «~' O CZS C Q E O E' CO > ~ ` 3CC ~`> ~ ~ ~ m U . O 0 0 c ~ O` O x O O ~ 6 C ~ ~ ~ N U ~ C O . ~ U O , ~ ~ O- 7 O , + + Q) ~ ~ ~ U (n ~ . . (~ O ~ ~ ~ O O) C U Q O E "O (n O N ~' ~ U ~ -O IOU Cn U U ~ ~ ~ O v> c N N ~ O 'D ~ E ^ ^ ^ ^ O C3 N-~ ~_ to ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O L U LL rA N O O its O _ C.7 d O O C, D, E,F,G 334 • ~ v v v ~ N N N N N ~ ' a a a a U c c c c _~ c ., • O O O O •1_'k O , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Q~ ~ ~ ', ~ • 0 U U U U U m m m m m m m m U U C ~ U ~ O O L ~ O ~ O ~ c0 ~ ~ E ~ ~ ~ O a ~ N ~ ~ ~ '~-~ ~ LO ~ ~ L -O C N Q "O "O to i O '' C O Q N c0 ~ L ~ +-" O F-' ,~ >' O O U in U Z U .. _ (C N O U N >~ m 0 O vJ O 7 +-- ~ O ~~ C N~ O O U p) C ?) ~ O N 7 O 0 _ N U O C3 O cN0 t~ U ~~ -°-~ v~ to O > ' 3L c~ a'o ~ o m ~. ~ N O O (n ~ - ~ p o r O> ~ ~ ' o ' a ~ o a~ o o c a ai ao ~ ~ c c ~ ~ ca Lo - ~ °p ~ C > J ° - N U ~ o ro ~ ~ U N~ Q N 7 ~,~ ~ p C C Q' ~~ O- ~ ~ o mz m Z ~" ~ O ~ N m~ m - O ~ ~ ~ O O -_ O O ~ Q ~ ~ (~ ~ O cC C~ ~ O ~ Q ~ E O > C Z E ~ Z c0 ~ ~ U O ~ ~ rn J C rL--~ O~ ~- >, ,r Q ~ ~ (Sf ` O V~ J O~ U N ,, , ~ ~ N (~ CC ~, i ~ CO ~ O X O C O - C ~ > C to O ` N ~ L ~~ ~ ~ o ~ X O - ~-° ~ m ~ ° ~ ~ n c o c ~~~ >,aW ro m ~~ c m° -° ~ E ro ~c~ ~ ~ ~ ._ a~a~E c N ~ > ~ - o ~o°~ ~N ~ ~ ~ N ~ o ~ ~ Q m ~ c~ ~ c i ~ ca ~ ~ ~ ~ ° a ~ °' a c c a> X " . ~ ~'~ ~ Z N `~ o ~c° > . . ~ c~ ~ ` ~ > ~ C _o E ° ~ L1J - " ° c~ ° o m U .-. O m^cu c~ ~ O C L C O X ~ U~ O ~ O j _~ 'O O -O U V O p T L O O N _ ~ ~ ~ O~ *- 'r L C N C U c0 > C E: ~ L. N ~ O E O M fl O i ` (d ..C ~ O L O~ (n . L ~ ~ ~ E: C~ C O C ~ ~ U c~ ~ O Q N ~ O O ~ ~ U C O "~ c (C E O U . O ~ ~ ~ ~ - Z c~ ~ ~ - Q O LL.I Q1 N O- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ OU C U = L d - ~ ~ ~ L ~ w C U O C U C O ~ ~ ~ C6 ~ O ~ U ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O O ~ ~ ~ ~ U ~ O ~ U cS3 ~ O O v ~ O O U -~ ~ _ ~ ~ ~ U ~ O ~ ~ _ ~ d O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ > O >~ c~ ~ ~> LL ~ ~ ~ O O ~ 0 0` N N E O O ~' ~ O ~~ ~° ~ c~ U O U RS c~ j ~ ~ ~ ~ V O L ~ O -~ N N ~ ~~ O O O >. O ~, ~ ~L O_tJ> ~ O~ O C O C> O J U ~L O~ ~ ~ O_ ~~ U= ~ d O N E d U ~ ~'D~ ~0~ ~ d~ ~ O N Q O H O n- c~ ~~U~ O~mU O Z O O O Ur-c0 O C, D, E,F,G 336 . . N N N N Q ~7 ~t U U U U Q Q Q v> c cn c w c v> c c~ Q c0 Q c~ Q co a CO ~ p • O O O O U O D1L U p ~~ U O ~i N O O N C N N O O O p O p O p D ~ ~ ~ ~ D U D U U • • m m m m U U U . • . . m m m m m m U ~~ C -p (~ ~ N L D -O O y uj O O t Y C~ C N > '~ > N N Lp ~ ~ O O O O O ,~ ~~ C~ O , -d U~ O E: E~ C~ ~ .n 7~ N ~ ~ ~ ` LL ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Cn N ~ o O ~ '`= ~ ?+ ~ ~ O ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ao~ ~ m ~~ axi o ~ ~ > ~ ~ ~~ ~~ a~ o ~ ` 0 ~ Q CO L~~ - ~ ~ O O ' N U ~ ~ - ~ i m O U a~~ O C Cn Uo Q O C O~ C Ua~m ~~-m a~ ~ o ~ j ~ ~ = ~~ o o ca o cn ~~ ~~, o ~c X N ~ ~ p ~ O 00 "'- C O ~ O N > ~ ~~ 'd ~ N E O c~ ~ N Q~ 'O ~- C~ ~ N O cts -O ~ ~ ,,_, U to ~ O U -p '~ ~ O _O ~ O Q ~ ~ L ~ p .: O y u N C ~ ~ O C O ..... N O- ~ C L v~ rn t~> c O ~ ~ O .~ m N ~ ~ 0 N ~ C ~ > ~ N O ~+ U . -~ ~ ~ m° ~ o ro ~ ~ o N ~ ~ ~ ~~ c~ ~ ~ > ~ ao m~ ~ ~ ~ c ~ o ~ ~ O ~ ~ to - _O _ _O ~ O O _ p p v~ ~ C O O 7 O ~ U ~ ca L O C D7U ~ ~ 7 p ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ C ~ U ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ C U O ~ ~ ~ _ L ~ O_ ~ O ~ cts ~ U O m -O (n ~ ~ ~ ~ co ~ m m ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ y Q ~ c0 ~ ~ O O ~ ~ ~ E ~ ~ O ~ ~ ~ "_ O ~ C O ~~ ~ CLS U E: _ O V Q m 0~ ~ O)V _ C ~ ~ p C~ A p r >' O U 0~ N ~~ In J C f~ N C O •-- - Q O (SS 0 O '+ ~ C > N p O O' ~~ C~ L O L~ L ~ i ~ C ~ C c~ ~ O ~ ~ U ~ ~ ~ O L in ~ -p "a N ~ ~ ~ U p CO O 00 ~ ~ ~ D O ~ ~ -O ~ ~ " m '-' ~ O O U O > U ~ O O to to +-~ to - O O ~ ~ ~ ~ > O ~ U O C cd E ~ > ~ N ~ p ~ c ~ ~ °' ~ ~- L ~ N a p N ~ Q. ~ ~ D '~ ~ -~ c~ o ~ ~ m ~ ~ ca ca ~ cn ~ - ~ ~ 'J ~ ~ ~ `~ ~ rom ~ ~ ~ c ° > `~ a~ a o o ca ° ° ~ o c o c ~ ~ °~ o_ ~ o ~ o ~ C a o c o ~ a~ o a~ ~ o ~ ~ U f ~ cn ~ U ~ CO ~ O ~ F- C CD ~ ~ ~ O U L C In n r ~ C .~ lq L (n (A U C~ • ~ • C,D,E,F,G 337 L • • • d' • Q C o ~~ C: y ~ C p o U • ~ • O 0 ~ ~ -C N ~ c0 .~ O -O .~.y to Q C y C ~ O -O ~ O _ O~ C Y C O O C O C ~ ~ ~ ~ U C > O ~ ~ ~ m U O C .`r O -O c~ O >,~O NL- . O Q ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .- Y O~ L ~' ~ d O O "O O ~p ~ ~'~ N ~ N ~ N _ (0 j O -O c0 ~ ~ C O C ~ ~ ,~ ~ O ~ ~ (~ L r O ~ ~• ~ O N O ~ ~ U CSS rn -om~ ~oO ~ O >; Q N ~ N C u7 C Q c~ U in A V O N 00 -O~ U +`~ ~'D ' ' D pp x- 0 0 C L C O -~ ~ O ~ ~ ~ O ~ • ~ c~ m p ~ ~ c~ ~' c c ~-° ~`~i a~n O n o c ~ c ~ ~ ~ ~ c 2 ~ a a o_ ~ E ~. U ~ ~ ro ~ m =' '~'. ~ 'O U U i`" O ~ ~ ~ y O C m O ~ O F~~~ '` O ~ N m : 'O C U N O _ ~ m _ ~ c° m O - m C7 U Y a ~ O =0 r s s O RC N CO V ~ (O I~ ,~ }V O C RS ~}9 d ;( 2 N Q) k^ r F' y" ~ `~ z s r~i._ > ~`-'' a o ~~~ °- Q a ~~ Leo ~v,; ` o E ~ m ~ ~ • ~ ~ .~ L ~ `Q}`. ~ U ~ : . ,,, ~ , ~` C ~ N N m "J Q U m ` ~,, ~, O~° « n ° ~:~~ c O r O ~ a a i ~ ~2'` Q m U p ~~~ c a ~+ t1 O c o "%L: , N C U ~" ~ O 7 C' p C :d' 3 .. o c -~ IJ..° m Z w o U o ~ ~ ~ U ~ n m m o t . E - mss. , W I- ~ O ~ O~ ,C o o U O ~~ ~ a H c O n O ~~, Q m U p W z ~ m 0 " O '~' c a0i m * E a°'i O c O °' O m o a, ~ ,d p O ro ~ a> ' .,~. >` O ~ U N O C ~ O C N C O Q O O ,~ f ~ E E cOa ~ m U r fl ~ w ~ ~ U ',Q, ~ U U m m ~ ,~d p m w 0 0 U ~ U U U m a w N O .~ d .~ Q N Y V d t U 0 A d Y C, D,E,F,G 338 O RESOLUTION NO 07-36 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT DRC2006-00350, A REQUEST TO AMEND THE DEVELOPMENT DISTRICTS MAP FROM LOW RESIDENTIAL (2-4 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO MIXED USE FOR FOUR PARCELS COMPRISING OF APPROXIMATELY 1 04 ACRE OF LAND LOCATED AT RED HILL COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE, AND, ESTABLISH A MASTER PLAN OVERLAY DISTRICT FOR THE SIX PARCELS COMPRISING APPROXIMATELY 10.1 ACRES OF LAND AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND GROVE AVENUE ON THE DEVELOPMENT DISTRICTS MAP IN ACCORDANCE WITH MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 17 20 030, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN. 0207-011-35, 36, 41, 43, 44 AND 45. A. Recitals. 1. Arbors at Route 66, LLC filed an application for Development District Amendment DRC2006-00350, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development District Amendment is referred to as "the application " 2 On June 27, 2007, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application for General Plan Amendment DRC2006-00223 and issued Resolution No. 07-35, recommending to the City Council that the associated General Plan Amendment be approved 3 All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1 This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on June 27, 2007, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to approximately 10 1 acres of land, basically an irregular quadrangle configuration, located at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Grove Avenue and is presently agriculturally and residentially developed The residentially developed portion of said property subject to a Development District Amendment, the four parcels in the easterly 1 04 acre of the subject property, is currently designated Low Residential (2-4 dwelling acres per unit) and is not within the Foothill Boulevard Districts Subarea 1; and b The property to the north of the subject site is designated Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) and is developed with a golf course The property to the west is designated Mixed Use and is within the Foothill Boulevard Districts Subarea 1. The property to the east is designated Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) The property to the south is designated Mixed Use and is within the Foothill Boulevard Districts Subarea 1 C, D, E,F,G 339 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 07-36 DDA DRC2006-00350 -CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA June 27, 2007 Page 2 c. Portions of the City designated for Mixed Use can benefit from the application of a Master Plan Overlay District with a carefully designed development, and d. This Development District Amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development, within the district, in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development; and e This Development District Amendment does promote the goals and objectives of the Land Use Element; and f. This Development District Amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties. 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows. a. That the subject property is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district in terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land use in the surrounding area; and • b. That the proposed amendment would not have significant impacts on the environment nor the surrounding properties; and c. That the proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan 4 Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: a Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA")and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared Thereafter, City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. b. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it, finds (i) that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA, and (ii) that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment The Planning Commission further finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission. Based on these findings, the Planning Commission hereby adopts the Mitigated Negative Declaration C, D, E,F,G 340 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 07-36 DDA DRC2006-00350 -CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA June 27, 2007 • Page 3 c. The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation. The Planning Commission therefore adopts the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project. d. The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring Program and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the Planning Commission's decision is based is the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 477-2750 5 Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below: Environmental Mitigation Air Quality 1) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions. The contractor shall • ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification. 2) Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, the developer shall submit construction plans to City denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low-emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the project Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning staff 3) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted m SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high volume, low-pressure spray. 4) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108 5) All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 401, 402 and 403 Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions: • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads C, D, E,F,G 341 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 07-36 DDA DRC2006-00350 -CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA June 27, 2007 Page 4 • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time. • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods • Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices. • Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction • Suspend grading operations during high winds (i.e ,wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with Rule 403 requirements • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means. 6) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWQCB]) daily to reduce Fine Particulate Matter (PM~o) emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 • 7) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWOCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions. 8) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel-powered equipment where feasible. 9) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. 10) All industrial and commercial facilities shall post signs requiring that trucks shall not be left idling for prolonged periods (i e., in excess of 10 minutes). 11) All industrial and commercial facilities shall designate preferential parking for vanpools 12) All industrial and commeraal site tenants with 50 or more employees shall be required to post both bus and Metrolink schedules in conspicuous areas. 13) All industrial and commercial site tenants with 50 or more employees shall be required to configure their operating schedules around the Metrolink schedule to the extent reasonably feasible. C, D, E,F,G 342 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 07-36 DDA DRC2006-00350 -CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA June 27, 2007 . Page 5 14) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate high-efficiency/low-polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters. 15) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping. 16) Use of Zero-VOC paints (assumes no more than 100 grams/liter of VOC) such as those listed by the SCAQMD of Super-Compliant Architectural Coating Manufacturers B~olog~cal Resources 1) A Tree Removal Permit must be approved that provides for the replacement of the 12 on a 1.1 ratio basis with no fewer than two California Sycamores (Platanus Racemosa) placed in a prominent location in the protect. Culfural Resources 1) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect • or preserve them for study. With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will: • Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value. • Consider establishing provisions to require incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their speaal qualities as a theme or focal point. • Pursue educating the public about the area's archaeological heritage. • Propose mitigation measures and recommend conditions of approval to eliminate adverse project effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, following appropriate CEQA guidelines • Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the project area. Submit one copy of the completed report with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. 2) If any paleontological resource (i.e. plant or animal fossils) are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified paleontologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. The C, D, E,F,G 343 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 07-36 DDA DRC2006-00350 -CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA June 27, 2007 Page 6 • paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i e , paleontological monitoring) that maybe appropriate. Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures • Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing activities. • Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage. If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find. • Prepare, identify, and curate all recovered fossils for documentation in the summary report and transfer to an appropriate depository (i.e., San Bernardino County Museum) • Submit a summary report to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to San Bernardino County Museum. Geology and Soils • 1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PM,o emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 or re-planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible. 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM,o emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM,o emissions from the site during such episodes 4) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions Hydrology and Water Quality Construction Actwities: 1) Prior to issuance of grading permits, the permit applicant shall submit to Building Official for approval, Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SW PPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) C, D, E,F,G 344 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 07-36 DDA DRC2006-00350 -CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA June 27, 2007 Page 7 that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 2) An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included in the Grading Plan, and implemented for the proposed protect that identifies specific measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading. This Erosion Control Plan shall include the following measures at a minimum: a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-site as a result of this protect will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame. 3) During construction, temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris orsedimentfrom the site when there is rainfall or other runoff. 4) During construction, to remove pollutants, street cleaning will be performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from • the site Post- Construction Operational: 5) The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in the Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) prepared by Fuscoe Engineering on July 3, 2006, to reduce pollutants after construction entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 6) Landscaping plans shall include provisions for controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides. Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth. Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permits 7) Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Engineer for approval of a WQMP, including a protect description and identifying BMPs that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable. The WQMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004. 8) Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General C,D,E,F,G 345 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 07-36 DDA DRC2006-00350 -CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA June 27, 2007 Page 8 Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e., a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Building Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit Nose Exterior: 1) Construct a 5-foot high barrier for Lots (Units) 7 through 10 and Lots (Units) 72 through 92 facing Foothill Boulevard and Grove Avenue 2) Construct a 5-foot high second floor balcony noise barrier for Lots (Units) 88 and 89 facing Foothill Boulevard. Interior. 3) Provide a "windows closed" condition requiring a means of mechanical ventilation for all homes. • 4) Provide standard dual-glazed windows with a Sound Transmission Class (STC) rating of 26 or higher for all units and homes facing Grove Avenue and Foothill Boulevard. 5) To minimize the potential interior noise impacts, lots (units) faang • Foothill Boulevard should be provided with weather-stripped solid core exterior doors, and exterior wall/roof assemblies should be free of cut outs and openings. 6) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8'00 p m and 6 30 a m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday 7) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17 02.120-D, as measured at the property line The developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17 02 120. Monitoring at other times may be required by the Building Official Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building Official within 24 hours; however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building Official If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced m intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted 8) The perimeter block wall shall be constructed as early as possible in first phase 9) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 8.00 p m and 6 30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the C, D, E,F,G 346 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 07-36 DDA DRC2006-00350 -CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA June 27, 2007 • Page 9 construction site), then the developer shall prepare a Noise Mitigation Plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 27TH DAY OF JUNE 2007 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY. Pam Stewart, Chairman ATTEST: James R. Troyer, AICP, Secretary I, James R Troyer, AICP, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, • do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 27th day of June 2007, by the following vote-to-wit AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT. COMMISSIONERS • C,D,E,F,G 347 City of Rancho Cucamonga MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM Project File No.: SUBTT18179 DRC2006-00223, DRC2006-00341, DRC2006-00350, DRC2007-00029, This Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP) has been prepared for use in implementing the mitigation measures identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration forthe above-listed project. This program has been prepared in compliance with State law to ensure that adopted mitigation measures are implemented (Section 21081.6 of the Public Resources Code). Program Components -This MMP contains the following elements: Conditions of approval that act as impact mitigation measures are recorded with the action and the procedure necessary to ensure compliance. The mitigation measure conditions of approval are contained in the adopted Resolution of Approval for the project. 2. A procedure of compliance and verification has been outlined for each action necessary. This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported • 3 The MMP has been designed to provide focused, yet flexible guidelines. As monitoring progresses, changes to compliance procedures may be necessary based upon recommendations by those responsible for the program. Program Management -The MMP will be in place through all phases of the project. The project planner, assigned by the Planning Director, shall coordinate enforcement of the MMP. The project planner oversees the MMP and reviews the Reporting Forms to ensure they are filled out correctly and proper action is taken on each mitigation Each City department shall ensure compliance of the conditions (mitigation) that relate to that department Procedures -The following steps will be followed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. A fee covering all costs and expenses, including any consultants' fees, incurred by the City m performing monitoring or reporting programs shall be charged to the applicant. 2. A MMP Reporting Form will be prepared for each potentially significant impact and its corresponding mitigation measure identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Checklist, attached hereto. This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported. All monitoring and reporting documentation will be kept in the project file with the department having the original authority for processing the project Reports will be available from the City upon request at the following address City of Rancho Cucamonga -Lead Agency Planning Department 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 C,D,E,F,G 348 MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM DRC2006-00223, DRC2006-00341, DRC2006-00350, DRC2007-00029, SUBTT18179 Page 2 3. Appropriate specialists will be retained if technical expertise beyond the City staff's is needed, as determined by the protect planner or responsible City department, to monitor specific mitigation activities and provide appropriate written approvals to the protect planner 4 The protect planner or responsible City department will approve, by signature and date, the completion of each action item that was identified on the MMP Reporting Form. After each measure is verified for compliance, no further action is required for the specific phase of development 5. All MMP Reporting Forms for an impact issue requiring no further monitoring will be signed off as completed by the protect planner or responsible City department at the bottom of the MMP Reporting Form 6. Unanticipated circumstances may arise requiring the refinement or addition of mitigation measures. The protect planner is responsible for approving any such refinements or additions. An MMP Reporting Form will be completed by the protect planner or responsible City department and a copy provided to the appropriate design, construction, or operational personnel 7 The protect planner or responsible City department has the authority to stop the work of construction contractors if compliance with any aspects of the MMP is not occurring after written notification has been issued. The protect planner or responsible City department also has the authority to hold certificates of occupanaes if compliance with a mitigation measure . attached hereto is not occurring The project planner or responsible City department has the authority to hold issuance of a business license until all mitigation measures are implemented 8 Any conditions (mitigation) that require monitoring after protect completion shall be the responsibility of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department. The Department shall require the applicant to post any necessary funds (or other forms of guarantee) with the City. These funds shall be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measure for the required period of time 9 In those instances requiring long-term protect monitoring, the applicant shall provide the City with a plan for monitoring the mitigation activities at the protect site and reporting the monitoring results to the City. Said plan shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented. The monitoring/reporting plan shall conform to the City's MMP and shall be approved by the Community Development Director or Planning Director prior to the issuance of building permits. • C, D, E,F,G 349 • • a H N J Q F- Z .:. H ~_ J Y W U C~ _Z O H Z 0 Q H -J U J J Cfl d 7 O ~ O L O N .Q ~ r Q N +-% t0 C ~ lC /V •iL d~ Q O z ++ U d ~O a ^~ W ^~^ ^LL W a N ++ .~ ~~ • x °, k '~ ` ~ v ~ ~ ~, c, N N N N N N && #~u~, ~, `<'• :?-k. w"~t., • yY~ • "1 +~a L~,~~_ ~ U u~ a U a a a a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 . -~, ~ ~ u n o a a n. na a a • 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ ~ ~: ~ ~ ~ ~ U U U m U U z • o m ~ ~ ~ 0 0 0 ' ~ U U U m m m ~`= O C~ C~~ L N~ O O U O "J . O r O ~ ~ C ~ tr W, ~~ ~~ c~ ~ .- ~ O O U~ O U O U U r~ "O . Q~ C ~ +. ~ .-.. U 0 0 L L O L~ d O N ~ X CO C ~ Q i U O O ~~'C ~' " ' U j ~' ~ Q 0 O ~ O Q ~ C O O C L ~ > >. ~ ~ Cn (> 7 a u ~. O N i U ~ ~~°'~ O +.. ~ O~~ O Q a~n-oy~a~ ~ ~ O ~ ~~ N c ~~ c i c ~~" ~ C U C i ~ (~ O) C~ (~ L O ... ~ C C~ N ~ .r ~ ~ O O c~~°~m > Q L ~ _cQ o- o~ocn ~ ~ U ~ (~ ~ U ~ oam ~ Q -~ ~ O U ~ >> U + ~ c0 ~ ~ C ~ O ~ ~ O ~ O ~ L ~ ~ U O ~ ~ C~ ~ ~-~ '` ~ O ~ D7 U ~ ~ U O p i ~ ~ O ~ c~ ~ Q >, d ~ O ~ ,~~ ' ~ L c c~- ~ o a~ ~ c i ~ c _o O ~ `ocnC~ ~ O ~ c ~-o ~ a ~ O ~m O ~-a ~ !n O ~_~ t ' ~, c~ U~ C~~ C ~ (n RS h > ~ cn ~ C o U O O ~ ~ ( U ~ N ' cn -O D) ~ - ~ U r ~ !n Q C ~ cCS ~ , r U n D O _ r > U Q ~ O O L~ U U E O U O C~ o~ ( ) O "~ ~~ O C d ~~ O O • _ C U O ti- i O O E Q O O Q U -~ „ C ~ O' C ~ 7 CSS -O ~ ctS C O O O O p- N ~ ~ U ~ ~_ N ~ cC to ~ 'D ~ a C ~ O ~ O ~ _ C C~ O- ~ C O p~ i C ~ O Q ~ O U ~ ~ O O O O N O U C C L~~ L~ O _~ ~ O~ .r C ,r -O ~ ~ O U O L~ ~~ O U ~ O ~ >~ C to O~ C O ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 0 N O O Y C~ ~_ C ~ ~ (U O T C ~~ 7 ~ fn ~ CO ~ C C ~ - c~ O O Q ~ N U N ~ U ~ O O) ~~ c~ C~ c ~ ~ CSS 0 c~ ~ ~ C Q (n ~ C d' O ~ O O C '~ i C .« ~ to ... O fn C C C O „r ~ Q" ~' 0 > ~ ~ U ~ O N~ ~ L '' U ~ ~ C -~ E: O O O O ~ O C (0 C C O j C 0 0~> O' > 0 0 c~ c~ .~ C .C - 0 0 0) (6 N - p U - 7 U Q ¢ o a~ U E~ U d-O-O a~ m a~ SU E~~ ¢ adc ¢ c ¢m ~ C, D, E,F,G 350 rn 0 T ~ • ~ ~ N N N N ~ d. ~ d' ~ a a U a U a U a Q Q Q Q Q ¢ N Q N ~. a Q a a o 0 U 0 ~ 0 ~ o 2 0 2i O U i i i ~ ~ > N O ~ C to ~ O C~ ° ~ C ~ U C~ ~ o 7 Cp p ° ~ CC N CC > ~ (r p ~ U Q ~ ~ U N • U U U U U U U U U U O ~ ~ m m m m m m m m m m m - ~ ~ ~ -o >. c -a o o ~ ~ o ~ N y ~ Rf c°n N °- ~ T ~ V O O ° ~ m°-, ~ in ~ ° ~ ~ ~ -O O~ O O ` N c~ C~ p c~ O~ O~ U cn d C ~ i~ ~~ N c~ ~X - ° coo cca>a" ~ iao_ a~ a~~ cc~ O N O O ~ to cC U~ ~ C~ N Q ~ cv U~~ ~ U ~~ O c0 Q- '"' ~ fn ~ C~.> ~ ~ U p O_ O_ ~ C`') ~ N .-~ .~ ~ d O Q. O ~ .`-~ ~ U Q 7 ~ Q ~ ~ -° fl- O U ~ to L "O ° O O 7 O O C c~ U ¢ N ~ ~ ~ p ~ ~ O O N~ 7 ~' U ,~ ~ U~ E U ~ N 7 'C U ~ O C N C ,~ ~ O C ~ N ~ ~ c~ N O ~' ~ X N ~ ~ ~ O7 ~ c~ Cn ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Q ~ ~ O ~ ~ (~ _ ~i Q .r ••= O > O (n ~ E N C~ O N ~ - c~ ~ O +.. N i LT O J+ Q ~ O cU4 X ~ ° U ~ N y c6 ~ O O7 ~ c0 ~ ~ L O7 ~ C ~ p ~ ~ o U ~ C L °_ ~ N N O C C '"~ U L E U ~ O~ C U N C> LL. O N N~ yam`., N C A N C Q > U o m~, ~~ o c °~ocin a-°Q c-c~ ~ ~ cNa ~ ,~ ~o ao ~ ~ To E o ~ ~U ~ c°a ~ ~' ~ o~~ EO cn ~ ~ c .-. ~ a. ~c~ cnaXi~ ~c~m cn~~F-U ca~cn ~~cn °~'~°'° ~~°'~ ~~ ~o~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ U CL C6 F- c~ f-- U U ^ ^ ^ • ~ ~ ^ ,F,G 351 • • • f, <-s ~ .. • M c+) C7 ~h d' d' t ~ ~ N d' N N N N C~ C~ U :~s^ - U - Q a 0 o U U U a ~ ~ m w ~ w ~ - ~ -,;' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ cts ,"° ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a~ m m of m m a~ m ai a>i m m a>i a>i ai a>i ', ~~~ ` ,-~~,; ~~ ' ru'~ D • ~ U U U U U U U m - ~: . . m m m m ~ U U U ,~' U vf~ C N a~ ~-a O C ~ ~ o O N m ~ L C~ m-o L C 0 o m O L C ~ ~ ~.... N U 7 U a~= C a~ p 0 m~ ~ p ~ O O (1f LCD O L O tC) O 7 itf r" C > - 'D N C O L ~ (~ O fn O ~ ~ L L (U ~ L O p (~ ~ Q L CO N ~ ~ + O ~ L U .. O ~ ~ Q ~ - fn C2 ..- ~ O O ~ O O >i _ _ ~ ~ - O - O C~ ~ O ct3 N C O p` O N O ~ r N C O p OU ~~~ L~ ~ to C~ ~ C O C C U B 7~ ~ U p T O C O ~ C N N O !n N C ~ ~ ~ N ~ C O~ ~ C _O O ~ ~ U C C ~ ~ U O L~ p N~ C > ~ ~ O D ~~ (~ ~ ~ O ~ O ~ ~ ... O N N 7 ~ N O~ U ~~ ~ ~ ~ O U ~ ~Q U QO(n O p y U C E ~arU C ~ ~ tq to ~ j ~ 7 O C~ ~ C _ ft3 CCf ~ ' , ~ N (Sf C O ~ ~ E L ~ '~ ~ O Q '_' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ,~ ~ ~ a , ~ C .C ~ ~ 0 0 ~ O_ c~ 6 . ~ ~ c0 ~ ~ "O L L O_ 0 0 ~ cn N O _ p) ~ ~ > cts ~ ~ ••- O c~ O O O N .O O cts ~ ~ c~ ~ `~ ~ 7 E: as ~ ' E L ~ O` V j O O_ T ~ .C N E L ~ ~ C E- ~ -_ ~ ~ E O ~ ~ O ~ ~ ~ U _ O ~ ~ ~_ ~ O Ecntn Eo ~ o~L «Y >+ ~ o ~ Q ~ -° cp L n. lA Ep_C ~ _ o'cQ ~ ~U Y U °' a~ `~ of css o Q 0 a v °' ~ ~ ~ c ~ ~ c~C ~ c ~ ~o-a momma L c0 Cc CO O U c6 C Q O c!1 ~ O i o to ca~~ca > U ~ O ~nmo~C L Q .~ G - c~ p ~ c~ °~ O_ co c ro >, L cif O U c a`~ >, ~ O U~ ~ Q`n O U ~ L Q- ~ o O O N ~ ~ O u~ Q O p N ~ a~ ca N o N~ c~ 0 0 iA ~~' ~ ~ o in ~ `'' in ~ y ~ Y _ in ~ m C -p -a ~ ~ ~ a L ~ N ~' ~ U ~ `~ ~ ~ ~ p ~ ~ 6 vi N O "O L ~ "O ~ C N ~ O ~ C N~ _O O ~ C N~~ cn O ~ ~~ C y O O N F L ~ ~ O U V O N O O ~ C p ~ cLi _ >, C cts O ~ O ~ ~ C E O ~ N O _ O a' Q' ~ Q C O O L ~ ~ I- ._ ' (~ O > L ~ U - ~ Q°'a _ Qn. - N ¢E~ - Q N QEo~ ~ - Q~L - O Q°'~ n ~ U cts t ~zT~~ m~ ~ ¢°~oC ~ U ~ CJ ~ oaf °'c~aca rn O (~ C, D, E,F,G 352 . . ~ ~r ~ ~r ~ ~ M C ~ c~~ c) C ~ d' • ° ' a a a s a a 0 0 0 0 0 Q 0 ~ Q a Q a o 0 0 0 0 0 U U U U U [0 • O O O O m m m m ~ n_ a ~ d a. • U U U U U U - N ~ ~ ~ Y ~ ~ ~ ~ C L ~ ~ _ i .- ~ ~~ N U .~_ O to t~ ~ c~ p C a C O~ Q O N m 7 O~~ "- O ~ Q O C U > U Q U ~ C p~ ~ U U O ~~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ O O ~ ~ "J fl- O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ U ~ O ~ ~ C U ~ p- c~ ~ ~ c0 ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ O L a O O _ O O>~ O~ O p~ N Y a.. ~~ V Cp ~ p C ~ ~ ~ .~ ~ ~ _ ~ co c~ vi ~ C O Q ~ ~ ` ~ ~ ~ ~ O C ~ O c~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ C O ~ - C ~ O~ C~ L~~ cn c~ ~ C ~ 7 0 ~ m - C p > U N p ~ »- i C Q O c~ N O U ~ ~ U C .- O C `~ 7 0~ p O O ~ ~ +. O O ~ U C~ p (~ N~ ~ c~ E C O> O fl-- ~ O Q -C cd- . ct3 Q~ ~ O~c6 ~ U . C ""' c0 C~- ~ ~O U~ C O O~ U N ~ O C- ~+- ~ -O d c0 C O p) ~ ~ ct3 O O~ O U ~ D~ ~_ _ E o C° ~~ E E~~ N O O~ U p O~~> L ~ p ~ C O c~ ~ i ~ ~ i N ~ ~ O C ~ O p C "O ~ ~ ~ p) O CO O = p ~ ~ p ~ > N - L O ~ p ~ O O Q O ~ Q ~ N O 7 ~ O O C ~ N O N O C ~ ~ ~ N > _ ~ ~ C Q U- E ~ ~ ~ N ~ i ~ • U N O~ C O N E > ~ ,C O ~ ~ 'O U~ -p O ~ ~ Q O Q cSS L L i U a~ O U O~ ~ p ~~ L L U C~ •~ ~ ww~c~ O U p 0 US~.._. ~ ~ n.c~ ~ O O~ dUmn~ ~ O O O~ i ~ w-aac~oQco _ >, U O L (..) ~ C Q Q~ _'~~O C N ~ O - U RS ~> C p C~ O~ O. O O mo~~o ° ,~o _ -~ o :7 o• d' ~i C,D,E,F,G 353 • J • ,~ ~, _- , • ~ ~ C7 M -==- ~ ~ d' ~ „~=~ °~~ F..' z w• • ,~R - 6 i__ a a o o ~- Q Q Q O Q o Q 0 n. 0 a ~ ~ ~ ~ • 0 0 0 • 0 0 0 0 U U U C y C y C U O ~ O ~ O ~ O ~ - C O D U ~ O D U ~ O ~ U • U m m ~ ~ U U U . . m y m m m ' U U U . _, ~~ °~ E ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ 0 0 0 ~ ~ ca >. ~~ ~~ U~ c ~ ~ oo ~ o~rna> ~ ~ cc O - u~ ~, N ? ~' 'O in ~ co c~ ~ O . O "O O ~ N N p U~ ~ C to U U (U p ~ ~ p " ?+" O C C O~ O ~ y U C ~ ~ ~ 'O O~ U O O O ~ j~ 0 C L > ~ ~ ~ U O O ~ ~ N ~ ~ ~ R ~ ~ m O O ~ C ~ O ~ ~ ~' O ~ C ~ ~ 3 0 O CO C N "O -O ,~ N cSf C ~ U~ p U C O U C ~ 'p ~ ` N p ~ ~>~ ~ ~ Q N O O ~` o O ~ (n ~a U O_ c `o` ~ ~ O ~ -Q ~ o `~ O ~ Q ~ 7 Q 'D ~ .n 0 O E ~ p ~~ ~ o m ~ p ~ ~ m m m y ~ m >, cc n ,~ ~ ~ ~ Q i a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~a> Q N ~ " c~ "a O C ~ ~ 'O ~ v p O ~ ~ U ~' ~ E U ~ 'p " >, O - L cLf -C E CO O cU c0 m " O O C 6 E Q U c~ ~ ~ O O ~ m ~ m ~ ~ j ~ ~ O ~ O O O O o i C m Q ~ O ~ Q ~ ~ c~ ~ , m ~n ~ O 2 O) L (~ m m c m C C N ~ O C ~ p U cn ~ ~ i ,,,, ~ N N~ a M O _ ~ >' ~ >+ ~ - m O "-' ~ O c ~ - _ O m~~ O O ... c »- > m L m c~ ..... N C O -,e »-~ U~ ~ O (~ ~ ~ ~ > L O_ U ~ ~ O~~m N ~ .`r i ~ a~-~~n.~-p -Q ~ C ~ .-. ~c N E - c~ ca a ~~ ~~ L "~~,.,,` ~ arc-pa~~ ~ O N 7 C ~~~~., ~ c~ (~ E v> c~ m f0 (d U m ~ Q (n - p ~ C p C C 7 C O C~ m ~ m ~`~ d - ctS O «S to In U E O O N C C ~O O U !q "p 7 ,r O C O to ~ ~ U U m +~ ~ (A "p ~ Q ~ ~ (~ ~ ~ ~ «- ' OP/ (13 U r ~ >, ~ to U ~ ~ ~ ~ c c a 7 ~ ~ -O ~ ~ - ~ C Q ~ _ ~ ~ m .