The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2003/09/30 - Agenda PacketDESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE MEETING ACTION AGENDA AND MINUTES • TUESDAY SEPTEMBER 30, 2003 7:00 P.M. RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER RAINS ROOM 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA Committee Members: Cristine McPhail Pam Stewart Nancy Fong Alternates: Rich Macias Richard Fletcher Larry McNiel CONSENT CALENDAR The following items are expected to be routine and non-controversial. Typically they are items such as plan revisions prepared in response to discussions at a previous meeting. NO ITEMS HAVE BEEN SUBMITTED PROJECT REVIEW ITEMS This is the time and place for the Committee to discuss and provide direction to an applicant regarding their development application. The following items do not legally require any public testimony, although the Committee may open the meeting for public input. 7:00 p.m. • (BrenUJoe) DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2003-00843 - JC PENNY'S - A request to construct atwo-story, 133,000 square foot department store (JC Penny's) including hair salon, portrait studio, and optical department within the Victoria Gardens Regional Center in the Mixed Use District of the Victoria Community Plan, located north of Foothill Boulevard, south of Church Street, between Day Creek Boulevard and the I-15 Freeway -APN: 0227-262-35, 36, and 38; 0227-171-22 and 23; 0227-201030, 33, 35, and 36; 0227-211-24, 39, and 40 thru 43. 7:20 p.m. (Debra/Rene) TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16512 - KB HOME - A proposed subdivision of 12.19 acres into 3 lots for Condominium purposes in the Medium-High Residential District (14-24 dwelling units per acre), located at the northeast corner of Milliken Avenue and Church Street within the Terra Vista Community Plan -APN: 0227-151-65, 73, 74, 75, and 0227-811-03. Related Files: Development Review DRC2003-00394, General Plan Amendment DRC2003-00395 and Terra Vista Community Plan Amendment DRC2003-00396. On July 16, 2003, the City Council adopted a Mitigated Negative Declaration for a Purchase and Sale Agreement, General Plan Amendment DRC2003-00395, Terra Vista Community Plan Amendment DRC2003-00396, Development Review DRC2003-00394 and this Tentative Tract Map. The California Environmental Quality Act provides that no further environmental review or Negative Declaration is required for subsequent projects within the scope of the previous Negative Declaration. • DRC AGENDA September30, 2003 Page 2 • (Debra/Rene) DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2003-00394 - KB HOME -The Development Review of building elevations and site plan for 168 Condominium units on 12.19 acres of land in the Medium-High Residential District (14-24 dwelling units per acre), located at the northeast corner of Milliken Avenue and Church Street within the Terra Vista Community Plan -APN: 0227-151-65, 73, 74, 75, and 227-811-03. Related files: General Plan Amendment DRC2003-00395, Terra Vista Community Plan Amendment DRC2003-00396, and Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16512. On July 16, 2003, the City Council adopted a Mitigated Negative Declaration for a Purchase and Sale Agreement, General Plan Amendment DRC2003-00395, Terra Vista Community Plan Amendment DRC2003-00396, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16512 and this Development Review. The California Environmental Quality Act provides that no further environmental review or Negative Declaration is required for subsequent projects within the scope of the previous Negative Declaration. 7:40 p.m. (Debra/Joe) ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2003-00638 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES -The design review of site plan and building elevations for a proposed tri-plex condominium project consisting of 186 attached dwelling units on 18.48 acres (21.38 gross acres) of land, located at the southwest corner of Day Creek Boulevard and Church Street in the Mixed-Use/Medium Residential District (8-14 dwelling units peracre) of the Victoria Arbors Village of the Victoria Community Plan -APN: 0227-201-37, 40 and portion of 41. Related Files: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16612 (Debra/Joe) ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16612 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES - A proposed one-lot subdivision for condominium purposes consisting of 18.48 acres (21.38 gross acres) of land, located at the southwest corner of Day Creek Boulevard and Church Street in the Mixed-Use/Medium Residential District (8-14 dwelling units per acre) of the Victoria Arbors Village of the Victoria Community Plan - APN: 0227-201-37, 40 and portion of 41. Related File: Development Review DRC2003-00638. PUBLIC COMMENTS This is the time and place for the general public to address the Committee. State law prohibits the Committee from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Committee may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are limited to five minutes per individual. ADJOURNMENT DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS • 7:00 p.m. Brent Le Count September 30, 2003 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2003-00843 - JC PENNY'S - A request to construct atwo-story, 133,000 square foot department store (JC Penny's) including hair salon, portrait studio, and optical department within the Victoria Gardens Regional Center in the Mixed Use District of the Victoria Community Plan, located north of Foothill Boulevard, south of Church Street, between Day Creek Boulevard and the I-15 Freeway - APN: 0227-262-35, 36, and 38; 0227-171-22 and 23; 0227-201030, 33, 35, and 36; 0227-211-24, 39, and 40 thru 43. Design Parameters: The JCPenny building will be the western-most of the three anchor tenants (Robinson's May, Macy's being the other two). It, along with three shop buildings, will occupy the block consisting of South Mainstreet to the north, Versailles Street to the south, Monticello Avenue to the west and Monet Avenue to the east. Due to it's location, JCPenny will be the closest and most visible anchor tenant relative to Day Creek Boulevard (a large parking field and Monticello Avenue are located between Day Creek Boulevard and the building). W hile the building presents a very modern style, relying heavily on color, reveal pattern, and file wainscoting for visual interest, it should be noted that the west, north, and east sides of the building will have smaller mall shop buildings attached thereby fostering significant modulation of building mass and visual interest. The loading dock (including the trash compactor) is proposed to be located on the southwest corner of the building, facing Day Creek Boulevard. High decorative screen walls flank the loading dock with large "L" shaped columns and overhead structures on the western ends of the screen walls (closest to the street). A dense double row of Canary Island Pines (12 feet on center) will run along the south side of the building and loading dock and both north and south walls of the loading dock will have creeping fig vines planted along the base. The northern wall will have a 2-foot wide planter along its base to accommodate the creeping fig vines as well as ligustrum texanum shrubs. All four sides of the building will have double doorfoyertype pedestrian entrances all of which utilize glass, colored stucco, 5-foot high granite file wainscoting, and horizontal and vertical change of building plane to provide visual interest and a sense of arrival. Also, the north and east entries will have 39-foot tall by 13-foot wide obelisk-like columns set 21 feet away from the building face and a large overhead trellis connects the building with the columns. The west entrance lacks the grand column/trellis feature but will be flanked by dense planting of jacaranda trees. Roof-mounted equipment is proposed to be concealed behind raised decorative parapets and a sight line study shows that the equipment will not be visible from the surrounding area including the I-15 Freeway even though the freeway is elevated in this area. Finally, the entire perimeter. of the building is proposed to be at the same grade level so that customers do not have to go up or down steps. Staff Comments: The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion. Secondary Issues: Once all of the major issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues: Provide granite file to match wainscoting or similar highly decorative material on the building projections at the four entry points to the building. The intent is to convey a richer mix of materials as well as enhance the entry experience. 2. Coordinate with mall developer to provide wider sidewalks. The sidewalks on the east, west, • and south sides of the building measure as narrow as 5 feet in width contrary to the strong pedestrian friendly nature of the mall development. Sidewalks 12- to 15-foot wide can easily be accomplished by eliminating large areas of turf/soil in the curb adjacent parkways and replacing with tree wells to accommodate street trees. DRC COMMENTS DRC2003-00843 - JC PENNY'S September 30, 2003 • Page 2 3. Eliminate northern-most drop off parking bay on Monticello Avenue as it does not appear oriented to building entry and forces the curb to building dimension down to 4 feet. Adjust southerly drop off parking bay and pedestrian walk across Monticello Avenue to align walk with west entrance of building. 4. Provide enhanced paving treatment in the driveway entrance to the loading dock area at the southwest corner of the building to maintain a high level of visual interest relative to the pedestrian experience for those walking by the dock area. 5. The column/canopy treatment on the west ends of the loading dock screen walls help draw the eye away from the more utilitarian interior of the dock area. Further this effect by providing an overhead connection between the screen walls. It is recognized that there is potential for conflict with compactor servicing but an overhead solution was successfully designed for the Macy's building in the mall. 6. Coordinate with the mall developer to provide dense landscaping along the west side of Monticello Avenue to enhance the screening of the loading dock area from Day Creek Boulevard and east bound Versailles Street. 7. Building wall reveals shall be of sufficient width and depth to provide strong shadows to break up building surfaces into the square and rectangular shapes shown on elevations. • Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Committee forward the project on to the Planning Commission subject to the above comments and any other comments the Committee may have. Design Review Committee Action: Members Present: Chris McPhail, Larry McNeil, Dan Coleman Staff Planner: Brent Le Count The Committee recommended approval of the project subject to staff's comments and the following additional comments: 1. It is not necessary to cover the entire entrance towers with granite tile. Instead, treat the inner return walls with a faux granite finish and surround the inner edge of the entry towers with a decorative trim/molding. 2. Provide a decorative cornice around all four sides of the building but not on the entry towers. The cornice(s) shall be treated with the same faux granite finish as on the inside walls of the entrance towers. 3. Widen the pedestrian entryway on the south side of the building by providing 5-foot wide concrete sidewalk between back of curb and main sidewalk along the south side for pedestrian use aligning with each drive aisle to the south. • 4. Provide a trellis like feature over the entry to the loading dock to provide a source of visual interest to draw the eye away from the more utilitarian innards of the dock area. It is recognized that any overhead structure will have to be located high enough to allow clearance for servicing of the trash compactor. Applicant to determine height requirements for such an overhead structure for further review by the Committee. DRC COMMENTS DRC2003-00843-JC PENNY'S • September 30, 2003 Page 3 Provide red colored trumpet vines along the south building wall; however, do not plantvines on granite veneer flanking south building entry. The 3-inch reveals were acceptable. The item shall be brought back for verification of the above items. The Committee requested to see perspective sketches orcross-sections depicting how parking lot landscaping will screen views of the loading dock from further west (Day Creek Boulevard), revised elevations/perspectives to portray the faux granite and entry surround design and a sample of the faux granite material (if a physical sample cannot be readily obtained, a color photograph(s) of such amaterial/treatment will suffice). The applicant agreed to make the appropriate changes and provide revised design materials accordingly. The item shall be scheduled for the October 14, 2003 Design Review Committee meeting as a Consent item. • • DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS . 7:20 p.m. Debra Meier September 30, 2003 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16512 - KB HOME - A proposed subdivision of 12.19 acres into 3 lots for Condominium purposes in the Medium-High Residential District (14-24 dwelling units per acre), located at the northeast corner of Milliken Avenue and Church Street within the Terra Vista Community Plan -APN: 0227-151-65, 73, 74, 75, and 0227-811-03. Related Files: Development Review DRC2003-00394, General Plan Amendment DRC2003-00395 and Terra Vista Community Plan Amendment DRC2003-00396. On July 16, 2003, the City Council adopted a Mitigated Negative Declaration for a Purchase and Sale Agreement, General Plan Amendment DRC2003-00395, Terra Vista Community Plan Amendment DRC2003-00396, Development Review DRC2003-00394 and this Tentative Tract Map. The California Environmental Quality Act provides that no further environmental review or Negative Declaration is required for subsequent projects within the scope of the previous Negative Declaration. - DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2003-00394 - KB HOME -The Development Review of building elevations and site plan for 168 Condominium units on 12.19 acres of land in the Medium-High Residential District (14-24 dwelling units per acre), located at the northeast corner of Milliken Avenue and Church Street within the Terra Vista Community Plan -APN: 0227-151-65, 73, 74, 75, and 227-811-03. Related files: General Plan Amendment DRC2003-00395, Terra Vista Community Plan Amendment DRC2003-00396, and Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16512. On July 16, 2003, the City Council adopted a Mitigated Negative Declaration for a Purchase and Sale Agreement, General Plan Amendment DRC2003-00395, Terra Vista Community Plan Amendment DRC2003-00396, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16512 and this Development Review. The California Environmental Quality Act provides that no further environmental review or Negative Declaration is required for • subsequent projects within the scope of the previous Negative Declaration. Project Density: 14 Dwelling Units Per Acre. Design Parameters: The project site is an awkwardly shaped piece of land surrounding the new Storage West mini-storage facility. Surrounding land uses include Milliken Park on the north boundary; Church Street forms the south boundary of the site; with Milliken Avenue forming the west boundary of the project. Existing land uses on the south side of Church Street includes the Rancho San Antonio Medical Center, and on the west side of Milliken Avenue are the Del Mar Apartments. The recently constructed Storage West mini-storage facility is located along Milliken Avenue in the midst of the proposed project; therefore, the existing structures establish the design theme for the proposed residential structures. The mini-storage building was constructed with a 5-foot minimum setback Tine at the south and east property lines (these boundaries were landscaped with the development, the north boundary was delayed due to the relocation of the Terra Vista Trail). The residential project will maintain all landscaping along the perimeter of the existing mini-storage buildings, thereby eliminating the need for fencing at the property boundary line surrounding the mini-storage. Emergency access points that were established with the approval of the mini-storage will be respected and developed by the proposed residential project. The proposed residential project will be providing a minimum of 5 feet of landscaping along the southerly boundary of existing improvements in Milliken Park, and processing a separate Lot Line Adjustment to shift the boundary of the park approximately 5 feet southerly. Open fencing will be utilized along the project boundary with the Park site. • The project is not gated, and berming is proposed along the perimeter streets to screen parking and garage exposures. Open tubular steel fencing is used along the street frontage side and rear property boundaries. DRC COMMENTS SUBTT16512 - KB HOME September 30, 2003 Page 2 The site slopes gently from north to south at approximately atwo-percent gradient. The site is covered with non-native grasses that are routinely disturbed forweed control. There are no unique features on-site, nor any existing trees. Staff Comments: The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion. Maior Issues: The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this project: NONE Secondary Issues: Once all of the major issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues: 1. ARCHITECTURE: The project design theme was established in order to incorporate the existing mini-storage facility, Storage W est, into the streetscape of the proposed residential project. Colored elevations and photographs of the existing structures will be provided at the Committee for comparison. The following changes are recommended: Staff recommends that the building color scheme of the proposed project match (or compliment) the color scheme used on Storage West. In addition, staff suggests that other minor details be incorporated into the residential structures, such as the decorative quatrefoil. • 2. Redesign elevations and patio fencing per Noise Study. The Noise Study prepared for this project indicates that an 5 to 8-foot high sound barriers are needed at all first floor patios and a 5 to 7-foot high barriers required for all second floor balconies. The project design indicates 4-foot 8-inch high patio walls and open wrought iron railings. Staff recommends using Lexan panels where appropriate, rather than stucco walls, for sound attenuation. For balconies, Lexan could be placed behind the wrought iron railings. 3. LANDSCAPING: Staff had suggested that the applicant use a combination of walls and landscaping to screen open parking and garage entries that are exposed to view of the public street. The applicant has provided across-Section A-A illustrating the use of earthen berms and landscaping to provide the desired screening, rather them incorporate additional walls into the streetscape. This may be acceptable, provided that a minimum height is established for the earthen berm. 4. FENCING: An open tubular steel fencing is proposed at the shared property line with the Milliken Park's parking lot. For privacy, and to minimize light glare, it is recommended that this be a solid slump block wall. 5. ACCESS: As proposed, the entrances to the project do not meet City design guidelines for gated entrances. Should the condominium Homeowners' Association request gated entrances in the future; the developer may want to provide adequate landscaped areas (with required setbacks) at this time for future opportunities. The north Milliken Avenue entry will be particularly challenging to design. Policy Issues: The following items are a matter of Planning Commission policy and should be • incorporated into the project design without discussion: Vary garage door design pattern. Include windows in garage doors. DRC COMMENTS SUBTT16512 - KB HOME • September 30, 2003 Page 3 Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval subject to working out these issues with staff prior to scheduling for Planning Commission for review and approval. Design Review Committee Action: Members Present: Christine McPhail, Larry McNeil, Nancy Fong Staff Planner: Debra Meier The Committee discussed the secondary issues with the applicant. The applicant concurred with the staff comments pertaining to walls/fencing, landscaping/screening, and all the requirements pertaining to noise attenuation. The applicant suggested that the architectural color scheme could be enhanced through the use of variations in color to the building plans and modifications to the color scheme will be coordinated with staff. The Committee agreed. The applicant indicated that they have chosen not to gate the project, therefore the driveways will not be redesigned to accommodate gated entries. The Committee agreed provided disclosure given to buyers. The Committee recommended that the applicant coordinate all minor modifications with staff, and • recommended approval to the Planning Commission. • DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS • 7:40 p.m. Debra Meier September 30, 2003 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2003-00638 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES -The design review of site plan and building elevations for a proposed tri- plex condominium project consisting of 186 attached dwelling units on 18.48 acres (21.38 gross acres) of land, located at the southwest corner of Day Creek Boulevard and Church Street in the Mixed-Use/Medium Residential District (8-14 dwelling units per acre) of the Victoria Arbors Village of the Victoria Community Plan -APN: 0227-201-37, 40 and portion of 41. Related Files: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16612 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16612 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES - A proposed one-lot subdivision for condominium purposes consisting of 18.48 acres (21.38 gross acres) of land, located at the southwest corner of Day Creek Boulevard and Church Street in the Mixed-Use/Medium Residential District (8-14 dwelling units peracre) of the Victoria Arbors Village of the Victoria Community Plan -APN: 0227-201-37, 40 and portion of 41. Related File: Development Review DRC2003-00638. Design Parameters: The proposed project is in the southern portion of the Victoria Arbors Village of the Victoria Planned Community. The land use designation north of the site is Mixed-Use/Single- Family Residential (Standard Pacific); south of the site is Mixed-Use/High Density Residential (Fairfield Apartments); east of the site is Mixed-Use/Medium High Residential (Lewis Companies); and west of the site is the Southern California Edison (SCE) corridor and the Day Creek Channel. The south boundary of the site interfaces with the Fairfield Apartment application for Chambray • (DRC2003-00337), with a private roadway providing shared access between the two projects. Staff Comments: The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion. Site Planning: a) Relocate one or both recreation areas to a more central location to be more convenient for residents. b) Revise the layout to eliminate isolated triplexes that do not relate well to neighbors or are surrounded by drive aisles and garage doors -examples include buildings 10, 27, 33, and 49. c) Provide a continuous pedestrian walkway around the perimeter of the entire project with connections to Church Street, Day Creek Boulevard, and the regional trail in the (SCE) corridor. d) Construct a Bus Shelter on Day Creek Boulevard outside of the public right-of-way. The shelter should be located facing Day Creek Boulevard, between 120-feet and 300-feet south of the corner cutoff of Church Street (The placement of the shelter does not effect setback of the residential buildings). e) One mailbox structure will be required in a central location in accordance with Postmaster standards; consider incorporating a mailbox portal as an integral • component of the pool building for example. The pedestrian circulation, both internally and externally, should be cohesive and deliberate; including pedestrian linkage to the regional trail within the SCE corridor and the Day Creek Boulevard walkways that allow circulation throughout the Village. DRC COMMENTS DRC2003-00638 & SUBTT16612 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES • September 30, 2003 Page 2 2. Building Design/Architecture: a) At least 60 percent of the units shall be designed with porches (covered by roof) as required by Victoria Arbors Master Plan. In addition, a maximum of 40 percent of units are allowed to use a courtyard instead of a porch. b) Suggestions to enhance each architectural style are: French Country Style -Introduce brick, stone, or horizontal siding as a major element. French Farmhouse Style -The stonework should be extended to include the entire fireplace/chimney. c) Provide a typical elevation of the application of the noise attenuation methods (i.e. the Lexan panels) for the units that face Day Creek Boulevard. The Victoria Arbors Village and the adjacent Victoria Gardens Regional Mall area 'special place' incorporating the unique design guidelines of the Victoria Arbors Master Plan. Building product shall be designed especially for the site and the setting within the Community Plan. 3. W alls: If exterior tract boundary walls are utilized for the project they shall be Victoria Arbors theme walls (see "Exhibit 38" Victoria Arbors Master Plan); the walls along Day Creek • Boulevard shall follow the Day Creek Boulevard theme wall (see "Exhibit 39"Victoria Arbors Master Plan); and the walls along Church Street shall be Victoria theme walls (see "Exhibit 40" Victoria Arbors Master Plan), as detailed in the Landscape Plans. The noise study indicates that 6-foot sound attenuation barriers are required along street frontages, however, perimeter walls along Day Creek Boulevard and Church Street is not the desired streetscape option; therefore, staff recommends a combination of berms and Lexan panels between pilasters to provide noise attenuation. 3. Landscape Plan: a) The landscape palette shall be reflective of the French architectural theme. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that all issues identified above be satisfied to the satisfaction of the Committee, prior to recommending review and' approval by the Planning Commission. Design Review Committee Action: Members Present: Christine McPhail, Larry McNeil, Dan Coleman Staff Planner: Debra Meier Following the order of the outline provided in the staff commends above, the Committee discussed each issue with the applicant, and the result is noted below: • 1. Site Planning: a) The recreation facilities are acceptable as proposed by the applicant. DRC COMMENTS DRC2003-00638 & SUBTT16612 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES • September 30, 2003 Page 3 b) The neighborhood arrangement was found to be acceptable as proposed by the applicant. c) The pedestrian walkway system, including internal paseos and external connections, were found to be appropriate as proposed by the applicant. d) The applicant agreed to design and construct the bus shelter on Day Creek Boulevard. The plans and location will be determined, priorto Planning Commission approval. e) The applicant agreed to develop the mailbox structures as directed by the Postmaster, the final design shall be determined, prior to Planning Commission approval. 2. Building Design/Architecture: a) The architect provided a table that illustrated compliance with the percentages of porches and courtyards per the Victoria Gardens Master Plan. b) The architecture of the French Farmhouse Elevations were approved as proposed; the Committee, did however, recommend that a second building material be added to the French Country Elevation. The modification will be subject to review by the • Committee as a Consent item. c) The applicant will work with staff to provide all appropriate noise attenuation along Day Creek Boulevard and Church Street. 3. Walls: The applicant concurred with the staff recommendation of eliminating the solid wall along the street frontages. Fences between buildings are acceptable as desired. 4. Landscape Plan: The Committee recommended that the Landscape Plan be modified to be reflective of a French theme, including more detail, color, and "splash." The garage "alleys" shall be enhanced by provided wire pocket between garage doors, and providing color/patterned concrete at the entry to each garage "alley." In conclusion, the Committee recommended approval of the project subject to Design Review Committee review of the recommended modifications. C~ DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS SEPTEMBER 30, 2003 PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no public comments at this time. ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 9:10 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Brad u er Secretary r1 LJ • • DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE MEETING TUESDAY SEPTEMBER 30, 2003 .7:00 P.M. RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER RAINS ROOM 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA Committee Members: Cristine McPhail Pam Stewart Alternates: Rich Macias Richard Fletcher CONSENT CALENDAR Nancy Fong Larry McNiel The following items are expected to be routine and non-controversial. Typically they are items such as plan revisions prepared in response to discussions at a previous meeting. NO ITEMS HAVE BEEN SUBMITTED PROJECT REVIEW ITEMS This is the time and place for the Committee to discuss and provide direction to an applicant regarding their development application. The following items do not legally require any public • testimony, although the Committee may open the meeting for public input. 7:00 p.m (BrenUJoe) DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2003-00843 - JC PENNY'S - A request to construct atwo-story, 133,000 square foot department store (JC Penny's) including hair salon, portrait studio, and optical department within the Victoria Gardens Regional Center in the Mixed Use District of the Victoria Community Plan, located north of Foothill Boulevard, south of Church Street, between Day Creek Boulevard and the I-15 Freeway -APN: 0227-262-35, 36, and 38; 0227-171-22 and 23; 0227-201030, 33, 35, and 36; 0227-211-24, 39, and 40 thru 43. 7:20 p.m. (Debra/Rene) TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16512 - KB HOME - A proposed subdivision of 12.19 acres into 3 lots for Condominium purposes in the Medium-High Residential District (14-24 dwelling units per acre), located at the northeast corner of Milliken Avenue and Church Street within the Terra Vista Community Plan -APN: 0227-151-65, 73, 74, 75, and 0227-811-03. Related Files: Development Review DRC2003-00394, General Plan Amendment DRC2003-00395 and Terra Vista Community Plan Amendment DRC2003-00396. On July 16, 2003, the City Council adopted a Mitigated Negative Declaration for a Purchase and Sale Agreement, General Plan Amendment DRC2003-00395, Terra Vista Community Plan Amendment DRC2003-00396, Development Review DRC2003-00394 and this Tentative Tract Map. The California Environmental Quality Act provides that no further environmental review or Negative Declaration is required for subsequent projects within the scope of the previous Negative Declaration. • DRC AGENDA September30, 2003 Page 2 (Debra/Rene) DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2003-00394 - KB HOME -The Development Review of building elevations and site plan for 168 Condominium units on 12.19 acres of land in the Medium-High Residential District (14-24 dwelling units per acre), located at the northeast corner of Milliken Avenue and Church Street within the Terra Vista Community Plan -APN: 0227-151-65, 73, 74, 75, and 227-811-03. Related files: General Plan Amendment DRC2003-00395, Terra Vista Community Plan Amendment DRC2003-00396, and Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16512. On July 16, 2003, the City Council adopted a Mitigated Negative Declaration for a Purchase and Sale Agreement, General Plan Amendment DRC2003-00395, Terra Vista Community Plan Amendment DRC2003-00396, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16512 and this Development Review. The California Environmental Quality Act provides that no further environmental review or Negative Declaration is required for subsequent projects within the scope of the previous Negative Declaration. 7:40 p.m. (Debra/Joe) ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2003-00638 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES -The design review of site plan and building elevations for a proposed tri-plex condominium project consisting of 186 attached dwelling units on 18.48 acres (21.38 gross acres) of land, located at the southwest corner of Day Creek Boulevard and Church Street • in the Mixed-Use/Medium Residential District (8-14 dwelling units peracre) of the Victoria Arbors Village of the Victoria Community Plan -APN: 0227-201-37, 40 and portion of 41. Related Files: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16612 (Debra/Joe) ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16612 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES - A proposed one-lot subdivision for condominium purposes consisting of 18.48 acres (21.38 gross acres) of land, located at the southwest corner of Day Creek Boulevard and Church Street in the Mixed-Use/Medium Residential District (8-14 dwelling units per acre) of the Victoria Arbors Village of the Victoria Community Plan - APN: 0227-201-37, 40 and portion of 41. Related File: Development Review DRC2003-00638. PUBLIC COMMENTS This is the time and place for the general public to address the Committee. State law prohibits the Committee from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Committee may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are limited to five minutes per individual. ADJOURNMENT I, Mary Lou Gragg, Office Specialist 11 for the City of Rancho Cucamonga, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on September25, 2003 at least 72 hours prior to the meeting per Government Code Section 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho • Cucamonga. DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS • 7:00 p.m. Brent Le Count September 30, 2003 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2003-00843 - JC PENNY'S - A request to construct atwo-story, 133,000 square foot department store (JC Penny's) including hair salon, portrait studio, and optical department within the Victoria Gardens Regional Center in the Mixed Use District of the Victoria Community Plan, located north of Foothill Boulevard, south of Church Street, between Day Creek Boulevard and the I-15 Freeway - APN: 0227-262-35, 36, and 38; 0227-171-22 and 23; 0227-201030, 33, 35, and 36; 0227-211-24, 39, and 40 thru 43. Design Parameters: The JCPenny building will be the western-most of the three anchor tenants (Robinson's May; Macy's being the other two). It, along with three shop buildings, will occupy the block consisting of South Mainstreet to the north, Versailles Street to the south, Monticello Avenue to the west and Monet Avenue to the east. Due to it's location, JCPenny will be the closest and most visible anchor tenant relative to Day Creek Boulevard (a large parking field and Monticello Avenue are located between Day Creek Boulevard and the building). While the building presents a very modern style, relying heavily on color, reveal pattern, and file wainscoting for visual interest, it should be noted that the west, north, and east sides of the building will have smaller mall shop buildings attached thereby fostering significant modulation of building mass and visual interest. The loading dock (including the trash compactor) is proposed to be located on the southwest corner of the building, facing Day Creek Boulevard. High decorative screen walls flank the loading dock with large "L" shaped columns and overhead structures on the western ends of the screen walls (closest to the street). A dense double row of Canary Island Pines (12 feet on center) will run along • the south side of the building and loading dock and both north and south walls of the loading dock will have creeping fig vines planted along the base. The northern wall will have a 2-foot wide planter along its base to accommodate the creeping fig vines as well as ligustrum texanum shrubs. All four sides of the building will have double door foyer type pedestrian entrances all of which utilize glass, colored stucco, 5-foot high granite file wainscoting, and horizontal and vertical change of building plane to provide visual interest and a sense of arrival. Also, the north and east entries will have 39-foot tall by 13-foot wide obelisk-like columns set 21 feet away from the building face and a large overhead trellis connects the building with the columns. The west entrance lacks the grand column/trellis feature but will be flanked by dense planting of jacaranda trees. Roof-mounted equipment is proposed to be concealed behind raised decorative parapets and a sight line study shows that the equipment will not be visible from the surrounding area including the I-15 Freeway even though the freeway is elevated in this area. Finally, the entire perimeter of the building is proposed to be at the same grade level so that customers do not have to go up or down steps. Staff Comments: The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion. Secondary Issues: Once all of the major issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues: Provide granite file to match wainscoting or similar highly decorative material on the building projections at the four entry points to the building. The intent is to convey a richer mix of materials as well as enhance the entry experience. 