Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2011/07/06 - Agenda Packet
city of ~ ANCHU (iUCAMUNGA 10500 Civic Center Drive ~ Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730.3801 City Office: (909) 477.2700 AGENDAS REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT BOARD CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETINGS 1•t and 3~ Wednesdays ~ 7:00 P.M. JULY 6, 2011 ORDER OF BUSINESS CLOSED SESSION Tapia Conference Room ................. 5:00 P.M. REGULAR MEETING Council Chambers ........................... 7:00 P.M. MEMBERS MAYOR L. Dennis Michael MAYOR PRO TEM Sam Spagnolo COUNCIL MEMBERS William Alexander Chuck Buquet Diane Williams CITY MANAGER Jack Lam, AICP CITY ATTORNEY James L. Markman CITY CLERK Janice C. Reynolds F INFORMATION FOR THE PUBLIC ~~ ~.~-^. Ni ~ i ~ ( ULAMUNGi1 TO ADDRESS THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY. FIRE BOARD AND CITY COUNCIL The Agency, Fire Board and City Council encourage free expression of all points of view. To allow all persons to speak, given the length of the Agenda, please keep your remarks brief. If others have already expressed your position, you may simply indicate that you agree with a previous speaker. If appropriate, a spokesperson may present the views of your entire group. To encourage all views and promote courtesy to others, the audience should refrain from clapping, booing or shouts of approval or disagreement from the audience. The public may address the Agency, Fire Board or City Council by filling out a speaker card and submitting it to the City Clerk. The speaker cards are located on the wall at the back of the Chambers, at the front desk behind the staff table and at the City Clerk's desk. During "Public Communications," your name will be called to speak on any item listed or not listed on the agenda in the order in which it was received. If as part of your presentation. you would like to display audio or visual material. please see the City Clerk before the meeting commences. If you are present to speak on an "Advertised Public Hearing" item, your name will be called when that item is being discussed. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by the Chair, depending upon the number of individuals desiring to speak. The public communications period will not exceed one hour prior to the commencement of the business portion of the agenda. During this one hour period, all those who wish to speak on a topic contained in the business portion of the agenda will be given priority, and no further speaker cards for these business items (with the exception of public hearing items) will be accepted once the business portion of the agenda commences. Any other public communications which have not concluded during this one hour period may resume after the regular business portion of the agenda has been completed. Any handouts for the Agency, Fire Board or City Council should be given to the City Clerk for distribution. AGENDA BACK-UP MATERIALS Staff reports and back-up materials for agenda items are available for review at the City Clerk's counter, Public Library and on the City's website. A complete copy of the agenda is also available at the desk located behind the staff table during the Council meeting. LIVE BROADCAST Agency, Fire Board and Council meetings are broadcast live on Channel 3 for those with cable television access. Meetings are rebroadcast on the second and fourth Wednesdays of each month at 11:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m. The City has added the option for customers without cable access to view the meetings "on-demand" from their computers. The added feature of "Streaming Video On Demand" is available on the City's website at www.ci.rancho- cucamonga.ca.us/whatsnew.htm for those with Hi-bandwidth (DSUCable Modem) or Low-bandwidth (Dial-up) Internet service. The Agency, Fire Board and City Council meets regularly on the first and third Wednesday of the month at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers located at 10500 Civic Center Drive. Members of the City Council also sit as the Redevelopment Agency and the Fire District Board. Copies of the agendas and minutes can be found at http:llwww.ci.rancho-cucamonga.ca.us If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk's office at (909) 477-2700. Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired. Please turn off all cellular phones and pagers while the meeting is in session. REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, . ,,y ' FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AND CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ~~~ ~ ~ ~. , cucnMUNC,~ JULY 6, 2011 A. 5:00 P.M. -CLOSED SESSION CALL TO ORDER - TAPIA ROOM A1. Roll Call: Mayor Michael Mayor Pro Tem Spagnolo Council Members Alexander, Buquet and Williams CLOSED SESSION CALLED TO ORDER AS THE COUNCIL. B. ANNOUNCEMENT OF CLOSED SESSION ITEM S C. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS ON CLOSED SESSION ITEM S D. CONDUCT OF CLOSED SESSION D1. CONFERENCE WITH PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED AT 8408 ROCHESTER AVENUE; NEGOTIATING PARTIES: KEVIN MCARDLE, COMMUNITY SERVICES DIRECTOR, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA; AND BOBBY BRETT, RANCHO BASEBALL, LLC REGARDING POTENTIAL LEASE EXTENSION -City E. CITY MANAGER ANNOUNCEMENTS F. RECESS CLOSED SESSION TO RECESS TO THE REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING AT 7:00 P.M. IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS AT CITY HALL, LOCATED AT 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA. REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, `~~' ~ FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AND CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ~~:n,,.,~~~~~,~N~,, JULY 6, 2011 2 G. REGULAR MEETING CALL TO ORDER - 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS THE REGULAR MEETINGS OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AND CITY COUNCIL WILL BE CALLED TO ORDER. IT IS THE INTENT TO CONCLUDE THE MEETINGS BY 10:00 P.M., UNLESS EXTENDED BY CONCURRENCE OF THE AGENCY, FIRE BOARD AND COUNCIL. G1. Pledge of Allegiance G2. Roll Call: Mayor Michael Mayor Pro Tem Spagnolo Council Members Alexander, Buquet and Williams H. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS H1. Presentation of Certificates of Recognition to Sponsors of the 9'h Annual Ron Ives Bicycle Rodeo. I. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS This is the time and place for the general public to address the Redevelopment Agency, Fire Protection District and City Council on any item listed or not listed on the agenda. State law prohibits the Agency, Fire Board, or City Council from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Agency, Fire Board, or City Council may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by the Chair, depending upon the number of individuals desiring to speak. All communications are to be addressed directly to the Agency, Fire Board or City Council, not to the members of the audience. This is a professional business meeting and courtesy and decorum are expected. Please refrain from any debate between audience and speaker, making loud noises, or engaging in any activity which might be disruptive to the decorum of the meeting. The public communications period will not exceed one hour prior to the commencement of the business portion of the agenda. During this one hour period, all those who wish to speak on a topic contained in the business portion of the agenda will be given priority, and no further speaker cards for these business items (with the exception of public hearing items) will be accepted once the business portion of the agenda commences. Any other public communications which have not concluded during this one hour period may resume after the regular business portion of the agenda has been completed. REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AND CITY COUNCIL AGENDA JULY 6, 2011 3 CONSENT CALENDARS: The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non-controversial. They will be acted upon by the Agency/Board/City Council at one time without discussion. Any item may be removed by an Agency/Board/Council Member for discussion. .I. CONSENT CALENDAR -REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY J1. Approval of Minutes: June 9, 2011 (Special Meeting -Budget) June 15, 2011 (Regular Meeting) J2. Approval of Check Register dated June 8 through June 28, 2011, for the total amount of ~ $1,147,818.70. J3. Approval of adoption of a Resolution to authorize the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment 2 Agency Executive Director or his designee to submit Assessment Ballots on behalf of the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency in the proceedings to form Landscape Maintenance District No. 2-R. RESOLUTION NO. RA 11-014 4 A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY (RDA), RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE RDA EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OR HIS DESIGNEE TO SUBMIT ASSESSMENT BALLOTS ON BEHALF OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY IN THE PROCEEDINGS TO FORM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2-R AND PROVIDING DIRECTION ON THE SUBMISSION OF SAID ASSESSMENT BALLOTS J4. Approval to accept the Pacific Electric Trail Phase 4 -Grove Avenue to Amethyst Avenue, 6 Contract No. 09-014 as complete, retain the Faithful Performance Bond as a Guarantee Bond, release the Labor and Material Bond, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and approve the final contract amount of $2,601,565.21. RESOLUTION NO. RA 11-015 9 A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PACIFIC ELECTRIC TRAIL PHASE 4 - GROVE AVENUE TO AMETHYST AVENUE, CONTRACT NO. 09-014 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AND CITY COUNCIL AGENDA JULY 6, 2011 4 K. CONSENT CALENDAR -FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT K1. Approval of Minutes: June 9, 2011 (Special Meeting -Budget) June 15, 2011 (Regular Meeting) K2. Approval of Check Register dated June 8 through June 28, 2011, for the total amount of 10 $400,157.03. K3. Approval of adoption of a Resolution to authorize the Appointing Authority or his designee to submit an Assessment Ballot on behalf of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District in 15 the proceedings to form Landscape Maintenance District No. 2-R. RESOLUTION NO. FD 11-027 17 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE APPOINTING AUTHORITY OR HIS DESIGNEE TO SUBMIT AN ASSESSMENT BALLOT ON BEHALF OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT N THE PROCEEDINGS TO FORM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2-R AND PROVIDING DIRECTION ON THE SUBMISSION OF SAID ASSESSMENT BALLOT L. CONSENT CALENDAR -CITY COUNCIL L1. Approval of Minutes: June 09, 2011 (Special Meeting -Budget) June 15, 2011 (Regular Meeting) June 27, 2011 (Special Meeting -City Manager Appointment) L2. Approval of Check Register dated June 8 through June 28, 2011, and payroll ending June 28, 2011, for the total amount of $3,545,872.95. 19 L3. Approval of a Resolution adopting the 2011 San Bernardino County Non-Motorized Transportation Plan for the City of Rancho Cucamonga as an update to the previously 61 adopted 2008 Non-Motorized Transportation Plan, in order to qualify for certain grant funds, such as the Bicycle Transportation Account (BTA) Program. RESOLUTION NO. 11-094 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO 73 CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY NON-MOTORIZED TRANSPORTATION PLAN FOR THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA L4. Approval to accept and allocate $35,187 grant awarded by the California Department of 74 Forestry and Fire Protection ("CAL FIRE") into General Fund Revenue Account 1001000- 4740 and appropriate $35,187 into various object codes as determined by staff into Expenditure Account 1001316 (Street and Park Maintenance) for the purpose of planting trees along the Pacific Electric Trail. ~i'~r"~'1~„(i!~nHUNCn REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AND CITY COUNCIL AGENDA JULY 6, 2011 5 L5. Approval of a recommendation from the Park and Recreation Commission regarding the 76 proposed fee for the use of Billiards Cove (pool room) at the James L. Brulte Senior Center. L6. Approval to appropriate funds into the Capital Reserve Fund -Capital Supplies 025 78 Account 1025001-5207 in the amount of $30,249 and authorize the purchase of six (6) bleachers manufactured by PW Athletic Manufacturing Co. through the PlayWell Group utilizing the Houston Galveston Area Council (HGAC) Buy Program Contract PR 11-10 to replace the current donated bleachers at Etiwanda Creek Park in the amount of $30,075 and authorize an expenditure of a 2% installation cost contingency in the amount of $174. L7. Approval to issue a solar incentive rebate to Solarmax Technology, Inc. for installation of a 80 solar photovoltaic system at Children's Dentistry of the Inland Empire in the amount of $68,130.26, to be funded from Acct. No. 1706303-5209 (Municipal Utility Public Benefit Fund). L8. Approval of request of consideration for the City to acquire off-site property for public street 83 rights-of-way in conjunction with the development of Tentative Tract 18806, located on the north side of Base Line Road east of Etiwanda Avenue, submitted by LVD Rancho Cucamonga, LLC; any and all costs will be borne by the Developer. L9. Approval to execute an Enterprise License Agreement (ELA) for Geographic Information 96 Systems (GIS) Software between Environmental System Research Institute (ESRI) (CO 11-086) and the City of Rancho Cucamonga in the total amount of $207,000 for a three (3) year term payable in three (3) annual installments, and authorization to appropriate $74,000 into Account Number 1373701-5152 for the first year's payment. L10. Approval of an annual citywide agreement with Independent Stationers, to provide printer toner cartridges and miscellaneous office supplies, utilizing 99 U.S. Communities Master Agreement Number MA-IS-1 140050, and with Office Max to provide copy and printer paper, utilizing the America Saves Contract Number 003209; funded by various citywide department account numbers in accordance with the adopted budget for Fiscal Year 2011/2012, and authorize continued utilization of said contracts in accordance with their specified expiration dates. L11. Approval of Resolutions initiating proceedings to levy annual assessments, preliminarily 101 approve the annual levy reports, declaring the City Council's intention to levy annual assessments within Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 for Fiscal Year 2011/12 and setting the time and place for a public hearing thereon. NO INCREASE OF ASSESSMENT RATE FOR FY 2011/12 IS PROPOSED. RESOLUTION NO. 11-095 103 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO PROVIDE FOR THE ANNUAL LEVY AND COLLECTION OF ASSESSMENTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2011/2012 IN STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 AND 8, INCLUSIVE, AND SETTING A TIME AND PLACE FOR A PUBLIC HEARING THEREON REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AND CITY COUNCIL AGENDA JULY 6, 2011 6 RESOLUTION NO. 11-096 I 107 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE PREPARATION OF ANNUAL LEVY REPORTS PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE ASSESSMENT LAW FOR PROCEEDINGS FOR THE ANNUAL ASSESSMENT LEVY WITHIN STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 AND 8, INCLUSIVE, FOR FISCAL YEAR 2011 /12 RESOLUTION NO. 11-097 ~ 109 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, PRELIMINARILY APPROVING THE ANNUAL LEVY REPORTS FOR THE ANNUAL LEVY OF ASSESSMENTS WITHIN STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 AND 8, INCLUSIVE, FOR FISCAL YEAR 2011 /12 L12. Approval of Resolutions initiating proceedings to levy annual assessments, preliminarily 111 approve the annual levy reports, declaring the City Council's intention to levy annual assessments within Landscape Maintenance District Nos. 1, 3A, 36, 4-R, 5, 6-R, 7, 8, 9 and 10 for Fiscal Year 2011/12 and setting the time and place for a public hearing thereon. NO INCREASE OF ASSESSMENT RATE FOR FY 2011/12 IS PROPOSED. RESOLUTION NO. 11-098 ~ 113 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO PROVIDE FOR THE ANNUAL LEVY AND COLLECTION OF ASSESSMENTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2011/2012 IN LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1, 3A, 3B, 4-R, 5, 6-R, 7, 8, 9 AND 10, INCLUSIVE, AND SETTING A TIME AND PLACE FOR A PUBLIC HEARING THEREON 118 RESOLUTION NO. 11-099 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE PREPARATION OF ANNUAL LEVY REPORTS PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE ASSESSMENT LAW FOR PROCEEDINGS FOR THE ANNUAL ASSESSMENT LEVY WITHIN LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1, 3A, 3B, 4-R, 5, 6-R, 7, 8, 9 AND 10, INCLUSIVE, FOR FISCAL YEAR 2011 /12 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AND CITY COUNCIL AGENDA JULY 6, 2011 7 RESOLUTION NO. 11-100 120 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, PRELIMINARILY APPROVING THE ANNUAL LEVY REPORTS FOR THE ANNUAL LEVY OF ASSESSMENTS WITHIN LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 3A, 3B, 4-R, 5, 6-R, 7, 8, 9 AND 10, INCLUSIVE, FOR FISCAL YEAR 2011 /12 L13. Approval of Resolutions initiating proceedings to levy annual assessments, preliminarily 122 approve the annual levy reports, declaring the City Council's intention to levy annual assessments within Park and Recreation Improvement District No. PD-85 for Fiscal Year 2011/12 and setting the time and place for a public hearing thereon. NO INCREASE OF ASSESSMENT RATE FOR FY 2011/12 IS PROPOSED. 124 RESOLUTION NO. 11-101 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO PROVIDE FOR THE ANNUAL LEVY AND COLLECTION OF ASSESSMENTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2011/2012 IN PARK AND RECREATION IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. PD-85 AND SETTING A TIME AND PLACE FOR A PUBLIC HEARING THEREON RESOLUTION NO. 11-102 128 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE PREPARATION OF ANNUAL LEVY REPORT PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE ASSESSMENT LAW FOR PROCEEDINGS FOR THE ANNUAL ASSESSMENT LEVY WITHIN PARK AND RECREATION IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. PD-85 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2011/12 RESOLUTION NO. 11-103 I 130 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, PRELIMINARILY APPROVING THE ANNUAL LEVY REPORT FOR THE ANNUAL LEVY OF ASSESSMENTS WITHIN PARK AND RECREATION IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. PD-85 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2011/12 L14. Approval of adoption of a Resolution to authorize the City Manager or his designee to 132 submit Assessment Ballots on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga in the proceedings to form Landscape Maintenance District No. 2-R. ~: . ~~ n`i ~i ~ ~ ~ ~-UUAMUNG 1 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AND CITY COUNCIL AGENDA JULY 6, 2011 8 RESOLUTION NO. 11-104 134 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER OR HIS DESIGNEE TO SUBMIT ASSESSMENT BALLOTS ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA IN THE PROCEEDINGS TO FORM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2-R AND PROVIDING DIRECTION ON THE SUBMISSION OF SAID ASSESSMENT BALLOTS L15. Approval of Map, Improvement Agreement, Improvement Securities, Monumentation Cash 136 Deposit and ordering the annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 10 and Street Light Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 7 for Tract Map 18032, located on the west side of Day Creek Boulevard, south of Vintage Drive, submitted by Meritage Homes of California, Inc. RESOLUTION NO. 11-105 I 138 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING FINAL MAP, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES AND MONUMENTATION CASH DEPOSIT FOR TRACT 18032 RESOLUTION NO. 11-106 139 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 10 (RANCHO ETIWANDA) FOR TRACT 18032 RESOLUTION NO. 11-107 144 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 7 (NORTH ETIWANDA) FOR TRACT 18032 RESOLUTION NO. 11-108 ~ 149 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (ARTERIAL STREETS) FOR TRACT 18032 L16. Approval of a Professional Services Agreement in the amount of $132,000 to Applied Metering Technologies, Inc. (CO 11-087) for installation, configuration and meter testing 154 services within the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility Service Area for FY 2011/12, to be funded from 1705303-5309 Municipal Utility Fund. REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AND CITY COUNCIL AGENDA JULY 6, 2011 9 L17. Approval of a Professional Services Agreement in the amount of $131,000 to Butsko Utility 155 Design, Inc. (CO 11-088) for technical electrical engineering support within the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility Service Area for FY 2011/12, to be funded from 1705303- 5309 Municipal Utility Fund. L18. Approval of a Professional Services Agreement in the amount of $165,000.00 to 156 International Line Builders, Inc. (CO 11-089), for operation and maintenance of the Arbors Substation and the Municipal Utilities Electrical Distribution System within the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility Service Area for FY 2011/12, to be funded from 1705303- 5309 Municipal Utility Fund. L19. Approval of recommendation to Quitclaim Vehicular Access Rights to and egress from the 157 southerly line of Lot 1 of Tract 18710 abutting Church Street, east of Milliken Avenue. RESOLUTION NO. 11-109 158 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, FINDING THAT SAID VEHICULAR ACCESS RIGHTS MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED HEREIN TO BE UNNECESSARY AND RESTRICTIVE, AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE THAT CERTAIN DEED, COPY OF WHICH IS ATTACHED HERETO, AND TO CAUSE THE SAME TO BE RECORDED L20. Approval to accept the Pacific Electric Trail Phase 4 -Grove Avenue to Amethyst Avenue, 159 Contract No. 09-262 as complete, retain the Faithful Performance Bond as a Guarantee Bond, release the Labor and Material Bond, and authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and approve the final contract amount of $2,601,565.21. RESOLUTION NO. 11-110 162 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PACIFIC ELECTRIC TRAIL PHASE 4 - GROVE AVENUE TO AMETHYST AVENUE, CONTRACT NO. 09-262 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK L21. Approval to release the Maintenance Guarantee cash deposit for DRC2005-00327, located 163 at 8619 Baker Avenue, submitted by Chinese Christian Family Church, Inland Valley. L22. Approval to release the Maintenance Guarantee Cash Deposit for Tract 17487 and 17840, 167 located on the south side of Church Street, east of Day Creek Boulevard, submitted by Shea Homes, LP. L23. Approval to accept Improvements, release the Faithful Performance Letter of Credit, accept a Maintenance Cash Deposit and file a Notice of Completion for improvements for 170 DRC2005-00831, located at the northeast corner of Vineyard Avenue and San Bernardino Road, submitted by Mapleton International Financial, L.P. REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AND CITY COUNCIL AGENDA JULY 6, 2011 10 RESOLUTION NO. 11-111 172 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR DRC2005-00831 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK M. CONSENT ORDINANCES The following Ordinances have had public hearings at the time of first reading. Second readings are expected to be routine and non-controversial. The Agency, Fire Board, or Council will act upon them at one time without discussion. The City Clerk will read the title. Any item can be removed for discussion by an Agency Member, Board Member, or Council Member. M1. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND MUNICIPAL CODE AMENDMENT DRC2008- 173 00158 -CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A proposed amendment to the Historic Preservation Ordinance deleting Chapter 2.24, Title 2 of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code and replacing it in its entirety. Staff has prepared a Negative Declaration of environmental impact for consideration. ORDINANCE NO. 848 (second reading) 174 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING MUNICIPAL CODE AMENDMENT DRC2008-00158, A REQUEST TO DELETE CHAPTER 2.24, TITLE 2 OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE AND REPLACE IT IN ITS ENTIRETY, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF N. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT The following items have been advertised and/or posted as public hearings as required by law. The Chair will open the meeting to receive public testimony. N1. APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE FIRE DISTRICT'S GENERAL FUND 194 FINAL BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 2011/12 IN THE AMOUNT OF $18,771,000. RESOLUTION NO. FD 11-028 196 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, FIXING A FINAL BUDGET FOR THE FISCAL YEAR JULY 1, 2011 THROUGH JUNE 30, 2012 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AND CITY COUNCIL AGENDA JULY 6, 2011 11 O. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS CITY COUNCIL The following items have been advertised and/or posted as public hearings as required by law. The Mayor will open the meeting to receive public testimony. 01. CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF 198 RANCHO CUCAMONGA AMENDING ELECTRIC RATES. FEES AND CHARGES PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS AND AUTHORITY OF CHAPTER 3.46 OF TITLE 3 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE 199 RESOLUTION NO. 11-112 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING ELECTRIC RATES, FEES AND CHARGES PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS AND AUTHORITY OF CHAPTER 3.46 OF TITLE 3 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE 02. CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF 230 RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING ASELF-HAUL PERMIT FEE PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS AND AUTHORITY OF CHAPTER 8.17 AND CHAPTER 8.19 OF TITLE 8 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE RESOLUTION NO. 11-113 231 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING ASELF-HAUL PERMIT FEE PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS AND AUTHORITY OF CHAPTER 8.17 AND CHAPTER 8.19 OF TITLE 8 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE P. CITY MANAGERS STAFF REPORTS -FIRE PROTECTION The following items have no legal publication or posting requirements. 232 P1. APPROVAL TO SET ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX LEVY FOR MELLO-RODS COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1 (CFD NO. 85-1) FOR FISCAL YEAR 2011/12 RESOLUTION NO. FD 11-029 234 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING THE ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2011 /12 ,, ,~ ti, ~A~f~"It~~ ~~1CAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AND CITY COUNCIL AGENDA JULY 6, 2011 12 P2. APPROVAL TO SET ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX LEVY FOR MELLO-ROOS COMMUNITY 244 FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-1 (CFD NO. 88-1) FOR FISCAL YEAR 2011/12 RESOLUTION NO. FD 11-030 246 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING THE ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-1 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2011 /12 Q. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS -CITY COUNCIL The following items have no legal publication or posting requirements. Q1. REVIEW AND UPDATE OF CALIFORNIA CITIZENS REDISTRICTING COMMISSION'S 2 DRAFT MAPS AND APPROVAL FOR CITY TO URGE THE COMMISSION TO REVISE 56 ASSEMBLY DISTRICT MAP SBCUCA AND SENATE DISTRICT MAP SBBAN TO INCLUDE THE ENTIRE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA R. COUNCIL BUSINESS The following items have been requested by the City Council for discussion. R1. COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS (Comments to be limited to three minutes per Council Member.) R2. LEGISLATIVE AND REGIONAL UPDATES (Oral) --- R3. DESIGNATION OF A VOTING REPRESENTATIVE AND ALTERNATES FOR THE 2011 266 LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES ANNUAL MEETING R4. LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT (LMD) 2-R ANALYSIS AND CLARIFICATION 271 R5. APPROVAL OF CITY MANAGER CONTRACT 275 S. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING T. ADJOURNMENT I, Debra L. McKay, Assistant City Clerk/Records Manager, of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on June 30, 2011, seventy-two (72) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive. June 9, 2011 RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, FIRE DISTRICT AND CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING MINUTES A. CALL TO ORDER - 5:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS A special meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency, Fire Protection District, and City Council convened in the Council Chambers of the Civic Center located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Chairman/PresidenUMayor L. Dennis Michael called the meeting to order at 5:00 p.m. Present were Agency Members/Board MemberslCouncil Members: Bill Alexander, Chuck Buquet, Diane Williams, Vice ChairmanlVice PresidenUMayor Pro Tem Sam Spagnolo and Chairman/PresidenUMayor L. Dennis Michael. Also present were: Jack Lam, City Manager; James Markman, City Attorney; John Gillison, Assistant City Manager; Linda Daniels, Deputy City Manager; Trang Huynh, Building and Safety Services Director; Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director; Bill Wittkopf, Public Works Director; Robert Karatsu, Library Director; Joe Pulcinella, Animal Care and Services Director; Police Chief Joe Cusimano; Fire Chief Mike Bell; Debra McKay, Records Manager/Assistant City Clerk and Kathy Scott, Assistant City Clerk. B. