The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2010/07/21 - Agenda Packet10500 Civic Center Drive 4 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730-3801 City Office: (909) 477-2700 AGENDAS REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT BOARDS CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETINGS 15t and 3'd Wednesdays ~ 7:00 P.M. JULY 21, 2010 Mr.~~~~rHs MAYO R MAYOR PRO TEM COUNCIL MEMBERS Donald J. Kurth, M.D. L. Dennis Michael Rex Gutierrez Sam Spagnolo Diane Williams CITY MANAGER CITY ATTORNEY CITY CLERK Jack Lam, AICP James L. Markman Janice C. Reynolds ORDER OF BUSINESS CLOSED SESSION Tapia Conference Room............ 5:00 P.M. REGULAR MEETING Council Chambers ........................ 7:00 P.M. INFORMATION FOR THE PUBLIC ~NCHO C,UCAMONGA TO ADDRESS THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, FIRE BOARD AND CITY COUNCIL The Agency, Fire Board and City Council encourage free expression of all points of view. To allow all persons to speak, given the length of the Agenda, please keep your remarks brief. If others have already expressed your position, you may simply indicate that you agree with a previous speaker. If appropriate, a spokesperson may present the views of your entire group. To encourage all views and promote courtesy to others, the audience should refrain from clapping, booing or shouts of approval or disagreement from the audience. The public may address the Agency, Fire Board or City Council by filling out a speaker card and submitting it to the City Clerk. The speaker cards are located on the wall at the back of the Chambers, at the front desk behind the staff table and at the City Clerk's desk. During "Public Communications," your name will be called to speak on any item listed or not listed on the agenda in the order in which it was received. If as part of your presentation, you would like to display audio or visual material, please see the City Clerk before the meeting commences. If you are present to speak on an "Advertised Public Hearing" item, your name will be called when that item is being discussed. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by the Chair, depending upon the number of individuals desiring to speak. The public communications period will not exceed one hour prior to the commencement of the business portion of the agenda. During this one hour period, all those who wish to speak on a topic contained in the business portion of the agenda will be given priority, and no further speaker cards for these business items (with the exception of public hearing items) will be accepted once the business portion of the agenda commences. Any other public communications which have not concluded during this one hour period may resume after the regular business portion of the agenda has been completed. Any handouts for the Agency, Fire Board or City Council should be given to the City Clerk for distribution AGENDA BACK-UP MATERIALS Staff reports and back-up materials for agenda items are available for review at the City Clerk's counter, Public Library and on the City's website. A complete copy of the agenda is also available at the desk located behind the staff table during the Council meeting. LIVE BROADCAST Agency, Fire Board and Council meetings are broadcast live on Channel 3 for those with cable television access. Meetings are rebroadcast on the second and fourth Wednesdays of each month at 11:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m. The City has added the option for customers without cable access to view the meetings "on-demand" from their computers. The added feature of "Streaming Video On Demand" is available on the City's website at www.ci.rancho- cucamonga.ca.uslwhatsnew.htm for those with Hi-bandwidth (DSUCable Modem) or Low-bandwidth (Dial-up) Internet service. The Agency, Fire Board and City Council meets regularly on the first and third Wednesday of the month at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers located at 10500 Civic Center Drive. Members of the City Council also sit as the Redevelopment Agency and the Fire District Board. Copies of the agendas and minutes can be found at http:l/www.ci.rancho-cucamonga.ca.us If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk's office at (909) 477-2700. Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired. Please turn off all cellular phones and pagers while the meeting is in session. REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, _ FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AND CITY COUNCIL AGENDA R"r'°"° JULY 21, 2010 CUCAMONGA 1 A. 5:00 P.M. -CLOSED SESSION CALL TO ORDER - TAPIA ROOM A1. Roll Call: Mayor Kurth Mayor Pro Tem Michael Councilmembers Gutierrez, Spagnolo and Williams CLOSED SESSION CALLED TO ORDER AS THE CITY COUNCIL. B. ANNOUNCEMENT OF CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S~ C. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS ON CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S) D. CONDUCT OF CLOSED SESSION D1. LABOR NEGOTIATIONS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54954.2 TO GIVE JOHN GILLISON, ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER, DIRECTION IN REGARDS TO THE MEET AND CONFER PROCESS -City E. CITY MANAGER ANNOUNCEMENTS F. RECESS CLOSED SESSION TO RECESS TO THE REGULAR REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AND FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT MEETINGS AT 7:00 P.M. IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS AT CITY HALL, LOCATED AT 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA. REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, _ FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AND CITY COUNCIL AGENDA R`te''°"° JULY 21, 2010 CucnMONCe 2 G. REGULAR MEETING CALL To ORDER - 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS THE REGULAR MEETINGS OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AND CITY COUNCIL WILL BE CALLED TO ORDER. IT IS THE INTENT TO CONCLUDE THE MEETINGS BY 10:00 P.M., UNLESS EXTENDED BY CONCURRENCE OF THE AGENCY, FIRE BOARD AND COUNCIL. G1. Pledge of Allegiance G2. Roll Call: Mayor Kurth Mayor Pro Tem Michael Councilmembers Gutierrez, Spagnolo and Williams H. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS H1. Announcement of Upcoming National Night Out on August 3, 2010. I. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS This is the time and place for the general public to address the Redevelopment Agency, Fire Protection District and City Council on any item listed or not listed on the agenda. State law prohibits the Agency, Fire Board, or City Council from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Agency, Fire Board, or City Council may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by the Chair, depending upon the number of individuals desiring to speak. All communications are to be addressed directly to the Agency, Fire Board or City Council, not to the members of the audience. This is a professional business meeting and courtesy and decorum are expected. Please refrain from any debate between audience and speaker, making loud noises, or engaging in any activity which might be disruptive to the decorum of the meeting. The public communications period will not exceed one hour prior to the commencement of the business portion of the agenda. During this one hour period, all those who wish to speak on a topic contained in the business portion of the agenda will be given priority, and no further speaker cards for these business items (with the exception of public hearing items) will be accepted once the business portion of the agenda commences. Any other public communications which have not concluded during this one hour period may resume after the regular business portion of the agenda has been completed. REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, _ FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AND CITY COUNCIL AGENDA R""°"° JULY 21, 2010 G'UCAMONGA 3 J. CONSENT CALENDAR -REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non-controversial. They will be acted upon by the Agency at one time without discussion. Any item may be removed by an Agencymember for discussion. J1. Approval of Minutes: June 30, 2010 (Special Meeting -Budget Update) July 7, 2010 (Regular Meeting) 1 J2. Approval of Check Register dated June 30 through July 13, 2010, for the total amount of $635, 074.45. J3. Approve to receive and file current Investment Schedule as of June 30, 2010. 2 J4. Approval to authorize the advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bids" for the construction of City 2U of Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center Electrical Service Replacement and Standby Generator Upgrade to be funded from Account Nos. 2513801-5603 and 2513801- 5650/1715513-0. 22 RESOLUTION NO. RA 10-016 A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE "CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER ELECTRICAL SERVICE REPLACEMENT AND STANDBY GENERATOR UPGRADE" IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS J5. Number not used. J6. Approval to modify the Victoria Gardens Promissory Note, allowing FC Victoria Gardens-C, 2g Inc. and LC Cucamonga Commercial, Inc., to transfer all obligations of the note to RM Member, LLC. J7. Approval to accept the Haven Avenue Pavement Rehabilitation from 4th Street to Foothill Boulevard, Contract No. RA10-003 as complete, release the bonds, accept a Maintenance 30 Bond, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and approve the final contract amount of $1,221,294.89. 33 RESOLUTION NO. RA 10-017 A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE HAVEN AVENUE PAVEMENT REHABILITATION FROM 4TH STREET TO FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, CONTRACT NO. RA10-003 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, _ FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AND CITY COUNCIL AGENDA R"''1OFO JULY 21, 2010 CUCAMONGA 4 K. CONSENT CALENDAR -FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non-controversial. They will be acted upon by the Fire Board at one time without discussion. Any item may be removed by a Boardmember for discussion. K1. Approval of Minutes: June 30, 2010 (Special Meeting -Budget Update) July 7, 2010 (Regular Meeting) K2. Approval of Check Register dated June 30 through July 13, 2010, for the total amount of 34 $106,608.60. K3. Approval to receive and file current Investment Schedule as of June 30, 2010. 37 K4. Number not used. K5. Approval to authorize Emcor Service/Mesa Energy Systems, Inc. (Emcor Service) to 44 continue as the single source service provider and installer for HVAC/Control work and related energy management systems for City and Fire District facilities at the same rates as fiscal year 2009/2010 in the amount of $215,767 for City facilities and $22,640 for Fire District facilities for annual maintenance; approve extra repair work for City facilities not to exceed $200,000; and perform indoor air quality modifications as needed at City-wide facilities not to exceed $10,000; to be funded from Account Nos. 1001312-5304, 1025001- 5304, 1700201-5304, 3281511-5300, 3281512-5300, 3281513-5300, 3281514-5300, 3281515-5300, 3281527-5300 and 3283516-5300. L. CONSENT CALENDAR -CITY COUNCIL The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non-controversial. They will be acted upon by the Council at one time without discussion. Any item may be removed by a Councilmember for discussion. L1. Approval of Minutes: June 30, 2010 (Special Meeting -Budget Update) July 7, 2010 (Regular Meeting) L2. Approval of Check Register dated June 30 through July 13, 2010, and payroll ending July 45 13, 2010, for the total amount of $6,365,394.68. 77 L3. Approval to receive and file current Investment Schedule as of June 30, 2010. 88 L4. Approval of Community Services Update Report. L5. Approval of an Amendment No. 7 to the Amended and Restated Lease Agreement between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and Rancho Baseball, LLC (CO 92-064), relating 100 to stadium security reimbursement. L6. Approval to authorize the Mayor to sign Certificate of Compliance No. 680 for adjustment of City/Developer property line at no cost to the City, located at the northwest corner of Long 108 Meadow Drive and Vctoria Park Lane, submitted by Cucamonga 220, L.P., a Limited Partnership. REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, _ FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AND CITY COUNCIL AGENDA 5 R~°"° JULY 21, 2010 ~;uc,u.~oNCn L7. Approval to authorize Emcor Service/Mesa Energy Systems, Inc. (Emcor Service) to 110 continue as the single source service provider and installer for HVAC/Control work and related energy management systems for City and Fire District facilities at the same rates as fiscal year 2009/2010 in the amount of $215,767 for City facilities and $22,640 for Fire District facilities for annual maintenance; approve extra repair work for City facilities not to exceed $200,000; and perform indoor air quality modifcations as needed at City-wide facilities not to exceed $10,000; to be funded from Account Nos. 1001312-5304, 1025001- 5304, 1700201-5304, 3281511-5300, 3281512-5300, 3281513-5300, 3281514-5300, 3281515-5300,3281527-5300 and 3283516-5300. L8. Approval of Addendum for the use of City-owned conduit with NextG Networks of 111 California, Inc., a Delaware Corporation for rental of City-owned conduit. L9. Approval to award a contract to All City Management Services, Inc. (CO 10-089) as a 113 single source provider for Professional Crossing Guard Services for the 2010/2011 fiscal year, with an option to renew for a one (1) year period up to a total of three (3) years upon review of and City agreement to any pricing changes, in the amount not to exceed $380,000 from Account No. 1001701-5300 (Contract Services). L10. Approval to accept the "Citywide Street Name Sign Replacement - FY 09/10," Contract No. 115 10-001, as complete, retain the Faithful Performance Bond as a Guarantee Bond; approve the Resolution authorizing the Public Works Services Director to file a Notice of Completion, release the Labor and Materials Bond six months after the recordation of said notice of completion, and approve the f nal contract amount of $62,354. 117 RESOLUTION NO. 10-124 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR "CITYWIDE STREET NAME SIGN REPLACEMENT - FY 09/10" AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK L11. Approval to accept Improvements, release the Faithful Performance cash deposit, accept a 118 Maintenance cash deposit and file a Notice of Completion for improvements for DRC2003- 00048, located at 13670 Victoria Street, submitted by Bruno Mancinelli Construction. RESOLUTION NO. 10-125 120 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR DRC2003-00048 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK L12. Approval to release the Faithful Performance Bond retained in lieu of a Maintenance 121 Guarantee Bond for Parcel Map 17594, located on the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Rochester Avenue, submitted by F & F, LLC. L13. Approval to accept the Haven Avenue Pavement Rehabilitation from 4'" Street to Foothill 123 Boulevard, Contract No. 10-021 as complete, release the bonds, accept a Maintenance Bond, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and approve the final contract amount of $1,221,294.89. REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, _ FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AND CITY COUNCIL AGENDA R"~"°"° JULY 21, 2010 CUCAMONGA 6 RESOLUTION NO. 10-126 126 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE HAVEN AVENUE PAVEMENT REHABILITATION FROM 4T" STREET TO FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, CONTRACT NO. 10-021 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK M. CONSENT ORDINANCES FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT The following Ordinances have had public hearings at the time of first reading. Second readings are expected to be routine and non-controversial. The Agency, Fire Board, or Council will act upon them at one time without discussion. The City Clerk will read the title. Any item can be removed for discussion by an Agencymember, Boardmember, or Councilmember. M1. CONSIDERATION OF THE SECOND READING OF AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING CILITIES 127 THE LEVY OF SPECIAL TAX IN THE MELLO-ROOS COMMUNITY FA DISTRICT NO. 85-1 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2010/2011 ORDINANCE NO. FD 49 (second reading) 128 AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE LEVY OF THE SPECIAL TAX IN MELLO-ROOS COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2010/2011 N. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT The following items have been advertised and/or posted as public hearings as required by law. The Chair will open the meeting to receive public testimony. N1. ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION MAKING DETERMINATIONS REGARDING THE 132 PROPOSED ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY (ALFONSO 8 KAY CARRILLO. OWNERS - APN 1062-321-35 -ANNEXATION NO 88-10-2) TO AN EXISTING COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT CALLING A SPECIAL ELECTION AND AUTHORIZING SUBMITTAL OF LEVY OF SPECIAL TAXES TO THE QUALIFIED ELECTORS REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, _ FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AND CITY COUNCIL AGENDA Rte''°H° JULY 21, 2010 C.UCAMONGA 7 RESOLUTION NO. FD 10-032 135 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, MAKING CERTAIN DETERMINATIONS REGARDING THE PROPOSED ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY (ANNEXATION NO. 88-10-2) TO AN EXISTING COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT (CFD 88-1) AND CALLING A SPECIAL ELECTION AND AUTHORIZING THE SUBMITTAL OF THE LEVY OF SPECIAL TAXES TO THE QUALIFIED ELECTORS OF SUCH TERRITORY O. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS CITY COUNCIL The following items have been advertised and/or posted as public hearings as required by law. The Mayor will open the meeting to receive public testimony. 01. CONSIDERATION TO APPROVE THE RESOLUTION CONFIRMING THE DIAGRAMS 142 AND ASSESSMENTS AND ORDERING THE LEVY AND COLLECTION OF ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS FOR LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO'S. 1. 2. 3A, 36, 5, 6, 7 8 9 AND 10 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2010-2011. NO INCREASE OF ASSESSMENT RATE IS PROPOSED 144 RESOLUTION NO. 10-127 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONFIRMING THE DIAGRAMS AND ASSESSMENTS AND ORDERING THE LEVY AND COLLECTION OF THE ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS WITHIN LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS NO'S. 1, 2, 3A, 36, AND 5 THROUGH 10, INCLUSIVE, FOR FISCAL YEAR 2010-2011 02. CONSIDERATION TO APPROVE THE RESOLUTION CONFIRMING THE DIAGRAM 378 AND ASSESSMENT AND ORDERING FOR THE LEVY AND COLLECTION OF THE ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS WITHIN THE PARK AND RECREATION IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. PD-85 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2010-2011. NO INCREASE OF ASSESSMENT RATE IS PROPOSED RESOLUTION NO. 10-128 379 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN THE PARK AND RECREATION IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. PD-85 (HERITAGE AND RED HILL COMMUNITY PARKS) FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2010/2011 PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AND CITY COUNCIL AGENDA R~°"° JULY 21, 2010 CUCAMONGA 8 03. CONSIDERATION TO APPROVE THE RESOLUTION CONFIRMING THE DIAGRAMS 393 AND ASSESSMENTS AND ORDERING THE LEVY AND COLLECTION OF ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS WITHIN STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO'S. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 6 7 AND 8 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2010-2011. NO INCREASE OF ASSESSMENT RATE IS PROPOSED 395 RESOLUTION NO. 10-129 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONFIRMING THE DIAGRAMS AND THE ASSESSMENTS AND ORDERING THE LEVY AND COLLECTION OF THE ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS WITHIN STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS NO'S. 1 THROUGH 8, INCLUSIVE, FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2010-2011 P. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS The following items have no legal publication or posting requirements. P1. ACKNOWLEDGING THE RECEIPT OF AN ESRI 2010 SPECIAL ACHIEVEMENTS IN GIS AWARD FOR THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENTERPRISE GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM (oral report) P2. PRESENTATION OF AMERICAN SOCIETY CIVIL ENGINEERS AWARD FOR THE HAVEN AVENUE GRADE SEPARATION PROJECT (oral presentation) Q. COUNCIL BUSINESS The following items have been requested by the City Council for discussion. 01. COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS (Comments to be limited to three minutes per Councilmember.) R. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING S. ADJOURNMENT I, Debra L. McKay, Assistant City Clerk/Records Manager, of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on July 15, 2010, seventy-two (72) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive. June 30, 2010 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL MINUTES REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MINUTES FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT MINUTES SPECIAL MEETING A. CALL TO ORDER A special meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga City Council, Redevelopment Agency and Fire Protection District was held on Wednesday, June 30, 2010, in the Tri-Communities Room at the Civic Center located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Mayor/Chairman/President Donald J. Kurth called the meeting to order at 4:05 p.m. Present were Councilmembers/Agencymembers/Boardmembers: Sam Spagnolo, Diane Williams (arrived at 4:16 p.m.), Mayor Pro TemNice ChairmanNice President L. Dennis Michael and Mayor/Chairman/President Donald J. Kurth. Councilmember/Agencymember/Boardmember Rex Gutierrez was absent. Also present were: Jack Lam, City Manager/Executive Director; John Gillison, Assistant City Manager; Linda Daniels, Deputy City Manager/Community and Economic Development; James Troyer, Planning Director; Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director; Trang Huynh, Building and Safety Official; Robert Karatsu, Library Director; Bill Wittkopf, Public Works Services Director; Chris Paxton, Human Resources Director; Chief Jce Cusimano, Rancho Cucamonga Police Department; Chief Mike Bell, Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District; Joe Pulcinella, Animal Services Director; Jim Frost, City Treasurer and Debra L. McKay, Assistant City Clerk/Records Manager. .,.,., B. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS No communication was made from the public. I~ C. CONSENT CALENDAR -CITY COUNCIL ~ The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non-controversial. They will be acted upon by the City Council at one time without discussion. Any item may be removed by a Councilmember for discussion. C1. AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD A SINGLE SOURCE CONTRACT TO EMCOR SERVICE FOR EMERGENCY PURCHASE AND INSTALLATION OF TWO 12-TON AIR CONDITIONING UNITS FOR THE CITY HALL SERVER ROOM IN THE AMOUNT OF $124,890 ($118,290 FOR THE UNITS PLUS $6,600 FORA 5 YEAR EXTENDED WARRANTY) AND AUTHORIZATION TO TRANSFER $124,890 FROM ACCOUNT NUMBER 1025001-5417 INTO ACCOUNT NUMBERS 1025001-5602 ($118,290) AND 1025001-5300 ($6,600) IF NECESSARY. MOTION: Moved by Michael, seconded by Spagnolo, to approve the staff recommendation in the staff report contained within the Consent Calendar. Motion carried 3-0 (Council members Gutierrez and Williams absent). Special City Council/Redevelopment Agency/Fire Protection District Meeting June 30, 2010 -Page 1 of 3 D. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS -CITY COUNCIL D1. CONSIDERATION OF LATEST BUDGET INFORMATION AND RECOMMENDATIONS • CURRENT FINANCIAL DATA AND TRENDS • RECAP OF BUDGETARY ACTION • SHERIFF CONTRACT RECOMMENDATIONS • CONTINGENCY PLANNING FOR ADDITIONAL RDA TAKEAWAYS • CONTINGENCY PLANNING FOR FUTURE MEDICAL INSURANCE AND PERS CHANGES A staff report was presented by Jack Lam, City Manager/Executive Director. Mr. Lam presented a summary of the City General Fund, Library Services and Fire Protection District budgets. He reported that there is currently an 11.5% vacancy rate for full time positions, which equates to 59 unfunded positions. Mr. Lam ident'fiied previous budget reductions that have been made in order to preserve basic services. Lastly, he highlighted the three budget triggers that he had previously ident~ed which could negatively impact the Adopted Budget. These were as follows: If revenues do not bottom out or improve, if the State seizes additional money, or if labor does not relieve the County of the additional burden of salary increases. Today's meeting is the result of the occurrence of the third trigger point. Sales tax gross receipts by quarter were discussed, as well as property tax collections. In response to Councilmember Spagnolo, the decline in property tax was discussed. Mr. Lam indicated that the decline was due to reassessments and delinquencies. In response to Councilmember Williams, Mr. Gillison stated that property owners have up to five years to pay their property tax and addressed how delinquencies are paid to the City. Also presented was an update on the unemployment rate Mr. Lam discussed the State budget and possible additional impacts to the City. RDA take-sways were highlighted and it was reported that $32,108,990 was paid in FY 2009110. The current estimated take-away for FY 2010/11 is $6,604,520 and it is possible that another $6-7 million in redevelopment funds could occur. It was noted that the loss of this funding would deplete the construction funding for the Arrow and I-15 off ramp project. In response to Mayor Pro Tem Michael, Linda Daniels noted that the Agency added money to the bond funding and confirmed that bond funding could not be used to pay the State. In response to Mayor Kurth, Mr. Lam confirmed that RDA money paid to the State will not be reimbursed to the Agency. In response to Mayor Pro Tem Michael, the impact to the RDA Fire Fund was discussed. Bonds would not be sold, but Mrs. Daniels indicated that if this money were taken away, the District would need to wait to reconstruct Station 172 until there was sufficient revenue in the fund. The Sheriffs contract was discussed, with Mr. Lam indicating that the recent labor decision to adhere to the labor contract has resulted in an impact of $1,449,857. The San Bernardino County Sheriffs Department is making changes to improve efficiency, including reducing overtime and on-call, alternative shift scheduling and negotiating additional cost-saving measures. Shift changes could save between 20 - 30%. Mr. Lam recommended that the City Council direct the Police Chief to manage resources to maintain street level services while staying within the adopted budget. Also, he recommended appropriating up to $150,000 from the Law Enforcement Reserve to facilitate any shift transitions necessary to stay within the adopted budget. There was discussion of the Law Enforcement Reserve. Special City Council/Redevelopment Agency/Fire Protection District Meeting June 30, 2010 -Page 2 of 3 In response to Councilmember Spagnolo, Mr. Lam indicated that the alternate shift scheduling only affects the sworn officers but noted that non-sworn personnel would also be affected by the cost-saving measures. In response to Mayor Prc Tem Michael, Mr. Lam confirmed that it may take longer for things to get done but indicated that the changes would not affect street level services. Mr. Lam presented an update to the City Council on medical health premiums. The Fire District is anticipating that the CaIPERS health premiums will rise an average of 9.1% by January, 2011. The City should expect a similar potential increase (6-11%) from City providers. To address this, he proposed a new insurance coverage period, approval to broker an RFP in the summer of 2010, approval to form an Employee Medical Benefits Committee to discuss ways to reduce medical insurance costs. These actions are expected to result in re-pricing of medical insurance and new contracts by January, 2011. Also discussed was the PERS Pension Rates, with Mr. Lam recommending the establishment of a Fire District PERS reserve and research of Pension Bonds. In closing, Mr. Lam summarized the recommendations, as follows: • Continue attrition management • Continue restructuringlreorganization • Direct Police Chief to manage resources to maintain street level services while staying within the adopted budget. • Appropriate up tc $150,000 from Law Enforcement reserves as needed to facilitate any staff or shift transitions necessary to stay within adopted budget. • Complete contingency planning and revision of implementation schedules for additional RDA take- aways by the State in FY2010-11. • Form Employee Medical Benefits Committee • Prepare Broker RFP for 2010 • Study Pension Bonds and continue preparation for PERS increases • Strengthen funding for PERS reserves In response to Mayor Pro Tem Michael, Mr. Lam addressed the formation of the Employee Medical Benefits Committee. Jack Lam also addressed the recommendation to strengthen funding in the reserves. John Gillison indicated that this would not be done in every fund, just the significant ones. In response to Mayor Pro Tem Michael, Mr. Lam confirmed that he would report back to the City Council 'rf the other trigger points were reached. The City Council members expressed their support of the recommendations and their appreciation of the City Manager and staff. MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by Michael, to approve the staff recommendations listed above. Motion carried 4-0. (Council member Gutierrez absent). ...... E. ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 4:58 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Debra L. McKay, MMC Assistant City Clerk/Records Manager Approved: ""' Special City CouncillRedevelopment Agency/Fire Protection District Meeting June 30, 2010 -Page 3 of 3 July 7, 2010 RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, FIRE DISTRICT AND CITY COUNCIL CLOSED SESSION MINUTES A. CALL TO ORDER The Rancho Cucamonga City Council held a closed session on Wednesday, July 7, 2010, in the Tapia Room of the Civic Center located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, Cal'rfornia. The meeting was called to order at 5:00 p.m. by Chairman/President/Mayor Donald J. Kurth. Present were Councilmembers: Rex Gutierrez, Diane Williams, Sam Spagnolo, Mayor Pro Tem L. Dennis Michael and Mayor Donald J. Kurth. Also present were: Jack Lam, City Manager; John Gillison, Assistant City Manager and James Markman, City Attorney. B. ANNOUNCEMENT OF CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S) Mayor Donald J. Kurth announced the closed session item: ~ rnr.i~~ooniro ~nnru oono~oTV ~ionnn nTnoe o0o rnvooninn~niT rnn~ mrTinni D2. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL REGARDING POTENTIAL LITIGATION PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.9(A) FOR CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA'S OBLIGATION UNDER CONTRACT NUMBER CO 06-179 TO SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON -CITY ~~ C. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS ON CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S) ~~ No one was present to comment on the closed session item. D. CONDUCT OF CLOSED SESSION Closed session began at 5:00 p.m. E. CITY MANAGER ANNOUNCEMENTS No announcements were made. F. RECESS The closed session adjourned at 6:45 p.m. with no action taken. G. REGULAR MEETING CALL TO ORDER - 7:00 P.M. Redevelopment Agency, Fire Protection DisVict, City Council Minutes July 7, 2010 -Page 1 of 14 COUNCIL CHAMBERS The meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency, Fire Protection District, and City Council reconvened in the Council Chambers of the Civic Center located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, Calirfornia. Chairman/PresidenUMayor Donald J. Kurth called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. Present were Agencymembers/Boardmembers/Councilmembers: Rex Gutierrez, Diane Williams, Sam Spagnolo, Vice ChairmanNice PresidenUMayor Pro Tem L. Dennis Michael and ChairmanlPresidenUMayor Donald J. Kurth. Also present were: Jack Lam, City Manager; James Markman, City Attorney; John Gillison, Assistant City Manager; Linda Daniels, Deputy City Manager/Economic and Community Development; Joe Cusimano, Police Chief; Robert Karatsu, Library Director; James Troyer, Planning Director; Bill Wittkopf, Public Works Director; Mark Steuer, Engineering Director; Trang Huynh, Building 8 Safety Official; Debra McKay, Records Manager/Assistant City Clerk and Kathy Scott, Assistant City Clerk. H. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS H1. Presentation of a check from Southern California Edison (SCE) to Dee MaVeyek for the Community Garden Project. Christian Nelson, Southern California Edison's Regional Representative presented a check to Dee Matreyek for the Community Garden Project. I. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS 11. Janet Ryerson, Vice Chair of the Park and Recreation Commission, updated the Ciry Council and the audience on the planning and design of the Veterans and Armed Services area at Central Park. 12. Jerie Lee expressed a concern with funds being expended to hold another election for Landscaping Maintenance District 6. She indicated that staff did not explain fully to the residents in these districts that 'rf the elections failed, the landscaping would suffer; that the assessment was negotiable and that work crews would be used. She urged the City Council to request a complete report and to pay more attention to this matter. 13. Jim Fettig commented on the flag retirement ceremony last month and thanked Mayor Kurth and Councilmember Spagnolo for attending. He indicated that the Rancho Cucamonga VFW has been participating in the discussions regarding the Veterans and Armed Services area and thanked the Council for their support of this project. 14. John Lyons expressed his condolences to the Lewis family on the passing of David Lewis. He suggested that bulletin boards be placed along Day Creek. Etiwanda Avenue etc., in conjunction with the trail system listing the names, distance and grade to various restaurants in the City. Mr. Lyons was encouraged that the Chinese believe that we are in the midst of a slow recovery period not a double dip recession. He spoke in support of Landscape Maintenance Districts and thanked the Council for the landscaping around the entrance to Victoria Gardens. I5. Bill Hanlon stated that there is a lack of leadership in the City. He noted that the regulations regarding political signs are not being followed by elected officials. Mr. Hanlon attended a parade in an adjacent City where sparklers were allowed and noted to the contrary, Rancho Cucamonga intimidated people with signs that fireworks were illegal. He noted that it took five months of complaining for work to be started on a veteran's memorial. Mr. Hanlon expressed concerns with the lack of funding for this project, noting instead that the City will be paying $29,000 to design a bocce court. Redevelopment Agency, Fire Protection District, City Council Minutes July 7, 2010 -Page 2 of 14 16. Jim Moffatt expressed a concern with the lack of City funding for the Veterans and Armed Services area being planned at Central Park. He noted that when the Council wanted to ban smoking at ATMs, they found $6,000 for signs. Also, Mr. Moffatt addressed a previous incident where his granddaughter was thrown out of a park and noted that it is ridiculous to pay $125 per night to use a field for practice. 17. Mark Samet, representing LaRouche Political Action Committee, encouraged the City Council to endorse the re-imposition of the Constitutional Glass-Steagall principal. J. CONSENT CALENDAR-REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non-controversial. They will be acted upon by the Agency at one time without discussion. Any item may be removed by an Agencymember for discussion. J1. Approval of Minutes: June 16, 2010 (Regular Meeting) J2. Approval of Check Register dated June 9 through June 29, 2010, for the total amount of $1,858,412.53. J3. Approval of Amendment to the Loan Agreement and Trust Agreement secured by the Housing Pledge Agreement (RA 95-008) between Northtown Housing Development Corporation and the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency. J4. Approval of an extension to Contract No. 10-022 in an amount not to exceed $136,590 to Pendleton Partners, Inc., and approve contract Change Order No. 1 for the professional consulting services for the Fire District PlanningNision Process contract, to be funded from Account No. 2505801-5300. MOTION: Moved by Spagnolo, seconded by Williams, to approve the staff recommendations in the staff reports. Motion carried 5-0. K. CONSENT CALENDAR -FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non-controversial. They will be acted upon by the Fire Board at one time without discussion. Any item may be removed by a Boardmember for discussion. K1. Approval of Minutes: June 16, 2010 (Regular Meeting) K2. Approval of Check Register dated June 9 through June 29, 2010, for the total amount of $528,271.95. MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by Michael, to approve the staff recommendations in the staff reports contained within the Consent Calendar. Motion carried 5-0. L. CONSENT CALENDAR- CITY COUNCIL The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non-controversial. They will be acted upon by the Council at one time without discussion. Any item may be removed by a Councilmember for discussion. Redevelopment Agency, Fire Protection District, City Council Minutes July 7, 2010 -Page 3 of 14 L1. Approval of Minutes: June 16, 2010 (Regular Meeting) L2. Approval of Check Register dated June 9 through June 29, 2010, and payroll ending June 29, 2010, for the total amount of $4,697,812.93. L3. Approval to accept grant revenue in the amount of $41,136 from the United States Department of Justice 2009/10 Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant into Acct. No. 13540000- 4740 (Grand Income) for use by the Police Department to off-set overtime costs to conduct criminal investigations and to continue Community Crime Prevention Programs. L4. Approval to disburse $40,000 to Chaffey Joint Union High School District from State Asset Seizure 15% fund account #1196000-4740 for the C.A.N.I.N.E. program for narcotics detection services and educational programs. REMOVED FOR DISCUSSION BY MAYOR PRO TEM MICHAEL. L5. Approval of a contract renewal (CO 07-189) on a month-to-month basis with WSA Security, Inc., for security guard services at various City facilities for fiscal year 2010-2011, in an annual amount of $305,542 ($290,542 annual amount plus $15,000 emergency service) far fiscal year 2010-2011 with no increase in hourly rate for regular/emergency service, to be funded from Account Numbers 1001312-5304, 1133303-5304, 1700201-5304, and 1290606-5300 for fiscal year 2010-11. L6. Approval of a contract renewal (CO 06-180) on a month-to-month basis with ABM Janitorial Services for the cleaning of City-wide facilities in the amount of $586,662 ($516,662 annual contract plus $20,000 extra work allowance and $50,000 in supplies) for fiscal year 2010-2011 with no increase from fiscal year 2009-2010 rates, to be funded from Account Numbers 1 001 31 2-5304 (Contract Services, Facilities) and 1700201-5304 (Contract Services, Facilities). L7. Approval of a Resolution adopting a Memorandum of Understanding (CO 10-075) between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the San Bernardino Public Employees Association for fiscal year2010-11. RESOLUTION NO. 10-123 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND THE SAN BERNARDINO PUBLIC EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION RELATIVE TO WAGES, BENEFITS AND OTHER TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF EMPLOYMENT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2010-11 L8. Approval of a Resolution of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, approving the application for used oil payment program funds from the California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery. RESOLUTION NO. 10-101 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE APPLICATION FOR USED OIL PAYMENT PROGRAM FUNDS FROM THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF RESOURCES RECYCLING AND RECOVERY L9. Approval of Professional Services Agreement with Aufbau Corporation (CO 10-076), to provide specialized annual inspections and engineering support services for FY 2010/2011, with an option to renew annually up to an additional two years after review of fees and mutual agreement of both parties, for proposed capital improvement projects throughout the City as approved in the budget, to be funded from various individual project accounts. Redevelopment Agency, Fire Protection District, City Council Minutes July 7, 2010 -Page 4 of 14 L10. Approval to accept the Banyan Street Community Trail and Wilson Avenue Community Trail, Contract No. 10-005 as complete, release the bonds, accept a Maintenance Bond, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion, and approve the final contract amount of $63,181.00. RESOLUTION NO. 10-102 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE BANYAN STREET COMMUNITY TRAIL AND WILSON AVENUE COMMUNITY TRAIL, CONTRACT NO. 10-005 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK L11. Approval of Professional Services Agreements with Ninyo & Moore (CO 10-077), Salem Engineering Group, Inc (CO 10-078), and Leighton Consulting, Inc. (CO 10-079) to provide annual soils and materials testing services for FY 2010/2011, with an option to renew annually up to an additional two years after review of fees and mutual agreement of bath parties, far proposed capital improvement projects throughout the City as approved in the budget, to be funded from various individual project accounts. L12. Approval to release the Maintenance Guarantee cash deposit for DRC2003-01085, located on the south side of 7~" Street at the cul-de-sac terminus east of Archibald Avenue, submitted by Scheu Management Corporation. L13. Approval of Professional Services Agreements with Dan Guerra 6 Associates (CO 10-080), Baseline Surveying (CO 10-081), Dawson Surveying, Inc. (CO 10-082), L.E.H. 8 Associates (CO 10-083) and Westland Group, Inc. (CO 10-084), to provide annual survey services for FY 2010/2011, with an option to renew annually up to an additional two years after review of fees and mutual agreement of both parties, for proposed capital improvement projects throughout the City as approved in the budget, to be funded from various individual project accounts. L14. Approval to accept Improvements, release the Faithful Performance Bond, accept a Maintenance Bond and file a Notice of Completion for improvements for DRC2005-00327, located on the east side of Baker Avenue, between Arrow Route and Ninth Street, submitted by Chinese Christian Family Church, Inland Valley. RESOLUTION NO. 10-103 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR DRC2005-00327 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK L15. Approval to release the Maintenance Guarantee Bond for DRC2005-00703, located at 8578 Pecan Avenue, submitted by Gordon Trucking, Inc. L16. Approval to release the Faithful Performance Bond for Improvements for Parcel Map 16038, located on the west side of Klusman Avenue, north of Diamond Avenue, submitted by Klusman, LLC. L17. Approval to release the Maintenance Guarantee Bond for Tract 16716, located on the east side of Etiwanda Avenue between Etiwanda Intermediate Middle School and Etiwanda Railway Station, submitted by Monte San Savino, LLC. L18. Approval to accept Improvements, release the Faithful Performance Bond, accept a Maintenance cash deposit and file a Notice of Completion for improvements for Tract 17487 and 17840, located at the south side of Church Street, east of Day Creek Boulevard, submitted by Shea Homes, LP. Redevelopment Agency, Fire Protection District, City Council Minutes July 7, 2010 -Page 5 of 14 RESOLUTION NO. 10-104 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 17487 AND 17840 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK Mayor Pro Tem Michael removed Item L4. for discussion. MOTION: Moved by Spagnolo, seconded by Williams, to approve the remaining staff recommendations in the staff reports. Motion carried 5-0. L4. Approval to disburse $40,000 to Chaffey Joint Union High School District from State Asset Seizure 15% fund account #1196000-4740 for the C.A.N.I.N.E. program for narcotics detection services and educational programs. REMOVED FOR DISCUSSION BY MAYOR PRO TEM MICHAEL. Maycr Pro Tem Michael indicated that Chief Cusimano made a presentation at the last meeting on the C.A.N.I.N.E. program and was very pleased that this program will be continuing. MOTION: Moved by Michael, seconded by Williams, to approve the staff recommendation in the staff report. Motion carried 5-0. M. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT i The following items have been advertised and/or posted as public hearings as required by law. The Chair will open the meeting to receive public testimony. M1. CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE FIRE DISTRICT'S RESOLUTION NO. FD 10-028 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, FIXING A FINAL BUDGET FOR THE FISCAL YEAR JULY 1, 2010 THROUGH JUNE 30, 2011 Jack Lam, City Manager/Secretary, presented the staff report. President Kurth opened the public hearing. With no one wishing to speak, President Kurth closed the public hearing. MOTION: Moved by Michael, seconded by Gutierrez, to adopt Resolution No. FD 10-028. Motion carried 5-0. M2. ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION MAKING DETERMINATIONS REGARDING THE PROPOSED ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY (AMIN O. KHAN - APNS 0201-182-36. 37 8 38 - ANNEXATION NO. 88-10-1) TO AN EXISTING COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT. CALLING A SPECIAL ELECTION AND AUTHORIZING SUBMITTAL OF LEVY OF SPECIAL TAXES TO THE QUALIFIED ELECTORS. Redevelopment Agency, Fire Protection District, City Council Minutes July 7, 2010 -Page 6 of 14 RESOLUTION NO. FD 10-029 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, MAKING CERTAIN DETERMINATIONS REGARDING THE PROPOSED ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY (ANNEXATION NO. 88-10-1) TO AN EXISTING COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT (CFD 88-1) AND CALLING A SPECIAL ELECTION AND AUTHORIZING THE SUBMITTAL OF THE LEVY OF SPECIAL TAXES TO THE QUALIFIED ELECTORS OF SUCH TERRITORY President Kurth opened the public hearing. With nc one wishing to speak, President Kurth closed the public hearing. MOTION: Moved by Michael, seconded by Williams, to adopt Resolution No. FD 10-029. Motion carried 5-0. N. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS CITY COUNCIL The following items have been advertised andlor posted as public hearings as required by law. The Mayor will open the meeting to receive public testimony. N1. CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AMENDING ELECTRIC RATES. FEES. AND CHARGES PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS AND AUTHORITY OF CHAPTER 3.46 OF TITLE 3 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE. RESOLUTION NO. 10-105 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING ELECTRIC RATES, FEES, AND CHARGES PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS AND AUTHORITY OF CHAPTER 3.46 OF TITLE 3 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE Jack Lam, City Manager, presented the staff report In response to Councilmember Williams, Mr. Lam confinmed that the Utility's rates are adjusted periodically to reflect the rates charged by Southern Cal'rfornia Edison. Mayor Kurth opened the public hearing. With no one wishing to speak, Mayor Kurth closed the public hearing. MOTION: Moved by Michael, seconded by Gutierrez, to adopt Resolution No. 10-105. Motion carried 5-0. In response to Mr. Lam, Mr. Markman confirmed that there was no need to open a public hearing on N2 - N4. These items will be advertised for consideration on July 21, 2010. Redevelopment Agency, Fire Protection District, City Council Minutes July 7, 2010 -Page 7 of 14 N2. CONSIDERATION TO APPROVE THE RESOLUTION CONFIRMING THE DIAGRAMS AND ASSESSMENTS AND ORDERING THE LEVY AND COLLECTION OF ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS FOR LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1. 2, 3A. 36, 5, 6. 7. 8, 9 AND 10 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2010-2011. NO INCREASE OF ASSESSMENT RATE IS PROPOSED (DUE TO A TECHNICAL ERROR IN ADVERTISING, THIS ITEM WILL BE CONTINUED TO JULY 21, 2010. NO STAFF REPORT INCLUDED) N3. CONSIDERATION TO APPROVE THE RESOLUTION CONFIRMING THE DIAGRAM AND PROPOSED (DUE TO A TECHNICAL ERROR IN ADVERTISIN CONTINUED TO JULY 21, 2010. NO STAFF REPORT INCLUDED) N4. PROPOSED (DUE TO A TECHNICAL ERROR IN ADVERTISING, THIS ITEM WILL BE CONTINUED TO JULY 21, 2010. NO STAFF REPORT INCLUDED) O. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT The following items have no legal publication or posting requirements 01. AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE LEVY OF THE SPECIAL TAX IN MELLO-ROOS COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2010/11 02. CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING THE MAXIMUM TAX WHICH COULD BE LEVIED IN COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2010/11. (ITEMS 01 - 03 WERE CONSIDERED AT THE SAME TIME). RESOLUTION NO. FD 10-030 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING THE MAXIMUM SPECIAL TAX WHICH COULD BE LEVIED IN MELLO-RODS COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2010/11 03. APPROVAL TO SET ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX LEVY FOR MELLO-ROOS COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-1 (CFD NO. 88-1) FOR FISCAL YEAR 2010/11. (ITEMS 01 - 03WERE CONSIDERED AT THE SAME TIME). Redevelopment Agency, Fire Protection District, City Council Minutes July 7, 2010 -Page 8 of 14 ORDINANCE NO. FD 49 (first reading) RESOLUTION NO. FD 10-031 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING THE ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-1 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2010/11 Jack Lam, City Manager, presented the staff report on Items 01 - 03. MOTION: Moved by Michael, seconded by Spagnolo, to take up Ordinance No. FD. 49 for first reading and schedule second reading for July 21, 2010; and to adopt Resolution Nos. FD-030 and FD-031. Motion carried 5-0. P. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS The following items have no legal publication or posting requirements. P1. APPROVAL TO SET ANNUAL BENEFIT ASSESSMENTS FOR DRAINAGE AREA NO. 91-2 (DAY CANYON DRAINAGE BASIN) WITH NO INCREASE TO THE CURRENT RATE. (ITEMS P1 - P15 WERE CONSIDERED AT THE SAME TIME). RESOLUTION NO. 10-106 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DETERMINING THE COST OF SERVICE TO BE FINANCED BY BENEFIT ASSESSMENTS TO BE LEVIED IN DRAINAGE AREA NO. 91-2 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2010-2011 AND DETERMINING AND IMPOSING SUCH BENEFIT ASSESSMENTS P2. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RE-AUTHORIZING THE LEVY OF AN ASSESSMENT SURCHARGE FOR THE EXPENSES INCURRED IN THE COLLECTION OF ASSESSMENTS IN VARIOUS SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS DISTRICTS P3. APPROVAL TO SET ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 93-3 (FOOTHILL MARKETPLACE) WITH NO INCREASE TO THE CURRENT RATE. I( TEMS P1 - P16 WERE CONSIDERED AT THE SAME TIME). RESOLUTION NO. 10-108 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RE-ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 93-3 (FOOTHILL MARKETPLACE) Redevelopment Agency, Fire Protection District, City Council Minutes July 7, 2010 -Page 9 of 14 RESOLUTION NO. 10-107 P4. APPROVAL TO SET ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2000-01 (SOUTH ETIWANDA) WITH NO INCREASE TO THE CURRENT RATE. (ITEMS P1 - P15 WERE CONSIDERED AT THE SAME TIME). RESOLUTION NO. 10-109 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RE-ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2000-01 (SOUTH ETIWANDA) P5. RESOLUTION NO. 10-110 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RE-ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2000-02 (RANCHO CUCAMONGA CORPORATE PARK) P6. APPROVAL TO SET ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2000-03 (RANCHO SUMMIT) OPERATION OF AND MAINTENANCE OF PARKS AND PARKWAYS WITH NO INCREASE TO THE CURRENT RATE. (ITEMS P1 - P15 WERE CONSIDERED AT THE SAME TIME). RESOLUTION NO. 10-111 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, PROVIDING FOR THE LEVY OF SPECIAL TAX "B" FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2000-03 (RANCHO SUMMIT) FOR FISCAL YEAR 2010-2011 TO FINANCE THE OPERATION OF AND MAINTENANCE OF PARK AND PARKWAYS P7. RESOLUTION NO. 10-112 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, PROVIDING FOR THE LEVY OF SPECIAL TAX "A" FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2000-03 (RANCHO SUMMIT) FOR TAX YEAR 2010-2011 P8. APPROVAL TO SET AN ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO 2001-01 (IMPROVEMENT AREA NOS. 1 & 2) SERIES 2001-A WITH NO INCREASE TO THE CURRENT RATE. (ITEMS P1 - P15 W ERE CONSIDERED AT THE SAME TIME). RESOLUTION NO. 10-113 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RE-ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2001-01 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2010-2011 (IMPROVEMENT AREA NOS. 1 & 2), SERIES 2001-A Redevelopment Agency, Fire Protection District, City Council Minutes July 7, 2010 -Page 10 of 14 P9. RESOLUTION NO. 10-114 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RE-ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 2001-01 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2010-2011 (IMPROVEMENT AREA NO. 3 ZONE 7), SERIES 2001-B P10. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RE-ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2003-01 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2010-2011 (IMPROVEMENT AREA NO. 1, ZONES 1, 2 & 3), SERIES 2003-A P11. SAME TIMEI. RESOLUTION NO. 10-116 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RE-ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2003-01 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2010-2011 (IMPROVEMENT AREA NO. 2, ZONES 1, & 2), SERIES 2003-B P12. APPROVAL TO SET ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2004-01 (RANCHO ETIWAND,4 ESTATESI WITH NO INCREASE TO THE CURRENT RATE. (ITEMS P1 - P15 WERE CONSIDERED AT THE SAME TIMEI. RESOLUTION NO. 10-117 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RE-ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2004-01 (RANCHO ETIWANDA ESTATES) FOR FISCAL YEAR 2010-2011 P13. APPROVAL TO SET AN ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2006-01 (VINTNER'S GROVE) WITH NO INCREASE TO THE CURRENT RATE. (ITEMS P1 - P15 WERE CONSIDERED AT THE SAME TIMEI. RESOLUTION NO. 10-118 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RE-ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2006-01 (VINTNER'S GROVE) FOR FISCAL YEAR 2010-11 Redevelopment Agency, Fire Protection District, City Council Minutes July 7, 2010 -Page 11 of 14 RESOLUTION NO. 10-115 P14. APPROVAL TO SET AN ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2006-02 (AMADOR ON ROUTE 66) WITH NO INCREASE TO THE CURRENT RATE. (ITEMS P1 - P15 WERE CONSIDERED AT THE SAME TIME). RESOLUTION NO. 10-119 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RE-ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2006-02 (AMADOR ON ROUTE 66) FOR FISCAL YEAR 2010-2011 P16. RESOLUTION NO. 10-120 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RE-ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-2 (DRAINAGE AND LAW ENFORCEMENT) Jack Lam, City Manager, indicated that Items P1 through P16 would be discussed and voted on at the same time. Jack Lam, City Manager, presented the staff report. MOTION: Moved by Michael, seconded by Spagnolo, to adopt Resolution Nos. 10-106 through 10-120. Motion carried 5-0. P16. RESOLUTION NO. 10-121 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, INITIATING PROCEEDINGS FOR THE FORMATION OF A LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT TO BE KNOWN AND DESIGNATED AS LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 6-R, TO REPLACE LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 6 AND TO AUTHORIZE THE LEVY OF ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS THEREIN AND ORDERING THE PREPARATION OF AN ASSESSMENT ENGINEER'S REPORT RESOLUTION NO. 10-122 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE ASSESSMENT ENGINEER'S REPORT, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO FORM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 6-R AND TO PROVIDE FOR THE LEVY AND COLLECTION OF ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS IN SAID Redevelopment Agency, Fire Protection District, City Council Minutes July 7, 2010 -Page 12 of 14 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT AND TO PROVIDE FOR THE LEVY AND COLLECTION OF ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS: AND SETTING A TIME AND PLACE FOR A PUBLIC HEARING INCLUDING THE INITIATION OF ASSESSMENT BALLOT PROCEDURES. DISTRICT, SETTING A TIME AND PLACE FOR A PUBLIC HEARING THEREON AND ORDERING THE INITIATION OF ASSESSMENT BALLOT PROCEDURES John Gillison, Assistant City Manager, presented the staff report. In response to Mayor Kurth, Mr. Gillison stated that there is a lesser proposed assessment for vacant properties. In response to Councilmember Gutierrez, he indicated that both zones would participate in the election. Mr. Gillison noted that there were multiple community meetings in all the affected Landscape Maintenance Districts (LMDs) the first time the new assessments were proposed. In response to Mrs. Lee's statements, he confirmed that the residents were advised that the quality of landscaping would suffer ff the proposed assessments were not approved. In response to Mayor Pro Tem Michael, discussion was held regarding the level of service currently provided to LMD 6. Mr. Gillison noted that the reserve is being used to maintain the District at Level A, as requested by the property owners. If the increased assessment is approved, the level of service would not change. If the increased assessment is not approved, the service level would need to reflect a C- or D+ level or worse, as the reserve was depleted. Mr. Gillison contrasted the two processes, noting that this time there is a coalition of property owners holding their own community meetings and participating in the process. MOTION: Moved by Michael, seconded by Williams, to adopt Resolution Nos. 10-121 and 10-122. Motion carried 5-0. Q. COUNCIL BUSINESS The following items have been requested by the City Council for discussion. 01. COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS (Comments to be limited to three minutes per Councilmember.) ITEMS 01 AND 03 WERE CONSIDERED AT THE SAME TIMEI. 03. LEGISLATIVE AND REGIONAL UPDATES (Oral) ITEMS 01 AND 03 WERE CONSIDERED AT THE SAME TIME). Councilmember Williams reported that the Friends of the Pacific-Electric Trail are currently raising money to install information kiosks. She addressed the planned removal of the bridge, which will take approximately 18 months, and the temporary closure of a segment of the Vail to accommodate the project. Councilmember Spagnolo provided a legislative update, noting that the State is facing a $19.1 Billion deficit. The Governor has ordered all State employees to be paid minimum wage. He indicated that the initiative to protect local control has qualified and will be considered as Proposition 22. Also, Councilmember Spagnolo reported that AB 155 (municipal bankruptcies) has been moved to the inactive file. Lastly, he reported that six labor contracts have been approved by the Governor's Office. He expressed his condolences on the passing of David Lewis. Councilmember Gutierrez indicated that last week was quite eventful. He had a wonderful 4`h of July and was pleased to serve the community. Councilmember Gutierrez expressed his condolences to the Lewis family. Mayor Pro Tem Michael expressed condolences and indicated that the Mayor will be adjourning the meeting in memory of David Lewis. He noted that tonight's presentation on the community gardens illustrated the large number of partnerships the City has in place which provide services and facilities while at the same time saving taxpayer dollars. Mayor Pro Tem Michael indicated that the Council takes their job very seriously and stated that balancing the budget this year was extremely hard. While the fireworks were cut, the day-today services to the community are still being provided. Redevelopment Agency, Fire Protection District, City Council Minutes July 7, 2010 -Page 13 of 14 Mayor Kurth expressed his condolences to the Lewis Family. He also spoke about the passing of Bruce Martin Francisco. 02. DESIGNATION OF A VOTING REPRESENTATIVE AND ALTERNATES FOR THE 2010 LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES ANNUAL MEETING Fabian Villenas, Principal Management Analyst, presented the staff report. MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by Gutierrez, to designate Councilmember Spagnolo as the voting representative and Mayor Pro Tem Michael and Mayor Kurth as alternates for the 2010 League of Cal'rfornia Cities Conference. Motion carried 5-0. R. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING No items were identified. S. ADJOURNMENT Mayor Kurth adjourned the meeting at 8:25 p.m. after a moment of silence in the memory of David Lewis and Bruce Francisco. Respectfully submitted, Debra L. McKay, MMC Assistant City Clerk/Records Manager Approved: ""' Redevelopment Agency, Fire Protection DisVict, City Council Minutes July 7, 2010 -Page 14 of 14 RANCIfO CiJCANIONGA ftF~DEVELOFMENT AGENCY Agenda Check Ret!ister 6/39;?010 through 7; i 3:2010 Check No. Check Date VenAor Name ~ Amount AP - 09293546 7%1;2010 ,4DAPT CONSLIL'FMG INC 4,34$.75 AP-00248146 7!1;2019 ADAPT CONSULTING INC 75936 AP - 00298551 7{12010 AMERICA WEST LANDSCAPE INC 9,849.5? AP - 00298559 7i t/2010 BANK OF SACRAMENTO 15;937.33 AP - 90298568 7/!/2010 BUTSKO UTILITY DESIGN INC. 4,009.00 AP-00298610 7itn_OIO DUNNEDWARDSCORPURATION 309.79 AP - 0029$633 7/1/2010 G ANU M BUSINESS ENTERIORg 650.11. AP-00298627 7/I/2010 CrF.OGRAP~[CCS 478.50 AP-90298!>37 lit/2010 GEOGRAPHICS 209.34 .4P -00298657 7/!{20!0 HCINT DESIGN ASSOCIA'CES lNC 680.00 AP - 00298660 7!1120{0 INLAND EhfP[RE MACiAZ.FNE 2,495.00 ,4P-00298672 7/V2010 KECCOMPANY 183,541.72 AP - 00298672 7!!,'2010 KEC COMPANY -9,177.v9 AP - 002987 (2 7i 1:201 D NOBLE COMPANY, R J 150,373.34 AP - 00298712 7/!(2010 NOBLE COt`tPANY, R 1 -15,937.33 AP - 00295728 7/1;2010 PBS&J [NC 17;012.68 AP -00298730 7il!"?OEO PENVr'AL INDUSTRIES INCORPORATED 43,863.00 .4F-00298733 7!1;20(0 PIT.4SSI.4RCHITECTSINC 21,840.00 AP - 002987417 7:1126 10 QUICKSTART' INTELLIGENCE 2336.00 AP - 00298789 7/1;2010 SUIJSE'I' PURLISFI(NG 1,521.35 AP-00298799 7/02010 UNIONBANh.OFCALIFORNIA 9,F77.09 AP - 99298$01 7/{12010 URBAN GRAFF[T'[ ENTERPRISES [NC ~ 4,515.00 AP-0029$$14 7{1!2919 VI=R120NBUSINESS 3,2Cr<.IS AP-09298822 7/Ii20ED lV3A\\%ARDSF'ROCL"SSINGCENTEg 95.00 AP - 00298848 7{7{2010 ALTA LAGUN,A b1UBILE HOME PARK {,900.00 AP -0029$849 7/7{2910 ALTA VISTA MOBILE HOME PARK 1,!$0.00 AP-00298865 7;7120(9 CALED 670.90 ,4P - 09293867 7%7;20!0 CASA VOLANTE MOBILE HOME PARK [,190.(10" AP - 09298868 7/7!2010 CHAPARF24L HEIGFIT'S MOBILE HOME PARK 1,350.00 AP - 90298870 7/7!2010 CRA 26,179.09 AP - 00298880 7/7!2019 FOOTHILL MOBILE MANOR 300.99 AP - 00293852 7!7;2010 GALE GROUP,THE 33,325.53 AP-00298882 7;720(0 GALEGROUP,TE[E 24,300.09 AP - 00298892 7,'7/2010 HUNT CALENDARS LLC 49.95 AP-0029$896 7/72010 [NFC)USAMAR.KETING 12,550.90 A[' - 00298909 7;'7/2910 NEWSE3ANK iNC 6,055.00 .4P - (10298914 7!7/29(0 PfNF..S MOBILE H064E PARK, THE I, 100.00 AP-002989[8 7;7/2010 EZAMONAVILLAMOBIT..EfiOMEPARK },lt)OAO :\P - (1029$930 7'7%291 U SYCAMOKL: VILL:4 MOBILE E[Ub4E PARK 760.00 AP - 90298949 7/7/2910 ADVANTAGE BUSINESS MEDIA LLG 4,665.09 AP - 00298992 7;7/201fl DUNN F..DWARDS CORPORATION 646.95 AP-00299008 7%72010 FUTURELIGF[TING 4<)4L61 AP - 00299041 7x7201(1 LI, J[ONG 8U0.00 AP - 00299066 7/7/20{0 OFFICE DEPOT 8.99 AP-00299086 7{7/1.010 L2JMDESIGNGROUPINC 1,318.70 AP - 00294128 Z'7/2UI0 W'ATSON PANTING CORPORATION 22,270.00 AP-002991^28 7;7{2010 WATSONPAINTINGCORPORATEON 27,730.99 AP - 00299li 1 7171^_010 WEST END MATERIAL SUPPLI' 3.534.43 Tote! fur Check FD AP: 630,771.45 EP-00001189 7/1/20[0 PENDLETUNPARTNERSINC 4,303.09 Total for Check [U F,P: 4,303.00 Total for Entity: 635,074.41 User. VI,oPE7 Ve,wnica Coper Pa,+,e: I Report:CK_AC,ENDA_RFG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK:.Agenda Check Register Poraait La}roui P-1 Current Date: 07!14{301 Time: 11:16:4 P-2 N Ol E U O T U C d Q wCC G d d ~ O ~ ~ ~ o N C rL N M O O ~O d •O U 1~. y` O voa o °- S U N~ LL +~ C Z `~~ ~~ ~ g ~ ~ n ~ n rv N p C O O N ~ (J I H O ' n ~ > ((yy n ~ m ~. 1N N H ~ Y W O O (V ~ N H O b n c o m n q« O~ n m m "~ .. E w ~ m v, I ~ ~ 0 r g N m 0 e W ° n o m ° o- m a o A e[ 0 N n lh O l ~ O Y ° 10 a O m Y p N ~ N N 0 n LL 3 8 O f J O 1 O O q m b G ry ~ Cpl pj m b m N ~ m 1 y y t m N cJ Vi 1~ ~ th n A P fI f0 M N p Oi Y A N 0 A N m V _ n N N OI O Y ~ Nf i y N ! ! D N m i p p o m °o O N N m " ~ ~ y O O Yl f ! W O rp y rG O O M N ~ 0 O N ~` lC ~ 1 N 0 O1 N ~ CI I~ y , . N OI N m O O~ W N 10 jy q (p O N Oi N O W Cl N N Gl N N P ~ ~ N N O O O O O ~ N m ~ 0 a j { y ~ C q O O O O ~ m n h 9 ~ Pi g ~ N _ ~ w a o ~ o ~ ' ' L V O O N C O~ b ~ O N N M N C c D ~ ~ c ~ LL O g 5 p~ U ' c X o p ~ U m ~ ~ m C q T p Y a ~ ~ o c' '~ w rn '~ ¢ vl m m E ¢ E A o m H ~ ry °' E ~ j i E ~ r ~ c N c N m y N U O N a ~ m s `p c cv v 'S aUi C Q ~jC a N U °u - N C ~ o .p 10 m 4? w 10 U L c ~ o n ~.g v ~ o U a ., y r 5 a C > ry O a '~ `-° E m i v °c ~= d N = N U ~ C aE E - O p .. m C L O mr n d m ~~ 5 C .~.. 0 am w 6 m N o y c as rn ~ °u ~ ¢ c ¢ E ~ p) m LL I~ O H L C N L ~ ^ ~ _ o v E d a x O'y Q ~ 0 vl O c _ C O 1 V O `~ O ~ u0i l0 ~ L d u E m ~- p o U o O y O ~ c ;~ ~` d e m.~ m E rn a ~ E° E m W 1G N - N N N >~ ~ C o my ~ ~ m E N O NL C h ' ~ N Ip J N Ol t p C C N ~~ O ~ ~ m E ~ v o v d E U D ? V C O U O a a~ h ° c a 9 c d N C N O ~ ~ d ,~~ C b yOj O f6 N C OI O p r p\ E d .= m > l0 Ol N 'y~ N V C O N OJ IG m L d O C r ~ cEc ~ C~ r O M ~ ~ O r ~ ~ O O ~ Q O f7 n 6a` d X N {p C T O N O H u N U ~ mE= °o 'o n ¢ ~ d m m '°-> or .n a .~ o t` N S~ m y U d C _ O O oa TN ~ N.. O A ~ ~ ~ 3 Q i ~ c voE `o U ~ t' y ~ r c m p ~a '°- q ~ m 2c E' m O h fA a vl T 61 t y O > O ._ N O~ t R m U 0 Y ~~ m3 m~ C A ~ C N ~ a m r'- m y > 1~ U "EO q t c U ¢ w .¢> 1-p 0 r U 6 JQ W ~p ~ LL g d az a 0 N O O N o m b o 0 0 t m 6 < a - C O C 8 ° 6 ~ ~ P-3 O ~' N N M N N b M Q a N ^ ^ O O M M N^ M d b N M M :a Fy a o ^ o `0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o ry o ^ U~ ^ N N N V () ~V ~ ~ ` `~1 N N N N N` N N N ~V N N N N N N N~` O O\ b v ~ 0 ~ (p ~ q d 10 d 1 d N l7 a$ m~ d ('` ^ O Ili ^ ' N O O N N O_ ~' `V LV O~ N (V el N O ~ ~ LL ~ ~ n O O T M (O (~ 1~ a Cpl YZ ~~pp b N YI f, h h f~ M O 6 O O O O O O O O~ O O O O O O O O O O 1 E~ O O tq M: O O M d A A W A A M q b q O O M ry A (O o O M A~ N M O O ~ `K y ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ A ID A A O O m n b O^ N OI M 00MMMlOAgAb" O' d~ gg1~g q J~'-J ~' LL 0 ~ I I I M Cl I O O N N ^ O O O O O N M O N O M O O O i ^ b O 0 0 O O N M N N N VI D O O O N N N b N N 1 O N ^ ~ f 0 W W v N M O M IO A O Y1 b O N O O N N M O O M O ^ C1 10 A q N O O O O _ , M M (V lV C! N^ lV N N N ^ N N N M M N N N^ M N O O; O ( a a tmmp m a m ryary qq W rymm qNm tN~~p ryary ryAlp m@@ 1ary~ 1WqQ m a 1aq~ 1sryt (m~pp 1a~Qp lWq~ IG 6 0 0 0 Q Q Q 4 6 Q Q 6 4 Q 6 Q Q Q Q Q 6 Q 6 Q 8 I i I ) p p ° S N N O O N N N b N N N N N O °O S S m~ O i~ m N N ~ b n f I H O b^ M IO 10 (O M d g M A b b O fO S N N O O O N V N V a Q' ~ C O O ^ M ( M M N N N N^ N CI N N ^^ N Cl N N M f N m o 0 0 o M Qp S O S M O O O m°° S S O S O O S O S ~ 0 0 0 O ~ O O O O C'1 M ~ , W, O O O O O O O O O OO q O OO M M 0 O O O ~m O O O 00 O O O N O O O N O p O p O S : W ~ N N O O A O, 17 VI O O O O O O ~' M O O N O O N 0 0 ~p p~ S p 8 8 m W C p r p O O O O q, S m1 O q O O W a) O S S O N q d q OI O q m ' l N b . . _ _ , ^ b N I7 M^ d ^ M< O Y O! M M N N VI N (7 d d N q e d I p p H p'I O p N O N S C O S O O O O O O S O N N h O W j O O p O O O O O i O O G O~ N O ~I N N g N ~ N YI b O O O N O g O N O N I Np 1N N O A J ] Y ; W q ~' A q 0 N A VI ^ A O h !; N^ O O M A b M O ^ Y q q m ^ b W M A M f0 M 10 M 1` M W O l+l 0 N W g q N M O q Yf N M N ~1 , Ya W ~ N q A N g y ' M Vl O y 0 M VI t+l f N b N W O O N O O O O O O ~' 10 O O O O O O O O O ~ L q pj q q q :N N f _ , _ N d Ih N N N N C1 O d b d M M M VI N N M N d M O d Q 0 ~ Y C M d ~ N d ~ ° ° ° o $ 80 °o 0 000 °° °o 000 o g~ g °o 88 $ o° O ~ y o o o o o °, , , , 0 ° ° N ~~ ~ > , o c g S o c o o c ° o o $ oo ~ o° °o D o p o g o o ° °o ~ o ° ° ° ° ° ° ° R C O ~ ~ 0 p _ o, , 0 0 0 0 0 0, o o o o o o o o, 0 0 0 N o o 0 0 c o y o o c o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ o 0 0 0 0 o g o 0 0 o o R C I a ~ ~ ~ 0 ° g 0 0_ o y° o S o 0 O O O O O O d, M N M M M b YI N M N N ~m N (~1 O ~ C~ p d Ip Im N N d ~ d ~ o m ~ • I O R Q ~ V ~ ° 3~ m a ' ~ ° a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o D o 0 0 0~ o 0 0 0 0° a m O , p° 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o D r o 0 o r o ry o N N N N N V O u () ~ t (V N ~~ N N~ N N ~V N N~ ~ N N N ~~ O 10 C! N f ^ 10 0 O O d O LL " N d ^ ^_ N\ O O N N QN_ O_ ^ N O O^ N M M N ~ a ` N L O C H ~ m m m (~ ^ a CI O O N (~ O ° O S S O^ ? 0 0 O G D D C D M a ° O D D ~"' ( i c y A S N N q {L m Ie o a = ~ b b m Qm NW Z n Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y r i J Y Y Y Y Y Y Y 2 Z 2 Z Z Z 2 Y Z Z 2 Z Z Z Z Z Z 2 d LL ~ ^ a Q _ Q Q a Q Q Q a < Q q QQ < m m m m b m m m m m a! lL W m Q Z Q Q Q QZ QZ QZ ~ [D m 1- H F- f m ~ ml m f0 OS CI 01 F V- ~ LL ~ Q ! C ' H H L- F V- ~ h H F z z z ' I .- U '~ S H o o S o 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 o S S z z z z z < W ~ ' ~ w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w¢¢ a¢¢ a a 0 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ¢ ¢ ~ ¢ ¢ ~ ~ rc ~ o O o 0 0 0 J J ? ~ ! ~ U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U J J J J J } O ~ U ~~~ E `Z ~ E `1 ~ '~ `2 E E~~ `Z W W W W W W W W ~~ g `Z ~~ K U m 2 m j m ~ CL ~ C fL 2' K K K K K K K K C K K O O ' W S S 2= O = _ LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL la4 LL l¢L LL LL 4 LL a ~ W ~ F ~ ~ t l J J J J J J J J a U (A m a I J J J J J J J J J J J J Q C W 9 Z C W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W 0 ~ 0 O H O ~ 0 ~ 0 0 O O 0 O 0 0 0 O O O ~ U C a J Q a W a p O W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W ~ U (9 ~ LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL 9 yy~ O b O > > 3 ~ i! N Q N H O m Q a c a ~ V o c c LL O 9 9 C O U v(] ~ 10 0 M d b 0 :[f d A O 31 O^ N Op V N b W A% M N ~m b b q 10 O > a q O O N ~ O O^ N N M M' d Q O O 0 ~~° 0 0 0 0 C E v ly o O^ ^ ^ ` ` ^ m ^ _ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ E I o ` m m C ~ ry r o ti a ° o T O C Lv O ' L N R C Q U Z 0 Z Z 6 N J Y N m ~ ~ Y m 2 ~ M Q I - 0 6 N 7 a LL J e : q A m ^^ U a d y' m O i l Z Q C K m 7 ~ ~ Kx'~' m 2 8 E m a c?c7 c7c~c ^> _~ _ OKZx x - a n M m m n n~ n n ~M' O M m m ~ m m ~ ~ n M M ~ O i n i O~ r i I n m I "' f U J b U 41 V n '1 M m LL ~ ~ M ~ M M (^~f l7 17 I^') l7 I') fl l; M Cl ~ M ~ I'J I'l I P-4 N f_.~'Y M b p^ O CI ^ N M N N M M ~[] VI ~[! ' N N N_ ^ H M' m N h Q M M N^ a a N m'' O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Q 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O Q (~ N ~ « O j N N N\ N N N N ~ N N `V i`I ~ {{VV ~`` f` ` N N N N ~V (V N N iV N^ ~ n W Y O Y^ N m Onl w^ ~ON$ W ~lI n! ~ lJ O d w Q m a ry m fa m Q O b a ~ N O O O N``` N ~V M N N O `V N ^ M O I o 0 0 0 ° ° •- `~ A $ a ~ $ A ~ ~A 'm o n ~ ~ ~ ~ r A o ii ~ o `0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 „~ wPNM1~NN^mNNOVIw NI~OMwMO mmw^Nwmm m bm N ~ m S m N m N n A f~ m d m Q w N O b CJ m y n S N h Q a N ° d q H~ O h, N O O m w m b w `_ ^, ' m^ b F b m m w' t0 w'' O ` I O n N I m w ~ O A e- ~ J ~ LL ~L m O O m m OI O O O O fD Q OI O O O O m O N O O N O N O O O O N h W m N Y N S Y w m O m O O O G O O N N f M m g O m O m O ^~ b ^ O m w M N b N m O O m N O N N O b N b N d e- CI N Q m N N N N M M ~ N CJ M N N M N N (V N N M M^ M N N N a ~~~aa~~8~~~~~~a~~a8~2~a~<<~aa~ ~B ~I p N O O p Op b O O O S O O p O O p O O N O O 8 O O S 0 0 0 O O O g S pl q j m N ~ O CA'1 N N N m O O m N O N N O m^ N m N Q O 8 n O S 8 1~ m O ~~ ^ N N N M N N N N M M ^ N M M N N M N N fV N N M M^ M N N ^ ~^ N '. p p m' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 O O O O O O S O O O O O O O O O O O 8 O O O m 1~ m m ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 j , m °° ° $ ug v°o °o °o °0 0 °o °0 °0 e g o 0 08 80 o g o e °o, °o, ~ g g o °o, ~ ~ ~ m o °o o w o 0 0 o m a d o o m d d o m X 0 0 o ro m ~ o 0 0 0 0 0 0 .~' o~ °° m °n °a c o 0o n °w m~ w e w o o °0 0 w w w o 0 0 m t $ °o Q w o o ~ o w, rn m g 8$ 0 w 8 ~i Q o w 0 rn, m o g 8 m~ w m M M N M M Q b Q d N d M M CJ N d 17 W d^ C'1 N^ Q Q M N M d N P N d 1` 1 p p p j O N O O O O O O O O O O O O pO O O N O N Yl O 8 O N O O, O O N N M ~D w y m~ N~ N O (m`I °° N m Q Q N 17 m O m N ~ °p O ~ (mV m N 0 N A N O N O d N ~ ~ :' A M e( Nf p O m bm m. ~ m pQ ( Fp ( np O) pM O m, N m N Q M m m N m n m N N m m m, q GJ Y d p O O N M A n N O O O O O, O O O O N O N W O O O O O O S O N IOp i O O O i O O O m m_ O N O Q y ~' V M N N Q Q N m Q Q t7 N Cl m Q^ M m N d m Q N C] O N~ i M b m 0 W d ~ E y p m o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 o g g $$ 8 g °0 8 °o °0 °o o° ~ °o °o e s 8 s °o °o o° °° °o g y d> ~ _ o o °°° o 0 0 ° ~ ~co >° 8oogg8$8 $°og °o °o °o °°'88888 °°°" ~ g 880 0 °.o o ° 8 oS 8.08 8 o M G C N ~ q0,? qoo 0 00 ? 00 0 C , N o° 0 0 0 0 0 o d o 8 g o °o °o e° °o ° u°0~ °° e° °o °° $ °o °o uoi e o 0 ~ Rj N ~ m' °o°o, o on °o oo°g S °o°0 0 00 000 °0 0~i °08 o go 0 00 ~n e o g g C C ~y' Y M N M M m N Q d V] m d d M N d ('~ N d^ M b N d N< N M Q N q M M m O GO ~ C V ~ 0 ' 1 3 C o q'i °°° a o o °' o o° o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o a w w o 0 0 0 0 0 rn w $ o 0 0 0 o r 0 o N o N ry 8 o r g 8 0 o r O 0 b °o °o U O Y"' L O ~ N t°`! (~! l`1 N N N iV ~ N m ` N ~Y ~~ N N N N N N N 1"' ~+ n 3 Q M ~`n w v w m ~ n vi ml. o< m ~n m m~ m g m~ Q o O a ~ ^ N O O^ N_ ^ N _^ N M O N_ N N O N ~~++ M f = d a. m '" ~ a~ S o 8 0 0 0 0 0~ °o ~ o o~ o o~ o 0 0 0 `o 0 0 `g Ao ? V o° o 0 0 C b m m w rn O i G a n a d d b h d LL Q 6 R Q m m' C K K C K K K C K d' K K K > m` 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 b b a m 1..1 U U U U U U U U U U U U O m (7 ~ ~1 (7 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ S w Y Y Y Y r r r r r r r r r r r r r m 2 Z Z Z~~~~ p~~ Z~~~~~ Z Z Z 2 2 Z Z 2 Z Z Z 2 Z ~ Q QQ a a 0 O O O O O O D O O O O O N N ~n N ,n N N N N to ty/~ y w m m m m ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ `~ ~ ~ ~ `2 f `C N N V1 N f0 ml N h N rn N V) N z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z a a a a a a a¢ a a a a a a a¢ a a a a a a¢ a a a a¢¢¢ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0~ u o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o r r r r r r r r r r r r J J J J J J J J ~~~ ~~~ ~~ g ~~~ ~ W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W ~' r E E F E D ~ E~ ~ E~ f E~ E E F ~ r~ r~ F ~~ F~~ r r m O O m ' o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o a ¢z a~ z z i~$~ z~ i A Y~ x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x z z S! a JJJJJJJJJJJ JJJ JJJJJJJ JJJ m KR' ~ w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w ~ ~~ ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0^ o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LL LL LL LL lwL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL lL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL L m ~~ m O O a a a ~ # G m N O G `c o. ° E o U a y m !~ M ^ N N w m M f0 w m d m O w M < N N M m N b A O O O y M M d 1` N m [O m w^ N N N 1'1 M Q' ul n n OJ O O^ N Q C _ V) ^ ^ IO ° O G O O ^ ^ -, ^ ^ O O O O O e`- r r e- ~ ^ ^ e- U ~- ^ m w ~ m N d T i C ° IU ~ a d C d e N Q is O b O j LL b N K X Z Z Y N y~ N X^~ LL U' m Z N N Q 5 N W ~~^ O Y U' Z F m m » N ~L N O U' p N U W 7 T W U W' 7 J ^L j~~> j m `~ w w m w m w w x x 2 x a ~ m m m m d m m m X X X X X X X X Xm X X X X O O LL LL LL LL LL LL m LL~ LL LL LL W Nm Nm M M m m m m m m m m y < S {p m ~p ~p ~p m ~p w m ~p ~p b O ~ N ^ M H N N N N N N N N N N NI d C] m Ct M (~ M {`t M M E S l7 d N N C O LL M M M M M M M M M M M m M t"1 m M M M M Cl M M M M M M M M M M H w w ~ n Z'q ~ l ~O N N a ~ ~ o r ~ x M N ~ tb'1 n 0 ~ f r r r N H Y N N 0 O QI a b N N Q- M O ~, d j d ~ d ~ N '6 y d o ~ ~ C O ~ N C 1 ~ ~ N O C ~ •_ M O :± m £ o m ~ ~ ~ o ~ v a° o r s ~ ~ a c NA ILL D ~ b O 1 b ~1' N b 3 O O i q N N y I 1~ t` b mi b ~ h ~ W (V N N Yj N A e° a' 0 0 0 0 b YI N N b b M 1'1 N N N b CI N °0 0 ~ g 0 p0 N N_ N O fZ e d n 0 N d N mu ~°m m Q tll m n v ~' O O ~ w U ~ K N ~ R O K W f Q Q V = m U m 2 m Q b W a' z o J R a N b O N 0 0 m N Py N m n m N m m A a a q O V C ' O m n '~ _ c~ 'u u> 'c m ~ ~ P-5 a ~ U O o a' ~ LL O ~ a i 6 n po_ l` 6 0 rc a a $ Z' t ~. _. m m' 0~I 0 0 f 9~ Ul L 8 m d Q Q « t ~ R ~ U ~ o ~ ~ N N N • ~ ~ ~ m M Q 0 C ~ ~' 3 U O o a a m o L a' V C ~ e m i Q a U N b N ICI. N N °o N 0 Q Z Q LL J Q U LL Y 2 Q m 0 C O U U Q N a J ~ O m G R d u _N b C '> m in ~n ro n 0 N it U N v _c ~ ~ 2 0 a Q N 0 U C A A mq l i Q a n ti N M 0 n A N C d E b 7 la A N U 'S O H P-6 U ~ o_ ~ O °i t ~ o e a ~ 6 0 O n K v ~, m a $ ° % n ~~ 9 q ~ o, O ' ~ rv W m N m W A q d N n a c ~ o ; nE E? 93 ~ ~ O Y y1 0C Q C ~ ~n d O N j° °' `o y C M 7 d ~ '~ d C. ~ T 7 ~ ~ ~ h t ~ CR m e 3 C C C~ ~ 1 O + O A u^ C G ~ 16 O ~ ~.+ Q O N r V O a ~ v~ mrc Z d N ~ ~ mC c c m mm m T N c E e U g~ g E? a,i m 0 g N r Z < LL N z ~ U ~ o j 4 a tl) 4 N Y' U t ~ C O ~_ D tL c ,~ d m T c m Q Y U N J ~ (o 0 5 N a a C LL E I~ I~ Iy h U of of ~I~I i O M O r to e H a Q V U tt w _ w o 5 N W 0 U m D n a m ~ Y N ~ O a' V m L O 00 00 0 0 0 0~ 0 g 0 0 0 0 O o 0 0, o o a o 0 0 0l 0 o c o 0 0 0 0 0 0 o c o 0 o °o ~°n 1°n u°1 °o `~ O 01 O~ 01 OI O OI i(1 r O N N m Ct £,,.. _ i 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0° o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o a o 0 0 N N` N N N (N_(~~ N N_ = N O N O N ~ ~ ~ N N~ N N 40`'1 ~ m l0 (~ 10 0 (U 10 IO ~ 10 fa 10 (O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 6 O O O O N 00 O O O 0 0~ N O O N N^ I~ N m O f0 t0 O O N N M N O N 1`~ [V ~ N Cl N N N N N N N N N ~ O O O Z 2 2 2 Y Y Y Y Y~~~ Q 6~ Q 2 2 Z Z §QZ ~~~ Z Z F F H m m m m m m~~~ y N ~ O O ~ Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Q Q W w w w Q Q Q Q Q Q 4 Q~ U s a w ¢ O O O O O 0 0 0 U U U U W W w W W W W W K K K ~ ~ ~ ~ rL ~ ~ ~ `~ F- F a Q a Q o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0¢ ~Z LL LL LL LL S 2 2 S S 2 Z S Z J J J J J J J J J J J W W w w w W w W w W w w W W O H O ^ 0^ O ~^ 0 0 ~ O 0 LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL O 0 U N O N 01 O N m m 1~ Y O tD I^ yi ~ a ~ 0 0 0 0 p O ~ p 0 T c w Q V1 ° N N LL Y$ Y C7 n N X U H ~ 7 Y 1- i~ F$ O K V' () Y w m > d K ~ I- F m ~ .- X X X X X X UV' COy7 a3 u 9 M tm+a tmO m N M Im~l f ~ tm`1 t'J m ~ ~ ~.. IL n n m M M m m m n `n m m m io O O 0 0 e`~ r~ N r r lV N of o G OO M O 0 4; m o e Io u f/1 n q ~ 10 1~ 0 V Z I `~ Z G w fL s a F Ni QLL N U 0 o' U m .' d h J m 1- 0 0 0 m 6 ~ N 'u ~C m ~ o N m O 0 N 0 g K 0 LL Z' U E o E Y ~ a N m T Z ~ O O j ~_ U Q N d m N P C _ ~ m ql y o fan o ~> '~ ~ ~ rc v a° arc s a 0 a 0 O K m m a ° r u e r a~ ^ q m a W N ~ T m r N of N w C C Q, N ~ Y O ~ M d ~ d C d ~ T-~j ~ l6 ~ L N C T Of ~ W fa 3 C ~ w O E ~ ~>L R O v ~ 7 O N oa s d ~ _ C 3 ~f6 ~ LL O N C ~ O ; 6 ~ Ea 0 ~3 0 °m~ m r u ~~ ao pO tl N N 0 b N O N 0 0 m N S a n c m O q V~ N A F ~= ~~ ~, p10 1~ N C C m O OO h = W tO. P 0 m A m m a rv o. b W O F a a N m m m C b b d L H 7 U Q ~~ K U ~ o f o c, r o i a f d h O C 0 0 K V M i0 ~D O OJ M ~O O t0 40 ~O 1~ (V O m N O N M V I~ 1~ P ~O W M M V [h N O O) m r O ~- O 0) of O O 1~ i~ n N O VI M M OJ C W T O ~ m M C M P M M U N M ~ ~ ~ 1` r ~ N N M F9 Fq W fA 19 fA iA N ' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 ~ O OJ O 0 O O O O O O O N N r O O O O Ci 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ .,m. ~ Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q m ~p^ ZZZ Z Z Z Z Z ZZ Z r 0 mo A m N O O O O O O N O ON ~ O S U I ~` ~ ry ~ ~ O ~ ~~ Q ~ MM Cam' C'am' ~oC E a a ~mm OJM mw ~m~m z ~ < c m ~ U Q C < U ~ O ~ T a y O LL ~ N i EO E M C 1 ` o~ c r VI N N a a a N b a s N N a s N N N /i a a a a m c~ ' n c c c c c 0 0 c c >> c c c c a>>> E > mF ~ m a y o 0 0 LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL a N C Y Y~ ~ ~ ~ Y Y Y Y Y K C A i W `m `m m m m m `w A R R N ~ O C ~ L C a ^ >. T T T T ~~ N N N N ~ O q 0 C C C C C C C 0 0 L C G C 0 0 0 0 l d 0 0 0 ~ ~ ~ O O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ '1 « U U ~ o `O O a i V LL ~ m E ~ LL C 1' ~ Z c~ C N C C a ~ a C 7 7 9 C 7 ~. O c LL LL LL LL `~ ii n Z . m n 2 m m n a m U C N 9 C w N C ~ d N m n«'c f D o c Um d m a ti: N N0. KN ~ ~- W a O G O O ~ ~ J 9 m OI OI Q N L Q IL !i l LL y m N N N M LL F 3 3 3 3 a y N N F q a c W L m C Q m m ~ ~ m y x W ~ ~ > > > Z K ~ ~ _ c w Q 0 o Z Q o O G7 v N ~ c~ ~ m W m o o o _ Q N Q Q Q 7 x X ~ J F S F- F O r a o °~ rn o F' n 'a u s u 5 L C n U v v N P-9 m c 0 E U 0 r U U N C /~/0~ W C d 0 r:+ m £ O r U R ~ ~ O G 7 N ~ N o 'a~ oM H ~ ~ ~ `~ O a °a° Q 0 ~ C n ~> (,°n ~ ~ ~ o w ° o b n fi °iIm ~ w o. ~ OFI^~' f e O ? °a C o 0 0 0 G 6 8= 0 N j ro ~ m m F N O) N mdl~ ~ o Al m N 3 N e 0 m N N d 0 n m m N C 3 °w F G a~i y m E E E N ~ d C ~ C .m O Gl N C p~ 9~ C ~ W d Y u~ sl ~~m ~ h s oIm ~; A m } U LLI, e ~ N b r -y b O GI WI"N' o t ~ O O ~ M C ~'' C ~ ~ C y li qN ~ m o Nj T C ~ ~ I m o I q,Y w i w ~ w . ~ ~~ ~ 0 ~ Ip- U Q W m m a d a c E °n p N N U N N Q C m m E L N ~_ ~ d U ~ C C Np C V ~ u p ~ c c m m N ~ N N L O VVi 0 N N C V d o E tll j C ~ o a ~ E O Q~ ~ a Ft o~ N m U E y o O T a ~_ NP a3 p O > L y N 9 [Ni N ~ C R d ~ V o j E w U N ~ m Ua 0 0 U p c ~ `° 3 ~ O d t V N C O ~I C m E E ~ m W O~ C ~ -a L C r ~ m E y N c ~ m ~ d L m I- U r' p O t0 O ~ N a~ d N_ N Or IL- 6 P-7 0 a ~ Q U ~ 1- ~; o n ~ D ~~ O ~ ~ a ~ n 0 0 N O M d O 0 N 0 o O o O d o m C o a ° m R' rc P-11 m a !~ V C ~ 0 •~ d 0 V R C N O C Q ~ ~ o> `~ O d r O r ~ 0 c°~ a° ~ p a oa' 3° r T~ om~ ~' ~ o o °n 0 0 0 0 0 0 w aI d °o S S] i N N O IS ~ O y I N N N N 'J I 0 b ~p q ~ O n O YI b m W O m m m W N N N N N N N 3 b t0 t0 N O n F 7 W W b N M h M ~~ nN W b N N N j ~ N N 0 o ro- ~ ro m m `~ vi wi vi d m m b N N N N ~ O L 0 N a' ~ m c tO 1p m eO 0 0 a1° m e 0 0 5 ri ri z O J U LL m ~ N Y W ~ ml ~ 4 Z v v p ~ c z m 10 ~ m 'I c ~ '°- ~O a it U N _' a m E, m! m > ~ ~ ~ a m m m m P c m N N C 0 ~ N p N ~ O V I (~ N d~ m U N o ~ LL LL' K Q d C a ~ d R Q 'v O P~7~~ m U ~~' m F ~> m a o n o i~ a v r a ~ 0 a E d C ~ O O INO ~ tR W r 0 n m QI 41 m N fl ~ N C q O; O G G O O O O 6 W O G O Ea y e d H o n 0 n ~3 0 qy~ 0 p N N m b o e O N M b C N yo m = M d i. y Q 7 fC G/ T --> C.1 ~ H t O C T m A m 3 Q ~ M O CO N Q •~ Y W 0 ~- U O c ~ Q ` C W ~ N N d r u~ o Q d ~' ~ N ~ Q C C C O O O C C N O n '1 M C! d m ~ m 5 r `f M Z C O LL Q U Z 8 LL i a m ' ' E w z o w a N _ ~ T L ~ # C O ~ U c m ~ "' Q E yr m m j 5 c _ f!/ 9 ~ .- M d R ~ a C A J u ~L P d N C m ~ ~ E W m E "' a y ~ m G e ~ V ` F ~ ~ N 2' P-13 W c ~ o o w N O U 0 L c g > ~ ~W `0 0 _T ~ U N ? O~ E ~~I Q O e a° N Y m c-' m 7 Q ~ m C m o E m ~ ~ ~ V O C 7 N !0 Q ~ fA p M Q {Q ~ •Q C x 3 ' Q ' ~ n a Q ~ N I.L C Z; 1 ,~` ~~ r = a~ m m r o N Q P ~ r N r q M ti I N n O n Y f m I m e N ~ < O ~ O O m ~ N O O b 7 n ~ N N O m N ^ i O O O ~ n N O ~ T O h ('~ ~ b N O m N P b NiN NN fV ~ lV NIN n r N N m 01 b m N m C ~ 'O I c W I~ d Y u LL e I m u~ n rs J m ° `O• ~ u o n i ~' ` ~ ~ m o in O O .- N N N O m N N ~ ry N N W m ~ ~ O m n N N E U m N 0 0 M O O LL m O O it Q I °f ~ ~ i I O O O 6f m o o m o °o °o m h °o °o m O f~ l7 h O m P P 0 N b c c a m n ~ j LL LL ~' U v E '-' u ~ ~ > N C c O ~ ~ ~ N o O ~ Q ~ m E w N v S r ~ - m v LL 3 W m H N b H N C y m y d ~ E Via' m v m m 5 V d C .d. L .o c ~ G ~ t ? O ~ U Q V! f~- C 0 w C O d C W f e Onl N V ~ n ~o r ~ ~ O N C U ~ C ~'y m ~ m `o T Y 0 m C m ~ u U Q W a a N A U ~ ~ m 9 O y O I~ K O c ~ o d¢ v a f ~ a c E d n T G N OI C Q d W E v L ~ v ~ rn c m ~ a` $a m m C W m ~ a° w c~L O m 4 .m. N C W c E m i ~ o a o U O~ as x 2 m ~~ N N E 9 m O a C Q W- o ~ ' o ~ ~ L N N m N U d ~ C N d O) U _ O ~ E m U W m o Uj o ~ J O' c 3 ~ O N ~ t . _G `oL r W C L °' E E o ~ o N ~ ~ C a O M t C m O O m ry N y C O T y tO e e is m~ a ~ U O O d O rv m N G _ v C 8f ~ o ~ n~ C m m V d ~ m N~ m K rc ~ ~ N ~ a .~. T, A ~I P 7 d N N C .~ Q y CC L C O ~ d o ~ r ~ n' C O V ~ N 1 Q ~ N M R R ~ y C v ~ c ~ r GO.~ p a m a° N N p L 0 a m m wu q Q'm' 0 N N N N O O V~ p (~ ( O O O .- ~ h o N p M CNJ M M I m m o O o 0 N b o N N V Q O O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ u d d ~ N 0 :S. :~ n ~ K O S S I O O 0 S 0 O O O O O O O S O 00 fV N ~ 1D C~ 's i O 1^ Z O O ~ LL m 4- Z w N I > z U m Z 01 W ~ Q > J a a C o '° J 3 9 N LL C 0 m C T Y C I ~ o U is °o o S I °o o °o °O o 0 0 o O 000 °o N m O S a N N N N N u0i C S C g °o O 4a? z z z 000 LLQ LL LL U U U O O O m Y Y Y m m m m > a Q ~ ~ z z z ~ J > > q O Y N N m Cl d- ~ Y v V m O N y M ~ h U U U U ~ 1~ N 1() U rn °m °m N ~ N N E N ~- N N< M ', o~ o 0 0 0 `o 0 0 o f '. (V N N N~ N N N N N p 110] O Q N O IA S 1[1 ~ O S m h O N O N O N N~ 10 O ~- r (V ~ ~ ~- ~ ~ A N N S °o ~°n n o °o °o v°~ °o °o, °o n O O N Q M G O O N G O O m S O M 17 N N N O O O O O O N (V m] T O O O O O m S S N O Omi_ O0i P O N L7 N N P M N V N N 1f1 1'i N ~ OQ O O O O O O O O O O O ~ 1[I O O O O pO O O O O N O I f0 O M M 0 01 N N O h 1p N 1~ O~ N h O M O ~' m r o o+ 6 o H e N 0 o voi o0 o S o N'vi In m"' M< M N 1n n 1'i N M N ~ ~O ", _:_. rn m o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ON N N N (0V N N N N N N {a 1~ h M m m m T 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O M H a a a a a a ~ ~ K K a' ~ K 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 Y U V V 0 0 0 °- ~Z OOU' C7 U' O Z Z2 F m~~~ `L ~~ N h h p Z Z Z Z Z Z Z a Q a W a a a a a a a o 0 0 ~ooooooo~~~ (J J J J J J ~ W W W W W W W J J ~ ~ ~ `t ~ ~ `~ ~ F F F m a 0 0 0 0 O O O a a 6 n J J QJ J J Q Z Z ~ III O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O ~ w w www w w w w w w LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL O M H O C O it V) fe'! N S N OMJ Q Y Y S M CmJ y e< v a a a v v v e a 7 _b T C m N O tp 1)D ~ n ~' M C O Q W I~ M N F F' ~ F' C SN (`J h (D N m W T m X X X X X X U' ' LL LL ~ O M M N N N N N O ~ C01 m LL M M M m 1n ri in M m M eS N` O N N ~ N N O m N a O Op O a O ~ ~ X 0 0 O1 N 1~ N N h N m m M) O I h m 1~ 0 N O N O N ~[h1 f0 O N ~ ~ .- r r ~- e- ~ ~ N N m m m m m m m m m ..i, OryI O Q 0 O .i, ~~ r ,.. N r h N O n N M h e r 31 m N m m m M O m fL ~ LL a J 9 3 ~` 'w a~+ a a in LL d N o Q d 0 m IL N N P d N 3 ~ m N n h O m W i 4 C H P-14 a ~ a U 6 ~ _ i 0 ~ n 5 a° ~ a b O N a m O rc P-15 r `m a r U m ~ m ~ ~ a ~ O LLI •~- L' c e o ~,~~ ~ a ~ 0 m n f m a T D O O E a m d q /i j N N N N F A ~ (J N N N q q N 8 m N b y ~ 0 ~ 0 N N N N lV N N N O W N ~ O ~^ .6 ~ °' ' C ~ m O m C t d N O E U «~ d i ~ ~ co of ~ ~ m V R y N ` o m O C M a m r Q ~ ~ ~"~ ~ u ~ ~_ O C a' O W ' N y ~ L d y Cs 0 C O O w n ° 5 aad ~ gs Q n', n ^ ¢ h rnu g ~ A C A O n a'm v ~i m v ~ m ~ c m ~ n n c ° > c 6 '^ L N 9 % U c m 3 E n ~ b 7 C 0 D C a O o' m > ; U ¢ ~~^ Q U ~ rn I- - ` a °- ~' I~ ~ n s° 0 a ~ a rnm ~ g N ^ m °' c e N O 6 N 1~ W W O O ~ I m N O b O N N O N M ~I A N ~m o e o000 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a; a o000 00 ~ 0 M 0 o 0 S 0 e E a y5 o m o a vi o m m ui m o °o o g N a dS Vf ~ N 01 N N V ~ K ~ O 0C O O N O N i N N O U7 ~ /pi $ i O O N O ~ ~~ O~ T p '6 ~ Q ~ d ~ ° i o C N ~ d 0 $ o ~ n i ~ m N n O N m Y m C M d y ~ a ~ R mF ~ O c >• a~ cam ~ Q~ p ~ o000 ~ ~ O > w o ~o ~ ~ ~ _ v A ~ ~ ~ ~ `~ d' ~+ Q O ~` N 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 N d r ~° A uNi rv n r Q H~ 17 N ~ N O N C C N I O N Al N C N O 00 N O 0 m ~ ~ m m N O ~ U ~ m ^ N Z Z U' Z b < b m m ~ y Z Z Z Q O O O r A Z• W W W ~ o ~ fi ~ E g r 0 00 ¢ o E C7 o o == z ~ a ° .°- O ~ ~ QQ Q ~ N LL ~ /n N N K K K K W W W W N T J N T C W d d L W W W W LL 3 _ C LL LL LL Q O ~ Y _ ~ "' a ~ C 6 a J c C m > LL LL m U d d b $ ~ ° ~ E ' - ~ d e a ~ a ~ o m °a ~ u a m ;~ C O ~ U ~ O T C I m O ~ ~ N q m 6 ry Y' U m ry Q Z K Z Q LL' N o w R Y O ' N U ~ 9 m tN'l < rOi 0 ' ^ '" U J U ~ lL n o n m ~~ N P-17 m C E U U L C T U N M0 W C 0 V R ~ O 0 C ~ N Q ~ C M t0 ~ 'O C ~ O ~ ~ c ~ o ~ a n d Q a =c ~ 2 ~` `n.~'.®a ~i N m 17 I' ~ N N Y P O O p W O N n _' > ~ O 1~ F J N M ~ Y yCj o C O h ~~ ~ ry M at a 3 of 0 p NI O ~ ,C 6 o ~ m° 10 1 e n O ~p M O ~ ~ O m ~ m a ~ m ~ m b e m G Nf N m Q r O~ ~ C ~ c ai c .n W ~ Y .. ~ p r m F ~ m < m r ~ `m m > ~' ~1 tV p N b N (} ~ m ° ~ W e vi 0 d 0 m~ a a °o o y ~ c N OOi N ~ E C ttpppp C O y b O N O O C W Of N a M r N O ~ N m d C y r ~ r N d C II m N ~q? 9 p LL Q m u O m ~ ~, a ~ m a CmC Q v 3 E m J C i ~ U ~ ' C 0 '~ C m O o„ r ~: ~ m m CI d p ~ AlY m > W ~ 01 .~.~ m m d FIU Q W a m U $ o ~~ L H c _ p LL~ 3 £ =o a ¢° 5 a m G ~ $ W 3 9 ~ m ~p C C C N ~ m '0 m U ~ o p~ n~ m °y N V N fA '~' C r 0 E o y N ) W Q a 6 x E ~ = N a 9 O C m m C O 4! :_. N $ E 0 0 a _T X 9 ~~ U d '- a ~ N~ c y ~ v 2 ~ U ~ N N ~~ a-> C ~ da 0 3 0 0 m L N 0 C O 'd W ~ d ~ L ~E O ~ E o U ~a U ~ O d N m C L t n O ~ C m O E O "' ~ o N ~ C q M a 5 ~ m o U N O ~ ~ O N `1 d O_ T ~ ~ 9 p O 10 ~ o O j ~ ~ m S. " C9 C o n i. Y m d c C ° N m m H Q C ¢ m ~~ i Ql Q q a ~ i ~+ N~ O f ~ ~ n ~ I o o a m L q' ~~ N Y O m° ~I C ,r~ Y g W /y ~ i~ m O m E w w R Gl j 01 C 0 2 O C N c Q ~ N • M ~ O d O 0 N d Y- ` ~ u ~ a d N O V yYy 0 ~O M N d WW1 Y C YI N M W pP Y b b m N N ~O N N 1 =i e, ~ i ~ ui v N N i i A ~ '' ~y ~~ b b Qm b F a Z N W F W J Z V `u I Z m W N ! C7 `m e Q Q e O m J O ~ ~ hV N c' G Eu > I, m o c I ~ ~ _ ' ~ C ~~ c rn a a. rv o ~ ". O Y U ', _! t/~ N N 0 N n ~ c c d 0 0 N N h h m 0 Q W M n m ~i m m ao O O ~ ym ~ !I (O N r n Qs N m w °o °o, 0 0 o g °o 0 0 of m 0 a T N W U ~ m W ~ Q q LL d 0 Q Y a Z C Q ~ m ~ o C S N ~ ~ N O Q U c N r O 6 a m u ~ `m ~ E ~ E m U g f! a 0 A N d O a Q m N N N d e m° u a v b e m d Q m O N P-18 maw Q U ~ f' ~ `v o ~ o ai p g O 6 C a f 6 0 0 a 0 ~' m a N CC P O+ D A C- e b p yl W m b ri O a m a N W ~ N O C N m C M d m a ~ ~ ~ T 7 V K ~ t O C ~+ C7. R m 7 Q ~ >, C Y ~` f0 ._~ •7 M n O Q O O O O N N ~. r a d ~ C "f N N O A Ea mt r ¢3 0 mil o u of 5 a `o O O O 0 ~m O A U ~ N A H ° m~ 9~ N ~ ~ m m m ~~ d r $ ~- e m m 01 m I M I o m e m a N Y d M w C b C a U ~' W E E a ~ n N ~ _T H C O ~_ b O LL C Cm a m C T c w v J 0 0 a W m N O E Q U N O d A a m E 0 U Q~ p d ~ ~ LL ~ Q O ~ K a a a o_ d 0 rc STAFF REPORT ENGINEERLNG SERVICES DEPARTMENT Date: July 21, 2010 To: Chairman and Redevelopment Agency Members Jack Lam, AICP, Executive Director From: Mark A. Steuer, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer By: Joseph Stofa, Associate Engineer . jZANCxo CliCA1,40NGA Subject: APPROVAL TO AUTHORIZE THE ADVERTISING OF THE "NOTICE INVITING BIDS" FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER ELECTRICAL SERVICE REPLACEMENT AND STANDBY GENERATOR UPGRADE TO BE FUNDED FROM ACCOUNT NOS. 2513801-5603 AND 2513801-5650/1715513-0 RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Redevelopment Agency approve plans and specifications for the construction of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center Electrical Service Replacement and Standby Generator Upgrade and approve the attached resolution authorizing .the City Clerk to advertise the "Notice Inviting Bids". BACKGROUNDIANALYSIS The City of Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center Electrical Service Replacement and Standby Generator Upgrade scope of work shall include the installation of two (2) Emergency Standby Generators at the southeast corner of the north parking lot of City Hall, including all connections, upgrades and testing of the system to the existing City Hall electrical system to be activated at time of power failure. The Engineer's estimate for the project is $1,200,000. Legal advertising is scheduled for July 27, 2010 and August 3, 2010 with bid opening at 2:00 p.m. on Tuesday, August 31, 2010, unless extended by addendum. Respectfully submitted, .~...v ~'~''-~. r Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer MAS/JES P-20 Attachment P-21 City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Division Vicinity Map ~::1 PROJECT SITE ~, j ~,, ,., ~~. ~~ N W ~ ~ S Item: Title: P-22 RESOLUTION NO. i~n iQ-D I~ A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE "CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER ELECTRICAL SERVICE REPLACEMENT AND STANDBY GENERATOR UPGRADE" IN SAID CITYAND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS WHEREAS, it is the intention of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to construct certain improvements in the City cf Rancho Cucamonga. WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga has prepared plans and specifications for the construction of certain improvements. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED thatthe plans and specifications presented by the City of Rancho Cucamonga be and are hereby approved as the plans and specifications for "CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER ELECTRICAL SERVICE REPLACEMENT AND STANDBY GENERATOR UPGRADE". BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to advertise as required.by law for the receipt of sealed bids or proposals for doing the work specified in the aforesaid plans and specifications, which said advertisement shall be substantially in the following words and figures, to wit: "NOTICE INVITING SEALED BIDS OR PROPOSALS" Pursuant to a Resolution of the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency, Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County, California, directing this notice, NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that said City of Rancho Cucamonga will receive at the Office of the City Clerk in the offices of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, on or before the hour of 2:00 p.m. on Tuesday, August 31, 2010, sealed bids or proposals for the "CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER ELECTRICAL SERVICE REPLACEMENT AND STANDBY GENERATOR UPGRADE" in said City. A mandatory pre-bid meeting is scheduled for 2:00 p.m., Tuesday, August 17, 2010, at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California, in the Courtyard entrance to City Hall. Bids will be publicly opened and read in the office of the City Clerk, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. Bids must be made on a form provided for the purpose, addressed to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, marked, "Bid forConstruction ofCITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER ELECTRICAL SERVICE REPLACEMENT AND STANDBY GENERATOR UPGRADE." PREVAILING WAGE: Notice is hereby given that in accordance with the provisions of California Labor Code, Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Articles 1 and 2, the Contractor is required to pay not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for work of a similar character in the locality in which the public work is performed, and not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages P-23 RESOLUTION NO. July 21, 2010 Page 2 for holiday and overtime work. In that regard, the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations of the State of California is required to and has determined such general prevailing rates of per diem wages. Copies of such prevailing rates of per diem wages are on file in the office of the City Clerk, City of Rancho Cucamonga, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California, and are available to any interested party on request. They can also be found at www.dir.ca.oov/under the "Statistics and Research" Tab. The Contracting Agency also shall cause a copy of such determinations to be posted at the job site. Pursuant to provisions of Labor Code Section 1775, the Contractor shall forfeit, as penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, not more than ffty dollars ($50.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed for each calendarday or portion thereof, if such laborer, workman or mechanic is paid less than the general prevailing rate of wages herein before stipulated for any work done under the attached contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions of said Labor Code. Attention is directed to the provisions in Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 of the Labor Code concerning the employment of apprentices by the Contractor or any subcontractor under him. Section 1777.5, as amended, requires the Contractor or subcontractor employing tradesmen in any apprenticable occupation to apply to the joint apprenticeship committee nearest the s e of the public works project and which administers the apprenticeship program in that trade for a certificate of approval. The certificate will also fix the ratio of apprentices to joumeymen that will be used in the performance of the contract. The ratio of apprentices to joumeymen in such cases shall not be less than one to five except: A. When unemployment in the area of coverage by the joint apprenticeship committee has exceeded an average of 15 percent in the 90 days prior to the request of certificate, or B. When the number of apprentices in training in the area exceeds a ratio of one to five, or C. When the trade can show that it is replacing at least 1/30 of its membership through apprenticeship training on an annual basis statewide or locally, or D. When the Contractor provides evidence that he employs registered apprentices on all of his contracts on an annual average of not less than one apprentice to eightjourneymen. The Contractor is required to make contributions to funds established for the administration of apprenticeship programs if he employs registered apprentices orjourneymen in any apprenticable trade on such contracts and if other Contractors on the public works site are making such contributions. The Contractor and subcontractor under him shall comply with the requirements of Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 in the employment of apprentices. Information relative to apprenticeship standards, wage schedules, and other requirements maybe P-24 RESOLUTION NO. July 21, 2010 Page 3 obtained from the Director of Industrial Relations, ex-officio the Administratorof Apprenticeship, San Francisco, Califomia, or from the Division of Apprenticeship Standards and its branch offices. Eight (8) hours of labor shall constitute a legal day's work for all workmen employed in the execution of this contract and the Contractor and any subcontractor under him shall comply with and be governed by the laws of the State of California having to do with working hours as set forth in Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Article 3 of the Labor Code of the State of Califomia as amended. The Contractor shall forfeit, as a penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, twenty-five dollars 025.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed in the execution of the contract, by him or any subcontractor under him, upon any of the work herein before mentioned, for each calendar day during which said laborer, workman, or mechanic is required or permitted to labor more than eight (8) hours in violation of said Labor Code. Contractor agrees to pay travel and subsistence pay to each workman needed to execute the work required by this contract as such travel and subsistence payments are defined in the applicable collective bargaining agreement filed in accordance with Labor Code Section 17773.8. The bidder must submit with his proposal, cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bidder's bond, payable to the City of Rancho Cucamonga for an amount equal to at least 10% of the amount of said bid as a guarantee that the bidder wilt enter into the proposed contract if the same is awarded to him, and in event of failure to enter into such contract said cash, cashiers' check, certified check, or bond shall become the property of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. If the City of Rancho Cucamonga awards the contract to the next lowest bidder, the amount of the lowest bidder's security shall be applied by the City of Rancho Cucamonga to the difference between the low bid and the second lowest bid, and the surplus, if any shall be returned to the lowest bidder. The amount of the bond to be given to secure a faithful performance of the contract for said work shall be 100% of the contract price thereof, and an additional bond in an amount equal to 100% of the contract price for said work shall be given to secure the payment of claims for any materials or supplies furnished for the performance of the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, or any work or labor of any kind done thereon, and the Contractor will also be required to furnish a certificate that he carries compensation insurance covering his employees upon work to be done under contract which maybe entered into between him and the said City of Rancho Cucamonga for the construction of said work. Contractor shall possess any and all contractor licenses, in form and class as required by any and all applicable laws with respect to any and all of the work to be performed under this contract; including, but not limited to, a Class "A" License (General Engineering Contractor) in accordance with the provisions of the Contractors License Law (Califomia Business and Professions Code, Section 7000 et. seq.) and rules and regulation adopted pursuant thereto. The Contractor, pursuant to the "Califomia Business and Professions Code;' Section 7028.15, shall P-25 RESOLUTION NO. July 21, 2010 Page 4 indicate his or her State License Number on the bid, togetherwith the expiration date, and be signed by the Contractor declaring, under penalty of perjury, that the information being provided is true and correct. The work is to be done in accordance with the profiles, plans, and specifications of the City of Rancho Cucamonga on file in the Office of the City Clerk at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Copies of the plans and specifications, available at the office of the City Engineer, Plaza Level Engineering Counter, will be furnished upon application to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and payment of $35.00 (THIRTY-FIVE DOLLARS); said $35.00 (THIRTY-FIVE DOLLARS) is non- refundable. Upon written request by the bidder, copies of the plans and specifications will be mailed when said request is accompanied by payment stipulated above, together with an additional non- reimbursable payment of $15.00 (FIFTEEN DOLLARS) to cover the cost of mailing charges and overhead. The request for plans and specifications should include the title cf the requested project and bidder's business card, including valid mailing address, phone and fax number, and a-mail address. Please note that plans and specifications will not be processed, given out or mailed until payment is received, which shall include the cost of the plans and specifications and the stated mailing fee or bidder's FedEx account number, if applicable; until the information above is received. Checks/request shall be addressed as follows: City of Rancho Cucamonga Attention: Engineering Plaza Level 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 No proposal will be considered from a Contractor to whom a proposal form has not been issued by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The successful bidder will be required to enter into a contract satisfactory to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. In accordance with the requirements of Section 9-3.2 of the General Provisions, asset forth in the Plans and Specifications regarding the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, the Contractor may, upon the Contractor's request and at the Contractor's sole cost and expense, substitute authorized securities in lieu of monies withheld (performance retention). The City of Rancho Cucamonga, reserves the right to reject any or all bids. Questions regarding this Notice Inviting Bids for "CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER ELECTRICAL SERVICE REPLACEMENT AND STANDBY GENERATOR UPGRADE" may be directed to: P-26 RESOLUTION NO. Page 5 JOSEPH STOFA, ASSOCIATE ENGINEER AND PROJECT MANAGER 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909) 477-2740, ext. 4017 By order of the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Dated this 215tday of July, 2010. Publish Dates: July 27, 2010 and August 3, 2010 PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency, Rancho Cucamonga, California, this 2151 day of July, 2010. Donald J. Kurth, M.D., Cha ATTEST: Jack Lam, Secretary I, JACK LAM, SECRETARY of the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency, Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Califomia, at a regular meeting of said Redevelopment Agency held on the 215` day of July, 2010. Executed this 215` day of July, 2010, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Jack Lam, Secretary ADVERTISE ON: July 27, 2010 and August 3, 2010 Pages 27 & 28 not used. P-29 ai STAFF REPORT - REDEVELOP:~tENT ACGE':vCY / jZANCxo Date: July 21, 2010 cUCAMONGA To: Chairman and Members of the Redevelopment Agency Jack Lam, AICP, Executive Director From: Linda Daniels, Deputy City Manager Subject: APPROVAL TO MODIFY THE VICTORIA GARDENS PROMISSORY NOTE, ALLOWING FC VICTORIA GARDENS-C, INC. AND LC CUCAMONGA COMMERCIAL, ING. TO TRANSFER ALL OBLIGATIONS OF THE NOTE TO RM MEMBER, LLC. RECOMMENDATION; It is recommended that the Redevelopment Agency approve a modification to the Victoria Gardens Promissory Note, allowing FC Victoria Gardens-C, Inc. and LC Cucamonga Commercial, Inc. to transfer all obligations of the Note to RM Member, LLC. BAC KGROtlND/ANALYSIS: On December 16, 2009, the Redevelopment Agency approved a modification to the Terms cf a Promissory Note between the Agency and FC Victoria Gardens-C, Inc. and LC Cucamonga Commercial, Inc. (aka, Forest City and Lewis, developers of the Victoria Gardens Regional Town Center). At that time, representatives of FC Victoria Gardens-C, Inc. and LC Cucamonga Commercial, Inc. indicated that they may - at a later date - request a "re-assignment" of the Note to a newly named entity to satisfy the companies' tax requirements. That request has come forward and the entities desire to modify the Promissory Note to reflect the assignment of the new entity, RM Member, LLC. The Assighment, Assumption and Modification of the Promissory Note will effectively transfer all obligations of FC Victoria Gardens-C, Inc. and LC Cucamonga Commercial, Inc. (Assignor) to RM Member, LLC (Assignee). All terms of the Promissory Note, as modified on December 16, 2009, will remain the same and the Assignee will be obligated to fulfill the terms of the Note. Based on the ongoing partnership between the Agency/City and Forest City/Lewis, by which both entities work collaboratively for enhancements to Victoria Gardens, and due to the fact that the Assignee will maintain the same type of business relationship, staff recommends approval of this modification to the Promissory Note. Respectfully submitted, ,e ,`~~~ Li a. D. Daniels Deputy City Manager STAFF $~EI~®RT ENGINEERING SF_RVICLS DE'PAR'T :~fENT Date: July 21, 2010 To: Chairman and Redevelopment Agency Members Jack Lam, AICP, Executive Director From: Mark A. Steuer, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer ,9th By: Curt Billings, Associate Engineer Shelley Hayes, Assistant Engineer ~H- ~i` - RANCHO CUCAMONGA Subject: ACCEPT THE HAVEN AVENUE PAVEMENT REHABILITATION FROM 4T" STREET TO FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, CONTRACT NO. RA10-003 AS COMPLETE, RELEASE THE BONDS, ACCEPT A MAINTENANCE BOND, AND AUTHORIZE THE CITY ENGINEER TO FILE A NOTICE OF COMPLETION AND APPROVE THE FINAL CONTRACT AMOUNT OF $1,221,294.89 RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Rancho Cucamonga accept the Haven Avenue Pavement Rehabilitation from 4~" Street to Foothill Boulevard, Contract No. RA10- 003, as complete, authorize ±he City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion, release the Faithful Performance Bond, accept a Maintenance Bond, authorize the release of the Labor and Materials Bond in the amount of $1,197,794.00 six months after the recordation of said notice if no claims have been received and authorize the release of the retention in the amount of $122,129.49, 35 days after acceptance. Also, approve the final contract amount of $1,221,294.89. BACKGROUNDIANALYSIS The subject project has been completed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The Haven Avenue Pavement Rehabilitation from 4`" Street to Foothill Boulevard improvements scope of work consisted of the removing and replacing existing pavement, curb & gutter and sidewalk, cold planing, routing, crack sealing and dust blotter, installing asphalt concrete pavement, asphalt rubber overlay, striping, legends, pavement markers, and loops. Pertinent information of the project is as follows: - Budgeted Amount: Account Numbers: Engineer's Estimate: ,~ City Council Approval to Advertise: - Publish dates for local paper: - Bid Opening: - Contract Award Date: $1, 500,000.00 1 1 76303-58 5011 681 1 76-0, 1 1 90303-565011 35 51 90- 0, 266D801-565 0/1 35 5660-0 $1,415,945.00 February 17, 2010 February 23 and March 2, 2010 March 9, 2010 March 17, 2010 P-30 P-31 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY STAFF REPORT Re: Accept Haven Avenue Pavement Rehabilitation from 4°" Street to Foothill Blvd. July 21, 2010 Page 2 - Low Bidder: - Contract Amount: - 10% Contingency: - Final Contract Amount: - Difference in Contract Amount: R.J. Noble Company $1,197, 794.00 $119,779.40 $1,221,294.89 $23,500.89 (1.96%) The net increase in the total cost of the project is a result of three (3) Contract Change Orders including the Balancing Statement. The most notable change significant to the increase of the Contract amount was Contract Change Order No. 1 which installed base material along the shoulder of Haven Avenue where there was only edge of pavement. The Balancing Statement accounts far other minor increases and decreases in the project bid quantities. Respectfully submitted Mark euer Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer MAS/CB/SH:Is Attachments VICI~TI~~ IVIAI' ~~ ~~ HILLSI E ~l ~ ILSO AVE W "' j ~ BAN N ST _ aa~ \ a EMO ~ ~ VE ~~ 19TH T 30 ~~~ Q ~ N J W Y z ~ Cs ~ N • ~ B LINE D ~~~ ~ ~ ¢ CHU HST =O ~THILL BLVD m l < °-~ ¢ < U .- W ~ ¢ `6' ~ 105 ~ ~ ARROW ¢ ~ ¢ RTEa ~ ~ BROW W BNSF $ H ST 4TH ST J n. 0 r PROJECT P-32 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HAVEN AVENUE PAVEMENT REHABILITATION FROM 4TH STREET TO FOOTHILL BOULEVARD ~; N `~~ N.T.3. P-33 RESOLUTION NO. /~ J~ ~~~ 0~ / A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE HAVEN AVENUE PAVEMENT REHABILITATION FROM 4T" STREET TO FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, CONTRACT NO. RA10- Ob3 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the HAVEN AVENUE PAVEMENT REHABILITATION FROM 4T" STREET TO FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, Contract No. RA10-003, has been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. NOW, THEREFORE, the Redevelopment P,gency of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, hereby resolves that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. RANCHd CUCA114dNGA i<IRE YRdTECTION piSTRiCT P-34 A~~enda Check Re>Tister 6/30/2010 throueh 1/1320 J 0 Check No. Cteeck Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00298540, 711;2010 ADAPT C'ONSLILTING INC 557.00 AP - 00298548 7/Li2010 ALL CITIES TOOLS 63.00 AP-00298545 7/1/2010 ALL CITIES TOOLS 198.75 AP - 0029856E 7;1/2010 B.4UER COMPRESSORS 548.42 AP-00298564 7!U'?(110 [3ESTBEST.4NDKRIEGER 136.80 AP - 00298564 7/120!0 BEST BEST AND KRIEGER I?5.50 AP-00298$74 7!112010 CALIFORNG'1GENER4TOR 4AOQ(7 .4P - 00295577 7/120 f 0 CARQUEST AUTO PARTS 37.65 AP-00298577 7/1/2010 G+RQUF-.STATJTOPARTS I7.U0 .AP-00298598 7/1/2010 CLICAR4ONCiA VALLEY WATERDIS'[' 16,21393 AP-00298605 7%I/2010 DIA.MONDBACKFJRE~RESCUE 646.69 AP - 00298633 7/1/2010 U AND M BUSINESS fNTERIORS 650. f 1 AP - 00298613 7/12010 FIOSE MAN INC 19633 AF -00298677 7~I/2010 ICME FIRE APPARAT"tIS 3,639.96 r1P - 00298650 7/!/2010 LA W SON PRODClCTS tNC '390.13 AP - 00298689 7/1 /2010 MAGNIJSON, PETER 40.00 AP - 00298695 7i V20I0 MARIPOSA. !-IORT[CULTLfRAE. ENT [NC 7.,555.74 .4P - 00298695 7i l/2010 Rt'ARIPUSA HURTICLiLTCIR4L EN"C [NC 2,004.74 AP-00298701 7/f2Ui(J R4FDINA,BREANNA 69.00 .4P - 00298708 7!1!2010 NAPA AUTO PARTS 63.23. AP-00298715 7/1/2010 OFF[CEDEPOT 124.92 AP - 002987 LS 711!2010 OFFICE DEPOT 163.09 AP-00298741 7/0201.0 KARtBAL`D,BRET 3L95 AP - (103987.46 7i 112010 RBM LOCK AND KEY SERVICE 600.00 AP -00298748 7/12010 RELIABLE BUILDING SERVICES ti10.00 AP - 00298750 ?/1/2010 REPUBLIC STORAGE SYSTEMS LLC (,95.b0 AP - Q0298750 7/1/2010 REPUBLIC STORAGE SY"STER9S LLC 35 L52 AP-00298755 7/1!2010 ROSE,LORRAINE 119.61 AP - 00298756 7/1;2010 RRM DESIGN GKOUP 10,655.72 AP - 00298764 7(!/2010 SAN BERNARD[NO COUNTY 300-OU AP - 00298764 7112(1 10 SAN BERNARD[NO COUNTY" 280. (5 AP - 00298764 7!1,'2010 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY 3.25 AP - 00298764 7112010 SAN BERNARlllNO COUNTI' L926.00 AP - 00298773 7i 1!2010 SIGNCRAFTERS OF RANCHO CtICAMONGA I30.SU AP - 00298774 7/1 /2010 SO CALIF GAS CORdPANy 95.87 AP -00298774 7/I/2010 SO G1LtF GAS COMPANY 191.83 :LP - 00298774 7/120 t0 SU C:1LIF GAS CURtPANY 5232 AP-00298774 7JI/2010 SOCAL[FGASCUMpAlsty }40.82 AP-00295780 7(120!0 SOUTEIERNCALtFORMAEDISON 1,49132 AP-00298780 7!1/2010 SOU`£ItEIYNCAL[FORN[AEDISON I,772.7R AP - 0(1298780 7!1/2010 SOUTHERN OALIFORN[A EDISON 1,294-45 AP-00298783 7/1/2010 STAPLETON,JOS[IC1A 43.?b AP - 00298788 7,~U2010 SUNSET PR[NTFNG AND ADV SPEC CO (,292.32 AP-00298791 7/t/2(110 SUPREDtECORPORATION 545.45 AP-00298798 7/1/2010 l1NCFIRSTUNIFORMSEKVICE 48.10 AP-00298798 7/1/2010 UNiFIRSTUIJ[FORR4SERV[CE 48.50 .4P-00298806 ',/1(2010 USDA FORESTSERViCE 57Q00 AP-00298509 lit/2010 VALLEY POWER SYSTEMSFNC 90.39 AP - 00298809 7/t/20l0 VALLEY POWER SYSTEMS INC 7-55 AP-00298509 7/I/2010 VALLEYPOR'ERSYSTEb1SINC 2,099.82 AP-0029881> 7/1/2010 VERIZON WIRELESS-LA 380.78 AP -00298815 7/02010 VEk[ZON P/IRELESS - L A 41.-16 .4P-U029S8t> 711;2010 VERlZON WIRELESS-LA 689.40 AP-0029RS15 7;112010 VEREZON WIRELESS-LA 60.54 User:VLOPEZ-Veron ica Lopez Pave: 1 CurrentDaie: U?/14r2Ui Repot-i:CK_AGENDA_R F:G_PORTRAI T_RC - CK:.4gertda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 11:17:5 ILANCHO CUCAi9'EONC. A FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT P-35 Acenda Ctseck Re~icte_r 6.'30/2010 through 7113%3010 Check Nn. Check Date Vendor Naerre ~ Amount AP - 0029881> 7%1/2010 VERIZON Wl'RELESS - LA 7b.93 AP-00298815 7/I /2010 VEI2IZON WIRELESS-LA 34.7 AP-002988[5 7/1;?01CI VERIZONWTRELFSS-LA 86.47 AP-0029SSt7 7/1!20(0 VERIZON 476.28 AP-00298817 7/1/2010 VEKIZC)N 37.70 AP-00'2988!7 7/1/2010 VERIZC)N 3b.55 AP-00298817 7;1;20€0 VERLZON 36SS AP-00298$17 7!112010 VER€ZON SS.G2 AP-00^_98817 7i'l/20[0 VERF2,ON 4!6.28 AP-00298817 7/[12010 VER[ZON 476.28 AP-0029$817 7!112010 VERI7_ON 476.28 AP - (10298R24 7! 02010 WAXIE SANJ"I'ARY SUPPL:y 15432 A.P-0029$824 7i""112010 WAXIESAN`iTARYSUPPLy 154.31 AP-00298$24 7/1;2050 WAXIESANII'ARYSUPPLy 185.66 AP-0029$824 7r'Ir20t0 WAXIESANITARYSUppLy 217.00 AP - 00298824 7/1/2010 4VAXtE SANCE':1RY SUPPLY 92.R.i Ah-00298824 7/1/2010 WAX[ESANITARI'SUPPLy 122.97 AP - 00298824 '1. 112010 WAXIE SANtTARY SUPPLY 278.d9 AP-00298825 7/L/2010 WE?dGER,JEFF 100.00 AP-00298828 7/020!0 WEST ENDUN[FORTvtg 122.63 AP - 00298$41 7i'6~'2<110 DAPPER TIRE CO 9,943.5? AF'-002)8866 717!2010 CALKERS 5;145.00 AP-00298$611 7/7/2010 CALPI3RS 256.[4 AP-0039591.9 '7!720[0 RAYNEWATERCONDITFONLNGFNC 24.50 AP-00298957 7/7!2010 r~RROWSTAFF[NG 259.20 AP --{I{1293965 %'7!20 f 0 BELL, MICHAEL L. 608.00 AP - 00298969 7!"2010 BURTON'S FIRE INC 3,019.49 AP - 0029897C, 7/7,'2010 CLiINf7 \•iOWER AND F_NGINE SERV [CE 1.260.37 AP-00298977 7/7!20(0 CLOt~',FREL) ~2U.R6 AP - 00298978 7!7/2010 COME'AU, CHAD 260.00 AP - 00298988 7i?,'2010 DEI?AR'FMEN'i OF ['ORESTKY AND FIRE PROTE 6$.00 AP - 00298988 "'7/2010 DEPAR"CNEEN'T' OF FOKES'I-RY ANU EIRE PR.OTE 188.00 AP - 00298988 7/7;'2010 DEPARTMT3NT OF FOR.ES'CRY AND FIRE PRO'( & 288.00 AP - 00298989 7%7!2010 DF'PARTMT'NT OF'COXIC SC)E3STANCBS CON"CRS 207.10 AP - 00298999 7(7/20 (0 EPS'i'ElN, SN,4WN 759.00 AI' - 0029900 L 7/7/2010 FER.1tER; GABS 976.00 AP - 00299006 7/?/2010 FRANT{L,EIV TR[.fCK PART'S :1,839.92 AP-00299009 7,'7/2010 G.T. AUTOMOTIVE ECZUIPMENTCO, 150.00 AP-00299(112 7/7/2016 GENER-ALSFRV[CF.,SADM[N. 303.6Q AP-0029901.4 ?1'7;2010 CiRAFNGEK 521.42 AP-01)299024 7/7/2010 HOSE MAN INC 47.70 AP - 00299043 7!7'2010 LEA[, MICHAEL 180.00 AP-{11)299050 7/7!20[0 MARIPOSAF[ORTICULTURALENTfNC 65.75 AP-00299010 7!7!^_Ot0 MAR[POS.AHORT[CUL1'URALENT[1VC 1.778.$7 AP-(10299051 7/7!2010 MARL[NKSAfNC 135.00 AP-00299057 717/201.0 MCKESSONMEDICALSURGICAL 9F31 AP - 00299057 7!712010 ,MCKESSON MEDICAL SURGICAL 254.07 AP - 00299057 7/7!2010 MCKESSC}N MEDICAL SUKG[CAL 7635 A.P - 00299057 ?!7r"2010 MCKESSON MEDICAL 5URCi[CAL 25.0$ AP - 00299017 7!712010 MCKESSON MEDICAL S1112G[CAL 423.87 ,4P-00299063 7!""7/2010 NOREEN,ERICS. 1$9.15 AP - 00299064 7(7;2010 OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH CENTERS OF CAL[FO 53.50 AP - 00299066 7!7,'2010 OFFICE DEPOT 1,074.93 AP-0029906ti 7J7~?010 OFF[CEDEPOq' ll0.7~ Ciser. V"LOPE[- bermtica Lopez F'age: ~ Current Date: 07.14%20l Report:CK_AGENDA_ R.EG_POR"IRAE T'_RC - C'IC: Agenda Check Register Porn'ait Layout Tiute: 11:17:5 RANCHO CUCAMONC:A FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT P-36 Agenda Check Register Gi3012010 Qtrou,h 7/13!2010 Check No. 'Check Date VenAor Name AmoanE AP • 00299070 7!7Y2010 P:C'f"['ON SALES CORP 135.67 AP - 00299071 7!72010 PF SERVICES [NC 90.00 AP - (10299077 7172010 RASMUSSEN, STEVEN 700.00 AP -00299077 7/7/2010 RASMUSSEN, STEVF.,N 40.07 AP-002990R1 7!7,2010 RELlA13L.EGRAPHICS 162.90 AP -00249081 7/72010 RELIABLE GRAPHICS 70.39 AP - 002990SZ 7/72010 RELIABLE ICE EQUIPMENT INC 261.13 AP-00299088 7/72010 ROEDER,JEFF 125.00 AP-002990SR 7;712010 ROL"DER,IEFF 32.93 .4P - 00299091 7!7~20I0 SAFF,-ENTRY "TECHNICAL [NC 6G0.00 AP - 00299092 7/72010 SAN BERNARD[NO CO EA4S OFFICERS ASSOCU 60.00 AP - 002991)92 7i 72010 SAN BF..RNARD[IJO CO EMS OFFICERS ASSOC[A 30A0 AP - 00299100 7r'7/2010 51GNCRAF'fERS OF RANCHU CUCAMONGA 48.94 AP-00299102 717"2010 SMART AND FINAL (29.32 AP-0029!)102 717;2010 SMART.4NDFINAL 60.96 AP-00299F02 '172010 SMART ANDFIN,4L. 108.17 AP-00299102 7172010 SMART.4NDFIN.AL 21930 AP - 00299 i 03 '„'7,2010 SNIDER, LANCE 350.00 AP - 00299104 7!712010 SO CAL[r` GAS COMPANY 126.76 AP-00299104 7.'7'20f0 50 CALIF GAS COMPANY 82.15 AP - 00299104 7172010 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 3225 AP - 00299104 7/7/2010 SU CALIF GAS COMPANY f 26.75 AP - 002991(L 7;7/3010 SOUTHERN CALLFORN[A EDISON 836.97 AP - 002991 (I 7/7/2010 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ED[SON 1, (47 97 AP -00299111 7/7/2010 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GDISON 407.t3 AP - 04299125 7!7/2010 VERIZON 22.31 AP-00299(26 7/7,2010 VE[tIZON 2'_•31 AP-00^_99L30 7/7/2010 WENGER, IEFF 100.00 AP - 00299li0 7/7/2010 WL•;NGER, JEF`I' 175.00 AP-00299132 7;712010 WE5'TENDl1N1i'ORMS 60.50 AP-00299139 7/8/2010 .41R.GAS WE.iS`f _ ~5iS.09 Total for Check [D AP: !02,408.60 EP-OOOOIIRB 7,'1/2010 D<)141'NICK,SAM,CELA. 4,200.00 Total Yor Check ID EP: 4:200.00 'Cotal Cor F,ntie}: 106,608.(10 User: VLOPEZ-Veronica Lopez Pave: 3 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Regisier Portrait Layoui Current Date: 07{141201 Time: l L 17:5 d c O E U U L K T U V k ~ N ~ ~ ~ f6 C d £ O r U C 3 N w ~ N O o~ oM o. ~ ~p c 3 `~ o' LLaa U -~ ~j ar ~ 'ir'e r'}. ~ 4" '• ~U "~.e~~. 4. ~~. , 'v' > e W M .e° i i' O M o y, O ~~I o w g m ~ N N ~ N N b I ' O ° O n v N ~ N R I b N ' o ° o -i ~ i ~ I.. F I T r I ~ `O~ ~~ a° Y Q O 3 m 1O e o ~ 0 °° o o N N N N M N N m O n b m P m W n N M °m N O Omj ~ N b N ~ ~ b M g > 'yN' M w o ~ tp W ! n N b O 0 W N b b ~ N ~ M a- v a 1 N M b O m ~ ~ tp h O { r r ~ 9 C E m t c O LL C V T d d a_ ~ m .-. C ~ E V q t~ > 9 C i P~ a a. C yc W Uam m a R ~ U ~ H g= ~ V a ~ r° M C L d ~ ~ 31 d E N ~ mN G m an (%) L d U T ~ ~ O d adc ~Lo ~ ~ E N j p I ~ d > C «_ O _ a d d ~ ` L.. ~ O y N Ta T d d G O ~ p U N C a o ¢ E E , gi b w D G iy V pi d d L I N ~ N . . N C y r o d r E H a.~n N ~ O N ~y Oma ° c ~ ° r _U L N o dda v E c 0 o d o r~ c c o y d'3 > .d+i R o N r b m b E g5 N Di m ~ ~ dam of °m ~ =°~ f" I ri < o. b r d ~~ N NNd U d Y ` L . .. C ~ u Ada ~' ° m d w € ~ _T ~ N V N O d d O ~ Y ~ O _ w 6a C C S ' o a ` ^ '~ 1 m m a , d' t it c ~ > E _~ n e C I~ b N ~ L ,_ 9 i~ ° o a d > E ~ `d d W i v h L ^ 0 N O N C W OQ O ~ ' O L m o d li E- M 'm m p d ... ~ d- ~ 4 t l'¢ m c m ~`c T y d ~C in N d d j 6 > c I ! C U p U ~ L' q C = ~ y~~ m O x N aai ~ ' T i ~ d O E ~ p rc `° `a° q Y y 0 d N' w ~ ,m, > a ` ~~E '~ > ~ ° E ~ ~ U > Q W u . ¢ U P-37 w a ~ F K U O a >C O Ip C tt v o as O. g LL 0 0 0 0 N o r b N o m O O O c ~ m C o n ° d K ~' P-38 ~ a q ~ a ~ sr n'om' G~ S m N O m N O N T a d ~ N K O N w U W N Y d ~' m E o £ o ~ c o V C ~ N d f6 N O M a ~ d = °°~ ~ o 0 czar 0 ~ a 7 Y0 C n E m~ n~ L 0 e a N N ~ O 4 ~ N N I, N N OO O '. 0 t0 '. n A ~ t0 N i N N'' N ~ N O Oi I~ A 'I ~u m °m °c n d d N q C q m ~ o am! LL e H W N r H w>> T U m Y ~ ~ ~ W 4 q (~ 0 N Q Q J Q 9 ~ 0 A J v s 0 II ~ N c C d KILL i C o d a 1 C Iv I~ ,W a:~ ~ o i UI J tq O m w ri d N m Q A O a c ~ 6 V) 0 U d N T 'm a d a IL c e 0 m m m C N Q 9 N O w a K U W ry _O T ~ 0 6i t K o a ¢ a ~ a m O P 8 0 N m I a ' v S N " o~ O H N G N O N a S; a s: am m m S N 9~ o N m: ~ q ~ O m ~ ~ Y I 1O 17 W 8 m r N n e A Y V_ •~ w W C N d W O e m v o ~=' l4 N N U t 'ip Y ~ m ~ M p`. _o o c d o o ~ LL ~ r a° a° c.i N N n n N n h A T A N O n ~ iO m m 4 rv o ~ o „ N LO N a ~ o ro W mu a c d q Q m O 0 0 S Z O QLL_ U LL O ~ Y c Z ~ m' z m o E 2 y J Q C 7 ~ N U ~ Q O C Y d U O "~ a $ w o A } d y N u 0 O O m 9 Y E H v 9 m r M N U O f P-39 w a CL U o ~ _ a O LLI C ¢ O a a ~ d b C v 0 0 z' „~ao n C U b m LL ^ o F i a a o ~$ C a u g c ° o . a plb C C b N r ~ O O fC OI a C q V N ~Np N O (t OW W m O w w 1` N O h I 0 O O O C A O O' 0 ~ O ~'; O Oj O O' g O p N b C L 0 0~ O. O O O E a rci n g m n y$ $ $ o a m a° ~ ~ (J N Cl N N m O b~ O O N N S S O N Q q O Y1 YI O O O N r t o °o a m m m N ~ ° ° ~ w m V i 4 o m o a o W w O O Yi N W 1q ~ M d O O1 ~`"~ H C I d e 0 m ~ +' ~~ O cYb j ~ 0 0 ~ 0 • t > 30 ~ R a w . aW I i `~ $ LL ~+ Q N ~ ~ s O v a ~ sA N o ~o b~ o ~ C a 3 m m .n m g c u N w c q ~ 6 m r m c- W z r w o 0 b m LL N O 0 W m W T W ~ Z Z Z N m g F O m a LL Q W Q Z U ~ y LL W E w o E i o ~ a x z J J o ~ ¢ ° E ~ ~ N ~~ n N N J N N 2 W W m L p T Z ~W W b ~ J = J LL O ~ O _ ~ `. C a `c c ~ E ~ W ~ ~ ~ o O ~ N 0 r ~ C ~ O Q O W b O O f- a J N ® W C ~ H N ~ C U T O u z c o ' VU m Q ~ b Y ~ N Q ' ~ N ~ O W m. R _ O o K x o N d X LL O U J y 1 y ~ IL ~ ~ M n ' ~ ¢ P-41 State of California Pooled Money Investment Account Market Valuation 5/31 /2010 ~, ,~,:~~ t ,~-~. ~ ~'Carrymg4cos# Ptusy ~''~ ~ ." ~ ~~ `~ ~r ~ -~ ,~~ ~ `~ ~_ ~ ~`~'~ ` ~ `~~~~~ ~ ~ ;Accrued Interest .~ : ,~escrtpUon _,' Accrued lnteres# Purch mar-.., Faar Ualas United States Treasu Bills $ 27,619,020,600.68 $ 27,683,337,700.00 NA Notes $ 7,454,432,720.02 $ 7,496,749,OD0.00 $ 31,002,703.50 Federal A enc SBA $ 561,158,951.29 $ 554,711,275.66 $ 608,876.25 MBS-REMICs $ 692,696,D90.55 $ 737,403,230.98 $ 3.268,939.39 Debentures $ 1,107,816,421.13 $ 1,109,997,000.00 $ 12,019,591.02 Debentures FR $ 400,000,000.00 $ 400,102,000.OD $ 81,220.22 Discount Notes $ 4,922,917,260.94 $ 4,934,204,000.00 NA GNMA $ 74,246.79 $ 82,686.40 $ 734.25 IBRD Deb FR $ 3D0,000,000.00 $ 300,798,000.00 $ 162,234.00 CDs and YCDs FR $ - $ $ Bank Notes $ 500,000,000.00 $ 499,991,662.00 $ 90.138.89 CDs and YCDs $ 6,325,020,231.86 $ 6,324,504,691.50 $ 3,382,888.89 Commercial Pa er $ 7,617,116,027.54 $ 7,818,247,848.60 NA Cor orate: Bonds FR $ 125,119,550.90 $ 125,011,750.00 $ 67,771.91 Bonds $ - $ $ Repurchase A reements $ - $ - NA Reverse Repurchase $ - $ - $ Time De osits $ 4,054,640,000.00 $ 4,054,640,000.00 NA AB 55 & GF Loans $ 10,081,233,713.92 $ 10,081,233,713.92 NA TOTAL $ 71,961,245,815.62 $ 72,121,014,559.06 $ 50,685,098.32 Fair Value Including Accrued Interest $ 72,171,699,657.38 Repurchase Agreements, Time Deposits, AB 55 & General Fund loans, and Reverse Repurchase agreements are carried at portfolio book value (carrying cost). Pages 42 & 43 not used. ~JTAFF 1ZEPORT F PUBLIC WORKS SERVICES DEPARTbfENT ~ : ~, - -~.r Date: July 21, 2010 RANCHO To: Mayor and Members of the City Council ~;UCAMONGA President and Members of the Board of Directors Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager From: William Wittkopf, Public Works Services Director Mike Bell, Fire Chief By: Ty Quaintance, Facilities Superintendent - Julie Ungashick, Management Analyst II Janet Walker, Management Analyst II Subject: APPROVE AND AUTHORIZE EMCOR SERVICE/MESA ENERGY SYSTEMS, INC. (EMCOR SERVICE) TO CONTINUE AS THE SINGLE SOURCE SERVICE PROVIDER AND INSTALLER FOR HVAC/CONTROL WORK AND RELATED ENERGY MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS FOR CITY AND FIRE DISTRICT FACILITIES AT THE SAME RATES AS FISCAL YEAR 2009-2010 IN THE AMOUNT OF $215,767 FOR CITY FACILITIES AND $22,640 FOR FIRE DISTRICT FACILITIES FOR ANNUAL MAINTENANCE; APPROVE EXTRA REPAIR WORK FOR CITY FACILITIES NOT TO EXCEED $200,000; AND PERFORM INDOOR AIR QUALITY MODIFICATIONS AS NEEDED AT CITY-WIDE FACILITIES NOT TO EXCEED $10,000; TO BE FUNDED FROM 1001312-5304, 1025001-5304, 1700201-5304, 3281511-5300, 3281512-5300, 3281513-5300, 3281514-5300, 3281515-5300, 3281527-5300 AND 3283516-5300 RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council and Fire Board approve and authorize EMCOR Service/Mesa Energy Systems, Inc. (EMCOR Service) to continue as the single source service provider and installer for HVAC/control work and related energy management systems for city and fire district facilities at the same rates as fiscal year 2009-2010 in the amount of $215,767 for city facilities and $22,640 for fire district facilities for annual maintenance; approve extra repair work not to exceed $200,000 for city facilities and perform indoor air quality modifications as needed at city-wide facilities not to exceed $10,000; to be funded from 1001312-5304, 1025001-5304, 1700201-5304, 3281511-5300, 3281512-5300, 3281513-5300, 3281514-5300,3281515-5300,3281527-5300 and 3283516-5300. BACKGROUND ANALYSIS In August 2003, City Council approved EMCOR Service as the single source provider of HVAC services for City facilities. Due to their extensive knowledge of our systems, their work on integration for the Citywide Facilities, the addition of the Fire Stations under HVAC contract, EMCOR is uniquely qualified to remain as the single source vendor for HVAC and related Energy Management Systems. During fiscal year 2009-2010, staff completed a comprehensive inventory and currently is the process of preparing bid specifications. It is projected this contract will be ready to bi y January 2011. Res a ully s miffed, ~~~,~ ~u~~/Gy ~~~,~j ~(d - f ~ ` ~~ ~~/ ~/~ ~~ William Wittkopf, Public orks Services Director Mi e B I, Fire C i f P-44 1 _`~' ~`il:'' VWJ:TQ/ju CI'CY OF RANCHO CUC.~1410NGA P-45 Agenda C[> eck Reti.4ter 6 /3 012 0 1 0 ihrou<~h 7/13/2010 Check No. Cheek Date , Vender !tame Amaunt AP - 00398542 ?; 02010 A AND S BUS COMPANY ;75.00 AP - 00298542 7:'12010 .A AND 13 SUS COMP:\NY 387.,50 rlP-00298543 7/t/20[0 ASUIUDEI{FAMILYRCVLiVTRUST 383.20 4P - 00298543 71!20(0 ARUJUDEH F,AM14[LY REV LIV TRCIST 3'-!„ {3 AP - 00293544 7'!!2010 ACADEMY OF MUSIC 1,Ci35.20 ~AP-00298545 lit/2010 .4CTIONAWARDSENC. 1,(01.47 AP-00293547 7/V2010 AGCJ{LERA,{5AlAH 86.67 AP-00298547 7/1;'26(0 AGtJ{LERA, ISAGIH ~ 86.67 AI'-00298547 7/1/2010 AGU[LER,A,ISAIAH 86.6b AP-00298547 7!1120(0 .4GUILERA,tSAIA{i 86.66 AP - 00298547 • 7/1/2010 AGUILF..RA, ISAIAH 8b.67 .4P-00298547 7/1/2010 rlGLl[LERA,[SA1AH 86.67 AP-x0298548 7/1/2010 ALLCITIES'f'OOC.S 244.58 AF - 00298548 7!1/2010 ALL CITIES T'UOLS 94.6t AP - 00298549 7;1/2010 A.C-L 4VF4'I'EFER. RUOF[NG 7,$00.00 .4P-00295>5(I 7it/2010 ALLS'i-ARAI.R.CUNDII'-IC1N[NGLk.HEATING 9,6UO.U0 AP-00298552 7~U2U70 AMERICAN RO"GARY I3RC)OMCO. tNC. 38130 Af' - 00298553 7/ir20t0 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES 6.70 AP - 00278554 7/12070 A12CI{NE MANP,GEA9Et:T SERVICES iNC 689.F,0 AP - 00298555 Ill/2010 ARNOLD FIELDS PAINTING 50.00 AP-00298586 Ill/2010 ASAP POWERSPURT:S 280.00 AP-(10298556 7,'1/2010 ASAP POWERSPORTS 642.25 AP - 00298557 "7'Ei3070 AUTO AND RV SPECIALISTS INC. 94.31 AP - CF0293558 7i l20 f0 SAI,DY FIILE AND SAFETY 170.82 AP - 00298560 7!02610 I3ARN'ES AND NOBLE 170.33 .4P - 00298560 7%1!2010 BARNES :AND NOBLE 52.93 AP - 00298562 ?/02010 BEACON PLUA4B1NrG 360.00 AP - 00298563 7/12010 E3ERT'GES, RUTH 154.00 AP - 00298565 7i 1 %2010 B tSHC)P COMP,4Nl= L U 14.fi9 ,4P-{)0298565 71!(2010 BtSHOPCOMPANY 158.82 AP-00298566 7(t/20IU SOL,LYbPO<}D STEPPRODUCTt(JNS - 1,000.00 AP-00348567 7/1120!0 BR.OWN,.[EiNNIFER 360.00 AP-00248568 7102010 SUTSKO UTiC,IT'Y DESIGN tNC. •4,493A1 AP - 00298569 7i'f /2010 CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE 'FAX BOARD 25.00 AP - 0629857U 7/1/2010 CAL[FC)RNLA 1RANCHISE TAX BOARD ''-7 23 AP-00298571 7/1/2070 CA'L,IFORNLAFRANCi1LSET'AXBOARD 50.00 AP-00298572 7/12010 CALIFORNIAFRANCL-[ISETAXBOARD 33183 AP - 00298573 7/t/2010 CAC.[FORNLA FRANCHISE TAX SOARp 150.00 AP - 00298575 711/2010 CALIFOR.N[A VINYL FENCE CO. 1,080.00 AP-00298575 7/1/2010 C.ALfFORN1AV[NY7..FENCECO. 864.00 AP-00298576 7/120!0 C'ANYONAIi:SERVICEINC. 5,880.00 AP-00298578 7/1/2010 CARTESE,GINA 85.00 AP - 00298579 7%11201(! Cr\RTY, DtAIv~ 90.00 AP-00298579 7'02010 CARTY,DL4NE 652.80 AP - 00298580 '!120!0 CASTILLO, FRANC 3CiU.90 AP - 00298581 7'1120 f 0 CCPC).A REGISTP.ATION-STEVE MCCOY 450.00 AP-00298582 71[2610 CDW-G 1?12.71 AP_t}0298582 7~U2OlU CDVJ-C; 18~L75 AP-00298583 7/1;2010 C:ERV.ANTES.LINDA 38.00 AP -1)0298584 71l/2010 CHICAGO TITLE !•000.00 AP - 00298584 7.02010 ClI[(:AGO TITLE 1,000.00 AP-00298585 7/1120!0 CH[LDSUPPORTENFORCEMEN"CDIVtSION 175.00 .4P-00298586 7rl/2010 CH7LTON,GABRIELl.E 480.00 AP - 00248587 7!12010 CLASSY, SANDRA 1,000.00 Eller. VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 1 Carrent [late: 07/1420 t Report:CK_AGENDA_ REG_POR7'R A[ T_RC; - C'k: Agenda Check Register Pork<tit Layout Time: t 1:73:1 CITY OF KANCFIO CIJCAMONGA P-46 Agenda Chec4: Reaicter 6; +0%3010 through ?!1312010 Check Nu. Check Date Vendor Namr Amount AP - 00298588 7,'"020 L0 CLARK, [CAREN 71 L(10 AP - 00298589 ?