2. Coordinate with mall developer to provide wider sidewalks. The sidewalks on the east, west, • and south sides of the building measure as narrow as 5 feet in width contrary to the strong pedestrian friendly nature of the mall development. Sidewalks 12- to 15-foot wide can easily be accomplished by eliminating large areas of turf/soil in the curb adjacent parkways and replacing with tree wells to accommodate street trees. DRC COMMENTS DRC2003-00843 - JC PENNY'S September 30, 2003 • Page 2 3. Eliminate northern-most drop off parking bay on Monticello Avenue as it does not appear oriented to building entry and forces the curb to building dimension down to 4 feet. Adjust southerly drop off parking bay and pedestrian walk across Monticello Avenue to align walk with west entrance of building. 4. Provide enhanced paving treatment in the driveway entrance to the loading dock area at the southwest corner of the building to maintain a high level of visual interest relative to the pedestrian experience for those walking by the dock area. 5. The column/canopy treatment on the west ends of the loading dock screen walls help draw the eye away from the more utilitarian interior of the dock area. Further this effect by providing an overhead connection between the screen walls. It is recognized that there is potential for conflict with compactor servicing but an overhead solution was successfully designed for the Macy's building in the mall. 6. Coordinate with the mall developer to provide dense landscaping along the west side of Monticello Avenue to enhance the screening of the loading dock area from Day Creek Boulevard and east bound Versailles Street. Building wall reveals shall be of sufficient width and depth to provide strong shadows to breakup building surfaces into the square and rectangular shapes shown on elevations. • Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Committee forward the project on to the Planning Commission subject to the above comments and any other comments the Committee may have. Design Review Committee Action: Members Present: Staff Planner: Brent Le Count C~ DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS • 7:20 p.m. Debra Meier September 30, 2003 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16512 - KB HOME - A proposed subdivision of 12.19 acres into 3 lots for Condominium purposes in the Medium-High Residential District (14-24 dwelling units per acre), located at the northeast corner of Milliken Avenue and Church Street within the Terra Vista Community Plan -APN: 0227-151-65, 73, 74, 75, and 0227-81 1-03. Related Files: Development Review DRC2003-00394, General Plan Amendment DRC2003-00395 and Terra Vista Community Plan Amendment DRC2003-00396. On July 16, 2003, the City Council adopted a Mitigated Negative Declaration for a Purchase and Sale Agreement, General Plan Amendment DRC2003-00395, Terra Vista Community Plan Amendment DRC2003-00396, Development Review DRC2003-00394 and this Tentative Tract Map. The California Environmental Quality Act provides that no further environmental review or Negative Declaration is required for subsequent projects within the scope of the previous Negative Declaration. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2003-00394 - KB HOME -The Development Review of building elevations and site plan for 168 Condominium units on 12.19 acres of land in the Medium-High Residential District (14-24 dwelling units per acre), located at the northeast corner of Milliken Avenue and Church Street within the Terra Vista Community Plan -APN: 0227-151-65, 73, 74, 75, and 227-81 1-03. Related files: General Plan Amendment DRC2003-00395, Terra Vista Community Plan Amendment DRC2003-00396, and Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16512. On July 16, 2003, the City Council adopted a Mitigated Negative Declaration for a Purchase and Sale Agreement, General Plan Amendment DRC2003-00395, Terra Vista Community Plan Amendment DRC2003-00396, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16512 and this Development Review. The California Environmental Quality Act provides that no further environmental review or Negative Declaration is required for • subsequent projects within the scope of the previous Negative Declaration. Project Density: 14 Dwelling Units Per Acre. Design Parameters: The project site is an awkwardly shaped piece of land surrounding the new Storage West mini-storage facility. Surrounding land uses include Milliken Park on the north boundary; Church Street forms the south boundary of the site; with Milliken Avenue forming the west boundary of the project. Existing land uses on the south side of Church Street includes the Rancho San Antonio Medical Center, and on the west side of Milliken Avenue are the Del Mar Apartments. The recently constructed Storage West mini-storage facility is located along Milliken Avenue in the midst of the proposed project; therefore, the existing structures establish the design theme for the proposed residential structures. The mini-storage building was constructed with a 5-foot minimum setback line at the south and east property lines (these boundaries were landscaped with the development, the north boundary was delayed due to the relocation of the Terra Vista Trail). The residential project will maintain all landscaping along the perimeter of the existing mini-storage buildings, thereby eliminating the need for fencing at the property boundary line surrounding the mini-storage. Emergency access points that were established with the approval of the mini-storage will be respected and developed by the proposed residential project. The proposed residential project will be providing a minimum of 5 feet of landscaping along the southerly boundary of existing improvements in Milliken Park, and processing a separate Lot Line Adjustment to shift the boundary of the park approximately 5 feet southerly. Open fencing will be utilized along the project boundary with the Park site. • The project is not gated, and berming is proposed along the perimeter streets to screen parking and garage exposures. Open tubular steel fencing is used along the street frontage side and rear property boundaries. DRC COMMENTS SUBTT16512 - KB HOME September 30, 2003 • Page 2 The site slopes gently from north to south at approximately atwo-percent gradient. The site is covered with non-native grasses that are routinely disturbed for weed control. There are no unique features on-site, nor any existing trees. Staff Comments: The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion. Maior Issues: The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this project: NONE Secondary Issues: Once all of the major issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues: ARCHITECTURE: The project design theme was established in order to incorporate the existing mini-storage facility, Storage West, into the streetscape of the proposed residential project. Colored elevations and photographs of the existing structures will be provided at the Committee for comparison. The following changes are recommended: Staff recommends that the building color scheme of the proposed project match (or compliment) the color scheme used on Storage West. In addition, staff suggests that other minor details be incorporated into the residential structures, such as the decorative quatrefoil. • 2. Redesign elevations and patio fencing per Noise Study. The Noise Study prepared for this project indicates that an 5 to 8-foot high sound barriers are needed at all first floor patios and a 5 to 7-foot high barriers required for all second floor balconies. The project design indicates 4-foot 8-inch high patio walls and open wrought iron railings. Staff recommends using Lexan panels where appropriate, rather than stucco walls, for sound attenuation. For balconies, Lexan could be placed behind the wrought iron railings. 3. LANDSCAPING: Staff had suggested that the applicant use a combination of walls and landscaping to screen open parking and garage entries that are exposed to view of the public street. The applicant has provided across-Section A-A illustrating the use of earthen berms and landscaping to provide the desired screening, rather them incorporate additional walls into the streetscape. This may be acceptable, provided that a minimum height is established for the earthen berm. 4. FENCING: An open tubular steel fencing is proposed at the shared property line with the Milliken Park's parking lot. For privacy, and to minimize light glare, it is recommended that this be a solid slump block wall. 5. ACCESS: As proposed, the entrances to the project do not meet City design guidelines for gated entrances. Should the condominium Homeowners' Association request gated entrances in the future; the developer may want to provide adequate landscaped areas (with required setbacks) at this time for future opportunities. The north Milliken Avenue entry will be particularly challenging to design. Policy Issues: The following items are a matter of Planning Commission policy and should be • incorporated into the project design without discussion: Vary garage door design pattern. 2. Include windows in garage doors. DRC COMMENTS SUBTT16512 - KB HOME September 30, 2003 • Page 3 Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval subject to working out these issues with staff prior to scheduling for Planning Commission for review and approval. Design Review Committee Action: Members Present: Staff Planner: Debra Meier • r 1 U DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS • 7:40 p.m. Debra Meier September 30, 2003 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2003-00638 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES -The design review of site plan and building elevations for a proposed tri- plex condominium project consisting of 186 attached dwelling units on 18.48 acres (21.38 gross acres) of land, located at the southwest corner of Day Creek Boulevard and Church Street in the Mixed-Use/Medium Residential District (8-14 dwelling units peracre) of the Victoria Arbors Village of the Victoria Community Plan -APN: 0227-201-37, 40 and portion of 41. Related Files: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16612 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16612 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES - A proposed one-lot subdivision for condominium purposes consisting of 18.48 acres (21.38 gross acres) of land, located at the southwest corner of Day Creek Boulevard and Church Street in the Mixed-Use/Medium Residential District (8-14 dwelling units per acre) of the Victoria Arbors Village of the Victoria Community Plan -APN: 0227-201-37, 40 and portion of 41. Related File: Development Review DRC2003-00638. Design Parameters: The proposed project is in the southern portion of the Victoria Arbors Village of the Victoria Planned Community. The land use designation north of the site is Mixed-Use/Single- Family Residential (Standard Pacific); south of the site is Mixed-Use/High Density Residential (Fairfield Apartments); east of the site is Mixed-Use/Medium High Residential (Lewis Companies); and west of the site is the Southern California Edison (SCE) corridor and the Day Creek Channel. The south boundary of the site interfaces with the Fairfield Apartment application for Chambray • (DRC2003-00337), with a private roadway providing shared access between the two projects. Staff Comments: The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion. Site Planning: a) Relocate one or both recreation areas to a more central location to be more convenient for residents. b) Revise the layout to eliminate isolated triplexes that do not relate well to neighbors or are surrounded by drive aisles and garage doors -examples include buildings 10, 27, 33, and 49. c) Provide a continuous pedestrian walkway around the perimeter of the entire project with connections to Church Street, Day Creek Boulevard, and the regional trail in the (SCE) corridor. d) Construct a Bus Shelter on Day Creek Boulevard outside of the public right-of-way. The shelter should be located facing Day Creek Boulevard, between 120-feet and 300-feet south of the corner cutoff of Church Street (The placement of the shelter does not effect setback of the residential buildings). e) One mailbox structure will be required in a central location in accordance with Postmaster standards; consider incorporating a mailbox portal as an integral • component of the pool building for example. The pedestrian circulation, both internally and externally, should be cohesive and deliberate; including pedestrian linkage to the regional trail within the SCE corridor and the Day Creek Boulevard walkways that allow circulation throughout the Village. DRC COMMENTS DRC2003-00638 & SUBTT16612 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES September 30, 2003 Page 2 Building Design/Architecture: a) At least 60 percent of the units shall be designed with porches (covered by roof) as required by Victoria Arbors Master Plan. In addition, a maximum of 40 percent of units are allowed to use a courtyard instead of a porch. b) Suggestions to enhance each architectural style are: French Country Style -Introduce brick, stone, or horizontal siding as a major element. French Farmhouse Style -The stonework should be extended to include the entire fireplace/chimney. c) Provide a typical elevation of the application of the noise attenuation methods (i.e. the Lexan panels) for the units that face Day Creek Boulevard. The Victoria Arbors Village and the adjacent Victoria Gardens Regional Mall are a'special place' incorporating the unique design guidelines of the Victoria Arbors Master Plan. Building product shall be designed especially for the site and the setting within the Community Plan. 3. W ails: If exterior tract boundary walls are utilized for the project they shall be Victoria Arbors theme walls (see "Exhibit 38" Victoria Arbors Master Plan); the walls along Day Creek Boulevard shall follow the Day Creek Boulevard theme wall (see "Exhibit 39"Victoria Arbors • Master Plan); and the walls along Church Street shall be Victoria theme walls (see "Exhibit 40" Victoria Arbors Master Plan), as detailed in the Landscape Plans. The noise study indicates that 6-foot sound attenuation barriers are required along street frontages, however, perimeter walls along Day Creek Boulevard and Church Street is not the desired streetscape option; therefore, staff recommends a combination of berms and Lexan panels between pilasters to provide noise attenuation. 3. Landscape Plan: a) The landscape palette shall be reflective of the French architectural theme. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that all issues identified above be satisfied to the satisfaction of the Committee, prior to recommending review and approval by the Planning Commission. Design Review Committee Action: Members Present: Staff Planner: Debra Meier • DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE MEETING ACTION AGENDA AND MINUTES TUESDAY SEPTEMBER 16, 2003 7:00 P.M. RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER RAINS ROOM 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA • Committee Members: Cristine McPhail Pam Stewart Alternates: Rich Macias Richard Fletcher CONSENT CALENDAR Nancy Fong Larry McNiel The following items are expected to be routine and non-controversial. Typically they are items such as plan revisions prepared in response to discussions at a previous meeting. 7:00 p.m (Nancy) MODIFICAITON NO 2 TOTENTATIVE TRACT SUBTT15974 -AMERICAN BEAUTY/STANDARD PACIFIC - A request to amend the previously approved Tentative Tract by adding three out-parcels consisting of 10 single-family lots within Victoria Arbors Master Plan, in the Mixed Use District of, the Victoria Community Plan, generally bounded by Base Line Road, Etiwanda Avenue, Church Street, and Day Creek Channel -APN: 0227-161-29 through 46; 0227- 171-13, 19, 21, 26 through 35, 37, 38, and 39. Related File: DRCDR01-04 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2003-00639. PROJECT REVIEW ITEMS This is the time and place for the Committee to discuss and provide direction to an applicant regarding their development application. The following items do not legally require any public testimony, although the Committee may open the meeting for public input. 7:00 p.m. (Donald/Mark) ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2003-00107 - G & L COMMERCIAL, LLC - A request to construct four office buildings totaling 32,506 square feet on 2.00 acres of land in the Industrial Park District (Subarea 6) within Haven Avenue Overlay District, located on the east side of Haven Avenue, approximately 760 feet south of Arrow Route -APN: 0209-491- 08. Related Files: Pre-Application Review DRC2003-00106 and Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16123. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM16123 - G & L COMMERCIAL, LLC - A request for a single parcel subdivision for Industrial Condominium Purposes, in the Industrial Park District (Subarea 6) within the Haven Avenue Overlay District, located on the east side of Haven Avenue, approximately 760 feet south of Arrow Route -APN: 0209-491-08. Related Files: Pre-Application Review DRC2003-00106 and Development Review DRC2003-00107. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. 7:20 p.m. (Warren//Mark) ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM16125 - G & L COMMERCIAL, L.L.C. (MONROE COURT OFFICE DRC AGENDA September 16, 2003 . Page 2 COMPLEX -SOUTH) - A request for a single parcel subdivision for industrial condominium purposes, in the Industrial Park District (Subarea 6) of the Haven Avenue Ovelay District, located at the northwest end of Monroe Court, east of Haven Avenue -APN: 0209-491-13. Related Files: Pre-Application Review DRC2003-00108, Development Review DRC2003-00110. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2003-00110 - G & L COMMERCIAL, L.L.C. (MONROE COURT OFFICE COMPLEX -SOUTH) - A request to construct a 10,056 square foot office/medical building on .89 acres of land in the Industrial Park District (Subarea 6) of the Haven Avenue Overlay District, located at the northwest end of Monroe Court, east of Haven Avenue -APN: 0209-491-13. Related Files: Pre-Application Review DRC2003-00108, Tentative Parcel Map SUPTPM16125. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2003-00109 - G & L COMMERCIAL, L.L.C. (MONROE COURT OFFICE COMPLEX -NORTH) - A request to construct a 10,056 square foot office/medical building on .96 acres of land in the Industrial Park District (Subarea 6) of the Haven Avenue Overlay District, located at the northwest end of Monroe Court, east of Haven Avenue -APN: 0209-491-12. Related Files: Pre-Application Review DRC2003-00108, Tentative Parcel Map SUPTPM16124. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM16124 - G & L COMMERCIAL, L.L.C. (MONROE COURT OFFICE • COMPLEX -NORTH) - A request for a single parcel subdivision for industrial condominium purposes, in the Industrial Park District (Subarea 6) of the Haven Avenue Overlay District, located at the northwest end of Monroe Court, east of Haven Avenue -APN: 0209-491-12. Related Files: Pre-Application Review DRC2003-00108, DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2003-00109. 8:00 p.m. (Emily/Mark) ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP TT16545 - MANNING HOMES - A residential subdivision of 10 single-family lots on 3.10 acres of land in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre) located at 6134 Archibald Avenue - APN: 1062-401-08. Related Files: Development Review DRC2003-00551, Tree Removal Permit DRC2003-00554, Minor Exception DRC2003-00779. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2003-00551-MANNING HOMES - A request to review the architectural elevations for 10single-family homes on 3.10 acres of land in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre) located at 6134 Archibald Avenue. APN: 1062-401-08. Related Files: Tentative Tract SUBTT16545, Tree Removal Permit DRC2003-00554, Minor Exception DRC2003-00779. PUBLIC COMMENTS This is the time and place for the general public to address the Committee. State law prohibits the Committee from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Committee may • receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are limited to five minutes per individual. ADJOURNMENT • DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 7:00 p.m. Nancy Fong September 16, 2003 MODIFICAITON NO 2 TOTENTATIVE TRACT SUBTT15974 -AMERICAN BEAUTY/STANDARD PACIFIC - A request to amend the previously approved Tentative Tract by adding three out-parcels consisting of 10single-family lots within Victoria Arbors Master Plan, in the Mixed Use District of the Victoria Community Plan, generally bounded by Base Line Road, Etiwanda Avenue, Church Street, and Day Creek Channel -APN: 0227-161-29 through 46; 0227-171-13, 19, 21, 26 through 35, 37, 38, and 39. Related File: DRCDR01-04 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2003-00639. Design Review Committee Action: Members Present: Staff Planner: Nancy Fong The Committee reviewed the proposed modifications and recommended approval. • • • DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 7:00 p.m. Donald Granger September 16, 2003 C~ C~ ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2003-00107 - G & L COMMERCIAL, LLC - A request to construct four office buildings totaling 32,506 square feet on 2.00 acres of land in the Industrial Park District (Subarea 6) within Haven Avenue Overlay District, located on the east side of Haven Avenue, approximately 760 feet south of Arrow Route - APN: 0209-491-08. Related Files: Pre-Application Review DRC2003-00106 and Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16123. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM16123 - G & L COMMERCIAL, LLC - A request for a single parcel subdivision for Industrial Condominium Purposes, in the Industrial Park District (Subarea 6) within the Haven Avenue Overlay District, located on the east side of Haven Avenue, approximately 760 feet south of Arrow Route - APN: 0209-491-08. Related Files: Pre-Application Review DRC2003-00106 and Development Review DRC2003-00107. Background: On March 12 and May 14, 2003, the Planning Commission conducted two workshops on the proposed four building, professional office complex. At the first workshop, the Commission directed the applicant to modify the proposed project to emphasize a pedestrian environment, with paseos and outdoor furniture. Also, the Commission was not convinced that the use of smooth plaster met the architectural goals of the Haven Overlay District. In response to the Commission's comments, a second workshop was held on May 14, 2003. At the second workshop, the applicant proposed the use of Dryvit, and revised the site to include a large courtyard with outdoor furniture. Overall, the Commission was pleased with the site layout and was comfortable with the use of Dryvit. In closing, the Commission indicated support of the materials palette and directed the applicant to proceed with the project. Design Parameters: The project site is located on the east side of Haven Avenue, between Arrow Route and Jersey Boulevard. The project site is located within the Haven Overlay District, which strives for high employment density and a high level of architectural quality. Site planning must incorporate elements of apedestrian-oriented, campus-like setting with intensified landscaping. Paseos, esplanades, and courtyards are highly encouraged. Architectural styles within the Haven Overlay must be of the highest caliber and exhibit sophisticated forms and elements. Multiple story office buildings that reflect an urban style of design are highly encouraged. The applicant is proposing to construct two identical 16,253 square foot office buildings. The buildings will be constructed of Dryvit ameristone (white ash) and stone mist (morning fog) finishes on wood framed structures, with granite (radiant red cold spring) used as an accent treatment at the base of the buildings and around the entrances. The Dryvit material is a new material not yet used on a project within the City. The project will also include placement of buildings against Haven Avenue with the parking areas in the rear away from public view. In addition, the project will include a plaza area with artwork between the two buildings, and entrances that will be accessed from the east side of the buildings. The vacant properties to the south are concurrently being proposed for development of two 10,056 square foot office/medical buildings (DRC2003-00109 and DRC2003-00110). Staff Comments: The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion. Maior Issues: The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this project. DRC AGENDA DRC2003-00107 AND SUBTPM16123- G & L COMMERCIAL, LLC • September 16, 2003 Page 2 The west (Haven Avenue) elevation lacks an architectural focal point, and the east elevation should be enhanced in order to provide recognition and draw attention to the building entrances. Staff suggests the following modifications: On the west elevation, the horizontal band of granite in the center of the building over the windows on the second floor should be extended upward, and spandrel glass should be added (Exhibit "A"). Extending the granite and adding spandrel glass will create an architectural focal point on the Haven Avenue elevation. On the east elevation, the horizontal band of granite in the center of the building over the windows on the second floor should be extended upward, and spandrel glass should be added. Granite should also extend across the entrance, replacing the proposed Dryvit stone mist (morning fog) (Exhibit "B"). 2. The placement, size, and application of granite is critical to achieving the required level of architectural quality and sophistication for projects within the Haven Overlay District. The Committee should review and provide direction on all of the following areas that Staff believes need additional enhancement: • Where granite is proposed, single granite panels/sheets should be utilized. Granite should be applied in uniform; file squares will create a commercial architecture appearance and should be avoided. • Granite should be extended to the corresponding interior wall planes and soffits in the recessed areas on all entrances on the east and west elevations of both buildings. 3. Landscape -The following revisions to the landscape concept are recommended: Match the tree species (Pine trees) and spacing of the existing project to the north along the main entry drive. Provide a minimum of 9 to 10 feet of planter space at the north and south ends of the building to accommodate proposed Brisbane Box trees which have a 25-foot wide canopy at maturity. Alternatively, Palm trees could be planted within the proposed 4-foot planter space. Incorporate Palm trees as backdrop tree (instead of Sweet Gum) along buildings for continuity of the Haven Avenue street scene. Secondary Issues: Once all of the major issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues. Provide decorative pedestrian paving at building entries. Policy Issues: The following items are a matter of Planning Commission policy and should be incorporated into the project design without discussion. The project will require review and approval of a Uniform Sign Program. • 2. Undulating berms in the Haven Avenue landscaped setback areas shall be provided to create to visual interest and to screen parkirig areas. 3. Outdoor furniture shall be provided in the outdoor employee eating area. All outdoor furniture (tables, benches, trash receptacles, bollards, etc.) shall be uniform. DRC AGENDA DRC2003-00107 AND SUBTPM16123- G & L COMMERCIAL, LLC September 16, 2003 • Page 3 Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Design Review Committee recommend approval of the project subject to the above-mentioned items being addressed. Design Review Committee Action: Members Present: Cristine McPhail, Larry McNeil, Nancy Fong Staff Planner: Donald Granger The Committee reviewed the project and stated that the proposed design and elevations of the buildings were acceptable, and did not need to be enhanced. The Committee indicated that the Landscape Plan, as proposed, was well designed, and should not be modified. The Committee recommended approval, subject to all of the policy issues, and the following conditions: Where granite is used, large sections (3 feet x 3 feet) shall be utilized. Granite shall be applied in uniform; file squares will create a commercial architecture appearance and are not permitted. 2. Granite shall extend to the corresponding interior wall planes and soffits in the recessed areas on all entrances on the east and west elevations of both buildings. • • DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 7:20 p.m. Warren Morelion September 16, 2003 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM16124 - G & L COMMERCIAL, L.L.C. (MONROE COURT OFFICE COMPLEX -NORTH) - A request for a single parcel subdivision for industrial condominium purposes, in the Industrial Park District (Subarea 6) of the Haven Avenue Overlay District, located at the northwest end of Monroe Court, east of Haven Avenue -APN: 0209-491-12. Related Files: Pre-Application Review DRC2003-00108, DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2003-00109. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2003-00109 - G & L COMMERCIAL, L.L.C. (MONROE COURT OFFICE COMPLEX- NORTH) - A requestto construct a 10,056 square foot office/medical building on .96 acres of land in the Industrial Park District (Subarea 6) of the Haven Avenue Overlay District, located at the northwest end of Monroe Court, east of Haven Avenue -APN: 0209-491-12. Related Files: Pre-Application Review DRC2003-00108, Tentative Parcel Map SUPTPM16124. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM16125 - G & L COMMERCIAL, L.L.C. (MONROE COURT OFFICE COMPLEX -SOUTH) - A request for a single parcel subdivision for industrial condominium purposes, in the Industrial Park District (Subarea 6) of the Haven Avenue Overlay District, located at the northwest end of Monroe Court, east of Haven Avenue -APN: 0209-491-13. Related Files: Pre-Application Review DRC2003-00108, Development Review DRC2003-00110. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2003-00110 - G & L • COMMERCIAL,L.L.C.(MONROE000RTOFFICECOMPLEX-SOUTH)-A request toconstructa 10,056 square foot office/medical building on .89 acres of land in the Industrial Park District (Subarea 6) of the Haven Avenue Overlay District, located at the northwest end of Monroe Court, east of Haven Avenue -APN: 0209-491-13. Related Files: Pre-Application Review DRC2003-00108, Tentative Parcel Map SUPTPM16125. Background: On March 12 and May 14, 2003, the Planning Commission conducted iwo workshops for the proposed project. At the first workshop, the Commission directed the applicant to modifythe proposed project to emphasize a pedestrian environment, with paseos and outdoor furniture. Also, the Commission was not convinced that the use of smooth plaster met the architectural goals of the Haven Overlay District. In response to the Commission's comments, a second workshop was held on May 14, 2003. At the second workshop, the applicant proposed the use of a Dryvit material, and revised the site to include a large courtyard with outdoor furniture. The Dryvit material is a new material not yet used on a project within the City. Overall, the Commission was pleased with the site layout and was comfortable with the use of the Dryvit material. In closing, the Commission indicated support of the materials palette and directed the applicant to proceed with the project Desion Parameters: The two properties combined area 1.85-acre site on the east side of Haven Avenue, between Arrow Route and Jersey Boulevard. The site is vacant and slopes southerly at approximately 2.5 percent. The site has previously been disced for weed abatement, and has one tree at the west end near Haven Avenue. The site has a 3 to 4 foot combination retaining/freestanding wall that exists between the site and the property to the north, and a 2 to 4-foot combination retaining/freestanding wall that exists between the site and the gas • station/canvash to the south. The surrounding properties include a parking lot and neighboring office building to the east, a gas station/carwash to the south, and vacant property to the north and west. The vacant property to the north is concurrently being proposed for development with two office buildings totaling 32,506 square feet (DRC2003-00107/SUBTPM16123). Access into the site is from the north end of Monroe Court. DRC AGENDA SUBTPM16124/DRC2003-00109, SUBTPM16125/DRC2003-00110 - G & L COMMERCIAL, LLC • September 16, 2003 Page 2 The applicant is proposing to construct two identical 10,056 square foot medical office buildings. The buildings will be constructed of Dryvit ameristone (white ash) and stone mist (morning fog) finishes on wood framed structures, with granite (radiant red cold spring) mainly used as an accent treatment at the base of the buildings and around the entrances. As proposed, the granite accent treatment is shown on all sides of the buildings with no logical architectural pattern. On the front (east elevations) of the buildings, the granite is provided with atwo-story arched shaped element at the entrances and on four isolated panels between some first story windows. On the Haven Avenue sides (west elevations), the granite is shown in the center of the buildings with atwo-story arched shaped element and on four isolated panels between some first story windows as well. The two furthest panels are recessed back with the building plane. On the sides of the buildings (north and south elevations), the granite is also shown with atwo-story arched shaped element and between some first and second story windows. The project will also include the placement of buildings along Haven Avenue with the parking areas at the rear away from public view. In addition, the project will include a large plaza area with an art piece between the two buildings, and entrances that will be accessed from the east side of the buildings. Staff Comments: The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion. Maior Issues: The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this project: • 1. Elevations -The placement, size, and application of granite is critical to achieving the required level of architectural quality and sophistication for projects within the Haven Overlay District. The Committee should review and provide direction on all of the following areas that Staff believes needs additional enhancement: • Where the granite material is proposed, single granite panels/sheets should be utilized. Using file squares will create a commercial architecture appearance and should be avoided. • Additional granite should be added around the base of the buildings to help identify the entries, as shown in the attached examples. • Granite should be used on soffit and recessed areas at building entries. • To create focal points on the building elevations that front Haven Avenue, the granite arched element on the west elevations should be extended up on each building and additional glass treatment added inside, as shown on the attached examples. 