Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2007/06/13 - Agenda PacketTHE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA C~AMONGA JUNE 13, 2007 - 7:00 P M Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center Council Chambers 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California I. CALL TO ORDER Pledge of Allegiance Roll Call Chairman Stewart_ Vice Chairman Fletcher • Macias _ Vacant _ Munoz _ II. ANNOUNCEMENTS III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Regular Meeting Minutes dated May 9, 2007 Regular Meeting Minutes dated May 23, 2007 IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS The following items are public hearings rn which concerned individuals may voice the-r op-n-on of the related project Please wa-t to be recognized by the Chairman and address the Commrss-on by stat-ng your name and address All such oprn-ons shall be lim-ted to 5 minutes per -ndividual for each project Please sign in after speaking A TIME EXTENSION FOR TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16072 - RICHLAND PINEHURST INC - A request for a time extension for a previously approved tentative tract map to subdivide 150 79 acres into 359 lots in the Low (2-4 dwelling units per acre) and Very Low (0 1-2 dwelling • 1 of ~ PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA RANCHO JUNE 13, 2007 C,UCAMONGA units per acre) Residential Districts, with an average density of 2 3 dwelling units per acre for the entire project, m the upper Etiwanda Neighborhood of the Etiwanda North Specific Plan, located at the northwest corner of Wilson Avenue and East Avenue -APN 0225-083-01, 12, 13, 15, 16 and 20 Related files Development Agreement DRC2002-00156, Annexation DRC2002-00865, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2003-00461 Staff has found the project to be within the scope of the project covered by a prior Environmental Impact Report certified by City Council on June 16, 2004 by Resolution 04-204 and does not raise or create new environmental impacts not already considered in the Environmental Impact Report This item was continued from the May 23, 2007 meeting B CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2006-00510 - CASH AND ASSOCIATES ENGINEERS - A request for a land use entitlement for an existing legal non-conforming processing facility operated by Pacific Coast Recycling and to replace existing outdated automobile shredding and ferrous metal recycling plant facilities with modernized equipment on approximately 5 acres of land m the Heavy Industrial District (Subarea 15), located at 8822 Etiwanda Avenue -APN 0229-131-15 This project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15301 (Class 1 Exemption -Existing Facilities) The scope of the project consists of minor alteration to existing faalities, consisting of the changing out of existing industrial and mechanical equipment with modern industrial and mechanical equipment C CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2006-00985 - MMI TITAN ON BEHALF OF VERIZON WIRELESS - A request to construct a 48-foot high wireless communication facility m the Medium Residential District, located at 6627 Amethyst Avenue (Fire Station #171) -APN 0202-101-11 This project is categorically exempt from the requirement of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15301 (Class 1 Exemption -Existing Facilities) D VARIANCE DRC2007-00087 -MMI TITAN ON BEHALF OF VERIZON WIRELESS - A request to locate a 48-foot high single carrier mayor wireless communication facility within 300 feet of residential and within 100 feet of another mayor wireless communication facility in the Medium Residential District, located at 6627 Amethyst Avenue (Fire Station #171) - APN 0202-101-11 E ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - DRC2007-00076 - WILKUS ARCHITECTS - A request to develop a 6,852 • • • 2of5 • • • PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA JUNE 13, 2007 RANCHO G'IICAMONGA square foot full service restaurant with bar on an existing 70,000 square foot lot that is a part of a previously approved 7 01 acre master planned development in the Industrial Park District (Subarea 12), located at 11336 4th Street at the northeast corner of Milliken Avenue and 4th Street - Related Files Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16282 and Conditional Use Permit DRC 2003-00728 On January 28, 2004 a Mitigated Negative Declaration was adopted by the Planning Commission for Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16282 The California Environmental Quality Act provides that no further environmental review or Negative Declaration is required for subsequent projects or minor revisions to projects within the scope of a previous Mitigated Negative Declaration F TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM17808 -WILLIAM ESPINOZA - A request to subdivide a 75 acre parcel into two lots m the Low Residential district (2-4 dwelling units per acre) located at northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Palo Alto Street -APN 1077-022-74 The project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines The project qualifies as a Class 15 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15315, Minor Subdivisions G MODIFICATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO 85-37 - DRC2007- 00134 - EI POLLO LOCO - A request to expand the floor area of the existing fast food restaurant by approximately 1,091 square feet, m the Deer Creek Shopping Center in the General Commercial (GC) District, located at 7746 Haven Avenue, APN 1077-401-31 The Planning Department staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines The project qualifies as a Class 1 exemption, under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15301 (e) 2, Existing Facilities H MODIFICATION OF TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM17797 - RC HYSSOP, LLC - A request to subdivide 2 8 acres of land containing one building into 5 tenant spaces to create industrial condominiums located at 9272 Hyssop Drive m the Industrial Distract (Subarea 14) APN 0229-283- 12 This project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15315 Minor Land Divisions This action is a modification of Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM17797 which was approved for 4 tenant condominium spaces 3of5 PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA JUNE 13, 2007 RANCHO CUCAMONGA V. NEW BUSINESS VI. DIRECTOR' S REPORTS I UPDATE REPORT CONCERNING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR HILLSIDE COMMUNITY CHURCH VII. PUBLIC COMMENTS This is the dine and place for the general public to address the commission Items to be discussed here are those that do not already appear on this agenda VIII. COMMISSION BUSINESS/COMMENTS IX. ADJOURNMENT The Planning Commission has adopted Administrative Regu/abons that set an 11 00 p m adjournment time If items go beyond that time, they shall be heard only with the consent of the Commission 1, Lors J Schrader, Planning Commission Secretary of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on June 7, 2007, at least 72 hours poor to the meeting per Government Code Section 54964 2 at 10500 Civic Center Dnve, Rancho Cucamonga If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, -_.. please contact the Planning Department at (909) 477-2750 Notification of 48 hours pnor to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility Listening devices are available for the heanng impaired .7 • • 4 of 5 • • PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA RANCHO JUNE 13, 2007 CUCAMONGA INFORMATION FOR THE PUBLIC TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION The Planning Commission encourages free expression of all points of view To allow all persons to speak, given the length of the agenda, please keep your remarks brief If others have already expressed your position, you may simply indicate that you agree with a previous speaker If appropriate, a spokesperson may present the views of your entire group To encourage all views and promote courtesy to others, the audience should refrain from clapping, booing or shouts of approval or disagreement from the audience The public may address the Planning Commission on any agenda item To address the Planning Commission, please come forward to the podium located at the center of the staff table State your name for the record and speak into the microphone After speaking, please sign in on the clipboard located next to the speaker's podium It is important to list your name, address and the agenda item letter your comments refer to Comments are generally limited to 5 minutes per individual If you wish to speak concerning an item not on the agenda, you may do so under "Public Comments " There is opportunity to speak under this section pnor to the end of the agenda Any handouts for the Planning Commission should be given to the Planrnng Commission Secretary for distribution to the Commissioners All requests for items to be placed on a Planning Commission agenda must be in venting The deadline for submitting these items is 6 00 p m Tuesday, one week pnor to the meeting The Planning Commission Secretary receives all such items AVAILABILITY OF STAFF REPORTS Copies of the staff reports or other documentation to each agenda item are on file in the offices of the Planning Department, City Hall, located at 10500 Civic Center Dnve, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 These documents are available for public inspections dunng regular business hours, Monday through Thursday, 7 00 a m to 6 00 p m ,except for legal City holidays APPEALS Any interested party who disagrees with the Cary Planning Commission decision may appeal the Commission's decision to the City Council within 10 calendar days Any appeal filed must be directed to the City Clerk's Office and must be accompanied by a fee of $1,974 for maps and $2,073 for all other decisions of the Commission (Fees are established and governed by the City Council) Please turn off all cellular phones and pagers while the meeting is in session Copies of the Planning Commission agendas and minutes can be found at http llwww ci rancho-cucamoncta ca us 5 of 5 Vicinity Map ~ Planning Commission June 13, 2007 r ~ Meeting Location N City Hall 10500 Civic Center Drive • t_ 1 • \~ ~ 4F ~`,~~, , ~~; T H E C I T Y O F ~ .. x __.:_ it ~~ J.:~~ _ _ ..4z,~....__ir _ .,,_ __ r_ ~.._ _ ~... RANCHO C U C A M O N G A Staff Report DATE June 13, 2007 TO Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM James R Troyer, AICP, Planning Director BY Pei-Ming Chou, Associate Planner SUBJECT TIME EXTENSION FOR TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16072 - RICHLAND PINEHURST INC - A request for a time extension for a previously approved tentative tract map to subdivide 150 79 acres into 359 lots in the Low (2-4 dwelling units per acre) and Very-Low (0 1-2 dwelling units per acre) Residential Districts, with an average density of 2 3 dwelling units per acre for the entire project, in the Upper Etiwanda Neighborhood of the Etiwanda North Specific Plan, located at • northwest corner of Wilson Avenue and East Avenue APN 0225-083-01, 12, 13, 15, 16, and 20 Related Files Development Agreement DRC2002-00156, Annexation DRC2002-00865, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2003-00461 Staff found the project to be within the scope of the project covered by a prior Environmental Impact Report certified by City Council in June 16, 2004, by Resolution 04-204 and does not raise or create new environmental impacts not already considered in the Environmental Impact Report BACKGROUND The Planning Commission approved Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16072 on June 16, 2004, fora 3-year period This is the first request for a time extension There have been no changes to the City's development standards since these maps were approved This item was continued from the May 23, 2007 Planning Commission hearing due to an error in the legal advertisement ANALYSIS A Subdivision Map On January 6, 1999, the City Council amended the City's Subdivision Ordinance to establish a 3-year initial approval period for tract and parcel maps (increased from 2 years previously) The amendment also allows the Planning Commission to grant time extensions in 12-month increments for up to 5 years (a maximum of 8 years from the original time approval), which is the maximum allowed under the State Subdivision Map Act Section 66452 69 (e) The maximum life of this project would be up to 8 years from the date of approval (final expiration on June 16, 2012) B Environmental Assessment Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") • and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City certified an Environmental Impact Report on June 16, 2004, in connection with the City's approval of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16072 Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, no subsequent or supplemental EIR or Negative Declaration is required in connection with subsequent discretionary approvals of the same ITEM A PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TIME EXTENSION FOR SUBTT16072 - RICHLAND PINEHURST INC June 13, 2007 Page 2 • protect unless (i) substantial changes are proposed to the protect that indicate new or more severe impacts on the environment, (n) substantial changes have occurred m the circumstances under which the protect was previously reviewed that indicates new or more severe environmental impacts, or (iii) new important information shows the protect will have new or more severe impacts than previously considered, or (iv) additional mitigation measures are now feasible to reduce impacts or different mitigation measures can be imposed to substant-ally reduce impacts Staff has evaluated the time extension request and concludes that substantial changes to the protect or the circumstances surrounding the protect have not occurred, which would create new or more severe impacts than those evaluated m the previously certified EIR The proposed time extension request does not raise or create new environmental impacts not already considered in the Environmental Impact Reportforthe tract map Staff further finds that the protect will not have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previously certified EIR, not have more severe effects than previously analyzed, and that additional or different mitigation measures are not required to reduce the impacts of the protect to a level of less-than-significant The protect was developed with a development agreement for the 359-lot subdivision The Site Plan, building elevations, and development conditions for the proposed protect are included m the development agreement and are generally consistent with the Development Code and the Etiwanda North Specific Plan Therefore, pursuant to CEQA, staff recommends that the Planning Commission concur with the staff determination that no additional environmental review is required in connection with the City's consideration of the time extension CORRESPONDENCE This item was advertised as a public heanng m the Inland Valley Daily , Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 660-foot radius of the protect site RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission grant a 1-year time extension for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16072 through the adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval Respectfully submitted, ~• Ja s R Troyer, AICP Planning Director JRT PC/ge Attachments Exhibit A -Letter from Applicant Dated March 13, 2007 Exhibit B T Vicinity Map Exhibit C -Tentative Map Exhibit D -Initial Study Prepared by Michael Brandman Associates and Part II Addendum Draft Resolution of Approval for Time Extension for SUBTT16072 • A-2 RICH Ll~N D C O M M U N I T I E S • March 13, 2007 Ms Candyce Burnett Senior Planner City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 Tentative Tract Map No 16072 Request for Tentative Tract Map Extension of Time Dear Candyce We hereby request a time extension for Tentative Tract Map No 16072 to allow us time to complete the processing of ail of our environmental permits , Should you have any questions, please contact us • Sin erely, Jo n Schafer Senior Vice President ~ ~XFIIBIT A 4100 Newport Place • Suite 800 • Newport Beach, California 92660 • 949/261-7010 • Fax 949/261-7016 A-3 t `- _ ° - ~. i r _ s i\ ~ ~y f /J ~ )I , V i ~ a _ t~ t ~~ Ci _~~ ~ d ~~~; r ~~ t ~'~~ T~ ~ It ~~~ ~~ ,4 .-. - .._ t~ _ ` .I ~ ~Ji~~ ,, ~ ,.~~ ~~ ~+, ~ ~~jl ~__~ )ty~ ~ 1 _ _0_ ~' ', otl~„~ t ~j i1-- _ _ ~ ~'Il ' f~~; " ~~hrs~ ~^~~ ifs „~ . _ t +d' 850D ~£ .~-- ~~ ~ /.~ ~ ~ ~ t . w~ ~,.~ ~` r ' ~ r 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ _ 1 ' ~ ~ - t ~ '_, ' ; . _= ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~y ~. , ,r ~~\ r , --J' „ `_• ~~', : ~'' ~1 ~f\ ~ ~'- - - _~` - - ` ~~J~~'SI~, „~```~t jn5o; rr -- ~ ~ ~~ r r ~ it -~` '~~ ta1 ~ / s- ~1 ~` i%~ .; Sin emaNhtb l' tbF i Fo - `N rt' ' '1 "'`e ` ~ II ! .dY ~ ~ ~ " ~ I' ~ _ "~.r1~1 \ ~' ")-"• ~ i , } ~ 7a ~ ~ __ _ " ,i, .. - ~1 .. i t l\St'1 i/ \; `~ 1 ~ j '- ~ ~ a o n _ _ w ~ ~ ~ ~, - , /. On)vfl !; - h ~ ` ` ~~ +~ r ~ J t ~ / 5 ,~ ~y '" ~ ~ i _ - ~ l y l u ; f ~ ~ -,=/ 1 * 5 ~~ + .:.. _ _. -~' 'r, Yi ~ ~ ~ ~ ~.~- r~-~ 1 4~ ,, , . ~ .. +A __ r~ , `t , t -`, t 1 ~ / t \' Blurb 'r ` i .r .... ~ '~ ~ - , -`-... _ - ._..---^~-~ i ~ ~ ~ o ,.,. 1 /J ^ l~ti 4 rv r t - ` ~~~ r'-/~ _v `- NH.oMsa. - ~1~ '_' r 1... -` ,.. Ji'1 ~ ! ~ /tl ~ ! ti ~ _ _ - -- __-- ' ~ ~ - - _..^,.._/may---~ r _ / ' /~~`~_ - - ~ __'l Onyort _~ ~ 'e ~ Serii'O ~ J_ --- - -_ - J- _..- y~'.'-~'' '' - / ~ - _~:15G0 ~- - - - i2 i'tE+t r 1 ~ ^ t g n'1i b:_ ~ t, ss y f _ _ _ _ .,`t~, `., ' - ,~~ r t ~ _ -- @ivv«xle _ J r -. ,~ 1' Sf _,~, ~ ~, - ~~ 1 .f^ f • • S K O ~~ ~ Z RicLlsnd Communities, Inc ~~~ s~ 410o r+e.Port Plaee, sate aoo Newport Beach, G s2sso-t403 0 o a pn (sus) zst-~oto F~ rest 2st-pots EXHIBIT B TENTATIVE TRACT No. 16072 USGS QUADRANGLE VICINITY MAP CRY OF RANCHO CIJCAMONO/~ COUNTY OF SAN , 8TA1'E OF G41.FORNA A-4 sfluAC~ teas 7s Otuw, cucAMONOA ~Aic ~~~ a Nld e ~"!I i}7J ~ 1~~111 it yl ullli ~i11I~ ~ iii 1 1 I ~~41 ~1A 1, ~!5!!~ ~1587!!l177~p -I+I~~y~l+l~iill~'N~~T•~~ I1s!!!s!~ ~elsl~ Ipss!ln7~ 111111''' 911i1~g&1~~ III 3 L.1 III ~ ~~ ~~~yl ~Il~l~llili ~ IIII~ I~Illl~~li~ ~~ ~~ z ~ ~7aaslsl~'3+ls~ Ippss!!!,p ;_ ' ~ I 11161611BIellelAy~~lse~ J~ ~ I i ~ ` ,....I~~........,I~ ~flllllllllllllllllllll(~a, ~ I€~ 14 9 144 ......, ~ l~Ylili~l ~ial~I' i~ilel!!1 !9!lI93:~! !!4'~ip! 13ss ~~~ -.~" '" I t mle~l !I ~nan~f!1 ie~l Id ~ a F ~ ~' ! ~ I i ~~ r~ ~i~h rawuhll ~IoU (~~~11 lell ~113sa~11 ~gl~ill E~ls~Ji11 ~! Ea ~a I X17 ~ ~ I II 1 6~m-~.P r-F,- ~~ T--.. \ A+r I C-" F \ 111 I I I I A {I'C _\Yy~~' '1{1i~ li ., II ,~ ;,, s w M011 ~ ~ IQtt Y ; r , ~ ~ylptol ', „ iepn { Oll 1 II ~ 'ppld; v 7uAu ~, xE .!a 9 II l d00 ' ~ ° I{ +OR i `~ r r+ ~' i ~ ',, ~ ~~, t I t Bn +gu ~i r, Ed '"+9a, , s , ~~i ~glfA I a ~ n• gy ,lMtt ~ ~ ~ , 1 I , it ~ , p ~~ ~ '~~ ~ ~n9o ~I ~ 4 , i~1i trl ~fOll V1 [ . t I I~rt1, 7 II raft ''~I {! ~~F ~I~ ~ i ~ a'O 1 ~ ~~Tr ~ ` {~ 1 ~ r t ~A61i 1 a,i~ s ~ ~ ~ ~~{I ~d I ~ w~ t 1®A2 ' , ~~ .,w ' w ~'/ t ,~~ ~ ~f'~ F s;1 } ~~ t ~+,~ . ~1~~ ,I 1.tr ~„~ ~~t ~ .ntr ,~, , ~~II tM1IbPo~iar +ell `tkt 1~ -u' I i r ~ f ~ a"r+ y~ i., ~ 1~ r 1~ _ ~\ q~ It~r 'x '~. ~,• ~ ~,. r y ~ L' r ~~y _ i~ .~ .x 1• t ~ t ..Iy~sG~ i I .~i* ' ~t ~'i ~.,~'&!~.:a~ ~ f t "* +~,ItY I r= 6f K ~ ~ ~-~r''~'m.~:~.,, '~~t~~'3i~~ '"• v~~`,,~ ~k~, /4 `1 ~,~,.~.,a;-,~"'~-,~y e'~ ~'I e ;1t+ ~ ~- s a t I I ~I • ! ti~ I. a ~ t ~ a I ' (" u EXHIBIT C ~1 s , i J' @ '~""" ~ ~I ~~ r~~ ~~ ~~ I: ~; ~ ! ,I I Il,,,ee ~ ~, ~ ~ ~Ilill ~ ~~ ~ ~ ''~ I ~e~~j1 ~s . ~ ~ " ~ ~~ ~ it /% 1 s I ' ~ ' reifill~ F 1',~_ , r ~~t ~ ^S 4 1,,; II ~ ~ @7£ lil9f ~ ttIee a ~ _ _ II7I1 ~ ~'~ 3 ~ t III II h ii{~il .o:..! n IhN i ~~~ ~alld®~ s~~~ q ~ • • CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA INITIAL STUDY FOR TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NUMBER 16072 Prepared for• City of Rancho Cucamonga P 0 Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91729 Contact Catherine Johnson, AICP Associate Planner Prepared by: Michael Brandman Associates 621E Carnegie Dnve, Surte 100 San Bernardino, CA 92408 (909) 884-225 Contact Thomas J McGill, Ph D Regional Manager uioust trtnnowv. nswcu rvs September 2002 • +F • ~' EXHIBIT D L A-6 City of Rancho Cucamonga Inrhal Study for Tents, re Tract Map Number 16072 TABLE OF CONTENTS • 1 0 INTRODUCTION 1-1 11 Background 1-2 1 2 Project Description 1-2 1 3 Setting and Surrounding Land Uses 1-6 1 4 Purpose of the Initial Study 1-7 1 5 Environmental Factors Potentially Affected 1_g 16 Determination 1-9 2 0 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST 2-1 3 0 EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS 3-1 3 1 Discussion of Environmental Checklist 3.2 I Aesthetics 3-2 II Agriculture Resources 3-3 III Air Quality 3-3 IV Biological Resources 3-3 V Cultural Resources 3-6 VI Geology and Soils 3-7 VII Hazards and Hazardous Materials 3_g VIII Hydrology and Water Quality 3-10 IX Land Use and Planning 3-13 X Mineral Resources 3-14 XI Noise 3-14 • XII Population and Housing 3-15 XIII Public Services 3-1~ XIV Recreation 3.17 XV Transportation/Traffic 3-17 XVI Utilities and Service Systems 3-19 XVII Mandatory Findings of Significance 3-20 4 0 REFERENCES 4-1 LIST OF EXHIBITS Exhibit 1 Regional Location 1-3 Exhibit 2 Vicinity Location Map 1-4 Exhibit 3 Project Site Plan 1_~ LIST OF TABLES Table h Project Statistical Summary 1-6 J H Cl~ent100180027 i Table of Contents A-7 Crry ofRancho Cucamongc, InTttal Study for Tentu, ve Tract Map Number 16072 1.0 INTRODUCTION This form and the descriptive infonnation in the application package constitute the contents of an Initial Study pursuant to Section 15063 of the State of Cahfonua Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines and Appendix G (1998) The environmental checklist is located in Chapter 2, and the evaluation of environmental impacts is located in Chapter 3 1 Pro_lect Tale Initial Study for Tentative Tract Map Number 16072 2. Lead Agency Name and City of Rancho Cucamonga Address: P 0 Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91729 (909)477-2700 www ci rancho-Cucamonga ca us 3 Contact Name and Phone Catherine Johnson, AICP Number Associate Planner City of Rancho Cucamonga P 0 Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, Cahfomia 91729 (909)477-2700 Cathy ~ohnson(a~ci rancho-Cucamonga ca us 4 Project Location: Thomas Bros Map X73 Cucamonga Peak, California USGS Quadrangle Map (1996) Sections 21 T1N R6W SBBM 5. Project Sponsor: Richland Pinehurst, Inc 3 Imperial Promenade, Suite 150 Santa Ana, California 92707 (714)708-4740 6 Existing General Plan L, VL, FZ (Low, Very Low Density Residential and Fault (Specific Plan) Designation. Zone- Etiwanda North Specific Plan) 7 Existing Zoning. L, VL, FZ (Very Low and Low Density Residential and Fault Zone, Etiwanda North Specific Plan) 8 Description of Project See Following • • 9 Surrounding Land Uses and See Following Setting• 10 Other Public Agencies Whose May include, but not be limited to Approval May Be Regmred• U S Fish and Wildlife Service Cahfonua Department of Fish and Game Cahfonua Regional Water Quality Control Board, Santa Ana Region San Bernardino County Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) San Bernardino County Flood Control Dtstnct r~ ~J H Client\00180027 1-1 Introduction A-8 Rancho Irnhal Study for Tenta~ ~e Tract Map Number 16072 1.1 BACKGROUND • In 1992, the City of Rancho Cucamonga Etitivanda North Specific Plan (Specific Plan) established a master plan for the area that focused on maintaining the community's rural atmosphere by preserving historic ranchos, orchards, and wineries Many of the features discussed in the Specific Plan are now Incorporated in the City's recently updated General Plan The Specific Plan is currently the guiding document for planned development within the northern portion of the community of Etiwanda The Specific Plan focuses on a development plan that preserves the area's qualities through distmctwe architectural styling and low density housing to protect the area's rural, small community quality Key gu~delmes within the Specific Plan include mixed use and low-density development balanced with recreational and open space areas The City General Plan adds conservation areas in the North Etiwanda area to protect its unique natural resources and to provide buffer areas between urban communities and the San Bernardino National Forest 1.2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION The proposed project site is located on 150 8 acres north of Wilson Avenue and east of Etiwanda Avenue in unincorporated San Bernardino County and wrthm the City's Sphere of Influence • (Exhibits 1 and 2) This area is currently identified in the Specific Plan for Low-Density (fewer than two dwelling units to no more than four dwelling units per acre) to Very Low-Density housing (one to two dwelling units per acre) T'he project Tentative Tract Map Number 16072, will allow up to 359 detached single-farnily housing units on minimum lot sizes of 8,400 square feet The net density of the project is expected to equal 2 38 dwelling units per acre The proposed project would include annexation of Tentative Tract 16072 to the City of Rancho Cucamonga and inclusion into the City's General Plan The project site is currently vacant It is divided by the Red Hill Fault, which is proposed as a landscaped, open space trail connecting the Etiwanda Avenue Community Trail to East Avenue Street patterns will be designed following the naturally trending terrain, which slopes at about 6 percent from the northwest to the southeast In addition, the circulation system would provide for improvements to the existing streets along the perimeter of the project site, thereby serving as a link for the existing and proposed streets in the County and the City Internal landscaped slopes will be designed at various slope inclinations (2 1 maximum) to provide meandering of the tops and toes of the slopes Flood protection will be provided by the construction of the 25`h Street Diversion Channel (providing flood proofing for downstream parcels including onsite interim detention basins until improvements are complete adjacent to the Interstate 210 freeway) Exhibit 3 depicts the project site plan as proposed • H Client\00180027 1-2 Introduction A-9 NESPERIA San Bernardino County I 15 ` KEY MAP I PROJECT ~ u LOCATION ~ ,~ 3 ~ ~ .. .. . ~` E 1 I ~ .. s .} . j ~ r ~ ` ., ~ ., i ,,' ` , RANCHO „ ' ~, ~ <: { CUCAMON6A foNTANA ~ , wuTO - i ~i , . ~ ~ v 1.AS Ara~eles ~' ~' t i 4 , . A SAN Gtt nnty , o ,. ,. i V BERNAROMO r < { ~5 ~~ .. ~ ` 10 ' PDMONA r ~ t s ONTARIO ~ C.DLTON ~~ $~ . ~ ~ + ~ ,. ., _ fa. raoxrRr,.~vxu„ ~arw.a~nx+:,a.wroo.;~ani.~ nc~ xo. . ~ Y 3 ,# ~,xrrn„~ CHIMO FtII1G °2+ ` ` °~? ,r i vxcu~ ~ ~ t, ANAHEIM Hv ~ e Orange ' County ' a_> ,.y 4 iNNYrYi~ xw xJ4lxv}vvrAxN,U.`%~Tx~.v rxv xw'~?+tx 60 i ~ 4 v L N N x Rrvers~de County _ ~ . - A RIVERSIDE 91 j NORCO 3 MORENO VAk1EV 14 '$ f FERRIS • • ~~~~ ^^~~ Z \C,ch~cl Brandmin A.avluates EYh>bit 1 Regional Location • ~LSNRJ~PTdEXHIBR 1 PPR TENTATIVE TRACT NO 16072 -CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA A10 • DadM Pr • '~ ~ e d b ~, ~ $ ~pmM to ~.p S~ 9pbeny sw Car D Ym Sl a' 8We Dun Dr E y n w ceone sl k S a ~O ~aa U M Rd ev ana r o em ea aeparo rta Gaakaap•' Rd MeniemlAn WgnW Ave S. Naming day D/ B a S ~ l l ~ a a Em ' C t 6 S a wt.mesl 6 m LL ~ ur . 4 a Smd~agona St ~Ia WBY f'~'~r PO 3{ ~yv8w Qn ~~~~ PROJECT SITE ~P~ 4~ P Wllem Ave WaROn Ara ~a16 ~ `MtBYxG@4t ,~ ~. Preaa Dt w 2kd Sl Pe NMs Ln < ~+~ SummR Ave 371vat Seadle Q• ~ St StrMa A A e 3 e a' w ~ a w Navw St Vuyma 5t ~ '~~~Ya~ i Sen 6eDVOdo Dr C ~ n,~ ~p,'p ~ 3 O~ ~~` P% z~ `des ~~,~4v G" ~~q C ~~ ~ ~~~ 15 ~~~~ ~ ~ E,~ub1c 2 • ~~~~ Z looo 0 looo zooo Feet Vicinity Location Map 4Lcharl Brandman AsNtu~tes r TENTATIVE TRACT NO 16072 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CALIFORNIA A11 ,. ~;, *~ to- F~, - -F - ~'..."~'~ ~ f~ ` "~ ~' ~ ,^ t I ii /'~~^'^'`^~,.'~,~+` t`t ''+.~~\` J.~ ~ ~ / ''-".cam. ~.'+-' -ti } I "~ !U; ~ ~` s=~` !t! w`. ~~ ~?~ ' , r~ ~! ,:r' "\. . \. ~ ~ i; - i `. j_}. `„~; t T~i.,,,+, if ~~..~ 7~ , , ~ ,.::/,. i ~ `~ ~ .~r` ` \'t ~ ~:.~~ ~k!~r'~y,. ~ _ III ' ~ Z Q ~ P" ~ i ~~ + ~ ::~.~..1 Y ,~~ ~ ~.'.'`~.::' o ` r1+ t ~~', ~ i~`r~ 4 ~' t ~ ] ~ J" i':k +f W t i _ ~::% ~ ;~! ~ + ~, ~ w -:... a ~ + '.wry Z ? )'f ~ 'il ~ H ~ ~ ~ lid 'z _ t,~ ~/ :'~a. ^r,,.~ r ~` 1 ~\ ~+ ~ ~ : ~ j ~ t r/. i =Mi l t ~ %~ Q { 1 1 ~"-'_ ~ `'':, t _ :, ~.c \ ` ' /' vim-.., ~ "'C ~ `, i ~y_ ~ M _ --^~i-----_ ~ J,y` _ r!~ fir' WILSON AVENUE C~ ~~``~_~ ~~13'7 i\fschael Brandman Assoc~ate~ SCALE IN FEET 0 2500 5000 Exhibit 3 Project Site Plan F URACT 16W21F~(HIBIT 3 CDR TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO 16072 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA A12 • Cary of Rancho Cucamonga Initial Study for Tentaczve Tract Map Number 16072 Wastewater from the proposed project would be conveyed via the Etawanda Avenue Tnuilc Sewer and • the future East Avenue Trunk Sewer to the Inland Empire Utilities Agency wastewater treatment facilities Domestic water would be provided to the project site by the Cucamonga County Water Distnct (CCWD) Sohd waste collected from the proposed project would likely be disposed of at the Mad-Valley Landfill in the City of Rialto, the closest landfill to the prolect srte Table 1 below provides a statistical summary of the proposed project Although the proposed project could be developed an one large phase, there as the potential for development to occur m phases Regardless of whether the proposed project occurs an one or more phases, srte preparation and earthwork would occur at one time, with appropnate stone drauiage facilities installed to protect the graded areas until construction is completed Construction grading would follow the general form of the existing topography Earthwork cut and fill are antaccpated to balance onsrte, with total raw cut of approximately 1,000,000 cubic yards (cy) Table 1 Project Statistical Summary • • Land Use Acreage Percent Single-family Detached Residential 94 18 62 5 Fault Zone/Open Space Area/Intenm Detention Basin 13 24 8 78 Manufactured Open Space (Landsca ed) 8 31 5 45 Ca Flood Channel 3 10 2 06 Public Streets 31 97 21 21 Total 150.8 100 1 3 SETTING AND SURROUNDING LAND USES The project srte cs wrtlun the City's Sphere of Influence, wrthm the Specific Plan, adopted m 1992 The most prominent feature of the Etiwanda North area is open space, compnsed of about 3,000 acres of gently sloping relatively undisturbed, mature Raverscdean alluvial fan sage scrub (RAFSS) dominated by white sage The lower slopes of the San Gabnel Mountain foothills, approxamatel~ 1 700 acres, support pnmanly chaparral habitat Drainage courses throughout the Ettwanda North area support a vanety of habitats including oak, sycamore, walnut and other woodlands A umque feature of the area is an approximately 11-acre freshwater marsh located in the northwesterly portion of the area Open space is expected to remain a prominent feature of the Etiwanda North area, even after development occurs and as supported by aloes-density residential land use pattern H Client100180027 1-6 Introduction A-13 Czty of Rancho Cucamonga Inrttal Study for Tenta~rve Tract Map Number 16072 The 150 8 protect site is relatively flat, sloping to the southeast at an approximately six percent grade Elevations range from approximately 1,800 feet above mean sea level (msl) at the northern boundary • to approximately 1,600 feet above msl at the southeastern comer of the protect site There are two ephemeral drainages on the site that convey water flows from the northwest to the southeast and merge with a defined flood control channel offstte to the east (East Etiwanda Creek) There are three other minor drainages on the protect srte The site is currently vacant Four potential historic resources have been previously identified on the protect srte They include a power generation facility, a water system, and an abandoned residence and the remains of low stone walls in the northwest portion of the site A cultural resources assessment will be conducted to assess their significance The findings will be included in the EIR Primary existing vehicular access to the protect srte is provided via Etiwanda Avenue, which runs along the western boundary, East Avenue to the east and Wilson Avenue along the southern boundary (Exhibit 2) Existing surrounding land uses include a residential development and Etiwanda Avenue to the immediate west, the CCWD treatment facility to the south and the Southerly Southern California Edison (SCE) power line comdor to the immediate north North of SCE power line comdor and proposed protect site is the location of a proposed 168 8-acre Tracy residential development site • Vacant land and the East Etiwanda Creek are located to the east 1 4 PURPOSE OF THE INITIAL STUDY This Initial Study was prepared as the first step in the environmental documentation process for the proposed protect The purpose of the Initial Study is to identify the appropriate issues that will be addressed in detail in the subsequent protect EIR To accomplish this, the Initial Study evaluates the extent to which the protect will produce potentially significant impacts in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) The obtective of the Initial Study is to identify both 1) those environmental issues that need not be further evaluated, and 2) those key environmental issues for which further analysis in the protect EIR is necessary The subsequent protect-specific EIR that will be prepared for this protect can be used by the City of Rancho Cucamonga not only for approval of the protect but also for the adoption of a development agreement and to support the annexation process with the Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) • H CLent\00180027 1-7 Introduction A14 City of Rancho Cucamonga Initial Study for Tenta~. ire Tract Map Number 16072 • • 1 5 ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving impacts that are "Potentially Significant" as indicated by the checklist in Chapter 2 ^ Aesthetics ^ Agncultuia.l Resources ^ ?.ir Quality ^ Biological Resources ^ Cultural Resources ^ Geology and Soils ^ Hazards and Hazardous ^ Hydrology and Water Quality ^ Land Use and Planning Matenals ^ Mineral Resources ^ Noise ^ Population and Housing ^ Public Services ^ Recreation ^ Transportation and Traffic ^ Utilities and Service Systems ^ Mandatory Fmdiigs of Significance H Client\00180027 1-8 Introduction A-15 City of Rancho Cucamonga Initial Study for Tentative Tract Map Number 16072 16 DETERMINATION On the bases of this initial evaluation ^ I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared ^ I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions m the project have been made by or agreed to by the project proponent A MITIGATED NEGATNE DECLARATION will be prepared ^ I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT will be prepared ^ I find that the proposed protect MAY have a `potentially significant impact" or "potentially significant unless mitigated" impact on the environment But at least one effect (a) has been adequately analyzed m an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and (b) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as descnbed on attached sheets An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed ^ I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or rrutigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project, nothing further is required / ' Signature Date ' Cathenne Johnson, AICP City of Rancho Cucamonga Pnrited Name r, ~ TN `,~ , ~ ~ c ~ o iy ~, ~ ~,~,_., For • • C7 H Client\00180027 1-9 Introduction A16 City of Rancho Cucamonga Initial Study for 7entahve Tract Number 16072 • 2.0 ENVIItONMENTAL CHECKLIST • • .Less Than ENVIROIYIVIENTAL ISSUES Potentially 3igmficant Less Thaa Significant Wtth Significant No T. AESTxETTcs -- Would the protect Impact IvIittgahon Impact Impact - a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic ^ ^ ^ ^ vista b) Substantially damage scenic resources, ^ ^ ^ ~ including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historc bu1ldiilgs within a state scenic highway c) Substantially degrade the existing visual ^ ^ ^ ^ character or quality of the site and Its surroundmgs~ d) Create a new source of substantial light or ^ ^ p ^ glare that would adversely affect day or nighttime views In the area TI. AGRICULTURE 1ZESOURCE5. -- Would the pra~ect [In detennirung whether impacts to agncultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the Califonua Agncultural Land Evaluatron and Site Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the California Dept of Conservation as an optional model to use m assessing mZpacts on agn culture and farmland) a) Convert Pnme Farmland, Unique Farmland, ^ ^ ^ ^ or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Momtonng Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agncultural used b) Conflict with existing zoning for agncultural ^ ^ ^ ^ use, or a W1111amson Act contract c) Involve other changes in the existing ^ ^ ^ ^ environment which, due to their location or nature, could result In conversion of Fannland to non-agnculhiral used H CLent\00180027 2-1 Environmental Checklist A17 City of Rancho Cucamonga Initial Study for Tentative Tract Number 16072 .Less Than EN~'rTT2,Q1`1~L,NTAL TSSTJES Potent,ally Slgmficant Less Than ~tgmfiaant With Ssga[fcant Na TII. AII2 QUAI,LTY -- Would the project Impact IvI*+~on Impact Impact [Where available, the significance cntena established by the applicable au quality management or au pollution control distract may be relied upon to make the following detennuiations] a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of ^ ^ ^ ^ the applicable air quality plan b) Violate any air quality standard or contnbute ^ ^ ^ ^ substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net ^ ^ ^ ^ increase of any cntena pollutant for which the project region is non-attainrrient under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions that exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors) d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial ^ ^ ^ ^ pollutant concentrations e) Create objectionable odors affecting a ^ ^ ^ ^ substantial number of people 1V. BTOLOGICAL RESOURCES. -- Would the project a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either ^ ^ ^ ^ directly or through habitat modifications on any species identified as a candidate, sensrtrve or special status species m local or regional plans policies, or regulations, or by the Califonva Department of Fish and Game or U S Fish and Wildlife Service b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any ^ ^ ^ ^ npanan habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the Califonua Department of Fish and Game or U S Fish and Wildlife Service ri Client\00180027 2-2 Environmental Checkltst • • A18 City of Rancho Cucamonga Initial Study for Tentative Tract Number 16072 • • Less Than ENVIRQl~1V~[ENTAL L~SUES PoEentiall~+ 5igxt~finant Less Than significant Wtth S~ficant No Impact Ivitfigation Impact Impact c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally ^ ^ ^ ^ protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc ) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means d) Interfere substantially wrth the movement of ^ ^ ^ ^ any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or wrth established native resident or migratory wildlife comdors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery srtes~ e) Conflict wrth any local policies or ordinances ^ ^ ^ ^ protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted ^ ^ ^ ^ Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local regional, or state habitat conservation plan V CULTURALRESOLJRCES -- W©uld the project a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the ^ ^ ^ ^ significance of a histoncal resource as defined in §1064 5~ b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the ^ ^ ^ ^ significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to § 1 ~ 064 ~ ~ c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique ^ ^ ^ ^ paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature d) Disturb any human remains, including those ^ ^ ^ ^ interred outside of formal cemeteries H Client\00180027 2-3 Environmental Checklist A19 City of Rancho Cucamonga Initial Study for Tentative Tract Number 16072 Less Than ENVII2,Ql~1MENTAL ISSUES Pdtantially S~gmficant L,esS'I'han STgmlicant With S~t;catrt Na VI. G~or.,oGY AND S©~I,S. -- Would the proposal Impact lvtit~gaLon Impact Impact a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the nsk of loss, m~ury, or death involving i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as ^ ^ ^ ^ delineated on the most recent Alquist-Pnolo Earthquake Fault Zoning map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a know fault Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42 u) Strong seismic ground shakings ^ ^ ^ ^ ui) Seismic-related ground failure, including ^ ^ ^ ^ hquefaction~ iv) Landshdes~ ^ ^ ^ ^ b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of ^ ^ ^ ^ topsoih c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is ^ ^ ^ ^ unstable, or that would become unstable as a - result of the project, and potentially result in on-site or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in ^ ^ ^ ^ Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial nsks to life or property e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting ^ ^ ^ ^ the use of septic tanks of alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater • • H Client\00180027 2-4 Environmental Checklist A 20 City ofRancho Cucamonga Initial Study for 1 entative Tract Number 16072 • • Less 'Chan ~i'l~1VI~.01~11~1~1~'1~.I~ ~~'~~ Potentially S~gmfiraat Less Than SzgtuficarR. Wrth Sigcuficant hIa impact Ivirtigahon Impact Impact VIII ~IAZA~DS AN~3i~Ar2D©IIS M,ATERFAIS. -- V~ould the protect a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the ^ ^ ^ ^ environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous matenals~ b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the ^ ^ ^ ^ environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous ^ ^ ^ ^ or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school d) Be located on a site which is included on a list ^ ^ ^ ^ of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 6962 ~ and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment e) For a protect located within an airport land use ^ ^ ^ ^ plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the protect result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the protect area f) For a protect within the vicinity of a private ^ ^ ^ ^ airstrip, would the protect result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the protect area g) Impair implementation of or physically ^ ^ ^ ^ interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk ^ ^ ^ ^ of loss, intury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adtacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intennuxed with wildlands~ H Client\00180027 2-5 Environmental Checklist A21 Crty of Rancho Cucamonga Initial Study for Tentative Tract Number 16072 ENVI~2,C~N1~E1'~ITA.I. I~STIES PotantiaTly Stgntf cant Impact VIII. H~ROI.UGY A1VD WATER QUALITY. -- Would the pro3ect a) Violate any water quality standards or waste ^ discharge requirements ~ b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or ^ interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit m aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e g , the production rate ofpre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level that would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permrts have been granted) c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern ^ of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, m a manner that would result in substantial erosion or siltation on-site or off-srte~ d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern ^ of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, m a manner which would result In flooding on- srte or off-srte~ e) Create or contribute runoff water that would ^ exceed the capacity of existing or planned storinwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted nmoff~ f) Otherwise substantially degrade water qualrty~ ^ g) Place housing wrtlun a 100-year flood hazard ^ area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Raze Map or other flood hazard delineation maps h) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area ^ structures that would impede or redirect flood flows Sig[[Ificaat L,esS'rhan Wrth signtficatft Mshgateon Impact ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ No • npact o ~ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ • H CLent\00180027 2-6 Environmental Checklist A 22 Ctty of Rancho Cucamonga Inthal Study for 7entattve Tract Number 16072 u • • Less Than ENVIRONIVI'ENTa1L ISSTJES Potentrally S~gmfinant LesS'rhaa Sigrufrcant Wtth S~gntficant Na Impact MrtLgatton .impact Impact i) Expose people or structures to a significant ^ ^ ^ ^ nsk of loss, intury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or damp ~) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow~ ^ ^ ^ ^ IX. LAND USE AND PLAi~1NIlYG. -- Wquid flit; project a) Physically divide an established community ^ ^ ^ ^ b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, ^ ^ ^ p policy, or regulation of an agency with tunsdiction over the protect (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effects - c) Conflict with any applicable habitat ^ ^ ^ ^ conservation plan or natural community conservation plan X. MINERAi. RES©URCES. -- Would the project a) Result in the loss of availability of a known ^ ^ ^ ^ mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally ^ ^ ^ ^ important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan XI. No1SE. -- Would the protect result in a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise ^ ^ ^ ^ levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies b) Exposure of persons to or generation of ^ ^ ^ ^ excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels H Client\00180027 2-7 Envtronmental Checkltst A 23 City of Rancho Cucamonga Iratral Study for Tentatzve Tract Number 16072 Less Than ENVIR©NI~ENfiAL ISSUES Potentihlly $~gtnfioant Less Thaa SYgntficaxtt W~fh Stga-#ioant No Impact Ivittigation ImFaat Impact c) A substantial permanent Increase in ambient ^ ^ ^ ^ noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the pro~ect~ d) A substantial temporary or penodic increase in ^ ^ ^ ^ ambient noise levels m the project vlcinrty above levels existing without the pro~ect7 e) For a project located within an airport land use ^ ^ ^ ^ plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels fl For a project within the vicinity of a pnvate ^ ^ ^ ^ airstnp, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels XII. POPULATION AND HOUSING. -- Vl7ould the project a) Induce substantial population growth in an ^ ^ ^ ^ area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or Indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other irifrastructure) ~ b) Displace substantial numbers of eaistmg ^ ^ ^ ^ housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere c) Displace substantial numbers of people, ^ ^ ^ ^ necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere H Client\00180027 2-g Environmental Checklist • • C7 A 24 Ctty of Rancho Cucamonga Inrhal Study for Tentatrve Tract Number 16072 • • Less Than ' ~NVII2,ON11~EN~AL ISSUES Potentially Sigml,nant Less Than Significant Wtth Significant Ida Isnpae} Miftgation Impact Impact VIII. PitB~Z+C SER~TCES. -- Would the project a) Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services Fire protections ^ ^ ^ ^ Police protections ^ ^ ^ ^ Schools ^ ^ ^ ^ Parks ^ ^ ^ ^ Other public facilrties~ ^ ^ ^ ^ HIV R~CREATYON. -- a) Would the project increase the use of existing ^ ^ ^ ^ neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated b) Does the project include recreational facilities ^ ^ ^ ^ or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities that might have an adverse physical effect on the environment H Client\00180027 2-9 Environmental Checklist A 25 City of Rancho Cucamonga Initral Study for Tentative Tract Number 16072 Less Than E1~R4N1VJCENT'A,L LSSUES - Potentially S9gmficanL Less Than 5tgmficant Wxfh S~gmficant Ida Impact hlr`hgaLon Impact Impact XV, TRANSPORTttTIbNI'T.ItA~FT.C. -- Would the pra~ect a) Cause an increase in traffic that is substantial ^ ^ ^ ^ in relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (i e , result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle tnps, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at mtersections)~ b) Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a ^ ^ ^ ^ level of service standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or lughways~ c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, ^ ^ ^ ^ including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety nsks~ d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design ^ ^ ^ feature (e g , sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e g , faun equipment) e) Result in inadequate emergency access ^ ^ ^ ^ f) Result in inadequate parking capacity ^ ^ ^ ^ g) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or ^ ^ ^ ^ programs supporting alternative transportation (e g ,bus turnouts, bicycle racks) XVI. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. -- Would the project a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of ^ ^ ^ ^ the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board b) Require or result in the construction of new ^ ^ ^ ^ water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects H Client\00180027 2-10 Environmental Checklist • • • A 26 Crty of Rancho Cucamonga Initial Study for 7 entahve Tract Number 16072 • Ixss Than ENVTIE2,C1~tMENTAL ISSiTES Potentially S;gmfie~t Less Than 3igntficant ltrifh Swnrl'icant No irnpa~t Ivirt~~altpn Impact Impact c) Require or result in the construction of new ^ ^ ^ ^ stone water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects d) Have sufficient water supplies available to ^ ^ ^ ^ serve the project from existing entitlements and resource, or are new and expanded entitlements needed e) Result in a determination by the wastewater ^ ^ ^ ^ treatment provider that serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient ^ ^ ^ ^ permitted capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs g) Comply with federal state, and local statutes ^ ^ ^ ^ and regulations related to solid waste XVII. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SFGNIFICANCE. -- a) Does the project have the potential to degrade ^ ^ ^ ^ the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restnct the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the mayor penods of California history or prehistory H Client\00180027 2-11 Environmental Checklist A 27 Crty of Rancho Cucamonga Initial Study for Tentative Tract Number 16072 ~~ El~t~''IR~TIIV.CDNTAj., IS3TJES b) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively constderable~ ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future pro~ects)~ c) Does the project have environmental effects that will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly` Pdtantial~y S~gmficant lass Thad 3tgntflcant Wtth Significant i~ia Impact Ivfxftgahon Impact Itnpa ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ O • • • H Client\00180027 2-12 Errvironmental Checklist A 28 City of Rancho Cucamonga Initial Study for Tentative Tract Number 16072 3.0 EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IlVIPACTS An Environmental Checklist Form is used to evaluate the potential environmental impacts associated with a project A bnef explanation is provided for all answers except No Impact answers that are adequately supported by the information sources A No Impact answer is adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to projects like the one involved (e g ,the project falls outside a fault rupture zone) A No Impact answer should be explained where it is based on project-specific factors as well as general standards (e g ,the project would not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants, based on a project-specific screening analysis) Once the City of Rancho Cucamonga (lead agency) has determined that a particular physical impact may occur, then the checkhst answers must indicate whether the impact is potentially significant, less than significant with mitigation, or less than significant Potentially Significant Impact is appropnate if there is substantial evidence that an effect may be significant If there are one or more potentially significant impacts, a detailed analysis is required to determine if there are feasible mitigation measures to reduce the potentially significant impact to less than significant If the impact cannot be reduced to less than significant, an unavoidable significant unpact would occur and an environmental impact report (EIR) would be required Less Than Sigraficant with Mitigation applies where the incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from a potentially significant impact to a less than significant impact The City must descnbe the mitigation measures, and bnefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level The Environmental checkhst Form has been used to assist in the review of environmental effects of the proposed project with respect to the following resources ^ Aesthetics, ^ Agnculture Resources, ^ Air Quality, ^ Biological Resources, ^ Cultural Resources, ^ Land Use and Planning, ^ Mineral Resources, ^ Noise, ^ Population and Housing, ^ Public Services, ^ Geology and Soils, Recreation, ^ Hazards and Hazardous Matenals, Transportation and Traffic, and ^ Hydrology and Water Quality, Utilities and Service Systems Responses to the checklist questions are provided in the following sections • H CLent\00180027 3-1 Evaluation of Environmentallmpaets A 29 City of Rancho Cucamonga Initial Study for 1 entatrve Tract Number 16072 3 1 DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST • I AESTHETICS a Potentially Significant Impact. Panoranuc views of the San Bernarchno National Forest and the San Gabnel Mountains to the north and Etiwanda Creek to the east of the site represent scenic vistas The San Gabnel-Mountains are recognized within the General Plan as the City's most prominent feature and provides a scenic backdrop to the community Scenic views rnight be obstructed by the proposed development This site also provides panorairuc views of the City and valley Effects of visual impacts will be further evaluated in the EIR b No Impact. The proposed project site is located approximately 1 5 miles from the Interstate 15 freeway and the new Interstate 210 freeway Neither one of these roadways is designated as a scenic highway in the area No significant effects will, therefore, occur to scenic resources vcnthm a state scenic highway c Potentially Significant Impact The proposed project is located within the North Etiwanda Open Space and Habitat Preservation Program (NEOSHPP) area The NEOSHPP area was established by the County of San Bernardino to encourage retention of open space and protect sensitive biological resources Although the NEOSHPP is a voluntary program that has never • been fully implemented, rt does establish guidelines to conserve scenic and valuable habitat m a region considered to be one of the nation's fastest growing housing markets The visual character of the site is of a gentle slope from the northwest to the southeast at an approximate grade of six percent, on the Etiwanda Alluvial Fan on the southern slope of the San Gabnel Mountains The site is covered with native vegetation and a blue line stream traverses the site from the northwest corner to the southwest comer A prominent ndge, known as the Etiwanda Avenue Scarp, traverses the project site m a northeasterly to easterly direction The proposed project has the potential to alter the visual character of the site by development of residential housing m an otherwise undisturbed area The EIR will examine the significance of changes to the visual character of the site and surrounding properties as well as consistency with the visual goals of the NEOSHPP, Specific Plan and City General Plan d Potentially Significant Impact. The proposed project consists of up to 3~9 single-family detached houses on 150 8 gross acre site Street lights will be installed on the new streets Street lights m combination with residential lighting and lights from nighttime vehicular travel will create a new source of light in the area Potential significant effects from new sources of light and glare will be further evaluated m the EIR • H Client\00180027 3-2 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts A 30 City of Rancho Cucamonga Initial Study for Tentative Tract Number 16072 II. AGRICULTURE RESOURCES • a, c No Impact. The project site is located within the Low to Very Low Density Residential Districts within the Etiwanda North Specific Plan, which does not penmrt agricultural uses The project site has not been identified as, and will not convert prime farmland, unique farmland, or farmland of statewide importance to non-agricultural use No impact on agriculture resources will occur b No Impact Williamson Act contracts have not been executed for lands surrounding the project, no conflicts with a Williamson Act contract will occur III AII2 QUALITY a-e Potentially Significant Impact According to the General Plan EIR, the City is located in an area where ozone levels exceed state and federal standards and where PM10 (particulate matter less than 10 microns in size) frequently exceed state standards (54 6 %) and occasionally exceed federal standards (3 3%) An additional 359 single-family residential amts will be added as a result of this project This increased land use intensity will result in additional vehicle trips as well as stationary source emissions Air quality impacts will be • evaluated in the EIR based on significance criteria provided by the South Coast Air Quality Management District Emissions from construction activities including dust from grading, and from operational emissions generated by the proposed land use revision will be evaluated in an air quality study conducted for the proposed project Minor quantities of other emissions associated with the use of natural gas for space and water heating and the production of electricity for onsite use, as well as landscape maintenance emissions and consumer aerosol products will also be included The au quality analysis included m the EIR will also provide a consistency review against the General Plan as well as the goals of the Air Quality Management Plan IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES a Potentially Significant Impact The project site is within the known range of the federally- hsted threatened coastal California gnatcatcher (CAGN) (Poboptila californrca californica) and the federally-listed endangered San Bernardino kangaroo rat (SBKR) (Dipodomys merriami parvus) Focused surveys were conducted to ascertain the presence or absence of the CAGN by PCR Services Corporation in 2001 and 2002 Both CAGN surveys were negative Focused surveys for the SBKR will be conducted in Summer 2002 A sensitive plant survey was also conducted by PCR in 2001 The findings of the surveys will be • incorporated into the EIR, the technical reports will be included m their entirety m the EIR H Client\00180027 3-3 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts A31 Cyty of Rancho Cucamonga Inytial Study for Tentative Tract Number 16072 Appendices If any listed species are found to be present onsite, the EIR well identify the . appropnate mitigation necessary to satisfy both CEQA and State and Federal Endangered Species Act (ESA) regulations Other resources that may suffer a significant impact are birds of prey, which are protected under California Department of Fish and Game (CDFG) codes 3503 and 3503 5 The project site contains several large trees for nesting as well as foraging habitat for several species of raptors, including, but not limited to, red-tailed hawk* (Buteo ~amaycensys), ferruginous hawk (Buteo regalrs), Cooper's hawk* (Accyprter cooperyr), golden eagle (Aquyla chrysaetos), red- shouldered hawk* (Buteo lrneatus), northern hamer* (Crrcus cyaneus) and Amencan kestral* (falco sparveryus) (*Denotes these species were observed onsite ) CDFG has listed some species as "species of concern" in California Some of these species were observed on the project site These include logger-headed shnke (Lynrus ludovycranus), Cooper's hawk (nesting), northern hamer (nestmg), southern California rufous-crowned sparrow (Armophrla ruficeps canescens), Bell's sage sparrow (Amphrsprza belly belly), Plummer's manposa lily (Calochortus plummerae), and California black walnut (Juglans calrfornrca) A large population of Plummer's manposa lily occurs on the project site and development of this site could significantly impact that species Potential impacts to biological resources will also be balanced against the Specific Plan • Development Framework, City of Rancho Cucamonga's General Plan Conservation Element as well as the goals and policies of the County's General Plan Natural Resources Element, the County's North Etiwanda Preserve and its NEOSHPP conservation open space program b c Potentially Significant Impact The project site and vicinity supports relatively undisturbed, mature Riversidean alluvial fan sage scrub (RAFSS) dominated by white sage This plant community is considered sensitive by the CDFG The EIR will provide further evaluation of the impacts associated with the direct loss of 100+ acres of RAFSS on the project site, the indirect impacts expected to occur from extending infrastructure onto the project site and the cumulative loss of RAFSS based on the approval of the project as well as other projects in the vicimty (e g , the Tracy Development, the Rancho Etiwanda Estates Development and the University/Crest Project) The project site was once an active alluvial fan receiving flow from upstream water sources as well as providing natural watercourses dunng flood events Flood control facilities constructed by the County have eliminated most of the previously occumng natural watercourses onsrte and in the vicinity A ~unsdictional delineation was conducted on the project site by PCR m September 1998 to determine the U S Army Corps of Engineers (USAGE) and CDFG • H CLent\00180027 3-4 Evaluation of Envrronmental Impacts A 32 City of Rancho Cucamonga Initial Study for Tentative Tract Number 16072 • ~unsdictional areas Two ~unsdictional drainages were found The 1998 ~unsdictional delineation report will be updated and included in the EIR Appendices The findirigs will be incorporated Into the EIR's biological resources section d Less Than Significant Impact. The project site does not contain watercourses that support fish Although the vicinity of the project site is adjacent to undeveloped areas to the north, areas east, south and west of the project site are developed The project site, therefore, does not provide regional movement for wildlife species and does not link large open space areas for wildlife species No significant impacts to the movement of any fish or wildlife species and wildlife corndors, therefore, would occur However localized wildlife movement may be impeded by the development The project will not impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites e Less Than Significant with Mitigation Trees that have been identified on sit include blue gum Eucalyptus, Peruvian pepper tree, olive tree silk tree and Southern California black walnut The City of Rancho Cucamonga has a local tree preservation ordinance that requires a City permit to remove any tree over 15-feet high and 1~-inches in circumference Any trees that meet these specifications will be identified dunng the biological studies conducted for the proposed project, and mitigated according to City requirements • Section 89 0510 of the County of San Benaardino Development Code has a native plant protection ordinance, that provides "The removal of any vegetation within two hundred (200) feet of the bank of a stream or in an area indicated as a protected npanan area on an overlay map or Specific Plan, shall be subject to a tree or plant removal permit "The ordinance further provides that " streams include those shown on United States Geological Survey Quadrangle topographic maps as perennial or intermittent, blue or brown Imes (solid or dashed), and nver wash areas " The Cucamonga Peak USGS Map identifies the area as having a blue line stream traversing the project site However, flood control facilities constructed subsequent to the preparation of the USGS map, have changed the area's drainage course and restncted it to the new channels As a result, the vegetation in the area has been affected due to the removal of the upstream water source and represents a clear exception to the ordinance In addition, the change m the histonc drainage course has modified existing vegetation from npanan to RAFSS dominated by white sage Therefore, the removal of the existing vegetation is not expected to result m a significant impact to npanan vegetation • H Client\00180027 3-5 Evaluation of Environmentallmpacts A 33 City of Rancho Cucamonga Initral Study for Tentative Tract Number 16072 f Potentially Significant Impact. In 1992, the Etiwanda North Specific Plan (Specific Plan) established a master plan for the project area that focused on maintauung the community's . rural atmosphere by preserving its histonc ranchos, orchards, and winenes Many of the features discussed in the Specific Plan are now incorporated in the City's recently updated General Plan The Specific Plan is currently the guiding document for planned development within the northern portion of the community of Etiwanda Key guidelines within the Specific Plan include mixed use and low-density development balanced with recreational and open space areas The City General Plan adds conservation areas in the North Etiwanda area to protect its unique natural resources and to provide buffer areas between urban communities and the San Bernardino National Forest The North Etiwanda area is also recognized as a vital resource for the preservation of native plant and animal species through the guiding pnnciples stated in the County of San Bemardirio's North Etiwanda Open Space Habitat Preservation Program (NEOSHPP) The NEOSHPP's main focus is on the preservation of rare and endangered species It also addresses concerns wrath providing visually pleasing natural open spaces and recreational opportunities to the surrounding community Although the NEOSHPP is a voluntary program that has never been fully implemented, it does establish guidelines to conserve scenic and valuable habitat in a region considered to be one of the nation's fastest growing housing markets The EIR will provide further analysis to assess the project's consistency with the Specific Plan and NEOSHPP in terms of habitat conservation/preservation V. CULTURAL RESOURCES a-c Potentially Significant Impact Known archaeological sites have been recorded in the vicinity of the project site The Gabnelino Indians were also known to occupy the Etiwanda area, hence, Native American artifacts could be present onsite The project is located m Etiwanda, a community formed in the late 1800s when water nghts were developed George and William Chaffey purchased land and water nghts and established the "Etiwanda Colony Lands," a planned colony consisting of approximately 1,900 acres of agncultural land The Colony was subdivided into 10 acres lots and a flume and clay pipe system distnbuted water to the individual landowners from Day and East canyons Four potential histonc resources have been previously identified on the project site They include a power generation facility, a water system, and an abandoned residence and the remains of low stone walls in the northwest portion of the site A thorough record review and site reconnaissance will be conducted to • H Client\00180027 3-6 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts A 34 Cary of Rancho Cucamonga Initial Study for Tentative Tract Number 16072 • Identify and evaluate the potential for cultural resources to occur The findings will be Included in the EIR The EIR well provide a complete discussion of the findings of the cultural assessment and the technical report will be included m Its entirety In the EIR Appendices Should no visible histoncal, cultural and/or paleontologic resources be observed as a result of site surveys, the EIR will still identify measures to be followed should sub-surface resources be discovered dunng construction activities These procedures may include, but not be limited to stopping work and diverting earth-disturbing acnvrties elsewhere, and retaining a qualified archaeologist or paleontologist to assess and recover the resources d Potentially Significant Impact. The potential presence of bunal sites will be assessed dunng the cultural assessment Should the project site contain human remains, the EIR will include the appropnate mitigation to ensure that no unpacts occur to these resources Further, the EIR will identify measures to be taken in the event human remains are encountered dunng construction These measures will be consistent with the State Health and Safety Code 7050 5 VI GEOLOGY AND SOILS • a-d Potentially Significant Impact. The 150 8-acre site Is bisected In a northeasterly to easterly direction by the Red HiIU Etiwanda Avenue fault which m this area is known to be active This portion of the fault corresponds with a prominent scarp in the alluvial fan, known as the Etiwanda Avenue Scarp, which Is the result of the displacement of recent alluvial deposits, and is included In an Alquist-Pnolo Special Studies Zone The site is also located near the Cucamonga and San Jacinto faults, both active and capable of generating moderate to large- sized earthquakes that would cause strong ground shaking In the area Other faults nearby also have the potential to cause strong ground shaking Given its location at the base of the San Bernardino Mountains, the project site is also susceptible to debns flows and flooding dunng intense precipitation events Oversized matenals (boulders) will also be exposed dunng grading which will need to be buned under engineenng controls or otherwise disposed of appropriately Other geologic issues Include, but are not limited to, earthquake-induced liquefaction and slope Instability, soils, and ~tiind erosion A Geologic/Fault Investigation was conducted for the proposed project site by GeoSoils Inc in October 1998 and updated In November 2000 and July 2002 A review of other pertinent, readily available reports and maps on the geologv and seismicity of the area, including the Technical Background Report to the City s General Plan Safety Element will also be • conducted for the preparation of the EIR An analysis will be included in the EIR of the H Client\00180027 3-7 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts A 35 City of Rancho Cucamonga Initial Study for Tentative Tract Number 16072 estimated magnitude and duration of strong ground shaking that can be expected at the site • from the largest earthquake caused by each of the mayor active and potentially active faults within a 60-mile radius In addition, data obtained by reviewing stereoscopic aerial photographs for landfonns that may be indicative of faulting, and evidence of historic floods that may have previously impacted the site will be discussed The data obtained from the literature, map and photo review will be compiled onto a baseline map and included in the EIR The compiled seismic, geologic and flooding data will be analyzed to assess which portions of the site are at risk from the hazards identified, and to evaluate the potential constraints that these hazards may pose on the proposed project Where appropriate, remedial measures that could be implemented to mitigate the hazards and constraints will be identified in the EIR At a minimum, the project proponent will be required to include the direction and setback distance of the building setback line on the site grading plan(s) Final project plans should also be reviewed by GeoSoils, Inc prior to construction. in order to assure construction is in accordance with the geologic/fault investigation report e No Impact. The proposed project does not involve the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems No impacts associated with these facilities will, therefore, occur • VII HA?