Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2002/03/19 - Agenda PacketDESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE MEETING ACTION AGENDA AND MINUTES TUESDAY MARCH 19, 2002 7:00 P.M. RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER RAINS ROOM 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA REVISED 3-7-02 Committee Members: Larry McNiel Pam Stewart Nancy Fong Alternates: Peter Tolstoy Rich Macias John Mannerino CONSENT CALENDAR The following items are expected to be routine and non-controversial. Typically they are items such as plan revisions prepared in response to discussions at a previous meeting. NO ITEMS HAVE BEEN SUBMITTED PROJECT REVIEW ITEMS This is the time and place for the Committee to discuss and provide direction to an applicant regarding their development application. The following items do not legally require any public testimony, although the Committee may open the meeting for public input. • 7:00 p.m. (Kirt) ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AN CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2001- 00439 - LIFEWAY CHURCH -The development of a new church facility of approximately 41,300 square feet to include a sanctuary, educational facilities, a gymnasium, administrative offices, and storage on 5.03 acres of land in the Low Residential District (2 to 4 dwelling units per acres) located at the southeast corner of Vineyard Avenue and Calle del Prado -APN: 208-921-36. Related Files: DRC2001-00444. 7:20 p.m. (Doug) ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEWDRC2002-00040 - PANATTONI DEVELOPMENT - A request to construct a 176,870 square foot industrial building on 7.06 acres of land in the General Industrial District (Subarea 5), located east of Hermosa Avenue and north of 6th Street -APN: 209-231-12. 7:40 p.m (Emily) DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2001-00544 (TT16021) - CRESTWOOD CORPORATION - A residential subdivision of 16single-family lots on 7.53 acres of land in the Low Residential District (2 to 4 dwelling units per acre) of the Etiwanda Specific Plan located at the northwest corner of East Avenue and the Southern Pacific Railroad right-of-way -APN: 227-121-30 and 43. Related file: Tree Removal Permit 99-23. 8:00 p.m. (Alan) ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT . DRC2001-00572 - HOGEL-IRELAND, INC. - A request to demolish and rebuild a fast food restaurant, with drive-thru facilities and indoor play area, totaling 4,751 square feet located at 9649 Foothill Boulevard in the Specialty Commercial District~•of Subarea 3, pursuant to Development Code Section 17.32.030E.i.a. - APN: 208-261-053. A Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts is being prepared for consideration. DRC AGENDA March 19, 2002 Page 2 PUBLIC COMMENTS This is the time and place for the general public to address the Committee. State law prohibits the Committee from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Committee may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are limited to five minutes per individual. ADJOURNMENT • • DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 7:00 p.m. Kirt Coury March 19, 2002 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT ANCONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2001-00439-LIFEWAY CHURCH -The development of a new chu rch facility of approximately 41,300 square feet to include a sanctuary, educational facilities, a gymnasium, administrative offices, and storage on 5.03 acres of land in the Low Residential District (2 to 4 dwelling units per acres) located at the southeast corner of Vineyard Avenue and Calle del Prado-APN: 208-921-36. Related Files: DRC2001-00444. PLANS WILL BE AVAILABLE AT THE MEETING Members Present: Larry McNiel, Pam Stewart, Nancy Fong Staff Planner: Kirt Coury The Committee reviewed the revised plans at the meeting and recommended the applicant add the following design items and submit revised plans for review at the next meeting under Consent Calendar review. 1. Modify the east parking lot to add more landscape planter islands and/orwiden the concrete finger islands to allow landscape area. • 2. Provide additional landscaping (trees and shrubs) along the south property line between the proposed drive approach and the identified single-family residences. 3. Add stacked stone treatment to the center of the proposed cross-tower element 4. Add stacked stone pilasters to the bottom portion of the parking lot retaining walls, and maintain a constant vertical height for the stucco portion. 5. Complete full width street improvement along Calle del Prado at the time of the phased development for the gymnasium or the classroom. 6. Future development should include the use of stacked stone for compatibility with the church. • • DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 7:20 p.m. Douglas Fenn March 19, 2002 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2002-00040 - PANATTONI DEVELOPMENT - A request to construct a 176,870 square foot industrial building on 7.06 acres of land in the General Industrial District (Subarea 5), located east of Hermosa Avenue and north of 6th Street - APN: 209-231-12. Design Parameters: The site is located on Hermosa Avenue, approximately 1,200 feet north of 6th Street. The site is vacant and slopes southerly at approximately 2 percent. The site is bordered on the south by vacant land (approved for industrial development DRC01-03 -Paragon), to the north is single-family residences and vacant land, to the west is vacant land and the General Motors warehouse distribution facility that is under construction, and to the east of the is the San Bernardino County Flood Control Channel. The applicant proposes to develop a multi tenant warehouse/distribution building with two office areas. The office area is located at separate ends of the building, and total approximately 6,000 square feet. The building's loading area will front onto Hermosa Avenue and will be screened by a 14-foot high combination of berming and screen wall. The screen wall will be architecturally integrated with the building design. The building incorporates two primary materials. The building will be concrete tilt-up painted gray, silver, and forest berry. Sandblasting is added to accent the office portion of the building. The • project incorporates a reflective glazing at the office areas to create a contrast. The building needs stronger 360-degree architectural details. Staff Comments: The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion. Maior Issues: The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this project: Provide stronger 360-degree architecture detailing on the building facade. Additional sandblasted concrete should be added. 2. Truck access to the loading area should be separated from the pedestrian vehicle access. 3. The screen wall along Hermosa Avenue should reflect the approved architectural detail of the project and a design that has recesses and horizontal movement. Secondary Issues: Once all of the major issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues: Decorative paving at the entrances off Hermosa Avenue should be added. Because the proposed building backs up to a Regional Trail, upgrade landscaping by planting at least one tree per 30 linear of property boundary at the rear of the property. Also, look at planting a type of vine and/or shrub that would make the area more aesthetically appealing. • 3. Outdoor employee eating area(s) should be covered with a decorative trellis shade structure, and a screen wall minimum of 3 feet high should surround the eating area. DRC COMMENTS DRC2002-00040-PANATTONI DEVELOPMENT • March 19, 2002 Page 2 4. Locate the bicycle parking closer to the office entrances of the building. 