2. Landscape -The following revisions to the landscape concept are recommended: • Provide a minimum of 9 to 10 feet of planter space at the east side of the building to accommodate proposed trees which have up to a 25-foot wide canopy at maturity. Alternatively, Palm trees could be planted within the proposed 4 to 5 foot planter space. • Incorporate Palm trees as backdrop trees (instead of Sweet Gum) along the buildings for continuity of the Haven Avenue street scene. • Replace Crape Myrtle trees at the east side of the building to Brisbane Box trees to meet Code standards for shading parking lot. Crape Myrtle's have too small of a canopy. • Provide additional shade trees within the parking lot along the north row and at the . southeast corner. Secondary Issues: Once all of the major issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues: DRC AGENDA SUBTPM16124/DRC2003-00109, SUBTPM16125/DRC2003-001 1 0 - G & L COMMERCIAL, LLC • September 16, 2003 Page 3 Provide decorative pedestrian paving at building entries. Policy Issues: The following items are a matter of Planning Commission policy and should be incorporated into the project design without discussion: The streetfurniture design, including seating benches, trash receptacles, free-standing potted plants, bike racks, light bollards, etc., shall have a uniform design. 2. Provide free-standing trellis features/metal frame covers over the proposed precast tables and benches at the north and south ends of the site for shading purposes. 3. The project will require review and approval of a Uniform Sign Program. 4. Undulating berms in the landscaped setback areas shall be provided to create visual interest and to screen parking areas. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends the Design Review Committee recommend approval of the project subject to the above-mentioned comments. Desipn Review Committee Action: Members Present: Cristine McPhail, Larry McNeil, Nancy Fong • Staff Planner: Warren Morelion The Design Review Committee reviewed the project and recommended approval subject to the above-mentioned comments with the following revisions to the Major Issues: Elevations: The Committee approved the building architecture as proposed; however, agreed with staff recommendation that the granite material should be used on soffit and recessed areas of the buildings. The Committee agreed to allow large sections of granite (approximately 3 by 3 feet) to be used on the buildings rather than full sheets. Landscape: The Committee approved the Landscape Plan as proposed with no revisions. • DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 8:00 p.m. Emily Wimer September 16, 2003 ProiectDescriotion: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP TT16545- MANNING HOMES - A residential subdivision of 10single-family lots on 3.10 acres of land in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre) located at 6134 Archibald Avenue - APN: 1062-401-08. Related Files: Development Review DRC2003-00551, Tree Removal Permit DRC2003-00554, Minor Exception DRC2003-00779. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2003-00551-MANNING HOMES - A request to review the architectural elevations for 10single-family homes on 3.10 acres of land in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre) located at 6134 Archibald Avenue. APN:1062-401-08. Related Files: Tentative Tract SUBTT16545, Tree Removal Permit DRC2003-00554, Minor Exception DRC2003-00779. Design Parameters: The project is located at the southwest corner of Archibald Avenue and Banyan Street. The average lot size is 11,650 and a maximum lot size of 15,450 square feet. The property is located at the terminus of Jadeite Avenue and extends through toinclude a cul-de-sac. The site slopes from north to south with a total grade change of 19 feet. There is a citrus grove on-site as well as randomly scattered trees throughout. Blue Gum Eucalyptus trees front the site on Banyan Street and Archibald Avenue. The property has two structures existing on-site. The 1950's style house with a detached garage • and open shed attached to the west side of the garage. Two asphalt paved driveways exist; one to the main dwelling and another to the southern border of the site. The structures are not historic and are proposed for demolition. A lemon orchard covers the remainder of the site. The applicant is processing a Tree Removal Permit as well. In addition the lemon orchard, 13 trees located on the site consist of, Avocados, Oaks, Chinaberry, English Walnut, and Blue Gum Eucalyptus. Of these, only 8 qualify as heritage trees underthe City's Tree Preservation Ordinance. These include six Blue Gum Eucalyptus trees, two Chinaberry trees, and one Coast live oak. Out of 13 heritage trees, 10 were rated a "2" by arborist, just one level above "dead." Three of the Blue Gum were rated as "3,"the minimum rating considered suitable for preservation; however, this variety of tree is not considered a desirable species for developed areas. The arborist has reviewed the site and is recommending that all trees be removed and replaced. The project includes an application for a Minor Exception to allow wall heights of 6 to 8 feet on the south property lines abutting 2single-family residences. The retaining portion of the walls will range from 1 to 2 feet in addition to the allowable 6 feet. The applicant has contacted the owners of the adjoining properties and will continue to work with them when constructing the 6 to 8 foot high walls. The proposed elevations for the homes have been reviewed and approved by the Design Review Committee on two separate occasions as part of Tentative Tracts 16431 and 16432. A total of three elevations with three separate floor plans are proposed. All of the plans are two-story structures. Square footage ranges from 3,297 to 3,686. No outstanding architectural issues remain. Local streets typically have 60-foot rights-of-way and sidewalk is property line adjacent (7 feet from • the back of curb); however, this development would extend an existing 50-foot street: Jadeite Avenue. In order to comply with ADA, a sidewalk easement has been provided to place them in the traditional location behind the parkway planter strip. DRC AGENDA TT16545 AND DRC2003-00551 -MANNING HOMES • September 16, 2003 Page 2 Staff Comments: The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion. Maor Issues: The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this project: No major issues at this time.. The applicant has worked diligently with staff to resolve any major issues. Secondary Issues: Once all of the major issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues: 1. Most of the homes are plotted at the minimum 5/10-foot interior side yard setbacks. Eliminate slopes by using retaining walls to allow for RV storage within the north side yards of Lots 1, 2, 3, 8, 9, and 10. Note: This will require a Minor Exception for wall height. The developer could modify their existing Minor Exception request to include this. 2. Since this is one of the last remaining citrus groves in the City, it is recommended that new citrus trees be planted within the rear yards of all lots. 3. The developer shall work with the adjoining property owners to ensure a smooth transition between slopes and planter areas between the adjoining side yard property lines. All planter • areas which exceed a 2:1 slope shall have jute netting and planting for erosion control perthe Development Code. 4. Streetscape setback for all walls on Banyan Street is a minimum of 18 feet with an average of 20 feet. Increase the streetscape setback 2 to 4 feet with additional landscaping. Policy Issues: The following items are a matter of Planning Commission policy and should be incorporated into the project design without discussion: No wood fencing is allowed. Construct block walls between homes (i.e. along interior side and rear property Tine) for permanence, durability, and design consistency. Access gates to rear yards should be constructed of a material more durable than wood. Acceptable materials include, but are not limited to, wrought iron and PVC. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval. Desion Review Committee Action: Members Present: Christine McPhail, Larry McNiel, Nancy Fong Staff Planner: Emily Wimer The Committee recommended approval and directed the applicant to work with staff to ensure the RV storage is utilized efficiently on all lots. As required, the City's trees will be placed on all lots. • The Committee recommended that all trees shall be placed in a location which will receive irrigation by the developer. DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS • i SEPTEMBER 16, 2003 PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no public comments at this time. ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 8:55 p.m. • Respecttull~ submitted, Brad uller Secretary DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE MEETING TUESDAY SEPTEMBER 16, 2003 7:00 P.M. RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER RAINS ROOM 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA Committee Members: Cristine McPhail Pam Stewart Alternates: Rich Macias Richard Fletcher CONSENT CALENDAR Nancy Fong Larry McNiel The following items are expected to be routine and non-controversial. Typically they are items such as plan revisions prepared in response to discussions at a previous meeting. NO ITEMS HAVE BEEN SUBMITTED PROJECT REVIEW ITEMS This is the time and place for the Committee to discuss and provide direction to an applicant regarding their development application. The following items do not legally require any public testimony, although the Committee may open the meeting for public input. • 7:00 p.m. (Donald/Mark) ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2003-00107 - G & L COMMERCIAL, LLC - A request to construct four office buildings totaling 32,506 square feet on 2.00 acres of land in the Industrial Park District (Subarea 6) within Haven Avenue Overlay District, located on the east side of Haven Avenue, approximately 760 feet south of Arrow Route -APN: 0209-491- 08. Related Files: Pre-Application Review DRC2003-00106 and Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16123. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM16123 - G & L COMMERCIAL, LLC - A request for a single parcel subdivision for Industrial Condominium Purposes, in the Industrial Park District (Subarea 6) within the Haven Avenue Overlay District, located on the east side of Haven Avenue, approximately 760 feet south of Arrow Route -APN: 0209-491-08. Related Files: Pre-Application Review DRC2003-00106 and Development Review DRC2003-00107. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. 7:20 p.m. (Warren//Mark) ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM16125 - G & L COMMERCIAL, L.L.C. (MONROE COURT OFFICE COMPLEX -SOUTH) - A request for a single parcel subdivision for industrial condominium purposes, in the Industrial Park District (Subarea 6) of the Haven Avenue Ovelay District, located at the northwest end of Monroe Court, east of Haven Avenue -APN: 0209-491-13. Related Files: Pre-Application Review DRC2003-00108, Development Review DRC2003-00110. DRC AGENDA September 16, 2003 Page 2 • ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2003-00110 - G & L COMMERCIAL, L.L.C. (MONROE COURT OFFICE COMPLEX -SOUTH) - A request to construct a 10,056 square foot office/medical building on .89 acres of land in the Industrial Park District (Subarea 6) of the Haven Avenue Overlay District, located at the northwest end of Monroe Court, east of Haven Avenue -APN: 0209-491-13. Related Files: Pre-Application Review DRC2003-00108, Tentative Parcel Map SUPTPM16125. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2003-00109 - G & L COMMERCIAL, L.L.C. (MONROE COURT OFFICE COMPLEX -NORTH) - A request to construct a 10,056 square foot office/medical building on .96 acres of land in the Industrial Park District (Subarea 6) of the Haven Avenue Overlay District, located at the northwest end of Monroe Court, east of Haven Avenue -APN: 0209-491-12. Related Files: Pre-Application Review DRC2003-00108, Tentative Parcel Map SUPTPM16124. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM16124 - G & L COMMERCIAL, L.L.C. (MONROE COURT OFFICE COMPLEX -NORTH) - A request for a single parcel subdivision for industrial condominium purposes, in the Industrial Park District (Subarea 6) of the Haven Avenue Overlay District, located at the northwest end of Monroe Court, east of Haven Avenue -APN: 0209-491-12. Related Files: Pre-Application Review DRC2003-00108, DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2003-00109. • 8:00 p.m. (Emily/Mark) ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP TT16545 - MANNING HOMES - A residential subdivision of 10 single-family lots on 3.10 acres of land in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre) located at 6134 Archibald Avenue -APN: 1062-401-08. Related Files: Development Review DRC2003-00551, Tree Removal Permit DRC2003-00554, Minor Exception D RC2003-00779. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2003-00551-MANNING HOMES - A request to review the architectural elevations for 10single-family homes on 3.10 acres of land in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre) located at 6134 Archibald Avenue. APN: 1062-401-08. Related Files: Tentative Tract SUBTT16545, Tree Removal Permit DRC2003-00554, Minor Exception DRC2003-00779. PUBLIC COMMENTS This is the time and place for the general public to address the Committee. State law prohibits the Committee from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Committee may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are limited to five minutes per individual. ADJOURNMENT I, Melissa Andrewin, Office Specialist II for the City of Rancho Cucamonga, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on September 11, 2003, at least 72 hours prior . to the meeting per Government Code Section 54954L.~2~a~t ~1~0,5,0~0 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga. ~_~ ~! ~~ 1sd ~~ ~~ ,t pc. )f • DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 7:00 p.m. Donald Granger September 16, 2003 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2003-00107 - G & L COMMERCIAL, LLC - A request to construct four office buildings totaling 32,506 square feet on 2.00 acres of land in the Industrial Park District (Subarea 6) within Haven Avenue Overlay District, located on the east side of Haven Avenue, approximately 760 feet south of Arrow Route - APN: 0209-491-08. Related Files: Pre-Application Review DRC2003-00106 and Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16123. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM16123 - G & L COMMERCIAL, LLC - A request for a single parcel subdivision for Industrial Condominium Purposes, in the Industrial Park District (Subarea 6) within the Haven Avenue Overlay District, located on the east side of Haven Avenue, approximately 760 feet south of Arrow Route - APN: 0209-491-08. Related Files: Pre-Application Review DRC2003-00106 and Development Review DRC2003-00107. Background: On March 12 and May 14, 2003, the Planning Commission conducted two workshops on the proposed four building, professional office complex. At the first workshop, the Commission directed the applicant to modify the proposed project to emphasize a pedestrian environment, with paseos and outdoor furniture. Also, the Commission was not convinced that the use of smooth plaster met the architectural goals of the Haven Overlay District. In response to the Commission's comments, a second workshop was held on May 14, 2003. At the second workshop, the applicant • proposed the use of Dryvit, and revised the site to include a large courtyard with outdoor furniture. Overall, the Commission was pleased with the site layout and was comfortable with the use of Dryvit. In closing, the Commission indicated support of the materials palette and directed the applicant to proceed with the project. Design Parameters: The project site is located on the east side of Haven Avenue, between Arrow Route and Jersey Boulevard. The project site is located within the Haven Overlay District, which strives for high employment density and a high level of architectural quality. Site planning must incorporate elements of apedestrian-oriented, campus-like setting with intensified landscaping. Paseos, esplanades, and courtyards are highly encouraged. Architectural styles within the Haven Overlay must be of the highest caliber and exhibit sophisticated forms and elements. Multiple story office buildings that reflect an urban style of design are highly encouraged. The applicant is proposing to construct two identical 16,253 square foot office buildings. The buildings will be constructed of Dryvit ameristone (white ash) and stone mist (morning fog) finishes on wood framed structures, with granite (radiant red cold spring) used as an accenttreatment atthe base of the buildings and around the entrances. The Dryvit material is a new material not yet used on a project within the City. The project will also include placement of buildings against Haven Avenue with the parking areas in the rear away from public view. In addition, the project will include a plaza area with artwork between the two buildings, and entrances that will be accessed from the east side of the buildings. The vacant properties to the south are concurrently being proposed for development of two 10,056 square foot office/medical buildings (DRC2003-00109 and DRC2003-00110). Staff Comments: The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee • discussion. Maior Issues: The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this project. DRC AGENDA DRC2003-00107 AND SUBTPM16123- G & L COMMERCIAL, LLC • September 16, 2003 Page 2 The west (Haven Avenue) elevation lacks an architectural focal point, and the east elevation should be enhanced in order to provide recognition and draw attention to the building entrances. Staff suggests the following modifications: On the west elevation, the horizontal band of granite in the center of the building over the windows on the second floor should be extended upward, and spandrel glass should be added (Exhibit "A"). Extending the granite and adding spandrel glass will create an architectural focal point on the Haven Avenue elevation: On the east elevation, the horizontal band of granite in the center of the building over the windows on the second floor should be extended upward, and spandrel glass should be added. Granite should also extend across the entrance, replacing the proposed Dryvit stone mist (morning fog) (Exhibit "B"). 2. The placement, size, and application of granite is critical to achieving the required level of architectural quality and sophistication for projects within the Haven Overlay District. The Committee should review and provide direction on all of the following areas that Staff believes need additional enhancement: • Where granite is proposed, single granite panels/sheets should be utilized. Granite should be applied in uniform; file squares will create a commercial architecture appearance and should be avoided. • Granite should be extended to the corresponding interior wall planes and soffits in the recessed areas on all entrances on the east and west elevations of both buildings. 3. Landscape -The following revisions to the landscape concept are recommended: Match the tree species (Pine trees) and spacing of the existing project to the north along the main entry drive. Provide a minimum of 9 to 10 feet of planter space at the north and south ends of the building to accommodate proposed Brisbane Box trees which have a 25-foot wide canopy at maturity. Alternatively, Palm trees could be planted within the proposed 4-foot planter space. Incorporate Palm trees as backdrop tree (instead of Sweet Gum) along buildings for continuity of the Haven Avenue street scene. Secondary Issues: Once all of the major issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues. Provide decorative pedestrian paving at building entries. Policy Issues: The following items are a matter of Planning Commission policy and should be incorporated into the project design without discussion. 1. The project will require review and approval of a Uniform Sign Program. • 2. Undulating berms in the Haven Avenue landscaped setback areas shall be provided to create to visual interest and to screen parking areas. 3. Outdoor furniture shall be provided in the outdoor employee eating area. All outdoor furniture (tables, benches, trash receptacles, bollards, etc.) shall be uniform. DRC AGENDA DRC2003-00107 AND SUBTPM16123- G & L COMMERCIAL, LLC • September 16, 2003 Page 3 Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Design Review Committee recommend approval of the project subject to the above-mentioned items being addressed. Design Review Committee Action: Members Present: Staff Planner: Donald Granger • r: n U e i -tea Z 0 a W J W. F 4 N . ~ E O ~~ „'. ,. ~' r N ~~ `~ Z 0 a w J W . t- 4 ~ . Q o w~ O 4~ I~Y 1~" • DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 7:20 p.m. Warren Morelion September 16, 2003 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM16124 - G & L COMMERCIAL, L.L.C. (MONROE COURT OFFICE COMPLEX -NORTH) - A request for a single parcel subdivision for industrial condominium purposes, in the Industrial Park District (Subarea 6) of the Haven Avenue Overlay District, located at the northwest end of Monroe Court, east of Haven Avenue -APN: 0209-491-12. Related Files: Pre-Application Review DRC2003-00108, DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2003-00109. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2003-00109 - G & L COMMERCIAL, L.L.C. (MONROE COURT OFFICE COMPLEX -NORTH) - A request to construct a 10,056 square foot office/medical building on .96 acres of land in the Industrial' Park District (Subarea 6) of the Haven Avenue Overlay District, located at the northwest end of Monroe Court, east of Haven Avenue - APN: 0209-491-12. Related Files: Pre-Application Review DRC2003-00108, Tentative Parcel Map SUPTPM16124. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM16125 - G & L COMMERCIAL, L.L.C. (MONROE COURT OFFICE COMPLEX -SOUTH) - A request for a single parcel subdivision for industrial condominium purposes, in the Industrial Park District (Subarea 6) of the Haven Avenue Overlay District, located at the northwest end of Monroe Court, east of Haven Avenue -APN: 0209-491-13. Related Files: Pre-Application Review DRC2003-00108, Development Review DRC2003-00110. • ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2003-00110 - G & L COMMERCIAL, L.L.C. (MONROE COURT OFFICE COMPLEX -SOUTH) - A request to construct a 10,056 square foot office/medical building on .89 acres of land in the Industrial Park District (Subarea 6) of the Haven Avenue Overlay District, located at the northwest end of Monroe Court, east of Haven Avenue -APN: 0209-491-13. Related Files: Pre-Application Review DRC2003-00108, Tentative Parcel Map SUPTPM16125. Backoround: On March 12 and May 14, 2003, the Planning Commission conducted two workshops for the proposed project. At the first workshop, the Commission directed the applicant to modify the proposed project to emphasize a pedestrian environment, with paseos and outdoorfurniture. Also, the Commission was not convinced that the use of smooth plaster met the architectural goals of the Haven Overlay District. In response to the Commission's comments, a second workshop was held on May 14, 2003. At the second workshop, the applicant proposed the use of a Dryvit material, and revised the site to include a large courtyard with outdoor furniture. The Dryvit material is a new material not yet used on a project within the City. Overall, the Commission was pleased with the site layout and was comfortable with the use of the Dryvit material. In closing, the Commission indicated support of the materials palette and directed the applicant to proceed with the project Design Parameters: The two properties combined area 1.85-acre site on the east side of Haven Avenue, between Arrow Route and Jersey Boulevard. The site is vacant and slopes southerly at approximately 2.5 percent. The site has previously been disced for weed abatement, and has one tree at the west end near Haven Avenue. The site has a 3 to 4 foot combination retaining/freestanding wall that exists between the site and the property to the north, and a 2 to 4-foot combination retaining/freestanding wall that exists between the site and the gas • station/carwash to the south. The surrounding properties include a parking lot and neighboring office building to the east, a gas station/carwash to the south, and vacant property to the north and west. The vacant property to the north is concurrently being proposed for development with two office buildings totaling 32,506 square feet (DRC2003-00107/SUBTPM16123). Access into the site is from the north end of Monroe Court. DRC AGENDA SUBTPM16124/DRC2003-00109, SUBTPM16125/DRC2003-001 1 0 - G & L COMMERCIAL, LLC • September 16, 2003 Page 2 The applicant is proposing to construct two identical 10,056 square foot medical office buildings. The buildings will be constructed of Dryvit ameristone (white ash) and stone mist (morning fog) finishes on wood framed structures, with granite (radiant red cold spring) mainly used as an accent treatment at the base of the buildings and around the entrances. As proposed, the granite accent treatment is shown on all sides of the buildings with no logical architectural pattern. On the front (east elevations) of the buildings, the granite is provided with atwo-story arched shaped element at the entrances and on four isolated panels between some first story windows. On the Haven Avenue sides (west elevations), the granite is shown in the center of the buildings with atwo-story arched shaped element and on four isolated panels between some first story windows as well. The two furthest panels are recessed back with the building plane. On the sides of the buildings (north and south elevations), the granite is also shown with atwo-story arched shaped element and between some first and second story windows. The project will also include the placement of buildings along Haven Avenue with the parking areas at the rear away from public view. In addition, the project will include a large plaza area with an art piece between the two buildings, and entrances that will be accessed from the east side of the buildings. Staff Comments: The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion. Maior Issues: The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this project: • 1. Elevations -The placement, size, and application of granite is critical to achieving the required level of architectural quality and sophistication for projects within the Haven Overlay District. The Committee should review and provide direction on all of the following areas that Staff believes needs additional enhancement: • Where the granite material is proposed, single granite panels/sheets should be utilized. Using the squares will create a commercial architecture appearance and should be avoided. • Additional granite should be added around the base of the buildings to help identify the entries, as shown in the attached examples. • Granite should be used on soffit and recessed areas at building entries. • To create focal points on the building elevations that front Haven Avenue, the granite arched element on the west elevations should be extended up on each building and additional glass treatment added inside, as shown on the attached examples. 2. Landscape -The following revisions to the landscape concept are recommended: • Provide a minimum of 9 to 10 feet of planter space at the east side of the building to accommodate proposed trees which have up to a 25-foot wide canopy at maturity. Alternatively, Palm trees could be planted within the proposed 4 to 5 foot planter space. • Incorporate Palm trees as backdrop trees (instead of Sweet Gum) along the buildings for continuity of the Haven Avenue street scene. • Replace Crape Myrtle trees at the east side of the building to Brisbane Box trees to meet Code standards for shading parking lot. Crape Myrtle's have too small of a canopy. • Provide additional shade trees within the parking lot along the north row and at the • southeast corner. Secondary Issues: Once all of the major issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues: DRC AGENDA SUBTPM16124/DRC2003-00109, SUBTPM16125/DRC2003-00110 - G & L COMMERCIAL, LLC • September 16, 2003 Page 3 Provide decorative pedestrian paving at building entries. Policy Issues: The following items are a matter of Planning Commission policy and should be incorporated into the project design without discussion: The street furniture design, including seating benches, trash receptacles, free-standing potted plants, bike racks, light bollards, etc., shall have a uniform design. 2. Provide free-standing trellis features/metal frame covers over the proposed precast tables and benches at the north and south ends of the site for shading purposes. 3. The project will require review and approval of a Uniform Sign Program. 4. Undulating berms in the landscaped setback areas shall be provided to create visual interest and to screen parking areas. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends the Design Review Committee recommend approval of the project subject to the above-mentioned comments. Design Review Committee Action: Members Present: • Staff Planner: Warren Morelion C~ • • ~v >+ ;.'>a .G,.,i, ,i~ ~ `~<t=-''`:•u'A-''fir"~y° " •i} }•: ~~.. .. ~ ='.?~. \ \ r -~ INI ~ i-I I I ~ ~ ~ INI Izl L J ~ r ' U , _ , 8 u ` Lg f _ ~j~ ~ \ ~ b +. __ ~'__ s A - ~{ r. w r~ INI ~ I-I I I ~ ICI a t ~ ~ ti ~ ~ ~n w ~ ~ o~ o A r ~n 7~J 13'-0' ~ 13'-0' b'-0' 32'-0' ~ -... U ~ ~ ~- ;:~ • \ `' ` Z ~~~ ~ ~ INI ,_, ~ ~ i~ ,- ~ ~ jN~ ~ ~ ICI ~ ~ (S' CM'y N • 9 O' 9 B i f 6~_~, D ~. . ~' a • Y L r ~g~ ~~D z 1~z~yy M ~ r n e 7 O P ~1 DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 8:00 p.m. Emily Wimer September 16, 2003 ProiectDescription: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP TT16545- MANNING HOMES - A residential subdivision of 10single-family lots on 3.10 acres of land in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre) located at 6134 Archibald Avenue - APN: 1062-401-08. Related Files: Development Review DRC2003-00551, Tree Removal Permit DRC2003-00554, Minor Exception DRC2003-00779. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2003-00551-MANNING HOMES - A request to review the architectural elevations for 10single-family homes on 3.10 acres of land in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre) located at 6134 Archibald Avenue. APN: 1062-401-08. Related Files: Tentative Tract SUBTT16545, Tree Removal Permit DRC2003-00554, Minor Exception DRC2003-00779. Design Parameters: The project is located at the southwest corner of Archibald Avenue and Banyan Street. The average lot size is 11,650 and a maximum lot size of 15,450 square feet. The property is located at the terminus of Jadeite Avenue and extends through toinclude a cul-de-sac. The site slopes from north to south with a total grade change of 19 feet. There is a citrus grove on-site as well as randomly scattered trees throughout. Blue Gum Eucalyptus trees front the site on Banyan Street and Archibald Avenue. The property has two structures existing on-site. The 1950's style house with a detached garage • and open shed attached to the west side of the garage. Two asphalt paved driveways exist; one to the main dwelling and another to the southern border of the site. The structures are not historic and are proposed for demolition. A lemon orchard covers the remainder of the site. The applicant is processing a Tree Removal Permit as well. In addition the lemon orchard, 13 trees located on the site consist of, Avocados, Oaks, Chinaberry, English Walnut, and Blue Gum Eucalyptus. Of these, only 8 qualify as heritage trees underthe City's Tree Preservation Ordinance. These include six Blue Gum Eucalyptus trees, two Chinaberry trees, and one Coast live oak. Out of 13 heritage trees, 10 were rated a "2" by arborist, just one level above "dead." Three of the Blue Gum were rated as "3,"the minimum rating considered suitable for preservation; however, this variety of tree is not considered a desirable species for developed areas. The arborist has reviewed the site and is recommending that all trees be removed and replaced. The project includes an application for a Minor Exception to allow wall heights of 6 to 8 feet on the south property lines abutting 2single-family residences. The retaining portion of the walls will range from 1 to 2 feet in addition to the allowable 6 feet. The applicant has contacted the owners of the adjoining properties and will continue to work with them when constructing the 6 to 8 foot high walls. The proposed elevations for the homes have been reviewed and approved by the Design Review Committee on two separate occasions as part of Tentative Tracts 16431 and 16432. A total of three elevations with three separate floor plans are proposed. All of the plans are two-story structures. Square footage ranges from 3,297 to 3,686. No outstanding architectural issues remain. Local streets typically have 60-foot rights-of-way and sidewalk is property line adjacent (7 feet from • the back of curb); however, this development would extend an existing 50-foot street: Jadeite Avenue. In orderto comply with ADA, a sidewalk easement has been provided to place them in the traditional location behind the parkway planter strip. DRC AGENDA TT16545 AND DRC2003-00551 -MANNING HOMES September 16, 2003 Page 2 Staff Comments: The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion. Maior Issues: The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this project: No major issues at this time. The applicant has worked diligently with staff to resolve any major issues. Secondary Issues: Once all of the major issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues: Most of the homes are plotted at the minimum 5/10-foot interior side yard setbacks. Eliminate slopes by using retaining walls to allow for RV storage within the north side yards of Lots 1, 2, 3, 8, 9, and 10. Note: This will require a Minor Exception for wall height. The developer could modify their existing Minor Exception request to include this. 2. Since this is one of the last remaining citrus groves in the City, it is recommended that new citrus trees be planted within the rear yards of all lots. 3. The developer shall work with the adjoining property owners to ensure a smooth transition between slopes and planter areas between the adjoining side yard property lines. All planter • areas which exceed a 2:1 slope shall have jute netting and planting for erosion control per the Development Code. 4. Streetscape setback for all walls on Banyan Street is a minimum of 18 feet with an average of 20 feet. Increase the streetscape setback 2 to 4 feet with additional landscaping. Policy Issues: The following items are a matter of Planning Commission policy and should be incorporated into the project design without discussion: No wood fencing is allowed. Construct block walls between homes (i.e. along interior side and rear property line) for permanence, durability, and design consistency. 2. Access gates to rear yards should be constructed of a material more durable than wood. Acceptable materials include, but are not limited to, wrought iron and PVC. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval. Design Review Committee Action: Members Present: Staff Planner: Emily Wimer C~ • DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE MEETING ACTION AGENDA AND MINUTES RAINS ROOM TUESDAY SEPTEMBER 2, 2003 7:00 P.M. RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER RAINS ROOM 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA Committee Members: Cristine McPhail Pam Stewart CONSENT CALENDAR Brad Buller The following items are expected to be routine and non-controversial. Typically they are items such as plan revisions prepared in response to discussions at a previous meeting. NO ITEMS HAVE BEEN SUBMITTED PROJECT REVIEW ITEMS This is the time and place for the Committee to discuss and provide direction to an applicant regarding their development application. The following items do not legally require any public testimony, although the Committee may open the meeting for public input. 7:00 p.m (Kirt/Willie) ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2003-00146 -HIMES, PETERS, JEPSON ARCHITECTS - A request to construct a phased industrial development to include a total of 21 industrial buildings on 12.78 acres of land in the Industrial Park District (Subarea 17), located on the south side of 9th Street and east side of Baker Avenue - APN: 207-271-20, 35, 43, and 44. Related Files: SUBTPM16141, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2003-00619. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM16141 -HIMES, PETERS, JEPSON ARCHITECTS - A request to subdivide 12.78 acres of land in the Industrial Park District (Subarea 17) into 12 lots to allow for the construction of a phased industrial development to include a total of 21 industrial buildings, located on the south side of 9th Street and east side of Baker Avenue - APN: 207-271-20, 35, 43, and 44.Related Files: DRC2003-00146, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2003-00619. • 7:20 p.m. (Duane/Willie) ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16311 - BLESSENT - A request to subdivide 10.8 acres of land into 47single-family lots in the Low-Medium Residential District (4-8 dwelling units per acre), located at the southeast corner of 6th Street and Hellman Avenue - APN: 0210-062-05 and 06. Related File: Historic Point of Interest DRC2003-00818. • DRC AGENDA September 2, 2003 Page 2 7:40 p.m. (Debra/Joe) DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2003-00336 - CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES - A proposal to develop 319 apartment homes and associated recreation facilities on 12.85 acres of land in the Mixed Use High Density Residential District (24-30 dwelling units per acre) within the Victoria Arbors Master Plan, located on the west side of Day Creek Boulevard, north of Foothill Boulevard -APN: 0227-201-39 and 43. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2003-00337 - CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES - A proposal to develop 270 apartment homes and associated recreation facilities on 11.34 acres of land in the Mixed Use High Density Residential District (24-30 dwelling units per acre) within the Victoria Arbors Master Plan, located on the west side of Day Creek Boulevard, north of Foothill Boulevard -APN: 0227-201- 38, 41, and 42. • 8:20 p.m (Doug/Joe) DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2003-00605-STANDARD PACIFIC-Adesign review of detailed site plan and building elevations for 90 single-family lots of a previously approved Tentative Tract 16372 within the Victoria Arbors Master Plan in the Victoria Community Plan located southeast of Victoria Park Lane - APN: 0227-161-141- 147 and 0227-171-126-128, 130-133, 135 and 137-139. 8:50 p.m. (Doug/Joe) DESIGN REVIEW DRC2003-00661 - GREYSTONE HOMES, INC. -Adesign review of detailed site plan and building elevations for 21 single-family lots of a previously approved Tentative Tract 16373 within the Victoria Arbors Master Plan in the Victoria Community Plan located at the northeast corner of Iron Horse Place and Church Street -APN: 1089-171-35. DESIGN REVIEW DRC2003-00662 - GREYSTONE HOMES, INC. -Adesign review of detailed site plan and building elevations for 70 single-family lots of a previously approved Tentative Tract 16372 within the Victoria Arbors Master Plan Church Street -APN: 1089-171-32. PUBLIC COMMENTS This is the time and place for the general public to address the Committee. State law prohibits the Committee from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Committee may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are limited to five minutes per individual. ADJOURNMENT DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS • 7:00 p.m. Kirt Coury September 2, 2003 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2003-00146 -HIMES, PETERS, JEPSON ARCHITECTS - A request to construct a phased industrial development to include a total of 21 industrial buildings on 12.78 acres of land in the Industrial Park District (Subarea 17), located on the south side of 9th Street and east side of Baker Avenue - APN: 207-271-20, 35, 43, and 44. Related Files: SUBTPM16141, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2003-00619. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM16141 -HIMES, PETERS, JEPSON ARCHITECTS - A request to subdivide 12.78 acres of land in the Industrial Park District (Subarea 17) into 12 lots to allow for the construction of a phased industrial development to include a total of 21 industrial buildings, located on the south side of 9th Street and east side of Baker Avenue - APN: 207-271-20, 35, 43, and 44.Related Files: DRC2003-00146, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2003-00619. PLANS WILL BE AVAILABLE AT THE MEETING. Staff Comments: The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion: See attached Design Review Committee Agenda dated July 15, 2003. • Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the project subject to compliance with all Major, Secondary and Policy Issues. Attachment Design Review Committee Action: Members Present: Cristine McPhail, Pam Stewart, Brad Buller Staff Planner: Kirt Coury The Committee recommended approval of the project subject to the applicant working with staff to further design the proposed office portions as the architectural focus using more treatment such as sandblasting material or paint, to create a more formal entry statement. • DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS • 7:00 p.m. Kirt Coury July 15, 2003 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2003-00146 -HIMES, PETERS, JEPSON ARCHITECTS - A request to construct a phased industrial development to include a total of 21 industrial buildings totaling 215,455 square feet on 12.78 acres of land in the Industrial Park District (Subarea 17), located on the south side of 9th Street and east side of Baker Avenue-APN: 0207-271-20, 35, 43, and 44. Related Files: SUBTPM16141, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2003-00619. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM16141 -HIMES, PETERS, JEPSON ARCHITECTS -A request to subdivide 12.78 acres of land in the Industrial Park District (Subarea 17) into 11 lots to allow for the construction of a phased industrial development consisting of 21 industrial buildings, located on the south side of 9th Street and east side of Baker Avenue -APN: 0207-271-20, 35, 43, and 44. Related Files: DRC2003-00146, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2003-00619. Design Parameters: The site is vacant and vegetation consists of indigenous weeds. There is a row of Eucalyptus trees that transverse the southeast side of the site. The applicant has submitted a Tree Removal Permit requesting to remove the trees. North and west of the site are developed with single-family homes and a restaurant (Cask & Cleaver). South and east of the site are partially developed with industrial buildings and partially vacant land. The project involves the ultimate development of twenty-one industrial buildings, which would be used for warehouse and distribution, light manufacturing with limited office space. It will be • developed in three phases, where 4 buildings will be in Phase I, 6 buildings will be in Phase II, and the rest in Phase III. The buildings will be self sufficient with independent access, parking, and utility services. Finish materials for the building exterior will include concrete tilt-up walls, sandblast treatment and painted accent colors, horizontal reveal lines, and aluminum fixed tinted glass windows and doors. Each building will have its own outdoor eating areas for employees. Staff Comments: The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion. Maior Issues: The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this project: 1. Further attention should be given to the proposed building elevations and footprints to reflect "a high-quality, progressive, sophisticated style of development" as encouraged by the Development Code. 2. Design the office portion as the architectural focus with appearance of an office building and projecting a formal entry statement. Use more sandblasting material, spandrel glass and add more articulation to the building plane with pop-out and recessed areas. 3. Modify the Site, Landscape and Grading Plans to address the Code deficiencies regarding parking and landscape setbacks along Baker Avenue, landscape setback along 9th Street and the proposed Street "A," 5-foot wide landscape planters around the perimeter of the buildings, minimum drive aisle width of 28 feet when adjacent to loading doors. • 4. Consider re-orienting Buildings L and V to parallel Baker Avenue, which would provide screening from the residential uses. DRC COMMENTS DRC2003-00146 & SUBTPM16141 - HIMES, PETERS, JEPSON ARCHITECTS July 15, 2003 • Page 2 Secondary Issues: Once all of the major issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues: 1. Provide greater variation to the proposed rooflines through the use of vertical separations and extensions and expansions in the parapet lines on all sides of the proposed elevations. 2. Design light poles and fixtures so they are architecturally compatible with building design. The individual light poles and wall-mounted lightfixtures adjacentto residential areas should not exceed 15 feet in height. All light fixtures should have shields where the light source is pointed downward to prevent glare onto adjoining residential areas. 3. Provide perimeter wall when abutting residential uses. The screen wall should be of decorative material such as tilt-up concrete, double split-face or fluted split-face. 4. Trash enclosure area for Building K should move away from the outdoor patio area. 5. Increase aisle width at the western edge between Buildings C and H so there is sufficient maneuvering area for auto and truck traffic. 6. Provide a minimum of 6 feet wide planters at the end of parking spaces and the trash enclosure area between Buildings R or Q and G. . 7. Move the outdoor patio area for Building J at the southeastern edge of the site away from the 54-inch storm drain. Policy Issues: The following items are a matter of Planning Commission policy and should be incorporated into the project design without discussion: 1. Provide one tree per 30 linear feet of building perimeter. This will necessitate creating a minimum 5-foot wide planter along the perimeter of the building except for loading docks, and at-grade roll-up doors. 2. Within parking lots, trees shall be planted at a rate of one tree for every 3 parking stalls provided in the planters. Along property boundaries, trees shall be planted at a rate of one tree per 30 linear feet of property line. 3. All roof, wall, and ground-mounted equipment shall be screened on all sides of the development. Screening shall be incorporated into the building and site design, ratherthan have a "tacked on" appearance. 4.. Design trash enclosures per City Standards. 5. Paint roll-up doors and service doors to blend-in with main building colors. 6. Provide interior overflow drain and pipes. 7. There are no elevations proposed for Phase III development (Buildings L through V or W). • Phase III would be subjected to a new Development Review application in the future. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends the project be revised and submitted for further Committee review. DRC COMMENTS DRC2003-00146 & SUBTPM16141 - HIMES, PETERS, JEPSON ARCHITECTS July 15, 2003 • Page 3 Desion Review Committee Action: Members Present: Pam Stewart, Christine McPhail, Nancy Fong Staff Planner: Kirt Coury The Committee directed the applicant to revise the project subject to all of the major, secondary, and policy issues identified above. The applicant was instructed to work diligently with staff to resolve the identified issues and bring the item back as a regularly scheduled Design Review Committee item. • r~ L DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS • 7:20 p.m. Duane Morita September 2, 2003 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16311 - BLESSENT - A request to subdivide 10.8 acres of land into 47 single-family lots in the Low-Medium Residential District (4-8 dwelling units per acre), located at the southeast corner of 6th Street and Hellman Avenue - APN: 0210-062-05 and 06. Related File: Historic Point of Interest DRC2003-00818. Design Parameters: The proposed 47 lots range in size from 5,158 square feet to 9,214 square feet; the average lot size is 6,277 square feet. Access will be provided off of 6th Street along the northern boundary of the site and Golden Oak Road along the east. Single-family residential development is located to the immediate north and south. The proposed project will be of similar design and lot size to these residential developments. It should be noted that home have not yet been designed or submitted for City review. The Design Review Committee and Planning Commission will have an opportunity to review the building designs when submitted by the applicant in the near future. The site is predominantly vacant except for two existing residences. The vacant areas have been previously cleared and disked for weed abatement purposes. The two existing residences are located near the immediate corner of Hellman Avenue at 6th Street and have historical implications. The residence located at 9317 6 Historic Interest". The other residence, located at 9333 6th Street, is not included on either historic list. An historical assessment was prepared by Archaeological • Associates in November 2002 to evaluate the historical potential of these residences. The historical assessment concluded that the residence located at 9317 6th Street is eligible for Point of Interest designation because the Blessent family have contributed to the social history of the City and therefore, does have some historical potential. The two residential structures however, are not considered significant within the meaning of CEQA or the City's Historic Preservation Ordinance and therefore, the residences do not require preservation and can be demolished. To ensure some record of the Blessent family is kept, Staff is recommending that the applicant install a plaque that commemorates the historical significance of the Blessent family and the two residences, prior to demolition. Golden Oak Road, which forms the eastern boundary of the project site, is both privately and publicly maintained. The road, which was constructed with the Hawthornes subdivision, is public between 6th Street and an area near the Hawthornes entry gate (approximately 320 feet). The road behind the entry gate is privately maintained. The project proposes to eliminate the sidewalk along this private segment of Golden Oak Road. It is believed that a sidewalk along the western side of Golden Oak Road is unnecessary since a sidewalk exists along the other side of the road in front of Golden Oak Park. Instead of a sidewalk, the applicant will provide planter areas. The Hawthornes' Homeowners' Association has agreed to maintain the landscaping within this private segment of Golden Oak Road. Staff Comments: The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion. n U DRC COMMENTS SUBTT16311 - BLESSENT • September 2, 2003 Page 2 Maior Issues: The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this project: The project will construct a combination three-foot concrete retaining wall, topped with a 5-foot wrought iron fence along the rear yards of Lots 3 through 8. The project site directly abuts the existing Hawthornes subdivision to the south. Therefore, double walls spaced about 10 feet apart will be created between the existing Hawthornes' perimeter wall to the south and the project's proposed walls. The reason for this design is because the natural down grade of the project site requires retention and without the proposed wall location and design, the height of the existing Hawthornes' wall would need to be doubled in size to accommodate project grading. It should be noted that the 10-foot area between the double walls would be landscaped and provided with gated access for slope maintenance. Policv Issues: The following items are a matter of Planning Commission policy and should be incorporated into the project design without discussion: A minimum 5-foot planter should be provided between sidewalk and corner side yard walls. Lots 1, 18, 22, 29, and 33 do not comply. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the proposed project subject to the recommendations contained herein. Design Review Committee Action: Members Present: Cristine Mc Phail, Pam Stewart, Brad Buller Staff Planner Duane Morita The Committee recommended approval of the project subject to the following conditions: On Lots 36 and 37, step the perimeter wall back toward the south or provide vine pockets to allow for a landscaped area between the wall and back of sidewalk in front of the proposed bus bay. 2. Continue Crepe Myrtle tree planted along the east property line of Lots 11 and 12, as proposed along Lots 8, 9, and 10. 3. Proposed pilasters should be placed at the property lines rather than mid-lot. 4. W ork with staff to eliminate the mid-lot wall and slope condition along the south property line of Lot 3. If possible, continue the wall and slope condition to the west property line or terminate at the east property line of Lot 3. 5. If applicable, name a street after the family connected with the Historical Point of Interest associated with the existing residence at the project site. • DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS • 7:40 p.m. Debra Meier September 2, 2003 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2003-00336 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES - A proposal to develop 319 apartment homes and associated recreation facilities on 12.85 acres of land in the Mixed Use/High Density Residential District (24-30 dwelling units per acre) within the Victoria Arbors Master Plan, located on the west side of Day Creek Boulevard, north of Foothill Boulevard - APN: 0227-201-39 and 43. Project Density: 24.8 dwelling units per acre Design Parameters: The proposed project is within the southern portion of the Victoria Arbors Village of the Victoria Planned Community. The land use designation north of the site is Mixed Use/High Density Residential, and south of the site is Mixed Use/Regional-related Office-Commercial. The Southern California Edison transmission corridor and Day Creek Flood Control Channel form the western boundary of the site, and Day Creek Boulevard (which has been rough graded) will form the east boundary of the site. Land Use on the east side of Day Creek Boulevard encompasses the Victoria Gardens Regional Mall. The proposed project interfaces on the north boundary with another Fairfield apartment project (Regency Centers/DRC2003-00617). Access via a proposed private street is provided along the south boundary, which is shared with the proposed commercial development. Access into Meritage from the south boundary is a resident-only entrance gated, operated by a card-key. The primary entrance into the project is from Day Creek Boulevard. . This project was before the Planning Commission as a workshop on May 14, 2003 (minutes attached) to review the proposed project in conjunction with the Victoria Arbors design guideless for Multi-family development; and before the Design Review Committee on July 1, 2003 (action attached) to review progress on the architectural design and project theme. The Committee previously encouraged the applicant's to utilize wrought-iron (or decorative tubular steel) for porch and balcony railings that would vary in design across the face of the building; and that stone be used "generously" on this architectural theme. Mertiage is comprised of eight, three-story structures designed around an auto-court concept with an Italianate theme. In accordance with the Victoria Arbors Design Guidelines, the design features within the project include the variation in window treatment, balcony detailing, and the definition of individual outdoor space. Stone has been introduced on various components of the building elevation to provide variety and texture to the building theme. Staff Comments: The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion. Major Issues: The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this project: 1. Architectural Icon Trellises: The Victoria Gardens Master Plan Design Guidelines state that trellises and arbors "are architectural icons within Victoria Arbors and must be included within multi-family projects." Although trellises are included in the pool area, covered picnic areas, and a couple of other locations, none are found in the buildings themselves. Staff recommends that they be incorporated into building design. Staff would also recommend • that they be used as major design elements in the landscape at primary project entrance at Day Creek Boulevard. DRC COMMENTS DRC2003-00336 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES September 2, 2003 • Page 2 2. Elevations/Noise Attenuation: Special architectural design features will be required to attenuate traffic noise for residential units within 344 feet of centerline of Day Creek Boulevard. These features may include, but are not limited to, sound attenuation walls (rather than wrought iron fencing), lexan panels around private patios and balconies, dual glazed windows, sound baffling materials in exterior vents. Revise elevations as needed based upon recommendations of noise study (which has not been submitted yet). 3. Elevations: Provide 360-degree architecture to all sides of the buildings. Consistently, the applicant has proposed less architectural treatment to the "garage" sides of buildings despite their visual prominence throughout the project. Specific design elements that should be used include: ledger stone veneer, decorative metal railings under windows, shutters flanking windows, brackets under eave. 4. Site Plan: The building arrangement on the Site Plan does not meet minimum building separation standards in some cases. The applicant is proposing a concept of connecting the buildings with trellises to create that of an enclosed courtyard, thereby eliminating the building separation requirement, such as between Buildings 4 and 5 as shown on Sheet A-4). Staff believes that either the building must be truly connected or must meet the minimum standards as required by the Development Code. 5. Open Space: The project has been designed with 31 percent common open space; however, this is only 1 percent above the minimum standard. The project is also designed at • the maximum building coverage allowed. Staff recommends additional open space be provided. 6. Recreational Amenity package: The applicant is required to provide no less than 10 recreation amenities, the following amenities are noted on the Landscape Plan: • Clubhouse • Pool/spa • Outdoor entertainment pavilion • Group BBO facility • Putting Green • Covered picnic/BBO nodes The applicant has proposed receiving 5 credits for the provision of 5 separate covered picnic nodes contrary to the Development Code standard. Staff recommends that the applicant be given fewer credits for the covered picnic nodes and provide additional amenities within the project. In addition, Staff would like the Committee to notice that the applicant has specifically not included any amenities that would satisfy the needs of children, even in the simplest form of large open turf play areas, which are typical of our large apartment facilities. Staff recommends that specific amenities be provided that focus on children's needs, such as tot lots. Secondary Issues: Once all of the major issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues: 1. The accessory structures such as the carport and the mail kiosk should be trimmed and • detailed in accordance with the architectural theme and style of the project. For example, the carport's painted steel tube columns are inconsistent with French Countrytheme. The same carport and mail kiosk design is proposed for both the Chambray (French Country) and Meritage (Italianate) projects. DRC COMMENTS DRC2003-00336 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES September 2, 2003 • Page 3 2. Mail kiosk location unknown. Locate mail kiosk to be adjoining (on same side of drive aisle as) ample parking. The proposed location is an island that will force tenants to park and walk across drive aisle or illegally park within Fire Lane. Another alternative would be to include mailboxes as part of the Recreation Building. 3. Provide design details of perimeter fencing and walls, including the Day Creek Boulevard street frontage. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Committee provide specific direction pertaining to the items noted above, and direct the applicant to make the appropriate revisions prior to final Committee recommendation to the Planning Commission. Attachment Design Review Committee Action: Members Present: Christine McPhail, Pam Stewart, Brad Buller Staff Planner: Debra Meier The Committee offered the following comments and recommended the following modifications to the project. The Committee requested that modifications be made and returned for further Committee • review and approval. ARCHITECTURAL DETAILS: a) The stone veneer must be carried all the way the ground. Staff has observed that wherever stone is used within the existing Fairfield projects, Ironwood and Fairway Palms, that itstops approximately 6-inches above the ground and hangs in a suspended fashion; this conditions should be avoided in the future. b) The architectural details still do not exemplify the criteria established by the Victoria Arbors Master Plan and Design Guidelines. Details of window trim; balconies, railings and similar building elements are not adequately detailed or defined. The Committee encouraged the generous use of stone veneer throughout the project. c) Provide a typical elevation of the application of the noise attenuation methods (i.e. the Lexan panels) for the units that face Day Creek Boulevard. d) Detail all on-site structures (such as mail kiosks, carports, trash enclosures, shade and trellis structures, etc.) in accordance with the theme of the project. SITE PLANNING and LANDSCAPING e) The site plan appears to be very tightly designed, meeting minimum open space requirements (i.e. maximum building coverage). The concept of connecting buildings is typically not an acceptable alternative to meeting all building separation and building setback Code requirements. • f) The Landscape palette should be reflective of the Italianate theme -the Landscaping should be colorful and intimate; details can also include amenities as mosaics and fountains. DRC COMMENTS DRC2003-00336 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES • September 2, 2003 Page 4 g) The project entry statement lacks accent and the presence of a focal point. The clubhouse at the entry is a nice element, however, as you proceed onto the site there is no focal point. h) The Landscaping along Day Creek Boulevard should match the design on the east side of the street (i.e. the Regional Mall). The Victoria Arbors Village and the adjacent Victoria Gardens regional mall should be a 'special place' incorporating the unique design guidelines of the Victoria Arbors Master Plan. Building product shall be designed especially for the site and the setting within the Community Plan. j) The pedestrian circulation, both internally and externally, should be more cohesive and deliberate; including pedestrian linkage to the regional trail within the SCE corridor, the Day Creek Boulevard walkways that allow circulation throughout the Village. k) The Victoria Arbors icon -the trellis - should be incorporated along the pedestrian pathways to identify and define the prominent pathways. Unique lighting opportunities can also be incorporated to provide a unique pedestrian experience. The recreation amenities within the project shall be more reflective of the family environment, which is anticipated within the Victoria Arbors Village. • ' Commissioner Stewart agreed that the quality of composition roofing material has been bettered over • the years but she felt Mr. Trudeau's request for his house did not warrant support to change from file to composition shingle. She noted that every house on his street is file and there is a strong community (neighborhood) identity with tile. She felt that changing his roof would not be compatible • or consistent with the neighborhood. Commissioners Macias and Fletcher agreed. Both also felt it might be necessary to address the Code to clarify when and if composition shingles would be acceptable for re-roofing. Chairman McNiel explained how historically the issue of roof materials evolved within the City. He recounted his own re-roofing decision and indicated his support for maintaining the direction of requiring file roofs on all new projects. He said he would not support Mr. Trudeau's request for his house because of the consistency issue with his immediate block. Mr. Buller thanked the Commission and Mr. Trudeau for their time and stated he will work with Mr. Trudeau on how he would like to proceed based on the discussion. ..... D. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2003-00336 - CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES - A proposal to develop 210 apartment homes and associated recreation facilities on 8.76 acres of land in the Mixed Use High Density Multi-Family Residential District (24-30 dwelling units per acre) within the Victoria Arbors Master Plan, located on the west side of Day Creek Boulevard, north of Foothill Boulevard. APN: 0227-201- 39 and 43. • E. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2003-00337 - CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES - A proposal to develop 387 apartment homes and associated recreation facilities on 15.41 acres of land in the Mixed Use High Density Multi-Famiy Residential District (24-30 dwelling units per acre) within the Victoria Arbors Master Plan, located on the west side of Day Creek Boulevard, north of Foothill Boulevard - APN: 201-201- 38, 41, and 42. Brad Buller, City Planner, explained the workshop format and intent and introduced the applicant. The applicant and their representatives included Chuck Buquet of Charles Joseph Associates, Brian Hall of Architects Orange, and Dan Milch of Fairfield Residential. Mr. Milch provided an overview of the project along with some highlights of the project description for the two projects. Debra Meier, Associate Planner, described to the Commissioners that the primary purpose for the workshop was to review the first multi-family project application that will be reviewed using the Victoria Arbors Master Plan guidelines for multi-family development. She stated the Design Review Committee had previously provided strong direction regarding the expectations for multi-family development in this portion of the community, including appropriate buffering between the multi- family housing project and the commercial properties on the south and the future medium density residential on the north; and that the guidelines make it clear that multi-family development should not have buildings that line up along the street, or are oriented in a rigid grid pattern, and that the site design should reflect acampus-like setting. She noted many of these desired elements were not reflected in the project application. She said staff would like direction from the Commission regarding the interpretation of these design guidelines as related to these specific projects. • Chairman McNeil requested comments from each Commissioner. PC Adjourned Minutes -3- May 14, 2003 • • „ Commissioner Macias stated that the applicant should revisit the site design to avoid the barracks" effect created by the building pattern and arrangement; and that it was important for the applicant to develop focal points within the project, particularly near primary project entries and from Day Creek Boulevard. Commissioner Fletcher asked the applicants to describe any similarities to the existing Fairfield projects of Ironwood and Fairway Palms located in the vicinity of Milliken Avenue and 6th Street. The applicant, Mr. Mitch and his architect Mr. Hall, responded to Mr. Fletcher's questions by stating that the Chambray product is similar to the Irownwood/Fairway Palms projects, while the Meritage project is a new design that has evolved from experience in the City, as well as the provisions of the Victoria Arbors Design Guidelines. Commissioner Stewart indicated that both projects need architectural focal points that make the entries much more prominent. She believed the architecture theme does not include all the required elements as outlined in the design guidelines and this would also include the details that are incorporated into the carports. She stated the courtyards should also be detailed in keeping with the Tuscan winery theme of the Victoria Arbors. In addition, she thought the site plan also needs to be assessed for further compliance with the Master Plan design guidelines. Chairman McNeil reiterated the concern pertaining to the "soldering" effect of the buildings along Day Creek Boulevard. He also expressed concern that the site plan layout has a predominance of open parking, and that even the focus of project entries is open parking spaces. Chairman McNeil also agreed with Commissioner Stewart's comments pertaining to the architectural detailing, and suggested that additional design analysis was necessary to conform to the Design Guidelines. • Mr. Buller provided some concluding remarks, and suggested that the applicant consider using 4- or 5-story buildings in order to free up open space and said that staff would look closely at the parking needs analysis within the project. ....: F. PRE-APPLICATION REVIEW DRC2003-00427-THARALDSON DEVELOPMENT C.OMPANY- A request for the review of three separate four-story hotels buildings totaling 342 units, three office buildings totaling 15,000 square feet, a 6,000 square foot full-service day spa, a 6,000 square foot sit-down restaurant, and a 3,000 square foot general retail store on 14.75 acres of land in the Industrial Park District (Subarea 12) of the Development Code located on the north side of 4th Street between Mission Vista Drive, Pittsburgh Avenue, and Richmond Place. APN: 0229-263-48. Brad Buller, City Planner, introduced the item and explained the Pre-Application Review process. Larry Madson, Regional Project Manager, Tharaldson Development Company, introduced the project, indicating it was very preliminary in concept and that they were searching forfeedback from the Commission on how the property should be developed. He also discussed the design with respect to sensitivity to existing and surrounding area. He commented that he and his company were committed to designing an upscale hotel site project. Carol Plowman, Senior Vice President for Lee and Associates, identified potential businesses and uses that would occupy the remaining buildings along adjacent 4th Street. • Mr. Madson provided a modified site design that re-oriented the hotel buildings to reflect a horseshoe" design rather than a "soldier' layout per staff recommendations. ~ May 14, 2003 PC Adjourned Minutes DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS • 8:25 p.m. Debra Meier July 1, 2003 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENTANDbEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2003-00336-CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES - A proposal to develop 210 apartment homes and associated recreation facilities on 8.78 acres of land in the Mixed Use High Density Residential District (24-30 dwelling units per acre) within the Victoria Arbors Master Plan, located on the west side of Day Creek Boulevard, north of Foothill Boulevard - APN: 0227-201-39 and 43. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVLEOPMENTREVIEW DRC2003-00337-CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES -A proposal to develop 387 apartment homes and associated recreation facilities on 15.41 acres of land in the Mixed Use Hi Staff C~ m=nts: These two projects were presented as a Planning Commission Workshop on May 14, 2003 (minutes of that meeting attached). The applicant has been working on revisions to the projects that not only respond to issues raised in the Workshop, but also to details ident'rfied in the staff completeness letter dated April 29, 2003. The applicant has requested this meeting with the Committee to discuss only the architectural detailing of the project as it relates to previous Workshop suggestions and the Victoria Arbors Design Guidelines. The applicant will be presenting illustrations of architectural and site details for the Committee's conceptual review. The entire project application will return to the Committee at a later date. . sit deli s and make~app opriate recommendations fo~the applicant's consideration~l and other De_sian Review Committee Action: Members Present: Larry McNiel, Pam Stewart, Nancy Fong Stff Planner: Debra Meier Stff reiterated to the Committee that the purpose of this meeting was only to review the architectural and site design detils as it relates to meeting the intent of the Victoria Arbors Design Guidelines. The entire project will return to the Committee for review at a later date. The applicant reviewed the revisions to the Site Plan that have been made pursuant to comments provided at the Planning Commission Workshop, which was held on May 14, 2003, as well as comments provided by staff. Revisions include a realignment of the buildings along the street frontge, providing larger pockets of open space and utilizing the recreation buildings as project focal points, among other modifications. The Committee encouraged the applicant to explore an open fencing design along Day Creek Boulevard (to the extent that noise mitigation requirements will allow). This could include segments with no fencing or the use of wrought iron fencing between block columns. The two projects feature two distinct architectural themes. Meritage utilizes an Italianate theme and the Chambray portion features a French Country theme. The Committee provided • recommendations to the applicant for further enhancement to each theme: • DRC COMMENTS DRC2003-00336 AND DRC2003-00337 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES July 1, 2003 Page 2 Italianate -The Committee recommended that the porch and balcony railing elements are wrought iron (or tubular steel) and vary in design across the building elevation. In addition, the committee encouraged the applicant to be generous with the use of stone on this theme type. French Country -They concurred with the applicant's presentation of the French Country theme, however they recommended that the fireplaces be completely clad in stone. The Committee concurred with staff, in that the applicant has made significant and notable progress on the site layout and architectural themes utilized in the projects. The applicant will be preparing a resubmittal to staff to respond to all completeness issues and comments, and the project will return for complete review by the Committee at a future date. • • DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS • 7:40 p.m. Debra Meier September 2, 2003 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2003-00337 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES - A proposal to develop 270 apartment homes and associated recreation facilities on 11.34 acres of land in the Mixed Use/High Density Residential District (24-30 dwelling units per acre) within the Victoria Arbors Master Plan, located on the west side of Day Creek Boulevard, north of Foothill Boulevard - APN: 0227-201- 38. 41. and 42. Project Density: 23.8 dwelling units per acre Design Parameters: The proposed project is within the southern portion of the Victoria Arbors Village of the Victoria Planned Community. The land use designation north of the site is Mixed Use/Medium Density Residential, and south of the site is Mixed Use/High Density Residential. The Southern California Edison transmission corridor and Day Creek Flood Control Channel form the western boundary of the site, and Day Creek Boulevard (which has been rough graded) will form the east boundary of the site. Land Use on the east side of Day Creek Boulevard encompasses the Victoria Gardens Regional Mall. The proposed project interfaces on the south boundary with another Fairfield apartment project (Meritage/DRC2003-00336). Access via a proposed private street is provided along the north boundary, which is shared with the proposed Medium Residential development. Access into Chambray from the north boundary is aresident-only entrance gated, operated by a card-key. The primary entrance into the project is from Day Creek Boulevard. • This project was before the Planning Commission as a workshop on May 14, 2003 (minutes attached) to review the proposed project in conjunction with the Victoria Arbors design guideless for Multi-family development; and before the Design Review Committee on July 1, 2003 (action attached) to review progress on the architectural design and project theme. The Committee concurred with the applicant's presentation of the French Country theme, however they recommended that the fireplaces be completely clad in stone (which the applicant has provided). Staff Comments: The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion. Major Issues: The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this project: Architectural Icon Trellises: The Victoria Gardens Master Plan Design Guidelines state that trellises and arbors "are architectural icons within Victoria Arbors and must be included within multi-family projects." Although trellises are included in building design, staff would also recommend that they be used as major design elements in the landscape at primary project entrance at Day Creek Boulevard. 2. Elevations/Noise Attenuation: Special architectural design features will be required to attenuate traffic noise for residential units within 344 feet of centerline of Day Creek Boulevard. These features may include, but are not limited to, sound attenuation walls (rather than wrought iron fencing), lexan panels around private patios and balconies, dual glazed windows, sound baffling materials in exterior vents. Revise elevations as needed based upon recommendations of noise study (which has not been submitted yet). r 1 f.J DRC COMMENTS DRC2003-00337 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATE • September 2, 2003 Page 2 3. Open Space: The project has been designed at the minimum 30 percent common open space requirement; however, is at the maximum density and maximum building coverage allowed. Staff recommends additional open space be provided. 4. Recreational Amenity package: The applicant is required to provide no less than 10 recreation amenities. The project is deficient by 5 amenities according to the Landscape Plan. Staff recommends that specific amenities be provided that focus on children's needs, such as tot lots. The space noted as "large group BBO area," located within the lower left-hand corner of the pool deck, needs further clarification of the facilities provided within that area that are differentiated from the surrounding pool deck. Secondary Issues: Once all of the major issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues: 1. The accessory structures such as the carport and the mail kiosk should be trimmed and detailed in accordance with the architectural theme and style of the project. Forexample, the carport's painted steel tube columns are inconsistent with French Country theme. The same carport design is proposed for both the Chambray (French Country) and Meritage (Italianate) projects. 2. Relocate mail kiosk to be adjoining (on same side of drive aisle as) ample parking. The proposed location is an island that will force tenants to park and walk across drive aisle or illegally park within Fire Lane. Another alternative would be to include mailboxes as part of the recreation building. 3. Provide design details of perimeter fencing and walls, including the Day Creek Boulevard street frontage. Design should incorporate noise attenuation features as recommended by noise study. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Committee provide specific direction pertaining to the items noted above, and direct the applicant to make the appropriate revisions prior to final Committee recommendation to the Planning Commission. Design Review Committee Action: Members Present: Cristine McPhail, Pam Stewart, Brad Buller Staff Planner: Debra Meier The Committee offered the following comments and recommended the following modifications to the project. The Committee requested that modifications be made and returned for further Committee review and approval. ARCHITECTURAL DETAILS a) The stone veneer must be carried all the way the ground. Staff has observed that wherever stone is used within the existing Fairfield projects, Ironwood and Fairway Palms, that it stops approximately 6-inches above the ground and hangs in a suspended fashion; this conditions • should be avoided in the future. DRC COMMENTS DRC2003-00337 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATE • September 2, 2003 Page 3 b) The architectural details still do not exemplify the criteria established by the Victoria Arbors Master Plan and Design Guidelines. Details of window trim; balconies, railings and similar building elements are not adequately detailed or defined. The Committee encouraged the generous use of stone veneer throughout the project. c) Provide a typical elevation of the application of the noise attenuation methods (i.e. the Lexan panels) for the units that face Day Creek Boulevard. d) Detail all on-site structures (such as mail kiosks, carports, trash enclosures, shade and trellis structures, etc.) in accordance with the theme of the project. SITE PLANNING and LANDSCAPING e) The Landscape palette should be reflective of the French Country theme. f) The Landscaping along Day Creek Boulevard should match the design on the east side of the street (i.e. the Regional Mall). g) The Victoria Arbors Village and the adjacent Victoria Gardens regional mall should be a 'special place' incorporating the unique design guidelines of the Victoria Arbors Master Plan. Building product shall be designed especially for the site and the setting within the • Community Plan. h) The pedestrian circulation, both internally and externally, should be more cohesive and deliberate; including pedestrian linkage to the regional trail within the SCE corridor, the Day Creek Boulevard walkways that allow circulation throughout the Village. The Victoria Arbors icon -the trellis -should be incorporated along the pedestrian pathways to identify and define the prominent pathways. Unique lighting opportunities can also be incorporated to provide a unique pedestrian experience. Locate the mail kiosk adjacent tot the clubhouse, perhaps as an integral extension of the clubhouse building. k) The recreation amenities within the project shall be more reflective of the family environment, which is anticipated within the Victoria Arbors Village. • ~'. ' Commissioner Stewart agreed that the quality of composition roofing material has been bettered over • the years but she felt Mr. Trudeau's request for his house did not warrant support to change from tle to composition shingle. She noted ihat every house on his street is file and there is a strong community (neighborhood) identity with tile. She felt that changing his roof would not be compatible or consistent with the neighborhood. Commissioners Macias and Fletcher agreed. Both also felt it might be necessary to address the Code to clarify when and if composition shingles would be acceptable for re-roofing. Chairman McNiel explained how historically the issue of roof materials evolved within the City. He recounted his own re-roofing decision and indicated his support for maintaining the direction of requiring file roofs on all new projects. He said he would not support Mr. Trudeau's request for his house because of the consistency issue with his immediate block. Mr. Buller thanked the Commission and Mr. Trudeau for their time and stated he will work with Mr. Trudeau on how he would like to proceed based on the discussion. ..... D. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW ,DRC2003-00336 - CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES - A proposal to develop 210 apartment homes and associated recreation facilities on 8.78 acres of land in the Mixed Use High Density Multi-Famiy Residential District (24-30 dwelling units per acre) within the Victoria Arbors Master Plan, located on the west side of Day Creek Boulevard, north of Foothill Boulevard. APN: 0227-201- 39 and 43. E. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2003-00337 - CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES - A proposal to develop 387 apartment homes and associated recreation facilities on 15.41 acres of land in the Mixed Use High Density Mull-Family Residential District (24-30 dwelling units per acre) within the Victoria Arbors Master Plan, located on the west side of Day Creek Boulevard, north of Foothill Boulevard - APN: 201-201- 38, 41, and 42. Brad Buller, City Planner, explained the workshop format and intent and introduced the applicant. The applicant and their representatives included Chuck Buquet of Charles Joseph Associates, Brian Hall of Architects Orange, and Dan Milch of Fairfield Residential. Mr. Milch provided an overview of the project along with some highlights of the project descripton for the two projects. Debra Meier, Associate Planner, described to the Commissioners that the primary purpose for the workshop was to review the first multi-family project application that will be reviewed using the Victoria Arbors Master Plan guidelines for multi-family development. She stated the Design Review Committee had previously provided strong direction regarding the expectations for multi-family development in this portion of the community, including appropriate buffering between the multi- family housing project and the commercial properties on the south and the future medium density residential on the north; and that the guidelines make it clear that multi-family development should not have buildings that line up along the street, or are oriented in a rigid grid pattern, and thatthesite design should reflect acampus-like setting. She noted many of these desired elements were not reflected in the project application. She said staff would like direction from the Commission regarding the interpretation of these design guidelines as related to these specific projects. • Chairman McNeil requested comments from each Commissioner. PC Adjourned Minutes -3- May 14, 2003 Commissioner Macias stated that the applicant should revisit the site design to avoid the "barracks" • effect created by the building pattern and arrangement; and that it was important for the applicant to develop focal points within the project, particularly near primary project entries and from Day Creek Boulevard. Commissioner Fletcher asked the applicants to describe any similarities to the existing Fairfield projects of Ironwood and Fairway Palms located in the vicinity of Milliken Avenue and 6th Street. The applicant, Mr. Milch and his architect Mr. Hall, responded to Mr. Fletcher's questions by stating that the Chambray product is similar to the Irownwood/Fairway Palms projects, while the Meritage project is a new design that has evolved from experience in the City, as well as the provisions of the Victoria Arbors Design Guidelines. Commissioner Stewart indicated that both projects need architectural focal points that make the entries much more prominent. She believed the architecture theme does not include all the required elements as outlined in the design guidelines and this would also include the details that are incorporated into the carports. She stated the courtyards should also be detailed in keeping with the Tuscan winery theme of the Victoria Arbors. In addition, she thought the site plan also needs to be assessed for further compliance with the Master Plan design guidelines. Chairman McNeil reiterated the concern pertaining to the "soldering" effect ofthe buildings along Day Creek Boulevard. He also expressed concern that the site plan layout has a predominance of open parking, and that even the focus of project entries is open panting spaces. Chairman McNeil also agreed with Commissioner Stewart's comments pertaining to the architectural detailing, and suggested that additional design analysis was necessary to conform to the Design Guidelines. • Mr. Buller provided some conGuding remarks, and suggested that the applicant consider using 4-or 5-story buildings in order to free up open space and said that staff would look ctosely at the parking needs analysis within the project. ..... F. PRE-APPLICATION REVIEW DRC2003-00427-THARALDSONDEVELOPMENTC.oMPANY- A request for the review of three separate four-story hotels buildings totaling 342 units, three office buildings totaling 15,000 square feet, a 6,000 square foot full-service day spa, a 6,000 square foot sit-down restaurant, and a 3,000 square foot general retail store on 14.75 acres of land in the Industrial Park District (Subarea 12) of the Development Code located on the north side of 4th Street between Mission Vista Drive, Pittsburgh Avenue, and Richmond Place. APN: 0229-263-48. Brad Buller, City Planner, introduced the item and explained the Pre-Application Review process. Lany Madson, Regional Project Manager, Tharaldson Development Company, introduced the project, indicating it was very preliminary in concept and that they were searching forfeedback from the Commission on how the property should be developed. He also discussed the design with respect to sensitivity io existing and surounding area. He commented that he and his company were committed to designing an upscale hotel site project. Carol Plowman, Senior Vice President for Lee and Associates, identified potential businesses and uses that would occupy the remaining buildings along adjacent 4th Street. • Mr. Madson provided a modified site design that re-oriented the hotel buildings to reflect a horseshoe" design rather than a "soldier' layout per staff recommendations. ~ May 14, 2003 PC Adjourned Minutes DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS • 8:25 p.m. Debra Meier July 1, 2003 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENTANDbEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2003-00336-CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES -A proposal to develop 210 apartment homes and associated recreation facilities on 8.78 acres of land in the Mixed Use High Density Residential District (24-30 dwelling units per acre) within the Victoria Arbors Master Plan, located on the west side of Day Creek Boulevard, north of Foothill Boulevard - APN: 0227-201-39 and 43. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVLEOPMENT REVIEW DRC2003-00337 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES - A proposal to develop 387 apartment homes and associated recreation facilities on 15.41 acres of land in the Mixed Use Hi StaffStafi C~~ These two projects were presented as a Planning Commission Workshop on May 14, 2003 (minutes of that meeting attached). The applicant has been working on revisions to the projects that not only respond to issues raised in the Workshop, but also to details identified in the staff completeness letter dated Apri129, 2003. The applicant has requested this meetirig with the Committee to discuss only the architectural detailing of the project as it relates to previous Workshop suggestions and the Victoria Arbors Design Guidelines. The applicant will be presenting illustrations of architectural and site details for the Committee's conceptual review. The entire project application will return to the Committee at a later date. • site deta Is and makeiappropriate recommendations fo~thelapplicant's considerationralgnd other Design Review Committee Action: Members Present: Larry McNiei, Pam StewaR, Nancy Fong Staff Planner. Debra Meier Staff reiterated to the Committee that the purpose of this meeting was only to review the architectural and site design details as it relates to meeting the intent of the Victoria Arbors Design Guidelines. The entire project will return to the Committee for review at a later date. The applicant reviewed the revisions to the Site Plan that have been made pursuant to comments provided at the Planning Commission Workshop, which was held on May 14, 2003, as well as comments provided by staff. Revisions include a realignment of the buildings along the street frontage, providing larger pockets of open space and utilizing the recreation buildings as project focal points, among other mod'rfications. The Committee encouraged the applicant to explore an open fencing design along Day Creek Boulevard (to the extent that noise mitigation requirements will allow). This could include segments with no fencing or the use of wrought iron fencing between block columns. The two projects feature two distinct architectural themes. Meritage utilizes an Italianate theme and the Chambray portion features a French Country theme. The Committee provided • recommendations to the applicant for further enhancements to each theme: DRC COMMENTS DRC2003-00336 AND DRC2003-00337 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES July 1, 2003 Page 2 Italianate -The Committee recommended that the porch and balcony railing elements are wrought iron (or tubular steel) and vary in design across the building elevation. In addition, the committee encouraged the applicant to be generous with the use of stone on this theme type. French Country -They concurred with the applicants presentation of the French Country theme, however they recommended that the fireplaces be completely clad in stone. The Committee concurred with staff, in that the applicant has made significant and notable progress on the site layout and architectural themes utilized in the projects. The applicant will be preparing a resubmittal to staff to respond to all completeness issues and comments, and the project will return for complete review by the Committee at a future date. • • DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS • 8:20 p.m. Doug Fenn September 2, 2003 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2003-00605 -STANDARD PACIFIC - A design review of detailed site plan and building elevations for 90 single-family lots of a previously approved Tentative Tract 16372 within the Victoria Arbors Master Plan in the Victoria Community Plan located southeast of Victoria Park Lane - APN: 0227-161-141- 147 and 0227-171-126-128, 130-133, 135 and 137-139. Design Parameters: The site is subject to the regulations of the Victoria Arbors Master Plan, which requires the following three architectural styles to reflect a "Wine Country" theme: Bungalow, English Cottage, and Wine Country. The site has been graded and retaining walls constructed. The applicant is proposing a single phased development for the project. The Etiwanda Gardens Wedding Chapel and vacant land to the north and east of the site is vacant land and Etiwanda Avenue and to the south is Church Street. The proposal includes three floor plans each with three elevation treatments. The square footage of the homes varies in size from 2,142 to 2,810 square feet. The 3 architectural styles proposed include Bungalow, English Cottage, and W ine Country. The homes will also include porches, side on garages, and additional standard architectural features on elevations that back and side on Church Street. Staff Comments: The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion. • Maior Issues: The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this project: Architecture - All of the proposed elevations (Bungalow, English Cottage and W ine Country) for each plan are suitable for typical single-family development; however, are not of the level of quality envisioned by the Victoria Arbors Master Plan. The buildings do have shutters wrap around on windows and a minimal of different materials. The level of detail is typical of other tracts in the city and does not meet the intent of setting Victoria Arbors apart as "a very special place in Rancho Cucamonga. It is important that all parts of this village, including residential neighborhoods, reflect an overall design theme and project the unique identity of Victoria Arbors." Refer to Chapter 7, pages 2-5. The Wine Country style is particularly undistinguished and appears as more of a generic Ranch style. Also, on Bungalow and English Cottage plans it is recommended that stone and brick veneer be used on chimneys, respectively. 2. Roofing -Victoria Arbors Master Plan states, "steeper pitched roofs are encouraged (depending on the chosen architectural style)". The Arbors Master Plan specifically identifies a steeply pitched roof as a defining characteristic of the English Cottage style. The Plan's photo examples show pitches greater than 12:12. 3. Front Setbacks -The Development Code requires that front setback vary +/- 5 feet to give streetscape variety and interest. There are locations in where majority of homes in a row all have the minimum 10-foot setback, including, but not limited to, Spring Mountain Drive, Silver Rose Court. Does the Committee feel that the substantial articulation of the front of the three Floor Plans meets the intent? • 4. Usable Rear Yard Area -Lots 106 and 107 do not meet the minimum 15-foot flat usable rear yard unencumbered by slopes. Add retaining wall to push back slope. DRC COMMENTS DRC2003-00605 -STANDARD PACIFIC September 2, 2003 • Page 2 5. Provide street scene elevations of the rear corner elevation of residence along Victoria Park Lane and Church Street. 6. Wrap-Around Porches -Provide wrap-around porches, especially on corner lots such as Lots: 1, 7, 13, 20, 46, 66, 96, 97, 109, 112, and 118. The Victoria Arbors Master Plan states, "when possible, the porch shall wrap around the side of the building" (note: an open porch may intrude into the larger side setback). The wrap-around portion may be less than 6 inches in depth). 7. Porch Area -The Victoria Arbors Master Plan requires that the "minimum square footage for private open space in the form of balconies, porches, courtyards, trellis or combination of them shall be 7 percent of the gross floor area of the house product up to a maximum of 200 square feet." None of the Floor Plans have balconies. Floor Plan Floor Area Porch Area Required Floor Area x .07 Porch Area Provided 1 2,142 s.f. 150 s.f. 114 s.f. 2 2,638 s.f. 185 s.f. 64 s.f. 3 2,811 s.f. 197 s.f. 146 s.f. Secondary Issues: Once all of the major issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues: • 1. Most of the front ground level porches are not 8 feet deep as required by Victoria Arbors Master Plan. 2. Fifty percent of finished product should have garage doors with windows as a standard feature include in sales price of home (not optional). 3. When a retaining wall exists in the rear of the property to assist with the 15-foot usable areas, steps should be provided to allow access to maintain the slope rather than slope encroaching into usable yard as proposed on Lots 58-64. 4. Rear treatment of balconies, verandas and/or wrought iron balustrades needs to be used for all of the plans. 5. Provide decorative paving/treatment on driveways. To enhance streetscape, decorative paving/treatment should be varied throughout the tract. Policv Issues: The following items are a matter of Planning Commission policy and should be incorporated into the project design without discussion: All walls visible from or facing a street should be decorative masonry on both sides. W hen a retaining wall exists in the rear of the property to assist with the 15-foot useable areas, steps should be provided to allow access to maintain the slope. 3. All river rock stone should be a natural material (not manufactured). • 4. Access gates to the rear yards shall be constructed from a material more durable than wood gates. Acceptable materials include, but are not limited to, wrought iron and PVC. 5. On corner side yard, walls should be setback 5 feet behind sidewalk to provide landscape planter. DRC COMMENTS DRC2003-00605 -STANDARD PACIFIC • September 2, 2003 Page 3 Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the project be redesigned and return for additional review. Design Review Committee Action: Members Present: Cristine McPhail, Pam Stewart, Brad Buller Staff Planner: Doug Fenn The Committee directed the applicant to address all of the Issues, and that the applicant must work with and set up a meeting with staff to make sure that all of the Major Issues be complied with and addressed before scheduling for another Design Review Committee meeting. Commissioner Stewart informed the applicant that she was disappointed and surprised with the applicants proposed elevations, especially since the applicant has had other similar projects within the Victoria Arbors area with similar issues and had to redesign. • DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 8:50 p.m. Doug Fenn September 2, 2003 DESIGN REVIEW DRC2003-00661 - GREYSTONE HOMES, INC. - A design review of detailed site plan and building elevations for 21 single-family lots of a previously approved Tentative Tract 16373 within the Victoria Arbors Master Plan in the Victoria Community Plan located at the northeast corner of Iron Horse Place and Church Street -APN: 1089-171-35. DESIGN REVIEW DRC2003-00662 - GREYSTONE HOMES, INC. - A design review of detailed site plan and building elevations for 70single-family lots of a previously approved Tentative Tract 16372 within the Victoria Arbors Master Plan in the Victoria Community Plan located northwest of Victoria Park Lane and Church Street -APN: 1089-171-32. Design Parameters: The site is subject to the regulations of the Victoria Arbors Master Plan which requires the following three architectural styles to reflect a "Wine Country "theme: Bungalow, French, Rustic Italian, and Tuscan Wine Country. The site has been graded and retaining walls constructed. The applicant is proposing a single phased development for the project. Both project front along Church Street. The proposal includes three 2-story floor plans, each with 3 elevation treatments. The square footage of the homes varies in size from 3,095 to 3,493 square feet (include garage). The 4 architectural styles proposed include Bungalow, Rustic Italian, and Tuscan Wine Country. The homes will also include porches, side on garages, and additional standard architectural features on elevations that back- and side-on to Church Street. • The proposal does not include the 4 lots along Etiwanda Avenue. These require a separate Conditional Use Permit process and will be different homes. Staff Comments: The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion. Maior Issues: The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this project: Architecture -None. The architect has done a "splendid iob" on the all of the elevations (The architect "Woodly Architectural Group, Inc." is the same firm that redesigned US Home product DRC2003-00191 and 192). 2. Usable Rear Yard -Some lots are essentially built at the minimum setbacks, leaving small rear yards of 15 feet; however, portions are in slope. The Development Code requires a minimum 15-foot flat usable rear yard unencumbered by slopes. Examples include, but are not limited to, Tract 16372, Lots 25 and 26; Tract 16373, Lot 65. Use retaining walls to pull back toe of slope from homes. 3. Front Setbacks -Stagger setbacks to give streetscape variety and interest. The project should meet or exceed the citywide standard expressed in the Development Code to vary front setback +/- 5 feet. There are locations in Tract 16373 where majority of homes in a row all have the minimum 10-foot setback: Chimney Rock Drive and east side of Duck Creek Place. • Secondary Issues: Once all of the major issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues. Fifty percent of finished product should have garage doors with windows as a standard feature included in sales price of home (not optional). DRC COMMENTS DRC2003-00661 AND DRC2003-00662-GREYSTONE HOMES, INC. September 2, 2003 Page 2 Provide decorative paving/treatment on driveways. To enhance streetscape, decorative paving/treatment should be varied throughout the tract. • Policy Issues: The following items are a matter of Planning Commission policy and should be incorporated into the project design without discussion: 1. All walls visible from or facing a street should be decorative masonry on both sides. 2. When a retaining wall exists in the rear of the property to assist with the 15-foot useable areas, steps should be provided to allow access to maintain the slope. 3. All river rock stone should be a natural material (not manufactured). 4. Access gates to the rear yards shall be constructed from a material more durable than wood gates. Acceptable materials include, but are not limited to, wrought iron and PVC. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the project be redesigned and return for additional review. Design Review Committee Action: Members Present: Cristine McPhail, Pam Stewart, Brad Buller Staff Planner: Doug Fenn The applicant was prepared and depicted that they had addressed the usable rear yard and front setbacks issues as recommended by staff. The Committee was pleased that the applicant had already addressed the issues and expressed that they were very pleased with the elevations of the proposed house product. The Committee recommended the project for approval. • DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS • SEPTEMBER 2, 2003 PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no public comments at this time. ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 10:20 p.m. Respecttully submitted, ~.~--;- Brad Buller Secretary ~J DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE MEETING RAINS ROOM TUESDAY SEPTEMBER 2, 2003 7:00 P.M. RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER RAINS ROOM 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA Committee Members: Cristine McPhail Pam Stewart CONSENT CALENDAR Brad Buller The following items are expected to be routine and non-controversial. Typically they are items such as plan revisions prepared in response to discussions at a previous meeting. NO ITEMS HAVE BEEN SUBMITTED PROJECT REVIEW ITEMS • This is the time and place for the Committee to discuss and provide direction to an applicant regarding their development application. The following items do not legally require any public testimony, although the Committee may open the meeting for public input. 7:00 p.m (Kirt/Willie) ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2003-00146 -HIMES, PETERS, JEPSON ARCHITECTS - A request to construct a phased industrial development to include a total of 21 industrial buildings on 12.78 acres of land in the Industrial Park District (Subarea 17), located on the south side of 9th Street and east side of Baker Avenue - APN: 207-271-20, 35, 43, and 44. Related Files: SUBTPM16141, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2003-00619. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM16141 -HIMES, PETERS, JEPSON ARCHITECTS - A request to subdivide 12.78 acres of land in the Industrial Park District (Subarea 17) into 12 lots to allow for the construction of a phased industrial development to include a total of 21 industrial buildings, located on the south side of 9th Street and east side of Baker Avenue - APN: 207-271-20, 35, 43, and 44.Related Files: DRC2003-00146, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2003-00619. 