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS There were no persons present who wished to speak. CONSENT CALENDARS: The following items are expected to be routine and non-controversial. They will be acted upon by the Agency/Board/City Council at one time without discussion. Any item may be removed by an Agency/Board/Council Member for discussion. C. CONSENT CALENDAR -REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY C1. Approval of a resolution in accordance with Health and Safety Code Section 33445 which authorizes the Redevelopment Agency to expend funds for land and public improvements that are publicly owned and located inside or contiguous to the Project Area. RESOLUTION NO. RA 11-011 A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REGARDING PROJECTS BENEFITING THE RANCHO REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AND MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS IN REGARD Redevelopment Agency, Fire Protection District, City Council Special Meeting Minutes June 9, 2011 -Page 1 of 7 C2. Approval of a resolution in accordance with Health and Safety Code Section 33445.1 which authorizes the Redevelopment Agency to expend funds for land and public improvements that are publicly owned and located outside and not contiguous to the Project Area but are located within the community. RESOLUTION NO. RA 11-012 A RESOLUTION OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REGARDING PROJECTS BENEFITING THE RANCHO REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AND MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS IN REGARD MOTION: Moved by Spagnolo, seconded by Williams, to approve the staff recommendations in the staff reports. Motion carried 5-0. D. CONSENT CALENDAR -FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT D1. Approval of a resolution to reaffirm the level of fiscal reserves for the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District. RESOLUTION NO. FD 11-015 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, REAFFIRMING THE LEVEL OF FISCAL RESERVES FOR THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT D2. Approval of a resolution adopting Fiscal Year 2011/2012 Salary Schedules for Fire District Job Classifications. RESOLUTION NO. FD 11-016 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE SALARY SCHEDULES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2011/2012 D3. Consideration of adoption of amended Fiscal Year 2010/2011 General Fund's Article XIIIB Appropriations Limit. RESOLUTION NO. FD 11-017 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING AN AMENDED GENERAL FUND APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2010111 PURSUANT TO ARTICLE XIIIB OF THE CALIFORNIA CONSTITUTION D4. Adoption of amended Fiscal Year 2010/2011 Article XIIIB Appropriations Limit for Community Facilities District (CFD) No. 85-1. Redevelopment Agency, Fire Protection District, City Council Special Meeting Minutes June 9, 2011 -Page 2 of 7 RESOLUTION NO. FD 11-018 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING AN AMENDED APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT FOR MELLO-ROOS COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 85- 1 FISCAL YEAR 2010/11 PURSUANT TO ARTICLE XIIIB OF THE CALIFORNIA CONSTITUTION D5. Adoption of Amended Fiscal Year 2010/2011 Article XIIIB Appropriations Limit for Community Facilities District (CFD) No. 88-1. RESOLUTION NO. FD 11-019 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING AN AMENDED APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT FOR MELLO-RODS COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88- 1 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2010/11 PURSUANT TO ARTICLE XIIIB OF THE CALIFORNIA CONSTITUTION MOTION: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Spagnolo, to approve the staff recommendations in the staff reports. Motion carried 5-0. E. CONSENT CALENDAR -CITY COUNCIL E1. Approval of a resolution to reaffirm the level of fiscal reserves for the City of Rancho Cucamonga. RESOLUTION NO. 11-076 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REAFFIRMING THE LEVEL OF FISCAL RESERVES FOR THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA E2. Approval of a resolution in accordance with Health and Safety Code Section 33445 which authorizes the Redevelopment Agency to expend funds for land and public improvements that are publicly owned and located inside or contiguous to the Project Area. RESOLUTION NO. 11-077 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REGARDING PROJECTS BENEFITING THE RANCHO REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AND MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS IN REGARD E3. Approval of a resolution in accordance with Health and Safety Code Section 33445.1 which authorizes the Redevelopment Agency to expend funds for land and public improvements that are publicly owned and located outside and not contiguous to the Project Area but are located within the community. RESOLUTION NO. 11-078 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REGARDING PROJECTS BENEFITING THE RANCHO REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AND MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS IN REGARD Redevelopment Agency, Fire Protection District, City Council Special Meeting Minutes June 9, 2011 -Page 3 of 7 E4. Approval of a resolution adopting Fiscal Year 201112012 salary schedules for City job classifications. RESOLUTION NO. 11-079 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE SALARY SCHEDULES FOR FISCAL YEAR 201112012, INCLUDING CITY COUNCIL BENEFITS E5. Approval of corrections to amended Fiscal Year 2 01 012 0 1 1 Appropriations. E8. Consideration of adoption of Fiscal Year 2010/2011 amended Article XIIIB Appropriations Limit. RESOLUTION NO. 11-080 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ESTABLISHING AN AMENDED APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT PURSUANT TO ARTICLE XIIIB OF THE CALIFORNIA STATE CONSTITUTION FOR FISCAL YEAR 2010/2011 E7. Authorization for the prefunding of the City of Rancho Cucamonga PARS Plan's unfunded Actuarial Accrued Liability (UAAL) as determined in the June 30, 2010 actuarial valuation from Account Number 1025001-5040 and authorization to fully fund the City's annual required contribution (ARC) for Fiscal Year 2010/2011. E8. Approval of Capital Improvement Program (CIP) for Fiscal Year 2011/12. MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by Alexander, to approve the staff recommendations in the staff reports. Motion carried 5-0. F. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY The following items have no legal publication or posting requirements. F1. Consideration to adopt the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency's annual budget for Fiscal Year 2011 /2012. RESOLUTION NO. RA 11-013 A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, ADOPTING THE AGENCY'S FISCAL YEAR 2 01 112 0 1 2 BUDGET Jack Lam, Executive Director, presented the staff report. In response to Agency Member Alexander, Mr. Lam indicated that the new Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) Standards do not affect the budget. MOTION: Moved by Alexander, seconded by Spagnolo, to adopt Resolution No. RA 11-013. Motion carried 5-0. G. CITY MANAGERS STAFF REPORTS FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Redevelopment Agency, Fire Protection District, City Council Special Meeting Minutes June 9, 2011 -Page 4 of 7 The following items have no legal publication or posting requirements. G1. Consideration to adopt the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District General Fund preliminary budget in the amount of $18,771,000 and appropriations limit in the amount of $20,834,274 for Fiscal Year 2011/2012 and set final approval of final budget for July 6, 2011. RESOLUTION NO. FD 11-020 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING A GENERAL FUND APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2011/2012 PURSUANT TO ARTICLE XIIIB OF THE CALIFORNIA CONSTITUTION Jack Lam, City Manager, presented the staff report In response to Board Member Buquet, Mr. Lam addressed the funding sources of the Fire Protection District, indicating that property tax is the primary revenue source. In response to Chair Michael, Mr. Lam confirmed that there was no use of reserves in any of the budgets. MOTION: Moved by Alexander, seconded by Spagnolo, to adopt Resolution No. FD 11-020 and set final budget approval for July 6, 2011. Motion carried 5-0. G2. Consideration of approval of resolutions adopting a budget in the amount of $6,410,270 and approving the appropriations limit in the amount of $10,867,114 for Fiscal Year 2011/12 in Community Facilities District (CFD) No. 85-1. RESOLUTION NO. FD 11-021 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AND ADOPTING A BUDGET FOR MELLO-ROOS COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2011/12 RESOLUTION NO. FD 11-022 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING AN APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT FOR MELLO-ROOS COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2011/12 PURSUANT TO ARTICLE XIIIB OF THE CALIFORNIA CONSTITUTION Jack Lam, City Manager, presented the staff report. MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by Spagnolo, to adopt Resolution Nos. FD 11-021 and FD 11-022. Motion carried 5-0. G3. Consideration of adoption of Resolutions adopting a budget in the amount of $1,828,020 and approving the Appropriations Limit in the amount of $2,388,723 for Fiscal Year 2011/12 in Community Facilities District (CFD) No. 88-1. RESOLUTION NO. FD 11-023 Redevelopment Agency, Fire Protection District, City Council Special Meeting Minutes June 9, 2011 -Page 5 of 7 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AND ADOPTING A BUDGET FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-1 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2011/12 RESOLUTION NO. FD 11-024 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING AN APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-1 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2011/12 PURSUANT TO ARTICLE XIIIB OF THE CALIFORNIA CONSTITUTION Jack Lam, City Manager, presented the staff report. MOTION: Moved by Alexander, seconded by Buquet, to adopt Resolution Nos. FD 11-023 and FD 11-024. Motion carried 5-0. H. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS CITY COUNCIL The following items have no legal publication or posting requirements. H1. Consideration of adoption of Fiscal Year 2011/2012 budget and Article XIIIB Appropriations Limit. RESOLUTION NO. 11-081 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE CITY'S FISCAL YEAR 2011/2012 BUDGET RESOLUTION NO. 11-082 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING AN APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT PURSUANT TO ARTICLE XIIIB OF THE CALIFORNIA STATE CONSTITUTION FOR FISCAL YEAR 2011/2012 Jack Lam, City Manager, presented the staff report Council Member Buquet noted the pending reorganizationlsuccession planning to be done by all Departments. As a result of this planning, each Department would identify their optimal staffing levels. The 76 vacant positions due to attrition management efforts would not automatically be refilled. Also, Council Member Buquet commended the efforts of all of the labor groups to assist the City in preparing a balanced budget. Mayor Michael appreciated the soft landing achieved in the upcoming Fiscal Year budget and truly appreciated the hard work by all Departments. MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by Spagnolo, to adopt Resolution Nos. 11-081 and 11-082. Motion carried 5-0. Redevelopment Agency, Fire Protection District, City Council Special Meeting Minutes June 9, 2011 -Page 6 of 7 I. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS ON CLOSED SESSION ITEM S No one was present to comment on the closed session item. J. RECESS The meeting recessed at 5:21 to closed session. K. CALL TO ORDER The Rancho Cucamonga City Council held a closed session on Thursday, June 9, 2011, in the De Anza Room of the Civic Center located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. The meeting was called to order at 5:25 p.m. by Mayor L. Dennis Michael. Present were Council Members: Bill Alexander, Chuck Buquet, Diane Williams, Mayor Pro Tem Sam Spagnolo and Mayor L. Dennis Michael. Also present were: Jack Lam, City Manager; John Gillison, Assistant City Manager; and James Markman, City Attorney. L. ANNOUNCEMENT OF CLOSED SESSION ITEM Mayor L. Dennis Michael announced the closed session item: M1. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.9 REGARDING EXISTING LITIGATION, NELSON V. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, SUPERIOR COURT COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, RANCHO CUCAMONGA DISTRICT, CASE NO. CIVRS913680 -CITY M. CONDUCT OF CLOSED SESSION Closed session began at 5:25 p.m. N. CITY MANAGER ANNOUNCEMENTS No announcements were made. O. ADJOURNMENT Mayor Michael adjourned the closed session at 5:40 p.m. with no action taken. Respectfully submitted, Debra L. McKay, MMC Assistant City Clerk/Records Manager Approved: ***** Redevelopment Agency, Fire Protection District, City Council Special Meeting Minutes June 9, 2011 -Page 7 of 7 June 15, 2011 RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, FIRE DISTRICT AND CITY COUNCIL CLOSED SESSION MINUTES A. CALL TO ORDER The Rancho Cucamonga City Council held a closed session on Wednesday, June 15, 2011, in the Tapia Room of the Civic Center located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. The meeting was called to order at 5:00 p.m. by Mayor L. Dennis Michael. Present were Agency/Council Members: Bill Alexander, Chuck Buquet, Diane Williams, Mayor Pro Tem Sam Spagnolo and Mayor L. Dennis Michael. Also present were: Jack Lam, City Manager; John Gillison, Assistant City Manager and James Markman, City Attorney. B. ANNOUNCEMENT OF CLOSED SESSION ITEM S Mayor L. Dennis Michael announced the closed session items: D1. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL--ANTICIPATED LITIGATION PURSUANT GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.9(C)- ONE POTENTIAL CASE REGARDING PARTICIPATION IN SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY'S FILING OF INITIAL TEST CLAIM WITH THE COMMISSION ON STATE MANDATES REGARDING PROVISIONS OF SANTA ANA REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD ORDER NO. R8-2010-0036 ("2010 Santa Ana MS4 Permit"), AND TO RETAIN BURHENN & GEST LLP FOR INITIAL TEST CLAIM FILING -City D2. CLOSED SESSION PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54957-PUBLIC EMPLOYEE APPOINTMENT. TITLE: CITY MANAGER C. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS ON CLOSED SESSION ITEM S No one was present to comment on the closed session item. D. CONDUCT OF CLOSED SESSION Closed session began at 5:00 p.m. E. CITY MANAGER ANNOUNCEMENTS No announcements were made. F. RECESS Redevelopment Agency, Fire Protection District, City Council Minutes June 15, 2011 -Page 1 of 12 The closed session recessed at 6:30 p.m. At 7:00 p.m., Jim Markman, City Attorney, announced that the City Council had voted in closed session to appoint John Gillison as the next City Manager, subject to the negotiation of a suitable contract, authorized the City Attorney to negotiate the contract and report back to the full Council. (M/S Buquet/Williams; 4-1, Council Member Alexander voting no). G. REGULAR MEETING CALL TO ORDER - 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS The meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency, Fire Protection District, and City Council reconvened in the Council Chambers of the Civic Center located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Chairman/President/Mayor L. Dennis Michael called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. Present were Agency MemberslBoard Members/Council Members: Bill Alexander, Chuck Buquet, Diane Williams, Vice ChairmanA/ice PresidenUMayor Pro Tem Sam Spagnolo and Chairman/PresidenUMayor L. Dennis Michael. Also present were: Jack Lam, City Manager; James Markman, City Attorney; John Gillison, Assistant City Manager; Linda Daniels, Deputy City Manager; Trang Huynh, Building and Safety Services Director; Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director; Mark Steuer, Director of Engineering Services; Bill Wittkopf, Public Works Director; Robert Karatsu, Library Director; Fire Chief Mike Bell; Police Chief Joe Cusimano; Jim Frost, City Treasurer; Janice Reynolds, City Clerk; Debra McKay, Records ManagerlAssistant City Clerk and Kathy Scott, Assistant City Clerk. H. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS H1. Update on plans for development of Freedom Courtyard at Central Park and Presentation by VFW Post 8680. Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director, presented an update on the Freedom Courtyard plans for development. H2. Presentation by the Park & Recreation Commission on how "Parks Make Life Better' and a declaration by the City Council proclaiming July is Parks and Recreation Month - "Parks Make Life Better!" Mayor Michael presented a proclamation to Janet Ryerson, Chair of the Park and Recreation Commission declaring July, 2011 as "Parks Make Life Better" month. H3. Presentation of a Proclamation to Trudy Coleman and Juneteenth America, Inc., regarding "California Juneteenth National Freedom Day." Mayor Michael presented a proclamation to Juneteenth America, Inc., declaring "California Juneteenth National Freedom Day." I. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS 11. Rebecca Davies congratulated Jack Lam, City Manager, on his pending retirement. 12. Jerie Lee invited the Council and the audience to the Senior Advisory Pancake breakfast, to be held at Applebee's on June 25, 2011 from 8:00 to 10:00 a.m. Redevelopment Agency, Fire Protection District, City Council Minutes June 15, 2011 -Page 2 of 12 13. Jose Calero expressed a concern with a neighbor's current and past excessive use of City resources to punish, control or harass himself and his neighbors. The neighbor's current concern is Mr. Calero has too many UPS and Fed Ex deliveries to his home. 14. Jim Frost gave a general overview of the past actions of the City Council, both collectively and individually. He addressed Council philosophy and noted the need for the City Council members to express their opinions to the community. Also, Mr. Frost addressed Item N1 (Historic Preservation Ordinance) and indicated that penalties should be added to prevent demolition by neglect. 15. John Lyons noted the guidance that Jack Lam has provided over the years and indicated that he has done an outstanding job. 16. Ed Dietl addressed Item N1 (Historic Preservation Ordinance) and indicated that penalties should be added to prevent demolition by neglect. 17. Luana Hernandez spoke about the importance of preserving historical structures and addressed Item N1 (Historic Preservation Ordinance). She noted that penalties should be added to prevent demolition by neglect. 18. Bill Hanlon noted that he attended a Council meeting in Fontana whereby the Council members interacted with the public. He was pleased with the retirement of Jack Lam due to concerns with salary and pension expenses. Mr. Hanlon was concerned with the promotion of the Assistant City Manager and the decision not to pursue a recruitment process. Ig. Jim Moffatt noted the positive presentation made tonight regarding the park system and noted that it is contrary to the actions last year to remove people from parks. He urged the Mayor to lead the community and interact with the public. 110. Gwyn Frost inquired if Item N1 (Historic Preservation Ordinance) would have a public hearing. As it is scheduled for a public hearing, she indicated that she would speak at that time. 111.Hilda Phillips suggested that Loma Linda Hospital be contacted and that arrangements be made for veterans to attend City summer events. CONSENT CALENDARS: The following items are expected to be routine and non-controversial. They will be acted upon by the Agency/Board/City Council at one time without discussion. Any item may be removed by an Agency/Board/Council Member for discussion. J. CONSENT CALENDAR -REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY J1. Approval of Minutes: May 26, 2011 (Special Meeting -Proposed Budgets FY 2011/12) June 1, 2011 (Regular Meeting) J2. Approval of Check Register dated May 25 through June 7, 2011, for the total amount of $2, 024,170.56. J3. Approve to receive and file current Investment Schedule as of May 31, 2011. Redevelopment Agency, Fire Protection District, City Council Minutes June 15, 2011 -Page 3 of 12 J4. Approval to award the purchase of one (1) 2012 Chevrolet Suburban Battalion Vehicle with equipment, from Emergency Vehicle Group of Anaheim, CA, in the amount of $89,714.56 per RFB#1 011 1-0 1 9, from Account No. 2505801-5604 (Fire Protection-RDA Fund, Capital Outlay- Vehicles). J5. Approval to award the purchase of three (3) 2012 Dodge Ram 2500 Crew Cab pick-up trucks with equipment, from McPeek's Dodge of Anaheim, CA, in the amount of $162,685.31, and one (1) 2012 Chevrolet Silverado pick-up truck with equipment from Emergency Vehicle Group of Anaheim, CA, in the amount of $63,237.41, per RFB#10/11-014, from Account No. 2505801-5604 (Fire Protection-RDA Fund, Capital Outlay-Vehicles)p J6. Approval to accept the bids received and award and authorize the execution of the contract in the amount of $5,216,750.00, to the lowest responsive bidder, Sully-Miller Contracting Company (RA 11-012), and authorize the expenditure of a 20% contingency in the amount of $1,043,350.00, for the East Avenue Master Plan Storm Drain Line 8 project, to be funded from Regional Facilities Funds, Account No. 2502801-565011584502-0 J7. Approval to release Maintenance Guarantee Bond No. 6601232, in the amount of $9,849.57, for the Base Line Road Parkway Landscape from Rochester Avenue to 600' east of Rochester Avenue, Contract No. RA09-023. MOTION: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Spagnolo, to approve the staff recommendations in the staff reports. Motion carried 5-0. K. CONSENT CALENDAR -FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT K1. Approval of Minutes: May 26, 2011 (Special Meeting -Proposed Budgets FY 2011/12) June 1, 2011 (Regular Meeting) K2. Approval of Check Register dated May 25 through June 7, 2011, for the total amount of $159,477.87. K3. Approval to receive and file current Investment Schedule as of May 31, 2011. K4. Approval of the following to be in compliance with Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) Statement No. 54: 1) Fund Balance Policy and 2) a resolution committing to the level of fiscal reserves for the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District. RESOLUTION NO. FD 11-026 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, COMMITTING TO THE LEVEL OF FISCAL RESERVES FOR RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT MOTION: Moved by Spagnolo, seconded by Buquet, to approve the staff recommendations in the staff reports. Motion carried 5-0. L. CONSENT CALENDAR -CITY COUNCIL Redevelopment Agency, Fire Protection District, City Council Minutes June 15, 2011 -Page 4 of 12 L1. Approval of Minutes: May 26, 2011 (Special Meeting -Proposed Budgets FY 2011112) June 1, 2011 (Regular Meeting) L2. Approval of Check Register dated May 25 through June 7, 2011, and payroll ending June 7, 2011, for the total amount of $4,896,411.01. L3. Approval to receive and file current Investment Schedule as of May 31, 2011. L4. Approval to Authorize the Advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bids" for the Victoria Gardens Cultural Center LED Sign Project to be funded from Account No. 1615303-5650. RESOLUTION NO. 11-083 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE "VICTORIA GARDENS CULTURAL CENTER LED SIGN PROJECT" IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS L5. Approval of the following to be in compliance with Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) Statement No. 54: 1) Fund Balance Policy and 2) a resolution committing to the level of fiscal reserves far the City of Rancho Cucamonga. RESOLUTION NO. 11-093 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, COMMITTING TO THE LEVEL OF FISCAL RESERVES FOR THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA L6. Approval of a recommendation from the Park and Recreation Commission to approve a light variance requested for Minors, Majors, Juniors and Senior Divisions All-Star Tournament hosted by District 71 Little League during June 24 -July 23, 2011, at Heritage and Red Hill Community Parks. L7. Approval of a recommendation from the Park and Recreation Commission regarding proposed fee modifications for program activities and facilities operated by the Community Services Department. L8. Approval to receive the Community Services Update Report. L9. Approval of a Resolution committing the City to a 50% local match of total construction costs as required to apply for a Transportation Development Act (TDA) -Article 3 Grant to fund construction of the Pacific Electric TraillDay Creek Channel Trail Connection Project. RESOLUTION NO. 11-084 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, COMMITTING THE CITY TO A 50% LOCAL MATCH OF TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST FOR THE PACIFIC ELECTRIC TRAIL/DAY CREEK CHANNEL TRAIL CONNECTION PROJECT L10. Approval of Improvement Agreement Extension for Tract 16227-2, located north of Day Creek Boulevard, west of Etiwanda Avenue, submitted by Ryland Homes. Redevelopment Agency, Fire Protection District, City Council Minutes June 15, 2011 -Page 5 of 12 RESOLUTION NO. 11-085 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 16227-2 L11. Approval of Parcel Map 19247, located at 7089 Etiwanda Avenue, south of Victoria Street, submitted by San Bernardino County Transportation Authority. RESOLUTION NO. 11-071 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP 19247 L12. Approval to endorse the Countywide Vision Statement that has been established by the County of San Bernardino (County) and San Bernardino Associated Governments (SANBAG). L13. Approval of Amendment No. 1 to Tolling Agreement (CO 08-137) between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the County of San Bernardino relating to the City's challenge of the County's calculation of the property tax administration fee beginning in FY 2006/07 through FY 2007/08. L14. Approval and execution of License Agreement between Mavros Industries, LLC (CO 11-072) and the City of Rancho Cucamonga for use of a twenty-foot wide strip of City's storm drain right-of-way, adjacent to Mavros Industries, LLC's property for parking and landscaping purposes. L15. Approval to accept the bids received and award and authorize the execution of a contract in the amount of $767,067.00 to the lowest responsive bidder, PTM General Engineering Services, Inc. (CO 11-073), and authorize the expenditure of a 10% contingency in the amount of $76,706.70 for the construction of Traffic Signals at Three Locations and Signal Interconnect System on Foothill Boulevard from Haven Avenue to Day Creek Boulevard, to be funded from Transportation Funds Account Nos. 11243035650/1765124-0 and 1 1 24 30 3 5650/1 7661 24-0, Street Light District No. 4, Account No. 11543035650/1042154-0, Street Light District No. 8, Account No. 11583035650/1783158-0. L16. Approval of a Master Plan of Storm Drainage Facility Reimbursement Agreement, DRA-41, in conjunction with the development of Tract 16716, located on the east side of Etiwanda Avenue north of Base Line Road, submitted by J.T. Storm Development, LLC. RESOLUTION NO. 11-086 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A MASTER PLAN STORM DRAINAGE FACILITY REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT FOR MASTER PLAN STORM DRAIN LINE XIV-32 IN SANBAG RIGHTS-OF-WAY BETWEEN ETIWANDA AND EAST AVENUES, DRA-41 L17. Approval to award the Victoria Gardens Cultural Center Celebration Hall Flooring Project to HUR Flooring, Inc. (CO 11-074) in the amount of $36,826.00 plus a 5% contingency, to be funded from Account No. 1025001-5304. L18. Approval of a Resolution of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, adopting the Amended Measure "I" Five-Year Capital Improvement Program for the expenditure of Measure "I" Funds covering Fiscal Years 2010/2015. Redevelopment Agency, Fire Protection District, City Council Minutes June 15, 2011 -Page 6 of 12 RESOLUTION NO. 11-087 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE AMENDED MEASURE "I" FIVE-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM COVERING FISCAL YEARS 2010/2015 FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF MEASURE "I" FUNDS L19. Approval of a Resolution renewing the Professional Services Agreement with Aufbau Corporation for providing annual construction inspection and engineering support services for FY 2011/2012, for proposed capital improvement projects throughout the City, to be funded from various individual project accounts as approved in the FY 2011/2012 Budget. Removed from the agenda. RESOLUTION NO. 11-088 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE RENEWAL OF AGREEMENT WITH AUFBAU CORPORATION FOR PROVIDING ANNUAL CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION AND ENGINEERING SUPPORT SERVICES FOR FY 2011/2012 FOR PROPOSED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS THROUGHOUT THE CITY L20. Approval of a Resolution renewing the Professional Services Agreements with Dan Guerra & Associates, Dawson Surveying, Inc., LEH & Associates, Westland Group, Inc. and CSD Land Surveying, Inc., for annual survey services for FY 2011/2012, for proposed capital improvement projects throughout the City, to be funded from various individual project accounts as approved in the FY 2 0 1 1120 1 2 Budget. Removed from the agenda. RESOLUTION NO. 11-089 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE RENEWAL OF AGREEMENTS WITH DAN GUERRA & ASSOCIATES, DAWSON SURVEYING, INC., LEH & ASSOCIATES, WESTLAND GROUP, INC. AND CSD LAND SURVEYING INC., FOR ANNUAL SURVEY SERVICES FOR FY 2011/2012 FOR PROPOSED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS THROUGHOUT THE CITY L21. Approval of a Resolution renewing the Professional Services Agreements with Ninyo & Moore, Salem Engineering Group, Inc., and Leighton Consulting, Inc. for annual soils and materials testing services for FY 2011/2012, for proposed capital improvement projects throughout the City, to be funded from various individual project accounts as approved in the FY 2011/2012 Budget. Removed from the agenda. RESOLUTION NO. 11-090 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE RENEWAL OF AGREEMENTS WITH NINYO 8 MOORE, SALEM ENGINEERING GROUP, INC. AND LEIGHTON CONSULTING, INC. FOR ANNUAL SOILS AND MATERIALS TESTING SERVICES FOR FY 2011/2012 FOR PROPOSED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS THROUGHOUT THE CITY L22. Approval to substitute Improvement Security for remaining work to be completed by Tract Map 16227-1, located at the northwest corner of Day Creek Boulevard and Etiwanda Avenue, submitted by Meritage Homes. Redevelopment Agency, Fire Protection District, City Council Minutes June 15, 2011 -Page 7 of 12 RESOLUTION NO. 11-091 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A NEW IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT MAP 16227-1 AND RELEASING THE CURRENT IMPROVEMENT SECURITY L23. Approval to accept the Citywide Bridge Deck Maintenance Phase 2 of 3, Contract No. 10- 059, as complete; release the bonds, accept a Maintenance Bond, approve the Resolution authorizing the Public Works Services Director to file a Notice of Completion, release the retention, and approve the final contract amount of $644,259.64. RESOLUTION NO. 11-092 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR THE CITYWIDE BRIDGE DECK MAINTENANCE PHASE 2 OF 3 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK Jack Lam, City Manager, requested that Items L19, L20 and L21 be removed from the agenda. MOTION: Moved by Spagnolo, seconded by Williams, to approve the staff recommendations in the staff reports. Motion carried 5-0. M. CONSENT ORDINANCES The following Ordinances have had public hearings at the time of first reading. Second readings are expected to be routine and non-controversial. The Agency, Fire Board, or Council will act upon them at one time without discussion. The City Clerk will read the title. Any item can be removed for discussion by an Agencymember, Boardmember, or Councilmember. M1. CUCAMONGA - A request to amend Section 17.08.90.0.16 (Single-Family Development) by adding a general design guideline for single-story homes in new single-family developments within the Residential Development Districts. The project qualifies under State CEQA Guideline Section 15061(b)(3) because the proposed amendment is to add a design guideline and will not result in an intensification of environmental impacts. ORDINANCE NO. 847 (second reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DRC2010-00724, TO ADD A DESIGN GUIDELINE OF REQUIRING A 25 PERCENT SINGLE-STORY HOME SET-ASIDE FOR NEW SINGLE- FAMILY DEVELOPMENTS OF 4 UNITS OR MORE BY ADDING SUBSECTION (p) OF SECTION 17.08.090.0.16 (SINGLE-FAMILY DEVELOPMENT) OF CHAPTER 17.08 (RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS) OF TITLE 17 (DEVELOPMENT CODE) OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF The Assistant City Clerk/Records Manager read the Titles of Ordinance No. 847. MOTION: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Williams, to approve Ordinance Nos. 847 for second reading. Motion carried 5-0. Redevelopment Agency, Fire Protection District, City Council Minutes June 15, 2011 -Page 8 of 12 N. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS CITY COUNCIL The following items have been advertised and/or posted as public hearings as required by law. The Mayor will open the meeting to receive public testimony. N1. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND MUNICIPAL CODE AMENDMENT DRC2008- 00158 -CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A proposed amendment to the Historic Preservation Ordinance deleting Chapter 2.24, Title 2 of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code and replacing it in its entirety. Staff has prepared a Negative Declaration of environmental impact for consideration. ORDINANCE NO. 848 (first reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING MUNICIPAL CODE AMENDMENT DRC2008-00158, A REQUEST TO DELETE CHAPTER 2.24, TITLE 2 OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE AND REPLACE IT IN ITS ENTIRETY, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF Candyce Burnett, Senior Planner, presented the staff report In response to Council Member Buquet, City Attorney Jim Markman addressed the duties to maintain provision and the penalty provisions. He also discussed the two provisions that were removed and the reasons for their removal. Mr. Markman confirmed to Mayor Michael that the Ordinance was more than adequate to address the City's needs. Council Member Buquet noted that Ordinance No. 848 contains very specific language to tighten up the preservation of historic structures. In response to Mayor Pro Tem Spagnolo, Mr. Markman indicated that the City could request access to historic structures to do the inventory. Also, the City can seek a search warrant if necessary. Council Member Alexander is convinced that remedies are adequate and was satisfied with the provisions in the Ordinance. He noted that ordinances can be amended if the provisions are found to be inadequate. In response to Council Member Williams, Jim Markman noted that the eyes and ears of the community will help identify potential violations. Candyce Burnett noted to Council Member Williams that the Planning Department has information on the historic structures and one of the first things that staff will do is to resurvey these structures to update their files. In response to Mayor Michael, Ms. Burnett indicated that there have been six revisions to this Chapter over the years. There is a new Duty to Maintain provision in this ordinance which further tightens the regulations. Mayor Michael opened the public hearing Gywn Frost noted that the community has seen many historic structures lost and understood that this Ordinance was drafted to prevent that. She expressed a concern with losing a specific state status as the Planning Commission is not separate from the Historical Preservation Commission. Mrs. Frost suggested that an advisory committee be established to acquire this status. Redevelopment Agency, Fire Protection District, City Council Minutes June 15, 2011 -Page 9 of 12 Ed Dietl encouraged the City Attorney to look at Upland and Ontario's regulations as the regulations in these cities contain stiff penalties. He wondered what will happen if a building collapses tomorrow as this Ordinance requires staff to do an extensive review of historic properties, which will take time. Also, the Ordinance is very expensive to property owners. Mr. Dietl encouraged the Council to direct staff to take another review at the ordinances in surrounding cities and refine this Ordinance further. John Lyons expressed a concern with the burden to private property owners. There should be a disclosure to new property owners and this should be realistically addressed. He suggested that volunteers and look at other remedies for historic preservation. Mayor Michael closed the public hearing. In response to Council Member Williams, Ms. Burnett addressed the Certified Local Government Status and noted that the State no longer approves advisory committees for CLG status. Also discussed were the benefits to this status. In response to Mayor Pro Tem Spagnolo's question on the cost to bring improvements up to code, Ms. Burnett indicated that there were regulations unique to historic structures. Mayor Michael addressed the concern with adequate staffing and noted that staff had recommended approval of this Ordinance. Also, he noted that the regulations will be in place in 45 days and encouraged staff to commence the planning process to review these historic structures. Ms. Burnett concurred, noting that the condition of the various historic structures will be evaluated from this date forward. Council Member Buquet appreciated the comments made by Mr. Dietl and concurred that many historic structures have been lost. However, this Ordinance has made many substantive changes to the regulations. This Ordinance accomplishes a lot of positive things. He suggested that the language In response to Mayor Michael, Mr. Markman concurred that the Ordinance can be amended if other penalties can be found. Mayor Michael suggested that Section 2.24.270 be renamed; "Violations, Remedies and Penalties." The Council members concurred with this amendment in Ordinance No. 848. MOTION: Moved by Alexander, seconded by Spagnolo, to take up Ordinance No. 848 for first reading as amended to rename Section 2.24.270, "Violations, Remedies and Penalties and set second reading for July 6, 2011. Motion carried 5-0. O. CITY MANAGERS STAFF REPORTS CITY COUNCIL The following items have no legal publication or posting requirements. 01. BOARD Jon Gillespie, Traffic Engineer, presented the staff report. Mayor Michael suggested that Council Member Williams serve on an Ad Hoc Committee to review the matter and make recommendations to the City Council. Council Member Williams appreciated the Redevelopment Agency, Fire Protection District, City Council Minutes June 15, 2011 -Page 10 of 12 suggestion and outlined past experiences with the Metro Gold Line Joint Powers Authority. She noted the need to monitor the Authority very closely to make sure that the needs of the community are met. Mayor Michael indicated that he would like to serve on the Ad Hoc Committee. The Council members concurred. Mayor Michael noted the need to explore with the Authority the proposed expenditure for the Environmental Analysis. Also, Mayor Michael suggested that the City Council select the preferred track alignment so that there is no mistake that the bridge option is unacceptable. MOTION: Moved by Michael, seconded by Williams, to select the preferred track alignment as the Montclair Station to Metrolink Tracks to Cucamonga Creek Channel to Ontario Airport. Motion carried 5-0. P. COUNCIL BUSINESS P1. COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS (Comments to be limited to three minutes per Councilmember.) Mayor Pro Tem Spagnolo presented background information on the writing of the Pledge of Allegiance. He also reported that the State has adopted a budget which contains the elimination of Redevelopment Agencies. P2. CONSIDERATION OF THE CITY COUNCIL LIBRARY SUB-COMMITTEE'S RECOMMENDATION REGARDING REAPPOINTMENTS TO THE LIBRARY FOUNDATION P3. CONSIDERATION OF THE CITY COUNCIL LIBRARY SUB-COMMITTEE'S RECOMMENDATION REGARDING REAPPOINTMENT TO THE LIBRARY BOARD OF TRUSTEES Council Member Williams reported that the Library Sub-Committee has met and is recommending the re-appointment Tina Gilfry and Chris White to the Library Foundation and the re-appointment of Scott Haddon to the Library Board of Trustees. MOTION: Moved by Spagnolo, seconded by Buquet, to re-appoint Tina Gilfry and Chris White to the library Foundation, and to re-appoint Scott Haddon to the Library Board of Trustees. These appointments are fora 4-year term to expire on June, 2015. Motion carried 5-0. P4. CONSIDERATION OF A RECOMMENDATION FROM THE COMMUNITY SERVICES SUB- Mayor Michael reported the Community Services Subcommittee is recommending the re-appointment of Taro Barag, Thomas Galindo and Jeremy Kahn to the Community and Arts Foundation Board of Directors. MOTION: Moved by Alexander, seconded by Williams, to reappoint Taro Barag, Thomas Galindo and Jeremy Kahn to the Community and Arts Foundation's Board of Directors, fora 4-year term to expire in June, 2015. Motion carried 5-0. Q. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING Mayor Michael requested that a report be prepared for the next meeting regarding LMD 2-R. Redevelopment Agency, Fire Protection District, City Council Minutes June 15, 2011 -Page 11 of 12 R. ADJOURNMENT Mayor Michael adjourned the meeting at 10:04 p.m. in the memory of Warren Luttrull. Respectfully submitted, Debra L. McKay, MMC Assistant City Clerk/Records Manager Approved: ***** Redevelopment Agency, Fire Protection District, City Council Minutes June 15, 2011 -Page 12 of 12 June 27, 2011 RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL CLOSED SESSION MINUTES A. CALL TO ORDER The Rancho Cucamonga City Council held a closed session on Monday, June 27, 2011, in the Tapia Room of the Civic Center located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. The meeting was called to order at 3:00 p.m. by Mayor L. Dennis Michael. Present were Council Members: Bill Alexander, Chuck Buquet, Diane Williams, Mayor Pro Tem Sam Spagnolo and Mayor L. Dennis Michael. Also present were: Jack Lam, City Manager; John Gillison, Assistant City Manager and James Markman, City Attorney. B. ANNOUNCEMENT OF CLOSED SESSION ITEM S Mayor L. Dennis Michael announced the closed session item: CLOSED SESSION PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54957- PUBLIC EMPLOYEE APPOINTMENT. TITLE: CITY MANAGER C. ADJOURNMENT Mayor Michael adjourned the meeting at 3:01 p.m. to the City Council Chamber. D. CALL TO ORDER The Rancho Cucamonga City Council reconvened the meeting in the City Council Chamber located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. The meeting was called to order at 3:05 p.m. by Mayor L. Dennis Michael. Present were Council Members: Bill Alexander, Chuck Buquet, Diane Williams, Mayor Pro Tem Sam Spagnolo and Mayor L. Dennis Michael. Also present were: Jack Lam, City Manager; John Gillison, Assistant City Manager, James Markman, City Attorney, Kathryn L. Scott, Assistant City Clerk and Shirr'I Griffin, Deputy City Clerk. E. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS ON CLOSED SESSION ITEM S E1. Bill Hanlon voiced concerns that the City Council made a backroom deal to hire a new City Manager. He stated that the citizens and the new City Manger will never know if he is the best candidate. He questioned if there was a betrayal to the citizens by spouting they are saving money on a job hunt. He noted that right now we have a City Council who is known as the backroom City Council of Rancho Cucamonga. He said we don't want it that way and asked to' help change it. City Council Minutes Special Meeting of June 27, 2011 -Page 1 of 2 E2. Jerie Lee stated she checked on-line to find out what the substance was for this meeting, and only found an outline. She said she knows it will be about the salary and perks for the new City Manager. She said, as she stated in the letter that she sent to the Council, there is a long list of constituents who think this should be done in public view. She said she is aware that the Brown Act gives them the cover to do this in private; however, with all the public awareness regarding City Managers lately, she said the public needs to be taken seriously. She said we should have the right to know about the abilities of the new City Manager and why he was picked so fast over others. Regarding the announcement of the new City Manager, she was more impressed with what was said in the newspaper than what was said in the previous City Council meeting. F. ADJOURNMENT Mayor Michael adjourned the meeting at 3:13 p.m. to the Tapia Room. G. CONDUCT OF CLOSED SESSION The Rancho Cucamonga City Council reconvened the special meeting in the Tapia Room located in the Civic Center at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. The meeting was reconvened at 3:17 p.m. by Mayor L. Dennis Michael. Present were Council Members: Bill Alexander, Chuck Buquet, Diane Williams, Mayor Pro Tem Sam Spagnolo and Mayor L. Dennis Michael. Also present were: Jack Lam, City Manager; John Gillison, Assistant City Manager and James Markman, City Attorney. H. CITY MANAGER ANNOUNCEMENTS Jim Markman, City Attorney, announced in the City Council Chambers that the contract drafted by the City Attorney to appoint Mr. Gillison as City Manager will be placed on the Agenda for July 6, 2011. for consideration. I. ADJOURNMENT Mayor Michael adjourned the meeting at 4:20 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Kathryn L. Scott, CMC Assistant City Clerk Approved: ***** City Council Minutes Special Meeting of June 27, 2011 -Page 2 of 2 RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Agenda Check Register 6/8/2011 through 6/28/2011 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00310985 6/8/2011 ARC 253.38 AP - 00310985 6/8/2011 ARC 175.47 AP - 00310987 6/8/2011 AUTO AND RV SPECIALISTS INC. 2,000.00 AP - 00310987 6/8/2011 AUTO AND RV SPECIALISTS INC. 2,000.00 AP - 00311141 6/15/2011 AUFBAU CORPORATION 9,272.00 AP - 00311141 6/15/2011 AUFBAU CORPORATION 5,277.00 AP - 00311141 6/15/2011 AUFBAU CORPORATION 11,400.00 AP - 00311153 6/15/2011 BUTSKO UTILITY DESIGN INC. 761.00 AP - 00311154 6/15/2011 C2 REPROGRAPHICS 449.14 AP - 00311154 6/15/2011 C2 REPROGRAPHICS 296.04 AP - 00311154 6/15/2011 C2 REPROGRAPHICS 449.14 AP - 00311166 6/15/2011 CALIFORNIA TRAVEL MEDIA 6,000.00 AP - 00311184 6/15/2011 COSTAR REALTY INFORMATION INC 1,181.00 AP - 00311185 6/15/2011 CQ PRODUCTIONS 1,000.00 AP = 00311190 6/15/2011 DAN GUERRA AND ASSOCIATES 38,212.50 AP - 00311235 6/15/2011 INLAND EMPIRE UTILITIES AGENCY 19,238.53 AP - 00311244 6/15/2011 JACOBS ENGINEERING 6,224.96 AP - 00311279 6/15/2011 NATIONAL CONSTRUCTION RENTALS INC 36.00 AP - 00311281 6/15/2011 NINYO & MOORE 8,129.25 AP - 00311287 6/15/2011 ORCHARD CAPITAL LP 29,265.87 AP - 00311307 6/15/2011 RANCHO CUCAMONGA CHAMBER OF COMMEI 4,750.11 AP - 00311396 6/22/2011 ADVANTAGE ADHESIVES 2,322.00 AP - 00311398 6/22/2011 AECOM 319,135.41 AP - 00311410 • 6/22/2011 ARC 131.10 AP - 00311410 6/22/2011 ARC 154.07 AP - 00311428 6/22/2011 CHAFFEY COMMUNITY COLLEGE 492,747.68 AP - 00311429 6/22/2011 CHINO BASIN WATER CONSERVATION DISTRIc 49,262.62 AP - 00311477 6/22/2011 INLAND EMPIRE RESOURCE CONSERVATION L 22,629.10 AP - 00311507 6/22/2011 NATIONAL CONSTRUCTION RENTALS INC 36.00 AP - 00311507 6/22/2011 NATIONAL CONSTRUCTION RENTALS INC 170.19 AP - 00311511 6/22/2011 OFFICE DEPOT 78.29 AP - 00311511 6/22/2011 OFFICE DEPOT 3.07 AP - 00311530 6/22/2011 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 2,641.02 AP - 00311532 6/22/2011 RTK ARCHITECTS INC 627.71 AP - 00311537 6/22/2011 SAN BERNARDINO CTY SUPERINTENDENT OF 105,915.10 AP - 00311545 6/22/2011 SOCIAL VOCATIONAL SERVICES 750.00 AP - 00311560 6/22/2011 TMAD TAYLOR & GAINES 1,400.00 AP - 00311566 6/22/2011 VEND U COMPANY 208.49 AP - 00311567 6/22/2011 VERIZON BUSINESS 3,235.46 Total for Check ID AP: 1,147,818.70 Total for Entity: 1,147,818.70 P1 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 1 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Current Date: 06/30/201 Time: 07:17:3 STAFF REPORT REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Date: July 6, 2011 To: Chairman and Members of the Redevelopment Agency Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager From: Linda D. Daniels, Deputy City Manager/Community Development By: - Ingrid Y. Bruce, GIS/Special Districts Manager ,..~ ' ~' j _ •~' - - -- ~ '_ ~~ -, ., ., RANCHO C,UCAMONGA Subject: CONSIDERATION OF ADOPTION OF A.RESOLUTION TO AUTHORIZE THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OR HIS DESIGNEE TO SUBMIT ASSESSMENT BALLOTS ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY IN THE PROCEEDINGS TO FORM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2-R RECOMMENDATION Adopt a resolution authorizing the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency Executive Director or his designee to complete and submit assessment ballots on behalf of the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency in the proceedings to form the City of Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 2-R ("LMD 2-R"). BACKGROUND The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga (the "City") has initiated proceedings to consider the formation of LMD 2-R to replace existing Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 and to provide for the levy of special assessments within LMD 2-R to finance the maintenance and servicing of the paseos, parkways, median islands, street trees, parks, landscaped sites and appurtenant facilities that are throughout the Victoria Planned Community. These improvements are located within the street right-of-ways, dedicated public easements and parks which are within the boundaries of the District. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 4 of Article XIIID of the California Constitution ("Article XIIID"), the City retained the services of NBS to provide assessment engineering services pertaining to the proceedings to consider the formation of LMD 2-R, including but not limited to, the identification of those properties that will receive special benefit from the maintenance and servicing of the improvements. NBS has determined that certain properties owned by the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency (RDA) and located within the proposed boundaries will receive special benefit from the maintenance and servicing of the improvements. The Redevelopment Agency properties (the "RDA Properties") are located at 12194, 12226 and 12272 Base Line Road and, pursuant to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 2-R Fiscal Year 2011/12 Engineer's Report dated June 2011 and submitted by NBS (the "Engineer's Report"), assessments totaling $1,584.70 are proposed to be levied against the RDA Properties for Fiscal Year 2011 /12 to represent the special benefit to be received by the RDA Properties. P2 P3 CONSIDERATION OF ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION TO AUTHORIZE THE RANCHO PAGE 2 CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OR HIS DESIGNEE TO SUBMIT ASSESSMENT BALLOTS ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY IN THE PROCEEDINGS TO FORM LANDS ULY 6, 2011 Staff has reviewed the Engineer's Report and concurs with NBS that the proposed assessments accurately reflect such special benefit to be received by the RDA Properties. Article XIIID of the California Constitution provides that a record owner proposed to be assessed in a Proposition 218 ballot process may express such owner's support for, or opposition to, the levy of a proposed assessment against such owner's property by completing and submitting an assessment ballot. For property owned by a public entity, record owner means the authorized representative of that public entity. Accordingly, with respect to the RDA owned properties mentioned above, the Executive Director of the Redevelopment Agency may submit completed assessments ballots on behalf of the Redevelopment Agency Board of Directors, if so authorized. Staff recommends that the Redevelopment Agency Board authorize completed and submitted on behalf of the Redevelopment Agency in proposed assessments against the RDA Properties for Fiscal Yea resolution, if adopted designates the RDA Executive Director or his submit assessment ballots on behalf of the Redevelopment Agency in proposed assessments against the RDA Properties. Respectfully submitted, J :~. o~~ Lin a D. Daniels Deputy City Manager/Community Development Attachment: assessment ballots to be support of the levy of the r 2011 /12. The attached designee to complete and support of the levy of the Resolution P4 RESOLUTION NO. RDA 11- ~!~ A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY (RDA), SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE RDA EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OR HIS DESIGNEE TO SUBMIT ASSESSMENT BALLOTS ON BEHALF OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY IN THE PROCEEDINGS TO FORM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2-R AND PROVIDING DIRECTION ON THE SUBMISSION OF SAID ASSESSMENT BALLOTS WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga (the "City"), acting under the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 (the "1972 Act"), Article XIIID of the Constitution of the State of California ("Article XIIID") and the Proposition 218 Omnibus Implementation Act ("Proposition 218"), (the 1972 Act, Article XIIID and Proposition '218 are collectively referred to as the "Assessment Law"), approved the commencement of procedures for the formation of Landscape Maintenance District No. 2-R ("LMD 2-R") to replace Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 and the levy of assessments within Landscape Maintenance District No. 2-R, so that property owners may approve increased funding for the maintenance. and servicing of improvements; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of Section 4 of Article XIIID of the California Constitution ("Article XIIID"), the City retained the .services of NBS to provide assessment engineering services pertaining to the proceedings to consider the formation of LMD 2-R, including but not limited to, the identification of those properties that will receive special benefit from the maintenance and servicing of the improvements; and WHEREAS, NBS has determined that certain properties owned by the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency (the "Redevelopment Agency") and located within the proposed boundaries of LMD 2-R will receive special benefits from the maintenance and servicing of the improvements; WHEREAS, such Redevelopment Agency properties (the "RDA Properties") are located at 12194, 12226 and 12272 Base Line Road and, pursuant to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 2-R Fiscal Year 2011/12 Engineer's Report dated June 2011 and prepared and submitted by NBS (the "Engineer's Report") to the City Council, assessments of $1,584.70 are proposed to be levied against the RDA Properties for Fiscal Year 2011/12 (the "Proposed Assessments") to represent the special benefits to be received by the RDA Properties; and WHEREAS, the City Council has, pursuant to the Assessment Law, set a public hearing to be held on July 20, 2011 to consider the formation of LMD 2-R and -the levy of assessments therein and directed the City Clerk to give notice of such public hearing, together with assessment ballots pursuant to which the record owners of all properties proposed to be assessed may express their support for or their opposition to the proposed levy of assessments against their properties; and WHEREAS, the Board of Directors concurs that the Proposed Assessments represent the special benefits to be received by the RDA Properties and has determined that it would be in the public interest for the Redevelopment Agency to support the levy of the Proposed Assessment on the RDA Properties. NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency does hereby resolve, determine and order as follows: ~ SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2: That the Board of Directors hereby designates the RDA Executive Director or his designee as the representative of the Redevelopment Agency for the purpose of completing and submitting assessment ballots on behalf of the Redevelopment Agency pertaining to the Proposed Assessments applicable to the RDA Properties and directs the RDA Executive Director or his designee to complete the assessment ballots to indicate the support of the Redevelopment Agency to the levy of the Proposed Assessments against the RDA Properties. SECTION 3: That this resolution shall become effective upon its adoption. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this _ day of July, 2011. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: L. Dennis Michael, Chairman ATTEST: Jack Lam, Secretary 1, JACK LAM, SECRETARY of the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency, at a regular meeting of said Board held on the day of July 2011. Executed this day of July 2011 at Rancho Cucamonga, California. P5 Jack Lam, Secretary P6 STAFF REPORT FNGTNEFRING SERVICES DEP_-1RT\:IT1~~T Date: July 6, 2011 To: Chairman and Redevelopment Agency Members Jack Lam, AICP, Executive Director ~7 ~- , -~ RANCHO CUCAMONGA From: Mark A. Steuer, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer By: Walter C. Stickney, Associate Engineer ~~ Shelley Hayes, Assistant Engineer ~" Subject: ACCEPT THE PACIFIC ELECTRIC TRAIL PHASE 4 - GROVE AVENUE TO AMETHYST AVENUE, CONTRACT NO. RA09-014 AS .COMPLETE, RETAIN THE FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND AS A GUARANTEE BOND, RELEASE THE LABOR AND MATERIAL BOND, AND AUTHORIZE THE CITY ENGINEER TO FILE A NOTICE OF COMPLETION AND APPROVE THE F-NAL CONTRACT AMOUNT OF $2,601,565.21 RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Redevelopment Agency accept the Pacific Electric Trail Phase 4 - Grove Avenue to Amethyst Avenue, Contract No. RA09-014, as complete, authorize the City Engineer to file a ~ Notice of Completion, retain the Faithful Performance Bond in lieu of a Maintenance Bond, authorize the release of the Labor and Materials Bond in the amount of $2,335,350.59 six months after the recordation of said notice if no claims have been received and authorize the release of the retention in the amount of $260,156.52, 35 days after acceptance. Also, approve the final contract amount of $2,601,565.21. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The subject project has been completed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The Pacific Electric Trail Phase 4 -Grove Avenue to Amethyst Avenue improvements scope of work consisted of construction of concrete pedestrian/bicycle tail, decomposed granite jogging/equestrian trail, trail lighting, landscaping with irrigation, and traffic signals at intersections. Pertinent information of the project is as follows: - Budgeted Amount: - Account Numbers: Engineer's Estimate: :- City Council Approval to Advertise Publish dates for local paper: Bid Opening: $6,000,000.00 2660801-5650/1615660-0 and 1214303-5650/1544214-0 $5,613,983.00 May 6, 2009 May 12 and 19, 2009 July 14, 2009 P7 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY STAFF REPORT Re: Pacific Electric Trail Phase 4 -Grove Avenue to Amethyst Avenue July 6, 2011 Page 2 ~ Contract Award Date: ~ Low Bidder: Contract Amount: 10% Contingency: Final Contract Amount: Difference in Contract Amount: August 5, 2009 Southwest Construction Company, Inc. $2,335,350.59 $467,070.12 $2,601,565.21 $266,214.62 011.4%) The net increase in the total cost of the project is a result of forty-one (41) Contract Change Orders, including the balancing statement. It's noted that most of the changes were requested by the City. The notable changes that were significant to the increase of the Contract amount were: remove five and pour five new light pole footings due to lowered grade, between Hellman Avenue and Base Line Road; add drinking fountain at the future rest area near the Rains House; additional pavement markings, legends and signs; additional PVC fencing; added a v-ditch to prevent slope erosion west of the Cucamonga Creek Channel; install lighting contactors and time clocks to turn lights off in daylight; additional cobble paving at Hellman Avenue and Base Line Road to' improve aesthetics; weed abatement along trail; trim eucalyptus trees between Hellman Avenue and Vineyard Avenue; Rochester Avenue drainage modifications discovered after heavy rains; added ADA truncated domes at crossings; additional sidewalk at Carnelian Avenue for public safety; add chain link fence and gates due to existing railroad bridge removal; extra work at flood control ramp due to grade change; battery backup systems for signals at Grove Avenue, Hellman Avenue and Base Line Road; and grading a concrete swale at Rochester Avenue to alleviate drainage issues. The balancing statement accounted for other minor increases and decreases in the project quantities. Respectfully submitted,. ~ ~` :..._ ~,,; ,~ - ' rk er Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer MAS/WCS/SH:Is Attachment P8 .~ ~ NA OR r--1 yP~ ~J ` i 1---•----- ----- -- -- ------~ ~ -.. --•-----~_•~ I I ~ I 41LLSI~ E RD ' ILL IDE R I, ~ ` ~ ILSC AV I WI N AV LSON AV EcC I a ~ ~ < --~ ~ '~•\ _ ~ W v~i BANY N ST ~ wl ~ w ~ ~ I OFW 121 II Z 210 ° H tr ~ w p ~ 1 a 2 V CTORI v '~ ~ ~ ~ > !BASE N B SELI ~ r ~• GHU H S CHU CN S ~~ C ` y l J F OTH BL ~ ~- T T RO ¢ 6 ,IERSEI' BL ~ AtH ST ¢ ~ ST ~ --- ~, 6TH ST z~ST Q Z~ Z `, 4TH 5 ~ N PROJECT Vicinity Nlap Pacific Electric Inland Empire Trail Phases 4a and 4b Grove Ave to Amethyst Ave P9 RESOLUTION NO. JQ~ ~~' ~~~ A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PACIFIC ELECTRIC TRAIL PHASE 4 - GROVE AVENUE TO AMETHYST AVENUE, CONTRACT NO. RA09-014 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the Pacific Electric Trail Phase 4 -Grove Avenue to Amethyst Avenue, Contract No. RA09-014, has been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. NOW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency, Rancho Cucamonga, California, hereby resolves that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT P10 Agenda Check Register 6/8/2011 through 6/28/2011 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00310990 6/8/2011 BERCH, DAVID M. 140.00 AP - 00310990 6/8/2011 BERCH, DAVID M. 140.00 AP - 00310996 6/8/2011 CARQUES'I' AUTO PARTS 13.91 AP - 00311008 6/8/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 255.26 AP - 00311008 6/8/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 159.45 AP - 00311008 6/8/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 73.60 AP - 00311010 6/8/2011 DEPARTMENT OF FORESTRY AND FIRE PROTE 108.00 AP - 00311016 6/8/2011 FALCON, BRIAN 185.00 AP - 00311017 6/8/2011 FIRSTLINE GLOVES INC. 1,185.38 AP - 00311024 6/8/2011 GRACIANO, TAMMIE 167.50 AP - 00311042 6/8/2011 LIEBERT CASSIDY WHITMORE 2,343.00 AP - 00311044 6/8/2011 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 219.53 AP - 00311044 6/8/2011 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 656.02 AP - 00311045 6/8/2011 MARLINK SA INC 135.00 AP - 00311051 6/8/2011 NEXTEL 39.99 AP - 00311052 6/8/2011 NUSTAGROUP.COM 68.96 AP - 00311052 6/8/2011 NUSTAGROUP.COM 47.73 AP - 00311055 6/8/2011 OFFICE DEPOT . 