5. All wall-mounted light fixtures shall have light pointed downwards. Wall-pak type of light fixtures that produce glare must be avoided. Policy Issues: The following items are a matter of Planning Commission policy and should be incorporated into the project design without discussion: Paint roll-up doors and service doors to match main building colors. Provide tables and chairs for outdoor eating area. Provide a gated entrance to the future Regional Trail. Suggest some type of wrought iron gate. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the applicant revise the development plan to address above identified issues and submit for further Committee review. Members Present: Larry McNiel, Pam Stewart, Nancy Fong Staff Planner: Doug Fenn • At the meeting, the applicant submitted revised elevations, site and wall plans that addressed all of the major and secondary issues. With regard to providing a separate truck access to the loading area, the Committee agreed not to require it because of site constraints and the wind factor. The Committee recommended approval to the Planning Commission. • DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 7:40 p.m. Emily Wimer March 19, 2002 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2001-00544 - (TT16021) - CRESTWOOD CORPORATION - A residential subdivision of 16single-family lots on 7.53 acres of land in the Low Residential District (2 to 4 dwelling units per acre) of the Etiwanda Specific Plan located at the northwest corner of East Avenue and the Southern Pacific Railroad right-of-way - APN: 227-121-30 and 43. Related file: Tree Removal Permit 99-23. Background: The map was recorded on March 6, 2002, and was reviewed by Design, Grading, and Technical Review Committees on September 14, and 15, 1999. The single access design was specifically designed with the Etiwanda Specific Plan overlay. A future stub-out street was provided at the southwestern portion of the tract to provide secondary access to the future development. Design Parameters: The project consists of design review for a previously approved Tract 16021, which consists of 16 single- family lots. To the west is vacant property in the Very Low Residential District and to the east are single-family homes, which are also in the Very Low Residential District. The southerly boundary is bordered by Victoria Street, and to the north is bordered by a tree line and partial Community Trail. The property is currently vacant and slopes 2 to 5 percent. • There are 114 trees on or near the subject site. An arborist report recommends removal and replacement of the on-site windrows. The windrows on the northeast corner are outside of the project boundaries and are conditioned to not be damaged by the development. The project consists of three floor plans. Two of the three floor plans are single-story, and all provide athree-car garage. Eleven floor plans are proposed as single-story homes, and five of the floor plans are proposed as two-story homes. Square footage ranges from 2,242 square feet to 2,684 square feet. The project is located within the Etiwanda Specific Plan and the applicant has offset the footprint on the majority of the homes to provide the characteristics of Etiwanda. The project will provide the East Avenue theme wall as the tract boundary wall (stone pilasters with stucco walls and river rock planters). Staff Comments: The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion. Maior Issues: The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this project. The applicant has resolved and diligently worked with staff to resolve previous Major Issues. Secondaro Issues: 1. Extend chimney elements (stucco, siding, etc.) on the entire height of chimney, all four sides • for a balanced appearance. 2. Because of the rural characteristics of Etiwanda Avenue, Elevation B ("Madison") shall be provided on Lot 1. DRC COMMENTS DRC2001-00544 - C RESTW OOD CORPORATION • March 19, 2002 Page 2 3. Lot 6 is a corner lot and can be seen from Brookfield Drive. Provide aone-story floor plan on Lot 6. 4. A minor exception has been submitted for the southern boundary wall, which has a maximum height of 8 feet. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the project, subject to the preceding comments. Members Present: Larry McNiel, Pam Stewart, Nancy Fong Staff Planner: Emily Wimer The Committee approved the project subject to the revisions below: 1. Provide an expanded paved area that encompasses a 6-foot depth of porch area. 2. Extend architectural features on the full length and all sides of the chimneys. 3. Provide the rural architectural "Madison" on lot 1. The applicant agreed to the conditions and the plans will be revised for Planning Commission • review. l.J • DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 8:00 p.m. Alan Warren March 19, 2002 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2001-00572 - HOGEL-IRELAND, INC. - A request to demolish and rebuild a fast food restaurant, with drive-thru facilities and indoor play area, totaling 4,751 square feet located at 9649 Foothill Boulevard in the Specialty Commercial District of Subarea 3, pursuant to Development Code Section 17.32.030E.1.a. - APN: 208-261-053. A Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts is being prepared for consideration. Design Parameters: The site is a few hundred feet west of Archibald Avenue on the south side of Foothill Boulevard. The area has a mixture of recent projects (on the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Archibald Avenue) and older, pre-city developments of varying size, character, and use. Directly across the street sits an old Route 66 era gas station structure. Within this context, McDonald's has proposed to rebuild a fast food restaurant, replacing one that was built around 1977. An important aspect of the proposal will be to provide features that comply with the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan policies and be compatible with the existing streetscape. Also, the proposal is calling for expanded operations with an indoor play area and two drive-thru lanes to be opened 24 hours. Staff Comments: The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion. • Maior Issues: The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this project. Please note that the applicant and staff are working on environmental noise issues as they relate to the double drive-thru lanes and 24-hour operation. W hile staff encourages resolution of design issues, it is recommended that authorization for the application be forwarded to the Planning Commission and not be granted until environmental issues can be resolved. Site Plan: The proposed reconstruction follows the same site layout as presently exhibited with the restaurant centered on the street frontage, drive aisle with parking flanking the sides, and the drive-thru lane(s) at the rear and east side. Based on the building area, 63 parking spaces are required which is provided on the Site Plan. The major building expansion is in the indoor play area that occupies the open landscaped area in front of the existing building. The property is within an activity area (Archibald Avenue intersection) of the Foothill Boulevard Districts that encourages the close proximity of buildings to the street. As such, the front portion of the indoor play area is 25 feet from the curb face in keeping with the setback provisions. 