`~ U ~ `- ~ ~ ~ ~ O m ~ ~ ~ ~ p CO ,~ ~ E O ~ 'O ~ O C (d ~ ~ N 'D ('~ c~ ~ N O E ~ fl- U Q U O X CA Q ~ ~ 7 ~ ~ ~ ~ N Q d ~ C~ C ~ R3 >, m N '=5, ~ ~ m Q U O O c ~ i m (n ~ to 7 C to ~ - ~ O m m m c ~ ~ ` O m U 7 i O C O ~ U p_ p 7 O p ~ O ~ (~ U C Cn ~ ~~ O ~ c~ -p ~ ~ c ~ -~ c -p .,~ Q m E 'D (n O m- ~ U d 'p ctS U (!) U U~ ~ C~ y m c m to O ~ ~ m CO ~ ~ = ~ ~_ to U O L N O ^ • ^ ^ ~ F- ~ ~ ~ ~ LL y O O O ~ Q O1 O C, D, E,F,G 354 Y =~~~ v a ~ a ~ a ~ a ~~,~~. a £.~ s ~~~ Q a a a a c o a Q a a CJ O O O O _- ~ ~ O ~ U N ~ N ~ N ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ U o~ m m m ~~,; s_-~` ~ ~yO~ ~ m {5.. _ 4z~~' ~ur O m O m O m O m ~ ~ O O u , r ~ ~ ~ ~ O7 O C ~ p -O O ~_ _~ O ~ ~ U .fl c0 O O O ~ ~ `O ~ ~ (..> N =r U O U "' O~ O ~ ~ N O C O O O~ p~ O ~ O ~_ ~ ~ >~ L ~~, S O U O~~ ~ L~ p `~ ~ U~ ~ O_ ~ as Q~ ~ N O U~ O O O c0 S~ U Q ~ ao o a~~ Q-c ~ o o c O O_ N ~n o ~ C O ~ > ~ Uoo Eo^m~c m EES~a~o~~o0 O 0 ~m~.E O p i ~ p d n- 7 ~ a~N- U - U ~ ~ ~ L d ~ ~ +~ ~ r.• ~ caN~~~c~~~ U ~ +r E: ~ ~ ~ ~ _~ >.~>-. o Q m cam ~ aE: ~ ~ ° ~~ ~~~ oU o-c~ O in ~ a`~ ~L o o~ c a ~ o ~ ~ U ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .~ Q ~ -- O N c c0 ~ a ~ ~ C CO (n c~ U ~ ~ Q ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ L O ~ ~ ~ ~+ ~ O O ~ > ~ R3 O E V~~ N .~ o~ .~ ~~~ O p O E: O~~ p 0 O O C ~~ O ~- _O o ~ o_ O ~ o L a m ° ~ C c ~ c ~ >. c~ m o ~ ~ ~ ~ Y ~ ~ ~ >_ „ia, ~ U ~o °' g o ~ U ~ .c N o c-cc -aE ~' E °'o ~U E o~ c~ N O C ~ ~ N ~ m-a Y O a' i~ ~ C N ~ ,~ y a= c c~ - ~ O- c ~ a> N O ~ ~ a> »- ~ O ~ E ' O C~ C O ~ , +~ N ~ ~ > ~ 7 N O C ~ C t ~ ~ ~ O ~ i ~ O ~ in - -O « cC ~ ~ "_ ~ ~ C O O ~ _ C ~ N O O O ~ ~ C N ~ ` ~ _ O m ~ ~ O > O , - to cn ~ C C ~ ~ ~ ~ CO O ~ ~ p ~ -p U Cd ~ ~- U Q ~ N O y (~ 'D C ~ O ~ ~ ~ O O ~ ~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ N C C O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ N O r ~ o C" ~ ±• +- m U C E U U L O C (!~ O O~ i U C ~p ,~ O - O L O to CO ~ +">'~ ~ ~ O O) O ~ ~ ~ p ~ L ~ O ~ ~ ~ O U O N ~ Q. O1 p) - O "'~ O -O•-" ~ ~ O O fq N - O ~ ~ ~ U ~ C~CO~a. U U N O) O ~~ C O U X O O ~ ~ ~ c~ ~ C O1C O_'O C ~ O ~ Q ~ ~ O C O ~ ~ ~ C ~~~ ~ ~ c~ ~O O) ~ ~ U fA U i, L - O - fn ~ ~ J U LjJ U O p ~ i >, 7 p ~ ~ C 'p 'C ~ C C ~ > > L > O ~ ~ U ~ ~ 2 ~ f~ CO ~ CLS C O ~ ~ O ~ C N p ~ ~ ~ ~ O) C C U ~ ~ ~ m ~ O ~ Q ~ O OU ~ Q ~ Q ~ C ~ ~ ~ vOi 'O ~ ~ ~ ~ N ~ U cu fl c~ rn > cn U O .. • ~ • CD • C, D, E,F,G 355 • • . ~ ~ v ~ f ~ N N N N N ~ ~ a a a a ~~~ U C C C C ~ ~:: C Cff C~ CLS (i3 ~ C~ d d Q is Q. O O O O O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O O N N Q1 N O N O -~ r~r; O ~1, t per ,~ ,- a' a ~ ~ ~ ~ U U U U U m m m m m m m ' ,~` , m U U ~ ~ ? ~ o o N ~ ~ ~ ~ -~ ~~~ o~ ~ of y, ~ °-~ m`i aoi `mU `m °'~ ~' ° ~~ , c °~ ~Q ~' N oz is ~~ °' o ~ c c ° ° - a~ ~ w w ~ ~ o con a~i ~~ ~U °' U ~~~ °' p ~ o °' ° a vi i i a ~ " oC7 a~ ~~~C7 - o ~~ ~ ~ ~ Q ,,._ O~ O U C to cif ~ N~c~ o n- C~J ~ .C - o ~"~ ~° ~ !1 0 O' N O O 'D C ao c~ v c c~ CSS ~ ~ ib O a~ ~~ ow o~ a~ Z „_, ~ L ,-. ~ d . . Z ~ C c0 = ~~N,--. U m ~ U N ~O_~ j ~~ C C d~~ Q .. ~~ L ~.~ ~ N C C'7 ~ U ~ ~ ~ L o, E ~ Uj !Z "O ~ c ~ ° 'D Q ~ O Z O O O L ~ ~ ~ .-. ~ ~ C Q C ~ -~ O O O` ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ 3 O ~ O LO O i ~ ~ ~ O O ~ LO ~ O~~ O O N~~~ C L O Q~ C O E i •- E: N ~ O "00 to O~ `~ ~ O 0 0 C O X O O O O -~ .O C Cls O_ «. co C U N E: co ~ ~ N ~ 7 O y L_ O C C O -p E 7 _ P V C >' ~ w ~~ ~ 0 0~ ~ O L cC ~~ C ` O _ Q ~ m ~ ~ y ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N C 'O C a N X ~ ~ > ~ ~ Z O C ~ ~ ~, U ~ ,~ ~ C ~ ~ O O co Cd .~ ~ W -O > O cts O ~ •--~ O ~ ~ OU ~ C y O ~ ~ "a ~ ~ ~ ~ O T~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ . O ~ ? `p E O ~ ` U O O ~ L ~ `_~'~~ ` ~ C + °_~U~c~ pQ- .- CJ N UU°' o-p~caE: ' ' L O c°U~ ~ -z~°' C ~ ~ O O W~ O ~ y O CJ lA 'O O ~ SlS ~ p - Q C O OL O ' - O ~ ci3 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ U N ~ O CO ~ W C U C O ~ ~ O O ~ ~ ~ O ~ ~ ~ C ~ ~ J cif N O O ~ O ~ p O N ~ ~ O i ._, ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ cn O ~ cn y cn ~ E U O cts ~ v N iII ~ U U ~ ~ >~ ~ ~ E: y ~ N O O ~ 3 .~_ O „C-O ~ to ~ O O = O U L ~ i ~ O U CT 7 O ` -p ~ LL 7~ ~ .r = E: ~ vpi ~ p E C i~ O~ c~ G N U d ~ L- - U C y O C~ c ~ ~ .~ C 0 7 -~ O >, O >+ {- ~ ~ O_ fn ~ O ct5 O~ O C O J U ~ ~ ~ Y ~ ~ Q ~ U= ~ > O O co d O ~ ~ "O > ~ ~ ~ a ~ O N~ O O O ~ cis ~ ~ U ~ O ~ CO U O Z O p MO U r W O C, D, E,F,G 356 . . v ~ ~ ~ Q N N N N ~ ~ U U U U Q Q Q N N N fA CSS Q ctS Q (~ Q CTS Q O O C ~ • O O O O U p ~ p ~ C ~ C ~ ~ (A O ~ O ~ L p D ~ ~ ~ ~ D U U U • • m m m oD U U U m m m m m m U N =_ ~ L N -O - = ~ to L '- 'T7 O N Uj CTS L N C O >+ C >. C '~ N >+ p "p N ~ ~ >+ O O ~ N ~ ~ O O O O ~ ~ ~~ . --• ~ ` ~~ O F- p O E: ~ c O O O U O C ~ N p Q L O C cTs O Cn ~ L cT3 c 6 ~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ L Q p ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ p N ~ ~ > ~ ~ cT3 ~ tC '~ L L N (~ U _ L~ ~ Q U O C(n _ 0 0 ~~OL~~"p ~ p- ~ U ~~ ~, t~ ~ 7 p L ` (TS O C C U Q Q C O C.!) O p E U -C L ~ ~ O 0~0 ~ ~ N ~ O 0 'D ~ X ~ ~ Q ~ ~ O ~-- C O E C O Q C ~ O~ O p Y O~ ~ ~ tT3 'p (ll rn ~ CpJ N ~ C U ~ ~ ~. O _ O L ~ O > C p Q~ C V 7~ L O O ~ O cTS ~ ~' O N ~ t- O~ X L j p C ~~ - ~ ~ N~ O Q~ O N B C ~ Q p ~ ~ ~ O ~ - ~ N - N (7J ~~ U ~ ~ ~ U C ~ N O S CTS ~ -O ~ ~ C ~ Q ~ O Cn ~ C O p C O~ 0U L y cts L ~~ O C ~ O ~ U O) ~ C ~ (~ p p 0 C O U P N C CLS ~~ C ~ U CTS ~ fn N C U ~~ N cTt ~O 7~ O C_ O p - L ~ Q ~ L C -- ~ +~ CLS U a3 m 'D Q L C O C (TS C N [Q C C~ .•~ ~ ~ ~ N "- O O N ~ C ~ cts Tn (ll y _ ,~ ~ Q cTS ~ O O ~ L ~ ~ O L .~ ~ - ~ U - _ ~ p N fl -p > CTS U ,L-~ O p E >+ ~ O 7~ O - (ll CTS O ~ >, ~ p C c CO CTS p co N> O L - ~ C CTJ J ~ U ~ O L ~ N ~ ~" ~ N C C 00 CSS O O (n p C a 0 ~ ~ O "O .~ O "C t~ ~ O O O ~ ~ N i ~ ~ ~ _ C ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ p O ~ ~ i ~ ~ "- i O ~ ~ L O ,.., O p ~j C y~ U i ~ O Q ~ ~ ~ Q L "O '~ "O ~ '~ C E L i- > ~ p U ~ ~ c0 > ~ ~ p C C o ~ ~ L" ~ ~ CTS CSS O Cn CS ~ C~ 7 ~ ~ m ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O cn c ~ Oc`rz0 ~ 0_ ,~ ~ oc~~o c u ~ o~a~roQ c ~ ~ ooU~ ~ iu ~ c ~ ~ o~r~a~oomLO~m~ ~ o °- ~~ U L m d O ~ {- 7 CD ~~~ ~ O U L ~ C U Cn r "O C U ..O N L Cn ~ Cn ~ N ~ Ctj • O C, D, E,F,G 357 • • • • • C • Q c • o ~~ c ~ ~ C p ~ U . • • CO ~ d. U ~ ~ ~ RS C N to C ~ O -p .-. cn ~ Q O O L _ O N c~ O Q C ~ O ~ C N C - O N ~ Y N C~ p a 0 0~ L 7 0 -a X ~ U C "-' O~ O C (~ O >.~ O OL- ~ .~-J C Q ~ O ~ a C f0 ~ ~ ~ ~ O "" ,~ ~~ 7 c~ C • f~ C ~ ~ O C ,~ O~ _ ~ h O~ N~ L O O O~ >, Q O O C fn O a'p x C N U~ to > ~ ~ c~ O O Z ~- O 00 »-~-p"O U ~'O ~ ~ (/) p p L c0 p ~ c-CO L ~n~a~~~ca a" L O ~ ~ ~ ~ O' C C a> a~ 2 t ~ c~~ a~~~ a ro E ~ * ~ a u .5; ~ ~ , a ' ' ~ 'O U •_ p m ~ N « -~.;',- ~ , "O ~ C ~ U ~ O N ~ N O O ~ .' , m C7 U Y a ~ N_ ''~? ~ -o O -o O 'o O o ~ °' ~ U Y O +=~ . L L L y L y a ~ O > O ro °C' ~ ~ ~ in ¢ ~ U .10 ~ , `~~ ~: N Ch V' ~ CD I~ yY~'Y~ s C +¢ , ~ ~~ * r ~Ti" ~ ~ _ ~ ;~~ 7 ~~~~5 > UJ 6xs ;~ ~' O to o ~ C~. a °~ Q a ate' a ~ a~ m ~, _ E ro ` b~+ ""_ 0 4J E ~~ ~ ~ U ~ 7 d ~ Y ~ z~ Q U '~~ N m ~`A ~ C L (4 N ~ O O a. cn {„w, {„ `'JW3q ~~ 1 1 , 1 p = Q m U t c a~ ~v. o ~ d' ,~ ~ ° 2 °~a ' p C ~ ~° 3 ~ c o c s.~ o c U O j ~ 'may L m (, o > o L N a E m E '~.. w I- 3' o io ., ~ ~"" .r O ~ `o, ~ ~ H C O d O ~~~ Q m U p w ~~ a~ a~ c a> a~ O O p o C N O C N a N c N m O~ C ~ O m ~ m m ' ° o i d N p o o O is ~ ro w o -o a ~ ,~ c ~ ~ ~ _ ~ O a ro ;Q E ro °' m U t C o a. w ~ ~ U Q U w y ~ o ~ O . ~ U U m d u= y ~f p n- w 0 0 U ~ U U U m m ~ C O Q N Y U d t U O ~+ d Y C, D,E,F,G 358 O RESOLUTION NO 07-37 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DRC2007-00029, A REQUEST TO CHANGE THE BEAR GULCH MIXED-USE AREA TABLE CONTAINED IN MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 17.32 020 C 3 TO EXPAND THE RANGE OF DEVELOPMENT IN THE RESIDENTIAL CLASSIFICATION TO 87 PERCENT AND TO ADD THE "MOST CASE" COLUMN FOUND IN THE CORRESPONDING GENERAL PLAN TABLE III-7, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF. A. Recitals 1 The City of Rancho Cucamonga filed an application for Development Code Amendment DRC2007-00029, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development Code Amendment is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 27th day of June 2007, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows. 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on June 27, 2007, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to property located within the City, and b. The proposed amendment will not have a significant impact on the environment. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. This Development Code Amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development, within the district, in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development, and b. This Development Code Amendment does promote the goals and objectives of the Development Code, and c The proposed Development Code Amendment will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity, and C, D, E,F,G 359 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 07-37 DRC2007-00029 -ARBORS AT ROUTE 66, LLC June 27, 2007 Page 2 d The subtect application is consistent with the obtectives the Development Code, and e The proposed Development Code Amendment is in conformance with the Genera- Plan. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the protect will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows• a Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the protect. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the protect would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. b. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it, finds. (i) that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared incompliance with CEQA, and (ii) that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the protect will have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission further finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent tudgment and analysis of the Planning Commission Based on these findings, the Planning Commission hereby adopts the Mitigated Negative Declaration c. The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the protect that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081 6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during protect implementation. The Planning Commission therefore adopts the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the protect. d The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring Program and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the Planning Commission's decision is based is the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 477-2750 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subtect to each and every condition set forth below Environmental Mitigation Air Quality 1) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions. The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications. Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification C,D,E,F,G 360 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 07-37 DRC2007-00029 -ARBORS AT ROUTE 66, LLC June 27, 2007 Page 3 2) Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, the developer shall submit construction plans to City denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low- emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the project. Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning staff. 3) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113 Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high volume, low-pressure spray 4) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108 5) All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 401, 402 and 403. Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions: • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads. • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time. • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods. • Dispose of surplus excavated material m accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices • Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction • Suspend grading operations during high winds (i e , wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with Rule 403 requirements • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means 6) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWQCB]) dailyto reduce Fine Particulate Matter (PM,o) emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 7) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RW QCB) shall be applied • to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions C, D, E,F,G 361 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 07-37 DRC2007-00029 -ARBORS AT ROUTE 66, LLC June 27, 2007 Page 4 i 8) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel-powered equipment where feasible 9) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. 10) All industrial and commercial facilities shall post signs requiring that trucks shall not be left idling for prolonged periods (i e , in excess of 10 minutes). 11) All industrial and commercial facilities shall designate preferential parking for vanpools. 12) All industrial and commercial site tenants with 50 or more employees shall be required to post both bus and Metrolink schedules m conspicuous areas. 13) All industrial and commercial site tenants with 50 or more employees shall be required to configure their operating schedules around the Metrolink schedule to the extent reasonably feasible 14) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate high- efficiency/low-polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters. 15) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping 16) Use of Zero-VOC paints (assumes no more than 100 grams/liter of VOC) such • as those listed by the SCAOMD of Super-Compliant Architectural Coating Manufacturers. B~o/ogical Resources 1) A Tree Removal Permit must be approved that provides for the replacement of the 12 on a 1:1 ratio basis with no fewer than two California Sycamores (Platanus Racemosa) placed in a prominent location in the project. Cultural Resources 1) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value. Consider establishing provisions to require incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point. • Pursue educating the public about the area's archaeological heritage. C, D, E,F,G 362 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 07-37 DRC2007-00029 -ARBORS AT ROUTE 66, LLC June 27, 2007 Page 5 Propose mitigation measures and recommend conditions of approval to eliminate adverse project effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, following appropriate CEQA guidelines. • Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the project area. Submit one copy of the completed report with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving 2) If any paleontological resource (i.e. plant or animal fossils) are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified paleontologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i e., paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate. Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures • Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing activities • Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage. If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find. • Prepare, identify, and curate all recovered fossils for documentation m the summary report and transfer to an appropriate depository (i.e., San Bernardino County Museum) • Submit a summary report to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to San Bernardino County Museum. Geology and Sods 1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWOCB) daily to reduce PM,o emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 or re-planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM,o emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. • 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM,o emissions from the site during such episodes C, D, E,F,G 363 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 07-37 DRC2007-00029 -ARBORS AT ROUTE 66, LLC June 27, 2007 Page 6 i 4) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RW OCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions. Hydrology and Water Quality Construction Actwit~es: 1) Prior to issuance of grading permits, the permit applicant shall submit to Building Official for approval, Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) speafically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 2) An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included in the Grading Plan, and implemented for the proposed protect that identifies specific measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading. This Erosion Control Plan shall include the following measures at a minimum: a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-site as a result of this protect will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame 3) During construction, temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff 4) During construction, to remove pollutants, street cleaning will be performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site Post- Construction Operational 5) The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in the Water Quality Management Plan (WOMP) prepared by Fuscoe Engineering on July 3, 2006, to reduce pollutants after construction entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 6) Landscaping plans shall include provisions for controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides. Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permits 7) Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit to the City • Engineer for approval of a W OMP, including a protect description and identifying BMPs that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system C, D, E,F,G 364 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 07-37 DRC2007-00029 -ARBORS AT ROUTE 66, LLC June 27, 2007 • Page 7 to the maximum extent practicable. The WQMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004. 8) Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (i e., a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Building Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit Norse Exterior. 1) Construct a 5-foot high barrier for Lots (Units) 7 through 10 and Lots (Units) 72 through 92 facing Foothill Boulevard and Grove Avenue 2) Construct a 5-foot high second floor balcony noise barrier for Lots (Units) 88 and 89 facing Foothill Boulevard. Interior 3) Provide a "windows closed" condition requiring a means of mechanical ventilation for all homes. 4) Provide standard dual-glazed windows with a Sound Transmission Class (STC) rating of 26 or higher for all units and homes facing Grove Avenue and Foothill Boulevard 5) To minimize the potential interior noise impacts, lots (units) facing Foothill Boulevard should be provided with weather-stripped solid core exterior doors, and exterior wall/roof assemblies should be free of cut outs and openings 6) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday 7) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17 02 120-D, as measured at the property line. The developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120 Monitoring at other times may be required by the Building Official Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building Official within 24 hours, however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building Official If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted. 8) The perimeter block wall shall be constructed as early as possible in first phase C,D,E,F,G 365 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 07-37 DRC2007-00029 -ARBORS AT ROUTE 66, LLC June 27, 2007 Page 8 9) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p m. and 6.30 a.m on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a Noise Mitigation Plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 27TH DAY OF JUNE 2007 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY Pam Stewart, Chairman ATTEST• • James R. Troyer, AICP, Secretary • I, James R Troyer, AICP, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 27th day of June 2007, by the following vote-to-wit• AYES' COMMISSIONERS. NOES COMMISSIONERS. ABSENT• COMMISSIONERS. • C, D, E,F,G 366 • City of Rancho Cucamonga MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM Project File No.: DRC2006-00223, DRC2006-00341, DRC2006-00350, DRC2007-00029, SUBTT18179 This Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP) has been prepared for use in implementing the mitigation measures identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration fortheabove-listed project. This program has been prepared in compliance with State law to ensure that adopted mitigation measures are implemented (Section 21081 6 of the Public Resources Code). Program Components -This MMP contains the following elements Conditions of approval that act as impact mitigation measures are recorded with the action and the procedure necessary to ensure compliance The mitigation measure conditions of approval are contained in the adopted Resolution of Approval for the project. 2. A procedure of compliance and verification has been outlined for each action necessary. This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported w 3. The MMP has been designed to provide focused, yet flexible guidelines. As monitoring progresses, changes to compliance procedures may be necessary based upon recommendations by those responsible for the program Program Management -The MMP will be in place through all phases of the project The project planner, assigned by the Planning Director, shall coordinate enforcement of the MMP. The project planner oversees the MMP and reviews the Reporting Forms to ensure they are filled out correctly and proper action is taken on each mitigation. Each City department shall ensure compliance of the conditions (mitigation) that relate to that department Procedures -The following steps will be followed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 1. A fee covering all costs and expenses, including any consultants' fees, incurred by the City in performing monitoring or reporting programs shall be charged to the applicant 2 A MMP Reporting Form will be prepared for each potentially significant impact and its corresponding mitigation measure identified m the Mitigation Monitoring Checklist, attached hereto This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported. All monitoring and reporting documentation will be kept in the project file with the department having the original authority for processing the project Reports will be available from the City upon request at the following address. City of Rancho Cucamonga -Lead Agency Planning Department 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 C, D, E,F,G 367 MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM DRC2006-00223, DRC2006-00341, DRC2006-00350, DRC2007-00029, SUBTT18179 Page 2 • 3. Appropriate specialists will be retained if technical expertise beyond the City staff's is needed, as determined by the project planner or responsible City department, to monitor specific mitigation activities and provide appropriate written approvals to the project planner 4. The project planner or responsible City department will approve, by signature and date, the completion of each action item that was identified on the MMP Reporting Form. After each measure is verified for compliance, no further action is required for the specific phase of development 5. All MMP Reporting Forms for an impact issue requiring no further monitoring will be signed off as completed by the project planner or responsible City department at the bottom of the MMP Reporting Form 6. Unanticipated circumstances may arise requiring the refinement or addition of mitigation measures The project planner is responsible for approving any such refinements or additions An MMP Reporting Form will be completed by the project planner or responsible City department and a copy provided to the appropriate design, construction, or operational personnel 7 The project planner or responsible City department has the authority to stop the work of construction contractors if compliance with any aspects of the MMP is not occurring after written notification has been issued. The project planner or responsible City department also has the authority to hold certificates of occupancies if compliance with a mitigation measure attached hereto is not occurring The project planner or responsible City department has the authority to hold issuance of a business license until all mitigation measures are implemented. 8 Any conditions (mitigation) that require monitoring after project completion shall be the responsibility of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department. The Department shall require the applicant to post any necessary funds (or other forms of guarantee) with the City These funds shall be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measure for the required period of time. 9. In those instances requiring long-term project monitoring, the applicant shall provide the City with a plan for monitoring the mitigation activities at the project site and reporting the monitoring results to the City. Said plan shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented The monitoring/reporting plan shall conform to the City's MMP and shall be approved by the Community Development Director or Planning Director prior to the issuance of building permits C, D, E,F,G 368 • • Q J H Z ~:.i ~_ J Y W U Z_ Z O ~Q _V F- G U J J m GO d O ~ O i O O N ~ r Q N ++ l4 C ~ V .Q +~+ Q ~ Q ~ r O ~r m N a~ N O O O ti O O N U 0 M 0 .;, ^I .r r- ca ch ~ O O ,o^ U W O ~ O O ~ N ~ ~ ^ ~ Q O ~- z ~- d ~ _ ~ LL +~,, U (/1 ~ ~ a _`„ _~~ ~~~ _ - s ~ ~ v ~r {` d„. N N N N N N ~'" { ~. ~' ~~' 1 ~`~.+ a U a a a a ~., ;.f ,,, ~ C ~ C ~ ~ ~ O ., a Q a a ~ ~ . ~;'' 0 0 0 0 0 0 o m a~ a~ a~ a~ J- ;~Y ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~''~ ~;,f ~.-'~ w ' ` ,: . ~, . ~ ' O u ;- .: m ~';', U U U m m m O ~ C ~ L N "d O~ U O ~= ~ O O ~ ~ O O O O ~' ~ ~ . U U> ~ O cd U ~ p ~ p ~ ~ O r -p x T ~ N ~ ~ O N ~ ~ U U (~ ~ ~ '~"' ~ ~ Q ~ ~ Q ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ L ~ U p O ~ a~°- ~~a~ E ~- ~ o ~_ ~o ro° ~ _ ~ a ~ (~ ~~ ° ~ ~,;- o Cow°°- ~ w o_ ~ C ~ m Low OQ~ Q ° -o w ° ~ ° ~ O ~~ o p ~ O a~ U C L~ w :. O ~~ C U C ~' ~ C C y O to ~ C~ c~ L O ~ "' ~ «3 N ~ ~ ~ C ~ O C O _ _ cG 0 0 0_ > ~ C Q O- O H O v> ° c N Q ~ ~ U ~ U ca ° a> C m L L Q_ j N O ~ L ~ °L^ o ~ ~ m ..r "p ~~~ ~ ~ U a~ - (./) Q ~ O OU O C O) ~ - O N ~ U L c0 ~ O ~ > 7 L O O ~ ~ ~ Q- ~ ~ O ' s. ` CO i C C9 U _ w~~~ C O C , C ~ U U C C O (n Q _ ~ C y p ~ -p O C Q O ~~ ~ ~ N~ ~ ~ N p ~~~ C ~~ ~ i ~ j~ ~ ~, C ~ fn N N > O O O "C3 U ~ N O ~ "-' Q ~ ~ X r C Q > OU ~ ~ U ~ ~ r > C ~ a~ c~ ~ c a ° m ~~U ~ , N , p ~ O U E O ~ ~ c cn~ ~ ~ L ~ ~~ ~ ~ ° ~ a° Q ~ c ° ro 60 o Qa~ o ~~ ° ° o o O ~ ~: U L ~~ mQ ~p 6c ~ ~ ~ ' N ~ L 7 ~ O N ~ O" "O ~ O ~ "6 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O c0 ~ ~ "O O p ~ N ~ cn ~ ~ ~ L 3 co ~ ~ ~«- _ cC O O ~ ~ ~ O O ~ y ~ ~`~, ' ~~a, N U U C U C 7 O~ C~ ~ N to .... C }' 'p y C~ ~~ O O N ~ ~ ~ V U O ~ C~~ fn U ~ (n U A 7 _ O i r L L ~ -C ~ ~ ~ U ~ C U ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ _ O ~ .~ C ~? c~ O ~ O C~ C~~ c~ 7 0) C c ~ c~ E O O O > -C C Q ' N~ O O ~ ~ N O O O ~ ~_ in _c C iq V to c~ N O Q. O Q y .. O D ~ U ~ y '"'' ° ~4 Q E O O O O Q o m U E~ U ~~~~~ 6> O N RS cSS ~~~ o o a> SU E~~ -~~ m Q o_~~ p Q c ~ U Q~ S C, D, E,F,G 369 rn 0 . . v ~ ~r ~ N N N V ~ d' ~ ~ d' ~t N ' a a a Q Q Q Q ~ Q a s c c c s= c c °- °- °- °- o o ~ o o Q °- O O O O U U U U U O O >i ~ ~ ~ ~ m ? ~ ,i., 01 > Q) ~ ~ ~ N O ~ O C~ C~ C N C~ C~ O ~ O N N N 7 ~ ~ ~ 7 0 7 p D 7 0 D O ~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ D U D U D U U U • U U U U U U U U U U U O O O O O O O O O O O m m m m m m m m m m m m O c~ -a U m 0 -L O ~ L ~~>•c C L -a c o ~ c ~~ ~ O O 'O ~ L L 7 ~ ~ O ~ O 6 c0 C O ~ C ~~ U O N U O ~ O Cn "p O ~ C O ~ N (~ N ~ 0 Q L •' L .~ ~ O ~° C O O _ L ~ CO ~ Q ~ "" ~ _ O L ~ L O .~ ~ ~ .r cO j N cOJ 0 0 ~ 'a ~ (n O ~, U ~ Q C ~ O V CO O~ N ~ ~_ ~ c0 N O ~ "O O ~ ... ~ _~ ~ ~ ~ > O U > O ~ U ~ N O O L Q O CO L ~ O CO ~ O L U c0 ` ~ ~ (n ~ o ~ j ~ > ~ ~ O C . , - ~ U ~ ~ a . ~ c N N N O O N ~ L ` ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ U >, ~ ~ ... O -Q ~ L O L N ~ . ~ ~ ~ O ~ ~ -O O N CO j ~ c ~ ~ CO O ~ ~ C ~ O ~ L L ~ a" O ~ ~ C.4 - C !n CO C c0 ~ ~ ~ C ` ~ ~ ~ >+ C ~ C O C 7 E~ ~ ~ ` ~ O ~ C ~ ~ ~_ O V c0 O C ~ > p -p O~ c0 ~ O Q O .~ r Q t0 L fl- ~ 0 U (~ ° C X > O 0 0 O N- 0) ~ i~ c ~ O c " N O i0 ~ 6 ~ >+ d- p °- O` C~ c0 a 0 p p " cti ~ j ~ p ~' ~ C C _~ N ~ m a> ~ w~ O c0 ~ Q-oc°, ~ v ~ ° °a°i ° a~ ~ a~~ N Ear ° c0 U ~ ~ ~v ~~0 to ~ "-' ~°-~v~ U ~~ c ~ ~ ocOfl- ' ~ o ° m m i0 c .«. ~ ° ~ U ~~ ° = ° ° o ~~~ c> ~ o . a> c ~ ~Q N a c c c0 o ... c a`~ a c a,a- ~ >, c ~ ~ >> (O U ~_ c0 ~ Q c a ~ +U-, N y (~ Sxm 'O O > ~ _C L C ~mc~U Cn ~ (O Cn ~ ~ (O ~ C (n o ~ U O cca~ O ~ 4- O_ C U -~ O CO X -O O O O) _ > ~ ~ ~ >, C (O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O1 ~ O E: ~ Y - (~ ~ ~ L ~ ~ i~ _ E: ~ N ' C Q O _ U iS O ~ ~ ~ ~ N O ~~ U C i . (6 _ y (~ L E U Q 'D O CO ~ C U L m C ~ to C C ~ -_ ( O -c '- o . r ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ L O Q1 O N -p ~ Q O CO O ~ ~ O Q. O ~ m ~ ~ Q ~ Y O C~ > N > LL U _ ~ Cn ~ ~ , ` ~ ~ O Cn ~ ~ , ~ U C 7 - U O c0 ~ c0 d L ~ ~ c0 U ~ O UJ N ~ ~ V ~ 0 c0 N ~ >, O p (n ~ ~ F- U O (~ Cn ~ UJ c0 7 ~ ~ cn ~ O ~ ~ ~ p ~ ~ U' ~ ~ O O U C _ ~ ~ O U > O -O N~ O C N • O • N • C, D, E,F,G 370 • • a,~~ ~.~ ~ N N N N N N N ' C~~; ., a~~~, i' • M,1, ~~ Y 31" s ,f:, Q U a o o U U U ~' ;,~. ~~~- U a ~;-~ a a Q ~ Q a . o 0 0 0 0 0 0 -- 0 ~ ~ ; ,,;;~~ ~ .z,, ~~ :. ~~ r ~= o ~~~~~ ~ ~ ~ U ~,, U U U U U U U "~ m - „`, ~ ~ ~~~ -= 4 ' m ~ U ~ U m U O m O m O m ~'~~~ ~• 9 a- U I ~g ~ "O C O O ~ "O O C ~~ O 0 0 "" O tT y L C O "p L C 0 0~ O L C ' CA N~ .--~ N N 7 U ~ N- C E O ~~° L a» ~ o ~ o~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ c ao L o~ ro o ~ a~ ~ aUi o=_ fn O ~ L L L~ O L QL L 3 L U - ~ Q~ N O~ 0 0~ _ C O~ N C L L ~ T O C O O U O~ C ~ O L °~ Cts ~ Q ~ ~ ' C~~ ~ ° Y C U C ~ ~ ~ ~ V _ ~ ~ 7 O CA O ~= U r L ~ O C ~ ~ ~ '- ~ C N O O U U C ~ p N Q ~ ~ ~ O U C C U o U O O~ ~ > (0 ~ O O ~ ~ U CO ~ -° ~ . . cC N U _. o cn U -o of c ~ in w ai i ~ in Q O U cn L ~ , , O U U a ~ o ~ ~ ° ~ U 3 U c E its U .- ..-. ~ U ~ C to Cn ~ ° (n ~ N U ~ Ctf E C0 0 Cif C O ~ ~ E L ~ ~ ~ ~ G ~ U 7 N ~ L O ~ .U.. m ~ ~ ~ N ~ ~ L ..-~ E c ~ ° ~ ~ _O C ~ «s ~ ~ c~ Q U 6y- ~ i ~L U i C OcL Q. ° N N EL ~L- C~ Q. ~ fA ~~ E ~ ctf ~~~ L O C ~ U '- c C O !n C - ... U O L L N L S. CSf ~-- U~ C U CO C U O~ i Q ~+ ~ C ~ Cn U _ ~~ O N T O L U ° C " - a ~~ ~ Q N E O ~ ~ C w . O - ''= U O- U U ttf O ~~ U x ~ ZT U~~ C " - U U O~ O C "O p Q O O .... O ~ ~ O Q. U > U ~ O C C~ O ~- O ~ ' ~ ~ i O O " N ~ U -aY m p p ~ CY C ~~ U c U~ ° ~ c~ ~ U ~ > O (n O ~ o EL ° U ~ d ~ cn of UY its ca o U ~ o U a~ - ° U - o ° o a~ ~ o~ ~ a~-a ~ °~ ~ ~ ~- ~ N O ~ m CL' ~ ~ in zT v in ~ in ~ Y O E i E ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ -p ~ ~ -p ~ ~ N ~ ~ U o ~ f vi N p > ~ ~ -p _` O O N "p ~ "O ~ ~~~~ v> O O i C U O N N ~- L O N O O ~ O O O O~ N C O ~ ~ , O O C O - ~ ~ N - N - O O - O Q O - ZT ~ - tS N to ~ U N O ~ F~ its , ~ C~ > t n L c ~- U ~ i _ Q°'~ _ Qa QED _ QE:o~ _ Q~L _ C~3 ~mCn~ m Q°~~ U af°'CuaCif 0 C7 C, D, E,F,G 371 . . . ~ ~ ~ v v co r~ c~ co co v . - ' a a a s a a 0 0 0 0 0 0 Q a Q Q Q Q 0 0 o a o 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ > > U U U U U m - O O O O • m m m m - U U U U U U S U N ~ f~ c ~ ~ O C U a~ ~ O~ O~ a C E O ~ O O m O Q O ~ ~,~~ ~ ~ ~ oU ~ c E ~ ° a~ E o-+ ~~~ O to - -~0_' ~~ a~ ~ oar o ~ "6 (~ comQp`m N C Q N ''~°p~ooE o--a ~ O~ O p~ p Cho O~ '-~ ~ O ~~(an, '~" E:~c-o~L ~ L ~ ~m~E~~o O~ O _O ~ O' ~ 'a O O - L ~ co O ctS ~ ~ N O_ __ L ~ - - ~ N U •-~ '~ O~~ U ~ c0 p C Q ~ R3 ~ C O~ Q O Q`~ ~ v> ~ m ~ O .-• ~ L ~ p ~ .Q O 'O C Q ~ i~ ~ O O U Q~ rn ~~ Q Q . N~ Q~ vii C V O cC6 U .- 0~ Q~ L~ X 0 0 ~ ~~ d O 7 y- ~~ U~ O L~ U~ Q p ~~ ~~~ O ~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ Q ~ O O C > ~ O ~ ~ + - 'D ~ U ~ ~ ~ Y ~ - O C >' ~ ~ L ~-.. ~ ~ _ ~ c0 cd O O N C O Q ~ E' ~ ~ - O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O c ~ ~ t~ -p - ~ C N p ~ - _7 7 p O~ .C ~~ cn C 0 0 ~ - ~ O > U p C C ~ p C O cn ~ ~ U~ ~ N ~ O p 0~ 0 0 0 O O. ''' N p ,,,., +.. +_' - O E C N • O > p X 0 cd ~ Q. - ~ U~ Q O ctf Q ~ O m co N~ O ~ "~ c~ C m 0 ~~ O ~ ~ U~ c~ C ~ O ~ O O - ~ j j Q~ ~ ~ i O U ~ O7 N C B c~ ~ O O 'O ~ E O c ~ U ~ ~ E E ~ O) ~ j c6 n O ~ ~ U O ~ ~ Q ~ _ ~ ~ C O c~ ~ L~~ L O O C O C A O C "O ~~~ D7 O p N= O~ ~ p~~ w O ~ ~ Q ~ N j ~ p ~ ~ in ~ CO E: p ~ ~ ~ > _ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ E: N y ~ ~ E: U cn O _C > ~ ~ ~ Q "O ~ ~ Q O Q c~ ~ ~ Q O N U O -Q O ~ ~ ~ O C W ~ ~ c~ U C "O ~ W co W ~ ~ Q ~ 4.. ~ Q O O Q c~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ U ~ O Q ~ O ~~> C p c0 O~ Q p ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ~ ~ ~ ~ Q ~ ~ E c0 ~ ~ o • C, D, E,F,G 372 . . ~f' N N N N • °i+. ~ Q ,. a a a a ,. - - Q a a a ~ ~ ~ ~, _ C~ j C !~~"a:~ O N O N N O O N O OU W T W W 'tti~ • ' U U U '~` m m m m m J ~ m m m m ~ o ~ c E?'ia ago ~ p ~ L c_ ~ o~ o~ ~o~~ ~~ ~ ~ O "O U -O ~ 7 ~ ~ ~ m O N ~~ o N ~ ~ C~ .-. U~ ~ ~ O U U ~' 7~ Q V N~ - C E: ~ C- U- p) N O C O O ~ U~ ~~ ~ >~ U p (n p ~~ O ~ of Q~ .~ O L U O N~ O p ~ Q O O Q- U +L- Q- C U 0 0~ O_ ~ y 0 L C p ~ j C~ ~ p ~ U U >~ m C C E O .~ ..., ~ c~ N E~~~ O X 0 0 L U O - _ ~ ~ .~ ~ y ~ ~ C O ,_ E a3 ~ O ~ > j Q Q d ~ ? ~ _ _ U ~ O O ~ ~ U ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ ~ .