Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2007/12/12 - Agenda Packet• C7 THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA G'UCAMONGA DECEMBER 12, 2007 - 7:00 PM Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center Council Chambers 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California I. CALL TO ORDER Pledge of Allegiance Roll Call Chairman Stewart_ Vice Chairman Fletcher _ Munoz_ Howdyshell _ Wimberly _ II. ANNOUNCEMENTS III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Regular Meeting Minutes of November 28, 2007 Workshop Minutes of November 28, 2007 IV. CONSENT CALENDAR The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non-controversial They will be acted on by the Commission atone time without discussion If anyone has concern over any item, it should be removed for discussion V. PUBLIC HEARINGS The following items are public hearings rn which concerned indrv~dua/s may voice their opinion of the related project Please wart to be recognized by the Chairman and address the Commission by stating your name and address All such opinions shall be limited to 5 minutes per individual for each project Please s-gn rn after speaking 1 of 5 PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA RANCHO DECEMBER 12, 2007 CUCAMONGA A VARIANCE DRC2007-00491 -RYAN CHANCE - A request to reduce the lot depth from 200 feet to 174 feet and to reduce the rear yard setback from 60 feet to 30 feet in the Very Low Residential District (1 to 2 dwelling units per acre), located at 5836 Buckthorne Avenue Related file Conditional Certificate of Compliance DRC2004-00075 -APN 1062-121- 26 This project is categorically exempt under the Califorrna Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) under Section 15305 -Minor Alterations in Land Use Limitations CONTINUED FROM NOVEMBER 28, 2007 B ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC 2007-00560 -MARTHA BOARDMAN - A request to change the land use designation on 0 40 acres of land located at 7388 Carnelian Street from Medium Residential (8-14 DU/AC) to Neighborhood Commercial - APN 0207-022-07 Related Files Development District Amendment DRC2007-00561 Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration C ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT DRC2007-00561 -MARTHA BOARDMAN - A request to change the zone on 0 40 acres of land located at 7388 Carnelian Street from Medium Residential (8-14 DU/AC) to Neighborhood Commercial - APN 0207-022-07 Related Files General Plan Amendment DRC2007- 00560 Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration D ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND VARIANCE DRC2007-00097- PENINSULA RETAIL PARTNERS, LLC - A request to allow up to 10 5 foot perimeter wall heights for sound attenuation purposes for Lots 1-6 and to allow up to 7 5 foot combination retaining/freestanding sideyard wall heights for grade differential purposes for Lots 1-6 of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18032, where a maximum 6-foot wall height is permitted, for a residential subdivision of 23 single-family lots on 7 74 acres of land in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre) of the Etiwanda North Specific Plan, located on the west side of Day Creek Boulevard, south of Vintage Drive -APN 0225-161-65 and 71 Related Files Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18032 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2006-00871 Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration CONTINUANCE REQUESTED TO AN UNSPECIFIED DATE E ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18032 -PENINSULA RETAIL PARTNERS, LLC - A residential • • • 2of5 • • - PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA DECEMBER 12, 2007 RANCHO CUCAMONGA subdivision of 23 single-family lots on 7 74 acres of land in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre) of the Etiwanda North Specific Plan, located on the west side of Day Creek Boulevard, south of Vintage Drive - APN 0225-161-65 and 71 Related Files Tree Removal Permit DRC2006-00871 and Variance DRC2007-00097 Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration CONTINUANCE REQUESTED TO AN UNSPECIFIED DATE F ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2006-00580 -MARK SATER - A request to construct a commercial center consisting of an auto service court (2,900 square foot gas station with convenience store and carwash) and a fast food restaurant of 1,800 square feet on 2 07 acres of land in the General Industrial (GI) District, Subarea 8 at the southeast corner of Arrow Route and Etiwanda Avenue - APN 0229-141-10 and -11 Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration G ORDINANCE REGARDING TEMPORARY SIGNS - DRC2007-00495 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A review of a draft ordinance amending Sections 14 08 350, 14 16 010(P) and 14 16 020 and adding Chapter 14 25 to the Rancho Cucamonga Murncipal Code concerrnng temporary signs This item will be forwarded to the City Council for final action - CONTINUED FROM SEPTEMBER 26, AND NOVEMBER 14, 2007 CONTINUANCE REQUESTED VI. PUBLIC COMMENTS Thrs rs the time and place for the general publrc to address the commrss-on Items to be drscussed here are those that do not already appear on thrs agenda VII. COMMISSION BUSINESS/COMMENTS VIII. ADJOURNMENT The Planning Commrssron has adopted Admrnrstratrve Regu/at~ons that set an 7 7 00 p m adjournment trine /f rtems go beyond that time, they shall be heard only with the consent of the Commrss-on 3of5 PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA DECEMBER 12, 2007 RANCHO CUCAMONGA 1, Lors J Schrader, Planning Commission Secretary of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on December 6, 2007, at least 72 hours prior to the meeting per Government Code Section 54964 2 at 10500 Civic Center Drrve, Rancho Cucamonga If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate m this meeting, please contact the Planning Department at (909) 477-2750 Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired INFORMATION FOR THE PUBLIC TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION The Planning Commission encourages free expression of all points of view To allow all persons to speak, given the length of the agenda, please keep your remarks brief If others have already expressed your position, you may simply indicate that you agree with a previous speaker If appropriate, a spokesperson may present the views of your entire group To encourage all views and promote courtesy to others, the audience should refrain from clapping, booing or shouts of approval or disagreement from the audience The public may address the Planning Commission on any agenda item To address the Planning Commission, please come forward to the podium located at the center of the staff table State your name for the record and speak into the microphone After speaking, please sign in on the clipboard located next to the speaker's podium It is important to list your name, address and the agenda item letter your comments refer to Comments are generally limited to 5 minutes per individual If you wish to speak concerning an item not on the agenda, you may do so under "Public Comments " There is opportunity to speak under this section prior to the end of the agenda Any handouts for the Planning Commission should be given to the Planning Commission Secretary for distribution to the Commissioners All requests for items to be placed on a Planning Commission agenda must be in writing The deadline for submitting these items is 6 00 p m Tuesday, one week prior to the meeting The Planning Commission Secretary receives all such items • • 4 of 5 .7 r~ PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA RANCHO DECEMBER 12, 2007 C,,UCAMONGA AVAILABILITY OF STAFF REPORTS Copies of the staff reports or other documentation to each agenda item are on file in the offices of the Planning Department, City Hall, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 These documents are available for public inspections dunng regular business hours, Monday through Thursday, 7 00 a m to 6 00 p m ,except for legal City holidays APPEALS Any interested party who disagrees with the City Planrnng Commission decision may appeal the Commission's decision to the City Council within 10 calendar days Any appeal filed must be directed to the City Clerk's Office and must be accompanied by a fee of $1,974 for maps and $2,073 for all other decisions of the Commission (Fees are established and governed by the City Council) Please turn off all cellular phones and pagers while the meeting is in session Copies of the Planning Commission agendas and minutes can be found at http //www c~ rancho-cucamonga ca us 5 of 5 Vicinity Map ~ Planning Commission December 12, 2007 _, ~- Q ~ Meeting Location N City Hall 10500 Civic Center Drive • 11/26/07 City, Hearing # Hearing date My name is Mark McNicholl I live at 9010 Manzanrta Dr ,Alta Loma, Ca, 91701 I hve m the house south of the lot in question I feel compelled to provide the following prior to the public hearing I have been notified of by the city and was informed previous by the property owner that a hearing probably would be required because of the waivers required to building code and city ordinances for this area I wish all of my neighbors the best but I always speak what's on my mind I believe at this point rt is dust as important to keep the city informed formally on the communication between my neighbor and I regarding this matter as well my position on this matter First, attached is the written communication between my neighbor and I upon his request Second, I really don't agree with many of the statements in the subsequent letters from the neighbor m this matter 1 I don't understand how an illegal lot split, if there was one, has anything to do with this now Neither he nor I would be able to build a house the size he wants to build on that lot with waivers m building codes and restrictions m the area 2 How did he get an easement to the back lots Based on the information I've received, I believe those actions were questionable and m a direct attempt to subvert the laws, rules, requirements m the area m order to sub-divide and build on a landlocked lot as well 3 The requested improvements harm the current use value and future sale value of my property if approved Since waivers are required, I do not understand how that could be approved Who will be responsible for compensating me for my loss as a results I moved into this house and lot with what I thought was a clear understanding of the potential development around me-new homes on Wilson, 210 freeway, etc I accepted those improvements because I should have been and was aware of the plans when I moved into this house I expected the lots immediately surrounding my property as well as all the neighboring homes to be fully developed as was based on my understanding of the area, building requirements and lot size requirements for the area, etc There is no way I could have foreseen this I'm sorry for the position my neighbor finds himself now but I don't think I should have to pay m terms of current use value or future value because of his speculation Thank you, sincerely, Mark McNicholl ~t 10/ 10/07 Hello Ryan My name is Mark McNicholl I met you twice, received your letter Sunday, and have given rt a lot of thought since I live at 9010 Manzamta Dr I'm m the house south of the lot m question My wife, Rebecca, and 4 of 5 kids live at home with us Let me respond to your letter as honestly, directly, and kindly as possible Let me start with a little background First, we moved into this house in December 1999 We only moved into the house because of the location and lot The house was in bad shape but we decided it was the best move for our family and that we would remodel the house within 3 years (rt took 6 and we aren't done yet because we dust can't afford to finish it dust yet) Second, the previous owner of your current home/lot approached me informally before they sold the house to you They asked if I would sell an easement on my lot to the back lot behind your house I declined, although we never talked terms, I dust didn't think an easement so that someone who wanted could later build a house back there and have a driveway through my lot/yard was a good idea I heard, don't know for sure, that an owner other than the owner of the house lot combo that you are now in would have to sell or approve an easement for access to the back lot, which I assumed, could then be built on and that's why they were asking I'm not sure how you addressed this However, your letter indicates that, on it's own, rt is a substandard lot so it's not clear to me whether or not someone could build on it even if they had access and met set back requirements That's news to me but makes sense That's one of the main reasons we moved into the area-space between houses I guess that's some of your dilemma now too We love the large lots in the area, which means more room, fewer people/houses per square foot, etc The concerns forme are clear 1 I purchased a little more than I could afford many years ago because of the space between houses, the back yard specifically, because I thought all the new construction that could be built especially immediately around us was done, the location, and my lot specifically We thought the back yard was perfect I didn't think anything immediately around rt could change Our plans to improve the house, which we started a year ago, included capitahzmg on the back yard privacy and view To be honest, your plans change that for our property and our family we think I believe this reduces the current use value and it reduces the resale value of my home I wish you the best but I cannot sign your letter requesting a variance to existing requirements to build m good conscious God bless you and your family too /~ - RANCHO CUCAMONGA Staff Report DATE December 12, 2007 TO Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM James Troyer, City Planner BY Steve Fowler, Assistant Planner SUBJECT VARIANCE DRC2007-00491 -RYAN CHANCE - A request to reduce the lot depth from 200 feet to 174 feet and to reduce the rear yard setback from 60 feet to 30 feet in the Very Low Residential Distract (1 to 2 dwelling units per acre), located at 5836 Buckthorne Avenue Related file Conditional Certificate of Compliance DRC2004- 00075 - APN 1062-121-26 This protect is categorically exempt under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) under Section 15305 - MinorAiterations in Land Use Limitations CONTINUED FROM NOVEMBER 28, 2007 PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION A Project Density 2 dwelling units per acre B Surrounding Land Use and Zoning North - Single-Family Residential/Very Low Residential (1-2 dwelling units per acre) South - Single-Family Residential/Very Low Residential (1-2 dwelling units per acre) East - Single-Family Residential/Very Low Residential (1-2 dwelling units per acre) West - Single-Family Residential/Very Low Residential (1-2 dwelling units per acre) C General Plan Designations Protect Site -Very Low Residential (1-2 dwelling units per acre) North - Very Low Residential (1-2 dwelling units per acre) South - Very Low Residential (1-2 dwelling units per acre) East - Very Low Residential (1-2 dwelling units per acre) West - Very Low Residential (1-2 dwelling units per acre) D Site Characteristics The protect site is surrounded bysingle-family residences and is a land locked parcel with a recorded 20 foot ingress/ egress easement along the south property Ime of 5830 Buckthorn Avenue The site is bounded on all four sides bysingle-family residences with lots ranging from 48,352 to 18,614 square feet All properties to the north, south, east, and west are zoned Very Low Residential (1-2 dwelling units per acre) ANALYSIS • A General The oraginal division of the lot was not executed correctly back m the mid to late 70's thus creating an illegal lot split, ie ,the lot split at the time did not follow the procedures of the ITEM A PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT VARIANCE DRC2007-00491 -CHANCE RESIDENCE December 12, 2007 Page 2 Subdivision Map Act prior to its recordation At the time of the split, the lot depth requirement was met and the rear setback requirement of 30'-0" was m effect The lot split was not detected until the applicant recently submitted plans to improve the lot by constructing a proposed 4,013 square foot residence The applicant has obtained a 20-foot ingress/ egress easement down the south property line of parcel 1062-121-16 to gain access to the land locked subtect parcel In addition the applicant is addressing the illegal lot split by requesting a Certificate of Compliance from the Engineering Division, which is pending approval of the requested Variance The proposed protect consists of the construction of a single family residence with a , 3-story floor plan that would provide 4,013 square feet of living space, 1,180 square feet of garage and workshop space, and a 740 square foot detached RV garage The proposed design configuration minimizes the amount of grading and allows the house to follow the natural grade contours • B Environmental Assessment The Planning Department staff has determined that the protect is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines The protect qualifies as a Class 5 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15305 which covers the minor alteration in land use limitations- setbacks Because the protect only proposes legalizing an existing parcel and no movement of existing lot lines, staff finds that there is no substantial evidence that the protect will have a significant effect on the environment • NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING The results of the neighborhood meeting will be orally reported RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Variance DRC2007-00491 through the adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval with Conditions Respectfully submitted, m~ f~ ~; `~---' James R Troyer, AICP Planning Director JT/SF/Is Attachments Exhibit A -Site Plan Exhibit B -Floor Plans Exhibit C -Building Elevations and Roof Plans Draft Resolution of Approval for Variance DRC2007-00491 • A-1 • CHANCE RESIDENCE 5836 BUCKTHORN AVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA D ~ ~~ j_ RESIDENCE T V T V h H T J r P Y RGR YARD AREA 9,003 SP 90% 0P REAR YARD 900 SF RGR YARD LOVERA6E 4]5 5l ~ 900 51' PLAN ~ ROOF PLAN :'b rrrv uooti -wi awuw ~'`~` Ie~oA73 OrO~1MYtrY~ wa ~.r~+oua+' ~ ~ L ,~ ~ ~ ONk~WPB OQlV~f09 3:)NVFi~ oh a •• 6 3 - @ F p Ye 3 a~ ~~~ Se€4 ~ ~ ~~ € t ~ ~fi ~~ ~~ Bgq ~~kq ~ 4 6 g . °p ~ @e ~tg~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~p~ ~q~~ A 4 ~ E~ ~ e ~g a6 p~4 ~4 Sp9 e~@~ ~ ~~Il~ ~ !~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~~d ~; ~~~ ~~~~ n ~ • r 9 ~~ `'J / U ~~ ~ A-3 a~ep'Wy SZ 6T 6 LOOZ/£T/TT '~Ma 1~13~b2it/J-d02id T-t!\6~~\ X L ~~ ~o ~.. fiYL 00011 JDFk~ 4 ONk~B OQIVNOB 3~P1VFi~ ~, a ,• ~ k Q toy ~ e~ @~~ a[Y ta p Bp A I ~~ ~ ~ y~ q~~ ~$ ~~ i~V~ " d ~ ~ ~ ~( 6~ ~q$ ~6~ eg~5 ~~ [ i ~ ~a ~~ d@ d9i pp~~p a 'E ~ 4~~~ #R~~,~~a ~Rx~~gg ~~ ~~ ~< ~ ~ is ~~ ~ge Bft ~3~ ~~~4 .... s _~ _ 6 R ~ p ~ ~ a ~ g ~ - ~ ~~ 7 $ a ~y 9~ ~@~ a 4 e 9 ~ e $ ~ ~~~ a , 5 y ~ ` • ~~ .. I ~ a j 8. ~ a a3 ~~ ~ 3 ~~ 3 ~ h~ ~ f ------------J --~ z- - - § ~;~ a. 55 I Yi ~ ~ i y i ~ rn nu .~ti ~ .o.~ x ~ t ~ ~ 6 ~ ~ i Y t 66 u ~ah~ 4 j ; a 3 6 ~¢ py 9 •~~6 7~ J pp T F g~g 9 ~ -6a e § i --- i ~ S 9 ¢' ~ g ; : i R 6 J P ~ ~ c ~ A 6 ~ ~' ., Et ..R .u «~. p..~~ . p~ P 1 ~ ~ R t Q ~ E~ ~ A A R ~ ~ ~~ 9r3 ) ~ ~ ~ k~ ~ ~ s a~ ppa ~ ~ y Y~ b yyy .F ~~~ ~ ~ g A 0 6 _ _` _- - i ~ ® ~~~ ®~ A-4 a^eP'Wy £5 8i 6 LOOZ/£i/TT 'JMa 1ST-d02id Z . ~ _ raw uooru o+ooaa ~ __ a~ c , '- Montt a o.~n.,~ruvru '"° ~..,~.~ °°M ~'~!; +, ~ ~ `~ Y Otrk~B OU7VN06 3~H~! 3~NVHJ ~ a . ~ ~ F g pe h Q ~'Y A+~ ~ ~A ~ E3 ~ S ~~ ~~ a g~ ~~~~ eg ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ g~ ~Q ~~ ~~~ °6b ~ ~ F~ ~ i ~ S~ ~p ~~ Agq ~p~tl 666 yy~ ~~e~} ~~Si F~~ A%~ i ry1 7 ~ ~~ ~~ ~ e ~g A~ ~S~ ~~ p~B ~A¢~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ f~ ~~ ~~~ ~4 ~~~ ~~~s ~~ ~' Ica ~~ e ~ ~. ~ ~~ e~ ~ ~ boa : t ~ ~~ g s t ` ~~ r_ ~a ^ ~' ~ ~ A R ~' ~ ~ B ~ A-5 anep'Wy LZ 80 6 LOOZ/ET/TT 'JMa dNZ-d021d d~ `` roc.. ~ o.~o^w.v+. Cxrl~B OQ'iVN08 awuv~ canoe acv Sava 4 ~~~ ~p77 ~ tl ~66~ s Es ~ 5 ~s p ~~ ~ a i~ ~~p~L~[ p 7Y Y~ Y Y 37 Fh FZI A ~¢~ ~?~~~~i ~ ~9 ~ ~ ~8 0 ~~~ g~~a~p~~~ ~y ~~c ~ ~Y ?2r ~~i~~~~~kk~~ kA ~ A A ~A ~~A A ~~~$4 ~a~2~ c~ ~F ~ R~ .x Y ..~ ~x~'f ~ ~6~ ` n A_ 6 aneP 'Wd 90 LO 6 LOOZ/ET/TT '9Ma A313 H1(105-1SH3 8-d\6I~~\ X q L ~~ ..~w.,~oew~. Wd1VIkT0 W!!ON WV 1~IM ~ 4 b4 c •. ~'~` ~ma~v~~ a1 oro~wruvw w'ew.~...~,o.'..~.... °°°~. ~~ ~ ~ . Q- a° • E)fH OO"IYWO9 3~PIVF~J ~ a '• A-] anep'Wy 8T LZ 6 LOOZ/ET/TT 'JMa n313 H12fON-153M a~ ~ \ a.....a..~~o°°'~_ ~ w~ovi~ i aro~~rrvv ONl~~H OQlVN09 ti1011rh7~ Qtr PKY T~J4L736 7KY 1lOOrd ~Y'WO IIH B ~ E p Sq ~ ei @~@ } qq y F ~ ~ ` ee ~5@ ~~p 4 f 2 i g g f a (~ ~ 4 b~ ~~ 1, ig! ~3Ya )~ t ~ ~ S. ~~ g ~ P€ €J ~ 44 tlj ~ ~ ~~ [ a C((t yj~ 9? ~9~ [ tl~ B} ~ egF @ @ ~ p ~ 7 [~ 3 F ip ~ @ ~ 3 ~ 1a ~ @x ~ ~ ~ €$e ~ $ ~ l~ ~ ~ € € 8~ ~ ~ ~€ e ~ ~ ~~ SBa ysY N~~ ~Y~~ gg E € f F § ~~ ~ P $e a~9a ~ 4 a 4 ; ~f ~ ~~ 9 v ~ ~_~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 4~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ (. ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~ R ~g o@e y'g~ ~~ E~~ e~¢~ ~~~ ~ ~°~ ~ ~ e . r e o 0 0; 4444' ~ etgi~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ i~ F~ fRx F4 ~~~ ~~~~ 9 €g € a€@ g e a € _pp€~F~F ~~jPgg i ~~ ~ ~ e~~i ~S[ a ~€ L ~ ~ p~ B ~ . ~ ~ Y ~e 7~a jQi t @e~e tlR~ ~ 4F ~ 6 ~ @ ~ 9 a ~ 1p ~~~~ ~~~ ~~ t~ ~ctl ~ F~ ~~~~& ~~~ 7F @~ 4~ € ~6 9~StS ei 9€€E ~€~~ ~€ g 6E ~X. 5'sP f€o~sg ~B p$~fafae~545 e~E 99@~ 113 k3~ ig SY`~ Fq ~~~¢~€~E e€~F~ ~~~~~fa}c~ ~~p{ a~ 6( ~ p~q ~ Y~ 333 ~ ~e €peS ~~ ~ ~~ ~ a€ ~,3 ~~.a~~~i~~~~ ~g ~~~~~:~~g~~s~€Se~ ~~~-s` u Y ~ a p ~~ \ ~ u} VJ ~$e • `~ s ~ "w .o, u A ~f 7 :~ pp f dy~~ y t { Q b [ 6 ~' F~h A ~" ~{ e ~~~y€y i 9595~ l~ g @@~a~ B$~F ! 43 9 @ ~ ~ " .,u g e~e d~af8 ~ ~ ~ ~ p9 ~ ~ ~~~ q~~ ~ Q p 55 g pp p ~i7~~ ~td~i ~ gyp"p fi ~ , t ~ t iJ Y ~V^ ~` - ~ a / x ' , ~ ' ~ a a y y ' -t ~ ~ i r - ,' ~ j f ' d d `~ ~ .o-n C Y t ~ ' ~ ~ l t { ` ' ^ a , ' '` ' ~ , a r AD 4 D ~ F r ~~ `' - ~ ~~ F r ~, a a ~ A_$ aneP'WV Ob LO 6 LOOZ/EI/TT 'JMa 39d2ib'9~21-d021d b-t1~6 \X RESOLUTION NO 07-73 • A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING VARIANCE DRC2007-00491, A REQUEST TO REDUCE THE REQUIRED LOT DEPTH FROM 200 FEET TO 174 FEET AND TO REDUCE THE REAR YARD SETBACK FROM 60 FEET TO 30 FEET, IN THE VERY LOW (VL) RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, LOCATED AT 5830 BUCKTHORNE AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN 1062-121-26 A Recitals 1 Ryan Chance filed an application for the approval of Variance DRC2007-00491, as described in the title of this Resolution Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Variance request is referred to as "the application " 2 On the 12th day of December 2007, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date 3 All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred B Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of • the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows 1 This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth m the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above referenced public hearing December 12, 2007, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows a The application applies to a parcel that is irregular in shape with overall dimensions of approximately 174 feet from north to south and an average of 119 feet from east to west, and b The existing topography slopes from north to south, and c The lots to the north, south, east and west are zoned Very Low Residential and developed with single-family residences, and d The applicant proposes constructing a three story single-family residence of which 4,013 square feet is living space, 1,180 square feet is garage and workshop space, and a 740 square foot detached RV garage 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above referenced public hearing, and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows a That strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulations would result m practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of the Development Code In that, without a reduction in the lot depth requirement, the applicant would have to loin the site with another lot adjacent lot to the subject site to meet the required lot depth, possibly creating A-9 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 07-73 DRC2007-00491 -RYAN CHANCE December 12, 2007 Page 2 an awkward lot or situation W ithout a reduction in the rear yard setback the applicant would not enjoy the same privilege as adjacent property owners, which would be inconsistent with the intent of the Development Code b That there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the property involved or to the intended use of the property that do not apply generally to other properties in the same district In that, the reduction in the required lot depth from 200 feet to 174 feet is consistent with the average lot depth of the surrounding properties which range from 143 feet to 263 feet The adoption of this application will allow the applicant to create a lot that is similar in size and character to the other lots in the immediate area The reduction of the rear yard setback from 60 to 30 feet will allow the applicant to enjoy the same privilege as adjacent property owners The lot meets the minimum width, and lot size requirements of the Very Low Residential District c That strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the same district In that, without the reduction in the lot depth requirement, the site would have to be joined with another lot adjacent to it to meet the requirement because the lot is land locked and would not be able to obtain the required land to meet the requirement W ithout the reduction to the rear setback the applicant would not be able to enjoy the same privileges as other property owners in the surrounding neighborhood • d That the granting of the variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same district in that, the applicant is requesting to construct a single family residence on the site and the variance is necessary for the • preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property development right possessed by other properties in the same vicinity that are at a similar density e That the granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vianity In that, the legalization of the lot size will be indistinguishable from the surrounding lots other than being land locked 4 Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines The project qualifies as a Class 5 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15305 which covers the minor alteration in land use limitations- setbacks Because the project only proposes legalizing an existing parcel and no movement of existing lot lines, staff finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment 5 Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference PLANNING 1) The rear yard setback on the north side of the property shall not be less than 30 feet from rear property line 2) The west lot line shall not be less than 174 feet in length A10 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 07-73 DRC2007-00491 -RYAN CHANCE • December 12, 2007 Page 3 6 The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 12TH DAY OF December 2007 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY ATTEST Pam Stewart, Chairman James R Troyer, AICP, Secretary I, James R Troyer, AICP, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning • Commission held on the 12th day of December 2007, by the following vote-to-wit AYES COMMISSIONERS NOES COMMISSIONERS ABSENT COMMISSIONERS ABSTAIN COMMISSIONERS • A11 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #. DRC2007-00491 SUBJECT VARIANCE TO REDUCE REAR YARD SETBACK AND LOT DEPTH APPLICANT RYAN CHANCE LOCATION 5836 BUCKTHORNE AVENUE ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS. General Requirements 1 The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the Clty, Its agents, officers, or employees, because of the Issuance of such approval, or In the alternative, to relinquish such approval The appllcant shall reimburse the City, Its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, Its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such actlon The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at Its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve appllcant of his obligations under this condition B. Time Limits Conditional Use Permit, Variance, or Development/Design Review approval shall expire if building permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval No extensions are allowed C. Site Development 1 The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which Include site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, and the Development Code regulations 2 Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the time of building permit issuance ~1-05 I \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2007 Res & Stf Rpt\DRC2007-00491cond12-12 doc Completion Date -~-~- -~-~- -~-~- -~-~- A12 Project No DRC 2007-00491 Completion Date 3 All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc ,shall be _/_/_ located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the Planning Director For single-family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults • D. Building Design 1 Ali dwellings shall have the front, side and rear elevations upgraded with architectural treatment, _/_/_ detailing and increased delineation of surface treatment subject to Planning Director review and approval prior to issuance of building permits E. Landscaping 1 All private slopes of 5 feet or more in vertical height and of 5 1 or greater slope, but less than 2 1 _/_/_ slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for erosion control Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy 2 Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of _/_/_ Xeriscape as defined in Chapter 19 16 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: NOTE ANY REVISIONS MAY VOID THESE REQUIREMENTS AND NECESSITATE ADDITIONAL REVIEW(S) F. Site Development 1 Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction All plans shall be _/_/_ marked with the project file number (i e , DRC2007-00491) The applicant shall comply with the • latest adopted California Codes, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application Contact the Building and Safety Department for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts • I \PLANNING\FINALIPLNGCOMM\2007 Res & Stf Rpt\DRC2007-00491 cond12-12 doc A-13 .~^.~-'_ Crs ~ ~~i _c~ _r;. T H E C I T Y O F ,... _ _.~. _ .-~ ... ~M - __ ,_ ,. - , .- _ - _ ,~~ __, a _~~ ~ _ _.. M ~.-- R A N C II O C U C A M O N G A Stiff Report DATE December 12, 2007 TO Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM James R Troyer, AICP, Planning Director BY Pei-Ming Chou, Associate Planner SUBJECT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC 2007-00560 -MARTHA BOARDMAN - A request to change the land use designation on 0 40 acres of land located at 7388 Carnelian Street from Medium Residential (8-14 DU/AC) to Neighborhood Commercial -APN 0207-022-07 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT DRC2007-00561 -MARTHA BOARDMAN - A request to change the zone on 0 40 acres of land located at 7388 Carnelian Street from Medium Residential (8-14 DU/AC) to Neighborhood Commeraal -APN 0207-022-07 BACKGROUND Prior to the City of Rancho Cucamonga incorporation in 1977, and under the County of San Bernardino jurisdiction, the project site was zoned commercial with an underlying commercial land use designation A commercial building was approved and constructed on the project site in 1978 After the incorporation of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, the land use designation and zone was Medium Residential The applicant is requesting to amend the General Plan land use designation and zone to be consistent with the existing commercial use of the property PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION A Land Use and Zoning Project Site -Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) Proposed -Neighborhood Commercial North -Neighborhood Commercial South -Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) East -Office Professional West -Neighborhood Commercial B General Plan Designations Project Site -Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) Proposed -Neighborhood Commercial North -Neighborhood Commercial South -Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) ITEM B & C PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2007-00560 AND DRC2007-00561 -MARTHA BOARDMAN December 12, 2007 • Page 2 East -Office Professional West -Neighborhood Commercial C Site Characteristics The project site is a developed parcel with an existing medical and professional office building The construction of the building was completed in 1978 and has been in operation since ANALYSIS A General The existing medical and professional building on the project site has been in use since 1978 The current commercial uses operating on the site are inconsistent with the General Plan land use and zoning designations Amending the land use and zoning designations from Medium Density Residential to Neighborhood Commercial would make the designations consistent with the existing commercial uses on the project site and would not conflict with the neighboring uses of the project site This amendment would add an additional 0 40 acres to the existing Neighborhood Commercial zoned properties directly to the north of the project site B Environmental Assessment Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures related to cultural resources, there is no substantial evidence that the protect would have a significant effect on the environment Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared Thereafter, the City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration A Mitigation Monitoring Program has also been prepared to ensure implementation of, and compliance with, the mitigation measures for the project FACTS FOR FINDING The project site is approximately 0 40 acres of land, basically a rectangular configuration, located at 7388 Carnelian Street, and is presently developed with a medical and professional office building The General Plan land use designation and zone for the project site is Medium Density residential, and 2 The property to the north of the subject site is designated Neighborhood Commercial The property to the west is designated Neighborhood Commercial The property to the east is designated Office Professional The property to the south is designated Medium Residential, and 3 The project does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development, within the district, in a manner consistent with the General Pian and with related development, and 4 The project does promote the goals and objectives of the Land Use Element, and 5 The protect would not be materially infurious or detrimental to the adfacent properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties B&C-1 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2007-00560 AND DRC2007-00561 -MARTHA BOARDMAN December 12, 2007 • Page 3 CORRESPONDENCE This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 600-foot radius of the project site RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends adoption of the Mitigated Negative Declaration and attached resolutions recommending approval by the City Council of General Plan Amendment DRC2007-00560 and Development District Amendment DRC2007-00561 Respectfully submitted, ~ n r ~ ~ ~ ~~ 1 Jame R Troyer, AICP Planning Director PC/ds Attachrr~ents Exhibit A -Site Plan Exhibit B -Letter dated June 25, 2007, Requesting Re-designation • Exhibit C -Photo Exhibit Exhibit D -Initial Study Parts I, II, and III Draft Resolution of Approval for General Development District Amendment - DRC2007-00560 Draft Resolution of Approval for Development District Amendment - DRC2007 00561 • B&C-2 z a J a W f- ~ ~ ~ Ln O O 00 N N UU DO F- F- Z Z W W ~ 0 W W as Z E"' QU J~ a~ J ~ ~ ~ W ~ Z Z W W 0 J W W ~¢ .~.'~>;= y ~~ R :~~ J St m I W U a 0 0 H w a J W U M W U a r~ ~~ UJ aa_ ~U ~~ ~~ 00 ~ J ~ F- ~ O wo o~ ~O Wm ~_ ~w Wz ~ ~ ~z wp ZN O~ NZ Z O OQ t=- z a c~ ~~ ~o wW ~y W ~ N~ oQ Z J J W z0 Ha NO X~ w °- L EXHIBIT - A B&C-3 JUNE 25, 2007 TO THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 10500 CIVIC CENTER DR P O BOX 807 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91729-0807 c/o CITY PLANNING COMMISSION ATTN PLANNING DIRECTOR SUBJECT DRC2007-00417 LAND USE VERIFICATION LETTER FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 7388 CARNELIAN STREET - AN 0207-022-07 DEAR DIRECTOR PURSUANT TO WHAT I FEEL IS A ILLEGAL ZONE CHANGE, LISTED BUT NOT IN ANY ORDER ARE AS FOLLOW 1 THE PROPERTY AT THE TIME WAS ZONED BY THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO 2 ALL PERMITS & FEES WERE PAID, AND APPROVED BY THE COUNTY BETWEEN 1978 & 1984 AFTER COMPLETION, ACCORDING TO PICTURES IN THE NEWSPAPER, THE BUILDING WAS TO BE FINISHED JAN 1, 1978 THE NEWLY FORMED CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DECIDED TO CHANGE THE ZONING, FROM COMMERCIAL TO MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL AFTER THE BUILDING WAS LESS THAN ONE YEAR OLD TO FIVE YEARS OLD EVEN THE CITY DOESN'T KNOW. NOT ONLY WAS IT CHANGED NO ONE CAN PRODUCE A DOCUMENT TO THE FACT THAT MY DAD WHO BUILT SUNRIZE CENTER WAS EVER NOTIFIED OR HAD A CHANCE TO APPEAL THAT DECISION. 4 MY FATHER BOUGHT THAT LOT WHILE BUILDING AT SUNRIZE CENTER, AT THE TIME THE PROPERTY WAS PART OF SUNRIZE CENTER, WHICH IS STILL ZONED COMMERCIAL 5 THIS IS THE FIRST TIME IN ALMOST 30 YEARS THAT THIS PROPERTY HAS BEEN SOLD SUNRIZE CENTER HAS NEVER BEEN SOLD 6 THIS ZONE CHANGE IS CREATING A HARDSHII' ON ALL PARTIES INVOLVED 7 THIS PROPERTY IS IN ESCROW WHERE WE FOUND THE HOPEFULLY OVER LOOKED ZONE CHANGE 8 THE NEW BUYER' S HAVE PUT UP $ 5,000 00 AND PAID FOR THE APPRAISAL WHERE WE FOUND THE ZONE CHANGE 9 ACCORDING TO YOUR LETTER DATED JUNE 21, 2007, IF THE BUILDING BURNED DOWN WITH MORE THAN 50 0/o DAMAGE IT CAN NOT BE REBUILT 10 I HAVE BUILDING Il~tSURANCE FOR RECONSTRUCTION IN CASE THE BUILDING IS DESTROYED THE NEW CONSTRUCTION WOULD BE BROUGHT UP TO ANY NEW CODES AT THAT TIME I HAVE BEEN PAYING A HIGHER PREMIUM FOR A LONG TIME FOR THIS PLUS RELOCATING OUR RENTERS UNTIL THE NEW BUILDING EXHIBIT - B B&C-4 WOULD BE BUILT NOW I FIND I'VE BEEN WASTING MY MONEY FOR A POLICY . THAT WOULD BE WORTHLESS 11 I JUST DO NOT SEE ANY REASQN MORLEY OR LEGALLY TO CHANGE A PROPERTY THAT IS VALUED AT ALMOST $ 1,000,000 00 AND BECAUSE SOME ONE CHANGED THE ZONING IT IS NOW WORTH LESS THAN $200,000 00, IF THAT, AND WITH TODAYS CODE MAY NOT EVEN BE BUILDABLE 12 THIS WAS ORIGINALLY PART OF SUNRIZE CENTER PROPERTY IT IS A SMALL PARCEL SANDWICHED BETWEEN THE SHOPPING CENTER AND A MASSIVE 30 UNIT FOURPLEX DON'T KNOW OF ANYONE THAT WOULD WANT TO BUILD A SINGLE HOME ON IT AND ON CARNELIAN STREET, A MAIN NORTH & SOUTH ARTERY A LOT OF SPEEDING TRAFFIC, AND DELIVERY TRUCKS TO THE NORTH 13 ALL WE ARE ASKING IS THAT YOU PU'T IT BACK TO COMMERCIAL WE ARE NOT ASKING TO ENLARGE IT JUST TO BE ABLE TO REBUILD IT 1F IT BURNT DOWN OR DESTROYED BY A ACT OF GOD OR WHATEVER WITH THAT, MY TENANTS AND I WOULD BE HAPPY 14 RIGHT NOW THERE ARE 5 OF US PAYING BUSINESS LICENSES, IF IT WOULD GO TO R-1 OR R-2 NO BODY WOULD BE PAYING YEARLY FEES 15 THE PROPERTY WHICH I SAID BEFORE IS IN ESCROW WITH A CONTINENCY THAT THE CITY WILL WRITE A LETTER STATING THAT NO FAULT OF THEIRS THEY WILL MAKE THIS ZONING BE MADE RIGHT AND THE SALE CAN MOVE ON THIS WOULD MEAN HIGHER TAXES FOR THE CITY 16 WE HAVE BEEN MAKING PROPERTY TAX PAYMENTS TO THE COUNTY FOR ALMOST 30 YRS AND NEVER HAVE THEY EVER SAID IT WAS NOT ZONED FOR THE MEDICAL OFFICES WHICH BUILDING PERMITS AND PROPERTY TAXES HAVE BEEN PAID AND ARE CURRENT. THE COUNTY STILL HAS IT LISTED AS A COMMERCIAL PIECE OF PROPERTY WITH THE MEDICAL BUILDING BEING APPROVED THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA OBVIOUSLY DID NOT NOTIFY THE COUNTY OF ITS CHANGES EITHER 17 LAST BUT NOT LEAST THE ZONE SHOULD BE CHANGED ON LINE ITEM #2 '/Z OF THE PROPERTY IS ON R-1 (THE DRIVE WAY) THE OTHER 1/2 IS ON C-1 (THE BUILDING ITS SELF. IF YOU AGREE WITH T~-IAT JUST TELL ME THE BUILDING IS C-1 OR COMMERCIAL) SINCERELY, ATHA D & ANNIE M ADDISON TRUST MARTHA BOARDMAN, TRUSTEE • B&C-5 - ;ite ~hc~tac~r~hs ~xhi~ ~• EXHIBIT - C it g; _~~~ SUBJECT PROPERTY Borrower Addison Trust Fde N. 7738 Carnelian Property Address 7738 Carnelian Street Case No City Rancho Cucamonga State CA Zip 91730 Lender The Mortgage Gwld r~ ~ f~~~~~ ~~ -ir r x ~ ~ ~ '` a: o n~ '~_~ 4 r ~x Y ~ Y tA ~ I r x ~ ~~ lF ~° ~ N 1f 4~k' %h S ~ A r + Y4li P ~ t5 LL 1 ~i b~fi'" v m n~ NORTH FROM SUBJECT SITE #1 EAST FROM SUBJECT SITE #2 ~: • • B&C-7 Borfowef Addison Trust Flle N~ l738 Carnelian Pfoperty AddreSS 7738 Carnelian Street Case No Gty Rancho Cucamonga Slate CA Zip 91730 Lender The Mort a e Gwld • SOUTH FROM SUBJECT SITE #3 WEST FROM SUBJECT SITE #4 B&C-8 Borrower Addison Trust Ftle N~ I738 Carnelian Property Address 7738 Carnelian Street Case No City Rancho Cucamonga Stale CA Zip 91730 Lender The Mort a e Guild -~_ LOOKING SOUTHWEST FROM THE CORNER POINT ALONG CARNELIAN #5 LOOKING NORTHWEST FROM THE CORNER POINT ALONG CARNELIAN #6 ~: • • B&C-9 Bofrower Addison Trust File N~ 1738 Carnelian Property AddreSS 7738 Carnelian Street Case No City Rancho Cucamonga State CA Zip 91730 Lender The Mort a e Gwld • _r LOOKING NORTHEAST FROM THE REAR CORNER POINT OF THE SITE #7 LOOKING SOUTHEAST FROM THE REAR CORNER POINT OF THE SITE #8 B&C-10 Borrower Addison Trust Fde h 7738 Carnelian Property Address 7738 Carnelian Street Case No CrtV Rancho Cucamonga Slate CA Zip 91730 Lender The Mortgage Guild ru ~ r sus, ~ '" r ~i ~ i~w ~~~a ~ ~ (, w n ~ . ~~ ''~ 7~j, y~,}},~~ ~~ +t i ~n~4f~ M'E I !r ut,~ n .•.~5. -- t ~ ~ § J ~ a -rw.~ ,w, - ,~p~ ~ ~a~' !°~ ~ i PTr 'S~^`^~ ~~ STREET PICTURE LOOKING NORTH ALONG CARNELIAN STREET #9 STREET PICTURE LOOKING SOUTH ALONG CARNELIAN STREET #10 • B&C-11 Borrower Addison Trust File N 7738 Carnelian Property Address 7738 Carnelian Street Case No City Rancho Cucamonga State CA Zip 91730 Lender The Mort a e Gwld • • FRONT OF SUBJECT PROPERTY #11 REAR OF SUBJECT BUILDING #12 B&C-12 • ~~I?~-'~ ENVIRONMENTAL ~ INFORMATION FORM ~.,~ ~:~. '~~~~~~' (Part I -Initial Study) aty oiRancho Cucamonga (Please type or pant clearly using mk Use fhe tab key to move from one Irne to the next !me ) Planning Division (909) 477 2750 The purpose of thas form is to inform the City of the basic components of the proposed project so that the City may review the project pursuant to City Policies, Ordinances, and Guidelines; the California Environmental Quality Act; and the City's Rules and Procedures to Implement CEQA It is important that the information requested in this application be provided in full. • lJpon review of the completed Initial Study Part I and the development application, additional information such as, but not limited to, traffic, noise, biological, drainage, and geological reports may be required. The project application will not be deemed complete unless the identified special studieslreports are submitted for review and accepted as complete and adequate, The project application will not be scheduled for Committees' review unless all required reports are submitted and deemed complete for staff to prepare the Initial Study Part II as required by CEQA. In addition to the filing fee, the applicant will be responsible to pay or reimburse the City, its agents, officers, and/or consultants for all costs for the preparation, review, analysis, recommendations, mitigations, etc., of any special studies or reports. INCOMPLETE APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE PROCESSED Please note that rt rs the responsrbdrty of the applicant to ensure that the appl~catron is complete at the time of submittal, Crty staff wdI not be avertable to perform work required to provide missing information Application Number for the project to which this form pertains Protect Title /`~ Lrj~~~mO'J7QCL, ~/'1~/rQ./ ~ ~i~D Name & Address of project owner(s) ~~~~~~~~g-jam l~~ ~a , M, ~~ ~ ~ ate- f hQ ,~~u c~.rd'n~ cZ,r1 , ~i-~~~e cam. ~~ Name & Address of developer or project sponsor • EXHIBIT - D I \PLANNING\FINAL\FORMS\COUNTER1lnitial Study Part1 docPage 1 Rev 3!17/04 B&C-73 Contact Person & Address • Name & Address of person preparing this form (~f different from above) Telephone Number - ~~~~ Information indicated by an asterisk (*) is not required ofnon-construction CUP's unless otherwise requested by staff *9) Provide a full scale (8-1/2 x 77) copy of the USGS Quadrant Sheet(s) which includes the project site, and indicate the site boundaries 2) Provide a set of color photographs that show representative views into the site from the north, south, east, and west, views into and from the site from the primary access points that serve the site, and representative views of significant features from the site Include a map showing location of each photograph 3) Project Location (describe) 'tJ~ ~/~ ~~.