2. Architecture: Subarea 3 of the Foothill Boulevard Districts calls for "an intimately-scaled retail district that will help emphasize the quality of the pedestrian shopping experience." The proximity of the building from the street frontage helps to advance this architectural imagery. Features that have been designated to carry the imagery of the area include river rock, stucco walls, hip roofs and towers. The proposed building iricludes these features in a complementary manner. Staff is concerned regarding the minimal depth of the gable/tower features on three sides of the play area. Staff believes these features should present a more substantial depth from the play area wall. . The visible roof structures are proposed to be covered with metal. The Planning Commission _ has expressed concern over the execution of metal roofs previously approved along Foothill Boulevard. The Committee should take this into consideration before deciding on whether to DRC COMMENTS DRC2001-00572 - HOGEL-IRELAND, INC. • March 19, 2002 Page 2 recommend the use of metal roofs to the Commission. As of the drafting of these comments, a materials sample/color was not provided. The applicant will present the sample at the meeting and staff will be able to provide comments. Alternative roof materials should be discussed with the applicant. 3. The play area front wall exhibits significant amount of window area that will allow for clear viewing of the play area. Noting that play apparatus comes in many shapes and colors, the appearance of this portion of the building may not be as clean as portrayed if the glazing is not tinted as depicted on the color exhibits. Staff, therefore, recommends that the front windows be required to be tinted or partially opaque and that the total window area be reduced by deleting the glazed area at the "clearstory" level. 4. The allowance for reduced setbacks was established to encourage pedestrians to enter businesses from the sidewalks. An important aspect of this concept is to provide main/front entrances directly off the sidewalk area. Both of the "main" customer entrances are on the sides and do not present a significant feature to the front elevation. Staff recommends that a main entrance feature be provided in conjunction with one of the walkways to the side entrances. This can be in the form of an arched walk through or double rock column entry. Secondary Issues: Once all of the major issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues. 1. Staff recommends that the use of river rock should be increased, perhaps by providing additional rock treatment higher on the play area facade and replacing the file wainscot with a rock base. Also, the two drive-thru lane trellises should be extended into one feature. 2. The plan calls for a monument sign directly in front of the building, between the wall and the public right-of-way sidewalk. So that this feature does not detract and dominate the streetscape, staff recommends that it be limited to 4Yz feet in height and that the sign background be opaque, if it is internally illuminated. Perhaps the monument sign can be combined with an entry structure, as mentioned in item #4, at the east walkway. 3. There is a potential congestion situation due to the convergence of vehicle traffic at the east driveway entrance. Vehicles exiting the drive-thru lane immediately turn across incoming vehicles. If the vehicles exiting from the east driveway are backed up, drive-thru lane vehicles 'could block the drive aisle from incoming traffic. It is suggested that the drive-thru lane exit be located further southerly, further away from the east entry driveway. This would necessitate that the second drive-thru window would need to be located further southerly along the east elevation. This is also an area where pedestrians will be crossing to enterthe restaurantfrom the east side parking area. 4. The parking area drive aisle is 24 feet wide. This width complies with minimum Development Code standards, but should be increased to 26 feet for emergency fire apparatus, if required by the Fire District. 5. Create a strong entry statement with textured pavement at project entrances. • 6. Integrate screening for roof-mounted equipment into the building design (i.e., extend parapet walls) rather than have a "tacked-on" appearance. DRC COMMENTS DRC2001-00572 - HOGEL-IRELAND, INC. • March 19, 2002 Page 3 Policv Issues: The following items are a matter of Planning.Commission policy and should be incorporated into the project design without discussion. 1. Clearly delineate on-site pedestrian walkways with special pavement, landscaping, and lighting. 2. Provide buffer where site adjoins residential development; such as increased setbacks, height limited to one-story, and dense landscaping. 3. Screen parking areas from public view with mounding, landscaping, low walls, grade differentials, and building orientation. 4. Integrate screening for roof-mounted equipment into the building design (i.e., extend parapet walls) rather than have a "tacked-on" appearance. 5. Consider site amenities, such as walls, hardscape, streetfurniture, trash enclosures, lighting, and monument signs as part of the total architectural package for the project. 6. Maintain adequate sight lines for motorists at intersections and driveways. 7. Integrate signs into the architectural scheme. Indeed, the building itself can serve as a large and impressive sign. To achieve this effect, however, the individual signs on the facade must • reinforce the character of the building, not obscure it or detract from it. 8. Size of signs must be proportional to the scale of the building and the surface they are affixed to. Visually balance the sign area with the building mass and height rather than designing to the maximum standard. 10. Use individual letters rather than canister type signs. Recommendation: The Committee should provide direction to staff and the applicant regarding the design issues listed in this report. If the Committee concurs with staff suggestions for potential modifications, it is recommended that that they request the applicant to incorporate the Major, Secondary, and Policy Issues in the final design prior to review by the Planning Commission. The forwarding of the project to the Planning Commission should wait for an amended plan and resolution of the environmental processing regarding the noise issues. Design Review Committee Action: Members Present: Larry McNiel, Pam Stewart, Nancy Fong Staff Planner: Alan Warren At the meeting, the applicant presented some modifications to the architecture I response to staff comments, specifically relating to the roof material (tile instead of metal), adding a gable feature at • the drive-thru lane, and a few alternatives for an entry feature from Foothill Boulevard. The Committee advised the applicant of the importance of presenting a strong thematic architectural statement for the Archibald/Foothill Activity Center and that the proposal did not quite achieve such a statement. They stated that the individual elements of the architecture had merit, but that theydid DRC COMMENTS DRC2001-00572-HOGEL-IRELAND, INC. March 19, 2002 Page 4 not "come together" to produce a strong statement for the area. "Route 66"/winery architectural styles were encouraged. The Committee suggested that the applicant work with staff to enhance the architectural style, prior to coming back to the Committee with revisions. In response to the noise environmental issue, the Committee advised thatthe noise issue should be worked out, prior to going to the Planning Commission. The Committee gave accounts of similar situations in the community where noise problems caused the implementation of extensive mitigation processes for the City. The project was not approved, and the applicant was advised to work with staff to resolve the outstanding issues. C1 DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS • L~ MARCH 19, 2002 PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no public comments at this time. ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 8:35 p.m. Respectfully submitted, B Bu ecreta DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE MEETING • TUESDAY MARCH 19, 2002 7:00 P.M. RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER RAINS ROOM 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA REVISED 3-7-02 Committee Members: Larry McNiel Pam Stewart Nancy Fong Alternates: Peter Tolstoy Rich Macias John Mannerino CONSENT CALENDAR The following items are expected to be routine and non-controversial. Typically they are items such as plan revisions prepared in response to discussions at a previous meeting. NO ITEMS HAVE BEEN SUBMITTED PROJECT REVIEW ITEMS This is the time and place for the Committee to discuss and provide direction to an applicant regarding their development application. The following items do not legally require any public testimony, although the Committee may open the meeting for public input. 7:00 p.m. • (Kirt) ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AN CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2001- 00439 - LIFEWAY CHURCH -The development of a new church facility of approximately 41,300 square feet to include a sanctuary, educational facilities, a gymnasium, administrative offices, and storage on 5.03 acres of land in the Low Residential District (2 to 4 dwelling units per acres) located at the southeast corner of Vineyard Avenue and Calle del Prado -APN: 208-921-36. Related Files: DRC2001-00444. 7:20 p.m. (Doug) ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEWDRC2002-00040 - PANATTONI DEVELOPMENT - A request to construct a 176,870 square foot industrial building on 7.06 acres of land in the General Industrial District (Subarea 5), located east of Hermosa Avenue and north of 6th Street -APN: 209-231-12. 7:40 p.m (Emily) DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2001-00544 - (TT16021) - CRESTWOOD CORPORATION - A residential subdivision of 16single-family lots on 7.53 acres of land in the Low Residential District (2 to 4 dwelling units per acre) of the Etiwanda Specific Plan located at the northwest corner of East Avenue and the Southern Pacific Railroad right-of-way -APN: 227-121-30 and 43. Related file: Tree Removal Permit 99-23. 8:00 p.m. (Alan) ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2001-00572 - HOGEL-IRELAND, INC. - A request to demolish and rebuild a fast • food restaurant, with drive-thru facilities and indoor play area, totaling 4,751 square feet located at 9649 Foothill Boulevard in the Specialty Commercial District of Subarea 3, pursuant to Development Code Section 17.32.030E.1.a. - APN: 208-261-053. A Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts is being prepared for consideration. , DRC AGENDA March 19, 2002 • Page 2 PUBLIC COMMENTS This is the time and place for the general public to address the Committee. State law prohibits the Committee from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Committee may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are limited to five minutes per individual. ADJOURNMENT I, Melissa Andrewin, Office Specialist 11 for the City of Rancho Cucamonga, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on March 14, 2002, at least 72 hours prior to the meeting per Government Code Section 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga. • • DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 7:00 p.m. Kirt Coury March 19, 2002 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENTAN CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2001-00439-LIFEWAY CHURCH -The development of a new church facility of approximately 41,300 square feetto include a sanctuary, educational facilities, a gymnasium, administrative offices, and storage on 5.03 acres of land in the Low Residential District (2 to 4 dwelling units per acres) located at the southeast corner of Vineyard Avenue and Calle del Prado - APN: 208-921-36. Related Files: DRC2001-00444. PLANS WILL BE AVAILABLE AT THE MEETING Members Present: Staff Planner: Kirt Coury • • DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 7:20 p.m. Douglas Fenn March 19, 2002 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2002-00040 - PANATTONI DEVELOPMENT - A request to construct a 176,870 square foot industrial building on 7.06 acres of land in the General Industrial District (Subarea 5), located east of Hermosa Avenue and north of 6th Street - APN: 209-231-12. Design Parameters: The site is located on Hermosa Avenue, approximately 1,200 feet north of 6th Street. The site is vacant and slopes southerly at approximately 2 percent. The site is bordered on the south by vacant land (approved for industrial development DRC01-03 -Paragon), to the north is single-family residences and vacant land, to the west is vacant land and the General Motors warehouse distribution facility that is under construction, and to the east of the is the San Bernardino County Flood Control Channel. The applicant proposes to develop a multi tenant warehouse/distribution building with two office areas. The office area is located at separate ends of the building, and total approximately 6,000 square feet. The building's loading area will front onto Hermosa Avenue and will be screened by a 14-foot high combination of berming and screen wall. The screen wall will be architecturally integrated with the building design. The building incorporates two primary materials. The building will be concrete tilt-up painted gray, silver, and forest berry. Sandblasting is added to accent the office portion of the building. The • project incorporates a reflective glazing at the office areas to create a contrast. The building needs stronger 360-degree architectural details. Staff Comments: The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion. Maior Issues: The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this project: Provide stronger 360-degree architecture detailing on the building facade. Additional sandblasted concrete should be added. 2. Truck access to the loading area should be separated from the pedestrian vehicle access. 3. The screen wall along Hermosa Avenue should reflect the approved architectural detail of the project and a design that has recesses and horizontal movement. Secondary Issues: Once all of the major issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues: Decorative paving at the entrances off Hermosa Avenue should be added. 2. Because the proposed building backs up to a Regional Trail, upgrade landscaping by planting at least one tree per 30 linear of property boundary at the rear of the property. Also, look at planting a type of vine and/or shrub that would make the area more aesthetically appealing. • 3. Outdoor employee eating area(s) should be covered with a decorative trellis shade structure, and a screen wall minimum of 3 feet high should surround the eating area. DRC COMMENTS DRC2002-00040 - PANATTONI DEVELOPMENT • March 19, 2002 Page 2 4. Locate the bicycle parking closer to the office entrances of the building. 