--~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~ aE a° ~~ ~~cij N c Q~~ ~ ~ ~~ a~ o aci 07 -_ ~~ LO ~ p N ~ V~ ~, ~~ O C O +. d C U U O O L E .~ "- N O 7 E O~~ O O C ~ O O C > U N E: p~ Q O ~ 'p ~ ~ ~ +_ Q ~ W ~ ~ ~ ~ U O~~ C O Q ~ C ~ +- C O C ~ >O,, ~ c~ O O C O L "" O C C E C a E: O ~~ ~ O- ~ O _O ~ ~ O ~ (~ C ~ O O U ~ ~ C ~ ~ N Q C~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O C U E _~ "O N N O ~ ~ ~ U U ~ ' ~ N -p ~ O O 7 L ~ ._.. ~ ~ - N B C OC ` ~ ~-O j C~ 0 C ~ C p ~ E ~ R C N ~ p~ L C ~" N O N ' c~ ~ to ~ ~ ~ O ~ i C O O L p ~ O y ~ ~ C ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 7 ~ O m ~ ~ O > ~ .~ ~ ~ O ~ ~ ~ C C ~ ~ ~ ~ p a C~ j O L -O • W O O i U (~ C ~ L p ~ U Q. ~ ~ rn - E: ~ c~ ~ p '~ O O C N C O ~ ~ cUC C c~ O '- C U X y ~~ N O ~ ~ O ~ to ~ -O O c C O p »= ~~ y 'a ~ 7 p .«- ~ L O ~ O L L _o ~ U _ ~ C cts f~ •--~ C~ lq ~ O ~ O C O ~ U U .C O C to 0 0~ U C ~ ~ ~ c0 ~ (~ 'O O ~ O C ~ ~ C O O p '- . C- p U O (n ~ ~ ~ (~ >' ~ .O O ~ E W ~ O ~ N -D Q O ~ ciS ~ ~ C ~ O_ c ~ ~ U to O ~ ~ ~ ~ U ~ U U ~ O (~ rn U O O i ~ L = ~ O ~ "' ` - p - to E: ~ ~ O ~ c~ L U ~ ~ C Cl~ O' C a ~ U C N~ 7 -p 3 L >+ W U N c~ ~ L ~ ~ C A L y ~ _ N C C RS ~ ~ ~ ~ -p U T cCf ~ ~ T ~ CO C~ ~ C~ C ~ Q ~ > ~ to U ~ O ~ ~ O ~ (~ ~ O) C L L ~ Q"C.. O_ O -O ~ ~ O ~ Q ~ O U ~ C U ~ ~ to "O ~ > %. (SS N N D U CO Q • O . C, D, E,F,G 374 • • • . . v v ~ ~ v N N N N N ' a a a a U Q ~ ~ Q Q . o 0 0 0 - o 3 3 ~ 3 3 a~ a~ m a~ m ai a>i ai ai ai ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ U U U U - U m m m m m . . U m m m U - ~' z ° °~ ~ Q c a~ ~ C °-= c~ ~~ ~ ~ °' o ~ a C~ ~ y U U ~~~~~' o w o ~ a~i~~ m~ a~i °C) m ~~~C3 ~ o o ° ~~ O O .~ +- O i ~ C cn p ~ 0 ~ p ~ U ~, ~ RS m ~ ~ L U C[S U p Cn ~ d7 ~ ~ in O > -p ~ ~ ~ O O _ Q .~- ~ O U C to ~ O ~ Q . C~ ~ ~ s ~ LLJ w O ~ C d.C>~~L >O.- a0 Q~ O O"O C ~ C C ~ ~ ~, L.J _OQ Z O Cn ...Z .«- C~O C (~ ~ U ~ U ~ ~Q~ ~ ~ > C ~ Q~~ Q Q -C U N ~ (d ~ p ~ ~ ~ C ~ ~ Q - ? ~ ~ (3 (~ d. " Q C r "~- C ~ ~ ~ J ~ N ~. ~ ? C a ~ ~ J O ~ O ~ ~ ~ c0 a a ~ = O ~ O O O i ~ ~ ~ O O ~ o ~ 0 0 7 O O N~~~ C ..O O Q~ C O~ p "" E: N ~ N~ in O>~~ p L J O` O ~ ~ ~ O ~ X c~ ~ ~ C N E co ~ C U ~ O ~U7 pin ~_ O C C ~ ~ p L O c~ ~ 'a ~ 7 (n d L 0 "J C ~ _ p +- N Q ~ p~ U C~ ~ .C _O L cn -n cL~ rn i ~ p Q p ~ C ~ O X O ~ > ~ c0 c~ O ZS ~ Z O r-• i N `- ~ N O > ~ ~ N p ~ c[S ~ ~ i ~ N ~ O p j Q ~ ~ O ~ ~, C ~ ~ ~ C ~ ~ > m O N O ~, ~ ~ N ~ ~ ~ O O X ~ > C U B ~ C to cti 'D " -O >' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ C in ~ ~ "-' U ' ~ O ~ > C ~ p E= 0 ~ ~ O ~ ~ C O ~ ' i~~ L E: ~ N C Q Ci3 U~ ""' O O_ y " O O O U U ~ O "O C C p . U p ., C O U~ *-' C ~ p C O~ C.~ O Q j L1J ~ N O ~ O C~ ~ in ~ p Vj ~ (~ C Q ~ ~ ccf ~ ~ N ~ O ~ - OU C (~j p -C Q" ~ ~ ~ N p p C~ _~ w C U N z U O ~• O ~ O ~ ~ ~ N ~ c~ O ~ O ~ to "" CO O ~ ~ O C ~ N ~ J .~ >~ ~ _~ E O 11 ~ p N O ~ ~ p ~ .~ ` =~ p O E "O ~ Q1 ~ d p O L ~ ~~~~ C~ U a1 U ~ 0.7 ~O ~ i ~ O ~? ~ i ~ ~ ~ rn O -O u~ N ~ "O ~ U S N p N r , N C C to U C ~ O ff?- ~> C o ~ ~ O Q._C U C y~ C C ° U~ mU .N z C p Uom ~~~ a~ J ° °'~ mL E °? ~ o [ 0 ~ 3~~ E ~ c a 3~ o~ O r C, D, E,F,G 375 . . v ~ ~ v N N N N d' ~ Q U U U U Q Q Q ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ _ °- _ °- _ °- _ _~ 0 0 0 O O O O U U U O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ U U U U C~ C~ C~ O O O O O O 0 0 O O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ D U D U U • m m m m U U U . . m m m m m m U N = to ~ cn C 'o - = C~ ~ cn .c •- ~ ~ ~ C a> c~ L j, a~ c N >, " >, " d' N >• N ~ a> L O L Y ~ O~ N > "_ > O l~ >, L O O O _ O O ~ O c~ ` C E O -O U~ C~ ~~ 7~ E~ O C LL. ~ O ~ i- Ll . ~ O x "~" N 1 >, N ~ ~ O ?~ Q N ~ ~ c~ ~ c0 -6 ~ to O ~ Ln . ci3 ~ _O (0 ~ -p p _>i N 'p X C E N ~ O 3 L ~ ~ O O -O U C C ~ _O C O- O C ... N ~ C O O - i > ~ U C~ .-. C~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ cn ° ~ °.a "'- ro ° c cU n ac ocAO ~ E c°i~~ orn o~ °~ w c °' ~co c pN > ~'a °o ° o °~ a o E . o~. O - ~° ~ x ° ~ c ~ i~ ~ m a° y m m in 0 ~-o 0 o ~ c oQ o ~ c o.= o o ~ ~ E ~ °,~-~ o - ~ ~ o ~ ~ - ~ ..+ U U . U O O ct3 ~ ~ OL C ~ ~ -p C O ~ N ~ ~ ~ Q ~O O ~ O ~ O ~ E ~ ~ .~ cd U ~ ~ ~ ~ .~ -p ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ ~ O ~ U O ~ O O O ~ c0 ~ ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ m ~ O U _ ~ '~- O p ~ ~ N ~ ~ ~ a c ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ct3 ~ _ r m U "~ N - ~ ~ v U ~ ~ C -O O ~ O - O N O.. ~_ ~ - ~ E cd O N -~ ,~ _ ~ 6 N "D R3 N ~ L ~ O ~ c ~ O ~ ~ O "- O .~ ~ ~ O O ~ ~ N in ~. O N O -6 ~ . _ m 'p ~ ~ ~ ~= C U U ~ O J RS c~ ~ ~ C O O L .. ~Qy N 00 ~~ ~ ~ L E CAL ~~0~ O~ O fl- ~~ ~ O O - ~-' "~ ~ C_ O ~ ~ ~ ~ O to ~ -p -~ C C~ U in ~ 00 O L p ,~ ~ ~ H ~ O to O > U ~ p O cn c <n cn " ~ O N ~ ~ ~ c6 i > N~ ~ U O CC C (~ ~ C (~ > ~ ~- O~ C_ U O C ~ O O_ ~- ~ j ~ a~ C~ ~ T d O N O Q '- CSf O ~ 6 ~ CtS 7 CO (~ L U U N C ~ O O ~ O ~ ~ O ~ C Ctl \ ~ C ~ ~ O C ~ O > ~ _O ~ (LS 7 ~ m ~ ~ ~ O Q U ~ CD ~ O ~ ~ 7 m ~- ~ ~ ~ O U L C C U (n r ~ ~ U ~ N L fn ~ ~ ~ N ~--' C~ O • C, D, E,F,G 376 • • • ~ • V • Q C 0 ~~ C y ~ C ~ O U • O O ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ c0 C ~ vUi C ~ O -pL~. ~ CO .D d 3~~nc-off ~ ~~ m ~ o ~~ ~cc~~~aim ~ U p C .`~ O "p ~~~ m c0 O >+~O OL= Q. ~ N ~ UL. ~~„ 'J O Y N ~ ~ ~ ~ n- O _O ~ L L ~ O 'C f 7 O (O C >+ ~ ~ ~ ~ ` C c ~ ~ cC o ~ ~ > > .D C~ C ~ p O C .,.r ~ .C ~ ~ ~ "~ T O ~ ~ N ~ E°~~ ~ t o o ~ >: Q O O ~ cn ~ O ~ ~+ ~ ~ z ~ _ ~ 00 ~~a U +.• c~a ~ ~ (~ p p L c~ p ~n c~ ~~ O C c0 CA p ~ i ~ > ~ Q 0 0- ~ "6 O C O C _ ~ ~ c .~ ~ n ~ ~ ~ C ~ - ~ > U , ~l ~ ~ d cco m a > V- '~ U r ~ = O y l C O m ~ ~ 0 n~, ~` (4 O ~ ~ U m "D ~ O ,~~rr a. { Q y N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ p r ~' ~~ ~ -o C7 -o U -o i o Q m ~ U , '~~"~ 'rO' o ~ L 0 L 0 L ~ U C_ 0 ~C 0 arty' L L_ L d (0 ~ N O ~. :..~ g t N M ~ ~ (O 1~ n f N ~ ro a ~ a~ ab; ~ -° 4+' > ~ } s3.`P ~.. r ~ 'C ~ a * Q. a Q ~ m : p ++ ~_ Q ~„ 'v» E "1~~R o - U ~ a _ E ='~~ ~ d T C Y .O ~ fr C ~ Q ~ ~ N r Z~ ~ U ,`~C'i. ~ `~ c °~ L c ~ a ~^$ O O ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~g Q m U O ;~ ~ ' 3bd& c ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 0 ~~. Q1,+~ N ~ C o U ~ d v G )'° 3 ~ o c ~~a~.~ ~~- ~. o Z c U p , "t71 "~` -c m U o r n o~ ~i W o f- ~ E o ~ ~p O ~_ o o U ~ k ~ n. F- O O ` G, ~_~, Q m cv o w o a~ c a~ o `^ O O D C ~ ~ ~ E ai c O7 m a o c m m ~ ~ m m L ~ D ~ o Rs ° ai Q. .~` C N U (d ~ d ~ C C O ~ ~ N E ~ w ~ ~ U p U y Y ~ o ~ Q. ~ U U m a ~ d o d w 0 0 0 ~ U U U m a W N C O d .Q Q _N Y V d S U O A d Y C, D, E,F,G 377 O • RESOLUTION NO 07-38 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18179, A SUBDIVISION OF 10.1 ACRES OF LAND INTO TWO LOTS FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES IN THE MIXED USE DISTRICT, LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND GROVE AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN 0207-011-35, 36, 41, 43, 44 AND 45. A. Recitals. 1. Arbors at Route 66, LLC filed an application for the approval of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18179, as described in the title of this Resolution Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Tentative Tract Map request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 27th day of June 2007, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B Resolution. • NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on June 27, 2007, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows a. The application applies to approximately 10.1 acres of land, basically an irregular quadrangle configuration, located at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Grove Avenue and is presently agriculturally and residentially developed, and b. The property to the north of the subject site is a golf course, the property to the south consists of commercial shops, the property to the east is single-family residences, and the property to the west is commercial uses with the City of Upland; and c. The application provides more parking than required; and d The applicant has provided substantial technical evidence to support these conclusions 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows. C, D,E,F,G 381 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 07-38 SUBTT18179 -ARBORS AT ROUTE 66, LLC June 27, 2007 Page 2 a. That the Tentative Tract Map is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable specific plans; and b. The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed; and c. The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat, and d. The Tentative Tract Map is not likely to cause serious public health problems; and e. The design of the Tentative Tract Map will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included forthe environmental assessmentfor the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: • a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. b. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it, finds: (i) that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; and (ii) that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment The Planning Commission further finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission. Based on these findings, the Planning Commission hereby adopts the Mitigated Negative Declaration. c The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081 6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation. The Planning Commission therefore adopts the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project d. The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring Program and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the Planning Commission's decision is based is the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 477-2750. C, D, E,F,G 382 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 07-38 SUBTT18179 -ARBORS AT ROUTE 66, LLC June 27, 2007 Page 3 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Planning Department 1) This application is subject to the approval of General Plan Amendment DRC2006-00223, Development District Amendment DRC2006-00350, and Development Code Amendment DRC2007-00029 by the City Council and approval of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18179 by the Planning Commission. 2) All conditions imposed on General Plan Amendment DRC2006-00223, Development District Amendment DRC2006-00350, Development Code Amendment DRC2007-00029, and Development Review DRC2006-00341 by the City Council and Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18179 by the Planning Commission shall be a condition of approval for this resolution. 3) The applicant shall execute a covenant on the land in a form substantially similar to the Parking Declaration attached to the • accompanying Staff Report in order to make the parking area of the office building available to the residents during off hours. 4) The applicant shall execute a covenant on the land in a form substantially similar to the Use Restrictions attached to the accompanying Staff Report in order to only allow uses in the live/work units that are compatible with the Master Plan. 5) The signage for the office building shall incorporate a restrained use of off-lighting orhalo-lighting with minimal identification within the confines of the Foothill Boulevard Route 66 Visual Improvement Plan. Sign review is a separate review process. 6) The lobby entry door and surrounding areas shall incorporate decorative security measures to be reviewed by the Planning Director for compatibility with the architectural design of the office building 7) The applicant shall provide studies necessary to determine if a protected left-turn signal for southbound Grove Avenue onto Foothill Boulevard is warranted and shall install it subJect to CalTrans approval, if necessary. Engineering Department 1) Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surface drainage entering the property from adjacent areas Consider the O,oo runoff flow of 27 8 cfs entering the project site from the north indicated in the January 2006 Parsons-Brinkerhoff Drainage Study prepared for the City. C, D, E,F,G 383 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 07-38 SUBTT18179 -ARBORS AT ROUTE 66, LLC June 27, 2007 Page 4 2) The easement on the property, rn Rancho Cucamonga to the City of Upland, is to be quitclaimed by the developer. 3) Final Map shall show corner property line cutoff per City Standard Drawing No 102, show point access easements for Lots 1 and 2, and wall-only easement for entry monument 4) Once Red Hill Country Club Drive is realigned the City will pursue the vacation of the existing Red Hill Country Club Drive along this development's frontage. This development shall install temporary frontage improvements along Red Hill Country Club Drive subject to City Engineer and Crty Planner approval. Prior to recordation of the final map this development shall substantiate to the City Engineer's satisfaction that upon future vacation of Red Hill Country Club Drive this development will provide for removals and establishment of the new facilities along Red Hill Country Club Drive subject to Crty Engineer and Planning Director approval 5) Provide a study necessary to determine if protected left-turn signals for north and southbound Grove Avenue onto Foothill Boulevard are warranted and install them subject to Caltrans approval, if necessary. 6) Foothrll Boulevard improvements, including City entry monument and entry gateway at the Grove Avenue\Foothrll Boulevard intersection, streetlights, patterned sidewalk with tree wells, etc shall conform to the Visual Improvement Program for Foothill Boulevard and the Foothill Boulevard Districts guidelines outlined in the Development Code 7) Foothill Boulevard frontage improvements are to be in accordance with City "Mayor Divided Arterial Streets" standards. Install curb and gutter, asphalt pavement, sidewalk, streetlights, ADA access ramps, and street trees per City standards, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer a) Provide 27,000 and 16,000 lumen HPSV streetlights, in accordance with the Foothill Visual Improvement Plan b) Provide dual ADA access ramps at the Grove Avenue\Foothrll Boulevard intersection per City Standard Drawing No 102 c) Protect existing street improvements. d) Provide or protect R26(s) "No Stopping" signs along the frontage e) Protect or replace traffic signal equipment. 8) Grove Avenue frontage improvements are to be in accordance with City "Secondary Arterial Streets" standards. Install sidewalk, drive approach, streetlights, and street trees per City standards, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. C,D,E,F,G 384 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 07-38 SUBTT18179 -ARBORS AT ROUTE 66, LLC June 27, 2007 Page 5 a) An exception to the 50-foot maximum drive approach width (60 feet is being allowed for this project) is permitted although the drive approach shall comply with City Standard Drawing No. 101 in all other respects. b) Sidewalk shall be property-line-adfacent and shall comply with City Standard Drawing No. 103, "With Non-Contiguous Sidewalk" example. For the drive approach on Grove Avenue, its intersection with the sidewalk shall comply with City Standard Drawing No. 101, "Non-Contiguous Sidewalk" example. c) Referring to the drive approach, City Standard Drawing No. 101 shows a "non-contiguous" (property-line-adjacent) sidewalk crossing the driveway outside of the 90-degree curb return arc. Provide a sidewalk easement necessary for this on the final map. d) The gated driveway is to be in accordance with the City "Gated Entrance Design Guide", except that a 60-foot maximum drive approach width is permitted. e) Provide 9500 lumen HPSV streetlights. f) Protect existing street improvements. g) Provide or protect R26(s) "No Stopping" signs. 9) Red Hill Country Club Drive frontage improvements are to be in accordance with City "Local Streets" standards. Install curb and gutter, A.C. pavement, sidewalk, ADA access ramp at Foothill Boulevard, limited access curb at emergency driveway, streetlights, and street trees per City standards, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. a) Gated driveway shall be "Emergency Access Only". b) No "turf block" is allowed in the public right-of-way. c) Provide 5800 lumen HPSV streetlights. d) Protect existing street improvements. e) Provide or protect R26(s) "No Stopping" signs. 10) Coordinate the installation of Foothill Boulevard frontage improvements with the City project. 11) A contribution in-lieu of construction for the future median island in • Foothill Boulevard shall be paid to the City prior to the issuance of building permits or final map approval, whichever occurs first The amount of the contribution shall be one-half the cost of the median times the length of the project frontage C, D, E,F,G 385 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 07-38 SUBTT18179 -ARBORS AT ROUTE 66, LLC June 27, 2007 Page 6 12) An in-lieu fee for one-half the cost of constructing special pavers within the Foothill Boulevard\G rove Avenue intersection shall be paid to the City prior to the issuance of building permits The fee amount shall be based on the square footage of the intersection. 13) The existing overhead utilities (telecommunications and electrical, except for the 66 kV electrical) on the project side of Grove Avenue shall be undergrounded from the first pole on the south side of Foothill Boulevard to the first pole off site north of the north project boundary, prior to public improvement acceptance or occupancy, whichever occurs first. All services crossing Grove Avenue shall be undergrounded at the same time Since the west side of Grove Avenue is in the City of Upland, reimbursement is not an option. 14) The existing overhead utilities (telecommunications and electrical, except for the 66 kV electrical) on the project side of Red Hill Country Club Drive shall be undergrounded, prior to public improvement acceptance or occupancy, whichever occurs first. All services crossing Red Hill Country Club Drive shall be undergrounded at the same time. The developer may request a reimbursement agreement to recover one-half the City adopted cost for undergrounding from future development (redevelopment) as it occurs on the opposite side of the street. If the developer fails to submit for said reimbursement agreement within 6 months of the public improvements being accepted by the City, all rights of the developer to reimbursement shall terminate. 15) Manholes shall be provided wherever public storm drain systems end and private systems begin Provide appropriate easements wherever public storm drains cross private property and obtain an encroachment agreement to place private facilities within public rights-of-way. 16) Parkways shall slope at 2 percent from the top of the curb to one foot behind the sidewalk along all street frontages 17) Driveway accent paving shall be located outside the public right of way 18) Public improvement plans shall be 90 percent complete prior to the issuance of grading permits Public improvement plans shall be 100 percent complete, signed by the City Engineer, and an improvement agreement and bonds executed by the developer, prior to building permit issuance 19) Complete the submitted Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) per the requirements of the City Engineer including, but not limited to, showing the Best Management Practices (BMPs) on grading plans, and signing and recording the Memorandum of Agreement • C, D, E,F,G 386 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 07-38 SUBTT18179 -ARBORS AT ROUTE 66, LLC June 27, 2007 Page 7 Environmental Mitigation Air Quality 1) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification. 2) Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, the developer shall submit construction plans to City denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low-emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the project. Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning staff 3) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113 Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high volume, low-pressure spray. • 4) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108. 5) All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 401, 402 and 403. Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions: • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads. • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time. • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods • Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices • Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. C,D,E,F,G 387 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 07-38 SUBTT18179 -ARBORS AT ROUTE 66, LLC June 27, 2007 Page 8 Suspend grading operations during high winds (i e., wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with Rule 403 requirements. Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means. 6) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWQCB]) dailyto reduce Fine Particulate Matter (PM,o) emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. 7) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions 8) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel-powered equipment where feasible 9) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. • 10) All industrial and commercial faalities shall post signs requiring that trucks shall not be left idling for prolonged periods (i e , in excess of 10 minutes). 11) All industrial and commercial facilities shall designate preferential parking for vanpools 12) All industrial and commercial site tenants with 50 or more employees shall be required to post both bus and Metrolink schedules in conspicuous areas 13) All industrial and commeraal site tenants with 50 or more employees shall be required to configure their operating schedules around the Metrolink schedule to the extent reasonably feasible 14) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate high-effiaency/low-polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters. 15) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping. 16) Use of Zero-VOC paints (assumes no more than 100 grams/liter of VOC) such as those listed by the SCAQMD of Super-Compliant Architectural Coating Manufacturers. C,D,E,F,G 388 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 07-38 SUBTT18179 -ARBORS AT ROUTE 66, LLC June 27, 2007 Page 9 B~o/og~cal Resources 1) A Tree Removal Permit must be approved that provides for the replacement of the 12 on a 1'1 ratio basis with no fewer than two California Sycamores (Platanus Racemosa) placed in a prominent location in the protect Cultural Resources 1) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will. • Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value • Consider establishing provisions to require incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point • Pursue educating the public about the area's archaeological heritage. • Propose mitigation measures and recommend conditions of approval to eliminate adverse protect effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, following appropriate CEQA guidelines. • Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the protect area. Submit one copy of the completed report with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. 2) If any paleontological resource (i e, plant or animal fossils) are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified paleontologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide speafic recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i e , paleontological monitoring) that maybe appropriate. Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures • Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing activities C, D, E,F,G 389 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 07-38 SUBTT18179 -ARBORS AT ROUTE 66, LLC June 27, 2007 Page 10 Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage. If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find. Prepare, identify, and curate all recovered fossils for documentation in the summary report and transfer to an appropriate depository (i a ,San Bernardino County Museum). Submit a summary report to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to San Bernardino County Museum Geology and Sods 1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PM,o emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 or re-planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible. 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM,o emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. 3) Grading operations shall be 25 mph to minimize PM,o episodes. suspended when wind speeds exceed emissions from the site during such 4) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM10 emissions. Hydrology and Water Quality Construction Activities 1) Prior to issuance of grading permits, the permit applicant shall submit to Building Official for approval, Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) speafically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical 2) An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included in the Grading Plan, and implemented for the proposed project that identifies specific measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading This Erosion Control Plan shall include the following measures at a • • C,D,E,F,G 390 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 07-38 SUBTT18179 -ARBORS AT ROUTE 66, LLC June 27, 2007 Page 11 minimum a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-site as a result of this project will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame 3) During construction, temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff 4) During construction, to remove pollutants, street cleaning will be performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site. Post- Construction Operational: 5) The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in the Water Quality Management Plan (WOMP) prepared by Fuscoe Engineering on July 3, 2006, to reduce pollutants after construction entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. • 6) Landscaping plans shall include provisions for controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth. Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permits. 7) Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Engineer for approval of a W OMP, including a project description and identifying BMPs that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable The WQMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004. 8) Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board Evidence that this has been obtained (i e., a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Building Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit. C, D, E,F,G 391 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 07-38 SUBTT18179 -ARBORS AT ROUTE 66, LLC June 27, 2007 Page 12 Norse Exterior 1) Construct a 5-foot high barrier for Lots (Units) 7 through 10 and Lots (Units) 72 through 92 facing Foothill Boulevard and Grove Avenue 2) Construct a 5-foot high second floor balcony noise barrier for Lots (Units) 88 and 89 facing Foothill Boulevard. Intenor• 3) Provide a "windows closed" condition requiring a means of mechanical ventilation for all homes 4) Provide standard dual-glazed windows with a Sound Transmission Class (STC) rating of 26 or higher for all units and homes facing Grove Avenue and Foothill Boulevard 5) To minimize the potential interior noise impacts, lots (units) facing Foothill Boulevard should be provided with weather-stripped solid core exterior doors, and exterior wall/roof assemblies should be free of cut outs and openings • 6) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8.00 p.m. and 6 30 a m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. 7) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified m Development Code Section 17.02 120-D, as measured at the property line. The developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17 02 120 Monitoring at other times may be required by the Building Official Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building Official within 24 hours, however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building Official If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted 8) The perimeter block wall shall be constructed as early as possible in first phase 9) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 8 00 p m. and 6.30 a m on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. Additionally, if heavytrucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a Noise Mitigation Plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes. To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. C, D, E,F,G 392 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 07-38 SUBTT18179 -ARBORS AT ROUTE 66, LLC June 27, 2007 Page 13 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 27TH DAY OF JUNE 2007 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Pam Stewart, Chairman ATTEST: James R. Troyer, AICP, Secretary I, James R. Troyer, AICP, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 27th day of June 2007, by the following vote-to-wit: • AYES COMMISSIONERS. NOES: COMMISSIONERS. ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: C, D, E,F,G 393 r~ Project File No. SUBTT18179 PROGRAM City of Rancho Cucamonga MITIGATION MONITORING DRC2006-00223, DRC2006-00341, DRC2006-00350, DRC2007-00029, This Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP) has been prepared for use in implementing the mitigation measures identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration fortheabnve-listed project. This program has been prepared in compliance with State law to ensure that adopted mitigation measures are implemented (Section 21081.6 of the Public Resources Code) Program Components -This MMP contains the following elements• Conditions of approval that act as impact mitigation measures are recorded with the action and the procedure necessary to ensure compliance. The mitigation measure conditions of approval are contained in the adopted Resolution of Approval for the project. 2 A procedure of compliance and verification has been outlined for each action necessary. This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported 3. The MMP has been designed to provide focused, yet flexible guidelines. As monitoring progresses, changes to compliance procedures may be necessary based upon recommendations by those responsible for the program. Program Management -The MMP will be in place through all phases of the project. The project planner, assigned by the Planning Director, shall coordinate enforcement of the MMP. The project planner oversees the MMP and reviews the Reporting Forms to ensure they are filled out correctly and proper action is taken on each mitigation. Each City department shall ensure compliance of the conditions (mitigation) that relate to that department. Procedures -The following steps will be followed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. A fee covering all costs and expenses, including any consultants' fees, incurred by the City in performing monitoring or reporting programs shall be charged to the applicant 2. A MMP Reporting Form will be prepared for each potentially significant impact and its corresponding mitigation measure identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Checklist, attached hereto This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported All monitoring and reporting documentation will be kept in the project file with the department having the original authority for processing the project. Reports will be available from the City upon request at the following address• City of Rancho Cucamonga -Lead Agency Planning Department 10500 Civic Center Dnve Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 C,D,E,F,G 394 MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM DRC2006-00223, DRC2006-00341, DRC2006-00350, DRC2007-00029, SUBTT18179 Page 2 3. Appropriate specialists will be retained if technical expertise beyond the City staff's is needed, as determined by the project planner or responsible City department, to monitor specific mitigation activities and provide appropriate written approvals to the project planner. 4. The project planner or responsible City department will approve, by signature and date, the completion of each action item that was identified on the MMP Reporting Form After each measure is verified for compliance, no further action is required for the specific phase of development. 5 All MMP Reporting Forms for an impact issue requiring no further monitoring will be signed off as completed by the project planner or responsible City department at the bottom of the MMP Reporting Form 6. Unanticipated circumstances may arise requiring the refinement or addition of mitigation measures The project planner is responsible for approving any such refinements or additions An MMP Reporting Form will be completed by the project planner or responsible City department and a copy provided to the appropriate design, construction, or operational personnel 7. The project planner or responsible City department has the authority to stop the work of construction contractors if compliance with any aspects of the MMP is not occurring after written notification has been issued. The project planner or responsible City department also has the authority to hold certificates of occupancies if compliance with a mitigation measure • attached hereto is not occurring The project planner or responsible City department has the authority to hold issuance of a business license until all mitigation measures are implemented. 