/t/20 fU CL[MA'[ fC: F3UiLDFNG TECi-INOLOGIES GRUUP 385.00 .4P-00298590 ?r 1,'2010 COLTONTt:UCtiSUPPLY 38.55 Af-00298591 7/120(0 COM[3iNEUMARTIALSCIENC6[NC 2,706.90 AP - 00298592 7i020t0 CONCEP"I' POWDER. CUA'1'FNG 960,00 AP - 0(1298592 7/i 2010 CONCEP'T' PO W'DER COATING 200.00 AP - (1029859; 7!02010 CONTINENTAL. AMF;RICAN INSIIRANCE COMPt 115.97 AP - 00298593 7/1!2010 CONTINENTAL AMERiC.4N INSUKANCE COMPt IC,.39 r\P - 00298594 7r'Ih_010 CROP PRODUCTION SERVICES (NC 135.6? ,4I' - 00298594 ?r'L'2010 CROP PRODUCTION SF..RVICES fNC 77S.41 AP - 00298594 ?!I 12010 CROP PRODUCTION SL-,RVICES INC 1,187.75 AP-00298597 7!1/2010 CUCAMONGAVALL.EYW'ATERDISTR.ICT 3,715.39 AP-U029S597 7%1/2010 CCICAtvTGNGA VALLEY 1VATER D15"CRICT 2,356.04 AP - 00298197 7/02010 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DLS'fRICT' 506.08 AP - 0029859? 7%12010 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DIS`fRiCT 647.33 AP - 00298197 7;1!2(110 C'CICAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 8657 AP-0029$597 7112010 CiJCAMONG:1 VALLEY W'ATERDISTRIC'f 212.15 AP-0(1298597 9!1/2010 C[JCAMONUAVAL,LEYWATERDISTR[CT 4,948.28 AP -00298597 7%1/2010 CUCAMUNGA VAL LEY 1VATEIt DISTRICT 565?7 .4P-00298597 7/1/2010 CUCAMONGAV.4LLF_YR%A'fERDIS"fR.[CT 553.76 AP - 00298597 7%02010 CUCAMONGA VALLEY- RrATER D[S'fRICT 35.32 AP - 002/8597 7. i/2010 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT ! 3550 AP - 00298197 7/02010 CUCAMUNGA VALLEY" WATER DISTRICT 645.97 AP - 00298597 ?rI2010 CUGiMON'GA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 968.9? .4P - 00298597 7i (2010 CUCAMONGA VALLEY W:1TER DiST'RiCT SS.l4 AP - 00298597 ''i%2010 CCiCAbtONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 778.49 AP-00298597 7!0"_'010 CUCAMONGAVALLE!`W'ATERDiSTR1CT 85854 AP - 0029S197 7.02010 CUCAMONGA VALLL-.Y' WATER D[STR[C'f 30.73 AP - 00298597 7!120(0 CUC;AMONCiA VALLEY WATER DiS'CKICT 37.76 AP - 0(1298597 7;1:2010 Cl1CAM<1NGA VAL.L.EY WAT'kIt. [:)ISTRICT 124.40 AY - 00298597 711%20(0 CIJCAMONGA VALLEY W'A'I-ER DISTRICT 78.82 AP-00298597 7%1120(0 CUCAb10NGAVALLEYW.A'L'EKDISTR[CT 82.14 AP - 00298597 7; 02010 C[JCAMONGA VALi_El' WATER DISTRICT 124.40 AP - 00298597 %%02010 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER UIS'fRICT 88.76 AP - OU298>97 ?/02010 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER D[STKICT 81.16 AP-00298597 7/!!2010 CUCAR90NGA VALLEY WATEKDISTRIC"f IA2.67 .4P-00298597 7!1/2010 CUCAMONGAVALLEI'WATERD1STKlCT 36.68 AP - 00298597 7r' V20I0 CUCAMONGA VALLEY W%AT'ER DISTRICT 115.81 AP - 00293597 7i 112010 CUC.AMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTK[Cf 1;267 ~9 AP - 00298597 7%1201 U CCICAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,553.88 AP -00298197 7/1!2010 CUCAMUNGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 296.45 AP - 00298597 7%1/2010 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 146.33 AP - 00298597 7%t%2010 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DTSTK[C'f 234.81 AP - 00298597 ?/t/2010 CUCA<,40NGA VALLEY WATER. DISTRICT' 4219 AP-OU29S597 7/1!20[0 CUCAD4UNGA VALLEY WATERD[STKIC"C 37.53 AP-00298597 711/2010 CUCAMUNGAb'ALLEYWATERDISTRiCT 103.03 AP - 00298597 7/1/2010 CUC.AMONGA VALLEY WATER DtSTRLCT 65.80 AP - 00298597 7.'(/2010 C(1C,AMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 3.(164.71 AP-00298597 '%1120!0 Cl1CAMONGAVALLEYW'ATEKDCSTRiCT 792.56 AP-00298197 7!!2010 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DfSTRiCT ~ 2,409.01 AP - 00295597 '!1!20[0 CUCAMONGA V"ALLEY WATER DISTRICT 433.30 AP - 00298197 7/1/2010 CLlCAMONGri VALLEY \i'ATER DISTRICT 766.90 AP-(10398597 %'1;2010 CCICAMONGAVALLEYWATERDISTRTCT 648.66 AP-00'29819? 7!I/2U 1.0 CUCAMONG.4VALLEYWATERDiSTRICT 1,368.34 User. VLOPEZ - \ eronica Lopez L'age. 2 Curteut Date: 07r 14,201 Rrport:CK_ACiENDA_REG _PORT'RAC f_KC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 11:13:5 C['C1' CIR FL41!'CHO CLCAMONGA P-47 Agenda Chec[c Re gister 6/3 0/2010 through 7/I3r2010 Check Nu. Check Date Vendur Name Amaant AP-00298597 7rl/2q 10 CLfCAMONGA Vr1LLEYWATF_R UISTRICT 4,57246 AP-00298597 7!L/2010 CLICAM,ONGA VAL,LEYWATER DCSTR[CT' 2,330.76 AP-(1029$597 7!1;2030 CttCAMONGA VALLEYW%ATER DISTR[CT 296.72 AP -00298597 7/112(110 CUCA1tfONGA VALLEY WATER D1STR[C'I' 1,087.98 AP -0(1298597 71FJ2010 CCIC:AMONGA VALLEY WA'CER DtSTR[C-C I,03(1.t3 AP -00298,97 7,'1i20Tq CL]CAMONGA VALLEY R%ATER D1S'CRIC`C 16$.13 AP-00298597 7/1!20tU CLICAM(7NGA VALLF_YWA'I'EK BFST'RiC"I' 168.12 AP-00298597 7/1!2010 CLK:ANIONGA VALL,EyW'ATER DISTRICT 4,821.46 AP-0029$597 7/1%2010 CUCAtvtONGA V,4LLEYWATER DISTR(CT 17,20L2L AP-00298597 7!1!2010 CUCA(t4ON`GA VALLEY WATER DIS'1'RtC"t' 89.64 AP-00298597 7,''1/201.0 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER D[STRICT 48.83 AP - g029S597 7;1 /1.010 CLiCAMONGA VALLEY W'A1"ER DCSTRICT 19.12 AP-DO^_98597 7!112010 CUC~AMONGA VALLEYWATr.R DISTRICT 23.92 AP - 00298597 7!Ir2010 CUCAMONGA VALF..EY W'A'TER D[S'CR.ICI' 691.15 AP-00298597 7/V20I0 CUCA.MONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 36.80 AP - 00298597 7/1/2010 CU'CAM,ONGA VALLEY WATER DIS'C}Z[CT 4(13.54 A.P-00298597 7/[/2010 <:.UCAMONGA VALGEY WATER Df,S'iR(CT 32$.74 ,4F'-00298597 7/1/2010 CUCAMONGA VALL,EYWATER BISTRICT 128.22 AP-00298597 7!1!20 E0 CUCG„s<ONv^A VALLEY'3JATER DISTRICT 855.12 AP - 00298597 7/1!2010 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER BIS'CR[CT 137.99 AP - 00295597 7'1!20 (fl CUCAMONG:4 VALLEY WATER BISTRICT 61.23 AP-OD293597 7/1/2010 CUCAR-tONGA VALLEYWATER DESTRICT 74.30 AP - 00295597 7, t; 2010 CUCAIv[ONGA VALLEY WATER B[STRIC:T' 135.32 AP - 00398597 7!02010 CLJCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTR(CT 46.69 AP-00298597 7/U^_Ot0 CUCAMONGA VALLEYWATER DISTRICT ZS.03 AP-00295597 7/1/2010 CUC:AMONGA VALLEY'WATER pISTFLICT 37.76 AP - 00298597 7/1/2010 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WAT"ER DISTRICT 30.74 AP - 00298597 7; 112010 CCICAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 48.97 AP - Dg29R597 7/1/20(0 CUC.4R4ONGA VALLEY W'A'I'L"R BISTRICT 337.35 AP-00298597 7!(/'LOIfl CUCAMONUA VALLEY VJA7Eft BIS"CRICT (16.69 AP-00298597 7!F;~01(J CUCAMONGA VALLEYWATER BISTRtCT 53(4.44 ,4P-00298597 7/t/2gIU CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER BtST'RLC"C 2,356.74 AP-00298:±97 7!1;2010 CLECAMONGA VALI..EYWATER DISTRICT 3334 r1P-00298597 7/1/2010 CUCAMONCiA VALLEY W'A"CE.R DISTRICT 1,844.06 AP-00298597 7/1/2(110 CtJCAA9ONGA VALLEY W'AT'ER DISTRICT' 1,4[9.71 AP-00298597 7;'112010 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER UIST"R[CT <'F3.80 AP-00298597 7(1;2DI0 CUCAMONGA V:ILC..FYW'A1'ER BISTRIC'C I(ifi.SR AP -00298597 711.!2010 C'UCAMONGA VALLEY WATER BISTRICT 2,163.06 AP-00298597 7/1!2010 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WA'1'ER BISTRICC 2,422.56 AP-00298597 7!1/2010 CUC.4MONG.4 VALLBYWA"CER B€S'CRICT 83.85 AP-D029RS97 7!'1!2010 <:UCAMONGA VALLEY W'A'CER D[S'CRICT 1,924.62 AP-00298597 7/1/2010 CUCAMONGA VALL,E-Y W.ATE-K DISTRICT 2,C12S.57 AP-00298597 7%1(2010 CUCAMONGA VALLEYWA'CER DISTR(CT 0,46.73 AP - 00298597 7r`1(2Dt0 CUCAMONCGA VALLEY WATER UISTRICT 165.61 AP - 00295597 7/1/2010 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WA"CER DIS'CR[CC 74.70 AP-00298597 7!1;'2010 CUCAb1ONGA VALLEYWATF.,R BISTRICT 2,(03.60 AP-00298597 7!1;2010 CLiCAMONGA V.4LLEYLVA"t'F_R BISTR[CI' 362D AP - 00298597 7! 1/2010 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 826.59 AP-00298597 7.!1/2010 CUCAMONC*A VALL.EY WATER UISTRICT 424.64 AP - 00298597 7i 1.!2090 CUCI,4MONG.4 VALLE}( WATER B[S1RFC"L' 1,455.57 AP -00298597 7(1;20[0 CUCAMON<1A VALLEY WATER BISTRICT 113.04 AP-00248597 7'Er~0iU CUCANIONGA VALLEYW'ATER UISTKICT 65.68 AP-04298597 7!1/201(1 CUCAMONGA VALL,E-YWA'CER DISTRICT 1,!91.65 AP-00298597 7!VZOiq CLJCA<v4ONGA 1%ALLEY WATER DLSTRICT 100.43 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lop.z Page: 3 <:urrent Date: 07;14 201 Report:CK_AGL~.NDA_ REG_PORTR 1[T _RC - CK: Agen da Check Regrster Portrait Layout Tirtte: 11: f 3:5 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P-48 Agenda Check Reffister ti!30i2010 through 7!13/2010 Check No. Check Dste Vendor Name Amoant AP - 00293599 7/1/2010 D 3 EQUIPA4ENT 85.12 AP - 00298600 7/1!2010 DAGHDEVIRL4N, KATHY 489.00 AP - 00298601 7/1;2010 DANCE DYNAMICS 10, 186.50 .4P-00298602 7/1/2010 DANCE TERRIFIC ?140.05 AP-00298603 7/1;2010 U:IWSONSURVEYINGINC. 3,93UA0 AP-0029SG04 711/20(0 DL'MCOINC 973.53 AP-0029860E 7(1/2010 DOGS ETC. 292.00 AP - 00298607 7!1/2010 URACHAND, DF ANNE 240.00 AP - 00298608 7/!!2010 URAD4ATIC PL(BLISH[NG ~ 15.40 AP-00298E09 7/1/2010 L)UFFY, RICK 3,043.25 AP-00298610 7i 1/2010 DUNNEDWARDSCORPORA'FION E3.48 .4P - (102936(() 7! V2010 DIJNN EDW'ARDS CORPORAT'lON ('_3.59 AP-U0298E1q 7i11?0E0 UUNN EDWARUSC«RPCRATION 162.46 AP-0029RE11 7.l/2U 10 E7UN~N,ANNEM.4RIE 230.(JO AP - 0029861 l 7/1/2010 DUNN', ANNE t1ARIE 1,462.80 AF' - 00298(1 { l 7/12010 Dt1NN, ANNE M.4RIF, 129.60 AP-00298(1(2 7r'1/20f0 DURKEL,CAROL 6550 AP - (t0?98612 7/12010 DURK.EL, CAEiOIv 95.00 AP-!0_98512 7!!!^_U l0 DURF~EL:CARCL ?3.50 AP - 00298612 7/12010 DURKEL, CAkOL 68.50 AP-00298613 7/U?OIO EDFUND 146.18 AP-00298E L4 711/Z010 EF[[NC 6,SOOA0 AP - 00298615 NL/2010 EIGHTH AVENUE ENTERPRISE LLC 157.47 AP-00298616 7/1/2010 ELLISENTERPR[SES 50.00 AP-00298616 71120}0 ELLLSENTERPRFSES 330.00 AP - 00298E 16 7/1!2010 ELLIS ENTERPRISES 75.00 AP - 00298616 7/IY'O10 ELLIS ENTERPRISES 50.00 AP-00298616 7!(/201(1 ELLISENTERPR[SES 110.00 AP - 00298617 77120(0 ENftIQUEZ, CAROL'L. 1,970.00 AP - 00298<i 18 7i 1/2010 ESGIL CORPOkATION .3,800.00 ,4P-00298619 7,'1/2010 L'WINCiIkkEGAT[ONPRODUCTS 234.87 A;P-002986(9 7/1/'1010 F.,WINGIRRIGATK)NPRODUCTS 1,115.78 AP-00298619 7/I/20(0 EWINGIRRIGA'FEONPRODUC"l'S L,115.78 AP-60298619 771/2010 EWINGIRRIGA:f[ONPROD(JCTS 357.03 AP-00298619 7/12010 ER~[NG IRR[GA"LION PRUUCICT'S 1,115.78 A'P-00298620 7/1/2010 EXCC.USiVEEMAGES 19.58 .4P - 00298621 7/1/2010 E ~ACFORCO C;O "FR4FFIC OPERATIONS ENC 3,3!,6.92 AP - 00298622 7/12010 FEDERAL EXPRESS COkP 49.80 AP - 00298623 7/1/2010 FEL[CIANO, ANTHONY 1,209.00 - AP - 00298624 7/1/2010 F(DELi1'Y NATIONAL TITLE CU. SO.UO .4P - 00298625 ',/1!2010 FIERRO, ALEX 179.67 AP - 0029852E 7/1/2010 FLAU SYSTEMS INC. 1,550.00 .4Y - 00298627 7,12010 FLOURNOY, llIANE 50.00 AP - 00248628 7/t/2010 FORD OF UPLAND INC 36.44 AP - 00298628 7,'ll2010 FORD OF UPLAND [NC 879.',3 AP - 00298629 7/02010 FOREMOST S[LKSCREE.N AND EMBROLDERY 2,424.53 AP - 00298530 7/ l/201 U FUX CROFT FARMS ?,956.60 AP - 00298611 711,^_010 FRAZEE PAINT CENTER 59:24 AP - 00298631 7!1;2010 FRAZEE PANT CENTER 5438 AP - 00298631 711 /2010 FRAZEE PAINT CENTER R59.2S .4P - 00298632 7/12010 FUTURE LIGHTING 4,358.00 AP - 00298634 7/L'2010 GARCEA, V[VIAN 26.00 AP-00298635 7/!20[0 CiEMPLERSENC 457.46 AP-00298636 7/l/2010 GENTkY,DONALDA 5,834.50 lJser. VLOPF,Z-~~ronicaLopez Pale: 4 CnnentUate: 07/14/201 Report:Cli_AGENDA_ REG_PORTRA[' ['_RC - CK: AL;enda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 11:13:5 CT'CY EDP' RANCf~IO CIJCA1440NGA P-49 A~entla Clteck Re2istzr 6/30%2010 through 7i 13/3014 Check Na. Check Dafe Vendor (Name Amount AP - 00298636 7! 1;2010 GBNTRY, DUNALD A 32fi.Z$ AP - 00295638 71//20 t0 GILKEY, KATHLEEN 200.06 AP-U0298Cr39 7/1!2010 GILL-ISON,.tOPIN X6.60 AP-00295640 7702010 G1ORD.4NO,MARIANNA 255.00 AP - 0029864 t 7/1(2616 GONZAL.ES, LORENA 88.40 .4P - 00295642 7/i!~010 GOODWILL OF SOi.JTHBRN CALdF 223.>0 AP-40398643 7%1/ZOEO CiOREE,REGINA 206.50 AP-60295644 7/i/2010 GRAINGER. 213.'6 AP-00298644 7!t{ZOtU .GRAINGER 168.54 AP-00^<95644 7/ti7.410 GRACNGLR 153.61 AP - 00298644 7;1!2010 GRAINGER -42.90 AP-00295644 7,'1/2010 GftA1NCiER EGI.50 AP-00298644 7;Ii2016 GRAINGER 66.67 AP-40295643 7/1i261C1 CiRA1NCiE:R 68.76 AP-00298644 7,`i/2Ut6 GRAINGER 33.05 AF-04295544 7i}!20[0 GRAINGER 237.11 AP-00298644 7'[/2010 GRAINGER (33.50 .4P-00295644 7/1;2010 GRAINGER 3959 ?.P-60298644 71ii20t4 G~4[NGEEt ~ 39.06 AP-04298644 7,'I/20(0 GRAENGER 99.18 AP-00298644 7iIM_OSO GR.4[NGER 9.00 AP - U029S544 7;'t/2010 GRAINGER 67.47 :4P-04298ti44 7!Ii2Ul0 GRAINGER 55.66 AP-00298644 7//!2010 GRAJNGER '61.91 AP-00298645 7/1/2010 GRANTIIC,V(NCEN'P 86.67 AP -00293645 7/i!2010 GRANT [1I, V(NCENT 56.66 AP-00298645 7/f/^_UIO GRANT^I,VCNCENT SG.bb .4P - U02ng645 7;1!2010 GRANT III, VINCENT 86.67 AP-00295645 7/O2i)10 GKANTCLLV[NCENT S6.C7 AF - 00293645 7/i/2016 GRANT IIt, VINCENT 86.67 .AP-00295646 7/ti'_Ot0 GRAPHICS FACTORY PRINTING INC. (SO.R9 AP - 00298645 7!'1/2010 GRAPHICS FACTORY PRINTING INC. 150.39 AP - 40295646 7/020!0 GRAPHICS FACTORY PRINTINti INC. 25.56 AP - 00298b45 7/I/2010 .GRAPHICS FACTORY PRINTING [NC. 150.89 AP -00298646 7!1/2010 GRAPHICS FACTORY PRINTING INC. 649.24 AP - 00298b4b 7i't/2010 GRAPHICS FACTOR!' PR[N"f[NG [NC. 150.89 AP - 0029R54G 2%1!2010 GF_APHICS FACTORY PRINTING INC. 30I.7S AP-04298647 7iLr2U10 GREEN ROCK POVJEREQUtPMF.NT 698.48 AP-00295647 7i120(U GREENKOCKPOW'EREQUII'1`-LENT 1;066.52 AP - 60'_98647 7i (12010 GR.F_EN RUCK POIb`ER EQUIPMENT 25705 AP-00298647 7;I/20I0 GREEN ROCK POWEREQU[PMENT 255.55 AP - 00298647 7i 1/2010 GREEN ROCK POWER EQUIPMENT 190.86 AP -00295648 7. (r'"2010 HASAN, JrVv1ES 1,295.00 AP - 00298649 7![/2010 HEARTSAVERS LLC 110.00 .4P-U0298650 711!2010 HE[L[G,KELLY 920.00 AP-002986>I 7!1/2010 H[LT[ INC 272.67 .4P - 00298652 7/02010 HOLMES, STAGY 1,006.55 AP - 00298653 7; 02010 HOSE MAN INC 163.84 AP - 00298654 7((:'2410 HOWARD, ZACHARY 94.00 AP-00295654 7/11'_0(0 HOWARgZACHARy 94.00 :4P-00^93654 "!1!20(0 HOWARD, ZACHARY 94.00 AP-00298655 7!1/2410 HSU;STEVE 496.80 AP - 00298656 7!1%2010 HUGHES, RANGE 29.50 AP - 00295658 7/(!2010 HYDRO TEK SYSTEMS INC 43.64 LLser: VLOPEZ-Veronica Lope2 Page: 5 Current Dater 67/14!201 ReportrCK_AC,ENDA_ REG_PORTRAI T_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Porh~aii Layout Time: t 1:13:5 CI'CY OF RAIeC"HO CUCAMOl<'GA P-50 A<_*enda Check Re2ieter F>!30/2(FL0 [hrouah 7/l3!20t0 Checl< No. Check Qatr Vendor Name Amomit AP - 00293659 7!1/2010 IMPERIAL SPRINKLER SUPPLY [NC 71 ~ l AP - 00298659 7/1/2010 IMPERIAL SPRINKLER SL!PPLY INC 1.550.05 AP - 00298659 7102010 IMPERIAL SPRINKLER SUPPLY [NC 583.09 AP - 00298659 7't /2010 IMPERIAL. SPRINKLER SUPPLI' [NC 130.96 AP - 00298C>59 7(112010 FDiPERIAL SPRINKLER SUPPLY INC _59.44 .4P - 00295659 7/1201 U [MPERJAL SPFLINKL.ER SCtF'PLY [NC 1,997.45 AP - 00398659 7/1!2010 fMPER1AL SPRINKLER SUPPLY [NC 305.13 AP - 00295659 7!1/2010 IMPERIAL SPRINKLER SUPPLY INC 271.66 AP - 00298659 711/2010 IMPERIAL SPRINKLER S(JPPLY [NC 1,209.91 AP-00295659 7/1/2010 [MPERIALSPRINKLERSUPPLY[NC 548.10 AP - 00298b59 7;1{2010 IMPERIAL SPRINKLER SUPPLY' INC: 80.51 ,4Y - 00293661 7/11'2010 INLAND PRESORT Re MAl[.,[NCi SERVICES T.45 AP-002986b2 71(/2010 LNLAND VALLEY UAFLY BIJLLE"CIN I17.U0 AP - 00298662 ?11/2010 [N LAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 216.00 AP-00298662 7!(12010 MLAND VALLEY D.4tLY BLJLLET[N 117.00 .AP-00295663 7/1;20!0 INLAND VALLEY DANCEACADEi~4Y 1,886.67 AP - 002986b4 7'1120(0 INLAND VALLEY EMERGENCY PET CL[N[C IZ L50 AP - 00295665 ?/ti2010 lNS1G1{T PUBLIC SECTOR '-:145.76 AP-00298666 7!(!2010 IN`COXIMETERS [NC 279.49 AP-(10295667 7/IY20lU IRON MOUNTAINOSDP - 1,688.92 AP - 00298668 7/O?610 J M SER.VlCES 1.495.00 AP - 00298669 7/1!2010 J[M PRATHER'S LANDSCAPE INC 2,430.00 .4P-00298670 Z'I/2010 JOF[NSON,VFLMACALf_EJO SO.S6 AP-00298670 7/11201(1 )0[-ENSON, VIL,MACAL.UEJO 22.00 AP - 00298671 7/120 10 KC PRINTING &. G[tAFHICS 342.35 AP - 00298671 7/1/2010 KC; PRINTING & CFRAPHTCS 20039 AP -00295671 7/1/2010 KC PRINTING &: GRAPHICS f 15.23 AP -00298671 7/1/2010. KC PRFNT[NG Bc GRAPHICS [96.85 AP - 00298673 7/1./2010 KHOU, MEND 360.00 AP-00293674 7/!/2010 KIDSART 1,414.00 AP-0029So7S 7/02010 KIM,UANIEL 392.00 AP-00293676 7,'12010 KlML3ALLMIllWEST 67.74 AP - 00298678 7/12010 LAMB. ARLF-.NE SOAO AP - 00293679 7/112010 LANDSCAPE S'CRUCTURES [NC 116,582.70 AP - 00298631 71!!20!0 L.DC TRAINING 655.50 AP - 00298632 7i O201(F LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES 35.00 AP -00298682 7/1/2010 LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES 35.00 AP-00298682 7/1/2010 LE.4GUEOFC,4L.IFORN[ACCf(ES 35.00 AP-00298682 7/L20l0 LEAGUE OFCALIFORNL4CITTES 35.00 AP - 00298632 7?1/2010 LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES 35.00 .4P - 00295682 7(1(2010 LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES 35.00 AP-00298633 7/1!2010 LEE,SYLVfA 50.00 AP-00298684 7i 1;2010 LEMLE,D.AJ(LLA 82.00 AP-00298635 7;0?010 LIM,HEATHER 3T_.00 .4P-00298686 7/1/2010 L[R~ISAUTO[NC 495.(19 AP-00295686 Z/l/20F0 LIMS.4CI'COINC 607.93 .4P-00298686 7112010 L[R1SAU'CO(NC '-43.47 AP-00298636 7/1/20(0 LIMSAU`['UINC 38.36 AP-00298686 7/1/20!0 L[IviSAi1TOINC 3836 AP-00298686 7/1/2010 LIMSAUTOINC 38.36 AP - 00298686 7; t/20(0 L[MS AUTO [NC 648.72 AP-00298(,86 7/1.;20!0 LIMSAUTC7[NC; 38.36 AP-00293686 7/1/2010 L[MSAClTO[NC 3836 AP - 00298687 7/1.2(1 I0 LCC`CLE BEAR PRODUCTIONS 95A0 User. ~I,CIPEZ Veronica Lopez Pant: G ~ Current DaEe: 07/1420( Report:CK_AGENDA_ R,EG_F'OR`CRAIT _RC - CK.: Aaenda Checl; Rea?stet Pora~ait Layout Time: l 1:13:5 CITY OF' RANCHC€ CLJCAMONGA A~aenda Check 12egister b/,02010 throunh ?/13/2070 Check Nn. Check Date Vendor Name AP-00298688 7![!2010 LIVBOAKDOGOBEDIFNCE AP-00298690 7/L2010 MAGRUDEk,KAREN AP - 00293ti91 7;' L'20I0 MA1N STREET SIGNS AP-00298692 7/IY2010 MANERISIGNCOMPANYfNC AP-00298693 7Il/2010 MANNFNGELEC:TRICINC AP - 0029&694 7!112010 P.4ARf7ARfiLLO, KAREN AP - 00298695 7/!/2010 MARIPOSA. HOR'PkC[JL.TLIILAL BNT INC AP - 0029869,5 7hlZ(I10 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL, ENP INC AP - 00298691 7/!/2010 MARIPOSA FFORTICUL'P[JRAL ENT fNC AF-00298695 7lV2010 MAR[POSAHORTICUL'IURALENT'INC AP-00298691 i!1,"Z010 MAR[POS:IH.ORTICCJLTURALENTINC AP-00298695 7/1/2010 MAR[POSAEIORTICULTURAL.ENTINC. AP - 00298[195 7/112010 R~G4RiPOSA HOR'IICUL'CUE2AL ENT INC AP-00298695 7/1/2010 MAR(POSAFIOR'PICCIL;PURALENT[NG AP-00298695 7/1/2010 MAR[POS:aHOR'I'ICULTURAL:EN'f INC AP-00298695 7!120!0 MA'RIPOS,4HORTICULTURALLNTINC AP -00298695 i!l/2010 NLARLPOSA HORT[CUL'fIJRAE, ENT INC AP-00298696 711/2010 MARSFIALL,SI'LVIA AP - 00298697 7/(12010 R.A.RTLNEL, LOC!A AP - 00298698 7/4!2010 MATF.RLAL SALES GTJLLM'ITED AP - 002986'98 7!1/2010 MA'I'ER1AL SALES UNL,[MITEb AP-00298699 ',/I%'20L0 M'CCAL,P.R,ERIN AP -IH129R700 7!L'^_-_010 MCMA5'['BR C:A12R SUPPLY COMPANY AP-(10298700 7:'1120[0 MC:MASTERCARRSUPPLYCOhIPANY AP - 00298700 ?'€i20L0 MCMASTBR CARR SC`PPLY COMPANY AP - 00298702 ?112010 MUE, JOFtN AP-00248'703 7/1/2010 -MOORE, RdICIIAEL AP - 00298704 7/12010 MOIr'NTA[N V[EV/ GLASS .AND b4IkROR INC AP - (}0298705 7/1/2010 MO[JN'FAIN VIEV/ SMALL ENG REPAIR AP-00298706 7i"02010 MWIVE'PERIN~1RYSLiPPLY AP-00298706 711/20[0 btR'1 VEPERINARl'SUPPLY AP-00298707 7/!201.0 MY"EIFCIIIN,NICOLE AP - 00298708 7/1!21} l0 NAPA AC.TO PAR'ISS AP - 00298708 11!!2010 NAPA AUTO PARTS AP-00298708 7/1/2010 NAPA ALi1'O PARTS AP - 00248708 7i"1/2010 NAPA AUTO PAR'I'S ,4P-00298708 7/1%2010 NAPAAU'COP-ART:S AP-00298708 7/1/2010 NAPA AUTO PARTS AI' - 00248709 7/I/2010 NICl~IC,)LS, GARY - - AP-00298710 2!1!2010 NEEVES,TR[t:TA AP-00298711 7iL20l0 NIM.4K0,SOLOMON AP - 00298713 7; 02010 NOP~ IH't OWN HOUSING BEV ELOP1vIF.N''P CORP. AP - 00298'7 L4 7/1/2010 NOVELTY PRINTING AP-00298745 71[2610 OFFiCEDEPOT AP - 00298715 7/i%2010 OFPICE DEPOT AP-00298716 7!!12010 OGINN[,PAUL AP - 002987 f 7 "t' i 120 k 0 OLDCASTL6 PRECAST [NC .AP - 00'2987!8 7/[20!0 ONTARtOICE SKA'1'[NG CE,NT'ER AP-002987 L9 711/20!0 ONTARIOWINNELSONCO AP-00298719 7/[,'2040 O;NTARFOWINNELSONCO AP - 00298720 7i 1r20L0 C}PEN APPS INL' AP - 0029872 i 7/ I /2010 ORKIN PEST CONTROL AP - 00298724 7!!/2010 ORKIN PEST CONTROL AP - 0029872! 7/[/2010 ORKIN PEST CONTROL User: V LOPE[ - Ve+onica. Lopaz Papa: Report:CK_AGENDA_,REG_PORTRAI'F RC - CK:.Ageoda Checi: Register Poarait Layout P-51 Amount 104.10 351.00 [,23.58 23. t 5650 4,901.13 ~.032.(JO 1.781.61. 822.67 2,737.36 187.14 870.75 696.51 5,059.09 ~,~R9.2.1 15,998.13 (,573.73 3,022.47 l,073.4D f 25.00 L185.>3 811.20 1,767.00 307.03 95.71 50.98 }72.50 71.00 43.58 31.14 I ,3A 5.24 272.32 1,01 1.60 (71.00 28.26 164.4 R 14.82 48.79 62.05 49&.75 82.50 250.00 RSO.oo 487.19 29.46 [7.33 SOQAO 812.10 314.20 24(.80 6.54 300.00 -35.fi4 1.493.80 -- _ Current Date: 07/14.'201 Time: 1.1:13:5 CITY OF RANCI30 CUCAIIONG A P-52 Agenda Check Register 6!30!2010 through 7/13/2010 Check Nn. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP-00295722 7/(%2010 PADEN,PATRICE E20.00 AP - 00298723 7/112010 PADILLA, M[CF[AEL 250.00 AP-00298724 7!U20L0 PAL CAMPAIGN 82.00 .AP-00298725 7![2010 PARS 3,500.00 AP - 00298726 7; I/20t0 P.4"fTON SALES CORD 5.48 AP - 00295726 7%1/2010 PA1'TON SALES CORD 69.12 AP-00298727 71)2010 PB.4MERIC:4SINC 10,290.00 AP - 00245729 7%I /2010 PEEK, LINDA V 4,160.00 AP-0029873) 7iI2010 PHOEN[XGROUPINFORRtATIONSYSTEMS 565.35 .AP-00295732 7i120l0 PIONEER MANUPACI"LIKING 2,16x89 AP - 00298', 34 7/1/2010 PT'CTL",NGER, CHRISTINA 56.50 AP-00298734 7/1%2010 PI'fTENGEK,CHRIST[NA 216.41 AP - W29873> 7il/2010 PLUMBERS De,POT [NC 243.ZS AP-00298736 7![2010 PORAC 196.66 AP - 00298737 7/1/2010 PRE-PAID LEGAL SBRV[CES tNC ~ )98.09 AP - 00298737 7/12010 P13F; PA{D LF..GAL SERVICES INC 11.40 AP - 00298738 %'112010 PRECISION GYMNASTICS L,?4720 AP-G029S739 7/12010 PULC:[NF.,LLA,.[OSEPH S-(10 AP - 00295742 ',/l/2010 RANCHO CUCAMONGA EONTANA FAMILY Ybt t 1,717.T_ AP - 0(3295743 7/ 112010 RANCHO ETIW.ANDA 68S LL,C 73,750.00 AP-00298744 7/1/2(110 RANCHO REGIONAL. VETER.[NARY HOSPI'1:4L [ 100.00 .4P - 00298744 7'1;20{0 R.4NCH0 REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL (: 25.G0 AP - 00298744 7!!!2010 RANCI[O REGIUNAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL [: 25.00 AP - 00295744 %!1/2010 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL f 25.00 AP - 00298744 71!/2010 R4DiCH0 REGIONAL VETERINARY t[OSPTTAL 1: 25.00 AP - 00393744 7!1/2010 RANCHO REGLOTdAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL I: 50.00 AP-00298744 7!l;"_'Of0 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARYHOSP[T.4LC 50.00 AP-00293744 7!1/2010 RANCHOREG[ONALVETERINARI'HOSPITALL 50.00 AP - 00298744 7102010 24NCH0 REGIONAL V€TER[N?ARY HOSPITAL f. 50.00 AP - 00293744 7;12010 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL C 50.00 AP - (10295744 7/12010 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY LfOSPI"LAL I' 50.00 AP-00293744 7r1,"1G10 RANCHO REGIONALVETERLNARYHOSPITALI'. 50.00 AP - 00295744 7/1/2010 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL I' 50.00 .4P - 00295744 7/1/2010 RANCHO REGIONAL VB'fERINARY HOSPITAL 1. 50.00 AP - 00298744 7!1!2010 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL L 50.00 AP - 00298744 7i I!2U 10 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL C 50.00 AP - 00295744 7/1 /2010 R4NCH0 REGIONAL, VETERINARY HOSPITAL f 100.00 AP - 1)0298744 7/1/2010 RANCHO REGIONAL VETE.RINARI' HOSPITAL f 100.00 AP-00298744 7;!/2010 RANCFiOREGIONALVE'fERINA[2.YHOSPITALI tU0.00 AP - UO?98744 7!1/2010 RANCHO REGIONAL: VETERINARY HOSPITAL L 50.00 AP-00295744 7/1/20(0 RANGfORECdONALVETERLNA.RYHOSPI'CALI C00.00 AP - 00298745 7;12.010 RAYBAL,LOONS 366.89 e\P - 00298746 7!I/20l(t R.BM LOCK. AND KEY SERVICE 18.23 AP - 0029$746 7i l2(t10 RBM LOCK AND KEY SERVICE 4.89 AP - 00295746 ?i I; 2010 RBM LOCK AND KEY SERVICE 27.99 AP-00298747 7/02010 RCPFA 9,(21.67 AP - 00293749 7;1/2010 RENTERIA, ROSE 30255 AP-00298751 7/120(0 RGAENVIRONMFNTALINC 2.060.00 AP - 00298752 7/1/2010 ROBERT BUSCH TOOL CORPORATION 344"44 AP - 00298752 7/1/2010 ROBERT BOSCH TOOL CORPORATION 936 AP -U029S753 7/1/2010 ROBLES SR, R.AUL P 15.00 AP - 00298753 7!112010 ROBLES SR, RAUL P 75.00 AP-00^98754 7/1/2010 RODR[GUEZtNC RY 216.00 AP - 00298754 7/ V2010 RODR[GCIEZ [NC, R Y 279.00 User: VLOPEZ-Veronica Lopez Page: 8 ~ Current Date: 07!14!201 Report:CK_.4GENDA_ REG_PORTRAf f_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrair. Layout Time: 11 x3:5 CITY OF 1.2ANCFIU t:UCAlYIUNC=A P-53 Aarenda Check Register 6/30/2010 through 7/13120'(0 Chcv k No. Check Date VenAor Narne Amonnt AP-00298757 7i120k0 RU[Z,STEVEN 15.00 AP - 00298758 7/1/2010 S AND E SANDELASTING 4,800.00 .4P-00298759 7!1;2010 SAFEWAYSTGNCOMPANy 1,778.06 AP - 00298760 7/1/20!0 SAN I3ERNARDINO CO P[RE DEPT 83.55 AP - 00298761 7i V20t0 SAN t3ERNARDINU COUNTY' AUDITOR CON'CR( 3R 1.00 AP - 002987( I 7/12010 SAN BEKNARDtNO COUNTY AUDITOR CON'['R( 747.00 .4P - 00298761 7/1/2010 5.4N QERNARDINO COCJNTY' AUDITOR CON'CR( 425.00 .4P-00298761 7!120(0 SAN BL-R:NARD[NOOOUNT(`AUDPCORCONT'R( 37950 AP - UO^_93761 711/2010 SAN BERNARD[NO CUUNTY AUD[T'OR CONTR( 508.00 AP-00295761 7/020[0 SAN F3F.:I3N.4RUlN000IJNI`Y.AUD!'IORC:ONTRC 3R1.00 AP - UU^_98762 7!112010 SAN QERNARDiNO COUNTY SHERIFFS DEP`(' 282.66 .AP - 00298763 ?i Lr20! 0 SAN [3ERN.4RDIN0 COUNTY FLOOD CON"(ROC, 700.00 AP - 00295765 7%1;2010 SAN EF,RNARDTNO COUN'['y 840.00 AP - 00298766 7/1;`2010 SAN BERNARDINO CTY' SCiPERINTENDENT OF 1;801.00 AP-00298;66 7/1;"20(0 SANBERNARD[NOCTYSUPERINTENDENTOF 1,80L00 AP-00295767 7((2010 Sf3PEA 729.17 AP - 00298768 7!1/2010 SC FUELS 13,645.60 AP - 0029S76S 7i'V20 t0 SC FUELS 9,881.29 AF - 00298769 7/ir'2010 SEVERSO*: PROBUCTS COR~tPANY 24240 .4P-00298769 7/1/2010 SEVERSONPRUDUCTSCOD`[PANY 9.09 AP-00298770 7iLi2U(0 SHER[FFSCOURTSERVICES 150.00 AP-0029577! 7!1/2010 SHERIFFSCOCiRTSERV[CES 150.00 AP-00298772 7/1/2010 SIGM,ANET 11,232.00 AP - UU29377d 7i'L'2010 SO CALIF G,4S COMPANY 81.78 AP - 00295774 7112010 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 3,566.31 AP -00298774 7iV20i0 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 15.29 AP-00248775 ?/112010 SOC-ALIFGASCOMPANY 1,352.(8 .4P - ft0298'i 60 ?/12010 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ED[$OrI 22.31 AP-00298780 7/1,•'20(0 SOCJ'CHERNC.ALIFORN[.4EDtSON '-2.75 AP - 00298750 7'12010 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 53.40 AP-00298730 7/L'2010 SOUTHERNCAL[PORNIAEDlgO1.f 21.84 AP - UU^_98?80 7/1/2010 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.76 AP - 00298780 7;12010 SOUTHERN CALIFORNL4 EDISON 2230 AP - 00298780 7/12010 SOUTI{ER.N CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.39 AP-00295780 7,'1;2010 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIAEDISON 25.87 AP - 00298780 7;12010 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 0.96 AP-00295780 7;!/20!0 SOCITHERNCALIFORNfAED[SON 2622 AP - 00298780 7/12010 SOUTHERN CALiFOR.NIA HDISON 17.69 AP-00298780 7rl%2010 SOUTHERNCALIFORNLAEDISON 22.97 AP - 00'_98780 7(I/2010 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 21.84 AP-00298780 7;120!0 SOC[TIIF.RNCALIFORNIAEDISON 21-84 AP - 00298780 7/1;20(0 BOLETI{ERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.62 AP - 00298780 7;120 t0 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ED[SON 22.b2 AP - 00298780 7/(;2010 SOLTHERN CALIFORNIA ED[SON 23.30 AP - 00298?80 '?./1(2010 SOCJT'HERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 21.84 AP-00298780 7/1/3010 SOUTi{ERN<:AL[FORN[AEDISON 56.81 AP - 00298780 7/I/2010 SOU'Cf{ERN CALIFORNIA EUISON 23.86 AP-00298780 7'1;2010 SOUTIiERNCALIFORN(AEDISON tU5.97 AP-00298780 '„1/2010 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIAEDISON 24-02 AP - 00298780 N L'2010 SCJUTI{ERN CALIFORNIA EDISCtN 24.08 AP-00298?RO 7%(;2010 SOCJTHERNCALIFORNlAED1SON 9=;~?2 AP - 00298780 7/1/2010 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 34.28 AP - 00298780 7; I/2010 SOUT'f LERN CAL,IFORNLA EllISON 112.91 AP - 00298780 7;1/2010 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 8755 User: VLOPEZ - 1 etortica Lopez PaBc 9 Curren[ Dace: 07/14/201 Report:CF_AGEN[)A_ R.EG_PORT-RAI' C_RC - CK: Aocitda Checl: Register Portrait Layout Time: l 1:13:5 CITE' OF IL4NCH0 CUC4b40NG.4 P-54 Asfenda Check Retrister 6i3U2010 through 7!13;2010 Check No. Check Date Vendor Dlxme Amount AP-002987$0 7!1/20!0 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIAEDLSON 372.73 AP - 00298730 7!1 :.010 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.86 AP - 002987$0 7/1/2010 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ED[SON 2622 AP - 00298730 7/1 %2010 SUUTHERN C.4L(FORN[A EUISON 26. l2 AP-002987$0 7/1/2010 SOCiTHERNCALIFORNIAEDISON 96.60 AP - Q029S780 7/[!3010 SOUTH F.,RN CAL[FORNE,4 EDISUN '31.54 AP - 00298780 7/1/2010 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 67.33 AP-00298750 7/1/2010 SUUCHERNCALIFORNL,4EDISON '-1.84 .4P - 0029878(1 7/1/2010 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 21.84 AP - 00295780 7!1!2010 SOUTHERN CALIFORNL4 EDTSON 67.19 AP - OU29$780 7/I/301U SOUTHERN CALIFORNLA EDISON 24.02 AP-00298780 7/I /201(1 SOLITHERNCAL[FORNIAEU[SON 476.'_7 AP-00298780 7!12Ut0 SOUTHERNCAL[EORNIAEDISON 37.91 AP-00298780 7/1/2010 SOC]'CFtEEZNCALIFORN[AEUISON 25A2 AP-002987$0 7/(/2010 SOUTHEItNCAL[FORN[AEDISON 48-54 .AP - 00298750 7/1.12010 SOUTI-[ERN CALIFORNIA E-DISODi 2I. L I AP - OU29S7$(1 7/U2010 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EUISON 23,30 AP - 00295780 7!1/2010 SOLJTHF.,RN CAL[FORNAI ED[SON 48,49 A'P - (10298750 7/!!2010 SOU-EHERN CAL.IFORNLF. EUISGN 48.49 AP-00298780 7/1/2010 SUUTE{ERNCAL[EORNLAED[SON 2025 AP - 00298750 7!!/2010 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 121.UO .4E'-00293780 7'1!20!0 SOUT'HERNCALLEORNIAEDISON 72.78 AP-00298780 7!1!2010 SOU'fHE[LNCALIFORNL4EDISON 2t.$4 AP - 00298780 7! 1/2U lU SOUCLiERN CALLFORNIA EDISON 23.30 AP-00295780 7;12010 SOL[1'IiGRNCAL[I=ORNI,4EDISUN 23.30 AP - 0029$7$0 7/0201(1 SOliTHERN CALIFORNIA ED[SON 21.1 I AP-00298780 7,'1/"_'010 SUUTI{ERNCALLFORNL4EDiSON 21.11 ,4P - 00293780 7;1/2010 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ED[SON 38.96 .4P - 00295780 7! 120(0 SOUTHERN CALIFURNL4 ED(SON 69.'_5 AP - 0039$750 711!2(110 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 38.02 AP - 00295780 7! 1 /2010 SOUTHERN CALIFURN[A EDISON 34.02 AP - 002987$0 7!!/2010 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 2350 AP - 00298780 7/12010 SOUTHERN CALIFORN[,4 ED[SON 32 20 AP - 002987$0 7/t/2010 SOU'['HERN CALIFORNIA GDISON 78.96 AP • 00298730 7/12010 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GDISON 99-26 AP - 00'_9$750 7/1/2U10 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISUN 281.03 AP - 00298780 7/I/2010 SO1JTf{ERN CAL[FORNL4 EDISON 23.06 AP-1)0298750 7!(!20(0 SOU'fHERNCALIFORNEAF..DISUN 23.16 AP-0(.12987$0 7/1./20(0 SOU'1'1{ERNC.ALffURMAEDISON 21.11 AP - 00298750 7/(/2010 SOUTHERN CALIF<?RNlA EDISON 21.84 AP - 00298780 7!1!2010 SUU1'HERN CALIFORNIA BDISON 20.92 AP - 010298750 7(112010 SOLITI-{ERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 2(11 AP-(10298780 7!I/2010 SOUTFIERNCALIFORNL.AEDISON 23.77 AP - 00298780 7!!/2010 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 86.34 AP~-00295780 7!1/2010 SOUTEERN CALIFORNIA EDLSON 21.34 AP - 00298750 7/1/2010 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ED[SON 2l . t I AP-00298780 7/!/20((1 SOU"CHERNCALdFORNIAED[SON 23.30 AP - 00295780 7!12010 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 9.87 AP-00298780 711!2010 SO(JTHERNCALIF02NlAEU[SON 2(34 AP-00298730 7,'[2010 SOU'fHERNCALIFURN[AED[SON 118.92 AP - 00295780 7/1/2010 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ED[SON 86.86 AP - 00298750 7/1/2010 SUUTHERN CALIFORNIA ED[SON 207.26 AP-00293750 7!112010 SOUTHERNCALIFORN[AED[SON S1.6U AP - 00298780 7102010 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 127 29 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopei Pave: 10 Current Date: 07%14!201 Report:CK_.4GENDA_ REG_PORTRaI T_RC - CK: Ageuda Check Register Poruait Layout Time: L 1:13:5 CITY QF t2ANCH0 CUCAht(DNGA P-55 Agenda Check Register 6/30!2010 through 7/132010 Check Nn. Check Date Vendnr Name .4momd AP-00298780 7/1/2010 SOU'CHL•RNCALIFOP.NIAED[SON 21.84 AP - 00298780 7/12010 SOU"CHERN CALIFORNIA ED[SON 81.4b AP - 00298780 7/12010 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EU[SON 23.30 AP - 00298780 7/12010 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 2746 AY - 00293780 ;; I/ZOIO SOIJT'HERN CALIFORNIA ED[SON 49.05 AP - 00298780 7!12010 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EU[SON _ 21.11 AP - (10298780 7;12010 SOUTHERN CA[:.1FORNIA EDISON 2237 AP-00298780 7/!!2010 SOUT'HERNC.4LIFORNIAEDISON 21.84 AP - 00293780 7!12010 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDtSON 68.83 AP -00298780 7112010 SOUTHERN C.4LIPORN[A EUISON 36.20 AP - 00298?SO 7!I/2010 SOUTHERN CAL[FOR.NIA ED[SON 94.61 .4P-00298780 7/1/2010 SO(JTFiERNCALIFORNL4EDISON 103.32 AP-00298730 7/I/20E0 SOUT'HERNCALIFORNIAEDISON 37.74 AP - 00298780 7/1/2010 SOIJTHER.N CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.54 AP - 00298780 7112010 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDESON 127.89 AP - 00298780 7/1!20{0 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDiSON 49.79 AP-00298780 7!1{20{0 SOUTHERNCAL[FORNIAEDISON 28b.47 AP - 00298780 7/12010 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 226.57 ;,P - 00298780 7!1'2010 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 40.69 AP-00298780 7/l/2010 SOUTF[ERNCALIFURN[AEDISON 15.45 AP-00'_98780 7!02010 SOUTI-IERNCAL[FORNGIEDFSON 21.84 AP-00295780 7/I /2010 SUUTFIF.RNCAL(FORN(AEDISON 340.74 AP-00298780 7;1!2010 SOUT'HGRNC.gL[FORN[AEDISON 39.94 .4P - 00298780 7!120 [0 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EU[SON '2.26 AP-00298780 7/U20f0 SOUTI-IGRNCALIPORNIAGUISON 40.03 AP-00298780 7!1!20[0 SOUTFIERNCALIFORNIAED[SON 77.19 AP - 00298780 7/1!2010 SOLI'CFIGRN CALIFORNIA gpISON 2 L84 AP - 00298780 7;12010 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 69.17 AP - 00298780 7/12010 SOIJ"CHERN C.4L[FORN(A EUISON 55.35 AP - 00298780 7/1!2010 SOL1T'FIF..I2N CALfFORNtA FA[SON 48.26 AP-00298780 7/Ir20t0 SOUTHERNCALIFOI2N[AEp1SON 34.bR AP - 0(1298780 7i l/20(0 SOUTFICiRN CALIFORNIA F,DISON 141.16 AP-00298780 7/1/2010 SOCJ'CHERN CAL,iFORN[A EU[SON 22.97 AP-002987SU 7il/2010 SOU'CFIERNCALCFORNtAEDISON 23.30 AP - 00298730 71{/2010 SOUI'HE.RN CALIFORNIA ED[SO'N 21.1 t AP-00298780 7.1/2Ut0 SOU`I'(-IERNC.ALIFORNIAED[SON 24.0' AP -00298780 7/1!2010 SOU'('HF..RhI CA(.dPORNIA EDiSON 21.84 AP - 00298180. 7r120I0 SOUTHERN CALIFOR.NEA EDISON 21.1 I .4F - 00298780 7/!!2010 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 21.11 AP-00298780 7/1/2010 SOUT'HERNCAL[FORNIAED[SON 2L57 AP - 00298780 7/l/2010 SOUTHERN <;ALIFORNIA EDISON 3;919?0 AP - 00298730 7i 1/2010 SOUTHERN CALCFORNIA FDISON 64.40 AP-00293780 7!1/20[0 SOU"THERNCALIF'ORN[AEDISON 22.40 AP-00298780 7/l/2010 SOUTH.GRNCALIFORNIAEUISUN 77.87 AP - 00298780 7/12010 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 4730 AP - 00298780 7/1/2010 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 21.1 l AP - 00298780 7i 12010 SOUTk{ERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 67.63 AP - 00298780 7!1/20dU SOUTI{'ERN CALIFORNIA EDTSON 72?6 AP-00298;80 7/U20f0 SOOT[-[ERN CALIFORNIAEDISON 2t.84 AP - 00298730 7!112010 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON St.0l AP-00293780 7/12010 SO(JTHERNCALIPORNLAED[SON 2l.ll AP-00298730 7/12010 SOLITHERNCAL[FORN[AEDISON 2E?6 AP-00293780 7112010 SOUTEIERNCALIFO[tNIAEDISON 48.23 AP-00295730 7!l/20{0 SOLITHERNCAL[FURNIAED[SC)N 23.58 User:VLOPEZ-Veronica Lo ez Pane: ll Curren[Date: 0?/I4,'?O1 Reporf:CK_AGENDA_RGG _PURTRAI' C_RC - CK:.Agenda Check Register Poruait Layout Time: t 1:13:5 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAlliONC.'.4 P-56 Aeenda Check Reaieter ti%30/2010 through 7/13!2010 Check No. Check Datr Vendor Name Amount AP -00293780 7/1/2010 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.>8 AP -00298780 7/(/20!0 SOUTHERN CAL IFORNG1 I?DISON 109.37 AP - 00298730 7!1,"10 TO SO[JTF(ERN CALIFORNIA EDTSON 22 `)3 AP-00298730 7!12010 SOUTHL•RNC.4LIFORNfAEUTSON 109.33 AP - 00298780 7;1/2010 SOLTTIiERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.30 AP - 00298?30 7i 112010 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISUN 23.30 AP - 00298750 ?/12010 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISUN 22.54 AP - 00293780 7/!2010 SOUTHERN CALIFORNL4 ED(SON '-2.30 AP - 00293780 7(1/2010 SUUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 2134 AP - 00298780 1r 1;2010 SUUTHERN CALIFORNIA EUISON 69 45 AP - 00298750 7; (/2010 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 21.89 .4P-00298780 7/1/2010 SUCJ'CHERNG1LfFORNIAEDISON 2fi,12 AP - 00298780 7/1/2D(0 SOUTHERN C AL[h'ORNIA EDISON 26 ~)3 AP-00298730 7r1(2U10 SOU'I'HERNCr1LIFORNIAF,DIgQIV 55.17 AP-00398780 7!1!2010 SOCiTHERNCALTFORN[AEDLSON 14.05 AF - 00298?RG ?/12010 SOCi'I'HEKN CALIFORNIA EDTSUN 22.57 AP-00298780 7!1(2010 SOU'l'HEKNCAL[FORNIAEpISUN 23.30 AP - 00298780 7 (/2010 SOCITE(ERN CAL.EPURN[A ED[SON 21.84 AP • 00'_98750 '„'1:3010 SOCI?'HERN CAL IFORNIAEDISON 2f.84 AP - 00298780 7/1/2010 SOUTHERN CALIFORNLA ED[SON 122.23 AP - 00298780 7/12010 SOUTHERN CAL[FOR.NIA EDiSUN 24.64 AP - 00295780 7 020 t0 SOCTCF-TERN CALIFORNIA ED[SON 21.11 AP - 00295780 7/1/2010 SOU[HERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.52 AP-00293780 7102010 SOUTFIERNCACdFORNiAED[SON 74.46 AP - 00298730 7!12010 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ED[SON 101.34 .4P - 00293780 7/1/2010 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA L•llISON 68.48 AP-00298780 7!1!2010 SOUTHERNC.4L[FORNL4EDISON 21.(1 AP - (10298780 7%1;2010 SOUTHL-RN CALIFORNIA EDISON 21.84 AP - 00298780 7!1/2010 SOCTHERN CAL[I'ORNLA EDISON 173.45 AP-00298781 7!(/2020 SOU1'HERNCAL[FORMAEDISON 68,2(5.36 AP-00298781 7i 1/2010 SOU'CHERNCALIPORNIAEDISON 24,174.75 AP-00298781 7?1!20!0 SOUTHERNCAL[TORNiAEDISON 5,213.02 AP - 0029873 ( 7i 1!2010 SOUTHERN CAL,[PURN[A BDISON [ 8,84-0.35 AP - OU^_98781 7/I /2010 SOIJTFEERN CALIFORNIA E?DISON 4113 .4P-0029818( 7/1/2010 SOIJTHERNCALIPORNTAF.DISON 4,939.16 AP-00293781 7;!!2010 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIAEU[SON 9,585.68 .4P-00298781 771/2010 SOUTHERIv'CALfFORNIAEDISON (1,310.?1 AP-00298751 7/(12010 SOUTHERN CAI,IFORMAEDISON ),445.46 .4P-0029878! 7/1/2010 SOCJ'I'HP,RNCAL[FORNfAEDISON 36.88 AP-00298781 7!1/2010 SOLrTHFRNCAL[FORN[AEDISON 6,128.82 .4P-0029378! 7/l/2010 SOCITHERNCAL.IFORN[AEUISCTN 8,`s36.13 AP-0029$781 7!1/2010 SOLTT'HERNCAL[FORNIA EDISON 12,950.35 .4P-00295781 7/1/2010 SUUTHERNCALIHORNIAED[SON 37.34 AP - 00298781 11112010 SOU'fIiER.N CAC,IFORN[A EDISUN 128.57 AP - Q0298781 7; ll201U SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA F,UISON !6,904.74 AP-00298782 7/I/2D10 SPEC[ALT[ESINC 4,221.83 AP-00298784 7/1!2010 STEEVE,~ViLE4A 115.13 AP-00298784 7/t/2010 STEEVE,WILMA 21209 AP - 00298 7 89 7r l/2010 STERICYCLE TNC 266.45 AP - 0029878: 7/ V2(I10 STER(CY'CLE [NC 950.57 AP - 00293786 ?11;2010 STOFA, JOSEPH 12.00 AP - 0029578? 7/1/2010 SUN LIFE 2.973• I I .4P - 00298?90 7/tl2D (0 SIRJSFIIYE GROVIERS NURSERY [NC d08.90 AP - 00298792 7/ V2010 TERRY, DUNNA ! 96.00 User. VI,OPEZ-Veron ica Lopez Page. I2 Cotten! Date: 07/14/201 Report:CK_AG£NDA_REG_PORTRAI T_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Podnit Layout Tirne: I I: i 3:5 CITY OI' RANCHO CUCANtONGA P-57 Aaaettda C![eck Register 6%30,'2(1 10 [hraugh ?113 2U l U Check Nn. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00393793 7.'1;2010 TOLL BEtOS tNC. 1,000.00 AP - 00298794 7,'1/2010 TOMAR.K SPORTS [NC 663.35 AP-00298795 7!1/20[0 TRUEL[NF,SURFACINCi 1,350.00 AP - 00298746 71020 L0 TURCH AND ASSUC[A'FES, DAVID 16,OU0.00 AP - 00298797 7/(/2010 TUYAY, MARY S.OU AP - 00298798 7/!!2010 UMFIRS'C UNIFU[L11 SERVICE 23.50 AP-00293798 TI/2010 (INIFIRSTIJNIFORM.SERVICE 40.00 AP -00298798 71[/2010 UN[F'[RST (JNLFYri2M SERVICE 115 90 AP - 00298840 7;112010 UNITED S['1'E 5ERVlCF.S OF CA [NC 132.96 :5P - 00298800 7/12010 CPVI'CED SITE SERV[C13S OF CA tNC 10.69 AP - 0029880( 7/12010 UNITED WAY 264.07 AP-00295801 7i 1;2010 UNITED\h'AY' 1[.00 AP-00298802 711;2010 UPLAND ANIMALEIOSPITAL 100.00 AP-00295803 7(1;2010 UPLANDTENN[SCLUg 1,71(,.00 AP-002988U4 7/1/2010 UPS 30.82 AP - 00298804 7/1/2010 UPS 20.0(1 AP - Q0298805 7;1/2010 URBAN GRAFF[Tl ENT'ERPRISF..S INC 21,702.50 AP-00298807 7/1;2010 tiSIT.A,.IUVELYN 25.00 AP-00298805 7!020 i0 UT! 734.05 AP - 00298810 ?!!!2010 VALVBRDF. SCkfOOL OF PERFORMING ARTS 13,562.00 AP-00248811 7112010 VASTA, WILLIAM 271.88 .qP-002958(2 7;12010 \4gUGHNIRRIGATIONSERVICESLNC 350.00 .AP - 00298812 7r 12010 VAU<iE[N IRRIGATION SERVICES [NC 3,800.00 AP-00298812 7/02010 VAUGHN IRRIGATION SERVICES INC 85.28 AP - 00298812 7;112010 VAUGEfN IRRIGATION SERVICES INC 2,660.00 ;tP - 00298813 7i 02010 V.AZQUEZ, WENDY 60.(10 AP-00298817 7/12(110 VER[ZUN 84.57 AP-00298817 7/12010 V'ERIZON 44.52 AP-00295817 7!1/2010 VER[ZON 59440 AP-00298817 7/12010 V'ER[ZON 476.28 AP-002958[7 7itr201U VERIZON IS.32 AP-00298817 7!L/2010 VERiZON 594.41 AP-002988(7 7,'02010 VERIZON 37.70 .qP-00298817 7/1;2010 VEKIZON 5L59 AP-00295517 7;1120!0 VEK[ZON 75.39 AP-00298817 7102010 VER[ZON 493.59 AP-00298817 7,'1,12010 VERIZ.ON 37.70 AP - 00298817 7; !2010 VERIZ.ON 18.32 .AP-00295517 7/V2Ut(1 VERILON 37.70 AP-00248817 7/lr"20(0 b'ER['Z,ON 386.19 .qP-00295817 7i 1/20(0 VER[Z.OiQ IR32 AP-00298817 711!2010 VER[ZGN 36.55 AP - (10298817 7I 112010 VERIZON ~ 1832 AP-0029881? 7;[12010 VER[ZON 35.17 AP-002988(7 7;1/2010 VEREZON IR.84 AP-00298817 7;1/2010 VER[ZON 36.55 .qP-00298817 7/120[0 VERIZON 151.02 AP - 00298517 7/1;?U10 VERIZON 35.17 AP-00298817 7:1/2010 VER[ZON 35.17 AP-00298517 7/02010 VERIZON IR.32 AP - 00298817 ?.+12010 VERIZON 37.70 AP-00298511 7/02010 VERIZON 18.32 AP-00298817 ?il/2010 VERIZON 18.32 AP - 0029881? 7/02010 VERLZON 1 R 32 User: VLOPEZ- Vzronica Lopez Page: l3 Current Date: 07/1.4201 Report;CK_AGENDA_ REG_PORTRAI T_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Pornait La~rout Time: L 1:13:5 CITY OF RANCHQ CUCAMONGA P-58 Agenda C[eeck Register 6!30!20 (0 through 7,'13!2010 Check Na Check Dafe Vendor Name ~ Amaunt AP-0029881.7 7,'[!2010 VERIZON 42.80 AP-0029fi8[7 7!L!2010 VER[ZON 37.',0 AP - 00298817 7!1/2010 VERIZON 12193 :1P-00298817 7/I/ZOIU Vf=.RIZON 42.80 AP-00298817 7!I/20F0 VERIZON 18.34 AP-002983[7 7/I!20F0 VERI`LON 18.32 AP - 0039881.7 7!L"20I0 VER[ZON 44.67 AP-00298817 7/112010 VERIZON 476.28 AP-0(1393817 7!1/2010 VEREZON 210.75 AP-002933!8 7/1.!20 L0 VICTORMEDLCALCO?\~FPAATl' 30L05 AP - (10298819 7i f1201(J VICCOR.[A ANf6iAi. HOSPITAL. 50.00 AP-002938(9 7/E/20[0 VFC'fORFAANIiVf.4LflOSPITAL `0.00 AP - 0029881.9 7; (/2010 V[CTORIA .4NI6•tAL. F3OSk'TTAL I90A0 .4P-002988(9 7r'120l0 V{CTORIAANIM.4L,HOSPFT.4L 100AO AP - 00298819 7;1/20[0 V[CTORTA ANIMAL HOSPCCAT. 100.00 .SP - 002988 F9 7/1r2010 VTC'COftW ,4NIMAL HOSPITAL. 100.00 AF' - 00298819 7i U2010 VICTOR[A ANFMAL HOSPITAL 100.00 AP-002983f9 7/U20[0 VICTORLAANTMALHOSPII'AL 50.00 AP-00298814 71: G€0 VICTORFAA?dIMALI~€OSP[T_AL 50.(10 AP-002988[9 ~'U2010 VIC'T'OR.IAAN[MALI-tOSPi'CAL 50.00 AP-002983[9 7!1/2016 VFC'CORIAANIMALHOSPI'fAL 50.00 AP-00293$19 7%t!20F0 VICTOR(AANIMALHOSI'(TAI. 50.00 AP-00298819 711!2010 V(CTUR[AANFFvtALF{O5P[TAL 50.00 AP-002938!9 ;%112.010 VICTORTAANIMALEIOSP[TAL 50.00 AP - 00298819 7,'(!20 VO VTCTOR.IA ANIMAL I-IUSPITAL 50.00 AP-00298320 7r 1!2010 VORTEXINDUSTRCESTNC 2,784.84 AP-00298820 7/[/2011) VCIRTEXINflLTSTRFES'[NC 270.00 .4P-0039882( 7/1;2010 VOSS,S'CEPEI,4NIE 57.00 AP-00298823 7/1,'2010 W'ALTERSWfiOLESALEEC,E-C'1'R1CC0 !,540,66 AP - 00298823 7! U20ICJ WAL,TERS WHOLESALE ELECTRTC CO 189.46 AP-00298821 7.'1./2010 W.4X[ESANCfARYSUPPLY 3,5:'0 AP - (10298824 7!1!2010 \L'AXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 704.83 AP-60248824 -I/l/20FG WAX[ESAN[TARYSU~PpL,Y 352.41 AP - 00298834 7/1!2010 WAXIE SANI'CARY SUPPLY 93.56 AP-00293324 7/1./20 F0 W'AX[ES.4NI'CARYSUPpLy -94.48 AP-00398824 71[/2010 WAXIESANCCARYSU,PPLy 24[.63 AP - 00298824 7;1./2010 WAX1E SANCFARY SUPPLY 84.96 AP - 00298329 7! (/2010 WAX[F., SANCCARY SUPPLY 14.22 AP-00298824 711!2010 WAX[ESANCI'ARYSUF'PLY 360.83 AP-00298824 7'l;?O10 \\/AX[ESANI'T'ARYSUPPF.,Y €37.82 .4P-(10298826 7/I/20F0 WIiSCORBCEt\rAF3LE~.SCORP 400.63 AP-00298827 7'I"?Uf0 WES1'COVTN.4W'HOI..ESALEN'URSERy 146.8( :1P-U029R829 7/1;2010 W'ES'CPAY[vfENTCEN'fER ?.31.91 AP -00298830 7/112016 WILSON AND F3ELL 671.43 AP-{)0298830 7!1;20(0 WFLSONAND[:SELL 73.00 AP-00248830 7il/2010 WILS<)NANDf3ELL 80.68 .4P-00298831 711/261(( XTRPhtSDETA[LENG 156.00 AP-00298832 7/1!2010 YCRKI'NDUSTRIF.S 939.60 AP-00298832 7/[i20F0 YORK(NDUSTRIEg 61.6.40 AP-00248833 7/I/20F0 ZAILO,ROBEF~T\V 366.60 AP-00298834 7!I/2010 Z,AVALA,I'ETgR 126.00 AP - 00298835 7/!(2010 ZEE MEDICAL INC 213.75 AP-00398836 7i6!20L0 AIRGAS WEST 100.35 AP - 00298838 7if.+/3010 13RODART F3OOKS 26.57 User:VLOPEZ-Veron icaL.opez Page: [4 CnrrentDate: 07/F 4!201 Report:CK_AGENDA_It EG_PORTRAI' C_RC - CK: Agenda Check, Register Parn-aii Layout Time: 11:13:5 CITY OF IL•#NCHO CUCAi~TO1VGA P-59 ALenda Clteck Reilister b130/3010 through 7i 132010 Check [Yo. Chick Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00393838 ?/60201.0 BRODART BOOKS 19.56 AP - 00298838 7/6!2010 BRODART BOOKS 14.68 AP - 00293838 7!6/2010 BRODART BOOKS 76.16 AP-00298838 7±6/2010 BRODARTBOOKS 74.80 AP-00298838 7!(!2010 BRODAR'CBOOKS it4.06 AP - 00298538 7/620 (0 BRODART BOOKS 14.67 AP - 00^_98838 7/6/2010 BRODART BOOKS 49.42 AP-00298838 7/6;?0(0 BRODARTBOOKS 14.64 AP - 00298838 7!6/2010 BRODART BOOKS 41:2 L AP - 00298838 7/6/2010 DROD.4RT BOOKS 14. i 3 AP - 00298838 7!6/2010 BRODART BOO(iS E4.69 AP - 00298838 7/6/2010 BF20DART BOOKS 61.74 AP - 00'_98838 7/6/2010 BRODART BOOKS 46.35 AP-0(1298838 7/6/2010 IiRODAR'i'BOOK,S lSLLO AI'-00298838 7lG/2010 BROL)AR["BOOKS 31.30 AP - 0(}298838 7/6r2010 BRODAR"F" BOOKS L5.62 AP - 00298838 7!6/2010 13FtODAR'C BOOF{S 10.17 AP-00298838 7/620E0 BRODARTBOOKS 8190 AP-00298838 7/612010 BP.ODAR'CBOOK9 10.17 AP - 0(}298835 7/6/20 (0 BRODART BOOKS 16.63 AP-00298838 7`6/'_010 BRODAR'LBUOKS 16.63 .AP-(10298838 716/2(}10 BRODAR'1'BUOKS 733.23 AP-0029SS38 7/62010 BRODARTBOOKS 14.64 AP-00298838 7/6/20 L0 BRODARTBC>OKS 26.7 AP - 00298538 7/62010 BRODART BOOKS 40.64 AP - 00298835 ?!6/2010 BRODART BOOKS 12.82 AP - 00298538 7(62010 BRODART BOOKS 1,434.51 AP - 00298838 716/2010 BRODART BOOKS 19.58 AP - 00298538 7/62010 BRODART BOOKS U.~7 AP - 00293838 7!6/2010 BRODART BOOKS 30.5.{ AP-00298838 71620(0 BROUARTBOOK.S 51.2 AP - 00298835 7/6/2010 BRODAR.T BOOKS 29.28 AP - 00298838 7/62010 BRODART BOOKS b3_ l4 AF'-00293838 7/620(0 BRODARTBOOKS 903 AP-00298838 7/6/2010 BRODARI'BOOKS 6.69 AP - 00298838 716/2010 BRODART BOOKS 6.69 AP - 00298835 7/6/20 (0 BRODART BOOKS 33.45 AP - 00298838 7/6/2010 BRODART BOOKS 9.03 AP - 00298835 7!62010 BRODART BOOKS 4.51 AP - 00298838 7/ti/201A BRODAR'I' BOOKS 2924 AP - 00298838 7/6/2010 BRODAR'C BOOKS 31.27 AP-00298838 7'62010 BP.OC)ARTBOOKS 4.51 AP - 00298838 7;6/2010 BRODART E300K3 6.69 AP -00298838 7!6./2010 BRODART BOOKS 4.51 AP-0029S83R 7/6/2010 BRODART600KS 1338 AP - 00298838 Z'6'3U10 BRODART BOOKS LS I AP - 00298338 7162010 BRODART BOOKS 4.51 .AP-00298838 7;(,2010 BRODARTBOOKS 17.71 r1P-00298838 7/6/2010 BRGDARTBOOKS 13.13 AP-00298838 7/62010 BRODARI'BOOI{5 2F2.U7 AP - 00398838 7/620E0 BRODART BOOKS 4.02 AP - 00298838 1!6/2010 BRODART BOOKS 20.07 AP - 00293538 7/6./2010 BRUDART BOOKS 9.02 AP - 00298838 7/62010 BRODART BOOKS G.G9 User:VLOPEZ-Veronica Lopez Paee: 15 Current Date: U7;14;"ZUI Rcport:CK_AGENDA_ REG_PORTRAI T_RC - CK: Agenda Check Re;isier Portrait Layout Time: t 1:13:5 CITY OF RANCHO CLiCAMONGA P-60 A¢enda Check Register 6/30/201 U ehrourh 7/l3/201.0 Check Nn. Check Datc Vendor Name Amount AP - 00298838 7/6/2010 BRODAR.T BOOKS 6.69 AP - 00298838 7/6/2010 BRUDART BOOT{S 4,51 AP-00298838 7/6;2010 BRODARTBOOK9 4.>t AP-00248838 7/6~'20t0 BILODAKTBOOKS 4.51 AP - 00298838 7/6/2010 BRODART BOOKS 30435 AP-00298838 7/6/2010 BKODARTBOOI{S 27.06 AP-00298838 7;6(2010 BROUARTBOOKS 6.69 AP - 00298538 7/6/20 (0 BRODAR`C BUOKS 9.02 AP - 00298833 7/6/2010 BRODART BOOKS 9.02 AP - 00298fi38 7/6/2010 BRODART BOOKS 6.69 AP-00298839 7/6/2010 CL'CAbK)NG.4 VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 749.96 AP -00298839 716/20(0 CUCAMONCA VALLEY WA'CER D15'fR1C"1' 57336 AP - D0298839 7/6/2010 CUCAMONGA VALLEI' WATER DIS'CR1CT 2,509.92 AP - 00245839 7/6/2010 C(JCAA40NGA VALLEY WATER DISTRIC'T' 957.54 AP-00298839 716!2010 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER.DIST'itiCT 1,158.01 AP-t10298839 7!6120!0 CLiCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 2.429.49 AP - 00298539 7/6/20 f0 CUCAMONG.4 VALLEY WATER DhSTRICT 674. .4P - 00295839 7%6;'2010 CCfCAR1UNGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 753.99 AP - 0D29SR39 7/6/2010 CUCAMO?[G=. VALLEY ;N'.ATER DISTRICT 65.56 .AP - 00298839 7/K2010 CUCAMONG.A VALLEY WATER DIST'R[CT 797.68 AP - 002988?9 7.!62010 CUCAMONGA VALLF..Y \VA"I'ER DISTRICT 9LSS .4P - D029S839 7!612010 CUCAb10NGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 97.27 AP - 002985x9 7!6,!2010 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 128.29 .AP-OD29S839 7!62D!0 CUCAMONGA VALLEY W.ATERDISTRICT 70.28 AP - 00298839 7/620 (0 CUC,AMONGA VALLEY W:1TER DISTRICT 129.77 ,vP-00298839 716:'20[0 CUC.AMONGAVALLEYWATERDISTRICT 131.26 AP - 00248539 716/2010 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER D[STKICT 76.54 AP-00293839 7;6!20[0 CUCAA40NGA VALLEY WA'CERDISTR[CT 69.85 .AP-00298839 7!6;2010 CUCAMUNUA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 69L83 AP -00298834 7162010 CUCAMONGA VALd.EY WATER DISTRICT 583.12 AP - 00298339 7/6/2010 CUC.4MONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 587.94 AP - 00298840 7r'6/2010 DA[SY WHEEL RIBBON CO [NC 104.34 AP - D0298R41 7/6!2010 llAPPER TIRE CO 961.60 AP - 00293841 7/6/2010 UAPPER TIRE CU 594.6.} .4P - 0029554! 7/62010 DAPPER'PIRE CO 265.54 AP - 00^_98841 7162010 DAPPER TIkE CO 253.08 AP-00298341 7/6/20f0 DAPPERTlRECO 519.74 AP-00298541 7162010 DAPPER.TiRECO 480.41 .4P - 00298842 7,'6/2010 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO [NC 380.88 AP - 00298842 7:'6/2010 HOL.LIDAY ROCK CO INC 91.08 AP - 00298842 716..!2010 HOLLIDAI' ROCK CO INC 605.55 AP-00298543 7161^_OIO MERIALL[MITED 607.48 AP - 00298$44 7i6r'20IU BEJAR, TERESA 405.15 AP-00298845 7x`7/20(0 AOMEBALLUONCOMPANY 270.00 AP - (10298841 7172010 ACME BALI.,OON COMPANI' 27CIA0 AP -00298846 7:7120!0 AGU[LER.A, KIRK & JENA 500.00 AP - 00298847 7!7/2010 ALCARAZ; FERNANDO 500.00 AP-00298850 7;7/2010 .ANTKEAdBi..UECROSS 147,(146.00 AP - 00298851 7/7,'2010 APPA 3,797.14 AP - 00298552 7/7/2010 ARIZEGtIIN, ANGEL 379.95 AP - OD29R853 7:7/2010 ASPA 100.00 AP - 00298553 7/7120(0 ASSOCIA'CION OF PERFORMING AR'['S PRESEN1 1,371.00 AP - 00298855 7/7/2010 ASSOCL4TION OF PERFORMING ARTS PRESEN'1 50.00 AP -00248556 7/71^_010 AUNTIE ROXIES L[FE OF TI-(E PAKTY 275.00 Crser: VLOPEZ-Veronica Lopez Pape: I ti Current Date: 07/1.4/201 Report:CK._AGENDA _REG_POR"CiZAC I"_RC - C;IC: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time f I:F3:5 CITY OF KANCFTU CUCAMONGA P-61 Agenda Check KeLister 6!30/2010 tluough 711 3120 1 0 Check Nn. Check Uate Vendor Name Amount AP - 00298&56 7/7/2010 AUNTLE ROXIES L[FE OF THE PARTY 275.00 AP - 0029RS57 7/72010 AU'CO CLUB SPE.LiUWAy 7,280.00 :1P - 00298858 7,'712010 AYERS, CHRIS AND SL[ARON .500.00 AP - 00298859 7/7;2010 BALNEG, RAF.4F..L 350.00 AP - 0029&860 7/7/2010 BARKER. BOB AND ARLENB SOU.UO AP-00298S6t 7/7/2010 BEVER[DGE,THERESE 500.00 AP-(10298862 7/7/2010 BOPKO,CFIR[STOP}IER 150.00 AP - 0029S8fi3 ~ 7/7!2010 BURNETT, CANDYCE AND CFIRIS 500.00 AP - UO"_98864 117!2010 CAL PERS LONG TERM CARE 548.96 ,4P - 0029SR66 7,'7/2010 CALPER.S 113,7&&.32 AP-00298866 7/72010 CAI,PEfZS 89.29 AP - 0029&869 71712010 CITRUS RECC CHAPTER ^_5.00 AP - 06'_98871 7172010 CUE, DONAL.U SU0.00 AP - 00295872 717/201 U CURRY, TOM 800.00 AP - 002988?3 7!7/2010 UENfAL. HLALT'I1 SEIZV ICES 44.40 .4P-0029&874 7!7/2010 DIAMOND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 622.87 .4P - 00298875 7!7/2010 DRIJM~,VRIGHT, ARTHUR R; TRANUA SU0.00 ,4F-00298876 "r112010 EICHORST, DEBBIE SOU.00 AP - 00298877 7!7/2010 EMBASSI' SUITES HOTEL -SAN D1EvC1 BAY 522.00 AP - 00293877 7/7f201U EMBASSY SUITES HOTEL -SAN D[EC'r0 BAY 1,593.44 AP - 00298878 7!72010 EIvIBASSY SUITES HOTEL -SAN DIEGO BAY 95 L72 AP - (10298879 7/712010 F,MBASSY SUCIES HO"fEL -SAN DIEGO BAY 951.72 AP - 00298881 7;72010 ERASURE, MICHAEL & JULIE 500.00 AP-00293&&3 717/2010 GAREY, DOUG & LINIYA 500.00 :1P -U0298S84 7;712010 GONELL.4, GARY 500.00 AP - 00298885 ?.!7,'2010 GRAN[CUS iNC. 937.50 AP-00298885 7l7i2ClU GR4NICUSRJC 1,100.00 AP-00298885 ?;7f2010 GRAMCUSINC. 489.38 AP-00298886 7r ;,!2010 GUF_RIZA.KELLYH. 200.00 AP-OU398S87 7/7,'20[0 GU[LLEN.NEL.IDA SOU.00 AP - 00298S88 717!2010 GU'C(ERREL; LLLL[AN 500.00 AP - 002988fi9 7;72010 HAMILTON, JAY 500.00 .4P - 0029S89U 7!7!2010 HARRIS, LISA & HENRY 500.00 AP-00298891 7/7/2010 HEEC.%HlCiF1LANDENVFRONMENTALE000AT[( 30.00 AP - 06298893 7!72010 HUT"f, D[ON 500.00 AP - 00298894 7f7/201U [ A A P 128.00 AP-00295895 7/7;2010 1CMA I,400A0 AP - 00298897 7/7/2010 ISHIDA, GLENN SOO.DU AP-00298898 7;7,'2010 JCIHNSON,CHEARICE 200.00 AP - 00298899 7/7/20F0 KAISER FOCJNDAT[ON IIEAL,T'H PLAN INC 139,976.74 AP-00298899 7,`7/2010 KAISER FOUNDATION HF..AI;F'FLPLAN INC 2,20434 AP -00298899 717,!3010 KAISER FOUNDATION HEAL"LH PLAN LNC 2,143 ?8 AP - U029S9U0 7172010 KONG', SOPEfiEr1K 200.00 AP - 40298901 7!7!2010 LEHRM.4N, L'DWARD & SANURA 500.00 AP-UU29S902 7!7;'2010 LOVE PRODUCTIONS [NC 7,500.00 AP - 00298902 7.'7!2010 LOMB PRODUCTIONS INC -525.00 AP-Cr0398903 7/7/2010 MALONB,ROY SUU_00 AP-00298904 7%7!2010 MARTIN,UAN[ELLE 200.00 AP-00298905 7r7!20f0 MASSEY.DOUC,LAS 500.00 AP - QU29R90G ?/712010 MCNULTY, ALYSSA Y,250A0 AP-00298907 7;7/2010 MORRiS,C:.4TFLY&HOWARD 500.00 AP -00298908 7i7l20F0 MUSIC THEATRE INTERNATIONAL, 4,467.63 .4P - 00298910 7/7,'2010 NIIVIAKO, SOLOMON 40Q00 AP-00298911 7/7'20]0 OAKSTONE WELLNESS ~ 2,27832 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Pane: l7 Current Uate: 07/1 1201 Report:CK_AGENDA _REG_POR'F'RAl' f_RC - CK; A~aute Check Register Pnrtrart Layout Time: 11:13:5 CITY OF RANCRO CUCAMQNG a P-62 Avenda ChecE: Register 6/30/2010 though 7!1312010 Check No. Check Ante Vendor Nucor Amaunf AP - D02939t2 7/7;20[0 OM1SNI HO"1'ELS 496.39 AP - 002989 t? 7/7/3010 ObiNI HOTELS 160.00 AP - 0029891; 7/7/2010 PARSAC 435,557.00 AP - 60298913 7/72D10 PARSAC 435,286.00 AP-0029391.3 7!7/20;0 PARSAC -1,000.06 AP - D0298913 7/71'_010 PARSAC 3,364.00 AP-00?989 L3 717/2410 PARSAC 142,864.00 AP - (}6298915 7/726((} PORAC LEGAL DEFENSE FUND 11 8.00 AP-00298916 7/7PL010 PRTNCII'AL,t.,l'FE 2,091.85 AP-00298917 7!7/2010 I?RO'CECI'IONDES[UN&CONSUI:I'(N<, 75.00 AP-002489?20 7'72D10 RENSLO\4;7ANE'C 1,50UA0 .4P-40298921 7!7/2010 RUBIO; RONDA 1,250.00 AP - 00298922 71720 IO RUIZ, MIKE 500.00 AP - 00298923 7/7/2010 SALD.4NA, KRIS'I'[; D4 2,233.00 AP - 00298924 71720 (0 S.4NDSTROM, .tOHN 500.00 AP - 00298925 7/1/2010 SLAY, KEVIN 1,750.00 AP - 00298926 7'7/2010 SLJ FRO AUDIO SERVICES SEAN JONES 2,400.00 AP-00298927 7/7/20[0 STARK.E,GEORGg SU0.60 AP-00298928 7/?'201C SUPLER,LISS.4 100.00 AP-40298929 7/71201(1 SURVEY'MONKEY.C'OMLLC 200.(!0 AP - 00298931 71720 (0 THEATRE FOR YOLRvG AUDIENCES USA 150.00 AP - 0029893'_ 717,'2014 THOD4PSON PLBLISHII~rG GROUP 438.50 AP-00298933 717/20(0 THORN"CON,KATHLEENB 500.04 AP - 00293934 7/7/2010 TURA'ER, MICHAEL I,OD0.00 AP-04298935 7(7/3610 USPUSTMASTER 8,000.00 AI''-0029893E 7/7f2QI0 VASQUEZ,ANTHONY~@RI'PA 500.00 AP-00298937 7!7!2010 V[SIONSERVICEPLAN CA 1Q368.[0 AP -00293938 7!',2010 WALTERS, LISA 1,000.(10 .4P-00298939 7/72010 WE'1"IPtNC 7+746.06 AP - 00293940 7172010 W[U_tAMS, CAROL 500.00 AP - 40298441 717 X610 WILSON, RYAN L 206.46 AP - 00293942 7/7/2010 L4'OLDANSK[, PA'CRICK 500.00 AP - 60298943 7/7/2010 WOLPSON"f', GEOFF ~ 500.00 AP-00298944 7/7;2010 ALeBBUSCOMPANY 525.(10 AI'-OOZS8945 7/7/'_0!0 ABI VIP.A'FCORNEYSERVICE 8(•19 AP - 00298945 7172010 ABl L'[P ATTORNEY SERVICE 32.63 AP - 00298945 7/72010 ABI VIP A'CTORNP,Y SERVICE 27.19 AP - 00298945 7,'7/2010 AB[ VIP ATTORNEY SERVICE 69.69 AP-06298945 7/7'20!0 ABI VIP AT'fOR.NEY SERV[CF. 8.18 AP - 00293945 7172010 ABI VIP AT"CORNEY SERVICE 52.44 AP-00298945 717x20(0 ABLVIP.4TTORNEYSERVICE 79.69 AP - 00298945 7/72010 ABI V[P ATTORNEY SERVICE 71.45 AP -0029394E 7,'72DI0 ACADEMY OF MUSIC 246.46 AP-00298947 7./72010 AC'F[ON AWr\R.DS INC. 66.44 AP-00298947 7;712010 ACT[ONAWARDSINC. 181.32 AP - 00298947 7/72010 ACTION AWARDS 1NC. 1,293.61 AP-00298948 7/72010 ADRIANERW[NPHOTUGRAPHY 277.31 AP - 0029895D 7/712410 AGUILERA, [SAIAH 86.67 AP-00298950 7172010 AGUILERA,ISA[.A[i 86.66 AP - 00298950 7172010 AGULLEIZA, ISA[AH 86.66 AP-00298950 7/72010 AGUILERA,ISAIAH 36.67 AP-00298950 717!2(110 .AGUILERA,iSA[AH 86.67 AP-00398950 7172010 AGUILERA,fSA[.AH 86.67 AP - 00248951 7/7/2010 ALLLtNT INSURANCE SERVICES INC. 5,346.80 t}ser: VLOPEZ-Veronica Lopez Page: B Current Date: 0 7/1 412 6 1 Report:C:K_AGENDA_ REG_PORTRAC C_RC - CK: Ageuda Check Register Porrrait I_nyout Timc: 11:13:5 CITY OF RANGEEO CLTC:~'~tONC~A P-63 Arrenda Check Refrister 6i"30!2010 through 7!13'2610 Check Nu. Check Date Vendor Name Amount .4P - 60298952 ?iT2010 ALPHA SYSTEbAS FIRE PROTECT'EON 911.08 AP - 00298954 71?%2610 ALTA COMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL [06.66 AP-00293954 7/7%2010 ALTA LC)MA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 56.00 AP -00298954 7!7!2610 ALTA WMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50.00 AP - 06298954 7/7;2610 AC:FA LOMA ANIMAL [-[OSPI'FAL 100.00 :1P - 00298954 7!?20t0 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HO5PETAL 100.00 AP - 60298954 7;7/20[0 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL F€OSPITAL L00.00 AP-00298954 7%7/20;0 ALTALOMAANIMALHOSp[T'AL 00.00 AP-G02989SA 7,'7/2016 A.L'rAl_Oft4A.ANtMALHOSPTTAL StlA6 AP -6029895-t 7/7!2016 ALTA I',OM1tA AN[14AL FOSPITAL -SUA6 AP - 0098954 71720E6 ALTA LO'[vLA ANIMA!. T 4:OSPI'P.4L 25.00 AP -00298954 7i7/20f0 A[.:T,4 LObfA ANIh-iAL HOSP[`CAL 25.00 AP -6U2989S4 7'7r"2Gf0 ALTA L,OMA AN(M.4L HOSPITAL, 50.00 AP -OU2989S4 7!?12016 AC"CA LOA1A ANlt\•tAL HOSPI'T'AL 50.60 AP - 66298954 7!7/`?616 A.1,1'A LOMA AMM,4L, HOSPC"C:\L 50.00 AP-00298954 7/7:261(} AL, 1'AS,OMA.4N1T4ALHOSP(TAL 50.00 AP - 00298954 7/7/2610 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSE'ETAL 50.00 AF' - (10298954 7;7/2010 ALTA E,OMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL SU.C0 AP -+10248954 717.261.0 ALTA I.,OEVEA ANii~IAL FCOSPFTAL 50.66 .AP - 00293954 7/7!2010 AC.'CA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50.110 AP - 00298954 7!712010 ,4IvTA LOMA ANI6IAL FiOSPI'G4L 50.00 .AP - 06298954 7/72616 ALTA LCTM1SA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50.00 Ap-06288954 7!',!20[0 AL1"ALOMAANIb1ALHOSPITAL 50.00 AP - 60298954 7/7/20IU ALTA LOMA ANEMr1L HOSPITAL 5(1.06 AP - 60248954 7/7/2010 ALTA L,UMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50.00 AP - 60298954 7!7!X10 ALTA LOMA ATV[MAL EIOSP[TAL 50.60 AP - QU2989St '7!7!20 CO ALTA LOMA ANIMAL EIOSPTTAL 50.00 AP - 6U2989S4 7;7!20IU ALTA LOMA AN)6.1AL HOSPITAL 5([.UU AP - 0029fi954 7i?;2010 .ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HUST'E"CAL 56.00 AP - 6U2989S4 7/7/20[6 ALFA LOM:A ANIMAL F-IOSP[TA[: 25.00 AP - 00298954 7/'/%2010 ALTA COM1-IA ANIMAL HOSPITAL, 50.60 AP - 00298954 7%7;2010 ALTA LOMA ANCMAL HOSPi1';AL 50.00 AP - 0029fi9S4 7;7/2010 ALTA [.OMA ANCMAL HOSPC'i'AL SO-00 AP - 00298954 7;7!2010 ALTA L,OMA ANEMAC. HOSP[1'gL SO.UU AP - 00298954 7;72010 aL'C'A L,OMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL ~ 50.00 AP - 6U2989S4 7i7/2UL0 AL'T'.A LOMA ANIMAL HOSPI"C'AC, 25.00 AP -(10298954 7,'7;2016 ALTA LOMA ,4NIARAC HOSPET_4L 25.00 AP - OU2989S4 7!7/2010. ALTA f.,Ob1A ANIMAL HOSPII'Al., 50.00 AP-00298954 717%2010 A[;CALOMAANIMALF[OSPI`CAL IU0.00 AP-0029893'9 7!'!/20[6 ARAM11ARKUNCFORMSBRV(CES 6.70 AP-00298956 7.!7/20(0 ARCHIBAL.DPETHOSPIT.AL 675.60 AP - 06298958 7!7x2010 AR"C [NS`F[TUTE. OF CALII?ORNIA-€NLAND EMPI 2,133A0 AP - 00298959 '?!12010 ASAP E'OWERSPORTS 931.00 AP - 66298959 7/7;2610 ASAP POWF,RSPORTS 3ti6.00 AP - 00298959 7!7/2610 ASAP POV/ERSPORTS 68.00 AP - 00298959 7/7/2610 ASAP POWERSI'ORTS 1,612.25 ,4P - 00298960 71720 FU AUTO BO[7Y 2060 1,569.43 AP - 00298961. 7/7/2010 E3AUGE ,4 MEN["C 102.85 r\P - 00298462 7/7;2010 BALUEON, CARLOS 432.25 AP-00298963 7;7!2010 BARNES ANDNUBLE 165.83 .4P-00298963 7/7;20[6 [3ARNESANBNOBLE 66.75 AP - 00298963 7(726! 0 BARNES AND NOBLE 206.10 AP - 00298963 ?;7/2010 BARNES ANE7 NOBLE 998.78 AP-00298963 7!72010 BARNESANONOBL[3 ll6?6 [Jsc r: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Pape: 19 Cnrrtnt Date: U7lt4/261 Report:CK_AGENE7A_ REC_PORTRA[ T_RC - CK: Agenda Check. Register PnrG-nit Layout Time: [ I:I3:5 CITY OF ~2.4NCH0 CUCAIViONGA P-64 A~entla Check Register 6%30/2010 (!smug}( 7r'131201U Check Nn. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP -002989&3 7!7120!0 BARNES AND NOBLE 1,005.25 AP-00248963 7%7/2010 BARNES AND NOBLE -156.53 AP - 40298963 7%T2010 BARNES AND NOBLE 461.08 AY - 1)0298463 7,'7;2010 BARNES AND NOBLE 60.75 AP-U02989fi3 7,'712010 BARNES AND NOBLE 853.82 AP - 002989(13 7/"2010 BARNF;S AND NOBI..E 148.00 AP - 00298963 7/7x2010 BARNES AND NOBLE. 149.87 AF-00298963 7!7/20(0 BARNES AND NOBLE 853.82 A~P - 00298963 7/7/2010 BARNES AND NOBLE 1,284. (U AP - 002989(13 717x2010 BARNF,S ANp NOBLE 219.92 AP - 00298963 7!7/2010 [3ARNES AND N013LE 64.22 AP - d02989ti3 7/7/20 (0 BARNES AND NOBLE 18.09 ,hP - 1)0298963 "r.%7/2010 BARNES AND NOBi.F; 139.00 AP - 00298963 717!20 (U BARNES AN'U NOEl..F.i 83.36 AI'-40298964 ?/7/24[0 BAYER.FIEAL'FHC:AREI,I,C 50L82 AP-00298966 7x7;2010 13ERNARD,IEREMy 1,045.50 AP - 00248967 7/7/2010 BF.,RNARD, JESSECA HASH 1,045.50 AP-QU29896R 7x7!2010 BOL.TON,HEAT[-[ER 2,3(10.00 AP-00293968 7%7/2010 [?CI.,TON,i:E:1TkiER 24.17 AP-06298468 T7%2010 BOL"fON,i[EAT'1iEEt -L524.94 AP-00298968 7/7!20(0 BCLTON,HEATIiBEt ?7.00 AP-00298970 7i 7;20[0 CABLF:INC. 315.00 AP - 0029$97 E 7!7/2010 CALIFORNIA S[IOPPFNG CART RETRIEVAL COR 125.00 AP-OU2989T2 7;7,'2010 CAMERON WELDING" S[JPPLy 745.01 AP-00298973 7/712010 CDW-G 453.[4 AP - 40298473 717,'2010 CUW-G i 84.75 AP-00298973 7/7%2010 CDW-G -t 84.75 AP-00298973 7;7/2010 CDW-G 44211 AP-00298973 ?/',!2010 CD~N~-G 63.43 A.P-0029897; 7172010 CDW-(; -5,2[2.77 AP-00298973 7/7!~i)10 CDW-G 242-55 AI'-00398973 7/7/2014 CDW-Cr 470.23 .AP - 00298973 7,'?/20 (0 CUW-G -453. L9 AP - 00298973 7/7/201 t) CDW-G 453. ( 9 AP - U0298974 7/7/2010 CH:ALLENGE R4ARTIAL.ARTS INC, t t L00 AP - 60248975 7!7/2010 CFLAMPION A WAKES AND SPEC[,4L: CiES 8156 AP - 00298975 7%7;20 (0 CH:AM.P[ON Als/ARDS r'ti.ND SPECEAhTIES 632 X13 AP-00298979 7!7.!2070 CON'PRERAS,LISA 75.00 AP-00298979 717;2010 CON'1'RERAS,L[SA 450.00 A.P-00298979 7/7/2070 CONTRERAS,L[SA 460.00 .hP-00298979 7712014 CONTRERAS,L[SA 400.00 AP-00298979 7,'712016 CON"CRERAS,L[SA 400.00 AP-60298980 ?%7;2010 COP 'COR'N CRvIFORA4S [NC. 74.71 AP - 00298981 1.%7/2010 CCPIES ~c INK PRINTING MC_ 294.06 AP - (1029898[ 7/7/2010 COPIES & LNK PRINTING INC. 59.24 AP - 0029898E 7/7!30'10 COPIES ~ INl. PRINTING, INC. 59.29 AP - 00298981 717;20 t0 COPFES & INK PRINTING INC. 11255 AP - 00298981. 717/3010 COPSES & INK PR[NTCNG [NC. 53.29 AP - 002)8982 ??7/2U[U CORBETT, RCBERT 33.00 AP - 00298983 7/?/2010 COVENANT STAFFING INC. 177.80 AP - 00298983 7/7lZOlU COVENANT STAFFING [NC. 2fi.G7 AP - 00298983 7,'7;2010 CCVEN.AN"[ STAFFING INC. 71.12 AP - 00298984 7'71201 U CRACI'MASTER ENTERPRISES 56.70 AP - 00298985 7'7/2010 CUCAMONGr\ VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 2,395AR Liaer.VLOPEZ ~ewnicaLOpez Pane. 20 CareeettDate: 07/14/20( Report:CK_AGENDA_ REG_PORTRA[ T_KC - C[C: Agenda Check Register Pamait La;~out Time: l 1:13:5 Cl'CY OF SL~;WCFSt} CUC:~IiSONCA P-65 Agenda Clteclz Res=ister 6;30/2010 [hrough 7;13/2010 Check No, Cteeck Uate VenAsr Name Amuartf AP-(10298985 7;7!20!0 CUCAMONGA V:~LLEY WATER DISTk[CT 69..14 AP-00298985 7.7/20!0 CUCA(4tONGAVALLEYN%A'I'ERDISTRICT 42?0 AP-OU29898> 717i20t0 CLICAh4C)NGAVALLEYWATERDiSTkKT 329.!3 AP - 40298935 7/7!2010 CUCAMONGA VALC,EY \VATER D[STRIC'C 290.36 A.P - 00298985 7.!7/2010 CCJC'~AMONGA VALLEY WA"FER. DISTkIC"t I5I.U2 AP-00298935 7i7%2014 CUCAMONGA VA(.,I.,EY \VATEk DISTRICT 183.53 AP-00293985 7'7/2010 CUCAbtONCiAVALLEYWATERDISTRICT 199.70 AP-D0298985 7/712010 ClJC.4MONGA VALF.,EY WATER DISTRICT (36.9[ AP - 00_'93986 7'7!2010 DE. VKIES PES'C CON'LROL LVC. 175.00 3€~'-00?98986 7(7120!0 DEVRIESPES'PCON"CROLfNC, 475.00 AP - 00293987 7.!7/2014 13E.FAR'PMEN'I' OF CONSEkVA'l`ION 1.94G.96 AP-04298937 7/7/2010 DEPAIt'I'MEN'1'UFC:ONSERV.4T[ON -97.35 AP-00298991) 7/1/20!0 DGOAUTODE"CALLING 165.00 AP-06298990 777/1010 DGOAUTODETAR[NG I65.U0 AF -64298990 7`7/20!9 DGO AUTO DETAILIN{; 165.00 .AF - 00298994 7/7/20! U DGO AU'CO D[::TAILING 165.00 AP-00248991 7~7.20I() DOGS ETC. SOO.OU .4F - 0029899^_ 7r'7,<Ol(1 DUNN ED\0.'ARI)S CORPOkA1~[ON 43.37 AI'-06298993 7/7''20 iv EASTERLING,Fv;Y IU0.00 AI°-0029899,1 7!7!2010 ECSIMAGINGINC 4,775.42 AP-0029899± 7!7!2014 EIGI€THAVENUEEN'CERPkISELL,C 288.49 AP-00298996 7.!7!24(4 ELL!SON-SCFINEIDF.k&.H.4liRiSL..L.P. 4,599.00 AP-00298997 7I',r^Old ENGRAVE'NEMF3ROCDERTFIINCr8 868.91 AF-04398997 7/7/20!0 ENC3R.AVE`NEMC3R0[DERTHIN{;S 309.93 AP-00298997 7/7/2014 ENGRAVE9V EMBROCDERTHINGS 1,!44.05 AP - (10298998 777!2010 EP CONTAINER. CORP. 2,338 AS AP - 00244000 7/7.!2(110 FEDERAL E,KPRESS CORP 37.35 AP-00299002 7/7/2010 FIDELITYF34NCURP 23.00 AF - 00299003 7!7(20(0 FOO`C SOLUTIC)NS 130.49 AP - 00299004 7/'7120! U E'ORD OF UPLAND INC 36.94 AY - 00299(104 717:2010 PORll OF UPLAND INC 725.87 AP - U0299004~ 7;7/2010 FORD OF UPLAND [NC, 2,753.25 AP - 60299004 7/7!20 i0 FORD OF UPLAND INC 36.94 AY - 00299045 777/24!4 FOREMC)S`F SILKSCREF.iN AND EMI3K0€DERY 348.44 AP - 00299605 7/7 X010 FOREMUS.C S[L,KSCREEN AND Ei11413ROIDERY 3,336.93 AP-00294007 7/7!2010 FREENUR,I'ERONICA 77.00 AP-60299010 7,'7/20!0 GAELMATERIA'LS (,017.7 AP - 00299011 7/7/2014 GALE GROUP; CHE 3128 AP-0629901! ~ 7%,!24!0 C,ALEGROU[';T'FFE 31.28 AJ'-U02940LL 7;712010 GALF..C;,ROUf';l"kIE 31.28 AP-00299411. 7%7/20!0 GAI,EC,iROUP"THE 31.28 AP-002940!3 7,'712610 GIUCEY,3Oi-[N 150A0 AP-00249UL4 717;2410 GRAIN<iBR 1,165.69 AP-00299614 71'7/20(0 GIL4[NGER. 11193 AP-00299015 7r7~201U GRANITE STATENSURANCECO. 5,767.96 AP-002990IG 7!?;3UlU GRANT III, VINCENT 86.67 AP-002990LG 7,'7/20!(1 GRAN'CRI,VINCENT 86.67 AP-002990!6 7/7/2010 GkANTL17.,V[NCEN'1" 86.67 AP - 00299016 7;'7,26 i U GRANT III, VINCENT 86.66 AP - 00299016 7~`1i2U l0 GRANT €II, VINCENT 86.66 AP - 002990 L6 7/7201.0 CiRANT ICS, VINCF,NT 86.67 AP-002990€7 7/7120[0 GRBENC,ENIg 250.00 AP - 00299017 7!7/20!0 GREEN C,ENIE 267.20 AP - 00^^<99017 7/7/2010 GREEN GENIE 350.00 Oser:VLUPEZ beran icaLaFez Pace: 21 CuneniDafe: 07'14/201 ReFort:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORIRAF T_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Frnnait Lavout Time: 11:13:5 CITY C)F IZ,4NCH0 CI1CAiril'7P~TC:A P-66 A~etada f..ttec[c Register 6,!30x2010 through 7%i 3.'2010 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amoanf AP-00249013 717,2010 GUEEZRERU,PHIL[p 60.00 AP-t)Q2990t4 7,'?%2[IID HAIL~LAMBOSBEVERAGECUbtPANy 312.70 AP - 00299020 7/7/2010 HEAR"CSo~VERS LLC :390.00 AP-0029902€ 7!7/20!0 HENLEY,L15,4 87.51 AP _ UU~99022 7!7!20[O HILLS PET NU'CRITION SALES INC 982.89 AP -00299022 7!?/2010 HILLS PETN(J'T'RITION SALES INC:. fi25.99 AP - 0U299UZ2 7r"712010 I{ILLS PE1' NU"fIZI`CIUN SALTS L'QC ?-70.44 AP - 00299023 7/7,20!0 HOOU, KARYE 18.30 AP - (}0299025 7/7/2010 HOT SHOTS AT1 tLE"P[C APPAREL 1NC. 2,425.47 .4P - 00294026 7;7.2010 HOl'~'ARD, ZACHAFZy 80.00 A[?-40299026 7x7/2010 HOWARD, ZACHARY 80.00 AP - 00299(.)26 7/7.!2010 HOWARD, ""/_.ACF[AtZ.y SU.UO AP - GO^_99027 7x71201 D t-[UMANE SOG1F:'I'Y CiI' SAN [3ERNARD[NO VALt 2 t 5.00 .4P-00299028 7!7/2010 HUYNFI,TRANG - 125.00 AP - 00299029 7!7/2010 t A A P 25.00 AP - 00299029 7,'7!2010 k' A .4 P 25.CrU AP - 00299029 7.!7/2010 I A .A P 25A0 AP - 00399029 7i7~""2010 [ A A P 25.00 AP - 00299030 7/712010 IDEAL C~RAPFIR:'S 36'.00 AP - 01)299030 7i"!.%20 [0 [DEAL GRAPHK: S 437.18 A:P - 0029903 L 7/7%20 f 0 [MF'ER[AL SPRINKLER S[JPPLY CNC 200.00 AP - 0029903 [ 7/7/20 (tt I,MPERIAL SPRINKLER SUPPLY [NC 433.92 AP - 00299031 7!7/2010 CMPEPuAL SPRINT{.LER SUPPLY INC ~ 142.57 AP - OU'?99032 7172010 INTERSTATE BATTERIES '.0.47 AP - 00299032 717'2010 INTERSTATE Br~ATTERLES 646.52 AP - 00299031 7(7/2010 [NTERSTATB BATTERIES 1.771.54 AP - 00299033 7/7/2010 INTERSTATE BA"1"I`ER(ES t,879A4 AP - 00299034 717'2010 LNTER,WEST CONS[JLTING GIZOLIP [NC 1,567 i0 AP-00299034 7/72010 [NT€RWESTCONSLi I:CINGGROUPINC (,7LU.00 "4P-00299035 7!72010 .IOHNSONL[FTHYS'I'ER ZI9.30 AP -00299036 7/7/'0!0 JONES AND MAYER, LAW OFF'7CES OF E,457.50 AP -00299036 7;7!20!0 .ZONES AND M.AYEft, L.4W OFF'[CES OF 1,087.50 AP-U(Y249U37 71~i2010 RKWUUDWORKINCi 106.55 AP-00249035 7!7/2010 KCPRINTCNG&GRAPHICS 92.44 AI'-00299939 7!7/20(0 KCRAPIUINC 182.00 AP-00299040 7/7/2019 KELL,YEQU(PMF,NT 1,165.45 Ap _ (}0299040 717/ZD 10 hE,LLY EQUCF'MEN"C 67.99 AP - 00299041 7/7!2010 L,A.B SAFETY SUPPLY lNC 23'1.80 AP-0029904^_ 7/7!20(0 LAMOURFUX,JFJLIE 80.00 AP - 00299044 7.!71?010 [_EAL, RU'I'N 108.00 AP-00299046 7;"1/20(0 LI,MSAUTOtNC, 33-36 AP - 00299044 7/712010 LIMS AU'CO INC 38.36 AP - 0(1299046 717!2010 I,.CMS AU'CU CNC 38.36 AP - 00299046 7!7%2010 LCMS AUTO CNC 38.36 AP - U029904G 717!20 [U LIA4S AUTO INC 243.47 AP - 00299046 7x712010 LIMS AUTO INC; 38.36 .4P - 00299046 717x2010 LCMS AUTO LN<: 38.36 AP -0029404?' 7/7/2010 LIMA 17,248.b0 AP - 00294048 ;?! 7!2010 L[T CLE GEAR PR9DUC'CIONS 27--5.00 AP-00299048 7/7/2010 L1TTC.EBEARPRODUCTIONS 375.00 AP-00299049 7x7/2010 tvLA1NI,fNEINPOIZbiATTONSI'STEMS 32,451.00 AP-00299049 '1,17~26t0 R•1,4[NL[NE[NPORtt•L4TIONSYSTEMS 450.00 AP - 00299049 7/7-'2010 I~LAINL[NF EYFORMATCON SYSTEMS t (0.93 AP - 00299049 7/7/20(0 MAINLINE INFORMATION SYSTEMS 1,850.00 User: VLOPEZ Vercmica Lnpez Page: 22 Current Date: 0714/201 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_POR1'RA1 T_RC - CK:.4~cnda Check Register Portrait layout Time: 1.1:13:5 CITY OF RANCHO CliCAMONGA P-67 Agenda Check Register 6.!;012010 throueh 7!!3.!2010 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00299010 7/7/2010 MARIPOSA FIOR"CICUCCUR.4L ENT [NC 3,983.67 AP - 00299050 7/7/2010 MARIPOSA HURTICULT'URAL ENT CNC 8,51112 AF - 00299050 7/7!2010 btAR[POSA HORTICULTURAL L-NT INC I4L57 AP - 00299050 7!7!2010 MARIPOSA HORi`[CIILTURALENT INC 348.47 AP-00299050 7!7!2010 MARIPOSAHOR"CICULTURALENTINC 141.81 AP - 00299050 7!7/2010 h•1,4RIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT ENC 1,735.49 AP - 00299050 7/7/2010 MARIPOSA FtORTECULT'UR.4L ENT INC 9,718.59 AP - 00299050 717/2010 MARIPOSA HORT[CULTURAL ENT INC 20,849.75 AP - 00299050 7/7/2010 MARIPOSA IiORT(CULTUR.4LFNT INC 304.52 AP - 0(1299054 7; 7/2010 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 8,877.36 AP - 00299050 7/7(201.0 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC (,910.52 AP - 00299050 7/7/2010 MARIPOSA FIOR"C[CULTURAL. ENT INC. 3,79A.44 AP - 00299052 7/7/2010 MARQUETTG COMNtERCL4L PiNAN'CE 1,944.45 AP-00299083 7/7/2010 MARSHALL AND1YfCKNIGH'T'('OW1NG[NC 104.00 AP - 00299054 717'2010 MARSFL4LL, PLUMBING 257.68 .4P-44299054 717/241(7 MARSFLALLPLCJMt3ING 125.00 AP - 40299054 7'7/2014 MARSHALL PLUMBING -70.25 AP - 00299054 7;7/2010 MARSF[ 1LL PLUMBING 2R 1.00 AP- 60299054 7/7/2410 1t4ARSFfALL PLC!1aBING -64.42 AP - 04299054 7!7%2010 MARSHALL PLUMBING -3 L25 AP-00299054 7/7/2410 MARSHALLPLUMB(NG 193.04 AP - 04294054 7/7/2410 MARSHALL PLUMB[NG -73.83 AP - 00299094 7/7!2010 MARSHALL PLUMBING 295.29 AP - 00399054 7!1!2014 M:IRSFIALL PLUMBENG -166.25 AP-00299054 7!7,2010 1`4AR.SHALLPLC)]\46INC 665.44 :1P-00299054 7; 7/20 t0 i~tARSHALL PLt!MB[NG -76.19 AP - 00299084 7/7/2010 MARSHALL PLUMBING 344.74 AP - 00299054 7;7!20(0 MARSFALL PLUdiBENG -73.44 AP-40299054 7/7/2010 MARSHALLPLLIb4BtNG 293.74 AP-00'_99014 7/7/2010 MARSH,4LLPLlJMBING -48.25 AP - 00299055 7/712414 MATANGA, JULIE EDW`.4RU 73.50 AP - 00299056 7/712010 MATTHEW BENDER AND CO. INC. 18.39 .4P - 002)4056 7/?!2010 A4.4TTHEtV' BENDER AND CO. INC. 1.00 AP - 00399486 7/7/241(1 MATTHE W BENDER AND CO. INC. L00 AP - 002990.58 7/712010 MEF{AS CONSTRtJC:TTON INC 42.50 AF-00299059 7/7/2010 4tID1VE,ST'i'APE 327.56 AF - 00299059 7/7/2010 MIDWEST TAPE 113.91 AP-44299059 7;7~20L0 MIDWES'1"GIPg 132.94 .4P - 00299059 7!7/2010 M[DWEST TAPL' 200.91 AP - 00299059 7!7/20 i 0 MfDbVE5'l- TAPE 135.90 AP-((0299059 7/7.'2010 MIDW'E9TTAPE 7.Sf)8 AF-40299059 7/7!2010 ~4IDWF.:S'iTAPE >57.3R AP-04299059 7/7P20I0 MIDWEST TAPE 39.99 AP - 042990>9 7/7/20 14 MIDWEST' TAPE 135.46 AP - 00299059 7{7!2010 MIDWES"T TAPE 39.99 AP - 00299060 717'2010 MULTNOMAH COUNTY LCBKARY 30.00 AP-00299060 7!7/2010 MULTTIOPof.4F[COUN'CYLIBR.4RY 20.04 AP-00299061 7/7/2014 MWI VETERINARY SUPPLY 21.89 AF - 00299061 7/7/2010 MVJI VETERINARY SUPPLY 350.85 AP-04299061 7/7/2010 MWI VE-CERINARY SUPPLY 764.87 AP - 40299061 7/7/20 t0 M W [ VET'ERiNARY SUPPLY 163.42 AP-00299061 7/7/2010 MWI VETERINARYSCiFPLY 67.60 AP - 00299061 7(7/2010 biW'[ VETERINARY SUPPLY 74.2 L AP - 00299061 7/7/2010 M W'i VETERIN'AR!' SUPPLY 23.03 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Pave: 23 Current Date: 07/14;20( Report:CK_AGENDA_ R.EG_PORTRAI T_RC - CK: Agenda Check Reni;ter Portrait Layout Time: 11:13:5 CITY Ox' RAfVCHO CUCAMONGA P-68 ALenda Check Register 6!3012010 through 7(13!2010 Chcck No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP-00299061 7r'7l2010 ViRrIVETERINARYSUPPLY 324.ID AP-00299061 7;7;2010 k[1VIVE'CER[NARYSUPPLY 12•'7 AP-00299061 7;7;20(0 A4W[VETERRJARYSUPPLY 448.66 AP-00299062 7/7/20 L0 N'ICOTHOBES,D,AV1D IOO.OU AP-00299062 717/20iD NICOTHODES,DAVID 15.00 AP - 00299054 7/7!2014 OCCCIPATIONAL FfEALTIi CEN"CERS OF CALIFO 185.04 r\P - 00299064 7/7/2010 OCCUPAT'fONA[_ HE.ALTI! CEN'I'E1LS OF CALIFG 68.62 .AP-O029906C> 7/7/3010 UPFtCEDEPOT 3,I<13.R3 AP - U02990(i(i 7/7/2010 OFFICE DEC'U`C 307.55 AP - 00299(166 7!7/2010 UF'FI(':E DEPOT 195.74 AP-0029906E 7!7/20'(0 OFF[CEDEPO"C 43.96 AP-40299066 7/7/2010 OFFICEDEPO'C 19.42 AP - 00.99066 7/7/2010 OFFICE DEPOT 1$6.38 AP -(10299066 7!7/2010 OFFICE DEPOT 16L94 AP - 00299066 7i7i2D (0 OFFICE DEPOT 126.23 .AP - D029906G 7/7/2010 OFFICE DEPOT 16.10 AP - 00299066 7/7/'_010 OFFICE DEPOT 20.42 AP - (10299066 i!7%2010 OFFICE DEPOT 25.33 AP - 00294066 7/7/2010 OFFICE DEPCT 157.77 AP - (1029)066 7r'7/2010 UFFLCE DEPOT 25.71 AP - 00299066 7/7i20t0 OFFICE DEPOT 15.86 AP - 00299066 7!712010 OF FILE DEPOT' 14.9D AP - 0029906(1 7/7/2010 OFFICE DEPOT 12.67 AP - (10299066 7'7/20 t0 OF'F[CE DEPOT 64.12 AP - 00299066 7!7/2010 OFFICE DEPOT 29.93 AP - D0299066 7i 7?2010 OFFICE DEPOT 4(13.34 AP - 00299065 7!7,2010 OFFICE DEPOT 169.17 AP - 00299066 7/7?20 [U OFFICE DEPOT 3(1.59 A['-0(1299066 7/7/241(1 (1FFICEDEPO"C 42.R5 AP - 002990(16 7!7120!0 OFFICE DEPOT I 1 L36 AP-00299066 7/7l20t0 C,tFF1CEDEPi>'1' 22.71 AP - 00299066 7; 712014 OFFICE DEPOT I t 3.69 AP - 00299066 7/7'2010 OFFICE D!?POT 42.85 AP-00299066 7;7/20[0 UFFICEDCPOT 387.98 AP - 00299056 7r7?ZOlO OFFICF. DEPOT 1.9.37 AP - 00299066 7/7/2010 OFFICE DE'PO'C 24:21 AP-00299066 7;7/20(0 OFF[CEDEPOT 603.71 AP - 00294056 7;7/2010 OFFICE DEPOT 24.15 AP - 00299056 7; 7;2010 OFFICE DEPOT 34.73 AP - 00299056 7!2'2010 OFFICE DEPOT 277.58 AP - 04299066 7/71201 O OFFICE DEPOT' 269.15 AP - 00299066 7/7/2010 OFFICE DEPOT 193.75 AF-00299066 7J7;201U OFF[CEDEPOT 1,307.21. AP - 00299066 7;7/2010 OFFICE DEPOT 64.60 :\P-00299056 717/2410 OFFiCEDEPOT 2U.S0 AP - 00299DC,6 7/7/2t110 OFFICE DEPOT 96.49 .AP - (10299066 7!7!2010 OFFICE DEPOT 4.46 AP - 00299066 7/7/2010 OFFICE DEPOT- 5.03 AP - (10299056 7i7J20!(I OFFICE DEPOT 17207 AP - 40299067 7/7!2010 ONTAR70 W (NNELSON CO 4.31 .AP-00299065 7/7/2010 ORONA,P.ATRIC[.A 1,035.00 A'P - 00299068 7/712010 URONA, PATR[CIA 690.00 .AP - 00299069 7r7/201U ORKISON, JODl 270.00 AP - 00294072 . ' ..__ ___ - 717,2010 . _ -- - PORCELLU ESTATE [3LJYERS _. .. _. . -- -------._.._..-._.._..-------------------- --- 35.00 ------- ---- . . ..P.. .. ~. ---.. --------_. -- - ----- Ctser: VLOPEZ - ~ eronica Lo ez . _ . .. --. ----- - Page: 24 Cun•ent Date: 07!14/2D1 Report:CK_AGENDA_ REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Regisier Poro ait Layout Time: 1 1:135 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAATONGA P-69 At*.enda Check ReL~ister 6/301?010 through 7,'1312010 Check No. C.htrk Date Vendor Name Amnunt AP-UO?99(173 7/7/2010 PROAQOTtONSTEES,AaMORE 2,408.7! AP - 00299073 7/?/2010 PROMOTIONS TEES K MORE 1,987.89 AP-002990?4 7r'7/20!0 QUAN,.lENN1FER 60.60 AP - 00299075 7/7/2010 RANCF[O CUCAMONGA EQUESTRFAN PA'CROL 905.99 r\P - 0(12990''5 '17!2010 RANCF{O CUC.4MONGA EQT.fESTAIAN PA"CROL 20.00 AP-00299076 7/7/20!0 RANDOM HOU5E lNC 3565 AP -00299076 7!7/2010 R4NDOM F{OLISE INC 35.68 AP-00299076 7!7120!0 RANDOME-10(JSEfNC 35.68 AP - 00299073 7/7/2010 RBF CONSULTING 7, 145.47 AP - 00299079 7/7r'2010 RI3M LOCK ANU KEY SERVICE 56.14 AP-00299079 71712010 FtI3ML.OCKANDKEYSERVICE 1b.31 AP - 00299080 7!7/2010 R.DO TRUST #80-5800 3;921.00 AP - 00299053 7/7/2010 RF WHITE CO (NC 686.33 .4P - 00299084 7/?/2010 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 35,607.43 AP-00299084 7/7/2010 RICtiAItDSWA'CSONANDGERSHON 49.80 AP-00299084 7/720!0 FiICHARDSWATSONANDGERSHON 597.60 AP - 00299034 7/7/2010 RICHARDS WA'CSON AND GERSHON 311.50 AP - 00299084 7!7!2010 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 1,765.50 AP-00299054 7%.2010 R[CHARDSWA'CSUNANDGERSHON 464.50 AP - 00299084 7/7/201(1 RICHARDS W,aTSON AND GF.RSHON 85 L00 AP - 00299055 7/7(2010 R[PPETOE MILES LLP 2,335.23 AF'-00299085 717,'2010 RLPPETOEMILESLLp 4,2!0.15 AP - 00299085 717,%20 LO R[PPL""TOE MILES LLP 24.55 AP-00299085 i;7%ZU[0 RFPPETOEMILESLLP 4,359.88 AP - 00299085 7/7/2010 RIPPETOE MILES LLP 1:975.02 AP - 00299081 7/712010 RLPPF_TOE MILES LLP 118.30 AP - 00299086 7/7/2010 R3M DESIGN GROUP fNC 9,691.90 AP - 00299086 717/2010 R.1M DESIGN GROUP 1NC 24,484.39 AP-00299037 71'1/20(0 RODRIGIJEZ,F..CIGENI<) 93.56 AP - 00299(159 7/7/2010 SAF3P R1PROGRAPF(ICS 7 76.75 AP - (10299089 7,'72010 SA13P REPROGRAPHICS 33(+.43 AP -0(1299090 7/7!2(1(0 SA<:H PFt.I'SHaAN Q(LLMG TI2tIST 35.00 AP -(10299093 7/7/2010 SC F[TF;:LS 4,749.97 AP -(10299093 7/7/2010 SC FUELS 13,4E,4.24 AI'-U0299094 7/7/ZOlO SCFCl2AUER,ALLiSON 247.50 AP - (30299095 7.7/20 I i) SEERY, SCC) f"C 518.1 I AP-00299096 7/7/2010 SHEAHOMGSLIMI'CF-,D PARTNFi,RSFFIT' 157.49 AP - 00299097 7/7/2010 SI TEAK LEy 141.90 AP-00299097 7,'7,'2010 SHEAKLF..Y IZ.00 AP - 00'_99097 717/2010 SHF-,AKLEY 32-4U AP - 00299097 7/7/2010 SHErVCLEY 5.40 AP - 00299097 7/7/2010 STiEAKLE\' 51.60 AP - 00299098 7172010 SHOETER.fA 92 97 AP - 00299099 7/7/2010 SHRED [T 34.00 AP - 00299099 7/7/2010 SHRL'D 1T 17.00 AP - 00299U99 7/7/2010 SIiRED lT 17.00 .4P - 00299099 7; 7/2010 SF-[RED IT 17.00 :1P - 0029910 i 7%712010 SLEEP DISORDER CENTER !NC 40.00 AP - 00299104 7/7/2010 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 1;263.27 AP - 002991 U4 7/7"2010 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 257.97 .4P - 00299104 7/7/2010 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 1,239.18 AP - 00299104 717!3010 SO CALEF GAS COMPANY 1,48558 .4P - 00299104 7;')!2010 SO CALEF GAS COMPANY 52.23 AP - 00299104 7/7,'2010 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 1;086.36 User: VLOPEZ-Veron ica Lopez Pape: 25 Current Date: 07/14201 Repro•t:CK_AGENDA_R EG_PORTRAI' C_RC - CK: Ageuda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 1 L 13:5 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P-70 A~~enda C:tteck Reirister 6/30/^_010 through 7/132014 Check No. Ctreck Datc Vendor Name Amount AP-UO299t04 7/7/2010 SO CALIF GASCOMPANY 4,093.08 AP - 00299104 7!72010 SO CALIP GAS COB4PANy 60.67 AP - 00299 f 04 7/7,'2010 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 119.54 AP - 00299105 7!7/20 (0 SOURCE GRAPHICS 72.3R AP-00249111 717:'2010 SOUTFIERNCALIFORNIAEDISON 972.63 AP - 002991 I l "7/72010 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 2L84 AP - 0029911( 7'72010 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EU[SON 20.38 Af' - OU299 t I E 7!72010 SOUTHERN C.ALIFORNL4 EDISON 24.41 AP-0029911E 7/72010 SOUTHERNCALTFORNIAEDISON 2257 AP-00299111 7/72010 SOUTI-IERNCALIFORN[A6DISON 23.45 AP - 00299111 7!72010 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 21.99 AP -002991 I I 7!72010 SOU'T'HERN CALIFORNIA EUISON 62.16 AP - 002991 i 1 7172010 SUU1'HERIJ CALIFGILN[A EUISON 32-S5 .4P - 002991 I t 7; 72010 SOUTHF.,RN CALIFORNIA EDISON '199 AP - G029911 I 772010 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDiSON 466.85 AP - 0029911 t 7; 72010 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 127.65 A P - 002991 I I T7/2010 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA F_D[SON 62.23 AP - 002991 l I 7; 72010 SUUTE{ERN CALIFORNIA ED[SUN 22.54 AP - 002991 { I 7!7;2010 SOUTHERN C.AL[FOP.MLA EDISON 26.72 AP - 002<I9l 11 7/7'2010 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ED[SON 26.86 AP - 002991 I t 7;1r?(110 SOUTHERN CA.L[FORNIA EDISON 86.18 AP - 002991 [ 1 7/7:'2010 SUUTIiERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.75 AP - 002991 t I 7/72010 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.06 AP - 002991 1 ( 7~"T2010 SOUTHERN CALiFORN1:1 ED[SON 2573 AP - 002991 I I 717!2010 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ED[SON 21.84 .4P - 002991 I I 7/72010 SOUTHERN CALIFURNLl ED[SON 2L84 AP-00299111. 7/7/20(0 SOUTHERN CAL[FORMA EDISON 81.97 AP - 002991 L l 7; 72010 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EUISON 21.99 AP - 002991 I ! 7/7!2A10 SOUTHERN CALfFORNL4 EDLSON 2I. [ I AP - 00299 € I I 7,'7/2010 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EUISON 22.54 .4P • 002491 I I 7/7!2010 SOU`CI-l1RN C.ALIFORNL4 I:DTSON 21.84 AP - 00299t 1 l 7/7/2010 SOU'C'HER.N CALIFORNIA F3DISON 25.90 AP-00299L1I 7/72010 50CP['HERN CALlFORNI,4 EDiSON 2.09 AP - 002991) ( 7/72010 SOIJ"fIiEKN CALIFORNIA EDISON 28.44 AP -002991 I ( T7^OIO SOC,J'PliLliN CALIFORNIA EGISON 36.37 AP-UO^99111 7:'7/2010 SOIJ'1'HERNCALI}'~ORNL4EDISON 74.88 AP - 002991 I l 7/7/2010 SOU'I'HI3RN CAL[F'ORNL4 [-D[SON 234•x' AP - 002991 i [ 7!7/2010 SOU"[1iERN CALCFORNIA EDISON 22.24 .4P-0029911E 7/7/2010 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON ''_1.84 AP - 00'_991 1 3 7/7/2010 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 208.53 AP - 002991 I l 7/7i<01.0 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.02 AP-00299111 7/72010 SOUTHERNCAL[PORNIABDISON 2!•84 AP - 002991 I 1 7!72010 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.02 AP - 002991 I 1 7/72010 SOUTFIFRN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.30 AP-00299111 71720(0 SOUTHER.NCALIFURN(AEDISON 22.73 AP-00299111 7/720L0 SOUT{iERNCAL[FORNIA EDiSON 23.30 AP - 0029911 1 7/7/2010 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ED[SON ! 13.24 AP -0029911 l 7;72010 SOII'TFIERN CALIFORNL4 EDISON 20.38 AP - 002991 I 1 7/7/2010 SOUTFERN CALIFORNIA ED[SON 6738 AP - 002491 1 I 7/N2U10 SOU'CFIERN CALIFORNIA EDISON t 13.98 AP - 002991 l 1 7/7/2010 SO(JTFIERN CALIFORNTA EDISON 363.37 AP -00299111 7/7/2010 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.71 AP-00299111 7/7/20f0 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIAED[SON 24.93 AP-0029911! 7/',2010 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIAED(SUN 127.58 Clser: VLOPEZ-Veronica Lopez Page: 26 Current Date: U7/14,~.01 Report:CK_,4GENDA_ REG_PORTRAC C_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Porh~ait La}'out Timc: I t a3:i CFTY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA_ P-71 Asertdx Check Resister 6!3~l20I0 throu~Ft 7!13(2010 Check Nn. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 002991 L I 7!7,'2010 SOUTHERN CALIFORNLA ED[SON 22.54 AP - 00299111 7/7/'010 SOUTHERN G.',LIFURNL4 EDISUN 28.21 AP - 002991 L I 7/7,2010 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISUN 23.30 AP - 002991(1 7/7/2010 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 138.41 AP - 002991 I 1 717;2010 SOUTHERN CA[..tFURNIA EDISUN 86.74 AP - 002991 (l 7/7/2010 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ED(SON 102.83 AF - 002991 1l 7172010 SOLJ9`HERN CALIFORNIA EDI,SON 21.99 AP - 0029911 I 7/72010 SOUTI-[£-,RN CALLFORNIA ET)TSON 23.30 AP-00^_99111 7/7/20 L0 SOL)THERNCALIFORNIAED(SOi.I 22.79 AE'-007.99111 7/712010 SOLI"THEI2NCAL:fPORNIAEDISON !09.65 AP-0029911E 7172010 SOL`THERNCAt,,[PORNLAEUISON 43.51 AP - (,1029911 I 717,'20(0 SOUTHERN CAL,Lf'URNIA EDISUN 21.84 AP - OU^_9911 t 7/7/2010 SOU`f"HERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.4R .4P-(1(1299111 7/?,'ZOlO SUUTHEFtNCALIFORNIAF..DISON 21.84 AP-0U299f11 7/72010 SOUTHERNCAC.IEORNIAEDI$ON 22.39 AP-00299111 7/7/20(0 SOUTI{ERNCALIFORNTAEUISON 68.82 AP - 00299! I l 7/7/2010 SOUTHERN CAL[FOR.N[A EDISUN. 52.63 .4P - 002991 I 1 717!20 t0 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ED[SON 75.98 AP - 00299111 7/72(110 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISUN 102.97 :LP - 002991 I I 7/7/2010 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISUN '22.5 7 AP - 002991 t t 7!7/2010 SOLTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.79 AP - 0029911 t 7172010 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ED(SON 23.30 AP - 002991 l t 7/7/2010 SOUTEERN CALIFORNIA EDISUN 24.17 AP-00299111 7172010 SO[1THL^RNCALIFORNIAEDISON 21.33 AP - 002991 I l 7/7/2010 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISUN 24:24 .4P - 002991 I 1 7/7,'20!0 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISUN 21.84 AP-00299111 7/7!2010 SC)LtTF{EIiNCALIFORNIAEU[SON 29.31 AP - 002991 I I 7/7/2010 SOUTFERN CALIFORNIA EDCSON 2330 AP -002991 I I 7,'7;2010 SOU'F'HERN CALIFORNIA EDISUN 58.88 AP - 002991 11 7(7/2010 SOU'T'HERN Cr1Llf''ORNL\ EDISUN 23.30 AP - 002991 t f 7/712010 S(}UTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISUN ? 1.84 AP - 002991 1 I 7x7!2010 SOUTEERN CALIFORNIA EDISUN 21.84 AP-00299111 7;7;2010 SOUTFIBRNCAI_TFORNIAEDISON 5758 AP-002991 L1 7;7/2010 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIAEDiSON 109.29 AP - 002991 I I 7/7x2010 SOU'TRERN CALIFORNL4 EUISON 25.80 AP - 002991 I 1 7172010 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EllISON 20.91 AP - 0029911 I 7/7/2010 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA1 ED[SON 56.62 AP -002991 1 1 7/7/2010 SU(THERN CALIFORNIA HDISON 20.60 .4P - 002991 I I 7/7/201 O SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISUN 20.80 AP-00299111 7!71201(1 SUUTHERNCALIFORNIAEDISON 41.93 .4P -002991 l I 7!7/2010 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISUN 10.92 AP - 0029911 I 7,'7/2010 SOCITHEItN CALIFORNIA EDISUN 21.12 AP-(10299111 ',1712010 SOUTHE.R.NCALIFURNIAED[SUN 24.61 AP - 002991 I 1 7/7r~(110 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.35 AP - 002991 I I 7;72010 SUCJ'FHERN CALIFORNIA ED[SON 21.84 Al' - 002991 I 1 7172010 SOUTHERN CAL[FORNG4 EDISON 144.89 AP - 002991 l l 717/20 k0 SUUTHERN CALIFORNf_A EUISON 24.40 AP - 0029911 I 7/720 f 0 SOLJTI{ERN CALIFORNIA EUISON 24.02 AP-00299111 7172010 SOUTF{ERNCALIFURNLAEDiSON 24.02 AP - 002991 i l 7/7/2010 SOUTHERN CALIFO[Ud[A EDiSON 3 L33 AP -002991 I I 7;7/2010 SOUTFiER.N CALIFORNIA EDISUN 26.32 AP - 0029911 I 7/72010 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ED[SON 23.52 AP-(10299111 717120[0 SOUTHERNCALIFORNLAED(SON 97.87 AP - 002991 I t 7/7!'_010 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EUISUN 53.73 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 27 Current Date: 07/141201 Report:CK_AGENDA_ RLiG_POR1'RAI T_RC - CK Agenda Cheek Register Portrait Layout Time: 11:13:5 CITY OF RANCHO CUCA1410NGA P-72 AgenCla Check Register 6/30/2010 through 7i 13:2010 Check No. Check Datc Vendor Name Amount AP - 002991 I 1 7/7/2010 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISUN 82.83 AP - 002991 I I 7/N2010 SOLITI{ERN C.4LIFORNtr1 EDISON 45.08 AP - 002991 t l 7/7/20!0 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 27.48 AP - 002991 ! ! 7/7/2010 SOUTHERN CALCFORN[.4 EDISON '4.02 AP - 0029911 1 7/7/2010 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ED[SON 24.30 AP - 002991 I l 7/7/2010 SOUTHERN C.ALIFORN[.4 EDISON 24.29 AP - 0029911 I 7/7/2010 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 86.62 AP - 00299111 7/7/201 U SOUTHERN C.4LIFORNL4 EDISON 25.83 AP - 002991 i 1 7/7/20 [0 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 40.32 .4P - 0024911 I 7/7!2010 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 21531 AP - 00'_991 t I 7!7/21110 SOUTHERN CAL[FORNE.A EDISON 32.76 AP - 002991 I I 7/7/2010 SUU'I'HERN CALLFORNL4 ED[SON ~ 32.76 AP - 602991 l l 7!7/2010 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ECLSON 23.36 AP - 002991 t I 7/7/2010 SOUTHERN CAL[FORNL4 EDtSON 2330 AP - 0029911 t 7/7/2010 SOU'T`HERN CALIFOIZ1vTIA EIJ[SUN 24.5.5 AP - 002991 f l 7/7/2010 SOUTHERN CAL.IPURNL4 EDISON 372.77 AP - 00?.991 t 1 7/7120 CO SUU'CHERN C'AL[FORNIA EDISON 23.78 AP - 002991 t 1 7/7/2010 SUUT'EiERN CALIFORNIA EDISON t05.69 AP - UO2y9111 7;7/2010 SOUl7-tHRN C; AL(FO[?'v'FA EDl5UN 76.36 AP - (102991 t 1 7/7/2010 SUUCHGRN CALC(30RNCA EDISON 40.31 AP - 00299 f I I 7/7/2010 SUUTF{ERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 50.21 AP - 00299111 7/7!2010 SOUTHERN CAC:[FORN[ri ED[SUN 2 LS4 AP - 002991 l l 7/''2010 SOUTHERN CAALIFORNLA EDISON 96.96 AP - 002991 I E 7/7/2010 SOtJTF{ERN CALIFORNIA EBISON 21:34 AP - 002991 l 1 7(7/2010 SOLITEIERN CAL[FURNFA HDtSON 58.58 AP - 00299E I l 7/7!2010 SOUTHERN' CALIFORNIA ED[SON 21.84 AP-U0299L11 7172010 SUUTHERNCALIFORNIAEDISON 67.40 .4P - 002991 l1 7/7/2010 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ED[SON 23.30 AP - 0029911 I 7/7120 f U SUUTHERN C.4LIFORN[A EDISON 100.69 AP - 00299111 7/7/20!0 SUCJTFIERN GALIFURNIA ED[SON 21.99 AP - 002991 l I 7/7/2010 SOUTHERN C.4L[FORNt.4 ED[SON '_ 1.84 .4P -00299(! 1 7/7/2010 SOUTHERN CALIFOR.N[A EDISON 39.96 AP - 002991 I l 7/7/2010 SOLt'CHERN CALIFORNIA. EDISON :3.96 AP - 002991 1 I 7;7/2010 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDiSON 23.59 AP - 602991(! 7;7 <010 SOUTHERN CALIPURNL4 ED[SON 32.87 AP - 002991 ([ 717/2010 SOUTHL=RN CALIFORNIA EDISON 39.92 AP - 0029911 t 717!2010 SOUTHERN CALiFURMA EDISON 68.83 AP-00299111 7;7/2010 SO(J'IHERNCALtFORN1AEDISUN 32.33 AP-002991.11. 7/72010 SOL`'T'HERNCAL,IPORNIAED(SON 28.37 AP - 0029911 L 71712010 SOLII'HERN CAL[FOKN[A ED(SON 20.84 AP - 00299111 7i7r2010 SOUTHERN CAC,CF'ORNCA EU[SON 24.73 AP-00299111 7/7/2610 SOUTHERNCAL[PORN[AEpiSUN 2L84 .4P-00299!11 717/20!(1 SOUTEIERNCAL[FURN[AEDISON 93.Ib AP - 00299 t l t 7/7/2010 SULiT[IERN CALIFORNIA EDISUN 22.30 AP-U0299ll1 7/7/20(0 SOUTHERNCALIF'ORNL4ED[SOIv` 21.34 AP -002991 I 1 7/7/20 CO SOLTHERN CALCFORNIA EDISON 21.84 .AP - 00299 t t I 7/7!2010 SOUTHERN CAL.IFORNL4 EDISON 108.41. AP - 002991 I I 7172010 SOUTHERN CAL[FORN[.4 EDISON 23.30 AP - 002991 I I 7/7/2010 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ED[SOA` 22.97 AP - 002991 I I 7(72010 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 97.97 AP - 002991 I ( 7/7/2010 SOUTKERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 58.53 AP - 002991 1 ( 7!72(110 SOUTHERN CALIFORNI4 EDISON 24.02 AP - 002991 I l 7/7/2010 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ED[SON 22.99 AP - 002991(1 7/72010 SOUTHERN' C:4L[FORN[A EDl5UN 22.49 User: VLOPEZ-Veronica Lopez Pegg: 23 Current Date: 07%L=%%201 Reporf:CK._AGENDA_ REG_PORTRAI T_RC - CK Agenda Check Re~isfer Portrait Layout Time: t ]:13:5 CETY OF RANCHO CCJCAMONGA P-73 At!enda C6cek Rez<icter 6/30/'!010 throueh 711 3120 1 0 Check No. CheckDafe Ve~e~lorName Amount ,4P - (!02991 I I 7/7/'2010 SOUTI{EK.N Cr1LlFOl2N[A ED[SON 21.34 AP-00299111 7/7/2010 SOUTHER)JCALIPORN[AEUISON 23.30 .AP - 00299L L l 717;2010 SOUTHERN C.4L[FORNIA ED[SON 19.40 AP - 002991 l ( 717/20 t0 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDl50N '3.52 AP-00299111 71720[0 SOU1'FIERNCAL[FORNIAEDLSON 7,R76.33 AP-00299111 7/?/2(110 SOUTHERN CAL(FOI2NIA ED[SON 14.05 AP - 002991 I 1 7/7/2010 SOUTHERN CALtFORN[.A EDISON 50.29 AP - 002991 ! 1 7/7120 f 0 SOU'1'HEiLN CALfFURNIA EDISON K)2. L 9 AP - 003991 [ [ 7/7,20 i0 SUUTEiERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 35.12 AP-00299111 7!7!2010 SOUTF[ERNCAL(FORNIAEUISON 125A0 AP - 0029911 l 7/72010 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 89.4? AP-0029911! 7!7!2010 SOUTHERNGtL[FORN[AED[SON 97.90 AP-00299111 7/7/201D SOUTHERNCrlL,IFORNIAEDISQN 21.57 AP - 002991(1 7/7/2010 SOUTHERN CALLFORNTA EU[SON 1x6.21 AP-00299111 7;7;2010 SOU'I'HERNCALIFORNIAED[SUN 22.06 AP - 00299 L l l 7/7/2010 SOUTFIP;RN C.4L[FORNIA BUISON 21.84 AP - 002991 I i 7.!72010 SOUTHERN CAL[FORNAI EDLSON 518.37 AP - 003991 1 I 7%7/2010 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EU[SON 21.84 AP - 002991 i 1. 7; 7;"_'010 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.73 AP-00299(11 7!720(0 SOIJTHERNC.ALIFORNLAED[SUN 138.40 AP-00299111 717,'20t0 SOUTHERNCALIPORNIAEDISUN 137.!9 AP -OD?991 i l 7/72010 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ED[SON 114.83 AP - 0029911 I 7/7/2010 SOUTHERN C.4LIPORN[A EDISON 143.97 :1P -002991 L I 7/,12010 SOU1'F[ERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 61.74 AP - 002991 t i 7/7/2010 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 46.44 AP - 002991 I ( 7,7,'2010 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 53.63 AP - 002941 l f 7!72010 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.02 AP - 002991 l l 7/72D t0 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 53.D2 AP - 002991 I L 7/7/2010 SOUTHERN C.4LIPURNIA EUISON G7.16 AP - OD29911 I 7;7/2010 SOUTHERN CAL.[FORMA EDISON 37.35 .AP - 002991 I I 717120 LO SOUTHERN CAL[FORN'iA ED[SON 27.67 AP - 00299 L l2 7;7/2010 SO[THERN CALIFORNIA REGIONAL RAIL AUTI 1,20(1.00 AP-00299113 7!72010 SOU"fHL.AND SPORTSOFPICIALS 1,196.00 AP - 00299114 7/7/2010 STERICYCLE INC 522.57 :1P - 00299114 7!7201D STERICYCLE lNC 599.16 AP-00299115 7,'72010 Sl1NRISEF'ORU 21,198.13 AP - 0029911! 7172010 THEATRICAL L1GHTlNG ft SCENIC SERVICES L 270.40 AP-002991 t7 7;7/2010 THOMPSUN PLUMBING SUPPLY (24.41 AP - 002991 18 7!7/2010 TOOMOTH, UR MICHELE PERSON 21.00 AP - 00299118 7;712010 TOOMOTH, DR M[CHL'-LE PERSON 16.13 AP-002991 i9 7/7!20 t0 TlJ'["I',MANDISA 3'297 AP-00299120 7/7/2010 UNIFLRSTUNIPORIv4SERVICE 844.26 AP - 00299121 7/7/20 t0 UNION BANK OF CAL.IFORN[A TR.US"LEE FOR P. 263.25 AP - 00299121 7!720! 0 [INION HANK OF CALIFORNIA "CRUS'fE[: FUR P, 3,02?,l I AF - 00299122 7/7,'20 f 0 CiNtON BANK OF CAL,IEORNIA TRUSTEE FOR FS 49,892.22 AP - 40299123 7%1,'2D1 U UNITED SITE 5ERVLC'ES OF CA LNC 10.69 AP - 00299124 7!7!2010 UPS 27.35 AP - 00299126 7!7/2010 VER[ZUN 5.07 AP - 00399126 7/72010 VER[Z,ON 42.80 AP-D0299126 7/7%2010 VERIZON 40?7 AP-00299126 7172010 VERIZON 42.80 AP - 00299126 7%72010 V F_R[ZON 42.80 :1P - 00299126 7/7/2010 VERl7-UN 40.27 AP-00294126 7/7/2010 VER[ZO'N 254,06 Clscr. V LOPEZ - V eron lca L.ope,z Page: 29 Current Uate: 07/14/201 Report:CK_AGENDA_R ,ECr_I'OR'['E'IAIT' _RC - CK: Agenda Check. Register Portrait Layout Titne: L ]x3:5 CYT~' OF' RA_VCHO CLJCAMOht:A P-74 Benda Check ReQiater fi;30/3010 thro~h 7/13/2010 Check No. Cfreck Bate Vendor Name Amonnt AP-OU29913<i ":x72010 VERt7UN 18.84 AP-00294F2fi 7/7;'3010 VER[ZON 40.?7 AF - 0029912E 7,'7/20 k0 VL"R(Z.ON 25.57 AP-Q0294726 7/7/29!0 V'ERFZON It4.7s AP-00399k26 7;7'20!9 VER[ZON 41.fi5 Al'-00299726 ?/?%2UIO VL;RIZON 215.43 AP-0029912E 7/7/2010 VERIZON 2,725A1 AP - 002997.26 7/7/2010 VF_RiZON 774.99 AF - 00299127 7%;12010 WARREN R CO LNC, CARL L,037.50 AP-00249127 7C?/2010 WAR.RHNNLCO[NC,CARL !,028.16 AP - 00299128 7/7/2010 WAT'S0N PAINTING CORPORATION 1,13080 AP - 00299128 7!72010 WATSON PA[N'CING CORPORATION 22,605.00 AF-00299129 7x'7/3U TO WA?:fESANFTA.RYSIJPFLY 1;947.5; AP - 00299129 7/720 i0 WAXFE SANITARY SCIPPLy 1[(108 AP-09294133 7!"7!20!0 VVONG,CHRIST[NE 425.00 AP - 00299134 7/720 [U kTREMIi DB'CATLING 300.90 AP - 00299134 717;2010 XTRE7v4E DETAELING 300.00 .4P - 0!)299135 7'72010 YOS"C PHOTOGRAP€i Y, CHERYL 35080 `.P-OU29^^>i36 7%7,'2019 ZEEMED[C,4LIPdC 63^^-.53 AP - 9029913E 7%7:2019 ZEF MIJDICAL INC 765.02 AP - 09294136 7l7rC010 ZEE iviP;DICAL fNC $35.30 ;VP-00299(37 7,x7/201(1 ZTR(iES,ARLENE. 78.00 AP - 00299138 7/8/3010 ABC LOCKSMITHS 150.00 AF - 00'_'99! 39 7%829 t0 AIRGAS WEST 194.16 AP - 00249142 7!8;2010 BRODAR'C BOOKS 25.40 AF-00249!42 7/8/2010 BROD.4RTBOOKS 14.k3 AF - 90294142 7l8/x_010 BROUART 8O0KS l O 1.17 AP - 00394142 7!8,'2010 BRODART BOOKS 114.38 AP - 00299 L42 7F8/20I0 BRODAKT' BOOKS L4.68 AP - 09299142 7/82010 BRODARI' BOOKS 79.19 AP - 00299142 7!8/20 (U BRODAR'T,' F3O0KS 2A~.47 AI's-06299!42 7/3/2010 BRODARTBOOKS 24..13 AP - 00249142 7182010 BRODAR'i' I3O0KS 9.74 AP - 00299142 7'82010 i3RODART BOOKS 41.54 AP-00249142 7!8x2010 BRODARTBOOICS 33.26 r'~P - 00249142 7'8/2019 BRODAR'C BOOKS 31.23 AP - 00299 (43 7/82010 BRODART BOOKS 16.63 AP - 00249142 7; 8/2010 BROL)AR"C BOOKS 233.52 AF-00294142 7i820k0 BROD.4R'I'BOOKS 20 Q2 AP - 09294142 7/8/2010 BRODAR"F BO(1KS 6.64 .4P - 09299142 7/Si2010 BROD.4RT BOOKS 4.51 AP - 00299142 7!8/2010 BRODART BOOKS 27.0(1 AP-90249142 7/82010 BRODART'BOOKS 4.02 AP - 00299 (42 7,~820I0 BRC}DART BOOKS 4.51 AP-00299142 7!8,'20!(! BRCIDARTBOOKS 9.03 AF - 00299142 7/8/2910 BRODART BOOKS 4.S I AP-00299!42 7!8/29(0 BRODARTBf)C)KS 4.51 AP-00299142 7!8.%2019 BRODARTBOOKS 13.5; AP-00299142 7/8/20Ip BRODARTBUOKS 6.b9 AP - 00299!32 7!8/2010 13RODAR'T' BOOKS 35.93 AP-00394142 7;8.'2010 BRODARTF3O0KS 3L57 AP - 00299142 7'8/2010 BROE3ART BOOMS =1..51 AP - 00399142 7; 8/2010 BRODART BOOKS 8T.19 AP - 00249142 7/8/2010 BRODART BOOKS L3.54 Uscr:VLOPEZ Veronica Lopez Page: 30 CnnentDate: U7/14..U1 Repo rf:CK_AGENllA_ R1.G_FORTRA[T _RC - Cdi.:.Anenda Check Register Fow<zit L;ayottt Time: 1 I :13:5 CITY OF RANCI-IO CUCAMONGA P-75 Al~enda Check ReEister 6/sor_olo ~rnugh 7/13nOTO Check Na. Check Uate Vendor Name Amonnt .4P - 00299142 7/R/2010 BRUDART BOOKS 9.74 AP-00299142 7/8.!2010 BRODARTBOOKS 33?6 .AP - 00299142 7;8/2010 BRUDART BOOKS ? 12.26 AP - Q0299142 7/5f2D 10 BRUDAR'P BC)OKS L5.66 AP-U0299L12 7/3/2010 BRODARTBOUKS 25.40 AP-00299142 7/S/2010 BRODARTBOOKS 19.24 .AP-00299142 7/8/2010 BRODARTBOOKS 15.83 AP-00299142 7/SF2UIU BRODAR"['BOOKS 100.09 AP - 00299142 7/3/2010 BRODAR.T BOOKS 14.69 AP - 00299142 7lSf2010 BRUDART BOOKS 41.23 AP-00299142 7/8/20 k0 BRODARTBOOKS 228.85 AP - 00299142 718/2010 BRODART BOOKS =16.45 AP - 00299 t 42 7/g/2010 BRUDART BOU6S 15.82 .AP-00299142 7/8/2010 BRODARTBOOKS 6650 . AP - 00299142 7!8/2010 BRODAR"[' BUUKS 60.84 :1P - 011299142 7/8/2010 BROD:IRT BOOKS 296.19 AP-00299142 7i8,f2G10 BI20DARTBUOKS 97.84 :1I' - 00299142 jig/2(110 BRUDART' BUUKS 44.07 4P - 00299142 713/20 { 0 BP,ODART (3UUIiS 25.83 AF' - 00299142 7;8~'20I0 BROD.4RT IIUOKS 27.36 AP - 00299142 7!8/20 f 0 BRUDART B00[{S ~ 70.08 aP - GU299 f 42 7!g/201U BRUDART' BOOKS 78.40 AP-00299142 7/8!2010 BRODARTBOOKS ISa4 AP-00299142 7/8;2010 BRODA.RTBOOKS tfi4.27 AP - 00299142 7/8/2010 B120DART BOOKS 24.43 AP - 00299142 7/3/2010 BRUDART BOOKS 24.47 AP-00299(42 7/5/''010 BRODARTBOOKS 26.43 AP - 00299142 7/3/2010 BRUDART BOOKS 6.69 AP-00299142 7/S/20(0 BRUUARTBOUKS 6.69 AP - 00299142 7/8/2010 BRODAR'C 600KS 4.51 AP - 00299142 7/S/'_U f 0 BRODAR"t' BC)OKS 6.69 AP-00299L42 7/3/2010 BRODARTBOOKS 9.02 AP - 00299142 7/S/2010 BRUDART BOOKS 127.11 AP - 00299142 7!8/2010 BRUDART BOOKS 13.53 AP-00299142 7/8/2010 BRODARTBOUKS ~ 4.51 AP - 00299142 7/8/2010 BRODAR'I' BOC)KS 29.24 AP - 00299142 7(8/2010 BRUDART BOOKS 451 AP - 00299142 7;8/2010 BRODART BOOKS 76.67 AP - 0029)142 7/8/2010 IIR.OD,4R'C BOOKS [ t.20 AP - 00299142 7/5/2010 BRODART BOOKS 4.51 AP - 00299142 7/8/2010 BRUDART BUUKS [5.71 AP - 00299142 7!S;2010 (3RODAR'C BOOKS 15.04 AP - 00299142 7/8/2010 BRUDART BUUKS 81.18 AP - 00299142 7/8/2010 BRUDART BUOK.S 13.53 AP - 0029914' 7/S/2(110 BRCID.ART BOOKS 13.53 AP - 00299142 Z'S/2010 BRUDART BOUK.S 9.02 AP - OD29914^_ 7/3/20 t0 BRUDART BOOKS 6.69 AP - 00299142 715,!2(110 BRUDART BUUKS 15.04 AP -00299142 7,'3%2010 BRGD.ART BOOKS 33.60 AP - 00299142 7!8!2010 BROD.ART BOOKS 4.51 AP - 00299142 7/8/2.010 BROD,4RT BOOKS 47.13 .AP-00299[42 7/Sr0i0 BRUDART BOOKS 4.51 AP - (10399142 7/3/2010 BRUDART 6UOKS 451 AP - 00299142 7/Sl2010 BRUDART BC~KS 4.51 User: VLOPEZ-Veronica Lopez Page: 31 Current Date: 07/14/201 ReportCK_AGENDA_ REG_PUR'I'RA[T_RC - CK:.A~enda Check Re~isier Poruait Layoui Timr. 11:13:5 CITE' OF R4NCH0 CUCAIVSONG.4 Agenda Check ReEister 6%30x2010 throw 7113/20)0 P-76 Check No. Check Elate Vendor Name Amount AP-00299143 7/8/2010 CALSENSE 1,580.86 AP - 00299144 7!82010 DAPPER T[RE CO 594,64 AP-00299145 7!812010 F_MCORSERVICE IQ669:46 AP - 00299146 7'fiiZOlO F1ULL[DAY ROCK CO LNC 22S.R5 .4P-U0299(4fi 7!5201.0 FiOL.UU.AYROCKCO[T4C 50.(10 AP - 0029914lr 7:`8!3010 F10LLIDAY ROCK CO LNC 587.35 AP - 0(1299146 9:812010 HOL.L(DAY ROCK CO [NC 3fiG.88 .AP - 00299146 7!812010 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO I?v*C 150.00 AP - 00299/16 7/8/2010 HOLL.LD.AY ROCK CO INC' 597.04 AP - 00299146 'r8?Z010 EtOLL[DAY ROCK CO iNC 1,018.7-6 AP-002991~I6 7%812010 H.OLLIDAYR<)CiCCOINC (,166.42 .4P - 00299147 7/8/2010 - MO'fUROLA 20,938.74 AP - 00299148 7!8x20] 0 SCJNRISE FORD 69.80 AP - 00299148 7!R/2010 SUNRLSE. FORD 1,250.83 AP - 00299 L4R 7l8~'2010 SLRQR[SE FORD 1,049.62 AP - 00299148 7x812010 SUNRISE FORD -`t2 73 AP-00299149 7!8/2010 TRUGREGNLANDCARE 677.85 AP-00299149 7/8/2010 'fRUGREEN LANDCARE 2,R35.20 AP-00299149 ?.!8/20(0 TR_UGREENLANDCAR6 9,`31.29 AP-00299149 7!8!20(0 TKCtGREENLANDCARE I(i3.64 AP - 00299149 Z'S.2010 't'RUGREEN LANDCARE 177.20 AP-00299149 7!8,'2010 TRUGRBENLANDCARE 1,700.64 AP - 00299149 718/2(1 l0 'fRUGR.EEN LANDCARE 1;293.61 AP - (J0299I4A 7;8!2010 TRt1GREEN LANDCARE 1:_'41.57 'tots! for Check [P AI': 3,074,073.27 EP-(10001187 7.1%2010 CAL.IFGOVERNMENTVEBA/RANCHOCCICAM< 1,125,(10 EP-00001187 7il/2010 CALIF GOVERNMENTVEBA/RANCHOCUC:AMC 515.00 EP-00001190 7il/2010 SOLOMON,LASHONpA I63A0 EP - 00001 191 7!712(1 l0 SAN BERNARDJNO CTY SHERIFFS DEPT 2,149,917.00 Total for Check [D EP: 2, 151,525.00 T'ot:il for Entiiy: 5,225,598.27 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 32 Current Date: 07114!201 Reporl:CK_AGENDA_REG_POR'fRAf'f_RC - CK:.Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 11:13:5 A C O E S U r U A C +' O ~ m V d ~ O U ~ ~ n O t6 V) c V ~ O ~ Q O ~ ~ ~ ~ ooa ~. a U OU °z~ < "S .., i ~`J` F Y 'i ~W' W O ~ O m~ of f N m n ~ g l n N b O N N ~ ~- N A N O H pOp WNW mm O h I ~ N ~O ~O O N m O O N N O N N O, ~ h m r r ` b m n a ~ l m W 10 h O b O o M N ~ O H la O O H N O N O ~ m m W o o a ~ = < N f . G e O C N fV ~ O 0 N h O ° a tp o b W o O r N o P O j j O' ~ O N O~ N O N !O ~(1 y 0' h N S Nj m~ p C O 4 r A h fnt T N N E _ CI W O W N N CO Q COi N 10 N p1 ' i b ~ h O 01 (D ~' O N 10 ' N ' N y m Y ~ ~ O ap 7 m n ye ~ °o, t p m M N N f of m o m ri r N~ 0 0 0 N u S ~ N YI N T O O O O N O O S O l 0 0 0 0 0 1 W N S O ~ ~ 0 ~ ry N N m A a °v O m c y C A m O N r g g ~ p d .~ ~ U N ~ ^ U 2 ~ v ~ ~' ~ o d 'a ~ y A $ ~ rn y '¢ 9¢ a ; of E ` E a m WX m d . > ~ o i y 3 U ~ r ~ (7 ~ m `m D m Q C Ol Ol ti N N m ~ o ~ ~ E n yo U d 0 ~ d C OI C O ~ O C a K i m m n ~ c N A C V O N d d N m o~ a c v c- N C UQ~ y ~ A 6 t X~ 2 a o U w ~~ U aSG d V! ~K .y~ C N v ~ t d c ~ o ~ a ^~ E c ma C c o ~ - ~ L ~ y C a O ~ E a y e O L n'r L r C y O N m E y m 3 0 > C y c y g n a 5 y n O m M a N r h j~ O O y V_ Q N O y a n of mL N E N r X ' N y ~ > n % c o y ~ v c 0 d y ~ m ~ o 4 y. v om U ~ ~ T _ °a ~ a e n'~ c ~ IO M N m b N c O y= a ~ re r E 3 m n t0 A ~ C O ° M a O 5 h n h ID W N O N ~ c 5 a ~ L_ y W ~ ~ ~ y O t y C E O o`m a ` E p _> o ~ o ~ c ~+ m ~ ~ n O - L \ N y y y e C y ~' W ~ y ~ y C'll`h 1 t0 h O- Ol N N m C F L C C ~ O N N by E n Q M m N N C _ p~ ~ m O N O N y M N m ~a c Ol e. ~ L r O O d ; nEU y C y O U m '^ -cam m E m- v .>_ ~ m C y F ~ C y ~ -a m W a C C C w m E -'- m U m m~ n a m m U C A ~ E O O O ~ ~ rv m n' - v E E m O n(n~ ~m ~ r ~ L N O C N tO I~ ~ n ~ ? a a E t i } t m ` m m 8 . C y q > ~ r"I m 3 .Z"O y m E ~ ~ ~ E ~ v > 3 I,U i Q W _Qi IL-m P-77 F U ~ O f > O 6~~i C 2 N o arc a ~ u N M Q 0 0 N O m ~ O iti 0 0 a c a o 0 1' z' r - m ~ 0 m q a f ~~ Z r r W ~' q ~ m m ~ Y N If1 O O b a 0 0 ' N " r 0 N ~ N ~ C O C d E °' ~ ~ E V d ~ O 3 ~ C p (~ C I N O cf6 tll M C ~~ 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ w ~ o a v a° ~~ R LO 6 a mi o- Qf ~. ~' H z 1 U 2 V a J C LL O C F 0 a> u C a o tm W J N P-78 ~- I ^ m m N m N' N m m b^ ~ " N N (V ' I'1 N b Q O m' d m^ a N O ~ O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N O O O O O O O O O ~ U n _N ~V N N ~V ~V £I ~V N ~V b V N N `` ~`! N N N N ~~VV N N N L N ~ N N N 63 YI A A U d y N O C Cl 0 O fJ [O'~ 10 ( p Y S ^ N d O N N N p N ~ O O r ry O 2 ~ vI ~'! 13 !D ~ 13 ~ < N 10 _ ~p ~ ~ Jf [~ 1~ (7` CJ O ~ ~ M ~ R 0 N f'` ~ ^ o o W W o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O o o ~ 0 0 0 0 p I ^ N^ n N O l7, W O ' O O m m 1- fO C'] N W Q N 1~ N m W O N O ~p L~ O O d K N p N m W W 1~ 1 N N 1D C r I~ A A O O tt) N O+ a`J O N A ] N ' N m O W 0 0 N m N I` (p t~ N C I~ N 0 N a ~ O 10 +O h O p p O O O O H O O h O' O N O O 10 O N A O O m N m S O N d W (p O fp j 1 p 1 O 1D N N N O^ m m W m O ~ (O ^ N N W tG N W N JI O m O O (O N [7 N N m (D N ( b N N N V N m ^ ^ N f m N N N ^ m 1 V ^ N N m m N N Q m ^ N d ^ ry ry ryry ry ry ry ry ry q ry ry q ry q ry ry Q ~ ry ) ¢ a a¢ a Q K Q a 6 Q 6¢ a 6¢ 6 a 6 6 Q a¢ a Q¢ 8 0 O N S O N N O N O O N h N A S S r 0 O O~ O^ m S NO N S 1~ t0 1O N O f0 O O O O b O m VI N 0 a7 N N N N N N N N m^^ N N YI N m N r m N^ N N m N N m^ N 0 0 0 0 o a o o W o 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 o n c o 0 0 ° 0 0 ° 0 0 0 o m o g o 0 0 0 0 0 o o 0 0 0 ~ o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O o d o c o vi o o o o a o 0 0 c o c o o vi o g ° ° ° o ° ° 8 O ~ } N OI 10 S O S S O O S o o o O O O Cnt ~ O O S N n O O O O o o O m Q 8 8 8 W p t W N N q Of Q OI S 8 0 0 O O d O OW1 O P. O ~[1 Of N O l O O O ~ N O O W O I _ d m f'1 ^ , N (V Y O N r' N^ N N m N Q^^ N N (V N m 1V m N m S O A O S S O d o O O N O S S S O O O O O O H N N O O O O O A N O S m O O O N - N W 1 q O O N O O S O N ~ p p ^ N b 1~ N O i ' O 1~ V O 4 ro m O N W 1~ O N r O n N O m O O O W W 0 p M N m Ip N I + m N 10 N 1~ A O A m I(1 ti^ O W O W A O N m O O fD f0 ^ (7 ^ ^^ Q (p 1p fO N N ^ S O O N W N N N O O^ 0 0 O ~^ m O Q O 0 0 O^ N O N O N O O O N O N O O O p Q m N N N Q Q N N N N N m m N N^ N N (V N m t7 N m m d 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $ ° ° 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a. 0 o, o, c d o 0 0 0 0 o g S ° o 4 o 0 o S o °o °o ° S ° $ g o S ~ °o°o o °o °o0 0 00 ~ 8$ W 0 0 0,00 000_ qoo 0 0 0 w d o 0 0 0 0 o c o 0 0 0 0 0 0 o d o 0 0 0 0 O N S p 'l S S O O p YI O N N O N O O O O O O O O O N N D O d m N 1 S N N d Q N N ~~ m N N N m N N N N N m lJ l7 1'J d N 1~ d OI O O O O O O O O r 0 0 W W O O O O O Gl W W CI O O 0 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 o W o 0 0 0 0 o a o N N N {V W o 0 N ~V N N N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N N N ~' N N N ~V N N N N N N 0 0 N N N 'p 1~ VZ m m~ W 1 p ~ ~~ ~ N ~ ~ Q O O N ~' h 0 N p 0 o a g N O o 0 0 0 o S O _ _N O ~~ nn N o 0 0 ~ a o a o 0 0 0 0 0~ o 0 0 0 m a a a s a a 0 0 0 0 0 0 m U U U U U U ui lop Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y (.7 (7 C7 W S W g ^ 2 2 2 2 Z Z Z Z 2 2 Z Z Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y ~' ~~ 1' ~~ ~ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ f ~ m ¢ Q ¢ QQ a a Q m 9 m m m m ¢ ¢ Q Q Q Q Q Q Q 0 0 0 9 m Q Z 2 0 0 0 t0 o ¢Q m~ m m m m m m m m~~~ E~ f p LL r H F H a o 0 0 H F F F F f- 0 0 0 o S o F- H 0 5 z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z w w w w w w w w w w w w¢ a¢¢¢¢¢ a a¢¢¢¢ a a a Q C K C G K¢ K tt K K ~ K 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U U U U U V U V U U U U V J J J J J J J LL ~~~~ ~~~~~~ ~~ W W W W W W W W W W W w W W W W O o ~ K K K K K ¢ K K K K K ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ E ~ ~ y rn ¢ q¢¢ ¢ Q a¢¢¢ ¢ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Z ~ LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL S 2 2 2 2 S 2 2 2 S 2 2 2 2 2 2 a d J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J m < 4a 4a Qa qn ¢4 ¢4 qa 4a 4a 4a 4a rc 4a 4a 4a 4a 4a 4a ~ QLL ~ qa 4a 4a 4a K qa qa z a w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w = o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Z A W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W ~ S LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL O Y d _ ~ C N O m a m o U Z W W 1~ W If) f A W W N W O O ^ N N m N d m tD N m 0 N t0 ^ NV f0 N t0 A O N N N m m m W m W N m 0 O^ 1.. m h W em. O ~ m ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r d m O d N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ d ~ ~ ~ ~ - d ~ ^ N W O r ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . O vl 6 _ ~u ~ T o ~ m ' ~ ~ m ' U m m A ~ Q mm Z 2 4 LL Z i a > N J Q U 10 U ~ LL t i. I.~ K f Y J 2 LL N x O Y 5 N L U ~ ~ 'l ~O m -' -S -Y -Z O m 1n K C> O v i ~> Q i t iJ 3 m m ~i m m ( X i . i 1 xxxxxxxxxx><xx xxx ~ N m m ' M m 'm 1m'1 1m'1 M N N m N N N 0 ° ~ +l m m I] t f i C ) C l m m 1 m m m m^^ ^ ' f ` m n ` n m i n n n U W w 1n n in In 1h n in n m m n m 1n 1o n 1 m m m m m n 1 ~ 0 a a' °n w W m a m W O a N P-79 N ~~ b N V N N N N N ` O b P M N M ` ` N ry o 0 0 0 0 0 o p 0 0 0 O o o ~ 3D N N N lV ~ ~ N (V N N_ N N N_ \ a W s ~ N f0] O ~ Q (U b N~ N N m N N O ,;, r „ 3 0~ o 0 0 0 0 0 0° a o ~~ t Q' O M O Ol O (O 0 N O m o m N W ~ b OI N n m e m n O O 10 m n M A N N N n o m a m O n b , m , ' _ ) q 0 ~ O O O b O O O n O O O N O O O S N 0 m m Y O O O N h O N O N m N b N S O (p O n r N 1D ~ M N N lJ N N N M M N N ~ t'I Y! W A W W W W W W W W~ W~ W a ¢ ~ ~ ~ Q ~ ¢ ~ ~ ¢ ¢ 4 ¢ ¢ ~I m A N C O C d R ~ y O 7 ~ C O V C 1 N O N N O L ~ M R C O y ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ w O ~• a° ~ U a a° n ~ W u~ a' m a mt m ~ ¢~ 8 O N O N 0 0 0 O O O b O O O ~fl O fD ~ N b N O O m O h n of M N N M N N N [`I 1") M N N O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 O N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O Vi b O S S S S O O N O O O O O D ~ Np pN O O O O O O N O O O O O O i(1 O O O O O O p O S T O O O O O O m 1+1 P S S S S N O O O O O O O S W 001 N N M O ~ l7 N (") ^l N O N ~ N ppp O S N S N N O O N O O O S ( Np d m N b b N O N N f ~ O N n^ O 0< V b < M fD M y N N M < m O O O H O Y) N S O O O O O O O O < N N M O ~ M ~ N M M N O N N ry O O O O S S S S S S O O S O O O O O O O °o S S g o °p °o °$ o S_ °p_ S O S S g 0 0 0 0 0, 0 0 o' o o g g o$ o o a °p °o °o o °o °p S O O O O m N O O O O O O O O O Y N N M Y ~ M ~- N N M N O N N ry 0 o p p o o O81 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N N N l~`I N N N N N N N [`I O .n cl1 o a rn m m m m m~ 0y1 C uNT O O 0 0? O O O O O O O O O O i a a ~? K 2' K n 0 O fV w ~ ~ ~ m' O O O z z z z z z z z z z z ^' ~_ g ~_ N N y N y N VJ N N N N ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ U' (7 U' (7 C7 f7 V' U' U' C7 O O O O E f~~~ f~~~~~ w ~ ~ ~ F 1- 1- D_ O_ O¢ 4¢¢ Q¢¢ 0 0 0 Q Z a 2 2 Z Z Z Z Z Z Z 2 2 Y E J J J J J J J J J J J K m w w w w w w w w w w w w w w~ ~ ~ O O O O O D ~ O O O O o a W W W W W W W W W W W W W W R' W LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL f R c L O V' 6 O ~p U N M M M~ m m O O O' N N C] O m ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N U C p W M b n W P F m U' U' ~ ~ _ _ _ } W ~ m ~ w m X CyJ CpJ LL (LLp 1LLp LLp (LLp m W LL mLL {LLp ~ N ~ N< 17 S C1 m Ih C] M M S C] Cl M N LL ~ m M M M M M M M n e~ 1`n i~ m a P N m A m y O N N M M mM r O O N N r r IV N ¢I ¢I °p I o O N N b a' s a a) a a B L i i n i sin i rn m O O 0 0 n 1nW ~ ~ N b S N s N O 0 M N f 0 A ~i~ 0 N p 0 °o b ~i n P d r O Z m Y i C ~ ~ ¢ a a' m r ~ E N C O a O n V ~ W d (A ~ m W N ` N 1- m p 0 U_ ~ ~ n H M f/1 N O N w 3 U = m 2 a w ¢ ~ c K W 9 a N r V O fL a v O C ~ m m N b ¢ N a O LL U LL O W Y w <Z 61 > z ¢ O v z `m ~ S ~ o ~ a °u h U Q W m m d W C C W 0 C °a N Q U' N b O A m 0 N r b w m N N u m a m 0 '- ran F U ,~ O O LLI t K a° '- i b 0 O C m m a E L' n L `~ m O f 'E o O pQT n v 8- S ~d' N O N 0 m 7 n N 1~ 1 i M S i N N C '~ L O C N N ~ ~ V o U O 3 ~ N O („ ) C N O R " o t g 0 ~ C O O C ~ O w ~ w ~ L' ~a°a° U a a' m g Q m ei 0 N II N N m °o N_ O 0 S z 0 LL J Q U LL Z m O Z L O U u Q m° m ~ °o O m C _N 0 G N ~ ~ m C o > N M N 5 a' 'm p~ W q n N S 0 V N m a Q m n b N a N N A a m cm D m m c D W L N u_ O F P-80 ~ U ~ U O E o a ~ a d d a h 0 0 m 7 K P-81 m a N C O w R G C ~ m C d m ~ ~ ~ O 7 ~ = O U = 'v a O R m O V ~ d ~ C ~ ~ C N '~ "') O p ~ .~` ~- o U ~p 0 a i 0 0 N W N N O O G Fy ~ ~ w' E m m I o $ N p CI _ ° ~ ~ ~ € ~ sd E o °c m N 1 - R. . n c a °o a 0 s 0 J Q U LL Q Y 2 Q m 2 O 2 Y C N m O ~ a W m Z .% 6 N ~ o N O m ~ m H u Y m U U U r r o f > d z r ~ ~ o u ¢ a a a N d C v v z' n ~Pa82_ U ~ m U n ' a ° d o i~ ~ ¢ d O C K a ~ LL C U a S b 0 S 1m~, 9 N m C m m p W m > O o ~ n n m M P O W b W N A W? ~ ~ n i W N O O ' 0 O O O O O S O S S O O O O S O O O O O p O n C~ O G p p O O O 6 W O O O O 1p N N N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 O S I~~I S N N O N m O m p m W O O W dt O m W w m W N N a. ~ `. o v o .- m ~ rd m m ~3 a ~ .- a _ r r.- 0 b~ S S 00SS 5000000 S 0 G O R W 0 O C C O C p0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O C 0 0 0 S O O ~ o o L 6 0 O! 0 0 0 m O O O O O O O i O N ~ d O $ $ ~ o S S S o m ~ 6 0 m rn + I Y 1` A j ~ ~' N" N N N N t l ' O ~ M ~ i ~ a I ~ m ~ 3 ~>n ~ ~ 10 ~ r U T C ~ O R Ca 7 ~ t ~ O c m o 0 0 0 0 O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 („~ ~ ~ ~ d O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O y ^ O ~ N 0 w O ~ ~ p ~` N Q O N N t7 A N O o~ 8~~ Ba ooh g Q: ~ a o 8 ~ ~Q c r r• O O N N N S O S O ` / r a m O N V I ~ m O N S 00 O O N m N O O • N /~ VY iL d q N N rv ry n N N O ~ O O ^ N N t7 N N N ~ ~ N U ~ h c ~ ~m P O b m~ O ~ ~ ~ m N K K K K b ~ p ~ c q ~ r ~ 0 0 0 O m ~ ~ ~ i m m m ~ U U V U ~ ~ ~ I m ~ n Y Y Y (~ U' U' O b m ' ^ a g ~ Z Z Z Y Y Y Y . . _ P Z N Z _ _ _ ~ d ~ a Q Z 2 ~ 0 ~ Q ^L ] I Z N Z . ~ 6 Q QQ Q< Q¢ f y~ m m m m E~~ ~ F a O ~ ~ H y N m ^ O O Z Z 2 2 2 Z 2 2 0 0 0 LL N J W W W Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q J Z U ¢¢¢ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 r r r ~. V ~ m m ~ LL ~~~ W W W W W W W W ~~ E LL ~ o o ¢¢¢ f f E~~~~~ r r r _ ~ E z 9 Y 3 a a a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0~~~ 2 Z ~ m O ~ E Y Z 3 . E W CJ Q 2 O LL LL LL S S L S S S ~ O ~ O Q s J J J J J J J J J CJC QJQ QJQ QJ d d ~ (/f ~ {] N J ' N Q QQ Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q K K K K K K K K K K C K K N N R N ~' Z N E y c 2` Q v m Z O w w W W W W W W w w W W W w ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ E . ~ SJ ~ m $ m o i w w w w w w w w w w w w w c Z m o O 7 LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL ? ~ 7 O N .. g s E ~ ~ c o r ~ m ~ m > i~ o o' ~w C !L W O d ~ V c A O U O v a m ' ~` d ~ O Z V O O N M O ~ P W N of m (d n m h C9 m W W W W m W C's m W W m O ~ -~ > O O 0 ~ v N P O ~ ~ r O O Q M ~ ~ ~ ~N V m O S E 0 ~ ~~ - ~ C I m o ~ m ~ i Im Ia m iy m n ro ~ i m m C i O i T I V 3 0 T O C U Q O O C m O mm (~ Q m Q m O N N ' N m c m d G o v ~ O i Y1 LL I( I C~ m T W X U O w w C7 V' p ~ 7 O ~ ~ ~ O m a ~ m r` ~ ~ W¢ K r fr rm> mm x s ' ' ~ ~ C ;u _ a ( n m S o m U LL LL n X X X X X U W W S ~ c 'm P m N N f7 M CW] CmJ M COI Cl f l N m 1 ~ ~ 7 O J C Y m '' f ` ~ m ~ ~ U J N U r LL n m m ~ m W M n n m m N m N f 41 m K m a O r O ~ N O C ~"~ C N N V ~ T ~ 7 M- V L a ~ O ec LO 7 V ~ « C O_'> ~ ~ O v ~ ,~ '.~ Q o ~ ~ N ~, a r U °' C 7 wm cu ac wW m m 0 ~i N n r N A C ~ ~ n n _; N b A Q A A t f~ N fV O a ~ ~ 3 z ry 0 - ; i i ?= I ~o ~ ~ o aN W N 0' O N cu °o ~~ N C ~00 ~ m m N m N a c E m 'e a U N 0 O a 3 ~' z O Q U ~ m Z o I ~ a 0 Z N _O Z C O u Q m m I ~ m 9 C C E m P E N O v N O a e e m O r ~~ U o f - a o i C ¢ o n a s a ro O ^o m D R P-84 N C m Q o N O LL N b m t O O 3 ~ E y c p EI 'J J 9 U O O V C U ~ W c - L_ ~_ C c O t ~ ~ m U () O LL r E E r'n O N O ~- O O N O N itl O N m N N O JI U j a) o e 01 0 0 0 > o o a _D y ~ Q Q Q m pR Z Z Z 0 '^ m m m t :; rn rn m ~ N J o v `a a a m '° '° v ~E a a a N C_ C C_ d J ~ LL LL LL C p W N {' LY Y ~ ~ ~ T T T c c c 0 0 0 M I~ W N lp O 1D lp t0 O N N O N M O M O M N < V N ~ N N ~' O O V N W ~ M N N ~ N N N O W O M I~ N N O W M M rn $ 'p 1~ N (O N O lG n r O O W r N Yl N C W I~ (O (U rn W ` M ~ rn rn W ~ h M O N ~ .- n M Ni w w w » w » n w w 0 0 0 0 0 o v o o e e 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Q ¢ < Q Q Z Z 2 Z Z m m m o 0 m m m H ~ O r r r ~ r C c C C C O O O O = N R N N N rn m a or m n n n n n 0 0 0 0 0 r~~r~ J > J J J w w m a v N h f ~ F v u ~ `~ ~ .~ .~ .~ .~ .C}~ Q QN Q Q 4 v L ~ ~ LL LL LL LL LL Q ¢ ¢ 6 Q Q Z Z Z Z Z Z ~n N N ~O ~O i0 ° o ° o o N N N W ~ ~ W W W N N N N N N N N N (~ N N o v o C C C O ~ J LL LL LL Y Y Y ~ ~ ~ T T T ~ ~ ~ v o a C C C J O o LL LL LL Y Y Y ~ ~ ~ N W N W E a o ~ ~ ~ W c C LL O U O V LL ~ ~~ W LL U U J p LL J W LL C _ l1 ll Z ~ ~ W U Q ~ a N V Q E 2 E N 6 E c~ ~ N w~¢ m i n p i a ~ > /1 U K¢ O v) S1 K K K v ` N N c l a N N C N ` E 1 c n f i a ~ C 0 0 N o m 0 m m rn N < IL Ii li tLL p ~ C _N N N N ~ ~ . ~j > > > F, a Q Q Q 6 Z Z Z z z Z N ~O h N N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o a N N N N N N M M M M M M 0 0 0 0 0 0 v o o v o 0 c c C C c c LL LL IL t1 l1 IL Y Y Y Y Y Y ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ T T T T T T ~ ~ ~ g ~ ~ a 7 C ~ C j J ~ c J LL C 9 ~ ~ V r LL LL w Q Q d ~G rv Z 'cy o ~ a a w o$ m c Oo:aO Via` m `m W N ~ v u c ~ _ A n E m OI Y E J ~ O N ~ O S N J (7 _ p) N ~ N a ~ O m m Yi o m 3 °o K c ID rn W LL M w > N M O 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ N ~ ~ N ~ O¢ '~' d N ' K 01 Z Z Z y o w Q m ~ O D Q S` d U U U N a P-85 tp O r O M h O O tD ~O 0 0 0 M tD (D O P M t0 O N O N M O O O N Ot O M O M N tD ~ 0 0< O O M O N O N O r N th O V - O c0 1~ N O C O O O N O ~O V m M N N M W M [7 (D ~ N M [O ? N O> M O .- O O V ~O N m ^ O N ' f0 h N (OR m r N t0 N Q U JI j _ r w va w w » w ,n v o e o o a o e o 0 0 o e e o 0 2° o 0 0 m o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .- o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 } 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 c o 0 o c o 0 0 0 0 0 0 Z` ~ ~ P? ¢ Q ¢ ¢ ¢ Q ¢ 6 Q Q ¢ ¢ Q ¢ ¢ ¢ Q ¢ ¢ Q ' ~ z Z `z Z Z Z Z Z 2 Z 2 Z Z Z Z Z Z z Z z z Z m m 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O 0 0 0 ~O ~p O O O O O 0 0 0 M M M M M M M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 M M M M ("J 0 0 0 0 0 m `:I 0 0 0 0 0 ~V N N `~ 0 0 N N N ANN 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CC~C~CC O O O O O CCL"~C p m (a(~(~~ a a ^ N ` [~ ~ ~ ^ N N m ~y Z ~ O~. ~N O~ OJ ~N ~ ~ 9 c m m d u o ~ m m LL~ E a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a C a a a a a C C C C C N OI ~_ O m C C C C C J J J J J LL LL LL LL LL C C_ C_ C_ C J p LL LL LL LL LL C_ C_ C C C C J J J J J LL LL LL LL LL LL LL J J J J J LL LL LL LL LL 3 ' ` ` ` w m m m d ~ m = v m m v a m m d m v m m v a d m m ' yJ C y ~. y {. ~ ~ {' ~' ,~' Y Y Y Y ;C tiC Y .~ Y Y Y Y Y N N N N N C p m a m N m m N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .m m N m m ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ m m m m m m m ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ g ~ ~ g ~ ~ ~ V~ °y . T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T m m m m T T T T T m m m m m m 9 m m m m m m m m m m m m m C C C C C C C C C C C C O L A C C C C C C D O O O O C C C C C O O O O O O O O D O O O O O O O O ~ c t ~.~ ~ ~ ~ g. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ g ~ ~ ~ E m ~ ~ o O L D m LL c A LL LL LL 9 N ~ C a C C a C j c W C~ c ~ V V Z Il a J J O p V ly a ~ J O O V LL LL a O N~ J U C o o LL a O m u C ~ O LL C % j LL U' U ~ U % 7 x J a ~p y U U ~ O~ O O F LL O Q a F LL O Q Q !~ LL d d V Q¢ ~~ Q LL m N N O V m N O h 6 m z ~/I E p m Z N 6 6 m 2 .tl) . m t U U CI Q U m p v V U m O~ V U m m C O d U C U m ~ ¢ d~ «~ ~ n d~~ C d N N Oi ~~ c a 1~ d~ ,[ d ' ~ tll N K Q ~ LL to K Q S d N C O Q U~ f/i 6 Q p a C m p m O rn O m O a ~ m Q m LL m LL ~ LL m LL y C N N !~ !~ 3 3 3 3 a N # ~ ry N ~ N m m LL Q Q a m m J ~ m 3 A 0 y m °~' W o > > a L ~j o 0 c m o U E E N K O N O q O c5 M N N N N Z Z Z O Z ~ ~ 0 ^ LL U LL U LL U LL U z w m a P-86 M ~n n o n w o n co m o r n o m o m v o o M ~n m m M o N m b OI N< m~ n O O W N O Ul V O N N N V O O N N n M M H O V O n N O O O1 tp M M O N O ~- ~- Qt m 0 0 0 V M N O h< tO N ( O t0 a0 O M M R n ' O N ~- m p C ~ O O O O O N N ai D7 M M O W n ~ tO N ~ O ~[f M N N N N a7 N O N ~O ~ p O~ O ~ O n N O < N M d O N O O1 O _ M N ~ p ~I r N M N ~ ~ V ~ 1A f9 VI W Mi 1!1 F9 V o a o a e o e o o h o a` 0 0 0 0 o e o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - O N O O O O •- 0 0 O ~- O O 0 O O O I y 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y 0 0 o c o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 L` , 3 ?: ¢ a a a g a a a a¢ g g a¢ g< g g g ? Q¢ a a ° z z Z z z z z z' z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z ~ v N o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ o m 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~o o m co io O O O O O n n n n n n n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 R t ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N N N N N N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N N ~V N N O O O O O N N N N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N N N N= N ~1 O ~ `y ~~~ W ~~ •- M m~ 0 CO ~~ M M l`l (7 M N N N N N N N J d m rn rn m m rn m m rn m m rn ro w n n n n i~ .- C d W a N u o C d N O u, E 'o v o a o o a a v a o g v a a a a -o -o c c v o v a o v v c c C C c c c N R C C C C C c c C J J J c C C c c c J J J J J O c C C J O O J O J J O J J O J OI ~ O d O O J J J LL LL LL LL W LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL W IL LL LL LL LL LL LL IL LL LL LL 0 3 m v a v i v m d m w m m 'm v m w~ w v m w m m w d 'v d E N C Y .'E Y Y Y ~ LY Y Y .L1' ~' Y Y iC Y Y~ Y Y ~' {' Y Y .~C Y Y N R C J R R R N R R R R R R R R R R N N R R R R R R R R R " d ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ g ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ g J ~ a U d T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T d d d d d T T T >. T T T d d d d d d d o N 'o d d d d d d d d c c c c c c c d d d d d d c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c t i c 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o a o 0 0 ~ c ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ F ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ L v O a > > m O t d ~ o LL LL t ~` N d E C a t~$ IL a c ° 'O u 'O C ° c V a ~ c U U V :, 2 ~ d c~ O oO > a G U W j ?~ ~ c o O O O V ~ ~ Q JQ LL c ~ J~ o a LL C 1 O d C LL 1 p LL U 6 j O 'p O U C LL ` LL y j d U U 9 O Q U x O C U U U U 1 p U x U U' LL O x . LL a R VV UU ~ N 0. a x 6 W ~ d n W a N ~ d LL a N d~ a F- ¢ t0 O R V d 6 T R m E '^ w n m Z o m 2 v y a Z w ~` w i n E a 2~ u c a ' c d 'c ' - U d d U d~ C U U d E U d d c d U v d N> d d E C~ 1 t S d d d N> E d c d N 'o y c N Q' d d d ~ R d a J N n d d rn a v ~n~oasa a`~ n d d v hsaa-a` n v v~~aa` u rn ~aav~sa3 ~ a c d o m o rn rn A a ~y ~ IL lL y N N N N R > > ~ 3 >> 9 N # N py d ~ N ~ N W N N ~ N R a U ~ d C ~ ~ N d d W U' N V O O L y C E m E K p o 0 0 ry N N N Z Z Z Z ~ 0 ~ ~ LL LL LL LL U U U V M m a P-87 o~ ~~a~o ~ M M ~ ~- c7 O N O N O !~ < <O tp I~ r (O T W Cl i~ M N n OJ M ti ~ O m O m m m m N m N O ~ t0 b U ] w vi w V 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 y I o O o 0 0 0 0 0 } 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ Q Q_ Q Q Q Q Q Q R~ O Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z N O O O O O O O O N d 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 . +l h N h h N ~ 0 VJ t[1 ~ J N` N`\ N N N a .- ~ .- .- : ~ .- c m m Q u o ~ N >` u H E -° a s -° a -° v o C C C C C C C C ~ O u O d J J J J J J J J LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL E s c = ~ .°1Ze .Y s x~ s s ~ c~ ~ ~ u m w `m `m m m `wm ~ ~ ~ ~ g g ~ g p p U D y T T T T T T T T °~~ m m a° w m w d L ) C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C C L m c ~ c ~ O a O L ~ v i a E t U A ~ U q = mm 9 C C U C~ LL J a J J c J LL N N U Q f' N~ Q N Q ry -- >, ,,. O ° m u ` E m u a~ c J n v~ rn o °' ~ '~ ~/1 N K Q Q U- d ~i 0 ~ v m y m a ~ i ° m c ~ w ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Q F a J < U N LL 2 H 3 ° ~ o z ~ w v ~ J c N o ` N c o W Z m ° E _ m Q o o 2 tD 2 O N o Q N U O z J ~ ~ LL Q U H ui 0 2 w N a STAFF REPORT COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT Date: July 21, 2010 To: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager From: Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director By: Paula Pachon, Management Analyst III Subject: APPROVAL OF THE COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE REPORT RECOMMENDATION In accordance with the City Council's request to become more informed projects and events, this report is provided to highlight pertinen occurring in the Community Services Department. This report is informational purposes only. Seniors: t issues, projects and programs provided to the City Council for of recreation programs, • The following table highlights some senior activities that took place during June 2010 as well as the total number of registrations for the year for Wellness Pass and Senior Transportation Activity Date Number of Partici ants Pool Tournament June 4, 2010 16 Senior Dance June 12, 2010 125 Ice Cream Social /First Da of Summer June 21, 2010 80 Senior Birthda s June 30, 2010 200 Inde endence Da Celebration Jul 1, 2010 180 Wellness Pass - A es 60+ Total Re istered Jan -June 2010 - 854 Wellness Pass - A es 50-59 Total Re istered Jan -June 2010 - 384 Silver Fox Ex ress Total Re istered Jan -June 2010 - 79 • Uocomino Senior Activities are summarized below: Activi Date Time Pool Tournament Jul 9, 2010 1:00 .m. Senior Birthda June 30, 2010 11:00 a.m. • It is anticipated that the Senior Advisory Committee will hold a special meeting on Monday, September 27, 2010 at 9:00 a.m. at the James L. Brulte Senior Center, • Participation in the Senior Nutrition Prooram for the month of June 2010 is summarized in the table on the following page: P-89 APPROVAL OF THE COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE REPORT PAGE 2 JULY 21, 2010 Week Date Participants 1 6/1 throw h 6/4/2010 816 2 6/6 throw h 6/11/2010 1,010 3 6/14 throw h 6!18!2010 1,010 4 6/21 throw h 6/25/2010 1,020 5 6/28 throw h 6!30(2010 607 Total meals served for the month of June, 2010: 4,463 Senior Services: • The table below summarizes participation in Senior Services activities for the month of June 2010: Pro ram Number of Partici ants Blood Pressure Screenin 89 Resource Libra 334 Bereavement Su ort 8 Elder Law Private Counselin 15 HICAP 3 Dr. Cohen - "The Doctor is In° 12 Peo le with Arthritis Can Exercise PACE 300 Sit and Be Fit 370 Special Needs Programs: The table below highlights Special Needs activities that took place during June 2010: Activity Class Start Date Number of Partici ants Martial Arts - Be innin March 31, 2010 2 Martial Arts -Intermediate March 31, 2010 1 Ballet - S eciai Needs Aril 1, 2010 1 Ballet - S eciai Needs Aril 1, 2010 1 Ta - S eciai Needs Aril 1, 2010 6 Mixed Martial Arts June 5, 2010 1 Jazz and Hi Ho - S eciai Needs June 7, 2010 8 S eciai Needs Adult Da Cam June 7, 2010 20 Ta - S eciai Needs June 10, 2010 5 Movement and Tumblin - S eciai Needs June 10, 2010 4 IncredABLE Draw and Paint Com uter June 19, 2010 4 Upcoming Special Needs activities are summarized below: Activit Class Start Date Time Martial Arts - Be innin Jul 7, 2010 5:00 .m. Martial Arts -Intermediate Jul 7, 2010 6:30 .m. Mixed Martial Arts Jul 10, 2010 11:45 a.m. Star Performers Jul 14, 2010 5:30 .m. IncredABLE Athletes - Basketball a es 15 and u Jul 15, 2010 7:00 .m. IncredABLE Athletes - Basketball a es 10 - 14 Jul 15, 2010 6:00 .m. P-90 APPROVAL OF THE COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE REPORT PncE 3 JULY 21, 2010 Activi Class Start Date Time IncredABLE Athletes - Basketball a es 5 - 9 Jul 15, 2010 5:00 .m. Frida Ni ht Fun Club - "Ice Cream Social" Jul 16, 2010 5:30 .m. IncredABLE Athletes - Soccer a es 15 and u Jul 19, 2010 7:00 .m. IncredABLE Athletes - Soccer a es 10 -14 Jul 19, 2010 6:00 .m. IncredABLE Athletes - Soccer a es 5 - 9 Jul 19, 2010 5:00 .m. Tech Junction: • The table below summarizes participation in Tech Junction activities for the month of June 2010: Senior Computer Classes Date Number of Partici ants Intro to Surfin the Intemet June 7, 2010 15 Mana in Multimedia June 8, 2010 13 Intro to Microsoft Word June 23, 2010 8 Public Computer Classes Date Number of Partici ants Intro to T in Level I June 23, 2010 19 Intro to Com uters June 23, 2010 5 Intro to Word June 23, 2010 4 Tech Junction 'Time Frame Number of Partici ants Dro -In Use June 496 Senior Classes June 181 Public Classes June 67 Total Uses/Users June 744 Upcomino Computer Class activities are summarized below Senior Com uter Classes Date E-mail and E-cards Jul 5, 2010 Intro to PowerPoint Jul 6, 2010 Intro to Surfin the Internet Jul 9, 2010 Excel Worksho Jul 19, 2010 Public Com uter Classes Start Date Joume sin Com utin - Euro a Jul 8, 2010 Intro T in ,Wont and PowerPoint Jul 9, 2010 E-Ba Jul 10, 2010 Intro to Microsoft Excel Jul 28, 2010 Intro to PowerPoint Jul 28, 2010 Intro to T in Level II Jul 28, 2010 Trips and Tours: Tri Date Number of Partici ants An el vs. Dod ers - Freewa Series June 13, 2010 37 Pacific Marine Mammal Center June 17, 2010 37 Summer Can on Tour Adventure June 21, 2010 1 Holl ood Bowl - 4th of Jul S ectacular Jul 4, 2010 45 P-91 APPROVAL OF THE COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE REPORT PncE 4 JULY 21, 2010 • Upcoming Trips and Tours are summarized below: Tri Date Rubber Duck Tour Jul 14, 2010 Pa eant of the Masters Jul 28, 2010 Human Services -Commodities Date Number of Families Served Number of Individuals Served. Monda ,June 7, 2010 432 710 Facilities: The table below illustrates the number of rentals/bookings and attendance figures for our community facilities during the month of June 2010. Facility Rentals # Rentals/ Bookin s Rerrtal Attendance Building Attendance James L. Brulte Senior Center 79 / 164 4,490 22,184 Gold S. Lewis Communit Center 98 (171 6,980 13,900 Youth: • The table below summaries Youth Prooram Attendance for the month of June. Program Classes/Sites Registrants I Attendance Pla cam 28 / 2 409 / 2,168 Cam Cucamon a 5 / 1 371 / 1,395 Kid Ex lovers 6 / 1 184 / 368 Lewis Partnership Kids Club @ Del Mar, & Terra Vista Apartments 2 567 - Camp Cucamonga and Playcamp started June 1St. - Kid Explorers began June 71h. Teens: • The table below summarizes Teen Program Attendance for the month of June. Pro ram/Activit Attendance/Partici ation Teen Center 915 artici ants Girls Ni ht Out -Twill ht Event 26 artici ants TRAC -Bab sittin 41 artici ants, 15 volunteers TRAC Awards Ceremon 29 artici ants, 42 s ectators Teen Tri s to Santa Monica & Venice Beach 55 artici ants TRAC ALHS snack bar, Camp Cucamonga, Kids Ex lovers, S ortscam ,and Pla cam 46 volunteers Skate Park 2,466 artici ants, 718 s ectators P-92 APPROVAL OF THE COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE REPORT PAGE 5 JULY 21, 2010 Recreation Contract Classes -Summer 2010: Number of Classes Number of Ciass Sites Number of Re istrants 354 13 1,940 Facilities: The table below illustrates the number of rentals/bookings and attendance figures for our community facilities during the month of June. Facility Rentals # Rentals/Bookings Rental Attendance Building Attendance Lions Center East 23 / 65 248 2,152 Lions Center West 30 / 180 458 3,885 Human Services: RC Family Resource Center: • The table below summarizes Center Programs/Workshops Attendance for the month of June. Pro ram/Worksho Attendance /Partici ation A enc Collaboration Meetin 25 AI-Anon/AI-a-Teen 150 Alcohol Anon mous 83 Children Crisis Res onse Team 9 Communit Closet Giveawa 229 De artment of Children Services 56 De ressive Bi olar Su rt 27 ETC Youth Event 19 Famil Fun Ni ht 52 I.E. Famil Resource Center Coalition 23 Hi Ho Class 61 House of Ruth Domestic Violence Ciass 46 Leadin Ladies -Rainbow Readin Club 21 Le al Aid Societ -Free referrals 52 Math Tutorin 66 Parentin Classes Para Los Ninos 38 Pomona Valle Learnin Disabilities Assoc. 33 RC Famil Resource Center Staff Meetin 4 VNA & Hos ice Trainin 23 Women on the Move 72 Resource Fair 350 TOTAL 1,480 • The table on the following page summarizes the Clients Served by Each Agency Housed at the RCFRC for the month of June. P-93 APPROVAL OF THE COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE REPORT PAGE 6 Juw 21, 2010 A encies Housed at the Resource Center Number of Clients Served Touch Ministries 330 Beau for Ashes 42 House of Ruth 45 Ea le's Wins 13 Li ht House Leamin Center 70 Leadin Ladies 42 Para Los Ninos 39 TOTAL 581 Facilities: • The table below illustrates the number of rentals and attendance figures for our community facilities during the month of June. Facility Rentals # Rentals Rental Attendance Building Attendance RC Famil Resource Center 1 40 2,101 Volunteers: The table below summarizes the Community Services Department's volunteer usage for the month of May 2010. Division May 2009 # of # of Vols. Hours $ Value* May 2010 # of # of Vols. Hours $ Value* Administration ~ 5 15 $330 5 15 $330 Senior Services 151 1,888 $41,479 152 2,176 $47,807 Human Services 71 338 $7,426 71 311 $6,833 S orts 93 728 $15,994 114 678 $14,896 S eclat Events 67 204 $4,482 52 324 $7,118 Performin Arts 76 715 $15,709 65 702 $15,423 Teens 11 102 $2,241 7 37 $813 Youth Pro rams 40 252 $5,536 25 145 $3,186 Totals 514 4,242 $93,197 491 4,388 $96,404 'Cases on .2ZLtl//noun - a[a[e ave/aya as un,annnma ma ,.ouw..a ,~~~=yv.