~~~ /L~ y~ ~r'~ a !1 / U C , "02CJ i0 • 4) Assessor's Parcel Numbers (attach additional sheet if necessary) ~ o~a~ 7-6a a -©7 *5) moss Site Area (ac/sq ft ) *6) Net Srte Area (total site size minus area of public streets & proposed dedications) ;~ ~~ F / ~/7 <i tt9~ ~~L~ • I \PLANNING\FINALIFORMSICOUNTER\Initial Study Part1 docPage 2 of 10 Rev 3/17/04 B&C-14 7) Describe any proposed general plan amendment or zone change which would affect the pro/ect site (attach additional sheet if necessary) ,~ ~,~ 8) Include a description of all permits which wdl be necessary from the Crty of Rancho Cucamonga and other governmental agen~ci~es in order to fully implement the project • 9) Describe the physical setting of the site as rt exists before the project including information on topography, sort stability, plants and animals, mature trees, trails and roads, drainage courses, and scenic aspects Describe any existing structures on site (~nclud~ng age and condrfion) and the use of the structures Attach photographs of significant features described In addifion, cite all sources of information (r a ,geological and/or hydrologic studies, biotic and archeological surveys, Traffic studies) ~"? 70) Describe the known cultural and/or historical aspects of the site Crfe all sources of rnformatron (books, published reports an~~d~~ oral history) ~ / / Q 5 ~ oy'! ~, ? S P~LLi~' ~ ~~~~ r~ I 1PLANNING\FINAL\FORMS\COUNTER\Initial Study Part1 docPage 3 of 10 Rev 3/17/04 B&C-15 11) Describe any Horse sources and their levels that now affect the site (aircraft, roadway Horse, etc) and how they will affect proposed uses ~ 12) Describe the proposed project rn detail Thrs should provide an adequate description of the site in terms of ultimate use that will result from the proposed project Indicate rf there are proposed phases for development, the extent of development to occur with each phase, and the anticipated completion of each increment Attach additional sheet(s) if necessary .--~- ' i i • • 13) Describe the surrounding properties, including information on plants and animals and any cultural, historical, or scenic aspects Indreate the type of land use (residential, commercial, etc ), intensity of land use (one-family, apartment houses, shops, department stores, etc) and scale of development (height, frontage, setback, rear yard, etc ) /zo ~~~ fo f"/~ e.. /~orl~/z - /1/C 14) Will the proposed project change the pattern, scale, or character of the surrounding general area of the pro~ect~ O -- C7 I \PLANNING(FINAL\FORMSICOUNTER1lnitial Study Part1 docPage 4 of 10 Rev 3/17/04 B&C-16 • 15) Indreate the type ofshort-term and long-term Horse to be generated, rncludrng source and amount How will these Horse levels affect adjacent properties and on-site uses What methods of soundproofing are proposed ~~~ ~ "`16) Indreate proposed removals and/or replacements of mature or scenic trees J~~~~ ~ 17) Indreate any bodies of water (rncludrng domestic wafer supplies) into which the site drams ' /, ,, / ~~ l'OC.L C/~~ iDG~l ~'/~/ /"~ GI ~C7~ l ~? O /~ C~ l C~~ ~. 18) Indreate expected amounf of water usage (See Attachment A for usage estimates) For further clanficabon, please contact the Cucamonga Valley Wafer Drstnct at 987-2591 a Residential (gal/day) Peak use (gal/Day) b Commercral/Ind (gal/day/ac) Gl /'c OGU/~ ~Pea~e (gal/min/ac) 19) Indreate proposed method of sewage disposal~y ^ Septic Tank Q'Sewer If septic tanks are proposed, attach percolation tests If discharge to a sanitary sewage system rs proposed indicate expected daily sewage generation (See Attachment A for usage estimates) For further clarification, please contact the Cucamonga Valley Water Drstnct at 987-2591 a Residential (gal/day) b Commercral/Industrial (gal/day/ac) RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS: 20) Number of resrden6al urnts Detached (Indreate range of parcel sizes, minimum lof size and maximum lot size Atfached (rndreate whether units are rental or for sale units) I \PLANNING\FINAL\FORMS\COUNTER\Initial Study Part1 docPage 5 of 10 Rev 3/17104 B&C-17 27) Anticipated range of sale paces and/or rents Sale Price(s) $ to $ Rent (per month) $ to $ • 22) Specify number of bedrooms by unit type 23) Indicate anticipated household size by unit type 24) Indicate the expected number of school children who will be resrdmg within the project Contact the appropriate School Drstricfs as shown rn Attachment B a Elementary b Junior High c Senior High COMMERCIAL. INDUSTRIAL, AND INSTITUTIONAL PROJECTS 25) Describe type of use(s) and mayor function(s) of commercial, industrial or institutional uses ~~ f ! ~ S~ 26) Total floor area of commercial, industrial, or institutional uses by type ~%~Q ~.4 n~ ~ ~ ~ __ 27) Indreate hours of operation %~~~ ~~, / ~.. ~a i // ~( ~~~ f r~~~ ~ a.~ rm - ~ev~ d 28) Number of employees Total Maximum Shift Time of Maximum Shift I \PLANNINGIFINALIFORMS\COUNTER1lnitial Study Part1 docPage 6 of 10 B&C-18 ~~L~ /s ~- rn /"D ~ t/o 49" • Rev 3/17/04 29) Provide breakdown of anfrcrpated~ob classifications, including wage and salary ranges, as well as an indication of the rate o1 nrre for eta/ch classification (attach additional sheet rf necessary) L!/2 f ` !~ ~L~.~ Yl • • 30) Estimation of the number of workers to be hued that currently reside rn the Crty ~n~/~CSG,r~~ "31) For commercial and industrial uses only, indicate fhe source, type, and amount of air pollution emissions (Data should be verified through the South Coast Arr Quality Management District, at (818) 572-6283) ALL PROJECTS 32) Have the water, sewer, fire, and flood control agencies serving the project been contacted to determine their abrl~fy to provide adequate service to the proposed pro~ect~ If so, please rndreate their response ~ i 33) In the known history of this property, has there been any use, storage, or discharge of hazardous and/or foxrc mafena/s~ Examples of hazardous and/or toxic materials include, but are not limited fo PCB's, radioacfive substances, pest~crdes and herbicides, fuels, oils, solvents, and ofher flammable liquids and gases Also note underground storage of any ofthe above Please Irst the materials and describe their use, storage, and/or discharge on the property, as well as the dates of use, rf known /~~~, • I 1PLANNING\FINAL\FORMS\COUNTER\Initial Study Part1 docPage 7 of 10 Rev 3/17/04 B&C-19 34) Wrll the proposed project involve the temporary or long-term use, storage, or discharge ofhazardous and/ortoxrc matenats, including but not l~m~ted to those examples listed above ~ /f yes, provide an inventory of all such materials to be used and proposed method of disposal The location of such uses, along with the storage and shipment areas, shall be shown and labeled on the application plans /''/~ • I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for adequate evaluation of this pro/ect to the best of my ability, that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct tot he best of my knowledge and belief 1 further understand that additional information maybe required to be submitted before an adequate evaluation can be made by the City of Rancho Cucamonga Date +bl ~,~ ~lJc'~ Signature Tale • I \PLANNING\FINAL\FORMS\COUNTER\Initial Study Part1 docPage 8 Rev 3/17/04 B&C-20 / poZone -Don Tiburcio Tapia State Park, USGS GUASTI (CA) California Topo Map Page 1 of 1 7 • r~ u ~ -- ;~ ,~ ~ ~ 7f IY 11iF ~ ^ ^ ^ k f^t f t,t.R Iril~'! ~ ^~ z,~=.- TLL - - ~ ; )"yd •x Cay,,gn,i~.~,q-,iap~aYearta l^^c1 r ^~ ^ ~ sr ^ ~a if r ~etia'~ *~a # ^ wy IaraY MCI ri y-r ~ v .a ~~'a- u~ ~ ^ ! * r ~ w ~ ^ a+ • a• ^ a w r !~ ~'.~..~ L~.~ , , k~.~~.,F A ~,,,. _ s~,_ ~ } ~ aSti,~4 r ~#1 ~ •~i ^rl it~^+i11 1i s ! ~~~ !t• ^^}li~~'~'M~~Ikll~ihlh5* t~1 ~ i~~ w ~•'hyy,Y1 ^ A t~ ii ~~' *~~ ^ ^ •Y iri•Ey~^i^~,r~f'IfM~ ~~ * r~ R* -~Ca'~ ~' % .; ~la~~ f^ ~:a^alatiN+a+r`^ ^'~ (( 11 ,,L ~~ ~ra ~ ti t +~r ~~ ^ ~ ~ ` r l ~,...~ k k ~I i f Jt i i ~,~ ` ~~~~YJ ,~~ ~~~ ~~~~ r ~ ~~~.+f "'~t 11 ~ t~ ~r~l ~ L ~ , ~ ''~V ,, _ r~~ <y ~ .mac ~ ` 1~ ~ „ ' ~ ~ ~ G - ~"I ~ ~ ,4 ~ J +~ ~, ~ ~ _'r ' "LK"yam iii i = ; _ _ '- ^ _T_ EE) q ~9 { A ~. ~ { ,~ ,~ ~ , M1 1 =j F ~ ~~ ~~ r~ ~ ~ ~ ~'~~ ~ ~r'"r ^ ar,^ Ira a r~~ s ~ ! ^ r F~~ 'f ~ ~5=- ~--=--1 ~~ ,~~.~~ i Y '`e ~ r, ^ ly`~ '~ty.~'•11 R _ ~ J ~ f , # }~ ~, ~ w 0 0 1 0 2 0 3 0 4 0 5 km 0 0 09 0 18 0 27 0 36 0 45 mi UTM 11 443144E 3775347N (NAD27) Don Tiburcio Tapia State Park, USGS GUASTI (CA) Quadrangle Projection is UTM Zone 11 NAD83 Datum http //www topozone coin/pnnt asp~lat=34~ 1~1~~21>n=-117 61652&s=24&layer=DRG&d ~} G t 1=13 556 G=-0.346 8/1/2007 City of Rancho Cucamonga ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM INITIAL STUDY PART it BACKGROUND Project Files GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2007-00560 AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT DRC2007-00561 Description of Protect GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2007-00560 -MARTHA BOARDMAN - A request to change the General Plan designation from Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) to Neighborhood Commercial for an existing commercial development, located on the west side of Carnelian Street, dust south of Base Line Road -APN 0207-022-07 Related File Development District Amendment DRC2007-00561 DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT DRC2007-00561 -MARTHA BOARDMAN - A request to change the zone from Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) to Neighborhood Commercial for an existing commercial development, located on the west side of Carnelian Street, dust south of Base Line Road -APN 0207-022-07 Related File General Plan Amendment DRC2007-00560 3 Project Sponsor's Name and Address A D Addison & A M Addison Trust Martha Boardman -Trustee P O Box 3 Helendale, CA 92342-0003 5 General Plan Designation Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) 6 Zoning Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) 7 Surrounding Land Uses and Setting Commercial Center (Sunrise Center) to the north, multi-family residential to the south, a professional and commercial plaza to the east, and a public parking lot to the west 8 Lead Agency Name and Address City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 9 Contact Person and Phone Number Pei-Ming Chou, Associate Planner (909) 477-2750 10 Other agencies whose approval is required (e g , permits, financing approval, or participation agreement) None B&C-22 Initial Study for DRC2007-00560, DRC2007-00561 GLOSSARY -The following abbreviations are used in this report CVW D -Cucamonga Valley Water District EIR -Environmental Impact Report FEIR -Final Environmental Impact Report NPDES -National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System NOx -Nitrogen Oxides ROG -Reactive Organic Gases PM,o -Fine Particulate Matter RWQCB -Regional Water Quality Control Board SCAQMD -South Coast Air Quality Management District SWPPP -Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan URBEMIS7G -Urban Emissions Model 7G ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 2 The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this protect, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact," "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated," or "Less Than-Significant-Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages OAesthetics O Agricultural Resources OAir Quality ()Biological Resources (/) Cultural Resources ()Geology & Soils ()Hazards & Waste Materials ()Hydrology & Water Quality ()Land Use & Planning ()Mineral Resources ()Noise ()Population & Housing ()Public Services ()Recreation () TransportationlTraffic ()Utilities & Service Systems ()Mandatory Findings of Significance DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation () I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared (/) I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by, or agreed to, by the project proponent A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared () I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required () I find that the proposed project MAY have a "Potentially Significant Impact" or "Potentially Significant Unless Mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standard and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed () I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects 1) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE~DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and 2) have been avoided or mitigated .,pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation r~easu~s that are imposed upon the proposed project, nothing further is required Prepared By Date i-I« l o~- Reviewed By ~/-1 Date ~~/„~~0,~ B&C-23 • • • Initial Study for DRC2007-00560, DRC2007-00561 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 3 Less Than Signdicant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources Pp g Potentially Significant w~tn Mingahon Than Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS 1 AESTHETICS Would the project a) Have a substantial affect a scenic vistas () () () (/) b) Substantially damage scenic resources, fncludfng, but () () () (/) not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a State Scenic Highway c) Substantfally degrade the existing visual character or () () () (/) quality of the site and fts surroundings d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare, () () () (/) which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? Comments a) There are no significant vistas within or adjacent to the project site The site fs not within a view corridor according to General Plan Exhibit III-15 • b) The project site contains no scenfc resources and no historic buildings wfthfn a State Scenic Highway There are no State Scenic Highways within the Cfty of Rancho Cucamonga c) The site is located on the west side of Carnelian Street, dust south of Base Line Road and is characterized by commercial development to the north and east, residential development to the south, and a public parking lot to the west The visual quality of the area will not degrade as a result of this project No physfcai changes to the project site or to any existing buildings located on the site will occur as part of this project d) An existing medical and professional building fs located on the project site The scope of the project does not include the alteration of any existing uses or the addition of new uses on the project site Therefore, the project will not create a new source of substantial light or glare that would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area • 2 AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES Would the project a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or () () () (/) Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural uses b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a () () () (/) Williamson Act contract c) Involve other changes in the existing environment, () () () (/) which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural uses B&C-24 Initial Study for DRC2007-00560, DRC2007-00561 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 4 Less Than Signficant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources Ph g Potentially Significant with Mitigation Than Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Comments a) The site is not designated as Prime Farmlands, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance The site is located on the west side of Carnelian Street, dust south of Base Line Road and is characterized by commercial development to the north and east, residential development to the south, and a public parking lot to the west There are approximately 1,300 acres of Prime Farmlands, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance within the City of Rancho Cucamonga, of which about one-third is either developed or committed to development according to General Plan Table IV-2 The mayor concentrations of designated farmlands are located in the southern and eastern portions of our City that is characterized by existing and planned development Further, two-thirds of the designated farmlands parcels are small, ranging from 3 acres to 30 acres, and their economic viability is doubtful, therefore, they are not intended to be retained as farmland in the General Plan Land Use Plan The General Plan FEIR identified the conversion of farmlands to urban uses as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council The proposed protect is consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated b) There is no agriculturally zoned land within the City of Rancho Cucamonga There are no Williamson Act contracts within the City c) The site is located on the west side of Carnelian Street, lust south of Base Line Road and is characterized by commercial development to the north and east, residential development to the south, and a public parking lot to the west The nearest agricultural use is more than 1 75 mile southeast from the protect site Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated 3 AIR QUALITY Would the protect a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the () () () (/) applicable air quality plan b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute () () () (/) substantially to an existing or protected air quality violabon~ c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of () () () (/) any criteria pollutant for which the protect region is non-attainment under an applicable Federal or State ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions that exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant () () () (/) concentrations? e) Create obtectionable odors affecting a substantial () () () (/) number of people Comments a) As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 6), continued development will contribute to the pollutant levels m the Rancho Cucamonga area, which already exceed Federal and State standards The General Plan FEIR identified the citywide increase in emissions as • • B & C- 25 • Initial Study for DRC2007-00560, DRC2007-00561 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 5 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources hh g Potentially Significant With Mitigation Than Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council The proposed protect is consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated b) An existing commercial plaza is located on the protect site The scope of the protect does not include the alteration of any existing uses or the addition of new uses on the protect site No construction activities are proposed for the protect site Therefore, the protect will not violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or protected air quality violation c) As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 6) continued development would contribute to the pollutant levels in the Rancho Cucamonga area, which already exceed Federal and State standards The General Pian FEIR identified the citywide increase in emissions as a significant and adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council The protect proposed is consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated • d) Sensitive receptors are defined as populations that are more susceptible to the effects of pollution than the population at large The South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) identifies the following as sensitive receptors long-term health care facilities, rehabilitation centers, convalescent centers, retirement homes, residences, schools, playgrounds, child care centers, and athletic facilities According to the SCAQMD, protects have the potential to create significant impacts if they are located within 1/4 mile of sensitive receptors and would emit toxic air contaminants identified in SCAQMD Rule 1401 The protect site is located within 1/4 mile of a sensitive receptor Potential impacts to air quality are consistent with the Public Health and Safety Super-Element within the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan An existing commercial plaza is located on the protect site No construction activities are proposed for this protect Therefore, the protect will not expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations e) The existing uses on the protect site do not create obtectionable odors The propose protect will not add new uses to the protect site No adverse impacts are anticipated • 4 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES Would the pro/ect a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or () () () (/) through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U S Fish and Wildlife Service b) Have a substantial adverse effect on riparian habitat () () () (/) or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service B&C-26 Initial Study for DRC2007-00560, DRC2007-00561 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 6 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources hp g Potentially Signdicant w~tn Mitigation Than Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally () () () (/) protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native () () () (/) resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances () () () (/) protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat () () () (/) Conservation Plan, Natural Community conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or State habitat conservation piano Comments a) The project site is located in an area developed with commercial and residential uses The site has been previously disrupted during construction of infrastructure and surrounding developments According to the General Plan Exhibit IV-3, and Section 5 3 of the General Plan FEIR, the project site is not within an area of sensitive biological resources, therefore, development will not adversely affect rare or endangered species of plants or animals because of the fact that the project is surrounded by urbanized land uses and is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Plan b) The project site is located m an urban area with no natural communities No riparian habitat exists on-site, meaning the project wail not have any impacts c) No wetland habitat is present on-site As a result, project implementation would have no impact on these resources d) The majority of the surrounding area has been or is being developed, thereby, disrupting any wildlife corridors that may have existed No adverse impacts are anticipated e) An existing commercial plaza is located on the project site The scope of the project does not include the alteration of any existing uses or the addition of new uses on the project site No construction activities are proposed for the project site Therefore, the project will not conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance f) The project site is not located within a conservation area according to the General Plan, Open Space and Conservation Plan, Exhibit IV-4 No conflicts with habitat conservation plans will occur • • • B&C-27 Initial Study for DRC2007-00560, DRC2007-00561 • City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 7 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Su ortm Information Sources PP g Potentially Significant w~tn Mitigation Than Signdicant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact 5 CULTURAL RESOURCES Would the project a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the () () () (/) significance of a historical resource as defined in § 15064 5~ b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the () (/) () ( ) significance of an archeological resource pursuant to § 15064 5~ c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological () (/) () ( ) resource or site or unique geologic feature d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred () () () (/) outside of formal cemeteries Comments a) The project site has not been identified as a "Historic Resource" per the standards of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 2 24 (Historic Preservation) There will be no impact • b) There are no known archaeological sites or resources recorded on the project site, however, the Rancho Cucamonga area is known to have been inhabited by Native Americans according to the General Pian FEIR (Section 5 11) Construction activity, particularly grading, soil excavation and compaction, could adversely affect or eliminate existing and potential archaeological resources The scope of this project does not include the alteration of any existing uses or the addition of riew uses on the project site and no construction activities are proposed However, the following mitigation measures shall be implemented if any archaeological sites or resources are encountered 1) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will • Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value • Consider establishing provisions to require incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point • Pursue educating the public about the archaeological heritage of the area • Propose mitigation measures and recommend conditions of approval to eliminate adverse project effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, following appropriate CEQA guidelines • Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the • inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the protect area Submit one copy of the completed report with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving B&C-28 Initial Study for DRC2007-00560, DRC2007-00561 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 8 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources Ph g Potentially Significant With Mitigation Than SgniOcant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact c) The General Plan FEIR (Section 5 11) indicates that the Rancho Cucamonga area is on an alluvial fan According to the San Bernardino County database, no paleontological sites or resources have been recorded within the City of Rancho Cucamonga or the sphere-of-influence, including the project site, however, the area has a high sensitivity rating for paleontological resources The older alluvium, which would have been deposited during the wetter climate that prevailed 10,000-100,000 years ago during the Late Pleistocene epoch of the Quaternary period, when the last "Ice Age" and the appearance of modern man occurred, may contain significant vertebrate fossils The protect site is underlain by Quaternary alluvium per General Plan Exhibit V-2, therefore, the following mitigation measures shall be implemented 2) If any paleontological resources (i a plant or animal fossils) are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified paleontologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i e , paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures • Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing activities • Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find • Prepare, identify, and curate all recovered fossils for documentation in the summary report and transfer to an appropriate depository (i e , San Bernardino County Museum) • Submit a summary report to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to the San Bernardino County Museum d) The proposed protect is in an area that has already been disturbed by development The project site has already been disrupted by construction of infrastructure and surrounding developments No known religious or sacred sites exist within the protect area No evidence is in place to suggest the protect site has been used for human burials The California Health and Safety Code (Section 7050 5) states that if human remains are discovered on-site, no further disturbance shall occur until the County Coroner has made a determination of origin and disposition pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 5097 98 As adherence to State regulations is required for all development, no mitigation is required in the unlikely event human remains are discovered on-site No adverse impacts are anticipated • • B&C-29 Initial Study for DRC2007-00560, DRC2007-00561 • • City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 9 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Su ortrn Information Sources hh g Potentially Significant With Mitigation Than Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact 6 GEOLOGY AND SOILS Would the pro/ect a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, intury, or death involving i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as () () (/) ( ) delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known faulty Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42 ii) Strong seismic ground shakings () () (/) ( ) m) Seismic-related ground failure, mc,ludmg O O O (/) liquefaction iv) Landslides O O O (/) b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoils () ( () (/) c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, () () () (/) or that would become unstable as a result of the protect, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table () () () (/) 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use () () () (/) of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater Comments a) No known faults pass through the site and it is not in an Earthquake Fault Zone, nor is it m the Rancho Cucamonga City Special Study Zone along the Red Hill Fault, according to the General Plan Exhibit V-1, and Section 5 1 of the General Plan FEIR The Red Hill Fault passes within approximately 0 66 mile south of the site, and the Cucamonga Fault Zone lies approximately 0 27 mile north These faults are both capable of producing MW 6 0-7 0 earthquakes Also, the San Jacinto Fault, capable of producing up to MW 7 5 earthquakes, is approximately 11 21 miles northeasterly of the site and the San Andreas Fault, capable of up to MW 8 2 earthquakes, is approximately 14 77 miles northeasterly of the site Each of these faults can produce strong groundshaking Adhering to the Uniform Building Code will ensure that geologic impacts are less-than-significant b) The proposed protect will not require the excavation, stockpiling, and/or movement of on-site soils An existing commercial plaza is located on the protect site The scope of this protect does not include the alteration of any existing uses or the addition of new uses on the protect site and no construction activities are proposed Therefore, the propose protect will not result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil B&C-30 Initial Study for DRC2007-00560, DRC2007-00561 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 10 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP g Potentially Significant Wiih Mitigation Than Signdicant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact c) The General Plan FEIR (Section 5 1) indicates that subsidence is generally associated with large decreases or withdrawals of water from the aquifer The project would not withdraw water from the existing aquifer The site is not within a geotechnical hazardous area or other unstable geologic unit or soil type according to General Plan FEIR Figure 51-2 Soil types on-site consist of Hanford-Greenfield Soil association according to General Plan FEIR Exhibit 5 1-3 No adverse impacts are anticipated d) The majority of Rancho Cucamonga, including the project site, is located on alluvial soil deposits These types of soils are not considered to be expansive Soil types on-site consist of Hanford-Greenfield Soil Associations according to General Plan Exhibit V-3 and General Plan FEIR Exhibit 5 1-3 These soils are sandy foams typically used for irrigated crops, homesites, and related uses No adverse impacts are anticipated e) The project is connected to and served by, the existing local sewer system for wastewater disposal No septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal is proposed 7 HAZARDS AND WASTE MATERIALS Would the pro/ect a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the () () () (/) environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the () () () (/) environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials mto the environment c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or () () () (/) acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within 1/4 mile of an existing or proposed schooi~ d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of t,) () () (/) hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962 5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, () () () (/) where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, () () () (/) would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an () () () (/) adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of () () () (/) loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands~ • • • B&C-31 • Initial Study for DRC2007-00560, DRC2007-00561 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 11 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources pp g Potentially Sigrnhcant With MrtigaUOn Than Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Comments a) The project will not involve the transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials The City participates in a countywide interagency coalition that is considered a full service Hazardous Materials Division that is more comprehensive that any other m the state The City is in the process of developing an Emergency Operations Plan to meet State and Federal requirements The City has approved a Local Hazard Mitigation Plan which has received State and Federal approvals Compliance with Federal, State, and local regulatlons concerning the storage and handling of hazardous materlals and/or waste will reduce the potential for significant impacts to a level less-than-significant No adverse impacts are expected b) The proposed project does not include the use of hazardous materials or volatile fuels The City participates in a countywide interagency coalition that is considered a full service Hazardous Materials Division that is more comprehensive than any other in the state The City is in the process of developing an Emergency Operations Plan to meet State and Federal requirements The City has approved a Local Hazard Mitigation Plan which has received State and Federal approvals Compliance with Federal, State, and local regulations concerning the storage and handling of hazardous materials or volatile fuels will reduce the potential for significant impacts to a level less-than-significant fJo adverse impacts are anticipated • c) There are schools located within 1/4 mile of the project site The project site is located within 0 22 mile of the nearest existing or proposed school The existing uses on the project site do not create objectionable odors No alteration of existing uses or addition of new uses is proposed for this project Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated d) The proposed project is not listed as a hazardous waste or substance materials site Recent site inspection did not reveal the presence of discarded drums or illegal dumping of hazardous materials No impact is anticipated e) The site is not located within an airport land use plan and is not within 2 miles of a public airport The project site is located approximately 5 9 rniles northerly of the Ontario Airport and is offset north of the flight path No impact is anticipated f) The nearest private airstrip, Cable Airport, is located approximately 2 1/2 miles to the west of the City's westerly limits No impact is anticipated g) The City's Multi-Hazard Disaster Plan, which is updated every two years, includes policies and procedures to be administered by the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District in the event of a disaster Because the project includes at least two points of public street access and is required to comply with all applicable City codes, including local fire ordinances, no adverse impacts are anticipated • h) Rancho Cucamonga faces the greatest ongoing threat from awind-driven fire in the Urban Wildland Interface area found in the northern part of the City according to the Fire District Strategic Plan 2000-2005, however, the proposed project site is not located within a high fire hazard area according to General Plan Exhibit V-7 B&C-32 Initial Study for DRC2007-00560, DRC2007-00561 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 12 Less Than 9gnificant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources pp g Poteni~ally Significant With Mitigation Than Signdicant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact 8 HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY Would the project a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge () () () (/) requirements? b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere () () () (/) substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e g ,the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted) c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the () () () (/) site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner, which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the () () () (/) site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner, which would result in flooding on- or off-site e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed () () () (/) the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality () () () (/) g) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as () () () (/) mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation maps h) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures () () () (/) that would impede or redirect flood flows i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of () () () (/) loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or damp ~) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow~ () () () (/) Comments a) Water and sewer service is provided by the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD) The protect is an existing commercial plaza with a medical and professional office building No new uses or alteration of existing uses is proposed for this protect The scope of the project does not include construction activities The existing uses on the protect site will not violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements b) According to CVWD, 43 percent of the City's water is currently provided from groundwater in the Cucamonga and Chino Basins CVWD has adopted a master plan that estimates demand needs until the year 2030 The proposed project will not deplete groundwater • • B&C-33 • Initial Study for DRC2007-00560, DRC2007-00561 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 13 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources pp g Potentially Signficant With Mrtiganon Than Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact supplies, nor will it interfere with recharge because it is not within an area designated as a recharge basin or spreading ground according to General Plan Exhibit IV-2 The project will not affect the existing aquifer, estimated to be about 288 to 470 feet below the ground surface As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 9), continued development citywide will increase water needs and is a significant impact, however, CVWD has plans to meet this increased need through the construction of future water facilities c) The project will not cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff The project does not include the construction of new buildings or the placement of additional hardscape on the project site The project will not alter the course of any stream or river All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows Therefore, the project will not result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site No impacts are anticipated ail The project will not cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns and +he rate and amount of surface water runoff The project does not include the construction of new buildings or the placement of additional hardscape on the project site The project will not alter the course of any stream or river All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows Therefore, increase in runoff from the site will not result in flooding on- or off-site No impacts are anticipated • e) The project will not cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff The project does not include the construction of new buildings or the placement of additional hardscape on the project site The project will not alter the course of any stream or river Ali runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows The project will not result in substantial additional sources of polluted runoff Therefore, increase in runoff from the site will not result in flooding on- or off-site No impacts are anticipated f) No grading activities are proposed for this project The project will not substantially degrade the water quality g) No housing units are proposed with this project No adverse impacts are expected h) The project site is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Map No 06071C8630F, dated June 21, 1996 No adverse impacts are expected The Rancho Cucamonga area is flood protected by an extensive storm drain system designed to convey a 100-year storm event The system is substantially improved and provides an integrated approach for regional and local drainage flows This existing system includes several debris dams and levees north of the City, spreading grounds, concrete-lined channels, and underground storm drains as shown in General Plan Exhibit V-6 The project site is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Exhibit V-5 No adverse impacts are expected • ~) There are no oceans, lakes, or reservoirs near the project site, therefore, impacts from seiche and tsunami are not anticipated The Rancho Cucamonga area sits at the base of the steep eastern San Gabriel Mountains whose deep canyons were cut by mountain streams Numerous man-made controls have been constructed to reduce the mudflow impacts to the level of non-significance within the City This existing system includes several debris dams and levees north of the City, and spreading grounds both within and north of the City B&C-34 Initial Study for DRC2007-00560, DRC2007-00561 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 14 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP g Potentially Signficant with Mitigation than Signdicant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact 9 LAND USE AND PLANNING Would the project a) Physically divide an established community () () () (/) b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or () () () (/) regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to, a general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan () () () (/) or natural community conservation plan? Comments a) The site is located on the west side of Carnelian Street, just south of Base Line Road, and is characterized by commercial development to the north and east, residential development to the south, and a public parking lot to the west An existing commercial plaza is located on the project site The scope of the project does not include the alteration