Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2007/11/14 - Agenda Packet• r~ LJ L~ THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA G'UCAMONGA NOVEMBER 14, 2007 - 7:00 PM Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center Council Chambers 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California I. CALL TO ORDER Pledge of Allegiance Roll Call Chairman Stewart Vice Chairman Fletcher Munoz_ Howdyshell _ Wimberly _ II. ANNOUNCEMENTS III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Minutes of Special Joint Planning Commission/City Council Meeting dated October 22, 2007 Minutes of Regular Planning Commission Meeting dated October 24, 2007 IV. CONSENT CALENDAR The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non-controversial They will be acted on by the Commission atone trine without discussion !f anyone has concern over any item, -t should be removed for discussion A RECOMMENDATION TO QUITCLAIM VEHICULAR ACCESS RIGHTS FOR ALL LOTS ALONG ETIWANDA AVENUE WITHIN PARCEL MAPS 1299, 2151, 3368, 4029, 4929 AND WITHIN TRACT MAPS 11549-1, 12659-3, 12870, 13027, 16147, 16279-1 AND 16466 LOCATED ON BOTH 1 of 5 PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA RANCHO NOVEMBER 14, 2007 C',,UCAMONGA SIDES OF ETIWANDA AVENUE BETWEEN BASE LINE ROAD AND WILSON AVENUE B VACATION OF EXCESS DRAINAGE EASEMENT (V-212) - ALEX MA - A REQUEST TO VACATE A 5 TO 10 FOOT WIDE BY 500 FOOT LONG EXCESS DRAINAGE EASEMENT ALONG THE EAST SIDE OF ALTA LOMA CHANNEL, LOCATED BETWEEN HELLMAN AVENUE AND BERYL STREET (6928 HELLMAN AVENUE) -APN: 0202-041-62 V. PUBLIC HEARINGS The following items are public hearings rn which concerned rndrv~duals may voice their opinion of the related project Please wart to be recognized by the Chairman and address the Commission by stating your name and address All such opinions shall be Irm-ted to 5 minutes per individual for each project Please sign in after speaking C ORDINANCE REGARDING TEMPORARY SIGNS - DRC2007-00495 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A review of a draft ordinance amending Sections 14.08.350, 14 16 010(P) and 14 16 020 and adding Chapter 14 25 to the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code concerning temporary signs This item will be forwarded to the City Council for final action -CONTINUED FROM THE SEPTEMBER 26, 2007 MEETING CONTINUANCE REQUESTED TO DECEMBER 12, 2007 D ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM18196 - FERRERA - A request to subdivide a property of 1 acre into three parcels m the Low (L) Residential District and within the Etiwanda Specific Plan, located on the west side of East Avenue and south of Victoria Street at 6970 East Avenue -APN: 0227-121-34. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. CONTINUED FROM THE OCTOBER 24, 2007 MEETING. E ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND VARIANCE DRC2006-00538 - FERRERA - A request to reduce the required lot area average from 15,000 square feet to approximately 14,400 square feet m conjunction with a proposal to subdivide a property of 1 acre into three (3) parcels in the Low (L) Residential District located at 6970 East Avenue and within the Etiwanda Specific Plan -APN 0227-121-34. F. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2006-00337 - ELIAS ALFATA (for Bichara Mitre) - A request to construct a 3,300 square foot full service car wash on 85 net acre of land in the General Commercial (GC) District, located at 8517 Grove Avenue 2of5 • • - PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA RANCHO NOVEMBER 14, 2007 CUCAMONGA The proposed car wash will replace the automotive body shop, one of two existing automotive service buildings located on the subJect property - APN 0207-222-05 Related file Variance DRC2006-00737 Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration G ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND VARIANCE DRC2006-00737 - ELIAS ALFATA (for Bichara Mitre) - A request to allow a reduction in the parking setback along Arrow Route, a MaJor Arterial street, from the required 30 feet to 20 feet in conJunction with a request to build a 3,300 square foot full service car wash on 85 net acre of land in the General Commercial (GC) District, located at 8517 Grove Avenue - APN 0207- 222-05 Related file Conditional Use Permit DRC2006-00337 Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration VI. DIREC'TOR'S REPORTS H REQUEST TO INITIATE DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DRC2007-00810 - F/S MOTORSPORTS, INC (GEORGE REYNOSO) -A request to amend the Development Code, Section 17 30 to allow auto sales and leasing, subJect to a Conditional Use Permit, in the General Industrial (GI) District, Subarea 1 VIZ. PUBLIC COMMENTS This rs the trine and place for the general public to address the commrssron Items to be discussed here are those that do not already appear on this agenda VIII. COMMISSION BUSINESS/COMMENTS I UPDATE ON SELF STORAGE FACILITIES IX. ADJOURNMENT The Planning commrssron has adopted Administrative Regu/atrons that set an 11 00 p m adjournment time /f items go beyond that time, they shall be heard only with the consent of the commrssron 3 of 5 PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA RANCHO NOVEMBER 14, 2007 CAUCAMONGA 1, Lois J Schrader, Planrnng Commission Secretary of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on November 8, 2007, at least 72 hours prior to the meeting per Government Code Section 54964 2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga ~,~ If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate m this meeting, please contact the Planning Department at (909} 477-2750 Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting wdl enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility Listernng devices are available for the hearing impaired INFORMATION FOR THE PUBLIC TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION The Planning Commission encourages free expression of all points of view To allow all persons to speak, given the length of the agenda, please keep your remarks brief if others have already expressed your position, you may simply indicate that you agree with a previous speaker If appropriate, a spokesperson may present the views of your entire group To encourage all views and promote courtesy to others, the audience should refrain from clapping, booing or shouts of approval or disagreement from the audience The public may address the Planning Commission on any agenda item To address the Planning Commission, please come forward to the podium located at the center of the staff table State your name for the record and speak into the microphone After speaking, please sign in on the clipboard located next to the speaker's podium It is important to list your name, address and the agenda item letter your comments refer to Comments are generally limited to 5 minutes per individual if you wish to speak concerning an item not on the agenda, you may do sounder "Public Comments " There is opportunity to speak under this section prior to the end of the agenda Any handouts for the Planning Commission should be given to the Planning Commission Secretary for distribution to the Commissioners All requests for items to be placed on a Planning Commission agenda must be in writing The deadline for submitting these items is 6 00 p m Tuesday, one week prior to the meeting. The Planning Commission Secretary receives all such items C7 • 4of5 • r~ U r~ PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA RANCHO NOVEMBER 14, 2007 C,,,~UCAMONGA AVAILABILITY OF STAFF REPORTS Copies of the staff reports or other documentation to each agenda item are on file in the offices of the Planning Department, City Hall, located at 10500 Civic Center Dnve, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 These documents are available for public inspections during regular business hours, Monday through Thursday, 7 00 a m to 6 00 p m ,except for legal City holidays APPEALS Any interested party who disagrees with the City Planning Commission decision may appeal the Commission's decision to the City Council within 10 calendar days Any appeal filed must be directed to the City Clerk's Office and must be accomparned by a fee of $1,974 for maps and $2,073 for all other decisions of the Commission (Fees are established and governed by the City Council) Please turn off all cellular phones and pagers while the meeting is in session. Copies of the Planning Commission agendas and minutes can be found at http:Jlwww.ci.rancho-cucamonga.ca.us 5of5 Vicinity Map Planning Commission November 14, 2007 N Meeting Location: City Hall 10500 Civic Center Drive • zs~ ~ O O ~ N (I~ d: ~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O (n Z ~~~ ~ ~. ~,,~ ~s, w .. .~ .~ r ~_ _ {: N- f :r~ __ _ -__ r _ ~. ,, _ ~ ~:Y ~ ~~ _ ~~~~ ~ , _~ _ ~ ~~~~~'~ - ~ ~I ~w ~~f ,~"c-~, .:'~' '` k: '~ . ~` ~~ r I- ~:,= -~~ - i ~_ ~ ~. t ._ Y.~~ { Ik~x~ i Y ~_~ ~ , -lf (1 ~ ~ > ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ CCS -~ O p L V 0 U ~ u, O ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ `- ~ ~ ~ ~ L ~U ~ ~ ca -- o ~ ca ~ -_ 0 0 (~ U N ~ _~ O O N~ ~= M O V O O'~~ •- ~ ~ o ~ ~ - O~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~;~ ~. a~ a~ c~ L Q ly-^-i vJ ~H VJ -.~ ~u ti ~s f~. ~~ ` _ ._ ~:, _< w c G t.__ U O ~ (~ ~ ~ O ~ O ~ O U ~ `~ ° o ~ o ~ O ~ ~ N ~ N ~ O ~ ~ ~ ~, ~ ~ . • ~=+ O > ~ V ~ ~' U O cn ~ ~ y Y t~~ l {1' _ ~ r S 1.f. 4_ 0. ~ ~: 1~ _ ~ ' ~~ ~ G1 ~1y I 1~ b ;. ~ ~- lr- I rv, ~' ` ~~- ~;y . "~ . . `~ - V) ~ ~ ( ~ ~ ~ ~ _ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ ~ N O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ -~ ~ a~ ° ° ~ ~ ~, ~ ~ > ~ ~ _ C~ ~= U ~= ~ ~ - U ~ L ~ L ~ U O ~ ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ U o ~ o ~ ~ O O O ~ ~ I I` I ~ 07 I cn ~ ti f <<,- :~ ~ ; },~ a~ a~ c~ L Q 'y-^-i vJ a~ ,. ~. .~ ~- ~~~o O ~~ }~ ~ O O O ~ .~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ .- ~~~ ~ca~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~Q~~~ ~ o o ~ a~ o -~U~ ~~ a~ U ~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ U a~ o~ ~ - - ~ ~ to ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ O ~ ~ U C~ _ ~ .~ ~ c~ ~ O O p Q ~ ~ ~ - ~. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a, ~ o ~ ~ ~--~ ~ .~ O ~ ~ ~ o U ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O Q ~ ~ ~ .O ~ > ~ ~- ~ o a~ o 0 ca ~ > ~ U ~ ~ O O I I ~ ~ ~ >, .~ O U W O ~ U ~ a~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ 0 a~ ~ > __ ~ ~U ~ ~ ~ ~ +~ O .~ U ~ ~ ~~ o -- ~U Q. O c~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ c~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ Q I y1. Q N x a~ Z a~ 4~ ~~ ~ /~~ VJ O to C~ Cn O O ~. a~ .~ ^~ W ._ O cn N .~ ~ U ~, ~ - ~ . C~ Ct3 ~ ~ ~ O ~ Cn ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O OU I ^~ W .~ L O 4- ._ C6 .O O U c~ .~ I .~ -~-~ ^~ W -1±- L O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ _ ~ ca ca ~ s- - C~ O ~ •- ``- O L ~ ~ ~ ~ 4_) ~ - - ~_, ~ •- ~ U O U ~ ~ O ._ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ° o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~_ ~ U ~ ._ .~ ~ ~ U ~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Q I I 0 N _:r: =tom ~~~ ~, ~ '~,~t~~ ~'L Q x a~ Z a~ H (/~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - ~ ~ -1--+ L . ~ • V ~ ~ -~ ~ O _ ~ c~ ca a~ U ~ ~ .~ ~ L ~ ~ ~ O ~ ~ ~ O N 1 ~ O Q ~ ~ ~ >' ~~ ~ N ~ ~ •- ~ cn~~ ~cn ~O~ ~~ ~O~ ~~ ~-~c°n ~ 0°'0-~.- p~c~ ], C6 ~'V O ~ O > N -~--~ O ~~~ cn~~~'u)~~~0 cn ~ ~ a app ~~ -~~~'o ~~~~~U~°~~°~ ~ ~ O . U ~. ~ ~~1,,, ~~ ., L ~~ ~--r Q U N O ~ ~ Q ~ ~ Q 0 ~ ~U ~ ~ ~ ~ U }' ~ U ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~L ~ Z O ~ o ~ °' ~ c~ ~ ~ ~ ~ c o ~ ~ a~ ~ a U ~~~'O ~i U ~ ~ ~_ ~ ~ 4- ~~ O O ~ 4- ~~ -_ -_ ~U ~~ ~ ~- ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~U O ~ ~ ~~ ._ oU }' }' o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o a~ ~ ~ ~ _ ~~ ._ U ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .o ~ Q cn cn '~ ~ ~~~~ ~ ~~ ~ o ~ ov ~ O ~~ ~ U ~ c~ 0 ca :~ ~~ .~ ~, `~: ~ ~~ ~ '' ~ N nom ~ N N 3 U O w~ ~ (n fn ~ O .-L-. C O fn (n ~ ~ N N ~ C ~ N N i -p m c O U O j _ ~ ~ j U L O ~'^ O 0 ~ m L L r (Q ~H O X (~ ~ C S N 7 N ~ 3~ a~ 0 3 a~iU c°o ~ ~ O ~ E ~ ~ ~ _ co C ~ 2 ON C L ~ a~ x ~ _ >, O T -_ v~ U C ~ co U ~ c m ~ o J ~ -° O L C 7 O _ U C C `-' U 'O C N O ~~ O~ y C O ~ N ~ O~ O N O N N co ~,~ ~ ~ SN T E O) ~~ L 7 ~ ~ " ~, L O co U ~ ~. (n L co ~, c T L = cu ~ ~ o ~ ~ U ~ ~ E U~ o E to U -O E~ E U ^i LL (6 C ~ ~ O ~ ^^L MM 7 LL W C Q C ~ ^^L O LL~ ^^L C ^^(O LL Q LL C ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N / ~ V ~""~ C E C C ~ N^ ~ N d O d N d N d ~ rn ~ a~ a~ a~ a> ` Q L _ T O U ~ ~ U c0 (0 c0 fo C x L O W ~ .... N C O + C O ~ C O + C O L a _ w y.-. ~EEa~o + -a +-- -~ + +--~ m a~ ~- ~ U U U U w /~ LL ~' ~ L -O 0 0~ N E ~ N N ~ - cn .r _ ~ - ~° ~ 5 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ C O m m m o U a i L N L a i L a i L ° 3 ~ ~' ~ m a~ - ~ ~ i a a i i a Q1 +' C L C C C C ! ~ ~ O N N O N A C c ~ U N ~U2QC~ Q Q Q Q is __ ca cLo ~ _ ~ N ~ ~ O ~ J O O N ~ 2 O w fn ~ ~ ~ - ~ W L ~ ~ co 'o ~ o C ~ co co co c co °~ cg ~N co J 2 (6 n. co O ~ U (o ~ L O !n L ~ T L L (0 c6 N IO co > o ~ N ~ ~ C ~ U ~ ~ ~ U C N N C (p C t 7 ~ ~ '~ fn ~ L ~ O ~ 7 7 to O X 7 7 N N N "O O O~ p 0 ~ ~ O O "O 'O 7~ -O C72C~ ~ U Ud mU co t U U ~ ~ m ~ ~ as c 0 ~ o r U c U 7 U c (o 0 co o U (D ~ CD O ~ ~ L (0 C C ~ ~i U In U .,~ ~~ 1 t~:_ '.-' ~;: - .~ _ ~ ~r R l~ F,ak_. i ~ J ;~' ~ ~.'.d~` ~q 2 _ •7q~lyywl f .. _. _.:. I~~i~_... .. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ > -~ >. o -° ai rn ~ C NO L VI L ~ > J IO - N ~ L C ~ ~ c L ~ ~ ~ +L., VJ . ~ C ' ~ C C=~ ~ fn ~ i U y C O D ~ ~ ~ - N O 2 ~ N ~ N 'a 7 ~ - to ~ >. ~ ~ ~ ~ E A U ~ E - L ~ _ = ~~ O ~"- (p w L O ~ ~ O ~ J ~ 2 L ~ U to i U ~ J N c~ c o w ~ 3 c u ~ c c ~ ~ >, ~ U ~ ~ ~ ~ N ~ ti ~ y ~ 3 ~ ~ ~ EQ ~~~ ~-c ~ L, ~ ~'"~ L - ~ L L L~ ~ ~ L ~ L co = ~ m 3 3 ~ co ~ m ~ Y L c~ c - co U L Q N ~O L U fn Q N~ U ~ Q Ur U C (6 Q~ d N U Q O U Q ~ ~ ~ \ U In O L L ~ L' L ~ ~ L ~ ~ ~l+ ~ L C (B C ~ w C N y ~ (~ ~.• (0 ~ C ~ L c I6 C (6 EEO' ~~cn Eo ECt~~ EE E //~~L O /Ny LL U I..L /^L ~ ~ LL ~ ~ /^L L LL U ^^L cc~ ~M./~~ ~ LL G W ~ /~L ~O\ 4. U //L~ LL 0 ~ ~ ~ (~ N ~ ~ C ~_ N N L 7 ~ ~ a> a~ ~ ~ ~ y ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N ~ ~ ~ (0 (0 7 ~ J ~'' O O ~~ C C Q' L L N ~ a L a u _ ~° ~~ o o ~ ~~~ >c J L a i 2~~ U U ~ c~ c~~ ~ a~ ~ c d d 0 = ~ o a a- ~ o u~ o ~U O N cn u i ~ is •-• ~ i ~ U _ ~ ~ u i ~ y ~ -O U E ~ O~ ~ ~° ~~ p N N ~ ~ C ~ O~ ~ C O _ ~ C C ~ L E A ~ U -p L ~ O N O N ~ "O C E "O C U~ C ~ L d d v Q Q d U U U ~ O) ~ ~ ~ "'~ > (d Q ~ "O ~ ~ _O ~ <0 ~ ~' L N _ 1 ~ E (p ~ "O N 2 L I C (0 ~ i (0 (~ W+ C !A ~ 0 0 _ C C C~ _ 'J yL+ O 7 U ~ L "O U C ~ L S O U N ~ L U U L U CO U fn U C L CO 7 ~ ~ E ~ ~ ~ - ~ ~ °~ c - ~ c ~ c ~ - E E ~ ~ ~ o a O a~ o ~~ o m a co ~ O m o o~ m J U 2~ U ~ U~ U ~ U~ c~ m U U ~ J r N (~ N y ~ L \~\ / ~ -° E m O ~ (0 ~ - Q U ~ ~ O a C L L ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ U IB ;~ v +'hzyy' r w"ti T H E C I T Y O F RANCHO C U C A M O N G A Stiff Report DATE November 14, 2007 TO. Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM. Dan James, Senior Civil Engineer BY' Tasha Hunter, Engineering Technician SUBJECT RECOMMENDATION TO QUITCLAIM VEHICULAR ACCESS RIGHTS FOR ALL LOTS ALONG ETIWANDA AVENUE WITHIN PARCEL MAPS 1299, 2151, 3368, 4029, 4929 AND WITHIN TRACT MAPS 11549-1, 12659-3, 12870, 13027, 16147, 16279-1 AND 16466 LOCATED ON BOTH SIDES OF ETIWANDA AVENUE BETWEEN BASE LINE ROAD AND WILSON AVENUE • BACKGROUND The Etiwanda Specific Plan Section 5 31.203 Special Access Policy states: "Due to the special design character of Etiwanda Avenue, north of Base Line Road, future vehicular access to Etiwanda Avenue may be restricted to alternate access points wherever possible, with the express intent to minimize potential traffic conflicts and hazards Alternate access points may include side streets, combined driveways, rear-oriented garages and similar design solutions, depended on specific circumstances. Lots with no possibility of alternate access shall be exempted from these provisions " With this stated policy staff has processed subdivisions along Etiwanda Avenue limiting access wherever possible Also the subdivision maps dedicate vehicular access rights to the city The dedication of vehicular access rights to the City means anyone requesting a new drive approach would have to apply for a quitclaim of those rights to the City Counal. On January 10, 2007, the Planning Commission recommended a quitclaim of vehicular access rights for the property located on 12902 Cherokee Road at the intersection of Etiwanda Avenue between Base Line Road and Wilson Avenue. The City Council approved the quitclaim at the City Council Meeting on January 17, 2007. The property has installed this requested driveway Since that time, staff has received another application, copy attached, along Etiwanda • Avenue to construct a new access point to their property The request was submitted to the Public Works Subcommittee for review The Subcommittee recommended that staff process ITEM A PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT QUITCLAIM VEHICULAR ACCESS RIGHTS NOVEMBER 14, 2007 PAGE 2 the vacation of vehicular access rights for all lots along Etiwanda Avenue between Base Line Road and Wilson Avenue If approved, then Engineering would review each request for public safety and design modifications for trails, gates and fencing consistent with the neighborhood ANALYSIS The attached request for a drive approach discusses the large number of existing drive approaches along Etiwanda between Base Line Road and Wilson Avenue Staff has reviewed this area and confirms there are well over one hundred drive approaches The area is mostly developed and for the few remaining properties, when development is submitted, staff will continue to limit access where possible The Public Works Subcommittee review of the situation was that they felt the area had substantially developed They did not anticipate an on slaught of request for drive approaches The Public Works Subcommittee felt adequate review could be performed by staff The City Engineer still has authority to deny a request for a drive approach if he feels an increase in traffic conflict will occur The properties along which the vehicular access rights are being quitclaimed are developed with single family homes These properties already produce trips on Etiwanda Avenue and turning movements to side streets If any of these properties request a drive approach it would not increase vehicular traffic on Etiwanda Therefore, the quitclaiming of vehicular access rights will not be in conflict with the Etiwanda Specific Plan or General Plan • RECOMMENDATION Since the residences currently have access to their property, the quitclaiming of vehicular access rights to Etiwanda Avenue will not increase vehicular traffic on Etiwanda Avenue Therefore, staff recommends that the Planning Commission make the finding, through minute actions, that this quitclaim is in conformance with the General Plan This finding will be forwarded to the City Council for further process and final approval Respectfully submitted, ~Z~ Dan James Senior Civil Engineer DJ TH dlw Attachments Vicinity Map (Exhibit "A") Parcel/Tract Location Map (Exhibit "B") Residents Letter (Exhibit "C") A-1 • • Vicinity Map N W E S ~ify of Rancho Engineering Cucamonga Division Title: Study Area on Etiwanda Avenue Between Base Line Road & Wilson Avenue a-z Exhibit: A • r~ Parcel /Tract Location Map N W E S City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Division Title: Stud Area on Etiwanda Avenue • y Between Base Line Road & Wilson Avenue a-s Exhibit: 1B Parcel /Tract Location Map N W E S ~ify of Rancho Engineering Cucamonga Division Title: Study Area on Etiwanda Avenue Between Base Line Road & Wilson Avenue a-4 Exhibit: 2B . r-~c~~c~~~~ ce ~~'IJ~I r~ a~~ June 20, 2007 ~ ~~~~, CITY Q~ RA~~C~C~ ~UCk~iONGA dta a~tl TO: City Clerk Cb ~ `f `='~~~~` FROM: Dale Wong and Tina Muto-Wong Rancho Cucamonga 12901 Cherokee Road Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91739 We would like to appeal the denial of our request for a minimal use driveway from the back of our property onto Etiwanda Ave to access a new RV garage and 2°d unit for our elderly parents. We recognize the current status and character of the road and the desire to minimize any negative impact, as we are long time residents of this city and have lived on Etiwanda Ave. for 8 years. We have completed a review of all properties on Etiwanda Ave that fall under the Etiwanda Specific Plan, Section 5.31.203 Special Access Policy (from Baseline Rd. North to Wilson). There are 120 driveways for 88 homes, 3 churches, 3 schools 1 fire station and 1 business along this 2 mile stretch. Of the 96 properties on Etiwanda, 29 homes, 3 churches, 3 schools, 1 fire station and 1 business have multiple driveways (almost 40% of the properties on Etiwanda Ave.). Also, at least 70% (26 of the 37) of the multiple drives were added since the Etiwanda Specific Plan/Special Access Policy was implemented in 1983 The property immediately to the North of our home, 12902 Cherokee Road, has a new driveway access from Etiwanda Ave that was completed in Apri12007. Enclosed is a copy of a recent letter from the City encouraging the owners to construct a driveway to Etiwanda Ave, across the trail. The only area available for our proposed addition is the south portion of our lot. We agree that it is feasible to construct a new 150 foot long driveway from Cherokee Road full length across the east side of our property to access the addition However, that would require removal of over 1800 square feet of existing landscaping, including 3 mature trees, 14 rose bushes, 14 shrubs, an 8' by 2' raised block planter, and large sections of lawn. The result would be an excessively expensive and unsightly expanse of concrete which would severely impact the utility and attractiveness of both the back and front yards. Constructing a driveway to Etiwanda would remove only part of a hedge, a very small section of lawn, and be a far more cost effective, and green conscious choice. The adverse affects to our property, the environment, and the additional cost of building over a 150' long driveway should be weighed against the minimal impact that one additional drive onto Etiwanda would have. Our request would have no impact on the trail system, as it would leave the trail surface as is and just require the removal of two sections of railing. It would in no way increase traffic along Etiwanda, because any minimal traffic from this addition would come onto Etiwanda Ave. from Cherokee Rd. anyway if this request is denied. The fact that the Special Use Policy does not appear to have been enforced over the last 24 years, along with the adverse effects to our property and the lack of any negative impact that one additional drive will have upon Etiwanda Ave, indicate that this request should be approved. We respectfully request that you approve our driveway access to Etiwanda, or provide clear and compelling justification why it should not. Thank you for your consideration. Dale Wong °""~J T na Muto- ong a-5 EXHIBIT - C • • T H E C I T Y O F R A N G n O C U C A M O N G A Stiff Report DATE November 14, 2007 TO Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM. Dan James, Senior Civil Engineer BY. Joseph Stofa Jr., Associate Engineer SUBJECT VACATION OF EXCESS DRAINAGE EASEMENT (V-212) -ALEX MA - A REQUEST TO VACATE A 5 TO 10 FEET WIDE BY 500 FOOT LONG EXCESS DRAINAGE EASEMENT ALONG THE EAST SIDE OF ALTA LOMA CHANNEL, LOCATED BETWEEN HELLMAN AVENUE AND BERYL STREET (6928 HELLMAN AVENUE) - APN 0202-041-62. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: The subject property, 6928 Hellman Avenue, is located on the southwest corner of Mignonette Street and Hellman Avenue and contains an easement along the westerly property boundary for drainage of public waters. The easement for drainage purposes in the natural state was originally obtained by the County of San Bernardino prior to incorporation by the City of Rancho Cucamonga In 1984, the drainage area was Improved with a concrete channel thus reducing the area required for maintenance. The proposed reduction of drainage easement has been reviewed by staff and found acceptable In addition, it will reduce the maintenance liability RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission make the finding through minute action that the proposed vacation conforms to the City's General Plan. This finding well be forwarded to the City Council for further processing and final approval Respectfully submitted, ~~- Dan James Senior Civil Engineer DJ JS/rlc • Attachments Exhibit A -Vicinity Map Exhibit B -Vacation Exhibit ITEM B J'I~~ ~~~ -ii,:~nl N W E S VICINITY MAP City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Division B-1 Title: G 9~ 8 ~-{FL L f ~ i4/~/ ~ Exhibit: EXHIPIT ~~ LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR CITY PARCEL VACATION IN CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA THAT PORTION OF THE EAST ONE-HALF OF LOT 3, BLOCK 12 CUCAMONGA HOMESTEAD ASSOCIATION LANDS, IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN BOOK 6 PAGE 46 OF MAPS, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY SAID PORTION LYING WESTERLY OF A LINE DESCRIBED IN DEED RECORDED JUNE 6, 1984 AS INSTRUMENT NO 84-132673, OF OFFICIAL RECORDS, PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHEASTERLY CORNER OF PARCEL NO 2 OF PARCEL MAP NO 3189 IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CU CAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, FILED IN PARCEL MAP BOOK NO 30, PAGE 92, THENCE SOUTH 89°44'04" WEST ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID PARCEL NO 2, 146.12 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING ON A NON-TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE NORTHEAST, HAVING A RADIUS OF 465 00 FEET, TO WHICH POINT A RADIAL BEARS SOUTH 69°52'29" WEST, THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY 235 55 FEET ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 29°01'26" TO THE BEGINNING POINT OF A NON-TANGENT LINE, TO WHICH POINT A RADIAL BEARS SOUTH 40°51'03" WEST, THENCE SOUTH 47°28'00" EAST 60 74 FEET, THENCE SOUTH 49°54'50" EAST 22514 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE WEST LINE OF HELLMAN AVENUE, THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID WEST LINE SOUTH 00°30'25" EAST 6 59 FEET TO A LINE PARALLEL WITH AND DISTANT 5 00 FEET, THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE NORTH 49°54'50" WEST 225 76 FEET TO A TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHWESTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 475 00 FEET, THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 4°06'50", AN ARC LENGTH OF 3411 FEET TO A REVERSE CURVE CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 475 00 FEET, THENCE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 34°20'15", AN ARC LENGTH OF 284 67 FEET TO THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID PARCEL NO 2, THENCE EASTERLY ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE NORTH 89°44'04" EAST 10 62 TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING CONTAINS APPP,OXIMATE 4,017 SO FT -~ ~;F>`, AFFECT PARCEL OF APN 0202-04~-6~ ; ~~'_ --- ~~ Y , 9 , B-2 EXHIBIT B SE COR OF PARCEL 2 P M NO 3189, P M B 30-95 THE POINT OF BEGINNING EX 12" SEWER 10 62' THE TRUE POINT o OF BEGINNING r~ 589'44'04"W ~~ `\~\ \~ y 146 12' `\~ 63 \~~ \ i~\~ ~ X569_52'29"W ~~ ~~ \ ~ rn (RAD~ - s , \ \ ,~ ~ ~ \`\ ~ ~~ 65 ~ °\ ~ ~ \ ~` ~` \ ~' O ,, ~~ ~ ~ ~' ~~ > ~ ~.°~ FAST ~ti c EX 12" APN: 0202-041-61 --.;. ~~ % ,~ ~ n v, ~ ~,~ "qF~j I f ~ J_ ~ .,L ,,~'~ v ~ ~~ ~ ' 9 ' ---- YU~ n ,~ SCALE 1"=60' MIGNONETTE 589'44'04"W 346 12' RECORD DATA PER DEED REC JUNE 6, 1984 AS INST NO B4-132673 STREET _ (~ 356 74' 200 00' rn I u' I I 33' 6928 N. HELLMAN STREET i I RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA I APN: 0202-041-62 i I '1' ss. ,~~i ,, o^ '~~ ~~ohi~PO ~~, ~ ~ ;~ r ~, ~ /T SAS. ti ~ o~ 9cF ~.~ j~~ ,~ ~\~ ~ ~ \~ ~~C~j T F~ ,~y~ >` ~ o,. . \\`\ 1~ \\ \ 9s T ~ ~ ~~ .~ ~ \o~ ,~ ~` ~\ \ ~~ EX 12" SEWE ``~~~ \ h~ ~~`~ titi./ LEGEND ~~ / PROPOSED AREA TO BE VACATED BY THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CONTAINS APPOXIMATE 4,017 SO FT - - - LOT LINE TO BE REMOVED •--~-~ NEW LOT LINE CURVE TABLE CURVE RADIUS LENGTH ANGLE C1 475 0D' 34 11' 4'06'50" I z I I ~ I I Q z a I o ~ ~ I I ~ ~ M ~ I N I I Q I ~ I ~ w I I w I ~ I I I I !~, /J N I I // ` ~~ ~~ n ~ I I 3 ~ ~~ ~ ~ z I N I ` ~°jh o ~' 1 ~h ~~ ~ I I o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ "~',, 2 I 33' I ~~ \ ~ s, ~ ~ s. ~ ~ I EX a 12" SEWE \~ J 1 I m I ~~ \~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ I ~~ I I I MONTE VISTA AVENUE • • • B-3 Stiff Report DATE November 14, 2007 TO' Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM James R Troyer, AICP, Planning Director BY Lois Schrader, Planning Commission Secretary SUBJECT. ORDINANCE REGARDING TEMPORARY SIGNS - DRC2007-00495 -CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A review of a draft ordinance amending Sections 14 08.350, 14 16 010(P) and 14 16 020 and adding Chapter 14 25 to the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code concerning temporary signs This item will be forwarded to the City Council for final action CONTINUED FROM SEPTEMBER 26, 2007 • BACKGROUND• The City Council has expressed concerns about the proliferation of political and other temporary signage that has occurred m the community over the years To address this issue, the City Council appointed a subcommittee to study the issue Council Members Spagnolo and Gutierrez were appointed by the Council to recommend a new Ordinance to the full Council The subcommittee held two meetings regarding the Temporary Sign Ordinance. In addition to holding two meetings, the City also brought the item to a City Council study session in addition to public outreach efforts that were conducted with the Inland Valley Association of Realtors, Citrus Valley Association of Realtors and the Rancho Cucamonga Chamber of Commerce The draft Temporary Sign Ordinance was presented to the Planning Commission and the public at their regular meeting of September 26, 2007 A full analysis of what was presented is included m the September 26 staff report which has been attached for reference (Exhibit A) Members of the public representing the real estate industry testified to the importance of temporary "open house" signs to their businesses and the possible economic impact to the community at large They expressed concern that the limitations on the placement of such signs set forth in the draft ordinance could be problematic The speakers requested staff to more clearly define terms such as "right-of-way" and "easement," and to explain how these terms affect their use of temporary signs m relation to the new ordinance Comments were made concerning sign "twirlers" and "mobile" types of signage as well as the enforcement of some forms of temporary signage including the time limits for the posting of political signs Following their review of the staff report and draft ordinance, and after consideration of the public input, there was a consensus among the Commissioners that the draft ordinance needed • more work, that more participation from the business community is desired and that another workshop should be held The minutes of the meeting held on September 26 as well as the ITEM C PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2007-00495 -CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA November 14, 2007 Page 2 speaker sign in sheet are attached for reference (Exhibits B and C) The Commission therefore, asked staff to set up another workshop, and m the interim, the item was continued to the November 14, 2007 meeting Planning staff set up a workshop for November 13, 2007 at 7 00 p m to be held m the Council Chambers The Rancho Cucamonga Chamber of Commerce, the Inland Valleys Association of Realtors and the Citrus Valley Association of Realtors were speafically notified and their memberships invited to fully participate in the workshop An eighth page ad announcing the workshop and inviting public participation was also placed m the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin As of the writing of this report and the production of the agenda, nothing further has been determined for the draft ordinance pending staff's evaluation and analysis of the suggestions and ideas stemming from that workshop Staff will consider the input received at the workshop on November 13 and develop a revised draft ordinance for consideration at a future date Staff will give an oral update at the Planning Commission meeting as to the progress of this work to date • CORRESPONDENCE As of this writing, no calls or written correspondence have been received to date concerning tonight's report As previously mentioned, staff officially notified the Rancho Cucamonga Chamber of Commerce, the Inland Vaileys Association of Realtors and the Citrus Valley Association of Realtors as well as publishing an eighth page ad in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin inviting public participation at the workshop held on November 13 ,2007 • RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission continue consideration of the draft Temporary Sign Ordinance DRC2007-00495 to the December 12, 2007 Planning Commission meeting to allow staff time to develop and present a new draft ordinance for review Respectfully subpmitted, p• Jam s R Troyer, AICP Planning Director JT/Is Attachments Exhibit A -Planning Commission Staff report dated September 26, 2007 Exhibit B -Planning Commission Minutes dated September 26, 2007 Exhibit C -Planning Commission Sign in Sheet dated September 26, 2007 • C-1 Stiff Report DATE September 26, 2007 TO Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM James R. Troyer, AICP, Planning Director BY Rina Leung, Senior Planner SUBJECT ORDINANCE REGARDING TEMPORARY SIGNS - DRC2007-00495 -CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A review of a draft ordinance amending Sections 14 08 350, 14.16.010(P) and 14.16 020 and adding Chapter 14 25 to the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code concerning temporary signs This item will be forwarded to the City Council for final action BACKGROUND. Previously, the City Council has expressed concerns about the proliferation of • political and other temporary signage that has occurred in the community over the years To address this issue, the City Council appointed a subcommittee to study the issue Council Members Spagnolo and Gutierrez were appointed by the Council to recommend a new Ordinance to the full Council. The subcommittee held two meetings regarding the Temporary Sign Ordinance. In addition to holding two meetings, the City also brought the item to a City Council study session m addition to public outreach efforts that were conducted with the Inland Valley Association of Realtors, Citrus Valley Association of Realtors and the Rancho Cucamonga Chamber of Commerce INTRODUCTION The proposed Temporary Sign Ordinance will modify the existing Sign Ordinance and consist of new requirements for temporary signs The proposed Ordinance, which was developed based on input from a subcommittee, also includes provisions for yard sale and political signs. This staff report will outline a summary of the problems associated with the proliferation of temporary signs along with the functions of the subcommittee, who were assigned to develop the new temporary sign standards It will also include a description of the proposed standards that were prepared to be content neutral and m a manner that protects first amendment rights Finally, the report will address how the Ordinance will be enforced A draft Ordinance and subcommittee meeting minutes are included as attachments ANALYSIS The proposed Temporary Sign Ordinance will repeal the existing political sign section m the Municipal Code and includes new requirements for political signs that will be consistent with other types of similar temporary signs Although the City Council approved a • Yard Sale Ordinance on June 20, 2007 to adopt standards for conducting yard sales, it d-d not EXHIBIT - A c-2 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2007-00495 -CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA September 26, 2007 Page 2 include standards for yard sale signage The proposed Ordinance also will include provisions for yard sale signage that will be consistent with the standards for political signs The intent of the Ordinance is to provide regulations regarding the posting, display, maintenance, and removal of temporary signs (political, yard sale, and other similar types of temporary signs) in order to protect the First Amendment rights of persons posting such signs on their property while protecting the health, safety, and general welfare of the general public and maintaining the aesthetic qualities of the City. According to the City Attorney's office, the City cannot control political signs m a manner that is more restrictive than any other type of signage containing different content Although cities must not be more restrictive with political signs than other types of signage, cities have the authority to regulate the following o The physical characteristic of all signs as long as the regulation is content-neutral, o Size limits, o Prohibit the posting of all signs on public property, and o Cities may remove abandoned political signs only after an election • After receiving a Memorandum outlining the aforementioned items on April 5, 2007, the subcommittee developed revised sign standards that complied with the above requirements • The Ordinance will include uniform provisions for yard sale, political, and other similar types of temporary signs to prevent the problems mentioned in the background section In addition, the proposed Municipal Code amendment will prohibit all signage along the public rights-of-way The proposed Ordinance is applicable on a citywide basis and affects all properties in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The proposed Temporary Sign Ordinance includes the following items listed below o A revised definition of 'temporary sign' to include political and yard sale signs o Anew section in the Municipal Code prohibiting signs in the public rights-of-way o Anew section regulating temporary signs (yard sale, political, and other similar types of temporary signs}, which is described below. - A limit of one sign per parcel/property - A time limit for display of no more than 45 days prior to the date of the event and 10 days after the event - Size restrictions (six square feet for residential and 32 square feet for nonresidential) properties • C-3 r~ u • • PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2007-00495 -CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA September 26, 2007 Page 3 ENFORCEMENT AND EDUCATION The Temporary Sign Ordinance will be a part of the Municipal Code Since the Municipal Code currently includes enforcement provisions, it is not necessary to include an enforcement provision in the Ordinance Violators will be cited with administrative fine penalties, which are currently being developed for all violations of the Municipal Code The Code Enforcement Division will be responsible for responding to complaints and general enforcement of the Ordinance To educate the community, the Code Enforcement Division will be responsible for informing the public of the new guidelines FACTS FOR FINDING. The purpose of the proposed Temporary Sign Ordinance is to address the issues associated with the proliferation of political and other temporary signage that has occurred in the community over the years. Prior to the approval of any amendment to the Municipal Code, the Council, based upon the recommendation of the Planning Commission, must make a finding of the consistency with the General Plan ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION. The Planning Department staff has determined that the protect is exempt from the California Environment Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines The protect qualifies under Section 15061(b)(3) of the State of CEQA Guidelines because the Ordinance will impose greater limitations on uses than may be conducted on developed properties in the City and will thereby serve to reduce potential significant adverse impacts. CORRESPONDENCE This item was advertised as a public hearing m the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper with cone-eighth page ad because more than 1,000 properties would be affected by the citywide scope of the amendment (all residential districts). RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt the attached Resolution recommending approval of Municipal Code Amendment and the addition of Chapter 14.25 of the Municipal Code DRC2007-00495 to the City Council Respectfully submitted, ~• J es R Troyer, AICP Planning Director JT RL/tn/Is Attachments Draft Resolution for Development Recommending Approval to City Council Code Amendment DR2007-00495 C-4 AYES FLETCHE SHELL, MUNOZ, STEWART, WIMBERLY NOES NO ABS NE -carried • ***** D ORDINANCE REGARDING TEMPORARY SIGNS - DRC2007-00495 -CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A review of a draft ordinance amending Sections 14 08.350, 14 16 010(P) and 14 16 020 and adding Chapter 14 25 to the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code concerning temporary signs This item will be forwarded to the City Council for final action James Troyer, Planning Director, presented the staff report He said the goal of the council was to create an ordinance that is content neutral with the same set of standards and regulations He remarked that the challenge is to treat the various types of temporary signs equally Commissioner Munoz clarified that the ordinance does not single out any particular group over another Mr Troyer confirmed that all types of these signs be treated equally Commissioner Howdyshell asked for clarification regarding signs in the right of way She asked what the impact would be on realtors with their signs in the right of way Mr Troyer said that signs in the right of way were prohibited with the current ordinance and the new ordinance is the same He said it is more of an enforcement issue Commissioner Howdyshell asked if this affects sign "twirlers" Mr Troyer replied that they are prohibited in the existing ordinance and m the new draft ordinance • as well Vice Chairman Fletcher first disclosed for the record that he is a board member of the Chamber of Commerce and that the board has met to discuss their concerns regarding the proposed ordinance He noted that he has not attended or participated in any of those discussions He asked if the limit of one sign per parcel/property precludes someone from placing three signs on one parcel that would advertise three separate candidates, for example Mr Troyer stated that there can be one sign per candidate, per parcel/property Vice Chairman Fletcher asked about the change for the time limit from allowing the signs being placed 45 days in advance from 30 days in advance of the election Mr Troyer commented that it is a change that was put in place because of the timing of absentee voters He said candidates would like to place them earlier for that timing and the committee felt this would not create a mayor impact Vice Chairman Fletcher asked if this applies to billboards Mr Troyer said it does not Chairman Stewart asked if there are regulations for banners nnr Tr~~~Pr stated the current ordinance currently outlines the regulations for banners EXHIBIT - B Commission Minutes -6- September 26, 2007 C-5 Chairman Stewart opened the public hearing Steve Gomez, 11075 Kenyon Way, stated he has been in real estate for many years and has • watched the development of the City since 1979 He commented on the importance of signs to his business He said the limit of 45 days would be a challenge because it takes 4-6 months to sell a property. Mr Troyer interjected that the 45 day limit does not apply to real estate signs, because that form of advertising does not relate to a specific date (as for an event) Mr Gomez remarked that open house signs are important because they get people to properties for sale He commented that a year ago signs were not even needed but that goes in cycles and the market is now in the cycle where signs are needed He said approving this ordinance will affect them and the entire city David Skolnick, Keller Williams Realty, 5838 Etiwanda Avenue, stated his office has 167 agents He asked if they could use one sign on each parcel/private property leading up to an open house He asked if it is like the political candidates that put a little sign in every yard Mr Troyer said that is correct, that if you have a house for sale mid-block, the agent could work with the property owner and place a sign on their private property with their permission Mr Skolnick asked if the only real change for the real estate signs is the prohibition of these signs in the public right of way or on a green and he asked what consequence would be if the signs are placed there Mr Troyer remarked that they could be removed by code enforcement and that those signs are not • currently allowed m the public right of way Mr Skolnick said if they can not bring buyers to their properties, it could change the face of the industry Janice Favela, a real estate agent, 12438 High Horse Drive, asked if the real estate industry could have an accommodation like the politicians Jerry Emilio, a realtor, commented on the impact of the right of way restriction He said he is an honest citizen and he is inclined to obey the law but if others do not it would put his business at a disadvantage He said that if the policy is put into place, then it should be enforced so that those who obey it are not at a disadvantage Ryan Smith, 3690 Elizabeth Street, Riverside, said he is part of the Inland Valley Association of Realtors. He commented that he was part of a meeting with staff and that they had a good conversation about the proposed changes He said there is much confusion in his industry about the public right of way restriction and that rumors are flying about banning open house signs altogether He suggested the definition of the term "public right of way" be tightened up and he suggested that they allow signs to be placed within a specified setback from the street, such as in a greenbelt located behind a sidewalk He thanked Mr Troyer and complimented our terrific staff Bill Ruh, 655 W Arrow, San Dimas, reported that he is affiliated with the Citrus Valley Association of Realtors He concurred with his colleague and credited staff for their active involvement and getting information to the professional realtors He said there is a great deal of mis-information, and that some agents understand the draft and some do not He suggested a workshop be held so that the • information can be discussed. He asked staff for a commitment to get the information out Planning Commission Minutes -7- September 26, 2007 C-6 Mike Bailey, 8608 Utica #200, stated he is the Vice Chairman of Economic Development of the Rancho Cucamonga Chamber of Commerce He said the realtor members of the Chamber were never notified that this ordinance was being reviewed or asked to participate He said buyers cannot • find open houses He said the Chamber requests a continuance to allow for further review and so that it can more benefit the business community He commented that real estate signs are different than political signs and that this ordinance is written to benefit the politicians He commented that people cannot find businesses because of setbacks off of the street He remarked that the draft is for political signs and it needs to be different Angie Nwanodi, 7331 Shelby Place, #30, said she has been in real estate for 8 years She said the draft ordinance is overly broad She said the ordinance makes accommodations for political candidates but should also accommodate businesses, define public right of way, and allow a window of time to have signs up without penalty She commented that open house signs are only up for 3-4 hours, and realtors have a significant investment m signs and that signs are an expectation of their clients Tom Darby, Inland Valley Board of Realtors, commented that they would have to get permission to put a sign on someone else's private property and that could be difficult. He said two things are essential in selling homes, the Multiple Listing Service and signs, and this ordinance limits their ability to sell property Jerry Jacobson, 12935 Santa Barbara Road, stated he works for Tarbell Realtors He said he wanted more notice of the changes He said the symbiotic relationship between realtors and brokers make it possible for cities to achieve a higher tax base by facilitating the sale of property He said he wants the item continued to allow time for discussion and compromise. He said represented and non-represented sellers are impacted by the proposed changes He said there should be a way to dispense of the safety hazard issues, political issues, and to be able to market property • Norman Mckenzie President of the Rancho Cucamonga Chamber of Commerce, reported that they had a task force meeting regarding the proposed changes He said he was part of the meeting with staff He said there is too much ambiguity, that it needs to be reworked and more specific, it is too confusing, and that it creates rumors He said this needs to be fixed, that his fob with the Chamber is to help maintain a strong economy. Chairman Stewart closed the public hearing Mr Troyer recommended a 45 day continuance to the first meeting in November (November 14, 2007) The Commissioners indicated agreement Commissioner Munoz agreed and said there are too many questions at this time Vice Chairman Fletcher agreed He commented that the regulations do have to be content neutral, the city can regulate for esthetics but the attempt presented tonight is confusing He said it should be noted that now we have "mobile billboards" that also may have to be addressed He wanted to know if'portable' signs are being addressed He also mentioned that the reference to political signs still shows 30 days in the ordinance rather than 45 He mentioned that there is also a need for more input from the business community Chairman Stewart concurred She said allowing one sign per yard could be more problematic than placing them in the right of way She said that there is a large business community that needs to be represented here She added that more time is needed to hash it out Chairman Stewart closed the public comment period • Planning Commission Minutes -8- September 26, 2007 C-7 Motion Moved by Fletcher, seconded by Howdyshell, to continue the item to the regular meeting of November 14, 2007 to allow time for public input and more review Motion carried by the following vote AYES FLETCHER, HOWDYSHELL, MUNOZ, STEWART, WIMBERLY NOES NONE ABSENT NONE -carried ***** DIRECTOR'S REPORTS E CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2003-00719 -PACIFIC GLOBE LLC - A 6-month progress report for a previously approved 2,947 square foot gas station and convenience store and 2,504 square foot fast food restaurant on 1 48 acres of land in the Village Commercial Distract, located at the northeast corner of Day Creek Boulevard and Highland Avenue - APN 1089- 121-08 and 1089-401-66 Donald Granger, Associate Planner, presented the staff report He commented that the developer/business owner has been responsive overall to the concerns of the neighbors and made the requested adjustments needed He noted that staff has not received any further complaints since the four issues were presented to the owner He commented that staff has received an executed agreement from Caltrans making it possible for the applicant to install the required plant material and decorative lights along the Caltrans easement portion of the site Chairman Stewart invited the applicant and the public to speak if they chose to do so Seeing and hearing no further comment, she referred to the Commission for comment/direction Commissioner Munoz suggested the Commission receive the report with no further action accept • that staff follow up with the Caltrans agreement He complimented staff and the business owner for responding to the concerns and resolving the issues Commissioner Wimberly concurred He asked Engineering staff to look into the safety of the ingress and egress from Highland Avenue Vice Chairman Fletcher thanked and complimented the owner for his responsiveness Chairman Stewart agreed and did not see the necessity for any further report Motion Moved by Munoz, seconded by Fletcher, to receive and file the report with no further action deemed necessary at this time Motion carved by the following vote AYES FLETCHER, HOWDYSHELL, MUNOZ, STEWART, WIMBERLY NOES NONE ABSENT NONE -carried ***** PUBLIC COMMENTS None ***** • Planning Commission Minutes -9- September 26, 2007 C-8 Planning Commission Meeting of ~~ ~~-~ ~ ~ RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION SIGN-UP SHEET Please print your name, address, and city and indicate the item you have spoken regarding. Thank you. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10, 11, 12 13. 14. 15 16. 17. 18 19 20 21 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. NAME ADDRESS CITY ITEM ~ I -~~ ~ ~ I! - /~ ~ ~ Si / ~ 1 ~T r -~-t #~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~3~ f~ --- s~ ' ~ ~ ~ ~~- ~~7z~~ 1~ ~ G~i'r_1~i~ zc~ ~~~ ~ ~L/v tics To,~ C',~ 9©~ / / _ ~l~~Co` e-vrC ~I- ,7~ ~'~' ~ ~ b ~~9~7L7 • EXHIBIT - C C-9- DATE November 14, 2007 TO Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM James R. Troyer, AICP, Planning Director BY Tabe van der Zwaag, Associate Planner SUBJECT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM18196 - FERRERA - A request to subdivide a property of 1 acre into three (3) parcels in the Low (L) Residential District, located on the west side of East Avenue and south of Victoria Street at 6970 East Avenue -APN 0227-121-34. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND VARIANCE DRC2006-00538 - FERRERA - A request for a variance to reduce the required lot area average from 15,000 square feet to approximately 14,400 square feet in conjunction with a proposal to subdivide a property of • 1 acre into three (3) parcels in the Low (L) Residential District, located at 6970 East Avenue -APN 0227-121-34 A Background This item was originally scheduled for the October 24, 2007, Planning Commission meeting and was continued in order to properly advertise the related Variance DRC2006-00538 B Protect Density 3 dwelling units per acre C Surrounding Land Use and Zoning North - Single-Family Homes, Low Residential - Etiwanda Specific Plan (2-4 dwelling units per acre) South - Single-Family Homes, Low Residential - Etiwanda Specific Plan (2-4 dwelling units per acre) East - Single-Family Homes across East Avenue, Low Residential - Etiwanda Specific Plan (2 - 4) dwelling units per acre) West - Vacant Property, Low Residential - Etiwanda Specific Plan (2-4 dwelling units per acre) General Plan Designations Project Site -Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) North - Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) South -Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) East - Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) West - Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) D Site Characteristics The project site is located on the west side of East Avenue and south of • Victoria Street on a 1 acre parcel The parcel is generally rectangular in shape with overall dimensions of about 320 feet from east to west and about 132 feet from north to south The ITEM D & E PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM18196 & VARIANCE DRC2006-00538 -DAVID FERRERA November 14, 2007 Page 2 • existing topography slopes gently from north to south The lots to the north, south, and east are zoned Low Residential and developed with single-family residences The lot to the west is zoned Low Residential and has been approved fora 6-lot subdivision (SUBTT16578) and will be projects, with all lots taking access off of this new street ANALYSIS /BACKGROUND' A General• The applicant proposes subdividing the site into three lots There is an existing house on the site that is proposed to be removed. The lots meet all City development requirements except for the lot average (see variance request) The applicant has informed staff that he has purchased the adjacent 6-lot subdivision to the west and hopes to develop the entire site or to sell both projects to another developer B Variance• The required lot average in the Low Residential District is 15,000 square feet The proposed lot average is about 14,400 square feet The applicant has submitted a variance request to reduce the required 15,000 square foot lot average requirement with the justification being that without a variance the lots would be much larger than the 6-lot subdivision to the west with which the site will share a cul-de-sac The approved lots to the west range m size from 13,513 square feet to 16,419 square feet Staff has included a Condition of Approval which states that the future home on Lot 1, which faces East Avenue, shall be required to be developed with asingle-story home in order for the project to be more compatible with the neighboring single-story homes • FACTS FOR FINDINGS The purpose of a variance is to provide flexibility from the strict application of the development standards when special circumstances pertaining to the property such as size, shape, topography or location deprives such property of privileges enjoyed by other property in the vicinity and in the same district In order to grant a request for a variance, the Planning Commission must make a series of findings. Generally, these findings focus on unique or speaal circumstances applicable to a specific property. Following are facts to support the necessary fmdings• Finding That strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the objective of this Code Fact Without a reduction in the lot area requirement the applicant would have to subdivide the site into fewer lots that in turn would be much larger than the other lots with which it will share a new cul-de-sac, which would be inconsistent with the intent of the Development Code in terms of compatibility 2 Finding That there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or cond~t~ons applicable to the property involved or the intended use of the property that do not apply generally to other properties in the same zone Fact The reduction in the required 15,000 square foot average lot area requirement by 600 square feet per lot will allow the applicant to create lots that are substantially similar in size and character to the other lots on the proposed cul-de-sac Each of the proposed lots • would exceed the minimum depth and width requirements of the Low Residential District D&E-1 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM18196 & VARIANCE DRC2006-00538 -DAVID FERRERA November 14, 2007 • Page 3 3 Finding That strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would deprave the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in same zone Fact Without the reduction in the average lot area requirement, the site would have to be subdivided into lots that are larger in size and out of character to the lots m the surrounding neighborhood 4 Finding That the granting of the variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other propeit~es classified rn the same zone Fact The applicant is requesting to subdivide the site into lots that are at a similar density to the other lots on the cul-de-sac and more recent subdivisions to the south and east 5 Finding The granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the pub/~c health, safety, or welfare, or materially in~ur~ous to the properties or improvements in the vicinity Fact The newly created lots will be indistinguishable from the surrounding lots other than being on average 600 square feet smaller in size than the 15,000 square foot lot average requirement ~C Design Review Committee The Committee (McPhail, Stewart, and Diaz) reviewed the protect on August 14, 2007, and recommended approval (Exhibit D) D. Technical Review and Grading Committees: The Committees reviewed the protect on August 14, 2006 The protect was conceptually approved E Neighborhood Meeting A neighborhood meeting was held on July 31, 2007, at Day Creek Park A total of nine residents attended and were generally accepting of the size and layout of the lots Those m attendance raised two concerns 1) that the existing home on the site be demolished and 2) that the applicant build single story homes on the individual lots The applicant informed those in attendance that the existing home on the lot would be demolished and that no decision has been made as to whether they would develop the lots or sell them to another developer (Exhibit E) F Environmental Assessment Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, City staff prepared an initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the protect Based on the findings contained m that Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures related to construction noise, dust mitigation, and hydrology, there would be no substantial evidence that the protect would have a significant effect on the environment Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared Thereafter, City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration A Mitigation Monitoring Program has also been prepared to ensure implementation of, and compliance with, the mitigation measures for the protect CORRESPONDENCE This item was re-advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 660-foot radius of the protect site D & E- 2 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM18196 & VARIANCE DRC2006-00538 -DAVID FERRERA November 14, 2007 Page 4 • RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Tentative Parcel Map SUBTT18196 and Variance DRC2006-00538 through the adoption of the attached Resolutions of Approval with conditions espec u y su mi e , ~- Jam s R Troyer, AICP Planning Director JT TV/ge Attachments Exhibit A -Site Utilization Map Exhibit B -Tentative Parcei Map Exhibit C -Conceptual Grading Plan Exhibit D -Design Review Committee Exhibit E -Neighborhood Meeting Summary Exhibit F -Initial Study Draft Resolution of Approval for Tentative Tract Map SUBTPM18196 Draft Resolution if Approval for Variance DRC2006-00538 • • D & E- 3 • ~_ ~~ zuu Q ~ ~ > ~ ~ ---- O w 0 W Z ~ m n U ~ Q § ~ R U F a 4 ~z ~ /~ ~ ~-T~ _ aryrart Il.l O x ~ i = ~ o f E Q z ~ ~ Z ~ f ~~ ~ ljl A'..i G J r ~ W O ~ ~ I ~ ~ , ~ !n ~ i B I ~_ .--i I I ~ __ ~ III~~~ LLJJ i ~ ~ ~ ^ ~-- p ` ~~ _~ a ~ , / w~ ~I3j - ~j ~ ' ~p ~_~'----- poi LJ ~~ ~ i I~0.~ ~ \~ ~ ~~ ~ _ 121 J ~ - / W ' ~ 1Nt/7b'A ~ ~ 3 R~ ~ ' ~ ~ Q ~ ~ \ ' Op -- ~---`- n-p ~~ --~ '-----------~----anNana lsda-L---~- ---t-- 0 ~ ~-- ,~ ^ ,~ ,~, W ~ -- o ~i ~ E"' Q 121f107 ~ ' ' ~ ~~ ~15~J7~IH0 ~ ~ ~ III ,~ .~ - -- -- ~ , , ~Q ~ ~ ' W ~~ ~ Q ~~ ~ "N 1TJt10J ~ _ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ / I n ~~ ~ ~ ~ m ~ I I ~ ~ ~ II ~~ ~~~~~~ i i EXH I B IT A -------- ------- ' anr~~n~ ~doNdMila D& E-4 Nw+ac M1CV +~'/J G { sow.tOOi vas 4 ~ 3` ~ + • 6 r m ws rl trvti~ «...~y...,~.,,a.~ ' ~~ ua-u- rotr an- ronar~ aettn~t ~~4g S~ ' ~~~ R ~ ~ 1 cae~rs-a vnn s~u~~ x ~ s, ~ ~ ~ ~as~ ~~ { ~ ~~ t ~ 1 ~ ( cV ` - --- - -~- - ---' ~ ~ O '' - ~ =---- i Fyn- ~___ ,~~ - __ --- -..r_ ~'S~ ~- -d4f`R ~iBA97 - " " _ _: -..,. `~'rL ~ - _ _i_ _ _ ~ _ _`p~•~: ~.LrM ~0~ ~- -' 1 --- ~s-rT-ie =~sr v° ~ -- U - . " `'~ rf; ,~ ~-' ~ .,s.,' :~---_ ~- - a~~o - a sa ---~~ fib---~;~-~--a~"c- -----„-mac' ~ -~=,-F-*-+1--d---a~''~ F J1UI~lIw9 Nw.~ YG ~ ~V ~ , ~~~ ^ i ~ i ~ ~ ~• ; 11` _ f -_--- ,~ ~ -_ - --~-;---N-',-~2 ti`'~" --- _,~~~-; ~'- ,fief I ~k ~~Q .. _, ~ ..1 .Y ~ ~ - _ ~~~~ I ~ -e'er-„~'1 F""'~ '~~^ , ~' ~ ,'~„!.. 'err, --_ J~ ~ ~ ~ I~ W ~ ~~ f i ~ ~ ~ ~j II 1~ ~ N ~ ' ~' ¢ F / ' i .~ ~ , .- ~I °" ~ ~ ~ x ~ -" EXH IBIT B ~---~--~- '~ - y--~-~ - f D,~ & E - 5 ;~;, / , ~ ~~ls . w i' '~ ~ ~ L f~ I ~` r- -0N ~~ ® ~ Q ~ -a s < . ~ T: -- ~ ~ ~> Av vOM~41i g ~ ~ >: c ~ ~~~ ~~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ T ~• E~o~ $~~ R ~3 o, ag ~ ~ ~ ~ § ~ ~~ / ~~~ / ' -y--- ~~ ~~~ , ~- ,ti-- `~ a , ~ II ~ ~~ - ~~ Z « ~ ~~ ~- n ~ II } a Z ~ ~~ c i ~ "W ~ ~ ~~~~ ~ti ~ ~ ~ ~ r- -. N - ~ ~ ~~e I~', f I,~ ~ ~~ ,~~{ -0~ N - i~ N ~ ~- z Q r_ ~ I.n O z r~~ ~ a a P ~~~~ ~ ~~~ e ~~ a ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~~~~3~s~~4 ~ ~wF~eet~e ,~,~ . , I ; • • • • ,'w°"'•~ vas r 4 w +.n sw.aan auw ~ wu gg ! c~rAe vnn st+u'r~rn~ x~ .T, i~ ~ 9LDQYH'J 7Y01d3~N0~ ~d~ ~~ ~ ~SE ~ ~ ~ m ~ ~ ~a3~ ~~ t ~g ~~ i i 1 ~ w ! y - _ --~ .... ~ s n -IOIW A ]O _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - ~ _I _ _ _ - - f _ Y _ _ _ _ . ~ ~•Tl3.lS'M~ ,OI X3 _ _._ ___-rJe'.4'~ r I 3 it _' _ __ ~_- r HL - - - -- Via` - - - .~.zt~..~Zl ..~.~'. _, _ . ~~ _ ~~ ~ . ~= ' ~ '_ ~~ a sa ~----~-- i --- t nitvw __ _~££, _i d 1 ~-~ ~ ,~ fe i -• y\~ ~ ~~ _ , ' $' ~ ~'~ ~ • ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - s ~}"~ ' 1 ~ vI ~ ~/ 1 ~ I J ~`~ - i ~ Y ~ Q i tt ~- ; ------- ~ ~ ri _ ~ ~ to I 2 n `l y`~ ~'~p ~ Glv= L~ ~tq~ 4 ~ j ~Y N~ o,,~. - m~, o , .i ~ ~i ~~ie+rre~ee~- 1--- - - -- r p O ~nu~,u iaoa ~u~mmc G ~ i -- . ~~ ' +; N ~ J -t y z ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~ '~ ¢ f ~ , ~ ~ ~7 4 ~ ' - • v ~ f''~ .`~ ~~ ~ z NCH I B IT C ~ ~--- -------- --~ ~ - Q 1~~tn~~ ~ '~~ ----• ~~ r~ . u __~~ ~.. ~V ; ~ ,~ . ~..; n -~, Ni ?;w~~ ~ C nl yl ,, '~ ' :~ ~`'~~~ .~ ~~ •, m ~" ~1 ,~ .i S ,~ i It ,- ~-:~ = i~~ r j ~ 1 ~ ___ __.. _ -- I I ' . i N~ I i ~~ ~I 0.• _~ ~I~ ~I i~ ~~ _l.~ ~~ ~~ ~ i r ~ ~,- ~/ J~ ~ /r ~ i~ o~ ~~,-~ . I~ ~ `~-_ n ~ i ~1~ w ~~ ' iv / ~ ~~ ~ ,~ 7 ~,~_~_ - I~ ~~~_ 1V"; -~~' Z ~ I`ll 1 ~ ~ f~ ~ N cgs! r , ~ , ~e" --~ a ~ '' N Z^ LL E Q ~~ o-. . ~ O z ~__. I- ~~€~ gg~ ~~~ 3~ ~ Y~ ~~~e $~pgg~p~~ ~6~~68~ .1--- ~A _ .~ ~I .i~ ~s~ I~ I~ • - ~~ m s ~~ ~ ~ o~ 3 kg~ 0 6$ ~~ ~~~ ~~ ~~~ ~~~a~~~ ~~ ~e ~~~~~~ ~$ ~ ~~ _ ~ ~~ _ ~ E$ ~ ~` ~ ~ti .. ~,~~~ o ~~ : ti ~~o~ ~ ~~~ ~~ _ e . ~ ~I f i ~fwF3eee1 ~ ~ ~ ,~, ~ ~' i ,; CONSENT CALENDAR • DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 7 00 p m Tabe van der Zwagg August 14, 2007 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM18196 - FERRERA - A request to subdivide a property of 1 acre into three parcels in the Low (L) Residential District, located at 6970 East Avenue - APN 0227-121-34 Design Parameters The protect site is located on the west side of East Avenue and south of Victoria Street on a 1-acre parcel The parcel is generally rectangular in shape with overall dimensions of about 320 feet from east-to-west and about 135 feet from north-to-south The existing topography slopes gently from north-to-south The lots to the north, south, and east are zoned Low Residential and developed with single-family residences The lot to the west is zoned Low Residential and has been approved fora 6-lot subdivision (Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16578) and will be developed by the same applicant as the subtect site Anew cul-de-sac will be built to access both protects, with all lots taking access off of this new street The applicant proposes subdividing the site into three lots There is an existing house on the site that is proposed to be removed The lots meet all City development requirements except for lot average The required lot average in the Low Residential District is 15,000 square feet The proposed lot average is about 14,400 square feet The applicant has submitted a Variance request with the tustification being that without a Variance the lots would be much larger than the 6-lot subdivision to the west with which it shares the cul-de-sac. The approved lots to the west range in size from 13,513 square feet to 16,419 square feet Staff is contemplating including a condition of approval which states that the future home on Lot 1, which faces East Avenue, be developed with asingle-story home in order for the protect to be more compatible with the existing single-story homes adtacent to the protect Staff Comments. The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion Mayor Issues The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this protect The applicant is requesting a Variance to reduce the required average lot size of 15,000 square feet Secondary Issues The lots are not evenly sized (15,451, 15,412, and 12,354 square feet) Staff feels that this may make the development of the smaller lot more difficult The smaller lot, though, does meet all the minimum Development Code requirements Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Committee recommend approval of the proposed parcel map with the proposed changes to the lot size to the Planning Commission Design Review Committee Action Members Present Munoz, Stewart, Nicholson Staff Planner Tabe van der Zwagg • • EXHIBIT D °' ° ' • DRC ACTION AGENDA August 14, 2007 Page 2 The Committee recommended approval of the project with the provision that the applicant make Lots 2 and 3 more equal in size • D& E-8 08/02/2007 14:23 FA% t~oo3 keport of Neighborhood 1V1Geeting Geld on Tuesday, July 3~, 2007 • Day Creek Fsrk @ 6:00 p.m. RE: TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SCTBTPIVI18196 - FERRERA -- A request to su vi e a property of l acre into three (3) parcels in the Very Low (VL) Residential District located at 697U East Avenue; APN: OZ27-12I-34. Related filc variance DRC2006-00538. We had about 6-8 people show up with questions, concerns and requests. N'o one is opposed to the subdivision of current proposal listed abovc, They are more interested in the deveiapment of homes and $,sked mostly about future plans. Qtcestions: • Size of the lots? How many houses? • VJiII the sidewalk on East Avenue be continued? • What style of homes wi11 be developed? . Concerns: Concerned about the shape of the existing homes. They have been vandalized and kids have been spotted playing around. Requests.' • Request for easements to sewer from their private properties, ~ Request for more single story hannes. Plans to address concerns and requests: • We plan to have existing homes fenced and to post no trespassing signs. • We will take sewer connection requests into consideration if /when we arc able to build. We plan to have at least one single story home on lot one off of East Avenue. • EXHIBIT E osE.s , ~~ ~ E„rV(R~NMENTAL x INI~~~MATIQN ~OI~M (Part (-Initial Study) • Gry of Rsnano Cucamonga (Please type or priftt clearly using ink. Use the tab key to move frpm ons line to lire next lfne.) Plannfng Ofvlsfon (9d9j477-2760 The;purpose ofthis form is fio inform the City'of the basic campo~nents of the proposed prajectso'Eftiatthe City mayreWiew~the project purs~rantto City.Policies, ~Ordiraances,and Guidelines; the Ca'#ifornia •Environmental ~Qua~.#~Act; a~ncl •fhe r~~'~ ~~~~p~ ~~~ Procedures to Implement ~EQA. It .is important that the information requested in this application be provided an fwl1. ~ , Upon review of 'Ehe . cvirn;pleted ,In'r'tial 'Study ;Fart ~I a~rrd the de~reloprx~ertt,ap~Fication~, .addi,tiona! infi~rianation~su~c"h as, ~but~t~r~'t'~irrti'ted ta, tra'~f'~c', noise, ~biolrrgicat, drainage,and •~geo'lagicat reports rr~ay~be~~requir~d. The projec#~ppkication wail ttiatbe ~#eemed •ctimplete unless the identified special studieslreports ire swbm'~itted for review andaccepted as complete a~r~d aden~uate, The project appiica'tivn wiii,notabe sched~uied..for~CDm~riTttees' review unless ati required ~re~potis airs ~su~6naii~tted a~rid ,deemed ~cc>,n~p'iiete, for ~sfia#F to pr®pare the Ir«itiart ~Study,'Par# i1 ~a~s rec}uired by ~Cf"'QA. ,'in acfdation -to•rtlare ~~ling~'fse, thy; .ap~pl'fcan'~ wits •be res,ponsi•t+le to pay or ~r•Qirnb~irse ''the'~,Ci~ty, its agents, ~fficars, andlar .cnnsulfan#s fflr $.l~ costs far •the preparation; 'revp~ew; analysis, .recommeradatians, mitigations, etc,; cf•d:ny„special studie's or reports , ' , ~ ~ ; • • INCOMPLETE APPLICATIONS W1LL NOT BE PROCESSS'f7. Please note thatlf !s the responslb!!!ty of the applicant to ensuro that fhs application is complete at the time of submittal, Crty staff will not be available to perform work required to provide missing information. Application Number for the project to which this farm pertains- ~~~~~~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~~ Z~ ~ ' OU ~3 Project rtle ~~- ~~~~JISia.J Name & Address of project awnc~r(s)- 222 Z ~O 6 4" ~(6 ! ` ~~f l ~ # 2C~ ~ / h., ~4 l~b~fi4~'..4 l~-t- `~ ` l r Name & Address of developer pr project sponsor. ~ `~ EXHIBIT F Itlal Study F8rt1,docPar~e 1 of 14 D&E-10 P,ev, 3117/04 Contact Person ~, Address: ~~ ~~ ~"~G/~2~~-'~i' Name & Address of person preparing fhiS form (if different from above}: • Tel ephane Number.' Cal ~ ~ ~3 ' ~ ~ ~ ~ "7} Provide a fu11 sc21e (8-'l/2 ~ 77} copy Cf the USGS Quadrant Sheet(sJ which Includes the protect site, and indicate fhe site boundaries. 2) Provide a set of color photographs That show representative views into the s/te from the north, south, east, and west; yews rrRo and from the srte from fhe primary access pornts that serve fhe site; and representatrve views of significant features ro the site. Include a map showing Location of each photograph. 3) Projecf Location (describe} ~ ~~ ~-~- ~,~~ ~ ~ ~' 2 b 4) Assessor's Parca/ Numbers (attach add~tiona! sheet if neecessary}: ~ .~~ _ ~ 2 ~ _ 3 ca • *5) ~~rOSS Site Area (acJsq. ff.}: G~ aL ~ ~ ~ G~.~Z~ ~ sF "fit Net Stte Area (total site srze minus area of public streets & proposed dbdicatlons}: 7} Describe any proposed general plan am®ndment or zone change which would affect the protect site (attach addltlonat~et if necessary}: ,/t1 ~ • I~IPLANNING1FiNAL~FDRM5I000NTERUnltiei Study Pert1 docPage 2 of 10 Rev 3!17!04 D & E- 11 information indicated 6y an asterisk (*} is nat required of non-constrvct~on CUP's unless otherwise requested by staff, $) fnciude a descrfptian of all pe, s which wi!! be neces.~ary from the City of Ranc ;ucamonga and other governmental _ agencies in order to fully implement the project: t~Il LL____~1~ J`v,S~ yr~l i7 ~ 7~,E ~..G~'c~r f~ (~ ~C1~/~ I~ ~" Dr • / 5~ c~GD S~ ~, f3y ~ !4`~UC ~~ ~ ~>~~~ ~!~ o ~• /c~.'c7o0 sz, ~,-, Trf~S /S c ,4~5 ~ ~ 84- /~ ~~G~ 171. D i ~~~~a~` o r .G~ ,~1 ~~ ~~1~`r~~(C Q /~l ,~!`~.5~ i~z/~d ~1 r.~ ~ f~l~•C3tl f 77~' 9) Describe the physfCa! setting of the site as it exists before the project including information on topograph}; sort stability, p/ants and animals, mature trees, trails and roads, drainage courses, and scenic aspects. Describe arty existing structures on site (including age and condition) and the use of the structures. Attach photographs of slgnfricant featunss described. !n addlffon, cite al! sources ofinformatfon (l.e., geological and/orhydmlogic studies, bfotrc and archeological surveys, trsRlc studies): ~~ ,S17~ C~7'~~~5 ?~ ~~ ...Z A' C7 ~ f- ~l~ , j'R!M /~rL ;' ~L,. Ca/V Sp ~ ! ~ So / L P~-S~. 77'lE~~ A7~~ ~~~ ,.moo /9f'PI~.D~.~.l~-3d ' ~(~O SQ ~f r ~Y'o/~''d E,.~p f~i4~I /~ G~_ _/ f~~ ~7~` //4 !/~~Q 'TpFf/~/"7j~~~/L C.r ~~ ~~` p~F : ~ ~ L._/ ~T! b~ ~ Imo. ~IJ ~ frr ~~/ l` C~-r / f ! L~r / / y+~ r ~7~ ~ / !J ~ ~~ 1~~~/ " f'~-7'" b . ~"_ ,~C1L(l~/ f ~ (rt/~!'V' ~i I~~iJJ~~ l~ ~~ !~~-~~ ~UIJ~f I~f l~ Lt/~~ ' ~~~ /~lCx~`7- C~>~- ~I`~IGh/ .Sf ~i~C C~ L~~„_f~~t'~' ~f1~' /V~rfJ p~ fI,G ~ f~l° /ti't ~/~ ~ ~t/f~'f~. .l~l~~"//1~iQ C~,G l .5 ~ ~'S'7` /~'f/L~ 1~~1~ L~ u,MV~Si~. rJCT~~ b i~t~l=~c ~5 ~ ~ ~ ~5 i ~~r ~f~-~T ~~~ u .' ~ ~. h'D/~'?~~S D~ PAD Pct 7'"; -' ~°-~ ~/fr`C7 :, ~a ~/ %~~G t 10) Describe the known Cultural andlor historical aspects of the sfte. Grte all sources offrrfor»tation (honks, publlsf~ed reports and ors! history): • LIPLANNINGIFINALIFpRMSICOUNT~R1lnitial Sfudy Part1_docPage 3 of 10 Rev. 311714 D & E- 12 ? 7) bescribe any noise sources and their levels that crow affect the site (aircraft, roadw~., noise, etc.) and how they w111 effect proposed uses: ~. /G ~~r r~,~ ~rr~ moo! ~' ~ L~SS~~~' ~!ou.~ BSS r~-~ • fir= ~~, ;~ p~ .~~, r7- d~ ~~-~ r~c~'S ~ 7` ~'rt~~t:. r ry~ ~~,~FSI . S?~-N L~~9-i~-t~ ~ lvor ~.S /vo r4- ~ ~~~C 12) Describe the proposed project fn dQtail. This should provrde an adequate description of the site in farms of ultimate use ro osed 'act. 1ndiCate if theta are proposed phases far development, the extent of development to occur with each phase, and the anticipated camplet~on o eat tncrerrien . ae a ~ 1 e s i necessary: ~ ~ ~~ ~l 7c. ~1 ~. /ado saz~ ~~~ .~Sr~oo sQ ---T ) ~.~,~do ,~,~eox sc~~-- ;z ~ ~•L~ , ~r c' _~ ~ 1~~(~(J._ ~ _ ~~'T~ ~ ~~ S'~i'/~'l~ /`~~Oi~G SC~u7~f ,~ _ 3v.~ ~f Pf'pP`r~ ~ /~i~~c/ ~~c%~~o1'nfr~~ ~~n!~~ I iC t~~4 L K ~~'~ cl~t'R. j ft7U' 9 4) `~ !~v v~ ~ c/~CD P!s'~ ~' %S. r1. G. v~. _~ ~"k ~ L ~Q ,QT ] B~ D ~ ~ N,~ Fk~~r~4'fa ~ ,' S i~ ~ C~ !~./~/~ ~'7` /~'!/~, ~1~(~ ~v ! ~ ~, f-~-GU d rc/ PI~7° /~-o~;C~ rrl ~ r7 7~f' ~D 13) aescri6e the surrounding properties, including Jnformation on plarrts and animals 2nd any cultural, historical, ar ~n~ct aspects. Indicate the type of land use (residential, oorrrmercial, eft.), Intensity of lsatback, rear~aMf1e~ta.~ houses. shoos, departmenf stores, etc) and scale of development (height frontage, Y )' M //y T~ r~~ t.._ u./f L ~ Cc~ 1 C ~ D1~ .~ oc~ 7~` G; rv 1 ~( ~ P~ c/~c.or~ ..Y ~ lMll the proposed project change the pattern, state, or character of the surrourrding general area of the prdect? No ~;~pLANNINGIFINAL11=0RMS\C~UNTER11nl~ai Study Part1•doCPage 4 of 14 /V Rev 3117/04 D & E- 13 ~$) !r•,dlcate the type of short-terra end fang-term noise td be generated, including sou,..,: and amount How will these noise Jevels affect adjacent properties and on-sits uses? Wha! methpds of soundproofing are proposed /~O ]"" f7.~ r.1 ~ C.~/~l /l/(' / %vt /v1,~ I~r~J~ ~~ 5'TI9'7~D ~. ~ Cc91V5`7~U~77o% • D GV L C. ~ CrC. dLC/ "'~~~ ~ ~ ~ L.C~ ~' ~=;>~T ~ /~~ M~~,L ~Jr~-~iN ~ a/2 ~rSZx~f3~~l~G~ rS ,~x~~'Cr~~. "i6) lndlcats proposed removals and/or reptacamQnts Gf mature or scenic trees: 97) lndlcats any bodies of water (rncluding domestic water suppllesj into which t!~ arts drains; ~~~ ~Gdur~ PI~j~'~l /L/ / i/ ~ ,~ 7" ~-(/~ ~ /~- ~~J ~ ~L,f'°~C i7 B'1~/ ~f ~.~f/~/ 78) indicate expected amount of water usage. (See Attachment A for usage estimates). For further clarification, please contact the Cucamonga UaJi4y Water District at 987-259~- • a ResrdenHal {gal/day) a~ Peak use (gaUDay) ,p. Commercial/Ind. (gaUday/ac) Peak use (gal/min/ae) 99) Indicate proposed method of sewage disposal. ^ Septrc Tank Sewer. If septic tanks are proposed, attach pen;olafion tests. Jf discharge to a sanrtary sewage system Js proposed rndreate expected darJysewage generation: (see Attachmenf A for usage esfrmates). For further c~aNScefion, please oontact the Cucamonga Valley Water pistriCt at 987~259i. a. Rasldentral (gaUday) b. Comm~'cia!/lndustrra! (gal/day/ac) RESIp,ENTlAL ~'f?aJECTS. 20) Number of residential unrfs: .~ Detached (indicate range of parcel sues, minimum lot site and maximum lot srze; 3~ L cal 5S , o~ ~-~'7~5 /~`i ~=Bonn ~ ~x~n~ _ ~ ~~ r~~T7 d i2r pF Cam' 1~ 7~ ~ i r9Z/~ Afta_ched (indicate whether units are rents! or ~ sale units)' ~O~ J`~~~ ~ ~/'~ ~~ __ • __ 1:1i~(.ANNINGtFINALIFORMSICOUNTERIIrtitial Shady Partl.doCPage 5 bf 10 Rev ~/t7104 D & E- 14 21) Anticipated range of sale prices and/or rents: Sale Price{s) $,~~ipd~ to $ `~~rOO~` Rent {per month) $ to $ 22) SpecJfy number of bedrooms by unit type: ~ °-- ~ ~,~,~ ~-QC~/~ ff~/~9 ~~ 23) indicate anfrclpated household size by unit type: ~~~~~, ~~~~ ~ ~. / - / . ;" Y24) ~ Jndicdte the expected number of school children who w/tl be residing within the protect: Contact the appropriate School '`~J L7istricts as shown in Attachment B: a. elementary: Z b, Junior Hlgh: ~ c. Senor High „~ CQM'IVaERCiAL 1NDUSTRIA~. AND /NSTlTUT10NAL PRQJECTS 25) Describe type of use{s) ertd major function{s) of commercial, industrfef or fistitutionst uses: 26) Tota! floor area of cammereiat, industrfat, or institutfonal uses by type: 27) indicate hours of operation: 28) Number of employees: ' rotor: Maxrrnum Shift: Time of Maximum Shift: 1:1PLANNI-dGIF1NALtFbRJvIStCOUN'f•ERllnitlal Study Part? .daCPage B of 10 Rev. 3197144 • • • D&E-15 29J Prq~de breakdown of anticipated Jab Classifrcations, including wage and salary ranges, as well as an rndreatton ofthe rate of hire for each class/flcatlon (attach additional sheet if necessary) • 30J Estimalton of the number of workers to bs hired that currently reside in the City: "37) For commen^.rat and industrial uses only, indtcsfe the suurse, type, and amount of air pollution emissions. (Data should be verrfred through the South Coast Air Qualify Management Drstricf, at (818) 672-$283): ALL PRt~JECTS 32) Have the water, sewer, fire, and flood control agencres serving the prpjact been contacted to defenttine their sbilily to provfde adequate service to the proposed project? !f so, please indicate fhair response. 3$) In the known history of thrs property, ties (hens been any use, storage, or drschargQ of hazardous and/ar toxic materials examples of h~zardaus and/or toxic materials include, but are nqt limited to PCB's; radtoactrve substances; pesticides and herbicides; fuels, oils, solvents, and ofherffamrr-able lrquidsand gases Alsc note underground srorage ofany ofthe above. Please list the materials and describe their use, sforage, and/or discharge vn the property, as welt as the deter of use, it known. f~D r~ ~. L•1PLANNINGIFINALIFORM51CbUNTERllrn4al ~hxfy Part1 docP8g6 7 of 14 Rev. 3/17144 D & E-16 34) ~!l the proposed project ;nvotv~ , re temporary ar long-term use, storage, or discr._ ge ofhazardous and/ar toxic meter;ats, including but not 1;mRed fo those examples lasted above If yes, provide an inventory of alt such matpriais to be used and proposed metttad of disposal. The location o(such uses, Tong with the storage and shipment ar8as, she!! be show» and labeled on the appt;cat;on plans MI6 t hereby certify that the statements furnished above end in the attached exh;b;ls present the data and intnrmabon required for adequate evalusfiOn of th;s projsGt to the best of my ability, that the facts, statements, and Information presented are true and correct tot he best of my knowledge and belief. l further understand that addlt;onal /nfor/natiorkmay be required to bs submitted before an adequate evaluation can be made by the C;ty of Rancho Cucamonga. pate; / ' ,~ ~ ' v ` Signature. Title: • • I'1PLRNNINGIFINALIFORM5ICDUNTER1lnitla4 StuQy Part1.[3oGPage 8 Of 10 f7ev 3147104 D & E- 17 ATTACHMENT "A'• CITY OF RANCHO] CUCAIUIONGA • ESTIMATED WATER USE ANp SEINER FLAWS FOR NEW DEVELOPMENT (Data Provided by Cucamonga Valley Water Districf February zOD3) Water Usage Single-Family 705 gallons er d e~ r da~r Multi-Family 256 gallons per EDU per day Neighborhood Commercial General Commercial ~ffiee Professional Institutional/Government .~ • Industrial Park Large General Industrial Heavy Industrial (distribution) Sewer Flaws Single-Family Multi-Family General Commercial Office Professional industrial Park Lange General Industrial Heavy industrial (distribution) 1000 gallday/unit (tenant) 4082 gallday/unit (tenant} 973 gal/day/unit (tenant) 64'i 2 gal/day/unit (tenant) 1750 gal/day/unit (tenant) 2020 gal/day/unit (tenant) 1863 gal/day/unit (tenant) 270 gallons per EDU per day 190 gallons per EDU per day 1900 galldaylacre 1900 gallday/acre InstitutionallGavemrnent 3000 gal/daylacre 2020 gallday/acre 1863 gallday/acre ,Source: Cucamonga Valley Water District Engineering & Wafer Resources Departments, Urban Water Management Plan 2DOD I.IPLANNlNC~1~It+1AL1F~RMs~COUN7ER11nltl~i 5iudy Part1.dacPage 9 of 10 D & E- 18 Rev, 3117!04 A'TTACHIIlIENT B Contact the school district for your area for amount and payment of school fees; Elementary School Districts Alta Lorne 9350 Base Line Road, Suite F Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909? 987-0766 Central 10601 Church Street, Suite 112 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909) 989-6541 Cucamonga 8776 Archibald Avenue Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909) 987-8942 Etiwanda 6061 )vast Avenue P.O. Box 248 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91739 (909) 899-2451 High Schval ChafFey High School 211 West 5th Street antario, CA 91762 (909) 988-8511 11F~LANNINGIFINALIFORMSICOUNTEf2Unilia) Study Paril,docPage 10 of 10 ~{~v, 3~1 T/04 • • • D & E- 19 I ~~ ~t'try wF/ Ly_iJ '! ~..---~ y -~ r'' --°-'--~R- ~~ ..r'' ~ '~ (~ r i f ~ i ~ ., yr- r~ 4 - --s ~ ~ --._ _ ~~ = i F -~--' {T~_ ---III r~~~ ~•-' a /` ~-~-~ - ~ ^ - }/~~/ ~- ~l ~ f~ r~~ ~ ~ i -_ -~~- _ _ ~ ^_ _ _ ..'- - - r a ^ ^ i 1."V LJIYl~I 1 • f rf f ~i~~ jj ~ - `_ ~ij = --- 1x34 / ~~ ~~DS ~!~ _ 11 CI II PI P1 II _'. ...... ~ ~~~++ If II II ~ J.J31 r ~I J1 II Il r.~'3! II *~Iy • ^ i ~ ~` ~ ~ } . ; ^ i r t ~' ^ a ^ ,..~-} ~~ ~"'~.z- P v. ~... -- - L - - ~. .f i}}}111 r"If1 ^i` .w -. _ _ - -_ - ~ ri. ~' M ., !1l1f1l1llfl~r^"" f ISNt~f1~3 ~ IE' ~ rr---~ '~+;k ~ , ass. s: J I r 4 ~ ~ ~ -~-,~ r , ^~Fi'^dn#r - { ~~ ~ _ _ e- -~ ! i • ~, ~ 'k,k, 6 _ qq ^ ^ ^ ^ ~ / • s ^ r • I f • ^ i i F i • r y ""~+ i i • ~s" I~ ~=~'~ ~ ^ ~ i ^ i ^ ` ~ ,..~;} } `~~~ .~j~t~~ m E ~f~ ~ESr 'Cucamonga Peak, CA', Scale 1" = 0 2ooMi 322Mt 1,os6Ft, 1 Mi = 4999" , 1 cm = 127Mt R O J E CT SIT E D & E- 20 ~ ~ J ''ITY OF RANCHp CtlCAM ~ ®IV~q ~ V, JUN ~ ~ ~00~ ~ ~ ~~CE~®` ~'LANN j NG ~ ~ n ~~ at -~ -_ _ -- ~-._ ~~ ,... __~ 0 ~0~ ~~ ~i • -_-,~ ~`, `\ ~ D & E- 21 '1 1i 1, ~ f i; ri'.• ~ f i' ~~1{fl ~~ , .~ ~ ` ~ i ; ~~ ~, ~~ r Syr ~ ~ .. y~:r.i~~'r~ d~ i~t' ~ ~VS ' . ` ' ~ ° ~ - off . ~, , ~,~.~? f J~.1 C~ ~ ~ ~r4 4 i, ~, 7'" ~'.° " ~ ~ ~ ~ x ' ~, ~• _ ' <~ ~ s .! ily%r~7-cyt~~7~...fywX. :'w :.}W7' .~i~~ `!` '~.~j` 1i' '~ -ter„T titL' .1~~C.. iV. t. ~~ a`fF'~ F ~1K~`Iw lj ~j ~ ` _ _ _ -- y.,.b`~aYte`:It:Y~ `~1 .~~`1~i' ~7' 'h .. '"'~;ud l~.a.t. [~' ~ _ ~J+v+_ i <? ~%`e.~",'"•--. ms4C1'+aeF_~ .- r ~`9 '°h`S ^ .m ~'~n "~'^ g~^'?r I~ ~ ~ ~y,lrri',,.=.~.~.~;mr"udn`_~.*,~r1~",Rto~-`;:~~ .,Y~fi-~ v tel." ' ~,^ >- -ix'd ';_~ ICY---- w__, _ _.. ~~ ...h Y"_.~- ^_ ,4Zr~"i~9~tixT.i~$e'i~ ~M~_ 3'V=~ - _ 6 nr~~l~~'"~~ - y V ~ E- ZG ~~ `- `irh • ~, 'i 1 ~`v Y r * r ~ ~ , > ~7~ ~ _I ~~ ' I -;1,1 , d ~.~ _ .. , p , : ,~ ' - -' ~~~ ,( ,~ ,t, r r'• ~; ' ."I,J ~i' ~ jar r r~i I tip ` I Y ~.A! ~. ~ N?,' V ~ F~ ,~~~ 'tis •- .. ~ '', ~ ~: ! ~ i . ~M !~, a4 ~rr Yi,~n .`` yL~,1ff~`~i 'e, 71 C1~ i t s~, i ~, ~ (~;' ~% : a t, rte: ~C,~.'`~:~r ~ =~c,: Z~~~~,+1, ~F., 4~ q~ _. _ .i~ ~r f ~ Y. r .~ _~ n1, +IY~ _ J' ~~ ~I ~~i ai t _ ,_ ;SAC', :,r,- .' -.~;• , i }~ 'L 4,1r~ r.~4 d.,~ YD' ~P4i'. ,F _ ? N ' L ,~ ~,Y ~ ~ ~~ ~_k~7~ :~a~, l ~ ¢ ~' ti l~~~~~ h~ ':~ - :'kN' i t ~r-- ~1y ~.i R ~ ~i 1 I~ ~ ....+ e 4 -_, ~ y _ `` - , , n - .y y~' ~~ .Alt ~ Y ,.! l~ ~.. / Q!~ H _ _ ~` '-'r kCr~ ~ ... rl~~'J/1 ~,! Nr ' ~ y" ' ~Y ' ~ ~ ~ i ... 1 ` t ~ ~ 1 ~r~ `'ti ' ~ r rr.i rr ' p_ ~i ~ ~ ' o ~ t ~ ~.~, ,. I ~tJ~ .~ f~~. ~'~}. ~i ai'~ ~ ~n , it f~~ ~ r f~~ J ; 1 . ` ~r . _ ~~ y rx. d i D ~ E - 23 \ ~ r ~_-~__ :~ _~ y~ cT qt 3~J~ y l a x ~ < ~ _' { , . „ . "~^ _ -, 1'^= ~^`' 'COY rN ~ ~ . _F Y_ 1-~•~ . .y _ y _ ~.-- , ~ ~-~~ v' , .~ '~ ~,5. .. -~ -d y.J'~ - -- . €~_ _ 4 ~~ - (~~' f ~i ~~~~ ~1 _ - ~\~:~-_ - J~ • • D & E- 24 • City of Rancho Cucamonga ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM INITIAL STUDY PART I I 1. Project File: SUBTPM18196 2. Related Files: Variance DRC2006-00538 3. Description of Project: TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM18196 -FERRERA - A request to subdivide a property of 1 acre into three (3) parcels in the Low (L) Residential District located on the west side of East Avenue and south of Victoria Street at 6970 East Avenue -APN 0227-121-34 VARIANCE DRC2006-00538 -FERRERA - A request for a Variance to reduce the required lot area average from 15,000 square feet to approximately 14,400 square feet m coniunction with a proposal to subdivide a property of 1 acre into three (3) parcels in the Low (L) Residential District located at 6970 East Avenue -APN 0227-121-34 4. Project Sponsor's Name and Address: David Ferrera 2347 Pickens Canyon Drive La Cresentia, CA 91214 . 5. General Plan Designation: Low Residential 6. Zoning: Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) 7. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: The project site is located on the west side of East Avenue and south of Victoria Street on a 1 acre parcel The parcel is generally rectangular in shape with overall dimensions of about 320 feet from east-to-west and about 135 feet from north to south The existing topography slopes gently from north to south The lots to the north, south, and east are zoned Low Residential and developed with single-family residences The lot to the west is zoned Low Residential and has been approved fora 6 lot subdivision (SUBTT16578) and will be developed by the same applicant as the subject site Anew cul-de-sac will be built to access both projects, with all lots taking access off of this new street Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 9. Contact Person and Phone Number: Tabe van der Zwaag, Associate Planner (909) 477-2750 10. Other agencies whose approval is required (e.g., permits, financing approval, or participation agreement): • D & E- 25 Initial Study for SUBTPM18196 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 2 GLOSSARY -The following abbreviations are used in this report: • CVWD -Cucamonga Valley Water District EIR -Environmental Impact Report FEIR -Final Environmental Impact Report NPDES -National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System NOx -Nitrogen Oxides PM,o -Fine Particulate Matter RWQCB -Regional Water Quality Control Board SCAQMD -South Coast Air Quality Management District SW PPP -Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan URBEMIS7G -Urban Emissions Model 7G ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact," "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated," or "Less Than-Significant-Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages (x) Aesthetics (x) Agricultural Resources (x) Air Quality (x) Biological Resources (x) Cultural Resources (x) Geology & Soils ()Hazards & Waste Materials (x) Hydrology & Water Quality ()Land Use & Planning ()Mineral Resources (x) Noise ()Population & Housing ()Public Services ()Recreation () Transportation/Traffic ()Utilities & Service Systems ()Mandatory Findings of Significance DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation (x) I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect m this case because revisions in the project have been made by, or agreed to, by the project proponent A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared i \/ Prepared By ~,1/ ~`" ~ X Date f~'i~~c ~ Reviewed By -~ n -`~'~ ~,~~..ti'~..~1.11 Date ~ ~ ~ / ~7~'L~' • • Rev 3/13/07 D & E- 26 Initial Study for SUBTPM18196 • City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 3 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Su Ortln Information Sources Pp g Potentially Signdicant With Mmgation Than Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS 1. AESTHETICS. Would the project a) Have a substantial affect a scenic vistas () () () (/) b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but () () () (/) not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a State Scenic Highway c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or () () () (/) quality of the site and its surroundings d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare, () () (/) ( ) which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area Comments: a) There are no significant vistas within or adjacent to the project site The site is not within a view corridor according to General Plan Exhibit III-15 b) The project site contains no scenic resources and no historic buildings within a State Scenic Highway There are no State Scenic Highways within the City of Rancho Cucamonga c) The site is located on the west side of East Avenue and south of Victoria Street and is characterized by single-family residential development to the north, south, and west, with East Avenue to the east The visual quality of the area will not be degraded as a result of this project Design review is required prior to approval City standards require the developer to underground existing and new utility lines and facilities to minimize unsightly appearance of overhead utility lines and utility enclosures in accordance with Planning Commission Resolution No 87-96, unless exempted by said Resolution d) The protect would increase the number of street lights and security lighting used in the immediate vicinity The design and placement of light fixtures will be shown on-site plans which require review for consistency with City standards that requires shielding, diffusing, or indirect lighting to avoid glare Lighting will be selected and located to confine the area of illumination to within the project site The impact is not considered significant • 2 AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or () () (/) ( ) Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural uses b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a () () () (/) Williamson Act contract c) Involve other changes in the existing environment, () () () (/) which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural uses Rev 3/13/07 D & E- 27 Initial Study for SUBTPM18196 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 4 Less Than Signdicant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources Ph g Potentially SigniUcant With Mitigation Than Signdicant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Comments: • a) The site is not designated as Prime Farmlands Unique Farmland or Farmland of Statewide Importance The site is located on the west side of East Avenue and south of Victoria Street and is characterized by single-family residential development to the north, south, and west, with East Avenue to the east There are approximately 1,300 acres of Prime Farmlands, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance within the City of Rancho Cucamonga, of which about one-third is either developed or committed to development according to General Plan Table IV-2 The major concentrations of designated farmlands are located in the southern and eastern portions of our City that is characterized by existing and planned development Further, two-thirds of the designated farmlands parcels are small, ranging from 3 acres to 30 acres, and their economic viability is doubtful, therefore, they are not intended to be retained as farmland in the General Plan Land Use Plan The General Plan FEIR identified the conversion of farmlands to urban uses as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated b) There is no agriculturally zoned land within the City of Rancho Cucamonga There are no Williamson Act contracts within the City c) The site is located on the west side of East Avenue and south of Victoria Street and is characterized by single-family residential development to the north, south, and west, with . East Avenue to the east The nearest agricultural use, a grape vineyard, is less than 25 mile west of the project site The project site does not physically border the agricultural use and is presently occupied with a vacant single-family residence Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated 3. AIR QUALITY. Would the project a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the () () () (/) applicable air quality plan b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute () (/) () ( ) substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of () () () (/) any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-attainment under an applicable Federal or State ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions that exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant () (/) () ( ) concentrations e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial () () () (/) number of people Comments: a) As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 6), continued development will contribute to • the pollutant levels in the Rancho Cucamonga area, which already exceed Federal and State standards The General Plan FEIR identified the citywide increase in emissions as Rev 3/13/07 D & E- 28 Initial Study for SUBTPM18196 • City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 5 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially Signdicant with Mmgauon Than Signrficant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council The proposed project is consis en wi t e enera an or w is t e was prepare and impacts evaluated b) During the construction phases of development, on-site stationary sources, heavy-duty construction vehicles, construction worker vehicles, and energy use will generate emissions In addition, fugitive dust would also be generated during grading and construction activities While most of the dust would settle on or near the project site, smaller particles would remain in the atmosphere, increasing particle levels within the surrounding area Construction is an on-going industry in the Rancho Cucamonga area Construction workers and equipment work and operate at one development site until their tasks are complete They then transfer to a different site where the process begins again Therefore, the emissions associated with construction activities are not new to the Rancho Cucamonga area and would not violate an air quality standard or worsen the existing air quality in the region Nevertheless, fugitive dust and equipment emissions are required to be assessed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) on a project-specific basis Therefore, the following mitigation measures shall be implemented to reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels 1) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions. Contractor shall ensure that all • construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications. Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification. 2) Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, developer shall submit construction plans to City denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the project. Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning Staff. 3) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAGIMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high-volume, low-pressure spray. 4) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108 5) All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403. Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions: • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering. • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads. • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time. Rev 3/13/07 D & E- 29 Initial Study for SUBTPM18196 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 6 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources pp g Potentially Significant w~tn Miugauon Than Signdicant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods. • • Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices. • Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. • Suspend grading operations during high winds (i e., wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with Rule 403 requirements. • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means. 6) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWGICB]) daily to reduce PM,o emissions, in accordance with SCAC~MD Rule 403. 7) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAGIMD and RWGICB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PMio emissions. • 8) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel powered equipment where feasible. 9) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. After implementation of the preceding mitigation measures, short-term construction air quality emissions would remain significant as noted m the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 6) Based upon on the Urban Emissions Model 7 (URBEMIS7G) estimates in Table 5 6-4 of the General Plan FEIR, Nitrogen Oxides (Nox), Reactive Organic Gases (ROG), and Fine Particulate Matter (PM10) would exceed SCAQMD thresholds for significance, therefore, would all be cumulatively significant if they cannot be mitigated on a protect basis to a level less-than-significant The General Plan FEIR identified the citywide increase in emissions as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council In the long-term, development consistent with the General Plan would result in significant operational vehicle emissions based upon on the URBEMIS7G model estimates in Table 5 6-4 of the General Plan FEIR, therefore, would all be cumulatively significant if they cannot be mitigated on a project basis to a level less-than-significant The following mitigation measures shall be implemented 10) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate high-efficiency/low-polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters. • 11) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping. Rev 3/13/07 D & E- 30 Initial Study for SUBTPM18196 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 7 Less Than Sgndicant Less Issues and Su ortm Information Sources Ph g Potentially Signdicant With Mdigauon Than Signdicant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact After implementation of the preceding mitigation measures, the General Plan FEIR identified the citywide increase in operational emissions as a significant unavoidable a verse impac or w is a a emen o verri ing onsi era ions was u ima e y adopted by the City Council c) As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 6) continued development would contribute to the pollutant levels in the Rancho Cucamonga area, which already exceed Federal and State standards The General Plan FEIR identified the citywide increase in emissions as a significant and adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council The project proposed is consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated d) Sensitive receptors are defined as populations that are more susceptible to the effects of pollution than the population at large The SCAQMD identifies the following as sensitive receptors long-term health care facilities, rehabilitation centers, convalescent centers, retirement homes, residences, schools, playgrounds, child care centers, and athletic facilities According to the SCAQMD, projects have the potential -to create significant impacts if they are located within 1/4 mile of sensitive receptors and would emit toxic air contaminants identified in SCAQMD Rule 1401 The project site is located within 1/4 mile of a sensitive receptor Potential impacts to air quality are consistent with the Public Health and Safety Super-Element within the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan During • construction, there is the possibility of fugitive dust to be generated from grading the site The mitigation measures listed under b) above will reduce impact to less-than-significant levels e) Typically, the uses proposed do not create objectionable odors No adverse impacts are anticipated • 4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the pro/ect a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or () () () (/) through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U S Fish and Wildlife Service b) Have a substantial adverse effect on riparian habitat () () () (/) or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally () () () (/) protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means Rev 3/13/07 D & E-31 Initial Study for SUBTPM18196 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 8 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources ~ PP g I=o,en,~auy Signdicant With Mmgation Than Signrficant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native () () () (/) resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with es a is e na ive rest en or migra ory wi i e corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances () () () (/) protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat () () () (/) Conservation Plan, Natural Community conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or State habitat conservation plan Comments: a) The project site is located in an area developed with residential uses The site has been previously disrupted during construction of infrastructure and surrounding developments/annual discing for weed abatement According to the General Plan Exhibit IV-3, and Section 5 3 of the General Plan FEIR, the protect site is not within an area of sensitive biological resources, therefore, development will not adversely affect rare or endangered species of plants or animals because of the fact that the project is surrounded by urbanized land uses and is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Plan b) The project site is located in an urban area with no natural communities No riparian habitat exists on-site, meaning the project will not have any impacts c) No wetland habitat is present on-site As a result, project implementation would have no impact on these resources d) The majority of the surrounding area has been or is being developed, thereby disrupting any wildlife corridors that may have existed No adverse impacts are anticipated e) There are heritage trees on the project site that will be adversely affected by grading and construction of the proposed improvements An arborist's report was completed on September 10, 2007 (Randy Smith, Certified Arborist License #WC-0763) The report identified a total of 9 heritage trees on-site and concluded that the majority of trees on-site were in good condition The report recommends preserving those trees that do not conflict with the development of the site The following mitigation measures shall be implemented to reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels 1) Preserve or replace all heritage trees on the site. 2) Replacement shall be on aone-for-one basis with minimum 24-inch box size trees f) The project site is not located within a conservation area according to the General Plan, Open Space and Conservation Plan, Exhibit IV-4 No conflicts with habitat conservation plans will occur Rev 3/13/07 • D & E- 32 Initial Study for SUBTPM18196 • City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 9 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources. PP g FotenGally Srgn~icant wrtn Mr4ga5on Than Signficant No Im ac[ Incor rated Im ad Im ad 5. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project: significance of a historical resource as defined in § 15064 5~ b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the () (/) () ( ) significance of an archeological resource pursuant to § 15064 5~ c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological () (/) () ( ) resource or site or unique geologic feature d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred () () () (/) outside of formal cemetenes~ Comments: a) The project site has not been identified as a "Historic Resource" per the standards of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 2 24 (Historic Preservation) There will be no impact b) There are no known archaeological sites or resources recorded on the protect site, however, the Rancho Cucamonga area is known to have been inhabited by Native • Americans according to the General Plan FEIR (Section 511) Construction activity, particularly grading, soil excavation and compaction, could adversely affect or eliminate existing and potential archaeological resources The following mitigation measures shall be implemented 1) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will: • Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value. • Consider establishing provisions to require incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point. • Pursue educating the public about the archaeological heritage of the area. • Propose mitigation measures and recommend conditions of approval to eliminate adverse project effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, following appropriate CEQA guidelines. • Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the • project area. Submit one copy of the completed report with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. Rev 3/13/07 D&E-33 Initial Study for SUBTPM18196 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 10 Less Than Signdicant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources pp g Potentially Signrficant With Mrtigauon Than Sigrnhcant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact c) The General Plan FEIR (Section 5 11) indicates that the Rancho Cucamonga area is on an alluvial fan According to the San Bernardino County database, no paleontological • sphere-of-influence, including the protect site, however, the area has a high sensitivity rating for paleontological resources The older alluvium, which would have been deposited during the wetter climate that prevailed 10,000-100,000 years ago during the Late Pleistocene epoch of the Quaternary period, when the last "Ice Age" and the appearance of modern man occurred, may contain significant vertebrate fossils The protect site is underlain by Quaternary alluvium per General Plan Exhibit V-2, therefore, the following mitigation measures shall be implemented 2) If any paleontological resource (i.e. plant or animal fossils) are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified paleontologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i.e., paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate. Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures: • Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site • full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing activities. • Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage. If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find. • Prepare, identify, and curate all recovered fossils for documentation in the summary report and transfer to an appropriate depository (i.e., San Bernardino County Museum). • Submit summary report to City of Rancho Cucamonga. Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to San Bernardino County Museum. d) The proposed protect is in an area that has already been disturbed by development The protect site has already been disrupted by construction of infrastructure and surrounding developments/annual discing for weed abatement No known religious or sacred sites exist within the protect area No evidence is in place to suggest the protect site has been used for human burials The California Health and Safety Code (Section 7050 5) states that if human remains are discovered on-site, no further disturbance shall occur until the County Coroner has made a determination of origin and disposition pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 5097 98 As adherence to State regulations is required for all development, no mitigation is required in the unlikely event human remains are discovered on-site No adverse impacts are anticipated Rev 3/13/07 • D & E - 34 Initial Study for SUBTPM18196 • • City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 11 Less Than Signdicant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially Sgndicant wain Mmgation Than Sigrn6carn No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact 6. GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Would the pro/ect op e or s ruc ures o po en is su s an is adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as () () () (/) delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known faulty Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42 n) Strong seismic ground shakmg~ O O O (/) iii) Seismic-related ground failure, including () () () (/) liquefaction iv) Landslides O O O (/) b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoils () (/) () ( ) c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, () () () (/) or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table () () () (/) 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use () () () (/) of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater Comments: a) No known faults pass through the site and it is not in an Earthquake Fault Zone, nor is it m the Rancho Cucamonga City Special Study Zone along the Red Hill Fault, according to the General Plan Exhibit V-1, and Section 5 1 of the General Plan FEIR The Red Hill Fault passes within 3 miles northwest of the site, and the Cucamonga Fault Zone lies approximately 5 miles northerly of the site These faults are both capable of producing MW 6 0 to 7 0 earthquakes Aiso, the San Jacinto Fault, capable of producing up to MW 7 5 earthquakes is 12 miles easterly of the site and the San Andreas Fault, capable of producing up to MW 8 2 earthquakes, is 14 miles easterly of the site Each of these faults can produce strong groundshaking Adhering to the Uniform Building Code will ensure that geologic impacts are less-than-significant b) The proposed project will require the excavation, stockpiling, and/or movement of on-site soils The Rancho Cucamonga area is subject to strong Santa Ana wind conditions • during September to April, which generates blowing sand and dust, and creates erosion problems Construction activities may temporarily exacerbate the impacts of windblown sand, resulting in temporary problems of dust control, however, development of this project under the General Plan would help to reduce windblown sand impacts in the area Rev 3/13/07 D & E- 35 Initial Study for SUBTPM18196 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 12 Less Than Signrficarn Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources pp g Potentially Sigrnficant With Mmgauon Than Signdicant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact • as pavement, roads, buildings, and landscaping are established Therefore, the following fugitive dust mitigation measures shall be Implemented to reduce impacts to 1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PM,o emissions, in accordance with SCA(~MD Rule 403 or re-planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible. 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM,o emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM,o emissions from the site during such episodes. 4) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions. c) The General Plan FEIR (Section 5 1) Indicates that subsidence Is generally associated with large decreases or withdrawals of water from the aquifer The protect would not • withdraw water from the existing aquifer The site is not within a geotechnical hazardous area or other unstable geologic unit or soil type according to General Plan FEIR Figure 5 1-2 Soil types on-site consist of Tu~unga Loamy Sand association according to General Plan FEIR Exhibit 5 1-3 No adverse impacts are anticipated d) The maiority of Rancho Cucamonga, including the protect site, is located on alluvial soil deposits These types of soils are not considered to be expansive Soll types on-site consist of Tuiunga Loamy Sand association according to General Plan Exhibit V-3 and General Plan FEIR Exhibit 5 1-3 These soils are typically used for irrigated crops such as citrus and runoff is slow to very slow No adverse impacts are anticipated e) The project will connect to, and be served by, the existing local sewer system for wastewater disposal No septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal is proposed 7. HAZARDS AND WASTE MATERIALS. Would the pro/ect a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the () () () (/) environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the () () () (/) environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or () () () (/) acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within 1/4 mile of an existing or proposed school • Rev 3/13/07 D & E- 36 • • initial Study for SUBTPM18196 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 13 Less Than Sgndicant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources pp g Potentially SigrnUcant With Mitigation Than Sigrnficant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of () () () (/) hazardous materials sites com sled ursuant to Government Code Section 65962 5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment e) For a protect located within an airport land use plan or, () () () (/) where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the protect result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the protect area f) For a protect within the vicinity of a private airstrip, () () () (/) would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the protect area g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an () () () (/) adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of () () () (/) loss, infury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adfacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands~ Comments: a) The protect will not involve the transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials The City participates in a countywide interagency coalition that is considered a full service Hazardous Materials Division that is more comprehensive that any other in the state The City is in the process of developing an Emergency Operations Plan to meet State and Federal requirements The City has approved a Local Hazard Mitigation Plan which has received State and Federal approvals Compliance with Federal, State, and local regulations concerning the storage and handling of hazardous materials and/or waste will reduce the potential for significant impacts to a level less-than-significant No adverse impacts are expected b) The proposed protect does not include the use of hazardous materials or volatile fuels The City participates in a countywide interagency coalition that is considered a full service Hazardous Materials Division that is more comprehensive than any other in the state The City is in the process of developing an Emergency Operations Plan to meet State and Federal requirements The City has approved a Local Hazard Mitigation Plan which has received State and Federal approvals Compliance with Federal, State, and local regulations concerning the storage and handling of hazardous materials or volatile fuels will reduce the potential for significant impacts to a level less-than-significant No adverse impacts are anticipated c) There are schools located within 1/4 mile of the protect site The project site is located within 25 mile of the nearest existing or proposed school Typically, the uses proposed do not create obfectionable odors No adverse impacts are anticipated d) The proposed protect is not listed as a hazardous waste or substance materials site Recent site inspection did not reveal the presence of discarded drums or illegal dumping of hazardous materials No impact is anticipated Rev 3/13/07 D & E- 37 Initial Study for SUBTPM18196 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 14 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP g Potentially Signdicant With Mdigation Than Signrficant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact • e) The site is not located within an airport land use plan and is not within 2 miles of a public airport The protect site is located approximately 6 miles northerly of the Ontario Airport f) The nearest private airstrip, Cable Airport, is located approximately 2 1/2 miles to the west of the City's westerly limits No impact is anticipated g) The City's Multi-Hazard Disaster Plan, which is updated every two years, includes policies and procedures to be administered by the Rancho Cucamonga Flre District in the event of a disaster Because the project is required to comply with all applicable City codes, including local fire ordinances, no adverse impacts are anticipated h) Rancho Cucamonga faces the greatest ongoing threat from awind-driven fire in the Urban Wildland Interface area found in the northern part of the City according to the Fire District Strategic Plan 2000-2005, however, the proposed project site is not located within a high fire hazard area according to General Plan Exhibit V-7 8. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY. Would the project a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge () (/) () ( ) requirements b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere () () () (/) substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e g ,the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the () () () (/) site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner, which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the () () () (/) site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner, which would result in flooding on- or off-site e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed () () () (/) the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality () (/) () ( ) g) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as () () (j (/) mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation maps Rev 3/13/07 • • D & E- 38 Initial Study for SUBTPM18196 • City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 15 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources Ph g Potentially Signficant With Mitigation Than Sigroficant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact h) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures that would im ede or redirect flood flows () () () (/) i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of () () () (/) loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or damp ~) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudfiow~ () () () (/) Comments: a) Water and sewer service is provided by the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD) The project is designed to connect to existing water and sewer systems The State of California is authorized to administer various aspects of the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit under Section 402 of the Clean Water Act The General Construction Permit treats any construction activity over 1 acre as an industrial activity, requiring a permit under the State's General NPDES permit The State Water Resource Control Board (SWRCB) through the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWOCB), Santa Ana Region, administers these permits Construction activities covered under the State's General Construction permit include removal of vegetation, grading, excavating, or any other activity for new development or • significant redevelopment Prior to commencement of construction of a project, a discharger must submit a Notice of Intent (NOI) to obtain coverage under the General Permit The General permit requires all dischargers to comply with the following during construction activities, including site clearance and grading Develop and implement a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SW PPP) that would specify Best Management Practices (BMPs) that would prevent construction pollutants from contacting storm water and with the intent of keeping all products of erosion from moving off-site into receiving waters Eliminate or reduce non-storm water discharges to storm sewer systems and other waters of the nation Perform inspections of all BMPs Waste discharges include discharges of storm water and construction project discharges A construction project for new development or significant redevelopment requires a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit Construction project proponents are required to prepare a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SW PPP) To comply with the NPDES, the project construction contractor will be required to prepare a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SW PPP) during construction activities, and a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) for post-construction operational management of storm water runoff The applicant has submitted a WQMP, prepared by Julio Loza on October 24, 2006, that identifies Best Management Practices (BMPs) to minimize the amount of pollutants, such as eroded soils, entering the drainage system after construction Runoff from driveways, roads, and other impermeable surfaces must be controlled through an on-site drainage system BMPs include both structural and non- • structural control methods Structural controls used to manage storm water pollutant levels include detention basins, oil/grit separators, and porous pavement Non-structural controls focus on controlling pollutants at the source, generally through implementing erosion and sediment control plans, and various Business Plans that must be developed Rev 3/13/07 D & E- 39 Initial Study for SUBTPM18196 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 16 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources Pp g Potentially Significant With Mitigatwn Than Signdicant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact • by any businesses that store and use hazardous materials Practices, such as periodic parking lot sweeping can substantially reduce the amount of pollutants entering the storm ~-mrtrga4 storm water effluent Construction Activities 1) Prior to issuance of grading permits, the permit applicant shall submit to Building Official for approval, Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 2) An erosion control plan shall be prepared, included in grading plan, and implemented for the proposed project that identifies specific measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading. This erosion control plan shall include the following measures at a minimum: a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-site as a result of this project will be corrected through a • remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame. 3) During construction, temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff. 4) During construction, to remove pollutants, street cleaning will be performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site 5) Maximize canopy interception by planting trees and shrubs to maximize water retention and infiltration on the site. 6) Drain rooftops into adjacent landscape planters to minimize storm runoff from entering storm drains. 7) Drain impervious surfaces such as sidewalks, walkways, trails and patios into adjacent landscaping to minimize storm runoff from entering storm drains. 8) Provide an efficient irrigation system that includes the following• a) Rain-triggered shutoff devises to prevent irrigation after precipitation. b) Flow reducer or shutoff valves triggered by a pressure drop will be utilized to control water loss in the event of broken sprinkler heads or • lines. Rev 3/13/07 D & E - 40 • Initial Study for SUBTPM18196 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 17 Less Than Signficant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources pp g Potentially Significant With Mmgauon Than Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact c) Timers will be implemented to minimize runoff of excess irrigation water. d) Plants with similar water requirement will be grouped together to minimize excess irrigation water runoff. Post- Construction Operational 9) The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in the Water Quality Management Plan prepared by Julio Loza on October 24, 2006, to reduce pollutants after construction entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical 10) Landscaping plans shall include provisions for controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides. Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth. Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permits. ,. b) According to CVWD, 43 percent of the City's water is currently provided from ground water in the Cucamonga and Chmo Basins The CVWD has adopted a master plan that estimates demand needs until the year 2030 The proposed protect will not deplete groundwater supplies, nor will it interfere with recharge because it is not within an area designated as a recharge basin or spreading ground according to General Plan Exhibit IV-2 The development of the site will require the grading of the site and excavation, however, would not affect the existing aquifer, estimated to be about 288 to 470 feet below the ground surface As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 9), continued development citywide will increase water needs and is a significant impact, however, the CVWD has plans to meet this increased need through the construction of future water facilities c) The protect will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff because of the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on a site, however, the protect will not alter the course of any stream or river All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows The protect design includes landscaping of all non-hardscape areas to prevent erosion A grading and drainage plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits Therefore, the protect will not result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site The impact is not considered significant d) The protect will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff because of the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on a site, however, the protect will not after the course of any stream or river All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows A grading and drainage plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits Therefore, increase in runoff from the site will not result in flooding on- or off-site No impacts are anticipated Rev 3/13/07 D & E- 41 Initial Study for SUBTPM18196 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 18 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources pp g Potentially Significant w~tn Mdigation Than Signdicant No Impact Incorporated Impact Im act • e) The project will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff because of the amount of new building and hardscape which have been designed to handle the flows The protect will not result in substantial additional sources of polluted runoff A grading and drainage plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits Therefore, increase in runoff from the site will not result in flooding on- or off-site No impacts are anticipated f) Grading activities associated with the construction period could result in a temporary increase in the amount of suspended solids in surface flows during a concurrent storm event, thus resulting in surface water quality impacts The site is for new development or significant redevelopment, therefore, is required to comply with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) to minimize water pollution The following mitigation measures shall be implemented 11) Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Engineer for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), including a project description and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable. The WQMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004. 12) Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e., a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Building Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit. g) The project site is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Exhibit V-5 No adverse impacts are expected h) The proiect site is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Exhibit V-5 No adverse impacts are expected i) The Rancho Cucamonga area is flood protected by an extensive storm drain system designed to convey a 100-year storm event The system is substantially improved and provides an integrated approach for regional and local drainage flows This existing system includes several debris dams and levees north of the City, spreading grounds, concrete-lined channels, and underground storm drains as shown in General Plan Exhibit V-6. The protect site is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Exhibit V-5 No adverse impacts are expected ~) There are no oceans, lakes or reservoirs near the project site, therefore impacts from seiche and tsunami are not anticipated The Rancho Cucamonga area sits at the base of the steep eastern San Gabriel Mountains whose deep canyons were cut by mountain streams Numerous man-made controls have been constructed to reduce the mudflow Rev 3/13/07 • D & E- 42 Initial Study for SUBTPM18196 • City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 19 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially SigniUcant with Mmgation Than Sgnihcant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact impacts to the level of non-significance within the City This existing system includes several debris dams and levees north of the City, and spreading grounds both within and 9. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the pro/ect a) Physically divide an established community () () () (/) b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or () () () (/) regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to, a general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan () () () (/) or natural community conservation plan Comments: a) The site is located on the west side of East Avenue and south of Victoria Street and is characterized by single-family residential development to the north, south, and west, with East Avenue to the east This project will be of similar design and size to the surrounding • residential development to the north, south, east, and west The project will become a part of the larger community No adverse impacts are anticipated b) The project site land use designation is Low Residential in the Etiwanda Overlay District The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan and does not interfere with any policies for environmental protection As such, no impacts are anticipated c) The project site is not located within any habitat conservation or natural community plan area According to the General Plan Exhibit IV-3, and Section 5 3 of the General Plan FEIR, the project site is not within an area of sensitive biological resources, therefore, development will not adversely affect rare or endangered species of plants or animals because of the fact that the project is surrounded by urbanized land uses and is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Plan 10. MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the project a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral () () () (/) resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the State b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally important () () () (/) mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan Comments: a) The site is not designated as a State Aggregate Resources Area according to the City • General Plan, Figure IV-1 and Table IV-1, therefore, there is no impact b) The site is not designated by the General Plan, Figure IV-1 and Table IV-1, as a valuable mineral resource recovery site, therefore, there is no impact Rev 3/13/07 D & E- 43 Initial Study for SUBTPM18196 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 20 Less Than Signdicant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources pp g Potennally Signdicant w~tn MiLgation Than Sigrnficant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact 11. NOISE. Would the pro/ect result m excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive () () () (/) ground borne vibration or ground borne noise levels c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise () () () (/) levels in the protect vicinity above levels existing without the prolect~ d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in () (/) () ( ) ambient noise levels m the project vicinity above levels existing without the pro~ect~ e) For a protect located within an airport land use plan or, () () () (/) where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the protect expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, () () () (/) would the project expose people residing or working in the protect area to excessive noise levels Comments: a) The protect site is within an area of noise levels exceeding the City standard of 60dBA between 10 00 p m and 7 00 a m ,and exceeding the City standard of 65dBA between 7 00 a m and 10 00 p m ,according to General Plan Exhibit V-13 because of traffic noise from the I-15 and East Avenue An exterior acoustical analysis was performed on the site (Bridgenet International, September 7, 2007) and concluded that with the construction of a 5 5-foot high wall along East Avenue, the site would be in compliance with the City's exterior noise standards The City requires that all single-family residential development construct minimum 6-foot high property boundary walls This requirement is in excess to the wall height recommended in the acoustical analysis and no additional mediation is required The report also recommends that the acoustical analysis be updated at time of Plan Check for the future homes to verify that they will comply with the City's interior noise requirements The following measure is provided to mitigate the any interior noise impacts 1) Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit an updated acoustical study prepared by licensed acoustical engineer analyzing traffic noise impacts upon the project site and making recommendations for mitigation measures to reduce interior noise levels to below City standards. • • b) The uses associated with this type of project normally do not induce ground borne vibrations As such, no impacts are anticipated c) The primary source of ambient noise levels in Rancho Cucamonga is traffic The • proposed activities will not significantly increase traffic, hence are not anticipated to increase the ambient noise levels within the vicinity of the project Rev 3/13/07 D & E - 44 Initial Study for SUBTPM18196 • City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 21 Less Than Signrficant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources pp g Potentially Signdicant With Mnigauon Than Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact d) The General Plan FEIR (Section 5 7) indicates that during a construction phase, on-site stationary sources, heavy-duty construction vehicles, and construction equipment will noise excee ing i y s an ar s e o owing measures are prove ed to mitigate the short-term noise impacts 2) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. 3) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120-D, as measured at the property line. Developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120. Monitoring at other times may be required by the Building Official. Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building Official within 24 hours; however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building Official. If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted. 4) The perimeter block wall shall be constructed as early as possible in first • phase. The preceding mitigation measures will reduce the disturbance created by on-site construction equipment, however, do not address the potential impacts because of the transport of construction materials and debris The following mitigation measure shall then be required 5) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes. To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. e) The site is not located within an airport land use plan and is not within 2 miles of a public airport The site is located approximately 6 miles northerly of the Ontario Airport and is offset north of the flight path No impact is anticipated f) The nearest private airstrip, Cable Airport, is located approximately 2 1/2 miles to the west of the City's westerly limits No impact is anticipated • Rev 3/13/07 D & E- 45 Initial Study for SUBTPM18196 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 22 Less Than Signdicant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP g Potentially Significant With MiLgahon Than Signdicant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact 12. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the pro/ect directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure) b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, () () () (/) necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating () () () (/) the construction of replacement housing elsewhere Comments: a) The protect is located in a predominantly developed area and will not induce population growth Construction activities at the site will be short-term and will not attract new employees to the area No impacts are anticipated b) The protect site contains one single-family residence that will be demolished No adverse impact expected 13. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the project result in substantial adverse physical rmpacts associated with the provision of new or physrcally altered governmental facilities, need for new or physrcally altered governmental facrlrtres, the construction of which could cause significant environmental rmpacts, rn order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance ob/ectrves for any of the public services a) Fire protections O O O (/) b) Police protections () () () (/) c) Schools () () () (/) d) Parks () () () (/) e) Other public facilities () () () (/) Comments: a) The site located south of Victoria Avenue and west of East Avenue would be served by Fire Station 176, located on East Avenue approximately 1 2 mile from the project site The protect will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities Standard conditions of approval from the Uniform Building and Fire Codes will be placed on the protect so no impacts to fire services will occur No impacts are anticipated b) Rev 3/13/07 Additional police protection is not required as the addition of the protect will not change the pattern of uses within the surrounding area and will not have a substantial increase in property to be patrolled as the protect site is within an area that is regularly patrolled • • D & E- 46 Initial Study for SUBTPM18196 • City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 23 Less Than SigniUcant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP g Potentially Signrficant w~tn Mmgation Than Signdicant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact c) The Etiwanda School District and the Chaffey Joint Union High School District serve the project area Both school districts have been notified regarding the proposed eve opmen s an ar con i ion o approva wi require t e eve oper o pay t e school impact fees With this standard mitigation, impacts to the School Districts are not considered significant The project will be required to pay school fees as prescribed by State law prior to the issuance of building permits No impacts are anticipated d) The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga The nearest park is located 3/4 mile from the project site The project will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities A standard condition of approval will require the developer to pay park development fees No impacts ' are anticipated • e) The proposed project will utilize existing public facilities The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga The project will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities Cumulative development within Rancho Cucamonga will increase demand for library services According to the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 9 9), the projected increase in library space under the General Plan will not meet the projected demand The General Plan FEIR identified the cumulative impact on library services as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan for which the EIR was prepared and impacts evaluated Since the adoption of the General Plan, the City built a new library within the Victoria Gardens regional shopping center of approximately 22,000 square feet, which is in excess of the projected need of 15,500 square feet at build-out of the City 14. RECREATION. Would the project a) Increase the use of existing neighborhood and () () () (/) regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated b) Does the project include recreational facilities or () () () (/) require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities, which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment Comments: a) The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga The nearest park is located 3/4 mile from the project site This project is not proposing any new housing or large employment generator that would cause an increase in the use of parks or other recreational facilities A standard condition of approval will require the developer to pay park development fees No impacts are anticipated • b) See a) response above Rev 3/13/07 D & E- 47 Initial Study for SUBTPM18196 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 24 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources pP g Potentially Significant With Mitigation Than Significant No Im act Incorporated Impact Impact 15. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC. Would the pro/ect relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (I e , result In a substantial Increase In either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at Intersections) b) Exceed, either Individually or cumulatively, a level of () () () (/) service standard estabilshed by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways c) Result In a change In air traffic patterns, Including () () () (/) either an Increase In traffic levels or a change In location that results In substantial safety risks d) Substantially Increase hazards due to a design feature () () () (/) (e g , sharp curves or dangerous Intersections) or Incompatible uses (e g ,farm equipment) e) Result In Inadequate emergency access () () () (/) f) Result In Inadequate parking capacity () () () (/) g) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs () () () (/) supporting alternative transportation (e g , bus turnouts, bicycle racks) Comments: a) Implementation of the proposed project will generate 39 vehicle trips dally The proposed project Includes the development of three single-family homes The Rancho Cucamonga Traffic Model estimates that each single-family residence will generate 13 trips dally As noted In the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 5), continued development will contribute to the traffic load In the Rancho Cucamonga area The proposed project Is consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and Impacts evaluated The project Is In an area that Is mostly developed with street Improvements existing or Included In project design The project will not create a substantial Increase in the number of vehicle trips, traffic volume or congestion at Intersections The project site will be required to provide street Improvements (curb, gutter and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site per City roadway standards In addition, the City has estabilshed a Transportation Development fee that must be paid by the applicant prior to Issuance of building permits Fees are used to fund roadway Improvements necessary to support adequate traffic circulation No Impacts are anticipated • b) The Rancho Cucamonga Traffic Model estimates that each single-family residence will generate 1 two-way peak hour trip The proposed project Includes the development of 3single-family residences The Rancho Cucamonga Traffic Model estimates that each single-family residence well generate 1 two way peak hour trip In November 2004, San Bernardino County voters passed the Measure I extension which requires local jurisdictions to impose appropriate fees on development for their fair share toward • regional transportation Improvement projects On May 18, 2005, the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted a Comprehensive Transportation Fee Schedule updating these development Impact fees As a result, the San Bernardino County Congestion Rev 3/13/07 D & E - 48 Initial Study for SUBTPM18196 • City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 25 Less Than Sgndicant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources Ph g Potentially Signdicant With Mitigation Than Signdicant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Management Agency waived the Congestion Management Pian (CMP) Traffic Impact Analysis reporting requirement This protect will be required, as a condition of approval, to pay e a op e ranspo a ion eve opmen ee prior to issuance o ui ing permit The project is in an area that is mostly developed with all street improvements existing The project will not negatively impact the level of service standards on adjacent arterials The project will be required to provide street improvements (curb, gutter and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site No impacts are anticipated c) Located approximately 6 miles northerly of the Ontario Airport, the site is offset north of the flight path and will not change air traffic patterns No impacts are anticipated d) The protect is in an area that is mostly developed The protect will be required to provide street improvements (curb, gutter and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site The project design does not include any sharp curves or dangerous intersections or farming uses The protect will, therefore, not create a substantial increase in hazards because of a design feature No impacts are anticipated e) The protect will be designed to provide access for all emergency vehicles and will therefore not create an inadequate emergency access No impacts are anticipated f) The project design has adequate parking in compliance with standards of the Rancho • Cucamonga Development Code and will therefore not create an inadequate parking capacity No impacts are anticipated g) The project design includes, or the project will be conditioned to provide, features supporting transportation and vehicle trip reduction (e g ,bus bays, bicycle racks, carpool parking, etc ) 16. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the project a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the () () () (/) applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board b) Require or result in the construction of new water or () () () (/) wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects c) Require or result in the construction of new storm () () () (/) water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the () () () (/) project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment () () () (/) provider, which serves or may serve the project, that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's protected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments Rev 3/13/07 D & E- 49 Initial Study for SUBTPM18196 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 26 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP g Potentially Significant w~tn Mdigauon Than Sgndicant No Im act Incorporated Impact Im act f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste () () () (/) g) Comply with Federal, State, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste () () () (/) Comments: a) The proposed project is served by the Cucamonga Valley Water District sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga The project is required to meet the requirements of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board regarding wastewater No impacts are anticipated b) The proposed project is served by the Cucamonga Valley Water District sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga and RP-1 located within City of Ontario, neither of which are at capacity The project is required to meet the requirements of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board regarding wastewater No impacts are anticipated • c) All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows A grading and drainage plan must be approved by the Building Official • and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits The impact is not considered significant d) The project is served by the Cucamonga Valley Water District water system There is currently a sufficient water supply available to the City of Rancho Cucamonga to serve this project No impacts are anticipated e) The proposed protect is served by the Cucamonga Valley Water District sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga and RP-1 located within City of Ontario, neither of which are at capacity No impacts are anticipated f) Solid waste disposal will be provided by the current City contracted hauler who disposes the refuse at a permitted landfill with sufficient capacity to handle the City's solid waste disposal needs g) This project complies with Federal, State, and local statutes and regulations regarding solid waste The City of Rancho Cucamonga continues to implement waste reduction procedures consistent with AB 939 Therefore, no impacts are anticipated Rev 3/13/07 • D & E- 50 Initial Study for SUBTPM18196 ~~ I~_J • City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 27 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Su ortm Information Sources PP g Potentially Signficant w~tn Mitigation Than Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact 17. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the mayor periods of California history or prehistory b) Does the project have impacts that are individually () () () (/) limited, but cumulatively considerable ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future pro~ects)~ c) Does the project have environmental effects that will () () () (/) cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly Comments. a) The site is not located in an area of sensitive biological resources as identified on the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Exhibit IV-3 Additionally, the area surrounding the site is developed Based on previous development and street improvements, it is unlikely that any endangered or rare species would inhabit the site b) If the proposed project were approved, then the applicant would be required to develop the site in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan The 2001 General Pian was adopted along with the certification of a Program FEIR, Findings of Fact, and a Statement of Overriding Considerations for significant adverse environmental effects of build-out in the City and Sphere-of-Influence The City made findings that adoption of the General Plan would result in significant adverse effects to aggregate resources, prime farmland, air quality, the acoustical environment, library services, and aesthetics and visual resources Mitigation measures were adopted for each of these resources, however, they would not reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels As such, the City adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations balancing the benefits of development under the General Plan Update against the significant unavoidable adverse impacts (CEQA Guidelines Section 15092 and 15096(h)) These benefits include less overall traffic volumes by developing mixed-use projects that will be pedestrian friendly and conservation of valuable natural open space With these findings and the Statement of Overriding Considerations, no further discussion or evaluation of cumulative impacts is required c) Development of the site under the proposed land use change would not cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly The Initial Study identifies construction-related emissions of criteria pollutants as having a potentially significant impact Proposed mitigation measures would further reduce emission levels Additionally, impacts resulting from air quality would be short-term and would cease once Rev 3/13/07 D & E- 51 11/07/200"7 09: Z3 FAg Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga SUBTPM18196 Page 28 construction activities were completed. The Inlttal Study identified potentially significant impacts associated with the exposure of people to increased Heise levels. Mitigation measures contained in this Initial Study will ensure impacts are at less-than-significant levels. EARLIER ANALYSES Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR ar Negative Declaration per Section 15083(c)(3)(D). The effects identified above for this project were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in the following earlier document(s) pursuant to applicable legal standards, and such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. The following earlier analyses were utilized in completing this Initial Study and are available for review in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division offices, 10500 Civic Center [7rive (check all that apply): (X) General Plan FEIR (SCH#2000061027, Certlfled October 17, 2001) (X) Master Environmental Assessment for the 1989 General Plan Update (SCH #88020115, cert'rfied January 4, 1989) (X) Etiwanda Specific Plan EIR (SCM #82061801, certrfied July 6, 1983) (X) Exterior Noise Analysis (Bridgenet international, September 7, 2007) (X) Arborist Report (Randy Smith, certified September 1,0, 2007) (X) WQMP {Julio Loza, October 24, 2006) APPLICANT CERTIFICATION I certify that I am the applicant for the protect described In this Initial Study. I acknowledge that I gave read this initial Study and the proposed tigaticn measures. Further, I have revised the project plans or proposals and/or hereby agree to th posed mitigation measures to avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no s' ant environmental effects would occur. Applicant's Signature: Rrint Name and Title. Date: /l'~ ~ - a • • • Rev. 3/13/07 D & E- 52 J City of Rancho Cucamonga MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM Project File No.: Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM18196 and Variance DRC2006-00538 This Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP) has been prepared for use in implementing the mitigation measures identified in the *(Mitigated Negative Declaration for the above-listed project This program has been prepared in compliance with State law to ensure that adopted mitigation measures are implemented (Section 21081 6 of the Public Resources Code) Program Components -This MMP contains the following elements: 1 Conditions of approval that act as impact mitigation measures are recorded with the action and the procedure necessary to ensure compliance The mitigation measure conditions of approval are contained in the adopted Resolution of Approval for the project 2 A procedure of compliance and verification has been outlined for each action necessary This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported • 3 The MMP has been designed to provide focused, yet flexible guidelines As monitoring progresses, changes to compliance procedures may be necessary based upon recommendations by those responsible for the program Program Management -The MMP will be in place through all phases of the project The project planner, assigned by the City Planner, shall coordinate enforcement of the MMP. The project planner oversees the MMP and reviews the Reporting Forms to ensure they are filled out correctly and proper action is taken on each mitigation. Each City department shall ensure compliance of the conditions (mitigation) that relate to that department Procedures -The following steps will be followed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga 1 A fee covering all costs and expenses, including any consultants' fees, incurred by the City in performing monitoring or reporting programs shall be charged to the applicant 2 A MMP Reporting Form will be prepared for each potentially significant impact and its corresponding mitigation measure identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Checklist, attached hereto. This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported All monitoring and reporting documentation will be kept in the project file with the department having the original authority for processing the project Reports will be available from the City upon request at the following address City of Rancho Cucamonga -Lead Agency Planning Department 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 D & E - 53 Mitigation Monitoring Program SUBTPM18196 and DRC2006-00538 Page 2 • 3 Appropriate specialists will be retained if technical expertise beyond the City staff's is needed, as determined by the project planner or responsible City department, to monitor specific mitigation activities and provide appropriate written approvals to the project planner completion of each action item that was identified on the MMP Reporting Form After each measure is verified for compliance, no further action is required for the specific phase of development 5 All MMP Reporting Forms for an impact issue requiring no further monitoring will be signed off as completed by the project planner or responsible City department at the bottom of the MMP Reporting Form. 6 Unanticipated circumstances may arise requiring the refinement or addition of mitigation measures The project planner is responsible for approving any such refinements or additions An MMP Reporting Form will be completed by the project planner or responsible City department and a copy provided to the appropriate design, construction, or operational personnel. 7 The project planner or responsible City department has the authority to stop the work of construction contractors if compliance with any aspects of the MMP is not occurring after written notification has been issued The project planner or responsible City department also has the authority to hold certificates of occupancies if compliance with a mitigation measure attached hereto is not occurring The protect planner or responsible City department has the authority to • hold issuance of a business license until all mitigation measures are implemented 8 Any conditions (mitigation) that require monitoring after project completion shall be the responsibility of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division. The Division shall require the applicant to post any necessary funds (or other forms of guarantee) with the City These funds shall be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measure for the required period of time 9 In those instances requiring long-term project monitoring, the applicant shall provide the City with a plan for monitoring the mitigation activities at the project site and reporting the monitoring results to the City Said plan shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented The monitoring/reporting plan shall conform to the City's MMP and shall be approved by the Community Development Director or City Planner prior to the issuance of building permits • D & E - 54 • F... Q ~~~/~ v/ J Q H Z H J Y W U C~ _Z O I- Z CO G 0 Q H G = O R Q. ~ R Q o ~Q ~ = R 'w~ ' W vs ~ ~ ~ r a ~, m .a m ~ ~ z ~- m ~ _ ~ ~ 3 .i+ V N Q .r+ a` ~_ v N N N N N a U a a a to C fA C fA C fA C (~ C m m m m m ~. a a a n. • o 0 0 0 0 3 3 3 3 3 a~ -~ a~ -> a~ •s a~ -> a~ ~>- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ U U U m U • o m 0 0 0 0 0 a ~ a m m 'p ~ - 'II N N p C t6 C C +~ N ~ ~ N C lA ++ C ~ 0) Lj N '0 O f9 U O_ C ~' ~ (h LO d ~ ' N ~ Q - ~~ O fC j~~ N '" co C U N O N !A ~ (~f N f6 C Q -O N ~ ~ Q- C p N C~ ~ ` 7 T y ~ rp+ C O~ N O p ~ O C L O L L O Q U . U U O~ .II L O U U N Q N ~~~ y ~ ` y~ O fC O ~ Qc ~ O C U C ~. ~ ~~°'Q`~ C (Q ~. N .~~ ~ ~a ~o~~`~U G ~~ ~a~ o >+ O QU ~ ~ ~, ~ m ~ N ° b ' ~ ~ ~ ~ C p L O-~ d 0 ~ ~ E y ~ p~ C ~ ~ N -~ a~ ~ o? U , ~ ~ >~ ~ L U C O C ~- (n Q ~ (0 N 'D N O V) CC C_ ~. w- U y O N 7 ~ C C U O ~ O (A O N -p N O y N O L ~, C ,~ (4 U L C= ~- fQ (Q O O 0 N~ L O ~ .~. U U~ Q U " ~ + N L ~ O O U~ N ~ .... ~ C N (n C ~ N O O O C- ~ Q > U~ Q p U 0~ U N y 0 p N p U O ~~ ~~~ p o O 0 p QU L O - p ~ Q ~~ ~ d I L 3 ~ N p ~ ~ O N- N =~ y Q Q ~ ~~ ~ !A ~~ ~ CC (~ ~ O O C N y O p U U C U C 4 L N y ( N N ~ C ' O ~'' ~ L U O N¢ ( C U ~ ~ ~ N O "Q C O ~ fn " " ~ i C C~ O~ N U +N' C~ ~ ~ (n ~ 0 0 ' ~~ C U C~ U O p~ O p N CII U~ N C N~ O N N d. +~ O C +~ ~~ fC N~ `~ O C E: C~~ (6 7 07 (6 E N O ~ Q C C N U U~ fN N C C N . • ~. ~ O O- N~~ •~• (9 C~ ~ C? (4 N U N 7 `- a p O - ^. E O O Q O C N U E~ U ~ O N Q' > ~ > O N R ~ ~~ -a N N N C U E A U _- N N ~ Q Q~ L - p Q C -_ 7 U Q~ C D & E- 55 rn 0 N N N N ~ st ~ sf' ~ ~' ~i' • • a a a a Q Q Q Q Q Q a (A C (A C fR C (A C (A C N C fQ • Q (II O. (U Q R Q (C a. O O C O O O (II B. O O O O O U U V U V O ~ 3 3 3 ~ rn~ o~~ rn~ rn~ rn? 3 0 0 0 0 o c~ c y c v> c y c N ~ ' > a~ > a~ S a~ > a~ > a~ ~ c ~ O ~ c ~ O ~. c ~ o ~ c c O ~ c ~ O ~ a~ ~ ~ EC ~ ~ D v ~ v ~ U D v ~ v O' U U U U U U U U U U U w O O O O O O O O O O U m m m m m m m m m m a> m ~ '~ "- O a> m -c v '~- ~ O - L O N ~- a> O C ~ v c m c !A (II -O w C C C CQ N ` L L - (n ~ ~ ~ g ~"' O L to O 7 N O -O '~ (II r:+ 7 U 'O N C ,~, N C N ~ N p- (Q O N O C ~~ N N Q 7 N U N U IL ~ ._. O O L V D) ~ C O C f6 ' O rL.. ~ O Q' _ +' U N 7 O v-. .+ E r ~ C ~ U O d O ~ C~4 Q- O 'Q >' Q ¢ O N ri7 N ~ ~ ~ N ~ S N +. ~ ~ U 'O :a O ca ~ ~ ~ E d d U L ~ O .~ ~ ~ ~ O~ O~ Q N .~ 0 O N ~~ r N O ~ ~ ~ m U A n ~ a~ L N .~ to O ~ O C +~ [A .,r L L C C C yd), '~ y N CJ Cn ~ . N ~- N~ *'' N N N O (II O tV N 0 0 7 L C O O s> Q (~J L ' d C 00 ~' C OC m ~ N N ~ E ~ "O O fQ p (D O (Q ~ O" ~ N E '~ ~ L f6 C L ~ ~ .•~ ~ > - L O (Q ~ N E ~ C C ~ N .'.. ~ O fD ft7 ~ ~ t0 ~ ~ ~ > f4 d) C ~ ~ p C +~ N 7 fII ~ ~ .D ~ C 'O ' N O ~ O ~ p U~ O N~ *' O (6 X N ~. C " U U O p~ ~ C~ .~ N~ O ~ :r p p "p U .~ N ~ N ~ ( A - v 6 ~ N M E m O c tQ 7 > O ~ p O y o N p + 7 r W C 7 y a U ~~ U . N O ~ ' O) U 7> O U .r Q O U .«. N Q U (0 (II w.+ ~ C N O~ ~ C ~ r ~ f4 (p fl C ± O (a •y ~' d C X N E V y d "~ m N _ L N C O ~~ >, ~ N U R . ~~ rN+ ,,._ N~ 'O N~ C G C v L CO .C w L C U O d L N N d O ~ O N X 'II vp-~ O ~ ~ >+ C ca ~ ~~~ ~ E N N - C U fn N C ~ -_ CC In C C !n rn fl . cu f0 y ~ ~ N O a~ c 'D O is ~ ~ ~ ; N U L E ~ N -o m~ tC ~c n E ~ L~ .Z` o f0 ~ 'o L o o ~ d ~~ "" - L .~ ~ ~. O O O ~ N Q 'p N U d C O Q ~ p ~ N O~~ C a m y N U' C O N ~ +.' L fn W~ y ~ 7 ~ (n (n ~, fn .-. ~ N y O N~ O N O f0 ~ N O Y Q U ~ N rL-+ ~ N Q~ V C f0 O • r0+ C ~ ld m L U ~ N~ CII L~ U X O N +' _- R ~ ?~ T O E ~ A C ~ C II ~ y N N U " '' N E O cC ~~ a wca tna~3 0 3Q. cnn.:~Hv cn3cn ~L~n ova? ~ co id~ o a ~ O~ ~E O w L m ~- n~a L U~ as L+- ' F-- ~ L o • N • D&E-56 U • • . . ~ v v v ~o N N N N c'7 M M • ° ° ° a U U U a a a fA Vl c y (A m ~ O ~ O O m c a m a ~ a ~' a a a a. ~ d 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ ~ 3 3 ~ a ~ a i a i a i a i i a i i a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ U ~ ~ m U U U . • • O O O m m m m m ° ° ° m ° a "'' Y N~ L C D N 'Q L C L "". N- C A N ~ S O O L y C N N (Q O~ (O ~ ~p L O +-~ ?~ ~ r0r _ lQ ~ ~ U U ~ y O ~ Q C N ~ _ ~ N L ~. d~ W QL N N y N O N O N~ ~ i=' N ~ L N r-~ N y C~ ~ N ~ y 'O 7> O~ C Q) L p) O~ ++ L 0~ 7 ~ O O ~~ N L y~ i O~ O N +. ` y 0 ~ CQ "a'~' ~ V V~ (~j N _ C Oi `' L O N N~ C U .N y '~ O _ r-+ rr 3 y C O C O i +' C L p N O {~ C !/1 ~ '~ ~ (0 C y t~ fA y Q d i N C E~ N O ~ p fA V1 CB N 0 'O ~ (6 ~ U fC (C r`r O O (II ~ ~ ~ '-' O ~ Q) CQ U~ ~~ ~ N p L_ 0 ~ r ~ y a. 0 O U C N L N N O j C r O D) ~ r (II (Q ~ U L L ~ N a E N O E ~ "= C .`. O C O fQ ~ y ~ ~ ~ .' ~ f6 + ~ Q C C U O fC a. E ~ „ O CB LT ~ O Orr N L N y i O d p Tr- (4 "Q O i "O O _ ~ N U L U m~ to C N L (II U Q~ U L C O' U (Q ` y _ ~ p x L L Q~ O U~ y~ y L 0 0 0 O . C y O L 7 ~ ~ ~~ • C C N -p O- ~ C -p Q C V N - ~ N b1 .` d ~ (Q ` C..) ~ C L p fl. (6 ~ C6 O 'II ~ O +~ O_ fa ~ 'O i O U C L = U U O d ~ O O y O N ~ L O `O ~ "_r w y ,~ (C d C U f0 N U tII ~ ~ C Q O fA y •C N N O 'Y r -' L L 4 O~ ~ ; . O ~' O _ +.. N ~ ' 7 .r ~ L tC O r~ U . fC ++ L2 N N r.• ~ C O y _ r ... N -O N (n N r E C ~ ca ~ ~-' 0 fl O N y o u~ c° _~ c o Y ~ o a~ N o `a. o~$ Y °~ c a> ~ ~ o 0 ~ a~ ~ U ~ c o • U o .,5 y in m ai ~ •= C v> o a> a~ ~ L .~ ~ U ~ o ~~ m ~ >. c ~ a~ ~ o c~ C r= m m n. ? ~ W~ > o U ~ - ~ ~ ~ d O> o L O M D & E- 57 . . ~ v M M ~ ~' ~ ° ° ° ' a a a a a 0 0 0 0 0 Q ~ a a ~ ~ ~ a~ m • 0 0 w 0 w ° o ~ 3 ~ '~ 3 i a i a a i a i i a ai ai a'i > > ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ • U U U m p0 m . • • O m • ~ ~ D O O a a a a m c ~ jQ 'C y ca~~'c m oi~.~ >'rnc ai~ ~~ vL o~ ~ ~ ~`~- a> ~ ~' o.m ~C1 O W Qo ~ 3 ~ °' C . ~ c-.•,c_a~ c ova..... _D N + C ~ y ~ m z ~ '~ "C ~ ~-~U (II O ,~U E y oa ..+ . m' ° o o N c~ o a: ° N .~ ~ ~ a~ ~ ~ y m ~ ~ +' ° . c a a° a~ U ~ ~ o Q O M c m a cv .o ` , E N p `~ c° m o - T i -p ~ v ° ~. c m i a o v •o m E a c ` p ,~, m e Q `~ o°~ Q Q a~ ' ca ~° ~ i a rn w v~ a> ° ~ m n ~ ~. ~ c a n c ~ o ca ~ ~ ~ N ~ o = ~ o ui ~ .a; N- .~ c c a `' ° ~ ` c ° Q. ~ a co ~ ~ v °~ >+ °- o > ~ ' ~' v •~- m E ~° := ca ce m . p ca cv ~ app .°' N ~- ,Q ~' ~. N ~ ca ~ ~ , Z c ° o ~ ° ca °-' ~ E o ~ '~ ° c aci ~ m S ~ c ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ v ~ N .... ~ ~ .;_ ° cca c ~ ° c `~ a. cv ~ L O U N L N~ ~ fQ O °~ o C .a O Y 'p U f0 _ N y O O > ~ > O C ~ p _ L O O ,~, N~ V "'' "' L ..~ ~ ~ ~ _ C6 p, >. ~ Q c4 U ( +. ~.., ~ O d L (n L ~ y- N ~ O E f0~ ~ O N O > O_N 0_~O) 0 !/1 .,.. C N " ~: ~ i ~ ' _ - O + -+ 'O i L N N • C ~~ N c U ~-.. p N .*.. E L d~ 0 L L- C a N U O O (~ L ~ ~ ~ N L7 O d ~ ~' C L C _ +' > U = 0 4_ U tQ C O U~ O p O f6 O~ w, L -Q _+ -p ~ i O y c ""'' O L 7~ C~ O (C X 0 0° • ~ II. ~ ~ ~? _O N IIT. p C V C ~ O ~ ..N-~ > ~- O ° O N ~ O (Q ~ U N N ~ C ~ °~ ~ ~ '~ N v ~ ~ Q °- ° ~ c o c - o ~ o a~ n ° ~ .. o o wc~ ` ~ ~ ° c fII ° y o ° ~o~ <°cco~°~ ~ ~~ooN i c°a a co~c ~ ~ 'o o'v°'~ ~~ N o c ~ a~ o}, ~ ~ c ~ E ~ ~ o o N co ca o"~ cam a~ i -ova ~ ~ E? • p C N '= N y U~ L U L c Q n> ~- ~~ ~ C N C~ ~ 7 c O~ r=+ C~ c ` O ,~ ~ •_ d p) `- O O` ` ~ (/) O~ CQ W N O O O Q ?~ 'Q L. N C D N fn LT L Q N~ ++ L ~. C O O (/~ 0 7 U~ U . U N Q~ a C (Q ... ~ N L ~ O N (II to N O ~ ~ t6 ~ ~ ~ O - • a7 O ~ • C D & E- 58 • • . . M M ~ ~ ~ st N U ' o o Q Q Q Q a ~ ~ t/I O Q O a. C fQ `I d C O C O C O C O ~ ,~ w O ~ O U U U U O y > N Q) ? OIL OI~ Q) i N N ~~ S C N C N V C N L C~ > D U D U D U D U U ~ ~ U U U U m W U ~ m m m m ~ a U D O O O fQ ,~ ~ 'O N L N °_ N O 'O ~ "O C N C~ T- C N N w 'O C ~ p p (0 O ~' ~ ~ CO >i `~ U •'O U ~O U ~ U ~ ~ w ~ N ~ N ~ p ~ ~ U O U ~ U - ,~ ~ O O 7 N O L N ~ f A 0 d C (Q N ~ ~ ±+ fII O. N C N C B _ O E C ~ ~ ~ Q ~ ~ N U~ v- N ~ O O ~ ~ O Q V LO U ~ O y Q. U~ ~ L ~ O C U +O+ U ~ U _~ ~ N ~ .. d O) j, d O U Q ~- U N N >+ O C p L d C C ~ ~ ~- ~`~ C ~~~ ~ m t ~ O U ~ N CB C N B ~ O ~ O C N II. ~ N +`s C N N O O N + N ~ ~+'+ r CU O (0 N fn d N Q ~ O (O (a C CQ ~ °~ o 0 o v o n ._, o ~~ ~ °I aI '~ N Q o~ ~ aI ~ +. o 0 ° ~ ti °I ~ o ~° Q• ~ r >, > .c- ~ E ~ '° ~ ° ~ c rn ~ o aI a. N ' n r v ° L N °I N 'C M ~:_°. o~ N *'' U ` a ~~_~c N moo L O w_aI ~- O > ~ Snlw~al is ~ C C N U U C fa ~ ~ C O ` ~ ~ (II d .,. 2i ~ L' N ^. N -'+ -+ N N O O p (p 7 .ice ~ > "O •~•~ ~ C ~. N C 'O d ~ ~ O N~ C d N N w`, L rU. ~ N~ L O A N C O a+ ~ ~ ftf ,~ O~ C~ ~ ~ (0 Q 7 O O) +"C+ ~ ~ ffl >~ ~ y U f0 N > ~ ~ ~ - (Q O ~ ~ C 'O O C C C N C "~ O N ~ 0 _ ~ ~ N p C 0 0~ ~ y ~ ~p ~ 'O C ~ ~ N >, d fQ O C N ~ C Q ` O t ~ O N N~ N C N ~ ,, f4 ~ ~ N ~ C p N 7 ~ m ~ , fa ~ (6 C }, E (C N T C f0 N U O~~ Q ++ m N N C~ V O N "O f0 m 0~ ~ C ~ ~ .L2 O C O N Q 7 3 O ~ to B U 7 7 >~ += U C ~ f6 UU (II O) - O O) 7 f6 O ~ 0) N ~ C" U L~ U++ N O 7 d "O ~ O t!1 `~0 O C ~ "O (Q U ~ O (/~ U U ~ O ~ + .' ~ ~ N ? ~ L " 6 y C~ C N to OI ~ C O "O N uI ~ ~ C'1 ~ o_ ~ O ~ +~ ~ - .4: C j > X '~ O O CJ j N p f'- VI ~ ~ ~ ~ U~ O LL N N ~ U Q N U N r7 L ~~ U ~ c6 ~ >. = L d N U t0 ~ ~ L cc E Q ^ ^ + . 4-- 0 D & E- 59 . . v ~r ~ ~r v ~ N N N N N N a a a a a s N C N C N C N C N C N C ~p fQ f6 fII fC CC Q • a. a. ~ L1 w fl. r- ..... O w O r- O r- O O O ~ d d N d N ~ N N d d N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ (~ U U U U U pp m m m m m . . ~ ~ m W W W • p 0 0 0 U U U C V 'O Q) N Q) m T C 'D '~ (4 N C C L C C C Q y 0~ N O O ~ m N C C N O "O N C ~j ~ y N T N C "O R1 ~ H ~ ~ f6 „~ ~ ` U ~ ~ N ~ C ~ > N C N ~ Q "= r0+ ~ ~ Q) O V .C ~ ? C (0 ~ U w Q N C +N' N C ~ U N' -p 'O "" O C N U C C d (C N E N U~ '''' N O N ~~ ~ •(C lQ " - N N (n ~ +' N i O D d ~ C~~ N U _- ~ L y ~.. N 'O N N " C tom.. O ~ ~ (II C ~~ O t4 O. C i ~ N N X~ N ~ D R C N N j w C D C p 0 r C C tQ " Q O N N N . p, U ~ "p ~ N ~ L ~ p ~ ~ O ~ C N ~ ~ 3 + N yp.. C C ~ p O' R U + ' -NO N N C .~ N •f0 a. ` ~ O Q U '~' G U ~ 'O O ~ ~ O' L ~ N O >. C C C ~ ~ -p ~ o N ~ 5 ~ N oL a~ ~ 0 3 a~ u .a °- ~ a~ s ~ E ~ .fl ~~ E U- fl" N N Q U N~ ~` "O ~ N E 'II C O C C O ,«+ C U '-' O ~ p ~ L fQ (n !`~L d ~ ~ N N d ~ N ~ U ` CII N N O I > ~ O ~ ` ~ N O C +~ U N f tQ Q y N O C O _ O O C N~ O .«. O L O" N ~' ~ N ` •B d O C N N U~ f6 O Q) N N N C _ p fC N ` (a fa N a ~ U ~ SS. f4 7 yO+ O N ~ .. ++ O y O p U ~ O r + C ~ ~ r • w • ~ ~ p 'D Q. _E ~ ~ C N ~ ~ O N >+ C ~ C 7 "~' _ ~- O T ~ O C N C ~ ` d y-- •r+ _ f6 U C C~ C r-p. O E O N~ N C6 N ``'-- O~ C V N p O~ C U O Y N N O E ` N 7 0 0 o cu O ~ ~ W ~ cam" E m ~ a~ ~ 2~ ~-a c'ic n.~ p.a~ O`'Uco~~.car,~~~E c ~- ~•va~~ ~°.~o ~E ~v a~ic-o _. cc a4 • O ~ O N C~ O N Y 7 O L N N O N V ~ ~ " O U} 0 7 ~ ` U O-~ m Ca ~ NC ~ N ~ C 7 (Q N ... ~ ~- U O C ~ ,~? . O _ N O p C O 0 U N fC !n C ~- i O lC C L L ~ C L C~ C C N E •+O_. ~ ~ C ~ fa '~ U ~ N C N N C ~ N Q~~ O (Q W E f4 Q N "G O ~ N ~ ^ O "Q O N 7 = ^~ O 'D N ~ ,a? ~ N N ~ . ^ E ~ ~ O ^ b N . r .•• • 0 • D & E- 60 • • • . . v v v v N N N N • a a a a N C N C N C N C (p fII fQ fII n a. a n 0 0 w- 0 ~... 0 m ~ m ~ i a i a ai ai a>i a>i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ U U U U 00 m m m . . W W O W U U m U N L C O (Q C 0 "O d~ N f4 ~ N ' 7 ' ~ N Q) N 'II "a ~- O C N O C C O - S U N aO+ C 'p N T O r.+ N O C q) C O L + .,, ~ N >' N L O `~ O D_ O C - r $, C J fC O - 'O C (O •p L p ~ U N 7 N C L (C U .