~~o.,, .,~,....,. Youth Sports: The table below summarizes Youth Sports Activities for the June reporting period. Activi # Participants A e/Gender # Teams Northtown Teen Volunteer Club NTVC Meetin 6 6 - 12 grade N/A Northtown Youth Soccer 38 6-14 boys & iris 4 Northtown Pee Wee Soccer 11 3-5 bo s & irls 2 Northtown Hi -Ho Dance 13 5-14 bo s & irls N/A Northtown Build A Beat Drums - NEW 3 5-10 boys 8 girls N/A P-94 APPROVAL OF THE COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE REPORT PAGE 7 JULY 21, 2010 Activit' #Partici ants A ' e/Gender # Teams Northtown Build A Beat Drums - NEW 10 11-16 boys & girls N/A Northtown Summer Cam 19 6-14 bo s & iris N/A Northtown CASA Cookin Class 7 Adults N/A Pee Wee Summer Baseball 602 3-5 boys & iris 64 Sports Clinic -Basketball Session 1 38 6-14 boys & girls N/A S orts Clinic -Soccer 31 6-14 bo s & iris N/A S orts Clinic - Volle ball 28 8-14 bo s & iris N/A CMS Judo 45 7-12 girls & boys NA RC Family Sports Center: • The table below provides drop-in/open plav and rental participation at the Center for the reporting period. Adult Sports: Activit #Partici ants Adult Basketball 776 Youth Basketball 988 Adult Ra uetball 325 Youth Racquetball 47 Adult Volle ball 1 Youth Volle ball 37 Adult Walleyball 1 Youth Walle ball 59 Jazzercise 1236 Rentals 330 Youth Judo 72 Team Volle bait Practice 440 Team Basketball Practice 30 Futsal Soccer 10 The table below summarizes adult sport activities for the reporting period. Activit #Partici ants # Team Gender Softball 2282 163 Males & Females Adult Basketball 326 34 Males Rac uetball 10 N/A Males & Females Soccer 276 23 Males & Females Dro in Soccer - Monda s 121 N/A Males & Females Tennis 12 N/A Males & Females There were four Adult Softball Tournaments during the month of May at the Epicenter. P-95 APPROVAL OF THE COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE REPORT PAGE 8 JULY 21, 2010 Aquatics: The table below summarizes Aquatics for the reporting period. Activi # Participants Age & Gender Aquatics - "Learn to Swim" Pro ram 1,947 Ages 6 months- Adult; Males & Females Cultural and Performing Arts: The table below summarizes Theatre Arts Academy classes during the reporting period. Activity Participants/Attendance Broadwa Babies 25 Singing for a Lifetime 39 Teen Actors Bootcam 47 Youth Theater Workshop 48 Showsto ers 60 Intro to Video Production 8 RC Divine Choir 10 TOTAL 237 . Community Theatre rehearsals/auditions included the following during the reporting period. Activit Partici ants/Attendance Peter Pan 433 Rental Activities: • The table below summarizes rental activities in Celebration Hall and Imagination Courtyard at the Cultural Center for the reporting period. Celebration Hall Rental Events Date Event Attendance Wednesday 6/2/10 7-11 Meeting 80 Thursday 6/3110 Lifestream Blood Drive 300 Tuesday 6/8/10 Registrar of Voters 100 Friday 6/11110 Claremont High School Theater Boosters 250 Friday 6/18/10 SC City Clerk Association Meeting 100 Thursday 6/24110 Film Screening 80 Saturday 6126/10 Seminar and Workshop 400 TOTAL • ., 1310= _ Libra and Other Ci Government De artment's Celebration Hall Events Date Event Attendance Frida 6/4/10 Local Histo Ni ht Libra 200 Wednesday 6/9/10 Wild Wednesday (Library) 40 P-96 APPROVAL OF THE COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE REPORT PAGE 9 Juw 21, 2010 Libra and Other Ci Government De artment's Celebration Hall Events Date Event Attendance Thursday 6/10/10 Summer Reading Club Libra 400 Wednesda 6/16/10 Wild Wednesda Libra 40 Thursda 6/17/10 Teen Event Libra 40 Thursda 6/17/10 Summer Readin Club 400 Wednesda 6/23/10 Wild Wednesda Libra 40 Thursda 6/24/10 Summer Readin Club 400 Wednesda 6/30/10 Wild Wednesda Libra 40 TOTAL 1600 Meet & Greet Events Date Event Attendance Saturda 6/5110 Air Su I 25 Volunteer Events Date Event Attendance Wednesda 6/2/10 Volunteer Game Ni ht 45 Lewis Family Playhouse: • During the reporting period, the Lewis Family Playhouse was host to a wide variety of productions, community programs and private rentals. The table below summarizes this information for the reporting period. The table below reflects number of tickets sold for various performances during the reporting period. It does not reflect actual patrons in attendance. Lewis Famil ,Pia ,house Professional/ Presented Productions SHOW DATE Tickets Sold NUMBER OF EVENTS 6/5/10 Air Su 1 556 1 •tewis:Famif ,;Pla house`Rental Events.- ':' ' SHOW DATE Tickets Sold NUMBER OF EVENTS Boll ood Dance 6/6/10 292 1 Goodwill of Southern California Also utilized Celebration Hall 6/8/10 250 1 Art Institute 6/8/10 525 1 Valverde SPA 6/18-6/20/10 1662 4 Dance D namics 6/26-6/27/10 1549 4 Public Lobby: • The Lobby to the Victoria Gardens Cultural Center is open to the public six days a week. During the reporting period, local residents visited the public areas. Public Lobby Total: 1,146 P-97 APPROVAL OF THE COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE REPORT Juw 21, 2010 PAGE 10 Parks: • The table on the following page provides usage information for park picnic shelters and special use facilities for the month of June 2010: Park/Shelter Attendance Number of Rentals Coyote Canyon 285 6 Day Creek 53 16 Heritage 1,79 29 Hermosa 36 13 Milliken 68 20 Red Hill 6,90 5 mphitheatre 1035 ictoria Arbors 335 10 OTAL 10,904 14 Equestrian Center 11 "Equestrian participants include drop-in use. • Park monitors continue to keep daily reports of activities in our parks, often helping out residents in need of assistance. Equestrian Center: Staff continues to meet quarterly with users of the Equestrian Center (Alta Loma Riding Ctub, Rancho Rebels 4-h, Rising Stars of Equestrian Therapy and Rancho Cucamonga Citizen Mounted Patrol) to address maintenance needs and programming. Special Events: The table below summarizes month of June at the Victoria were free to the public. the Movies in Town Square program that took place during the Gardens Chaffey Town Square. All movies started at dusk and Date Movie. Title Attendance June 1s` Cloud with a Chance of Meatballs 400 June 8 Wizard of Oz 450 June 15 Astro Bo 450 • Upcoming special events include the Department's Movies in the Park program (all movies start at dusk) and the Concerts in the Park program (all concerts start at 7:00 p.m.) and are summarized in the table on the following page. P-98 APPROVAL OF THE COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE REPORT JULY 21, 2010 PAGE 11 . Date Event Location MOVIES IN THE PARK July 5, 6 & 9 Monsters VS Aliens (PG) 5 -Central Park; 6 -Victoria Gardens (Chaffey Town Square); 9'" - Red Hill Park (am hitheatre July 12, 13 & 16 Imagine That (PG) 12' -Central Park; 13 -Victoria Gardens (cnaffey Town square); 16'" - Red Hill Park amphitheatre) July 19, 20 & 23 Shorts (PG) 19 -Central Park; 20 -Victoria Gardens (Chaffey Town Square); 23`d - Red Hill Patk am hitheatre July 26, 27 & 30 Galaxy Quest (PG) 26 -Central Park; 27 -Victoria Gardens (Chaffey Town Square); 30'" - Red Hill Park amphitheatre) August 2, 3 & 6 Planet 51 (PG) 2" -Central Park; 3` - Vctoria Gardens (Charfey Town Square); 6~' - Red Hill Park amphitheatre CONCERTS IN THE PA RK Jul 8 Stone Soul 60's Motown Red Hill Park Am hitheatre Jul 15 The Answer Classic Rock Red Hill Park Am hitheatre Jul 22 U stream Re ae Red Hill Park Am hitheatre Jul 29 The Groove Oldies Red Hill Park Am hitheatre Au ust 5 80z All Stars 80's Red Hill Park Am hitheatre Park and Recreation Commission: • The Commission's June 17`h meeting was cancelled due to a known lack of a quorum. The next meeting of the Commission will be on June 22nd. At this meeting the following items are scheduled to be discussed/acted upon. - Presentation on the Community Services Department's team programming. - Review of City Council updates. - Approval of minutes from the Commission's May 20, 2010 meeting. - Update and establishment of future agenda items for the Senior Advisory Committee. - Update and establishment of future agenda items for the Sports Advisory Committee. - Semi-annual update on Community Services Department's marketing efforts. - Consideration of appointments of Park and Recreation Commissioner to various sub- committees. - Commission discussed regarding the benefits of parks in the community. - Committee updates from: Trails Advisory Committee, Sports Advisory Committee, Senior Advisory Committee and Armed/Veteran's Reflection Area Committee. Rancho Cucamonga Community Foundation: • The annual meetino for the Rancho Cucamonga Community Foundation took place on Wednesday, June 9, 2010. The fallowing items were discussed/acted upon at this meeting: - Board Development Training for Successful Fundraising. - Administration of Oath of Office of new Board Member. - Election of Officers (Chair, Vice-Chair and Secretary/Treasurer). - Committee Update Reports (Golf, Spring Event, Executive/Finance, Board Development, Performing Arts Giving and Special Campaign Committees). P-99 APPROVAL OF THE COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE REPORT PAGE 12 JULY 21, 2010 - Update on the Playhouse Party Train (Spring Event) and approval of an event budget. - Consideration of a request from Associated Artists of the Inland Empire. - Discussion of a recommendation from the Executive/Finance Committee pertaining to a date/time for an annual recognition of donors and approval of an event budget. - Request for approval of a staffing recommendation for the Rancho Cucamonga Community Foundation. - Discussion of a recommendation from the Executive/Finance Committee concerning a Board Retreat and approval of an event budget. - Requests for approval of Fiscal Year 2010-2011 budgets. - Request for approval of a recommendation from the Executive/Finance Committee regarding name change of the Community Foundation. - Review of the Community Foundation meeting schedule for fiscal year 2010-2011. The Foundation will be hosting a donor recoonition reception on Wednesday, July 14"' at the Bank of America Imagination Courtyard. The event will include hors d'oeuvres and entertainment by INCA a Peruvian ensemble of musicians and dancers highlighting the rich multi-cultural heritage of ethnic folkloric music, songs, dances and traditions from all over Peru. INCA is a part of the Foundation's 3-week sponsored outdoor summer World Music Series at the Cultural Center. • The table below summarizes the Foundation sponsored free World Music Concerts that will be taking place at the Cultural Center. Date /Time Grou July 7 / 5:30 p.m. Kusun Ensemble (Music from Ghana, West Africa Jul 14 / 5:30 .m. INCA Ensemble Traditional music from Peru Jul 21s / 5:30 .m. Los Pin uos Latin sounds from A entina The table below list upcoming Foundation fundraising committee meetings for the summer months. Committee Meetin Dates Golf Jul 12 and Au ust 2" S rin Event Jul 20 and Au ust 17 S ecial Cam ai n Au ust 26 • The table below list upcoming business meetings of the Foundation. Committee /Board Meetin Meetin Date Executive/Finance Se tember 8 Board Develo ment Se tember 16 Full Board Meetin October 13 Resp tfully 1 ed, Kevin Ardle Community Services Director 1:1 COMMSERNCowtcil&BoardslCifyCou~cillStafrReporfs12010ICSDUpdafe.7.21.10. doc STAFF REPORT COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT Date: July 21, 2010 To: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager From: Kevin McArcile. Community Services Director By: Paula Pachon, Management Analyst III Subject: CONSIDERATION OF AMENDMENT NO. 7 TO THE AMENDED AND RESTATED LEASE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND RANCHO BASEBALL, LLC, RELATING TO STADIUM SECURITY REIMBURSEMENT RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council approve the attached Amendment No. 7 to the Amended and Restated Lease Agreement between the City and Rancho Baseball, LLC (Quakes) relating to stadium security reimbursement. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The current lease agreement between the City and the Quakes specifies the schedule for security guard services at the Epicenter at times when there is not a Quakes game being held in the stadium (Exhibit #1). The agreement requires the Quakes to pay for these security guard services in accordance with an identified cost schedule. At the request of the Quakes, the City has reviewed the current stadium security guard reimbursement schedule and rates to determine whether any cost saving measures could be identified for the Quakes, while still protecting the security of the stadium. Based upon the Quakes request, City staff has evaluated the current schedule and identified opportunities for cost savings. These savings would come from a modified security guard schedule, and also as a result from reduced costs the City received from recent contract negotiations with the security guard company. Included in the proposed amendment are plans for a mutually agreeable compromise in relation to stadium security reimbursement which would reduce the security guard schedule and rates starting July 1, 2010. The attached proposed amendment does indicate that this change is being requested by the Quakes and that in the event of vandalism, theft or other damages which may occur at the Stadium during hours in which no security guards are scheduled, the Quakes would be responsible for paying for the cost to repair/replace the vandalism, theft or damage. The proposed amendment is attached as Exhibit #2. The proposed amendment for after hours security guard services does not include any changes to the requirements for police officers required inside the stadium for actual Quakes games. These requirements remain unchanged. P-101 OONSIDERATION OF AMENDMENT N0.7 TO THE AMENDED AND RESTATED LEASE PAGE 2 AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE QTY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND RANQ IO BASEBALL, LL.C, RELATING TO STADIUM SECURITY REIMBURSEMENT Ttn.Y 21, 2010 Based upon these provisions, it is staff"s recommendation that the City Council approve the attached Amendment No. 7 to the Amended and Restated Lease between the City and Rancho Baseball, LLC. Res Kevin MkArdle Community Services Director I:ICOMMSERVICouncil&90af'dslCftyCouncillStaHReportsl4mendmenfQuakesLease.No.7. StadiumSecunty.doc S E:~hibit 111 . a ~ P-102 AMENDMENT N0.2 TO AMENDED AND RESTATED LEASE BETWEEN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ("CTI'Y" HEREINAFTER) AND VALLEY BASEBALL CLUB; INC. ("TENANT" HEREINAFTER) A. Recitals. (i) During August, 1999, City and Tenant entered into the above-referenbed Amended and Restated Lease ("the Lease" hereinafter} which has been amended once before. (ii) Pazagraph 25 of the Lease requires that City provide security for the Stadium during certain time periods and City now does so by contracting with a private company which provides such services to the Stadium and adjoining playing fields, pazking lots, maintenance building, and animal shelter. - (iii) Tenant currently reimburses City for a portion of City's costs incurred in supplying the security services referred to in Recital (ii) above. (iv) The parties desire to again modify a payment schedule related to security. B. Amendment No. 2. NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto agree as follows: 1. Paragraph 25 of the Lease hereby is amended to read as follows: "25. Secnrity. "City shall provide security for the Stadium during the following time periods: "A., From the completion of any event conducted at the Stadium until dawn of the following day; "B. From dusk of a weekday upon which no event is conducted at the Stadium until dawn of the following day; and . "C. For all twenty-four (24) hours of each Saturday, Sunday and Holiday during which no event is conducted at the Stadium. "The parties understand that City may contract w2th an independent security service. to dischazge its above-stated obligations. City and Tenant shall confer in establishing a security management plan to implement City's obligation to provide security stated herein. In addition, City shall provide a vehicle and radio transmission capacity on an as-needed basis in providing for the above- 11231\W011676368 1 P-103 described security. In aid of providing security for the Stadium, Tenant shall pay to City the following total sums in ten (10) equal installments, payable on.or before the first day of each successive month commencing in January in each of the following years: 1999 - $60,000 2000 - $62,500 2001 - $65,000 2002 - $67,500 - 2003 - $70,000 2004 - $72,500 2005 - $75,000 2006 - $77,500 2007 - $80,000 2008 - $82,500 2009 - $85,000 2010 - $87,500 2011 - $90,000 2012 - $92,500 "Tenant shall be responsible for providing all necessary security for the Stadium and each and every Class A baseball game held at the Stadium. Tenant agrees to use such security officers in type and amount described in Exhibit "E" hereto. It is anticipated that three (3) police officers shall be required for forty- seven (47) weekday games, four (4) police officers for twenty-three (23) weekend games and seven (7) police officers for the July 4 or other sellout games. During each yeaz of the term hereof, Tenant shall pay for security costs calculated in accordance with Exhibit "E" hereto in five (5) equal installments at the same time as minimum annual rent shall be paid. Notwithstanding any other term or provision contained iri this Section 25, security shall be provided in accordance with the above-referenced criteria, and should attendance compel the employment of officers.in addition to those referred to above, Tenaat shall reimburse City for 117311WOI~L76368 2 P-104 the cost of providing such additional officers within thirty (30) days of City providing to Tenant a statement reflecting such additional costs." Exhibit "E" attached to this Amendment No. 2 shall replace and supersede Exhibit "E" attached to. the Lease.. 3. Other than as expressly amended hereby, the Lease and each and every term and provision thereof shall remain in full force and effect. IN WITNESS THEREOF, the parties hereto have entered into this Amendment No. 2 as of the dates stated below as to each such party. Dated: (`~7-4Z. Dated: ~-~ 7 ~z VALLEY BASEBALL CLUB, INC. Dated: ~ 0 ~ ~~ v ' President ~. 11231~DOOIW7fi366 ~ P-105 EXHIBIT "E" Parameters of Security Ser~~ces Only San Bernardino County Deputy Sheriffs or San Bernardino County Deputy Sheriffs Reserve personnel shall be used at each and every home game played at the Epicenter by the Tenant. The Tenant shall pay for any and all necessary security personnel for each game based on the following ratio of attendance to officers: Attendance 1 - 2;000 2,001 - 4,000 Number of Sheriff's Officers 3 3 plus 1 supervisor 4,001 -Maximum seating capacity. 6 plus 1 supervisor 11131~0001W76371 Exhibit lit AMENDMENT NO. 7 TO AMENDED AND RESTATED LEASE BETWEEN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ("CITY" HEREINAFTER) AND RANCHO BASEBALL, LLC ("TENANT" HEREINAFTER). A. Recitals. (i) During August, 1999, City and Tenant's predecessor in interest entered into the above-referenced Amendment and Restated Lease which has been amended six times. Said Lease as so amended six times hereinafter is referred to as "the Lease." (ii) The parties wish to again amend the Lease in reference to Section 25 dealing with security. B. Amendment No. 7. NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto agree as follows: Section 25 of the Lease hereby is amended to read as follows: " 25. Securi Commencing July 1, 2010, City shall provide security for the Stadium during the following time periods: A. On every weekday from 8:00 p.m. to 3:00 a.m. of the following day; B. On every Saturday and Sunday night from 7:00 p.m. to 3:00 a.m. of the following day; and C. On every Saturday afternoon from noon unti16:00 p.m. Tenant shall be responsible for any damages to the Stadium occumng during times previously included for security services but not included due to the reduction in coverage reflected in Amendment No. 7 to the Lease as requested by Tenant. The parties understand that City may contract with an independent security service to discharge its above-stated obligations. City and Tenant shall confer in establishing a security management plan to implement City's obligation to provide security stated herein. In addition, City shall provide a vehicle and radio transmission capacity on an as-needed basis in providing for the above- described security. In aid of providing security for the Stadium, Tenant shall pay to City the following total sums in ten (10) equal installments, payable on or before the first day of each successive month commencing in July in each of the following years: P-106 11231-0001\1245I59vl.doc P-107 July 1, 2010 -June 30, 2011 - $31,650 July 1, 201 I -June 30, 2012 - $34,150 Further, the parties hereby ratify the reduction of the payment by Tenant to a total of $66,000 for the period commencing with Tenant's purchase of the Quakes during August 2009 through June 30, 2010. Tenant shall be responsible for providing all necessary security for the Stadium and each and every Class A baseball game held at the Stadium. Tenant agrees to use such security officers in type and amount described in Exhibit "E" hereto. It is anticipated that three (3) police officers shall be required for forty- seven (47) weekday games, four (4) police officers for twenty-three (23) weekend games and seven (7) police officers for the July 4 or other sellout games. During each year of the term hereof, Tenant shall pay for security costs calculated in accordance with Exhibit "E" hereto in five (5) equal installments at the same time as minimum annual rent shall be paid. Notwithstanding any other term or provision wntained in this Section 25, security shall be provided in accordance with the above-referenced criteria, and should attendance compel the employment of officers in addition to those referenced to above, Tenant shall reimburse City for the cost of providing such additional officers within thirty (30) days of City providing to Tenant a statement reflecting such additional costs." 2. Other than as expressly amended hereby, the Lease and each and every term and provision thereof shall remain in full force and effect. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have entered into this Amendment No. 6 as of the date stated below as to each such party. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Dated: Dated: By: Attest: Mayor City Clerk RANCHO BASEBALL, LLC Dated: By: Dated: BY: 2 11231-0001\12457 59v1.doc STAFF REPORT ENGINEERING SERVICES DEP.~1R'I'MENT Date: July 21, 2010 To: Mayor and Members of City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager From: Mark Steuer, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer By: Dan James, Senior Civil Engineer P-108 t_ RANCHO C',,UCAMONGA Subject: APPROVAL TO AUTHORIZE THE MAYOR TO SIGN CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE NO. 680 FOR ADJUSTMENT OF CITY/DEVELOPER PROPERTY LINE AT NO COST TO THE CITY, LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LONG MEADOW DRIVE AND VICTORIA PARK LANE SUBMITTED BY CUCAMONGA 220, L.P., A LIMITED PARTNERSHIP RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Council authorize by minute action the Mayor, Donald J. Kurth, M.D., to sign on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Certificate of Compliance No. 680 for the Lot Line Adjustment between parcel numbers 0227-171-29, 0227-171-47 and 0227-102-03 at no cost to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Tentative Tract 18449, located at the northwest corner of Victoria Park Lane and Long Meadow Drive, is proposing a subdivision consisting of 31 lots. The owner, Cucamonga 220, L.P., is relocating the south portion of the City of Rancho Cucamonga's wetlands property line, at no cost to the City, to be consistent with the existing fence line and proposed Tentative Tract 18449. Respectfully submitted, ,-^°~ Mark A. Steuer Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer MAS:DJ/alrw Attachments P-109 City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Division Vicinifiy Map r J ~ ~j„ ~ ~ T. v 'PRO`JECT'S1TE~' ,_i. ~~ :. < <__ i ;,.. ~....~ ~. ` I ' 7 lI ~ `~~~ `., ~' l / -_ ~ Cam: _ ~ , I ~ ---- - `, i ~-` r `, `,'S .I, -., I- r---~ a, _ _~ Vi ~ m{ ~ m_...._i ~ , ~ ----- . _ _ -- .. - ~ -- ------- - --- ------ -J ' z-- ~ a 1 ~---' ~ i -.-_~ ~ 0 . N W ~ E S Item: Title: ._Y~ .--___.~ ~ ~, . 1 ' f~ ~ I ~w I N ;, 7 ~ ~'~ ~ i.J-.. 1 .iL 10 STAFF REPORT PUBLIC WORKS S1/RVICES DrPARTMFNT Date: July 21, 2010 To: Mayor and Members of the City Couricil President and Members of the Board of Directors Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager RANCI-30 CUCAMONGA From: William Wittkopf, Public Works Services Director Mike Bell, Fire Chief By: Ty Quaintance, Facilities Superintendent , Julie Ungashick, Management Analyst II Janet Walker, Management Analyst II Subject: APPROVE AND AUTHORIZE EMCOR SERVICE/MESA ENERGY SYSTEMS, INC. (EMCOR SERVICE) TO CONTINUE AS THE SINGLE SOURCE SERVICE PROVIDER AND INSTALLER FOR HVAClCONTROL WORK AND RELATED ENERGY MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS FOR CITY AND FIRE DISTRICT FACILITIES AT THE SAME RATES AS FISCAL YEAR 2009-2010 IN THE AMOUNT OF $215,767 FOR CITY FACILITIES AND $22,640 FOR FIRE DISTRICT FACILITIES FOR ANNUAL MAINTENANCE; APPROVE EXTRA REPAIR WORK FOR CITY FACILITIES NOT TO EXCEED $200,000; AND PERFORM INDOOR AIR QUALITY MODIFICATIONS AS NEEDED AT CITY-WIDE FACILITIES NOT TO EXCEED $10,000; TO BE FUNDED FROM 1001312-5304, 1025001-5304, 1700201-5304, 3281511-5300, 3281512-5300, 3281513-5300, 3281514-5300, 3281515-5300, 3281527-5300 AND 3283516-5300 RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council and Fire Board approve and authorize EMCOR Service/Mesa Energy Systems, Inc. (EMCOR Service) to continue as the single source service provider and installer for HVAC/control work and related energy management systems for city and fire district facilities at the same rates as fiscal year 2009-2010 in the amount of $215,767 for city facilities and $22,640 for fire district facilities for annual maintenance; approve extra repair work not to exceed $200,000 for city facilities and perform indoor air quality modifications as needed at city-wide facilities not to exceed $10,000; to be funded from 1001312-5304, 1025001-5304, 1700201-5304, 3281511-5300, 3281512-5300, 3281513-5300, 3281514-5300, 3281515-5300, 3281527-5300 and 3283516-5300. BACKGROUND ANALYSIS In August 2003, City Council approved EMCOR Service as the single source provider of HVAC services for City facilities. Due to their extensive knowledge of our systems, their work on integration for the Citywide Facilities, the addition of the Fire Stations under HVAC contract, EMCOR is uniquely qualified to remain as the single source vendor for HVAC and related Energy Management Systems. During fiscal year 2009-2010, staff completed a comprehensive inventory and currently is the process of preparing bid specifications. It is projected this contract will be ready to bi y January 2, /011. Res a ully s miffed, ~~r~ ,L,lt~~y~/~~j,~y ~G~„~'~1 ~l '~ "Ilf.~ ~G~/ ~~ C/lt~L'~ William Wittkopf, Public orks Services Director Mi e B I, Fire C i f VJW:TQlu P-111 STAFF REPORT EtiGINEERIVG SERV""ICES DEP~1RTbiF.NT Date: July 21, 2010 To: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack lam, AICP, City Manager From: Mark A. Steuer, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer By: Dan James, Senior Civil Engineer +r RANCHO C,UCAMUNGA Subject: APPROVAL OF ADDENDUM FOR THE USE OF CITY-OWNED CONDUIT WITH NEXTG NETWORKS OF CALIFORNIA, INC. A DELAWARE CORPORATION FOR RENTAL OF CITY OWNED CONDUIT RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends City Council approve the request from NextG to enter into an Addendum for the Use of City-Owned Conduit and authorize by minute action the Mayor and City Clerk to sign and attest thereto. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS NextG Networks of California, Inc., (NextG) is a wireless communications company headquartered in San Jose, California, which provides communications infrastructure of wireless service providers. NextG contacted the City in July 2008, to request deployment of their infrastructure within the public right-of-way under the Federal Telecommunications Act in order to improve wireless coverage and capacity in the City. NextG has a Cert~cate of Public Convenience and necessity from the Public Utilities Commission and is a member of Southern California Joint Pole Committee. At the City Council meeting of November 19, 2008, the City Council approved aRight-of-Way Use Agreement (contract 08-169). All terms of the Right-of-Way Use Agreement are in full force and effect. The Addendum for the Use of City Owned Conduit specifies rental fee and rights of both NextG and the City. In the planning and design of NextG's infrastructures, NextG became aware of existing City owned underground conduit when City fiber optic lines were installed several years ago. Allowing NextG will save unnecessary street excavation and provide revenue for the City. The rental amount is $1.50 per linear foot. NextG is using a total 16,137 linear feet. This equates to $24,205.50 per year of revenue for the City. The general limits of the City owned conduit are: Base Line Road from Milliken Avenue to Day Creek Blvd., Base Line Road from Victoria Park Lane to Etiwanda Avenue, Day Creek Blvd. from Base line Road to Foothill Blvd., Victoria Park lane from Base Line Road to Church Street. Respectfully submitted, ,:. Ma Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer MAS:DJ/alrw Attachment(s) i ~n ~~ o Im I~ w ~~ ~l J ` 1 P c ~' ~~ W ~ ~~ ~~ ~~ i ~7 ~~ r~ 'W W i S E io ° f ~~iw d ~ k>!4 f1~ ' ~ `•~uep '-.' 7 i -- °s ~=ei 1 vo. rt•±1 a x s. - ~ ~~~ ~~~ ~~ P-112 P-113 ~TAFF REPORT ~~ • ENGINEERING DEP.gRTr4ENT - 1Yi -~~ Date: July 21, 2010 To: Mayor and Members of the City Council RANCHO Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager G'UCAMONGA From: Joe Cusimano, Police Chief Mark Steuer, Director Engin Bring ServiceslCity Engineer By: Jon A. Gillespie, Traffic Engineer Akbar Rizvi, Associate Engineer- Traffic i"~ Keri Hinojos, CPPB, Senior Buyer Subject: AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD A CONTRACT TO ALL CITY MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC., AS A SINGLE SOURCE PROVIDER FOR PROFESSIONAL CROSSING GUARD SERVICES FOR THE 2010!2011 FISCAL YEAR, WITH AN OPTION TO RENEW FOR A ONE (1) YEAR PERIOD UP TO A TOTAL OF THREE (3) YEARS UPON REVIEW OF AND CITY AGREEMENT TO ANY PRICING CHANGES, IN THE AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $380,000.00 FROM ACCT. NO. 1001701-5300 (CONTRACT SERVICES). RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council approve the award of a contract to All City Management Services, Inc., as a single source provider for professional crossing guard services for the 2010/2011 fiscal year, with an option to renew for a one (1) year period up to a total of three (3) years upon review of and City agreement to any pricing changes, in the amount not to exceed $380,000.00 from Acct. No. 1001701-5300 (Contract Services). BACKGROUND ANALYSIS The City has been utilizing All City Management Services, Inc. for professional crossing guard services for the past five years. As the previous contract has expired; research was conducted to confirm that a single source justification would still be applicable. Findings indicate that All City Management Services, Inc. is still the only vendor that can provide crossing guard services to the City. Engineering/Traffic provided location specifications and a single source justification to the Purchasing Department. Purchasing then posted an invite only bid to the City's website, Request for Bid ("RFB") # 09!10-022. 4 After analysis of the bid response by the Police Chief, Director Engineering Services/City Engineer, Engineering Traffic Division and Purchasing Staff, it has been determined to be in the City's best interest that an award be authorized to All City Management Services, Inc. of Los Angeles, California, as a single source provider for professional crossing guard services for the 2010/2011 fiscal year, with an option to renew for a one (1) year period up to a total of three (3) years upon P-114 review of and City agreement to any pricing changes, in the from Acct. No. 1001701-5300 (Police Dept. Contract Services). in the Purchasing Department. Res a ully submitted, Joe Cusimano, Police Chief rk Steuer, Director Engineering Services/City Engineer !' amount not to exceed $380,000.00 All applicable bid details are on file P-115 PUI3i.iC WOR}:S SERI'ICES DEP_1RT,,\IENT RANCHO Date: July 21, 2010 ~ L;UCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager From: William Wittkopf, Public Works Services Director By: Ernest Ruiz, Streets, Storm Drains and Fleet Superintendent Paul Fisher, Management Aide Subject: ACCEPT THE "CITYWIDE STREET NAME SIGN REPLACEMENT - FY 09/10", CONTRACT NO. CO 10-001, AS COMPLETE; RETAIN THE FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND AS A GUARANTEE BOND; APPROVE THE RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE PUBLIC WORKS SERVICES DIRECTOR TO FILE A NOTICE OF COMPLETION, RELEASE THE LABOR AND MATERIALS BOND SIX MONTHS AFTER THE RECORDATION OF SAID NOTICE OF COMPLETION, AND APPROVE THE FINAL CONTRACT AMOUNT OF $62,354. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council accept the "Citywide Street Name Sign Replacement - FY 09/10", Contract No. CO 10-001, as complete; retain the Faithful Performance Bond as a Guarantee Bond; approve the resolution authorizing the Public Works Services Director to file a Notice of Completion, release the Labor and Materials bond six months after the recordation of said Notice of Completion, and approve the final contract amount of $62,354. BACKGROUND ANALYSIS The subject project has been completed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications and to the satisfaction of the Public Works Services Director. The "Citywide Street Name Sign Replacement - FY 09/10" scope of work included the fabrication and installation of retroreflective street name signs at 311 locations generally located between Milliken Avenue and Day Creek Boulevard. Pertinent information of the project is as follows: - Budgeted Amount: - Account Numbers: $75,000 1025001-5300 (Capital Reserve) - City Council's Approval to Advertise: October 21, 2009 - Publish dates for local paper: October 27 and November 3, 2009 - Bid Opening: - Contract Award Date: December 1, 2009 January 6, 2010 - Low Bidder: Maneri Sign Company, Inc. P-116 PUBLIC WORKS SERVICES DEPAR1TdENT STAFF REPORT Re: Accepx Citywide Street Nune Sign Replacement - FY 09/10 JULY 21,2010 P:1GE2OF2 - Contract Amount: $64,659 - Contingency: $ 6,466 - Final Contract Amount: $62,354 - Decrease in Contract Amount: $ 2,305 (4%) The contract amount decreased by $2,305 due to the elimination of twelve of the original 323 project locations. Re ec u ly s mitte , William Wittkopf Public Works Services Director WW:ER:pf P-117 RESOLUTION NO. /®-12 y A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR "CITYWIDE STREET NAME SIGN REPLACEMENT - FY 09/10" AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for the "Citywide Street Name Sign Replacement - FY 09/10" project have been completed to the satisfaction of the Public Works Services Director; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work is complete. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves that the work is hereby accepted and the Public Works Services Director is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. P-118 STAFF REI'®I~T ENGINEERING SERVICES DEP~RTMEIvT Date: July 21, 2010 To: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager From: Mark A. Steuer, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer By: Carlo Cambare, Engineering Technician fir RANCHO CUCAMONGA Subject: ACCEPT IMPROVEMENTS, RELEASE THE FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE CASH DEPOSIT, ACCEPT A MAINTENANCE CASH DEPOSIT AND FILE A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR IMPROVEMENTS FOR DRC2003-00048 LOCATED AT 13670 VICTORIA STREET, SUBMITTED BY BRUNO MANCINELLI CONSTRUCTION RECOMMENDATION The required improvements for DRC2003-00048 have been completed in an acceptable manner, and it is recommended that the City Council accept said improvements, authorize the 'City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Cash Deposit and accept a Maintenance Cash Deposit. BACKGROUNDIANALYSIS As a condition of approval of completion of DRC2003-00048, located at 13670 Victoria Street, the applicant was required to complete improvements. The improvements have been completed and it is recommended that the City Council release the existing Faithful Performance Cash Deposit and accept the Maintenance Cash Deposit. Developer: 7285 SVL BOX Victorville, CA 92395 Release: Faithful Performance Cash Deposit # CR128487 $52,500.00 (Receipt No.) Accept: Maintenance Cash Deposit #CR144076 $5,250.00 (Receipt No.) Respectfully submitted, M '~~~'~-~.. Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer MAS:CC/alrw Attachment(s) EXHIBIT A VICINITY MAP wcwwuoav .~ VI City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Services ®ivision DRC2003-00048 VICINITY MAP (Not to Scale) P-119 P-120 RESOLUTION NO. ~ ~- I Z S A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR DRC2003-00048 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the conskruction of public improvements for DRC2003-00048 have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work is complete. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. P-121 ST1~FF RE~'ORT ENGINEERING SERVICES DEP.~RTT~IcNT Date: July 21, 2010 To: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager From: Mark A. Steuer, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer By: Carlo Cambare, Engineering Technician RANCHO CUCAMONGA Subject: RELEASE OF FAITHFUL PERFOMANCE BOND RETAINED IN LIEU OF MAINTENANCE GUARANTEE BOND FOR PARCEL MAP 17594, LOCATED NORTHEAST CORNER OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND ROCHESTER AVENUE, SUBMITTED BY F & F, LLC RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bond retained in lieu of Maintenance Guarantee Bond, for Parcel Map 17594, located at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Rochester Avenue, submitted by F & F, LLC. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The required one-year maintenance period has ended and the storm drain improvements remain free from defects in materials and workmanship. DEVELOPER F & F, LLC 509 Rosemarie Drive Arcadia, CA 91007 Release: Faithful Performance Bond (in lieu of Maintenance) Respectfully submitted, #4361053 $87,600.00 nrtarirav.,~ae~er-- ~- _ ~,,. Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer MAS:CC/alrw Attachment(s) CITY OF RANCHO CUCA~ro~NGA ENGINEERING ®EPT ~` ~ .xn ,i ~ $#f ~,~ o ~ ax 's ~ 1 ~ I '~a~~,,` ~ ice- ~ ° ~c xs i' ~ ~ z t~kv _ ~ ( ~ ~ ~ PF ~ {It"~'C~'+~ t... { a [ ~~~~~Kt F F, w ;~`cx .~,~'S~r ~ ~R a • ,~ • ~~`~^,.~ .'~~--Y t~„fr~' I - ~iiil ~~ii~ *"Ny" E94 ~_ `[R. 3-~`L~. F( I~~~r ,~z - • s fl ,; ; • 7 i ~.9~ _.li SgY.g t tty s~,~;~• -~ a,#~; ~ ~ F. ~ - .s_~w~.~;m,,.y ~a{ :~ t ..~r:,a µ • =K .~:.~, r n~ V,a3~, c~ -: .Ya $ Y. a-~s '..a ~. I _ _ '' ~ { .~ }^+~yw .,:~i" iy1,~~"'L`JF+s ~' 1 .. ~,'~ r 9c.j,y~,,.~s ~" T ,F -y z g~ ~ ~ • ~ 6 ~ ~ ~ ~ F _ ~ ~?'^' ° A~FT Ts'r~~' ,..r-vyei'rp,,? .arr--- n. ~:., a sf 3~y _~ia-~ *"` T"~, J€ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ; ~,.x#3~ .ta ,6 Fi rr ~ ~, ~ a ,~.~ ~ ~ ~k ~^, .:- y~fi ~Sr'c ~` r4~, 1 4- `~ ". ~ ~1 ; `* -~''~-~'^`,it` x v ~ f ` ` ~ ' ~ ~ r f-. E r• - ~'"~ e Y ',`~ -i!F `~yy S'-c~, ~.1 ~ -y' V kE ~. sue'. r a ~1' uC : ._ r~i r's~, '- ~ 'Y~ #`- 4 ~y11 yy 3~ a, t a•'~~`a'-r~} `,,~y°`_ .M .fie ~+`'li~,' ' ".ate" ..~.r~ ~o--~. '^ ~. t :f ..-Pt . rt Z `>~~ d4 Y.~,~ _f f'.ifc y.bi~i" ~F~ ~'LGTL' Y. d~C ~~ ~ y '..~ t ~Y~Sr .~~_ 6 Fs ~b # ' T ~ s 'tY ~ -t ~ ~` st~'g '.z'~ ' "'r :, axy~ ~,-'Sad' a~~~-i,..x F'~' rte. ~~ ¢~ ~q f ~ i ~i w ~-~ - ~ is i ii s 3-Z`Y, -. ~" ~, a _ r x i ' ~` ~` ~ + ' ~ x ~: ---_-~-~ .~ .r----.-~=--.~ x j ~ A ...N - ~"`s~, ~ tlt;fie &~~tii73 t~ ;`#'~ ~ ~' ~ ~ > w : :~ {'`` atea,"' ~-- ~~ - s.,"'~ K atik -- f . -,~`~~ •~°~~ `` r • .-11 ~j ti y,.n ;f {~~,~9x,~i x ~ Grp, ~ ~ u ~~s4 • y 3~s.F ~.. r ~ 'it'IS~r"~.6'~.. r ~'L~or<~ *+r., t • w roc ~ ~' .i~l..1`+1,~ ' `~`.Sy: ~ 1. _ a.' y:' i ~ a t-~ '# 0 ~ i + { ~~ lam. { t ~Y 1 ~ j ~~~ F AtI.M+-q J• ~.' ~r~"} a ur Sr + r~ ~ ' I _ 7 ~F 5riq y ~ - a.-. ~'+. -~_.. ''"' t +~ e '.1~.. 1 . i ~wiow~..;~ 1 -*,~, )' a s ~~ r t A ,aw-a yt ~ ,:trf ~ ~. -f .. y. -.« r _. .~_~ M..~ .. ~.._.,.;~ -.,ir _ _,.. ... _.. -.... t.,7 Stu. ~....~.,r.a~r.~. ~::,e,re,..~-'^.. ar!t .t~.~i'..~'.. .«c.X .y. •~_ ~ x. ITEM: PM 17594 ~p VICINITY MAP TITLE: VICINITY MAP ~ (Not to Scale) EXHIBIT: A P-122 ,r STAFF ~ZEPORT ~ ~; ENGINEERI:JG SERVICES DEP.~A1'I~~1T jZANCxo Date: July 21, 2010 CUCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager From: Mark A. Steuer, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer By: Curt Billings, Associate Engineer (}A- Shelley Hayes, Assistant Enginee~~ Subject: ACCEPT THE HAVEN AVENUE PAVEMENT REHABILITATION FROM 4T" STREET TO FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, CONTRACT NO. 10-021 AS COMPLETE, RELEASE THE BONDS, ACCEPT A MAINTENANCE BOND, AND AUTHORIZE THE CITY ENGINEER TO FILE A NOTICE OF COMPLETION AND APPROVE THE FINAL CONTRACT AMOUNT OF $1,221,294.89 RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Ci#y Council accept the Haven Avenue Pavement Rehabilitation from 4rn Street to Foothill Boulevard, Contract No. 10-021, as complete, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion, release the Faithful Performance Bond, accept a Maintenance Bond, authorize the release of the Labor and Materials Bond in the amount of 51,197,794.00 six months after the recordation of said notice if no claims have been received and authorize the release of the retention in the amount of $122,129.49, 35 days after acceptance. Also, approve the final contract amount of $1,221,294.89. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The subject project has been completed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The Haven Avenue Pavement Rehabilitation from 4`h Street to Foothill Boulevard improvements scope of work consisted of the removing and replacing existing pavement, curb & gutter and sidewalk, cold planing, routing, crack sealing and dust blotter, installing asphalt concrete pavement, asphalt rubber overlay, striping, legends, pavement markers, and loops. Pertinent information of the project is as follows: - Budgeted Amount: - Account Numbers: - Engineer's Estimate: r City Council Approval to Advertise: Publish dates for local paper: - Bid Opening: - Contract Award Date: $1, 500,000.00 1176303-5650!1681176-0,1190303-5650/1355190- 0. 2660801-5650/1355660-0 $1,415,945.00 February 17, 2010 February 23 and March 2, 2010 March 9, 2010 March 17, 2010 P-123 P-124 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Re: Accept Haven Avenue Pavement Rehabilitation from 41h Street to Foothill Blvd. July 21, 2010 Page 2 - Low Bidder: R.J. Noble Company - Contract Amount: $1,197,794.00 - 10% Contingency: $119,779.40 - Final ContractAmount: 81,221,294.89 - Difference in Contract Amount: $23,500.89 (1.96%) The net increase in the total cost of the project is a result of three (3) Contract Change Orders including the Balancing Statement. The most notable change significant to the increase of the Contract amount was Contract Change Order No. 1 which installed base material along the shoulder of Haven Avenue where there was only edge of pavement. The Balancing Statement accounts for other minor increases and decreases in the project bid quantities. Respectfully submitted, Ma Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer MAS/CB/SH:Is Attachments P-125 VI~I~TIT~ ~IAP HILL51 E ~D ~ ~~ ~ BAN N ST ---tea ~ ~~~~ \~ EM0~1~ ~ VE U ~ ~ a --pal n'I =-~ N ~ ~ i 9Tu T 3~~ ~~ < ~ -~ Z W~ i w Z I rY ~ y ~ r • • v N B LINE D ~' z ~ a CHU H ST' TERRA l w W w >~ a FOOTHILL BLVD m a m ~ ai ARROW a RTE -, RROW ~I r i J ~,u~m V~ ,CTCP,I ?ARK ~N~1 BNSF ~ STH ST ~~ ~ , ~ ~ 4TH ST I 0 N -.~I } PROJECT _~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HAVEN AVENUE PAVEMENT REHABILITATION FROM 4TH STREET 'PO FOOTHILL BOULEVARD ,~: 4l ~`~~ N ~; N.T.S. P-126 RESOLUTION NO. IO- fz 6 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE HAVEN AVENUE PAVEMENT REHABILITATION FROM 4T" STREET TO FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, CONTRACT NO. 10-021 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the HAVEN AVENUE PAVEMENT REHABILITATION FROM 4rH STREET TO FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, Contract No. 10-021, has been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. STAFF REPORT RANCHO CL'CAMONGA FTRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Date: July 21, 2010 To: President and Members of the Board of Directors Jack Lam, A.I.C.P., City Manager From: Mark Hartwig, Deputy Chief By: Ingrid Bruce, GIS/Special Districts Manager Janet Walker, Management Analyst II P-127 ~; , RANCHO C',UCAMONGA Subject: CONSIDERATION OF THE SECOND READING OF AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE LEVY OF SPECIAL TAX INTHE MELLO-ROOS COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2010/2011 RECOMMENDATION Approval of the second reading of an ordinance continuing the Annual Special Tax Rates for Fiscal Year 2010111 in Mello-Roos Community Facilities District No. 85-1. BACKGROUND On July 7, 2010, staff provided a written staff report to the Fire Board regarding the proposed ordinance continuing the Annual Special Tax Rates for Fiscal Year 2010/11. The purpose of the ordinance is to adjust the special tax rate for Fiscal Year 2010/11 based upon the lesser of: (a) changes in cost of living; or (b) changes in cost of living and changes in population as defined in Section 7901 of the Government Code in the immediately preceding fiscal year, i.e., the methodology utilized to adjust the appropriations limit for the State and local agencies. For Fiscal Year 2010111, the State of California, Department of Finance methodology for adjusting appropriation limits for State and local agencies has been determined to be the appropriate method to determine the Fiscal Year 2010/11 rates. The Fire Board unanimously approved the proposed ordinance after the first reading. Resp ttully su fitted, Mark artwig Depu y Chief Attachment: Ordinance P-128 ORDINANCE NO. FD y9 AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE LEVY OF THE SPECIAL TAX IN MELLO-ROOS COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2010711 WHEREAS, a special election was held in the Mello-Roos Community Facilities District No. 85-1 (the "Community Facilities District") of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District (formerly Foothill Fire Protection District, the "District") on Tuesday, December 10, 1985; and WHEREAS, as a result of the election, more than two-thirds (2/3) of the qualified electors voted in favor of a proposition to authorize the levy of a special tax for fire suppression services and facilities, to establish an appropriations limit and to annually adjust the special tax and appropriations limit based upon changes in cost of living and changes in population; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 53340 of the Government Code, this Board of Directors is authorized, by ordinance, to annually levy a special tax at the rate and apportion the special tax in the manner specified in the resolution adopted pursuant to Article 2 (commencing with Section 53318 of the Government Code), except that this Board of Directors may levy the special tax at a lower rate; and WHEREAS, this Board of Directors desires to levy a special tax in the Community Facilities District for the fiscal year 2010/11. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby ordained as follows: SECTION 1. Levv of Special Tax. By the passage of this ordinance, this Board of Directors hereby authorizes and directs the levy of a special tax in the Community Facilities District for the fiscal year 2010/11 at the rate and apportioned in the manner set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof. SECTION 2. Exempt Properties. This Board of Directors hereby determines that properties or entities of the State, Federal or other local governments shall be exempt from such special tax. SECTION 3. Use of Special Tax. This Board of Directors hereby finds and determines that the special tax shall be used to pay, in whole or in part, the costs and expenses for facilities and services specified as follows: (a) The construction, acquisition, expansion andlor rehabilitation of public facilities, within or for the benefit of, the Community Facilities District generally described as follows: P-129 Fire protection and suppression facilities and appurtenances, including; equipment, real property and other tangible property with an estimated useful life of five years or longer. (b) The services to be provided within the Community Facilities District are generally described as follows: The performance by employees of functions, operations and maintenance and repair activities in order to provide fire protection within the Community Facilities District. (c) The repayment of advances and loans. The special tax shall be used solely for the purposes specified above and for no other purpose. SECTION 4. Collection of Special Tax. The special tax shall be collected in the same manner as ordinary ad valorem property taxes are collected and shall be subject to the same penalties and the same procedure and sale in case of delinquency as provided for ad valorem taxes. SECTION 5. Filing of Ordinance. The Secretary is hereby authorized and directed to file a certified copy of this ordinance with the Tax Collector of the County of San Bernardino as may be appropriate. SECTION 6. Publication of Ordinance. The Secretary is hereby authorized and directed to publish this ordinance once in a newspaper of general circulation and to maintain the ordinance for public inspection and distribution. SECTION 7. Publication: Effective Date. This ordinance was read on the _ day of July, 2010, and was adopted on the _ day of July, 2010 and shall take effect and be in force upon its adoption. Ordinance No. FD 10- Page 2 of 6 P-130 PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: ATTEST: day of , 2010. Donald J. Kurth, M.D., President Janice C. Reynolds, Secretary 1, JANICE C. REYNOLDS, SECRETARY of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance was introduced at a Regular Meeting of the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District held on the _ day of July 2010 and was passed at a Regular Meeting of the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District held on the day of 2010, at Rancho Cucamonga, California Executed this day of 2010, at Rancho Cucamonga, Calrfornia. Janice C. Reynolds, Secretary Ordinance No. FD 10- Page 3 of 6 P-131 EXHIBIT "A" SPECIAL TAX FOR FISCAL YEAR 2010/11 IN MELLO-ROOS COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1 RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT STRUCTURES Residential Multi-family 2 DU: 3 DU: 4 DU: 5-14 DU: 15-30 DU: 31-80 DU: 81 - up DU: ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX ($148.00) per DU 1.75 ($148.00) 2.25 ($148.00) 2.65 ($148.00) 2.65 ($148.00) + {.35 (TU - 4) ($148.00)} 6.15 ($148.00) + {.30 (TU - 14) ($148.00)} 10.65 ($148.00) + {.25 (TU - 30) ($148.00)} 23.15 ($148.00) + {.20 (TU - 80) ($148.00)} Commercial ($148.00) per acre + $.080 per SF Industrial ($148.00) per acre + $.098 per SF NOTE: DU =Dwelling Unit TU =Total Units SF =Square Foot Reduction Commercial and industrial structures shall be granted a .01 cent reduction in the Special Tax for the installation of complete sprinkler systems. In addition,. multi-floor commercial and industrial structures shall also be granted a .01 cent reduction (not cumulative) in Special Tax far each separate floor above or below the main ground floor of the structure. Ordinance No. FD 10- Page 4 of 6 P-7 32 MEMORANDUM RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PRO'1'EC'ITON DIS'L'RICT Date: July 21, 2010 To: President and Members of the Board of Directors Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager From: Mark Hartwig, Deputy Chief By: Janet Walker, Management Analyst II )~'~ 5 `~ ~ ~~ RANCHO CUCAMONGA Subject: ADOPiIONOFARESOLLfi10NMAKINGDETERMINATIONSREGARDINGTHEPROPOSED ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY (ALFONSO & KAY CARRILLO, 01MJERS -APN 1062321-35- ANNEXATION N0.88-10.2) TO AN EX1S71NG CONIMUNIIY FACILITIES DISTRICT, CAW NG A SPECIAL ELECTIONANDAUTHORIZING SUBMfffALOF L~M'OFSPECIALTAXESTOTHE QUALIFIED ELECTORS RECOMMENDATION Consideration of adoption of a Resolution making determinations and authorizing the submittal of the levy of special taxes to the qualified electors of territory proposed to be annexed (Alfonso & Kay Carrillo, Owners -Annexation No. 88-10-2) to existing Community Facilities District No. 88-1 ("CFD No. 88-1") and calling a special election for such purpose. BACKGROUND Alfonso & Kay Carrillo have submitted a proposal to construct a 946 sq.ft. granny house located at 9086 Peridot Ave., identified as Assessor's Parcel Number (APN) 1062-321-35 (the "Annexation Area") and is conditioned by the City and Fire District to annex into Community Facilities District (CFD) No. 88-1 in order to mitigate the development's impact upon fire protection services. On June 16, 2010, the Fire Board initiated formal annexation proceedings pursuant to the provisions of the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982 (the "Mello-Roos Act") by adopting Resolution No. FD 10-024 approving an Annexation Map (Exhibit "A") of the territory proposed to be annexed and the Resolution of Intention to Annex APN 1062-321-35 into the existing CFD No. 88-1. This Resolution, among other things, declared the intention of the Board of Directors to levy a special tax within the Annexation Area to finance fire protection and suppression services and setting a public hearing regarding the proposed annexation to be held on July 21, 2010. Through adoption of this resolution before the Board this evening, the Board will accomplish the following: Make certain determinations as set forth in the resolution Call for a special election to be conducted on July 28, 2010 Authorize submittal of the levy of the special tax to qualified electors of the Annexation Area at such special election P-133 ANNExATION OF TERRITORY 1'O AN HJCISTING G'D NO. 88-1 PAGE 2 WLY 21, 2010 ANALYSIS The annexation of the Annexation Area into CFD No. 88-1 will satisfy the conditions of development relating to mitigating impacts upon fire protection services. Alfonso & Kay Carrillo, property owners, are in full support of the annexation of the property being annexed. Pursuant to the Mello-Roos Act, whenever there have been less than 12 persons registered to vote within the Annexation Area for each of the 90 days preceding the public hearing pertaining to such annexation, the vote shall be by the landowners within the Annexation Area. Therefore, in the current circumstances, the election will be a landowner's vote, the landowner having one vote per acre or portion thereof of land within the Annexation Area. Alfonso & Kay Carrillo, owners of the property within the Annexation Area, has executed a "Consent and Waiver" of time frames relating to the election. Exhibit "A" of the Resolution sets forth the rate and method of apportionment of the special tax proposed to be levied within the Annexation Area which is consistent with the special tax levied upon all territory currently within CFD No. 88-1. At the special election to be held on July 28, 2010; the landowner will be entitled to cast its ballot. The Board Secretary will then canvas the ballot, if received. At the next Board meeting, the Board will consider adopting the Resolution declaring the election results and the annexation of the Annexation Area to CFD 88-1. If 2/3rds of the votes cast are in favor of the levy of the special tax, the Board may declare the property to be annexed. The Public Notice regarding the Public Hearing has been advertised in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin. Mark ~lartwig Deputy Chief Attachments: 1. Annexation Map 2. Resolution 3. CFD No. 88-1 Map P-1 SHEET 1 OF 1 ANNEXATION MAP 88-10-2 OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO 88-1 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO. STATE OF CALIFORNIA NOTE: THIS ANNE%ATION MAP SHALL GOVERN FDR ALL DETAIL6 A6 i0 THE EKRFNT OF THE TERRRORY ANNE%EO TO THE ABOVE REFERENCED COMMUNRY fACILRIES DISTRICT RApCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT CERTIFICATION FlLED IN THE OFFICE OF THE 6ECRETARY OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DI6TRICT. CALIFORN0. THI6__DAY 3818 ASST. SECRETARY RARCNO CUCAMONGA FlRE PRDTECTON DISTRICT STATE OF CALIFORNIA 1 HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE WRHIN MAP SNO WINO BOUNDARIES OF TEaIRORY PROPO6E0 TO BE ANNEXED TO COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISBUCT N0.841 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FNiE PROTECTION OISIiUCT, COUNTY Of SAN BERNAROINO, 6TATE OF CALIFORNIA, WAB APFtOYEO BY THE BOARD OF DIRERORS OF SUCH FIRE PROTECTION DISTPoCTAT A REGULAR MEETING THEREOF, HELD ON THE_OAY OF ____3810, BY R9 RESOLUTION N0.___ tH64NHE%ATION MAP AMENDS THE BOUNDARY MAP FOR CO~IUNRY FACILITIES DISTRICT NOJB-1 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, COUNTY OF BAN BERNAROINO, 6TATE DF CAIFORNIA, PRIOR RECORDED ON __~AT e00N____OF MAP6 OFABSEB6MENT ANO.COMNUNITY FACILRIES DI6TRICT6. AT PAOE____~ IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNfY RECORDER FOR THECOUNTY Of SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA. ASST. SECRETARY RANCHO CULAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT 6TATE OF CALIFORNIA LEGAL DESCRIPTION o N ~Q~ r.. 1 inch equals 30 feet ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMBER 106232136 LOT 28 OF TRACT NO. 933J, IN THE CRY OF RANCHO CUCAMONOA, IN THE COUNTY OF 9AN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNU, AB PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 1]3, PAGEIS) B1 TO 8]' INCLUSIVE, Of NAPE, IN THE OFFICE OF THE ' COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY. R C THIS MAP NA6 BEEN FlLED UNDER DOCUMENT NUMBER-__THIS OAY OF _______, SOfO, AT-__M. IN BOOK__OF MAPS OF ABBEBSMEN7 ANO COMMUNITY FALILRIES DISTRICTS AT PAGE_AT THE REOUE6T OF _______ IN TKE AMDUNT OFf_ -_-_ URRY WALKER AUDITOR/CONTROLLER-RECORDER COUNTY OF BAN BERNAROINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA ' DEPUTY RECORDER P-135 RESOLUTION NO. FD 10-0~~ A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, MAKING CERTAIN DETERMINATIONS REGARDING THE PROPOSED ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY (ANNEXATION NO. 88-10-2) TO AN EXISTING COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT (CFD 88-1) AND CALLING A SPECIAL ELECTION AND AUTHORIZING THE SUBMITTAL OF THE LEVY OF SPECIAL TAXES TO THE QUALIFIED ELECTORS OF SUCH TERRITORY WHEREAS, the BOARD OF DIRECTORS (the"Board of Directors") of the RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT (the "Fire Protection District"), RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, has previously declared its intention and held and conducted proceedings relating to the annexation of territory to an existing community facilities district pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982", being Chapter 2.5, Part 1, Division 2, Title 5 of the Government Code of the State of California, and specifcal!y Article 3.5 thereef (the "Act"). The existing Community Facilities District has been designated as COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-1 (the "District"); and, WHEREAS, notice of a public hearing relating to the annexation of territory to the District, the extent of the territory to be annexed (the "Annexation Area"), the furnishing of certain public services and ail other related matters has been given; and, WHEREAS, it has now been determined that written protests have not been received by 50% or more of the registered voters residing either within the Annexation Area or the District and/or property owners representing more than one-half (1 /2} or more of the area of land within the Annexed Area or within District; and, WHEREAS, inasmuch as there have been Tess than twelve (12) persons registered to vote within the Annexation Area for each of the 90 preceding days, this legislative body desires to submit the levy of the required special tax to the landowners of the Annexation Area, said landowners being the qualified electors as authorized by law. NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District does hereby resolve as follows: SECTION 1. RECITALS The above recitals are ail true and correct. SECTION 2. DETERMINATIONS It is determined by this Board of Directors that: A. all proceedings prior hereto were valid and taken in conformity with the requirements of law, and specifically the provisions of the Act; B. less than twelve (12) registered voters have resided within the Annexation Area for each of the ninety (90) days preceding the close of the public hearing and, consequently, the qualified electors shall be the landowners of the Annexation Area and each landowner who is the owner of record as of the close of the public hearing, or the authorized representative thereof, shall have one vote for each acre or portion of an acre of land that she or he owns within the Annexation Area; P-136 C. the time limit specified by the Act for conducting an election to submit the levy of the special taxes to the qualified electors of the Annexation Area and the requirements for impartial analysis and ballot arguments have been waived with the unanimous consent of the qualified electors of the Annexation Area; D. the Secretary, acting as the election official, has consented to conducting any required election on a date which is less than 125 days following the adoption of this resolution; and E. the public services proposed to be financed from the proceeds of special taxes to be levied within the Annexation Area are necessary to meet increased demands placed upon the Fire Protection District as a result of development andlor rehabilitation occurring in the Annexation Area. SECTION 3. BOUNDARIES OF ANNEXED AREA The boundaries and parcels of land in the Annexation Area and on which special taxes are proposed to be levied in order to pay the costs and expenses for the public services described in Section 4 below are generally described as follows: All that property and territory proposed to be annexed to the District, as said property is shown on a map as previously approved by this legislative body, said map entitled "Annexation Map No. 88-10-2 of Community Facilities District No. 88-1 of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, County Of San Bernardino, State Of California" (the "Annexation Map"), a copy of which is on file in the Office of the Secretary and shall remain open for public inspection. SECTION 4. DESCRIPTION OF SERVICES The services that are authorized to be financed from the proceeds of special taxes levied within the District are certain services which are in addition to those services required for the territory within the District and will not be replacing services already available. A general description of the services authorized to be financed by the District is as follows: The performance by employees of functions, operations, maintenance and repair activities in order to provide fire protection and suppression services. The District shall finance all direct, administrative and incidental annual costs and expenses necessary to provide such services. The same types of services which are authorized to be financed by the District from the proceeds of special taxes levied within the District are the types of services proposed to be financed from the special taxes proposed to be levied within the Annexation Area. If and to the extent possible such services shall be provided in common with District and the Annexation Area. SECTION 5. SPECIAL TAX Except where funds are otherwise available and subject to the approval of the qualified electors of the Annexation Area, a special tax sufficient to pay for the services described in Section 4 that are required for the Annexation Area, secured by recordation of a continuing lien against all non-exempt real property in the Annexation Area will be levied annually within the boundaries of the Annexation Area. For particulars as to the rate and method of apportionment of the proposed special tax, reference is made to the attached and incorporated Exhibit "A" which sets forth insufficient detail the method of apportionment to allow each landowner or resident within the Annexation Area to clearly estimate the maximum amount of the special tax that such person will have to pay. The special taxes shall be collected in the same manner as ad valorem property taxes and shall be subject to the same penalties, procedure, sale and lien priority in any case of delinquency, as applicable for Resolution No. FD 10- -Page 2 of 8 P-137 ad valorem taxes; however, as applicable, this Board of Directors may, by resolution, establish and adopt an alternate or supplemental procedure as necessary. Any special taxes that may not be collected on the County tax roll shall be collected through a direct billing procedure by the Treasurer of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, acting for and on behalf of the District. SECTION 6. SPECIAL TAX ACCOUNTABILITY MEASURES Pursuant to and in compliance with the provisions of Government Code Section 50075.1, this Board of Directors hereby establishes the following accountability measures pertaining to the levy by the District of the special taxes within the Annexation Area as described in Section 5 above: A. Each such special tax shall be levied for the specific purposes section in Section 5. above. B. The proceeds of the levy of each such special tax shall be applied only to the specific applicable purposes set forth in Section 5. above. C. The District shall establish a separate account into which the proceeds of the special taxes levied within the District shall be deposited. D. The Fire Chief or his or her designee, acting for and on behalf of the Districf, shall annually file a report with the Board of Directors as required pursuant to Government Code Section 50075.3. SECTION 7. ELECTION The proposition related to the levy of the special tax shall be submitted to the qualified electors of the Annexation Area, said electors being the landowners, with each landowner having one (1) vote for each acre or portion thereof of land which he or she owns within said annexed territory. The special election shall be held on the 28th day of JULY 2010, and said election shall be a special election to be conducted by the Secretary (hereinafter "Election Official"). If the proposition for the levy of the special tax receives the approval of more than two-thirds (2/3) of the votes cast on the proposition, the special tax may be levied as provided for in this Resolution and the Board of Directors may determine that the Annexation Area is added to and part of the District. SECTION 8. BALLOT The ballot proposal to be submitted to the qualified voters at the election shall generally be as follows: PROPOSITION A RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-1, AUTHORIZATION FOR SPECIAL TAX LEVY Shall Community Facilities District No. 88-1 of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District be authorized to levy special taxes within the territory shown on "Annexation Map No. 88-10-2 of Community Facilities District No. 88-1 of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, County Of San Bernardino, State Of California" (the "Annexation Map") pursuant to the rate and method of apportionment of special taxes (the "Special Tax Formula") set forth in Ordinance No. FD 10-031 to finance fire suppression and protection services and administrative expenses? Resolution No. FD 10- -Page 3 of 6 P-138 SECTION 9. VOTE The appropriate mark placed in the voting square afterthe word "YES" shall be counted in favor of the adoption of the proposition, and the appropriate mark placed in the voting square after the word "NO" in the manner as authorized, shall be counted against the adoption of said proposition. SECTION 10. ELECTION PROCEDURE The Election Official is hereby authorized to take any and all steps necessary for the holding of said election. Said Election Official shall perform and render all services and proceedings incidental to and connected with the conduct of said election, and said services shall include, but not be limited to the following: A. Prepare and furnish to the election officers necessary election supplies for the conduct of the election. Cause to be printed the requisite number of official ballots, tally sheets and other necessary forms. C. Furnish and address official ballots for the qualified electors of the Annexation Area. D. Cause the official ballots to be mailed and/or delivered, as required by law. E. Receive the returns of the election. Sort and assemble the election material and supplies in preparation for the canvassing of the returns. G. Canvass the returns of the election. H. Furnish a tabulation of the number of votes given in the election. Make all arrangements and take the necessary steps to pay all costs of the election incurred as a result of services performed for the District and pay costs and expenses of all election officials. Conduct and handle all other matters relating to the proceedings and conduct of the election in the manner and form as required by law. Resolution No. FD 10- -Page 4 of 6 P-139 PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: ATTEST: Janice C. Reynolds, Secretary day of 2010. Donald J. Kurth, M.D., President I, JANICE C. REYNOLDS, SECRETARY of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, at a Regular Meeting of said Board held on the _ day of 2010. Executed this _ day of 2010 at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Janice C. Reynolds, Secretary Resolution No. FD 10- -Page 5 of 6 P-140 EXHIBIT "A" RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-1 SPECIAL TAX LEVY FISCAL YEAR 2010!11 TAXING CLASSIFICATION 1. DEVELOPED PROPERTY A. Residential Class I (more than 3590 SF) B. Residential Class II (3077 to 3589 SF) C. Residential Class III (2564 to 3076 SF) D. Residential Class IV (2308 to 2563 SF) E. Residential Class V (2051 to 2307 SF) F. Residential Class VI (1795 to 2050 SF) G. Residential Class VII (less than 1795 SF) SPECIAL TAX LEVY FISCAL YEAR 2010/11 $451.90 $348.29 $277.13 $242.18 $209.71 $191.00 $172.25 Commercialllndustrial Property 2. APPROVED PROPERTY 3. VACANT PROPERTY SF =Square Feet $695.32 per acre or $0.062 per square foot or building area, whichever is greater. $200.00 per lot or parcel $10.00 per acre Resolution No. FD 10- -Page 6 of 6 ti N ~ ~ O ~ dO ~` N M C~ ~ N C ~ ~~ Z o ~w !~ N a~ ~~ r ~ ~ - ~ ~ J = U 0 U J ny l~~~ay~ ~ ~ r. ~~ ~ J ti.r m c _ J CO ~ ~ L 3 ~ O ~ I ~_______ _____ _.___1_-_ ny ua~{!If!W a 0 r iSe3 in v "'-"-'1 ny epuenn!33 ny ~aisayoo~ ~ -- --------i----~-~ -----~-------~ ny ~aisayoo~ ~ ; '~ ` - i ~ -~.. • j ~ I I ~ ny ua~{!II!W ' f ~'; ~ e ,,.. f ~ ~ ~ ~ %~ i nb uaneH ;--..-----_ ~--f--~----=----__ ---' --~----_ . i ~ i i i° '' nd aaH ~_-__._~ --r-- ~---_ _-_.v--- i 1 ~ l r ny ueuailaH ~ o _~-. ~»___ i-- __ -r 1 '; ~ ~ 1 ~ o 1 i ~ ' ' c c ~~..i ~~. -p ~ fII ~ c m a~ ~, ~ ~ N ~ _ - . 7 .. ~y . ~ ~ - I ~ ny uaneH ~~' any esou~~aH ~__..__._..~- __-- _s ~ Inb Pleq!yo~td _.___..._......_ ~~,..-~ ny ueuallaH ~ •-' ,~• L ~ ny p~e/(auln CO O ~ F~g~p~g EF o ~ ~F~$~pT3~` ~ ¢ ~Qgr~f~i~:s F ~~€ € ~ ~~ ~~jsx~ 11 G frfrL STAFF REPORT ADMINISTRATR~E SERVICES DEP.~,RTMENT Date: July 21, 2010 To: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager From: John R. Gillison, Assistant City Manage By: Ingrid Bruce, GIS/Special Districts Manager Subject: CONSIDERATION TO APPROVE THE RESOLUTION CONFIRMING THE DIAGRAMS AND ASSESSMENTS AND ORDERING THE LEVY AND COLLECTION OF ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS FOR LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO'S. 1, 2, 3A, 3B, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 AND 10 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2010/2011. NO INCREASE OF ASSESSMENT RATE IS PROPOSED RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council approve the Resolution confirming the Diagrams and Assessments and ordering the levy and collection of assessments within Landscape Maintenance District No's. 1, 2, 3A, 3B, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10. There is no increase to the current rates in these districts proposed for Fiscal Year 201C/2011. The Engineer's Reports are on file in the City Clerk's Office. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Each year, per the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972, the City is required to hold a public hearing to receive public comment on the levy and collection of assessments within Landscape Maintenance District (LMD) No's 1, 2, 3A, 3B, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10 (each, a "district" and collectively the Districts). This requirement must be accomplished before the City can submit the annual assessments for placement on the County Tax Roll. With respect to LMD 4-R, on December 2, 2009, ballots were tabulated from Proposition 218 ballot proceedings, and the residents within LMD No. 4-R approved a rate increase. At that time, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 09-237 approving assessments and confirming the levy for Fiscal Year 2010/2011 for LMD 4-R, including the Engineer's Reports used as part of the Proposition 218 assessment ballot procedure. Accordingly, LMD 4-R is not part of this staff report as all necessary documentation for LMD 4-R was already previously approved by the City Council and submitted to the County Assessor's Office. The following, along with reference to the Engineer's Reports for the Districts, identifies proposed Fiscal Year 2010/2011 assessment rates. The Engineer's Reports identify the required budget for each of the Districts, including the surplus, if any, remaining in the fund balance for any District. The City utilizes prior year carryovers along with current year revenues to meet the districts annual expenses. It has been determined, as stated in the Landscape Maintenance Districts Fiscal Year 2010/2011 Engineer's Reports that the assessment rates remain unchanged from the previous Fiscal Year 2009/2010 rates; however, it will be necessary to review the assessment rates for LMDs 1 and 2 during Fiscal Year 2010/11, as those rates will be insufficient to maintain the current P-143 RESOLUTION CONFIRMING THE DIAGRAMS AND ASSESSMENTS AND ORDERING THE LEW AND P.SGE 2 COLLECTION OF ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS FOR LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO'S. 1, 2, 3A, 36, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, AND 1 O FOR FISCAL YEAR 2010-2011 JULY 21, 2010 levels of service during Fiscal Year 2011/2012, due to increasing costs. At the appropriate time, staff will initiate the Proposition 218 process for voter review. The assessment rates and Districts description for each of the Landscape Maintenance Districts are as follows: Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 assessments pay for the on-going maintenance of parkways. The current assessment rate is $92.21 per single-family residence, and the multi-family is $46.11 per dwelling unit. Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 assessments pay for the on-going maintenance of parkways, paseos and an equestrian trail within the Victoria Planned Community. The current assessment rate is $422.00 per single-family residence. The commercial rate is $844.00 per acre, and the vacant rate is $105.50 per acre. Landscape Maintenance District No. 3A assessments pay for the on-going maintenance of parkways on Hyssop Drive. The current assessment rate is $413.74 per acre for commercial property. Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B assessments pay for the on-going maintenance of parkways within the commercial and industrial area of the City. The current assessment rate is $352.80 per acre for commercial property. Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 assessments pay for the on-going maintenance of a Tot Lot located on the southwest comer of Andover Place and Bedford Drive. The current assessment rate is $113.29 per single-family residence. Landscape Maintenance District No. 6 assessments pay for the on-going maintenance of parkways and paseos within the Caryn Planned Community. The current assessment rate is $246.97 per single-family residence. Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 assessments pay for the on-going maintenance of parkways and paseos within the Etiwanda Highlands Community. The current assessment rate is $307.05 per single-family residence. Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 assessments pay for the on-going maintenance of parkways in South Etiwanda. The current assessment rate is $151.45 per single-family residence. Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 assessments pay for the on-going maintenance of parkways in South Etiwanda. The current assessment rate is $387.94 per single-family residence. Landscape Maintenance District No. 10 assessments pay for the on-going maintenance of parkways in the future University Crest Project. The current assessment rate is $616.20 per single- family residence and $1,232.40 per acre for commercial property. Attachments Resolutions Engineer's Reports P-144 RESOLUTION NO. JD~I.Z A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONFIRMING THE DIAGRAMS AND THE ASSESSMENTS AND ORDERING THE LEVY AND COLLECTION OF THE ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS WITHIN LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS NO'S. 1, 2, 3A, 36, AND 5 THROUGH 10, INCLUSIVE, FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2010/2011 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga did on the 16th day of June, 2010, adopt its Resolution of Intention No, 10-093 (the "Resolution of Intention") pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, as amended (the "1972 Act"), declaring its intention to levy and collect assessments vdithin Landscape Maintenance Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3A, 36, and 5 through 10, inclusive, (each, a "District" and collectively, the "Districts") for Fiscal Year 2010/2011 and giving notice of the time and place for a public hearing by the City Council on the levy of the proposed assessments within the Districts; and WHEREAS, the City Council previously received and preliminarily approved a report of the Assessment Engineer (each, an "Annual Engineer's Report" and collectively, the "Annual Engineer's Reports") for each District as required pursuant to Article 4 of Chapter 1 of the 1972 Act, Article XIIID of the Constitution of the State of California ("Article XIIID") and the Proposition 218 Omnibus Implementation Act (Government Code Section 53750 and following) (the "Implementation Act") (the 1972 Act, Article XIIID and the Implementation Act are referred to collectively as the "Assessment Law"); and WHEREAS, subsequent to the preliminary approval of the Annual Engineer's Reports, the Assessment Engineer revised each of the Annual Engineer's Reports (each, a "Revised Annual Engineer's Report" and collectively, the "Revised Annual Engineer's Reports") to add to such reports information regarding the annexations, if any, to each applicable District during Fiscal Year 2009/2010 and to make certain other insubstantial formatting revisions to the summary of assessments and the District budgets that did not result in an increase of the expenditure budget for the Districts, or any one of them, or the aggregate assessments or any individual assessment proposed to be levied within the Districts, or any one, of them; and WHEREAS, notice of such public hearing was duly and legally published in the time, form and manner as required by the Assessment Law, shown by the affidavit of Publication of said Resolution of Intention on file in the Office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, said City Council having duly received and considered evidence, oral and documentary, concerning the jurisdiction facts in this proceeding and concerning the necessity for the contemplated work and the benefits to be derived there from and said City Council having now acquired jurisdiction to order the proposed work. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, DETERMINED AND ORDERED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, as follows: SECTION 1. This City Council hereby finds and determines that: A. Notice of the public hearing has been given and the proceedings for the consideration of the levy of the annual assessments within each District have been undertaken in accordance with the 1972 Act; and P-145 B. The annual assessments for Fiscal Year 2010/11 proposed to be levied within each District as set forth in the applicable Revised Annual Engineer's Report do not exceed the annual assessments as previously authorized to be levied within such District and, therefore, the proposed levy of assessments for Fiscal Year 2010/2011 within such District are not deemed to be "increased° over the maximum authorized annual assessments. SECTION 2. The final assessments and diagrams for the proceedings, as contained in the Revised Annual Engineer's Report for each of the District, is hereby approved and confirmed. The assessments for the Districts contained in the Revised Annual Engineer's Reports for Fiscal Year 2010/2011 are hereby levied upon the respective lots or parcels in the Districts ih the amounts as set forth in applicable Revised Annual Engineer's Report. SECTION 3. This City Council hereby orders that the work, as set forth and described in the Resolution of Intention, be done and made. SECTION 4. The above-referenced diagram and assessment shall be filed in the Office of the City Clerk. Said diagram and assessment, and the certified copy thereof, shall be open for public inspection. SECTION 5. The City Clerk is hereby ordered and directed to immediately file a certified copy of the diagram and assessment with the County Auditor. Such filing shall be made no later than the 3rd Monday in August 2010. SECTION 6. After the filing of the diagram and assessment, the County Auditor shall enter on the County assessment roll opposite each lot or parcel of land the amount assessed thereupon, as shown in the assessment. SECTION 7. The assessments shall be collected at the same time and in the same manner as County taxes are collected, and all laws providing for the collection and enforcement of County taxes shall apply to the collection and enforcement of the assessments. SECTION 8. The assessments as above confirmed and levied for these proceedings will provide revenue and relate to the fiscal year commencing July 1, 2010 and ending June 30, 2011. PASSED, APROVED AND ADOPTED this AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: ATTEST: day of , 2010. Donald J. Kurth, MD, Mayor Janice Reynolds, City Clerk P-146 I, Janice Reynolds, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a Meeting of said Council on the day of , 2010. Executed this day of , 2010 at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Janice Reynolds, City Clerk P-147 Revised Annual engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2010/2011 City of Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 (General City) P-148 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (GENERAL CITY) 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Phone: 909.477.2740 Fax: 909.477.2741 CITY COUNCIL Donald J. Kurth, Mayor L. Dennis Michael, Mayor Pro Tem Rex Gutierrez, Council Member Sam Spagnolo, Council Member Diane Williams, Council Member CITY STAFF John R. Gillison, Assistant City Manager Linda D. Daniels, Deputy City Manager William Wittkopf, Public Works Director Jeff Barnes, Park and Landscape Superintendent Ingrid Y. Bruce, GIS/Special Districts Manager Christopher Bopko, Management Analyst III P-149 TABLE OF CONTENTS ENGINEER'S LETTER INTRODUCTION 1 3 Reason for Assessment .............................................................................................3 Process for Annual Assessment .................................................................................3 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS 5 Description of the Boundaries of the District ...............................................................5 Description of Improvements and Services ................................................................5 Map of Improvements ...............................................................................................13 ESTIMATE OF COSTS 14 District Budget ..........................................................................................................14 Definitions of Budget Items .......................................................................................15 METkOD OF ASSESSMEI'JT 17 General .................................................................................................................:...17 Special Benefit .........................................................................................................17 General Benefit ........................................................................................................18 Method of Assessment Spread ................................................................................18 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM ASSESSMENT ROLL ZO 21 Assessment Roll .......................................................................................................21 Annexations ..............................................................................................................21 P-150 ENGINEER'S LETTER WHEREAS, on ,the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 (the "1972 Act") adopted its Resolution No. _, a Resolution Initiating Proceedings for the Levy of Annual Assessments for Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 (General City) (the "District"); and WHEREAS, the Resolution Initiating Proceedings directed NBS to prepare and file an Engineers Report for Fiscal Year 2010/11 pursuant to the requirements of the 1972 Act. The Engineer's Report presents the plans and specifications. describing the general nature, location and extent of the improvements to be maintained, an estimate of the costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements for the District for the referenced fiscal year, a diagram for the District, showing the area and properties proposed to be assessed, and an assessment of the estimated costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing the improvements, assessing the net amount upon all assessable lots and/or parcels within the District in proportion to the special benefit received: and NOW THEREFORE, fhe following assessment is proposed to be authorized in order to pay the estimated costs of maintenance, operation and servicing of the improvements to be paid by the assessable real property within the boundaries of the District in proportion to the special benefit received. The fo!lo~ving table summarizes the proposed assessment. SUMMARY OF ASSESSMENT Fiscal Year 2010/11 Total Estimated Assessment $1,189,642.70 Less Anticipated Delinquencies (56 722.701 Total Estimated Revenue $1,132,920.00 Plus Reserve Fund Contribution 312.580.00 Total Expenditure Budget $1,445,500.00 Total District EDU Count 12,901.45 Actual Assessment per EDU $92.21 Maximum Allowable Assessment per EDU $92.21 In making the assessments contained herein pursuant to the 1972 Act: I have identified all parcels which will have a special benefit conferred upon them from the improvements described in the Special Benefit Section of this Engineer's Report (the "Specially Benefited Parcels"). For particulars as to the identification of said parcels, reference is made to the Assess~~ent Diagrm, a copy of which is included in this engineer's Report. 2. I have evaluated the costs and expenses of the improvements upon the Specially Benefited Parcels. In making such evaluation: Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2010/11 P-151 a. The proportionate special benefit derived by each Specially Benefited Parcel from the improvements was determined in relationship to the entirety of the maintenance costs of the improvements; b. No assessment has been imposed on any Specially Benefited Parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on such parcel from the improvements; and c. Any general benefits from the improvements have been separated from the special benefits and only special benefits have been assessed. I, the undersigned, respectfully submit the enclosed Engineer's Report and, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, the Engineer s Report, Assessments, and the Assessment Diagram herein have been prepared and computed in accordance with the order of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Assessment Law. Mark A. Steuer, City Engineer Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2D10/11 P-152 INTRODUCTION Reason for Assessment Approval of the assessment covered by this Engineer's Report will generate the revenue necessary to: Provide for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements described in this Engineer's Report. Maintenance may include but is not limited to, all of the following: the repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement, providing for the life, growth, health and beauty of the landscaping, including cultivation, irrigation, trimming, spraying, fertilizing or treating for disease or injury, the removal of trimming, rubbish, debris and other solid waste, the maintenance, repair and replacement as necessary of all irrigation systems and the removal of graffiti from walls immediately adjacent to the cultivated areas. Servicing means the furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operating and servicing of any improvement. Servicing shall also include vehicle, equipment, capital improvements and administrative costs associated with the annual administration and operation of the District. Process for Annual Assessment The City cannot levy and collect annual assessments within the District without complying with the procedures specified in the 1972 Act. On an annual basis, an Engineer's Report must be prepared which contains a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the district. The City Council must also adopt a resolution of intention which: • Declares the intention of the City Council to levy and collect assessments within the assessment district for the fiscal year stated therein. • Generally describes the existing and proposed improvements and any substantial changes proposed to be made in existing improvements. Refers to the assessment district by its distinctive designation and indicate the general location of the district. • Refers to the report of the engineer, on file with the clerk, for a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the district. • Gives notice of the time and place for public hearing by the City Council on the levy of the proposed assessment, • States whether the assessment is proposed to increase from the previous year. If the assessments are to be levied in the same or lesser amounts than the maximum assessment amount approved, the clerk shall give notice by causing the resolution of intention to be published. Any interested person may, prior to the cohclusion of the public hearing, file a written protest which shall state all grounds of objection. The protest shall contain a description sufficient to identify the property owned by the property owner filing the protest. During the course or upon conclusion of the hearing, the City Council may order changes in any of the matters provided in the report, including changes in the improvements, any zones within the assessment district, and the proposed diagram or the proposed assessment. The City Council, upon conclusion of the public hearing must then adopt a resolution confirming the diagram and assessment, either as originally proposed or as changed by it. The adoption of the resolution shall constitute the levy of an assessment for the fiscal year referred to in the assessment. Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 3 Fiscal Year 2010/11 P-153 If the assessment to be levied exceeds the maximum assessment amount previously approved, the City must comply with the procedures specified in Article XIII D and Proposition 218. The voters in the State of California in November 1996 added Article XIII D to the Califomia Constitution imposing, among other requirements, the necessity for the City to conduct an assessment ballot procedure to enable the owners of each property on which assessments are proposed to be enacted or increased, the opportunity to express their support for, or opposition to the proposed assessment or increase in such assessment. The basic steps of the assessment ballot procedure are outlined below. The City must prepare a Notice of Public Hearing ("Notice"), which describes, along with other mandated information, the reason for the proposed assessments, and to provide a date and time of a public hearing to be held on the matter. The City must also prepare an assessment ballot, which clearly gives the property owner the ability to sign and mark their assessment ballot either in favor of, or in opposition to the proposed assessment. The Notice and assessment ballot are mailed to each affected property owner within the District a minimum of 45 days prior to the public hearing date as shown in the Notice. The City may also hold community meetings with the property owners to discuss the issues facing the District and to answer property owner questions directly. After the Notice and assessment ballot are mailed, property owners are given until the close of the public hearing, stated in the Notice, to return their signed and marked assessment ballot. During the public hearing, property owners are given the opportunity to address the City Council and ask questions or voice their concerns. At the public hearing, the returned assessment ballots received prior to the close of the public hearing are tabulated, weighted by the proposed assessment amount on each property and the results are announced by the City Council. Article XIII D provides that if, as a result of the assessment ballot proceeding, a majority protest is found to exist, the City Council shall not have the authority to levy and collect the assessments as proposed. A majority protest exists if the assessments represented by ballots submitted in opposition exceed those submitted in favor of the assessment. All returned ballots are tabulated and weighted according to the financial obligation of each particular parcel. If there is no majority protest as described above, the City Council may approve the proposed assessments. If there is a majority protest, as described above, the City will not levy and collect any assessments. Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 4 Fiscal Year 2010111 P-7 54 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS The District provides for the administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing of various improvements located within the public right-of-way and dedicated easements within the boundaries of the District. Description of the Boundaries of the District The District is located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California. The boundaries of the District are generally described as that area of the City which is not located within the City's planned development communities. The District is made up of various landscaped sites throughout the City. As such, the parcels within the District do not represent a distinct district area as do the other LMDs within the City. Typically parcels have been annexed to the District as they have developed. Reference is also made.to the Assessment Diagram included in this Report. Description of Improvements and Services The improvements are the maintenance and servicing of landscaping sites and appurtenant facilities throughout the District. The various landscaping sites that are maintained consist of parkways, median islands, street trees, paseos and community trails located within street right-of-ways and dedicated public easements which are within the boundaries of the District. The landscaping maintenance includes, but is not limited to, shrubs, turf, tree trimming in irrigated City parkways and paseos, weed and pest control, landscape irrigation systems and testing, trash, debris and graffti removal, and associated appurtenant facilities. Services include personnel, materials, contracting services, utilities, and all necessary costs associated with the maintenance, replacement and repair required to keep the improvements in a healthy, vigorous and satisfactory condition. In addition, it is the City's intention to continue to use cost effective materials, including the future ability to replace landscaping with drought resistant or low water use plants, in order to lower expenses of the District. The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows: Parks: Bear Gulch Park, East and West Beryl park, Old Town Park, Church Street Park, Golden Oaks Park, Heritage Community Park, Hermosa Park, Red Hill Community Park, lions Park, Napa Park, Don TiburcioTapia Park, Rancho Cucamonga Adult Sports Complex. Site # Descriptive Location A-1 The north and south side of Wilson from Hellman to Amethyst. Ground Cover area: 22,982 square feet A-2 The east side of Hellman from 326 feet south of Pepperidge to 73 feet north of Pepperidge. Ground Cover area: 5,810 square feet A-3 The south side of 19th Street from 62 feet east of Mayberry to 173 feet east of Mayberry. Ground Cover area: 1,660 square feet A-4 The south side of Wilson from Amethyst to Archibald; the planters and cutouts on the west side of Archibald from Wilson to 105 feet south of Cottonwood. Ground Cover area: 5,625 square feet A-5 The north and south side of Diamond Court from Klusman to Diamond Ave. Ground Cover area: 3,143 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2010/11 P-155 A-6 The parkway on the north side of Wilson from 348 feet east of Morning Canyon to Alder Ridge. Ground Cover area: 5,700 square feet A-7 The cutouts and vines on the south side of Wilson from the Alta Loma Channel to 240 feet east of Zapata. Ground Cover area: 911 square feet A-8 The east side of Broken Star from 80' south of Highland to Highland; the north side of Highland from Amethyst to Broken Star including wood chip area north of sidewalk, the south side of Highland from Broken Star to Amethyst; the west side of Amethyst from 140 feet south of Highland to 265 feet south of Highland. Ground Cover area: 16,870 square feet A-9 The south side of Highland from Hellman to Broken Star. Ground Cover area: 7,865 square feet A-10 The south side of 19th from 170 feet west of Pilgrim to 167 feet east of Pilgrim. Ground Cover area: 1,808 square feet A-11 The east side of Amethyst from Lemon to 230 feet north of Apricot Ground Cover area: 2,115 square feet A-12 The west side of Sapphire from 710 feet north of Hillside to Hillside. Ground Cover area: 4,500 square feet A-13 The south side of Victoria from 110 feet west of London to Ramona. Ground Cover area: 2,705 square feet A-14 The west side of Archibald from 273 feet north of La Gloria to Lemon; the La Gloria median from Archibald to Jadeite; the north and south side of La Gloria from Archibald to 53 feet east of Jadeite; the north side of Lemon from Archibald to 55 feet east of Klusman. Ground Cover area: 12,880 square feet A-15 The planters and cutouts on the east side of Archibald from 610 feet south of Cottonwood to Wilson; the south side of Wilson from Archibald to Alta Loma Channel. Ground Cover area: 2,110 square feet A-16 The cutouts and planters on the east side of Archibald from Banyan to 190 feet north of Sunflower. Ground Cover area: 1,580 square feet A-17 The cutouts and planters on the west side of Archibald from 225 feet south of Wilson to Banyan. Ground Cover area: 2,362 square feet A-18 The cutouts and planters on the north side of Banyan from Jadeite to 410 feet west of Jadeite. Ground Cover area: 216 square feet A-19 The cutouts and planters on the east side of Amethyst from 192 feet south of Sunflower to Manzanita. Ground Cover area: 4,325 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 6 Fiscal Year 2010/11 P-156 A-20 The west side of Archibald from 210 feet north of La Colina to 230 feet south of Almond; the south side of La Colina from Archibald to Jadeite. Ground Cover area: 17,120 square feet A-21 The planter adjacent to the equestrian trail from Riverwood to Raspberry north of the County flood retention basin that is west of Chaffey College. Ground Cover area: 22,832 square feet A-22 The west side of Haven from Carrari to Vista Grove. Ground Cover area: 4,572 square feet A-23 The west side of Haven from 434 feet north of Manzanita to 258 feet south of Manzanita. Ground Cover area: 48,390 square feet Turf area: 5,868 square feet A-24 The south side of 19th from 286 feet east of Amethyst to 166 feet west of Klusman. Ground Cover area: 5,904 square feet A-25 The equestrian trail and planters on the east side of Hermosa from 421 feet south of Whispering Forest to Sun Valley. Ground Cover area: 17,529 square feet A-26 The west side of Haven from 630 feet north of Wilson to Wilson; the parkway on the north side of Wilson from Haven to Mayberry; the parkway on the east side of Mayberry frcm Wilson to 382 feet north of Poplar, and the east and west side of Camilla from Wilson to Poplar. Ground Cover area: 35,540 square feet A-27 The north side of 19th from Mayberry to 93 feet east of Castle Gate. Ground Cover area: 5,145 square feet A-28 The east side of Hermosa from 360 feet south of Manzanita to Manzanita, and the south side of Manzanita from Hermosa to Raspberry. Ground Cover area: 7,421 square feet A-29 The south side of Wilson from 240 feet west of Timbermist to Hermosa; the west side of Hermosa from Wilson to 213 feet south of Oak Grove. Ground Cover area: 11,184 square feet A-30 The equestrian trail and plant material from the curb to the tract wall on the west side of Hermosa from 118 feet south of Hillside to 160 feet south of Waterford. Ground Cover area: 12,132 square feet A-31 The south side of Lemon from London to Calle Hermosa. Ground Cover area: 4,404 square feet A-32 The north side of Lemon from the Alta Loma Channel to London; the east side of London from Lemon to Cypress. Ground Cover area: 4,463 square feet A-33 The parkway on the east side of London from 158 feet north of Banyan to 310 feet north of Banyan. Ground Cover area: 1,029 square feet A-34 The south side of Alta Loma from Mayberry to Revere. Ground Cover area: 2,772 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2010/11 P-7 57 Note: 1,512 square feet of ground cover deleted from this site on 7-00. A-35 The west side of Hermosa from Lemon to 125 feet north of Highland, the parkway on the south side of Lemon from 621 feet west of Hermosa to Hermosa. Ground Cover area: 10,494 square feet A-36 The south side of Lemon from 365 feet west of Mayberry to Cartilla. Ground Cover area: 4,850 square feet A-37 The south side of Hillside north and south of the equestrian Vail from Beryl to 203 feet east of Eastwood. Ground Cover area: 4,900 square feet A-36 The median in the 9200 block of Monte Vista Ground Cover area: 500 square feet A-39 The south side of Almond from Henry to Sapphire; the west side of Sapphire from Almond to 255 feet south of Bella Vista. Ground Cover area: 6,926 square feet A-40 The parkway an the east side of Jasper from Hunter to Highland; the parkway on the south side of Highland from Jasper to Carnelian; the west side of Carnelian from Highland to 210 feet south of Highland. Ground Cover area: 14,858 square feet A-41 The west side of Sapphire from 236 feet north of Thoroughbred to Banyan. Ground Cover area: 2,656 square feet A-42 The parkway on the west side of Beryl from 132 feet north of Sunflower to 23 feet north of Sunflower; and from Sunflower to Banyan. Ground Cover area: 4,735 square feet A-43 The north side of Base Line from Topaz to the Cucamonga Creek Channel. Ground Cover area: 4,563 square feet A-44 The cutouts on the west side of Sapphire from Banyan to Marble. Ground Cover area: 7,300 square feet A-45 The mainline for this site was connected to A-46 9-B-99. A~6 The south side of Banyan from North star to Zircon. Ground Cover area: 7,448 square feet A-47 The cutouts and vines on the north side of Banyan from 180 feet east of Zircon to 186 feet west of Vineyard. Ground Cover area: 1,300 square feet A-48 The parkway on the west side of Beryl from 452 feet north of Cielito; 158 feet south of Cielito and the easement between 9063 and 9073 Cielito from Cielito to 170 feet south of Cielito. Ground Cover area: 6,916 square feet A-49 The east side of Camelian from 662 feet south of Banyan to Banyan; the south side of Banyan from Carnelian to Northstar. Ground Cover area: 5,906 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 8 Fiscal Year 2010/11 P-158 A-50 The north side of Almond from Sapphire to Crest View; the east and west side of Skyline from Almond to 595 feet north of Almond. Ground Cover area: 17,600 square feet A-51 The planter adjacent to the equestrian trail; from Haven to Rivenvood, north of County flood retention basin, west of Chaffey College. The west side of Haven from 400 feet north of Amber To 270 feet south of Amber. Ground Cover area: 37,977 square feet A-52 The east side of Riverwood, from 188 feet south of Charwood to 193 feet north of Chanvood. Ground Cover area: 2,750 square feet A-53 The west side of Jasper from Hunter to Highland. The south side of Highland from Jasper to 308 feet west of Sard. The east and westside of Sard from Highland to Hunter. Ground Cover area: 7,445 square feet A-54 The west side of Beryl from 233 feet north of Mignonette to Mignonette. Ground Cover area: 2,637 square feetJune 23, 2010 A-55 The north side of 19'" from Cartilla to Mayberry. The east side of Mayberry from 19`" to Heather. Ground Cover area: 8,410 square feet A-56 The east side of Beryl from 410 feet north of Wilson to Wilson The north side of Wilson from Beryl to 731 feet west of Buckthorn. The south side of Wilson from Buckthorn to Beryl. Ground Cover area: 19,708 square feet A-57 The east side of Hermosa From 115 north of Coca To 451 feet north of Coca. The trail north of water retention basin from Hermosa to 619 feet east of Hermosa. Ground Cover area: 9,406 square feet A-58 The west side of Haven from 510 feet south of Victoria to 1005 feet south of Victoria. Ground Cover area: 7,301 square feet A-59 The east side of Archibald from 820 feet south of Lemon to 448 feet south of Lemon and continues from 275 feet south of Lemon to 185 feet south of Lemon. Ground Cover area: 4,777 square feet A-60 The south side of Lemon from 290 feet east of Archibald to London. The West side of London from Lemon to Orange. Ground Cover area: 2,569 square feet A-61 The north side of Carrari from Archibald to London. Ground Cover area: 25,152 square feet A-62 The east side of Archibald from Carrari to 505 feet north of Meadowood. Ground Cover area: 8,626 square feet. A-63 The south side of Almond street from Carriage to Almond Ground Cover area: 3,342 square feet. Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2010111 P-159 A-64 The east side of Beryl from Cottonwood to Wilson. The south side of Wilson from Beryl to 437 feet east of Beryl. The north side of Wilson from Cousins to 474 feet east of Cousins. Ground Cover area: 11,973 square feet. A-65 The east side of Archibald from LaGloria to 328 feet north of LaGloria. Ground Cover area: 2,279 Square feet. A-66 The east side of Hermosa from Waterford to 500 feet north of Waterford. Ground Cover area: 4,695 Square feet. A-67 The south side of 19'" from 220 feet east of Sapphire to Via Serena, Ground Cover area: 3,208 Square feet. A-68 The west side of Haven from Hillside to 783 feet south of Hillside. Ground cover area: 3,492 square feet Hardscape area: 0 square feet A-69 The north side of Hillside from 27 feet west of Mayberry to 191 feet west of Mayberry. Ground Cover area: 1,002 square feet A-70 The south side of 19r" from 365 feet west of Amethyst to Amethyst, The west side of Amethyst from 19'" to Hedges. Ground Cover area: 6,435 square feet A-72 The south side of Banyan from 420 feet west of Archibald to Archibald. The west side of Archibald from Banyan to 389 feet south of Banyan. Ground cover area: 10,270 square feet Hardscape area: 6,673 square feet A-73 The west side of Beryl from 300 feet north of San Simeon Drive to 130 feet north of San Simeon Drive. Ground Cover area: .1,200 square feet A-74 The south side of Highland Ave. from Beryl St. to Hellman Ave. Ground cover area: 11,603 square feet Hardscape area: 0 square feet A-75 The south side of Highland Ave. from Amethyst St. to 612 feet east of Archibald Ave. Ground cover area: 106,409 square feet Hardscape area: 60,608 square feet B-1 The median on Blue Gum from Etiwanda to Blue Gum Court. Ground Cover area: 5,100 square feet B-2 The north side of 19th from Highland to Palm; the west and east side of Alameda from 19th to Ring; the east side of Palm from 19th to Ring. Ground Cover area: 22,550 square feet B-3 The paseo from Sutter Ct. to Deer Creek Channel. Ground Cover area: 294 square feet B-4 The north side of Banyan from Deer Creek Channel to 355 feet west of Fredericksburg. Ground Cover area: 9,200 square feet B-5 The north side of Lemon from Semillion to 188 feet west of Terracing. Ground Cover area: 14,472 square feet landscape Maintenance District No. 1 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 10 Fiscal Year 2010111 P-160 B-6 The north side of Lemon from Barsac to Semillion. Ground Cover area: 15,784 square feet B-7 The south side of Banyan from Cabernet to 414 feet east of Cabernet. Ground Cover area: 18,814 square feet B-8 The south side of Banyan from Callaway to Muscat. Ground Cover area: 10,505 square feet B-9 The east side of Haven from Banyan to 240 feet north of Banyan; the north side of Banyan from Haven to Merlot. Ground Cover area: 24,975 square feet B-10 The east side of Haven from 400 feet south of Banyan to Banyan; the south side of Banyan from Haven to Callaway. Ground Cover area: 14,548 square feet B-11 The south side of Banyan from Muscat to Cabemet. Ground Cover area: 33,282 square feet B-92 The north side of Lemon from Barsac to 135 feet east of Valinda. Ground Cover area: 13,464 square feet B-13 The south side of 19th from Inyo to 585 feet east of San Benito; the parkways on the east and west side of San Benito from 19th to San Mateo; the east side of Inyo from 19th to paseo south of 19th and the paseo running east from Inyo to Sonora. Ground Cover area: 17,563 square feet Turf area: 3,387 square feet B-14 The paseo from San Benito and Sonora to the Deer Creek Channel. Ground Cover area: 2,000 square feet B-15 The paseo from Stanislaus and Lavine to the Deer Creek Channel. Ground Cover area: 1,040 square feet B-16 The paseo from Inyo to Mendocino. Ground Cover area: 225 square feet B-17 The paseo from Yuba Ct. to Deer Creek Channel. Ground Cover area: 918 square feet B-18 The south side of Wilson from 377 feet west of Canistel to 1032 feet east of Canistel. Ground Cover area: 6,762 square feet B-19 The east side of Haven from the Southern Pacific Railroad to 341 feet south of Victoria. Ground Cover area: 6,415 square feet B-20 The east side of Haven from 341 feet south of Victoria to Victoria; the south side of Uctoria from Haven to 237 feet east of Mango. Ground Cover area: 16,900 square feet B-21 The south side of 19th from Valinda to Inyo. Ground Cover area: 3,900 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 11 Fiscal Year 2010/11 P-161 B-22 The south side of Lemon south of the sidewalk from 188 feet west of Terracina to 284 feet north of Marbella. The parkway on the south side of Lemon from 188 feet west of Terracina to 517 feet north of Marbella. The turf in the parkway at the end of the cul-de- sac on Sonterra Court. The parkway on the north side Lemon from 188 feet west of Terracina to 526 feet south of Terracina. The northside of Lemon north of the sidewalk from 188 feet west of Terracina to 562 feet south of Tercacina. The turf in the parkway at the end of the cul-de-sac at Serena Street. Ground Cover area: 17,688 square feet. Turf Area: 6,390 square feet. B-23 The parkway on the east side of Lemon from 129 feet south of Marbella to 526 feet south of Terracina. The slope On the east side of Lemon east of the sidewalk from 129 feet south of Marbella to 562 feet south of Terracina. The west side of Lemon west of the sidewalk from 284 feet north of Marbella to 129 feet south of Marbella. The parkway on the west side of Lemon from 517 feet north of Marbella to 129 feet south of Marbella. Ground Cover area: 22,531 square feet. Note: There was 11,844 square feet of ground cover deleted from this site 7-1-00. B-24 The south side of Highland from 327 feet west Deer Creek Channel to Deer Creek Channel. The paseo from Los Osos to Deer Creek Channel. Ground Cover area: 4,946 square feet. B-25 The south side of Banyan from 152 feet west of Cantabria to 930 feet east of Cantabria. Ground Cover area: 16,693 square feet. B-26 The north side of Wilson from 590 feet west of High Meadow Place to 187 feet east of High Meadow Place. Ground Cover area: 4,628 Square feet B-27 The east side of Haven from 467 feet north of 19th St. to 650 feet north of 19th St. Ground cover area: 3,483 square feet Hardscape area: 6,235 square feet C-1 The north side of 26th from Andover to Hermosa; the east side of Hermosa from 26th to 331 feet north of Concord. Ground Cover area: 12,804 square feet Turf area: 9,423 square feet C-2 The entry monument on the north east and northwest corners of 4th and Archibald. Ground Cover area: 5,860 square feet Turf area: 5,546 square feet C-3 The south side of Base Line from Ramona to 128 feet east of Cambridge. Ground Cover area: 17,262 square feet Cll The south side of Base Line from 440 feet west of Ramona to Ramona. Ground Cover area: 6,198 square feet C-5 The south side of Base Line from 340 feet west of Center to 103 feet east of Center. Ground Cover area: 8,850 square feet C-6 The south side of Base Line from Ivy to 105 feet west of Marine. Ground Cover area: 8,080 square feet C-7 The parkway on the north side of Church from 142 feet east of Teak to 230 feet west of Teak. Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 12 Fiscal Year 2010!11 P-162 Ground Cover area: 1,813 square feet C-8 The west side of.Hermosa from 524 feet north of Palo Alto to 142 feet south of Palo Alto. Ground Cover area: 2,650 square feet C-9 The parkway on the west side of Hermosa from 163 feet north of Ironwood to 145 feet south of Ironwood. Ground Cover area: 1,500 square feet C-10 The entry monument parkway on the south side of Base Line from the western city limit to Alta Cuesta. Ground Cover area: 9,756 square feet C-11 The parkway on the east side of Beryl from Alder to 135 feet north of Culpepper. Ground Cover area: 3,400 square feet C-12 The parkway on the east side of Hellman from Tryon to 665 feet north of Tryon. Ground Cover area: 8,280 square feet C-13 The parkway on the west side of Hellman from 500 feet north of Church to Church. Ground Cover area: 2,416 square feet C-14 The east side of Archibald from 196 feet north of Palo Alto to 530 feet north of Palo Alto. Ground Cover area: 4,262 square feet C-15 The north side of San Bernardino from Summerlin to 225' west of Summerin. Ground Cover area: 1,660 square feet C-16 The south side of Base Line from 286 feet west of Hermosa to Hermosa. The raised planter on the southwest corner of Base Line and Hermosa. Ground Cover area: 4,190 square feet C-17 The east side of Hellman from 775 feet south of 6th St. to 6th St. The south side of 6th St. from Hellman to Golden Oak Rd. The west side of Golden Oak Rd. from 6th St. to Foxbrook Dr. Ground cover area: 9,058 square feet Hardscape area: 6,387 square Feet D-1 The east side of Rochester from Church to Base Line. Ground Cover area: 11,126 square feet Turf area: 16,794 square feet D-2 The east side of Rochester from 146 feet south of Chervil to Church St. Ground Cover area: 11,908 square feet Turf area: 9,950 square feet Ground cover, shrubs and turf areas that make up parkways, median islands and paseos are maintained under contract by a private landscape maintenance company. Parks are maintained by the City's Park Maintenance Crews. Map of Improvements The following page shows the map of landscaping improvements, including irrigation sites and . community trails, to be maintained using District funds. Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 13 Fiscal Year 2010/11 ® ~~ 0 U E % J ~ F- ~ ~ J O O op o w w- ~ z w~ w \ ~ J ~ Z ~ Z ~ O ? ~' (n ry -___ f ~I i IF ~ I U U U O Q Q p sJ J }ate K a O __~ ~JI F ( - 7-i--""i - -_- ~J ~ ~ Z ~ U_' 07 F ~ ~tj O ya m ~ 1Fdf #~i~ ~ ~i~\, [Y A W W LC ~ 1- L` ~ -141~^~ ~fi~ - ~ U fl Ll LL ~ U U 'I `+..JI'~ I I w tii I I F4` ..... r~~ 'i~~ r I Y ,~.a;-- ~ I ! ~ I i I ~pf ~~ i ~~"~i_- I . i _J- i ,- L ~_ ~ I_ L_ 1LI.~.. ~ ~ ~ ..~. j I 1. ,I~ ~I ;~y, ~ I~ ~ ~~ ~;_ T ~#__ D hT> I I s 1~,,. YeA .11L.~..~GGa.~ ~ ~ ~ I r I }~" tt I I 1 ,.~ $~. ~ 4 ~° ~~ I i -'- _ p .....o ~ ~ I Itt 117 0 ~- ~i+ ~ I G lil ~.'~ V t .~ Ipl.3a ; 6 _ I I (`-] -t i ~r --_ L ~ ~ CI ~ I n7M`aci r ~ Y~vl~"~ .' I YR ~~ r ~I~~1 E~ i. _ L __ n _ H Q I I''i'~°'I ~ ...,.. I s ~mvxs~Ok ~ R ,~ + i ~jn_ ~'[-. II .w t6 ~ ~ w I L C ji ~. __-~ y, ; ''Srf ~ ~r F i ~3 ~ r jf J_. ®.m.. x, r ~ I ~ »,r f6 N~ ~ ~ I E{ w ~~ J 1 j ~ ~ I ~. ~ 1~ 4-c~~.~ t'~I -t I z - y ~~ ~,{ 2' .r't. C~ I _ 11 b I H .r ~eaa C O .. ~ LT t~~ n ~, 1~~4 4~.. 5/s~ ~~ ._ W ~ ~Jµ'~ ~.LL r* L ~`.~ l s.. 'OIfF[I I [Ti'YP i~e9 ~ Jr °~ rjy,,p4.b I ;~ ,~ ~ f I 1 3~ r a r r ~ I "u°In'1 ~' yNm m~ryyyIM1 H-'t ~ \ QI; }y Y k HCm~ mtl ~'y t `tw Iti r ~ fl. ~ ~-~ I ~~ Isr 'R Cr ~'~' ~'"~ .^.°.° ~~Y fmrv1~Rm 0 -~.g }'~i ~fi ~ ~ I"~~~ ~~ ~''- {C _.___.__?, a'.. ~ i f < ¢, dmrc' ~y m'.~,r m m s .r. .1..1, IM 4.f - f y Ii 1 1 I jam. I .. ~.x V (_. I ~ yj~{y I ~.. r}n ~,° m m `¢i k' "'gym 5..-°~.. ~ 'y( e ~ - s' ~ ,l"l (l~Y~ r l~°-I r tV~ _a ~{ N I'~ 3 )I ~W !Id l F 'l'-r ~~ C Z+'d's~3~~1 ~~ ~Il ~~ ~ I 7 ~4 iv~a~ a m{H ;a r°gl2 -~I r+'I ~~ Ia I ;oa 4~,.z~ -a _ +k.g 8 ~ M7& rl ~~?~ _ C I ~ ~ in';a` 4 ~ ala r a c (4-M'"INj Q'q cM1iQ ,may `U ~'°,.~ '-°ii~rl~ t F ~~: ; ,,gu lC -~ : } ly I m r.} N3 a~ T m '3 tJ,~~ !-~ wR4 #°~, ~ ..,.~... J I. Q „ j I ~ -=~memi~ ~ .h a '~q Irt~ „{' ~1E i?kiOJ~U i ~ I I I ~7 I 1 ~ ~"~'. . I _.. ~I _~iv':-M1 bbl C°~ b .{ I c hS~n+h~*J , ~~ t~ b'eI ab n -~' 1 Zvi .xU x ~~iY nyc~~G -+~ ~~~V I ~--~~ ,. 1 -aa4r s~a~nx1 .a a s `s~~ytl u I I 1~_~ I I ~ h`i ~ Y. ~' s ~ b ~~~ • ~V P{ 1 +~ Z r 3 ., .y ~. I E ~ enewro I y I y{f,+a r r~ w m'0"nN„,e2 ¢ y a~.51 -~ t ' f ~ ~ijF}~Pq ~'rg,~",e.m jf ~ ,~ ;`v I~t'~}'rg I -~~ s ~n di'6 bmv • 'x~il "~ i v'~'y ~1 ~IF§LR.1 '~ fl , iz Pty1 n a } a U a411^ NY.{N ~ "'(' &t ~ ~^ I l ~ ~VIl~~'. ~~ j~ f ~ ~:II v r Gi'~~i~fy-rm -Qt~,.,.afr'}"-_lyy ~f'~3 r~V~ G~rkt3 ~ Ste" m'7 y ..,r... I I ~ ,~ r ~ a I~~1 it ~~i~ .~".- I y ~.i~F-z^e ~1~~ :`pct y~U~ ~I ~inA ~k;,,:~' ~~ ~ - ~ - 5 I Ir a r ~ s a .,r °n Qr m 'R~'~r. ~ U~ ~ L f ~ `tea ~~.ts ~ r ~~ ~~ds~ r, Q £~~T ~-r a x $rl~ ~ Wra ~,a~:~< ,~] -., ~~~I ilk ~~ ~ y~=J is<~ a tiere~~fla<¢ ~~- ~ III ..w.. I 1..~1 SS I }'v~h ~N` a ~ ~ { ':V~Y~ L+ use n~k21 ~ ~ -~-". I r j r. "~._ I f9~1 I u th ,ux W .. ~ ~ AZ r 1 1 III F ~ i'. r Y o „3~. ~~ ~..._== r ~;€if tl jf ~ ("SCI ?C! I;;jl? ~< ,ih 'ij4,1 P-164 ESTIMATE OF COSTS The estimated costs of administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing the improvements as described in the Plans and Specifications are summarized below. Each year, as part of the assessment district levy calculation process, the costs and expenses are reviewed and the annual costs are projected for the following fiscal year. District Estimated 2010111 Bud et Personnel Services Regular Payroll $87,900.00 Part-time Salaries 22,400.00 Fringe Benefits 43.770.00 Subtotal Personnel $154,070.00 Operations and Maintenance Operations and Maintenance $68,850.00 O & M Facilities 11,500.00 Vehicle Operations and Maintenance 2,000.00 Equipment Operations and Maintenance 3,800.00 Depreciation of Computer Equipment 440.00 Contrail Services 663,500.00 Tree Maintenance 63,260.00 Utilities Telephone Utilties 3,330.00 Water Utilities 268,720.00 Electric Utilities 60,040.00 Assessment Administration 64,830.00 General Overhead 81.160.00 Subtotal Operations and Maintenance $1,291,430.00 Capital Expenditures Capital Pmiects ` Subtotal Capital Expenditures $0.00 Total Expenditure Budget $1,445,500.00 Total Estlmated Assessment $1,189,642.70 Less Anticipated Delinquencies (56.722.7D1 Total Estimated Revenue $1,132,920.00 Plus Operating Reserve Fund Contribution 312.580.00 Total Expenditure Budget $1,445,500.00 Total Estimated Assessment $1,189,642.70 Total District EDU Count 12,901.45 Actual Assessment per EDU -Fiscal Year 2010/11 $92.21 M ximum Allow ble A se sm r U - Fis I Year 20 2.21 Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 14 Fiscal Year 2010/11 P-165 The maximum allowable assessment per EDU listed in the District budget above, is the amount which was approved in 1996/97 and subsequent District annexations. Each year, prior to the assessments being placed on the tax roll, the City will review the budget and determine the amount needed to maintain the improvements for the upcoming fiscal year. The actual assessment per EDU will be based on the estimated costs of maintenance, available fund balance and maximum allowable assessment with the goal of maintaining the improvements in a satisfactory and healthy condition. The actual assessment amount may be lower than the maximum allowable assessment; however it may not exceed the maximum unless the increase is approved by the property owners in accordance with Proposition 218. It is the intent of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to maintain an Operating Reserve which shall not exceed the estimated costs of maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or when the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The reserve balance information for the District is as follows: Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2010 Reserve Fund Balance $674,649.50 Operating Reserve Contribution -Fiscal Year 2010/11 (312,580.00) Operating Reserve Collection -Fiscal Year 2010/11 0.00 I Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2011 Reserve Fund Balance $362,069.50 ~~. Definitions of Budget /ferns The following definitions describe the costs and expenses included in the District Budget Personnel Services Reoutar Salaries: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all full-time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Part Time Salaries: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all part time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Frinoe Benefits: This item includes the benefits available to City employees: health care, vacation, sick time, and retirement fund. Operations and Maintenance Contract Services: This item includes the contract costs of a landscape maintenance company responsible for the ongoing maintenance of the District improvements. Tree Maintenance: This item includes the contract costs attributed to maintaining the street trees and other trees throughout the District. Utilities -Water: This item includes the costs to furnish water for the landscaping within the District. Utilities -Electric: This item includes the costs to furnish electricity required for the operation and maintenance of the sprinklers and irrigation controllers. Assessment Administration: This item includes the cost to all particular departments and staff of the City, and consultants for providing the administration, coordination and management of District services, operations, and incidental expenses related to the District. This item also includes creation of an annual engineer's report, resolutions and placing the assessment amounts onto the County tax Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 15 Fiscal Year 2010!11 P-166 roll each year, along with responding to any public inquiries and tuture Proposition 218 balloting proceedings. General Overhead: This item includes the costs of all departments and staff of the City for providing the coordination of District services, inspections, annual bid management, responding to public concerns, public education, accounting, auditing and procedural matters associated with the District. This item also includes an allocation for general City staff time for administrative functions and systems that provide for a functional and operational assessment district within the City's administrative structure. Capital Expenditures: Capital Projects: This item includes new improvements to further enhance the level and quality of service provided within the boundaries of the District. This may include new monuments, irrigation systems, and other Large improvements. Operating Reserve Collection: Ooeratino Reserve Collection: This item ircludes the amount to be collected to maintain reserves to enable the City to pay for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or whenever the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The Reserve Fund contribution will continue until such a time the Reserve Fund balance is approximately one half of the annual costs. The fund may be allowed to accumulate in anticipation of any unforeseen expenses not included in the yearly maintenance costs. This may include, but is not limited to, tree replacements, repair of damaged equipment due to vandalism, storms and other similar events. Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 16 Fiscal Year 2010/11 P-167 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT General Pursuant to the 1972 Act and Article XIII D, all parcels that have a special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements and services shall be identified, and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel shall be determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of improvements. The 1972 Act, permits the establishment of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include the operation, maintenance and servicing of landscaping improvements. Section 22573 of the 1972 Act requires that maintenance assessments must be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. This Section states: "The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district maybe apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by each such lof or parcel from the improvements." The determination of whether or not a lot or parcel will benefit from the improvements shall be made pursuant to the Improvement Act of 1911 (Division 7 (commencing with Section 5000) (of the Sfreets and Highways Code, Sfate of California]." The 1972 Act also permits the designation of zones of benefit within any individual assessment district if "by reasons or variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive different degrees of benefit from the improvement' (Sec. 22547). Article XIII D, Section 4(a) of the California Constitution limits the amount of any assessment to the proportional special benefit conferred on the property. Article XIII D also provides that publicly owned properties must be assessed unless there is clear and convincing evidence that those properties receive no special benefit from the assessment. Exempted from the assessment would be the areas of public streets, public avenues, public lanes, public roads, public drives, public courts, public alleys, public easements and rights-of-ways, public greenbelts and public parkways. The net amount to be assessed may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels. Proposition 218, approved by the voters in November 1996, requires the City to separate general benefit from special benefit, where only special benefit is assessed. Special Benefit The maintenance and servicing of the improvements within the District (which are described in the Description of Services and Improvements Section of this report) are for the benefit of the properties. within the District, and as such confer a special and direct benefit to parcels within the District by: • improving the livability, appearance, and desirability for properties within the boundaries of the District, and • ensuring that improvements do not reach a state of deterioration or disrepair so as to be materially detrimental to properties within the District, and Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 17 Fiscal Year 2010!11 P-168 • providing beautification, shade and overall enhancement to properties within the District. The above mentioned items affect the assessed property in a way that is particular and distinct from their effect on other parcels and that real property in general and the public at large do not share. They contribute to a specific enhancement of the properties within the District. Since these improvements, including the community trails, were installed and are maintained specifically for the properties within the District; only properties within the District receive a special benefit and are assessed for said maintenance. General Benefit In addition to the special benefits received by parcels within the District, there are derivative general benefits.that are conferred on parcels outside the boundaries of the District which include: the control of dust and insect infestations, and the visual enhancement of the area to persons or vehicles that may travel through the District. However it has been determined that these benefits are derivative and do not provide a direct beneft to parcels outside of the district That are not being assessed. Method of Assessment Each of the parcels within the District is deemed to receive special benefit from the improvements. Each parcel that has a special benefit conferred upon it as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements are identified and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel is determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of the improvements. When the District was formed in 1979, Article XIII D and Proposition 21 B had not yet been passed. Upon the passage of Article XIII D and the subsequent passage of the Proposition Omnibus Implementation Act, new rules were put into place. Due to the changes in legal requirements, as property annexed to the District after the passage of the Assessment Law, the description of the method of assessment became more refined, however, the assessment per parcel has remained the same since the 1996!97 Fiscal Year. Further, no parcel included in the Distdct formation or annexations prior to when the language was refined, are now being levied differently than they were at the time the District was formed or the parcels were annexed. To assess special benefit appropriately, it is necessary to relate the different type of parcel improvements to each other. The Equivalent Dwelling Unit ("EDU") method of apportionment uses the single family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single family home equals one Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU). Every other land-use is converted to EDUs based on an assessment formula that equates to the property's specific development status, type of development (land-use), and size of the property, as compared to a single family home. Vacant parcels are assigned an EDU value of 0.25 per acre because they receive a lesser benefit from the improvements until such time as development occurs. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land-use types, as assigned by County use code, to determine each parcel's EDU assignment. Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 18 Fiscal Year 2010/11 P-169 Land-Use E uivalent Dwellin Units Pro ert T e Count Use Code EDU Value Multi liar Single Family Residential 1.00 Dwelling Unit Multi-Family Residential 0.50 Dwelling Unit Non-Residential 2.00 Acre The use of the latest County Assessor's Secured Rotl shall be the basis for the Property Type determination and unitslacreage assignments, unless better data is available to the City. In addition, if any parcel within the District is identified by the County Auditor/Controller to be an invalid parcel number for the current fiscal year, the Property Type and EDU assignment shall be based on the correct parcel number and/or new parcel number(s) County use code and subsequent property information. If a single parcel has changed to multiple parcels, the EDU assignment and assessment amount applied to each of the new parcels will be recalculated rather than spread the proportionate share of the original assessment. The following table summarizes the Fiscal Year 2010/11 maximum allowable assessment rates for the District: Property Type (County Use Code) Maximum Allowable Assessment Rate er EDU Actual Assessment Rate er EDU Total UnitslAcres Total EDUs Single Family Residential $92.21 $92.21 7,824.00 7,624.00 Multi-Family Residential 92.21 92.21 10,127.00 5,063.50 Non-Residential 92.27 92.21 6.98 13.95 The total amount of maintenance and incidental costs for maintaining the landscaping and community trail improvements is assessed to the individual parcels of real property within the District in proportion to the special benefit received by such parcels of real property. The proposed individual assessments are shown on the assessment roll in this report. Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 19 Fiscal Year 2010/11 P-170 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM An Assessment Diagram for the District is shown on the following page. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the County Assessor of the County San Bernardino, at the time this report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Engineer's Report. Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 20 Fiscai Year 2010/11 P-171 `1~1 V •~ w .y C ^~ W ~i.~ .C V J ny ua~!II!W ny uaneH ny esow~aH nH PIeQ!4o~V ny uewllaH ~ lg ue!lawe~ N d N N E ¢' ~' o ~ ~ 9 ~ U ~ o a-.... ...... .. ..__.. _.._._....__..__.._ ny ~(~~ay~ y h ^ r L _.._.._.._.._. .~ J ti.. a i ~ a: y N ..... ./ C _ .........__ _ __.{..... J m ... ~ O ~ m t o 3 ~ m ~ ~i Q _. ~ _ ..._.. L..... , \ ny lse3 in t ~- ..__.~_.. ._ .... ................ ......._ i v ny epuenn43i ~ _ ,_...., ny epuen~g3 A J.., ~ .._.._.__ ........ g ~aa1~ fea .... . _. .._..... ~ i..:.:.i._1. ny ~alsayooa i _ - --..__... i_ _......._, ny ~alsayoob i ..~ j ~ `. ;'" ,, ny ua~!II!W ~ ~ N ~ C =_ m 2 Y~ ~~ ~ ,., ny anal l1J ~ CD ~ (~ J W N ~ O W m tl F~f[E2Y ~ge ~F Y;~ffsS` @@'ts' E~~~'~~~~~Epc e°rE a* Y€ ~t~EfSY9i~~~D,~~ ~~~~FEgat~l~g ~~~~X ~44~Sf~ t s 4 is?~c ~€_ ~, Y~~~~ssvExei P-172 ASSESSMENT ROLL Assessment Roll The assessment roll is a listing of the assessment for Fiscal Year 2010/11 apportioned to each lot or parcel, as shown on the last equalized roll of the Assessor of the County of San Bernardino. The following tables summarize the Fiscal Year 2010/11 maximum and actual assessments for the District: Property Type (County Use Code Maximum Allowable Assessment Rate er EDU Total UnitslAcres Total EDUs Maximum Allowable Assessment Single Family Residential $92.21 7,824.00 7,824.00 $721,451.Oa Multi-Family Residential 92.21 10,127.D0 5,063.50 466,905.34 Non-Residential 92.21 6.98 13.95 1,286.32 TOTALS 17,957.98 12,901.45 $1,189,642.70 Property Type (County Use Code Actual Assessment Rate er EDU Total UnitslAcres Total EDUs Actual Assessment Single Family Residential $92.21 7,824.00 7,824.00 $721,451.04 Multi-Family Residential 92.21 10,127.00 5,063.50 466,905.34 Non-Residential 92.21 6.98 13.95 1,286.32 TOTALS 17,957.98 12,901.45 $1,189,642.70 A copy of the full assessment roll is available for review in the City Clerk's office. Annexations The following annexations are effective for the 2010/11 Fiscal Year: Assessor's Parcel Annexation Total Total Property Type Number Date Pro'ect Units/Acres EDUs Coun Use Code 0229-041-10 10/21/2009 DRC2006-00540 225 112.50 Multi-Family Residential Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 - Ciry of Rancho Cucamonga 21 Fiscal Year 2010/11 P-173 Revised Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2010/2011 City of Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 (Victoria Planned Community) P-174 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 (VICTORIA PLANNED COMMUNITY) 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Phone: 909.477.2740 Fax: 909.477.2741 CITY COUNCIL Donald J. Kurth, Mayor L. Dennis Michael, Mayor Pro Tem Rex Gutierrez, Council Member Sam Spagnolo, Council Member Diane Williams, Council Member CITY STAFF John R. Gillison, Assistant City Manager Linda D. Daniels, Deputy City Manager William Wittkopf, Public Works Director Jeff Barnes, Park and Landscape Superintendent Ingrid Y. Bruce, GIS/Special Districts Manager Christopher Bopko, Management Analyst III P-175 TABLE OF CONTENTS ENGINEER'S LETTER INTRODUCTION 1 3 Reason for Assessment .............................................................................................3 Process for Annual Assessment .................................................................................3 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS 5 Description of the Boundaries of the District ...............................................................5 Description of Improvements and Services ................................................................5 Map of Improvements ...............................................................................................15 ESTIMATE OF COSTS 1G District Budget ..........................................................................................................16 Definitions of Budget items .......................................................................................17 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT 19 General .....................................................................................................................19 Special Benefit .........................................................................................................19 General Benefit ........................................................................................................20 Method of Assessment Spread ................................................................................20 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM ASSESSMENT ROLL 23 24 Assessment Roll .......................................................................................................24 Annexations .............................................................................................................. 24 P-176 ENGINEER'S LETTER WHEREAS, on ,the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, under the landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 (the "1972 Act") adopted its Resolution No. _, a Resolution Initiating Proceedings for the Levy of Annual Assessments for Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 (Victoria Planned Community) (the "District"); and WHEREAS, the Resolution Initiating Proceedings directed NBS to prepare and file an Engineers Report for Fiscal Year 2010/11 pursuant to the requirements of the 1972 Act. The Engineer's Report presents the plans and specifications describing the general nature, location and extent of the improvements to be maintained, an estimate of the costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements for the District for the referenced fscal year, a diagram for the District, showing the area and properties proposed to be assessed, and an assessment of the estimated costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing the improvements, assessing the net amount upon all assessable Tots and/or parcels within the District in proportion to the special benefit received; and NOW THEREFORE, the following assessment is proposed to be authorized in order to pay the estimated costs of maintenance, operation and servicing of the improvements to be paid by the assessable real property within the boundaries of the District in proportion to the special benefit received. The following table summarizes the proposed assessment. SUMMARY OF ASSESSMENT Fiscal Year 201 DI11 Total Estimated Assessment $2,960,604.30 Less Anticipated Delinquencies 268 634.30 Total Estimated Revenue $2,691 970.00 Plus Reserve Fund Contribution 601 01 .00 Total Expenditure Budget $3,292,980.00 Total District EDU Count 7,015.65 Actual Assessment per EDU $422.00 Maximum Allowable Assessment per EDU $422.00 In making the assessments contained herein pursuant to the 1972 Act: I have identified all parcels which will have a special benefit conferred upon them from the improvements described in the Special Benefit Section of this Engineer's Repdrt (the "Specially Benefited Parcels"). For particulars as to the ident~cation of said parcels, reference is made to the Assessment Diagram, a copy of which is included in this Engineer's Report. 2. I have evaluated the costs and expenses of the improvements upon the Specially Benefited Parcels. In making such evaluation: Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2010/11 P-177 a. The proportionate special benefit derived by each Specially Benefited Parcel from the improvements was determined in relationship to the entirety of the maintenance costs of the improvements; b. No assessment has been imposed on any Specially Benefited Parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred.on such parcel from the improvements; and c. Any general benefits from the improvements have been separated from the special benefits and only special benefits have been assessed. I, the undersigned, respectfully submit the enclosed Engineer's Report and, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, the Engineer's Report, Assessments, and the Assessment Diagram herein have been prepared and computed in accordance with the order of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Assessment Law. Mark A. Steuer, City Engineer Landscape Maintenance District No. 2-City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2010/11 P-178 INTRODUCTION Reason for Assessment Approval of the assessment covered by this Engineer's Report will generate the revenue necessary to: Provide for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements described in this Engineer's Report. Maintenance may include but is not limited to, all of the following: the repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement, providing for the life, growth, health and beauty of the landscaping, including cultivation, irrigation, trimming, spraying, fertilizing or treating for disease or injury, the removal of trimming, rubbish, debris and other solid waste, the maintenance, repair and replacement as necessary of all irrigation systems and the removal of grafFlti from walls immediately adjacent to the cultivated areas. Servicing means the furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operating and servicing of any improvement. Servicing shall also include vehicle, equipment, capital improvements and administrative costs associated with the annual administration and operation of the District. Process for Annual Assessment The City cannot levy and collect annual assessments within the District without complying with the procedures specified in the 1972 Act. On an annual basis, an Engineer's Report must be prepared which contains a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the district. The City Council must also adopt a resolution of intention which: Declares the intention of the City Council to levy and collect assessments within the assessment district for the fiscal year stated therein. • Generally describes the existing and proposed improvements and any substantial changes proposed to be made in existing improvements. • Refers to the assessment district by its distinctive designation and indicate the general location of the district. Refers to the report of the engineer, on file with the clerk, for a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the district. • Gives notice of the time and place for public hearing by the City Council on the levy of the proposed assessment. • States whether the assessment is proposed to increase from the previous year. If the assessments are to be levied in the same or lesser amounts than the maximum assessment amount approved, the clerk shall give notice by causing the resolution of intention to be published. Any interested person may, prior to the conclusion of the public hearing, file a written protest which shall state all grounds of objection. The protest shall contain a description sufficient to identify the property owned by the property owner filing the protest. During the course or upon conclusion of the hearing, the City Council may order changes in any of the matters provided in the report, including changes in the improvements, any zones within the assessment district, and the proposed diagram or the proposed assessment. The City Council, upon conclusion of the public hearing must then adopt a resolution confirming the diagram and assessment, either as originally proposed or as changed by it. The adoption of the resolution shall constitute the levy of an assessment for the fiscal year referred to in the assessment. Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 - Ciry of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2010111 P-179 If the assessment to be levied exceeds the maximum assessment amount previously approved, the City must comply with the procedures specified in Article XIII D and Proposition 218. The voters in the State of California in November 1996 added Article XIII D to the California Constitution imposing, among other requirements, the necessity for the City to conduct an assessment ballot procedure to enable the owners of each property on which assessments are proposed to be enacted or increased, the opportunity to express their support for, or opposition to the proposed assessment or increase in such assessment. The basic steps of the assessment ballot procedure are outlined below. The City must prepare a Notice of Public Hearing ("Notice'), which describes, along with other mandated information, the reason for the proposed assessments, and to provide a date and time of a public hearing to be held on the matter. The City must also prepare an assessment ballot, which clearly gives the property owner the ability to sign and mark their assessment ballot either in favor of, or in opposition to the proposed assessment. The Notice and assessment ballot are mailed to each affected property owner within the District a minimum of 45 days prior to the public hearing date as shown in the Notice. The City may also hold community meetings with the property owners to discuss the issues facing the District and to answer property owner questions directly. After the Notice and assessment ballot are mailed, property owners are given until the close of the public hearing, stated in the Notice, to return their signed and marked assessment ballot. During the . public hearing, property owners are given the opportunity to address the City Council and ask questions or voice their concerns. At the public hearing, the returned assessment ballots received prior to the close of the public hearing are tabulated, weighted by the proposed assessment amount on each property and the results are announced by the City Council. Article XIII D provides that if, as a result of the assessment ballot proceeding, a majority protest is found to exist, the City Council shall not have the authority to levy and collect the assessments as proposed. A majority protest exists if the assessments represented by ballots submitted in opposition exceed those submitted in favor of the assessment. All returned ballots are tabulated and weighted according to the financial obligation of each particular parcel. If there is no majority protest as described above, the City Council may approve the proposed assessments. If there is a majority protest, as described above, the City will not levy and collect any assessments. Landscape Maintenance District No, 2-City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2010/11 P-180 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS The District provides for the administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing of various improvements located within the public right-of-way and dedicated easements within the boundaries of the District. Description of the Boundaries of the District The District is located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California. The boundaries of the District are generally described as that area of the City known as the Victoria Planned Community which is generally bounded by the 210 Freeway on the north, Etiwanda Avenue on the east, the 15 Freeway on the south east. The western portion of the District is bounded by Base line Road on the South, while the eastern portion of the District is bounded by the 15 Freeway on the South. The western portion of the District is bounded by Hermosa Avenue on the west and the eastern portion of the District is bounded by Rochester Avenue on the west. Typically parcels have been annexed to the District as they have developed. Reference is also made to the Assessment Diagram included in this Report. Description of lmprovemenfs and Services The improvements are the maintenance and servicing of landscaping sites and appurtenant facilities throughout the District. The various landscaping sites that are maintained consist of parkways, median islands, street trees, paseos and community trails located within street right-of-ways and dedicated public easements which are within the boundaries of the District. The landscaping maintenance includes, but is not limited to, shrubs, turt, tree trimming in irrigated City parkways and paseos, weed and pest control, landscape irrigation systems and testing, trash, debris and graffiti removal, and associated appurtenant facilities. Services include personnel, materials, contracting services, utilities, and all necessary costs associated with the maintenance, replacement and repair required to keep the improvements in a healthy, vigorous and satisfactory condition. In addition, it is the City's intention to continue to use cost effective materials, including the future ability to replace landscaping with drought resistant or low water use plants, in order to lower expenses of the District. The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows: Parks: Kenyon Park, Windrows Park, Ellena Park, Vintage Park, Victoria Groves Park and Victoria Arbors Park Site # Descriptive Location 2-1 Arbor Lane from Church to Cul-de-sac at the traffic circle excluding the frontage for Arbor Lane Park. The paseo from the west side of Arbor Lane to Day Creek. The paseo from the west side of Arbor Lane to Saintsbury. The north side of Winery Drive from Arbor Lane to 214 feet west of Arbor Lane. Ground Cover area: 87,985 square feet 2-2 The northwest comer of Day Creek and Church. The north side of Church from Day Creek to 1,152 feet west of Hess. The paseo from the north side of Church to Dry Creek Drive. The paseo from the north side of Church to Pine Ridge Place. The west side of Hess Place from the north side of Church to Dry Creek Drive. The south side of Church from 145 feet east of Hyssop to 896 feet east of Hyssop. Ground Cover area: 24,018 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2010111 P-181 2-3 The west side of Day Creek from Church to 250 feet north of Appellation. The east side of Day Creek from Church to Madrigal. The Day Creek median from Church to Base Line. Ground Cover area: 31,455 square feet 2-4 Victoria Park Lane from Base Line to the east entrance of Arbor Park. The southwest corner of Victoria Park Lane and Base Line. Ground Cover area: 33,589 square feet Turt area: 3,874 square feet 2-5 Victoria Park Lane from the east entrance of Arbor Park to Church. Ground Cover area: 48,743 square feet 2-6 The north side of Church from Arbor Lane to Day Creek. The northwest corner of Church and Arbor Lane. The paseo from the north side of Church to Wilson Creek Drive. Ground Cover area: 18,469 square feet 2-7 The north side of Church from Victoria Park Lane to Arbor Lane. Ground Cover area: 16,609 square feet 2-8 The paseo from the west side of Etiwanda to Silver Rose Court. The north side of Church from Etiwanda to Victoria Park Lane. The east side of Iron Horse Place from Church to Wild Horse Way. The paseo from the north side of Church to Cloudy Bay Court. Ground Cover area: 35,122 square feet VW-1 Base Line median from Victoria Park Lane to 830 feet west of Victoria Park Lane. Ground Cover area: 4,514 square feet VW-2 The north side of Base line, 30D feet east and west of Swanson; the east and west sides of Swanson from Base Line to Province; the paseo from the intersection of Swanson and Province to Atwood with outlet to Dunmore; the paseo from Atwood to the Southern Pacific Railroad; the north side of Saratoga from Powell to Dunmore; the paseo from Saratoga to Etiwanda; the south side of Atwood from Victoria Park Lane to Travis; the north side of Atwood from Walcott to Victoria Park Lane. Ground Cover area: 18,753 square feet Turf area: 73,931 square feet VW-3 The Victoria Park Lane median and the west and east side parkways from Base Line to the entrance to Victoria Village. Ground Cover area: 24,453 square feet Turf area: 2,637 square feet VW-4 The Victoria Park Lane median and the west and east side parkways from Victoria Village entrance to Atwood. Ground Cover area: 30,695 square feet Turf area: 10,242 square feet VW-5 The Victoria Park Lane median and the west side and east side parkways from Atwood to the Southern Pacific Railroad. Ground Cover area: 49,513 square feet VW-6 The paseo running north from 12732 Farrington to the Southern Pacific Railroad. Ground Cover area: 285 square feet VW-7 The paseo running north from 12840 Farrington to the Southern Pacific Railroad. Ground Cover area: 266 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 6 Fiscal Year 2010/11 P-182 VW-8 The Victoria Park Lane median and the west side parkway from the Southern Pacific Railroad to South Victoria Windrows Loop. The Victoria Park Lane east side parkway from the Southern Pac'rfic Railroad to Zinnia Ct. Ground Cover area: 40,548 square feet VW-9 The Victoria Park Lane east side parkway from Barberry to North Victoria Windrows Loop at Windrows Park. Ground Cover area: 9,188 square feet Turf area: 3,851 square feet VW-10 The west side of Victoria Park Lane from South Victoria Windrows Loop to Dahlia Ct.; the Victoria Park Lane median from Zinnia Ct., to Dahlia Ct.; and the east side of Victoria Park Lane from North Victoria Windrows Loop at Windrows Park to Dahlia Ct. Ground Cover area: 27,398 square feet Turf area: 37,350 square feet VW-11 The east side parkway on South Victoria Windrows Loop from Silktassel to Victoria Park Lane; the parkway on the south side of Victoria Park Lane from the intersection of South Victoria Windrows Loop and North Victoria Windrows Loop to Dahlia Ct.; the Victoria Park Lane median from the intersection of North and South Victoria Windrows Loop to Dahlia Ct.; and the parkway on the north side of Victoria Windrows Loop from the intersection of North and South Victoria Windrows Loop to Dahlia Ct. Ground Cover area: 23,082 square feet Turf area: 24,187 square feet VW-12 The Victoria Park Lane median from the intersection of North and South Victoria Windrows Loop west to the tract wall; the parkway on the north side of Victoria Park Lane from the intersection of North and South Victoria Windrows Loop, west to the tract wall; the parkway on the west side of north Victoria Windrows Loop from Silverberry to Victoria Park Lane and; the parkway on the south side of Silverberry from the wall to North Victoria Windrows Loop. Ground Cover area: 149,010 square feet Turf area: 38,842 square feet VW-13 The parkway on the south side of Victoria Park Lane from the west tract wall to South Victoria Windrows loop; and the west side of South Victoria Windrows Loop from Victoria Park Lane to Snapdragon. Ground Cover area: 20,068 square feet Turf area: 16,476 square feet VW-14 The parkway on the west side of South Victoria Windrows Loop from Snapdragon to Victoria Park Lane; the parkway on the north and south side of Sugargum from South Victoria Windrows Loop to the wall; the parkways on the east and west sides of Basswood from Sugargum to Blazing Star; and the parkway on the north side of South Victoria Windrows Loop from Victoria Park Lane to Silktassel. Ground Cover area: 21,466 square feet Turf area: 10,335 square feet VW-15 The parkway on the north side of Bougainvillea Way from Peach to North Victoria Windrows Loop; the parkway on the east side of North Victoria Windrows Loop from Bougainvillea Way and following that curb line to Citrus. The parkway on the north side of North Victoria Windrows Loop from Locust and following that curb line to Silverberry; the parkway on the north side of Silverberry from North Victoria Windrows Loop to the tract wall; the paseo from North Victoria Windrows Loop at Silverberry to Nasturtium; and the paseo from North Victoria Windrows Loop at Locust to Pistachio and continuing to Bougainvillea. Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 -City of Rancho Cucamonga ~ Fiscal Year 2010/11 P-183 Ground Cover area: 45,929 square feet Turf area: 12,207 square feet VW-16 The south side of Highland from 455 feet east Day Creek to 534 feet west of Locust. The east and west side of Locust from Highland to North Victoria Windrows Loop. The parkway on the south side of North Victoria Windrows Loop from Citrus east to Bougainvillea Ct.; the parkway on the north side of North Victoria Windrows Loop from Twinspur to Locust. Ground Cover area: 26,577 square feet Turf area: 23,922 square feet VW-17 This site was modified and added to VW-16, 1-5-99. VW-18 The south side of Highland from 12583 Highland, the Polka Palace to Rockrose. Ground Cover area: 2,800 square feet Turf area: 8,515 square feet VW-19 The north side of North Victoria Windrows Loop from Rosemary to Rockrose; the east side of Rockrose from North Victoria Windrows Loop to Highland; the south side of Highland from Rockrose to Etiwanda; and the horse trail from Highland and Etiwanda to the Fire Station. Ground Cover area: 21,027 square feet Turf area: 32,266 square feet VW-20 The parkway on the south side of North Victoria Windrows Loop from Victoria Park Lane to Plum; the paseo from Tipu east to the open field; and the parkway on the west side of North Victoria Windrows Loop from Plum Way to Rosemary Ct. Note: The area in front of Windrows Park is watered by VW-20 water meter, but is maintained by City crews. Ground Cover area: 2,110 square feet VW-21 The east side of North Victoria Windrows Loop from Rosemary Ct., to the trail south of Kalmia St.; the trail and paseo from North Victoria Windrows Loop south of Kalmia St., to Etiwanda Ave., and north to the Fire Station; and the south side of Basil St., from North Victoria Windrows Loop to Santolina PI. Ground Cover area: 49,187 square feet Turf area: 57,532 square feet VW-22 The paseo from North Victoria Windrows Loop at Rockrose to the north east corner of Windrows Park and from that corner to Plum. Ground Cover area: 13,689 square feet Turf area: 19,953 square feet VW-23 The west side of Rockrose from Highland to North Victoria Windrows Loop; the parkway on the north side of North Victoria Windrows Loop from Rockrose to Twinspur; and the parkway on the south side of North Victoria Windrows Loop from Bougainvillea Ct., to Rosemary. Ground Cover area: 18,299 square feet Turf area: 3,425 square feet VW-24 The M.W.D. easement from Jasmine and Ironbark to Sweet Gum Dr. Ground Cover area: 475 square feet Turf area: 4,730 square feet VW-25 The north side of Baseline from 384 feet west of Wanona to Etiwanda. The west side of Etiwanda from Baseline to Craig. Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2010/11 P-184 Ground Cover area: 20,934 square feet Turf area: 3,079 square feet VW-26 The Paseo from Grape to 630 feet west of Grape. Ground Cover area 7,021 square feet VW-27 The south side of Baseline from 251 feet west of Swanson to Etiwanda. Baseline median from Victoria Park Lane to Swanson Place. Ground Cover area 18,816 square feet This site had 2667 feet of ground cover added from median 6-B-2005. VG-1 The turf and ground cover on the south side of Highland from the Deer Creek Channel to Fairmont; the turf and ground cover from Highland on the west side of Fairmont to Victoria Park Lane; the ground cover on the north side of Victoria Park Lane south of the horse trail; from 475 feet east of Milliken to Fairmont; the turf on the north side of Victoria Park Lane from 275 feet east of Mil! men to Fairmont; the turf in the parkway on the east side of Fairmont from Victoria Park Lane to Highland. Ground Cover area: 21,573 square feet Turf area: 47,604 square feet VG-2 The turf on the east side of York from Delaware to Fairmont; the ground cover on the south side of Fairmont from York Place and continuing on that curb line to Victoria Park lane; the turt and ground cover on the south side of Victoria Park Lane, west of Milliken, from Fairmont to Milliken; the parkway on the west side of Milliken from Victoria Park Lane to Fairmont; the Milliken median from Fairmont to Victoria Park Lane; the turf on the north side of Victoria Park Lane from 273 feet west of Milliken to Milliken; the ground cover on the north side of Victoria Park Lane, south of the horse trail, from 468 feet west of Milliken to Milliken. Ground Cover area: 29,395 square feet Turt area: 73,608 square feet VG-3 The turt and ground cover, north of the sidewalk, on the north side of Fairmont from Nova Ct., and continuing on that curb line to York PI.; and the turf south of the sidewalk on the north side of Fairmont from Armstrong PI., and continuing on that curb line to York PI.; the ground cover on the west side of York PI., from Fairmont to Delaware and the ground cover on the east side of York PI.; the turf and ground cover on the west side of Fairmont from Emerson continuing along that curb line to Armstrong PI.; the turf and ground cover on the east and west sides of Biola PI. Ground Cover area: 57,189 square feet Turf area: 38,343 square feet VG-4 The turf and ground cover on the south side of Fairmont from Armstrong to Milliken; the turf and ground cover on the west side of Milliken from Fairmont to the Southern Pacific Railroad; the Milliken median from Fairmont to the Southern Pacific Railroad; the ground cover on the north side of the Southern Pacific Railroad from Deer Creek Channel to Rochester, including the paseo to Baylor; the ground cover on the north side of Fairmont from Milliken to Nova Ct.; the turf on the north side of Fairmont from Milliken to Armstrong. Ground Cover area: 197,763 square feet Turf area: 24,151 square feet VG-5 The paseo from Biola at Amarillo to Delaware at York. Ground Cover area: 12,448 square feet Turf area: 44,896 square feet VG-6 The paseo beginning at the northeast corner of Victoria Groves park and Fairmont and extending to the Deer Creek Channel. Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 9 Fiscal Year 2010/11 P-7 85 Ground Cover area: 73,442 square feet Turf area: 74,778 square feet VG-7 The paseo that begins on the south side of Donnelly at Fairmont and continues to the Deer Creek Channel including the southward extension on the west side of Albright from Donnelly to Pacific and the paseo from Pacific to Charleston. Ground Cover area: 43,427 square feet Turf area: 51,765 square feet VG-8 The ground cover on the west side of Milliken from 566 feet north of Victoria Park Lane to Victoria Park Lane; the ground cover and turf north of the horse trail on Victoria Park Lane from Milliken to Fairmont; the ground cover on the east side of Fairmont from Victoria Park Lane to 156 feet north of Victoria Park Lane. Ground Cover area: 21,614 square feet Turf area: 8,614 square feet VG-9 The ground cover on the east side of Fairmont from 156 feet north of Victoria Park Lane to Kenyon Way; the ground cover on the south side of Kenyon from Fairmont to 197 feet east of Fairmont; the turf on the south side of Kenyon from Fairmont to 316 feet east of Fairmont; the turf and ground cover on the south side of Baltimore Drive from Fairmont to Baltimore Court; the turf and ground cover on the north side of Baltimore Drive from Fairmont to Vanderbilt; the turf and ground cover on the east side of Vanderbilt from Baltimore to Brown; the paseo from Vanderbilt and Brown to Kenyon. Ground Cover area: 48,481 square feet Turf area: 11,357 square feet VG-10 The ground cover on the south side of Kenyon from 197 feet east of Fairmont to Milliken; the turf on the south side of Kenyon from 316 feet east of Fairmont to Milliken; the ground cover on the west side of Milliken from Kenyon to 566 feet north of Victoria Park Lane; the turf and ground cover on the west side of Captol from Brown to Bethany; the paseo from Capitol and Brown to Kenyon. Ground Cover area: 34,241 square feet Turf area: 11,031 square feet VG-11 Milliken from Baseline to the abandoned railroad. The north side of Baseline from 542 feet east of Milliken to Milliken. This site was reduced on 4-1-2002 by 25,718 sq. ft. of turf and 3,037 sq. ft. of ground cover Ground Cover area: 31,367 square feet Turf area: 17,264 square feet VG-12 The turf and ground cover on the south side of Fairmont from the southeast corner of Milliken and Fairmont along that curb line to Victoria Park Lane; the turf and ground cover on the west side of Fairmont from the southwest corner of Victoria Park Lane and Fairmont (located east of Milliken) and continuing along that curb line to Milliken; the tun on the east side of Milliken from the Southern Pacific Railroad to 730 feet south of Victoria Park Lane; the ground cover on the east side of Milliken from the Southern Pacific Railroad to 766 feet south of Victoria Park Lane. Ground Cover area: 53,068 square feet Turf area: 36,431 square feet VG-13 The paseo from Victoria Park Lane to Verona; from Verona to Napoli and Genova and to Tivoli. Ground Cover area: 17,993 square feet Turf area: 16,344 square feet -Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 10 Fiscal Year 2010/11 P-186 VG-14 Base Line median from Milliken to Ellena East; the turf and ground cover on the north side of Base Line from Ellena East to Ellena West; the turt and ground cover on the east side of Ellena West from Base Line and following that curb line to Kenyon; the north side of Ellena West from Kenyon to Casoli; the turt and ground cover on both sides of Casoli from Ellena West to Candela; the turt and ground cover on both sides of Crema Place from Ellena west to Candela. Ground Cover area: 89,456 square feet Turt area: 62,999 square feet VG-15 The turf and ground cover on the west side of Rochester from the Railroad tracks to Base Line; the turf and ground cover on the north side of Base Line from Rochester to Ellena East; the Base Line Median from Rochester to Ellena East; the turt and ground cover on the east side of Ellena east from Base Line and continuing along that curb line to 275 feet north of Berra Road; the turf and ground cover on both sides of Berra from Ellena East to Comiso. Ground Cover area: 58,588 square feet Turt area: 57,306 square feet VG-16 The paseo from Base Line to Ellena West with entrances to Amelia and Pavola. Ground Cover area: 9,661 square feet Turf area: 11,529 square feet VG-17 The paseo from Fairmont to the Southern Pacific Railroad; the paseo from Fabriano to Martano. Ground Cover area: 35,351 square feet Turf area: 40,291 square feet VG-18 The paseo from Rapallo to Gandino and south to the Southern Pacific Railroad. Ground Cover area: 4,281 square feet VG-19 The paseo from Tolentino to Pizolli and to Tolentino. Ground Cover area: 12,555 square feet Turf area: 17,856 square feet VG-20 The turf on the east side of Milliken from 730 feet south of Victoria Park Lane to Victoria Park Lane; the ground cover on the east side of Milliken from 766 feet south of Victoria Park Lane to Victoria Park Lane; the turt and ground cover on the south side of Victoria Park Lane from the southeast corner at Milliken heading east to Fairmont; the turf and ground cover on the north side of Victoria Park Lane from Parma to the northeast corner of Milliken and Victoria Park Lane; the ground cover on the west side of Parma from Victoria Park Lane median from Milliken to Pandio Ct.; the Milliken median from Victoria Park Lane to 440 feet south of Kenyon; the parkway on the west side of Milliken from 420 feet south of Kenyon to Victoria Park Lane. Ground Cover area: 76,232 square feet Turf area: 97,979 square feet VG-21 The ground cover on the east side of Parma; the ground cover on the north side of Victoria Park Ln., from Parma to 653 feet east of Kenyon; the turt on the north side of Victoria Park Lane from Parma to 653 feet east of Kenyon; the turf on the north side of Victoria Park Lane from Parrna to 547 feet east of Kenyon; the turf and ground cover on the south side of Victoria Park lane from Fairmont to 422 feet east of Kenyon; the turf and ground cover on the east and west sides of Kenyon from Victoria Park Lane to the Southern Pacific Railroad; the paseo from Kenyon to Rapallo; the paseo from Kenyon to Bari; the Victoria Park Lane median from Pandino C[. to Portofino Ct. Ground Cover area: 69,167 square feet Turf area: 58,692 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 11 Fiscal Year 2010/11 P-187 VG-22 The ground cover on the north side of Victoria Park Lane from 653 feet east of Kenyon to Rochester; the turt on the north side of Victoria Park Lane from 547 feet east of Kenyon to Rochester; the Victoria Park Lane median from Portofino Ct., to Rochester Ave.; the turf and ground cover on the south side of Victoria Park Lane (north of sidewalk) from Kenyon to the east side of Vintage Park; the turf and ground cover on the south side of Victoria Park Lane from the east side of Vintage Park to Rochester; the turf and ground cover on the west side of Rochester from Victoria Park Lane to the Southern Pacific Railroad. Ground Cover area: 83,397 square feet Turf area: 89,674 square feet VG-23 The turt and ground cover on the east side of Kenyon from Victoria Park Lane to 409 feet west of Grimaldi; the ground cover on the south side of Portofino from Kenyon to Bergano; the turf and ground cover on the north and south side of Lark from Kenyon to the west side of Rancho Cucamonga High School; the ground cover on the east and west side of Maters from Lark to Pescara; the ground cover on the north and south side of Grimaldi, from Kenyon to Brindisi; the turf and ground cover on the west side of Kenyon from Lark to Victoria Park Lane; the ground cover on the north and south side of Marcello from Kenyon to Landriano. The paseo from southwest corner of Kenyon Park to Kenyon. The paseo from south west corner of Kenyon Park to Kenyon. Ground Cover area: 63,733 square feet Turf area: 82,565 square feet VG-24 The north side of Kenyon from Autumn Glen court to Woodruff. The east side of Woodruff from Kenyon to 403 feet north of Kenyon. Ground Cover area: 8,447 square feet Turf area: 5,320 square feet VG-25 The paseo west of Torino from Kenyon to Highland; the turf and ground cover on the south side of Highland from the northwest corner of Tract 13440 to the east end of Tract 13440. Ground Cover area: 40,800 square feet Turf area: 24,134 square feet VG-26 The paseo from Brindisi Ct., to Messina; the turt and ground cover on the north side of Brindisi Ct., to the end of the cul-de-sac; the turf and ground cover on the west side of Messina from the paseo to Treviso Way. Ground Cover area: 18,905 square feet Turf area: 1,141 square feet VG-27 The Milliken median from 440 feet south of Kenyon to Highland; the parkway on the west side of Milliken from 420 feet south of Kenyon to Kenyon. Ground Cover area: 4,030 square feet Turf area: 3,006 square feet Reduced 1,670 square feet of G.C. on 7-1-00 VG-28 The east side of Rochester from Victoria Park Lane to Highland. Ground Cover area: 60,902 square feet VG-29 The west side of Milliken from Highland Kenyon. The north side of Kenyon from Milliken to Fairmont. The groundcover on the eastside of Fairmont, east of sidewalk, from Kenyon to Highland. The south side of 210 freeway from Kenyon to Milliken from the asphalt to the wall. Ground Cover area: 69,788 square feet Turf area: 16,877 square feet Reduced 18,940 of turf on 7-1-00 Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 12 Fiscal Year 2010/11 P-188 VG-30 The south side of Tresenda from Santo to Sapada. The paseo from Sapada to Carano. The south side of Montella from Carano to Trivento. Ground Cover area: 6,797 square feet Turf area: 2,462 square feet VG-31 The east side of Brienza from Larino to Letini.The west side of Tindari from Letini to Larino. The Greenbelt on the south side of Marconi from Trivento to Comisco. The east side of Comisco from Scalea to Santo. Ground Cover area: 23,419 square feet Turf area: 18,351 square feet VG-32 The north side of Candela from Terini to Bettoloa. Ground Cover area: 20,172 square feet Turf area: 8,190 square feet VG-33 The paseo from the Sapri to Railroad. Ground Cover area: 894 square feet VG-34 The paseo from Bronte to Railroad. Ground Cover area: 894 square feet VG-35 The east side of Rochester from 555 feet south of Palmi to Victoria Park Lane. The south side of Victoria Park Lane and median from Rochester to east side of Deer Creek Channel. Ground Cover area: 53,646 square feet Turf area: 11,150 square feet VG-36 The north side of Victoria Park Lane from the east side of Deer Creek Channel to Rochester. Ground Cover area: 55,780 square feet Turf area : 10,500 square feet VG-37 The paseo at the end of Armadore. Ground Cover area: 1,350 square feet VG-38 The east side of Milliken from 106' feet north of Victoria Park Lane to Kenyon. The north & south of Spring Mist Drive From Milliken to Summerstone. The south side of Kenyon from Milliken to Kenyon Park. Ground Cover area: 28,051 square feet Turf area: 4,533 square feet VG-39 The north side of Victoria Park Lane from Kenyon paseo to 132' east of Milliken. The Kenyon Paseo outlet from Victoria Park Lane to Fairwinds Court: The Paseo from Victoria Park Lane to southwest corner of Kenyon Park. Ground Cover area: 55,089 square feet Turf area: 13,120 square feet VG-40 The south side of Highland from 413 feet west of Highland paseo to Highland paseo. The east side of Highland paseo from Highland to Kenyon. The north side of Kenyon from Highland paseo to Autumn Glen Court. Ground Cover area: 56,553 square feet VG-41 The Westside of Rochester from 294 feet south of Highland to Lark. The north side of Lark From Rochester to 1230 feet west of Rochester. Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 13 Fiscal Year 2010!11 P-189 Ground Cover area: 31,413 square feet VG-42 The south side of Highland from 1314 feet west of Rochester to Rochester. The west side of Rochester from Highland to 294 feet south of Highland. Ground Cover area: 18,464 square feet VG-43 The north side of Victoria Park Lane and the median from Day Creek Blvd. to Day Creek Channel. The east and west sides of Kensington Place from Victoria Park Lane to Stratford Drive. Ground Cover area: 70,669 square feet Turf area: 7,888 square feet VG-44 The west side of Day Creek Blvd. from 572 feet north of Silverberry today Creek Blvd. The south side of Silverberry from Kensington to Day Creek Blvd. Ground Cover area: 36,835 square feet VG-45 The west side of Milliken and the Milliken median from the 210 freeway to Kenyon. Ground Cover area: 10,658 square feet Turf area: 610 square feet VG-46 The Baseline Median from 657 feet east of Virginia Drive to Rochester. The north side of Baseline from 278 feet east of Virginia to Rochester. The outlet at Huntley. The east side of Rochester from Baseline to 105 feet north of Shenandoah. Ground Cover area: 33,135 square feet VG-47 The north side of Baseline from 400 feet east of Day Creek Blvd. to Day Creek Blvd. Baseline median from Day Creek Blvd. to 595 feet east of Day Creek Blvd. This site had an addition 6-8-2004 6,272 square feet of ground cover for median. Ground Cover area: 9,515 square feet. VG-48 The east side of Day Creek Blvd. and median from Baseline to Victoria Park Lane. The south side of Victoria Park Lane from Day Creek Blvd. to 390 feet east of Day Creek Blvd. Ground Cover area: 50,318 square feet Turf Area: 3,234 square feet VG-49 The north side of Victoria Park Lane and median from 390 feet east of Day Creek Blvd to Day Creek Blvd. The east side of Day Creek Blvd from Victoria Park Lane to Highland. The south side of Highland from Day Creek Blvd. to 440 feet east of Day Creek Blvd. Ground Cover area: 51,459 square feet Turf Area: 3,930 square feet VG-50 The west side of San Carmelo from 389 feet north of of Baseline to Baseline. The north side of Baseline from Carmelo to 264 feet west of Dumess. Ground Cover area: 18,043 square feet VG-51 Paseo south of Saxon to Railroad right-of-way. Ground Cover area: 1,398 square feet VG-52 The north side of Sugar Gum from Milliken to Kensington. The south side of Sugar Gum from Milliken to 111 feet east of Suffolk. Ground Cover area: 4,362 square feet VG-53 The south side of Victoria Park Lane from 296 feet west of Kensington to Milliken. The west side of Day Creek Blvd. from Victoria Park Lane [0 397 feet south of Sugar Gum. Ground Cover area: 28,532 square feet Turf Area: 11,070 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 14 Fiscal Year 2010/11 P-190 VG-54 The eastside of Rochester from Shenandoah to the railroad right-of-way. Ground Cover area: 6,684 square feet VG-55 Paseo north of Westhaven to the railroad. Ground Cover area: 1,775 square feet VG-56 The south side of Highland from 1317 feet West of Day Creek to 1085 feet west of Day Creek, including the un-irrigated slope on the south side of the sidewalk. Ground Cover area: 5,274 square feet VG-57 The north side of Highland from Fairmont Way to the Day Creek Channel Ground cover area: 16,157 square feet Ground cover, shrubs and turt areas that make up parkways, median islands and paseos are maintained under contract by a private landscape maintenance company. Parks are maintained by the City's Park Maintenance Crews. .Map of Improvements The following page shows the map of landscaping improvements, including irrigation sites and community trails, to be maintained using District funds. Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 15 Fiscal Year 2010!11 i ~ ' ~i I'I 1 I ~l i *F^YOM1fi!MK3 -. -. - _ `u '".E-~.'fe' m ate' ~ u G a11TOCa:a -.~ ~ ~~~~ ~~ a. N• < 7 ~ N ~NiLUYL' = . ~ J N ~ r i j w _I ,~~ y ~~ C ~ ~)ROKN ~ • t • ~ e { 4 r N _ `. J sElaraa0~ ~ ~,y a~3~3 A~N383 -_. 5 d V _ ~ f N ~ ~ Atl AQM N-- y~~ ~ w ' ~ ~_~c --.._ ~ 1d~3- ~' rFORD Ct' E,STJ,N V _ - , 4 SOS OI'iroS n. ~ _.__ ~ AV 13~JO~M i ,', ~}} i _._...L... ~~% ~,, '~~ ~[~ji,~~~'Fi}~~~ i ~~~. P-7 92 ESTIMATE OF COSTS The estimated costs of administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing the improvements as described in the Plans and Specifications are summarized below. Each year, as part of the assessment district levy calculation process, the costs and expenses are reviewed and the annual casts are projected for the following fiscal year. District Estimated 2010/11 Bud et Personnel Services Re ular Salaries $790,080.00 Overtime Salaries 1 090.00 Part-time Salades 80,320.00 Frin a Benefits 380 180.00 Projected Frin a Benefit Savin s 19,010.00 Pro ected Sala Savin s 40 440.00 Subtotal Personnel $1,192,220.00 O rations and Maintenance 0 erations and Maintenance $64 550.00 O erations and Maintenance Facilities O.OD Vehicle O erations and Maintenance 5,000.00 Contract Services 1,042,450.00 Tree Maintenance 37,350.00 Utilities Tele hone Utilities 1 220.00 Water Utilities 642 600.00 Electric Utilities 88,300.00 Assessment Administration 34 910.00 General Overhead 184 380.00 Subtotal O erations and Maintenance $2 100,780.00 Ca itai Ex enditures Ca ital Pr ~ecis 0.00 Subtotal Ca ital Ex nditures $0.00 Total District Ex enditure Bud et $3,292,980.00 Total Estimated Assessment $2,960 604.30 Less Antici ated Delin uencies 268 634.30 Total Estimated Revenue $2,691,970.00 Plus O eratin Reserve Fund Contribution 601 010.00 Total Ex enditure Bud et $3,292,980.00 Total Estimated Assessment $2,960,604.30 Total District EDU Count 7 015.65 Actual Assessment er EDU -Fiscal Year 2010/11 $422.00 Maximum Allowable Assessment er EDU -Fiscal Year 2010/11 $422.00 Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 16 Fiscal Year 2010!11 P-193 The maximum allowable assessment per EDU listed in the District budget above, is the amount which was approved in 1996/97 and subsequent District annexations. Each year, prior to the assessments being placed on the tax roll, the City will review the budget and determine the amount needed to maintain the improvements for the upcoming fiscal year. The actual assessment per EDU will be based on the estimated costs of maintenance, available fund balance and maximum allowable assessment with the goal of maintaining the improvements in a satisfactory and healthy condition. The actual assessment amount may be lower than the maximum allowable assessment; however it may not exceed the maximum unless the increase is approved by the property owners in accordance with Proposition 218. It is the intent of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to maintain an Operating Reserve which shall not exceed the estimated costs of maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or when the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The reserve balance information for the District is as follows: Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2010 Reserve Fund Balance ~ $1,588,044.07 Operating Reserve Contribution -Fiscal Year 2010/11 (601,010.00) Operating Reserve Collection -Fiscal Year 2010/11 0.00 Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2011 Reserve Fund-Balance $987,034.07 Definitions of Budget Items The following definitions describe the costs and expenses included in the District Budget: Personnel Services Recular Salaries: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all full-time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Part Time Salaries: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all part time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Fringe Benefits: This item includes the benefits available [o City employees: health care, vacation, sick time, and retirement fund. Operations and Maintenance Contract Services: This item includes the contract costs of a landscape maintenance company responsible for the ongoing maintenance of the District improvements. Tree Maintenance: This item includes the contract costs attributed to maintaining the street trees and other trees throughout the District. Utilities -Water: This item includes the costs to furnish water for the landscaping within the District. Utilities -Electric: This item includes the costs to furnish electricity required for the operation and maintenance of the sprinklers and irrigation controllers. Assessment Administration: This item includes the cost to all particular departments and staff of the City, and consultants for providing the administration, coordination and management of District Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 17 Fiscal Year 2010/11 P-194 services, operations, and incidental expenses related to the District. This item also includes creation of an annual engineer's report, resolutions and placing the assessment amounts onto the County tax roll each year, along with responding to any public inquiries and future Proposition 218 balloting proceedings. General Overhead: This item includes the costs of all departments and staff of the City for providing the coordination of District services, inspections, annual bid management, responding to public concerns, public education, accounting, auditing and procedural matters associated with the District. This item also includes an allocatiomfor general City staff time for administrative functions and systems that provide for a functional and operational assessment district within the City's administrative structure. Capital Expenditures: Capital Projects: This item includes new improvements to further enhance the level and quality of service provided within the boundaries of the District. This may include new monuments, irrigation systems, and other large improvements. Operating Reserve Collection: Operating Reserve Collection: This item includes the amount to be collected to maintain reserves to enable the City to pay for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements prier tc December 10 of the fiscal year, or whenever the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The Reserve Fund contribution will continue until such a time the Reserve Fund balance is approximately one half of the annual costs. The fund may be allowed to accumulate in anticipation of any unforeseen expenses not included in the yearly maintenance costs. This may include, but is not limited to, tree replacements, repair of damaged equipment due to vandalism, storms and other similar events. Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 18 Fiscal Year 2010/11 P-195 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT General Pursuant to the 1972 Act and Article XIII D, all parcels that have a special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements and services shall be identified, and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel shall be determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of improvements. The 1972 Act, permits the establishment of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include the operation, maintenance and servicing of landscaping improvements. Section 22573 of the 1972 Act requires that maintenance assessments must be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. This Section states: "The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district maybe apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements." The determination of whether or not a !ot or parcel will benefit from the improvements shall be made pursuant to the Improvement Act of 1911 (Division 7 (commencing with Section 5000) (of the Streets and Highways Code, Stafe of CalifomiaJ." The 1972 Act also permits the designation of zones of benefit within any individual assessment district if "by reasons or variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive different degrees of benefit from the improvement" (Sec. 22547). Article XIII D, Section 4(a} of the California Constitution limits the amount of any assessment to the proportional special benefit conferred on the property. Article XIII D also provides that publicly owned properties must be assessed unless there is clear and convincing evidence that those properties receive no special benefit from the assessment. Exempted from the assessment would be the areas of public streets, public avenues, public lanes, public roads, public drives, public courts, public alleys, public easements and rights-of-ways, public greenbelts and public parkways. The net amount to be assessed may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels. Proposition 218, approved by the voters in November 1996, requires the City to separate general benefit from special benefit, where only special benefit is assessed. Benefit The maintenance and servicing of the improvements within the District (which are described in the Description of Services and Improvements Section of this report) are for the benefit of the properties within the District, and as such confer a special and direct benefit to parcels within the District by: • improving the livability, appearance, and desirability for properties within the boundaries of the District, and • ensuring that improvements do not reach a state of deterioration or disrepair so as to be materially detrimental to properties within the District, and Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 19 Fiscal Year 2010111 P-196 • providing beautification, shade and overall enhancement to properties within the District. The above mentioned items affect the assessed property in a way that is particular and distinct from their effect on other parcels and that real property in general and the public at large do not share. They contribute to a specific enhancement of the properties within the District. Since these improvements, including the community trails, were installed and are maintained specifically for the properties within the District; only properties within the District receive a special benefit and are assessed for said maintenance. General Benefit In addition to the special benefits received by parcels within the District, there are derivative general benefits that are conferred on parcels outside the boundaries of the District which include: • the control of dust and insect infestations, and • the visual enhancement of the area to persons or vehicles that may travel through the District. However it has been determined that these benefits are derivative and do not provide a direct benefit to parcels outside of the district that are not being assessed. Method of Assessment Spread Each of the parcels within the District is deemed to receive special benefit from the improvements. Each parcel that has a special benefit conferred upon it as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements are identified and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel is determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of the improvements. When the District was formed in 1982, Article XIII D and Proposition 218 had not yet been passed. Upon the passage of Article XIII D and the subsequent passage of the Proposition Omnibus Implementation Act, new rules were put into place. Due to the changes in legal requirements, as property annexed to the District after the passage of the Assessment Law, the description of the method of assessment became more refined, however, the assessment per parcel has remained the same since the 1996/97 Fiscal Year. Further, no parcel included in the District formation or annexations prior to when the language was ref+ned, are now being levied differently than they were at the time the District was formed or the parcels were annexed. To assess special benefit appropriately, it is necessary to relate the different type of parcel improvements to each other. The Equivalent Dwelling Unit ("EDU") method of apportionment uses the single family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single family home equals one Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU). Every other land-use is converted to EDUs based on an assessment formula that equates to the property's specific development status, type of development (land-use), and size of the property, as compared to a single family home. Vacant parcels are assigned an EDU value of 0.25 per acre because they receive a lesser benefit from the improvements until such time as development occurs. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land-use types, as assigned by County use code, to determine each parcel's EDU assignment. Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 20 Fiscal Year 2010/11 P-197 I and.Ltse Equivalent Dwelling Units Pro e T e Coun Use Code EDU Value Multi tier Single Family Residential 1.00 Dwelling Unit Multi-Family Residential 1.00 Dwelling Unit Non-Residential 2.00 Acre Vacant 0.25 Acre The use of the latest County Assessor's Secured Roll shall be the basis for the Property Type determination and units/acreage assignments, unless better data is available to the City. In addition, if any parcel within the District is identified by the County Auditor/Controller to be an invalid parcel number for the current fiscal year, the Property Type and EDU assignment shall be based on the correct parcel number and/or new parcel number(s) County use code and subsequent property information. If a single parcel has changed to multiple parcels, the EDU assignment and assessment amount applied to each of the new parcels will be recalculated rather than spread the proportionate share of the original assessment. Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 21 Fiscal Year 2010/11 P-198 The following table summarizes the Fiscal Year 2010/11 maximum allowable assessment rates for the District: Property Type (County Use Code) Maximum Allowable Assessment Rate er EDU Actual Assessment Rate er EDU Total Units/Acres Total EDUs Single Family Residential $422.00 $422.00 6,322.00 6,322.00 Multi-Family Residential 422.00 422.00 569.00 589.00 Non-Residential 422.00 422.00 50.28 100.56 Vacant 422.00 422.00 16.34 4.09 The total amount of maintenance and incidental costs for maintaining the landscaping and community trail improvements is assessed to the individual parcels of real property within the District in proportion to the special benefit received by such parcels of real property. The proposed individual assessments are shown on the assessment roll in this report. Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 22 Fiscal Year 2010/11 P-7 99 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM An Assessment Diagram for the District is shown on the following page. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the County Assessor of the County San Bernardino, at the time this report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Engineer's Report. Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 23 Fiscal Year 2010!11 N w V 'i y~ .y Q~ 1 ~ ' i ... W ~ '~"' I i i ~... I .._.._ ~ i ny epue~w}3 (~ i i a ~a >t ~ ._a :.............. aai ~Ce e ._.._.._.._.._.._.._. ~ ny ~a}sayooa _... ny lway~ v K m C J m ~ m = y ~ 3 ~ 0 0 m lL ~ r -cv~ N ~~ 0 ® ~ 0 N O ! i i ~ •~° ~ ..~' s N ~ ~ C N l0 m o~ ~'s aU ~t~e EE"g~g ~i€i~' PaaZ $Y_e.. N J NQ a ~ U ~ ~ ^~ J yr \ J ny }se3 in L 7 _.._.._ ° ny epueny}3 I ~ i ~ ,_._._. my uaneH i ' A : I ~ ... ; ! ynyesow~aH a f. ~ L....... , j i i tl _._ inF/ple4!4o~ i _...... - i .. ~.r~ ~ ny uewllaH ~~ N v ' i ~:1 -..~. • ` ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~'F Ex ~i~~~PCdE ~ 'e g~ I ~°C t :YF F ~ ~ ~ I 68 {s b S C ~ 0] ~ O VJ eijgQO6gi€ T ° g L Iti ~?5 ~ ~ ~ m O t~ Q a f ~ajf~:$Ee ~, ~. aaz~a Elg ~3~G P-201 ASSESSMENT ROLL Assessment Roll The assessment roll is a listing of the assessment for Fiscal Year 2010111 apportioned.to each lot or parcel, as shown on the last equalized roll of the Assessor of the County of San Bernardino. The following tables summarize the Fiscal Year 2010/11 maximum and actual assessments for the District: Property Type (County Use Code Maximum Allowable Assessment Rate er EDU Total UnitslAcres Total EDUs Maximum Allowable Assessment Single Family Residential $422.00 6,322.00 6,322.00 $2,667,884.00 Multi-Family Residential 422.00 569.00 589.00 248,558.00 Non-Residential 422.00 50.28 100.56 42,436.32 Vacant 422.00 16.34 4.09 1,725.98 TOTALS 6,977.62 7,015.65 $2,960,604.30 Property Type (County Use Code Actual Assessment Rate er EDU Total Units/Acres Total EDUs Actual Assessment Single Family Residential $422.00 6,322.00 6,322.00 $2,667,884.00 Multi-Family Residential 422.00 589.00 589.00 248,558.00 Non-Residential 422.00 50.28 100.56 42,436.32 Vacant 422.00 16.34 4.09 1,725.98 TOTALS 6,977.62 7,075.65 $2,960,604.30 A copy of the full assessment roll is available for review in the City Clerk's office. Annexations The following annexations are effective for the 2010/11 Fiscal Year: Assessor's Parcel Annexation Total Total Property Type Number Date Pro'ect UnitslAcres EDUs Count Use Code 1089-011-06 6/3/2009 DRC2007-00455 5.08 10.16 Non-Residential Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 24 Fiscal Year 2010/11 P-202 Revised Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2010/2011 City of Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 3A (Hyssop) P-203 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3A (HYSSOP MAINTENANCE DISTRICT) 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Phone: 909.477.2740 Fax: 909.477.2741 CITY COUNCIL Donald J. Kurth, Mayor L. Dennis Michael, Mayor Pro Tem Rex Gutierrez, Council Member Sam Spagnolo, Council Member Diane Williams, Council Member CITY STAFF John R. Gillison, Assistant City Manager Linda D. Daniels, Deputy City Manager William Wittkopf, Public Works Director Jeff Barnes, Park and Landscape Superintendent Ingrid Y. Bruce, GIS/Special Districts Manager Christopher Bopko, Management Analyst III P-204 TABLE OF CONTENTS ENGINEER'S LETTER 1 INTRODUCTION 3 Reason for Assessment .............................................................................................3 Process for Annual Assessment .................................................................................3 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS 5 Description of the Boundaries of the District ...............................................................5 Description of Improvements and Services ................................................................5 Map of Improvements .................................................................................................5 ESTIMATE OF COSTS 6 District Budget ............................................................................................................6 . Definitions of Budget Items .........................................................................................7 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT 9 General .......................................................................................................................9 Special Benefit ...........................................................................................................9 General Benefit ........................................................................................................10 Method of Assessment Spread ................................................................................10 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM ASSESSMENT ROLL 12 13 Assessment Roll .......................................................................................................13 Annexations ..............................................................................................................13 P-205 ENGINEER'S LETTER WHEREAS, on ,the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga (the "City"), under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 (the "1972 Act") adopted its Resolution No. _, a Resolution Initiating Proceedings for the levy of Annual Assessments for Landscape Maintenance District No. 3A (Hyssop Maintenance District) (the "District"); and WHEREAS, the Resolution Initiating Proceedings directed NBS to prepare and file an Engineer's Report for Fiscal Year 2010/11 pursuant to the requirements of the 1972 Act. The Engineer's Report presents the plans and specifications describing the general nature, location and extent of the improvements to be maintained, an estimate of the costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements for the District for the referenced fiscal year, a diagram for the District, showing the area and properties proposed to be assessed, and an assessment of the estimated costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing the improvements, assessing the net amount upon all assessable lots and/or parcels within the District in proportion to the special benefit received; and NOW THEREFORE, the following assessment is proposed to be authorized in order to pay the estimated costs of maintenance, operation and servicing of the improvements to be paid by the assessable real property within the boundaries of the District in proportion to the special benefit received. The following table summarizes the proposed assessment. SUMMARY OF ASSESSMENT Fiscal Year 2010/11 Total Estimated Assessment $3,723.66 Plus Anticipated Delinquency Penalty 736.34 Total Estimated Revenue ~ $4,460.00 Plus Reserve Fund Contribution 880.00 Total Expenditure Budget $5,340.00 Total District EDU Count 9.00 Actual Assessment per EDU $413.74 Maximum Allowable Assessment per EDU $413.74 In making the assessments contained herein pursuant to the 1972 Act: I have identified all parcels which will have a special benefit conferred upon them from the improvements described in the Special Benefit Section of this Engineer's Report (the "Specially Benefited Parcels"). For particulars as to the identification of said parcels, reference is made to the Assessment Diagram, a copy of which is included in this Engineer's Report. I have evaluated the costs and expenses of the improvements upon the Specially Benefited Parcels. In making such evaluation: Landscape Maintenance District No. 3A -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 201 D/11 P-206 a. The proportionate special benefit derived by each Specially Benefited Parcel from the improvements was determined in relationship to the entirety of the maintenance costs of the improvements; b. No assessment has been imposed on any Specially Benefited Parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on such parcel from the improvements; and c. Any general benefits from the improvements have been separated from the special benefits and only special benefits have been assessed. I, the undersigned, respectfully submit the enclosed Engineer's Report and, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, the Engineer s Report, Assessments, and the Assessment Diagram herein have been prepared and computed in accordance with the order of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Assessment Law. Mark A. Stever, Assessment Engineer landscape Maintenance District No. 3A -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2010/11 P-207 -NTRODUCTION Reason for Assessment Approval of the assessment covered by this Engineers Report will generate the revenue necessary to: Provide for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements described in this Engineer's Report. Maintenance may include but is not limited to, all of the following: the repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement, providing for the life, growth, health and beauty of the landscaping, including cultivation, irrigation, trimming, spraying, fertilizing or treating for disease or injury, the removal of trimming, rubbish, debris and other solid waste, the maintenance, repair and replacement as necessary of all irrigation systems and the removal of graffiti from walls immediately adjacent to the cultivated areas. Servicing means the furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operating and servicing of any improvement. Servicing shall also include vehicle, equipment, capital improvements and administrative costs associated with the annual administration and operation of the District. Process for Annual Assessment The City cannot levy and collect annual assessments within the District without complying with the procedures specified in the 1972 Act. On an annual basis, an Engineer's Report must be prepared which contains a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the district. The City Council must also adopt a resolution of intention which: • Declares the intention of the City Council to levy and collect assessments within the assessment district for the fiscal year stated therein. • Generally describes the existing and proposed improvements and any substantial changes proposed to be made in existing improvements. Refers to the assessment district by its distinctive designation and indicate the general location of the district. • Refers to the report of the engineer, on file with the clerk, for a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the district. • Gives notice of the time and place for public hearing by the City Council on the levy of the proposed assessment. • States whether the assessment is proposed to increase from the previous year. If the assessments are to be levied in the same or lesser amounts than the maximum assessment amount approved, the clerk shall give notice by causing the resolution of intention to be published. Any interested person may, prior to the conclusion of the public hearing, file a written protest which shall state all grounds of objection. The protest shall contain a description sufficient to identify the property owned by the property owner filing the protest. During the course or upon conclusion of the hearing, the City Council may order changes in any of the matters provided in the report, including changes in the improvements, any zones within the assessment district, and the proposed diagram or the proposed assessment. The City Council, upon conclusion of the public hearing must then adopt a resolution confirming the diagram and assessment, either as originally proposed or as changed by it. The adoption of the resolution shall constitute the levy of an assessment for the fiscal year referred to in the assessment. Landscape Maintenance District No. 3A -City of Rancho Cucamonga 3 Fiscal Year 2010/11 P-208 If the assessment to be levied exceeds the maximum assessment amount previously approved, the City must comply with the procedures specified in Article XIIID and Proposition 218. The voters in the State of California in November 1996 added Article XIIID to the Califomia Constitution imposing, among other requirements, the necessity for the City to conduct an assessment ballot procedure to enable the owners of each property on which assessments are proposed to be enacted or increased, the opportunity to express their support for, or opposition to the proposed assessment or increase in such assessment. The basic steps of the assessment ballot procedure are outlined below. The City must prepare a Notice of Public Hearing ("Notice'), which describes, along with other mandated information, the reason for the proposed assessments, and to provide a date and time of a public hearing to be held on the matter. The City must also prepare an assessment ballot, which clearly gives the property owner the ability to sign and mark their assessment ballot either in favor of, or in opposition to the proposed assessment. The Notice and assessment ballot are mailed to each affected property owner within the District a minimum of 45 days prior to the public hearing date as shown in the Notice. The City may also hold community meetings with the property owners to discuss the issues facing the District and to answer property owner questions directly. After the Notice and assessment ballot are mailed, property owners are given until the close of the public hearing, stated in the Notice, to return their signed and marked assessment ballot. During the public hearing, property owners are given the opportunity to address the City Council and ask questions or voice their concerns. At the pubiic hearing, the returned assessment ballots received prior to the close of the public hearing are tabulated, weighted by the proposed assessment amount on each property and the results are announced by the City Council. Article XIIID provides that if, as a result of the assessment ballot proceeding, a majority protest is found to exist, the City Council shall not have the authority to levy and collect the assessments as proposed. A majority protest exists if the assessments represented by ballots submitted in opposition exceed those submitted in favor of the assessment. All returned ballots are tabulated and weighted according to the financial obligation of each particular parcel. If there is no majority protest as described above, the City Council may approve the proposed assessments. If there is a majority protest, as described above, the City will not levy and collect any assessments. Landscape Maintenance District No. 3A -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2010/11 P-209 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS The District provides for the administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing of various improvements located within the public right-of-way and dedicated easements within the boundaries of the District. Description of the Boundaries of the District The District is located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California. The boundaries of the District are generally described as that area of the City South and East of Hyssop Drive south of 61h Street. Reference is also made to the Assessment Diagram included in this Report. Description of Improvements and Services The improvements are the maintenance and servicing of landscaping sites and appurtenant facilities throughout the District. The landscaping maintenance includes, but is not limited to, shrubs, turf, tree trimming, weed and pest control, landscape irrigation systems and testing, trash, debris and graffiti removal, and associated appurtenant facilities. Services include personnel, materials, contracting services, utilities, and all necessary costs associated with the maintenance, replacement and repair required to keep the improvements in a healthy, vigorous and satisfactory condition. In addition, it is the City's intention to continue to use cost effective materials, including the future ability to replace landscaping with drought resistant or low water use plants, in order to lower expenses of the District. The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows: Site # Descriptive Location J-1-1 The west side of Hyssop from south of 6r" street to the south end of the cul-de-sac. Ground Cover area: 6,050 square feet. Map of Improvements The following page shows the map of landscaping improvements, including irrigation sites and community trails, to be maintained using District funds. Landscape Maintenance District No. 3A -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2010/11 i ~ g .._ ~~ ~ ~ ~ oee~ 4 .. ~11~ __-_.._.__..._..--____T ... .___. - ~ ---- -- --- -' -- -----_-~.-_...----- --......_ ~- ~ ~ ~l _ --~.~.~K~ r--•..__. _._~_.__-_~-------- --~_AY-tllINV-ll1NtlS----_.__.--~--_._.___ 04::, a ~ ~_ ¢~ >~ ~ ~ Lam. _ ~ --. . ~._... 5. -.~_ h I_ _ _ O -. _~ ~ _-r-_ ~ .n as OS AH 1.... j '' ~ I, 'i ~ ~-- G d ~ ~ o ~ _ . w .,. ___ ~_-- __ •_ O o ~~- 1 ~ N _f l_ ......- i _~ - ~~ ~ ~~~~~ V ~ ' ~~~ ---~ o I ~ ..s-~ J ~ -_i - . --~ ~ - ~ ~ ~ f~ ~ ~; ~ ~,, _..,-q ~ l ~ -..___ N ~.. ..._.__..._r-l I\\~\ ..~ ~j`~~ - --- r_ i ~~ ~__~ J i ~- I ~ I_ ld{INOWH~ M -~ ~~\ ~ 1\ ~ ~- ,- - --- .. ~~, --- s _ - ~ ±ii~i : -- '---------- __ ~ i°l i ~ I F._.__....y P-211 ESTIMATE OF COSTS The estimated costs of administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing the improvements as described in the Plans and Specifications are summarized below. Each year; as part of the assessment district levy calculation process, the costs and expenses are reviewed and the annual costs are projected for the following fiscal year. District Estimated 2010/11 Bud et Personnel Services Regular Payroll $0.00 Part-time Salaries 0.00 Fringe Benefits 0.00 Subtotal Personnel $0.00 Operations and Maintenance Operations and Maintenance $200.00 Contract Services 3,790.00 Tree Maintenance 0.00 Utilities Water Utilities 580.00 Electric Utilities 530.00 Assessment Administration 50.00 General Overhead 190.00 Subtotal Operations and Maintenance $5,340.00 Capital Expenditures Ca ital Pro'ects 0.00 Subtotal Capital Expenditures $0.00 Total Expenditure Budget $5,340.00 Total Estimated Assessment $3,723.66 Plus Anticipated Delinquency Penalty 736.34 Total Estimated Revenue $4,460.00 Plus Operating Reserve Fund Contribution 880.00 Total Expenditure Budget $5,340.00 Total Estimated Assessment $3,723.66 Total District EDU Count ~ 9.00 Actual Assessment per EDU -Fiscal Year 2010/11 $413.74 Maximum Allowable Assessment er EDU -Fiscal Year 2010/11 $413.74 The maximum allowable assessment per EDU listed in the District budget above, is the amount which was approved in 1996197 and subsequent District annexations. Each year, prior to the assessments being placed on the tax roll, the City will review'the budget and determine the amount needed to maintain the improvements for the upcoming fiscal year. The actual assessment per EDU will be based on the estimated costs of maintenance, available fund balance and maximum allowable assessment with the goal of maintaining the improvements in a satisfactory and healthy condition. Landscape Maintenance District No. 3A -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2010111 P-212 The actual assessment amount may be lower than the maximum allowable assessment; however it may not exceed the maximum unless the increase is approved by the property owners in accordance with Proposition 218. It is the intent of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to maintain an Operating Reserve which shall not exceed the estimated costs of maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or when the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The reserve balance information for the District is as follows: Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2010 Reserve Fund Balance $42,995.25 Operating Reserve Contribution -Fiscal Year 2010/11 (880.00) Operating Reserve Collection -Fiscal Year 2010111 0.00 Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2011 Reserve Fund Balance $41,115.25 Definitions of Budget Items The following definitions describe the costs and expenses included in the District Budget: Personnel Services Regular Salaries: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all full-time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Part Time Salaries: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all part time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Fringe Benefits: This item includes the benefits available to City employees: health care, vacation, sick time, and retirement fund. Operations and Maintenance Contract Services: This item includes the contract costs of a landscape maintenance company responsible for the ongoing maintenance of the District improvements. Tree Maintenance: This item includes the contract costs attributed to maintaining the street trees and other trees throughout the District. Utilities -Water: This item includes the casts to furnish water for the landscaping within the District. Utilities -Electric: This item includes the costs to furnish electricity required for the operation and maintenance of the sprinklers and irrigation controllers. Assessment Administration: This item includes the cost to all particular departments and staff of the City, and consultants for providing the administration, coordination and management of District services, operations, and incidental expenses related to the District. This item also includes creation of an annual engineer's report, resolutions and placing the assessment amounts onto the County tax roll each year, along with responding to any public inquiries and future Proposition 216 balloting proceedings. General Overhead: This item includes the costs of all departments and staff of the City for providing the coordination of District services, inspections, annual bid management, responding to public concerns, public education, accounting, auditing and procedural matters associated with the District. This item also includes an allocation for general City staff time for administrative functions and Landscape Maintenance District No. 3A -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2010/11 P-213 systems that provide for a functional and operational assessment district within the City's administrative structure. Capital Expenditures: Capital Projects: This item includes new improvements to further enhance the level and quality of service provided within the boundaries of the District. This may include new monuments, irrigation systems, and other large improvements. Operating Reserve Collection: Operatino Reserve Collection: This item includes the amount to be collected to maintain reserves to enable the City to pay for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or whenever the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The Reserve Fund contribution will continue until such a time the Reserve Fund balance is approximately one half of the annual costs. The fund may be allowed to accumulate in anticipation of any unforeseen expenses not included in the yearly maintenance costs. This may include, but is not limited to, tree replacements, repair of damaged equipment due to vandalism, storms and other similar events. Landscape Maintenance District No. 3A -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2010/11 P-214 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT General Pursuant to the 1972 Act and Article XIIID, all parcels that have a special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements and services shall be identified, and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel shall be determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of improvements. The 1972 Act, permits the establishment of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include the operation, maintenance and servicing of landscaping improvements. Section 22573 of the 1972 Act requires that maintenance assessments must be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. This Section states: "The nef amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district maybe apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable Lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements." The determination of whether or not a lot or parcel will benefit from the improvements shall be made pursuant to the Improvement Act of 1911 (Division 7 (commencing with Section 5000) (of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California]." The 1972 Act also permits the designation of zones of benefit within any individual assessment district if "by reasons or variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive different degrees of benefit from the improvement" (Sec. 22547). Article XIIID, Section 4(a} of the California Constitution limits the amount of any assessment to the proportional special benefit conferred on the property. Article XIIID also provides that publicly owned properties must be assessed unless there is clear and convincing evidence that those properties receive no special benefit from the assessment. Exempted from the assessment would be the areas of public streets, public avenues, public lanes, public roads, public drives, public courts, public alleys, public easements and rights-of-ways, public greenbelts and public parkways. The net amount to be assessed may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels. Proposition 218, approved by the voters in November 1996, requires the City to separate general benefit from special benefit, where only special benefit is assessed. Special Benefit The maintenance and servicing of the improvements within the District (which are described in the Description of Services and Improvements Section of this report) are for the benefit of the properties within the District, and as such confer a special and direct benefit to parcels within the District by: • improving the livability, appearance, and desirability for properties within the boundaries of the District, and • ensuring that improvements do not reach a state of deterioration or disrepair so as to be materially detrimental to properties within the District, and Landscape Maintenance District No. 3A -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2010/11 P-215 • providing beautification, shade and overall enhancement to properties within the District. The above mentioned items affect the assessed property in a way that is particular and distinct from their effect on other parcels and that real property in general and the public at large do not share. They contribute to a specific enhancement of the properties within the District. Since these improvements, including the community trails, were installed and are maintained specifically for the properties within the District; only properties within the District receive a special benefit and are assessed for said maintenance. General Benefit In addition to the special benefits received by parcels within the District, there are derivative general benefits that are conferred on parcels outside the boundaries of the District which include: the control of dust and insect infestations, and • the visual enhancement of the area to persons or vehicles that may travel through the District. However it has been determined that these benefits are derivative and do not provide a direct benefit to parcels outside of the district that are not being assessed. Method of Assessment Spread Each of the parcels within the District is deemed to receive special benefit from the improvements. Each parcel that has a special benefit conferred upon it as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements are identified and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel is determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of the improvements. When the District was formed in 1984, Article XIIID and Proposition 216 had not yet been passed. Upon the passage of Article XIIID and the subsequent passage of the Proposition Omnibus Implementation Act, new rules were put into place. Due to the changes in legal requirements, as property annexed to the District after the passage of the Assessment Law, the description of the method of assessment became more refined, however, the assessment per parcel has remained the same since the 1996197 Fiscal Year. Further, no parcel included in the District formation or annexations prior to when the language was refined, are now being levied differently than they were at the time the District was formed or the parcels were annexed. To assess special benefit appropriately, it is necessary to relate the different type of parcel improvements to each other. The Equivalent Dwelling Unit ("EDU") method of apportionment uses the single family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single family home equals one Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU). Every other land-use is converted to EDUs based on an assessment formula that equates to the property's specific development status, type of development (land-use), and size of the property, as compared to a single family home. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land-use types, as assigned by County use code, to determine each parcel's EDU assignment. Land-Use E uivalent Dwellin Unlts Pro ert T e Coun Use Code EDU Value Multi lier Non-Residential 1.00 Parcel N Landscape Maintenance District No. 3A -City of Rancho Cucamonga 10 Fiscal Year 2010/11 P-216 The use of the latest County Assessor's Secured Roll shall be the basis for the Property Type determination and units/acreage assignments, unless better data is available to the City. In addition, if any parcel within the District is identified by the County AuditorlController to be an invalid parcel number for the current fiscal year, the Property Type and EDU assignment shall be based on the correct parcel number andlor new parcel number(s) County use code and subsequent property information. If a single parcel has changed fo multiple parcels, the EDU assignment and assessment amount applied to each of the new parcels will be recalculated rather than spread the proportionate share of the original assessment. The following table summarizes the Fiscal Year 2010/11 maximum allowable assessment rates for the District: Maximum Allowable Property Type Assessment Rate Actual Assessment Total Total (County Use Code) er EDU Rate per EDU Units/Acres EDUs Non-Residential $413.74 $413.74 9 9 The total amount of maintenance and incidental costs for maintaining the landscaping and community trail improvements is assessed to the individual parcels of real property within the District in proportion to the special benefit received by such parcels of real property. The proposed individual assessments are shown on the assessment roll in this report. Landscape Maintenance District No. 3A -City of Rancho Cucamonga 11 Fiscal Year 2010/11 P-217 ASSESSMENT D/AGRAM An Assessment Diagram for the District is shown on the following page. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the County Assessor of the County San Bernardino, at the time this report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Engineer's Report. Landscape Maintenance District No. 3A - Cify of Rancho Cucamonga 12 Fiscal Year 2010/11 P-218 Q ~ M ~ `~ ~.+ w ~ Q Q ~'~ 0 o ~ - - -- ny luaa4~ ~ ~ ' =~.v..~..~..~: V \ i ~ ~ y r J o N ^ i ~ C _ -.__.._.-_._' .- ~ ~ ~ J N m ~ O j G1 ~ m s g 3 o ~ ! ~ Q ,_ ~ _. j ~ .. .. se~u~u~ ~..~s1 i ' ny lSe3 r ®~ ~ v ~ i ny epuern931 ! ~ _ - ny epuenti;3 V i ~ je ~aa~S i(eo ~ ~ :...;.;. ~ ! j i ,~ ._.._.._.._.._.._._.y ; ~ ~ ~ ~ ny ~aisayooa i . ~ ___•. _~_.___ i I_... .... ~ ny ~alsayaoa ~ I J .,....: ~ i i i : - .. - - d ~.ILW f._.._.._.._.._.._. _ . , i i ~ i i i ~ j ~ j ~ i ~ 9 ' .............._ ,..__ .. ny uaneH ..... . ` _ ... n uane id H i ~ i ny esow~aH i ..._ .. _._ q _ __ ~ ,... i ... _ ........ my esow~aH ~ ~ nb'PIe4l4oib' ~ ...............' ._........ ~. ~ _..._ ! i . . . _ _ .......... .... - en`dPleq!yo~d i ~ • ny uewllaH i ;.... _ i i ~ '._...... A ~„ ~ ~.-'~-'ny uewllaH i ~" ~ i r L ~ ny p~e%au !n 1S uegawe~ i __.._...._ ... ............._... . i t ! 's n a t.._..~ f .•~ ~ i ~~ ~ '~.._:-••L.i....._ur.:.._..._fnyana~ ; ~ san Ejgbfi~~~spg4g ....~..~~..~..~..~.~ ~ y O ` grY.g~ ; .d i~ r -o ~ c ~ m o u_ ¢ . `sF6~EYa ~ w m gaa ' Rg ~F2~gpE¢¢ e _ Sy Y8 ~ 6ea } 93 °_~ F ~ X { ~a~B¢°a~e;H ~ a b°9qG~ ~" d k n$d U s! E s Fa P-219 ASSESSMENT ROLL Assessment Roll The assessment roll is a listing of the assessment for Fiscal Year 2010!11 apportioned to each lot or parcel, as shown on the last equalized roll of the Assessor of the County of San Bernardino. The following tables summarize the Fiscal Year 2010/11 maximum and actual assessments for the District: Maximum Allowable Maximum Property Type Assessment Rate Total Total Allowable Coun Use Code er EDU Units/Acres EDUs Assessment Non-Residential $413.74 9 9 $3,723.66 Actual Property Type Assessment Rate Total Total Actual Coun Use Code per EDU UnitslAcres EDUs Assessment Non-Residential $413.74 9 9 $3,723.66 A copy of the full assessment roll is available for review in the City Clerk's office. Annexations There were no annexations effective for the 2010111 Fiscal Year: Landscape Maintenance District No. 3A -City of Rancho Cucamonga 13 Fiscal Year 2010/11 P-220 Revised Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2010/2011 City of Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance ®istrict No. 3R (Commercial Industrial) P-221 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B (COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL MAINTENANCE DISTRICT) 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Phone: 909.477.2740 Fax: 909.477.2741 CITY COUNCIL Donald J. Kurth, Mayor L. Dennis Michael, Mayor Pro Tem Rex Gutierrez, Council Member Sam Spagnolo, Council Member Diane Williams, Council Member CITY STAFF John R. Gillison, Assistant City Manager Linda D. Daniels, Deputy City Manager William Wittkopf, Public Works Director Jeff Barnes, Park and Landscape Superintendent Ingrid Y. Bruce, GIS/Special Districts Manager Christopher Bopko, Management Analyst III P-222 TABLE OF CONTENTS ENGINEER'S LETTER INTRODUCTION 1 3 Reason for Assessment .............................................................................................3 Process for Annual Assessment .................................................................................3 PLANS AND SPECIF/CAT/0NS 5 Description of the Boundaries of the District ...............................................................5 Description of Improvements and Services ................................................................5 Map of Improvements .................................................................................................6 ESTIMATE OF COSTS 7 District Budget ............................................................................................................7 Definitions of Budget ftems .........................................................................................8 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT 10 General .....................................................................................................................10 Special Benefit .........................................................................................................10 General Benefit ........................................................................................................11 Method of Assessment Spread ................................................................................11 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM ASSESSMENT ROLL 13 14 Assessment Roll .......................................................................................................14 Annexations ..............................................................................................................14 P-223 ENGINEER'S LETTER WHEREAS, on ,the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga (the "City°), under the landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 (the "1972 Act") adopted its Resolution No. _, a Resolution Initiating Proceedings for the Levy of Annual Assessments for Landscape Maintenance District No. 36 (Commercial Industrial Maintenance District) (the "District"); and WHEREAS, the Resolution Initiating Proceedings directed NBS to prepare and file an Engineer's Report for Fiscal Year 2010/11 pursuant to the requirements of the 1972 Act. The Engineer's Report presents the plans and specifications describing the general nature, location and extent of the improvements to be maintained, an estimate of the costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements for the District for the referenced fiscal year, a diagram for the District, showing the area and properties proposed to be assessed, and an assessment of the estimated costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing the improvements, assessing the net amount upon all assessable lots andlor parcels within the District in proportion to the special benefit received; and NOW THEREFORE, the following assessment is proposed to be authorized in order to pay the estimated costs of maintenance, operation and servicing of the improvements to be paid by the assessable real property within the boundaries of the District in proportion to the special benefit received. The following table summarizes the proposed assessment. SUMMARY OF ASSESSMENT Fiscal Year 2010111 Total Estimated Assessment $979,214.04 Less Anticipated Delinquendes 26 934.04 Total Estimated Revenue 5952 280.00 Plus Reserve Fund Contribution 5 120.00 Total Expenditure Budget $1 457,400.00 Total District EDU Count 2,775.55 Actual Assessment per EDU $352.80 Maximum Allowable Assessment per EDU $352.80 In making the assessments contained herein pursuant to the 1972 Act: I have identified all parcels which will have a special benefit conferred upon them from the improvements described in [he Special Benefit Section of this Engineer's Report (the "Specially Benefited Parcels"). For particulars as to the identification of said parcels, reference is made to the Assessment Diagram, a copy of which is included in this Engineer's Report. 2. I have evaluated the costs and expenses of the improvements upon the Specially Benefited Parcels. In making such evaluation: Landscape Maintenance District No. 38 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2010!11 P-224 a. The proportionate special benefit derived by each Specially Benefited Parcel from the improvements was determined in relationship to the entirety of the maintenance costs of the improvements; b. No assessment has been imposed on any Specially Benefited Parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on such parcel from the improvements; and c. Any general benefits from the improvements have been separated from the special benefits and only special benefits have been assessed. I, the undersigned, respectfully submit the enclosed Engineers Report and, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, the Engineer's Report, Assessments, and the Assessment Diagram herein have been prepared and computed in accordance with the order of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Assessment Law. A. Steuer, City Engineer Landscape Maintenance District No. 38 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2010/11 P-225 INTRODUCTION Reason for Assessment Approval of the assessment covered by this Engineer's Report will generate the revenue necessary to: Provide for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements described in this Engineers Report. Maintenance may include but is not limited to, all of the following: the repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement, providing for the life, growth, health and beauty of the landscaping, including cultivation, irrigation, trimming, spraying, fertilizing or treating for disease or injury, the removal of trimming, rubbish, debris and other solid waste, the maintenance, repair and replacement as necessary of all irrigation systems and the removal of graffiti from walls immediately adjacent to the cultivated areas. Servicing means the furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operating and servicing of any improvement. Servicing shall also include vehicle, equipment, capital improvements and administrative costs associated with the annual administration and operation of the District. Process for Annual Assessment The City cannot levy and collect annual assessments within the District without complying with the procedures specified in the 1972 Act. On an annual basis, an Engineer's Report must be prepared which contains a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the district. The City Council must also adopt a resolution of intention which: • Declares the intention of the City Council [o levy and collect assessments within the assessment district for the fiscal year stated therein. • Generally describes the existing and proposed improvements and any substantial changes proposed to be made in existing improvements. • Refers to the assessment district by its distinctive designation and indicate the general location of the district. Refers to the report of the engineer, on file with the clerk, for a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the district. • Gives notice of the time and place for public hearing by the City Council on the levy of the proposed assessment. States whether the assessment is proposed to increase from the previous year. If the assessments are to be levied in the same or lesser amounts than the maximum assessment amount approved, the clerk shall give notice by causing the resolution of intention to be published. Any interested person may, prior to the conclusion of the public hearing, file a written protest which shall state all grounds of objection. The protest shall contain a description sufficient [o identify the property owned by the property owner filing the protest. During the course or upon conclusion of the hearing, the City Council may order changes in any of the matters provided in the report, including changes in the improvements, any zones within the assessment district, and the proposed diagram or the proposed assessment. The City Council, upon conclusion of the public hearing must then adopt a resolution confirming the diagram and assessment, either as originally proposed or as changed by it. The adoption of the resolution shall constitute the levy of an assessment for the fiscal year referred to in the assessment. Landscape Maintenance District No. 38 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 3 Fiscal Year 2010/11 P-226 If the assessment to be levied exceeds the maximum assessment amount previously approved, the City must comply with the procedures specified in Article XIIID and Proposition 218. The voters in the State of California in November 1996 added Article XIIID to the California Constitution imposing, among other requirements, the necessity for the City to conduct an assessment ballot procedure to enable the owners of each property on which assessments are proposed to be enacted or increased, the opportunity to express their support for, or opposition to the proposed assessment or increase in such assessment. The basic steps of the assessment ballot procedure are outlined below. The City must prepare a Notice of Public Hearing ("Notice"), which describes, along with other mandated information, the reason for the proposed assessments, and to provide a date and time of a public hearing to be held on the matter. The City must also prepare an assessment ballot, which clearly gives the property owner the ability to sign and mark their assessment ballot either in favor of, or in opposition to the proposed assessment. The Notice and assessment ballot are mailed to each affected property owner within the District a minimum of 45 days prior to the public hearing date as shown in the Notice. The City may also hold community meetings with the property owners to discuss the issues facing the District and to answer property owner questions directly. After the Notice and assessment ballot are mailed, property owners are given until the close of the public hearing, stated in the Notice, to return their signed and marked assessment ballot. During the public hearing, property owners are given the opportunity to address the City Council and ask questions or voice their concerns. At the public hearing, the returned assessment ballots received prior to the close of the public hearing are tabulated, weighted by the proposed assessment amount on each property and the results zre announced by the City Council. Article XIIID provides that if, as a result of the assessment ballot proceeding, a majority protest is found to exist, the City Council shall not have the authority to levy and collect the assessments as proposed. A majority protest exists if the assessments represented by ballots submitted in opposition exceed those submitted in favor of the assessment. All returned ballots are tabulated and weighted according to the financial obligation of each particular parcel. If there is no majority protest as described above, the City Council may approve the proposed assessments. It there is a majority protest, as described above, the City will not levy and collect any assessments. Landscape Maintenance District No. 38 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2010/11 P-227 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS The District provides for the administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing of various improvements located within the public right-of-way and dedicated easements within the boundaries of the District. Description of the Boundaries of the District The District is located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California. The boundaries of the District are generally described as that area of the City South and East of Hyssop Drive south of 6`h Street. Reference is also made to the Assessment Diagram included in this Report. Description of Improvements and Services The improvements are the maintenance and servicing of landscaping sites and appurtenant facilities throughout the District. The landscaping maintenance includes, but is not limited to, shrubs, turf, tree trimming, weed and pest contrcl, landscape irrigation systems and testing, trash, debris and graffti removal, and associated appurtenant facilities. Services include personnel, materials, contracting services, utilities, and all necessary costs associated with the maintenance, replacement and repair required to keep the improvements in a healthy, vigorous and satisfactory condition. In addition, it is the City's intention to continue to use cost effective materials, including the future ability to replace landscaping with drought resistant or low water use plants, in order to lower expenses of the District. The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows: Site # Descriotive Location J-2 The monument at the northeast corner of Haven and 4th Street. Ground Cover area: 5,715 square feet Turf area: 6,068 square feet J-3 The 6th street median from Milliken to Pittsburg. Ground Cover area: 3,300 square feet J-4 The entry monuments on the east and west side of 4th and Milliken. Ground Cover area: 19,771 square feet Turt area 9,060 square feet J-5 The Milliken median from Arrow to Jersey Ground Cover area: 10,220 square feet J-6 The Spruce median from Foothill to White Oak. Ground Cover area: 4,300 square feet J-7 The nn"th Street median from Pittsburg to Richmond. Ground Cover area: 5,114 square feet J-6 The 6th Street median from Richmond to Buffalo. Ground Cover area: 2,476 square feet J-9 The Milliken railroad underpass. Landscape Maintenance District No. 36 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Prepared by NBS-Fiscal Year 2010/11 P-228 Ground Cover area: 165,633 square feet 12-12-01 added 5199 sq feet Turt area: 4,897 square feet J-10 The 6th street median from Cleveland to 1,820 feet east of Cleveland. Ground Cover area: 13,310 square feet J-11 The 6th Street median from Buffalo to Rochester. Ground cover area: 12,400 square feet J-12 The Milliken median from Arrow to Century. Ground Cover area: 13,855 square feet J-13 The Milliken median from Century to Foothill Blvd. Ground Cover area: 3,330 square feet J-14 The 6th Street median from Utica to Cleveland. J-15 The 6th Street median form Haven to Utica. Ground Cover area: 7,680 square feet. 2-9-36 Day Creek median from Church to Foothill. Ground Cover area: 8,466 square feet 2-10-36 The Day Creek medians south of Foothill including the roundabout. Ground Cover area: 6,490 square feet Map of Improvements The following page shows the map of landscaping improvements, including irrigation sites and community trails, to be maintained using District funds. Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B -City of Rancho Cucamonga Prepared by NBS -Fiscal Year 2010/11 . ® Z F U 7 ' € cw J O O o~ o ~ w ~, ~ z Q ~ w z w w I(( q K w ~ U w ~ w p o E q~ ~ J Z ~ y a Z ~ a .l.__ ~1' ~ 1 ~' pw O O >Q a ~ 4a f"i~iii m ~,J w~ I~ ~ii\ 1- w w K ~ U J~ .1 ~ ~~~~ ~, __ v a a lL J __1 { / III ~~ ~ ~~~~~ , ® ~ 8 ~ I ~ 1 ~..~~-~ J -~-{ -- ,. __ ,>+. ~ ' v -~ r _.: l - ~ ~y _ a C ~ f ~~ ~ o ~ j1y~ I y ~~i~'~~ .lamv{-r Q f~~ j i. ~ r} 1 f' -7-r~ ia'r ~l ~ ~) ka J _~~ , I 'k' ~' ,~ ~ ~.' + `a~"~~ ~y ,.f ~ ~ ~ "fir 1 L ~ ~ ~~ Y ~~~ ~ P4 F- ~~ ~~~~t~ S ~~ ~_.~ ~L ~ ~ _ / ~ ~ 1~ tl 5~~, nix I i I ~, f ~ p E ~ { w ~~ ~. { r.. i ~. ~~ r' +~ i ~. I.- - ! ...-_. .. ~ •y~. ` ~ ~ F ~ S ~z ~ ,t~!;1111i;yi. f ~~ ~~ lttinJt;?~„!ii U P-230 ESTIMATE OF COSTS The estimated costs of administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing the improvements as described in the Plans and Specifications are summarized below. Each year, as part of the assessment district levy calculation process, the costs and expenses are reviewed and the annual costs are projected for the following fiscal year. District Estimated 2010H1 Bud et Personnel Services Regular Payroll $392,230.00 Overtime Salaries 2,630.00 Part-time Salaries 53,700.00 Fringe Benefits 190 260.00 Subtotal Personnel $638,820.00 Operations and Maintenance Operations and Maintenance $59,900.00 Operations and Maintenance/Facilities 4,500.00 Vehicle Operations and Maintenance 1,500.00 Emergency Equipment and Vehice Renlal 2,000.00 Equipment Operations and Maintenance 12,000.00 Contrail Services 395,190.00 Contract Services/Facilities 101,500.00 Tree Maintenance 21,850.00 Ufil'dies Telephone Utilities 1,570.00 Water Utilities 79,190.00 Electric Utilities 34,120.00 Assessment Administration 6,150.00 General Overhead 69.110.00 Subtotal Operations and Maintenance $788,580.00 Capital Expenditures Capital Projects $30,000.00 Subtotal Capital Expenditures $30,000.00 Total Expenditure Budget $1,457,400.00 Total Estimated Assessment $979,214.04 Less Anticipated Delinquencies (26.934.041 Total Estimated Revenue $952,260.00 Plus Operating Reserve Fund Contribution 505.120.00 Total Expenditure Budget $1,457,400.00 Total Estimated Assessment $979,214.04 Total District EDU Count 2,775.55 Actual~Assessment per EDU -Fiscal Year 2010/11 $352.80 I A e U- is IY r2 /11 Landscape Maintenance District No. 38 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Prepared by NBS -Fiscal Year 2010/11 P-231 The maximum allowable assessment per EDU listed in the District budget above, is the amount which was approved in 1996/97 and subsequent District annexations. Each year, prior to the assessments being placed on the tax roll, the City will review the budget and determine the amount needed to maintain the improvements for the upcoming fiscal year. The actual assessment per EDU will be based on the estimated costs of maintenance, available fund balance and maximum allowable assessment with the goal of maintaining the improvements in a satisfactory and healthy condition. The actual assessment amount may be lower than the maximum allowable assessment; however it may not exceed the maximum unless the increase is approved by the property owners in accordance with Proposition 218. It is the intent of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to maintain an Operating Reserve which shall not exceed the estimated costs of maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or when the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The reserve balance information for the District is as follows: Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2010 Reserve Fund Balance $1,427,333.66 Operating Reserve Contribution -Fiscal Year 2010/11 (505,120.00) Operating Reserve Collection -Fiscal Year 2010/11 0.00 Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2011 Reserve Fund riaiance $922,213.66 Definitions of Budget Items The following definitions describe the costs and expenses included in the District Budget: Personnel Services Reoular Salaries: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all full-time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Part Time Salaries: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all part time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Fringe Benefits: This item includes the benefits available to City employees: health care, vacation, sick time, and retirement fund. Operations and Maintenance Contract Services: This item includes the contract costs of a landscape maintenance company responsible for the ongoing maintenance of the District improvements. Tree Maintenance: This item includes the contract costs attributed to maintaining the street trees and other trees throughout the District. Utilities -Water: This item includes the costs to fumish water for the landscaping within the District. Utilities -Electric: This item includes the costs to furnish electricity required for the operation and maintenance of the sprinklers and irrigation controllers. Assessment Administration: This item includes the cost to all particular departments and staff of the City, and consultants for providing the administration, coordination and management of District services, operations, and incidental expenses related to the District. This item also includes creation of an annual engineer's report, resolutions and placing the assessment amounts onto the County tax Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B -City of Rancho Cucamonga Prepared by NBS -Fiscal Year 2010/11 P-232 roll each year, along with responding to any public inquiries and future Proposition 218 balloting proceedings. General Overhead: This item includes the costs of all departments and staff of the City for providing the coordination of District services, inspections, annual bid management, responding to public concerns, public education, accounting, auditing and procedural matters associated with the District. This item also includes an allocation for general City staff time for administrative functions and systems that provide for a functional and operational assessment district within the City's administrative structure. Capital Expenditures: Capital Projects: This item includes new improvements to further enhance the level and quality of service provided within the boundaries of the District. This may include new monuments, irrigation systems, and other large improvements. Operating Reserve Collection: Operating Reserve Collection: This item includes the amount to be collected to maintain reserves to enable the City to pay for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or whenever the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The Reserve Fund contribution wi!I continue until such a time the Reserve Fund balance is approximately one half of the annual costs. The fund may be allowed to accumulate in anticipation of any unforeseen expenses not included in the yearly maintenance costs. This may include, but is not limited to, tree replacements, repair of damaged equipment due to vandalism, storms and other similar events. Landscape Maintenance District No. 38 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Prepared by NBS -Fiscal Year 2010111 P-233 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT General Pursuant to the 1972 Act and Article XIIID, all parcels that have a special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements and services shall be identified, and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel shall be determined in relationship to the entire vests of the maintenance and operation of improvements. The 1972 Act, permits the establishment of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include the operation, maintenance and servicing of landscaping improvements. Section 22573 of the 1972 Act requires that maintenance assessments must be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. This Section states: "The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district maybe apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefit fo be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements. " The determination of whether or not a tot or parcel will benefit from the improvements shall be made pursuant to the Improvement Act of 1911 (Division 7 (commencing with Section 5000} (of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California]." The 1972 Act also permits the designation of zones of benefit within any individual assessment district if "by reasons or variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive different degrees of benefit from the improvement" (Sec. 22547). Article XIIID, Section 4(a) of the Califomia Constitution limits the amount of any assessment to the proportional special benefit conferred on the property. Article XIIID also provides that publicly owned properties must be assessed unless there is clear and convincing evidence that those properties receive no special beriefit from the assessment. Exempted from the assessment would be the areas of public streets, public avenues, public lanes, public roads, public drives, public courts, public alleys, public easements and ;fights-of-ways, public greenbelts and public parkways. The net amount to be assessed may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels. Proposition 218, approved by the voters in November 1996, requires the City to separate general benefit from special benefit, where only special benefit is assessed. Special Benefit The maintenance and servicing of the improvements within the District (which are described in the Description of Services and Improvements Section of this report) are for the benefit of the properties within the District, and as such confer a special and direct benefit to parcels within the District by: • improving the livability, appearance, and desirability for properties within the boundaries of the District, and • ensuring that improvements do not reach a state of deterioration or disrepair so as to be materially detrimental to properties within the District, and Landscape Maintenance District No. 38 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 10 Fiscal Year 2010/11 P-234 • providing beautification, shade and overall enhancement to properties within the District. The above mentioned items affect the assessed property in a way that is particular and distinct from their effect on other parcels and that real property in general and the public at large do not share. They contribute to a specific enhancement of the properties within the District. Since these improvements, including the community trails, were installed and are maintained specifically for the properties within the District; only properties within the District receive a special benefit and are assessed for said maintenance. General Benefif In addition to the special benefits received by parcels within the District, there are derivative general benefits that are conferred on parcels outside the boundaries of the District which include: • the control of dust and insect infestations, and • the visual enhancement of the area to persons or vehicles that may travel through the District. However it has been determined that these benefits are derivative and do not provide a direct benefit to parcels outside of the district that are not being assessed. Method of Assessment Spread Each of the parcels within the District is deemed to receive special benefit from the improvements. Each parcel that has a special benefit conferred upon it as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements are identified and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel is determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of the improvements. When the District was formed in 1984, Article XIIID and Proposition 218 had not yet been passed. Upon the passage of Article XIIID and the subsequent passage of the Proposition Omnibus Implementation Act, new rules were put into place. Due to the changes in legal requirements, as property annexed to the District after the passage of the Assessment Law, the description of the method of assessment became more refined, however, the assessment per parcel has remained the same since the 1996197 Fiscal Year. Further, no parcel included in the District formation or annexations prior to when the language was refined, are now being levied differently than they were at the time the District was formed or the parcels were annexed. To assess special benefit appropriately, it is necessary to relate the different type of parcel improvements to each other. The Equivalent Dwelling Unit ("EDU") method of apportionment uses the single family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single family home equals one Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU). Every other land-use is converted to EDUs based on an assessment formula that equates to the property's specific development status, type of development (land-use), and size of the property, as compared to a single family home. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land-use types, as assigned by County use code, to determine each parcel's EDU assignment. Land-Use E uivalent Dweuin units Pro e T e Coun Use Code EDU Value Multi tier Non-Residential 1.00 Acre Landscape Maintenance District No. 36 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 11 Fiscal Year 2010/11 P-235 The use of the latest County Assessor's Secured Roll shall be the basis for the Property Type determination and units/acreage assignments, unless better data is available to the City. In addition, if any parcel within the District is identified by the County Auditor/Controller to be an invalid parcel number for the current fiscal year, the Property Type and EDU assignment shall be based on the correct parcel number and/or new parcel number(s) County use code and subsequent property information. If a single parcel has changed to multiple parcels, the EDU assignment and assessment amount applied to each of the new parcels will be recalculated rather than spread the proportionate share of the original assessment. The following table summarizes the Fiscal Year 2010111 maximum allowable assessment rates for the District: Property Type Maximum Allowable Actual (County Use Code) Assessment Rate Assessment Rate Total Total er EDU er EDU Units/Acres EDUs Non-Residential $352.80 $352.80 2,775.55 2,775.55 The total amount of maintenance and incidental costs for maintaining the landscaping and community trail improvements is assessed to the individual parcels of real property within the District in proportion to the special benefit received by such parcels of real property. The proposed individual assessments are shown on the assessment roll in this report. Landscape Maintenance District No. 38 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 12 Fiscal Year 2010/11 P-236 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM An Assessment Diagram for the District is shown on the following page. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the County Assessor of the County San Bernardino, at the time this report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Engineer's Report. Landscape Maintenance District No. 38 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 13 Fiscal Year 2010/11 P-237 N N r M ~ '~ ~ . ~ ~_ J ` y > Q ~ ~ Q ~_' U ~ in Q C O p . o 8 ... ny A~ay~ 4 ~ ^~ V i .._.._.._.._; ~ a i J ti r o 1 i N N _-__.--__._-_ ~ ~ C ~ j j i ~ ~ 0 3 0 I ~ ~ ~ i ` .. t E ~ nb' ise3 in ~ ~ ! v ~ i ny epuenn!33~ .......,.~._ ny epuenag3 _.. i. _. ~ ! ~ V ~8 ~aa~~ ~Cea = ny ~alsayooa e ................ ~ ny ~alsayaoa 9 J .. ~ . ~ , __. ny ua~!II!W r._.._.._.._......... .. .... __._ ;.. _ ny ua~l!II!W ny uaneH ny uaneH ny esowFaH (~. ny esow~aH n`d PIeQ!yoib' nH PIe4!4o~H ny uewpaH ~ ny uewilaH ~ L t ny p e%aw ~ n 3S ue!lawe~ f,~= ?24E e~2 ~ a ~ ~~ 2 i nb' anOJ,9 °.s '~ig aS Cn g~pa6~EE~3e~ ( ~ O] A F ~Ig aad E~ N w o O N... ~~~€E~l~s qF i p ~ ~aP ~p ~ fn ~ N m ~ a g@~ g {€.~ ~ t~€ gSfl y € N ~` a c 7 7 { g b6e ~s$C 6x5 g = m g~~SFL ~F p~e 5 ~ ~ x~ Ea p ~s$Ei* ~&~"A E.#s~~8~ 8 ~bbx i3p[~9~9e666Egy ELtt~Y~fti FL P-238 ASSESSMENT ROLL Assessment Roll The assessment roll is a listing of the assessment for Fiscal Year 2010111 apportioned to each lot or parcel, as shown on the last equalized roll of the Assessor of the County of San Bernardino. The following tables summarize the Fiscal Year 2010/11 maximum and actual assessments for the District' Maximum Allowable Maximum Property Type Assessment Rate Total Total Allowable Coun Use Code er EDU UnitslAcres EDUs Assessment Non-Residential $352.80 2,775.55 2,775.55 $979,214.04 Actual Property Type Assessment Rate Total Total Actual Coun Use Code) er EDU Units/Acres EDUs Assessment Non-Residential $352.80 2,775.55 2,775.55 $979,214.04 A copy of the full assessment roll is available for review in the City Clerk's office. Annexations The following annexations are effective for the 2010/11 Fiscal Year: Assessor's Parcel Annexation Total Total Property Type Number Date Pro'ect UnitslAcres EDUs Coun Use Code 0229-141-14 4/15/2009 DRC2005-00703 4.81 4.81 Non-Residential 0207-132-53 8/19/2009 DRC2005-00327 1.52 1.52 Non-Residential D208-101-22, 0206-101-23, 7/1/2009 DRC2008-00587 9.21 9.21 Non-Residential 0208-101-24, 0208-101-25 Landscape Maintenance District No. 38 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 14 Fiscal Year 2010/11 P-239 Revised Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2010/2011 City of Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 (Tot Lot) P-240 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 5 (TOT LOT) 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Phone: 909.477.2740 Fax: 909.477.2741 clrY couNCIL Donald J. Kurth, Mayor L. Dennis Michael, Mayor Pro Tem Rex Gutierrez, Council Member Sam Spagnolo, Council Member Diane Williams, Council Member CITY STAFF John R. Gillison, Assistant City Manager Linda D. Daniels, Deputy City Manager William Wittkopf, Public Works Director Jeff Barnes, Park and Landscape Superintendent Ingrid Y. Bruce, GIS/Special Districts Manager Christopher Bopko, Management Analyst III P-241 TABLE OF CONTENTS ENGINEER'S LETTER INTRODUCTION 1 3 Reason for Assessment .............................................................................................3 Process for Annual Assessment .................................................................................3 PLANS AND SPECIFIGATIONS 5 Description of the Boundaries of the District ...............................................................5 Description of Improvements and Services ................................................................5 Map of Improvements .................................................................................................5 ESTIMATE OF COSTS 6 District Budget ............................................................................................................6 Definitions of Budget Items .........................................................................................7 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT 9 General .......................................................................................................................9 Special Benefit ..........................................................................................................9 General Benefit ........................................................................................................10 Method of Assessment Spread ................................................................................10 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM ASSESSMENT ROLL 72 73 Assessment Roll .......................................................................................................13 Annexations ..............................................................................................................13 P-242 ENGINEER'S LETTER WHEREAS, on ,the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga (the "City"), under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 (the "1972 Act") adopted its Resolution No. _, a Resolution Initiating Proceedings for the Levy of Annual Assessments for Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 (Tot Lot) (the "District"); and WHEREAS, the Resolution Initiating Proceedings directed NBS to prepare and file an Engineer's Report for Fiscal Year 2010/11 pursuant to the requirements of the 1972 Act. The Engineer's Report presents the plans and specifications describing the general nature, location and extent of the improvements ko be maintained, an estimate of the costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements for the District for the referenced fiscal year, a diagram for the District, showing the area and properties proposed to be assessed, and an assessment of the estimated costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing the improvements, assessing the net amount upon all assessable lots and/or parcels within the District in proportion to the special benefit received; and NOW THEREFORE, the following assessment is proposed to be authorized in order to pay the estimated costs of maintenance, operation and servicing of the improvements to be paid by the assessable real property within the boundaries of the District in proportion to the special benefit received. The following table summarizes the proposed assessment. SUMMARY OF ASSESSMENT Fiscal Year 2010111 Total Estimated Assessment $4,984.76 Plus Anticipated Delinquency Penalty 1045.24 Total Estimated Revenue $6,030.00 Plus Reserve Fund Contribution 1 970.OD Total Expenditure Budget $4,060.00 Total District EDU Count 44.00 Actual Assessment per EDU $113.29 Maximum Allowable Assessment per EDU $113.29 In making the assessments contained herein pursuant to the 1972 Act: I have identified all parcels which will have a special benefit conferred upon them from the improvements described in the Special Benefit Section of this Engineer's Report (the "Specially Benefited Parcels"). For particulars as to the identification of said parcels, reference is made to the Assessment Diagram, a copy of which is included in this Engineer's Report. 