of any existing uses or the addition of new uses on the project site The project is a part of the larger community No adverse impacts are anticipated b) The project site's current land use designation on the General Plan is Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) The project proposes to change the land use designation from Medium Residential to Neighborhood Commercial in order to be consistent with the existing commercial uses on the project site The project also proposes to change the zone from Medium Residential to Neighborhood Commercial to be consistent with the new General Plan Land Use Designation The project does not interfere with any policies for environmental protection As such, no impacts are anticipated c) The project site is not located within any habitat conservation or natural community plan area According to the General Plan Exhibit IV-3, and Section 5 3 of the General Plan FEIR, the project site is not within an area of sensitive biological resources, therefore, development will not adversely affect rare or endangered species of plants or animals because of the fact that the project is surrounded by urbanized land uses and is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Plan 10 MINERAL RESOURCES Would the project a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral () () () (/) resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the State b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally important () () () (/) mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan Comments a) The site is not designated as a State Aggregate Resources Area according to the City General Plan, Figure IV-1 and Table IV-1, therefore, there is no impact • • • B&C-35 • Initial Study for DRC2007-00560, DRC2007-00561 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 15 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources pp g Potentially Significant with Mitigation Than Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact b) The site is not designated by the General Plan, Figure IV-1 and Table IV-1, as a valuable mineral resource recovery site, therefore, there is no impact • 11 NOISE Would the project result m a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in () () () (/) excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive () () () (/) ground borne vibration or ground borne noise levels c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise () () () (/) levels in the project vicinity above levels existing ~vitilout the pro~ect~ d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in () () () (/) ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the pro~ect~ e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, () () () (/) where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, O O O (/) would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels Comments a) The project site is not within an area of noise levels exceeding City standards according to General Pian Exhibit V-13 at build-out No adverse impact is expected from this protect b) The uses associated with this type of project normally do not induce ground borne vibrations As such, no impacts are anticipated c) The primary source of ambient noise levels in Rancho Cucamonga is traffic Since the project site is an existing commercial plaza, the proposed protect will not increase traffic Therefore, the project is unlikely to increase the ambient noise levels within the vicinity of the project d) An existing commercial plaza is located on the project site The scope of the project does not include the alteration of any existing uses or the addition of new uses on the project site No construction activities are proposed for the project site Therefore, the project will not result in any substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project • e) The site is not located within an airport land use plan and is not within 2 miles of a public airport The site is located approximately 5 9 miles northerly of the Ontario Airport and is offset north of the flight path No impact is anticipated B&C-36 Initial Study for DRC2007-00560, DRC2007-00561 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 16 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources pp g Potentially Sgnificant With Mingahon Than Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact f) The nearest private airstrip, Cable Airport, is located approximately 2 1/2 miles to the west of the City's westerly limits No impact is anticipated 12 POPULATION AND HOUSING Would the pro/ect a) Induce substantial population growth m an area, either () () () (/) directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure) b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, () () () (/) necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating () () () (/) the construction of replacement housing elsewhere Comments a) The project site is an existing commercial plaza located ~n a predominantly developed area No construction activities will occur on the project site Approval of this project will not attract new ernployees to the area and will not create a demand for additional housing No impacts are anticipated b) The project site contains no existing housing units No adverse impact expected c} The project site is developed with an existing commercial plaza No new construction is proposed No impacts are anticipated 13 PUBLIC SERVICES Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physrcally altered governmental facilities, need for new or physrcally altered governmental facrlrtres, the construction of which could cause signrf~cant environmental rmpacts, rn order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services a) Fire protections () () () (/) b) Police protections O O O (/) c) Schools? () () () (/) d) Parks () () () (/) e) Other public facilities O O O (/) Comments a) The site, located on the west side of Carnelian Street, lust south of Base Line Road, would be served by a fire station located approximately 1 5 mile from the project site The project will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities Standard conditions of approval from the Uniform Building and Fire Codes will be placed on the project so no impacts to fire services will occur No impacts are anticipated • • • B&C-37 Initial Study for DRC2007-00560, DRC2007-00561 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 17 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Su ortln Information Sources pP g Potentially Signdicant With MiLgauon Than Signdicani No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact b) Additional police protection Is not required as the addition of the project will not change the pattern of uses within the surrounding area and will not have a substantial increase In property to be patrolled as the project site Is within an area that Is regularly patrolled c) The site Is In a developed area currently served by the Central School District and the Chaffey Joint Union High School Dlstrlct The project will be required to pay school fees as prescribed by State law prior to the issuance of building permits No impacts are anticipated d) The site Is In a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga The nearest park Is located approximately 0 14 mile from the project site The project will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline In the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities A standard condition of approval will require the developer to pay park development fees No impacts are anticipated • e) The proposed project will utilize existing public facilities The site Is In a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga The project will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline In the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct nPw facilities Cumulative development within Rancho Cucamonga will increase demand for library services According to the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 9 9), the protected increase In library space under the General Plan will not meet the protected demand The General Plan FEIR identified the cumulative impact on library services as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council The proposed protect Is consistent with the General Plan for which the EIR was prepared and impacts evaluated Since the adoption of the General Plan, the City built a new library within the Victoria Gardens regional shopping center of approximately 22,000 square feet, which Is In excess of the protected need of 15,500 square feet at build-out of the City 14 RECREATION Woiald the project a) Increase the use of existing neighborhood and () () () (/) regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated b) Does the protect include recreational facilities or () () () (/) require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities, which might have an adverse physical effect on the envlronment~ Comments • a) The site Is In a developed area, currently served by the Clty of Rancho Cucamonga The nearest park Is located approximately 0 14 mile from the protect site This protect Is not proposing any new housing or large employment generator that would cause an increase In the use of parks or other recreational facilities A standard condition of approval will require the developer to pay park development fees No Impacts are anticipated b) See a) response above B&C-38 Initial Study for DRC2007-00560, DRC2007-00561 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 18 Less Than Signdicant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially Significant with Mitigation Than Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact 15 TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC Would the project a) Cause an increase in traffic, which is substantial in () () () (/) relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (i e , result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections) b) Exceed, Dither individually or cumulatively, a IPVei of () () () (/) service standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including () () () (/) either an increase in +Yaffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature {) () () (/) (e g , sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e g ,farm equfpment)~ e} Result in inadequate emergency access () () () (/) f) Result in inadequate parking capacity O O O (/) g) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs () () () (/) supporting alternative transportation (e g , bus turnouts, bicycle racks) Comments a) The protect site is an existing commercial plaza with a medical and professional building The scope of the protect does not include additional uses or alteration of existing uses on the protect site The protect is in an area that is mostly developed with existing street improvements Therefore, approval of the protect will not create a substantial increase in the number of vehicle trips, traffic volume, or congestion at intersections No impacts are anticipated b) The protect is in an area that is mostly developed with all street improvements existing An existing commercial plaza, with a medical and professional building, is located on the protect site The scope of the protect does not include additional uses or alteration of existing uses that would increase the traffic volume in the area Therefore, the protect will not negatively impact the level of service standards on adjacent arterials No impacts are anticipated c) Located approximately 5 9 miles northerly of the Ontario Airport, the site is offset north of the flight path and will not change air traffic patterns No impacts are anticipated d) No construction activities are proposed for this project The protect design does not include any sharp curves or dangerous intersections or farming uses The protect will not be required to construct any street improvements Therefore, the protect will not create a substantial increase in hazards because of a design feature No impacts are anticipated e) The protect will be designed to provide access for all emergency vehicles and will, therefore, not create an inadequate emergency access No impacts are anticipated • • • B&C-39 • Initial Study for DRC2007-00560, DRC2007-00561 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 19 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially Significant wnh Mitigation Than Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact f) The protect design has adequate parking in compliance with standards of the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code and will, therefore, not create an inadequate parking capacity No impacts are anticipated g) The protect design includes, or the project will be conditioned to provide, features supporting transportation and vehicle trip reduction (e g ,bus bays, bicycle racks, carpool parking, etc ) 16 UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS Would the project a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the () () () (/) applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board b) Require or result in the construction of new water or () () () (/) wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects c) Require or result in the construction of new storm () () () (/) water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the () () () (/) protect from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment () () () (/) provider, which serves or may serve the project, that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's protected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted () () () (/) capacity to accommodate the protect's solid waste disposal needs g) Comply with Federal, State, and local statutes and () () () (/) regulations related to solid waste Comments a} The proposed protect is served by the Cucamonga Vailey Water District (CVWD) sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga The protect is required to meet the requirements of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board regarding wastewater No impacts are anticipated • b) The proposed protect is served by the CVWD sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga and RP-1 located within City of Ontario, neither of which are at capacity The protect is required to meet the requirements of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board regarding wastewater No impacts are anticipated B&C-40 Initial Study for DRC2007-00560, DRC2007-00561 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 20 Less Than Signdicant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources pp g Potentially Sigrnficant with Mitigation Than S~gndicani No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact c) Ail runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows A grading and drainage plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits The impact is not considered signrficant d) The project is served by the CVWD water system There is currently a sufficient water supply available to the City of Rancho Cucamonga to serve this project No impacts are anticipated e) The proposed project is served by the CVWD sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga and RP-1 located within City of Ontario, neither of which are at capacity No impacts are anticipated f) Solid waste disposal will be provided by the current City contracted hauler who disposes the refuse at a permitted landfill with sufficient capacity to handle the City's solid waste disposal needs g) This project complies with Federal, State, and local statutes and regulations regarding solid waste The City of Rancho Cucamonga continues to implement waste reduction procedures consistent with AB 939 Therefore, no impacts are anticipated 17 MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the () () () (/) quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory b) Does the project have impacts that are individually () () () (/) limited, but cumulatively considerable ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the eftects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future pro~ects)~ c) Does the project have environmental effects that will () () () (/) cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly Comments a) The site is not located in an area of sensitive biological resources as identified on the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Exhibit IV-3 Additionally, the area surrounding the site is developed Based on previous development and street improvements, it is unlikely that any endangered or rare species would inhabit the site J • B&C-41 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2007-00560, DRC2007-00561 Page 21 • b) If the proposed protect were approved, then the applicant would be required to develop the site in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan The 2001 General Plan was adopted along with the certification of a Program FEIR, Findings of Fact, and a Statement of Overriding Considerations for significant adverse environmental effects of build-out in the City and Sphere-of-Influence The City made findings that adoption of the General Plan would result in significant adverse effects to aggregate resources, prime farmland, air quality, the acoustical environment, library services, and aesthetics and visual resources Mitigation measures were adopted for each of these resources, however, they would not reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels As such, the City adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations balancing the benefits of development under the General Pian Update against the significant unavoidable adverse impacts (CEQA Guidelines Section 15092 and 15096(h)) These benefits include less overall traffic volumes by developing mixed-use projects that will be pedestrian friendly and conservation of valuable natural open space With these findings and the Statement of Overriding Considerations, no further discussion or evaluation of cumulative impacts is required c) Development of the site under the proposed land use change would not cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly The Initial Study identifies construction-related emissions of criteria pollutants as having a potentially significant impact Proposed mitigation measures would further reduce emission levels Additionally, impacts resulting from air quality would be short-term and would cease once construction activities were completed The Initial Study identified potentially significant impacts associated with the exposure of people to increased noise levels Mitigation measures contained in this Initial Study will ensure impacts are at less-than-significant levels • EARLIER ANALYSES Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or Negative Declaration per Section 15063(c)(3)(D) The effects identified above for this project were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in the following earlier document(s) pursuant to applicable legal standards, and such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis The following earlier analyses were utilized in completing this Initial Study and are available for review in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Department offices, 10500 Civic Center Drive (check all that apply) (/) General Plan FEIR (SCH#200006107, Certified October 17, 2001) (/) Master Environmental Assessment for the 1989 General Plan Update (SCH #88020115, certified January 4, 1989) • B&C-42 Initial Study for DRC2007-00560, DRC2007-00561 APPLICANT CERTIFICATION City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 22 I certify that I am the applicant for the project described in this Initial Study I acknowledge that I have read this Initial Study and the proposed mitigation measures Further, I have revised the project plans or proposals and/or hereby agree to the proposed mitigation measures to avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant environmental effects would occur A licant's Si natur ` ~~ C ~ L2~=GG.~`~~~'~ Date /~ ~~ --U ~r ~ Print Name and Title • • B&C-43 ~- f' V~ ~- ~. City of Rancho Cucamonga '~-~-' =' ' MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION The following M~t~gated Negative Declaration is being circulated for public review -n accordance with the Cal~forn~a Environmental Qualrty Act Section 21091 and 21092 of the Public Resources Code :~ • Project File No GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2007-00560 AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT DRC2007-00561 Public Review Period Closes December 12, 2007 Protect Name Project Applicant Martha Boardman Protect Location (also see attached map) Located on the west side of Carnelian Street, lust south of Base Line Road - APN 0207-022-07 Protect Description A request to change the General Plan designation and zone from Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) to Neighborhood Commercial for an existing commercial development FINDING This is to advise that the City of Rancho Cucamonga, acting as the lead agency, has conducted an Initial Study to determine if the protect may have a significant effect on the environment and is proposing this Mitigated Negative Declaration based upon the following finding The Initial Study identified potentially significant effects but (1) Revisions in the protect plans or proposals made or agreed to by the applicant before this proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration was released for public review would avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant effects would occur, and (2) There is no substantial evidence before the agency that the protect, as revised, may have a significant effect on the environment If adopted, the Mitigated Negative Declaration means that an Environmental Impact Report will not be required The factual and analytical basis for this finding is included in the attached fnitial Study The project file and all related documents are available for review at the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department at 10500 Civic Center Drive (909) 477-2750 or Fax (909) 477-2847 NOTICE The public is invited to comment on the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration during the review period December 12, 2007 Date of Determination Adopted By B&C-44 RESOLUTION NO 07-70 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2007-00560 TO CHANGE THE ZONE DESIGNATION FROM MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL TO NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL FOR 0 40 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED AT 7388 CARNELIAN STREET, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN 0207-022-07 A Recitals 1 Martha Boardman filed an application for General Plan Amendment No DRC2007-00560 as described in the title of this Resolution Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject General Plan Amendment is referred to as "the application " 2 On December 12, 2007, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date 3 Ail legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred B Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning • Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows 1 This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing on December 12, 2007, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows a The application applies to approximately 0 40 acres of land, basically a rectangular configuration, located at 7388 Carnelian street and is presently developed with a medical and professional office building Said property is currently designated as Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre), and b The property to the north of the subject site is designated Neighborhood Commercial The property to the west is designated Neighborhood Commercial The property to the east is designated Office Professional The property to the south is designated Medium Residential c This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development within the district in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development, and d This amendment does promote the goals and objectives of the Land Use Element, and e This amendment would not be materially in~unous or detrimental to the adtacent properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding B&C-45 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 07-70 GPA DRC2007-00560 -MARTHA BOARDMAN December 12, 2007 Page 2 properties Additionally, the site is developed with an existing commercial office building consistent with surrounding land uses in the vicinity 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows a That the subject property is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district in terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land use in the surrounding area, and is developed with an existing commercial office building, and b That the proposed amendment would not have significant impacts on the environment nor the surrounding properties, and no new construction is proposed as part of the land use amendment, and c That the proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan Environmental Miticlation Cu/fural Resources 1) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or • during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will • Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value • Consider establishing provisions to require incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point • Pursue educating the public about the archaeological heritage of the area • Propose mitigation measures and recommend conditions of approval to eliminate adverse project effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, following appropriate CEQA guidelines • Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the project area Submit one copy of the completed report with original illustrations, to the San • Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving B&C-46 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 07-70 GPA DRC2007-00560 -MARTHA BOARDMAN December 12, 2007 • Page 3 2) If any paleontological resources (i a plant or animal fossils) are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified paleontologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i e , paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures • Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval ofearth-disturbing activities • Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find • Prepare, identify, and curate ail recovered fossils for documentation in the summary report and transfer to an appropriate depository (i a ,San Bernardino County Museum) • Submit a summary report to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to the San Bernardino County Museum 4 Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows a Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project Based on the findings contained m that Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared Thereafter, the City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration b The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it, finds (i) that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA, and (ii) that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment The Planning Commission further finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission Based on these findings, the Planning Commission hereby adopts the Mitigated Negative Declaration B&C-47 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 07-70 GPA DRC2007-00560 -MARTHA BOARDMAN December 12, 2007 Page 4 c The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081 6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation The Planning Commission therefore adopts the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project d The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring Program and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the Planning Commission's decision is based is the City Planner of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 477-2750 5 Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby recommends approval of General Plan Amendment No DRC2007-00560 6 The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 12TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2007 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY Pam Stewart, Chairman ATTEST James R Troyer, AICP, Secretary I, James R Troyer, AICP, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 12th day of December 2007, by the following vote-to-wit AYES COMMISSIONERS NOES COMMISSIONERS ABSENT COMMISSIONERS • • • B&C-48 ~o° =~-~ -=-- _ =~ T~- ~ _ City of Rancho Cucamonga MITIGATION MONITORING 1~~ ~ ~ ~.~~~~~~~~..' PROGRAM -~---~ Project File No This Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP) has been prepared for use in implementing the mitigation measures identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the above-listed project This program has been prepared in compliance with State law to ensure that adopted mitigation measures are implemented (Section 21081 6 of the Public Resources Code) Program Components -This MMP contains the following elements 1 Conditions of approval that act as impact mitigation measures are recorded with the action and the procedure necessary to ensure compliance The mitigation measure conditions of approval are contained in the adopted Resolution of Approval for the project 2 A procedure of compliance and verification has been outlined for each action necessary This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported • 3 The MMP has been designed to provide focused, yet flexible guidelines As monitoring progresses, changes to compliance procedures may be necessary based upon recommendations by those responsible for the program Program Management -The MMP will be in place through all phases of the project The project planner, assigned by the Planning Director, shall coordinate enforcement of the MMP The project planner oversees the MMP and reviews the Reporting Forms to ensure they are filled out correctly and proper action is taken on each mitigation Each City department shall ensure compliance of the conditions (mitigation) that relate to that department Procedures -The following steps will be followed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga 1 A fee covering all costs and expenses, including any consultants' fees, incurred by the City in performing monitoring or reporting programs shall be charged to the applicant 2 A MMP Reporting Form will be prepared for each potentially significant impact and its corresponding mitigation measure identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Checklist, attached hereto This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported All monitoring and reporting documentation will be kept in the project file with the department having the original authority for processing the project Reports will be available from the City upon request at the following address City of Rancho Cucamonga -Lead Agency Planning Department • 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 B&C-49 MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM DRC2007-00560 AND DRC2007-00561 -MARTHA BOARDMAN December 12, 2007 • Page 2 3 Appropriate specialists will be retained if technical expertise beyond the City staff's is needed, as determined by the project planner or responsible City department, to monitor specific mitigation activities and provide appropriate written approvals to the project planner 4 The project planner or responsible City department will approve, by signature and date, the completion of each action item that was identified on the MMP Reporting Form After each measure is verified for compliance, no further action is required for the specific phase of development 5 All MMP Reporting Forms for an impact issue requiring no further monitoring will be signed off as completed by the project planner or responsible City department at the bottom of the MMP Reporting Form 6 Unanticipated circumstances may arise requiring the refinement or addition of mitigation measures The project planner is responsible for approving any such refinements or additions An MMP Reporting Form will be completed by the project planner or responsible City department and a copy provided to the appropriate design, construction, or operational personnel 7 The project planner or responsible City department has the authority to stop the work of construction contractors if compliance with any aspects of the MMP is not occurring after written notification has been issued The project planner or responsible City department also has the authority to hold certificates of occupancies if compliance with a mitigation measure attached hereto is not occurring The project planner or responsible City department has the authority to • hold issuance of a business license until all mitigation measures are implemented 8 Any conditions (mitigation) that require monitoring after project completion shall be the responsibility of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department The Department shall require the applicant to post any necessary funds (or other forms of guarantee) with the City These funds shall be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measure for the required period of time 9 In those instances requiring long-term project monitoring, the applicant shall provide the City with a plan for monitoring the mitigation activities at the project site and reporting the monitoring results to the City Said plan shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented The monitoring/reporting plan shall conform to the City's MMP and shall be approved by the Community Development Director or Planning Director prior to the issuance of building permits • B&C-50 • .-. H Q a J Q H Z .;.i F- J •Y W 2 U Q O m a W m = Z cv U Q ~ Q. ~C a o r Z t.f) ~ O ~ ri ~-- o Z U O 0 Z ~ ~ Z F- Q a ° ~ `° o • 0 z a~ ++ V Q~ 0 L a .. W a L Q. s.. a ~a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ c~ c~ c~ c~ c~ ° a a a s a 0 ~. 0 Q 0 ~ 0 Q 0 Q m a~ m a~ ~ 0 0 0 0 0 3 ~ ~ ~ ~ m o a~ a~ m > O > O > N > N > N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ U U U U U • O O O O m m m m 0 0 0 0 0 ~ ~ ~ a ~ ~ = C Cll CTS -O C ~ Q) ~ cis (ll ~ fll Q ~ ' ~ L ~ ,--~ ~ Q) i ~ O __ C C.1 N ~ O ~ m ~ E ~ T3 U ~ ~ N ~ ~ r m o o m ~ i °'µ=~ ~ ~ ~' ~ ~ E a~ ~ ~oU ~ ` n ~ > O ~ ~ ~ ~ c~ ~ ° ~ ~ " ~ o m o its ~ c m ~-o 4s ~ ~ ~ c Q ~ o~~o~s= in cEa~ O ~ c~ ~ ~ ~~~Q E~c-a~~ ~ `~~ o ~ ~ -o o Q ~ ~ c~ o ~~~Q ~~ ~~~ o ~ ~~ ~~ ~~, ~°'~~~~ ~~~ ~~~ ~~ ~~~~, ~ mom= ~~ 0 0 .- O f? ~ N > O U Q a O o N i1 _C ~ c m Cn i L O CTS U _O ~ E~~ ... ~ O ~ V7 0 0~ ~ O. O ~ s O O E 3 ~ O O V O p~ Cn ~ s= +- O ~ ~ ~ ~ > ctf ~ ~ O ~ ~ ~ N ~ ' .~ L O ~ O O O 0 (ll 0 p j ~ O ~ U -p N O -~ O ~ ~ C (ll CTS *- L U ~ lll cv _ ~ co c~ vi ~ ~ O Q ~ ~ ~ Q O ~ 'J ~ ~= O O O~ Cn ~ ~ C ~ i N CO O ~ U ~ c~ N p 00 ~ ~ U 0 O O~ O.. y U ~ ~ ~ ~ Ct3 ~ ~ O ~ ~_ O O ~ O ~ U ~ O SZ ~ ~ ~ Cy 0 "~ U cts - 0 0 't7 Y~~ - ~~ p U ~ C~ U -O U iT cis N .~ T~ O O ff" ` U ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .--~ ~ ~ ~ _O ~ O ~ ~ ~ Q ~ ~ ~ ~ m-o ~ o~ cn CTS c o o CTS ~ ~ ~ sZO o i ~ m o C ~ a~ a~ m ~ = o zT ~ ~ C j ~ O co O C > ~ ~ C _~ ~ W Cn ~ cTS O U~ N U ~ ~ ~ O i ~ cts ~ ~~ (ll ~ d U (ll Q C~ ~ ~ O N _~ ~ ~ ~ Q Cis O Q co . ~ U ~ ~ U ~ a~i °~ ~ :Z cts N 0 T B&C-51 d' V ~ M C7 ' a a a o 0 'L ~' ~ ~ i Q Q Q Q d N ~ N ~ N U O O O O N N N ~ ~ ~ ' ~ Q~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ U m m m ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ C0 ~ d COL ~O ~ ~ "06 O .~ ~ L ~-. ~ .~ ~ "~'' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ L ~ C c ~ p > ~ T .«- c0 c0 to O -d ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O_ ~ ~ O O ~ ~ N U U N ~ ~ L ~ C ~ U ~ _ p~ O~ O E~ Q O cn CO 0 0~ C N O~~ ~ }, m N O O O ~ _o ~ {? C O ~ ~ ~ ~ L ~ (ll - m O ~ ~ O ~ a ~ ~ ~ O (ll 0 ~ c0 O O ~ m U a c ~ ~ ~ ~ .-- > ~ ~ ~ ~ m L ~ C p ~ ~ ~ O c0 O c ~ ~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ CO c ~ O c0 ~' ~ ~ U t0 ~ ~ Q- ~ 'O ~ ~~ c0 ~+ "a ~ t0 ~ ~ O CO ~~ p - p c~ O 7 ~ OY ~-O U p Q~ U ~~ ~ O_ p ~ N fll~ ~ ~ ~ ~.-. O O p UL ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ L 0 ~ ~ 'a ~ ~ ~ >, U ~ ~ _ ~ ~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ '~ O_ O ~ _7 O «- ~ C O ~ O O 7 ~ ~ O ~ + 0 ~ fll Q (ll U _~~ _ N ~ o c0 ~ ~ '~'~ ~ O ~ c p ~ ~ c0 0 0 _O ~ Cv ~ ~ O U ~~ c ~ i 0 'C ~ ~ O O ~ ~ > ? a> N ~ N to N c0 ~ cn ~ ~ ~ ~ c ~ c O its ~ ~ ~ ~ ~s~'~oE -~E~ ~ C~ooUVO ~~~~ ~~L ~ a°> ~ ~ ° ~ °' ro Q~a'r `~L ~ ~ m a~ Q~ ~ o o a~ O -E m E c0 ~ ~ U O ~ ~ ~ c0 ~ c t~ iZ ~ ~ ~ _ L -c- O ~ ~ c in iz 7 c0 ~ O ~ t0 ~ ~ a Q ~ ... ~ v O c c ~ a~ w a~i ~ ~ ~ o a~ Cn ~ c ¢ m E~ O O O m U~ c ~ `o m~ m° m y ~ ~a ~U , ~ U n. ~ cnU °~ ~~~ O~ L Q O Q O O o ~ -aU~~n~nEc0~° it c0 ~ U ~ ~ C ~ ~. _ tL ~ O O O O C O m O ~ p O o m ~ ~ U ~ O ~ c° a~i O o o- CC C7 U ~c p- a~ ~ U N a 'o -a o ~ ^ O ~:a L L_ L .C t L_ C1 ~ (6 o ~ 0 N C ~ ~ ~ O ~ ~ oC U N N o~ v ~ cD r c ro 0 a Y o a O = Q Q ~ ~ + \ ~ rt V c ~ o U ~ L ~ C Y (~ W. ~ C (U m ~ d 'a o Q U m ~ m c m L ~ ~ ~ aai O O a cn ~ ~ Q [U U D C N a ~ V p C O C d (U ~ C O U ` LT ~ ~ c d i O C LL Z ~ U ~ a C1 ~ o U ~ o > a m L O W ~ F- ~ p o U ~ _ '" ~ o ~ I- c O p a O ~ ~ Q m U ~ W Cu a> c m Cu 0 D o m ~ o c m a~ c aoi ~ C ~ _~ O ~ ~ O ~ U CU ~ N O ~ O O ~ O "p _m L ~ N ~ O U U _ ~ O C t/) -p a ~ °' ~ " ro d ~ 0 c 0 p_ o N E c w -~-p ~ U Q, ~ ~ U o0 d ~ d o p w 0 0 0 ~ U ~ U CD tL w N C O _R a N U d t U O Y • N O• N B&C-52 • RESOLUTION NO 07-71 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT DRC2007-00561 REQUESTING TO AMEND THE DEVELOPMENT DISTRICTS MAP FROM MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL TO NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL FOR 0 40 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED AT 7388 CARNELIAN STREET, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN 0207-022-07 A Recitals 1 Martha Boardman filed an application for Development District Amendment No DRC2007-00561, as described in the title of this Resolution Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development District Amendment is referred to as "the application " 2 On December 12, 2007, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application DRC2007-00561 and issued Resolution No 07-70, recommending to the City Council that the associated General Plan Amendment No DRC2007-00560 be approved 3 All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred • B Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows 1 This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing on December 12, 2007, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows a The application applies to approximately 0 40 acres of land, basically a rectangular configuration, located at 7388 Carnelian Street and is presently developed with a medical and professional office building Said property is currently designated as Medium Density residential, and b The property to the north of the subject site is designated Neighborhood Commercial The property to the west is designated Neighborhood Commercial The property to the east is designated Office Professional The property to the south is designated Medium Residential, and c This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development, within the district, in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development, and d This amendment does promote the goals and objectives of the Land Use Element, and B&C-53 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 07-71 DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT DRC2007-00561 -MARTHA BOARDMAN December 12, 2007 Page 2 • e This amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties Additionally, the site is developed with an existing commercal office building consistent with surrounding land uses in the vicinity 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows a That the subject property is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district in terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land use in the surrounding area, and is developed with an existing commercial office building, and b That the proposed amendment would not have significant impacts on the environment nor the surrounding properties, and no new construction is proposed as part of the land use amendment, and c That the proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan 4 Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the • findings as follows a Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared Thereafter, the City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration b The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it, finds (i) that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA, and (ii) that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment The Planning Commission furtherfinds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission Based on these findings, the Planning Commission hereby adopts the Mitigated Negative Declaration c The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081 6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation The Planning Commission therefore adopts the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project d The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring Program and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings B&C-54 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 07-71 DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT DRC2007-00561 -MARTHA BOARDMAN December 12, 2007 Page 3 upon which the Planning Commission's decision is based is the City Planner of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 477-2750 5 Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby recommends approval of Development District Amendment No DRC2007 00561 6 The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 12TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2007 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY Pam Stewart, Chairman • ATTEST James R Troyer, AICP, Secretary I, James R Troyer, AICP, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 12th day of December 2007, by the following vote-to-wit AYES COMMISSIONERS NOES COMMISSIONERS ABSENT COMMISSIONERS • B&C-55 DATE December 12, 2007 TO Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM James R Troyer, AICP, Planning Director BY Donald Granger, Associate Planner SUBJECT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18032 - PENINSULA RETAIL PARTNERS, LLC - A residential subdivision of 23 single- family lots on 7 74 acres of land m the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre) of the Etiwanda North Specific Plan, located on the west side of Day Creek Boulevard, south of Vintage Drive -APN 225-161-65 and 71 Related Files Tree Removal Permit DRC2006-00871 and Variance DRC2007-00097 Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for • consideration ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND VARIANCE DRC2007-00097- PENINSULA RETAIL PARTNERS, LLC - A request to allow up to 10 5 foot perimeter wall heights for sound attenuation purposes for lots 1-6 and to allow up to 7 5 foot combination retaining/freestanding sideyard wall heights for grade differential purposes for lots 1-6 of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18032, where a maximum 6-foot wall height is permitted, for a residential subdivision of 23 single family lots on 7 74 acres of land in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre) of the Etiwanda North Specific Pian, located on the west side of Day Creek Boulevard, south of Vintage Drive -APN 225-161-65 and 71 Related Files Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18032 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2006- 0087 Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration BACKGROUND On Wednesday, December 5, 2007, Planning staff received written correspondence from Charles Blankson, PhD , of the SCAQMD noting that the air quality modeling cited in the Initial Study for Tentative Tract SUBTT18032 is no longer used by the SCAQMD Mr Blankson stated that SCAQMD staff would need the URBEMIS 2007 model run for the above proposed protect to confirm the lead agency's conclusion that protect emissions