Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2002/10/29 - Agenda PacketDESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE MEETING ACTION AGENDA AND MINUTES • TUESDAY OCTOBER 29, 2002 5:00 P.M. RANCHO CYCAMONfiA CIVIC CEN*ER CONFERENCE ROOM ZOOS 10500 CIVIC CEN*ER pR1YE RANCHO CYCAMONaA Committee Members: John Mannerino Pam Stewart Alternates: Peter Tolstoy Rich Macias CONSENT CALENDAR Dan Coleman Larry McNiel The following items are expected to be routine and non-controversial. Typically they are items such as plan revisions prepared in response to discussions at a previous meeting. NO ITEMS • PROJECT REVIEW ITEMS This is the time and place for the Committee to discuss and provide direction to an applicant regarding their development application. The following items do not legally require any public testimony, although the Committee may open the meeting for public input. 5:00 p.m. (Brent) DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2002-00690 -FOREST CITY DEVELOPMENT - A request to construct approximately 500,000 square feet of retail and commercial buildings on 147 acres of land located within the limits of the Victoria Community Plan generally bounded by the future Church Street to the north, the I-15 Freeway to the east, Day Creek Boulevard to the west, and Foothill Boulevard to the south - APN: 227-201-30, 33, 35, and 36; 227-161-35, 36, and 38; 227-171-22, and 23; 227- 211-24, 39, and 40 t0 43. This project is based on the Environmental Impact Report (State Clearinghouse No. 20010301028) prepared for Development Agreement 01-02, Victoria Community Plan Amendment 01-01, and Tentative Parcel Map SUBTT15716 approved by the City Council on February 20, 2002. PUBLIC COMMENTS This is the time and place for the general public to address the Committee. State law prohibits the Committee from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Committee may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are limited to five minutes per individual. ADJOURNMENT • DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS • • 5:00 p.m. Brent Le Count October 29, 2002 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2002-00690 -FOREST CITY DEVELOPMENT - A request to construct approximately 500,000 square feet of retail and commercial buildings on 147 acres of land located within the limits of the Victoria Community Plan generally bounded by the future Church Street to the north, the I-15 Freeway to the east, Day Creek Boulevard to the west, and Foothill Boulevard to the south - APN: 227-201-30, 33, 35, and 36; 227-161-35, 36, and 38; 227-171-22, and 23; 227-211-24, 39, and 40 t0 43. This project is based on the Environmental Impact Report (State Clearinghouse No. 20010301028) prepared for Development Agreement 01-02, Victoria Community Plan Amendment 01-01, and Tentative Parcel Map SUBTT15716 approved by the City Council on February 20, 2002. Plans will be available at the meeting. Design Review Committee Action: Members Present: Pam Stewart, John Mannerino, Dan Coleman Staff Planner: Brent Le Count The applicant presented highlights from a draft Tenant Control Handbook including storefront design requirements and tenant sign limitations. The applicant also presented project graphics and way finding signs, revised Site Plan and highlights from draft design guidelines for the Route 66 area, and the corner treatment design for the intersection of Foothill Boulevard and Day Creek Boulevard. The Committee favorably commented on the various aspects of the project presented and had the following specific comments: The site monument signs are designed so that some are brick covered and some covered with fieldstone. The Committee was impressed by the overall quality; however, expressed concern for the mixture of materials. Martin Swarz, graphics consultant for the project, said that the intent is to provide variation and diversity through the use of high quality materials. By using fieldstone and brick in different locations, the sense of having the development grow over time is conveyed. 2. The Committee expressed concern about the Lexan sign reading "Victoria Gardens" to be mounted atop the project entry sign; Lexan is easily scratched and therefore subject to damage by graffiti. The applicant agreed to consider alternative sign materials to address the concern. 3. The Committee was of the opinion that there is insufficient of way finding sings and graphics relative to the rather vast parking fields. There should be more indications and clarification of the various parking areas beyond light standard-mounted parking lot identification signs. 4. Any exposed neon signs shall either be constructed with clear covering per Sign Ordinance or otherwise located in low wind areas or reinforced to guard against wind damage. Similarly, hanging blade signs shall be adequately designed to withstand high winds. • DRC COMMENTS DRC2002-00690 -FOREST CITY DEVELOPMEN • October 29, 2002 Page 2 The Committee requested that the Tenant Control Handbook establish a procedure, such as wet stamped "approved" plans that can be submitted to City, so that we know tenant has successfully obtained lessor's approval and expedite the process; however, ultimately, the City is not responsible for enforcing private rules. The Committee also expressed concern for the long-term enforcement of the criteria contained in the Tenant Control Handbook. For instance, what if the developer sells the development, how is the City assured that the new owner will follow the same criteria? There is also the concern that over time the criteria may be lesser enforced in order to please potential tenants. The applicant responded that Forest City tends to hold their properties for very long periods of time. The Tenant Control Handbook appears to only address the Phase 1 buildings and does not include the cinema, the food court building, the pad buildings along Day Creek Boulevard, etc. If the intent is to have the Handbook apply to these areas this shall be explicitly discussed in the Handbook. The Committee suggested that the applicant review some of the historic winery buildings in the area such as Masi, Virginia Dare, Thomas Winery -all have a campus style to their buildings that might translate well to the Route 66 buildings proposed. 8. There was insufficient information presented to enable the Committee to adequately comment on the Route 66 Site Plan layout. The Committee noted that the corner drive-thru • use is not allowed by the conditions of approval. The Committee also noted that pedestrian linkages are needed to integrate the area. The Committee deferred review and resolution of design matters to staff. 9. The Committee is in favor of the corner design treatment for the intersection of Foothill Boulevard and Day Creek Boulevard subject to incorporating public art as required by Day Creek Boulevard Scenic/Beautification Master Plan and Route 66 Visual Improvement Plan. The Commission expressed concern that shoppers from outside Rancho Cucamonga would have difficulty knowing where to turn. The Committee suggested that some form of project identification be provided on Foothill Boulevard to announce the presence of the Victoria Gardens. The next scheduled Committee meeting is November 5, 2002. n U DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS n LJ OCTOBER 29, 2002 PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no public comments at this time. ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 6:45 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Brad u er Secretary • • DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE MEETING TUESDAY OCTOBER 29, 2002 5:00 P.M. RANCHO CYCAMONaA CIYIi CENTER CONFERENCE ROOM 1002 10500 CIYIC CENTER ORIYE RANCHO iYCAMONGA Committee Members: John Mannerino Pam Stewart Alternates: Peter Tolstoy Rich Macias CONSENT CALENDAR Dan Coleman Larry McNiel The following items are expected to be routine and non-controversial. Typically they are items such as plan revisions prepared in response to discussions at a previous meeting. NO ITEMS PROJECT REVIEW ITEMS This is the time and place for the Committee to discuss and provide direction to an applicant regarding their development application. The following items do not legally require any public • testimony, although the Committee may open the meeting for public input. 5:00 p.m. (Brent) DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2002-00690-FOREST CITY DEVELOPMENT-A request to construct approximately 500,000 square feet of retail and commercial buildings on 147 acres of land located within the limits of the Victoria Community Plan generally bounded by the future Church Street to the north, the I-15 Freeway to the east, Day Creek Boulevard to the west, and Foothill Boulevard to the south - APN: 227-201-30, 33, 35, and 36; 227-161-35, 36, and 38; 227-171-22, and 23; 227- 211-24, 39, and 40 t0 43. This project is based on the Environmental Impact Report (State Clearinghouse No. 20010301028) prepared for Development Agreement 01-02, Victoria Community Plan Amendment 01-01, and Tentative Parcel Map SUBTT15716 approved by the City Council on February 20, 2002. PUBLIC COMMENTS This is the time and place for the general public to address the Committee. State law prohibits the Committee from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Committee may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are limited to five minutes per individual. ADJOURNMENT 1, Mary Lou Gragg, Office Specialist 11 for the City of Rancho Cucamonga, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on October 24, 2002, at least 72 hours prior to the meeting per Government Code Section 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho • Cucamonga. DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS • 5:00 p.m. Brent Le Count October 29, 2002 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2002-00690 -FOREST CITY DEVELOPMENT - A request to construct approximately 500,000 square feet of retail and commercial buildings on 147 acres of land located within the limits of the Victoria Community Plan generally bounded by the future Church Street to the north, the I-15 Freeway to the east, Day Creek Boulevard to the west, and Foothill Boulevard to the south - APN: 227-201-30, 33, 35, and 36; 227-161-35, 36, and 38; 227-171-22, and 23; 227-211-24, 39, and 40 t0 43. This project is based on the Environmental Impact Report (State Clearinghouse No. 20010301028) prepared for Development Agreement 01-02, Victoria Community Plan Amendment 01-01, and Tentative Parcel Map SUBTT15716 approved by the City Council on February 20, 2002. Plans will be available at the meeting Desion Review Committee Action: Members Present: Staff Planner: Brent Le Count • DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE MEETING ACTION AGENDA AND MINUTES • TUESDAY OCTOBER 15, 2002 7:00 P.M. RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER RAINS ROOM 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA Committee Members: John Mannerino Pam Stewart Dan Coleman Alternates: Peter Tolstoy Rich Macias Larry McNiel CONSENT CALENDAR The following items are expected to be routine and non-controversial. Typicallythey are items such as plan revisions prepared in response to discussions at a previous meeting. 7:00 p.m. (Doug) ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT SUBTT16302 - WEST CONSTRUCTION, INC. - A residential subdivision of 26single-family lots on 11 acres of land in the low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre) of the Etiwanda Specific Plan, located east of Mulberry Street and generally south of I-210 Freeway and the I-15 interchange -APN: 228-011-20, 24, 25 and 34. PROJECT REVIEW ITEMS . This is the time and place for the Committee to discuss and provide direction to an applicant regarding their development application. The following items do not legally require any public testimony, although the Committee may open the meeting for public input. 7:10 p.m (Kirt) ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2002- 00653 -RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE DEPARTMENT- A request to construct an 11,787 square foot fire station on 2.46 acres of land located in the Low-Medium District of the Victoria Community Plan, on the west side of Day Creek Boulevard between Base Line Road and the Southern Pacific Rail Road right-of-way - APN: 1089-031-18, Related File: Conditional Use Permit 91-08. 7:30 p.m. (Debra) ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 15724 SUBTT15724- KB HOME - A proposed tentative tract map consisting of 1 lot for condominium purposes and 1 lettered lot for ingress/egress, on 9.05 acres of land, within the Low-Medium Residential District (4-8 dwelling units per acre) of the Terra Vista Community Plan, located on the south side of Terra Vista Parkway between Milliken Avenue and Spruce Avenue -APN: 1077-831-32. Related File: DRC2001-00381 and DRC2002-00533 (Debra) DEVELOPMENT/DESIGN REVIEW DRC2001-00381 - KB HOME -The review of detailed site plan and building elevations for Tentative Tract 15724, consisting of 78single-family detached condominium units on 9.05 acres in the Low-Medium Residential District (4-8 dwelling units per acre) of the Terra Vista Community Plan with an actual project density of 8.6 dwelling units per acre, located on the south side • of Terra Vista Parkway between Milliken Avenue and Spruce Avenue - APN: 1077-831-32. Related File: SUBTT15724. • DRC AGENDA October 15, 2002 Page 2 7:50 p.m. ' (Rick) ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2002- 00307/SUBTT16335 -AMERICAN PACIFIC HOMES - A request to construct 120 condominium units on 8.89 acres of land in the Medium Residential District (8-14 dwelling units per acre) of the Etiwanda Specific Plan, located on the east side of East Avenue north of I-15 Freeway-APN: 227-141-14 and 66. 8:10 p.m. (Donald) ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16306- RANCHO ETIWANDA 685, LLC -A residential subdivision of 26 single-family lots on 6.85 acres of land in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre) of the Etiwanda North Specific Plan in the Rancho Etiwanda Planned Development, located at the southeast corner of Day Creek Boulevard and Vintage Drive -APN: 225-161- 76 and 77. Related File: Variance DRC2002-00592. 8:30 p.m. (Debra) ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 15923 - FOUNTAINGLEN PROPERTIES - A proposed subdivision of 2 lots on 18.54 acres in the Mixed Use MHO District (Office, Hospital and related uses) of the Terra Vista Community Plan, located at the southwest corner of Church Street and Mayten Avenue -APN: 227-151-70. Related Files: DRC2001-00633 and DRC2002-00643 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT/DESIGN REVIEW • DRC2002-00633 -FOUNTAIN GLEN PROPERTIES -The review of detailed site plan and building elevations for a proposed development of 216 market-rate apartments for seniors on 7.18 acres in the High Density Residential component (24-30 dwelling units per acre) of the MHO District (Office, Hospital and related facilities) of the Terra Vista Community Plan, located at the southwest corner of Church Street and Mayten Avenue -APN: 227-151-70. Related Files: Development Agreement DRC2002- 00643 and Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM15923. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT DRC2002- 00643 -FOUNTAIN GLEN PROPERTIES - A proposed Development Agreement associated with a proposal for 216 market-rate senior apartments in the High Density Residential component (24-30 dwelling units per acre) of the Mixed Use MHO District (Office, Hospital and related facilities) of the Terra Vista Community Plan, located at the southwest corner of Church Street and Mayten Avenue -APN: 227-151-70. Related Files: Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM15923 and DevelopmenUDesign Review DRC2002-00633 PUBLIC COMMENTS This is the time and place for the general public to address the Committee. State law prohibits the Committee from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Committee may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are limited to five minutes per individual. ADJOURNMENT • CONSENT CALENDAR COMMENTS • 7:00 p.m. Doug Fenn October 15, 2002 C~ ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT SUBTT16302 - WEST CONSTRUCTION, INC. - A residential subdivision of 26single-family lots on 11 acres of land in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre) of the Etiwanda Specific Plan, located east of Mulberry Street and generally south of I-210 Freeway and the I-15 interchange -APN: 228-011-20, 24, 25 and 34. Staff Comments: The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion: Staff has worked closely with the applicant; therefore, there are no issues that need to be discussed before the Design Review Committee. The project conforms to the Development Code. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the map be approved as proposed. Design Review Committee Action: Members Present: John Mannerino, Dan Coleman Staff Planner: Doug Fenn The Committee approved the project as proposed. I' ~ U DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 7:10 p.m. Kirt Coury October 15, 2002 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2002-00653 - RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT -A requestto constructan 11,787 square foot fire station on 2.46 acres of land located in the Low-Medium District of the Victoria Community Plan, on the west side of Day Creek Boulevard between Base Line Road and the Pacific Electric Railroad right-of-way-APN: 1089-031-18. Related File: CUP 91-08. Design Parameters: This project was previously approved as Conditional Use Permit 91-08. The design remains the same. The site is located on the west side of Day Creek Boulevard, north of Base Line Road. The site of the proposed fire station is 2.46 acres. The site is bounded to the north by an existing Southern Pacific Railroad right-of-way line and to the east by Day Creek Boulevard. Street improvements are partially complete along Day Creek Boulevard. The site is currently vacant and vegetation consists of native grass and weeds. The site is relatively flat, sloping approximately 2 to 3 percent from north to south. The fire station will take access off of a public cul-de-sac street identified as Oak Creek Court and will house three engine bays. The site will also incorporate a carport structure providing nine covered parking spaces, and a small service station building for the refueling of district vehicles. The fire station building is identified as a 24-hour emergency facility, and provides for the following amenities: living quarters for nine persons, exercise room, library, training room, and front office. The fire station building was designed to reflect elements found in both the Victoria Community Plan and the Etiwanda Specific Plan areas. The design follows basic craftsman style form and materials • utilizing exposed timbers, exposed wood truss gable roof ends, hardboard siding, river rock wainscot, multi-paned windows, wood railing at the porches, and a flat concrete file roof. The Pacific Electric Trail will be routed south along Day Creek Boulevard to cross at the signalized Oak Creek Court intersection. Also, the deceleration lane along Day Creek Boulevard shown on the plans will be eliminated. Staff Comments: The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion. Secondary Issues: Once all of the major issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues: Reduce proposed turf areas per Xeriscape principles, by using river rock fields. Policv Issues: The following items are a matter of Planning Commission policy and should be incorporated into the project design without discussion: Landscaping and pilasters along Day Creek Boulevard shall be consistent with the Day Creek Boulevard Scenic Corridor Beautification Master Plan. Pilasters are river rock with tapering sides and concrete cap. The decorative block wall proposed for the project perimeter is identified as split face block; however, all block used in the Victoria planned community is tan slump stone (pained white along Day Creek Boulevard) with a tan slump stone rowlock cap. Revise to use tan slump stone (sack finish painted white along Day Creek Boulevard). • Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the project with incorporation of the identified modifications. DRC COMMENTS DRC2002-00653 -RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROT. DIST. October 15, 2002 • Page 2 Design Review Committee Action: Members Present: John Mannerino, Dan Coleman Staff Planner: Kirt Coury The Committee recommended approval of the project subject to the mentioned secondary and policy issues. • DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS • 7:30 p.m. Debra Meier October 15, 2002 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 15724 SUBTT15724- KB HOME- Aproposed tentative tract map consisting of 1 lot for condominium purposes and 1 lettered lot for ingress/egress, on 9.05 acres of land, within the Low-Medium Residential District (4-8 dwelling units per acre) of the Terra Vista Community Plan, located on the south side of Terra Vista Parkway between Milliken Avenue and Spruce Avenue - APN: 1077-831-32. Related File: DRC2001-00381 and DRC2002-00533 DEVELOPMENT/DESIGN REVIEW DRC2001-00381 - KB HOME -The review of detailed site plan and building elevations for Tentative Tract 15724, consisting of 78 single-family detached condominium units on 9.05 acres in the Low-Medium Residential District (4-8 dwelling units per acre) of the Terra Vista Community Plan with an actual project density of 8.6 dwelling units per acre, located on the south side of Terra Vista Parkway between Milliken Avenue and Spruce Avenue - APN: 1077-831-32. Related File: SUBTT15724. Design Parameters: Tentative Tract 15724 is the only remaining undeveloped parcel in the northwest quadrant of the Terra Vista Community Plan. Surrounding land uses include single-family residential referred to as "Calais" (Tract 12671-Low-Medium) and an attached residential townhome development referred to as "Seville" (Tract 15725 -Low-Medium) along the east boundary; a single-family subdivision referred to as "Oxford" (Tract 12802 -Low-Medium) on the south side of Mountain View Drive; Coyote Canyon Park and Mountain View Apartments (Medium High) along the west boundary; and on the north side of Terra Vista Parkway is an attached duplex-style • single-family residential development referred to as "Villa Capri" (Tract 13192 -Low-Medium). The north and south boundaries of the site are formed by Terra Vista Parkway and Mountain View Drive respectively, that include curb and gutter. The site slopes gently from north to south at a 2 percent gradient. There are no trees or significant vegetation left on the site due to years of disking and weed control. The property has a General Plan designation of Low-Medium Density Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) and a Terra Vista Community Plan Amendment will be considered by the Planning Commission on October 23, 2002, to change the Terra Vista Community Plan land use designation from Elementary School (E) to Low-Medium Density residential. The proposed project is proposed at an actual density of 8.6 dwelling units per acre, which is in the range of Medium Density Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre). This flexibility is allowed in the Terra Vista Community Plan subject to review and approval of the Planning Commission and the City Council. The standards of the Medium Density Residential District will apply. Staff Comments: The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion. The following broad design issues will be.the focus of Committee discussion regarding this project: ARCHITECTURE Tentative Tract 15724 will feature the same zero-lot line product that is currently being built in Tract 16264, on Mountain View Drive east of Milliken. Staff has not suggested in modifications or revisions to the product, although the Committee is welcome to drive by the existing model complex on Tract 16264 and make any comments or recommendations. • DRC COMMENTS TT 15724/SUBTT15724 & DRC2002-00381 - KB HOME October 15, 2002 . Page 2 SITE PLAN The Mountain View Drive street scene will be similar to that of Tract 16264, with a row of units facing the street creating a very traditional street scene of quaint homes with front porches elements. The Terra Vista Parkway street scene, however, will feature the streetscape wall and landscaping similar to all other developments along the Parkway. The applicant chose this approach due to the greater degree of traffic along the parkway, making it less conducive to having the front porch accessible to the street. 2. Although guest parking is fairly well distributed throughout the site, the spaces in the northern portion of the site are concentrated along the northern-most aisle. The spaces would be generally accessible to the residents of the northern portion of the site through use of the open space trail connection. This layout is a direct result of trying to avoid placing the front doors/porches along Terra Vista Parkway (as commented above). Staff is of the opinion that the trail/walkway access provides adequate access to residents in the north portion of the site, however, as always we are open to Committee input. AMENITIES Five amenities are required for the project consisting of 78 single-family detached condominium dwellings. The following amenities are proposed: 1) picnic area with BBO facilities; 2) tot lot; 3) large open turf area (minimum dimension required of 50-feet-75-feet provided); 4) meandering . pathways through the site with access to adjacent Terra Vista trail system and Coyote Canyon Park; and, 5) a variety of seating nodes within the common open space areas. The use of brick pilasters, arbor gateways, seating nodes and other site amenity details will be the same as those used in Tract 16264. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Committee review the project in light of the comments provided and recommend review and approval by the Planning Commission. Design Review Committee Action: Members Present: John Mannerino, Dan Coleman Staff Planner: Debra Meier The Committee approved the project without further modification and recommended it be forwarded to the Planning Commission for review and action. DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS . 7:50 p.m. Rick Fisher October 15, 2002 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC ~2002- 00307/SUBTT16335/SUBTT16335 -AMERICAN PACIFIC HOMES - A request to subdivide and construct 110 condominium units on 8.89 acres of land in the Medium Residential District (8-14 dwelling units per acre) of the Etiwanda Specific Plan located on the east side of East Avenue, north of the I-15 Freeway-APN: 277-141-14 and 66. Design Parameters: The triangular shaped project site is mostly vacant with the exception of several trees and a cellular antenna tower on the south side of the property. The site is surrounded by a former Pacific Electric Railroad corridor to the north, the I-15 Freeway and off-ramp to the east and south, and single-family homes to the west across East Avenue. The proposed two-story condominiums will contain three floor plans. Two of the floor plans will contain three bedrooms and the largest floor plan will have four bedrooms. The units will range in size from 1,494 square feet to 1,790 square feet and will contain attached garages with automatic door openers. Each unit will have 276 square feet of private open space on the ground floor. The exterior of the units will resemble Craftsman design consistent with the Etiwanda Specific Plan, and will contain large roof overhangs, exposed rafter tails, large shutters around the windows, stucco covered walls, and stacked stone at the front of the buildings. The buildings will be clustered into blocks of three, four, five, and six units. Common open space and meandering sidewalk paths will separate the units. The project complies with the code requirements for private and common open space areas. Each unit provides lockable storage space within their garage consistent with City standards. . On-site amenities include multiple tot lots, a large lawn area, picnic and barbecue clusters, multi- purpose courts (basketball), a paracourse with jogging trail, bicycle storage for 14 bicycles, and a pedestrian paseo with passive seating area. A pedestrian gate on the north side of the basketball court will provide access to the former Southern Pacific Railroad right-of-way, which will become a Class Imulti-use bicycle, pedestrian trail (Pacific Electric Inland Empire Trail) in the next few years. Vehicular access to the site will be from East Avenue only. The main entrance will consist of stamped concrete, a fully landscaped median island, and a wrought iron vehicular gate. Two-way private streets will provide on-site vehicular circulation. The project requires 248 parking spaces and 259 have been provided. A 6-foot high block wall with river rock pilasters will be located on the west property line and will match the existing block wall of the tract on the west side of East street. A 15-foot high sound wall (split face) will be located along a portion of the north property line and an 18-foot high sound wall (split face on freeway side only) will be located along the east and south property lines to buffer noise from the I-15 Freeway. There is an existing cellular "monopalm" near the southwest corner of site, which will remain. A 26-foot wide turf block access easement will be provided on the south property line to allow maintenance vehicles access to the Pacific Bell cell tower. The proposed project will contain 12 units per acre, which falls in the middle of the density range allowed by the Medium Residential District (8-14 dwelling units per acre) of the Development code and the Etiwanda Specific Plan. Consistent with the City's General Plan intent for the Medium Residential zone, this project will result in an orderly transition in density and buffer between the Low- Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) density to the north and west of the site and the traffic and noise of the I-15 Freeway to the south and east. . Staff Comments: The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion. DRC COMMENTS DRC2002-00307-AMERICAN PACIFIC HOMES October 15, 2002 • Page 2 Maior Issues: The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this project: A Noise Study was prepared to examine the noise impacts the I-15 Freeway would have on the proposed condominiums. The study concluded there would be noise impacts and recommended specific construction materials be added to the units to reduce the noise impacts to a level of insignificance. In addition, sound buffering walls are required along the north, east and south property lines. These should be designed to be consistent with existing sound walls installed by the subdivision to the north. Policy Issues: The following items are a matter of Planning Commission policy and should be incorporated into the project design without discussion. Developer shall landscape and irrigate their frontage of the I-15 Freeway slope embankment or pay in-lieu of construction fees. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends Committee approval with the above-mentioned conditions. Design Review Committee Action: Members Present: John Mannerino, Dan Coleman • Staff Planner: Rick Fisher The Committee recommended approval of the project. DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS • 8:10 p.m. Donald Granger October 15, 2002 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16306 -RANCHO ETIW ANDA 685, LLC - A residential subdivision of 26 single-family lots on 6.85 acres of land in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre) of the Etiwanda North Specific Plan in the Rancho Etiwanda Planned Development, located at the southeast corner of Day Creek Boulevard and Vintage Drive - APN: 225-161-76 and 77. Related File: Variance DRC2002-00592. Design Parameters: The site falls within the Rancho Etiwanda Planned Development (previously University/Crest Project), a 1,238 residential unit development approved by the County of San Bernardino in May of 1991 and recently annexed into the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The project site is located at the southeast corner of Day Creek Boulevard and Vintage Drive. To the south is the Day Creek Boulevard westbound off-ramp for the recently opened 210 Freeway. To the east are. two single-family homes. To the north is Tract 15902, a previously approved 25-lot subdivision. The applicant is proposing only a subdivision at this time. Development of the site with single-family homes will occur at a later date. The Development Agreement for the Rancho Etiwanda area provides fora 26 lot single-family subdivision at this location. The design of proposed Tentative Tract Map16306 is in substantial compliance with the subdivision design indicated in the Development Agreement. Due to the proximity of the 210 Freeway, a sound wall up to 8.5 feet in height will be required to be constructed around a majority of the subdivision's boundary. The applicant is concurrently processing a Variance for the wall necessary perimeter wall height. Final • location and design of the perimeter wall will be reviewed when an application for development of the subdivision is filed at a later date. Staff Comments: The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion. Maior Issues: The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this project: Major design issues have been addressed through the Development Agreement and discussions with staff. There are no major issues. Secondary Issues: Once all of the major issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues: The applicant has resolved all secondary issues with staff. Policv Issues: The following items are a matter of Planning Commission policy and should be incorporated into the project design without discussion: Decorative perimeter walls shall be provided along the tract's boundaries and along streets. Perimeter walls fronting Day Creek Boulevard and Vintage Drive shall adhere to the approved wall design and materials palette for Day Creek Boulevard and Rancho Etiwanda, including, but not limited to river rock pilasters. 2. Perimeter walls shall be at top of slope, with a 2-foot bench. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Design Review Committee recommend approval of the project subject to the above comments DRC COMMENTS SUBTT16306 -RANCHO ETIWANDA 685, LLC • October 15, 2002 Page 2 Design Review Committee Action: Members Present: John Mannerino, Dan Coleman Staff Planner: Donald Granger The Committee reviewed the project and recommended approval. • n U DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS • 8:30 p.m. Debra Meier October 15, 2002 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 15923 -FOUNTAIN GLEN PROPERTIES - A proposed subdivision of 2 lots on 18.54 acres in the Mixed Use MHO District (Office, Hospital and related uses) of the Terra Vista Community Plan, located at the southwest corner of Church Street and Mayten Avenue -APN: 227-151-70. Related Files: DRC2001-00633 and DRC2002-00643 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT/DESIGN REVIEW DRC2002-00633 - FOUNTAIN GLEN PROPERTIES -The review of detailed site plan and building elevations for a proposed development of 216 market-rate apartments for seniors on 7.18 acres in the High Density Residential component (24-30 dwelling units per acre) of the MHO District (Office, Hospital and related facilities) of the Terra Vista Community Plan, located at the southwest corner of Church Street and Mayten Avenue - APN: 227-151-70. Related Files: Development Agreement DRC2002-00643 and Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM15923. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT DRC2002-00643 - FOUNTAIN GLEN PROPERTIES - A proposed Development Agreement associated with a proposal for 216 market-rate senior apartments in the High Density Residential component (24-30 dwelling units per acre) of the Mixed Use MHO District (Office, Hospital and related facilities) of the Terra Vista Community Plan, located at the southwest corner of Church Street and Mayten Avenue -APN: 227-151-70. Related Files: Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM15923 and DevelopmenUDesign Review DRC2002-00633 • Background: The Fountain Glen Senior Apartment project was before the Design Review Committee on September 17, 2002, including Larry Mc Neil, Pam Stewart, and Dan Coleman. A summary of the items discussed at that meeting included the following: • Design details of the building entry; • Overall building details and color schemes, including the use of a masonry or stone accent material at key locations; The discussion of garages versus carports, and carport design; and • The results of the Traffic Generation/Parking Analysis and the provision of parking within the proposed project at a rate of 1.2 spaces per dwelling unit. The Complete Design Review Comments and Action are attached for your reference. The applicant has now requested time with the Committee to further discuss the provision of garages within the project. They would like the opportunity to express to the Committee the characteristics of typical residents and the amenities provided at their many similar projects in Southern California. Occupancy data of several Fountain Glen properties are attached for reference. No plans are being distributed with this agenda. However, should any Committee member require an additional set of plans to prepare for this discussion please contact the project planner. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Committee allow the applicant the opportunity for a presentation of information as desired; and provide guidance to the applicant regarding further review and processions. DRC COMMENTS TPM15923, DRC2002-00633, DRC2002-00643 -FOUNTAIN GLEN PROPERTIES October 15, 2002 • Page 2 Design Review Committee Action: Members Present: John Mannerino, Dan Coleman Staff Planner: Debra Meier The applicant reviewed with the Committee their response to the previous Design Review Committee comments pertaining to garages and carports. The applicant has proposed the use of 50 garage spaces and 40 carport spaces. The effect of adding the garages to the site plan results in a decrease of approximately 8 parking spaces, the ratio therefore declines from 1.2 spaces per unit to 1.15 spaces per unit. The applicant has proposed parking at the following ratio: Total of 250 spaces - at a ratio 1.15 spaces per unit (including resident, guest and employee parking needs). Of the total, 90 spaces are "covered" (36 percent of total); with 50 garage spaces (20 percent of total), and 40 carport spaces (16 percent of total). The Development Code would typically require this project to provide the following parking count • 1.5 spaces for each one-bedroom unit - 108 x 1.5 = 162 1.8 spaces for each two-bedroom unit - 108 x 1.8 = 195 0.25 space per unit for guest parking - 216 x 0.25 = 54 TOTAL REQUIRED PARKING PER DEVELOPMENT CODE-411 The total would include a minimum of 216 "covered" spaces (one required for each unit) (52.5 percent of total), and a minimum of 108 within garages (50 percent of all "covered" spaces) (26 percent of total). The Committee agreed in concept to the parking calculations and the provision of covered parking as proposed by the applicant. The applicant also reviewed the remaining design items for the Committee, including the design of the carport, and the additional use of stone through the project as previously directed. With these revisions, the Committee recommended that the project proceed to the Planning Commission for review and action. • DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS • OCTOBER 15, 2002 PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no public comments at this time. ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 8:30 p.m. Respecttully submitted, Brad' uller Secretary U CJ DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE MEETING •~ TUESDAY OCTOBER 15, 2002 7:00 P.M. RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER RAINS ROOM 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA Committee Members: John Mannerino Pam Stewart Alternates: Peter Tolstoy Rich Macias CONSENT CALENDAR Dan Coleman Larry McNiel The following items are expected to be routine and non-controversial. Typically they are items such as plan revisions prepared in response to discussions at a previous meeting. 7:00 p.m. (Doug) ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT SUBTT16302 - WEST CONSTRUCTION, INC. - A residential subdivision of 26single-family lots on 11 acres of land in the low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre) of the Etiwanda Specific Plan, located east of Mulberry Street and generally south of I-210 Freeway and the I-15 interchange -APN: 228-011-20, 24, 25 and 34. • PROJECT REVIEW ITEMS This is the time and place for the Committee to discuss and provide direction to an applicant regarding their development application. The following items do not legally require any public testimony, although the Committee may open the meeting for public input. 7:10 p.m. (Kirt) ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2002- 00653 - RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE DEPARTMENT-A request to construct an 11,787 square foot fire station on 2.46 acres of land located in the Low-Medium District of the Victoria Community Plan, on the west side of Day Creek Boulevard between Base Line Road and the Southern Pacific Rail Road right-of-way - APN: 1089-031-18, Related File: Conditional Use Permit 91-08. 7:30 p.m. (Debra) ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 15724 SUBTT15724- KB HOME - A proposed tentative tract map consisting of 1 lot for condominium purposes and 1 lettered lot for ingress/egress, on 9.05 acres of land, within the Low-Medium Residential District (4-8 dwelling units per acre) of the Terra Vista Community Plan, located on the south side of Terra Vista Parkway between Milliken Avenue and Spruce Avenue -APN: 1077-831-32. Related File: DRC2001-00381 and DRC2002-00533 (Debra) DEVELOPMENT/DESIGN REVIEW DRC2001-00381 - KB HOME -The review of detailed site plan and building elevations for Tentative Tract 15724, consisting of 78 single-family detached condominium units on 9.05 acres in the Low-Medium Residential District (4-8 dwelling units per acre) of the Terra Vista Community Plan with an actual project density of 8.6 dwelling units per acre, located on the south side of Terra Vista Parkway between Milliken Avenue and Spruce Avenue - APN: 1077-831-32. Related File: SUBTT15724. • DRC AGENDA October 15, 2002 Page 2 7:50 p.m. (Rick) ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2002- 00307/SUBTT16335 -AMERICAN PACIFIC HOMES - A request to construct 120 condominium units on 8.89 acres of land in the Medium Residential District (8-14 dwelling units per acre) of the Etiwanda Specific Plan, located on the east side of East Avenue north of I-15 Freeway -APN: 227-141-14 and 66. 8:10 p.m. (Donald) ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16306- RANCHO ETIWANDA 685, LLC - A residential subdivision of 26single-family lots on 6.85 acres of land in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre) of the Etiwanda North Specific Plan in the Rancho Etiwanda Planned Development, located at the southeast corner of Day Creek Boulevard and Vintage Drive -APN: 225-161- 76 and 77. Related File: Variance DRC2002-00592. 8:30 p.m. (Debra) ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 15923 - FOUNTAINGLEN PROPERTIES - A proposed subdivision of 2 lots on 18.54 acres in the Mixed Use MHO District (Office, Hospital and related uses) of the Terra Vista Community Plan, located at the southwest corner of Church Street and Mayten Avenue-APN: 227-151-70. Related Files: DRC2001-00633 andDRC2002-00643 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT/DESIGN REVIEW DRC2002-00633 -FOUNTAIN GLEN PROPERTIES -The reviewof detailed site plan and building elevations for a proposed development of 216 market-rate apartments for seniors on 7.18 acres in the High Density Residential component (24-30 dwelling units per acre) of the MHO District (Office, Hospital and related facilities) of the Terra Vista Community Plan, located at the southwest corner of Church Street and Mayten Avenue -APN: 227-151-70. Related Files: Development Agreement DRC2002- 00643 and Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM15923. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT DRC2002- 00643 -FOUNTAIN GLEN PROPERTIES - A proposed Development Agreement associated with a proposal for 216 market-rate senior apartments in the High Density Residential component (24-30 dwelling units per acre) of the Mixed Use MHO District (Office, Hospital and related facilities) of the Terra Vista Community Plan, located at the southwest corner of Church Street and Mayten Avenue -APN: 227-151-70. Related Files: Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM15923 and DevelopmenUDesign Review DRC2002-00633 PUBLIC COMMENTS This is the time and place for the general public to address the Committee. State law prohibits the Committee from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Committee may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are limited to five minutes per individual. I.J DRC AGENDA •- October 15, 2002 Page 3 ADJOURNMENT 1, Mary Lou Gragg, Office Specialist 11 for the City of Rancho Cucamonga, hereby certi/y that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on October 10, 2002, at least 72 hours prior to the meeting per Government Code Section 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Ce er Drive, Rancho Cucamonga. r\L ~ ` ~. CONSENT CALENDAR COMMENTS • 7:00 p.m. Doug Fenn October 15, 2002 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT SUBTT16302 - WEST CONSTRUCTION, INC. -A residential subdivision of 26single-family lots on 11 acres of land in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre) of the Etiwanda Specific Plan, located east of Mulberry Street and generally south of I-210 Freeway and the I-15 interchange-APN: 228-011-20, 24, 25 and 34. Staff Comments: The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion: Staff has worked closely with the applicant; therefore, there are no issues that need to be discussed before the Design Review Committee. The project conforms to the Development Code. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the map be approved as proposed. Design Review Committee Action: Members Present: Staff Planner: Doug Fenn DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS • 7:10 p.m. Kirt Coury October 15, 2002 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2002-00653 - RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT- A request to construct an 11,787 square foot fire station on 2.46 acres of land located in the Low-Medium District of the Victoria Community Plan, on the west side of Day Creek Boulevard between Base Line Road and the Pacific Electric Railroad right-of-way-APN: 1089-031-18. Related File: CUP 91-08. Design Parameters: This project was previously approved as Conditional Use Permit 91-08. The design remains the same. The site is located on the west side of Day Creek Boulevard, north of Base Line Road. The site of the proposed fire station is 2.46 acres. The site is bounded to the north by an existing Southern Pacific Railroad right-of-way line and to the east by Day Creek Boulevard. Street improvements are partially complete along Day Creek Boulevard. The site is currently vacant and vegetation consists of native grass and weeds. The site is relatively flat, sloping approximately 2 to 3 percent from north to south. The fire station will take access off of a public cul-de-sac street identified as Oak Creek Court and will house three engine bays. The site will also incorporate a carport structure providing nine covered parking spaces, and a small service station building for the refueling of district vehicles. The fire station building is identified as a 24-hour emergency facility, and provides for the following amenities: living quarters for nine persons, exercise room, library, training room, and front office. The fire station building was designed to reflect elements found in both the Victoria Community Plan and the Etiwanda Specific Plan areas. The design follows basic craftsman style form and materials . utilizing exposed timbers, exposed wood truss gable roof ends, hardboard siding, river rock wainscot, multi-paned windows, wood railing at the porches, and a flat concrete file roof. The Pacific Electric Trail will be routed south along Day Creek Boulevard to cross at the signalized Oak Creek Court intersection. Also, the deceleration lane along Day Creek Boulevard shown on the plans will be eliminated. Staff Comments: The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion. Secondary Issues: Once all of the major issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues: Reduce proposed turf areas per Xeriscape principles, by using river rock fields. Policv Issues: The following items are a matter of Planning Commission policy and should be incorporated into the project design without discussion: Landscaping and pilasters along Day Creek Boulevard shall be consistent with the Day Creek Boulevard Scenic Corridor Beautification Master Plan. Pilasters are river rock with tapering sides and concrete cap. The decorative block wall proposed for the project perimeter is identified as split face block; however, all block used in the Victoria planned community is tan slump stone (pained white along Day Creek Boulevard) with a tan slump stone rowlock cap. Revise to use tan slump stone (sack finish painted white along Day Creek Boulevard). Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the project with incorporation of the identified modifications. DRC COMMENTS DRC2002-00653 - RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROT. DIST. October 15, 2002 • Page 2 Design Review Committee Action: Members Present: Staff Planner: Kirt Coury U DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS • 7:30 p.m. Debra Meier October 15, 2002 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 15724 SUBTT15724- KB HOME- Aproposed tentative tract map consisting of 1 lot for condominium purposes and 1 lettered lot for ingress/egress, on 9.05 acres of land, within the Low-Medium Residential District (4-8 dwelling units per acre) of the Terra Vista Community Plan, located on the south side of Terra Vista Parkway between Milliken Avenue and Spruce Avenue - APN: 1077-831-32. Related File: DRC2001-00381 and DRC2002-00533 DEVELOPMENT/DESIGN REVIEW DRC2001-00381 -KB HOME -The review of detailed site plan and building elevations for Tentative Tract 15724, consisting of 78 single-family detached condominium units on 9.05 acres in the Low-Medium Residential District (4-8 dwelling units per acre) of the Terra Vista Community Plan with an actual project density of 8.6 dwelling units per acre, located on the south side of Terra Vista Parkway between Milliken Avenue and Spruce Avenue - APN: 1077-831-32. Related File: SUBTT15724. Design Parameters: Tentative Tract 15724 is the only remaining undeveloped parcel in the northwest quadrant of the Terra Vista Community Plan. Surrounding land uses include single-family residential referred to as "Calais" (Tract 12671-Low-Medium) and an attached residential townhome development referred to as "Seville" (Tract 15725 -Low-Medium) along the east boundary; a single-family subdivision referred to as "Oxford" (Tract 12802 -Low-Medium) on the south side of Mountain View Drive; Coyote Canyon Park and Mountain View Apartments (Medium High) along the west boundary; and on the north side of Terra Vista Parkway is an attached duplex-style • single-family residential development referred to as "Villa Capri" (Tract 13192 -Low-Medium). The north and south boundaries of the site are formed by Terra Vista Parkway and Mountain View Drive respectively, that include curb and gutter. The site slopes gently from north to south at a 2 percent gradient. There are no trees or significant vegetation left on the site due to years of disking and weed control. The property has a General Plan designation of Low-Medium Density Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) and a Terra Vista Community Plan Amendment will be considered by the Planning Commission on October 23, 2002, to change the Terra Vista Community Plan land use designation from Elementary School (E) to Low-Medium Density residential. The proposed project is proposed at an actual density of 8.6 dwelling units per acre, which is in the range of Medium Density Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre). This flexibility is allowed in the Terra Vista Community Plan subject to review and approval of the Planning Commission and the City Council. The standards of the Medium Density Residential District will apply. Staff Comments: The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion. The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this project: ARCHITECTURE Tentative Tract 15724 will feature the same zero-lot line product that is currently being built in Tract 16264, on Mountain View Drive east of Milliken. Staff has not suggested in modifications or revisions to the product, although the Committee is welcome to drive by the existing model complex on Tract 16264 and make any comments or recommendations. DRC COMMENTS TT 15724/SUBTT15724 & DRC2002-00381 - KB HOME October 15, 2002 • Page 2 SITE PLAN The Mountain View Drive street scene will be similar to that of Tract 16264, with a row of units facing the street creating a very traditional street scene of quaint homes with front porches elements. The Terra Vista Parkway street scene, however, will feature the streetscape wall and landscaping similar to all other developments along the Parkway. The applicant chose this approach due to the greater degree of traffic along the parkway, making it less conducive to having the front porch accessible to the street. 2. Although guest parking is fairly well distributed throughout the site, the spaces in the northern portion of the site are concentrated along the northern-most aisle. The spaces would be generally accessible to the residents of the northern portion of the site through use of the open space trail connection. This layout is a direct result of trying to avoid placing the front doors/porches along Terra Vista Parkway (as commented above). Staff is of the opinion that the trail/walkway access provides adequate access to residents in the north portion of the site, however, as always we are open to Committee input. AMENITIES Five amenities are required for the project consisting of 78 single-family detached condominium dwellings. The following amenities are proposed: 1) picnic area with BBO facilities; 2) tot lot; 3) large open turf area (minimum dimension required of 50-feet-75-feet provided); 4) meandering pathways through the site with access to adjacent Terra Vista trail system and Coyote Canyon Park; and, 5) a variety of seating nodes within the common open space areas. The use of brick pilasters, arbor gateways, seating nodes and other site amenity details will be the same as those used in Tract 16264. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Committee review the project in light of the comments provided and recommend review and approval by the Planning Commission. Design Review Committee Action: Members Present: Staff Planner: Debra Meier DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 7:50 p.m. Rick Fisher October 15, 2002 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC 2002- 00307/SUBTT16335/SUBTT16335 -AMERICAN PACIFIC HOMES - A request to subdivide and construct 110 condominium units on 8.89 acres of land in the Medium Residential District (8-14 dwelling units per acre) of the Etiwanda Specific Plan located on the east side of East Avenue, north of the I-15 Freeway - APN: 277-141-14 and 66. Design Parameters: The triangular shaped project site is mostly vacant with the exception of several trees and a cellular antenna tower on the south side of the property. The site is surrounded by a former Pacific Electric Railroad corridor to the north, the I-15 Freeway and off-ramp to the east and south, and single-family homes to the west across East Avenue. The proposed two-story condominiums will contain three floor plans. Two of the floor plans will contain three bedrooms and the largest floor plan will have four bedrooms. The units will range in size from 1,494 square feet to 1,790 square feet and will contain attached garages with automatic door openers. Each unit will have 276 square feet of private open space on the ground floor. The exterior of the units will resemble Craftsman design consistent with the Etiwanda Specific Plan, and will contain large roof overhangs, exposed rafter tails, large shutters around the windows, stucco covered walls, and stacked stone at the front of the buildings. The buildings will be clustered into blocks of three, four, five, and six units. Common open space and meandering sidewalk paths will separate the units. The project complies with the code requirements for private and common open space areas. Each unit provides lockable storage space within their garage consistent with City standards. • On-site amenities include multiple tot lots, a large lawn area, picnic and barbecue clusters, multi- purpose courts (basketball), a paracourse with jogging trail, bicycle storage for 14 bicycles, and a pedestrian paseo with passive seating area. A pedestrian gate on the north side of the basketball court will provide access to the former Southern Pacific Railroad right-of-way, which will become a Class Imulti-use bicycle, pedestrian trail (Pacific Electric Inland Empire Trail) in the next few years. Vehicular access to the site will be from East Avenue only. The main entrance will consist of stamped concrete, a fully landscaped median island, and a wrought iron vehicular gate. Two-way private streets will provide on-site vehicular circulation. The project requires 248 parking spaces and 259 have been provided. A 6-foot high block wall with river rock pilasters will be located on the west property line and will match the existing block wall of the tract on the west side of East street. A 15-foot high sound wall (split face) will be located along a portion of the north property line and an 18-foot high sound wall (split face on freeway side only) will be located along the east and south property lines to buffer noise from the I-15 Freeway. There is an existing cellular "monopalm" near the southwest corner of site, which will remain. A 26-foot wide turf block access easement will be provided on the south property line to allow maintenance vehicles access to the Pacific Bell cell tower. The proposed project will contain 12 units per acre, which falls in the middle of the density range allowed by the Medium Residential District (8-14 dwelling units per acre) of the Development code and the Etiwanda Specific Plan. Consistent with the City's General Plan intent for the Medium Residential zone, this project will result in an orderly transition in density and buffer between the Low- Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) density to the north and west of the site and the traffic and noise of the I-15 Freeway to the south and east. • Staff Comments: The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion. DRC COMMENTS DRC2002-00307 -AMERICAN PACIFIC HOMES October 15, 2002 • Page 2 Maior Issues: The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this project: 1. A Noise Study was prepared to examine the noise impacts the I-15 Freeway would have on the proposed condominiums. The study concluded there would be noise impacts and recommended specific construction materials be added to the units to reduce the noise impacts to a level of insignificance. In addition, sound buffering walls are required along the north, east and south property lines. These should be designed to be consistent with existing sound walls installed by the subdivision to the north. Policy Issues: The following items are a matter of Planning Commission policy and should be incorporated into the project design without discussion. 1. Developer shall landscape and irrigate theirfrontage of the I-15 Freeway slope embankment or pay in-lieu of construction fees. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends Committee approval with the above-mentioned conditions. Design Review Committee Action: Members Present: • Staff Planner: Rick Fisher • DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS • 8:10 p.m. Donald Granger October 15, 2002 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16306 -RANCHO ETIWANDA 685, LLC - A residential subdivision of 26 single-family lots on 6.85 acres of land in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre) of the Etiwanda North Specific Plan in the Rancho Etiwanda Planned Development, located at the southeast corner of Day Creek Boulevard and Vintage Drive - APN: 225-161-76 and 77. Related File: Variance DRC2002-00592. Design Parameters: The site falls within the Rancho Etiwanda Planned Development (previously University/Crest Project), a 1,238 residential unit development approved by the County of San Bernardino in May of 1991 and recently annexed into the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The project site is located at the southeast corner of Day Creek Boulevard and Vintage Drive. To the south is the Day Creek Boulevard westbound off-ramp forthe recently opened 210 Freeway. To the east are two single-family homes. To the north is Tract 15902, a previously approved 25-lot subdivision. The applicant is proposing only a subdivision at this time. Development of the site with single-family homes will occur at a later date. The Development Agreement for the Rancho Etiwanda area provides fora 26 lot single-family subdivision at this location. The design of proposed Tentative Tract Map16306 is in substantial compliance with the subdivision design indicated in the Development Agreement. Due to the proximity of the 210 Freeway, a sound wall up to 8.5 feet in height will be required to be constructed around a majority of the subdivision's boundary. The applicant is concurrently processing a Variance for the wall necessary perimeter wall height. Final location and design of the perimeter wall will be reviewed when an application for development of the subdivision is filed at a later date. Staff Comments: The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion. Maior Issues: The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this project: Major design issues have been addressed through the Development Agreement and discussions with staff. There are no major issues. Secondary Issues: Once all of the major issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues: The applicant has resolved all secondary issues with staff. Policv Issues: The following items are a matter of Planning Commission policy and should be incorporated into the project design without discussion: Decorative perimeter walls shall be provided along the tract's boundaries and along streets. Perimeter walls fronting Day Creek Boulevard and Vintage Drive shall adhere to the approved wall design and materials palette for Day Creek Boulevard and Rancho Etiwanda, including, but not limited to river rock pilasters. 2. Perimeter walls shall be at top of slope, with a 2_foot bench. • Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Design Review Committee recommend approval of the project subject to the above comments DRC COMMENTS SUBTT16306 -RANCHO ETIWANDA 685, LLC October 15, 2002 Page 2 Design Review Committee Action: Members Present: Staff Planner: Donald Granger DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 8:30 p.m. ~ Debra Meier October 15, 2002 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 15923 -FOUNTAIN GLEN PROPERTIES - A proposed subdivision of 2 lots on 18.54 acres in the Mixed Use MHO District (Office, Hospital and related uses) of the Terra Vista Community Plan, located at the southwest corner of Church Street and Mayten Avenue -APN: 227-151-70. Related Files: DRC2001-00633 and DRC2002-00643 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT/DESIGN REVIEW DRC2002-00633 - FOUNTAIN GLEN PROPERTIES -The review of detailed site plan and building elevations for a proposed development of 216 market-rate apartments for seniors on 7.18 acres in the High Density Residential component (24-30 dwelling units per acre) of the MHO District (Office, Hospital and related facilities) of the Terra Vista Community Plan, located at the southwest corner of Church Street and Mayten Avenue - APN: 227-151-70. Related Files: Development Agreement DRC2002-00643 and Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM15923. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT DRC2002-00643 - FOUNTAIN GLEN PROPERTIES - A proposed Development Agreement associated with a proposal for 216 market-rate senior apartments in the High Density Residential component (24-30 dwelling units per acre) of the Mixed Use MHO District (Office, Hospital and related facilities) of the Terra Vista Community Plan, located at the southwest corner of Church Street and Mayten Avenue -APN: 227-151-70. Related Files: Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM15923 and Development/Design Review DRC2002-00633 Background: The Fountain Glen Senior Apartment project was before the Design Review Committee on September 17, 2002, including Larry Mc Neil, Pam Stewart, and Dan Coleman. A summary of the items discussed at that meeting included the following: • Design details of the building entry; • Overall building details and color schemes, including the use of a masonry or stone accent material at key locations; • The discussion of garages versus carports, and carport design; and • The results of the Traffic Generation/Parking Analysis and the provision of parking within the proposed project at a rate of 1.2 spaces per dwelling unit. The Complete Design Review Comments and Action are attached for your reference. The applicant has now requested time with the Committee to further discuss the provision of garages within the project. They would like the opportunity to express to the Committee the characteristics of typical residents and the amenities provided at their many similar projects in Southern California. Occupancy data of several Fountain Glen properties are attached for reference. No plans are being distributed with this agenda. However, should any Committee member require an additional set of plans to prepare for this discussion please contact the project planner. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Committee allow the applicant the opportunity for a presentation of information as desired; and provide guidance to the applicant regarding further review and processions. DRC COMMENTS TPM15923, DRC2002-00633, DRC2002-00643 -FOUNTAIN GLEN PROPERTIES October 15, 2002 • Page 2 Attachments Design Review Committee Action: Members Present: Staff Planner: Debra Meier • I~ U • ,~ ~/ u `r ~, u ~ ~ o ~~~~ o ~ ~ , z cn ~ ~' o 0 o y o Z d ~ d m w d m G) > (/~ d ~ = N r f/~ fA N f /~ m ~ ~ Z ~ m ~ ~ O m ~mmD~~cn-i Zl ~ ~ ~ n m ~ > > m ~ o m 0 0~ c o s ~ ~ C /~ ~ o a°-°- '9 c ~ 55 0 0 0 2 N O O D N - O ~ m a ~ n m r N ~ ~ m m m > N N W N N C~ O O v ~ v N N (n A 01 W A W Cn O) (O O m A A N N C phi m cn ~D 00 cn ° '' ' ~ ~~ ~ N ~ Z11 IV W N A j>» N N~ O A N W W (T N W 01 ~ (D N ~ - ~ _ r > > ~ ~ r > > ~ N (~ N N W N N O O N N O- j A U1 N W t0 (O (J~ O (O j N z _ W ~> O~ A W W A c 3 O W OD OD N O 01 tD Ut Q (D ~ O A v ~ J O) ~ O» N O ~p ~~ T ~ ~ n m 0 > N> N N~~ » N~ A N O ~ N J t D N ? C N ~. N ~> (D O N O O> N C A ~I A O W (D A N O ~ Z A c0 W O N A O W N (O ~ W O J OD J O U~ (O Q (D N O N N O O O O v O O 61 O C .. N :0 ~' (D O j (n O W O N N> 0 N O a~ N 0 (O V (O ? C N ~. N > O > ~ (n Cn N CT (fi 0 0 W A C O O> m (P O J OD (I~ T O C ~ O Z d y fn ~ p Z ~,a ~ ~ G~ ~~ ~ r N ~ ~ D m Z N ,~ ~ N oc a m 0 N ~ ~ ~ m N ~ m ~ ~ OrZ -1 3~~D-i vim DOT b ~ m co ° °^ ° ~ 3 'm m > > y 3 °c o ~ ~ ~ y ~ ~ n ~ ~ ~~ d • x ~ s~ . o ~ m ~_ . m ~ ` o m v ~' c a -a m ~ = D ~ m ~ O m m~ ~ m m °' ~D~ C ~ ~ ~' ~ m ~ d mo ~ w - o c n _ ~ Z ~ o ~ m _ ~ N (/7 O ~ O N () N n O. O (D = C ~ ~ ~J J N ~ J J 0 0 0 0 0 fD O O W A 0 [ 0 0 t 0 ( ( 0 ( N_ Z _ ~ V1 ~~ N ~ N N~ N '' O ~ (,n O O ~ Cn W N t0 W O o _F ~ O O) Gn t0 c0 A t0 W A ~ U1 p 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (D ~ T 01 C_ O ~ l7 W N A W O O O) A~ N p D O fD _ O) W O) N I O m ~ 3 ~ o ~ ~ ~ m ~ Q1 O ~ N CT N N OD W N A (D ~ O n N O . • _ .. ~ ~ W N N N N~~ _ W N O W OI ~ A W N (li O) N t0 W pp W N N N W N~ -~ S O W Ou OJ m 0 OD O Qp ~ W W A N~ O) N ~ 0 0 p m 0 0 0 0 0 O O C 7 p ' VI ~ N N N N N ~~ 01 W OD ~ ~ Ot CT O) O n A O U~ f0 (T1 W~ J~ A n O C W J ~ O Cn A O) OI N N N ~ O N N 01 W~ W m J r ~ .... r ~ N r ~ N OI V (O O W W y W Q) O ~I V O O A OI ~I C7 O N _ _ W N N N N C J J W N J N A 0 0 O) _ ~ ~ A ~I O O O W W I Ul N 0 o a o 0 0 0 0 0 o N ~ 7 (q N • ~ J W W W J J O _ O ~ N N 71 ( D D W ( O (p O) W 0 0 0 ~I A (D cn N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 7:00 p.m. Debra Meier September 17, 2002 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT/DESIGN REVIEW DRC2002-00633 - FOUNTAINGLEN PROPERTIES -The review of detailed site plan and building elevations for a proposal to develop 216 market-rate apartments for seniors on 7.18 acres in the High Density Residential component (24-30 dwelling units per acre) of the MHO District (Office, Hospital and related facilities) of the Terra Vista Community Plan, located at the southwest comer of Church Street and Mayten Avenue - APN: 227-151-70. Related Files: Development Agreement DRC2002-00643 and Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM15923. Design Parameters: The project is located in the southeast quadrant of the Terra Vista Community Plan. Surrounding land uses include the proposed Homecoming master plan by Lewis Apartment Communities on the north side of Church Street; and a vacant parcel designated Medium-High Residential on the east side of.Mayten Avenue. The site is located in the Mixed Use MHO District (Office, Hospital and related uses), which includes a High Density Residential component (24-30 dwelling units per acre). The MHO district encompasses the entire block bound by Foothill Boulevard on the south, Church Street on the north, Mayten Avenue on the east, and Milliken Avenue on the west. The San Antonio Medical Center is located at the southeast comer of Church Street and Milliken Avenue and a vacant parcel south of the site, that is also a component of the Mixed Use MHO District, that will require a future Master Plan for commercial and/or office site development. Senior apartments developed at this location would have access to the adjacent medical facility along with the commercial development along Foothill Boulevard, along with the trails and open space system that is an integral component of the Terra Vista Community Plan. • The project includes recreational amenities designed for seniors including on-site walkways, a putting green, pool and spa, outdoor dining and bar-be-cue facilities, along with indoor community rooms (library, exercise, computer center, TV, and billiards). Associated with the DevelopmenUDesign Review application is a proposed Development Agreement to establish parking at a rate of 0.95 spaces per dwelling unit, and in tum, establish the project as a senior apartment facility for the life of the project. Special Note: There are apparent inconsistencies indrawings between Elevations and Floor Plans that may affect the exterior elevations. Staff has informed the applicant and requested revised plans to be brought to meeting for clarification. Staff Comments: The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion. Maior Issues: The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this project: 1. The project entry from Mayten Avenue views the primary building entry, which enters into the resident common use areas. This portion of the building elevation should make a significantly stronger statement and that will create interest and attention. 2. Enhance the elevations of the second and third floors above the primary building entry. Note: the small windows shown on the elevation do not appear on Floor Plans. In addition to the • windows, staff would recommend that more architectural features be added to enhance this important portion of the building. Incorporate the use of a stone base or similar material to enhance to building style and design. 3. Consider using atwo-tone color scheme, with darker color on lower floor, to help break up 3-4 story building mass. Color may be from stone base. DRC COMMENTS • DRC2002-00633 - FOUNTAINGLEN PROPERTIES September 17, 2002 Page 2 4. Increase building setback to garages along Rancho San Antonio Medical center's entry driveway at the west project boundary from 5 feet to 15 feet. The Cites multi-family development standards require a 15-foot building to curb setback for High Residential density. 5. Provide elevations of carports. Design shall follow City's multi-family guidelines: "Carport structures should exhibit designs which are compatible, supportive, and fully integrated into the overall architectural theme as implemented through the following provisions: 'Flimsy,' 'stick-like' carport designs which portray and add-on, non-permanent perception are not desirable characteristics of a parking area. Substantial design elements should be integrated into the structure to convey a more permanent concept for the carports.° For example, the carports should have a file roof. Secondary Issues: Once all of the major issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues: 1. Provide direct pedestrian access (i.e., sidewalk connection) at project entrance from public sidewalk on Mayten Street to the main building entry. 2. Provide direct pedestrian access to the medical center from within the project near the fire • access. The sidewalk shown at the northwest corner of site is not desirable because of grade differential causing stairs. Use decorative paving across drive-aisle. 3. Provide elevations of the carports for Committee review and approval. 4. Incorporate decorative pilasters in perimeter fence, at least every 100 feet on center, along street frontages. 5. The 9-foot high wall (6-foot garden wall atop a 3-foot retaining wall) along southerly project boundary requires review and approval of a Variance application. No Variance application has been submitted to date. An alternative to a Variance would be to terrace walls by placing retaining wall at property line and garden wall on top of slope. Stall Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Committee review and respond to the design comments, and direct the applicant to work out issues with staff before forwarding the project to Commission for review and approval. Design Review Committee Action: Members Present: Larry McNiel,Pam Stewart, Dan Coleman Staff Planner: Debra Meier The applicant presented to the Committee revised plans that responded to several of the comments raised by staff. The first issue discussed was the proposed revisions to the Mayten Street entry focal point. Here the applicant has redesigned the entry to create a rotunda tower that creates a much more dramatic focal point. The applicant has also added the use of stone at the building entry and as a wainscot to columns on the colonnade. The Committee approved the proposed building design, however, they also requested that the applicant include stone on pilasters used for the perimeter fencing, at any area where special treatment is required, such as the corner monument and the entry gates, as well as in community outdoor use areas of special importance, such as the fencing/pilasters surrounding the pool and as accent features in the outdoor dining area. ^, DRC COMMENTS ~ • DRC2002-00633 - FOUNTAINGLEN PROPERTIES September 17, 2002 . Page 3 The applicant has submitted an analysis, upon which they had proposed a base parking ratio of 0.95 spaces per unit. The Committee and staff expressed questions regarding the impact of having a higher rate of two-bedroom apartments, and the effect that might have on parking needs of the residents. The applicant's indicated that two-bedroom units are desirable even for a single tenant for use as a guest room, storage and hobby space. The proposed project is actually parked at a ratio of 1.2 spaces per apartment unit. The final parking ratio must be outlined in the Development agreement, which in turn will ensure that this is a senior-only complex for the life of the project. The Committee preferred to incorporate garages into the development package, ratherthan the use of carports only. A combination of garages and carports maybe acceptable, however, this type of project warrants the availability of garages for residents. The design modifications shall be presented to the committee on the consent calendar prior to forvvarding to he Planning Commission. DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE MEETING ACTION AGENDA AND MINUTES TUESDAY OCTOBER 15, 2002 5:00 P.M. RANCHO CYCAMON6A ilYli CENTER CONFERENCE ROOM ZOOZ 1 OSOO CIYIC CENTER PRIME RANCHO CYCAMON6A Committee Members: John Mannerino Pam Stewart Alternates: Peter Tolstoy Rich Macias CONSENT CALENDAR Dan Coleman Larry McNiel The following items are expected to be routine and non-controversial. Typically they are items such as plan revisions prepared in response to discussions at a previous meeting. NO ITEMS l J PROJECT REVIEW ITEMS This is the time and place for the Committee to discuss and provide direction to an applicant regarding their development application. The following items do not legally require any public testimony, although the Committee may open the meeting for public input. 5:00 p.m. (Brent) DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2002-00690 -FOREST CITY DEVELOPMENT - A request to construct approximately 500,000 square feet of retail and commercial buildings on 147 acres of land located within the limits of the Victoria Community Plan generally bounded by the future Church Street to the north, the I-15 Freeway to the east, Day Creek Boulevard to the west, and Foothill Boulevard to the south - APN: 227-201-30, 33, 35, and 36; 227-161-35, 36, and 38; 227-171-22, and 23; 227- 211-24, 39, and 40 t0 43. This project is based on the Environmental Impact Report (State Clearinghouse No. 20010301028) prepared for Development Agreement 01-02, Victoria Community Plan Amendment 01-01, and Tentative Parcel Map SUBTT15716 approved by the City Council on February 20, 2002. PUBLIC COMMENTS This is the time and place for the general public to address the Committee. State law prohibits the Committee from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Committee may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are limited to five minutes per individual. ADJOURNMENT • DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS • 5:00 p.m. Brent Le Count October 15, 2002 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2002-00690 -FOREST CITY DEVELOPMENT - A request to construct approximately 500,000 square feet of retail and commercial buildings on 147 acres of land located within the limits of the Victoria Community Plan generally bounded by the future Church Street to the north, the I-15 Freeway to the east, Day Creek.Boulevard to the west, and Foothill Boulevard to the south - APN: 227-201-30, 33, 35, and 36; 227-161-35, 36, and 38; 227-171-22, and 23; 227-211-24, 39, and 40 t0 43. This project is based on the Environmental Impact Report (State Clearinghouse No. 20010301028) prepared for Development Agreement 01-02, Victoria Community Plan Amendment 01-01, and Tentative Parcel Map SUBTT15716 approved bythe City Council on February 20, 2002. The primary focus of discussion will be 360 degrees architecture and how service/loading/trash compactors will be screened and located. It there is sufficient time left there will be discussion of major landscape features such as paseos, gardens, and Town Square. Plans will be presented at the meeting. Design Review Committee Action: Members Present: Pam Stewart, John Mannerino, Dan Coleman Staff Planner: Brent Le Count • The focus of the meeting involved screening of loading areas and trash compactors, paseo design treatment, and 360-degree architecture. The Committee had the following comments: Trash compactors maybe located either in tucked away areas along sides of parking areas as shown on the new design or in the central parking area as originally designed. The central location eliminates some of the crime prevention concerns. In either case, the compactors shall be very well screened though the use of decorative masonry walls, trellises or similar architectural features and substantial landscaping. Locating the compactors in the central parking areas may necessitate screening methods that appear as small buildings similar to concrete cisterns or other vintage agricultural structures. Where compactors must be set on an angle for access, the screen walls built around the compactor shall be built square relative to the surrounding parking and buildings to avoid an awkward, forced, angular appearance. The developer was encouraged to consider a design that resembled the historic pump houses or other small winery buildings. Loading areas shall also receive substantial screening in the form of decorative masonry walls and landscaping. The rear side (north side facing Church Street) of the Terra Vista Shopping Center provides an example of well-screened loading areas. Another favorable alternative would be to locate trash compactors and loading in close proximity so that they can both be screened by a single screen wall. This shall be architecturally integrated into the building through the use of trellises and repeating key building elements on the screen walls. 