8.48 AP - 00311055 6/8/2011 OFFICE DEPOT 720.34 AP - 00311055 6/8/2011 OFFICE DEPOT 49.07 AP - 00311062 6/8/2011 PDSI 675.00 AP - 00311065 6/8/2011 PF SERVICES INC ~ 331.40 AP - 00311069 6/8/2011 RAYNE WATER CONDITIONING INC 26.25 AP - 00311073 6/8/2011 ROEDER, JEFF 200.00 AP - 00311074 6/8/2011 ROJER, IVAN M. 40.00 , AP - 00311074 6/8/2011 ROJER, IVAN M. 165.00 AP - 00311076 6/8/2011 SC FUELS 2,316.51 AP - 00311076 6/8/2011 SC FUELS 1,336.46 AP - 00311079 6/8/2011 SMART AND FINAL 172.87 AP - 00311079 6/8/2011 SMART AND FINAL 61.34 AP - 00311083 6/8/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 620.21 AP - 00311083 6/8/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 684.20 AP - 00311083 6/8/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 1,297.39 AP - 00311089 6/8/2011 SWIFTY SIGN 1,718.25 AP - 00311091 6/8/2011 TERMINIX PROCESSING CENTER 48.75 AP - 00311091 ~ 6/8/2011 TERMINIX PROCESSING CENTER 73.00 AP - 00311096 6/8/2011 iJNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 54.82 AP - 00311096 6/8/2011 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 54.82 AP - 00311096 6/8/2011 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 54.82 AP - 00311101 6/8/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 366.63 AP - 00311101 6/8/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 98.42 AP - 00311101 6/8/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 709.30 AP - 00311101 6/8/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 221.35 AP - 00311101 6/8/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 79.40 AP - 00311101 6/8/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 35.91 AP - 00311101 6/8/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 46.67 ~AP - 00311103 6/8/2011 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 475.03 AP - 00311103 6/8/2011 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 475.03 AP - 00311103 6/8/2011 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 475.03 AP - 00311103 6/8/2011 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 110.68 AP - 00311103 6/8/2011 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 18.54 AP - 00311103 6/8/2011 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 36.89 AP - 00311103 6/8/2011 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 36.89 AP - 00311103 6/8/2011 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 36.89 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 1 Current Date: 06/30/201 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 07:18:3 RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT P11 Agenda Check ReEister 6/8/2011 through 6/28/2011 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00311103 6/8/2011 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 110.68 AP - 00311103 6/8/2011 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 38.89 AP - 00311103 6/8/2011 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 475.03 AP - 00311105 6/8/2011 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 33.22 AP - 00311105 6/8/2011 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 13.84 AP - 00311105 6/8/2011 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 810.39 AP - 00311111 6/9/2011 AIRGAS WEST 97.85 AP - 00311111 6/9/2011 AIRGAS WEST 52.90 AP - 00311111 6/9/2011 AIRGAS WEST 79.87 AP - 00311111 6/9/2011 AIRGAS WEST 759.99 AP - 00311111 6/9/2011 AIRGAS WEST 127.14 AP - 00311111 6/9/201 I AIRGAS WEST 61.89 AP - 00311115 6/9/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 292.07 AP - 00311115 6/9/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 92.00 AP - 00311115 6/9/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 969.63 AP - 00311115 6/9/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 162.97 AP - 00311132 6/15/2011 ALLSTAR FIRE EQUIPMENT INC 583.66 AP - 00311132 6/15/2011 ALLSTAR FIRE EQUIPMENT INC 694.15 AP - 00311134 6/15/2011 AMBU INC. 4,937.40 AP - 00311135 6/15/2011 AMERICAN SCALE CO INC 205.50 AP - 00311148 6/15/2011 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC. 413.8b AP - 00311156 6/15/2011 CALIFORNIA FIRE & RESCUE TRAINING AUTH( 1,225.00 AP - 00311170 6/15/2011 CARQUEST AUTO PARTS 25.09 AP - 00311171 6/15/2011 CARSON, DANIEL 100.00 AP - 00311171 6/15/2011 CARSON, DANIEL 40.00 AP - 00311195 6/15/2011 DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL SERVICES 80.00 AP - 00311196 6/15/2011 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 102.00 AP - 00311202 .6/15/2011 EMSAAC 299.00 AP - 00311236 6/15/2011 INLAND OVERHEAD DOOR COMPANY 357.50 AP -00311242 6/15/2011 INTERBRAND DESIGN FORUM 110.00 AP - 00311254 6/15/2011 LASER LINE ~ 380.46 AP - 00311261 6/15/2011 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 11.92 AP - 00311261 6/15/2011 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 20.66 AP - 00311261 6/15/2011 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 12.79 AP - 00311261 6/15/2011 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 162.24 AP - 00311261 6/15/2011 LOVJES COMPANIES INC. 22.28 AP - 00311261 6/15/2011 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 75.00 AP - 00311261 6/15/2011 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 6.39 AP - 00311262 6/15/2011 LUBRICATION ENGINEERS INC 2,148.01 AP - 00311264 6/15/2011 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 2,555.24 AP - 00311264 6/15/2011 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 2,004.74 AP - 00311280 6/15/2011 NEXTEL 37.61 AP - 00311284 6/15/2011 NUSTAGROUP.COM 2,356.49 AP - 00311315 6/15/2011 RODRIGUEZ INC, R Y 2,523.96 AP - 00311321 6/15/2011 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY 3,168.50 AP - 00311321 6/15/2011 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY 2,534.80 AP - 00311321 6/15/2011 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY 633.70 AP - 00311332 6/15/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 760.79 AP - 00311332 6/15/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 90.55 AP - 00311345 6/15/2011 TERMINIX PROCESSING CENTER 71.00 AP - 00311345 6/15/201 ] TERMINIX PROCESSING CENTER 65.00 AP - 00311345 6/15/2011 TERMINIX PROCESSING CENTER 81.00 AP - 00311348 6/15/2011 TOLL, RICHARD 165.00 AP - 00311348 6/15/2011 TOLL, RICHARD 40.00 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 2 Current Date: 06/30/201 Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 07:18:3 RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT P12 Agenda Check Register 6/8/2011 through 6/28/2011 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00311356 6/15/2011 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 114.69 AP - 00311356 6/15/2011 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 38.06 AP - 00311356 6/15/2011 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 549.25 AP - 00311356 6/15/2011 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 473.06 AP - 00311356 6/15/2011 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 36.89 AP -.00311360 6/15/2011 WALKER, ROBERT 165.00 AP - 00311360 6/15/2011 WALKER, ROBERT 40.00 AP - 00311366 6/15/2011 WEST END UNIFORMS 50.14 AP - 00311370 6/15/2011 WILLDAN ASSOCIATES 4,944.00 AP - 00311381 6/16/2011 DAISY WHEEL RIBBON CO INC 1,530.07 AP - 00311381 6/16/2011 DAISY WHEEL RIBBON CO INC 1,000.00 AP - 00311395 6/22/2011 ADAMS, SHANE 190.00 AP - 00311400 6/22/2011 ALL CITIES TOOLS 288.19 AP - 00311412 6/22/2011 ASR CONSTRUCTORS 106,418.77 AP - 00311412 6/22/2011 ASR CONSTRUCTORS -10,641.88 AP - 00311421 6/22/2011 BURTON'S FIRE INC 207.14 AP - 00311431 6/22/2011 CITIBANK 10,641.88 AP - 00311443 6/22/2011 DEPARTMENT OF FORESTRY AND FIRE PROTE 268.00 AP - 00311457 6/22/2011 FERRER, GABE 115.00 AP - 00311469 6/22/2011 GT ENGINEERING 4,502.25 AP - 00311469 6/22/2011 GT ENGINEERING 2,120.63 AP - 00311469 6/22/2011 GT ENGINEERING 1,900.00 AP - 00311487 6/22/2011 KIRKPATRICK, WILLIAM M 80.42 AP - 00311488 6/22/2011 KME FIRE APPARATUS 274.05 •AP - 00311488 6/22/2011 KME FIRE APPARATUS 1,126.65 AP - 00311488 6/22/2011 KME FIRE APPARATUS 6,242.25 AP - 00311493 6/22/2011 LEBA, QUANG 165.00 AP - 00311494 6/22/2011 LICHTMAN, OFER ~ 143.73 AP - 00311498 6/22/2011 MARK CHRISTOPHER INC 173.72 AP - 00311507 6/22/2011 NATIONAL CONSTRUCTION RENTALS INC 12.60 AP - 00311511 6/22/2011 OFFICE DEPOT 14.64 AP - 00311511 6/22/2011 OFFICE DEPOT 124.92 AP - 00311511 6/22/2011 OFFICE DEPOT 249.84 AP - 00311511 6/22/2011 OFFICE DEPOT 124.92 AP - 00311511 6/22/2011 OFFICE DEPOT 191.29 AP - 00311511 6/22/2011 OFFICE DEPOT 300.93 AP - 00311529 6/22/2011 RGS ENGINEERING GEOLOGY 11,895.00 AP - 00311538 6/22/2011 SAN BERNARDINO CTY 3,,168.50 AP - 00311538 6/22/2011 SAN BERNARDINO CTY 2,534.80 AP - 00311538 6/22/2011 SAN BERNARDINO CTY 633.70 AP - 00311541 6/22/2011 SCOTT MCLEOD PLUMBING INC 395.00 AP - 00311544 6/22/2011 SMART AND FINAL 90.91 AP - 00311544 6/22/2011 SMART AND FINAL 78.53 AP - 00311555 6/22/2011 SWEEPS LUCK 139.00 AP - 00311561 6/22/2011 TRAK ENGINEERING INC 323.75 AP - 00311563 6/22/2011 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 54.82 AP - 00311568 6/22/2011 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 43.16 AP - 00311568 6/22/2011 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 168.67 AP - 00311568 6/22/2011 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 175.55 AP - 00311580 6/22/2011 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 1,133.60 AP - 00311580 6/22/2011 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 289.21 AP - 00311581 6/22/2011 WESTPAC HEAVY DUTY OF CALIFORNIA LLC 108.66 AP - 00311583 6/23/2011 AIRGAS WEST 526.28 AP - 00311583 6/23/2011 AIRGAS WEST 136.42 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 3 Current Date: 06/30/201 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAI T_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 07:18:3 RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT P13 Agenda Check Register 6/8/2011 through 6/28/2011 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00311583 6/23/2011 AIRGAS WEST 52.90 AP - 00311583 6/23/2011 AIRGAS WEST 97.85 AP - 00311583 6/23/2011 AIRGAS WEST 79.87 AP - 00311583 6/23/2011 . AIRGAS WEST 61.89 AP - 00311590 6/23/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 55.20 AP - 00311590 6/23!2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 358.95 AP - 00311590 6/23/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 55.20 AP - 00311601 6/27/2011 PUBLIC AGENCY SELF INSURANCE SYSTEM 1,523.70 AP - 00311601 6/27/2011 PUBLIC AGENCY SELF INSURANCE SYSTEM 1,666.24 AP - 00311601 6/27/2011 PUBLIC AGENCY SELF INSURANCE SYSTEM 8,878.40 AP - 00311601 6/27/2011 PUBLIC AGENCY SELF INSURANCE SYSTEM 8,799.75 AP - 00311601 6/27/2011 PUBLIC AGENCY SELF INSURANCE SYSTEM 1,277.94 AP - 00311601 6/27/2011 PUBLIC AGENCY SELF INSURANCE SYSTEM 3,719.13 AP - 00311601 6/27/2011 PUBLIC AGENCY SELF INSURANCE SYSTEM 10,293.96 AP - 00311601 6/27/2011 PUBLIC AGENCY SELF INSURANCE SYSTEM 9,043.87 AP - 00311601 6/27/2011 PUBLIC AGENCY SELF INSURANCE SYSTEM 11,617.75 AP - 00311601 6/27/2011 PUBLIC AGENCY SELF INSURANCE SYSTEM 9,614.03 AP - 00311601 6/27/2011 PUBLIC AGENCY SELF INSURANCE SYSTEM 10,384.07 AP -00311601 6/27/2011 PUBLIC AGENCY SELF INSURANCE SYSTEM 10,290.68 AP - 00311601 6/27/2011 PUBLIC AGENCY SELF INSURANCE SYSTEM 2,567.35 AP - 00311601 6/27/2011 PUBLIC AGENCY SELF INSURANCE SYSTEM 3,740.43 AP - 00311601 6/27/2011 PUBLIC AGENCY SELF INSURANCE SYSTEM 776.59 AP - 00311601 6/27/2011 PUBLIC AGENCY SELF INSURANCE SYSTEM 2,547.69 AP - 00311601 6/27/2011 PUBLIC AGENCY SELF INSURANCE SYSTEM 3,402.92 AP - 00311601 6/27/2011 PUBLIC AGENCY SELF INSURANCE SYSTEM 12,833.45 AP - 00311601 6/27/2011 PUBLIC AGENCY SELF INSURANCE SYSTEM 10,579.04 AP - 00311601 6/27/2011 PUBLIC AGENCY SELF INSURANCE SYSTEM 304.74 AP - 00311601 6/27/2011 PUBLIC AGENCY SELF INSURANCE SYSTEM 1,356.58 AP - 00311601 6/27/2011 PUBLIC AGENCY SELF INSURANCE SYSTEM 34.41 AP - 00311601 6/27/2011 PUBLIC AGENCY SELF INSURANCE SYSTEM 10,094.08 AP - 00311602 6/28/2011 DAGUE, JAMES 1,466.48 AP - 00311603 6/28/2011 KILMER, STEPHEN 1,020.40 AP - 00311604 6/28/2011 WALKER, KENNETH 325.66 Total for Check ID AP: 348,142.42 EP - 00001852 6/28/2011 AHUMADA, ALEXANDER R 1,530.36 EP - 00001853 6/28/2011 ALMAND, LLOYD 759.32 EP - 00001854 6/28/2011 ARTHUR, VERA A. 174.30 EP - 00001855 6/28/2011 BANTAU, VICTORIA 423.90 EP - 00001856 6/28/2011 BAZAL, SUSAN 1,192.50 EP - 00001857 6/28/2011 BERRY, DAVID 760.00 EP - 00001858 6/28/2011 BILLINGS, ESTER 229.88 EP - 00001859 6/28/2011 CARNES, KENNETH 608.30 EP - 00001860 6/28/2011 CORCORAN, ROBERT 1,466.48 EP - 00001861 6/28/2011 COX, FAYE 174.30 EP - 00001862 ~ 6/28/2011 COX, KARL 759.32 EP - 00001863 6/28/2011 CRANE, RALPH 1,913.36 EP - 00001864 6/28/2011 CROSSLAND, WILBUR 456.60 EP - 00001865 6/28/2011 DE ANTONIO, SUSAN 679.24 EP - 00001866 6/28/2011 DOMINICK, SAMUEL A. 1,466.48 EP - 00001867 6/28/2011 EAGLESON, MICHAEL 1,938.82 EP - 00001868 6/28/2011 FRITCHEY, JOHN D. 760.00 EP - 00001869 6/28/2011 HEYDE, DONALD 1,466.48 EP - 00001870 6/28/2011 INTERLICCHIA, ROSALYN 627.97 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 4 Current Date: 06/30/201 Report:CK_AGENDA REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register-Portrait Layout Time: 07:18:3 RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT P14 Agenda Check Register 6/8/2011 through 6/28/2011 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name .Amount EP - 00001871 6/28/2011 LANE, WILLIAM 1,938.82 EP - 00001872 6/28/2011 LEE, ALLAN 1,368.46 EP - 00001873 6/28/2011 LENZE, PAUL E 1,184.02 EP - 00001874 6/28/2011 LONGO, JOE 174.30 EP - 00001875 6/28/2011 LUTTRULL, DARRELL 608.30 EP - 00001876 6/28/2011. MACKALL, BENJAMIN 174.30 EP - 00001877 6/28/2011 MAYFIELD, RON 2,519.77 EP - 00001878 6/28/2011 MCKEE, JOHN 1,942.75 EP - 00001879 6/28/2011 MCMILLEN, LINDA 450.73 EP - 00001880 6/28/2011 MCNEIL, KENNETH 2,360.24 EP - 00001881 6/28/2011 MICHAEL, L. DENNIS 1,466.48 EP - 00001882 6/28/2011 MORGAN, BYRON 1,933.73 EP - 00001883 6/28/2011 MYSKOW, DENNIS 760.00 EP - 00001884 6/28/2011 NAUMAN, MICHAEL 760.00 EP - 00001885 6/28/2011 NEE, RON 2,519.77 EP - 00001886 6/28/2011 NELSON, MARY JANE .174.30 EP - 00001887 6/28/2011 PLOUNG, MICHAEL J 760.00 EP - 00001888 6/28/2011 POST, MICHAEL R 1,548.12 EP - 00001889 6/28/2011 SALISBURY, THOMAS 760.00 EP - 00001890 6/28/2011 SMITH, RONALD 760.00 EP - 00001891 ~ 6/28/2011 SPAGNOLO, SAM 456.60 EP - 00001892 6/28/2011 SPAIN, WILLIAM 608.30 EP - 00001893 6/28/2011 SULLIVAN, JAMES 847.90 EP - 00001894 6/28/2011 TAYLOR, STEVE 1,184.02 EP - 00001895 6/28/2011 TULEY, TERRY 1,466.48 EP - 00001896 6/28/2011 VANDERKALLEN, FRANCIS 1,466.48 EP - 00001897 6/28/2011 WOLFE, DUANE 1,913.36 EP - 00001898 6/28/2011 YOWELL, TIMOTHY A 2,519.77 Total for Check ID EP: 52,014.61 Total for Entity: 400,157.03 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 5 Current Date: 06/30/201 Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 07:18:3 MEMORANDUM R-1NCHO CUCI~MONG.~ FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Date: July 6, 2011 To: President and Members of the Board of Directors Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager From: Mike Bell, Fire Chief Ingrid Y. Bruce, GIS/Special Districts Manager By: RANCHO C,UCAMONGA Subject: CONSIDERATION OF ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION TO THE APPOINTING AUTHORITY OR HIS DESIGNEE TO SUBMIT AN ASSESSMENT BALLOT ON BEHALF OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT IN THE PROCEEDINGS TO FORM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2-R RECOMMENDATION Adopt a resolution authorizing the Appointing Authority or his designee to complete and submit an assessment ballot on behalf of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District in the proceedings to form the City of Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 2-R ("LMD 2-R"). BACKGROUND The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga (the "City") has initiated proceedings to consider the formation of LMD 2-R to replace existing Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 and to provide for the levy of special assessments within LMD 2-R to finance the maintenance and servicing of the paseos, parkways, median islands, street trees, parks, landscaped sites and appurtenant facilities that are throughout the Victoria Planned Community. These improvements are located within the street right-of-ways, dedicated public easements and parks which are within the boundaries of the District. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 4 of Article. XIIID of the California Constitution ("Article XIIID"), the City retained the services of NBS to provide assessment engineering services pertaining to the proceedings to consider the formation of LMD 2-R, including but not limited to, the ideritification of those properties that will receive special benefit from the maintenance and servicing of the improvements. NBS has determined that a certain property owned by the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and located within the proposed boundaries will receive special benefit from the maintenance and servicing of the improvements. The Fire Protection District property (the "FIRE Property") is located at 12270 Firehouse Court and, pursuant to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 2-R Fiscal Year 2011/12 Engineer's Report dated June 2011 and submitted by NBS (the "Engineer's Report"), assessment amount of $281.75 is proposed to be levied against the FIRE Property for Fiscal Year 2011/12 to represent the special benefit to be received by the FIRE Property. P15 Staff has reviewed the Engineer's Report and concurs with NBS that the proposed assessments accurately reflect such special benefit to be received by the FIRE Property. P16 CONSIDERATION OF ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION TO THE APPOINTING PAGE 2 AUTHORITY OR HIS DESIGNEE TO SUBMIT AN ASSESSMENT BALLOT ON BEHALF OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT IN THE PROCEEDINGS TO FORM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0.2-R U1_Y 6, 2011 Article XIIID provides that a record owner proposed to be assessed may express such owner's support for or opposition to the levy of a proposed assessment against such owner's property by completing and submitting an assessment ballot. For property owned by a public entity, "record owner" means the representative of that public entity. Staff would recommend that assessment ballots be completed and submitted on behalf of the Fire Protection District supporting the levy of the proposed assessments against the FIRE Property for Fiscal Year 2011/12. If the Board of Directors desires to have the assessment ballots submitted for the FIRE Property as recommended, it is recommended that the Board of Directors adopt a resolution to designate the Appointing Authority or his designee to complete and submit assessment ballots on behalf of the Fire Protection District and that such resolution specify that such assessment ballots be completed to reflect the support by the Fire Protection District of the levy of the proposed assessments against the FIRE Property. Respectful) submitted, - Mike Be41 Fire Chief Attachment: Resolution P17 RESOLUTION NO. FPD 11- 0~7 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE APPOINTING AUTHORITY OR HIS DESIGNEE TO SUBMIT AN ASSESSMENT BALLOT ON BEHALF~OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT IN THE PROCEEDINGS TO FORM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2-R AND PROVIDING DIRECTION ON THE SUBMISSION OF SAID ASSESSMENT BALLOTS WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga (the "City"), acting under the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 (the "1972 Act"), Article XII ID of the Constitution of the State of California ("Article XIIID") and the Proposition 218 Omnibus Implementation Act ("Proposition 218"), (the 1972 Act, Article XIIID and Proposition 218 are collectively referred to as the "Assessment Law"), approved the commencement of procedures for the formation of Landscape Maintenance District No. 2-R ("LMD 2-R") to replace Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 and the levy of assessments within Landscape Maintenance District No. 2-R, so that property owners may approve increased funding for the maintenance and servicing of improvements; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of Section 4 of Article XIIID of the California Constitution ("Article XIIID"), the City retained the services of NBS to provide assessment engineering services pertaining to the proceedings to consider the formation of LMD 2-R, including but not limited to, the identification of those properties that will receive special benefit from the maintenance and servicing of the improvements; and WHEREAS,, NBS has determined that certain property owned by the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District (the "Fire Protection District")and located within the proposed boundaries of LMD 2-R will receive special benefits from the maintenance and servicing of the improvements; WHEREAS, such Fire Protection District property (the "FPD Property") is located at 12270 Firehouse Court and, pursuant to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 2-R Fiscal Year 2011/12 Engineer's Report dated June 2011 and- prepared and submitted by NBS (the "Engineer's Report") to the City Council, an assessment of $281.75 is proposed to be levied against the FPD Property for Fiscal Year 2011/12 (the "Proposed Assessment") to represent the special benefit to be received by the FPD Properties; and WHEREAS, the City Council has, pursuant to the Assessment Law, set a public hearing to be held on July 20, 2011 to consider the formation of LMD 2-R and the levy of assessments therein and directed the City Clerk to give notice of such public hearing, togetherwith assessment ballots pursuant to which the record owners of all properties proposed to be assessed may express their support for or their opposition to the proposed levy of assessments against their properties; and WHEREAS, the Board of Directors concurs that the Proposed Assessments represent the special benefit to be received by the FPD Property and has determined that it would be in the public interest for the. Fire Protection District to support the levy of the Proposed Assessment on the FPD Property. P18 NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District does hereby resolve, determine and order as follows: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2: That the Board of Directors hereby designates the Appointing Authority or his designee as the representative of the Fire Protection District for the purpose of completing and submitting an assessment ballot on behalf of the Fire Protection District pertaining to the Proposed Assessments applicable to the FPD Property and directs the Appointing Authority or his designee to complete the assessment ballots to indicate the support of the Fire Protection District to the levy of the Proposed Assessments against the FPD Property. SECTION 3: That this resolution shall become effective upon its adoption PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this _ day of July, 2011. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: L. Dennis Michael, President ATTEST: Janice C. Reynolds, Secretary I, JANICE C. REYNOLDS, SECRETARY of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, at a regular meeting of said Board held on the day of July 2011. Executed this day of July 2011 at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Janice C. Reynolds, Secretary CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P19 Agenda Check Register 6/8/2011 through 6/28/2011 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00310975 6/8/2011 ABLETRONICS 22.76 AP - 00310976 6/8/2011 ALEXANDER HAMILTON INSTITUTE INC. 26.50 AP - 00310977 6/8/2011 ALHS DANCER BOOSTERS 500.00 AP - 00310978 6/8/2011 ALHS SWIM BOOSTER CLUB 500.00 AP - 00310978 - 6/8/2011 ALHS SWIM BOOSTER CLUB ~ 20.00 AP - 00310979 6/8/2011 ALL CITY MANAGEMENT SERVICES INC. 21,989.40 AP - 00310980 6/8/2011 ALPHAGRAPHICS 499.98 AP - 00310981 6/8/2011 AMERICAN TRAINING RESOURCES INC 1,086.58 AP - 00310982 6/8/2011 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES 3.35 AP - 00310983 6/8/2011 ARAMBULA, RAQUEL 425.00 AP - 00310984 6/8/2011 ARBOR NURSERY PLUS 424.13 AP - 00310986 6/8/2011 ASCE RIVERSIDE 25.00 AP - 00310988 6/8/2011 BANKER, SARAH 140.00 AP - 00310989 6/8/2011 BEACON POINTE CONDOMINIUM 195.00 AP - 00310991 6/8/2011 BERLITZ 110.00 AP - 00310992 6/8/2011 BOPKO, CHRISTOPHER 57.24 AP - 00310993 6/8/2011 BOURLAND, PATRICIA 30.36 AP - 00310994 6/8/2011 BUTSKO UTILITY DESIGN INC. 3,118.12 AP - 00310995 6/8/2011 CALIFORNIA SHOPPING CART RETRIEVAL COP 65.00 AP - 00310997 6/8/2011 CASH, LEA MICHELLE 340.00 AP - 00310998 6/8/2011 CLIMATEC BUILDING TECHNOLOGIES GROUP 385.00 AP - 00310999 6/8/2011 CNOA 45.00 AP - 00311000 6/8/2011 CNOA 35.00 AP - 00311001 6/8/2011 CNOA 45.00 AP - 00311002 6/8/2011 CNOA 45.00 AP - 00311003 6/8/2011 COAST RECREATION INC 617.50 AP - 00311004 6/8/2011 COCKCROFT, EILEEN 500.00 AP - 00311005 6/8/2011 CONTRERAS, VANESSA 40.00 AP = 00311006 6/8/2011 COPIES & INK PRINTING INC. 728.75 AP - 00311007 6/8/2011 CRUZ, MARIA 90.00 AP - 00311008 6/8/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 2,035.99 AP - 00311008 6/8/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 140.50 AP - 00311008 6/8/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 73.60 AP - 00311008 6/8/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 311.75 AP - 00311008 6/8/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 667.27 AP - 00311008 6/8/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 224.17 AP - 00311008 6/8/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 73.60 AP - 00311008 6/8/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 73.60 AP - 00311008 6/8/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 610.26 AP - 00311008 6/8/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 160.58 AP - 00311008 6/8/2011. CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 261.89 AP - 00311008 6/8/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 162.65 AP - 00311008 6/8/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 82.91 AP - 00311008 6/8/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 827.77 AP - 00311008 6/8/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT ~ 55.20 AP - 00311008 6/8/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 141.93 AP - 00311008 6/8/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 10,191.15 AP - 00311008 6/8/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 184.62 AP - 00311008 6/8/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 253.19 AP - 00311008 6/8/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 133.33 AP - 00311009 6/8/2011 D AND K CONCRETE COMPANY 750.93 AP - 00311011 6/8/2011 DISCOVERY VILLIAGE HOA 315.00 AP - 00311012 6/8/2011 DREAM SHAPERS 525.00 AP - 00311013 6/8/2011 DREAM SHAPERS 275.00 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 1 Current Date: 06/30/201 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 07:15:1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 6/8/2011 through 6/28/2011 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00311014 6/8/2011 DYNASTY SCREEN PRINTING , 431.74 AP - 00311014 6/8/2011 DYNASTY SCREEN PRINTING 188.30 AP - 00311014 6/8/2011 DYNASTY SCREEN PRINTING 80.91 AP - 00311015 6/8/2011 ELLIS ENTERPRISES 220.00 AP - 00311015 6/8/2011 ELLIS ENTERPRISES 940.00 AP - 00311018 6/8/2011 FOREMOST SILKSCREEN AND EMBROIDERY 3,732.30 AP - 00311019 6/8/2011 GAMEZ, LENORE 65.00 AP - 00311020 6/8/2011 GARDNER; RODNEY 40.00 AP - 00311021 6/8/2011 GOLDSTAR ASPHALT PRODUCTS 3,973.73 AP - 00311022 6/8/2011 GOMEZ, ANGIE 170.00 AP - 00311023 6/8/2011 GOTHIC MOON PRODUCTIONS INC. 867.00 AP - 00311025 6/8/2011 GRAINGER 127.24 AP - 00311025 6/8/2011 GRAINGER 89.87 AP - 00311025 6/8/2011 GRAINGER 31.86 AP - 00311025 6/8/2011 GRAINGER 54.96 AP - 00311026 6/8/2011 GRANICUS INC 1,100.00 AP - 00311027 6/8/2011 GRAPHICS FACTORY PRINTING INC. 402.38 AP - 00311027 6/8/2011 GRAPHICS FACTORY PRINTING INC. 810.19 AP - 00311027 6/8/2011 GRAPHICS FACTORY PRINTING INC. 364.31 AP - 00311027 6/8/2011 GRAPHICS FACTORY PRINTING INC. 750.38 AP -'00311028 6/8/2011 GYROSCOPE INC 43,000.00 AP - 00311029 6/8/2011 HAMILTON, SHERRI 16.00 AP - 00311030 6/8/2011 HDS WHITE CAP CONSTRUCTION SUPPLY 472.10 AP - 00311030 6/8/2011 HDS WHITE CAP CONSTRUCTION SUPPLY 757.54 AP - 00311031 6/8/2011 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 329.73 AP - 00311032 6/8/2011 HOMESAFE INC 350.00 AP - 00311033 6/8/2011 HYDRO TEK SYSTEMS INC 777.58 AP - 00311033 6/8/2011 HYDRO TEK SYSTEMS INC 9,057.19 AP - 00311034 6/8/2011 I A A P 25.00 AP - 00311034 6/8/2011 I A A P 25.00 AP - 00311034 6/8/2011 I A A P 25.00 AP - 00311034 6/8/2011 I A A P 25.00 AP - 00311034 6/8/2011 I A A P 25.00 AP - 00311034 6/8/2011 I A A P 25.00 AP - 00311034 6/8/2011 I A A P 25.00 AP - 00311034 6/8/2011 I A A P ~ 25.00 AP - 00311034 6/8/2011 I A A P 25.00 AP - 00311034 6/8/2011 I A A P - 25.00 AP - 00311035 6/8/2011 INLAND EMPIRE WEEKLY 465.00 AP - 00311036 6/8/2011 INLAND FAIR HOUSING AND MEDIATION BOAT 964.18 AP - 00311036 6/8/2011 INLAND FAIR HOUSING AND MEDIATION BOAT 758.68 AP - 00311037 6/8/2011 INLAND PRESORT & MAILING SERVICES 67.51 AP - 00311037 6/8/2011 INLAND PRESORT & MAILING SERVICES 20.80 AP - 00311038 6/8/2011 IRON MOUNTAIN OSDP 1,821.52 AP - 00311039 6/8/2011 JONES AND MAYER, LAW OFFICES OF 1,029.50 AP - 00311040 6/8/2011 KC PRINTING & GRAPHICS 92.44 AP - 00311041 6/8/2011 KUSTOM IMPRINTS 618.34 AP - 00311041 6/8/2011 KUSTOM IMPRINTS 517.20 AP - 00311042 6/8/2011 LIEBERT CASSIDY WHITMORE 1,377.00 AP - 00311043 6/8/2011 MANELA, ROSIE 8.98 AP - 00311043 6/8/2011 MANELA, ROSIE 21.74 AP - 00311044 6/8/2011 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 5,511.22 AP - 00311044 6/8/2011 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 3,988.67 AP - 00311044 6/8/2011 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 2,111.08 P20 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 2 Current Date: 06/30/201 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 07:15:1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 6/8/2011 through 6/28/2011 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00311044 6/8/2011 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT 1NC 12,197.13 AP - 00311044 6/8/2011 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT 1NC 3,754.44 AP - 00311044 6/8/2011 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 304.52 AP - 00311044 6/8/2011 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 4,347.38 AP - 00311044 6/8/2011 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 398.29 AP - 00311044 6/8/2011 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 2,409.05 AP - 00311044 6/8/2011 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 136.73 AP - 00311044 6/8/2011 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 211.98 AP - 00311044 6/8/2011 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 1,212.49 AP - 00311044 6/8/2011 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 333.01 AP - 00311044 6/8/2011 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 1,987.03 AP - 00311044 6/8/2011 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 333.24 AP - 00311044 6/8/2011 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 141.57 AP - 00311044 6/8/2011 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 21,536.86 AP - 00311044 6/8/2011 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 10,068.56 AP - 00311044 6/8/2011 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 108.00 AP - 00311044 6/8/2011 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 108.00 AP - 00311044 6/8/2011 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL. ENT INC 108.00 AP - 00311044 6/8/201.1 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 108.00 AP - 00311044 6/8/2011 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 60.00 AP - 00311046 6/8/2011 MARTINEZ, VERONICA 200.00 AP - 00311047 6/8/2011 MATHESON TRI-GAS INC 49.37 AP - 00311048 6/8/2011 MIDDLE RIDGE INC 187.50 AP - 00311048 6/8/2011 MIDDLE RIDGE INC 875.00 AP - 00311049 6/8/2011 MIDWEST TAPE 20.99 AP - 00311049 6/8/2011 MIDWEST TAPE 125.96 AP - 00311049 6/8/2011 MIDWEST TAPE 27.99 AP - 00311049 6/8/2011 MIDWEST TAPE 164.95 AP - 0031 ] 049 6/8/2011 MIDWEST TAPE 244.40 AP - 00311049 6/8/2011 MIDWEST TAPE 69.96 AP - 00311049 6/8/2011 MIDWEST TAPE 61.97 AP - 00311049 6/8/2011 MIDWEST TAPE 135.30 AP - 00311050 6/8/2011 MOUNTAIN STATES WHOLESALE NURSERY 1,730.76 AP - 00311053 6/8/2011 NWOSU, LORETHA 20.40 AP - 00311054 6/8/2011 OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH CENTERS OF CALIFO 225.66 AP - 00311055 6/8/2011 OFFICE DEPOT 19.56 AP - 00311055 6/8/2011 OFFICE DEPOT 7.20 AP - 00311055 6/8/2011 OFFICE DEPOT 181.54 AP - 00311055 6/8/2011 OFFICE DEPOT 12.69 AP - 00311055 6/8/2011 OFFICE DEPOT 97.40 AP - 00311055 6/8/2011 OFFICE DEPOT 18.39 AP - 00311055 6/8/2011 OFFICE DEPOT 300.54 AP - 00311055 6/8/2011 OFFICE DEPOT 50.71 AP - 00311055 6/8/2011 OFFICE DEPOT 182.09 AP - 00311055 6/8/2011 OFFICE DEPOT 42.91 AP - 00311055 6/8/2011 OFFICE DEPOT 68.50 AP - 00311055 6/8/2011 OFFICE DEPOT 11.05 AP - 00311055 6/8/2011 OFFICE DEPOT 155.01 AP - 00311055 6/8/2011 OFFICE DEPOT 172.28 AP - 00311055 6/8/2011 OFFICE DEPOT 70.65 AP - 00311055 6/8/2011 OFFICE DEPOT- 76.88 AP - 00311055 6/8/2011 OFFICE DEPOT 8.86 AP - 00311055 6/8/2011 OFFICE DEPOT 252.93 AP - 00311055 6/8/2011 OFFICE DEPOT 45.54 P21 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 3 Current Date: 06/30/201 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 07:15:1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 6/8/2011 through 6/28/2011 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00311055 6/8/2011 OFFICE DEPOT 15.34 AP - 00311055 6/8/2011 OFFICE DEPOT . 