would not violate any air quality standard or worsen existing air quality RECOMMENDATION In order to properly assess air quality impacts to the proposed protect, Planning staff has instructed the applicant to prepare an air quality study that meets SCAQMD's methodology Once the study is completed, the Initial Study will be re-circulated to all agencies, ITEM D & E PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTT18032 AND DRC2007-00097 -PENINSULA RETAIL PARTNERS, LLC December 12, 2007 • Page 2 including the SCAQMD Planning staff recommends that Tentative Tract SUBTT18032 and Variance DRC2007-00097 be continued to a date unspecific m order to allow adequate time for the applicant to prepare an air quality study and for the Initial Study to be re-circulated Respectfully submitted, ~~ James R Troyer, AICP Planning Director JT DG/Is • D&E-1 T H E C I T Y O F R A N C II O C U C A M O N G A Staff Report DATE December 12, 2007 TO Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM James R Troyer, AICP, Planning Director BY Mike Smith, Associate Planner SUBJECT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2006-00580 -MARK SATER - A request to construct a commercial center consisting of an auto service court (2,900 square foot gas station with convenience store and carwash) and a fast food restaurant of 1,800 square feet on 2 07 acres of land m the General Industnal (GI) District (Subarea 8), located at the southeast corner of Arrow Route and Etiwanda Avenue - APNs 0229-141-10 and -11 Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for • consideration PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION A Surrounding Land Use and Zoning North - Multi-family Apartments -Medium (M) Residential District, Etiwanda Specific Plan, South Overlay South - Vehicle/equipment storage yard and office -General Industrial (GI) District, Subarea 8 East - Vacant -General industrial (GI) District, Subarea 8 West - Ameron, Inc (concrete pipe manufacturing/storage) -Heavy Industrial (HI) District, Subarea 15 B General Plan Designations Project Site -General Industnal North - Medium Residential South - General Industrial East - Generallndustrial West - Heavy Industrial C Site Characteristics The proposed commercial center is a 2 07-acre site at the southeast corner of Arrow Route and Etiwanda Avenue The square shaped project site is made up of two parcels and is partially developed The south parcel is developed with a single-story building of about 11,000 square feet while the north parcel is vacant Surrounding the site is undeveloped land to the east, the Victoria Woods apartments to the north, a storage yard for Ameron, Inc (a concrete pipe manufacturer) to the west, and an industrial use with outdoor storage to the south The subject property is zoned General Industnal (Subarea 8), and is generally level with a gradual fall in grade elevation of ITEM F PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2006-00580 -MARK SATER December 12, 2007 • Page 2 approximately 8 feet from north to south With the exception of low grasses, there is no other vegetation or trees on the site D Parking Calculations T e of Use S uare Foota a Parkin Ratio S aces Re uired (Building A) Auto Service Station Carwash 3,886 n/a n/a n/a 3 (regardless of building size) 16 (regardless of building size) (Building B) Fast Food Restaurant 1,800 1/75 24 Tota I Required/ Provided 43/43 spaces ANALYSIS A General The applicant proposes a commercial complex consisting of an ARCO AM-PM auto service court comprised of a convenience store of about 2,900 square feet, gas canopy and pumps, and an automated self-service carwash of 986 square feet Additionally, there will be a fast food restaurant with adrive-thru of about 1,800 square feet The existing structure will be removed The gas station/convenience store will be • situated at the northwest corner of the site, while the restaurant will be located at the southeast corner of the site The canopy over the nine gas pumps will be located immediately east of the convenience store at the north side of the site The gas station, and convenience store, as is typical for these types of uses, will operate 24 hours a day The carwash will operate between 7 00 a m and 8 00 p m The restaurant tenant is undetermined at this time, therefore, no information regarding its operation is available Staff anticipates that it will be like any other fast food restaurant that is open between 8 00 a m to about 10 00 p m (perhaps later on weekends) A condition of approval has been included in the resolution specifying the hours of operation There will be two points of access -one via Etiwanda Avenue and another via Arrow Route Landscape coverage is 15 percent, the minimum requirement is 12 percent for this development district B Grading and Technical Review Committees The Grading Review Committee (Addington and James) reviewed the application on September 18, 2007 The Committee accepted the application following clarification of several minor issues Based upon that clarification, the committee recommended approval C Design Review Committee The Committee (Stewart, Munoz, and Nicholson) reviewed the project on September 18, 2007 At that time, the Committee did not accept the application as submitted since certain architectural elements and features of the project were deemed unsatisfactory for such an important location In general, the variety and application of architectural finishes/materials was too minimal, and minor corrections on the site layout were needed (Exhibit I) The applicant significantly revised the project according to their requests and afollow-up meeting with staff (Exhibit J) This revised submittal was reviewed again by the Committee on October 16, 2007, the Committee accepted the revisions and recommended approval subject to conditions Their conditions F-1 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2006-00580 -MARK SATER December 12, 2007 • Page 3 have been incorporated into the Resolution of Approval In addition, a uniform sign program was also submitted and conceptually approved with conditions D Environmental Assessment Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures related to biological resources, hydrology and water quality, noise, and air quality, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared Thereafter, the City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration A Mitigation Monitoring Program has also been prepared to ensure implementation of, and compliance with, the mitigation measures for the project RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of Conditional Use Permit DRC2006-00580 through the adoption of the attached Resolutions of Approval with conditions Respectfully submitted, R~ Ja s R Troyer, AICP Planning Director JRT MS/ge Attachments Exhibit A - Location Map Exhibit B - Aenai Map Exhibit C - Site Plan Exhibit D - Grading Plan with Sections Exhibit E - Convenience Store Elevations, Floor Plan, and Building Section Exhibit F - Gas Station Canopy Elevations and Roof Plan Exhibit G - Fast Food Restaurant Elevations Exhibit H - Conceptual Sign Program Exhibit I - Design Review Committee Action Comments, September 18, 2007 Exhibit J - Design Review Committee Action Comments, October 16, 2007 Exhibit K - Initial Study I, il, and III Draft Resolution of Approval for Conditional Use Permit DRC2006-00580 • F-2 ~e""'`eE 6R~,~cC. sit ~ ~~~~q~'t ~I _ ~„ ~~ ` 3 ' 1 ~n`~+~~~ ~ °o°wv. ~ -Gate m I AY SWIYdt i1L <I ~I~ ~ ~ AV ours ~ - oLD 'a %31I _ 'I' { p~ ~~ xs ~g N s ~"'gp 4 1 d5 tl357VH _~Ilv'f` ,vir +uNV 1113 , j~~y',,''~y~~I W so wm ° ul °~~" t0 '-- ~ - - -' - _ '_' ' -' A ~ - ONBIH__ = ~-- v ~,~~ 1~ 7~ z ~ 0 39a3YYV00 ~ NW:~r N qli ~I e,wvr ~ x 6>.~. r ~£„ PI , .u M~ f pp ~ 7~ m \ ~b W N ~ I ~ ~I ~ ~ ~---- z ~ m ~ I ~ v J G g is >31 4 ~ S y~ \ ~ a g I I A ~ N3SIVA w m k ~ ~I{I ',gm o \ ~ Atl I _ Nt~3d ® ~w t y ~d T3'Id 3NQ1NN xnYryml ~. 1~YAµ, y~ ~ =r ~ ~ \ ~ i I p~/~J _ NOIlYlaOdSNYtl1 t z Qi1 J Q i ~ ~ y ~ P.1°v ~~~G ~ . 1`3rY° ~1 1 ~ , , ~ , 0 0[6 ~ tlONtlMIl3 u9ooc tl ~ 1 ~ N 3 Dote Av ~mdxw ~ -~ DDee I U MTl3 oD ~I ntl VONVMII3 ntl ~ ~ yONV ,,* ,:orv,.'.~,r,IIN~u'u~.~'t',IMm'^~~ y1,N ~ e A S + ~ '"" ~< IL -' z z ~u > V "-~_ D3MTI5 w f"- ~ ~ !xl ' ~ "' ao 13 o LL ~ Ay s NOl I tHaYO [ AY N % AV 303 G N3N , 3 ~ ' - ~ ~ ~ 5 t, !{1 ~ ~ ~ werdn L v ~ ~ _ E 1 O N OOL nY 39tl ~ IA I- ~ ~~ p °d 47 R AY = - ~ ,~ '(J ~~. ~b S 0059 ~ ~ '8 Atl 30tliNIA i- w 3 ~ ~ a{`II nv~ `O,StlO 5 ~ A' ~'`~ b0 Aa113B3N0[` (.JSNBJ 'I ~ o ~ LL ~ I G a I ante ~tl4 ~33b~ OA18 \ y~~~ \ rim. W _ ~ A~ ;,`"h'4~~xi ~ ` ~~~ /~" V7Ntl' w.tN.~USu'lt. dt "w~ 7mT AI i. CL47aL~ "~"~`~VINtl5r""u~~'~IZ g AY 3llIA3NIM ~ 1 w ~ N v,`~y 8 J wm / / ~F, 1 < 3llI NIM A S Y O ~ ,~ Z Q ~ ~ ~ k ~ dOSSAH I INNtlN'I Y77'J7 AVO ~~ 4 ~ d8 to eb,Jl!I ,,, ~2,nf ~'b'IY1 G -,-.~ -^• - 44~' li,l t 7 , NNVN7 Y33S'J AVO ~ ! 9+ hLUV s ~ aD 55 ~~1I'~iI' Ss ~ 1 ~ W oy~l ~I $Il3NN3i ~~ 5 ~ ~ 1 a0 ~ dOSSAH d ~Mb~ ~ ~ a .- ° 1 OI2i`d1N0 s ~~ 0~3d(iNV9N3, _ ~ J s#anT,f, e A 1! nF'7rv.'n9NYa0 )'G a ~ +OU i9` lu'i+..e~ wl~y+i~~"'H+Ytt}Sllf i'~7S8LL' _ f OOIfi ! 0066 ~'1 No FOLHESTER - RD ~..'_'_"- ~ .. i3x~ B R s tatlnDwrO -~~ DO6[ `y .x~8~~~ j~ru,b,x oD ~I ~ AV ~ d Ja' ;oa'~! I ~~~d,~'`;~~a' 31S3HOOa AV 6~ g fs ~ 1D ~ ~'y~0a `a31`s3x~Dn ~ °~ayliro faro ~ "° of iw ~ o ~vyeb ~'\'V a ~zo aQ %r > ~ V' '4 ~hw~y NO s I s ~ I~ II~W~ ~~'~li ~^~' I ! ~~,.r'l~ai z i g 3 ` C ; ' m 8 rJ, ~ 006 ~ S ~ `' QY Y ~ { ` N3AMtM/M`N -MYn i i - \ a o- ~~c ~"s~/~ `~ ®/ J ISVW ` , ,.>, I } n' L_ '~ 1.~J ~t10 A?10171A I~ _ 0 - ~ ld ~ NO1S0H AY ~~~ OlV3jNg` nY ~T~ olvaene ~I~ i ,NI „y ~_ ~ \ I I ~L o r ~ U ~ ~`S lp ~ c W - I~WHJIa 6 I F~i~ ~_ nv p2 xn J ~ a ~ y~ Q o y`' ~ ~ ~ '~ ~ " ~° ~g ~ _' ~ tl3r1U -nm v +J AV § ar ~ ~ oao ~ ° ~ ~~ ®~~~ ` ~ s ~ ~, P~ ore s ~ ~ `^~ ntl ooze ~%: nv ~ zlo ~a _ $ lisan`esllld I ~ a = ~ ~ M9N~ ~ ~ g a a ~ rntw -' _ ~ ~ q~lc 00[=~ i ~ '" " of o9z oDI ' I ..I I , 4 b,6x` EN tK ~MMILI t ~iG _ - (.~ ~ - -- ~ . i laoa3sata9 OOS6 ~ G N3~Ill IW ti 0056 -' ~ ML2l p - t,}0~4Ia~w ~ a-- ~ - -- . a ~ I W T ~SN l.,! J N ~ le ~ ~ 05 wt3uvxV I F IrWAY VIEW I l i ~ '~j ~ ~m°`'~ `~ ~y m I ~~ °o^ y AV .~ OOLOI - ~ `I ~ ~g w ~ ~ ~ J g ]4 vo o~ m4 !~/ ly` 4xy_ t+'AI'''t „'~` ti Ylx~r~; ~ O = y i e C "~ I' A lJ P .l} N i " ii I' ~Ir{I'•'n ~ ~ el li, 1D d 9, Q9~~ F~rv s ~~N ~ ~(/iii ' k ~ AV ~~/ fib H37lIln) .". II ¢¢ y A 7 {I i} ;, y~1~"117 p, ' dC~ O N +l w~41 , 111 1:111 ~t _.! c I E1 ~ ' ~~ / ~ / ' 1J N 1 )°,~1 R -- ` (f , r.l A x '*M \ C Z $ ~ ~/.,1~ ~ f0. '~! / 4 !r t g ~~" ` L { ~, y~s~~ 2 (( U(P I++ ~..~~ o NY ~'b8 ~ ~~ 311HM ~ _ ~1 a . r~_ 1 nY Mtl0 II ~^ `J /`i I~~ I ~ .i , f ~ iy,..r 0009 -_~ 1 '4,j ' '~ `I I , ~ 31IHM I f f ° '}Y i ~I ~ rl ~{~ 111, 1;1 NONtlaYJYC o ~ 1 i ~l~i 7 I A ' 1 ~ ~~g f'- 4 ~ paa,,_~~ N N ~ Q ' tl ~ ( ~ 7 lk li~~^1 '~b~/ 3~naas ~ ~AV g ~ 3~• ~ ~ g o'N-y ® g Y 10 30I1S3ild y M " ~, ~__ ®t°_---~ ~ Z ~ DOE6 ONV73A310 ~~~ ° i yd rt ' '$ A N ~,p Q'1 Ca gYf~Y tllOM75 N ®I ~~++ 1 h` nZ~ ``Z` / y ^.S1 ` JQ. OP~ i { Res V~' i ~ tD tD rat \ - ` ~ d,C ~ ;Q U3il - ~0 ~I ~ .It--- ~---' ~I 15 Ntl0 034 ~ `~ I ~ ~ LL I AY O1NOtl ~..,°° m ; ~"...~. ., /q°' ""a I-- ~ ~ ~ ~ ' r 1 {~,Y ~4pJ G `Co C l ~ ~H~ 0 2 S~ I WAY YSw3W10d N Q z F--Y 2 5~ ~.._ ~ F n ~`' '~ '• `N ~ w } ~ ~~ ~la _ ~` ~ ' ~ a~ /~ j N ~39N ~ 3j~~~ i p u '' ' ~ / j ' S ASP~ U ems ~ I >~.,L--'" Atl ~ (~ _ tlOIN x ~ 0 `~ _ ~ _ \ 6i- ~Ey, p,m , _ I r -s t ,( ,,~~J z/ 1 ~ 2J 'y AMAdu ~1 s = b1S ~ I- ey , / d011f1 rr - { ~ I tl0I171 I A I r- I ~ ~ 1/ 1~ ° Atla ntl NOISNIM~ ~NOISNI • I M' f POP"/ x ~~ ~ `R L:j IA ~Ya31 yip I • k O ~ u ^ A c`il 0019 10 59 w.... 30U~OW OOCB i 0068 ,,, F~"'~' a ~ ^ 0016 ° _ _ ~I N3ntlH 006 DDB ^ o `x ntl ~ N3ntlH ~ N ~ Q ~ ntl ~~ N3ntlH o s ~ l ~ ONJNYa Intl r~N ~ a ~ ,n ~ x° ~ d CS g = z sNOI N u (~ S Op. ).. i ~~ _ ~ \~ W' N ~~ - ~~ ~ 1 ntl 3NI21VW {O ~' ~ 9l 55 [t~6 yjiN3 G ~~ J - AV iVI ~ $ ~ 5~~ ~ G ` --' C, _I ~ ~~I 3 L 11 ~' I `~~ ~~~~~ ~ " .~y.. W ~ Q ~ rn 3 ^ '^I `., ~ 8 k C € AY I a31N3D = ~ ' ~ l ' H31N3] r rAY hY N31N30 ro31N .~~' . ~.J N _...-~ "w r~,`~ '~ ZC ~~`.., g o Z u ~ ~ _ .. - U ~ Atl 1 ~„ ~ t731N30 e JN I ~- ~I o '^ +, ~ N Ia~ ~~~,,,~~ I C~ ' i 1 ~ --I: c~is~~_ ..rs Q G ~I lrisf5A 4~~-` ~ ~ 9 Ar OIiIT'd I ~1 3 ~ 1~ A~lY9 ~ h ~ ~3 ~ ' 4 } d ~ CY M N ntl o ~2 C N Q -rove asiS711 ~ tx ~ ~ "' N S d !"° ~~ I AY 11]°INSN d/13 _ { ~{ ~ ~ N sx~°a_ Ar IIX3A,rHiG ~lY 3X ~ w I~ ~ 015N33tl~_~G a'_a3n°wv ~ ~ ~i ~ I g ~ ~ 6334.1 ~ € q S 4 N33r1~~~ ~--I ~ ` Ts ~i '~iu.IAnoO u o 00B ro 0 ~ ° ^ ~'~AY 09 f_ o Z "83NaRl~ N - ~ z _ x Y I~AY INtl3hlYri 006 ODOR f ` 1 1 @ ~I )7~ ~~i.l~)S~vsv~l'n Ntl01td3llrd ~ 91°~I l°~~ _ 1 3 0058 ? ~ I 1 "'W 0069 ti DO£6 OD56 tlSOWa3H ~ - ----- I ti3Nan1 s.e ~.+ -Atl ~ _ - ~ ~O N r 7 ~t35 ~ xvvx i g Ix. ssurw,3 8r al Ar mro ~tg'-jO-' _I 55 llV~ssGf_ GG-{` GLL' mxn,~ 1~~ W`nr ~3wiNam _ VSOWa3H -nv"~1eNrcal ~ ~~ 1 Y J I na more+x3j~~ n3snax ao 3Nia j p ` _emo ua rYO~ ~ ° $!~ oH~~ ~ li m3 ~ ~ a Im x NI - z~G Oil ~ _.J 7 H9NYtl Stl701" ~ s \~~J'`ir , I I.~~ : , , a~i zti r~ w f o'` q 'ryiy ~~~ ~m ~ ~1 1dIi ~ ~~ W ~ e {k ~'~ ~gg %;SnPe 9u {~ = t a im131 ~ /n t ~ ~~ Pl'!'°~° I`~ ~ u ---~'-'~'"~ (__ i a0 tllj ~ ~ ~ 1 ~~~aD tlYa37~ G ~ Q ~- ~,. ~nn nm,^n s ~ m nr vx o ~ ' I am: (j5N8J F - ~ ' W ~` I ) II~vY { I , ~ u 4 '1 ~~ rl, { ~ JI~S~ o W I I g 1 _ _ _ I 1 I~ +n xoaxo, ° ~ n _- -_ _ _.r____. _,t I° is . I [ ~ ih ,= EXHIBIT A ~~ ~~~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ r z S R f t ~,~ -~ - r 1 ~~ ~ I 'j i~ 1 ~- - _ a ~ ~ ~ ~ , ~. ~ ~~~. '~ , y ~ ~ ~ +.~ a^ h °~''Tt iue:t~..,.,_ ., ,..xrwA.~waww ~" t r ~4 _ ,_ . r-n ,~ ~ '" v, "V bps-3.x$ ~~'„ j~~v ~, r~ a~.~! ~'MSL^"n `tn ~'4,~ , uQ a ~,, t~."a',~.~.~w ~t""4x"~M~ ~~ ~„'W"„~"'~.J~"'}" ~°" "k~ .8 ~a ~ zip YMy n4 !'~'~''''''r ~!~"3'~WM ~s 4'""~,~'", ~ v "r' i "~' ~' an .-z ~ ~ l ~~ ~~ ~ ~f ~+ ~ iii ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~r~"^"~ `°' ~'' 7 ,~+~'.a..i.~xrzr+~ai°r x, •(,z` ev~~r'r. a,~~°r n „ro `~s'~ ~ ~ 11'3 `°~d t~ ,f(~.t.~t+p~v^~hdM ~n~~~~^Q'~ta~4f'F ""f'A,'t'~t'1~(~~,,,~.. ~„~ .,~s~~_~ #~w k.'..~'.,~.a.....,.. ~,ns..,.. x .:.~~.c~t~usL,dtrxa'4.c~st*,Wr~e'@um~lkc+2ur~4t~h "~'~'km ~,~.'_~ ai'ra,~° ,!t-iii ~. ~ -dr) r x -~` {~ rw {x ~~`~, µt ~ ' r°1~`. mf ti~+ a1~`'` ,hP ~,~~'~,.~~"u fj ~~~~~~ s ~r '-~ ~'-x~ ~ t~~ ~~~ia ~ ~ , ~ »..r+N .~~+rbX4.?Y.~°r~~4j~UA~~FU. , ...., ' r ~ es"d » N µ ~,~ 3 ~ ~ a 2 ., ~~~'kb ,. . , T ~ ~~ d _ ~ ~iary°hk^y. ~~h "~ p ~ w ~~~~ ~ ~ i ~ C~ ~ ~~~ ~ r ~ ppeg y (('~ p~R~E~~ ~~~ fib r~ n~ ~,yd rh>, sh' Y' VNSM'~B 1*.~~~ .t 4rirme ~ ~A„.",r¢,~yM ,.+r >fi-n,w4,~+r"'aay"d ~~~~~ ~,..t w~ ~ ~ ~7 ~~ ~x/ a~3g ~ ~~+,e ~rr``t~4'nr~rS~'+q~ba ~i "~iax , r~ {~~hrs4« a ";~w d~~x~~ { ~ ~' ~~~~ ~ ._~ ~; j~, fly lai :;.~~ x ~ ar ¢~~Y w ~.rqr„~ ~kx ~ ``~;V4; ",,3' >"~„ ~i+ od"+:~^e"~~"~~ '~ ~ * ? ~.~ ~"~`]g o- „-~ ~ ~ ~~ .rtr,~ . ~ t~+! ~~,C~a ai k e, ~ y ~~ "~ ~ ~ rd~. . ,.r s'~ ~ r y 1 ' `_' ,~' )u ~~ ~ ~~ ~ ` ~ t; ~~q~ pf' ~ '° `"4 x~J~.' +'NM1~~ .~" ~',+ „ 6.~'~+p~ ~ 1 ~ ~ '~ fy y 3 th L J ti ~ .r F @i ~ S _ _ ~4 ~µ ~ Lt~ ,{ ~~~a~~,~ Project Site~,~ - ~ ~:y ~~~,~~~ ~.~,,`~~;~ ,~ ~ s ~, a ~, ~ ~,~,,~ ~, ~~ ~. r t r d '~ mss-. ~ ` ;~~'' 45iS4 °~ ,. ', "' ' ~`~~~5'"'"a ~ r ,~~~ .#~ -s~~`s~C~l~~yt' ~ xl Si StJ..- _ ~,.rh. ~+ ~'~6 v`rxn ~ ,~,1 ~,°~i ~ ~t o- ~~ ~~~ ,. # " ~~~~ A~ ~ t t ~}} ~'~ ~ W ',4 F y~.~,a't~j .~. ~_I7d ~ ~ y,. rrY~A~_~p~ "~7~ r . ` .~ ,.,, ~~~af~ ~ .,~„~yi~'~+~''µ`~y1. ~ ~ ~ ;i ~~ wt~*f' ~~ ~5~" ~"S, ~ '" ~k" .,p i F ~ '4 ~ ~ ~'Ih" *" w k KR" " Y 'w!'Y~ ~ 3 ~~ -j' e ~ .JM a rt' 'h r ~ ~1 ~ ~ i4i h V, ~~+ M ^( 'Si ro^ ~y x + tfi ~ e ~~. _. _ ~ ~ { k "7~, .. aaY U r ~~,.., r. k ~ ~ ' a ~..~5„" r. ~ ~ iu.n ..~ ~~ #~ _~ rp );t" t . r~ a ~ ~ u'ar •'.~ .~ rc S 4::~~ .. -. ~~ _.__~ °•3 I ~ ~r Cy F r EXHIBIT B y ~ ~~ ~ ~~ F '~ay 4 A,- x ~;. -iF` Y/' py~ iY ~, i~ leh +Y ,y icy ~ ~ }~ ~} ~x~d~ f ~'Mu~u*~`M~~ ~~' ~~r * ~, 1~ a #~ Fa Y` ~ fylt s ~ Y ~ ~ L «~ r ~' . ~7 ~ f ~ ^9 ~Z ~ ~ ` i ~y'# ~yW w f } v r ~ ,~~ r ~y' ~ ~ t r .r~ q p ~ F ! 7 t ti ~ n k r` 4 ~ ~ g . ~r ';' ~ ,fi n r- 9 t ` , ~ , pq~,~ i J iM ~y ~ S• ~ i ~!7 4 e s ~1F s ~ r 'i 11r~ 1"~ xMV ~ , . ,:~' ~ rr ri ,~ _ T ~ o "}~R i~ ~ 4 i R ~ k ;~~ ^iK'43 L Y~ ,g~~ 1 ~ ~ . ... ,+ ~ t '~ ~ c ~ ~4„' -# M~, +~ny.r.'~ 6~'+,~-. # ,ate ~~ .~ ~ ~ .,..< *~' ~ ~+~ + x ~Fv+ftl~" ,} ~ y ~ , ,. 3 Y ..I. ~` y'"~ ' a ly ~q ~ ~ Yu x£~ tPs.~°t ~j~ ~i-w ~~ {s u t4 ~, ?~A~~dl~ ~~ h. l7pNre~ a ~ , A~ t ~F ~~ dX '~ Nj ~s3g 8S00-9002 ~~Q Ntfld 311S ~/ 6CL16 YJ 7JNOYf40(10 ONONtl2! ~ 3Atl tlONtlMi13 93111021 M02RN SZ6Zl ~ € ~ °•°°°° 1N`ddf1d1S3b QOOd 1Sd~ aNd J,.Llll~dd Odd M3N ~" N , ~ ~ ' .= « ., n $ P s ~~ ~ ~~ ~a ~ ~ Q N « N ~n~ ~n~ J ~ ~d ~~ge a ~~~~~~ € e t E ~ 8a~~ n~~J~~~ & f °$~ ~~ ii ~~55W I W N$ $ M o N tl ~ s ~ N N 4wlN N* g 8 7i~ ~~~' W S~ ~ S~ p ~]Z s p ~ N ~a ~d 83 ~s ~~~ es pis ~ ~ ~~:g i ~~<,o~~ ~$~ F~ °~ § g •~ ~ ~3~ ~~~ o~~ ~ ~ ~~~~a~~a~aa~ s~ gg z °= s ~° § p~ ~ _ - 1~ ~a ~ a w=~ tNV. .wry - ~ o n .c~i~ ~- i~-« _ ~ \ ~ FNVN un1 (~ \ ~ rac O 4 R 0 4 ! e 1 b b e 1 e n n ti ~ ~ ~.,~ ~II o' ~ ~b z - o~ ~~ tlYz oy$3 ~ i tlL 2 ~~~ i .5~.. "aZa i g e~gx ~ 9o SIY pp l :tl3 s ~.. ~ off: f ~ =-F9 ~ L'yt c. I _g i Wg~3 -} ' 7a: $ i ~'g„ t ! ~£ • T ee~3 ~~ 3~ z Q ~ ~E a p n o v j O a ~,-r t-a s-a ~ .~.~ 1 ~\ } O ~y . .G~ ~ N Y j ~ n 1a -- -------ti{~-----~---------- --------------- y _ ~ I ,a _ _ _ _ ys...., *_(~ ~~Et fir/ II~~ .~X ~ i~ -~/ J ti9 n(f ~/IN.>TAY~YONYi~/.t.~ i q II I =~ I I EXHIBIT ~ ~~ a • • ~~.„.°s^°X,(ts= Nd~d ONIOdNO ~df11d.~ON00 Q ~ Ill/// 6fL 16 V'J V~NOYiV~t1J OH~Ntl21 ~ 3/~V vONVMi13 ~ 31n08 NOili1V SZ6Z1 e a °°~_~°°°~ 1NdN(lb'1S_ld 000 1St~~ aN'd J,11~IOd~ OONd M3N _ ~~ C7 • Z Q J Qa ~ 3 .d Ip3JB ^ a 3a ~ -~ _-- - v wa __ - W m ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ : J^v Wtl3a _ $ ~ ~ 3^Y Y~NIM113 ~ sil Avw33a3 Imwo ~V ~ N3NIltiP~ < rr ~ ~ O Q° 1 vQ o ~ ~ ~~- ~ ~Q ~~ QQQ^ ~ x s O ~ V z ~ .~ ~ o U V i = O s ~ z~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~. r O W ~ O _- v N ~~. ~~ V _ _ Y ~~ ~ Q k~ la •i - EXHIBIT D pX ~'~ ~' ~ ~ ~ SY~'~ ~~ ~ ~~ x° a~ a ~ ~~~m ~a V~~4ss~~~;~~~~-°e ~ P m e¢xe E~~~ $ -~ ~~ °^ y ~Y ~ ~~ Pk ~~k~{b~ ~RU§"~~ ~~ 3 ~~zi ~F1 1 - ~ ~~v~ [ ~ a~ qq E~ ~ .., ~ drn I a' `~ ~ g~ ^'~ ~ ~ ` ~ 1tp y r F- 2 = a 9 ~ ¢` y~ 9 ~n Yt ~ as ~ W r~ ~ o 6 a ~ b ~ ¢i,s !~ ~ 'e~F ~ 5 ~~'~ 2 ~ M1 s ~ 3; y ~ g ~ ~' ~ ~ as o^ ~ q4~~ E ~~ ~ g 3 r ~ Z$N2~tl~a~~3 §abC°,i ~3~ ~ O ~ K~i3 ~ l~~$~~~~~~~~#~~~~~~~ t l n Sr r w~gk~ §a a ~, a - k R ~ ~ y ~ ~ ° ; ° z ~E-Z ~~ ~T u ~ yW ~Op °~ O d ~ ~ t i - - ° Wio °O~x W Q O w ~ ~ & °? °Y r U N V y m j pw W A11 - '~ 2 - nl w0 N - oW o~ ~= o e> e . " z~ aI f o N a ~ - W o x oo Qo~ a~ .o : ~.od W wn wo W o _: _ ~ y ~~ a o -o oooo~ ooo~o® ~ ~~ v~ =" ~ ~ g ~ J = ~ ~i ~ ' W w ~_ _,. ~ o ~ ~~~ L 'I~ =~~ ~a a~.~a ~ 4 ~ °~ ~a ~~ :~~ aIa 0 N ~ ~ ~ =1 - ~~. ~3 ~- ~, - ,a :° x - ai ~ t 4 xx - xx a Q ? _- v ~"--'-- - - a _ ~ ~ L/ ~,~ ~~-~~ _ ~1 R ~B ~ 9 ~ ~ as 3y R ~ I =aw x ., w o ' ~~ ~~. ~~ ~~ wig o ~ 1~-~^ ° ~x _ - \~ .~a e ! a^ ,"eb_ J ~ ~~J ~~ w~ Ixm G ~\ J F-6 N9~ a o Ndld ~OOI~ aNd SNOIld/~313 HSdM ~d~ - ~Nlali(18 Wd/Wd N 6fL16 YJ YJNOYIYJ00 ONONra ~ ~ 3nr raNrxu3 0 3moa x~oaar szsz~ ~ iniuunuir~~i nnn i ic~u i nniu i ininu i nnniu ~~~ni ~U ~ l , ' ~ I ; + ~ ~ F t M1 ~ ` &S i ( ~ ~{ ~y & ~ ~ t l~t~ Il s t :L:: wl~l[[i~ a ~~0 w ~ ilat ~ t i ,~~tt~i~i w iil~~i~i~it~l;;~~ti Y Q Q r • • EXHIBIT E ~, • J t~ t> t£ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~= y ~ 7 ~ ~ _ ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ; / i [ t ~ W g 1 1 a E 0 0 ~ f 0 0 "s ~~ S~ ~ ~~ E J C E e 0 4 ~~JJ , ~~ ~gd ~ i ' ~ ~ ~ ~ s ~ ~ ~ ~ f ~3~~~~ o 11~[It~~ ~ ~ ' ` It9i~;~Ei~ ~ ~~~ o .~~. .... -~- ( ~ I{ A b 9 6 B F a 6 t i ~ , g ~~; r ~~ ~ ' NEW ARCO FACILITY AND FAST FOOD RESTAURANT ~,„,pw,E„° ~ ~ 12925 AfiROW ROUTE 0 ETIWANDA AVE I RgNCHO CUCAAIONCA CA 91739 """ °'° °, ~ -~ D TRELLIS-TRASH ELEVATIONS AND SECTIONS DESIGN F-8 EX N~is~a SNOIld~3~3 aNd Nb'ld b00~d J,dONdO ~. ` ~ da ~ 6fL16 YO YJNOYMJ00 OHONYd ~ Li 3AY VONtlM03 A ilfl0a MOaiN SZ6Zt ~ °_°°°° 1Ndd(1d1S3d QOOd 1Sdd aNb ,1111I0dd OOdd M3N , a ;" V . e Y~ i ~' 6 ~ I ~ I I i ~ ~ i 1 W~- ~ wl~~~~ ~ 6~ ~ r ya'' '~a* ''~`i SA I ~®" ® "®A "~A 1 Y_ m ~ s' 1 I I I 1 I I I I I ~ ~~ _~ •r ~f W ~~ ~; ~i a HIBIT F _9 • • • • • EXI N~is~a Nbld ~OOI~ aNd SNOIldA3~3 ~Nla~l(18 Q00~ 1Sd~ ~, `- ~ +~,o, 6CL16 YJ rJN01(rJfl~ OH~Nra ~ ~nr ruHrnw3 0 ~noa xoaw szszt ~ a °°°°° 1Nd~f1d1S3~ Q00~ 1Sd~ aNd ,lllll~d~ O~~b M3N . a ;" l ~ ~ )1 y 4 l E 6 E 6 f ~~~ ~~ ~ ~ I' a S a 8 S } € ~~b ` ~- ~~ ^ ~o - ~n0 s' LLO LL ~ ~ I ~~ ^ ! \ F ^ ~ ~i o~ ~~ F }}J usi$ mi r ~~ -r ~t~~ i ^ ~~ ~ IIsQ~ ~.~~ o w a~ Z ~ I~ LL LL ~ w ~_ H ^ f ^ ~~ a 1©mmm ^ ~i r N ~ ~ 'd ^ p ~~~ °o °~ a ..i LL w ' o~ ~ ~ e ~ yid 71 ~ w Il~~iiililli~i O~ Y~ HIBI~ Ca ,o N9~3,u 3 9 ~~d ~ ~ 0 ~~~ ~ ~ aa~~ ~ ~ a 0 [ ! 0 e ~ t~i t ~ ~ ! `~9 app ~ i~ ~ N X M ~ c _ ~ $: ~ ~` } 4 4 9 ~ 4 >~ A~ A ~ (7 DD N O~ z~ U$ \/ Wdd~Odd N~IS ~, 6CL16 YJ YJNOIfVO(10 OHJNdN I d 3Atl tlOM/Mfl3 0 31fI0N MOaiN Sl6Zl ~ 1Nddfl'd1S3d Q00~ 1Sd~ aNd J~Llll~d~ Odd M3N , ~ ;" W Q Z J J ~ 4 J u J ~ Q Z D: ~ e ~ Z t W W 4 ~ 1 Q 8 ~_ N J J Q il~li,l. ,~ .I ~ O z ~ ~ o -4 OF a ~ ~ l- t~ M „Ol-,Ol = w 3 ~ ~ LL ~~ > Q J U w N ~131~ ~ ,9- Z U Z w 0 z g a m h I 2 C7 N H Z W Z 0 N J W U ~ R a4 C7 Z U a EXHIBIT H ----f„ - --~- ~nrii r re,v ri ile DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 7 00 p m Mike Smith September 18, 2007 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2006-00580 - MARK SATER - An application to construct two buildings, a 2,900 square foot gas station convenience store with a carwash tunnel and a 1,800 square foot drive-thru, fast-food restaurant on a 1 75 acre of land in the General Industrial District (Subarea 8), located at 12925 Arrow Route (southeast corner of Arrow Route and Etiwanda Avenue) - APNs 0229-141-11 and 0229-141-10 Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration Design Parameters The proposed commercial center will be located at the southeast corner of Arrow Route and Etiwanda Avenue on a partially vacant parcel of about 2 07 acres The project site consists of two parcels with combined dimensions of about 300 feet (north-south) by 314 feet (east-west) The site is partially vacant, on the south parcel (about one-third of the overall project site) there is a single-story building of about 11, 700 square feet The north parcel is dominated by short grass The property is bound on the east by a vacant parcel To the north across Arrow Route is the Victoria Woods apartment complex while to the south is an outdoor vehicle and materials storage facility with a small building Across the street to the west is Ameron, Inc , a concrete pipe manufacturing and storage facility The zoning of the property, the properties to the east and south is General Industrial (GI) District, Subarea 8 while the property to the west is zoned Heavy Industrial (HI) District, Subarea 15 The zoning of the property to the north is Medium (M) Residential, Etiwanda Specific Plan, South • Overlay The subject property is generally level with an elevation at the north and south sides of about 1158 feet and 1151 feet, respectively The applicant proposes a commercial complex consisting of an ARCO AM-PM auto service court gas station/convenience store, an automated carwash, and a fast food restaurant with adrive-thru The existing structure will be removed The gas station/convenience store will situated at the northwest corner of the site The restaurant will be located at the southeast corner of the site The canopy over the gas pumps will be located along the north side of the site There will be two points of access -one via Etiwanda Avenue and another via Arrow Route Forty-eight parking stalls for employees and customers will be provided Landscape coverage is 15 percent, the minimum requirement is 12 percent for this development district The proposed buildings will be a conventional type of construction consisting of wood or steel framing The exteriors will be finished with stucco in a palette of four different colors An additional primary material will be river rock veneer while a secondary material will be glass panels Key features at the convenience store include 'tower' elements with tale roofs, a raised parapet with cornice, and a trellis element that covers the maJority of the drive aisle leading to the automated car wash Storefront glass is shown on the east and south elevation of the convenience store but not along the west and north elevations (the elevation facing the streets) Key features of the restaurant include a 'tower' element with a the roof over the entrance, a raised parapet with a cornice element There will be atrellis-covered outdoor patio area near the front entrance and trellises over the drive-thru lane Storefront glass has been provided on the west elevation of the restaurant but is only sparingly applied on the north and south elevations, there is no glass on the east elevation (although this is probably an error as the 'pay window' is on this side) taff Comments The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion • EXHIBIT I ,,, DRC ACTION AGENDA -MARK SATER September 18, 2007 Page 2 Mayor Issues The following broad design issues will be the focus of the Committee's discussion regarding this project The project site is located at the important intersection of Arrow Route and Etiwanda Avenue Both streets are classified as "special boulevards" and "mayor arterials" according to the Development Code and the General Plan, respectively The level of traffic and visibility along these streets is high and is a potential focal point for the City Therefore, the architecture should be enhanced to emphasize this importance Recommendations include the additional application of materials, greater variation in architectural elements, and emphasis of key features Tower elements should appear to be towers and not simply raised parts of the building 2 Revise the landscaping (berms, plants, and/or screen walls) to effectively screen the car wash and the gas pumps 3 Revise the landscaping (berms, plants, and/or screen walls) at the northwest corner of the project site to reinforce the importance of the street intersection • 4 Increase the horizontal dimension of the landscaped area (measured from the back of sidewalk to the parking lot/dnve aisle} along Arrow Route as the site currently does not meet the minimum landscape depth required by the Development Code It is recommended that you narrow the width of the drive aisle that is immediately adjacent to the northernmost gas pumps to accommodate this 5 Eliminate the segment of the drive-thru lane that extends beyond the second row of parking stalls -OR- close-off the entry closest to the building so that there is only one entry into the drive-thru lane and the potential for 'wrong' way traffic is eliminated In this location place additional landscaping (see attached) Provide a Uniform Sign Program for the Design Review Committee's review and recommendation prior to the project being scheduled for Planning Commission consideration Secondary Issues Once all of the mayor issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues Eliminate the word "Entrance" and "Exit" above the entry and exit of the car wash These types of signs should be mounted on the ground (as directional's) and are subject to the City's Sign Ordinance Move the trash enclosure from its current location at the south side of the car wash to the east side of the project site next to the trash enclosure for the restaurant Combine the trash enclosures into a larger unit All trash enclosure shall have roll-up doors per City Standard 3 Add climbing vines along the perimeter wrought iron fencing Policy Issues The following items are a matter of Planning Commission policy and should be incorporated into the project design without discussion All ground-mounted equipment, utility boxes including transformers, and back-flow devices shall be surrounded by a minimum of two rows of shrubs spaced a minimum of 18 inches on center F13 • DRC ACTION AGENDA -MARK SATER September 18, 2007 Page 3 2 All doors (roll-up, dock doors, emergency access) shall be painted to match the color of the adjacent wall or glass panel 3 Wherever river rock is used, it shall be real aver rock and not a veneer Staff Recommendation Staff recommends that the project be revised, as noted above, and resubmitted for review by the Committee prior to being forwarded to the Planning Commission for review and action Design Review Committee Action The applicant revised the project to include the following a Increased landscaping along Arrow Route to comply with the minimum landscape depth required along Mayor/Special Arterial Corridors per Section 17 30 040-D b Eliminated one of the entrances to the drive-thru lane as noted above c Re-located the trash enclosure as noted above The Committee directed the applicant to revise the application as follows and resubmit the • application for afollow-up review as a regular item a Enhance the tower elements at the northwest corner of the convenience store and at the entrance to the fast food restaurant Raise their height and project their `legs' further out from each building's respective primary wall plane Also, embellish the upper portions of the tower to provide more character b Add glass along the west elevation and northwest corner of the convenience store c Change the proposed roofing material to barrel tale to match the architectural theme d Revise the bases of all column elements so that they are vertical (i e eliminate the flared bases) e Provide 3' - 4' high planters along the base of the trellis located over the drive aisle leading to the car wash f Provide intensive landscaping with a 3' high berm and 3' high wall so that the entrance to the carwash is screened from Etiwanda Avenue g Provide trellises along the east elevation to balance the trellis on the west elevation h No fluorescent lighting or metal on the gas station canopy The materials/finish used on the main buildings shall be incorporated into the design of the canopy i The Committee emphasized that the buildings must have "360-degree" architecture and that revisions to the fast food restaurant shall reflect the revisions to the convenience store • f Provide an accurate materials and color board F14 DRC ACTION AGENDA -MARK SATER • September 18, 2007 Page 4 Staff Planner Mike Smith Members Present Stewart, Munoz, and Nicholson C F15 • DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 7 20 p m Mike Smith October 16, 2007 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2006-00580 - MARK SATER - A request to construct a commercial center consisting of an auto service court (2,900 square foot gas station with convenience store and carwash) and a fast food restaurant of 1,800 square feet on 2 07 acres of land in the General Industrial (GI) District, Subarea 8, located at the southeast corner of Arrow Route and Etiwanda Avenue - APN 0229-141-10 and -11 Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration Background This application was reviewed by the Design Review Committee (DRC) on September 18, 2007 At that time, staff presented the project and proposed revisions The Committee provided additional comments and revisions (see attached) On October 4, 2007, staff met with the applicant and his client to further discuss the items below Following that meeting, the applicant stated he would revise the project to address the comments below and bring a revised set of plans for discussion with the Committee Design Parameters See attached for a summary of design parameters Staff Comments The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion • Ma1or Issues The following were revisions requested by staff and the Committee The applicant's revisions are in italics Enhance the tower elements at the northwest corner of the convenience store and at the entrance to the fast food restaurant Raise their height and project their "legs" further out from the respective primary wall plane of each building Also, embellish the upper portions of the tower to provide more character The applrcant has revrsed the tower elements at the marn entrances to the convenrence store and fast food restaurant The "legs" of both now protect beyond the fascia of each burldrng and provide a focal point for each entrance However, the "legs" of the northwest tower were not shifted outward as requested He has also elrrnrnated unnecessary features at the upper portions of the tower 2 Add glass along the west elevation and northwest corner of the convenience store The applrcant added glass along the west elevation, but not at the northwest corner, of the convenrence store Staff comment Staff recommends that the northwest tower element be revised This tower element is highly visible and the revisions submitted thus far address only some of the Committee's concerns 3 Change the proposed roofing material to barrel tale to match the architectural theme Done EXHIBIT J „s DRC ACTION AGENDA DRC2006-00580 -MARK SATER October 16, 2007 Page 2 4 Revise the bases of all column elements so that they are vertical (i e eliminate the flared bases) Done 5 Provide 3-foot to 4-foot high planters along the base of the trellis located over the drive aisle leading to the car wash Done The applicant has added the requested wall with a aver rock finish The portions of the wall closest to the entrance to the carwash building are taller to better screen the activities and equipment reside Staff comment Staff believes this revision meets the intent of the Committee 6 Provide intensive landscaping with a 3-foot high berm and 3-foot high wall so that the entrance to the carwash is screened from Etiwanda Avenue Done The applicant has added the requested wall with a ever rock finish and berm Staff comment Staff believes this revision meets the intent of the Committee 7 Provide trellises along the east elevation to balance the trellis on the west elevation The applicant indicates that he was not able to do this because there was not enough room Staff comment The Committee indicated that the applicant should explore this option The • absence of the trellis is acceptable 8 No fluorescent lighting or metal on the gas station canopy The materials/finish used on the main buildings shall be incorporated into the design of the canopy No fluorescent lighting rs shown on the revised canopy The canopy will have a stucco finish and roof design (and the material) to match the main buildings Staff comment Acceptable as revised 9 The Committee emphasized that the buildings must have "360-degree" architecture and that revisions to the fast food restaurant shall reflect the revisions to the convenience store The applicant has eliminated extraneous details that were shown on the upper half of the buildings and replaced them with relatively simple foam trimmed squares Staff comment Staff suggests that these features should be depressed into the building fascias to provide depth The foam by itself is a "tack-on" solution Furthermore, there should be color contrast He has also added glass on the west elevation of the convenience store No glass has been added to the restaurant Staff comment Staff recommends that glass be added to the restaurant to meet the intent of "360-degree" architecture F17 DRC ACTION AGENDA DRC2006-00580 -MARK SATER • October 16, 2007 Page 3 10 Provide an accurate materials and color board Done 11 Staff comment Based on further review, the following issues must be addressed Provide construction details for the proposed trellis on the west side of the building Of particular concern is how the curved sections of the trellis will be built b Show details of "rock" veneer to be placed at the base of the pilasters shown on the building These elements appear to have no depth and could look like more "tack-on" elements if not designed properly Signs The following are comments relating to the signs During the previous DRC meeting, the applicant requested clarification regarding the signs Per the Sign Ordinance, Section 14 20 100, Class 4a of the Municipal Code, the maximum number of signs permitted is three, i e two wall signs and one monument sign OR one wall sign and two monument signs As proposed, there are three wall signs and one monument sign One of these signs will have to be deleted • b The logo boxes on the canopies are counted as signs because logos are signs Therefore, the logo boxes will have to be deleted Per the Sign Ordinance, Section 14 20 110, Class 1 of the Municipal Code, the restaurant, as it is not part of the convenience store/gas station and is on a separate parcel, is permitted to have a maximum of three signs A monument sign is permitted (and will be counted as one of the three allowed), but only at Etiwanda Avenue, as the parcel the fast food restaurant is situated on only has frontage on that street d See attached excerpts of the Sign Ordinance Staff Recommendation Staff recommends that the project be revised, as noted above, and resubmitted for review by the Committee prior to being forwarded to the Planning Commission for review and action Attachments Design Review Committee Action Members Present Munoz, Stewart, Nicholson Staff Planner Mike Smith The applicant submitted revised elevations that incorporated the changes as suggested by staff and the Committee at their previous September 18, 2007, meeting Specifically, the tower elements were further enhanced, barrel tale roofing material was added to match the architectural theme, planters were added F18 DRC ACTION AGENDA DRC2006-00580 - MARK SATER • October 16, 2007 Page 4 along the base of the primary trellis structure, no fluorescent lighting or metal fascia was used for the gas station canopy since the Committee requested that the finished materials for the canopy be consistent with the main buildings, and construction details were provided for the proposed trellis over the drive aisle to the car wash The Committee recommended approval of the revised proposal to the Planning Commission subject to the following additional revisions being completed pnor to the project going before the Planning Commission 1 Real "river rock" shall be indicated on the final plans as well as on the material sample board 2 Per Sign Ordinance, Section 14 20 1 10, Class 1 of the Municipal Code, the restaurant, which is on a separate parcel, is permitted to have a maximum of three signs 3 Provide one-way glass for the carwash windows for aesthetic purposes 4 All of the trellis structure shall be finished with a compatible brown colored material 5 There shall be no "fast food" signage on the Arco monument sign • • F19 ~~~ <'' }-~ ENVIRONMENTAL ,~ INFORMATION FORM Part I -Initial Stud ~ Y) City of Rancho Cucamonga (Please type or print clearly using ink Use the tab key to move from one !me to the next line ) Planrnng Dro~s~on (909)477-2750 The purpose of this form is to inform the City of the basic components of the proposed project so that the City may review the project pursuant to City Policies, Ordinances, and Guidelines; the California Environmental Quality Act; and the City's Rules and Procedures to Implement CEQA. It is important that the information requested in this application be provided in full. Upon review of the completed Initial Study Part I and the development application, additional information such as, but not limited to, traffic, noise, biological, drainage, and geological reports maybe required. The project application will not be deemed complete unless the identified special studies/reports are submitted for review and accepted as complete and adequate. The project application will not be scheduled for Committees' review unless afl required reports are submitted and deemed complete for staff to prepare the Initial Study Part,ll as required by CEQA. In addition to the filing fee, the applicant will be responsible to pay or reimburse the City, its agents, officers, and/or consultants for all costs for the preparation, review, analysis, recommendations, mitigations, etc., of any special studies or reports. INCOMPLETE APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE PROCESSED Please note that rt rs the responsrbrlity of the applicant to ensure that the appl~catron is complete at the time of submrttal, Crty staff wdl not be avatlab/e to pen`orm work required to prowde mrssrng tnforma6on Appl~catron Number for the project to which this form pertains Protect Title Name & Address of project owner(s) /y/,g-~ EXHIBIT K 7O0 ,mod ~ G~// Thy ~jGLlUE /,y~'~J '/s C~-. 9~7~0~ udy Part1 docPag~ 20 10 Rev 3/17/04 Contact Person & Address S1-ll~j~' ~S Q GlJ~/,~ ~ • Name & Address of person preparing this form (rf different from above) ~,~x C~~ C~U,C (,~~ ~,~~s ~ ~ ~o vs.~ ~~J ~l S'~~y~~~so~v .~1~ ~~ C~ ~ ~ 3~ l Telephone Number *1) Provide a full scale (8-1/2 x 71) copy of the USGS Quadrant Sheet(s) which includes the project site, and indicate the site boundaries 2) Provide a set of color photographs that show representative views into the site from the north, south, east, and west, views into and from the site from the primary access points that serve the site, and representative wews of significant features from the site Include a map showing location of each photograph 3) Project Location (describe) ~ ~~ ~~r ~~~ ~ ~~~'~~ ~~ D 4) Assessor's Parcel Numbers (attach additional sheet rf necessary) D~~ 9 _ I f~ / _, f _ OQO,~ *5) Gross Sife Area (ac/sq ft) ~~ ~ ~ 7_ / ~ • ~~" *6) Net Srte Area (total site size minus area of public streets & proposed dedications) 7) Describe any proposed general plan amendment or zone change whrch would affect the project site (attach additional sheet rf necessary) • I \PLANNINGIFINALIFORMSICOUNTER\Irntial Study Part1 docPape2~of 10 Rev 3!17/04 Information indicated by an asterisk (*) rs not required of non-construction CUP's unless otherwise requested by staff r 8) Include a description of all permits which wdl be necessary from the City of Rancho Cucamonga and othergovernmental agencies rn order to fully implement the project 9) Describe the physical setting of the site as rt exists before the project rnc/ud~ng rnformatron on topography, spil stability, plants and animals, mature trees, trails and roads, drainage courses, and scenic aspects Describe any existing structures on s-te (including age and cond~tron) and the use of the structures Attach photographs of significant features described In addition, cite all sources of information (i a ,geological and/or hydrologic studies, b-ot~c and archeological surveys, traffic studies) ~-5 I ~E I S ~ ~f cS . r' GD2htt 2 D~ ~`t/~~w Lo~~ ~~p r~ ~i7`~ ,S.r • ~~ % S ~~? p / ~r , GOV~,Q.~.D 6!/i ,iff ~.~~2 ! ~t~r/~ ~,s~~~ s 10) Describe the known cultural and/or historical aspects of the site Crte all sources of rnformatron (books, published reports and oral history) /Voi~% ,~~clo u-'N I \PLANNINGIFINAL\FORMS\COUNTER\Initial Study Part1 docPage 3 of 10 Rev 3/17/04 F 22 11) Describe any Horse sources and them levels that now affect the site (aircraft, roadway Horse, etc) and how they will affect proposed uses ~~4/~~ 12) Descnbe the proposed project rn detail Thrs should provide an adequate description of the site in terms of ultimate use that will result from the proposed project Indicate if there are proposed phases for development, the exfent of development to occur with each phase, and the anticippted completion of each increment Attach additional sheet(s) if necessary " ~1?.•4~r~%G ~rf E~ N~ ~~P/Zo tli it/1 ~~tl ~~,w ~~Y,(D ~i~F, C~~c1o~y GUr'f~ -~ ~/~S~'~N.I~~.S o ~ ~ C~~ L ai~s~~ ''stif>~1~ ~2UC~c' ~N~ ~i~r~/ ~~~ /Il~~ ~.~cf~vo~ f~~Cf,~~-~ f G!/1''~,u ..~,~'v~ - 7~} ~,~U .f;~r2.yry~. 13) Descnbe the surrounding properties, including information on plants and animals and any cultural, historical, or scenic aspects Indicate the type of land use (residential, commercial, etc ), intensity of land use (one-family, apartment houses, shops, department stores, etc) and scale of development (height, frontage, setback, rear yard, etc ) -1- ^ - - y - ~ ~ - - ~ ~- i G>~ ~~' 7` o~ ~~~~~~y Co•~~~~ ra r~/ ~~oss ~ 7`~~'u~~N~~ Sri, it .~~~0~ ~',~oT'~~y GD..lr1i1~~ u,¢- ~~ ~tiii~ ~y X07 a 14) Will the proposed project change the paftern, scale, or character of the surrounding general area of the project ~- ~ s u~ 2 ~o -- o n ~ •~ I \PLANNING\FINAL\FORMSICOUNTER\irntial Study Part1 docPage 4 of 10 Rev 3/17/04 • F 23 ~~~cy ~r¢-~tl~ SC ~p i ~~ ~~~- ~ ~~ryiytlc5 ~ ~~~-uJ ~/LGO , ~'~ ~ /~~ GO,KI ~t/~ N% ~NCF ~ ~~ ~,f// /,~{ ~~ s~~ ~ 15) Indicate fhe type of short-term and long-term Horse to be generated, including source and amount How will these nose levels affect adjacent properties and on-site uses What methods of soundproofing are proposed / C.