•ARnS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS a-b Less Than Significant Impact. There are no existing Superfund sites within the City There are 24 large quantity (greater than 1,000 kilograms per month) generators within the City including chemical manufacturers, electroplating companies, or petroleum refineries There are 74 small quantity (between 100 and 1,000 kilograms per _nonth) generators within the City including dry-cleaning, auto repair shops, and photo processing centers There are two potentially un-remediated leaking underground storage tanks in the City The transportation of hazardous wastes/materials on freeways and mayor arterial roadways poses flash point (fire) and explosive potential In addition, trucks using these roadways may transport solid, liquid, and/or gaseous material of varying toxicity Restrictions placed on the transport of hazardous waste/materials include the avoidance (unless no other satisfactory route exists) of heavily populated areas, limitations on access to budges and tunnels, and a 1-mile-wide zone limitation along freeways for access to fuel and services The disposal of hazardous waste is also highly regulated The project does not include uses which are likely to create any health hazards, or result in accidental explosions or release of • H Client\00180027 3-8 Evaluation of Environmentallmpacts A 36 Crty of Rancho Cucamonga Initial Study for Tentative Tract Number 16072 • hazardous substances Exposure to people of hazards associated with hazardous matenals is therefore less than significant Some hazardous matenals, such as asphalt and pannt, will be used dunng the residential construction process However, ordinary quantities of these matenals, stored in accordance with City Fnre Department requirements, wnll not pose a signnficant nsk to the public c Less Than S~gmficant Impact The nearest school is located on the northeast corner of Summit Avenue and East Avenue, appro~cunately half a Hole from the project site As explanned above, the project does not include uses which are likely to create any health hazards Therefore, impacts related to schools and hazardous matenals are less than signnficant d Less Than Significant Impact. Accordnng to the U S Environmental Protection Agency, there are no existing Supenfund sites within the Crty_ The proposed project is not located on a site that is included on a list of hazardous matenals sites pursuant to Govenunent Code Section 65962 5 and therefore would not create a hazard to the public or the environment e, f No Impact. The Rialto Munncipal Auport is located approxnmately 7 mnles to the east The . Ontano International Airport ns located approtunately 10 miles to the southwest of the project _ _ site There is a direct correlation bet<Leen potential hazard and distance to an anrport Given the large dnstance between the proposed project and the respective anrports, the airports do not represent a hazard for construction workers or people residing in the project area g No Impact. The City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan provides that "Pnmary and secondary routes should be designated for evacuation and access by emergency services Dnerent routes may need to be identified for different natural dnsasters" Through the envnronmental revnew process, consistency with the City's General Plan will be ensured h Less Than Signnficant Impact The proposed project is located at the interface of the City of Rancho Cucamonga's designation of Hazardous Areas and Non-hazardous Areas for wildland fires The General Plan provides that In areas designated as high fire hazard, the Crty and County should undertake or continue programs to minimize fuel buildup around residences and other occupied structures " The Plan further specifies programs to reduce hazards, mcludnng "Fire buffers along heavily traveled roads should be created by tlunnmg, dnscnng, or controlled burning subject to am quality restnctions " The project site does not contann a roadway designated as an emergency route Compliance • with emergency access requirements of the County and Crty Fire Departments and the Crty s H Client\00180027 3-9 Evaluation of Environmentallmpacts A 37 Cary of Rancho Cucamonga Ininal Study for Tentative Tract Number 16072 Police Department will ensure that emergency response to the site will not be affected Emergency fire response may also be served b~ the California Department of Forestry • Etiwanda Fue Station located approximately 1 ~ miles south of the project site Construction operations may temporanly impede traffic flow dunng construction activities of the project Detours and lane closures, if requued, will be provided to maintain adequate access dunng any construction activities, incluchng notification of lane restncttons and detours to adjacent users Given these factors, no significant impact is anticipated VIII. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY a, a Less than Sign~ficant with Mitigation The proposed project is located on the foothills of the San Gabnel Mountauis, on the Etiwanda allu~zal fan which is charactenzed by a fauly steep 6 percent grade Etiwanda Creek is less than 1/4 mile to east of the proposed project Day Creek Channel is over 1 mile to the west A prominent fault scarp trends northeast across the project site A blue line stream trends south, southeast across the project site The proposed project would result m the alteration of exiting drainage patterns and the amount and quality of surface runoff on the project site due to grading construction of impervious surfaces, imgatton of landscaped areas and the addition of residential and open space uses The project includes a proposed storm drain system that will connect to the existing channel • west of the project site to the Etiwanda Regional Spreading Grounds located east of the project site The storm dram system has been designed to accommodate storm flow requirements A serves of interim onsrte detention basins ~s also proposed in the fault zone open space area These temporary facilities are required until the San Bernardino County Flood Control Distnct completes planning and construction of the San Se~aine Regional Mainline Channel, regional flood control facilities for Etiwanda Creek outlined in the County Master Drainage Plan Proposed residential uses would have the potential to create contaminated runoff containing compounds such as landscape chemicals and automotive fluids Since the area of disturbance is greater than 5 acres, the project will require the preparation of a Storm Water Pollution Protection Plan (SWPPP) and the filing of a Nonce of Intent with the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) As part of standard construction practices, the Crty and RWQCB will require compliance with best management practces (BMPs) to ensure potentially harmful chemicals or pollutants are not discharged from the site Such measures may include sandbags, temporary drainage diversion and temporary containment areas • HCl~ent100180027 3-10 Evaluation ofEnvrronmentallmpacts A 38 City of Rancho Cucamonga Initial Study for 1 entattve Tract Number 16072 b Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed project does not include the infection into or • the extraction of groundwater Domestic water supply will be provided by the Cucamonga County Water District Project construction will not require substantial subsurface cuts which may impede groundwater movement The amount of impervious features included in the proposed project (e g , foundations, sidewalks, streets, etc) construction will not significantly affect groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level Open space areas will continue to allow for onsite recharge and storm flows collected within the storm drain system will be directed to the Etiwanda Spreading Grounds which will also allow for storm flow percolation to occur c-d Less Than Significant Impact. The project site contains two ephemeral drainages The largest drainage begins at the confluence of the concrete flood control channel (located at the northern end of the property, adjacent to the residential development west of the project site), and a natural channel that flows from the northwest The natural portion of the drainage flows to the southeast and merges with a defined flood control channel that parallels the southern boundary of the project site The second drainage is located on the east side of the project site It flows from the northwest to southeast and offsite, eventually merging with the flood control channel on the southern boundary The proposed project would result in the alteration of the existing drainage patterns and the amount and rate of surface runoff due to grading construction of impervious surfaces, imgation of landscaped areas, and the addition of residential and open space uses To compensate for the additional runoff from the development area, drainage facilities would be provided as part of the proposed project to direct runoff to storm drainage facilities The proposed storm water drainage/detention basin system would replace the existing drainages on the project site These engineered control systems are designed as to reduce any potential of substantial erosion, siltation, or flooding on- or offsite f Less than Significant with Mitigation Implementation of the proposed project would result iii grading of up to approximately 150 8 acres T'he proposed project has the potential to cause changes in the quality of surface water Construction of the proposed development would require grading and excavation activities that may allow eroded soils and other pollutants to enter the stone dram system Stone water nznoff from road~t ay surfaces may be contaminated by sediment, petroleum products, and commonly utilized construction materials The mass grading of 1~0 8 acres could have a significant impact on water quality and result in substantial erosion Grading activities associated with the implementation of the proposed • project could result iri sediment being released into area storm drains Therefore, the protect H Client\00180027 3-11 Evaluation of Environmentallmpacts A 39 City of Rancho Cucamonga Initial Study for 1 entative Tract Number 16072 will require the preparation of a Storm Water Pollution Protection Plan (SWPPP) and the filing of a Notice of Intent with the Regional Water Quality Control Board As part of • standard construction practices, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will require compliance with best management practices (BMPs) to ensure potentially harmful cheiicals or pollutants are not discharged from the site Such measures include sandbags, temporary drainage diversion and temporary containment areas The project proponent will also have to apply for grading permits and supply an erosion control plan A construction permit must be obtained from the Califonua Regional Water Quality Control Board, Santa Ana Region, for grading activities Once construction is completed, residential uses could have the potential to create contaminated runoff containing constituents such as landscape chemicals and petroleum products The EIR will provide further analysrs of the effects to hydrology and water quality that could potentially occur with project implementation A hydrological study for the proposed project is currently being prepared The findings will be included in the project EIR g No Impact The proposed project site lies on an alluvial £an The upstream watershed of the property is currently undeveloped and supports a senes of drainages, several of which continue across the alluvial fan onto the project site The project site lies within Zone "D" of the Flood Insurance Rate Map, indicating that the flood hazards are currently undetermined Episodic flooding has occurred as a result of generalized flows from direct rainfall to the area • General flood protection would be provided by the construction of the 25`h Street Diversion Channel, when completed Intenm flood control would be provided through on site detention basins until flood control improvements are complete adjacent to the Interstate 210 freeway A Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) study would be required, along with a letter of map revision through FEMA The study would identify any necessary mitigation measure, if any portion of the project area is determined to be within Zone "A," which would indicate a senous potential nsk from flooding h, i No Impact According to the City General Plan, the project site is not located within the 100-year floodplain Therefore, implementation of the proposed project would not place housing in a 100-~ ear hazard area or place structures within a 100-year hazard area which would impede or redirect flood flows ~ Less Than Significant Impact. The geographic location and elevation of the project srte precludes effects from tsunarrus The proposed project does not include the construction of reservoirs or other large water storage facilities that could cause a seiche The project srte lies at the base of the San Gabnel Mountairi foothills Although the site could be impacted by mudflows or landslides caused by extreme environmental conditions and downslope grading activities, the nsk of loss due to mudflows will be reduced with the addition of the proposed • H Client\00180027 3-12 Evaluation of EYNironmental Impacts A-40 City of Rancho Cucamonga Irahal Sr>~dy for ~ entahve Tract Number 16072 storm drainage system and the incorporation of Best Management Practice into the design of • the project The potential of mudflow or landslide impacts will be further addressed in the EIR Development standards will be imposed on the applicant and other special requirements including a detailed slope analysis, grading plan, geologic report, and a soils erosion control plan All reports/studies/plans will be reviewed and addressed in the EIR IX L.~rm UsE AND PLANNIlVG a No Impact The project site is located in an unincorporated area of the County and within the City's Sphere of Influence There is currently no established community that will be affected by this project Land uses in close proximity to the project site include an SCE powerlirie and vacant land to the north, vacant land and the County flood control channel to the east, a residential development to the west and the Cucamonga County Water Distnct treatment plant to the immediate south The project site is currently vacant Implementation of the proposed project will, therefore, not physically divide an established community This project is consistent with newly constructed and proposed housing projects within the immediate area b Potentially Significant Impact The proposed project is a residential development of up to 3~9 detached single-family homes with a density of approximately 2 4 dwelling units per acre • The land is currently in the unincorporated area of San Bernardino County but lies within the City of Rancho Cucamonga Sphere of Influence Annexation into the Crty is being proposed as part of the project The City's General Plan currently designates the southern portion of the project site as Low Medium density residential housing (4 to 8 dwelling units per acre) and the northern portion of the site as Low Density (2 to 4 dwelling units per acre) The proposed development will require annexation into the Crty, but is consistent with the City's current General Plan The project is also part of the City's Etiwanda North Specific Plan (Specific Plan) Under the Specific Plan, the current land use designations are Low Density Residential (2 to 4 dwelling units per acre) for the southern portion of the project site and Very Low Density Residential (less than two dwelling units per acre) for the northern portion of the site Though the southern portion of the project site is consistent with the Specific Plan, an amendment of the Cit<~ s Specific Plan may be required for the northern portion of the project site c Less than Significant Impact The North Etiwanda azea is recognized as a vital resource for the preservation of native plant and anunal species through the guiding principles stated in the County of San Bernardino's North Etiwanda Open Space Habitat Preservation Program (NEOSHPP) The NEOSHPP's main focus is on the preservation of rare and endangered • species However, the NEOSHPP is a voluntary program that has never been fully HClient100180027 3-13 EvaluatronofEnvironmentallmpacts A41 Cary of Rancho Cucamonga Inlttal Study for,. entahve Tract Number 16072 implemented Therefore, the proposed project will not conflict with an adopted conservation plan • X. MINERAL RESOURCES a, b Less Than Sigmficant Impact Based on a review of the County of San Bernardino General Plan Mineral Resources Overlay map, the project site is classified MRZ-2 This category descnbes areas where adequate information indicates that sigmficant mineral deposits are present, or where rt is fudged that a high likelihood for this presence exists Mining activres do not presently occur on the site, but active aggregate musing operations presently occur throughout the area The City General Plan also notes that the extraction of aggregate impacts the surrounding environment and can adversely impact adjacent planned land uses Consequently certain land use patterns m proximity to resource extraction areas are generally incompatible Because the site may contain some mineral resources, a soil study will be conducted to evaluate soil test results to confirm that the potential of incremental loss of any aggregate resources present on the project site will be considered less than significant The findings of the study will be included m the project EIR XI NOISE a, d Potentially Significant Impact. The nearest noise sensitive receptors in pro~.imrty to the • project site include single-family residences located directly to dlc west and southwest, and Etiwanda Creek Park a community park located approximately one-third of a mile southeast of the project srte An analysis of the potential noise impacts of the proposed project will be documented m a technical report and included in the project EIR The noise assessment will analyze construction-related noise levels and future noise levels form vehicle-generated noise both with and «ithout the proposed project The County and City Noise Ordinance standards will be used in the analysis of construction- and traffic-related noise levels b No Impact The proposed project consists of a residential development that would not require the use of pile dnvers or other high vibration generation equipment Therefore, construction activities are not anticipated to cause excessive groundbome vibration or groundborne noise levels c Potentially Significant Impact The development of new housing and subsequent increases in traffic would increase ambient noise levels above existing levels The City of Rancho Cucamonga has specified Land Use Noise Standards for residential, commercial/office and industnal land uses Noise impacts related to this project and their consistency with the City's • H C1~ent100180027 3-14 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts A -42 City of Rancho Cucamonga Initial Study for < ~ntatrve Tract Number 16072 Land Use Noise Standards will be assessed m the noise study conducted for the project The • findings of the study and the technical report will be included In the EIR e, f No Impact The project site Is not located within an airport land use plan, nor Is It located within two miles of a public airport, public use airport or in the vicinity of a private airstrip The closest airport to the project site is the Rialto Municipal Airport located approxunately six mules to the east No Impact associated with airport-related noise would, therefore, occur XII POPULATION AND HOUSING a Potentially Significant Impact. The proposed project Is Included In the planning area of the City s General Plan Future development under the General Plan is expected to result in a population of 156,778 people within the General Plan, planning area This future population represents an Increase of 31,178 people, or a 25% increase from the current population under General Plan estimated baseline conditions in 2000 Future development Is expected to result In ~~,612 housing units throughout the planning area This future housing represents an increase of 13,500 new housing units, or a 32% increase from the current population under General Plan estimated baseline conditions in 2000 • According to SCAG, future growth is expected to continue to be concentrated m the southwestern portion of the County, particularly with the stimulation of employment growth resulting from the Ontario Airport expansion and other rapidly developing Industry In the area The project proposes development of 359 dwelling units, which would provide residence for approximately 1,238 people, based on the average household size of 3 48 people per household Thus, the proposed project will provide 2 7% of the City's future housing needs, for 4% of the City's future population The Installation of new roadways and utility Imes serving the new residential development could potentially Induce the continuation of an urban development trend occumng within the area The EIR will provide a detailed analysis of projected growth and indirect Impacts b, c No Impact The proposed project is located on undeveloped property and would not result in displacement of substantial numbers of existing housing or people XIII. PUBLIC SERVICES a The Clty proposes annexation of the site as part of the proposed protect Providing services to • anew residential community of approximately 359 single-family homes will result in an H Client~00180027 3-15 Evaluation of Environmentallmpacts A 43 Crty of Rancho Cucamonga Inrtial Study for l .,ntative Tract Number 16072 Increased demand for vanous public services, including police, fire, schools, parks, etc Funding for expanded public services may be fully or partially offset through development • fees, however the unpacts to existing public services will be assessed in the EIR Frre protection Potentially Significant Impact. Fire protection services would be provided the by the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Distnct Fire Station 173 would be the first due, with a response time of approY.iinately five minutes Stations 175 and 174 would provide additional fire protection support Anew Fire Station, 176, will open in late 2003 at East Avenue and 23rd Street The Rancho Cucamonga Fire Distnct has an automatic aid agreement with all surrounding fire agencies The California Department of Forestry Etiwanda Fire Station, located approxunately 1 ~ miles south of the project site, would provide added service for those emergencies involving wildland fires Fire protection services may be particularly significant given the protect site's location within a high probability, high consequence fire hazard area Upon development the project would become part of the Very High Fire Severity Zone subject to specific Health and Safety Code requirements The project would also be subject to the requirements of the San Bernardino County Fire Safety Overlay Distnct The project would also be located within Community Facilities Distnct 88-1 The revenue from the CFD is intended to mitigate the impact of development on Fire Distnct services Police protection Potentially Significant Impact. The City of Rancho Cucamonga currently • contracts with the San Bernardino County Shenff's Department far police protection services The City's General Plan identifies the potential for locating a Shenffs Substation in the North Etiwanda area to provide effective service to the developing community The impacts for providing police protection services to the proposed project will be analyzed and addressed in the EIR Schools Potentially Significant Impact The Citv's General Plan identifies a potential shortage of schools within the community due to anticipated growth The proposed project is located within the Etiwanda School Distnct Extension Area According to the General Plan, as of early 2001 three of the five school distncts serving the City have no additional student capacity Of the four elementary school distncts, only the Etiwanda School Distnct reports being below capacity, but only as a result of new school construction In the nelrt five-years, the Etiwanda School Distnct anticipates a sigmficant increase in enrollment and has been building new schools to accommodate that growth As most of the vacant land available for residential development is located within the Etiwanda area, the Etiwanda School Distnct will be most impacted by future development • H Client\00180027 3-16 Evaluation ofErrvironmentallmpacts A 44 City of Rancho Cucamonga Inrtial Study for . entatrve Tract Number 16072 The Chaffey Joint Union High School District extends throughout the city Anew high school • was constructed in 1993 to provide for addrtiona.l capacity during the 1994-95 school year An additional high school may also be necessary to provide adequate resources for projected growth Development fees to support expanded school services are authorized under the California Educational Code Currently, new development is assessed a fee of $1 93 per square foot for residential development and $0 31 per square foot of commerc~aUindustnal development The impacts for provtdmg additional classroom capacity will be evaluated in the EIR Parks Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed project will increase demand on public parks The Crty maintains a park standard of five acres of parkland for every 1,000 residents The project will provide approximately 13 acres of new recreational land as part of the project This recreattonal space will provide the community vv~th hiking and bilang opportunities along a multi-purpose trail and open-space paseos which will ultimately connect to the regional trail network along East Avenue Other public facrl~lies Potentially Significant Impact. The increased population caused by the addition of 3~9 new single-family homes will place additional demands on a variety of • public services including hospitals, medical offices, public transportation, libraries, etc the significance of these impacts will be evaluated and discussed to the EIR XIV RECREATION a, b Less Than Significant Impact. The addition of 359 new single-farruly residences will likely require additional maintenance of existing recreational facilities and/or the construction of additional facilities due to increased demand This demand will be offset by the construction of the multi-purpose recreational trail and open-space paseos that will provide an additional source of recreation to the local community No additional sources of revenue will be necessary to maintain existing facilities other than local assessments and taxes currently m place XV TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC a, b Potentially Significant Impact. The site is currently accessed along unimproved dirt roads The addition of 359 new single-farruly homes will require improvements to these e~istmg access roads including the construction of new paved roadways at Etiwanda and East Avenues north of Wilson Avenue, as well as construction of a paved roadway at Wilson • Avenue H C1~ent~00180027 3-17 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts A-45 Cary of Rancho Cucamonga Inrnal Study for 1 entatrve Tract Number 16072 The Congestion Management Plan (CMP) (Government Code §6088 and §65089) and the • San Bernardmo County Congestion Management Program, 1999 Update require the preparation of a CMP traffic impact analysis report for all projects that meet the local criteria for preparing a traffic Impact study m the Cary of Rancho Cucamonga A traffic study conducted for the proposed project will be reviewed by an independent traffic consultant to ensure that CMP guidelines have been met The results of the traffic study results will be incorporated into the EIR along with any mitigation measures required to reduce impacts to less than significant levels c No Impact The closest airport to the project site is the Rialto Municipal Airport located approximately six miles to the east No change associated with air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety asks would occur d Less Than Significant Impact. Project roadways will need to reflect the designs and standards m full compliance with applicable City of Rancho Cucamonga requirements No sharp turns or dangerous corners will be allowed Incompatible uses, such as with farm equipment, «ill also be prohibited A complete analysis of roadway improvements will be evaluated in the EIR to determine whether any potential hazards are included in the current project design • e Less Than Significant Impact. The County General Plan indicates that the Interstate h~ freeway is designated as an emergency evacuation route m the County The onsrte circulation system and the access roads to the project site would be constructed consistent with the City's Development Code and applicable City Fire Department requirements related to emergency access The proposed project includes the construction of East Avenue south of Wilson Avenue, providing additional emergency access to the area Proposed streets and improvements will be evaluated in the EIR in terms of their impacts on emergency access and consistency ~~ rth City regulations f Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed project will provide for adequate parking capacity as part of its design Single-farruly homes will include garages, driveway and street parking as pan of its design features Consistency with the Cit_v's Development Code standards will be evaluated in the EIR • H CLent100180027 3-18 Evaluation of Environmentallmpacts A -46 Cary of Rancho Cucamonga Initial Study for _ „ntative Tract Number 16072 g Less Than Significant Impact. The consistency of the project with the area's adopted • polices, plans or programs supporting alternative transportation will be evaluated m the project EIR Implementation of the proposed project would provide multi-purpose trails within and adjacent to the development designed consistent with the Crty's Development Code XVI UTII,TTIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS Natural gas would be provided by Sempra Energy, which has asix-inch gas main in Wilson Avenue, along the southern project boundary According to Sempra Energy connection of the proposed project to this gas main would not adversely effect the operation of the gas main Each household is expected to use approximately 2,400 cubic feet per day of natural gas Total daily consumption of natural gas is expected to be 861,600 cubic feet a, b Less Than Significant Impact The proposed project ties within two sewer drainage areas the eaistmg Etiwanda Avenue Trunk Sewer and the proposed East Avenue Trunk Sewer The ttvo Trunk Sewers connect to the Inland Empire Utilities Agency (IEUA) wastewater treatment facilities • Wastewater from the proposed project would not be anticipated to exceed current and planned treatment capacity Construction of new wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of the existing facilities above those already planned would not be anticipated It is not anticipated that the proposed project would exceed the wastewater treatment requirements of the RWQCB c Potentially Significant Impact Intenm storm water retention basins will be installed onsite as part of the project until improvements to the existing storm water drainage system can be completed New storm drainage facilities for the proposed project would be constructed as an integral part of the proposed project Intenm basins are not consistent with the Etiwanda/San Sevaine Area Drainage policy A preliminary drainage study would be required to determine the appropnate size of flood protection and identification of appropnate mitigation measures The project s inconsistency with local drainage policies_ and other impacts related to drainage facilities will be further assessed m the EIR d Potentially Significant Impact Domestic water will be supplied by the Cucamonga County Water Distnct Existing entitlements and resources will be reviewed to determine whether the existing project will impact current resources Both short-term (construction) and long-term impacts of increased water demand will be assessed in the EIR • H CIlent~00180027 3-19 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts A 47 City ofRancho CucarnongG Initial Study for _ entatrve Tract Number 16072 e Potentially Significant Impact Wastewater treatment services are provided by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency The agency currently owns and operates four wastewater treatment • facilities with a fifth facility under construction Existing capacity and the ability to meet projected demands will be evaluated in the EIR to deterrune whether this project may have a significant impact on wastewater treatment capacity f, g Less Than Significant Impact. Solid waste disposal is provided by Burrtec Waste Industnces, Inc (Burrtec) through a contract with the City Refuse from the proposed project would be taken to the West Valley Materal Recovery Facility (MRF), a fully permitted transfer station and matenal recovery facility The West Valley MRF is permitted to accept 5,000 tons per day of municipal solid waste and mixed recyclables Non-recyclable solid waste would be transferred to a County landfill served by the County of San Bernardino Solid Waste Management Division The closest landfill to the project area is the Mid-Valley landfill located in the City of Rialto The facility currently receives approximately 1,000 tons per day and is permitted for up to 7,00 tons per day The site has sufficient remaining capacity for the region through 2033 Burrtec has indicated that they do not expect any long-term impacts associated with solid waste disposal at the MRF or in the County The project will comply with federal, state and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste XVII MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE • a Potentially Significant Impact. Based on possible habitat on the project site, the project could have the potential to affect sensitive wildlife species Junsdictional drainages also occur on the site The EIIZ will provide a comprehensive analysis of the potential effects to biological resources as well as, mitigation measures necessary to reduce impacts to below the threshold of significance Histoncal resources could also potentially e~:ist onsite, however, no known prehistonc resources have been recorded Subsurface cultural and paleontologic resources could exist therefore, mitigation measures will be recommended in the EIR to reduce potential impacts to subsurface cultural and paleontologic resources to less than significant b,c Potentially Significant Several of the potential impacts identified ui this Initial Study could degrade the quality of the environment if they were not avoided or sufficiently mitigated The proposed Tentative Tract Map Number 16072 and annexation project could affect aesthetics, air quality, biological resources, cultural resources, geology and soils, hydrology and water quality, land use and planning, noise, population and housing, public services, transportation traffic, and utilities and service systems At this point, a final determination cannot be made Additional studies or information is required for the above listed resource areas The cumulative effects of these changes may be significant if not mitigated Several of • H Client\00180027 3-20 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts A-48 Cary of Rancho Cucamonga Initial Study for ~ entattve Tract Number 16072 the potential lmpacts identified to this Initial Study could have substantial adverse effects on • humans tf not mitigated An EIR will, therefore, be prepared for the proposed protect The EIR will provide analysts of potentlal lmpacts and consider direct and indirect effects, and short- term and long-term effects and cumulative effects • H Client~00180027 3-21 Evaluation of Environmental lmpacts A 49 City of Rancho Cucamongc. Initial Study for r entahve Tract Number 16072 4.0 REFERENCES California Departrnent of Conservation • San Bernardino County Important Farmland 1996, Western Sheet City of Rancho Cucamonga Ettwanda North Specific Plan, adopted Apnl 1, 1992 General Plan adopted October 17, 2001 City of Rancho Cucamonga Web Site, www ci rancho-cucamon>Za ca us Federal Emergency Management Agency Flood Rate Insurance Map, Map Number 0607107895 F, effective March 18, 1996 GeoSoils, Inc Addendum to Preliminary Geotechnrcal Investigation, Tentative Tract No 16072, Rancho Cucamonga San Bernardino County, California July 26, 2002 Prepared for Hill Country Preliminary Geotechnrcal Investigation 132+ Acre Parcel Northeast Corner of Wilson and Etiwanda Avenues, Rancho Cucamonga San Bernardino County, California November 11, 1998 Prepared for Richland Ventures Supplemental Geologic/Fault Investigation Tentative Tract Map No 16072 Rancho Cucamonga San Bernardino County, California November 30, 2000 Prepared for Richland Ventures • PCR Services Corporation Focused Coastal Calrfornra Gnatcatcher Survey Report for the Etiwanda Protect Srte, San Bernardino County, Calrfornra, August 9, 2001 Focused Coastal Calrfornra Gnatcatcher Survey Report for the Etiwanda Protect Srte, San Bernardino County, Calrfornra, July 15, 2002 Focused Sensitive Plant Survey Report for the Ettwanda Protect Stte, San Bernardino County California September 20, 2001 Initial Study Etiwanda Subdivison, March 2001 Prepazed for Hill Country, S A ,Ltd RK Engmeenng Group Inc Etiwanda Properties (Revised) Traffic Impact Analysts, San Bernardino County, Calrfornra January 10, 2002 Prepared for Richland Communities San Bemarduio County General Plan Revised August 1991 Flood Control Distnct General Information N d Flood Plain Safety (FP) Overlay Distnct, San Bernardino County Development Code • H Client\00180027 4-1 References A 50 City of Rancho Cucamongc, Inittal Study for . entative Tract Number 16072 Floodway (FV~ Distnct Land Use, San Bernardino Development Code • South Coast Air Quality Management Distnct SCAOMD CEOA Air Quality Handbook 1993 The Keith Companies Tracey Development North Ehwanda Environmental Impact Report, September Area Tentative Tract Map 14749 Protect 10, 2001 Prepared for County of San Bernardino US Geological Survey Cucamonga Peak, California quadrangle map, revised 1996 • • H Client~00180027 4-2 References A51 • City of Rancho Cucamonga ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM INITIAL STUDY PART II BACKGROUND 1. Project Files SUBTT16072 2 Related Files• Development Agreement DRC2002-00156, Annexation DRC2002-00865, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2003-00461 3 Description of Project TIME EXTENSION FOR ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16072 - RICHLAND PINEHURST INC - A request for a time extension for a previously approved tentative tract map to subdivide 150 79 acres into 359 lots in the Low (2-4 dwelling units per acre) and Very Low (0 1 to 2 dwelling units per acre) Residential Districts, with an average density of 2 3 dwelling units per acre for the entire project, in the Upper Etiwanda Neighborhood of the Etiwanda North Specific Plan, located at northwest corner of Wilson Avenue and East Avenue APN 0225-083-01, 12, 13, 15, 16, and 20 Staff found the protect to be within the scope of the project covered by a prior Environmental Impact Report certified by City • Council in June 16, 2004, by Resolution 04-204 and does not raise or create new environmental impacts not already considered in the Environmental Impact Report 4. Project Sponsor's Name and Address Richland Communities, Inc John Schafer Senior Vice President 4100 Newport Place, Suite 800 Newport Beach, CA 92660 5 General Plan Designation Very Low Density Residential (<2 dwelling units per acre) Low Density Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) Red Hill Fault Zone 6 Zoning Very Low (0 1-2 dwelling units per acre) Low (2-4 dwelling units per acre) Red Hill Fault Zone 7 Surrounding Land Uses and Setting The protect is located on approximately 150 8 acres north of Wilson Avenue and east of Etiwanda Avenue within the Etiwanda North Specific Plan The project site slopes from northwest to southeast at an approximate six (6) percent grade and is bisected by the • Red Hill Fault, which is proposed as a landscaped open space trail Vehicular access to the site will be provided via Etiwanda Avenue, East Avenue, and Wilson Avenue The existing surrounding land uses include the Tracy Residential Development (Very Low A 52 initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga S U BTT16072 Page 2 Residential Zone -less than 2 dwelling units per acre) and the Southern California • Edison (SCE) power line corridor to the north, residential uses (Very Low Residential Zone) and the Cucamonga County Water District (CCWD) treatment facility to the south, vacant land (Very Low Residential Zone) and the East Etiwanda Creek to the east, and residential uses (Low Residential Zone - 2 to 4 dwelling unfits per acre) to the west 8 Lead Agency Name and Address. City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 9 Contact Person and Phone Number. Pei-Ming Chou, Associate Planner (909) 477-2750 10 Other agencies whose approval is required: None ANALYSIS: The impacts of this project were evaluated m Environmental Impact Report certified by the City of Rancho Cucamonga on June 16, 2004, and no change is proposed The project will be required to implement all pertinent mitigation measures adopted in the EIR The project was developed with a development agreement for the 359 lot subdivision The Site Pian, building elevations, and development conditions for the • proposed project are included in the Development Agreement and are generally consistent with the Development Code and the Etiwanda North Specific Plan DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation (~) I find that, although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there WILL NOT be a significant effect in this case because all potentially significant effects 1) have been analyzed adequately m an earlier EIR pursuant to applicable standards, and 2) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed p rod ect EARLIER ANALYSES Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or Negative Declaration per Section 15063(c)(3)(D) The effects identified above for this project were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in the following earlier document(s) pursuant to applicable legal standards, and such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier ana-lysis The following earlier analyses were utilized in completing this Initial Study and are available~or review in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Department offices, 10500 Civic C rive Signed Date ~ ~t1~01 ei-Ming Chou, s is a tanner • A 53 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga SUBTT16072 Page 3 X Environmental Im act Re ort for Ri ( ) p p chland Pinehurst Tentative Tract Map Number 16072 (State Clearinghouse No 2002091053) (Certified June 16, 2004) (X) initial Study for Tentative Tract Map No 16072 (September 2002) APPLICANT CERTIFICATION I certify that I am the applicant for the project described in this Initial Study I acknowledge that I have read this Initial Study and the proposed mitigation measures Further, I have revised the project plans or proposals and/or hereby agree to the proposed mitigation measures to avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant environmental effects would occur Signature l~~~~~~~ ~ Date ~ ~7 D? Print Name and Title 1U1'i~ ~~7 , ~?ltJ ~~~~~ c: A 54 • RESOLUTION NO 07-26 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A REQUEST FOR THE EXTENSION OF PREVIOUSLYAPPROVED TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16072, A SUBDIVISION OF 150 79 ACRES INTO 359 LOTS IN THE LOW (2-4 UNITS DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) AND VERY LOW (0 1-2 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS, WITH AN AVERAGE DENSITY OF 2 3 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE FOR THE ENTIRE PROJECT, IN THE UPPER ETIWANDA NEIGHBORHOOD OF THE ETIWANDA NORTH SPECIFIC PLAN, LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF WILSON AVENUE AND EAST AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF-APN 0225-083-01, 12, 13, 15, 16, AND 20 A Recitals 1 Richland Communities, Inc filed an application for the extension of the approval of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16072, as described m the title of this Resolution Hereinafter m this Resolution, the subject Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16072 Time Extension request is referred to as "the application " 2 On June 16, 2004, the City Council adopted its Resolution No 04-204, thereby, approving Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16072 subject to specific conditions and time limits • 3 On May 23, 2007, and continued to June 13, 2007, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date 4 All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred B Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows 1 This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on May 23, 2007, and continued to June 13, 2007, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows a The previously approved Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16072 is in substantial compliance with the City's current General Plan, specific plans, ordinances, plans, codes, and policies, and b The extension of the Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16072 approval will not cause significant inconsistencies with the current General Plan, specific plans, ordinances, plans, codes, • and policies, and A 55 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 07-26 SUBTT16072 - RICHLAND COMMUNITIES, INC June 13, 2007 Page 2 c The extension of the Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16072 approval is not likely to cause public health and safety problems, and d The extension is within the time limits established by State law and local ordinance 3 Based upon the facts and information contained in the application, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that no subsequent or supplemental environmental document is required pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in connection with the review and approval of this application based upon the following findings and determinations a Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA")and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City certified an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) on June 16, 2004 in connection with the City's approval of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16072 Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, no subsequent or supplemental EIR or Negative Declaration is required in connection with subsequent discretionary approvals of the same project unless (i) substantial changes are proposed to the protect that indicate new or more severe impacts on the environment, (ii) substantial changes have occurred in the circumstances underwhich the project was previously reviewed that indicates new or more severe environmental impacts, or (ni) new important information shows the project will have new or more severe impacts than previously considered, or (iv) additional mitigation measures are now feasible to reduce impacts or different mitigation measures can be imposed to substantially reduce impacts b The Planning Commission finds, in connection with the time extension request, that substantial changes to the project or the circumstances surrounding the project have not occurred which would create new or more severe impacts than those evaluated in the previously certified EIR The proposed time extension request does not raise or create new environmental impacts not already considered in the Environmental Impact Report for the tract map Staff furtherfinds that the project will not have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previously certified EIR, not have more severe effects than previously analyzed, and that additional or different mitigation measures are not required to reduce the impacts of the project to a level of less than significant The proposed time extension request does not raise or create new environmental impacts not already considered in the Environmental Impact Report for the tract map c Based on these findings and all evidence in the record, the Planning Commission concurs with the staff determination that no additional environmental review is required pursuant to CEQA in connection with the City's consideration of the time extension 4 Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, and 3 above, this Commission hereby grants a time extension for Tentative Map SUBTT16072 Applicant Richland Communities, Inc Expiration June 16, 2008 • • • A 56 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 07-26 SUBTT16072 - RICHLAND COMMUNITIES, INC June 13, 2007 • Page 3 5 The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 13TH DAY OF JUNE 2007 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY Pam Stewart, Chairman ATTEST James R Troyer, AICP, Secretary I, James R Troyer, AICP, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 13th day of June 2007, by the following vote-to-wit • AYES COMMISSIONERS NOES COMMISSIONERS ABSENT COMMISSIONERS • A 57 ~~ /`^ `. ~~~~ ~~~~- ~~~- T H E C I T Y O F RANCHO C U C A M O N G A Stiff Report DATE June 13, 2007 TO Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM James R Troyer, AICP, Planning Director BY Donald Granger, Associate Planner SUBJECT CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2006-00510 -CASH AND ASSOCIATES ENGINEERS - A request for a land use entitlement for an existing legal, non-conforming processing facility operated by Pacific Coast Recycling and to replace existing outdated automobile shredding and ferrous metal recycling plant • facilities with modernized equipment on approximately 5 00 acres of land in the Heavy Industrial District (Subarea 15), located at 8822 Etiwanda Avenue - APN 0229-131-15 This protect is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15301 (Class 1 Exemption -Existing Facilities) The scope of the protect consists of minor alterations to the existing facilities, consisting of the changing out of existing industrial and mechanical equipment with modern industrial and mechanical equipment PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION A Surrounding Land Use and Zoning North - Ameron Pipe Inc -Heavy Industrial (Subarea 15) South - Reliant Energy -Heavy Industrial (Subarea 15) East - Bernell Hydraulics -Heavy Industrial (Subarea 15) West - Tomra Steel -Heavy Industrial (Subarea 15) B General Plan Designations Protect Site -Heavy Industrial North -Heavy Industrial South -Heavy Industrial East -Heavy Industrial West -Heavy Industrial • C Site Characteristics The protect site is located approximately 650 feet west of Etiwanda Avenue, lust north of the Metrolink railroad line The entrance to the site is via an access license agreement from Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad off Etiwanda ITEM B PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2006-00510 -CASH AND ASSOCIATES ENGINEERS June 13, 2006 Page 2 Avenue To the north is Ameron, a manufacturer of large diameter pipes hydrological purposes, and to the south is an electrical generating facility To the west is Tamco Steel and to the east is Bernell Hyraulics Across Etiwanda Avenue are a variety of industrial uses and one legal, non-conforming restaurant The project site is generally surrounded by large-scale, heavy-impact industrial uses The proposed change out of the existing equipment with modernized equipment should not create any conflicts with the existing land uses in the area and is consisten# with the land use designation of the General Plan D Parking Calculations Number of Number of - ' " ~kSq~uare~~~ x ,~ Parking ' ~~paces ~ Spaces T eaof Use ~ t a~o~ta e' - Ratio Re aired Provided Heavy N/A 1 /500 Manufacturin Office 1,200 1 /250 5 Totals 5 20 "`See parking analysis below E Parking Analysis Since the Development Code bases parking calculations on square footage and the project involves an existing, legal, non-conforming outdoor shredding use involving ferrous materials with conveyor systems, traditional parking calculations based upon the square footages of a building are not the best methodology of calculating the required parking As part of the discretionary review process, the applicant is providing 20 parking stalls Staff supports the applicant's proposal of 20 stalls since the operation has a total of 48 employees spread over two shifts, and the parking improvements will lessen the degree of non-conformity ANALYSIS • • A General There are several single-story support structures on the site, such as a maintenance building, administration building, and rejects bay The recycling facility has been in operation as a legal, non-conforming use under different entities under the County of San Bernardino's jurisdiction prior to the City's incorporation in 1977 Based upon a review of business licenses and information provided from the applicant, research indicates that the operation began in the early 1970's, most probably in 1973 The operation is engaged in the shredding of automobiles and the recycling of ferrous materials The applicant is proposing to replace aging shredding and ferrous recycling equipment with newer, more efficient equipment Processing facilities require the review and approval of a Conditional Use Permit Since the facility predates the City's incorporation, the applicant is requesting the Planning Commission's review of the • necessary entitlement (CUP), along with the equipment exchange in order to lessen the B-2 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2006-00510 -CASH AND ASSOCIATES ENGINEERS June 13, 2006 Page 3 degree of non-conformity by obtaining the required land use permit under Section 17 30 030 of the Development Code B Use Description and Hours of Operation Pacific Coast Recycling operates an industrial metal shredding facility, primarily engaged m the shredding of automobiles and tin products The metals are recycled, thereby reducing the amount of waste that would otherwise be sent to landfills Scrap metal is purchased from auto dismantlers and scrap metal recyclers in the San Bernardino and Riverside areas After the metal is shredded, it is sold as metal feedstock to steel mills, including the adjacent Tamco Steel facility, which manufactures construction reinforcing bars The facility has 48 full-time employees operating on two shifts Normal work hours are Monday through Friday If necessary, because of large inventory of unprocessed scrap metal, they can operate 24 hours a day, 7 days per week C Site improvements As discussed above, the applicant is proposing to replace aging equipment with modernized equipment The replacement of the equipment will most likely result in lowering the sound levels generated by the machinery The applicant is proposing to provide screening from the Metrolink railroad by planting a row of Fraxinus Velutina, and the existing 60-foot light poles will be replaced with 25-foot light poles that meet the Development Code height requirements Other site enhancements include the installation of parking stalls, improvements to the employee outdoor eating area, removing non-conforming signage, adding landscaping for screening purposes along the east property line and making public improvements to Etiwanda Avenue The proposed improvements will decrease the existing level of non-conformity D Compatibility with surroundings The premise of all Conditional Use Permits is to ensure the compatibility of adjacent uses and separation of potential nuisance activities Land uses surrounding the existing facility are of a similar nature, all involving heavy manufacturing To the north is Ameron Pipe, to west is Tamco Steel, and to the south is an energy plant To the east is Bernell Hydraulics Since all land uses surrounding the metal shredding and recycling facility are similar in land use and involve heavy manufacturing, the Conditional Use Permit for the existing facility should not have any negative or nuisance impacts on the nearby land uses Staff reviewed Code Enforcement records for the property and found no violations on file E Noise, Odor, and Vibration Since the facility involves the shredding and recycling of scrap metal, there is considerable noise generated The applicant ordered an acoustic reading of the existing sound levels, and the readings indicate that acoustic levels at the property line are 80Ldn, under the permitted limit of 85Ldn for uses within Heavy Industrial Districts (Exhibit I) Odors from the use should not be perceptible beyond the parcel lines, and vibration should not be discernible beyond 600 feet from the source without the use of instruments, thereby meeting the Industrial Performance Standards listed in Table 17 30 050 The Draft Resolution of Approval includes a condition of approval requiring • that upon installation of the new equipment, a sound study be prepared by an acoustical engineer and shall be submitted to the Planning Director demonstrating compliance with B-3 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2006-00510 -CASH AND ASSOCIATES ENGINEERS June 13, 2006 Page 4 the performance standards for the Heavy Industrial District Should the sound levels exceed the allowable maximum noise levels, the acoustic engineer shall recommend mitigation measures to bring the Horse levels into compliance F Design Review Committee The project was reviewed on May 1, 2007, by the Design Review Committee (Munoz, Stewart and Draz) At the meeting, the Committee reviewed the project and recommended approval, subject to the site enhancements discussed above that are included as conditions in the attached Resolution of Approval G Gradrng Committee The project was reviewed by the Grading Committee on April 17, 2007 The Committee recommended approval H Technical Review Committee The Technical Review Committee reviewed the project on April 17, 2007, and recommended approval subject to the Standard Conditions outlined in the attached Resolution of Approval Environmental Assessment The Planning Department Staff has determined that the project rs categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines The project qualifies under as a Class 1 Exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15301 (Existing Facilities) The scope of the project consists of minor alteration to existing facilities, consisting of the changing out of existing industrial and mechanical equipment with modern industrial and mechanical equipment, therefore, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment Additionally, the modern equipment will be more energy efficient per recycled ton and Horse generation levels will likely be reduced Staff evaluated the proposed Conditional Use Permit DRC2006-00510 and concludes that the proposed changing out of the existing equipment with modern equipment will not have a significant impact on the environment CORRESPONDENCE This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to ail property owners within a 660-foot radius of the project site RECOMMENDATION With the improvements proposed by the applicant and condrtrons of approval as outlined in the attached Draft Resolution of Approval, the degree of non-conformity will be lessened and the use will have the appropriate land use entitlement Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Conditional Use Permit DRC2006-00510 through the adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval with condrtrons Respectfully submitted, ~' Jam s R Troyer, AICP Planning Director JT DG/ge ~^,~„`' • • B-4 • PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2006-00510 -CASH AND ASSOCIATES ENGINEERS June 13, 2006 Page 5 Attachments Exhibit A -Location Map Exhibit B -Site Utilization Map Exhibit C -Site Plan Exhibit D -Parking Layout Exhibit E -Grading Plan Exhibit F -Machinery Profiles Exhibit G -Site Photos Exhibit H -Truck Turn Analysis Exhibit I -Letter from Applicant Exhibit J -Preliminary Acoustic Reading Exhibit K -Letter from Secondo J Colombero dated May 26, 2007 Exhibit L -Response Letter to Secondo J Colombero from the Traffic Engineer dated May 31, 2007 Exhibit M -Design Review Action Comments dated May 1, 2007 Draft Resolution of Approval for Conditional Use Permit DRC2006-00510 • B-5 ~ ~ ~ o a vsWi s ~ ~ ~ i o gcc V O ~ ~ _ W y v ~ ~ ~ ~ ° .;.~ ~ a y ~` ~ ® Z ~ O , a ~ v W a a ga 8 ~~ ~ „ ~ a 3 K~: ~o ~ v ~~ ~~sj ~~~^d ayL^n l Cn ~~ u{ Y n3 ~~ ~ ~ ~' ~g ~ a ' ~~ 3 A g ~~go ~$~^~ Y~~ ~ ~~~ EXHIBIT A O ~^ ~yay gggg d~ S .~~ ~~ k~ ~~ bb~ to x & R _ L ~ _ ~~ zo ss ~~ b$ Sg ~n 3n ~~ g~ 3~ s~ se !~ ~^ ~c g~ ~~`u °~ ~ ~ af` d 2 ~63 ~3 ~° ~ ~~3 a~3 ~~a Bea a~N ~~ }~ is ~~a g°~ Ana a,.~ ~e$ e~ ~'a o.