3. The Committee expressed concern about the impact of Santa Ana winds on the tunnel like paseos. They strongly suggest that plant materials and structures such as overhead • trellises be able to withstand the high seasonal winds. Consider also non-plant shade structures such as metallic umbrellas that can handle high winds. The paseo designs were otherwise acceptable. The developer indicated they are still completing their wind study. DRC COMMENTS DRC2002-00690 -FOREST CITY DEVELOPMENT • October 15, 2002 Page 2 4. The Committee is of the opinion that it is appropriate for the side and rear of a building to look like the side or rear. However, this does not justify minimal design solutions. There is an over reliance upon landscaping to "cover up" the plain building walls. The rears of the buildings especially should be restudied to be more visually interesting. This could include use of glass and file features, greater insets, color variation, and use of murals. • • DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS U C~ OCTOBER 15, 2002 PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no public comments at this time. ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 6:30 p.m. Respectfully submitted, rad Bu4 Secretary • • DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE MEETING TUESDAY OCTOBER 15, 2002 5:00 P.M. RANCHO CYCAMON6A CIYIC CENTER CONFERENCE ROOM ~OOZ 10500 CIYIC CENTER pR1YE RANCHO CYCAMONaA Committee Members: John Mannerino Pam Stewart Alternates: Peter Tolstoy Rich Macias CONSENT CALENDAR Dan Coleman Larry McNiel The following items are expected to be routine and non-controversial. Typically they are items such as plan revisions prepared in response to discussions at a previous meeting. NO ITEMS PROJECT REVIEW ITEMS This is the time and place for the Committee to discuss and provide direction to an applicant regarding their development application. The following items do not legally require any public • testimony, although the Committee may open the meeting for public input. 5:00 p.m. (Brent) DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2002-00690- FOREST CITY DEVELOPMENT-A request to construct approximately 500,000 square feet of retail and commercial buildings on 147 acres of land located within the limits of the Victoria Community Plan generally bounded by the future Church Street to the north, the I-15 Freeway to the east, Day Creek Boulevard to the west, and Foothill Boulevard to the south - APN: 227-201-30, 33, 35, and 36; 227-161-35, 36, and 38; 227-171-22, and 23; 227- 211-24, 39, and 40 t0 43. This project is based on the Environmental Impact Report (State Clearinghouse No. 20010301028) prepared for Development Agreement 01-02, Victoria Community Plan Amendment 01-01, and Tentative Parcel Map SUBTT15716 approved by the City Council on February 20, 2002. PUBLIC COMMENTS This is the time and place for the general public to address the Committee. State law prohibits the Committee from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Committee may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are limited to five minutes per individual. ADJOURNMENT 1, Mary Lou Gragg, Office Specialist 11 for the City of Rancho Cucamonga, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on October 10, 2002, at least 72 hours prior to • the meeting per Government Code Section 54954.2 of 10500 Civic Ce ter Drive, Rancho Cucamonga. ~,~ ~~ DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS • 5:00 p.m. Brent Le Count October 15, 2002 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2002-00690 -FOREST CITY DEVELOPMENT - A request to construct approximately 500,000 square feet of retail and commercial buildings on 147 acres of land located within the limits of the Victoria Community Plan generally bounded by the future Church Street to the north, the I-15 Freeway to the east, Day Creek Boulevard to the west, and Foothill Boulevard to the south - APN: 227-201-30, 33, 35, and 36; 227-161-35, 36, and 38; 227-171-22, and 23; 227-211-24, 39, and 40 t0 43. This project is based on the Environmental Impact Report (State Clearinghouse No. 20010301028) prepared for Development Agreement 01-02, Victoria Community Plan Amendment 01-01, and Tentative Parcel Map SUBTT15716 approved by the City Council on February 20, 2002. The primary focus of discussion will be 360 degrees architecture and how service/loading/trash compactors will be screened and located. It there is sufficient time left there will be discussion of major landscape features such as paseos, gardens, and Town Square. Plans will be presented at the meeting. Design Review Committee Action Members Present: Staff Planner: Brent Le Count • r 1 L~ DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE MEETING ACTION AGENDA AND MINUTES TUESDAY OCTOBER 1, 2002 7:00 P.M. RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER RAINS ROOM 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA Committee Members: John Mannerino Pam Stewart Alternates: Peter Tolstoy Rich Macias CONSENT CALENDAR Dan Coleman Larry McNiel The following items are expected to be routine and non-controversial. Typically they are items such as plan revisions prepared in response to discussions at a previous meeting. 7:00 p.m. (Debra) ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT/DESIGN REVIEW DRC2002-00633 - FOUNTAINGLEN PROPERTIES -The review of detailed site plan and building elevations for a proposal to develop 216 market-rate apartments for seniors on 7.18 acres in the High Density Residential component (24-30 dwelling units per acre) of the MHO District (Office, Hospital and related facilities) of the Terra Vista • Community Plan, located at the southwest corner of Church Street and Mayten Avenue APN: 227-151-70. Related Files: Development Agreement DRC2002-00643 and Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM15923. PROJECT REVIEW ITEMS This is the time and place for the Committee to discuss and provide direction to an applicant regarding their development application. The following items do not legally require any public testimony, although the Committee may open the meeting for public input. 7:10 p.m. (Rick) ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2002-00466- MAGYAR HOMES - A request to construct 17 homes on 4.9 acres of land in the Low (2-4 dwelling units per acre) Residential District located on the east side of Archibald Avenue, approximately 145 feet north of Palo Alto Street -APN: 1077-021-17 and 18. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16344 - MAGYAR HOMES - A request to subdivide a 4.9-acre parcel of land into 18single-family lots in the Low (2-4 dwelling units per acre) Residential District, located on the east side of Archibald Avenue, approximately 145 feet north of Palo Alto Street -APN: 1077-021-17 and18. 7:30 p.m. (Emily) ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2002-001 1 6- EAGLE FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP -Development of a 25,622 square foot warehouse in the Industrial District, Subarea 13, located at 9275 Charles Smith Avenue - .~ APN: 229-283-02. • DRC AGENDA October 1, 2002 Page 2 7:50 p.m. (Emily) ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEWDRC2002-00618- STONEBRIDGE -The review of house plans for 22 single-family lots in the Very Low Residential District (less than 2 dwellings per acre) located generally on the east side of Hermosa Avenue and north of Hillside Road - APN: 1074-241-03. Related File: SUBTT16332. PUBLIC COMMENTS This is the time and place for the general public to address the Committee. State law prohibits the Committee from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Committee may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are limited to five minutes per individual. ADJOURNMENT C C~ CONSENT CALENDAR COMMENTS . 7:00 p.m. Debra Meier October 1, 2002 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENTAND DEVELOPMENT/DESIGN REVIEW DRC2002-00633- FOUNTAIN GLEN PROPERTIES -The review of detailed site plan and building elevations for a proposal to develop 216 market-rate apartments for seniors on 7.18 acres in the High Density Residential component (24-30 dwelling units per acre) of the MHO District (Office, Hospital and related facilities) of the Terra Vista Community Plan, located at the southwest corner of Church Street and Mayten Avenue - APN: 227-151-70. Related Files: Development Agreement DRC2002-00643 and Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM15923. Design Review Committee Action: Members Present: Staff Planner: Debra Meier Meeting was cancelled at the applicant's request. • n IL.J DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS • 7:10 p.m. Rick Fisher October 1, 2002 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2002-00466 -MAGYAR HOMES - A request to construct 17 homes on 4.9 acres of land in the Low (2-4 dwelling units per acre) Residential District located on the east side of Archibald Avenue, approximately 145 feet north of Palo Alto Street -APN: 1077-021-17 and 18. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16344 -MAGYAR HOMES - A request to subdivide a 4.9-acre parcel of land into 18 single-family lots in the Low (2-4 dwelling units per acre) Residential District, located on the east side of Archibald Avenue, approximately 145 feet north of Palo Alto Street -APN: 1077-021-17 and18. Design Parameters: The project site is currently vacant and is surrounded by a Neighborhood Shopping Center to the north, single-family residential to the east and south, and single-family residential and a church across Archibald Avenue to the west. There are three existing single-family homes located on the west side of the property. Two of these homes will be demolished. The remaining home will be preserved and will become part of the proposed subdivision as Lot 11. The proposed 17single-family homes will be single story and will range in size from 1,975 square feet to 2,387 square feet. Lot sizes will range from 7,662 square feet to 17,825 square feet. Access to the site will be from Malven Avenue only. No vehicular or pedestrian access will be available from Archibald Avenue. A 6-foot high block wall exists on the north and east property lines. The applicant will construct a new 6-foot block wall on the south and west property lines. . A total of nine different exterior facades will be provided to create visual interest in the new subdivision. The exterior building materials will consist of stucco, aluminum roll up doors, built-out columns with coins, foam molding around window panes, 24-inch by 24-inch attic vents, built out columns, stucco covered chimneys, and concrete file roofs. Three different floor plans will be available. The floor plan for model one will have a garage, which has side frontage toward the street to further break up the appearance of monotonous garage fronts. Full front yard landscaping will be installed prior to occupancy. The block wall along Archibald Avenue will be designed according to the Archibald Avenue Beautification Program. The 6-foot high stucco covered wall will contain 24-inch by 24-inch pilasters covered with real river rock. Staff Comments: The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion. Secondary Issues: Once all of the major issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues: Noise - A Noise Study was conducted to determine the impact of noise from Archibald Avenue on the proposed residences. The study also looked at what the noise impact from trucks entering and exiting the Albertson's grocery store would have on the new residences. The study found that no building upgrades will be required to mitigate noise from Archibald Avenue, since the projected interior noise levels at the nearest residences on the western side of the project will be less than 42.6 db CNEL, which is within the noise standards of 45db CNEL. In addition, the projected interior noise level at the nearest residential homes on the north side of the project site will be as high as 39.1 dBA, which is within the noise standard of 45 dBA. No building upgrades were recommended for these homes either. • 2. Provide window mullions on select rear windows to match front elevation on Plan 1 B and PIan2A. DRC COMMENTS DRC2002-00466 & SUBTT16344 -MAGYAR HOMES • October 1, 2002 Page 2 3. Fencing -The proposed 6-foot wood fence above the proposed 3-foot retaining wall on the south property line will result in a 9 to 10-foot wall for the existing residences south of the project site. A Minor Exception is required. Also, all project perimeterfence material should be solid masonry as required by the Development Code. Policy Issues: The following items are a matter of Planning Commission policy and should be incorporated into the project design without discussion. 1. Archibald Avenue streetscape should be improved consistent with the City's Archibald Avenue Beautification Master Plan, including, but not limited to, river rock pilasters at lot corners. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends Committee approval with the above-recommended conditions. Design Review Committee Action: Members Present: John Mannerino, Pam Stewart, Nancy Fong Staff Planner: Rick Fisher The Committee recommended approval subject to these conditions of approval: • 1. The return walls between the proposed homes that face the street shall be covered with stucco and painted to match the color of the homes. r1 f,.J DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS . 7:30 p.m. Emily Wimer October 1, 2002 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2002-00116 -EAGLE FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP -Development of a 25,622 square foot warehouse in the Industrial District, Subarea 13, located at 9275 Charles Smith Avenue - APN - 229-283-02. Design Parameters: The project was approved at the Design Review Committee meeting on August 6, 2002. The Committee members discussed the window materials, and it was conditioned that the applicant would provide Solar gray glass on the I-15 Freeway elevation of the building (see attached condition #6 of Design Review Committee action dated August 6, 2002). If clear glass is allowed the window of the building could lead to advertising and signage, which cannot be restricted. Staff has informed the applicant that the modification of the condition would require approval by the Design Review Committee. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Committee deny the request for clear glass on the freeway elevation. Attachment Design Review Committee Action: Members Present: • Staff Planner: Emily Wimer This item was cancelled and will be on the November 5, 2002 agenda. • DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS • 7:50 p.m. Emily Wimer October 1, 2002 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2002-00618 - STONEBRIDGE -The review of house plans for 22 single-family lots in the Very Low Residential District (less than 2 dwellings per acre) located generally on the east side of Hermosa Avenue and north of Hillside Road - APN: 1074-241-03. Related File: SUBTT16332. Design Parameters: The site is located on the north side of Hillside Road and east of Hermosa Avenue. Surrounding land uses include single-family homes to the north, east, and southwest of the project site. To the north is Tract 16193, Empire Homes, which is under construction. Sidewalks, trails, and landscaping will be required with project approval. The site slopes southerly at an approximate 4 to 8 percent grade and is subject to Hillside Review with this submittal of house product. The project meets the minimum lot depth of 200 feet and exceeds the minimum lot size net average of 22,500. The elevations consist of three separate floor plans and three elevation options for each floor plan. Santa Barbara, Italianate, and Monterey are the three main architectural styles. The elevations incorporate many design details including trellis, wood pot shelves, shutters, corbels, and recessed plaster detail. The floor plans include courtyard areas and porch front entries. The standard 3-car garage provides a split layout in two of the three plans. The floor plans range from 3,642 to 4,220 square feet, and range from 5 to 6 bedrooms. The Tract Map was approved on August 29, 2002. The applicant has worked diligently with staff to . preserve the majority of the trees and place the trail at the top of slope. Replacement of all other trees will be required on-site at a one to one ratio. Public CommunityTrailsave proposed along both street frontages within expanded parkways. Local feeder trails are proposed to the rear of all lots. Staff Comments: The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion. Maior Issues: The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this project: Provide 360-degree architecture by upgrading architecture on all side and rear elevations. For example, on the Santa Barbara style, incorporate recessed plaster detail, and continue the window mullion style. Italianate style should incorporate wood shutters, window mullion style, and stacked stone chimney. Monterey style should incorporate side shutters, oversized wood trim detail, and recessed plaster detail. These details should be repeated on all four sides of the elevations. Secondary Issues: Once all of the major issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues: Although the front setbacks provide a +/-5 foot variation as required by Code, there is opportunity on Lots 1-14 of even greater variety. The proposed average rear yard setback is 149 feet and could easily be reduced. To add larger variation to the front yard setback, stagger the house footprint, and provide movement on the frontage of "Street B." • 2. The hitching post area on south side of Street "B," west of, and to be maintained by the owner of Lot 22, should be decomposed granite surface to match adjoining horse trail. DRC COMMENTS DRC2002-00618 - STONEBRIDGE • October 1, 2002 Page 2 Policy Issues: The following items are a matter of Planning Commission policy and should be incorporated into the project design without discussion: On corner side yard areas, a 5-foot minimum landscape area is required between the wall and sidewalk. Provide irrigation and landscaping in this area. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends Committee approval with the above-recommended conditions. Design Review Committee Action: Members Present: Pam Stewart, John Mannerino Staff Planner: Emily Wimer The Committee approved the project subject to the revisions shown at the meeting. The revised elevations will incorporate additional trim, shutters and stucco on the side and rear elevations. The applicant agreed to the additional setback variation of 5 feet (total of 10 feet) on Lots 1-14. ~~ DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS . OCTOBER 1, 2002 PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no public comments at this time. ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 7:25 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Brad Buller Secretary • • • DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE MEETING TUESDAY OCTOBER 1, 2002 7:00 P.M. RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER RAINS ROOM 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA Committee Members: John Mannerino Pam Stewart Alternates: Peter Tolstoy Rich Macias CONSENT CALENDAR Dan Coleman Larry McNiel The following items are expected to be routine and non-controversial. Typically they are items such as plan revisions prepared in response to discussions at a previous meeting. 7:00 p.m. (Debra) ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT/DESIGN REVIEW DRC2002-00633 - FOUNTAINGLEN PROPERTIES -The review of detailed site plan and building elevations for a proposal to develop 216 market-rate apartments for seniors on 7.18 acres in the High Density Residential component (24-30 dwelling units per acre) of the MHO District (Office, Hospital and related facilities) of the Terra Vista • Community Plan, located at the southwest corner of Church Street and Mayten Avenue APN: 227-151-70. Related Files: Development Agreement DRC2002-00643 and Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM15923. PROJECT REVIEW ITEMS This is the time and place for the Committee to discuss and provide direction to an applicant regarding their development application. The following items do not legally require any public testimony, although the Committee may open the meeting for public input. 7:10 p.m. (Rick) ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEWDRC2002-00466- MAGYAR HOMES - A request to construct 17 homes on 4.9 acres of land in the Low (2-4 dwelling units per acre) Residential District located on the east side of Archibald Avenue, approximately 145 feet north of Palo Alto Street -APN: 1077-021-17 and 18. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16344 - MAGYAR HOMES - A request to subdivide a 4.9-acre parcel of land into 18single-family lots in the Low (2-4 dwelling units per acre) Residential District, located on the east side of Archibald Avenue, approximately 145 feet north of Palo Alto Street -APN: 1077-021-17 and18. 7:30 p.m. (Emily) ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEWDRC2002-001 1 6- EAGLE FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP -Development of a 25,622 square foot . warehouse in the Industrial District, Subarea 13, located at 9275 Charles Smith Avenue - APN: 229-283-02. • DRC AGENDA October 1, 2002 Page 2 7:50 p.m. (Emily) ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEWDRC2002-00618- STONEBRIDGE -The review of house plans for 22 single-family lots in the Very Low Residential District (less than 2 dwellings per acre) located generally on the east side of Hermosa Avenue and north of Hillside Road - APN: 1074-241-03. Related File: SUBTT16332. PUBLIC COMMENTS This is the time and place for the general public to address the Committee. State law prohibits the Committee from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Committee may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are limited to five minutes per individual. ADJOURNMENT 1, Mary Lou Gragg, Office Specialist 11 for the City of Rancho Cucamonga, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on September26, 2002, at least 72 hours prior to the meeting per Government Code Section 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga. • CJ CONSENT CALENDAR COMMENTS • 7:00 p.m. Debra Meier October 1, 2002 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT/DESIGN REVIEW DRC2002-00633 - FOUNTAINGLEN PROPERTIES -The review of detailed site plan and building elevations for a proposal to develop 216 market-rate apartments for seniors on 7.18 acres in the High Density Residential component (24-30 dwelling units per acre) of the MHO District (Office, Hospital and related facilities) of the Terra Vista Community Plan, located at the southwest corner of Church Street and Mayten Avenue - APN: 227-151-70. Related Files: Development Agreement DRC2002-00643 and Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM15923. Design Review Committee Action: Members Present: Staff Planner: Debra Meier n I..J U DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS • 7:10 p.m. Rick Fisher October 1, 2002 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2002-00466-MAGYAR HOMES - A request to construct 17 homes on 4.9 acres of land in the Low (2-4 dwelling units per acre) Residential District located on the east side of Archibald Avenue, approximately 145 feet north of Palo Alto Street -APN: 1077-021-17 and 18. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16344 -MAGYAR HOMES - A request to subdivide a 4.9-acre parcel of land into 18 single-family lots in the Low (2-4 dwelling units per acre) Residential District, located on the east side of Archibald Avenue, approximately 145 feet north of Palo Alto Street -APN: 1077-021-17 and18. Design Parameters: The project site is currently vacant and is surrounded by a Neighborhood Shopping Center to the north, single-family residential to the east and south, and single-family residential and a church across Archibald Avenue to the west. There are three existing single-family homes located on the west side of the property. Two of these homes will be demolished. The remaining home will be preserved and will become part of the proposed subdivision as Lot 11. The proposed 17single-family homes will be single story and will range in size from 1,975 square feet to 2,387 square feet. Lot sizes will range from 7,662 square feet to 17,825 square feet. Access to the site will be from Malven Avenue only. No vehicular or pedestrian access will be available from Archibald Avenue. A 6-foot high block wall exists on the north and east property lines. The applicant will construct a new 6-foot block wall on the south and west property lines. • A total of nine different exterior facades will be provided to create visual interest in the new subdivision. The exterior building materials will consist of stucco, aluminum roll up doors, built-out columns with coins, foam molding around window panes, 24-inch by 24-inch attic vents, built out columns, stucco covered chimneys, and concrete file roofs. Three different floor plans will be available. The floor plan for model one will have a garage, which has side frontage toward the street to further break up the appearance of monotonous garage fronts. Full front yard landscaping will be installed prior to occupancy. The block wall along Archibald Avenue will be designed according to the Archibald Avenue Beautification Program. The 6-foot high stucco covered wall will contain 24-inch by 24-inch pilasters covered with real river rock. Staff Comments: The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion. Secondary Issues: Once all of the major issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues: Noise - A Noise Study was conducted to determine the impact of noise from Archibald Avenue on the proposed residences. The study also looked at what the noise impact from trucks entering and exiting the Albertson's grocery store would have on the new residences. The study found that no building upgrades will be required to mitigate noise from Archibald Avenue, since the projected interior noise levels at the nearest residences on the western side of the project will be less than 42.6 db CNEL, which is within the noise standards of 45db CNEL. In addition, the projected interior noise level at the nearest residential homes on the north side of the project site will be as high as 39.1 dBA, which is within the noise standard of 45 dBA. No building upgrades were recommended for these homes either. . 2. Provide window mullions on select rear windows to match front elevation on Plan 1 B and PIan2A. DRC COMMENTS DRC2002-00466 & SUBTT16344 -MAGYAR HOMES October 1, 2002 • Page 2 3. Fencing -The proposed 6-foot wood fence above the proposed 3-foot retaining wall on the south property line will result in a 9 to 10-foot wall for the existing residences south of the project site. A Minor Exception is required. Also, all project perimeterfence material should be solid masonry as required by the Development Code. Policy Issues: The following items are a matter of Planning Commission policy and should be incorporated into the project design without discussion. Archibald Avenue streetscape should be improved consistent with the City's Archibald Avenue Beautification Master Plan, including, but not limited to, river rock pilasters at lot corners. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends Committee approval with the above-recommended conditions. Design Review Committee Action: Members Present: Staff Planner: Rick Fisher • • DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS • 7:30 p.m. Emily Wimer October 1, 2002 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2002-00116 -EAGLE FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP -Development of a 25,622 square foot warehouse in the Industrial District, Subarea 13, located at 9275 Charles Smith Avenue - APN - 229-283-02. Design Parameters: The project was approved at the Design Review Committee meeting on August 6, 2002. The Committee members discussed the window materials, and it was conditioned that the applicant would provide Solar gray glass on the I-15 Freeway elevation of the building (see attached condition #6 of Design Review Committee action dated August 6, 2002). If clear glass is allowed the window of the building could lead to advertising and signage, which cannot be restricted. Staff has informed the applicant that the modification of the condition would require approval by the Design Review Committee. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Committee deny the request for clear glass on the freeway elevation. Attachment Desion Review Committee Action: Members Present: • Staff Planner: Emily Wimer • DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS •, 7:40 p.m. Emily Wimer August 6, 2002 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2002-00116 -EAGLE FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP -The development of a 25,622 square foot warehouse in the Industrial District, Subarea 13, located at 9275 Charles Smith Avenue - APN: 229-283-02. Design Parameters: The project site is situated on the east side of Charles Smith Road on approximately 1.25 acres of land. The property is bordered to the east by the 1-15 freeway, to the south by Cardlock filling station, and to the north is an industrial warehouse building. The 25,622 square foot speculative warehouse building also includes a 5,104 square foot mezzanine. The property is generally flat with less than a 2 percent slope. The proposed project is a speculative building targeting warehouse distribution tenant with limited office space. A total of four loading docks, two of which are small truck loading only, and two 14-foot by 50-foot loading docks on either side. A total of two truck parking spaces are proposed. Additional parking for expansion of the office space has been included in the parking calculations. Finish materials for the building exterior include Greylite glass, beige Travertine stone, and painted tilt-up concrete. The applicant will be providing a range of hue tones for the tilt-up concrete at Design Review Committee. The landscape setback of 25 feet will allow for bench seating at the front of the building. The applicant will also provide a model at the Committee meeting. Staff Comments: The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion. •) Secondary Issues: Once all of the major issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues: Colors: The Committee should review the proposed materials sample board and color chips, which are different than the colored elevations. Green is proposed on the majority of the building with gray accent stripes. The applicant has provided samples of at least a half dozen shades of green for your consideration. The Travertine stone color should compliment the main material of the building (although both gray and beige tones will work with green, the accent stripes should match the Travertine stone color). The Industrial Districts architectural guidelines state that, "building materials, colors, and textures shall be compatible with those of adjacent or nearby buildings.