2. I have evaluated the costs and expenses of the improvements upon the Specially Benefited Parcels. In making such evaluation: Landscape Maintenance District No. 5-City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2010/11 P-243 a. The proportionate special benefit derived by each Specially Benefited Parcel from the improvements was determined in relationship to the entirety of the maintenance costs of the improvements; b. No assessment has been imposed on any Specially Benefited Parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on such parcel from the improvements; and c. Any general benefits from the improvements have been separated from the special benefits and only special benefits have been assessed. I, the undersigned, respectfully submit the enclosed Engineer's Report and, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, the Engineer's Report, Assessments, and the Assessment Diagram herein have been prepared and computed in accordance with the order of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Assessment Law. Mark A. Steuer, Ci ;~ Engineer Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2010111 P-244 INTRODUCTION Reason for Assessment Approval of the assessment covered by this Engineer's Report will generate the revenue necessary to: Provide for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements described in this Engineer's Report. Maintenance may include but is not limited to, all of the following: the repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement, providing for the life, growth, health and beauty of the landscaping, including cultivation, irrigation, trimming, spraying, fertilizing or treating for disease or injury, the removal of trimming, rubbish, debris and other solid waste, the maintenance, repair and replacement as necessary of all irrigation systems and the removal of graffiti from walls immediately adjacent to the cultivated areas. Servicing means the furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operating and servicing of any improvement. Servicing shall also include vehicle, equipment, capital improvements and administrative costs associated with the annual administration and operation of the District. Process for Annual Assessment The City cannot levy and collect annual assessments within the District without complying with the procedures specified in the 1972 Act. On an annual basis, an Engineer's Report must be prepared which contains a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the district. The City Council must also adopt a resolution of intention which: • Declares the intention of the City Council to levy and collect assessments within the assessment district for the fiscal year stated therein. • Generally describes the existing and proposed improvements and any substantial changes proposed to be made in existing improvements. • Refers to the assessment district by its distinctive designation and indicate the general location of the district. • Refers to the report of the engineer, on file with the clerk, for a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the district. • Gives notice of the time and place for public hearing by the City Council on the levy of the proposed assessment. • States whether the assessment is proposed to increase from the previous year. If the assessments are to be levied in the same or lesser amounts than the maximum assessment amount approved, the clerk shall give notice by causing the resolution of intention to be published. Any interested person may, prior to the conclusion of the public hearing, file a written protest which shall state all grounds of objection. The protest shall contain a description sufficient to identify the property owned by the property owner filing the protest. During the course or upon conclusion of the hearing, the City Council may order changes in any of the matters provided in the report, including changes in the improvements, any zones within the assessment district, and the proposed diagram or the proposed assessment. The City Council, upon conclusion of the public hearing must then adopt a resolution confirming the diagram and assessment, either as originally proposed or as changed by it. The adoption of the resolution shall constitute the levy of an assessment for the fiscal year referred to in the assessment. Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 3 Fiscal Year 2010/11 P-245 If the assessment to be levied exceeds the maximum assessment amount previously approved, the City must comply with the procedures specified in Article XIII D and Proposition 218. The voters in the State of California in November 1996 added Article XIII D to the California Constitution imposing, among other requirements, the necessity for the City to conduct an assessment ballot procedure to enable the owners of each property on which assessments are proposed to be enacted or increased, the opportunity to express their support for, or opposition to the proposed assessment or increase in such assessment. The basic steps of the assessment ballot procedure are outlined below. The City must prepare a Notice of Public Hearing ("Notice"), which describes, along with other mandated information, the reason for the proposed assessments, and to provide a date and time of a public hearing to be held on the matter. The City must also prepare an assessment ballot, which clearly gives the property owner the ability to sign and mark their assessment ballot either in favor of, or in opposition to the proposed assessment. The Notice and assessment ballot are mailed to each affected property owner within the District a minimum of 45 days prior to the public hearing date as shown in the Notice. The City may also hold community meetings with the property owners to discuss the issues facing the District and to answer property owner questions directly. After the Notice and assessment ballot are mailed, property owners are given until the close of the public hearing, stated in the Notice, to return their signed and marked assessment ballot. During the public hearing, property owners are given the opportunity to address the City Council and ask questions or voice their concerns. At the public hearing, the returned assessment ballots received prior to the close of the public hearing are tabulated, weighted by the proposed assessment amount on each property and the results are announced by the City Council. Article XIII D provides that if, as a result of the assessment ballot proceeding, a majority protest is found to exist, the City Council shalt not have the authority to levy and collect the assessments as proposed. A majority protest exists if the assessments represented by ballots submitted in opposition exceed those submitted in favor of the assessment. All returned ballots are tabulated and weighted according to the financial obligation of each particular parcel. If there is no majority protest as described above, the City Council may approve the proposed assessments. If there is a majority protest, as described above, the City will not levy and collect any assessments. Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2010/11 P-246 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS The District provides for the administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing of various improvements located within the public right-of-way and dedicated easements within the boundaries of the DisVict. Description of the Boundaries of the District The District is located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California. The boundaries of the District are generally described as that area of the City bounded by Hermosa Avenue on the west, 26`" Avenue on the south, the parcels north of and along Bedford Drive and the parcels west of and along Andover Place. Reference is also made to the Assessment Diagram included in this Repcrt. Description of Improvements and Services The improvements are the maintenance and servicing of landscaping sites and appurtenant facilities throughout the District. The landscaping maintenance includes, but is not limited to, shrubs, turt, tree trimming, weed and pest control, landscape irrigation systems and testing, trash, debris and graffiti removal, and associated appurtenant facilities. Services include personnel, materials, contracting services, utilities, and all necessary costs associated with the maintenance, replacement and repair required to keep the improvements in a healthy, vigorous and satisfactory condition. In addition, it is the City's intention to continue tc use cost effective materials, including the future ability to replace landscaping with drought resistant or low water use plants, in order to lower expenses of the District. The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows: Parks: Tot Lot. Site # Descriptive Location I-1-5 The tot lot on the southwest corner of Andover and Bedford. Ground Cover area: 1,506 square feet Turf area: 1,070 square feet Parks are maintained by the City's Park Maintenance Crews Map of Improvements The following page shows the map of landscaping improvements, including irrigation sites and community trails, to be maintained using District funds. Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2010/11 ,, ___... _. ~. ', , i 1 i _._ __. __. _ ~ I ... ........ .. r ~~ 16 .. .~ .. i ! _. .. .. t . '. 1, - ~ I .. .. ... ... _. ._ ~ '. I ~ 4 .. , Y i ~ '~. ~ ~ j ....__.._ D z ~ ~ I D 1 a ~ ~ ~~~ ' _ ~ _... ... .. _ t J - ~ ~ ~ ', _ D .. .. _.. _ _. c~ .~. _, ~ ~ ~ I I ~ ?. i i { E I i I 1 i i ~ ~ r ~- - i r n~ n ~D ~~ ~D W n iD O ~. n~ ~. C?1 P-248 ESTIMATE OF COSTS The estimated costs of administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing the improvements as described in the Plans and Specifications are summarized below. Each year, as part of the assessment district levy calculation process, the costs and expenses are reviewed and the annual costs are projected for the following fiscal year. District Budget - Estimated 2010/17 Bud et Personnel Services Regular Payroll $0.00 Part-time Salaries 0.00 Fringe Benefits 0.00 Subtotal Personnel $0.00 Operations and Maintenance Operations and Maintenance - $800.00 Vehicle Operations and Maintenance 70.00 Contract Services 1,690.00 Contract Services/Facilities 0.00 Tree Maintenance 0.00 Utilities Water Utilities 420.00 Electric Utilities 480.00 Assessment Administration 240.00 General Overhead 360.00 Subtotal Operations and Maintenance $4,060.00 Capital Expenditures Capital Protects $0.00 Subtotal Capital Expenditures $0.00 Total Expenditure Budget $4,060.00 Total Estimated Assessment $4,964.76 Plus Anticipated Delinquency Penalty ~ 1.045.24 Total Estimated Revenue $6,030.00 Less Operating Reserve Fund Collection 1 970.00 Total Expenditure Budget $4,060.00 Total Estimated Assessment $4,984.76 Total District EDU Count 44.00 Actual Assessment per EDU -Fiscal Year 2010/11 $113.29 Maximum Allowable Assessment er EDU -Fiscal Year 2010111 $113.29 The maximum allowable assessment per EDU listed in the District budget above, is the amount which was approved in 1996197 and subsequent District annexations. Each year, prior to the assessments being placed on the tax roll, the City will review the budget and determine the amount needed to maintain the improvements for the upcoming fiscal year. The actual assessment per EDU will be Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2010!11 P-249 based on the estimated costs of maintenance, available fund balance and maximum allowable assessment with the goal of maintaining the improvements in a satisfactory and healthy condition. The actual assessment amount may be lower than the maximum allowable assessment; however it may not exceed the maximum unless the increase is approved by the property owners in accordance with Proposition 218. It is the intent of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to maintain an Operating Reserve which shall not exceed the estimated costs of maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or when the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The reserve balance information for the District is as follows: Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2010 Reserve Fund Balance $72,130.59 Operating Reserve Contribution -Fiscal Year 2010/11 0.00 Operating Reserve Collection -Fiscal Year 2010/11 1.970.00 Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2011 Reserve Fund Balance $74,100.59 Definitions of 8udgef Items The following definitions describe the costs and expenses included in the District Budget Personnel Services Regular Salaries: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all full-time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Part Time Salaries: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all part time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Fringe Benefits: This item includes the benefits available to City employees: health care, vacation, sick time, and retirement fund. Operations and Maintenance Contract Services: This item includes the contract costs of a landscape maintenance company responsible for the ongoing maintenance of the District improvements. Tree Maintenance: This item includes the contract costs attributed to maintaining the street trees and other trees throughout the District. Utilities -Water. This item includes the costs to furnish water for the landscaping within the District. Utilities -Electric: This item includes the costs to furnish electricity required for the operation and maintenance of the sprinklers and irrigation controllers. Assessment Administration: This item includes the cost to all- particular departments and staff of the City, and consultants for providing the administration, coordination and management of District services, operations, and incidental expenses related to the District. This item also includes creation of an annual engineer's report, resolutions and placing the assessment amounts onto the County tax roll each year, along with responding to any public inquiries and future Proposition 218 balloting proceedings. General Overhead: This item includes the costs of all departments and staff of the City for providing the coordination of District services, inspections, annual bid management, responding to public Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2010/11 P-250 concerns, public education, accounting, auditing and procedural matters associated with the District. This item also includes an allocation for general City staff time for administrative functions and systems that provide for a functional and operational assessment district within the City's administrative structure. Capital Expenditures: Capital Projects: This item includes new improvements to further enhance the level and quality of service provided within the boundaries of the District. This may include new monuments, irrigation systems, and other large improvements. Operating Reserve Collection: Ooeratino Reserve Collection: This item includes the amount to be collected to maintain reserves to enable the City to pay for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or whenever the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The Reserve Fund contribution will continue until such a time the Reserve Fund balance is approximately one half of the annual costs. The fund may be allowed to accumulate in anticipation of any unforeseen expenses not included in the yearly maintenance costs. This may include, but is not limited to, tree replacements, repair of damaged equipment due to vandalism, storms and other similar events. Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2010/11 P-251 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT General Pursuant to the 1972 Act and Article XIII D, all parcels that have a special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements and services shall be identified, and the proportionate special benefit derived by each ident~ed parcel shall be determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of improvements. The 1972 Act, permits the establishment of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include the operation, maintenance and servicing of landscaping improvements. Section 22573 of the 1972 Act requires that maintenance assessments must be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. This Section states: "The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district maybe apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements." The determination of whether or not a lot or parcel will benefit from the improvements shall be made pursuant to the Improvement Act of 1911 (Division 7 (commencing with Section 5000] (of the Streets and Highways Code, State of CalifomiaJ." The 1972 Act also permits the designation of zones of benefit within any individual assessment district if "by reasons or variations in [he nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive different degrees of benefit from the improvement" (Sec. 22547). Article XIII D, Section 4(a) of the California Constitution limits the amount of any assessment to the proportional special benefit conferred on the property. Article XIII D also provides that publicly owned properties must be assessed unless there is clear and convincing evidence that those properties receive no special benefit from the assessment. Exempted from the assessment would be the areas of public streets, public avenues, public lanes, public roads, public drives, public courts, public alleys, public easements and rights-of-ways, public greenbelts and public parkways. The net amount to be assessed may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels. Proposition 218, approved by the voters in November 1996, requires the City to separate general benefit from special benefit, where only special benefit is assessed. Benefit The maintenance and servicing of the improvements within the District (which are described in the Description of Improvements and Services Section of this report) are for the benefit of the properties within the District, and as such confer a special and direct benefit to parcels within the District by: • improving the livability, appearance, and desirability for properties within the boundaries of the District, and • ensuring that improvements do not reach a state of deterioration or disrepair so as to be materially detrimental to properties within the District, and Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2010/11 P-252 • providing beautification, shade and overall enhancement to properties within the District. The above mentioned items affect the assessed property in a way that is particular and distinct from their effect on other parcels and that real property in general and the public at large do not share. They contribute to a specific enhancement of the properties within the District. Since these improvements, including the community trails, were installed and are maintained specifically for the properties within the District; only properties within the District receive a special benefit and are assessed for said maintenance. General Benefit In addition to the special benefits received by parcels within the District, there are derivative general benefits that are conferred on parcels outside the boundaries of the District which include: • the control of dust and insect infestations, and • the visual enhancement of the area to persons or vehicles that may travel through the District. However it has been determined that these benefits are derivative and do not provide a direct benefit to parcels outside of the district that are not being assessed. Method of Assessment Spread Each of the parcels within the District is deemed to receive special benefit from the improvements. Each parcel that has a special benefit conferred upon it as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements are identified and the proportionate special beneft derived by each identified parcel is determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of the improvements. When the District was formed in 1984, Article XIII D and Proposition 218 had not yet been passed. Upon the passage of Article XIII D and the subsequent passage of the Proposition Omnibus Implementation Act, new rules were put into place. Due to the changes in legal requirements, as property annexed to the District after the passage of the Assessment Law, the description of the method of assessment became more refined, however, the assessment per parcel has remained the same since the 1996/97 Fiscal Year. Further, no parcel included in the District formation or annexations prior to when the language was refined, are now being levied differently than they were at the time the District was formed or the parcels were annexed. To assess special benefit appropriately, it is necessary to relate the different type of parcel improvements to each other. The Equivalent Dwelling Unit ("EDU") method of apportionment uses the single family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single family home equals one Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU). Every other land-use is converted to EDUs based on an assessment formula that equates to the property's specific development status, type of development (land-use), and size of the property, as compared to a single family home. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land-use types, as assigned by County use code, to determine each parcel's EDU assignment. Land-Use Equivalent Dwelling Units Pro e T e Coun Use Code EDU Value Multi lier Single Family Residential 1.OD Dwelling Unit Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 10 Fiscal Year 2010/11 P-253 The use of the latest County Assessor's Secured Roll shall be the basis for the Property Type determination and units/acreage assignments, unless better data is available to the City. In addition, if any parcel within the District is identified by the County Auditor/Controller to be an invalid parcel number for the current fiscal year, the Property Type and EDU assignment shall be based on the correct parcel number and/or new parcel numbers} County use code and subsequent property information. If a single parcel has changed to multiple parcels, the EDU assignment and assessment amount applied to each of the new parcels will be recalculated rather than spread the proportionate share of the original assessment. The following table summarizes the Fiscal Year 2010/11 maximum allowable assessment rates for the District: Maximum Allowable Property Type Assessment Rate Actual Assessment Total Total (County Use Code) er EDU Rate per EDU Units/Acres EDUs Single Family Residential $113.29 $113.29 44 44 The total amount of maintenance and incidental costs for maintaining the landscaping and community trail improvements is assessed to the individual parcels of real property within the District in proportion to the special benefit received by such parcels of real property. The proposed individual assessments are shown on the assessment roll in this report. Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 11 Fiscal Year 2010!11 P-254 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM An Assessment Diagram for the District is shown on the following page. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the County Assessor of the County San Bernardino, at the time this report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Engineer's Report. Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 12 Fiscal Year 2010/11 v ~L w .y V C W r.+ .C ny ua~lll!W ny (u~a4~ N C J CD ~ s 3 p o m lL ~~ d 0 N O ny epueinl~3 ;. r{ 6 '3_~I ' o __.... ~ i 8 ~ae~~ /ed i . ny ~alsayoob ! i i n esow~a ° ' _._.. ... '___ ...~ d H r........ . ,' i nHPIeQ!4o~V i_........._.._ .:....:............. .._... i i iS ue!lawe~ : ._ ............... _ i i i ,~ ..__ (n ~ ~ N T '~ C N ~ m ~~ L V ~ s-.._.-~ti.i-.._...i..-..-~ ny anal ~ c m ~ iq J t m y t O W ~] li E ~ O ~ U ~ ~ ~. J ti~ ny ~Se~ V1 P-256 ASSESSMENT ROLL Assessment Roll The assessment roll is a listing of the assessment for Fiscal Year 2010/11 apportioned to each lot or parcel, as shown on the last equalized roll of the Assessor of the County of San Bernardino. The following tables summarize the Fiscal Year 2010!11 maximum and actual assessments for the District: Maximum Allowable Maximum Property Type Assessment Rate Total Total Allowable Coun Use Code er EDU Units/Acres EDUs Assessment Single Family Residential $113.29 44 44 $4,984.76 Actual Property Type Assessment Rate Total Total Actual Coun Use Code per EDU UnitslAcres EDUs Assessment Single Family Residential $113.29 44 44 $4,984.76 A copy of the full assessment roll is available for review in the City Clerk's office. Annexations There were no annexations effective for the 2010/11 Fiscal Year: Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 13 Fiscal Year 2010/11 P-257 Revised Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2010/2011 City of Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 6 (Caryn Planned Community) P-258 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 6 (CARYN PLANNED COMMUNITY) 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Phone: 909.477.2700 Fax: 909.477.2741 CITY COUNCIL Donald J. Kurth, Mayor L. Dennis Michael, Mayor Pro Tem Rex Gutierrez, Council Member Sam Spagnolo, Council Member Diane Williams, Council Member CITY STAFF John R. Gillison, Assistant City Manager Linda D. Daniels, Deputy City Manager William Wittkopf, Public Works Director Jeff Barnes, Park and Landscape Superintendent Ingrid Y. Bruce, GIS/Special Districts Manager Christopher Bopko, Management Analyst III P-259 TABLE OF CONTENTS ENGINEER'S LETTER ~ INTRODUCTION 3 Reason for Assessment .............................................................................................3 Process for Annual Assessment .................................................................................3 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS 5 Description of the Boundaries of the District ...............................................................5 Description of Improvements and Services ................................................................5 Map of Improvements .................................................................................................8 ESTIMATE OF COSTS 9 District Budget ............................................................................................................9 Definitions of Budget Items .......................................................................................10 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT 12 General .....................................................................................................................12 Special Benefit .........................................................................................................12 General Benefit ........................................................................................................13 Method of Assessment Spread ................................................................................13 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM ASSESSMENT ROLL 75 16 P.ssessment Rol1 .......................................................................................................16 Annexations ..............................................................................................................16 P-260 ENGINEER'S LETTER WHEREAS, on ,the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga (the "City"), under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 (the "1972 Act") adopted its Resolution No. _, a Resolution Initiating Proceedings for the Levy of Annual Assessments for Landscape Maintenance District No. 6 (Caryn Planned Community) (the "District"); and WHEREAS, the Resolution Initiating Proceedings directed NBS to prepare and fle an Engineer's Report for Fiscal Year 2010!11 pursuant to the requirements of the 1972 Act. The Engineer's Report presents the plans and specifications describing the general nature, location and extent of the improvements to be maintained, an estimate of the costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements for the District for the referenced fiscal year, a diagram for the District, showing the area and properties proposed to be assessed, and an assessment of the estimated costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing the improvements, assessing the net amount upon all assessable lots and/or parcels within the District in proportion to the special benefit received; and NOW THEREFORE, the following assessment is proposed to be authorized in order to pay the estimated costs of maintenance, operation and servicing of the improvements to be paid by the assessable real property within the boundaries of the District in proportion to the special benefit received. The following table summarizes the proposed assessment. SUMMARY OF ASSESSMENT Fiscal Year 2010/11 Total Estimated Assessment $315,133.72 Less Anticipatetl Delinquencies 15443.72 Total Estimated Revenue $299,690.00 Less Reserve Fund Collection 28 110.00 Total Expenditure Budget $271,580.00 Total District EDU Count 1,276.00 Actual Assessment per EDU $246.97 Maximum Allowable Assessment per EDU $246.97 In making the assessments contained herein pursuant to the 1972 Act: 1 have identified all parcels which will have a special benefit conferred upon them from the improvements described in the Special Benefit Section of this Engineer's Report (the "Specially Benefited Parcels"). For particulars as to the identification of said parcels, reference is made to the Assessment Diagram, a copy of which is included in this Engineer's Report. 2. I have evaluated the costs and expenses of the improvements upon the Specially Benefited Parcels. In making such evaluation: Landscape Maintenance District No. 6 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2010111 P-261 a. The proportionate special benefit derived by each Specially Benefited Parcel from the improvements was determined in relationship to the entirety of the maintenance costs of the improvements; No assessment has been imposed on any Specially Benefited Parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on such parcel from the improvements; and c. Any general benefits from the improvements have been separated from the special benefits and only special benefits have been assessed. I, the undersigned, respectfully submit the enclosed Engineer's Report and, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, the Engineer's Report, Assessments, and the Assessment Diagram herein have been prepared and computed in accordance with the order of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Assessment Law. Mark A. Steuer, City Engineer Landscape Maintenance District No. 6 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2010/11 P-262 INTRODUCTION Reason for Assessment Approval of the assessment covered by this Engineer's Report will generate the revenue necessary to: Provide for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements described in this Engineer's Report. Maintenance may include but is not limited to, all of the following: the repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement, providing for the life, growth, health and beauty of the landscaping, including cultivation, irrigation, trimming, spraying, fertilizing or treating for disease or injury, the removal of trimming, rubbish, debris and other solid waste, the maintenance, repair and replacement as necessary of all irrigation systems and the removal of graffiti from walls immediately adjacent to the cultivated areas. Servicing means the furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operating and servicing of any improvement. Servicing shall also include vehicle, equipment, capital improvements and administrative costs associated with the annual administration and operation of the District. Process for Annual Assessment The City cannot levy and collect annual assessments within the District without complying with the procedures specified in the 1972 Act. On an annual basis, an Engineer's Report must be prepared which contains a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the district. The City Council must also adopt a resolution of intention which: • Declares the intention of the City Council to levy and collect assessments within-the assessment district for the fiscal year stated therein. • Generally describes the existing and proposed improvements and any substantial changes proposed to be made in existing improvements. • Refers to the assessment district by its distinctive designation and indicate the general location of the district. • Refers to the report of the engineer, on file with the clerk, for a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the district. • Gives notice of the time and place for public hearing by the City Council on the levy of the proposed assessment. • States whether the assessment is proposed to increase from the previous year. If the assessments are to be levied in the same or lesser amounts than the maximum assessment amount approved, the clerk shall give notice by causing the resolution of intention to be published. Any interested person may, prior to the conclusion of the public hearing, file a written protest which shall state all grounds of objection. The protest shall contain a description sufficient to identify the property owned by the property owner filing the protest. During the course or upon conclusion of the hearing, the City Council may order changes in any of the matters provided in the report, including changes in the improvements, any zones within the assessment district, and the proposed diagram or the proposed assessment. The City Council, upon conclusion of the public hearing must then adopt a resolution confrming the diagram and assessment, either as originally proposed or as changed by it. The adoption of the resolution shall constitute the levy of an assessment for the fiscal year refereed to in the assessment. Landscape Maintenance District No. 6 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 3 Fiscal Year 2010/11 P-263 If the assessment to be levied exceeds the maximum assessment amount previously approved, the City must comply with the procedures specified in Article XIII D and Proposition 218. The voters in the State of California in November 1996 added Article XIII D to the Califomia Constitution imposing, among other requirements, the necessity for the City to conduct an assessment ballot procedure to enable the owners of each property on which assessments are proposed to be enacted or increased, the opportunity to express their support for, or opposition to the proposed assessment or increase in such assessment. The basic steps of the assessment ballot procedure are outlined below. The City must prepare a Notice of Public Hearing ("Notice"), which describes, along with other mandated information, the reason for the proposed assessments, and to provide a date and time of a public hearing to be held on the matter. The City must also prepare an assessment ballot, which clearly gives the property owner the ability to sign and mark their assessment ballot either in favor of, or in opposition to the proposed assessment. The Notice and assessment ballot are mailed to each affected property owner within the District a minimum of 45 days prior to the public hearing date as shown in the Notice. The City may also hold community meetings with the property owners to discuss the issues facing the District and to answer property owner questions directly. After the Notice and assessment ballot are mailed, property owners are given until the close of the public hearing, stated in the Notice, to return their signed and marked assessment ballot. During the public hearing, property owners are given the opportunity to address the City Council and ask questions or voice their concerns. At the public hearing, the returned assessment ballots received prior to the close of the public hearing are tabulated, weighted by the proposed assessment amount on each property and the results are announced by the City Council. Article XIII D provides that if, as a result of the assessment ballot proceeding, a majority protest is found to exist, the City Council shall not have the authority to levy and collect the assessments as proposed. A majority protest exists if the assessments represented by ballots submitted in opposition exceed those submitted in favor of the assessment. All returned ballots are tabulated and weighted according to the financial obligation of each particular parcel. If there is no majority protest as described above, the City Council may approve the proposed assessments. If there is a majority protest, as described above, the City will not levy and collect any assessments. Landscape Maintenance District No. 6 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2010/11 P-264 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS The District provides for the administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing of various improvements located within the public right-of-way and dedicated easements within the boundaries of the District. Description of the Boundaries of the Districf The District is located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California. The boundaries of the District are generally described as that area of the City known as the Caryn Planned Community, which is generally bounded by Milliken Avenue on the west, Banyan Street on the north, Highland Avenue on the south and Rochester Avenue on the east. Reference is also made to the Assessment Diagram included in this Report. Description of Improvements and Services The improvements are the maintenance and servicing of landscaping sites and appurtenant facilities throughout the District. The landscaping maintenance includes, but is not limited to, shrubs, turf, tree trimming, weed and pest control, landscape irrigation systems and testing, trash, debris and graffiti removal, and associated appurtenant facilities. Services include personnel, materials, contracting services, utilities, and all necessary costs associated with the maintenance, replacement and repair required to keep the improvements in a healthy, vigorous and satisfactory condition. In addition, it is the City's intention to continue to use cost effective materials, including the future ability to replace landscaping with drought resistant or low water use plants, in order to lower expenses of the District. The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows: Site # Descriptive Location CC-1 The Southside of Banyan St. from 1290 feet west of Milliken to Milliken. The west side pf Milliken & median from Banyan St. to 292 south of Vintage Dr. Ground Cover area: 96,892 square feet Turt area: 17,945 square feet Hardscape area: 13,944 square feet CC-2 For information purposes: This site was deleted 7-1-00 and was combined with CC-1 CC-3 The paseo on the west side of Morning PI. from Morning PI. to Deer Creek Channel. Ground Cover area: 2,801 square feet Turf area: 124 square feet Hardscape area: 4,609 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 6 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2010/11 P-265 CC-4 The west side of Morning PI., from Banyan St. to Starview PI. The north side of Starview PI., from Morning PI. to Star View Ct. Ground Cover area: 14,273 square feet Turf area: 5,513 square feet Hardscape area: 5,000 square feet CC-5 Silver Sun paseo from the end of Silver Sun cul-de-sac to Deer Creek Channel. Ground Cover area: 25,890 square feet Turf area: 12,084 square feet Hardscape area: 1,350 square feet CC-6 The east and west side of Netherlands View Loop from Vintage Dr. to Vintage Dr. The Netherlands View Loop paseo from Netherlands View Loop to Mt Sterling Ct. Ground Cover area: 88,902 square feet Turf area: 676 square feet Hardscape area: 23,650 square feet CC-7 The east and west side of Hillview Loop from Mt. Rainer Ct. to Kettle Peak. Ground Cover area: 14,930 square feet Turf area: 6,318 square feet Hardscape area: 12,236 square feet CC-B The paseo from Hillview Loop to Vintage Dr. Ground Cover area: 42,107 square feet Turf area: 22,752 square feet Hardscape area: 4,089 square feet CC-9 The south side of Vintage Dr. from 250 feet west of Hillview Loop to Hillview Loop. The west side of Hillview Loop from Vintage Dr. to Kettle Peak. The west side of Kettle Peak from Hillview Loop to Donner Pass Ct. The east side of Hillview Loop from Kettle Peak to Tioga Peak. Ground Cover area: 47,334 square feet Turf area: 4,954 square feet Hardscape area: 9,088 square feet CC-10 The east side of Terrace View Loop from Vintage Dr. to Butler Peak. The west side of Terrace View Loop from Rainbow Falls Ct. to Vintage Dr. Ground Cover area. ^^<4,603 square feet Hardscape area: 10,760 square feet CC-11 The paseo from Caryn School to Banyan St. The south side of Banyan St. from the paseo to Rochester Ave. The east and west side of Mt. Baldy Ct. from Banyan St. to Sierra Crest View Loop. The north side of Sierra Crest View Loop from Hilltop Ct. to Woodland Ct. Ground Cover area: 47,507 square feet Turf area: 7,810 square feet Hardscape area: 7,825 square feet CC-12 The Separation Paseo ftom Vintage Dr. to Pinnacle Peak. Ground Cover area: 50,325 square feet Turf area: 15,021 square feet Hardscape area: 7,675 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 6 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2010/11 P-266 CC-13 The east side of Hillview Loop from Tioga Peak Ct. to Vintage Dr. The south side of Vintage Dr. from Hillview Loop to Terrace View Loop. The north side of Vintage Dr. from Hillview Loop to Caryn School. The east side of Tercace View Loop from Vintage Dr. to Mt. San Antonio Ct. Ground Cover area: 26,162 square feet Turf area: 4,508 square feet Hardscape area: 12,928 square feet CC-14 The east side of Sierra Crest View Loop from Mt. Waverly to Vintage Dr. The north side of Vintage Dr. from Sierra Crest View Loop to Sierra Crest View Loop. The east and west side of Sierra Crest View Loop from Vintage Dr. to Mt. Wilson Ct. The south side of Vintage Dr. from Netherlands View Loop to 330 feet west of Netherlands View Loop. Ground Cover area: 73,250 square feet Turf area: 16,525 square feet Hardscape area: 9,885 square feet CC-15 The south side of Sierra Crest View Loop from Mt. Waverly Ct. to Mt. Cambridge Ct. The north side of Sierra Crest View Loop from Mt. Cambridge Ct. to Woodland Ct. The north side of Sierra Crest View Loop from Hilltop Ct. to Caryn School. The Sierra Crest View Loop paseo from Sierra Crest View Loop to Mt. Sherman Ct. Ground Cover area: 70,990 square feet Turf area: 7,699 square feet Hardscape area: 20.055 square feet CC-16 The south side of Vintage Dr. from Netherlands View Loop to Rochester Ave. The north side of Vintage Dr. from Rochester Ave. to Sierra Crest View Loop. The east and west side of Sierra Crest View Loop from Mt. Wilson Ct. to Mt. Cambridge Ct. The Netherlands View Loop Paseo from Vintage Dr. to Mt. Sterling Ct. Ground Cover area: 77,202 square feet Turf area: 3,954 square feet Hardscape area: 18,195 square feet CC-17 The east side of Milliken Ave. from Vintage Dr. to Banyan St. Ground Cover area: 13,740 square feet Turt area: 9,088 square feet Hardscape area: 6,460 square feet CC-1o The north side of Vintage Dc from Milliken Ave. to Hillview Loop. The south side of Vintage Dr. from 104 feet west of Hillview Loop to Milliken Ave. Ground Cover area: 32,287 square feet Turf area: 3,889 square feet Hardscape area: 11,188 square feet CC-19 The Terrace View Loop paseo from Vintage Dr. to Terrace View Loop. Ground Cover area: 17,496 square feet Turt area: 15,617 square feet Hardscape area: 2,736 square feet CC-20 The east side of Terrace View Loop from Mt. San Antonio Ct. to EI Capitan Ct. The west side of Terrace View Loop from Butler Peak PI. to Mt San Antonio Ct. Ground Cover area: 20,627 square feet Turt area: 20,017 square feet Hardscape area:. 7,888 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 6 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2010/11 P-267 CC-21 The west side of Rochester from Banyan to 317 feet south of Vintage Dr. Ground Cover area: 31,292 square feet CC-22 The south side of Vintage Dr. from Terrace View Loop to Sierra Crest View Loop. The east and west side of Hillview Loop from Vintage Dr. to Mt. Rainer Ct. Ground Cover area: 11,609 square feet Turf area: 3,763 square feet Hardscape area: 6,524 square feet CC-23 The south side of Banyan from Milliken to Butler Peak PI. The west side of Butler Peak PI. from Banyan St. to Terrace View Loop. The north side of Terrace View Loop from Butler Peak PI. to Rainbow Falls Ct. Ground Cover area: 12,132 square feet Hardscape area: 528 square feet CC-24 The north side of Terrace View Loop from EI Capitan Ct. to Butler Peak PI. The east side of Butler Peak PI, from Terrace View Loop to Banyan St. The south side of Banyan St. from Butler Peak PI. to 990 feet east of Butler Peak PI. Ground Cover area: 14,452 square feet Hardscape area: 1,600 square feet CC-25 This site was moved to CC-13. This mainline was part of CC-13 and should not have been its own site. CC-26 The east side of Rochester from 210 freeway [o Vintage Dr. The north and south side of Vintage from to Rochester to Thunder Mountain Ct. The west side of Rochester from 317 feet south of Vintage Dr. to the 210 freeway. Ground Cover area: 35,037 square feet Hardscape area: 19,779 square feet CC-27 The Milliken median and the westside of Milliken from 292 feet south of Vintage to 210 freeway. Ground Cover area: 13,365 square feet Hardscape area: 12,300 square feet CC-28 The east side of Milliken from Vintage to the 210 freeway right- of-way. Ground Cover area: 17,724 square feet Cobble area: 2,387 square feet Hardscape area: 5,810 square feet Total Ground Cover: 922,929 square feet Total Turf: 178,257 square feet Total Hardscape: 238,489 square feet Map of Improvements The following page shows the map of landscaping improvements, including irrigation sites and community trails, to be maintained using District funds. Landscape Maintenance District No. 6 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2010/11 pdpd 5 ` ~~ @ H 5 3 V E q LL ~ B ^~ l ' mos ~ ~ ~ i J B 0 70 ~~R .~ wIyw, P •d ^v^ c ^^\ ^~ ~+ 0 ^~ W J G. O ~' n S KSBURO AV ~ ~ P-26~ ~: ~ TH Nrarv av ~~ ~ o ~~f N ~ ~gp~~; ~._~ m ..U ~ 9I ~F » I- 6 ~'KPWF3~3G'K V - E ~S ,ROCHESTER AI ~ U I NPHSA PL' VUINIAPL '. m a. m ~,9 O ~ e. HTO PL ~~ O ~ u . ti+ua*x,E .i~u V n ... ~ O ~ ~ VE 4 VENTO PL J. z ~ w- MONTELgRLO aL ~ ~ . y ~. R ~s,l ~~ v ~I ,lo D v m' ~ ~' ~ .. ~'': ' r ~ ~.. ~ u °s~,... ~ ~ ~ ~ y ~ E ~ ,U_ D F~ 4 Q~, LAYANIA pL'~ T ri ~ U u.~- 2 2.' a 00 (J® ~ .~ ~; ~, i5. ? m; < ¢...~ F', m ~~ MESBINAPL ~. .. ..= R°~gTY1lE p ~=U CMT RENGPL I, rc W -7a,0 ~t ; ~.. p= 4 U ~~ bb , tf y y... m A Y Od. 2\~({ :: (~#1 ~ o ~N. @@~~ (~ _ 111 0 u Y ~' U 4U dWp YJL~ y rf ~ ~ d F S hf ~ ~ SMT LOO y' a' ,D'. P .KPI W000 O a @~ ~ V ~YY RUFP°L ~ YW . E ~P U ~ .~. _U ~w al U ~ Urc g; ~3 PLyc • ~.c .. ~ _,o ~ i IIF u Jti ~ ;A U~VWELLL~OTON LT EAGLE PEAK..VL ~ NDR ~ ~FAIRWINpS- kpy aL m < fF- O 6 4 C I? ~- V 'm s a $ r D$ o~ s suMUEI ~~xw_.....~.v.L~~,~ V _ y' A - MILLIKENAV ~U '.tiny ~\!~. 7 Q,~ U A I I ,~ '- t sdvERwo U ® ~~ ' . ERAOfoao cT ~ ' cavlro~ rc z r G Go _ ~ s ~ ff if 4y < ~I ~' r 1 ~Dfo°~ t. r ~ A ~ y o .~, ' a m II ~~~0 w ` I OP ~\ s I 1 `il a.F~ 1~ Lei o WEST1.10NTgV / et I ! ~. I~ ~ ~ -ro I ~~. MoorvslinDOw PL '(- o ~.. ~ z° ~- J I ~. ,~c ~ - .lmi ~~1 ~ EASI ~ / I i _ m / { L I I mi }, I EELNAVEH LT ~~ VPHD.' II ~ _ ~~I 1 ,a~ ~ ~, i !w~ I l t i \ l I I. _ i I O U \ ....~ 6UNNYHiLLS PL ~ I ~S. TWILIGHT PI,jr ~; F>IRMONT WY I 'a ..~ ~~ DRNING PLT- MORNINO GLE0.~ ~{ ~ ~' ~ 3y ~. ZO ! _; 1 ~ ~I."O ~ i I I ' I it __ _:. r I ` 'In' 'i i~ mW.' _. i ym _ 4, M. ~ U ~F' Z -b ORWHT4 --.:av.,f#»r... °T'. _ _ -..- ~" tuLt Ur - Ojy ~ Lo ah.. V: ~~~~ fP OS~ Y ALRDI ' O ~ BLUE 0.1DGEPL P-269 ESTIMATE OF COSTS The estimated costs of administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing the improvements as described in the Plans and Specifications are summarized below. Each year, as part of the assessment district levy calculation process, the costs and expenses are reviewed and the annual costs are projected for the following fiscal year. District Budget Estimated 2010/11 Bud et Personnel Services Regular Payroll $7,120.00 Part-time Salaries 0.00 Fringe Benefits 3.350.00 Subtotal Personnel $10,470.00 Operations and Maintenance Operations and Maintenance $6,OD0.00 Vehicle Operations and Maintenance 0.00 Contact Services 99,420.00 Contrail Services/Facilities 0.00 Tree Maintenance 16,870.00 Utilities Water Utilities 10D,800.00 Electric Utilities ~ 6,260.00 Assessment Administration 7,020.00 General Overhead 24 740.00 Subtotal Operations and Maintenance $261,110.00 Capital Expenditures Caudal Protects 0.00 Subtotal Capital Expenditures $0.00 Total District Expenditure Budget $271,580.00 Total Estimated Assessment $315,133.72 Less Anticipated Delinquencies (15.443.721 Total Estimated Revenues $299,690.00 Less Operating Reserve Fund Collection (28,11D.00) Total Expenditure Budget $271,580.0() Total Estimated Assessment $315,133.72 Total District EDU Count 1,276.00 Actual Assessment per EDU -Fiscal Year 201 D/11 $246.97 Maximum Allowable Assessment er EDU -Fiscal Year 2010/11 $246.97 The maximum allowable assessment per EDU listed in the District budget above, is the amount which was approved in.1996/97 and subsequent DisVict annexations. Each year, prior to the assessments being placed on the tax roll, the City will review the budget and determine the amount needed to maintain the improvements for the upcoming fiscal year. The actual assessment per EDU will be Landscape Maintenance District No. 6 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2010!11 P-270 based on the estimated costs of maintenance, available fund balance and maximum allowable assessment with the goal of maintaining the improvements in a satisfactory and healthy condition. The actual assessment amount may be lower than the maximum allowable assessment; however it may not exceed the maximum unless the increase is approved by the property owners in accordance with Proposition 218. It is the intent of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to maintain an Operating Reserve which shall not exceed the estimated costs of maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or when the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The reserve balance information for the District is as follows: Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2010 Reserve Fund Balance $10,030.67 Operating Reserve Contribution -Fiscal Year 2010/17 0.00 Operating Reserve Collection -Fiscal Year 2010/11 28.110.00 Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2011 Reserve Fund Balance $38,140.67 Definitions of Budget Items The following definitions describe the costs and expenses included in the District Budget Personnel Services Reoular Salaries: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all full-time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Part Time Salaries: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all part time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Fringe Benefits: This item includes the benefits available to City employees: health care, vacation, sick time, and retirement fund. Operations and Maintenance Contract Services: This item includes the contract costs of a landscape maintenance company responsible for the ongoing maintenance of the District improvements. Tree Maintenance: This item includes the contract costs attributed to maintaining the street trees and other trees throughout the District. Utilities -Water: This item includes the costs to furnish water for the landscaping within the District. Utilities -Electric: This item includes the costs to furnish electricity required for the operation and maintenance of the sprinklers and irrigation controllers. Assessment Administration: This item includes the cost to all particular departments and staff of the City, and consultants for providing the administration, coordination and management of District services, operations, and incidental expenses related to the District. This item also includes creation of an annual engineer's report, resolutions and placing the assessment amounts onto the County tax roll each year, along with responding to any public inquiries and future Proposition 218 balloting proceedings. General Overhead: This item includes the costs of all departments and staff of the City for providing the coordination of District services, inspections, annual bid management, responding to public Landscape Maintenance District No. 6 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 10 Fiscal Year 2010/11 P-271 concerns, public education, accounting, auditing and procedural matters associated wish the District. This item also includes an allocation for general City staff time for administrative functions and systems that provide for a functional and operational assessment district within the City's administrative structure. Capital Expenditures: Caoital Projects: This item includes new improvements to further enhance the level and quality of service provided within the boundaries of the District. This may include new monuments, irrigation systems, and other large improvements. Operating Reserve Collection: Operating_Reserve Collection: This item includes the amount to be collected to maintain reserves to enable the City to pay for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or whenever the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The Reserve Fund contribution will continue until such a time the Reserve Fund balance is approximately one half of the annual costs. The fund may be allowed to accumulate in anticipation of any unforeseen expenses not included in the yearly maintenance costs. This may include, but is not limited to, tree replacements, repair of damaged equipment due to vandalism, stones and other similar events. Landscape Maintenance District No. 6 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 11 Fiscal Year 2010/11 P-272 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT General Pursuant to the 1972 Act and Article XIII D, all parcels that have a special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements and services shall be identified, and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel shalt be determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of improvements. The 1972 Act, permits the establishment of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include the operation, maintenance and servicing of landscaping improvements. Section 22573 of the 1972 Act requires that maintenance assessments must be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. This Section states: "The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district maybe apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements." The determination of whether or not a lot or parcel will benefit from the improvements shall be made pursuant to the Improvement Acf of 1911 (Division 7 (commencing with Section 5000) (of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California]." The 1972 Act also permits the designation of zones of benefit within any individual assessment district if "by reasons or variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive different degrees of benefit from the improvement" (Sec. 22547). Article XIII D, Section 4(a) of the California Constitution limits the amount of any assessment to the proportional special benefit conferred on the property. Article XIII D also provides that publicly owned properties must be assessed unless there is clear and convincing evidence that those properties receive no special benefit from the assessment. Exempted from the assessment would be the areas of public streets, public avenues, public lanes, public roads, public drives, public courts, public alleys, public easements and rights-of-ways, public greenbelts and public parkways. The net amount to be assessed may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels. Proposition 21 B, approved by the voters in November 1996, requires the City to separate general benefit from special benefit, where only special benefit is assessed. Benefit The maintenance and servicing of the improvements within the District (which are described in the Description of Improvements and Services Section of this report) are for the benefit of the properties within the District, and as such confer a special and direct benefit to parcels within the District by: • improving the livability, appearance, and desirability for properties within the boundaries of the District, and • ensuring that improvements do not reach a state of deterioration or disrepair so as to be materially detrimental to properties within the District, and Landscape Maintenance District No. 6 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 12 Fisca_I Year 2010/11 P-273 • providing beautification, shade and overall enhancement to properties within the District. The above mentioned items affect the assessed property in a way that is particular and distinct from their effect on other parcels and that real property in general and the public at large do not share. They contribute to a specific enhancement of the properties within the District. Since these improvements, including the community trails, were installed and are maintained specifically for the properties within the District; only properties within the District receive a special benefit and are assessed for said maintenance. General Benefit In addition to the special benefits received by parcels within the District, there are derivative general benefits that are conferred on parcels outside the boundaries of the District which include: • the control of dust and insect infestations, and • the visual enhancement of the area to persons or vehicles that may travel through the District. However it has been determined that these benefits are derivative and do not provide a direct benefit to parcels outside of the district that are not being assessed. Method of Assessment Spread Each of the parcels within the District is deemed to receive special benefit from the improvements. Each parcel that has a special benefit conferred upon it as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements are ident~ed and the proportionate special benefit derived by each ident'fiied parcel is determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of the improvements: When the District was formed in 1984, Article XIII D and Proposition 218 had not yet been passed. Upon the passage of Article XIII D and the subsequent passage of the Proposition Omnibus Implementation Act, new rules were put into place. Due to the changes in legal requirements, as property annexed to the District after the passage of the Assessment Law, the description of the method of assessment became more refined, however, the assessment per parcel has remained the same since the 1996/97 Fiscal Year. Further, no parcel included in the District formation or annexations prior to when the language was refined, are now being levied differently than they were at the time the District was formed or the parcels were annexed. To assess special benefit appropriately, it is necessary to relate the different type of parcel improvements to each other. The Equivalent Dwelling Unit ("EDU") method of apportionment uses the single family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single family home equals one Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU). Every other land-use is converted to EDUs based on an assessment formula that equates to the property's specific development status, type of development (land-use), and size of the property, as compared to a single family home. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land-use types, as assigned by County use code, to determine each parcel's EDU assignment. Land-Use E uivalent Dwellin Units Pro e T e Coun Use Code) EDU Value Multi lier Single Family Residential 1.00 Dwelling Unit Landscape Maintenance District No. 6 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 13 Fiscal Year 2010111 P-274 The use of the latest County Assessor's Secured Roll shall be the basis for the Property Type determination and units/acreage assignments, unless better data is available to the City. In addition, if any parcel within the District is identified by the County AuditorlController to be an invalid parcel number for the current fiscal year, the Property Type and EDU assignment shall be based on the correct parcel number and/or new parcel number(s) County use code and subsequent property information. If a single parcel has changed to multiple parcels, the EDU assignment and assessment amount applied to each of the new parcels will be recalculated rather than spread the proportionate share of the original assessment. The following table summarizes the Fiscal Year 2010/11 maximum allowable assessment rates for the District: Maximum Allowable Property Type Assessment Rate Actual Assessment Totat Total (County Use Code) er EDU Rate per EDU Units/Acres EDUs Single Family Residential $246.97 $246.97 1,276 1,276 The total amount of maintenance and incidental costs for maintaining the landscaping and community trail improvements is assessed to the individual parcels of real property within the District in proportion to the special benefit received by such parcels of real property. The proposed individual assessments are shown on the assessment roll in this report. Landscape Maintenance District No. 6 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 14 Fiscal Year 2010/11 P-275 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM An Assessment Diagram for the District is shown on the following page. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the County Assessor of the County San Bernardino, at the time this report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Engineer's Report. Landscape Maintenance District No. 6 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 15 Fiscal Year 2010/11 P-276 //~~ N ~V ~ ~i ~ °~ +~ 1~ 'y c ~ ° O c p ~ U ~ °~ N ..- d ~ C1 .-.---- --. ..._.______...._...... n ti~a ~ ~ d 4~ ~ t r V ~ C ~ ._.._.._.._ ! ~ J ti.. • N i i N /.., _ ~ .. ~' ..., - ~,, J m ... I _._._.__... ~ _ ~ o ~_ • ~ m ~ 0 ... i ._.._..~L C e i '_ i ~.._.._, In,d35e3 w i ~ ,- - - r..e..~r.. fy t ny epuennil3 , ,' ! i ~ ~ I ! -~ ~ ~ i V I i ' ~~ i I _ . ............._..-.i.._..._ _.. ; ;. ~ ~9 ~aa1~ Xep , ~ ~_.._.._.._.._.._.. ~ 8 ~ ny ~alsayooa _ _...... .... ~ ....._ ~ n ~a sa o0 ~\ . ............ I y 3 4 a I . r_._...,. ~i 1 . _._. f ny ua~!II!W f._.._.._.. ..e-.._..... _..__ ... ....__ _..'... i ny ua~!II!W i 6 ~ i . i ,, i i 1 ny uanel.{ ; . _ _......... _ .. ...~ __... ,_ ......... _ _. i ........_ uny uaneH G ~ ~i , ! ; nyesow~aH i. __........ ..._ F '_ ;. _. _-[n esow~a ~ ~; I d H i i ~I ny PIeyl4oFb' .......... ~ _, ... _.r ~__.... ,. _inV pley!yoaV i • ny uewllaH i _ ... , ~. ~_.._ :. s' ~ ny uewllaH i ' ~ L 1 ~ L ~ ! 1 ` .._ { .............:............I f'p i .. _ .. i ny p~e/au!/~ lS uegawe~ i ' .... ....... _ a , I ~.~ ! ~FiS E{~l ~{~6 Y' e r r l r..r..~r..~.... .~..~ _ N O EY `f ~i$F~~ ~ ~ m LL ¢ =°[Y ~6YFf F~. N T L`f ~~S~~6~c~ N N ~`p~~l gfb EiF m Beia 9j~~y = FE ~!: Leg °,~e¢gp u°a ~~ '~.~Y~g~6 ,z~ i3 E~°~ e~~~ U F{Sfe$F s~$z P-277 ASSESSMENT ROLL Assessment Roll The assessment roll is a listing of the assessment for Fiscal Year 2010/11 apportioned to each lot or parcel, as shown on the last equalized roll of the Assessor of the County of San Bernardino. The following tables summarize the Fiscal Year 2010/11 maximum and actual assessments for the District: Maximum Allowable Maximum Property Type Assessment Rate Total Total Allowable Coun Use Code er EDU UnitslAcres EDUs Assessment Single Family Residential $246.97 1,276 1,276 $315,133.72 Actual Property Type Assessment Rate Total Total Actual Coun Use Code er EDU UnitslAcres EDUs Assessment Single Family Residential $246.97 1,276 1,276 $315,133.72 A copy of the full assessment roll is available for review in the City Clerk's office. Annexations There were no annexations effective for the 2010/11 Fiscal Year: Landscape Maintenance District No. 6 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 16 Fiscal Year 2010/11 P-278 Revised Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2010/2011 City of Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 (North Etiwanda) P-279 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0.7 (NORTH ETIWANDA) 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Phone: 909.477.2740 Fax: 909.477.2741 CITY COUNCIL Donald J. Kurth, Mayor L. Dennis Michael, Mayor Pro Tem Rex Gutierrez, Council Member Sam Spagnolo, Council Member Diane Williams, Council Member CITY STAFF John R. Gillison, Assistant City Manager Linda D. Daniels, Deputy City Manager William Wittkopf, Public Works Director Jeff Barnes, Park and Landscape Superintendent Ingrid Y. Bruce, GISlSpecial Districts Manager Christopher Bopko, Management Analyst III P-280 TABLE OF CONTENTS ENGINEER'S LETTER INTRODUCTION 1 3 Reason for Assessment .............................................................................................3 Process for Annual Assessment .................................................................................3 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS 5 Description of the Boundaries of the District ...............................................................5 Description of Improvements and Services ................................................................5 Map of Improvements .................................................................................................9 ESTIMATE OF COSTS 10 District Budget ..........................................................................................................10 Definitions of Budget Items .......................................................................................11 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT 13 General .....................................................................................................................13 Special Benefit .......................................:.................................................................13 General Benefit ........................................................................................................14 Method of Assessment Spread ................................................................................14 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM ASSESSMENT ROLL 16 17 Assessment RoII .......................................................................................................17 Annexations ..............................................................................................................17 P-281 ENGINEER'S LETTER WHEREAS, on ,the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 (the "1972 Act") adopted its Resolution No. _, a Resolution Initiating Proceedings for the Levy of Annual Assessments for Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 (North Etiwanda) (the "District"); and WHEREAS, the Resolution Initiating Proceedings directed NBS to prepare and file an Engineer's Report for Fiscal Year 2010/11 pursuant to the requirements of the 1972 Act. The Engineer's Report presents the plans and specifications describing the general nature, location and extent of the improvements to be maintained, an estimate of the costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements for the District for the referenced fiscal year, a diagram for the District, showing the area and properties proposed to be assessed, and an assessment of the estimated costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing the improvements, assessing the net amount upon all assessable lots and/or parcels within the District in proportion to the special benefit received; and NOW THEREFORE, the following assessment is proposed to be authorized in order to pay the estimated costs of maintenance, operation and servicing of the improvements to be paid by the assessable real property within the boundaries of the District in proportion to the special benefit received. The following table summarizes the proposed assessment. SUMMARY OF ASSESSMENT Fiscal Year 2010/11 Total Estimated Assessment $841,624.05 Less Anticipated Delinquencies 26 604.05 Total Estimated Revenue $815,020.00 Plus Reserve Fund Contribution 141 890.00 Total Expenditure Budget ~ $956,910.00 Total District EDU Count 2,741.00 Actual Assessment per EDU $307.05 Maximum Allowable Assessment per EDU $307.05 In making the assessments contained herein pursuant to the 1972 Act: I have identified all parcels which will have a special benefit conferred upon them from the improvements described in the Special Benefit Section of this Engineer's Report (the "Specially Benefited Parcels"). For particulars as to the identification of said parcels, reference is made to the Assessment Diagram, a copy of which is included in this Engineer's Report. 2. I have evaluated the costs and expenses of the improvements upon the Specially Benefited Parcels. In making such evaluation: Landscape Maintenance District No. 7-City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2010111 P-282 a. The proportionate special benefit derived by each Specially Benefited Parcel from the improvements was determined in relationship to the entirety of the maintenance costs of the improvements; b. No assessment has been imposed on any Specially Benefited Parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on such parcel from the improvements; and c. Any general benefits from the improvements have been separated from the special benefits and only special benefits have been assessed. I, the undersigned, respectfully submit the enclosed Engineer's Report and, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, the Engineer's Report, Assessments, and the Assessment Diagram herein have been prepared and computed in accordance with the order of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Assessment Law. Mark A. Stever, City Engineer Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2010/11 P-283 INTRODUCTION Reason for Assessment Approval of the assessment covered by this Engineers Report will generate the revenue necessary to: Provide for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements described in this Engineers Report. Maintenance may include but is not limited to, all of the following: the repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement, providing for the life, growth, health and beauty of the landscaping, including cultivation, irrigation, trimming, spraying, fertilizing or treating far disease or injury, the removal of trimming, rubbish, debris and other solid waste, the maintenance, repair and replacement as necessary of all irrigation systems and the removal of graffiti from walls immediately ad,'acent to the cultivated areas. Servicing means the furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operating and servicing of any improvement. Servicing shall also include vehicle, equipment, capital improvements and administrative costs associated with the annual administration and operation of the District. Process for Annual Assessment The City cannot levy and collect annual assessments within the District without complying with the procedures specified in the 1972 Act. On an annual basis, an Engineer's Report must be prepared which contains a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the district. The City Council must also adopt a resolution of intention which: • Declares the intention of the City Council to levy and collect assessments within the assessment district for the fiscal year stated therein. • Generally describes the existing and proposed improvements and any substantial changes proposed to be made in existing improvements. • Refers to the assessment district by its distinctive designation and indicate the general location of the district. • Refers to the report of the engineer, on file with the clerk, for a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the district. • Gives notice of the time and place for public hearing by the City Council on the levy of the proposed assessment. • States whether the assessment is proposed to increase from the previous year. If the assessments are to be levied in the same or lesser amounts than the maximum assessment amount approved, the clerk shall give notice by causing the resolution of intention to be published. Any interested person may, prior to the conclusion of the public hearing, file a written protest which shall state all grounds of objection. The protest shall contain a description sufficient to identify the property owned by the property owner filing the protest. During the course or upon conclusion of the hearing, the City Council may order changes in any of the matters provided in the report, including changes in the improvements, any zones within the assessment district, and the proposed diagram or the proposed assessment. The City Council, upon conclusion of the public hearing must then adopt a resolution confirming the diagram and assessment, either as originally proposed or as changed by it. The adoption of the resolution shall constitute the levy of an assessment for the fiscal year referred to in the assessment. Landscape Maintenance District No. 7-City of Rancho Cucamonga 3 Fiscal Year 2010111 P-284 If the assessment to be levied exceeds the maximum assessment amount previously approved, the City must comply with the procedures specified in Article XIIID and Proposition 218. The voters in the State of California in November 1996 added Article XIIID to the California Constitution imposing, among other requirements, the necessity for the City to conduct an assessment ballot procedure to enable the owners of each property on which assessments are proposed to be enacted or increased, the opportunity to express their support for, or opposition to the proposed assessment or increase in such assessment. The basic steps of the assessment ballot procedure are outlined below. The City must prepare a Notice of Public Hearing ("Notice"), which describes, along with other mandated information, the reason for the proposed assessments, and to provide a date and time of a public hearing to be held on the matter. The City must also prepare an assessment ballot, which clearly gives the property owner the ability to sign and mark their assessment ballot either in favor of, or in opposition to the proposed assessment. The Notice and assessment ballot are mailed to each affected property owner within the District a minimum of 45 days prior to the public hearing date as shown in the Notice. The City may also hold community meetings with the property owners to discuss the issues facing the District and to answer property owner questions directly. After the Notice and assessment ballot are mailed, property owners are given until the close of the public hearing, stated in the Notice, to return their signed and marked assessment ballot. During the public hearing, property owners are given the opportunity to address the City Council and ask questions or voice their concerns. At the public hearing, the returned assessment ballots received prior to the close of the public hearing are tabulated, weighted by the proposed assessment amount on each property and the results are announced by the City Council. Article XIIID provides that if, as a result of the assessment ballot proceeding, a majority protest is found to exist, the City Council shall not have the authority to levy and collect the assessments as proposed. A majority protest exists if the assessments represented by ballots submitted in opposition exceed those submitted in favor of the assessment. All returned ballots are tabulated and weighted according to the financial obligation of each particular parcel. If there is no majority protest as described above, the City Council may approve the proposed assessments. If there is a majority protest, as described above, the City will not levy and collect any assessments. Landscape Maintenance District No. 7-City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2010/11 P-285 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS The District provides for the administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing of various improvements located within the public right-of-way and dedicated easements within the boundaries of the District. Description of fhe Boundaries of the District The District is located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California. The boundaries of the District are generally described as that area of the City known as North Etiwanda, which is generally bounded by the 210 Freeway on the south, I-15 on the west, and City limits on the north. Typically parcels have been annexed to the District as they have developed. Reference is also made to the Assessment Diagram included in this Report. Description of Improvements and Services The improvements are the maintenance and servicing of landscaping sites and appurtenant facilities throughout the District. The various landscaping sites that are maintained consist of parkways, median islands, street trees, paseos and community trails located within street right-of-ways and dedicated public easements which are within the boundaries of the District. The landscaping maintenance includes, but is not limited to, shrubs, turf, tree trimming in irrigated City parkways and paseos, weed and pest control, landscape irrigation systems and testing, trash, debris and graffiti removal, and associated appurtenant facilities. Services include personnel, materials, contracting services, utilities, and all necessary costs associated with the maintenance, replacement and repair required to keep the improvements in a healthy, vigorous and satisfactory condition. In addition, it is the City's intention to continue to use cost effective materials, including the future ability to replace landscaping with drought resistant or low water use plants, in order to lower expenses of the District. The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows: Parks: Etiwanda Creek Paris. Site # Descriptive Location EN-1 The North side of Wilson from San Sevaine to Ridgeline: The Eastside of Ridgeline from Wilson to Arcadia, the south side of Arcadia from Ridgeline to 77 feet east of Ridgeline. Ground Cover area: 27,325 square feet Turf area: 19,334 square feet EN-2 The Metropolitan Water District easement on the south side of Crescents Way from San Marino to Ridgeline. Ground Cover area: 38,104 square feet Turf area: 41,250 square feet EN-3 The Wilson Median from Wardman Bullock to San Sevaine. Ground Cover area: 15,706 square feet EN-4 The Planters on the north side of the drainage easement that is between and parallel to Highland and Arapaho east of Etiwanda Ave. Ground Cover area: 63,972 square feet Landscape Maintenance Distnct No. 7 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2010/11 P-286 EN-5 The south side of Wilson from 1,115 feet west of San Sevaine to 205 feet east of San Sevaine. The Landscape east of San Sevaine from 24th to south end tract. Ground Cover area: 45,584 square feet Turf area: 3,527 square feet EN-6 The north side of Wilson from Wardman Bullock to Ridgeline. The west side of Ridgeline from Wilson to 120 feet north of Arcadia. Ground Cover area: 29,226 square feet Turf area: 15,136 square feet EN-7 The parkway on the eastside of Wardman Bullock from 24th street to 857 feet north of Glendora. The cobblestone between the tract wall and the flood wall will be handled as as extra for debris pickup and weed control on an as needed basis. Ground Cover area: 10,268 square feet EN-8 The south side of Crescenta Way from Ridgeline to Crestline. Ground Cover area: 50,305 square feet Turf area: 35,960 square feet EN-9 The paseo from Meadow Brook to Rock Creek Road. Ground Cover area: 1,400 square feet Turf area: 6,555 square feet EN-10 The paseo from Etiwanda to North Rim Way. The west side of Etiwanda from 175 feet north of North Rim Way to 171 feet south of Golden Prarie Drive. Ground Cover area: 49,020 square feet Turf area: 4,445 square feet EN-11 The paseo south of Ridge Crest Drive to southern boundary of Tract 14139. This site is temporarily maintained by another dontractor and was deleted from the contract as of 7- 16-01, however, this site is still the city's property. Old Ground Cover area:3,548 square feet Old Turt area: 800 square feet EN-12 The cul-de-sac on the north side of Ridgecrest at Etiwanda Creek Channel. Ground Cover ar ea: 1, 870 square feet Turf area: 700 square feet EN-13 The east side of San Sevaine from Wilson to 136 feet north of Crescenta. Ground Cover area: 46,611 square feet Turf area: 5,037 square feet EN-14 The west side of San Sevaine from 150' north of Wilson to 136' north of Crescenta. Ground Cover area: 55,166 square feet Turt area: 235 square feet EN-15 The north side of Youngs Canyon Road from 500 feet east of Koch to 692 feet west of Koch. The south side of Youngs Canyon Road from 349 feet east of Koch to 692 feet west of Koch. The east and west side of Koch place from Youngs Canyon Road to 132 feet north of Youngs Canyon Road. The west side of Koch from Youngs Canyon Road to 132 fee[ south of Youngs Canyon Road. The east side of Koch from 82 feet south of Youngs Canyon Road to Youngs Canyon Road. The trailhead north east of the east end Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2010/11 P-287 of Youngs Canyon Road to the south end of San Sevaine Horse Trail. The south end of San Sevaine Horse from the trail head to 254 feet north of trailhead. Ground Cover area: 42,925 square feet EN-16 The east side of Wardman Bullock from 225 feet south of San Segundo Drive to 80 feet north of Dona Way. Ground Cover area: 2,056 square feet EN-17 The north side of Colonbero from San Sevaine Channel to Guiders Drive. The south side of Colonbero from San Sevaine Channel to 400 feet north of Guidera Drive. The north side of Aggazzotti from Colonbero to 475 feet east of Colonbero. This site has a pump which will be adjusted and maintained by city personnel. Ground Cover area: 43,241 square feet EN-18 The north side of Aggazzotti Road from San Antonio Drive to San Sevaine Road. The west side of San Sevaine road from Aggazzotti to 702 feet south of Aggazzotti. The East side of San Sevaine Road from 702 feet south of Aggazzotti to Regina. Ground Cover area: 47,823 square feet EN-19 The south side of Wilson from Etiwanda to Estates Way. Ground Cover area: 45,727 square feet EN-20 The south side or Wilson from Estates Way to Hanley. Ground Cover area: 14,207 square feet EN-21 The north side of Wilson from Etiwanda to Cervantes. The Wilson median from Etiwanda To Cervantes. The Westside of Etiwanda From Wilson To Del Norte Place. Ground Cover area: 88,795 square feet EN-22 The north and south side of Vintage from 165 feet east of Country View to 338 feet west of Country View. Ground Cover area: 13,603 square feet EN-23 The north side of Wilson and median from Etiwanda west to Etiwanda. The eastside of Etiwanda from Wilson to 1150 feet north of Wilson. Ground Cover area: 32,027 square feet EN-24 The north side of Vintage from 360 feet west of Ascot to 230 feet east of Countrywood. Ground Cover area: 34,707 square feet EN-25 The eastside of Bluegrass from Banyan to 610 feet north of Banyan. Ground Cover area: 4,054 square feet EN-26 The south side of Banyan from Bluegrass to Greenwood. Ground Cover area: 6,240 square feet EN-27 The south side of Banyan from Laurel Blossom to Etiwanda. Ground Cover area: 1,703 square feet EN-28 The north side of Wilson from Cervantes to 1715 feet west of Cervantes. The west side of Cervantes from Carmel Knolls Drive to Wilson. The paseo from Wilson to Tejas Ct. The median on Wilson from Cervantes to Bluegrass. The following temporary landscape: There is 1 planter on the west side of Altura at Tejas. There are five planters on the south side of Tejas from Altura to 195 feet east of Altura. Ground Cover area: 25,046 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2010/11 P-288 EN-30 The east side of Bluegrass Ave from 257 feet south of Churchill Drive to 418 feet north of Churchill Drive. Ground Cover area: 9,303 square feet EN-29 The south side of Banyan from 787 feet west of East Av. to East Av...The west side of East Avenue from Banyan to 600 feet south of Blue Gum. The east side of East Ave. from Banyan to 537 feet south of Banyan. Ground cover area: 16,111 square feet Hardscape area: 15,774 square feet EN-31 The south side of Banyan Ave. from 375 feet south of Cashew Way to Rose Way. The north side of Banyan Ave. from 435 feet west of Peak PI. to Wardman Bullock Rd. Ground cover area: 53,000 square feet Hardscape area: 26,855 square feet EN-32 The landscaping south of the equestrian trail from 21 D feet west of Grovewood PI. to 1,170 feet east of Grovewood PI. Ground cover area: 6,900 square feet EN-33 The north side of Youngs Canyon Rd. from 600 feet east of Banyan Ave. to Banyan Ave. The east side of Wardman Bullock Rd. from Banyan Ave. to Wilson Ave. The south side of YJilson Ave. from Wardman Bullock Rd. to 635 feet east of Fields PI. Ground cover area: 66,601 square feet Hardscape area: 46,332 square feet EN-34 The west side of Wardman Bullock Rd. from Wilson Ave. to Banyan Ave. Parkview Way from Wardman Bullock Rd. to Soledad Way. Ground cover area: 56,314 square feet Hardscape area: 28,428 square feet EN-35 The north side of Day Creek 81vd. from Etiwanda Ave. to Indian Wells Place. Ground cover area: 160,737 square feet Hardscape area: 128,254 square feet EN-36 The south side of Day Creek from 380 feet north of Coyote to Etiwanda. The west side of Etiwanda from Day Creek to 170 feet north of North Rim. The hydro seeded landscape area inside the catch basin on the corner of Day Creek and Etiwanda. The west side of Day Creek from 380 feet north of Coyote to Indian Wells. Ground cover area: 118,699 square feet Hardscape area: 68,127 square feet EN-37 The east side of East Av. from 235 feet south of Hunt Club Dr. to 375 feet north of Hunt Club Dr. Ground cover area: 5,559 square feet Hardscape: 5,231 square feet EN-38 The west side of East Ave. from 236 feet north of Philly Dr. to 245 feet south of Philly Dr. Ground cover area: 4,6D5 square feet Hardscape area: 3,394 square feet Ground cover, shrubs and turf areas that make up parkways, median islands and paseos are maintained under contract by a private landscape maintenance company. Parks are maintained by the City's Park Maintenance Crews. Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2010/11 P-289 Map of Improvements The following page shows the map of landscaping improvements, including irrigation sites and community trails, to be maintained using District funds. Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2010/11 ® } Sw ~ z O 9J r _ ~ ~~ ~a i ~ ~ Ci r m ~ z ¢ x E U ~i ~° w o r y rc d ~ ~o ~ ~ r a m m , ~.\ ~~ o z~ a~~ t s ~ U J ' „ P { _. I r, I~~ it ~ :fm t~iz z ~~~ ~1yr ~ I/y'~~ (y 7W'W ~ I I~ ~~ ~ ~ ~`{~L\fi7`r ~jrl 7~'=wi~~ '~' ~`aw ~rl~ I ~~T~`L -_-__ ~ ,fin' II 1 I~~j.~"' W I %~m1~C ~~~'`~c~+~~~~ z~~',.~..~~''° ~~}~F~-I'-ii ~.r .t W~jS'•+p,,\\ ~ := I {~j~~ ~'w~ li~i:{„~•r~~~'~r~Z ;w lii~w, • f,~ . ,.`~S•~~l - • ~ • ~I i r~ ~ I~ j r~ ~ i Zq'~~ns vwaav ~~'~3~z~ ~rr~tl W \~~ ~ ~' ! ~ ~ ~}'- I j ~~!b ~9i^ . i ..~~.... _. _. r_rrnpwn ', mnmT ~_ _ ~ ~, ~..._. - _ :. y ,F~/ v 1 1 w ! I~n~d y \ -~ r ~I I ~ (I ~ I~ ~~~ ~ - --~ I ~ Ilr~~j~ I ~! I I ~~i~~Er'- _ ~i ~ ~ -~ ¢ ~ t ~ ~; ~~ y l~l I ,` 0 II I -.- I 111{z Z {' I 1 1 I~.;~,I I VI'II' 1 __ ~ L i ~ I _ 1 _ _-i ~ ._ _ ,I_ _ -~ ~i~ ~r inC f ~~ I r i~~~~ j t l i~~l ~$~~; I i I + - ~ ~~ j a 1~• E ; ~ ~~~ '~~ ~'tt7 J,~'r i~.l ~~ E 114 r ,I j _I._..~' ._ _.__ ~ .- _ . .. ~ ___ _._ .'_ I ' ..t~ i. A~_ ~{~~1 ~~ ~~'~~~~ ~i S ` t+ alll_ J'rl r'i i ~ ~il,l '! ~--- ~ ! r ~~-'~ ti t~~ -6-4 ~ f~l~l ~~,~{l~ ~i~l~~ t'l'~~ E~ ~: al :y~: ~ q.. ~ ~ (y~-i`~` ! ~ ', o t ~ ~ w~~~ w;t ary~r~a3h ! ~'_~ p'au~Y/~~~1 w ~~~.~ ,~ Ild, ',' ~'tl~' Iq y Td-iL7 L7 ~ f• ~i ~ 7 / + I ~ ~ 7~L IJ I ~ ~Ir r ~} n rr ~- ~ Zr ~ +. ~j ~y` 1 ~ ~' I+L} f y r'I~L~.l1 !r I +I I I'I'l~ I i ~.'. ~I ~~~r~~ ' r I~ ~ -It ~'i ~~ I~ 1. ~'r ~r~~ 1 .I; '~r,11 .. I 6L r I ~ ~ ill I ,F~~~41}r`w 'Z>~ 1_rLq .'trot ~. J .~'"cs-Fr. I I+ ~~~'nf ~.l-ItR'' ` ~)~C.W cw[tt~'s~"i3 FZ 'I ''.Tj` 4~1ir~~l u•Jj ij[ j-i i, ' ~~ - I~ t k X-1~ ~ 11 / (~ ~ { '~~~I.1~0_ ~ NI ~ ~V1tJ ~ . ~ + I~ + i _.. _. _ _. __. _ _ _. 9 r. '1~~~~r~' 7 ~~W ` .. r l~~`~~~L Wr{~ll_I _ l 3 ~' W~rLFW i~=~~~ J ~ l_~JL~IjItEr~+,~;a},~YS}F~~ i ~f ~ 6~ ~~ ~~lf~~~ ~{ \~yf ,'~•'s t2 Fl .`~~l~~~'~~r+71~ ~ -~ ~~'~y ~+Tl~[~ {.~iJ~i f Iyl-`~~~lCyp~' ~- -I~~ I~hy`~u`, '~ti ~t ~ ~ 1 I~:I l ~ ~ II I IS ~ r ~ ~~ I~ ~~71 i Iy i'~~ !~` t~~r ..~~ r_il~l^*F.t~`~'rn ~~~ _ ~'~ ~ -- t~~l I I ~itt,Ir111y 1~,, r < ~3' ~"=~~ ~ u I Iru I ~;' W t '~ nr~~ V( t t-, I r r rl.l~+[l.u!rw 1710. _I I ~~> v 1 7 i ~ s r. ~. ~~ , a l _ n ,•~ / 7r ~ T ~ y u t Y-~ I I~ ~ ~ i[j ~ ~~'• ry ~/rr I~~ ~~~+I(~. 11~' yl~l I ~~jh)I~'~~A~Qil' {~~ r~ ~ ntt~E~ie7{ N1 .1 1 ~.{ ltF"L~~ l r,~~~1I I~ Itj I7 + I+I ~S+~v-I-I~ E'71 71 j~T+ f?k ~ ~ I I it it !I+-C. +Ug / I~`tG{$r'~f`!II{ISr~y' ii I + I` lu7 rl 'S.frl l.. .l.. .. ~r{~, + ~ T~I~ ~.-_~ ~,lri)'Sili:l ~..r i+r.•:'ViII,_• _- 11~IE'E~Ei €i'Fll .b _, `ttt~E l i~ r ou - "I .. .. 4 ~~IIyE. rf~i~fl~ z$ I ~ ;it;Ellif;ialf~ff ' ,, 1r, P-291 ESTIMATE OF COSTS The estimated costs of administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing the improvements as described in the Plans and Specifications are summarized below. Each year, as part of the assessment district levy calculation process, the costs and expenses are reviewed and the annual costs are projected for the following fiscal year. District Budget Estimated 2010!11 Bud et Personnel Services Re ular Salaries $171,640.00 Part-time Salaries 10 380.00 Frin a Benefits 81 810.00 Subtotal Personnel $263,830.00 O rations and Maintenance O erations and Maintenance $46 660.00 O rations and Maintenance Facilities 1 000.00 Vehicle O erations and Maintenance 2 500.00 Contract Services 299,860.00 Tree Maintenance 6 950.00 Utilities Water Utilities 234 450.00 Electric Utilities 26,790.00 Tele hone 1 530.00 Assessment Administration 15,080.00 General Overhead 56.260.00 Subtotal O erations and Maintenance $693,060.00 Ca ital Ex enditures Ca ital Pro acts O.OD Subtotal Capital Ex enditures $0.00 Total District Ex enditure Bud et $956,910.00 Total Estimated Assessment $841,624.05 Less Anticipated Delinquencies 26 604.05 Total Estimated Revenue $815 020.00 Plus Operating Reserve Fund Contribution 141 890.00 Total Expenditure Budget $956,910.00 Total Estimated Assessment 5841 624.05 Total District EDU Count 2 741.00 Actual Assessment er EDU -Fiscal Year 2010/11 $307.05 Maximum Allowable Assessment er EDU -Fiscal Year 2010/11 $307.05 The maximum allowable assessment per EDU listed in the District budget above, is the amount which was approved in 1996/97 and subsequent District annexations. Each year, prior to the assessments being placed on the tax roll, the City will review the budget and determine the amount needed to landscape Maintenance District No. 7 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 10 Fiscal Year 2010/11 P-292 maintain the improvements for the upcoming fiscal year. The actual assessment per EDU will be based on the estimated costs of maintenance, available fund balance and maximum allowable assessment with the goal of maintaining the improvements in a satisfactory and healthy condition. The actual assessment amount may be lower than the maximum allowable assessment; however it may not exceed the maximum unless the increase is approved by the property owners in accordance with Proposition 218. It is the intent of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to maintain an Operating Reserve which shall not exceed the estimated costs of maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or when the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The reserve balance information for the District is as follows: Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2D10 Reserve Fund Balance 5804,128.02 Operating Reserve Contribution -Fiscal Year 2010/11 (141,890.OD) Operating Reserve Collection -Fiscal Year 2010/11 0.00 Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2071 Reserve Fund Balance 5662,238.02 Definitions of Budget Items The following definitions describe the costs and expenses included in the District Budget: Personnel Services Regular Salaries: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all full-time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Part Time Salaries: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all part time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Fringe Benefits: This item includes the benefits available to City employees: health care, vacation, sick time, and retirement fund. Operations and Maintenance Contract Services: This item includes the contract costs of a landscape maintenance company responsible for the ongoing maintenance of the District improvements. Tree Maintenance: This item includes the contract costs attributed to maintaining the street trees and other Uees throughout the District. Utilities -Water: This item includes the costs to furnish water for the landscaping within the District. Utilities -Electric: This item includes the costs to furnish electricity required for the operation and maintenance of the sprinklers and irrigation controllers. Assessment Administration: This item includes the cost to all particular departments and staff of the City, and consultants for providing the administration, coordination and management of District services, operations, and incidental expenses related to the District. This item also includes creation of an annual engineer's report, resolutions and placing the assessment amounts onto the County tax roll each year, along with responding to any public inquiries and future Proposition 218 balloting proceedings. Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 11 Fiscal Year 2010/11 P-293 General Overhead: This item includes the costs of all departments and staff of the City for providing the coordination of District services, inspections, annual bid management, responding to public concerns, public education, accounting, auditing and procedural matters associated with the District. This item also includes an allocation for general City staff time for administrative functions and systems that provide for a functional and operational assessment district within the City's administrative structure. Capital Expenditures: Canital Protects: This item includes new improvements to further enhance the level and quality of service provided within the boundaries of the District. This may include new monuments, irrigation systems, and other large improvements. Operating Reserve Collection: Operating Reserve Collection: This item includes the amount to be collected to maintain reserves to enable the City to pay for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or whenever the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The Reserve Fund contribution will continue until such a time the Reserve Fund balance is approximately one half of the annual costs. The fund may be allowed to accumulate in anticipation of any unforeseen expenses not included in the yearly maintenance costs. This may include, but is not limited to, tree replacements, repair of damaged equipment due to vandalism, storms and other similar events. Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 12 Fiscal Year 2010/11 P-294 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT General Pursuant to the 1972 Act and Article XIIID, all parcels that have a special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements and services shall be identified, and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel shall be determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of improvements. The 1972 Act, permits the establishment of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include the operation, maintenance and servicing of landscaping improvements. Section 22573 of the 1972 Act requires that maintenance assessments must be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. This Section states: "The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district maybe apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimafed benefit to be received by each such lot or paroel from the improvements." The determination of whether or not a lot or parcel will benefit from the improvements shall be made pursuant to the Improvement Act of 1911 (Division 7 (commencing with Section 5000) (of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California)." The 1972 Act also permits the designation of zones of benefit within any individual assessment district if "by reasons or variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive different degrees of benefit from the improvement' (Sec. 22547). Article XIIID, Section 4(a) of the California Constitution limits the amount of any assessment to the proportional special benefit conferred on the property. Article XIIID also provides that publicly owned properties must be assessed unless there is clear and convincing evidence that those properties receive no special benefit from the assessment. Exempted from the assessment would be the areas of public streets, public avenues, public lanes, public roads, public drives, public courts, public alleys, public easements and rights-of-ways, public greenbelts and public parkways. The net amount to be assessed may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels. Proposition 218, approved by the voters in November 1996, requires the City to separate general benefit from special benefit, where only special benefit is assessed. Benefit The maintenance and servicing of the improvements within the District (which are described in the Description of Services and Improvements Section of this report) are for the benefit of the properties within the District, and as such confer a special and direct benefit to parcels within the District by: • improving the livability, appearance, and desirability for properties within the boundaries of the District, and • ensuring that improvements do not reach a state of deterioration or disrepair so as to be materially detrimental to properties within the District, and Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 13 Fiscal Year 2010/11 P-295 • providing beautification, shade and overall enhancement to properties within the District. The above mentioned items affect the assessed property in a way that is particular and distinct from their effect on other parcels and that real property in general and the public at large do-not share. They contribute to a specific enhancement of the properties within the District. Since these improvements, including the community trails, were installed and are maintained specifically for the properties within the District; only properties within the District receive a special benefit and are assessed for said maintenance. General Benefit In addition to the special benefits received by parcels within the District, there are derivative general benefits that are conferred on parcels outside the boundaries of the District which include: • the control of dust and insect infestations, and • the visual enhancement of the area to persons or vehicles that may travel through the District. However it has been determined that these benefits are derivative and do not provide a direct benefit to parcels outside of the district that are not being assessed. Method of Assessment Each of the parcels within the District is deemed to receive special benefit from the improvements. Each parcel that has a special benefit conferred upon it as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements are identified and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel is determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of the improvements. When the District was formed in 1989, Article XIIID and Proposition 218 had not yet been passed. Upon the passage of Article XIIID and the subsequent passage of the Proposition Omnibus Implementation Act, new rules were put into place. Due to the changes in legal requirements, as property annexed to the District after the passage of the Assessment Law, the description of the method of assessment became more refined, however, the assessment per parcel has remained the same since the 1996!97 Fiscal Year. Further, no parcel included in the District formation or annexations prior to when the language was refined, are now being levied differently than they were at the time the District was formed or the parcels were annexed. To assess special benefit appropriately, it is necessary to relate the different type of parcel improvements to each other. The Equivalent Dwelling Unit ("EDU") method of apportionment uses the single family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single family home equals one Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU). Every other land-use is converted to EDUs based on an assessment formula that equates to the property's specific development status, type of development (land-use), and size of the property, as compared to a single family home. Vacant parcels are assigned an EDU value of 0.25 per acre because they receive a lesser benefit from the improvements until such time as development occurs. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land-use types, as assigned by County use code, to determine each parcel's EDU assignment. Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 14 Fiscal Year 2010/11 P-296 Land-Use E uivalent Dwellin Units Pro e T e Coun Use Code EDU Value Multi lier Single Family Residential 1.00 Dwelling Unit The use of the latest County Assessor's Secured Roll shall be the basis for the Property Type determination and unitslacreage assignments, unless better data is available to the City. In addition, if any parcel within the District is identified by the County AuditorlController to be an invalid parcel number for the current fiscal year, the Property Type and EDU assignment shall be based on the correct parcel number and/or new parcel number(s) County use code and subsequent property information. If a single parcel has changed to multiple parcels, the EDU assignment and assessment amount applied to each of the new parcels will be recalculated rather than spread the proportionate share of the original assessment. The following fable summarizes the Fiscal Year 2010/11 maximum allowable assessment rates for the District: Maximum Allowable Property Type (County Assessment Rate Actual Assessment Total Total Use Code) er EDU Rate per EDU Units/Acres EDUs Single Family Residential $307.05 $307.05 2,741 2,741 The total amount of maintenance and incidental costs for maintaining the landscaping and community trail improvements is assessed to the individual parcels of real property within the District in proportion to the special benefit received by such parcels of real property. The proposed individual assessments are shown on the assessment roll in this report. Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 15 Fiscal Year 2010111 P-297 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM An Assessment Diagram for the District is shown on the following page. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the County Assessor of the County San Bernardino, at the time this report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Engineer's Report. Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 16 Fiscal Year 2010/11 ~b.+ ~~ ,v~w, 4 V A~ W sir .~ G3 h J ny ua~{IIIiW ny uaneH ny esow~aH nb' Pleq!4o~t/ ny uewllaH ny 1~~a4~ N C J I. J Q ~ = U d ~ ~~ J ~ r • m ~ 3 0 i° Q nb' lse3 in r-caa h a~ ~ ~ T T u~ 0 0 N O nd ePU2M11~ ,. __, r. ny ~a~sauoo~ ny ua~lll!W ny uaneH ny esow~aH i ny PleCi!4~~`d . R ._ _._ _ i _ .-• w"ny uewllaH .. ~~'~,. /t•. ~ v ny p e~(auin ~g uellawe~ _i L S N_ _ .. •~'' cn .~' ~ ,.._ ~.. ~ ~ ~ ~ a~ ~ c '~ c~ m ~ m ~ cn = 3 s ~ ~ o m m ti Q ~~ e} ~s~ €E P-299 ASSESSMENT ROLL Assessment Roll The assessment roll is a listing of the assessment for Fiscal Year 2010111 apportioned to each lot or parcel, as shown on the last equalized roll of the Assessor of the County of San Bernardino. The following tables summarize the Fiscal Year 2010/11 maximum and actual assessments for the District: Maximum Allowable Maximum Property Type (County Assessment Rate Total Total Allowable Use Code er EDU Units/Acres EDUs Assessment Single Family Residential $307.05 2,741 2,741 $841,624.05 Actual Property Type (County Assessment Rate Total Total Actual Use Code er EDU Units/Acres EDUs Assessment Single Family Residential $307 ~5 2,741 2,741 $8t"1 X24.05 A copy of the full assessment roll is available for review in the City Clerk's office. Annexations There were no annexations effective for the 2010/11 Fiscal Year: Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 17 Fiscal Year 2010/11 P-300 Revised Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2010/2011 City of Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance ®istrict No. 8 (South Etiwanda) P-301 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 8 (SOUTH ETIWANDA) 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Phone: 909.477.2740 Fax: 909.477.2741 CITY COUNCIL Donald J. Kurth, Mayor L. Dennis Michael, Mayor Pro Tem Rex Gutierrez, Council Member Sam Spagnolo, Council Member Diane Williams, Council Member CITY STAFF John R. Gillison, Assistant City Manager Linda D. Daniels, Deputy City Manager William Wittkopf, Public Works Director Jeff Barnes, Park and Landscape Superintendent Ingrid Y. Bruce, GIS/Special Districts Manager Christopher Bopko, Management Analyst III P-302 TABLE OF CONTENTS ENGINEER'S LETTER INTRODUCTION 1 3 Reason for Assessment .............................................................................................3 Process for Annual Assessment .................................................................................3 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS 5 Description of the Boundaries of the District ...............................................................5 Description of Improvements and Services ................................................................5 Map of Improvements .................................................................................................6 ESTIMATE OF COSTS ~ District Budget ............................................................................................................7 Definitions of Budget Items .........................................................................................8 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT 10 General .....................................................................................................................10 Special Benefit .........................................................................................................10 General Benefit ........................................................................................................11 Method of Assessment Spread ................................................................................11 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM ASSESSMENT ROLL 13 14 Assessment Re!1 .......................................................................................................14 Annexations ..............................................................................................................14 P-303 ENGINEER'S LETTER WHEREAS, on ,the City Council, under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 (the "1972 Act") adopied its Resolution No. _, a Resolution Initiating Proceedings for the Levy of Annual Assessments for Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 (South Etiwanda); and WHEREAS, the Resolution Initiating Proceedings directed NBS to prepare and file an Engineer's Report for Fiscal Year 2010/11 pursuant to the requirements of the 1972 Act. The Engineers Report presents the plans and specifications describing the general nature, location and extent of the improvements to be maintained, an estimate of the costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements for the District for the referenced fiscal year, a diagram for the District, showing the area and properties proposed to be assessed, and an assessment of the estimated costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing the improvements, assessing the net amount upon all assessable Tots and/or parcels within the District in proportion to the special benefit received; and NOW THEREFORE, the following assessment is proposed to be authorized in order to pay the estimated costs of maintenance, operation and servicing of the improvements to be paid by the assessable real property within the boundaries of the District in proportion to the special benefit received. The following table summarizes the proposed assessment. SUMMARY OF ASSESSMENT Fiscal Year 2010111 Total Estimated Assessment $28 624.05 Less Anticipated Delinquencies 1 114.05 Total Estimated Revenue $27,510.D0 Plus Reserve Fund Contribution 6 130.00 Total Expenditure Budget $21,380.00 Total District EDU Count 189.00 Actual Assessment per EDU $151.45 Maximum Allowable Assessment per EDU $151.45 In making the assessments contained herein pursuant to the 1972 Act: I have identified all parcels which will have a special benefit conferred upon them from the improvements described in the Special Benefit Section of this Engineer's Report (the "Specialty Benefited Parcels"). For particulars as to the identification of said parcels, reference is made to the Assessment Diagram, a copy of which is iricluded in this Engineer's Report. 2. I have evaluated the costs and expenses of the improvements upon the Specially Benefited Parcels. In making such evaluation: a. The proportionate special benefit derived by each Specially Benefited Parcel from the improvements was determined in relationship to the entirety of the maintenance costs of the improvements; Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2010/11 P-304 b. No assessment has been imposed on any Specially Benefited Parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on such parcel from the improvements; and c. Any general benefits from the improvements have been separated from the special benefits and only special benefits have been assessed. I, the undersigned, respectfully submit the enclosed Engineer's Report and, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, the Engineer's Report, Assessments, and the Assessment Diagram herein have been prepared and computed in accordance with the order of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the 1972 Act, Article XIII D of the Constitution of the State of California ("Article XIII D") and the Proposition 218 Omnibus Implementation Act ("Proposition 218"), (the 1972 Act, Article XIII D and Proposition 218 are collectively referred to as the "Assessment LaW'). Mark A Steuer, City Engineer Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2010/11 P-305 INTRODUCTION Reason for Assessment Approval of the assessment covered by this Engineer's Report will generate the revenue necessary to: Provide for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements described in this Engineer's Report. Maintenance may include but is not limited to, all of the following: the repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement, providing for the life, growth, health and beauty of the landscaping, including cultivation, irrigation, trimming, spraying, fertilizing or treating for disease or injury, the removal of trimming, rubbish, debris and other solid waste, the maintenance, repair and replacement as necessary of all irrigation systems and the removal of graffiti from walls immediately adjacent to the cultivated areas. Servicing means the furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operating and servicing of any improvement. Servicing shall also include vehicle, equipment, capital improvements and administrative costs associated with the annual administration and operation of the District. Process for Annual Assessment The City cannot levy and collect annual assessments within the District without complying with the procedures specified in the 1972 Act. On an annual basis, an Engineer's Report must be prepared which contains a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the district. The City Council must also adopt a resolution of intention which: • Declares the intention of the City Council to levy and collect assessments within the assessment district for the fiscal year stated therein. • Generally describes the existing and proposed improvements and any substantial changes proposed to be made in existing improvements. • Refers to the assessment district by its distinctive designation and indicate the general location of the district. • Refers to the report of the engineer, on file with the clerk, for a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the district. • Gives notice of the time and place for public hearing by the City Council on the levy of the proposed assessment. • States whether the assessment is proposed to increase from the previous year. If the assessments are to 6e levied in the same or lesser amounts than the maximum assessment amount approved, the clerk shall give notice by causing the resolution of intention to be published. Any interested person may, prior to the conclusion of the public hearing, file a written protest which shall state all grounds of objection. The protest shall contain a description sufficient to identify the property owned by the property owner filing the protest. During the course or upon conclusion of the hearing, the City Council may order changes in any of the matters provided in the report,' including changes in the improvements, any zones within the assessment district, and the proposed diagram or the proposed assessment. Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2010/11 P-306 The City Council, upon conclusion of the public hearing must then adopt a resolution confirming the diagram and assessment, either as originally proposed or as changed by it. The adoption of the resolution shall constitute the levy of an assessment for the fiscal year referred to in the assessment. If the assessment to be levied exceeds the maximum assessment amount previously approved, the City must comply with the procedures specified in Article XIII D and Proposition 218. The voters in the State of California in November 1996 added Article XIII D to the California Constitution imposing, among other requirements, the necessity for the City to conduct an assessment ballot procedure to enable the owners of each property on which assessments are proposed to be enacted or increased, the opportunity to express their support for, or opposition to the proposed assessment or increase in such assessment. The basic steps of the assessment ballot procedure are outlined below. The City must prepare a Notice of Public Hearing ("Notice"), which describes, along with other mandated information, the reason for the proposed assessments, and to provide a date and time of a public hearing to be held on the matter. The City must also prepare an assessment ballot, which clearly gives the property owner the ability to sign and mark their assessment ballot either in favor of, or in opposition to the proposed assessment. The Notice and assessment ballot are mailed to each affected property owner within the District a minimum of 45 days prior to the public hearing date as shown in the Notice. The City may also hold community meetings with the property owners to discuss the issues facing the District and to answer property owner questions directly. After the Notice and assessment ballat are mailed, property owners are given until the close of the public hearing, stated in the Notice, to return their signed and marked assessment ballot. During the public hearing, property owners are given the opportunity to address the City Council and ask questions or voice their concerns. At the public hearing, the returned assessment ballots received prior to the close of the public hearing are tabulated, weighted by the proposed assessment amount on each property and the results are announced by the City Council. - Article XIII D provides that if, as a result of the assessment ballot proceeding, a majority protest is found to exist, the City Council shall not have the authority to levy and collect the assessments as proposed. A majority protest exists if the assessments represented by ballots submitted in opposition exceed those submitted in favor of the assessment. All returned ballots are tabulated and weighted according to the financial obligation of each particular parcel. If there is no majority protest as described above, the City Council may approve the proposed assessments. If there is a majority protest, as described above, the City will not levy and collect any assessments. Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2010111 P-307 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS The District provides for the administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing of various improvements located within the public right-of-way and dedicated easements within the boundaries of the District. Description of the Boundaries of the District The District is located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California. The boundaries of the District are generally described as that area known as South Etiwanda, which is south of the I-210 Freeway along Fisher Drive, east of East Avenue, including the south side of Highstone Manor Court, the south side of Smokestone Street, and to the San Bernardino County Flood Control drainage basin on east side. Typically parcels have been annexed to the District as they have developed. Reference is also made to the Assessment Diagram included in this Report. Description of Improvements and Services The improvements are the maintenance and servicing of landscaping sites and appurtenant facilities throughout the District. The various landscaping sites that are maintained consist of parkways, median islands, street trees, paseos and community trails located within street right-of-ways and dedicated public easements which are within the boundaries of the District. The landscaping maintenance includes, but is not limited to, shrubs, turf, tree trimming in irrigated City parkways and paseos, weed and pest control, landscape irrigation systems and testing, trash, debris and graffiti removal, and associated appurtenant facilities. Services include personnel, materials, contracting services, utilities, and all necessary costs associated with the maintenance, replacement and repair required to keep the improvements in a healthy, vigorous and satisfactory condition. In addition, it is the City's intention to continue to use cost effective materials, including the future ability to replace landscaping with drought resistant or low water use plants, in order to lower expenses of the District. The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows: Site # Descriotive Location SE-1 The east side of East Ave. from 480 feet south of Catalpa St. to 182 feet north of Catalpa St. The north and south side of Catalpa St, from East Ave. to Brownstone PI. Ground Cover area: 10,355 square feet Turf area: 6,258 square feet Hardscape area: 4,050 square feet SE-2 The south side of Fisher Dr. from 361 feet east of East Ave. to 210 feet east of Starstone PI. Ground Cover area: 9,366 square feet Hardscape area: 4,074 square feet SE-3 The south side of Fisher Dr. from 860 feet west of Mulberry St, to Mulberry St. Ground Cover area: 3,676 square feet Hardscape area: 6,910 square feet Total Ground Cover: 23,397 square feet Total Turf: 6,258 square feet Total Hardscape: 15,034 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Prepared by NBS -Fiscal Year 2010!11 P-308 Ground cover, shrubs and turt areas that make up parkways, median islands and paseos are maintained under contract by a private landscape maintenance company. Parks are maintained by the City's Park Maintenance Crews Map of Improvements The following page shows the map of landscaping improvements, including irrigation sites and community trails, to be maintained using Distr9ct funds. Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 6 Prepared by NBS -Fiscal Year 2010/11 y~'1~ ~8 ~ ~, 'fib;`~1, ry ( ~~ dpdb itl'oSAbM33byr`y W ~' ZI ~ i i I ~ .._ L 1 .. ". ._... i ~ '~% W EGG~ESTGNE VI. ~. "~~.~ r i 1 ...__~.. _; _.. - ~ t i i i 1 I ~ "i i I. .... .- ~ w ._. `-1 ' .:a i i N m c v d o ~ Z' ~ ~ c 0 O U m N ~ Q ~ m ~ ® ~ I ~! ~.._.,._i.. f... .................. I ... i i i .... _. ~ I . ( _ i ~,.. r .. .~ ?~.,.J ~ '~ ~ i I ... ~11 i.! ~~ !~ !'. .~ ~~4I'"I~I~rI~ i P-370 ESTIMATE OF COSTS The estimated costs of administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing the improvements as described in the Plans and Specifications are summarized below. Each year, as part of the assessment district levy calculation process, the costs and expenses are reviewed and the annual costs are projected for the following fiscal year. District Estimated 2010/11 Budget Personnel Services Regular Salades $0.00 Part-time Salades 0.00 Fringe Benefits 0=~ Subtotal Personnel $0.00 Operations and Maintenance Operations and Maintenance $0.00 Emergency Equipment and Vehicle Rental 0.00 Contract Services 8,350.00 Tree Maintenance 4,300.00 Utilities Water Utilities 4,410.00 Electric Utilities 1,310.00 Assessment Administration 1,040.00 General Overhead 1 970.00 Subtotal Operations and Maintenance $21,380.00 Capital Expenditures Capital Projects $0.00 Subtotal Capital Expenditures $0.00 Total District Expenditure Budget $21,380.00 Total Estimated Assessment $28,624.05 Less Anticipated Delinquenaes 1 114.05 Total Estimated Revenue $27,510.00 Less Operating Reserve Fund Collection 6 130.00 Total Expenditure Budget $21,380.00 Total Estimated Assessment $28,624.05 Total District EDU Count 189.00 Actual Assessment per EDU -Fiscal Year 2010/11 $151.45 The maximum allowable assessment per EDU listed in the District budget above, is the amount which was approved in 1989/90, when the District was formed, and subsequent District annexations. Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Prepared by NBS -Fiscal Year 2010/11 P-311 Each year, prior to the assessments being placed on the tax roll, the City will review the budget and determine the amount needed to maintain the improvements for the upcoming fiscal year. The actual assessment per EDU will be based on the estimated costs of maintenance, available fund balance and maximum allowable assessment with the goal of maintaining the improvements in a satisfactory and healthy condition. The actual assessment amount may be lower than the maximum allowable assessment; however it may not exceed the maximum unless the increase is approved by the property owners in accordance with Proposition 218. It is the intent of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to maintain an Operating Reserve which shall not exceed the estimated costs of maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or when the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The reserve balance information for the District is as follows: Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2010 Reserve Fund Balance $21,928.69 Operating Reserve Contdbution -Fiscal Year 2010/11 0.00 Operating Reserve Collection -Fiscal Year 2010!11 6 130.00 Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2011 Reserve Fund Balance $28,058.69 Definitions of Budget Items The following definitions describe the costs and expenses included in the District Budget: Operations and Maintenance Contract Services: This item includes the contract costs of a landscape maintenance company responsible for the ongoing maintenance of the District improvements. Tree Maintenance: This item includes the contract costs attributed to maintaining the street trees and other trees throughout the District. Utilities -Water: This item includes the costs to fumish water for the landscaping within the District. Utilities -Electric: This item includes the costs to furnish electricity required for the operation and maintenance of the sprinklers and irrigation controllers. Assessment Administration: This item includes the cost to ail particular departments and staff of the City, and consultants for providing the administration, coordination and management of District services, operations, and incidental expenses related to the District. This item also includes creation of an annual engineer's report, resolutions and placing the assessment amounts onto the County tax roll each year, along with responding to any public inquiries and future Proposition 218 balloting proceedings. General Overhead: This item includes the costs of all departments and staff of the City for providing the coordination of District services, inspections, annual bid management, responding to public concerns, public education, accounting, auditing and procedural matters associated with the District. This item also includes an allocation for general City staff time for administrative functions and systems that provide for a functional and operational assessment district within the City's administrative structure. Capital Expenditures: Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Prepared by NBS -Fiscal Year 2010/11 P-312 Capital Projects: This item includes new improvements to further enhance the level and quality of service provided within the boundaries of the District. This may include new monuments, irrigation systems, and other large improvements. Operating Reserve Collection: Ooerating Reserve Collection: This item includes the amount to be coliected to maintain reserves to enable the City to pay for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or whenever the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The Reserve Fund contribution will continue until such a time the Reserve Fund balance is approximately one half of the annual costs. The fund may be allowed to accumulate in anticipation of any unforeseen expenses not included in the yearly maintenance costs. This may include, but is not limited to, tree replacements, repair of damaged equipment due to vandalism, storms and other similar events. Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Prepared by NBS -Fiscal Year 2D10/11 P-313 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT General Pursuant to the 1972 Act and Article Xiil D, all parcels that have a special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements and services shall be identified, and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel shall be determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of improvements. The 1972 Act, permits the establishment of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include the operation, maintenance and servicing of landscaping improvements. Section 22573 of the 1972 Act requires that maintenance assessments must be levied according to benent rather than according to assessed value. This Section states: "The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district maybe apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements." The dstarminaticn of whether or not a lot or parcel will benefit from the improvements shall be made pursuant to the Improvement Act of 1911 (Division 7 (commencing with Section 5000) (of the Streets and Highways Code, State ofCalifomiaJ." The 1972 Act also permits the designation of zones of benefit within any individual assessment district if "by reasons or variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive different degrees of benefit from the improvement" (Sec. 22547). Article XIII D, Section 4(a) of 4he California Constitution limits the amount of any assessment to the proportional special benefit conferred on the property. Article XIII D also provides that publicly owned properties must be assessed unless there is clear and convincing evidence that those properties receive no special benefit from the assessment. Exempted from the assessment would be the areas of public streets, public avenues, public lanes, public roads, public drives, public courts, public alleys, public easements and rights-of-ways, public greenbelts and public parkways. The net amount to be assessed may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels. Proposition 216, approved by the voters in November 1996, requires the City to separate general benefit from special benefit, where only special benefit is assessed. Benefit The maintenance and servicing of the improvements within the District (which are described in the Description of Services and Improvements Section of this report) are for the benefit of the properties within the District, and as such confer a special and direct benefit to parcels within the District by: • improving the livability, appearance, and desirability for properties within the boundaries of the District, and • ensuring that improvements do not reach a state of deterioration or disrepair so as to be materially detrimental to properties within the District, and Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 10 Prepared by NBS -Fiscal Year 2010/11 P-314 • providing beautification, shade and overall enhancement to properties within the District. The above mentioned items affect the assessed properly in a way that is particular and distinct from their effect on other parcels and that real property in general and the public at large do not share. They contribute to a specific enhancement of the properties within the District. Since these improvements, including the community trails, were installed and are maintained specifically for the properties within the District; only properties within the District receive a special benefit and are assessed for said maintenance. genera/Benefit In addition to the special benefits received by parcels within the District, there are derivative general benefits that are conferred on parcels outside the boundaries of the District which include: • the control of dust and insect infestations, and • the visual enhancement of the area to persons or vehicles that may travel through the District. However it has been determined that these benefits are derivative and do not provide a direct benefit tc parcels outside of the district that are not being assessed. Method of Assessmenf Spread Each of the parcels within the District is deemed to receive special benefit from the improvements. Each parcel that has a special benefit conferred upon it as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements are identified and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel is determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of the improvements. To assess special benefit appropriately, it is necessary to relate the different type of parcel improvements to each other. The Equivalent Dwelling Unit ("EDU") method of apportionment uses the single family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single family home equals one Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU). Every other land-use is converted to EDUs based on an assessment formula that equates to the property's specific development status, type of development (land-use), and size of the property, as compared to a single family home. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land-use types, as assigned by County use code, to determine each parcel's EDU assignment. Land-Use E uivalent Dwellin Units Pro e T e Coun Use Code EDU Value Multi tier Single Family Residential 1.00 Dwelling Unil The use of the latest County Assessor's Secured Roll shall be the basis for the Property Type determination and units/acreage assignments, unless better data is available to the City. In addition, if any parcel within the District is identifed by the County Auditor/Controller to be an invalid parcel number for the current fiscal year, the Property Type and EDU assignment shall be based on the corcect parcel number and/or new parcel number(s) County use code and subsequent property information. If a single parcel has changed to multiple parcels, the EDU assignment and assessment amount applied to each of the new parcels will be recalculated rather than spread the proportionate share of the original assessment. Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 11 Prepared by NBS -Fiscal Year 2010!11 P-315 The following table summarizes the Fiscal Year 2010111 maximum allowable assessment rates for the District: Maximum Allowable Property Type (County Assessment Rate Actual Assessment Total Total Use Code) er EDU Rate per EDU UnitslAcres EDUs Single Family Residential $151.45 $151.45 189.OD 189.00 The total amount of maintenance and incidental costs for maintaining the landscaping and community trail improvements is assessed to the individual parcels of real property within the District in proportion to the special benefit received by such parcels of real property. The proposed individual assessments are shown on the assessment roll in this report. Landscape Maintenance District No. 6 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 12 Prepared by NBS -Fiscal Year 2010!11 P-316 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM An Assessment Diagram for the District is shown on the following page. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the County Assessor of the County San Bernardino, at the time this report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Engineer's Report. Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 13 Prepared by NBS -Fiscal Year 2010/11 00 w v .~ C ^~ W C ., ny ua~lll!W ny c 0 N ny ~a;sayooa ny A~ay~ a d C J d] ~ ~ s 3 m o 0 a0 ~ eZa l L Q i <. ' ~ ' ~ ,.. ..... ;... -~. ......... 1 J Q ~ U ~ 1 J ^~ ny lse3 in ~~ ® N 0 0 N O L v _.._.._.. 5 ny epuenv;3 e 0 i n e any ~a;sayoo~ ,' ,..3 e . _..- ..._.._ ~ ..... ........ _ o ny ua~!II!W i ~ ~ {«~.. .° ._ ~.. _... ~• ~ t~.. ~_ .. .. _:-•ti.: ....1.....: ny anal ` '.~ ~ c ~ ~ ....~...E~. .~.s..~. .~' .~ _ m y y t o ao D ~ ~ ~ m lL Q N ~ G y ~_ N m oa ~~ a ~ f } ~J ~aai~ Xea P-318 ASSESSMENT ROLL Assessment Roll The assessment roll is a listing of the assessment for Fiscal Year 2010111 apportioned to each lot or parcel, as shown on the last equalized roll of the Assessor of the County of San Bernardino. The following tables summarize the Fiscal Year 2010/11 maximum and actual assessments for the District: Maximum Allowable Maximum Property Type (County Assessment Rate Total Total Allowable Use Code er EDU Units/Acres EDUs Assessment Single Family Residential $151.45 189.00 189.00 $28,624.05 Actual Property Type (County Assessment Rate Total Total Actual Use Code er EDU Units/Acres EDUs Assessment Single Family Residential $151.45 189.00 189.00 $28,624.05 A copy of the full assessment rcil is available for review in the City Clerk's office. Annexations The following annexations are effective for the 2010/11 Fiscal Year: Assessor's Parcel Annexation Total Total Property Type Number Date Pro ect UnitslAcres EDUs Coun Use Code) 0228-011-31, 5/6!2009 DRC2003-00048 13.61 0.00 Vacant 0228-011-38 --_ Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 14 Prepared by NBS -Fiscal Year 2010/11 P-319 Revised Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2010/2011 City of Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 (Lower Etiwanda) P-320 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 9 (LOWER ETIWANDA) 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Phone: 909.477.2740 Fax: 909.477.2741 CITY COUNCIL Donald J. Kurth, Mayor L. Dennis Michael, Mayor Pro Tem Rex Gutierrez, Council Member Sam Spagnolo, Council Member Diane Williams, Council Member CITY STAFF John R. Gillison, Assistant City Manager Linda D. Daniels, Deputy City Manager William Wittkopf, Public Works Director Jeff Barnes, Park and Landscape Superintendent Ingrid Y. Bruce, GIS/Special Districts Manager Christopher Bopko, Management Analyst III P-321 TABLE OF CONTENTS ENGINEER'S LETTER INTRODUCTION 7 3 Reason for Assessment ..............................................................................................3 Process for Annual Assessment .................................................................................3 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS 5 Description of the Boundaries of the District ...............................................................5 Description of Improvements and Services ................................................................5 Map of Improvements .................................................................................................7 ESTIMATE OF COSTS 8 District Budget ............................................................................................................8 Definitions of Budget Items .........................................................................................9 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT 11 General ..........:..........................................................................................................11 Special Benefit .........................................................................................................11 General Benefit ........................................................................................................12 Method of Assessment Spread ................................................................................12 Maximum and Historical Assessments .....................................................................13 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM ASSESSMENT ROLL 75 16 Assessment Roll .......................................................................................................16 Annexations ..............................................................................................................16 P-322 ENGINEER'S LETTER WHEREAS, on _, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga (the "City"), under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 (the "1972 Act") adopted its Resolution No. _, a Resolution Initiating Proceedings for the Levy of Annual Assessments for Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 (Lower Etiwanda) (the "District"); and WHEREAS, the Resolution Initiating Proceedings directed NBS to prepare and file an Engineer's Report for Fiscal Year 2010!11 pursuant to the requirements of the 1972 Act. The Engineer s Report presents the plans and specifications describing the general nature, location and extent of the improvements to be maintained, an estimate of the costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements for the District for the referenced fiscal year, a diagram for the District, showing the area and properties proposed to be assessed, and an assessment of the estimated costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing the improvements, assessing the net amount upon all assessable lots and/or parcels within the District in proportion to the special benefit received; and NOW THEREFORE, the following assessment is proposed to be authorized in order to pay the estimated costs of maintenance, operation and servicing of the improvements to be paid by the assessable real property within the boundaries of the District in proportion to the special benefit received. The following table summarizes the proposed assessment. SUMMARY OF ASSESSMENT Fiscal Year 2010111 Total Estimated Assessment $793,701.96 Less Anticipated Delinquency 18 361.96 Total Estimated Revenue $775,340.00 Less Reserve Fund Collection 322 110.00 Total Expenditure Budget $453,230.00 Total District EDU Count 2,045.94 Actual Assessment per EDU 8367.94 Maximum Allowable Assessment per EDU $501.55 In making the assessments contained herein pursuant to the 1972 Act: I have identified all parcels which will have a special benefit conferred upon them from the improvements described in the Special Benefit Section of this Engineer's Report (the "Specially Benefited Parcels"). For particulars as to the identification of said parcels, reference is made to the Assessment Diagram, a copy of which is included in this Engineer's Report. 2. I have evaluated the costs and expenses of the improvements upon the Specially Benefited Parcels. In making such evaluation: a. The proportionate special benefit derived by each Specially Benefited Parcel from the improvements was determined in relationship to the entirety of the maintenance costs of the improvements; Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2010/11 P-323 b. No assessment has been imposed on any Specially Benefited Parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on such parcel from the improvements; and c. Any general benefits from the improvements have been separated from the special benefits and only special benefits have been assessed: I, the undersigned, respectfully submit the enclosed Engineer's Report and, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, the Engineer's Report, Assessments, and the Assessment Diagram herein have been prepared and computed in accordance with the order of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the 1972 Act, Article XIII D of the Constitution of the State of California ("Article XIII D") and the Proposition 218 Omnibus Implementation Act ("Proposition 218"), (the 1972 Act, Article XIII D and Proposition 218 are collectively referred to as the "Assessment Law"). Mark P.. Steuer, Ci±y Engineer Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2010/11 P-324 INTRODUCTION Reason for Assessment Approval of the assessment covered by this Engineer's Report will generate the revenue necessary to: Provide for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements described in this Engineer's Report. Maintenance may include but is not limited to, all of the following: the repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement, providing for the life, growth, health and beauty of the landscaping, including cultivation, irrigation, trimming, spraying, fertilizing or treating for disease or injury, the removal of trimming, rubbish, debris and other solid waste, the maintenance, repair and replacement as necessary of all irrigation systems and the removal of graffiti from walls immediately adjacent to the cultivated areas. Servicing means the furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operating and servicing of any improvement. Servicing shall also include vehicle, equipment, capital improvements and administrative costs associated with the annual administration and operation of the District. Process for Annual Assessment The City cannot levy and collect annual assessments within the District without complying with the procedures specified in the 1972 Act. On an annual basis, an Engineer's Report must be prepared which contains a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the district. The City Council must also adopt a resolution of intention which: • Declares the intention of the City Council to levy and collect assessments within the assessment district for the fiscal year stated therein. • Generally describes the existing and proposed improvements and any substantial changes proposed to be made in existing improvements. • Refers to the assessment district by its distinctive designation and indicate the general location of the district. • Refers to the report of the engineer, on file with the clerk, for a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the district. • Gives notice of the time and place for public hearing by the City Council on the levy of the proposed assessment. • States whether the assessment is proposed to increase from the previous year. If the assessments are to be levied in the same or lesser amounts than the maximum assessment amount approved, the clerk shall give notice by causing the resolution of intention to be published. Any interested person may, prior to the conclusion of the hearing, file a written protest which shall state all grounds of objection. The protest shall contain a description sufficient to identify the property owned by the property owner filing the protest. During the course or upon conclusion of the public hearing, the City Council may order changes in any of the matters provided in the report, including changes in the improvements, any zones within the assessment district, and the proposed diagram or the proposed assessment. The City Council, upon conclusion of the public hearing must then adopt a resolution confirming the diagram and assessment, either as originally proposed or as changed by it. The adoption of the resolution shall constitute the levy of an assessment for the fiscal year referred to in the assessment. Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2010111 P-325 If the assessment to be levied exceeds the maximum assessment amount previously approved, the City must comply with the procedures specified in Article XIII D and Proposition 218. The voters in the State of California in November 1996 added Article XIII D to the California Constitution imposing, among other requirements, the necessity for the City to conduct an assessment ballot procedure to enable the owners of each property on which assessments are proposed to be enacted or increased, the opportunity to express their support for, or opposition to the proposed assessment or increase in such assessment. The basic steps of the assessment ballot procedure are outlined below. The City must prepare a Notice of Public Hearing ("Notice'), which describes, along with other mandated information, the reason for the proposed assessments, and to provide a date and time of a public hearing to be held on the matter. The City must also prepare an assessment ballot, which clearly gives the property owner the ability to sign and mark their assessment ballot either in favor of, or in opposition to the proposed assessment. The Notice and assessment ballot are mailed to each affected property owner within the District a minimum of 45 days prior to the public hearing date as shown in the Notice. The City may also hold community meetings with the property owners to discuss the issues facing the District and to answer property owner questions directly. After the Notice and assessment ballot are mailed, property owners are given until the close of the public hearing, stated in the Notice, to return their signed and marked assessment ballot. During the public hearing, property owners are given the opportunity to address the City Council and ask questions or vcice their concerns. At the public hearing, the returned assessment ballots received prior to the close of the public hearing are tabulated, weighted by the proposed assessment amount on each property and the results are announced by the City Council. Article XIII D provides that if, as a result of the assessment ballot proceeding, a majority protest is found to exist, the City Council shall not have the authority to levy and collect the assessments as proposed. A majority protest exists if the assessments represented by ballots submitted in opposition exceed those submitted in favor of the assessment. All returned ballots are tabulated and weighted according to the financial obligation of each particular parcel. If there is no majority protest as described above, the City Council may approve the proposed assessments. If there is a majority protest, as described above, the City will not levy and collect any assessments. Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2010111 P-326 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS The District provides for the administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing of various improvements located within the public right-of-way and dedicated easements within the boundaries of the District. Description of the Boundaries of the District The District is located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California. The boundaries of the District are generally described as that area known as Lower Etiwanda, which south of Victoria Street, north of Foothill Boulevard, generally east of.Etiwanda Avenue and the I-15 freeway and west of East Avenue. Typically parcels have been annexed to the District as they have developed. Reference is also made to the Assessment Diagram included in this Report. Description of Improvements and Services The improvements are the maintenance and servicing of landscaping sites and appurtenant facilities throughout the District. The various landscaping sites that are maintained consist of parkways, median islands, street trees, paseos and community trails located within street right-of-ways and dedicated public easements which are within the boundaries of the District. The landscaping maintenance includes, but is not limited to, shrubs, turf, tree trimming in irrigated City parkways and paseos, weed and pest control, landscape irrigation systems and testing, trash, debris and graffiti removal, and associated appurtenant facilities. Services include personnel, materials, contracting services, utilities, and all necessary cosfs associated with the maintenance, replacement and repair required to keep the improvements in a healthy, vigorous and satisfactory condition. In addition, it is the City's intention to continue to use cost effective materials, including the future ability to replace landscaping with drought resistant or low water use plants, in order to lower expenses of the District. The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows: Parks: Garcia Park (formerly known as South Etiwanda Park) Site # Descriptive Location 9-1-1 The west side of East Ave. from 380 feet north of Chateau to 290 feet south of Chateau. Ground Cover area: 4,426 square feet Hardscape area: 7,360 square feet 9-2 The west side of East Ave. from 339 feet north of Brookfield to 157 feet north of Brookfield. Brookfield from East Ave. to Oak Crest. The east side of Oak Crest to 137 feet north of Brookfield. Ground Cover area: 2,390 square feet Hardscape area: 6,874 square feet 9-3 The west side of East Ave. from 790 feet north of Highfield to 256 feet south of Highfield. Ground Cover area: 8,769 square feet Hardscape area: 10,669 square feet 9-4 The west side of East Ave. From 295 feet north of Via Veneto To Via Veneto. The north side of Via Veneto From East Ave to Dolcetto. The east side of Dolcetto from Via Veneto to Miller Ave. The south side of Miller Ave from 372 feet west of Dolcetto to 240 feet east Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2010/11 P-327 of Dolcetto. The west side of Dolcetto from Miller to Garcia. The north side of Garcia from Dolcetto to Etiwanda Ave. Ground Cover area: 48,612 square feet Hardscape area: 28,746 square feet 9-5 The north side of Miller from 429 feet west of Dolcetto to 1029 feet west of Dolcetto Ground Cover area: 6,519 square feet Hardscape area: 3,325 square feet 9-6 The north side of Miller From 254 feet east of Dolcetto to 167 feet west of Dolcetto. Ground Cover area: 4,089 square feet Hardscape area: 2,854 square feet 9-7 The south side of Lima, from 167 feet west of Brisas, to Green Glen. Ground Cover area: 2,580 square feet Hardscape area: 0 square feet 9-8 The south side of Baseline from Etiwanda Av. to Shelby. The Baseline median from Etiwanda to 473 feet east of Shelby. Ground cover area: 16,395 square feet Hardscape area: 10,275 square feet 9-9 The north side of Candlewood St from Exbury St to Etiwanda Avenue. Ground Cover area: 3,362 square feet Hardscape area: 786 square feet 9-10 The north side of Baseline from 522 feet east of Forester to 160 feet west of Forester. The Baseline median from 503 feet east of Forester to 200 feet west of Forester. Ground cover area: 16,930 square feet Hardscape area: 13,600 square feet 9-11 The north side of Mueller Ct. from 40 feet past the east end of Mueller Ct. to 20 feet east of Dicarlo PI. Ground cover area: 9,420 square feet Hardscape area: 742 square feet 9-12 The north and south sides of Highland Av. from 217 feet west of Norcia Dr. to 210 feet east of Dicarlo PI. Ground cover area: 12,471 square feet Hardscape area: 14,445 square feet 9-13 The south side of Carnesi Dr. from Etiwanda Av. to 395 feet east of Murietta Ct. Ground cover area: 8,919 square feet Hardscape area: 6,203 square feet FH-17 The Foothill Blvd. median from Etiwanda Av. to Cornwell Av. Ground cover area: 8,275 square feet Ground cover, shrubs and turf areas that make up parkways, median islands and paseos are maintained under contract by a private landscape maintenance company. Parks are maintained by the City's Park Maintenance Crews Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 6 Fiscal Year 2010111 P-328 Map of Improvements The following page shows the map of landscaping improvements, including irrigation sites and community trails, to be maintained using District funds. Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2010/11 P-330 ESTIMATE OF COSTS The estimated costs of administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing the improvements as described in the Plans and Specifications are summarized below. Each year, as part of the assessment district levy calculation process, the costs and expenses are reviewed and the annual costs are projected for the following fiscal year. District Budget Estimated 2010/11 Bud et Personnel Services Re ular Salaries $144,680.00 Parl-tirrie Salaries 7 860.00 Frin a Benefits 66 860.00 Subtotal Personnel $221 400.00 O erations and 6"aintenance 0 erations and Maintenance $14 350.00 Emer en E ui ment and VehiGe Rental 200.00 Contrail Services 66 890.00 Tree Maintenance 6,600.00 Utilities Water Utilities 24,700.00 Electric Utlities 5,530.00 Assessment Administration 8,750.00 General Overhead 54 810.00 Subtotal O rations and Maintenance $181,630.00 Ca ital Ex enditures Ca ital Pro ects 50 000.00 Subtotal Ca ital Ez enditures $50,000.00 Total District Ex enditure Bud et $453 230.00 Tofal Estimated Assessment $793 T01.96 Less Anticipated Delinquency 18 361.96 Total Estimated Revenue $775,340.00 Less O erating Reserve Fund Collection 322 110.00 Total Expenditure Budget $453,230.00 Total Estimated Assessment $793 701.96 Total District EDU Count 2045.94 Actual Assessment er EDU -Fiscal Year 2010/11 $387.94 Maximum Allowable Assessment er EDU -Fiscal Year 2010/11 $501.55 Each year, prior to the assessments being placed on the tax roll, the City will review the budget and determine the amount needed to maintain the improvements for the upcoming fiscal year. The actual assessment per EDU will be based on the estimated costs of maintenance, available fund balance and maximum allowable assessment with the goal of maintaining the improvements in a satisfactory Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2010111 P-331 and healthy condition. The actual assessment amount may be lower than the maximum allowable assessment; however it may not exceed the maximum unless the increase is approved by the property owners in accordance with Proposition 218. It is the intent of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to maintain an Operating Reserve which shall not exceed the estimated costs of maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or when the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The reserve balance information for the District is as follows: Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2070 Reserve Fund Balance 52,397,115.56 Operating Reserve Contribution -Fiscal Year 2010111 0.00 Operating Reserve Collection -Fiscal Year 2010/11 322 110.00 Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2011 Reserve Fund Balance 52,719,225.56 Definitions of Budget Items The following definitions describe the costs and expenses included in the District Budget Personnel Services Regular Salaries: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all full-time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Part Time Salaries: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all part time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Fringe Benefits: This item includes the benefits available to City employees: health care, vacation, sick time, and retirement fund. Operations and Maintenance Contract Services: This item includes the contract costs of a landscape maintenance company responsible for the ongoing maintenance of the District improvements. Tree Maintenance: This item includes the contract costs attributed to maintaining the street trees and other trees throughout the District. Utilities -Water: This item includes the costs to furnish water for the landscaping within the District. Utilities -Electric: This item includes the costs to furnish electricity required for the operation and maintenance of the sprinklers and irrigation controllers. Assessment Administration: This item includes the cost to all particular departments and staff of the City, and consultants for providing the administration, coordination and management of District services, operations, and incidental expenses related to the District. This item also includes creation of an annual engineer's report, resolutions and placing the assessment amounts onto the County tax roll each year, along with responding to any public inquiries and future Proposition 218 balloting proceedings. General Overhead: This item includes the costs of all departments and staff of the City for providing the coordination of District services, inspections, annual bid management, responding to public concerns, public education, accounting, auditing and procedural matters associated with the District. This item also includes an allocation for general City staff time for administrative functions and Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscai Year 2010!11 P-332 systems that provide for a functional and operational assessment district within the City's administrative structure. Capital Expenditures: Capital Projects: This item includes new improvements to further enhance the level and quality of service provided within the boundaries of the District. This may include new monuments, irrigation systems, and other large improvements. Operating Reserve Collection: Operating Reserve Collection: This item includes the amount to be collected to maintain reserves to enable the City to pay for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or whenever the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The Reserve Fund contribution will continue until such a time the Reserve Fund balance is approximately one half of the annual costs. The fund may be allowed to accumulate in anticipation of any unforeseen expenses not included in the yearly maintenance costs. This may include, but is not limited to, tree replacements, repair of damaged equipment due to vandalism, storms and other similar events. Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 10 Fiscal Year 2010/11 P-333 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT General Pursuant to the 1972 Act and Article XIII D, all parcels that have a special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements and services shall be identified, and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel shall be determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of improvements. The 1972 Act, permits the establishment of assessment districts far the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include the operation, maintenance and servicing of landscaping improvements. Section 22573 of the 1972 Act requires that maintenance assessments must be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. This Section states: 'The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district maybe apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in propoRion to the estimated benefrt to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements." The determination of whether or not a lot or parcel wiU benefit from the improvements shall be made pursuant to the Improvement Act of 1911 (Division 7 (commencing with Section 5000) (of the Streets and .Highways Code, State of Califomiai." The 1972 Act also permits the designation of zones of benefit within any individual assessment district if "by reasons or variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive different degrees of benefit from the improvement" (Sec. 22547). Article XIII D, Sec[ion 4(a) of the California Constitution limits the amount of any assessment to the proportional special benefit conferred on the property. Article XIII D also provides that publicly owned properties must be assessed unless there is clear and convincing evidence that those properties receive no special benefit from the assessment. Exempted from the assessment would be the areas of public streets, public avenues, public lanes, public roads, public drives, public courts, public alleys, public easements and rights-of-ways, public greenbelts and public parkways. The net amount to be assessed may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels. Proposition 218, approved by the voters in November 1996, requires the City to separate general benefit from special benefit, where only special benefit is assessed. Benefit The maintenance and servicing of the improvements within the District (which are described in the Description of Improvements and Services Section of this report) are for the benefit of the properties within the District, and as such confer a special and direct benefit to parcels within the District by: • improving the livability, appearance, and desirability for properties within the boundaries of the District, and • ensuring that improvements do not reach a state of deterioration or disrepair so as to be materially detrimental to properties within the District, and Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 11 Fiscal Year 2010/11 P-334 providing beautification, shade and overall enhancement to properties within the District. " The above mentioned items affect the assessed property in a way that is particular and distinct from their effect on other parcels and that real property in general and the public at large do not share. They contribute to a specific enhancement of the properties within the District. Since these improvements, including the community trails, were installed and are maintained specifically for the properties within the District; only properties within the District receive a special benefit and are assessed for said maintenance. General Benefit In addition to the special benefits received by parcels within the District, there are derivative general benefits that are conferred on parcels outside the boundaries of the District which include: • the control of dust and insect infestations, and • the visual enhancement of the area to persons or vehicles that may travel through the District. However it has been determined that these benefits are derivative and do not provide a direct benefit to parcels outside of the district that are not being assessed. Method of Assessment Each of the parcels within the District is deemed to receive special benefit from the improvements. Each parcel that has a special benefit conferred upon it as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements are identified and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel is determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of the improvements. To assess special benefit appropriately, it is necessary to relate the different type of parcel improvements to each other. The Equivalent Dwelling Unit ("EDU") method of apportionment uses the single family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single family home equals one Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU). Every other land-use is converted to EDUs based on an assessment formula that equates to the property's specific development status, type of development (land-use), and size of the property, as compared to a single family home. The - following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land-use types, as assigned by County use code, to determine each parcel's EDU assignment. Land-Use Equivalent Dwelling Units Pro ert T e Coun Use Code EDU Value Multi lier Single Family Residential .1.00 Dwelling Unit Multi-Family Residential 1.OD Dwelling Unit Non-Residential Improved 2.00 Acre Vacant Property 0.25 Acre The use of the latest County Assessor's Secured Roll shall be the basis for the Property Type determination and units/acreage assignments, unless better data is available to the City. In addition, if any parcel within the District is identifed by the County Auditor/Controller to be an invalid parcel number for the current fiscal year, the Property Type and EDU assignment shall be based on the Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 12 Fiscal Year 2010/11 P-335 correct parcel number and/or new parcel number(s) County use code and subsequent property information. If a single parcel has changed to multiple parcels, the EDU assignment and assessment amount applied to each of the new parcels will be recalculated rather than spread the proportionate share of the original assessment. The following table summarizes the Fiscal Year 2010/11 maximum allowable assessment rates for the District: Property Type (County Use Code) Maximum Allowable Assessment Rate er EDU Actual Assessment Rate er EDU Total UnitslAcres Total EDUs Single Family Residential $496.55 $387.94 1,573.00 1,573.00 Multi-Family Residential 496.55 387.94 420.00 420.00 Non-Residentiallmproved 496.55 387.94 26.47 52.94 Vacant Property 496.55 387.94 0.00 0.00 The total amount of maintenance and incidental costs for maintaining the landscaping and community trail improvements is assessed to the individual parcels of real property within the District in proportion to the special benefit received by such parcels of real property. The proposed individual assessments are shown on the assessment roll in this report. Maximum and Historical Assessmenfs The maximum allowable assessment per EDU listed in the District budget above, is the amount which was approved in 20D0/01, when the District was formed, and subsequent District annexations. Commencing in Fiscal Year 2001/02, the amount of the maximum allowable assessment is proposed to increase each year based upon the Consumer Price Index ("CPI"), All Urban Consumers, for the Los Angeles-Anaheim-San Bernardino Area, as determined by the United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics or its successor. Each year the percentage difference between the CPI for March of each year and the CPI for the previous March shall be computed. The assessment shall be adjusted by an amount not to exceed such percentage for the following fiscal year. Should the Bureau of Labor Statistics revise such index or discontinue preparation of such index, the revised index or a comparable system as approved by the City Council shall be used for determining fluctuations in the cost of living. Historical maximum assessment amounts and actual assessment amounts are shown in the table below: Fiscal Year Maximum Assessment er EDU Actual Assessment er EDU 2000/01 $375. 91 $375 .91 2001/02 388. 02 375 .91 2002/03 398. 81 375 .91 2003/04 414. 44 375 .91 2004/05 421. 71 375 .91 2005/06 438. 67 375 .91 2006/07 459. 15 375 .91 2007/08 476. 76 387 .94 2008/09 492. 41 387 .94 2009110 487. 50 387 .94 2010/11 496. 55 387 .94 Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 - Ciry of Rancho Cucamonga 13 Fiscal Year 2D10/11 P-336 Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 14 Fiscal Year 2010/11 P-337 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM An Assessment Diagram for the District is shown on the following page. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the County Assessor of the County San Bernardino, at the time this report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Engineer's Report. Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 15 Fiscal Year 2010/11 vs v .~ *r O ^_ W `1~1 .C c~ C Q V e o a ~ ~.... _ ~' O !.... •' ~ J ~ m ny ~aaa~ Kea ny ~aisayooa nyua~!II!W ~~.._.._.._.._.._-_._..._....-.1 i i `~ ny uaneH ~ ............. t i ny esow~aH i - _ __ ..-.-~ _-..1.......~ . f nV PIe9!4o~F/ ! .......... .. _ ............. i i ~~ ny uewllaH i _. ~...-._~ .... . . ........... i I 3S ue!!awe~ ~ ..... .i .... _ ._.. ~ ~ -- u~.- a_ c N m ~z a~ ny l~ay~ m L `o 0 u_ 3 0 ¢` N J Q C V ~l J tir i i ~ ~ .. m_. ~.._..~ • ny anaS r ~ = 3 m N L O of N CO LL ~~ ^~ oua 0 N O a P-339 ASSESSMENT ROLL Assessment Roll The assessment roll is a listing of the assessment for Fiscal Year 2010/11 apportioned to each lot or parcel, as shown on the last equalized roil of the Assessor of the County of San Bernardino. The following tables summarize the Fiscal Year 2010111 maximum and actual assessments for the District: Property Type (County Use Code Maximum Allowable Assessment Rate er EDU Total UnitslAcres Total EDUs Maximum Allowable Assessment Single Family Residential $501.55 1,573.00 1,573.00 $788,938.15 Multi-Family Residential 501.55 420.00 420.00 210,651.00 Non-ResidenGallmproved 501.55 26.47 52.94 26,552.05 Vacant Property 501.55 0.00 O.OD 0.00 TOTALS 2,019.47 2,045.94 $1,026,141.20 Property Type (County Use Code Actual Assessment Rate er EDU Total UnitslAcres Total EDUs Actua! Assessment Single Family Residential $387.94 1,573.00 1,573.00 $610,229.62 Multi-Family Residential 387.94 420.00 420.00 162,934.80 Non-Residential Improved 387.94 26.47 52.94 20,537.54 Vacant Property 387.94 0.00 0.00 0.00 T07ALS 2,019.47 2,045.94 $793,701.96 A copy of the full assessment roll is available for review in the City Clerk's office. Annexations There were no annexations effective for the 2010!11 Fiscal Year: Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 16 Fiscal Year 2010/11 P-340 Revised Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2010/2011 City of Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 (South Etiwanda) P-341 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. B (SOUTH ETIWANDA) 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Phone: 909.477.2740 Fax: 909.477.2741 CITY COUNCIL Donald J. Kurth, Mayor L. Dennis Michael, Mayor Pro Tem Rex Gutierrez, Council Member Sam Spagnolo, Council Member Diane Williams, Council Member CITY STAFF John R. Gillison, Assistant City Manager Linda D. Daniels, Deputy City Manager William Wittkopf, Public Works Director Jeff Barnes, Park and Landscape Superintendent Ingrid Y. Bruce, GIS/Special Districts Manager Christopher Bopko, Management Analyst III P-342 TABLE OF CONTENTS ENGINEER'S LETTER INTRODUCTION 1 3 Reason for Assessment .............................................................................................3 Process for Annual Assessment .................................................................................3 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS 5 Description of the Boundaries of the District ...............................................................5 Description of Improvements and Services ................................................................5 Map of Improvements .................................................................................................6 ESTIMATE OF COSTS ~ District Budget ............................................................................................................7 Definitions of Budget Items .........................................................................................8 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT 10 General .....................................................................................................................10 Special Benefit .........................................................................................................10 General Benefit ........................................................................................................11 Method of Assessment Spread ................................................................................11 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM ASSESSMENT ROLL 13 14 Assessment Rol1 .......................................................................................................14 Annexations ..............................................................................................................14 P-343 ENGINEER'S LETTER WHEREAS, on ,the City Council, under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 (the "1972 Act") adopted its Resolution No. _, a Resolution Initiating Proceedings for the Levy of Annual Assessments for Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 (South Etiwanda); and WHEREAS, the Resolution Initiating Proceedings directed NBS to prepare and file an Engineers Report for Fiscal Year 2010/11 pursuant to the requirements of the 1972 Act. The Engineer's Report presents the plans and specifications describing the general nature, location and extent of the improvements to be maintained, an estimate of the costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements for the District for the referenced fiscal year, a diagram for the District, showing the area and properties proposed to be assessed, and an assessment of the estimated costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing the improvements, assessing the net amount upon all assessable lots and/or parcels within the District in proportion to the special benefit received; and NOW THEREFORE, the following assessment is proposed to be authorized in order to pay the estimated costs of maintenance, operation and servicing of the improvements to be paid by the assessable real property within the boundaries of the District in proportion to the special benefit received. The following table summarizes the proposed assessment. SUMMARY OF ASSESSMENT Fiscal Year 2010/11 Total Estimated Assessment $28,624.05 Less Anticipated Delinquencies 1 114.05 Total Estimated Revenue $27,510.00 Plus Reserve Fund Contribution 6 130.00 Total Expenditure Budget $21,380.00 Total District EDU Count 189.00 Actual Assessment per EDU $151.45 Maximum Allowable Assessment per EDU $151.45 In making the assessments contained herein pursuant to the 1972 Act: I have identified all parcels which will have a special benefit conferred upon them from the improvements described in the Special Benefit Section of this Engineer's Report (the "Specially Benefited Parcels"). For particulars as to the identification of said parcels, reference is made to the Assessment Diagram, a copy of which is iricluded in this Engineer's Report. 2. I have evaluated the costs and expenses of the improvements upon the Specially Benefited Parcels. In making such evaluation: a. The proportionate special benefit derived by each Specially Benefited Parcel from the improvements was determined in relationship to the entirety of the maintenance costs of the improvements; Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2010111 P-344 b. No assessment has been imposed on any Specially Benefited Parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on such parcel from the improvements; and c. Any general benefits from the improvements have been separated from the special benefits and only special benefits have been assessed. 1, the undersigned, respectfully submit the enclosed Engineer's Report and, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, the Engineer's Report, Assessments, and the Assessment Diagram herein have been prepared and computed in accordance with the order of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the 1972 Act, Article XIII D of the Constitution of the State of California ("Article XIII D") and the Proposition 218 Omnibus Implementation Act ("Proposition 218"), (the 1972 Act, Article XIII D and Proposition 218 are collectively referred to as the °Assessment Law"). Mark A Steuer, City Engineer Landscape Mainfenance District No. 8 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2010/11 P-345 INTRODUCTION Reason for Assessment Approval of the assessment covered by this Engineer's Report will generate the revenue necessary to: Provide for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements described in this Engineer's Report. Maintenance may include but is not limited to, all of the following: the repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement, providing for the life, growth, health and beauty of the landscaping, including cultivation, irrigation, trimming, spraying, fertilizing or treating for disease or injury, the removal of trimming, rubbish, debris and other solid waste, the maintenance, repair and repiacement as necessary of all irrigation systems and the removal of graffiti from walls immediately adjacent to the cultivated areas. Servicing mea,^.s ±he furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operating and servicing of any improvement. Servicing shat) also include vehicle, equipment, capital improvements and administrative costs associated with the annual administration and operation of the District. Process for Annual Assessmenf The City cannot levy and collect annual assessments within the District without complying with the procedures specified in the 1972 Act. On an annual basis, an Engineer's Report must be prepared which contains a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the district. The City Council must also adopt a resolution of intentionwhich: • Declares the intention of the City Council to levy and collect assessments within the assessment district for the fiscal year stated therein. • Generally describes the existing and proposed improvements and any substantial changes proposed to be made in existing improvements. • Refers to the assessment district by its distinctive designation and indicate the general location of the district. • Refers to the report of the engineer, on file with the clerk, for a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the district. • Gives notice of the time and place for public hearing by the City Council on the levy of the proposed assessment. • States whether the assessment is proposed to increase from the previous year. If the assessments are to be levied in the same or lesser amounts than the maximum assessment amount approved, the clerk shall give notice by causing the resolution of intention to be published. Any interested person may, prior to the conclusion of the public hearing, file a written protest which shall state all grounds of objection. The protest shall contain a description sufficient to identify the property owned by the property owner filing the protest. During the course or upon conclusion of the hearing, the City Council may order changes in any of the matters provided in the report,' including changes in the improvements, any zones within the assessment district, and the proposed diagram or the proposed assessment. Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2010111 P-346 The City Council, upon conclusion of the public hearing must then adopt a resolution confirming the diagram and assessment, either as originally proposed or as changed by it. The adoption of the resolution shall constitute the levy of an assessment for the fiscal year referred to in the assessment. If the assessment to be levied exceeds the maximum assessment amount previously approved, the City must comply with the procedures specified in Article XIII D and Proposition 218. The voters in the State of California in November 1996 added Article XIII D to the California Constitution imposing, among other requirements, the necessity for the City to conduct an assessment ballot procedure to enable the owners of each property on which assessments are proposed to be enacted or increased, the opportunity to express their support for, or opposition to the proposed assessment or increase in such assessment. The basic steps of the assessment ballot procedure are outlined below. The City must prepare a Notice of Public Hearing ("Notice"), which describes, along with other mandated information, the reason for the proposed assessments, and to provide a date and time of a public hearing to be held on the matter. The City must also prepare an assessment ballot, which clearly gives the property owner the ability to sign and mark their assessment ballot either in favor of, or in opposition to the proposed assessment. The Notice and assessment ballot are mailed to each affected property owner within the District a minimum of 45 days prior to the public hearing date as shown in the Notice. The City may also hold community meetings with the property owners to discuss the issues facing the District and to answer property owner questions directly. After the Notice ar~d assessment ballot are mailed, property owners are given until the close of the public hearing, stated in the Notice, to return their signed and marked assessment ballot. During the public hearing, property owners are given the opportunity to address the City Council and ask questions or voice their concerns. At the public hearing, the returned assessment ballots received prior to the close of the public hearing are tabulated, weighted by the proposed assessment amount on each property and the results are announced by the City Council. Article XIII D provides that if, as a result of the assessment ballot proceeding, a majority protest is found to exist, the City Council shall not have the authority to levy and collect the assessments as proposed. A majority protest exists if the assessments represented by ballots submitted in opposition exceed those submitted in favor of the assessment. All returned ballots are tabulated and weighted according to the financial obligation of each particular parcel. If there is no majority protest as described above, the City Council may approve the proposed assessments. If there is a majority protest, as described above, the City will not levy and collect any assessments. Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2010111 P-347 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS The District provides for the administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing of various improvements located within the public right-of-way and dedicated easements within the boundaries of the District. Description of the Boundaries of the District The District is located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California. The boundaries of the District are generally described as that area known as South Etiwanda, which is south of the I-210 Freeway along Fisher Drive, east of East Avenue, including the south side of Highstone Manor Court, the south side of Smokestone Street, and to the San Bernardino County Flood Control drainage basin on east side. Typically parcels have been annexed to the District as they have developed. Reference is also made to the Assessment Diagram included in this Report. Description of Improvements and Services The improvements are the maintenance and servicing of landscaping sites and appurtena~~t facilities throughout the District. The various landscaping sites that are maintained consist of parkways, median islands, street trees, paseos and community trails located within street right-of-ways and dedicated public easements which are within the boundaries of the District..The landscaping maintenance includes, but is not limited to, shrubs, turf, tree trimming in irrigated City parkways and paseos, weed and pest control, landscape irrigation systems and testing, trash, debris and graffiti removal, and associated appurtenant facilities. Services include personnel, materials, contracting services, utilities, and all necessary costs associated with the maintenance, replacement and repair required to keep the improvements in a healthy, vigorous and satisfactory condition. In addition, it is the City's intention to continue to use cost effective materials, including the future ability to replace landscaping with drought resistant or low water use plants, in order to lower expenses of the District. The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows: Site # Descriptive Location SE-1 The east side of East Ave. from 480 feet south of Catalpa St. to 182 feet north of Catalpa St. The north and south side of Catalpa St. from East Ave. to Brownstone PI. Ground Cover area: 10,355 square feet Turf area: 6,258 square feet Hardscape area: 4,050 square feet SE-2 The south side of Fisher Dr. from 361 feet east of East Ave. to 210 feet east of Starstone PI. Ground Cover area: 9,366 square feet Hardscape area: 4,074 square feet SE-3 The south side of Fisher Dr. from 860 feet west of Mulberry St. to Mulberry St. Ground Cover area: 3,676 square Feet Hardscape area: 6,910 square feet Total Ground Cover: 23,397 square feet Total Turf: 6,258 square feet Total Hardscape: 15,034 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Prepared by NBS -Fiscal Year 2010/11 P-348 Ground cover, shrubs and turt areas that make up parkways, median islands and paseos are maintained under contract by a private landscape maintenance company. Parks are maintained by the City's Park Maintenance Crews Map of Improvements The following page shows the map of landscaping improvements, including irrigation sites and community trails, to be maintained using District funds. Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Prepared by NBS -Fiscal Year 2010/11 v a RR `~ C ,' ~ ~ 'Y ~~;4i-.. O ~ C " a o \ F ti~, ~ O U m Hf '7 , ~O ~H..~ N m ~ 'O ~ `« kkk ` y ; 1 yy myyy r M ' ~ 4+ ~ , ff'. 1 G ~ ' + rf 33b ' I ~ , "- yrr, r ~; I ~I, d• i,. 'h , ~ ~ N 'r I ~'' +. , .n~ i o O I Ic c' ( i ~, w' ___ -. .~ ~ OJ ~ ~s 1 ; . ^^ H l Q ~ I ~..-; ; ~n >~ o ~' ~ Ri ~ ~ -' I 1 I ~ ~, I _ i ~ JO,RREY PINE CT /~~ / I~• ~ ! r V/ ., O [m_ I: MULBERRY $i i i __ I _ .__...... _._.. _ ._-___ _ ...... ....... _ .. ...i ....... fl. h C W /~~ y /w~~, W I S+ ~ ,.i ~ _.. -"V ( .w ..W I I i r ^ ` ~ O ~ k ~~ f _„ 24 I .- W N ~ {~ Y ~ i f i W - - Y O a`' , 5 W r 1 _. I i ~ ~ ~ ,.., ~ _ `-- V ~ ~p I _.., f ... _ _ _ r ~ ~~ ~ 4 '" r (d' I (a ~ ~ ~ _.I '~ ~ '~i. ~ I ~~ wI- _~ ~ ~ ~t" I i " \ ~3 i ~ -~ i -v --^ ~ II' F v ' v ' I ~ w~ I i + l J~ r IN QNE PL _~. § ~ $TAR$ :...,... ._.. _ - _ ...... __.- -_ . ............_ S '". ~ J ~ 1~ r W i ~: I I i I ail{ ~. . ~ , .. ~ _ i I~ ~ ~ . I I . I . ' I~ L ~ I I , I ;. F _ Y 1 __ I _ ~. I II F6PC+$T ~ I ~~_ I I i i i I : + i f A -_ ~ I 1 ~ ~ ~ w ~ _ ._... ~ ' I ~ I ~ i .. L I" ~ j I EGG4E$TONi P4 w, _ w .. o' .., r ~ ~ I _ ._ I I 7 ~ ' ~ ' ' I ~ _ a ~,a ~... o _ i ~ i _ I I ~ li._ ~ ' ~ ~ 4 I ~ ~i ~ i i I ~ '' ~ ' ' r _-~- EAST AV ' 9 I EpST`AV .._r -r __ .._ -_ 1 _ - - I( s I _ . ~ a ~ i ... I i ~ it f+ ~ l , x, t .If°~ ~_~ +i ~.If . ... .. I i i I P-350 ESTIMATE OF COSTS The estimated costs of administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing the improvements as described in the Plans and Specifications are summarized below. Each year, as part of the assessment district levy calculation process, the costs and expenses are reviewed and the annual costs are projected for the following fiscal year. District Budget -- Estimated 2010111 Budget Personnel Services Regular Salaries $0.00 Part-time Salaries 0.00 Fringe 8eneflts 0.00 Subtotal Personnel $0.00 Operations and t'laintenance Operations and Maintenance $0.00 Emergency Equipment and Vehicle Rental 0.00 Contract Services 6,350.00 Tree Maintenance 4,300.00 Utilities Water Utilities 4,410.00 Electric Utilities 1,310.00 Assessment Administration 1,040.00 General Overhead 1 970.00 Subtotal Operations and Maintenance $21,380.00 Capital Expenditures Caoital Projects $0.00 Subtotal Capital Expenditures $0.00 Total District Expenditure Eudget $21,380.00 Total Estimated Assessment $28,624.05 Less Anticipated Delinquencies 1 1(' 14'051 Total Estimated Revenue $27,510.00 Less Operating Reserve Fund Collection 6 130.D0 Total Expenditure Budget $21,360.00 Total Estimated Assessment $28,624.05 Total District EDU Count 189.00 Actual Assessment per EDU -Fiscal Year 2010/11 $151.45 Maximum Allowable Assessment er EDU -Fiscal Year 2010/11 $151.45 The maximum allowable assessment per EDU listed in the District budget above, is the amount which was approved in 1989!90, when the District was formed, and subsequent District annexations. Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Prepared by NBS -Fiscal Year 2010/11 P-351 Each year, prior to the assessments being placed on the tax roll, the City will review the budget and determine the amount needed to maintain the improvements for the upcoming fiscal year. The actual assessment per EDU will be based on the estimated costs of maintenance, available fund balance and maximum allowable assessment with the goal of maintaining the improvements in a satisfactory and healthy condition. The actual assessment amount may be lower than the maximum allowable assessment; however it may not exceed the maximum unless the increase is approved by the property owners in accordance with Proposition 218. It is the intent of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to maintain an Operating Reserve which shall not exceed the estimated costs of maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or when the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The reserve balance information for the District is as follows: Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2010 Reserve Fund Balance $21,928.69 Operating Reserve Contribution -Fiscal Year 2010/11 0.00 Operating Reserve Collection -Fiscal Year 2010/11 6 130.00 Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 20ii Reserve Fund Balance $28,068.69 Defin!tiores cf Budget !te.~ns The following definitions describe the costs and expenses included in the District Budget: Operations and Maintenance Contract Services: This item includes the contract costs of a landscape maintenance company responsible for the ongoing maintenance of the District improvements. Tree Maintenance: This item includes the contract costs attributed to maintaining the street trees and other trees throughout the District. Utilities -Water: This item includes the costs to furnish water for the landscaping within the District. Utilities -Electric: This item includes the costs to furnish electricity required for the operation and maintenance of the sprinklers and irrigation controllers. Rssessment Administration: This item includes the cost to all particular departments and staff of the City, and consultants for providing the administration, coordination and management of District services, operations, and incidental expenses related to the District. This item also includes creation of an annual engineer's report, resolutions and placing the assessment amounts onto the County tax roll each year, along with responding to any public inquiries and future Proposition 218 balloting proceedings. General Overhead: This item includes the costs of all departments and staff of the City for providing the coordination of District services, inspections, annual bid management, responding to public concerns, public education, accounting, auditing and procedural matters associated with the District. This item also includes an allocation for general City staff time for administrative functions and systems that provide for a functional and operational assessment district within the City's administrative structure. Capital Expenditures: Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Prepared by NBS -Fiscal Year 2010!11 P-352 Capital Projects: This item includes new improvements to further enhance the level and quality of service provided within the boundaries of the District. This may include new monuments, irrigation systems, and other large improvements. Operating Reserve Collection: Ooeratino Reserve Collection: This item includes the amount to be collected to maintain reserves to enable the City to pay for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or whenever the City expects to receive ils apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The Reserve Fund contribution will continue until such a time the Reserve Fund balance is approximately one half of the annual costs. The fund may be allowed to accumulate in anticipation of any unforeseen expenses not included in the yearly maintenance costs. This may include, but is not limited to, tree replacements, repair of damaged equipment due to vandalism, storms and other similar events. Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Prepared by NBS -Fiscal Year 2010!11 P-353 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT Genera! Pursuant to the 1972 Act and Article XIII D, all parcels that have a special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements and services shall be identified, . and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel shall be determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of improvements. The 1972 Act, permits the establishment of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include the operation, maintenance and servicing of landscaping improvements. Section 22573 of the 1972 Act requires that maintenance assessments must be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. This Section states: "The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district maybe apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by each such lot or paroel from the improvements." The determination of whether or not a lot or parcel will benefit f, ©,m the improvements shall be made pursuant to the ImprovementAct of 1911 (Division 7 (commencing with Section 5000) /of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California]." The 1972 Act also permits the designation of zones of benefit within any individual assessment district if "by reasons or variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive different degrees of benefit from the improvement" (Sec. 22547). Article XIII D, Section 4(a) of the California Constitution limits the amount of any assessment to the proportional special benefit conferred on the property. Article XIII D also provides that publicly owned properties must be assessed unless there is clear and convincing evidence that those properties receive no special benefit from the assessment. Exempted from the assessment would be the areas of public streets, public avenues, public lanes, public roads, public drives, public courts, public alleys, public easements and rightsof-ways, public greenbelts and public parkways. The net amount to be assessed may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels. Proposition 218, approved by the voters in November 1996, requires the City to separate general benefit from special benefit, where only special benefit is assessed. Special Benefit The maintenance and servicing of the improvements within the District (which are described in the Description of Services and Improvements Section of this report) are for the benefit of the properties within the District, and as such confer a special and direct benefit to parcels within the District by: improving the livability, appearance, and desirability for properties within the boundaries of the District, and ensuring that improvements do not reach a state of deterioration or disrepair so as to be materially detrimental to properties within the District, and Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 10 Prepared by NBS -Fiscal Year 2010/11 P-354 • providing beautification, shade and overall enhancement to properties within the District. The above mentioned items affect the assessed property in a way that is particular and distinct from their effect on other parcels and that real property in general and the public at large do not share. They contribute to a specific enhancement of the properties within the District. Since these improvements, including the community trails, were installed and are maintained specifically for the properties within the District; only properties within the District receive a special benefit and are assessed for said maintenance. General Benefit In addition to the special benefits received by parcels within the District, there are derivative general benefits that are conferred on parcels outside the boundaries of the District which include: • the control of dust and insect infestations, and • the visual enhancement of the area to persons or vehicles that may travel through the District. However it has been determined that these benefits are derivative and do not provide a direct benefit to parcels outside of the district that are not being assessed. Method of Assessrrrent Spread Each of the parcels within the District is deemed to receive special benefit from the improvements. Each parcel that has a special beneft conferred upon it as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements are identified and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel is determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of the improvements. To assess special benefit appropriately, it is necessary to relate the different type of parcel improvements to each other. The Equivalent Dwelling Unit ("EDU") method of apportionment uses the single family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single family home equals one Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU). Every other land-use is converted to EDUs based on an assessment formula that equates to the property's specific development status, type of development (land-use}, and size of the property, as compared to a single family home. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land-use types, as assigned by County use code, to determine each parcel's EDU assignment. _ Land-Use Equivalent Dwelling Units Property Type (County Use Code) EDU Value Multi tier Single Family Residential 1.00 Dwelling Unit The use of the latest County Assessor's Secured Roll shaft be the basis for the Property Type determination and units/acreage assignments, unless better data is available to the City. In addition, if any parcel within the District is identified by the County Auditor/Controller to be an invalid parcel number for the current fiscal year, the Property Type and EDU assignment shall be based on the correct parcel number andlor new parcel number(s) County use code and subsequent property information. If a single parcel has changed to multiple parcels, the EDU assignment and assessment amount applied to each of the new parcels will be recalculated rather than spread the proportionate share of the original assessment. Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 11 Prepared by NBS -Fiscal Year 2010/11 P-355 The following table summarizes the Fiscal Year 2010/11 maximum allowable assessment rates for the District: Maximum Allowable Property Type (County Assessment Rate Actual Assessment Total Total Use Code) er EDU Rate per EDU Unlts/Acres EDUs Single Family Residential $151.45 $151.45 189.00 169.00 The total amount of maintenance and incidental costs for maintaining the landscaping and community trail improvements is assessed to the individual parcels of real property within the District in proportion to the special benefit received by such parcels of real property. The proposed individual assessments are shown on the assessment roll in this report. Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 12 Prepared by NBS -Fiscal Year 2010111 P-356 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM An Assessment Diagram for the District is shown on the following page. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the County Assessor of the County San Bernardino, at the time this report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Engineer's Report. Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 13 Prepared by NBS -Fiscal Year 2010/11 00 'i Q~ y.+ ._ V a o • c ~ ~ c ..._ i _ _ __ ny ICLay~ v N C _ .l (D ~ N ~ 3 o [0 ~ Q ~~ ^ ny ua~!II!W '. ~ ny ~aaa~ Xe4 .....-... ny ~alsayooa N E ~ ~ ~' ~ C U ~ ~. 1r J ~ ---- -/ o~i of N O ,_.......... ~- ._ . m.._.._.._. i ~ ~nVlse3 in ~ s ~~ v I r _ t ~~ i 7 ~ t~ i ' i ~ _ i~:~ i _. ,, , s ~ ny ~alsayaob i -... `_ ,c ~ ~ r I 1 ~ ~«i" .may +-••-••= • ny anal _ _ y ;.' L .~• ~ ~ ~ o ` ~ ~ m o a ~in ~_ f0 m P-358 ASSESSMENT ROLL Assessment Ro// The assessment roll is a listing of the assessment for Fiscal Year 2010/11 apportioned to each lot or parcel, as shown on the last equalized roll of the Assessor of the County of San Bernardino. The following tables summarize the Fiscal Year 2010/11 maximum and actual assessments for the District: Maximum Allowable Maximum Property Type (County Assessment Rate Total Total Allowable Use Code er EDU UnitslAcres EDUs Assessment Single Family Residential $151.45 189.00 189.00 $28,624.05 Actual Property Type (County Assessment Rate Total Total Actual Use Code er EDU UnitslAcres EDUs Assessment Single Family Residential $151.45 189.00 189.00 $28 X24.05 A copy of the full assessment roll is available for review in the City Clerk's office. Annexations The following annexations are effective for the 2010/11 Fiscal Year: Assessor's Parcel Annexation Total Total Property Type Number Date Pro'ect UnitslAcres EDUs Coun Use Code 0228-011-31, 5/6/2009 DRC2003-0DD48 13.61 0.00 Vacant 0228-011-38 Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 14 Prepared by NBS -Fiscal Year 2010/11 P-359 Revised Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2010/2011 City of Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 10 (Rancho Etiwanda) P-360 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 10 (RANCHO ETIWANDA) 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Phone: 909.477.2740 Fax: 909.477.2741 clrY couNCIL Donald J. Kurth, Mayor L. Dennis Michael, Mayor Pro Tem Rex Gutierrez, Council Member Sam Spagnolo, Council Member Diane Williams, Council Member CITY STAFF John R. Gillison, Assistant City Manager Linda D. Daniels, Deputy City Manager William Wittkopf, Public Works Director Jeff Barnes, Park and Landscape Superintendent Ingrid Y. Bruce, GIS/Special Districts Manager Christopher Bopko, Management Analyst III P-361 TABLE OF CONTENTS ENGINEER'S LETTER 1 INTRODUCTION 3 Reason for Assessment .............................................................................................3 Process for Annual Assessment .................................................................................3 PLAINS AND SPECIFICATIONS 5 Description of the Boundaries of the District ...............................................................5 Description of Improvements and Services ................................................................5 Map of Improvements .................................................................................................6 ESTIMATE OF COSTS ~ District Budget ............................................................................................................7 Definitions cf Budget Items .........................................................................................8 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT 1 ~ General ..................................................................:..................................................10 Special Benefit .........................................................................................................10 General Benefit ........................................................................................................11 Method of Assessment Spread ...............................................................................:11 Maximum and Historical Assessments .....................................................................12 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM ASSESSMENT ROLL 13 14 Assessment Roll .......................................................................................................14 Annexations ..............................................................................................................14 P-362 ENGINEER'S LETTER WHEREAS, on ,the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 (the "1972 Act") adopted its Resolution No. _, a Resolution Initiating Proceedings for the Levy of Annual Assessments for Landscape Maintenance District No. 10 (Rancho Etiwanda) (the "District'); and WHEREAS, the Resolution Initiating Proceedings directed NBS to prepare and file an Engineer's Report for Fiscal Year 2010/11 pursuant to the requirements of the 1972 Act. The Engineer's Report presents the plans and specifications describing the general nature, location and extent of the improvements to be maintained, an estimate of the costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements for the District for the referenced fiscal year, a diagram for the District, showing the area and properties proposed to be assessed, and an assessment of the estimated costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing the improvements, assessing the net amount upon all assessable lots and/or parcels within the District in proportion to the special benefit received; and NOW THEREFORE, the following assessment is proposed to be au±horized in order to pay the estimated costs of maintenance, operation and servicing of the improvements to be paid by the assessable real property within the boundaries of the District in proportion to the special benefit received. The following table summarizes the proposed assessment. SUMMARY OF ASSESSMENT Fiscal Year 2010111 Total Estimated Assessment $462,766.20 Less Anticipated Delinquencies 27 126.20 Total Estimated Revenue $435 640.00 Plus Reserve Fund Contribution 182 460.00 Total Expenditure Budget $618,100.00 Total District EDU Count 751.00 Actual Assessment per EDU $616.20 Maximum Allowable Assessment per EDU $771.79 In making the assessments contained herein pursuant to the 1972 Act: I have identified all parcels which will have a special benefit conferred upon them from the improvements described in the Special Benefit Section of this Engineer's Report (the "Specially Benefited Parcels"). For particulars as to the identification of said parcels, reference is made to the Assessment Diagram, a copy of which is included in this Engineer's Report. 2. I have evaluated the costs and expenses of the improvements upon the Specially Benefited Parcels. In making such evaluation: Landscape Maintenance District No. 10 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2010111 P-363 a. The proportionate special benefit derived by each Specially Benefited Parcel from the improvements was determined in relationship to the entirety of the maintenance costs of the improvements; b. No assessment has been imposed on any Specially Benefited Parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on such parcel from the improvements; and c. Any general benefits from the improvements have been separated from the special benefits and only special benefits have been assessed. I, the undersigned, respectfully submit the enclosed Engineer's Report and, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, the Engineer's Report, Assessments, and the Assessment Diagram herein have been prepared and computed in accordance with the order of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the 1972 Act, Article XIII D of the Constitution of the State of California ("Article XIII D") and the Proposition 218 Omnibus Implementation Act ("Proposition 218"), (the 1972 Act, Article XIII D and Proposition 218 are collectively referred to as the "Assessment Law"). Mark A. Steuer, City Engineer Landscape Maintenance District No. 10 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2010111 P-364 INTRODUCTION Reason for Assessment Approval of the assessment covered by this Engineers Report will generate the revenue necessary to: Provide for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements described in this Engineer's Report. Maintenance may include but is not limited to, all of the following: the repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement, providing for the life, growth, health and beauty of the landscaping, including cultivation, irrigation, trimming, spraying, fertilizing or treating for disease or injury, the removal of trimming, rubbish, debris and other solid waste, the maintenance, repair and replacement as necessary of all irrigation systems and the removal of graffiti from walls immediately adjacent to the cultivated areas. Servicing means the furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operating and servicing of any improvement. Servicing shall also include vehicle, equipment, capital.improvements and administrative costs associated with the annual administration and operation of the District. Process for Annual Assessment The City cannot levy and collect annual assessments within the District without complying with the procedures specified in the 1972 Act. On an annual basis, an Engineers Report must be prepared which contains a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the district. The City Council must also adopt a resolution of intention which: • Declares the intention of the City Council to levy and collect assessments within the assessment district for the fiscal year stated therein. • Generally describes the existing and proposed improvements and any substantial changes proposed to be made in existing improvements. • Refers to the assessment district by its distinctive designation and indicate the general location of the district. • Refers to the report of the engineer, on file with the clerk, for a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the district. • Gives notice of the time and place for public hearing by the City Council on the levy of the proposed assessment. • States whether the assessment is proposed to increase from the previous year. If the assessments are to be levied in the same or lesser amounts than the maximum assessment amount approved, the clerk shall give notice by causing the resolution of intention to be published. Any interested person may, prior to the conclusion of the hearing, file a written protest which shall state all grounds of objection. The protest shall contain a description sufficient to identify the property owned by the property owner filing the protest. During the course or upon conclusion of the public hearing, the City Council may order changes in any of the matters provided in the report, including changes in the improvements, any zones within the assessment district, and the proposed diagram or the proposed assessment. Landscape Maintenance District No. 10 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2010!11 P-365 The City Council, upon conclusion of the public hearing must then adopt a resolution confirming the diagram and assessment, either as originally proposed or as changed by it. The adoption of the resolution shall constitute the levy of an assessment for the fiscal year referred to in the assessment. If the assessment to be levied exceeds the maximum assessment amount previously approved, the City must comply with the procedures specified in Article XIII D and Proposition 218. The voters in the State of California in November 1996 added Article XIII D to the California Constitution imposing, among other requirements, the necessity for the City to conduct an assessment ballot procedure to enable the owners of each property on which assessments are proposed to be enacted or increased, the opportunity to express their support for, or opposition to the proposed assessment or increase in such assessment. The basic steps of the assessment ballot procedure are outlined below. The City must prepare a Notice of Public Hearing ("Notice"), which describes, along with other mandated information, the reason for the proposed assessments, and to provide a date and time of a public hearing to be held on the matter. The City must also prepare an assessment ballot, which clearly gives the property owner the ability to sign and mark their assessment ballot either in favor of, or in opposition to the proposed assessment. The Notice and assessment ballot are mailed to each affected property owner within the assessment district a minimum of 45 days prior to the public hearing date as shown in the Notice. The City may also hold community meetings with the property owners to discuss the issues facing the district and to answer property owner questions directly. After the Notice ar~d assessment ballot are ~ ~ ailed, property owners are given until the close of the public hearing, stated in the Notice, to return their signed and marked assessment ballot. During the public hearing, property owners are given the opportunity to address the City Council and ask questions or voice their concerns. At the public hearing, the returned assessment ballots received prior to the close of the public hearing are tabulated, weighted by the proposed assessment amount on each property and the results are announced by the City Council. Article XIII D provides that if, as a result of the assessment ballot proceeding, a majority protest is found to exist, the City Council shall not have the authority to levy and collect the assessments as proposed. A majority protest exists if the assessments represented by ballots submitted in opposition exceed those submitted in favor of the assessment. All returned ballots are tabulated and weighted according to the financial obligation of each particular parcel. If there is no majority protest as described above, the City Council may approve the proposed assessments. If there is a majority protest, as described above, the City will not levy and collect any assessments. Landscape Maintenance District No. 70 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2010/11 P-366 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS The District provides for the administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing of various improvements located within the public right-of-way and dedicated easements within the boundaries of the District. Description of the Boundaries of fhe District The District is located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California. The boundaries of the District are generally described as that area known as Rancho Etiwanda, which lies north of Highway 210, east of Day Creek Channel, and west of Hanley Avenue. Typically parcels have been annexed to the District as they have developed. Reference is also made to the Assessment Diagram included in this Report. Description of Improvements and Services The improvements are the maintenance and servicing of landscaping sites and appurtenant facilities throughout the District. The various landscaping sites that are maintained consist of parkways, median islands, street trees, paseos and community trails located within street right-of-ways and dedicated public easements which are within the boundaries of the District. The landscaping maintenance includes, but is not limited to, shrubs, turf, tree trimming in irrigated City parkways and paseos, weed and pest control, landscape irrigation systems and testing, trash, debris and graffiti removal, and associated appurtenant facilities. Services include personnel, materials, contracting services, utilities, and all necessary costs associated with the maintenance, replacement and repair required to keep the improvements in a healthy, vigorous and satisfactory condition. In addition, it is the City's intention to continue to use cost effective materials, including the future ability to replace landscaping with drought resistant or low water use plants, in order to lower expenses of the District. The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows: Parks: Day Creek Park. Site # Descriptive Location 10-1 The west side of Day Creek from 790 feet north of Richfield to Wilson. The north side of Wilson from Day Creek to 227 feet west of Day Creek. This site overlaps 10-2. Ground Cover area: 16.941 square feet Hardscape area: 3 589 square feet 10-2 The north and south side of Wilson from 497 feet west of Alvarado to Day Creek with 1 station at top of highest retaining wall on comer of Wilson and Day Creek. This station overlaps site 10-1. The south side of Wilson from Day Creek to Bluegrass. The Wilson median from Day Creek to Bluegrass. Ground Cover area: 47.275 square feet Hardscape area: 6,444 square feet 10-3 The west side of Day Creek from Wilson to 144 feet south of Clydesdale. The Day Creek median from Wilson to Banyan. Ground Cover area: 32,619 square feet Hardscape area: 10,983 square feet Landscape Maintenance Districf Ho. 10 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2010/11 P-367 10-4 The east side of Day Creek from 648 feet south of Keenland to Wilson. Ground Cover area: 15,952 square feet Hardscaoe area: 4,365 square feet 10-5 The west side of Bluegrass from Wilson to 705 feet south of Challendon. Ground Cover area: 26,882 square feet Hardscaoe area: 12,220 square feet 10-6 The south side of Banyan from Rochester to Day Creek. The north side of Banyan from 427 feet west of Rocking Horse to Rocking Horse. The west side of Day Creek from Banyan to Vintage. The Day Creek median from Banyan to Vintage. The north side of Vintage from Day Creek to paseo ending 153 feet west of Sand Hill. Ground Cover area: 44,000 square feet Hardscaoe area: 16,197 square feet 10-7 The north side of Vintage from 180 feet east of Taylor Canyon Place to Day Creek. The east side of Day Creek from Vintage to Banyan. The south side of Banyan from Day Creek to Bluegrass. Ground Cover area: 22,164 square feet Hardscaoe area: 11,724 square feet 10-8 The landscape a-yainst the south side facing wall north of the 210 freeway from the top of the slope on the east side of Day Creek to 300 feet eastward. The Day Creek median from the 210 freeway to Vintage. The east side of Day Creek from Caltrans ROW to Vintage. The south side of Vintage from Day Creek to 180 feet east of Taylor Canyon. Ground Cover area: 16,841 square feet Hardscaoe area: 7,025 square feet 10-9 The north side of Coyote from Brookstone Place to Day Creek. The east side of Day Creek from Coyote to 358 feet north of Coyote. Ground cover area: 8,488 square feet Hardscaoe area: 5,752 square feet 10-10 The north side of Wilson from 395 feet east of Day Creek to Day Creek. The eastside of Day Creek from Wilson to Blackstone. The south side of Blackstone from Day Creek to Stoneview. The north side of Blackstone from Day Creek to 165 feet west of Stoneview. Ground cover area: 26,304 square feet Hardscape area: 19,117 square feet 10-11 The west side of Day Creek from 340 feet north of Banyan to Banyan. The north side of Banyan from Day Creek to Rocking Horse. Ground cover area: 20,378 square feet Hardscape area: 11,212 square feet Ground cover, shrubs and turt areas that make up parkways, median islands and paseos are maintained under contract by a private landscape maintenance company. Parks are maintained by the City's Park Maintenance Crews Map of Improvements The following page shows the map of landscaping improvements, including irrigation sites and community trails, to be maintained using District funds. Landscape Maintenance District No. 70 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2010/11 ,,~~~, Landscape Main Im r R;,,~,,;; ~ tenance District No. ~D Y ~'~~°x-31 ~-` ovement Ma =--~~~~~~ ` ~ ~l _ - ~ - - -- --~ ~ ~-~ -_ = ~ i ~ /~/ ~ 1' !/ ~ ~y~ ~ t~ ~~ t~ '` F ~ ~ .'~ _ t ~ \ y~r,{// T ~ / ~ ' i K~ ~ ~ ! ~~ y~` ,','(~ ! ~ "~RIDGE~57';DR ~ l ,- 10-9 ~ ' ~~,-~~~ ' ~ , . y ; _ ! ; ~~10 124 ~ pl a f ~1 I i ~ \' /,(J,/~~ YJ~ del'-- ` T _ 1 I I! ~_ j.. ~ ~ ~ -! ff ~ ~ l ~ - m -- - >' I ~ i ~ ~ ~ I oa _ 1 ._ Y ~. r . .~L.,;,; ~ o I ~ I ' ~ ~ _ , - , _.. ... _.---..-. _ . ............. ~ I r i h .- ~. ... .. _ _-. ~~~ u Y ~. o ~ I ~~ I ((r^~~ t--! I ,__.._._.~~_ ~f ~ I ~-- _ , ~t z~ ~ i j i i I VISTA VERGE DR ~ ~ . i~ I 1~ ~ ~ ~ Y - I . / f ~, !1f(~.NS CT ~u~( ~ /~'.. ! 1 '' ~ ` ,~ , _,. , , ~(~EE _. _ ,,..jj ~ E ~ ~~ '. 1.,_ `~ .y~~^IT f ( I I __ .~%.. l~.lr Ir~_1 !I }~J 1. ~ I % ~~ 1. . ~~ .._ ~..I r ~. _...7;_T"' ' . 23FiO..ST ~. ~ ~1 __1~-~_.l. ~ _ ~~ l...L. ~r ~ - ~ ~~~, ~ .,j , r . . CleCOkr ,f ~ jj lI ~ ` i ` _, .,L_L ~ i II _ t ~FNRCNrLLOR { r ~~ . J E ` rl . _ . ., ~ I j (T~~ ~ ~ '. ~_E.. ~ ~ DAY ~ + ~- u CREEK ' '` .~ ~ > ~ ~ ~~ u 1 ~,-----. I PARK ' ~ _ ,p (I ( i 1 10~1~1` I ~ ~ -~ , ~ ~ ~' ~ ~ ~ ; .~ KTr}PRVRim CT ~ >x Iiif I !-1 ; 11 I ~ "~UE Srrte>Zeb~ ~r.-' ! , i. ~10 7~~~~aE~a ~ _. ! W.. ` r .ttr. ~ i ~ ~} ~^ ~ ~ l I _ 9' ~. + ~ ' ' ~ ~ ' ~ t . .~ I ,~It~IroEr- - - - _..f I-f- 'l"~ _ x171 ~-_ ~ _ I _- 1 i I T_ ~ .r. i _i.'I _ ~ ~ g iatmk.KVO~Re7 cT t - j' ~ ~ ' I ~ , > ~~~AN oR y r ~''~cr I , ; ,, ° ' ~ ~ ~ i ' oN ~ T -~ I--I ! II f L '~ t-_.~ ~ ~] NicriHORSE O LOCAL RADIO vnth i ~ j RECYCLED WATER LOCAL RADIO ~ ' j r t ! , ` -.I ( '. BIONORNPEAKCT y . ~ ' ~ _-~ --- - , ~ 9 ~ ~ 10~ k' NOT ON CENTRAL r I ~ urve bact r 'z. t ~ ~ ~ I---i '-' I t '-~ ^ WATER METER ONLY F i ' ~ cs - ;' t I! ___ 5 ti - f I~ ~ ~ I I___) i -MAJOR STREET ~- ~ ~ ^~ =CITY PARK SITES -_._ .cr -- - , T ! ~` ~ ~ ~' ~. ~ ~ t '~.•~ i _. .. - _ ' l ii r i ~ ~ E ~ i FREEWAY I _ - MD 10 90UNDARY r -- ~ o(uariv r - ~ - ~.., I~~~ L ~ .~ -~ Cr ~ IONE C~Afi DR ~ ~ ...- . I , - - . •- -• _..~ r --,.- -._ - RODEO DR P-369 ESTIMATE OF COSTS The estimated costs of administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing the improvements as described in the Plans and Specifications are summarized below. Each year, as part of the assessment district levy calculation process, the costs and expenses are reviewed and the annual costs are projected for the following fscal year. District Estimated 2010!11 Budget Personnel Services Regular Salaries $159,070.00 Overtime Salaries 1,050.00 Part-time Salaries 27,590.00 Fringe Benefits 77.790.00 Subtotal Personnel $265,500.00 Operations and Maintenance Operations and Maintenance $26,500.00 Operations and Maintenance/Facilties 4,000.00 Emergency Equipment and Vehicle Rental 1,000.00 Equipment Operations and Maintenance 1,000.00 Contract Services 123,300.00 Contract Services/Facilities 2,000.00 Tree Maintenance 6,860.00 Utilities Water Utilities 72,000.00 Electric Utilities 50,400.00 Assessment Administration 4,130.00 General Overhead 31.410.00 Subtotal Operations and Maintenance $322,600.00 Capital Expenditures Capital Projects $30 000.00 Subtotal Capital Expenditures $30,000.00 Total District Expenditure Budget $616,100.00 Total Estimatod Assessment $462,766.20 Less Anticipated Delinquencies t27 126.201 Total Estimated Revenue $435,640.00 Plus Operating Reserve Fund Contribution 182 460.00 Total Expenditure Budget $618,100.00 Total Estimated Assessment $462,766.20 Total District EDU Count 751.00 Actual Assessment per EDU -Fiscal Year 2010/11 $616.20 Maximum Allowable Assessment er EDU -Fiscal Year 2010/11 $771.79 Landscape Maintenance District No. 10 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 7 Fiscal Year 2010/11 P-370 Each year, prior to the assessments being placed on the tax roll, the City will review the budget and determine the amount needed to maintain the improvements for the upcoming fiscal year. The actual assessment per EDU will be based on the estimated costs of maintenance, available fund balance and maximum allowable assessment with the goal of maintaining the improvements in a satisfactory and healthy condition. The actual assessment amount may be lower than the maximum allowable assessment; however it may not exceed the maximum unless the increase is approved by the property owners in accordance with Proposition 218. It is the intent of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to maintain an Operating Reserve which shall not exceed the estimated costs of maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or when the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The reserve balance information for the District is as follows: Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 3D, 2010 Reserve Fund Balance $1,081,297.80 Operating Reserve Contribution -Fiscal Year 2010/11 (182,460.00) Operalina Reserve Collection -Fiscal Year 2010/11 0.00 Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2011 Reserve Fund Balance $898,837.60 Definitions of Budget Items The following definitions describe the costs and expenses included in the District Budget: Personnel Services Regular Salaries: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all full-time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Part Time Salaries: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all part time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Fringe Benefits: This item includes the benefits available to City employees: health care, vacation, sick time, and retirement fund. Operations and Maintenance Contract Services: This item includes the contract costs of a landscape maintenance company responsible for the ongoing maintenance of the District improvements. Tree Maintenance: This item includes the contract costs attributed to maintaining the street trees and other trees throughout the District. Utilities -Water: This item includes the costs to furnish water for the landscaping within the District. Utilities -Electric: This item includes the costs to furnish electricity required for the operation and maintenance of the sprinklers and irrigation controllers. Assessment Administration: This item includes the cost to all particular departments and staff of the City, and consultants for providing the administration, coordination and management of District services, operations, and incidental expenses related to the District. This item also includes creation of an annual engineer's report, resolutions and placing the assessment amounts onto the County tax roll each year, along with responding to any public inquiries and future Proposition 218 balloting proceedings. Landscape Maintenance District No. 10 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2010/11 P-371 General Overhead: This item includes the costs of all departments and staff of the City for providing the coordination of District services, inspections, annual bid management, responding to public concerns, public education, accounting, auditing and procedural matters associated with the District. This item also includes an allocation for general City staff time for administrative functions and systems that provide for a functional and operational assessment district within the City's administrative structure. Capital Expenditures: Capital Projects: This item includes new improvements to further enhance the level and quality of service provided within the boundaries of the District. This may include new monuments, irrigation systems, and other large improvements. Operating Reserve Collection: Operating Reserve Collection: This item includes the amount to be collected to maintain reserves to enable the City to pay for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or whenever the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The Reserve Fund contribution will continue until such a time the Reserve Fund balance is approximately one half of the annual costs. The fund may be allowed to accumulate in anticipation of any unforeseen expenses not included in the yearly maintenance costs. This may include, but is not limited to, tree replacements, repair of damaged equipment due to vandalism, storms and other similar events. Landscape Maintenance District No. 10 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2010/11 P-372 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT Genera! Pursuant to the 1972 Act and Article XIII D, all parcels that have a special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements and services shall be identified, and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel shall be determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of improvements. The 1972 Act, permits the establishment of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include the operation, maintenance and servicing of landscaping improvements. Section 22573 of the 1972 Act requires that maintenance assessments must be levied according to beneft rather than according to assessed value. This Section states: "The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among a!1 assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by each such !ot or parcel from the improvements." The determination of whether or not a lot or parcel will benefit from the improvements shall be made pursuant to the Improvement Acf of 1911 (Division 7 (commencing with Section 5000) (of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California)." The 1972 Act also permits the designation of zones of benefit within any individual assessment district if "by reasons or variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive different degrees of benefit from the improvement" (Sec. 22547). Article XIII D, Section 4(a) of the California Constitution limits the amount of any assessment to the proportional special benefit conferred on the property. Article XIII D also provides that publicly owned properties must be assessed unless there is clear and convincing evidence that those properties receive no special benefit from the assessment. Exempted from the assessment would be the areas of public streets, public avenues, public lanes, public roads, public drives, public courts, public alleys, public easements and rights-of-ways, public greenbelts and public parkways. The net amount to be assessed may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels. Proposition 218, approved by the voters in November 1996, requires the City to separate general benefit from special benefit, where only special benefit is assessed. Benefit The maintenance and servicing of the improvements within the District (which are described in the Description of Improvements and Services Section of this report) are for the benefit of the properties within the District, and as such confer a special and direct benefit to parcels within the District by: • improving the livability, appearance, and desirability for properties within the boundaries of the District, and • ensuring that improvements do not reach a state of deterioration or disrepair so as to be materially detrimental to properties within the District, and Landscape Maintenance District No. 10 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 10 Fiscal Year 2010/11 P-373 • providing beautification, shade and overall enhancement to properties within the District. The above mentioned items affect the assessed property in a way that is particular and distinct from their effect on other parcels and that real property in general and the public at large do not share. They contribute to a specific enhancement of the properties within the District. Since these improvements, including the community trails, were installed and are maintained specifically for the properties within the Distdct; only properties within the District receive a special benefit and are assessed for said maintenance. General Benefit In addition to the special benefits received by parcels within the District, there are derivative general benefits that are conferred on parcels outside the boundaries of the District which include: • the control of dust and insect intestations, and • the visual enhancement of the area to persons or vehicles that may travel through the District. However it has been determined that these benefits are derivative and do not provide a direct benefit to parcels outside of the district that are not being assessed. Method of Assessment Spread Each of the parcels within the District is deemed to receive special benefit from the improvements. Each parcel that has a special benefit conferred upon it as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements are identified and the proportionate special benefit derived by each ident~ed parcel is determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of the improvements. To assess special benefit appropriately, it is necessary to relate the different type of parcel improvements to each other. The Equivalent Dwelling Unit ("EDU") method of apportionment uses the single family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single family home equals one Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU). Every other land-use is converted to EDUs based on an assessment formula that equates to the property's specific development status, type of development (land-use), and size of the property, as compared to a single family home. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land-use types, as assigned by County use code, to determine each parcel's EDU assignment Land-Use E uivalent Dwellin Units Pro ert T e Coun Use Code EDU Value Multi Ifer Single Family Residential 1.00 Dwelling Unit The use of the latest County Assessor's Secured Roll shall be the basis for the Property Type determination and units/acreage assignments, unless better data is available to the City. In addition, if any parcel within the District is identified by the County AuditorlController to be an invalid parcel number for the current fiscal year, the Property Type and EDU assignment shall be based on the correct parcel number and/or new parcel number(s) County use code and subsequent property information. If a single parcel has changed to multiple parcels, the EDU assignment and assessment amount applied to each of the new parcels will be recalculated rather than spread the proportionate share of the original assessment. Landscape Maintenance District No. 10 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 11 Fiscal Year 2010!11 P-374 The following table summarizes the Fiscal Year 2010/11 maximum allowable assessment rates for the District: Maximum Allowable Property Type Assessment Rate Actual Assessment Total Total (County Use Code) er EDU Rate per EDU Units/Acres EDUs Single Family Residential $771.79 $616.20 751 751 The total amount of maintenance and incidental costs for maintaining the landscaping and community trail improvements is assessed to the individual parcels of real property within the District in proportion to the special benefit received by such parcels of real property. The proposed individual assessments are shown on the assessment roll in this report. Maximum and Historical Assessments The maximum allowable assessment rate per EDU listed above, is the amount ~+~hich was approved in 2001/02, when the District was formed, and subsequent District annexations. Commencing in Fiscal Year 2002/03, the amount of the maximum allowable assessment is proposed to increase each year based upon the Consumer Price Index ("CPI"), All Urban Consumers, for the Los Angeles- Anaheim-San Bernardino Area, as determined by the United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics or its successor. Each year the percentage difference between the CPI for March of each year and the CPI for the previous March shall be computed. The assessment shall be adjusted by an amount not to exceed such percentage for the following fiscal year. Should the Bureau of Labor Statistics revise such index or discontinue preparation of such index, the revised index or a comparable system as approved by the City Council shall be used for determining fluctuations in the cost of living. Historical maximum assessment amounts and actual assessment amounts are shown in the table below: Fiscal Year Maximum Assessment er EDU Actual Assessment er EDU 2001/02 $597. 09 $597. 09 2002/03 613. 69 597. 09 2003/04 637. 75 597. 09 2004/05 648. 93 597. 09 2005!06 6?5. 03 597. 09 2006/07 706. 54 597. 09 2007/08 733. 65 616. 20 2008/09 757. 73 616. 20 2009/10 757. 73 616. 20 2010/11 771. 79 616. 20 Landscape Maintenance District No. 10 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 12 Fiscal Year 2010/11 P-375 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM An Assessment Diagram for the District is shown on the following page. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the County Assessor of the County San Bernardino, at the time this report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Engineer's Report. Landscape Maintenance District No. 10 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 13 Fiscal Year 2010/11 O *~ 'i a 0 ' C ~ ~ ~ i ~ i ' f I i ~ V 1 ~e ~aa C i ~0 e J ,~.. ' i ny ua~! II!W C.-..-..-..-.....-.... ~-...-.... •_- ~ ~' C U1 ~ B G 'in c0 m FBj~ '$ S c ~... . _.. i i ny ~alsayooa ; ..... i. - . _. ny l~ay~ v 0: d C _ J [0 ~ s 3 m g ° ` ~. ¢ / N E o o ~ C U d ~ r~ J ~.r ^b lse3 in ~~ ® "' d 0 N O ny epuenn!;3 i........ ~...... -_.' .~ ~ ~ m c L J rn y N l0 m • •• - - , • ny ano~~ m o: cn = 3 L s o m ° ` o ¢ Ll. ~Ns ¢edp ~~I EIF ny ny ~a;sayooa P-377 ASSESSMENT ROLL Assessment Roll The assessment roll is a listing of the assessment for Fiscal Year 2010!11 apportioned to each lot or parcel, as shown on the last equalized roll of the Assessor of the County of San Bernardino. The following tables summarize the Fiscal Year 2010/11 maximum and actual assessments for the District: Maximum Allowable Maximum Property Type Assessment Rate Total Total Allowable Coun Use Code er EDU UnitslAcres EDUs Assessment Single Family Residential $771.79 751.00 751.00 $579,614.29 Actual Property Type Assessment Rate Total Total Actual Coun Use Code er EDU UnitslAcres EDUs Assessment Single Family Residential $616.20 751.00 751.00 :462,766.20 A copy of the fu!! assessment roll is available for review in the City Clerk's office. Annexations There were no annexations effective for the 2010/11 Fiscal Year. Landscape Maintenance District No. 10 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 14 Fiscal Year 2010111 STAFF REPORT ADI`fINIST&~1TIVE SERVICES DEPARTMENT Date: July 21, 2010 To: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager From: John R. Gillison, Assistant City Manager-- By: Ingrid Bruce, GIS1Special Districts Manager ~ P-378 RANCHO C,UCAMONGA Subject: CONSIDERATION TO APPROVE THE RESOLUTION CONFIRMING THE DIAGRAM AND ASSESSMENT AND ORDERING FOR THE LEVY AND COLLECTION OF THE ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS WITHIN THE PARK AND RECREATION IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. PD-85 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2010/2011. NO INCREASE OF ASSESSMENT RATE IS PROPOSED. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council approve the Resolution confirming the Diagram and Assessment and ordering the levy and collection of assessments within Park and Recreation Improvement District No. PD-85. There is no increase to the current rate in this district proposed for Fiscal Year 2010/2011. The Engineer's Report is on file in the City Clerk's Office. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Each year, per the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972, the City is required to hold a public hearing to receive public comment on the levy and collection of assessments within Park and Recreation Improvement District No. PD-85. This requirement must be accomplished before the City can submit the annual assessments for placement on the County Tax Roll. The following, along with reference to the Engineer's Report for the Districts, identifies proposed Fiscal Year 2010/2011 assessment rates. The Engineer's Report identifies the required budget for the District, including the surplus, if any, remaining in the fund balance. In the past, any available prior year surplus has been used to offset the increasing costs of maintenance for Herftage and Red Hill parks and to enable the City to maintain assessments at the prior year's level. This policy continues for Fiscal Year 2010/2011 and will allow the assessment rates to remain unchanged. Definition Single Family Residential Multi-Family Residential Less than 1.50 acres 1.51 acres to 3.50 acres 3.51 acres to 7.00 acres 7.01 acres to 14.00 acres 14.01 acres to 25.00 acres 25.01 acres and larger Assessment oer Parcel $31.00 $31.00 $15.50 $46.50 $108.50 $217.00 $434.00 $775.00 Attachments Resolution Engineer's Report P-379 RESOLUTION NO. I D -- ~~O A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN THE PARK AND RECREATION IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. PD-85 (HERITAGEAND RED HILL COMMUNITY PARKS) FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 201012011 PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga did on the 16th day of June, 2010, adopt its Resolution of Intention No. 10-096 093 (the "Resolution of Intention") pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, as amended (the "1972 Act"), declaring its intention to levy and collect assessments within the Park and Recreation Improvement District for Fiscal Year 2010/2011 and giving notice of the time and place for a public hearing by the City Council on the levy of the proposed assessments within the Districts; and WHEREAS, the City Council previously received and preliminarily approved a report of the Assessment Engineer (each, an "Annual Engineer's Report" and collectively, the "Annual Engineer's Reports") for each District as required pursuant to Article 4 of Chapter 1 of the 1972 Act, Article XIIID of the Constitution of the State of California ("Article XIIID") and the Proposition 218 Omnibus Implementation Act (Government Code Section 53750 and following) (the "Implementation Act") (the 1972 Act, Article XIIID and the Implementation Act are.referred to collectively as the "Assessment Law"); and WHEREAS, notice of such public hearing was duly and legally published in the time, form and manner as required by the Assessment Law, shown by the affidavit of Publication of said Resolution of Intention on file in the Office of the City Clerk; and, WHEREAS, said City Council having duly received and considered evidence, oral and documentary, concerning the jurisdiction facts in this proceeding and concerning the necessity for the contemplation work and the benefits to be derived there from and said City Council having now acquired jurisdiction to order the proposed work. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, DETERMINED AND ORDERED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, as follows: SECTION 1. This City Council hereby finds and determines that: A. Notice of the public hearing has been given and the proceedings for the consideration of the levy of the annual assessments within the District have been undertaken in accordance with the 1972 Act; and B. The annual assessments for Fiscal Year 2010111 proposed to be levied within the District as set forth in the applicable Annual Engineer's Report do not exceed the annual assessments as previously authorized to be levied within such District and, therefore, the proposed levy of assessments for Fiscal Year 2010/2011 within such District are not deemed to be "increased" over the maximum authorized annual assessments. P-380 SECTION 2. The final assessments and diagram for the proceedings, as contained in the Annual Engineer's Report for the District, is hereby approved and confirmed. The assessments for the District contained in the Annual Engineer's Reports for Fiscal Year 2010/2011 are hereby levied upon the respective lots or parcels in the District in the amounts as set forth in applicable Annual Engineer's Report. SECTION 3. This City Council hereby orders that the work, as set forth and described in the Resolution of Intention, be done and made. SECTION 4. The above-referenced diagram and assessment shall be filed in the Office of the City Clerk. Said diagram and assessment, and the certified copy thereof, shall be open for public inspection. SECTION 5. The City Clerk is hereby ordered and directed to immediately file a certified copy of the diagram and assessment with the County Auditor. Such filing shall be made no later than the 3rd Monday in August 2010. SECTION 6. After the filing of the diagram and assessment, the County Auditor shall enter on the County assessment roll opposfte each lot or parcel of land the amount assessed thereupon, as shown in the assessment. SECTION 7. The assessments shall be collected at the same time and in the same manner as County taxes are collected, and all laws providing for the collection and enforcement of County taxes shall apply to the collection and enforcement of the assessments. SECTION 8. The assessments as above confirmed and levied for these proceedings will provide revenue and relate to the fiscal year commencing July 1, 2010 and ending June 30, 2011. PASSED, APROVED AND ADOPTED this day of , 2010. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: Donald J. Kurth, MD, Mayor ATTEST: Janice Reynolds, City Clerk P-381 I, Janice Reynolds, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a Meeting of said Council on the day of , 2010. Executed this day of , 2010 at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Janice Reynolds, City Clerk P-382 Annual Engineer's Report liiscal Fear 2Q1Q/20II City of Rancho Cucamonga PARKS AND RECREATION IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. PD-85 Approved: Mark Steueq Director Engineering Services/City Engineer P-383 TABLE OF CONTENTS Authority for Report .............................................................................. 3 Fi rz d i ngs .............................................................................. 3 District Analysis .............................................................................. 4 Estimate of Work .............................................................................. 4 Method of Spread .................................................................................... 6 Calendar Year Annexations ........................................................... 8 Boundary Map ..............................................................................9 2 P-384 City of Rancho Cucamonga Annual Report PD-SS Fiscal Year 2010/2011 AUTHORITY FOR REPORT This report for the 2010/2011 fiscal yeaz is prepared pursuant to the order of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972, being Division 15, Section 22500 of the Streets and Highways code. Provisions for this annual assessment are included in Chapter 3 of the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972. The purpose of this report is to set forth findings and the assessment analysis for the annual levy of assessments for the Park and Recreation Improvement District No. PD-SS thereafter referred to as "the District". This District, using direct benefit assessments, was originally created to provide funds to finance the cost of construction, maintenance, operation and. debt payment of Heritage Community Park and Red Hill Community Park in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Subsequently the debt has been repaid with only the ongoing maintenance and operation with periodic capital improvement expenditures of the pazks remaining. FINDINGS Section 22573, Landscape and Lighting Act of ] 972, requires assessments to be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. The section states: "The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements." The means of determining whether or not a parcel will benefit from the improvements is contained in the Improvement Act of 1911 (Division 7, commencing with Section 5000 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California). The 1972 Act also provides for the classification of various areas within an assessment district into benefit areas where, by reason of variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive differing degrees of all territory receiving substantially the same degree of benefit from the improvements and may consist of contiguous or noncontiguous aeeas. As the assessments are levied on the basis of benefit, they aze considered a user's fee, not a tax; and, therefore, are not governed by Article XIIIA. Properties owned by public agencies, such as a city, county, state, or the federal governments is not assessable without the approval ofthe particulaz agency and, normally, are not assessed. Certain other parcels used for railroad mainline right-of-way, public 3 P-385 utility transmission right-of-way, and common azeas are also exempt from assessment. The assessment for mobile home parks will be based upon underlying lot acreage. DISTRICT ANALYSIS A. District Boundary The district includes all of the City of Rancho Cucamonga with the general exception of land east of Deer Creek Channel and the Victoria, Caryn & Terra Vista Planned Communities. All parcels of real property affected aze more particularly described in maps prepazed in accordance with Section 327 of the Revenue and Taxation Code, which aze on file in the office of the San Bernardino County Assessor in the Hall of Records, 172 West Third Street, San Bernazdino, California and which are hereby made a part hereof by reference. B. District Name City of Rancho Cucamonga Pazk and Recreation Improvement District No. PD - 85. C. Facilities The existing works within the District boundary are generally described as follows: 1. The maintenance and operation of Heritage Community Park including, but not limited to, grading, planting, irrigation, onsite roads, sidewalks, parking lots, lighting, restrooms, equestrian facilities, playground equipment, picnic facilities, athletic Facilities, and walking, jogging and equestrian trails and sanitary sewer connections. 2. The maintenance and operation of Red Hill Community Park including, but not limited to, grading, planting, irrigation, onsite roads, sidewalks, parking lots, lighting, waterscape, restrooms, senior citizen facilities, playground equipment, picnic facilities, major lighted athletic facilities, jogging trail, sanitary sewer connections and onsite drainage inlets. D. The assessment rate for the 2010/2011 FY is $31.00. No increase to this assessment rate is proposed. Tt is estimated that this assessment rate will cover the district's maintenance and operation expenses for the 2010/201 I FY. 4 P-386 ESTIMATE OF WORK The Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 pennits carrying forward surpluses or recovering deficits in subsequent fiscal years. Costs for the district will be reviewed annually. Any surplus credited against assessment or any deficits shall be included in the assessment for the following fiscal year. Proposed Maintenance Budget: FY 2010/2011 PROJECTEll REVENUE Personnel Services Regular Salaries Overtime Salazies Part Time Salaries Fringe Benefits Operations & Maintenance Operations & Maintenance Operations & Maintenance -Facilities Vehicle Operations & Maintenance Emergency Equipment & Veh. Rntl Equip Operations &.Maint. Contract Services Contract Services/Facilities Tree Maintenance Telephone Utilities Water Utilities Electric Utilities Assessment Administration Admin./General Overhead Canital Outlay Capital Outlay -Equipment Capital Project Total PD-85 Expenditure Budget Operating Reserve Contribution Projected Revenue Total District Assessment Total District Parcel Count Subtotal Subtotal Subtotal $1,069,680.00 $526,940.00 3,680.00 26,160.00 250,540.00 $807,320.00 $119,750.00 5,000.00 l ,000.00 3,000.00 10,000.00 34,800.00 0.00 18,200.00 6,420.00 190,120.00 114,220.00 152,550.00 85,170.00 $740,230.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 $1,547,550.00 -477,870.00 $1,069,680.00 $1,069,680.00 27,736 P-387 Each year, prior to the assessments being placed on the tax roll, the City will review the budget and determine the amount needed to maintain the improvements for the upcoming fiscal year. The actual assessment will be based on the estimated costs of maintenance, available fund balance and maximum allowable assessment with the goal of maintaining the improvements in a satisfactory and healthy condition. The actual assessment amount may be lower than the maximum allowable assessment; however it may not exceed the maximum unless the increase is approved by the property owners in accordance with Proposition 218. It is the intent of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to maintain an Operating Reserve which shall not exceed the estimated costs of maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December ] 0 of the fiscal year, or when the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The reserve balance information for the District is as follows: Estimated Fiscal Year Ending 3une 30, 2010 Reserve Fund Balance $1,658,532.22 Operating Reserve Contribution -Fiscal Year 2010/ I 1 (447,870) Operating Reserve Collection -Fiscal Yeaz 2010/11 0.00 Estimated Fiscal Year Ending.:une 30, 2011 Reserve Fund Balance $655,832.22 Definitions of Budget Items The following definitions describe the costs and expenses included in the District Budget: Personnel Services Regular Salazies: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all full-time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Overtime Salaries: This item includes costs attributed to work performed by full-time employees over and above their normal scheduled hours. Part Time Salazies: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all part time employees dedicated to maintenance of the parks improvements. Fringe Benefits: This item includes the benefits available to City employees: health caze, vacation, sick time, and retirement fund. Operations and Maintenance Contract Services: This item includes the contract costs of a landscape maintenance company responsible for the ongoing maintenance of the parks improvements. P-388 Tree Maintenance: This item includes the contract costs attributed to maintaining the street trees and other trees throughout the pazks. Utilities -Water: This item includes the costs to furnish water for the landscaping and parks. Utilities -Electric: This item includes the costs to fumish electricity required for the operation and maintenance of the parks lighting, sprinklers and irrigation controllers. Assessment Administration: This item includes the cost to all particulaz departments and staff of the City, and consultants for providing the administration, coordination and management of District services, operations, and incidental expenses related to the District. This item also includes creation of an annual engineer's report, resolutions and placing the assessment amounts onto the County tax roll each year, along with responding to any public inquiries and future Proposition 2I8 balloting proceedings. General Overhead: This item includes the costs of all departments and staff of the City for providing the coordination of District services, inspections, amrual bid management, responding to public concerns, public education, accounting, auditing and procedural matters associated with the District. This item also includes an allocation for general City staff time for administrative functions and systems that provide for a functional and operational assessment district within the City's administrative structure. Capital Expenditures: Capital Proiects: This item includes new improvements to further enhance the level and quality of service provided within the boundaries of the District. This may include new monuments, irrigation systems, and other large improvements. Operating Reserve Collection: Operating Reserve Collection: This item includes the vnount to be collected to maintain reserves to enable the City to pay for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or whenever the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The Reserve Fund contribution will continue until such a time the Reserve Fund balance is approximately one half of the annual costs. The fund maybe allowed to accumulate in anticipation of any unforeseen expenses not included in the yearly maintenance costs. This may include, but is not limited to, tree replacements, repair of damaged equipment due to vandalism, storms and other similaz events. P-389 METHOD OF SPREAD The Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 indicates that assessments may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes costs among all lots or parcels within the District in proportion to the estimated benefit received. A. Definitions The District is divided into three categories for the purpose of determining the assessments as follows: CATEGORY A -includes parcels based on the number of existing residential units within certain ranges of pazcel size. CATEGORY B -includes all pazcels not defined in Category A or Category C. CATEGORY C -includes exempt parcels. Exempt parcels were discovered by searching the County Assessor's computer tapes for those parcels that are listed as exempt by the Assessor or which have an assessed value of less than $500. 1n conducting the search, several parcels were included as exempt that show parcel sizes in excess of 1.5 acres and type codes of, for example, residential or agriculture. These pazcels were added back into the rolls and assessed. B. Formula The assessment formula is based on actual land use information contained in the current San Bernardino Assessor's computer files and Assessor's parcel maps. Category A: All pazcels containing existing residential dwelling units and meeting the following conditions. Parcel Size/Range Less than 1.5 Acres and 1.51 to 35. Acres and 3.51 to 7.0 Acres and 7.01 to 14.0 dwelling units 14.01 to 25.0 Acres and 25.01 acres and larger Dwellint; Units/Parcel 1 or more dwelling units 2 or more dwelling units 4 or more dwelling units 8 or dwelling units I S or more dwelling units 26 or more dwelling units Category A is based on the number of existing residential units. The actual assessment for Bond Debt Service per existing residential dwelling unit may decrease each year as more residential units aze built within the improvement district. Maintenance costs, however, are expected to increase annually and will somewhat offset the anticipated decrease in assessments due to new development. Category B: All parcels not defined in Category A or Category C. Category C: All exempt pazcels as defined below: P-390 1. All. properties currently tax exempt; 2. All public ownership; 3. Railroad mainline rights-of--way 4. Major utility transmission rights-of way; 5. Mineral rights; 6. Parcels so small they currently cannot be built upon; 7. All normally assessable pazcels within an assessed valuation of less than $500 and 1 acres or less; and, C. Summary of Preliminary Assessment Amounts Category A: The preliminary estimated assessment rate, which will be levied during fiscal year 2009/2010, is $31.00 per dwelling unit for those parcels in Category A. Category A parcels containing more than one residential dwelling unit will be assessed for an amount equal to $31.00 times the number of dwelling units. Category B: The assessment, which may be levied for parcels within Category B during fiscal year 2009/2010, shall be according to the following schedule: De£mition Single-Family Residential Multi-Family Residential Less than 1.5 Acres 1.51 Acres to 3.50 Acres 3.51 Acres to 7.0 Acres 7.01 Acres to 14.0 Acres 14.01 Acres to 25.0 Acres 25.01 Acres and larger Category C: Assessment Per Parcel $31.00 $31.00 $15.50 $46.50 $ 108.50 $217.00 $434.00 $775.00 The assessment shall be $0.00 for Category C parcels. 9 P-391 Calendar Year 2009 Annexations Parks and Recreation District - PD-85 PROJECT PM 18797 DRC2004-00816 DRC2005-00703 DRC2003-00048 DRC2007-004SS DRC2008-00587 DRC200S-00327 PM18710 DRC2006-OOS40 UNITS ANNEX. DATE 14.97 AC 1!7/2009 1SFD 3/4/2009 4.S1AC 4/1S/2009 13.61 AC S%6/2009 5 A8AC 6/3/2009 9.21AC 7/1/2009 1.S2AC 8/19/2009 241 MULTI 10/7/2009 225MULTI 10/21 /2009 10 P-392 M Ul ~ ~ N a ~a ~ ~ a J ~ CO -p ~' d y.a Q C U Q o ~ ~ d N p.,.-.- -- ^d wa4~ J y f o y ~ i ,~ _ , .~..~..~..~: ~ pNp Q ` N ~ /-. C ~ .... ..............i. _-' J m w C ~ d = ~ N ~ ~ I ro p o 1 li Q ' ..m..v y ! w • _~.. ~ F ~ ~ ` ' ~ n e uenn! Vl i ny epuenng3l i ~ d P l3 y ,, ~ ,. ~~- ~ ~s ~ ny ia3sayooa 9 :_ ;.. . ___ ny Jalsayooa r ,...~ . i n ua ! ! ~~ ~ ~~!~~ ~ ~.-_ ~_ __., ny ua~!II!W d ~ 11 W ~~ I~ ili n uaneH I n d ny ua eH ny esowlaH (~ ny esowlaH nb' PIe9!yo1V ny PIe9!4o1H ny uewllaH ~ ny uewllaH ~ L L 7 ny p eRau!/~ lS ue!lawe~ k~~~~F[~s~; ! t i a t aj§Fa 6F~~SS~j ~ wv ls~ ~~'~F2 ~ ny an0l~ F e~;~`¢s$g In c - m 2 (n ~~en~yaFd~$F 6~ N O ~ .~[ H9~c .E ~ o ~~ gf~~~ m o Q a ~ ~ m u. ~~~~~~~iFiF;~ a c FS6 °g4$ @{i'61~gF H m d9YE~djy e~i d ~tdc FE8~n2 Fs~ STAFF REPORT ADi~IINISTRATIVE. SERVICES DEPARTMENT Date: July 21, 2010 To: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager From: John R. Gillison, Assistant City Manage By: Ingrid Bruce, GIS/Special Districts Manager Subject: CONSIDERATION TO APPROVE THE RESOLUTION CONFIRMING THE DIAGRAMS AND ASSESSMENTS AND ORDERING THE LEVY AND COLLECTION OF ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS WITHIN STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO'S 1, 2, 3, 4, S, 6, 7 AND 8 FOR FISGAL YEAR 2010/2011. NO INCREASE OF ASSESSMENT RATE IS PROPOSED. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council approve the Resolution confirming the Diagrams and Assessments and ordering the levy and collection of the annual assessments within Street Lighting Maintenance District No's. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8. There is no increase to the current rates in these districts proposed for Fiscal Year 2010/2011. The Engineer's Reports are on file in the City Clerk's Office. BACKGROUN DIANALYSIS: Each year, per the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972, the City is required to hold a public hearing to receive public comment on the levy and collection of assessments within Street Lighting Maintenance District No's 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 (each, a "district" and collectively the Districts). This requirement must be accomplished before the City can submit the annual assessments for placement on the County Tax Roll. The following, along with reference to the Engineer's Reports for the Districts, identifies proposed Fiscal Year 2010/2011 assessment rates. The Engineer's Reports identify the required budget for each of the Districts, including the surplus, if any, remaining in the fund balance for any District. In the past, any available prior year surplus has been used to offset the increasing costs of street light maintenance and to enable the City to maintain assessments at the prior year's level. This policy continues for Fiscal Year 2 01 012 0 1 1 and will allow the assessment rates to remain unchanged. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 assessments pay for energy and maintenance for streetlights on arterial streets. The current assessment rate is $17.77 per single-family residence. The commercial rate is $35.54/acre. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 assessments pay for energy and maintenance for streetlights on residential streets. The curzent assessment rate is $39.97 per single-family residence. The commercial rate is $79.94/acre. P-394 CONSIDERATION TO APPROVE THE RESOLUTION CONFIRMING THE DIAGRAMD AND P:~GL 2 ASSESSMENTS AND ORDERING THE LEVY AND COLLECTION OF ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS WITHIN STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOBS 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 AND 8 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2010/2011 JULY 21,2010 Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3 assessments pay for energy and maintenance for streetlights within the Victoria Planned Community. The current assessment rate is $47.15 per single-family residence. The commercial rate is $94.30/acre. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 4 assessments pay for energy and maintenance for streetlights within the Terra Vista Planned Community. The current assessment rate is $28.96 per single-family residence, and the multi-family rate is $14.48 per dwelling unit. The commercial rate is $57.92/acre. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 5 assessments pay for energy and maintenance for streetiights within the Caryn Planned Community. The current assessment rate is $34.60 per single- family residence. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 8 assessments pay for energy and maintenance for streetlights within the commercial and industrial area of the City. The current assessment rate is $51.40 per acre for commercial property. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 7 assessments pay for energy and maintenance for streetlights within the Etiwanda Highlands Community. The current assessment rate is $33.32 per single-family residence. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 8 assessments pay for energy and maintenance for streetlights in South Etiwanda. The current assessment rate is $61.19 per single-family residence. Attachments Resolutions Engineer's Reports P-395 RESOLUTION NO. ~a'~29 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONFIRMING THE DIAGRAMS AND THE ASSESSMENTS AND ORDERING THE LEVY AND COLLECTION OF THE ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS WITHIN STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS NO'S 1 THROUGH 8, INCLUSIVE, FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2010/2011 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga did on the 16th day of June, 2010, adopt its Resolution of Intention No. 10-099 (the "Resolution of Intention") pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, as amended (the "1972 Act"), declaring its intention to levy and collect assessments within Street Lighting Maintenance Districts No's 1 through 8, inclusive, (each, a "District" and collectively, the "Districts") for Fiscal Year 2010/2011 and giving notice of the time and place for a public hearing by the City Council on the levy of the proposed assessments within the Districts; and WHEREAS, the City Council previously received and preliminarily approved a report of the Assessment Engineer (each, an "Annual Engineer's Report" and collectively, the "Annual Engineer's Reports") for each District as required pursuant to Article 4 of Chapter 1 of the 1972 Act, Article XIIID of the Constitution of the State of California ("Article XIIID") and the Proposition 218 Omnibus Implementation Act (Government Code Section 53750 and following) (the "Implementation Act") (the 1972 Act, Article XIIID and the Implementation Act are referred to collectively as the "Assessment Law"); and WHEREAS, subsequent to the preliminary approval of the Annual Engineer's Reports, the Assessment Engineer revised each of the Annual Engineer's Reports (each, a "Revised Annual Engineer's Report" and collectively, the "Revised Annual Engineer's Reports") to add to such reports information regarding the annexations, if any, to each applicable District during Fiscal Year 2009/2010 and to make certain other insubstantial formatting revisions to the summary of assessments and the District budgets that did not result in an increase of the expenditure budget for the Districts, or any one of them, or the aggregate assessments or any individual assessment proposed to be levied within the Districts, or any one, of them; and WHEREAS, notice of such public hearing was duly and legally published in the time, form and manner as required by the Assessment Law, shown by the affidavit of Publication of said Resolution of Intention on file in the Office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, said City Council having duly received and considered evidence, oral and documentary, concerning the jurisdiction facts in this proceeding and conceming the necessity for the contemplated work and the benefits to be derived there from and said City Council having now acquired jurisdiction to order the proposed work. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, DETERMINED AND ORDERED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, as follows: SECTION 1. This City Council hereby finds and determines that: A. tVotice of the public hearing has been given and the proceedings for the consideration of the levy of the annual assessments within each District have been undertaken in accordance with the 1972 Act; and P-396 B. The annual assessments for Fiscal Year 2010111 proposed to be levied within each District as set forth in the applicable Revised Annual Engineer's Report do not exceed the annual assessments as previously authorized to be levied within such District and, therefore, the proposed levy of assessments for Fiscal Year 2010!2011 within such District are not deemed to be "increased" over the maximum authorized annual assessments. SECTION 2. The Revised Annual Assessment Engineer's Report for each District is hereby approved final assessments and diagrams for the proceedings, as contained in the Revised Annual Engineer's Report for each of the District, is hereby approved and confirmed. The assessments for the Districts contained in the Revised Annual Engineer's Reports for Fiscal Year 2010/2011 are hereby levied upon the respective lots or parcels in the Districts in the amounts as set forth in applicable Revised Annual Engineer's Report. SECTION 3. This City Council hereby orders that the work, as set forth and described in the Resolution of Intention, be done and made. SECTION 4. The above-referenced diagram and assessment shall be filed in the Office of the City Clerk. Said diagram and assessment, and the certified copy thereof, shall be open for public inspection. SECTION 5. The City Clerk is hereby ordered and directed to immediately file a certified copy of the diagram and assessment with the County Auditor. Such filing shall be made no later than the 3rd Monday in August 2010. SECTION 6. After the filing of the diagram and assessment, the County Auditor shall enter on the County assessment roll opposite each lot or parcel of land the amount assessed thereupon, as shown in the assessment. SECTION 7. The assessments shall be collected at the same time and in the same manner as County taxes are collected, and all laws providing for the collection and enforcement of County taxes shall apply to the collection and enforcement of the assessments. SECTION 8. The assessments as above confirmed and levied for these proceedings will provide revenue and relate to the fiscal year commencing July 1, 2010 and ending June 30, 2011. PASSED, APROVED AND ADOPTED this day of , 2010. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: Donald J. Kurth, MD, Mayor ATTEST: Janice Reynolds, City P-397 I, Janice Reynolds, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a Meeting of said Council on the day of , 2010. Executed this day of , 2010 at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Janice Reynolds, City Clerk P-398 Revised Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2010/2011 City of Rancho Cucamonga Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 (Arterial) P-399 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (ATERIAL STREETS) 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Phone: 909.477.2740 Fax: 909.477.2741 CITY COUNCIL Donald J. Kurth, Mayor L. Dennis Michael, Mayor Pro Tem Rex Gutierrez, Council Member Sam Spagnolo, Council Member Diane Williams, Council Member CITY STAFF John R. Gillison, Assistant City Manager Linda D. Daniels, Deputy City Manager William Wittkopf, Public Works Director Jeff Barnes, Park and Landscape Superintendent Ingrid Y. Bruce, GIS/Special Districts Manager Christopher Bopko, Management Analyst III P-400 TABLE OF CONTENTS ENGINEER'S LETTER 1 INTRODUCTION 3 Reason for Assessment .............................................................................................3 Process for Annual Assessment .................................................................................3 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS 5 Description of the Boundaries of the District ...............................................................5 Description of Improvements and Services ................................................................5 Map of Improvements .................................................................................................5 ESTIMATE OF COSTS 6 District Budget ............................................................................................................6 Definitions of Budget Items .........................................................................................7 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT 9 General ....................................................................................................................... 9 Special Benefit ...........................................................................................................9 General Benefit ........................................................................................................10 Method of Assessment Spread ................................................................................10 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM ASSESSMENT ROLL 12 13 Assessment Roll .......................................................................................................13 Annexations ..............................................................................................................14 P-401 ENGINEER'S LETTER WHEREAS, on ,the City Council of the Ciry of Rancho Cucamonga (the "City"), under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 (the "1972 Act") adopted its Resolution No. _, a Resolution Initiating Proceedings for the levy of Annual Assessments for Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (Arterial Streets) (the "District"); and WHEREAS, the Resolution Initiating Proceedings directed NBS to prepare and file an Engineer's Report for Fiscal Year 2010/11 pursuant to the requirements of the 1972 Act. The Engineer's Report presents the plans and specifications describing the general nature, location and extent of the improvements to be maintained, an estimate of the costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements for the District for the referenced fscal year, a diagram for the District, showing the area and properties proposed to be assessed, and an assessment of the estimated costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing the improvements, assessing the net amount upon all assessable lots and/or parcels within the District in proportion to the special benefit received; and NOW THEREFORE, the following assessment is proposed to be authorized in order to pay the estimated costs of maintenance, operation and servicing of the improvements to be paid by the assessable real property.within the boundaries of the District in proportion to the special benefit received. The following table summarizes the proposed assessment. SUMMARY OF ASSESSMENT Fiscal Year 2010111 Total Estimated Assessment $776,119.15 Plus Anticipated Delinquency Penalty 28 269.15 Total Estimated Revenue §747,850.00 Plus Reserve Fund Contribution 253 840.00 Total Expenditure Budget $1,001,690.00 Total District EDU Count 43,675.81 Actual Assessment per EDU $17.77 Maximum Allowable Assessment per EDU $17.77 In making the assessments contained herein pursuant to the 1972 Act: 1 have identified all parcels which will have a special benefit conferred upon them from the improvements described in the Special Benefit Section of this Engineer's Report (the "Specially Benefited Parcels"). For particulars as to the identification of said parcels, reference is made to the Assessment Diagram, a copy of which is included in this Engineer's Report. 2. I have evaluated the costs and expenses of the improvements upon the Specially Benefited Parcels. In making such evaluation: Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1-City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2010/11 P-402 a. The proportionate special benefit derived by each Specially Benefited Parcel from the improvements was determined in relationship to the entirety of the maintenance costs of the improvements; b. No assessment has been imposed on any Specially Benefited Parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on such parcel from the improvements; and c. Any general benefits from the improvements have been separated from the special benefits and only special benefits have been assessed. I, the undersigned, respectfully submit the enclosed Engineer's Report and, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, the Engineer's Report, Assessments, and the Assessment Diagram herein have been prepared and computed in accordance with the order of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Assessment Law. Mark A. Stever, City Engineer Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1-City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2010/11 P-403 INTRODUCTION Reason for Assessment Approval of the assessment covered by this Engineer s Report will generate the revenue necessary to: Provide for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements described in this Engineer's Report. Maintenance may include but is not limited to, all of the following: the repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement. Servicing means the furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operating and servicing of any improvement. Servicing shall also include vehicle, equipment, capital improvements and administrative costs associated with the annual administration and operation of the District. Process for Annual Assessment The City cannot levy and collect annual assessments within the District without complying with the procedures specified in the 1972 Act. On an annua! basis, an Engineer's Report must be prepared which contains a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the district. The City Council must also adopt a resolution of intention which: • Declares the intention of the City Council to levy and collect assessments within the assessment district for the fiscal year stated therein. • Generally describes the existing and proposed improvements and any substantial changes proposed to be made in existing improvements. • Refers to the assessment district by its distinctive designation and indicate the general location of the district. Refers to the report of the engineer, on file with the clerk, for a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the district. • Gives notice of the time and place for public hearing by the City Council on the levy of the proposed assessment. • States whether the assessment is proposed to increase from the previous year. If the assessments are to be levied in the same or lesser amounts than the maximum assessment amount approved, the clerk shall give notice by causing the resolution of intention to be published. Any interested person may, prior to the conclusion of the public hearing, file a written protest which shall state all grounds of objection. The protest shall contain a description sufficient to identify the property awned by the property owner filing the protest. During the course or upon conclusion of the hearing, the City Council may order changes in any of the matters provided in the report, including changes in the improvements, any zones within the assessment district, and the proposed diagram or the proposed assessment. The City Council, upon conclusion of the public hearing must then adopt a resolution confirming the diagram and assessment, either as originally proposed or as changed by it. The adoption of the resolution shall constitute the levy of an assessment for the fiscal year referred to in the assessment. If the assessment to be levied exceeds the maximum assessment amount previously approved, the City must comply with the procedures specified in Article XIII D and Proposition 218. The voters in the State of California in November 1996 added Article XIII D to the California Constitution imposing, Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 3 Fiscal Year 2010/11 P-404 among other requirements, the necessity for the City to conduct an assessment ballot procedure to enable the owners of each property on which assessments are proposed to be enacted or increased, the opportunity to express their support for, or opposition to the proposed assessment or increase in such assessment. The basic steps of the assessment ballot procedure are outlined below. The City must prepare a Notice of Public Hearing ("Notice"), which describes, along with other mandated information, the reason for the proposed assessments, and to provide a date and time of a public hearing to be held on the matter. The City must also prepare an assessment ballot, which clearly gives the property owner the ability to sign and mark their assessment ballot either in favor of, or in opposition to the proposed assessment. The Notice and assessment ballot are mailed to each affected property owner within the District a minimum of 45 days prior to the public hearing date as shown in the Notice. The City may also hold community meetings with the property owners to discuss the issues facing the District and to answer property owner questions directly. After the Notice and assessment ballot are mailed, property owners are given until the close of the public hearing, stated in the Notice, to return their signed and marked assessment ballot. During the public hearing, property owners are given the opportunity to address the City Council and ask questions or voice their concerns. At the public hearing, the returned assessment ballots received prior to the close of the public hearing are tabulated, weighted by the proposed assessment amount on each property and the results are announced by the City Council. Article XIII D provides that if, as a result of the assessment ballot proceeding, a majority protest is found to exist, the City Council shall not have the authority to levy and collect the assessments as proposed. A majority protest exists if the assessments represented by ballots submitted in opposition exceed those submitted in favor of the assessment. All returned ballots are tabulated and weighted according to the financial obligation of each particular parcel. If there is no majority protest as described above, the City Council may approve the proposed assessments. If there is a majority protest, as described above, the City will not levy and collect any assessments. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1-City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2010111 P-405 PLANS AND SPEClF1CATIONS The District provides for the administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing of various improvements located within the public right-of-way and dedicated easements within the boundaries of the District. Description of the Boundaries of the District The District is located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California. The boundaries of the District are generally described as the entire City of Rancho Cucamonga. Reference is also made to the Assessment Diagram included in this Report. Description of Improvements and Services The improvements are the maintenance and servicing of street lights, traffic signals and appurtenant facilities throughout the District. The maintenance and servicing includes, but is not limited to, furnishing electric current for public lighting facilities including street lights and traffic signals, and associated appurtenant facilities. Services include personnel, materials, contracting services, utilities, and all necessary costs associated with the maintenance, replacement and repair required to keep the improvements in operational and satisfactory condition. In addition, it is the City's intention to continue to use cost effective materials, in order to lower expenses of the District. Map of Improvements The following page shows the map of street light and traffic signal improvements to be maintained using District funds. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1-City of Rancho Cucamonga 5 Fiscal Year 2010/11 ® L ' tq m t J c6 a ~ c6 D 7 r ~ g - C C S ~ rn O Cn m ~ U_ r- f ~ V ~ ~ ~ J d z~~; = ~ e ~~~ & r j' t ~ ~ ~ 8 ~~ ..,.m o ~~ ~ _ t/J .vmv...na ''rmwaa ~ • ~ r wi~~w }} ` i~=~-..- :fix:,. Q .r m.w. ~ ~ s~7 V ~ i.~.w+on .~. V = 1ti, •vnmiw F ~ hFR' O ~ Il: , v ! ..ex ~ ~ I~{~ U ~ •r..oW~.x N1 av...w,ox ~ ~E VI OYmPN J ~' iF ~+ ~ ~ ~ ..~~ ` .>,.w..x ` m N d .rY..Y„ ~~ ~: ~.~.Ww r §~~~t~e~B•~~~t~ g Eg ~ E y ~ ~ ga~.•EEgg F$~Ss~~~ ! ~ €~~~~x P-407 ESTIMATE OF COSTS The estimated costs of administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing the improvements as described in the Plans and Specifications are summarized below. Each year, as part of the assessment district levy calculation process, the costs and expenses are reviewed and the annual costs are projected for the following fiscal year. District Estimated 2010111 Bud et Personnel Services Regular Payroll $21,660.00 Part-time Salaries 0.00 Fringe Benefits 10.180.00 Subtotal Personnel ~ $31,840.00 Opeations and Maintenance Training $180.00 Membership Dues 4,030.00 Operations and Maintenance 4,940.00 Equipment Operations and Maintenance 500.00 Contract Services 14,670.00 Utilities Telephone Utilities ~ 1,180.00 Electric Utilities 718,680.00 Assessment Administration 156,290.00 General Overhead 53,090.00 Interfund Allocation 16.290.00 Subtotal Operations and Maintenance $969,850.00 Capital Expenditures Capital Projects $0.00 Subtotal Capital Expenditures $0.00 Total Expenditure Budget $1,001,690.00 Total Estimated Assessment $776,119.15 Less Anticipated Delinquencies 128.269.151 Total Estimated Revenue $747,850.00 Plus Operating Reserve Fund Contribution 253.840.00 Total Expenditure Budget $1,001,690.00 Total Estimated Assessment $776,119.15 Total District EDU Count 43,675.81 Actuat Assessment per EDU -Fiscal Year 2010/11 $17.77 Maximum Allowable Assessment er EDU -Fiscal Year 2010!11 $17.77 'Includes rounding as each parcel's annual assessment must be rounded down to the nearest even cent for County tax roll purposes. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2010111 P-408 The maximum allowable assessment per EDU listed in the District budget above, is the amount which was approved in 1996/97 and subsequent District annexations. Each year, prior to the assessments being placed on the tax roll, the City will review the budget and determine the amount needed to maintain the improvements for the upcoming fiscal year. The actual assessment per EDU will be based on the total amount of funds needed to maintain the improvements in a satisfactory and healthy condition. The actual assessment amount may be lower than the maximum allowable assessment; however it may not exceed the maximum unless the increase is approved by the property owners in accordance with Proposition 218. It is the intent of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to maintain an Operating Reserve which shall not exceed the estimated costs of maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December t 0 of the fiscal year, or when the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The reserve balance information for the District is as follows: Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2010 Reserve Fund Balance $1,174,418.16 Operating Reserve Contribution - Fisal Year 2010/11 (253,840.00) Operatinc Reserve Collection -Fiscal Year 2010/11 0.00 Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2011 Reserve Fund Balance $920,578.16 Definitions of Budget Items The following definitions describe the costs and expenses included in the District Budget: Personnel Services Regular Salaries: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all full-time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Part Time Salaries: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all part time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Fringe Benefits: This item includes the benefits available to City employees: health care, vacation, sick time, and retirement fund. Operations and Maintenance Contract Services: GIS services for maintaining the street lights and traffic signals database. This is a combination of field and office work and is split evenly between all of the City's Street Light Maintenance Districts. Membership Dues: ISMA Certification. The cost is split evenly between all of the City's Street Light and Maintenance Districts. Utilities -Electric: This item includes the casts to furnish electricity required for the operation and maintenance of the street lights and traffic signals. Assessment Administration: This item includes the cost to all particular departments and staff of the City, and consultants for providing the administration, coordination and management of District services, operations, and incidental expenses related to the District. This item also includes creation of an annual engineer's report, resolutions and placing the assessment amounts onto the County tax roll each year, along with responding to any public inquiries and future Proposition 218 balloting proceedings. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1-City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2010/11 P-409 General Overhead: This item includes the costs of all departments and staff of the City for providing the coordination of District services, inspections, annual bid management, responding to public concerns, public education, accounting, auditing and procedural matters associated with the District. This item also includes an allocation for general City staff time for administrative functions and systems that provide for a functional and operational assessment district within the City's administrative structure. Interfund Allocation: This item is for night time field verifcation of street lights working and daytime matching of pole numbers against invoices received to ensure accurate billing. The budget is divided evenly between all of the City's Street Light Maintenance Districts. Capital Expenditures: Capital Projects: This item includes new improvements to further enhance the level and quality of service provided within the boundaries of the District. This may include new or replacement street lights or traffic signals and appurtenant facilities. Operating Reserve Collection: Operating Reserve Collection: This item includes the amount to be collected to maintain reserves to enable the City to pay forthe maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or whenever the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The Reserve Fund contribution will continue until such a time the Reserve Fund balance is approximately one half of the annual costs. The fund may be allowed to accumulate in anticipation of any unforeseen expenses not included in the yearly maintenance costs. This may include, but is not limited to, street light or traffic signal replacements, repair of damaged improvements due to vandalism, storms and other similar events. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2010/11 P-410 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT General Pursuant to the 1972 Act and Article XIII D, all parcels that have a special benefit conferzed upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements and services shall be identified, and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel shall be determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of improvements. The 1972 Act, permits the establishment of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include the public lighting facilities, including traffic signals.. Section 22573 of the 1972 Act requires that maintenance assessments must be levied according to beneft rather than according to assessed value. This Section states: "The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district maybe apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements. The determination of whether or rot a lot or parcel will benefrt from the improvements shall be made pursuant to the Improvement Act of 1911 (Division 7 (commencing with Section 5000) Hof the Streets and Highways Code, State of Calffomia]. ° The 1972 Act also permits the designation of zones of benefit within any individual assessment district if "by reasons or variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive different degrees of benefit from the improvement" (Sec. 22574). Article XIII D, Section 4(a) of the California Constitution limits the amount of any assessment to the proportional special benefit conferred on the property. Article XIII D also provides that publicly owned properties must be assessed unless there is clear and convincing evidence that those properties receive no special benefit from the assessment. Exempted from the assessment would be the areas of public streets, public avenues, public lanes, public roads, public drives, public courts, public alleys, public easements and rights-of-ways, public greenbelts and public parkways. The net amount to be assessed may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels. Proposition 218, approved by the voters in November 1996, requires the City to separate general benefit from special benefit, where only special benefit is assessed. Special Benefit The maintenance and servicing of the improvements within the District (which are described in the Description of Improvements and Services Section of this report) are for the benefit of the properties within the District, and as such confer a special and direct benefit to parcels within the District by: improving the livability, safety, appearance, and desirability for'properties within the boundaries of the District, and ensuring that improvements do not reach a state of deterioration or disrepair so as to be materially detrimental to properties within the District, and Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 7 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2010/11 P-411 • providing for safe vehicular and pedestrian access for properties within the District, and • providing beautification, shade and overall enhancement to properties within the District. The above mentioned items affect the assessed property in a way that is particular and distinct from their effect on other parcels and that real property in general and the public at large do not share. They contribute to a specific enhancement of the properties within the District. Since these improvements were installed and are maintained specifically for the properties within the District; only properties within the District receive a special benefit and are assessed for said maintenance. General Benefit In addition to the special benefits received by parcels within the District, there are derivative general benefits that are conferred on parcels outside the boundaries of the District which include: • the safety and visual enhancement of the area to persons or vehicles that may travel through the District. However it has been determined that these benefits are derivative and do not provide a direct benefit to parcels outside of the district that are not being assessed. Method of Assessment Spread Each of the parcels within the District is deemed to receive special benefit from the improvements. Each parcel that has a special benefit conferred upon it as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements are identified and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel is determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of the improvements. When the District was formed in 1984, Article XIII D and Proposition 218 had not yet been passed. Upon the passage of Article XIII D and the subsequent passage of the Proposition Omnibus Implementation Act, new rules were put into place. Due to the changes in legal requirements, as property annexed to the District after the passage of the Assessment Law, the description of the method of assessment became more refined, however, the assessment per parcel has remained the same since the 1996!97 Fiscal Year. Further, no parcel included in the District formation or annexations prior to when the language was refined, are now being levied differently than they were at the time the District was formed or the parcels were annexed. To assess special benefit appropriately, it is necessary to relate the different type of parcel improvements to each other. The Equivalent Dwelling Unit ("EDU°) method of apportionment uses the single family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single family home equals one Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU). Every other land-use is converted to EDUs based on an assessment formula that equates to the property's specifc development status, type of development (land-use), and size of the property, as compared to a single family home. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land-use types, as assigned by County use code, to determine each parcel's EDU assignment. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 10 Fiscal Year 2010/11 P-412 Land-Use Equivalent Dwellino Units Pro e T e Coun Use Code EDU Value Multi tier Single Family Residential 1.00 Parcel Multi-family Residential 1.00 Unit Non Residential 2.00 Acre The use of the latest County Assessor's Secured Roll shall be the basis for the Property Type determination and units/acreage assignments, unless better data is available to the City. In addition, if any parcel within the District is identified by the County Auditor/Controller to be an invalid parcel number for the current fiscal year, the Property Type and EDU assignment shall be based on the correct parcel number and/or new parcel number(s) County use code and subsequent property information. If a single parcel has changed to multiple parcels, the EDU assignment and assessment amount applied to each of the new parcels will be recalculated rather than spread the proportionate share of the original assessment. The following table summarizes ~~e Fiscal Year 2010!11 maximum allowable assessment rates for the District: Maximum Property Type Allowable Actual (County Use Code) Assessment Rate Assessment Rate Total Total er EDU er EDU UnitslAcres EDUs Single Family Residential 517.77 $17.77 27,040.00 27,D40.00 Mufti-family Residential 17.77 17.77 10,543.00 10,543.00 Non Residential 17.77 17.77 3,046.41 6,092.81 The total amount of maintenance and incidental costs for maintaining the street lights and traffic signals is assessed to the individual parcels of real property within the District in proportion to the special benefit received by such parcels of real property. The proposed individual assessments are shown on the assessment roll in this report. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1-City of Rancho Cucamonga 11 Fiscal Year 2010/11 P-473 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM An Assessment Diagram for the District is shown on the following page. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the County Assessor of the County San Bernardino, at the time this report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Engineer's Report. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1-City of Rancho Cucamonga 12 Fiscal Year 2010111 P-414 N ~r ~ N V w E J Q Q '~ ~` ~ U rn N c C L• ti.. J ~ ~ N NN C C J m ~ o N O ~ C m m t ~ 3 o '~ ~i Q ny ise3 in L ~ ~ ,C ny epuenn!;3 .~ J w ny Ja;sayoo~{ ny Ja;sayooa ny ua~!!I!W nV ua~l!II!W ny uaneH ny uaneH ny esowJaH (~ ny esowJaH nH Pleq!yoJb' nV Pleq!4oJH ny uewllaH ~ ny uewllaH ~ L L ~ ny p e~aul/~ ;g ue!lawe~ FF ~fiEt Fp~+-@@€~€EE~ ~ 6~~yp~Fy35E~5 !n ~ c J 0] = ~ ~ nd anOJ~ L ~%~~~§~€afiF i~t~~~~855 S L rn o o E•~s' i ~ ~= ~ .0 _ UJ m l0 ~ p ~ c ~ 5 3 ~,3 ~£'s YES ~taaa5Y p$[€; ~ ~ ~ C CO I.L p ~FLC 5ss ~~$g l~5 e-` yiP. 'O Vl c l6 m L'y ~~s~ ;5p~~[E'ypE¢~ a E ~~s ': = ~ ~ 4€~ E~x tis`~; Y~nee s~i Y °Edb ~b=£oQ ~E ' ~ x~ - ~a s:i%~;~' ~ ExdeaBE~tiE€e U P-475 ASSESSMENT ROLL Assessment Roll The assessment roll is a listing of the assessment for Fiscal Year 2010/11 apportioned to each lot or parcel, as shown on the last equalized roll of the Assessor of the County of San Bernardino. The following tables summarize the Fiscal Year 2010/11 maximum and actual assessments for the District: Property Type Count Use Code Maximum Allowable Assessment Rate er EDU Total UnitslAcres Total EDUs Maximum Allowable Assessment Single Family Residential $17.77 27,040.00 27,040.00 $480,500.80 Multi-family Residential 17.77 10,543.00 10,543.00 187,349.11 Non Residential 17.77 3,046.41 6,092.81 108,26924 TOTALS 40,629.41 43,675.81 $776,119.15 Property Type Coun Use Code Actual Assessment Rate. er EDU Total Units/Acres Total EDUs Actual Assessment Single Family Residential $17.77 27,040.00 27,040.00 $480,500.80 Multi-family Residential 17.77 10,543.00 10,543.00 187,349.11 Non Residential 17.77 3,046.41 6,092.81 108,269.24 TOTALS 40,629.41 43,675.81 $776,119.15 A copy of the full assessment roll is available for review in the City Clerk's office. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1-City of Rancho Cucamonga 13 Fiscal Year 2010/11 P-476 Annexations The following annexations are effective for the 2010/11 Fiscal Year: Assessor's Parcel Annexation Total Total Property Type Number Date Pro'ect Units/Acres EDUs Coun Use Code 1077-422-01, 1077-422'46' 1!7/2009 PM18797 14.97 29.94 Non Residential 1077-422-95, 1077-422-96 1062-641.57 3/4/2009 DRC2004-00816 1.00 1.00 Single Family Residential 0229-141-14 4/15/2009 DRC2005-00703 4.81 9.62 Non Residential 0228-011-31. 5/6/2009 DRC2003-00048 0.00 0.00 Vacant 0228-011-38 1089-011-06 6/3/2009 DRC'L007-00455 5.08 10.16 Non Residential 0208-101-22, 0208-101-23, 7/1/2009 DRC2008-00587 9.21 18.42 Non Residential 0208-101-24, 0208-101-25 0207-132-53 8!19/2009 DRC2005-00327 1.52 3.04 Non Residential 0227-532-16 10/7/2009 PM18710 241.00 241.00 Multi-family Residential 0229-041-10 10/21!2009 DRC2006-00540 225.00 225.00 Multi-family Residential Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 14 Fiscal Year 2010/11 P-477 Revised Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2010/2011 City of Rancho Cucamonga Street Lighting ~Viaintenance ®istrict IVo. 2 (Local Streets) P-418 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 (LOCAL STREETS) 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Phone: 909.477.2740 Fax: 909.477.2741 CITY COUNCIL Donald J. Kurth, Mayor L. Dennis Michael, Mayor Pro Tem Rex Gutierrez, Council Member Sam Spagnolo, Council Member Diane Williams, Council Member CITY STAFF John R. Gillison, Assistant City Manager Linda D. Daniels, Deputy City Manager William Wittkopf, Public Works Director Jeff Bames, Park and Landscape Superintendent Ingrid Y. Bruce, GIS/Special Districts Manager Christopher Bopko, Management Analyst III P-419 TABLE OF CONTENTS ENGINEER'S LETTER 1 INTRODUCTION 3 Reason for Assessment .............................................................................................3 Process for Annual Assessment .................................................................................3 PLANS AND SPECIF/CAT/ONS 5 Description of the Boundaries of the District ...............................................................5 Description of improvements and Services ................................................................5 Map of Improvements .................................................................................................5 ESTIMATE OF COSTS ii District Budget ............................................................................................................6 Definitions of Budget Items .........................................................................................7 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT 9 General ............................................................................. .......................................... 9 Special Benefit ................................................................. ..........................................9 General Benefit ................................................................ ........................................10 Method of Assessment Spread ........................................ ........................................10 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM ASSESSMENT ROLL 12 13 Assessment Roll .......................................................................................................13 Annexations ..............................................................................................................13 P-420 ENGINEER'S LETTER WHEREAS, on ,the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga (the "City"), under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 (the "1972 Act") adopted its Resolution No. _, a Resolution Initiating Proceedings for the Levy of Annual Assessments for Street Light Maintenance District No. 2 (Local Streets) (the "District"); and WHEREAS, the Resolution Initiating Proceedings directed NBS to prepare and file an Engineer's Report for Fiscal Year 2010/11 pursuant to the requirements of the 1972 Act. The Engineer's Report presents the plans and specifications describing the general nature, location and extent of the improvements to be maintained, an estimate of the costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements for the District for the referenced fiscal year, a diagram for the District, showing the area and properties proposed to be assessed, and an assessment of the estimated costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing the improvements, assessing the net amount upon all assessable lots and/or parcels within the District in proportion to the special benefit received; and NOW THEREFORE, the following assessment is proposed to be authorized in order to pay the estimated costs of maintenance, operation and servicing of the improvements to be paid by the assessable real properly within the boundaries of the District in proportion to the special benefit received. The following table summarizes the proposed assessment. SUMMARY OF ASSESSMENT Fiscal Year 2010/71 Total Estimated Assessment $364,341.34 Plus Antiapated Delinquency Penalty 25 Ot 1.34 Total Estimated Revenue $339,330.00 Plus Reserve Fund Contribution 0.00 Total Expenditure Budget $339,330.00 Total District EDU Count 9,115.37 Actual Assessment per EDU $39.97 Maximum Allowable Assessment per EDU $39.97 In making the assessments contained herein pursuant to the 1972 Act: I have identified all parcels which will have a special benefit conferred upon them from the improvements described in the Special Benefit Section of this Engineer's Report (the "Specially Benefited Parcels"). For particulars as to the identification of said parcels, reference is made to the Assessment Diagram, a copy of which is included in this Engineer's Report. 2. I have evaluated the costs and expenses of the improvements upon the Specially Benefited Parcels. In making such evaluation: Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2010111 P-421 a. The proportionate special benefit derived by each Specially Benefited Parcel from the improvements was determined in relationship to the entirety of the maintenance costs of the improvements; b. No assessment has been imposed on any Specially Benefited Parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on such parcel from the improvements; and c. Any general benefits from the improvements have been separated from the special benefits and only special benefits have been assessed. I, the undersigned, respectfully submit the enclosed Engineer's Report and, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, the Engineer's Report, Assessments, and the Assessment Diagram herein have been prepared and computed in accordance with the order of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Assessment Law. Mark A. Steuer, City Engineer Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2010/11 P-422 INTRODUCTION Reason for Assessment Approval of the assessment covered by this Engineers Report will generate the revenue necessary to: Provide for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements described in this Engineer's Report. Maintenance may include but is not limited to, all of the following: the repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement. Servicing means the furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operating and servicing of any improvement. Servicing shall also include vehicle, equipment, capital improvements and administrative costs associated with the annual administration and operation of the District. Process for Annual Assessment The City cannot levy and collect annual assessments within the District without complying with the procedures specified in the 1972 Act. On an annual basis, an Engineer's Report must be prepared which contains a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the district. The City Council must also adopt a resolution of intention which: • Declares the intention of the City Council to levy and collect assessments within the assessment district for the fiscal year stated therein. • Generally describes the existing and proposed improvements and any substantial changes proposed to be made in existing improvements. • Refers to the assessment district by its distinctive designation and indicate the general location of the district. • Refers to the report of the engineer, on file with the clerk, for a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the district. • Gives notice of the time and place for public hearing by the City Council on the levy of the proposed assessment. • States whether the assessment is proposed to increase from the previous year. If the assessments are to be levied in the same or lesser amounts than the maximum assessment amount approved, the clerk shall give notice by causing the resolution of intention to be published. Any interested person may, prior to the conclusion of the public hearing, file a written protest which shall state all grounds of objection. The protest shall contain a description sufficient to identify the property owned by the property owner filing the protest. During the course or upon conclusion of the hearing, the City Council may order changes in any of the matters provided in the report, including changes in the improvements, any zones within the assessment district, and the proposed diagram or the proposed assessment. The City Council, upon conclusion of the public hearing must then adopt a resolution confirming the diagram and assessment, either as originally proposed or as changed by it. The adoption of the resolution shall constitute the levy of an assessment for the fiscal year refereed to in the assessment. If the assessment to be levied exceeds the maximum assessment amount previously approved, the City must comply with the procedures specified in Article XIII D and Proposition 218. The voters in the State of California in November 1996 added Article XIII D to the Califomia Constitution imposing, Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2010/t 1 P-423 among other requirements, the necessity for the City to conduct an assessment ballot procedure to enable the owners of each property on which assessments are proposed to be enacted or increased, the opportunity to express their support for, or opposition to the proposed assessment or increase in such assessment. The basic steps of the assessment ballot procedure are outlined below. The City must prepare a Notice of Public Hearing ("Notice"), which describes, along with other mandated information, the reason for the proposed assessments, and to provide a date and time of a public hearing to be held on the matter. The City must also prepare an assessment ballot, which clearly gives the property owner the ability to sign and mark their assessment ballot either in favor of, or in opposition to the proposed assessment. The Notice and assessment ballot are mailed to each affected property owner within the District a minimum of 45 days prior to the public hearing date as shown in the Notice. The City may also hold community meetings with the property owners to discuss the issues facing the District and to answer property owner questions directly. After the Notice and assessment ballot are mailed, property owners are given until the close of the public hearing, stated in the Notice, to return their signed and marked assessment ballot. During the public hearing, property owners are given the opportunity to address the City Council and ask questions or voice their concerns. At the public hearing, the returned assessment ballots received prior to the close of the public hearing are tabulated, weighted by the proposed assessment amount on each property and the results are announced by the City Council. Article XIII D provides that if, as a result of the assessment ballot proceeding, a majority protest is found to exist, the City Council shall not have the authority to levy and collect the assessments as proposed. A majority protest exists if the assessments represented by ballots submitted in opposition exceed those submitted in favor of the assessment. All returned ballots are tabulated and weighted according to the financial obligation of each particular parcel. If there is no majority protest as described above, the City Council may approve the proposed assessments. If there is a majority protest, as described above, the City will not levy and collect any assessments. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2010/11 P-424 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS The District provides for the administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing of various improvements located within the public right-of-way and dedicated easements within the boundaries of the District. Description of the Boundaries of the District The District is located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California. The boundaries of the District are generally described as the residential areas of the City west of Haven Avenue. Reference is also made to the Assessment Diagram included in this Report. Description of Improvements and Services The improvements are the maintenance and servicing of street lights, traffic signals and appurtenant facilities throughout the District. The maintenance and servicing includes, but is not limited to, furnishing electric current for public lighting facilities including street lights and traffic signals, and associated appurtenant facilities. Services include personnel, materials, contracting services, utilities, and all necessary costs associated with the maintenance, replacement and repair required to keep the improvements in operational and satisfactory condition. In addition, it is the City's intention to continue to use cost effective materials, in order to lower expenses of the District. Map of Improvements The following page shows the map of street light and traffic signal improvements to be maintained using District funds. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2010111 P-425 N w ~~ V v~ J N Q B ~ U ~ 'n c o ~ ~ u ....... _ ... _____.._._.__. ny ways ~ :-.Y 4 C i_.._.._.._.._ v J 5.. o ~ ~ , ~ r a~ N G ~.. ~ C 41 _ = ~ o W w C ~ m t 3 i _j '' . __. _ I ~.._. I ^d;se '~"'' I ®~ ~ w ~ .L _ .. i ny epueNU;3r .. ~ ........ __ ny epuenn!13 i 1 _ i +'i ~8 ~aa~~ Xea ~ ~ ~ ~. .. ._..~._.._.._.._.._..~ I , i y., ny ~a;sayooy s i . ........_, ny ~a;sayooa ~i _ ~ ' i ny ua~!il!W Y._.._.._......... ................ . ___...,, ..................1. _,.....,_. ny ua~!II!W ny uaneH i ~ ~ l ny uaneH ny esow~aH ny esow~aH ny Pleq!4a~'d ny pleq!yay ny uewpaH ~ ny uewllaH V) L ~ R ny p eF(au~ ;g ue!lawe~ g~e~~~g~e{~~ Q_' 1 A` anoJ F'y F~~p 5t F fi E~~$'s fs b d ~ g [ . E fi ii °• ~ ~ N m O LL Q t$f (ni~4 g {~ yy53 E pg~~F;~a;3~~ ~ C` { °~fii'~s8~~€i~ m ~~tF~~I €`~fi ! ~E~.~9 ~g 4 j4,.Y~~ ¢ °i3 t-§$~ ¢~ ~a~g°g=§s~~¢ F~.~sy,~i~e U FaFY€?€~Y3~i P-426 ESTIMATE OF COSTS The estimated costs of administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing the improvements as described in the Plans and Specifications are summarized below. Each year, as part of the assessment district levy calculation process, the costs and expenses are reviewed and the annual costs are projected for the following fiscal year. District Budget Estimated 2010/11 Bud et Personnel Services Regular Payroll $0.00 Part-time Salaries 0.00 Fringe Benefits 0.00 Subtotal Personnel $0.00 Operations and Maintenance Training $0.00 Membership Dues 0.00 Operations and Maintenance 0.00 Equipment Operations and Maintenance 0.00 Contract Services 0.00 Utilities Telephone Utilities 0.00 Electric Utilities 276,010.00 Assessment Administration 38,430.00 General Overhead 24,690.00 Interfund Allocation 0.00 Subtotal Operations and Maintenance $339,330.00 Capital Expenditures Capital Projects $0.00 Subtotal Capital Expenditures $0.00 Total District Expenditure Budget $339,330.00 Total Estimated Assessment $364,341.34 Less Anticipated Delinquencies 125.011.34) Total Estimated Revenue $339,330.00 Plus Operating Reserve Fund ConVibution 0.00 Total Expenditure Budget $339,330.00 Total Estimated Assessment $364,341.34 Total District EDU Count 9,115.37 Actual Assessment per EDU -Fiscal Year 2010111 $39.97 Maximum Allowable Assessment er EDU -Fiscal Year 2010/11 $39.97 The maximum allowable assessment per EDU listed in the District budget above, is the amount which was approved in 1996/97 and subsequent District annexations. Each year, prior to the assessments being placed on [he tax roll, the City will review the budget and determine the amount needed to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2-City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2010/11 P-427 maintain the improvements for the upcoming fiscal year. The actual assessment per EDU will be based on the total amount of funds needed to maintain the improvements in a satisfactory and healthy condition. The actual assessment amount may be lower than the maximum allowable assessment; however it may not exceed the maximum unless the increase is approved by the property owners in accordance with Proposition 218. It is the intent of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to maintain an Operating Reserve which shall not exceed the estimated costs of maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or when the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The reserve balance information for the District is as follows: Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2010 Reserve Fund Balance $0.00 Operating Reserve Contribution -Fiscal Year 2010/11 0.00 Ooerating Reserve Collection -Fiscal Year 2010/11 0.00 Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2011 Reserve Fund Balance 0.00 Definitions of Budget /terns The following definitions describe the costs and expenses inciuded in the District Budget Personnel Services Regular Salaries: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all full-time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Part Time Salaries: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all part time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Fringe Benefits: This item includes the benefits available to City employees: health care, vacation, sick time, and retirement fund. Operations and Maintenance Contract Services: GIS services for maintaining the street lights and traffic signals database. This is a combination of field and office work and is split evenly between afl of the City's Street light Maintenance Districts. Membershio Dues: ISMA Certification. The cost is split evenly between all of the City's Street Light and Maintenance Districts. Utilities -Electric: This item includes the costs to furnish electricity required for the operation and maintenance of the street lights and traffic signals. Assessment Administration: This item includes the cost to all particular departments and staff of the City, and consultants for providing the administration, coordination and management of District services, operations, and incidental expenses related to the District. This item also includes creation of an annual engineer's report, resolutions and placing the assessment amounts onto the County tax roll each year, along with responding to any public inquiries and future Proposition 218 balloting proceedings. General Overhead: This item includes the costs of all departments and staff of the City for providing the coordination of District services, inspections, annual bid management, responding to public concerns, public education, accounting, auditing and procedural matters associated with the District. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2010/11 P-428 This item also includes an allocation for general City staff time for administrative functions and systems that provide for a functional and operational assessment district within the City's administrative structure. Interfund Allocation: This item is for night time field verbcation of street lights working and daytime matching of pole numbers against invoices received to ensure accurate billing. The budget is divided evenly between all of the City's Street Light Maintenance Districts. Capital Expenditures: Capital Projects: This item includes new improvements to further enhance the level and quality of service provided within the boundaries of the District. This may include new or replacement street lights or traffic signals and appurtenant facilities. Operating Reserve Collection: Ooeratino Reserve Collection: This item includes the amount to be collected to maintain reserves to enable the City to pay for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or whenever the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The Reserve Fund contribution will continue until such a time the Reserve Fund balance is approximately one half of the annual vests. The fund may be allowed to accumulate in anticipation of any unforeseen expenses not included ir. the yearly maintenance costs. This may include, but is not limited to, street light or traffic signal replacements, repair of damaged improvements due to vandalism, storms and other similar events. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2010!11 P-429 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT General Pursuant to the 1972 Act and Article XIII D, all parcels that have a special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements and services shall be identified, and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel shall be determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of improvements. The 1972 Act, permits the establishment of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include the public lighting facilities, including traffic signals.. Section 22573 of the 1972 Act requires that maintenance assessments must be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. This Section states: "The net amount fo be assessed upon lands within an assessment distnct maybe apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by each such lot or paroel from the improvements. The deter, rination of whether or not a lot or pamel will benefit from the improvements shall be made pursuant to the Improvement Act of 1911 (Division 7 (commencing with Section 5000) (of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California]." The 1972 Act also permits the designation of zones of benefit within any individual assessment district if "by reasons or variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive different degrees of benefit from the improvement" (Sec. 22574). Article XIII D, Section 4(a) of the California Constitution limits the amount of any assessment to the proportional special benefit conferred on the property. Article XIII D also provides that publicly owned properties must be assessed unless there is clear and convincing evidence that those properties receive no special benefit from the assessment. 6cempted from the assessment would be the areas of public streets, public avenues, public lanes, public roads, public drives, public courts, public alleys, public easements and rightsof-ways, public greenbelts and public parkways. The net amount to be assessed may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels. Proposition 21 S, approved by the voters in November 1996, requires the City to separate general benefit from special benefit, where only special benefit is assessed. Benefit The maintenance and servicing of the improvements within the District (which are described in the Description of Improvements and Services Section of this report) are for the benefit of the properties within the District, and as such confer a special and direct benefit to parcels within the District by: • improving the livability, safety, appearance, and desirability for properties within the boundaries of the District, and • ensuring that improvements do not reach a state of deterioration or disrepair so as to be materially detrimental to properties within the District, and Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2010/11 P-430 • providing for safe vehicular and pedestrian access for properties within the District, and • providing beautification, shade and overall enhancement to properties within the District. The above mentioned items affect the assessed property in a way that is particular and distinct from their effect on other parcels and that real property in general and the public at large do not share. They contribute to a specific enhancement of the properties within the District. Since these improvements were installed and are maintained specifically for the properties within the District; only properties within the District receive a special benefit and are assessed for said maintenance. General Benefit In addition to the special benefits received by parcels within the District, there are derivative genera! benefits that are conferred on parcels outside the boundaries of the District which include: • the safety and visual enhancement of the area to persons or vehicles that may travel through the District. However it has been determined that these benefits are derivative and do not provide a direct benefit to parcels outside of the district that are not being assessed. Method of Assessment Spread Each of the parcels within the District is deemed to receive special benefit from the improvements. Each parcel that has a special benefit conferred upon it as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements are identified and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel is determined in relationship to the entire casts of the maintenance and operation of the improvements. When the District was formed in 1983; Article Xill D and Proposition 218 had not yet been passed. Upon the passage of Article XIII D and the subsequent passage of the Proposition Omnibus Implementation Act, new rules were put into place. Due to the changes in legal requirements, as property annexed to the District after the passage of the Assessment Law, the description of the method of assessment became more refined, however, the assessment per parcel has remained the same since the 1996!97 Fiscal Year. Further, no parcel included in the District formation or annexations prior to when the language was refined, are now being levied differently than they were at the time the District was formed or the parcels were annexed. To assess special benefit appropriately, it is necessary to relate the different type of parcel improvements to each other. The Equivalent Dwelling Unit ("EDU") method of apportionment uses the single family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single family home equals one Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU). Every other land-use is converted to EDUs based on an assessment formula that equates to the property's specifc development status, type of development (land-use), and size of the property, as compared to a single family home. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land-use types, as assigned by County use code, to determine each parcel's EDU assignment. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 10 Fiscal Year 2010!11 P-431 Land-Use Equivalent Dwelling Units Pro ert T e Coun Use Code EDU Value Multi tier Single Family.Residential 1.00 Parcel Multi-family Residential 1.00 Unit Non Residential 2.D0 Acre Vacant 2.00 Acre The use of the latest County Assessor s Secured Roll shall be the basis for the Property Type determination and units/acreage assignments, unless better data is available to the City. In addition, if any parcel within the District is identified by the County Auditor/Controller to be an invalid parcel number for the current fiscal year, the Property Type and EDU assignment shall be based on the correct parcel number andlor new parcel number(s) County use code and subsequent property information. If a single parcel has changed to multiple parcels, the EDU assignment and assessment amount applied to each of the new parcels will be recalculated rather than spread the proportionate share of the original assessment. The following table summarizes the Fiscal Year 2010/11 maximum allowable assessment rates for the District: Property Type (County Use Coded Maximum Allowable Assessment Rate er EDU Actual Assessment Rate er EDU Total Units/Acres Total EDUs Single Family Residential $39.97 $39.97 6,167.00 6,167.00 Multi-family Residential 39.97 39.97 2,868.00 2,868.00 Non Residential 39.97 39.97 40.18 80.37 Vacant 39.97 39.97 0.00 0.00 The total amount of maintenance and incidental costs for maintaining the streetlights and traffic signals is assessed to the individual parcels of real property within the District in proportion to the special benefit received by such parcels of real property. The proposed individual assessments are shown on the assessment roll in this report. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 11 Fiscal Year 2010/11 P-432 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM An Assessment Diagram for the District is shown on the following page. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the County Assessor of the County San Bernardino, at the time this report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made part, of this Engineer's Report. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 12 Fiscal Year 2010/11 ® N m ~ ~ = f6 C ' ~ '6 7 n - O C O g ~ ~ m ~ m N ~ ~ w o C cn U cn d ~ ,~ ~ . 1 d ~._ _.._ . J I .~ 1 2 t{ 2 s E C N ~ i ~ Z `~ nveWw_e3' tlR~°•we3 ~~ ~ ~ f e V O` i _ ~~ . •` Q ryi. r ~ _ ~ ~,,a y/ ! 4_ N d ~ .tl.,..r" ,~, ~~. ~ ~ " I4YWCtl C I4 C (~ ~ ; +~..~ee~1{1fWWYV _ +v wilnlw xd .S~ ~ ~ .. L H x TT 3 ^V/ ~ ~ _ L C w ~ + ._ +r wavy N W J ~ +v v.aw~ax .W,m d J ~ ~~/~ ~ +ar ~ rewvnw+v v! ~ ~ .a wanleu w ~.wtlwN ~ ~ § .r owe.rx d ~t E( ~ ~ ^p~ ~ ~ fF tf a o p E a ggF :f a ~9~'yebYF~°€~~°s~i pFiv € .F~ e ~a~~~. P-434 ASSESSMENT ROLL Assessment Roll The assessment roll is a listing of the assessment for Fiscal Year 201 D/11 apportioned to each lot or parcel, as shown on the fast equalized roll of the Assessor of the County of San Bernardino. The following tables summarize the Fiscal Year 2010/11 maximum and actual assessments for the District: Property Type Coun Use Code Maximum Allowable Assessment Rate er EDU Total Units/Acres Total EDUs Maximum Allowable Assessment Single Family Residential $39.97 6,167.00 6,167.00 $246,494.99 Multi-family Residential 39.97 2,868.00 2,868.00 114,633.96 Non Residential 39.97 40.18 80.37 3,212.39 Vacant 39.97 0.00 0.00 0.00 TOTALS 9,075.18 9,115.37 $364,341.34 Property Type Coun Use Code Actual Assessment Rate er EDU Total UnitslAcres Total EDUs Actual Assessment Single Family Residential $39.97 6,167.00 6,167.00 $246,494.99 Multi-family Residential 39.97 2,868.00 2,868.00 114,633.96 Non Residential 39.97 40.18 80.37 3.212.39 Vacant 39.97 0.00 0.00 0.00 TOTALS 9,075.18 9,115.37 $364,341.34 A copy of the full assessment roll is available for review in the City Clerk's office. Annexations The following annexations are effective for the 2010111 Fiscal Year: Assessor's Parcel Annexation Total Total Property Type Number Date Pro'ect UnitslAcres EDUs Coun Use Code 1062-641-57 3/4/2009 DRC200400816 1.00 1.00 Single Family Residential 0229-041-10 10/21/2009 DRC2006-00540 225.00 225.00 Multi-family Residential Street Lighling Maintenance District No. 2 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 13 Fiscal Year 2010/11 P-435 Revised Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2010!2011 City of Rancho Cucamonga Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3 (Victoria Planned Community) P-436 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. (VICTORIA PLANNED COMMUNITY) 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Phone: 909.477.2740 Fax: 909.477.2741 CITY COUNCIL Donald J. Kurth, Mayor L. Dennis Michael, Mayor Pro Tem Rex Gutierrez, Council Member Sam Spagnolo, Council Member Diane Williams, Council Member CITY STAFF John R. Gillison, Assistant City Manager Linda D. Daniels, Deputy City Manager William Wittkopf, Public Works Director Jeff Barnes, Park and Landscape Superintendent Ingrid Y. Bruce, GIS/Special Districts Manager Christopher Bopko, Management Analyst III P-437 TABLE OF CONTENTS ENGINEER'S LETTER INTRODUCTION 1 3 Reason for Assessment .............................................................................................3 Process for Annual Assessment .................................................................................3 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS 5 Description of the Boundaries of the District ...............................................................5 Description of Improvements and Services ................................................................5 Map of Improvements .................................................................................................5 ESTIMATE OF COSTS 6 District Budget ............................................................................................................6 Definitions of Budget Items .........................................................................................7 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT 9 General ............................................................................. .......................................... 9 Special Benefit ................................................................. ..........................................9 General Benefit ................................................................ ........................................10 Method of Assessment Spread ........................................ ........................................10 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM ASSESSMENT ROLL 12 13 Assessment Roll .......................................................................................................13 Annexations ..............................................................................................................13 P-438 ENGINEER'S LETTER WHEREAS, on ,the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga (the "City"), under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 (the "1972 Act") adopted its Resolution No. _, a Resolution Initiating Proceedings for the Levy of Annual Assessments for Street Light Maintenance District No. 3 (Victoria Planned Community) (the "DistricC); and WHEREAS, the Resolution Initiating Proceedings directed NBS to prepare and file an Engineer's Report for Fiscal Year 2010/11 pursuant to the requirements of the 1972 Act. The Engineer's Report presents the plans and specifications describing the general nature, location and extent of the improvements to be maintained, an estimate of the costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements for the District for the referenced fiscal year, a diagram for the District, showing the area and properties proposed to be assessed, and an assessment of the estimated costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing the improvements, assessing the net amount upon all assessable lots and/or parcels within the District in proportion to the special benefit received; and NOW THEREFORE, the following assessment is proposed to be authorized in order to pay the estimated costs of maintenance, operation and servicing of the improvements to be paid by the assessable real property within the boundaries of the District in proportion to the special benefit received. The following table summarizes the proposed assessment. SUMMARY OF ASSESSMENT Fiscal Year 2010111 Total Estimated Assessment $347,352.16 Plus Anticipated Delinquency Penalty 14 202.16 Total Estimated Revenue $333,150.00 Plus Reserve Fund Contribution 51 410.00 Total Expenditure Budget $384,560.00 Total District EDU Count 7,366.96 Actual Assessment per EDU $47.15 Maximum Allowable Assessment per EDU $47.15 In making the assessments contained herein pursuant to the 1972 Act: I have identified all parcels which will have a special benefit conferred upon them from the improvements described in the Special Benefit Section of this Engineers Report (the "Specially Benefited Parcels"). For particulars as to the identification of said parcels, reference is made to the Assessment Diagram, a copy of which is included in this Engineer's Report. I have evaluated the costs and expenses of the improvements upon the Specially Benefited Parcels. In making such evaluation: Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 1 Fiscal Year 2010/11 P-439 a. The proportionate special benefit derived by each Specially Benefited Parcel from the improvements was determined in relationship to the entirety of the maintenance costs of the improvements; b. No assessment has been imposed on any Specially Benefited Parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on such parcel from the improvements; and c. Any general benefits from the improvements have been separated from the special benefits and only special benefits have been assessed. I, the undersigned, respectfully submit the enclosed Engineer's Report and, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, the Engineer's Report, Assessments, and the Assessment Diagram herein have been prepared and computed in accordance with the order of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Assessment Law. Mark A. Steuer, City Engineer Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 2 Fiscal Year 2010111 P-440 INTRODUCTION Reason for Assessment Approval of the assessment covered by this Engineer's Report will generate the revenue necessary to: Provide for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements described in this Engineer's Report. Maintenance may include but is not limited to, all of the following: the repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement. Servicing means the furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operating and servicing of any improvement. Servicing shall also include vehicle, equipment, capital improvements and administrative costs associated with the annual administration and operation of the District. Process for Annual Assessment The City cannot levy and collect annual assessments within the District without complying with the procedures specified in the 1972 Act. On an annual basis, an Engineers P.eport must be prepared which contains a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the district. The City Council must also adopt a resolution of intention which: • Declares the intention of the City Council to levy and collect assessments within the assessment district for the fiscal year stated therein. Generally describes the existing and proposed improvements and any substantial changes proposed to be made in existing improvements. • Refers to the assessment district by its distinctive designation and indicate the general location of the district. Refers to the report of the engineer, on file with the clerk, for a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the district. • Gives notice of the time and place for public hearing by the City Council on the levy of the proposed assessment. • States whether the assessment is proposed to increase from the previous year. If the assessments are to be levied in the same or lesser amounts than the maximum assessment amount approved, the clerk shall give notice by causing the resolution of intention to be published. Any interested person may, prior to the conclusion of the public hearing, file a written protest which shall state all grounds of objection. The protest shall contain a description sufficient to identify the property owned by the property owner filing the protest. During the course or upon conclusion of the hearing, the City Council may order changes in any of the matters provided in the report, including changes in the improvements, any zones within the assessment district, and the proposed diagram or the proposed assessment. The City Council, upon conclusion of the public hearing must then adopt a resolution confirming the diagram and assessment, either as originally proposed or as changed by it. The adoption of the resolution shall constitute the levy of an assessment for the fiscal year referred to in the assessment. If the assessment to be levied exceeds the maximum assessment amount previously approved, the Citv must comply with the procedures specified in Article XIII D and Proposition 218. The voters in Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 3 Fiscal Year 2010/11 P-441 the State of Califomia in November 1996 added Article XIII D to the California Constitution imposing, among other requirements, the necessity for the City to conduct an assessment ballot procedure to enable the owners of each property on which assessments are proposed to be enacted or increased, the opportunity to express their support for, or opposition to the proposed assessment or increase in such assessment. The basic steps of the assessment ballot procedure are outlined below. The City must prepare a Notice of Public Hearing ("Notice"), which describes, along with other mandated information, the reason for the proposed assessments, and to provide a date and time of a public hearing to be held on the matter. The City must also prepare an assessment ballot, which clearly gives the property owner the ability to sign and mark their assessment ballot either in favor of, or in opposition to the proposed assessment. The Notice and assessment ballot are mailed to each affected property owner within the District a minimum of 45 days prior to the public hearing date as shown in the Notice. The City may also hold community meetings with the property owners to discuss the issues facing the District and to answer property owner questions directly. After the Notice and assessment ballot are mailed, property owners are given until the close of the public hearing, stated in the Notice, to return their signed and marked assessment ballot. During the public hearing, property owners are given the opportunity to address the City Council and ask questions or voice their concerns. At the public hearing, the returned assessment ballots received prior to the close of the public hearing are tabulated, weighted by the proposed assessment amount on each property and the results are announced by the City Council. Article XIII D provides that if, as a result of the assessment ballot proceeding, a majority protest is found to exist, the City Council shall not have the authority to levy and collect the assessments as proposed. A majority protest exists if the assessments represented by ballots submitted in opposition exceed those submitted in favor of the assessment. All retumed ballots are tabulated and weighted according to the financial obligation of each particular parcel. If there is no majority protest as described above, the City Council may approve the proposed assessments. If there is a majority protest, as described above, the City will not levy and collect any assessments. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 4 Fiscal Year 2010/11 P-442 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS The District provides for the administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing of various improvements located within the public right-of-way and dedicated easements within the boundaries of the District. Description of the Boundaries of fhe District The District is located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California. The boundaries of the District are generally described as that area of the City known as the Victoria Planned Community, which is generally bounded by the 210 Freeway on the north, Etiwanda Avenue on the east, the 15 Freeway on the south east. The western portion of the District is bounded by Base Line Road on the South, while the eastern portion of the District is bounded by the i 5 Freeway on the South. The western portion of the District is bounded by Hermosa Avenue on the west and the eastern portion of the District is bounded by Rochester Avenue on the west. Reference is also made to the Assessment Diagram included in this Report. Descripfion of Improvements and Services The improvements are the maintenance and servicing of street lights, traffic signals and appurtenant facilities throughout the District. The maintenance and servicing includes, but is not limited to, furnishing electric current for public lighting facilities including street lights and traffic signals, and associated appurtenant facilities. Services include personnel, materials, contracting services, utilities, and all necessary casts associated with the maintenance, replacement and repair required to keep the improvements in operational and satisfactory condition. In addition, it is the City's intention to continue to use cost effective materials, in order to lower expenses of the District. Map of Improvements The following page shows the map of street light and traffic signal improvements to be maintained using District funds. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2010/11 ® P-443 ~~ & ~ ~ m Uw a 9 N U 1- N C ~ u 1 U U • • _ ,; : • ~ ~ • - ~ 1 _srwTOUNn PL . . • . - w ld '~ VRIP' a .ORE ¢ 202 _ rcl K ~ ~ U O v ¢ 3 `~ U ' ~ d+ •• ~ 1•••f EDEN A~ _ O, i•~rj w VN303 F, O) ~• ~ v w H _ I • ¢ of ItlM e P N ~ J r \_ 10 1 atl N $ ~ ~ w y pk _ ~ s \~ ) U V O J ~ ~ L ~~ °~ z tl13 OW ~edbry09 ~`~~` 6~ ~ r ~ non uNw • ~ • 1 b .. ~ ° • • • ._ 1 3 a 0 • ~ ~ N • • l8 =133110 AV ,~.., N al • i la •. "- • • ~~ w ° ld3 NB ~ ld O I 3NId m ~ „~ -='ar^~=.sue-T:"l~r'-'~° .~..~s.:-:-.i-3sc __--=~=°'==~'S.cs.... ~ 0 EN ` ~ ~ T {3 y I~ x 4~ O C B LAN P~ id M C a31s3uooa ¢ ~ 0 ~ p O ~ ~' Z ®y S O d tllNtll O ¢ p 7 0 _ ~ 3 V 0 'a •~ a { L Q '1i • o ¢ ~ d) J ••~ p y • ~ ~y • T RNI •• ~ ~' s t ~d d i ~ p~~ )d ~_„L ~ ~ V_/ ) ~ I, ~ '^ P 1 v, E 1 O ~J V r aro r =_ ~' ~ N •~ ax _ o 1} ~ L ~ 1} ~"' a ~"a ~"*: ~ ~ ~ ~.~ N ~~1 ~~ f VI ~gi ~s4"F y~~~`j.a A, ~ I~~~k tttt'~1~'FII%n~~€B E.P $ d C c F{ .TS ~ nz `s V/ ~i ~~1 ~4~~p3 ~~~1~ P-444 ESTIMATE OF COSTS The estimated costs of administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing the improvements as described in the Plans and Specifications are summarized below. Each year, as part of the assessment district levy calculation process, the costs and expenses are reviewed and the annual costs are projected for the following fiscal year. DlStrlCt Estimated 2010/11 Bud et Personnel Services Regular Payroll $21,660.00 Part-time Salaries 0.00 Fringe Benefits 10.180.00 Subtotal Personnel $31,840.00 Operations and Maintenance Training $180.00 Membership Dues 30.00 Operations and Maintenance 9,940.00 Equipment Operations and Maintenance 0.00 Contract Services 14,670.00 Utilities Telephone Utilities 0.00 Electric Utilities 254,400.00 Assessment Administration 35,290.00 General Overhead 21,920.00 Interfund Allocation 16 290.00 Subtotal Operations and Maintenance 5352,720.00 Capital Expenditures Capital Projects $0.00 Subtotal Capital Expenditures $0.00 Total District Expenditure Budget 8364,560.00 Total Estimated Assessment $347,352.16 Less Anticipated Delinquencies (14.202.161 Total Estimated Revenue 5333,150.00 Plus Operating Reserve Fund Contribution 51.410.00 Total Expenditure Budget 5384,560.00 Total Estimated Assessment 5347,352.16 Total District EDU Count 7.366.96 Actual Assessment per EDU -Fiscal Year 2010!11 $47.15 Maximum Allowable Assessment er EDU -Fiscal Year 2010/11 $47.15 The maximum allowable assessment per EDU listed in the District budget above, is the amount which was approved in 1996/97 and subsequent District annexations. Each year, prior to the assessments being placed on the tax roll, the City will review the budget and determine the amount needed to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2010/11 P-445 maintain the improvements for the upcoming fiscal year. The actual assessment per EDU will be based on the total amount of funds needed to maintain the improvements in a satisfactory and healthy condition. The actual assessment amount may be lower than the maximum allowable assessment; however it may not exceed the maximum unless the increase is approved by the property owners in accordance with Proposition 218. It is the intent of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to maintain an Operating Reserve which shall not exceed the estimated costs of maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or when the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The reserve balance information for the District is as follows: Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2010 Reserve Fund Balance $983.222.33 Operating Reserve Contdbution -Fiscal Year 2010/11 (51,410.00) Operating Reserve Collection -Fiscal Year 2010/11 0.00 Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2011 Reserve Fund Balance $931,812.33 Definitions of Budget Items The following definitions describe the costs and expenses included in the District Budget Personnel Services Regular Salaries: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all full-time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Part Time Salaries: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all part time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Fringe Benefits: This item includes the benefits available to City employees: health care, vacation, sick time, and retirement fund. Operations and Maintenance Contract Services: GIS services for maintaining the street lights and traffic signals database. This is a combination of field and office work and is split evenly between all of the City's Street Light Maintenance Districts. Membership Dues: ISMA Certification. The cost is split evenly between all of the City's Street Light and Maintenance Districts. Utilities -Electric: This item includes the costs to furnish electricity required for the operation and maintenance of the street lights and traffic signals. Assessment Administration: This item includes the cost to all particular departments and staff of the City, and consultants for providing the administration, coordination and management of District services, operations, and incidental expenses related to the District. This item also includes creation of an annual engineer's report, resolutions and placing the assessment amounts onto the County tax roll each year, along with responding to any public inquiries and future Proposition 218 balloting proceedings. General Overhead: This item includes the costs of all departments and staff of the City for providing the coordination of District services, inspections, annual bid management, responding to public concerns, public education, accounting, auditing and procedural matters associated with the District. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2010/11 P-446 This item also includes an allocation for general City staff time for administrative functions and systems that provide for a functional and operational assessment district wthin the City's administrative structure. Interfund Allocation: This item is for night time field verification of street lights working and daytime matching of pole numbers against invoices received to ensure accurate billing. The budget is divided evenly between all of the City's Street Light Maintenance Districts. Capital Expenditures: Capital Projects: This item includes new improvements to further enhance the level and quality of service provided within the boundaries of the District. This may include new or replacement street lights or traffic signals and appurtenant facilities. Operating Reserve Collection: Operating Reserve Collection: This item includes the amount to be collected to maintain reserves to enable [he City to pay for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or whenever the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The Reserve Fund contribution will continue until such a time the Reserve Fund balance is approximately one half of the annual costs. The fund may be alEowed to accumulate in anticipation of any unforeseen expenses not included in the yearly maintenance costs. This may include, but is not limited to, street light or traffic signal replacements, repair of damaged improvements due to vandalism, storms and other similar events. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2010/11 P-447 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT General Pursuant to the 1972 Act and Article Xfll D, all parcels that have a special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements and services shall be identified, and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel shall be determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of improvements. The 1972 Act, permits the establishment of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include the public lighting facilities, including traffic signals.. Section 22573 of the 1972 Act requires that maintenance assessments must be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. This Section states: "The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district maybe apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements. Ths determination of whether or not a lot or parcel will benefit from the improvements shall be made pursuant to the Improvement Act of 1911 (Division 7 (commencing with Section 5000) (of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California]. " The 1972 Act also permits the designation of zones of benefit within any individual assessment district if "by reasons or variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive different degrees of benefit from the improvement' (Sec. 22574). Article XIII D, Section 4(a) of the California Constitution limits the amount of any assessment to the proportional special benefit conferred on the property. Article XIII D also provides that publicly owned properties must be assessed unless there is clear and convincing evidence that those properties receive no special benefit from the assessment. Exempted from the assessment would be the areas of public streets, public avenues, public lanes, public roads, public drives, public courts, public alleys, public easements and rights-of-ways, public greenbelts and public parkways. The net amount to be assessed may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels. Proposition 218, approved by the voters in November 1998, requires the City to separate general benefit from special benefit, where only special benefit is assessed. Benefit The maintenance and servicing of the improvements within the District (which are described in the Description of Improvements and Services Section of this report) are for the benefit of the properties within the District, and as such confer a special and direct benefit to parcels within the District by: • improving the livability, safety, appearance, and desirability for properties within the boundaries of the District, and • ensuring that improvements do not reach a state of deterioration or disrepair so as to be materially detrimental to properties within the District, and Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2010/11 P-448 providing for safe vehicular and pedestrian access for properties within the District, and providing beautification, shade and overall enhancement to properties within the District. The above mentioned items affect the assessed property in a way that is particular and distinct from their effect on other parcels and that real property in general and the public at large do not share. They contribute to a specific enhancement of the properties within the District. Since these improvements were installed and are maintained specifically for the properties within the District; only properties within the District receive a special benefit and are assessed for said maintenance. General Benefif In addition to the special benefits received by parcels within the District, there are derivative general benefits that are conferred on parcels outside the boundaries of the District which include: • the safety and visual enhancement of the area to persons or vehicles that may travel through the District. However it has been determined that these benefits are derivative and do not provide a direct benefit to parcels outside of the district that are not being assessed. Method of Assessment Spread Each of the parcels within the District is deemed to receive special benefit from the improvements. Each parcel that has a special benefit conferred upon it as a result of the rc~aintenance and operation of improvements are identified and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel is determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of the improvements. When the District was farmed in 1382, Article XIII D and Proposition 218 had not yet been passed. Upon the passage of Article XIII D and the subsequent passage of the Proposition Omnibus Implementation Act, new rules were put into place. Due to the changes in legal requirements, as property annexed to the District after the passage of the Assessment Law, the description of the method of assessment became more refined, however, the assessment per parcel has remained the same since the 1996197 Fiscal Year. Further, no parcel included in the District formation or annexations prior to when the language was refined, are now being levied differently than they were at the time the District was formed or the parcels were annexed. To assess special benefit appropriately, it is necessary to relate the different type of parcel improvements to each other. The Equivalent Dwelling Unit ("EDU") method of apportionment uses the single family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single family home equals one Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU). Every other land-use is converted to EDUs based on an assessment formula that equates to the property's specific development status, type of development (land-use), and size of the property, as compared to a single family home. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land-use types, as assigned by County use code, to determine each parcel's EDU assignment. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 10 Fiscal Year 2010/11 P-449 Land-Use Equivalent Dwelling Units Pro e T e Coun Use Code EDU Value Multi tier Single Family Residential 1.00 Parcel Multi-family Residential 1.00 Unit Non Residential 2.00 Acre Vacant 2.00 Acre The use of the latest County Assessor's Secured Roll shall be the basis for the Property Type determination and units/acreage assignments, unless better data is available to the City. In addition, if any parcel within the District is identified by [he County Auditor/Controller to be an invalid parcel number for the current fiscal year, the Property Type and EDU assignment shall be based on the correct parcel number and/or new parcel number(s) County use code and subsequent property information. If a single parcel has changed to multiple parcels, the EDU assignment and assessment amount applied to each of the new parcels will be recalculated rather than spread the proportionate share of the original assessment. The following table summarizes the Fiscal Year 2010/11 maximum allowable assessment rates for the District: Property Type (County Use Code) Maximum Allowable Assessment Rate er EDU Actual Assessment Rate er EDU Total Units/Acres Total EDUs Single Family Residential $47.15 $47.15 6,271.00 6,271.00 Multi-family Residential 47.15 47.15 589.00 589.00 Non Residential 47.15 47.15 245.80 491.60 Vacant 47.15 47.15 7.68 15.36 The total amount of maintenance and incidental costs for maintaining the streetlights and traffic signals is assessed to the individual parcels of real property within the District in proportion to the special benefit received by such parcels of real property. The proposed individual assessments are shown on the assessment roll in this report. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 11 Fiscal Year 2010/11 P-450 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM An Assessment Diagram for the District is shown on the following page. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the County Assessor of the County San Bernardino, at the time this report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Engineer's Report. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 12 Fiscal Year 2010/11 P-451 w V 'i /w ,= Q O ~ ~ ~ ~ - - ~ yr .C i ~ , 1 '.........._~_ _.. .. ~ ' i 4.r .L i _. i.. i ny epuertil3l ~~ i ~ J ! ~ w ~ ' -' pe >IaaJ~ Ke4 t_.._.._.._.._.._ ..~..~ ny Ja;say~oa i --~ ny ua>lipiW a ..~__ ~ fY N m ~ C N R 0] 2 _. ny ~(JJay~ v N C J C1J ~ ~ s 3 m o 0 li Q N ~E J M ~ ~ !] ~ U c~iJ ~ ^~ J 1.~ d ~~ ^~ ® ~ 0 0 N N O nt/ ~Se~ lf) ny epueMg3 ny Ja;sayooy i i I B L .... _ _ . `. +" ~ ny uewllaH .•'~~ t /' L ~ ny pJeRaui/~ ,. •~ 2 ~ ..~Y•Y.:,.,..,~..m.......~~ ny anOJ~ (~ C m ~ VI L J = 3 t rn ~ t O c0 FD li ~[ets~*.~raJ a iPnF~f ~~4gag~pp 9j !~~~a'dyfC€ f $ ~ fl ~§jad~~8&f F ~~1?~~. : e[:B~ge ¢ P-452 ASSESSMENT ROLL Assessment Roll The assessment roll is a listing of the assessment for Fiscal Year 2010/11 apportioned to each lot or parcel, as shown on the last equalized roll of the Assessor of the County of San Bernardino. The following tables summarize the Fiscal Year 2010111 maximum and actual assessments for the District: Property Type Coun Use Code Maximum Allowable Assessment Rate er EDU Total Units/Acres Total EDUs Maximum Allowable Assessment Single Family Residential $47.15 6,271.00 6,271.00 $295,677.65 Multi-family Residential 47.15 589.00 589.00 27,771.35 Non Residential 47.15 245.80 491.60 23,178.94 Vacant 47.15 7.68 15.36 724.22 TOTALS 7,t 13.48 7,366.96 $347,352.16 Property Type Coun Use Code Actual Assessment Rate er EDU Total UnitslAcres Total EDUs Actual Assessment Single Family Residential $47.15 6,271.00 6,271.00 $295,677.65 Multi-family Residential 47.15 589.00 589.00 27,771.35 Non Residential 47.15 245.80 491.60 23,178.94 Vacant 47.15 7.68 15.36 724.22 TOTALS 7,113.48 7,366.96 $347,352.16 A copy of the full assessment roll is available for review in the City Clerk's office. Annexations The following annexations- are effective for the 2010/11 Fiscal Year: Assessor's Parcel Annexation Total Total Property Type Number Date Pro ect UnitslAcres EDUs Coun Use Code 1089-011-06 6/3/2009 DRC2007-00455 5.08 10.16 Non Residential Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 13 Fiscal Year 2010/11 P-453 Revised Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2010/2011 City of Rancho Cucamonga Street Lighting iViaintenance district No. 4 (Terra Vista Planned Community) P-454 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0.4 (TERRA VISTA PLANNED COMMUNITY) 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Phone: 909.477.2740 Fax: 909.477.2741 CITY COUNCIL Donald J. Kurth, Mayor L. Dennis Michael, Mayor Pro Tem Rex Gutierrez, Council Member Sam Spagnolo, Council Member Diane Williams, Council Member CITY STAFF John R. Gillison, Assistant City Manager Linda D: Daniels, Deputy City Manager William Wittkopf, Public Works Director Jeff Barnes, Park and Landscape Superintendent Ingrid Y. Bruce, GIS/Special Districts Manager Christopher Bopko, Management Analyst III P-455 TABLE OF CONTENTS ENGINEER'S LETTER INTRODUCTION 7 3 Reason for Assessment .............................................................................................3 Process for Annual Assessment .................................................................................3 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS 5 Description of the Boundaries of the District ...............................................................5 Description of Improvements and Services ................................................................5 Map of Improvements .................................................................................................5 ESTIMATE OF COSTS G District Budget ............................................................................................................6 Defin :ions of Budget Items .........................................................................................7 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT 9 General ....................................................................................................................... 9 Special Benefit ...........................................................................................................9 General Benefit ........................................................................................................10 Method of Assessment Spread ................................................................................10 ASSESSMENT D/AGRAM 72 ASSESSMENT ROLL 73 P-456 ENGINEER'S LETTER WHEREAS, on ,the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga (the "City"), under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 (the "1972 Act") adopted its Resolution No. _, a Resolution Initiating Proceedings for the Levy of Annual Assessments for Street Light Maintenance District No. 4 (Terra Vsta Planned Community) (the "District"); and WHEREAS, the Resolution Initiating Proceedings directed NBS to prepare and file an Engineer's Report for Fiscal Year 2010/11 pursuant to the requirements of the 1972 Act. The Engineer's Report presents the plans and specifications describing the general nature, location and extent of the improvements to be maintained, an estimate of the costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements for the District for the referenced fiscal year, a diagram for the District, showing the area and properties proposed to be assessed, and an assessment of the estimated costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing the improvements, assessing the net amount upon all assessable lots andJor parcels within the District in proportion to the special benefit received; and NOW THEREFORE, the following assessment is proposed to be authorized in order to pay the estimated costs of maintenance, operation and servicing of the improvements to be paid by the assessable real property within the boundaries of the District in proportion to the special benefit received. The following table summarizes the proposed assessment. SUMMARY OF ASSESSMENT Fiscal Year 2010111 Total Estimated Assessment $156,277.43 Plus Anticipated Delinquency Penalty 14 652.57 Total Estimated Revenue $170,930.00 Plus Reserve Fund Contribution 290 410.00 Total Expenditure Budget $461,340.00 Total District EDU Count 5,396.32 Actual Assessment per EDU $28.96 Maximum Allowable Assessment per EDU $28.96 In making the assessments contained herein pursuant to the 1972 Act: I have identified all parcels which will have a special benefit conferred upon them from the improvements described in the Special Benefit Section of this Engineer's Report (the "Specially Benefited Parcels"). For particulars as to the identification of said parcels, reference is made to the Assessment Diagram, a copy of which is included in this Engineer's Report. 1. I have evaluated the costs and expenses of the improvements upon the Specially Benefited Parcels. In making such evaluation: Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 4 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2010/11 P-457 a. The proportionate special benefit derived by each. Specially Benefited Parcel from the improvements was determined in relationship to the entirety of the maintenance costs of the improvements; b. No assessment has been imposed on any Specially Benefited Parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on such parcel from the improvements; and c. Any general benefits from the improvements have been separated from the special benefits and only special benefits have been assessed. I, the undersigned, respectfully submit the enclosed Engineer's Report and, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, the Engineer's Report, Assessments, and the Assessment Diagram herein have been prepared and computed in accordance with the order of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Assessment Law. Mark A. Steuer, City Engineer Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 4 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2010/11 P-458 INTRODUCTION Reason for Assessment Approval of the assessment covered by this Engineer's Report will generate the revenue necessary to: Provide for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements described in this Engineer's Report. Maintenance may include but is not limited to, all of the following: the repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement. Servicing means the furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operating and servicing of any improvement. Servicing shall also include vehicle, equipment, capital improvements and administrative costs associated with the annual administration and operation of the District. Process for Annual Assessment The City cannot levy and collect annual assessments within the District without complying with the procedures specified in the 1972 Act. On an annual basis, an Engineer's Report must be prepared which contains a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the district. The City Council must also adopt a resolution of intention which: • Declares the intention of the City Council to levy and collect assessments within the assessment district for the fiscal year stated therein. • Generally describes the existing and proposed improvements and any substantial changes proposed to be made in existing improvements. • Refers to the assessment district by its distinctive designation and indicate the general location of the district. • Refers to the report of the engineer, on file with the clerk, for a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the district. • Gives notice of the time and place for public hearing by the City Council on the levy of the proposed assessment. • States whether the assessment is proposed to increase from the previous year. If the assessments are to be levied in the same or lesser amounts than the maximum assessment amount approved, the clerk shall give notice by causing the resolution of intention to be published. Any interested person may, prior to the conclusion of the public hearing, fle a written protest which shall state all grounds of objection. The protest shall contain a description sufficient to identify the property owned by the property owner filing the protest. During the course or upon conclusion of the hearing, the City Council may order changes in any of the matters provided in the report, including changes in the improvements, any zones within the assessment district, and the proposed diagram or the proposed assessment. The City Council, upon conclusion of the public hearing must then adopt a resolution confirming the diagram and assessment, either as originally proposed or as changed by it. The adoption of the resolution shall constitute the levy of an assessment for the fiscal year referred to in the assessment. If the assessment to be levied exceeds the maximum assessment amount previously approved, the City must comply with the procedures specified in Article XIII D and Proposition 218. The voters in the State of Califomia in November 1996 added Article XIII D to the Califomia Constitution imposing Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 4 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 3 Fiscal Year 2010111 P-459 among other requirements, the necessity for the City to conduct an assessment ballot procedure to enable the owners of each property on which assessments are proposed to be enacted or increased, the opportunity to express their support for, or opposition to the proposed assessment or increase in such assessment. The basic steps of the assessment ballot procedure are outlined below. The City must prepare a Notice of Public Hearing ("Notice'), which describes, along with other mandated information, the reason for the proposed assessments, and to provide a date and time of a public hearing to be held on the matter. The City must also prepare an assessment ballot, which clearly gives the property owner the ability to sign and mark their assessment ballot either in favor of, or in opposition to the proposed assessment. The Notice and assessment ballot are mailed to each affected property owner within the District a minimum of 45 days prior to the public hearing date as shown in the Notice. The City may also hold community meetings with the property owners to discuss the issues facing the District and to answer property owner questions directly. After the Notice and assessment ballot are mailed, property owners are given until the close of the public hearing, stated in the Notice, to return their signed and marked assessment ballot. During the public hearing, property owners are given the opportunity to address the City Council and ask questions or voice their concerns. At the public hearing, the returned assessment ballots received prior to the close of the public hearing are tabulated, weighted by the proposed assessment amount on each property and the results are announced by the City Council. Article XIII D provides that if, as a result of the assessment ballet proceeding, a majority protest is found to exist, the City Council shall not have the authority to levy and collect the assessments as proposed. A majority protest exists if the assessments represented by ballots submitted in opposition exceed those submitted in favor of the assessment. All returned ballots are tabulated and weighted according to the financial obligation of each particular parcel. If there is no majority protest as described above, the City Council may approve the proposed assessments. If there is a majority protest, as described above, the City will not levy and collect any assessments. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 4 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2010111 P-460 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS The District provides for the administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing of various improvements located within the public right-of-way and dedicated easements within the boundaries of the District. Description of the Boundaries of the District The District is located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California. The boundaries of the District are generally described as that area of the City known as the Terra Vista Planned Community, which is generally bounded by Haven Avenue on the west, Baseline Road on the north, Foothill Boulevard on the south and Rochester Avenue on the east. Reference is also made to the Assessment Diagram included in this Report. Description of Improvements and Services The improvements are the maintenance and servicing of street lights, traffic signals and appurtenant facilities throughout the District. The maintenance and servicing includes, but is not limited to, furnishing electric current for public lighting facilities including street lights and traffic signals, and associated appurtenant facilities. Services include personnel, materials, contracting services, utilities, and all necessary costs associated with the maintenance, replacement and repair required to keep the improvements in operational and satisfactory condition. In addition, it is the City's intention to continue to use cost effective materials, in order to lower expenses of the District. Map of Improvements The following page shows the map of street light and traffic signal improvements to be maintained using District funds. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 4 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2010!11 ~ P- 1 - ` o ~ z. o nvadisa ooa $ • ROCHESTER • i~. € ~ r • F F • la an no •n s aoo ~ 6. E P d o • • TY P o i m 0 at ld dl J~ g~ l aX • o d 3 NOO • dV • I ~ • ~ °'~ I ~ +l Ol'JNIH ~ • AM OLL LLSN O S • • O~ ~ r a rc e • ~ 10 so d ~ • ' O ~ ~ 2 OP ld) VWI a3 Ep.S • y `~o eJr F m ~ Z Qp.y ~.~o~ •2 ~0..~ • Y'- 0 • p~ [y A: II11 ~ w Q 5~ S °~. ~~ v/ Yi W O K W • • O • ~ ~5 •• O~ J• P ~: R ® ~ f a v w b~ O di ~ ye' fl~. Z ~ ~~ F o ` w o ,I ~' 1N ~O' • 'i s ~,~ Wi • ~ , m N S~ • 0 O, • L ~ li fed ~` ~ q ~ f >y Q • • 0 1 Ni _ w, 1 •1S y~~ ~ ~~~ V ` ~' • /~~ ~~/ W ~ ~- _ . Atl N3NIllIW • Q • U 1~~ i~ r • • • 4 OQ • O K = i •wVf ~ = • M A P p 5 [pc o ci O p ,. fIt{ f~ I ~ • '' No P _ µM E 7 tl3dld0 S q •y !~ C , w m • o • O N FAIR O lE tOOl • Q, M • ! S ~~pq }~ vI 1d M31nN 3 • • ~ J ~ ;( ' • • O J • • _ o '~ ~ ~ P ~p=~ k { F ' • " R ° W G) h. ~d M •C • 6 ~ • • O m q W _ /~ V( v+ m • J O ~ • 7' Z • • • e F L y < w • • • a • i w s • O • d dl0a J e • • Ifi N • ' • • • e a • ~ • • • ° • FE iG • • n93J~ad • ~ ~~^~ .z 4 l • o ldA :XO U ~ • • ~! s • • ~ ; z ~ -y • • ~: ~ v i i i • y W '7. • x''16 d %i gq EA _ gg P K , • vi ¢ ~ pp s [ fig„ U AYB B • 4 " • ~ 4 {} ~~1 ~~$" 35 ~`"r ~' i L z M ow Y ~ • ~ v" ~ • _ o [ 2 [ } ` ~~%'~~~ F~ ~~~ 3N1a30ry Atl ON 3 tlA oy rc 2 ~ ° h ~ • ~ ( a€ ~IF 6 ~B~ a~~F ~' t~ b1 U 1 O • . [[`t F {g E;. y ~ ' ~ Po ~ • ~ e ~s F , 6V S . o ~ m • e O ~ • k i E~°} !tt~: [€ $g[ €~k~ 3 ~ ~'~ } £ 1' ~ atl nvH d ~ • .s~ ~~ [ Et F [[ ~ • w • ~,I~P.NyS' -r~a£7~C~?.4`aL'~ e . _ ~ oe -RCS-~:+~E* c~ • HAVEN _.a~~':~'ss.~. --v-•aP -~ . _. ~-•.L~~S~%;s _'a~F•.a~i:;, P-462 ESTIMATE OF COSTS The estimated costs of administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing the improvements as described in the Plans and Specifications are summarized below. Each year, as part of the assessment district levy calculation process, the costs and expenses are reviewed and the annual costs are projected for the following fiscal year. District Estimated 2010/11 Bud et Personnel Services Regular Payroll $21,660.00 Part-time Salaries 0.00 Frinoe Benefits 10.180.00 Subtotal Personnel $31,840.00 Operations and Maintenance Training $180.00 Membership Dues 30.00 Ooerafions and Maintenance 4,940.00 Equipment Operations and Maintenance 500.00 Contract Services 14,670.00 Utilities Telephone Utilities 0.00 Electric Utilities 127,200.00 Assessment Administration 21,050.00 General Overhead 10,930.00 Interfund Allocation 0.00 Subtotal Operations and Maintenance $179,500.00 Capital Expenditures Capital Protects $250 000.00 Subtotal Capital Expenditures $250,000.00 Total Dis~ict Expenditure Budget $461,340.00 Total Estimated Assessment - 5156,277.43 Plus Anticipated Delinquency Penalty 14.652.57 Total Estimated Revenue $170,930.00 Plus Operating Reserve Fund Contribution 290.410.00 Total Expenditure Budget $461,340.00 Total Estimated Assessment $156,277.43 Total District EDU Count 5,396.32 Actual Assessment per EDU -Fiscal Year 2010/11 $28.96 Maximum Allowable Assessment er EDU -Fiscal Year 2010!11 $28.96 The maximum allowable assessment per EDU listed in the District budget above, is the amount which was approved in 1996/97 and subsequent District annexations. Each year, prior to the assessments being placed on the tax roll, the City will review the budget and determine the amount needed to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 4-City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2010/11 P-463 maintain the improvements for the upcoming fiscal year. The actual assessment per EDU will be based on the total amount of funds needed to maintain the improvements in a satisfactory and healthy condition. The actual assessment amount may be lower than the maximum allowable assessment; however it may not exceed the maximum unless the increase is approved by the property owners in accordance with Proposition 218. It is the intent of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to maintain an Operating Reserve which shall not exceed the estimated costs of maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or when the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The reserve balance information for the District is as follows: Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2010 Reserve Fund Balance $781,379.36 Operating Reserve Contribution -Fiscal Year 2010/11 (290,410.00) Operating Reserve Collection -Fiscal Year 2010/11 0.00 Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2011 Reserve Fund Balance $490,969.36 Definitions of Budget Items The following defiriitions describe the costs and expenses included in the District Budget Personnel Services Regular Salaries: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all full-time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Part Time Salaries: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all part time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Fringe Benefits: This item includes the benefits available to City employees: health care, vacation, sick time, and retirement fund. Operations and Maintenance Contract Services: GIS services for maintaining the street lights and traffic signals database. This is a combination of field and office work and is split evenly between all of the City's Street Light Maintenance Districts. Membership Dues: ISMA Certification. The cost is split evenly between all of the City's Street Light and Maintenance Districts. Utilities -Electric: This item includes the costs to furnish electricity required for the operation and maintenance of the street lights and traffic signals. Assessment Administration: This item includes the cost to all particular departments and staff of the City, and consultants for providing the administration, coordination and management of District services, operations, and incidental expenses related to the District. This item also includes creation of an annual engineer's report, resolutions and placing the assessment amounts onto the County tax roll each year, along with responding to any public inquiries and future Proposition 218 balloting proceedings. General Overhead: This item includes the costs of all departments and staff of the City for providing the coordination of District services, inspections, annual bid management, responding to public concerns, public education, accounting, auditing and procedural matters associated with the District. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 4 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2010/11 P-464 This item also includes an allocation for general City staff time for administrative functions and systems that provide for a functional and operational assessment district within the City's administrative structure, Interfund Allocation: This item is for night time field verification of street lights working and daytime matching of pole numbers against invoices received to ensure accurate billing. The budget is divided evenly between all of the City's Street Light Maintenance Districts. Capital Expenditures: Capital Projects: This item includes new improvements to further enhance the level and quality of service provided within the boundaries of the District. This may include new or replacement street lights or traffic signals and appurtenant facilities. Operating Reserve Collection: Operating Reserve Collection: This item includes the amount to be collected to maintain reserves to enable the City to pay for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or whenever the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The Reserve Fund contribution will continue until such a time the Reserve Fund balance is approximately one half of the annual costs. The fund may be allowed to accumulate in anticipation of any unforeseen expanses not included in the yearly maintenance costs. This may include, but is not limited to, street light or traffic signal replacements, repair of damaged improvements due to vandalism, storms and other similar events. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 4 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2010/11 P-465 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT General Pursuant to the 1972 Act and Article XIII D, alt parcels that have a special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements and services shall be identified, and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel shall be determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of improvements. The 1972 Act, permits the establishment of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include the public lighting facilities, including traffic signals.. Section 22573 of the 1972 Act requires that maintenance assessments must be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. This Section states: "The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements. The defermination of whether or not a lot or game! will benefit from the improvements shall be made pursuant to the Improvement Act of 19f 1 (Division 7 (commencing with Section 5000) (of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California]." The 1972 Act also permits the designation of zones of benefit within any individual assessment district if "by reasons or variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive different degrees of benefit from the improvement" (Sec. 22574). Article XIII D, Section 4(a) of the California Constitution limits the amount of any assessment to the proportional special benefit conferred on the property. Article XIII D also provides that publicly owned properties must be assessed unless there is clear and convincing evidence that those properties receive no special benefit from the assessment. Exempted from the assessment would be the areas of public streets, public avenues, public lanes, public roads, public drives, public courts, public alleys, public easements and rights-of-ways, public greenbelts and public parkways. The net amount to be assessed may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels. Proposition 218, approved by the voters in November 1996, requires the City to separate general benefit from special benefit, where.only special benefit is assessed. Benefit The maintenance and servicing of the improvements within the District (which are described in the Description of Improvements and Services Section of this report) are for the benefit of the properties within the District, and as such confer a special and direct benefit to parcels within the District by: improving the livability, safety, appearance, and desirability for properties within the boundaries of the District, and ensuring that improvements do not reach a state of deterioration or disrepair so as to be materially detrimental to properties within the District, and Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 4 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2010/11 P-466 providing for safe vehicular and pedestrian access for properties within the District, and providing beautification, shade and overall enhancement to properties within the District. The above mentioned items affect the assessed property in a way that is particular and distinct from their effect on other parcels and that real property in general and the public at large do not share. They contribute to a specific enhancement of the properties within the District. Since these improvements were installed and are maintained specifically for the properties within the District; only properties within the District receive a special benefit and are assessed for said maintenance. General Benefit in addition to the special benefits received by parcels within the District, there are derivative general benefts that are conferred on parcels outside the boundaries of the District which include: • the safety and visual enhancement of the area to persons or vehicles that may travel through the District. However it has been determined that these benefits are derivative and do not prcvide a direct benefit to parcels outside of the district that are not being assessed. Method of Assessment Spread Each of the parcels within the District is deemed to receive special benefit from the improvements. Each parcel that has a special benefit conferred upon it as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements are identified and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel is determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of the improvements. When the District was formed in 1984, Article XIII C and Proposition 218 had not yei been passed. Upon the passage of Article XIII D and the subsequent passage of the Proposition Omnibus Implementation Act, new rules were put into place. Due to the changes in legal requirements, as property annexed to the District after the passage of the Assessment Law, the description of the method of assessment became more refined, however, the assessment per parcel has remained the same since the 1996/97 Fiscal Year. Further, no parcel included in the District formation or annexations prior to when the language was refined, are now being levied differently than they were at the time the District was formed or the parcels were annexed. To assess special benefit appropriately, it is necessary to relate the different type of parcel improvements to each other. The Equivalent Dwelling Unit ("EDU") method of apportionment uses the single family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single family home equals one Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU). Every other land-use is converted to EDUs based on an assessment formula that equates to the property's specific development status, type of development (land-use), and size of the property, as compared to a single family home. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land-use types, as assigned by County use code, to determine each parcel's EDU assignment. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 4 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 10 Fiscal Year 2010/11 P-467 Land-Use Equivalent Dwellinn Units Pro ert T e Coun Use Code EDU Value Multi tier Single Family Residential 1.00 Parcel Multi-family Residential 0.50 Unit Non Residential 2.00 Acre Vacant 2.00 Acre The use of the latest County Assessor's Secured Roll shall be the basis for the Property Type determination and units/acreage assignments, unless better data is available to the City. In addition, if any parcel within the District is identified by the County Auditor/Controller to be an invalid parcel number for the current fiscal year, the Property Type and EDU assignment shall be based on the correct parcel number and/or new parcel number(s) County use code and subsequent property information. If a single parcel has changed to multiple parcels, the EDU assignment and assessment amount applied to each of the new parcels will be recalculated rather than spread the proportionate share of the original assessment. The following table summarizes the Fiscal Year 2010111 maximum allowable assessment rates for the District: Property Type (County Use Code) Maximum Allowable Assessment Rate er EDU Actual Assessment Rate er EDU Total UnitslAcres Total EDUs Single Family Residential $28.96 $28.96 2,652.00 2.652.00 Mufti-family Residential 28.96 28.96 4,502.00 2,251.00 Non Residential 28.96 28.96 191.52 383.04 Vacant 28.96 26.96 55.14 110.28 The total amount of maintenance and incidental costs for maintaining the streetlights and traffic signals is assessed to the individual parcels of real property within the District in proportion to the special benefit received by such parcels of real property. The proposed individual assessments are shown on the assessment roll in this report. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 4 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 11 Fiscal Year 2010/11 P-468 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM An Assessment Diagram for the District is shown on the following page. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the County Assessor of the County San Bernardino, at the time this report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Engineer's Report. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 4 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 12 Fiscal Year 2010/11 ~F.1 V •- *./ .y ^~ i '~ C y.+ J d ny ua~!II!W ny /ways a d C J m N N Q] O LL g ~aa~~ Xea N .~ J 7 ~ U ~ 1 J ^r~ O ._.._.._ i nb' 3se3 in ~ v ----e..._..~._.._ ny epuenn!;3 i '. 0 N N O ny ~a;sayooa ! ~ i ~ ~ ' ny ~a;sayooa . ;..__, i ~ .. . 1 ...~. .. ...... __...L... . _.._ ! ny ua~!II!W i i n uane ~ i ~ _.! I i i ,j i ny uewllaH i _.{-..... ~.. i i i i ~S uellawe~ j ----- ~ - .._ 1 i ~ ' _.• ~ •• c d ~ ~ C N m VO Z ., L Lh i 1 v:. 1 L~ .._;-.ti.: ..__.'. _f ny anal ~ _ ; r L O N m LL ~i~ ~~S J N N ~~ ~~ oo: P-470 ASSESSMENT ROLL Assessment Roll The assessment roll is a listing of the assessment for Fiscal Year 2010/11 apportioned to each lot or parcel, as shown on the last equalized roll of the Assessor of the County of San Bernardino. The following tables summarize the Fiscal Year 2010/11 maximum and actual assessments for the District: Property Type Coun Use Code Maximum Allowable Assessment Rate er EDU Total UnitslAcres Total EDUs Maximum Allowable Assessment Single Family Residential $28.96 2,652.00 2,652.00 $76,801.92 Multi-family Residential 26.96 4,502.00. 