~ o_s ~aa ~a ~~ ~a~ F~ d~~ ~~~ H ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ ~ a ~ ~ ~~ ~ e e e Z a ~ {p ~,, .t ~ ~ ~ e c s z a " w ¢ ~ i s r a..,r s ~ O ~ # ~ ~ of ~a ~ A @ @ d @ Y "'.' S Y ~' ,,,,. ,~ t -~-~-~'r'-, w k ~ t , ~ a- Ji '~ " d ~ c c c 3 g i a } s ~ `y~~ ! I ~ } ..~l,Yf~ ~ ~ €~~ ~ B- Z 0 U O J 0 o~ a; J Q i W Q ~o ~~ _~ U u ~ ~ n U ~ ~ W U W ~ O N L Dc W ~~ F ~r a 0 t W 0 ~~ H~ ~ Qw 5`5~ ~ m~ U (n Q~° G Q Z x ~ a ~y " ~" Z K _ =w a_ (n z m~ Q ~ Uw y 0~~~ ~~ -~~v~~ ~_ ~ ~`~ N Z 0 S • • • • • a w ° ~o ~~ o S w n: O °o z ° °° > ~ ° ~ ° a~i w ~ z O '~' I=i _~ U v l w, '° a i ~ U z 50 ~° Qa ~ ~ i ~ m a ° h ~ a j, O U v o > > U v O Z o z °~ ~ l _ m m W K °~ i W ^ m ° JJS ~ ^ ~ z z u YN m 6 g 01 n a i ~ m ° W °m m m w v ~ n° J I^7 ~ I n? ju ~ ~ w,~ a~ ~~ Y a wn n y u do ~ Ci"° I g Q Q U . .. ° w S ° ¢ z ~ or o N 4 W ° u 1O ~ ~ e o In a v°i ° ~ ~ o^ ~ i ° n° °~ ° ~ N' w o ~ ° ° -{ z Z ~ O~ i ,°°w in W Z ~ J .°05 I ~ c Z E 7,. ] ~ w ~ w w ~ w ~ ~9 N I O ~ ZO Z< J z n o^ I o~ w~ a ~o W O D O p O W tx W '^Z O p z " ~< x W ¢ F W J%C ~ W ~ A NxC a ?~ xNx_ ° ~ I z i I ~l.l I I I O o N" ~~ R_ F _ (~ K U 3 m W W Z UI U K UI Y 000000 00~ O 00 V I- N W~ d O ~ W 0000 00 ~ - W J I I C ~~ w ~< ~ w ~ Q ~ e N ~o~ ~ i ~ ~ i ~~ ~ ~ ~~~ I o S a o q q ~~4o 3~pi wln ~ ¢ ~i~n ~ ~ ° ~a ' ' ¢U O ~ N j I r ~ ~ ~ ~ O y W 3/I d b O Nb M113 J - e ~ c 5 o i ....~._ _" f (n w ~ /~ _ \ I~ w ~r i / + I ~ I` ~ I ~ i \~ Q F ~~ ~ ~ I I I ~ ~ ; I ~ ~ / 1 ~../ / ~ ~ I~ I ~~~ I ~ I U ~ ~, \ U oa ~~ ~ ~ / ~ I II V LL g ~g ^ 1 I ~~ W ' I I ~ Q 0~ ~~~w Z \ W ` f {~ Q Z f Q I ~ L II w I 4 . ~z ~ ._ I W-~n ~ni J I <i I I b Div ~I ~ \ rc m ~oJ I~~ of t I i ~ ~ozm So'-w ~ 2 U / I $ I Ooi° I ~ i Inj l I z~p° n ~~~ `~ za \ w ° I I o~~ ° n W I ~~°wn G~ UW lav l I I l ~ SUW `a ar°.I~ N an z° ~~ \ / I ~`ul°.I~ = i ~ I , ? gxm / 1 I ?W 1 I~ ~~nd 1 / I O e I i Wa I I I I~ I I ~ 3m UOp ul al°~~ ' I ~ I I I ~~ I I I, I / 1 I ~ I J y"~ ~ s~ , ° P°_~ n _ .j II I I ~ s I o z a I -nz zoWWn ~W i 1 ~ _ C - -r G _' I~ ~ ,- ~ I ~ G~~~ I Kwon i ~a~~ ~ I I _ t ~ - „ ~, ~~? rz 9 IN91 F _ I a?~ I ~ ~ I I 2785 ' ~ ~ I a a `wml ~2m ~ I - , ~ ~ i ° ~n° I 1 8g ~ ` ~ ~ ~ ~ / I I - I ~~_~ ~S I i I I ~ (l I ' ~ I ~ _ I i - ' '~ ~N G W .. ~ I I I I C _ 0 ~ ~ I 1 I, I I ` 1 I _ u O n I ~aH~ I I _ n 5 J g I r~ I ' ~J I I 4' ~ ~ I I ~ ~ III I 1 ~+ I ~pw - I I I I LL~ ' , I I ~ ~ ?r~ W Z ZOQ ~ ~ I- m ~N w / O m \ ~~ I 3 rn°~ O~ZQ I °a ~i g 7 w UD m x ~ 3 I I ~b _ o I uc~ _ , I ~ I Z z! 05 aa,., _ZU YPYU >> / / s°b 11? I Zw Z I ~ W I^ - W W7 prv / wuwn \ J ~ ~3 W " ~ .- Q I 3 i Iv1 C ~ z mna Fao~ ~I o r' I 1 l i ^I ° In won S°¢ w / \ I m O N~ I I I 1 I Q 2ND / \\ I \ i~ na~ I z ~~ I } I _ I I I ' l /~ / U < n ~ O w \ I m~N N~~ l i i I ~ a o ~ 1 ~ ~ Z _ _ z 9 a ~ ' - n ~ ~ aa~~ Wa~~ -~ I - EXHIBIT ,, B ~ - -_ -------_ __- I ,~ - ' I ; n o B_7 I ° 7swCU.. ouv-m,7~ naao~„ntv a rod lurwa s ue, umnacw. I nff n, uu „o u, inn wti •unm •rlcsr~rr .os A lo+ - to of w >4ro rw w gnntizw>•wf nod maro Ha I I I I~ ~ ~~ I ,_I I ~ ~ ~ I~_ I~ I II ~I 1 =lei it I i~ --, I I~ 'I i ~ ~ ~ I d I { , I I I I I ' ~~1 ~~ ~ Ib ~ Dr I~ I ~ ~--~ ~ ~ Qw w I I I ~ ~ I I ~ ~~~~~ I I ° `u e i V w y=j W~ £ I _ I ~ o a L I i J ~~ a n 0 1 I ~ ~ I ~ °' I as I ~ j I ~ I 3 0 ~ I' I e o ~ I I ~ a a ZZ~~ c~ ICI ~ o ~ O o ~ w~ F _ ~ ~W I~ I I ~~ a ~ ~ 5 ~'~ °= s ., W I ~ = g 0 C o u ~ 8 n € z ° ~ I I~ ~ W Q S ,e ~ ~~ w ~ I ° ~ J C ° I C:i ~ ~ ~ ~ I w ~ ~~ N ~~ ~~ °~ ~ ~~ I I ~ `sx ~N So ~ 3 ° m ~ °~ 3 .~ ~o ~3 I ° ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ I I I I I ~~g I ' I v, w I. ~~ s I i 0 I Qw ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ CI ~ I I U ~ :~ ~.. "W ~ I I ~ ocn< ~~ G ny~y §~~~ ffi s° I~ Q z ~~ ~ ~ ~3E c~7~ '~~ $~ ~ I I ~ Z S~ W ~ n _ II ~ ~a ~ "o B9K 3 SI LLN r ~~~ /I II '~~ I I =w '- (nz $x \ l// I U w ~ ~e ~ 9 -_ I '-- ~ _ 1 ~ s/ ~~e - l-i' ~I I y w ~~ ~ _ ~ 1 r .~ ~ `~~ i ~ ~ ~I I ~"~~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ '~ ~ 9ti ~ ~ I ~ a ~ I ~ ~ i _ _ ~ a I' i` I 7 I I o ~ ~, e I rP ~ I 1 ~ `~ w ~ ~ ~ ®~_~ ~~ 4 ^5 ^ ~ I r~ ~~ - ~~ ' I a g I °° m ~~S ~ ~ I I ~ 18 L1 W ~ ~ }s gj p u = I ~~ .~ . ~ 0 in9 s., ~ '~° ~ ~ pr ~. I¢ ~y' w w G Z f ~ /err/ ~ r~ I ~°a~ ~ f%+I ~ gel T~'j' c°J Z h w W Yd I ~ ~I }.! ago ~ M EXHIBIT CJ' 19n3"`~" B-8 MOtl 35vBX'SiX9 tlLWJtld 9090001lI1dlll5 tlOB00Sitl9X SS3JN3 NVN UgAVI [OOL Of t xe05J3d110 roS peg w 65 f - 20 01 SO Xlvp Igd v - v IOdn] SLr9 w • • • • • • °w ~ ~ ~ EW~~ ~ 8 '^ o ~~ ~ .. o 00 ~ W S ~ NO~ ~o~o U mw U ~~ 0 ~ ~ Y gos _ ~ W 9 9 33 d ~' aW N U w ~ aa~ ° ~ O 4~WLL ° ~¢¢ UZ - rr~yy - N I ZN I U UZHa ~ O ~jiDN ~~ W N ~~g8 ~ o o - °- ~o n rv u '"° w° o o $ C 0 °o G 0 ° ~ 0 °o ~ ~ vi °o N ~° - o ~ > W w 2 U W =?a U ° ~ O Z ° Zd 3 0 W j 7 ~ O Z owow U O K O O Gi Jw~" 4 U O• O N N U W W O Z'w~N 22 ~ U U Z OZ O 3 3 3 m Z ZV ~ Z Z O~ 0 0 0 NIO/I IWIIKU I~ U~ xi b Z U ~i W .-.O a v~~- ^ .-. .W. ^FC 7 N N I~ Z_ N HI 0~ I W BFI ~i6 N~ Z `3 .-.~ I ~ ~~, ~ i- ~~ ° _ ~ i - .- ~__ ~ ~_ ,moo °wo I L~ ( ~ ~~~~ ~B ~ ~~~ ~N I ~ ~ =~s i I ! ~ I® a I ~ i r sr w ~` ~ ~ ~ ®_~ I m=~ I Y ^ ~~ C I I ...U LL I ~~~ w~W B~ N?I ? I I I I ~ a II °~ N ~ .. ~, oa ~ ~ml ~ mo o I ~i~ fall ~ ~ ~I "~ 'mN ~ ®r~ I ~ ,~ I ~ ~~ ii V ~I I? + i ~~ ~~ ~ O i \ \ ~~ ~~ ~~~~, \~_ _~_ _~~ of ~ Zp O~ U goK ~~ a -Wy O C3 EXHIBIT D N~n ~~ a . ~o~. ~~a =3 ~~ ~° .W.m N / w m ° W Z U ~ Z ~x ooN I Z s~ m~~ ~~~ ~ aw w o =~ Z ~~ WN ~m° ~U a o a ~ ~ a ~ n $ ~~.. I g rnQQ g ~ U rn y c $t O O e N V d ~ o o c = O ~.~. C a a °c N N U ~ U ~ O O N~ ~~ aw a ~_ ~~ O~ §- (na $a z Q~ ~` a ~" - Z ~- = W ~z m Q~ Uw yn+ {{ g O~g~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~'-~ .~, ~~ L- aw o~w o~~ <o~ ~W o m w ~~~ ~° w~ O=Z b~~ w a z ~~~ a N S O ~ 3~1 d NONb'M113 r I I L----~ ~~ -- I I li ~ I~ [I I I I o .a I I _ I I \ ~ w = ° I~ I "p I ~ _ - I ~ I 'I y ~ 4 I l U O; o~ ~ N w I p pN 'a& ' II If i I a~ spu ~ Z iz pp ~ I ' I _ _ I - I I ~ ~~ `? 0 aaO ;u; Z - <~< Z wF FF 5 ~ U ~ OU i I I I i ~ ~ I - ~ _ I I II I U pz ;~ ~° O ~~ ~ Le ;Np ao I1 I _ _ J I I ~ Kw , z ~ I I V J ^~ wo p n~ t III I Y I I I I 1 I II ~ Z ~ 5 gW ~~ o~ ~~ I I j~ ~ I I 1 II ~ I I W FD OF ; U h~ Q O F a~ p Z ~ Y - I / J / I~ ~~ ~ z ~~ ~ ~~ '2 ~o ~i I ~ ~ ~I I ~ ~ I ~~I 0o ow zin tJF xp Wzdo 0 0 pN NU ' ~ N ~ ~ a $~ -'7 ~~ mp ~< ~S - `~ zpi °u~~ ~ w ' p °a G w~ I ~~ o ,. ~ $ ~ ~ ~~ I ~ Gp ZU C~ ~O bLL ~ 2 W~ N3~ ~ 2 N .O ~. Zy N~ ~ ~. N~pi. ytN1 /I „ ~ II I ~ w~ ... ~ ~ ~~ ~m 3~ I 5~ I~K l aa K p ~ Z2. ~ ¢ ~2 VO ~z ~~ ~z Dr-` Z~~ rccJ~ Q i~ rc~ aN iNx ¢ ~ p I i¢ 177 z~ ~I~ L $ I G -" / ~ ~ ~ lii ~ ~ ~y ~_ .. 3 1 _ _ _ . ~ r _ ...- 1 i I II I I 8 I ' e I I ..o u L l~ _ Vy I _ I ~ I o I I I I ~$ ~~ I I I I 9'0o III * ¢ ~ '~_ 'd _LI _ ^7 ~ ~ !~. l_l~ ~8 ~ ~~ _ i / W~ J ~L~ ~~~ I ~ ®~°~ ~~ Ii ~ ~o~ I as ~~ '_~ ~-, Ifll rou c g~ ' ~~ I-Il,r I 1~ $~ I ~~ ~~~ -~I III _ I ®~~ II~'II ' I I I - - 1~ ~ ~ 4 ; / I 4 8 ~ ' I;°~ I ~ -u~9~ ~ ~ ~ ~~' ,' ~ 4 ~ I ~ 7 I~I° I ~I m ~ ~ _ s Ii Illll' 7 ~~ ~I / $~ $ V ~ ~ ~ ~ ',',,l~ I I i; ~ ~ ~ I ~;9II ~ ~l ~ ~ ''° I ~~ Iii y W ~~+ ~~,li„ 8 t ~~ _ ~ x .~= - - - - - - _ ->x ~ ---- -- - _ ~; ~~ ~ o~ - / I _ _ zt R ~~~' i ~~ ~5s ~~ ~ I o EXHIBIT E ~ ~ W~~ ~ ~ g ~ ` I _ _ _~ V I B 10 I MJtl 3S9x 5219 tlL9NMd 90906J12Ik3L9 tlOBW92~9x 553JT - LO/01 SO ~Po ~Atl ~Fd ~o L ((y11J 5219 iwou t1 ~~ I I -- I I I I I~ I I~ m m N ~o ~~ '_ ~ ~ I ~~°_~ ~ ~ n ~ a V a n n • m c~ rn c o w ~ ~ {a~~ U N ' LJ O LG 0 fl 3F~ ~ U W Q d N W N ~ u -, o D ~ D [e i `w ~ ~ ~ (n R g H ~ G Q~ S~ U= d~ O~ (n a ~ QZ ~d Q gR '~ Z ~ o K •- U w ~~ • W ~ s oy~~ a~~~~s ~ ~~.f~ ~~ ~~~ a~ Z o • w • • 0 ,,I II III' II ~! . I I I ' ~ l~Yl' I ~~ I~ml 0 e a=$ ~~ W ~ w e ~ U N ~ a 4 D pf n n 0 rn C O N ~ U ~ O p ~'~ ~a111 ~ C a' p v c 0 t ~ o v !C~,I l l j I I I' I I' '! i' I ~~ s ~~~ ~~ ~ ~ I I I I I I II ~ II Q~ ~s . I ~i~"! ' ~ L1 }u r1~ i o I III 11 I I I I I I I o .IIII " I I I I I i l o o '~'I lI~II' III I I ~ I I I I I' I I" ' I I' I I" N` fr~ lil'lll I I III i I' I I I ° ~° I I I rail II~ ~~ I ;.II I I QQSo I I I I ~ n~ I ~~ _~ I I I I _~ I - ~ Z =_ I I I I I ; I ' =w I III I I11 I I ~~~~ I I I 'Il Qu ~ I; ~ I' I I I° I I I i' I I I I I ~w I~ ~1 I I i ~ o I I I, o ~ I o I ~I~~~ ~;I I III ~~ ~I I I I I ~ II ~~~ ~~ I IIIIII I I it I II ' i ~ ~ ~il II I I IIII ~ I I I III 111 I ~ I y 1 I ~~ II I, I ,~~II eon I I ~ I u ~ I I I ~ ; I i ~ ~'. I p ~. I I, ° o f 4444 VIII II I ~'I~ o i I I ili~'II o .I I. i I o ~` ~J~, IYII~'I TI i t l i I I I I I o ~~ I I )-'i i'~~ ~{ i i i i i i I I l i I I I I o J I i I I I I III II "' ~Ii I I I. 18~ I ICI I III I ~ I II III I n 'Y'~~.~~ I I I ~ I ~~' i i, I I I I ~~ II IIII I I II~Il1 II III '-.-.-,-°~ III~!~~ III illll~l I I ~~ I v`~ '~ I~ i I 'll~ III II ~ 'I ~ IIII' III II I ~,il ; 111 'I ~ ~ I I illl I III II I II I 'iili lil'I Illli~ I III '~II I I ~I' I ~ VIII II I III o ti I ( VIII ' Il °o N Ili IIII ~ aRll I it N L I_ ~ 1-J- o°o o a I I I I L~i•~ _~~ o o k ~_ o fi k ~ i .' I o o~ ~' I I I, 11,1-` I ~ III I Tl l l I I '~; x~ I, ~~ I I I I l~° ~ I ~ ¢ I m I I I I I I I N U ~~II I III I ~' Ili 2~p'a Ii l I 111 ~i~ I 2 Mei Ili ~S I i I I I ~I ~n'n ~3 IIII _ I I IIILt ~WW ;III IIII IIII I ~~~I ~, IIIIII ~llil ~WW L. yl I I I V ~~ X111 ~1 ~ I ~I III' ~~~ I~ I I ;III II ~'~T ~~~ I I ~ ~ll~ 1j1 it ~~~ .I q l ~ I IIII I I'I ~lll'~~ ' I II I Q I I ~ I ~ III m, 'li IIII 1 W~I IIIIII III I IiI Ills °o S ' I IC~ lj'il iII II °o I I I I IIII III i i o o m I I I I I I I I I_, I i I i~ _~ III III I III III I o I- I I I I I I I I I l I '~ I i t I ' i l III WTI ' 'l I I IIII I II ~ III II I I II IIII I _ I 11' I Iili I li I,IIII_;_,I 1 I I 'I I ~'lll'lil I I I I i II ! ~ IIII IIII i Ili ~ IIIIIIII I I' I'I l I ~a o I ~ I l II °o I I i l ~I' I °o ~ VIII I IIIIII °o a w l 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o a o 0 0 0 0 0 W o = - _ - - = W °o W °o ~~~ ~ti ~ti ~~ ~o ° B ~~ ~ ~ _ Hd 909060 Nv1d9119 tlC@OOSLt9N 553~a'3U! l O1Ml19dT' tl1YdOtld NAtl OON ~NNI]3tl~Jd~31 O1M710d~I NWM NJId IlgaVl OOL OS ~re0il3eT'lM - [0 01 50 Po Wd wld ~ w 11 u p epos 13 tlb OO 529 9y 0 9bd EXHIBIT F Q o Zr J ;) aJ n~ 0 n O ~~ ~A-CI fi_.__ 0 o 0 O o-z~ b ~ yb~ o M n ~ o 0 U w Uo ~ N W U~ J ~ °o ~ ~a N o e a U a o Of /J 4~ U O~ C zoE H I ~ o ~ ~~ zd~o a ~~ a = o 0 N N 0 (n w W ~ ~r _Qw u~ r e~ U = tl~ Ow - (na ~s Qa ~ ~ ° ~" z rc - = w ~? m~ Q ~ Uw A y F CC ~y E ?~ve~~ i~ ~ ~~ 1~ ~ ~` 2 O 5 • • • ~~ r • • • Z a ~ o = M O ~ W e ~ wN U 1 '' ~ a a n S ~ - O 1 - ~ N Or C ~ S 00 ~ e ~ ~ ~ U ~ o r ~ g6g = o ~ d~ a ¢~ a m ~~ ~ o = ~ ~ ~ c - C g N ~ U O ~ O D S/ B-IL r w Z~ 4 ~ + 2 tf pop W~ w 6 ~ ~~ \ o - (n W K r, ~ u ~ - Q W 3~ I ~_ ~~ O~ (n a ~,~ Q°z =~ < Se ~ -'^ z d - =w _ (n i rL Q u Uw N v/i Lr ~. ~ a ~~ y CC ~ Oi~ o Y~~w~~ j e/r z-.cr 3~ 1~ ~ 1 I Wo r ~~ ~ 1= ~~ ~ ~~ om V1 h W~ ~ ~ I ~o j z~, n~_ Y (/1 O O Z wF U S O I ~ ~ 5~ w a o ~ j o X ~I ~[I{-92 1 ~ 6 ~ O B13 rna93ewsx-szre sasaeo~nd3us naeooszrex •wz raw uwzn Laoz a . «eon3a~n ^os ~*m io. - co of so rcee rosmru-szn .+~.r~ ro r ,..rp oem » bJd W SLY9 0 ~~ b o vaa I' ~ ~~ ~' ~ t~~ a' U °~~ ~ ~ c~~i} ..+~ Q Q 3 O O i ~J Y Y( I l~ t W _ Q 3 ~ ~f ? O ~ i W W 4 I = t i ~ tlF U ~~~ O V r ~ M. ( K tfT'..(.y~ ( ~ A1'~ 1 t _ ~, r vo ~ ~ ~~ W K lam- ' ~ O ~Q' ~~~ 1 } Z t! Y ~! S U W t ~ v ~~cn W ~_ ~i ~ vii ~!' 7 s O E~ `~ ~ .. O L, ,~ iiI ~s W FX o °w N t+ < f x Y ws 4 _ ~ /~ 1L M W U In ^r.. `~ f+aV~' ~y ~ - 3 O c> h m ~ z O _ __°, ~ l?"~ j( Z_ Z ~k 1.1 { ~` p 6 ~ < u~i -~ "~ O i r 51: t~ x ' a W ~ ~fa T ~ d l~~ ~ S rc ~ ' ` z , x wt+ ~ 0 o ~~o~" " 'p° z U n c~ O_ pE U ~ ~ U O p u c ~p 7 Q C W a co xL W eke ~. A N K ~N . ~ };;~~4yy1 r 1 C%~Yr Fv ~. ,~~.~.„f a 41A:'Nf' ~ , "iC l~e~ ~t'~ w r ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~ w +.t ~' ~ ' g ~~ f~'rt'~ ~ ~ ~ p ~ ~a ` ~ ~ ~ x.: ~ ~~ z 9 ~'+' ' ~` ~ u t ' ' ° ~" = ~ __. ~ W w ~ . r ~ ~1 iii ~ 0 ~~_ ;~ ~ ~ °y i } 'pr ~3 y ~ '~„'~ ~ ~ d ~~ ~ _ ~ i ~ ~~° aNn HJ1VM1 ~. ~ - ~ ! ~.. __._._ _--;_- r-- ~ ~ - _-----3 q ~~ __ ~~ x~~~l 1 i ~*1, ~ ~ ` ~ I ~ ~ '® ~ ~~~! ~® ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ® ~I ~ , -~ --- _ ~ ® ~ i® _ ~® - ~ r ~ _ ~I ~ „ ~ n ~ ~ ~ J ~ ,. , ~ ~ , ~ ~~ , ~ ~ \, ~ ~ \d\ o-= \1 ~Iq® _ ~'~~ ''O ~,\\ i® ~ ~ I ~® ~` I ~® i® s7~F 1 _ / .- ~_ ---- _~II_-_- Cyr = 'I ~__1--_ I / I i r o- ~I ~/ II I _~ i ~ ~ ~ ~, ~~ ~I u ~~ N /, F~ I W ~ // 1 I Z 5 3NI'1 H~1VYV EXHIBIT G 6 14 ~~ H~ Qw U= O ~ (n a aQ ~Z W _~ cn Z Uw ~~ .x mY ~~ s y ~e~~ J ~ ~ "~`~ ~ . € ~ ~~~ • • • • O W i ~ ~ a~ I - PI ___.--- _ ~ -- - ------rt-a--- ----- --- - - _ __- __ P`~~ / 3/1 d b'ONb'M113 v ~ ' _ _- _ _ _ _~ _ _ . I _ I ___ _ _- - ~_ _ / _ _ _- ~ _ ~- - +- °l I 0 oW n wi z oJ~ W u O ~ p 7 ~ Z Z J O OF r~% N ~ a W W d C O~ ~ m ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ i ~ ` p u"i o~°.w ~ u W a w ~ o Q U w0 N U Uv U Z 3 0 o z z z_ p^ z O U O ~ N~ p G x ¢ w n x x W 2 K Y w a w W tt a W 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 --a= - ~~ - - ~ --~- ' J , ~// ,; n q6 / ., J~/ r rr^^~ // ~ vJ /~ \ m i ,\~ ~~ .\ ti s w Q On Z i WI~ I I m I II I~ ~~ - //_ 3/1 d b'QNt/M113 ~ ' ' --- - -J - ' - r - - - - - a fl ~/ - -~ ~--- -~ 'l- -_~- to _ ~~ EXHIBIT H ~ /~ i _I / - - .~1~ _~ -~. I _ ~T mgr ~~^ i I ti ~~ ti ~~ ~ i ~ m ~ ~I ~ U ~' I W / , / ~ I W vl/ ~4 zb e ~ i Q a i~ 2 ~ ~ I 3 W !' ~i ~s J ~/ ~/ ~, IQ~ ~/~ m~ ,/~ ~ , ~ ~ ~ . -i 61 ~w § ~o k ~ ~" p U _ WN W p ~ e na o ~ C~ 00 ~~ U aO C C ~ o Z c z a v 0 s N ~ ~ a U Y 0 0 K F- ~ G QW ~A U= `~ ~~ ~~ Na QQ ~~ ~p 8~ Z K W U? ~~ y a CQ ~ o~~ -~~ ~~.~ i~ ~ 1~ ~~ z 0 5 ~~ ~U ~~ ~2 ~~ tiQ xg u~ ~D~ ~f / ~- ~ ~ ~- i,f ~ ~ ~ ~o Q I~ I ~~ l® 4 ~I® ~~f LL~ ~ / ~ ~ I Iy® -1 ~ ' `~® O $I ~® \ . ~ i ~® \ ~I '' `~ ` s .~ ~ \~~~~` r ~~' m ~ s~ \~ 4 ~ I ____ ~ ,I ~~ - - - a1 f , } J w _~_ I ~ ~ 0 ,_~ W w o~ ~_ ~U FZ u~,~E yW~ moz ~u~ ~~~ r~ -- _ - ~~--1~ _ ~~ ~ ~ ,,, ~~ - ~ , I Y ~^ z - I r v o ` I ' ~ ~ ~I ~ i o ~ _ I oo ~ / ~ U 'I~ ~zp (/ \ -_~_ .--- 42~c°~ j //` ~ I / R~ ~I 0 5 Jm mo ~~~~aa ~ V b ~ V ~ r n Of U O E U ~ O u c a v c G'i T 0 3 ~ ¢ 3 Hr G Qw SA r f~ U = d~ O~ (/')a ~~ (no ~? QQ ~ _~ Z w 2~ < (n i Q ~ Uw n D y I C .Y~~,~k w+~ p~E `r1Ovi1 9 i • • ~y a ~ ~^ o ~ © ~ s ~ n. ~ ~~ wN ~ ~ we o a ~~ a U o Fa x~ ~~ ~aC N S ~ q n ~ N N r ~ W i u IIi1 Y1 mow I _ Y II ~ C C z E z a o~ Y I c ~~ I ~ ~~ W U ~ I~ I ~ ~.__-~ a uui u i ~ ~ ~~~ _ ~ I ` ~ t 6 I ' ; y \ ~ ~ I ~ ~ W ~ ~ P ~ _ ~ ~ ~ > ~~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ s ~ ~ ~~ i I o W ~~ I R ~ ~ I I ~ q Qw 3~ r "_ ~ I _ _ ~ i I W o~ m ~< °~ '1 a~ 2 p / ~ i 3 ® < _" Z N ,~ II ~ a 23U ~ i ~ ~ -_ ~ ~ v GI® =W <- ~ Z - Q ~ 'j I I I' ~ a r i ~ ~ ~ I J 6 c / f CF ^ ~ P GIB ~ ~ ~ J y I ~ ~ ,_f w I ~ ~ ~ C.9 ~ ~ _ ' - ~ ' `~ ' ~r , ~ w ~ LL ~, ~ ® I ~~ ,~ ~ ~ I ~ W - _ i = ® ~ 9 ~ `_' O ~ I ~ , ~ ~ ~ '' h P i I ~ ~~.,,, ~.~ ~ ~'~~'~`~ /' ~ ,. ~ ~ ~® I ~I® ~ I _ _ ,~~ ~ 4~ Y \ \ { Y ` ~~ ~ I® I i I _ _ _ ,,J \\l Y ti~,r w ~a\\~ m it--{ I I _- _ ~ ~~ 4 ` 5 \ ~ `\ ~~ __~ U I ' I - C i ~ ® I < O m I I I I __ __ _ ~ I ) ~I' a IU71 I ~ __ I ~I i{J ry - - - --{ ~ p ~' I s a 0 w o w ~ - l- x~1i-DZT o ~ _~ n B 17 o w•'Id llpaVl (OOZ OC w105]3d M'M +w5 nvl LO O{ SO ^0 Iqd ^~ Iqd MOtl O1f~NOdT' 909080'M'1d3115 D IIdN SLM wowi~ tlOB005L~9~ SSiJS/dtlld lllMdOtld 00 ~J\s w op ~upio~l3 bJd 00 11' sL ONfi H 0W3ti Od~V ~W '+~ ~d ] ~Wd ~: Pacific Coast Recycling LLC 482 Pler T Avenue, Berth 118 Long Beach, Callfornla 90802-6209 562 628 8100 Fax 562 435 0930 Re 8822 Et~wanda Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91739 Pacific Coast Recycling LLC (PCR) operates an industrial metal shredding facility at its Rancho Cucamonga branch PCR pr~martly shreds automobile bodes and tin products such as appliances ~n order to recycle the inherent metals that may be otherwise sent to the county landfills The scrap material ~s purchased from auto dismantlers and scrap metal recyclers located m Rancho Cucamonga and the neighboring communrt~es of San Bernardino and Riverside counties The recycled ferrous metal product from the shredding process is sold as prime meta] feedstock to steel mills such as the adjacent Rancho Cucamonga fac~l~ty of Tamco Steel, an advanced steel mim-mill that recycles scrap metal into re~nforc~ng bar (rebar) used in construction The industrial shredding operation was started in approximately 1973 PCR acquired the facility on April 1, 2003 from S~msMetal America PCR normally operates 2 shifts Monday to Friday and day shift on Saturday employing 48 full-time personnel from local commumt~es Depending on intake volume, PCR • occasionally works up to 24 per day, 7 days per week to reduce inventory of unprocessed scrap This PCR shredding facility reclaims valuable secondary materals for reuse into new products, conserves natural resources and contributes to the better use of d~min~shing landfill capacity through recycling Recycling one ton of steel saves 2,500 pounds of iron ore, 1,400 pounds of coal and 120 pounds of limestone In terms of energy conservation, scrap metal recycling helps the steel industry save enough electncrty to power ] 8 million households annually (Steel Recycling Institute) PCR works at all times to provide a safe working environment, to prevent pollution and continually strove to improve operations PCR is committed to comply with all relevant Federal, State of Cal forma, San Bernardino County, and City of Rancho Cucamonga safety, health, environmental regulations and business codes The beneficial aspect of this facility improvement project ~s the increased material recycling flow rates with the new state of the art shredder processing equipment and technology The net result will be reduced hours of machine operation and electrcal consumption per ton processed in comparison to the present operation • EXHIBIT I a a • • °m~ ~ i ~s~~o i ~~~ I ~~~ W i ~a~w I >>~m ~W ~< ~~ ~_~~~ ~~ a~ ~W o=~ ~~'°w ~ I VVV111JJJ °~i¢~~ ~ gZSoi irc I W aF1/~fti I I 9~ j a 8 g - - ~ ~I I I~, II I I' I I II III I ~ I i I ~~ I ~ I I ~ I ~ I j __ _-_ I d I I al _~--_ I '~ ~-- I ~ ~ ~I ~ --~ ~ _1~- j --- ~ ri ' I ~' I II ~ _ i' 1~ i~.-_. ,~--I-- ~~ - o ' ~ ~ ' a ~~ @ 1 1 ~ ~ I a 1 j ~~ `/' f, , , ~ I Il' / I'~ r I $ [ ', i 4 i fY ~ III i --' J ~ `-- U '~~-_ _ $_ ~ ~ a ~iI 8 ~ d C 'l II o ~~ ~ o I~'~, = 4 IIII H i ° I ~I ii i III III ''I I I ~, a t~ qI® ~ ~® i® `®~ ~® ~ ~I s o i N i o i I ~ a N we ~~ 7 ~ o U a ~ o O N ~ U O Q~ o ~ C C N ~ Z °> ~ a ~ 0 c ~~ ~~ ~I~Iol~lo ~, W W~ ~~ QW ~~ r U= mq V ~ ~< ~= Qi =a So 2 Uw y~rI~ ~ r/ s T~~eg~p~ 1~ T 6 1~ ~ ~ 6 i= z v o N N S o R' EXHIBIT J B,9 ~o '~~ SECONDO J. COLOMBERO ~ ~- 1003 EAST BALBOA BLVD PHONE (949) 673-6372 FAX (949) 673-0624 NEWPORT BEACH, CALIFORNIA 42661 May 26, 2007 CITY OF RANCIiO CUCA~ONGA ~'1AY 3 ~ 2007 Planning Division City of Rancho Cucamonga P O Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 Re Conditional Use Permit DRC2006-00510 Pacific Coast Recycling Planning Commission RECEIVED - PLANPJING We own property at the Northeast corner of Etiwanda and Whittram Avenues and have senous concerns regarding the replacement of equipment at Pacific Coast Recycling With the ever-increasing traffic in and out on Etiwanda Avenue and the condition of the intersection at Whittram and Etiwanda, we fear traffic~ams well be detrimental to surrounding businesses and commuters, creating a real hazard What kind of mitigations can we expect? The current and future traffic overload needs to be addressed At the present tune there is no signal at Wluttram and vehicles stack up north to Arrow Highway and south past Napa Street, either waiting to enter businesses, or for a train to pass We would appreciate an acknowledgement of our concerns Thank you, Rancho Cucamonga Industnal Center ..E~ Secondo Co ero, Partner /1 Dona Colombero, Partner EXHIBIT K • • B 20 • ` , i RANCHO C,UCAMONGA THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA May 31, 2007 Mr Secondo Colombero, Partner 1003 East Balboa Bivd Newport Beach, CA 92661 Mayor DONALD J KURTH, M D Mayor ProTem DIANE WILLIAMS Counczlmemberr REX GUTIERREZ L DENNIS MICHAEL SAM SPAGNOLO Cety Manager 1ACK LAM, AICP SUBJECT REQUEST FOR TRAFFIC SIGNAL AT THE INTERSECTION OF ETIWANDA AVENUE AND WHITTRAM AVENUE Dear Mr Colombero, N- Thank you for your interest In traffic safety In your letter, you expressed the desire for the installation of a traffic signal at the intersection of Etiwanda Avenue and Whittram Avenue The City of Rancho Cucamonga also desires to install a traffic signal at this intersection • However, the primary obstacle that is preventing us from installing a traffic signal at thls intersection is that we do not own the right-of-way needed on the north east corner In your letter, you indicated that you are the owner of the property on the north east corner If you would be willing to dedicate the~nght-of-way that the City needs to build a traffic signal, then the City will prepare the necessary legal descriptions, and plans to widen Etiwanda Avenue and to install a traffic signal at this intersection at no cost to you The City has the funds necessary to widen Etiwanda Avenue and to install a traffic signal However, we do not have the funds to purchase property through condemnation If you are agreeable to the dedication right-of way, please send your written confirmation to me City staff will then prepare the necessary legal documents Etiwanda Avenue is a designated as a Mayor Arterial street in the City's General Plan The right-of-way needed for a Mayor Arterial street is 100 ft, or 50 ft on each side of the centerline According to the San Bernardino County Assessor's Maps, the existing right-of- way line is at 30 ft east of centerline Therefore, we will need a dedication of 20 ft of right- of-way on Etiwanda Avenue Whittram Avenue is designated as a secondary highway in the CTty's General Plan The right-of-way needed for a secondary highway is 88 ft or 44 ft on each side of the centerline According to the San Bernardino County Assessor's Maps, the existing right-of-way fine is at 30 ft east of centerline Therefore, we will need a dedication of 14 ft of right-of-way on Whittram Avenue • EXHIBIT L camonga, CA 91729 • Tel 909 477-2700 • Fax 909 477-2849 • www ci rancho-Cucamonga ca ue B21 PAGE 2 The right-of-way dedication needed has been shown in red on the San Bernardino County Assessors Map No 229-16 • if you should have any questions or need additional information, please call me at (909) 477-2740, extension 4011 Sincerely, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Engineering~Division 1~l ` J n Gillespie, P E Traffic Engineer C. William J O'Neil, City Engineer Dan James, Senior Civil Engineer • • 10500 Civic Center Dr • P O Box 807 • Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 • Tel 909 477-2700 • Fax 909 477-2849 • www ci-rancho-cucamnonga ca us B 22 DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS • 8 10 p m Donald Granger May 1, 2007 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2006-00510 -CASH AND ASSOCIATES ENGINEERS - A request to replace the existing Pacific Coast Recycling automobile shredding and ferrous metal recycling plant with updated equipment on approximately 5 acres of land in the Heavy Industrial Distract (Subarea 15), located at 8822 Etiwanda Avenue - APN 0229-131-15 This project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15301 (Class 1 Exemption -Existing Facilities) Design Parameters The project site is located approximately 650 feet west of Etiwanda Avenue, dust north of the Metrolink railroad line The entrance to the site is via an access license agreement from Etiwanda Avenue To the north is Ameron, a manufacturer of large diameter pipes, and to the south is an electrical generating facility To the west is Ameron, to the east, across Etiwanda Avenue, are a variety of industrial uses and one legal non-conforming restaurant The project site is generally surrounded by large-scale, heavy-impact industrial uses The recycling facility has been in operation as legal non-conforming under different entities, prior to the City's incorporation Based upon a review of business licenses, the operation began in 1970 The operation is engaged in shredding of automobiles and the recycling of ferrous • materials The applicant is proposing to replace aging shredding and ferrous recycling equipment with newer, more efficient equipment The replacement of the existing equipment will increase the level of non-conformity There are several single-story support structures on the site, such as a maintenance building, administration building, and rejects bay The applicant is proposing to provide screening from the Metrolink railroad by planting a row of Fraxinus Velutina The replacement of the equipment will most likely result in lowering the sound levels generated by the machinery The applicant will be replacing the existing 60-foot light poles with 25-foot light poles that meet the Development Code requirements Staff Comments The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion Major Issues The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this project Since the project involves the changing out of the existing equipment and the modernization of an existing non-conforming use, staff has not identified any mayor issues Secondary Issues Once all of the mayor issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues Staff recommends the following enhancements to the Site Plan in order to lessen the degree of non-conformity • Provide an employee outdoor eating area with tables, benches, and shade EXHIBIT M B 23 DRC ACTION AGENDA DRC2006-00510 -CASH AND ASSOCIATES ENGINEERS May 1, 2007 • Page 2 Because of public visibility from the Metrolink rail line, replace the existing chain link fence with decorative wrought iron All non-conforming signage shall be replaced along Etiwanda Avenue frontage Provide decorative, view obstructing gates along Etiwanda Avenue frontage Policy Issues The following items are a matter of Planning Commission policy and should be incorporated into the project design without discussion All parking stalls shall be striped and designed to City Standard 2 All outdoor furniture (tables, benches, trash receptacles, bollards, etc) shall be uniform Staff Recommendation. With the improvements proposed by the applicant and the Secondary the Issues addressed to the satisfaction of the Design Review Committee, the degree of non-conformity will be mitigated Staff recommends approval of the project, subject to the Secondary Issues outlined above being resolved to the satisfaction of the Committee Design Review Committee Action Members Present Munoz, Stewart, Diaz • Staff Planner Donald Granger The Committee approved the project as presented with the following conditions of approval • The employee outdoor eating area shall be enhanced with tables, benches, and shade The final design shall be subject to the Planning Director review and approval during plan check The existing chain link along the south property line shall be replaced with decorative wrought in order to provide screening from public view from the Metrolink line Add additional landscaping along the east property for screening purposes The final design shall be subject to the Planning Director review and approval during plan check • ~Xt~s6's'~ t~ -2 B 24 RESOLUTION NO 07-27 • A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2006-00510 FOR A LAND USE ENTITLEMENT FOR AN EXISTING LEGAL, NON-CONFORMING PROCESSING FACILITY OPERATED BY PACIFIC COAST RECYCLING AND TO REPLACE EXISTING, OUTDATED AUTOMOBILE SHREDDING AND FERROUS METAL RECYCLING PLANT FACILITIES WITH MODERNIZED EQUIPMENT ON APPROXIMATELY 5 00 ACRES OF LAND IN THE HEAVY INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT (SUBAREA 15), LOCATED AT 8822 ETIWANDA AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN 0229-131-15 A Recitals 1 Cash and Associates Engineers filed an application for the issuance of Conditional Use Permit DRC2006-00510, as described in the title of this Resolution Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Conditional Use Permit request is referred to as "the application " 2 On the 13th day of June 2007, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date 3 All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred • B Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows 1 This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on June 13, 2007, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows a The application applies to the property located at 8822 Etiwanda Avenue, with a lot depth of 630 feet and which is presently improved with a legal, non-conforming processing facility operated by Pacific Coast Recycling, and b The property to the north of the subject site is zoned Heavy Industrial (Subarea 15) and is developed with a heavy manufacturing use, Ameron Pipe, the property to the south is zoned Heavy Industrial (Subarea 15) and is developed with an energy generating facility, Reliant Energy, the property to the east is zoned Heavy Industrial (Subarea 15) and is developed with a manufacturing use, Bernell Hydraulics, and the property to the west is zoned Heavy Industrial (Subarea 15) and is developed with a heavy manufacturing use, Tamco Steel, and c The present use is a legal, non-conforming processing facility that involves the shredding of ferrous and non-ferrous materials that has been operating prior to the City's incorporation in 1977 Under the City's Development Code, processing facilities require the review • and approval of a Conditional Use Permit by the Planning Commission, which the applicant filed for with the Planning Department Throughout the review process, the applicant has diligently worked with City staff from multiple departments improving the site and lessening the degree of non-conformity, and B 25 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 07-27 DRC2006-00510 -CASH AND ASSOCIATES ENGINEERS June 13, 2006 Page 2 d The applicant is proposing several site improvements and enhancements including, but not limited to, the installation of parking stalls, improvements to the employee outdoor eating area, the removal of non-conforming signage, the removal of non-conforming light poles and making public improvements to Etiwanda Avenue, thereby lessening the degree of non-conformity, and e The removal of the existing, outdated equipment and the installation of modernized equipment will result m greater recycling flow rates, thereby reducing electrical consumption per ton, and f The existing use predates the incorporation of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and has no land use entitlement on file Approval of Conditional Use Permit DRC2006-00510 will provide the appropriate land use entitlement and lessen the degree of non-conformity for the existing facility and will facilitate compliance with the City's Development Code 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows a The proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located • b The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or • improvements in the vicinity c The proposed use complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code 4 The Planning Department Staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines The project qualifies under the Class 1 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15301 (Existing Facilities) because the scope of the project consists of minor alteration to the existing facilities, consisting of the changing out of the existing industrial and mechanical equipment with modern industrial and mechanical equipment, therefore, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment Further, the modern equipment will be more energy efficient per recycled ton, and noise generation levels will likely be reduced In addition, there is no substantial evidence that the project may have a significant effect on the environment The Planning Commission reviewed the Planning Department's determination of exemption, and based on its own independent judgment, concurs in the staff's determination of exemption 5 Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference Planning Department 1) The project will be developed in accordance with plans on file in the Planning Department as approved and conditioned by the Design Review Committee (DRC) on May 1, 2007, as stated m the Design Review Committee Action Comments Listed below are conditions of B 26 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 07-27 DRC2006-00510 -CASH AND ASSOCIATES ENGINEERS June 13, 2006 . Page 3 approval from the DRC that shall be adhered to during the plan check process The employee outdoor eating area shall be enhanced with tables, benches, and shade The final design shall be subject to Planning Director review and approval during plan check The existing chain link along the south property line shall be replaced with decorative wrought iron in order to provide screening from public view from the Metrolink line Final design shall be subject to Planning Director review and approval during plan check Add additional landscaping along the east property for screening purposes The final design shall be subject to Planning Director review and approval during plan check 2) Approval is granted to operate a processing facility at 8822 Etiwanda Avenue The physical expansion of the processing facility, or the intensification of the use beyond what is specifically approved by this Conditional Use Permit as outlined in the Title Block of this Resolution, shall require review and approval by the Planning Commission • 3) This approval shall expire if Building Permits are not issued or the approved use has not commenced within 5 years of this approval date 4) Signs require the submittal of a separate Sign Permit application for review and the approval by the Planning Director prior to installation Within 90 days from the adoption date of this Resolution, all non-conforming signage shall be removed The applicant shall obtain all necessary permits for new signage All new signage shall meet the requirements of the City's Sign Ordinance 5) The business shall operate in conformance with the performance standards as defined in the Development Code and adhere to all conditions of this Conditional Use Permit If the operation of the approved use causes adverse effects upon adjacent businesses or operations, the Conditional Use Permit shall be brought before the Planning Commission for consideration and possible termination of the use 6) The facility shall operate in conformance with the performance standards as defined in the Industrial Area Speafic Plan including, but not limited to, noise levels 7) Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with any sections of the Development Code, State Fire Marshal's regulations, the • requirements of the Air Quality Management District or Health Department, the Uniform Building Code, or any other City Ordinances B 27 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 07-27 DRC2006-00510 -CASH AND ASSOCIATES ENGINEERS June 13, 2006 Page 4 8) The applicant shall agree to defend, at his sole expense, any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition 9) Upon installation of the new equipment, a sound study prepared by an acoustical engineer and shalt be submitted to the Planning Director demonstrating compliance with the performance standards for the Heavy Industrial District If the sound levels exceed the allowable maximum noise levels, the acoustic engineer shall recommend mitigation measures to bring the noise levels into compliance Following the installation of any necessary mitigation measures, a sound study shall be prepared to verify the adequacy of the mitigation measures Engineering Department • 1) Etiwanda Avenue frontage across the access property • (APN 0229-131-21) owned by AT&SF Railroad shall be fully improved to City "Mayor Arterial" Standards including but not I~mited to a) Protect the existing curb and gutter orrepair/replace as required by the City Engineer b) Provide property line adjacent sidewalk c) Extend and hardscape the raised median on Etiwanda Avenue on the north side of the railroad crossing a distance of about 60 feet, as approved by the City Engineer d) Provide a guardrail to protect the existing crossing gate at the south edge of the existing Etiwanda Avenue driveway e) Provide 9500 Lumen HPSV streetlights as required by City Engineer f) Protect the existing R26 "No Stopping" signs or replace as required g) Remove or relocate existing private sign(s) in the public right-of-way at the north side of the driveway 2) The project site does not have actual frontage on Etiwanda Avenue • Currently, the only access to the site is across a parcel owned by either SANBAG or AT&SF Railroad, for which the developer has a license B 28 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 07-27 DRC2006-00510 -CASH AND ASSOCIATES ENGINEERS June 13, 2006 • Page 5 agreement for access from that said owner This developer shall acquire from the current owner of parcel APN 0229-131-21 an additional 10 feet of public right-of-way along Etiwanda Avenue frontage to provide the ultimate right-of-way dimension of 50 feet, measured from the centerline of the street 3) A signed Consent and Waiver form to loin the appropriate Landscape and Street Lighting Districts shall be filed with the City Engineer, prior to issuance of Building Permits The property owner(s) shall provide a copy of the Grant Deed showing the legal owner name(s) and legal description of the property and an updated Title Report for the Engineering Department to use in preparation of the annexation agreement documents (for the actual project site at APN 0229-131-15) • BY 6 The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 13TH DAY OF JUNE 2007 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Pam Stewart, Chairman ATTEST James R Troyer, AICP, Secretary I, James R Troyer, AICP, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 13th day of June 2007, by the following vote-to-wit AYES COMMISSIONERS NOES COMMISSIONERS ABSENT COMMISSIONERS • B 29 ;~ ;;` .~-; COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PROJECT #. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2006-00510 SUBJECT CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR EXISTING, LEGAL NON-CONFORMING PROCESSING FACILITY APPLICANT CASH AND ASSOCIATES ENGINEERS LOCATION 8822 ETIWANDA AVENUE - APN 0229-131-15 ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS General Requirements The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the Clty, Its agents, officers, or employees, because of the Issuance of such approval, or In the alternative, to relinquish such approval The appllcant shall reimburse the Clty, Its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the Clty, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action The City may, at Its sole discretion, participate at Its own expense In the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No 07-27 and Standard Conditions shall be Included on the plans (full size) The sheet(s) are for Information only to all parties Involved In the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect The appllcant shall be required to pay any applicable Flsh and Game fees as shown below The project planner will confirm which fees apply to this project All checks are to be made payable to the Cierk of the Board of Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to the Planning Commission or Planning Director hearing a) Notice of Exemption - $50 X b) Notice of Determination - $50 c) Mitigated/Negative Declaration - $ 1,850 d) Environmental Impact Report - $2,550 ~C-1-05 I \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM12007 Res & Stf Rpt\DRC2006 00510StdCond 6-13 doc Completion Date -/-/- -/-/. _/-/. B 30 Project No DRC2006-00510 Completion Date B. Time Limits 1 Conditional Use Permit, Variance, or Development/Design Review approval shall expire If _/_/ building permits are not Issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval No extensions are allowed C. Site Development 1 The site shall be developed and maintained In accordance with the approved plans which Include _/_/_ site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, and Development Code regulations 2 Revised site plans and building elevations Incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be _/_/_ submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the Issuance of building permits 3 All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street Improvement plans shall be coordinated for _/_/_ consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first 4 Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all _/_/_ other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans In effect at the time of building permit Issuance 5 All building numbers and individual units shall be Identified In a clear and concise manner, _/_/ including proper illumination _ 6 All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property / / owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the Clty Proof of this landscape _ _ _ • maintenance shall be submitted for Planning Director and Clty Engineer review and approved prior to the Issuance of building permits D. Shopping Centers 1 Graffiti shall be removed within 72 hours / / E. Parking and Vehicular Access (indicate details on building plans) 1 All parking spaces shall be 9 feet wide by 18 feet long W hen a side of any parking space abuts a building, wall, support column, or other obstruction, the space shall be a minimum of 11 feet wide 2 All parking lot landscape islands shall have a minimum outside dimension of 6 feet and shall contain a 12-Inch walk adjacent to the parking stall (including curb) F Landscaping 1 Existing trees required to be preserved In place shall be protected with a construction barrier In _/_/_ accordance with the Municipal Code Section 19 08 110, and so noted on the grading plans The location of those trees to be preserved In place and new locations for transplanted trees shall be shown on the detailed landscape plans The applicant shall follow all of the arborist's recommendations regarding preservation, transplanting, and trimming methods 2 Within parking lots, trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15-gallon tree for every three parking / / stalls _ _ _ • 2 I \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2007 Res & Stf Rpt\DRC2006-00510StdCond 6 13 doc 631 Protect No DRC2006-00510 G. Signs • 1 The signs indicated on the submitted plans are conceptual only and not a part of this approval Any signs proposed for this development shall comply with the Sign Ordinance and shall require separate application and approval by the Planning Department prior to installation of any signs APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS NOTE ANY REVISIONS MAY VOID THESE REQUIREMENTS AND NECESSITATE ADDITIONAL REVIEW(S) H. General Requirements 1 Submit five complete sets of plans including the following a Site/Plot Plan, b Foundation Plan, c Floor Plan, d Ceiling and Roof Framing Pian, e Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of the main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams, f Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams, water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning, and • g Planning Department Project Number (i e , DRC2006-00510) clearly identified on the outside of all plans 2 Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a soils report Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are required prior to plan check submittal 3 Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers' Compensation coverage to the City prior to permit issuance 4 Separate permits are required for fencing and/or walls 5 Business shall not open for operation prior to posting the Certificate of Occupancy issued by the Building and Safety Department Site Development 1 Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction All plans shall be marked with the project file number (i e , DRC2006-00510) The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted California Codes, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations In effect at the time of permit application Contact the Building and Safety Department for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts 2 Prior to issuance of building permits for a new commercial or industrial development project or mayor addition, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate Such fees may include but are not limited to City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Check Fees, Construction and Demolition Diversion Program deposit and fees and School Fees Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to • the Building and Safety Department prior to permits issuance I \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2007 Res & Stf Rpt\DRC2006-00510StdCond 6-13 doc Completion Date _/-/- -/-/- -/_/. _/_/. -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- B 32 Project No DRC2006-00510 Completion Date 3 Street addresses shall be provided by the Building and Safety Official after tract/parcel map _/_/_ recordation and prior to Issuance of building permits 4 Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m Monday _/_/ through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays 5 Construct trash enclosure(s) per City Standard (available at the Planning Department's public _/_./_ counter) J. New Structures 1 Provide compliance with the California Building Code (CBC) for property Ilne clearances _/_/_ considering use, area, and fire-resistiveness 2 Provide compliance with the California Building Code for required occupancy separations _/_/_ 3 Provide draft stops in attic areas, not to exceed 3,000 square feet, in accordance with CBC _/_/_ Section 1505 4 Exterior walls shall be constructed of the required fire rating in accordance with CBC Table 5-A _/_/_ 5 Openings in exterior walls shall be protected in accordance with CBC Table 5-A _/_/_ 6 Upon tenant improvement plan check submittal, additional requirements may be needed _/_/_ K. Grading 1 Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with California Building Code, City Grading _/ /_ Standards, and accepted grading practices The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved grading plan • 2 A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to _/_/_ perform such work 3 A geoipgical report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the _/_/_ time of application for grading plan check 4 The final grading plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, _/_/_ submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of building permits 5 A separate grading plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for _/_/_ existing buildings where Improvements being proposed well generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill The grading plan shall be prepared, stamped, and signed by a Callfornla registered Civil Engineer APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS L. Dedication and Vehicular Access 1 Dedication shall be made of the following rights-of-way on the perimeter streets (measured from _/_/_ street centerline) 50 total feet on Etiwanda Avenue / / • 4 I \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2007 Res & Stf Rpt\DRC2006-00510StdCond 6-13 doc B 33 Protect No DRC2006-00510 M Street Improvements 1 Pursuant to Clty Council Resolution No 88-557, no person shall make connections from a source of energy, fuel or power to any building service equipment which is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Council, except that in developments containing more than one building or unit, the development may have energy connections made to a percentage of those buildings, or units proportionate to the completion of improvements as required by conditions of approval of development In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings or units be connected to energy prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of approval of development 2 Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to Street Name Curb & Gutter A.C Pvmt Side- walk Dnve Appr Street Lights Street Trees Comm Trail Median Island Bike Trail Other Etiwanda Avenue X X X X Notes (a) Median island includes landscaping and irrigation on meter (b) Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check (c) If so marked, sidewalk shall be curvilinear per Standard 114 (d) If so marked, an in-lieu of construction fee shall be provided for this item 3 Improvement Plans and Construction a Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights • on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the Clty Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first b Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office in addition to any other permits required c Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer d Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction project along mayor or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer Notes 1) Pull boxes shall be No 6 at intersections and No 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer 2) Conduit shall be 3-Inch galvanized steel with pull rope or as specified e Handicapped access ramps shall be installed on all corners of intersections per City Standards or as directed by the City Engineer • I \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2007 Res & Stf Rpt\DRC2006-00510StdCond 6-13 doc Completion Date -/-/- -/-/. -/-/- -/-/. _/_/ -/-/- -/-/- B 34 Project No DRC2006-00510 Completion Date f Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with _/_/_ adequate detours during constructlon Street or lane closure permits are required A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer g Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks Under sidewalk drains shall be _/_/_ installed to City Standards, except for single family residential lots h Street names shall be approved by the Planning Director prior to submittal for first plan _/_/_ check 4 Intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with _/_/_ adopted policy On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all project intersections, including driveways Local residential street intersections and commercial or industrial driveways may have lines of sight plotted as required N. Public Maintenance Areas 1 A signed consent and waiver form to loin and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting _/_/_ Districts shall be filed with the City Engineer prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits whichever occurs first Formation costs shall be borne by the developer O. Utilities 1 Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, _/_/_ electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards Easements shall be provided as required 2 The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary / / 3 Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the _ _ _ _/_/ Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVW D), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino A letter of compliance from the CVW D is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects P. General Requirements and Approvals 1 Etiwanda/San Sevaine Area Regional Mainline, Secondary Regional, and Master Pian Drainage T/_/_ Fees shall be paid prior to final map approval or prior to building permit issuance if no map is involved 2 Anon-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all _/_/_ new streetlights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to building permit issuance if no map is involved 3 Prior to the issuance of building permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall _/_/_ be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program The deposit is fully refundable if at least 50% of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City Form CD-1 shall be submitted to the Engineering Department when the first building permit application is submitted to Building and Safety Form CD-2 shall be submitted to the Engineering Department within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition project • I \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2007 Res & Stf Rpt\DRC2006-00510StdCond 6-13 doc B 35 Project No DRC2006-00510 Completion Date APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DEPARTMENT, FIRE PROTECTION CANNING SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING ONDITIONS SEE ATTACHED • • I \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2007 Res & Stf Rpt\DRC2006-00510StdCond 6-13 doc B 36 tdoxo~ _ ~ Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection _, • ~ n District P' T ~~~ Fire Construction Services STANDARD CONDITIONS January 24, 2007 Pacific Coast Recycling New Shredder and Facility Improvements CUP 8822 Etiwanda DRC2006-00510 THE FOLLOWING STANDARD CONDITIONS APPLY TO THIS PROJECT The RCFPD Procedures & Standards which are referenced in this document can be access on the Web at http //www ci rancho-Cucamonga ca us/fire/index htm under the Fire Safety Division & Fire Construction Services section Search by article, the preceding number of the standard refers to the article Chose the appropriate article number then a drop down menu will appear, select the corresponding standard FCS-1a Specific General Conditions -Fire Protection Engineer . 1 Applicant shall retain a Fire Protection Engineer (as approved by the Fire District) for all phases of this project The Engineer shall provide a technical report regarding the fire protection aspects of this project and overall operations of the facility The Engineer shall work closely with the District The report shall address the following fire prevention and fire protection features • Fire protection systems (it may include mobile and fixed monitors) • Fire Detection systems • Hazardous materials storage and disposal • Firefighting water containment and treatment during an incident at the site • On-site and off-site storage and transportation of F-500 firefighting wetting agent • Storage arrangements and site management of combustible materials • The report is not limited the items listed here FSC-1 b Public and Private Water Supply Design guidelines for Fire Hydrants The following provides design guidelines for the spacing and location of fire hydrants a The maximum distance between fire hydrants in commercial/industrial projects is • 300-feet No portion of the exterior wall shall be located more than 150-feet from an approved fire hydrant For cul-de-sacs, the distance shall not exceed 100-feet B 37 b The preferred locations for fire hydrants are At the entrance(s) to a commercial, industrial or residential protect from the • public roadways ii At intersections iii On the right side of the street, whenever practical and possible iv As required by the Fire Safety Division to meet operational needs of the Fire District v A minimum of forty-feet (40') from any building c If any portion of a faality or building is located more than 150-feet from a public fire hydrant measured on an approved route around the exterior of the facility or building, additional private or public fire hydrants and mains capable of supplying the required fire flow shall be provided d Provide one fire hydrant for each 1000 gpm of required fire flow or fraction thereof FSC-2 Fire Flow The required fire flow for this project is 4000 gallons per minute at a minimum residual pressure of 20-pounds per square inch This requirement is made in accordance with Fire Code Appendix III-A, as adopted by the Fire District Ordinances 2 Public fire hydrants located within a 500-foot radius of the proposed protect may be used • to provide the required fire flow subtect to Fire District review and approval Private fire hydrants on adtacent property shall not be used to provide required fire flow 3 Fire protection water plans are required for all protects that must extend the existing water supply to or onto the site Building permits will not be issued until fire protection plans are approved by the Fire Marshal. 4 On ail site plans to be submitted for review, show all fire hydrants located within 600-feet of the proposed protect site FSC-3 Prerequisite for submittal of Overhead Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems Prior to submitting plans for an overhead automatic fire sprinkler system, the applicant shall submit plans, specifications and calculations for the fire sprinkler system underground supply piping Approval of the underground supply piping system must be obtained prior to submitting the overhead fire sprinkler system plans FSC-4 Requirements for Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems Rancho Cucamonga Fire District Ordinance 15, the 2001 California Fire Code and/or any other applicable standards require an approved automatic fire sprinkler system to be installed in New Fluff building, (The Fire Protection Engineer must work with the Fire District in the design of the fire protection system and meet the requirements of the District) 2 B 38 • FSC-5 Fire Alarm System The California Building Code, the RCFPD Fire Alarm Standard #10-6 and/or the California Fire Code require a listed fire sprinkler monitoring Central Station Fire Alarm system Plan check approval and a building permit are required prior to the installation of the fire alarm system Plans and specifications shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services m accordance with RCFPD Fire Alarm Standard #10-6 (The Fire Protection Engineer must work with the Fire District in the design of the fire protection system and meet the requirements of the District) FSC-6 Fire District Site Access Fire District access roadways include public roads, streets and highways, as well as private roads, streets drive aisles and/or designated fire lanes Please reference the RCFPD Fire Department Access Roadways Std #9-7 1 Location of Access All portions of the structures 1St story exterior wall shall be located within 150-feet of Fire District vehicle access, measure on an approved route around the exterior of the building Landscaped areas, unpaved changes in elevation, gates and fences are deemed obstructions 2 Specifications for private Fire District access roadways per the RCFPD Standards are a The minimum unobstructed width is 26-feet b The maximum inside turn radius shall be 24-feet c The minimum outside turn radius shall be 50-feet d The minimum radius for cul-de-sacs is 45-feet e The minimum vertical clearance is 14-feet, 6-inches At any private entry median, the minimum width of traffic lanes shall be 20-feet on each side g The angle of departure and approach shall not exceed 9-degrees or 20 percent h The maximum grade of the driving surface shall not exceed 12% Support a minimum load of 70,000 pounds gross vehicle weight (GVW) Trees and shrubs planted adjacent to the fire lane shall be kept trimmed to a minimum of 14-feet, 6-inches from the ground up Vegetation shall not be allowed to obstruct Fire Department apparatus • 3 Commercial/Industrial Gates Any gate installed across a Fire Department access road shall be in accordance with Fire District Standard #9-2 The following design requirements apply a Prior to the fabrication and installation of the gates, plans are required to be submitted to Fire Construction Services (FCS) for approval Upon the completion of 3 B 39 the installation and before placing the gates m service, inspection and final acceptance must be requested from FCS b Gates must slide open horizontally or swing inward • c Gates may be motorized or manual d When fully open, the minimum clearance dimension of drive access shall be 20 feet e Manual gates must be equipped with a RCFPD lock available at the Fire Safety Office for $20 00 f Motorized gates must open at the rate of one-foot per second g The motorized gate actuation mechanism must be equipped with a manual override device and afail-safe or battery backup feature to open the gate or release the locking Mechanism in case of power failure or mechanical malfunction h Motorized gates shall be equipped with a Knox override key switch The switch must be installed outside the gate in a visible and unobstructed location For motorized gates, a traffic loop device must be installed to allow exiting from the complex If traffic pre-emption devices (TPD) are to be installed, the device, location and operation must be approved by the Fire Chief prior to installation Bi-directional or multiple sensors may be required due to complexity of the various entry • configurations 4 Fire Lane Identification Red curbing and/or signage shall -dentify the fire lanes A site plan illustrating the proposed delineation that meets the minimum Fire District standards shall be included in the architectural plans submitted to B&S for approval 5 Approved Fire Department Access Any approved mitigation measures must be clearly noted on the site plan A copy of the approved Alternative Method application, if applicable, must be reproduced on the architectural plans submitted to B&S for plan review FSC-10 Occupancy and Hazard Control Permits Listed are those Fire Code permits commonly associated with the business operations and/or building construction Plan check submittal is required with the permit application for approval of the permit, field inspection is required prior to permit issuance General Use Permit shall be required for any activity or operation not specifically described below, which in the judgment of the Fire Chief is likely to produce conditions that may be hazardous to life or property • Motor Vehicle Fuel-Dispensing Operation • Automobile Wrecking Yards • Compressed Gases 4 • B 40 • Dust-Produang Processes and Operations • Flammable and Combustible Liquids • Rubbish Handling Operations • Hazardous Materials • High-Pile Combustible Storage (HPS) • Liquefied Petroleum Gases • Welding and Cutting Operations FSC-11 Hazardous Materials -Submittal to the County of San Bernardino The San Bernardino County Fire Department shall review your Business Emergency/Contingency Plan for compliance with minimum standards Contact the San Bernardino County Fire, Hazardous Materials Division at (909) 387-4631 for forms and assistance The County Fire Department is the Cal/EPA Certified Unified Program Agency (CUPA) for the City of Rancho Cucamonga 1 If the facility is a NEW business, a Certificate of Occupancy issued by Building & Safety will not be finalized until the San Bernardino County Fire Department reviews your Business Emergency/Contingency Plan California Government Code, Section 65850 2 prohibits the City from issuing a final Certificate of Occupancy unless the applicant has met or is meeting specific hazardous materials disclosure requirements A Risk Management Program (RMP) may also be required if regulation substances are to be used or stored at the new facility 2 Any business that operates on rented or leased property which is required to submit a Plan, is also required to submit a notice to the owner of the property in writing stating that the business is subject to the Business Emergency/Contingency Plan mandates and has complied with the provisions The tenant must provide a copy of the Plan to the property owner within five (5) working days, if requested by the owner FSC-12 Hazardous Materials -Submittal to Fire Construction Services Plans shall be submitted and approved prior to construction of buildings and/or the installation of equipment designed to store, use or dispense hazardous materials in accordance with the 2001 California Building, Fire, Mechanical, Plumbing, Electrical Codes, RCFPD Ordinances FD15 and FD39 and other implemented and/or adopted standards FSC-13 Alternate Method Application Fire Construction Services staff and the Fire Marshal will review all requests for alternate method, when submitted The request must be submitted on the Fire District "Application for Alternate Method" form along with supporting documents and payment of the $92 review fee FCS-14 Map Recordation 1 RECIPROCAL AGREEMENTS for Fire Department Emergency Access and Water Supply • are required on this project The project appears to be located on a property that is being subdivided The reciprocal agreement is required to be recorded between property owners and the Fire District The recorded agreement shall include a copy 5 B -41 of the site plan The Fire Construction Services shall approve the agreement, prior to recordation The agreement shall be recorded with the County of San Bernardino, Recorders Office • Reciprocal access agreement -Please provide a permanent access agreement between the owners granting irrevocable and anon-exclusive easement, favoring the Fire District to gain access to the subject property The agreement shall include a statement that no obstruction, gate, fence, building or other structure shall be placed within the dedicated access, without Fire Department approval The agreement shall have provisions for emergency situations and the assessing of cost recovery to the property by the fire District FCS-15 Annexation of the parcel map Annexation of the parcel map into the Community Facilities District #85-1 or #88-1 is required prior to the issuance of grading or building permits Chronological Summary of RCFPD Standard Conditions PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS -Please complete the following prior to the issuance of any building permits Private Water Supply (Fire) Systems The applicant shall submit construction plans, specifications, flow test data and calculations for the private water main system for review and approval by the Fire District Plans and installation shall comply with Fire District Standards Approval of the on-site (private) fire underground and water plans is required prior to any building permit issuance for any structure on the site Private on-site combination domestic and fire supply system must be designed m accordance with RCFPD Standards # 9-4, #10-2 and #10-4 The Building & Safety Division and Fire • Construction Services will perform plan checks and inspections 2 Ali private on-site fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable prior to delivering any combustible framing materials to the site Fire construction Services will inspect the installation, witness hydrant flushing and grant a clearance before lumber is dropped 3 Public Water Supply (Domestic/Fire) Systems The applicant shall submit a plan showing the locations of all new public fire hydrants for the review and approval by the Fire District and CCWD On the plan, show all existing fire hydrants within a 600-foot radius of the project Please reference the RCFPD Water Plan Submittal Procedure Standard 4 All required public fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable prior to delivering any combustible framing materials to the site CCWD personnel shall inspect the installation and witness the hydrant flushing Fire Construction Services shall inspect the site after acceptance of the public water system by CCWD Fire Construction Services must grant a clearance before lumber is dropped 5 Construction Access The access roads must be paved in accordance with all the requirements of the RCFPD Fire Lane Standard #9-7 All temporary utilities over access roads must be installed at least 14' 6" above the finished surface of the road 6 Fire Flow A current fire flow letter from CCWD must be received The applicant is responsible for obtaining