~F-~ CD jYJ ~!L ~/ G ~ Ohr /Sl0/~, • "'16) Indreate proposed removals and/or replacements of mature or scernc trees ~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~- 17) Indreate any bodies of water (rncludrng domestic water supplies) into which the site drams ,/• ('~~~2 18) Indicate expected amount of water usage (See Attachment A for usage estimates) For further c/araticat~on, please contact the Cucamonga Valley Water Distract at 987-2591 • a Resrdentral (gal/day) Peak use (gal/Day) ~~ b Commercial//rail (gal/day/ac) ,Z,,~QO Peak use (gal/mrn/ac) 19) Indreate proposed method of sewage disposal ^ Septic Tank Sewer If septic tanks are proposed, attach percolation tests If discharge to a sanitary sewage system is proposed indicate expected daily sewage generation (See Attachment A for usage estimates) For further clar~t7cat~on, please contact the Cucamonga Valley Water Distract at 987-2591 a Resrdentral (gal/day) b CommercralAndustrral (gal/day/ac) ~~ ~'D RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS: ~~ 20) Number of resrdenfral units Detached (indicate range of parcel sizes, minimum lot size and maximum lot size Attached (indicate whether units are rental or for sale units) • I \PLANNING\FINAL\FORMSICOUNTER1lrntial Study Part1 docPage 5 of 10 Rev 3/17104 F 24 27) Anticipated range of sale paces and/or rents ~~~ Sale Pace(s) $ to $ Rent (per month) $ to $ 22) Specify number of bedrooms by unit type • 23) Indicate anfrcrpated household size by unit type ~~ 24) Indicate the expected number of school children who wdi be residing w~thrn the project Contact the appropriate School Districts as shown m Attachment B ~' / ~^ a Elementary V ` r'i" b Junior High / c Senior High COMMERCIAL, INDUSTRIAL, AND INSTITUTIONAL PROJECTS 25) Describe type of use(s) and mayor function(s) of commercial, industrial or inst~tutronal uses ~1z Cam' ~~- ~til ~u U~IVI ~NC~ ~~o~ 26) Total floor area of commercial, industrial, or institutional uses by type ~ILC~ ~(-/,itil GOJ.I d~hllFKGt~ ~02,~ ~PR-~~. oZ,~~ ~S'~ . ~~ fi,4:~ ~= ~~~~ ~~~r~ ~~?~~Sl~ /,Ui ~r1 ~ULf~G!G ~f'~LU. ~4-f ~20X /.~Oc=~Q • r/~ 27) Indicate hours of operation ~~ ~~ 28) Number of employees Total 2~ Maximum Shift Time of Maximum Shift ! l ff Nr y O 2 ~/t'l I \PLANNINGIFINAL\FORMSICOUNTER\Initial Study Part1 docPage 6 of 10 Rev 3/17/04 F 25 • 29) Provide breakdown ofant~crpated~ob classrficat~ons, including wage and salary ranges, as well as an indication ofthe rate o1 hire for each classification (attach additional sheet if necessary) • ~~~ S G~4-s l-~r ~TZ s G~~~4-rt~~+~ i ~c C~ G,~~u~ 30) Estimation of the number of workers to be hired that currently reside rn the City ~ Q '31) For commercial and industrial uses only, indicate the source, type, and amount of air pol/ut~on emissions (Data should be verified through the South Coast Air Quality Management Distract, at (818) 572-6283) ,x F ~y.~1.F S ~i/z ~ I/v7 ~o~/ ~s,~ ~ ss ions `T ~3 ~ ,~1~ ,4 ~-~,~2 a~ ,~ y ~-. c~ . rel. D . ALL PROJECTS 32) Have the water, sewer, fire, and flood control agencies serving the project been contacted to determine their ability to prowde adequate service to the proposed pro~ect~ If so, please indicate their response ~5~2/~'/ ~Gt' K cS ~/`f~ ,~ /~ /,~lh ~d ~ . Dot! ~ -f' ~~ 33) In the known history of this property, has there been any use, storage, or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic materials ~ Examples of hazardous and/or toxic materials include, but are not limited to PCB's, radioactive substances, pest~crdes and herbicides, fuels, oils, solvents, and otherflammable liquids and gases Also note underground storage of any of the above Please Irst the matena/s and describe their use, storage, and/or discharge on the property, as well as the dates of use, rt known /~/on~~ ~'itl.OCVN • I 1PLANNING(FINAL\FORMS\COUNTER\Initial Study Part1 docPage 7 of 10 Rev 3/17/04 F 26 34) Will the proposed project involve the temporary orlong-term use, storage, or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic matenals, including but not limited to those examples listed above If yes, provide an inventory of all such matenals to be used and proposed method of disposal The location of such uses, along with the storage and shipment areas, shall be shown and labeled on fhe application plans 1 hereby certify that the statements furnished above and rn the attached exhibits present the data and information required for adequate evaluation of this project to the best of my ability, that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct tot he best of my knowledge and belief I further understand that additional i formaf~on may be required to be submitted before an adequate evaluation can be made by the City of Rancho Cucamonga ~~,~/,Q~j ~ ~ Signature ~v ' Date Title ~-~%~C~~~ l~'n/i~ r~/L. I \PLANNING\FINALIFORMS\COUNTER\Initial Study Part1 docPage 8 of 10 Rev 3/17/04 L • F 27 n ~ ~L' OJ _ / ~-l - 1~ 1.1 W Q.ItUct u S (\ I .i r r~ . r~r It;---130 1~ - /~ / C I J ";,ice, II ' ~ rl -_ - I~ ~ i q J L. ~ ~~ 'r~r ~L II - \ W ~-' ~ < p " ~ ~ ~---~~/~ " ~ _ ~~ ~ ~-/ a ii 3775 I( ~'t'~ w ~ -x ~--~ /~- '-~ tir-- m ~ ~ ~-c~ ii u %-/270 ~ / - G Oa ~~'~---"~ ~ ° ~ 4 M g 1- _ ~ _ I , ,F ~ „ ~ . 3 ~ ~--~ U jE~~,2so - Ml~~ ~:~Ve yl , ~ ~ pI`I~TANpi ~~ / / II "l / ado" ~ I- Ij W ~ II r230 12 1 z c u ~2 _ PROJECT SITE '~ -'' ~~ ' II --~"~-` ~~ J ~ 220 =____\___ ~. / ~ ~ ~ II ~ ~ ~ ~m sek ~ ~ '~ ~ II 2 2 - ~_ ~ II O¢ J ~ ~ -e • - BLVD '~~ CORP /zoo II 6\ag I~~n Nom./ /20~ ,{{~ FOOT _ _ N~C:4 N FJ - ~ k I ~ I~. D ~ ",~ ii f/200 UI n /-~~ ~ ~ ~`J' J _ it /~ ~I~ /,/1~/y ~" CI o > 'a ~\ 220 00( u ct~l~ ° C/ ~_~ /"~~ Tan Tr'aiT FEET~a u u ~ i Park _ -`ice ~ II ~ '_--~ r II `~ ~ ~~ 7r .-/ o~ ~ s0 II ~ II . eo --,J ~ / -~/ no 'I f1 ~ " ~ ~ - II ~ I,i ~~ s ~" II -J-~~. w ~ ~ 0 IuI, ---/Y Q ~ Y-13g--~_ ' ~~ ~~ ARROW ROUTE `" " - ;q ,- - ~ o ~-~ a~~ 3773 - - --- ( a 3 ~. " a /15 i a~ o riso w II; o _ ~ o ~I ~ ~ • -~\ W O _ ~ _,. ~ ~I rrso-. a ~ ~ ~ . ~ / 130 ~ ~ Etiwa / .WW TTM7AM ~ I AVE. ~ 1 NTA iFE - - -- ~ '-tJ1i -- -- I C.7 ,`tyC~s~ \ ..4 I Rochester ~ II - I^ _,m~ ~~ ~-~ ~ Water Tank • • P ~ ~ - --- - ~-'- ---- -------~wv.ww Power la - -~ -- ` -~--- -- ------ ---- - -- - - - - D tip. PP-~R ~- _ _ U FEEDER •"• .. ,8 /' °° 3712 - ; o 1\ ~ + it ~ ~o ~- _ = =- ~I ~ EEL P L ~PJJ ~. ~~ II i ; `, oeo II ~ ~~~ '^' ~ I _ \ II '' , I~ -- _ 1 _ 5' ¢ '~II ell ¢ ~ ink I 4~r~1111 II .~ __--_\`- n n 2~~ I I i T \I \ ~~~ \\\// 3 I I ~ I _ ~ J - . x771 ti ;~' ~~-/oso w ~ I~ o ~ry I ~ l II /oso C17CAMONGA CORP BDY ~ ^~ ~ oso " ~ Y ,~-~ SAN BERNAROIN ", I AV o,:00 ~~~: meter-T m ~ \\ D ~ lant a ~ ' ~ G \\ \\ •I vp~~-~ ^ ~ ~ \ ~ III W II ;; b~ F \\ ~ of --- - r „ay r \\ it ~" ~ I{~ ~" SLAG ~ ~©r 11 r~~m~/010 W ~''c; ~ =~-tag'- F n \`~ I ~I ylto"~ DUMP ~\~ Dump E~ o II \~~ (`d Iii/ i I ~~ \\ °~\'~ I'~-- ~~ ~. -". ~ , vi F ~ - o .. ~-----.. . , t 2 ~ I B~ V ... ,~ ry o I~ \o - _-` - - - --- --- - - - - - --- ---- ~IJ ' VP~u~ alser ~ ~ 22 OU ll. ~ ti '~ /DOO ~ it ~~ ~~\~~ I © ~- 2 W A ~ ( FREEWAY - ~\ ~ ~~ _ ~ _ r -~-~-- ~~ l; d o00 o I- 4~ °~ --~ ~ ' I I p ~ ~ I A~'E ~ (Q Of I\`-990 - , .... --- - - ---° V i ~T-- - _~^ ~_ ~ - - - - ~` ~ PAJ/~ C ~ __ /000 ~ _ - - -- s - o o I- 9eo ~~ atset~' e3 975 1. - [ o I 992 ~ ~` - _ __ f T r~U \7~~Y ~ -1 ~ O 1n II +ti= - //,~/~ - _ ~ I ~ _~ il." ~ l ~LN II -~ Ill Page 35 of 47 • CITY OE RANCHO CU~~~IfO~`~r ~ECEIVEI) - PL~A~If~I~40 • 6/17/2006 F 29 i arc .~v vi -r i • • C7 6/17/2006 F 30 Yage 42 of 47 • • • 6/17/2006 F31 rage 4.s of 4 i • • 6/ 17/2006 F 32 Yage 46 of 4 / • • F 33 6/17/2006 ra~C ~~ ui ~i ~__ ~: • ~~~ ~` • 6/ 17/2006 F 34 Yage j~ of 4 / • • F 35 6/17/2006 1Q~'l. JL Vl T/ • • • 6/17/2006 F 36 Yage .SU oI 4 / • • • 6/17/2006 F 37 ra~c ~o ui ~r i • • 6/17/2006 F 38 Page 25 of 47 • • C 6/17/2006 F 39 rd~G G`~F Vl `t / • • • 6/17/2006 F 40 Page 6 of 47 • • F41 6/17/2006 • 6/17/2006 F 42 Yage .i of 4 / • • • 6/17/2006 F 43 r arc i i vl -r i • • :] 6/17/2006 F 44 Page 12 of 47 • • • F 45 6/17/2006 rage i ~ of ~+ i • C c 6/17/2006 F -46 Page 14 of 47 • • • F -47 6/17/2006 rd~'G Y/ Vl `t/ 6/17/2006 F 48 ~~, • "~ Cit of Rancho Cucamon a ~ Y 9 ' ~~ ' ~~ ~ ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM s ~~ INITIAL STUDY PART I I BACKGROUND 1 Protect File CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2006-00580 -Mark Sater - An application to construct two buildings, a 2,900 square foot gas station convenience store with a carwash tunnel and a 1,800 square foot fast food restaurant with adrive-thru, on 1 75 acre of land in the General Industrial District (Subarea 8), located at 12925 Arrow Route (southeast corner of Arrow Route and Etiwanda Avenue) - APN 0229-141-11 and 0229-141-10 2 Description of Protect The applicant building with an off sale beer and wine gasoline dispensers beneath a canopy restaurant building is requesting to develop a gas station convenience store license (Type 20) along with a carwash tunnel and nine The application also includes adrive-thru fast food 3 Protect Sponsor's Name and Address Mark Sater 1875 Rancho Hills Drive Chino Hills, CA 91709 4 General Plan Designation General Industrial District (Subarea 8) 5 Zoning General Industrial District (Subarea 8) 6 Surrounding Land Uses and Setting The subject site is located on the southeast corner of Etiwanda Avenue and Arrow Route A portion of the site is currently occupied by Inland Valley RV, which provides retail sales and the installation of automotive parts The application includes the demolishing of the existing structure on-site to accommodate the new development Although a portion of the site is paved and occupied by Inland Valley RV, the remaining portion of the site has been modified from its original state and undergoes routine landscaping maintenance The project area is developed with industrial, outdoor storage, and residential uses 7 Surrounding Land Uses and Zoning North - Arrow Highway/residential development, Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) South - Industrial/forklift storage area, General Industrial East - Industrial/pipe storage area, General Industrial West - Etiwanda Avenue/shipping container storage, Heavy Industrial 8 Lead Agency Name and Address City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 9 Contact Person and Phone Number Mike Smith, Associate Planner (909) 477-2750 10 Other agencies whose approval is required (e g , permits, financing participation agreement) • San Bernardino County Environmental Health for Underground Storage Tanks • Disclosure for Hazardous Materials Compliance from San Bernardino Department • Uniform Fire Code Implementation Permit for the City of Rancho Cucamonga approval, or County Fire F -49 Initial Study for CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2006-00580 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 2 GLOSSARY -The following abbrev~at~ons are used in this report CVWD -Cucamonga Valley Water District EIR -Environmental Impact Report FEIR -Final Environmental Impact Report NPDES -National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System NOx -Nitrogen Oxides ROG -Reactive Organic Gases PM,o -Fine Particulate Matter RWQCB -Regional Water Quality Control Board SCAQMD -South Coast Air Quality Management District SW PPP -Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan URBEMIS7G -Urban Emissions Model 7G ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact," "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated," or "Less Than-Significant-Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages (X) Aesthetics (X) Agricultural Resources (X) Air Quality OBiological Resources (X) Cultural Resources (X) Geology & Soils (X) Hazards & Waste Materials (X) Hydrology & Water Quality ()Land Use & Planning ()Mineral Resources (X) Noise ()Population & Housing ()Public Services ()Recreation (X) Transportation/Traffic ()Utilities & Service Systems ()Mandatory Findings of Significance DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation (X) I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by, or agreed to, by1the project proponrent A~/M~I/TIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARA`TI N wi i be prepared Prepared By ~(~~Q~µ"L,T ~1~hr/ Y V~1~{ ` `~ Date 1~ ~~ Reviewed By Date 1~ I ~9 I (~"' ~~ F 50 J Initial Study for CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2006-00580 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 3 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources Ph g Potentially Significant With MingaLOn Than Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS 1 AESTHETICS Would the protect a) Have a substantial affect a scenic vistas () () () (/) b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but () () () (/) not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a State Scenic Highway c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or () () () (/) quality of the site and its surroundings d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare, () () (/) ( ) which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area Comments a) There are no significant vistas within or adtacent to the protect site The site is not within a view corridor according to General Plan Exhibit III-15 • b) The protect site contains no scenic resources and no historic buildings within a State Scenic Highway There are no State Scenic Highways within the City of Rancho Cucamonga c) The site is located in an area characterized by industrial, outdoor storage, and medium density residential uses The visual quality of the area will not degrade as a result of this protect Design review is required prior to approval City standards require the developer to underground existing and new utility Imes and facilities to minimize unsightly appearance of overhead utility lines and utility enclosures in accordance with Planning Commission Resolution No 87-96, unless exempted by said Resolution The proposed commercial gas station and fast food restaurant development will be embellished with river rock, decorative columns, tower elements, and lattice canopies d) The protect would increase the number of streetlights and security lighting used in the immediate vicinity The design and placement of light fixtures will be shown on site plans, which require review for consistency with City standards that requires shielding, diffusing, or indirect lighting to avoid glare The lighting will be selected and located to confine the area of illumination to within the protect site The impact is not considered significant 2 AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES Would the project a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or () () (/) ( ) Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural uses b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a () () () (/) Williamson Act contract c) Involve other changes in the existing environment, () () () (/) which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural uses F51 Initial Study for CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2006-00580 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 4 Less Than Signdicant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources hp g Potentially Signdicant wnn Mitigation Than Signrficani No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Comments a) The site is not designated as Prime Farmlands, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance The site is located in an urbanized area There are approximately 1,300 acres of Prime Farmlands, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance within the City of Rancho Cucamonga, of which about one-third is either developed or committed to development according to General Plan Table IV-2 The mayor concentrations of designated farmlands are located in the southern and eastern portions of our City that is characterized by existing and planned development Further, two-thirds of the designated farmlands parcels are small, ranging from 3 acres to 30 acres, and their economic viability is doubtful, therefore, they are not intended to be retained as farmland in the General Plan Land Use Plan The General Pian FEIR identified the conversion of farmlands to urban uses as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated b) There is no agriculturally zoned land within the City of Rancho Cucamonga There are no Williamson Act contracts within the City c) The maJority of the site is vacant and is in an area characterized by industrial, outdoor storage, residential development The nearest agricultural use is more than 3/4 mile northwest from the protect site Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated 3 AIR QUALITY Would the project a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the () () () (/) applicable air quality plan b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute () () (/) ( ) substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of () () (/) ( ) any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-attainment under an applicable Federal or State ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions that exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant () () (/) ( ) concentrations e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial () () () (/) number of people Comments a) As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 6), continued development will contribute to the pollutant levels in the Rancho Cucamonga area, which already exceed Federal and State standards The General Plan FEIR identified the citywide increase in emissions as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated • • F 52 • Initial Study for CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2006-00580 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 5 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources Ph g Potentially Sgnfcant With MdigaUOn Than Signdicant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact b) During the construction phases of development, on-site stationary sources, heavy-duty construction vehicles, construction worker vehicles, and energy use will generate emissions In addition, fugitive dust is associated with grading and construction activities While most of the dust would settle on or near the project site, smaller particles would remain in the atmosphere, increasing particle levels within the surrounding area The contractor will be required to comply with air quality rules and regulations to minimize impacts to air quality The following mitigation measures shall be implemented to reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels 1) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification • 2) Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, the developer shall submit construction plans to the City denoting the proposed schedule and protected equipment use Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low-emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the protect Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Gluality Management District (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning staff 3) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113 Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high-volume, low-pressure spray 4) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCADMD Rule 1108 5) All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403 Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions • • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods • Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices • Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is carried over to adtacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction • Suspend grading operations during high winds (i e , wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with Rule 403 requirements F 53 Initial Study for CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2006-00580 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 6 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP g Potentially Significant With Mitigation Than Signdicant No Im act Incorporated Impact Impact • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means 6) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWG1C6]) daily to reduce Fine Particulate Matter (PMio) emissions, m accordance with SCAGIMD Rule 403 7) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions 8) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel-powered equipment where feasible 9) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use 10) All industrial and commercial facilities shall post signs requiring that trucks shall not be left idling for prolonged periods (i e , in excess of 10 minutes) 11) All industrial and commercial facilities shall designate preferential parking for vanpools 12) All industrial and commercial site tenants with 50 or more employees shall be required to post both bus and Metrolink schedules in conspicuous areas 13) All industrial and commercial site tenants with 50 or more employees shall be required to configure their operating schedules around the Metrolink schedule to the extent reasonably feasible 14) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate high-efficiency/low-polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters 15) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping c) As noted in the General Pian FEIR (Section 5 6), continued development would contribute to the pollutant levels in the Rancho Cucamonga area, which already exceed Federal and State standards The General Plan FEIR identified the citywide increase in emissions as a significant and adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council The project proposed is consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated d) Sensitive receptors are defined as populations that are more susceptible to the effects of pollution than the population at large The SCAQMD identifies the following as sensitive receptors long-term health care facilities, rehabilitation centers, convalescent centers, retirement homes, residences, schools, playgrounds, child care centers, and athletic facilities According to the SCAOMD, protects have the potential to create significant impacts if they are located within 1/4 mile of sensitive receptors and would emit toxic air • • • F 54 Initial Study for CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2006-00580 • City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 7 Less Than Signrficant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources hh g Potentially Significant w~tn Mitigation Than Signdicant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact contaminants identified in SCAQMD Rule 1401 The proposed gas station and fast food restaurant are located within 1/4 mile of a sensitive receptor (existing residential uses are located to the north of Arrow Route) Potential impacts to air quality are consistent with the Public Health and Safety Super-Element within the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan During construction, there is the possibility of fugitive dust to be generated from grading the site The mitigation measures listed under b) above will reduce impact to less-than-significant levels e) Typically, the uses proposed do not create objectionable odors No adverse impacts are anticipated • 4 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES Would the project a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or () () () (/) through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U S Fish and Wildlife Service b) Have a substantial adverse effect on riparian habitat () () () (/) or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally () () () (/) protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native () () () (/) resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances () () () (/) protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat () () () (/) Conservation Plan, Natural Community conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or State habitat conservation plan Comments a) The project site is located in an area developed with industrial, storage, and residential uses The site is currently occupied by Inland Valley RV and has been disturbed by landscaping maintenance According to the General Plan Exhibit IV-3, and Section 5 3 of the General Plan FEIR, the project site is not within an area of sensitive biological resources, therefore, development will not adversely affect rare or endangered species of F 55 Initial Study for CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2006-00580 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 8 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP g Potentially Sgrnficant w~tn Mmgahon Than Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact plants or animals because of the fact that the protect is surrounded by urbanized land uses and is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Plan b) The protect site is located in an urban area with no natural communities No riparian habitat exists on-site, meaning the protect will not have any impacts c) No wetland habitat is present on-site As a result, the implementation of the protect would have no impact on these resources d) The site and the mafority of the surrounding area have been or are being developed, thereby disrupting any wildlife corridors that may have existed No adverse impacts are anticipated e) There are no Heritage trees on the protect site, therefore, the proposed protect is not in conflict with any local ordinance f) The project site is not located within a conservation area according to the General Plan, Open Space and Conservation Plan, Exhibit IV-4 No conflicts with habitat conservation plans will occur 5 CULTURAL RESOURCES Would the project a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the () () () (/) significance of a historical resource as defined in § 15064 5~ b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the () (/) () ( ) significance of an archeological resource pursuant to § 15064 5~ c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological () (/) () ( ) resource or site or unique geologic feature d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred () () () (/) outside of formal cemeteries Comments a) The project site has not been identified as a "Historic Resource" per the standards of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 2 24 (Historic Preservation) There will be no impact b) There are no known archaeological sites or resources recorded on the protect site, however, the Rancho Cucamonga area is known to have been inhabited by Native Americans according to the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 11) Construction activity, particularly grading, soil excavation and compaction, could adversely affect or eliminate existing and potential archaeological resources The following mitigation measures shall be implemented 1) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will • • F 56 • Initial Study for CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2006-00580 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 9 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources Ph g Potentially Sigrnficant With Mtligahon Than Signrficant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact • Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value • Consider establishing provisions to require incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point • Pursue educating the public about the archaeological heritage of the area • Propose mitigation measures and recommend conditions of approval to eliminate adverse protect effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, following appropriate CEQA guidelines • Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the protect area Submit one copy of the completed report with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving • c) The General Plan FEIR (Section 5 11) indicates that the Rancho Cucamonga area is on an alluvial fan According to the San Bernardino County database, no paleontological sites or resources have been recorded within the City of Rancho Cucamonga or the sphere-of-influence, including the protect site, however, the area has a high sensitivity rating for paleontological resources The older alluvium, which would have been deposited during the wetter climate that prevailed 10,000-100,000 years ago during the Late Pleistocene epoch of the Quaternary period, when the last "Ice Age" and the appearance of modern man occurred, may contain significant vertebrate fossils The protect site is underlain by Quaternary alluvium per General Plan Exhibit V-2, therefore, the following mitigation measures shall be implemented 1) If any paleontological resource (i a plant or animal fossils) are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified paleontologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i e , paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures • Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing activities Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find • • Prepare, identify, and curate all recovered fossils for documentation in the summary report and transfer to an appropriate depository (i e , San Bernardino County Museum) F 57 Initial Study for CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2006-00580 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 10 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP g Potentially Signficant w~tn Mitigation Than Signdicant No Impact Incor orated Impact Impact • Submit a summary report to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to San Bernardino County Museum d) The proposed project is in an area that has already been disturbed by development The project site is currently occupied by Inland Valley RV and has been disrupted by landscaping maintenance No known religious or sacred sites exist within the project area No evidence is in place to suggest the project site has been used for human burials The California Health and Safety Code (Section 7050 5) states that if human remains are discovered on-site, no further disturbance shall occur until the County Coroner has made a determination of origin and disposition pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 5097 98 As adherence to State regulations is required for all development, no mitigation is required in the unlikely event human remains are discovered on-site No adverse impacts are anticipated 6 GEOLOGY AND SOILS Would the project a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as () () () (/) delineated on the most recent Aiquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known faulty Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42 ii) Strong seismic ground shakings () () () (/) iii) Seismic-related ground failure, including () () () (/) liquefaction iv) Landslides () () () (/) b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoils () (/) () ( ) c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, () () () (/) or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table () () () (/) 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use () () () (/) of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater Comments a) No known faults pass through the site and it is not in an Earthquake Fault Zone, nor is it in the Rancho Cucamonga City Special Study Zone along the Red Hill Fault, according to the • • • F 58 • Initial Study for CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2006-00580 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 11 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources hh g Potenuatly Signdicant With Mdigallon Than Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact General Plan Exhibit V-1, and Section 5 1 of the General Plan FEIR The Red Hill Fault, passes within 4 miles north of the site, and the Cucamonga Fault Zone lies approximately 7 miles north These faults are both capable of producing MW 6 0-7 0 earthquakes Also, the San Jacinto Fault, capable of producing up to MW 7 5 earthquakes is 10 miles northeasterly of the site and the San Andreas Fault, capable of up to MW 8 2 earthquakes, is 13 miles northeasterly of the site Each of these faults can produce strong groundshaking No impacts are anticipated b) The proposed project will require the excavation, stockpiling, and/or movement of on-site soils The Rancho Cucamonga area is subject to strong Santa Ana wind conditions during September to April, which generates blowing sand and dust, and creates erosion problems Construction activities may temporarily exacerbate the impacts of windblown sand, resulting in temporary problems of dust control, however, development of this project under the General Plan would help to reduce windblown sand impacts in the area as pavement, roads, buildings, arld landscaping are established Therefore, the following fugitive dust mitigation measures shall be implemented to reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels 1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCA(~MD and RWGICB) daily to reduce PM~o emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 • 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM,o emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM,o emissions from the site during such episodes 4) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions c) The General Plan FEIR (Section 5 1) indicates that subsidence is generally associated with large decreases or withdrawals of water from the aquifer The project would not withdraw water from the existing aquifer The site is not within a geotechnical hazardous area or other unstable geologic unit or soil type according to General Plan FEIR Figure 5 1-2 Soil types on-site consist of Tu~unga Gravelly Loamy Sand Soil according to General Plan FEIR Exhibit 5 1-3 No adverse impacts are anticipated d) The majority of Rancho Cucamonga, including the project site, is located on alluvial soil deposits These types of soils are not considered to be expansive Soil types on-site consist of Tulunga Gravelly Loamy Sand Soil according to General Plan Exhibit V-3 and General Plan FEIR Exhibit 5 1-3 These soils are typically highly permeable No adverse impacts are anticipated • e) The project will connect to, and be served by, the existing local sewer system for wastewater disposal No septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal is proposed F 59 Initial Study for CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2006-00580 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 12 Less Than Signficant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources pP g Potentially Significant With Mitigation Than Signdicant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact 7 HAZARDS AND WASTE MATERIALS Would the pro/ect a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the () () (/) ( ) environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the () () (/) ( ) environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or () () () (/) acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within 1/4 mile of an existing or proposed school d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of O O O (/) hazardous materials sites c,onl~,iied pursuant to Government Code Section 65962 5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment e) For a protect located within an airport land use plan or, () () (} (/) where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 rniles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, O O O (/) would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an () () () (/) adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of () () () (/) loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands~ Comments a) The proposed gas station protect will involve the transport, use, and dispensing of gasoline and diesel fuel Arco (the occupant of the gas station) will comply with all applicable regulations for the safe transport and dispensing of gasoline and fuel Therefore, the proposed use will not create a significant hazard to the public through transport, use, and disposal The City participates in a countywide interagency coalition that is considered afull-service Hazardous Materials Division that is more comprehensive that any other in the state The City is in the process of developing an Emergency Operations Plan to meet State and Federal requirements The City has approved a Local Hazard Mitigation Plan which has received State and Federal approvals Compliance with Federal, State, and local regulations concerning the storage and handling of hazardous materials and/or waste will reduce the potential for significant impacts to a level less-than-significant • F 60 :7 Initial Study for CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2006-00580 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 13 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources pp g Potentially Significant With MrtigaUOn Than Sgndicant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact b) The proposed gas station project will involve the transport, use, and dispensing of gasoline and diesel fuel Arco (the occupant of the gas station) will comply with all applicable regulations for the safe transport and dispensing of gasoline and fuel Therefore, the proposed use will not create a significant hazard to the public through accidental conditions involving the release of hazardous materials The City participates m a countywide interagency coalition that is considered a full service Hazardous Materials Division that is more comprehensive than any other in the state The City is in the process of developing an Emergency Operations Plan to meet State and Federal requirements The City has approved a Local Hazard Mitigation Plan which has received State and Federal approvals Compliance with Federal, State, and local regulations concerning the storage and handling of hazardous materials or volatile fuels will reduce the potential for significant impacts to a level less-than-significant c) There are no schools located within 1/4 mile of the project site The project site is located within 1 mile of the nearest existing or proposed school No adverse impacts are anticipated d) The proposed project is not listed as a hazardous waste or substance materials site A recent site inspection did not reveal the presence of discarded drums or illegal dumping of hazardous materials No impact is anticipated • e) The site is not located within an Airport Land Use Plan and is not within 2 miles of a public airport The project site is located approximately 8 miles northerly of the Ontario Airport and is offset north of the flight path No impact is anticipated f) The nearest private airstrip, Cable Airport, is located approximately 2 1/2 miles to the west of the City's westerly limits No impact is anticipated g) The City's Multi-Hazard Disaster Plan, which is updated every two years, includes policies and procedures to be administered by the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District in the event of a disaster Because the project includes at least two points of public street access and is required to comply with all applicable City codes, including local fire ordinances, no adverse impacts are anticipated h) Rancho Cucamonga faces the greatest ongoing threat from awind-driven fire in the Urban Wildland Interface area found in the northern part of the City according to the Fire District Strategic Plan 2000-2005, however, the proposed project site is not located within a high fire hazard area according to General Plan Exhibit V-7 • 8 HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY Would the pro/ect a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements () () (/) ( ) b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere () () () (/) substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e g ,the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted) F61 Initial Study for CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2006-00580 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 14 Less Than Signrficant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources hh g Potentially Signficant w~tn Mitigation Than Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the () () () (/) site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner, which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the () () () (/) site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner, which would result m flooding on- or off-site e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed () () () (/) the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality () () () (/) g) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as () () () (/) mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation maps h) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures () () () (/) that would impede or redirect flood flows i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of () () () (/) loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or damp ~) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow~ () () () (/) Comments a) Water and sewer service is provided by the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD) The project is designed to connect to the existing water and sewer systems The State of California is authorized to administer various aspects of the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit under Section 402 of the Clean Water Act The General Construction Permit treats any construction activity over 1 acre as an industrial activity, requiring a permit under the State's General NPDES permit The State Water Resource Control Board (SWRCB) through the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWOCB), Santa Ana Region, administers these permits Construction activities covered under the State's General Construction permit include removal of vegetation, grading, excavating, or any other activity for new development or significant redevelopment Prior to commencement of construction of a project, a discharger must submit a Notice of Intent (NOI) to obtain coverage under the General Permit The General Permit requires all dischargers to comply with the following during construction activities, including site clearance and grading Develop and implement a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SW PPP) that would specify Best Management Practices (BMPs) that would prevent construction pollutants from contacting storm water and with the intent of keeping all products of erosion from moving off-site into receiving waters • • C~ F 62 • Initial Study for CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2006-00580 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 15 Less Than Sigrnficant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP g Potentially Signdicant With Mdigahon Than Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Eliminate or reduce non-storm water discharges to storm sewer systems and other waters of the nation Perform inspections of all BMPs • Waste discharges include discharges of storm water and construction protect discharges A construction protect for new development or significant redevelopment requires an NPDES permit Construction protect proponents are required to prepare a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) To comply with the NPDES, the protect construction contractor will be required to prepare a SWPPP during construction activities, and a Water Quality Management Plan (WOMP) for post-construction operational management of storm water runoff The applicant has submitted a WOMP, prepared by David R Mellor of C & M Design Concept (February 2, 2007), that identifies BMPs to minimize the amount of pollutants, such as eroded soils, entering the drainage system after construction Runoff from driveways, roads and other impermeable surfaces must be controlled through an on- site drainage system BMPs include both structural and non-structural control methods Structural controls used to manage storm water pollutant levels include detention basins, oil/grit separators, and porous pavement Non-structural controls focus on controlling