8. Any conditions (mitigation) that require monitoring after project completion shall be the responsibility of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department. The Department shall require the applicant to post any necessary funds (or other forms of guarantee) with the City These funds shall be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measure for the required period of time 9 In those instances requiring long-term project monitoring, the applicant shall provide the City with a plan for monitoring the mitigation activities at the project site and reporting the monitoring results to the City. Said plan shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented. The monitoring/reporting plan shall conform to the City's MMP and shall be approved by the Community Development Director or Planning Director prior to the issuance of building permits • C, D,E,F,G 395 • • a J _Q F- Z G F- J Y W U Z_ O Z Q ~_ '"' J U J J ~D d O ~ O i O O N .C L r Q N C ~ ~ ~ U .Q ~ Q. ~C Q ^ V /I O O ~ N ~ d (6 ~. z° a a~ ~ _ ~ ~ +~+ U N ~ lC a ~~'' ~~ ~,~ ; . ~, ~_~ _-~, ~~~ . • Vii?' ~;'' N N N N N N Ji ~;':'," ~~, ~` • • a a. a ~ Q ~ ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 '~ ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ', a i i a a i i a i a a i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ U U U m U U • o m ` ~ ° ° ° • ` ~ ~ m m m C O~ C L 0 O "6_ O~~~ Q O T ` ~ ~ ~ 0 O ref O ~ ~ ~-~ ciS "O +- U ~_ U U > ~ p O U O U O U r i _O L Q~ cn C •-. "p O -.~ ~ ~ ~ Uo ~m 'F ,~ o O ~ O u, ocn~_ ~ a 0 ~ ~ ~ s p~~ _ O (~ Q. '~ ~ ~ ~~ O Q p- to -d In U ~ U O ~ ~~~ ~ ~ O U L~ to _ `~'° , O C U C >' O ~ ~ O f~ ~ O ~ ~ C C~ QJ ~ L ' t~ ~ O ' O ~, C0 0 0 0 > ~ O _ C Q O- O H O cn O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N ( ~ U E ~ ~ , U ~ ~ U O O ~ ~ C L Q p O O O L - ~ O 7 ~ O7 .~. "O C ~ ~ ~ ~ - Cn = O O ~ ' O Q l 7 O C " U 0 C 07 O C rv} i s C~ i~ c~ U L (/~ O N j= '- ~ C O C O~ Q C~ U CLS to In C O O Q " ~~ O C O Q O ~ 07 0 ~ L~ ~ n ~ ~~ `, "~ ~ _ (~ (~ L C L C ~ !n ~ cn j C O (n O L C O p ~ - U ~ N ~L L N ~ ~ U _~ x I C ¢ j > CO ~ ~ • i ~,, O T C E ~ .. (n p O N E E= -_ C ~ 7 r ~ N O M ~ ~ a ~ O ~ U A U~ O cn N O~ y L U ~n CSS "~ y~ O p ~ ~ Q ~ C~ • i C O ~ ~o o QQO o C ,.p p- C ~ 7 (~ C ~ ~ 0 0 0~ o- ~ ~ U ~' O ~ In ~ p-a ~a ~ ~ o0 ~ CA ~~ c O p) ° c °' o-aL ~ °' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ °' a ~ o~ ~ ~ ~ ~ -a ~.~c- 3 ~ ~' o-° ~~ ~C~ o c~ ~ oo- ° -o ~ oo °~~~; o ~' ~ U c ~ c ~ °~ ~~ ~ ~ .- o cn ~ -6 ~~ c~ ~ ~ o cLn U -o ~~ "- ` -~ c n -Q • "= ~ ~ O O c~ O ` _ _ .~ C N O ~ ~ U C .r ~ ~ C S ~ ` ~ L ~ ;. RJ + -. C O O C C~ U N O Q D_ ~ p U N~ U ~ N~ 1 p m - ~ ~ c C cLf - c0 ~ ~ ct L C Q - in ~ ~ ~ O cn N O N ~~ ~ ~ U ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ C C~ U C O ,,.,, ~ ~ fl- N Q to cn c0 C ~ ~ C (SS C C ~ Q. O , C L y "a f~ O O N ~ U~~ ~ ,, ..: ~ - a ~ O O ~ O ~~ A N O O O a' > a' > O O c~ a3 J - N ~ m - p - ~ U -d Q o o U E~ U ~~~ o o m SU E~~ Q Qd..c Q c Q~ ~ C, D, E,F,G 396 rn 0 . . N N N d' rh d' ~' ~ ~ ~t N ' a a a Q Q Q Q Q ~ a s c c c C c c a Q a o o ~ o o • O O O O CJ U _ U ~ U U O O y ~ ~ ~ ~ C ~ C y C N C ~ C ~ ~ ~ > O > O > N > N i ~ C O C O O L C 0 0 ~ 7° i ~ 7 0 > N > N ~ ~ ~ ~ D v D U D U D v D v ~ ~ U U U U U U U U U U U . • . . m m m m m m m m m m m ~ a> c -o ~ v - t cn ~ -° >> c ~ C O c ~ ~° -a ~ ~ ° ~ _ ~'a°~ v ~ ~o c~ o ~°~ ca ..~ o m va> ~ ~ ca i iau i N° O ° ~ ~U ~ ~O ~ ~ .Q~ ~~ E~ ~co ~ ~o m U c~ -a .~. i a~ a U~ U i ~ a> m ~°'~ ~ O U~ ~ O ~ N C O cn O 0 0~~ .C C °~ C C In O C ~ ~ 'O >+ i ~ ~ Q U O f0 L N~ N ~ ~ O ~ In C fn _ ~ ~ N (~ ~ U U ~ t~ O ~ ~ C ~ O -C ~ ~ ~ O ~ C ~ - C to CO C O N O E: ~ U ctf ~ > U Q ~ Q N A ~`-. ~ ~ ~ m ~ ~ ~ > - ~ O _~ O O N >+ ~~ C j O "D ~ -O ~~ N C U O O ~ j O ~ ctf c~ O Q cts E_ ~ fl- ~~ (6 ~ X E_ ~ ` ° m ~ i -~ ~ N 7 C T ~ ~ C ~ ~ Q O ~ _ ~ ~ U C C ~ > O O O O ~ - O V C ctS U C ~ Q ~ ~ ~ O~~ ~ Q N ~ Q O O p U ~ ~ C ~ "O j ~ "'' `O ~ U O ~ O C E j N~ > D U "O N Q- O U U U O O N Q~ C~ L E N ~ 9 ~~~ fn ~ Q~ O C~ ~ C O (~ O.. O ~ _ O O C O N "" c~ O ~ ~ U y U i-O ~-' O T O 00 ~ U d' >> ~ O U _UQ N c c~ ~ U N O_C C - cB O c 0 QO 0 6 ~ U1 >' ~ > > _ f~ ~' Q i C X ~ C y C ~ ~ 7 ~ ~ ~ U ~ ~ O ~ ~ ~ O ~n U ~ cn O O ~ ~ "= N > ~ ~ ~ c~ u> ~~ O ~ Y ~ L_ - ~ _ O N 0 C o_ O p - ~ c~ Q~ Ln O O O ~ ~° ~ U O _ _ ~ cLS ~ U~ E U ~ 'O N ctl ~ C U L m~ C~ O C O 0 O L ~- _o O U 7 `~ 7 ~ O N -O ~ ~ CO O ~ ~ O D_ N ~ ~ ~ ~ a. ~ c~ .«O'-. ~ N > ~ U ~ O ~ ~ ~ N ~ O to O ~ U~ ~ O O L U Q O M ~ _ O~ ~ C cn O ~ Q- -O ~ ~ C C c0 c0 ~~ cV U O ~ ~ C O - U m~~ U '~ O ~> p c~ O U 7 ~ ~ ~ ~ RS ~ O (n N ~ ~ U ~ (0 O ~ >, p Cn ~ ~ I- U (~ (n ~ (n N 7 ~ L O O ~ ~ ~ O ~ d ~ 7 O U C ` ~ C N- ~` U ~ ~ ° ~ N "O U ~ O O _~ O N O ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ (~ n i- c c~ F- c~ I- U U • O • N • C, D,E,F,G 397 • • c\ M M ~ ~ d~ V f ~t N N N N N N _ ~-~_ ` ' '- ~ CV ~,"-~F 'v4r t 4 1tr • ~ i Ness Q a o o U U U a -- ~ ~ ~ ~ a Q ~ ~. ~ _ _ O _ O _ O _ O _ O _ O _ O n F_ s _ O ~ ~ ~ ~ 3 3 ~ ~ a~ a~ a~ a~ o m a~ ~ a~ ai a>i m m >m m ai a>> ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . r Q U U U U U U U ~ m ~ ~ . u~ ~q P _ ~~ zl O //~~ LJ.. //~~ L.L //~~ LL O O O /^~ LL i r~ ; niA_' ' [~ U U U r~ 00 0o U ,"~ ~n-a C N m ~~ O C ~~o O O '"' m~ ~ C~ m-o ~ C oa~~ O L C ~" ~ncncn... O y C U " " a~=c m ~ O O L m~ ~ C ~ p) O cS3 L1') U1 OL.. O Ln 7 - N - p (i3 ct3 r "' ~ C > ~ O O C O ~ L ~ O . (~ L N O 7 ~ + ~ i O .r ~ 7 N O - ~ O O ~ an- ~ ~~ ~ °~~ !n ~ ~ U ~ ~ ~ ~ _ i~ ~ ~~ - ~ ~c ~ > > c - o _ ~ ~~° ~ ~ `~ ~°~ m e ~ m o w e _ ' ~~ a> c o o o o U o~ c m -c ~ c ~ Oin ~ ~ c ~ ~ c ~ ~~ c ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ c > ° ~ ° N o w y E ~'" ~ ~ ca ~_.-. °-a y N ~ c Q C o ro oo ~~- ~ a i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ° o c o ~ ° o c ~ ~ ~,o N `~ c .~.. m ~= m" ~ m m~ ~n„- ~ ~ a ~~¢ a~Cn o U c E c~~U ~ ~ "' O ~ m~ ~~ N O S - L 'J E C O~ in O ~ p 0 ~ O O_ cII 6. Q V c~ N 'D L O L Q O O cn - N O c O p~ ~ '-' ~ c0 • ~ ~~ m ~ ° ~ o °~ ° c ~ ~ ~ ~" ~, ~ E Er ~ ° ~ ~ o a~,~ ~~ ~ E i ~-° ~ ~- ~ ~ o c~ ~ o ~ ~ ~U ~-- o ~ c~~ ~ °~ ~ E~~ ~ ~ U E ~ ~ U L ~ ~?• U In N ~ o~ a ~- O O "O Q coU~ ~ p- cn U Eo c O C ~ 'p ~ . _ oLa" ~ i U ~ -O ~ ~ -O C Y .O ~ C ~ .O ~ 7 C ~ O .«~ _ ~ LO O O U ~ p ~ ~ ~ ~ N ~ N ~ U (p C _O O N O N N O +. C ~ C ~ c~ O ~ O O O U T L (CS ~~ CCS O c~ (~ Q p ~ ~ ,~ i O y ~ ~ c~ > O L j O N~ ~ L 'Q •~ •'+ ~ ~-' ~~ ~ Q nS - . L c~ O U ~ O U~ O C O O~ O O H O ~' y N 'O B O O to in ~ = in ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ °~ ~ ~ -o co ~ ~ ~ N ~ ~ v ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ vi N O ~ c cn ~ N ~ O ~ O ~ N of ~ O O ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ >, c c~ a~ ~ O -~~ - N - O N - O Q O - a' O - Q p U O U c~ O I- ~ ..-. O O N U c ~' n. Q Q ¢ E~ Q E o~ Q mL Q °' 3 ~ mcn~ m Q ° ~~ U i °~ ~ ac`a a rn 0 c~ C, D, E,F,G 398 ~ ~ v ~ ~ M C7 C'') C7 M ~ 'a a a s a a O a O ~ o a 0 a 0 Q 0 a ~ ~ ~ a~ ~ a~ • 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ m m a~ m a~ a~ ai a>i m ai a>i a>i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ U U U U U m • O O O O m m m m ~ ~ n_ n_ ~ a U U U U U U ~ m~~ °'~cn `~ ~n-~U °-oUE ~ `~~E~°a°'Eo° a`~ip~ ~~ ~ °v°i-°° ~O~m°~ o~°~ooE~Q~ ~ O O ~ ~ O .-. CSS E ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o O N L O (TS O O ~ > ~ : .C (A - ~ O) O) °~ ~ _ ° ~ ~ ~ _ _ O ~ ~ ~ ~ - a C~ ~ C Q ~ C N 2i Q ~ ~ a C ° ~ ~ j ~ C ~ i ~ ~ U O C U to N ~~ E N p m C .-. O N "O CO O~ ~ L ~ C ~ .r N p ~ ~ o ~"-' ~o ~ Q ~ ~ ~ o v ~ o~ ~ o ? ~~E E ~ ~ o~ ~ cn O~ ~ r N O - O p j~ O~ .~ N ~ ~ -p ~ U ~~ O ~- 7 C ~ ~ ~ .-• .,~.., ~ ~ (~ ~ In N ~ O Q ~ ~ _ ~ ~ (0 ~ O "= C O ~ ~ ~~ C O ~- 0 0 L i~ ~~ N C ~_ ~ ~ >~ O O O ~ O ~ O O U C~ ~ O p E O O ,~, _~ ~~~ O O C U E O > E p '- p E ~ O O d ~ O C O L co a~~ U~ i0 C O C C U N c~ ~~ ~~ O O N N C Cn C D_ S _ N C +~- co i~ - U~ ~ c~ cn ~ O ~ ~ O ~ - U p) ~ ~ U C +-, _ ~ ,-- O O p c0 > ~ p N ctf ~ ~n ~ O U ~ p~ O H O 'O ~ E° C` ~ C E E~ O) O~~ V O E O' >~ ~ C O O i (~ ~ ~. ~O O O ~ C O U O ~ o ~ C "O '~ ~~ O7 ~ ~C O N- ~~~ O O> N ~ -~ ~ ~~ ~° o~ ~ ~ o~ ~ p ~ ~~~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~~ oQ °--~~~ ~ ~~~ _ ~ N to L ~ ~ Q C O > ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ ~ ~ -O ° ~ O_ U Q C~ ~ L i ~ ~ ~~ ~ Q ~ Q U O -~ ~ ~ D1 ~ Q~ C ~ C W cn ~ c~ O U aJ U S "O '~ O a c~ ~ O ` 7 ~ U N a m C O W "O ~ c0 O Q cts V t~ T N O p C rn O Q 2 ° i~a° o c~~>co~sa L ° a ' ~- o~ ° ~c E c i~ ~ n m • o • d' • C, D, E,F,G 399 • C • . . . . ~ ~ ~ o ~~ ~;:, r ~ t ~ v ,„ -~~ ~_ , =-- 0 0 ' a a o o Q Q Q ~~, O Q ~ O a N o a ~ 0 ~ . ~,. ~~°~ C C C _ _ O O O • O O O O ~' U U U N N N ~ _ C N C to C N O O O O O O _ O O O O • U "~ m m D ~ . ~ ~, - U U U ~ 7~NM ' 4 • ^ U m U U m m m 'p L O ~ "p to O N ~ ~ ~ ~ > O O O O (Lf >, L any ~ . ; ~ "O O L L ~ C c~ o - ~ O ~ ~ "O to C p ~ ~ 0- O `~ O> j ~ to O "O ~ c ~ U C O ~ y ~ ~ _ O ~ O ~ d- m ~~ ~ ~= C N C~~ U U c0 ~ ~ ~ O O ?' • ~ ~ ~~ N ~ U _ ~ ~~ O~ 0 O O ~~ O> N O L ~ CO ~~ .r U 'O •-. O U~ O ~ "p m O O O C U -C d 0 "-' i Q O -p C~ U O ~ o co O~ m~~~ L ~- ~~ "J ~ C C m~ ~_ U~ mU c o ~ ~ ~ O U C ~ ~ ~ ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ O- O O O ~ ~ ~ U Q ~ ~'~ ~ U vi ~ ~ ~ O ~ Q ~ 'J ~ ~ 0- ~ °o E: ca~~~~o - C ~a ~~~ mcna~ ~~ m „ >.oc~ L L ~ C~ O a i ~ m ~~ ~a~ Q N O ~~ O C N C ~ ~ ~... O r ~ ~ ~ U U ~ ~ >. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ E L ~ ~ O ~ p O O CO ~ E: ~' N (~ ~ ~ " ~ ~ ~ O " O C ~ L > !n C ~ E: ~ (~ v~~`- ~a~~oL~ ~° O QU o ~ ~ O O o ~ C mom- oo O_ ~•-~a~ O .o Q ~ O O ~ N ~ O C O ~ U ~ p ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ crI ~ ~ A ~ ~ Q O - O~ O ~ O 'C ~~ ~ ~ ~ j ~ ~ 0 0_ ~ ~ ), in 'C .`+ v 0~ y d' O ~ O - > L Q U ~ ~ CJ - ~ p ` i O ~ C L - ~ C c~ .--. >' C O E ~-- N ~ Q ~ ~- ~ O ~ .D N ~ O C ~ O N L C6 CO E: N ~ tt~ ~ C~ f~ ~ _O In C (~ C O ~ y D1 i ~ Q O i~ ~ U ~ O N C ~ O p ~ U ' to ~ O ~ ~ O -O ~ O. O O ~ .L-~ (!) >, ~ cn ~ U ~ N ~ C n ~ RS ~ O ~ ~ "O r O~ .... O -O ~ ~ U ~ O O) 7 C O ~ ~ O Q- c0 C _ 0 0~ -a ` C' N ~ ~ ~ ~ N "O d~ ' O c0 ~ Q O E: ~ O O Q X ~ • ~ Q E ~ ~ ~ ~ C ~ ~ >, Q O C~ C O E: C~ ] ~ ~ ~ m Q O O c ~ ? O O O _ _ fn O C i O ~~ QS C ~ U O , ~ O Q O p e~ _ In (~ U/ l1 ~ ~ O~ O O ~~ Q O E "O Cn O N '_ ~~ ~ "O c~ U C/~ U U ~ © O N Q L U C O y y ~ ~~ ^ ^ ^ ^ rv C'3 ~ I- ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ LL ~ O O O O U' ~ 0 C, D, E,F,G 400 ~ v ~ ~ d' N N N N , ~ ~ a a a a 0 Q ~ ~. a U ~ O O O O ~ ~ ~ N ~; N ~ N O O ~ U - N ~ N CL ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ • U m m m m m m m m m ~ o o ~ ~>,~ ~o C ~ o-o o~ o~o~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ a~ ~~ o ~ N ~ o ~ m u ~ ~ ~ ~ iZ ~ U ~ ~ _ p ~ L cn ~ O U ~ O ~ O p Q ,C ~ Q ~ ,~~ C p O ~ ctS ~ U O ~ .L -~ D d O O U U O Q m ~ C ~ ~ ~- c~ ~ O E E C •.~' O O E~ O O t to U - _ ~ ~~ U "O ~ C O E ~ in O ~ ~ D O ~ U O. O LO ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ C ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .fl O ~ a in O O ~ C ip . uj ~ Cn ~ O ~ Q. ~ O ~ O ~ ~ ~ N O ~ ~ ~ ~ O O C ~ ~ ~ ~ V ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ "- ~ ~ ~ ~ p ~ ~ ~ ~ p ~ C ~ ~ p ~ O ~ ~ C O O N ~ ~~ m a~ ~ C (~ O) ~ N C (0 S ~ ~ ~ m Q U ~ N ~ ~ ~ O ~ C ~ ~ `~~ ~ m m o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~' m Y O Y- ~ `~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ ` ~~ ~ m O s o -Q N C U ctl .Q ~ ~ ~ ~ C N O m~~ O~ ~ O .,- ci O _ cn O cn ~, i C C fn O i N C O~ i p~~ O Q ~ - > cn U ciS L- ~ O i~ U~~ O ZT N - ~ ~ (~ 0 0 'p U O C cn "O U p C "" O N O cif p ~ ~ p ~ to ~ -p U C C O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ rT ~ ~ U ~ O _ ~ ~ O (SS in ~ O L i o to ~ ~ C T ctS +- CD cn E ~ ~ ~ O ~ ~ O O~ U U U _C O C (~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O N ~ ~' O ~ ~ ~ p C O O ~ ~ C= O U O ~ ~ ~ ct3 ~ CD ..C d U U "r O O) O ~ N ~ ~ C O U X ~ .O L «s O cn f O ~ ~ C m C C Q ~ C ~ ~ ~ Q ~ C "O d~ O O O~ ~ ~ ~ - ~ ~ c ~ N ~ C ~ C Q In U ~ , - O - in E V V O _ W U O 7 ~ (0 >+ C "p A N C ~ ~ C -O L U ~ C C O C Cif .C ~ ~ ~ ~ U ~ ~ 2 ~ cif (if ~ cis C O O d ~ L ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ C ~_ L ~ C N p _ C U Q ~ Q O "a ~ ~ O ~ Q ~ O OU ~ ~ C 7 cn ~ can ~ N ~ O C O O U it3 O c~ U t > n _ • ~ • • C,D,E,F,G 401 • • • . . N N N N N • ' a a a a U ~ - a Q a a n. • 0 0 0 0 0 3 ~ a m ~ i a a i i i a a>> ai ai ~ a>> ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . , m m m m m . . m m m • U U ~ ~ j ~ O O ~ y O ~ O ~ ~ d ~ ~ ~ ~ N ~ ~ O_ c~ ~ ~ ~ C ~ ~ , . O Q ~ ~ U Z O c>~ O O U O ~ ~ ~ ~ O p- ~ ~ ~ O ~ ~ C N c~ O~ U a7 U U ~~~ O O ~ p 0 O N Vi O O > U O (~ N~ L~ U ~ ll ~^~ in ~ -p ~ N OHO U ~~ Q ~ Q C~(n ~ U O..QpL- ~ O N QN Q'fn O p~ C O O CO- >+C C°4 C ~ ~ ~ -O~ D7O ~LLJ~+.~ Od C (0 m>> ~ ~ z ~ ~U CC"~ ~ ~ ~~ ~E c~fl C (0 Q'O ~ C p ~ O ~ U ~ ~ ~ Z O N ~ O _O ~ ~ O~ J _ ~ (d f0 >i ~ L ~ O ~ C'~ C ..O 7 ~ ~ L ~ ~ C J ~ ~ N . O. ~ CO ~ ~ ~ x N p ~ ` '~ ~ C L cn N L -_ O ` ~ .C ~ ~ C C ~ °~ ° ~ ~ "p "-' o C o ~ ~ c0 Q- U ~ N ~-~ ~ ~ i~ p O O ~ ~ ~ ~ 3 ~~ W O ~ ~ ~ ° c ~ ~ ° ° ~ a i c ~ - ~_ C ~ °~ ~~~ ` -° o ~a°i a~ ~ `~~ ~ ~ i - a ~ ~a ~ o ~~ ~ °~ ~ - a~i ~ O_ O7 O) U i ~ o ca !n -p (SS to L. E C O) O- _ ~ C i O X N ~ > ~ -_ ~ p C ' -° Z N +-" i >+ N ~ ~ C C6 CO ~ > N ~ ~ > Q O C ' • C ~ O ~ O C ~ ~ O ~ ~ > 7 ~ c O ~ ~ O ~ LLl -d "= ~ ~ O ~ O p ~ O ~ O N ~ m U -O ~ '~ O ~ ~= CC ~ O C~~ ,~ 7 C c0 "p N -p U V~ O " ~ O7 O O O >, U ''' ~ C to ~ C ~ i O~ p C~ ~~~ 0~ O ~ C ~ ~ i-~ L ~ C ~ Q ttS U~~ C O Q lA O O O U U ~ C O~ C CC E U U C O ~~ c .. Z ( ~ ~ ~ ~ -p O' 7 w ~ L ~ O Q ~ ~ N~ O ~ O C p -p j L Q- -O E c~ O C U .-. 0 7 _ N L ~ W C U O C U C ~ O~ O O C ~ +-~ ~ c0 J . -- O O ~ a O~ ~ "c~ E~ ~ ~ c~ N p~ X ~o>° ~°EU y N~ O ~ m O 7 U ~ O C>~ to C ~ O C C~ O ~ U ~ N O O ~ ~ p ... C 7 y d L O- O ~ U ~ ~ p~~ ~ i i~ m C ~ - V O ~ in in N O -p ~ ~ ~ O > LL ~ ~ O ~ O > O ~ C C- ~ to N C_ ~ ~ O c N > p ~ N U ~ ~ C O Q O Q~> C v __ c0 O O c~ C _ p O O Q~_ N C N~ C- C Q O N E 0 7 0 ~ O C O O p O >, O , ~.,L..~ Q_tq c O J U ~~ O ~ ~ ~ O_ > ~ ~ O C >ia> E0~ d (l~ ~DU~ O~ooU Z Uroo rn O C, D,E,F,G 402 ~t N v N v~ N v N ' ' ~I Q V ~ U U U U Q Q i i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Q ro a ~ Q a o 0 0 O O O O U ml_ U mL U ~L N N O O C ~ L ~ O O N N 7 ~ 7 p C ~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ D U D U D U • m m m m U U U m m m m m m U lq ~ C C O C ~ C O ~ J, ~ O L Y C ~ C N > "_ > N to O O ~ . p 0 0 ~ p 0 ` C O O 'D U~ O E: ~~~ .fl O Q ~ O ~ ll E UJ i 1L0. ~ O ~ ~ N ~ ~ N (n N ~ ~ N C .-. ~ >> ~ N O ~ ~ O ~ m ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Q > ~ O > N O ~ ~ > ~ ~ ctS ~ c0 .'-' O O 'O O i ~~ ~ a~ui Uo Um~ m m L a C O~ O ~ ~ U ~ O C ~~ 0 0 " O_ O _ ~ 'J O ~ U E X p~ ~ ~ ' CO ~ ~ ~ ~ C O Q C O O ~ O . ~ ~ O E N ~ Q ~ ~ ci3 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ U . N C • O O 6 ~ C ~ +- p -O L 2i D) O ~ L ~ ~ ~ O " p O `. ~ > C •= U 7~ .C > O ~ ~ ~ O "_ m N (~ ~ ~ "~ O L O U C- O Cd U ~> 'D ~ O 6 ~ _p ~ X O "O ~ O M >+ C C 0 N 4J 7 a O O> ~ Q >~ O O C p C O 0 ~- - CLf O O~ ~ O ~ .~ N i~ c~ > 0~ 0 ~ C6 ~ ~ (n C O 0) N p -d C Q p 0~~ C O N C O~ U L f q ~ c0 L ~ ~ O C ~ O ~ U O F- C c~ 0 B O O C O U ~ L ~ C (0 m ~ O C U ~ Cn fn C V ~ O ~ ~ ~ c~ D7 N ~ ~ O p ~ - .C ~ Q ~ _ L C • Q ~ +:. U co (0 ~ U C `~ (~ O m "6 ~ __ - cq C O -O _ C C~ C r O] C C U -O ~ O O C ~ O i Y _ O ~ O -O c~ N i O p .Q N 'O O_ (~ ~ ~ _ U U C "-' ~V ~ O ~ ~ O Q '(~ T - O J (0 ~ cLf 2 U 'D C p ~ OL O - "- N ~~~ Op ~'O CO~= L ~ CLL ~L~L ypL O a " 0.... O p pQ N > ~"O Q1 C ~ O i .,.r - N O O > `- a U ~ E: CSf j ~ C~ 0 0~ O L i O C C ~ i (~ T O p~ O' ~ C~ 7 (iS ~ CO N "O -O " i O Cn Q-O y N O C 7 N ~~ N >O N }' 7 ~ ~ ~ ~ C RS - O to ` C C~~ O N ~- ~ Om n~ C C O ~~~ H O C C C C 0 0_ ULm ~ O O_~ 7m F-~~ ~ O UL C C U yr~ ~UL yL fn ~ ~ C (n f- CO • O • • C, D, E,F,G 403 • • • • ~' Q C o ~~ C N ~ C O U • m c ~ o ~ L ~ c~ .n Q ~ o O O H ~ 7 U~ X~ ~ U C "-' O~ O CTf C N O >,~O UL- d E ~ yL... C L ""~ N O cts Q c ~ "J ~ ~ Y `~ E~ ~ ~~~ ~~ O cD ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~, CSS O ~ ~ 7 ~ ~ CiS C~ p 0 C ~ L ~ L ctf ,,., •-- O In ` .~ ~ 7 ~ i O -~ -O U c~ ,~, i to ~ 'O O ~ L O O > ~~ ~+ O ~ O ~ ~ j 00~~'D Uz ~ c~~ ~OO~ o o~ ~ o ~ -O O ~ cif ~ p ~ i ~ > c c ,~ ~ - ~ ~ p c ~ c S O U i~ CO C E O N I L C C L CO O_ U~ N `_' ~- E >. ~ ~ m ' ~ U- 'O U ~ N "h 7 O C O m O ~ O O ~ O m ~ ~ m C ro U ~ O . ~ (3 U ~c ~ U ~ C i -o ~ -o o ~ ~ a~ c ,.,p~' . L L L C Y O ~ ` Y L ~ O_ 0 ro ~ its ' ,~C x ~ ~ ~ m ~ ~ U ~ ~.,<C ~kV) 'U~ N Ch '7 ~ (O I~ i. -. .~ C ro a ~., ~ ~, a~ a ro ~ o a ~ ~ C a Q ~ ~:O ~ e~C E m .~~ c a ~iL;;., ~`~ U D T U 1] 7 . c ~ Y U C/) O=_ 0) Q N L N o c ` c c v> a ~ t ro a ~ y 0 O a cn . ~ Q m U ~ _- c a~ > , ~,v a O c o ap ~' > ro o s"~ ~; ~ c ~'~; L U U o a m ri0° L_ o ° U /~Cx ~ ~ H O O ~~~' Q m U m w °~; ~' ai ~ c a~i O 0 ~ ro q, C N C N E N C ~ O) ~~~'t d O G ~ _m O ~ 'O N O N O C ~ ,p N ~ 'O ` o m O c W -mo a. o o ~ ~ c c O Q ro _o ;a' E m _ °' m U °-' =C. o ~ w -ca ~ U .Q. ~ U U m d LL N' ~ a- = p o- w 0 0 U ~ U U U m a w N C O R ., d .Q Q Y V d t U O d Y C,D,E,F,G 404 O ~~'; _ ~~' - ' d. 4~;~ ~. , COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18179 SUBJECT: SUBDIVISION OF 10 1 ACRES INTO TWO LOTS APPLICANT: ARBORS AT ROUTE 66, LLC LOCATION: NORTHEAST CORNER OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND GROVE AVENUE ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: General Requirements The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the Clty, Its agents, officers, or employees, because of the Issuance of such approval, or In the alternative, to relinquish such approval The appllcant shall reimburse the City, Its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, Its agents, officers, or employees maybe required by a court to pay as a result of such actlon The City may, at Its sole discretion, participate at Its own expense In the defense of any such actlon but such participation shall not relieve appllcant of his obligations under this condition 2 Approval of Tentative Tract No SUBTT18179 Is granted subject to the approval of Development District Amendment DRC2006-00350 and Development Review DRC2006-00341. 3 Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No 07-38, Standard Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be Included on the plans (full size) The sheet(s) are for Information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect The applicant shall be required to pay any applicable Flsh and Game fees as shown below. The project planner will confirm which fees apply to this project All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to the Planning Commission or Planning Director hearing a) Notice of Determination - $50 b) Negative Declaration - $ 1,850 • Completion Date -/-/- -/_/. -/-/- I \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2007 Res & Stf Rpt\SUB7T18179StdCond 6-27 doc C, D, E,F,G 405 Project No SUBTT18179 Completion Date B. Time Limits This tentative tract map or tentatlve parcel map shall expire, unless extended by the Pianning Commission, unless a complete final map is flied with the Clty Engineer within 3 years from the date of the approval Conditional Use Permit, Variance, or Development/Design Review approval shall explre If building permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval No extensions are allowed C. Site Development 1 The site shall be developed and maintained In accordance with the approved plans which Include site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Pianning Department, the conditions contained herein, Development Code regulations, and the Foothill Boulevard Route 66 Visual Improvement Plan 2 Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director 3 Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Building Code and State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Department to show compliance The buildings shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy 4 Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be submitted for Pianning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits 5 All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first 6 Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the time of building permit issuance 7 A detailed on-site lighting plan, including a photometric diagram, shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Director and Police Department (477-2800) prior to the issuance of building permits Such plan shall Indicate style, illumination, location, height, and method of shielding so as not to adversely affect adjacent properties. If no centralized trash receptacles are provided, all trash pick-up shall be for individual units with all receptacles shfeided from public view Trash receptacle(s) are required and shall meet Clty standards The final design, locations, and the number of trash receptacles shall be subject to Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits 10. All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc ,shall be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the Planning Director For single-family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults 11 All building numbers and Individual units shall be identified In a clear and concise manner, including proper illumination -~-~- / / / / / / I / / --- -~-~- • / / / / / / / / / / / / I \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2007 Res & Stf Rpt\SUBTT18179StdCond 6-27 doc C, D, E,F,G 406 Project No SUBTT18179 Completion Date • • D. 12 The Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) and Articles of Incorporation of the _/_/_ Homeowners' Association are subject to the approval of the Planning and Engineering Departments and the City Attorney They shall be recorded concurrently with the Final Map or prior to the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first A recorded copy shall be provided to the City Engineer The Homeowners' Association shall submit to the Planning Department a list of the name and address of their officers on or before January 1 of each and every year and whenever said information changes. 13 All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property _/_/_ owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for Planning Director and City Engineer review and approved prior to the issuance of building permits 14 The developer shall submit a construction access plan and schedule for the development of all _/_/_ lots for Planning Director and City Engineer approval, including, but not limited to, public notice requirements, special street posting, phone listing for community concerns, hours of construction activity, dust control measures, and security fencing 15. Six-foot decorative block walls shall be constructed along the project perimeter If a double wall _/_/_ condition would result, the developer shall make a good faith effort to work with the adjoining property owners to provide a single wall Developer shall notify, by mail, all contiguous property owner at least 30 days prior to the removal of any existing walls/ fences along the project's perimeter 16 Construct block walls between homes (i a ,along interior side and rear property lines), rather than _/ / wood fencing for permanence, durability, and design consistency _ _ 17. Access gates to the rear yards shall be constructed from a material more durable than wood _/_/_ gates Acceptable materials include, but are not limited to, wrought iron and PVC 18 For residential development, return walls and corner side walls shall be decorative masonry _/_/_ Parking and Vehicular Access (indicate details on building plans) 1. All parking lot landscape islands shall have a minimum outside dimension of 6 feet and shall _/_/_ contain a 12-inch walk adjacent to the parking stall (including curb) 2 Textured pedestrian pathways and textured pavement across circulation aisles shall be provided _/ / throughout the development to connect dwellings/units/buildings with open spaces/plazas/ _ _ recreational uses 3 All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles, entrances, _/_/_ and exits shall be striped per City standards 4 All units shall be provided with garage door openers if driveways are less than 18 feet in depth _/_/_ from back of sidewalk 5 Motorcycle parking area shall be provided for commercial and office facilities with 25 or more _/_/_ parking stalls Developments with over 100 parking stalls shall provide motorcycle parking at the rate of one percent The area for motorcycle parking shall be a minimum of 56 square feet 3 I \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2007 Res & Stf Rpt\SUBTT18179StdCond 6-27 doc C,D,E,F,G 407 Project No SUBTT18179 Completion Date E. Trip Reduction 1 Bicycle storage spaces shall be provided in all commercial, office, Industrial, and multifamily _/_/_ residential projects of more than 10 units Minimum spaces equal to flue percent of the required automobile parking spaces or three bicycle storage spaces, whichever Is greater After the first 50 bicycle storage spaces are provided, additional storage spaces required are 2 5 percent of the required automobile parking spaces Warehouse distribution uses shall provide bicycle storage spaces at a rate of 2 5 percent of the required automobile parking spaces with a minimum of a 3-bike rack In no case shall the total number of bicycle parking spaces required exceed 100 ' Where this results in a fraction of 0 5 or greater, the number shall be rounded off to the higher whole number. 2 Category 5 telephone cable or fiber optic cable shall be provided for office buildings and other _/_/_ non-residential development F. Landscaping 1 A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in _/_/_ the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision 2 A minimum of 20% of trees planted within industrial projects, and a minimum of 30% within _/_/_ commercial and office projects, shall be specimen size trees - 24-inch box or larger 3 Within parking lots, trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15-gallon tree for every three parking _/_/_ stalls 4 Trees shall be planted in areas of public view adjacent to and along structures at a rate of one _/_/_ tree per 30 linear feet of building . 5 All private slopes of 5 feet or more In vertical height and of 5 1 or greater slope, but less than 2 1 _/_/_ slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for erosion control Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy 6 All private slopes in excess of 5 feet, but less than 8 feet in vertical height and of 2 1 or greater _/_/_ slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as follows one 15-gallon or larger size tree per each 150 sq ft of slope area, 1-gallon or larger size shrub per each 100 sq ft of slope area, and appropriate ground cover In addition, slope banks in excess of 8 feet in vertical height and 2 1 or greater slope shall also include one 5-gallon or larger size tree per each 250 sq ft of slope area Trees and shrubs shall be planted in staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy 7 For multi-family residential and non-residential development, property owners are responsible for _/_/_ the continual maintenance of all landscaped areas on-site, as well as contiguous planted areas within the public right-of-way All landscaped areas shall be kept free from weeds and debris and maintained in healthy and thriving condition, and shall receive regular pruning, fertilizing, mowing, and trimming Any damaged, dead, diseased, or decaying plant material shall be replaced within 30 days from the date of damage 8 The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included in _/_/_ the required landscape plans and shall be subject to Planning Director review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the Engineering Department 4 I \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2007 Res & Stf Rpt\SUBTT18179StdCond 6-27 doc C, D, E,F,G 408 Project No SUBTT18179 Completion Date 9 Special landscape features such as mounding, alluvial rock, specimen size trees, meandering sidewalks (with horizontal change), and intensified landscaping, is required along Foothill Boulevard and Grove Avenue in accordance with the Foothill Boulevard Route 66 Visual Plan Improvement Plan 10 Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on the perimeter of this project area shall be continuously maintained by the developer 11 All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment If located in public maintenance areas, the design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Department 12 Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of Xeriscape as defined in Chapter 19 16 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code G. Signs The signs indicated on the submitted plans are conceptual only and not a part of this approval Any signs proposed for this development shall comply with the Sign Ordinance and shall require separate application and approval by the Planning Department prior to installation of any signs 2 A Uniform Sign Program for this development shall be submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to issuance of building permits H. Environmental 1 Noise levels shall be monitored after construction to verify the adequacy of the mitigation measures Noise levels shall be monitored by actual noise level readings taken on-and off-site A final acoustical report shall be submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to final occupancy release The final report shall also make recommendations as to additional mitigation measures to reduce noise levels to below City standards, such as, residential exterior noise levels to below 60 dBA and interior noise attenuation to below 45 dBA 2. A final acoustical report shall be submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. The final report shall discuss the level of interior noise attenuation to below 45 CNEL, the building materials and construction techniques provided, and if appropriate, verify the adequacy of the mitigation measures The building plans will be checked for conformance with the mitigation measures contained in the final report 3 The applicant shall submit certification from an acoustical engineer that all recommendations of the acoustical report were implemented in construction, including measurements of interior and exterior noise levels to document compliance with City standards Certification shall be submitted to the Building & Safety Department prior to final occupancy release of the affected homes APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: NOTE: ANY REVISIONS MAY VOID THESE REQUIREMENTS AND NECESSITATE ADDITIONAL REVIEW(S) I. General Requirements Submit five complete sets of plans including the following a Site/Plot Plan, b Foundation Plan, 5 -/_~ -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- / / -/-/- _/_/ i \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2007 Res & Stf Rpt\SUBTT18179StdCond 6-27 doc C, D, E,F,G 409 Project No SUBTT18179 Completion Date c Floor Plan, d Celling and Roof Framing Plan, e Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of the main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams, f Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams, water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning, and g Planning Department Project Number (SUBTT18179) clearly identified on the outside of all plans 2 energy conservation calculations, and a soils report. Submit two sets of structural calculations / / , Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are required prior to plan check submittal _ _ _ 3 Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers' Compensation coverage to / / _ _ _ the City prior to permit issuance 4 Separate permits are required for fencing and/or walls _/_/_ J. Site Development 1 Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction All plans shall be _/_/_ marked with the project file number (SUBTT18179) The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted California Codes, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application Contact the Building and Safety Department for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts 2 Prior to issuance of building permits for a new residential project or mayor addition, the applicant /_/ shall pay development fees at the established rate Such fees may include, but are not limited to _ _ City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Check Fees, Construction and Demolition Diversion Program deposit and fees and School Fees Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Building and Safety Department prior to permit issuance 3 Street addresses shall be provided by the Building and Safety Official after tract/parcel map _/_/_ recordation and prior to issuance of building permits 4 Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m Monday /_/ through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays _ _ 5 Construct trash enclosure(s) per City Standard (available at the Planning Department's public _/_/_ counter) 6 Submit pool plans to the County of San Bernardino's Environmental Health Services Department _/_/_ for approval K. New Structures 1 Provide compliance with the California Building Code (CBC) for property line clearahces _/_/_ considering use, area, and fire-resistiveness 2 Provide compliance with the California Building Code for required occupancy separations /_/ _ _ 3 Roofing material shall be installed per the manufacturer's "high wind" instructions _/_/_ 6 I \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2007 Res & Stf Rpt\SUBTT18179StdCond 6-27 doc • • • C, D, E,F,G 410 Protect No SUBTT18179 Completion Date 4 Provide draft stops in attic areas, not to exceed 3,000 square feet, in accordance with CBC _/_/_ Section 1505 5 Provide draft stops In attics in line with common walls _/_/_ 6 Exterior walls shall be constructed of the required fire rating in accordance with CBC Table 5-A _/_/_ 7. Openings in exterior walls shall be protected In accordance with CBC Table 5-A _/_/_ 8 If the area of habitable space above the first floor exceeds 3,000 square feet, then the _/_/_ construction type shall be V-1 Hour minimum 9 Walls and floors separating dwelling units in the same building shall be not less than 1-hour _/_1 _ fire-resistive construction. L. Grading 1 Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with California Building Code, City Grading _/_/_ Standards, and accepted grading practices The final grading plan shall be In substantial conformance with the approved grading plan 2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to _/_/_ perform such work 3 A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the _/_/_ time of application for grading plan check. 