the fire flow information from CCWD and submitting the letter to Fire Construction Services • 6 B -42 7 Easements and Reciprocal Agreements All easements and agreements must be • recorded with the County of San Bernardino PRIOR TO THE RELEASE OF TEMPORARY POWER The building construction must be substantially completed in accordance with Fire Construction Services' "Temporary Power Release Checklist and Procedures" PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY OR FINAL INSPECTION -Please complete the following Hydrant Markers All fire hydrants shall have a blue reflective pavement marker indicating the fire hydrant location on the street or driveway m accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Standard Plan 134, "Installation of Reflective Hydrant Markers" On private property, the markers shall be installed at the centerline of the fire access road, at each hydrant location 2 Private Fire Hydrants For the purpose of final acceptance, a licensed sprinkler contractor, in the presence of Fire Construction Services, shall conduct a test of the most hydraulically remote on-site fire hydrants The underground fire line contractor, developer and/or owner are responsible for hiring the company to perform the test A final test report shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services verifying the fire flow available The fire flow available must meet or exceed the required fire flow in accordance with the California Fire Code 3 Fire Sprinkler System Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler system(s) shall be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services • 4 Fire Sprinkler Monitoring Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler monitoring system must be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services The fire sprinkler monitoring system shall be installed, tested and operational immediately following the completion of the fire sprinkler system (subject to the release of power) 5 Fire Suppression Systems and/or other special hazard protection systems shall be inspected, tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services before occupancy is granted and/or equipment is placed in service 6 Fire Alarm System Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire alarm system shall be installed, inspected, tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services 7 Access Control Gates Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, vehicular gates must be inspected, tested and accepted in accordance with RCFPD Standards #9-1 or #9-2 by Fire Construction Services 8 Fire Access Roadways Prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, the fire access roadways must be installed in accordance with the approved plans and acceptable to Fire Construction Services The CC&R's, the reciprocal agreement and/or other approved documents shall be recorded and contain an approved fire access roadway map with provisions that prohibit parking, specify the method of enforcement and identifies who is responsible for the required annual inspections and the maintenance of all required fire access roadways 9 Address Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, commercial/industrial and multi-family buildings shall post the address with minimum 8-inch numbers on contrasting 7 B 43 background, visible from the street and electrically illuminated during periods of darkness When the building setback exceeds 200 feet from the public street, an additional non- illuminated 6-inch minimum number address shall be provided at the property entrance • Larger address numbers will be required on buildings located on wide streets or built with large setbacks mmulti-tenant commercial and industrial buildings The suite designation numbers and/or letters shall be provided on the front and back of all suites 10 Hazardous Materials Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the applicant must demonstrate (in writing from the County) that the facility has met or is meeting the Risk Management Plan (RMP) or Business Emergency/Contingency Plan with the San Bernardino County Fire Department, Hazardous Materials/Emergency Response and Enforcement Division The applicant must also obtain inspection and acceptance by Fire Construction Services 11 Confidential Business Occupancy Information The applicant shall complete the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District "Confidential Business Occupancy Information" form This form provides contact information for Fire District use in the event of an emergency at the subject building or property This form must be presented to the Fire Construction Services Inspector 12 Mapping Site Plan Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, a 8 ~/2" x 11" or 11" x 17" site plan of the site m accordance with RCFPD Standard #13-1 shall be revised by the applicant to reflect the actual location of all devices and building features as required in the standard The site plan must be reviewed and accepted by the Fire Inspector • • 8 B 44 ~~ \\~ ~~~~ ~ ~~~ ~~ ~, _ r~r,~~ T H E C I T Y O F Rl1NCIIO CUCAMONGA Staff Report DATE June 13, 2007 TO Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM James R Troyer, AICP, Planning Director BY Jennifer Nakamura, Assistant Planner SUBJECT CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2006-00985 -MMI TITAN ON BEHALF OF VERIZON WIRELESS - A request to construct a 48-foot high wireless communication faality in the Medium Residential District, located at 6627 Amethyst Avenue (Fire Station #171) -APN 0202-101-11 This protect is categorically exempt from the requirement of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15301 • (Class 1 Exemption -Existing Faalrties) VARIANCE DRC2007-00087 - MMI TITAN ON BEHALF OF VERIZON WIRELESS - A request to locate a 48-foot high single carrier mator wireless communication facility within 300 feet of residential and within 100 feet of another mator wireless communication facility rn the Medium Residential District, located at 6627 Amethyst Avenue (Fire Station #171) -APN 0202-101-11 PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION A Surrounding Land Use and Zoning North - Multi-Family Dwelling Units/Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) South - Post Office/Office Professional East - Multi-Family Dwelling Units/Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) West - Multi-Family Dwelling Units/Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) B General Plan Designations Protect Srte -Civic/Regional Public Faalrties North - Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) South - Office Commercial East - Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) West - Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) C Site Characteristics The Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and Verizon have been • working together to improve data transmission to fire trucks responding to calls, particularly in the northern portions of the City The applicant is proposing to construct a 48-foot monopine, consisting of a total of 12 antenna panels that will be mounted on the pole at approximately 45 feet above the grade The protect site is located at Fire Station #171 on Amethyst Avenue, north of 19th Street, on the south side of the station The site is approximately 220 feet east ITEM C & D PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2006-00985 - MMI TITAN ON BEHALF OF VERIZON WIRELESS June 13, 2007 Page 2 of the curb face of Amethyst Avenue Artificial branches designed to resemble a pine tree wil- be installed and the cylindrical pole will be embellished with a rubberized faux bark material made to imitate a tree trunk, thereby providing a "stealth" design ANALYSIS A General The wireless communication facility is classified as a mayor wireless communication faality because of its location on the public land Mayor wireless communication facilities are not permitted to locate within 300 feet of any residential structure or within 300 feet of any existing mayor wireless communication facility, except when co-located on the same wireless facility The proposed wireless communication facility will be approximately 110 feet from the nearest residential structure and approximately 190 feet from an existing maJor wireless communication faality As a result, the applicant has submitted an application for a variance m conjunction with this project The proposed equipment will be housed in a prefabricated structure which will be partially covered by a 6-foot high CMU wall to match the existing perimeter block wall of the fire station The proposed Verizon facility meets the screening and the site selection guidelines for wireless communication facilities by providing stealth type design and evaluating three other locations that ultimately did not prove feasible • B Design Review Committee The Committee (Stewart, Munoz, and Diaz) reviewed the project on May 1, 2007 The Committee expressed concerns about the potential noise • impacts from the air conditioning units required to support the prefabricated shelter The applicant provided documentation after the meeting that showed that at a distance of 100 feet from the unit, the noise level is approximately 44 decibels (dBA) This is less than the maximum exterior noise standards of 60 dBA for daytime hours and 55 dBA for nighttime hours as defined in Table 17 08 080-D of the Development Code The Committee reviewed the project and recommended approval C Grading Committee The project was reviewed by the Grading Committee on May 1, 2007 The Committee did not identify any grading issues and recommended approval D Technical Review Committee The Technical Review Committee reviewed the project on May 1, 2007, and recommended approval E Environmental Assessment The Planning Department Staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines The project qualifies under as a Class 1 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15301 (Existing Facilities) because the project involves no expansion of an existing use and there is no substantial evidence that the project may have a significant effect on the environment FACTS FOR FINDING The purpose of a Variance is to provide flexibility from the strict application of the development standards when special circumstances pertaining to the property such as size, shape, topography or location deprive a property of privileges • enjoyed by the other properties in the vicinity and in the same district In considering a request for a Variance, there are five finding under State Law that must be substantiated C & D 2 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2006-00985 - MMI TITAN ON BEHALF OF VERIZON WIRELESS June 13, 2007 • Page 3 by facts in order to approve the request Generally, these findings center around the uniqueness or special circumstances associated with the proposed development of the site, which warrants the approval of the Variance request This is supported by the following Finding 1 That the strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of this Code Facts The General Plan and the Development Code recognize the need for wireless communications throughout the City Verizon is mandated by federal law to provide adequate coverage in areas where they have a license The applicant has demonstrated that there is a lack of adequate coverage in this area to provide support to both the local community and the emergency vehicles of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District This site has proven a most ideal site for wireless communication carriers in the past, as two carriers are currently located on the south side of the property and a third (DRC2006-00352) was approved on August 23, 2006 Nearby sites have proven unfeasible as they have greater height restrictions than the proposed property and would not meet the requirements of the wireless carrier to provide adequate coverage Strict interpretation of the Code would provide a practical difficulty in providing the required coverage for the community and the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District • Finding 2 That there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the property involved or to the intended use of the property that do not apply generally to other properties in the same zone Facts The current use of this property is a Fire Station for the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District The Districts emergency vehicles currently utilize the Verizon Wireless network and the two have been working together to address service inadequacies The wireless network is an invaluable communications tool in the event of emergencies and natural disasters where normal landline communications may be disrupted, overlooked or inaccessible This network can save valuable time and resources during these types of events, but currently the lack of adequate coverage has proven a barrier to the fire service Finding 3 That the strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the same zone Facts By preventing Verizon Wireless to locate a wireless communication facility on this property, they are being deprived of the same opportunity that has been afforded to three other wireless carriers Currently, there is a mayor wireless communication facility in the form of a 50-foot monopole on the site that provides wireless communication for T-Mobile and SprintNextel Cingular was granted a conditional use permit on August 23, 2006, to replace the existing 50-foot monopole with a 70-foot monopine in order to co-locate on the . site Verizon contacted the owner of the pole, T-Mobile, to inquire about becoming a fourth carrier on the site Citing engineering issues, T-Mobile was unable to allow Verizon access to co-locate on the pole Section 17 26 030-5 of the Development Code allows for C & D 3 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2006-00985 - MMI TITAN ON BEHALF OF VERIZON WIRELESS June 13, 2007 Page 4 mator wireless communication facilities to locate within 300 feet of a residential structure or an existing mator wireless communication facility provided that it is co-located with another carrier There is a new carrier, Metro PCS, developing sites in the area, but they are not in a position to co-locate on Verizon's proposed site This site does provide for future co-location should another carrier need to provide coverage m the area Preventing Verizon from locating on the site deprives them of privileges afforded every other mator wireless carrier Finding 4 That the granting of the Variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same zone Facts The purpose of Chapter 17 26, Wireless Communication Facilities, of the Development Code is to regulate the establishment of wireless communication facilities and thereby protect the public health, safety, general welfare and quality of life in Rancho Cucamonga, while preserving the rights of wireless communication providers as well as to establish flexible guidelines for the governance of wireless communication facilities, which recognize the unique land use distribution, topography and aesthetic characteristics of the City The proposed facility is enhancing public health and safety by providing needed wireless communication for the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District • Finding 5 That the granting of the Variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare or materially incurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity • Facts The design of proposed protect is consistent with both the General Plan and the Development Code, by providing a stealth design with the potential for future co-location The proposed location is in the rear of the property, with mature trees adtacent The prefabricated shelter is oriented so that any noise generated by the air conditioning units is directed away from the nearby apartment building The proposed facility will not create any conditions or situations that may be obcectionable, detrimental or incompatible with the surrounding land uses CORRESPONDENCE This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valiey Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all the property owners within a 660-foot radius of the protect site No correspondence has been received C & D 4 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2006-00985 - MMI TITAN ON BEHALF OF VERIZON WIRELESS June 13, 2007 • Page 5 RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Conditional Use Permit DRC2006-00985 and Variance DRC2007-00087 through adoption of the attached Resolutions of Approval with conditions Respectfully submitted, ~. Ja es R Troyer, AICP Planning Director JT JN/rlc Attachments Exhibit A -Site Utilization Map Exhibit B -Topographic Survey Exhibit C -Photo Simulation Exhibit D -Site Plan Exhibit E -Elevations Exhibit F -Design Review Comments and Action Agendas dated May 1, 2007 Draft Resolution of Approval for Conditional Use Permit DRC2006-00985 • Draft Resolution of Approval for Variance DRC2007-00087 C & D 5 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ d ~ ~ ~ ~ ~w a C <~m$ ^ i ~~~~ ~ m3 ~~ ~ '~ ~gbg~ ~ ~s~~ ~ 5 ~ Q~ ~as~ m ~~~ ~ w H ~ ~ 9~ ~ _ w ~ ~ ~ ~i a ~ ~ ~ ~ E ~ r W ~ ~ 71 O ~a Q ~ (`"{~ \ If ~ ~ ~ --I}---~_) ~ ~ I C ~ _~ I ~ \ F 33 I R ~ ;- .~ ~ - - `~ , I--~-o p I I I - - <~ ~ r I ' I I ~~-U I~ ~ ~ "" O ~ I ~- _,', I ~~ ~~ Ali --- _--~~r~-;T;~ o _ - - -a---~-----~- ' a ~' - - - - AMETHYST STREET a ~ ~ J ~ ~ 9 m S ~ ~ 3 £ ~ ~ w~~~~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~~ ~~ W a~ Y 7g~, wfgW~ F~ R ~ ~ o~ s ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ O Y g ~'l4 Z ~~ ~ 4 G71i ~~ 8F $ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ s OOOOOOOOOnC~00000000®O C & D 6 EXHIBIT A - i i IL N I 3 W W~ N ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~a • • • • ~~ ~~ ~- _~~ ~ ~ ~~e ~ ^ _ ~~~~ < U~8€9 a ~ a ~ x ~i~F '~ ~ ~ N ~sF~ ~RS $ o ~ ~ ~~ ~ p ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ oa® F ~ _ ~~~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ n~~~ a s ~ ~ u'~ 6 ~ V v_ ~ ~ ~~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~g ~ ~~ ~b Y _~ FW ~f: ~~a ~~~ €g ZR - ~ ~ ~~ k ~~'a § ~~~ Liss ~m ~ gg ~~ 4 ~°~ S~ ~~~ ~ z ~ ~ ~7 ~ ~ a 8 ~ ~ 7 2? ~~~ ^^ u~~ S w ~ gS2g~ ~ LLO pG ~ M W 9 8 ~ ~ o ~ t M lggg^ E1 p ~ ~ § ~ Yy~1~W~y S ~ ~ FC § ~ ~F~p~{{ g ~~ ~ ~ q ~ E N N 4LL41111 ~ Q Q tl ~ ~~~ g ~ ~B~ ~ ~ ~ g ~ ~ ~ 6 i 3~~~ £¢ ~ ~ ~„ 3 ~ ~ ~~5~ S ~ w I ~ ~ U gg~55 ~ a p .~ I~tl3 ~ I p Q I a~~ b 1 ala Ab~ Rla ~` ~ ~4 a! s a ~ egg ~m I ar . e%m c{} ~ I I 6 ~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~a~~~b~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Y~~~2m&~ai4~~emEeea~~Cb~~~a~~~~~~eeeeet~g~£f~e y >. - / ~p 9a ~ elY ~~ tlbY , ~ ~ s/ ° p I e p g r~ O ~IY ~ ~l'~ HIY rrr///y ~ p/y/p¢• eY ~ ~Y jj !IY ~`! UHE~IY I k '~Y 4 I F O~ Q % A~µ' ~LREh M1O'p q e~ I m N $ ~ m g5 ~ gp ~ a o ~ ~ 7 O UdZ g rZ ~ ~ r p ~ ~ ~_ _~~ _~ _ eel b ~~r Ev n' b = b a „o bae ~ .s gle ~I ~ ~ a W d 4~ - ' ao9 CIC J/pa.,,//cc d ~ I 1 r c sg o ~ oo O p ~ ~ I gl ~ € p n ON ~~ ~^ `r' ~ 3 ~ ~ I ~al ~ i p Y l ~ yy ~ S 5e ~ I I N ~ A s ~ ' i ~ ~b a. @ I Q m E p ~ p p pp~ J~' ~ R 9t1 pt b I. ~~ ?~ pry y/°s ps ~ ~6:c5 ~f~ ~~r ^ ~ ~~4 `~ S~e h~w o~ a ~~ AMETHYST STREET --- ~---- ~~~ „w --~-- R _~~~ ~ G/~.1 ~1~1 1 ~ ~ t ~ °~ ~ 1 ~ ~ k„ ~a £s a I Iz _. _ -Y _a I sJh ,,p ,v ~1~-------- C & D 7 °cb I- i - -- -- w ~9MnNR1 d I~ WY II y I~ la ~C a II ~i ~ ~l ,{ J ~{ ~ ~{ ~ ' L ~~[~ 1 ~ ~~ f • ~- ,~ r~ ~ ~ , *~ ~. k 1'" S ~L~ ~?e S r 4 ~,1 t.`h ~~~ ~ ~w 0 0 ~ ~~ a~a Z 0 -~ T r A ,I~ u ~ w ,~ 4y~~'+lf'Yr ~+r A it W,<~ 'w. 1 Rimfx a`'i tk i} {~ l~ Prepared by ~ Project Name Prepared for EXH I B IT C Amethyst ~' "~"~° 66Z/Amethyst St Ran~r~h~ ~8~camonga CA 9 1737 veriL-lwireless Patchworks ~ (562) 433 5040 _. ssa~aaiMu 6IaA LFL 16 `d~ `~$uoua~~n~ oy~u~~ ~S ~s~(y~aua`d LZ99 5'~~°^^`'';Ed ~S~N~a~t~ Md ao} pa~edaad aweN l~alo~d .(q pa~edaad ~J ~~+~ US 5 r r'~ i ~3~•"k r ~ ri a < ~7~~u~~.'~ ~ ~ N y .~ ~ ~~'I Tt. i i f~ w ,~ s f ~ ~ 4y'Y~ y9 A f'C .t yt`,u~ L'Y ~~' Fr° r"' ~. N W • = O O J \~ I 1r /1 J \ ~ ~'A _ i ~ - t ~ A a~ i f2 z,s ,r~s '_ lrvi sA'`.d ~~ ~~~ ~N ,art^! ' r~ i" xi r r- ~ ~aS ~' r r ~ J r+~d" s d~a ~~ 3" t ,~'~-d ~ ~,~r ~~,-, ~ r,~ s fr w rs~ nH 41 !.~ ~ +t ~ ~ 3 r'1 ~ yy yy '~ ~'" iiF 1~ xS~ v. ~ ~, ~, 1 .~uY ~,i N,t " , d~~ L~ {~~Y ~ ~M~~{~ Fri ~ a~~ i7 ~ k r u s ~, w ~'~~~ ,Y~ c~°c -~_~~, ~ ~~~~ a r* ~`~'f o „ry5 y~'~d<i tt~l d y~ li ~ ~ ~41f F} d u~~ A ~ fX.i ~j ~j ~ ~ ~ OL ~ ~ K JNI 3i ~' Q 25 Z >-~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~~p~ ~ m ~s~~ a a a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ '~ ~bs~ ~ ~ ~ s ~ ~ N ~< ~ ~ ~~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~ add ee ~~ a n ~ - ~ m Q ~ z ~ ~~~~~~~a Q ~ ° ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~~ ~ .~~$'; 7'!'7'~~vm'-mr'ie~'!~- L' ' ."~Fi7~i ~• 9!S 6~:~ n "'Q ~ 5 _~ j \_/" I ~ L m e~M~Q ~ I '~ ~~ A ___~-- __ /,,. - -' ## ~ ~ ~ 3 ~ ~ S 3 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ 3 s ~~~~~g g~~~~~ ~~~~~ ~~ lC~ a $~~ ~ ?$ ?~ .. c ~ ~ ~ ~ ~uf' ~ ~ o ~ r2 ~~~~ ~~qq~ ~~~~ ~~~~~~~~ ~~® ~~ N ~i s x~~ ~ xE z~ Y 4 Y Y ~ ~ ~ s ~ ~ ~ ~ g ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ s 4 z ~~ ~ ~~~ ~b ~7 ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ a ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ _ O 0000 O O OOCUO OOOOOC & D 10~®© 0®®00®®0 EX H I B IT D • ,. . I I ~ v • • ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ d d g ~~ ~ s s ~ as Y s ~- ~ JNI ~ C ~~~~ ^ ? 3~ t ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~os~ ~ ~s1~} W ~ Y ~ ~ d~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ x~ I . ~ ~I ~ ~I ~~ ~I ~~ ~I~ ~; ~I ~V ~~~ ~I~ R fi ~ ~ ~I~ I I ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~WWq I I ~ B I I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ 1 I 1 I IJ ,, I I I/ I I I 1 I I I .Ar ~~ ~ O ~~ I ~ ~ ~ $, ~ ~. ~i~ ~ v ~ < FI~ ~ b i ~ i ~ ~~' Y - ~ - ~X ~~~ 3 y~ tl EXHIBIT E ~` ~ ~~ ~~ Q ~ WQ ~ Q ~ ~w o ~ a ~~ ~ ? Q ~ I I I II ~I ~I II I 1 ~j ~~ I ~I ~~~ ~~~ b 991 HI~ alb I I I I I I I I 1 ~ ~ 1 I I I I 1 I I I 1 ~I I I 'J i l~x!1Ybi9 LW'. ~~ ~~ ~~ ~ &D11 ~~~ ~~ ~~1 pl~ R _ - ~~~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~~~~~ ~ ~ ~I ~~ ~ ~~~ ~~ ~°I< Y 41~ ~ b W w ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ "~~~~ ~a~ 3 JNI ~~ai p~ O ~~~r ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~ ~ ~ ~ N~ ~ ~~ ~o~ s a ~ ~~ r~d Y ~ B He 3 u ~~ ~g~yG W ~~~~ F ~~ U Q Ki s 4 '~ ~ Q ~~~ y ~ ~9 N ~~ ~~ ~ Y ~ ~ v~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ Y~ ~ r ~ ~ L ~ ~I r~ ~- ~, :~a ~r ~x~ ~~,~ ~ ~~ tiou~~ Cd~,~ '~I ~u9 ~ ~ I ` Y~ ~ WI 1~ 4 : L rr~a r , ~C. ~ ~~ s ~, ~ ~a I 1 I ~ ~ ~ ~`- ~ jn$' 1 ~~ ~ ~I,/ ! ~~ {~~ t~F I `'~ FCC I ~ V, dY.{ ~ ~ {~Qy`~f,~~ ~`.y ffflu ryv r ~ - i ' ~ ~ i l~" I I ~ I ' H ~ A p~1'f 4 eh~{~ ~~ A !j ~ 4 ~, I 1 I I ~';5 \\ i ~"t ' ' y,~~ c ~ ' ~ ~ ~,~ I ~ ~ ; ~ s~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~~ 4 ~ I I ~~ F ~I ~~ ~I ~ ~ ~' ~ I P .~~~~I t Z I ,,yl P Ala ~,a ~99Id ~ ~ pp 1 I g I dr~~~,,k~ , i~ ~~~ I~ as ~ ~ 8 F j ~ID ~I I 1 •,} L~~ `~' ~I I $~ ~ ~ I I ~ ~i ~i aJ, V ~ ~T I~ lI~ o b 9 q~ N ~ 9 ~ o a +- J w W J W S ~ H ~ N C & D 12 W • • ..{~ ACTION AGENDA DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE MEETING TUESDAY MAY 1, 2007 7 00 P M RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER RAINS ROOM 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA Committee Members Lou Munoz Pam Stewart Michael Diaz Alternates Richard Fletcher Rich Macias CONSENT CALENDAR (All consent items heard at 7 p m ) (Doug/Mark) ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2007-00076 - WILKUS ARCHITECTS - A request to develop a 6,852 square foot new full service restaurant (including bar) of the previously approved master planned existing Marriott's Town Place Suites on 7 01 acres of land m the Industrial Park District (Subarea 12), located on the northeast corner Milliken Avenue and 4th Street, 11336 4th Street Related Files SUBTPM16282 and DRC2003-00728 (Doug/Mark) DESIGN REVIEW DRC2006-01017 -GEORGE SEITZ -The request to develop a 28,200 square foot two-story office building within the master planned Bixby Business Park m the Industrial Park District (Subarea 12), . located lust south of the southwest corner of 6th Street and Pittsburgh Avenue -APN 0229-341-03 (Michael D /Willie) ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2004-01244 -ABUNDANT LIVING FAMILY CHURCH - A request to modify approved color scheme for new church buildings in the Industrial Park District (Subarea 7), located on the north side of Civic Center Drive, between Red Oak Avenue and White Oak Avenue -APN 0208-354-01 and 04 • PROJECT REVIEW ITEMS This is the time and place for the Committee to discuss and provide direction to an applicant regarding their development application The following items do not legally require any public testimony, although the Committee may open the meeting for public input 730pm (Vance/Cam) ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2006-00223 -ARBORS AT ROUTE 66 LLC - A request to change the land use designation for four parcels on Red Hill Country Club Drive from Open Space to Mixed Use to be consistent with the Mixed Use land use designation at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Grove Avenue, to add these same four parcels to Section 2 5 5 4 Western Gateway in the Bear Gulch area, and to establish a Master Plan Overlay District for this protect site on the Land Use Plan in accordance with Section III 2 4 1 of the General Plan - C & D 13 DRC ACTION AGENDA May 1, 2007 Page 2 APN 0207-011-35, 36, 41, 43, 44 and 45 Related Files Development District Amendment DRC2006-00350, Development Code Amendment DRC2007-00029, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18179, and Development Review DRC2006-00341 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT -ARBORS AT ROUTE 66 LLC - A request to change the zoning for four parcels on Red Hill Country Club Drive from Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) to Mixed Use to be consistent with the Mixed Use zoning designation, establish a Master Plan Overlay District for the project site on the Development District Map m accordance with Section 17 20 030 of the Development Code, located at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Grove Avenue -APN 0207-011-35, 36, 41, 43, 44, and 45 Related Files General Pian Amendment DRC2006-00223, Development Code Amendment DRC2007-00029, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18179, and Development Review DRC2006-00341 DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DRC2007-00029 -ARBORS AT ROUTE 66, LLC - A request to change the table for the Bear Gulch Mixed- Use area contained m Development Code Section 17 32 020 C 3 to include the "Most Case" column found m the General Pian Table III-7 - APN 0207-011-35, 36, 41, 43, 44, and 45 Related Files General Plan Amendment DRC2006 00223, Development District Amendment • DRC2006-00350, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18179, and Development Review DRC2006-00341 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18179 -ARBORS AT ROUTE 66 LLC -Condominium subdivision of two lots with office condominiums m two office buildings on Lot 1 and residential condominiums m 7 Live/V1/ork urnts, 68 town homes, and 23 single-family residences on Lot 2 at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Grove Avenue in the Mixed Use Zone of Subarea 1 of the Foothill Boulevard Districts APN 0207-011-35, 36, 41, 43, 44, and 45 Related Files General Plan Amendment DRC2006-00223, Development District Amendment DRC2006-00350, Development Code Amendment DRC2007-00029, and Development Review DRC2006-00341 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2006-00341 -ARBORS AT ROUTE 66 LLC - A master plan for two 2-story office buildings, 7 Live/Work units, 68 town homes, and 23 single-family residences at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Grove Avenue m the Mixed Use Zone of Subarea 1 of the Foothill Boulevard Districts, including a change m the use combinations and proportions found in General Plan Table III-7 APN 0207-011-35, 36, 41, 43, 44, and 45 Related Files General Plan Amendment DRC2006-00223, Development District Amendment DRC2006 00350, Development Code Amendment DRC2007-00029, and Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18179 C & D 14 DRC ACTION AGENDA May 1, 2007 • Page 3 750pm (Jennifer/Dan J) CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2006-00985 -MMI TITAN ON BEHALF OF VERIZON WIRELESS - A request to construct a 48-foot high wireless communication facility in the Medium Residential District, located at 6627 Amethyst Avenue (Fire Station #171) -APN 0202-101-11 This project is categorically exempt from the requirement of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15301 (Class 1 Exemption -Existing Facilities) VARIANCE DRC2007-00087 -MMI TITAN ON BEHALF OF VERIZON WIRELESS - A request to locate a 48-foot high single carrier mayor wireless communication facility within 300 feet of residential and within 100 feet of another mayor wireless communication facility in the Medium Residential District, located at 6627 Amethyst Avenue (Fire Station #171) - APN 0202-101-11 810pm (Donald/Dan J) CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2006-00510 - CASH AND ASSOCIATES ENGINEERS - A request to replace the existing Pacific Coast Recycling automobile shredding and ferrous metal recycling plant with updated equipment on approximately 5 acres of land in the Heavy • Industrial District (Subarea 15), located at 8822 Etiwanda Avenue - APN 0229-131-15 This project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the qty's CEQA Guidelines pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15301 (Class 1 Exemption -Existing Facilities) 830pm (Michael D /Willie ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18212 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES - A request to subdivide 6 net acres of land into 82 residential condominium units in the proposed Medium Residential District (8-14 dwelling units per acre), located at the northwest corner of Base Line Road and San Carmela Court -APN 1089-581-01 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2006-00730 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES -Site Plan and design review for 82 residential condominiums on 6 net acres of land in the proposed Medium Residential District (8-14 dwelling units per acre), located at the northeast corner of Base Line Road and San Carmela Court -APN 1089-581-01 850pm (Tom/Willie) ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2006-00633 -RANCHO WORKFORCE HOUSING -The request to develop a 166-unit apartment complex on 10 5 acres of land in the • Community Commercial District (the associated GPA and DCA applications propose the Mixed Use District), located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard and west side of Center Street -APN 1077-601-02, C & D 15 DRC ACTION AGENDA May 1, 2007 Page 4 03, and 04 Related Files General Plan Amendment DRC2006-00635, Development Code Amendment DRC2006-00634, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2006-00636 910pm (Tabe/Mark) HILLSIDE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2007-00055 - RUNYAN ENGINEERING - A proposed two-story 4,753 square foot single-family residence located within the Very Low residential district on the north side of Hidden farm Road and west of Haven Avenue - APN 1074-121-14 PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no public comments at this time, ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 10 50 p m • • C & D 16 DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS • 7 50 p m Jennifer Nakamura May 1, 2007 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2006-00985 -MMI TITAN ON BEHALF OF VERIZON WIRELESS - A request to construct a 48-foot high wireless communication facility in the Medium Residential District, located at 6627 Amethyst Avenue (Fire Station #171) -APN 0202-101-11 This project is categorically exempt from the requirement of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15301 (Class 1 Exemption -Existing Facilities) VARIANCE DRC2007-00087 -MMI TITAN ON BEHALF OF VERIZON WIRELESS - A request to locate a 48-foot high single carrier mayor wireless communication facility within 300 feet of residential and within 100 feet of another mayor wireless communication facility in the Medium Residential District, located at 6627 Amethyst Avenue (Fire Station #171) -APN 0202-101-11 Design Parameters The Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and Verizon have been working together to improve data transmission to fire trucks responding to calls, particularly in the northern portions of the City The applicant is proposing to construct a 48-foot monopole, consisting of a total of 12 antenna panels to be mounted on the pole at approximately 45 feet above the grade The project site is located at Fire Station #171 on Amethyst Avenue, north of 19th Street, on the south side of the station The site is approximately 220 feet east of the curb face of Amethyst Avenue Artificial branches designed to resemble a pine tree will be installed and the cylindrical pole will be embellished with a rubberized faux bark material made to imitate a tree trunk, thereby providing a "stealth" design The wireless communication facility is classified as a mayor wireless communication facility . because of its location on public land Mayor wireless communication facilities are not permitted to locate within 300 feet of any residential structure or within 300 feet of any existing maJor wireless communication facility, except when co-located on the same wireless facility The proposed wireless communication facility will be less than 300 feet from the nearest residential structure and less than 300 feet from an existing mayor wireless communication facility As a result, the applicant has submitted an application for a variance in conjunction with this project The proposed equipment will be housed in apre-fabricated structure which will be partially covered by a 6-foot high concrete wall to match the existing perimeter block wall of the fire station The proposed Verizon facility meets the screening and site selection guidelines for wireless communication facilities by providing stealth type design and evaluating three other locations that ultimately did not prove feasible Staff Comments The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion Mayor Issues The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this project None Staff Recommendation Staff recommends that the Design Review Committee review and approve the project subject Design Review Committee Action • Members Present Munoz, Stewart, Diaz Staff Planner Jennifer Nakamura The Committee approved the project as presented C & D 17 DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS May 1, 2006 PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no public comments at this time ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 10 50 p m Respectfully submitted, Michael Diaz Senior Planner • • • C & D 18 • RESOLUTION NO 07-28 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2006-00985 FOR THE PLACEMENT OF A 48-FOOT HIGH MONOPINE WIRELESS COMMUNICATION FACILITY ON 1 02 ACRES OF LAND IN THE MEDIUM DENISTY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, LOCATED AT CITY FIRE STATION #171, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN 0202-101-11 A Recitals 1 Verizon Wireless filed an application for the issuance of Conditional Use Permit DRC2006-00985, as described in the title of this Resolution Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Conditional Use Permit request is referred to as "the application " 2 On the 13th day of June 2007, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date 3 All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred B Resolution • NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows 1 This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth m the Rentals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on June 13, 2007, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby spenfically finds as follows a The application applies to the property located on the north of 19th Street, south of SR210, and the east side of Amethyst Street, with a total street frontage of approximately 195 feet on Amethyst Street, which is presently improved with a City Fire Station, and b The property to the north of the subject site is zoned Medium Residential (8 - 14 dwelling units per acre) and is developed with multi-family dwelling units, the property to the south is zoned Office Professional and is developed with a Post Office, the property to the east is Medium Residential (8 - 14 dwelling units per acre) and is developed with multi-family dwelling units, the property to the west is zoned Medium Residential (8 - 14 dwelling units per acre) and is developed with multi-family dwelling units, and c The application proposes the installation of a 48-foot monopine, consisting of 12 antenna panels with artifinal branches to resemble a pine tree and rubberized faux bark material made to imitate a tree trunk, thereby providing a stealth design that blends with the built environment and meets the goals and objectives of the Development Code, and d The proposed wireless communication fanlity will be located within 300 feet of multi-family residential units and 300 feet of another mayor wireless communication fanlity, and C & D 19 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 07-28 DRC2006-00985 - VERIZON WIRELESS JUNE 13, 2007 Page 2 e The proposed wireless facility will be of sufficient height to allow for future co-location of an additional wireless facility, thereby meeting the goals and objectives of the Development Code by providing opportunities for co-location and the placement of multiple wireless carriers on a single-pole structure 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows a The proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located, and b The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to the properties or the improvements in the vicinity, and c The proposed use complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code • 4 The Planning Department Staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines The protect qualifies under as a Class 1 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15301 (Existing Facilities) because the project involves no expansion of an existing use and there is no substantial evidence that the project may have a significant effect on the environment 5 Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference Planning Department 1) Approval is for the installation of antennas for wireless communication purposes The antennas shall be installed on a cylinder that will be covered with faux material to imitate a pine tree The color of the parabolic antenna and all appurtenant supporting brackets and attachments shall be painted to match the branches of the monopine 2) The wireless communication facility and the equipment shelter shall be constructed in accordance with the approved plans on file with the Planning Department 3) Any expansion, modification, or alteration to the monopine shall require review and approval by the Planning Department 4) The perimeter wall for the equipment shelter shall match the existing perimeter walls for the fire station 5) All equipment necessary for the operation of the wireless facility shall • be contained inside the equipment shelter C&D20 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 07-28 DRC2006-00985 - VERIZON W IRELESS JUNE 13, 2007 • Page 3 6) Signs are not permitted on the monopine and the equipment shelter, except signage required for emergency notification purposes and that required by regulatory agencies 7) The antenna and the equipment shelter shall be maintained in good condition at all times Damaged and/or weathered equipment, including appurtenant equipment, shall be repaired promptly 8) No wireless communication faality shall interfere with the public safety radio communications system, including, but not limited to, the eight hundred MHz trunking system If such a facility is found to interfere with the public safety radio system, it shall cease operations immediately until such time as the problem is resolved to the satisfaction of the City of Rancho Cucamonga 9) Except for necessary emergency maintenance, maintenance of the wireless communication facility and all appurtenant equipment on any day, excepting Sundays, shall occur only between the hours of 8 00 a m and 8 p m On Sundays, maintenance shall occur only between the hours of 9 00 a m and 8 00 p m • 10) The noise generated at the site shall not exceed residential noise standards as defined in the Development Code 11) This approval is contingent upon approval of Resolution 07-29 (DRC2007-00087) Engineering Department 1) The cell tower shall not interfere with existing radio frequency based systems on-site 2) Tower installation shall not impede the delivery of emergency services 3) Tower operation may only be conducted after final inspection and approval by the City 4) A permanent generator should be scheduled to exercise at times during regular business hours to provide least disruption to nearby residents • C & D 21 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 07-28 DRC2006-00985 - VERIZON WIRELESS JUNE 13, 2007 Page 4 6 The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 13TH DAY OF JUNE, 2007 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY Pam Stewart, Chairman ATTEST James R Troyer, AICP, Secretary I, James R Troyer, AICP, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 13th day of June 2007, by the following vote-to-wit • AYES COMMISSIONERS • NOES COMMISSIONERS ABSENT COMMISSIONERS C&D22 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2006-00985 SUBJECT 48 FOOT HIGH MONOPINE APPLICANT VERIZON WIRELESS LOCATION: FIRE STATION 171, 6627 AMETHYST AVENUE ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPL Y TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS ~. General Requirements The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees maybe required by a court to pay as a result of such action The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such partiapation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition 2 Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No 07-28, Standard Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size) The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect 3 The applicant shall be required to pay any applicable Fish and Game fees as shown below The project planner will confirm which fees apply to this project All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to the Planning Commission or Planning Director hearing a) Notice of Exemption - $50 X b) Notice of Determination - $50 c) Mitigated/Negative Declaration - $ 1,850 d) Environmental Impact Report - $2,550 _ • Completion Date _/-/- -/_/ -/-/- 1 C&D23 Project No DRC2006-00985 Completion Date B. Time Limits 1 Conditional Use Permit, Variance, or Development/Design Review approval shall expire if _/_/~ building permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval No extensions are allowed C. Site Development 1 The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include _/_/_ site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, and Development Code regulations 2 Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions _/_/_ of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director 3 Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be _/_/_ submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits 4 Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all _/_/_ other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the time of building permit issuance 5 All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc ,shall be _/_/_ located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the Planning Director For single-family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults D. Shopping Centers • 1 Graffiti shall be removed within 72 hours / / 2 The entire site shall be kept free from trash and debris at all times and in no event shall trash and _/_/_ debris remain for more than 24 hours 3 All operations and businesses shall be conducted to comply with the following standards which shall be incorporated into the lease agreements for all tenants a Noise Level -All commercial activities shall not create any noise that would exceed an _/_/_ exterior noise level of 55 dB during the hours of 10 p m until 7 a m and 60 d6 during the hours of l a m until 10 p m APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS NOTE ANY REVISIONS MAY VOID THESE REQUIREMENTS AND NECESSITATE ADDITIONAL REVIEW(S) E. General Requirements 1 Submit five complete sets of plans including the following _/_/_ a Site/Plot Plan, b Foundation Plan, c Floor Plan, d Ceiling and Roof Framing Plan, • e Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of the main switch, number and size 2 C&D24 Project No DRC2006-00985 Completion Date of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams, • f Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams, water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning, and g Planning Department Project Number DRC2006-00985 clearly identified on the outside of all plans 2 Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a soils report _/_/_ Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are required prior to plan check submittal 3 Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers' Compensation coverage to _/_/_ the City prior to permit issuance 4 Separate permits are required for fencing and/or walls _/_/_ 5 Business shall not open for operation prior to posting the Certificate of Occupancy issued by the _/_/_ Building and Safety Department F. Site Development 1 Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction All plans shall be _/_/_ marked with the project file number (DRC2006-00985) The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted California Codes, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application Contact the Building and Safety Department for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts 2 Prior to issuance of building permits for a new commercial or industrial development project or _/_/_ mayor addition, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate Such fees may • include but are not limited to City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Check Fees, Construction and Demolition Diversion Program deposit and fees and School Fees Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Building and Safety Department prior to permits issuance 3 Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m Monday _/_/_ through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays 4 Construct trash enclosure(s) per City Standard (available at the Planning Department's public _/_/_ counter) G. New Structures 1 Provide compliance with the California Building Code (CBC) for property line clearances _/_/_ considering use, area, and fire-resistiveness 2 Provide compliance with the California Building Code for required occupancy separations _/_/_ 3 Provide draft stops in attic areas, not to exceed 3,000 square feet, in accordance with CBC _/_/_ Section 1505 4 Exterior walls shall be constructed of the required fire rating in accordance with CBC Table 5-A _/_/_ 5 Openings in exterior walls shall be protected in accordance with CBC Table 5-A _/_/_ 6 Upon tenant improvement plan check submittal, additional requirements may be needed _/_/_ • 3 C&D25 Project No DRC2006-00985 Completion Date H. Grading 1 Grading of the subfect property shall be in accordance with California Building Code, City Grading _/_/~ Standards, and accepted grading practices The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved grading plan 2 A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to _/ /_ perform such work 3 A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the _/_/_ time of application for grading plan check 4 The final grading plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, _/_/_ submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of building permits 5 A separate grading plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for _/_/_ existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill The grading plan shall be prepared, stamped, and signed by a California registered Civil Engineer • • 4 C&D26 • RESOLUTION NO 07-29 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING VARIANCE NO DRC2007-00087, TO ALLOW A MAJOR W IRELESS COMMUNCIATION FACILITY WITHIN 300 FEET OF A RESIDENTIAL ZONE OR RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURE AND WITHIN 300 FEET OF AN EXISTING MAJOR WIRELESS COMMUNICATION FACILTIY LOCATED ON 1 02 ACRES OF LAND IN THE MEDIUM DENISTY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, LOCATED AT CITY FIRE STATION #171, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN 0202-101-11 A Recitals 1 Verizon Wireless filed an application for the issuance of Variance No DRC2007-00987 as described in the title of this Resolution Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Variance request is referred to as "the application " 2 On the 13th day of June 2007, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date 3 All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred B Resolution • NOW, THEREFORE, it is herebyfound, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows 1 This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on June 13, 2007, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows a The application applies to the property located on the north of 19th Street, south of SR210, and the east side of Amethyst Street, with a total street frontage of approximately 195 feet on Amethyst Street, which is presently improved with a City Fire Station, and b The property to the north of the subject site is zoned Medium Residential (8 - 14 dwelling units per acre) and is developed with multi-family dwelling units, the property to the south is zoned Office Professional and is developed with a Post Office, the property to the east is Medium Residential (8 -14 dwelling units per acre) and is developed with multi-family dwelling units, the property to the west is zoned Medium Residential (8 -14 dwelling units per acre) and is developed with multi-family dwelling units, and c The application proposes the installation of a 48-foot monopine, consisting of 12 antenna panels with artificial branches to resemble a pine tree and rubberized faux bark material made to imitate a tree trunk, thereby providing a stealth design that blends with the built environment • and meets the goals and obfectives of the Development Code, and d The Variance request is to allow a maJor wireless communication facility within 300 feet of a residential zone or residential structure and within 300 feet of an existing mayor wireless communication facility, and C&D27 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 07-29 DRC2007-00087 - VERIZON W IRELESS JUNE 13, 2007 Page 2 e The proposed wireless facility will be of sufficient height to allow for future co-location of an additional wireless faality, thereby meeting the goals and objectives of the Development Code by providing opportunities for co-location and the placement of multiple wireless carriers on a single-pole structure 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows a That strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the speafied regulations would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of the Development Code b That there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the property involved or to the intended use of the property that do not apply generally to the other properties in the same district c That strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties m the same district d That the granting of the Variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same district • e That the granting of the Variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity 4 The Planning Department Staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines The project qualifies under as a Class 1 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15301 (Existing Facilities) because the project involves no expansion of an existing use and there is no substantial evidence that the project may have a significant effect on the environment 5 Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below Planning Department 1) Variance approval shall expire if building permits are not issued within five years from the date of approval No extensions are allowed 2) All conditions in Resolution 07-28 (DRC2006-00985) shall be met 6 The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 13TH DAY OF JUNE 2007 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA • C&D28 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 07-29 DRC2007-00087 - VERIZON WIRELESS JUNE 13, 2007 Page 3 BY Pam Stewart, Chairman ATTEST James R Troyer, AICP, Secretary I, James R Troyer, AICP, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 13th day of June 2007, by the following vote-to-wit AYES COMMISSIONERS NOES COMMISSIONERS ABSENT COMMISSIONERS • • C&D29 ~y~~t ~ Nzl i TH E C I T Y O F ~.`.{..' n ,n'~' ~siT'"'-~'.a..~'r`--.~.a,'~~.f`„'s~r,~7~ ~.s:.us~'~,'~~,' ~n n~.,<`"~'`, i,,'~s""'mat ;~~~:,~~..~.,,r~4x..ra,.,T-r-~~-..m-_'`Tv ~'_:e4.v:G..,,'az ~~~~~.i RANCHO CUCAMONGA Siff Report DATE June 13, 2007 TO Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM James R Troyer, Planning Director BY Tabe van der Zwaag, Assistant Planner SUBJECT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2007-00076 - WILKUS ARCHITECTS - A request to develop a 6,852 square foot full service restaurant with bar on an existing 70,000 square foot lot that rs a part of a previously approved 7 01 acre master planned development in the • Industnal Park Drstnct (Subarea 12), located at 11336 4th Street at the northeast comer of Mdiiken Avenue and 4th Street -Related Fdes Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16282 and Conditional Use Permit DRC2003-00728 BACKGROUND The site is a part of the previously approved master plan, Conditional Use Permit DRC2003-00728, which included the Marriott Town Place Suites, three mixed restaurant/retail buildings totaling 24,729 square feet, and the subject vacant budding pad ANALYSIS A Srte Description and Surroundinca Land Use Tahoe Joe's restaurant will be located on the north side of 4th Street, dust east of Mdirken Avenue, and rs part of the Town Place Square Master Plan The subject site (Lot 2 of Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16282) is approximately 70,000 square feet (1 6 acre) in size and contains 105 parking spaces whose use is shared wrth the entire development B Desi n The design of the single-story building rs a modem interpretation of the "mountain lodge" architectural style Characteristics of "mountain lodge" architecture are steep roofs, exposed logs, vertical wood plank siding, and the use of native stone The proposed design incorporates many of the abovementioned design elements including the use of "river" rock as an exterior wall material, wood siding, and a steep slate the roof C Use Description The applicant proposes to serve a full Irne of alcoholic beverages (beer, • wine, and distilled spirits) rn conjunction wrth the operation of a #ull service restaurant Tahoe Joe's is a steak house with a mountain lodge theme The 6,852 square foot restaurant includes an approximately 675 square foot bar area and 823 square foot ITEM E PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2007-00076 - WILKUS ARCHITECTS June 13, 2007 Page 2 outdoor eating area The restaurant will be open Monday through Thursday from 4 00 p m to 10 00 p m , Fnday from 4 00 p m to 11 00 p m ,Saturday from 3 00 p m to 11 00 p m and Sunday from 11 00 a m to 9 00 p m PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION A Surrounding Land Use and Zoning North - Industnal buildings/Industnal Park (Subarea 12) South - 4th Street/City of Ontano (Ontano Mills Shopping Center) East - Vacant land/Industnal Park (Subarea 12) West - Vacant land/Industnal Park (Subarea 12) B General Plan Designations Project Srte -Industrial Park North - Industnal Park South - 4th Street/City of Ontario East - Industnal Park West - Industnal Park C Site Charactenstics The site is vacant and contains no trees The frontages of the site are improved with curb and gutter Parkin The proposed use requires a total 85 parking spaces The applicant's proposal • for outdoor dining will require the elimination of 9 parking spaces, which will leave the entire master-planned site with 354 parking spaces The entire site is required to have a total of 379 parking spaces The applicant has submitted a Parking Study dated January 9, 2007 (Katz, Okitsu 8~ Associates), which concludes that the site provides an adequate amount of on-site parking to meet the expected parking demands of the vanous uses planned for the site The study provides data showing that the various uses (retail, hotel, and restaurant) will have different peak parking demand times and that at least 10-percent of the customers of the restaurant will walk over from the hotel Tahoe Joe's will be open for droner 7 days per week, and for lunch on Sundays, further limiting the overall parking demand on the center, which has many retail businesses and quick serve restaurants whose peak business hours are between noon and 3 00 p m Staff believes that the Parking Study adequately takes into consideration the overall parking demands of the entire site and that there will be sufficient parking for all the uses D Design Review Committee The Design Review Committee (Munoz, Stewart, Draz) reviewed the project on May 1, 2007, and recommended approval with minor changes The Committee accepted the applicant's request to use real river rock on the building instead of the cultured stone that was used for the rest of the development Additionally, the Committee requested that the wrought iron fencing used to enclose the outdoor eating area be redesigned to be more in keeping with the mountain lodge theme of the restaurant and that the exposed neon roof lighting be removed The applicant agreed to all changes E Technical and Grading Review Committee The project was reviewed by the Committees on May 1, 2007, and was approved by both Committees The project was approved • without any new conditions E-2 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2007-00076 - WILKUS ARCHITECTS June 13, 2007 Page 3 F Environmental Assessment Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City adopted a Mitigated Negative Declaration on January 28, 2004, in connection with the City's approval of Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16282 and Conditional Use Permit DRC2003-00728 for the development of the center Staff has evaluated the current application, Conditional Use Permit DRC2007-00076, and finds it to be consistent with the project or approved Conditional Use Permit and creates no new or more severe environmental impacts than those evaluated in the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration The original approval took into consideration that the subject site would be developed with a 7,300 square foot restaurant As such, this application is well within the scope of the original approval Therefore, pursuant to CEQA, staff recommends that the Planning Commission concur with staffs determination that no additional environmental review is required in connection with the City's consideration of Conditional Use Permit DRC2007-00076 CORRESPONDENCE This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Dady Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 660-foot radius of the project site No correspondence has been received RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Conditional Use Permit DRC2007-00076 through adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval Respectfully submitted, • i~- Ja es R Troyer, ACIP Planning Director JT TV1ma Attachments Exhibit A - Site Plan Exhibit B - Landscape Plan Exhibit C - Building Elevations Exhibit D - Floor Plan Exhibit E - Design Review Committee Action Agenda dated May 1, 2007 Draft Resolution of Approval for Conditional Use Permit DRC2007-00076 • E-3 a ~ szsr-oct (r~U ¢vgeea-irt (nq ~~ _ __ __ _ __ _1 ~ am(xxl me amc ucs(css) u~ uaos n 'un.e un .w u¢ m~.roe r+o . w I- _- p vo t1u5n1 u 6 1 s a 4 a g o )6515 I u u oa, .y yf b o a ) i y o, y 3nHy, gd' ooi aims anrrenv iodvar+ zzsri ' 1 ~ w ~ I 5311213d0?Jd 3JVld13NfJVW S ~- ~ a } I ~ ~ -) ~ y~na+z~iMO~~ad ~~~g 44441444, ~a 8, ` ~d. 65' I I- 86$41 !i E - i-~-Ftl~ ----5-~ ~ I -¢-----r ~ ~- ----- 6 - -Cgi w 4 16 ~I ~ ; ~ gtll d p s~i~i~ ~~ @ 11 ~el ~ ~ ~ ° ~~ I Y~ ~ ~ [~ ~ E i ~'9 I~g ~ I p I~ °~ ~I~ ~ g~~F~ IP @~ ~ ~1~ i~~ `~ e I I@ ~ ~ ~g I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I~ e5 ~~ I~i ~ ! § ~~+p+pp~gx ~ f @ g g ~& Q38 a l ~ p, e,$ I a~ e8 ~ ~ g e @ ~ ~ 1 3 ~ i ~ 'Z ~ 9 I ~ 8 @ X83 g4i ~ I ~g ~@' ~ I ~ f A ~° I@ 8 ~ 2 ~8 ~ I @ 0 R ~ ~ I ~ ~~ e ~ $ ~ ~ ~ ( ~ ~ E I ~ ~~I g~ E6~ 8 , ~ 3~ ~ ~ 3 gpe' ~ ~~ ~ ~s ~~~ ~ ~ Ise Isq P~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ; y~ 9° ~~ g ~~ ~ ; a ~ ,~~ ~3~,~ ~ ~ ~~'p~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ pa ; ~ ~ g l } p i 5 ~B ~ i~~ Eg ~ ~Ei I~ i @ y i g ~~ ~~ ~; dP @ a j f d I @ , 14 A ' B~ 6 I w E s ~ d Its ~ ~~ 2 ~ ~ ~ ' ~ ~ ~~ ~ ' ~~ gp @{ ~ ~ 6 s ~ I ~ ~~gg ~'~. ~@i 8 ~€ ~ @~~ ~ 13'~~ ? ~~I°. g ~ 9 ~ ~~ @`I ~ ~R ~ ~ ~~~ i i~~ ~ ~~ € @ ~ 8 Pe ~ ~ 16 ~ ~ j I ~ ~ I Y ~~ 93 e'~y36 6 ~~ ~ eAl9~~l~' ~ ~ I~~3$ 1~~9~~~~. i ~ ~~~pp @,~~;;,~a~a3'~ ~~ag~e $8~8 ~ `~~~~ y ~'; ,@~ ~ W ~~>;;3~ ~ i~d6r38 d 3 ~ ~ ~tl ~ ~ 139 3 ~~I$~~ ~ r ~_ ~_~ 38Ld~~~ ~~__~ 3[ FH : ~ g f : ~~~~E~ €~e~~! r 148 €~af6 f~ € ~~g~,@~1€ ~ I_ 3 _~ ~ !a t ~ 6 ~ G ~; r W I yam- -~~;;~~ - i I--I-I _ I I I 6 ~~i ~~i ;~~- I ---- 1 1 i - I~~ i /"~ ~ I ~ ~ tV~lit~ ~ r 0 3 i I I ~~ ~Ui\11_ _~ a 3° ~ i~ ~l'1 ~~ I 11 and H~anasuld ~ ; ~:' ~~~, ~ ~ ~ ~ ~Q _ ~ O ~I~e ~ ~! t '~ - -_-_ -- - -- -- - -- - --~-- _ -- - -- - -- r -- -- u ----- ------H-- --------------~ `~ I~~~ I9gQ' i ~~ ~ ~ ~ I ~~ I - I I B ~ ~~t ~i ~ ¢g~ i~8~~$ ~ gg~ • ~ a' ~ ~ I i i ~@id i ~ ~k I I F~ f i E ~~ I E~ b .o.ssne• .~..._.ti• -~~ o i-. ~- \b~ N3~IIllIW ~ E-4 0 ~ ~ ~,~~m ®~I® { I I ~ ~ ~~ C I 4 ~ 13 5I 5 ~ ~~ ~ ldfdt (~ ~ , P 1 , I Z _ ~ ~ I IQ ~ I -- d,~ W I .nr rm , f J J1'I~ 1 i tt ~1 G 2 e ~ e~ I i= ~ ~ O I i ~ ~~ ~ m ZI 66pp p ~ ~+! ~ ~ ~ @ 2 . e ~ .N.. 5 t ~ 99Qiy9 a€~P ba@ aq° 6 I ~ is 2e J e @8~~~6T Y a~ SY ~@@ F@~~~~y~~ ~a~ c ~ I~ a1 ~~~~3~~lE@~[~dd ~~ ±i I I 'o NI I i W ~ I ~ ~ ' . i ~ ~ I ~ Q J I I ~ ~ Z W 1 [. • • ~~= I I b'IN2iO~Ilb'J rb'JNOW`d~fl~ OH~N`d2i p~° SE~OC ~OHdl end H~~nasllid 'r I' I ~ '" ft Q o E~r 1011111 ~ OtlIIN (I 111111 4 ~ NII31 N4 ~ I / ~ I rv~a ~ ~ ~- I J I Z - _ - U 1 r ~ ~ ~~ d n ~ ~ ~ 3~ m ~~~ ~ ~ ~ g ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~g c ~ s ~ ~ ~ s ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~~ g ~ ~ 3 0 8 oe o ~§~~ ~~ ~~ O ~~~~~~~ ~~~ ~ ~~ o~~z ~ ~ ~ ~ b ~ ~~ ~ ^~~ V ~k ~ ~~ u ~ moa d ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ 3 5 z ~ 3 ~ ~I~ ~ ~ ~ Q d ~ pi 5~ ~ z i c ~ ~ SS _'T""I~I ~vj ~~~ W J Z Q J `~ 1~~~Y ~ ~ ~~`~~ ~, ~` ~~ ,:~ ~,\. \, ~ \ ~~~ ~ \ 4~~ ~, \\ \ ~ `\ ~\ ~\ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ .~~r ~'~~ s ~ . ~'"~ I~3a _ It ~~I~ J t a FF e ag~ EQ~~~Ba ~~~~ 493 'a 4 t ~1~~$~g ~~3~ E~~ ~ o~g,p ~~~ $~ 9 ~a~ N ~Z34$8~~ p g $~E~1$ o ~~~~$~~~ ~ ~~~i~~;s a~e~&~~, Z.a~~~~~~ a 5 . . l/') W H O Q U Z ~~m .~o e~m ~~r w~° m° W s aP'~ ~~ ~_ U n ~ ~~ V 1\~ 2 Q ~ z~ U p~ ~ ~~ ~n ~ >; p `~J~ ~7 ~~ ~R ~~~ e _' , LG, r ~~z ~ `. ~ z ~ f ~~ ~ Z - _ Q ~~~ o >s ~ ~ ~ ~_ ~ ~ s - ~ ~w - _ Q ~ o~ u ~ ;o ~ ~aE ~z ~ ~ ~~ ~ ,° v ~c~ x ~ w ~c ~_ ~m 61. Z ~~ ~ ~ o rc '~ Z~ I J _ ~ N LL1 "' ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ +. ~ ~ -^ I ~ \~ ~ \ \ ~ \ ~ 'a \ _ \~ ~ ~ ~ Q ~~ ~ . ~- `1 ~ ~ A II// I f ~` 4 ~ti ~ ~ \ 4 - ~ ~ ~~~ F~I1~I2I03I'Id~ `F~91sOL1IF~0110 OH~I~Id2I '.I ' ji ~ ~ I^ ~ ~~ • .~% U o wm mo = m w ,u a a~ am LLB m Im 1 a o n3 ~a ~o n ~ a.o m Z~ Zmr a a FacHi pir C • E-6 ~m ~~~ ~II~I2I03I'Id~ E~9I~IOL~t~'Ofl~ OH~I~Id2i s ~or ~oH~i I i ~ ~- ~ ¢ ~ ~<< ~~ ~ ~ ~ !~I ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~3 ~ 6 ~- Q; Z~~~d < N Qt ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~i ~ ~ ~p3~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~~~ ~ y ) ~~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~~ o< w~~a~~ ~~ ~~~ ~ - ~~ a ~7 r _ ~, - m ,~. O O • l ~~h _ i O ~, - - ® O - - _ ® - _r r r- i r - ~ W U ~ Zen a ~~ ~N c ~ g ~~ `> op~~ U N ~~ ~ °~ o ~ ~ Z ~ p W4 w0 ~ ~ ~Q ~~ ~a ~ ~ ~~oo ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~j ~~ ~~° ~a ~ o o~ ®z ~ m ~~ ~< ~~ ns ~< :o • n o~~~ 4 La Q ~ an o ~n N ...... .ter. E-7 <~~ ~ \ III ~~~ IT ~ ~-r~-~_ 1- S ~,~ ~~~ dII~I2I03I'Id~ d`JI~IOY1id~[l~ OH~1~Id2I i ; ~ i, ~ ~~ ~, s~~l~ I~~ I I ~ ~~ _°° f ~' r I ?-----------~ ----h-~ I I -- -- - -I - -- - ~- - -~--__~ ---~__----- -O ~ J----- \.. -~ i I ~~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ I -- I I ~~L-----_------_-_----------- _ ~ ~ ~ ~ I ( I Q-- I- - - - - ' a°5yt ~ r J ~ - y I ~~ ~ ~ - - . - I -~ _~ _.._.. ~ ~ I , I - -- - I ~ ~~ ` __ ~t _ ( L_ t? °e'' I I '~ III ~~ r ~~~~------------ -~----------- ~'3 , r_________ _ i t '~i -- '------~---- M, _f 1' I ~~ , *w, O- c~L=-F,;,.~----------E`er--=-= - •'~ I I i ' Q--i - I - - I~- - c cLL-=~ --- ----------- --_ ~ I ~~ f i t z ------ ~ __, , o ~ 1 I~_- CII--^------- l_J - - - - ~ ~ --`- '` ---r~---------- ~ II T- ---L~----------- ~~---r~----------- C~~------------ I Q -- -- -- I I I I - c~ i _ J;e 1 ~ ,s J J. ~ y v ~'~ ! l ' L ~S_n_ 13 !r i ~_~ r ~ , i ~ - ' i I ~' y k...i o- I ~~t , W ~ I -~ Lek 5 ] Irl ~ ~ P ~ i -- -- -~ /~ f ___- ~ i _ I -- I ~ I m - - -r -Q o r . -O 0 ~, t ~ I~ i ~ ~ ~- ~ 1 a -- ~.