7:20 p.m. (Duane/Willie) ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16311 - BLESSENT - A request to subdivide 10.8 acres of land into 47 single-family lots in the Low-Medium Residential District (4-8 dwelling units • per acre), located at the southeast corner of 6th Street and Hellman Avenue - APN: 0210-062-05 and 06. Related File: Historic Point of Interest DRC2003-00818. • DRC AGENDA September 2, 2003 Page 2 7:40 p.m. (Debra/Joe) DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2003-00336 - CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES - A proposal to develop 319 apartment homes and associated recreation facilities on 12.85 acres of land in the Mixed Use High Density Residential District (24-30 dwelling units per acre) within the Victoria Arbors Master Plan, located on the west side of Day Creek Boulevard, north of Foothill Boulevard -APN: 0227-201-39 and 43. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2003-00337 - CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES - A proposal to develop 270 apartment homes and associated recreation facilities on 11.34 acres of land in the Mixed Use High Density Residential District (24-30 dwelling units per acre) within the Victoria Arbors Master Plan, located on the west side of Day Creek Boulevard, north of Foothill Boulevard -APN: 0227-201- 38, 41, and 42. • 8:20 p.m (Doug/Joe) DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2003-00605 -STANDARD PACIFIC - A design review of detailed site plan and building elevations for 90single-family lots of a previously approved Tentative Tract 16372 within the Victoria Arbors Master Plan in the Victoria Community Plan located southeast of Victoria Park Lane - APN: 0227-161-141- 147 and 0227-171-126-128, 130-133, 135 and 137-139. 8:50 p.m. (Doug/Joe) DESIGN REVIEW DRC2003-00661 - GREYSTONE HOMES, INC. - A design review of detailed site plan and building elevations for 21 single-family lots of a previously approved Tentative Tract 16373 within the Victoria Arbors Master Plan in the Victoria Community Plan located at the northeast corner of Iron Horse Place and Church Street -APN: 1089-171-35. DESIGN REVIEW DRC2003-00662 - GREYSTONE HOMES, INC. - A design review of detailed site plan and building elevations for 70 single-family lots of a previously approved Tentative Tract 16372 within the Victoria Arbors Master Plan Church Street -APN: 1089-171-32. PUBLIC COMMENTS This is the time and place for the general public to address the Committee. State law prohibits the Committee from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Committee may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are limited to five minutes per individual. ADJOURNMENT 1, Mary Lou Gragg, Office Specialist 11 for the City of Rancho Cucamonga, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on August 28, 2003 at least 72 hours prior to the meeting per Government Code Section 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Ce~e, ancho Cucamonga. ~ _ ~'T~ DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS • 7:00 p.m. Kirt Coury September 2, 2003 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2003-00146 -HIMES, PETERS, JEPSON ARCHITECTS - A request to construct a phased industrial development to include a total of 21 industrial buildings on 12.78 acres of land in the Industrial Park District (Subarea 17), located on the south side of 9th Street and east side of Baker Avenue - APN: 207-271-20, 35, 43, and 44. Related Files: SUBTPM16141, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2003-00619. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM16141 -HIMES, PETERS, JEPSON ARCHITECTS - A request to subdivide 12.78 acres of land in the Industrial Park District (Subarea 17) into 12 lots to allow for the construction of a phased industrial development to include a total of 2lindustrial buildings, located on the south side of 9th Street and east side of Baker Avenue - APN: 207-271-20, 35, 43, and 44.Related Files: DRC2003-00146, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2003-00619. PLANS WILL BE AVAILABLE AT THE MEETING. Staff Comments: The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion: See attached Design Review Committee Agenda dated July 15, 2003. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the project subject to compliance with all Major, Secondary and Policy Issues. Attachment Design Review Committee Action: Members Present: Staff Planner: Kirt Coury • DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS • 7:00 p.m. Kirt Coury July 15, 2003 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2003-00146 -HIMES, PETERS, JEPSON ARCHITECTS - A request to construct a phased industrial development to include a total of 21 industrial buildings totaling 215,455 square feet on 12.78 acres of land in the Industrial Park District (Subarea 17), located on the south side of 9th Street and east side of Baker Avenue-APN: 0207-271-20, 35, 43, and 44. Related Files: SUBTPM16141, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2003-00619. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM16141 -HIMES, PETERS, JEPSON ARCHITECTS -A request to subdivide 12.78 acres of land in the Industrial Park District (Subarea 17) into 11 lots to allow for the construction of a phased industrial development consisting of 21 industrial buildings, located on the south side of 9th Street and east side of Baker Avenue -APN: 0207-271-20, 35, 43, and 44. Related Files: DRC2003-00146, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2003-00619. Design Parameters: The site is vacant and vegetation consists of indigenous weeds. There is a row of Eucalyptus trees that transverse the southeast side of the site. The applicant has submitted a Tree Removal Permit requesting to remove the trees. North and west of the site are developed with single-family homes and a restaurant (Cask & Cleaver). South and east of the site are partially developed with industrial buildings and partially vacant land. The project involves the ultimate development of twenty-one industrial buildings, which would be used for warehouse and distribution, light manufacturing with limited office space. It will be . developed in three phases, where 4 buildings will be in Phase I, 6 buildings will be in Phase II, and the rest in Phase III. The buildings will be self sufficient with independent access, parking, and utility services. -Finish materials for the building exterior will include concrete tilt-up walls, sandblast treatment and painted accent colors, horizontal reveal lines, and aluminum fixed tinted glass windows and doors. Each building will have its own outdoor eating areas for employees. Staff Comments: The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion. Maior Issues: The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this project: Further attention should be given to the proposed building elevations and footprints to reflect "a high-quality, progressive, sophisticated style of development" as encouraged by the Development Code. 2. Design the office portion as the architectural focus with appearance of an office building and projecting a formal entry statement. Use more sandblasting material, spandrel glass and add more articulation to the building plane with pop-out and recessed areas. 3. Modify the Site, Landscape and Grading Plans to address the Code deficiencies regarding parking and landscape setbacks along Baker Avenue, landscape setback along 9th Street and the proposed Street "A," 5-foot wide landscape planters around the perimeter of the buildings, minimum drive aisle width of 28 feet when adjacent to loading doors. 4. Consider re-orienting Buildings L and V to parallel Baker Avenue, which would provide • screening from the residential uses. DRC COMMENTS DRC2003-00146 & SUBTPM16141 - HIMES, PETERS, JEPSON ARCHITECTS July 15, 2003 . Page 2 SecondaN Issues: Once all of the major issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues: 1. Provide greater variation to the proposed rooflines through the use of vertical separations and extensions and expansions.in the parapet lines on all sides of the proposed elevations. 2. Design light poles and fixtures so they are architecturally compatible with building design. The individual light poles and wall-mounted light fixtures adjacent to residential areas should not exceed 15 feet in height. All light fixtures should have shields where the light source is pointed downward to prevent glare onto adjoining residential areas. 3. Provide perimeter wall when abutting residential uses. The screen wall should be of decorative material such as tilt-up concrete, double split-face or fluted split-face. 4. Trash enclosure area for Building K should move away from the outdoor patio area. 5. Increase aisle width at the western edge between Buildings C and H so there is sufficient maneuvering area for auto and truck traffic. 6. Provide a minimum of 6 feet wide planters at the end of parking spaces and the trash enclosure area between Buildings R or O and G. • 7. Move the outdoor patio area for Building J at the southeastern edge of the site away from the 54-inch storm drain. Policv Issues: The following items are a matter of Planning Commission policy and should be incorporated into the project design without discussion: 1. Provide one tree per 30 linear feet of building perimeter. This will necessitate creating a minimum 5-foot wide planter along the perimeter of the building except for loading docks, and at-grade roll-up doors. 2. Within parking lots, trees shall be planted at a rate of one tree for every 3 parking stalls provided in the planters. Along property boundaries, trees shall be planted at a rate of one tree per 30 linear feet of property line. 3. All roof, wall, and ground-mounted equipment shall be screened on all sides of the development. Screening shall be incorporated into the building and site design, ratherthan have a "tacked on" appearance. 4. Design trash enclosures per City Standards. 5. Paint roll-up doors and service doors to blend-in with main building colors. 6. Provide interior overFlow drain and pipes. 7. There are no elevations proposed for Phase III development (Buildings L through V or W ). Phase III would be subjected to a new Development Review application in the future. • Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends the project be revised and submitted for further Committee review. DRC COMMENTS DRC2003-00146 & SUBTPM16141 - HIMES, PETERS, JEPSON ARCHITECTS July 15, 2003 • Page 3 Design Review Committee Action: Members Present: Pam Stewart, Christine McPhail, Nancy Fong Staff Planner: Kirt Coury The Committee directed the applicant to revise the project subject to all of the major, secondary, and policy issues identified above. The applicant was instructed to work diligently with staff to resolve the identified issues and bring the item back as a regularly scheduled Design Review Committee item. C~ r1 U DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS • 7:20 p.m. Duane Morita September 2, 2003 ENVI RONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16311 - BLESSENT - A request to subdivide 10.8 acres of land into 47 single-family lots in the Low-Medium Residential District (4-8 dwelling units per acre), located at the southeast corner of 6th Street and Hellman Avenue - APN: 0210-062-05 and 06. Related File: Historic Point of Interest DRC2003-00818. Design Parameters: The proposed 47 lots range in size from 5,158 square feet to 9,214 square feet; the average lot size is 6,277 square feet. Access will be provided off of 6th Street along the northern boundary of the site and Golden Oak Road along the east. Single-family residential development is located to the immediate north and south. The proposed project will be of similar design and lot size to these residential developments. It should be noted that home have not yet been designed or submitted for City review. The Design Review Committee and Planning Commission will have an opportunityto reviewthe building designs when submitted by the applicant in the near future. The site is predominantly vacant except for two existing residences. The vacant areas have been previously cleared and disked for weed abatement purposes. The two existing residences are located near the immediate corner of Hellman Avenue at 6th Street and have historical implications. The residence located at 9317 6 Historic Interest". The other residence, located at 9333 6th Street, is not included on either historic list. An historical assessment was prepared by Archaeological • Associates in November 2002 to evaluate the historical potential of these residences. The historical assessment concluded that the residence located at 9317 6th Street is eligible for Point of Interest designation because the Blessent family have contributed to the social history of the City and therefore, does have some historical potential. The two residential structures however, are not considered significant within the meaning of CEQA or the City's Historic Preservation Ordinance and therefore, the residences do not require preservation and can be demolished. To ensure some, record of the Blessent family is kept, Staff is recommending that the applicant install a plaque that commemorates the historical significance of the Blessent family and the two residences, prior to demolition. Golden Oak Road, which forms the eastern boundary of the project site, is both privately and publicly maintained. The road, which was constructed with the Hawthornes subdivision, is public between 6th Street and an area near the Hawthornes entry gate (approximately 320 feet). The road behind the entry gate is privately maintained. The project proposes to eliminate the sidewalk along this private segment of Golden Oak Road. It is believed that a sidewalk along the western side of Golden Oak Road is unnecessary since a sidewalk exists along the other side of the road in front of Golden Oak Park. Instead of a sidewalk, the applicant will provide planter areas. The Hawthornes' Homeowners' Association has agreed to maintain the landscaping within this private segment of Golden Oak Road. Staff Comments: The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion. • DRC COMMENTS SUBTT16311 - BLESSENT • September 2, 2003 Page 2 Maior Issues: The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this project: The project will construct a combination three-foot concrete retaining wall, topped with a 5-foot wrought iron fence along the rear yards of Lots 3 through 8. The project site directly abuts the existing Hawthornes subdivision to the south. Therefore, double walls spaced about 10 feet apart will be created between the existing Hawthornes' perimeter wall to the south and the project's proposed walls. The reason for this design is because the natural down grade of the project site requires retention and without the proposed wall location and design, the height of the existing Hawthornes' wall would need to be doubled in size to accommodate project grading. It should be noted that the 10-foot area between the double walls would be landscaped and provided with gated access for slope maintenance. Policy Issues: The following items are a matter of Planning Commission policy and should be incorporated into the project design without discussion: A minimum 5-foot planter should be provided between sidewalk and corner side yard walls. Lots 1, 18, 22, 29, and 33 do not comply. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the proposed project subject to the recommendations contained herein. • Design Review Committee Action: Members Present: Staff Planner Duane Morita r~ U DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS • 7:40 p.m. Debra Meier September 2, 2003 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2003-00336 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES - A proposal to develop 319 apartment homes and associated recreation facilities on 12.85 acres of land in the Mixed Use/High Density Residential District (24-30 dwelling units per acre) within the Victoria Arbors Master Plan, located on the west side of Day Creek Boulevard, north of Foothill Boulevard - APN: 0227-201-39 and 43. Project Density: 24.8 dwelling units per acre Design Parameters: The proposed project is within the southern portion of the Victoria Arbors Village of the Victoria Planned Community. The land use designation north of the site is Mixed Use/High Density Residential, and south of the site is Mixed Use/Regional-related Office-Commercial. The Southern California Edison transmission corridor and Day Creek Flood Control Channel form the western boundary of the site, and Day Creek Boulevard (which has been rough graded) will form the east boundary of the site. Land Use on the east side of Day Creek Boulevard encompasses the Victoria Gardens Regional Mall. The proposed project interfaces on the north boundary with another Fairfield apartment project (Regency Centers/DRC2003-00617). Access via a proposed private street is provided along the south boundary, which is shared with the proposed commercial development. Access into Meritage from the south boundary is a resident-only entrance gated, operated by a card-key. The primary entrance into the project is from Day Creek Boulevard. • This project was before the Planning Commission as a workshop on May 14, 2003 (minutes attached) to review the proposed project in conjunction with the Victoria Arbors design guideless for Multi-family development; and before the Design Review Committee on July 1, 2003 (action attached) to review progress on the architectural design and project theme: The Committee previously encouraged the applicant's to utilize wrought-iron (or decorative tubular steel) for porch and balcony railings that would vary in design across the face of the building; and that stone be used "generously" on this architectural theme. Mertiage is comprised of eight, three-story structures designed around an auto-court concept with an Italianate theme. In accordance with the Victoria Arbors Design Guidelines, the design features within the project include the variation in window treatment, balcony detailing, and the definition of individual outdoor space. Stone has been introduced on various components of the building elevation to provide variety and texture to the building theme. Staff Comments: The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion. Major Issues: The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this project: 1. Architectural Icon Trellises: The Victoria Gardens Master Plan Design Guidelines state that trellises and arbors "are architectural icons within Victoria Arbors and must be included within multi-family projects." Although trellises are included in the pool area, covered picnic areas, and a couple of other locations, none are found in the buildings themselves. Staff recommends that they be incorporated into building design. Staff would also recommend • that they be used as major design elements in the landscape at primary project entrance at Day Creek Boulevard. DRC COMMENTS DRC2003-00336 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES September 2, 2003 • Page 2 Elevations/Noise Attenuation: Special architectural design features will be required to attenuate traffic noise for residential units within 344 feet of centerline of Day Creek Boulevard. These features may include, but are not limited to, sound attenuation walls (rather than wrought iron fencing), lexan panels around private patios and balconies, dual glazed windows, sound baffling materials in exterior vents. Revise elevations as needed based upon recommendations of noise study (which has not been submitted yet). 3. Elevations: Provide 360-degree architecture to all sides of the buildings. Consistently, the applicant has proposed less architectural treatment to the "garage" sides of buildings despite their visual prominence throughout the project. Specific design elements that should be used include: ledger stone veneer, decorative metal railings under windows, shutters flanking windows, brackets under eave. 4. Site Plan: The building arrangement on the Site Plan does not meet minimum building separation standards in some cases. The applicant is proposing a concept of connecting the buildings with trellises to create that of an enclosed courtyard, thereby eliminating the building separation requirement, such as between Buildings 4 and 5 as shown on Sheet A-4). Staff believes that either the building must be truly connected or must meet the minimum standards as required by the Development Code. 5. Open Space: The project has been designed with 31 percent common open space; however, this is only 1 percent above the minimum standard. The project is also designed at • the maximum building coverage allowed. Staff recommends additional open space be provided. 6. Recreational Amenity package: The applicant is required to provide no less than 10 recreation amenities, the following amenities are noted on the Landscape Plan: • Clubhouse 1 • Pool/spa 1 • Outdoor entertainment pavilion 1 • Group BBO facility 1 • Putting Green 1 • Covered picnic/BBO nodes 5 The applicant has proposed receiving 5 credits for the provision of 5 separate covered picnic nodes contrary to the Development Code standard. Staff recommends that the applicant be given fewer credits for the covered picnic nodes and provide additional amenities within the project. In addition, Staff would like the Committee to notice that the applicant has specifically not included any amenities that would satisfy the needs of children, even in the simplest form of large open turf play areas, which are typical of our large apartment facilities. Staff recommends that specific amenities be provided that focus on children's needs, such as tot lots. Secondary Issues: Once all of the major issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues: 1. The accessory structures such as the carport and the mail kiosk should be trimmed and • detailed in accordance with the architectural theme and style of the project. For example, the carport's painted steel tube columns are inconsistent with French Countrytheme. The same carport and mail kiosk design is proposed for both the Chambray (French Country) and Meritage (Italianate) projects. DRC COMMENTS DRC2003-00336 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES September 2, 2003 • Page 3 Mail kiosk location unknown. Locate mail kiosk to be adjoining (on same side of drive aisle as) ample parking. The proposed location is an island that will force tenants to park and walk across drive aisle or illegally park within Fire Lane. Another alternative would be to include mailboxes as part of the Recreation Building. 3. Provide design details of perimeter fencing and walls, including the Day Creek Boulevard street frontage. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Committee provide specific direction pertaining to the items noted above, and direct the applicant to make the appropriate revisions prior to final Committee recommendation to the Planning Commission. Attachment Design Review Committee Action: Members Present: Staff Planner: Debra Meier • u ' Commissioner Stewart agreed that the quality of composition roofing material has been bettered over the years but she felt Mr. Trudeau's request for his house did not warrant support to change from file to composition shingle. She noted that every house on his street is file and there is a strong community (neighborhood) identity with tile. She felt that changing his roof would not be compatible or consistent with the neighborhood. Commissioners Macias and Fletcher agreed. Both also felt it might be necessary to address the Code to clarify when and if composition shingles would be acceptable for re-roofing. Chairman McNiel explained how historically the issue of roof materials evolved within the City. He recounted his own re-roofing decision and indicated his support for maintaining the direction of requiring file roofs on all new projects. He said he would not support Mr. Trudeau's request for his house because of the consistency issue with his immediate block. Mr. Buller thanked the Commission and Mr. Trudeau for their time and stated he will work with Mr. Trudeau on how he would like to proceed based on the discussion. ..... D. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2003-00336 - CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES - A proposal to develop 210 apartment homes and associated recreation facilities on 8.78 acres of land in the Mixed Use High Density Multi-Famiy Residential District (24-30 dwelling units per acre) within the Victoria Arbors Master Plan, located on the west side of Day Creek Boulevard, north of Foothill Boulevard. APN: 0227-201- 39 and 43. E. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2003-00337 - CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES - A proposal to develop 387 apartment homes and associated recreation facilities on 15.41 acres of land in the Mixed Use High Density Multi-Family Residential District (24-30 dwelling units per acre) within the V'idoria Arbors Master Plan, located on the west side of Day Creek Boulevard, north of Foothill Boulevard - APN: 201-201- 38, 41, and 42. Brad Buller, City Planner, explained the workshop format and intent and introduced the applicant. The applicant and their representatives included Chuck Buquet of Charles Joseph Associates, Brian Hall of Architects Orange, and Dan Mitch of Fairfield Residential. Mr. Mitch provided an overview of the project along with some highlights of the project description for the two projects. Debra Meier, Associate Planner, described to the Commissioners that the primary purpose for the workshop was to review the first multi-family project application that will be reviewed using the Victoria Arbors Master Plan guidelines for multi-family development. She stated the Design Review Committee had previously provided strong direction regarding the expectations for multi-family development in this portion of the community, including appropriate buffering between the multi- family housing project and the commercial properties on the south and the future medium density residential on the north; and that the guidelines make it clear that multi-family development should not have buildings that line up along the street, or are oriented in a rigid grid pattern, and that the site design should reflect acampus-like setting. She noted many of these desired elements were not reflected in the project application. She said staff would like direction from the Commission regarding the interpretation of these design guidelines as related to these specific projects. • Chairman McNeil requested comments from each Commissioner. PC Adjourned Minutes -3- May 14, 2003 Commissioner Macias stated that the applicant should revisit the site design to avoid the "barracks" • effect created by the building pattern and arrangement; and that it was important for the applicant to develop focal points within the project, particularly near primary project entries and from Day Creek Boulevard. Commissioner Fletcher asked the applicants to describe any similarities to the existing Faifield projects of Ironwood and Fairway Palms located in the vicinity of Milliken Avenue and 6th Street. The applicant, Mr. Milch and his architect Mr. Hall, responded to Mr. Fletcher's questions by stating that the Chambray product is similar to the Irownwood/Fairway Palms projects, while the Meritage project is a new design that has evolved from experience in the City, as well as the provisions of the Victoria Arbors Design Guidelines. Commissioner Stewart indicated that both projects need architectural focal points that make the entries much more prominent. She believed the architecture theme does not include all the required elements as outlined in the design guidelines and this would also include the details that are incorporated into the carports. She stated the courtyards should also be detailed in keeping with the Tuscan winery theme of the Victoria Arbors. In addition, she thought the site plan also needs to be assessed for further compliance with the Master Plan design guidelines. Chairman McNeil reiterated the concern pertaining to the "soldering" effect of the buildings along Day Creek Boulevard. He also expressed concern that the site plan layout has a predominance of open parking, and that even the focus of project entries is open parking spaces. Chairman McNeil also agreed with Commissioner Stewart's comments pertaining to the architectural detailing, and suggested that additional design analysis was necessary to conform to the Design Guidelines. Mr. Buller provided some concluding remarks, and suggested that the applicant consider using 4- or 5-story buildings in order to free up open space and said that staff would look closely at the parking needs analysis within the project. ..... F. PRE-APPLICATION REVIEW DRC2003-00427-THARALDSONDEVELOPMENTCOMPANY- A request for the review of three separate four-story hotels buildings totaling 342 units, three office buildings totaling 15,000 square feet, a 6,000 square foot full-service day spa, a 6,000 square foot sit-down restaurant, and a 3,000 square foot general retail store on 14.75 acres of land in the Industrial Park District (Subarea 12) of the Development Code located on the north side of 4th Street between Mission Vista Drive, Pittsburgh Avenue, and Richmond Place. APN: 0229-263-48. Brad Buller, City Planner, introduced the item and explained the Pre-Application Review process. Larry Madson, Regional Project Manager, Tharaldson Development Company, introduced the project, indicating it was very preliminary in concept and that they were searching for feedback from the Commission on how the property should be developed. He also discussed the design with respect to sensitivity to existing and surrounding area. He commented that he and his tympany were committed to designing an upscale hotel site project. Carol Plowman, Senior Vice President for Lee and Associates, identified potential businesses and uses that would occupy the remaining buildings along adjacent 4th Street. Mr. Madson provided a modified site design that re-oriented the hotel buildings to reflect a . "horseshoe" design rather than a "soldier" layout per staff recommendations. PC Adjourned Minutes ~ -4- May 14, 2003 ., DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS • 8:25 p.m. Debra Meier July 1, 2003 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENTANDbEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2003-00336-CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES - A proposal to develop 210 apartment homes and associated recreation facilities on 8.78 acres of land in the Mixed Use High Density Residential District (24-30 dwelling units per acre) within the Victoria Arbors Master Plan, located on the west side of Day Creek Boulevard, north of Foothill Boulevard - APN: 0227-201-39 and 43. ENVIRONMENTALASSESSMENTANDDEVLEOPMENTREVIEW DRC2003-00337-CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES - A proposal to develop 387 apartment homes and associated recreation facilities on 15.41 acres of land in the Mixed Use Hi Staff Comments: These two projects were presented as a Planning Commission Workshop on May 14, 2003 (minutes of that meeting attached). The applicant has been working on revisions to the projects that not only respond to issues raised in the Workshop, but also to details identified in the staff completeness letter dated April 29, 2003. ' The applicant has requested this meetirig with the Committee to discuss only the architectural detailing of the project as it relates to previous Workshop suggestions and the Victoria Arbors Design Guidelines. The applicant will be presenting illustrations of architectural and site details for the Committee's conceptual review. The entire project application will return to the Cbmrriittee at a later date. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Committee review the architectural and other site details and make appropriate recommendations for the applicant's consideration. Design Review Committee Action: Members Present: Larry McNiel, Pam Stewart, Nancy Fong Staff Planner: Debra Meier Staff reiterated to the Committee that the purpose of this meeting was only to review the architectural and site design details as it relates to meeting the intent of the Victoria Arbors Design Guidelines. The entire project will return to the Committee for review at a later date. The applicant reviewed the revisions to the Site Plan that have been made pursuant to comments provided at the Planning Commission Workshop, which was held on May 14, 2003, as well as comments provided by staff. Revisions include a realignment of the buildings along the street frontage, providing larger pockets of open space and utilizing the recreation buildings as project focal points, among other modifications. The Committee encouraged the applicant to explore an open fencing design along Day Creek Boulevard (to the extent that noise mitigation requirements will allow). This could include segments with no fencing or the use of wrought iron fencing between block columns. The two projects feature two distinct architectural themes. Meritage utilizes an Italianate theme and the Chambray portion features a French Country theme. The Committee provided recommendations to the applicant for further enhancements to each theme: • . DRC COMMENTS DRC2003-00336 AND DRC2003-00337 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES July 1, 2003 Page 2 Italianate -The Committee recommended that the porch and balcony railing elements are wrought iron (or tubular steel) and vary in design across the building elevation. In addition, the committee encouraged the applicant to be generous with the use of stone on this theme type. French Country -They concurred with the applicant's presentation of the French Country theme, however they recommended that the fireplaces be completely clad in stone. The Committee concurred with staff, in that the applicant has made significant and notable progress on the site layout and architectural themes utilized in the projects. The applicant will be preparing a resubmittal to staff to respond to all completeness issues and comments, and the project will return for complete review by the Committee at a future date. C~ C~ DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS • 7:40 p.m. Debra Meier September 2, 2003 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2003-00337 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES - A proposal to develop 270 apartment homes and associated recreation facilities on 11.34 acres of land in the Mixed Use/High Density Residential District (24-30 dwelling units per acre) within the Victoria Arbors Master Plan, located on the west side of Day Creek Boulevard, north of Foothill Boulevard APN: 0227-201- 38, 41, and 42. Project Density: 23.8 dwelling units per acre Design Parameters: The proposed project is within the southern portion of the Victoria Arbor,; Village of the Victoria Planned Community. The land use designation north of the site is Mixecl Use/Medium Density Residential, and south of the site is Mixed Use/High Density Residential. The Southern California Edison transmission corridor and Day Creek Flood Control Channel form they western boundary of the site, and Day Creek Boulevard (which has been rough graded) will form they east boundary of the site. Land Use on the east side of Day Creek Boulevard encompasses they Victoria Gardens Regional Mall. The proposed project interfaces on the south boundary with another Fairfield apartment project (Meritage/DRC2003-00336). Access via a proposed private street is provided along the nortYi boundary, which is shared with the proposed Medium Residential development. Access into Chambray from the north boundary is aresident-only entrance gated, operated by a card-key. The primary entrance into the project is from Day Creek Boulevard. • This project was before the Planning Commission as a workshop on May 14, 2003 (minutes attached) to review the proposed project in conjunction with the Victoria Arbors design guideless for Multi-family development; and before the Design Review Committee on July 1, 2003 (action attached) to review progress on the architectural design and project theme. The Committee, concurred with the applicant's presentation of the French Country theme, however they recommended that the fireplaces be completely clad in stone (which the applicant has provided). Staff Comments: The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion. Major Issues: The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this project: 1. Architectural Icon Trellises: The Victoria Gardens Master Plan Design Guidelines state that trellises and arbors "are architectural icons within Victoria Arbors and must be included within multi-family projects." Although trellises are included in building design, staff would also recommend that they be used as major design elements in the landscape at primar)r project entrance at Day Creek Boulevard. 