5. All wall-mounted light fixtures shall have light pointed downwards. Wall-pak type of light fixtures that produce glare must be avoided. Policy Issues: The following items are a matter of Planning Commission policy and should be incorporated into the project design without discussion: 1. Paint roll-up doors and service doors to match main building colors. 2. Provide tables and chairs for outdoor eating area. 3. Provide a gated entrance to the future Regional Trail. Suggest some type of wrought iron gate. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the applicant revise the development plan to address above identified issues and submit for further Committee review. Members Present: Staff Planner: Doug Fenn • n U • DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 7:40 p.m. Emily W imer March 19, 2002 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2001-00544 - (TT16021) - CRESTWOOD CORPORATION - A residential subdivision of 16single-family lots on 7.53 acres of land in the Low Residential District (2 to 4 dwelling units per acre) of the Etiwanda Specific Plan located at the northwest corner of East Avenue and the Southern Pacific Railroad right-of-way - APN: 227-121-30 and 43. Related file: Tree Removal Permit 99-23. Background: The map was recorded on March 6, 2002, and was reviewed by Design, Grading, and Technical Review Committees on September 14, and 15, 1999. The single access design was specifically designed with the Etiwanda Specific Plan overlay. A future stub-out street was provided at the southwestern portion of the tract to provide secondary access to the future development. Design Parameters The project consists of design review for a previously approved Tract 16021, which consists of 16 single- family lots. To the west is vacant property in the Very Low Residential District and to the east are single-family homes, which are also in the Very Low Residential District. The southerly boundary is bordered by Victoria Street, and to the north is bordered by a tree line and partial Community Trail. The property is currently vacant and slopes 2 to 5 percent. • There are 114 trees on or near the subject site. An arborist report recommends removal and replacement of the on-site windrows. The windrows on the northeast corner are outside of the project boundaries and are conditioned to not be damaged by the development. The project consists of three floor plans. Two of the three floor plans are single-story, and all provide athree-car garage. Eleven floor plans are proposed as single-story homes, and five of the floor plans are proposed as two-story homes. Square footage ranges from 2,242 square feet to 2,684 square feet. The project is located within the Etiwanda Specific Plan and the applicant has offset the footprint on the majority of the homes to provide the characteristics of Etiwanda. The project will provide the East Avenue theme wall as the tract boundary wall (stone pilasters with stucco walls and river rock planters). Staff Comments: The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion. Maior Issues: The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this project. The applicant has resolved and diligently worked with staff to resolve previous Major Issues. Secondary Issues: 1. Extend chimney elements (stucco, siding, etc.) on the entire height of chimney, all four sides • for a balanced appearance. 2. Because of the rural characteristics of Etiwanda Avenue, Elevation B ("Madison") shall be provided on Lot 1. DRC COMMENTS DRC2001-00544 - CRESTWOOD CORPORATION • March 19, 2002 Page 2 3. Lot 6 is a corner lot and can be seen from Brookfield Drive. Provide aone-story floor plan on Lot 6. 4. A minor exception has been submitted for the southern boundary wall, which has a maximum height of 8 feet. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the project, subject to the preceding comments. Members Present: Staff Planner: Emily Wimer • • • DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 8:00 p.m. Alan Warren March 19, 2002 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2001-00572 - HOGEL-IRELAND, INC. - A request to demolish and rebuild a fast food restaurant, with drive-thru facilities and indoor play area, totaling 4,751 square feet located at 9649 Foothill Boulevard in the Specialty Commercial District of Subarea 3, pursuant to Development Code Section 17.32.030E.1.a. - APN: 208-261-053. A Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts is being prepared for consideration. Design Parameters: The site is a few hundred feet west of Archibald Avenue on the south side of Foothill Boulevard. The area has a mixture of recent projects (on the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Archibald Avenue) and older, pre-city developments of varying size, character, and use. Directly across the street sits an old Route 66 era gas station structure. Within this context, McDonald's has proposed to rebuild a fast food restaurant, replacing one that was built around 1977. An important aspect of the proposal will be to provide features that comply with the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan policies and be compatible with the existing streetscape. Also, the proposal is calling for expanded operations with an indoor play area and two drive-thru lanes to be opened 24 hours. Staff Comments: The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion. • Maior Issues: The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this project. Please note that the applicant and staff are working on environmental noise issues as they relate to the double drive-thru lanes and 24-hour operation. W hile staff encourages resolution of design issues, it is recommended that authorization for the application be forwarded to the Planning Commission and not be granted until environmental issues can be resolved. Site Plan: The proposed reconstruction follows the same site layout as presently exhibited with the restaurant centered on the street frontage, drive aisle with parking flanking the sides, and the drive-thru lane(s) at the rear and east side. Based on the building area, 63 parking spaces are required which is provided on the Site Plan. The major building expansion is in the indoor play area that occupies the open landscaped area in front of the existing building. The property is within an activity area (Archibald Avenue intersection) of the Foothill Boulevard Districts that encourages the close proximity of buildings to the street. As such, the front portion of the indoor play area is 25 feet from the curb face in keeping with the setback provisions. 2. Architecture: Subarea 3 of the Foothill Boulevard Districts calls for "an intimately-scaled retail district that will help emphasize the quality of the pedestrian shopping experience." The proximity of the building from the street frontage helps to advance this architectural imagery. Features that have been designated to carry the imagery of the area include river rock, stucco walls, hip roofs and towers. The proposed building includes these features in a complementary manner. Staff is concerned regarding the minimal depth of the gable/tower features on three sides of the play area. Staff believes these features should present a more substantial depth from the play area wall. • The visible roof structures are proposed to be covered with metal. The Planning Commission has expressed concern over the execution of metal roofs previously approved along Foothill Boulevard. The Committee should take this into consideration before deciding on whether to DRC COMMENTS DRC2001-00572 - HOGEL-IRELAND, INC. • March 19, 2002 Page 2 recommend the use of metal roofs to the Commission. As of the drafting of these comments, a materials sample/color was not provided. The applicant will present the sample at the meeting and staff will be able to provide comments. Alternative roof materials should be discussed with the applicant. 