~t~~-- ~ T ~I ~ ~ ~ / \ / \ EXHIBIT D ~ f I I E-8 • CONSENT DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 7 00 p m Tabe van der Zwaag May 1, 2007 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - DRC2007-00076 WILKUS ARCHITECTS - A request to develop a 6,852 square foot new full service restaurant (including bar) of the previously approved master planned existing Marriott's Town Place Suites on 7 01 acres of land in the Industrial Park District (Subarea 12), located at the northeast corner Milliken Avenue and 4th Street, 11336 4th Street Related Files SUBTPM16282 and DRC2003-00728 Design Parameters The project is a part of the previously approved master planned development on a 7 01-acre site, located at the northeast corner of Milliken Avenue and 4th Street The site is improved with a couple retail buildings and the multiple-story Marriott Town Place Suites The site is surrounded by industrial/office/approved hotel(s) (Holiday Inn Express and Hilton Suites) uses to the north and east To the west is Milliken Avenue and 4th Street and is developed with mature trees The project is an infiil project within the Bixby Business Park Master Plan The hotel and retail building were richly designed with amodern/traditional theme with an • Adoquin Stone base and vertical element enhancements along with tower elements, substantial pop outs, key stone details over windows, smooth trowel finish on the facade, and a four color paint scheme to add contrast to the buildings Staff Comments The only issue that staff has and believes can be resolved as a Consent Item is that the proposed project is to reflect the approved architectural materials, color, and design The applicant agreed to this in the original design The comments in the Design Review report of DRC2003-00728 stated that "the other three restaurant buildings will have to be designed to reflect the proposed architectural scheme of the project " Staff Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the proposed project subject to the revision of architecturally matching the existing commercial center colors and materials Design Review Committee Action Members Present Munoz, Stewart, Diaz Staff Planner Tabe van der Zwaag The Committee approved the project as presented The Committee approved the applicants request to use natural river rock on the exterior of the building in place of the stone used in the remainder of the center The Committee also requested that the exterior neon light be deleted and that a new design for fences/railing around the building be changed to a style that was more in keeping with the lodge style architecture of the restaurant building • EXHIBIT E E-9 • RESOLUTION NO 07-30 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2007-00076, A REQUEST TO DEVELOP A 6,852 SQUARE FOOT FULL SERVICE RESTAURANT WITH BAR ON AN EXISTING 70,000 SQUARE FOOT LOT IN THE PREVIOUSLY APPROVED 7 01 ACRE MASTER PLANNED DEVELOPMENT IN THE INDUSTRIAL PARK DISTRICT (SUBAREA 12), LOCATED AT 11336 4TH STREET AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER MILLIKEN AVENUE AND 4TH STREET, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF A Recitals 1 Wilkus Architects filed an application on behalf of Tahoe Joe's Famous Steakhouse restaurant for the issuance of Conditional Use Permit DRC2007-00076, as described in the title of this Resolution Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Conditional Use Permit request is referred to as "the application " 2 On the 13th day of June 2007, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing to consider the application and concluded said hearing on that date • 3 All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred B Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows 1 This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on June 13, 2007, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows a The application applies to a 70,000 square foot lot that is a part of a previously approved 7 01 acre master planned development (Conditional Use Permit DRC2003-00728}, located at the northeast comer Milliken Avenue and 4th Street, and b The surrounding area is developed with a mix of hotels, restaurants, and general commercial uses, and c The proposed use includes the operation of a full service restaurant with a bar selling alcoholic dunks (i a ,beer, wine, and distilled spirits) for consumption on the premises with meals served by the restaurant, and • d The site has been determined to have adequate parking for the proposed use E10 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 07-30 DRC2007-00076 - WILKUS ARCHITECTS June 13, 2007 Page 2 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing, and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows a The proposed use ~s in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located, and b The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially in~unous to properties or improvements in the vicirnty, and c The application, which contemplates operation of the proposed use, complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code 4 Based upon the facts and information contained in the application, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that no subsequent or supplemental environmental document is required pursuant to the Califorrna Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in connection with the review and approval of this application based upon the following findings and determinations • a Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City adopted a Mitigated Negative Declaration on January 28, 2004, in connection with the City's approval of Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16282 and Conditional Use Permit DRC2003-00728 for the development of the commercial center at the subject location • Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, no subsequent or supplemental EIR or Negative Declaration is required in connection with subsequent discretionary approvals of the same project unless (i) substantial changes are proposed to the project that indicate new or more severe impacts on the environment, (u) substantial changes have occurred in the circumstances under which the project was previously reviewed that indicates new or more severe environmental impacts, or (ui) new important information shows the project will have new or more severe impacts than previously considered, or (iv) additional mitigation measures are now feasible to reduce impacts or different mitigation measures can be imposed to substantially reduce impacts b The Planning Commission finds, in connection with Conditional Use Permit DRC2007-00076, that no substantial changes have been made that would effect the conclusions made in the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration The original approval took into consideration that the subject site would be developed with a 7,300 square foot restaurant This application proposes a 6,852 square foot restaurant and 823 square foot outdoor eating area, well within the scope of the original approval Therefore, pursuant to CEQA, staff recommends that the Planning Commission concur with staff s determination that no additional environmental review is required in connection with the City's consideration of Conditional Use Permit DRC2007-00076 c Based on these findings and all evidence in the record, the Planning Commission concurs with the staff determination that no additional environmental review is required pursuant to CEQA in connection with the City's consideration of the Conditional Use Permit DRC2007-00076 :7 E11 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 07-30 DRC2007-00076 - WILKUS ARCHITECTS June 13, 2007 • Page 3 5 Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, the Planning Commission hereby approves the application, subJect to each and every condition set forth below in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference Planning Department 1) This approval is for the development of a single-story, 6,876 square foot dine-in restaurant, bar, and 823 square foot outdoor patio dining area on Lot 2 of Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16282 within the Town Place Square 2) Approval is also hereby granted for the sale and service of alcoholic beverages (beer, wine, and d~stdled spints) for on-site consumption in conjunction with the operation of afull-service restaurant offering a menu with an assortment of food items commonly ordered during various hours of the day The sale and/or service of alcoholic beverages shall cease when full menu food items are not available to customers 3) The serving of alcoholic beverages shall be limited to the approved hours for operation of the restaurant, which are Monday through Thursday from 4 00 p m to 10 00 p m , Friday from 4 00 p m to • 11 00 p m ,Saturday from 3 00 p m to 11 00 p m ,and Sunday from 1100am to900pm 4) Changes to the operating hours of the restaurant shall be submitted for review and approval by the Planning Director 5) Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with any sections of the Urnform Building Code, City Ordinances, San Bernardino County Health Department, and/or California State Department of Alcoholic Beverages Control (ABC) 6) The applicant shall be responsible for obtaining a Liquor License appropriate for the on-site sale/service of beer and wine in a restaurant as issued by the California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC) for this location 7) This permit does not allow entertainment Entertainment activities as defined by Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Chapter 5 12, shall require the applicant to obtain a separate Entertainment Permit approval from the Planning Commission 8) The facility shall operate in conformance with all applicable performance standards as defined in the Development Code including, but not limited to, noise levels If operation of the facility causes adverse effects upon adjacent businesses or operations, the • Conditional Use Permit shall be brought before the Planning Director for consideration and possible termination of the use E12 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 07-30 DRC2007-00076 - WILKUS ARCHITECTS June 13, 2007 Page 4 9) All architectural and srte plan details submitted for plan check shall be consistent with the plans approved by the Design Review Committee (DRC) on May 1, 2007, and on-file with the Planning Department 10) Any signs proposed for the restaurant shall be designed in conformance with the City's Sign Ordinance and the Uniform Sign Program for the Town Place Square Wntten landlord and Planning Director approval shall be obtained pnor to installation of any signs 11) Pay all applicable fees 12) All roof-mounted equipment shall be screened from direct view from the street by the parapet wall of the building 6 The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 13TH DAY OF JUNE 2007 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CfTY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY ATTEST Pam Stewart, Chairman James R Troyer, AICP, Secretary I, James R Troyer, AICP, Secretary of the Planrnng Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 13th day of June 2007, by the following vote-to-wit AYES COMMISSIONERS NOES COMMISSIONERS ABSENT COMMISSIONERS • • E13 <~ - ~~' - ~. -- .~- }, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2007-00076 SUBJECT CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICANT WILKUS ARCHITECTS for TAHOE JOES LOCATION• 11336 4TH STREET ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS• ~. General Requirements The appllcant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the Issuance of such approval, or In the alternative, to relinquish such approval The appllcant shall reimburse the City, Its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees maybe required by a court to pay as a result of such action The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense In the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No 07-30, Standard Conditions, and aii environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size) The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect The applicant shall be required to pay any applicable Fish and Game fees as shown below The project planner will confirm which fees apply to this project All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to the Planning Commission or Planning Director hearing a) Notice of Exemption - $50 B. Time Limits Conditional Use Permit approval shall expire if building permits are not Issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval No extensions are allowed I \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2007 Res & Stf Rpt\DRC2007-00076StdCond 6-13 doc Completion Date -/-/- -/_~ -/-/. _/_/ E14 Protect No DRC2007-00076 Completion Date C. Site Development 1 The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include _/_/~ site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file In the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, and Development Code regulations 2 Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions _/_/_ of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director 3 Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Building Code and _/_/_ State Flre Marshal regulations have been compiled with Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Department to show compliance The buildings shall be Inspected for compliance prior to occupancy 4 Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be _/_/_ submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits 5 All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street Improvement plans shall be coordinated for _/_/_ consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, buliding, etc) or prior to final map approval In the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first 6 Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all _/_/_ other applicable Clty Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the time of building permit Issuance 7 If no centralized trash receptacles are provided, all trash pick-up shall be for Individual units with _/_/_ all receptacles shielded from public view 8 Trash receptacle(s) are required and shall meet Clty standards The final design, locations, and _/_/ the number of trash receptacles shall be subject to Planning Director review and approval prior to ~ the Issuance of buliding permits 9 All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc ,shall be _/_/_ located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the Planning Director For single-family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults 10 All building numbers and Individual units shall be Identified In a clear and concise manner, _/_/_ Including proper Illumination 11 All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property _/_/_ owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for Planning Director and City Engineer review and approved prior to the Issuance of building permits D. Shopping Centers 1 Graffiti shall be removed within 72 hours / / 2 The entire site shall be kept free from trash and debris at all times and in no event shall trash and _/_/_ debris remain for more than 24 hours 3 All operations and businesses shall be conducted to comply with the following standards which shall be Incorporated into the lease agreements for all tenants a Noise Level -All commercial activities shall not create any noise that would exceed an / / exterior noise level of 60 dB during the hours of 10 p m until 7 a m and 65 dB during the _ _ hours of l a m until 10 p m • I \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2007 Res & Stf Rpt\DRC2007-00076StdCond 6 13 doc E15 Protect No DRC2007-00076 b Loading and Unloading - No person shall cause the loading, unloading, opening, closing, or other handling of boxes, crates, containers, building materials, garbage cans, or other • similar objects between the hours of 10 p m and 7 a m unless otherwise specified herein, in a manner which would cause a noise disturbance to a residential area Textured pavement shall be provided across circulation aisle, pedestrian walkway, and plaza They shall be of brick/tile pavers, exposed aggregate, integral color concrete, or any combination thereof Full samples shall be submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits The lighting fixture design shall compliment the architectural program It shall include the plaza area lighting fixtures, building lighting fixtures (exterior), and parking lot lighting fixtures E. Building Design All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted equipment and/or projections, shall be shielded from view and the sound buffered from adjacent properties and streets as required by the Planning Department Such screening shall be architecturally integrated with the building design and constructed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director Details shall be included in building plans F. Parking and Vehicular Access (indicate details on building plans) 1 All parking spaces shall be 9 feet wide by 18 feet long W hen a side of any parking space abuts a building, wall, support column, or other obstruction, the space shall be a minimum of 11 feet wide 2 All parking lot landscape islands shall have a minimum outside dimension of 6 feet and shall contain a 12-inch walk adjacent to the parking stall (Including curb) 3 Textured pedestrian pathways and textured pavement across circulation aisles shall be provided • throughout the development to connect dwellings/units/buildings with open spaces/plazas/ recreational uses 4 All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles, entrances, and exits shall be striped per City standards G. Landscaping 1 A minimum of 20% of trees planted within industrial projects, and a minimum of 30% within commercial and office projects, shall be specimen size trees - 24-Inch box or larger 2 Within parking lots, trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15-gallon tree for every three parking stalls 3 Trees shall be planted in areas of public view adfacent to and along structures at a rate of one tree per 30 linear feet of building 4 Landscaping and Irrigation systems required to be Installed within the public right-of-way on the perimeter of this project area shall be continuously maintained by the developer H. Stgns 1 The signs Indicated on the submitted plans are conceptual only and not a part of this approval Any signs proposed for this development shall comply with the Sign Ordinance and shall require separate application and approval by the Planning Department prior to Installation of any signs APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DEPARTMENT, FIRE PROTECTION PLANNING SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH ALL FIRE CONDITIONS • 3 I \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2007 Res & Stf Rpt\DRC2007 00076StdCond 6-13 doc Completion Date -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/_/ -/-/- / / -/-/ -/-/. -/-/. -/_/ -/_/ -/-/- -/-/. E16 / ~-~ \ C l ~ ~ ,~l 1-;t~" ,. ~~ T H E C I T Y O F R n N C H O C U C A M O N G A Stiff Report DATE June 13, 2007 TO Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM James R Troyer, AICP, Planning Director BY Tabe van der Zwaag, Assistant Planner SUBJECT TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM17808 - WILLIAM ESPINOZA - A request to subdivide a 75 acre parcel into two lots in the Low Residential district (2-4 dwelling units per acre) located at northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Palo Alto Street - APN 1077-022-74 • PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION A Project Density 2 7 dwelling units per acre B Surrounding Land Use and Zoning North -Single-Family Residential, Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) South - Single-Family Residential, Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) East -Single-Family Residential, Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) West -Single-Family Residential, Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) C General Plan Designations Project Site -Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) North -Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) South - Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) East -Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) West -Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) D Site Characteristics The subject property is surrounded by single-family residential development to the north, south, east and west The site is presently developed with one single-family residence accessible by Archibald Avenue and will be preserved in place The site generally slopes from north to south ANALYSIS A Background The applicant presently has asingle-family residence and business located on a . parcel of land situated on the north side of Foothill Boulevard and east of Center Avenue The site has been purchased by the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency for the purpose of developing affordable housing The applicant has purchased the parcel being subdivided with this application for the purpose of moving his existing residence to Lot 2 of the two-lot subdivision ITEM F PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTPM17808 -WILLIAM ESPINOZA June 13, 2007 Page 2 B General The applicant proposes subdividing 75 acre of land into two lots Lot 1 will include the existing single-family residence, and Lot 2 will have asingle-family residence moved onto it from a site on Foothill Boulevard The proposed lots meet all City requirements including width, depth, and size The average lot size is 16,293 square feet, which exceeds the 8,000 square foot average required in the Low Residential District The proposed lot sizes are as follows Lot 1 10,346 square feet Lot 2 22,239 square feet Average Lot Size 16,293 square feet C Design Review Committee On May 15, 2007, the Design Review Committee (Munoz, Stewart, Diaz) reviewed the project and recommended approval as presented D Technical Review and Grading Committees The Technical and Grading Committees reviewed the project and recommended approval subject to the conditions outlined in the attached Resolution of Approval with conditions E Environmental Assessment The Planning Department staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines The project qualifies as a Class 15 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15315, which covers the division of residentially zoned property in urbanized • areas into four or fewer parcels when the division is in conformance with the General Plan, zoning regulations and no variances are required Because the applicant proposes atwo-lot subdivision that meets all City requirements, staff finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project may have a significant effect on the environment CORRESPONDENCE This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Vailey Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 660-foot radius of the project site RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Tentative Parcel Map SUBTT17808, through adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval with conditions Respectfully submitted, ~~ Jam R Troyer, AICP Planning Director JT TV~ma Attachments Exhibit A - Location Map Exhibit B - Aerial Photograph Exhibit C - Tentative Parcel Map • Exhibit D - Photos of House and Garage to be Moved to Lot 2 Exhibit E - Design Review Committee Action Agenda dated May 15, 2007 Draft Resolution of Approval for Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM17808 F-2 • • • " Lea r~1t~v~~;~""~ r _"- I ,~ ~~~~ ~~ r -~ ~ `~ ~~ ~ ~ frr tr.~~.,.L'_ ~Cv ~~' ~-b, _ _~ } _ st~° .~, ii I ~ ~ .~ ~ ~...T.__ ~ ,~~ ~ ~ V ~ ift{ ~~ ~ (1 ~ 1 1( ~'~ t ' La 4 °i ~_' ,~ •,~ ` ~ ~~~ ~~ ~~ n~ __ ~ ro. ~~~' ~r ~!~ 1 ~(G,,,~- k e f - ~~ ik 1' ~,t'~S~it- i ,~ 11 ~., i ~ ~ '~`_~ ~ _ ~ ~..~.,~ i ~__ _~ ,~.+ r~ t~ EXHIBIT A ,. ,,~_ - t~ a ~~ ~ f ti ~~ ~trtr~ 5Y X ' ~ ~i'" "' ~; ~,+~~ F-3 F-4 • • • e~ i~ ~ ~ ~n I g" -, _ ~~ a a~~ s ~ °m~ iA ~o ~, 6 a ~, 3 S c ~ °uy' ° s,rP' ~~ ~ 3 ~ a ~ i S, lid pA \ O ~ ~y o i ~ ~z Y S ~ p n ~ § ZS K ~ M ~ - ^~ EM ' I ~~ ~~ I ,~ - _ I ARCH/BALD AVENUE ~ ti - --- --- ' -- - --- --- - -- --r----- -- - a ~~ ~ ~~ " A e zz i I a 2 I ~ ~~ s ~ a~ $ ~ a~ s N~ m ursr uc I _T,° tiC Q \ oo ~ I i n ~ ~ .. 1 v, b~ o IT u w/ s ,~~1 ~ I I I ~~~ ~ or n = z _~ I e ?~ i x ~ I I ~~ I ~ ~ :,s § i r ~ ~ /' ~ poi BREEZEWAY ~ m w~ ~ n I g r .gym as.aw wm „a ~ „ ~ op ~ h ~ ~ II s I ya ~,8 I Pa ,~ S T~ ~~ A o I I~ m i7 I~ ~ I ~~ I I i ~ n cn m Oa ~ }~ ~ g I "~ a I/~ s ~ o m ~~ o zN I I2 ~ ~ti 4 I a I I. ~ I °~ y A°^oO ~ I ~ i ~ ~i~$ ~ "a 22 ~ s I ~ o ~a ~n I I ^ ~ ~ I o,S tPao.+~ ~ I ~ ~ 22 ~ v y' ~ 4 ~,~ I I ~2 e it 1 1 e D , `"~ ~ ~'R, ~ (S ~ a0 r '-'u a s= ~ I o2 ~ O N * ~ tl1os ~~ n ~ y~ _ ~ I ~ o ~ ~~ N 1~ S tl~+ "` EX/SnNG RES/OENCf ~ T ~ I I ~ i+ O tl I ~ ` O I V M,~1 \ \ a~e v ~ e ro ~ ~ ~ ~ \ 1 ~3 ! t ~ ® I , ex ~ ~ u , ~_ ~ e '. o~ I, ~ i~ ~~ ExlstlNC afsroENCE = n ~ Uy i N - I f ~Dr`. GRAUINC CJMI UTT2 CONCPPfII\ hGVIFJ/ ~APPROVFp W/C7ND1Ti0Y~ ~z D I I _ ^APPYpp,Y,PD on ~~ ~;pF,~~sgaa£ ~ I m ~£~~~~~ ~~ ~ ~&A ~ ~~~ ~ ~ `~$~ ~ ~~a€ ~ y~~~€I~ pArE/~~lv~~s°7 m~ AZ v~'~ pgY3~ ~ I o ~ °~ N '`~ a ~~~~ a ~~ 2a ~g "~a ode ~ a e ~ a a o ~ $ g~~ ~ ~~ ~ >I ~ >"~~ £a £~ - c ~C--~' 2 ~ ~ ~t~~a x ~ s 4 £~ce E X H I B I T C ~k F-5 ;r • ~, i a fir _r ,t.Y k .,, ° 1 a I i k, k'fl ~ ~ ~x ~ `~ ~ 4~ ~ c " h ~~ -- t ~ # ~ ,7y _ { ~ ` ~ ~~ r. Y 1 ~ G r b N1"' 9Y"J ~f2~ E( ~ ~. ~T ({ p t 4 + ~ C~~ ~~~° ~' '`Si i ~; o- :. i ~ "~ ' n ~~ ~ "9 ~ ~~ n, x ,, "' .y ~~ i. ~~ ~ . ~~~4 i a ,~ ' ~ y ~~.~~, i,~t s ' ~ ~ j ~ 7 ~ c t j t ~ • Y i ~T ~~ _ C~ 1 ~ J f ~ 4 0 ~ 9 F ~ ~ ~y ~ ~ _ t k.~...,.-- 3 ir, ~ ~ •~, ~i r - ~ { ~C~'~t1p ... • DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 7 20 p m Tabe Van der zwaag May 15, 2007 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM17808 -WILLIAM ESPINOZA - A request to split a 75-acre parcel into two lots in the Low Residential district (2-4 dwelimg units per acre), located at northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Palo Alto Street - APN 1077-021-74 The project is categorically exempt from California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) under Section 15315 Minor Land Divisions Design Parameters The project site is located on the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Palo Alto Street on a 75 acre parcel The parcel is generally square m shape with an overall depth of about 175 feet from north to south and a width of 179 feet from east to west The lots to the north, south, east, and west are zoned Low Residential with developed single-family residences The existing topography slopes from about 1,323 feet at the north property line to about 1,314 feet at the south property line The applicant proposes subdividing the site into two lots There is an existing house on the site which will be on future Parcel 1 Parcel 2 will be developed with asingle-family residence that will be moved to the site from a location on Foothill Boulevard Parcel 1 will be accessed from .Archibald Avenue, and Parcel 2 will be accessed from Palo Alto Street Parcel 1 will be 10,346 square feet, and Parcel 2 will be 22,239 square feet The proposed lots comply with all City development standards • Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval by the Committee of the proposed parcel map as submitted to the Planning Commission • Design Review Committee Action Members Present Munoz, Stewart, and Diaz Staff Planner Tabe van der Zwaag The project was approved as presented and cleared to move forward to the Planning Commission for final approval EXHIBIT E F-7 • RESOLUTION NO 07-31 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM17808, A REQUEST TO SUBDIVIDE A 75 ACRE PARCEL INTO TWO LOTS IN THE LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (2-4 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), LOCATED AT NORTHEAST CORNER OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE AND PALO ALTO STREET AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN 1077-022-74 A Recitals 1 William Espinoza filed an application for the approval of Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM17808, as described in the title of this Resolution Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Tentative Parcel Map request is referred to as "the application " 2 On the 13th day of June 2007, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date 3 All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred B Resolution • NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows 1 This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on June 13, 2007, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby speafically finds as follows a The application applies to property located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Palo Alto Street, and b The subject property is within the Low Residential District and is presently developed with one single-family residence that is accessible by Archibald Avenue and will be preserved in place The site generally slopes from north to south, and c The project is surrounded by single-family residential development to the north, south, east, and west, and d The applicant proposes subdividing 75 acre of land into two lots Lot 1 will include the existing single-family residence, and Lot 2 will have asingle-family residence moved onto it from a site on Foothill Boulevard, and i e Lot 1 will gain access from Archibald Avenue and Lot 2 with gain access from Palo Alto Street, and F-8 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 07-31 SUBTPM17808 -WILLIAM ESPINOZA June 13, 2007 Page 2 f The proposed lots meet all City requirements including width, depth, and size The average lot size is 16,293 square feet, which exceeds the 8,000 square foot average required in the Low Residential District The proposed lot sizes are as follows Lot 1 10,346 s ware feet Lot 2 22,239 s care feet Avera e Lot Size 16,293 s uare feet 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth m Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows a The Tentative Parcel Map is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable specific plans, and b The design or improvements of the Tentative Parcel Map is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable specific plans, and c The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed, and • d The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable intury to humans and wildlife or their habitat, and • e The Tentative Parcel Map is not likelyto cause serious public health problems, and f The design of the Tentative Parcel Map will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision 4 Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the protect will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows a The Planning Department staff has determined that the protect is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines The protect qualifies under the Class 15 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15315 which covers the division of residentially zoned property in urbanized areas into four or fewer parcels when the division is in conformance with the General Plan, zoning regulations and no variances are required Because the applicant proposes to do a two-lot subdivision that meets all City requirements, staff finds that there is no substantial evidence that the protect may have a significant effect on the environment The Planning Commission has reviewed the Planning Department's determination of exemption, and based on its own independent tudgment, concurs in the staff's determination of exemption • F-9 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 07-31 SUBTPM17808 -WILLIAM ESPINOZA June 13, 2007 • Page 3 5 Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference Planning Department 1) All perimeter walls shall be decorative and have a uniform design that is compatible with those in the area 2) The Grading Plan submitted at time of Plan Check will need to show Lot 1 draining to Archibald Avenue or show proof that the blanket drainage easement have been obtained that permits Lot 1 to drain onto Lot 2 3) Front yard landscaping and irrigation shall be installed on Lot 2 prior to final occupancy Minimum required front yard landscaping shall include one 15-gallon size tree, one 5-gallon size tree, seeded ground cover, and a permanent irrigation system 4) Development of the site shall be in substantial conformance to the site plan approved by the Design Review Committee on May 15, 2007 • Engineering Department 1) Archibald Avenue frontage improvements are to be m accordance with City "Mayor Arterial" standards as required and including a) Protect existing curb, gutter, street lights, and sidewalk b) Reconstruct the existing access ramp at the corner to City Standards c) Protect existing R26(s) "No Stopping" signs d) No new driveways to Archibald Avenue 2) Palo Alto Street Frontage improvements are to be m accordance with City "Local Street" standards as required and including a) Provide two (2) 5800 Lumens, HPSV street lights, drive approach, and street trees as required b) Protect existing cub, gutter, and sidewalk c) Provide traffic signing and striping, as required • 3) Upon development of Parcel 2, submit a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) that follows current WQMP templates, guidance and regulations set forth by the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWOCB) Access the following website for an updated San F -10 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 07-31 SUBTPM17808 -WILLIAM ESPINOZA June 13, 2007 Page 4 Bernardino County Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) for New Development and Redevelopment Projects http //www swrcb ca gov/rwgcb8/html/sb-wgmp html The site provides Guidance and Templates that can be filled out electronically and printed out Adhere to the guidelines and use the templates provided Also, include the Best Management Practices (BMPs) identified in the plan on the Grading Plan when submitted for Plan Check 4) Provide drainage easement on final map over Parcel 2 in favor of Parcel 1 Also, if existing lots to the north drain over the subject property then provide drainage easement over Parcels 1 and 2 in favor of Lot 13 and Lot 14 of Tract 16344 6 The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 13TH DAY OF JUNE 2007 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY • Pam Stewart, Chairman ATTEST James R Troyer, AICP I, James R Troyer, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 13th day of June 2007, by the following vote-to-wit AYES COMMISSIONERS NOES COMMISSIONERS ABSENT COMMISSIONERS • F11 ;tip ~~ , ~= - _ }.~ ti COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT # TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM17808 SUBJECT. TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP APPLICANT WILLIAM ESPINOZA LOCATION- 7461 ARCHIBALD AVENUE - APN 1077-022-74 ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS l R G Completion Date enera equirements ~. 1 The a Ilcant sh II pp a agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the Clty, Its _/_/_ agents, officers, or employees, because of the Issuance of such approval, or In the alternative, to relinquish such approval The applicant shall reimburse the City, Its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, Its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at Its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition 2 Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No 07-31 and Standard _/ / Conditions shall be included on the plans (full size) The sheet(s) are for Information only to all _ _ parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect 3 The applicant shall be required to pay any applicable Flsh and Game fees as shown below The _/_/_ project planner will confirm which fees apply to this project All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to the Planning Commission or Planning Director hearing a) Notice of Exemption - $50 B. Time Limits 1 Tentative parcel map shall expire, unless extended by the Planning Commission, unless a _/_/_ complete final map is filed with the Clty Engineer within 3 years from the date of the approval • I \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2007 Res & Stf Rpt\SUBTPM17808StdCond 5-29 doc F12 Project No SUBTPM17808 Completion Date C. Site Development 1 The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which Include _/_/~ site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file In the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, and Development Code regulations 2 Prior to any use of the project site, all Conditions of Approval shall be completed to the _/_/_ satisfaction of the Planning Director 3 Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Building Code and _/_/_ State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Department to show compliance The buildings shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy 4 Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be _/_/_ submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits 5 All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for _/_/_ consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first 6 Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all _/_/_ other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the time of building permit issuance 7 All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc ,shall be _/_/_ located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the Planning Director For single-family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults 8 All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, _/_/_ Including proper illumination 9 Six-foot decorative block walls shall be constructed along the project perimeter If a double wall _/_/_ condition would result, the developer shall make a good faith effort to work with the adjoining property owners to provide a single wall Developer shall notify, by mail, all contiguous property owner at least 30 days prior to the removal of any existing walls/ fences along the project's perimeter 10 Construct block walls between homes (i e ,along interior side and rear property lines), rather than _/_/_ wood fencing for permanence, durability, and design consistency 11 For residential development, return walls and corner side walls shall be decorative masonry _/_/_ 12 On corner side yards, provide minimum 5-foot setback between walls/fences and sidewalk The _/_/_ 5-foot wall/fence setback and the parkway shall have landscape and irrigation in addition to the required street trees Detailed landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to issuance of building permits The parkway landscaping including trees, shrubs, ground covers and irrigation shall be maintained by the property owner The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the parkway maintenance requirement, in a standard format as determined by the Planning Director, prior to accepting a cash deposit on any property 2 I \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2007 Res & Stf Rpt\SUBTPM17808StdCond 5-29 doc F13 Protect No SUBTPM17808 D. Parking and Vehicular Access (indicate details on building plans) 1 Multiple car garage driveways shall be tapered down to a standard two-car width at street E. Landscaping Landscaping and Irrigation systems required to be Installed within the public right-of-way on the perimeter of this project area shall be continuously maintained by the developer APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS NOTE ANY REVISIONS MAY VOID THESE REQUIREMENTS AND NECESSITATE ADDITIONAL REVIEW(S) F. General Requirements 1 Submit five complete sets of plans Including the following a Site/Plot Plan, b Foundation Plan, c Floor Plan, d Celling and Roof Framing Plan, e Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) Including the size of the main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single Ilne diagrams, • f Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including Isometrics, underground diagrams, water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning, and g Planning Department Project Number (SUBTPM17808) clearly Identified on the outside of all plans 2 Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a soils report Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are required prior to plan check submittal 3 Contractors must show proof of State and Clty licenses and Workers' Compensation coverage to the City prior to permit Issuance 4 Separate permits are required for fencing and/or walls G. Site Development Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction All plans shall be marked with the project file number (SUBTPM1808) The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted California Codes, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application Contact the Building and Safety Department for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts 2 Prior to issuance of building permits for a new residential project or mayor addition, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate Such fees may Include, but are not limited to City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Check Fees, Construction and Demolition Diversion Program deposit and fees and School Fees Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Building and Safety • Department prior to permit issuance 3 I \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2007 Res & Stf Rpt\SUBTPM17808StdCond 5-29 doc Completion Date -/-/ -/-/- T/-/. -/_/. -/-/. -/-/- _/_/ -/-/- F14 Project No SUBTPM17808 Completion Date 3 Street addresses shall be provided by the Building and Safety Official after tract/parcel map _/_/_ recordation and prior to issuance of building permits 4 Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m Monday • _/_/_ through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays H. New Structures 1 Provide compliance with the California Building Code (CBC) for property line clearances _/_/_ considering use, area, and fire-resistiveness 2 Provide compliance with the California Building Code for required occupancy separations _/_/_ 3 Roofing material shall be installed per the manufacturer's "high wind" instructions _/_/_ i. Grading 1 Grading of thQ subject property shall be in accordance with California Building Code, City Grading _/_/_ Standards, and accepted grading practices The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved grading plan 2 A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to _/_/_ perform such work 3 A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the _/_/ time of application for grading plan check 4 The final grading plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, _/_/_ submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of building permits 5 A separate grading plan check submittal is required for all new construction protects and for _/_/ • existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill The grading plan shall be prepared, stamped, and signed by a California registered Civil Engineer APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS. J. Dedication and Vehicular Access 1 Corner property line cutoffs shall be dedicated per City Standards _/_/_ 2 Private drainage easements for cross-lot drainage shall be provided and shall be delineated or _/_/_ noted on the final map 3 All existing easements lying within future rights-of-way shall bequit-claimed or delineated on the _/_/_ final map K. Street Improvements 1 Pursuant to City Council Resolution No 88-557, no person shall make connections from a source _/_/_ of energy, fuel or power to any building service equipment which is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Council, except that in developments containing more than one building or unit the development may have energy connections made to a ercenta e of • , p g 4 I \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2007 Res & Stf Rpt\SUBTPM17808StdCond 5-29 doc F15 Project No SUBTPM17808 those buildings, or units proportionate to the completion of Improvements as required by conditions of approval of development In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings or • units be connected to energy prior to completion and acceptance of all Improvements required by these condltlons of approval of development 2 Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to Street Name Curb & Gutter A.C Pvmt Side- walk Drive Appr Street Lights Street Trees Comm Trail Median Island Bike Trail Other Archibald Avenue (e) Palo Alto Street X X X (e) Notes (a) Median Island Includes landscaping and irrigation on meter (b) Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check (c) If so marked, sidewalk shall be curvilinear per Standard 114 (d) If so marked, an In-lieu of construction fee shall be provided for this Item (e) Reconstruct existing access ramp to City Standards Improvement Plans and Construction a Street Improvement plans, Including street trees, street Ilghts, and Intersection safety Ilghts on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the Clty Engineer Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the publlcand/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the Issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first b Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office in addition to any other permits required c Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and interconnect conduit shall be Installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer d Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction project along mayor or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the Clty Engineer Notes 1) Pull boxes shall be No 6 at intersections and No 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer 2) Conduit shall be 3-Inch galvanized steel with pull rope or as specified e Handicapped access ramps shall be installed on all corners of Intersections per Clty Standards or as directed by the City Engineer f Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction Street or lane closure permits are required A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer g Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to Clty Standards, except for single family residential lots h Street names shall be approved by the Planning Director prior to submittal for first plan check 5 I \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2007 Res & Stf Rpt\SUBTPM17808StdCond 5-29 doc F16 Completion Date -~-~- -~_~. -~_~ _/_/ -~-~- -~-/. -~-~- / / -~-~- Project No SUBTPM17808 4 Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be Installed per City Standards in accordance with the City's street tree program 5 Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows The completed legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on sheet_(typically sheet 1) " Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans The City Engineer reserves the right to adjust tree species based upon field conditions and other variables For additional Information, contact the Project Engineer Mm Grow Street Name Botanical Name Common Name Space Spacing Size Qty Palo Alto Street Pistacia chinensis Chinese Pistache 5 ft 30 ft o c 15-gal Construction Notes for Street Trees 1) All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City inspector Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill soil amendments, as determined by the City Inspector 3) All street trees are subject to Inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Department 4) Street trees are to be planted per public Improvement plans only 6 Intersection Ilne of sight designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with adopted policy On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all project intersections, Including driveways Local residential street intersections and commercial or industrial driveways may have Imes of sight plotted as required L. Public Maintenance Areas A signed consent and waiver form to loin and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be flied with the City Engineer prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits whichever occurs first Formation costs shall be borne by the developer M. Drainage and Flood Control Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surface drainage entering the property from adjacent areas N. Improvement Completion If the required public improvements are not completed prior to approval of the final parcel map, an improvement certificate shall be placed upon the final parcel map, stating that they will be completed upon development for Parcel 2 O. Utilities Provide separate utility services to each parcel Including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards Easements shall be provided as required 2 The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary Completion Date -/-/- _/_/ -/-/. -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/-/. • I \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2007 Res & Stf Rpt\SUBTPM17808StdCond 5-29 doc F17 Project No SUBTPM17808 3 Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the Cucamonga Valley W ater District (CVW D), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the • Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino A letter of compliance from the CVW D is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects 4 Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved Approval of the final parcel map will be subject to any requirements that may be received from them P. General Requirements and Approvals A non-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all new streetlights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to building permit issuance if no map is involved APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DEPARTMENT, FIRE PROTECTION PLANNING SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS• SEE ATTACHED • • 7 i \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2007 Res & Stf Rpt\SUBTPM17808StdCond 5-29 doc Completion Date -~-~- -~-~- -~-~- F18 ~`\ `~ ~ \~ ~~~ -' ~ k' ~,.(~~~ • t h e city o f Rancho Cucamonga Stiff Report DATE June 13, 2007 TO Planning Commission FROM James R Troyer, AICP, Planning Director BY Daniel Correa, Planning Technician SUBJECT MODIFICATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO 85-37 - DRC2007-00134 - EL POLLO LOCO RESTAURANT - A request to expand the floor area of the existing fast food restaurant by approximately 1,091 square feet in the Deer Creek Shopping Center in the General Commercial (GC) District, located at 7746 Haven Avenue - APN 1077-401-31 The Planning Department staff has determined that • the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines The project qualifies as a Class 1 Exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15301 (e) 2, Existing Facilities PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION A Project Description The applicant is proposing to expand and remodel the existing EI Pollo Loco fast food restaurant in the Deer Creek Village Shopping Center on the west side of Haven Avenue dust north of Foothill Boulevard The proposal includes an expansion of approximately 1,091 square feet, including 661 6 square feet for the new, expanded dining room, 394 square feet customer restrooms, and 35 16 square feet for the outside patio area This will be accomplished by raising the existing, unoccupied 1,750 square foot dental office north of the existing EI Pollo Loco restaurant The dental office building does not have any historical or present significant use The original Conditional Use Permit (CUP) for the existing fast food restaurant was approved in 1987 SITE DESCRIPTION A Surrounding Land Use and Zoning Site - Fast Food Restaurant /General Commercial (GC) North - General Commercial (GC) • South = General Commercial (GC) East Office Professional, in the Terra Vista Plan Community West - Industrial Park -Subarea 17 across San Bernardino Flood Control District ITEM G PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT MODIFICATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO 85-37 - DRC2007-00134 June 13, 2007 Page 2 B Site Characteristics The EI Poilo Loco fast food restaurant, is located within the • 33,976 8 square foot Deer Creek Village Shopping Center in the General Commercial (GC) District on the northwest corner of Town Center Drive and Haven Avenue EI Pollo Loco restaurant will increase its floor area by 1,091 57 square feet, for a total floor area of 3,201 57 square feet ANALYSIS A Background Pursuant to Development Code Section 17 04 030 G 1, EI Pollo Loco is a fast food restaurant with adrive -thru lane use that requires a Conditional Use Permit B Use Description Typically, EI Pollo Loco restaurant is a fast food sit-down eatery that serves Mexican style galled chicken and salad for consumption on the premises or for take out It provides indoor and outdoor patron seating C Hours of operation The hours of operations will remain the same While the employees report to work at 7 30 a m each day of the week, the establishment is open to the general public from 9 00 a m to 10 00 p m , Monday through Saturday, and 11 00 a m to 10 00 p m on Sundays D Land Use Compatibility The property is in the General Commercial (GC) in the General Plan Land Use Element The GC District designation allows for a range of retail, personal and professional services, including drive-thru lane fast food restaurants As such, the existing fast food restaurant, with a drive-thru lane, is consistent with the intended uses allowed in the GC District and, therefore, is compatible with the other retail commercial uses within the shopping center E Parkin Required parking for a fast foot restaurant use is 1 parking space for every 75 square feet When the project is completed, the EI Pollo Loco restaurant will have a total floor area of 3,201 square feet, requiring a minimum of 43 on-site parking spaces At present, there are 31 parking spaces on-site, but when the dental office building is demolished, 6 new parking spaces will be added on-site for a total of 37 spaces, leaving a deficit of 7 parking spaces necessary to support the use Staff believes the deficit of parking spaces can be accommodated by relying on a recorded reciprocal parking agreement for the larger center in which the subJect site is located At the time the entire center was approved, 574 on-site parking spaces were provided, when only 446 spaces were required, thereby leaving a parking surplus of 128 spaces The majority of uses in the center are retail and services with a few restaurant uses, including a deli, an Indian restaurant, an Italian restaurant, and the EI Pollo Loco restaurant use Staff visited the site on numerous occasions noting that while prime parking spaces are always in demand, particularly at lunchtime, there remains available parking in the center With the shared parking agreement, the 7 needed parking spaces can be absorbed into the surplus at the center With this use, staff does not anticipate any significant parking impacts F Environmental Assessment The application is exempt per Section 15301 (e) (2) of the California Environmental Quality Act It is a Class 1 Categorical Exemption because the • G-2 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT MODIFICATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO 85-37 - DRC2007-00134 June 13, 2007 • Page 3 development, which is permissible per the General Plan In addition, there is no substantial evidence that the project may have a significant effect on the environment The Planning Commission has reviewed the Planning Department's determination of exemption, and based on its own independent judgment, concurs with staff's determination of exemption CORRESPONDENCE This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 660-foot radius of the project site Staff has not received any letters or phone calls expressing concern over the Conditional Use Permit RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of Conditional Use Permit DRC2007-00134 through the adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval with Conditions Respectfully submitted, ~- Ja es R Troyer, AICP Planning Director • JT MD/ge Attachments Exhibit A - Site Plan/Aerial Photograph Exhibit B - Floor Plan Exhibit C - Tenant List Exhibit D - Statement of Operation and Request for CUP Exhibit E - Copy of Recorded Reciprocal Parking Agreement • G-3 DEER (;REEK VILLAG E PLAZA 7890, 7930, 7900 HAVEN AVE. (Passed FoothilUI~aven Ave & Town Centex Dz~ive) Leasing Office - 7400 Haven, Suite # 25 Rancho Cucamonga CA. 91730 _ ,~- Phone # {909) 476-6664 SITE PL.Al`~ ~~~ 7930 BAUNBWICK DEHR CRBFdC LAN88 ~ 14I BRUNS'WICKREGIONAL~FFiCE.S i 1 BALANCBU L)PB CH]R.OPSACTIC # 3 LA QF]].ATBRIA- ICg C7tHAM PARLO& N 5 W&i(tST WATCKIIiS # 6 KRAV MAGA # 7 LINDA'S NAIL & SPA ~ 8 1T FIGURES ~ # 9 THE OANIE RIDWrI GALLIIt'Y # 10 'IITTOR Wffi2, lids. # it MASSAGS{.'BNTEEt # 12 LIBffitTY TAX SERVICE # 13 WELLS FARGO FINANCIAL # 14 LIATi1 ~ A88OCIATB8 • D18URATiCE M 15&.16 IIANAIDIII+iDIANRB3TAURANT # 17 DEBR CABSg VISION CBSJI~R # 18 EXPRESS P58SONNSL SERVICES # 14 ULTIMATB TAE KWON DO # 20 HAIlt SALON # 21 TH$ COMPETPftYE EDGE # 22 NATIONAL R&ALTY GROUP # 23 HAVEN FOOD STORE # 24 DELI SANDWICH OOMPANY # Z3 B~16 HL-LINE MiTSIC # 25 DEER CREEK VII.LAOF, PLAZA LBASIIIG OFFICE EXHIBIT A • • G-4 ~~OJ~ 7 ~.. ~~ - V ~ i~ t d r z~ ~~q} ~g;} ~~ ~~ ~' ~~~ Qs ~~° -- • ~ ~ ; ~, ,(;~ . , ~ ~ r,~~., v r; ~, c G ,~" ~,. ~ C ~~ C~ r s ~~ ,,~~~ E ~, ~ ~ e „ Q~ ~K tr •i EXHIBIT B . ~ ~~~~~d ~ o fi ~w d~ > / ~. ~~~d ~ O '^` r ~ ~ ~~~' I .,, •,<~ w `~•'" `~ ~ ~ ~'~' t ' ,,pr~y.'y-~++~~~"ap~~ ~/ ~z ~ym2i ~~~~ ~~ ~,4 V- n °'`. w - ~, ~,. ~ f~' ~ ~ / ~ f~` i ,°"~~ /~ ? ~ ~` ~~r ~ ~ ~ O< ~~ ~°i , s ~. - } 2 e ~ ~ d Q u - m G-5 j ~~ ~ • ~`~ N°~~~ r ~ o~ N ~ ~ a ~ 4, v ~ m as ~ r ~ C7 = ~ ~~ ~ d ~a~ig~ ~~ ~ 4~ ~ z~¢jC9~ ~~d a. °D c~zG.a~ ~-o .q~ Dodo gW ~ ¢ ~~zd'~'~z ~~g ~ z t° Q ~ 1-~p~ ~cAvtn ~ ~ `~~Z~ ~ ~Qd ~ Z~ Q Qg~~ ENO ~ ~ ~~~QO~~ c~co~t~ ~~ ~ ~c~gao ~~U OC~ c4~~,yZ~o~W W~O~-W ,~ ¢ . 3 Z V X N ~ ~ ~ ~ ¢rn ~ d ~ ~ O J W ° Q ¢ ~ O ~ _ Q 0 ay ~ ~ ~ etS Ci to ~ ~ Wit-- 2~ti~u..~ ~?~ o~ ~`O ~ ~ ~ LL ~ T wz ~~ ~~ °' z~ ~ d ~ ~ t- ch ~n c~ S • c ~ ~j N r" ?k 1i~ aft ~ 1~ ~ a O o ~ d~ ~~Q ~ ti ~~. g ti D ~ °~ z ~, w ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ Wo~ ~~ Z Q ~ ~ ~ CJ Q ~ ~ ~ ~ >® Q Z U IW- 10- •~ ~ Q' ~ 1~lJ i4 ~ ~ L1J g ~` J W ~ ~ _ ~[ 4- LU ~ ~C ~ ~ N ~ ^ c Y = ~ ~ ~ ~ ~oz ~~ ~ ~ ~ g ~ > d ~~~ cn ~ z ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ m m EX ~ I B I1' ~ y ~ ~ ~ ~~ . F ~ ~~ .u,oa~ G-6 • d ~ N p d' O ~f' ~ t0 ~ ~ r = ~ ~ ~- ~ Q. ~- ~ ~ ~y ~ 2 ~ ~ g~ ~~ ~~~ ~~ ~U ~ ~~~z a~ ~~ ~~ ~~ , ~ cn ~- ~ o F- °`~ Q ¢ a 4 i~ a I S ~^ v~~a Z '~ r CJQ stn ~~ ~ og CG w ~m~ ~^ ~ z ~W z ~^ ~ ~~. c ~ ~ ~ O ~ ~ ~~ N ~ ova ~N ~~ ~Q LL O~ '.~ OF= z ~ p~.~c^ri a wQ ~~ Za z ~ ~ RS ~ ~ g ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ Z ~ Q ° r ~ `~ o ~ • r„ m ~ O r N M ~ ~1] r.. cC r r CD r r N N r M r e- F- ~ (,~ ~ ~ W 4 ~ tL' U U ~ ~ W v w ~. z ~ vi ~ w ~ z z~ Z ~ ~ z w '~ j ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N ~ .g ~ ~ a ti w o ~, ~ ~ «c ~ ww a z ~ ~ ~ ® ~ ~ o ~ ~, ~ ~ g ~ w ~ = O X UJ i • mOfL00'd l60# L~=~ 90QZ/8~/60 :mad G-7 P ~ ~ ~ ~~ r ~( ~~ N N ~~ ~~ ~ N~ ~ t! ~ ~ 1T N ~` a ~z ~ ~g ~ petss~ d~a ~ °~°°w tip ° °~`" ~~ ~ ~~m Q xs n.Q ~~ ~ ~y ~- p -~~ ~ ~~ry'~ ~~ ~'~ Of/~ Q ~W OQ O Q w ~ ~- cn w ur cs ~ ,U '~ ~ ~ ~ O '- ~ ~ ~~ ~~ u.0 a ~~,v z v~ o ~ ^ V p~ ~{~ ~y ~~ ~ _~~ p ~ ~ U ~ ~ N N N N N N S ~ ~ g $ g ~ ~ ~ r tK7 cq c'? ~ N r U Z ~` U ~ W U a ~ ~ ~ g ~ w w g Q U ~ ~ o z cn ~ ~ F ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ° a^r ~ ~ ~ o w ~ w~ d a~ ~ ~~ ~ ~z ~ ~a Z~ 4~.QU~ 1 • • I~ EDO/6(l0' d l60# 8£:6{l 9002/8Z/60 G-8 :~~~ Rpr 10 07 09:52a Inland Foods 9096352021 p.l • Inland Foods LLC d/b/a EI Pollo loco PO Box 3239 Rancho Cucamonga, CR 91729 Tel: 909-535-2026 Fax 984-635-2021 Plann,ng Department Gty of Rancho Cucamonga Attent,on Dan,el Correa Re eI PoIIo Loco Restaurant 77~'j and 7756 Haven Avenue Statement o(Operat,on and Mod,~icat+on of the C U P The Proposed mod,f,cation ,s (ar an add,t+on of 1o9t sc~ ft to a 2.110 s9uar e foot restaurant and the demoht,on of a 175o s9uare foot dental aff,ce bu,ld,ng • Th,s +s ~ typical ~I PoIIo Loco restaurant It +s a fast food sit down fac,lity with a dr,ve thru Pick up window and ,ntenor p+ck up counter The ,nter,ar serv,ce ,s self-serv,ce The product screed ,s a Mexican style flame bro+led chicken w,th a number of s+de dishes such as salads, nee, beans etc The food +s sold for consumption on the prem,ses and for take out Over the yeas s there has been a growth of customers, therefore extra ,ntenor seat,ng +s needed to accommodate ,ts customers base and we also want to make sure that we prov,de better serv,ce and more comfort to our customers Por these reasons we are expand+ng the d,n,ng room The hours of operat,on for the Publ,c arc Monday-Saturday to 00 a m -f0,00 P m , Sunda, I1 Oo a m -10 OD p m and the employee hours are Monday-Saturday B 00 a rn -II p m , Sunday ~ 00 a m - {- 00 p rn and has 10 employees per sh,ft on the average Thank you, . ~ /~ - _ - Lonn+e R Pr+ester ~ P Owner ~~ G-9 04~Y1 i~~ ~nor~I LtO.~tb FAX ynyy4tlytytl742 ~r t Iti t e l l ~ U Yhtf; ~ r r1Mt~,~ ordarNo Ipgo 43~t-11 Escrow No 2557-SC LwnNo WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO RRC INVESTMENTS c/o STEPHEN DANIELS BROKE 8331 Ut1ta Ave. )itancho Cucamonga, CA. 917 ADNA L~t7CNgNIE PRIESTER PAGE 0002 ~-,. RECOOOEO tN OfRCfA! RECOttQS JAN l9 1987 A~ B:ODAM SAKI 9ERtItAlt~tNO COUNIY'r CAi.tt:. • 6''1014658 use MAIL TAX STATEMENTS TD ~~~ ~~~ ~.~ ~ ~r5.~..A~ ~_ _,,,,,,, ,~ FAMR A S ABOVF. _ Xi rompudd on uu eoeuW^fetbn or vdue of property t:orneV^d, oR Garnput^e on the camid^t^<ien or velup lea II^np or ^naum0unce r^m^Inlne et em^ of W e j'.TV7 .ES.~r.---- r e ^nKUn O•^ •r•nt or cant .t^rmin M uM - I,m N^m• D -22 CORPORATION GRAM' DEED FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, raaolpt of which la hereby seknowlodped, LEISERV, INC., done hereby a corporation orQanizad under the levee of the State of DelatAare GRANT to KRC INVESTMENTS, a California General Partnership the real property In the Gty of Rancho CuGamontJa Count of Sate of C^lifomle, d.wribed as Y San Bernardino Parcel 3 of Parcel Map 9487, ae recorded in Baok 110, pages 29 and 30 of Parcel Maps, rocords of Said County. Sub~ett to Declaration of Covenants, Conditions, Casements and Restrict2ons for Deer Creek Village Shopping Center recorded as instrument number 86--310707 on October 22, 1986, Office of San Bernardino County Recorder. Dated J1riuA: it ~4 ; 19 E7 _ ~ T.R!TCFAt7r_I.DL~' -~ -. , 1, L /,VQ rf I STATE OF ~Qr~ - ha couNn of p~.~ t1 .S +y yJ1 RY ~ H, ! ,~ ~ r tt.ta,.m^, By the und^ngned,^Ndryr+YDNe in ^ne }a ^^M $1.1r pn^on^eY^PW^1` /!~. G. rosld®nt end /~1r~tIL,~ I 17 " ~~.,c., r ~ ///~ prnonalM Icnavn to me fa pnavgd m m. on the o^eN of utW^etey By ~~ I[ wldene^1 m be the oeroone tvho orveuted fhe wltMn Itptrt^neM u retary //C~A..elo.m and 9•crt^N~ th^ coroor^tlon thw.in nursed, and acllnevAsdeW m me that Woh cor pw^Iron asea+t^d Ih^ WtMln in^Irum^M twrw^M to la by~lara ere • r^^olutlon d lu bc^fd d dlrwtwta WITNESS Int Mnd and dfieW aeeL 81gnMUn~Ci'k'K ~ ~~~ ~` - IThrt area 1w brticipl rnsarl^I wl) 1144 (8/82) ' _ MAIL TAX STATEMENTS AS DIRECTED A60VE ~~~"~~~~~ G10 04/13/07 FRI 10 26 FA% 310 450 4742 ADNA ARCH b4/1L/LnF9! LL:dl7 lyGyy4tlyLytl LUNNIE PTi1t5rE71 ~J 003 PAGE 0 • ry Leiseru or its successors, No refuse container shall be maintained on the Shopp111g Center property other than 1n khe location and manner provided for by le'iserv or its successors. 3,5 there shall be no intarf'arence with the established drainage patterns and systems ouer any portion of the Shopping Center unless adequate provision is made for proper drainage and is approved by leiserv or its successors. For the purposes hereof an "established drainage pattern and system" is defined as the drainage athich exists at the time the overall grading of the Shopping Center is completed or that urhich is shown on any plans approuQd by Leiseru or its successors, and includes, but is not necessarily ].invited to, underground drain pipes and pact®rnc of drainage ouer the Shopping Center from and • to adjoining properties and improvements, SECTI,~4,~ CERTAYN EA$EMENT9. 