2,251.00 65,188.96 Non Residential 28.96 191.52 383.04 11,092.84 Vacant 28.96 55.14 110.28 3,193.71 TOTALS 7,473.93 5,396.32 $156,277.43 Property Type Coun Use Code Actual Assessment Rate er EDU Total UnitslAcres Total EDUs Actual Assessment Single Family Residential $28.96 2,652.00 2,652.00 $76,801.92 Multi-family Residential 28.96 4,502.00 2,251.00 65,188.96 Non Residential 28.96 191.52 383.04 11,092.84 Vacant 28.96 55.14 110.28 3,193.71 TOTALS 7,473.93 5,396.32 $156,277.43 A copy of the full assessment roll is available for review in the City Clerk's office. Annexations The following annexations are effective for the 2010/11 Fiscal Year: Assessor's Parcel Annexation Total Total Property Type Number Date Pro'ect Units/Acres EDUs (Count Use Code 107722-01, 1077-422-46, 1/7!2009 PM18797 14.97 29.94 Non Residential 1077-422-95, 1077-422-96 0227-532-16 1017/2009 PM18710 I 241.00 241.00 Multi-family Residential Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 4 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 13 Fiscal Year 2010/11 P-471 Revised Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2010/2011 City of Rancho Cucamonga Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 5 (Caryn Planned Community) P-472 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 5 (CARYN PLANNED COMMUNITY) 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Phone: 909.477.2740 Fax: 909.477.2741 cITY couNCIL Donald J. Kurth, Mayor L. Dennis Michael, Mayor Pro Tem Rex Gutierrez, Council Member Sam Spagnolo, Council Member Diane Williams, Council Member CITY STAFF John R. Gillison, Assistant City Manager Linda D. Daniels, Deputy City Manager William Wittkopf, Public Works Director Jeff Barnes, Park and Landscape Superintendent Ingrid Y. Bruce, GISlSpecial Districts Manager Christopher Bopko, Management Analyst III P-473 TABLE OF CONTENTS ENGINEER'S LETTER INTRODUCTION 1 3 Reason for Assessment .............................................................................................3 Process for Annual Assessment .................................................................................3 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS 5 Description of the Boundaries of the District ...............................................................5 Description of Improvements and Services ................................................................5 Map of Improvements .................................................................................................5 ESTIMATE OF COSTS 6 District Budget ............................................................................................................6 Definitions of Budget Items .........................................................................................7 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT 9 General .......................................................................................................................9 Special Benefit ..........................................................................................................9 General Benefit ........................................................................................................10 Method of Assessment Spread ................................................................................10 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM ASSESSMENT ROLL 12 13 Assessment Roll .......................................................................................................13 Annexations ..............................................................................................................13 P-474 ENGINEER'S LETTER WHEREAS, on ,the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga (the "City"), under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 (the "1972 AcY) adopted its Resolution No. _, a Resolution Initiating Proceedings for the Levy of Annual Assessments for Street Light Maintenance District No. 5 (Caryn Planned Community) (the "District"); and WHEREAS, the Resolution Initiating Proceedings directed NBS to prepare and file an Engineer's Report for Fiscal Year 2010/11 pursuant to the requirements of the 1972 Act. The Engineer's Report presents the plans and specifications describing the general nature, location and extent of the improvements to be maintained, an estimate of the costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements for the District for the referenced fiscal year, a diagram for the District, showing the area and properties proposed to be assessed, and an assessment of the estimated costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing the improvements, assessing the net amount upon all assessable lots and/or parcels within the District in proportion to the special benefit received; and NOW THEREFORE, the following assessment is proposed to be authorized in order to pay the estimated costs of maintenance, operation and servicing of the improvements to be paid by the assessable real property within the boundaries of the District in proportion to the special benefit received. The following table summarizes the proposed assessment. SUMMARY OF ASSESSMENT Fiscal Year 2010/11 Total Estimated Assessment $44,045.80 Plus Anticipated Delinquency Penalty 785.80 Total Estimated Revenue $43,260.00 Plus Reserve Fund Contribution 37 440.00 Total Expenditure Budget $80,700.00 Total District EDU Count 1,273.00 Actual Assessment per EDU 834.60 Maximum Allowable Assessment per EDU $34.60 In making the assessments contained herein pursuant to the 1972 Act: I have identified all parcels which will have a special benefit conferred upon them from the improvements described in the Special Benefit Section of this Engineer's Report (the "Specially Benefited Parcels"). For particulars as to the identification of said parcels, reference is made to the Assessment Diagram, a copy of which is included in this Engineer's Report. I have evaluated the costs and expenses of the improvements upon the Specially Benefited Parcels. In making such evaluation: Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 5-City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2010111 P-475 a. The proportionate special benefit derived by each Specially Benefrted Parcel from the improvements was determined in relationship to the entirety of the maintenance costs of the improvements; b. No assessment has been imposed on any Specially Benefited Parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on such parcel from the improvements; and c. Any general benefits from the improvements have been separated from the special benefits and only special benefits have been assessed. I, the undersigned, respectfully submit the enclosed Engineer's Report and, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, the Engineer's Report, Assessments, and the Assessment Diagram herein have been prepared and computed in accordance with the order of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Assessment Law. Mark A. Steuer, City Engineer Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 5 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2010/11 P-476 INTRODUCTION Reason for Assessment Approval of the assessment covered by this Engineer's Report will generate the revenue necessary to: Provide for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements described in this Engineer's Report. Maintenance may include but is not limited to, all of the following: the repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement. Servicing means the furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operating and servicing of any improvement. Servicing shalt also include vehicle, equipment, capital improvements and administrative costs associated with the annual administration and operation of the District. Process for Annual Assessment The City cannot levy and collect annual assessments within the District without complying with the procedures specified in the 1972 Act. On an annual basis, an Engineer's Report must be prepared which contains a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the district. The City Council must also adopt a resolution of intention which: • Declares the intention of the City Council to levy and collect assessments within the assessment district for the fiscal year stated therein. • Generally describes the existing and proposed improvements and any substantial changes proposed to be made in existing improvements. • Refers to the assessment district by its distinctive designation and indicate the general location of the district. • Refers to the report of the engineer, on file with the clerk, for a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the district. • Gives notice of the time and place for public hearing by the City Council on the levy of the proposed assessment. States whether the assessment is proposed to increase from the previous year. If the assessments are to be levied in the same or lesser amounts than the maximum assessment amount approved, the clerk shall give notice by causing the resolution of intention to be published. Any interested person may, prior to the conclusion of the public hearing, file a written protest which shall state all grounds of objection. The protest shall contain a description sufficient to identify the property owned by the property owner filing the protest. During the course or upon conclusion of the hearing, the City Council may order changes in any of the matters provided in the report, including changes in the improvements, any zones within the assessment district, and the proposed diagram or the proposed assessment. The City Council, upon conclusion of the public hearing must then adopt a resolution confirming the diagram and assessment, either as originally proposed or as changed by it. The adoption of the resolution shall constitute the levy of an assessment for the fiscal year referred to in the assessment. If the assessment to be levied exceeds the maximum assessment amount previously approved, the City must comply with the procedures specifed in Article XIII D and Proposition 218. The voters in the State of California in November 1996 added Article XIII D to the California Constitution imposing, Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 5-City of Rancho Cucamonga 3 Fiscal Year 2010111 P-477 among other requirements, the necessity for the City to conduct an assessment ballot procedure to enable the owners of each property on which assessments are proposed to be enacted or increased, the opportunity to express their support for, or opposition to the proposed assessment or increase in such assessment. The basic steps of the assessment ballot procedure are outlined below. The City must prepare a Notice of Public Hearing ("Notice"), which describes, along with other mandated information, the reason for the proposed assessments, and to provide a date and time of a public hearing to be held on the matter. The City must also prepare an assessment ballot, which clearly gives the property owner the ability to sign and mark their assessment ballot either in favor of, or in opposition to the proposed assessment. The Notice and assessment ballot are mailed to each affected property owner within the District a minimum of 45 days prior to the public hearing date as shown in the Notice. The City may also hold community meetings with the property owners to discuss the issues facing the District and to answer property owner questions directly. After the Notice and assessment ballot are mailed, property owners are given until the close of the public hearing, stated in the Notice, to return their signed and marked assessment ballot. During the public hearing, property owners are given the opportunity to address the City Council and ask questions or voice their concerns. At the public hearing, the returned assessment ballots received prior to the close of the public hearing are tabulated, weighted by the proposed assessment amount on each property and the results are announced by the City Council. Article XIII D provides that if, as a result of the assessment ballot proceeding, a majority protest is found to exist, the City Council shall not have the authority to levy and collect the assessments as proposed. A majority protest exists if the assessments represented by ballots submitted in opposition exceed those submitted in favor of the assessment. All returned ballots are tabulated and weighted according to the financial obligation of each particular parcel. If there is no majority protest as described above, the City Council may approve the proposed assessments. If there is a majority protest, as described above, the City will not levy and collect any assessments. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 5 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2010111 P-478 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS The District provides for the administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing of various improvements located within the public rightof-way and dedicated easements within the boundaries of the District. Description of the Boundaries of the District The District is located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California. The boundaries of the District are generally described as that area of the City known as the Caryn Planned Community, which is generally bounded by Milliken Avenue on the west, Banyan Street on the north, Highland Avenue on the south and Rochester Avenue on the east. Reference is also made to the Assessment Diagram included in this Report. Description of Improvements and Services The improvements are the maintenance and servicing of street lights, traffic signals and appurtenant facilities throughout the District. The maintenance and servicing includes, but is not limited to, furnishing electric current for public lighting facilities including street lights and traffic signals, and associated appurtenant facilities. Services include personnel, materials, contracting services, utilities, and all necessary costs associated with the maintenance, replacement and repair required to keep the improvements in operational and satisfactory condition. In addition, it is the City's intention to continue to use cost effective materials, in order to lower expenses of the District. Map of Improvements The following page shows the map of street light and traffic signal improvements to be maintained using District funds. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 5-City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2D10/11 ________ ZU iO /I f~ i I ~~^ 1.`~wi'.c. •X~.~~ ~:ir=`~: ~ .u .. ~~ i r a ¢ F co ~- m• ® a c`a~~~ m~v~YA tl Nf1 ~ • ~ • O a • i a • o o•~ ' S~ , ~~s N ~ S N N J V ~ a N l i 1 ~ N31S3HDOtl • • ++ ~ ~ ~ ~ i Y/ ~ U V- I ;j a o • t ~ p .a Z ~ F E W U o O ~ ~ • > ~ W ~ i j ~ ~ ~ • . (S L Q $ s• ~ H ~ ~ ~ G v • • w ~ W4 ~ / ~ • . U W O VI K r 6+ i 3 ~ c `r ~ ~ w ~ • g w i ~ ~ C N • • ~ s Q F \ ~ N ~ U U : • ~• ~ ~ / U ~~~ W / ~ •\Y \y l 6 y ~¢ ¢ t I ~~ h e w = .~.~ I ~ ~ • ~ . I ~ = ~ ~ z rv w a a ~S _ f t ~ ~~ ~ W E• c "' w 1 ~\ d Z y Q _ I ~ ~ • r Y O ~ ~I u m ~ ~ J v Y ~t ~oiP,~ y ~ n I I ~F, W ~N i d 0 o `< Y W < v a 5 ~ /. O d Ynd M } i ~ m ~ ~ i y _ 1 ~ ~ 5 6 g o Q • ~ F j 1 N ~ a_ Atl N3NIllIW A A 1' tlU~ '~ / NI • G~ ' • p ~ l QN113 y~ ~' ~ dO ~ • • y S o N ~ ~ • ~'e }pf 4 {1 i F ~`' ~ F ~~~F~ ~i~tt~~~}~~ rc m l NINNOW N9lp ~d i [ o. [r F, =t ~t((Fle i(tiS i~lf Ft € t Fj~t~l1~ 5 2 !! ( ~ F 1 ( ( P-480 ESTIMATE OF COSTS The estimated costs of administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing the improvements as described in the Plans and Specifications are summarized below. Each year, as part of the assessment district levy calculation process, the costs and expenses are reviewed and the annual costs are projected for the following fiscal year. Disfrict Budget Estimated 2010/11 Bud et Personnel Services Regular Payroll $6,770.00 Part-time Salaries 0.00 Fringe Benefits 3.180.00 Subtotal Personnel ~ $9,950.00 Operations and Maintenance Training $180.C0 Membership Dues 30.00 Operations and Maintenance 7,440.00 Equipment Operations and Maintenance 0.00 Contrail Services 0.00 Utilities Telephone Utilities 0.00 Electric Utilities 53,000.00 Assessment Administration 7,020.00 General Overhead 3,080.00 Intertund Allocation 0.00 Subtotal Operations and Maintenance $70,750.00 Capital Expenditures Caoital Proieils 0.00 Subtotal Capital Expenditures $0.00 Total District Expenditure Budget $80,700.00 Total Estimated Assessment $44,045.80 Less Anticipated Delinquencies 78S 5.8~ Total Estimated Revenue $43,260.OD Plus Operating Reserve Fund Contdbution 37.440.00 Total Expenditure Budget $80,700.00 Total Estimated Assessment $44,045.60 Total District EDU Count 1,273.00 Actual Assessment per EDU -Fiscal Year 2010/11 $34.60 Maximum Allowable Assessment er EDU -Fiscal Year 2010/11 $34.60 The maximum allowable assessment per EDU listed in the District budget above, is the amount which was approved in 1996/97 and subsequent District annexations. Each year, prior to the assessments being placed on the tax roll, the City will review the budget and determine the amount needed to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 5 -City of Rancho Cucamoriga 6 Fiscal Year 2010/11 P-481 maintain the improvements for the upcoming fiscal year. The actual assessment per EDU will be based on the total amount of funds needed to maintain the improvements in a satisfactory and healthy condition. The actual assessment amount may be lower than the maximum allowable assessment; however it may not exceed the maximum unless the increase is approved by the property owners in accordance with Proposition 21 B. It is the intent of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to maintain an Operating Reserve which shall not exceed the estimated costs of maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or when the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The reserve balance information for the District is as follows: Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2010 Reserve Fund Balance $92,897.36 Operating Reserve Contdbution -Fiscal Year 2010/11 (37,440.00) Ooe~P~'ng Reserve Collection -Fiscal Year 2010/11 0.00 Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2077 Reserve Fund Balance $55,457.36 Definitions of Budget Items The following definitions describe the costs and expenses included in the District Budget Personnel Services Reoular Salaries: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all full-time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Part Time Salaries: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all part time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Fringe Benefits: This item includes the benefits available to City employees: health care, vacation, sick time, and retirement fund. Operations and Maintenance Contract Services: GIS services for maintaining the street lights and traffic signals database. This is a combination of field and office work and is split evenly between all of the City's Street Light Maintenance Districts. Membership Dues: ISMA Certification. The cost is split evenly between all of the City's Street Light and Maintenance Districts. Utilities -Electric: This item includes the costs to furnish electricity required for the operation and maintenance of the street lights and traffic signals. Assessment Administration: This item includes the cost to all particular departments and staff of the City, and consultants for providing the administration, coordination and management of District services, operations, and incidental expenses related to the District. This item also includes creation of an annual engineer's report, resolutions and placing the assessment amounts onto the County tax roll each year, along with responding to any public inquiries and future Proposition 218 balloting . proceedings. General Overhead: This item includes the costs of all departments and staff of the City for providing the coordination of District services, inspections, annual bid management, responding to public concerns, public education, accounting, auditing and procedural matters associated with the District. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 5 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2010/11 P-482 This item also includes an allocation for general City staff time for administrative functions and systems that provide for a functional and operational assessment district within the City's administrative structure. Intertund Allocation: This item is for night time field verification of street lights working and daytime matching of pole numbers against invoices received to ensure accurate billing. The budget is divided evenly between all of the City's Street Light Maintenance Districts. Capital Expenditures: Capital Projects: This item includes new improvements to further enhance the level and quality of service provided within the boundaries of the District. This may include new or replacement street lights or traffc signals and appurtenant facilities. Operating Reserve Collection: Ooeratino Reserve Collection: This item includes the amount to be collected to maintain reserves to enable the City to pay for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or whenever the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The Reserve Fund contribution will continue until such a time the Reserve Fund balance is approximately one half of the annual costs. The fund may be allowed to accumulate in anticipation of any unforeseen expenses not included in the yearly maintenance costs. This may include, but is not limited to, street light or traffic signal replacements, repair of damaged improvements due to vandalism, storms and other similar events. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 5 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2010111 P-483 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT General Pursuant to the 1972 Act and Article XIII D, alt parcels that have a special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements and services shall be identified, and the proportionate special benefit derived by each ident~ed parcel shall be determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of improvements. The 1972 Act, permits the establishment of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include the public lighting facilities, including traffic signals.. Section 22573 of the 1972 Act requires that maintenance assessments must be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. This Section states: 'The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots orparcels in proportion to the estimated benefit fo be received by each such lof or parcel from the improvements. The determination of whether or not a lot or parcel will benefit from the improvements shall be made pursuant to the Improvement Act of 1911 (Division 7 (commencing with Section 5000) (of the Streets and Highways Code, State of CaliforniaJ." The 1972 Act also permits the designation of zones of benefit within any individual assessment district if "by reasons or variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive different degrees of benefit from the improvement" (Sec. 22574). Article XIII D, Section 4(a) of the California Constitution limits the amount of any assessment to the proportional special benefit conferred on the property. Article XIII D also provides that publicly owned properties must be assessed unless there is clear and convincing evidence that those properties receive no special benefitt from the assessment. Exempted from the assessment would be the areas of public streets, public avenues, public lanes, public roads, public drives, public courts, public alleys, public easements and rights-of-ways, public greenbelts and public parkways. The net amount to be assessed may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels. Proposition 216, approved by the voters in November 1996, requires the City to separate general benefit from special benefit, where only special benefit is assessed. Special Benefit The maintenance and servicing of the improvements within the District (which are described in the Description of Improvements and Services Section of this report) are for the benefit of the properties within the District, and as such confer a special and direct benefit to parcels within the District by: improving the livability, safety, appearance, and desirability for properties within the boundaries of the District, and ensuring that improvements do not reach a state of deterioration or disrepair so as to be materially detrimental to properties within the District, and Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 5 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 9 Fiscal Year 2010111 P-484 providing for safe vehicular and pedesUian access for properties within the District, and providing beautification, shade and overall enhancement to properties within the District. The above mentioned items affect the assessed property in a way that is particular and distinct from their effect on other parcels and that real property in general and the public at large do not share. They contribute to a specific enhancement of the properties within the District. Since these improvements were installed and are maintained specifically for the properties within the District; only properties within the District receive a special benefit and are assessed for said maintenance. General Benefit In addition to the special benefits received by parcels within the District, there are derivative general benefits that are conferred on parcels outside the boundaries of the District which include: • the safety and visual enhancement of the area to persons or vehicles that may travel through the District. However it has been determined that these benefits are derivative and do not provide a direct benefit to parcels outside of the district that are not being assessed. Method of Assessment Spread Each of the parcels wthin the District is deemed to receive special benefit from the improvements. Each parcel that has a special benefit conferred upon it as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements are identified and [he proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel is determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of the improvements. When the District was formed in 1986, Article XIII D ar~d Proposition 218 had not yet been passed. Upon the passage of Article XIII D and the subsequent passage of the Proposition Omnibus Implementation Act, new rules were put into place. Due to the changes in legal requirements, as property annexed to the District after the passage of the Assessment Law, the description of the method of assessment became more refined, however, the assessment per parcel has remained the same since the 1996/97 Fiscal Year. Further, no parcel included in the District formation or annexations prior to when the language was refined, are now being levied differently than they were at the time the District was formed or the parcels were annexed. To assess special benefit appropriately, it is necessary to relate the different type of parcel improvements to each other. The Equivalent Dwelling Unit ("EDU") method of apportionment uses the single family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single family home equals one Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU). Every other land-use is converted to EDUs based on an assessment formula that equates to the property's specific development status, type of development (land-use), and size of the property, as compared to a single family home. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land-use types, as assigned by County use code, to determine each parcel's EDU assignment. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 5-City of Rancho Cucamonga 10 Fiscal Year 2010/11 P-485 Land-Use E uivalent Dwellin units Pro e T e Coun Use Code EDU Value Multi tier Single Family Residential 1.00 Parcel The use of the latest County Assessor's Secured Roll shall be the basis for the Property Type ~ determination and units/acreage assignments, unless better data is.available to the City. In addition, if any parcel within the District is identified by the County Auditor/Controller to be an invalid parcel number for the current fiscal year, the Property Type and EDU assignment shall be based on the correct parcel number and/or new parcel number(s) County use code and subsequent property information. If a single parcel has changed to multiple parcels, the EDU assignment and assessment amount applied to each of the new parcels will be recalculated rather than spread the proportionate share of the original assessment. The following table summarizes the Fiscal Year 2010/11 maximum allowable assessment rates for the District: Maximum Allowable Property Type Assessment Rate ?dual Assessment Total Total (County Use Code) er EDU Rate per EDU Units/Acres EDUs Single Family Residential 534.60 534.60 1,273 1,273 The total amount of maintenance and incidental costs for maintaining the streetlights and traffic signals is assessed to the individual parcels of real property within the District in proportion to the special beneft received by such parcels of real property. The proposed individual assessments are shown on the assessment roll in this report. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 5 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 11 Fiscal Year 2010/11 P-486 ~ ~ ~ ~~ V + + E y . J ~ ~ Q o f = U o G1 ~ -... . .._..__ _._.. _.._...._....... _.._...._. ny ways ~ ~ ~ y 1 1 .._.._.._, i ~ .. J ~ //~~ €~Y ~ i ' I , N c N ____..___ ~.r j ~ C i ~ m ~ ~ 3 o i ~ i € ~ ~ ! ny epuen~g~l i i _ a ,~ I ...., ~ i € J ! ,~.; ~ ~9 ~aa~~ ;(ep~ i ,_.._. _.._.._......_.. ~ ny~alsayooa i .....,. .. _.. i ~ ~_. ,__.. __.._._ ! ny ~alsayooa ~ _ ~" i ,~ ` i 1 ,. i ny ua~!II!W f._.._.._.._.._.. _ ... -- _. _ _ _._ . ~ any ua~!II!W i ~ ! € ,, ' ~ o ..... ... , ny uaneH ! ! ~ i .,, ~. ,.. - - ~ _ any uaneH ° ny esow~aH j _ i.. .,' j. ~' _.,. ; I .... ;iny esow~aH ! ~ i i , a ny Pleq!4o~ ~ __.. , . 'I . :. . ~ _.. , . ~ _- p ny ple9!4o~y ! - € ny uewllaH € i i ~I o ~~. N ny uewllaH € ~ P' ~ t ~e%au ~ n € y p ~ ! t u x t: c€ g 1 ~ g , I ~-;' ~'S' 3 ~ k 3§4 £~€ ~~~q~` ;e v .N c N m s e y E€~~Y~•F 3 d € p§ 2 ~ 6 ez[ ~ ~ g€c ~s=e ' °~ *~~~dEafS~~ ~~ a f ~uVe~rb$~~~ [ g U Fadanid Fal e3 P-487 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM An Assessment Diagram for the District is shown on the following page. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the County Assessor of the County San Bernardino, at the time this report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Engineer's Report. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 5 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 12 Fiscal Year 2010/11 P-488 ASSESSMENT ROLL Assessment Roll The assessment roll is a listing of the assessment for Fiscal Year 2010/11 apportioned to each lot or parcel, as shown on the last equalized roll of the Assessor of the County of San Bernardino. The following tables summarize the Fiscal Year 2010111 maximum and actual assessments for the District: Maximum Allowable Maximum Property Type Assessment Rate Total Total Allowable Coun Use Code er EDU UnitslAcres EDUs Assessment Single Family Residential $34.60 1,273 1,273 $44,045.60 Actual Property Type Assessment Rate Total Total Actual Coun Use Code er EDU Units/Acres EDUs Assessment Single Family Residential $34.60 1,273 1,273 $44,045.80 A copy of the full assessment roll is available for review in the City Clerk's office. Annexations There were no annexations effective for the 2010/11 Fiscal Year. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 5 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 13 Fiscal Year 2010/11 P-489 Revised Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2010/2011 City of Rancho Cucamonga Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 (Commercial/Industrial) P-490 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 6 (COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL) 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Phone: 909.477.2740 Fax: 909.477.2741 cITY couNCIL Donald J. Kurth, Mayor L. Dennis Michael, Mayor Pro Tem Rex Gutierrez, Council Member Sam Spagnolo, Council Member Diane Williams, Council Member CITY STAFF John R. Gillison, Assistant City Manager Linda D. Daniels, Deputy City Manager William Wittkopf, Public Works Director Jeff Bames, Park and Landscape Superintendent Ingrid Y. Bruce, GIS/Special Districts Manager Christopher Bopko, Management Analyst III P-491 TABLE OF CONTENTS ENGINEER'S LETTER INTRODUCTION 1 3 Reason for Assessment .............................................................................................3 Process for Annual Assessment .................................................................................3 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS 5 Description of the Boundaries of the District ...............................................................5 Description of Improvements and Services ................................................................5 Map of Improvements .................................................................................................5 ESTIMATE OF COSTS 6 District Budget ............................................................................................................6 Definitions of Budget Items .........................................................................................7 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT 9 General .......................................................................................................................9 Special Benefit ...........................................................................................................9 General Benefit ........................................................................................................10 Method of Assessment Spread ................................................................................10 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM ASSESSMENT ROLL 12 73 Assessment Roll .......................................................................................................13 Annexations .................................................................. . ...........................................13 P-492 ENGINEER'S LETTER WHEREAS, on ,the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga (the "City"), under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 (the "1972 AcY) adopted its Resolution No. _, a Resolution Initiating Proceedings for the Levy of Annual Assessments for Street Light Maintenance District No. 6 (CommerciaUlndustrial) (the "District"); and WHEREAS, the Resolution Initiating Proceedings directed NBS to prepare and file an Engineer's Report for Fiscal Year 2010!11 pursuant to the requirements of the 1972 Act. The Engineer's Report presents the plans and specifications describing the general nature, location and extent of the improvements to be maintained, an estimate of the costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements for the District for the referenced fiscal year, a diagram for the District, showing the area and properties proposed to be assessed, and an assessment of the estimated costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing the improvements, assessing the net amount upon all assessable lots and/or parcels within the District in proportion to the special benefit received; and NOW THEREFORE, the following assessment is proposed to be authorized in order to pay the estimated costs of maintenance, operation and servicing of the improvements to be paid by the assessable real property within the boundaries of the District in proportion to the special benefit received. The following table summarizes the proposed assessment. SUMMARY OF ASSESSMENT Fiscal Year 2010111 Total Estimated Assessment $127,457.61 Plus Anticipated Delinquency Penalty 727,61 Total Estimated Revenue $126,730.00 Plus Reserve Fund Contribution 26 690.00 Total Expenditure Budget $153,420.00 Total District EDU Count 2,479.72 Actual Assessment per EDU $51.40 Maximum Allowable Assessment per EDU $51.40 In making the assessments contained herein pursuant to the 1972 Act: I have identified all parcels which will have a special benefit conferred upon them from the improvements described in the Special Benefit Section of this Engineer's Report (the "Specially Benefited Parcels"). For particulars as to the identification of said parcels, reference is made to the Assessment Diagram, a copy of which is included in this Engineer's Report. I have evaluated the costs and expenses of the improvements upon the Specially Benefited Parcels. In making such evaluation: Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2010/11 P-493 a. The proportionate special benefit derived by each Specially Benefited Parcel from the improvements was determined in relationship to the entirety of the maintenance costs of the improvements; b. No assessment has been imposed on any Specially Benefited Parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferced on such parcel from the improvements; and c. Any general benefits from the improvements have been separated from the special benefits and only special benefits have been assessed. I, the undersigned, respectfully submit the enclosed Engineer's Report and, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, the Engineer's Report, Assessments, and the Assessment Diagram herein have been prepared and computed in accordance with the order of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Assessment Law. Mark A. Steuer, City Engineer Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2010/11 P-494 INTRODUCTION Reason for Assessment Approval of the assessment covered by this Engineers Report will generate the revenue necessary to: Provide for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements described in this Engineer's Report. Maintenance may include but is not limited to, all of the following: the repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement. Servicing means the furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operating and servicing of any improvement. Servicing shall also include vehicle, equipment, capital improvements and administrative costs associated with the annual administration and operation of the District. Process for Annual Assessment The City cannot levy and collect annual assessments within the District without complying with the procedures specified in the 1972 Act. On an annual basis, an Engineer's Report must be prepared which contains a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the district. The City Council must also adopt a resolution of intention which: • Declares the intention of the City Council to levy and collect assessments within the assessment district for the fiscal year stated therein. • Generally describes the existing and proposed improvements and any substantial changes proposed to be made in existing improvements. Refers to the assessment district by its distinctive designation and indicate the general location of the district. • Refers to the report of the engineer, on file with the clerk, for a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the district. • Gives notice of the time and place for public hearing by the City Council on the levy of the proposed assessment. States whether the assessment is proposed to increase from the previous year. If the assessments are to be levied in the same or lesser amounts than the maximum assessment amount approved, the clerk shall give notice by causing the resolution of intention to be published. Any interested person may, prior to the conclusion of the public hearing, file a written protest which shall state all grounds of objection. The protest shall contain a description sufficient to identify the property owned by the property owner filing the protest. During the course or upon conclusion of the hearing, the City Council may order changes in any of the matters provided in the report, including changes in the improvements, any zones within the assessment district, and the proposed diagram or the proposed assessment. The City Council, upon conclusion of the public hearing must then adopt a resolution confirming the diagram and assessment, either as originally proposed or as changed by it. The adoption of the resolution shall constitute the levy of an assessment for the fiscal year referred to in the assessment. If the assessment to be levied exceeds the maximum assessment amount previously approved, the City must comply with the procedures specified in Article XIII D and Proposition 218. The voters in the State of California in November 1996 added Article XIII D to the Califomia Constitution imposing, Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 - Cfty of Rancho Cucamonga 3 Fiscal Year 2010/11 P-495 among other requirements, the necessity for the City to conduct an assessment ballot procedure to enable the owners of each property on which assessments are proposed to be enacted or increased, the opportunity to express their support for, or opposition to the proposed assessment or increase in such assessment. The basic steps of the assessment ballot procedure are outlined below. The City must prepare a Notice of Public Hearing ("Notice"), which describes, along with other mandated information, the reason for the proposed assessments, and to provide a date and time of a public hearing to be held on the matter. The City must also prepare an assessment ballot, which clearly gives the property owner the ability to sign and mark their assessment ballot either in favor of, or in opposition to the proposed assessment. The Notice and assessment ballot are mailed to each affected property owner within the District a minimum of 45 days prior to the public hearing date as shown in the Notice. The City may also hold community meetings with the property owners to discuss the issues facing the District and to answer property owner questions directly. After the Notice and assessment ballot are mailed, property owners are given until the close of the public hearing, stated in the Notice, to return their signed and marked assessment ballot. During the public hearing, property owners are given the opportunity to address the City Council and ask questions or voice their concerns. At the public hearing, the returned assessment ballots received prior to the close of the public hearing are tabulated, weighted by the proposed assessment amount on each property and the results are announced by the City Council. Article XIII D provides that if, as a result of the assessment ballot proceeding, a majority protest is found to exist, the City Council shall not have the authority to levy and collect the assessments as proposed. A majority protest exists if the assessments represented by ballots submitted in opposition exceed those submitted in favor of the assessment. All returned ballots are tabulated and weighted according to the financial obligation of each particular parcel. If there is no majority protest as described above, the City Council may approve the proposed assessments. If there is a majority protest, as described above, the City will not levy and collect any assessments. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2010/11 P-496 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS The District provides for the administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing of various improvements located within the public right-of-way and dedicated easements within the boundaries of the District. Description of the Boundaries of the District The District is located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California. The boundaries of the District. are generally described as the commercial and industrial area of the City which is generally bounded by Foothill Boulevard on the north, 4`" Street on the South, East Avenue on the east and Grove Avenue on the west. Reference is also made to the Assessment Diagram included in this Report. Description of Improvements and Services The improvements are the maintenance and servicing of street lights, traffic signals and appurtenant facilities throughout the District. The maintenance and servicing includes, but is not limited to, furnishing electric current for public lighting facilities including street lights and traffic signals, and associated appurtenant facilities. Services include personnel, materials, contracting services, utilities, and all necessary costs associated with the maintenance, replacement and repair required to keep the improvements in operational and satisfactory condition. In addition, it is the City's intention to continue to use cost effective materials, in order to lower expenses of the District. Map of Improvements The following page shows the map of street light and traffic signal improvements to be maintained using District funds. Street Lighting Maintenance District Mo. B -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2010111 ® ~ ~ z ~ c o ~ m ~ 'a U ,y O C to U U d ~ 1 N ~._ _.._ _ J E _ i E 8 E i ~ Q~ 1 p .~ ~ 4 Z /le ntl •DUe•~D]~ ~ ~ -- ~-^-~~y tlepueMy3 ~ > ' .L O i •/e+ ~ ~ ~ •.vy N ~ ~ W i...._..._.e_.. ~.._ _ - _ '-. Q~ ~ .v o~. .m I siy V C ~ ~ f .,..~ e in t"• .a: v i. wAm _ ~ r. _.._.._~acwvi. ~~. ~ ~ j ~^' 1 -.. r }r~~ N~ • I _.. I nruuew V/ FI - y T I ~~ J ._ .e,W,•w nr e.ew~ ~ ++ ~ J - w r ~ •rD ~ rerew•r N L ~~E ~ V/ .r u.un.H~ J ~ {{ \ a ~d +r o+.~•w ~'e rc wwn' i _ _ _ ~ c5 Y~~ {{ ~~i et FY~Yi~~ 6~E ~ 4s •tl em•O p H E 6 g v~ 3. E F s ~ a e ~g~~s~S'~dBF~~~ 'a ~. ~ ~ ~~~~ a ctt~o] '~ g# $~~ Ye ~~ sg&~$~ yyEEE a F~E Zfe~ ~~ id •~ ~~ ~zt~ ~a~s4ife€ ~~~~~~ P-498 ESTIMATE OF COSTS The estimated costs of administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing the improvements as described in the Plans and Specifications are summarized below. Each year, as part of the assessment district levy calculation process, the costs and expenses are reviewed and the annual costs are projected for the following fiscal year. District Budget Estimated 2010111 Bud et Personnel Services Regular Payroll $21,660.00 Part-time Salaries 0.00 Frinae Benefits 10.180.00 Subtotal Personnel $31,840.00 Operations and Maintenance Training $180.00 Membership Dues 30.00 Operations and Maintenance 6,940.00 Equipment Operations and Maintenance 400.00 Contrail Services 14,670.00 Utilities Telephone Utilities 0.00 Electric Utilities 64,800.00 Assessment Administration 5,480.00 General Overhead 9,080.00 Interfund Allocation 0-~ Subtotal Operations and Maintenance $121,580.00 Capital Expenditures Capital Projects $0.00 Subtotal Capital Expenditures $0.00 Total District Expenditure Budget $153,420.00 Total Estimated Assessment $127,457.61 Less Anticipated Delinquencies 72{ 7.61) Total Estimated Revenue $126,730.00 Pius Operating Reserve Fund Contribution 26.690.00 Total Expenditure Budget $153,420.00 Total Estimated Assessment $127,457.61 Total District EDU Count 2,479.72 Actual Assessment per EDU -Fiscal Year 2010/11 $51.40 Maximum Allowable Assessment er EDU -Fiscal Year 2010/11 $51.40 The maximum allowable assessment per EDU listed in the District budget above, is the amount which was approved in 1996/97 and subsequent District annexations. Each year, prior to the assessments being placed on the tax roll, [he City will review the budget and determine the amount needed to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 6 Fiscal Year 2010111 P-499 maintain the improvements for the upcoming fiscal year. The actual assessment per EDU will be based on the total amount of funds needed to maintain the improvements in a satisfactory and healthy condition. The actual assessment amount may be lower than the maximum allowable assessment; however it may not exceed the maximum unless the increase is approved by the property owners in accordance with Proposition 218. It is the intent of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to maintain an Operating Reserve which shall not exceed the estimated costs of maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or when the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The reserve balance information for the District is as follows: Estimated Fiscal Year Entling June 30, 2010 Reserve Fund Balance $365,526.56 Operating Reserve Contribution -Fiscal Year 2010/11 (26,690.00) Operating Reserve Collection -Fiscal Year 2010/11 0.00 Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2011 Reserve Fund Balance $329,836.56 Definitions of Budget Items The following definitions describe the costs and expenses included in the District Budget Personnel Services Regular Salaries: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all full-time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Part Time Salaries: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all part time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Fringe Benefits: This item includes the benefits available to City employees: health care, vacation, sick time, and retirement fund. Operations and Maintenance Contract Services: GIS services for maintaining the street lights and traffic signals database. This is a combination of feld and office work and is split evenly between all of the City's Street Light iJ~aintenance Districts. Membershia Dues: ISMA Certification. The cost is split evenly between all of the City's Street Light and Maintenance Districts. Utilities -Electric: This item includes the costs to furnish electricity required for the operation and maintenance of the street lights and traffic signals. Assessment Administration: This item includes the cost to all particular departments and staff of the City, and consultants for providing the administration, coordination and management of District services, operations, and incidental expenses related to the District. This item also includes creation of an annual engineer's report, resolutions and placing the assessment amounts onto the County tax roll each year, along with responding to any public inquiries and future Proposition 218 balloting proceedings. General Overhead: This item includes the costs of all departments and staff of the City for providing the coordination of District services, inspections, annual bid management, responding to public concerns, public education, accounting, auditing and procedural matters associated with the District. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2010/11 P-500 This item also includes an allocation for general City staff time for administrative functions and systems that provide for a functional and operational assessment district within the City's administrative structure. Interfund Allocation: This item is for night time field verification of street lights working and daytime matching of pole numbers against invoices received to ensure accurate billing. The budget is divided evenly between all of the City's Street Light Maintenance Districts. Capital Expenditures: Capital Projects: This item includes new improvements to further enhance the level and quality of service provided within the boundaries of the District. This may include new or replacement street lights or traffic signals and appurtenant facilities. Operating Reserve Collection: Ooeratinc Reserve Collection: This item includes the amount to be collected to maintain reserves to enable the City to pay for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or whenever the City expects to receive.its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The Reserve Fund contribution will continue until such a time the Reserve Fund balance is approximately one half of the annual costs. The fund ...ay be allowed to accumulate in anticipation of any unforeseen expenses not included in the yearly maintenance costs. This may include, but is not limited to, street light or traffic signal replacements, repair of damaged improvements due to vandalism, storms and other similar events. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2010/11 P-501 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT General Pursuant to the 1972 Act and Article XIII D, all parcels that have a special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements and services shall be identifed, and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel shall be determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of improvements. The 1972 Act, permits the establishment of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include the public lighting facilities, including traffic signals.. Section 22573 of the 1972 Act requires that maintenance assessments must be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. This Section states: "The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district maybe apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefrt to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements. The determination of whether or rct a lot or paroel will benefit from the improvements shall be made pursuant to the Improvement Act of 1911 (Division 7 (commencing with Section 5000) (of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California)." The 1972 Act also permits the designation of zones of benefit within any individual assessment district if "by reasons or variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive different degrees of benefit from the improvement" (Sec. 22574). Article XIII D, Section 4(a) of the California Constitution limits the amount of any assessment to the proportional special benefit conferred on the property. Article XIII D also provides that publicly owned properties must be assessed unless there is clear and convincing evidence that those properties receive no special benefit from the assessment. Exempted from the assessment would be the areas of public streets, public avenues, public lanes, public roads, public drives, public courts, public alleys, public easements and rights-of-ways, public greenbelts and public parkvrays. The net amount to be assessed may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels. Proposition 21 S, approved by the voters in November 1996, requires the City to separate general benefit from special benefit, where only special benefit is assessed. Benefit The maintenance and servicing of the improvements within the District (which are described in the Description of Improvements and Services Section of this report) are for the benefit of the properties within the District, and as such confer a special and direct benefit to parcels within the District by: improving the livability, safety, appearance, and desirability for properties within the boundaries of the District, and ensuring that improvements do not reach a state of deterioration or disrepair so as to be materially detrimental to properties within the District, and Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2010111 P-502 providing for safe vehicular and pedestrian access for properties within the District, and providing beautification, shade and overall enhancement to properties within the District. The above mentioned items affect the assessed property in a way that is particular and distinct from their effect on other parcels and that real property in general and the public at large do not share. They contribute to a specific enhancement of the properties within the District. Since these improvements were installed and are maintained specifically for the properties within the District; only properties within the District receive a special benefit and are assessed for said maintenance. General Benefit In addition to the special benefits received by parcels within the District, there are derivative general benefits that are conferred on parcels outside the boundaries of the District which include: • the safety and visual enhancement of the area to persons or vehicles that may travel through the District. However it has been determined that these benefits are derivative and do not provide a direct benefit to parcels outside of the district that are not being assessed. Method of Assessment Spread Each of the parcels within the District is deemed to receive special benefit from the improvements. Each parcel that has a special benefit conferred upon it as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements are identifed and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel is determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of the improvements. When the District was formed in 1987, Article XIII D and Proposition 218 had not yet been passed. Upon the passage of Article XIII D and the subsequent passage of the Proposition Omnibus Implementation Act, new rules were put into place. Due to the changes in legal requirements, as property annexed to the District after the passage of the Assessment Law, the description of the method of assessment became more refined, however, the assessment per parcel has remained the same since the 1996/97 Fiscal Year. Further, no parcel included in the District formation or annexations prior to when the language was refined, are now being levied differently than they were at the time the District was formed or the parcels were annexed. To assess special benefit appropriately, it is necessary to relate the different type of parcel improvements to each other. The Equivalent Dwelling Unit ("EDU") method of apportionment uses the single family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single family home equals one Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU). Every other land-use is converted to EDUs based on an assessment formula that equates to the property's specific development status, type of development (land-use), and size of the property, as compared to a single family home. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land-use types, as assigned by County use code, to determine each parcel's EDU assignment. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 10 Fiscal Year 2010/11 P-503 Land-Use Equivalent Dwelling Units Pro e T e Coun Use Code EDU Value Multiplier Non Residential 1.00 Acre Vacant 1.00 Acre The use of the latest County Assessor's Secured Roll shall be the basis for the Property Type determination and unitslacreage assignments, unless better data is available to the City. In addition, if any parcel within the District is identified by the County AuditorlController to be an invalid parcel number for the current fiscal year, the Property Type and EDU assignment shall be based on the correct parcel number and/or new parcel number(s) County use code and subsequent property information. If a single parcel has changed to multiple parcels, the EDU assignment and assessment amount applied to each of the new parcels will be recalculated rather than spread the proportionate share of the original assessment. The following table summarizes the Fiscal Year 2010/11 maximum allowable assessment rates for th=_ District: Property Type Maximum Allowable Actual (County Use Code) Assessment Rate Assessment Rate Total Total er EDU er EDU Units/Acres EDUs Non Residential $51.40 $51.40 2,479.72 2,479.72 Vacant ~ 51.40 51.40 0 0 The total amount of maintenance and incidental costs for maintaining the streetlights and traffic signals is assessed to the individual parcels of real property within the District in proportion to the special benefit received by such parcels of real property. The proposed individual assessments are shown on the assessment roll in this report. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 11 Fiscal Year 2010!11 P-504 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM An Assessment Diagram for the District is shown on the following page. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the County Assessor of the County San Bernardino, at the time this report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Engineer's Report. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 12 Fiscal Year 2010/11 V 'i .y O V A~ W Yr C ._ .~ J r.+ i ny ua~!II!W ny uaneH ny esow~aH nH PIe9!yo~t/ ny uewilaH ~ 1S ue!lawe~ o~ 1 r-5u5 ~~ !D ~ s 3 o ~ lL Q .~ J (p _ (U ~ ~ ^~ ~ ~r ® ~' 0 0 N O nb'lse3 in s v ny epueMg3 ny ~a1sayoob ~ ny ua~lll!W ~® ny anal m ~ ~ :~ O o~ o Q s!~ ja[ e ' 3 8~Y P-506 ASSESSMENT ROLL Assessment Roll The assessment roll is a listing of the assessment for Fiscal Year 2010/11 apportioned to each Ict or parcel, as shown on the last equalized roll of the Assessor of the County of San Bernardino. The following tables summarize the Fiscal Year 2010/11 maximum and actual assessments for the District: Property Type Coun Use Code Maximum Allowable Assessment Rate er EDU Total Units/Acres Total EDUs Maximum Allowable Assessment Non Residential $51.40 2,479.72 2,479.72 $127,457.61 Vacant 51.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 TOTALS 2,479.72 2,479.72 $127,457.61 Property Type Coun Use Code Actual Assessment Rate er EDU Total Units/Acres Total EDUs Actual Assessment Non Residential $51.40 2,479.72 2,479.72 $127,457.61 Vacant 51.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 TOTALS 2,479.72 2,479.72 127,457.61 A copy of the full assessment roll is available for review in the City Clerk's office. Annexations The following annexations are effective for the 2010/11 Fiscal Year: Assessor's Parcel Annexation Total Total Property Type Number Date Project Units/Acres EDUs Coun Use Code 0229-141-14 4/152009 DRC2005-00703 4.81 4.81 Non Residential 0208-101-22, 0208-101-23, 7/1/2009 DRC2008-00567 9.21 9.21 Non Residential 0208-101-24, 0208-101-25 0207-132-53 8/192009 DRC2005-00327 1.52 1.52 Non Residential Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 13 Fiscal Year 2010/11 P-507 Revised Annual Engineers Report Fiscal Year 2010/2011 City of Rancho Cucamonga Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 7 (North Etiwanda} P-508 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DfSTRICT NO. 7 (NORTH ETIWANDA) 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Phone: 909.477.2740 Fax: 909.477.2741 CITY COUNCIL Donald J. Kurth, Mayor L. Dennis Michael, Mayor Pro Tem Rex Gutierrez, Council Member Sam Spagnolo, Council Member Diane Williams, Ccuncil IJlember CITY STAFF John R. Gillison, Assistant City Manager Linda D. Daniels, Deputy City Manager William Wittkopf, Public Works Director Jeff Barnes, Park and Landscape Superintendent Ingrid Y. Bruce, GIS/Special Districts Manager Christopher Bopko, Management Analyst III P-509 TABLE OF CONTENTS ENGINEER'S LETTER INTRODUCTION 1 3 Reason for Assessment .............................................................................................3 Process for Annual Assessment .................................................................................3 PLANS AND SPEC/F/CATIONS 5 Description of the Boundaries of the District ...............................................................5 Description of Improvements and Services ................................................................5 Map of Improvements .................................................................................................5 ESTIMATE OF COSTS 6 District Budget ............................................................................................................6 Definitions of Budget Items .........................................................................................7 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT 9 General .......................................................................................................................9 Special Benefit ...........................................................................................................9 General Benefit ........................................................................................................10 Method of Assessment Spread ................................................................................10 ASSESSMENT D/AGRAM ASSESSMENT ROLL 12 13 Assessment Roll .......................................................................................................13 Annexations ..............................................................................................................13 P-510 ENGINEER'S LETTER WHEREAS, on ,the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga (the "City"), under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 (the "1972 Act") adopted its Resolution No. _, a Resolution Initiating Proceedings for the Levy of Annual Assessments for Street Light Maintenance District No. 7 (North Etiwanda) (the "District"); and WHEREAS, the Resolution Initiating Proceedings directed NBS to prepare and file an Engineer's Report for Fiscal Year 2010/11 pursuant to the requirements of the 1972 Act. The Engineer's Report presents the plans and specifications describing the general nature, location and extent of the improvements to be maintained, an estimate of the costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements for the District for the referenced fiscal year, a diagram for the District, showing 'the area and properties proposed to be assessed, and an assessment of the estimated costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing the improvements, assessing the net amount upon all assessable lots and/or parcels within the District in proportion to the special benefit received; and NOW THEREFORE, the following assessment is proposed to be authorized in order to pay the estimated costs of maintenance, operation and servicing of the improvements to be paid by the assessable real property within the boundaries of the DisUict in proportion to the special benefit received. The following table summarizes the proposed assessment. SUMMARY OF ASSESSMENT Fiscal Year 2010!11 Total Estimated Assessment $103,991.72 Plus Anticipated Delinquency Penalty 1 901.72 Total Estimated Revenue §102,090.00 Plus Reserve Fund Contribution 159 670.00 Total Expenditure Budget $261,760.00 Total District EDU Count 3,121.00 Actual Assessment r EDU §33.32 Maximum Allowable Assessment per EDU $33.32 In making the assessments contained herein pursuant to the 1972 Act: I have identified all parcels which will have a special benefit conferred upon them from the improvements described in the Special Benefit Section of this Engineer's Report (the "Specially Benefited Parcels"). For particulars as to the identification of said parcels, reference is made to the Assessment Diagram, a copy of which is included in this Engineer's Report. I have evaluated the costs and expenses of the improvements upon the Specially Benefited Parcels. In making such evaluation: Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 7 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2010/11 P-511 a. The proportionate special benefit derived by each Specially Benefited Parcel from the improvements was determined in relationship to the entirety of the maintenance costs of the improvements; b. No assessment has been imposed on any Specially Benefited Parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on such parcel from the improvements; and c. Any general benefits from the improvements have been separated from the special benefits and only special benefts have been assessed. I, the undersigned, respectfully submit the enclosed Engineer's Report and, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, the Engineer's Report, Assessments, and the Assessment Diagram herein have been prepared and computed in accordance with the order of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Assessment Law, Mark, A. Steuer, City Engineer Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 7-City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2010/11 P-512 INTRODUCTION Reason for Assessment Approval of the assessment covered by this Engineer's Report will generate the revenue necessary to: Provide for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements described in this Engineer's Report. Maintenance may include but is not limited to, all of the following: the repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement. Servicing means the furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operating and servicing of any improvement. Servicing shall also include vehicle, equipment, capital improvements and administrative costs associated with the annual administration and operation of the District. Process for Annual Assessment The City cannot levy and collect annual assessments within the District without complying with the procedures specified in the 1972 Act. Qn an annua! basis, an Engineer's Report must be prepared which contains a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the district. The City Council must also adopt a resolution of intention which: Declares the intention of-the City Council to levy and collect assessments within the assessment district for the fiscal year stated therein. • Generally describes the existing and proposed improvements and any substantial changes proposed to be made in existing improvements. • Refers to the assessment district by its distinctive designation and indicate the general location of the district. Refers to the report of the engineer, on file with the clerk, for a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the district. Gives notice of the time and place for public hearing by the City Council on the levy of the proposed assessment. • States whether the assessment is proposed to increase from the previous year. If the assessments are to be levied in the same or lesser amounts than the maximum assessment amount approved, the clerk shall give notice by causing the resolution of intention to be published. Any interested person may, prior to the conclusion of the public hearing, file a written protest which shall state all grounds of objection. The protest shall contain a description sufficient to identify the property owned by the property owner filing the protest. During the course or upon conclusion of the hearing, the City Council may order changes in any of the matters provided in the report, including changes in the improvements, any zones within the assessment district, and the proposed diagram or the proposed assessment. The City Council, upon conclusion of the public hearing must then adopt a resolution confirming the diagram and assessment, either as originally proposed or as changed by it. The adoption of the. resolution shall constitute the levy of an assessment far the fiscal year referred to in the assessment. If the assessment to be levied exceeds the maximum assessment amount previously approved, the City must comply with the procedures specified in Article XIII D and Proposition 218. The voters in the State of Calffomia in November 1998 added Article XIII D to the California Constitution imposing, Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 7 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 3 Fiscal Year 2010/11 P-513 among other requirements, the necessity for the City to conduct an assessment ballot procedure to enable the owners of each property on which assessments are proposed to lie enacted or increased, the opportunity to express their support for, or opposition to the proposed assessment or increase in such assessment. The basic steps of the assessment ballot procedure are outlined below. The City must prepare a Notice of Public Hearing ("Notice"), which describes, along with other mandated information, the reason for the proposed assessments, and to provide a date and time of a public hearing to be held on the matter. The City must also prepare an assessment ballot, which clearly gives the property owner the ability to sign and mark their assessment ballot either in favor of, or in opposition to the proposed assessment. The Notice and assessment ballot are mailed to each affected property owner within the District a minimum of 45 days prior to the public hearing date as shown in the Notice. The City may also hold community meetings with the property owners to discuss the issues facing the District and to answer property owner questions directly. After the Notice and assessment ballot are mailed, property owners are given until the close of the public hearing, stated in the Notice, to return their signed and marked assessment ballot. During the public hearing, property owners are given the opportunity to address the City Council and ask questions or voice their concerns. At the public hearing, the returned assessment ballots received prior to the close of the public hearing are tabulated, weighted by the proposed assessment amount on each property and the results are announced by the City Council. Article XIII D provides that if, as a result of the assessment ballot proceeding, a majority protest is found to exist, the City Council shall not have the authority to levy and collect the assessments as proposed. A majority protest exists if the assessments represented by ballots submitted in opposition exceed those submitted in favor of the assessment. All returned ballots are tabulated and weighted according to the financial obligation of each particular parcel. If there is no majority protest as described above, the City Council may approve the proposed assessments. If [here is a majority protest, as described above, [he City will not levy and collect any assessments. Street Ligh@ng Maintenance District No. 7-City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2010/11 P-574 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS The District provides for the administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing of various improvements located within the public right-of-way and dedicated easements within the boundaries of the District. Description of the Boundaries of the District The District is located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California. The boundaries of the District are generally described as that area of the City known as North Etiwanda, which is generally bounded by Highland Avenue on the south, Day Creek Channel on the west and City limits on the east and north. Reference is also made to the Assessment Diagram included in this Report. Description of Improvements and Services The improvements are the maintenance and servicing of street lights, traffic signals and appurtenant facilities throughout the District. The maintenance and servicing includes, but is not limited to, furnishing electric current for public lighting facilities including street lights and traffic signals, and associated appurtenant facilities. Services include personnel, materials, contracting services, utilities, and all necessary costs associated with the maintenance, replacement and repair required to keep the improvements in operational and satisfactory condition. In addition, it is the City's intention to continue to use cost effective materials, in order to lower expenses of the District. Map of Improvements The following page shows the map of street light and traffic signal improvements to be maintained using District funds. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 7 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2010/11 ® ~r ~~ ~C N ~ N 1~ a tl d•® 1 5 1 1 i+ _ _ _ ... . w. ~ 0 ~ • pbS l"l • W U a ~ • LL 1 w ~6 A,, A Z W • i • .,DRE N • ~Q Z ~ ~e W ~ d 0 HOf LL Imo, V O ~ • JU, J~J ~ 6 4 I a 1 U ~ N ~ • • WOW NOO' 0 O `F ~ j 3015318 ; Il 8 Ntl O .~\ V ~ '~ .~ 1031 3N / !- ~ } i~ G I ~~ ~ n ' L j ~ ~ N N 1d of ~ ,s, • `d I ~ m F v 'a ~ . o°, ntl tla ~ ~ } ~ ~ LL ~ ~ N }~ jit . ,~ ~ v , ~ 1 ~ C U fi _ j ~ N111WW S ~ ? ~ji / W s ~ J s I d r , ~ ~ ~ ,, L AA,, ~ W ~ jF.`} ~ ~ t ~tltl 13 R LOS 3 /~ // V/ i ' i~l 0110 Z a ¢• `p0 • K r o ~,~/ ~ ~ ~ z• • ~ o 1d 00 '" 3 OI y/ ~ I I7 p ~'9 • rc S • ° ~ u 1d ~ aD 1 n b / b K ~ < a U O SOlI $Ol 1 1 y y y 0 ~ •n ~ U L0 b1 ~ ..+'3 1 1 S 3018 S 3 8b1 ~.- ~ O Y a o a I • s $ 'I~ p O J~ ~ K W U ~ ~ c 0 o ( t!E ;4t.[ iiE tteE. e i ~~ E~~ ~ i d ~ j x ~ o - vi 1 a0 Atl0 I ~' l itf ye i~t{{ii{{~~ t~~(j 1 t ~ ~(~t i o u W m ~ s pp j1i SE ~`{ i~ EF)ts It ~ f CU ~, p a _ pp t ii :1S `}F~171~F1Fi .. P-516 ESTIMATE OF COSTS The estimated costs of administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing the improvements as described in the Plans and Specifications are summarized below. Each year, as part of the assessment district levy calculation process, the costs and expenses are reviewed and the annual costs are projected for the following fiscal year. District Estimated 2010!11 Bud et Personnel Services Regular Payroll $21,660.00 Pan-time Salaries 0.00 Frinoe Benefits 10.180.00 Subtotal Personnel $31,840.00 Operations and Maintenance Training $180.00 Membership Dues 30.00 Operations and Maintenance 4,940.00 Equipment Operations and Maintenance 0.00 Contract Services 14,670.00 Utilities Telephone Utilities 0.00 Electric Utilities 169,600.00 Assessment Administration 17,180.00 General Overhead 7,030.00 Interfund Allocation 16.290.00 Subtotal Operations and Maintenance $229,920.00 Capital Expenditures Capital Protects 0.00 Subtotal Capital Expenditures $0.00 Total District Expenditure Budget $261,7fi0.00 Total Estimated Assessment $103,991.72 Less Antiapated Delinquencies 1 901.72 Total Estimated Revenue $102,090.00 Plus Operating Reserve Fund Contribution 159 670.00 Total Expenditure Budget $261,760.00 Total Estimated Assessment $103,991.72 Total District EDU Count 3,121.00 Actual Assessment per EDU -Fiscal Year 2010/11 $33.32 Maximum Allowable Assessment er EDU -Fiscal Year 2010/11 $33.32 The maximum allowable assessment per EDU listed in the District budget above, is the amount which was approved in 1996/97 and subsequent District annexations. Each year, prior to the assessments being placed on the tax roll, the City will review the budget and determine the amount needed to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 7 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2010111 P-517 maintain the improvements for the upcoming fiscal year. The actual assessment per EDU will be based on the total amount of funds needed to maintain the improvements in a satisfactory and healthy condition. The actual assessment amount may be lower than the maximum allowable assessment; however it may not exceed the maximum unless the increase is approved by the property owners in accordance with Proposition 218. It is the intent of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to maintain an Operating Reserve which shall not exceed the estimated costs of maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or when the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The reserve balance information for the District is as follows: Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2010 Reserve Fund Balance $307,422.64.64 Operating Reserve Contribution -Fiscal Year 2D10/11 (159,670.00) Operating Reserve Collection -Fiscal Year 2010/11 0.00 Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2011 Reserve Fund Balance $147,752.64 Definitions of Budget Items The following defnitions describe the costs and expenses included in the District Budget Personnel Services Regular Salaries: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all full-time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Part Time Salaries: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all part time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Fringe Benefits: This item includes the benefits available to City employees: health care, vacation, sick time, and retirement fund. Operations and Maintenance Contract Services: GIS services for maintaining the street lights and traffic signals database. This is a combination of field and office work and is split evenly between all of the City's Street Light Maintenance Districts. Membership Dues: ISMA Certification. The cost is split evenly between all of the City's Street Light and Maintenance Districts. Utilities -Electric: This item includes the costs to furnish electricity required for the operation and maintenance of the street lights and traffic signals. Assessment Administration: This item includes the cost to all particular departments and staff of the City, and consultants for providing the administration, coordination and management of District services, operations, and incidental expenses related to the District. This item also includes creation of an annual engineer's report, resolutions and placing the assessment amounts onto the County tax roll each year, along with responding to any public inquiries and future Proposition 218 balloting proceedings. General Overhead: This item includes the costs of all departments and staff of the City for providing the coordination of District services, inspections, annual bid management, responding to public concerns, public education, accounting, auditing and procedural matters associated with the District. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 7-City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2010/11 P-518 This item also includes an allocation for general City staff time for administrative functions and systems that provide for a functional and operational assessment district within the City's administrative structure. Interfund Allocation: This item is for night time field verification of street lights working and daytime matching of pole numbers against invoices received to ensure accurate billing. The budget is divided evenly between all of the City's Street Light Maintenance Districts. Capital Expenditures: Capital Projects: This item includes new improvements to further enhance the level and quality of service provided within the boundaries of the District. This may include new or replacement street lights or traffic signals and appurtenant facilities. Operating Reserve Collection: Ooeratina Reserve Collection: This item includes the amount to be collected to maintain reserves to enable the City to pay for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fscal year, or whenever the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The Reserve Fund contribution will continue until such a time the Reserve Fund balance is approximately one half of the annual costs. The fund may be allowed to accumulate in anticipation of any unforeseen expenses not included in the yearly maintenance costs. This may include, but is not limited to, street light or traffic signal replacements, repair of damaged improvements due to vandalism, storms and other similar events. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 7-City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2010/11 P-519 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT General Pursuant to the 1972 Act and Article XIII D, all parcels that have a special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements and services shall be identified, and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel shall be determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of improvements. The 1972 Act, permits the establishment of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include the public lighting facilities, including traffic signals.. Section 22573 of the 1972 Act requires that maintenance assessments must be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. This Section states: 'The nef amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district maybe apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among alt assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefrt to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements. The determination of whether or not a !ot or parcet wilt benefrt f,•om the improvements shall be made pursuant to the Improvement Act of 1911 (Division 7 (commencing with Section 5000) (of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California)." The 1972 Act also permits the designation of zones of benefit within any individual assessment district if "by reasons or variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive different degrees of benefit from the improvement" (Sec. 22574). Article XIII D, Section 4(a) of the California Constitution limits the amount of any assessment to the proportional special benefit conferred on the property. Article XIII D also provides that publicly owned properties must be assessed unless there is clear and convincing evidence that those properties receive no special benefit from the assessment. Exempted from the assessment would be the areas of public streets, public avenues, public lanes, public roads, public drives, public courts, public alleys, public easements and rights-of-ways, public greenbelts and public parkways. The net amount to be assessed may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels. Proposition 218, approved by the voters in November 1996, requires the City to separate general benefit from special benefit, where only special benefit is assessed. Special Benefit The maintenance and servicing of the improvements within the District (which are described in the Description of Improvements and Services Section of this report) are for the benefit of the properties within the District, and as such confer a special and direct benefit to parcels within the District by: • improving the livability, safety, appearance, and desirability for properties within the boundaries of the District, and • ensuring that improvements do not reach a state of deterioration or disrepair so as to be materially detrimental to properties within the District, and Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 7-City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2010/11 P-520 providing fdr safe vehicular and pedestrian access for properties within the District, and providing beautification, shade and overall enhancement to properties within the District. The above mentioned items affect the assessed property in a way that is particular and distinct from their effect on other parcels and that real property in general and the public at large do not share. They contribute to a specific enhancement of the properties within the District. Since these improvements were installed and are maintained specifically for the properties within the District; only properties within the District receive a special benefit and are assessed for said maintenance. Genera! Benefit In addition to the special benefits received by parcels within the District, there are derivative general benefits that are conferred on parcels outside the boundaries of the District which include: • the safety and visual enhancement of the area to persons or vehicles that may travel through the District. However it has been determined that these benefits are dedvative and do not provide a direct benefit to parcels outside of the district that are not being assessed. Method of Assessment Spread Each of the parcels within the District is deemed to receive special benefit from the improvements. Each parcel that has a special benefit conferred upon it as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements are identified and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel is determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of the improvements. When the District was formed in 1990, Article XIII D and Proposition 218 had not yet been passed. Upon the passage of Article XIII D and the subsequent passage of the Proposition Omnibus Implementation Act, new rules were put into place. Due to the changes in legal requirements, as property annexed to the District after the passage of the Assessment Law, the description of the method of assessment became more refined, however, the assessment per parcel has remained the same since the 1996/97 Fiscal Year. Further, no parcel included in the District formation or annexations prior to when the language was refined, are now being levied differently than they were at the time the District was formed or the parcels were annexed. To assess special benefit appropriately, it is necessary to relate the different type of parcel improvements to each other. The Equivalent Dwelling Unit ("EDU") method of apportionment uses the single family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single family home equals one Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU). Every other land-use is converted to EDUs based on an assessment formula that equates to the property's specific development status, type of development (!arid-use), and size of the property, as compared to a single family home. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land-use types, as assigned by County use code, to determine each parcel's EDU assignment. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 7 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 10 Fiscal Year 2010!11 P-521 Land_Use Equivalent Dwelling Units Pro e T e Coun Use Code EDU Value Multi Ifer Single Family Residential 1.00 Parcel Mufti-family Residential 0.50 Unit Non Residential 2.00 Acre The use of the latest County Assessor's Secured RoII shall be the basis for the Property Type determination and units/acreage assignments, unless better data is available to the City. In addition, if any parcel within the District is identified by the County Auditor/Controller to be an invalid parcel number for the current fiscal year, the Property Type and EDU assignment shall be based on the correct parcel number and/or new parcel number(s) County use code and subsequent property information, If a single parcel has changed to multiple parcels, the EDU assignment and assessment amount applied to each of the new parcels will be recalculated rather than spread the proportionate share of the original assessment. The following table summarizes the Fiscal Year 2010/11 maximum allowable assessment rates for the District: Property Type (County Use Code) Maximum Allowable Assessment Rate er EDU Actual Assessment Rate per EDU Total Units/Acres Total EDUs Single Family Residential $33.32 $33.32 3,121.00 3,121.00 Mufti-family Residential 33.32 33.32 0.00 0.00 Non Residential 33.32 33.32 0.00 D.00 The total amount of maintenance and incidental costs for maintaining the streetlights and traffic signals is assessed to the individual parcels of real property within the District in proportion to the special benefit received by such parcels of real property. The proposed individual assessments are shown on the assessment roll in this report. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 7-City of Rancho Cucamonga 11 Fiscal Year 2010!11 P-522 ASSESSMENT D/AGRAM An Assessment Diagram for the District is shown on the following page. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the County Assessor of the County San Bernardino, at the time this report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Engineer's Report. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 7-City of Rancho Cucamonga 12 Fiscal Year 2010/11 '~~ V 'i ,~ 4 V ^~^ A` W `Irl ^~ ~i~t c O -...._ ny ~S.uay~ b D: .~ J m N {p m ~ ~ C U ~ ~ r~ J ~.r m ~ « ~ O li. ..r~..s.. ..~.. ~... i r v~< N Q1 0 0 N O }Se3 cq Ad EPUGMI}~ ~..., ~ 1 i .,.-.; I ~~:_ .. ~.,.I,.,j r 1 A ~ ny la}sayooa ! _ - _ __ ~ ~ •~.. w ~ _ __ ~ ;.... ~ . ny ua~!II!W r._.._.._.._.._.._ ,. _ _ - __ _ . _ _ __ _ ,. i 1 ny ua~!II!W i ~ ~ ~ i ! i i ' ' i ny uaneH ~ I ~ ~ ! -_ _ __.. ......._ i-._..._.. _.._..._ ~nyuaneH • i i ny esow~aH ~ ~ ' _ ~ - _.... _'._ ... . ~. ;---... o n esow~a _ d H i i ny pleq!yo~y ' ~_ __ __ -._ ....._ :_ ._..__ _ ! I .. _ ent/ Pleq!4o~tl s ~ ~ '~ e ny uewllaH i ~. _ ._ .-•~ ny uewllaH ' i '~ ~, ~ fir' L L_ '~?' ! ~ n el~au }S ue!lawe~ ~ ~. _ !n y p _ _ _ _ . MI ,.j ~.. ~ .~1 i ~ '~ ,._:-••~.._.. ..~..,~.__~ ny anal ~• rn -- 3 ~ ~ .._.• a~ ~ o ~ . -o ~ ~ °o ~ ~ c m ti a~ ~ ~ c _ _N m _# ~~ _ ~ ~} s € 1 F P-524 ASSESSMENT ROLL Assessment Roll The assessment roll is a listing of the assessment for Fiscal Year 2010/11 apportioned to each lot or parcel, as shown on the last equalized roll of the Assessor of the County of San Bernardino. The following tables summarize the Fiscal Year 2010/11 maximum and actual assessments for the District: Property Type Coun Use Code Maximum Allowable Assessment Rate r EDU Total UnitslAcres Total EDUs Maximum Allowable Assessment Single Family Residential $33.32 3,121.00 3,121.00 $103,991.72 Multi-family Residential 33.32 0.00 0.00 0.00 Non Residential 33.32 0.00 0.00 0.00 TOTALS 3,121.00 3,121.00 $103,991.72 Property Type Coun Use Code Actual Assessment Rate er EDU Total UnitslAcres Total EDUs Actual Assessment Single Family Residential $33.32 3,121.00 3,121.00 $103,991.72 Multi-family Residential 33.32 0.00 0.00 0.00 Non Residential 33.32 0.00 0.00 0.00 TOTALS 3,121.00 3,121.00 $103,991.72 A copy of the full assessment roll is available for review in the City Clerk's office. Annexations There were no annexations effective for the 2010!11 Fiscal Year. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 7 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 13 Fiscal Year 2010/11 P-525 Revised Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2010/2011 City of Rancho Cucamonga Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 8 (South Etiwanda) P-526 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. (SOUTH ETIWANDA) 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Phone: 909.477.2740 Fax: 909.477.2741 cITY couNCIL Donald J. Kurth, Mayor L. Dennis Michael, Mayor Pro Tem Rex Gutierrez, Council Member Sam Spagnolo, Council Member Diane Williams, Council Member CITY STAFF John R. Giilison, Assistant City Manager Linda D. Daniels, Deputy City Manager William Wittkopf, Public Works Director Jeff Barnes, Park and Landscape Superintendent Ingrid Y. Bruce, GIS/Special Districts Manager Christopher Bopko, Management Analyst III P-527 TABLE OF CONTENTS ENGINEER'S LETTER INTRODUCTION 1 3 Reason for Assessment .............................................................................................3 Process for Annual Assessment .................................................................................3 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS 5 Description of the Boundaries of the District ...............................................................5 Description of Improvements and Services ................................................................5 Map of Improvements .................................................................................................5 ESTIMATE OF COSTS 6 District Budget ............................................................................................................6 Definitions of Budget Items .........................................................................................7 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT 9 Genera I .......................................................................................................................9 Special Benefit ...........................................................................................................9 General Benefit ........................................................................................................10 Method of Assessment Spread ................................................................................10 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM ASSESSMENT ROLL 12 13 Assessment Roll .......................................................................................................13 Annexations ..............................................................................................................13 P-528 ENGINEER'S LETTER WHEREAS, on ,the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga (the "City"), under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 (the "1972 Act") adopted its Resolution No. _, a Resolution Initiating Proceedings for the Levy of Annual Assessments for Street Light Maintenance District No. 8 (South Etiwanda) (the "District"); and WHEREAS, the Resolution Initiating Proceedings directed NBS to prepare and file an Engineer's Report for Fiscal Year 2010111 pursuant to the requirements of the 1972 Act. The Engineer's Report presents the plans and specifications describing the general nature, location and extent of the improvements to be maintained, an estimate of the costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements for the District for the referenced fiscal year, a diagram for the District, showing the area and properties proposed to be assessed, and an assessment of the estimated costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing the improvements, assessing the net amount upon all assessable lots and/or parcels within the District in proportion to the special benefit received; and NOW THEREFORE, the following assessment is proposed to be authorized in order to pay the estimated costs of maintenance, operation and servicing of the improvements to be paid by the assessable real property within the boundaries of the District in proportion to the special benefit received. The following table summarizes the proposed assessment. SUMMARY OF ASSESSMENT Fiscal Year 2010/11 Total Estimated Assessment $119,989.92 Plus Anticipated Delinquency Penalty 8 Interest 22 160.08 Total Estimated Revenue $142,150.00 Plus Reserve Fund Contribution 241 440.00 Total Expenditure Budget $383,590.00 Total District EDU Count 1,960.94 Actual Assessment per EDU $193.75 Maximum Allowable Assessment per EDU $193.75 In making the assessments contained herein pursuant to the 1972 Act: I have identified ail parcels which will have a special beneft conferced upon them from the improvements described in the Special Benefit Section of this Engineer's Report (the "Specially Benefited Parcels"). For particulars as to the identification of said parcels, reference is made to the Assessment Diagram, a copy of which is included in this Engineer's Report. I have evaluated the costs and expenses of the improvements upon the Specially Benefited Parcels. In making such evaluation: Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 8 -City of Rancho Fiscal Year 2010/11 P-529 a. The proportionate special benefit derived by each Specially Benefited Parcel from the improvements was determined in relationship to the entirety of the maintenance costs of the improvements; b. No assessment has been imposed on any Specially Benefited Parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on such parcel from the improvements; and c. Any general benefits from the improvements have been separated from the special benefits and only special benefits have been assessed. I, the undersigned, respectfully submit the enclosed Engineer's Report and, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, the Engineer's Report, Assessments, and the Assessment Diagram herein have been prepared and computed in accordance with the order of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Assessment Law. Mark Stever, City Engineer Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 8 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2010/11 P-530 INTRODUCTION Reason for Assessment Approval of the assessment covered by this Engineer's Report will generate the revenue necessary to: Provide for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements described in this Engineer's Report. Maintenance may include but is not limited to, all of the following: the repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement. Servicing means the furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operating and servicing of any improvement. Servicing shall also include vehicle, equipment, capital improvements and administrative costs associated with the annual administration and_operation of the District. Process for Annual Assessment The City cannot levy and collect annual assessments within the District without complying with the procedures specified in the 1972 Act. On an annual basis, an Engineer's Report must be prepared which contains a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the district. The City Council must also adopt a resolution of intention which: • Declares the intention of the City Council to levy and collect assessments within the assessment district for the fiscal year stated therein. • Generally describes the existing and proposed improvements and any substantial changes proposed to be made in existing improvements. • Refers to the assessment district by its distinctive designation and indicate the general location of the district. • Refers to the report of the engineer, on file with the clerk, for a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable Tots and parcels of land within the distdct. • Gives notice of the time and place for public hearing by the City Council on the levy of the proposed assessment. • States whether the assessment is proposed to increase from the previous year. If the assessments are to be levied in the same or lesser amounts than the maximum assessment amount approved, the clerk shall give notice by causing the resolution of intention to tie published. Any interested person may, prior to the conclusion of the public hearing, file a written protest which shall state all grounds of objection. The protest shall contain a description sufficient to identify the property owned by the property owner filing the protest. During the course or upon conclusion of the hearing, the City Council may order changes in any of the matters provided in the report, including changes in the improvements, any zones within the assessment district, and the proposed diagram or the proposed assessment. The City Council, upon conclusion of the public hearing must then adopt a resolution confirming the diagram and assessment, either as originally proposed or as changed by it. The adoption of the resolution shall constitute the levy of an assessment for the fiscal year referred to in the assessment. If the assessment to be levied exceeds the maximum assessment amount previously approved, the City must comply with the procedures specified in Article XIII D and Proposition 218. The voters in the State of California in November 1996 added Article XIII D to the Cal'rfomia Constitution imposing, Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 8 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 3 Fiscal Year 2010111 P-531 among other requirements, the necessity for the City to conduct an assessment ballot procedure to enable the owners of each property on which assessments are proposed to be enacted or increased, the opportunity to express their support for, or opposition to the proposed assessment or increase in such assessment. The basic steps of the assessment ballot procedure are outlined below. The City must prepare a Notice of Public Hearing ("Notice"), which describes, along with other mandated information, the reason for the proposed assessments, and to provide a date and time of a public hearing to be held on the matter. The City must also prepare an assessment ballot, which clearly gives the property owner the ability to sign and mark their assessment ballot either in favor of, or in opposition to the proposed assessment. The Notice and assessment ballot are mailed to each affected property owner within the District a minimum of 45 days prior to the public hearing date as shown in the Notice. The City may also hold community meetings with the property owners to discuss the issues facing the District and to answer property owner questions directly. After the Notice and assessment ballot are mailed, property owners are given until the close of the public hearing, stated in the Notice, to return their signed and marked assessment ballot. During the public hearing, property owners are given the opportunity to address the City Council and ask questions or voice their concerns. At the public hearing, the returned assessment ballots received prior to the close of the public hearing are tabulated, weighted by the proposed assessment amount on each property and the results are announced by the City Council. Article XIII D provides that if, as a result of the assessment ballot proceeding, a majority protest is found to exist, the City Council shall not have the authority to levy and collect the assessments as proposed. A majority protest exists if the assessments represented by ballots submitted in opposition exceed those submitted in favor of the assessment. All retumed ballots are tabulated and weighted according to the financial obligation of each particular parcel. If there is no majority protest as described above, the City Council may approve the proposed assessments. If there is a majority protest, as described above, the City will not levy and collect any assessments. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 8 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2010/11 P-532 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS The District provides for the administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing of various improvements located within the public right-of-way and dedicated easements within the boundaries of the District. Description of the Boundaries of the District The District is located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California. The boundaries of the District are generally described as that area of the City known as South Etiwanda, which is generally bounded by Etiwanda Avenue on the west, Highland Avenue on the north and Foothill Boulevard on the south. The southern portion of the District is bounded by East Avenue on the east and the northern portion of the District is bounded by the 15 Freeway on the east. Reference is also made to the Assessment Diagram included in this Report. Description of Improvements and Services The improvements are the maintenance and servicing of street lights, traffic signals and appurtenant facilities throughout the District. The maintenance and servicing includes, but is not limited to, furnishing electric current for public lighting facilities including street lights and traffic signals, and associated appurtenant facilities. Services include personnel, materials, contracting services, utilities, and all necessary costs associated with the maintenance, replacement and repair required to keep the improvements in operational and satisfactory condition. In addition, it is the City's intention to continue to use cost effective materials, in order to lower expenses of the District. Map of Improvements The following page shows the map of street light and traffic signal improvements to be maintained using District funds. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 8 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2010/11 Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 8 Street Lights and Traffic Signals Improvements v~ ~~s BASE LINE RD FooniaL BL Legend • SCE Streetlights i Traffic Signal Light ------- City Boundary ~:" SLD8 Boundary •ugawimu~-~M q~b Yuen P-534 ESTIMATE OF COSTS The estimated costs of administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing the improvements as described in the Plans and Specifications are summarized below. Each year, as part of the assessment district levy calculation process, the costs and expenses are reviewed and the annual costs are projected for the following fiscal year. District Estimated 2010111 Bud et Personnel Services Regular Payroll $20,310.00 Part-time Salaries 0.00 Fringe Benefits 9.550.00 Subtotal Personnel $29,660.00 Operations and Maintenance Training $180.00 Membership Dues 30.00 Operations and Maintenance 4,940.00 Equipment Operations and Maintenance 0.00 Contract Services 14,670.00 Utilities Telephone Utilities 0.00 Electric Utilities 58,300.00 Assessment Administration - 9,390.00 General Overhead 26,930.00 Interfund Allocation 16.290.00 Subtotal Operations and Maintenance $132,730.00 Capital Expenditures Capital Projects $221.000.00 Subtotal Capital Expenditures $221,000.00 Total District Expenditure Budget $383,590.00 Total Estimated Assessment $119,969.92 Plus Anticipated Delinquency Penalty & Interest 22.160.08 Total Estimated Revenue $142,150.00 Plus Operating Reserve Fund Contribution 241.440.00 Total Expenditure Budget $383,590.00 Total Estimated Assessment $119,969.92 Total District EDU Count 1,960.94 Actual Assessment per EDU -Fiscal Year 2010/11 $61.19 Maximum Allowable Assessment er EOU -Fiscal Year 2010!11 $193.75 The maximum allowable assessment per EDU listed in the District budget above, is the amount which was approved in 1996/97 and subsequent District annexations. Each year, prior to the assessments being placed on the tax roll, the City will review the budget and determine the amount needed to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 8 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2010111 P-535 maintain the improvements for the upcoming fiscal year. The actual assessment per EDU will be based on the total amount of funds needed to maintain the improvements in a satisfactory and healthy condition. The actual assessment amount may be lower than the maximum allowable assessment; however it may not exceed the maximum unless the increase is approved by the property owners in accordance with Proposition 218. It is the intent of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to maintain an Operating Reserve which shall not exceed the estimated costs of maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or when the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The reserve balance information for the District is as follows: Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2010 Reserve Fund Balance $2,484,928.54 Operating Reserve Contribution -Fiscal Year 2010!11 (241,440.00) Operating Reserve Collection -Fiscal Year 2010/11 0.00 Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2011 Reserve Fund Balance $2,243,488.54 Definitions of Budget Items The following definitions describe the costs and expenses included in the District Budget Personnel Services Regular Salaries: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all full-time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Part Time Salaries: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all part time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Fringe Benefits: This item includes the benefits available to City employees: health care, vacation, sick time, and retirement fund. Operations and Maintenance Contract Services: GIS services for maintaining the street lights and traffic signals database. This is a combination of field and office work and is split evenly between all of the City's Street Light Maintenance Districts. Membership Dues: ISMA Certification. The cost is split evenly between all of the City's Street light and Maintenance Districts. Utilities -Electric: This item includes the costs to furnish electricity required for the operation and maintenance of the street lights and traffic signals. Assessment Administration: This item includes the cost to all particular departments and staff of the City, and consultants for providing the administration, coordination and management of District services, operations, and incidental expenses related to the District. This item also includes creation of an annual engineer's report, resolutions and placing the assessment amounts onto the County tax roll each year, along with responding to any public inquiries and future Proposition 218 balloting proceedings. General Overhead: This item includes the costs of all departments and staff of the City for providing the coordination of District services, inspections, annual bid management, responding to public concerns, public education, accounting, auditing and procedural matters associated with the District. Stree! Lighting Maintenance District No. 8 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2010/t 1 P-536 This item also includes an allocation for general City staff time for administrative functions and systems that provide for a functional and operational assessment district within the City's administrative structure. Interfund Allocation: This item is for night time field verification of street lights working and daytime matching of pole numbers against invoices received to ensure accurate billing. The budget is divided evenly between all of the City's Street Light Maintenance Districts. Capital Expenditures: Capital Projects: This item includes new improvements to further enhance the level and quality of service provided within the boundaries of the District. This may include new or replacement street lights or traffic signals and appurtenant facilities. Operating Reserve Collection: Operating Reserve Collection: This item includes the amount to be collected to maintain reserves to enable the City to pay for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or whenever the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The Reserve Fund contribution will continue until such a time the Reserve Fund balance is approximately one half of the annual costs. The fund may be allowed to accumulate in anticipation of any unforeseen expenses not included in the yearly maintenance costs. This may include, but is not limited to, street light or traffic signal replacements, repair of damaged improvements due to vandalism, storms and other similar events. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 8 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2010/11 P-537 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT General Pursuant to the 1972 Act and Article XIII D, all parcels that have a special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements and services shall be identified, and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel shall be detennined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of improvements. The 1972 Act, permits the establishment of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include the public lighting facilities, including traffic signals.. Section 22573 of the 1972 Act requires that maintenance assessments must be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. This Section states: 'The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district maybe apportioned by any formula or method which faidy distdbutes the net amount among all assessable lots or paroels in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements. The determination of whether or not a Ict cr parcel will benefit from the improvements shall be made pursuant to the Improvement Act of 1911 (Division 7 (commencing with Section 5000) (of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California]." The 1972 Act also permits the designation of zones of benefit within any individual assessment district if "by reasons or variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive different degrees of benefit from the improvement" (Sec. 22574). Article XIII D, Section 4(a) of the California Constitution limits the amount of any assessment to the proportional special benefit conferred on the property. Article XIII D also provides that publicly owned properties must be assessed unless there is clear and convincing evidence that those properties receive no special benefit from the assessment. Exempted from the assessment would be the areas of public streets, public avenues, public lanes, public roads, public drives, public courts, public alleys, public easements and rightsof-ways, public greenbelts and public parkways. The net amount to be assessed may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels. Proposition 218, approved by the voters in November 1996, requires the City to separate general benefit from special benefit, where only special benefit is assessed. Benefit The maintenance and servicing of the improvements within the District (which are described in the Description of Improvements and Services Section of this report) are for the benefit of the properties within the District, and as such confer a special and direct benefit to parcels within the District by: • improving the livability, safety, appearance, and desirability for properties within the boundaries of the District, and • ensuring that improvements do not reach a state of deterioration or disrepair so as to be materially detrimental to properties within the District, and Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 8 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2010!11 P-538 • providing for safe vehicular and pedestrian access for properties within the District, and • providing beautification, shade and overall enhancement to properties within the District. The above mentioned items affect the assessed property in a way that is particular and distinct from their effect on other parcels and that real property in general and the public at large do not share. They contribute to a specifc enhancement of the properties within the District. Since these improvements were installed and are maintained specifically for the properties within the District; only properties within the District receive a special benefit and are assessed for said maintenance. General Benefit In addition to the special benefits received by parcels within the District, there are derivative general benefits that are conferred on parcels outside the boundaries of the District which include: • the safety and visual enhancement of the area to persons or vehicles that may travel through the District. However it has been determined that these bene its are derivative and do not provide a direct benefit to parcels outside of the district that are not being assessed. Method of Assessment Each of the parcels within the District is deemed to receive special benefit from the improvements. Each parcel that has a special benefit conferred upon it as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements are identified and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel is determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of the improvements. When the District was formed in 1990, Article XIII D and Proposition 218 had not yet been passed. Upon the passage of Article XIII D and the subsequent passage of the Proposition Omnibus Implementation Act, new rules were put into place. Due to the changes in legal requirements, as property annexed to the District after the passage of the Assessment Law, the description of the method of assessment became more refined, however, the assessment per parcel has remained the same since the 1996197 Fiscal Year. Further, no parcel included in the District formation or annexations prior to when the language was refined, are nova being levied differently than they were at the time the District was formed or the parcels were annexed. To assess special benefit appropriately, it is necessary to relate the different type of parcel improvements to each other. The Equivalent Dwelling Unit ("EDU") method of apportionment uses the single family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single family home equals one Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU). Every other land-use is converted to EDUs based on an assessment formula that equates to the property's specific development status, type of development (land-use), and size of the property, as compared to a single family home. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land-use types, as assigned by County use code, to determine each parcel's EDU assignment. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 8 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 10 Fiscal Year 2010/11 P-539 Land-Use Eoulvalent Dwelling Units Pro e T e Coun Use Code EDU Value Multi lier Single Family Residential 1.00 Parcel Multi-family Residential 0.50 Unit Non Residential 2.00 Acre The use of the latest County Assessor's Secured Roll shall be the basis for the Property Type determination and units/acreage assignments, unless better data is available to the City. In addition, if any parcel within the District is identified by the County AuditorlController to be an invalid parcel number for the current fiscal year, the Property Type and EDU assignment shall be based on the correct parcel number and/or new parcel number(s) County use code and subsequent property information. If a single parcel has changed to multiple parcels, the EDU assignment and assessment amount applied to each of the new parcels will be recalculated rather than spread the proportionate share of the original assessment. The following table summarizes the Fiscal Year 20 i 0111 maximum allowable assessment rates for the District: Property Type (County Use Code) Maximum Allowable Assessment Rate er EDU Actual Assessment Rate per EDU Total UnitslAcres Total EDUs Single Family Residential $193.75 $61.19 1,688 1,688 Multi-family Residential 193.75 61.t9 420 210 Non Residential 193.75 61.19 31.46 62.92 The total amount of maintenance and incidental costs far maintaining the streetlights and traffic signals is assessed to the individual parcels of real property within the District in proportion to the special benefit received by such parcels of real property. The proposed individual assessments are shown on the assessment roll in this report. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 8 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 11 Fiscal Year 201011 t P-540 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM An Assessment Diagram for the District is shown on the following page. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the County Assessor of the County San Bernardino, at the time this report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Engineer's Report. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 8 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 12 Fiscal Year 2010/11 P-541 DO w ~~ V *+ E' ~ i = v ~ o ¢ ~ ~° ~ ~ N ~ - ... - _.... ny lway~ ~ ~' o h _ ~~~.._.._.._ ~ J t.. o (73 ~ I ~ N >; ~ 53 ' ~ O C ; ; j ~ r 3 0 S ' I lL 5~ `n ° ~ i I I ! nb' isa3 in ~~c S: ! ny epuemi}3 ~ _ e ny epuen~!}g i i ~ ~ i J ! ~ ~ ~ E • ~ ! .. .:fir- i ' rt.+ ~8 ~aaJ~ Fed- i ~ ii i ny Ja}sayooy ~ ~~.. ~ i ~ i.... o ... ' { ny ua~!II!W f._.._.._.. _.......i :.. .___ i _.. ;_ ! ny ua~!II!W i ~ a i ~ u ny uaneH !. _ ........_~ :_ i. ..... .i.. _ ____ ;.. .;.-...__....._ ~. 'ny uaneH i ~ ; ; i { j ~ ~ i. ny esowJaH j i i.. ... 1. _.. . ~. ; , .. .... .. ~ . .._...' ny esow~aH i i d PI 4 4 d ~ _.. ;.. _. ...... ! n e ! a~ ' I , i 4ny PIe9!yoJb' I i i j B ny uewllaH i { ~, _ 'I. _._.... `: .... .....-~..•• ~ ny uewllaH i ~~~ In L ! ny pJe au!n i i i L.... ! ~ : ~r~ ~:._i ~ FgS e~i ~ `C ' ~ •~ 2' ~..~•_'Y..i.... ...,: .. _s nt/anOJ~ ga4~Dp Q{•E~~eF~¢ _ •~~ rn y ~ o m s E r.._..~_.._..~. _.._. ~ H O ~dgztE~p ~~ 'p (0 O Q s e H i`'. ~ ~ m u_ €€p~g¢etgg{{;E = m gEFSSs~5 S~dfgel; Efft~ze{1Y °a °~~ gp~ja~=~~~~~ ~~ Szaza zF@@~~k 0.5cE gg&n $. 5Fi 6~ -Z t} F2ke EkY<Bc P-542 ASSESSMENT ROLL Assessment Roll The assessment roll is a listing of the assessment for Fiscal Year 2010/11 apportioned to each lot or parcel, as shown on the last equalized roll of the Assessor of the County of San Bernardino. The following tables summarize the Fiscal Year 2010/11 maximum and actual assessments for the District: Property Type Coun Use Code Maximum Allowable Assessment Rate er EDU Totai UnitslAcres Total EDUs Maximum Allowable Assessment Single Family Residential $193.75 1,688 1,668 $327,050.00 Multi-family Residential 193.75 420 210 40,687.50 Non Residential 193.75 31.47 62.94 12,194.63 TOTALS 2,139.47 1,960.94 $379,932.13 Property Type Coun Use Code Actual Assessment Rate er EDU Total UnitslAcres Total EDUs Actual Assessment Single Family Residential $61.19 1,688 1,688 $103,288.72 Multi-family Residential 61.19 420 210 12,849.90 Non Residential 61.19 31.47 62.94 3,851.30 TOTALS 2,139.47 1,960.94 $119,989.92 A copy of the full assessment roll is available for review in the City Clerk's office. AnneXat/ORS The following annexations are effective for the 2010/11,Fiscal Year: Assessor's Parcel Annexation Total Total Property Type Number Date Pro'ect UnitslAcres EDUs Coun Use Code 0228-011-31, 5/6/2009 DRC2003-00048 0.00 0.00 Vacant 0228-011-38 Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 8-City of Rancho Cucamonga 13 Fiscal Year 2010/11 ~V 0 ~' O .s v c OG 0 ~~ -~ .~.~ ~~ ~ ~j .- v ,.~..~ ~ ~. _ ~y . }+ ~+ ~ ~ ~ L ._ a 3 Q .__ .~ Q /~ •= AV W v+Q N ~.. ~..~ "" ro w •~ Vl d A a ~~ .. C7 t 0 U U ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ ~ O ~ Q ~ n' W y ~ U ~ C -~ ~ ~o oU ~ ~ •~ U ~ ~W ~ U ~ to ~ ~ ~ ~V ~ ~ ~ O Q ~= O U c~ w ~~ ~ '~ ~'~.+ ~ ~ N ~ N ~ ~ ~ •i `~ ~ ~ h ~ ~ (~ ~ _ ] y N W~~ ^C y V •V ~= ~_ y .~ ~ _ .~ ~~~ i~+ ~ O Lw o ~c°~° ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ y ~ . V O v'~'- ~ O w c ~.,..y~ ~ ~o~~ o ~ (~ ~ ~ ~ C ~ y ~ v ~. Q ,o ~ ,y N t y y ~~ ~ 3 ~ W ~ ~ I a a y ;~.. y V V .~ }f's: ~ 3 Q C~ .~. ~ =~ ~ ~' ~~ .~ ~~ v ~~? i""i ~ i Q ~I.~ ~ ~ _ O y ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ a ~ ~ ,o~~a~ N W .~ '~ ~~ ~ ~ Q ~~ ~ ~ O N ~ O p ~~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ p O i ~ y ~ i = ~~~.~ O y Q 3 ~ ea ~ N '^ ~ O V - .~ ~ ~ ~ •-+ i~ ~ ~ O ~ 3 ~ ~ = oo ,a~ .~ o v c~oa .N M ~ ~ ,_ ~ _ V ~~ ~ O cv ~ ~ •~ s ~ ~ O }' ~ ~Q~3 t ~ •- a ~~~^ cola ~~~~ //w/\\ - I w Z--- ~. ~' U U O _. U Z ~, :, ., ~~ ~ ~ :~ ~ ~. ~~~ ~W ~? ~~ O' ,. , .... . 'vJY':. ~. . U -~ I ~, W Cn _. ~. ~~ W H Z W! Z- O ~' U Q z w U U O a€ L m ` 'O t ~ ~ C C ~'' N O ~ ~ J m Z D y ~ 0 y H ~ . + ~~ ~ A N C ~ ~ O m ~ v ~ m ~ ~ =m u . .co N s ~ ~.• c °' ea -~v Em ~ ~ 00~ °. 3,0 ~ m o o ~ ~ ea eca _ o. c ~' m o = m c~ ~ v W "- Z ._ D. c c vs ca m a ~ co '~ o eo ~ m ~~ °- 'H~~~ m ~ a m H H Vmi ~ as m m E o ° ° o~ y • • • • N C O N m .~.r L m N c ea -C ~ y A. w w ~ .C ~ ~ a •y . ~ 'y~ ~. a a ~ a °' °' a a ~ ~ N ' O 3 ~ c ~~ ~ a~ o a~ ~ ~ V y Z ~ V ~ C V Q ~ ~ y w ~ ~ ~ N1 s ~~Q ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~+ ~ V ~ Q~ _ L ~ V L ~ N O C ~ O O ~ 0. ~ Q 0 ~ ~~ = L ~ ~ V . ~ m L N Cf ~C C O~ C d ~ d ~ d ~~.c .p NC~ U ~ cA t~ ~ .~~v 2 ~ •~ ~~ -- - - ---__ _ _ ...~-~ --- -- -- -,~.~:-A --- ~' ~ ~° ~, ~ w a N N ~ y~C 0 to ~~ `.' ~ yam a~ ~ ~ +..~ ~ N L N O N C N .C ~~ ~~ C t6 c J`~ a O N J~ m '~ a`cnE~U~o~~o~.~nubiin~>~cg~c$~m°v~U~c~niia~v~i~: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 000 0 00000 ~o o ^ a ^ ^ ^ ^ o a o00 ^ ^^oo^i `°~ ~ 1 LL Cl R r 0 4 a. ~ ~ ~~ n {~'~! N gjs~ ~o gp ~p g gar so ~o y .Y yqgI L ~ 17 ~ N M 11 M ~ ~t if i! C ~' ~ x F g ~ ~ ` ~ ~ ! ac ~ ~ 'LL ~ FL° e ^ ^ m^~^~0~0-~.' ® ~ m u ~ ~. ~l >f i ~ F ~ `-~~ ~ ~Y~~j n ~~~,~ DOS v ~ N ~_eaa ~ ~ Ali E ~ ®~ ^ • r ~ ~) ~} 1 ~ ~ ~ ~~~~~ of ~• $~ ~ ~• ~~ ,SCI - £ d_ C7 Z N~ F~1 N H H ~ x x o c 7 ~^ r"~ ~ a 16 ~ ~ ~ ~ O m C x r r b b ~ ~ ~ x x Q m x x x x M M M ~ Y ~ x x 7tl O O1 ~ ` ~ ~ ~ ~ x x x x x x ~ ~ u 5 d ~ iW H N t~ :r :r <c ad 9 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ A r ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Y5 i a c ~ ~ = a C ~' ~ ~ ~ ~ u~ - ppp - ~ U ~~ y~ yq 8 N W ' 4 Y 7 V C ~ N F1 ~= 3 a' ~ ~~'~u~~~~~~ ~ Ui$~bi~7i~o~ct~i~~~a S°~vi~~Ef. ^a^^^o^^^^^^^ o o ^^^^^ ^o^oao~ ~ .1 n v Y r a g 0 V ~iI <ttt~ ^~ ^ ~ C tr @ oNat c ~ ~Y3 °' ~ • a .~ 8~ ' u :> Esc ~ ~i ~ Y c ~ ZJ WHH 8 gm_ ~ • WJ ~ m~ ~z~` ar ~"sue i b ~ a j 1 ®~ ®F * ~- Y ~i~e®1 ~ ~, ~ d o,t~ +'} a ~ a d ~ c~~~.4s : ~ / ~~ P'~~fod ~y~ > 0~~ ~ ,t ^ ~~~~Y - Y ~il ~~ Y ~ ~ a t~ z~ € p~~ •i ~ W r ~ ~~ W~"g~ _ I s t ~S ~ ~ vv~~ u~OZ t~ g ~~~~_ ~ z~ @ v O W o f zu a I ~ ~~ ~~~~~ a 3~~~~ ~ ` ~~ • A~ ,A 0~ i~ ~~ I~ i d z i u ~~a<$ w g~ a° s Z m' za wz $a, yZ ~b wa o~ ~~W~'s a a c z g N N C7 ~ ~~ °: c ` ._ N Q O ++ V !~ cp ~ ~+ O ~ ~ ~ R a~° ~ ~ ~° w ~ 'a~ ~ :° =o a N ~ Q d C N 3 ~ C ~ Q3> gga~ ig6 €3 1 ~ ~~ e gg~g3 a, $ ~ ~f6 I4~ ~ i €~ ~~ 3 @p BE e $$ v ~ '~ 01 ~`+ N ~ N '~ a o cYi ~`w°m ~ c ~ . ~. y ~c ~, ~ 0~30 ~ ' + N + ~ !0 N C k O .V ` C V `'y ~ d ea m W Q d C.'a ~~ ~~ e~ 'si I ~~9 x~ ~ ~ ~ I I ~I 0 ~~ ~~ a ~ O ~ gy=p r ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r ~ m ~ ~ m o ~ ` co d m ~ Q' ° a ~ a> ~ R r ca c N ~V N ' ~ C~ 'C ~ ~ ' w 8 V Q a ` 3 ~ V -~ ~ ~ ~, V 7 Q a O ~t~ a ~ ~' N Q .d ~ d w ~~ N V -p 7 d d~ N O 3 R Qt W O C ~ `' L ._ O ; ~ ~. ~~ x c~ -=~ ~ z ._ v ~. ~.. ~ +> ~. ~~* ®~ ~;:: s ~~ oo:::::::~::~~.~o~^ O ~' ~, d ~ C N Df C i m SOW ~ c~ ea ,oNdE c ~ m _~ ~ Nt~ fn N ,_ m W V1~~+N LL ~+C V'Dd 3~~ v~ d s t d = O H O N ~ CN O ~~ 0>Q~mJ'0 M C N N N J m ~+ 7 v C ~+ C N m~ N N •+ ~ V Q V N V C N~ +:. i N V~ Q~ N H m H C N N +N+ m ~vNQt? ~tn~GGGe~G~~~ `~ N G. N ~ :~ ~ N pp y O • • • • • • V) 'a E M ~ ~ ~, _-- C ~ AA T ~U IIp~ W ~ ^!. 1 L m •\ IIINNNII'III •~CHERRY AV pp f~h~"~ ~'I •~~ C l',, t ~,••~ il' oN 4 i ! ~.~~ ~, J~ ~ I B -: ~ .:. ExBT-AY•-+~. ~•", -MCKCRY AV• I 1 ~ p ~ • ~> ~~ ~CI - ~ ~ ~,~ '~ ~ PECAN AV I ...y-- a K ~- e' g : -- --AY YgMMli3.-.-.-. L--l r.i ~ F BLUECRA88 AV ° i I ~' .= 1B N33L~AYD '~ m C ~4 ~AV L3IJONBt1 0 - i i G- ~ -t 1 1+'1DN r r. ~ ~ ~ i ~~ 1 nrHD>;rnesar,e ~ ~ ~ , ~ - _.~.-,T 1 ~~MILLIKENAV ~ ffi I r I ~ 7^ r f }T , ~. ~ aY Av ~t l I I ~ ~ nr t3LSINV7 ' ., l [LI l SP~B AV ~' ~jY.~ ~ 6z - ~ { f J j ~ ~ 1 l.. Y ~' r 9 Pi I ~ F `'~AYra1IlVA f~q,Mro ~LT,~'-I U11U AV IfTICA A+~ ~ ' ~ ~ ~ AV I __ ~~ liN EN `. g ` ip Q S i~i V I 'j-.~ I ~,.,-. 1.~~:~ ~ f '.~~._r /ERMDBA AV 1.. 5 ~ W _ ~ ~~~ J -.-~_ ~ . _~ ARCWBALD AV -~h° 1 . o -AV 3L30K . -.;- AMETI/YBT AV :' O 'T.~ -~-{ C' I ~ ~ HEILMAN AV : ~ , -~ I ~~j 13 NOI7 o• ~ g, _ ~.~• ,-- _ .: . -. BERYL 87 + ~ ~ ~(~ ~ ~+ AY OIIYA3NY1 ~_ ` m ~ f, :.-- '~ .' CARNELIAN BTI I I~J'~{~_ r"'t .........' ~ ~ . JASPER BT ~~~ ~~I - AY L3)IYS ~1 ~ ' I _ 18 NNW31 ': . ~ I sue' •1 ~ ~~ IRE 87!~I I A , - ~ + -.- S PPH i ~ L .I ivROUasE Av Z C L i aU C H ~ H ~~ y .. _ G> > C V Cy~~, ~ C c ~ d ~,~~c • m '~ N ~ m •' a . aacv}, ~ ' ~ cn ~ cvtnc ~ a '~ Q r~ e S Z Q ~~ V L .~ 0 ~~ :~ V ~+ L L .~ V ~~ O d s}s~\ ~/~ ~- Z ~~ i, ! i ~, ,E} k 0 ` 'sari 6 .~a ~ • ~~s i + mY.a,W+a !~ ___ o~c ~. r ~ !s~ ~>,r~~ ~ P • t ~ • t ~x 9' 4 d~ ~ ~~ ' ~. ~~ ,. ~ ~ • ~rt~ I V e. i ~ -! ~ ~ i u nruE~ W ~ . ~a10iMCMR Ma~11Aa CI, r~ • `~~~Rd - 3 L 1 j niwioiv ~~ _. _ , t F , _, ~y '3 ~ • r ~ ~ u~ w Y v- . °' ~ ~~ `^`^ yyl ~Tq~ri~= ~ 6r . ~~ M4Mpr~~A r . a ~ _ ~ ~1aI19 ~ t ~~ ~ oar~ ~ woM .-~.c ~cY # ~ ~~ ` 'lW • ' . a s ~Ig ~ ® M.~a~gd ~ . ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~~ '~ ~ = ,o, • u~~p ~ri nnaa~rlr ~b~, ~ •eeorre; ~ ~ j , _ r ~ V ~ ~• ~f C ~ K S ~ .uea.rK ~ _ ~' RC 1205 RC1305 Z ~ RC1405 F i ~ ! ~`' 8 .,. NN E ~' ~ 1 . ~ ~~' '~ ! ~ 1 1 ~ - AIMOMD CT .. o r , . , .. ~ 1 •~ .., ~ ~,. 1 s ~ 1 1 ~ ~ "' 8 ~tM rug ~ 1 tlN .. ., ww u.. 1 ~ 1 a ~ ,., ~ 1 -~ ~- 1 ~ ~ 1 e« bw _ sM ~ -TNI ~ w ~- ~ ~ nN ~ ~ o »w w^ ar ~ ~W - 1 i Asa 1 f 1 ~r ~ 'w ~ 1 I e M ~ .N ». w.. fw. ~ r ~ i 1 Yp t1N ~ lW wY Mb ~tU ~tU .~ l1i~ MN 1 ~ ~ 1 •r rw w:+ R# .rs /W bu N f Nu ' .. MW NY ~ pN Rw W /1N Ntl bb f Rb 11 1 1l 1 j Ku 1 aN uu NN acu Nv w ab 1 ,. «Y .~. wY ~tl ~. w~ ..u. .u. u~ Ntl AIbCM~l1LD 1 ~ 1 ~ 111 wN .N ~ w. w. w~ ~ I1N .., ~ .w Nw ... ~w ... i .. ~. ~ ww rW NN ww 1 1 ! i # 1 i 1 ~ .w. ~ W. Nw bN ~,.. .,. .,. l ~ Mw rN /W lM Np IW x -b. 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 1 1 ~ ~ 333 1 u.. ~. uw rw lb~ i 1 1 ~ 6 - ` --. AMETNYfT AY ~ • • wM wt p S ~ ~ ~ I • ~i t J s 3 1' ~ 1 ll l ~~~, .~ ~~'~ eozt~a 0 M r V ~~ 55 N 0 N eoE~~a eob~~a U1 _~ f0 C Q N f0 U 0 0 N ~ ~ `~ ~r.- Z g .. .,, ~ i, h h - _- ._,. 1 h ~ h K . __.~ +. _..._ . ~..~pp '- ~+ ~ dt 1 r 1 s Z g~ R 1 ~' V Q L ~. ~+ ~. ~ ~ U o ~ ~ ~ U ~~ Q O ~ s U ~ C ~ ~ O ~ ,~, ~ ~ o j ~ ~' .. }- •- ~ N _ ~ ~ i.., ~ ~ ~ . _ •- ~ o ,~ ~ o L O ~ r ^ V ^ V, ~ I a~ 0 C (6 U U 0 U .~ L ^o I..L U c .~ C C N -~ .L O 0 ~ ~ •~ O U ~ ~ ~ •- O .~ ~ Q ~ ~- O .U ~ ~ (~ ~ ~~ ~ ~_ ~ U ~U ~~ • • • ._ ca O ~ ~ ~ L- ~ ~ 4l -~ ~ u+'i ~ .'~ a, a ~ as ~ ~ ~ ~ a i~• ~ 0 0 • ~~ ~ .~ ~` ~o ~, h ~J rr~~ .V J L ~) W ra ~ V u ,.~~ ' l ~' k".. a r. 9 q~ ,.. " ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ (~ ~ U ~ ~ ~ . > O •V ~ ~ ~ ~ U •- ~ ~ ~ ~ -_ ~ ~ ~ ~ L- ~ ~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ C~ ._ ~ ~ ._ ~ -- - •..~ ~ - ~ _ • - ~ p V ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ L + ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ ~- V ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ W ~ ~ I I I I ~ ~ I ., , iE..: 1 ~•. ^.. ~ ~ ~~:, ... , ~: ~-'_ =: ~ ..... ..... r..,.~ .. ~~ ,~, (/~I r•r G7 W O .~ ~~ ~;t i~4 W x H w ~ o z a 0 F x w c7 0 a ai A 1~ „_ `~* f ~~ l ~~ ~~ ,! ~~ r~,• ~_.• .~ e .~ .~ :~' :. • . . ~ . • . • • s s ` ~4 -trk • r • • s • ~~. ~«~ ~~ • • s • ~ •~ ~ • • • • ~ ~ .J ~ • ~~ • • • ~" I i. • i • ~ • • • A ~ • w • } • • • • • / ~l • • • A ~~ I` ~.~ u rte" ~i~ V ~~ i. O Y C R s H \~ a -~ ~' ~ d, , f r~:-, i~l a i '° t t x ~~ 5 __ f -- ~ j -' 1 ~ ~ .Y ~+ ~ I ~1 ~ ~ I -. _ OAM Ll~A2LJ _- ~ ~"~ ~~ ~. ,~ +. j ,* i ~ ~ { j.. +4f ~ w ~~ ~~ W< J~~ ^~ ~u ~m ~~ i$ C J J i. OC L 3~ 7~ yx ~~ ~~ ~G Y f ~, Z_y +~ x s i j J 1 €.. ~~C U~ Z~L raE .~ s 7~Y ~J~ -~7 Y r '.+ ~_~ r.%~ _~s ~ Y ~jl. '~r `x< V z z z 3 z 3 c~ ~, zLL ~~ ¢~ m w O c. i 5 Y L Y } -m 3 .~ z v. L Ji i xLJ ~J e ;,; Q L 'Y 7 0 ~ K ~/ r i ~ }': i ~ ~'L,- :, M~ .+ r' ^ ^ .lo ^