4. The final grading plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, _/_/_ submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of building permits • 5. A separate grading plan check submittal Is required for all new construction protects and for _/_/_ existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fell The grading plan shall be prepared, stamped, and signed by a California registered Civil Engineer M. Additional Requirements/Comments 1 The protect shall fully comply with accessibility requirements of 2001 California Building Code _/_/_ Chapter 11 A (Housing Accessibility) APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: N. Dedication and Vehicular Access 1 Rights-of-way and easements shall be dedicated to the City for all Interior public streets, / / community trails, public paseos, public landscape areas, street trees, traffic signal encroachment _ _ _ and maintenance, and public drainage faculties as shown on the plans and/or tentative map Private easements for non-public facilities (cross-lot drainage, local feeder trails, etc) shall be reserved as shown on the plans and/or tentative map 2 Dedication shall be made of the following rights-of-way on the perimeter streets (measured from _/_/_ street centerline) 60 total feet on Foothill Boulevard _/_/_ 44 total feet on Grove Avenue / / _ _ _ 7 I \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2007 Res & Stf Rpt\SUBTT18179StdCond 6-27 doc C, D, E,F,G 411 Project No SUBTT18179 Completion Date 3 Corner property Ilne cutoffs shall be dedicated per Clty Standards 4 Reciprocal access easements shall be provided ensuring access to all parcels by CC&Rs or by deeds and shall be recorded concurrently with the map or prior to the issuance of building permits, where no map Is involved 5 Reciprocal parking agreements for all parcels and maintenance agreements ensuring point maintenance of all common roads, drives, or parking areas shall be provided by CC & R's or deeds and shall be recorded prior to, or concurrent with, the final parcel map 6 All existing easements lying within future rights-of-way shall bequit-claimed or delineated on the final map Easements for public sidewalks and/or street trees placed outside the public right-of-way shall be dedicated to the City O. Street Improvements All public improvements (interior streets, drainage facilities, communitytrails, paseos, landscaped areas, etc) shown on the plans and/or tentative map shall be constructed to City Standards Interior street improvements shall include, but are not limited to, curb and gutter, AC pavement, drive approaches, sidewalks, street lights, and street trees Pursuant to City Council Resolution No 88-557, no person shall make connections from a source of energy, fuel or power to any building service equipment which is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Council, except that in developments containing more than one building or unit, the development may have energy connections made to a percentage of those buildings, or units proportionate to the completion of Improvements as required by conditions of approval of development In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings or units be connected to energy prior to completion and acceptance of all Improvements required by these conditions of approval of development 3 Construct the following perimeter street improvements Including, but not limited to: Street Name Curb & Gutter A.C. Pvmt Side- walk Drive Appr. Street Lights Street Trees Comm Trad Medan Island Bike Trad Other Foothill Boulevard X X (c) X X (d) Grove Avenue X X X X Red HIII Country Club Drive X X X X X Notes (a) Median island includes landscaping and Irrigation on meter (b) Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check (c) If so marked, sidewalk shall be curvilinear per Standard 114 (d) If so marked, an in-lieu of construction fee shall be provided for this item 4 Improvement Plans and Construction Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and Intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the Clty Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first / / -/-/- / / / / / / / / / / / / -/-~ 8 I \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2007 Res & Stf Rpt\SUBTT18179StdCond 6-27 doc C, D, E,F,G 412 Protect No SUBTT18179 Completion Date b Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a _/_/_ construction permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office in addition to any other permits required c Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and _/_/_ interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer d Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction _/_/_ project along mayor or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer Notes 1) Pull boxes shall be No 6 at intersections and No 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer 2) Conduit shall be 3-inch galvanized steel with pull rope or as specified e Handicapped access ramps shall be installed on all corners of intersections per City _/_/_ Standards or as directed by the City Engineer f Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with _/_/_ adequate detours during construction Street or lane closure permits are required A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer g Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks Under sidewalk drains shall be _/ / installed to City Standards, except for single family residential lots _ _ h Street names shall be approved by the Planning Director prior to submittal for first plan _/ / • check _ _ 5 Stre et trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in _/_/_ accordance with the City's street tree program ti I \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2007 Res & Stf Rpt\SUBTT18179StdCond 6-27 doc C, D,E,F,G 413 Project No SUBTT18179 Completion Date 6 Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows The completed legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on sheet_(typically sheet 1) " Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans The City Engineer reserves the right to adjust tree species based upon field conditions and other variables For additional information, contact the Project Engineer Min Grow Street Name Botanical Name Common Name Space Spacing Size ~ty Foothill Boulevard Non-Activity Centers - Prunus Blireiana NCN 3 ft 20 ft o c - 15-gal Fill-in Accent Tree Informal groupings not more than 25% of total frontage trees Non-Activity Centers Platanus racemosa California Sycamore 8 ft 35 ft o c - 15-gal Informal groupings Non-Activity Centers Platanus acerifolia London Plane Tree 30 ft o c - 15-gal Informal rou in s Tree Wells Lagerstroemia Pink Crape Myrtle 3 ft Per tree well 24-inch indica "Tuscarora" design box Grove Avenue Hymenosprorum Sweetshade 5 ft 20 fl o c 15-gal flavum Red Hill CC Drive N/o Foothill Boulevard Platanus acerifolia London Plane Tree 8 ft 30 ft 15-gal Construction Notes for Street Trees 1) All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City inspector Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill soil amendments, as determined by the City inspector 3) All street trees are subject to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Department 4) Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only 7 Intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with adopted policy On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all project intersections, including driveways Local residential street intersections and commercial or industrial driveways may have lines of sight plotted as required P. Public Maintenance Areas 1 A signed consent and waiver form to loin and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the Clty Engineer prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits whichever occurs first Formation costs shall be borne by the developer 2 Parkway landscaping on the following street(s) shall conform to the results of the respective Beautification Master Plan Foothill Boulevard 10 / / / / / / / / • • I \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2007 Res & Stf Rpt\SUBTT18179StdCond 6-27 doc C, D, E,F,G 414 Project No SUBTT18179 Completion Date Q. Drainage and Flood Control 1 The project (or portions thereof) is located within a Flood Hazard Zone, therefore, flood protection measures shall be provided as certified by a registered Civil Engineer and approved by the City Engineer It shall be the developer's responsibility to have the current FIRM Zone AO designation removed from the project area The developer shall provide drainage and/or flood protection facilities sufficient to obtain an unshaded "X" designation The developer's engineer shall prepare all necessary reports, plans, and hydrologic/hydraulic calculations A Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) shall be obtained from FEMA prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first A Letter of Map Revision (LOMB) shall be Issued by FEMA prior to occupancy or improvement acceptance, whichever occurs first 3. A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the Clty Engineer prior to final map approval or the Issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first All drainage faculties shall be installed as required by the City Engineer 4 A permit from the San Bernardino County Flood Control District is required for work within its right-of-way Trees are prohibited within 5 feet of the outside diameter of any public storm drain pipe measured from the outer edge of a mature tree trunk R. Utilities 1 The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. 2 Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the • Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVW D), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino A letter of compliance from the CVW D Is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits In the case of all other residential projects S. General Requirements and Approvals A non-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all new streetlights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to building permit issuance if no map is involved Prior to the issuance of building permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program The deposit is fully refundable if at least 50% of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City Form CD-1 shall be submitted to the Engineering Department when the first building permit application Is submitted to Building and Safety Form CD-2 shall be submitted to the Engineering Department within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition project APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DEPARTMENT, FIRE PROTECTION PLANNING SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: SEE ATTACHED 11 -/-/- -/-/- _/_/ -/-/- -/-/- / / -/-/- -/-/. -/-/- I \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2007 Res & Stf Rpt\SUBTT18179StdCond 6-27 doc C,D,E,F,G 415 f,F ~,.bo~oALL ~. Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District ,$ u $ Fire Construction Services STANDARD CONDITIONS August 16, 2006 Arbors at Route 66 Charles Joseph & Associates 8212 Red Hill County Club Drive Mixed Use Subdivision SUBTT18179 & DRC2006-00341 THE FOLLOWING STANDARD CONDITIONS APPLY TO THIS PROJECT. The RCFPD Procedures & Standards which are referenced in this document can be access on the web at http //www ci.rancho-Cucamonga ca us/fire/index htm under the Fire Safety Division & Fire Construction Services section. Search by article; the preceding number of the standard refers to the article Chose the appropriate article number then a drop down menu will appear, select the corresponding standard. FSC-1 Public and Private Water Supply Design guidelines for Fire Hydrants: The following provides design guidelines for the spacing and location of fire hydrants: a The maximum distance between fire hydrants in commercial/industrial projects is 300 feet. No portion of the exterior wall shall be located more than 150 feet from an approved fire hydrant. For cul-de-sacs, the distance shall not exceed 100 feet b. The maximum distance between fire hydrants in multi-family residential projects is 400 feet No portion of the exterior wall shall be located more than 200 feet from an approved fire hydrant. For cul-de-sacs, the distance shall not exceed 150 feet The maximum distance between fire hydrants in single-family residential projects is 500 feet. No portion of the exterior wall facing the addressed street shall be more than 250 feet from an approved fire hydrant. For cul-de-sacs, the distance shall not exceed 200 feet. d For single-family residential projects in the designated Hazardous Fire Area, the maximum distance between fire hydrants is 400 feet No portion of the exterior wall facing the addressed street shall be more than 200 feet from an approved fire hydrant. For cul-de-sacs, the distance shall not exceed 150 feet e Fire hydrants are to be located The preferred locations for fire hydrants are. C, D, E,F,G 416 i. At the entrance(s) to a commercial, industrial or residential protect from the public roadways. i~. At intersections • iii. On the right side of the street, whenever practical and possible iv. As required by the Fire Safety Division to meet operational needs of the Fire District. v A minimum of forty feet (40') from any building f. If any portion of a facility or building is located more than 150 feet from a public fire hydrant measured on an approved route around the exterior of the facility or building, additional private or public fire hydrants and mains capable of supplying the required fire flow shall be provided g Provide one fire hydrant for each 1,000 gpm of required fire flow or fraction thereof. FSC-2 Fire Flow 1. The required fire flow for this protect is 1,500 gallons per minute at a minimum residual pressure of 20-pounds per square inch This requirement is made in accordance with Fire Code Appendix III-A, as adopted by the Fire District Ordinances. 2. The required minimum fire flow for this protect, when automatic fire sprinklers are installed is 1500gallons per minute at a minimum residual pressure of 20-pounds per square inch This flow reflects a 50-percent reduction for the installation of an approved automatic fire sprinkler system in accordance with NFPA 13 or 13R with central station monitoring This requirement is made in accordance with the California Fire Code Appendix III-A, as adopted by the Fire District Ordinances. 3 The required minimum fire flow for structures located in the designated hazardous fire area shall be not less than 1,750 gpm at 20-psi residual For structures in excess of 36,000 square feet use CFC Table A-III-A-1 4. Public fire hydrants located within a 500-foot radius of the proposed protect may be used to provide the required fire flow subtect to Fire District review and approval Private fire hydrants on adtacent property shall not be used to provide required fire flow. 5 Firewater plans are required for all protects that must extend the existing water supply to or onto the site Building permits will not be issued until fire protection water plans are approved. 6 On all site plans to be submitted for review, show all fire hydrants located within 600 feet of the proposed protect site FSC-3 Prerequisite for submittal of Overhead Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems Prior to submitting plans for an overhead automatic fire sprinkler system, the applicant shall submit plans, specifications and calculations for the fire sprinkler system underground supply piping Approval of the underground supply piping system must be obtained prior to submitting the overhead fire sprinkler system plans 2 C, D, E,F,G 417 FSC-4 Requirements for Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems Rancho Cucamonga Fire District Ordinance 15, the 2001 California Fire Code and/or any other applicable standards require an approved automatic fire sprinkler system to be installed in. Commercial or industrial structures greater than 7,500 square feet. 2. Group "A" Occupancies. 3. "E" Occupancies with an occupant load of 50 or more persons 4 Multi-family residential structures in excess of 4 units 5. All structures that do not meet Fire District access requirements (see Fire Access) 6. When required fire flow cannot be provided due to inadequate volume or pressure. 7. When the building access does not meet the requirements of the 2001 California Building Code and the RCFPD Fire Department Access -Fire Lane Standard #9-7. 8. When any applicable code or standard requires the structure to be sprinklered. FSC-5 Fire Alarm System 1 RCFPD Ordinance 15, based on use or floor area (or by other adopted codes or standards) requires an automatic and/or manual fire alarm system Refer to RCFPD Ordinances 15 and 39, the California Building Code, RCFPD Fire Alarm Standard #10-6 and/or the California Fire Code 2. Prior to installation of the building fire alarm system, Fire Construction Services' plan check approval and a building permit must be obtained. Plans and specifications shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services m accordance with RCFPD Fire Alarm Standard #10-6 FSC-6 Fire District Site Access Fire District access roadways include public roads, streets and highways, as well as private roads, streets drive aisles and/or designated fire lanes Please reference the RCFPD Fire Department Access - Fire Lanes Standard #9-7 1. Location of Access. All portions of the structures 1st story exterior wall shall be located within 150 feet of Fire District vehicle access, measure on an approved route around the exterior of the building Landscaped areas, unpaved changes in elevation, gates and fences are deemed obstructions 2 Specifications for private Fire District access roadways per the RCFPD Standards are• a. The minimum unobstructed width is 26 feet b. The maximum inside turn radius shall be 24 feet. c The minimum outside turn radius shall be 50 feet. d The minimum radius for cul-de-sacs is 45 feet 3 C, D,E,F,G 418 e. The minimum vertical clearance is 14 feet, 6 inches f. At any private entry median, the minimum width of traffic lanes shall be 20 feet on each side. g. The angle of departure and approach shall not exceed 9 degrees or 20 percent h. The maximum grade of the driving surface shall not exceed 12 percent i. Support a minimum load of 70,000 pounds gross vehicle weight (GVW). I Trees and shrubs planted adJacent to the fire lane shall be kept trimmed to a minimum of 14 feet, 6 inches from the ground up Vegetation shall not be allowed to obstruct Fire Department apparatus. 3. Access Doorways: Approved doorways, accessible without the use of a ladder, shall be provided as follows. a. In buildings without high-piled storage, access shall be provided in accordance with the 2001 California Building Code, Fire and/or any other applicable standards b. In buildings with high-piled storage access doors shall be provided in each 100 lineal feet or mayor fraction thereof, of the exterior wall that faces the required access roadways. When railways are installed provisions shall be made to maintain Fire District access to all required openings. 4 Access Walkways: Hardscaped access walkways shall be provided from the fire apparatus access road to all required building exterior openings 5 Commercial/Industrial Gates. Any gate installed across a Fire Department access road shall be in accordance with Fire District Standard #9-2. The following design requirements apply: a. The gate shall be motorized and slide open horizontally or swing inward. b. All gates must open at the rate of one second for each one-foot of required width c When fully open, the minimum width shall be 20 feet. d. Gates are not required to be motorized 6 Residential gates installed across Fire District access roads shall be installed in accordance with RCFPD Residential Gate Standard #9-1 The following design requirements apply: a All automatic gates shall be provided with a Fire District approved, compatible traffic pre-emption device The devices shall be digital. Analog devices are not acceptable. Devices shall be installed in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions and specrfications b Vehicle access gates shall be provided with an approved Fire District Knox Key Switch c. The key switch shall be located outside and immediately adjacent to the gate for use in the event that the traffic pre-emption device fails to operate d A traffic loop device must be installed to allow exiting from the complex e. The gate shall remain in the open position for not less than 20 minutes and shall automatically reset 4 C, D, E,F,G 419 7. Fire Lane Identification: Red curbing and/or signage shall identify the fire lanes. A site plan illustrating the proposed delineation that meets the minimum Fire District standards shall be • included in the architectural plans submitted to B&S for approval. 8. Approved Fire Department Access: Any approved mitigation measures must be clearly noted on the site plan. A copy of the approved Alternative Method application, if applicable, must be reproduced on the architectural plans submitted to B&S for plan review 9 Roof Access: There shall be a means of fire department access •from the exterior walls of the buildings on to the roofs of all commeraal, industrial and multi-family residential structures with roofs less than 75 feet above the level of the fire access road a. This access must be reachable by either fire department ground ladders or by an aerial ladder. b. A minimum of one ladder point with a fixed ladder shall be provided in buildings with construction features, or high parapets that inhibit roof access. c. The number of ladder points may be required to be increased, depending on the building size and configuration. d. Regardless of the parapet height or construction features the approved ladder point shall be identified in accordance to the roof access standard. e Where the entire roof access is restricted by high parapet walls or other obstructions, a permanently mounted access ladder is required. • f. Multiple access ladders may be required for larger buildings. g. Ladder construction must be in accordance with the RCFPD Roof Access Standard 9-9 Appendix A and drawings 9-9a and 9-9b. h. A site plan showing the locations of the roof ladder shall be submitted during plan check. i Ladder points shall face a fire access roadway(s) FSC-9 Single-family Residential Sales Model homes require approved Fire District vehicle access and water supply from a public or private water main system before construction FSC-10 Occupancy and Hazard Control Permits Listed are those Fire Code permits commonly associated with the business operations and/or building construction. Plan check submittal is required with the permit application for approval of the permit, field inspection is required prior to permit issuance General Use Permit shalt be required for any activity or operation not specifically described below, which in the judgment of the Fire Chief is likely to produce conditions that may be hazardous to life or property • Magnesium Working • Application of Flammable Finishes • Candles and open flames in assemblies ~• Compressed Gases • Public Assembly • Dry Cleaning Plants public Flammable and Combustible Liquids Hazardous Materials Tents, Canopies and/or Air Supported Structures Liquefied Petroleum Gases LPG or Gas Fuel Vehicles in Assembly Buildings 5 C, D, E,F,G 420 FSC-11 Hazardous Materials -Submittal to the County of San Bernardino The San Bernardino County Fire Department shall review your Business Emergency/Contingency Plan for compliance with minimum standards Contact the San Bernardino County Fire, Hazardous Materials Division at (909) 387-4631 for forms and assistance The County Fire Department is the Cal/EPA Certified Unified Program Agency (CUPA) for the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 1. If the facility is a NEW business, a Certificate of Occupancy issued by Building & Safety will not be finalized until the San Bernardino County Fire Department reviews your Business Emergency/Contingency Plan California Government Code, Section 65850 2 prohibits the City from issuing a final Certificate of Occupancy unless the applicant has met or is meeting speafic hazardous materials disclosure requirements. A Risk Management Program (RMP) may also be required if regulation substances are to be used or stored at the new facility 2 Any business that operates on rented or leased property which is required to submit a Plan, is also required to submit a notice to the owner of the property in writing stating that the business is subject to the Business Emergency/Contingency Plan mandates and has complied with the provisions The tenant must provide a copy of the Plan to the property owner within five (5) working days, if requested by the owner FSC-12 Hazardous Materials -Submittal to Fire Construction Services Plans shall be submitted and approved prior to construction equipment designed to store, use or dispense hazardou 2001 California Building, Fire, Mechanical, Plumbing, Electrical FD39 and other implemented and/or adopted standards FSC-13 Alternate Method Application of buildings and/or the installation of s materials in accordance with the Codes, RCFPD Ordinances FD15 and Fire Construction Services staff and the Fire Marshal will review all requests for alternate method, when submitted. The request must be submitted on the Fire District "Application for Alternate Method" form along with supporting documents and payment of the $92 review fee. FCS-14 Map Recordation RECIPROCAL AGREEMENTS for Fire Department Emergency Access and Water Supply are required on this project The project appears to be located on a property that is being subdivided The reciprocal agreement is required to be recorded between property owners and the Fire District The recorded agreement shall include a copy of the site plan. The Fire Construction Services shall approve the agreement, prior to recordation The agreement shall be recorded with the County of San Bernardino, Recorders Office. Reciprocal access agreement -Please provide a permanent access agreement between the owners granting irrevocable and anon-exclusive easement, favoring the Fire District to gain access to the subject property The agreement shall include a statement that no obstruction, gate, fence, building or other structure shall be placed within the dedicated access, without Fire Department approval. The agreement shall have provisions for emergency situations and the assessing of cost recovery to the property by the fire District 6 • C, D, E,F,G 421 Reciprocal water covenant -Please provide a permanent maintenance and service covenant between the owners granting an irrevocable and non-exclusive easement, favoring the Fire District for the purpose of accessing and maintaining the private water mains, valves and fire hydrants (fire protection systems facilities in general) The covenant shall have provisions for emergency situations and the assessing of cost recovery to the property by the fire District. FCS-15 Annexation of the parcel map: Annexation of the parcel map into the Community Facilities District #85-1 or #88-1 is required prior to the issuance of grading or building permits. Chronological Summary of RCFPD Standard Conditions PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS -Please complete the following prior to the issuance of any building permits: 1. Private Water Supply (Fire) Systems: The applicant shall submit construction plans, specifications, flow test data and calculations for the private water main system for review and approval by the Fire District Plans and installation shall comply with Fire District Standards. Approval of the on-site (private) fire underground and water plans is required prior to any building permit issuance for any structure on the site. Private on-site combination domestic and fire supply system must be designed m accordance with RCFPD Standards # 9-4, #10-2 and #10-4. The Building & Safety Division and Fire Construction Services will perform plan checks and inspections. All private on-site fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable prior to delivering any combustible framing materials to the site. Fire construction Services will inspect the installation, witness hydrant flushing and grant a clearance before lumber is dropped 2. Public Water Supply (Domestic/Fire) Systems: The applicant shall submit a plan showing the locations of all new public fire hydrants for the review and approval by the Fire District and CVWD On the plan, show all existing fire hydrants within a 600-foot radius of the protect Please reference the RCFPD Water Plan Submittal Procedure Standard # 9-8 All required public fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable prior to delivering any combustible framing materials to the site CVWD personnel shall inspect the installation and witness the hydrant flushing Fire Construction Services shall inspect the site after acceptance of the public water system by CVWD. Fire Construction Services must grant a clearance before lumber is dropped. 3 Fuel Modification Plans. Please refer to RCFPD Summary of Fire Hazardous Area requirements. 4 Construction Access The access roads must be paved in accordance with all the requirements of the RCFPD Fire Lane Standard #9-7 All temporary utilities over access roads must be installed at least 14 feet 6 inches above the finished surface of the road 5 Fire Flow A current fire flow letter from CVWD must be received The applicant is responsible for obtaining the fire flow information from CVWD and submitting the letter to Fire Construction Services 7 C, D, E,F,G 422 6. Easements and Reciprocal Agreements: All easements and agreements must be recorded with the County of San Bernardino • PRIOR TO THE RELEASE OF TEMPORARY POWER The building construction must be substantially completed in accordance with Fire Construction Services' "Temporary Power Release Checklist and Procedures". PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY OR FINAL INSPECTION -Please complete the following: Hydrant Markers. All fire hydrants shall have a blue reflective pavement marker indicating the fire hydrant location on the street or driveway in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Standard Plan 134, "Installation of Reflective Hydrant Markers" On private property, the markers shall be installed at the centerline of the fire access road, at each hydrant location. 2. Private Fire Hydrants: For the purpose of final acceptance, a licensed sprinkler contractor, in the presence of Fire Construction Services, shall conduct a test of the most hydraulically remote on-site fire hydrants. The underground fire line contractor, developer and/or owner are responsible for hiring the company to perform the test. A final test report shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services verifying the fire flow available The fire flow available must meet or exceed the required fire flow in accordance with the California Fire Code 3. Fire Sprinkler System: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler system(s) shall be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services 4. Fire Sprinkler Monitoring• Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler • monitoring system must be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services. The fire sprinkler monitoring system shall be installed, tested and operational immediately following the completion of the fire sprinkler system (subject to the release of power) 5. Fire Suppression Systems and/or other special hazard protection systems shall be inspected, tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services before occupancy is granted and/or equipment is placed in service. 6 Fire Alarm System• Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire alarm system shall be installed, inspected, tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services 7 Access Control Gates• Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, vehicular gates must be inspected, tested and accepted in accordance with RCFPD Standards #9-1 or #9-2 by Fire Construction Services. 8. Fire Access Roadways: Prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, the fire access roadways must be installed in accordance with the approved plans and acceptable to Fire Construction Services. The CC&R's, the reciprocal agreement and/or other approved documents shall be recorded and contain an approved fire access roadway map with provisions that prohibit parking, specify the method of enforcement and identifies who is responsible for the required annual inspections and the maintenance of all required fire access roadways 8 C, D, E,F,G 423 9 Address: Prior to the granting of occupancy, single-family dwellings shall post the address with minimum 4-inch numbers on a contrasting background The numbers shall be internally or externally illuminated during periods of darkness The numbers shall be visible from the street. When building setback from the public roadway exceeds 100 feet, additional 4-inch numbers shall be displayed at the property entry 10. Address: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, commercial/industrial and multi- family buildings shall post the address with minimum 8-inch numbers on contrasting background, visible from the street and electrically illuminated during periods of darkness. When the building setback exceeds 200 feet from the public street, an additional non-illuminated 6-inch minimum number address shall be provided at the property entrance. Larger address numbers will be required on buildings located on wide streets or built with large setbacks in multi-tenant commercial and industrial buildings. The suite designation numbers and/or letters shall be provided on the front and back of all suites 11. Hazardous Materials. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the applicant must demonstrate (m writing from the County) that the facility has met or is meeting the Risk Management Plan (RMP) or Business Emergency/Contingency Plan with the San Bernardino County Fire Department, Hazardous Materials/Emergency Response and Enforcement Division The applicant must also obtain inspection and acceptance by Fire Construction Services. 12. Confidential Business Occupancy Information• The applicant shall complete the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District "Confidential Business Occupancy Information" form This form provides contact information for Fire District use in the event of an emergency at the subject building or property This form must be presented to the Fire Construction Services Inspector 13 Mapping Site Plan Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, a 8 '/z-inch by 11-inch or 11-inch by 17-inch site plan of the site in accordance with RCFPD Standard #13-1 shall be revised by the applicant to reflect the actual location of all devices and building features as required in the standard The site plan must be reviewed and accepted by the Fire Inspector 9 C, D, E,F,G 424 • RESOLUTION NO 07-39 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2006-00341, THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW FOR TENTATIVE TRACT NO. SUBTT18179, AND THE MASTER PLAN UNDER THE NEWLY ESTABLISHED MASTER PLAN OVERLAY DISTRICT LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND GROVE AVENUE IN THE MIXED USE DISTRICT, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN• 0207-011-35, 36, 41, 43, 44 AND 45. A. Recitals 1 Arbors at Route 66, LLC filed an application for the Development Review of Tentative Tract SUBTT18179, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development Review request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 27th day of June 2007, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held a meeting to consider the application 3 All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. • NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced meeting on June 27, 2007, including written and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows a. The application applies to approximately 10 1 acres of land, basically an irregular quadrangle configuration, located at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Grove Avenue and is presently agriculturally and residentially developed; and b. The property to the north of the subject site is a golf course, the property to the south consists of commercial shops, the property to the east is single-family residences, and the property to the west is commercial uses within the City of Upland; and property, and The Master Plan is subject to the approval of a Master Plan Overlay District for the d. The applicant has provided substantial technical evidence to support these conclusions 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced meeting and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby specifically finds and concludes as follows C, D, E,F,G 425 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 07-39 DRC2006-00341 -ARBORS AT ROUTE 66, LLC June 27, 2007 Page 2 • a That the proposed project is consistent with the obJectives of the General Plan; and b That the proposed development is in accord with the objectives of the Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located; and c. That the proposed development is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code, and d That the proposed development, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity 4. Based upon the facts and information contained m the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included forthe environmental assessmentfor the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows. a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative • Declaration was prepared Thereafter, City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration b. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it, finds: (i) that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA, and (ii) that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment The Planning Commission further finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission. Based on these findings, the Planning Commission hereby adopts the Mitigated Negative Declaration c The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081 6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation. The Planning Commission therefore adopts the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project d. The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring Program, and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the Planning Commission's decision is based is the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 477-2750. C,D,E,F,G 426 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 07-39 DRC2006-00341 -ARBORS AT ROUTE 66, LLC June 27, 2007 Page 3 5 Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subtect to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Plannina Department 1) This application is subtect to the approval of General Plan Amendment DRC2006-00223, Development District Amendment DRC2006-00350, and Development Code Amendment DRC2007-00029 by the City Council and approval of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18179 by the Planning Commission. 2) All conditions imposed on General Plan Amendment DRC2006-00223, Development District Amendment DRC2006-00350, Development Code Amendment DRC2007-00029, and Development Review DRC2006-00341 by the City Council and Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18179 by the Planning Commission shall be a condition of approval for this resolution 3) The applicant shall execute a covenant on the land in a form substantially similar to the Parking Declaration attached to the accompanying Staff Report in order to make the parking area of the office building available to the residents during off hours. • 4) The applicant shall execute a covenant on the land in a form substantially similar to the Use Restrictions attached to the accompanying Staff Report in order to only allow uses in the live/work units that are compatible with the Master Plan. 5) The signage for the office building shall incorporate a restrained use of off-lighting orhalo-lighting with minimal identification within the confines of the Foothill Boulevard Route 66 Visual Improvement Plan Sign review is a separate review process. 6) The lobby entry door and surrounding areas shall incorporate decorative security measures to be reviewed by the Planning Director for compatibility with the architectural design of the office building. 7) The applicant shall provide studies necessary to determine if a protected left-turn signal for southbound Grove Avenue onto Foothill Boulevard is warranted and shall install it subJect to CalTrans approval, if necessary Engineering Department 1) Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surface drainage entering the property from adtacent areas Consider the Q,oo runoff flow of 27 8 cfs entering the protect site from the north indicated in the January 2006 Parsons-Brinkerhoff Drainage Study prepared for the City 2) The easement on the property, in Rancho Cucamonga to the City of Upland, is to be quitclaimed by the developer. C, D, E,F,G 427 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 07-39 DRC2006-00341 -ARBORS AT ROUTE 66, LLC June 27, 2007 Page 4 3) Final Map shall show corner property line cutoff per City Standard Drawing No. 102, show point access easements for Lots 1 and 2, and wall-only easement for entry monument 4) tf the City decides to process the vacation of the existing Red Hill Country Club Drive along this development after City has realigned ~t, the developer or Homeowners Association (HOA) shall be responsible for the removal of any public improvements along its frontage to centerline of street and placement and maintenance of City approved landscaping or other approved facilities. The CC&Rs of the development shall provide for the improvements and maintenance 5) Provide a study necessary to determine if protected left-turn signals for north and southbound Grove Avenue onto Foothill Boulevard are warranted and install them subject to Caltrans approval, if necessary. 6) Foothill Boulevard improvements, including City entry monument and entry gateway at the Grove Avenue\Foothill Boulevard intersection, streetlights, patterned sidewalk with tree wells, etc shall conform to the Visual Improvement Program for Foothill Boulevard and the Foothill Boulevard Districts guidelines outlined in the Development Code. • 7) Foothi-I Boulevard frontage improvements are to be in accordance with City "Mayor Divided Arterial Streets" standards. Install curb and gutter, • asphalt pavement, sidewalk, streetlights, ADA access ramps, and street trees per City standards, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. a) Provide 27,000 and 16,000 lumen HPSV streetlights, in accordance with the Foothill Visual Improvement Plan b) Provide dual ADA access ramps at the Grove Avenue\Foothill Boulevard intersection per City Standard Drawing No 102. c) Protect existing street improvements d) Provide or protect R26(s) "No Stopping" signs along the frontage e) Protector replace traffic signal equipment. 8) Grove Avenue frontage improvements are to be in accordance with City "Secondary Arterial Streets" standards Install sidewalk, drive approach, streetlights, and street trees per City standards, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer a) An exception to the 50-foot maximum drive approach width (60 feet is being allowed for this project) is permitted although the drive approach shall comply with City Standard Drawing No. 101 in all other respects. b) Sidewalk shall be property-line-adiacent and shall comply with City Standard Drawing No 103, "With Non-Contiguous Sidewalk" example. For the drive approach on Grove Avenue, its intersection with the sidewalk shall comply with City Standard Drawing No 101, "Non-Contiguous Sidewalk" example C, D, E,F,G 428 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.07-39 DRC2006-00341 -ARBORS AT ROUTE 66, LLC June 27, 2007 Page 5 c) Referring to the drive approach, City Standard Drawing No. 101 shows a "non-contiguous" (property-line-adjacent) sidewalk crossing the driveway outside of the 90-degree curb return arc Provide a sidewalk easement necessary for this on the final map. d) The gated driveway is to be in accordance with the City "Gated Entrance Design Guide", except that a 60-foot maximum drive approach width is permitted e) Provide 9500 lumen HPSV streetlights f) Protect existing street improvements. g) Provide or protect R26(s) "No Stopping" signs. 9) Red Hill Country Club Drive frontage improvements are to be in accordance with City "Local Streets" standards. Install curb and gutter, A.C. pavement, sidewalk, ADA access ramp at Foothill Boulevard, limited access curb at emergency driveway, streetlights, and street trees per City standards, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. a) Gated driveway shall be "Emergency Access Only". b) No "turf block" is allowed in the public right-of-way. c) Provide 5800 lumen HPSV streetlights. d) Protect existing street improvements e) Provide or protect R26(s) "No Stopping" signs. 10) Coordinate the installation of Foothill Boulevard frontage improvements with the City project. 11) A contribution in-lieu of construction for the future median island m Foothill Boulevard shall be paid to the City prior to the issuance of building permits or final map approval, whichever occurs first. The amount of the contribution shall be one-half the cost of the median times the length of the project frontage 12) An in-lieu fee for one-half the cost of constructing special pavers within the Foothill Boulevard\G rove Avenue intersection shall be paid to the City prior to the issuance of building permits The fee amount shall be based on the square footage of the intersection 13) The existing overhead utilities (telecommunications and electrical, except for the 66 kV electrical) on the protect side of Grove Avenue shall be undergrounded from the first pole on the south side of Foothill Boulevard to the first pole off site north of the north project boundary, prior to public improvement acceptance or occupancy, whichever • occurs first All services crossing Grove Ave. shall be undergrounded at the same time Since the west side of Grove Avenue is in the City of Upland, reimbursement is not an option C,D,E,F,G 429 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 07-39 DRC2006-00341 -ARBORS AT ROUTE 66, LLC June 27, 2007 Page 6 14) The existing overhead utilities (telecommunications and electrical, except for the 66 kV electrical) on the project side of Red Hill Country Club Drive shall be undergrounded, prior to public improvement acceptance or occupancy, whichever occurs first All services crossing Red Hill Country Club Drive shall be undergrounded at the same time. The developer may request a reimbursement agreement to recover one-half the City adopted cost for undergrounding from future development (redevelopment) as it occurs on the opposite side of the street If the developer fails to submit for said reimbursement agreement within 6 months of the public improvements being accepted by the City, all rights of the developer to reimbursement shall terminate. 15) Manholes shall be provided wherever public storm drain systems end and private systems begin Provide appropriate easements wherever public storm drains cross private property and obtain an encroachment agreement to place private facilities within public rights-of-way. 16) Parkways shall slope at 2 percent from the top of the curb to one foot behind the sidewalk along all street frontages 17) Driveway accent paving shall be located outside the public right of way. • 18) Public improvement plans shall be 90 percent complete prior to the issuance of grading permits. Public improvement plans shall be 100 percent complete, signed by the City Engineer, and an improvement agreement and bonds executed by the developer, prior to building permit issuance 19) Complete the submitted Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) per the requirements of the City Engineer including, but not limited to, showing the Best Management Practices (BMPs) on grading plans, and signing and recording the Memorandum of Agreement Environmental Mitigation Air Quality 1) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers'specifications. Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification 2) Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, the developer shall submit construction plans to City denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low-emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the project Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning staff C, D, E,F,G 430 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 07-39 DRC2006-00341 -ARBORS AT ROUTE 66, LLC June 27, 2007 Page 7 3) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113 Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high volume, low-pressure spray. 4) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108. 5) All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 401, 402 and 403. Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions. • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering. • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads. • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time. • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods • Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices • Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. • Suspend grading operations during high winds (i e ,wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with Rule 403 requirements • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means 6) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWOCB]) dailyto reduce Fine Particulate Matter (PM,o) emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. 7) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions 8) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel-powered equipment where feasible. 9) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. C, D,E,F,G 431 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 07-39 DRC2006-00341 -ARBORS AT ROUTE 66, LLC June 27, 2007 Page 8 10) All industrial and commercial facilities shall post signs requiring that trucks shall not be left idling for prolonged periods (i e., in excess of 10 minutes). 11) All industrial and commeraal facilities shall designate preferential parking for vanpools 12) All industrial and commercial site tenants with 50 or more employees shall be required to post both bus and Metrolink schedules in conspicuous areas. 13) All industrial and commercial site tenants with 50 or more employees shall be required to configure their operating schedules around the Metrolink schedule to the extent reasonably feasible. 14) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate high-efficiency/low-polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters 15) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping. • 16) Use of Zero-VOC paints (assumes no more than 100 grams/liter of VOC) such as those listed by the SCAQMD of Super-Compliant Architectural Coating Manufacturers. Biological Resources 1) A Tree Removal Permit must be approved that provides for the replacement of the 12 on a 1.1 ratio basis with no fewer than two California Sycamores (Platanus Racemosa) placed in a prominent location in the project Cultural Resources 1) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will. • Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value • Consider establishing provisions to require incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point • Pursue educating the public about the area's archaeological heritage. C, D, E,F,G 432 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 07-39 DRC2006-00341 -ARBORS AT ROUTE 66, LLC June 27, 2007 Page 9 i • Propose mitigation measures and recommend conditions of approval to eliminate adverse project effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, following appropriate CEQA guidelines. Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the project area Submit one copy of the completed report with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. 2) If any paleontological resource (i.e. plant or animal fossils) are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified paleontologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i.e., paleontological monitoring) that maybe appropriate Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures• • Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to • the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing activities. • Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find. • Prepare, identify, and curate all recovered fossils for documentation in the summary report and transfer to an appropriate depository (i e ,San Bernardino County Museum) • Submit a summary report to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to San Bernardino County Museum Geology and Sods 1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PM,o emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 or re-planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM,o emissions assoaated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction C,D,E,F,G 433 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 07-39 DRC2006-00341 -ARBORS AT ROUTE 66, LLC June 27, 2007 Page 10 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM10 emissions from the site during such episodes. 4) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAOMD and RWOCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions Hydrology and Water Quality Construction Act~v~ties: 1) Prior to issuance of grading permits, the permit applicant shall submit to Building Official for approval, Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical • 2) An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included in the Grading Plan, and implemented for the proposed project that identifies specific measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading. This Erosion Control Plan shall include the following measures at a minimum• a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-site as a result of this project will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame. 3) During construction, temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff. 4) During construction, to remove pollutants, street cleaning will be performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site. Post- Construction Operational 5) The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in the Water Quality Management Plan (WOMP) prepared by Fuscoe Engineering on July 3, 2006, to reduce pollutants after construction entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical 6) Landscaping plans shall include provisions for controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth Plans for these areas, C, D, E,F,G 434 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 07-39 DRC2006-00341 -ARBORS AT ROUTE 66, LLC June 27, 2007 Page 11 including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permits 7) Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Engineer for approval of a WOMP, including a project description and identifying BMPs that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable. The WQMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004. 8) Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e , a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Building Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit. Norse • Exterior. 1) Construct a 5-foot high barrier for Lots (Units) 7 through 10 and Lots (Units) 72 through 92 facing Foothill Boulevard and Grove Avenue. 2) Construct a 5-foot high second floor balcony noise barrier for Lots (Units) 88 and 89 facing Foothill Boulevard. Interior. 3) Provide a "windows closed" condition requiring a means of mechanical ventilation for all homes. 4) Provide standard dual-glazed windows with a Sound Transmission Class (STC) rating of 26 or higher for all units and homes facing Grove Avenue and Foothill Boulevard 5) To minimize the potential interior noise impacts, lots (units) facing Foothill Boulevard should be provided with weather-stripped solid core exterior doors, and exterior wall/roof assemblies should be free of cut outs and openings. 6) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8.00 p.m. and 6'30 a m on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday C, D, E,F,G 435 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 07-39 DRC2006-00341 -ARBORS AT ROUTE 66, LLC June 27, 2007 Page 12 7) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17 02.120-D, as measured at the property line The developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17 02.120. Monitoring at other times may be required by the Building Official Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building Official within 24 hours; however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building Official. If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted 8) The perimeter block wall shall be constructed as early as possible in first phase. 9) Haui truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 8 00 p.m. and 6.30 a m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a Noise Mitigation Plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 27TH DAY OF JUNE 2007 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY~ Pam Stewart, Chairman ATTEST James R Troyer, AICP, Secretary I, James R Troyer, AICP, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 27th day of June 2007, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES COMMISSIONERS NOES. COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT COMMISSIONERS. • • • C, D,E,F,G 436 _:>~ ;~ ~ City of Rancho Cucamonga MITIGATION MONITORING -= ~~ PROGRAM --~=--~ Project File No.: DRC2006-00223, DRC2006-00341, DRC2006-00350, DRC2007-00029, SUBTT18179 This Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP) has been prepared for use in implementing the mitigation measures identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration fortheabnve-listed project This program has been prepared in compliance with State law to ensure that adopted mitigation measures are implemented (Section 21081 6 of the Public Resources Code). Program Components -This MMP contains the following elements: Conditions of approval that act as impact mitigation measures are recorded with the action and the procedure necessary to ensure compliance. The mitigation measure conditions of approval are contained in the adopted Resolution of Approval for the project 2. A procedure of compliance and verification has been outlined for each action necessary. This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported 3. The MMP has been designed to provide focused, yet flexible guidelines. As monitoring progresses, changes to compliance procedures may be necessary based upon recommendations by those responsible for the program. Program Management -The MMP will be in place through all phases of the project. The project planner, assigned by the Planning Director, shall coordinate enforcement of the MMP The project planner oversees the MMP and reviews the Reporting Forms to ensure they are filled out correctly and proper action is taken on each mitigation. Each City department shall ensure compliance of the conditions (mitigation) that relate to that department Procedures -The following steps will be followed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga A fee covering all costs and expenses, including any consultants' fees, incurred by the City in performing monitoring or reporting programs shall be charged to the applicant 2 A MMP Reporting Form will be prepared for each potentially significant impact and its corresponding mitigation measure identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Checklist, attached hereto. This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported. All monitoring and reporting documentation will be kept in the project file with the department having the original authority for processing the project Reports will be available from the City upon request at the following address: City of Rancho Cucamonga -Lead Agency Planning Department 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 C, D,E,F,G 437 MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM DRC2006-00223, DRC2006-00341, DRC2006-00350, DRC2007-00029, SUBTT18179 Page 2 3 Appropriate specialists will be retained if technical expertise beyond the City staff's is needed, as determined by the project planner or responsible City department, to monitor specific mitigation activities and provide appropriate written approvals to the project planner. 4 The project planner or responsible City department will approve, by signature and date, the completion of each action item that was identified on the MMP Reporting Form After each measure is verified for compliance, no further action is required for the specific phase of development. 5. All MMP Reporting Forms for an impact issue requiring no further monitoring will be signed off as completed by the project planner or responsible City department at the bottom of the MMP Reporting Form 6. Unanticipated circumstances may arise requiring the refinement or addition of mitigation measures The project planner is responsible for approving any such refinements or additions An MMP Reporting Form will be completed by the project planner or responsible City department and a copy provided to the appropriate design, construction, or operational personnel 7 The project planner or responsible City department has the authority to stop the work of construction contractors if compliance with any aspects of the MMP is not occurring after written notification has been issued. The project planner or responsible City department also has the authority to hold certificates of occupanaes if compliance with a mitigation measure • attached hereto is not occurring The project planner or responsible City department has the authority to hold issuance of a business license until all mitigation measures are implemented 8 Any conditions (mitigation) that require monitoring after project completion shall be the responsibility of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department The Department shall require the applicant to post any necessary funds (or other forms of guarantee) with the City. These funds shall be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measure for the required period of time In those instances requiring long-term project monitoring, the applicant shall provide the City with a plan for monitoring the mitigation activities at the project site and reporting the monitoring results to the City Said plan shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented The monitoring/reporting plan shall conform to the City's MMP and shall be approved by the Community Development Director or Planning Director prior to the issuance of building permits r ~_ C, D, E,F,G 438 L • ~~ a J Q H Z _~ J Y W 2 U _Z 0 Z 0 ~Q _V G U J J tD ~O d 3 O ~ O i O O N ~ ~ Q N C ~ ~ ~ V ~~ ~, Q ti m N rn N O O O ti O O N U D D l•J N V N = O ~ ,O^ W O O ~ N ~ d ~ (~ Q d O '- z a a~ a U _N ~ R a N N N N N N ,~~y a. ~.~ ~ ~ :~~ ~k • ~ ~~ a a a a a ~ . , U C C C C C C (~ f~ Rf (~ (SS (0 Q a n. ~ o.. a ~.-_ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~' m m ~' ~ m a i a i > > > > > > ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 6.a~' , . .~- U U U m U U ~f" • O m m m m U U U o~~c`~L + L a~-~oc~UO='= . map ~ ~ ~ ~' O ~_ ctS O Y- ~ ' ~- U U> .-. ~ O ~+ ~ U 7 O O O O r -p X ~ ~ N ~ O C a c0 ~~ L_ O~ (~ U U ,,' p ~ O ..... L O Q ~`. O Q...i. Q~ to C~ r- ~ p O L C N ~ Q i O ~ N Q- p ~ U N O ~ O Q O C U B C Q p >` O~~ y Cn ~ 7 ~ p~ a~ a~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ O ~ U L~ ~ z~. C U C ` ~ ~ O O m c~ co ~ O ~ ~ ~ cLS O O- O C ~ ~ L O Q co ~ O ?~ U O U kt; ~ CO N > Q- i f[S E ~ ttj fl_ "O O Q CLS ~ U C ~ C Q - O Q. >, N N= O` L Q~ O O Q C m~ a C~ ~- O O '-' 0 O - (l) ~ O O (d C ++ - - O O ~ U L Rt N 7 7 ~ O p ~ ~ O ~ > Q L C c0 Q - U - O C Q1 O C C~ L C (~ _ U L~ O p p ~ , c ~ ~ ~ / C _i U C O U) ~.J ,f (~ to N C O ~ ` l ~ (n ~' ~ p Q p O O 00 ~ ~ C L "O O i 0 p .r ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ > C ( , ; ^ O O ~ O ~ ~ O ~ ~ ~ p ~ ~ ~ O C Q j p • C O O C ~ v' p ~~- ~ ~ O L O O H O ~ a N ~ N ~ U U~ O O p 0~ ~ L U p "~ N~ O~ Q~ Q. ~ c6 ~ Q- O N d Q ~ O C Q- C ~ 7 (~ j ~ ~ O ~ ~ ~ - ~ ~ U U RS U "O ~ Q ~ O ~ ~ "O _~ O` ~ ~ O -~ L C ~ O C C I- 6 U _ ~ U p" -p (~ ~ Q N- O =_ C L Q ~ "O CSS ~ ~ C c~ O ~ ~ ~ (~ d O ca ~i C N O "O L O N ~ O O ~ ~ ~ c ~ c .~ L O U L ~~ o~~ ~ -o ~~ ~ i~ ~ O ~ ~ ai ~ Q O ~ ~ ~~ "' ~ ~ >, ~ y O O C O ~ ~. i C C O O~ O U N C "O ~ `~ ,-. ~ S T N c0 ~ `~ .d ~ °- i cc m i o ~ di c ci ° o ~E c E °'~ ~ ~~ o ~o a~ ~ co C ~ a o as E o_o~ > a~ ~'a ~ ~ m o ~~ ~ o ~~ `' n n U O C C - d ~ ~ ~ > O> C O~ 7 0 C (~ C C ~ > O O c~ c~ O N O' ' .C C .C - O ~ m (SS O - p (,) 0 0 - ~ U Q O O Qoa~~E~~ > - ~-o~a>a~a>SUE~d Qad_c Qc Q~CS . C, D, E,F,G 439 rn 0 T . . v ~ v ~* N N N ~ ~ ~ d' ~ d' ~t N ' a a a Q Q Q Q Q Q a s Q a Q 0 0 = ~ o 0 Q a O O O O U D)i U Q)i _ U m.-. U m~ U CAi O O O N N N C y C~ C~ C ~- C N N O > O > O > N > O i C 0 0 C C O O i C 7 0 C C 0 0 C C 0 0 D > O ~ > O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 4 U ~ U ~ U ~ U U U U U U U U U U U U U . . O O O O O O O O O O O m m m m m m m m m m m O ~ OHO C"6 C ~ U ~O O ~_ O N O N~ >~C_ C 'D C O C O "J C ~ ~Y O t~ "O ~ C O O ~ C i .C (0 In O v~ O L U O .C (~ C~ ~ N O (d O U~ O N ~ to ~ 0 O- C O 3 0 co O ~ N W N O- c~ >, ~ L .~ C O 'O O U C C ~ O O C 0 '~ O i CD ~ ~ ~ O ~ E: t U L- ~ O i~ O i ma O _ ~ •«- 0 L to ~ O N O »- O C fLf O U O~ U O o (~ C ~ N i (LS O ~ . y ~ C O ~ O O ~ ~ "O O H ~ ~~ ~ (~ O ~~ N U O O U O O O s _ O' O _ ~ ~ c0 _ ~ ~ U N ~ ~ c0 ~ _ O Cn ~ o C/) ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ C N U ~ Q. ~ O a> ~ (~ U N O ~ ~ C U ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ ~ >, "~ ~ a C7 ~ ~ U ~ (d . N ~ ~ O O ~ In C to c C ~ ~ Cd N ~ > C i ~ > c~ ~ i O ~ ~ p ~ ~ O O O p ~ ~ _ .--~ ~ C to c~ ~ O O ~ ~ C c a U ~ C - c~ O u~ O ~ "p O" O~~ ~ -p ~ ~ ~ 'p m O N- }, N > - O c0 L - O ~~ N ~ L "a >, C C O x N 'O c O~ a7 C N O U O > O~ p p O ~ Q _O 7~ CO C j~ ~_O p d7~ N~ ~N 7 ~ ~+ ~ ~ C~CC _ Q~ N 7 U C C O N p ~ ~ ~ U C i 7 C U Q (~ ~~ ~ ~ O N ~ O Q O Q ~ cd U ~ ~ ~~ N ~ ~ O ~ N ~ > ~ Q ~ Q O O O U~ Q ,~ O `= ~ U ~ C U -p ~~ O _~ Q U 7 O O O ._~ 7 ~ -p ~ Q O> U N Q C Q U O C U U~ O ~ ~ »_ N> O N ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ O (0 Y (~ ~~ L O ~ ~ O C Q O N ~ O ~ ~ L. ~ ~ ~ O O O O ~ N ~ a~ c~ p _ _ _ ~ U -C ~ U ~ ~ N ~ c0 ~ C U N L ~ ~ C_ ~ to c LL a> N ~ O to cn ~ ~ ~ »- ` ~ O C ~ O ~ O O N U U ~ O Q O p Y O 'D O O O C Q O ~ Ql i O~ O~ in ~ ~" Q -O ~ ~ ~ C ~ U ~~ c6 U C _ _ ~ ~ c~ m r~ ~ O ~? ~ O U U ~ L~ U ~- p Q U ~ P T O E: ~ ~ 7 C U O C~ 7 ~ fn RS C 7~ N V U Q O~ i ~ ~ c~ (n O ~ ~ t~ O fn ~ I- U Cn ~ Cn L O O ~ ~ ~ O C~ C ~ > O ~- O C ~ ^ ~ ~ O U F- [n ~ ~ cd ~ > ~ ~ U ~ Rf ~ L _~ I- ctS ~ O ~ ~ U U • O N • C, D,E,F,G 440 • • • ~`~ ~~: ~ , c\ c~ c~ v v ~ v ~ N N N N N N N ~ ;j,? „~,. ~.