4 1 Th• owners and lessees of property in the Shopping Center are hereby granted nonexelusiue easeetents for (i) ingress, egress, pedestrian walkways and general use purposes ouer and upon the Common Area, and (11) vehicular and pedestrian ingress, egress and parking ouer thos® portions of each Owner's Lot which is improved for vehicular and pedestrian ingress, egress and parking purposes, following completion of the construction of such improuemer~ts by OWners, -10- G11 • RESOLUTION NO 07-32 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING MODIFICATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO 85-37 - DRC2007-00134 TO EXPAND THE FLOOR AREA OF THE EXISTING EL POLLO LOCO FAST FOOD RESTAURANT IN THE DEER CREEK VILLAGE SHOPPING CENTER IN THE GENERAL COMMERCIAL (GC) DISTRICT, LOCATED AT 7746 HAVEN AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN 1077-401-31 A Recitals 1 Armet Davis Newlove Architects on behalf of KRC Investment Company, LLC legal owner of EI Pollo Loco, filed an application to the modify Conditional Use Permit No 87-69, as described m the title of this Resolution Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Conditional Use Permit request is referred to as "the application " 2 On the 13th day of June 2007, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date 3 All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred • B Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows 1 This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on June 13, 2007, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows a The application applies to the property located at 7746 Haven Avenue with a street frontage of 245 feet and lot depth of 165 feet and which is presently improved with a building, parking, and landscaping, and b The property to the north of the subject site is General Commercial (GC), the property to the south consists of General Commercial (GC), the property to the east is Office Professional (OP) in the Terra Vista Plan Community, and the property to the west is Industrial Park (IP), and c The EI Pollo Loco restaurant proposes to expand its total floor area by 1,091 square feet for a new total restaurant size of 3,201 square feet • d The hours of operations will remain the same The employees working hours will continue to be between 7 30 a m and 10 00 p m each day of the week, however, the establishment will only be opened to the general public from 9 00 a m to 10 00 p m Monday through Saturday and 11 00 a m to 10 00 p m on Sundays, and G12 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 07-32 DRC2007-00134 - ARMET DAVIS NEWLOVE ARCHITECTS MAY 9, 2007 Page 2 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows a The proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located b The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity c The proposed use complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code 4 The Planning Department Staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines The project qualifies under the Class 1 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15301 (e) (2) because the project is m an area where all public services and facilities are available for maximum development, which is permissible perthe General Plan In addition, there is no substantial evidence that the project may have a significant effect on the environment The Planning Commission has reviewed the Planning Department's determination of exemption, and based on its own independent judgment, concurs in the staff's determination of exemption • 5 Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth m paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, • the Planning Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and m the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference Planning Department 1) The approval is for the remodeling and addition of 1,091 square feet to the existing EI Pollo Loco fast food restaurant located at 7746 Haven Avenue m the General Commercial (GC) District, m the Deer Creek Village Shopping Center The total size of the restaurant after remodeling shall be 3,201 square feet 2) The hours of operations shall remain from 9 00 a m to 10 00 p m Monday through Saturday and from 11 00 a m to 10 00 p m on Sundays Any modification of these hours shall require the review and approval by the Planning Commission of a modified Conditional Use Permit 3) Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with any sections of the Development Code, State Fire Marshal's regulations, Uniform Building Code, or any other City Ordinances 4) The business shall operate in conformance with the performance standards as defined in the Development Code including, but not limited to, noise levels If the operation of the facility causes adverse • effects upon the adjacent businesses or operations, the Conditional Use Permit may be reviewed by the Planning Commission for consideration and possible termination of the use G13 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 07-32 DRC2007-00134 - ARMET DAVIS NEWLOVE ARCHITECTS MAY 9, 2007 Page 3 • 5) Any modification or intensification of the use beyond what is specifically approved by this Conditional Use Permit shall require review and approval by the Planning Commission 6) All signs, including special advertising or event signs are subject to Uniform Sign Program #180 and the City's Sign Ordinance A Sign Permit application is required for review and approval by the Planning Department prior to installation 6 The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 13TH DAY OF JUNE 2007 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY Pam Stewart, Chairman • ATTEST James R Troyer, AICP, Secretary I, James R Troyer, AICP, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 13th day of June 2007, by the following vote-to-wit AYES COMMISSIONERS NOES COMMISSIONERS ABSENT COMMISSIONERS G14 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #. MODIFICATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO 85-37 - DRC2007-00134 SUBJECT EI POLLO LOCO APPLICANT ARMET DAVIS NEWLOVE ARCHITECTS LOCATION 7746 HAVEN AVENUE - APN 1077-401-31 ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPL Y TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS General Requirements 1 The appllcant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, Its agents, officers, or employees, because of the Issuance of such approval, or In the alternative, to relinquish such approval The applicant shall reimburse the City, Its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees maybe required by a court to pay as a result of such action The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at Its own expense In the defense of any such actlon but such participation shall not relieve appllcant of his obligations under this condition 2 Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No 07-32, Standard Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size) The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties Involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect 3 The applicant shall be required to pay any applicable Fish and Game fees as shown below The project planner will confirm which fees apply to this project All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to the Planning Commission hearing a) Notice of Exemption - $50 X b) Notice of Determination - $50 c) Mitigated/Negative Declaration - $ 1,850 d) Environmental Impact Report - $2,550 • SC-1-05 Completion Date -/-/- -/_/ -/-/- I \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2007 Res & Stf Rpt\DRC2007-00134StdCond 6 13 doc G15 Project No DRC2007 00134 Completion Date B. Time Limits 1 Development/Design Review approval shall expire if building permits are not issued or approved _/_/_ use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval No extensions are allowed • C. Site Development 1 The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include _/_/_ site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, and Development Code regulations 2 Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions _/_/_ of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director 3 Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Building Code and _/_/_ State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Department to show compliance The buildings shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy 4 Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be _/_/_ submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits 5 All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for _/_f_ consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first 6 Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all _/_/_ other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the time of building permit issuance • 7 Trash receptacle(s) are required and shall meet City standards The final design, locations, and _/_/_ the number of trash receptacles shall be subject to Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits D. Shopping Centers 1 Provide for the following design features in each trash enclosure, to the satisfaction of the _/_/_ Planning Director a Large enough to accommodate two trash bins _/_/_ b Architecturally treated overhead shade trellis _/_/_ c Chain link screen on top to prevent trash from blowing out of the enclosure and designed _/_/_ to be hidden from view 2 Graffiti shall be removed within 72 hours / / 3 The entire site shall be kept free from trash and debris at all times and in no event shall trash and _/_/_ debris remain for more than 24 hours E. Building Design 1 All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted equipment and/or _/_/_ projections, shall be shielded from view and the sound buffered from adjacent properties and streets as required by the Planning Department Such screening shall be architecturally integrated with the building design and constructed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director Details shall be included in building plans • 2 G16 Protect No DRC2007-00134 2 For commercial and industrial projects, paint roll-up doors and service doors to match main building colors ~. Parking and Vehicular Access (Indicate details on buildin tans 9p 1 All new parking spaces shall be 9 feet wide by 18 feet long When a side of any parking space abuts a building, wall, support column, or other obstruction, the space shall be a minimum of 11 feet wide 2 All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles, entrances, and exits shall be striped per City standards 3 Handicap accessible stalls shall be provided for commercial and office facilities with 25 or more parking stalls Designate two percent or one stall, whichever is greater, of the total number of stalls for use by the handicapped G Trip Reduction Bicycle storage spaces shall be provided in all commercial, office, industrial, and multifamily residential protects of more than 10 units Minimum spaces equal to five percent of the required automobile parking spaces or three bicycle storage spaces, whichever is greater After the first 50 bicycle storage spaces are provided, additional storage spaces required are 2 5 percent of the required automobile parking spaces Warehouse distribution uses shall provide bicycle storage spaces at a rate of 2 5 percent of the required automobile parking spaces with a minimum of a 3-bike rack fn no case shall the total number of bicycle parking spaces required exceed 100 Where this results in a fraction of 0 5 or greater, the number shall be rounded off to the higher whole number H. Landscaping • 1 A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision 2 Within parking lots, trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15-gallon tree for every three parking stalls I. Signs 1 The signs indicated on the submitted plans are conceptual only and not a part of this approval Any signs proposed for this development shall comply with the Sign Ordinance and shall require separate application and approval by the Planning Department prior to installation of any signs APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS NOTE ANY REVISIONS MAY VOID THESE REQUIREMENTS AND NECESSITATE ADDITIONAL REVIEW(S) J. General Requirements 1 Submit five complete sets of plans including the following a Site/Plot Plan, b Foundation Plan, c Floor Plan, d Ceiling and Roof Framing Plan, • e Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of the main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams, f Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams, water and waste 3 G17 Completion Date -/-/. -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- Project No DRC2007-00134 diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning, and g Planning Department Protect Number (i e , DRC2007-00134) clearly identified on the outside of all plans 2 Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a soils report Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are required prior to plan check submittal 3 Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers' Compensation coverage to the City prior to permit issuance 4 Separate permits are required for fencing and/or walls 5 Business shall not open for operation prior to posting the Certificate of Occupancy issued by the Building and Safety Department K. Site Development 1 Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction All plans shall be marked with the protect file number (DRC2007-00134) The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted California Codes, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application Contact the Building and Safety Department for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts 2 Prior to issuance of building permits for a new residential protect or mator addition, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate Such fees may include, but are not limited to City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Check Fees, Construction and Demolition Diversion Program deposit and fees and School Fees Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Building and Safety Department prior to permit issuance 3 Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m Monday through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays 4 Construct trash enclosure(s) per City Standard (available at the Planning Department's public counter) L. New Structures Provide compliance with the California Building Code for required occupancy separations Plans for food preparation areas shall be approved by County of San Bernardino Environmental Health Services prior to issuance of building permits APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS M. Dedication and Vehicular Access Reciprocal parking agreements for all parcels and maintenance agreements ensuring toint maintenance of all common roads, drives, or parking areas shall be provided by CC & R's or deeds and shall be recorded prior to, or concurrent with, the final parcel map APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DEPARTMENT, FIRE PROTECTION PLANNING SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SEE ATTACHED 4 Completion Date • -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- _/_/_ • -/-/- -/-~ -/_~ -/-/- • G18 ~a~oe „ v Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District _~ Fire Construction Services i STANDARD CONDITIONS May 24, 2007 EI Pollo Loco KRC Investments 7756 Haven Ave Building Addition and Remodel DRC2007-00134 THE FOLLOWING STANDARD CONDITIONS APPLY TO THIS PROJECT The building will be required to be equipped with Automatic Fire Sprinklers The RCFPD Procedures & Standards which are referenced in this document can be access on the web at http //www ci rancho-Cucamonga ca us/fire/index htm under the Fire Safety Division & Fire Construction Services section Search by article, the preceding number of the standard refers to the article Chose the appropriate article number then a drop down menu will appear, select the corresponding standard FSC-1 Public and Private Water Supply • Design guidelines for Fire Hydrants The following provides design guidelines for the spacing and location of fire hydrants a The maximum distance between fire hydrants mcommercial/industrial protects is 300-feet No portion of the exterior wall shall be located more than 150-feet from an approved fire hydrant For cul-de-sacs, the distance shall not exceed 100-feet b Fire hydrants are to be located The preferred locations for fire hydrants are At the entrance(s) to a commercial, industrial or residential protect from the public roadways ii At intersections iii On the right side of the street, whenever practical and possible iv As required by the Fire Safety Division to meet operational needs of the Fire District v A minimum of forty-feet (40') from any building c If any portion of a facility or building is located more than 150-feet from a public fire hydrant measured on an approved route around the exterior of the facility or building, additional private or public fire hydrants and mains capable of supplying the required fire flow shall be provided d Provide one fire hydrant for each 1000 gpm of required fire flow or fraction thereof ~C-2 Fire Flow 1 The required minimum fire flow for this protect, when automatic fire sprinklers are installed is 1500 gallons per minute at a minimum residual pressure of 20-pounds per square inch This flow reflects a 50- percent reduction for the installation of an ~r 9roved automatic fire sprinkler system in accordance with NFPA 13 with central station monitoring This requirement is made in accordance with the California Fire Code Appendix III-A, as adopted by the Fire District Ordinances 2 Public fire hydrants located within a 500-foot radius of the proposed project may be used to provide the required fire flow subject to Fire District review and approval Private fire hydrants on adjacent property. shall not be used to provide required fire flow 3 Firewater plans are required for all projects that must extend the existing water supply to or onto the site Building permits will not be issued until firewater plans are approved. 4 On ail site plans to be submitted for review, show all fire hydrants located within 600-feet of the proposed project site FSC-3 Prerequisite for submittal of Overhead Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems Prior to submitting plans for an overhead automatic fire sprinkler system, the applicant shall submit plans, specifications and calculations for the fire sprinkler system underground supply piping Approval of the underground supply piping system must be obtained prior to submitting the overhead fire sprinkler system plans FSC-4 Requirement for Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems Rancho Cucamonga Fire District Ordinance 15, the 2001 California Fire Code and/or any other applicable standards require an approved automatic fire sprinkler system to be installed in Assembly Occupancy Buildings FSC-5 Fire Alarm System Based on the number of sprinkler heads, the sprinkler system mat be required to be monitored by a listed, central station fire alarm system FSC-6 Fire District Site Access Fire District access roadways include public roads, streets and highways, as well as private roads, streets drive aisles and/or designated fire lanes Please reference the RCFPD Fire Lanes Standard 9-7 Location of Access All portions of the structures 1St story exterior wall shall be located within 150-feet of Fire District vehicle access, measure on an approved route around the exterior of the building Landscaped areas, unpaved changes in elevation, gates and fences are deemed obstructions 2 Specifications for private Fire District access roadways per the RCFPD Standards are The minimum unobstructed width is 26-feet b The maximum inside turn radius shall be 20-feet The minimum outside turn radius shall be 46-feet d The minimum radius for cul-de-sacs is 45-feet The minimum vertical clearance is 14-feet, 6-inches At any private entry median, the minimum width of traffic lanes shall be 20-feet on each side • g The angle of departure and approach shall not exceed 9-degrees or 20 percent G202 h The maximum grade of the driving surface shall not exceed 12% i Support a minimum load of 70,000 pounds gross vehicle weight (GVW) ~ Trees and shrubs planted adfacent to the fire lane shall be kept trimmed to a minimum of 14-feet, 6- inches from the ground up Vegetation shall not be allowed to obstruct Fire Department apparatus 3 Access Doorways Approved doorways, accessible without the use of a ladder, shall be provided as follows a Access shall be provided m accordance with the 2001 California Building Code, Fire and/or any other applicable standards 4 Access Walkways Hardscaped access walkways shall be provided from the fire apparatus access road to all required building exterior openings 5 Fire Lane Identification Red curbing and/or signage shall identify the fire lanes A site plan illustrating the proposed delineation that meets the minimum Fire District standards shall be included in the architectural plans submitted to B&S for approval 6 Approved Fire Department Access• Any approved mitigation measures must be clearly noted on the site plan A copy of the approved Alternative Method application, if applicable, must be reproduced on the architectural plans submitted to B&S for plan review 7 Roof Access• There shall be a means of fire department access from the exterior walls of the buildings on to the roofs of all commeraal, industrial and multi-family residential structures with roofs less than 75' above the level of the fire access road • a This access must be reachable by either fire department ground ladders or by an aerial ladder b A minimum of one ladder point with a fixed ladder shall be provided in buildings with construction features, or high parapets that inhibit roof access c The number of ladder points may be required to be increased, depending on the building size and configuration d Regardless of the parapet height or construction features the approved ladder point shall be identified in accordance to the roof access standard e Where the entire roof access is restricted by high parapet walls or other obstructions, a permanently mounted access ladder is required f Multiple access ladders may be required for larger buildings g Ladder construction must be in accordance with the RCFPD Roof Access Standard 9-9 Appendix A and drawings 9-9a and 9-9b h A site plan showing the locations of the roof ladder shall be submitted during plan check Ladder points shall face a fire access roadway(s) FSC-10 Occupancy and Hazard Control Permits •sted are those Fire Code permits commonly assoaated with the business operations and/or building construction Plan check submittal is required with the permit application for approval of the permit, field inspection is required prior to permit issuance General Use Permit shall be required for any activity or operation not specifically described below, which in the judgment of the Fire Chief is likely to produce conditions that may be hazardous to life or property G-21 3 • Compressed Gases • Public Assembly • Tents, Canopies and/or Air Supported Structures • Liquefied Petroleum Gases FSC-12 Hazardous Materials - Submittal to Fire Construction Services Plans shall be submitted and approved prior to construction of buildings and/or the installation of equipment designed to store, use or dispense hazardous materials in accordance with the 2001 California Building, Fire, Mechanical, Plumbing, Electrical Codes, RCFPD Ordinances FD15 and FD39 and other implemented and/or adopted standards FSC-13 Alternate Method Application Fire Construction Services staff and the Fire Marshal wall review all requests for alternate method, when submitted The request must be submitted on the Fire District "Application for Alternate Method" form along with supporting documents and payment of the $92 review fee Chronological Summary of RCFPD Standard Conditions PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS -Please complete the following prior to the issuance of any building permits Private Water Supply (Fire) Systems The applicant shall submit construction plans, specifications, flow test data and calculations for the private water main system for review and approval by the Fire District Plans and installation shall comply with Fire District Standards Approval of the on-site (private) • fire underground and water plans is required prior to any building permit issuance for any structure on the site Private on-site combination domestic and fire supply system must be designed in accordance with RCFPD Standards # 9-4, #10-2 and #10-4 The Building & Safety Division and Fire Construction Services will perform plan checks and inspections All private on-site fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable prior to delivering any combustible framing materials to the site Fire construction Services will inspect the installation, witness hydrant flushing and grant a clearance before lumber is dropped 2 Public Water Supply (Domestic/Fire) Systems The applicant shall submit a plan showing the locations of all new public fire hydrants for the review and approval by the Fire District and CCWD On the plan, show all existing fire hydrants within a 600-foot radius of the project Please reference the RCFPD Water Plan Submittal Procedure Standard 9-8 All required public fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable prior to delivering any combustible framing materials to the site CCWD personnel shall inspect the installation and witness the hydrant flushing Fire Construction Services shall inspect the site after acceptance of the public water system by CCWD Fire Construction Services must grant a clearance before lumber is dropped 3 Construction Access The access roads must be paved m accordance with all the requirements of the RCFPD Fire Lane Standard #9-7 All temporary utilities over access roads must be installed at least 14' 6" above the finished surface of the road 4 Fire Flow A current fire flow letter from CCWD must be received The applicant is responsible for • obtaining the fire flow information from CCWD and submitting the letter to Fire Construction Services G224 PRIOR TO THE RELEASE OF TEMPORARY POWER The building construction must be substantially completed in accordance with Fire Construction Services' Temporary Power Release Checklist and Procedures" PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY OR FINAL INSPECTION -Please complete the following 1 Hydrant Markers All fire hydrants shall have a blue reflective pavement marker indicating the fire hydrant location on the street or driveway in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Standard Plan 134, "Installation of Reflective Hydrant Markers" On private property, the markers shall be installed at the centerline of the fire access road, at each hydrant location 2 Private Fire Hydrants For the purpose of final acceptance, a licensed sprinkler contractor, in the presence of Fire Construction Services, shall conduct a test of the most hydraulically remote on-site fire hydrants The underground fire line contractor, developer and/or owner are responsible for hiring the company to perform the test A final test report shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services verifying the fire flow available The fire flow available must meet or exceed the required fire flow in accordance with the California Fire Code 3 Fire Sprinkler System Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler system(s) shall be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services 4 Fire Sprinkler Monitoring Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler monitoring system must be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services The fire sprinkler monitoring system shall be installed, tested and operational immediately following the completion of the fire sprinkler system (subject to the release of power) 5 Fire Suppression Systems and/or other special hazard protection systems shall be inspected, tested • and accepted by Fire Construction Services before occupancy is granted and/or equipment is placed in service 6 Fire Alarm System Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire alarm system shall be installed, inspected, tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services 7 Access Control Gates Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, vehicular gates must be inspected, tested and accepted in accordance with RCFPD Standards #9-1 or #9-2 by Fire Construction Services 8 Fire Access Roadways Prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, the fire access roadways must be installed m accordance with the approved plans and acceptable to Fire Construction Services The CC&R's, the reciprocal agreement and/or other approved documents shall be recorded and contain an approved fire access roadway map with provisions that prohibit parking, specify the method of enforcement and identifies who is responsible for the required annual inspections and the maintenance of all required fire access roadways 9 Address Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, commercial/industrial and multi-family buildings shall post the address with minimum 8-inch numbers on contrasting background, visible from the street and electrically illuminated during periods of darkness When the building setback exceeds 200 feet from the public street, an additional non-illuminated 6-inch minimum number address shall be provided at the property entrance Larger address numbers will be required on buildings located on wide streets or built with large setbacks in multi-tenant commeraal and industrial buildings The suite • designation numbers and/or letters shall be provided on the front and back of all suites 10 Hazardous Materials Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the applicant must demonstrate (in writing from the County) that the facility has met or is meeting the Risk Management Plan (RMP) or Business Emergency/Contingency Plan with the San Bernardino County Fire Department, G 23 5 Hazardous Materials/Emergency Response and Enforcement Division The applicant must also obtain inspection and acceptance by Fire Construction Services 11 Confidential Business Occupancy Information The applicant shall complete the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District "Confidential Business Occupancy Information" form This form provides contact information. for Fire District use m the event of an emergency at the subject building or property This form must be presented to the Fire Construction Services Inspector 12 Mapping Site Plan Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, a 8 ~/z" x 11 " or 11 " x 17" site plan of the site m accordance with RCFPD Standard #13-1 shall be revised by the applicant to reflect the actual location of all devices and building features as required in the standard The site plan must be reviewed and accepted by the Fire Inspector • G 24 6 -~ " ~~ • ~1~~~ ~ ~~ _ k~s~ ~~ T H E C I T Y O F RANCHO C U C A M O N G A St~f f Report DATE June 13, 2007 TO Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM James R Troyer, Planning Director BY Michael Diaz, Senior Planner SUBJECT MODIFICATION OF TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM17797 - RC HYSSOP, LLC - A request to subdivide 2 8 acres of land containing one building into 5 tenant spaces to create industrial condominiums located at 9272 Hyssop Drive in the Industrial District (Subarea 14) APN 0229-283-12 This project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) • pursuant to Section 15315 Minor Land Divisions This action is a modification of Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM17797 which was previously approved for 4 tenant condominium spaces BACKGROUND On June 14, 2006, the Planning Commission approved Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM17797 to divide an existing industrial building at the above address into 4 separate industrial condominium units Although the tentative map approval was for 4 condominium units, the applicant is requesting a modification to that approval in order to create a fifth space to accommodate an existing telecommunications facility on the site No changes to the project site/building have occurred since the tentative map was approved in 2006, and none are proposed Section 17 30 C 3 of the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code exempts condominium lots from the required minimum parcel size and dimension requirements PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION The proposed modification to the Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM17797 is to create a total of 5 industrial condominium spaces at the above location The site is 2 8 acres in size and is developed with a single industrial building, 88 on-site parking spaces, and a wireless telecommunications tower The actual condominium units (5) will be located in the existing building The proposed fifth unit will be carved out of Unit D and is designed to specifically accommodate the existing wireless telecommunications facility on the site that was approved in 1991 The wireless facility consists of a freestanding cell tower on the south side of the building • and associated equipment within the mezzanine level of Unit D Access to Unit E will be from the main entry on the west side of the building of Unit D ITEM H PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTPM17797MOD - RC HYSSOP, LLC June 13, 2007 Page 2 The proposed condominium units are designated and sized as described in the following table - .. .. Unit Size Unit A 11,648 s uare feet'" Unit B 13,740 s uare feet"` Unit C 13266 s uare feet* Unit D 10,799 s uare feet"` Unit E (Unit E space is in mezzanine area of Unit D) 722 Square feet (582 square feet in mezzanine /140 square feet in stairwell Total 49, 573 s uare feet *includes mezzanine areas A Surroundmg Land Use and Zonmg Designation North - Industrial Warehouse, General Industrial (Subareat4) South - Industrial Warehouse, General Industrial (Subareal4) East - Vacant, General Industrial (Subareal4) West - I-15 Freeway, General Industrial (Subareal4) B General Plan Land Use Desianation Project Site - General Industrial North - Generallndustrial South - Generallndustrial East - Generallndustrial West - Generallndustr~ai C Site Characteristics The site is currently developed with one industrial building approximately 49,573 square feet in size and divided into four lease spaces consisting of primarily warehouse space and small office areas The building was built in 1984 with 88 on-site parking spaces and landscaping Currently, the building is vacant, except for the unmanned wireless telecommunications faality There are four access doors for the separate office suites ANALYSIS A General The applicant proposes to revise their map approval to subdivide the existing building into 5 tenant spaces instead of 4 as previously approved The building and site will be maintained by an Owner's Association Approval of a modified Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM17797 will not cause or require any changes to the site layout or the size of the existing building Shared access, parking, and maintenance easements will be conditions of approval • • B Environmental Assessment The Planning Department staff has determined that the • project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines The project qualifies under as a H-2 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTPM17797MOD - RC HYSSOP, LLC • June 13, 2007 Page 3 Class 15315 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15315, Minor Land Divisions, because it is the division of an industrial building for 5 condominium spaces, and there is no substantial evidence that the project may have a significant effect on the environment CORRESPONDENCE This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 660-foot radius of the project site RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of modified Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM17797 through the adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval with Conditions Respectfully submitted, R. Ja s R Troyer, AICP Planning Director JT MD/ge • Attachments Exhibit A -Site Plan Exhibit B -Tentative Parcel Map SUBTT17797 Draft Resolution of Approval for Modified Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM17797 • H-3 \~,~ ~~ ~~ ~^y ~5 E ~ z 0 LL U LL W Q ~ ~ ~ ~ W Z ~ O Q z n- Z lY1 Q V Z~ Q OO ~ ~ Q w zZ aOQ f- ~ U O 2 Z l.L U W H Z ~ ~ _6@tl~6 gS~ I ~g~ F~ ~~pi ppc a ~g bye ~~ ~~~ ggg~ ~ZQ &~ H` 3"d dd ~ ~2 ~~ 6 ~ ~6 ~ ~g ~~ YY ~ € d 6 d C ~k B gk e 5 g ~ ~ ~ 5 ~~ z ~~ ` % A o ~9~€ ~~~€ ~ ~~ ~~ ~r° ~~'€~~ ~ a~ ~~ ~g ~S ee ~~ ~ ~ ~_ ~~~~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~ 6 g ~ 3 e @ ~ e! ~$~ 5ggg~g "~ @@Q i ~~ tlg yn of ~ ~~' ig 3 R~~ n ~ ?ee `~ `fe ~ `• ~~f p ~ 2 ~~~GGa ~ ~I~ ~ ~~~ ~ 3~ ~ ~ ~~ Keg ~~~ ~~~~ ~~ ~~ p~~ ~~e ~e ~ °~ l e ~ E ~e€~ ~ ae~ ~E a ~s ~ ~~ °~ ~ o ~a ~~9 6~ ~ e y p ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~~~ ~~~ 9~@~ 9 ~~ ~g~ &~~ a ~~ ~ ~. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ a ~~Y ~ a d ~' ~ x'x y ~~ ~ il~ ~~+~ pyy~yye p a e y 9 ~ ~~ ~ ~~ tl ~~ 4 ~ ~` k9~ R - _ ~ , - H ~~ C ., r ~~ t:~, c e ~s ~~ - ~ -_ - E_i ' '-- JII ~ Irc ~r, ~_ ~ ~ ~,- ~ M -i n e ~, d~ _ a a . -- ,.., _ ~I~a.- n t- Z U W z a ~ a ~o$ w wdU v ~O] U a ~ ~xx F O U Z Z F W Q w Y ~ ~~~r~;~ ~H~~~.~ ~ _ _ _ ~ -D vM33aa ~iav1w07 ~ g---SC-3IVISLt3INl - "°r-" s k -- --- _ -- '--- _ _ a ~ ~ # - - - - - - - - - - €~3~`1 ~6... R `~ ... .n ~&... a ~E ~$@$ F ~~@~ ::ccc ~ « cc ~a @~~~ aa~H ~ ;sy~ ~ ~aa~a a H g~~~ ~~tv~~ ~~~~ @`~ E @[ a ~~~ @ ~d ..~ W ~~.sae g~g~ `~ q H~ @~~~ qq iF ~ a n ` ` a ,€e a ee:~ e m . i ~ ~ ~ 5 ~ ~ ~~ ~€ a ~ G4 F g 2 6~ ~pa ~ ~§ 9~ ~~ ~~~ ~ ~ ee ~Y a E a 8~e~ e eB~~~ " { ~~ ., -- -, ~ _z,. _ Y ~ ~,_"__ ~~ 6 '~ • • • H-4 • • • C,~ 1°1 ~ ~S I Q t3 SGALE ' m<O PARCEL MAP NO. 17797 SHEET 2 OF 2 IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA BEING A SUBOINSION OF A PORTION OF THE WESTERLY ONE-HALF OF LOT B9 OF MAP OF ROCHESTER IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONCA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 9 PAGE 20 OF MAPS IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY SEC 18 T 15 R 6W S B B ad( HALL & FOREMAN, INC MICHAEL NAVARRO, P L S 7848 MARCH, 2006 FOR (4) FOUR INDUSTRIAL CONDOMINIUM UNITS LEGEMB~ () odoTES RECOIe) oAu 6th STREET PEER ~ Ti,,,'; R,~ RI DENOTES RECORD GTA PER PARCEL YAP N0. 1601D PlI.6 20.7/2h23 .~_ R2 OdOlES RECORD DATA PER PARCEL YAP NO 7319 P.Y,B 67/20-25 I AS DENOTES REC01e0 DATA PQ RECORD Of SURKY 39/19 FD BRA33 pSC YONL4ENT PER Y DENOTES YEA3lA® DISTANCE f271TERLNE ^e1TERSFCRd1 OF 6N STREET ANO NYSSOP OWVE. al YONWdT NOTES ,e • kidGTES YPIWdT RTUIm AS NOTED ~ ~~~.r~-~,' ~. ~" ~I N iA LkTAG RCE 1M31 Y~ ED 1'1P RQ b~I DN 70P Di RAIL, N 16131 PER R1 33' >Y lEU OF 1 I P PERM SOIITN LIME PARCEL S PER R1 N6932 21'E J99 93' YtlG7 Ne9b2'21'E Je695 Ytli3 ~ SNAIL t TN uoo NOR1N LRIE aF LOT e9 YB 9/20, PER R1 SY I SS } >~ 3 Ida w ~~ ~ 'V~ o ~ o: o: ~ ~ o ~ ,= r o ~ ~ PARCEL 1 ~ 0 8 a rn e I ~ 8 w ~ ~n ~ I ~ ~ ~ eP~uw o~R oluo+sa~s SOUTHEIW CAl1FOR111A ~ EDLSON w9uc uTwn f m y, Ew7ddr PER wsr 11 N No eh1ee11e ox ~ ~ S I I~,y-J 13R EASddT f011 Z Z wNRPOSES~ IORER _ r -- n , ~ 1 _ ___ 1 I.00' _-___C~Ic BO'DO_~~_______________________' M 11P LS IISZ DY ISFI OIORE55/EGRESS 20FT NON BuSDABIE I S Se9bY09 W 0.11 EASddT PER INST 10R NATER RPE UNE FASddT AREA PER IN3i N0. ]S 73 NE1D FDR SOUTH ERIE NO es-a21e3 aR. PER INST ND e1-07D149 OR e3-wx1a3 aR. OF LOT e9 PER RJ - - - - - r F9 1~P ND TAO, ____________ _____________ __ ______________ NO REF ACCEPTED 3100 AS 1'IP LS 1693 I NB93T'09 E 37185 Y6R3 I I 2T 2T PER R2 I I Neob2'ov E Iot e6 . I 2e I I ~I/2e 28E ~NORFSS~CRE55 ~ j ~q(~~ 1qT .~ mE SFwIA~EP I~ ~ I ETS NO 65-W2163 OA yN__~~ VM P`~ N0. e5-0{2165 OR. I Yl~p Ma',T/ r~~ FD YP LS 1693 V ~ PTI 1'P NO TAC, ll~~'''' ~ 6 PER ~ AT C/L B G PER R7 1X~ ti Ll_s aN ARE BASED ON THE fZNTERIINE OF HYSSOP DRIVE AS YEY 79/19 BEING N0071 ODE E~~~T OETA~I H-5 • RESOLUTION NO 07-33 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A MODIFICATION TO TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM17797, FOR A SUBDIVISION OF AN EXISTING DEVELOPED PARCEL OF 2 8 ACRES INTO 5 INDUSTRIAL CONDOMINIUM UNITS, IN THE GENERAL INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT, (SUBAREA 14), LOCATED AT 9272 HYSSOP DRIVE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN 0229-283-12 A Recitals 1 R C Hyssop, LLC, filed an application to modify the Planning Commission's approval of Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM17797, as described in the title of this Resolution Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject request to modify Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM17797 shall be referred to as "the application " 2 On June 14, 2006, the Planning Commission passed Resolution 06-53 to approve Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM17797, allowing the creation 4 separate industrial condominiums and common area at the above location 3 On the 9th day of May 2007, the applicant filed an application to modify the previously approved tentative parcel map to allow the creation of 5 industrial condominiums instead of 4 • 4 On June 13, 2007, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date 5 All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred B Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows 1 This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on June 13, 2007, including written and oral staff reports and public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows a The application applies to a parcel located in the General industrial District, Subareal4, at 9272 Hyssop Drive, with an east to west dimension of about 367 feet and a north to south dimension of about 330 feet, and b The application proposes the modification of the previously approved parcel map to subdivide one parcel into 5 instead of 4 industrial condominium units, ranging in floor area from 722 square feet to 13,140 square feet, and • c The proposed modification to Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM17797 does not affect the plotting of the buildings, the distribution or number of parking stalls for each building, or the architecture of the buildings, and H-6 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 07-33 SUBTPM17797 MODIFICATION - R C HYSSOP, LLC June 13, 2007 Page 2 d The property to the north of the subject site is developed as a warehouse, the property to the south is a developed as a warehouse, the property to the west is the I-15 Freeway, and the property to the east is vacant, and e Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM17797, togetherwith the recommended Conditions of Approval, meets the development standards for the City of Rancho Cucamonga 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows a Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM17797, as modified with this action, is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable specific plans, and b The design or improvements of Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM17797, as modified with this action, is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable specific plans, and c The site is physically suitable for the type of parcel map proposed, and • d The design of the subdivision will not cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable inJury to humans and wildlife or their habitat, and e Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM17797, as modified with this action, will not cause • serious public health problems, and f The design of Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM17797, as modified with this action, will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision 4 The Planning Department Staff has determined that the project is statutorily exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines The protect qualifies under Section 15315 of CEQA of the State CEQA Guidelines for Minor Land Divisions because the application contemplates a subdivision for one common lot The Planning Commission has reviewed the Planning Department's determination of exemption, and based on its own independent judgment, concurs in the staff's determination of exemption Planning Department 1) Shared access, parking, and maintenance shall be incorporated m the protect Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) Engineering Department 1) Comply with all conditions of approval for the original parcel map as indicated on Planning Commission Resolution No 06-53 • H-7 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 07-33 SUBTPM17797 MODIFICATION - R C HYSSOP, LLC • June 13, 2007 Page 3 5 The Secretary to this Commission shall certify the adoption of this Resolution APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 13TH DAY OF JUNE 2007 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY Pam Stewart, Chairman ATTEST James R Troyer, AICP, Secretary I, James R Troyer, AICP, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 13th day of June 2007, by the following vote-to-wit • AYES COMMISSIONERS NOES COMMISSIONERS ABSENT COMMISSIONERS • H-8 F` rl~ ~~~~ `~ •~, r Y`~~ ~~- U~_:~ _. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: SUBTPM17797 SUBJECT TENATIVE PARCEL MAP APPLICANT R C HYSSOP. LLC LOCATION 9272 HYSSOP - APN 0229-283-12 ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: ~. General Requirements The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, Its agents, officers, or employees, because of the Issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval The appllcant shall reimburse the Clty, Its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, Its agents, officers, or employees maybe required by a court to pay as a result of such action The City may, at Its sole discretion, participate at Its own expense in the defense of any such actlon but such participation shall not relieve appllcant of his obligations under this condition B. Time Limits This tentative parcel map shall expire, unless extended by the Planning Commission, unless a complete final map is filed with the City Engineer within 3 years from the date of the approval C. Site Development The Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) and Articles of Incorporation of the Homeowners' Association are subject to the approval of the Planning and Engineering Departments and the City Attorney They shall be recorded concurrently with the Final Map or prior to the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first A recorded copy shall be provided to the City Engineer The Homeowners' Association shall submit to the Planning Department a list of the name and address of their officers on or before January 1 of each and every year and whenever said information changes SC-1-05 Completion Date -~-~- -~-~- -~-~. I \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2007 Res & Stf Rpt\SUBTPM17797StdCond 6-14 doc H-9 Protect No SUBTPM17797 Completion Date APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS . NOTE ANY REVISIONS MAY VOID THESE REQUIREMENTS AND NECESSITATE ADDITIONAL REVIEW(S) SEE ATTACHED. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS• NO COMMENTS. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE POLICE DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2800, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS NO COMMENTS. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DEPARTMENT, FIRE PROTECTION PLANNING SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: SEE ATTACHED. • 2 I \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2007 Res & Stf Rpt\SUBTPM17797StdCond 6-13 doc H10 ;~F ° Y Rancho Cucamonga Community .,' _~'~~~ Development ~f, Y ~, Building & Safety COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL STANDARD CONDITIONS May 30, 2007 Rancho Cucamonga Hyssop, LLC 9272 Hyssop Parcel Map for Condominium purpose - 5 units SUBTPM17797Mod The proposed parcel map for condominium purposes has been evaluated by Building & Safety It has been determined that certain Rancho Cucamonga Development Code issues must be addressed by the applicant in the resubmittal The code sections that relate to the outstanding issues have been reproduced m this document verbatim from the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code When you are ready to submit or if you have any questions about these comments, please call Moises Eskenazi at (909) 477-2710 ext 4209 The outstanding issues must be addressed by the applicant and submitted to Building & Safety for review If the • submittal is acceptable, Building & Safety will deem the parcel map application complete 17 22 030 Application Information requirement G A copy of the proposed declaration of CC and Rs which will apply and which shall include an agreement for common area maintenance, including facilities and landscaping, together with an estimate of the initial assessment fees anticipated for such maintenance, a description of a provision for maintenance of vehicular access areas within a project, and an indication of appropriate responsibilities for maintenance of ail utility lines and services for each unit, and H A physical elements report, which shall include but not be limited to A report detailing the condition and estimating the remaining useful life of each element of the project proposed for conversion roofs, foundations, exterior paint, paved surfaces, mechanical systems, electrical systems, plumbing systems including sewage systems swimming pools sprinkler systems for landscaping, utility delivery systems, central or community heating and air-conditioning systems, fire protection systems including automatic sprinkler system, alarm systems, or standpipe systems, and structural elements Such report shall be prepared by an appropriately licensed contractor or architect or by a registered civil engineer other than the owner For any element whose useful life is less than five years, a replacement cost estimate shall be provided, and, 2 A structural pest control report Such report shall be prepared by a licensed • structural pest control operator pursuant to Section 8516 of the Business and Professions Code, and Page 1 of 5 H11 3 A building history report including the following • a The date of construction of all elements of the project, and b A statement of the mayor uses of said project since construction, and c The date and description of each mayor repair or renovation of any structure or structural element since the date of construction For the purposes of this subsection a "mayor repair" shall mean any repair for which an expenditure of more than one thousand dollars ($1000) was made, and, d Statement regarding current ownership of all improvements and underlying land, and e Failure to provide information required by Subsections a through d in this section shall be accompanied by an affidavit, given under penalty of penury, setting forth reasonable efforts undertaken to discover such information and reason why the information cannot be obtained 17 22 040 Property development standards. B Application Requirements The applicant shall provide the aty with a tentative subdivision map in conformance with the State Subdivision Map Act and local ordinance and a development plan of the project including, but not limited to 1 Dimensions and location of each building or unit and the location of all fences or • walls, and 2 Building elevations indicating the type of construction material existing and proposed, 3 Typical floor plans of existing units with square footages of unit indicated and the number of units per plan, 4 Location of common area and amenities existing or proposed, 5 Location and dimensions of parking garage, carport, parking area, access ways, and any other on-site area reserved for vehicular use, 6 Location of areas for exterior storage space for individual occupants, and 7 Landscape plan per city standards, which specifies proposed trees, shrubs, plants, and ground cover, and indicates existing landscape massing Species, quantity, and sizes shall be indicated for proposed landscaping only, and, 8 Evidence that a notice of intent to convert shall be delivered to each existing tenant's dwelling unit The form of the notice shall be as approved by the Community Development Department and shall contain not less than the following a Name and address of current owner, and, b Name and address of the proposed sub divider, and, • Page 2 of 5 H12 • c Approximate date on which the tentative map is proposed to be filed, and d Tenant's nght to purchase, and, e Tenant's nght of notification to vacate, and, f Tenant's right of termination of lease, and, g Provision for special cases, and, h Provision of moving expenses, and, Tenant's riclht to purchase As provided m Government Code Section 66427 1(b), any present tenant or tenants of any unit shall be given a nontransferable nght of first refusal to purchase the unit occupied at a pace no greater than the price offered to the general public The right of first refusal shall extend for at least 60 days from the date of issuance of the subdivision public report or commencement of sales, whichever date is later, and, ~ Vacation of units Each non purchasing tenant, not in default under the obligations of the rental agreement or lease under which he occupies his unit, shall not less than 120 days from the date of receipt of notification from the owner of his intent to convert or from the filing date of the final subdivision map, whichever date is later, to find substitute housing and to relocate, and, • k Other information as may be deemed necessary by the Community Development Department 9 Any other information that the Director of Community Development deems necessary to determined whether the proposed project is consistent with this chapter NOTE. Any revisions may void these requirements and necessitate additional review A New Structures 1 Provide compliance with the California Building Code (CBC) for property line clearances considering use, area, and fire-resistive construction 2 The project shall be designed to comply with the 2001 California Building Codes (CBC), the California Fire Code and with RCFPD Ordinances 15 & 39 3 Provide compliance with the California Building Code for required occupancy separations 4 Provide draft stops in attic areas, not exceed 3,000 square feet, m accordance with CBC Section 1505 5 Exterior walls shall be constructed of the required fire rating in accordance with CBC Table 5-A • 6 Openings in exterior walls shall be protected m accordance with CBC Table 5-A Page 3 of 5 H13 7 Provide the required restroom facilities per the CBC Appendix chapter 29 • 8 All exit components must comply with the requirements of CBC Chapter 10 (ad~oming rooms, rated corridors, door swings, separation of exits, etc ) B 9 At the time of tenant improvement plan check submittal (for construction) additional requirements may be required 10 Clearly indicate on the plans compliance with ADA requirements for the disabled 11 A registered architect must sign and stamp the plans General Requirements 1 Submit five conceptual sets of plans including the following a Site/Plot Plan b Floor Plan c Foundation Plan d Ceiling, Floor, and Roof Framing Plan e Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of main switch, number • and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams f Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams, water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning g Planning Division Tracking Number (i e , SUBTPM17797 etc) must be clearly noted on the Title Sheet of the plans h Separate permits are required for fencing and/or walls 2 Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a soils report Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are required pnor to plan check submittal 3 Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers' Compensation coverage to the City prior to permit issuance 4 Business shall not open for operation pnor to posting the Certificate of Occupancy issued by the Building and Safety Division C Site Development 1 Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction All plans • shall be marked with the project file number (i e , SUBTPM17797 etc) The Page 4 of 5 H14 . applicant shall comply with the latest adopted California Codes, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application Contact the Building and Safety Division for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts 2 Prior to issuance of building permits for a new commercial or industrial development protect or mayor addition, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate Such fees may include, but are not limited to City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Check Fees, and School Fees Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Building and Safety Division pnor to permit issuance 3 The Building and Safety Official shall provide the street addresses after tract/parcel map recordation and pnor to issuance of building permits 4 Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m Monday through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays 5 Construct trash enclosure(s) per City Standard (available at the Planning Division's public counter) D Grading 1 Grading of the subJect property shall be in accordance with California Building Code, • City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices The final Grading Plan shall be m substantial conformance with the approved Grading Pian 2 A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work 3 A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer or Geologist and submitted at the time of application for grading plan check 4 At the time of tenant improvement plan check submittal (for construction) additional requirements may be required 5 The final Grading Plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official pnor to the issuance of building permits 6 A separate grading plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for existing buiid~ngs where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill The Grading Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and signed by a California registered Civil Engineer Note on title sheet that tenant improvement plans must be submitted for plan check and be approved prior to construction The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted California Codes, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit • application Contact the Building and Safety Division if you have any questions about the procedure at 909-477-2710 Page 5 of 5 H15 -~~ ~ i Rancho Cucamonga dire Protection ~~o, ~ ~ District Fire Construction Services STANDARD CONDITIONS May 30, 2007 Rancho Cucamonga Hyssop, LLC 9272 Hyssop Parcel Map for Condominium purpose - 5 units SUBTPM17797 Mod THE FOLLOWING STANDARD CONDITIONS APPLY TO THIS PROJECT The RCFPD Procedures 8~ Standards which are referenced in this document can be access on the web at http //www ci rancho-cucamonpa ca us/fire/index htm under the Fire Safety Division & Fire Construction Services section Search by article, the preceding number of the standard refers to the article Chose the appropriate article number then a drop down menu will appear, select the corresponding standard FSC-1 Private Water Supply 1 The private water supply must be maintained by the owners association as it was originally approved • FSC-5 Fire Alarm System & Automatic Fire Sprinkler System The fire sprinkler system's riser and the fire alarm panel must be accessible from outside the building by all tenants Please provide a riser room with a 3'0"x6'8" exterior door for access into the riser and alarm room FSC-6 Fire District Site Access Shall be maintained as approved Prior to any alteration to the approved site access RCFPD review is required Fire District access roadways include public roads, streets and highways, as well as private roads, streets drive aisles and/or designated fire lanes Please reference the RCFPD Fire Department Access Roadways Std #9-7 Location of Access All portions of the structures 1St story exterior wall shall be located within 150-feet of Fire District vehicle access, measure on an approved route around the exterior of the building Landscaped areas, unpaved changes in elevation, gates and fences are deemed obstructions 2 Specifications for private Fire District access roadways per the RCFPD Standards are. a The minimum unobstructed width is 26-feet b The maximum inside turn radius shall be 24-feet • c The minimum outside turn radius shall be 50-feet H16 d The minimum radius for cul-de-sacs is 45-feet • e The minimum vertical clearance is 14-feet, 6-inches f At any private entry median, the minimum width of traffic lanes shall be 20-feet on each side g The angle of departure and approach shall not exceed 9-degrees or 20 percent h The maximum grade of the driving surface shall not exceed 12% Support a minimum load of 70,000 pounds gross vehicle weight (GVW) Trees and shrubs planted adjacent to the fire lane shall be kept trimmed to a minimum of 14-feet, 6-inches from the ground up Vegetation shall not be allowed to obstruct Fire Department apparatus 3 Access Doorways Approved doorways, accessible without the use of a ladder, shall be provided as follows a In buildings without high-piled storage, access shall be provided in accordance with the 2001 California Budding Code, Fire and/or any other applicable standards b In buildings with high-piled storage access doors shall be provided m each 100 lineal feet or mayor fraction thereof, of the exterior wall that faces the required access roadways When railways are installed provisions shall be made to maintain Fire District access to all required openings • 4 Access Walkways Hardscaped access walkways shall be provided from the fire apparatus access road to all required building exterior openings 5 Commercial/Industrial Gates Any gate installed across a Fire Department access road shall be in accordance with Fire District Standard #9-2 The following design requirements apply a Prior to the fabrication and installation of the gates, plans are required to be submitted to Fire Construction Services (FCS) for approval Upon the completion of the installation and before placing the gates in service, inspection and final acceptance must be requested from FCS b Gates must slide open horizontally or swing inward c Gates may be motorized or manual d When fully open, the minimum clearance dimension of drive access shall be 20 feet e Manual gates must be equipped with a RCFPD lock available at the Fire Safety Office for $20 00 f Motorized gates must open at the rate of one-foot per second g The motorized gate actuation mechanism must be equipped with a manual override • device and afail-safe or battery backup feature to open the gate or release the locking Mechanism m case of power failure or mechanical malfunction 2 H17 h Motorized gates shall be equipped with a Knox override key switch The switch must be installed outside the gate in a visible and unobstructed location i For motorized gates, a traffic loop device must be installed to allow exiting from the • complex ~ If traffic pre-emption devices (TPD) are to be installed, the device, location and operation must be approved by the Fire Chief prior to installation Bi-directional or multiple sensors may be required due to complexity of the various entry configurations 6 Fire Lane Identification Red curbing and/or signage shall identify the fire lanes A site plan illustrating the proposed delineation that meets the minimum Fire District standards shall be included m the architectural plans submitted to B&S for approval 7 Approved Fire Department Access• Any approved mitigation measures must be clearly noted on the site plan A copy of the approved Alternative Method application, if applicable, must be reproduced on the architectural plans submitted to B&S for plan review FSC-10 Occupancy and Hazard Control Permits Listed are those Fire Code permits commonly associated with the business operations and/or building construction Plan check submittal is required with the permit application for approval of the permit, field inspection is required prior to permit issuance General Use Permit shall be required for any activity or operation not specifically described below, which in the judgment of the Fire Chief is likely to produce conditions that may be hazardous to life or property • Aerosol Products Magnesium Working • • Application of Flammable Finishes Motor Vehicle Fuel-Dispensing Operation • Automobile Wrecking Yards Open Burning • Battery Systems Organic Coating • Candles and open flames in public assemblies Ovens • Cellulose Nitrate Powder Coating • Compressed Gases Public Assembly • Cryogenics Pyrotechnical Special Effects • Dry Cleaning Plants Radioactive Materials • Dust-Producing Processes and Operations Refrigeration Systems • Explosive or Blasting Agents Repair Garages • Flammable and Combustible Liquids Rubbish Handling Operations • Fruit Ripening Plants Spraying or Dipping Operations • Hazardous Materials Tents, Canopies and/or Air Supported Structures • High-Pile Combustible Storage (HPS) Tire Storage 3 H -18 • Liquefied Petroleum Gases Welding and Cutting Operations • LPG or Gas Fuel Vehicles in Assembly Buildings Wood Products/Lumber Yards FSC-11 Hazardous Materials -Submittal to the County of San Bernardino The San Bernardino County Fire Department shall review your Business Emergency/Contingency Plan for compliance with minimum standards Contact the San Bernardino County Fire, Hazardous Materials Division at (909) 387-4631 for forms and assistance The County Fire Department is the Cal/EPA Certified Unified Program Agency (CUPA) for the City of Rancho Cucamonga If the facility is a NEW business, a Certificate of Occupancy issued by Building & Safety will not be finalized until the San Bernardino County Fire Department reviews your Business Emergency/Contingency Plan California Government Code, Section 65850 2 prohibits the City from issuing a final Certificate of Occupancy unless the applicant has met or is meeting specific hazardous materials disclosure requirements A Risk Management Program (RMP) may also be required if regulation substances are to be used or stored at the new facility 2 Any business that operates on rented or leased property which is required to submit a Plan, is also required to submit a notice to the owner of the property in writing stating that the business is subject to the Business Emergency/Contingency Plan mandates and has complied with the provisions The tenant must provide a copy of the Plan to the property owner within five (5) working days, if requested by the owner FSC-12 Hazardous Materials - Submittal to Fire Construction Services • Plans shall be submitted and approved prior to construction of buildings andror the installation of equipment designed to store, use or dispense hazardous materials in accordance with the 2001 California Building, Fire, Mechanical, Plumbing, Electrical Codes, RCFPD Ordinances FD15 and FD39 and other implemented and/or adopted standards FCS-14 Map Recordation RECIPROCAL AGREEMENTS for Fire Department Emergency Access and Water Supply are required on this project The project appears to be located on a property that is being subdivided The reciprocal agreement is required to be recorded between property owners and the Fire District The recorded agreement shall include a copy of the site plan The Fire Construction Services shall approve the agreement, prior to recordation The agreement shall be recorded with the County of San Bernardino, Recorders Office Reciprocal access agreement -Please provide a permanent access agreement between the owners granting irrevocable and anon-exclusive easement, favoring the Fire District to gain access to the subject property The agreement shall include a statement that no obstruction, gate, fence, building or other structure shall be placed within the dedicated access, without Fire Department approval The agreement shall have provisions for emergency situations and the assessing of cost recovery to the property by the fire District Reciprocal water covenant -Please provide a permanent maintenance and service covenant between the owners granting an irrevocable and non-exclusive easement, favoring the Fire District for the purpose of accessing and maintaining the private water mains, valves and fire hydrants (fire protection systems facilities in general) The covenant 4 H19 shall have provisions for emergency situations and the assessing of cost recovery to the property by the fire District 2 Hydrant Markers All fire hydrants shall have a blue reflective pavement marker • indicating the fire hydrant location on the street or driveway in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Standard Plan 134, "Installation of Reflective Hydrant Markers" On private property, the markers shall be installed at the centerline of the fire access road, at each hydrant location 3 Access Control Gates vehicular gates must be inspected, tested and accepted in accordance with RCFPD Standards #9-1 or #9-2 by Fire Construction Services 4 Fire Access Roadways The fire access roadways must be maintained m accordance with the approved plans and acceptable to Fire Construction Services The CC&R's, the reciprocal agreement and/or other approved documents shall be recorded and contain an approved fire access roadway map with provisions that prohibit parking, specify the method of enforcement and identifies who is responsible for the required annual inspections and the maintenance of all required fire access roadways 5 Address. Commercial/industrial buildings shall post the address with minimum 8-inch numbers on contrasting background, visible from the street and electrically illuminated during periods of darkness When the building setback exceeds 200 feet from the public street, an additional non-illuminated 6-inch minimum number address shall be provided at the property entrance Larger address numbers will be required on buildings located on wide streets or built with large setbacks in multi-tenant commercial and industrial buildings The suite designation numbers and/or letters shall be provided on the front and back of all suites . 