3. The play area front wall exhibits significant amount of window area that will allow for clear viewing of the play area. Noting that play apparatus comes in many shapes and colors, the appearance of this portion of the building may not be as clean as portrayed if the glazing is not tinted as depicted on the color exhibits. Staff, therefore, recommends that the front windows be required to be tinted or partially opaque and that the total window area be reduced by deleting the glazed area at the "clearstory" level. The allowance for reduced setbacks was established to encourage pedestrians to enter businesses from the sidewalks. An important aspect of this concept is to provide main/front entrances directly off the sidewalk area. Both of the "main" customer entrances are on the sides and do not present a significant feature to the front elevation. Staff recommends that a main entrance feature be provided in conjunction with one of the walkways to the side entrances. This can be in the form of an arched walk through or double rock column entry. Secondary Issues: Once all of the major issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues. • 1. Staff recommends that the use of river rock should be increased, perhaps by providing additional rock treatment higher on the play area facade and replacing the file wainscot with a rock base. Also, the two drive-thru lane trellises should be extended into one feature. The plan calls for a monument sign directly in front of the building, between the wall and the public right-of-way sidewalk. So that this feature does not detract and dominate the streetscape, staff recommends that it be limited to 4Yz feet in height and that the sign background be opaque, if it is internally illuminated. Perhaps the monument sign can be combined with an entry structure, as mentioned in item #4, at the east walkway. There is a potential congestion situation due to the convergence of vehicle traffic at the east driveway entrance. Vehicles exiting the drive-thru lane immediately turn across incoming vehicles. If the vehicles exiting from the east driveway are backed up, drive-thru lane vehicles could block the drive aisle from incoming traffic. It is suggested that the drive-thru lane exit be located further southerly, further away from the east entry driveway. This would necessitate that the second drive-thru window would need to be located further southerly along the east elevation. This is also an area where pedestrians will be crossing to enter the restaurant from the east side parking area. 4. The parking area drive aisle is 24 feet wide. This width complies with minimum Development Code standards, but should be increased to 26 feet for emergency fire apparatus, if required by the Fire District. 5. Create a strong entry statement with textured pavement at project entrances. • 6. Integrate screening for roof-mounted equipment into the building design (i.e., extend parapet walls) rather than have a "tacked-on" appearance. DRC COMMENTS DRC2001-00572 - HOGEL-IRELAND, INC. • March 19, 2002 Page 3 Policy Issues: The following items are a matter of Planning Commission policy and should be incorporated into the project design without discussion. 1. Clearly delineate on-site pedestrian walkways with special pavement, landscaping, and lighting. _ 2. Provide buffer where site adjoins residential development; such as increased setbacks, height limited to one-story, and dense landscaping. 3. Screen parking areas from public view with mounding, landscaping, low walls, grade differentials, and building orientation. 4. Integrate screening for roof-mounted equipment into the building design (i.e., extend parapet walls) rather than have a "tacked-on" appearance. 5. Consider site amenities, such as walls, hardscape, street furniture, trash enclosures, lighting, and monument signs as part of the total architectural package for the project. 6. Maintain adequate sight lines for motorists at intersections and driveways. 7. Integrate signs into the architectural scheme. Indeed, the building itself can serve as a large and impressive sign. To achieve this effect, however, the individual signs on the facade must • reinforce the character of the building, not obscure it or detract from it. 8. Size of signs must be proportional to the scale of the building and the surface they are affixed to. 9. Visually balance the sign area with the building mass and height rather than designing to the maximum standard. 10. Use individual letters rather than canister type signs Recommendation: The Committee should provide direction to staff and the applicant regarding the design issues listed in this report. If the Committee concurs with staff suggestions for potential modifications, it is recommended that that they request the applicant to incorporate the Major, Secondary, and Policy Issues in the final design prior to review by the Planning Commission. The forwarding of the project to the Planning Commission should wait for an amended plan and resolution of the environmental processing regarding the noise issues. Desion Review Committee Action: Members Present: Staff Planner: Alan Warren n U DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE MEETING ACTION AGENDA AND MINUTES REVISED AGENDA MARCH 20, 2002 TUESDAY MARCH 5, 2002 7:00 P.M. RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER RAINS ROOM 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA n LJ Committee Members: Larry McNiel Alternates: Peter Tolstoy CONSENT CALENDAR Pam Stewart Nancy Fong Rich Macias John Mannerino The following items are expected to be routine and non-controversial. Typically they are items such as plan revisions prepared in response to discussions at a previous meeting. 7:00 p.m Emily ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEWDRC2001-00588 -HUGHES HOMES -The development of 17single-family lots on 5.1 acres of land in the Low Residential zone (2-4 dwellings per unit), located at 8387 19th Street - APN: 202-021-37. PROJECT REVIEW ITEMS This is the time and place for the Committee to discuss and provide direction to an applicant regarding their development application. The following items do not legally require any public testimony, although the Committee may open the meeting for public input. 7:10 p.m (Kirt) ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2001- 00439 - LIFEWAY CHURCH -The development of a new church facility of approximately 41,300 square feet to include a sanctuary, educational facilities, a gymnasium, administrative offices, and storage on 5.03 acres of land in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre), located at southeast corner of Vineyard Avenue and Calle del Prado - APN: 208-921-36. Related files: DRC2001-00444. 