2.84 AP - 00311055 6/8/2011 OFFICE DEPOT 2.84 AP - 00311055 6/8/2011 OFFICE DEPOT 94.40 AP - 00311055 6/8/2011 OFFICE DEPOT 30.36 AP - 00311055 6/8/2011 OFFICE DEPOT 6.50 AP -'00311056 6/8/2011 ONTARIO WINNELSON CO 55.22 AP - 00311056 6/8/2011 ONTARIO WINNELSON CO 668.51 AP - 00311056 6/8/2011 ONTARIO WINNELSON CO 28.96 AP - 00311056 6/8/2011 ONTARIO WINNELSON CO 54.38 AP - 00311057 6/8/2011 ORACLE USA INC 7,195.95 AP - 00311058 6/8/2011 ORTIZ, ALFREDO ROLANDO 175.00 AP - 00311058 6/8/2011 ORTIZ, ALFREDO ROLANDO 175.00 AP - 00311059 6/8/2011 PACIFIC MUNICIPAL CONSULTANTS 900.00 AP - 00311060 6/8/2011 PACIFIC TELEMANAGEMENT SERVICES 3,825.00 AP - 00311061 6/8/2011 PATHFINDER ORGANIZATIONAL EFFECTIVENI 3,700.00 AP - 00311063 6/8/2011 PENINSULA LIBRARY SYSTEM 1,000.00 AP - 00311064 6/8/2011 PEREZ, DOMII~tICK 750.00 AP - 00311066 6/8/2011 PITNEY BOWES ~ 208.80 AP - 00311067 6/8/2011 RANCHO CUCAMONGA FONTANA FAMILY YM 11,700.27 AP - 00311068 6/8/2011 RANDOM HOUSE INC 13.06 AP - 00311070 6/8/2011 REYES, HILDELITA 5.00 AP - 00311071 6/8/2011 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 99.00 AP - 00311071 6/8/2011 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 2,028.47 AP - 00311072 6/8/2011 RODRIGUEZ, EUGENIO 899.07 AP - 00311075 6/8/2011 ROSEBURROUGH TOOLS INC 759.73 AP - 00311077 6/8/2011 SIGMANET 242.51 AP - 00311077 6/8/2011 SIGMANET 1,787.91 AP - 00311078 6/8/2011 SIGN SHOP, THE 146.81 AP - 00311083 6/8/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 3,197.32 AP - 00311083 6/8/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 21.11 AP - 00311083 6/8/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 21.11 AP - 00311083 6/8/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 21.11 AP - 00311083 6/8/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON _ 23.36 AP - 00311083 6/8/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 72.63 AP - 00311083 6/8/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 21.90 AP - 00311083 6/8/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 21.90 AP - 00311083 6/8/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 21.65 AP - 00311083 6/8/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 68.61 AP - 00311083 6/8/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 77.12 AP - 00311083 6/8/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 74.35 AP - 00311083 6/8/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 40.80 AP - 00311083 6/8/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 28.09 AP - 00311083 6/8/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 178.37 AP - 00311083 6/8/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 4.78 AP - 00311083 6/8/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 4.79 AP - 00311083 6/8/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 21.11 AP - 00311083 6/8/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 21.26 AP - 00311083 6/8/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 199.15 AP - 00311083 6/8/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 21.65 AP - 00311083 6/8/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 21.90 AP - 00311083 6/8/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 50.77 AP - 00311083 6/8/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.18 AP - 00311083 6/8/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON __ 116.77 P22 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 4 Report: CK_AGENDA REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Current Date: 06/30/201 Time: 07:15:1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 6/8/2011 through 6/28/2011 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00311083 6/8/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 77.94 AP - 00311083 6/8/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 882.14 AP - 00311083 6/8/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 47.19 AP - 00311083 6/8/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.05 AP - 00311083 6/8/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 26.85 AP - 00311083 6/8/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 66.02 AP - 00311083 6/8/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA.EDISON 22.97 AP - 00311083 6/8/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 56.81 AP - 00311083 6/8/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 123.84 AP - 00311083 6/8/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 406.52 AP - 00311083 6/8/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.85 AP - 00311083 6/8/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 64.61 AP - 00311083 6/8/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 121.02 AP - 00311083 6/8/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 3,772.55 AP - 00311083 6/8/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 118.78 AP - 00311083 6/8/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 99.44 AP - 00311083 6/8/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 93.51 AP - 00311083 6/8/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 20.53 AP - 00311083 6/8/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 21.80 AP - 00311083 6/8/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 21.80 AP - 00311083 6/8/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 156.66 AP - 00311083 6/8/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 51.52 AP - 00311083 6/8/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 45.29 AP - 00311083 6/8/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 190.17 AP - 00311083 6/8/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 402.27 AP - 00311083 6/8/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 38.30 AP - 00311083 6/8/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 67.68 AP - 00311083 6/8/2011. SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 120.42 AP - 00311083 6/8/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 85.00 AP - 00311083 6/8/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 49.49 AP - 00311083 6/8/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.26 AP - 00311083 6/8/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 21.80 AP - 00311083 6/8/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 21.37 AP - 00311083 6/8/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 21.30 AP - 00311083 6/8/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 31.34 AP - 00311083 6/8/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.10 AP - 00311083 6/8/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 35.16 AP - 00311083 6/8/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 162.93 AP - 00311083. 6/8/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 46.20 AP - 00311083 6/8/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.03 AP - 00311083 6/8/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 79.91 AP - 00311083 6/8/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.46 AP :00311083 6/8/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.26 AP - 00311083 6/8/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.63 AP - 00311083 6/8/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 72.48 AP - 00311083 6/8/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 54.57 AP - 00311083 6/8/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 168.77 AP - 00311083 6/8/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 40.84 AP - 00311083 6/8/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.07 AP - 00311083 6/8/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 21.65 AP - 00311083 6/8/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 21.65 AP - 00311083 6/8/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.05 AP - 00311083 6/8/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.05 AP - 00311083 6/8/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON __ 21.90 P23 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 5 Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Current Date: 06/30/201 Time: 07:15:1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P24 Agenda Check Register 6/8/2011 through 6/28/2011 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00311083 6/8/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.05 AP - 00311083 6/8/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.39 AP - 00311083 6/8/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 21.90 AP - 00311083 6/8/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 21.90 AP - 00311083 6/8/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 21.11 AP - 00311083 6/8/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 57.83 AP - 00311083 6/8/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 140.88 AP - 00311083 6/8/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 43.42 AP - 00311083 6/8/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 21.11 AP - 00311083 6/8/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 65.20 AP - 00311083 ' 6/8/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 59.45 AP - 00311083 6/8/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 4,394.22 AP - 00311083 6/8/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 117.40 AP - 00311083 6/8/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.36 AP - 00311083 6/8/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 99.62 AP - 00311083 6/8/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 139.30 AP - 00311083 6/8/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 60.70 AP - 00311083 6/8/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 136.87 AP - 00311083 6/8/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 63.56 AP - 00311083 6/8/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON _ 21.11 AP - 00311083 6/8/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 21.11 AP - 00311083 6/8/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 21.90 AP - 00311083 6/8/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 21.80 AP - 00311083 6/8/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 113.54 AP - 00311083 6/8/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.53 AP - 00311083 6/8/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.26 AP - 00311083 6/8/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 65.68 AP - 00311083 6/8/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.26 AP - 00311083 6/8/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 61.02 AP - 00311083 6/8/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.96 AP - 00311083 6/8/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 21.84 AP - 00311083 6/8/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 21.84 AP - 00311083 6/8/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 7228 AP - 00311084 6/8/2011 SPANDEX USA 679.69 AP - 00311085 6/8/2011 SPARKLETTS 76.00 AP - 00311086 6/8/2011 SPOONFACTORY 420.00 AP - 00311087 6/8/2011 STOVER SEED COMPANY 1,379.25 AP - 00311087 6/8/2011 STOVER SEED COMPANY 400.00 AP - 00311087 6/8/2011 ' STOVER SEED COMPANY 200.00 AP - 00311088 6/8/2011 SUNSHINE GROWERS NURSERY INC 32.63 AP - 00311088 6/8/2011 SUNSHINE GROWERS NURSERY INC 108.75 AP - 00311090 6/8/2011 TANG, WAI KIT 120.00 AP - 00311092 6/8/2011 THEATRE AUTHORITY WEST INC 100.00 AP - 00311093 6/8/2011 THEATRE COMPANY, THE 87.00 AP - 00311094 6/8/2011 THERMAL COMBUSTION INNOVATORS INC 70.03 AP - 00311094 6/8/2011 THERMAL COMBUSTION INNOVATORS INC 84.95 AP - 00311094 6/8/2011 THERMAL COMBUSTION INNOVATORS INC $5.61 AP - 00311094 6/8/2011 THERMAL COMBUSTION INNOVATORS INC 139.49 AP - 00311094 6/8/2011 THERMAL COMBUSTION INNOVATORS INC 186.12 AP - 00311094 6/8/2011 THERMAL COMBUSTION INNOVATORS INC 139.84 AP - 00311095 6/8/2011 U S LEGAL SUPPORT INC 55.77 AP - 00311095 6/8/2011 U S LEGAL SUPPORT INC 56.73 AP - 00311097 6/8/2011 UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA TRUSTEE FOR P. 263.24 AP - 00311097 6/8/2011 UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA TRUSTEE FOR P, 3,027.17 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 6 Current Date: 06/30/201 Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 07:15:1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P25 Agenda Check ReEister 6/8/2011 through 6/28/2011 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00311098 6/8/2011 UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA TRUSTEE FOR P, 48,459.90 AP - 00311099 6/8/2011 UNITED SITE SERVICES OF CA INC 142.96 AP - 00311100 6/8/2011 VANDERHAWK CONSULTING LLC .1,900.80 AP - 00311100 6/8/2011 VANDERHAWK CONSULTING LLC 6,864.20 AP - 00311103 6/8/2011 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 475.03 AP - 00311103 6/8/2011 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 38.06 AP - 00311103 6/8/2011 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 751.67 AP - 00311103 6/8/2011 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 38.06 AP - 00311103 6/8/2011 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 35.61 AP - 00311103 6/8/2011 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 38.06 AP - 00311103 6/8/2011 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 40.29 AP - 00311103 6/8/2011 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 241.22 AP - 00311103 6/8/2011 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 22.55 AP - 00311103 6/8/2011 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 35.61 AP - 00311103 6/8/2011 VERIZON CALIFORNIA ~ 35.61 AP - 00311103 6/8/2011 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 38.06 AP - 00311103 6/8/2011 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 18.54 AP - 00311103 6/8/2011 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 38.06 AP - 00311103 6/8/2011 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 18.03 AP - 00311103 6/8/2011 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 38.06 AP - 00311103 6/8/2011 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 385.80 AP - 00311103 6/8/2011 VERIZON CALIFORNIA _ 38.06 AP - 00311103 6/8/2011 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 78.86 AP - 00311103 6/8/2011 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 73.99 AP - 00311103 6/8/2011 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 38.06 AP - 00311103 6/8/2011 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 36.89 AP - 00311103 6/8/2011 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 123.51 AP - 00311103 6/8/2011 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 364.18 AP - 00311103 6/8/2011 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 583.89 AP - 00311103 6/8/2011 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 206.84 AP - 00311103 6/8/2011 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 76.13 AP - 00311103 6/8/2011 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 36.89 AP - 0031.1103 6/8/2011 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 497.98 AP - 00311103 6/8/2011 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 36.89 AP - 00311103 6/8/2011 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 38.06 AP - 00311103 6/8/2011 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 76.86 AP - 00311103 6/8/2011 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 38.06 AP - 00311103 6/8/2011 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 38:06 AP - 00311103 6/8/2011 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 40.29 AP - 00311103 6/8/2011 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 56.09 AP - 00311103 6/8/2011 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 110.68 AP - 00311103 6/8/2011 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 20.14 AP - 00311103 6/8/2011 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 35.61 AP - 00311103 6/8/2011 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 94.66 AP - 00311103 6/8/2011 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 18.54 AP - 00311103 6/8/2011 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 38.06 AP - 00311103 6/8/2011 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 38.06 AP - 00311103 6/8/2011 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 38.06 AP - 00311103 6/8/2011 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 38.89 AP - 00311103 6/8/2011 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 144.49 AP - 00311103 6/8/2011 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 40.05 AP - 00311103 6/8/2011 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 185.84 AP - 00311103 6/8/2011 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 35.61 AP - 00311103 6/8/2011 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 35.61 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 7 Current Date: 06/30/201 Report: CK_AGENDA REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 07:15:1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P26 Agenda Check Register 6/8/2011 through 6/28/2011 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00311103 6/8/2011 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 18.54 AP - 00311103 6/8/2011 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 1,497.19 AP - 00311103 6/8/2011 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 18.54 AP - 00311103 6/8/2011 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 475.03 AP - 00311103 6/8/2011 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 76.13 AP - 00311104 6/8/2011 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 597.45 AP - 00311104 6/8/2011 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 190.36 AP - 00311105 6/8/2011 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 76.89 AP - 00311105 6/8/2011 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 355.01 AP - 00311105 6/8/2011 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 695.91 AP - 00311105 ' 6/8/2011 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 1,019.53 AP - 00311106 6/8/2011 WESTCOAST MEDIA 1,213.00 AP - 00311107 6/8/2011 WILLIAMS, MYRA 17.00 AP - 00311108 6/8/2011 WORD MILL PUBLISHING 725.00 AP - 00311109 6/8/2011 ZEE MEDICAL INC 943.06 AP - 00311109 6/8/2011 ZEE MEDICAL INC -271.86 AP - 00311109 6/8/2011 ZEE.MEDICAL INC 226.69 AP - 00311109 6/8/2011 ZEE MEDICAL INC 712.29 AP - 00311109 6/8/2011 ZEE MEDICAL INC 271.86 AP - 00311110 6/9/2011 ABC LOCKSMITHS 21.82 AP - 00311112 6/9/2011 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 121.15 AP - 00311113 6/9/2011 CALSENSE 1,581.49 AP - 00311113 6/9/2011 CALSENSE 1,581.49 AP - 00311115 6/9/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 412.48 AP - 00311115 6/9/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 253.39 AP - 00311115 6/9/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 2,136.22 AP - 00311115 6/9/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 55.95 AP - 00311115 6/9/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 55.20 AP - 00311115 6/9/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 255.44 AP - 00311115 6/9/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT - 55.20 AP - 00311115 6/9/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 392.79 AP - 00311115 6/9/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 73.60 AP - 00311115 6/9/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 617.82 AP - 00311115 6/9/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT ~ 220.81 AP - 00311115 .6/9/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 522.01 AP - 00311115 6/9/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 178.06 AP - 00311115 6/9/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 469.57 AP - 00311115 6/9/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 52.96 AP - 00311115 6/9/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 111.50 AP - 00311115 6/9/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 121.49 AP - 00311115 6/9/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 84.08 AP - 00311115 6/9/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 350.13 AP - 00311115 6/9/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 350.12 AP - 00311115 6/9/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 227.31 AP - 00311115 6/9/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 240.33 AP - 00311115 6/9/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,047.07 AP - 00311115 6/9/2011 CUCA1vIONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 813.41 AP - 00311115 6/9/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 73.60 AP - 00311115 6/9/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 8.10.87 AP - 00311115 6/9/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 623.65 AP - 00311115 6/9/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 228.88 AP - 00311115 6/9/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 610.67 AP - 00311115 6/9/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 953.62 AP - 00311115 6/9/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 864.40 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: - 8 Current Date: 06/30/201 Report: CK_AGENDA REG_PORTRAI T_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 07:15:1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 6/8/2011 through 6/28/2011 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00311115 6/9/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT .183.26 AP - 00311115 6/9/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 265.65 AP - 00311115 6/9/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 225.81 AP - 00311115 6/9/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 326.52 AP - 00311115 6/9/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 504.66 AP - 00311115 6/9/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 827.57 AP - 00311115 6/9/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 453.63 AP - 00311115 6/9/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 310.01 AP - 00311115 6/9/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 778.06 AP - 00311115 6/9/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 621.84 AP - 00311115 6/9/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 2,508.56 AP - 00311115 6/9/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 40.50 AP - 00311115 6/9/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 132.84 AP - 00311115 6/9/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 83.87 AP - 00311115 6/9/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 46.55 AP - 00311115 6/9/201.1 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,024.08 AP - 00311115 6/9/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 158.38 AP - 00311115 6/9/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 73.60 AP - 00311115 6/9/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,605.96 AP - 00311115 6/9/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 100.61 AP - 00311115 6/9/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 257.66 AP - 00311116 6/9/2011 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 203.45 AP - 00311117 6/9/2011 GOLF VENTURES WEST 33.45 AP - 00311118 6/9/2011 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO 1NC 446.69 AP - 00311118 6/9/2011 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO 1NC 100.00 AP - 00311119 6/9/2011 HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS INC 40.36 AP - 00311119 6/9/2011 HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS INC 220.55 AP - 00311119 6/9/2011 HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS INC 91.26 AP - 00311120 6/9/2011 HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS INC 25.81 AP - 00311121 6/9/2011 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 1,202.29 AP - 00311121 6/9/2011 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 3,253.74 AP - 00311121 6/9/2011 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 2,556.32 AP - 00311121 6/9/2011 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 14,406.68 AP - 00311121 6/9/2011 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 401.25 AP - 00311121 6/9/2011 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 20,018.54 AP - 00311121 6/9/2011 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 4,569.60 AP - 00311121 6/9/2011 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 4,928.90 AP - 00311121 6/9/2011 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 196.72 AP - 00311121 6/9/2011 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 1,453.51 AP - 00311122 6/15/2011 909 MAGAZINE 950.00 AP - 00311123 6/15/2011 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 10.00 AP - 00311123 6/15/2011 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 260.58 AP - 00311123 6/15/2011 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 10.00 AP - 00311123 6/15/2011 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 25.99 AP - 00311123 6/15/2011 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 104.52 AP - 00311123 6/15/2011 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 10.00 AP - 00311123 6/15/2011 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 46.61 AP - 00311123 6/15/2011 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 10.44 AP - 00311123 6/15/2011 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 10.00 AP - 00311123 6/15/2011 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 79.99 AP - 00311123 6/15/2011 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 20.00 AP - 00311123 6/15/2011 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 10.53 AP - 00311123 6/15/2011 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 873.71 AP - 00311123 6/15/2011 A AND R TIRE SERVICE - 10.53 P27 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 9 Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Current Date: 06/30/201 Time: 07:15:1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P28 Agenda Check Register 6/8/2011 through 6/28/2011 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00311123 6/15/2011 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 254.13 AP - 00311123 6/15/2011 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 746.41 AP - 00311123 6/15/2011 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 274.77 AP - 00311123 6/15/2011 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 10.53 AP - 00311123 6/15/2011 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 10.00 AP - 00311123 6/15/2011 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 142.25 AP - 00311124 6/15/2011 A&V SOFTBALL 2,325.00 AP - 00311125 6/15/2011 AA EQUIPMENT RENTALS CO INC 676.54 AP - 00311125 6/15/2011 AA EQUIPMENT RENTALS CO INC 235.08 AP - 00311126 6/15/2011 ABLETRONICS 75.23 AP - 00311127 6/15/2011 ADS PRODUCTIONS 150.00 AP - 00311128 6/15/2011 AEF SYSTEMS CONSULTING INC 525.00 AP - 00311129 6/15/2011 AGAPE EMPLOYMENT 682.00 AP - 00311129 6/15/2011 AGAPE EMPLOYMENT 682.00 AP - 00311129 6/15/2011 AGAPE EMPLOYMENT 255.80 AP - 00311129 6/15/2011 AGAPE EMPLOYMENT 12.79 AP - 00311129 6/15/2011 AGAPE EMPLOYMENT 682.00 AP - 00311129 6/15/2011 AGAPE EMPLOYMENT 511.50 AP - 00311130 6/15/2011 AGILITY FUEL SYSTEMS 1,196.25 AP - 00311131 6/15/2011 AIR & HOSE SOURCE INC. 8.81 AP - 00311133 6/15/2011 ALPHAGRAPHICS 91.35 AP - 00311133 6/15/2011 ALPHAGRAPHICS 34.81 AP - 00311133 6/15/2011 ALPHAGRAPHICS 45.68 AP - 00311133 6/15/2011 ALPHAGRAPHICS 45.67 AP - 00311136 6/15/2011 AMTECH ELEVATOR SERVICES 256.06 AP - 00311136 6/15/2011 AMTECH ELEVATOR SERVICES 220.24 AP - 00311136 6/15/2011 AMTECH ELEVATOR SERVICES 250.37 AP - 00311137 6/15/2011 ANTECH DIAGNOSTICS 1,027.89 AP - 00311137 6/15/2011 ANTECH DIAGNOSTICS 7.28 AP - 00311137 6/15/2011 ANTECH DIAGNOSTICS 12.29 AP - 00311138 6/15/2011 ANTHEM BLUE CROSS 145,779.08 AP - 00311139 6/15/2011 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES 3.35 AP - 00311140 6/15/2011 ASSI SECURITY 105.00 AP - 00311140 6/15/2011 ASSI SECURITY 105.00 AP - 00311140 6/15/2011 ASSI SECURITY 105.00 AP - 00311140 6/15/2011 ASSI SECURITY 105.00 AP - 00311140 6/15/2011 ASSI SECURITY 105.00 AP - 00311142 6/15/2011 BALDY FIRE AND SAFETY 265.23 _ AP - 00311143 6/15/2011 BAUTZ, JOHN 100.00 AP - 00311144 6/15/2011 BAYARDO, JUDITH 500.00 AP - 00311145 6/15/2011 BERNELL HYDRAULICS INC 45.09 AP - 00311146 6/15/2011 BERTINO AUTOMOTIVE SERVICE 983.58 AP - 00311146 6/15/2011 BERTINO AUTOMOTIVE SERVICE 161.76 AP - 00311147 6/15/2011 BLISS, REBECCA 20.82 AP - 00311149 6/15/2011 BUBALO CONSTRUCTION CO INC, MIKE 500.00 AP - 00311150 6/15/2011 BURBACK, REX 92.00 AP - 00311150 6/15/2011 BURBACK, REX 120.00 AP - 00311151 6/15/2011 BURKE ENGINEERING CO. 3,298.12 AP - 00311151 6/15/2011 BURKE ENGINEERING CO. 60.81 AP - 00311152 6/15/2011 BUTLER SCHEIN ANIMAL HEALTH SUPPLY -315.11 AP - 00311152 6/15/2011 BUTLER SCHEIN ANIMAL HEALTH SUPPLY 13.11 AP - 00311152 6/15/201 I BUTLER SCHEIN ANIMAL HEALTH SUPPLY 33.32 AP - 00311152 6/15/2011 BUTLER SCHEIN ANIMAL HEALTH SUPPLY 11.40 AP - 00311.152 6/15/2011 BUTLER SCHEIN ANIMAL HEALTH SUPPLY 917.63 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 10 Current Date: 06/30/201 Report: CK_AGENDA REG_PORTRAI T_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 07:15:1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 6/8/2011 through 6/28/2011 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00311152 6/15/2011 BUTLER SCHEIN ANIMAL HEALTH SUPPLY 171.83 AP - 00311153 6/15/2011 BUTSKO UTILITY DESIGN INC. 3,187.00 AP - 00311155 6/15/2011 CAL-STATE RENT A FENCE INC 1,641.50 AP - 00311155 6/15/2011 CAL-STATE RENT A FENCE INC 3,897.50 AP - 00311157 6/15/2011 CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE TAX BOARD 25.00 AP - 00311158 6/15/2011 CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE TAX BOARD 50.00 AP - 00311159 6/15/2011 CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE TAX BOARD 200.00 AP - 00311160 6/15/2011 CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE TAX BOARD 50.00 AP - 00311161 6/15/2011 CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE TAX BOARD 483.43 AP - 00311162 6/15/2011 CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE TAX BOARD 294.29 AP - 00311163 6/15/2011 CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE TAX BOARD 111.93 AP - 00311164 6/15/2011 CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE TAX BOARD 150.00 AP - 00311165 6/15/2011 CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE TAX BOARD 100.00 AP - 00311167 6/15/2011 CAPITOL BUILDERS HARDWARE INC. 248.32 AP - 00311168 6/15/2011 CARDINAL INDUSTRIAL FINISHES 142.35 AP - 00311169 6/15/2011 CARE FOR THE CHILDREN 250.00 AP - 00311172 6/15/2011 CELLEBRITE USA 8,084.99 AP - 00311173 6/15/2011 CERVANTES, LINDA 125.00 AP - 00311174 6/15/2011 CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS 219.98 AP - 00311175 6/15/2011 CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT DIVISION 175.00 AP - 00311176 6/15/2011 CHURCH OF CHRIST OF CHINO 330.00 AP - 00311177 6/15/2011 CITY CENTER BUILDING COMMERCIAL PROPE ~ 187.50 AP - 00311178 6/15/2011 CITY RENTALS 74.80 AP - 00311179 6/15/2011 CLABBY, SANDRA ~ 1,000.00 AP - 00311180 6/15/2011 CLARKE PLUMBING SPECIALTIES INC. 638.76 AP - 00311180 6/15/2011 CLARKE PLUMBING SPECIALTIES INC. 2,429.00 AP - 00311181 6/15/2011 CLASSE PARTY RENTALS 748.44 AP - 00311182 6/15/2011 CLEARWATER GRAPHICS 4,929.64 AP - 00311183 6/15/2011 CONTINENTAL AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPf 103.98 AP - 00311183 6/15/2011 CONTINENTAL AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPS 16.39 AP - 00311186 6/15/2011 CYCLERY USA INC. 84.36 AP - 00311186 6/15/2011 CYCLERY USA INC. 39.13 AP - 00311187 6/15/2011 D & D SERVICES INC. 400.00 AP - 00311188 6/15/2011 D 3 EQUIPMENT 12.16 AP - 00311189 6/15/2011 DAIRY QUEEN 30.51 AP - 00311191 6/15/2011 DAVID TURCH AND ASSOCIATES 8,000.00 AP - 00311192 6/15/2011 DE CASTRO, RHOEL 40.00 AP - 00311193 6/15/2011 DEALER ALTERNATIVE SOLUTIONS 459.16 AP - 00311194 6/15/2011 DELTA DENTAL 38,733.03 AP - 00311196 6/15/2011 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 1,875.00 AP - 00311196 6/15/2011 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 2,289.00 AP - 00311196 6/15/2011 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 736.00 AP - 00311196 6/15/2011 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 512.00 AP - 00311197 6/15/2011 DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES 18.00 AP - 00311198 6/15/2011 DUMBELL MAN FITNESS EQUIPMENT, THE 176.69 AP - 00311198 6/15/2011 DUMBELL MAN FITNESS EQUIPMENT, THE 592.92 AP - 00311198 6/15/2011 DUMBELL MAN FITNESS EQUIPMENT, THE 786.95 AP - 00311199 6/15/2011 DURKEL, CAROL 4.98 AP - 00311199 6/15/2011 DURKEL, CAROL 89.00 AP - 00311200 6/15/2011 EASY TO GET WIRELESS 291.00 AP - 00311201 6/15/2011 ELIFEGUARD INC. 2,137.72 AP - 00311201 6/15/2011 ELIFEGUARD INC. 430.00 AP - 00311201 6/15/2011 ELIFEGUARD INC. 115.95 AP - 00311201 6/15/2011 ELIFEGUARD INC. 34.92 P29 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 11 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Current Date: 06/30/201 Time: 07:15:1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 6/8/2011 through 6/28/2011 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00311201 6/15/2011 ELIFEGUARD INC. ~ 29.38 AP - 00311201 6/15/2011 ELIFEGUARD INC. 577.30 AP - 00311203 6/15/2011 ENTERSECT CORP 1,259.40 AP - 00311204 6/15/2011 EXCLUSIVE EMAGES 19.50 AP - 00311205 6/1S/2011 EXPRESS BRAKE SUPPLY 30.60 AP - 00311205 6/15/2011 EXPRESS BRAKE SUPPLY 277.78 AP - 00311206 6/15/2011 FENCE CRAFT OF UPLAND INC 1,096.16 AP - 00311207 6/15/2011 FLEET SERVICES INC. 181.90 AP - 00311208 6/15/2011 FONTANA, CITY OF 20.00 AP - 00311209 6/15/2011 FOOTHILL FAMILY SHELTER 415.00 AP - 00311210 6/15/2011 FORBES 10.00 AP - 00311211 6/15/2011 FORD OF UPLAND INC 36.94 AP - 00311211 6/15/2011 FORD OF UPLAND INC 36.94 AP - 00311211 6/15/2011 FORD OF UPLAND INC 90.00 AP - 00311211 6/15/2011 FORD OF UPLAND INC 32.88 AP - 00311212 6/15/2011 FRAZEE PAINT CENTER 219.02 AP - 00311212 6/15/2011 FRAZEE PAINT CENTER 120.89 AP - 00311213 611 S/2011 GABRIEL, DEBRA 19.60 AP -X00311214 6/15/2011 GOLDSTAR ASPHALT PRODUCTS 1,022.46 AP - 00311214 6/15/2011 GOLDSTAR ASPHALT PRODUCTS 2,000.00 AP - 00311215 6/1S/2011 GRAINGER 448.14 AP - 00311215 6/15/2011 GRAINGER 135.00 AP - 00311215 6/15/2011 GRAINGER 212.79 AP - 00311215 6/15/2011 GRAINGER 26.75 AP - 00311215 6/15/2011 GRAINGER 301.77 AP - 00311215. 