~ Rf C 'p N ~ U Y ~ ~ '~ ~ ~ L ~ ~- a> C ~ O 0) ~ O N- N ~ ~ c ~ C "'Q C C U N fl. o a> ~ c .,., N (Q N , C Q CQ C L- "Q a cam o a ;a ~ '~ o C o N ~ CQ . d ~ L O~ E 0 C p m . R ~ T > ~ ~ ' ~ ~ C C r . >. r + r O i f /1 > fII tt ~ ` O. O C C ~ '~"'' ~ ~ O L- E ~ ~ "~ 'Q O N N 'D C U ~ O Q ? ~ ~ ~ ~ Q • N L ~ N X .a+ O .C i n O r5 '', C C O O.. ~ a c ~-+ O :p to ~'' ~ w N f° O O U O U p t L E N ~ ` .... . N o~ ~ o~ ~ ~ ~ Nv ca o~ Lam'- c °~~ E"' - ac N ce.«.L ~.~ oa.a a~ vas ~ E ~~o~a~a;~E N N > ~ ~ ~ ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ O N p ~ ~ 'C ~ ~ ~ w d y ~ '~ !n "a m c ~ o.N c c ~ U ~ acid ~~ E ~ o ~ ~ ~ n~~ o N o ~ _~ ~ ~ L~ Q E O N o ~ N C ~. L C f0 O N C C C d) ~ E N U C E • w O p N N ~ N r j fII N .C N , - O- O N i ~ "6 CC C N N j .n C Q ~ ~ N ~ ~ D ~ ~ (II d t ~ C '~ ~' ~ ~ C d ,~ N ~ ~ ~ ,~ U ,~, L C N O .- = N O~ Y ~ >j C ~. (C E' E E O ~ U - G N C f , L N N N p N (~ E N 7 ~~ C "Q .n W ~. ~... N >' N C O w C C C N C~ N p U ~ ~ -Q .«.. f9 O ` Q ~- O L N O .II ~' ~ C ~ ` (Q (O C O II. L (Q r-~ r, N C O tII (C O L f`6 .C N N N r•+ Q) ' > ~ O ~` O~ N C~ ~~ O ~ •- L II. L U U ~ ~ = ~°_ (,) ~ r-. ~ ° f0 m N ~ ° N ~ N C C °'~ ~ .. ` N ` ~ O ,o-,,,, N .D _ (II L ~ p U U m ~ vF- a3c c ~~ ~ C 3 ~L fl C ~cv~~ a~ m ~ 3 aL c c O + N~ ~ ~ i 3> N N ~ p s N . - y y f0 L O C N N N U Q ` ~~ ~ p +-' C r• ~ L ~ ~ • ~ ~ ~ N O N N + r + -+ d O O j E p ~ N ~ p) C ~ C a O ~ U N ~ ~ O + -~ ~ ~ .C 3 ~ ~ O ~ N ~ ~_ X tC Q) O N ~ U ` ~ N O N ~ ~ N ~ O . N ~ 'G ++ N ±' 7 I - O .«_+ ~,, a t^ ~ U ~ d a.+ fn U ~ O ~ (B LL O. F- N ~ p n L ~ ~ U z ~ d w ^ ^ ^ ^ L p C O p F-- ~ O U E (C C f9 .~., O N O J ca J ~ N ~ L ~ N O 3~ N m N~ O ~ N C~ ~ ~ n_ C ~ 4- O ti D & E-61 . . v N a ~' ~' a U a a a a a N a c O c O c O o ,~ O V ~ U U N C y C N = ~ C ~ . ` ^ U OD U U U U . . m m d m U N >. C (Q +- C N ~' (B L ... rN+ N ~- ~ p fl- -~ C i O (II N O 0 "'' N O >, ~ C W d C~ T N N- C N ,~+ N C N .L-+ O C Y 'II .a lQ L > ~, > ~ N N (6 ""' . .. N (Q d O U N ~ C~ L ~ L N O. N N~ N d "~ '~ N i ~' _ p 0 L ._+ O p 0 p N d N U (0 N~ .Q C L U C fQ >. L f0 N N N O N U 0 Vr N f6 L~ U +-. N C N U V O N p Z C '= ~ ..+ +J (U T N "O N U~~~~~~ O E O M "''L U i r--. ~ ~ U >.(0.-. la .G p O p X O~ N.. OL,4;L ~> r-~ O N N ~ N (Q N_ O . ^ " ^ O" ~ U L L Q N d ~ ~ C -N- N C ~ (a 0- Q~ 0 7 U ++ (Q ~ O ~ C '~ -Q ~ ~ L N O O O ~ p ,, Q C r C Z *~' ^~ O ~ y E C y ., Y C ` > ~ U V E U p - L p N ,4; ~ Z CQ •~ cZa E~ ~ ~ a~ p O- i- ~ ~ o E o CC N n.a~ ~ Q . •+ fQ +. N N j'n X L L c ~' o^L'O c ~ ~ o N ~ ~ ~ N Z O N .Q .C ^. +~ N ~ U~ 7 L C O i +N., Q U U~ N~ ~"' Y C O N N +L-. +-' ~' fC N N~ ...+ C O U P N~ N N N C p r•+ rr O ` ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O p (0 f6 > > d O ~- N d a ~ L ~ L O ~ ~ N ~ N !~A ~ ~ U - p = E C N m ~ d O ~ fII (Q N C U •- ~ d 7 ~ ~ N .II . -+ O N r + d _ aW C 7 , > "Q N U U N N W Q ~~ ° s o ~ v> o ~tn ~ ~•N R ~ mO c ~ ~ o 0 o -~ o~ ~ ~ U U ~ `p~ Z p ~~ A N N O ~~~~ ~ O N t0 O N N O~~ C C v- U C C f6 O (II N ~ p i p O~ i> O > O C U D) ~ E LA ._ N ~ C ,~ O- ~ ~ O N U ~ ~ (B ~ L • O ~ O N m U ~ U '~' > ~ C ~ ~ N ~ N N 'C ~. O "O ~ ~+ f0 ~ "Q ~ C D) ~ N (Q C N -Q fQ N 'i p C L Y Q U +~ U~ O • ~ W~~ ~ O O U ~ O N W N 7 N V C~ C ~ C ~ ~ t'_" N ~O N m V~ '~' U U~~ C N C~ - CQ ~ O ~ O ~ L c'=' ~ C C • O- O ~ O = Z (O d W ~ N C -Q 0) N N N ~ y O n- fU p C ~ ~ C O Q L O N L~ >i N Q N fa L ~- N ~ p C C U ~ C U C N L C O ~ O~ O fB Q C ~, ~ O~ N U~ C O ~ O O O C N Q N E O" ~ O wL-+ L" O ~ ^ >+ L O O O rN~L,,, N N !n ~N" f4 0~ N ~ Q C ~ y C (II N C ~, m U o - O ~ ` U N O N~~ L L N ;~ N ,... N ~ "O "' ~~ ~ Q N ~ ~ C C N O R 7 L~ U D) 7 4=- C r 7 0 U +-' 7 p tII ~ ~. C O ~ O ' _ .. C U O ~ O Q L U C N ,~ C~ C N .~ N Q O ~ O~ p ~ O N N C~ ,~ ~" ~ p~ m 'a N "O N 'II N C C O j y V p O L C C S C N Q- N y -` Q *' N O N L N C O d fII >j ^ U~ O~ m U O Z 'C p U 0 N ~ N NL E L O O p U L cn O w0, ~ O O d p y d' +O+ r0. ~' ~ U N ^ C Cn ~~ N N~ N E N -C O H O_ • 4- O • • D & E- 62 • • r~ ~. • ~ C d' Q C O ~+ U ~ _ C: N ~~ C U U m ~ ~ d mv~~-aL~~o`o c ~ }, "o 'n o ~ ca c rn c ~ ~.Ymm C L p' O N O O O C6 C L]....r 'D O T C ~ C __ U N C .Q ~p ~ t6 (Q fd i C ~ ~ a-+ N (II L L N f0 (II N C B "~ N C Q N (Q O ~ O N r? II. i .rj. N U O O Q .L.+ N Y C >, N L ~ C N ~ O ~ N ~ j N ~ fR O~ O~ '«. 'Q C N y N C _ fC f6 ~ ~ O U O O O w ~ _ O _ (O M O B ~~' N C B L (O O C~ O C N ~ C ~ Q ~ C ~-.' C L >+ ^ ~ ~ ~ ~+ O C N N "O U pp O (Q ~ O ~ N a-. ~ "~ N 'a ~ N .i+ O~ O N 0 7~ 'O U C N 7 7 '~ ca N =L(nQ ~ U C:LL ~ N C .; V .~ .G a Y V S U O d Y a ~ a ~ a ~ ~ C rn C ~ ~ ~ 'D U U C m O C O 0 m ~ l0 ~O O1 C f0 U d ~. O O ~ 4- 'D N O N ~ O ~- ~ C~ U x ~ ~ ~- v v v `o p U O t t L f ~ o ~. .~ t r a m ~ _ ~ ~ ~ in ~ ~ Q N N ('7 ~Y to (O N C f0 d N N 'D 7 O ~ d 'C ~ C Q - ~ ~ ` ~ ~ ( ~ 0 ~ ~' p d . + ~ O U ~ fd ~ Y (n O C ~ j O N °~ Q U m ~ y ~ t C N d .f C O N ,+ O O a cn d ~ Q m U D c m v O C O ~ C d ~ O ~ ~ i~ N O C c U o ~ Z m o ~ Sf ~ U o a rn ~ m o L ~ c '~ W F- ~ U ~ L O ~ a c ~ a ~ C o 0 O ~ Q m U o w N N C rn N V O O U N ~ N C N C C N N ~ ~ ~ E a N ~ C m ~ m N N O > `O ~ ~ ~ C H o o m ~ ~ U v ov 0 m ~ v V .T. N ~i U ~ a a ~ D a ~ 7 ~ ~ f0 ~ N E c W ~ ~ U = O C w N U m 5 0 Q. ~ a U m a ~ d ~ p w 0 0 0 R~ U d U m a. u_ ~--- O D & E- 63 - City of Rancho Cucamonga MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION The following Mitigated Negative Declaration is being circulated for public review in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act Section 21091 and 21092 of the Public Resources Code. Project File No.: SUBTPM18196 and DRC2006-00538 Public Review Period Closes Project Name: October 24, 2007 Project Applicant: David Ferrera Project Location (also see attached map): Located on the west side of East Avenue and south of Vicforia Street at 6970 East Avenue - APN: 0227-121-34. Project Description: A request to subdivide a property of 1 acre into three (3) parcels in the Low (L) Residential District and a request for a Variance to reduce the required lot area average from 15,000 square feet to approximately 14,400 square feet FINDING This is to advise that the City of Rancho Cucamonga, acting as the lead agency, has conducted an Initial Study to determine if the project may have a significant effect on the environment and is proposing this Mitigated Negative Declaration based upon the following finding: • The Initial Study identified potentially significant effects but (1) Revisions in the project plans or proposals made or agreed to by the applicant before this proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration was released for public review would avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant effects would occur, and (2) There is no substantial evidence before the agency that the protect, as revised, may have a significant effect on the environment If adopted, the Mitigated Negative Declaration means that an Environmental Impact Report will not be required. The factual and analytical basis for this finding is included in the attached Initial Study. The project file and all related documents are available for review at the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department at 10500 Civic Center Drive (909) 477-2750 or Fax (909) 477- 2847. NOTICE The public is invited to comment on the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration during the review period. • October 24, 2007 Date of Determination Adopted By D&E-64 RESOLUTION NO 07-67 • A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM18196, A REQUEST TO SUBDIVIDE A PROPERTY OF 1 ACRE INTO THREE (3) PARCELS IN THE LOW (L) RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF EAST AVENUE AND SOUTH OF VICTORIA STREET AT -697-0-~ocT ovEnii i~ onin nno~inir- GiPJ-LEI-PdG-S-~-Pd-S~ ~~~noT T~COCnC ~v'c-rci~-v~~v~r-crci rv GITf ~~Tr~.7TTI-n7c~1 L V ~ APN 0227-121-34 A. Recitals. 1 David Ferrera filed an application for the approval of Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM18196, as described in the title of this Resolution Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Tentative Parcel Map request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 24th day of October 2007, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and continued subject item to the November 14, 2007, meeting and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. Ail legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred B Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of • the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows 1 This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing November 14, 2007, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows. a The application applies to a parcel that is generally rectangular in shape with overall dimensions of about 320 feet from east to west and about 132 feet from north to south, and b The existing topography slopes gently from north to south; and c The lots to the north, south, and east are zoned Low Residential and developed with single-family residences, and d. The applicant proposes subdividing the site into three lots, and e There is an existing house on the site that is proposed to be removed 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows • a The Tentative Parcel Map is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable specific plans, and D & E- 65 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 07-67 SUBTPM18196 -DAVID FERRERA November 14, 2007 • Page 2 b The design or improvements of the Tentative Parcel Map is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable specific plans, and The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed, and d The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable intury to humans and wildlife or their habitat, and e The Tentative Parcel Map is not likely to cause serious public health problems, and f The design of the Tentative Parcel Map will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the protect will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows a Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the protect Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the protect would have a significant effect on the environment Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, the City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration b The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration, and based on the whole record before it, finds. (i) that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA, and (ii) that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the protect will have a significant effect on the environment The Planning Commission further finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent Judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission Based on these findings, the Planning Commission hereby adopts the Mitigated Negative Declaration c The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the protect that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081 6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during protect implementation The Planning Commission therefore adopts the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the protect d The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring Program and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the Planning Commission's decision is based is the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 477-2750, Monday through Thursday from 7.00 a.m to 6 OOp m • D & E- 66 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 07-67 SUBTPM18196 -DAVID FERRERA • November 14, 2007 Page 3 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference 1) The Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions shall contain a provision that Lot 1 shall be limited to develop with asingle-story residence 2) A Tree Removal Permit is required for the removal of any non-fruit baring tree with a circumference of over 15-inches and/or height of over 15-feet 3) All perimeter walls shall be decorative masonry and have a uniform design that is compatible with those in the area 4) SubJect approval of Variance DRC2006-00538 and all applicable conditions Engmeenng Department 1) Development within Etiwanda/San Sevaine Area 8 is required to install master plan storm drains and interim basins Interim Basin No 5 and the storm drain in East Avenue were both constructed by Tract 15912, south of the subject tract Tentative Parcel Map 18196 can satisfy its condition to • install storm drains through the payment of fees However, those fees do not cover the interim basin. The developer of Tract 15912 is eligible to request reimbursement for the proportionate cost of the land and ultimate basin related facilities (outlet, etc) They must request said reimbursement within 6 months of the public storm drain facilities being accepted by the City. Therefore, this development will need to deposit $5,000 per gross acre in Tentative Parcel Map 18196 with the City for the purpose of reimbursing the developer of Tract 15912 If reimbursement is not requested within 6 months of public improvement acceptance, the deposit will be returned to developer of Tentative Parcel Map 18196 2) Reimburse adjacent developers for over sizing of interim drainage facilities 3) The developer shall make a good faith effort to negotiate with the owner of APN 0227-12136 an exchange of corner cutoffs dedications on East Avenue for sidewalk and curb returns on both corners 4) The developer shall make a good faith effort to negotiate with owner of APN 0227-121 36 regarding privately maintained landscaping and irrigation along their side yard on Street "A " Improvements are to be installed to the street curb Plans for these areas will be reviewed and approved by the Planning Department, with exception to street trees If the owner is not willing to negotiate said improvements, install rockscape on the parkway, per City Standards • 5) A Lot Line Adjustment for the excess 3 feet on Street "A" shall be approved and recorded prior to final map recordation D & E- 67 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 07-67 SUBTPM18196 -DAVID FERRERA November 14, 2007 • Page 4 6) Install private landscaping and irrigation system in the parkway of corner Lot 1 along East Avenue prior to public improvements being accepted by the City 8) The submitted Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) is substantially complete. At the time of development, submit the final WQMP and include the Best Management Practices (BMPs) identified in the WQMP on the grading plan submitted for plan check Environmental Mitigation Air Quality 1) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification 2) Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, the developer shall submit construction plans to City denoting the proposed schedule and projected • equipment use Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low-emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the project Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning Staff 3) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high-volume, low-pressure spray 4) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108. 5) All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403. Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads. • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods • • Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices D & E- 68 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 07-67 SUBTPM18196 -DAVID FERRERA . November 14, 2007 Page 5 Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is carried over to adjacent public thorough fares or occurs as a result of hauling. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction Suspend grading operations during high winds (i e , wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with Rule 403 requirements Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means 6) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWQCB]) daily to reduce Fine Particulate Matter (PM,o) emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. 7) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions 8) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel-powered equipment where feasible • 9) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. 10) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate high-efficiency/low-polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters. 11) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping. Biological Resources 1) Preserve or replace ali heritage trees on the site 2) Replacement shall be on aone-for-one basis with minimum 24-inch box size trees Cultural Resources 1) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will . Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunityforthe City to establish its archaeological value D & E- 69 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 07-67 SUBTPM18196 -DAVID FERRERA November 14, 2007 • Page 6 • Consider establishing provisions to require incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point • Pursue educating the public about the archaeological heritage of the area. • Propose mitigation measures and recommend conditions of approval to eliminate adverse project effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, following appropriate CEQA guidelines. • Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the project area Submit one copy of the completed report with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. 2) If any paleontological resource (i e. plant or animal fossils) are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified paleontologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i e ,paleontological monitoring) that maybe appropriate Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures • • Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing activities • Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage. If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find • Prepare, identify, and curate all recovered fossils for documentation in the summary report and transfer to an appropriate depository (i e., San Bernardino County Museum) • Submit summary report to City of Rancho Cucamonga Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to San Bernardino County Museum. Geology and Soils 1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAOMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWOCB) daily to reduce PMio emissions, in accordance with SCAOMD Rule 403 or re-planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible • D & E- 70 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 07-67 SUBTPM18196 -DAVID FERRERA • November 14, 2007 Page 7 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM,o emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction minimize PM,o emissions from the site during such episodes 4) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions. Hydrology and Water 1) Prior to issuance of grading permits, the permit applicant shall submit to Building Official for approval, Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SW PPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical 2) An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included in grading plan, and implemented for the proposed project that identifies specific measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time ground disturbing activities • are initiated through completion of grading. This Erosion Control Plan shall include the following measures at a minimum a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site ar off-site as a result of this project will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame 3) During construction, temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff 4) During construction, to remove pollutants, street cleaning will be performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site. 5) Maximize canopy interception by planting trees and shrubs to maximize water retention and infiltration on the site 6) Drain rooftops into adjacent landscape planters to minimize storm runoff from entering storm drains. 7) Drain impervious surfaces such as sidewalks, walkways, trails and patios into adjacent landscaping to minimize storm runoff from entering storm drains • 8) Provide an efficient irrigation system that includes the following a) Rain-triggered shutoff devises to prevent irrigation after precipitation. D & E- 71 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 07-67 SUBTPM18196 -DAVID FERRERA November 14, 2007 Page 8 . b) Flow reducer or shutoff valves triggered by a pressure drop will be utilized to control water loss in the event of broken sprinkler heads or lines c) Timers will be implemented to minimize runoff of excess irrioation water. d) Plants with similar water requirement will be grouped together to minimize excess irrigation water runoff Post- Construction Operational 9) The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in the Water Quality Management Plan prepared by Julio Loza on October 24, 2006, to reduce pollutants after construction entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical 10) Landscaping plans shall include provisions for controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permits • 11) Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Engineer for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), including a project description and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable The WQMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004 12) Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, the applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board Evidence that this has been obtained (i e , a copy of the W aste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Building Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit. Norse 1) Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit an updated acoustical study prepared by licensed acoustical engineer analyzing traffic noise impacts upon the project site and making recommendations for mitigation measures to reduce interior noise levels to below City standards D & E - 72 PLANNING COMMISS-ON RESOLUTION NO 07-67 SUBTPM18196 -DAVID FERRERA . November 14, 2007 Page 9 2) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8 00 p m and 6.30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday in Development Code Section 17.02 120-D, as measured at the property line. Developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17.02 120 Monitoring at other times may be required by the Building Official. Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building Official within 24 hours, however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building Official. If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted. 4) The perimeter block wall shall be constructed as early as possible in first phase 5) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 8'00 p.m. and 6 30 a m on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the • developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2007 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY Pam Stewart, Chairman ATTEST James R Troyer, AICP, Secretary I, James R Troyer, AICP, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning • Commission held on the 14th day of November 2007, by the following vote-to-wit D & E- 73 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 07-67 SUBTPM18196 -DAVID FERRERA November 14, 2007 • Page 10 AYES COMMISSIONERS NOES COMMISSIONERS ABSENT COMMISSIONERS ABSTAIN. COMMISSIONERS • • D & E- 74 RESOLUTION NO 07-68 • A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OFTHE CITYOF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING VARIANCE DRC2006-00538, A REQUEST TO REDUCE THE REQUIRED LOT AREA AVERAGE FROM 15,000 SQUARE FEET TO APPROXIMATELY 14,400 SQUARE FEET IN CONJUNCTION W ITH A PROPOSAL TO SUBDIVIDE A PROPERTY OF 1 ACRE LOCATED AT 6970 EAST AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN• 0227-121-34. A Recitals 1. David Ferrera filed an application forthe approval of Variance DRC2006-00538, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Variance request is referred to as "the application " 2 On the 14th day of November 2007, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3 All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred B Resolution • NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Rentals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above referenced public hearing November 14, 2007, including written and oral staff reports, togetherwith public testimony, this Commission hereby spenfically finds as follows. a The application applies to a parcel that is generally rectangular in shape with overall dimensions of about 320 feet from east to west and about 132 feet from north to south; and b. The existing topography slopes gently from north to south, and c. The lots to the north, south, and east are zoned Low Residential and developed with single-family residences, and d. The applicant proposes subdividing the site into three lots 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above referenced public hearing, and upon the spenfic findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows a That strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulations would . result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the obJectives of the Development Code In that, without a reduction in the lot area requirement, the applicant would have to subdivide the site into fewer lots that in turn would be much larger than the other lots with which it will share a new cul-de-sac, which would be inconsistent with the intent of the Development Code D & E- 75 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 07-68 DRC2006-00538 -DAVID FERRERA November 14, 2007 • Page 2 b That there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the property involved or to the intended use of the property that do not apply generally to other properties in the same district In that, the reduction in the required 15,000 square foot average lot area requirement by 600 square feet per lot will allow the applicant to create lots that are substantially similar in size and depth, width, and lot size requirements of the Low Residential District. c That strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would deprive the applicant of privileges entoyed by the owners of other properties in the same district. in that, without the reduction in the average lot area requirement, the site would have to be subdivided into lots that are larger in size and out of character to the lots in the surrounding neighborhood d That the granting of the variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same district In that, the applicant is requesting to subdivide the site into lots that are at a similar density to the other lots on the cul-de-sac and more recent subdivisions to the south and east. e. That the granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially incurious to properties or improvements in the vianity In that, the newly created lots will be indistinguishable from the surrounding lots other than being on average 600 square feet smaller in size than the 15,000 square foot lot average requirement 4 Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative • Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the protect will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows. a Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the protect. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the protect would have a significant effect on the environment Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared Thereafter, the City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration b The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration, and based on the whole record before it, finds (i) that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA, and (ii) that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the protect will have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission furtherfinds thatthe Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent tudgment and analysis of the Planning Commission Based on these findings, the Planning Commission hereby adopts the Mitigated Negative Declaration c The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the protect that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081 6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during protect implementation The Planning Commission therefore adopts the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the protect D & E- 76 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 07-68 DRC2006-00538 -DAVID FERRERA • November 14, 2007 Page 3 d The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring Program, and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the Planning Commission's decision is based is the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho (909) 477-2750, Monday through Thursday from 7.00 a m to 6 00 p m. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Planning Department 1) The Convenants, Conditions, and Restrictions for the Tentative Parcel Map will limit Lot 1 to be developed with asingle-story residence. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2007. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA • BY Pam Stewart, Chairman ATTEST James R Troyer, AICP, Secretary I, James R Troyer, AICP, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 14th day of November 2007, by the following vote-to-wit• AYES COMMISSIONERS NOES: COMMISSIONERS ABSENT COMMISSIONERS ABSTAIN COMMISSIONERS D & E- 77 _z ~ - ~~ ~' ~~~ PROJECT #: SUBTPM18196 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT SUBJECT: TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP APPLICANT: DAVID FERRERA LOCATION: 6970 EAST AVENUE - APN 0227-121-34 ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT, APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: General Requirements 1 The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, Its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or In the alternative, to relinquish such approval The applicant shall reimburse the Clty, Its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees maybe required by a court to pay as a result of such action The City may, at Its sole discretion, participate at Its own expense In the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition 2 Copses of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No 07-67 Standard Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size) The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect 3 The applicant shall be required to pay any applicable Fish and Game fees as shown below The project planner will confirm which fees apply to this project All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to the Planning Commission or Planning Director hearing a) Mitigated Negative Declaration - $ 1,850 X B. Time Limits This tentative tract map or tentative parcel map shall expire, unless extended by the Planning Commission, unless a complete final map is filed with the City Engineer within 3 years from the date of the approval -1- C 05 I \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2007 Res & Stf Rpt\SUBTPM18196 Stand Conds 10-24 doc Completion Date _/-~ -/-/- -/-/. -/_/. D & E- 78 Project No SUBTPM18196 Completion Date C. Site Development The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which Include site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, Development Code regulations and the Etiwanda Specific Plan 2 All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, use has commenced, whichever comes first on, or ap 3 Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the time of building permit issuance 4 Street names shall be submitted for Planning Director review and approval in accordance with the adopted Street Naming Policy prior to approval of the final map 5. All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for Planning Director and Clty Engineer review and approved prior to the issuance of building permits 6 Solar access easements shall be dedicated for the purpose of assuming that each lot or dwelling unit shall have the right to receive sunlight across adjacent lots or units for use of a solar energy system The easements may be contained in a Declaration of Restrictions for the subdivision which shall be recorded concurrently with the recordation of the final map or issuance of permits, whichever comes first The easements shall prohibit the casting of shadows by vegetation, structures, fixtures, or any other object, except for utility wires and similar objects, pursuant to Development Code Section 17 08 060-G-2 7 The developer shall submit a construction access plan and schedule for the development of all lots for Planning Director and City Engineer approval, including, but not limited to, public notice requirements, special street posting, phone listing for community concerns, hours of construction activity, dust control measures, and security fencing 8 SIx-foot decorative block walls shall be constructed along the project perimeter If a double wall condition would result, the developer shall make a good faith effort to work with the adjoining property owners to provide a single wall Developer shall notify, by mail, all contiguous property owner at least 30 days prior to the removal of any existing walls/ fences along the project's perimeter 9 Construct block walls between homes (I e ,along interior side and rear property Imes), rather than wood fencing for permanence, durability, and design consistency 10 Access gates to the rear yards shall be constructed from a material more durable than wood gates Acceptable materials include, but are not limited to, wrought iron and PVC 11 For residential development, return walls and corner side walls shall be decorative masonry -/-/ -/-/. -/-/. -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- • -/-/. -/-/- -/-/- -/-/. _/_/ I \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2007 Res & Stf Rpt\SUBTPM18196 Stand Conds 10-24 doc D & E- 79 Project No SUBTPM18196 12 On corner side yards, provide minimum 5-foot setback between walls/fences and sidewalk The 5-foot wall/fence setback and the parkway shall have landscape and Irrigation in addition to the • required street trees Detailed landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to issuance of building permits The parkway landscaping including trees, shrubs, ground covers and irrigation shall be maintained by the property owner The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the parkway maintenance requirement, in a standard format as determined by the Planning Director, prior to accepting a cash deposit on any property Completion Date -/_/ 1 A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, Including slope planting and model home landscaping in _/_/_ the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision 2 Existing trees required to be preserved In place shall be protected with a construction barrier In _/_/_ accordance with the Municipal Code Section 19 08 110, and so noted on the grading plans The location of those trees to be preserved in place and new locations for transplanted trees shall be shown on the detailed landscape plans The applicant shall follow all of the arborist's recommendations regarding preservation, transplanting, and trimming methods 3 All private slopes of 5 feet or more in vertical height and of 5 1 or greater slope, but less than 2 1 _/_/_ slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for erosion control Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy 4 All private slopes in excess of 5 feet, but less than 8 feet in vertical height and of 2 1 or greater _/_/_ slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as follows one 15-gallon or larger size tree per each 150 sq ft of slope area, 1-gallon or larger size • shrub per each 100 sq ft of slope area, and appropriate ground cover In addition, slope banks in excess of 8 feet in vertical height and 2 1 or greater slope shall also include one 5-gallon or larger size tree per each 250 sq ft of slope area Trees and shrubs shall be planted in staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy 5 For single-family residential development, all slope planting and Irrigation shall be continuously _/_/_ maintained in a healthy and thriving condition by the developer until each individual unit is sold and occupied by the buyer Prior to releasing occupancy for those units, an Inspection shall be conducted by the Planning Department to determine that they are in satisfactory condition 6 Front yard and corner side yard landscaping and irrigation shall be required per the Development _/_/_ Code This requirement shall be In addltlon to the required street trees and slope planting 7 Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on the _/_/_ perimeter of this project area shall be continuously maintained by the developer 8 All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment If located in public maintenance areas, the _/_/ design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Department _ 9 Tree maintenance criteria shall be developed and submitted for Planning Director review and _/_/_ approval prior to Issuance of building permits These criteria shall encourage the natural growth characteristics of the selected tree species • I \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2007 Res & Stf Rpt\SUBTPM18196 Stand Conds 10-24 doc D & E- 80 Project No SUBTPM18196 Completion Date E. Environmental 1 Noise levels shall be monitored after construction to verify the adequacy of the mitigation measures Noise levels shall be monitored by actual noise level readings taken on-and off-site A final acoustical report shall be submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to final occupancy release The final report shall also make recommendations as to additional mitigation measures to reduce noise levels to below City standards, such as, residential exterior noise levels to below 60 dBA and interior noise attenuation to below 45 dBA _/_/ irec or review an approva prior o e _ _ _ issuance of building permits The final report shall discuss the level of interior noise attenuation to below 45 CNEL, the building materials and construction techniques provided, and if appropriate, verify the adequacy of the mitigation measures The building plans will be checked for conformance with the mitigation measures contained in the final report 3 The applicant shall submit certification from an acoustical engineer that all recommendations of _/_/_ the acoustical report were implemented in construction, including measurements of interior and exterior noise levels to document compliance with City standards Certification shall be submitted to the Building & Safety Department prior to final occupancy release of the affected homes 4 Mitigation measures are required for the project The applicant is responsible for the cost of _/_/_ implementing said measures, including monitoring and reporting Applicant shall be required to post cash, letter of credit, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the Planning Director in the amount of $ 538 prior to the issuance of building permits, guaranteeing satisfactory performance and completion of ail mitigation measures These funds may be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measures Failure to complete all actions required by the approved environmental documents shall be considered grounds for forfeit 5 In those instances requiring long term monitoring (i e) beyond final certificate of occupancy), the _/_/_• applicant shall provide a written monitoring and reporting program to the Planning Director prior to issuance of building permits Said program shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented • 4 I \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2007 Res & Stf Rpt\SUBTPM18196 Stand Conds 10-24 doc D & E- 81 Protect No SUBTPM18196 Completion Date APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2710, ~OR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: OTE• ANY REVISIONS MAY VOID THESE REQUIREMENTS AND NECESSITATE ADDITIONAL REVIEW(S) F. General Requirements Submit flue complete sets of plans Including the following a Site/Plot Plan, -/-~ b Floor Plan, c Foundation Plan and reverse Foundation Plan (when applicable) d Ceiling, Roof, and Floor Framing Plan and reverse Ceiling, Roof and Floor Framing Plan (when applicable) e Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of the main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams, f Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams, water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning, and g Planning Department Project Number (I e , SUBTPM18196) clearly identified on the outside of all plans h Separate permits are required for fencing and/or walls 2 Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a soils report Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are required prior to plan check submittal • 3 Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers' Compensation coverage to the City prior to permit issuance 4 Developers wishing to participate in the Community Energy Efficiency Program (CEEP) can contact the Building and Safety Department staff for information and submittal requirements G. Site Development Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction All plans shall be marked with the project file number (I e , SUBTPM18196) The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted California Codes, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations In effect at the time of permit application Contact the Building and Safety Department for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts 2 Prior to Issuance of building permits for a new commercial or industrial development protect or mayor addition, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate Such fees may Include but are not limited to City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Check Fees, Construction and Demolition Diversion Program deposit and fees and School Fees Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Building and Safety Department prior to permits issuance 3 The Building and Safety Official shall provide the street addresses after tract/parcel map recordation and prior to issuance of building permits 4 Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m Monday through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays • 5 -/-/. -/-/. -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/ /_ I \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2007 Res & Stf Rpt\SUBTPM18196 Stand Conds 10-24 doc D & E- 82 Project No SUBTPM18196 H. New Structures 1 Provide compliance with the California Building Code (CBC) for property line clearances considering use, area, and fire-resistive construction 2 Provide compliance with the California Building Code for required occupancy separations 3 Roofing material shall be installed per the manufacturer's "high wind" instructions ng 1 Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with California Building Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved grading plan 2 A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work 3 A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the time of application for grading plan check 4 The final grading plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of building permits 5 A separate grading plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill The grading plan shall be prepared, stamped, and signed by a California registered Civil Engineer Note on title sheet that plans must be submitted for plan check and be approved prior to construction The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted California Codes, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application Contact the Building and Safety Division if you have any questions about the procedure at 909-477-2710 APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: J. Dedication and Vehicular Access 1 Rights-of-way and easements shall be dedicated to the City for all interior public streets, community trails, public paseos, public landscape areas, street trees, traffic signal encroachment and maintenance, and public drainage facilities as shown on the plans and/or tentative map Private easements for non-public facilities (cross-lot drainage, local feeder trails, etc) shall be reserved as shown on the plans and/or tentative map 2 Dedication shall be made of the following rights-of-way on the perimeter streets (measured from street centerline) 44 total feet on East Avenue 30 total feet on Street A 3 Corner property line cutoffs shall be dedicated per City Standards 4 All existing easements lying within future rights-of way shall bequilt-claimed or delineated on the final map 6 Completion Date _/-/_• / / / / / / / / / / / / / / /-/-• / / / / / / / / / / • I \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2007 Res & Stf Rpt\SUBTPM18196 Stand Conds 10-24 doc D & E- 83 Protect No SUBTPM18196 Completion Date • K. • • Notes (a) Median Island Includes landscaping and Irrigation on meter (b) Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check (c) If so marked, sidewalk shall be curvilinear per Standard 114 (d) If so marked, an In-lieu of construction fee shall be provided for this Item (e) If so marked signing and striping as required Improvement Plans and Construction a Street Improvement plans, Including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first Prior to any work being performed In public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office In addition to any other permits required I \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2007 Res & Stf Rpt\SUBTPM18196 Stand Conds 10-24 doc Easements for public sidewalks and/or street trees placed outside the public right-of-way shall be dedicated to the Clty The developer shall make a good faith effort to acquire the required off-site property Interests necessary to construct the required public Improvements, and If he/she should fall to do so, the developer shall, at least 120 days prior to submittal of the final map for approval, enter Into an agreement to complete the Improvements pursuant to Government Code Sections 66462 and 66462 5 at such time as the Clty decides to acquire the property Interests required for the Improvements Such agreement shall provide for payment by the developer of all costs Incurred by the City if the City decides to acquire the off-site property Interests required in connection with Ivi Ion ecuri y or a po Ion o ese cos s s a e in t e orm o a cas eposit In the amount given In an appraisal report obtained by the Clty, at developer's cost The appraiser shall have been approved by the Clty prior to commencement of the appraisal This condition applies in particular, but not limited to Street A Street Improvements 1 All public improvements (Interior streets, drainage facilities, communitytraiis, paseos, landscaped areas, etc) shown on the plans and/or tentative map shall be constructed to City Standards Interior street improvements shall Include, but are not limited to, curb and gutter, AC pavement, drive approaches, sidewalks, street lights, and street trees 2 Pursuant to City Council Resolution No 88-557, no person shall make connections from a source of energy, fuel or power to any building service equipment which is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit Is required unless, In addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Council, except that In developments containing more than one building or unit, the development may have energy connections made to a percentage of those buildings, or units proportionate to the completion of improvements as required by conditions of approval of development In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings or units be connected to energy prior to completion and acceptance of all Improvements required by these conditions of approval of development 3 Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to Street Name Curb & Gutter A.C Pvmt Side- walk Drive Appr Street Lights Street Trees Comm Trail Median Island Bike Trail Other East Avenue X X X X X X e Street A X X X X X X e _/-/. _/_/. _/-/. -/-/- -/-/. -/-/- -/-/- D & E - 84 Project No SUBTPM18196 c Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name slgning, traffic signal conduit, and interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer d Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction project along mayor or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer e Handicapped access ramps shall be installed on all corners of intersections per City Standards or as directed by the City Engineer Completion Date -/-/. -~-~ -~-~- Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction Street or lane closure permits are required A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in accordance with the City's street tree program Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows The completed legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on sheet_(typically sheet 1) " Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans The City Engineer reserves the right to adjust tree species based upon field conditions and other variables For additional information, contact the Project Engineer MIN GROW STREET NAME BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SPACE SPACING SIZE OTY EAST AVENUE Eucalyptus Red Gum 8' 30' O C 5 Gal Fill FOREGROUND camaldu7lenis In TREE SPECIFIC PLAN DICTATES SPECIES DESPITE PARKWAY WIDTH BACKGROUND Gegera parviflora Australian Willow 5' 20' O C 15 Gal TREE IN LARGER PLANTERS PROVIDE SELECT APPORIATE TREE FROM THE APROVED STREET TREE LIST FOR STREET NAME RANCHO CUCAMONGA LIST EACH STREET AS A SEPARATE LINE ITEM WITHIN THIS LEGEND Construction Notes for Street Trees 1) All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the Clty inspector Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill soil amendments, as determined by the City inspector 3) All street trees are subject to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Department 4) Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only Intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with adopted policy On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all project intersections, including driveways Local residential street intersections and commercial or industrial driveways may have lines of sight plotted as required / / -~-~. -~-~- -/_/ • 8 I \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2007 Res & Stf Rpt\SUBTPM18196 Stand Conds 10-24 doc D & E- 85 Protect No SUBTPM18196 Completion Date L. Public Maintenance Areas • 1 A signed consent and waiver form to loin and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting _/_/ Districts shall be filed with the City Engineer prior to final map approval or Issuance of building permits whichever occurs first Formation costs shall be borne by the developer M. Drainage and Flood Control A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approval or the Issuance of buudmg permits, be Installed as required by the City Engineer roved by the City Engineer prior to final r giver occurs first All drainage facilities s 2 Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surface drainage entering the property from adjacent areas 3 Trees are prohibited within 5 feet of the outside diameter of any public storm drain pipe measured from the outer edge of a mature tree trunk N. Improvement Completion If the required public Improvements are not completed prior to approval of the final parcel map, an Improvement security accompanied by an agreement executed by the Developer and the City will be required for Final Parcel Map SUBTPM18196 O. Utilities 1 Provide separate utility services to each parcel Including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility • Standards Easements shall be provided as required 2 The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary 3 Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVW D), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino A letter of compliance from the CVW D is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential protects 4 Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies Involved Approval of the final parcel map will be subject to any requirements that may be received from them P. General Requirements and Approvals Etiwanda/San Sevaine Area Regional Mainline, Secondary Regional, and Master Plan Drainage Fees shall be paid prior to final map approval or prior to building permit Issuance if no map is involved A non-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all new streetlights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to building permit issuance if no map is involved • I \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2007 Res & Stf Rpt\SUBTPM18196 Stand Conds 10-24 doc -/-/- -/-/- -/_/. _/_/ -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/-~ _/_/ D & E- 86 Protect No SUBTPM18196 Completion Date 3 Prior to approval of the final map, or prior to improvement agreement approval If no map is involved, all Tract Maps, Parcel Maps and public Improvement plans shall be submitted to the Engineering Division on a compact disc (CD) in Auto CAD (computer aided design) format If public Improvement plans are completed after map approval, the CD shall be submitted prior to issuance of a construction permit for frontage Improvements or a building permit, whichever occurs first APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DEPARTMENT, FIRE PROTECTION PLANNING SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING ,7 SEE ATTACHED 10 • I \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2007 Res & Stf Rpt\SUBTPM18196 Stand Conds 10-24 doc D & E- 87 • Fire Construction Services STANDARD CONDITIONS Date of Review Project Name Project Address Project Number ~_~.~.~ Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District District July 17, 2007 David Ferrera 6970 East SUBTPM18196 THE FOLLOWING STANDARD CONDITIONS APPLY TO THIS PROJECT. FSC-1 Public and Private Water Supply 1 Design guidelines for Fire Hydrants: The following provides design guidelines for the spacing and location of fire hydrants a The maximum distance between fire hydrants in single-family residential projects is 500-feet No portion of the exterior wall facing the addressed street shall be more than 250-feet from an approved fire hydrant For cul-de-sacs, the distance shall not exceed 200-feet • b Fire hydrants are to be located. The preferred locations for fire hydrants are. 1 At the entrance(s) to a commercial, industrial or residential project from the public roadways 2 At intersections 3 On the right side of the street, whenever practical and possible 4 As required by the Fire Safety Division to meet operational needs of the Fire District 5 A minimum of forty-feet (40') from any building. FSC-2 Fire Flow 1 The required fire flow for this project is 2500 gallons per minute at a minimum residual pressure of 20-pounds per square inch This requirement is made in accordance with Fire Code Appendix III-A, as adopted by the Fire District Ordinances 2 Public fire hydrants located within a 500-foot radius of the proposed project may be used to provide the required fire flow subject to Fire District review and approval Private fire hydrants on adjacent property shall not be used to provide required fire flow 3 Firewater plans are required for all projects that must extend the existing water supply to or onto the site Building permits will not be issued until firewater plans are approved. 4 On all site plans to be submitted for review, show all fire hydrants located within • 600-feet of the proposed protect site D & E - 88 FSC-6 Fire District Site Access Fire Distnct access roadways include public roads, streets and highways, as well as private roads, streets drive aisles and/or designated fire lanes Please reference the RCFPD Fire Department Access -Fire Lanes Standard 9-7. 1 Specifications for private Fire District access roadways per the RCFPD Standards are• a The minimum unobstructed width is 26-feet b The maximum inside turn radius shall be 20-feet c - d The minimum radius for cul-de-sacs is 45-feet e The minimum vertical clearance is 14-feet, 6-inches f At any private entry median, the minimum width of traffic lanes shall be 20-feet on each side g The angle of departure and approach shall not exceed 9-degrees or 20 percent h The maximum grade of the driving surface shall not exceed 12% i Support a minimum load of 70,000 pounds gross vehicle weight (GVW) j Trees and shrubs planted adjacent to the fire lane shall be kept trimmed to a minimum of 14-feet, 6-inches from the ground up Vegetation shall not be allowed to obstruct Fire Department apparatus 6 Residential gates installed across Fire District access roads shall be installed in accordance with RCFPD Residential Gate Standard #9-1. The following design requirements apply a All automatic gates shall be provided with a Fire Distnct approved, compatible traffic pre-emption device The devices shall be digital Analog devices are not acceptable. Devices shall be installed in accordance with the manufacturer's • instructions and specifications b Vehicle access gates shall be provided with an approved Fire District Knox Key Switch c The key switch shall be located outside and immediately adjacent to the gate for use in the event that the traffic pre-emption device fails to operate d A traffic loop device must be installed to allow exiting from the complex e The gate shall remain in the open position for not less than 20-minutes and shall automatically reset. 