6 Hazardous Materials The applicant must demonstrate (m writing from the County) that the facility has met or is meeting the Risk Management Plan (RMP) or Business Emergency/Contingency Plan with the San Bernardino County Fire Department, Hazardous Materials/Emergency Response and Enforcement Division The applicant must also obtain inspection and acceptance by Fire Construction Services 7 Confidential Business Occupancy Information The applicant shall complete the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District "Confidential Business Occupancy Information" form This form provides contact information for Fire District use m the event of an emergency at the subject building or property This form must be presented to the Fire Construction Services Inspector 8 Mapping Site Plan An 8 '/2' x 11" or 11" x 17" site plan of the site in accordance with RCFPD Standard #13-1 shall be prepared by the applicant to reflect the actual location of all devices and building features as required in the standard The site plan must be reviewed and accepted by the Fire Inspector 9 Please reference the following requirements from the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code. Comply with all issues pertaining to the Life/Fire Safety of the Building and site • 5 H 20 17.22.030 Application Information requirement • G A copy of the proposed declaration of CC and Rs which will apply and which shall include an agreement for common area maintenance, including facilities and landscaping, together with an estimate of the initial assessment fees anticipated for such maintenance, a description of a provision for maintenance of vehicular access areas within a project, and an indication of appropriate responsibilities for maintenance of all utility lines and services for each unit, and H A physical elements report, which shall include but not be limited to A report detailing the condition and estimating the remaining useful life of each element of the project proposed for conversion roofs, foundations, exterior paint, paved surfaces, mechanical systems, electrical systems, plumbing systems including sewage systems swimming pools sprinkler systems for landscaping, utility delivery systems, central or community heating and air-conditioning systems, fire protection systems including automatic sprinkler system, alarm systems, or standpipe systems, and structural elements Such report shall be prepared by an appropriately licensed contractor or architect or by a registered civil engineer other than the owner For any element whose useful life is less than five years, a replacement cost estimate shall be provided, and, 2 A structural pest control report Such report shall be prepared by a licensed structural pest control operator pursuant to Section 8516 of the Business and Professions Code, and 3 A building history report including the following • a The date of construction of all elements of the project, and b A statement of the maJor uses of said project since construction, and c The date and description of each mayor repair or renovation of any structure or structural element since the date of construction For the purposes of this subsection a "mayor repair" shall mean any repair for which an expenditure of more than one thousand dollars ($1000) was made, and, d Statement regarding current ownership of all improvements and underlying land, and e Failure to provide information required by Subsections a through d in this section shall be accompanied by an affidavit, given under penalty of penury, setting forth reasonable efforts undertaken to discover such information and reason why the information cannot be obtained 17 22 040 Property development standards B Application Requirements The applicant shall provide the city with a tentative subdivision map in conformance with the State Subdivision Map Act and local ordinance and a development plan of the project including, but not limited to • 1 Dimensions and location of each building or unit and the location of all fences or walls, and 6 H21 2 Building elevations indicating the type of construction material existing and proposed, 3 Typical floor plans of existing units with square footages of unit indicated and the • number of units per plan, 4 Location of common area and amenities existing or proposed, 5 Location and dimensions of parking garage, carport, parking area, access ways, and any other on-site area reserved for vehicular use, 6 Location of areas for exterior storage space for individual occupants, and 7 Landscape plan per city standards, which specifies proposed trees, shrubs, plants, and ground cover, and indicates existing landscape massing Species, quantity, and sizes shall be indicated for proposed landscaping only, and, 8 Evidence that a notice of intent to convert shall be delivered to each existing tenant's dwelling unit The form of the notice shall be as approved by the Community Development Department and shall contain not less than the following a Name and address of current owner, and, b Name and address of the proposed sub divider, and, Approximate date on which the tentative map is proposed to be filed, and d Tenant's right to purchase, and, e Tenant's right of notification to vacate, and, • f Tenant's right of termination of lease, and, g Provision for special cases, and, h Provision of moving expenses, and, Tenant's right to purchase As provided m Government Code Section 66427 1(b), any present tenant or tenants of any unit shall be given a nontransferable right of first refusal to purchase the unit occupied at a price no greater than the price offered to the general public The right of first refusal shall extend for at least 60 days from the date of issuance of the subdivision public report or commencement of sales, whichever date is later, and, Vacation of units Each non purchasing tenant, not m default under the obligations of the rental agreement or lease under which he occupies his unit, shall not less than 120 days from the date of receipt of notification from the owner of his intent to convert or from the filing date of the final subdivision map, whichever date is later, to find substitute housing and to relocate, and, k Other information as may be deemed necessary by the Community Development Department 9 Any other information that the Director of Community Development deems necessary • to determined whether the proposed project is consistent with this chapter H 22 ~~ ' u n t+ • ~ _ "L '4l~ I ~` l- T H E C I T Y O F R~~ r-r}~~-r ~~r tin ~r-,_~,f•$' -T's"77~ Pit t~ -'.ni ~ ~r7~ _ ~'ki , a t rJa ~,.r rn ^ -,a„ i rp~ R~ r, r ~~\~~a 1,,,'~ s~ , ~. ..~ .~`,+....~» ~1"r'i~~ a1 s~. a _ L -s~_ r_.. .. 4 a ~ , i ~.~Z "W._ ~,.. '+ RANCHO C D C A M O N G A Stiff Report DATE June 13, 2007 TO Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM James R Troyer, AICP, Planning Director BY Rina Leung, Senior Planner SUBJECT UPDATE ON ISSUES REGARDING HILLSIDE COMMUNITY CHURCH in the Very Low Residential District (1 to 2 dwelling units per acre), located at the southwest corner of Haven Avenue and Vista Grove Street - APN 1074-271-01 Related files Environmental Assessment and Development Review DRC2004- 01019, Variance DRC2005-00321, Variance DRC2005-00322, Variance DRC2005-00323, Pre-Application Review DRC2004-00718, Conditional Use • Permit DRC2001-00222, Conditional Use Permit CUP96-03, Conditional Use Permit 88-38, Conditional Use Permit CUP 88-10, Conditional Use Permit CUP 82-29, Tree Removal Permit DRC2005-00382, and Development Review DRC2004-01019 PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION A Project Density Very Low Residential District (1 - 2 dwelling units per acre) B Surrounding Land Use and Zoning North -Single-Family Dwellings, Very Low Residential District (1 - 2 dwelling units per acre) South -Single-Family Dwellings, Very Low Residential District (1 - 2 dwelling units per acre) East -Single-Family Dwellings, Very Low Residential District (1 - 2 dwelling units per acre) West -Single-Family Dwellings, Very Low Residential District (1 - 2 dwelling units per acre) C General Plan Designations Project Site -Very Low Residential District (1 - 2 dwelling units per acre) North - Very Low Residential District (1 - 2 dwelling units per acre) South - Very Low Residential District (1 - 2 dwelling units per acre) East - Very Low Residential District (1 - 2 dwelling units per acre) West - Very Low Residential District (1 - 2 dwelling units per acre) D Site Characteristics The site is located at the southwest corner of Haven Avenue and Vista Grove Street and has a total area of 8 86 acres The Hillside Community Church . property is currently developed with a 7,700 square foot multi-purpose building (Family Center), modular Sunday school classrooms, Activity Pavilion, fields, and parking areas The church is in the process of constructing a new 76,019 square foot worship center and ITEM I PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT UPDATE ON ISSUES REGARDING HILLSIDE COMMUNITY CHURCH June 13, 2007 Page 2 • a parking structure that was approved by Development Review DRC2004-01019, Variance DRC2005-00321, Variance DRC2005-00322, and Variance DRC2005-00323 in July 2005 The area surrounding the church is developed with single-family residences E Past Meetings On March 28, 2007, a resident spoke dunng public comment to raise issues with the approved development at the church Planning Department staff provided a report item on the Apnl 11, 2007 Planning Commission meeting agenda for a status report of the City's efforts to address the concerns of neighbors surrounding the church The item was continued from the April 11, 2007 to the Apnl 25, 2007 Planning Commission meeting to provide adequate time for review of the issues and for the preparation of a report The following is a summary of the issues raised at the April 25, 2007 Planning Commission meeting o Noise from activities on the fields, o Construction issues, o Parking on the fields o Design of the parking structure, o Landscaping, and • o Lack of response from Hillside Community Church ANALYSIS A Status At the May 23, 2007 Planning Commission meeting, it was requested that Planning staff provide a status report on June 13, 2006 This report provides a summary of the events that have occurred since the April 25, 2007 Planning Commission meeting After the April 25, 2007 meeting, the City met with the representatives of Hillside Community Church on May 1, 2007 regarding construction matters During the May 1, 2007 meeting, the City emphasized that it is important to comply with all construction requirements and keep all impacts to a minimum Mr Joseph Feeno of Fullmer (Hillside Community Church's construction contractor) informed the City that all construction activities are in compliance with City requirements As an effort to minimize impacts to parking and noise from construction activities, Mr Feeno distributed a letter to the subcontractors and vendors requesting compliance with the construction requirements (Exhibit A) The City has been in contact (via telephone conversations and meetings) with both Tern Smith and representatives from Hillside Community Church In addition, on June 4, 2007, Terri Smith, Hillside Community Church, and City staff met to discuss the issues During the June 4, 2007 meeting, Ms Smith provided a list entitled "Changes for Hillside Community Church" (Exhibit B) and provided a verbal summary of items Hillside Community Church will evaluate and consider the items in the list I-2 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT UPDATE ON ISSUES REGARDING HILLSIDE COMMUNITY CHURCH June 13, 2007 . Page 3 The City continues to monitor the site for compliance with the Conditions of Approval and Mitigation Measures According to inspection records, there have been no issues reported at the site Representatives from the Building & Safety Department and Code Enforcement Division will be present at the June 13, 2007 Planning Commission meeting CORRESPONDENCE Since this item is not a public hearing item, a notice was not published, posted, or mailed Hillside Community Church and Tern Smith were given information regarding the meeting RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission is requested to review the staff report and accept any public testimony and provide direction to staff for action Respectfully submitted, ~' James R Troyer, AICP Planrnng Director JT RL/is • Attachments Exhibit A -May 2, 2007 letter from Mr Joseph Freeno of Fullmer Exhibit B -June 4, 2007 list provided by Ms Tern Smith, "Changes for Hillside Community Church" I-3 FULLMER Building Relationships Since 1946 License #J01814 May 3, 2007 To all Subcontractors and Vendors INDUSTRIAL AND OFFICE CONSTRUCTION 1725 South Grove Avenue, Ontario, CA 91761-4530 Phone 909-947-9467 Fax 909-923-7476 Re. Hlllside Community Church Job #1633 In a continued effort to provide the minimum impact on neighbors surrounding the Hlllside Community Church, Fuiimer Construction asks that you provide to your suppliers and comply with the following City Ordinances and Conditions of Approval • Construction or grading shall only take place between the hours of 6 30 a m and 8 00 p m on weekdays and Saturday Work anytime on Sunday or a national holiday is prohibited Warm up engines only from 6 30 a m to 7 00 a m • Haul truck deliveries shall only take place between the hours of 6 30 a m and 8 00 p m on weekdays and Saturday No deliveries will be accepted on Sunday or a national holiday (Vehicles arriving prior to 6 30 a m may not stage or wait at the project perimeter or in adjacent neighborhood) • Observe and comply with all posted offsite parking regulations Parking is allowed on the south side of Vista Grove and on the west side of Haven • All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions The construction contractors shall ensure that ali construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications Maintenance records shall be provided to the ~obsite superintendent and made available at the construction site for Clty verification • All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted In SCAQMD Rule 1113 Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high volume, low-pressure spray • All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108 • All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403 Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions on Grading Plans and initiate on-site when appropriate or as soon as feasible • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means In addition, please note and comply with the following Job site rules: • Hard hats and work boots must be worn at all times Safety harnesses, glasses, ear protection and appropriate safety equipment must be used when necessary • • • I-4 Hillside Community Church • Job #1633 Neighborhood Impact Page 2 • All trash is to be placed in waste receptacle Clean up of debris to be conducted daily by each trade for their scope of work • Loud radios, drugs, alcohol, pets and children are not permitted Thank you m advance for providing this request to your employees and vendors and joining Fullmer Construction in our endeavor to complete this project following a good neighbor policy Sincerely, FULLMER CONSTRUCTION Joseph Freeno Project Manger cc Hillside Community Church Mr John Thomas, Building & Safety Plan Check Manager Mr Trang Huynh, Building & Safety Official Mrs Rina Leung, Senior Planner • I-5 Changes for Hillside Community Church • Contact name & number for problems such as turning of equipment and lights. The youth group band plays in the temporary building on Tuesdays Wednesday & Saturday and Sunday Mornings. Need to be moved to another area away from homes. Into the main church area. No noise days 2 days a year per neighbor for grieving/funeral days. Church to be given a 24 hour notice. The CUP states the sound wall will be started As Soon As Possible. Can we get a sound wall on west side of church. When will the sound walls be installed? DATE West side of church plant large trees to block view of church . Limit times days and hours church can make noise. No outside amplified noise no camp outs. we need to close this loop hole to be fair to neighbors.Equal rights need to go to the home owners. Proposed outside noise for HCC 4:OOPM-6:OOPM Tuesday- Wednesday- Thursday HCC can make limited outside noise(see schedule) then all noise ends. Saturday no noise Sunday until 1:OOPM then no noise. Move all outdoor games off site and remove backstop & bleachers. Temporarily move backstop and bleachers up against the church away from all homes. Use wood bats only. Until new fields are acquired limit days and hours of games. Also move soccer up next to church away from all homes. Have a set date with no extensions for removal of all outdoor sporting activities. Signs posted outside to keep their voices/noise down. • Sound travels up where we are. I-6 The church need to realize that they are in a residential area and need to conform to community standards. The people who attend church there are visitors in our area and nee d to act as such. HCC attendee's need to obey the laws of our city. That means not parking in NO PARKING zone. Be considerate to the neighbors by not parking around the homes in the area. They have Chaffey to park at that was part of the deal on the CUP so they didn't have to add additional parking. The church needs to impress upon the attendee's verbally in services, with flyers, church mailers and church bulletins that they attendee's are not to park around the church in the residential areas. HCC needs parking attendant's to walk around the streets and advise attendee's not to park in these areas and put notices on cars parked in these areas. Would the church like one of the neighbors to speak to • the people of the church about the problems so they can understand our side? Compensation for neighbors for the constant dirt for over a year and the builder/church not covering or watering down the dirt as stated in CUP. we want the church to quit going to city officials to change things like the parking restrictions so they do not have to change the CUP for public review. HCC does not have a pre school or private school they are not a public park (no trespassing signs all around the church)because of not having any of the above they have no right to the use of the development code 17.02.120 #E special provisions(they are using development code in there CUP illegally) • I-7 ~~~~~ DiAnne Drachand 5009 Carriage Rd Rancho Cucamonga, Ca 91737 RC Planning Commission 10500 Civic Center Dr. Rancho Cucamonga, Ca 91730 Attention: Pam Stewart My family has lived and been active in Rancho Cucamonga for the last 26 years. I'm sure this is one story of manyi It is not remarkable, but important for our family and for a community. When my daughter was eleven years old, she was invited by a friend to play basketball at Hillside Community Church We had been attending another church. She met a host of fantastic "coaches" that shared as much about the game of life as the game of basketball (at the first game, we witnessed a kid helping up an opponent when they fell down before continuing the play). She told me afterwards that she liked it at Hillside and wanted to come to Sunday school there We wend She attended the ~urnor high group, including a hfe- changing trip to Mexico She was not able to continue youth group in high school but the values never disappeared. She was not a spiritual "star", moving on to church leadership, but she certainly is the kind of person we want to have in our community She made it though high school and graduated from USC with good character and good grades (she even interned in the RC marketing department), and now works with autistic children in L A Our community is made up of many "ordinary" people like her. It makes a huge difference to have a church family that encourages good citizenship as well as devotion to a God who loves them and is willing to empower them to serve others I also work w-th many parents of toddlers in the Mommy & Me classes through the Gty of RC One common need I see is for parents and families to be "connected" HCC provides many avenues for women and men to find that connection with others, and of course the hope that lies in God. It would be a huge disservice to our entire community to discontinue or even discourage the important activities promoted through Hillside With so many teens getting in trouble and feeling isolated or "lost", it would be a sad day indeed when the church is forced to pull out of the business of providing healthy fun and important guidance to our youth Please consider this as you weigh the complaints against Hillside's "~oyfui noise" Sincerely, CITY OF RANCHO CU~At~ONGfa :~~~! i ~' ~o~~ I~ECEI~~Ek~ - C~L~tf~I~IN~ DiAnne Drachand /'~ ~ y c~`7 Page 1 of 1 Tuncay, Barbara From dupsont@netscape net Sent Wednesday, June 20, 2007 11 18 AM To Tuncay, Barbara Subject Fwd Upward Bound Sports -----Original Message----- From dupsont@netscape net To btuncay@cityofrc coin Sent Tue, 12 Jun 2007 9 57 am To Whom rt may concern Our family has attended Hillside Community Church for four years and had all four of our boys involved with the Upward Bound Sports Program This program has fulfilled a need m our community which our boys could not have received elsewhere This unique way of guiding our children m good sportsmanship, accepting others and encouraging parents to give positive comments and praise has been wonderful for our sons Due to Upward Bound Sports, those children who may not feel comfortable participating m the city sports program have a place to try out a sport for the first hme or learn to encourage others who are playing for the first time After learning the skills taught by Upward Bound Sports, our boys now feel confident playing sports at school and after aging out of the church program, now play for the city league Upward Bound Sports does not compete with city leagues, rt enhances what is already m place for our youth Many of our top high school athletes began learning their skills through Upward Bound Sports Without the cooperation of our city, our boys will not have a place to learn the skills necessary to play high school sports This may impact the number of children involved with sports and provide less opportunity for our youth to thrive and grow m a positive environment As the parents of four athletic boys, we implore the city officials to provide a place for our sons to learn their athletic skills through Upward Bound Sports Thank you for your time and attention in this matter, The Thomas Family Check Out the new free AIM~R Mail -- 2 GB of storage and industry-leading Spam and email virus protection 7/17/2007 Page 1 of 1 Tuncay, Barbara From cobs bielby [cobs simplesolutions@verizon net] Sent Thursday, June 14, 2007 11 54 AM To Tuncay, Barbara Subject Hillside Community Church To Whom It May Concern It's is my understanding that there has been complaints against Hillside Community Church As a member of the church and a citizen of Rancho Cucamonga, I feel compelled to voice my opinion My family and I have been citizens of Rancho Cucamonga since the 1940's We have seen the city develop into the master planned community that it is today We feel blessed and honored to be apart of that growth There have been times when the changes have been challenging, such as, the development of the wash for the water run-off infrastructure that we have today With growth comes change and I feel that change is a necessary part of life Hillside Community Church has and will continue to be at the center of our lives The church gives us a sense of community in this great city We gather at the church for prayer, for guidance, for spiritual uplifting, for study, for our children, for fun We not only bring people to God, but will invite young people/children from our community to loin us when they may not have a place where they feel a sense of community In a world with much chaos, it is comforting to know that we have a place that we can go to comfort and fellowship Please don't take that away Hillside Community Church is a great church and a great asset to our community Growth & change are a necessary part of our lives As Rancho Cucamonga grows, so does our churches, our business, and our opportunities I am business owner and home owner I pay my taxes I volunteer my time in our schools I am at Hillside Community Church several times a week In my humble opinion, we need more churches in our community, as they add value to our community Thank you for your time and consideration of my thoughts Sincerely, Jacoba S Bielby Concerned Citizen, Hillside Community Member 7/17/2007 Page 1 of 1 Tuncay, Barbara From Mary Chandler [hrtdzir@hotmail com] Sent Thursday, June 14, 2007 10 54 AM To Tuncay, Barbara Subject Hillside Community Church A word of thanks and appreciation to the Planning Commission for the action taken regarding Hillside Community Church at last nights meeting I wish to express special thanks to and praise for Pam for the extremely kind and professional way she handled the meeting. Her fob is not easy and she did an excellent fob. Thank You. Mary Chandler FREE Animations for your email - by IncrediMail~ Click Here ~~~`~-. ~,,~,. 4 ~ ~ ~ r_ jv. !;y"J jl * v~ 7/17/2007 Page 1 of l Tuncay, Barbara From Mary Chandler [hrtdzir@hotmail com] Sent Thursday, June 14, 2007 10 54 AM To Tuncay, Barbara Subject Hillside Community Church A word of thanks and appreciation to the Planning Commission for the action taken regarding Hillside Community Church at last nights meeting. I wish to express special thanks to and praise for Pam for the extremely kind and professional way she handled the meeting. Her fob is not easy and she did an excellent fob. Thank You Mary Chandler FREE Ammatrons for your email - by IncrediMail~ dick Here': ,~ ,~ ~- '# r'~ r 7/17/2007 Page 1 of 1 Tuncay, Barbara From Lsrudder@aol com Sent Thursday, June 14, 2007 7 25 AM To Tuncay, Barbara Subject Thanks for professionalism To Planning Commission As a Hillside Community Church member, I attended your meeting last night I would like to thank you for the high level of professionalism of your commission and your staff I am a property owner in Rancho Cucamonga as I purchased a condo for my daughter to rent, but since I am not a voter I did not send an email to plead however I did want to send one of thanksi I thought you explained well how you could not vote from values but from facts however you valued that position enough to commit the staffs time and your staff used their excellent expertise to gather sufficient facts to come to the indisputable decision that you did I have no doubt it was the right decision to benefit, as you stated, the overall community My daughter's condo has grown m value since I purchased it and I have never regretted the decision to buy where were did but you have given me even more reason to be glad I chose your city in which to own property Thank you so much for your professionalism in your decision making process and in conducting the meeting Sandy Rudder See what's free at AOL com 7/17/2007 Page 1 of 1 Tuncay, Barbara From Nancy Osoff-Kopp [nanosoffkopp@yahoo coin] Sent Thursday, June 14, 2007 6 30 AM To Tuncay, Barbara Subject Hillside Church Program and Activities Asa person of faith and attendee at Hillside Community Church, I want to express my concern that someone would consider the church a nuisance The church's long presence at this cite and long time service to the community of RC/AL This church is an active and involved church that provides many services to the community The sports/recreational program has been m existence for a long time and keeps many kids off the streets and out of trouble In addition it envolves the parents so that they become envolved with the church and hence strengthens the family structure We reach out to single parents whose children may benefit from exposure to athletics and christam service A consideration of hmitmg that program reduces its effectiveness and restricts the service to the community The issue of parking will soon be resolved with the opening of the new parking structure at the church I am sure the planning comission will take a broad view of this complaint and recognize that one person's complaints should not impact the whole contributions made by the church and its comumty> I am sincerely yours, Nancy Osoff--Kopp &z sp, nbsp, Get the free ~'ahoo~ toolbar and rest assured with the added security of spyware protection 7/17/2007 Page 1 of 1 Tuncay, Barbara From Brianna Bathauer [surferchicbri18@yahoo coin] Sent Wednesday, June 13, 2007 10 05 PM To Tuncay, Barbara Subject Hillside Dear City Counsel, I am 17 years old and have been attending Hillside since I was four I've been a part of the sports ministry, children's ministry, Jr high ministry, and I am currently a part of the high school ministry It's been so great to have Hillside as a "safe haven" for all these years Hillside has constantly promoted a safe and excrtmg environment for children of all ages I am fully aware that these "children" may cause many problems of high noise level as all children do However, I beleive it is important to have a place where they are able to bang their friends with guaranteed excitement and fun Tonight I attended the Crty Counsel meeting The high school ministry had a planned "undergrad night" that was forced to be canceled This was a place for non-seniors to go as an alternative for parties ect Last year it was a big sucess and it was wonderful to see so many people at in a safe environment instead of doing the immoral things that most high schoolers do It was unfortunate to not have this opportunity for this year Although I was quite disapointed, as most others were, I beleive that supporting my church is the most important thing and I hope that each and every one of our supporters made an impact for the city to see how important our church really is to us Thank you for your time I hope the right decision is made Sincerely, Bnanna Bathauer Get your own web adds ess Have a HUGE year through Yahoos Small Business 7/17/2007 Page 1 of 1 Tuncay, Barbara From Ena Valiente [enavaliente@hotmail coin] Sent Wednesday, June 13, 2007 9 42 PM To Tuncay, Barbara Subject Hdiside Community Church Member I would like to express my feelings by saying that I am a resident of Alta Loma, and I'm about 1 minutes away from Hillside Community Church and totally support what Hillside is doing for the community by expanding and I certainly don't think that what Hillside is doing is nuisance Thank you, ~v~w VaZ%e,~~e~ Hoimail to ~o~ Get your Hotmail news, sports and much_mote~ 7/17/2007 Page 1 of 1 Tuncay, Barbara From Frogs1959@aol com Sent Wednesday, June 13, 2007 7 24 PM To Tuncay, Barbara Subject Hillside Community Church Please find favorably on Hillside's request for use by the youth of the church the existing fields for sports programs. We think this an important program for our children to participate in. Thank you, DeWitt Hilliker See what's free at AOL com 7/17/2007 Hillside Community Church Item Page 1 of 1 Tuncay, Barbara From Tom Nightingale@wellsfargo com Sent Wednesday, June 13, 2007 5 53 PM To Tuncay, Barbara Subject Htliside Community Church Item i am a resident and tax payer of Rancho Cucamonga and do not feel the outside activities at Hillside are a nuisnance nor should they be construed as such The activities conducted at Hillside are a benefit to the community, its families and the surrounding area Our community goes to great lengths to provide venues for sports and family activities and Hillside is such venue I know many children that have participated in programs at that location over the years and are certainly the better for having done so Restricting activities at Hillside per the requests of these people is not the right thing to do Hillside is providing a great service to our community and addressing needs not met by employers or government Additionally, the church has been in this location for many years, certainly pre-dating the time when these residences were inhabited by their current owners If they don't like the sound of children playing sports, learning and growing, perhaps they should relocate or perhaps better yet, loin in Respectfully, Tom Nightingale 6058 Vineyard Avenue Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91701 (909) 260-9250 7/17/2007 Page 1 of 1 Tuncay, Barbara From vicky Cardenas [vickyanncar@prodigy net] Sent Wednesday, June 13, 2007 5 06 PM To Tuncay, Barbara Subject Hillside stands for Community Hello my name is Vicky Cardenas I live m Alta Loma I am a voter I am a member of Hillside Community Church I have attended church all my life and have never felt the sense of community until I started to attend Hillside My spintual walk is so imprtant to me My families spmtual hfe is so important to me Hillside has provided a place were we have all have grown leaps and bounds spiritually and has brought our family closer than ever You ask how can a church do all that It does that through all the amazing mimstnes they provide for all stages and all ages of its members Sports mmistnes, womens mmisnes, youth mmistnes, singles mimstnes gnef mmistnes, worship mmistnes, and I know Iam leaving out so many more I have been married to my husband for 19 wonderful years and we have 4 amazing sons Josiah 15, Joshua 14, Jonah 10, & Jonathan 4 My sons have learned so much through Upward Bound Sports They've learned the importance of teamwork, respect, and a love for Chest We are leaders m the ~r high & high school mimstnes It's a blessing to my husband and I to be able to send our older boys to the tues & wed night youth programs I believe our childrens positive attitudes, respect for us and their community comes from their time learning about God and having positive caring mentors from their youth groups on tues & wed evenings It would be a shame to have all these wonderful and inspiring programs taken away from us and our youth Especially m a time when it isn't safe for our youth to be wondering the streets Hillside provides a safe and positive enviroment for our children to continue to learn good and Godly values so we can have responsible future citizens and voters for the city of Rancho Cucuamonga Thank You For You Time, Vicky Cardenas 7/ 17/2007 Page 1 of 1 Tuncay, Barbara From sherry day [dayshm@msn com] Sent Wednesday, June 13, 2007 5 03 PM To Tuncay, Barbara Subject Hillside Community Church Dear Community Leaders, I believe the activities provided at Hillside Community Church benefit the children in our community and should continue A concerned resident of Rancho Cucamonga, Sherry Day 7/17/2007 Page 1 of 1 Tuncay, Barbara From vicky Cardenas [vickyanncar@prodigy net] Sent Wednesday, June 13, 2007 4 33 PM To Tuncay, Barbara Subject i totally love hillside to whom this may concerns, hillside means everything to me i have been attending hillside for eight years and been m upward bound sports for seven of those years and let me tell you it was the best years of my hfe, you got to hang out with your friends, play the sport you enjoy, and learn about~esus chest at the same time and the Tuesday and Wednesday nights were also one of the greatest experiences to me i am the bassist for the humor high mmistnes and rt is great to play my bass with the worship team on those two nights i am sure you enjoy to hang out with your buddies and have a great time to us those nights and sports are the only hme for us to catch up on are buddies and i do not want you to take that away i hope you take this note into consideration thank you for your time yours truely, Joshua Cameron Cardenas p s sorry for the grammer mistakes~~ 7/17/2007 Tuncay, Barbara From mary theal [marycatherine26@earthlink net] Sent Wednesday, June 13, 2007 4 21 PM To Tuncay, Barbara Subject Our Community To our City Representatives What makes a city a desirable place to live * Safety (police, fire, lack of gangs) * Housing * Community Those would be the top responses on my list of desirable factors I have been a resident of Rancho Cucamonga since 1987 It has grown into a prosperous city which has attracted businesses and residents It is also the community where I live, work, and socialize Raising my sons in this city for the past 20 years has been a blessing We feel safe, have a beautiful home, and have enjoyed parks, sports, Quakes baseball, friends, conveniences as more shops and malls have opened, and most importantly a community church We attend Hillside Community Church We started attending this church because of its reputation in the community, it is noted for positive places for sports activities and fellowship with other Christians Children are a key to the outreach of Hillside Community Church Parents want their children in a safe environment with positive role models Hillside is the place In reality this churches outreach is beneficial to the city I would prefer to hear children playing and having fun, rather than yelling, gun shots, police sirens et cetera Hillside goes out of its way to be a good neighbor to the residents around our property The team sports on our property is similar to living next to a park, a school, or many neighborhoods in our great city where children are at play in a safe setting Thank you for your time and attention to positive aspects in our community Sincerely, Mary Catherine Theal 1 Tuncay, Barbara From Julia Aguirre [~_aguirre@charter net] Sent Wednesday, June 13, 2007 4 19 PM To Tuncay, Barbara Subject Hillside Community Church City Planners My family moved to Rancho Cucamonga 10 years ago We were looking for a church in or around the city that we could call home When we heard about Hillside Community Church's sports programs for kids, we decided to check it out I have 5 kids that have participated in their sports teams, camps, and now as teenagers to volunteer their time to help kids In fact, that was what gave one of my kids the experience to get hired by the City of Rancho Cucamonga to work in the Parks and Recreation department Please understand how important all of these programs are to kids in this area It offers kids a great chance to participate as well as to give back to the kids as they get older Many moms and dads also get involved with their kid's sports/fun by volunteering too Thank you for supporting HCC's upward bound sports in the past Please continue to allow HCC to offer this program to the community Sincerely, Julia Aguirre Page 1 of 1 Tuncay, Barbara From Annette Smith [smith4some@verizon net] Sent Wednesday, June 13, 2007 5 18 PM To Tuncay, Barbara Subject Tonight's issue regarding Hillside Community Church My family has attended Hillside Community Church for over 9 yrs and our children were involved in their sports program for several years In regards to the recent complaint made by a particular neighbor of Hillside church, I see no valid reason for the city to make any changes to the past agreement that the city of R C has with Hillside The pastor, along with its church members, have always gone above and beyond to respect the neighboring community and have done a remarkable fob of bringing a very positive sports program to a growing community It is a shame that some people feel the need to put rediculous limits on something that more commun~t~es would be thankful to have for their ch~7dren and friends My family and I respectfully ask that you let Hillside continue their efforts to bring positive programs to the community and not limit them in a way that would make it impossible to implement Thank you, Kirk and Annette Smith 7/17/2007 Page 1 of 1 Tuncay, Barbara From JUDY WALKER [~rwalk123@verizon net] Sent Wednesday, June 13, 2007 4 17 PM To Tuncay, Barbara Subject Hillside Community Church This email is to express support for the wonderful programs and activities that are sponsored by Hillside Community Church. The youth sports programs are a benefit to the entire community by giving children a place to learn athletic skills as well as moral values and positive life skills for becoming responsible adults. The Christian emphasis makes our community a much better place to live and Hillside Community Church is such an asset to Rancho Cucamonga. Every effort should be made to make sure that this organization can continue all the excellent things that make our community a better place to live! Randy and Judy Walker 7/17/2007 Page 1 of 1 Tuncay, Barbara From vicky Cardenas [vickyanncar@prodigy net] Sent Wednesday, June 13, 2007 4 13 PM To Tuncay, Barbara Subject Hillside Community Church is important to me To whom it may concern, Hillside has been a very huge and important part of my life I dust want to say I don't want the sports or extra activities to be gone I myself have been apart of the Upwardbound Sports since I was three, and it has been wonderful I have~oined the baseball program, basketball, football, soccer, and also the worship team for the Junior High and Highschool groups It has been a pleasure and honor to serve Hillside and it's citizens I also love Hillside because rt is a safe and fun place to go hang out with my fnends and to grow friendships It has also made me a better citizen to my city If the Hillside activities were to be canceled, where would the youth have a fun and safe place to bey I feel we need Hillside for the betterment of the city The building project will also expand this idea, making it a much more bigger and spacious place to have a lot more kids to become better citizens All m all I dust love Hillside Community Church and I would love to watch it grow and expand for the future and possibly my children From, Josiah Cardenas 7/17/2007 Page 1 of 1 Tuncay, Barbara From Mary Hanks [mmhanks@earthlink net] Sent Wednesday, June 13, 2007 4 05 PM To Tuncay, Barbara Subject Save Hillside Kids Hillside has literally saved my life, and plans on saving many more The church caters to children, which the majority of people appreciate It's a safe haven for children to build character through a very well-run sports program If a few neighbors don't like the sound of children laughing and playing, then I would question why they bought a house near a church They may have to move out to the desert to get away from the sound of parks and schools, also When I heard this complaint, my first reaction was to laugh out loud It quickly turned to unbelief, then pity for these people How miserable and selfish they must be I pray their hearts be softened, and they come to a realization of how ridiculous this situation has become I respectfully ask you to consider this issue carefully A few voices complaining should not alter a community, especially such a positive influence in a world where good morals and integrity are slipping quickly Please, for the good of the whole community, in which I have lived for 30 years, follow your conscience and let your heart lead you Mary Marangio-Hanks, Hillside member and Rancho Cucamonga citizen 7/17/2007 Page 1 of 1 Tuncay, Barbara From doughanks@earthlink net Sent Wednesday, June 13, 2007 3 38 PM To Tuncay, Barbara Subject Need for Hillside in the community I wish to express my concern about closing down the sports activities at Hillside Community Church I am a sixth grade teacher in Alta Loma who has several "displaced students"-- students that lust don't fit anywhere else They cannot play AYSO or travel with a softball team, they cannot play Little League because the nature of baseball at that level is now so competitive, they don't get any play time They merely warm the bench However, Hillside accepts these students openly and does three things 1 Hillside allows them to play ball-- soccer, basketball, baseball No matter what a child's skill level is, the child is included as part of the playing team 2 Hillside provides a safe environment where competition is tempered with the child's social development Anyone in education today will tell how important a child's safety is when teaching skills Kids at Hillside feel safe 3 Hillside nurtures the child by providing positive reinforcement about the child's performance after each game Even is a child is not a "star" athlete, he or she is made to feel important as a part of a team I have enough kids in my classes who struggle with their self-image and self-esteem Please do not amputate this strong, character-building organization from the great things Alta Loma has to offer southern California Doug Hanks doughanks a~earthlink net http //teacherweb com/CA/VictonaGrovesElementar~r/M_rHanks/ (School site) 7/17/2007 Tuncay, Barbara From Krishna Marshall [kgmarshall@yahoo com] Sent Wednesday, June 13, 2007 2 52 PM To Tuncay, Barbara Subject Hillside Church To whom it may concern My family and I are members of Hillside Community Church We began attending because of all of the great programs that they have available for kids we have our kids involved in the sports ministries and as a family participate in many of the family functions I am sending this email because I would like to show my support for my church but am unable to attend the city planning meeting this evening because I will be attending Rancho Cucamonga High School's graduation ceremony at the same time since I am a teacher We believe that the programs and ministries that Hillside offers are a valuable asset to the Rancho Cucamonga/Alta Loma community It would be a disservice to no longer allow our church to have our sports programs, family activates, and other functions on our church property during the week and in the evenings As members of the church, I believe we do our best to be consciencious neighbors I realize that one of our neighbors has filed a complaint and has even gone to the extreme measure of having our youth pastor arrested I pray that the city would consider the fact that the church has been in the community for over 25 years and that we have obtained permits from the city to have all of the programs that we provide Thank you for your time and careful consideration of this matter- The Marshall family Need Mail bonding Go to the Yahoos Mail Q&A for great tips from Yahoos Answers users http //answers yahoo com/dir/link=list&sid=396546091 1 Page 1 of 1 Tuncay, Barbara From rarcaro@comenca coin Sent Wednesday, June 13, 2007 2 43 PM To Tuncay, Barbara Subject Hillside Community Church Asa 14 year resident of Rancho Cucamonga Hillside Community Church has been and continues to be a very important and integral part of my family We have attended Hillside for nearly 13 years Both my children Anthony and Erica grew up in the sports programs at Hillside The community continues to benefit from the positive message Hillside sends The City has been a great proponent of Hillside since its inception I ask as a citizen of Rancho Cucamonga and a member of Hillside Community Church that you will continue your support Thanks Again, Rick Arcaro comenca Bank Vice President-Western Division 633 W 5th Street 69th Floor Los Angeles, CA 90071 (213) 486-6239 Fax (213) 486-6273 Please be aware that if you reply directly to this particular message, your reply may not be secure Do not use browser a-mail to send us communications which contain unencrypted confidential information such as passwords, account numbers or Social Security numbers If you must provide this type of information, please visit http /www comenca coin to submit a secure form using any of the "Contact Us" forms In addition, you should not send, via a-mail, any inquiry or request that may be time-sensitive If you receive this a-mail by mistake, please destroy or delete the message and advise the sender of the error by return a-mail 7/17/2007 Page 1 of 1 Tuncay, Barbara From Silva [alphab2@roadrunner coin] Sent Wednesday, June 13, 2007 2 37 PM To Tuncay, Barbara Subject Hillside Community Church To the City Planning Commission We would like to take this opportunity to express my appreciation for the positive impact Hillside Community Church has had in the community and to encourage you to allow the church to continue functioning without added limitations on its services and programs Thank you -Ted and Sandra Silva 7/17/2007 Page 1 of 1 Tuncay, Barbara From Williams, Doug [dougw@enpointe com] Sent Wednesday, June 13, 2007 2 31 PM To Tuncay, Barbara Subject Issues with CUP's Ms Tuncay I have been affiliated with Hillside Community Church for 20 years, and I am very proud of that fact HCC has been a great neighbor m the City of Rancho Cucamonga, as has been a place of worship for thousands, in the greater Inland Empire As you debate the conditional use of our facilities, please take time to understand our membership, a desire to bring a spiritual message to our community, and all of the people who have been helped, and cared for by our church family We are not a body of believers who wish confrontation, but we will stand for our beliefs, our desire to do what is right in Gods' eyes, as well as what is right for our community I am very concerned that individuals, who complain about noise and activity, are often a significant minority, and yet, have their concerns often given a bigger voice than the majority, that remain silent because of a spiritual belief which allows our creator to fight the battle I liken it to people that move next to an airport runways then complain about the noise I would ask that HCC be granted all rights and privileges for use Be it a wedding, a children's ball game, an outdoor activity or concert, or even a long sermon on a Sunday morning, Hillside Community Church is a place where God works and lives God will work this out Perhaps you will be His instrument I hope I am right My Best, 2062 ~au~uu~ 2Uacy Zi Jiea~d, (~,~f X1784 ~i0~i 23y 16.30 7/17/2007 Page 1 of 1 Tuncay, Barbara From Ken Keeney [kdkkeeney@hotmail coin] Sent Wednesday, June 13, 2007 2 18 PM To Tuncay, Barbara Subject Hillside Community Church Dear Sirs, I have been attending Hillside Community Church for the past 7 years The outreach and support of Hillside Community Church has brought many blessings I have participated m various projects that touch reach out to our community in many ways I have seen the youth of our community grow and develop with a focus and commitment to service and bettering our world and community The support of Hillside Community Church is ongoing and serves our community thru out the day and into the evening, each day of the week The restricitons being considered would severely curtail this outreach to our community and the lives that are being touched Thank you for your consideration Ken Keeney Get a prev-ew of L-~ e Earth the hottest event th-s summer - onl~on MSN 7/17/2007 Page 1 of 1 Tuncay, Barbara From Erica Hinthorne (encamarieh@sbcglobal net] Sent Wednesday, June 13, 2007 1 12 PM To Tuncay, Barbara Subject Hillside Chuch Planning Meeting tonight To Whom It May Concern This is regarding the planning commission meeting for Hillside Community Church taking place tonight Unfortunately, my husband and I will not be able to attend We wanted to let you know the activities that go on at Hillside are so important to our family We are so thankful to have a safe, clean place to take part m activities with our children There is no other place m Rancho Cucamonga that focuses so much on the family unit The activities offered through the city are either for children or for adults and are usually during working hours Hillside offers things we can all do together Thank you, Enca Hmthorne 7/17/2007 Page 1 of 1 Tuncay, Barbara From suehaston@att net Sent Wednesday, June 13, 2007 12 51 PM To Tuncay, Barbara Subject planning commission/Hillside Community Church Honorable Members of Planning Commission We're writing to let you of our support for the continuing programs at Hillside Community Church We have been a part of Hillside since its inception 29 years ago We have watched the positive influence rt has had on the community, and childrens hues m particular One has merely to walk on the campus and see the faces of the children as young as five years old involved m sports, to see the impact of such a positive program There is no yelling, except to cheer the children There are no arguments amongst parents There are no winners or losers as no score is kept Everyone is a winner at Hillside because we want to make a positive impact on the lives of these children and the community Parents write encouragement cards to other people's children and these are read m the "huddles" after the games Children feel valued and important It is all postive Over the years we have done great things for the community with hundreds of volunteers such as the Soap Box Derby held at Quake Stadium What an incredible turn out we had and what fun for families Our goal is to reach families and the community and to make a difference in their lives, and make a positive influence Our ongmal goal was to make a positive impact on families, reach the community and make Hillside a safe place for people to come worship We have not deviated from that goal and to that end, we have succeeded We boldly ask that you allow us to continue our goal In today's world, what better goal could there bey Sincerely, Harold and Sue Haston 7831 Calle Casino Rancho Cucamonga 7/17/2007 Page 1 of 1 Tuncay, Barbara From Kim Aylor [kim@theacigroup net] Sent Wednesday, June 13, 2007 12 44 PM To Tuncay, Barbara Subject Hillside Community Church Dear Planning Commission, I'm very surprised at the issue in which we are even discussing tonight at the Planning Commission Meeting Over the last 20 years all you hear on the news at night are stories about our youth getting in trouble Not dust in LA or New York but everywhere Yes here in Rancho Cucamonga as well Well Hillside Community church set out to help with this growing issue that never seems to be addressed by Cities and or anybody else Hillside 20 plus years ago with the Planning Commissions and City Councils blessing proposed a sports facility with baseball fields, soccer fields, and basketball courts And what a true blessing this turned out to be for my family My son Scott has had the opportunity to play sports and learn how to interact with other children, through all this he is now involved with sports at Los Osos High School and has been awarded the Coached award He learned his sportsmanship through the quality program provided by Hillside My wife and I have both been involved with the program and have been blessed with working with children from all walks of life Three years in a row we had mentally challenged children on our teams in soccer and basketball, this would not happen in city leagues and or any other leagues Plus my wife and I got the chance to be a family with our son, these were treasure times With such great positive outcomes from a program to thousands of children and families why would you want to do anything but encourage more of this kind of activity When today's youth are following away from strong families and into problems situations, why would you not encourage even more of this activity I'm very puzzled that one person or a couple could want to even think of slowing this kind of great support for youth Why would you as the Planning Commission even think this ways And if we are not able to do this are you cutting everybody else's activities in the community down as well Hillside Community Church has even gone out of there way to provide the City of Rancho Cucamonga places to run there preschool programs And has housed one of the biggest events Rancho Cucamonga has ever had in 1999 and 2000, The Soap Box Derby Very trouble Kim Aylor 7/17/2007 Page l of 1 Tuncay, Barbara From Brian Hoerning [brian hoerning@salemla coin] Sent Wednesday, June 13, 2007 12 39 PM To Tuncay, Barbara Subject Hillside Community Church I wanted to voice my opinion on the significance of Hillside Community Church plays in RC and the surrounding area We raised out 3 kids in Rancho Cucamonga and was attracted to the town, in part, because of Hillside Community Church -that was back in 1985 We still attend and are active m the church Our kids are all grown now and our granddaughter attends the church, has played in the kids soccer league and because of positive influences like Hillside I think she'll turn out dust fine We need all the forces for good we can find these days and Hillside Community Church is dust that Thanks, Brian Hoerning CRMC Office Phone/Fax 909-574-6641 Cell 909-997-3816 Email Brian hoerning@salemla coin 7/17/2007 Page 1 of 1 Tuncay, Barbara From Carol Hoffman [HFMN@msn coin] Sent Wednesday, June 13, 2007 11 51 AM To Tuncay, Barbara Subject Planning Commission Meeting Tonight I understand that the planning commission will be discussing the conditional use permits for Hillside Community Church at tonight's meeting (6/13/07) Although I cannot personally be there, I would like to express my opinion for your consideration My husband and I have been homeowners in Rancho Cucamonga since 1988 We are raising our thirteen year old daughter here We love being a part of this community The activities, and especially the children's programs, offered by Hillside Community Church are done in an excellent manner and benefit the entire community We wholeheartedly encourage the continuation of the sports programs on the fields of the church The family atmosphere and encouragement to the children of our community can only benefit all who live here Seeing the children growing and thriving in an organized sports program is inspiring It is reassuring that the young people of our community are learning respect for others and fair play in a caring and supervised environment It would be a shame to curtail a program that does so much good for so many We are proud to live in a city that encourages our children to be well-rounded, body, mind and spirit Please continue to support the positive impact of Hillside Community Church's programs for our community Thank you, Carol C Hoffman 5726 Showalter Ct Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91701 909-989-6262 HFMN@msn coin 7/17/2007 Tuncay, Barbara From Marycarol Hunt [MC Hunt@etiwanda k12 ca us] Sent Wednesday, June 13, 2007 10 41 AM To Tuncay, Barbara Subject Re Hillside Community Church Hello, I have lived in Rancho Cucamonga for over 20 years It has come to my attention that the subject of Hillside Community Church has come before your committee for a complaint I wanted to let you know how important I feel the activities are that are part of that church Hillside has been an important part of this city's positive influence of the children of this town Not only has the city used the campus for Playschool, but the Upward Bound Sports programs/summer workshops have been great influences My children have been a part of HCC's Upward Bound Sports program for years This program has been very positive and uplifting and has been a great self-esteem building for our children As a teacher, I believe that children need good positive role models that they can look up to and aspire to be like HCC provides this on a daily basis HCC is a safe, positive place for all children of the city can come to These programs teach good sportsmanship and allow for all children on the teams to participate by playing in the game No one sits on the bench the whole or most of the game They learn the rules of the game and the enjoyment of the game by everyone getting to play and always stress that everyone is a winner no matter what the score is People are important, not the scores This is a wonderful program and this is dust one of many HCC also provides a safe, positive, well-chaperoned mid-week activities for my Junior High and High School students This is all done in fun activities that the students need to learn positive self-esteem and life lessons Please do not stop Hillside Community Church from these much needed positive activities for our children and young adults in our community Smiles MC The contents of this e-mail message and any attachments are intended solely for the addressee The information may also be confidential and/or legally privileged This transmission is sent for the sole purpose of delivery to the intended recipient If you have received this transmission in error, any use, reproduction, or dissemination of this transmission is strictly prohibited If you are not the intended recipient, please immediately notify the sender by reply e-mail and delete this message and its attachments, if any Please note that any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of the Etiwanda School District Finally, the recipient should check this email and any attachments for the presence of viruses The Etiwanda School District accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this email E-mail is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 USC SS 2510-2521 and is legally privileged Etiwanda School District, 6061 East Ave, Etiwanda, CA 91739, www etiwanda k12 ca us ESDN20060918-1 Page 1 of 1 Tuncay, Barbara From LdJoiey@aol com Sent Wednesday, June 13, 2007 10 27 AM To Tuncay, Barbara Subject Hillside church ministires To whom this may concern, My name is Joy Allen and I attend Hillside Community Church The church is my second home where I have made many new friends and have participated in some of their activities It has greatly enriched and changed my life I was diagnosed with breast cancer 4 years ago and have been an active participant ever since I was baptized 3 years ago and that was a significant and memorable event in my life and my family as well Hillside has many out door activities for the children of this community My son played basketball for 2 seasons and enjoyed it very much The sports program is a positive based one with emphasis on self esteem and team worki~i It is doing a service to this community It keeps the kids busy and off of the streets where they may be lead in the wrong direction Please give Hillside a chance~~~ WE DO CARE ABOUT OUR CHURCH AND IT'S MINISTRIES~~i~~~~ I thank you very much for your time in reading this Joy Allen See what's free at AOL com 7/17/2007 Tuncay, Barbara From alisa@themaxwellteam com Sent Wednesday, June 13, 2007 10 20 AM To Tuncay, Barbara Dear City Council Members, My husband and I have lived in Rancho Cucamonga for 17 years We have operated our business here for the past 6 years We have attended Hillside Community Church for 5 years This church has had an enormous impact on our lives and we are looking forward to it having such an effect on our children This church is a great asset to our community and should be allowed to expand I have never known of a church expansion that did anything but enhance the community and neighborhood This is for any faith As a tax paying citizen and a proud member of this community, I would surely consider moving my family and business if one mans voice can stop any project that doesn't suit his agenda Thank you Alisa R Maxwell 7572 Plymouth Way Rancho Cuacamonga, CA 1 Tuncay, Barbara From Apnl Smith [april smith@mac com] Sent Wednesday, June 13, 2007 10 06 AM To Tuncay, Barbara Subject Hillside Community Church On behalf of Hillside Community Church, I would like to support the activities that take place on and off campus I think that the activities developed and promoted by the church have a positive impact on the community As a mother of two young children, I look forward to enrolling my sons in the Upward Bound sports program because the program helps foster spiritual and emotional well-being in children as well as helps develop physical skill I have not found another program in our community that focuses so well on raising up children who feel loved and encouraged If we want well- adjusted children to flourish in our community, then I think that it is important to allow Hillside Community Church to have the freedom to do the activities that they have already been approved to do on campus grounds Sincerely, April Smith Hillside Community Church Member (909) 948-0886 1 Page 1 of 1 Tuncay, Barbara From Jen Moore den@moorerealestategroup com] Sent Wednesday, June 13, 2007 9 45 AM To Tuncay, Barbara Subject Hillside Communtty Church To whom it may concern, As a resident and business owner of Rancho Cucamonga, I believe that the activities conducted on the field at Hillside Community Church are beneficial to the community at large and should not be restricted I know the city has the interests of the community in mind, particularly the children The activities on the campus have proven to be helpful for keeping kids focused on positive activities Our community needs more programs such as these, which help to deter kids from getting involved in negative activities such as shoplifting or destruction of properties Jennifer Moore www MooreRealEstateGroup com 909 477 2001 office 626 644 4862 mob-le 909 944 3179 fax 7/17/2007 Page 1 of 1 Tuncay, Barbara From dim fowler ~jifowler@venzon net] Sent Wednesday, June 13, 2007 9 04 AM To Tuncay, Barbara Subject Hillside Community Church Dear Planning Commission, We have lived in the Rancho area for 18 years During this time we have seen much positive growth in our city Our children, now 20, 17, and 13 years of age have grown up in this community They have had very positive experiences attending activities at Hillside Community Church Our children have a place to go where they, and their fnends are welcome and can enjoy a safe environment This church provides a large service to the community with its sports programs and other midweek activities I have watched my children grow into responsible young adults who see the importance of volunteer service and are volunteers m the Hillside programs to help other children become connected with God and the community through team work This church has been a blessing for our whole family through their sports programs, children's ministry programs, adult ministry programs, worship services, counseling services, and seminars What an asset to our community Sincerly, Jim and Marcia Fowler 7/17/2007 Page 1 of 1 Tuncay, Barbara From Debbie [debbie@empiresolutionsinc net] Sent Wednesday, June 13, 2007 9 03 AM To Tuncay, Barbara Subject Hillside Church Dear Planning Committee, I have been a member of Hillside Church for 10 years and would like to know that our family supports the growth and direction of our church and the sports ministry that we sponsor These programs, including allowing our children to have a safe place to meet during the week when they were in Junior High and High School has been a huge part of our family It would disturb me to think that others would not have a positive influence and safe place for their children to gather during the week, whether it is in the form of sports or meeting one night a week Please consider this in your deliberations and decisions on the future of Hillside Church Sincerely, Debbie Beckley 909-899-3412 7/17/2007 Page 1 of 1 Tuncay, Barbara From Jennifer DeVall [devall~ennifer@yahoo coin] Sent Wednesday, June 13, 2007 8 53 AM To Tuncay, Barbara Subject Hillside Community Church Dear Planning Commission members I have attended Hillside Community Church since 2003 and I became