6/15/2011 GRAINGER 24.48 AP - 00311215 6/15/2011 GRAINGER 104.16 AP - 00311215 6/1S/2011 GRAINGER 25.23 AP - 00311216 6/15/2011 GRAVES & KING LLP 367.50 AP - 00311216 6/15/2011 GRAVES & KING LLP 245.00 AP - 00311217 6/15/2011 GUIDANCE SOFTWARE INC 4,350.00 AP - 00311218 6/15/2011 HAAKER EQUIPMENT CO 434.89 AP - 00311218 6/15/2011 HAAKER EQUIPMENT CO 12.00 AP - 00311219 6/15/2011 HARBOUR, CAROL 964.00 AP - 00311220 6/15/2011 HEALTH SCAN IMAGING 200.00 AP - 00311221 6/15/2011 HERMANN, JOHN 30.00 AP - 00311222 6/15/2011 HILLS PET NUTRITION SALES INC 806.93 AP - 00311222 6/15/2011 HILLS PET NUTRITION SALES INC 540.98 AP - 00311223 6/15/2011 HOGAN, JULIA 24.27 AP - 00311223 6/15/2011 HOGAN, JULIA 64.26 AP - 00311223. 6/15/2011 HOGAN, JULIA 9.40 AP - 00311224 6/1S/2011 HOGLE-IRELAND 9,062.80 AP - 00311224 6/15/2011 HOGLE-IRELAND. 7,745.82 AP - 00311225 6/1 S/2011 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 114.83 AP - 00311225 6/15/2011 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 336.64 AP - 00311226 6/15/2011 HOSE MAN INC 10.03 AP - 00311227 6/15/2011 HOT SHOTS ATHLETIC APPAREL INC. 10,935.27 AP - 00311228 6/15/2011 HOUSE OF RUTH 169.40 AP - 00311229 6/15/2011 HSBC BUSINESS SOLUTIONS 200.09 AP - 00311229 6/15/2011 HSBC BUSINESS SOLUTIONS 12.78 AP - 00311229 6/15/2011 HSBC BUSINESS SOLUTIONS 185.50 AP - 00311229 6/15/2011 HSBC BUSINESS SOLUTIONS 108.35 AP - 00311229 6/15/2011 HSBC BUSINESS SOLUTIONS 206.61 AP - 00311229 6/15/2011 HSBC BUSINESS SOLUTIONS 31.56 P30 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 12 Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Current Date: 06/30/201 Time: 07:1 S :1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 6/8/2011 through 6/28/2011 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00311229 6/15/2011 HSBC BUSINESS SOLUTIONS 21.97 AP - 00311229 6/15/2011 HSBC BUSINESS SOLUTIONS 45.59 AP - 00311229 6/15/2011 HSBC BUSINESS SOLUTIONS 204.36 AP - 00311229 6/15/2011 HSBC BUSINESS SOLUTIONS 53.97 AP - 00311229 6/15/2011 HSBC BUSINESS SOLUTIONS 48.73 AP - 00311229 6/15/2011 HSBC BUSINESS SOLUTIONS 74.18 AP - 00311229 6/15/2011 HSBC BUSINESS SOLUTIONS 89.16 AP - 00311229 6/15/2011 HSBC BUSINESS SOLUTIONS 15.98 AP - 00311230 6/15/2011 HUMANE SOCIETY OF SAN BERNARDINO VAL] 325.00 AP - 00311231 6/15/2011 I A A P 128.00 AP - 00311232 6/15/2011 ICC 350.00 AP - 00311233 6/15/2011 INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY CO INC 379.76 AP - 00311234 6/15/2011 INLAND EMPIRE TOURS AND TRANSPORTATIC 1,855.00 AP - 00311237 6/15/2011 INLAND VALLEY EMERGENCY PET CLINIC 105.00 AP - 00311238 6/15/2011 INPRO CORPORATION 3,382.14 AP - 00311239 6/15/2011 INSIGHT PUBLIC SECTOR 4,393.17 AP - 00311239 6/15/2011 INSIGHT PUBLIC SECTOR 2,232.00 AP - 00311240 6/15/2011 INTEGRITY DOOR & HARDWARE INC 230.83 AP - 00311241 6/15/2011 INTERBRAND DESIGN C/O BURNHAM NATIOI~P 274.00 AP - 00311243 6/15/2011 INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE 75.00 AP - 00311245 6/15/2011 JDC INC 8,176.00 AP - 00311246 6/15/2011 JIM GILMAN AND THE ASSOCIATES 400.00 AP - 00311247 6/15/2011 JOHN DEERE LANDSCAPES 1,294.66 AP - 00311248 6/15/2011 JONES AND MAYER, LAW OFFICES OF 957.60 AP - 00311249 6/15/2011 K K WOODWORKING 119.60 AP - 00311249 6/15/2011 K K WOODWORKING 34.76 AP - 00311250 6/15/2011 K. HOVNANIAN HOMES 706.00 AP - 00311250 6/15/2011 K. HOVNANIAN HOMES 1,333.63 AP - 00311251 6/15/2011 KARATSU, ROBERT 119.00 AP - 00311252 6/15/2011 KELLEY'S UNDERGROUND CONSTRUCTION 500.00 AP - 00311253 6/15/2011 KENS SPORTING GOODS 3,977.48 AP - 00311255 6/15/2011 LASER TECHNOLOGY INC 379.63 AP - 00311256 6/15/2011 LEE, NANNIE 100.00 AP - 00311257 6/15/2011 LITTLE BEAR PRODUCTIONS 600.00 AP - 00311257 6/15/2011 LITTLE BEAR PRODUCTIONS 225.00 AP - 00311257 6/15/2011 LITTLE BEAR PRODUCTIONS 595.00 AP - 00311257 6/15/2011 LITTLE BEAR PRODUCTIONS 485.00 AP - 00311257 6/15/2011 LITTLE BEAR PRODUCTIONS 995.00 AP - 00311257 6/15/2011 LITTLE BEAR PRODUCTIONS 500.00 AP - 00311258 6/15/2011 LOPEZ, CRISTINA 15.00 AP - 00311259 6/15/2011 LOS ANGELES NEWSPAPER GROUP 957.50 AP - 00311259 6/15/2011 LOS ANGELES NEWSPAPER GROUP 781.75 AP - 00311261 6/15/2011 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 27.27 AP - 00311261 6/15/2011 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 28.23 AP - 00311261 6/15/2011 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 44.10 AP - 00311261 6/15/2011 LOWES COMPANIES INC. -119.63 AP - 00311261 6/15/2011 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 90.09 AP - 00311261 6/15/2011 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 227.77 AP - 00311261 6/15/2011 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 151.68 AP - 00311261 6/15/2011 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 62.17 AP - 00311261 6/15/2011 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 56.42 AP - 00311261 6/15/2011 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 44.45 AP -00311261 6/15/2011 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 10.01 AP - 00311261 6/15/2011 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 64.20 P31 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 13 Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Current Date: 06/30/201 Time: 07:15:1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 6/8/2011 through 6/28/2011 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00311261 6/15/2011 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 15.86 AP - 00311261 6/15/2011 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 195.67 AP - 00311261 6/15/2011 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 65.46 AP - 00311261 6/15/2011 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 105.01 AP - 00311261 6/15/2011 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 18.66 AP - 00311261 6/15/2011 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 23.86 AP - 00311261 6/15/2011 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 116.30 AP - 00311261 6/15/2011 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 2.59 AP - 00311261 6/15/2011 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 0.90 AP - 00311261 6/15/2011 LOWES COMPANIES INC. -2.59 AP - 00311261 6/15/2011 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 110.86 AP - 00311261 6/15/2011 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 247.86 AP - 00311261 6/15/2011 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 100.91 AP - 00311261 6/15/2011 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 43.28 AP - 00311261 6/15/2011 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 23.83 AP - 00311261 6/15/2011 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 221.61 AP - 00311261 6/15/2011 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 26.93 AP - 00311261 6/15/2011 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 35.60 AP - 00311261 6/15/2011 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 11.75 AP - 00311261 6/15/2011 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 196.96 AP - 00311261 6/15/2011 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 95.58 AP - 00311261 6/15/2011 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 56.48 AP - 00311261 6/15/2011 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 30.63 AP - 00311261 6/15/2011 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 160.60 AP - 00311261 6/15/2011 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 57.29 AP - 00311261 6/15/2011 LOWES COMPANIE& INC. 87.13 AP - 00311261 6/15/2011 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 149.21 AP - 00311261 6/15/2011 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 29.36 AP - 00311261 6/15/2011 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 22.05 AP - 00311261 6/15/2011 LOWES COMPANIES INC. -97.84 AP - 00311261 6/15/2011 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 14.74 AP - 00311261 6/15/2011 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 36.65 AP - 00311261 6/15/2011 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 18.20 AP - 00311261 6/15/2011 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 12.83 AP - 00311261 6/15/2011 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 104.35 AP - 00311261 6/15/2011 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 29.20 AP - 00311261 6/15/2011 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 21.53 AP - 00311261 6/15/2011 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 12.14 AP - 00311261 6/15/2011 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 123.47 AP - 00311261 6/15/2011 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 59.60 AP - 00311261 6/15/2011 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 65.97 AP - 00311261 6/15/2011 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 12.38 AP - 00311263 6/15/2011 MANERI SIGN COMPANY INC 16,018.42 AP - 00311263 6/15/2011 MANERI SIGN COMPANY INC -1,601.84 AP - 00311264 6/15/2011 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 2,321.20 AP - 00311264 6/15/2011 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 380.21 AP - 00311264 6/15/2011 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 175.34 AP - 00311264 6/15/2011 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 15,998.13 AP - 00311264 6/15/2011 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 6,578.73 AP - 00311264 6/15/2011 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 3,022.47 AP - 00311264 6/15/2011 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 5,059.09 AP - 00311264 6/15/2011 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 822.67 AP - 00311264 6/15/2011 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 696.51 AP - 00311264 6/15/2011 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 870.75 P32 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 14 Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Current Date: 06/30/201 Time: 07:15:1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 6/8/2011 through 6/28/2011 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00311264 6/15/2011 'MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 2,737.36 AP - 00311264 6/15/2011 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 1,581.61 AP - 00311265 6/15/2011 MARTINEZ UNION SERVICE 45.00 AP - 00311265 6/15/2011 MARTINEZ UNION SERVICE 210.00 AP - 00311266 6/15/2011 MATERIAL SALES UNLIMITED 958.67 AP - 00311267 6/15/2011 MAXIMUS INC 6,000.00 AP - 00311268 6/15/2011 MCI 34.83 AP - 00311269 6/15/2011 MCMASTER CARR SUPPLY COMPANY 281.98 AP - 00311270 6/15/2011 METROPCS CALIFORNIA LLC 1,238.00 AP - 00311271 6/15/2011 MIDDLE RIDGE INC 812.50 AP - 00311272 6/15/2011 MIDWEST TAPE 29.99 AP - 00311272 6/15/2011 MIDWEST TAPE 28.98 AP - 00311272 6/15/2011 MIDWEST TAPE 41.57 AP - 00311272 6/15/2011 MIDWEST TAPE 39.17 AP - 00311272 6/15/2011 MIDWEST TAPE 287.85 AP - 00311272 6/15/2011 MIDWEST TAPE 298.06 AP - 00311272 6/15/2011 MIDWEST TAPE 259.84 AP - 00311272 6/15/2011 MIDWEST TAPE 178.29 AP - 00311272 6/15/2011 MIDWEST TAPE 61.55 AP - 00311272 6/15/2011 MIDWEST TAPE 49.56 AP - 00311272 6/15/2011 MIDWEST TAPE 24.99 AP - 00311272 6/15/2011 MIDWEST TAPE 24.99 AP = 00311272 6/15/2011 MIDWEST TAPE 46.36 AP - 00311272 6/15/2011 MIDWEST TAPE 22.38 AP - 00311272 6/15/2011 MIDWEST TAPE 400.48 AP - 00311272 6/15/2011 MIDWEST TAPE 362.92 AP - 00311272 6/15/2011 MIDWEST TAPE 42.17 AP - 00311272 6/15/2011 MIDWEST TAPE 187.95 AP - 00311272 6/15/2011 MIDWEST TAPE 69.98 AP - 00311272 6/15/2011 MIDWEST TAPE 267.90 'AP - 00311272 6/15/2011 MIDWEST TAPE 115.95 AP - 00311273 6/15/2011 MIJAC ALARM COMPANY 102.00 AP - 00311274 6/15/2011 MILANES, YIKCIA 562.50 AP - 00311274 6/15/2011 MILANES, YIKCIA 525.00 AP - 00311274 6/15/2011 MILANES, YIKCIA 100.00 AP - 00311274 6/15/2011 MILANES, YIKCIA 50.00 AP - 00311275 6/15/2011 MOUNTAIN VIEW SMALL ENG REPAIR 1,293.04 AP - 00311275 6/15/2011 MOUNTAIN VIEW SMALL ENG REPAIR 162.85 AP - 00311275 6/15/2011 MOUNTAIN VIEW SMALL ENG REPAIR 1,172.33 AP - 00311276 6/15/2011 MUTO, LOUIS V. 500.00 AP - 00311277 6/15/2011 MWI VETERINARY SUPPLY 361.32 AP - 00311277 6/15/2011 MWI VETERINARY SUPPLY 132.24 AP - 00311277 6/15/2011 MWI VETERINARY SUPPLY 17.18 AP - 00311277 6/15/2011 MWI VETERINARY SUPPLY 1,397.82 AP - 00311277 6/15/2011 MWI VETERINARY SUPPLY 18.47 AP - 00311277 6/15/201.1 MWI VETERINARY SUPPLY 738.63 AP - 00311277 6/15/2011 MWI VETERINARY SUPPLY 782.04 AP - 00311278 6/15/2011 NAPA AUTO PARTS 463.89 AP - 00311278 6/15/2011 NAPA AUTO PARTS 137.61 AP - 00311278 6/15/2011 NAPA AUTO PARTS 24.56 AP - 00311282 6/15/2011 NORTHTOWN HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORP. 1,000.00 AP - 00311283 6/15/2011 NOVARTIS ANIMAL HEALTH US INC 546.74 AP - 00311283 6/15/2011 NOVARTIS ANIMAL HEALTH US INC 354.79 AP - 00311283 6/15/2011 NOVARTIS ANIMAL HEALTH US INC 188.92 P33 User:, VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 15 Current Date: 06/30/201 Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - GK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 07:15:1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 6/8/2011. through 6/28/2011 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount P34 AP - 00311285 6/15/2011 OCLC INC 46.39 AP - 00311286 6/15/2011 OFFICE DEPOT 5.84 AP - 00311286 6/15/2011 OFFICE DEPOT 36.50 AP - 00311286 6/15/2011 OFFICE DEPOT 25.57 AP - 00311286 6/15/2011 OFFICE DEPOT 310.02 AP - 00311286 6/15/2011 OFFICE DEPOT -300.54 AP - 00311286 6/15/2011 OFFICE DEPOT 289.05 AP - 00311286 6/15/201 I OFFICE DEPOT 43.20 AP - 00311286 6/15/2011 OFFICE DEPOT 29.78 AP - 00311286 6/15/2011 OFFICE DEPOT .282.79 AP - 00311286 6/15/2011 OFFICE DEPOT 61.28 AP - 00311286 6/15/2011 OFFICE DEPOT 45.83 AP - 00311286 6/15/2011 OFFICE DEPOT 592.55 AP - 00311286 6/15/2011 OFFICE DEPOT 181.60 AP - 00311286 6/15/2011 OFFICE DEPOT 67.44 AP - 00311286 6/15/2011 OFFICE DEPOT 29.07' AP :00311286 6/15/2011 OFFICE DEPOT 489.80 AP - 00311286 6/15/2011 OFFICE DEPOT 107.63 AP - 00311286 6/15/2011 OFFICE DEPOT 335.86 AP - 00311286 6/15/2011 OFFICE DEPOT 99.43 AP - 00311286 6/15/2011 OFFICE DEPOT 39.15 AP - 00311286 6/15/2011 OFFICE DEPOT 20.65 AP - 00311286 6/15/2011 OFFICE DEPOT 236.92 AP - 00311286 6/15/2011 OFFICE DEPOT 70.65 AP - 00311286 6/15/2011 OFFICE DEPOT 70.65 AP - 00311286 6/15/2011 OFFICE DEPOT 48.39 AP - 00311286 6/15/2011 OFFICE DEPOT 27.98 AP - 00311286 6/15/2011 OFFICE DEPOT 74.72 AP - 00311286 6/15/2011 OFFICE DEPOT 27.84 AP - 00311286 6/15/2011 OFFICE DEPOT 100.10 AP - 00311286 6/15/2011 OFFICE DEPOT 5.84 . AP - 00311286 6/15/2011 OFFICE DEPOT 75.27 AP - 00311288 6/15/2011 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 10.86 AP - 00311288 6/15/2011 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 14.14 AP - 00311288 6/15/2011 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE -1.41 AP - 00311288 6/15/2011 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 26.25 AP - 00311288 6/15/2011 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 79,04 AP - 00311288 6/15/2011 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 32.56 AP - 00311288 6/15/2011 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 24.75 AP - 00311288 6/15/2011 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE ~ 133.70 AP - 00311288 6/15/2011 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 45.54 AP - 00311288 6/15/2011 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 82.55 AP - 00311288 6/15/2011 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 16.29 AP - 00311288 6/15/2011 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 4.33 AP - 00311288 6/15/2011 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 45.64 AP - 00311288 6/15/2011 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 42.40 AP - 00311288 6/15/2011 .ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 143.82 AP - 00311288 6/15/2011 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 5.10 AP - 00311288 6/15/2011 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 48.90 AP - 00311288 6/15/2011 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 206.92 AP - 00311288 6/15/2011 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 201.16 AP - 00311288 6/15/2011 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 18.88 AP - 00311288 6/15/2011 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 26.09 AP - 00311288 6/15/2011 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 32.12 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 16 Report: CK_AGENDA REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Current Date: 06/30/201 Time: 07:15:1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P35 Agenda Check Register 6/8/2011 through 6/28/2011 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00311288 6/15/2011 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 84.76 AP - 00311288 6/15/2011 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 18.18 AP - 00311288 6/15/2011 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 45.22 AP - 00311288 6/15/2011 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 18.48 AP - 00311288 6/15/2011 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 4.11 AP - 00311289 6/15/2011 ORKIN PEST CONTROL 1,566.46 AP - 00311290 6/15/2011 PACIFIC MUNICIPAL CONSULTANTS 21,518.75 AP - 00311291 6/15/2011 PAL CAMPAIGN 50.00 AP - 00311292 6/15/2011 PATCHETT & ASSOCIATES 2,590.00 AP - 00311293 6/15/2011 PATTERSON BUILDERS 1,000.00 AP - 00311294 6/15/2011 PENNY PLUMBING 221.13 AP - 00311295 6/15/2011 PITTENGER, CHRISTINA 338.87 AP - 00311296 6/15/2011 PORTER, BOB 1,496.50 AP - 00311296 6/15/2011 PORTER, BOB 3.06 AP - 00311297 6/15/2011 PRE-PAID LEGAL SERVICES INC 168.48 AP - 00311297 6/15/2011 PRE-PAID LEGAL SERVICES INC 11.40 AP - 00311298 6/15/2011 PRIDE LAUNDRY SYSTEMS INC 199.50 AP - 00311299 6/15/2011 PRIETO, DIEGO .120.00 AP - 00311300 6/15/2011 PROMOTIONS TEES & MORE 3,642.41 AP - 00311300 6/15/2011 PROMOTIONS TEES & MORE 4,469.35 AP - 00311301 6/15/2011 PYRO SPECTACULARS INC 15,000.00 AP - 00311302 6/15/2011 Q T E NORTH AMERICA INC 96.61 AP - 00311303 6/15/2011 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 34.94 AP - 00311303 6/15/2011 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 109.00 AP - 00311303 6/15/2011 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 566.88 AP - 00311303 6/15/2011 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 208.13 _ AP - 00311303 6/15/2011 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 234.14 AP - 00311303 6/15/2011 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 131.30 . AP - 00311303 6/15/2011 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 210.81 AP' - 00311303 6/15/2011 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 70.00 AP - 00311303 6/15/2011 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 37.76 AP - 00311303 6/15/2011 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 391.20 AP - 00311303 6/15/2011 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 207.50 AP - 00311303 6/15/2011 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 37.54 AP - 00311303 6/15/2011 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 449:90 AP - 00311303 6/15/2011 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 264.82 AP - 00311303 6/15/2011 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 357.84 AP - 00311303 6/15/2011 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 225.63 AP - 00311303 6/15/2011 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 496.86 AP - 00311303 6/15/2011 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 681.33 AP - 00311303 6/15/2011 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 805.24 AP - 00311303 6/15/2011 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 220.41 AP - 00311303 6/15/2011 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 37.54 AP - 00311303 6/15/2011 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 32.35 AP - 00311303 6/15/2011 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 255.15 AP - 00311304 6/15/2011 R&H THEATRICALS 101.02 AP - 00311305 6/15/2011 RAGAN COMMUNICATIONS 89.00 AP - 00311306 6/15/2011 RAINES, AMY M 325.00 AP - 00311306 6/15/2011 RAINES, AMY M 300.00 AP - 00311306 6/15/2011 RAINES, AMY M 383.15 AP - 00311306 6/15/2011 RAINES, AMY M 66.85 AP - 00311308 6/15/2011 RAYBALLOONS 121.49 AP - 00311309 6/15/2011 RCPFA 9,290.31 AP - 00311310 6/15/2011 RECORDED.BOOKS LLC 8.64_ User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 17 V ~ Current Date: 06/30/201 Report: CK_AGENDA REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 07:15:1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P36 Agenda Check Register 6/8/2011 through 6/28/2011 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00311311 6/15/2011 REED SMITH LLP 205.50 AP - 00311312 6/15/2011 REPUBLIC ITS 2,101.00 AP - 00311312 6/15/2011 REPUBLIC ITS 12,104.00 AP - 00311312 6/15/2011 REPUBLIC ITS 5,051.31 AP - 00311312 6/15/2011 REPUBLIC ITS 13,815.09 AP - 00311312 6/15/2011 REPUBLIC ITS 6,078.59 AP - 00311312 6/15/2011 REPUBLIC ITS 12,104.00 AP -.00311313 6/15/2011 ROADRUNNER PHARMACY 487.76 AP - 00311313 6/15/2011 ROADRUNNER PHARMACY 423.02 AP - 00311314 6/15/2011 ROBLES, RAUL P 75.00 AP - 00311314 6/15/2011 ROBLES, RAUL P 75.00 AP - 00311314 6/15/2011 ROBLES, RAUL P 135.00 AP - 00311314 6/15/2011 ROBLES, RAUL P 75.00 AP - 00311314 6/15/2011 ROBLES, RAUL P 75.00 AP - 00311316 6/15/2011 RODRIGUEZ, EUGENIO 183.70 AP - 00311316 6/15/2011 RODRIGUEZ, EUGENIO 79.50 AP - 00311317 6/15/2011 ROUCH, PETER A 75.00 AP -00311318 6/15/2011 RUBI, TRICIA 50.00 AP - 00311318 6/15/2011 RUBI, TRICIA 15.00 AP - 00311319 6/15/2011 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPT 180.00 AP - 00311319 6/15/2011 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPT 258.00 AP - 00311320 6/15/2011 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPT 9,802.43 AP - 00311322 6/15/2011 SBPEA 701.48 AP - 00311323 6/15/2011 SC FUELS 17,431.64 AP - 00311323 6/15/2011 SC FUELS 12,622.91 AP - 00311324 6/15/2011 SHERIFFS COURT SERVICES 194.11 AP - 00311325 6/15/2011 SHERIFFS COURT SERVICES 150.00 AP - 00311326 6/15/2011 SHERIFFS COURT SERVICES 30.51 AP - 00311327 6/15/2011 SHRED IT 38.38 AP - 00311327 6/15/2011 SHRED IT 19.19 AP - 00311327 6/15/2011 SHRED IT 19.19 AP - 00311327 6/15/2011 SHRED IT 19.19 AP - 00311328 6/15/2011 SIMPLOT PARTNERS 1,398.53 AP - 00311332 6/15/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.92 AP - 00311332 6/15/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 55.62 AP - 00311332 6/15/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 35.24 AP - 00311332 6/15/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.64 AP - 00311332 6/15/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 78.85 AP - 00311332 6/15/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.09 AP - 00311332 6/15/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 49.94 AP - 00311332 6/15/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 10.05 AP - 00311332 6/15/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 28.27 AP - 00311332 6/15/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 44.13 AP - 00311332 6/15/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.24 AP - 00311332 6/15/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 65.40 AP - 00311332 6/15/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 21.80 AP - 00311332 6/15/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 27.33 AP - 00311332 6/15/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 151.23 AP - 00311332 6/15/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 4,304.03 AP - 00311332 6/15/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 107.59 AP - 00311332 6/15/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 46.30 . AP - 00311332 6/15/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 98.66 AP - 00311332 6/15/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 36.61 AP - 00311332 6/15/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 119.20 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 18 Report: CK_AGENDA REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Current Date: 06/30/201 Time: 07:15:1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P37 Agenda Check Register 6/8/2011 through 6/28/2011 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 0031-1332 6/15/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 114.85 AP - 00311332 6/15/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 48.76 AP - 00311332 6/15/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 21.80 AP - 00311332 6/15/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 21.80 AP - 00311332 6/15/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.19 AP - 00311332 6/15/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.29 AP - 00311332 6/15/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.19 AP - 00311332 6/15/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.29 AP - 00311332 6/15/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 139.78 AP - 00311332 6/15/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 48.57 AP -'00311332 6/15/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.54 AP - 00311332 6/15/2011- SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 49.54 AP - 00311332 6/15/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.44 AP - 00311332 6/15/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 193.32 AP - 00311332 6/15/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 64.69 AP - 00311332 6/15/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 7,027.21 AP - 00311332 6/15/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.53 AP - 00311332 6/15/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 34.48 AP - 00311332 6/15/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 21.13 AP - 00311332 6/15/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 21.52 AP - 00311332 6/15/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14,711.99 AP - 00311332 6/15/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 714.70 AP - 00311332 6/15/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.29 AP - 00311332 6/15/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.60 AP - 00311332 6/15/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 373.28 AP - 00311332 6/15/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 137.24 AP - 00311332 6/15/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 26.86 AP - 00311332 6/15/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 328.70 AP - 00311332 6/15/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 58.52 AP - 00311332 6/15/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 67.08 AP - 00311332 6/15/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 166.46 AP - 00311332 6/15/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.44 AP - 00311332 6/15/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.29 AP - 00311332 6/15/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.44 AP - 00311332 6/15/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.29 AP - 00311332 6/15/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 89.46 AP - 00311332 6/15/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.64 AP - 00311332 6/15/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.24 AP - 00311332 6/15/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 54.44 AP - 00311332 6/15/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 69.07 AP - 00311332 6/15/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 11.19 AP - 00311332 6/15/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 2.80 AP - 00311332 6/15/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.99 AP - 00311332 6/15/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 46.77 AP - 00311332 6/15/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.09 AP - 00311332 6/15/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 51.55 AP - 00311332 6/15/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 51.84 AP - 00311332 6/15/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.38 AP - 00311332 6/15/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 57.21 AP = 00311332 6/15/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 3.87 AP - 00311332 6/15/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 1,063.50 AP - 00311332 6/15/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.09 AP - 00311332 6/15/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.02 AP - 00311332 6/15/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 21.85___ User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 19 Current Date: 06/30/201 Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 07:15:1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P38 Agenda Check Register 6/8/2011 through 6/28/2011 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00311332 6/15/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.99 AP - 00311332 6/15/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 43.80 AP - 00311332 6/15/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.79 - AP - 00311332 6/15/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.30 AP - 00311332 6/15/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.09 AP - 00311332 6/15/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 76.39 AP - 00311332 6/15/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.09 AP - 00311332 6/15/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.64 AP - 00311332 6/15/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.64 AP - 00311332 6/15/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 37.81 AP - 00311332 6/15/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 50.91 AP - 00311332 6/15/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.30 AP - 00311332 6/15/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.09 AP - 00311332 6/15/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.09 AP - 00311332 6/15/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.09 AP - 00311332 6/15/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.09 AP - 00311332 6/15/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 27.83 AP - 00311332 6/15/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON ~ 24.09 AP - 00311332 6/15/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.99 AP - 00311332 6/15/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 21.98 AP - 00311332 6/15/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.09 AP - 00311332 6/15/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 78.27 AP - 00311332 6/15/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 78.27 AP - 00311332 6/15/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.45 AP - 00311332 6/15/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 3.12 AP - 00311332 6/15/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 29.45 AP - 00311332 6/15/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.30 AP - 00311332 6/15/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.09 AP - 00311332- 6/15/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 7,148.83 AP - 00311332 6/15/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 79.94 AP - 00311332 6/15/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 32.50 AP - 00311332 6/15/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 1.18 AP - 00311332 6/15/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 89.82 AP - 00311332 6/15/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 90.76 AP - 00311332 6/15/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.09 AP - 00311332 6/15/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 21.80 AP - 00311332 6/15/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 94.08 AP - 00311332 6/15/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA.EDISON 29.16 AP - 00311332 6/15/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 71.08 AP - 00311332 6/15/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 85.12 AP - 00311332 6/15/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 48.59 AP - 00311332 6/15/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 21.80 AP - 00311332 6/15/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 55.46 AP - 