7 Fire Lane Identification Red curbing and/or signage shall identify the fire lanes A site plan illustrating the proposed delineation that meets the minimum Fire District standards shall be included in the architectural plans submitted to B&S for approval 8 Approved Fire Department Access: Any approved mitigation measures must be clearly noted on the site plan A copy of the approved Alternative Method application, if applicable, must be reproduced on the architectural plans submitted to B&S for plan review FSC-9 Single-family Residential Sales Model homes require approved Fire District vehicle access and water supply from a public or private water main system before construction FCS-15 Annexation of the parcel map: Annexation of the parcel map into the Community Facilities Distnct #85-1 or #88-1 is required prior to the issuance of grading or building permits. • 2 D & E- 89 Chronological Summary of RCFPD Standard Conditions PRI R T I SUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS -Please com lete the followin O O S p g prior to the issuance of any building permits: 1. Public Water Supply (Domestic/Fire) Systems: The applicant shall submit a plan showing the locations of all new public fire hydrants for the review and approval by 600-foot radius of the project Please reference the RCFPD Water Plan Submittal Procedure Standard # 10-8 and #9-5 All required public fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable prior to delivering any combustible framing materials to the site CCWD personnel shall inspect the installation and witness the hydrant flushing. Fire Construction Services shall inspect the site after acceptance of the public water system by CCWD Fire Construction Services must grant a clearance before lumber is dropped. 2. Fire Flow: A current fire flow letter from CCWD must be received The applicant is responsible for obtaining the fire flow information from CCWD and submitting the letter to Fire Construction Services. PRIOR TO THE RELEASE OF TEMPORARY POWER The building construction must be substantially completed in accordance with Fire Construction Services' "Temporary Power Release Checklist and Procedures" • PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY OR FINAL INSPECTION -Please complete the following: 1. Hydrant Markers All fire hydrants shall have a blue reflective pavement marker indicating the fire hydrant location on the street or driveway in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Standard Plan 134, "Installation of Reflective Hydrant Markers" On private property, the markers shall be installed at the centerline of the fire access road, at each hydrant location 2. Address: Prior to the granting of occupancy, single-family dwellings shall post the address with minimum 4-inch numbers on a contrasting background The numbers shall be internally or externally illuminated during periods of darkness. The numbers shall be visible from the street When building setback from the public roadway exceeds 100-feet, additional 4-inch numbers shall be displayed at the property entry 3. Address: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, commercial/industrial and multi-family buildings shall post the address with minimum 8-inch numbers on contrasting background, visible from the street and electrically illuminated during periods of darkness When the building setback exceeds 200 feet from the public street, an additional non-illuminated 6-inch minimum number address shall be provided at the property entrance Larger address numbers will be required on buildings located on wide streets or built with large setbacks in multi-tenant commercial and industrial buildings The suite designation numbers and/or letters shall be provided on the front and back of all suites • D & E- 90 -3,~~~, ~~ ,~~ - ,~~ r~ ,~_j ~,-5 i _ _. T H E C I T Y O F -- ,,~,R _~., ~,,~ l~ANCHO I:UCAMONGA Std Report DATE November 14, 2007 TO Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM James R Troyer, AICP, Planning Director BY. Mike Smith, Associate Planner SUBJECT. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2006-00337 -ELIAS ALFATA (for Bichara Mitre) - A request to construct a 3,300 square foot full service car wash on .85 net acre of land m the General Commercial (GC) District, located at 8517 Grove Avenue The proposed car wash will replace the automotive body shop, one of two existing automotive service buildings located on the subject property -APN 0207-222-05 Related file Variance DRC2006-00737 Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of • environmental impacts for consideration. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND VARIANCE DRC2006-00737 -ELIAS ALFATA (for Bichara Mitre) - A request to allow a reduction in the parking setback along Arrow Route, a Mayor Arterial street, from the required 30 feet to 20 feet in conjunction with a request to build a 3,300 square foot full service car wash on 85 net acre of land in the General Commercial (GC) District, located at 8517 Grove Avenue -APN 0207-222-05 Related file• Conditional Use Permit DRC2006-00337. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION A Surrounding Land Use and Zoning North - Mini-market and Single-Family Residences -General Commercial (GC) District and Low (L) Residential District South - Vacant -General Commercial (GC) District East - Single-Family Residences (legal, non-conforming) -General Commercial (GC) District West - Single-Family Residences -City of Upland B General Plan Designations Project Site -General Commercial North - General Commercial South - General Commercial East - General Commercial West - Generallndustrial ITEM F & G PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2006-00337 AND VARIANCE DRC2006-00737 November 14, 2007 • Page 2 C Site Characteristics The proposed full service car wash will be located at the southeast corner of Arrow Route and Grove Avenue on a parcel of about 37,000 square feet (0 85 acre) The project site has dimensions of about 216 feet (north to south) by 175 feet (east to west) The site is currently developed with two buildings on the east side there is an automotive repair garage with a small office of about 3,600 square feet that is operated by another individual The property is bound on the east by single-family residences. To the north, across Arrow Route, are additional single-family residences and amine-mart To the south, is a vacant lot that appears to be in use for outdoor vehicle and materials storage To the west, across the street, are single-family residences in the City of Upland The zoning of the properties to the north, south, and east, and is General Commercial " (GC) District The subject property is generally level with an elevation at the north and south sides of about 1,212 feet and 1,210 feet, respectively D Parking Calculations . . T pe of Use S uare Foota e Parkin Ratio S~~aces Re u~red Auto Repair 659 3 1 /400 9 (Buildin A) , Car Wash 600 3 16 n/a (Buildin B) , (re ardless of buildin size) Total 25/25* spaces Required/ Provided 'There are an additional 9 parking stalls on-site that will be used as an area to dry vehicles. ANALYSIS • A General: The applicant proposes a full service car wash of 3,300 square feet to replace the existing body shop The applicant proposes to operate the car wash daily from 8 30 a m to 5 30 p m The existing automotive repair garage will remain in place on the east side of the site and will continue to operate between 7 30 a m to 5 00 p m everyday except Sunday The two existing points of access -one via Grove Avenue and the other via Arrow Route -will be relocated further south and east, respectively, to comply with the City's Engineering Department's technical requirements for driveway location/separation at street intersections The proposed building will be a conventional type of construction consisting of wood or steel framing The exterior will be finished with stucco in a palette of three different colors. An additional primary material will be stack stone veneer while a secondary material will be glass panels and decorative tiles Key features include tower elements with tale roofs, a raised parapet with cornice, and a trellis element that covers the drive aisle where employees will vacuum cars and prepare the vehicles for the car wash (Exhibit F) The applicant also proposes to revise the exterior of the existing repair garage so that it will match the car wash (Exhibit E). Enhancements include new stucco finish, the addition of glass-paneled roll-up doors to replace the one-piece overhead door at each garage station, a raised parapet, the addition of "stackstone" veneer, and the construction . of a 'tower' element at the office area. Furthermore, the existing parking lot will be improved to comply with current City design and development standards including new paving, stall striping, and landscaping (Exhibit G) F&G-1 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2006-00337 AND VARIANCE DRC2006-00737 November 14, 2007 • Page 3 B Variance DRC2006-00737 The applicant is requesting a variance to allow a reduced parking setback along Arrow Route frontage of the protect site. Per Section 17.10 040-A of the Development Code, the required setback (measured from ultimate curb face) is 30 feet The applicant proposes a reduction to 20 feet (Exhibit D). The purpose of a variance is to provide flexibility from the strict application of development standards In order to grant a request for a variance, the Planning Commission must make all of the following findings Generally, these findings focus on unique or specia- circumstances applicable to a specific property Following are facts to support the necessary findings Finding 1: That stnct or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the objective of this Code. Fact/s• The protect is impacted by both existing on-site development (e g., the existing automotive repair shop -Building A) and new City requirements which affect the layout of the site. The property is less than an acre (0 85) in size and is located at a key intersection which involves the incorporation of specific technical criteria for locating access points and on-site circulation patterns. Taken together these factors limit the net buildable area of the site and the location of on-site parking areas Finding 2. That there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions app/~cab/e to the property involved or the intended use of the property that do not apply • generally to other properties in the same zone FacUs• The subtect site is located at the southeast corner of Grove Avenue and Arrow Route, an important intersection shared with the City of Upland. The protect is required to construct public improvements in the form of a bus turnout lane and bus shelter along the Arrow Route frontage of the site These improvements are significant for a relatively small lot and reduce the overall usable depth of the property, since setbacks along street frontages are measured from the ultimate curb face. In this case, the curb will be shifted south by about 10 feet for the bus turnout lane with the required setback line being similarly shifted south by the same distance Moreover, the locations of the required access points (e g , drive approaches) onto the site are dictated by minimum intersection-to-driveway separation requirements administered by the Engineering Department and intended to prevent right/left turn conflicts at the intersection Thus, the proposed reduction in the required 30-foot setback from Arrow Route will allow the provision of necessary public improvements at the north end of the property and • the reasonable development of the 0 85-acre site in accordance with all other City standards and design obtectives Finding 3. That stnct or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would deprave the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the same zone Facts Without benefit of the variance for the parking lot setback along the Arrow Route frontage, the applicant would be required to significantly alter the proposed protect and/or • site plan The applicant and staff have worked on alternative layouts and determined that the proposed layout is the most efficient and logical for the size of the property and the existing and proposed uses (i e ,the automotive repair shop and car wash) that will remain F&G-2 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2006-00337 AND VARIANCE DRC2006-00737 November 14, 2007 • Page 4 on-site Except for relief in the required setback as requested by the applicant, the layout complies with the City's requirements for on-site parking and circulation, Fire Department access, and landscaping overall Finding 4 That the granting of the Variance will not constitute a grant of specral privilege mconsrstent with the lim~tat~ons on other properties classified in the same zone. Fact/s~ The Variance to allow a reduced setback for the parking lot does not constitute a special privilege to the applicant The site is relatively small and yet is subtect to the same type of requirements that would apply to much larger commercial and industrial developments which are not impacted in the same manner by such requirements Moreover, flexibility on the size and/or design of the bus turnout lane is limited by the short length of the property on Arrow Route to accommodate it and a drive approach which meet technical standards (e.g. width) for a commercial development Finally, the reduced setback will not impact the applicant's responsibility to comply with required drive aisle widths, parking space dimensional standards, exterior lighting, and landscaping near the adtacent properties Finding 5' The granting of the Variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially in~unous to the properties or improvements in the vicinity. Fact/s~ The granting of this Variance request will not adversely affect the appearance and characteristics of the surrounding area In fact, the protect has been designed to • significantly improve the overall use and appearance of the site at a significant entry point to the City. The protect takes into account the appropriate orientation of the car wash in relation to the nearby residences and businesses, the location of the existing building on the site, on-site parking, and access C Grading and Technical Review Committees The Grading Review Committee (Addington and James) reviewed the application on September 18, 2007. The Committee accepted the application and recommends approval. Their conditions have been incorporated into the Resolution of Approval D Design Review Committee The Committee (Stewart, Munoz, and Nicholson) reviewed the protect on September 18, 2007 (Exhibit J). The Committee accepted the application and recommends approval Their conditions have been incorporated into the Resolution of Approval E Neighborhood Meeting A neighborhood meeting was conducted on August 30, 2007, at Los Amigos Elementary School at 8646 Baker Avenue All property owners within 660 feet of the subtect property were notified of the meeting and invited to attend Three persons from the community attended They did not have any concerns about the protect and attended to learn more information about the protect They considered it a significant improvement of the site F Environmental Assessment Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City staff prepared an Initial Study of • the potential environmental effects of the protect Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures related F&G-3 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2006-00337 AND VARIANCE DRC2006-00737 . November 14, 2007 Page 5 to biological resources, hydrology and water quality, noise, and air quality, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared Thereafter, the City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration A Mitigation Monitoring Program has also been prepared to ensure implementation of, and compliance with, the mitigation measures for the project RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of Conditional Use Permit DRC2006-00337 and Variance DRC2006-00737 through the adoption of the attached Resolutions of Approval with conditions Respectfully submitted, ~1• Ja es R. Troyer, AICP Planning Director JRT•MS/ge Attachments Exhibit A -Location Map Exhibit B -Aerial Map Exhibit C -Site Plan Exhibit D -Site Plan (Variance) Exhibit E - Building A Elevations and Building Section (typical) Exhibit F - Building B Elevations and Building Section (typical) Exhibit G - Building B Floor Plan Exhibit H -Landscape Plan Exhibit I -Correspondence from the Bichara Mitre (applicant) Exhibit J -Design Review Committee Action Comments, September 14, 2007 Exhibit K -Initial Study Draft Resolution of Approval for Development Review DRC2006-00337 Draft Resolution of Approval for Variance DRC2006-00737 • F&G-4 ~ G .. °o a w ~'~} E 4t~ '"aa;. -av! r $ - ®a . „~. ` ! , i ki~xkd..-. ~~ .,co~vNriu. FFs_ E ~€ SB ~~i~'ir°r ~'>d ~ug~ ?E ~ ~ !• axrsa.v ... ..r S ~ ~ F ~'Y _ yr ux ¢ S `~ G xiEn AVE ~ H P~AUON1 E YnS ° ^~+4Y~, ~ ~ ClE xTE Ox 3. ~*MAx~ } EE ~ 2 ~2 Z C a ~xwLp«G PAnAMgxtd w ~ ~ g B! ~ kaalav g~ 'L,1vM ~ry °r•'"`,~,®~~.cu~G ~ a~ tttt ;,.E _ - '_.: o~ asttnnvr.xav,~ x ~ B MAL ,ar",~ ~ 5 -.,,,gm .fx„ ~G a""~ _ ~ e~ wnEa onx AV ~~~ I~N~~~ ~ pi L ~ " rrEwlonx eT ~~~u~E51n~e ERMO&A AV ®~ ~ ~ _~ `~~ o ~ nx4NRKAX... ~ ,AWn~uwT ^LMHyn~ar «~` v w.w .Y~n, .n...« ~ -~ ~~ rcpMTrgam - {Tn ._ _ x , 7 ""xp.~.[",Rk:N~.Sv a uTN~FAMAMPFAA.Y T ~ G a ~~ nfU ~~; i ~ r., t ~ reAx w,L. b ~yq p ... w. i~{y~ a F ~ gCYg6gn~ ' ~ ~.' ~. ' Mx wv SV G [ • G 3 V9 rl i He ~ pT " PEnr ~ B ~ ~x4TE EEF}Il E.Y9'` PygW,ipar ~ } ~ G .. Yi~'.y., ~ U i1o ~ b q ~pY~n~f MMOxx xV q ~t,,.----'~=.4^p ^ ~ CL ° M ~~ 5~~~ (µ i G ~ ~ ~ I t~ ` '- Av L E~ 2 _°C°_^2AY.' ~P lT $evcrto R ~~^ Lp xv S E'$'32°Ey ,~ ~ ~ o ox s ~, tl ~ L a r Lox ~ v AaE.. ~i'o~~xopx A~~-nt ~~~~'~~; i~ ~.q.,~y4~-a~~~~ •v e ~~ ~dARn.AY.-.~ ~ ~~ 7 id - oox v nv 1 ! AAa`{IY >»ay0b 8 ~"{ ~a~o ~ ' ~ :~AV€d~"' F-e~abY~tl~x....s~ a M" vEx"v. ~~ wLVe ~ ~ _ t~ G_-.aM,fLVenAr `a 6 $ 34 ~ fY x1AV ~ s pp s~ ~ ~uar,.waxn ~ 5 ~ _ Y ~4 }~ r~~g a b~xexrox~~ ~! ~~ ~ uN~r ~~ Y ,~ DD. ;~ t G ° ~ ~ ARCHIBALD AV JJ G 6 o tE ~ M/~tI~GN... P~ ! 0 S i p WSM ^ _1tWAMANI,.Y.w xwSMA ~ ~ ~ "µ~ Y a~A 2S ° f ~ ~,nA,.~i ; xw.MµA ~ ~ ~ W ~ F~~~ 'g1~M.EVA&tlaEA.....,,z ~vLS~% .3~.......~~~°r_?'~~f •' B m~ ~ ~ ~~ xu ETNVrt ~~ ~ wUCNRE AV ~ Pp-~Op „~ l'~iI Au~Tn V t N ~~ Av ~,„~, _ tLtxa.1•SM...~3 +ei4'g~ ~u ~ x xET ~ s i`1 :~r2:LF =k;., `.4.r :~ 5_L°P.M'-e x'~.rSau.~-__ o~y,,,v,.SA%]gd.9d..A`.....3G_~ia' # uvTOx eT To J HELMS AV ~ ~~ ...°....,JlEWA6Y ~ 4 OxYV xv SE- G ~ TA N~' Cc i -,~,-,€ pz ~w~++ ~rtxe~PAg ~_~ T Qya J H ~ ". ~t ~~'. r <<S bF € 4Eiu ~ .i.MEIXri6 ~ ~ep N.YXA U'i ~ !:1 (A ~•~MSI(wcoo ~E S T W 7f 33 O _ xn%nqp S q •4P E' ~ ~ ~~ ~ EME u ~~ ~, }1ELLMAN AV 7 ~~ ~t ~~~0~ „ ~~ su.MA~n~ WNTnn Av ~~^...~. y~qp~~ ' Diy ''Oy. ~5 „ ~ ~ ~ A iot nG tuAnx`o~ Na '` Y`r ~~ E^ An ~S ~~ }srp. { nAxc„wooo g4 _ E'L MOHiMA ~ 3 , T u rL '. ~'v_ ,e l_~,"< e°..r"- t„~,.S.t uowAnw A,...... 'Y.P uoxinnA ev 3 }"v O ~nv,r~ ~~f ~, ~ ..~ 4,A _ .,, f LnN,Ai ~, ' xeTT°~ ,' • ~ "'. boos Tweo ° ~~ '~ ~+e ~ uox Er •~' Wd Av !PVx~eL ,_~.. ~ °'` ~x'• WtleUY edtlE, .E r ~ eox .~D f. ©~ ~ .±qr.~~, ~~.~YRMk'poo ry~~ ^~T .~, ti. uxeRPE. ~_ ~ __ .~ +. ~,. is ~,-- ~ r' ouch, w rcY _ r 4T ~3 . .~,«~ ~w WOEgA~.4~ P , .~~~~` AEAn OU CN tltl3M01! •, ,l`° f L xeT i ~~ .yamy ~~':n~ s~ `"€€~ g y[ ~ ~ d ~ ~ ~". ~ r ~C"~i*C :4 a'4 t AnNET.E+.F(, i~ i .-zat S ~ ! PL m ~ E S ~ _ :x ~y r, • ~ +"~n~IL.e,wIE ~ 3:AT f'?~ ~'i,C ai 'vi,~`' ~ vgg ~ ~ ~> } _ n R ~ -v p TES io ~'. ii`•. 6g of ~ ~ w : "r~ :~ N40 ', S ~' ' ~~~ ~~ " t 'ya °~~''~ ~9`'~ g 8099 4 ~ ~5 a H699 .~.~uu ~.~ .._ .;"~_. Y v' g "+ r: _,Q ; VINEYARD AV p'~Ex.w..--.PVU.w~,.. v'yiY.W' ( ,. . '~"+w-iti.'+tx w5'd, t<~.t~ 4`"--^.~+ _H+e+x.1e1'+~..Y~ ~ .. _ _ »,~~`t'." a /4. ! _ aAx OKOq,AV .C ( El ~ lY , FN~ T ft Y 'J '."t E~i ~ ~ACxMIEHT SN ~,.,5 kr _ ~~ w~ aI „`nw Y"1°~ 'f•• m v ~.rpPO+°w„rE W^` _Y„ti~I..,:. - - G G G G ~ = Y_~, ~'.^' ,r '~: ~ CIS Suxs xEA ~ a .r ~ ~ ~~^ - WK j$V..._~'"sr > . `T g~ g oB ,s 5 `','~ NOHniwEPl F ~ B g OHA Q T "0.POYO VISix xV REF w' ~ G .SCAR NELIAN ST ~ dG t A ~4 N4 ^.y} 6 c ~ x ^-~gr+°^°^~~G] g4 r.SOL,PL ;~~' Yfu~ ] _ my ~ ~ ~, ~ w ~ i.~G .p.°~+ 'Eu, Opl ~ 4',~1 ~°'.- f•'~~'R 5 A sx L ¢ ,ra- 4~flp T~'` b £i ti T w ~Sd~ I r ~ ~ wPxgy,s~ • ° ~F~y1rF.~`^n~ ~ i wee ~~ Mv'x~ ti~rfb',`;`r~. ~'t~ ~j + 5;~'Sxpe ~n.._-L~ S~r..~ ~ ~ ®~ ~ ~ g" ~ EpL "" E .. ^"p~p ~ Q ~ ~ .ssEE u ME nsTA o11 {q E'p0 ~l°" ~S~~P' (vj;1 +Z f ~k P L > W OI 11LLE~ ~ P (V ~ ~ ~ g ~ b i ~ OOp00;~ @~ Q~ ¢} ' 1' ) ,.. :'J°- °o a ,J ~~ T 9$ „,~epxA,vlexAAL.~,.,~. F,Sx}---..v=a LM y~SAV~ru^1~... €~ s.w rom 1 f ~ ^W ~ `, is ., ~ m,.y,.~ ._~°"~-_._,~......~. ~...,.'"'«..w~..,,r^-"s-gN Y2LLSVUiw. ~3K^aLwvee'cT l`< •ry~~ • °I.Ns.~ •o ~cen ci ~ F ~ } ~~ / - } ~~..._.....~~ J w_ F p • ~'F•YO !V }~n z1e ~ W w5 cr Q1 ~" O W O ! ~ p~@L@.Sk.. ,..,,~,v,., •,x „g~`Tn, cue sT~ ~~a~4~ ari~~la~3 d STS +p k3~iT 3"~O` i '~ Mon cT W nFAnn ~ odd u$i ~ 1 } ~ ~ - swims T~~~~~~• ..." ,."y,°`" ^~S,,v~; "v„aa~~~, 1' Sj .S°6 atgg wws p '~' '~ .pw*1 ; ~ A °'°-~EaA,~~ '*.A vTeh' T 1 `!'t~'~.r8~`"... ^'............ QM ^ -,..~ '4'4- "L~ ~ T ~. e'i e8 gg t wuEi I..V _ ALVp'~ "' S eowMST i u -~.-^`s'o'mlf• ~y_~ . ~j7 _ vE r~ ~(~.(,.-'~• , ~F T. k-`L' .`s~;c.rrx r~~- uZa:~ _ _._~ ~ ~5 5'65 G`G u~ MMARAV N ~ - SS m3 ~~ 'eT 1 i5 ~ ._ , A ~ E ~op W~~ yy 5'. S' ~ ., y 4 IAYIMAS•M ~ ,.; ~ I h c '` VE AV ~ f` E r! _it cK ~ 14' v Lr, t .~f _ 9 x 4'V; !-~jrt1~? ,4~rar ,~r 4r~,r-:`r'{rV2~-~'< ~5-,.,K '~1 "~~,~yT ~L~ f7~IF~"..~a1'.yJ~. - -7 ~. - ~ Tl _' j , r~~ ~1~. ~^ `z~ ''~ 'S~'ks~f~: ~, r 1~ r~` t}f .Z it ~~"'~ " Y.. f *_f _,_ r .r 1 ~r h. ~ r... p f St+ av + ~ - T ~ ~1 fi~T ~ t~ ~ ^ c ~ r, ,.~ ~ x M ~t" 1 a ~~ +tT ~~~irSY r '{~ K~~~~~ta "'`'~,y ~~`y`,~ . i V .'~,, -~4 t,_ b' 'k}~~ r`'~..v7',~ r ~C Tr ~~~'~~~yr rr ;,f-s'.. ~~r~~~f'. .~:~"7,;;~ ~~,}xr.'r~ 1 ~ ~~ EXH I B 11" A `} ~ ` ~ r~e ~ ;~T~-- } it:~~n~~ ~ ~~~~r ~sy ~h~~~ ~~~~ ,~'4y ,ice ,, t• ~e~,.. ,Sf` '~Y~1~~bi `$ ~' ~~ t~~ + dLy,u 3 t7 ~. .fir ~t I.;w ~~~ 54_. ~~ ;r P~4.~_„ µ~*if"' ~~v.2'~'_1<~ >~. f~~~v,~ ,~I....F.fi~~, ~~, ~~ . _. Conditional Use Permit DRC2006-00337 and Variance DRC2006-00737 {-.i,+,.w +.s Y F~~ e~ --".- u' _ ~ ~u =~~^_~^~T^'~~ ~n~PpA*.swy~Y y ~w -_ L _~ _.~ _~ ~,y_ - "W3.3t} v ~^}[ ~?-R ~'k. ~ -C." - _ t if Y ^'t aL~ y~ ~ 3 ~`:'" T ~~~ T t Y -a _ _ _ - jy , - k ~ . z _ '.~, ~ ~ ~.~ tai - '~ ~ _ r o, ~ --~ y6K}' ~^4~ a~ ~"~ {S J.~I f _ ~a 1 r~~ J 1 s..~S~i:i. ~ ` t S ~ „ ~,. q ~.~ ~t~n~-Y sir I~]°J.~ "~~ ~~ ~? ~ ~~,~n~ ~~ ,~~`9t~ ~ t 4 ~ ~' ,: ~, ~ ~~ ~ a ar ~~,•ir. 3 ~ _ `CIA a - s ~p " ~ ~i i r i ' ~ ~ yak.:. ' ~'y ` ,.. '~ ~R ~: z~i ,`1-d' ~i ~ ~. -~ ii 4 ~"Nh N e r P 1 a _ ~ f a_ e .~ ~ ~~ ~C r ~~, y ~'~.1~•.r. 'S°a ,~e ~ ~~ _ ' _ ~j i w `. ~ ~4 is ~~ 4 ~ ~i'~d -.},}~'], A ro° r~ ea~,= r,~ ~~ , '~,... ~ _ j .~„ r M i~ ~!~ 99-1`}&.~ -i k ~ °t` ~ ~' '1i Jr 7 a -.- ~ Ti ~ Wv~ . t~t,~ £'3" fX~ ~ n aE A ~' ~. t1- ' ~. Y~ # 4 ~,};-.~. ,„ ~ t is.uaas'1+~. c- ~ nhTMM°* a ~ r a<.W ,~~~ ~, ray ...}....~, y~~A~-. -Sy;7q~ iix t~a~ J~,y - 5 ,~ t~ ,~ ~~ ~ z Project ,,,4 ~ k~ ~ 9 t ": ~ ~i~ rl ? , rr , `~ 4+ ~q ,5 1 ?tk p ' r ~. ~~~ ~t` tl'"°""q }~~i~* ~.,..~5, i~ t, iCE ~ ~~, Site ''"~,%rr$ .~ '$"°' i. ~2,~ K ~F33ID9y~ ~ ~ ~ w~ x ~ 1 r ~c~~ ~ ~ Jay i ~i ~h ~q i "-'~'~' [s'~ w. k .~i'"~ ~ i - ~~ a Mk{ k` .. '~E ~. ~~'" y3s d~ri ~ ~'~ ~~4'd ~~~` Y¢~d~o i r ~~. L. "~' 'W~-~«. ar cat 7 •~ a~n° ii~ak^~i4'+ ~aak ~r ~q ~` r~r ~ ~' i z ~ ° ~~ ant ~ ~ ; _~`ti~t 1 ~ xi ~~i yt,. e,~ r i '.. a ' ~ ~'}' a 1 ~ Td ~ ads ~ T _ ~' r t '~~'t~Z~,~+ ~~ ~ 7 ~~ ~ _ ~~ ~~~~ ~ "y'Py~ y y;~ .'i4 W lt~tay~ a~ *r ~''q^ '` b ''LL apt 1~ ~ ~: ~ a~ ~ R ~ rk~ e~Aea * „FL ~ ~ ~ a~%~.M..o.~ w'~`.~ ~, p~,l'''~~ e~ ~ "' i +S" ev rv a ~. Mn` h 1 4 r~~ ss , r u _ ~ ~ ~~g~t ' `~ ~`zf .'i, t ..°*"~l~"~i 1 ~~a~a ~..,asa~a m. P ~1x 'n ~, ~~~ ~, t `qtr F ~ j `3~+ _ ~~-,' c x_ °rr` ~~u ~~A,'TF~-eav vbs.- E ,-t ; -`r¢y I~ ~'. P~ ~ a~ _ S t y~' .~* y ~ ~ ~ F lU i py. ( „^ ,~ ~°" i r l ~J 4 » ~ ~ r J""c~ ~ ' ~~ wV a } f M1x@~y''~!~P t e ~. ~sn r,~ y.~,~' y 3 r ~ u„ pr° a~ _ ~ z ~ %` 1~ ~ n ~j~ ~ a d ''~*'~ 7" ~~~ l~~ ~ x ,. fit. ~~ °~ a~.g M i~~ t ~ _ ,y N' ~ ~t ~ ~q z s a'~. ~ t~~S ~,;„~"~y a r ~~y .,.P~ as ~'u' 'fit ~`'~'~E' ~ FY _ jJ r z ! - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~"Yy +~ ~'4a~+ai i ~~h.~. f~cff~ + K~`~+'~i,~+w~~, ~.e.~; µ `~~~ r~~~~~ j ! P3~' 6~ Fl ~ ~ ; - .}`~ - , -d4` ~( ~ p ~ ~v. ~ ~~'.. ~ ~ a ~ ~1 n~ 3a4 ~ tt ~ Ta a ~ - .,~ ` 4.'~' 't c3 ~p~ r W x~ 1 ~~~ti_ ~~ ,_~ - `~+ ~.,<S.ya i .H. ~ ...x a '",y b t ',-~' o a "SSA- ! ~ :{Ii ~ ~ } ,~, ~ `' , .~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ e, r k ~ _ is a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ e ~t ifi :~ ~ t A' ~ 'a~~,~ ., ~ ~ N ~~~~ ~~k ~ y ~ +-. a° ~ ~ ~' i ~ i-. _ ~ a:..Jasess~~~~~a ~r~" ° l ` r' L ~ ~ ~ 2"`h ° r~~~ ~ c f ~ "t 1 ~" ~g ~i 1 ~ ~ ~ ~~ fF`~`i 1- ~ k m ~ N' ~ ~ '. ~L)' LT R rye- -~~ 4i4[~ ~ '~ ~ 'il it j~ ~~~~Ir ~T ~~~r ~` '~ Rx ~ ~ ~~~' _ J ~ `~ ,~ z r .h ~ ~:, 'M~s}~ t .~ ~ .~ + V ~ ~ ~ ~'I ~ bz, ^~ y w.~t k'WI fi3h r t ' ~' ~' .~ ~ L~ ~ ~ b ~ ~ ~ '1 M "4~" ' ~ ~, . ~ ~ i a ,~ r.j ~ d ~_`~ 'S ~ ~ ~ h~a ~ f _, .,.>i-~ ~a.~ ^-'k~'~ ~ ~,~,~'a.'3~~;e't, ' lie in ~{ 'rj ,,~' o ,;~, ~~ ~ `.<~tee "'.,'.«-a ._ ~:~ 4 "x,16 k4p ~ ~~g"~jl ~ ~I d +S -"11~ ar7 g5~r ~ 7 - 9 V`" ~ c''i4~x3` 4 ~' ~"~~§ ~ ` 7 - ~ ~ ~i~ N °~ t i _ S i~ . °"7zv a- ~ ~ i.. ,r 1'~R' i um% s ~ ~ '~... C ."4. a~ ' -~i fi •.e ~ ~ y ~ ~r ~ ~ MK4 .. L ~. ~i1~ ~ r (.~lj t~l k i {r.~i~$~ ~ ~ y ~ql ~~,111 ~ t'' p i' a '.~' T - `a~'y'ai i%'n`+~,"xLswdfa~Mi eMl~ to Nw~IS r p V' v ~ ~ ~~ ~ !';yh ~y„ ty,,,yy,y, f h.- ty , 4. ~)a~~ ^Y whf$ta ,... • ~~'^.`~~~ - ' 'c15~ ,I~.r i ` dy ti ; -aM' ,~, ssfiy Y.iA~, ~ - ~ h.u.x°,t s~.ut..'. ~~~`q -? ~~ ~~~~~_ ~~ i [~y~ d,~t m.as~~tw .S r~9 ~^rEr'~an ~tcur.~. '.Z"t~x7- rxts ',~ ti . ~. f'L ,:,,: aL .. ,.~Y~~..~.~~~ ~1.~.. naJa.J..~..~.~~ r'~ ~`}ii _~~la ~'~h ~b ~ ~-1~ ~a 3 y ~ qgg ~~~~ ~~ ~~€s~H qi3 a t xo raa wor xv~ mr 101M MQIIiI ANGKi ~~ r o ~~ _., ... W I ~ ~o O ~ OI Q I - 6 1~ ~ C r r I- ~ 4 ~ d -r..r..~~.~r ~.` ~~- ~.~.. ..ti r ~ m 'dZ'd~d ~I~OJ9 ~Hl N'C~~cI fills ~ •3 ', a ~~~00-900Z7?JCI ~ ; e ~ I ~° ~ ~ ~ ~ €~~ ~ .. ~ ~ k k ~~ ~~ • ~R ~ Bk ~ § ~s ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~8 ~_~ '~~ ~~~~~~ j ~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~5 ~ ~~ ~~ ~~~ ~ Y ~q 44~~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ lt~aa8~ ~5~ ~ ~~~ €~~~ ~~~~~i~~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ dl ~~~a1~.1.~ea~~6dfd3t~ 4i+oN ~u .x k ~ 9 ~~ O ~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ a O - mb 6' k 0 `-~~ d' ~i ' ~ ~ ~LLl~~ RA7W d1170Y °J Alq QIL~P7 11 TI7A Alq LHOL~O •'I ~70Y °C ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ - -~ ' ~ A 9~ a . ~~i x \ ~~~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~p OI I fl D ~ x I ~a I ~~ i I O ~ x a~ s B M ~ ~ p b ~9 ; ~ I ' ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ •, 8 ~~' rwm ~w ~ ~ n ..~,,. EXHIBIT C O ~ ,~ ~ ~ I }= =-~--~iF--- D ~ ~ 4 _ _ _ a __ .-_ [ X I C 8 t - - ~-w~ _. ~ ~ Ul = J q@ tS 4 I ---~-~p V R ~- 4 l3NNfLL HSHM 21V~ M3N -$ I ~ OI O h O I ~ ~ " - _ q - __ rf~as~a Ir---------- , -1~ xM~~ - - F &~16~t~,~'d ~n0?J9 • • ~a 3 ~ ~ a t~8~ ~ ~ s t~€~a ~i~ V 9N0W V JI I J ~~1 /IV V O - ~ ~ ~~••-rr~"•' ~••• m m _ W dZd~~! ~I~0~19 ~Hl Nd~d fills ~ ,s 's g L~~00-900Z0?~4 1 ~ s s s s~ .~:fr - " " CHtd,,~,s„ `Y` ~1~~6~"il ~ "~~ RR hJ aa ' Y Y `~` Ryi_tS Y ~ r ~iki Nnnl ~~~ ~~ Z f r 1 j., ~ ~r y M1 f y~~ c ~ jf ` 1~,[}~ ~~ ~. I •~~~il s~>S~~. III ~ ,wf'~,~ 4 Ch` py ll t~ ~ ~'~~i~b t S~ t~ ~ iiPO 'K3 1 S`HE'' l'~ Jw ~ 1} w „ ~'~~I~~;w °i 3~~~ ~~~~~~ ~r'aa~d~k "Y~ "I.vr 1,~E~ ° ~ r ~ .h 4 (~ +[ w +b "~' ` ~6c ~_d "' ~`' ~•alcCtC '~ jlp~ ~ ~Y4 v \~ 9s ~L IY 5 ~ 1.-~ A T ~~ ~- k I 'M~ ~5 ~~ In y,~ ~, 1I ~~ fG~ ~ ~ IM~ r 'cr 'r ,;-~ "'~" ~`p ,~ E~ W~-r w~ ~ ~, (C'~~ J '~ R L I 17i~ n ~ _ ~ ~m '`v"dl~ " lad + r` u ~a t N (~0 ~( w ~, ~ ~~ b J V to I~ ~. W ~ H O o' Q I _ R~ ~9Q `~ ~~K w ~~id l~ID~ I~,9~lq i ]~ ~26 .... ~ fl z ~r s f ~~~I s ~t ~ ~ ra r 1 ~"~ »1+1~ ~r ~ ~ 6 r ~ ~ ~ Q ~n x, i ~~ ~~1 g pp n+~'I i~j~tr~, ~~i~ YY ~~3 YY ~ r T~ a g g 30 ~2 ~~ u ~11~~L~~1 ~~u~ ~' t G 5~ ~ 6~ Y~~xpp ¢ ~ ~ ~ f<* {{NJ Ra ~QJ [d'$p45I I$96{ R Wg11W qG p K ~ ~ ~ - RI =-- 1 F _~ ~ ~ + a~ ~ '. Q - 1 mp 6' k ~~~.~p1 % I I ~ ~W~a7 rtl i I L J1'T1Cd R' ~O Alq LiGt70 JI T1WI Altl p1007 Jl T~ I I i I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~, ~ ~~ ~ ! ~I Oi iAdlhlfd~~dl5dfd~t4 awl wr ywur~ xn~.ow~ OI M TM) QWllil ~1111i00 lO I ~I ~ ~ ~ I II --~ Ila a a y a a ~k~-~ m ~ .I ~ rv _ ~O I ~ ' h O O O ~I a Dy ~ ~~.-- -~ I a ~---~ a ~ ~ ~® ® - - e x k _-_ t j b I ~ ® __ ~° ~ _ ~o ' m c~ 4 w Q ~ I. S~ _, -~ \ ;- \ ~ \ 1 1 F I i . i ---------- i 0 ~ ~~ A ~"~$' '13NNRL HSt+M bd~ MAN ,, a F ~H ~ i o ,; I ~I ~ tr ~ ~ o ~ p k~~ O~ s I b I , ~A_~ur~_--- - -- -------n~-•----- --- -- I ~ lr____________it n ~ I n ~ I I EXHIBIT D -~--- - - - F ~~~~8y ~/~0~9 ~ E ~A G f =R~~ sasses a~8~ ~~ ` ~ ~ a a ~ l~g~a ~z! .rY wY ~ ~l±!~Yr- 4~rL -n ~y Y W m + w~~~ ..r.. ~.. ~ +r~~ YW~~w~r~rwnw• r aYY ~Z~1d ~~~~9 ~~l ~ ' ~ ~' LGGOO-900Z7~CI d- 9419 5N011'dn~~~ ~ ~ ! s .i s ~ s , ~ s ~ ~ i as ~~ i a i t~ is ~ ~! is fE r! ~: ~1 tC i! ,~ Is( ~ ,! ~ !a j ~! ~~ ~~it ~~ E( 11 I~ a ~i i~ !i ~I ~~ EI ~i E6 E3 tC iil i~ ~~ 0000000000 0 0 ~~ • • ~~ ~~ 5~ • EXHIBITE ,a~g ~a 3 "R~~ t~QQtt ~y$~ ~~ .~'__ ~". _ ~z~d~d ~~o~~ ~Hl g o I L~~00-900Z~?Ja -9- 9CI~9 5N011'd/~~~~ ~ ~ s ~~ '3 • o ~ ~;~~ t. t t ~ ~` !t tr ~! F~ ~! ~t t~ ,! ds~ ~ ,! ~ tt ~~ t0 tt #~tt ~~ !! tt'sl it tt i~ ti ~! ~~ Et ~i ~7 1~ ~~ ~!t t~ ~~ 0000000000 00~ ~~ EXHIBIT F ~~ F&G-10 S G s o,[~~ sasses a~8g ~~gg~ '~€~ ~~~~ a t~~~~ qi9 • doNOW~d~n~ oH~Nb~ ~Zb~d ~I~O~{9 ~Hl ~ LG~00-900Z02~4 ~..w~__~.._~ b~1~ri~i.~~w.~_4~~n-..ti~~~. ~~ ~n~~ n++.~yw~n ~_ ~_ ~~il~nHS sn9 C1Nd Nb~d ?J00~~ ~ s a s m ~YYY+ g ' o o ~ a~ o-~ a ~. 0 F n p k~ k k§k D tpt ~ ri ~~ ~i EI ` ~1 ~ r~ !~ ?~ ~(~ pI 000000 5 Q o~ - QQ ~~ • EXHIBIT G „~ „ ~a s ~~~~ sasses ¢~~~~ ~Y~g ..~~ ~:.:::: ~tl$si qi3 doNOwd~no oH~~d~ -~--~_ -~~:_~.~_~~._ ~~= ~ ..::_:~. ..~ ..._... m 8 'd Z'd ~d ~I~O~l9 ~Hl ~ ! ~~~0o-9oozo~a Nd~d ~Hidd~saNd-t i ! ~ .~ 6 'S 1 o J ~ x ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~C~ ~ w~ F- ~, ~~ ~~ O' ~I i ~ ~ ~ ~~~~~~~~a ~ i i i ~~~~~~~~~ ~ E ~ fsl ~@ ~ i E it ~~~~~i~~1 ~ ~ ~ ~ , ~~~ ~i~E~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~ f ~~~~E~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 00000 ®©o®®o® • tt~t r fri i ~ .... a ff f ~ i ! ~ ~ Isla ~ ~~~~ ~~ I ~ ~ { ~t ~ l~~a ~ ®®® 0 '~: ~` E~ fY ~~ ss EXHIBIT H ---- anNand-ano~~ F & G-12 ELIASALFATA P.U~.BOX56743 Riverside, CA 92517 Tee: (9Sl) 780-8547 al fata8S47na eartlzlink. nett Custom Home Design -Commercial Design -Remodeling -Construction -Supervision • Project location: 8517 Grove Avenue Rancho Cucamonga Scope of proposed project Car wash and Detailing Hours of operation 8 30 am to S 30 pm Numbers of employee Sixth employee Owner Bechara Matra Manager of a car wash in the city of Los Angeles for four years 1992 to 1996 1996 to present i°esponsible and supervisor of a garment factory in Los Angeles with over 25 employees This project will be a family owned business with my son, we are planning to keep this business to us with no intention of selling it This project will provide a good future for my son and a comfortable i°etirement for my wife and me • Bechara Matra • EXHIBIT I „~ „ • DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 7 40 p m Mike Smith September 18, 2007 VARIANCE DRC2006-00737 -ELIAS ALFATA (for BICHARA MITRI) - A request to allow the parking lot to reduce the parking setback along Arrow Route, a Mayor Arterial street, from the required 30 feet to 20 feet in conjunction with a request to build a 3,300 square foot full-service car wash on a 85 net acre of land in the General Commercial (GC) District located at 8517 Grove Avenue - APN 0207-222-05 Related file Conditional Use Permit DRC2006-00337 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSEMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2006-00337 - ELIAS ALFATA (for Bichara Mitre) - A request to build a 3,300 square foot full service car wash on 85 net acres of land in the General Commercial (GC) District, located at 8517 Grove Avenue The proposed development involves removing the ma~onty of the westernmost of the two existing automotive service buildings -APN 0207-222-05 Related file Variance DRC2006-00737 Design Parameters The proposed full service car wash will be located at the southeast corner • of Arrow Route and Grove Avenue on a parcel of about 0 85 acre The protect site has dimensions of about 216 feet (north-south) by 175 feet (east-west) The site is currently developed with two buildings, on the east side there is an automotive repair garage with a small office of about 3,600 square feet while on the west side there is an automotive body repair shop of about 2,200 square feet The property is bound on the east by single-family residences To the north, across Arrow Route, are additional single-family residences and a liquor store To the south is a vacant lot that appears to be in use for outdoor vehicle and materials storage To the west, across the street, are single-family residences in the City of Upland The zoning of the properties to the east, north, and south is General Commercial (GC) District The subject property is generally level with an elevation at the north and south sides of about 1212 feet and 1210 feet, respectively The applicant proposes a car wash to replace the existing body shop The existing automotive repair garage will remain in place The two existing points of access -one via Grove Avenue and the other via Arrow Route -will remain in use Twenty-five parking stalls for employees and customers will be provided with an additional 10 along the north side of the site to be used as an area for drying the vehicles (total 35) Landscape coverage is 15 percent, the minimum requirement is 15 percent for this development district Currently, the site is fully paved with asphalt and there is no landscaping on the project site The proposed building will be a conventional type of construction consisting of wood or steel framing The exteriors will be finished with stucco in a palette of three different colors An additional primary material will be stack stone veneer while a secondary material will be glass panels and decorative tiles Key features include tower elements with the roofs, a raised parapet with cornice, and a trellis element that covers the drive aisle where employees will vacuum cars and prepare the vehicles for the car wash Storefront glass provided on the east • and south elevation of the convenience store but has not been provided along the west and north elevations (the elevation facing the streets) EXHIBIT J F&G-14 DRC ACTION P,GEND,q - ELIAS ELFATA September 18, 2007 Page 2 The applicant proposes to revise the exterior of the existing repair garage so that it will match the car wash Enhancements include new stucco finish, the addition of glass-paneled roll-up doors to replace the one-piece, overhead door at each garage station, a raised parapet, the addition of stackstone veneer, and the construction of a 'tower' element at the office area Furthermore, the existing parking lot will be improved to comply with current City design and development standards including new paving, stall striping, and landscaping Staff Comments The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion Mayor Issues The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this project Revise the north side of the carwash so that there is an overhead canopy, trellis, or equivalent at the office entrance 2 Revise the landscaping (berms, plants, and/or screen walls) within the area along Arrow Route and Grove Avenue to effectively screen the car wash and drying/parking areas 3 Revise the landscaping (berms, plants, and/or screen walls) at the northwest corner of the project site to emphasize the importance of the street intersection and enhance this entry corridor into the City • Secondary Issues Once all of the mayor issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the • Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues The trash enclosure shall incorporate some of the materials used on the main buildings including stackstone veneer 2 Add climbing vines along the perimeter wrought iron fencing 3 The design, including materials and dimensions, of the entry monument sign at the street corner shall match the sign shown on page III-214 of the General Plan 4 All windows and roll-up doors shall be bordered with trim Policy Issues The following items are a matter of Planning Commission policy and should be incorporated into the project design without discussion 1 All ground-mounted equipment, utility boxes including transformers, and back-flow devices shall be surrounded by a minimum of two rows of shrubs spaced a minimum of 18" on center 2 All doors shall match the color of the adjacent wail or glass panel 3 A Uniform Sign Program shall be submitted for review and approval prior to the consideration of any signs All signs are subject to the City's Sign Ordinance Staff Recommendation Staff recommends that the project be approved, with the noted revisions to be verified by Staff, and forwarded to the Planning Commission for review and . action F&G-15 DP,C ACTION AGENDA - ELIAS ELFATA • September 18, 2007 Page 3 Design Review Committee Action The Committee recommends approval of the project to the Planning Commission with the above-noted revisions incorporated and verified by Staff The Committee also requested the following a All trellises shall be constructed of larger timber members, i e the dimensions of each beam should be no less than 4" x 12" b At all pedestrian level areas, the trim shall be constructed of concrete -not foam c The beams on the trash enclosure and trellises shall have the same detail cuts Staff Planner Mike Smith Members Present Stewart, Munoz, and Nicholson • • F&G-16 CITY ~"~ ~ANCI~~ CUCAMONGA A1~6 ~~ ENVIRONMENTAL ~- INFORMATION FORM RECEIVEC - f~l_ANNING part I -Initial Study) City of Rancho Cucamonga (Please type or pant clearly using ink Use the tab key to move from one line to the next Ime ) Planning D~v~s~on (909)477-2750 The purpose of this form is to inform the City of the basic components of the proposed project so that the City may review the project pursuant to City Policies, Ordinances, and Guidelines; the California Environmental Quality Act; and the City's Rules and Procedures to Implement CEQA. It is important that the information requested ~n this application be provided in full. INCOMPLETE APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE PROCESSED Please note that rt rs the responsrbrlrty of the applicant to ensure that the appl~cat~on rs complete of the trine of submrffal, Crty staff wdl not be avarlab/e to pen`orm work required to provide mrssrng rnformat~on t Application Number for the project to which fhrs form pertains Prolecf Title j ~.~+~ G~'D ~~ f~L /-1 Z.4- Name & Address of project owner(s) ,~jEGH/}~A ~ / ~ /~ / / 4~ ?/D /~1.4 ~l/Sf3 ,~ ~ /'~'~2) q4~- g(Sb Name & Address of developer or project sponsor ~EGHf~-~A- M / % /e f f ~f 7/D A~NS /» Contact Person & Address EG l~s ~. ~ Lr,¢7-,/~ Name & Address of person preparing fhrs form (rf different from above) ~~ f_f /VT~ICT ~~it°~~ Telephone Number Tq~~1 ~ 7g'b _ ~~~~ • • Page 1 of 9 Created on 5/22/2002 4 09 00 PM EXHIBIT K F & G-" 2) Provide a set of color photographs that show representative yews into the site from the north, south, east and west, wews into and from the site from the primary access points that serve the site, and representatrve views of significant features from the site Include a map showing location of each photograph 3) Project Location (describe) ~ SD/1?H ~'EFS T C,DiP~ O~ *1) Prowde a full scale (8-1/2 x 71) copy of the USGS Quadrant Sheet(s) whrch -ncludes the project site, and -ndicate the site boundaries 4) Assessor's Parcel Numbers (attach addrtronal sheet if necessary) ~~f~7_ 22 2 ~~`~ D f~Q~ *5) Gross Srte Area (ac/sq ft) `~~_ ~ ~T ~ ~ ~~ ~Gji *6) Net Site Area (total site size minus area of public streets & proposed dedications) ~ ~~ 2 ~j, ~, f"~ f' Q~ g~~~-C • 7) Describe any proposed general plan amendment or zone change whrch would affect the project site (attach addrtronal sheet rf necessary) JV'~~- 8) Include a description of all permits whrch wAl be necessary from the Crty of Rancho Cucamonga and other governmental agencies rn order to fully implement the project 9) Describe the physical setting of the site as rt exists before the project rnclud~ng information on topography, soil stability, plants and animals, mature trees, trails and roads, drainage courses, and scenic aspects Describe any existing structures on site (including age and cond~fron) and the use of the structures Attach photographs of significant features described In addition, cite all sources of information (i a ,geological and/or hydrologic studies, biotic and archeological surveys, traffic sfudres) /MP~?t9 V~y ~5~: ~ uy`/ C'a~sT//Il~~ f31~/L4 /NG~S ~}-~yy l~f~-f~ K/ Nl~ /~i~ ~ f~Y • EnvironmentallnfoForm Page 2 of 9 Created on 5/22/2002 4 09 00 PM F&G-18 ~lnformation rnd-cated by an asterisk (*) is not required ofnon-construction CUP's unless otherwise requested by staff 10) Describe the known cultural and/or hrstoncal aspects of the site Crte all sources of mformatron (books, published reports and oral history) 11) Describe any Horse sources and their levels that now affect the site (aircraft, roadway Horse, etc) and how they will affect proposed uses S TI"J- Ill~Oi4~2 p ST/~ ~~T Ti~A-~!~/ C~ 12) Describe the proposed project rn detail Thrs should provide an adequate description of the site rn terms of ultimate use that will result from the proposed project Indicate rf there are proposed phases for development, the extent of development to occur with each phase, and the anticipated completion of each increment Attach additional sheet(s) rf necessary f'~24i~J5~ cR-,e I,UA-S~-/ acv ~i~.s i ~nr~ ~s~: ~ air ~ r~ ~xi~ rya fin /~-U~ ~~f'~S/-f0/~ ~c C~ G~/`A:SH j~ /~~~~~~~i_A-Ci~~Gj A- n/ ~x / S Ti ~ l~--~ ,t3 f~ /' t~ ~ iv Cn U ~ ~o /~ f3D,0Y ~ HQ ~,, ~°/ed i~GT j,Ul~ ~ E C~rys 7-~P UC T~l~ ~~~.~ ,°ti`f~-,~ ~~d C®e~-~~i ~Tfoav ~ rrt D~th G~°ewi r~iv~ ~~U~ ~-~ o,~c~ LS ~r .~ Tom.-1~~r"~ • EnvironmentallnfoForm Page 3 of 9 Created on 5/22/2002 4 09 00 PM F&G-19 • 13) Describe the surrounding properties, including rnformat~on on plants and animals and any cultural, hrstoncal, or scenrc aspects Indicate the type of land use (residential, commercial, etc ), intensity of land use (one-family, apartment houses, shops, department stores, etc) and scale of development (height, frontage, setback, rear yard, etc ) ~ o ~,yocu~~ s) rH~ F.~S T ~cS~.~ ~7V Ti~L .r/~RT~f CONI M~~(,~~ FSl1J~/Uj /~ L- fc/FS ~ ClT`/ Off' ~ItDG~3-/V l] ~~ >1J ~~t/ Z/~f'C~ CHoUS~s, C~ous~s~ 14) Will the proposed project change the paftern, scale or character of the surrounding general area of the pro~ect~ ~~ • 15) Indicate the type of short-term and long-term Horse to be generated, including source and amount How wdl these Horse levels affect adjacent properlres and on-site uses What methods of soundproofing are proposed GLF~ GU.4~sH C.si ~/ ~G /~~ ~ ~ . s,~c~te T % E'er M ~i6 I.S,~ ~-N/7 ~___t) y i5 f~- TA-CHc~ *16) Indicate proposed removals and/or replacements of mature or scenrc trees /l/' /i9- 17) Indicate any bodies of water (including domestic wafer supplies) into which the site drains /t/'/f4" EnvironmentallnfoForm Page 4 of 9 Created on 5/22/2002 4 09 00 PM F&G-20 18) lnd~cafe expected amount of water usage (See Attachment A for usage estimates) For further clanficat~on, please contact the Cucamonga County Water Distract at 987-2591 a Resrdentral (gal/day) Peak use (gal/Day) b Commercial/Ind (gal/day/ac) ~~~ Peak use (gal/min/ac) S 19) Indicate proposed method of sewage disposal ^ Septic Tank ~wer If septic tanks are proposed, attach percolation tests If discharge to a sanitary sewage system rs proposed indicate expected daily sewage generation (See Attachment A for usage estimates) For further clanfication, please contact the Cucamonga County Water Distract at 987-2591 a Resrdentral (gal/day) b Commercial/Industrial (gal/day/ac) RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS: 20) Number of residential units Detached (mdicate range of parcel sizes, minimum lot size and maximum lot size Aftached (mdreate whether units are rental or for sale units) 21) Anticipated range of sale paces and/or rents Sale Pace(s) $ to $ Rent (per month) $ to $ 22) Specify number of bedrooms by unit type 23) Indicate anticipated household size by unit type • EnvironmentallnfoForm Page 5 of 9 Created on 5/22/2002 4 09 00 PM F&G-21 24) Indicate the expected number of school children who wdl be residing within the project Contact the appropriate School Districts as shown rn Attachment 8 • a Elementary b Junior Hrgh c Senior Hrgh COMMERCIAL. INDUSTRIAL AND INSTITUTIONAL PROJECTS 25) Describe fype of use(s) and mayor function(s) of commercial, industrial or institutional uses 26) Total floor area of commercial, industrial, or institutional uses by type `~~ ~ ~ `S+ c ~~- 27) Indicate hours of operation ~ `~D~ ~ M ~-~ --7 ,D O ~~ • 28) Number of employees Total ~p Maximum Shift Time of Maximum Shift Q H~s 29) Provide breakdown of antrcrpated~ob classifications, including wage and salary ranges, as well as an ind~cat~on of the rate of hire for each classification (attach additional sheet if necessary) ~S',~/pE~'I~'/so ~ /' l ~t~17~YT/D '~ ~ ~ S ~ ~/ r 30) Estimation of the number of workers fo be hired that currently reside rn the City "31) For commercial and industrial uses only, indicate the source, type and amount of air pollution emissions (Data should be verified through the South Coast Air Quality Management Distract, of (818) 572-6283) /V~~i~-- EnvironmentallnfoForm Page 6 of 9 Created on 5/22/2002 4 09 00 PM F&G-22 ALL PROJECTS 32) Have the water, sewer, tire, and flood control agencies serving the project been contacted to determine them ability to prowde adequate service fo the proposed pro~ect~ If so, please indicate them response • ~~ 33) In the known history of this property, has there been any use, storage, or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic matena/s~ Examples of hazardous and/or toxic matena/s include, but are not Irmrted fo PCB's, radioactive substances, pesticides and herbicides, fuels, oils, solvents, and other flammable liquids and gases Also note underground storage of any of the above Please Irst the matena/s and describe them use, storage, and/or drscharge on the property, as well as the dates of use, rf known ~!D 34) Will the proposed project involve the temporary orlong-term use, storage or drscharge of hazardous and/or toxic materials, including but not Irmrted to those examples listed above ~ If yes, provide an inventory of all such materials to • be used and proposed method of disposal The location of such uses, along with the storage and shipment areas, shall be shown and labeled on the application plans /~~ 1 hereby certify that the statements furnished above and rn the attached exhibits present the data and information required for adequate evaluation of this project fo the best of my ability, that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct tot he best of my knowledge and belief I further understand that additional information maybe required fo be submitted before an adequate evaluation can be made by the Crfy of Rancho Cucamonga Date g 2 3 0 ~ Signature ~~ Title ~ ~Y%(.~~, • EnvironmentallnfoForm Page 7 of 9 Created on 5/22/2002 4 09 00 PM F&G-23 ATTACHMENT A Water Usacie Average use per day Residential Single Family Apt/Condo Commercial/Industrial General and Regional Commercial Neighborhood Commercial General Industrial Industrial Park Peak Usage For all uses Average use x 2 0 Sewer Flows Residential Single Family Apt/Condos Commercial/Industrial • General Commercial Neighborhood Commercial General Industrial Heavy Industrial Source Cucamonga County Water District Master Plan, 6/00 • 600 gal/day 400 gal/day 3,000 gal/day/ac 1,500 gal/day/ac 2,500 gal/day/ac 3,000 gal/day/ac 270 gal/day 200 gal/day 2,000 gal/day/ac 1,000 gal/day/ac 1,500 gal/day/ac 3,000 gal/day/ac EnvironmentallnfoForm Page S of 9 Created on 5/22/2002 4 09 00 PM F&G-24 ATTACHMENT B Contact the school district for your area for amount and payment of school fees Elementary School Districts Alta Loma 9350 Base Lme Road, Suite F Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909) 987-0766 Central 10601 Church Street, Suite 112 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909) 989-8541 Cucamonga 8776 Archibald Avenue Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909) 987-8942 Etiwanda 5959 East Avenue P O Box 248 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91739 (909) 899-2451 High School Chaffey High School 211 West 5th Street Ontano, CA 91762 (909) 988-8511 L C J EnvironmentallnfoForm Page 9 of 9 Created on 5/22/2002 4 09 00 PM F&G-25 ~, ~ ` :J ` ~ `~ ~ ' -n ~ ~rT. ~r-_--r-_.__~r_. u'1 ddU 1 •• ~ .14 1` `. ~~ ~ ~ ^ '~ 11 ~ ~ Jr='_ _ ._-= I ~r It I `_ _ ~,I£1 r ._.,,.___± - y ~_ _~ F1J\C7~i~`.~,~.'~.~.~'_ (7H, tl~i'r~- r __y. C__~_ .-' li __I'__~__ I~~~_` _ ~,~f ~ „ d}3f1J V ~ {]1vt~Iai(1 ~, .. inv .' 1 ~iF4 -'I r' R I a a~+'o,7~~r ~ - r 'I ~J+Y ~{ it ~O~l3A 31~IV5fY ~' ~Z , . -- ,~ ~'7 ,~ . U ~~ i i ~ ~ ({ 'r= it-J•~ ., ,,, ~ ~ ' , ,{ `I ~! '¢ . n .E n ~ ~ Q Ty't~ - ___ ( - - z-- - 1 ~ c i ~ ~Iv~i U r~ 1 4 i p~ , n ,.3 I n n t _-t a,_. y, 1 ~ II, Ov fn Z ~~~ ~ I~ -- - IL-~ y fr j ~ w 'c rJ~ 1 , ,1 1 , _- ''ul= fi ; ~ 3n d `y I~ _ 1 L It ~•t w !{ fl ^ - ~ '` ,, a. ~ x ~ I, „ ~~ ~v ' II at'I _...-e _.r_ ~~ x= ~1 ~ I, 9 - '^ _' _' 'iI d~ t I fL Ji it ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ t ~ ; _ 1~ ~ i,' r~~ ~~_~'~ (~ a,~~ '~ ~ '~ I , _ 1~~-- ~~; ~~w • ~ .. w I 11 W ~A V I' ~~' I Fli9 4I If ~ I all t~ I { jt' , ~~ ~ ~:- --=--„,1 ^Cp~ j, ~ , wNe i ~' -~- - ~__- ~ - - f1 ! •' mi, I~ _.~ _ -.i~ _ t~ Ji~!L tj aI _ _,+- a~r v_ ~ ~ .... y - _ _ _ ~' `~ 2I1~ rid +r~ ,, sal; `" Z,t___-~ y -z .~ { -~ "_"~ - ('''~,~~Ey~ - - ,I I ~ .. L~ . ~_ ~ t ~li_._ll _ ~ ~a ...~ ~~~I_ °~' C ~#~ y~~.,c II ~I ~~ - ' _ ~F' (~ O'~~~ ~'' ~~ r w 1' I .fir ,, _ `- >-,' ~- I _ , a ~k ~ ,... ---~!,t+ .x' n',~ _+ t `pZ'~'_31nd-I~ _ _ QY7 K1~' sli '~ ~{^~ fy,Il>.c ~, CJIId I1 f~ 11 la~,~ ~' i~ 1 t' ~~••••••~~ a_ i ' ~' '- aL J - vrC- +7+• i•.t ~ ,,. --1f - ~ h I~' ~ ' I ~ _ _ 14.= ~ _,. _ _ ~ ht j~` - 'F'.d.131'}3MS - i 1 %~[ F ~ ~ 1~ _-- 'ii 3/I N..-- Vii, s ' ,( ~~_'~n ,~- _+~J~ '` ~~ •oP-~( OE '711 'r-d ~ , i ~ '{ 11 IC j ~~ ~l ) I ~ ~ -'~-fi '1 __ ,~ _ IL`c~"_~ ~4~J~r~l?J~~,I ~ a! °a 'L d ',i 1~!~I~ _I~ _, _1; v,a r~ isi ' , it ~- • -` f`-_'I~nw7~''` "_=t;- ( 1~ =~.r - -r,...__--- ~^''r ?, *~ • °. ~.._ ~"" _•~•y 111 __ .~... ~. ~.. ~I ~ ,I ~~~ '1.# • ~ r ~i ~t fills! !~ ~ t I 1 ,,~ !I „ I~ .2 ~~ .. ~ M.w. .d.,w-:.~- ~~}~~c-:`- a ~ 'fir FM" " y~ /'. G ~ ,.`.~ r' Ff.._ 371 Tl'M, .f_~r E Ii 7 1•. r"".~.``--, t°^.Je,.:. ~n~.w ...+xu,> -.,.mow, i i}""S_-..-'°14~"-,,,w'.~=-+"'"_ $$ fr '., ~,'~ d''_1' i#7bnd~~ r . t ~~ )= - - , k ~-_~` - ~1 „ I ~d ~I ` `lI it 1~---=1 -;{ ~ afl _ ~ !l {~ d , r ;i !I- --- i+~` ~ ~~~i--- ---~I¢_ _l ~I~~ ~ ~ _ ~ ;f " t +i ~i{,.'.C;r it ~'__ t ~Ft to ~ j __ _ij a ~i q^~L i 3nN _I - ~r-1~ ~ W'Yd,3 II, , it )~ _`'~+ v~ L~f ~r -III ,V~'~ ~I- J~ -- ~' ~ -1" rl 3~ rtA7-"~~..... , ~s ~I Ij '4 ~~ ~~I. r `~ 11 „a~ *=~ 'Ic=' it k~~ I _ ~ mlI_I' _-- { i I.. if3av -9ivrnt r -h °'~I -= -- - a ^I} ~ ~' 1 _, ~ ~~ ~ i vhn 6't~rF~+S' ~{ I '~ If ,_...: I.i It _ _ ^_s {`~'~ ~'= 3 _ _ ~ dn~~ H v,,u2i - _ ~ ` ~ 1~ ~{ ~ I' .~~. ~' p ! I II ~ ` ~ I~a I- - ,r ~ _ ~'- 7 ' ~ ~ ~'d 4 't 'I ,;~ ~. '--1{'-°-, I` ~3n t• i ~ ! ~ ' I' ' Olf bF I i~ it _ I (i;? mjt _ ; ~! ~ y f~ {I 1 ;"`-~~ ' jl ti)~~'"-~I {I J _ - 'il __-____ +, yr J ^ _ 111 li .~~C.11~T l~ - ,t, m 11 A7 ~IM I 1 ly~t,~. i ~., q.~S~pt~~ 1' ~I ' env _ ~ _ I { S~ ~; ~ ~~ rx~~h~' rvvs I' ail - ~ i4ty~~ 1~P' l':.~- _ 1' {I ~. {~.,;.~~=~: 11 I~K,~' '~ , di ~+ ---='I ° I~_ `rr 11 y2= ~ '~~ _---_.1; ~_ry~S'f4~? n• _ {~v_S' I;sAv y 11 I~ ~I ~ M~ ~ ~ .'t Y !I u,'i ~- _~ :. I ~ { w vll a 4 ~1i I ~ ~ - - - NI> ~ j O _ ~IPo r'I it ~ v, - _ a ({ I` ~ ( __ ,I t t ~-.- Ip JI I C. 1 - ~ `, ° ,y I ~ln I 1 v v ,I 1 ,L ~~ I `_ '.I JI' 1 ~, ~ I G.~ 7 I ~ ` ! II ,,- QI `i - 3 s t I ~ .Jhi ' u , I if-1- ' I '' t '~~'t~• ' ~U. I ~ -, I ~~'~ :~1 ~,n ~ ,~' I(~ .~ ~7 I I I I~ 1 3 Ir ( ~ I' " it Nll- II i Y` I ~_ 11 I ~ ! l.) .{~ ~' ~ (r ~ 2 - _ II I f` `S Y ~' , <<1t'leln ~I. t~l ! ~ i -{F(- 6I II ' Il •' 7ua ~^ I 1, I ~- -^.a_ `na.., .-x „P,~ ~ r w:x h 3AV } ~ ' •i ~ ~ '^ ~ ,~ NJb•1~Jf1! }s++wA.i • I crs _ r _ IF ~ y 4 r •" _j }: ' 1:: ~r ~ srna. scam mac. -__d 1 '4~ ~ ~ _ rn H " f =ii3![PI'sSI 1 ~ ~`- ~!Y aL a `Y ~ nom`. _ -!>; x 'tz, ~ ~ ;~sl Z ~~II~~+I. } ~ il,,~,~ fI 1 ~ i ~ r'~ • k ro + ~ ~ tu'~t~ xl ' 1 ' ! ~' y 1i ' ~-11K7Q rri ~n J5 t ~4~~ 4 1 I / +I -;1 ~ ,-J~~, aI s ~~talttiuti6 ~ _~ X11 - ~ .' ~~r _.1 I, _ { _ ~-~ v. ' narf~u~t~i, ~ ; ~- _- 4 `TI" I ~ ~ '{ .. ~ ,7. • II F'sFtr+ ~~iti • r __, ~ F M1 e ' ~ ~ •I 4 ~I=Y'- 1 ~ , I ~ I ~~ Y' . RSAiC~' ~, ii •-1~J-.-~•` li i II ' ~ u~ y~ 1, 'I__ I ~~!71 F,j k ~yj 1 t' • I -' _:tlL~ I i~•,~~~ ~l1 kIC ' fi ~ II~II * ~ 6 ~kt__.d, ~ t'. r t lis~e Sr !V~ ~ r yiQ I' i i __ F & G- 26 D~~~006=003~~ ARROW HWY u. i ~ w~ QID ~ w o' F&G-27 T r~ • ~~~2_00~~003~~ F&G-28 ~~~_200~0°00~~~ F&G-29 ~~~~DD~J-OO~~~ ~Y~Sti h~fi~ J~~°iP `~;p `4 °~I ~M1 ~.5! sa _i~ ".frnt~ ty ~6t7 i »ti ,.(' ~' tc"n ~~ J' Jnr , r . Yr Fl ,x. is. r x Y ° - ,. <p_.~.~ *5aif n "" Y ~~ ~~~ Cy { It ~"~F ~'~ C ^~ y m ~ ~ ~ ~d ~A.!im~ryfs~ my~+;~'" ~~,yfM; `/xY,F,<Y 'r Y -" F l ~° i .!~ i ~ 7dy. ' ' 5 i yt~' ~ ~ ' ~ - a s y . i C ~ l( .m r... :.~.1 y. . f1Y . ! y) n li ~ _ w°~ x~~J 5 t, ~ x7 S' 1 sY t ~,..+ r+w!'" fl~~~,~'# ~y~ ~^r reksLY y`~'~5.r.-°,cflc~~ ~ h`"^'.. `r `' :e1 ~:'~ .RYA :.... y k r t.,„ 1Y~?a^ =°ti ~- ~~~ e~~r~ ~~~;w (,~wn~w7'i{', l,r i x .{° °i... !~° "~°..^ °'4 y ~ ai y r ~Y ila3,.f it .eY<)R~ }Yi' fr f „ hTV! ~ Yd . ~~ 4 'l~tY ~` `~h `It d ~ ~ ` ` F n . I y l ~i n _ a ' ~ r r a )' wr ~ n ~..~ fn ~m ~ ~ .,M, 7 A ~I ' ( 'd, r x D"..~ ,~ M/t °5 '~ ( A f"M T 1 ~ Y~ ",~7' n ~?" f. ~ Y ~ ~ C N I . n ' ' ° « r tiA v '+,~ 5 ~ 3` Lh~ t `e4. H 4 'oP.M y° ~ ' h, • () } ~ ~ u I ef d , ~ ~ y ,,~ w ,. , , ~ ~ flr T ! f 4 )y'~ fI°., n ~r d~~'J4'h'4 3R°J h~ ~ ~. i i S y A ~ Y ~ t r w 1 , wJ t4a111 Li A s f0 iJ7~~ ~.~, s ~ il'~r M1Y } ~ ~ -~ f~i S ° ~ ~, * "' ~ A t, ( OY 5"~M Ft~.,n y .. sti ~ "rid +"~s.'~" 9 14:~r ~A %~MF E°~ `4 ~ < `4pi ~ - a ~ !n ^ - ~ f 5 " ~ l r n HM 1/ ~ Y ~ / G"Y K, .. ( fi "`t,4 ,,. 1 f . '1-'Yn , r QY n [ a . . ~ ~ ~'"~` i A ~j~ °~ +4^ w e t~~ ; STy, ~n ~ - u _ ~ i, . 4 ~ _ S <~,t_"r 1 F/ ~ ~ v ~`r, uar , ~t~ ~r i C1 / ' t ~ I „ ~, _ ~ v , r e J nyy t r. ~ „ ytt at ~. rs.~ A. t 11 )x ~ 1 f ti ~i~ft yA Yl ~f } f A ` l ~ y ° ~ t ~ . .. .. ~ S ^f~f ~x l , ~7 ~ `lh ! ~~~ 1 A ~ f i + 1"r H} i~ K y ~ t' z^ 4 ~ir ~ r r I ° ~ T , v.. ^' i ! ~ ` ` rL ~, c . t - ' ~ 1' ! , _~ - it ' t '' ~ • I~ I~ u F&G-30 ~~~~OO~J-OO~~~ • SI 4 +~ Yx i ' ~ f ' , Fit f?. a" ~ r,'~ s - p f Y ! r..:w~ , f,~.. F ~r.St ~'~ Y .I r,~r tY`i y'r 1:,...7`d J~ {Sf~£1i4~~+~dl:r '3~~'~y~a~, Nl}rfi^ ~ rv rvi!`~ ~ 1, t - is Ia !r4 ~ r ~C ~ 3 ~'' .. T~.r%Q'w I~.wi L}fti.. '' G ~ I fi ~: • F&G-31 City of Rancho Cucamonga ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM INITIAL STUDY PART II BACKGROUND 1 Project File Conditional Use Permit DRC2006-00337 2 Related Files Variance DRC2004-00737 3 Description of Project A proposal to build a 3,300 square foot full service carwash on 85 net acres of land in the General Commercial (GC) District, located at 8517 Grove Avenue The project site is developed with two automotive service buildings The proposed development involves removing one of the existing automotive service buildings and replacing it with this carwash 4 Project Sponsor's Name and Address Elias Alfata 6626 Wilding Place Riverside, CA 92506 5 General Plan Designation General Commercial • 6 Zoning General Commercial (GC) District 7 Surrounding Land Uses and Setting The proposed full service carwash will be located at the southeast corner of Arrow Route and Grove Avenue on a parcel of about 85 acre The project site has dimensions of about 216 feet (north to south) by 175 feet (east to west) The site is currently developed with two buildings, on the east side there is an automotive repair garage with a small office of about 3,600 square feet, while on the west side there is an automotive body repair shop of about 2,200 square feet The property is bound on the east by single-family residences To the north, across Arrow Route, are additional single-family residences and a liquor store To the south is a vacant lot that appears to be in use for outdoor vehicle and materials storage To the west, across the street, are single-family residences in the City of Upland The zoning of the properties to the east, north, and south is General Commercial (GC) District The subject property is generally level with an elevation at the north and south sides of about 1,212 feet and 1,210 feet, respectively 8 Lead Agency Name and Address City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Contact Person and Phone Number Mike Smith (909) 477-2750 10 Other agencies whose approval is required (e g , permits, financing approval, or • participation agreement) None F&G-32 Initial Study for Conditional Use Permit DRC2006-00337 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 2 GLOSSARY -The following abbreviations are used in this report CVWD -Cucamonga Valley Water District EIR -Environmental Impact Report FEIR -Final Environmental Impact Report NPDES -National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System NOx -Nitrogen Oxides ROG -Reactive Organic Gases PM,o -Fine Particulate Matter RWOCB -Regional Water Quality Control Board SCAQMD -South Coast Air Quality Management District SW PPP -Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan URBEMIS7G -Urban Emissions Model 7G ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact," "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated," or "Less Than-Significant-Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages (/) Aesthetics ( )Agricultural Resources (/) Air Quality (/) Biological Resources (/) Cultural Resources (/) Geology & Soils ( )Hazards & Waste Materials (/) Hydrology & Water Quality ( )Land Use & Planning ( )Mineral Resources (/) Noise ( )Population & Housing ( )Public Services ( )Recreation ( ) TransportationlTraffic ( )Utilities & Service Systems ( )Mandatory Findings of Significance DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation (/) I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this c se because revisions in the project have been made by, or agreed to, by the protect proponent TIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared Prepared By Date C ~/ Reviewed By ~ti'`~--~U` .