7:20 p.m. (Debra) TERRA VISTA PARK CREDIT SUMMARY - A report to the Committee on the status of the Park Implementation Agreement for the Terra Vista Community. ITEM CONTINUED TO MARCH 19 AT THE REQUEST OF THE APPLICANT PUBLIC COMMENTS This is the time and place for the general public to address the Committee. State law prohibits the Committee from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Committee may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are limited to five • minutes per individual. ADJOURNMENT CONSENT CALENDAR COMMENTS 7:00 p.m. Emily Wimer March 5, 2002 • ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2001-00588 -HUGHES HOMES -The development of 17single-family lots on 5.1 acres of land in the Low Residential zone (2-4 dwellings per unit), located at 8387 19th Street - APN: 202-021-37. Design Review Committee Action: Members Present: Larry McNiel, Pam Stewart Staff Planner: Emily Wimer The Committee reviewed the revised courtyard design at the meeting and recommended approval with the following conditions: 1. Add a column next to the side of the garage wall to complete the entry design for the courtyard. 2. The columns and low walls shall be of block material with the stucco surface. 3. The final design shall be subject to City Planner review and approval. C • DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 7:10 p.m. Kirt Coury March 5, 2002 • ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2001-00439 - LIFEWAYCHURCH -The development of a new church facilityof approximately41,300 square feet to include a sanctuary, educational facilities, a gymnasium, administrative offices, and storage on 5.03 acres of land in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre), located at southeast corner of Vineyard Avenue and Calle del Prado - APN: 208-921-36. Related files: DRC2001-00444. Design Parameters: The site is located at the southeast corner of Vineyard Avenue and Calle del Prado, across the street from Red Hill Park. The site is undeveloped with a substantial slope from west to east. The soil is undeveloped, covered with grasses, and with no mature trees. Single- familydwellings surround the property on the north and south. Immediately east of the site is vacant land. Access to the site will be through proposed drive approaches on Vineyard Avenue and Calle del Prado. The project consists of a master plan of 41,300 square feet of building area with sanctuary, storage, educational facilities, an office area, a fellowship hall, and a gymnasium. The buildings will be built on the 5.03 acres of land. The buildings will be self sufficient with independent access, parking and utility services. Finish materials for the proposed building exterior include pilastertexture, aluminum storefront windows, stained glass treatment, and a concrete file roof. The applicant proposes to develop the property in four phases. The first phase will include a sanctuary and office building fronting Vineyard Avenue and a parking lot on the east end of the site. Phase One is scheduled to be completed by the end of 2002. Building design approval is only being requested for Phase One, with the remainder phases only being master planned in terms of building, • parking, and access locations. Phase Two will consist of the construction of a two-story education building along Calle del Prado behind the sanctuary to be completed by 2006. Phase Three will include the construction of a fellowship hall behind the office building toward the south side of the site proposed to be completed by 2008. Phase Four will consist of a gymnasium to the east of Phase three after 2010. Staff Comments: The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion. Maior Issues: The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this project: The 45-foot Sanctuary Building Height -Reduce building height to comply with the 30-foot maximum building envelope of the Hillside Development Ordinance; therefore, a Variance application was submitted. Staff does not support such a Variance. All buildings are subject to the 30-foot maximum building envelope of the Hillside Development Ordinance and maximum height of the subject zone. The height is particularly troublesome because this portion of the building faces directly at the single-family residences on Calle Del Prado. 2. Architectural Style -The proposed architectural style is not compatible with, or sensitive to the "ranch style" surrounding single-family residential neighborhood. In particular, the large, flat wall planes and flat parapet lines would create too abrupt of a change in the neighborhood. The Development Code states, "a recognizable design theme shall be established, which is compatible with surrounding development. Subtle variations are encouraged, which provide visual interest but do not create abrupt changes causing discord in the overall character of the immediate neighborhood. It is not intended that one style of • architecture should be dominant but that individual structures shall create and enhance a high quality and harmonious community appearance. The Code further states "the architecture should consider compatibilitywithsurrounding character, including harmonious building style, form, size, color, material, and roofline." The Code also states, "provide roof lines which respond to the general design of other roofs along the street." DRC COMMENTS DRC2001-00439 - LIFEWAY CHURCH March 5, 2002 • Page 2 3. Provide more enhancements of north and east elevations of sanctuary including but not limited to, greater use of file roof forms and additional building materials. Secondan/ Issues: Once all of the major issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues: 1. Incorporate 30-inch by 30-inch pilasters into tubular steel fence consistent with materials used on the walls and buildings. 2. Proposed parking lot retaining walls shall be constructed with decorative materials. 3. Landscape berming, decorative low walls, shrub hedges, or combination thereof, shall be provided to screen parking areas from view of Vineyard Avenue. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the applicant revise the project and return for further Design Committee review. Design Review Committee Action: Members Present: Larry McNiel, Pam Stewart, Nancy Fong • Staff Planner: Kirt Coury The Committee directed the applicant to add the following: 1. The Committee supported the requested 45-foot building height variance and stated that it would be acceptable based on the reason that the increase height would only apply to a small portion of the building (at the northwest corner), and the angle of the roof would be characteristic with that of a church. 2. The Committee identified that the proposed architectural style of the church may not be consistent with the surrounding single-family neighborhood, but felt that added stacked stone elements, variation of the roof file color, additional landscaping, and modification of the building colors would soften the appearance of the building and make it more compatible to the immediate area. 3. Incorporate a second building material such as brick or cultured stone to add warmth to the proposed buildings. 4. Darken the proposed roof file color (at a minimum a shade darker in brown, rather than the proposed reddish/orange color). 5. Increase the proposed reveal expansions on building face to minimum of 3 to 4 inches. 6. Incorporate 30-inch by 30-inch pilasters into tubular steel fence consistent with materials used on the walls and buildings. • 7. Proposed parking lot retaining walls shall be constructed with decorative materials. Incorporate mural type theme on the large wall face surface, particularly at the courtyard plaza area. DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS MARCH 5, 2002 PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no public comments at this time. ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 8:20 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Brad Buller Secretary U • DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE MEETING • REVISED AGENDA FEBRUARY 25, 2002 TUESDAY MARCH 5, 2002 7:00 P.M. RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER RAINS ROOM 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA Committee Members: Larry McNiel Pam Stewart Nancy Fong Alternates: Peter Tolstoy Rich Macias John Mannerino CONSENT CALENDAR The following items are expected to be routine and non-controversial. Typically they are items such as plan revisions prepared in response to discussions at a previous meeting. NO ITEMS HAVE BEEN SUBMITTED PROJECT REVIEW ITEMS This is the time and place for the Committee to discuss and provide direction to an applicant regarding their development application. The following items do not legally require any public testimony, although the Committee may open the meeting for public input. • 7:00 p.m. (Kirt) ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2001- 00439 - LIFEWAY CHURCH -The development of a new church facility of approximately 41,300 square feet to include a sanctuary, educational facilities, a gymnasium, administrative offices, and storage on 5.03 acres of land in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre), located at southeast corner of Vineyard Avenue and Calle del Prado - APN: 208-921-36. Related files: DRC2001-00444. 7:20 p.m. (Debra) TERRA VISTA PARK CREDIT SUMMARY- A report to the Committee on the status of the Park Implementation Agreement for the Terra Vista Community. ITEM CONTINUED TO MARCH 19 AT THE REQUEST OF THE APPLICANT PUBLIC COMMENTS This is the time and place for the general public to address the Committee. State law prohibits the Committee from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Committee may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are limited to five minutes per individual. ADJOURNMENT • 1, Mary Lou Gragg, Office Specialist II for the City of Rancho Cucamonga, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on February 28, 2002, at least 72 hours prior to the meeting per Government Code Section 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga. DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 7:00 p.m. Kirt Coury March 5, 2002 • ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2001-00439 - LIFEW AY CHU RCH -The development of a new church facility of approximately 41,300 square feet to include a sanctuary, educational facilities, a gymnasium, administrative offices, and storage on 5.03 acres of land in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre), located at southeast corner of Vineyard Avenue and Calle del Prado - APN: 208-921-36. Related files: DRC2001-00444. Design Parameters: The site is located at the southeast corner of Vineyard Avenue and Calle del Prado, across the street from Red Hill Park. The site is undeveloped with a substantial slope from west to east. The soil is undeveloped, covered with grasses, and with no mature trees. Single- familydwellings surround the property on the north and south. Immediately east of the site is vacant land. Access to the site will be through proposed drive approaches on Vineyard Avenue and Calle del Prado. The project consists of a master plan of 41,300 square feet of building area with sanctuary, storage, educational facilities, an office area, a fellowship hall, and a gymnasium. The buildings will be built on the 5.03 acres of land. The buildings will be self sufficient with independent access, parking and utility services. Finish materials for the proposed building exterior include pilastertexture, aluminum storefront windows, stained glass treatment, and a concrete file roof. The applicant proposes to develop the property in four phases. The first phase will include a sanctuary and office building fronting Vineyard Avenue and a parking lot on the east end of the site. Phase One is scheduled to be completed by the end of 2002. Building design approval is only being requested for Phase One, with the remainder phases only being master planned in terms of building, • parking, and access locations. Phase Two will consist of the construction of a two-story education building along Calle del Prado behind the sanctuary to be completed by 2006. Phase Three will include the construction of a fellowship hall behind the office building toward the south side of the site proposed to be completed by 2008. Phase Four will consist of a gymnasium to the east of Phase three after 2010. Staff Comments: The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion. Maior Issues: The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this project: The 45-foot Sanctuary Building Height -Reduce building height to comply with the 30-foot maximum building envelope of the Hillside Development Ordinance; therefore, a Variance application was submitted. Staff does not support such a Variance. All buildings are subject to the 30-foot maximum building envelope of the Hillside Development Ordinance and maximum height of the subject zone. The height is particularly troublesome because this portion of the building faces directly at the single-family residences on Calle Del Prado. 2. Architectural Style -The proposed architectural style is not compatible with, or sensitive to the "ranch style" surrounding single-family residential neighborhood. In particular, the large, flat wall planes and flat parapet lines would create too abrupt of a change in the neighborhood. The Development Code states, "a recognizable design theme shall be established, which is compatible with surrounding development. Subtle variations are encouraged, which provide visual interest but do not create abrupt changes causing discord in the overall character of the immediate neighborhood. It is not intended that one style of • architecture should be dominant but that individual structures shall create and enhance a high quality and harmonious community appearance. The Code further states "the architecture should consider compatibility with surrounding character, including harmonious building style, form, size, color, material, and roofline." The Code also states, "provide roof lines which respond to the general design of other roofs along the street." DRC COMMENTS DRC2001-00439- LIFEWAY CHURCH March 5, 2002 • Page 2 3. Provide more enhancements of north and east elevations of sanctuary including but not limited to, greater use of file roof forms and additional building materials. Secondary Issues: Once all of the major issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues: Incorporate 30-inch by 30-inch pilasters into tubular steel fence consistent with materials used on the walls and buildings. Proposed parking lot retaining walls shall be constructed with decorative materials. 3. Landscape berming, decorative low walls, shrub hedges, or combination thereof, shall be provided to screen parking areas from view of Vineyard Avenue. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the applicant revise the project and return for further Design Committee review. Design Review Committee Action: Members Present: • Staff Planner: Kirt Coury • ~Y F~, 4:' lv i • O S s .---, ~~ ,_ .,~~ _.~. ~:: a ~~ ~~z1k~1L„~,.~ .II *.- ~. 5 a Z O u ~. ,~~{. ~~ ti~~~` '.'~..; ~rr~ ~Mt ~kif~4 vd i~~ Q J W F- ~.. ~: 0 0:~~ . ~.. +~ ~_. DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS • 7:20 p.m. Debra Meier March 5, 2002 TERRA VISTA PARK CREDIT SUMMARY - A report to the Committee on the status of the Park Implementation Agreement for the Terra Vista Community. PLANS WILL BE AVAILABLE. Design Review Committee Action: Members Present: Staff Planner: Debra Meier \J u