~r ; :,~, Q U a ^ ^ U U U s: U a ~ n c c c c c c ~ ':,~~ ~ c~ c~ c~ c~ c~ ct3 a a a Q a a a. ~ .; a. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 `''°'' o ~ ~ a a m ~ ~ ' ,:~` ~ a i i a i i a i a i ` i a > m > m > m > m > a~ > m > a~ ~'~ f > °' aC ~ ac oC ~ oC oC -,:3, ~ ~ ,. ' ~; ^ ' ' ~ _ U U U U U U U ,y- m • • ' ~C m U U U m m m U <n-a C N a> ~~ O C ~ ~ o O N "" m a> .D C~ a~~ L C o a~ m O L C ~ cn ~ ~ N y 7 U a>= c ~ a~ C O O L N ~ ~ t.C) N t.C) O 7 0 C ~, L O~ > 3 0 7 0 0- L L N (0 C~ Cn p L U O O a N ~ , U O N O p~ O~ Q a O ~ ~ s "_' p ~ ~~ ~ O" i ~ o y O -~ ~ ~ ' ~ ~ ~.~ ., a c ~ ~ c - ~ - O C~ U p c~ ~ _C o ~ ~~~ O U ~ ~ r U C ~ o O O U O O C "a L O1 N C~ ~ C~ C 7 V~ C >' _ ~- U ~ r O C N O N O fn y E ' ~ ~ ~ " ~ ~ O N C i RS N ~ - C O O "" ~ U C ~ i O U N i~ O O O '-' C ~ ~ ~ > O C U - ~ '= O u7 c~ C ~ O y ~ O ~ U O U ~ O V ., ~~ O y~ 7 c ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ° ~ ~ ~ ~ °~ ~ ~ ~ E ~ ~ ~ ~ ca c o ~ ° E F _ a~ L ~ _ _ _ p U a _ O "~ ~ ` ~ ~ ~ ~ ~,~ ~ N O O ~ ~ a~ -Q w--~ i C _ L _ O ~ ~ .-. ~ _ ~ 00 O ~ Q c0 U ~Q" _ c0 O i `-"O~ _ OL Q N N UL ~r O ~ ~ ~m~~ N ~ C .«-. O C~ O O O N Q p O ~~ (0 ~ "r ~ 7~ ~ ~ Q LO '. r U~ O Q T~ L U ~ ~ ~ C ~ ~ c6 ~ OU ~ ~ U c0 C ~ U ,. ' . -. O co ~ ~ Q _j E:~~ _O E o L c~--` cn~, E_o~c L oLa~_ U x - C .O ~ C 'L3 O .~. ~ L ~ U p u'., d p C p O O N O O O ~ i 0 ...c O C~ ~ C C~ 'D ca o y C O '0 0 caa>a~cn C~ C~ c O U C ca > O (n ~ ,,,_O ('~ E ..C U >a~....~ i .. ~ _ y N O Y ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ Q me ~, L >, L c~ U ~ ~ o U ~ a >~- ~ o ~ o uY ~;~m o U ~ a o o., ~ ~~ ~ L m~ a~-o ~ ro ~aoU ~o a o ~ ~ o ,~,~ ~ ~o~ p C C C ~~ ~ ~ ~ h,(~" O ~ 7 C (n 'D i~ 0 "O i O ~ ~ p ~ ~ X y ~ O C fn O O L ~ ~ O U Q 7 -~' ' O O C O CSS ~ C ' O~ T C C C C C O CS5 C p 0 ~ C O C N D C N N O Q 7~ ~ O E Q C O O .C L •--` L U ~ , ~ (0 0 > y L ~ -_ ~ Q ~ Q -_ ~ Q Q -_ O N Q E: ~ -_ O Q N Q E: O ~ ~ -_ Q ~ L -_ O Q ~ ~ ~ ~ U td ~ LA CfJ ~ , _ " m ~ »= (ff Q ~ ~ ~ C U C U ~ ` '- O ~ C~ Q C~ rn O c~ C, D, E,F,G 441 • • • d- v co co ,r; ~' : ~ ~t ~ v =°, ~~~, „4~ R .~ 4 ~ a a o 0 * ~ .~ Q Q Q O o_ O a O a O a. °~ ~:~~. ~ ~ ~ m ~' c c c 0 0 0 • 0 0 0 0 U U U N ~ O` ~ m i m~ O N - .. C ~ C ~ C N O O O O O O O O O O ~'d _. • ", U m m ~ ~ U U U • m , ;l ,,., m m m ~ U U U ~ C ~ O ~~ N ~ i C L~ ~ ~ L C U~ 0 0 C ~ ,~- cC ~ c~ C p c~ ~ N ~ ~ U U CO ~ ~ ~ ~ C ~ ~ fA U ~ O ~ ~ O 0 ~ C to O O C O O> ~ C~ 'O O~ ,~ ~~ CD ~O ~ O C ~ O~ U d ~ ~ "O U O O~ ~~ N ~ O ~,~±.-~ ... U U O U.-. Q1 U c~~ ~ ~ -O ~ C ~~~ LQ ~ U OY.-. o O O i a~m _ C~ "O ~ .~ ~~a m0 O (0 C >.~c~ U L- ~joc~ O U ~ N ~sc~~;~~ U i U C ~ ciao Q -O a~ ' ~ ; O ~~ ~ ~ i E O cLS 0 0~ ~ O O O H U Q Q" i O U N >i C~ >. O C O "-' O~ O p N O O O E: O _O C in U N ~ ~ c0 _ ~ N N ~ 'O m o N ~_ -O O C~ O ' ~' ~ ,~_ ~ ~ U Q N U ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ ~ c~ ~' .= ~ O U C ~ -O Q ~ ~ U~~ ~ m ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ CC L ~ i C ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Q ~ U (~ N 'C ~ ~ C~ >i O ~ O L L C C O` E O O O O O O- ~ ~ ° `O ~ Q ~ O -_ .C ~ Ctl .--. ~ ~ cn Q O O- ~ O N C O -O (~ C O C ~ 7 U U O " i ` O N~~~ O O N >' >i >+ ~ - N _ O~ 0 0 _ O U~ O `O O 6 ~~ ~' C O U P ~ '~ U c~ L Q U • ~ 0 ~ j ~ ~ ~ Q ~ (SS fSS to O ~ y ~ c O ~ ~ ~. ~ „N , _ .O ~ ~ ~ Q ~ ~ U E ~ N ~ O" O O C U t~ "O O~ O C 0 0 0 y 0 N~~ U -O ~ Q C y CS3 ~ ~ .. _ O fly C~ O U >, ~ N S _ U _p ~~ O O C C ~ 7 ~ O "O ~ O O CO .--. 0 O~~ ~~ i ~ O Q~ ~ O O~ C, ~ y N -O Q Q N O E~ a U ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' = a j c0 C ~ ~ > ~ t6 ~ C0 ¢ ~ O O C ~ ~ O ~ (n ~ - j O O O O L i fn U Cd ~ ~ ~ C O , "~ ~ O O >, O . to ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ y ~ C ~ ~ ~ • ~ Q O ~ 'O (n O O '- ~ U d ~ co U Cn U U ~ ~ O ! > ~ y OU ~ ^ ^ ^ ^ `~~ Y to ~ ~ >~ ?i ~ O ~ LL ~ O O O O C~ Q O C, D, E,F,G 443 ~,,~ ~ ~ v ~ ~ N N N N ~ s ,- t~, ~~, ~~- , a a a a C C C C ' o ~ ~ a Q U O O O O p) ~ _ >i C y _ N N O O C ~ N N O N ~ U -_ ~ ~ ~ ~ ;~ ~ ~ ~ 0 U U U U U m m m m m m m m m U ~ U ~ ~ 7 ~ O O C O O ... ~ ~ C - U - O) N O O > ~ N N VJ i ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ W ~ ~ p ~_ ~ ~ U ~ O ~ ~ O (~ y ~ Q ,C 7 ~ O n~~_ C O n . fn U U O_ - O_ - C ..C ~ N ~ ~ O ~ ~ ~ m ~ cCf L ~ ~ O C "_ N O ~ ~ O O ~ "O ~ (LS O in O ~ O `~ > Q 0~.. Q. ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ U C~ ~ ~ ~ ~ U ~ ~ O L L O ~ O ~ X 7 7 ~ ~ •« O ~ U N~ > N O~ d U d ~ O~ ~ o U O~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Q~ N O 0 ~ ~ + O ~ C Q ~ O N ~ "O C ~ ~ O> U O O O _ C .. ~~ O ~ (SS O~ O C O . N . ~~ O C~ _ O U- N "J -~ .~ N L ~ O O C E ~_ ~ _ N c "= ~ O ~ ~ ~ U L O ~ N ~ c~ O p ~ C ~ ~ O . ~ ~ -O N ~ ~ O C O N +.. ~ cJ Q C ~ ~ O ~ N ~ Q. O ~ U E O ~ C ~ cn ~ ~ U ~ N "° O O O ~ ~ ~ Q ~ ~ Q ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N a ~ ~ O N N C ~ ~ ~ E ~ ~ O N ~ O O O i ~ . !V O C O ~ ~ ~ > ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N c0 ~ (~ ~ O -C y L ~ C `p C C N (~ R C N cts ~ O m~~ O H O O X ~ C C U O~ O C O~~ ~ ,~ .~ O p_ .... W N . U (d i i ` ~ O Q- C~ p U ~= E~ O ~ U O C in 'D U O p .- ~ ~ D7 N ~ ~ O W "~ p>~~~ O C C O O .«- ~ ~ p ~_ 7 p »- ~ ~~ O cd c°n ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~m ~ o ~ O O i U ~ ~~~ c"a~ ~ ~ o ~ o ~~ a C O ° ° ° o U ~ o ~ ~ NCO ~~ ~ 7d C N U X CA C_ Q-O C O N~ C ~D)- O70 (~ O Q ~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ i c~ _ O ~ N ~ ~ C 'D ~ N N O O U C C L U ~ ~ O ~ ~ C~~ C ~ C ~ C C C > L > ~ ~ UDC ~ >, 2 ~ ~ ~ N ~ O N d ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ C N O C N ~ ~ ~ C C " ~ O~ Q C O P Q~ 7 ~ ~ ~ n "O ~ ~ 7 O ~ ~ D U c~ Q cLS ~ U N Q O O ~ U ~ • O • CO • C, D, E,F,G 444 • • • v ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ N N N N N a a a a ~_ ~ U • 0 0 0 0 = ,' ,~ o ~ ~ ~ >' m a i a i i a a i a>> ai ai ai a>> ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ m m m m m . . m m m ' U U ~ ~ ~ c o o ~ ° o ~ o ~' ~on.L E~ c`a ~ o ~ a~ c`o ~ ~ `~_ c`a m~ ~ ~-~a~ w ~ ~ o~ ~ N~ ~ °~ cZ~ U ~ ~ c ~°~ mU c o o 0 a~ E C o ~ ~ ~,~ ~U o, O ~~~ m o ~ o a~ L LL ~ o oC7 m c~ot~C~ E OW ~ti N .-. ~ O N O ~ O C L p w U (0 m (p ~ L U ~ (0 U p (n f~ m ~~- u) > -p~L y p O a0 ~O U CO ~~ _ C C a- C~~~Q~W ~ W ~ C +-' U Q. C~ O ~ O. O Q in O p 'O C C ~ (0 ~.' co ~ .. ~ d o~ Z ~ C ~ N O U m .-.. ~~ Q) d~ > .L-.~ O C C d C -O Q ~ > C Z 4' E~ U~ O N N O C M C U 'p ~ L O) ~ to O~ ~ O_ 'O ~ C ' Q~ N Z O O j L~ c ~ w (0 C (D ?' ~ a O C O ~0 C L ~~ N U O J p c0 ~ _ Q ~~ (0 U ~ (d '~ O X C O C L ~ C u i ~ 'p ~ O J L ~ O) _ d C 7 0 R O C C ~ 'L7 ~0 0 "~' O p Q N a O U L N NO ,~ ~ p O~ p~ "O ~~ C O 00 C O C O C C~ N tp -O C C .Q O - E O O (d O -_ a" C O E 7 +~ E ~ p U 0~ a 0 O) L O) O 'p to N> 7 C U C >, d W ,~ - p ~ ~ p O~ 7 • ~~ O O X O (0 C~ C N E (U ~ ~ O~ O ~, O~ N a -p ~O = (n ~ O L ~ ~ C Q O p~ U (6 O N ~ C N p~ N ~~ ~ (0 L 3 0 C O Z O C N (0 >' .-. O L~ Q • ~ (~ ~ N ~ C U L ~ > "O ~ ~ ~ _ L ~ j p ~ ~ ,~ ~ O N " O C ~ O ~ f~ ~ O ~ ~. (0 L O ~ > (0 H O L C V ~ C (n O 7 > (D ~ ~ -O U U j, 0 w O ~ N ,~ O ~ V ~ ~ C tp ~ C~ O ~ >O C ~ O (6 ~ `p E L ~ ~ O ~ cn_Q) c ~ n, c~c a cfl U c0 ~p O m o , a~yco ~ U c O ~ c to ~ UoU~o... c a~ p Z O d ~ ( ovC~ " ' . ` ~ ~ p O W ,~ a1 a N 'o O ~ (0 ~ ~ ~p N C O -~~ O n - m - O co c w c U N C U C D ~ in ~ C O (~ p 0~ O~ O N O C a~ ~~ p -O fl- m N O 'D ~ C ~~ ~~~~ N 7 N y O~ E U N O ~ y C O N ~ O~ O - ~~ V O (0 ~ U (B J a U ~. N N O C -O >~~ U- N C N O 0 0~ N O N O~ ~ O O ~. C_ O y u j p 0 ~ O U O~ ~~ ~~ U O) ~ '~ .~ C V O C v T~L. -O ~ O N o~u. ~~? N E c c= E w~ c m~ ~ O N ~~ c~ c('1 c~ > c ° L y O to ~. o p_L N c N~ ~~-° c ~ ' N C c °~ >,o >, ~.L...a QN co o~ m c o > o J U ~L N..Lr E ~ O_ c ~-_ ~ a~ m co ~ to C ~"O~ E~~ c Q o m,n o 5 0 4- (D ~~U~ O-°mU 0 Z 00 0. Uc-m rn 4- O ti C, D, E,F,G 445 . . N N N N ~ ti' Q • U U U U Q Q Q ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ °- ~ °- m °- c o °- 0 0 0 • O O O O U U U O ~ ~ D1 L O N N O b C ~ + + C N C ~ O N N N j C O C ? C ~ ~ ~' ~ D U ~~ D U • • m m m m U U U . • . . m m m m m m U m - cn ~ - = v~ L ~ -a a~ cu a~ c a~ >, -- >, ~- ~ a~ >, m ~ m >, C O O O O O ~ O N C~ O "O U~ O~~- C L C L 7 0 C O >+ ~ "-' ~ ~ ~ Vj ~ X N 7 U - Y O p (B Q O (0 (0 "O >' ~ N U (n O ~ O p C ~ C O O) f0 O) (O L -O O (0 j "O O Q C ~ p "O N~ C O ~ X C E O~ O L~ .L--~ N O > U (U N O "O (~ U L O) C ~ p Q U p C (n ` ~ .-. (6 L .O 0 0~~ D L ~ O O ~ 7 L~ ~ ~ U 0 0 _ N L O O (p O C ~ (9 C U Q Q C O (n O~~ U N O o0p O~ p N O O~ -OO O 7 O" ~ O L C~ O~ c0 ~ X ~~ to 3 U O Q+~ C O _ C ~> C O O O)- N N N _C C ~ -p S ~ ~ N C ~ N ~ O O "~ > _O ~ ~ U O ~ m O U > ~ ~ U ~ O ~ O (0 "O O N E ~~ X L C N C M C O p a ~ N~ p Q c O O>~ ( ~ N ~ - 00 N~ U L O N p .-. O j ~ - C - p Lp O ~~ C ~ N C O O~ o p ~ p~~ C 0 0 7 0 ~ OU L O ~ c0 • ~ ~ U ~ o ~ 7 p ~ c n ~ ~ ~~ ~, ~ ~ co ° ~ m~ o~ O ~La s c ° ~~ N ~m~ -- tq m o ~ ~ O N~ ~ m U cn ~ Y i O N N L O ~ ~ ~ > a (0 ~ N O-pL ~ O)Q~ > _ C~... ` `+~y= U OU O (0 (~ C O ~ L • Ln O J ~ C (Q fd U ~ C C O .L.. LL. N , ~ O ~ O O ~ w C ~ O (0 ~ r >, ~ N ~~ O L O` O Q L~ C L ` . -. p C N L ' ?~ U p O L O~ Q to N C C U (9 t CO pp (n p ~ O N O N O -O ,~ ?~ O) •~ ~ O C N O ' ~> ~ p • D V O C c0 ~> ~~ O L ~ N~ 'O ~ O C c0 ~cu> o ~ U .~ ~ ~O ~ c m w L 7 O~ ~ O N U " U y N O 7 "d ~ a N p 7 Q L "~ "~ "0 ~ "~ ca ~6o co~cu w ~ .n .= to N ~ N ~ ~ ~ O ~ C ~ ~ c ~ ~ +L-' O C to i ~ ~ o b N 'D N O N O N ` ` ~ m 'O ~ 'O cn d O C S C O p 0 O~ ~. ,~ O (0 "' O ~. N C O C (6 O O O N Q C O y-, O p U p C C O > fn -p H O C C C C O f U I~ O O O N L O~ O f~ t0 O Q L to U .Q m Q. O Q. F-- C m ~- ~~ >i O U L ~ C ~ U U r 'O C U L to L (q L.. N~ N I- (~ • O • C, D, E,F,G 446 • • • • • • • f~ ~' • • • Q C O ~ U ~ ~~ C ~ C Q O U • • O • m O O y f6 0 0 fd C O N L . --~ ~ ~- ~ L .C N L (Q O a ... to n tOn ~ ~ ~ ~ N ~ O O O -O 7~ O C "- C O~ c Y~ O O c 0 ~ C H 7 ~ O O ` U~ X ~ "-' ~ ~ U ( C U C p N _ O >~~ c~ "'~ N Q E ~ ~0 ~ ~ iac Nco~a ~,L-' (0 O C O (D C A N O O O -p . co te - ~ c ~ ~ c - a _ ~ N (6 ~ ~ O ~ ~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ p O N N Q~ Q U N y U~~ > ~ T N C O ""-' "O fA ~ U .. ~O ~ 'D N"C7 ~ ~ (n o p ~ (B p ~ U" O) L 3 U c N a ~ .° o c '~ ~ v > ~ a ~ c - c-a c c a~ m = L C C t f0 Q. ~ ~ ~ C O .; d Q Q Y V d t U 0 ~, d Y ~- m E ~ >, U ~ 4. m c_ ~ LL V U ~ ~ O C 7 m O C ~ O N m (6 ~ U_ ~ y O a"i ~ m a~i O o a ~ ~ (~ - U y ~ U ~°' ~_ O o O ~ O o ? ~ Y O O t L t > `C:. ~ ~ ~ in ~ ~ U ~ ;~ f1~' N c'~ d' ~ cD ti N C f6 ~. N _N (9 ~ O d N ~ O ~ O n Q N i+ ~ ~ . ~~, CO € ~ ,~ ~ ~ U E 7 ~~ y ~ U ~ a,.., Q:A C m ~ Q O U N m Y3 G '" rn ~ m w c ~ ca n !~' O O a cn Q m U ~ c m =, ?~: o. c .~ v p O . ~ '~ N ~ C ~ U 2 ~ ? d ..: ~ o ~ O U C o .u.,, ~' Z ~ o U ~ o a~ n rn ~ ,~ ' $Lr ~ W o I-' L m E O ~ ~ n ~~ ~ ~ F- c O O ~~ Q m U ~ w O a> C O) fA O x O O U ~ o ~ m E a°~i °~ c o c °-~ a~ °~ m n o c m a~ ~ y o ~ ` Q O O f4 N ~ Q. d .~ ~ c N c U ~ O f0 ~ o ,.a` E _~ m m U r c; -Q' o U a w ~ -o ~ ~ o U ~ o U U m a ~ ',~ ~;~ p U a U w U 0 m 0 d 0 W C, D, E,F,G 447 ~«- O ~ ~~ ''~. ~~ ~~ ~~'' ; - F ,~; COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SUBJECT: MASTERPLAN FORA 10.1 ACRE PROJECT SITE APPLICANT: ARBORS AT ROUTE 66, LLC LOCATION: NORTHEAST CORNER OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND GROVE AVENUE ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TD YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: General Requirements The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the Clty, Its agents, officers, or employees, because of the Issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees maybe required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The Clty may, at its sole discretion, participate at Its own expense in the defense of any such actlon but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition 2 Approval of Tentative Tract No SUBTT18179 is granted subject to the approval of Development District Amendment DRC2006-00350 and Development Review DRC2006-00341 3 Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No 07-39, Standard Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be Included on the plans (full size) The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect The applicant shall be required to pay any applicable Flsh and Game fees as shown below The project planner will confirm which fees apply to this project All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commisslon Secretary prior to the Planning Commisslon or Planning Director hearing a) Notice of Determination - $50 b) Negative Declaration - $ 1,850 Completion Date -/-/. -/-/- -/-/. i \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2007 Res & Stf Rpt\DRC2006-00341StdConds 6-27 doc C, D, E,F,G 448 Protect No DRC2006-00341 Completion Date B. Time Limits 1 This tentative tract map or tentatlve parcel map shall expire, unless extended by the Planning _/_/_. Commission, unless a complete final map is flied with the City Engineer within 3 years from the date of the approval 2 Conditional Use Permit, Variance, or Development/Design Review approval shall explre if _/_/_ building permits are not Issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval No extensions are allowed C. Site Development 1 The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which Include _/_/_ site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, Development Code regulations, and the Foothill Boulevard Route 66 Visual Improvement Plan. 2 Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions _/_/_ of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director 3 Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Building Code and _/_/_ State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Department to show compliance The buildings shall be Inspected for compliance prior to occupancy 4 Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating ail Conditions of Approval shall be _/_/_ submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits 5 All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street Improvement plans shall be coordinated for _/_/_ consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, • building, etc.) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first 6 Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all _/_/_ other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the time of building permit issuance. 7 A detailed on-site lighting plan, including a photometric diagram, shall be reviewed and approved _/_/_ by the Planning Director and Police Department (477-2800) prior to the Issuance of building permits. Such plan shall indicate style, illumination, location, height, and method of shielding so as not to adversely affect adjacent properties 8 If no centralized trash receptacles are provided, all trash pick-up shall be for individual units with _/_/_ all receptacles shielded from public view 9 Trash receptacle(s) are required and shall meet City standards The final design, locations, and _/_/_ the number of trash receptacles shall be subject to Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits 10 All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc ,shall be _/_/_ located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the Planning Director For single-family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults 11 All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, _/_/_ including proper illumination I \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2007 Res & Stf Rpt\DRC2006-00341StdConds 6-27 doc C, D, E,F,G 449 Project No DRC2006-00341 Completion Date • • • 12 The Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) and Articles of Incorporation of the _/_/_ Homeowners' Association are subject to the approval of the Planning and Engineering Departments and the City Attorney. They shall be recorded concurrently with the Final Map or prior to the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. A recorded copy shall be provided to the Clty Engineer The Homeowners' Association shall submit to the Planning Department a list of the name and address of their officers on or before January 1 of each and every year and whenever said information changes 13 All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property _/_/_ owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for Planning Director and City Engineer review and approved prior to the issuance of building permits 14 The developer shall submit a construction access plan and schedule for the development of all _/_/_ lots for Planning Director and City Engineer approval, including, but not limited to, public notice requirements, special street posting, phone listing for community concerns, hours of construction activity, dust control measures, and security fencing 15. Six-foot decorative block walls shall be constructed along the project perimeter If a double wall _/_/_ condition would result, the developer shall make a good faith effort to work with the adjoining property owners to provide a single wall Developer shall notify, by mail, all contiguous propen:y owner at least 30 days prior to the removal of any existing walls/ fences along the project's perimeter. 16. Construct block walls between homes (i a ,along interior side and rear property lines), rather than _/_/_ wood fencing for permanence, durability, and design consistency 17. Access gates to the rear yards shall be constructed from a material more durable than wood _/_/_ gates Acceptable materials include, but are not limited to, wrought iron and PVC 18. For residential development, return walls and corner side walls shall be decorative masonry. _/_/_ Parking and Vehicular Access (indicate details on building plans) 1 All parking lot landscape islands shall have a minimum outside dimension of 6 feet and shall _/_/_ contain a 12-inch walk adjacent to the parking stall (including curb) 2 Textured pedestrian pathways and textured pavement across circulation aisles shall be provided _/ / throughout the development to connect dwellings/units/buildings with open spaces/plazas/ _ _ recreational uses 3 All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles, entrances, _/_/_ and exits shall be striped per City standards 4 All units shall be provided with garage door openers if driveways are less than 18 feet in depth _/_/_ from back of sidewalk 5 Motorcycle parking area shall be provided for commercial and office facilities with 25 or more _/_/_ parking stalls Developments with over 100 parking stalls shall provide motorcycle parking at the rate of one percent The area for motorcycle parking shall be a minimum of 56 square feet 3 I \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2007 Res & Stf Rpt\DRC2006-00341 StdConds 6-27 doc C, D,E,F,G 450 Project No DRC2006-00341 Completion Date E. Trip Reduction 1 Bicycle storage spaces shall be provided in all commercial, office, Industrial, and multifamily _/_/_. residential projects of more than 10 units Minimum spaces equal to five percent of the required automobile parking spaces or three bicycle storage spaces, whichever Is greater After the first 50 bicycle storage spaces are provided, additional storage spaces required are 2 5 percent of the required automobile parking spaces Warehouse distribution uses shall provide bicycle storage spaces at a rate of 2 5 percent of the required automobile parking spaces with a minimum of a 3-bike rack In no case shall the total number of bicycle parking spaces required exceed 100 Where this results In a fraction of 0 5 or greater, the number shall be rounded off to the higher whole number 2 Category 5 telephone cable or fiber optic cable shall be provided for office buildings and other _/_/_ non-residential development F. La ndscaping 1 A detailed landscape and Irrigation plan, Including slope planting and model home landscaping In _/_/_ the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the Issuance of building permits or prior final map approval In the case of a custom lot subdivision 2 A minimum of 20% of trees planted within industrial projects, and a minimum of 30% within _/_/_ commercial and office projects, shall be specimen size trees - 24-Inch box or larger 3 Within parking lots, trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15-gallon tree for every three parking _/_/_ stalls 4 Trees shall be planted in areas of public view adjacent to and along structures at a rate of one _/_/_ tree per 30 linear feet of building. • 5 All private slopes of 5 feet or more in vertical height and of 5 1 or greater slope, but less than 2 1 _/_/_ slope, shall be, at minimum, Irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for erosion control Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent Irrigation system to be Installed by the developer prior to occupancy 6 All private slopes In excess of 5 feet, but less than 8 feet in vertical height and of 2 1 or greater _/_/_ slope shall be landscaped and Irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as follows one 15-gallon or larger size tree per each 150 sq ft of slope area, 1-gallon or larger size shrub per each 100 sq ft of slope area, and appropriate ground cover In addition, slope banks In excess of 8 feet in vertical height and 2 1 or greater slope shall also include one 5-gallon or larger size tree per each 250 sq ft of slope area Trees and shrubs shall be planted In staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane Slope planting required by this section shall Include a permanent Irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy 7 For multi-family residential and non-residential development, property owners are responsible for _/_/_ the continual maintenance of all landscaped areas on-site, as well as contiguous planted areas within the public right-of-way All landscaped areas shall be kept free from weeds and debris and maintained in healthy and thriving condition, and shall receive regular pruning, fertilizing, mowing, and trimming Any damaged, dead, diseased, or decaying plant material shall be replaced within 30 days from the date of damage 8 The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be Included In _/_/_ the required landscape plans and shall be subject to Planning Director review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the Engineering Department 4 I \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2007 Res & Stf Rpt\DRC2006-00341StdConds 6-27 doc C, D, E,F,G 451 Protect No DRC2006-00341 9 Special landscape features such as mounding, alluvial rock, specimen size trees, meandering sidewalks (with horizontal change), and intensified landscaping, is required along Foothill • Boulevard and Grove Avenue in accordance with the Foothill Boulevard Route 66 Visual Plan Improvement Plan 10 Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on the perimeter of this protect area shall be continuously maintained by the developer. 11. All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment If located in public maintenance areas, the design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Department 12 Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of Xeriscape as defined in Chapter 19 16 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code G. Signs The signs indicated on the submitted plans are conceptual only and not a part of this approval Any signs proposed for this development shall comply with the Sign Ordinance and shall require separate application and approval by the Planning Department prior to installation of any signs 2 A Uniform Sign Program for this development shall be submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. H. Environmental 1 Noise levels shall be monitored after construction to verify the adequacy of the mitigation measures Noise levels shall be monitored by actual noise level readings taken on- and off-site A final acoustical report shall be submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to final occupancy release The final report shall also make recommendations as to additional mitigation measures to reduce noise levels to below City standards, such as, residential exterior noise levels to below 60 dBA and interior noise attenuation to below 45 dBA 2 A final acoustical report shall be submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits The final report shall discuss the level of interior noise attenuation to below 45 CNEL, the building materials and construction techniques provided, and if appropriate, verify the adequacy of the mitigation measures. The building plans will be checked for conformance with the mitigation measures contained in the final report 3 The applicant shall submit certification from an acoustical engineer that all recommendations of the acoustical report were implemented in construction, including measurements of interior and exterior noise levels to document compliance with City standards Certification shall be submitted to the Building & Safety Department prior to final occupancy release of the affected homes APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: NOTE: ANY REVISIONS MAY VOID THESE REQUIREMENTS AND NECESSITATE ADDITIONAL REVIEW(S) I. General Requirements Submit five complete sets of plans including the following a Site/Plot Pian, b Foundation Plan, 5 Completion Date / / / / / / _/ /_ / / -/-/~ / / / / -/-/- / / I \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2007 Res & Stf Rpt\DRC2006-00341StdConds 6-27 doc C,D,E,F,G 452 Project No DRC2006-00341 Completion Date c Floor Plan, d. Ceiling and Roof Framing Plan, e. Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of the main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams, f Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams, water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning, and g Planning Department Project Number (DRC2006-00341) clearly identified on the outside of all plans 2 Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a soils report Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are required prior to plan check submittal. 3 Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers' Compensation coverage to the City prior to permit issuance 4 Separate permits are required for fencing and/or walls J. Site Development 1 Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction All plans shall be marked with the protect file number (DRC2006-00341) The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted California Codes, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application Contact the Building and Safety Department for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts 2 Prior to issuance of building permits for a new residential project or mayor addition, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate Such fees may include, but are not limited to' City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Check Fees, Construction and Demolition Diversion Program deposit and fees and School Fees Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Building and Safety Department prior to permit issuance 3 Street addresses shall be provided by the Building and Safety Official after tract/parcel map recordation and prior to issuance of building permits 4 Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m Monday through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays 5 Construct trash enclosure(s) per City Standard (available at the Planning Department's public counter) 6 Submit pool plans to the County of San Bernardino's Environmental Health Services Department for approval K. New Structures Provide compliance with the California Building Code (CBC) for property line clearances considering use, area, and fire-resistiveness 2 Provide compliance with the California Building Code for required occupancy separations 3 Roofing material shall be installed per the manufacturer's "high wind" instructions 6 • / / / / / / / / -/-/- / / / / / / / / -/-/- / / / / w I \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2007 Res & Stf Rpt\DRC2006-00341StdConds 6-27 doc C, D, E,F,G 453 Project No DRC2006-00341 Completion Date 4 Provide draft stops in attic areas, not to exceed 3,000 square feet, in accordance with CBC _/_/_ Section 1505 5 Provide draft stops in attics in line with common walls _/_/_ 6 Exterior walls shall be constructed of the required fire rating in accordance with CBC Table 5-A _/_/_ 7 Openings in exterior walls shall be protected in accordance with CBC Table 5-A _/_/_ 8. If the area of habitable space above the first floor exceeds 3,000 square feet, then the _/_/_ construction type shall be V-1 Hour minimum 9 Walls and floors separating dwelling units in the same building shall be not less than 1-hour _/_/_ fire-resistive construction L. Grading 1 Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with California Building Code, City Grading _/_/_ Standards, and accepted grading practices. The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved grading plan 2 A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to _/_/_ perform such work. 3. A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the _/_/_ time of application for grading plan check 4 The final grading plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, _/_/_ submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of building permits. • 5 A separate grading plan check submittal is required for all new construction protects and for _/_/_ existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill The grading plan shall be prepared, stamped, and signed by a California registered Civil Engineer M. Additional Requirements/Comments 1 The project shall fully comply with accessibility requirements of 2001 California Building Code _/_/_ Chapter 11A (Housing Accessibility) APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: N. Dedication and Vehicular Access 1 Rights-of-way and easements shall be dedicated to the City for all interior public streets, _/_/_ community trails, public paseos, public landscape areas, street trees, traffic signal encroachment and maintenance, and public drainage facilities as shown on the plans and/or tentative map Private easements for non-public facilities (cross-lot drainage, local feeder trails, etc) shall be reserved as shown on the plans and/or tentative map 2 Dedication shall be made of the following rights-of-way on the perimeter streets (measured from _/_/_ street centerline) 60 total feet on Foothill Boulevard _/_/_ 44 total feet on Grove Avenue _/_/_ 7 I \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2007 Res & Stf Rpt\DRC2006-00341StdConds 6-27 doc C, D, E,F,G 454 Protect No DRC2006-00341 Completion Date 3. Corner property Ilne cutoffs shall be dedicated per City Standards 4 Reciprocal access easements shall be provided ensuring access to all parcels by CC&Rs or by deeds and shall be recorded concurrently with the map or prior to the issuance of building permits, where no map is involved 5 Reciprocal parking agreements for all parcels and maintenance agreements ensuring point maintenance of all common roads, drives, or parking areas shall be provided by CC & R's or deeds and shall be recorded prior to, or concurrent with, the final parcel map 6 All existing easements lying within future rights-of-way shall bequit-claimed or delineated on the final map 7 Easements for public sidewalks and/or street trees placed outside the public right-of-way shall be dedicated to the City O. Street Improvements 1 All public improvements (interior streets, drainagefacilities, communitytrails, paseos, landscaped areas, etc) shown on the plans and/or tentative map shall be constructed to City Standards Interior street improvements shall include, but are not limited to, curb and gutter, AC pavement, drive approaches, sidewalks, street lights, and street trees 2 Pursuant to City Council Resolution No 88-557, no person shall make connections from a source of energy, fuel or power to any building service equipment which is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Council, except that in developments containing more than one building or unit, the development may have energy connections made to a percentage of those buildings, or units proportionate to the completion of improvements as required by conditions of approval of development In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings or units be connected to energy prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of approval of development 3 Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to Street Name Curb & Gutter A.C. Pvmt Side- walk Drive Appr. Street Lights Street Trees Comm Trail Medan Island Bike Trail Other Foothill Boulevard X X (c) X X (d) Grove Avenue X X X X Red Hlll Country Club Drive X X X X X Notes (a) Median island includes landscaping and irrigation on meter (b) Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check (c) If so marked, sidewalk shall be curvilinear per Standard 114 (d) If so marked, an in-lieu of construction fee shall be provided for this item 4 Improvement Plans and Construction a Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first / / -/-/- / / -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- / / / / -/-/ • 8 I \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2007 Res & Stf Rpt\DRC2006-00341 StdConds 6-27 doc C, D, E,F,G 455 Project No DRC2006-00341 Completion Date b. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a _/_/_ construction permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office in addition to any other permits required c Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and _/_/_ interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer d Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction _/_/_ project along mayor or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer Notes 1) Pull boxes shall be No 6 at intersections and No 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer 2) Conduit shall be 3-inch galvanized steel with pull rope or as specified e. Handicapped access ramps shall be installed on all corners of intersections per City _/_/_ Standards or as directed by the City Engineer f Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with _/_/ adequate detours during construction Street or lane closure permits are required. A cash _ deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. g. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks Under sidewalk drains shall be _/_/ installed to City Standards, except for single family residential lots. _ h. Street names shall be approved by the Planning Director prior to submittal for first plan _/_/_ check 5 Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in _/_/_ accordance with the City's street tree program 9 I \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2007 Res & Stf Rpt\DRC2006-00341 StdConds 6-27 doc C, D,E,F,G 456 Project No DRC2006-00341 Completion Date 6 Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows The completed legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street Improvement plans Street Improvement plans shall Include a Ilne Item within the construction legend stating "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on sheet_(typically sheet 1)." Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans The City Engineer reserves the right to adjust tree species based upon field conditions and other variables For additional Information, contact the Project Engineer. Mm Grow Street Name Botanical Name Common Name Space Spacing Size Qty. Foothill Boulevard Non-Activity Centers - Prunus Blireiana NCN 3 ft 20 ft o c - 15-gal Fill-in Accent Tree Informal groupings not more than 25% of total frontage trees Non-Activity Centers Platanus racemosa California Sycamore 8 ft 35 ft o c - 15-gal Informal groupings Non-Activity Centers Platanus acerifolia London Plane Tree 30 ft o c - 15-gal Informal rou in s Tree Wells Lagerstroemia Pink Crape Myrtle 3 ft Per tree well 24-inch indica "Tuscarora" design box Grove Avenue Hymenosprorum Sweetshade 5 ft 20 fl o c 15-gal flavum Red Hill CC Drive N/o Foothill Boulevard Platanus acerifolia London Plane Tree 8 ft 30 ft 15-gal Construction Notes for Street Trees. 1) All street trees are to be planted In accordance with City standard plans. 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City Inspector Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill soil amendments, as determined by the Clty Inspector 3) All street trees are subject to Inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Department. 4) Street trees are to be planted per public Improvement plans only P 7 Intersection Ilne of sight designs shall be reviewed by the Clty Engineer for conformance with adopted policy On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all project intersections, Including driveways Local residential street intersections and commercial or industrial driveways may have lines of sight plotted as required Public Maintenance Areas 1 A signed consent and waiver form to loin and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the Clty Engineer prior to final map approval or Issuance of building permits whichever occurs first Formation costs shall be borne by the developer 2 Parkway landscaping on the following street(s) shall conform to the results of the respective Beautification Master Plan Foothill Boulevard / / -/-/. -/-/- -/-/- • • 10 I \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2007 Res & Stf Rpt\DRC2006-00341 StdConds 6-27 doc C, D, E,F,G 457 Project No DRC2006-00341 Q. Drainage and Flood Control • 1 The protect (or portions thereof) is located within a Flood Hazard Zone, therefore, flood protection measures shall be provided as certified by a registered Clvll Engineer and approved by the City Engineer 2 It shall be the developer's responsibility to have the current FIRM Zone AO designation removed from the project area The developer shall provide drainage and/or flood protection facilities sufficient to obtain an unshaded "X" designation. The developer's engineer shall prepare all necessary reports, plans, and hydrologic/hydraulic calculations A Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) shall be obtained from FEMA prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first A Letter of Map Revision (LOMB) shall be issued by FEMA prior to occupancy or improvement acceptance, whichever occurs first 3. A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first All drainage facilities shall be installed as required by the City Engineer. 4 A permit from the San Bernardino County Flood Control District is required for work within its right-of-way 5 Trees are prohibited within 5 feet of the outside diameter of any public storm drain pipe measured from the outer edge of a mature tree trunk R. Utilities 1 The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary 2 Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the • Cucamonga Valley W ater District (CVW D), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino A letter of compliance from the CVW D is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential protects S. General Requirements and Approvals 1 Anon-refundable deposit shall be paid to the Clty, covering the estimated operating costs for all new streetlights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to building permit issuance if no map is involved 2 Prior to the issuance of building permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program The deposit is fully refundable If at least 50% of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City Form CD-1 shall be submitted to the Engineering Department when the first building permit application is submitted to Building and Safety Form CD-2 shall be submitted to the Engineering Department within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition protect APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DEPARTMENT, FIRE PROTECTION PLANNING SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: • SEE ATTACHED 11 I \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2007 Res & Stf Rpt\DRC2006-00341 StdConds 6-27 doc Completion Date -/-/- / / -/-/- / / ! / / / / / -/-/- / / C,D,E,F,G 458 . ~~,~,,aoxoA~~ ~ Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District i 3 ~~ t =~ Fire Construction Services ~, ., STANDARD CONDITIONS August 16, 2006 Arbors at Route 66 Charles Joseph & Associates 8212 Red Hill County Club Drive Mixed Use Subdivision SUBTT18179 & DRC2006-00341 THE FOLLOWING STANDARD CONDITIONS APPLY TO THIS PROJECT. The RCFPD Procedures & Standards which are referenced in this document can be access on the web at httq://www.ci rancho-Cucamonga ca.us/fire/index htm under the Fire Safety Division & Fire Construction Services section. Search by article; the preceding number of the standard refers to the article. Chose the appropriate article number then a drop down menu will appear, select the • corresponding standard FSC-1 Public and Private Water Supply 1. Design guidelines for Fire Hydrants The following provides design guidelines for the spacing and location of fire hydrants. a. The maximum distance between fire hydrants in commercial/industrial projects is 300 feet No portion of the exterior wall shall be located more than 150 feet from an approved fire hydrant For cul-de-sacs, the distance shall not exceed 100 feet. b The maximum distance between fire hydrants in multi-family residential protects is 400 feet No portion of the exterior wall shall be located more than 200 feet from an approved fire hydrant For cut-de-sacs, the distance shall not exceed 150 feet. c The maximum distance between fire hydrants in single-family residential protects is 500 feet No portion of the exterior wall facng the addressed street shall be more than 250 feet from an approved fire hydrant For cut-de-sacs, the distance shall not exceed 200 feet d For single-family residential projects in the designated Hazardous Fire Area, the maximum distance between fire hydrants is 400 feet No portion of the exterior wall facing the addressed street shall be more than 200 feet from an approved fire hydrant For cut-de-sacs, the distance shall not exceed 150 feet. e Fire hydrants are to be located The preferred locations for fire hydrants are C,D,E,F,G 459 i. At the entrance(s) to a commercial, industrial or residential protect from the public roadways ii. At intersections. iii. On the right side of the street, whenever practical and possible iv. As required by the Fire Safety Division to meet operational needs of the Fire District. v. A minimum of forty feet (40') from any building If any portion of a faality or building is located more than 150 feet from a public fire hydrant measured on an approved route around the exterior of the facility or building, additional private or public fire hydrants and mains capable of supplying the required fire flow shall be provided g. Provide one fire hydrant for each 1,000 gpm of required fire flow or fraction thereof FSC-2 Fire Flow 1. The required fire flow for this protect is 1,500 gallons per minute at a minimum residual pressure of 20-pounds per square inch. This requirement is made in accordance with Fire Code Appendix III-A, as adopted by the Fire District Ordinances 2 The required minimum fire flow for this protect, when automatic fire sprinklers are installed is 1500gallons per minute at a minimum residual pressure of 20-pounds per square inch. This flow • reflects a 50-percent reduction for the installation of an approved automatic fire sprinkler system in accordance with NFPA 13 or 13R with central station monitoring. This requirement is made m accordance with the California Fire Code Appendix III-A, as adopted by the Fire District Ordinances 3. The required minimum fire flow for structures located m the designated hazardous fire area shall be not less than 1,750 gpm at 20-psi residual For structures in excess of 36,000 square feet use CFC Table A-III-A-1 4 Public fire hydrants located within a 500-foot radius of the proposed project may be used to provide the required fire flow subject to Fire District review and approval. Private fire hydrants on adjacent property shall not be used to provide required fire flow 5 Firewater plans are required for all projects that must extend the existing water supply to or onto the site Building permits will not be issued until fire protection water plans are approved. 6 On all site plans to be submitted for review, show all fire hydrants located within 600 feet of the proposed protect site. FSC-3 Prerequisite for submittal of Overhead Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems Prior to submitting plans for an overhead automatic fire sprinkler system, the applicant shall submit plans, speafications and calculations for the fire sprinkler system underground supply piping . Approval of the underground supply piping system must be obtained prior to submitting the overhead fire sprinkler system plans 2 C,D,E,F,G 460 FSC-4 Requirements for Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems • Rancho Cucamonga Fire District Ordinance 15, the 2001 California Fire Code and/or any other applicable standards require an approved automatic fire sprinkler system to be installed in: Commercial or industrial structures greater than 7,500 square feet 2. Group "A" Occupancies. 3 "E" Occupancies with an occupant load of 50 or more persons. 4 Multi-family residential structures in excess of 4 units 5. All structures that do not meet Fire District access requirements (see Fire Access) 6 When required fire flow cannot be provided due to inadequate volume or pressure. 7. When the building access does not meet the requirements of the 2001 California Building Code and the RCFPD Fire Department Access -Fire Lane Standard #9-7. 8. When any applicable code or standard requires the structure to be sprinklered FSC-5 Fire Alarm System 1 RCFPD Ordinance 15, based on use or floor area (or by other adopted codes or standards) • requires an automatic and/or manual fire alarm system. Refer to RCFPD Ordinances 15 and 39, the California Building Code, RCFPD Fire Alarm Standard #10-6 and/or the California Fire Code. 2. Prior to installation of the building fire alarm system, Fire Construction Services' plan check approval and a building permit must be obtained Plans and specifications shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services in accordance with RCFPD Fire Alarm Standard #10-6. FSC-6 Fire District Site Access Fire District access roadways include public roads, streets and highways, as well as private roads, streets drive aisles and/or designated fire lanes. Please reference the RCFPD Fire Department Access - Fire Lanes Standard #9-7 1 Location of Access• All portions of the structures 1st story exterior wall shall be located within 150 feet of Fire District vehicle access, measure on an approved route around the exterior of the building Landscaped areas, unpaved changes in elevation, gates and fences are deemed obstructions 2 Specifications for private Fire District access roadways per the RCFPD Standards are: a The minimum unobstructed width is 26 feet b The maximum inside turn radius shall be 24 feet. c The minimum outside turn radius shall be 50 feet. d The minimum radius for cul-de-sacs is 45 feet 3 C, D, E,F,G 461 e The minimum vertical clearance is 14 feet, 6 inches. f. At any private entry median, the minimum width of traffic lanes shall be 20 feet on each side. • g. The angle of departure and approach shall not exceed 9 degrees or 20 percent. h. The maximum grade of the driving surface shall not exceed 12 percent i. Support a minimum load of 70,000 pounds gross vehicle weight (GVW) I Trees and shrubs planted adjacent to the fire lane shall be kept trimmed to a minimum of 14 feet, 6 inches from the ground up. Vegetation shall not be allowed to obstruct Fire Department apparatus. 3 Access Doorways: Approved doorways, accessible without the use of a ladder, shall be provided as follows. a. In buildings without high-piled storage, access shall be provided in accordance with the 2001 California Building Code, Fire and/or any other applicable standards. b. In buildings with high-piled storage access doors shall be provided in each 100 lineal feet or maior fraction thereof, of the exterior wall that faces the required access roadways. When railways are installed provisions shall be made to maintain Fire District access to all required openings 4. Access Walkways Hardscaped access walkways shall be provided from the fire apparatus access road to all required building exterior openings 5. Commercial/Industrial Gates: Any gate installed across a Fire Department access road shall be • m accordance with Fire District Standard #9-2 The following design requirements apply a. The gate shall be motorized and slide open horizontally or swing inward. b All gates must open at the rate of one second for each one-foot of required width c When fully open, the minimum width shall be 20 feet d Gates are not required to be motorized 6 Residential gates installed across Fire District access roads shall be installed in accordance with RCFPD Residential Gate Standard #9-1 The following design requirements apply: a. All automatic gates shall be provided with a Fire District approved, compatible traffic pre-emption device The devices shall be digital Analog devices are not acceptable. Devices shall be installed in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions and specfications b. Vehicle access gates shall be provided with an approved Fire District Knox Key Switch c The key switch shall be located outside and immediately adJacent to the gate for use m the event that the traffic pre-emption device fails to operate d A traffic loop device must be installed to allow exiting from the complex e The gate shall remain in the open position for not less than 20 minutes and shall automatically reset 4 C,D,E,F,G 462 7. Fire Lane Identification: Red curbing and/or signage shall identify the fire lanes. A site plan illustrating the proposed delineation that meets the minimum Fire District standards shall be • included in the architectural plans submitted to B&S for approval 8. Approved Fire Department Access: Any approved mitigation measures must be clearly noted on the site plan A copy of the approved Alternative Method application, if applicable, must be reproduced on the architectural plans submitted to B&S for plan review. 9 Roof Access: There shall be a means of fire department access from the exterior walls of the buildings on to the roofs of all commercial, industrial and multi-family residential structures with roofs less than 75 feet above the level of the fire access road. a. This access must be reachable by either fire department ground ladders or by an aerial ladder. b. A minimum of one ladder point with a fixed ladder shall be provided in buildings with construction features, or high parapets that inhibit roof access. c. The number of ladder points may be required to be increased, depending on the building size and configuration d. Regardless of the parapet height or construction features the approved ladder point shall be identified in accordance to the roof access standard. e. Where the entire roof access is restricted by high parapet walls or other obstructions, a permanently mounted access ladder is required. • f. Multiple access ladders may be required for larger buildings. g. Ladder construction must be in accordance with the RCFPD Roof Access Standard 9-9 Appendix A and drawings 9-9a and 9-9b. h. A site plan showing the locations of the roof ladder shall be submitted during plan check i. Ladder points shall face a fire access roadway(s). FSC-9 Single-family Residential Sales Model homes require approved Fire District vehicle access and water supply from a public or private water main system before construction. FSC-10 Occupancy and Hazard Control Permits Listed are those Fire Code permits commonly associated with the business operations and/or building construction. Plan check submittal is required with the permit application for approval of the permit, field inspection is required prior to permit issuance General Use Permit shall be required for any activity or operation not specifically described below, which in the judgment of the Fire Chief is likely to produce conditions that may be hazardous to life or property • Magnesium Working • Application of Flammable Finishes • Candles and open flames in assemblies • Compressed Gases • Public Assembly • Dry Cleaning Plants public Flammable and Combustible Liquids Hazardous Materials Tents, Canopies and/or Air Supported Structures Liquefied Petroleum Gases LPG or Gas Fuel Vehicles in Assembly Buildings 5 C, D, E,F,G 463 FSC-11 Hazardous Materials -Submittal to the County of San Bernardino The San Bernardino County Fire Department shall review your Business Emergency/Contingency Plan for compliance with minimum standards. Contact the San Bernardino County Fire, Hazardous Materials Division at (909) 387-4631 for forms and assistance. The County Fire Department is the Cal/EPA Certified Unified Program Agency (CUPA) for the City of Rancho Cucamonga If the faality is a NEW business, a Certificate of Occupancy issued by Building & Safety will not be finalized until the San Bernardino County Fire Department reviews your Business Emergency/Contingency Plan. California Government Code, Section 65850 2 prohibits the City from issuing a final Certificate of Occupancy unless the applicant has met or is meeting specific hazardous materials disclosure requirements A Risk Management Program (RMP) may also be required if regulation substances are to be used or stored at the new facility. 2. Any business that operates on rented or leased property which is required to submit a Plan, is also required to submit a notice to the owner of the property m writing stating that the business is subject to the Business Emergency/Contingency Plan mandates and has complied with the provisions. The tenant must provide a copy of the Plan to the property owner within five (5) working days, if requested by the owner. FSC-12 Hazardous Materials -Submittal to Fire Construction Services Plans shall be submitted and approved prior to construction equipment designed to store, use or dispense hazardou 2001 California Building, Fire, Mechanical, Plumbing, Electrical FD39 and other implemented and/or adopted standards. FSC-13 Alternate Method Application of buildings and/or the installation of s materials m accordance with the Codes, RCFPD Ordinances FD15 and Fire Construction Services staff and the Fire Marshal will review all requests for alternate method, when submitted. The request must be submitted on the Fire District "Application for Alternate Method" form along with supporting documents and payment of the $92 review fee. FCS-14 Map Recordation RECIPROCAL AGREEMENTS for Fire Department Emergency Access and Water Supply are required on this project The project appears to be located on a property that is being subdivided. The reciprocal agreement is required to be recorded between property owners and the Fire District. The recorded agreement shall include a copy of the site plan. The Fire Construction Services shall approve the agreement, prior to recordation The agreement shall be recorded with the County of San Bernardino, Recorders Office Reciprocal access agreement -Please provide a permanent access agreement between the owners granting irrevocable and anon-exclusive easement, favoring the Fire District to gain access to the subject property The agreement shall include a statement that no obstruction, gate, fence, building or other structure shall be placed within the dedicated access, without Fire Department approval. The agreement shall have provisions for emergency situations and the assessing of cost recovery to the property by the fire District 6 • C, D, E,F,G 464 Reciprocal water covenant -Please provide a permanent maintenance and service covenant between the owners granting an irrevocable and non-exclusive easement, favoring the Fire District for the purpose of accessing and maintaining the private water mains, valves and fire hydrants (fire protection systems facilities in general). The covenant shall have provisions for emergency situations and the assessing of cost recovery to the property by the fire District. FCS-15 Annexation of the parcel map: Annexation of the parcel map into the Community Facilities District #85-1 or #88-1 is required prior to the issuance of grading or building permits. Chronological Summary of RCFPD Standard Conditions PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS -Please complete the following prior to the issuance of any building permits: 1 Private Water Supply (Fire) Systems: The applicant shall submit construction plans, specifications, flow test data and calculations for the private water main system for review and approval by the Fire District. Plans and installation shall comply with Fire District Standards Approval of the on-site (private) fire underground and water plans is required prior to any building permit issuance for any structure on the site Private on-site combination domestic and fire supply system must be designed m accordance with RCFPD Standards # 9-4, #10-2 and #10-4 The • Building & Safety Division and Fire Construction Services will perform plan checks and inspections. All private on-site fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable prior to delivering any combustible framing materials to the site. Fire construction Services will inspect the installation, witness hydrant flushing and grant a clearance before lumber is dropped 2. Public Water Supply (Domestic/Fire) Systems: The applicant shall submit a plan showing the locations of all new public fire hydrants for the review and approval by the Fire District and CVWD On the plan, show all existing fire hydrants within a 600-foot radius of the project. Please refierence the RCFPD Water Plan Submittal Procedure Standard # 9-8 All required public fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable prior to delivering any combustible framing materials to the site. CVWD personnel shall inspect the installation and witness the hydrant flushing Fire Construction Services shall inspect the site after acceptance of the public water system by CVWD Fire Construction Services must grant a clearance before lumber is dropped 3 Fuel Modification Plans Please refer to RCFPD Summary of Fire Hazardous Area requirements 4. Construction Access The access roads must be paved m accordance with all the requirements of the RCFPD Fire Lane Standard #9-7 All temporary utilities over access roads must be installed at least 14 feet 6 inches above the finished surface of the road 5. Fire Flow: A current fire flow letter from CVWD must be received The applicant is responsible for • obtaining the fire flow information from CVWD and submitting the letter to Fire Construction Services 7 C, D, E,F,G 465 6. Easements and Reciprocal Agreements: All easements and agreements must be recorded with the County of San Bernardino • PRIOR TO THE RELEASE OF TEMPORARY POWER The building construction must be substantially completed in accordance with Fire Construction Services' "Temporary Power Release Checklist and Procedures". PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY OR FINAL INSPECTION -Please complete the following: Hydrant Markers: All fire hydrants shall have a blue reflective pavement marker indicating the fire hydrant location on the street or driveway in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Standard Plan 134, "Installation of Reflective Hydrant Markers". On private property, the markers shall be installed at the centerline of the fire access road, at each hydrant location 2. Private Fire Hydrants. For the purpose of final acceptance, a licensed sprinkler contractor, in the presence of Fire Construction Services, shall conduct a test of the most hydraulically remote on-site fire hydrants. The underground fire line contractor, developer and/or owner are responsible for hiring the company to perform the test A final test report shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services verifying the fire flow available. The fire flow available must meet or exceed the required fire flow in accordance with the California Fire Code. 3. Fire Sprinkler System. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler system(s) shall be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services 4. Fire Sprinkler Monitoring Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler monitoring system must be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services. The fire sprinkler monitoring system shall be installed, tested and operational immediately following the completion of the fire sprinkler system (subject to the release of power) 5 Fire Suppression Systems and/or other special hazard protection systems shall be inspected, tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services before occupancy is granted and/or equipment is placed in service. 6. Fire Alarm System. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire alarm system shall be installed, inspected, tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services 7 Access Control Gates: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, vehicular gates must be inspected, tested and accepted in accordance with RCFPD Standards #9-1 or #9-2 by Fire Construction Services. 8. Fire Access Roadways: Prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, the fire access roadways must be installed in accordance with the approved plans and acceptable to Fire Construction Services The CC&R's, the reciprocal agreement and/or other approved documents shall be recorded and contain an approved fire access roadway map with provisions that prohibit parking, specify the method of enforcement and identifies who is responsible for the required annual inspections and the maintenance of all required fire access roadways. • 8 C, D, E,F,G 466 9. Address Prior to the granting of occupancy, single-family dwellings shall post the address with minimum 4-inch numbers on a contrasting background The numbers shall be internally or • externally illuminated during periods of darkness. The numbers shall be visible from the street When building setback from the public roadway exceeds 100 feet, additional 4-inch numbers shall be displayed at the property entry. 10 Address• Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, commercial/industrial and multi- family buildings shall post the address with minimum 8-inch numbers on contrasting background, visible from the street and electrically illuminated during periods of darkness. When the building setback exceeds 200 feet from the public street, an additional non-illuminated 6-inch minimum number address shall be provided at the property entrance Larger address numbers will be required on buildings located on wide streets or built with large setbacks in multi-tenant commercial and industrial buildings. The suite designation numbers and/or letters shall be provided on the front and back of all suites. 11 Hazardous Materials: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the applicant must demonstrate (m writing from the County) that the facility has met or is meeting the Risk Management Plan (RMP) or Business Emergency/Contingency Plan with the San Bernardino County Fire Department, Hazardous Materials/Emergency Response and Enforcement Division The applicant must also obtain inspection and acceptance by Fire Construction Services. 12 Confidential Business Occupancy Information: The applicant shall complete the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District "Confidential Business Occupancy Information" form This form provides contact information for Fire District use in the event of an emergency at the subject building or property This form must be presented to the Fire Construction Services Inspector. • 13 Mapping Site Plan: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, a 8'/z-inch by 11-inch or 11-inch by 17-inch site plan of the site in accordance with RCFPD Standard #13-1 shall be revised by the applicant to reflect the actual location of all devices and building features as required m the standard. The site plan must be reviewed and accepted by the Fire Inspector. r 9 C, D, E,F,G 467 4' -~` } From: To:94772847 June 26, 2007 Mr James R Troyer, AICP Planning Director City of Rancho Cucamonga P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Dear Mr Troyer. 06/27/2007 13:41 #592 P 0011002 ~~~ Public Works Department Development Services 460 North Euclid Avenue Upland, CA 91786 Telephone (909) 931-4145 Facsimile (909) 931-4321 Cf~`Y 0~ RANGND CUCA~iONGC~ ,~UI~ > ~ 200` 1~v=cl~~~~~ - ~~A~r~~N~ SUBJECT: ARBORS AT ROUTE 66 MIXED-USE PROJECT TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS Dear Mr Troyer. Upland staff has reviewed the subject report and have the following continuing concerns 1. The traffic study does not indicate that the project would have a reduced traffic impact ~f a second controlled access was provided to Red Hill Country Club Drive. 2 The traffic impacts and off-street parking issues resulting from the proposed project need to be addressed as they relate to the Grove Avenue residential area in Upland. The overall issues are very similar to those being addressed for the areas accessed by Red Hill Country Club Drive. Three changes are requested to your Planning Commission Resolution No 07-38 as follows. 1 Planning Department: Condition No 7 should be modified to require the installation of a protected left-turn signal for southbound Grove Avenue on to Foothill Boulevard without reference to warrant studies Fde Name R ~DeelArbors at Route 66 Muted-Use TlA 6 25 07 dot From: To:94772847 06/27/2007 13:42 #592 P 0021002 2. Engineering Department: Condition No.2 should be modified to require the developer to secure a quitclaim of the easement for street purposes from the City of Upland and conveyance directly to the City of Rancho Cucamonga We are concerned that the easement for the street remains in public control as there are street improvements already in place. 3. Engineering Department Condition 3a should be added to continue prohibiting parking on the east side of Grove Avenue adjacent to the project If you have any questions, please call me at (909) 931-4131 Sincerely, ~ G~! ~'\ Jeffirey A Bloom Community Development Director PO Box 460 Upland, CA 91785-0460 7eiephone (909) 931-4131 Fax (909) 931-4321 Email ibloomCc~ci upland ca us Cc, Anthony La, Public Works Director Paul Martin, RBF Consulting Fde Name R 1DeeWrbors at Route 66 Moced-Use TIA 8 25 07 doc ~~ ~ ~ ~ a~ ~ L~ • THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ' HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AGENDA RANCHO G'UCAMONGA JULY 11, 2007 7:00 P M Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center Council Chambers 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California MEETING CANCELED LACK OF QUORUM 1, Lo-s J Schrader, Planning Comm-ss-on Secretary of the C-ty of Rancho Cucamonga, or my des-gnee, hereby cert-fy that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on July 5, 2007, at least 72 hours pnor to the meet-ng per Government Code Sect-on 54964 2 at 10500 C-v-c Center Dnve, Rancho Cucamonga s.•6~,..y~--~