pollutants at the source, generally through implementing erosion and sediment control plans, and various business plans that must be developed by any businesses that store and use hazardous materials Practices, such as periodic parking lot sweeping can substantially reduce the amount of pollutants entering the storm drain system The following mitigation measures would be required to control additional storm water effluent Construction Activities 1) Prior to issuance of grading permits, the permit applicant shall submit to the Building Official for approval a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical 2) An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included in the grading plan, and implemented for the proposed protect that identifies specific measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading This Erosion Control Plan shall include the following measures at a minimum a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in Southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-site as a result of this protect will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame 3) During construction, temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff C7 4) During construction, to remove pollutants, street cleaning will be performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site F 63 Initial Study for CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2006-00580 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 16 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Sun ortin Information Sources r'p g Potentially Sgndicant w~tn MdigaUOn Than Signdicant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact 5) Applicant shall implement additional Best Management Practices as outlined in the Water Quality Management Plan prepared by David R Mellor of C&M Design Concept on February 2007 6) The irrigation system shall be electronically controlled and set for optimum water timing 7) Food preparation areas shall have all sinks piped with sanitary sewer connections No sinks will be permitted outside of the buildings 8) The vehicle wash tunnel is required to drain to a 1,500 gallon clarifier and grease trap The clarifier discharges to the City sewer and clean water is reclaimed for future wash requirements 9) No outdoor storage 10) The motor fuel-dispensing area shall be concrete The fuel-dispensing surface shall be sloped to prevent drainage flow either through or from the fuel-dispensing area Concrete surfacing extends 6 1/2 feet beyond the corner of each dispenser in any direction 11) All motor fuel concrete dispensing areas are to have a canopy structure overhanging the enure motor fuel concrete dispensing area 12) Catch basins shall be stenciled "No Dumping -Drains to Ocean " 13) Inlet trash racks shall be provided where drainage from open areas enters storm drains 14) Water quality inlets designed to remove free phase liquid petroleum compounds, grease, floatable debris, and settable solids shall be used in relation to the underground catch basin Post- Construction Operational 15) The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in the Water (duality Management Plan (WOMP) prepared by David R Mellor of C & M Design Concept (February 2, 2007) to reduce pollutants after construction entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical 16) Landscaping plans shall include provisions for controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permits b) According to CVWD, 43 percent of the City's water is currently provided from groundwater in the Cucamonga and Chino Basins CVWD has adopted a master plan that estimates demand needs until the year 2030 The proposed protect will not deplete groundwater supplies, nor will it interfere with recharge because it is not within an area designated as a • • • F 64 • Initial Study for CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2006-00580 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 17 Less Than Signrficant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP g Potentially Significant With Mtligation Than Signdicant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact recharge basin or spreading ground according to General Plan Exhibit IV-2 The development of the site will require the grading of the site and excavation, however, would not affect the existing aquifer, estimated to be about 288 to 470 feet below the ground surface As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 9), continued development citywide will increase water needs and is a significant impact, however, CVWD has plans to meet this increased need through the construction of future water facilities c) The protect will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff because of the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on a site, however, the protect will not alter the course of any stream or river All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows The protect design includes landscaping of all non-hardscape areas to prevent erosion A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits Therefore, the protect will not result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site The impact is not considered significant • d) The protect will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff because of the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on a site, however, the protect will not alter the course of any stream or river All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows A grading and drainage plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits Therefore, increase in runoff from the site will not result in flooding on- or off-site No impacts are anticipated e) The protect will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff because of the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on a site, however, all runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows The protect will not result in substantial additional sources of polluted runoff A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits Therefore, increase in runoff from the site will not result in flooding on- or off-site No impacts are anticipated f) Grading activities associated with the construction period could result in a temporary increase in the amount of suspended solids in surface flows during a concurrent storm event, thus resulting in surface water quality impacts The site is for new development or significant redevelopment, therefore, is required to comply with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) to minimize water pollution The following mitigation measures shall be implemented • 17) Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Engineer for approval of a WQMP, including a prolect description and identifying BMPs that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable The WG1MP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga m June 2004 18) Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, the applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National F 65 Initial Study for CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2006-00580 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 18 Less Than Signrficant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources pp g Potentially Significant With Mitigation Than Significant No Impact Incorporated Im act Im act Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board Evidence that this has been obtained (i e , a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Building Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit g) No housing units are proposed with this protect No adverse impacts are expected h) The project site is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Exhibit V-5 No adverse impacts are expected The Rancho Cucamonga area is flood protected by an extensive storm drain system designed to convey a 100-year storm event The system is substantially improved and provides an integrated approach for regional and local drainage flows This existing system includes several debris dams and levees north of the City, spreading grounds, concrete-lined channels, and underground storm drains as shown in General Plan Exhibit V-6 The project site is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Exhibit V-5 No adverse impacts are expected ~) There are no oceans, lakes, or reservoirs near the project site, therefore, impacts from seiche and tsunami are not anticipated The Rancho Cucamonga area sits at the base of the steep eastern San Gabriel Mountains whose deep canyons were cut by mountain streams Numerous man-made controls have been constructed to reduce the mudflow impacts to the level of non-significance within the City This existing system includes several debris dams and levees north of the City, and spreading grounds both within and north of the City 9 LAND USE AND PLANNING Would the project a) Physically divide an established community () () () (/) b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or () () () (/) regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to, a general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan () () () (/) or natural community conservation plan Comments a) The site is located on the southwest corner of Etiwanda Avenue and Arrow Route and is surrounded by industrial, storage, and residential development Since the project will provide services to the existing uses, it is compatible with the established community and will become a part of the larger community No adverse impacts are anticipated b) The protect site land use designation is General Industrial The proposed project is permitted with approval of a Conditional Use Permit It consistent with the General Plan and does not interfere with any policies for environmental protection As such, no impacts are anticipated • • F 66 • Initial Study for CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2006-00580 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 19 Less Than Signifcant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources hh g Potentially Signihcant With Mitigation Than Significant No Im act Incorporated Impact Impact c) The project site is not located within any habitat conservation or natural community plan area According to the General Plan Exhibit IV-3, and Section 5 3 of the General Plan FEIR, the protect site is not within an area of sensitive biological resources, therefore, development will not adversely affect rare or endangered species of plants or animals because of the fact that the protect is surrounded by urbanized land uses and is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Plan 10 MINERAL RESOURCES Would the project a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral () () () (/) resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the State b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally important () () () (/) mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan Comments a) The site is not designated as a State Aggregate Resources Area according to the City General Plan, Figure IV-1 and Table IV-1, therefore, there is no impact • r~ L b) The site is not designated by the General Plan, Figure IV-1 and Table IV-1, as a valuable mineral resource recovery site, therefore, there is no impact 11 NOISE Would the project result in a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in () () () (/) excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive () () () (/) ground borne vibration or ground borne noise levels c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise () () (/) ( ) levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the pro~ect~ d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in () (/) () ( ) ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the pro~ect~ e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, () () () (/) where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, () () () (/) would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels F 67 Initial Study for CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2006-00580 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 20 Less Than Signficant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources hh g Potentially Signihcant w~tn Mitigation Than Significant No Impact Incor orated Impact Impact Comments a) The project site is not within an area of noise levels exceeding City standards according to General Plan Exhibit V-13 at build-out No adverse impact expected b) The uses associated with this type of project normally do not induce ground borne vibrations As such, no impacts are anticipated c) Although the application includes a new carwash tunnel and drive-thru fast food restaurant, they are located in an area that is away from the residential uses to the north In addition, the location of the proposed convenience store building along with Arrow Route will serve to attenuate sound from the carwash and drive-thru uses The primary source of ambient noise levels in Rancho Cucamonga is traffic The proposed activities will not significantly increase traffic, hence are not anticipated to significantly increase the ambient noise levels within the vicinity of the protect d) The General Plan FEIR (Section 5 7) indicates that during a construction phase, on-site stationary sources, heavy-duty construction vehicles, and construction equipment, will generate noise exceeding City standards The following measures are provided to mitigate the short-term noise impacts 1) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday 2) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards speafied in Development Code Section 17 02 120-D, as measured at the property line The developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17 02 120 Monitoring at other times may be required by the Building Official Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building Official within 24 hours, however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building Official If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted The preceding mitigation measures will reduce the disturbance created by on-site construction equipment, however, do not address the potential impacts because of the transport of construction materials and debris The following mitigation measure shall then be required 3) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings e) The site is not located within an Airport Land Use Pian and is not within 2 miles of a public airport The site is located approximately 8 miles northerly of the Ontario Airport and is offset north of the flight path No impact is anticipated • • • F 68 Initial Study for CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2006-00580 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 21 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP g Potentially Significant With Mitigation Than Significant No Impact Incorporated Im act Impact f) The nearest private airstrip, Cable Airport, is located approximately 2 1/2 miles to the west of the City's westerly limits No impact is anticipated 12 POPULATION AND HOUSING Would the pro/ect a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either () () () (/) directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure) b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, () () () (/) necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating () () () (/) the construction of replacement housing elsewhere Comments • a) The protect is located in a predominantly developed area and will not induce population growth The construction activities at the site will be short-term and will not attract new employees to the area Once constructed, the proposed protect will have a limited number of employees, hence will not create a demand for additional housing as a malonty of the employees will likely be hired from within the City or surrounding communities No impacts are anticipated b) The protect site contains no existing housing units No adverse impact expected c) The protect site is not currently utilized for housing No impacts are anticipated 13 PUBLIC SERVICES Would the pro/ect result rn substantral adverse physical rmpacts associated with the provrsron of new or physrcally altered governmental facrlrtres, need for new or physrcally altered governmental facrlrtres, the construction of which could cause significant environmental rmpacts, rn order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance ob/ectrves for any of the public services a) Fire protections () () () (/) b) Police protections () () () (/) c) Schools () () () (/) d) Parks () () () (/) e) Other public facilities O O O (/) Comments a) The site would be served by Fire Station No 173, located approximately 4 miles from the protect site The protect will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities Standard conditions of approval from the Uniform Building and Fire Codes will be placed on the protect so no impacts to fire services will occur No impacts are anticipated F 69 Initial Study for CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2006-00580 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 22 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP g Potentially Significant With Mitigation Than Signifcant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact b) Additional police protection is not required as the addition of the project will not change the pattern of uses within the surrounding area and will not have a substantial increase in property to be patrolled as the protect site is within an area that is regularly patrolled c) The site is in a developed area currently served by the Etiwanda School District and the Chaffey Joint Union High School District The protect will be required to pay school fees as prescribed by State law prior to the issuance of building permits No impacts are anticipated d) The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga The nearest park is located 1/2 mile from the project site The project will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities A standard condition of approval will require the developer to pay park development fees No impacts are anticipated e) The proposed project will utilize existing public facilities The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga The protect will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities Cumulative development within Rancho Cucamonga will increase demand for library services According to the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 9 9), the protected increase in library space under the General Pian will not meet the protected demand The General Plan FEIR identified the cumulative impact on library services as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council The proposed protect is consistent with the General Plan for which the EIR was prepared and impacts evaluated After the adoption of the General Plan, the City built a new library within the Victoria Gardens regional shopping center of approximately 22,000 square feet, which is in excess of the protected need of 15,500 square feet at build-out of the City 14 RECREATION Would the project a) Increase the use of existing neighborhood and () () () (/) regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated b) Does the protect include recreational facilities or () () () (/) require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities, which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment Comments a) The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga The nearest park is located 1/2 mile from the protect site This protect is not proposing any new housing or large employment generator that would cause an increase in the use of parks or other recreational facilities A standard condition of approval will require the developer to pay park development fees No impacts are anticipated b) See a) response above • F 70 • Initial Study for CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2006-00580 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 23 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP g Potentially Signdicam With Mitigation Than Signrficant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact 15 TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC Would the project a) Cause an increase in traffic, which is substantial in () () (/) ( ) relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (i e , result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections) b) Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of () () () (/) service standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including () () () (/) either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature () () () (/) (e g , sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e g ,farm equipment) e) Result m inadequate emergency access () () () (/) f) Result in inadequate parking capacity () () () (/) g) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs () () () (/) supporting alternative transportation (e g , bus turnouts, bicycle racks) Comments a) Implementation of the proposed protect will generate 1829 13 vehicle trips daily The proposed protect includes the development of a service station with a convenience store and a fast food restaurant The Rancho Cucamonga Traffic Model estimates that each pump will generate 133 trips daily and the restaurant will generate 632 13 trips daily As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 5), continued development will contribute to the traffic load in the Rancho Cucamonga area The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated The project is in an area that is mostly developed with street improvements existing or included in project design The protect will not create a substantial increase in the number of vehicle trips, traffic volume, or congestion at intersections The project site will be required to provide street improvements (curb, gutter, and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site per City roadway standards In addition, the City has established a transportation development fee that must be paid by the applicant prior to issuance of building permits Fees are used to fund roadway improvements necessary to support adequate traffic circulation No impacts are anticipated b) The Rancho Cucamonga Traffic Model estimates that each pump will generate 3 63 two-way peak hour trips daily and the restaurant will generate 33 26 two-way peak hour trips daily In November 2004, San Bernardino County voters passed the Measure I extension which requires local jurisdictions to impose appropriate fees on development for their fair share toward regional transportation improvement projects On May 18, 2005, the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted a Comprehensive Transportation Fee Schedule updating these development impact fees As a result, the San Bernardino County Congestion Management Agency waived the Congestion Management Plan (CMP) Traffic F71 Initial Study for CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2006-00580 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 24 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources Ph g Potentially Signficant With Mdigation Than Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Impact Analysis reporting requirement This protect will be required, as a condition of approval, to pay the adopted transportation development fee prior to issuance of building permit The protect is in an area that is mostly developed with all street improvements existing The project will not negatively impact the level of service standards on adjacent arterials The project will be required to provide street improvements (curb, gutter, and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site No impacts are anticipated c) Located approximately 8 miles northerly of the Ontario Airport, the site is offset north of the flight path and will not change air traffic patterns No impacts are anticipated d) The project is in an area that is mostly developed The project will be required to provide street improvements (curb, gutter, and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site The protect design does not include any sharp curves or dangerous intersections or farming uses The protect architect has designed the project with egress/ingress locations away from the intersection of Etiwanda Avenue and Arrow Route to prevent turning impacts to the intersection The protect will, therefore, not create a substantial increase in hazards because of a design feature No impacts are anticipated e) The project will be designed to provide access for all emergency vehicles and will, therefore, not create an inadequate emergency access No impacts are anticipated f) The protect design has adequate parking in compliance with standards of the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code and will, therefore, not create an inadequate parking capacity No impacts are anticipated g) The applicant will be required to construct a bus shelter along the project site, which would permit employees to utilize public transportation, which will support transportation and vehicle trip reduction 16 UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS Would the project a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the () () () (/) applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board's b) Require or result in the construction of new water or () () () (/) wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects c) Require or result in the construction of new storm () () () (/) water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects ~ d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the () () () (/) project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment () () () (/) provider, which serves or may serve the project, that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments • • • F 72 C Initial Study for CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2006-00580 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 25 Less Than Signdicant Less Issues and Su Ortln Information Sources pp g Potentially Signdicant With Mdigation Than Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted () () () (/) capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs g) Comply with Federal, State, and local statutes and () () () (/) regulations related to solid waste Comments a) The proposed project is served by the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD) sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga The project is required to meet the requirements of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board regarding wastewater No impacts are anticipated b) The proposed protect is served by the CVWD sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga and RP-1 located within City of Ontario, neither of which is at capacity The project is required to meet the requirements of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board regarding wastewater No impacts are anticipated • c) All runoff will be conveyed to the existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits The impact is not considered significant d) The project is served by the CVWD water system There is currently a sufficient water supply available to the City of Rancho Cucamonga to serve this project No impacts are anticipated e) The proposed project is served by the CVWD sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga and RP-1 located within City of Ontario, neither of which are at capacity No impacts are anticipated f) Solid waste disposal will be provided by the current City contracted hauler who disposes the refuse at a permitted landfill with sufficient capacity to handle the City's solid waste disposal needs g) This project complies with Federal, State, and local statutes and regulations regarding solid waste The City of Rancho Cucamonga continues to implement waste reduction procedures consistent with AB 939 Therefore, no impacts are anticipated • F 73 Initial Study for CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2006-00580 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 26 Less Than Signrficant Less Issues and Su Ortln Information Sources hh g Potentially Sgnihcant With MitigaAOn Than Signdicant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact 17 MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the () () () (/) quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the mayor periods of California history or prehistory b) Does the project have impacts that are individually () () () (/) limited, but cumulatively considerable ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a protect are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future pro~ects)~ c) Does the project have environmental effects that will () () () (/) cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly Comments a) The site is not located in an area of sensitive biological resources as identified on the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Exhibit IV-3 Additionally, the area surrounding the site is developed Based on previous development and street improvements, it is unlikely that any endangered or rare species would inhabit the site b) If the proposed project were approved, then the applicant would be required to develop the site in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan The 2001 General Plan was adopted along with the certification of a Program FEIR, Findings of Fact, and a Statement of Overriding Considerations for significant adverse environmental effects of build-out in the City and Sphere-of-Influence The City made findings that adoption of the General Plan would result in significant adverse effects to aggregate resources, prime farmland, air quality, the acoustical environment, library services, and aesthetics and visual resources Mitigation measures were adopted for each of these resources c) Development of the site under the proposed land use change would not cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly The Initial Study identifies construction-related emissions of criteria pollutants as having a potentially significant impact Proposed mitigation measures would further reduce emission levels Additionally, impacts resulting from air quality would be short-term and would cease once construction activities were completed The Initial Study identified potentially significant impacts associated with the exposure of people to increased noise levels Mitigation measures contained in this Initial Study will ensure impacts are at less-than-significant levels • • • F 74 Initial Study for DRC2006-00580 -MARK SATER City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 27 EARLIER ANALYSES/TECHNICAL STUDIES Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or Negative Declaration per Section 15063(c)(3)(D) The effects identified above for this protect were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in the following earlier document(s) pursuant to applicable legal standards, and such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis The following earlier analyses were utilized in completing this Initial Study and are available for review in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division offices, 10500 Civic Center Drive (check all that apply) (/) General Plan FEIR (SCH#2000061027, Certified October 17, 2001) (/) Water Quality Management Plan (WOMP) (David R Mellor of C & M Design Concept, February 2, 2007) (/) Master Environmental Assessment (/) Industrial Area Specific Plan • • F 75 Dec 06 2007 1:43PM HP LRSERJET FR7~ Dec 06 07 01 p Alex p Cuevas 626-792-0858 p 1 I I Study for fl .loos-ooSBO - PAgRK gg7Ef~ CRy of Rancho Cucamonga °age 28 A , LICANT CERI'7plCATION i 1 tcfy That I am the appNCant for the prole~ct described in this Initial Sixady I acknovvtedgg that I have r this inrtia! Study and the prcpoaed mitigatlcn rnoa<$ures, Further, I have r&+nsed the protect plans or p ale and/or hereby agree to the proposed rn(tiga~an measures to avoid the effects or rni~ate the is to a point where clearly no sipnif~c~t ectvronmemal effects would occur _.-- ,ican"s Signature Date _ ~ 7i _ J .Zj ~-- Ar Name andlltle !' /.~J'f,/,~C' C_ ~.~ hJf re .. _ _ p.l • • • F-76 City of Rancho Cucamonga ~~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION _- .~.... '~. I'~.J 1~ ~-_ The following Mrtrgated Negative Declarat-on rs being circulated for publ-c review rn accordance with the Californ-a Environmental Quality Act Section 21091 and 21092 of the Publ-c Resources Code Project File No Conditional Use Permit DRC2006-00580 Public Review Period Closes December 12, 2007 Project Name Project Applicant Mark Sater Project Location (also see attached map) Located at 12925 Arrow Route (southeast corner of Arrow Route and Etiwanda Avenue - APN 0229-141-11 and 0229-141-10 Protect Description An application to construct two buildings, a 2,900 square foot gas station convenience store with a carwash tunnel and a 1,800 square foot fast f~~d restaurant with a drive-thru, on 1 75 acre of land in the General Industrial District (Subarea 8) FINDING This is to advise that the City of Rancho Cucamonga, acting as the lead agency, has conducted an Initial Study to determine if the protect may have a significant effect on the environment and ~s • proposing this Mitigated Negative Declaration based upon the following finding The Initial Study identified potentially significant effects but (1) Revisions in the protect plans or proposals made or agreed to by the applicant before this proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration was released for public review would avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant effects would occur, and (2) There is no substantial evidence before the agency that the protect, as revised, may have a significant effect on the environment If adopted, the Mitigated Negative Declaration means that an Environmental Impact Report will not be required The factual and analytical basis for this finding is included en the attached Initial Study The protect file and all related documents are available for review at the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department at 10500 Civic Center Drive (909) 477-2750 or Fax (909) 477-2847 NOTICE The public is invited to comment on the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration during the review period December 12, 2007 Date of Determination Adopted By F 77 RESOLUTION NO 07-74 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2006-00580 - A REQUEST TO CONSTRUCT A COMMERCIAL CENTER CONSISTING OF AN AUTO SERVICE COURT (2,900 SQUARE FOOT GAS STATION WITH CONVENIENCE STORE AND CARWASH) AND A FAST FOOD RESTAURANT OF 1,800 SQUARE FEET ON 2 07 ACRES OF LAND IN THE GENERAL INDUSTRIAL (GI) DISTRICT, SUBAREA 8, LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF ARROW ROUTE AND ETIWANDA AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN 0229-141-10 and -11 A Recitals 1 Mark Sater filed an application for the issuance of Conditional Use Permit DRC2006-00580, as described m the title of this Resolution Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subJect Conditional Use Permit request is referred to as "the application " 2 On the 12th day of December 2007, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on said application and concluded said hearing on that date 3 All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred B Resolution • NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows 1 This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth m the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on December 12, 2007, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows a The application applies to two parcels of land located at the southeast corner of Arrow Route and Etiwanda Avenue, with a combined area of about 90,663 square feet (2 07 acres) and a street frontage along Etiwanda Avenue of about 300 feet and a street frontage along Arrow Route of about 300 feet, and b Apart of the project site is developed with a building of about 11,000 square feet located on the south parcel of the project site The remainder of the project site is vacant, and c To the north of the subject site, is the Victoria Woods apartment complex, to the south is a vehicle and materials storage yard and office, to the east it is vacant, and to the west is the storage yard for Ameron, Inc , a concrete pipe manufacturer, and d The zoning of the properties to the north is Medium (M) Residential The zoning of the properties to the south and east is General industrial (GI) District, Subarea 8 The zoning of the properties to the west is Heavy Industrial (HI) District, Subarea 15, and F 78 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 07-74 DRC2006-00580 -MARK SATER December 12, 2007 Page 2 • e The applicant proposes to construct a 2,900 square foot convenience store with a gas station canopy and a mechanized car wash on the north parcel, while on the south parcel the applicant proposes to demolish the existing structure and replace it with a 1,800 square foot fast food restaurant with adrive-thru, and f The convenience store, gas station, and carwash will be operated by ARCO The store and gas station will operate 24 hours everyday while the carwash will operate between 7 00 a m and 8 00 p m everyday No automotive repair or storage is proposed with this use, g The fast food restaurant is undetermined at this time with no tenant specified, h The project requires 43 parking stalls, with 43 provided 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows a The proposed development is m accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the district m which the site is located The proposed project is to construct a convenience store, gas station, car wash, and fast food restaurant These uses are permitted with a Conditional Use Permit in the General Industrial (GI) District, Subarea 8 The underlying General Plan designation is General Industnai b The proposed development, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not • be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially in~unous to properties or improvements in the vicinity The proposed land use is consistent with the existing land use and the expectations of the community The property to the north is zoned residential with habitable structures about 250 feet from the nearest proposed structure (the gas station canopy) The surrounding properties to the, south, east, and west are zoned industrial Any noise-related impacts caused by the uses on the site will be minimized by the fact that the car wash is located on the south side of the convenience store and will only operate between 7 00 a m and 8 00 p m Also, the fast food restaurant drive thru speaker box will be at the south side of the site The site itself will be further screened by extensive landscaping and earthen berms along both Etiwanda Avenue and Arrow Route c The proposed development complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code The proposed development meets all standards outlined in the Development Code and the design and development standards and policies of the Planning Commission and the City 4 Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows a Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA")and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the F 79 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 07-74 DRC2006-00580 -MARK SATER December 12, 2007 • Page 3 imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared Thereafter, City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration b The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it, finds (i) that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA, and (u) that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment The Planning Commission further finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission Based on these findings, the Planning Commission hereby adopts the Mitigated Negative Declaration c The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081 6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation The Planning Commission therefore adopts the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project d The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring Program, and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings • upon which the Planning Commission's decision is based is the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 477-2750 5 Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference Planning Department 1) Approval is for the construction and operation of a convenience store, gas station, car wash, and fast food restaurant in the General Industrial (GI) District, Subarea 8, located at the southeast corner ofArrow Route and Etiwanda Avenue - APN 0229-141-10 and -11 2) The convenience store and gas station are permitted to operate 24 hours a day everyday The hours of operation for the car wash shall be limited to between 7 00 a m to 8 00 p m everyday 3) The fast food restaurant shall operate between 8 00 a m and 10 00 p m Sunday through Thursday, and 8 00 a m and 11 00 p m Friday and Saturday Revisions to the hours of operation are subject to the review of a Conditional Use Permit and approval by the Planning Director F 80 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 07-74 DRC2006-00580 -MARK SATER December 12, 2007 Page 4 4) The storage of materials, equipment, and waste shall be within the buildings The repair and/or storage of vehicles on-site shall not be permitted 5) The approved uses shall operate m conformance with the performance standards as defined in the Development Code including, but not limited to, noise levels If the operation of the businesses causes adverse effects upon the neighboring properties, the Conditional Use Permit may be reviewed by the Planning Commission/Planning Director for consideration and modification of the use 6) Any modification or intensification of the uses, including a change in operating hours, addition or relocation of equipment or the addition of services, shall require review and approval by the Planning Commission/Planning Director 7) Shared access, parking, and maintenance shall be incorporated in the project Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) 8) Downspouts shall not be visible from the exterior on any elevations of the buildings All downspouts shall be routed through the interior of the building walls 9) All walls, including retaining walls, visible to the public shall be • decorative masonry Decorative means slump stone, split-face, or stucco 10) The trash enclosure shall be surrounded with dense shrub plantings 11) Ali ground-mounted equipment such as fire detector checks, backflow devices, and electricity transformers shall be screened with 2 rows of 5-gallon shrubs spaced a minimum of 18 inches on center Ail devices shall be painted dark green or equivalent 12) All overhead trellises shall have cross members spaced no more than 18 inches on center with minimum dimensions of 4 inches by 12 inches The beams of ail overhead trellises shall have the same detail cuts and finishes 13) Provide trim moldings or similar embellishments around all windows and doors The trim molding shall be painted to match the color of the parapet cornice 14) One-way vision glass shall be used on the windows at the carwash 15) All trellises shall be painted to match the color of the parapet cornice 16) The trim that 'caps' the river rock veneer on all structures shall be • constructed of concrete for durability F81 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 07-74 DRC2006-00580 -MARK SATER December 12, 2007 Page 5 17) The undulating berms along the street frontages within the landscape setback and landscape areas shall have a maximum height of at least 3 feet 18) The landscaping along the street frontages and the northwest corner of the site shall be enhanced as specified by the Design Review Committee including an increased variety and quantity of plants and trees 19) The landscaping shall be installed prior to the release of the buildings for occupancy 20) Add climbing vines along the perimeter wrought iron fencing 21) The Uniform Sign Program is conceptually approved The applicant