2. Elevations/Noise Attenuation: Special architectural design features will be required to attenuate traffic noise for residential units within 344 feet of centerline of Day CreeN: Boulevard. These features may include, but are not limited to, sound attenuation walls (rather than wrought iron fencing), lexan panels around private patios and balconies, dual glazed windows, sound baffling materials in exterior vents. Revise elevations as needed • based upon recommendations of noise study (which has not been submitted yet). DRC COMMENTS DRC2003-00337 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATE September 2, 2003 • Page 2 3. Open Space: The project has been designed at the minimum 30 percent common open space requirement; however, is at the maximum density and maximum building coverage allowed. Staff recommends additional open space be provided. 4. Recreational Amenity package: The applicant is required to provide no less than 10 recreation amenities. The project is deficient by 5 amenities according to the Landscape Plan. Staff recommends that specific amenities be provided that focus on children's needs, such as tot lots. The space noted as "large group BBO area," located within the lower left-hand corner of the pool deck, needs further clarification of the facilities provided within that area that are differentiated from the surrounding pool deck. Secondarv Issues: Once all of the major issues have been addressed, and time permitting, thEa Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues: 1. The accessory structures such as the carport and the mail kiosk should be trimmed anti detailed in accordance with the architectural theme and style of the project. For example, the carport's painted steel tube columns are inconsistent with French Country theme. The same carport design is proposed for both the Chambray (French Country) and Meritage (Italianate) projects. 2. Relocate mail kiosk to be adjoining (on same side of drive aisle as) ample parking. The proposed location is an island that will force tenants to park and walk across drive aisle or illegally park within Fire Lane. Another alternative would be to include mailboxes as part of the recreation building. 3. Provide design details of perimeter fencing and walls, including the Day Creek Boulevard street frontage. Design should incorporate noise attenuation features as recommended by noise study. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Committee provide specific direction pertaining to the items noted above, and direct the applicant to make the appropriate revisions prior to final Committee recommendation to the Planning Commission. Attachment Design Review Committee Action: Members Present: Staff Planner: Debra Meier C 1 Commissioner Stewart agreed that the quality of composition roofing material has been bettered ov~sr • the years but she felt Mr. Trudeau's request for his house did not warrant support to change from file to composition shingle. She noted that every house on his street is file and there is a strong community (neighborhood) identity with tile. She felt that changing his roof would not be compatible or consistent with the neighborhood. Commissioners Macias and Fletcher agreed. Both also felt it might be necessary to address the Code to clarify when and if composition shingles would be acceptable for re-roofing. Chairman McNiel explained how historically the issue of roof materials evolved within the City. He recounted his own re-roofing decision and indicated his support for maintaining the direction of requiring file roofs on all new projeds. He said he would not support Mr. Trudeau's request for his house because of the consistency issue with his immediate block. Mr. Buller thanked the Commission and Mr. Trudeau for their time and stated he will work with Mr. Trudeau on how he would like to proceed based on the discussion. fffff D. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2003-00336 - CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES - A proposal to develop 210 apartment homes and associated recreation facilities on 8.78 acres of land in the Mixed Use High Density Multi-Family Residential District (24-30 dwelling units per acre) within the Victoria Arbors Master Plan, located on the west side of Day Creek Boulevard, north of Foothill Boulevard. APN: 0227-201- 39 and 43. • E. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2003-00337 - CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES - A proposal to develop 387 apartment homes and associated recreation facilities on 15.41 acres of land in the Mixed Use High Density Multi-Family Residential District (24-30 dwelling units per acre) within the Victoria Arbors Master Plan, located on the west side of Day Creek Boulevard, north of Foothill Boulevard - APN: 201-201- 38, 41, and 42. Brad Buller, City Planner, explained the workshop format and intent and introduced the applicant. The applicant and their representatives included Chuck Buquet of Charles Joseph Associates, Brian Hall of Architects Orange, and Dan Milch of Fairfield Residential. Mr. Milch provided an overview of the project along with some highlights of the project description for the two projects. Debra Meier, Associate Planner, described to the Commissioners that the primary purpose for the workshop was to review the first multi-family project application that will be reviewed using the Victoria Arbors Master Plan guidelines for multi-family development. She stated the Design Review Committee had previously provided strong direction regarding the expectations for multi-family development in this portion of the community, including appropriate buffering between the multi- famity housing project and the commercial properties on the south and the future medium density residential on the north; and that the guidelines make it clear that multi-family development should not have buildings that line up along the street, or are oriented in a rigid grid pattern, and thatthe sfte design should reflect acampus-like setting. She noted many of these desired elements were not reflected in the project application. She said staff would like direction from the Commission regarding the interpretation of these design guidelines as related to these specific projeds. • Chairman McNeil requested comments from each Commissioner. PC Adjourned Minutes -3- May 14, 2003 ~. Commissioner Macias stated that the applicant should revisit the site design to avoid the "barracks" effect created by the building pattern and arrangement; and that it was important for the applicant to develop focal points within the project, particularly near primary project entries and from Day Creak Boulevard. Commissioner Fletcher asked the applicants to describe any similarities to the existing Fairfield projects of Ironwood and Fairway Palms located in the vicinity of Milliken Avenue and 6th Street. The applicant, Mr. Mitch and his architect Mr. Hall, responded to Mr. Fletchers questions by stating that the Chambray product is similar to the Irownwood/Fairway Palms projects, while the Meritage project is a new design that has evolved from experience in the City, as well as the provisions of the Vctoria Arbors Design Guidelines. Commissioner Stewart indicated that both projects need architectural focal points that make the entries much more prominent. She believed the architecture theme does not include all the required elements as outlined in the design guidelines and this would also include the details that sue incorporated into the carports. She stated the courtyards should also be detailed in keeping with the Tuscan winery theme of the victoria Arbors. In addition, she thought the site plan also needs to be assessed for further compliance with the Master Plan design guidelines. Chairman McNeil reiterated the concern pertaining to the "soldering" effect of the buildings along Day Creek Boulevard. He also expressed concern that the site plan layout has a predominance of open parking, and that even the focus of project entries is open parking spaces. Chairman McNeil also agreed with Commissioner Stewart's comments pertaining to the arohitectural detailing, and suggested that additional design analysis was necessary to conform to the Design Guidelines. • Mr. Buller provided some concluding remarks, and suggested that the applicant consider using 4- or 5-story buildings in order to free up open space and said that staff would look closely at the parking needs analysis within the project. .:.:. F. PRE-APPLICATION REVIEW DRC2003-00427-THARALDSONDEVELOPMENTC,OMPANY- A request for the review of three separate four-story hotels buildings totaling 342 units, three office buildings totaling 15,000 square feet, a 6,000 square foot full-service day spa, a 6,000 square foot sit-down restaurant, and a 3,000 square foot general retail store on 14.75 acres of land in the Industrial Park District (Subarea 12) of the Development Code located on the north side of 4th Street between Mission Vista Drive, Pittsburgh Avenue, and Richmond Place. APN: 0229-263-48. Brad Buller, City Planner, introduced the item and explained the Pre-Application Review process. Larry Madson, Regional Project Manager, Tharaldson Development Company, introduced the project, indicating it was very preliminary in concept and that they were searching for feedback from the Commission on how the property should be developed. He also discussed the design with respect to sensitivity to existing and surrounding area. He commented that he and his company were committed to designing an upscale hotel site project. Carol Plowman, Senior Vice President for Lee and Associates, identified potential businesses and uses that would occupy the remaining buildings along adjacent 4th Street. Mr. Madson provided a modified site design that re-oriented the hotel buildings to reflect a • "horseshoe" design rather than a "soldier" layout per staff recommendations. ~ May 14, 2003 PC Adjourned Minutes DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS . 8:25 p.m. Debra Meier July 1, 2003 ENVIRONMENTALASSESSMENTANDDEVELOPMENTREVIEW DRC2003-00336-CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES -A proposal to develop 210 apartment homes and associated recreation facilities on 8.78 acres of land in the Mixed Use High Density Residential District (24-30 dwelling units per acre) within the Victoria Arbors Master Plan, located on the west side of Day Creek Boulevard, north of Foothill Boulevard - APN: 0227-201-39 and 43. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVLEOPMENTREVIEW DRC2003-00337-CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES - A proposal to develop 387 apartment homes and associated recreation facilities on 15.41 acres of land in the Mixed Use Hi Staff Comments: These two projects were presented as a Planning Commission Workshop on May 14, 2003 (minutes of that meeting attached). The applicant has been working on revisions to the projects that not only respond to issues raised in the Workshop, but also to details identified in the staff completeness letter dated April 29, 2003. The applicant has requested this meetirig with the Committee to discuss only the architectural detailing of the project as it relates to previous Workshop suggestions and the Victoria Arbors Design Guidelines. The applicant will be presenting illustrations of architectural and site details for the Committee's conceptual review. The entire project application will return to the Committee at a later date. • Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Committee review the architectural and other site details and make appropriate recommendations for the applicant's consideration. Design Review Committee Action: Members Present: Larry McNiel, Pam Stewart, Nancy Fong Staff Planner. Debra Meier Staff reiterated to the Committee that the purpose of this meeting was only to review the architectural and site design details as it relates to meeting the intent of the Victoria Arbors Design Guidelines. The entire project will return to the Committee for review at a later date. The applicant reviewed the revisions to the Site Plan that have been made pursuant to comments provided at the Planning Commission Workshop, which was held on May 14, 2003, as well as comments provided by staff. Revisions include a realignment of the buildings along the street frontage, providing larger pockets of open space and utilizing the recreation buildings as project focal points, among other modifications. The Committee encouraged the applicant to explore an open fencing design along Day Creek Boulevard (to the extent that noise mitigation requirements will allow). This could include segmants with no fencing or the use of wrought iron fencing between block columns. The two projects feature two distinct architectural themes. Meritage utilizes an Italianate theme and the Chambray portion features a French Country theme. The Committee provided • recommendations to the applicant for further enhancements to each theme: . DRC COMMENTS DRC2003-00336 AND DRC2003-00337 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES July 1, 2003 Page 2 Italianate -The Committee recommended that the porch and balcony railing elements are wrought iron (or tubular steel) and vary in design across the building elevation. In addition, the committee encouraged the applicant to be generous with the use of stone on this theme type. French Country -They concurred with the applicants presentation of the French Country theme, however they recommended that the fireplaces be completely clad in stone. The Committee concurred with staff, in that the applicant has made significant and notable prograss on the site layout and architectural themes utilized in the projects. The applicantwill be preparing a resubmittal to staff to respond to all completeness issues and comments, and the project will return for complete review by the Committee at a future date. • • DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS • 8:20 p.m. Doug Fenn September 2, 2003 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2003-00605 -STANDARD PACIFIC - A design review of detailed site plan and building elevations for 90single-family lots of a previously approved Tentative Tract 16372 within the Victoria Arbors Master Plan in the Victoria Community Plan located southeast of Victoria Park Lane - APN: 0227-161-141- 147 and 0227-171-126-128, 130-133, 135 and 137-139. Design Parameters: The site is subject to the regulations of the Victoria Arbors Master Plan, which requires the following three architectural styles to reflect a "Wine Country" theme: Bungalow, English Cottage, and Wine Country. The site has been graded and retaining walls constructed. The applicant is proposing a single phased development for the project. The Etiwanda Garden:> Wedding Chapel and vacant land to the north and east of the site is vacant land and Etiwanda Avenue and to the south is Church Street. The proposal includes three floor plans each with three elevation treatments. The square footage of the homes varies in size from 2,142 to 2,810 square feet. The 3 architectural styles proposed include Bungalow, English Cottage, and Wine Country. The homes will also include porches, side on garages, and additional standard architectural features on elevations that back and side on Church Street. Staff Comments: The following comments are intended to provide an outline for CommitteE: discussion. • Maior Issues: The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this project: Architecture - All of the proposed elevations (Bungalow, English Cottage and W ine Country) for each plan are suitable for typical single-family development; however, are not of the level of quality envisioned by the Victoria Arbors Master Plan. The buildings do have shutters wrap around on windows and a minimal of different materials. The level of detail is typical of other tracts in the city and does not meet the intent of setting Victoria Arbors apart as "a very special place in Rancho Cucamonga. It is important that all parts of this village, including residential neighborhoods, reflect an overall design theme and project the unique identity of Victoria Arbors." Refer to Chapter 7, pages 2-5. The Wine Country style is particularly undistinguished and appears as more of a generic Ranch style. Also, on Bungalow and English Cottage plans it is recommended that stone and brick veneer be used on chimneys, respectively. 2. Roofing -Victoria Arbors Master Plan states, "steeper pitched roofs are encouraged (depending on the chosen architectural style)". The Arbors Master Plan specifically identifies a steeply pitched roof as a defining characteristic of the English Cottage style. The Plan's photo examples show pitches greater than 12:12. 3. Front Setbacks -The Development Code requires that front setback vary +/- 5 feet to give streetscape variety and interest. There are locations in where majority of homes in a row all have the minimum 10-foot setback, including, but not limited to, Spring Mountain Drive, Silver Rose Court. Does the Committee feel that the substantial articulation of the front of the three Floor Plans meets the intent? • 4. Usable Rear Yard Area -Lots 106 and 107 do not meet the minimum 15-foot flat usable rear yard unencumbered by slopes. Add retaining wall to push back slope. DRC COMMENTS DRC2003-00605 -STANDARD PACIFIC September 2, 2003 • Page 2 5. Provide street scene elevations of the rear corner elevation of residence along Victoria Parl< Lane and Church Street. 6. Wrap-Around Porches -Provide wrap-around porches, especially on corner lots such as Lots: 1, 7, 13, 20, 46, 66, 96, 97, 109, 112, and 118. The Victoria Arbors Master Plan states, "when possible, the porch shall wrap around the side of the building" (note: an open porch may intrude into the larger side setback). The wrap-around portion may be less than 6 inches in depth). Porch Area -The Victoria Arbors Master Plan requires that the "minimum square footage for private open space in the form of balconies, porches, courtyards, trellis or combination of them shall be 7 percent of the gross floor area of the house product up to a maximum of 200 square feet." None of the Floor Plans have balconies. Floor Plan Floor Area Porch Area Required Floor Area x .07 Porch Area Provided 1 2,142 s.f. 150 s.f. 114 s.f. 2 2,638 s.f. 185 s.f. 64 s.f. 3 2,811 s.f. 197 s.f. 146 s.f. Secondary Issues: Once all of the major issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues: • 1. Most of the front ground level porches are not 8 feet deep as required by Victoria Arbors Master Plan. 2. Fifty percent of finished product should have garage doors with windows as a standard feature include in sales price of home (not optional). 3. When a retaining wall exists in the rear of the property to assist with the 15-foot usable areas, steps should be provided to allow access to maintain the slope rather than slope encroaching into usable yard as proposed on Lots 58-64. 4. Rear treatment of balconies, verandas and/or wrought iron balustrades needs to be used for all of the plans. ' 5. Provide decorative paving/treatment on driveways. To enhance streetscape, decorative paving/treatment should be varied throughout the tract. Policy Issues: The following items are a matter of Planning Commission policy and should be incorporated into the project design without discussion: 1. All walls visible from or facing a street should be decorative masonry on both sides. 2. W hen a retaining wall exists in the rear of the property to assist with, the 15-foot useable areas, steps should be provided to allow access to maintain the slope. 3. All river rock stone should be a natural material (not manufactured). • 4. Access gates to the rear yards shall be constructed from a material more durable than wood gates. Acceptable materials include, but are not limited to, wrought iron and PVC. 5. On corner side yard, walls should be setback 5 feet behind sidewalk to provide IandscapE, planter. DRC COMMENTS DRC2003-00605 -STANDARD PACIFIC September 2, 2003 • Page 3 Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the project be redesigned and return for additional review. Desinn Review Committee Action: Members Present: Staff Planner: Doug Fenn U • DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS • 8:50 p.m. Doug Fenn September 2, 2003 DESIGN REVIEW DRC2003-00661 - GREYSTONE HOMES, INC. - A design review of detailed site plan and building elevations for 21 single-family lots of a previously approved Tentative Tract 16373 within the Victoria Arbors Master Plan in the Victoria Community' Plan located at the northeast corner of Iron Horse Place and Church Street -APN: 1089-171-35. DESIGN REVIEW DRC2003-00662 - GREYSTONE HOMES, INC. - A design review of detailed site plan and building elevations for 70single-family lots of a previously approved Tentative Tract 16372 within the Victoria Arbors Master Plan in the Victoria Community Plan located northwest of Victoria Park Lane and Church Street -APN: 1089-171-32. Design Parameters: The site is subject to the regulations of the Victoria Arbors Master Plan which requires the following three architectural styles to reflect a "Wine Country "theme: Bungalow, French, Rustic Italian, and Tuscan Wine Country. The site has been graded and retaining walls constructed. The applicant is proposing a single phased development for the project. Both proje<:t front along Church Street. The proposal includes three 2-story floor plans, each with 3 elevation treatments. The square footage of the homes varies in size from 3,095 to 3,493 square feet (include garage). The 4 architectural styles proposed include Bungalow, Rustic Italian, and Tuscan Wine Country. The homes will also include porches, side on garages, and additional standard architectural features on elevations that back- and side-on to Church Street. • The proposal does not include the 4 lots along Etiwanda Avenue. These require a separate Conditional Use Permit process and will be different homes. Staff Comments: The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion. Maior Issues: The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this project: Architecture -None. The architect has done a "splendid iob" on the all of the elevations (The architect "Woodly Architectural Group, Inc." is the same firm that redesigned US Home product DRC2003-00191 and 192). Usable Rear Yard -Some lots are essentially built at the minimum setbacks, leaving small rear yards of 15 feet; however, portions are in slope. The Development Code requires .a minimum 15-foot flat usable rear yard unencumbered by slopes. Examples include, but are not limited to, Tract 16372, Lots 25 and 26; Tract 16373, Lot 65. Use retaining walls to pull back toe of slope from homes. Front Setbacks -Stagger setbacks to give streetscape variety and interest. The project should meet or exceed the citywide standard expressed in the Development Code to vary front setback +/- 5 feet. There are locations in Tract 16373 where majority of homes in a row all have the minimum 10-foot setback: Chimney Rock Drive and east side of Duck Creel< Place. • Secondary Issues: Once all of the major issues have been addressed, and time permitting, thf: Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues. Fifty percent of finished product should have garage doors with windows as a standard feature included in sales price of home (not optional). DRC COMMENTS DRC2003-00661 AND DRC2003-00662 - GREYSTONE HOMES, INC. ' September 2, 2003 • Page 2 2. Provide decorative paving/treatment on driveways. To enhance streetscape, decorative paving/treatment should be varied throughout the tract. Policy Issues: The following items are a matter of Planning Commission policy and should be incorporated into the project design without discussion: 1. All walls visible from or facing a street should be decorative masonry on both sides. 2. When a retaining wall exists in the rear of the property to assist with the 15-foot useable areas, steps should be provided to allow access to maintain the slope. 3. All river rock stone should be a natural material (not manufactured). 4. Access gates to the rear yards shall be constructed from a material more durable than wood gates. Acceptable materials include, but are not limited to, wrought iron and PVC. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the project be redesigned and return for additioneil review. Design Review Committee Action: Members Present: . Staff Planner: Doug Fenn • • DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE MEETING ACTION AGENDA AND MINUTES PLANNING CONFERENCE ROOM TUESDAY SEPTEMBER 2, 2003 7:00 P.M. RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER RAINS ROOM 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA Committee Members: Rich Fletcher Larry McNiel Nancy Fong CONSENT CALENDAR The following items are expected to be routine and non-controversial. Typically they are items such as plan revisions prepared in response to discussions at a previous meeting. 7:00 p.m. (Doug/Willie) DESIGN REVIEW DRC2003-00664 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOICATE - A • request for an approximately 301,075 square foot industrial building on 14.12 acres in the General Industrial District (Subarea 14) at the southwest corner of Santa Anita and 6th Street -APN: 0229-283-23 and 48. PROJECT REVIEW ITEMS This is the time and place for the Committee to discuss and provide direction to an applicant regarding their development application. The following items do not legally require any public; testimony, although the Committee may open the meeting for public input. 7:10 p.m. (Debra/Rene) ENVIRONMENTALIMPACTREPORTANDSUBTT14749-TRAIGHPACIFIC-A proposed subdivision of 168.77 acres into 269 residential lots and a remainder parcel in the Low Density Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre) and Flood Control, located north of the Southern California Edison Corridor between Etiwanda Avenue and East Avenue within the Etiwanda North Specific Plan - APN: 0225-083-05, 06, 07, 10, 22, 23, 25, 26; and 0225-084-02. Related Files: DRC2003-00409, DRC2003-00410, and DRC2003-00411. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT AND ETIWANDA NORTH SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2003-00409 -TRAIGHPACIFIC -A proposed Etiwanda North Specific Plan Amendment of 168.77 acres of land from Very-Low Density Residential (.1-2 dwelling units per acre), to Low, Density Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) and Flood Control/Resource Conservation, and master-planned circulation modifications to the north, for land located north of the Southern • California Edison corridor between Etiwanda Avenue and East Avenue - APN: 0225-083-05, 06, 07, 10, 21-26; and 0225-084-02, 03. Related Files: SUBTT14729, DRC2003-00410 and DRC2003-00411. • DRC AGENDA September 2, 2003 Page 2 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2003-00410 -TRAIGH PACIFIC - A proposed General Plan Amendment of 168.77 acres of land from Very-Low Density Residential (.1-2 dwelling units per acre), to Low Density Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) and Conservation, for land located north of the Southern California Edison corridor between Etiwanda Avenue and East Avenue -APN: 0225-083-02, 06, 07, 10, 22, 23, 26. Related Files: SUBTT14729, DRC2003-00409 and DRC2003-00411. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT" DRC2003-00411 -TRAIGH PACIFIC - A proposed Development Agreement to address specific conditions of development and annexation for 168.77 acres of land located north of the Southern California Edison corridor between Etiwanda Avenue and East Avenue within the Etiwanda North Specific Plan - APN: 0225-083-05, 06, 07, 10, 22, 23, 25, 26; and 0225-084-02. Related Files: SUBTT14749, DRC2003-00409 and DRC2003-00410. ANNEXATION TO THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA-TRAIGH PACIFIC - Aproposed Annexation of approximately 240 acres of land into the City of Rancho Cucamonga, located within the Etiwanda North Specific Plan north of the lower Southern California Edison corridor between Etiwanda Avenue and East Avenue - APN: 0225-083-05, 06, 07, 10, 21-26; and 0225-084-02, 03. Related Files: • SUBTT14749, DRC2003-00409, DRC2003-00410 and DRC2002-00411 7:50 p.m. (Duane/Willie) ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAPSUBTT1632U - ACI GROUP - A request to subdivide 4.9 acres of land into 7single-family lots in the Very Low Residential District (1-2 dwelling units per acre), located east of Hermosa Avenue, south of the intersection of Vista Grove Street at Rocky Mountain Place, north of Woodridge Drive -APN: 1074-231-04 and 05. 8:10 p.m (Emily/Cam) DRC2002-01023 - STOR-N-LOCK PARTNERS -A request to construct a 71,664 square foot self storage facility located on the southwest corner of Arrow Route and White Oak Avenue in the General Industrial District, Subarea 8 - APN: 0209-145-01. (Emily) (Eng -Cam) PUBLIC COMMENTS This is the time and place for the general public to address the Committee. State law prohibits the Committee from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Committee may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are limited to five minutes per individual. ADJOURNMENT • CONSENT CALENDAR COMMENTS • 7:00 p.m. Doug Fenn September 2, 2003 DESIGN REVIEW DRC2003-00664 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATE - A request for an approximately 301,075 square foot industrial building on 14.12 acres in the General Industrial District (Subarea 14) at the southwest corner of Santa Anita and 6th Street - APN: 0229-283-23 and 48. PLANS WILL BE AVAILABLE AT THE MEETING. Design Review Committee Action: Members Present: Larry McNiel, Rich Fletcher, Nancy Fong Staff Planner: Doug Fenn Staff presented the development plans to the Committee at the meeting. Staff stated that the site was previously approved with a speculative industrial project. Because there is a specific user, the building is now a build to suit, which required an increase to the size of the building. Staff stated that the building design matches the previous approval with additional upgrades to the office area. The Committee reviewed the development plans and recommended approval of the project. C~ DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS • 7:10 p.m. Debra Meier September 2, 2003 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT AND SUBTT14749 -TRAIGH PACIFIC - A proposed subdivision of 168.77 acres into 269 residential lots and a remainder parcel in the Low Density Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre) and Flood Control, located north of the Southern California Edison Corridor between Etiwanda Avenue and East Avenue within the Etiwanda North Specific Plan -APN: 0225-083-05, 06, 07, 10, 22, 23, 25, 26; and 0225-084-02. Related Files: DRC2003-00409, DRC2003-00410, and DRC2003-00411. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT AND ETIWANDA NORTH SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2003-00409 -TRAIGH PACIFIC - A proposed Etiwanda North Specific Plan Amendment of 168.77 acres of land from Very-Low Density Residential (.1-2 dwelling units per acre), to Low, Density Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) and Flood Control/Resource Conservation, and master-planned circulation modifications to the north, for land located north of the Southern California Edison corridor between Etiwanda Avenue and East Avenue -APN: 0225-083-05, 06, 07, . 10, 21-26; and 0225-084-02, 03. Related Files: SUBTT14729, DRC2003-00410 and DRC2003- 00411. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2003-00410 - TRAIGH PACIFIC - A proposed General Plan Amendment of 168.77 acres of land from Very-Low Density Residential (.1-2 dwelling units per acre), to Low Density Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) and Conservation, for land located north of the Southern California Edison corridor between Etiwanda Avenue and East Avenue -APN: 0225-083-02, 06, 07, 10, 22, 23, 26. Related Files: SUBTT14729, DRC2003-00409 and DRC2003-00411. . ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT DRC2003-00411 - TRAIGH PACIFIC - A proposed Development Agreement to address specific conditions of development and annexation for 168.77 acres of land located north of the Southern California Edison corridor between Etiwanda Avenue and East Avenue within the Etiwanda North Specific Plan -APN: 0225-083-05, 06, 07, 10, 22, 23, 25, 26; and 0225-084-02. Related Files: SUBTT14749, DRC2003-00409 and DRC2003-00410. ANNEXATION TO THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA -TRAIGH PACIFIC - A proposed Annexation of approximately 240 acres of land into the City of Rancho Cucamonga, located within the Etiwanda North Specific Plan north of the lower Southern California Edison corridor between Etiwanda Avenue and East Avenue -APN: 0225-083-05, 06, 07, 10, 21-26; and 0225-084-02, 03. Related Files: SUBTT14749, DRC2003-00409, DRC2003-00410 and DRC2002-00411. Design Parameters: The project site is within an unincorporated area north of the current City limits, located north of the lower Southern California Edison corridor between Etiwanda Avenue and East Avenue/Etiwanda Creek. Along with the Tentative Tract Map and associated applications, the applicant also proposes annexation to the City of Rancho Cucamonga of approximately 240 acres. Of the gross site area, only 107.28 acres will actually be developed, the remaining acreage lies within the confines of Etiwanda Creek and adjacent County Flood Control properties. The City limit borders the site on the west with the annexation of Rancho Etiwanda Estates in 2002; and an additional tentative tract map (Richland Development) and annexation, which currently is on progress immediately to the south. • DRC COMMENTS SUBTT14749, DRC2003-00409, DRC2003-00410, DRC21003-00411 -TRAIGH PACIFIC • September 2, 2003 Page 2 The project lies within the Upper Etiwanda Neighborhood of the Etiwanda North Specific Plan, with a present land use designation of Very Low Residential (.1-2 dwelling units per acre). The applicant proposes to amend the Specific Plan and the General Plan to Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre); the net density of the project site is 2.5 dwelling units per acre. This density is comparable to Rancho Etiwanda Estates, which has an average density of 3.3 dwelling units per acre and also included an Etiwanda North Specific Plan Amendment and General Plan Amendment for Very Low Residential to Low Residential. Both Rancho Etiwanda Estates to the west and this project are designed as private-gated communities. The proposed Tentative Tract Map contains 269 lots for future single-family detached homes with a minimum lot area of 8,400 square feet, and an average lot size of 11, 600 square feet. The site slopes uniformly from north to south at approximately 7 percent gradient. The site is located in the Etiwanda Creek watershed, requiring construction of a storm water channel along the north boundary in order to convey flows from the north to Etiwanda Creek. The creek forms the east boundary of the project, and contains a Community Trail along the top of the levee. A master-planned Community Trail will be developed along the east tract boundary on top of the levee on the western edge of Etiwanda Creek. Also, a Community Trail will continue along the west boundary of the site parallel to the reduced Etiwanda Avenue road section. The proposed Community Trail improvements will provide connections to the General Plan Regional Trails that are planned to be located along the Southern California Edison • Staff Comments: The applicant has responded to design modifications to the Tentative Tract Map throughout the completeness review of the project. The Conceptual Landscape Plan has been designed in accordance with the Etiwanda North Specific Plan Guidelines pertaining to the "Lower Crest Collector," the neighborhood entry monumentation, and the palette of street trees and slope planting materials. Unique issues pertinent to the application and design that warrant special Committee consideration include the following: OPEN SPACE SITES Two open space lots are provided as a result of the Tentative Tract Map, a 2.71-acre Lot'E' on the east boundary and a 3.1-acre Lot'F' on the west boundary. The use of the eastern parcel, located adjacent to Etiwanda Creek, is being considered for a Community Equestrian Facility. This facility is anticipated to include an enclosed arena and an assortment of outdoor warming arenas. The goal is to coordinate with Southern California Edison to provide parking for the facility on the Southern California Edison corridor. The use of the western parcel is being considered as a trailhead and interpretive kiosk for the North Etiwanda Habitat Preserve. This would conceptually include a parking lot, restroom, and drinking fountain, along with an interpretive kiosk pertaining to the habitat and special features of the Preserve. From this point individuals or groups could walk into the Preserve for nature study or hiking opportunities. The applicant continues to work with staff in the evolution of these unique open space sites. The description of specific improvements anticipated with the development will be outlined in the Development Agreement, prior to public hearings. GATED COMMUNITY The applicant proposes a gated community, similar in concept to Rancho Etiwanda Estates, which is located immediately to the west. Staff supports gated communities at this locations to limit and . control public access in the vicinity of the North Etiwanda Habitat Preserve and the northern area surrounding the City Sphere of Influence. Access to the few private properties that remain north of the project is maintained along Etiwanda Avenue through the use of a reduced street improvement section and a Community Equestrian Trail. DRC COMMENTS SUBTT14749, DRC2003-00409, DRC2003-00410, DRC21003-00411 - TRAIGH PACIFIC September 2, 2003 • Page 3 LANDSCAPE THEME The project should conform to the design concepts established by the Etiwanda North Specific Plan: The north, south, and east project perimeter should be Canary Island Pine and Western Redbud trees. Accent trees should not include Western Redbud. 