° Photographs of the adjoining buildings will be provided at the Committee meeting. Policy Issues: The following items are a matter of Planning Commission policy and should be incorporated into the project design without discussion: All doors and roll-up dock doors shall be painted to match the building. (Doors on freeway elevation are called out as the color of gray glass.) Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the project with incorporation of modifications. Design Review Committee Action: . Members Present: Larry McNiel, Pam Stewart, Nancy Fong Staff Planner: Emily Wimer DRC COMMENTS DRC2002-00116 -EAGLE FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP August 6, 2002 •~ Page 2 The Committee recommended approval of the project subject to the following conditions: 1. Provide a minimum 8-foot by 8-foot color test panel on the building for Design Review Committee review and approval. If the Committee does not approve the color, the applicant shall submit a different color for the building, subject to Design Review Committee review. 2. The raw edges of the travertine material shall not be exposed. 3. The perimeter wall (east property line) will be constructed of split face block with a decorative cap. 4. Grooved concrete walls will be provided on all screen walls as illustrated on the elevations. 5. Additional trees will be required on site on the east elevation, facing the freeway. 6. Solar gray glass will be provided on all windows. C~ ~' DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS • 7:50 p.m. Emily Wimer October 1, 2002 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2002-00618 - STONEBRIDGE -The review of house plans for 22 single-family lots in the Very Low Residential District (less than 2 dwellings per acre) located generally on the east side of Hermosa Avenue and north of Hillside Road - APN: 1074-241-03. Related File: SUBTT16332. Design Parameters: The site is located on the north side of Hillside Road and east of Hermosa Avenue. Surrounding land uses include single-family homes to the north, east, and southwest of the project site. To the north is Tract 16193, Empire Homes, which is under construction. Sidewalks, trails, and landscaping will be required with project approval. The site slopes southerly at an approximate 4 to 8 percent grade and is subject to Hillside Review with this submittal of house product. The project meets the minimum lot depth of 200 feet and exceeds the minimum lot size net average of 22,500. The elevations consist of three separate floor plans and three elevation options for each floor plan. Santa Barbara, Italianate, and Monterey are the three main architectural styles. The elevations incorporate many design details including trellis, wood pot shelves, shutters, corbels, and recessed plaster detail. The floor plans include courtyard areas and porch front entries. The standard 3-car garage provides a split layout in two of the three plans. The floor plans range from 3,642 to 4,220 square feet, and range from 5 to 6 bedrooms. The Tract Map was approved on August 29, 2002. The applicant has worked diligently with staff to • preserve the majority of the trees and place the trail at the top of slope. Replacement of all other trees will be required on-site at a one to one ratio. Public Community Trails are proposed along both street frontages within expanded parkways. Local feeder trails are proposed to the rear of all lots. Staff Comments: The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion. Maior Issues: The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this project: Provide 360-degree architecture by upgrading architecture on all side and rear elevations. For example, on the Santa Barbara style, incorporate recessed plaster detail, and continue the window mullion style. Italianate style should incorporate wood shutters, window mullion style, and stacked stone chimney. Monterey style should incorporate side shutters, oversized wood trim detail, and recessed plaster detail. These details should be repeated on all four sides of the elevations. Secondary Issues: Once all of the major issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues: Although the front setbacks provide a +/-5 foot variation as required by Code, there is opportunity on Lots 1-14 of even greater variety. The proposed average rear yard setback is 149 feet and could easily be reduced. To add larger variation to the front yard setback, stagger the house footprint, and provide movement on the frontage of "Street B." • 2. The hitching post area on south side of Street "B," west of, and to be maintained by the owner of Lot 22, should be decomposed granite surface to match adjoining horse trail. DRC COMMENTS DRC2002-00618 - STONEBRIDGE October 1, 2002 Page 2 Policy Issues: The following items are a matter of Planning Commission policy and should be incorporated into the project design without discussion: On corner side yard areas, a 5-foot minimum landscape area is required between the wall and sidewalk. Provide irrigation and landscaping in this area. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends Committee approval with the above-recommended conditions. Design Review Committee Action: Members Present: Staff Planner: Emily Wimer • r~ • DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE MEETING ACTION AGEND~'AND MINUTES TUESDAY OCTOBER 1, 2002 5:00 P.M. RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER CONFERENCE ROOM 2002 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA Committee Members: John Mannerino Pam Stewart Alternates: Peter Tolstoy Rich Macias CONSENT CALENDAR Dan Coleman Larry McNiel The following items are expected to be routine and non-controversial. Typically they are items such as plan revisions prepared in response to discussions at a previous meeting. NO ITEMS HAVE BEEN SUBMITTED C 1 PROJECT REVIEW ITEMS This is the time and place for the Committee to discuss and provide direction to an applicant regarding their development application. The following items do not legally require any public testimony, although the Committee may open the meeting for public input. 5:00 p.m. (Brent) DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2002-00690 -FOREST CITY DEVELOPMENT - A request to construct approximately 500,000 square feet of retail and commercial buildings on 147 acres of land located within the limits of the Victoria Community Plan generally bounded by the future Church Street to the north, the I-15 Freeway to the east, Day Creek Boulevard to the west, and Foothill Boulevard to the south - APN: 227-201-30, 33, 35, and 36; 227-161-35, 36, and 38; 227-171-22, and 23; 227- 211-24, 39, and 40 t0 43. This project is based on the Environmental Impact Report (State Clearinghouse No. 20010301028) prepared for Development Agreement 01-02, Victoria Community Plan Amendment 01-01, and Tentative Parcel Map SUBTT15716 approved by the City Council on February 20, 2002. PUBLIC COMMENTS This is the time and place for the general public to address the Committee. State law prohibits the Committee from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Committee may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are limited to five minutes per individual. ADJOURNMENT J • DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 5:00 p.m. Brent Le Count October 1, 2002 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2002-00690 -FOREST CITY DEVELOPMENT - A request to construct approximately 500,000 square feet of retail and commercial buildings on 147 acres of land located within the limits of the Victoria Community Plan generally bounded by the future Church Street to the north, the I-15 Freeway to the east, Day Creek Boulevard to the west, and Foothill Boulevard to the south - APN: 227-201-30, 33, 35, and 36; 227-161-35, 36, and 38; 227-171-22, and 23; 227-211-24, 39, and 40 t0 43. This project is based on the Environmental Impact Report (State Clearinghouse No. 20010301028) prepared for Development Agreement 01-02, Victoria Community Plan Amendment 01-01, and Tentative Parcel Map SUBTT15716 approved by the City Council on February 20, 2002. This is meant to be a continuation of discussion begun at the September 23, 2002 Planning Commission Workshop regarding the project. Design Review Committee Action: Members Present: Pam Stewart, John Mannerino, Nancy Fong Staff Planner: Brent Le Count • Forest City/Altoon Porter Architects reviewed the exterior colors and materials for building elevations facing internal streets. Colored elevations, colored perspective renderings, and color and material samples were provided for each building. The Committee had the following comments: The Committee has not yet had a chance to review the "Tenant Control Handbook" now being prepared by the applicant. However, there is concern that individual tenant space improvements are being relied upon too much to provide a visually interesting and satisfying experience. The developer-installed buildings shall be of substantial architectural quality on their own without such reliance. Many of the following comments will help ensure this quality. 2. The Committee expressed concern regarding the amount of relief between the window surfaces and the face of columns as well as between buildings/shops within one overall building. The elevations appeared overly flat and in some cases, such as Building 3100 there is no horizontal change of plane between one section of the building and another. There should be a change of plane here as well as a column terminating one building into the wall surface of the adjacent. Avoid having one wall surface color or material join another color or material in the same plane. Building 3200A begins to reflect the level of surface relief sought. 3. Second story windows should be in-set as much as possible to convey a sense of depth and • sculptural quality. 4. Avoid the use of overly garish colors such as the strong yellow paint sample shown for Building 3100. It is recognized that a wide variety of colors will foster visual interest but it is the intent to avoid the appearance of such examples as the Ontario Mills. • DRC AGENDA DRC DRC2002-00690 -FOREST CITY DEVELOPMENT October 1, 2002 Page 2 5. Provide a sample of the awning materials for review at a future meeting. 6. Provide greater use of base materials such as stone and tile, especially to accent building entrances and other key features such as towers. For instance, Building 3600 has limestone cladding on a major portion of the tower on the west end of the building and building 3800A has multi-colored brick. 7. The top edge of building walls (top of parapet) shall receive enhanced treatment for visual interest. For instance, building 5000A has a decorative chevron application along the top edge/cornice while some other buildings such as 5400 or 1600 appear to have a plainer looking edge. This is not to say that art deco chevrons should be applied everywhere but that tops of building walls shall be handled sensitively to enhance visual interest. This also applies to the tops of columns where they are shown to project above the roofline such as building 1600. The projection shall be substantial to enhance the presence of the column. 8. All towers and other vertical projections above roof lines shall be completed all the way around to avoid a false, Hollywood set like appearance. • 9. Avoid concentrating so much detail on certain buildings that others become neglected architecturally. While accents are important to convey rhythm and pattern, all buildings should convey a sense of high quality. 10. The Committee was pleased with and found many desirable qualities in the South Main Street Buildings such as 1100A/B, 1300, and 1500. The meeting concluded with a brief summary review of the concerns raised by the Committee and the applicant agreed to restudy the building design to address their concerns. The Committee asked to see the Tenant Control Handbook as soon as possible so that they may have a chance to review it in advance of the meeting. DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS • OCTOBER 1, 2002 PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no public comments at this time. ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 6:30 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Brad Buller Secretary DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE MEETING TUESDAY OCTOBER 1, 2002 5:00 P.M. RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER CONFERENCE ROOM 2002 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA Committee Members: John Mannerino Pam Stewart Dan Coleman Alternates: Peter Tolstoy Rich Macias Larry McNiel CONSENT CALENDAR The following items are expected to be routine and non-controversial. Typically they are items such as plan revisions prepared in response to discussions at a previous meeting. NO ITEMS HAVE BEEN SUBMITTED PROJECT REVIEW ITEMS This is the time and place for the Committee to discuss and provide direction to an applicant regarding their development application. The following items do not legally require any public • testimony, although the Committee may open the meeting for public input. 5:00 p.m. (Brent) DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2002-00690 -FOREST CITY DEVELOPMENT - A request to construct approximately 500,000 square feet of retail and commercial buildings on 147 acres of land located within the limits of the Victoria Community Plan generally bounded by the future Church Street to the north, the I-15 Freeway to the east, Day Creek Boulevard to the west, and Foothill Boulevard to the south - APN: 227-201-30, 33, 35, and 36; 227-161-35, 36, and 38; 227-171-22, and 23; 227- 211-24, 39, and 40 t0 43. This project is based on the Environmental Impact Report (State Clearinghouse No. 20010301028) prepared for Development Agreement 01-02, Victoria Community Plan Amendment 01-01, and Tentative Parcel Map SUBTT15716 approved by the City Council on February 20, 2002. PUBLIC COMMENTS This is the time and place for the general public to address the Committee. State law prohibits the Committee from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Committee may , receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are limited to five minutes per individual. ADJOURNMENT 1, Mary Lou Gragg, Office Specialist 11 for the City of Rancho Cucamonga, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on September 26, 2002, at least 72 hours prior • to the meeting per Government Code Section 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga. 'u. _ ~ DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS • 5:00 p.m. Brent Le Count October 1, 2002 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2002-00690 -FOREST CITY DEVELOPMENT - A request to construct approximately 500,000 square feet of retail and commercial buildings on 147 acres of land located within the limits of the Victoria Community Plan generally bounded by the future Church Street to the north, the I-15 Freeway to the east, Day Creek Boulevard to the west, and Foothill Boulevard to the south - APN: 227-201-30, 33, 35, and 36; 227-161-35, 36, and 38; 227-171-22, and 23; 227-211-24, 39, and 40 t0 43. This project is based on the Environmental Impact Report (State Clearinghouse No. 20010301028) prepared for Development Agreement 01-02, Victoria Community Plan Amendment 01-01, and Tentative Parcel Map SUBTT15716 approved by the City Council on February 20, 2002. This is meant to be a continuation of discussion begun at the September 23, 2002 Planning Commission Workshop regarding the project. Design Review Committee Action: Members Present: Staff Planner: Brent Le Count •