00311332 6/15/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.24 AP - 00311332 6/15/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.99 AP - 00311332 6/15/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.64 AP - 00311332 6/15/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.09 AP - 00311332 6/15/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.64 AP - 00311332 6/15/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 21.82 AP - 00311333 6/15/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 34.17 AP - 00311333 6/15/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22,612.62 AP - 00311333 6/15/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 46,896.06 AP - 00311333 6/15/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14,481.32 AP - 00311333 6/15/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 128.78 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 20 Current Date: 06/30/201 Report: CK_AGENDA REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 07:15:1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P39 Agenda Check Register 6/8/2011 through 6/28/2011 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00311333 6/15/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 37.41 AP - 00311333 6/15/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 4,947.53 AP - 00311333 6/15/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 5,556.91 AP - 00311333 6/15/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON .11,338.19 AP - 00311333 6/15/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 1,458.76 AP - 00311333 6/15/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 4,213.38 AP - 00311333 6/15/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12,954.94 AP - 00311333 6/15/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 5,730.84 AP - 00311333 6/15/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 3,583.80 AP - 00311333 6/15/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 8,902.99 AP - 00311333 6/15/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16,619.45 AP - 00311333 6/15/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22,612.62 AP - 00311333 6/15/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 35.92 AP - 00311334 6/15/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 31.22 AP - 00311334 6/15/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 34.15 AP - 00311334 6/15/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 345.18 AP - 00311334 6/15/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 169.13 AP - 00311334 6/15/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 249.58 AP - 00311334 6/15/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 84.17 AP - 00311335 6/15/2011 SPECTRUM CARE LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATIO 2,683.24 AP - 00311336 6/15/2011 SPINITAR 315.00 AP - 00311337 6/15/2011 STANLEY CONVERGENT SECURITY.SOLUTION 190.00 AP - 00311338 6/15/2011 STAPLETON, JOSHUA 513.50 AP - 00311339 6/15/2011 STATER BROS MARKETS 3,800.00 AP - 00311340 6/15/2011 STOFA, JOSEPH 11.00 AP - 00311341 6/15/2011 SUNGARD PUBLIC SECTOR INC 427.20 AP - 00311342 6/15/2011 SUNSHINE GROWERS NURSERY INC 25.23 AP - 00311343 6/15/2011 SUPERIOR PAVEMENT MARKING INC 15,679.81 AP - 00311344 6/15/2011 SWANK MOTION PICTURES INC 321.00 AP - 00311346 6/15/2011 TERRA VISTA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50.00 AP - 00311346 6/15/2011 TERRA VISTA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 25.00 AP = 00311347 6/15/2011 THEATRICAL LIGHTING & SCENIC SERVICES L 284.90 AP - 00311349 6/15/2011 UNIQUE MANAGEMENT SERVICES INC 466.81 AP - 00311350 6/15/2011 UNITED SITE SERVICES OF CA INC 218.30 AP - 00311351 6/15/2011 UNITED WAY 235.50 AP - 00311351 6/15/2011 UNITED WAY 11.00 AP - 00311352 6/15/2011 UPS 49.53 AP - 00311352 6/15/2011 UPS 69.00 AP - 00311352 6/15/2011 UPS 31.89 AP - 00311353 6/15/2011 VALLEY CREST LANDSCAPE MAINTENACE 500.00 AP - 00311354 6/15/2011 VCA CENTRAL ANIMAL HOSPITAL 829.38 AP - 00311356 6/15/2011 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 87.77 AP - 00311356 6/15/2011 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 475.03 AP - 00311356 6/15/2011 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 36.89 AP - 00311356 6/15/2011 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 38.06 AP - 00311356 6/15/2011 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 38.06 AP - 00311356 6/15/2011 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 18.03 AP - 00311356 6/15/2011 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 77.55 AP - 00311356 6/15/2011 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 46.76 AP - 00311356 6/15/2011 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 38.89 AP - 00311356 6/15/2011 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 3,143.01 AP - 00311356 6/15/2011 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 18.54 AP - 00311356 6/15/2011 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 36.89 AP - 00311356 6/15/2011 VERIZON CALIFORNIA __ __ _ ____ ___ ___ _18.03 _ _ User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 21 Current Date: 06/30/201 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAI T_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 07:15:1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 6/8/2011 through 6/28/2011 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00311356 6/15/2011 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 18.03 AP - 00311356 6/15/2011 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 423.97 AP - 00311356 6/15/2011 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 38.67 AP - 00311356 6/15/2011 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 38.06 AP - 00311356 6/15/2011 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 36.89 AP - 00311356 6/15/2011 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 109.04 AP - 00311356 6/15/2011 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 36.89 AP - 00311356 6/15/2011 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 18.03 AP - 00311356 6/15/2011 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 41.96 AP - 00311356 6/15/2011 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 184.48 AP - 00311356 6/15/2011 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 54.01 AP - 00311356 6/15/2011 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 38.67 AP - 00311356 6/15/2011 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 20.14 AP - 00311356 6/15/2011 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 36.89 AP - 00311356 6/15/2011 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 73.80 AP - 00311356 6/15/2011 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 37.41 AP - 00311356 6/15/2011 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 23.38 AP - 00311356 6/15/2011 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 38.38 AP - 00311356 6/15/2011 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 19.82 AP - 00311356 6/15/2011 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 36.89 AP - 00311356 6/15/2011 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 85.30 AP - 00311356 6/15/2011 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 169.96 AP - 00311356 6/15/2011 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 38.06 AP - 00311356 6/15/2011 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 19.82 AP - 00311356 6/15/2011 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 275.43 AP - 00311356 6/15/2011 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 78.22 AP - 00311356 6/15/2011 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 48.62 AP - 00311356 6/15/2011 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 48.62 AP - 00311356 6/15/2011 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 36.89 AP - 00311356 6/15/2011 VERIZON CALIFORNIA _ 147.58 AP - 00311356 6/15/2011 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 278.11 AP - 00311356 6/15/2011 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 167.92 AP - 00311356 6/15/2011 VERIZON CALIFORNIA- 658.12 AP - 00311357 6/15/2011 VERSATILE INFORMATION PRODUCTS INC 177.00 AP - 00311358 6/15/2011 VICTORIA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50.00 AP - 00311358 6/15/2011 VICTORIA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 25.00 AP - 00311358 6/15/2011 VICTORIA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 25.00 AP - 00311358 6/15/2011 VICTORIA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 25.00 AP - 00311358 6/15/2011 VICTORIA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50.00. AP - 00311358 6/15/2011 VICTORIA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50.00 AP - 00311358 6/15/2011 VICTORIA ANIMAL HOSPITAL ~ 50.00 AP - 00311358 6/15/2011 VICTORIA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50.00 AP - 00311358 6/15/2011 VICTORIA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50.00 AP - 00311358 6/15/2011 VICTORIA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50.00 AP - 00311358 6/15/2011 VICTORIA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50.00 AP - 00311358 6/15/2011 VICTORIA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50.00 AP - 00311358 6/15/2011 VICTORIA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50.00 AP - 00311359 6/15/2011 VICTORIA GARDENS ESCROW 121.34 AP - 00311361 6/15/2011 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 434.57 AP - 00311361 6/15/2011 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 35.59 AP - 00311361 6/15/2011 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 38.73 AP - 00311361 6/15/2011 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 31.60 AP - 00311361 6/15/2011 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 337.13 AP - 00311361 6/15/2011 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 36.10 P40 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 22 Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Current Date: 06/30/201 Time: 07:15:1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 6/8/2011 through 6/28/2011 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00311361 6/15/2011 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 35.60 AP - 00311361 6/15/2011 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 4,333.55 AP - 00311361 6/15/2011 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 3,591.05 AP - 00311361 6/15/2011 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 26.27 AP - 00311361 6/15/2011 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 1,349.53 AP - 00311361 6/15/2011 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 18.65 AP - 00311361 6/15/2011 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 11.31 AP - 00311361 6/15/2011 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 39.30 AP - 00311361 6/15/2011 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 32.65 AP - 00311361 6/15/2011 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 449.67 AP - 00311361 6/15/2011 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 14.70 AP - 00311361 6/15/2011 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 27.30 AP - 00311361 6/15/2011 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 272.51 AP -00311362 6/15/2011 WARD, ANGEL 50.00 AP - 00311363 6/15/2011 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY .59.48 AP - 00311363 6/15/2011 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 81.00 AP - 00311363 6/15/2011 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 345.43 AP - 00311363 6/15/2011 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 844.24 AP - 00311363 6/15/2011 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 1,122.34 AP - 00311363 6/15/2011 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 90.06 AP - 00311364 6/15/2011 WESCO RECEIVABLES CORP 951.56 AP - 00311364 6/15/2011 WESCO RECEIVABLES CORP 380.63 AP - 00311364 6/15/2011 WESCO RECEIVABLES CORP 605.52 AP - 00311365 6/15/2011 WEST COAST LIGHTS & SIRENS 70.44 AP - 00311365 6/15/2011 WEST COAST LIGHTS & SIRENS 70.44 AP - 00311367 6/15/2011 WESTERN UNIVERSITY 43.00 AP - 00311367 6/15/2011 WESTERN UNIVERSITY 35.00 AP - 00311367 6/15/2011 WESTERN UNIVERSITY. 35.00 AP - 00311367 6/15/2011 WESTERN UNIVERSITY 43.00 AP -.00311367 6/15/2011 WESTERN UNIVERSITY 35.00 AP - 00311367 6/15/2011 WESTERN UNIVERSITY 35.00 AP - 00311367 6/15/2011 WESTERN UNIVERSITY 43.00 AP - 00311368 6/15/2011 WILDLIFE COMPANY, THE 320.00 AP - 00311369 6/15/2011 WILDLIFE COMPANY, THE 615.00 AP - 00311371 6/15/2011 WILLIAMS CONST & BACKHOE SVC INC 2,425.00 AP - 00311371 6/15/2011 WILLIAMS CONST & BACKHOE SVC INC 1,700.00. AP - 00311372 6/15/2011 WONG, CHRISTINE. 475.00 AP - 00311373 6/15/2011 WORD MILL PUBLISHING 1,300.00 AP - 00311374 6/15/2011 ZEE MEDICAL INC 53.43 AP - 00311375 6/16/2011 ABC LOCKSMITHS 75.00 AP - 00311375 6/16/2011 ABC LOCKSMITHS 157.85 AP - 00311376 6/16/2011 AIRGAS WEST 202.63 AP - 00311376 6/16/2011 AIRGAS WEST 115.09 AP - 00311376 6/16/2011 AIRGAS WEST 32.14 AP - 00311376 6/16/2011 AIRGAS WEST 29.74 AP - 00311379 6/16/2011 BRODART BOOKS 17.61 AP - 00311379 6/16/2011 BRODART BOOKS 14.13 AP - 00311379 6/16/2011 BRODART BOOKS 15.27 AP - 00311379 6/16/2011 BRODART BOOKS 14.64 AP - 00311379 6/16/2011 BRODART BOOKS 15.26 AP - 00311379 6/16/2011 BRODART BOOKS 4.51 AP - 00311379 6/16/2011 BRODART BOOKS 104.51 AP - 00311379 6/16/2011 BRODART BOOKS 49.79 AP - 00311379 6/16/2011 BRODART BOOKS _ 10.17 P41 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 23 Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Current Date: 06/30/201 Time: 07:15:1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 6/8/2011 through 6/28/2011 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00311379 6/16/2011 BRODART BOOKS 566.92 AP - 00311379 6/16/2011 BRODART BOOKS 22.02 AP - 00311379 6/16/2011 BRODART BOOKS 16.63 AP - 00311379 6/16/2011 BRODART BOOKS 16.63 AP - 00311379 6/16/2011 BRODART BOOKS 841.94 AP - 00311379 6/16/2011 BRODART BOOKS 40.59 AP - 00311379 6/16/2011 BRODART BOOKS 40.62 AP - 00311379 6/16/2011 BRODART BOOKS 4.51 AP - 00311379 6/16/2011 BRODART BOOKS 24.73 AP - 00311379 6/16/2011 BRODART BOOKS 4.51 AP - 00311379 6/16/2011 BRODART BOOKS 203.03 AP - 00311379 6/16/2011 BRODART BOOKS 9.02 AP - 00311379 6/16/2011 BRODART BOOKS 6.69 AP - 00311379 6/16/2011 BRODART BOOKS 4.51 AP - 00311379 6/16/2011 BRODART BOOKS 4.51 AP - 00311379 6/16/2011 BRODART BOOKS ~ 58.68 AP - 00311379 6/16/2011 BRODART BOOKS 4.51 AP - 00311379 6/16/2011 BRODART BOOKS 4.51 AP - 00311379 6/16/2011 BRODART BOOKS 6.69 AP - 00311379 6/16/2011 BRODART BOOKS 13.54 AP - 00311379 6/16/2011 BRODART BOOKS 277.29 AP - 00311379 6/16/2011 BRODART BOOKS 22.40 AP - 00311379 6/16/2011 BRODART BOOKS 315.81 AP - 00311379 6/16/2011 BRODART BOOKS 9.03 AP - 00311379 6/16/2011 BRODART BOOKS 13.53 AP - 00311379 6/16/2011 BRODART BOOKS 4.51 AP - 00311379 6/16/2011 BRODART BOOKS 114.93 AP - 00311379 6/16/2011 BRODART BOOKS 4.51 AP - 00311379 6/16/2011 BRODART BOOKS 9.02 AP - 00311379 6/16/2011 BRODART BOOKS 9.02 AP - 00311379 6/16/2011 BRODART BOOKS 444.91 AP - 00311379 6/16/2011 BRODART BOOKS 10.73 AP - 00311379 6/16/2011 BRODART BOOKS 162.32 AP - 00311379 6/16/2011 BRODART BOOKS 1,106.02 AP - 00311379 6/16/2011 BRODART BOOKS 35.19 AP - 00311379 6/16/2011 BRODART BOOKS 14.10 AP - 00311379 6/16/2011 BRODART BOOKS 41.07 AP - 00311379 6/16/2011 BRODART BOOKS 28.82 AP - 00311379 6/16/2011 BRODART BOOKS 21.53 AP - 00311379 6/16/2011 BRODART BOOKS 29.96 AP - 00311379 6/16/2011 BRODART BOOKS 24.43 AP - 00311379 6/16/2011 BRODART BOOKS 4.51 AP - 00311379 6/16/2011 BRODART BOOKS 9.02 AP - 00311379 6/16/2011 BRODART BOOKS 114.78 AP - 00311379 6/16/2011 BRODART BOOKS 4.51 AP - 00311379 6/16/2011 BRODART BOOKS 4.51 AP - 00311379 6/16/2011 BRODART BOOKS 4.51 AP - 00311379 6/16/2011 BRODART BOOKS 4.51 AP - 00311379 6/16/2011 BRODART BOOKS 11.20 AP - 00311379 6/16/2011 BRODART BOOKS 9.02 AP - 00311379 6/16/2011 BRODART BOOKS 517.23 AP - 00311379 6/16/2011 BRODART BOOKS 798.17 AP - 00311379 6/16/2011 BRODART BOOKS 2838 AP - 00311379 6/16/2011 BRODART BOOKS 35.90 P42 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 24 Report: CK_AGENDA REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Current Date: 06/30/201 Time: 07:15:1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 6/8/2011 through 6/28/2011 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00311379 6/16/2011 BRODART BOOKS 16.63 AP - 00311379 6/16/2011 BRODART BOOKS 495.40 AP - 00311379 6/16/2011 BRODART BOOKS 10.73 AP - 00311379 6/16/2011 BRODART BOOKS 4.51 AP - 00311379 6/16/2011 BRODART BOOKS 13.53 AP - 00311379 6/16/2011 BRODART BOOKS 6837 AP - 00311379 6/16/2011 BRODART BOOKS 103.88 AP - 00311379 6/16/2011 BRODART BOOKS 15.80 AP - 00311379 6/16/2011 BRODART BOOKS 19.35 AP - 00311379 6/16/2011 BRODART BOOKS 15.82 AP - 00311379 6/16/2011 BRODART BOOKS 30.47 AP - 00311379 6/16/2011 BRODART BOOKS 17.61 AP - 00311379 6/16/2011 BRODART BOOKS 15.27 AP - 00311379 6/16/2011 BRODART BOOKS 29.96 AP - 00311379 6/16/2011 BRODART BOOKS 41.38 AP - 00311379 6/16/2011 BRODART BOOKS - 114.11 AP - 00311379 6/16/2011 BRODART BOOKS 123.40 AP - 00311379 6/16/2011 BRODART BOOKS 10.17 AP - 00311379 6/16/2011 BRODART BOOKS 4.51 AP - 00311379 6/16/2011 BRODART BOOKS 36.08 AP - 00311379 6/16/2011 BRODART BOOKS 13.54 AP - 00311379 6/16/2011 BRODART BOOKS 212.03 AP - 00311379 6/16/2011 BRODART BOOKS 4.51 AP - 00311379 6/16/2011 BRODART BOOKS 331.52 AP - 00311380 6/16/2011 COMP U ZONE 261.00 AP - 00311380 6/16/2011 COMP U ZONE 85.00 AP - 00311380 6/16/2011 COMP U ZONE 85.00 AP - 00311380 6/16/2011 COMP U ZONE 85.00 AP - 00311380 6/16/2011 COMP U ZONE 85.00 AP - 00311380 6/16/2011 COMP U ZONE 45.68 AP - 00311382 6/16/2011 DAPPER TIRE CO 68.65 AP - 00311382 6/16/2011 DAPPER TIRE CO 3,867.12 AP - 00311383 6/16/2011 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 2,67135 AP - 00311383 6/16/2011 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 468.88 AP - 00311383 6/16/2011 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 85.56 AP - 00311384 6/16/2011 GENERATOR SERVICES CO 1,877.40 AP - 00311384 6/16/2011 GENERATOR SERVICES CO 4,424.34 AP - 00311385 6/16/2011 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 150.00 AP - 00311385 6/16/2011 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 775.12 AP - 00311385 6/16/2011 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 1,291.14 AP - 00311385 6/16/2011 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 126.47 AP - 00311385 6/16/2011 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 446.69 AP - 00311385 6/16/2011 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 50.00 AP - 00311386 6/16/2011 HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS INC 36.69 AP - 00311386 6/16/2011 HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS INC 133.24 AP - 00311387 6/16/2011 INTERSTATE BATTERIES 228.28 AP - 00311388 6/16/2011 IRONMAN PARTS AND SERVICES 400.00 AP - 00311389 6/16/2011 LAB SAFETY SUPPLY INC 237.36 AP - 00311390 6/16/2011 MAIN STREET SIGNS 326.25 AP - 00311390 6/16/2011 MAIN STREET SIGNS 326.25 AP - 00311391 6/16/2011 MARSHA L.LEE & ROBERT J.ROSSI ESQ.HOMAr 13,500.00 AP - 00311392 6/16/2011 MARSHA L.LEE & ROBERT J.ROSSI ESQ.HOMAr 13,500.00 AP - 00311393 6/22/2011 Al AUTOMOTIVE 61.37 AP - 00311394 6/22/2011 ACE ELECTRIC INC. 692.53 P43 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page:. 25 Report: CK_AGENDA REG_PORTRAIT RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Current Date: 06/30/201 Time: 07:15:1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P44 Agenda Check Register 6/8/2011 through 6/28/2011 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00311397 6/22/2011 ADVANTEC CONSULTING ENGINEERS 7,892.94 AP - 00311397 6/22/2011 ADVANTEC CONSULTING ENGINEERS 12,556.95 AP - 00311397 6/22/2011 ADVANTEC CONSULTING ENGINEERS 2,983.96 AP - 00311397 6/22/2011 ADVANTEC CONSULTING ENGINEERS 472:99 AP - 00311397 6/22/2011 ADVANTEC CONSULTING ENGINEERS 5,443.05 AP - 00311397 6/22/2011 ADVANTEC CONSULTING ENGINEERS 15,427.11 AP - 00311399 6/22/2011 AGAPE EMPLOYMENT 682.00 AP - 00311399 6/22/2011 AGAPE EMPLOYMENT 38.37 AP - 00311399 6/22/2011 AGAPE EMPLOYMENT 682.00 AP - 00311399 6/22/2011 AGAPE EMPLOYMENT 25.58 AP - 00311401 6/22/2011 ALL CITY MANAGEMENT SERVICES INC. 22,029.60 AP - 00311402 6/22/2011 ALLIANT INSURANCE SERVICES INC. 2,781.25 AP - 00311403 6/22/2011 ALLIED 100 4,480.00 AP - 00311404 6/22/2011 ALMEDA, JOSE 250.00 AP - 00311406 6/22/2011 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50.00 AP - 00311406 6/22/2011 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 25.00 AP - 00311406 6/22/2011 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 25.00 AP - 00311406 6/22/2011 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50.00 AP - 00311406 6/22/2011 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 25.00 AP - 00311406 6/22/2011 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL X0.00 AP - 00311406 6/22/2011 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50.00 AP - 00311406 6/22/2011 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50.00 AP - 00311406 6/22/2011 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50.00 AP - 00311406 6/22/2011 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50.00 AP - 00311406 6/22/2011 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL; 50.00 AP - 00311406 6/22/2011 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 25.00 AP - 00311406 6/22/2011 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50.00 AP - 00311406 6/22/2011 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50.00 AP - 00311406 6/22/2011 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50.00 AP - 00311406 6/22/2011 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50.00 AP - 00311406 6/22/2011 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50.00 AP - 00311406. 6/22/2011 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50.00 AP - 00311406 6/22/2011. . ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50.00 AP - 00311406 6/22/2011 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50.00 AP - 00311406 6/22/2011 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50.00 AP - 00311406 6/22/2011 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50.00 AP - 00311406 6/22/2011 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50.00 AP - 00311406 6/22/2011 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50.00 AP - 00311406 6/22/2011 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50.00 AP - 00311406 6/22/2011 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50.00 AP - 00311406 6/22/2011 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50.00 AP - 00311406 6/22/2011 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50.00 AP - 00311406 6/22/2011 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50.00 AP - 00311406 6/22/2011 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 25.00 AP - 00311406 6/22/2011 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50.00 AP - 00311406 6/22/2011 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50.00 AP - 00311406 6/22/2011 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50.00 AP - 00311406 .6/22/2011 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50.00 AP - 00311406 6/22/2011 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL ~ ~ 50.00 AP - 00311406 6/22/2011 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 25.00 AP - 00311406 6/22/2011 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50.00 AP - 00311406 6/22/2011 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50.00 AP - 00311406 6/22/2011 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50.00 AP - 00311406 6/22/2011 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL _ 25.00 ___ User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 26 Current Date: 06/30/201 Report: CK_AGENDA REG_PORTRAI T_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 07:15:1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 6/8/2011 through 6/28/2011 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00311407 6/22/2011 AMARA, MAYBELLE LEBBIE- 144:00 AP - 00311408 6/22/2011 APPLIED METERING TECHNOLOGIES INC 8,142.00 AP - 00311409 6/22/2011 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES 3.35 AP - 00311409 6/22/2011 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES 3.35 AP - 00311411 6/22/2011 ASAP POWERSPORTS 371.50 AP - 00311413 6/22/2011 ATC ASSOCIATES INC 5,500.00 AP - 00311414 6/22/2011 AUNUTRA INDUSTRIES INC. 121.14 AP - 00311415 6/22/2011 AUTO RESTORATORS INC 1,762.57 AP - 00311416 6/22/2011 BARBARA'S ANSWERING SERVICE 572.00 AP - 00311417 6/22/2011 BARNES AND NOBLE 63.41 AP - 00311417 6/22/2011 BARNES AND NOBLE 44.32 AP - 00311417 6/22/2011 BARNES AND NOBLE 58.05 AP - 00311418 6/22/2011 BOLTON, HEATHER 56.10 AP - 00311419 6/22/2011 BROWN, PAM 500.00 AP - 00311420 6/22/2011 BRUNO MANCINELLI CONSTRUCTION 5,250.00 AP - 00311422 6/22/2011 BUTLER SCHEIN ANIMAL HEALTH SUPPLY 193.48 AP - 00311423 6/22/2011 CAIRES, RICK 38.00 AP - 00311424 6/22/2011 CAL PERS LONG TERM CARE 673.53 AP - 00311424 6/22/2011 CAL PERS LONG TERM CARE 673.53 AP - 00311425 6/22/2011 CALLACI, ALLEN JOHN 1,463.24 AP - 00311426 6/22/2011 CASTREJON, DONNA 94.35 AP - 00311427 6/22/2011' CDW-G 277.69 AP - 00311427 6/22/2011 CDW-G 562.19 AP - 00311430 6/22/2011 CINEVATIVE 7,000.00 AP - 00311432 6/22/2011 CLEARWATER GRAPHICS 1,183.20 AP - 00311432 6/22/2011 CLEARWATER GRAPHICS 935.25 AP - 00311432 6/22/2011 CLEARWATER GRAPHICS 1,183.20. AP - 00311433 6/22/2011 CLEVELAND, DANITA 50.00 AP - 00311434 6/22/2011 CRA 26,570.00 AP - 00311435 6/22/2011 CRIME SCENE STERI-CLEAN LLC 540.00 AP - 00311437 6/22/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 256.58 AP - 00311437 6/22/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 93.36 AP - 00311437 6/22/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 467.27 AP - 00311437 6/22/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 47.39 AP - 00311437 6/22/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 120.24 AP - 00311437 6/22/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 76.50 AP - 00311437 6/22/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 13.83 AP - 00311437 6/22/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 63.07 AP - 00311437 6/22/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 142.88 AP - 00311437 6/22/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 224.58 AP - 00311437 6/22/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 184.22 AP - 00311437 6/22/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 56.83 AP - 00311437 6/22/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 249.39 AP - 00311437 6/22/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 56.31 AP - 00311437 6/22/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT. 59.35 AP - 00311437 6/22/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 156.15 AP - 00311437 6/22/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 89.22 AP - 00311437 6/22/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 2,599.51 AP - 00311437 6/22/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,455.99 AP - 00311437 6/22/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,356.36 AP - 00311437 6/22/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 119.47 AP - 00311437 6/22/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 40.28 AP - 00311437 6/22/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 176.32 AP - 00311437 6/22/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 403.12 P45 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 27 Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Current Date: 06/30/201 Time: 07:15:1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 6/8/2011 through 6/28/2011 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name AP - 00311437 6/22/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP - 00311437 6/22/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP - 00311437 6/22/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP - 00311437 6/22/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP - 00311437 6/22/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP - 00311437 6/22/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP - 00311437 6/22/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP - 00311437 6/22/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP - 00311437 6/22/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP - 00311437 6/22/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP - 00311437 6/22/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP - 00311437 6/22/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP - 00311437 6/22/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP - 00311437 6/22/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP - 00311437 6/22/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP.- 00311437 6/22/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AP - 00311438 6/22/2011 CYCLERY USA INC. AP - 00311438 6/22/2011 CYCLERY USA INC. AP - 00311438 6/22/2011 CYCLERY USA INC. AP - 00311438 6/22/2011 CYCLERY USA INC. AP - 00311438 6/22/2011 CYCLERY USA INC. AP - 00311439 6/22/2011 DATONG ELECTRONICS AP - 00311440 6/22/2011 DATONG ELECTRONICS AP - 00311441 6/22/2011 DAVID TAUSSIG AND ASSOCIATES INC. AP - 00311441 6/22/2011 DAVID TAUSSIG AND ASSOCIATES INC. AP - 00311441 6/22/2011 DAVID TAUSSIG AND ASSOCIATES INC. AP - 00311441 6/22/2011 DAVID TAUSSIG AND ASSOCIATES INC. AP - 00311442 6/22/2011 DELA ROCA, MARICAR AP - 00311444. 