a Christian there Hillside has been a source of strength and guidance for my husband and I since our relationship began We fully support its efforts to expand and thereby offer its services to more people m the community and lead them to Christ We urge you to give Hillside what rt needs to continue serving Rancho Cucamonga and the surrounding areas Thank you for your consideration Regards, Chuck and Jennifer DeVall You snooze, you lose Get messages ASAP with AutoCheck m the all-new Yahoos Mail Beta 7/17/2007 Page 1 of 1 Tuncay, Barbara From Wells, AI (GE Infra, Aviation, US) [al wells@ge coin] Sent Wednesday, June 13, 2007 8 29 AM To Tuncay, Barbara Subject Hillside Church /Planning Commission Issue Planning Commission City of Rancho Cucamonga, CA 6/13/2007 it seems to me that the good works that Hillside Church is doing with their sports programs is far more important than one, or two disgruntled neighbors, especially when the church programs have been there long before there were any houses Our future, is our children, and to instill good morals, and ethics is something that Hillside strives to incorporate along with the understanding that God loves them Family values should start at home, but many children in R C do not receive the kind words, and attention that Hillside provides at these activities on the field at the back lot of their church Please DO NOT let these vital leaning activities be disrupted, or changed in any way to satisfy an individual that knew all about these when they moved into the neighborhood Thank you, AI Wells 6207 Sunnyhdls Place Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91737 7/17/2007 Page 1 of 2 Tuncay, Barbara From Sheila Mitchell [s mitche1140@verizon net] Sent Tuesday, June 12, 2007 11 00 PM To 'Sec of department', Tuncay, Barbara, Tuncay, Barbara, 'Sec of Department' Subject please forward to planning commission re Planning Commission meeting for Hillside Church, Wed June 13 Importance High I apologize for the many email addresses, but the original one came back as undeliverable From: Sheila Mitchell [mailto s mitche1140@verizon net] Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2007 10 35 PM To: bttuncay@cityofrc us, council@cityofrc us Subject: Planning Commission meetingfor Hillside Church, Wed June 13 Importance: High Dear Members of the Council and Commission, As a member of Hillside Community Church, it has been brought to my attention that a small number of neighbors adjacent to the church have complained of the activities taking place upon church property Such a complaint can be expected from those who think the world is to revolve around them For someone to move into an existing situation, and then complain about it is very self-centered thinking We encounter that mentality when the freeway was built and those people who bought property backed up to the right of way, complained about the freeway going in As a courtesy, we let them voice their opposition, but not give it serious consideration Unfortunately, that same mindset has found a supportive voice in Rancho Cucamonga, and we must address it The questions become, 1) has this small group of individuals "moved toward the nuisance" or has the "nuisance moved towards theme Easily answered, the church situated on this property 25 years ago And as with any business, or organization, or city for that matter, growth is expected praised and planned for If someone is opposed to the resulting and publicized activities, they should not move to it 2) Does the activity benefit the greater good of the community Again, easily answered, the fields, although built and maintained by Hillside Church, are home field to many of the youth and adults of Rancho Cucamonga Many of which are not attendees of weekly services of Hillside, but do enjoy the benefits of the fields No different than Rancho Cucamonga's parks How many neighbors will it take to Close Redhill Park for the same reason Close Quakes Stadium because of the noise of a ball game Close the court house because of the potential threat of a fail break Limit the hours of operation of the freeway because of the noise Close Victoria Gardens during holiday shopping season because of the increase noise and traffic Limit traffic on mayor roads because of the continuous traffic noise MOST OF WHICH WERE BUILT AFTER THE ADJACENT HOMES, UNLIKE HILLSIDE BEFORE THE HOMES There is no end to the scenarios your decision today effects And finally, on a personal note, as someone who is actively involved I local politics, I ask myself who is the source of these complaints, and who do they know to even have such a request brought before the planning commissions Is that number less if the opposition's voice is a big campaign contnbutor~ Is that number less if the oppositions supportive voice comes from one who has given you the power to make these decisions An insulting question only because of the insulting situation being considered If any of you would like to discuss this letter or your thoughts with me personally, please feel free to call me at my number below Regards, Tom Mitchell Member of Hillside Church 7/17/2007 Tuncay, Barbara From surfin4fun@verizon net Sent Tuesday, June 12, 2007 10 32 PM To Tuncay, Barbara Subject Hillside Community Church To whom it may concern My name is Jill Partridge and I am a senior at Los Osos High School I have also been a member of Hillside Community Church (HCC) for 11 years I would be attending the City Council meeting on Wednesday the 13th but I am graduating that night I thought instead to show my support for HCC, I would send an email I grew up being very involved in HCC's children's ministries and our Upward Bound Sports programs Most of my favorite childhood memories come from my time at HCC I spent many Saturdays at HCC playing games but also learning essential skills such as teamwork The programs provided a positive, safe environment to learn, exercise, and have fun Children in our community have the opportunity to come and be involved with friends their own age in a place where they will not discover any negative activities likely to be found somewhere else These programs were a tremendous part of my childhood and it saddens me to think that other children will not be able to have the same experiences The programs are a huge benefit to our community because they were established to fill a need, not dust for HCC members but for anyone in the community My time spent at HCC and the life long friends I made have completely shaped me into the person I am today and they now give me an opportunity to volunteer and give back to the children now Thank you for your time, Jill Partridge 1 Page 1 of 1 Tuncay, Barbara From Holly Kollert [hkollert@charter net] Sent Tuesday, June 12, 2007 10 42 PM To Tuncay, Barbara Subject Hdiside Community Church Dear Council Members, I want to share with you the importance that Hillside Community Church has had in my life as well as that of my 16 year old son We began attending Hillside in 1995 and my son was actively involved in their sports ministry program playing soccer, baseball, basketball and football These programs have been very beneficial in the lives of the kids that participate as well as that of their parents To this day, my son remains very connected with his peers through Hillside and I am very thankful for the positive environment the church continues to provide to the community A grateful Hillside Attendee 7/17/2007 Page 1 of 1 Tuncay, Barbara From Mary Chandler [hrtdzir@hotmail com] Sent Tuesday, June 12, 2007 3 25 PM To Tuncay, Barbara Subject Hillside Community Church To the Planning Commission: I urge you to support Hillside Community Church in the matter of the disgruntled neighbors Hillside has been at its current location for nearly thirty years, long before any homes were around there It has always been very obvious that a church was on that corner of land. People know this when they buy there. The programs that Hillside provides for kids and adults of all ages are wonderful, positive activities. It Is a shame that a small group of people can make such a lot of fuss over the sound of kids having fun My house used to be dust above Beryl Park. I loved the sounds I heard that were the result of the sports activities taking place. Thousands of lives have been touched through the programs and activities of Hillside church. That is a much greater number than the few who are complaining. Please put an end to their frivolous harassment. Sincerely, Mary E. Chandler FREE Animations for your email - by Incred~Mail~ Click Here ~ _- _ , -._ f`,-i 7/17/2007 Tuncay, Barbara From Amanda Douglas (STUDENT) [adouglas@apu edu] Sent Tuesday, June 12, 2007 2 27 PM To Tuncay, Barbara Subject Hillside Community Church My name is Amanda Douglas and I represent both the city of Rancho Cucamonga as an employee and a staff member at Hillside Community Church I am also a resident of the nieghborhood surrounding the church as I live only four houses down from the church itself I have been attending the church for eleven years now and have been a part of almost every program that is currently at risk of being shut down due to the complaints of other surrounding neighbors I can promise you right now that I would not be the woman I am today without these programs The Just for Kids Sports programs (now known as Upward Bound Sports) taught me the teamwork, the baptisms that I was one time a part of gave me a goal to live for, the childrens ministries (which I now lead worship for) along with the Junior High Minisitry (which I am now a small group leader for) and the High School Ministry all are a part of shaping the determined and hard working woman that was hired to work for the community service department in your city Surely a small amount of noise that is always over well before ten o' clock is a small price to pay for what these programs do for not only the youth of the city, but for everyone that is a part of our teen and adult ministries because it gives them a place to go instead of creating chaos in the city of Rancho Thank you for your time in reading this email -Amanda Douglas 1 Page 1 of 1 Tuncay, Barbara From kcradds@aol coin Sent Tuesday, June 12, 2007 1 45 PM To Tuncay, Barbara I'm the second generation of our family to live m Alta Loma since 1972 I remember when StaterBros on Baseline and Carnelian was put in I rode my horse to Alta Loma Jr High School I love Alta Loma I moved away for a short while but new this is where I wanted my children to grow up and go to school and church Hillside Community Church ~s the perfect place to keep kids (especially teens) involved and out of trouble In this very troubled world, they need a sanctuary On graduation night, my 17 year old boy doesn't have a safe place to calibrate now that you aren't letting them gather in the church How absurd is that Is all logic going out the doom Are you against Gods or~ust our children What cam I do to be heard I'm so disappointed I will not vote for you m the next elections nor will any one I know AOL now offers free email to everyone Fmd out more about what's free from AOL at AQL.com 7/17/2007 Tuncay, Barbara From mturner900@charter net Sent Tuesday, June 12, 2007 1 31 PM To Tuncay, Barbara Subject Hillside Sports Programs Importance High Dear Planning Commission, We are residents of Alta Loma who support the need for baseball, soccer, and the other sports programs that Hillside Community Church provide Both of our children have participated in the program and have benefitted greatly The atmosphere, coaching, and emphasis on teamwork and proper attitude are not present in any other program in the area we've participated in We believe that the Hillside program is needed and is a vital part of the community Regards, Michael and Janice Turner 11102 Gettysburg Drive Alta Loma, CA 91737 Tuncay, Barbara From Paul W Aden [psaden@charter net] Sent Tuesday, June 12, 2007 1 06 PM To Tuncay, Barbara Subject Hillside Community Church Sports Program Dear Planning Commission, I would like to express my desire to see the Hillsides sport program continue to operate unencumbered, within the limits of the churches current conditional use permit of course Both of my children went through the sports program It provides an environment where the children can play sports and grow socially without as much pressure as some other sports programs Thank you for your consideration in this manner Respectfully Paul W Aden Page 1 of 1 Tuncay, Barbara From MARLA PRADO [MPRADO@nalto k12 ca us] Sent Tuesday, June 12, 2007 12 56 PM To Tuncay, Barbara Cc mfrance@hdisideministry org, SappYZ250f@aol coin Subject Hillside Community Church Activities Hi This letter is m reference to Hillside Community Church and the asset their programs are to our community and Rancho Cucamonga as a whole I have 5 children, all of which participate in the wonderful and successful programs at Hillside The programs available to our communities children are very effective, run smoothly, and benefit the children m many ways They provide strong believe systems, build good self- esteem, and give the children basic skills necessary m all areas of growth, behavior, educational, academic, social skills, sport skills etc Hillside Community Church should be allowed to continue ALL activities as they started the church far before any homes m the area were built Again, Hillside provides many programs that ONLY POSITIVELY BENEFIT the community as a whole They are in no way a hindrance to the city Thank you for your time I hope my letter goes to the person m charge of the hearing tomorrow Whom ever it is needs to here all the good this church is doing m our community and world Have a great days Smiles Marla Prado 7/17/2007 Page 1 of 1 Tuncay, Barbara From aylor40@aim coin Sent Tuesday, June 12, 2007 11 39 AM To Tuncay, Barbara Subject Hillside Community Church To whom rt may concern, I am one of the lucky people to have been one of the first children to be a part of the sports programs put together by Hillside Community Church I played basketball in the Just 4 Kids program m 6th grade and rt taught me that sports are not truly about winning but about being apart of a team and having fun That is something that I carried with me throughout high school while playing at Rancho Cucamonga High School and still do to this day I have a true passion for the sports programs that the church provides, from basketball, soccer, football, baseball, softball, tenors, volleyball and cheerleadmg Hillside has brought forth a quality program focused on creating quality people who can take lessons learned from being apart of a sports team and use them later on m life and become a productive member of society While the competition is there Upward Bound Sports focuses on having fun and any issue we may have ever had has come solely from competitive souls outside of the organization Hillside is my church home and has been for 20 years, and the events put together by the church has given so much back to the city, by creating a beautiful campus for people to come too and by providing events that are open to anyone who wishes to come Events like our Soapbox derby created an amazing event for the city 2 years m a row, our sports camps promote 2 of the cities mayor high schools (RC High school and Los Osos High School) and many of our local college and high school coaches and there teams Hillside has never closed its doors to any of our neighbors or to the city as they have hosted numerous services for police and firemen and there is no reason why Hillside should be asked to close its doors on events on there campus by the city in which it aims to serve and give too Sincerely, Bryan Aylor Check Qut the new tree AIM~Ma~I -- 2 GB of storage and industry-leading Spam and email virus protection 7/17/2007 RETURN ADDRESS NAME Tuncay, Barbara From Lorl Englehardt [lore englehardt@charter net] Sent Tuesday, June 12, 2007 11 14 AM To Tuncay, Barbara Subject Planning Commission Meeting, June 13, 2007 Follow Up Flag Follow up Flag Status Red Re Hillside Community Church June 12, 2007 Mr James R Troyer, AICP Planning Director City of Rancho Cucamonga Dear Mr Troyer Page 1 of 2 7779 DanburyDnve Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Phone (909) 941 0502 E fax (909) 941 0502 lore englehardt@chartervet It has come to my attention that a resident of Rancho Cucamonga (Alta Loma) has taken offense to certain programs and/or activities that go on at Hillside Community Church, located at 5354 Haven Avenue While, I believe, this resident has a right to express her dissatisfaction with her neighbors, I too believe that I, as a member of this Church family and our city, have a right to express what is positive and enriching about the programs/activities that are going on at Hillside Community Church (HCC) Specifically, I would like to focus on Hillside's "Upward Bound Sports" Program Many years ago, my husband and I had our two oldest boys involved in Rancho Little League Though we had some excellent coaches through that program, and our boys were learning how to play the game of baseball, the program, unfortunately, lacked a mayor component to a young man's development~haracter While I firmly believe it is primarily the parents' responsibility to instill and model this vital component in their children's development, I also believe it is important to involve kids in community activities that allow them to experience instances of character and good citizenship in action Sadly, we found that this was not the case with Rancho's Little League Program, at that time Not only did we witness how it didn't matter If a child was an excellent player, the amount of time he played corresponded to how involved his parents were on the Board, but also, how poorly the spectators at the games behaved The final incident that prompted us to look for another sports program for our kids was when several parents/family members on opposing teams started using extremely fowl language and then physically fighting with each other What a sad display of adult behavior this was for our impressionable youth Fortunately for us, as we love to be involved in sports, we had heard of other families choosing Hillside Community Church's Upward Bound Sports (UBS) Program for the same reasons that we were experiencing with the City's program, so we decided to give it a try We found it to be a night and day experiences Though some people we have talked with 7/17/2007 RETURN ADDRESS NAME Page 2 of 2 since feel that the UBS Program is not as extremely "competitive" as other community sports programs that are around, we have found it a refreshing difference Through Hillside's UBS Program, kids are being taught how to play sports and to be competitive and confident without having to be mean, vulgar, and/or violent It is an excellent program to further instill character and moral integrity in today's youth, which are values that carry on into their adult years to help create excellent leaders who can give back to their community in return We now have our fourth son involved ~n Hillside's Baseball program, and have been to many, many games on the fields at HCC The fans who attend those games exhibit exemplary behavior They may get excited (as we know all sport fans do), but it is never with contempt, anger or vulgarity You could come to any game there and see for yourself It really is an amazing programs I can say with confidence that you would walk away wondering what any of our neighboring residents could possibly have to complain about And, sir, this same holds true with all the other events that are taking place on Hillside's Campus I know, I've been there for about 15 years now It's better than living next to a public park or school - it is filled with happy voices that are having FUN in a good and positive ways Isn't that what we want in this worlds In this community I appreciate your taking the time to read this letter I hope you will take my experiences into consideration when making any important decisions in regards to this matter Sincerely, Mrs Lori Englehardt 7/17/2007 Tuncay, Barbara From Bob Evans [r~evans971 @hotmail com] Sent Tuesday, June 12, 2007 10 21 AM To Tuncay, Barbara Subject Hillside Community Church Hello My family has been attending Hillside for 8 years Our children have been a part of the sports programs and the childrens through High School ministries and enjoy them very much We believe these programs are a very positive influence on our community and should not be scaled back We would like to come to the city council meeting, but it conflicts with graduation ceremonies Bob Evans Get a preview of Live Earth, the hottest event this summer - only on MSN http //liveearth msn commasource=msntaglineliveearthhm 1 Page 1 of 1 Tuncay, Barbara From dupsont@netscape net Sent Tuesday, June 12, 2007 9 58 AM To Tuncay, Barbara Follow Up Flag Follow up Flag Status Red To Whom it may concern Our family has attended Hillside Community Church for four years and had all four of our boys involved with the Upward Bound Sports Program This program has fulfilled a need m our community which our boys could not have received elsewhere This unique way of guiding our children m good sportsmanship, accepting others and encouraging parents to give positive comments and praise has been wonderful for our sons Due to Upward Bound Sports, those children who may not feel comfortable participating m the city sports program have a place to try out a sport for the first time or learn to encourage others who are playing for the first time After learning the skills taught by Upward Bound Sports, our boys now feel confident playing sports at school and after aging out of the church program, now play for the city league Upward Bound Sports does not compete with city leagues, it enhances what is already m place for our youth Many of our top high school athletes began learning their skills through Upward Bound Sports Without the cooperation of our city, our boys will not have a place to learn the skills necessary to play high school sports This may impact the number of children involved with sports and provide less opportunity for our youth to thrive and grow m a positive environment As the parents of four athletic boys, we implore the city officials to provide a place for our sons to learn their athletic skills through Upward Bound Sports Thank you for your time and attention m this matter, The Thomas Family Check Out the_new fa•ee AIM(R) Mail -- 2 GB of storage and industry-leading spam and email virus protection 7/17/2007 Page 1 of 1 Tuncay, Barbara From Dee Whitt [dee@rainbowacres com] Sent Tuesday, June 12, 2007 8 15 AM To Tuncay, Barbara Subject Hillside Church Please open your heart & mind to the thought of how a church impacts a town It is better to have people serving God in a neighborhood than to have people that only think of themselves We will pray for your group to be lead in the right direction and to do Gods will for the Hillside Church use Thank you Dee Whitt Rainbow Acres Camp Verde, AZ 7/17/2007 Page 1 of 2 Tuncay, Barbara From Cindy Runge [coastcoring@msn coin] Sent Tuesday, June 12, 2007 8 05 AM To Tuncay, Barbara Subject Hillside Community Church Vital To Our Community Attachments Planning Commission Letter doc Steve c~ CZnc~y 12unge 5325 Pendot Avenue Alta Loma, CA 91701 Home & Fax (909)987-8854 June 6, 2007 Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 To Whom It May Concern We understand that the Planning Commission will be meeting to discuss Hillside Community Church and its many community functions We regrettably will not be able to make this meeting due to our daughter graduating on that very same evening, however we do feel compelled to let you know our opinion on this matter We have attended or viewed the many City Council Meetings where we may have a community member speak out against what the church is doing here m our community Well, we feel that it is time that you have heard from the many members of the community that have benefited from Hillside and the many community outreaches that it has been a part of We have been attending for over eight years now and we can tell you that if rt wasn't for Hillside, our children would not be the incredible teenagers that they are First by starting m the sports program and being lifted up by loving coaches who did not hesitate to play our children, even when they were not the best players on the team They were praised for the smallest of efforts The sports program at Hillside is very well organized, monitored and needed At times our children are what have kept us connected to the church There have been so many exciting things happen to us as a church family Our kids, along with many others have invited fnends to church events when there lives were on a path to destruction Our church welcomed them m whole heartedly and I am convinced that many of these kids would be running the streets or have run-ms with the police if it wasn't for the many great programs that our youth group offers Many great events like Undergrad Night, Tuesday or Wednesday night Jr High and High School Group fun or cool bands playing are what attracts our community teenagers Would you rather see them hanging out m the streets or coming to a church event that preaches doing the right thing, loving God and serving others Aside from helping our community kids, Hillside also helps our community elderly, widowed, single and the sick We have fix-it days where we go out and help the community fix up their house, garden or what ever their needs are We also help them with oil changes and car washes These are only a few of things that Hillside Community Church does for OUR COMMUNITY We would hope that you would evaluate your decisions based on the years of evidence and proof of the benefits that Hillside Community Church and its members provide m our community We will pray that we can continue to help the community in the same capacitythat we have for many years, and that the church can continue to brow as it has been forecasted for the past 26 years now We 7/ 17/2007 Page 2 of 2 will also pray that all of the neighbors might grow to see the many benefits that Hillside has m our community and that maybe they will even~om us m helping to serve and better our community Please feel free to contact us with any questions that you may have Sincerely, Steve & Cindy Runge Cindy Runge (909)987-8854 Rancho Cucamonga*Relay For Life Event Chair www acsevents org/relay/ca/ranchocucamonga Every hour, about 15 Californians receive a cancer diagnosis 1 800 ACS 2345 For Support, Progress, Research & Answers Each day is a gift from God, How you hve rt is your gift to him 7/17/2007 --- Page 1 of 1 Tuncay, Barbara From Gregory L Bentley [gbentley@sbd-law comJ Sent Tuesday, June 12, 2007 8 41 AM To Tuncay, Barbara Subject Hillside Community Church Our family has attended Hillside Community Church for over 10 years and have participated in many of the sport programs The Hillside sports programs are very positive, well run and benefit the community Gregory L Bentley SHERNOFF BIDART & DARRAS 600 S Indian Hill Blvd Claremont, CA 91711 (909) 621-4935 7/ 17/2007 Page 1 of 1 Tuncay, Barbara From Mike Fisher [mike@fishercc coin] Sent Monday, June 11, 2007 11 48 PM To Tuncay, Barbara Subject Hillside Community Church/Upward Bound Sports To the RC City Planning Commission, I wanted to send off a quick note as you consider the issues with Hillside Community Church and a handful of it's neighbors My 2 children have both participated in sports and children's events held on the field at Hillside Community Church My wife and I believe that what is occurring there is of substantial benefit to hundreds of Rancho citizens and their families, both church members and people that have never attended a church service there The coaches selected by Upward Bound Sports are very much focused on teaching the children and having fun rather than being ultra competitive and aggressive As such, I think it is a great opportunity for my kids and many others to learn the basics of soccer, baseball, etc in a sportsmanlike manner that is not always seen in other leagues To limit the ability of Hillside to use it's facilities in this way would be a significant loss to the community Hillside also hosts, most often at their own expense, functions for youth of all ages periodically through the year that are designed to be a fun, well chaperoned positive place for kids to gather and play in a manner that is not destructive to others One such event designed for High School students to have a safe and fun place to go on the last day of school was cancelled due to the challenges faced of late It is sad because the church was providing a safe place for kids in our community to be as an alternative to doing unhealthy things that are a nuisance to the community It is my belief that these types of events should be encouraged and supported as we work together as a community to raise healthy and productive children Setting forth an overly restrictive use policy for facilities of this nature (I suspect that a precedent would be set) would serve to rob our children of good and healthy recreation Qpportunities I ask that this be strongly considered as you chart a plan of action Thank you for your time and consideration in this matter Mike Fisher 6950 Cartilla Ave Alta Loma, CA 91701 909-225-5930 7/17/2007 Page 1 of 1 Tuncay, Barbara From Kathy Martin [KAMartm22@charter net] Sent Monday, June 11, 2007 8 48 PM To Tuncay, Barbara Subject HCC We moved to RC in 1988 and have been a part of HCC since 1982 Our family has contributed to each new building program and we have been strong supporters of each new project We believe that what takes place at Hillside has significantly impacted us as a family as well as positively impacted our community We urge you to allow all activities that take place there Sincerely, Kathy Martin 7/17/2007 Page 1 of 1 Tuncay, Barbara From Schlappi [sschlappi@charter net] Sent Monday, June 11, 2007 8 34 PM To Tuncay, Barbara Subject Great for kids To whom it may concern, I Just wanted to respond about the few neighbors that are complaining about the children's programs at Hillside Community church First of all I think it is silly for a person or persons to knowingly move in to a neighborhood with an organization that has an established outdoor program, and then complain about the program don't your My kids have both grown up in the Hillside sports programs and have learned about sportsmanship, respecting others and the importance of community This Church offers kids the opportunity to play games, while at the same time learn life lessons and how to be better citizens I do hope the city council and the powers that be think about the good that is provided for thousands of kids when they listen to a few (and I do mean a few) disgruntled neighbors that chose to move into the existing church neighborhood and then decided to protest the activity It reminds me of the people who moved into Chino housing tracts next to dairies and then complained about the flies Maybe I'm missing something here but this issue seems like a no brainier to me Thank you for your consideration, Stu Schlappi 909-987-3895 7/17/2007 Page 1 of 1 Tuncay, Barbara From Fred Mouat [f_mouat@hotmail com] Sent Monday, June 11, 2007 8 04 PM To Tuncay, Barbara Subject Hillside Community Church's Sports Program Please forward this email to all of the Planning Commission members as soon as possible, but prior to the 7 pm meeting this Wednesday night Thank you To the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission I have been a resident of this community since 1996 and truly love it here I am also a member of Hillside Community Church, and am quite familiar with their children's sports programs, including outdoor baseball and soccer, as well as their many other worthwhile activities that benefit the community at large and the children specifically I understand that one or more of the church's neighbors have labeled these programs a "public nuisance", and that they have requested the programs be drastically scaled back I totally disagree with this, and personally feel that the programs are of considerable benefit to the residents of the City and their children Further, the use of the athletic fields for sports programs were approved by the City Planning Commission many years ago, and nothing has changed about their scope or benefits My wife and I urge you to reject any attempt to severely constrain Hillside's beneficial sports programs for Rancho Cucamonga's kids at your meeting this Wednesday night Thank you Fred W Mouat Hotmail to goy Get your Hotmail, news, sports and much mores Check out the New MSN Mobile 7/17/2007 Page 1 of 1 Tuncay, Barbara From Maggi [iggam93@charter net] Sent Monday, June 11, 2007 7 59 PM To Tuncay, Barbara Subject Hillside Community Church Dear Planning Commission, I understand that we are having problems with a neighbor. I dust wanted to say that Hillside's sports program is very great for kids Kindergarten - 8th grade. It brings them closer to God while playing a sport they love. I have played softball, volleyball, and soccer through Hillside and it has brought me closer to God and I have made new friends. Also we are expanding our church to make room for new people.We have an awesome plan, because it is God's plan.To be in the Jr. High and High School programs means a lot to me because it means that I have a great place to go on Tuesday nights. Not being able to have our High School services on Sunday nights would take away our opportunity to worship and learn about God's love in our own way. So I say that we keep doing what we are doing at Hillside Community Church. Sincerely, Maggi Kowalski Age 13 7/17/2007 Page 1 of 1 Tuncay, Barbara From CPAPJ@aol coin Sent Monday, June 11, 2007 7 15 PM To Tuncay, Barbara Subject Please Give to Planning Commission Before Meeting on Wed Jun13th - Thank Your I would really appreciate it if you could print this out, and give it to the Planning Commission before their meeting this Wednesday night, June 13th Thank you so much Dear Planning Commission, As a citizen of Rancho Cucamonga, who values how children are raised, I especially love our community which has always supported children's activities and sports programs On any given night, you can drive around Rancho Cucamonga and see children involved in a variety of sports Take a look at the happy faces and camaraderie amongst the children and their parents, and you realize the immense value of these programs Hillside Community has a very long standing position in our community, supporting children's activities and their thriving sports programs for any and all children of Rancho Cucamonga I would hope that they can continue doing this for many yearn Even though my children are now grown, I still see the value in having kids involved in team sports, and learning core values like working together and fair play I sincerely hope that you would not let one or two people take away such a vital programsi If they were to ruin it for one sports program, the door would be open to close down another program Please let Hillside continue doing their part in keep the children of our community active and busy in their great sports programs Thank you, Peggy Wells See what's free at AOL coin 7/17/2007 Tuncay, Barbara From Kathy Finnerty [finnerty22@earthlink net] Sent Monday, June 11, 2007 6 39 PM To Tuncay, Barbara Subject Hillside Community Church Dear Sirs, Please be aware that as charter members of Hillside Community Church, we have always felt that we had a good relationship with the city of Rancho Cucamonga From the original use permit, 20 years ago, to this building project, we've always been able to provide mutual benefits for us and the City of Rancho Cucamonga However, the latest proposed restrictions, because of one voice, as opposed to the thousands of attendees at Hillside, is completely untenable Let hope that we can have a fair resolution Sincerely, Kevin and Kathy Finnerty 5159 Silver Mountain Way Alta Loma, CA 91737 909-987-5881 No virus found in this outgoing message Checked by AVG Free Edition Version 7 5 472 / Virus Database 269 8 13/843 - Release Date 6/10/2007 1 39 PM 1 Page 1 of 1 Tuncay, Barbara From its~uls@netzero net Sent Monday, June 11, 2007 6 21 PM To Tuncay, Barbara Subject Hillside Community Church on Haven/Vista Grove RE Hillside Community Church on Haven/Vista Grove, Rancho Cucamonga To whom rt may concern I am wasting this on behalf of, not only the Hillside Church Community, but also on behalf of our Rancho Cucamonga Community and nearby areas The Upward Bound Sports and other community events held on the grounds of Hillside Community Church are very important to our family, the Rancho community and local areas The church reaches out to others in the community to welcome them and spread the Word of God We have raised four children with the Word of God through Hillside Community Church All the wonderful activities offered through the church are invaluable Our eldest is now 25 years old, the next is 16 and we have 14 year old twins We have been with the church since our twins were three years old We have all been very active with the church, not only on Sundays, but vanous days of the weeks over the past eleven years -involved serving with the Children's and Youth Ministry, Upward Bound Sports, Women's Ministry, Missions m Mexico, Samaritan's Purse, etc Our involvement and service is not dust for our family, but for our community -Rancho Cucamonga, and others in need The church has been and is a very positive influence for the community It has grown considerably since our first days I believe this growth of the church is m keeping with the growth of Rancho's population Let's keep up with the growth Sincerely The Burney Family 7/17/2007 Page 1 of 2 Tuncay, Barbara From Donna Orabona [taximomtoo@hotmail coin] Sent Monday, June 11, 2007 5 44 PM To Tuncay, Barbara Hellos I know you are getting a lot of e-mails about HCC's sports program and activities and that there are complaints by some neighbors I dust wanted to say that we have been attending Hillside for over seven years My kids were in 3rd and 6th grade at the time we started My son, our oldest, had never been really interested in playing sports (found out later that it was dust lack of confidence) By the time he felt confident enough to play, he was m 7th grade If you have kids, or know of people with kids m sports, you know that 7th grade is a tough age to begin a sport Most sports programs have kids who have been playing since early elementary Anyway, my point is that at Hillside, my son domed a basketball team, and while he definitely was not a good player, the coach was very encouraging and so were his teammates They all cheered for each other and praised each other, and most important, my son actually PLAYED m the game, and was not a benchwanner I can't tell you what a confidence booster that was for him This was an experience he would not have gotten from any other organization The coaches for all the sports -soccer, baseball, bb, are well-trained m the sport they are teaching, but they also provide spmtual and personal encouragement It truly is an AWESOME program I would hate to see it get shut down My kids are now teenagers and have been very active m the high school ministry My son plays the drums and my daughter sings Again, this church provides opportunity for kids to grow and use their God-given talents My son did not have to loin a yelling, screaming, rock band to get experience playing the drums, he learned by playing contemporary-style worship music Think about how awesome this is for us and for the other parents to have their kids get into playing music to worship Gods He would not have had this experience had it not been for this church Same goes for my daugther, who is 15 She gets the opportunity to sing on stage and worship God through music The church held an activity last year on the last day of school called "under-grad night " It was to celebrate the last day of school for the highschoolers It was an opportunity for them to bang their friends (even non-Christian ones) to a safe place to have fun No driving around from party to party, no drugs or alcohol, totally supervised, totally under control and totally FUNS Everyone was really disappointed that this year's celebration was cancelled I wish the neighbor or neighbors who are complaining knew how BENEFICIAL this church is to the young people of this commumty~ One more point I would like to make If I were looking for a house, I personally would not buy a house near a school or a park, because I don't like the lights, the noise or the traffic When we chose our home m Alta Loma, we picked a home which was about 1/4 mile from where the freeway was to go m (this was in 1992) We KNEW a freeway would be open one day When the freeway opened up, it was much noisier than we expected, but we did not complain We did not get upset, we did not run to the City and squawk about the noise It was OUR CHOICE to move here If the noise really bothered us, we would move I understand that the neighbor who is complaining the most dust recently moved in Perhaps they should have checked things out before they purchased the house It is not fair for entire programs at awell-respected church be cancelled and changed dust because one or two people bought a home right next to a church Okay, well this was longer than I meant for it to be My name is Donna Orabona, my husband is 7/17/2007 Page 2 of 2 Louis We are 47 years old, and our children are 18 and 15 Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions Thank you for your consideration Donna Orabona Makes C~o-cL S wii~.e~- -~ 7/17/2007 Nature Page 1 of 1 Tuncay, Barbara From Fowler,Jim fowler@mwdh2o com] Sent Monday, June 11, 2007 5 42 PM To Tuncay, Barbara s' -~ ' ~' - " - - Rartchv Cucamonga City Planntng Coinsmssto~t, I have been a city member for the last 28 years. I am also a member of Hillside Cosrcmurizty Church, and feel that the acttvztzes that Hillside Comnnenity Church provzdes are benefeficial to the conzrtiiinity These programs provide a safe environment for all, kids and adults alilce It would be liorrible that one or tzvo people could make a city shut dozen sorrietliirig that "church" and "non church" people have benefitted in the past years Let's look at reason James L Fowler 6347 Via Serena Alta Lvina 97 702 909-941-2207 ~ifoullerwerizon.net 7/17/2007 Page 1 of 1 Tuncay, Barbara From TOM LANDRETH [tlandrethclan@msn com] Sent Monday, June 11, 2007 5 26 PM To Tuncay, Barbara Subject Hillside community church To Whom it may concern. I'm writing in regards to the decision the city counal is taking in consideration between hillside community church and a local resident that lives close to the church It's been brought to my attention that the aforementioned resident is trying to get the city council do deem the activities at the church as a Public Nuisance I am a married man with four children who attends Hillside We've attended the church for 10 years and this has been the first complaint of this kind, that I've heard of, since attending the church In fact many of the church patrons live in the same area as the resident making the complaint The church and the sports activities have been a great source of enjoyment for my family and I I have enjoyed coaching kids in the sports programs and all my kids have participated in all the sports in this very positive and encouraging environment I love the fact that Hillside community church and Upward Bound Sports provides an atmosphere where winning isn't the only thing in life, but it is how we play and act that's important We have had a number of young players go through our sports program that have "Downs Syndrome" and other physical or mental handicaps that would hinder them from ever playing sports Like ALSO or ACE Baseball The Parents of these children are so happy to put their kids in the sports program Watching their kids have a great time and the caring way the coaches interact and teach their kids how to play a certain sport is a key reason these children keep coming back to play the following years This in itself is a great reason to let hillside and Upward Bound Sports to continue its sports program and soaai gatherings at the church for its definitely beneficial to the community I don't understand how a church and Its activities could be called a public nuisance With all the wonderful parks and schools in the community that have Ayso and little league playing games at them, are they to going to become a public nuisance dust because a home owner who moves in near a school or park decides to deem it as such Due to the new building being built Hillside has lost over ~/2 of the property that was used for the sports program and other activities, so there isn't as much activity that there used to be I sincerely hope that the city council will be able to clearly see how important Hillside Community Church and Upward Bound Sports is to 1000's of tax paying citizens living in this community Thank you TOM LANDRETH 7/17/2007 Tuncay, Barbara From Brandon Gill [hiskid85@sbcglobal net] Sent Monday, June 11, 2007 4 21 PM To Tuncay, Barbara Subject Hillside Community Church To Whom It May Concern I am a taxpaying citizen of Alta Loma, CA, and I love this community I believe that Hillside Community Church is nothing short of a subtle treasure and an invaluable asset to the city I have been attending Hillside for almost 4 years It is a place where anyone--even those opposed to the church's existence--can come, feel welcome, and participate in a community of ordinary people I have attended countless events on Hillside's campus In my experience, I have watched the church's leadership and congregants be considerate and cooperative with its neighbors I would hate to see its activities restricted I believe doing so would be a travesty of justice Thank you for your careful consideration Regards, Brandon 1 Tuncay, Barbara From ~acksonfamily6@charter net Sent Monday, June 11, 2007 5 21 PM To Tuncay, Barbara Subject In support of community activities at Hillside Church To Whom It May Concern I am a registered republican, and I have been living in Alta Loma for the last 12 years My husband and I have raised our 4 children, here, and we love this community An integral part of our lives has been participating in the programs at Hillside Community Church I have had my kids in the play school at that facility, through the city of Rancho Cucamonga, my children have participated in soccer, basketball, volleyball, vacation Bible school, soap box derby, and a multitude of other Bible studies, concerts, and events My husband volunteer-coached sports at Hillside, and through that experience, he was introduced to people who gave him the opportunity to coach basketball for Los Osos High School, and in our small way reciprocate service to the community that has served us so well through the years We feel that our lives have been greatly enriched by the community that we've been involved with at Hillside Community Church They are a benefit to the greater community of children, and young adults, families, and the community in general My son is graduating from Los Osos on 06/13/2007, so while I will not be able to loin the city meeting on that evening, I did want to impress upon the council, the importance of the Hillside Community Church on our lives, and the lives of people in Alta Loma Please allow them to continue with the programs that they began, preceding the recent complaint Best regards, Henry & Dianne Jackson Henry and Dianne Jackson (909) 941-4710 10142 Northridge Drive Alta Loma, Ca 91737 Page 1 of 1 Tuncay, Barbara From DPipersky@aol coin Sent Monday, June 11, 2007 5 09 PM To Tuncay, Barbara Subject Hillside Community Church Dear Planning Commision, I am hoping that the a-mails you receive will help you to understand the positive impact Hillside Comm Church and their sports program have had on our community We have been a member of the church for 11 years now and have played sports, participated m afternoon activities all aimed at keeping our family front and center Our daughter has long since passed the age of Hillside sports, but the impact that it had on her will stay with her forever My husband continues to coach for the programs and we never cease to be amazed at the impact he and the sports program have on the youth of the community We dust ran into a single mom and a boy who played on my husband's baseball team two years ago His mom says he still has the picture of himself with his "coach" in his room Please consider your decisions very carefully It could be life changing for a generation of children Diana Pipersky ************************************** See what's free at http //www aol coin 7/17/2007 Page 1 of 1 Tuncay, Barbara From Larson, Kirk Sent Monday, June 11, 2007 5 08 PM To Email Broadcast Subject Death of Citizen Patrol Member Fred Gibbs It is with great sadness that we announce the death of Citizen Patrol Member Fred Gibbs He passed away from complications from a rare form of cancer He was 81 years old He is survived by his three children, six grandchildren, and two great grandchildren He has been a member of the Citizen Patrol since 1992 Also, he was an active member of the Veterans of Foreign Wars post in the city He will be greatly missed Funeral services will be held on Monday, June 18th at 1 00 P M at Draper's Mortuary located at 811 N Mountain Avenue in Ontario Kirk Larson Automotive & Safety Coordinator Rancho Cucamonga Police Department klarson@cityofrc us (909) 477-2876/FAX (909) 477-2879 7/17/2007 Page 1 of 1 Tuncay, Barbara From ~dschnetzler@aol coin Sent Monday, June 11, 2007 5 07 PM To Tuncay, Barbara Subject Hillside Comm Church Sports To Whom it may concern, My family and I attend HCC and both my children are involved m their sports program, Upward Bound Sports We are also neighbors of Hillside, as we live 4 houses away from the church We have been so happy to have such a wonderful sports program so close to home Hillside runs this program so professionally My children and many of their friends at school, and other friends in this community, who don't all attend Hillside, love these sports programs also We all come back year after year With my older child, who is now m high school, we teed sports w/the city, but my son was not very athletic and we saw immediately the difference m Hillside's sports program The children are encouraged and rt is not all about winning the game The coaches are kind and loving The other parents on the team are also so supportive of eachother's child There is no comparison to other sports programs Hillside is the best for any child As I said, we are also neighbors of Hillside and see this as a huge PLUS ~ ~ Never, not once, has any program at Hillside, sports programs or otherwise, ever been a nuisance or disturbed us m any way Thank You, Mrs Debra Schnetzler AOL now offers free email to everyone Find out more about what's free from AOL at AOI,.com 7/17/2007 Page 1 of 1 Tuncay, Barbara From Mark Bumstead [mbumstead909@earthlink net] Sent Monday, June 11, 2007 4 21 PM To Tuncay, Barbara Subject Regarding Hillside Community Church I dust wanted to send you a beef email to let you know how highly we as a family value the experience we have had a Hillside Community Church over the last 15 years We have been so blessed to attend a Community church, who values not dust Biblical values, but the interests of the community it serves We have been attending since the sports programs has begun at the church We have coached, and helped in many different capacities in these programs We have seen so many community children blossom under possitive comments by coaches as the play the various sports the programs have offered In the school district where I work, Hillside's sports programs are known for the way they improve children's self confidence and athletic ability Children are refered to them, for these reasons, totally separate from the church issue itself How could this be a "bad thing" or nuisances Our children are our community's future and I believe that Rancho Cucamonga has a strong focus on families and children in general The philosophy of Hillside seems to couple with the cities focus beautifully The churches location is perfect to be of influence on an entire community of homes who, otherwise, might have to drive miles and miles to participate in church or sports activities We pray and ask that you consider all the wonderful people who benefit directly from what Hillside Community Church has to offer 7 days a week from morning tonight Thank you so much for you attention to this email Marcia Bumstead 7/17/2007 Tuncay, Barbara From Tom Lazenby [tom@westendmrktg com] Sent Monday, June 11, 2007 4 15 PM To Tuncay, Barbara Subject Hillside Sports I would like to comment on the positive influence Hillside Sports have had on my son He started playing baseball with little league as a t-baller and yes my worse nightmare came true, the parents are as bad as the stories I had heard The next fall he began basketball at Hillside and then baseball in the spring He continued for three years in the baseball program where he was able to learn about baseball, being part of a team and how to have FUN while playing the game My son retuned to little leagus where he finished his second year of juniors on the all-star team He is now finishing his Freshman year at Los Osos where he will play Varsity Football next year He spent his high school required community service hours working with the Upward Bound Sports program at Hillside, because of the benefit he gained from this program In a city that values families and community, as Rancho says they do, it would be severe loss to our community if you forced Hillside to abandon their program Thank you, Tom Lazenby West End Marketing Office 951-672-1871 Mobile 951-757-1400 Fax 951-672-8388 tomC~westendmrktg com Tuncay, Barbara From Tuncay, Barbara Sent Monday, June 11, 2007 2 54 PM To Troyer, James Subject FW Hillside Community Church and another one -----Original Message----- From Beth Partridge [mailto Beth_Partridge@etiwanda k12 ca us] Sent Monday, June 11, 2007 2 53 PM To Tuncay, Barbara Subject Hillside Community Church To Whom it May Concern I am writing this letter in support of Hillside Community Church retaining their permits to continue activities on campus For the past 12 years our family has been involved with many wonderful activities at HCC Both of our children played sports through the Just 4 Kids and Upward Bound programs These are great programs that support fair play, good sportsmanship and competition As a family we have enjoyed countless activities that promoted family times and values This church has given our children a safety, friendly, and encouraging surrounding in which to mature and grow into young adults It saddens us to think that some one would feel that the church is out of bounds in their use of the campus Everything that happens at HCC is very well thought out and planned with the surrounding neighborhoods in mind Please consider all the good that this church provides for our community~~~ Sincerely, Mathew and Beth Partridge -------------------------------------------------------- The contents of this e-mail message and any attachments are intended solely for the addressee The information may also be confidential and/or legally privileged This transmission is sent for the sole purpose of delivery to the intended recipient If you have received this transmission in error, any use, reproduction, or dissemination of this transmission is strictly prohibited If you are not the intended recipient, please immediately notify the sender by reply e-mail and delete this message and its attachments, if any Please note that any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of the Etiwanda School District Finally, the recipient should check this email and any attachments for the presence of viruses The Etiwanda School District accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this email E-mail is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 USC SS 2510-2521 and is legally privileged Etiwanda School District, 6061 East Ave, Etiwanda, CA 91739, www etiwanda k12 ca us ESDN20060918-1 Tuncay, Barbara From Beth Partridge [Beth_Partndge@etiwanda k12 ca us] Sent Monday, June 11, 2007 2 53 PM To Tuncay, Barbara Subject Hillside Community Church Follow Up Flag Follow up Flag Status Red To Whom it May Concern I am writing this letter in support of Hillside Community Church retaining their permits to continue activities on campus For the past 12 years our family has been involved with many wonderful activities at HCC Both of our children played sports through the Just 4 Kids and Upward Bound programs These are great programs that support fair play, good sportsmanship and competition As a family we have enjoyed countless activities that promoted family times and values This church has given our children a safety, friendly, and encouraging surrounding in which to mature and grow into young adults It saddens us to think that some one would feel that the church is out of bounds in their use of the campus Everything that happens at HCC is very well thought out and planned with the surrounding neighborhoods in mind Please consider all the good that this church provides for our community~~~ Sincerely, Mathew and Beth Partridge The contents of this e-mail message and any attachments are intended solely for the addressee The information may also be confidential and/or legally privileged This transmission is sent for the sole purpose of delivery to the intended recipient If you have received this transmission in error, any use, reproduction, or dissemination of this transmission is strictly prohibited If you are not the intended recipient, please immediately notify the sender by reply e-mail and delete this message and its attachments, if any Please note that any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of the Etiwanda School District Finally, the recipient should check this email and any attachments for the presence of viruses The Etiwanda School District accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this email E-mail is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 USC SS 2510-2521 and is legally privileged Etiwanda School District, 6061 East Ave, Etiwanda, CA 91739, www etiwanda k12 ca us ESDN20060918-1 1 Page 1 of 2 Tuncay, Barbara From Tuncay, Barbara Sent Monday, June 11, 2007 2 35 PM To Troyer, James Subject FW Hillside Community Church Agenda Item FY I From: Brandy Williams [mailto bwilliamscsr@charter net] Sent: Monday, June 11, 2007 2 33 PM To: Tuncay, Barbara Cc: cbwilliamsl@charter net Subject: Hillside Community Church Agenda Item To: Members of the Planning Commission Regarding: Hillside Community Church Agenda Item I respectfully submit my comments to the Planning Commission for your consideration regarding the agenda item placed for June 13, 2007 I have been a resident of Rancho Cucamonga for all but one of the last 28 Years It could be said that I grew up m Rancho Cucamonga and now raise a family m Rancho Cucamonga Rancho Cucamonga is a wonderful city that is clearly motivated by raising healthy and happy children This is also the goal of Hillside Community Church In 1998 I found myself seeking a place that would help me to raise my new family and provide a moral and ethical model that I feel is critical to our future My wife located Hillside Community Church and after a few visits to the campus I saw a community of people working together for the betterment of our entire community Children's programs are my current focus and are undoubtedly the core to the Hillside Community Mission I have participated m Children's Sports, Family Events, Social Events, and rmmstnes that have taken place on the campus on each and every day of the week All of these events are well Planned, Organized and Supervised I have been continually impressed by the level of attention to the success of an event and the safety of the entire community When I learned that a "Public Nuisance" Inquire had begun I was shocked I have participated m several events over the last nine years that fall far short of the term "Public Nuisance " I would tike you to know how much planning takes place to minimize the effect on the neighbors and any traffic issues The hundreds of volunteers that I have worked with are cognizant of the impact of our events on the community We all feel that it is paramount that we provide a safe environment and care of all persons that are affected by our activity I have been a Police Officer for 15 years and now want to express my professional opinion A public nuisance is `A public nutsance is an interference with the common right of the general public or an indefinite number of persons, an unreasonable interference with the health, safety, peace, or comfort of the community " Copyright 1998-2005 David Carney, dba Tech Law Journal All rights reserved I would assert that the level planning, event coordination and history of successful events is evidence that the term public nuisance does not apply To the contrary, the events have provided a benefit to the Rancho Cucamonga Community and provided for the betterment of the general public and indefinite number of persons Yes, when you live in a residential community you must expect that a reasonable 7/17/2007 Page 2 of 2 amount of sound may be heard m and around your home It is unrealistic that one could expect that complete silence is normal The community benefits from the events at Hillside Community Church I believe that the plan for Hillside Community Church approved over 20 years ago was wise The wisdom of the members of that Planning Commission should not be reversed based upon unrealistic expectations The events at Hillside Community Church are important to our family I regret that I am unable to attend this event because of my work schedule Please feel free to contact me m the event that you require further input Christopher Wtlhams Christopher, Brandy, Skye and Ethan Williams 14126 Henderson Dnve Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91739 (909) 463-7707 cbwilhams 1 @charter net No virus found m this outgoing message Checked by AVG Free Edition Version 7 5 472 /Virus Database 269 8 13/843 -Release Date 6/10/2007 1 39 PM 7/17/2007 Page 1 of 2 Tuncay, Barbara From Brandy Williams [bwilliamscsr@charter net] Sent Monday, June 11, 2007 2 33 PM To Tuncay, Barbara Cc cbwilliams1 @charter net Subject Hillside Community Church Agenda Item Follow Up Flag Follow up Flag Status Red To: Members of the Planning Commission Regarding: Hillside Community Church Agenda Item I respectfully submit my comments to the Planning Commission for your consideration regarding the agenda item placed for June 13, 2007 I have been a resident of Rancho Cucamonga for all but one of the last 28 Years It could be said that I grew up m Rancho Cucamonga and now raise a family m Rancho Cucamonga Rancho Cucamonga is a wonderful city that is clearly motivated by raising healthy and happy children This is also the goal of Hillside Community Church In 1998 I found myself seeking a place that would help me to raise my new family and provide a moral and ethical model that I feel is critical to our future My wife located Hillside Community Church and after a few visits to the campus I saw a community of people working together for the betterment of our entire community Children's programs are my current focus and are undoubtedly the core to the Hillside Community Mission I have participated m Children's Sports, Family Events, Social Events, and mimstnes that have taken place on the campus on each and every day of the week All of these events are well Planned, Organized and Supervised I have been continually impressed by the level of attention to the success of an event and the safety of the entire community When I learned that a "Public Nuisance" Inquire had begun I was shocked I have participated m several events over the last nine years that fall far short of the term "Public Nuisance " I would like you to know how much planning takes place to minimize the effect on the neighbors and any traffic issues The hundreds of volunteers that I have worked with are cognizant of the impact of our events on the community We all feel that ~t is paramount that we provide a safe environment and care of all persons that are affected by our activity I have been a Police Officer for 15 years and now want to express my professional opinion A public nuisance is `A public nuisance is an interference with the common right of the general public or an indefinite number of persons, an unreasonable interference with the health, safety, peace, or comfort of the community " Copyright 1998-2005 David Carney, dba Tech Law Journal All rights reserved I would assert that the level planning, event coordination and history of successful events is evidence that the term public nuisance does not apply To the contrary, the events have provided a benefit to the Rancho Cucamonga Community and provided for the betterment of the general public and indefinite number of persons Yes, when you live m a residential community you must expect that a reasonable amount of sound may be heard in and around your home It is unrealistic that one could expect that complete silence is normal The community benefits from the events at Hillside Community Church I believe that the plan for Hillside Community Church approved over 20 years ago was wise The 7/17/2007 Page 2 of 2 wisdom of the members of that Planning Commission should not be reversed based upon unrealistic expectations The events at Hillside Community Church are important to our family I regret that I am unable to attend this event because of my work schedule Please feel free to contact me m the event that you require further input Christopher Williams Christopher, Brandy, Skye and Ethan Williams 14126 Henderson Dnve Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91739 (909) 463-7707 cbwilhams 1 @charter net No virus found m this outgoing message Checked by AVG Free Edition Version 7 5 472 /Virus Database 269 8 13/843 -Release Date 6/10/2007 1 39 PM 7/17/2007 Planning Commission Meeting of 7C~ RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION SIGN-UP SHEET Please print your name, address, and city and indicate the item you have spoken regarding. Thank you NAME 1. ~ l 2 3. ~~,~j4.~-~~/~I S.P~1 4. ~N~ S~oGp tia/L~ 5. /'2~1 /~C~ ~~.: fR~lr~ 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 ~1~/~%~d kxtl~,~,~ a 5, 6 2 y . Y~ ~ 22. '~ ~~ 23 24 ADDRESS CITY ITEM 'J f~~/' f~, J ~~aa ~~~N~~_ ~~~~~ ~~Q~aN~~ ~ Z~~~ ~~rp~/ ~7~ I~~ CwCr,•~o~SC. 'J ~~~ 1 R ~ ~ ~ `1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~~,~ 1 ~a Il 1~1 ~_ ~s ~ ~ / T ~~ ~® ~~-I' ~F'Lu ~'h~~ yI"I~~~ tk r~. Pr l~ 1a ~~t ~~~r~ V,`~~1C~U f-~~,57 ~S~d%s~d~ 9Q ~ ~~-~ - ~v ~~ ~~as ~~~~ ~~ ~ ~ C~-t-~- L. ~ yk ~Pr- 1~ ~ /~ l~~ C~~- ~~~~~ ~~~~~C~- /~~. ~rcJee !~ ~C~c~o