shall submit a formal application and fee for review and approval by the Planning Director prior to the submittal of any applications for sign permits All signs shall require review and approval of a Sign Permit application by the Planning Director prior to installation Engineering Department • 1) Etiwanda Avenue frontage improvements to be in accordance with City "Mayor Arterial" street Standards, with a 72-foot "mid-block" pavement width and 100-foot right-of-way a) Additional widening is required at the intersection to accommodate dual left-turn lanes and right-turn lanes (northbound) Install, relocate, or otherwise provide all frontage public improvements including the intersection, curb return, relocate traffic signal as required, street pavement to centerline of street, traffic signing and striping, curb and gutter, etc , northbound leg as follows East side curb alignment at intersection shall be placed 48 feet from centerline of Etiwanda Avenue Widening for northbound Etiwanda at intersection to include installation of dual left-turn lanes (one left-turn lane west of centerline) Northbound lanes, 2 to10 feet left, 2 to 11 feet through, and a 16-foot wide right-turn lane b) Provide a 4-foot wide property line adjacent sidewalk on Etiwanda Avenue c) Provide street trees on Etiwanda Avenue in accordance with the Street Tree Requirement Form d) Provide drive approach in accordance with City Standard No 101, Type "C" Near edge of driveway on Etiwanda Avenue F 82 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 07-74 DRC2006-00580 -MARK SATER December 12, 2007 Page 6 shall be a minimum of 200 feet south of the point of curb return at Arrow Route e) Provide one (1) 16,000 Lumen HPSV street light f) Provide traffic signing and striping and protect existing traffic signs including R-26(s) and other signs or replace as required 2) The driveway on Arrow Route shall align with the existing dnveway for the condominiums on the north side of the street Any off set of dnveway alignment with the dnveway on the north side of the street will create left-turn conflicts which are not acceptable Obtain off-site shared access easement from the adjacent property owner to construct the driveway m direct alignment with the north side driveway 3) Bus shelter shall be located outside the Public right-of-way, contact the Planning Department for its design and maintenance requirements Also, contact Omni Trans for additional bus shelter and bus bench design requirements 4) Provide shared access easement over Etiwanda Avenue driveway in favor of the property to the south 5) Arrow Route frontage improvements to be in accordance with City "Mayor Arterial" and Special Boulevard standards, with a 72-foot pavement width and 100-foot right-of-way and including, but not limited to, the following a) Additional widening is required at intersections to accommodate a bus bay/right-turn lane (eastbound) Provide dual left-turn lanes westbound at Etiwanda Avenue approximately 210 feet long Each 12 feet wide and one divided equally across the street centerline (6 feet north side and 6 feet south side) Provide cleft-turn lane to serve the Arrow Route main ingress/egress and for the apartment complex across the street Provide a combined bus bay/right-turn lane at the southeast corner of Arrow Route/Etiwanda Avenue m accordance with City Standard 119 Start the transition as close to the intersection ECR as possible b) Provide curb and gutter, street trees, and remove and replace asphalt pavement to centerline of street c) Provide a 4-foot wide curvilinear sidewalk with a 6-foot wide curb adjacent sidewalk along the bus bay portion • • F 83 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 07-74 DRC2006-00580 -MARK SATER December 12, 2007 Page 7 d) Provide two (2) 16,000 Lumen HPSV street lights, as required 6) Protect all traffic signal equipment Relocate, adjust to grade or replace as required 7) Dedication on Etiwanda Avenue shall be made for the rights-of-way (measured from street centerline) a) 60 total feet on Etiwanda Avenue b) Sidewalks shall cross drive approaches at the zero curb face If needed, provide sidewalk easements to accomplish this 8) Dedication on Arrow Route shall be made for the rights-of-way (measured from street centerline) a) 50 total feet on Arrow Route b) Provide at least 7 feet of right-of-way, measured from curb face, along the bus bay/right-turn lane m accordance with City Standard Plan No 119 • c) Additional dedication may be needed for dual left-turn at intersection and left-turn lane mid-block d) Sidewalks shall cross drive approaches at the zero curb face Provide easements as needed for public sidewalk to meander and cross drive approaches 9) The corner property line cutoffs shall be dedicated per City Standards 10) Complete a lot merger to combine the two separate parcels into one, prior to obtaining a building permit 11) Development is within area 10 or 11 of the attached Etiwanda/San Savaine Drainage Policy Developments of less than 5 acres will not be required to construct the storm drain facilities specified for area 10 developments Area 10 developments of less than 5 acres and area 11 developments will, however, show that they are protected from possible flooding and if necessary, construct any and ail local, interim and ultimate facilities needed to protect itself Also, pay the Etiwanda/San Sevaine Master Plan Drainage Fee(s) • 12) Provide a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), to the satisfaction of the City Engineer, and identify applicable Best Management Practices (BMPs) on the grading plan a) Maintenance of BMPs identified in the WQMP shall be addressed in the project CC&Rs F 84 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 07-74 DRC2006-00580 -MARK SATER December 12, 2007 Page 8 13) Provide a clear "Line-of-Sight" design for all project driveways, on the grading and landscape plans m accordance with City policy 14) All street parkways shall slope at 2 percent from top-of-curb to 1 foot beyond the sidewalk along all street frontages 15) Provide a final drainage report that addresses the following a) Regional Mainline Channel improvements by the San Bernardino County Flood Control District are planned, including the combined Etiwanda/San Sevaine area shown on page 6 of the attached "Etiwanda/San Sevaine Area Drainage Policy " However, the improvements may not be completed until 2008 If development of this site occurs prior to completion of the channel improvements, both on-site and frontage street improvements will have to be designed for an interim condition which includes a possible 100-year storm m Arrow Route and the existing floodway to the east property • b) Development must prove that, in the interim condition, it will be protected from upstream flows and proposed improvements will not affect adtacent properties by altering the base flood elevation . c) For the ultimate condition, it will be necessary to demonstrate how flows from the site will be conveyed to Master Plan System 10 or 11 (see page 13 of Etiwanda/San Sevaine Area Drainage Policy) This system involves replacing the existing unimproved channel to the east of this property with a storm drain that has laterals in Arrow Route, street, and drainage improvements shall be designed accordingly d) The Grading Plan suggests that the site is draining to Etiwanda Avenue which serves Area 11 Determine whether additional developed flows can be accommodated by Area 11 facilities e) Determine the downstream impacts of developing this site in the ultimate condition Indicate where local storm drains will be needed per the following criteria Local drainage facilities (to convey at least 025) are required whenever the 010 water surface fails to leave a 10-foot wide dry lane m the center of a Local or Collector street or a 20-foot dry lane on Arrow Route The Q25 water surface shall not exceed the top-of-curb (050 in sump conditions) and the 0100 water surface shall not exceed the right-of-way on any street Discuss whether off-site street improvements are needed to contain ultimate 0100 on Arrow Route or Etiwanda Avenue F 85 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 07-74 DRC2006-00580 -MARK SATER December 12, 2007 . Page 9 Environmental Mitigation Air Quality 1) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers'specifications Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification 2) Prior to the issuance of any Grading Permits, developer shall submit construction plans to City denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the project The contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning Staff 3) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113 Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high-volume, low-pressure spray • 4) III asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108 5) All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403 Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods • Drspose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices • Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is carried over to adfacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction • Suspend grading operations during high winds (i e ,wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with Rule 403 requirements F 86 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 07-74 DRC2006-00580 -MARK SATER December 12, 2007 Page 10 Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means 6) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWQCBJ) dailyto reduce Fine Particulate Matter (PM,o) emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 7) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions 8) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel-powered equipment where feasible 9) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use • 10) All industrial and commercial facilities shall post signs requiring that trucks shall not be left idling for prolonged periods (i e , in excess of 10 minutes) 11) All industrial and commercial facilities shall designate preferential • parking for vanpools 12) All industrial and commercial site tenants with 50 or more employees shall be required to post both bus and Metrolink schedules in conspicuous areas 13) All industrial and commercial site tenants with 50 or more employees shall be required to configure their operating schedules around the Metrolink schedule to the extent reasonably feasible 14) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate high-efficiency/low-polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters 15) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping Cultural Resources 1) if any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will F 87 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 07-74 DRC2006-00580 -MARK SATER December 12, 2007 Page 11 • Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value • Consider establishing provisions to require incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point • Pursue educating the public about the area's archaeological heritage • Propose mitigation measures and recommend conditions of approval to eliminate adverse project effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, following appropriate CEQA guidelines • Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the project area Submit one copy of the completed report with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving • 2) If any paleontological resource (i e plant or animal fossils) are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified paleontologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i e , paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures • Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing activities • Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage if construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find • Prepare, identify, and curate all recovered fossils for documentation in the summary report and transfer to an appropriate depository (i e ,San Bernardino County Museum) • Submit summary report to City of Rancho Cucamonga Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to San Bernardino County Museum F 88 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 07-74 DRC2006-00580 -MARK SATER December 12, 2007 Page 12 • Geology and Soils 1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PM,o emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 or re-planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM,o emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM,o emissions from the site during such episodes 4) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions Hydrology and IWater Quality 1) Prior to issuance of Grading Permits, the permit applicant shall submit • to Building Official for approval, Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SW PPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical 2) An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included in grading plan, and implemented for the proposed project that identifies specific measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading This Erosion Control Plan shall include the following measures at a minimum a) Speafy the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-site as a result of this project will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame 3) During construction, temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff 4) During construction, to remove pollutants, street cleaning will be performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site F 89 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 07-74 DRC2006-00580 -MARK SATER December 12, 2007 Page 13 5) Applicant shall implement additional Best Management Practices as outlined in the Water Quality Management Plan prepared by David R Mellor of C&M Design Concept on February 2007 6) The irrigation system shall be electronically controlled and set for optimum water timing 7) Food preparation areas shall have all sinks piped with sanitary sewer connections No sinks will be permitted outside of the buildings 8) The vehicle wash tunnel is required to drain to a 1,500 gallon clarifier and grease trap The clarifier discharges to the City sewer and clean water is reclaimed for future wash requirements 9) No outdoor storage 10) The motor fuel-dispensing area shall be concrete The fuel-dispensing surface shall be sloped to prevent drainage flow either through or from the fuel-dispensing area Concrete surfacing extends 6 1/2 feet beyond the corner of each dispenser in any direction 11) All motor fuel concrete dispensing areas are to have a canopy structure overhanging the entire motor fuel concrete dispensing area 12) Catch basins shall be stenciled "No Dumping -Drains to Ocean " 13) Inlet trash racks shall be provided where drainage from open areas enters storm drains 14) Water quality inlets designed to remove free phase liquid petroleum compounds, grease, floatable debris, and settable solids shall be used in relation to the underground catch basin Post-Construction Operational 15) The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in the Water Quality Management Plan prepared by David R Mellor of C&M Design Concept on February 2007, to reduce pollutants after construction entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical 16) Landscaping plans shall include provisions for controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of Grading Permits 17) Prior to issuance of Building Permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Engineer for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), including a project description and identifying Best F 90 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 07-74 DRC2006-00580 -MARK SATER December 12, 2007 Page 14 Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable The WOMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004 18) Prior to issuance of Grading or Paving Permits, applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board Evidence that this has been obtained (i e , a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Building Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit Noise 1) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday 2) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17 02 120-D, as measured at the property line Developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17 02 120 Monitoring at other times may be required by the Building Official Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building Official within 24 hours, however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building Official If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted 3) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings • F91 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 07-74 DRC2006-00580 -MARK SATER December 12, 2007 • Page 15 6 The Secretary to this Commission shall certify the adoption of this Resolution APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 12TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2007 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY Pam Stewart, Chairman ATTEST James R Troyer, AICP, Secretary I, James R Troyer, AICP, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 12th day of December 2007, by the following vote-to-wit AYES COMMISSIONERS NOES COMMISSIONERS ABSENT COMMISSIONERS F 92 • City of Rancho Cucamonga MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM Project File No DRC2006-00580 This Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP) has been prepared for use in implementing the mitigation measures identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration fortheabove-listed project This program has been prepared in compliance with State law to ensure that adopted mitigation measures are implemented (Section 21081 6 of the Public Resources Code) Program Components -This MMP contains the following elements 1 Conditions of approval that act as impact mitigation measures are recorded with the action and the procedure necessary to ensure compliance The mitigation measure conditions of approval are contained in the adopted Resolution of Approval for the project 2 A procedure of compliance and verification has been outlined for each action necessary This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported • 3 The MMP has been designed to provide focused, yet flexible guidelines As monitoring progresses, changes to compliance procedures may be necessary based upon recommendations by those responsible for the program Program Management -The MMP will be in place through all phases of the project The project planner, assigned by the City Planner, shall coordinate enforcement of the MMP The project planner oversees the MMP and reviews the Reporting Forms to ensure they are filled out correctly and proper action is taken on each mitigation Each City department shall ensure compliance of the conditions (mitigation) that relate to that department Procedures -The following steps will be followed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga 1 A fee covering all costs and expenses, including any consultants' fees, incurred by the City in performing monitoring or reporting programs shall be charged to the applicant 2 A MMP Reporting Form will be prepared for each potentially significant impact and its corresponding mitigation measure identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Checklist, attached hereto This procedure designates who will take action, what action will betaken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported All monitoring and reporting documentation will be kept in the project file with the department having the original authority for processing the project Reports will be available from the City upon request at the following address City of Rancho Cucamonga -Lead Agency Planning Department 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 F 93 Mitigation Monitoring Program DRC2006-00580 -Mark Sater Page 2 3 Appropriate specialists will be retained if technical expertise beyond the City staff's is needed, as determined by the project planner or responsible City department, to monitor specific mitigation activities and provide appropriate written approvals to the project planner 4 The pro}ect planner or responsible City department will approve, by signature and date, the completion of each action item that was identified on the MMP Reporting Form After each measure is verified for compliance, no further action is required for the specific phase of development 5 All MMP Reporting Forms for an impact issue requiring no further monitoring will be signed off as completed by the pro}ect planner or responsible City department at the bottom of the MMP Reporting Form 6 Unanticipated circumstances may arise requiring the refinement or addition of mitigation measures The pro}ect planner is responsible for approving any such refinements or additions An MMP Reporting Form will be completed by the project planner or responsible City department and a copy provided to the appropriate design, construction, or operational personnel • 7 The pro}ect planner or responsible City department has the authority to stop the work of construction contractors if compliance with any aspects of the MMP is not occurring after written notification has been issued The project planner or responsible City department also has the authority to hold certificates of occupancies if compliance with a mitigation measure attached hereto is not occurring The pro}ect planner or responsible City department has the authority to • hold issuance of a business license until all mitigation measures are implemented 8 Any conditions (mitigation) that require monitoring after pro}ect completion shall be the responsibility of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division The Division shall require the applicant to post any necessary funds (or other forms of guarantee) with the City These funds shall be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measure for the required period of time 9 In those instances requiring long-term pro}ect monitoring, the applicant shall provide the City with a plan for monitoring the mitigation activities at the pro}ect site and reporting the monitoring results to the City Said plan shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented The monitoring/reporting plan shall conform to the City's MMP and shall be approved by the Community Development Director or City Planner prior to the issuance of building permits F 94 • • • M~/~~ LV a F J H Z c _~ J Y W U C~ Z_ O Z 0 0 Q ~_ L ~ ~ o N N Y ~ L T L Q~ ~ ; v Z a , 0 L N ~ U v ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ a~ ~ ~I ~ ~F+ ~ ~ ~ C O U Q O L z a ~ ~ _ ~ LL ~~,, V ~ ~ O L a N N N N N N • • k a U a a a a ~ N c ~ c ~ c (n c ~ c ~ c Cis c0 ca N Cis Its ~ Q ~ a ~ a • 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 ~ ~ a a i a i ~ ~ i U U U m U U • O m • ~ a a m m m ~ ~ ~ o U ~ ~ O C o 0 0~ o~ ~ .~ O ~ ~ U c ll -° U~ c O ~ ~ 'O O - ~ y C2 ~ ~ ~ E a- 7 p L- ( _N L O ~ U ~ O U O O O C~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ,~ O C O Q- ~ ~~ ° O ~ U ~ _ U CO (n _ i U ~ Q (n ~ ~ ° 3 L U _~ C U ~ 'D O C I~ O~ C c 0 O CSS (~ i "C ~ >' (~ C a O~ «. N C O Cn _ (ll ~ ~ O ('~ ~ ~ E ~ C ?' O C ~ ~ °~~.~ c ~ ~ `~ m -~ m o - ~ ~ N i C C ~ a i ~ >, 7~ ~ `p ~~ 0~ a L C a~ O_ ~ U Cts -_ C ~ c O O C c O O O ~ fn (1) U U C ~ U c - O Cn U' CO In N C O (ll "- Q y cis ~ (ll (ll ~ N 00 c~ ~ L OC ~ ~ O ~~` U (ll C O ~ O p~ O~ U O -O U U Cn N p~ O O - X O - ~ ~ C ~ c0 L p .~ ~ a~ o ~ a~... ~ U N O _ ° i E i C ~ ~ c CU . Q> a~ O U -o o ° Q~ Q ~ ~ oin °' ~~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ° ~ Q a ~ cco • ~ o~~ o ~ o ~ a m ~ ~ ~ ~ c ~ ~ cts ~ - c n ~ aU ~ -o c° o O w- ~ -p o .. ~ ~ -~ ~`r ~ ~ ~~ ~ C O ~ ~ _ I~ O CIS - C O i? .~ N CIS > ~ N p ~ Cd ~ o ~ C = ~ m cn N _ ~ U Cn U > U ~ c~ ' -O ~ C ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O N U Qj ' ~ Q U U cts O j _ Cn ~ ~ >+ ~ c ~ Cn ~ ~ C O C fl) ~ ~ N _ Cn O O fT Cll Cll (ll CLS 0 ~ ~ C7) t3 ~ Cn ~ C Cd C 7 ~ Cts ~ N N ~. O ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ C ~ ~ ~ .O (ts O ~ E C E ~ CZS ~ C~ C O C~ E Q ~ C fll ~ O~ (~ ° `~ ~ o_~- ~ ° ` ~ o ~m au~ ~ cn ro c ~ctscc ao~ ? c ~-o o ~~ a>> m~ m 5 ro -ssEzsa~~`m g>c~~~a~ ma~a~>zT>omcts~a .~ .c -o~~ cism -o U -~~ Q Q o a~ m acn > ~~~ a> m m SU E~~ Q amr ¢ c Q~ S F 95 rn 0 . . ~ v v v N N N ~ ~ ~ d' ~ ~ d' N ' a a a Q Q Q Q Q Q a s a ~ ~ a o o ~ o o ~. Q O O O O U U U U U O O O) i O) ~ C1 ,r C1 ~ ~ L O O N N C~ C~ C !n C y C~ O O > O > O > O > O i C C O i C O O C 7 0 C 7 0 C 7 0 > O > N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ U ~ U ~ U ~ U D U ~ ~ • U U U U U U U U U U U . . O O O O O O O O O O O m m m m m m m m m m m a> o~ o o c -o - c -o ~ ago m - L a~'= cn ~ ~ >> c s c ~ - -o c o c o" c c~ Y o ~ ~°~ c ~ ~' ~ v ~ o co ~ ° ~ cts N ~ a~ L . ~ ~ -O p E ca i 7 ~~ C Q.~a i L T ~~ ~ C c~ 0 0 o ~ m pro ~ ~ ~ Q O N (~ ctS O ~ ~ p 0 ~~ O O c~ 7 J C U v ~ 0 _ ~~ 0 Q ~ ~ O O U ~ y ~ p ~ U c~ ` p O ~ ~~ ~ ~ O o E -O a~ o cts o -~ ±' E L O ~ U c~ ` ctl -6 O~ N¢ N U ~ Q o U U ~ _ ~ U a~ a~ ~cto O p p ~ ~. C "r L C C L >, ~~ L P L N~ O fn O_ 7 O N f~ N C~ U O L U i~ d t/J i~~ ~ O C ~ L L CO ~ ~ ~ C - ~~ C _ >, C ~ C c ~ ~ x C N -O O N~ ~ - N O Ln ` L c~ ~ > O~~ C~ "d ~~ O Q c~ ~ L Q. ~~ ~ CO ~ C X ~ p U a ~` i C O - N 7 C - >. O O Q C ~~ . O .~ ~ "~ i~ U A C C ~ ~ ~ ~ 7 cd U Q ' ~ ~ ~ N Q ~ ~ U O 0 O ~ ~ O ~ C • ~ N ctS Cn U p p i U U 0 O N i .~~, .~ c~ ~ T ~- U ~ ~ O O_ ~ L ~ O ~ O O ~-' ~ ~ ~ CJ L U ~ ~ ~ ` O ~ O d' ~ ~ > O ' U d `- O ~ c~ N Q C ~ - c~ - O ~ c N Q ~ ~ C O >> cn co O O - ~ ~ U C X p ~ U N L N 7~ U ~ y O~ ~ U O) O ~ ~ ~ O N O - ~ C ~ +J ~ L E V O 0 'p (~ Y ~ U L ~ '~ C 2i to C~ - CC N O L i o N U i O) O ' L O ~ O O U p -~ ~ Q O ~~ O U (~ Q N ~~ i O ~ y' ~ C ~~ N~ LL U _ y O~~ ` N C C O N N ~~ ~ O O Y ~ Q O ~ ~ U C~ N~ O~ U o~ p ~ Q -p Q j c U C ~ B ~ .fl c~ U~ to ~a c~ -O ~ m ~- V U O ~? O ctf O U- U S N c0 ~ L ~ c~ O U (n N ~ ~ co O >, Cn ~ ~ I- U (n ~ Cn O O ~ L U ~ ~ ~ p ~ (~ O U U ~ in ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ N ~` U ~ ~ ~ ~ (~ N~ O~ U ~ (~ ~ O~ f--' (Cf O C R f'-- ~ U • O • N • F 96 • c~~ c\7 M ~ ~ ~ ~ t7 N N N N N c+~ c+~ ' Q a o o U U a a C C C C C C O O CiS (~ CO (U f~ (Lf O O a a ~ n. a a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ m a~ m a~ m m a~ m > a~ > a~ > a~ > m > a~ > m > a~ > a~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ U U U U U U U U • O O m m O ~ o o O O o 0 m ~ ~ a m m ~ ~ w-o a» a~ ~ ~-a O ~ ~o °~ a~m~, ~ c m~ ~ c o__c~m ~ ~ °- O~ ~c~n a~ °-~ a~~c~ ~ °' N c c o ~n ~ m o .,... ~ ~ o - ~ ~ a - m U ~ L w c ~ ca 0 a> im ~ ~ a i o= mo o c ~ ~ ° "' ~ 0 c p ~ ~ L.n ~ L °' Qi o - ~ ~~ ca ~ m c a ~ ~-a~ o ~. i ~_a }. - - - ~ ° ~ c.> ew m om o c a c oo° ~~' o ~~~ 03~ o ~ ~ L ~n~ ~ N o~ m ~ ~ i ~ ~ o ~~ u, o c O u, ~ ~ L p~ C ~ C~~ C U C > >+ ~ O N O O to ~ E C ~ O ~ -O ~ N ~ O" CS3 ~ ~ ~ i O ~ ~ ~ m O = ~ 7 O U ~ ~ ~ U .~ .- ~ ~ '~' O N ~ - 0 ~ N ~ N ~ fn U fn ~«- (n Q S C E (d O U ~ - ~ C U Q ~ C~ O U O > O U C ~ ~ (~ lQ O 0 fn ~ 7 ~ 7 O U CO O CiS ~ O ~ O N ~ O ~ ~ O) O (A ~ _ O i ~ O C L_ L O Q O ~ ~ p 0 ~ O_ U ~ ~' V ~ ~ .fl N ~_ Q. N N L O D7 ~ ~ > ~ ~ v1 O ~ N L i p f N- '~ ` C O~ > ~~ N O O N C O N L O c0 ~ L Q ~ cT3 ~ ~ "~ L i ~ ~ i~ p Q ~., .~ ~ C >, ~ O '_' ~ c0 .~ L~ ~ ~ N~ E ~~ ~ L C ~ - ~ ~ T O ~ m O ~ ~ c0 ~ ~ ~ ~ T O V Q +- ~ _ ~ 7 O O ~ (6 ~ ~ p C O ~ ~ U ~ ~ O ctl U ~ ~ O L V7 U to N ~ O C ~ Q O O ~ Q ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ c0 ~ U . ~ ~ Q > ~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ C -p Y C ` "O U O O"p 'O to O~ C N~ O ct3 O `-~ U~ c~ O~ U ~ O "d Y~~ .-. ~~ O U - N C y U ~~ C ~ p ~ p 0 (~ N O U >+ L c~ C C c~ O c0 ~ Q O -O L ~ ~ E +- D E C O ~ O ~ ~ O O_ ~ - >, L ~ O U ~ ~ cUn ~ C O L C O „ N _ ~ ~ ~ O ~ O) ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~~ O ~ O. O O) ~ ~ C ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ ~ -~ ~ ~ -~ ~ ~ ~ ~ to O ~ U ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 -O ._. ~ ~ ~ -O N ~ 'D O ~ X O ~ ~ ~ ~ L ~ C 7 C _~ ~ ~ C ~ L ` O C O L C~ O a' C O ~ C N D O ~ ~ Q> ~ N O '- 7 ~ .«>> CO O > U L ~ W t/7 ~ c0 U ~ . - -_ ~ Q ~ O_ - Q Q -_ Q ~ ~ -_ Q. O Q ~ O ..Lr -_ ~ O Q ~ L -_ ~ N Q ~ ~ ~ C.> ~ U ~ i - O ~ ctS Q c0 ^ ^ rn O F 97 ~ ~ ° ' a a a a a s a o 0 0 0 0 L L L L O O O O O O > ~ > ~ > ~ > ~ > ~ > ~ m LL mm LL mm LL mm L.L ~ mm LL U U U U m m [0 • O O m m 0 0 o D o O ~ ~ ~ a. ~ m Cn ~ U~ Q i~ U~ .>. C C~ L ~~~~ O~ N~ ~ "" O O O O~ L ~ C O O L O~ C O~~ O O (SS ~ ! N>> ~~ _ N O O N ~ C N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ E ~ ~ Q ~ E O ~ tq vp- ~ U ~ ~ N 6 ~ N - ~ ~ c~ ~ in O U N i ~ p . ~ a ~ ~ p ~ C ~ cti O ~ cd c~ N Q ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ +- U O U ~ v i ~ ~ -O ~ C Q O ~ -O C O .r Q C Q ~ c0 ~ N> D E L C O Q Q N ~ N ~ = Q C- R3 N~ 7 C~ 0 ~ ~ ` 0~~ ~ ~ .. O -0 p 0 0 ~ E` c0 N ~ ~ O ~ . N ~ ~ O m ~ C~ 7 C N _O CO OQ ~ ~ ~ ~ O •-- > .. O ~ O ~ p s ~ ~ O ~ ~ O U ~ ~ Q C O O p 0 Cn U O O c~ Q -O U~ E O C ~~ - C A ~ ~ Q O ~ ~ ~ c~ 0 O O O ~ ~ ~ C~ 0 0 N i N a c~ ~ ~ c0 _ ~ ~ O~ U~~ O >, O -p ~ c~ Q- L L ~ E ~_ ~ ~ ~ ~ (~ O O O O _ O O>~ O~ ~ C~ Op N O x -p ~ U O U O~ 'C O ~ O N L O N ~ ~ - C ~ fn C .~ >. p ~ O Q »~ E U ~ - (d O C ~ O1 + Qj O (~ '~ C _O c~ ~ m i (~ _O N C O ~ C C In >+ C O C '~ ~ ~ m- C> U N O~ '~ ` C O O O O O U~ `~ O ~ E `~ O O~ 7 ~~ N O ~ `J V O~ p ~ ~ _ 3 E~ ~ Q O~ p _p C ~ L C[S Q ~ ~ O C "~ C~ C ~ ~ U ~ CS3 ~ .-C.,, i ~ O ~ C O O O O ~ 7 ~ L~ O ~ rte-. Q U ~ ~ m O y ~ ~ m O ~ U C C ~ O p ~ ; ~ ~ ~ Q ~ ~ N ~- Q ~ ~ ~ C ~ - y ~ C C O a O) E O C ~ °' ~ E E~~ O D U O """ O E >L j E O O H lA ~ C~ O C O O O ~ O C ~ O O C "p ~ ~ ~ D7 ~ ~ CO ~ - ctf ~ ~ p O > Q ~ "p U ~ O 'pd ~ ~ U ~ ~ ~ in ~ O -p c~ ~ p C co > ~ ~ U ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O c~ O C Q O ~ ~ ~ L C ~ •~- ` U O d a O N U OQ ~ _~ U U p~ Q Q L O~ U~ ~ Q C C O N~~ ~ ~ c`cs a. U m Qo~ a.~ aca `oQ as C ~, ~, o_ ~ ~ ° Q~ ~ ~ Q m E-o cn o a3~ mU 4 O N > c c~ N ~ ~ a - ° Q ~ ~ ~ c ~ ° • VJ O • C7 F 98 • • • M C7 ~ ~ ~t d' N U o o ¢ Q Q a a ~ 0 ~ 0 y ~ a~i L ~ C C C C ~ Q O O O O . O O U D1 i U D1 i U O7 i U Q1 i _ O ~ L C C~ C~ ~~ U O ~ O ~ p O D C O p 0 C O O U D U D U D U ~ • U ~ ~ U U U U m ~ ~ m m m m m 0 0 o c~ ~ U~ ~- ~ m ~ c~ C ca _° _ '- O~ ~n O O ~ c~ ~ N L v~ ~~ C O T 3 ~ U~ 0 ~ 0 U U "-' E ~ A C C ~ to U Q O _~ O O O c ~ ~ in a~ ~~ ~ T O~~ CD ~ - C O N ~ O~ V C'J ~ "O V O O` ~ ~ E N~ ~ N N Q ~ O c~ - O - y v i > ~ ~ C C p ~ C Q C U p Y "'"' ° U U E O~ m ~ Ci1 C O ~ ~_ V~ U Q C O ~ ~ ~ ~ Q ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ C ~ Qa ~ ~ (n ten m~'a~ ~> o O °-" ~ C n~~ O ~c~~~o-E - _ ~ N O ~ ~ m , ~ .fl ~ ~ .~ U p) m Q. N . "O C ~p O ~ V O O c~ to ~ ~`. O U C ~~ ~ _ UL~ ~ ~ y ~ ~ _ O ~ _ ~ ~ i ~ O ~ -p o O ~ O ~ to C_a ~ ~ O O ~ C ~ ~ D7 - ~ ~ C~ O Q U O O N Q Q ~~~ N N ~ a - O Q +. >, O C Q O d O C c~ C C O O Q asp °~ ~` ~ ~ O ~~ O M Uo .Q i ~' -o `~ C~ L L ~ a~ U fn a~ °-~ `~ ~ ~ C C~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ _ C~ E ~ CO C1 ~ ~ N C _O ~ O O O T E U p N~ C D •-- ~ ~ C j C fn ~ ~ C ~ CD O C O c ~- ~ ~ ~ N N ~ ~ L c0 c~ ~ U ~ ~ ~ N C ~ O ~ ~ ~ _ d ~ O ~ O ~ ~ Q 7 O ~ ~ ~ (n - ~ ~ ~ ~ >. O O V CO ~ ~ C C ~ ~ ~ 7 N -O ~ ~ to - ~ ~ O ~ "a O L ~ X U "_' C to "O U O O O C~~ ~ N p ~ O~ "O L p) -_ U C cd ~ "O to ~ U p ~ O ~ C O N O '~ - c0 p L ~ o N cn C ~ C p p ct1 c6 .._. m p ~ ? C p l Q +T, (~ ~ p c~ C O _ ~ 'r C ~ c6 N ) ~ Q N _ N = .-~ m Q _ O_ J p H C N N C i O X N to c~ ~ c~ ~ D >+ m ~ ~ ~ p ~ ~ C O U _ ~ ~ C ~ , ~ ~ O j ~, Q) ~ fn C~ U U ~ C ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ L C V U .~ O ~ O C a ~ ~ i (0 ~ ~ (~ U Cn U U ~ ~ ~ C'J ~ N ~ C O N y O _ "O O ~ ~ d ~ j ~ ~ ~ O - to E U C3 ~ . -. L I- In ~ ~ p L U LL tq O O O ~ U C~ ~ ~ L ~ N ~ U ~ c~ ~ ~ _ ~ C~ C~ ~ (~ C N ~ cn ~ ~ u7 OU ^ ^ F 99 • v ~ v ~ v c~ ~ ~ N N N N N N N CO ' a a a m a m a Q a ~ ~ ~ Q • O O O O L O O ~ ~ N ~ N ~ ~ N ~ O O ~ ~ ~ > j j ~ ~ ~ ~ H ~ ~ ~ W U U U U U U U U m m m m m m m m . • . W ~ ~ U ~ ~ m m m d m m m m ~ o o~~~o ~~v~ro `~a~i`m ~ ~~ ~ ~m~o ~ °~~ -av i ~ Qo~ ro o ~~ ~ ro ~ ~ °' L ~~ ~ ~, ~,~ ~ o m~-ao -a E ~° ~ ~ o ~ cn ono E o ~ ~ ~ ~ Q ~- ~ ~ ~-aci L c `o~ '`~ o _ ~ aa~ oo ~ a~ _ - O "d O- C O O C ~ U O .~ > C U td ~ ~ R{ Q O- lC) ~ .~ p U~ O O O O E~ 0 0 ~ ~ p ~ >, C •-~ >, to r C~ »- L i L ~ t ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O Q O ~ ~ W N C ~ N o ~ ~ U N C •- Q O ~~ = O O' U N N y O in O O i O O C (~ C Vi c0 Y (~ O ~ _ Q ~ co E ~ ~ ~ E ~ O O ~ ~ i L p N ~ O -O > QUj +-' ~ ~ O ~ _ ~ '~ c~ _ ~ O E N U c~ .~ C O C O uCj O L O O cd L ~ O .,- T O p U~ ~ L p O~ C C O Q N O ~ O L ~ c~ U U N -~ L L cL3 ~ O ~ p~ m cn ~ C O i .«. O C Q E N L N O- O O L~ U ~~ C C Z - S N N v~ O U S N ~~ cif E O M C N~~ ~ N N -p y O U L O (~ i O O ~ d U Q (n C C~ O ~ o ~ ~~~ E ~ ~ ~ ' O Y `~ i L ~ O L ~ ? - N ~ C O C~ L ~ ~ O O U C D O _ CSS O N~ C_ ~ N .O ... In E C ~ ~ 0 0 0 i C ~ N ~ r ~ +J O U Cn O N C to - ,-' C N O~ '~ ~ RS C E `J O~~ O L~ U C~ i i O Q~ N N~ ('~ ~ N ~ C p Q1 C E O ~ CO ~ O O C U O O O C C O~~ Q U ~~ O L U ~ .`. L O CO ~~ fn ""' (~ ~ C ~ ~ "6 ~~ 'a O U ~ H O C ""' y 0 0 p~ U C~ ~, w, ~ O~ "O -p .-~ .~ L O O O C O Q (A - O L C- U U O C D_ O O C oZf O~ U ~ O O O I L L~ C ~ ~~ ~ C to ~ • ~ -O ~ O rn O ~ O ~ O C ~ ~ fl.. 'D U ~ ~ O ~ O ~ ~ N p) ~ ~ O ~ p ~ N U O ~ ~ ct3 O ~ ~ O - O ~ v ~ ~ W O ~ Q ~ p O U ~ ~ (0 "= ~ C ~ ~ ~ C ~ ~ ~ ~ C L - p) C L C C C ~ ~ ~ - In . i U ~ + O 0_ ~ O (~ ~ ~ ~ O p y - U O 7 U >, W > ~n c0 ~ ~ O O ~ U c0 L - c0 > L ~ Q C c~ - ' ~ `-' cn O ~ O ~ - O ~ ~ ~ ~ O O Q ~ a u> ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Q ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ai "O ~ ~ U c~ ~ ~ ca ~ Q ~ U ti ~ o > c> U ~ Z O . F100 • • ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N N N N N N ' a a a a a a _~ a o Q Q Q O O CJ O O O 7 ` N O ~ N O O O N N 7 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ D U ~ ~ ~ • Q Q Q Q Q ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ m CO m CO m m Q m m m m m U m a~ a~ c~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ a~ c -a o - ~ ~ - o c~ ~ ~ ... O O O L ~ C L C~ ~ ~ C O ~ C ~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ L C C ~ O O p Q N ~ c~ ~ L O ~ ~ N~~ ~ Q C O "- p 0 ~ C "' ~ ~ ~ O~~ U ~ Q- >' O . U Q O O ~ Q I ct3 C ~ .Q L p C C ~ U ~ ~ N~ C ~ CO ~ >' ~ ~ N U ~$ O ~ p ~ U . p •-• U O to O p O U P . O "O N p U Q ~ ~ c0 O N ~ C n- ~ ~ N ~ ~ ~ p) ~ (~ ~ cn .- ~ t~ O Q N O p -O C C ~ O p N ~ ~~ E ~ ~ O c0 N O ~~ Q O_ C C c~ (~ L ~ N (II O U O~ O_ ~ 7 - in ~ r U c~ O -C p ~ C O m ~ ~ ~ _ ~ ~ _, ~ ~ N ~ O ~ -~ -O ~ .~.r z ~ -p ~ CJ ~ ~ .-- ~ ~ ~ O J ~ ~ ~ ~ O n ~ ~ ~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ ~ Qj N ~ ~ 7 ~ ~ ~ O L - L ~ ~ ..+ ~ ~ ~ ~ O (~ ~ X ~ Q D) - ~ O ~ ~ O N O ~ ~ N ~ E ~ ~ ~ O ~ ° ' ~ C ~ U °~~ a ~ ~ ° o o>~ C o c ~a~i ~ ~~ ~ c O a~o°~~ ~~ ~ - ~ ~ Q c~~~c ooro w .~o a aim-c ~c ~ c~~a~~o ~ - Q 7 ~ 't Q U O m -p ~ O ~ p N ~ c~ ~ ~ p ~ ~ ~ N U ~ O ~ c~ c~ ~ > to to ~ ~ to ~ "-' C O to O _ C6 N `- N Q ~ Q y >^ ~ ~ N r _ ~ O U O C ~ 'D ~ O C >` O ~ ~~ O O L ~ U 7~ ~ O ~ C C~~ U , _ N C i CO N~ (~ Q C U O~ ~ O- ~ ~ ~ ~ C O p m ~ can" L ~ C ~ o ~ N ~ ° p-o C QOM c X O O C~ N a~E ~ ~ Zvi ~ C p 0 ` p Qo o ~ in a~i ~ N ai O ~ ~ o O m ~-a ~" ~ U > ~ Q ~ N a ~ o-o ~ c ~ c~ c~ c6 ~ O ~ ~ U O 0 Q ~ ~ C i ~ ~ 7 ~ ~ ~ ~ > ~ (~ N j ~ ~ ~Q ~ ~ N ~ ~ ~ ° ' • ~,- O (v C E o C ~ o o N ~~ ~~ ~ ~ x m ~ a~ E ~~= E~ ~ H ~ -O RS OU Q U ~ U O ~ O ~ O_ cq O I- ~ ~ ~ OU ~ J ctf ~ ~ N ~ ~ ~ O_ O F101 N N ~ ~ U U a a Q Q Q a C 0 c 0 O O U U ~ ~ ~ ~ m~ ~ _ Cn (ll U '- C O O O C 0 0 ~ ~ ~ U U • • m m U U . . m m m U cd d cti E ~ ~ ~ O ~ C C ~_ C ~ _~ ~ .~ ~ ~ ~ ~ >, - ~ ~ O N Y ~ .Q ct$ N > ~_ > N N O ~ .-- ~ ~ N z '~ U ~ 7 C ~ ~ ~ C C O O >' ~ C ~ O ~ 7 O -6 U ~ C O U ~ N _ C> W O U O `p O Q (1 O O fll ~ L L ~ O N C L ~~ ~ C~ T ~ . - (ll O f1 0 ~ ~ U O (v L ,... U c~ (n ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ L ~ O O p O ~ p~ ~ C ~ -O ~ ~ ctJ ~ N ~' C~ C C N ~ O~ ~~ ~ O~ z (0 ~ C ~ U Q (1 j ~~~ O E U L ++ O ~' "~ Q ,_. ~ ~ U- O ~ (1) L C U C ~ O ~ (I) ~,. ~ ~ ~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ (~ ~ . . z z ~ O O U ~ L ~ ~ O . O X ~ ~ ~- '~ ~ O ~ ~ fll to ~ _ ~ O Q L O, ~ U O O Q •~ (ll ~ -O ~ ~ ~ C ~ C " ~ C~ ~ > ~. - ~ it O (v ~ (ll ~ i ~ ~ N Q ~ ,~, ~ N W _ O _ 7 O> 't3 ~ U C U m ~~ O ~ (ll ~ ~ O in L O ~ ~ C O ~ a- ~ ctf p~ cts p ~ ~ 0 ~ p it ~ ~-- O O ~ O O O • ~ C ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ C N c~ >' O O O O N ~ ~ C C U O O ~ ~ ~ c~ O O O m +-~ C • L W N ~ ~ >+ C N (0 Q ~ > O > m ~ Q) ~ ~ U ~ ~ ~ c~ C O t~ O O C ~, `.. _ . U ~ N ~ ~ ~ - - ~ ~ ctS -O ~ N ~ N ~ Q) O C C C t N ~ t~ ctS .D ~ O O C~ p ~ E 'p ~ Cts O O to ,~ _ ~ N ~ ~ O) - O C~ ~ ~ ~ L O ~ ~ "O -" ~_ U. U U O O ~ O c0 Z ~ O C C ~~ ~ ~ U U _ O CD ~ _ CT 'D O C C (0 CIS C r ~ C ~ C CO ~ • C O O 'J O .-. c~ U - Z RS a > C c~ O W E 0 0 O O' cd O fll (d O Q L O N L ,~ > O ~ N O L }' U ~ ~ ~~ C2 ~ U C U O O "y ~ U C U _ C V C •~ O "- O O C O C O i O O O ., _. - ~--~ C N 0 fn ~ O O _~ >. `-' ~ ~ '~_ O c~ O I L Cn Cn O Cn Cn ~ ~ U ~ Q ~> > O ~ cts O O O ~L t~~ ~ ~~ U ~ i"" 0 Cn O O N r L (ll O Cn rn .~ Cn > -O ~L~ ~"~ ~n"~ ~~ N O . O .... ~ O n- X 0 0 ~ ~ C ~ O O U ~ ~ 0 0~ co O C ,~ ~ C L in O ~ ~ -p Cn ~ c O -O ~ ~ - ,~ N~ O N C O cts ~~ C O Cn -O N ~ O ~ ~ (p -O m -p (ll -p ~ ~ U = (O OO> O N c~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O N ~ O ~ O O O p i0 O c~ O ~ ~ U ~ O- 7 c~ O cIf ~ c~ ~ r W to ~ ~'a> ~0~ W O O~U W O~COC.~ z UL(A Cn ~ ~L in ~ ~ ~ in U in ~ O • F102 • J • C Q C U ~ i C: ~ ~ ~ 0 Q U • O m ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ c~ C ~ O O N (LS ~ Q C ~ O ~ O "O ~O C 7 ~ ~ O .Q ~ ~ Y ~ O U O O .'_- O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ct3 O ; ~ ~ O O ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~ O~ O L N ~~ i +-+ ~ ~~ O i 7 v~~°~m~ roo N a Q O ~- O O cn Q C~ V fn (n U O O ~ ~ ~ ~ Q~ ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ O O ~ -p ~ U '-' ~ 'O ~ ~ C/) p 00 L_ cS5 p to c~ ~ L .O`. O C <~ ~ ~ N 7 c00 !` 'p C C ~ ~ i Q " ~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ C O C p- ~ E ~. U N ~ RS m a w "O U O 7 ~ -Np C O m p ~ O 47 m ro 'a ~ U ~ O ~ (9 N O O ~ N ¢ C7 - U .` Q. m ~ U ~ o ~ O ~ p O L L L C p O C ~ ~ ~ O ~ ~ ~ U ~ N ('') ~ ~ CO I~ y C ro a a~ m o ~ a w ~ o_ Q o O .-+ °~ ~ V c ~ ~° ,~ L O U ~ E . ~ ~ O ~' U G -Y L7 Cn W. ~ C N ~ N ~ a> Q CJ i~ ~ ~ C m L c (U ~ N O O d cn ~ ~ Q m U D C N (~ O O C C ~ _ O ~ C O U ` ~ _ i C o ti Z `~ c U a C1 ~ o U ~ o ~ a m w ° ' o 4 !- ~ o U ro ~ ~ ~ o a ~ C O Q O ~ ~ Q m U m W p m C w p a 0 0 U ~ N N Q~ C O C _O) ~ O N E `~ O c O7 ~ _ol O ~ ~ O ~ ~ N ~ O ~ L G1 O ~ O O O _ ~ O C N - a ~ ~ ~, ~ ~ O d ~ _ ~ m C "' p ro o ~ E °~ m m U L ~ of c w -o ~ U U ~ ~ ~ a ~ p. ~ ~ U m a. ~ d o p w 0 0 0 ~ U d U m d ti ~_ 01 Q N_ Y V d t U _O A d Y O F103 ,~--., ;~-~ ~.