2. The Upper Etiwanda Neighborhood Entry, at the corner of East and Lower Crest, should be substantially increased in size (depth) consistent with Etiwanda North Specific Plan Exhibit "25" (A) and (B). This should be accomplished by pushing the theme wall into the project site and increasing its radius. The Upper Etiwanda Neighborhood Entry, at the corner of East and Lower Crest, should include meandering battered walls of cut stone consistent with Etiwanda North Specific Plan Exhibit "25" (A) and (B). Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Committee make any recommendations as deemed necessary pertinent to the design or concept of the tentative tract map, or associated applications. The Draft EIR is being prepared at this time; a Draft is anticipated near the end of September. The entire project will be forwarded to the Planning Commission during the EIR public comment hearing, which is anticipated in October. • Attachment Design Review Committee Action: Members Present: Larry McNiel, Rich Fletcher, Nancy Fong Staff Planner: Debra Meier Staff provided a summary of the issues associated with this portion of the City's Sphere of Influence; and an outline of the history of this project. In addition, staff reviewed the overall design concept of the project and the relationship with the Rancho Etiwanda Estates project which was annexed in February 2002. ' Staff explained the unique conceptual use and design of the Open Space parcels. The applicant provided conceptual designs based on criteria that had been provided by staff during earlier meetings. The Open Space parcels will continue to evolve in design during the period prior to public hearings. And finally, staff provided an outline of the project processing status including the anticipated completion of the EIR and the anticipated public hearing schedule. The Committee recommended approval of the project with no additional modifications • I I ~• i ~~ i. i i i ELEVATION PINES av swc ar sror¢ wi oowc w a ~av m~arrn LANDSCAPE EASEMENT REDBUD CAtlARY ISLAND PINE JAPANESE PAGODA TREE r Mdl CVT STOME VENEER wl1LL wl CONG W a rll/s'fEN t<Xl"~~ ~ ~ Etiwanda North Specific Plan Ranchn Cuc~wgnea ~) ~., MAXCUT STONE VY NCONC ETE CAP MAX. CUT STONE MEANDEPoNG BATTERED WALL • UPPER ETIWANDA NEIGHBORHOOD ENTRY SECTION ' EXHIBIT 2516) •, Etiwanda North III_79 Specific Plan City of ' Rancho Cucamonga SECT70N 6' CUT STONE VENEER WALL W/ CONCRETE CAP DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS • 7:50 p.m. Duane Morita September 2, 2003 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16320 -ACI GROUP - Arequest tosubdivide 4.9 acres of land into 7single-family lots in the Very Low Residential District (1-2 dwelling units per acre), located east of Hermosa Avenue, south of the intersection of Vista Grove Street at Rocky Mountain Place, north of Woodridge Drive - APN: 1074-231-04 and 05. Design Parameters: The proposed 7 custom lots range in size from 20,141 square feet to 31,628 square feet; the average lot size is 22,533 square feet. The project site is infill and is surrounded entirely by other single-family residential development. The proposed project will be of similar design and lot size to surrounding residential development. A network of Local Trail easements will also be provided which allows each individual lot to connect with the existing Community Trail that is located along the north side of Vista Grove Street. Access to the proposed lots will be off of W oodbridge Drive via a 36-foot wide cul-de-sac. The bulb of the cul-de-sac will be located just south of Vista Grove Street. A rolled curb and concrete pavers will be provided at the end of the proposed cul-de-sac to provide secondary access to Vista Grove Street for emergency vehicles . This particular roadway design best responds to concerns and needs of the neighboring residents and the City's Fire Department. The Fire Department requires entry through the project site so fire trucks can gain emergency access to existing residences along Woodbridge Drive. A thru street would satisfy the needs of the Fire Department, but would conflict with the opinions of the neighboring residents. They believe a thru street would result in increased • traffic, speeding cars, and other hazardous conditions within the existing neighborhood. The cul-de-sac design, as currently proposed, has been reviewed and found acceptable by the neighboring residents and the City's Fire, Engineering, and Planning Departments. It should be noted that proposed residential product has not yet been designed or submitted for City review; the applicant intends on selling the project as custom lots. The Design Review Committee and Planning Commission will have an opportunityto review the building designs when submitted in the near future. The site is vacant and undeveloped. Approximately 100 Eucalyptus trees are located on-site. The arborist report that was prepared for the project indicates that the trees are over 60 years old and are predominantly located along the northern and eastern boundaries of the project site. Since custom lots are proposed, it is presently unknown what and how many trees would actually be removed or affected. Project construction will require issuance of a tree removal permit. Staff Comments: The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion. Maior Issues: The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this project: 1. The Trails Advisory Committee recommended that the Design Review Committee review the project's Wall and Fence Plan. Though the project will construct custom lots, the Trails Advisory Committee believed that design continuity and consistency of the walls and fences within the proposed subdivision was important and necessary. The proposed Wall and Fence Plan shows the following: (a) wrought iron fencing will be provided along the northern boundary (along Vista Grove Street), (b) perimeter walls will be slump block with pilasters and flat caps, and (c) interior lot and trail walls will be combination concrete base (approximately 2 to 3 feet) topped with wrought iron fence (approximately 4 to 5 feet). No wood fencing is proposed. DRC COMMENTS SUBTT 16320-ACI GROUP • September 2, 2003 Page 2 Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the proposed project. Design Review Committee Action: Members Present: Larry McNiel, Rich Fletcher, Nancy Fong Staff Planner: Duane Morita The Committee reviewed the proposed Wall and Fence Plan and recommended approval of the project with the following condition: Provide a solid slump stone wall material on the north sides of Lots 3 and 4 to screen the rear yards along Vista Grove Street from public view. The solid wall should go from the rear property lines to the approximate return walls of the future homes. • • DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS • 8:10 p.m. Emily Wimer September 2, 2003 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DESIGN REVIEW DRC2002-01023 - STOR-N-LOCK PARTNERS -A request to construct a 71,664 square foot self storage facility located on 4.21 acres of land on the southwest corner of Arrow Route and White Oak Avenue in the General Industrial District, Subarea 8 - APN: 0209-145-01. Design Parameters: The project is abutting an existing industrial site to the south by an existing industrial complex and to the west by a parking lot. The proposal is for two self-storage buildings totaling 68,457 square feet, a management office of 1,470 square feet, and an upper level manager's residence of approximately 1,737 square feet. There is one driveway on each street frontage, which is shared with the existing industrial building to the south. The project incorporates pedestrian access and walkways on both streets with a combination of berms and low walls for retaining purposes. The site contains numerous mature trees, some of which are proposed for removal; however, the majority of existing trees within the streetscape setbacks will be saved. The main elevation from White Oak Avenue incorporates materials and decorative elements such as a decorative glazing system on the second story portion of the building, pillars, and decorative file accents. Reveal lines, recessed wall planes, cornice trim and file accents are incorporated in the 360-degree architecture. Staff Comments: The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion. • Maior issues: The following broad design issues will be the focus of the Committee discussion regarding this project: There are no major issues. The applicant has worked diligently with staff to resolve any major issues. Secondary Issues: Once all of the major issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues: 1. Metal Trellis -The last public storage project, one block to the west on Arrow Route, to use metal trellis along the perimeter wall suffered graffiti. Vandals climbed up trellis. Applicant should explore with staff other solutions. 2. Landscaping -Utilize the principles of Xeriscape to conserve water, such as reducing the turf area by introducing river rock cobble fields along street frontages. 3. The number of signs shown on Elevations exceeds the maximum 3 signs allowed. The Sign Ordinance allows a maximum of 2 wall signs, plus one monument sign per street frontage, with a combination of wall and monument signs not to exceed 3 total. 4. Provide a decorative drive with the primary entry on White Oak Avenue to match the Arrow Route entry. The stamped and colored concrete shall extend through the shared driveway access. The developer shall work with the adjoining property owner to allow decorative paving. • Policy issues: Downspouts for the building shall be located in the loading/ unloading area only and should not be seen from public view. DRC COMMENTS DRC2002-01023 - STOR-N-LOCK September 2, 2003 • Page 2 Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Committee review the project and recommend approval to the Planning Commission. Design Review Committee Action: Members Present: Larry McNiel, Rich Fletcher, Nancy Fong Staff Planner: Emily Wimer The Committee directed the applicant to revise the plans as listed below; and to submit the revised plans for their review under the consent calendar at the September 16, 2003, meeting. 1. Extend the split-face block on the archways of the building. 2. Shorten the height of the main tower element facing the intersection. 3. Additional of decorative materials for the driveway off W hite Oak Avenue. 4. Reduce the total number of signs to three including the moment. 5. The applicant has also agreed to design a trellis feature that is non-climable, and lighter weight. U • DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS • September 2, 2003 PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no public comments at this time. ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 8:40 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Brad Buller Secretary • • • DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE MEETING PLANNING CONFERENCE ROOM TUESDAY SEPTEMBER 2, 2003 7:00 P.M. RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER RAINS ROOM 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA • Committee Members: Rich Fletcher Larry McNiel CONSENT CALENDAR Nancy Fong The following items are expected to be routine and non-controversial. Typically they are items such as plan revisions prepared in response to discussions at a previous meeting. 7:00 p.m. (Doug/Willie) DESIGN REVIEW DRC2003-00664 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOICATE - A request for an approximately 301,075 square foot industrial building oh 14.12 acres in the General Industrial District (Subarea 14) at the southwest corner of Santa Anita and 6th Street - APN: 0229-283-23 and 48. PROJECT REVIEW ITEMS This is the time and place for the Committee to discuss and provide direction to an applicant regarding their development application. The following items do not legally require any public testimony, although the Committee may open the meeting for public input. 7:10 p.m. (Debra/Rene) ENVIRONMENTALIMPACTREPORTANDSUBTT14749-TRAIGHPACIFIC-A proposed subdivision of 168.77 acres into 269 residential lots and a remainder parcel in the Low Density Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre) and Flood Control, located north of the Southern California Edison Corridor between Etiwanda Avenue and East Avenue within the Etiwanda North Specific Plan - APN: 0225-083-05, 06, 07, 10, 22, 23, 25, 26; and 0225-084-02. Related Files: DRC2003-00409, DRC2003-00410, and DRC2003-00411. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT AND ETIWANDA NORTH SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2003-00409 -TRAIGHPACIFIC -A proposed Etiwanda North Specific Plan Amendment of 168.77 acres of land from Very-Low Density Residential (.1-2 dwelling units per acre), to Low, Density Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) and Flood Control/Resource Conservation, and master-planned circulation modifications to the north, for land located north of the Southern California Edison corridor between Etiwanda Avenue and East Avenue - APN: 0225-083-05, 06, 07, 10, 21-26; and 0225-084-02, 03. Related Files: SUBTT14729, DRC2003-00410 and DRC2003-00411. • DRC AGENDA September 2, 2003 Page 2 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2003-00410 -TRAIGH PACIFIC - A proposed General Plan Amendment of 168.77 acres of land from Very-Low Density Residential (.1-2 dwelling units per acre), to Low Density Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) and Conservation, for land located north of the Southern California Edison corridorbetween Etiwanda Avenue and East Avenue -APN: 0225-083-02, 06, 07, 10, 22, 23, 26. Related Files: SUBTT14729, DRC2003-00409 and DRC2003-00411. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT DRC2003-00411 -TRAIGH PACIFIC - A proposed Development Agreement to address specific conditions of development and annexation for 168.77 acres of land located north of the Southern California Edison corridor between Etiwanda Avenue and East Avenue within the Etiwanda North Specific Plan ' - APN: 0225-083-05, 06, 07, 10, 22, 23, 25, 26; and 0225-084-02. Related Files: SUBTT14749, DRC2003-00409 and DRC2003-00410. ANNEXATION TO THE CITY OFRANCHO CUCAMONGA-TRAIGH PACIFIC - Aproposed Annexation of approximately 240 acres of land into the City of Rancho Cucamonga, located within the Etiwanda North Specific Plan north of the lower Southern California Edison corridor between Etiwanda Avenue and East Avenue - APN: 0225-083-05, 06, 07, 10, 21-26; and 0225-084-02, 03. Related Files: • SUBTT14749, DRC2003-00409, DRC2003-00410 and DRC2002-00411 7:50 p.m. (Duane/Willie) ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAPSUBTT16320 -ACI GROUP - A request to subdivide 4.9 acres of land into 7single-family lots in the Very Low Residential District (1-2 dwelling units per acre), located east of Hermosa Avenue, south of the intersection of Vista Grove Street at Rocky Mountain Place, north of Woodridge Drive -APN: 1074-231-04 and 05. 8:10 p.m (Emily/Cam) DRC2002-01023 -~STOR-N-LOCK PARTNERS -A request to construct a 71,664 square foot self storage facility located on the southwest corner of Arrow Route and White Oak Avenue in the General Industrial District, Subarea 8 - APN: 0209-145-01. (Emily) (Eng -Cam) PUBLIC COMMENTS This is the time and place for the general public to address the Committee. State law prohibits the Committee from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Committee may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are limited to five minutes per individual. ADJOURNMENT 1, Mary Lou Gragg, Office Specialist 11 for the City of Rancho Cucamonga, hereby certify that a true, • accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on August 28, 2003 at least 72 hours prior to the meeting per Government Code Section 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Cerrter Drive O~ancho Cucamonga. CONSENT CALENDAR COMMENTS 7:00 p.m. Doug Fenn September 2, 2003 DESIGN REVIEW DRC2003-00664 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOICATE - A request for an approximately 301,075 square foot industrial building on 14.12 acres in the General Industrial District (Subarea 14) at the southwest corner of Santa Anita and 6th Street - APN: 0229-283-23 and 48. PLANS WILL BE AVAILABLE AT THE MEETING. Design Review Committee Action: Members Present: Staff Planner: Doug Fenn • DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS • 7:10 p.m. Debra Meier September 2, 2003 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT AND SUBTT14749 -TRAIGH PACIFIC - A proposed subdivision of 168.77 acres into 269 residential lots and a remainder parcel in the Low Density Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre) and Flood Control, located north of the Southern California Edison Corridor between Etiwanda Avenue and East Avenue within the Etiwanda North Specific Plan -APN: 0225-083-05, 06, 07, 10, 22, 23, 25, 26; and 0225-084-02. Related Files: DRC2003-00409, DRC2003-00410, and DRC2003-00411. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT AND ETIWANDA NORTH SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2003-00409 -TRAIGH PACIFIC - A proposed Etiwanda North Specific Plan Amendment of 168.77 acres of land from Very-Low Density Residential (.1-2 dwelling units per acre), to Low, Density Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) and Flood Control/Resource Conservation, and master-planned circulation modifications to the north, for land located north of the Southern California Edison corridor between Etiwanda Avenue and East Avenue -APN: 0225-083-05, 06, 07, 10, 21-26; and 0225-084-02, 03. Related Files: SUBTT14729, DRC2003-00410 and DRC2003- 00411. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2003-00410 - TRAIGH PACIFIC - A proposed General Plan Amendment of 168.77 acres of land from Very-Low Density Residential (.1-2 dwelling units per acre), to Low Density Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) and Conservation, for land located north of the Southern California Edison corridor between Etiwanda Avenue and East Avenue -APN: 0225-083-02, 06, 07, 10, 22, 23, 26. Related Files: SUBTT14729, DRC2003-00409 and DRC2003-00411. • ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT DRC2003-00411 - TRAIGH PACIFIC - A proposed Development Agreement to address specific conditions of development and annexation for 168.77 acres of land located north of the Southern California Edison corridor between Etiwanda Avenue and East Avenue within the Etiwanda North Specific Plan -APN: 0225-083-05, 06, 07, 10, 22, 23, 25, 26; and 0225-084-02. Related Files: SUBTT14749, DRC2003-00409 and DRC2003-00410. ANNEXATION TO THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA -TRAIGH PACIFIC - A proposed Annexation of approximately 240 acres of land into the City of Rancho Cucamonga, located within the Etiwanda North Specific Plan north of the lower Southern California Edison corridor between Etiwanda Avenue and East Avenue -APN: 0225-083-05, 06, 07, 10, 21-26; and 0225-084-02, 03. Related Files: SUBTT14749, DRC2003-00409, DRC2003-00410 and DRC2002-00411. Design Parameters: The project site is within an unincorporated area north of the current Cily limits, located north of the lower Southern California Edison corridor between Etiwanda Avenue and East Avenue/Etiwanda Creek. Along with the Tentative Tract Map and associated applications, the applicant also proposes annexation to the City of Rancho Cucamonga of approximately 240 acres. Of the gross site area, only 107.28 acres will actually be developed, the remaining acreage lies within the confines of Etiwanda Creek and adjacent County Flood Control properties. The City limit borders the site on the west with the annexation of Rancho Etiwanda Estates in 2002; and an additional tentative tract map (Richland Development) and annexation, which currently is on progress immediately to the south. • DRC COMMENTS SUBTT14749, DRC2003-00409, DRC2003-00410, DRC21003-00411 -TRAIGH PACIFIC September 2, 2003 • Page 2 The project lies within the Upper Etiwanda Neighborhood of the Etiwanda North Specific Plan, with a present land use designation of Very Low Residential (.1-2 dwelling units per acre). The applicant proposes to amend the Specific Plan and the General Plan to Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre); the net density of the project site is 2.5 dwelling units per acre. This density is comparable to Rancho Etiwanda Estates, which has an average density of 3.3 dwelling units per acre and also included an Etiwanda North Specific Plan Amendment and General Plan Amendment for Very Low Residential to Low Residential. Both Rancho Etiwanda Estates to the west and this project are designed as private-gated communities. The proposed Tentative Tract Map contains 269 lots for future single-family detached homes with a minimum lot area of 8,400 square feet, and an average lot size of 11, 600 square feet. The site slopes uniformly from north to south at approximately 7 percent gradient. The site is located in the Etiwanda Creek watershed, requiring construction of a storm water channel along the north boundary in order to convey flows from the north to Etiwanda Creek. The creek forms the east boundary of the project, and contains a Community Trail along the top of the levee. A master-planned Community Trail will be developed along the east tract boundary on top of the levee on the western edge of Etiwanda Creek. Also, a Community Trail will continue along the west boundary of the site parallel to the reduced Etiwanda Avenue road section. The proposed Community Trail improvements will provide connections to the General Plan Regional Trails that are planned to be located along the Southern California Edison • Staff Comments: The applicant has responded to design modifications to the Tentative Tract Map throughout the completeness review of the project. The Conceptual Landscape Plan has been designed in accordance with the Etiwanda North Specific Plan Guidelines pertaining to the "Lower Crest Collector," the neighborhood entry monumentation, and the palette of street trees and slope planting materials. Unique issues pertinent to the application and design that warrant special Committee consideration include the following: OPEN SPACE SITES Two open space lots are provided as a result of the Tentative Tract Map, a 2.71-acre Lot'E' on the east boundary and a 3.1-acre Lot'F' on the west boundary. The use of the eastern parcel, located adjacent to Etiwanda Creek, is being considered for a Community Equestrian Facility. This facility is anticipated to include an enclosed arena and an assortmentof outdoorwarming arenas. The goal is to coordinate with Southern California Edison to provide parking for the facility on the Southern California Edison corridor. The use of the western parcel is being considered as a trailhead and interpretive kiosk for the North Etiwanda Habitat Preserve. This would conceptually include a parking lot, restroom, and drinking fountain, along with an interpretive kiosk pertaining to the habitat and special features of the Preserve. From this point individuals or groups could walk into the Preserve for nature study or hiking opportunities. The applicant continues to work with staff in the evolution of these unique open space sites. The description of specific improvements anticipated with the development will be outlined in the Development Agreement, prior to public hearings. GATED COMMUNITY The applicant proposes a gated community, similar in concept to Rancho Etiwanda Estates, which is located immediately to the west. Staff supports gated communities at this locations to limit and • control public access in the vicinity of the North Etiwanda Habitat Preserve and the northern area surrounding the City Sphere of Influence. Access to the few private properties that remain north of the project is maintained along Etiwanda Avenue through the use of a reduced street improvement section and a Community Equestrian Trail. DRC COMMENTS SUBTT14749, DRC2003-00409, DRC2003-00410, DRC21003-00411 - TRAIGH PACIFIC September 2, 2003 • Page 3 LANDSCAPE THEME The project should conform to the design concepts established by the Etiwanda North Specific Plan: The north, south, and east project perimeter should be Canary Island Pine and Western Redbud trees. Accent trees should not include Western Redbud. 2. The Upper Etiwanda Neighborhood Entry, at the corner of East and Lower Crest, should be substantially increased in size (depth) consistent with Etiwanda North Specific Plan Exhibit "25" (A) and (B). This should be accomplished by pushing the theme wall into the project site and increasing its radius. The Upper Etiwanda Neighborhood Entry, at the corner of East and Lower Crest, should include meandering battered walls of cut stone consistent with Etiwanda North Specific Plan Exhibit "25" (A) and (B). Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Committee make any recommendations as deemed necessary pertinent to the design or concept of the tentative tract map, or associated applications. The Draft EIR is being prepared at this time; a Draft is anticipated near the end of September. The entire project will be forwarded to the Planning Commission during the EIR public comment hearing, which is anticipated in October. • Attachment Design Review Committee Action: Members Present: Staff Planner: Debra Meier • i • W ICY .~,~~ I ~~ ;~~ z~ y 't~~ REDBUD CANARY ISLAND PINE ` .JAPANESE PAGODA TREE 11r •y~~~ 1 *~ ' W'b it' 11~= tt ~ k, ~ a ~ ~~ ELEVATION ,~ ,~ .90' WX CUT STONE WI CONC. W a LOW VIASTFA - LANDSCAPE EASEMENT; sroewALK PLAN UPPER ETIWANDA NEl( awns5 sicN vANE LANDSCAPE EASEMENT a' MMIN CUT STOME VENEEP WAIL wr conk, uv a vnrLSreq ENTRY EXHIBIT 25lA) • Etiwanda North Specific Plan IZI-78 ' ~ 6 City of Rancho Cucan~onRa PINES C~ ~,,,.., \ I ~ . 6' CUT STONE VENEER WALL W/ CONCRETE CAP 30' MAXCUT STONE VENEER SIGN WALL t3 r~5 WI CONCRETE CAP t ~ ~ „N, ~_ r K, _ _ ~ ~~ I '`~~~ W~ ~ ~ ~~ • tuE'c.' ~... 4....+ .l~..f .sr' ... it .. ~ :T9 • PRIVATE LOT SECTION SHRUBS AND GROUNDCOVER TURF AREA MAX. CLR STONE MEANDERING BATTERED WALL 4' SIDEWALK ~ /3 UPPER ETIWANDA NEIGHBORHOOD ENTRY SECTION IXH/BlT 25(B) • Etiwanda North 211_79 Specific Plan City of Rancho Cucamo~Ra DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS • 7:50 p.m. Duane Morita September 2, 2003 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16320-ACI GROUP - Arequest tosubdivide 4.9 acres of land into 7single-family lots in the Very Low Residential District (1-2 dwelling units per acre), located east of Hermosa Avenue, south of the intersection of Vista Grove Street at Rocky Mountain Place, north of Woodridge Drive - APN: 1074-231-04 and 05. Design Parameters: The proposed 7 custom lots range in size from 20,141 square feet to 31,628 square feet; the average lot size is 22,533 square feet. The project site is infill and is surrounded entirety by other single-family residential development. The proposed project will be of similar design and lot size to surrounding residential development. A network of Local Trail easements will also be provided which allows each individual lot to connect with the existing Community Trail that is located along the north side of Vista Grove Street. Access to the proposed lots will be off of Woodbridge Drive via a 36-foot wide cul-de-sac. The bulb of the cul-de-sac will be located just south of Vista Grove Street. A rolled curb and concrete pavers will be provided at the end of the proposed cul-de-sac to provide secondary access to Vista Grove Street for emergency vehicles . This particular roadway design best responds to concerns and needs of the neighboring residents and the City's Fire Department. The Fire Department requires entry through the project site so fire trucks can gain emergency access to existing residences along Woodbridge Drive. A thru street would satisfy the needs of the Fire Department, but would conflict with the opinions of the neighboring residents. They believe a thru street would result in increased • traffic, speeding cars, and other hazardous conditions within the existing neighborhood. The cul-de-sac design, as currently proposed, has been reviewed and found acceptable by the neighboring residents and the City's Fire, Engineering, and Planning Departments. It should be noted that proposed residential product has not yet been designed or submitted for City review; the applicant intends on selling the project as custom lots. The Design Review Committee and Planning Commission will have an opportunity to review the building designs when submitted in the near future. The site is vacant and undeveloped. Approximately 100 Eucalyptus trees are located on-site. The arborist report that was prepared for the project indicates that the trees are over 60 years old and are predominantly located along the northern and eastern boundaries of the project site. Since custom lots are proposed, it is presently unknown what and how many trees would actually be removed or affected. Project construction will require issuance of a tree removal permit. Staff Comments: The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion. Maior Issues: The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this project: 1. The Trails Advisory Committee recommended that the Design Review Committee review the project's Wall and Fence Plan. Though the project will construct custom lots, the Trails Advisory Committee believed that design continuity and consistency of the walls and fences within the proposed subdivision was important and necessary. The proposed Wall and • Fence Plan shows the following: (a) wrought iron fencing will be provided along the northern boundary (along Vista Grove Street), (b) perimeter walls will be slump block with pilasters and flat caps, and (c) interior lot and trail walls will be combination concrete base (approximately 2 to 3 feet) topped with wrought iron fence (approximately 4 to 5 feet). No wood fencing is proposed. DRC COMMENTS SUBTT 16320-ACI GROUP September 2, 2003 • Page 2 Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the proposed project. Design Review Committee Action: Members Present: Staff Planner: Duane Morita I 1 LJ C~ DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS • 8:10 p.m. Emily Wimer September 2, 2003 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DESIGN REVIEW DRC2002-001023 - STOR-N-LOCK PARTNERS -A request to construct a 71,664 square foot self storage facility located on 4.21 acres of land on the southwest corner of Arrow Route and White Oak Avenue in the General Industrial District, Subarea 8 - APN: 0209-145-01. Design Parameters: The project is abutting an existing industrial site to the south by an existing industrial complex and to the west by a parking lot. The proposal is for two self-storage buildings totaling 68,457 square feet, a management office of 1,470 square feet, and an upper level manager's residence of approximately 1,737 square feet. There is one driveway on each street frontage, which is shared with the existing industrial building to the south. The project incorporates pedestrian access and walkways on both streets with a combination of berms and low walls for retaining purposes. The site contains numerous mature trees, some of which are proposed for removal; however, the majority of existing trees within the streetscape setbacks will be saved. The main elevation from W hite Oak Avenue incorporates materials and decorative elements such as a decorative glazing system on the second story portion of the building, pillars, and decorative file accents. Reveal lines, recessed wall planes, cornice trim and file accents are incorporated in the 360-degree architecture. Staff Comments: The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion. • Maior issues: The following broad design issues will be the focus of the Committee discussion regarding this project: There are no major issues. The applicant has worked diligently with staff to resolve any major issues. Secondary Issues: Once all of the major issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues: 1. Metal Trellis -The last public storage project, one block to the west on Arrow Route, to use metal trellis along the perimeter wall suffered graffiti. Vandals climbed up trellis. Applicant should explore with staff other solutions. 2. Landscaping -Utilize the principles of Xeriscape to conserve water, such as reducing the turf area by introducing river rock cobble fields along street frontages. 3. The number of signs shown on Elevations exceeds the maximum 3 signs allowed. The Sign Ordinance allows a maximum of 2 wall signs, plus one monument sign per street frontage, with a combination of wall and monument signs not to exceed 3 total. 4. Provide a decorative drive with the primary entry on White Oak Avenue to match the Arrow Route entry. The stamped and colored concrete shall extend through the shared driveway access. The developer shall work with the adjoining property owner to allow decorative paving. • Policy issues: Downspouts for the building shall be located in the loading/ unloading area only and should not be seen from public view. DRC COMMENTS DRC2002-01023 = STOR-N-LOCK September 2, 2003 • Page 2 Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Committee review the project and recommend approval to the Planning Commission. Design Review Committee Action: Members Present: Staff Planner: Emily Wimer •