- ~'-''~-~t Date ~ ~ I • • F&G-33 • Initial Study for Conditional Use Permit DRC2006-00337 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 3 EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS 1 AESTHETICS Would the project a) Have a substantial affect a scenic vistas () () () (/) b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but () () () (/) not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a State Scenic Highway c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or () () () (/) quality of the site and its surroundings d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare, () () (/) ( ) which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area Comments a) There are no significant vistas within or adtacent to the protect site The site is not within a view corridor according to General Plan Exhibit III-15 b) The protect site contains no scenic resources and no historic buildings within a State Scenic Highway There are no State Scenic Highways within the City of Rancho Cucamonga • c) The site is located at the southeast corner of Grove Avenue and Arrow Route and is surrounded by a variety of land uses To the east are legally non-conforming single-family residences To the north is a mini-market and additional legally non-conforming single-family residences To the south is vacant land These properties are all zoned General Commercial (GC) District Across the street are properties developed with single-family residences within a residential zone in the City of Upland The visual quality of the area will not degrade as a result of this protect Design review is required prior to approval City standards require the developer to underground existing and new utility lines and facilities to minimize unsightly appearance of overhead utility lines and utility enclosures in accordance with Planning Commission Resolution No 87-96, unless exempted by said Resolution d) The protect would increase the number of streetlights and security lighting used in the immediate vicinity The design and placement of light fixtures will be shown on site plans which require review for consistency with City standards that requires shielding, diffusing, or indirect lighting to avoid glare Lighting will be selected and located to confine the area of illumination to within the protect site The impact is not considered significant • 2 AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES Would the project a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or () () () (/) Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural uses b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a () () () (/) Williamson Act contract c) Involve other changes in the existing environment, () () () (/) which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural uses F&G-34 Initial Study for Conditional Use Permit DRC2006-00337 Comments a) The site is not designated as Prime Farmlands, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance The site is located at the southeast corner of Grove Avenue and Arrow Route and is surrounded by a variety of land uses including residential to the north, east, and west The property to the south is vacant There are approximately 1,300 acres of Prime Farmlands, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance within the City of Rancho Cucamonga, of which about one-third is either developed or committed to development according to General Plan Table IV-2 The mayor concentrations of designated farmlands are located in the southern and eastern portions of the City that is characterized by existing and planned development Further, two-thirds of the designated farmlands parcels are small, ranging from 3 acres to 30 acres, and their economic viability is doubtful, therefore, they are not intended to be retained as farmland in the General Plan Land Use Plan The General Plan FEIR identified the conversion of farmlands to urban uses as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated b) There is no agriculturally zoned land within the City of Rancho Cucamonga There are no Williamson Act contracts within the City c) The site is located at the southeast corner of Grove Avenue and Arrow Route and is surrounded by a variety of land uses To the east are legally non-conforming single-family residences To the north is a mini-market and additional legally non-conforming single-family residences To the south is vacant land The nearest agricultural use is a strawberry field located at the northeast corner of Grove Avenue and Foothill Boulevard about 50 mile to the north Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated 3 AIR QUALITY Would the project a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the () () () (/) applicable air quality piano b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute () (/) () ( ) substantially to an existing or protected air quality violation c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of () () () (/) any criteria pollutant for which the protect region is non-attainment under an applicable Federal or State ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions that exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant () () () (/) concentrations e) Create obtectionable odors affecting a substantial () () () (/) number of people Comments • • a) As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 6), continued development will contribute to the pollutant levels in the Rancho Cucamonga area, which already exceed Federal and State standards The General Plan FEIR identified the citywide increase m emissions as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council The proposed protect is consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 4 F&G-35 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Conditional Use Permit DRC2006-00337 Page 5 • b) During the construction phases of development, on-site stationary sources, heavy-duty construction vehicles, construction worker vehicles, and energy use will generate emissions In addition, fugitive dust would also be generated during grading and construction activities While most of the dust would settle on or near the project site, smaller particles would remain in the atmosphere, increasing particle levels within the surrounding area Construction is an on-going industry m the Rancho Cucamonga area Construction workers and equipment work and operate at one development site until their tasks are complete They then transfer to a different site where the process begins again Therefore, the emissions associated with construction activities are not new to the Rancho Cucamonga area and would not violate an air quality standard or worsen the existing air quality in the region Nevertheless, fugitive dust and equipment emissions are required to be assessed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) on a project-specific basis Therefore, the following mitigation measures shall be implemented to reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels 1) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions Contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification 2) Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, the developer shall submit construction plans to the City denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low-emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the project Contractors shall • also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning staff 3) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAGIMD Rule 1113 Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high-volume, low-pressure spray 4) Ail asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108 5) All construction equipment shall comply with SGA(~MD Rules 402 and 403 Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods • Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices • Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is • carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction • Suspend grading operations during high winds (i e , wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with Rule 403 requirements F & G- 36 Initial Study for Conditional Use Permit DRC2006-00337 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 6 • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means 6) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quai~ty Control Board [RWQCB]) daily to reduce Fine Particulate Mater (PM,o} emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 7) Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions 8) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel-powered equipment where feasible 9) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use After implementation of the preceding mitigation measures, short-term construction air quality emissions would remain significant as noted in the General Pian FEIR (Section 5 6) Based upon the Urban Emissions Model 7G (URBEMIS7G) model estimates in Table 5 6-4 of the General Plan Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR), Nitrogen Oxides (NoX), Reactive Organic Gases (ROG), and Fine Particulate Matter (PM,o) would exceed SCAQMD thresholds for significance, therefore, would all be cumulatively significant if they cannot be mitigated on a protect basis to a level less-than-significant The General Plan FEIR identified the citywide increase in emissions as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council In the long-term, development consistent with the General Plan would result in significant operational vehicle emissions based upon on the URBEMIS7G model estimates in Table 5 6-4 of the General Plan FEIR, therefore, would all be cumulatively significant if they cannot be mitigated on a protect basis to a level less-than-significant The following mitigation measures shall be implemented 10) Ali industrial and commercial facilities shall post signs requiring that trucks shall not be left idling for prolonged periods (i e , in excess of 10 minutes) 11) All industrial and commercial facilities shall designate preferential parking for vanpools 12) All industrial and commercial site tenants with 50 or more employees shall be required to post both bus and Metrolink schedules in conspicuous areas 13) All industrial and commercial site tenants with 50 or more employees shall be required to configure their operating schedules around the Metrolink schedule to the extent reasonably feasible 14) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate high efficiency/low polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters 15) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping L F&G-37 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Conditional Use Permit DRC2006-00337 Page 7 • After implementation of the preceding mitigation measures, the General Plan FEIR identified the citywide increase in operational emissions as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council c) As noted in the General Pian FEIR (Section 5 6) continued development would contribute to the pollutant levels in the Rancho Cucamonga area, which already exceed Federal and State standards The General Plan FEIR identified the citywide increase m emissions as a significant and adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council The project proposed is consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated d) Sensitive receptors are defined as populations that are more susceptible to the effects of pollution than the population at large The SCAQMD identifies the following as sensitive receptors long-term health care facilities, rehabilitation centers, convalescent centers, retirement homes, residences, schools, playgrounds, child care centers, and athletic facilities According to the SCAQMD, projects have the potential to create significant impacts if they are located within 1/4 mile of sensitive receptors and would emit toxic air contaminants identified in SCAQMD Rule 1401 The project site is located immediately adjacent to residences However, carwashes do not emit toxic air contaminants Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated e) Typically, carwashes do not create objectionable odors No adverse impacts are anticipated • 4 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES Would the pro/ect a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or () () (/) ( ) through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U S Fish and Wildlife Service b) Have a substantial adverse effect on riparian habitat () () () (/) or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally () () () (/) protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native () () () (/) resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances () () () (/) protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance F&G-38 Initial Study for Conditional Use Permit DRC2006-00337 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 8 f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat () () () (/) Conservation Plan, Natural Community conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or State habitat conservation plan Comments a) The site is located at the southeast corner of Grove Avenue and Arrow Route and is surrounded by a variety of land uses To the east are legally non-conforming single-family residences To the north is a mini-market and additional legally non-conforming single-family residences To the south is vacant land The site is developed with automotive-related uses and has been previously disrupted during construction of infrastructure and surrounding developments According to the General Plan Exhibit IV-3, and Section 5 3 of the General Plan FEIR, the protect site is not within an area of a sensitive biological resources Therefore, development of the site will not affect any sensitive biological resources b} The project site is located in an urban area with no natural communities No riparian habitat exists on-site, meaning the protect will not have any impacts c) No wetland habitat is present on-site As a result, protect implementation would have no impact on these resources d) The majority of the surrounding area has been or is being developed, thereby disrupting any wildlife corridors that may have existed No adverse impacts are anticipated e) There are no heritage trees on the protect site, therefore, the proposed project is not in conflict with any local ordinance f) The project site is not located within a conservation area according to the General Plan, Open Space and Conservation Plan, Exhibit IV-4 No conflicts with habitat conservation plans will occur 5 CULTURAL RESOURCES Would the project a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the () () () (/) significance of a historical resource as defined in § 15064 5~ b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the () (/) () ( ) significance of an archeological resource pursuant to § 15064 5~ c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological () (/) (} ( ) resource or site or unique geologic feature d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred () () () (/) outside of formal cemeteries Comments a) The protect site has not been identified as a "Historic Resource" per the standards of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 2 24 (Historic Preservation) There will be no impact b) There are no known archaeological sites or resources recorded on the project site, however, the Rancho Cucamonga area is known to have been inhabited by Native Americans according to the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 11) Construction activity, particularly grading, soil excavation and compaction, could adversely affect or eliminate • • F & G- 39 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Conditional Use Permit DRC2006-00337 Page 9 . existing and potential archaeological resources The following mitigation measures shall be implemented 1) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction actroities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will • Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value • Consider establishing provisions to require incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point • Pursue educating the public about the area's archaeological heritage • Propose mitigation measures and recommend conditions of approval to eliminate adverse protect effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, following appropriate CEQA guidelines • Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the project area Submit one copy of the completed report with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving • c) The General Plan FEIR (Section 5 11) indicates that the Rancho Cucamonga area is on an alluvial fan According to the San Bernardino County database, no paleontological sites or resources have been recorded within the City of Rancho Cucamonga or the sphere-of-influence, including the protect site, however, the area has a high sensitivity rating for paleontological resources The older alluvium, which would have been deposited during the wetter climate that prevailed 10,000-100,000 years ago during the Late Pleistocene epoch of the Quaternary period, when the last "Ice Age" and the appearance of modern man occurred, may contain significant vertebrate fossils The protect site is underlain by Quaternary alluvium per General Plan Exhibit V-2, therefore, the following mitigation measures shall be implemented 2) if any paleontological resource (i a plant or animal fossils) are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified paleontologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i e , paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be I~mited to, the following measures • Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing activities • Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert • earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find F&G-40 Initial Study for Conditional Use Permit DRC2006-00337 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 10 • Prepare, identify, and curate all recovered fossils for documentation in the summary report and transfer to an appropriate depository (i e , San Bernardino County Museum) • Submit a summary report to City of Rancho Cucamonga Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to San Bernardino County Museum d) The proposed protect is in an area that has already been disturbed by development The site is developed with automotive-related uses and has been previously disrupted during construction of infrastructure and surrounding developments No known religious or sacred sites exist within the protect area No evidence is in place to suggest the protect site has been used for human burials The California Health and Safety Code (Section 7050 5) states that if human remains are discovered on-site, no further disturbance shall occur until the County Coroner has made a determination of origin and disposition pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 5097 98 As adherence to State regulations is required for all development, no mitigation is required in the unlikely event human remains are discovered on-site No adverse impacts are anticipated 6 GEOLOGY AND SOILS Would the project a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, intury, or death involving i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as () (/) () ( ) delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known faulty Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42 ii) Strong seismic ground shakings () (/) () ( ) iii) Seismic-related ground failure, including () (/) () ( ) liquefaction iv) Landslides O O O (/) b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoils () (/) () ( ) c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, () () () (/) or that would become unstable as a result of the protect, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table () () () (/) 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use () () () (/) of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater Comments a) No known faults pass through the site However, it is in an Earthquake Fault Zone, and is m the Rancho Cucamonga City Special Study Zone along the Red Hill Fault, according to the General Plan Exhibit V-1, and Section 5 1 of the General Plan FEIR The Cucamonga • • • F&G-41 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Conditional Use Permit DRC2006-00337 Page 11 • Fault Zone lies approximately 4 5 miles north This fault is capable of producing MW 6 0-7 0 earthquakes Also, the San Jacinto Fault, capable of producing up to Mw 7 5 earthquakes is about 15 miles northeast of the site and the San Andreas Fault, capable of up to MW 8 2 earthquakes, is about 18 miles to the north/northeast of the site Each of these faults can produce strong groundshaking As the project site is located within a special study zone, to ensure that geologic impacts are less-than-significant, the following is required 1) The applicant shall submit a geotechnical report to determine any design and construction requirements within the Special Study Zone prior to issuance of building permits b) The proposed protect will require the excavation, stockpiling, and/or movement of on-site soils The Rancho Cucamonga area is subject to strong Santa Ana wind conditions during September to April, which generates blowing sand and dust, and creates erosion problems Construction activities may temporarily exacerbate the impacts of windblown sand, resulting in temporary problems of dust control, however, development of this protect under the General Plan would help to reduce windblown sand impacts in the area as pavement, roads, buildings, and landscaping are established Therefore, the following fugitive dust mitigation measures shall be implemented to reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels 2) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RW(~CB) daily to reduce PM~o emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 or re-planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible 3) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM~o emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction 4) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM~o emissions from the site during such episodes 5) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWC~CB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM~o emissions c) The General Plan FEIR (Section 5 1) indicates that subsidence is generally associated with large decreases or withdrawals of water from the aquifer The project would not withdraw water from the existing aquifer The site is not within a geotechnicai hazardous area or other unstable geologic unit or soil type according to General Plan FEIR Figure 5 1-2 Soil types on-site consist of Tu~unga Gravelly Loamy Sand association according to General Plan FEIR Exhibit 5 1-3 No adverse impacts are anticipated d) The majority of Rancho Cucamonga, including the project site, is located on alluvial soil deposits These types of soils are not considered to be expansive Soil types on-site consist of Tu~unga Gravelly Loamy Sand association according to General Plan Exhibit V-3 and General Plan FEIR Exhibit 5 1-3 These soils are typically used for irrigated small grams and pasture plants No adverse impacts are anticipated e) The protect will connect to, and be served by, the existing local sewer system for wastewater disposal No septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal is proposed F&G-42 Initial Study for Conditional Use Permit DRC2006-00337 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 12 7 HAZARDS AND WASTE MATERIALS Would the pro/ect a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the () () () (/) environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the () () () (/) environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and acadent conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or () () () (/) acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within 1/4 mile of an existing or proposed school d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of () () () (/) hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962 5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment e) F^r u oro~ect located within an airport land use plan or, () () () (/) where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, O O O (/) would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an () () () (/) adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of () () () (/) loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wiidlands~ Comments a) The proposed project, a carwash, will not involve the transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials The City participates in a countywide interagency coalition that is considered a full service Hazardous Materials Division that is more comprehensive that any other in the state The City has adopted a Standardized Emergency Management System Multi-Hazard Functional Plan to respond to chemical emergencies Compliance with Federal, State, and local regulations concerning the storage and handling of hazardous materials and/or waste will reduce the potential for significant impacts to a level less-than-significant No adverse impacts are expected b) The proposed project, a carwash, does not include the use of hazardous materials or volatile fuels The City participates in a countywide interagency coalition that is considered a full service Hazardous Materials Division that is more comprehensive than any other in the state The City is in the process of developing an Emergency Operations Plan to meet State and Federal requirements The City has approved a Local Hazard Mitigation Plan which has received State and Federal approvals Compliance with Federal, State, and local regulations concerning the storage and handling of hazardous materials or volatile fuels will reduce the potential for significant impacts to a level less-than-significant No adverse impacts are anticipated • • • F&G-43 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Conditional Use Permit DRC2006-00337 Page 13 c) There are no schools located within 25 mile of the protect site The project site is located about 50 mile from Los Amigos Elementary School, the nearest existing school The proposed building to be constructed is a carwash These types of business generally do not generate hazardous wastes or materials No impacts are anticipated d) The proposed protect is not listed as a hazardous waste or substance materials site Recent site inspection did not reveal the presence of discarded drums or illegal dumping of hazardous materials No impact is anticipated e) The site is not located within an airport land use plan and is not within 2 miles of a public airport The protect site is located approximately 2 5 miles northeasterly of the Ontario Airport and is offset north of the flight path No impact is anticipated f) The nearest private airstrip, Cable Airport, is located approximately 2 5 miles to the west of the City's westerly limits No impact is anticipated g) The City's Multi-Hazard Disaster Plan, which is updated every two years, includes policies and procedures to be administered by the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District in the event of a disaster Because the project includes at least two points of public street access and is required to comply with all applicable City codes, including local fire ordinances, no adverse impacts are anticipated h) Rancho Cucamonga faces the greatest ongoing threat from awind-driven fire in the Urban Wildland Interface area found in the northern part of the City according to the Fire District Strategic Plan 2000-2005, however, the proposed protect site is not located within a high fire hazard area according to General Plan Exhibit V-7 • • 8 HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY Would the protect a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge () () (/) ( ) requiremerits~ b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere () () () (/) substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e g ,the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted) c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the () () () (/) site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner, which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the () () () (/) site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner, which would result in flooding on- or off-site e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed () () () (/) the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality () () () (/) F&G-44 Initial Study for Conditional Use Permit DRC2006-00337 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 14 g) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as () () () (/) mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation maps h) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures () () () (/) that would impede or redirect flood flows i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of () () () (/) loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or damp ~) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow~ () () () (/) Comments a) Water and sewer service is provided by the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD) The project is designed to connect to existing water and sewer systems The State of California is authorized to administer various aspects of the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit under Section 402 of the Clean Water Act The General Construction Permit treats any construction activity over 1 acre as an industrial activity, requiring a permit under the State's General NPDES permit The State Water Resource Control Board (SWRCB) through the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWOCB), Santa Ana Region, administers these permits • Construction activities covered under the State's General Construction permit include removal of vegetation, grading, excavating, or any other activity for new development or significant redevelopment Prior to commencement of construction of a project, a discharger must submit a Notice of Intent (NOI) to obtain coverage under the General • Permit The General permit requires all dischargers to comply with the following during construction activities, including site clearance and grading Develop and implement a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) that would specify Best Management Practices (BMPs) that would prevent construction pollutants from contacting storm water and with the intent of keeping ail products of erosion from moving off-site into receiving waters Eliminate or reduce non-storm water discharges to storm sewer systems and other waters of the nation Perform inspections of all BMPs Waste discharges include discharges of storm water and construction project discharges A construction project for new development or significant redevelopment requires an NPDES permit Construction project proponents are required to prepare a SWPPP To comply with the NPDES, the construction contractor of the project will be required to prepare a SWPPP during construction activities, and a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) for post-construction operational management of storm water runoff The applicant has submitted a WQMP, prepared by Wright Mapping, Inc on March 30, 2007, that identifies Best Management Practices (BMPs) to minimize the amount of pollutants, such as eroded soils, entering the drainage system after construction Runoff from driveways, roads, and other impermeable surfaces must be controlled through an on-site drainage system BMPs include both structural and non-structural control methods Structural controls used to manage storm water pollutant levels include detention basins, oil/grit separators, and porous pavement Non-structural controls focus on controlling pollutants at the source, generally through implementing erosion and sediment control plans, and various business plans that must be developed by any businesses that store and use hazardous materials Practices, such as periodic parking lot sweeping can • F&G-45 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Conditional Use Permit DRC2006-00337 Page 15 • substantially reduce the amount of pollutants entering the storm drain system The following mitigation measures would be required to control additional storm water effluent Construction Activities 1) Prior to issuance of grading permits, the permit applicant shall submit to Building Official for approval a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP), specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs), that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical 2) An erosion control plan shall be prepared, included in the grading plan, and implemented for the proposed project that identifies specific measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading This erosion control plan shall include the following measures at a minimum a) Speafy the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-site as a result of this project will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame 3) During construction, temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff • 4) During construction, to remove pollutants, street cleaning will be performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site 5) The applicant shall implement additional BMPs as outlined in the Water Gluality Management Plan (WQMP) prepared by Wright Mapping, Inc on February 12, 2007 (with subsequent revisions) Post- Construction Operational 6) The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in the WQMP prepared by Wright Mapping, Inc on February 12, 2007, (with subsequent revisions) to reduce pollutants after construction entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical 7) Landscaping plans shall include provisions for controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permits b) According to CVWD, 43 percent of the City's water is currently provided from groundwater in the Cucamonga and Chino Basins CVWD has adopted a master plan that estimates demand needs until the year 2030 The proposed protect will not deplete groundwater supplies, nor will it interfere with recharge because it is not within an area designated as a • recharge basin or spreading ground according to General Plan Exhibit IV-2 The development of the site will require the grading of the site and excavation, however, would not affect the existing aquifer, estimated to be about 288 to 470 feet below the ground surface As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 9), continued development F&G-46 Initial Study for Conditional Use Permit DRC2006-00337 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 16 citywide will increase water needs and is a significant impact, however, CVWD has plans • to meet this increased need through the construction of future water facilities c) The entire protect site area that is not covered by buildings is currently paved with asphalt The new construction and addition of required improvements including landscaping will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff, however, the protect will not alter the course of any stream or river All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows and absorbed within the new landscaped areas that were previously asphalt paved surfaces The protect design includes landscaping of all non-hardscape areas to prevent erosion A grading and drainage plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits Therefore, the protect will not result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site The impact is not considered significant d) The entire protect site area that is not covered by buildings is currently paved with asphalt The new construction and addition of required improvements including landscaping will cause changes m absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff, however, the protect will not alter the course of any stream or river All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows and absorbed within the new landscaped areas that were previously asphalt paved surfaces A grading and drainage plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits Therefore, increase in runoff from the site will not result in flooding on- or off-site No impacts are anticipated e) The entire protect site area that is not covered by buildings is currently paved with asphalt The new construction and addition of required improvements including landscaping will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface • water runoff, however, all runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows and absorbed within the new landscaped areas that were previously asphalt paved surfaces The protect will not result in substantial additional sources of polluted runoff A grading and drainage plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits Therefore, increase in runoff from the site will not result in flooding on- or off-site No impacts are anticipated f) Grading activities associated with the construction period could result in a temporary increase in the amount of suspended solids in surface flows during a concurrent storm event, thus resulting in surface water quality impacts The site is for new development or significant redevelopment, therefore, is required to comply with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) to minimize water pollution The following mitigation measures shall be implemented 8) Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Engineer for approval of a WOMP, including a protect description and identifying BMPs that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable The WOMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004 9) Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, the applicant shall obtain a Nonce of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm • Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board Evidence that this has been obtained (i e , a copy of the Waste D~scharger's Identification F & G- 47 • Initial Study for Conditional Use Permit DRC2006-00337 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 17 Number) shall be submitted to the City Building Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit g) No housing units are proposed with this project No adverse impacts are expected h) The project site is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Exhibit V-5 No adverse impacts are expected The Rancho Cucamonga area is flood protected by an extensive storm drain system designed to convey a 100-year storm event The system is substantially improved and provides an integrated approach for regional and local drainage flows This existing system includes several debris dams and levees north of the City, spreading grounds, concrete-lined channels, and underground storm drains as shown in General Plan Exhibit V-6 The project site is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Exhibit V-5 No adverse impacts are expected ~) There are no oceans, lakes, or reservoirs near the project site, therefore, impacts from seiche and tsunami are not anticipated The Rancho Cucamonga area sits at the base of the steep eastern San Gabriel Mountains whose deep canyons were cut by mountain streams Numerous man-made controls have been constructed to reduce the mudflow impacts to the level of non-significance within the City This existing system includes several debris dams and levees north of the City, and spreading grounds both within and north of the City • 9 LAND USE AND PLANNING Would the project a) Physically divide an established community () () () (/) b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or () () () (/) regulation of an agency with furisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to, a general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan () () () (/) or natural community conservation plan Comments a) The site is located at the southeast corner of Grove Avenue and Arrow Route and is surrounded by a variety of land uses To the east are legally non-conforming single-family residences To the north is a mini-market and additional legally non-conforming single-family residences To the south is vacant land This project will replace an existing auto body repair shop while the existing auto repair shop will remain The protect will continue to be a part of the larger community No adverse impacts are anticipated b) The project site land use designation is General Commercial The proposed protect is consistent with the General Plan and does not interfere with any policies for environmental protection As such, no impacts are anticipated • c) The site is located at the southeast corner of Grove Avenue and Arrow Route and is surrounded by a variety of land uses To the east are legally non-conforming single-family residences To the north is a mini-market and additional legally non-conforming single-family residences To the south is vacant land The site is developed with commercial automotive-related uses and has been disrupted during construction of infrastructure and surrounding developments According to the General Pian Exhibit IV-3, and Section 5 3 of the General Plan FEIR, the project site is not within an area of a F&G-48 Initial Study for Conditional Use Permit DRC2006-00337 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 18 sensitive biological resources Therefore, development of the site will not affect any sensitive biological resources 10 MINERAL RESOURCES Would the project a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral () () () (/) resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the State b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally important () () () (/) mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan Comments a) The site is not designated as a State Aggregate Resources Area according to the City General Plan, Figure IV-1 and Table IV-1, therefore, there is no impact b) The site is not designated by the General Plan, Figure IV 1 and Table IV-1, as a valuable mineral resource recovery site, therefore, there is no impact 11 NOISE Would the project result m a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in () () (/) ( ) excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive () () () (/) ground borne vibration or ground borne noise levels c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise () () () (/) levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the pro~ect~ d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in () (/) () ( ) ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the pro~ect~ e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, () () () (/) where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, () () () (/) would the project expose people residing or working in the protect area to excessive noise levels Comments a) The project site is within an area of noise levels exceeding City standards according to General Plan Exhibit V-13 at build-out However, no adverse impact expected as the project replaces an existing automotive-related facility and there are no residences proposed b) The proposed project is a carwash The City's Development Code requires that all uses be conducted within an enclosed building As the proposed use involves some outdoor activity and there will be equipment operating within the carwash tunnel, a sound study was required Based on the conclusions prepared by VSA and Associates, August 11, 2006, there will be no adverse impacts because of the operations of the • • F & G- 49 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Conditional Use Permit DRC2006-00337 Page 19 • facility Of note is that the vacuum areas will be located between the proposed building and the existing building on the east side of the site thereby serving as an acoustic screen shielding the residences to the west and east The residences to the west do not front along the street and are screened from the protect site by a wall at least 6 feet in height Furthermore, the carwash tunnel is aligned north to south so that the openings of the tunnel are "aimed" towards the commercial zoned properties to the north and south which have a higher threshold of noise impacts Finally, the hours of operation will be limited to no earlier than 8 30 a m and no later than 7 00 p m c) The primary source of ambient noise levels in Rancho Cucamonga is traffic The proposed activities will not significantly increase traffic, hence, are not anticipated to increase the ambient noise levels within the vicinity of the protect d) The General Plan FEIR (Section 5 7) indicates that during a construction phase, on-site stationary sources, heavy-duty construction vehicles, and construction equipment, will generate noise exceeding City standards The following measures are provided to mitigate the short-term noise impacts 1) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday 2) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17 02 120-D, as measured at the property line The developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17 02 120 Monitoring at other times may be required by the Building Official Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building Official within 24 hours, however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building Official If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced m intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted 3) The perimeter block wall shall be constructed as early as possible in first phase The preceding mitigation measures will reduce the disturbance created by on-site construction equipment, however, do not address the potential impacts because of the transport of construction materials and debris The following mitigation measures shall then be required 4) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings e) The site is not located within an airport land use plan and is not within 2 miles of a public airport The site is located approximately 2 5 miles northerly of the Ontario Airport and is offset north of the flight path No impact is anticipated f) The nearest private airstrip, Cable Airport, is located approximately 2 5 miles to the west of the City's westerly limits No impact is anticipated F&G-50 Initial Study for Conditional Use Permit DRC2006-00337 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 20 12 POPULATION AND HOUSING Would the protect a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either () () () (/) directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure) b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, () () () (/) necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating () () () (/) the construction of replacement housing elsewhere Comments a) The project is located in a predominantly developed area and will not induce population growth Construction activities at the site will be short-term and will not attract new employees to the area Once constructed, the proposed protect will have a limited number of employees, hence, will not create a demand for additional housing as a majority of the employees will likely be hired from within the City or surrounding communities No impacts are anticipated b) The project site contains no existing housing units No adverse impact expected c) The project site is developed land that was used for commercial purposes No impacts are anticipated 13 PUBLIC SERVICES Would the project result rn substantial adverse physical rmpacis associated with the provision of new or physrcally altered governmental facilities, need for new or physrcally altered governmental facrlrtres, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance ob~ectrves for any of the public services a) Fire protections O O O (/) b) Police protections () () () (/) c) Schools () () () (/) d) Parks () () () (/) e) Other public facilities O O O (/) Comments a) The site is located at the southeast corner of Grove Avenue and Arrow Route and would be served by Fire Station #3, located approximately 2 miles east-northeast from the project site at 9612 San Bernardino Road The project will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities Standard conditions of approval from the Uniform Building and Fire Codes will be placed on the project so no impacts to fire services will occur No impacts are anticipated b) Additional police protection is not required as the addition of the project will not change the pattern of uses within the surrounding area and will not have a substantial increase in property to be patrolled as the project site is within an area that is regularly patrolled • • • F&G-51 r~ ~. Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Conditional Use Permit DRC2006-00337 Page 21 c) The site is in a developed area currently served by the Cucamonga School District and the Chaffey Joint Union High School District The protect will be required to pay school fees as prescribed by State law prior to the issuance of building permits No impacts are anticipated d) The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga The nearest park, Red Hili Community Park, is located about 1 25 mile from the protect site to the northeast The protect will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities A standard condition of approval will require the developer to pay park development fees No impacts are anticipated e) The proposed protect will utilize existing public facilities The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga The protect will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new faalities Cumulative development within Rancho Cucamonga will increase demand for library services According to the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 9 9), the protected increase in library space under the General Plan will not meet the protected demand The General Plan FEIR identified the cumulative impact on library services as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Sfatement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council The proposed protect is consistent with the General Plan for which the EIR was prepared and impacts evaluated Since the adoption of the General Plan, the City built a new library within the Victoria Gardens regional shopping center of approximately 22 000 square feet, which is in excess of the protected need of 15,500 square feet at build-out of the City • 14 RECREATION Would the project a) Increase the use of existing neighborhood and () () () (/) regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated b) Does the protect include recreational facilities or () () () (/) require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities, which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment Comments a) The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga The nearest park, Red Hill Community Park, is located about 1 25 miles from the protect site to the north/northeast This protect is not proposing any new housing or large employment generator that would cause an increase in the use of parks or other recreational facilities A standard condition of approval will require the developer to pay park development fees No impacts are anticipated b) See a) response above • F & G-52 Initial Study for Conditional Use Permit DRC2006-00337 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 22 15 TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC Would the project a) Cause an increase in traffic, which is substantial in () () () (/) relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (i e , result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections) b) Exceed, either rndividualiy or cumulatively, a level of O O O (/) service standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including () () () (/) either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature () () () (/) (e g , sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e g ,farm equipment) ~ e) Result in inadequate emergency access () () () (/) f) Result in inadequate parking capacity () () () (/) g) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs () () (} (/) supporting alternative transportation (e g , bus turnouts, bicycle racks) Comments a) Implementation of the proposed protect will generate 1,080 vehicle trips daily The proposed protect is a 3,300 square foot car wash and will have a wash tunnel and 10 drying stalls As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 5), continued development will contribute to the traffic load in the Rancho Cucamonga area The proposed protect is consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated The protect is m an area that is mostly developed with street improvements existing or included in protect design The protect wilt not create a substantial increase in the number of vehicle trips, traffic volume, or congestion at intersections The protect site will be required to provide street improvements (curb, gutter, and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site per City roadway standards In addition, the City has established a Transportation Development fee that must be paid by the applicant prior to issuance of building permits Fees are used to fund roadway improvements necessary to support adequate traffic circulation No impacts are anticipated b) The Rancho Cucamonga Traffic Model estimates that each stall will generate 4 8 two-way peak hour trips daily In November 2004, San Bernardino County voters passed the Measure I extension which requires local Jurisdictions to impose appropriate fees on development for their fair share toward regional transportation improvement protects On May 18, 2005, the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted a Comprehensive Transportation Fee Schedule updating these development impact fees As a result, the San Bernardino County Congestion Management Agency waived the Congestion Management Plan (CMP) Traffic Impact Analysis reporting requirement This protect will be required, as a condition of approval, to pay the adopted transpartation development fee prior to issuance of building permits The protect is in an area that is mostly developed with all street improvements existing The protect will not negatively impact the level of service standards on adtacent arterials The protect will be required to provide street improvements (curb, gutter, and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site No impacts are anticipated • • • F&G-53 ., Initial Study for Conditional Use Permit DRC2006-00337 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 23 c) Located approximately 2 5 miles northerly of the Ontario Airport, the site is offset north of the flight path and will not change air traffic patterns No impacts are anticipated d) The project is in an area that is mostly developed The project will be required to provide street improvements (curb, gutter, and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site The project design does not include any sharp curves or dangerous intersections or farming uses The project will, therefore, not create a substantial increase in hazards because of a design feature No impacts are anticipated e) The protect will be designed to provide access for all emergency vehicles and will, therefore, not create an inadequate emergency access No impacts are anticipated f) The project design has adequate parking in compliance with standards of the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code and will, therefore, not create an inadequate parking capacity No impacts are anticipated g) The project design includes, or the project will be conditioned to provide, features supporting transportation and vehicle trip reduction (e g ,bus bays, bicycle racks, carpool parking, etc ) • 16 UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS Would the project a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the () () () (/) applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board b) Require or result in the construction of new water or () () () (/) wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects c) Require or result in the construction of new storm () () () (/) water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the () () () (/) project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment () () () (/) provider, which serves or may serve the project, that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted () () () (/) capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs g) Comply with Federal, State, and local statutes and () () () (/) regulations related to solid waste Comments • a) The proposed project is served by the CVWD sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga The project is required to meet the requirements of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board regarding wastewater No impacts are anticipated F&G-54 Initial Study for Conditional Use Permit DRC2006-00337 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 24 b) The proposed project is served by the CVWD sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga and RP-1 located within City of Ontario, neither of which are at capacity The project is required to meet the requirements of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board regarding wastewater No impacts are antiapated c) All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows A grading and drainage plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits The impact is not considered significant d) The project is served by the CVWD water system There is currently a sufficient water supply available to the City of Rancho Cucamonga to serve this project No impacts are anticipated e) The proposed project is served by the CVWD sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga and RP-1 located within City of Ontario, neither of which is at capacity No impacts are anticipated f) Solid waste disposal will be provided by the current City contracted hauler who disposes the refuse at a permitted landfill with sufficient capacity to handle the City's solid waste disposal needs g) This project complies with Federal, State, and local statutes and regulations regarding solid waste The City of Rancho Cucamonga continues to implement waste reduction procedures consistent with AB 939 Therefore, no impacts are anticipated 17 MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the () () () (/) quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the mayor periods of California history or prehistory b) Does the project have impacts that are individually () () () (/) limited, but cumulatively considerable ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future pro~ects)~ c) Does the project have environmental effects that will () () () (/) cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly Comments a) The site is located at the southeast corner of Grove Avenue and Arrow Route and is surrounded by a variety of land uses To the east are legally non-conforming single-family residences To the north is a mini-market and additional legally non-conforming single-family residences To the south is vacant land The site is developed with • • F & G- 55 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Conditional Use Permit DRC2006-00337 Page 25 automotive-related uses and has been previously disrupted during construction of infrastructure and surrounding developments According to the General Plan Exhibit IV-3, and Section 5 3 of the General Plan FEIR, the project site is not within an area of a sensitive biological resources Therefore, development of the site will not affect any sensitive biological resources b) If the proposed project were approved, then the applicant would be required to develop the site in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Pian The 2001 General Plan was adopted along with the certification of a Program FEIR, Findings of Fact, and a Statement of Overriding Considerations for significant adverse environmental effects of build-out in the City and Sphere-of-Influence The City made findings that adoption of the General Plan would result in significant adverse effects to aggregate resources, prime farmland, air quality, the acoustical environment, library services, and aesthetics and visual resources Mitigation measures were adopted for each of these resources, however, they would not reduce impacts to less than significant levels As such, the City adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations balancing the benefits of development under the General Plan Update against the significant unavoidable adverse impacts (CEQA Guidelines Section 15092 and 15096(h)) These benefits include less overall traffic volumes by developing mixed-use projects that will be pedestrian friendly and conservation of valuable natural open space With these findings and the Statement of Overriding Considerations, no further discussion or evaluation of cumulative impacts is required c) Development of the site under the proposed land use change would not cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly The Initial Study identifies construction-related emissions of criteria pollutants as having a potentially significant • impact Proposed mitigation measures would further reduce emission levels Additionally, impacts resulting from air quality would be short-term and would cease once construction activities were completed The Initial Study identified potentially significant impacts associated with the exposure of people to increased noise levels Mitigation measures contained in this Initial Study will ensure impacts are at less-than-significant levels EARLIER ANALYSES Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or Negative Declaration per Section 15063(c)(3)(D) The effects identified above for this project were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in the following earlier document(s) pursuant to applicable legal standards, and such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis The following earlier analyses were utilized in completing this Initial Study and are available for review in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Department offices, 10500 Civic Center Drive (/) General Plan FEIR (SCH#2000061027, Certified October 17, 2001) (/) Master Environmental Assessment for the 1989 General Plan Update (SCH #88020115, certified January 4, 1989) (/) Noise Study (VSA n Associates, August 11, 2006) (/) Water Quality Management Plan (Wright Mapping, Inc ,February 12, 2007) • F & G-56 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Conditional Use Permit DRC2006-00337 Page 26 APPLICANT CERTIFICATION I certify that I am the applicant for the protect described in this Initial Study I acknowledge that I have read this Initial Study and the proposed mitigation measures Further, I have revised the protect plans or proposals and/or hereby agree to the proposed mitigation measures to avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant environmental effects would occur Applicant's Signature Print Name and Title Date • • F & G- 57 • City of Rancho Cucamonga MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM Project File No Conditional Use Permit DRC2006-00337 This Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP) has been prepared for use in implementing the mitigation measures identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration fortheabove-listed project This program has been prepared in compliance with State law to ensure that adopted mitigation measures are implemented (Section 21081 6 of the Public Resources Code) Program Components -This MMP contains the following elements 1 Conditions of approval that act as impact mitigation measures are recorded with the action and the procedure necessary to ensure compliance The mitigation measure conditions of approval are contained in the adopted Resolution of Approval for the project 2 A procedure of compliance and verification has been outlined for each action necessary This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported 3 The MMP has been designed to provide focused, yet flexible guidelines As monitoring progresses, changes to compliance procedures may be necessary based upon recommendations by those responsible for the program Program Management -The MMP will be in place through all phases of the project The project planner, assigned by the Planning Director, shall coordinate enforcement of the MMP The project planner oversees the MMP and reviews the Reporting Forms to ensure they are filled out correctly and proper action is taken on each mitigation Each City department shall ensure compliance of the conditions (mitigation) that relate to that department Procedures -The following steps will be followed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga 1 A fee covering all costs and expenses, including any consultants' fees, incurred by the City in performing monitoring or reporting programs shall be charged to the applicant 2 A MMP Reporting Form will be prepared for each potentially significant impact and its corresponding mitigation measure identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Checklist, attached hereto This procedure designates who will take action, what action will betaken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported All monitoring and reporting documentation will be kept in the project file with the department having the original authority for processing the project Reports will be available from the City upon request at the following address City of Rancho Cucamonga -Lead Agency Planning Department 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 F&G-58 Mitigation Monitoring Program Conditional Use Permit DRC2006-00337 Page 2 3 Appropriate specialists will be retained if technical expertise beyond the City staff's is needed, as determined by the project planner or responsible City department, to monitor specific mitigation activities and provide appropriate written approvals to the project planner 4 The project planner or responsible City department will approve, by signature and date, the completion of each action item that was identified on the MMP Reporting Form After each measure is verified for compliance, no further action is required for the specific phase of development 5 All MMP Reporting Forms for an impact issue requiring no further monitoring will be signed off as completed by the project planner or responsible City department at the bottom of the MMP Reporting Form 6 Unanticipated circumstances may arise requiring the refinement or addition of mitigation measures The project planner is responsible for approving any such refinements or additions An MMP Report~~~g Form will be completed by the project planner or responsible City department and a copy provided to the appropriate design, construction, or operational personnel 7 The project planner or responsible City department has the authority to stop the work of construction contractors if compliance with any aspects of the MMP is not occurring after written notification has been issued The protect planner or responsible City department also has the authority to hold certificates of occupancies if compliance with a mitigation measure attached hereto is not occurring The protect planner or responsible City department has the authority to hold issuance of a business license until all mitigation measures are implemented 8 Any conditions (mitigation) that require monitoring after project completion shall be the responsibility of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division The Division shall require the applicant to post any necessary funds (or other forms of guarantee) with the City These funds shall be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measure for the required period of time 9 In those instances requiring long-term project monitoring, the applicant shall provide the City with a plan for monitoring the mitigation activities at the project site and reporting the monitoring results to the City Said plan shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented The monitoring/reporting plan shall conform to the City's MMP and shall be approved by the Community Development Director or Planning Director prior to the issuance of building permits • F & G-59 • ., • a 0 J _Q Z ~"' _~ J Y W 2 U Z 0 Z O Q G i r.+ i t _U m i O til 0 0 N O U Q ~ Q. ~E Q 0 M 0 N N .C N z a~ LL V ~_ a .fl L L a ~a ++ v ~ v v _ N N N N N N sw U U U U U a U a a a a N ~ Q Q Q ~ Q 9! O O O O O O ~ N ~ N N N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .. • U U U m U U „z O m ~ d d m m m O ~ O ~ ~ ~ L '" ~ ~ O ~ U O "~ ~ - ~ M O ~ ~ c~ ~ ~ ~ ~o ~~ oU .- U ~ > ~ ~ o ~ ~U ~T-~ ~ .c ~' °oU ~ ~ `o °oo° o° ~' o Q a d xr ~ ~ U c o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N i ~ ° m ~ U ~ ~ o o ~ ~~' ~ oQ- m ° ~ o o~~ ° ~ ° ~ ~ ~ ~ N c ` a~~ u~ ° ~ ~ ° ~ ~ ~ m ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ c ~ ~ 'a ~ C O C C c~ O ( >` ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ C Q O~ .-. O~ O~ ~ ~ t O d ~ ctS ~ >. O p U _ ~ E ~ U ~ - U ~ ~ ~ ~ ~, ~ ~ p ~ C ~ O ~ O L L O C ~ .--, ~ .-• ~ U ~/~ N ~ ~ >' O .~~. U (n ~ ~ V ~ Q f... ~ ~ ~ ~ - V/ ~ ~ ~' ~ ~ O ~~ C~ p 0 C y U U C O~ p (f) ~ cn C~ ~ ~ c~ O C ~ ~' O ~ U ~ ~ N cn (~ ~~ O~ Q O ~ O O~ ~ N p ~ .~ O O ~ ~ U r 0 0~ N _ O O ~ U ~ ~ ~ (n p ~ N 0 ~ O ~ C C (O p ~ r C Q > O ~ ~ Q ~ ~ ~ Q ~ ~ U ~ O in ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N ~ O O p Q O- ~ c~ ~ C CJ Q In O C ~ fl- C ~ 7 (~ -O C co 0 0 0 0 0 +- ~ (SS (~ ~ '~ Q N ~ O j ~ ~ C p ~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ 0 N ~ ~ Q U .Q •~ - t_n ~ ~ ~ C C D E _ ~ ~ N ~ C ~ - ~ ~ ~ O ~ C ~ ~ c~ ~ co ~ ~ O- ~ , ~ ~ p ~ c0 d CO ~ O u7 N U~~~> ~ ~ ~ O ~~~~~~~ ~~~ N ~ ~U~ - ~¢ U ~o ~ ~~ >, •~ C ~ O O ~ ~ ~ N ~ N ~ ~ O ~ O ~ C ~ C C ~ ~ N N ` ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ j C O N ~ C ~ ~ E C~ ~ ~ O O CA O O O C~ O1 ~ p ~ E C E ~ C~ 7 ~ ~ RS E ~ ~ Q ~ , - ~ ~ N 7 ~ ~ Q °`~~ °_-E- ~ a~oQ-ago-in~~nc~c ao ~ v~~ o~~ p s (rte '- . _ U N 7 i (0 - - aE o-a~ c a~ ~> C C~ 7 N C RS C C m o a-> ~> o m c~ c~ i C .C - ° ~ o> (~ O - o U - ~ U Q . Q o m m Q~ > ~~-o a~ m m ~U E~~ Q Q~~ ¢ c QOC ~ F&G-60 0 T . . ~r v ~ v N N N rY c1' ~ V' V ~ ~' N ' a a a Q Q Q Q Q Q a s C C C C C C ctS ~ (~ Q_ (~ ~ c~ ~ O O ~ ~ O O c~ _Q' c~ n' O O O O U U U U U O O > ~ ~ ~ i Q) i ~ .... D) i 01 i ~ N N N C~ C N C (n C~ C~ ~ ~ N N N O ~ ~ 7 ~ 7 0 ~ ~ 7 ~ N O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ U ~ U ~ U ~ U ~ U ~ ~ • • U U U U U U U U U U U O O O O O O O O O O O m m m m m m m m m m m U ~ O C~ ~ U_ ~ O L O ~ i O "O ~+ C L C ~ - N C O C O ""' C c~ s' L O cd O -O ~ 7 L L O - ctS O ~ ~- ~ L ~ "~ O ( ctS "O ~ O C c~ .--. O U N U O ~ In ~ p E C N C p (SS f~ N O N Q- ~~ L >, N O "O C C O ~ _ L i m N ~ Q O ~~ E O~ ~ L O .~ .«- 0 O L ~ ~ p .~ O O ~ ~ to O U ~ O ~ O ~ ~ ai c C 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ 'O O O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ _~ ~ ~ ~ U O Cn ~ ~ ~ ~ C L ~ ~ L O ~ f6 ~ O ~ L ~ (0 ~ O (~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ O C ~ p cU cd p L ..y ~ O ~ ~ "-' p ~ ~ ~ c0 L - nl ~ ~ ~ O ~ ~ cn "O N >~ ~ p~~ 7 L C 7 N co L O `-' O p N~ CO C O N C C ~ C C X C N "~ (d ~ ~~ ~ O E ~ C ~ L (~ 0 O - "--' ~ p ~~ O O Rj ~ Q C~ ~ Q ~ ~ L O? (~ O C j ~ 'L3 ~ ~ N N ~ ~ ~ N 7 0 ~ >, -O O ~ ~ ~ O O_ ,-, L fn ~ U ~ C ~ ~ ~~ ~~ C ct5 cn ~ V U Q ~~~ N Q a O (~ U O~ ~ co m ~> O N U c~ C c E ~ _ Q p ~~ ~ ~~ O~ O O > +`-~ ~ j O ~ N Q co ~ ~~ ~ Q Q ~ ~ C N~ '_' ~ In L U ~ +_ `O i' O ~ U ~ ~ ~ O U U C CSY ~U-, ~ N (~ ~ O C N O ~ Q' N O) O ~ >> C_6 ~ ~ ~ ~ » > C x U N O L O C ~ ~ ~ L N C y ~ L f0 ~ C C ~ O Q_ ~ O ~ c ~ O ~ N O O ~ ~ _ N O ~ ~ cS5 c6 O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ CO E d ~ O - - L ~ O ,~ ~' - c~ ~ O C O_ ~ N ~ 7 ~ ~ 0 N ~ c ~ .~ ~ N C B ~ L o O U~ .`-. O N ~ ~ ~ O_ O ~ O Q N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i Q _N ?~ ~ ~ O ~ ~ _ ~ O ~ ~ O N ~ N~ O O H p_ O~ N~ O~ y C O E Q. -a ~ 7 C _ . C c~ ~ C .r ~ L crf U~ Cn C6 C 7 ~ m L d- CJ U .--~ C? O U U i ~ .C ~ ~ c~ U ~ O Cn O 2i ~ U ~ O ct7 O _ ~ >, Cn ~ ~ H OU U Cn ~ (/) ~ L vOi ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ ~ O ~ ~ O ~ ~ ~ p ~ O ° ~ ~ ~ ~ U ~ a ~ ~ ~ O ~ ° v c n c • ~ • O N • F&G-61 • • . . . M M C\7 d` ~ _ V ~ ~ d' N N N N N c*~ M c7 . ' Q a o o U U a a a C C C C C ~, C CiS «~ (~ Ci3 co c~ _ Q ~ Q ~ Q. ~ n. a a a a Q • 0 0 0 0 0 0 _ 0 0 0 m o m m m o a~ m m a~ a~ a~ o m m m a~ o • U U U U U U U U U . • • ~ O O O m m m m a ~ ~ m m ~ o te a . a . ~ -~ C O m ~ -o O C ~ o O N '"' m ~ L C ~ m -a L C m __ C ~- a~ ~~ O O L -p c ~ 0 0 "- m ~ e~ L ~ ~~ O C O c~ ~ i[' ~~ N Ln ~ _N ~ ~ (6 ~ O (~ L ~ C N ~ N ~ o O ~ ~ l L ~ L ~ ~ ctf ~ Q .~ c~ ~n y ~ p N O = U O ~ O O ~ C U ~ ~ .~ ~ O ~ L ~ c~ QQ i ~ - ~L ~_~V O cn ~ O ~ cn C .- N C aU RS 7 > O C p~ O O -O to +- O ~ - N _ O ~ ~ L ~~ U ~ C~ O Y p~ O C~ ~ c ~ N ~~ O O U O~ C cn ~ ` to O C E N O ~ to ~ ~ C ~ ~ ~ N ~ ~ U C C U ..O O ~ ~ O ~ In ~ S O C U ~ ~ to ~ 7 O fn - .-~ p-O ~ ~ O C Q ~ CLS C O O _ ~" j C C c~ ~ O 7 C ~ ~ C~~ CS ~ U ~O 7 C >, ~ U~ C fn (~ O U ~ ~ ~ 7 ~ ~ . 0 N ~ N~ ~ U (~ '~ (n Q V C~~ O U ~ ~ ~ C U Q ~ R3 N U V V H C V ~ to O 0 to ~ p to C O U cS3 N C __ ~~ ~~ 0 0 O p~ ~ L p) N O y u p Q ~~ _ L O ~ oO ~ a ~ a'~- c4 ~~~ Q O O O ~ O ~ ~~ ~ ~ O ~ QN ~ Q i C r i C ~ C `- C In C ~ C C L Q ~ L .--. ~ ~ ~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ CO '-' ~ N O- N~ O p 0 ~ N .C C c~ ~ i O Q 7 C +-, C L ~ m ~ ~ U ~ p) U L ~ U cn O ~ ~ d O ~ Q. ~ ~ N ~ c~ ~ U ~ ~ ~ > ~ O Q ~ L -p ~ O _O L ~~ C '~ ~ 'a O c~ O~ c~ O~ U O _O _O Y~ L ' " ~ ~_ ~ O U_ O C ~ U 7 U C +- C ~ (~ CLS Q (i3 0 0 L > Cd p 0~ ?, L c~ C C co O C c0 Q ~ p " O N~ L .O .~ ~ «= i ~ D E C O D O O co ~ '~ ~ 0 0 ~ L N cd - , c~ O U _ co ~ to ~ C O ~. .~ C O _ ..r ~ ~ ~ c~ _OLp. ~ Q ~ ~ ~ O ~ O ~ D_ O ~ O O in ~ " in ~ in Q Y in ~ ~ C -p ~ ~ .~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ to O ~ U O ~ ~ ~ ~ O U ~ ~ ~ "6 i ~ -O ~ ~ -O O O N ~ ~ -O ~ X ~ ~_ ~ ~ _~ L ~ c~ O > O C 7 C O C~ L L c~ C ~ ~ C O O C O " ~ L C C C O C O C O C O i N L O '-' p +-~ (~ O > cn L Lll to ~ CSS U d ~ ~ (6 - a" ~ Q ~ O _- N Q O -_ O ~ Q ~ ~ -_ O Q O Q ~ O L -_ O' N C Q ~ -_ ~ O Q ~ ~ ~ U C ~ U ~ i _ O ~ ~ O ~ _ _ . i ( _ ( ^ ^ ^ O c'7 F&G-62 c 1 C~7 d' ~ ~ M 'a a a a s o i O a O Q O ~ O a O a o ~ m a~ a~ m ~ a~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ m a~ a~ a~ a~ a~ > > > > > > ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ U U U m m m ~ O m o ~ ~ o O ~ ~ ~ a. ~ m a ~ U~ Q O U' •-% "O U L ~ C N C N CLS L p~ cn -p O .O O L ~ "' N ~ N N O L N ~ ~~ C ~ O ~ (If O Q. ~ ~ ~ 7 C - ~ .-• C ~ O ~ (~ >. ~ a--~ ~ ~ ,--~ .~ ,~, CO ~ CLS >_ ~ fn ~ ~ O- O U ~ - O- p U ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Q ~ ~ O ~ ~ ~ O O U (~ RS ~ ~ ~ C C O -O ~ c N ~ ~ N ~ Q O c L O C~~U ~ ~ ~ O ~ ~ Q ~ O w .~ ..., ~ ~ N ~ ~ O ~ ~ ~ O ~ N O c~ ~ .,., m O ~ Q ~ ~ ~ C ~ "O N O ~ L ~ in ~ ~ ~ N ~- ~ to E L ~ Q ~ „_, ~ U p (~ O m p co ~ L C ~ - " ~ ~ (~ C O 5 O ~ c ~ ~ O7 - N ~ O O ~ N c~ N ~ Q ~ ~ C N Q. N ~ ~ ~~ m ~ ~ ~ L ..- O O~ C QF" ~ mt' O ~ > ~ ~ C O c~ O O ~ O U E i U ~ _ ~ N to C `p 01 N C C ~ O O C O ~ i U 6 ~ i 0 0~ L C C p O O Q >, "_' -~ O O C O E~ C ~~ ~ n ~ .~ ~ O C ~ O '- O ~ i- O_ N ~ ~ ~ ~ ( U V ~ p L ~ C U ~ O- RS ~ ~ c~ ~ ~ '~ ~ "O c~ ~ C ~ L ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O O ~ >' ~ N O c6 _ N O O C O N ~ O O ~ O~ O '- O ~ O p ~ ~ c~ C L ~~ >- ~ ~ U O ~ ~ Q. O L U~ ~ _ ,r ~ _~ O ~ ~ N N L O ~ E +.. C w ~ > cn C >, O ~ O ~ O N to L »_ ~ O C ~ ~ " N "- ~~ ~ p) ~ (d L O O ~ C C Vi >, C ~ ~ U O ~ V vi C O 0~ U O +-~ ~ p C U cn cd O~ (d O C ~ ` 7 ~ "- O O _~ 7 N~ ""' O O "_' C O L O p ~ O E ~ ~ .- O p N ~ O ~ N Q C d ~ O p Q C 7 irs am _ N p U~ O O C c i~ c U co N~ O~~ c0 O~~ -° ~ ~ O~~~ a~ a 0 _ C N~~ O U ~ -a °' c ~~ ~ ~ p ~ c4 ~ O U ~ O ~ ~ o m a~ ~ ~ c O p ~ ; ~ ~ ~ c~ ~ in N ~ «S N ~ O ~ ~ cn ~ ~ c ~ m C O i~ ~ E O C p ~~ E E to ~ O UO N N E Q L 7 7 ~ Q' O ~~ ~ -p 7 O C U O O~ C N ~ p O ~? ~ C N c0 ~ -O L ~ O ~ m c ~ - ~ ~ ~ E O > c~ O ,J O_ c~ -O U O ~ O ~ ~ ~ L U ~ O ~ L O " L ~ U U L-O Q ~ O O O C ~O Qc~ LL ~ 0 0~~ ~ a~ O U O ~ C ~~ p U~ Q ~ C_ ~ ~ c~ p- ~ O p-p cn L y U ~f p Q.~ ~ O C O ~ U O U. ~ ~ ~ 'O Q cd O Q cd >, ~ ~ , ., U C O cn O __ U ~ O Q. ~ , ( Q N ~ -O Cn O O - ~ U / \ ~ "O cd U ^ ^ N~> C O cd O p Q O O ~ O ~ O Q ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ O ^ ^ ^ O • • F&G-63 • • . . ~ __. ~ _ M N ~ ~ ~t ~ N ~ t U Q Q Q Q Q Q a `o O C ~ - Q ~ C C C C Q Y U O O O O _ • O O O U U U U O 3 V Q) ~ D7 i O) ~ CA i ~ ~ C ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ d D U D U D U D U ~ Q U o U U U U U m . . ~ m m m m m m • .°C ~.~ U L C ~.~ o C ~-~ m~ L ~ C~ ca ~o ~ O~ fn ~ ~ ~n C p ~ c o C O O ~ ~ >,~ ago ~`~ L C E O C O U E N O ~ C _ O O O ~ ~ >+ m O O 3 ~ U N Q U O U 7 U ~ ~ ~ tq C ~ Q ~ O Q ~ O ~ U 0 "O U O C O ~ ~ ~ ~ Q in U to ~ cd N ~ ~ ~ p O C E a- ~ N ` U' ~ .L-. Q `O ~ ~ ~ Y"' ~ O d CO O U ~ Q ~ C C -m ~ ~ E' ~ ~ U ~ O C ~ m U N ~ ~ ~ U C a~ U (n O~ o O `- ~~ 7 ..O ttS U a C i C L C ..~ O c~ (n ~ ~ ~ O _~ Q ~ "06 a- ~. +~ O N Q- ~ O O E ~ O N m ~ U p >+ O C y L O O ~ ~ O L c~ L - _ ~~ > > U O_ O O h O C L O c~ O ~ ~_ -~ Q N O C > U N ~ _O co C O O~ N~ O N C O C R O (d ~ E cd C~~ Q O (n c~ O O U ~ O o ~ C L O S O_ O E~ Q O O N U CO +-• ~~ ~ U O .J N -° ~ d ~ O 00 ~ ~ L ~ L O ~ ~ ~ O .~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O C U °~ ~ E ~ ro~ a a.o ~ °~ ~'~ ~ ~ - ro -- > ~ ~ O E m c o ~ ~ . .,... ~ ,~L ~, E ~ i ~ (~ U C6 ~ ~ ~ C Q ~ i ~ fIS (~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N ~ U C y ~ ~ ~~ O "~' U ~ C C }~ ~ O v~ O O) ~ Cn ~ ~ U Q ~ - c~ O co U ~+ D tq L - ~ U ~ ~ ~ C O C ' ~ c L ~ ~ ~ N "O O m ~ > X U C O ~ ~ 0 0~ ~ ~ C ~~ ~ ~ U ~~ ~ _ ~ ~ O O ~ ~ (0 p ~ i o C O O N (~ ~ 7~ j C ,-.. ~ "~ O C~ U - O O D_ N ~ N -_ Q - _ Q O ~ f- 7 Q. U O ~ O N CO ~ ~ (d ~ 0 7 U ~ p ~ ~ cn U L U Q fJ) ~ ~ 7 ~' ~ Q C~ O) (~ E C L m U C ~ O U~ ~ O) ~ O "' ~~ ~~ ~ N C r y U m ~ U O O ~~ C O X ~ U ~ L ~ (~ O U~ U U ~ _ ` ~ -O O O L ~ O rn N ~ C O to ~ O ~ O ~ U' ~n U ~ C~ O 0 ` - O "~ - ~ ^ ~ ~ L F- 'a ~ L _ ~ ~_ ~ F- vOi ~ ~ ~ O L _ U LL u O O O ~ O C7 ~ ~ > L > ~ ~ U ~ ct3 ~ ~ 2 ~ c~ co ~ aS C O ~ LVl > ~ ~ OU 0 F&G-64 N N N N N • ' a a a a a Q a a Q 0 0 0 o n U U U U m m m m m . . m m m U U c-a-o^aoa»o~a~~a>E - a~ c ~ c ~ ~ cn~a~ ca ~-oo c N ' me - c~ cti U c -a>c - U U ~ _ a~i o c o o E m~_ ~_ ~ _ O O O N O ~ p ~~ s ~ ~ ca ~ ~ ~ ~ cn~- ~ ~ ~-~-o O Q c~ o ~ ~a~-° m o ~~ ~ ~ a ~ a~ ~ c o~ ~ ~ c ,.- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Qo o Q-~~ o_~ ~' o o c c ~' o-c ~> c m o °' o c° o - o EE~~~o`E~oo ~ ~a>.._.E EQ ~Q-~in ~ ~ - O - ~'"a'`~~~aoio~~~°-~ O -O ._ Ea~~ O O ~Ec.= - (t3 O cm~in O- to ~nc~cm ~ ca ° ~.oc a,u~ic~a~iU o.c~ o N C ~ •-~ fn Q C'~ +- 7 ~ ~ a~ ~ ~ ° ~ o o Q. fn ~ N _° c~ o -O ~ O ~ °~ ~ m ~ D1 U .-~ N -O Q> O C R O_ C O N QoEE ~ E~ ~~ °~ ~ N ~E O E o ~ o-o "O ~ > c~ .gym L N~ U o m~ ro r ~ ~ o o a c~ oc ~ E c"u~c ~_ o ro~~ ~ oLUO ~~ ~. _ L "~c~a ~E~ a~iocEo~°a`~io M O o~c E E~~~ ~co~aci ~ roc O C "-' ~- E O C ~~ c c N O_ E N O- O ~ O °'~ N ~ ~°-o_ o c c_cln~E ~ E ~ o c U E o o ~ ~ ~ °' c~ a~a> ~ m~ a~vc o E `~ ~,o °" ~~ E a~ ~~a~ n. ~ U c~ ~ to N O O~ C c E~ 0 0 0 ^~ O p - O L~ ~ ~ E N~ 7 a3 '~ .-J O O O in ~ ,~ ctf O . O O ~ ca ~ N c~ O- '= ~, N O _~ N N N C O p~~ N O ,~ ,.. O~ 0 0_ N p) O ) . U~ .fl N U O_ ~ O ~ O ~ L ~~ O O O_ ~ O L N~ U~ ~ Q E p Q~ O~~~~ O C C O O "= N 7~ to ^O O _ N~ O~ C '", ~ o O _ N p _~ O ~ O C O) ~ -O (0 ~ N (~ ~ ~ O `~ - E C O O O ° O_ ~~ ~ ~ O~ " O U O H O c~ ~ ~o o" -o ° g ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ c ~ c ~ a~ c m o ~ m~ mc~ a~ o o ~ c~ ~ ~ a~ m ~ ~ ~~ m U -6 ~ a~ ~~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ca m~ ~ ~ o m ~ ~ i c ~~ ~ ca E ~ ~ O ~ ~ -~ O~ ~ T - ~ N ~ ~ ~ i ~ U CL C (Lf ~ O ~ ~ ~ N ~ ~ ~ c a~ O c cn ~ _ ~ ~ C U ~ p -- Q ~ O_ O 'O m ~ O ~ Q ~ O U ~ O ~ O ~ to -O N ~ O ~ ~ D U c~ Q ~ ~ ~ O H O ~ LL .c O N O >, ~ ~ LL O_ cn • O • CO • F & G- 65 • • . . ~ ~ v ~ _ _ N N N ct ~ -F a a a v Q C C c Q d D.. C O O O - U N ~ N ~` C ~ N N O O C O ~ ~ ~ ~ U • m m m U m m m U O O ~ ~ O ~ O ~ ~ ~ cd ~ r c0 ~ O O ~ ~' C c~ ~ ~ ~ ~_ ~ O O ~ to ~ L~ ~ L~ ~ O F- O ,~ Z ~ . O io O O U O ~~ ~ O C N O (~ C~ ~= ~ C N (d O~ U p) >• ~ O ~ O ~~ U C ~ 0 0~ ~ O ~ > ~ C > .~ m C N OU O N> ~ O~ N C7 O ~ .~ U -O ~ Y ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N ~ C c~ O O ~ O ~ ~ 'Q ~ U ~ m ~ U E O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ C o ~ ~~ ~ o m " Qo a,o ~ o ~~ - A C C "O ~ > aO c~~~O~O O w ~ ~ ~ N C Cn O C Q O Q to O O +L- U N ~ O- ~ O , Q ~ '~ O_ L ~ C D1 Z ~ ~ C ~ ~ L ~ ._ ~ Q O O F, C o > ~z ~~ E U ~ J O ~ ~ ~ ~ C ~ C~ -O O ~ ~ N ~ O Q NO O - ~ O N -O O E-O O O .J N~ -O ~ C L O ~ O_ ~ C O E ~ ". ~ N C ~ O -6 ~ O> Q O O C~ C - E '~ C (SS O O) ~ ~ ~ _ ~ L O C C U C >' Q" l1J „' (~ ~ O ~ (if (LS ~ ~ .Q C ~ ~ y ~ Q ~ C d ~ X ~ ~ j ~ " ~ U N ~ ~ ~ ~ Z Q1 y ~ ~ ~ N c~ O ~ vi ~ ~ O ~ ~ ~ • i O ~ ~ O ~ v L LLJ ~ "~ ~ N ~ ~ c~ O ~ O p ~ ~ U "'' ~ C m U O ~ .~ ~ CSf -O O ~ U CJ N >O O >~ "_' ~ ~ C u~ ~ ~ N i~ L N ~ > ~ ~ O ~ `O E O E O Q t0 Q~~ C~ CSS C O Q ~ U U O C O -O C CiS E .-. ~ C O ~ O C~ Z C~ ~ ~ O~ >' N p) O "O ~ aj _ ~ Q1 O - ~ ~ cU Q ~ c~ ~ LLJ C U N C U C ~ O ~ ~ C~ a 0 O H O -O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ O~ O~ ~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ E U ~ L ~ O ~ O "- O ~ ~ CO p ~ U U U O~ (~ U L C i ~ ~ U- O H O O to O O_ C ~~ C p l N - -O c~ ) ~~ -Q ~ ~~ N~ ~ ~ O C O ~ ~ C c~ C N~ -O .~.. N~ 7 In N~ ~ O ~ to N U E S L C (LS > C L N O - ~ ~ _U U C !n (~ C~ C O Q L O ~ ~ to ~ C j~ J OU ~ L N .'C- E~ O_ d~ C~ -O ~ E ~~ _ d C~ 3 0 U~ O~ CD U Z U L ~ C O F&G-66 • ~ Q ~ Q Q Q ~ O c O c O U ~ i U D1 i U ~ i C ~ C ~ C N C Q O C ~ O C ~ O U U U m ~ CD ~ ~ p~ ,Y C~ C N j"> N~ ~ L 0 0 0~ cd C~ tij -a ~~' m E ~ ~~~° °~° ~ ~ ai c~ °-°~ ~ c~.n Q V (n O ~' O N ~ ~ ~ ?' N ~ O C ~ ~ ~ c0 j ~ Q ~ ~ O ~ ~ ~ UO ~ ~ ~ .--. ~ ~ O O _N N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O C O O O ~~ Q L~~ '~ O N- ~ cU o U ~ C~ ~ C O N~~ rn °~ ~ i~~ Qo_c o(n0 a> E c .~ a~ ~ v ° c* o~ ~ C O c~ C X O~ C O_ E > L C ~ O _ ~ ~ ~ ~_ ~ ~ (~ 'D N ~ ~ ~ U ~ _ N (~ E O Q C d. O N ~ ~ p ~ ~ ~ O ~ m j ~ ~ U ~ ~ ~ ~ '~ T '-' C O C ~, ~ O ° cq ~ C ° Q~ D O - -O O 0 p ~ "O U p O O O C U c~ -~ vj O C U ,~ co -~ C 0) ctl C c~ O O C ..r ~~ O - ~ O O - - ~ ~ ~ .-" C C~ C r (~ C C ~ -° -O O~ -~ ~~ a a~ E~ oo Cry ° ~, ~ .-- Y i o p p CJ ~~ "d O C L O O ~ ~Q ~ ~ ~ ° ~ ~ h ~ - O C '~ C (d (~ CLf - O ~ > r ° ~ -O ~ Q ~ ~ ~ O p ~ C~ ~ 7 , . - 4 J ° o_ ~ E c~~ ~~0~ O~ ~ c ~ mo ~~~ ° ~~ ~ ~ Q ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ .~ ~ .~ >, ° O N ~ ~ ~ O p ~ c~ p tin c~ _ _ U ~ O ~ ~ ~ L Q ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ° ° ~ ~ ~ U Ica'-_o-~~~ ro~ro~c`~ ~o ~- ~m~ ~ ~~ ~a ~ ~~a~om~c~~ Q~ i~ o = mi c 0 oil ` ~ > ~~ a~ n ~ ~ ~~~c c o~r~moom~o~o~ ~ U cn r ~ C U ~ to L to ~ f~ C ~ ~~ F- CLS o ~o°ioasc o m = L C C ~ f~ CL U .~-+ N td ~ ~ U N d ~ m C ~ C a 7 LL 'D U O O ~ '~O C ~ m p ~ ~ O N (6 m 'O p~ C U ~ O N ~ U~1 O O d OC C7 U ~ ` ~ ~ U N -o -o -o o ~ p Y p ;jr L L_ L L_ t L d C_ (6 O, td C ~ ~ ~ cn ~ ~ U U) N M V t17 CD t~ N C cU 0_ ~ -~ 7 m o = a Q o ~ ~~ ~ ~ a i V c E `~ ~ L O U ~ > T ~ ~ fl_ C U ~ ~ _ N ~ N N a> Q U is a N ~ ~ ro t C L O N O O a cn ~ '~ Q m U ~ C O (~ O O C C N C U d ~ O ` ~ ~ 7 c i ~ o a i ~ ~j LL Z ~ O j N G1 ~ U o a m ° "O w I- ~ o ro .r s `o ° U ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ c O n. O ~ Q [0 U O w 0 m c m a~ 0 U N ~ N a~ c O o ~_ O ~ ~ E ~' c °' ~ o -° m ~ _ v' o ~ ~ `o a`~i ~ a a i ~ N Y a~i o ~ ° o ~ d ~ U O ~ C ~ a y °' ~ ,~ ~ d ~ ~ ~ ~ p o .~ E °' m m U °' N E ~ w a ~ v =O cj `~° ~ ~ o °' Q ~ a U m ~ ~ d o o w 0 0 0 ~ U ~ U m ~ tL N C O ~_ d Q N Y U s U 0 d Y • ~ • O • F&G-67 • FINDING This is to advise that the City of Rancho Cucamonga, acting as the lead agency, has conducted an • Initial Study to determine if the protect may have a significant effect on the environment and is proposing this Mitigated Negative Declaration based upon the following finding The Initial Study identified potentially significant effects but i _- City of Rancho Cucamonga MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION The fol/ow-ng Mitigated Negative Declarat-on -s be-ng c-rculated for pub!-c review -n accordance w-th the Cal-forn-a Environmental Quality Act Sect-on 21091 and 21092 of the Public Resources Code Protect File No Conditional Use Permit DRC2006-00337 Public Review Period Closes November 14, 2007 Project Name Project Applicant City of Rancho Cucamonga Protect Location (also see attached map) Located at 8517 Grove Avenue -APN 0207-222-05 Project Description ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSEMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2006-00337 - ELIAS ALFATA (for Bichara Mitre) - A request to build a 3,300 square foot full service carwash on 85 net acre of land in the General Commercial (GC) District, located at 8517 Grove Avenue The proposed development involves removing the majority of the westernmost of two existing automotive service buildings (1) Revisions in the project plans or proposals made or agreed to by the applicant before this proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration was released for public review would avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant effects would occur, and (2) There is no substantial evidence before the agency that the protect, as revised, may have a significant effect on the environment If adopted, the Mitigated Negative Declaration means that an Environmental Impact Report will not be required The factual and analytical basis for this finding is included in the attached Initial Study The protect file and all related documents are available for review at the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department at 10500 Civic Center Drive (909) 477-2750 or Fax (909) 477-2847 NOTICE The public is invited to comment on the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration during the review period November 14, 2007 Date of Determination Adopted By F & G- 68 RESOLUTION NO 07-65 • A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2006-00337 - A REQUEST TO CONSTRUCT A 3,300 SQUARE FOOT FULL SERVICE CAR WASH ON 85 NETACRE OF LAND IN THE GENERAL COMMERCIAL (GC) DISTRICT, LOCATED AT 8517 GROVE AVENUE THE PROPOSED CAR WASH WILL REPLACE THE AUTOMOTIVE BODY SHOP, ONE OF TWO EXISTING AUTOMOTIVE SERVICE BUILDINGS LOCATED ON THE SUBJECT PROPERTY, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN 0207-222-05 A Recitals 1 Elias Alfata, on behalf of Bichara Mitre, filed an application for the issuance of Conditional Use Permit DRC2006-00337, as described in the title of this Resolution Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Conditional Use Permit request is referred to as "the application " 2 On the 14th day of November 2007, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on said application and concluded said hearing on that date 3 All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred B Resolution • NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows 1 This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on November 14, 2007, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows a The application applies to a parcel of land located at the southeast corner of Arrow Route and Grove Avenue at 8517 Grove Avenue, with an overall area of about 37,000 square feet (0 85 acre) and a street frontage along Grove Avenue of about 216 feet and a street frontage along Arrow Route of about 176 feet, and b The project site is developed with two buildings - an automobile repair facility of about 3,700 square feet (identified as Building A on the Site Plan) and an auto body repair facility of about 2,200 square feet, and c To the north of the subject site, is amine-market and single-family residences, to the south, is a vacant lot, to the east, are single-family residences, and to the west, are single-family residences in the City of Upland, and d The zoning of the properties to the south and east is General Commercial (GC) • District The zoning of the properties to the north are General Commercial (GC) District (part) and Low Residential (L) District (part) The property to the west is in the City of Upland and is zoned residential, and F & G- 69 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 07-65 DRC2006-00337 - ELIAS ALFATA November 14, 2007 Page 2 e The applicant proposes to demolish the auto body repair facility and replace it with a 3,300 square foot full service car wash facility (identified as Building B on the Site Plan), redevelop the protect site (new landscaping, new parking lot improvements, etc ), and revise the exterior of the existing automotive repair building to match the new building, and service, and The car wash faality will provide full service car washes with vehicle detailing g The applicant is required to provide 25 parking stalls, he has provided 25, and h The proposed development is in contunction with a Variance application (Related File DRC2006-00737) to reduce the parking setback along Arrow Route, a Mayor/Special Boulevard, from the required 30 feet to a proposed 20 feet 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows • a The proposed development is in accord with the General Plan, the obtectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located The proposed protect is to construct a car wash, redevelop the protect site (new landscaping, new parking lot improvements, etc ), and revise the exterior of the existing automotive repair building This use is • permitted with a Conditional Use Permit in the General Commercial (GC) District The underlying General Plan designation is General Commercial b The proposed development, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially incurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity The existing development is automotive-related, the proposed land use is consistent with the existing land use and the expectations of the community The surrounding properties to the north, south, and east, and are zoned commercial The properties to the west are zoned residential in the City of Upland, do not have direct frontage on Grove Avenue, and are screened from the protect site by a block wall at least 6 feet high c The proposed development complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code except the parking setback along Arrow Route -the applicant has submitted a request for a variance for the Commission's review and approval The proposed development otherwise meets all standards outlined in the Development Code and the design and development standards and policies of the Planning Commission and the City 4 Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the protect will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows a Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local • CEQA Guidelines, City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the protect Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the protect would F&G-70 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 07-65 DRC2006-00337 - ELIAS ALFATA November 14, 2007 • Page 3 have a significant effect on the environment Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared Thereafter, City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration b The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it, finds (i) that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA, and (ii) that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment The Planning Commission further finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission Based on these findings, the Planning Commission hereby adopts the Mitigated Negative Declaration c The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081 6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation The Planning Commission therefore adopts the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project d The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring Program, and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings • upon which the Planning Commission's decision is based is the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 477-2750 5 Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference Planning Department 1) Approval is for the construction and operation of a car wash with a floor area of 3,300 square feet, the redevelopment of the project site including new landscaping, and parking lot paving/striping, and exterior revisions to the existing automotive repair building in the General Commercial (GC) District, located at the southeast corner of Arrow Route and Grove Avenue - APN 0207-222-05 2) The hours of operation for the car wash shall be limited to between 8 30 a m to 5 30 p m everyday 3) All automotive repair activities shall be conducted within Building A (as identified on the Site Plan) The storage of materials, equipment, vehicles, and waste shall be within this building or within an enclosed area subject to review and approval of the Planning Director • 4) The car wash shall operate in conformance with the performance standards as defined in the Development Code including, but not limited to, noise levels If the operation of the facility causes adverse F&G-71 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 07-65 DRC2006-00337 - ELIAS ALFATA November 14, 2007 Page 4 effects upon the neighboring properties, the Conditional Use Permit may be reviewed by the Planning Commission/Planning Director for consideration and modification of the use 5) Any modification or intensification of the use, including a change in operating hours, addition or relocation of equipment such as vacuums, and/or addition of services, shall require review and approval by the Planning Commission/Planning Director 6) Shared access, parking, and maintenance shall be incorporated in the project Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) 7) Downspouts shall not be visible from the exterior on any elevations of the buildings All downspouts shall be routed through the interior of the building walls 8) Retaining walls exposed to the public shall be decorative masonry Decorative means slump stone, split-face, or stucco 9) The trash enclosure shall be surrounded with dense shrub plantings • 10) Provide an overhead trellis at the north side of Building B over the main entrance The design and construction of this trellis and supporting • columns shall match the one proposed over the vacuum stations 11) All overhead trellises shall have cross members spaced no more than 18 inches on center with minimum dimensions of 4 inches by 12 inches The beams of all overhead trellises shall have the same detail cuts and finishes 12) Provide trim moldings or similar embellishments around all windows and doors The trim molding shall be painted to match the color of the parapet cornice 13) The trim that'caps' the stackstone veneer on both Buildings A and B, the overhead trellises, and the bus shelter shall be constructed of concrete for durability 14) Incorporate undulating berms along the street frontages within the landscape setback and landscape areas The berms should have a maximum height of at least 3 feet 15) All groundmounted equipment, utility boxes including transformers, and back-flow devices shall be surrounded by a minimum of two rows of shrubs spaced a minimum of 18 inches on center 16) The landscaping shall be installed prior to release for occupancy • 17) Add climbing vines along the perimeter wrought iron fencing F&G-72 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 07-65 DRC2006-00337 - ELIAS ALFATA November 14, 2007 • Page 5 18) The design, including materials and dimensions of the entry monument sign at the street corner, shall match the sign shown on page III-214 of the General Plan 19) Submit an application for a Uniform Sign Program for review and approval by the Planning Director prior to the submittal of any applications for sign permits All signs shall require review and approval of a Sign Permit application by the Planning Director prior to installation Engineering Department 1) Arrow Route frontage improvements to be in accordance with City "Mayor Arterial Street" standards including bus bay, drive approach, sidewalk, handicapped access ramp, street trees, streetlights, and traffic signing and striping per City standards a) "Bus Bay -Right-Turn-Lane" shall be constructed as close to City Standard Drawing No 119 as site constraints allow, as determined by the City Engineer b) Drive approaches to be in accordance with City Standard Drawing • No 101 (Type C) and No 119 c) Dual handicapped access ramps required per City Standard Drawing No 102 d) Provide 16,000 lumen HPSV street lights e) Parkways shall slope at 2 percent from the right-of-way to the top of curb along the street frontage 2) Grove Avenue frontage improvements to be in accordance with City "Secondary Arterial Street" standards and including curb and gutter, drive approach, sidewalk, street trees, streetlights, curbside drain outlet, and traffic signing and striping per City standards a) Drive approaches to be in accordance with City Standard Drawing No 101 (Type C) b) Replace cracked portion of concrete cross gutter (project side) along Grove Avenue crossing Arrow Route c) Drive approach and driveway centerlines shall align d) Sidewalk shall be property line adjacent e) Replace removed drive approaches and curbside drain outletwith curb and gutter and sidewalk Replaced removed parkway cobble • with planting area including street trees f) Provide 16,000 lumen HPSV street lights F&G-73 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 07-65 DRC2006-00337 - ELIAS ALFATA November 14, 2007 Page 6 g) The parkways shall slope at 2 percent from the right-of-way to the top of slope along the street frontage 3) Dedication shall be made of the following rights-of-way on streets, measured from street centerlines Minimum of 50 total feet on Arrow Route (6 additional) Along right turn lane and/or bus bay, provide 7 ft minimum from face of curb 4) Dedicate wall easement encompassing a new City monument Install monument consistent with Table III-26 of the General Plan (Gateway D - refer to City Drawing No 1652-L) That monument has a 33 3 by 4 5 foot footprint Monument to be shown on the street improvement plans The landscaping shall be maintained privately 5) An in-lieu fee as contribution to the future undergrounding of the existing overhead utilities (telecommunications and electrical, except for the 66 kV electrical) on the project side of Arrow Route shall be paid to the City prior to the issuance of building permits The fee shalt be the City adopted unit amounts times the length from the center of Grove Avenue to the east project boundary • 6) Street improvement plans shall be 90 percent complete prior to the • issuance of grading permits Street improvement plans shall be 100 percent complete, signed by the City Engineer, and an improvement agreement and bonds guaranteeing completion of the street improvements, shall be executed by the developer, prior to building permit issuance 7) The 4 parking spaces along the Grove Avenue driveway, perpendicular to its path, and closest to the street, shall be posted with signs, "Employee Parking Only " Environmental Mitigation Arr Qualify 1) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification 2) Prior to the issuance of any Grading Permits, developer shall submit construction plans to City denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for • the project The contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning Staff F&G-74 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 07-65 DRC2006-00337 - ELIAS ALFATA November 14, 2007 • Page 7 3) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113 Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high-volume, low-pressure spray 4) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108 5) All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403 Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods • Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local • ordinances and use sound engineering practices • Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction • Suspend grading operations during high winds (i e ,wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with Rule 403 requirements • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means 6) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWOCB]) daily to reduce Fine Particulate Matter (PM,o) emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 7) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions 8) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel-powered equipment where feasible • 9) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use F&G-75 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 07-65 DRC2006-00337 - ELIAS ALFATA November 14, 2007 Page 8 10) All industrial and commercial facilities shall post signs requiring that trucks shall not be left idling for prolonged periods (i e , in excess of 5 minutes) 11) All industrial and commeraal facilities shall designate preferential parking for vanpools 12) All industrial and commercial site tenants with 50 or more employees shall be required to post both bus and Metrolink schedules in conspicuous areas 13) All industrial and commercial site tenants with 50 or more employees shall be required to configure their operating schedules around the Metrolink schedule to the extent reasonably feasible 14) Ail residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate high-efficiency/low-polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters 15) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping Cultural Resources 1) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will • Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value • Consider establishing provisions to require incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point • Pursue educating the public about the area's archaeological heritage • Propose mitigation measures and recommend conditions of approval to eliminate adverse project effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, following appropriate CEQA guidelines • Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the project area Submit one copy of the completed report • J F&G-76 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 07-65 DRC2006-00337 - ELIAS ALFATA November 14, 2007 • Page 9 with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving 2) If any paleontological resource (i e plant or animal fossils) are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified paleontologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i e , paleontological monitoring) that maybe appropriate Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures • Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing activities • Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert • construction and notify the monitor of the find • Prepare, identify, and curate all recovered fossils for documentation in the summary report and transfer to an appropriate depository (i e ,San Bernardino County Museum) • Submit summary report to City of Rancho Cucamonga Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to San Bernardino County Museum Geology and Sods 1) The applicant shall submit a geotechnical report to determine any design and construction requirements within the Special Study Zone prior to issuance of building permits 2) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAOMD and RW QCB) daily to reduce PM~o emissions, in accordance with SCAOMD Rule 403 or re-planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible 3) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM,o emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction 4) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM,o emissions from the site during such episodes F&G-77 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 07-65 DRC2006-00337 - ELIAS ALFATA November 14, 2007 Page 10 . 5) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAOMD and RWOCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM~o emissions Hydrology and Water Quality 1) Prior to issuance of Grading Permits, the permit applicant shall submit to Building Official for approval, Storm W ater Pollution Prevention Plan (SW PPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical 2) An erosion control plan shall be prepared, included in grading plan, and implemented for the proposed project that identifies specific measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading This erosion control plan shall include the following measures at a minimum a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or • off-site as a result of this project will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame 3) During construction, temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff 4) During construction, to remove pollutants, street cleaning will be performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site 5) Applicant shall implement additional Best Management Practices as outlined in the Water Quality Management Plan prepared by Wright Mapping, Inc ,February 2007 (with subsequent revisions) Post-Construction Operational 6) The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in the Water Quality Management Plan prepared by Wright Mapping, Inc ,February 2007, to reduce pollutants after construction entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical 7) Landscaping plans shall include provisions for controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth Plans for these areas, F&G-78 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 07-65 DRC2006-00337 - ELIAS ALFATA November 14, 2007 • Page 11 including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of Grading Permits 8) Prior to issuance of Building Permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Engineer for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), including a project description and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable The WQMP shall identifythe structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004 9) Prior to issuance of Grading or Paving Permits, applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board Evidence that this has been obtained (i e , a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Building Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit Nose 1) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday 2) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17 02 120-D, as measured at the property line Developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17 02 120 Monitoring at other times may be required by the Building Official Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building Official within 24 hours, however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building Official If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted 3) The perimeter clock wall shall be constructed as early as possible in first phase 4) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any • time on Sunday or a national holiday Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes To the extent F&G-79 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 07-65 DRC2006-00337 - ELIAS ALFATA November 14, 2007 Page 12 feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings 6 The Secretary to this Commission shall certify the adoption of this Resolution APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2007 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY ATTEST Pam Stewart, Chairman James R Troyer, AICP, Secretary • I, James R Troyer, AICP, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 14th day of November 2007, by the following vote-to-wit AYES NOES ABSENT • F&G-80 RESOLUTION NO 07-66 • A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING VARIANCE DRC2006-00737, A REQUEST TO ALLOW A REDUCTION IN THE PARKING SETBACK ALONG ARROW ROUTE, A MAJOR ARTERIAL STREET, FROM THE REQUIRED 30 FEET TO 20 FEET IN CONJUNCTION WITH A REQUEST TO BUILD A 3,300 SQUARE FOOT FULL SERVICE CAR WASH ON 85 NET ACRE OF LAND IN THE GENERAL COMMERCIAL (GC) DISTRICT, LOCATED AT 8517 GROVE AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORTTHEREOF - APN 0207-222-05 A Recitals 1 Elias Alfata, on behalf of Bichara Mitre, filed an application for the approval of Variance DRC2006-00737, as described in the title of this Resolution Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Variance request is referred to as "the application " 2 On the 14th day of November 2007, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date 3 All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred B Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows 1 This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on November 14, 2007, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby speafically finds as follows a The application is related to Conditional Use Permit DRC2006-00337 which applies to a parcel about 37,000 square feet (0 85 acre) within the General Commercial (GC) District, located on the southeast corner of Arrow Route and Grove Avenue at 8517 Grove Avenue, and b The subject property has a street frontage along Grove Avenue of about 216 feet and a street frontage along Arrow Route of about 176 feet, and c The application contemplates the reduction in the parking setback along Arrow Route from the required 30 feet to a proposed 20 feet, and d The proposed project complies with all other development and design standards and policies as specified in the Development Code and by the of the Planning Commission, and F&G-81 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 07-66 VARIANCE DRC2006-00737 - ELIAS ALFATA November 14, 2007 Page 2 • 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows a The project is impacted by both existing on-site development (e g ,the existing automotive repair shop -Building A) and new City requirements which affect the layout of the site The property is less than an acre (0 85) in size and is located at a key intersection which involves the incorporation of specific technical criteria for locating access points and on-site circulation patterns Taken together these factors limit the net buildable area of the site and the location of on- site parking areas b The subject site is located at the southeast corner of Grove Avenue and Arrow Route, an important intersection shared with the City of Upland The project is required to construct public improvements in the form of a bus turnout lane and bus shelter along the Arrow Route frontage of the site These improvements are significant for a relatively small lot and reduce the overall usable depth of the property, since setbacks along street frontages are measured from the ultimate curb face In this case, the curb will be shifted south by about 10 feet for the bus turnout lane with the required setback line being similarly shifted south by the same distance Moreover, the locations of the required access points (e g ,drive approaches) onto the site are dictated by minimum intersection-to-driveway separation requirements administered by the Engineering Department and intended to prevent right/left turn conflicts at the intersection Thus, the proposed reduction in the required 30-foot setback from Arrow Route will allow the provision of necessary public improvements at the north end of the property and the reasonable development of • the 0 85-acre site in accordance with all other City standards and design objectives, and c Without benefit of the variance for the parking lot setback along the Arrow Route frontage, the applicant would be required to significantly alter the proposed project and/or site plan The applicant and staff have worked on alternative layouts and determined that the proposed layout is the most efficient and logical for the size of the property and the existing and proposed uses (i e , the automotive repair shop and car wash) that will remain on-site Except for relief in the required setback as requested by the applicant, the layout complies with the City's requirements for on-site parking and circulation, Fire Department access, and landscaping overall, and d The Variance to allow a reduced setback for the parking lot does not constitute a special privilege to applicant The site is relatively small and yet is subJect to the same type of requirements that would apply to much larger commercial and industrial developments which are not impacted in the same manner by such requirements Moreover, flexibility on the size and/or design of the bus turnout lane is limited by the short length of the property on Arrow Route to accommodate it and a drive approach which meet technical standards (e g width) for a commercial development Finally, the reduced setback will not impact the applicant's responsibility to comply with required drive aisle widths, parking space dimensional standards, exterior lighting, and landscaping near the adjacent properties, and e The granting of this Variance request will not adversely affect the appearance and characteristics of the surrounding area In fact, the project has been designed to significantly improve the overall use and appearance of the site at a significant entry point to the City The project takes into account the appropriate orientation of the car wash in relation to the nearby residences and businesses, the location of the existing building on the site, on-site parking, and access F&G-82 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 07-66 VARIANCE DRC2006-00737 - ELIAS ALFATA November 14, 2007 • Page 3 4 Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessmentfor the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto and incorporated herein by the reference, based upon the finding as follows a Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared Thereafter, City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration b The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it, finds (i) that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA, and (ii) that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment The Planning Commission further finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the • Planning Commission Based on these findings, the Planning Commission hereby adopts the Mitigated Negative Declaration c The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081 6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation The Planning Commission therefore adopts the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project d The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring Program, and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the Planning Commission's decision is based is the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 477-2750 5 Based upon the findings and conclusions setforth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below • F&G-83 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 07-66 VARIANCE DRC2006-00737 - ELIAS ALFATA November 14, 2007 Page 4 • Planning Department 1) The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve the applicant of his obligations under this condition 2) Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No 07-65 and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size) that are submitted for plan check review 3) The Variance approval shall expire if building permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval No extensions are allowed 6 The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2007 • PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY Pam Stewart, Chairman ATTEST James R Troyer, AICP, Secretary I, James R Troyer, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 14th day of November 2007, by the following vote-to-wit AYES COMMISSIONERS NOES COMMISSIONERS ABSENT COMMISSIONERS . F&G-84 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #. DRC2006-00337 AND DRC2006-00737 SUBJECT. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND VARIANCE APPLICANT ELIAS ALFATA FOR BICHARA MITRI LOCATION SOUTHEAST CORNER OF ARROW ROUTE AND GROVE AVENUE - APN 0207-222-05 ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS General Requirements 1 The appllcant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the Clty, Its agents, officers, or employees, because of the Issuance of such approval, or In the alternative, to relinquish such approval The appllcant shall reimburse the City, Its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, Its agents, officers, or employees maybe required by a court to pay as a result of such action The Clty may, at Its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition 2 Copses of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No 07-65, Standard Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be Included on the plans (full size) The sheet(s) are for Information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect 3 The appllcant shall be required to pay any applicable Fish and Game fees as shown below The protect planner will confirm which fees apply to this protect All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to the Planning Commission or Planning Director hearing a) Notice of Exemption - $50 b) Notice of Determination - $50 c) Mitigated Negative Declaration - $ 1,850 X d) Environmental Impact Report - $2,550 ~C-1-05 Completion Date -/-/. -/-/- -/-/- I \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2007 Res & Stf Rpt\DRC2006-00337StdCond 11-14 doc F&G-85 Protect No DRC2006-00337 AND DRC2006-00737 B Time Limits Conditional Use Permit approval shall expire if building permits are not Issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval No extensions are allowed C. Site Development 1 The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file In the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, and the Development Code regulations 2 Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director 3 Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Building Code and State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Department to show compliance The buildings shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy 4 Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits 5 All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first 6 Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the time of building permit issuance 7 A detailed on-site lighting plan, including a photometric diagram, shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Director and Police Department (477-2800) prior to the issuance of building permits Such plan shall indicate style, illumination, location, height, and method of shielding so as not to adversely affect adjacent properties All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc ,shall be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the Planning Director For single-family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, including proper Illumination D. Shopping Centers Provide for the following design features in each trash enclosure, to the satisfaction of the Planning Director Architecturally integrated Into the design of (the shopping center/the project) Separate pedestrian access that does not require the opening of the main doors and to include self-closing pedestrian doors Large enough to accommodate two trash bins 2 I \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2007 Res & Stf Rpt\DRC2006-00337StdCond 11-14 doc Completion Date _/_/_ • -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- / / - /-/- -/-/_ • / / -/-/- / / / / -/-/- / / / / F&G-86 Project No DRC2006-00337 AND DRC2006 00737 • d Roll-up doors e Trash bens with counter-weighted Ilds Architecturally treated overhead shade trellis Chain Ilnk screen on top to prevent trash from blowing out of the enclosure and designed to be hidden from view 2 Graffiti shall be removed within 72 hours 3 The entire site shall be kept free from trash and debris at all times and In no event shall trash and debris remain for more than 24 hours 4 Signs shall be conveniently posted for "no overnight parking" and for "employee parking only " 5 All operations and businesses shall be conducted to comply with the following standards which shall be incorporated into the lease agreements for all tenants a Noise Level -All commercial activities shall not create any noise that would exceed an exterior noise level of 60 dB during the hours of 10 p m until 7 a m and 65 dB during the hours of l a m until 10 p m Loading and Unloading - No person shall cause the loading, unloading, opening, closing, or other handling of boxes, crates, containers, building materials, garbage cans, or other similar objects between the hours of 10 p m and 7 a m unless otherwise specified herein, in a manner which would cause a noise disturbance to a residential area E. 6 Textured pavement shall be provided across circulation aisle, pedestrian walkway, and plaza They shall be of brick/tlle pavers, exposed aggregate, Integral color concrete, or any combination thereof Full samples shall be submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the Issuance of building permits 7 The lighting fixture design shall compliment the architectural program It shall Include the plaza area lighting fixtures, building Ilghting fixtures (exterior), and parking lot Ilghting fixtures 8 Any outdoor vending machines shall be recessed Into the building faces and shall not extend Into the pedestrian walkways The design details shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Director prior to the Issuance of building permits Building Design All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted equipment and/or projections, shall be shielded from view and the sound buffered from adjacent properties and streets as required by the Planning Department Such screening shall be architecturally Integrated with the bullding design and constructed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director Details shall be Included In bullding plans For commercial and Industrial projects, paint roll-up doors and service doors to match main bullding colors F Parking and Vehicular Access (indicate details on building plans) All parking spaces shall be 9 feet wide by 18 feet long When a side of any parking space abuts a bullding, wall, support column, or other obstruction, the space shall be a minimum of 11 feet wide • Completion Date -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- _/_~ -/-/- -/_/. -/-/- -/-/- _/_/ I \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2007 Res & Stf Rpt\DRC2006-00337StdCond 11-14 doc F&G-87 Protect No DRC2006-00337 AND DRC2006-00737 Completion Date 2 Handicap accessible stalls shall be provided for commercial and office facilities with 25 or more _/_/_ parking stalls Designate two percent or one stall, whichever is greater, of the total number of stalls for use by the handicapped . 3 Motorcycle parking area shall be provided for commercial and office facllltles with 25 or more _/_/_ parking stalls Developments with over 100 parking stalls shall provide motorcycle parking at the rate of one percent The area for motorcycle parking shall be a minimum of 56 square feet G Tri p Reduction 1 Bicycle storage spaces shall be provided in all commercial, office, industrial, and multifamily _/_/_ residential projects of more than 10 units Minimum spaces equal to five percent of the required automobile parking spaces or three bicycle storage spaces, whichever is greater After the first 50 bicycle storage spaces are provided, additional storage spaces required are 2 5 percent of the required automobile parking spaces Warehouse distribution uses shall provide bicycle storage spaces at a rate of 2 5 percent of the required automobile parking spaces with a minimum of a 3-bike rack In no case shall the total number of bicycle parking spaces required exceed 100 Where this results in a fraction of 0 5 or greater, the number shall be rounded off to the higher whole number H. Landscaping 1 A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in _/_/_ the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision 2 A minimum of 20% of trees planted within industrial projects, and a minimum of 30% within _/_/_ commercial and office projects, shall be specimen size trees - 24-inch box or larger 3 Within parking lots, trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15-gallon tree for everythree parking _/_/_ • stalls 4 Trees shall be planted In areas of public view adjacent to and along structures at a rate of one __/_,/_ tree per 30 linear feet of building 5 For multi-family residential and non-residential development, property owners are responsible for __/_/_ the continual maintenance of all landscaped areas on-site, as well as contiguous planted areas within the public right-of-way All landscaped areas shall be kept free from weeds and debris and maintained in healthy and thriving condition, and shall receive regular pruning, fertilizing, mowing, and trimming Any damaged, dead, diseased, or decaying plant material shall be replaced within 30 days from the date of damage 6 The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included in _/_/_ the required landscape plans and shall be subject to Planning Director review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the Engineering Department 7 Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on the _/__/_ perimeter of this project area shall be continuously maintained by the developer 8 All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment If located in public maintenance areas, the __/_/_ design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Department • 4 I \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2007 Res & Stf Rpt\DRC2006-00337StdCond 11-14 doc F&G-88 Protect No DRC2006-00337 AND DRC2006-00737 Completion Date I. • . Signs 1 The signs Indicated on the submitted plans are conceptual only and not a part of this approval Any signs proposed for this development shall comply with the Slgn Ordinance and shall require separate application and approval by the Planning Department prior to installation of any signs 2 A Uniform Sign Program for this development shall be submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to issuance of building permits Environmental 1 Mitigation measures are required for the protect The applicant is responsible for the cost of _/_/_ _/_/ / / Implementing said measures, Including monitoring and reporting Applicant shall be required to _ _ _ post cash, letter of credit, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the Planning Director in the amount of $ 538 prior to the issuance of building permits, guaranteeing satisfactory performance and completion of all mitigation measures These funds may be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measures Failure to complete all actions required by the approved environmental documents shall be considered grounds for forfeit K. Other Agencies 1 The applicant shall contact the U S Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location _/_/_ of mailboxes Multi-family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for mailboxes with adequate lighting The final location of the mailboxes and the design of the overhead structure shall be subject to Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits ~PPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS NOTE ANY REVISIONS MAY VOID THESE REQUIREMENTS AND NECESSITATE ADDITIONAL REVIEW(S) L. General Requirements 1 Submit five complete sets of plans including the following _/_/_ a Site/Plot Plan, b Foundation Plan, c Floor Plan, d Ceiling and Roof Framing Plan, e Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of the main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams, f Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams, water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning, and g Planning Department Project Number (i e , DRC2006-00337) clearly identified on the outside of all plans 2 Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a soils report _/_/_ Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are required prior to plan check submittal I \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2007 Res & Stf Rpt\DRC2006-00337StdCond 11-14 doc F & G- 89 Project No DRC2006-00337 AND DRC2006-00737 Completion Date 3 Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers' Compensation coverage to _/_/_ the City prior to permit Issuance 4 arate ermits are re walls S red fo f in and/o / • / p qui r enc g r ep _ _ _ 5 Business shall not open for operation prior to posting the Certificate of Occupancy Issued by the _/_/_ Building and Safety Department M Site Development 1 Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction All plans shall be _/_/_ marked with the project file number (i e , DRC2006-00337) The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted California Codes, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application Contact the Building and Safety Department for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts 2 Prior to issuance of building permits for a new commercial or industrial development project or _/_/_ mayor addition, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate Such fees may Include but are not limited to Clty Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Check Fees, Construction and Demolition Diversion Program deposit and fees and School Fees Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Building and Safety Department prior to permits issuance 3 Street addresses shall be provided by the Building and Safety Official after tract/parcel map _/_/_ recordation and prior to issuance of building permits 4 Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m Monday _/_/_ through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays 5 Construct trash enclosure(s) per City Standard (available at the Planning Department's public _/_/_ counter) . N. New Structures 1 Provide compliance with the California Building Code (CBC) for property line clearances _/_/_ considering use, area, and fire-resistiveness 2 Provide compliance with the California Building Code for required occupancy separations _/_/_ 3 Provide draft stops In attic areas, not to exceed 3,000 square feet, in accordance with CBC _/_/_ Section 1505 4 Openings in exterior walls shall be protected in accordance with CBC Table 5-A _/_/_ 5 Upon tenant improvement plan check submittal, additional requirements may be needed _/_/_ O. Grading 1 Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with California Building Code, City Grading _/_/_ Standards, and accepted grading practices The final grading plan shall be In substantial conformance with the approved grading plan 2 A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to _/_/_ perform such work 3 A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the _/_/_ time of application for grading plan check 6 I \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2007 Res & Stf Rpt\DRC2006-00337StdCond 11-14 doc F & G- 90 Protect No DRC2006-00337 AND DRC2006-00737 4 The final grading plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, • submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of building permits 5 A separate grading plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill The grading plan shall be prepared, stamped, and signed by a California registered Civil Engineer APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS P. Dedication and Vehicular Access 1 Dedication shall be made of the following rights-of-way on the perimeter streets (measured from street centerline) 50 total feet on Arrow Route Q • 2 Corner property line cutoffs shall be dedicated per City Standards 3 Easements for public sidewalks and/or street trees placed outside the public right-of-way shall be dedicated to the City 4 Additional street right-of-way shall be dedicated along right turn lanes, to provide a minimum of 7 feet measured from the face of curbs Street Improvements All public improvements (interior streets, drainage faculties, communitytraiis, paseos, landscaped areas, etc) shown on the plans and/or tentative map shall be constructed to City Standards Interior street improvements shall Include, but are not limited to, curb and gutter, AC pavement, drive approaches, sidewalks, street lights, and street trees 2 Construct the following perimeter street improvements Including, but not limited to Street Name Curb & Gutter A.C Pvmt Side- walk Drive Appr Street Lights Street Trees Comm Trail Median Island Bike Trail Other Arrow Route X X X X X X (e) Grove Avenue X X X X X (f) Notes (a) Median island includes landscaping and Irrigation on meter (b) Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check (c) If so marked, sidewalk shall be curvilinear per Standard 114 (d) If so marked, an in-lieu of construction fee shall be provided for this item (e) Bus bay right-turn lane, dual ADA ramps (f) Repair broken cross gutter crossing Arrow Route Improvement Plans and Construction a Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the Clty Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the pubiicand/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the Issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first • 7 Completion Date -/-/- -/-~ -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- --/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/-/. I \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2007 Res & Stf Rpt\DRC2006-00337StdCond 11 14 doc F&G-91 Project No DRC2006-00337 AND DRC2006-00737 Completion Date b Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office in addition to any other permits required c Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer d Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction project along mayor or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer Notes 1) Pull boxes shall be No 6 at intersections and No 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer 2) Conduit shall be 3-inch galvanized steel with pull rope or as specified e Handicapped access ramps shall be installed on all corners of intersections per City Standards or as directed by the City Engineer f Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction Street or lane closure permits are requited A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer g Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks Under sidewalk drams shall be installed to City Standards, except for single family residential lots h Street names shall be approved by the Planning Director prior to submittal for first plan check 4 Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards ir1 accordance with the City's street tree program -~-~ • -~-~- / / -~-~- -~-~. -~-~ -~-~- • -~---~- 8 I \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2007 Res & Stf Rpt\DRC2006 00337StdCond 11-14 doc F&G-92 Project No DRC2006-00337 AND DRC2006-00737 5 Install street trees per Clty street tree design guidelines and standards as follows The completed • legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street Improvement plans Street Improvement plans shall Include a line Item within the construction legend stating "Street trees shall be Installed per the notes and legend on sheet_(typlcally sheet 1) " Where public landscape plans are required, tree Installation In those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans The City Engineer reserves the right to adjust tree species based upon field conditions and other variables For additional Information, contact the Project Engineer Mm Grow Street Name Botanical Name Common Name Space Spacing Size oty Arrow Route Ginkgo bilo ba Maindenhair Tree 5' 35' O C 24" Box Fill 'Fairmount' in Grove Avenue Hymenosporum Flavum Sweetshade 5' 20' O C 15 Gal Fill rn Construction Notes for Street Trees 1) All street trees are to be planted In accordance with Clty standard plans 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the Clty Inspector Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backflll soli amendments, as determined by the City Inspector ~) All street trees are subject to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Departrr~er~t 4) Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only 6 Intersection Ilne of sight designs shall be reviewed by the Clty Engineer for conformance with adopted policy On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all project Intersections, including driveways Local residential street intersections and commercial or industrial driveways may have Imes of sight plotted as required Public Maintenance Areas A signed consent and waiver form to loin and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the Clty Engineer prior to final map approval or Issuance of building permits whichever occurs first Formation costs shall be borne by the developer S. Utilities 1 The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary 2 Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the Cucamonga Valley W ater District (CVW D), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino A letter of compliance from the CVW D is required prior to final map approval or Issuance of permits, whichever occurs first Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits In the case of all other residential projects T. General Requirements and Approvals A non-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all new streetlights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to building permit Issuance if no map is involved • Completion Date _/-/- -/-/- _/_/. -/-/- -/-/ -/-/- I \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2007 Res & Stf Rpt\DRC2006-00337StdCond 11 14 doc F&G-93 Project No DRC2006-00337 AND DRC2006 00737 Completion Date 2 Prior to the Issuance of building permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program The deposit is fully refundable if at least 50% of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City Form CD-1 shall be submitted to the Engineering Department when the first building permit application is submitted to Building and Safety Form CD-2 shall be submitted to the Engineering Department within 60 days foliowrng the completion of the construction and/or demolition project APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE POLICE DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2800, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS U. Security Lighting 1 All parking, common, and storage areas shall have minimum maintained 1-foot candle power These areas should be lighted from sunset to sunrise and on photo sensored cell 2 All buildings shall have minimal security lighting to eliminate dark areas around the buildings, with direct lighting to be provided by all entryways Lighting shall be consistent around the entire development 3 Llghting In exterior areas shall be in vandal-resistant fixtures V. Security Hardware 1 One-inch single cylinder dead bolts shall be Installed on all entrance doors If windows are within 40 inches of any locking device, tempered glass or a double cylinder dead bolt shall be used 2 All garage or rolling doors shall have slide bolts or some type of secondary locking devices 3 All roof openings giving access to the building shall be secured with either Iron bars, metal gates, or alarmed W Windows 1 All sliding glass windows shall have secondary locking devices and should not be able to be lifted from frame or track in any manner 2 Storefront windows shall be visible to passing pedestrians and traffic 3 Security glazing is recommended on storefront windows to resist window smashes and impede entry to burglars X. Building Numbering 1 Numbers and the backgrounds shall be of contrasting color and shall be reflective for nighttime visibility 2 Developer shall paint roof top numbers on one or more roofs of this development They shall be a minimum of three feet in length and two feet in width and of contrasting color to background The stencils for this purpose are on loan at the Rancho Cucamonga Police Department APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DEPARTMENT, FIRE PROTECTION PLANNING SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SEE ATTACHED 10 -/-/- /-/ /_/ / / • /_/_ ~--/- /_/_ • /_/_ /_/_ / / - -/- /- -/- /- • I \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2007 Res & Stf Rpt\DRC2006-00337StdCond 11-14 doc F&G-94 ~° ~ ~.~;„~_ -~ Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection rk District ,,, - ._~e ` Fire Construction Services STANDARD CONDITIONS April 26, 2007 The Grove Plaza 8517 G rove Ave Redevelop Existing Center & New Car Wash D R C2006-00337 THE FOLLOWING STANDARD CONDITIONS APPLY TO THIS PROJECT The RCFPD Procedures & Standards which are referenced in this document can be access on the web at ~ //www ci rancho-Cucamonga ca us/fire/index htm under the Flre Safety Division & Fire Construction Services section Search by article, the preceding number of the standard refers to the article Chose the appropriate article number then a drop down menu will appear, select the corresponding standard FSC-1 Public and Private Water Supply • 1 Design guidelines for Fire Hydrants The following provides design guidelines for the spacing and location of fire hydrants a The maximum distance between fire hydrants in commercial/industrial projects is 300-feet No portion of the exterior wall shall be located more than 150-feet from an approved fire hydrant For cui-de-sacs, the distance shall not exceed 100-feet b The preferred locations for fire hydrants are 1 At the entrance(s) to a commercial, industrial or residential project from the public roadways 2 At intersections 3 On the right side of the street, whenever practical and possible 4 As required by the Fire Safety Division to meet operational needs of the Fire District 5 A minimum of forty-feet (40') from any building c If any portion of a facility or building is located more than 150-feet from a public fire hydrant measured on an approved route around the exterior of the facility or building, additional private or public fire hydrants and mains capable of supplying the required fire flow shall be provided F & G- 95 d Provide one fire hydrant for each 1000 gpm of required fire flow or fraction thereof FSC-2 Fire Flow 1 The required fire flow for this project is 2000 gallons per minute at a minimum residual pressure of 20-pounds per square inch This requirement is made in accordance with Fire Code Appendix III-A, as adopted by the Fire District Ordinances 2 The required minimum fire flow for this project, when automatic fire sprinklers are installed is 1500 gallons per minute at a minimum residual pressure of 20-pounds per square inch This flow reflects a 50-percent reduction for the installation of an approved automatic fire sprinkler system in accordance with NFPA 13 with central station monitoring This requirement is made in accordance with the California Fire Code Appendix III-A, as adopted by the Fire District Ordinances 3 Public fire hydrants located within a 500-foot radius of the proposed project may be used to provide the required fire flow subject to Fire District review and approval Private fire hydrants on adjacent property shall not be used to provide required fire flow 4 Fire protection water plans are required for ail projects that must extend the existing water supply to or onto the site Building permits will not be issued until fire protection water plans are approved 5 On all site plans to be submitted for review, show all fire hydrants located within . 600-feet of the proposed project site FSC-3 Prerequisite for submittal of Overhead Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems 1 Prior to submitting plans for an overhead automatic fire sprinkler system, the applicant shall submit plans, specifications and calculations for the fire sprinkler system underground supply piping Approval of the underground supply piping system must be obtained prior to submitting the overhead fire sprinkler system plans FSC-4 Requirements for Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems Rancho Cucamonga Fire District Ordinance 15, the 2001 California Fire Code and/or any other applicable standards require an approved automatic fire sprinkler system to be installed in 1 Commercial or industrial structures greater than 7,500 square feet 2 Group "A" Occupancies 3 "E" Occupancies with an occupant load of 50 or more persons 4 Ail structures that do not meet Fire District access requirements (see Fire Access) 5 When required fire flow cannot be provided due to inadequate volume or pressure • F&G-96 6 When the building access does not meet the requirements of the 2001 California Building Code and the RCFPD Fire Department Access -Fire Lane Standard #9-7 • 7 When any applicable code or standard requires the structure to be sprinklered FSC-5 Fire Alarm System 1 The California Building Code, the RCFPD Fire Alarm Standard #10-6 and/or the California Fire Code require a listed fire sprinkler monitoring Central Station Fire Alarm system Plan check approval and a building permit are required Prior to the installation of the fire alarm system Plans and specifications shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services in accordance with RCFPD Fire Alarm Standard #10-6 FSC-6 Fire District Site Access Fire District access roadways include public roads, streets and highways, as well as private roads, streets drive aisles and/or designated fire lanes Please reference the RCFPD Fire Department Access Roadways Std #9-7 1 Location of Access Ali portions of the structures 1St story exterior wall shall be located within 150-feet of Fire District vehicle access, measure on an approved route around the exterior of the building Landscaped areas, unpaved changes in elevation, gates and fences are deemed obstructions 2 Specifications for private Fire District access roadways per the RCFPD Standards are • a The minimum unobstructed width is 26-feet b The maximum inside turn radius shall be 24-feet c The minimum outside turn radius shall be 50-feet d The minimum radius for cul-de-sacs is 45-feet e The minimum vertical clearance is 14-feet, 6-inches f At any private entry median, the minimum width of traffic lanes shall be 20-feet on each side g The angle of departure and approach shall not exceed 9-degrees or 20 percent h The maximum grade of the driving surface shall not exceed 12% Support a minimum load of 70,000 pounds gross vehicle weight (GVW) ~ Trees and shrubs planted adjacent to the fire lane shall be kept trimmed to a minimum of 14-feet, 6-inches from the ground up Vegetation shall not be allowed to obstruct Fire Department apparatus • 3 Access Doorways Approved doorways, accessible without the use of a ladder, shall be provided as follows 3 F & G- 97 a In buildings without high-piled storage, access shall be provided in accordance with the 2001 California Building Code, Fire and/or any other applicable standards b In buildings with high-piled storage access doors shall be provided m each 100 lineal feet or mayor fraction thereof, of the exterior wall that faces the required access roadways When railways are installed provisions shall be made to maintain Fire District access to all required openings 4 Access Walkways Hardscaped access walkways shall be provided from the fire apparatus access road to all required building exterior openings 5 Commercial/Industrial Gates Any gate installed across a Fire Department access road shall be in accordance with Fire District Standard #9-2 The following design requirements apply a Prior to the fabrication and installation of the gates, plans are required to be submitted to Fire Construction Services (FCS) for approval Upon the completion of the installation and before placing the gates in service, inspection and final acceptance must be requested from FCS b Gates must slide open horizontally or swing inward c Gates may be motorized or manual d When fully open, the minimum clearance dimension of drive access shall be 20 • feet e Manual gates must be equipped with a RCFPD lock available at the Fire Safety Office for $20 00 f Motorized gates must open at the rate of one-foot per second g The motorized gate actuation mechanism must be equipped with a manual override device and afail-safe or battery backup feature to open the gate or release the locking Mechanism in case of power failure or mechanical malfunction h Motorized gates shall be equipped with a Knox override key switch The switch must be installed outside the gate in a visible and unobstructed location For motorized gates, a traffic loop device must be installed to allow exiting from the complex ~ If traffic pre-emption devices (TPD) are to be installed, the device, location and operation must be approved by the Fire Chief prior to installation Bi-directional or multiple sensors may be required due to complexity of the various entry configurations 4 F & G- 98 7 Fire Lane Identification Red curbing and/or signage shall identify the fire lanes A site plan illustrating the proposed delineation that meets the minimum Fire District • standards shall be included in the architectural plans submitted to B&S for approval 8 Approved Fire Department Access Any approved mitigation measures must be clearly noted on the site plan A copy of the approved Alternative Method application, if applicable, must be reproduced on the architectural plans submitted to B&S for plan review 6 Roof Access There shall be a means of fire department access from the exterior walls of the buildings on to the roofs of all commercial, industrial and multi-family residential structures with roofs less than 75' above the level of the fire access road a This access must be reachable by either fire department ground ladders or by an aerial ladder b A minimum of one ladder point with a fixed ladder shall be provided in buildings with construction features, or high parapets that inhibit roof access c The number of ladder points may be required to be increased, depending on the building size and configuration d Regardless of the parapet height or construction features the approved ladder point shall be identified in accordance to the roof access standard • e Where the entire roof access is restricted by high parapet walls or other obstructions, a permanently mounted access ladder is required f Multiple access ladders may be required for larger buildings g Ladder construction must be in accordance with the RCFPD Roof Access Standard 9-9 Appendix A and drawings 9-9a and 9-9b h A site plan showing the locations of the roof ladder shall be submitted during plan check Ladder points shall face a fire access roadway(s) • FSC-10 Occupancy and Hazard Control Permits Listed are those Fire Code permits commonly associated with the business operations and/or building construction Pian check submittal is required with the permit application for approval of the permit, field inspection is required prior to permit issuance General Use Permit shall be required for any activity or operation not specifically described below, which in the Judgment of the Fire Chief is likely to produce conditions that may be hazardous to life or property • Aerosol Products • Application of Flammable Finishes Operation Magnesium Working Motor Vehicle Fuel-Dispensing 5 F&G-99 • Automobile Wrecking Yards • Battery Systems • Candles and open flames in public assemblies • Cellulose Nitrate • Compressed Gases • Cryogenics • Dry Cleaning Plants • Dust-Producing Processes and Operations • Explosive or Blasting Agents • Flammable and Combustible Liquids • Fruit Ripening Plants • Hazardous Materials Supported Structures • High-Pile Combustible Storage (HPS) Open Burning Organic Coating Ovens Powder Coating Public Assembly Pyrotechnical Special Effects Radioactive Materials Refrigeration Systems Repair Garages Rubbish Handling Operations Spraying or Dipping Operations Tents, Canopies and/or Air Tire Storage • Liquefied Petroleum Gases Welding and Cutting Operations • LPG or Gas Fuel Vehicles in Assembly Buildings Wood Products/Lumber Yards FSC-11 Hazardous Materials -Submittal to the County of San Bernardino The San Bernardino County Fire Department shall review your Business Emergency/Contingency Plan for compliance with minimum standards Contact the San Bernardino County Fire, Hazardous Materials Division at (909) 387-4631 for forms and assistance The County Fire Department is the Cal/EPA Certified Unified Program Agency (CUPA) for the City of Rancho Cucamonga 1 If the facility is a NEW business, a Certificate of Occupancy issued by Building & Safety will not be finalized until the San Bernardino County Fire Department reviews your Business Emergency/Contingency Plan California Government Code, Section 65850 2 prohibits the City from issuing a final Certificate of Occupancy unless the applicant has met or is meeting specific hazardous materials disclosure requirements A Risk Management Program (RMP) may also be required if regulation substances are to be used or stored at the new facility 2 Any business that operates on rented or leased property which is required to submit a Pian, is also required to submit a notice to the owner of the property in writing stating that the business is subject to the Business Emergency/Contingency Plan mandates and has complied with the provisions The tenant must provide a copy of the Plan to the property owner within five (5) working days, if requested by the owner FSC-12 Hazardous Materials -Submittal to Fire Construction Services Plans shall be submitted and approved prior to construction of buildings and/or the installation of equipment designed to store, use or dispense hazardous materials in 6 • r~ u F & G-100 accordance with the 2001 California Building, Fire, Mechanical, Plumbing, Electrical Codes, RCFPD Ordinances FD15 and FD39 and other implemented and/or adopted . standards FSC-13 Alternate Method Application Fire Construction Services staff and the Fire Marshal will review all requests for alternate method, when submitted The request must be submitted on the Fire District "Application for Alternate Method" form along with supporting documents and payment of the $92 review fee FCS-15 Annexation of the parcel map Annexation of the parcel map into the Community Facilities District #85-1 or #88-1 is required prior to the issuance of grading or building permits Chronological Summary of RCFPD Standard Conditions PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS -Please complete the following prior to the issuance of any building permits• 1 Private Water Supply (Fire) Systems The applicant shall submit construction plans, specifications, flow test data and calculations for the private water main system for review and approval by the Fire District Plans and installation shall comply with Fire District Standards Approval of the on-site (private) fire underground and water plans is required prior to any building permit issuance for any structure on the site Private on-site • combination domestic and fire supply system must be designed in accordance with RCFPD Standards # 9-4, #10-2 and #10-4 The Building & Safety Division and Fire Construction Services will perform plan checks and inspections All private on-site fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable prior to delivering any combustible framing materials to the site Fire construction Services will inspect the installation, witness hydrant flushing and grant a clearance before lumber is dropped 2 Public Water Supply (Domestic/Fire) Systems The applicant shall submit a plan showing the locations of all new public fire hydrants for the review and approval by the Fire District and CCWD On the plan, show all existing fire hydrants within a 600-foot radius of the project Please reference the RCFPD Water Plan Submittal Procedure Standard All required public fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable prior to delivering any combustible framing materials to the site CCWD personnel shall inspect the installation and witness the hydrant flushing Fire Construction Services shall inspect the site after acceptance of the public water system by CCWD Fire Construction Services must grant a clearance before lumber is dropped 3 Construction Access The access roads must be paved in accordance with all the requirements of the RCFPD Fire Lane Standard #9-7 All temporary utilities over access roads must be installed at least 14' 6" above the finished surface of the road 4 Fire Floy-r A current fire flow letter from CCWD must be received The applicant is • responsible for obtaining the fire flow information from CCWD and submitting the letter to Fire Construction Services 7 F & G-101 PRIOR TO THE RELEASE OF TEMPORARY POWER The building construction must be substantially completed in accordance with Fire Construction • Services' "Temporary Power Release Checklist and Procedures" PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY OR FINAL INSPECTION -Please complete the following• Hydrant Markers All fire hydrants shall have a blue reflective pavement marker indicating the fire hydrant location on the street or driveway m accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Standard Plan 134, "Installation of Reflective Hydrant Markers" On private property, the markers shall be installed at the centerline of the fire access road, at each hydrant location 2 Private Fire Hydrants For the purpose of final acceptance, a licensed sprinkler contractor, in the presence of Fire Construction Services, shall conduct a test of the most hydraulically remote on-site fire hydrants The underground fire line contractor, developer and/or owner are responsible for hiring the company to perform the test A final test report shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services verifying the fire flow available The fire flow available must meet or exceed the required fire flow in accordance with the California Fire Code 3 Fire Sprinkler System Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler system(s) shall be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services 4 Fire Sprinkler Monitoring Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler monitoring system must be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services The fire sprinkler monitoring system shall be installed, tested and operational immediately following the completion of the fire sprinkler system (subfect to the release of power) • 5 Fire Suppression Systems and/or other special hazard protection systems shall be inspected, tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services before occupancy is granted and/or equipment is placed in service 6 Fire Alarm System Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire alarm system shall be installed, inspected, tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services 7 Access Control Gates Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, vehicular gates must be inspected, tested and accepted in accordance with RCFPD Standards #9-1 or #9-2 by Fire Construction Services 8 Fire Access Roadways Prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, the fire access roadways must be installed in accordance with the approved plans and acceptable to Fire Construction Services The CC&R's, the reaprocai agreement and/or other approved documents shall be recorded and contain an approved fire access roadway map with provisions that prohibit parking, specify the method of enforcement and identifies who is responsible for the required annual inspections and the maintenance of all required fire access roadways 9 Address Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, commercial/industrial and multi-family buildings shall post the address with minimum 8-inch numbers on contrasting background, visible from the street and electrically illuminated during periods of darkness • When the building setback exceeds 200 feet from the public street, an additional non- F & G-102 illuminated 6-inch minimum number address shall be provided at the property entrance Larger address numbers will be required on buildings located on wide streets or built with • large setbacks in multi-tenant commercial and industrial buildings The suite designation numbers and/or letters shall be provided on the front and back of all suites 10 Hazardous Materials Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the applicant must demonstrate (in writing from the County) that the facility has met or is meeting the Risk Management Plan (RMP) or Business Emergency/Contingency Plan with the San Bernardino County Fire Department, Hazardous Materials/Emergency Response and Enforcement Division The applicant must also obtain inspection and acceptance by Fire Construction Services 11 Confidential Business Occupancy Information The applicant shall complete the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District "Confidential Business Occupancy Information" form This form provides contact information for Fire District use in the event of an emergency at the subject building or property This form must be presented to the Fire Construction Services Inspector 12 Mapping Site Plan Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, a 8'/z" x 11" or 11" x 17" site plan of the site m accordance with RCFPD Standard #13-1 shall be revised by the applicant to reflect the actual location of all devices and building features as required in the standard The site plan must be reviewed and accepted by the Fire Inspector • • 9 F & G-103 4, V~! \t1 'PY \/ ~_ ~_ ~ _~ ~k~t~ ~.~~~- T H E C I T Y O F RANCHO CUCAMONG~A Stiff Report DATE November 14, 2007 TO Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM James R Troyer, AICP Planning Director BY Mike Smith, Associate Planner SUBJECT REQUEST TO INITIATE DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DRC2007-00810 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to amend Section 17 30 030 and Table 17 30 030 to allow automobile sales and leasing, subject to a Conditional Use Permit, in the General Industrial (GI) District, Subarea 1 • BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The City Planning Department received a request from Mr George Reynoso to conduct automobile sales at his existing automotive body repair facility at 8730 Vineyard Avenue, a property of 1 25 acre at the southwest corner of Vineyard Avenue and 9th Street This property is located en the General Industrial (GI) District, Subarea 1 Currently, this use is not permitted within this district However, numerous other auto-related land uses are permitted (by right or with a Conditional Use Permit) including, automotive fleet storage, rental, repair (mayor and minor), service courts, and service stations Staff believes that amending the Development Code to permit this land use, subject to the review and approval of a Conditional Use Permit, will comply with the intent of this development district and will be consistent with the automotive-related uses that are currently allowed, or already exist, in this district If the Planning Commission approves the request to initiate the Code amendment, staff will work with the applicant to bring forward a Code amendment application for consideration RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve the request to initiate the Development Code Amendment to allow automobile sales and leasing in the General Industrial (GI) District, Subarea 1 Respectfully submitted, ~• • Jam s R Troyer, AICP Planning Director JRT/MS ge ITEM H PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2007-00810 -CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA November 14, 2007 Page 2 Attachments Exhibit A -Table 17 30 030 of the Development Code Exhibit B -Map of General Industrial (GI) District, Subarea 1, and vicinity Exhibit C -Correspondence from George Reynoso • • • H-1 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Section 17 30 030 • Table 17.30.030 Continued -Use Regulations for Industrial Districts LAND USE IP GI I GI GI GI IP IP GI MI/HI GI GI IP GI GI HI IP IP MU/OS USE TYPES SUBAREAS n Tyr i u i i i ~ it '~~ " i du IICI"' I III ~I r'I'II h~b'l~i n 6 fl p..I ~'h I~'~~ il'~r~~i I~' iI'lll~'I~pl~l,~ ~I~ ,li I.II lip ~~ ~ 'I~~ ~ ~ I ~ 1,, ~ ~ ,, I ~~ ,,I .I,,.,.. 'I~ li ~I III C,O ~ I I~ ~I I ~ 1 1 11 ~~ I l l I ~ I' ~ ~ li .IIII IIII I~~d I ~ ~ lill II II~~Ippill il~l~li I d I,IIIII i I~f~ ~~~ ~i~ ~Ilyllhlxlil~l~~lll~~1~111~~11'~IIN'I'I~l~l~~~lilll~l~ip,Q~Illlllll~(I'II~411I~Ili~II~~I~III'III~I~IdVI~~II~l~llill,('I,,I~~ip~q~i~Iill, ,Ilil~~ 6~~iII~~,Vll,l~p ~dli~tll,ir Adult Entertainment H M ~ l~l,pi91 1 F~ .r ~IIIIIIII 2 ~ ~ Nbi116 3 n ' 41111 L rl ~ i, 1~~i1191~11 4 ll^~li ~.I l N lll ,xII~IdIIIId 5 nP' ~ ~ i I I ~IIII~IIII 6 I~IIIII ~ ~ ~ 161 ill ~ I IIII~IIiIIIII A 7 "i~ ~ J I I III~~Ii A 8 ,I III u II ~ I I II~ IIN~Ia~~ A 9 ~i~l i r II I'~I I~~ ,GI 1 I I, i iii l il~i~~~lla~l,I~ A 10 I'IN'~ii 16~p I ~ ~I ~I I~ i i. I~IIIilldl~ A 11 ~I'u, I,~~ , ~ ~~ 7 I dal~~I~ A 12 ll lixi (y'~~ I ~~ ~ hIIIII~~ A 13 ll~~ "i ~~~~ i l~ll,l ~ r bl~,liii A 14 lly' °I Iilll l~, , ,~ ,, ~~~ i lbldlll A 15 "~I '~ , hl l l I ~ I, lillllllll~~, A 16 i~''li' ~i ~ ~ ~ ~ I I ilall~il6i 17 'u ai III itI ~ I I ~G~ I ~~ ~ , l~i~~llhl I 1 II I~ , ~~ ~ 1IIi~ llilllll ~ 8 ~III' 1'~ ,I III i~' .I ,~I ~, ~~iIlIIlllpl l'il~~~~iJ~''llll AgnculturaUNursery Supplies & Services P P P P P P P P ~ ~II~I ~~Illill l~d~~~ Animal Care C C C C C C C C ~I IIII; I~ II~ II'~ill ~ Automotive Fleet Storage C C C C P C C P 1 ' '' i ' il i Automotive Fuel(ng Services C ~ l l Automotive Rental P P P P P P P P P ' ~Il Automotive/Light Truck Repair -Minor P P P P P P P P P I I IIII e air-Ma or P C I I I III Automotive Sales and Leasing u omo ve ervice ou C C C ~ ' ~Iil "~ I ~ ~I Automotive Service Station C C C C C C C C C C C C ~ 'III 'f' Building Contractor's Office & Yards P P P P P P P P P P P Ii II Building Contractor's Storage Yard P P ~ I Maintenance Services ildin B P P P P P P P P P P P P ~ = ' g u Building & Light Equipment Suppiles & Sales P C P C C P P C P C C P ~ ,H Business Supply Retail & Services P* P P P P P P P P P P P P (I I Business Support Services P* P C P P C P P P C P P P P P P ~ il l ' Commurncation Services P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P , ,, III' Convenience Sales & Services C* C C P P C C C C C C i ~ i~ Entertainment C C C C C C C C q ~ Extensive Impact Commercial ast Food Sales financial, Insurance & Real Estate Services C' P P P C P C P C P C C P C C C P C C C C C C P P I~ I ;I~ r ~iI ~ pll' II~~I~ i I'~I~ ~ lil'i Food & Beverage Sales Funeral & Crematory Services Heavy Equpment Sales & Rentals C* C C C C C C C C C C C C C P C C C C C C P C I ' a ,'i ~~i III ~ i,l ce-- t: I! I ('~i ~~,il, '~ jl HoteUMotel Indoor Wholesale/RetaO Commercial P P P C C C C P C C C C 'ti ~ li '', il l i,~yl ~Iil HI,II~ Laundry Services P P P P P P P P ~ ~I ' 1 I~~Ill Medical/Health Care Services P P P P P P P P P P P P 1 i 1 ~ ~ I II I Personal Services C* C P P P P P C P P P i I II ~I I (l~ I II~' I ' ' Petroleum Products Storage C C C C C C y~Ill llil';II I Iii~;,'~ Recreation Facilkies C C C C C C C P C C P P P ' ul;i~l lIljli ~l~ ~~I Repair Services P C P P P P P P P C II~III~ I~~i~I ~P~ , I Restaurants P P P P P P P "' " ''lill , ' Restaurants with Bar or Entertainment C C C C C C C j;'~il~~~';I' , ~~ I;'~' ~ ~ 'Specialty Budding Supplies & Home Improvement P P C I~ ~~ ,I~~I~ I,,II', , ~, II,~ I Warehouse-Style Retail Merchandising *' C i '"i'''llilil~ I"' NOTES IP -Industrial Park HO -Haven Avenue Overlay District GI -General Industrial MI/HI -Minimum Impact Heavy Industrial HI -Heavy Industrial * -Ancillary uses limited to 20 percent of the floor area per Section 17 30 080 5 b ** - Refer to Subarea 12 Special Considerations for additional restrictions P -Permitted Use C -Conditionally Permitted Use ^ -Non-Marked uses not permitted A -Adult Entertainment Zoning Permit Required MU/OS -Mixed Use/Open Space P* -Permitted with Master Plan approval for 35 acres minimum E X H I B I T A H 12 30-8 "'00 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Section 17 30 030 Table 17.30.030 -Use Regulations for Industrial Districts SUMMARY OF LAND 1.~~ TYPE BY SUBAREA 3 USE TYPES LAND USE IP G G GI GI GI IP IP GI MI/HI GI GI IP GI GI HI IP IP MU/oS SUBAREAS hi0 1 21 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Ill1'iliiiil;~i 1~~IId li iu'hihli itiJ°ij Jil ltl i't~' Pii "I'll ~t tll i'li i~lllpil iid~~'nl~i~l'ii.4oill',"~''t6~i~ i~l , I 1 ~ MANUFr4CT ~ G tll'~ 'a,i,lll lij ulllli 111 li l lVll ,III llla ill'' II iIIIIlii tl°'I'h'li;I'jt I ~ I ' ' l~t~~~1l~uli ININNIIII ~iIlIIN IN~9'I'liih~l'~I~1ii~lll l 111 jll I di l!'i iIN~i ..II I~ ~k~lia! I l I ) Custom P P P P P P P P P P P P C P i I Light P P P P P P P P P P P C P Medium C P P` C P P P P P P Heavy a P ~ Minimum Impact Heavy ININ~UIII'lll ~ 1 ' ' .NI 1,~~, ~~;~,~ ~,, ~, ..~.~E,6CJ~P~+R~F.E5,~1 ~'I p Admir>~{y,~C,~„~,w„~,~~,~~„~C,~,w~~~r~, P lu ~ P, P ~ P ~ ~ P P P rv,l t~ u P ~II~~ II ~ C II P ' II C I il C P u"tll ~ P P ProfessionaVDesign Services P PI P P P P C v Research Services ulI,HQLES',~L~~1161'~~AGE;GI~hDISTRIBU~~fQldtillll~~l~9r1~'~I~;IItG'!111~I°,nil{n~IIIIIIII~~N Public Storage hd~ll~~~ ~I~~~~~ l C P ~~ ~~~ 1 I~I~~I P P ~~I~ I~~ C P NIrI~INN~ C P i~~lil~l!IN P ~RPII~~~I P ~N~~~~III~ P ~I~iI~~~~I~fIIIIII~R~h C P l~~illl~ C P ~ C P ~ll ~~ P ~~Illt~~~ P ~I~i~~~~~~ C NI~N~~~~~ P P h~lll~~ P ~ ~ll Light P,R P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P 'tl Medwm ~ C.~ Pl P C P P` P P P P P P P a1Uld Heavy MA'rEI11ALSNREGUYiERY~IFACILITIESInrlll~',,~~61ii~,;~I~CI'ii'Nhi~~!°il' ~~y r "dt;i~lii Collection Facilities ll~N~NI~ ~ I~~~~~~N P>4 ` 1~~~1~ ~~~~Il~lh P P il;l~l~l~li P C ill~l~lN~Ii P G~'~l~~~tl iNo~F9tN ~l~~1~~~l~ P P f~il~~„I~~INfi~i~I P C l~ii~I~~II P ~i~l P ~i~~IliN~ lily~I P NuU~~II~ P P I~III~~~ P ihYa~m'I ~N~~ I , Processing Faclitties C C C C C C C C I Operation rap S c C f I 9 " T ~~~ ~ ,~~ t41~~kNll,~I~11ti~1~N6XN;fi~~~14d~1ir'~4R~1 i~iIN~I~'I~iIIINlilll;liu~li lA~i It 9 i nG' ( i ~ II i Hi 'IT 11114 xLlilN1~ {+ ,~n~ C~VJ~~~~~ ~~ IU~~i1 IINIIII~i~ll ~~~~ II kii ~Ilh~ ~~~ ilM~iu7 7 u+Ih~ pp ~ ~ i~k~i'I'N~ ~~ry Ilil I~t~ iPiil i i w'nl~ 11 41 tt~~J ~~nI~~II~ ~mNl~ fp~ lll ~ III ~~P>~ @ Ih I lil IINI ~ ~INPIII~h ~ 1 dilll~6'i I ~~l~ I ~ I I h Administrative Ciwc Services P P, !, P P P P P P P P P P P ' Convention Centers 'a C C C I I Cultural P i 1 C C P C C Day Care Facility C C;~ C° C C C C C C C C C C C C C I' Iii Emergency Shelter C C C C Extensive Impact Utility Facilities Cry I C C C C C C Flood Control/Utility Comdor P P% P~, P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P I I Public Assembly C C' c C C C C C C C C C C C 1 ~ ' ~ pjj, Public Safety 8 Utility Services Religious Assembly Schools C C C C Cg C° Ct C C C` C U C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C~ I C I C I Ill ~ I' I II I I Il I I ( i 1~~' I~~~I III ' II I iN II 4~1 i~ NOTES IP - Industnal Park ~? ~~ -Permitted Use HO -Haven Avenue Overlay Distract ;µ -Conditionally Permitted Use GI -General Industnal ~ -Non-Marked Uses not permitted MI/HI -Minimum Impact Heavy Industrial -Adult Entertainment Zoning Permit Required HI -Heavy Industnal MU/OS -Mixed Use/Open Space P" -Permitted with Master Pian approval for 35 acre minimum 17 30-7 1 /03 • ~: J H-3 ---trruar.~•~:~zr r'sAfret~-.----~--rrr--.r-- F 4 rn .r zr vFS ~a' £Sly,,,q _ t~ a } 5. ~ ~-` a iS Faz ~ p4 F • ~ ~~ N ~ ~ V4 L ~ `k- ~ ~~~ '~ ~+ 4t ~ V ~ . ^ ~ L : r & - t & ~ H yn} t 43x w'S i ~~ e, ~t n i \~ y^a~ s~ 'aru y ° _ bra .sa ~~ ~ T ~~ . ^~ ~ ~ ~ ~s ~ / V / ~ 1 ~~ ~ ~r ~ (s ~ 1 'b~ 3~ ~ V~d ~ ~ ~ ~ r t T~3'~N` ! '~~ L p p t~: W9 ~. +~ ~ ~N 4 - P ' ~ ~wy+ y 1 9' ~~` 'A ~~ ' ~ - L ,s .a ~ M T{ a ~~ M yq~ T q j~ +, t, '~P ~ ~ k l~~tit~.~.,.~ ~.. tuiA-b r ~"4 - I w ~ yid ~ I 6'.a_ l_ r' 4~~1 i 1~ EXHIBIT F/S MOTORSPORTS, INC. ,AUTO CENTER 8730 Vineyard Avenue • Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909) 920-0650 • (909) 985-0558 fax October 4, 2007 Mr Mike Smith City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Dept 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Re Development Code Amendment Dear Mi Smith The subject property is at 8730 Vineyard Avenue, located on the southwest corner of Ninth Street and Vineyard Avenue Presently this property is being used for the sale of automobile accessories, auto body work, detailing, auto restoration, auto mechanical repairs and a test only smog test station Auto Center has a 3,000 square foot showroom front for indoor vehicle display and outdoor display pads with Vineyard Avenue frontage, allowing the display of vehicles Based on the business generated from local auto enthusiasts, rt is apparent there is a need for this auto center to continue selling special interest vehicles, meeting the demands of the local community To continue auto center will continue to bring many tax dollars to the City of Rancho Cucamonga that would otherwise be going to other areas where specialty vehicles are sold With this letter I respectfully request the consideration of the Crty to amend the development code, allowing the continuance of vehicle sales on these premises • Window tinting•Auto Wody•Repair 8~ Paint•Detailing•Accessories•Stereos•Alarms•Specialty parts EXHIBIT C "~