~~ ._ -~ ~ ~` -~ ~, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT # DRC2006-00580 SUBJECT CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICANT LOCATION MARK SATER SOUTHEAST CORNER OF ARROW ROUTE AND ETIWANDA AVENUE, APN 0229-141-10 AND 11 ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS General Requirements 1 The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, Its agents, officers, or employees, because of the Issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval The applicant shall reimburse the Clty, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees maybe required by a court to pay as a result of such action The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition 2 Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No 07-74, Standard Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size) The sheet(s) are for Information only to all parties involved In the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect 3 The applicant shall be required to pay any applicable Fish and Game fees as shown below The protect planner will confirm which fees apply to this protect Ail checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to the Planning Commission or Planning Director hearing a) Notice of Exemption - $50 b) Notice of Determination - $50 c) Mitigated Negative Declaration - $ 1,850 X d) Environmental Impact Report - $2,550 1-05 I \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2007 Res & Stf Rpt\DRC2006-00580StdCond 12 12 doc Completion Date -/-/. -/_/ -/-/- F104 Protect No DRC2006 00580 Completion Date B. Time Limits 1 Conditional Use Permit approval shall expire if building permits are not issued or approved use _/_/_• has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval No extensions are allowed C. Site Development 1 The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include _/_/_ site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, and the Development Code regulations 2 Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, ail Conditions _/_/_ of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director 3 Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Building Code and _/_/_ State Fire Marshal regulations have been compiled with Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Department to show compliance The buildings shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy 4 Revised site plans and building elevations Incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be _/_/_ submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits 5 All site, grading, landscape, Irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for _/_/_ consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc) or prior to final map approval In the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first 6 Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all _/_/_ other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans In effect at the time of building permit issuance 7 A detailed on-site lighting plan, including a photometric diagram, shall be reviewed and approved _/_/_ by the Planning Director and Police Department (477-2800) prior to the Issuance of building permits Such plan shall indicate style, illumination, location, height, and method of shielding so as not to adversely affect adjacent properties 8 All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc ,shall be _/_/_ located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the Planning Director For single-family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults 9 All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, _/_/_ including proper Illumination 10 All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property _/_/_ owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for Planning Director and City Engineer review and approved prior to the issuance of building permits 11 The developer shall submit a construction access plan and schedule for the development of all _/_/_ lots for Planning Director and City Engineer approval, including, but not limited to, public notice requirements, special street posting, phone listing for community concerns, hours of construction activity, dust control measures, and security fencing 12 Where rock cobble Is used, It shall be real river rock Other stone veneers may be manufactured _/_/_ products • 2 I \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2007 Res & Stf Rpt\DRC2006-00580StdCond 12-12 doc F105 Protect No DRC2006-00580 Completion Date D. Commercial Centers • 1 Provide for the following design features in each trash enclosure, to the satisfaction of the Planning Director a Architecturally integrated into the design of (the shopping center/the project) b Separate pedestrian access that does not require the opening of the main doors and to include self-closing pedestrian doors c Large enough to accommodate two trash bins d Roll-up doors e Trash bins with counter-weighted lids f Architecturally treated overhead shade trellis g Chain link screen on top to prevent trash from blowing out of the enclosure and designed to be hidden from view 2 Graffiti shall be removed within 72 hours 3 The entire site shall be kept free from trash and debris at all times and in no event shall trash and debris remain for more than 24 hours 4 Signs shall be conveniently posted for "no overnight parking" and for "employee parking only " 5 All operations and businesses shall be conducted to coi~nply with the following standards which shall be incorporated Into the lease agreements for all tenants • a Noise Level -All commercial activities shall not create any noise that would exceed an exterior noise level of 60 dB during the hours of 10 p m until 7 a m and 65 dB during the hours of l a m until 10 p m b Loading and Unloading - No person shall cause the loading, unloading, opening, closing, or other handling of boxes, crates, containers, building materials, garbage cans, or other similar objects between the hours of 10 p m and 7 a m unless otherwise specified herein, in a manner which would cause a noise disturbance to a residential area 6 Textured pavement shall be provided across circulation aisle, pedestrian walkway, and plaza They shall be of brick/tile pavers, exposed aggregate, integral color concrete, or any combination thereof Full samples shall be submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits 7 The lighting fixture design shall compliment the architectural program It shall include the plaza area lighting fixtures, building lighting fixtures (exterior), and parking lot lighting fixtures 8 Any outdoor vending machines shall be recessed into the building faces and shall not extend into the pedestrian walkways The design details shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Director prior to the issuance of building permits E. Building Design 1 All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted equipment and/or projections, shall be shielded from view and the sound buffered from adjacent properties and streets as required by the Planning Department Such screening shall be architecturally integrated with the building design and constructed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director Details shall be Included in building plans 3 I \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2007 Res & Stf Rpt\DRC2006-00580StdCond 12-12 doc -/-/- _/-/ -/-/ -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/-~ -/-/. -/-/- -/_/. -/-/- F106 Protect No DRC2006-00580 Completion Date 2 For commercial and industrial projects, paint roll-up doors and service doors to match main _/_/_ building colors • F. Parking and Vehicular Access (indicate details on building plans 1 All parking spaces shall be 9 feet wide by 18 feet long When a side of any parking space abuts _/_/_ a building, wall, support column, or other obstruction, the space shall be a minimum of 11 feet wide 2 All parking lot landscape islands shall have a minimum outside dimension of 6 feet and shall _/_/_ contain a 12-inch walk adjacent to the parking stall (including curb) 3 Ali parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles, entrances, _/_/_ and exits shall be striped per City standards 4 Handicap accessible stalls shall be provided for commercial and office facilities with 25 or more _/_/_ parking stalls Designate two percent or one stall, whichever is greater, of the total number of stalls for use by the handicapped 5 Motorcycle parking area shall be provided for commercial and office facilities with 25 or more _/_/_ parking stalls Developments with over 100 parking stalls shall provide motorcycle parking at the rate of one percent The area for motorcycle parking shall be a minimum of 56 square feet G. Trip Reduction 1 Bicycle storage spaces shall be provided in all commercial, office, industrial, and multifamily _/_/_ residential projects of more than 10 units Minimum spaces equal to five percent of the required automobile parking spaces or three bicycle storage spaces, whichever is greater After the first 50 bicycle storage spaces are provided, additional storage spaces required are 2 5 percent of the required automobile parking spaces Warehouse distribution uses shall provide bicycle storage spaces at a rate of 2 5 percent of the required automobile parking spaces with a minimum of a • 3-bike rack In no case shall the total number of bicycle parking spaces required exceed 100 Where this results in a fraction of 0 5 or greater, the number shall be rounded off to the higher whole number 2 Category 5 telephone cable or fiber optic cable shall be provided for office buildings and other _/_/_ non-residential development 3 Transit improvements such as bus shelters, bus pullouts, and bus pads shall be provided Bus _/_/_ shelters shall also include a bench, a trash receptacle, and an adjoining bike rack (minimum 3 capacity) on a concrete pad Bus shelter shall be located outside public right-of-way and shall be privately maintained H. Landscaping 1 A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in _/_/_ the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision 2 A minimum of 20% of trees planted within industrial projects, and a minimum of 30% within _/_/_ commercial and office projects, shall be specimen size trees - 24-inch box or larger 3 Within parking lots, trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15-gallon tree for every three parking _/_/_ stalls • 4 I \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2007 Res & Stf Rpt\DRC2006-00580StdCond 12-12 doc F107 Project No DRC2006-00580 4 Trees shall be planted in areas of public view adjacent to and along structures at a rate of one tree per 30 linear feet of building 5 Special landscape features such as mounding, alluvial rock, specimen size trees, meandering sidewalks (with horizontal change), and intensified landscaping, is required along Arrow Route and Etiwanda Avenue 6 Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on the perimeter of this project area shall be continuously maintained by the developer 7 All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment If located in public maintenance areas, the design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Department 8 Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of Xeriscape as defined in Chapter 19 16 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code I. Environmental Mitigation measures are required for the protect The applicant is responsible for the cost of Implementing said measures, including monitoring and reporting Applicant shall be required to post cash, letter of credit, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the Planning Director in the amount of $ 538 prior to the issuance of building permits, guaranteeing satisfactory performance and completion of all mitigation measures These funds may be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measures Failure to complete all actions required by the approved environmental documents shall be considered grounds for forfeit J. Other Agencies • 1 The applicant shall contact the U S Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location of mailboxes Multi-family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for mailboxes with adequate lighting The final location of the mailboxes and the design of the overhead structure shall be subject to Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS NOTE ANY REVISIONS MAY VOID THESE REQUIREMENTS AND NECESSITATE ADDITIONAL REVIEW(S) K General Requirements Submit five complete sets of plans including the following a Site/Plot Plan, Foundation Plan, c Floor Plan, d Ceiling and Roof Framing Plan, e Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of the main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams, f Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams, water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning, and • I \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2007 Res & Stf Rpt\DRC2006-00580StdCond 12-12 doc Completion Date -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- F108 Protect No DRC2006-00580 Completion Date g Planning Department Project Number (i e , DRC2006-00580) clearly identified on the outside of all plans 2 Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a soils report _/_/_~ Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are required prior to plan check submittal 3 Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers' Compensation coverage to _/_/_ the City prior to permit issuance 4 Separate permits are required for fencing and/or walls _/_/_ 5 Business shall not open for operation prior to posting the Certificate of Occupancy issued by the _/_/_ Building and Safety Department L. Site Development 1 Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction All plans shall be _/_/_ marked with the project file number (i e , DRC2006-00580) The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted California Codes, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application Contact the Building and Safety Department for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts 2 Prior to issuance of building permits for a new commercial or industrial development project or _/_/_ mayor addition, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate Such fees may include but are not limited to City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Check Fees, Construction and Demolition Diversion Program deposit and fees and School Fees Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Building and Safety Department prior to permits issuance 3 Street addresses shall be provided by the Building and Safety Official after tract/parcel map _/_/_ recordation and prior to issuance of building permits • 4 Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m Monday /_/_ through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays 5 Construct trash enclosure(s) per City Standard (available at the Planning Department's public _/_/ counter) M New Structures 1 Provide compliance with the California Building Code (CBC) for property line clearances _/_/_ considering use, area, and fire-resistiveness 2 Provide compliance with the California Building Code for required occupancy separations _/_/_ 3 Provide draft stops in attic areas, not to exceed 3,000 square feet, in accordance with CBC _/_/_ Section 1505 4 Exterior walls shall be constructed of the required fire rating In accordance with CBC Table 5-A _/_/_ 5 Openings in exterior walls shall be protected in accordance with CBC Table 5-A _/_/_ 6 Upon tenant improvement plan check submittal, additional requirements may be needed _/_/_ • 6 I \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2007 Res & Stf Rpt\DRC2006-00580StdCond 12-12 doc F109 Project No DRC2006-00580 N Grading 1 Grading of the subject property shall be In accordance with California Building Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices The final grading plan shall be In substantial conformance with the approved grading plan 2 A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work 3 A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the time of application for grading plan check 4 The final grading plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted, and approved by the Bullding and Safety Official prior to the Issuance of building permits 5 A separate grading plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill The grading plan shall be prepared, stamped, and signed by a California registered Civil Engineer APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS O. Dedication and Vehicular Access Dedication shall be made of the following rights-of-way on the perimeter streets (measured from street centerline) • 60 total feet on Etiwanda Avenue 50 total feet on Arrow Route 2 Corner property line cutoffs shall be dedicated per City Standards 3 Additional street right-of-way shall be dedicated along right turn lanes, to provide a minimum of 7 feet measured from the face of curbs P. Street Improvements Pursuant to City Council Resolution No 88-557, no person shall make connections from a source of energy, fuel or power to any building service equipment which is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is required unless, In addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all Improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Council, except that in developments containing more than one building or unit, the development may have energy connections made to a percentage of those buildings, or units proportionate to the completion of improvements as required by conditions of approval of development In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings or units be connected to energy prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of approval of development • 7 I \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2007 Res & Stf Rpt\DRC2006 00580StdCond 12-12 doc Completion Date -~-~. -~-~ -~-~ _~-~. -~-~- -~-~. -~-~- -~-~- -~-~- -~-~. -~-~ F110 2 Construct the following perimeter street Improvements including, but not limited to Project No DRC2006 00580 Completion Date -/-/- Street Name Curb & Gutter A C Pvmt Side- walk Drrve Appr Street Lights Street Trees Comm Trail Median Island Bike Trail Other Etlwanda Avenue X X X X X (f) Arrow Route X X X X X (e) Notes (a) Median Island Includes landscaping and irrigation on meter (b) Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check (c) If so marked, sidewalk shall be curvilinear per Standard 114 (d) If so marked, an in-lieu of construction fee shall be provided for this item (e) Bus bay/right-turn lane (f) Right-turn lane 3 Improvement Plans and Construction a Street Improvement plans, Including street trees, street Ilghts, and Intersection safety Ilghts on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Clvll Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street Improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first b Prior to any work being performed In public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the Clty Engineer's Office in addition to any other permits required c Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and Interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer d Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction project along mafor or secondary streets and at Intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer Notes 1) Pulf boxes shall be No 6 at intersections and No 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer 2) Conduit shall be 3-Inch galvanized steel with pull rope or as specified e Handicapped access ramps shall be installed on all corners of intersections per City Standards or as directed by the Clty Engineer f Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction Street or lane closure permits are required A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer g Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to Clty Standards, except for single family residential lots h Street names shall be approved by the Planning Director prior to submittal for first plan check Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per Clty Standards in accordance with the City's street tree program 8 -/ /- / / -/--/- / / • -/ /_ -/-/-- / /_ -/-/- -/-/- • I \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2007 Res & Stf Rpt\DRC2006 00580StdCond 12-12 doc F111 Protect No DRC2006-00580 5 Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows The completed legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street Improvement plans Street Improvement plans shall Include a Ilne item within the constructlon legend stating "Street trees shall be Installed per the notes and legend on sheet_(typlcally sheet 1) " Where public landscape plans are required, tree Installation In those areas shall be per the public landscape Improvement plans The Clty Engineer reserves the right to adjust tree species based upon field conditions and other variables For additional Information, contact the Project Engineer Street Name Botanical Name Common Name Min Grow Space Spacing Size Qty Arrow Route Ginkgo Biloba 'Fairmont' Maindenhair Tree 5' 25' O C 24" Box Fill Formal on in alternating side of meandering walk Etiwanda Avenue Genera parviflora Austailian Willow 5' 20' O C 15 Gal Construction Notes for Street Trees 1) All street trees are to be planted In accordance with Clty standard plans 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City Inspector Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backflll soli amendments, as determined by the City inspector 3) All street trees are subfect to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Department 4) Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only 6 Intersection Ilne of sight designs shall be reviewed by the Clty Engineer for conformance with adopted policy On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all project Intersections, Including driveways Local residential street Intersections and commercial or industrial driveways may have Imes of sight plotted as required Q. Public Maintenance Areas A signed consent and waiver form to loin and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the City Engineer prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits whichever occurs first Formation costs shall be borne by the developer 2 Parkway landscaping on the following street(s) shall conform to the results of the respective Beautification Master Plan for Arrow Route R. Drainage and Flood Control A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the Clty Engineer prior to final map approval or the Issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first All drainage facilities shall be Installed as required by the Clty Engineer Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surface drainage entering the property from adjacent areas S. Utilities Provide separate utility services to each parcel Including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) In accordance with the Utility Standards Easements shall be provided as required 9 \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2007 Res & Stf Rpt\DRC2006-00580StdCond 12-12 doc Completion Date -/-/. -/-/- -/-/- --/-/- -/-/- -/_/ -/-/- F112 Project No DRC2006 00580 Completion Date 2 The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary _/_/_ 3 Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the _/_/ Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino A letter of compliance from the CVW D is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects 4 Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved _/_/_ Approval of the final parcel map will be subject to any requirements that may be received from them T. General Requirements and Approvals 1 The separate parcels contained within the project boundaries shall be legally combined into one _/_/_ parcel prior to issuance of building permits 2 An easement for a Point use driveway shall be provided prior to final map approval or issuance of _/_/_ building permits, whichever occurs first, for Arrow Route Access 3 Etiwanda/San Sevaine Area Regional Mainline, Secondary Regional, and Master Plan Drainage _/_/_ Fees shall be paid prior to final map approval or prior to building permit issuance if no map is involved 4 Anon-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all _/_/_ new streetlights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to building permit issuance if no map is involved 5 Prior to the issuance of building permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall __/_/_ • be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program The deposit is fully refundable if at least 50% of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City Form CD-1 shall be submitted to the Engineering Department when the first building permit application is submitted to Building and Safety Form CD-2 shall be submitted to the Engineering Department within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition protect 6 Prior to approval of the final map, or prior to improvement agreement approval if no map Is involved, all Tract Maps, Parcel Maps and public improvement plans shall be submitted to the Engineering Division on a compact disc (CD) in Auto CAD (computer aided design) format if public improvement plans are completed after map approval, the CD shall be submitted prior to issuance of a construction permit for frontage improvements or a building permit, whichever occurs first APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE POLICE DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2800, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS U. Security Lighting 1 All parking, common, and storage areas shall have minimum maintained 1-foot candle power _/_/_ These areas should be lighted from sunset to sunrise and on photo sensored cell 2 All buildings shall have minimal security lighting to eliminate dark areas around the buildings, with _/_/_ direct lighting to be provided by all entryways Lighting shall be consistent around the entire development 10 I \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2007 Res & Stf Rpt\DRC2006-00580StdCond 12-12 doc F113 3 Lighting in exterior areas shall be in vandal-resistant fixtures Security Hardware Project No DRC2006-00580 Completion Date -~-~- 1 One-inch single cylinder dead bolts shall be installed on all entrance doors If windows are within 40 Inches of any locking device, tempered glass or a double cylinder dead bolt shall be used 2 All garage or rolling doors shall have slide bolts or some type of secondary locking devices 3 All roof openings giving access to the building shall be secured with either iron bars, metal gates, or alarmed W. Windows 1 Storefront windows shall be visible to passing pedestrians and traffic 2 Security glazing is recommended on storefront windows to resist window smashes and Impede entry to burglars X. Building Numbering 1 Numbers and the backgrounds shall be of contrasting color and shall be reflective for nighttime visibility 2 Developer shall paint roof top numbers on one or more roofs of this development They shall be a minimum of three feet in length and two feet in width and of contrasting color to background The stencils for this purpose are on loan at the Rancho Cucamonga Police Department Alarm Systems 1 Install a burglar alarm system and a panic alarm if needed Instructing management and employees on the operation of the alarm system will reduce the amount of false alarms and in turn save dollars and lives 2 Alarm companies shall be provided with the 24-hour Sheriff's dispatch number (909) 941-1488 ~ APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DEPARTMENT, FIRE PROTECTION PLANNING SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SEE ATTACHED 11 -~-~- -~-~- -~-~- -~-~- -~-~- -~-~ -~-~. -~-~ -~-~- I \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2007 Res & Stf Rpt\DRC2006-00580StdCond 12-12 doc F114 4oMO~? ~ Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection ~~ District -~ - Fire Construction Services STANDARD CONDITIONS May 24, 2007 AM/PM 12925 Arrow Fuel Station/Convenience Store/Fast Food Restaurant DRC2006-00580 THE FOLLOWING STANDARD CONDITIONS APPLY TO THIS PROJECT The RCFPD Procedures & Standards which are referenced m this document can be access on the web at http //www ci rancho-Cucamonga ca us/fire/index htm under the Fire Safety Division & Fire Construction Services section Search by article, the preceding number of the standard refers to the article Chose the appropriate article number then a drop down menu will appear, select the corresponding standard FSC-1 Public and Private Water Supply 1 Design guidelines for Fire Hydrants The following provides design guidelines for the spacing and location of fire hydrants a The maximum distance between fire hydrants in commercial/industrial projects is 300- feet No portion of the exterior wall shall be located more than 150-feet from an approved fire hydrant For cul-de-sacs, the distance shall not exceed 100-feet b Fire hydrants are to be located The preferred locations for fire hydrants are 1 At the entrance(s) to a commercial, industrial or residential project from the public roadways 2 At intersections 3 On the right side of the street, whenever practical and possible 4 As required by the Fire Safety Division to meet operational needs of the Fire District 5 A minimum of forty-feet (40') from any building c If any portion of a facility or building is located more than 150-feet from a public fire hydrant measured on an approved route around the exterior of the facility or building, additional private or public fire hydrants and mains capable of supplying the required fire flow shall be provided d Provide one fire hydrant for each 1000 gpm of required fire flow or fraction thereof FSC-2 Fire Flow 1 The required fire flow for this project is 2000 gallons per minute at a minimum residual pressure of 20-pounds per square inch This requirement is made in accordance with Fire Code Appendix III-A, as adopted by the Fire District Ordinances 2 The required minimum fire flow for this project, when automatic fire sprinklers are installed is 1500 gallons per minute at a minimum residual pressure of 20-pounds per square inch F115 This flow reflects a 50-percent reduction for the installation of an approved automatic fire sprinkler system in accordance with NFPA 13 with central station monitoring This requirement is made in accordance with the California Fire Code Appendix III-A, as adopted by the Fire District Ordinances 3 Public fire hydrants located within a 500-foot radius of the proposed project may be used to provide the required fire flow subject to Fire District review and approval Private fire hydrants on adjacent property shall not be used to provide required fire flow 4 Firewater plans are required for all projects that must extend the existing water supply to or onto the site Building permits will not be issued until the public water plans are approved 5 On all site plans to be submitted for review, show all fire hydrants located within 600-feet of the proposed project site FSC-3 Prerequisite for submittal of Overhead Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems Prior to submitting plans for an overhead automatic fire sprinkler system, the applicant shall submit plans, speafications and calculations for the fire sprinkler system underground supply piping Approval of the underground supply piping system must be obtained prior to submitting the overhead fire sprinkler system plans FSC-4 Requirement for an Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems Rancho Cucamonga Fire District Ordinance 15, the 2001 California Fire Code and/or any other applicable standards require an approved automatic fire sprinkler system to be installed in 1 Commercial or industrial structures greater than 7,500 square feet 2 Assembly and Educational Occupancy Buildings 3 "All structures that do not meet Fire District access requirements (see Fire Access) . 4 When required fire flow cannot be provided due to inadequate volume or pressure 5 When buildings do not meet the requirements of the 2001 California Building Code and the RCFPD Fire Department Access -Fire Lane Standard 9-7 6 When any applicable code or standard requires the structure to be sprinklered FSC-5 Fire Alarm System Based on the number of sprinkler heads, the sprinkler system is required to monitored by a listed central station fire alarm system FSC-6 Fire District Site Access Fire District access roadways include public roads, streets and highways, as well as private roads, streets drive aisles and/or designated fire lanes Please reference the RCFPD Fire Lanes Standard 9-7 1 Location of Access All portions of the structures 1St story exterior wall shall be located within 150-feet of Fire District vehicle access, measure on an approved route around the exterior of the building Landscaped areas, unpaved changes in elevation, gates and fences are deemed obstructions 2 Specifications for private Fire District access roadways per the RCFPD Standards are a The minimum unobstructed width is 26-feet b The maximum inside turn radius shall be 20-feet c The minimum outside turn radius shall be 46-feet • d The minimum radius for cul-de-sacs is 45-feet 2 F116 e The minimum vertical clearance is 14-feet, 6-inches f At any private entry median, the minimum width of traffic lanes shall be 20-feet on each side g The angle of departure and approach shall not exceed 9-degrees or 20 percent h The maximum grade of the driving surface shall not exceed 12% i Support a minimum load of 70,000 pounds gross vehicle weight (GVW) ~ Trees and shrubs planted adjacent to the fire lane shall be kept trimmed to a minimum of 14-feet, 6-inches from the ground up Vegetation shall not be allowed to obstruct Fire Department apparatus 3 Access Doorways Approved doorways, accessible without the use of a ladder, shall be provided as follows a Access shall be provided in accordance with the 2001 California Building Code, Fire and/or any other applicable standards 4 Access Walkways Hardscaped access walkways shall be provided from the fire apparatus access road to all required building exterior openings 5 Commercial/Industrial Gates Any gate installed across a Fire Department access road shall be m accordance with Fire District Standard #9-2 The following design requirements apply a Prior to the fabrication and installation of the gates, plans are required to be submitted to Fire Construction Services (FCS) for approval Upon the completion of the installation and before placing the gates in service, inspection and final acceptance must be requested from FCS b Gates must slide open horizontally or swing inward c Gates may be motorized or manual d When fully open, the minimum clearance dimension of drive access shall be 20 feet • e Manual gates must be equipped with a RCFPD lock available at the Fire Safety Office for $20 00 f Motorized gates must open at the rate of one-foot per second g The motorized gate actuation mechanism must be equipped with a manual override device and afail-safe or battery backup feature to open the gate or release the locking Mechanism in case of power failure or mechanical malfunction h Motorized gates shall be equipped with a Knox override key switch The switch must be installed outside the gate in a visible and unobstructed location i For motorized gates, a traffic loop device must be installed to allow exiting from the complex ~ If traffic pre-emption devices (TPD) are to be installed, the device, location and operation must be approved by the Fire Chief prior to installation Bi-directional or multiple sensors may be required due to complexity of the various entry configurations 6 Fire Lane Identification Red curbing and/or signage shall identify the fire lanes A site plan illustrating the proposed delineation that meets the minimum Fire District standards shall be included in the architectural plans submitted to B&S for approval 7 Approved Fire Department Access Any approved mitigation measures must be clearly noted on the site plan A copy of the approved Alternative Method application, if applicable, must be reproduced on the architectural plans submitted to B&S for plan review 8 Roof Access There shall be a means of fire department access from the exterior walls of the buildings on to the roofs of all commercial, industrial and multi-family residential structures with roofs less than 75' above the level of the fire access road a This access must be reachable by either fire department ground ladders or by an aerial ladder b A minimum of one ladder point with a fixed ladder shall be provided in buildings with construction features, or high parapets that inhibit roof access 3 F117 c The number of ladder points may be required to be increased, depending on the building size and configuration d Regardless of the parapet height or construction features the approved ladder point • shall be identified in accordance to the roof access standard e Where the entire roof access is restricted by high parapet walls or other obstructions, a permanently mounted access ladder is required f Multiple access ladders may be required for larger buildings g Ladder construction must be in accordance with the RCFPD Roof Access Standard 9-9 Appendix A and drawings 9-9a and 9-9b h A site plan showing the locations of the roof ladder shall be submitted during plan check i Ladder points shall face a fire access roadway(s) FSC-10 Occupancy and Hazard Control Permits Listed are those Fire Code permits commonly associated with the business operations and/or building construction Plan check submittal is required with the permit application for approval of the permit, field inspection is required prior to permit issuance General Use Permit shall be required for any activity or operation not specifically described below, which in the judgment of the Fire Chief is likely to produce conditions that may be hazardous to life or property • Candles and open flames in public assemblies • Compressed Gases • Public Assembly • Dry Cleaning Plants • Repair Garages • Flammable and Combustible Liquids • • Hazardous Materials • Tents, Canopies and/or Air Supported Structures • Liquefied Petroleum Gases FSC-11 Hazardous Materials -Submittal to the County of San Bernardino The San Bernardino County Fire Department shall review your Business Emergency/Contingency Plan for compliance with minimum standards Contact the San Bernardino County Fire, Hazardous Materials Division at (909) 387-4631 for forms and assistance The County Fire Department is the Cal/EPA Certified Unified Program Agency (CUPA) for the City of Rancho Cucamonga 1 If the facility is a NEW business, a Certificate of Occupancy issued by Building & Safety will not be finalized until the San Bernardino County Fire Department reviews your Business Emergency/Contingency Plan California Government Code, Section 65850 2 prohibits the City from issuing a final Certificate of Occupancy unless the applicant has met or is meeting specific hazardous materials disclosure requirements A Risk Management Program (RMP) may also be required if regulation substances are to be used or stored at the new facility 2 Any business that operates on rented or leased property which is required to submit a Plan, is also required to submit a notice to the owner of the property in writing stating that the business is subject to the Business Emergency/Contingency Plan mandates and has complied with the provisions The tenant must provide a copy of the Plan to the property owner within five (5) working days, if requested by the owner 4 F118 FSC-12 Hazardous Materials -Submittal to Fire Construction Services Plans shall be submitted and approved prior to construction of buildings and/or the installation of equipment designed to store, use or dispense hazardous materials in accordance with the 2001 California Building, Fire, Mechanical, Plumbing, Electrical Codes, RCFPD Ordinances FD15 and FD39 and other implemented and/or adopted standards FSC-13 Alternate Method Application Fire Construction Services staff and the Fire Marshal will review all requests for alternate method, when submitted The request must be submitted on the Fire District "Application for Alternate Method" form along with supporting documents and payment of the $92 review fee FCS-15 Annexation of the parcel map Annexation of the parcel map into the Community Facilities District #85-1 or #88-1 is required prior to the issuance of grading or building permits Chronological Summary of RCFPD Standard Conditions PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS -Please complete the following prior to the issuance of any building permits 1 Private Water Supply (Fire) Systems The applicant shall submit construction plans, specifications, flow test data and calculations for the private water main system for review and approval by the Fire District Plans and installation shall comply with Fire District Standards Approval of the on-site (private) fire underground and water plans is required prior to any building permit issuance for any structure on the site Private on-site combination domestic and fire supply system must be designed in accordance with RCFPD Standards # 9-4, #10-2 and #10-4 The Building & Safety Division and Fire Construction Services will perform plan checks and inspections All private on-site fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable prior to delivering any combustible framing materials to the site Fire construction Services will inspect the installation, witness hydrant flushing and grant a clearance before lumber is dropped 2 Public Water Supply (Domestic/Fire) Systems The applicant shall submit a plan showing the locations of all new public fire hydrants for the review and approval by the Fire District and CCWD On the plan, show all existing fire hydrants within a 600-foot radius of the project Please reference the RCFPD Water Plan Submittal Procedure Standard 9-8 All required public fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable prior to delivering any combustible framing materials to the site CCWD personnel shall inspect the installation and witness the hydrant flushing Fire Construction Services shall inspect the site after acceptance of the public water system by CCWD Fire Construction Services must grant a clearance before lumber is dropped 3 Construction Access The access roads must be paved in accordance with all the requirements of the RCFPD Fire Lane Standard #9-7 All temporary utilities over access roads must be installed at least 14' 6" above the finished surface of the road 4 Fire Flow A current fire flow letter from CCWD must be received The applicant is responsible for obtaining the fire flow information from CCWD and submitting the letter to Fire Construction Services 5 Easements and Reciprocal Agreements All easements and agreements must be recorded with the County of San Bernardino 5 F119 PRIOR TO THE RELEASE OF TEMPORARY POWER The building construction must be substantially completed in accordance with Fire Construction i Services' "Temporary Power Release Checklist and Procedures" PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY OR FINAL INSPECTION -Please complete the following• 1 Hydrant Markers All fire hydrants shall have a blue reflective pavement marker indicating the fire hydrant location on the street or driveway in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Standard Plan 134, "Installation of Reflective Hydrant Markers" On private property, the markers shall be installed at the centerline of the fire access road, at each hydrant location 2 Private Fire Hydrants For the purpose of final acceptance, a licensed sprinkler contractor, in the presence of Fire Construction Services, shall conduct a test of the most hydraulically remote on-site fire hydrants The underground fire line contractor, developer and/or owner are responsible for hiring the company to perform the test A final test report shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services verifying the fire flow available The fire flow available must meet or exceed the required fire flow in accordance with the California Fire Code 3 Fire Sprinkler System Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler system(s) shall be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services 4 Fire Sprinkler Monitoring Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler monitoring system must be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services The fire sprinkler monitoring system shall be installed, tested and operational immediately following the completion of the fire sprinkler system (subject to the release of power) 5 Fire Suppression Systems and/or other special hazard protection systems shall be • inspected, tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services before occupancy is granted and/or equipment is placed in service 6 Fire Alarm System Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire alarm system shall be installed, inspected, tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services 7 Access Control Gates Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, vehicular gates must be inspected, tested and accepted in accordance with RCFPD Standards #9-1 or #9-2 by Fire Construction Services 8 Fire Access Roadways- Prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, the fire access roadways must be installed in accordance with the approved plans and acceptable to Fire Construction Services The CC&R's, the reciprocal agreement and/or other approved documents shall be recorded and contain an approved fire access roadway map with provisions that prohibit parking, specify the method of enforcement and identifies who is responsible for the required annual inspections and the maintenance of all required fire access roadways 9 Address. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, commercial/industrial and multi-family buildings shall post the address with minimum 8-inch numbers on contrasting background, visible from the street and electrically illuminated during periods of darkness When the building setback exceeds 200 feet from the public street, an additional non- illuminated 6-inch minimum number address shall be provided at the property entrance Larger address numbers will be required on buildings located on wide streets or built with large setbacks in multrtenant commercial and industrial buildings The suite designation numbers and/or letters shall be provided on the front and back of all suites 10 Hazardous Materials Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the applicant must demonstrate (in writing from the County) that the facility has met or is meeting the Risk Management Plan (RMP) or Business Emergency/Contingency Plan with the San 6 F120 Bernardino County Fire Department, Hazardous Materials/Emergency Response and Enforcement Division The applicant must also obtain inspection and acceptance by Fire • Construction Services 11 Confidential Business Occupancy Information The applicant shall complete the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District "Confidential Business Occupancy Information" form This form provides contact information for Fire District use in the event of an emergency at the subject building or property This form must be presented to the Fire Construction Services Inspector 12 Mapping Site Plan Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, a 8'/z" x 11" or 11" x 17" site plan of the site in accordance with RCFPD Standard #13-1 shall be revised by the applicant to reflect the actual location of all devices and building features as required in the standard The site plan must be reviewed and accepted by the Fire Inspector • ~.J F121 • ~ , e T H E C I T Y O F R A N C fl O C U C A M O N G A Siff Report DATE December 12, 2007 TO Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM James R Troyer, AICP, Planning Director BY Lois Schrader, Planning Commission Secretary SUBJECT ORDINANCE REGARDING TEMPORARY SIGNS - DRC2007-00495 -CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A review of a draft ordinance amending Sections 14 08 350, 14 16 010(P) and 14 16 020 and adding Chapter 14 25 to the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code concerning temporary signs This item will be forwarded to the City Council for final action CONTINUED FROM SEPTEMBER 26, 2007 AND NOVEMBER 14, 2007 • BACKGROUND Planning staff held a workshop regarding the ordinance on November 13, 2007 at 7 00 p m in the Council Chambers The Rancho Cucamonga Chamber of Commerce, the Inland Valleys Association of Realtors and the Citrus Valley Association of Realtors were specifically notified and their memberships invited to fully participate m the workshop An eighth page ad announcing the workshop and inviting public participation was also placed m the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin Considerable input was received at the workshop from real estate agents and business owners The Council Subcommittee has scheduled a meeting on December 19, 2007 to consider the comments and suggestions and to continue their work on the draft ordinance RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission continue their consideration of the draft Temporary Sign Ordinance DRC2007-00495 to an unspecified date to allow time for the Subcommittee to work on the draft ordinance that will be presented to staff and the Commission at a near future date for consideration When the meeting date has been set, the Temporary Sign Ordinance will be re-noticed as a public hearing Respectfully submitted, Jam R Troyer, AICP Planning Director JT/Is ITEM G