6/22/2011 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE AP - 00311444 6/22/2011 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE AP - 00311444 6/22/2011 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE AP - 00311444 6/22/2011 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE AP - 00311445 6/22/2011 DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES AP - 00311445 6/22/2011 DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES AP - 00311446 6/22/2011 DIAMOND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES AP - 00311447 6/22/2011 DIGITAL AUDIO CORPORATION AP - 00311448 6/22/2011 DOHERTY, ROBIN AP - 00311449 6/22/2011 DREAM SHAPERS AP - 00311449 6/22/2011 DREAM SHAPERS AP - 00311450 6/22/2011 DURKEL, CAROL AP - 00311451 6/22/2011 EIGHTH AVENUE ENTERPRISE LLC AP - 00311452 6/22/2011 ENGRAVE'N EMBROIDER THINGS AP - 00311453 6/22/2011 ENTERSECT CORP AP - 00311454 6/22/2011 ETERNAL LEGACY PROPERTIES INC. AP - 00311455 6/22/2011 EXPERIAN AP - 00311456 6/22/20.11 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP AP - 00311458 b/22/2011 FLOWERS, JAMES AP - 00311459 6/22/2011 FORD OF UPLAND INC AP - 00311459 6/22/2011 FORD OF UPLAND INC AP - 00311459 6/22/2011 FORD OF UPLAND INC AP - 00311459 6/22/2011 FORD OF UPLAND INC AP - 00311460 6/22/2011 FOX, MICHELE AP - 00311461 6/22/2011 G AND M BUSINESS INTERIORS AP - 00311461 6/22/2011 G AND M BUSINESS INTERIORS P46 Amount 165.51 90.95 716.20 224.56 331.03 100.76 159.26 306.54 699.99 1,953.06 2,481.77 56.83 402.94 131.95 530.50 2,169.28 11.95 50.00 150.08 50.00 69.58 16.05 1,500.00 320.00 100..00 1,500.00 950.00 40.00 576.00 15.00 1,866.00 51.00 18.00 18.00 212.59 16,930.00 50.00 475.00 250.00 69.36 1,371.65 42.40 26.85 31.78 52.00 25.04 595.00 369.18 369.18 167.19 105.22 20.00 450.00 285.00 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 28 Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Current Date: 06/30/201 Time: 07:15:1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 6/8/2011 through 6/28/201 I Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00311462 6/22/2011 GALE GROUP,THE 26.09 AP - 00311462 6/22/2011 GALE GROUP,THE 150.47 AP - 00311462 6/22/2011 GALE GROUP,THE 27.84 AP - 00311463 6/22/2011 GAMEZ, ERIKA ~ 89.07 AP - 00311464 6/22/2011 GONSALVES AND SON,JOE A 3,000.00 AP - 00311464 6/22/2011 GONSALVES AND SON,JOE A 45.00 AP - 00311465 6/22/2011 GONZALES, GLORIA 925.00 AP - 00311466 6/22/2011 GOODWILL OF SOUTHERN CALIF 1,000.00 AP - 00311467 6/22/2011 GRAINGER 671.77 AP - 00311467 .6/22/2011 GRAINGER 294.60 AP - 00311467 6/22/2011 GRAINGER 246.05 AP - 00311467 6/22/2011 GRAINGER 392.81 AP - 00311467 6/22/2011 GRAINGER 178.41 AP - 00311468 6/22/2011 GRAPHICS FACTORY PRINTING INC. 560.06 AP - 00311470 6/22/2011 GUYSON, CORIE 40.00 AP - 00311470 6/22/2011 GUYSON, CORIE 32:00 AP - 00311471 6/22/2011 HARRY'S PACIFIC GRILL 50.00 AP - 00311472 6/22/2011 HOOD, KARYE 27.14 AP - 00311473 6/22/2011 HUMANE SOCIETY OF SAN BERNARDINO VALI 248.00 AP - 00311474 6/22/2011 HUNTER, TASHA 181.00 AP - 00311474 6/22/2011 HUNTER, TASHA 182.16 AP - 00311475 6/22/2011 IMSA 60.00 AP - 00311475 6/22/2011 IMSA 60.00 AP - 00311475 6/22/2011 IMSA 60.00 AP - 00311476 6/22/2011 INLAND EMPIRE FAMILY 1,122.00 AP - 00311478 6/22/2011 INLAND PRESORT & MAILING SERVICES 77.71 AP - 00311479 6/22/2011 JDC INC 1,625.00 AP - 00311479 6/22/2011 JDC INC 9,485.51 AP - 00311479 6/22/2011 JDC INC 47,165.05 AP - 00311479 6/22/2011 JDC INC 501.49 AP - 00311479 6/22/2011 JDC INC 2,182.00 AP - 00311479 6/22/2011 JDC INC 312.25 AP - 00311480 6/22/2011 JOHN.THE PLUMBER 110.00 AP - 00311481 6/22/2011 JONES AND MAYER, LAW OFFICES OF 1,928.50 AP - 00311482 6/22/2011 K. HOVNANIAN HOMES 159.57 AP - 00311483 6/22/2011 KELLY EQUIPMENT 392.57 AP - 00311484 6/22/2011 KHAN, FAWAD 100.00 AP - 00311485 6/22/2011 KIM, EUN MI 71.00 AP -00311486 6/22/2011 KIM, JEONG SUN 150.00 AP - 00311489 6/22/2011 KREIDER, JESSE 165.25 AP - 00311490 6/22/2011 LAIRD CONSTRUCTION CO 2,801.40 AP - 00311491 6/22/2011 LAKESHORE LEARNING MATERIALS 311.88 AP - 00311491 6/22/2011 LAKESHORE LEARNING MATERIALS 311.88 AP - 00311492 6/22/2011 LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES 40.00 AP - 00311492 6/22/2011 LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES 40.00 AP - 00311492 6/22/2011 LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES 40.00 AP - 00311492 6/22/2011 LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES 40.00 AP - 00311492 6/22/2011 LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES 40.00 AP - 00311492 6/22/2011 LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES 40.00 AP - 00311495 6/22/2011 LINEAR SYSTEMS 3,147.90 AP - 00311496 6/22/2011 LOS ANGELES FREIGHTLINER 13.50 AP - 00311496 6/22/2011 LOS ANGELES FREIGHTLINER 130.14 AP - 00311497 6/22/2011 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 146.85 AP - 00311497 6/22/2011 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 2,952.81 P47 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 29 Report: CK_AGENDA REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Current Date: 06/30/201 Time: 07:15:1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ~ P48 Agenda Check Register 6/8/2011 through 6/28/2011 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00311498 6/22/2011 MARK CHRISTOPHER INC T.79 AP - 00311498 6/22/2011 MARK CHRISTOPHER INC 32.75 AP - 00311499 6/22/2011 MAY, ROBERT 138.00 AP - 00311500 6/22/2011 MCGRATH'S CATERING 549.19 AP - 00311501 6/22/2011 MIDWEST TAPE 104.97 AP - 00311501 6/22/2011 MIDWEST TAPE 224.93 AP - 00311502 6/22/2011 MIGHTY MOVERS TRAILERS INC .2,865.56 AP - 00311503 6/22/2011 MOUNTAIN VIEW GLASS AND MIRROR INC 293.63 AP - 00311504 6/22/2011 MOUNTAIN VIEW SMALL ENG REPAIR 43.39 AP - 00311504 6/22/2011 MOUNTAIN VIEW SMALL ENG REPAIR 5.42 AP - 00311504 6/22/2011 MOUNTAIN VIEW SMALL ENG REPAIR 21.66 AP - 00311505 6/22/2011 MSA INLAND EMPIRE/DESERT CHAPTER 45.00 AP - 00311506 6/22/2011 NAPA AUTO PARTS 134.94 AP - 00311506 6/22/2011 NAPA AUTO PARTS 210.03 AP - 00311508 6/22/2011 NATIONAL DATA & SURVEYING SERVICES 416.00 AP - 00311509 6/22/2011 NIXON EGLI EQUIPMENT CO 2,608.59 AP - 00311511 6/22/2011 OFFICE DEPOT 36.99 AP - 00311511 6/22/2011 OFFICE DEPOT 27.20 AP - 00311511 6/22/2011 OFFICE DEPOT 43.49 AP - 00311511 6/22/2011 OFFICE DEPOT 215.70 AP - 00311511 6/22/2011 OFFICE DEPOT 215.70 AP - 00311511 6/22/2011 OFFICE DEPOT 30.80 AP - 00311511 6/22/2011 OFFICE DEPOT 171.32 AP - 00311511 6/22/2011 OFFICE DEPOT 216.50 AP - 00311511 6/22/2011 OFFICE DEPOT 1,548.13 AP - 00311511 6/22/2011 OFFICE DEPOT 175.84 AP - 00311511 6/22/2011 OFFICE DEPOT 6.84 AP - 00311511 6/22/2011 OFFICE DEPOT 49.64 AP - 00311511 6/22/201 I OFFICE DEPOT 234.81 AP - 00311511 6/22/2011 OFFICE DEPOT 371.04 AP - 00311511 6/22/2011 OFFICE DEPOT 146.19 AP - 00311511 6/22/2011 OFFICE DEPOT 16.46 AP - 00311511 6/22/2011 OFFICE DEPOT 4.39 AP - 00311511 6/22/2011 OFFICE DEPOT - 53.39 AP - 00311511 6/22/2011 OFFICE DEPOT 203.66 AP - 00311511 6/22/2011 OFFICE DEPOT 35.32 AP - 00311511 6/22/2011 OFFICE DEPOT -32.61 AP - 00311511 6/22/2011 OFFICE DEPOT 43.49 AP - 00311511 6/22/2011 OFFICE DEPOT 1,225.44 AP - 00311511 6/22/2011 OFFICE DEPOT 19.15 AP - 00311511 6/22/2011 OFFICE DEPOT 16.12 AP - 00311511 6/22/2011 OFFICE DEPOT 8.77 AP - 00311511 6/22/2011 OFFICE DEPOT 84.18 AP - 00311511 6/22/2011 OFFICE DEPOT 164.42 AP - 00311511 6/22/2011 OFFICE DEPOT 99.48 AP - 00311511 6/22/2011 OFFICE DEPOT 514.87 AP - 00311511 6/22/2011 OFFICE DEPOT ~ 155.01 AP - 00311511 6/22/2011 OFFICE DEPOT 39.64 AP - 00311511 6/22/2011 OFFICE DEPOT 99.28 AP - 00311511 6/22/2011 OFFICE DEPOT 6.87 AP - 00311511 6/22/2011 OFFICE DEPOT 91.35 AP = 00311511 6/22/2011 OFFICE DEPOT 303.79 AP - 00311511 6/22/2011 OFFICE DEPOT 50.29 AP - 00311511 6/22/2011 OFFICE DEPOT 181.37 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 30 Current Date: 06/30/201 Report:CK_AGENDA REG_PORTRAIT RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 07:15:1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 6/8/2011 through-6/28/2011 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00311511 6/22/2011 OFFICE DEPOT 94.61 AP - 00311511 6/22/2011 OFFICE DEPOT 8.61 AP - 00311511 6/22/2011 OFFICE DEPOT 217.14 AP - 00311511 6/22/2011 OFFICE DEPOT 21.70 AP - 00311511 6/22/2011 OFFICE DEPOT 22.23 AP - 00311511 6/22/2011 OFFICE DEPOT 24.27 AP - 00311511 6/22/2011 OFFICE DEPOT 346.98 AP - 00311512 6/22/2011 ORLANDO, JOSEPHINE 12.00 AP - 00311513 6/22/2011 PARS 3,500.00 AP - 00311514 6/22/2011 PASMA 75.00 AP - 00311515 6/22/2011 PATEL, TERESA 120.00 AP - 00311516 6/22/2011 PEPSI-COLA 307.47 AP - 00311517 6/22/2011 PEREZ, DOMINICK 1,700.00 AP - 00311518 6/22/2011 PETES ROAD SERVICE INC 1,471.91 AP - 00311518 6/22/2011 PETES ROAD SERVICE INC 1,096.63 AP - 00311519 6/22/2011 PIP PRINTING 329.35 AP - 00311520 6/22/2011 PIRTLE WELDING 1,400.00 AP - 00311521 6/22/2011 PIXELPUSHERS INC 2,161.00 AP - 00311522 6/22/2011 PMI 1,551.54 AP - 00311523 6/22/2011 PRENTICE, IRENE ~ 10.50 AP - 00311524 6/22%2011 PRIDE LAUNDRY SYSTEMS INC 99.50 AP - 00311525 6/22/2011 PULA LEGAL INTERPRETING NETWORK 180.00 AP - 00311526 6/22/2011 RAN GRAPHICS INC ~ 103.53 AP - 00311527 6/22/2011 RANCHO CUCAMONGA EQUESTRIAN PATROL 1,954.86 AP - 00311528 6/22/2011 RBM LOCK AND KEY SERVICE 11.42 AP - 00311531 6/22/2011 RIPPETOE MILES LLP 887.40 AP - 00311531 6/22/2011 RIPPETOE MILES LLP 506.54 AP - 00311531 6/22/2011 RIPPETOE MILES LLP 103.50 AP - 00311531 6/22/2011 RIPPETOE MILES LLP 315.30 AP - 00311531 6/22/2011 RIPPETOE MILES LLP 3,120.78 AP - 00311531 6/22/2011 RIPPETOE MILES LLP 4,581.15 AP - 00311531 6/22/2011 RIPPETOE MILES LLP 3,580.50 AP - 00311531 6/22/2011 RIPPETOE MILES LLP 634.25 AP - 00311531 6/22/2011 RIPPETOE MILES LLP 3,109.93 AP - 00311531 6/22/2011 RIPPETOE MILES LLP ~ 682.15 AP - 00311531 6/22/2011 RIPPETOE MILES LLP 118.05 AP - 00311531 6/22/2011 RIPPETOE MILES LLP 5,019.26 AP - 00311532 6/22/2011 RTK ARCHITECTS INC 941.57 AP - 00311533 6/22/2011 SAENZ, ANDREA 64.00 AP - 00311534 6/22/2011 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPT 3,958.90 AP - 00311535 6/22/2011 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPT 4,026.00 AP - 00311536 6/22/2011 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY 25.00 AP - 00311539 6/22/2011 SAN BERNARDINO, CITY OF 1,012.22 AP - 00311540 6/22/2011 SANTAVANOND, SAKDA 40.00 AP - 00311542 6/22/2011 SINGH, ANITA 42.00 AP - 00311543 6/22/2011 SLJ PRO AUDIO SERVICES SEAN JONES 300.00 AP - 00311545 .6/22/2011 SOCIAL VOCATIONAL SERVICES 1,400.00 AP - 00311545 6/22/2011 SOCIAL VOCATIONAL SERVICES 650.00 AP - 00311546 6/22/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ASSOC OF GOVERNM 14,919.00 AP - 00311550 6/22/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.32 AP - 00311550 6/22/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 21.54 AP - 00311550 6/22/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.21 AP - 00311550 6/22/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 21.87 AP - 00311550 6/22/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24102 P49 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez - Page: 31 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Current Date: 06/30/201 Time: 07:15:1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 6/8/2011 through 6/28/2011 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name AP - 00311550 6/22/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00311550 6/22/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00311550 6/22/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00311550 6/22/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00311550 6/22/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00311550 6/22/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00311550 6/22/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00311550 6/22/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00311550 6/22/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00311550 6/22/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00311550 6/22/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00311550 6/22/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00311550 6/22/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00311550 6/22/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00311550 6/22/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00311550 6/22/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00311550 6/22/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00311550 6/22/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00311550 6/22/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00311550 6/22/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORMA EDISON AP - 00311550 6/22/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00311550 6/22/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00311550 6/22/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00311550 6/22/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00311550 6/22/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00311550 6/22/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00311550 6/22/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00311550 6/22/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00311550 6/22/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00311550 6/22/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00311550 6/22/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00311550 6/22/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00311550 6/22/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00311550 6/22/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00311550 6/22/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00311550 6/22/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00311550 6/22/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00311550 6/22/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00311550 6/22/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00311550 6/22/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00311550 6/22/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00311550 6/22/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00311550 6/22/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00311550 6/22/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00311550 6/22/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00311550 6/22/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00311550 6/22/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00311550 6/22/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00311550 6/22/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00311550 6/22/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00311550 6/22/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00311550 6/22/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00311550 6/22/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00311550 6/22/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON P50 Amount 73.58 61.98 55.82 24.21 24.63 52.52 38.20 24.21 24.21 1.13 33.67 46.56 24.21 105.93 24.21 24.21 24.07 24.20 24.07 76.09 65.10 22.46 24.21 73.02 23.33 102.74 21.87 57.24 23.48 21.16 166.3 6 77.48 24.71 51.72 79.93 62.92 24.07 24.21 21.87 21.87 72.84 24.07 178.43 134.59 93.30 48.49 24.93 46.62 2,476.84 23.91 28.83 152.42- 50.27 95.60 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 32 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Current Date: 06/30/201 Time: 07:15:1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P51 Agenda Check Register 6/8/2011 through 6/28/2011 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00311550. 6/22/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.33 AP - 00311550 6/22/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 77.38 AP - 00311550 6/22/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 78.04 AP - 00311550 6/22/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.91 AP - 00311550 6/22/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 110.60 AP - 00311550 6/22/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 906.22 AP - 00311550 6/22/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 1,538.79 AP - 00311550. 6/22/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 63.36 AP - 00311550 6/22/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 113.29 AP - 00311550 6/22/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 28.88 AP - 00311550 6/22/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 73.85 AP - 00311550 6/22/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.82 AP - 00311550 6/22/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.32 AP - 00311550 6/22/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.69 AP - 00311550 6/22/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 1.90 AP - 00311550 6/22/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 83.96 AP - 00311550 6/22/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.91 AP - 00311550 6/22/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 5.77 AP - 00311550 6/22/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.20 AP - 00311550 6/22/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 27.70 AP - 00311550 6/22/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 17.94 AP - 00311550 6/22/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.60 AP - 00311550 6/22/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 45.64 AP - 00311550 6/22/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 29.46 AP - 00311550 6/22/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 188.03 AP - 00311550 6/22/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 40.75 AP - 00311550 6/22/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.20 AP - 00311550 6/22/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.21 AP - 00311550 6/22/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.32 AP - 00311550 6/22/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.58 AP - 00311550 6/22/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.21 AP - 00311550 6/22/2011 SOU'T'HERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.33 AP - 00311550 6/22/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 5.46 AP - 00311550 6/22/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.81 AP - 00311550 6/22/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 78.46 AP - 00311550 6/22/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 71.08 AP - 00311550 6/22/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.75 AP - 00311550 6/22/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 154.94 AP - 00311550 6/22/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.21 AP - 00311550 6/22/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 21.11 AP - 00311550 6/22/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.07 AP - 00311550 6/22/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 42.57 AP - 00311550 6/22/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.32 AP - 00311550 6/22/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.21 AP - 00311550 6/22/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.06 AP - 00311550 6/22/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 44.44 AP - 00311550 6/22/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.21 AP - 00311550 6/22/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.59 AP - 00311550 6/22/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.21 AP - 00311550 6/22/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 59.99 AP - 00311550 6/22/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 349.76 AP - 00311550 6/22/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 612.13 AP - 00311550 b/22/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 568.30 AP - 00311550 6/22/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.34 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 33 Current Date: 06/30/201 Report: CK_AGENDA R EG PORTRAIT RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 07:15:1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P52 Agenda Check ReEister 6/8/2011 through 6/28/2011 Check No: Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00311550 6/22/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 038 AP - 00311550 6/22/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON .26.61 AP - 00311550 6/22/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 21.45 AP - 00311550 6/22/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 165.61 AP - 00311550 6/22/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 73.47 AP - 00311550 6/22/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 116.81 AP - 00311550 6/22/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 33.1 T AP - 00311550 6/22/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 32.80 AP - 00311550 6/22/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 41.85 AP - 00311550 6/22/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 75.43 AP - 00311550 6/22/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 65.93 AP - 00311550 6/22/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.33 AP - 00311550 6/22/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 538.41 AP - 00311550 6/22/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.21 AP - 00311550 6/22/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 289.16 AP - 00311550 6/22/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.41 AP - 00311550 6/22/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 71.55 AP - 00311550 6/22/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 167.21 AP - 00311550 6/22/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 162.28 AP - 00311550 6/22/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.06 AP - 00311550 6/22/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.21 AP - 00311550 6/22/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 46.07 AP - 00311550 6/22/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 81.25 AP - 00311550 6/22/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 78.64 AP - 00311551 6/22/2011 SOUTHLAND SPORTS OFFICIALS 782.00 AP - 00311552 6/22/2011 SPOONFACTORY 2.10.00 AP - 00311552 6/22/2011 SPOONFACTORY 1,960.00 AP - 00311552 6/22/2011 SPOONFACTORY 3,150.00 AP - 00311552 6/22/2011 SPOONFACTORY 650.00 AP - 00311552 6/22/2011 SPOONFACTORY 1,850.00 AP - 00311553 6/22/2011 STEINY AND COMPANY INC 22,044.92 AP - 00311553 6/22/2011. STEINY AND COMPANY INC -2,204.49 AP - 00311553 6/22/2011 STEINY AND COMPANY INC 65,122.63 AP - 00311553 6/22/2011 STEINY AND COMPANY INC -6,512.26 AP - 00311554 6/22/2011 SWANK MOTION PICTURES INC 171.00 AP -00311554 6/22/2011 SWANK MOTION PICTURES INC 321.00 AP - 00311556 6/22/2011 TAGLE, ELIZABETH 80.00 AP - 00311557 6/22/2011 TANG, WAI KIT 203.00 AP - 00311558 6/22/2011 THERMAL COMBUSTION INNOVATORS INC 70.09 AP - 00311558 6/22/2011 THERMAL COMBUSTION INNOVATORS INC 69.65 AP - 00311558 6/22/2011 THERMAL COMBUSTION INNOVATORS INC 91.20 AP - 00311558 6/22/2011 THERMAL COMBUSTION INNOVATORS INC 155.33 AP - 00311558. 6/22/2011 THERMAL COMBUSTION INNOVATORS INC 140.13 AP - 00311559 6/22/2011 TICKETS COM INC 978.09 AP - 00311562 6/22/2011 U S LEGAL SUPPORT INC 130.96 AP - 00311562 6/22/2011 U S LEGAL SUPPORT INC 121.00 AP - 00311562 6/22/2011 U S LEGAL SUPPORT INC 216.19 AP - 00311562 6/22/2011 U S LEGAL SUPPORT INC 49.75 AP - 00311562 6/22/2011 U S LEGAL SUPPORT INC 49.75 AP - 00311562 6/22/2011 U S LEGAL SUPPORT INC 102.50 AP - 00311562 6/22/2011 U S LEGAL SUPPORT INC 49.75 AP - 00311562 6/22/2011 U S LEGAL SUPPORT INC 45.74 AP - 00311564 6/22/2011 UPS 58.55 AP - 00311564 6/22/2011 UPS 20.00 _ _ User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 34 Current Date: 06/30/201 Report: CK_AGENDA R EG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 07:15:1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 6/8/2011 through 6/28/2011 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00311564 6/22/2011 UPS 24.51 AP - 00311565 6/22/2011 VASTA, WILLIAM 407.81 AP - 00311567 6/22/2011 VERIZON BUSINESS 1,852.88 AP - 00311568 6/22/2011 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 79.27 AP - 00311568 6/22/2011 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 114.18 AP - 00311568 6/22/2011 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 73.83 AP - 00311568 6/22/2011 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 18.03 AP - 00311568 6/22/2011 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 38.06 AP - 00311568 6/22/2011 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 78.90 AP - 00311568 6/22/2011 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 38.06 AP - 00311568 6/22/2011 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 18.54 AP - 00311568 6/22/2011 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 36.89 AP - 00311568 6/22/2011 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 38.06 AP - 00311568 6/22/2011 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 37.53 AP - 00311568 6/22/2011 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 583.89 AP - 00311568 6/22/2011 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 39.94 AP - 00311568 6/22/2011 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 114.24 AP - 00311569 6/22/2011 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 85.09 AP - 00311575 6/22/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 38.01 AP - 00311575 6/22/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 38.01 AP - 00311575 6/22/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 38.01 AP - 00311575 6/22/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 36.27 AP - 00311575 6/22/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 36.17 AP - 00311575 6/22/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 64.99 AP - 00311575 6/22/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 36.17 AP - 00311575 6/22/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 41.17 AP - 00311575 6/22/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 106.47 AP - 00311575 6/22/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 61.22 AP - 00311575 6/22/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 206.98 AP - 00311575 6/22/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 38.01 AP - 00311575 6/22/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 37.06 AP - 00311575 6/22/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 36.17 AP - 00311575 6/22/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 38.01 AP - 00311575 6/22/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 30.41 AP - 00311575 6/22/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 36.17 AP - 00311575 6/22/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 21.02 AP - 00311575 6/22/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 44.55 AP - 00311575 6/22/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 36.17 AP - 00311575 6/22/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 36.17 AP - 00311575 6/22/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 36.17 AP - 00311575 6/22/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 38.29 AP - 00311575 6/22/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 36.17 AP - 00311575 6/22/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 30.41 AP - 00311575 6/22/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 36.17 AP - 00311575 6/22/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 44.55 AP - 00311575 6/22/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 44.55 AP - 00311575 6/22/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 36.17 AP - 00311575 6/22/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 44.55 AP - 00311575 6/22/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 81.04 AP - 00311575 6/22/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 36.17 AP - 00311575 6/22/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 59.70 AP - 00311575 6/22/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 0.00 AP - 00311575 6/22/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 38.01 AP - 00311575 6/22/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 49.21 P53 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 35 Report:CK_AGENDA REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Current Date: 06/30/201 Time: 07:15:1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P54 Agenda Check Register 6/8/2011 through 6/28/2011 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount 1 AP - 00311575 6/22/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 36.17 AP - 00311575 6/22/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 36.17 AP - 00311575 6/22/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 36.17 AP - 00311575 6/22/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 36.17 AP - 00311575 6/22/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 36.17 AP - 00311575 6/22/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 36.17 AP - 00311575 6/22/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 36.17 AP - 00311575 6/22/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 36.17 AP - 00311575 6/22/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 36.17 AP - 00311575 6/22/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA ~' ~ 36.64 AP - 00311575 6/22/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 38.01 AP - 00311575 6/22/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 36.19 AP - 00311575 6/22/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 67.02 AP - 00311575 6/22/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 58.34 AP - 00311575 6/22/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 36.17 AP - 00311575 6/22/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 83.78 AP - 00311575 6/22/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 36.17 AP - 00311575 6/22/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 36.17 AP - 00311575 6/22/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 36.17 AP - 00311575 6/22/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 37.16 AP - 00311575 6/22/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 37.16 AP - 00311575 6/22/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 36.17 AP - 00311575 6/22/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 64.60 AP - 00311575 6/22/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 60.65 AP - 00311575 6/22/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 41.85 AP - 00311575 6/22/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 52.46 AP - 00311575 6/22/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 72.44 AP - 00311575 6/22/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 38.01. AP - 00311575 6/22/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 67.38 AP - 00311575 6/22/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 39.16 AP - 00311575 6/22/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 39.16 AP - 00311575 6/22/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 39.91 AP - 00311575 6/22/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 72.64 AP -00311575 6/22/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 41.66 AP - 00311575 6/22/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 39.16 AP - 00311575 6/22/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 37.16 AP - 00311575 6/22/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 39.16 AP - 00311575 6/22/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 42.16 AP - 00311575 6/22/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 42.16 AP - 00311575 6/22/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 42.16 AP - 00311575 6/22/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS- LA 42.16 AP - 00311575 6/22/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 42.16 AP - 00311575 6/22/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 47.15 AP - 00311575 6/22/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 45.15 AP - 00311575 6/22/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 72.84 AP - 00311575 6/22/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 47.15 AP - 00311575 6/22/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 38.16 AP - 00311575 6/22/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 40.46 AP - 00311575 6/22/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 44.74 AP - 00311575 6/22/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 44.52 AP - 00311575 6/22/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 49.96 AP - 00311575 6/22/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 39.41 AP - 00311575 6/22/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 37.62 AP - 00311575. 6/22/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA _ 62.90_ User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 36 Current Date: 06/30/201 Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 07:15:1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P55 Agenda Check Register 6/8/2011 through 6/28/2011 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00311575 6/22/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 39.16 AP - 00311575 6/22/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 0.13 AP - 00311575 6/22/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 36.17 AP - 00311575 6/22/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 36.29 AP - 00311575 6/22/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 38.16 AP - 00311575 6/22/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 53.89 AP - 00311575 6/22/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 39.99 AP - 00311575 6/22/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 35.41 AP - 003.11575 6/22/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 86.23 AP - 00311575 6/22/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 37.28 AP - 00311575 6/22/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 38.01 AP - 00311575 6/22/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 38.01 AP - 00311575 6/22/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 40.85 AP - 00311575 6/22/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 53.22 AP - 00311575 6/22/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 157.33 AP - 00311575 6/22/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 41.17 AP - 00311575 6/22/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 49.65 AP - 00311575 6/22/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 18.93 AP - 00311575 6/22/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 38.01 AP - 00311575 6/22/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA -42.00 AP - 00311575 6/22/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA -50.00 AP - 00311575 6/22/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA -50.00 AP - 00311575 6/22/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA -50.00 AP - 00311575 6/22/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA -50.00 AP - 00311575 6/22/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA -50.00 AP - 00311575 6/22/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA -50.00 AP - 00311575 6/22/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA -50.00 AP - 00311575 6/22/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA -50.00 AP - 00311575 6/22/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA -50.00 AP - 00311575 6/22/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA -50.00 AP - 00311575 6/22/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA -1,161.66 AP - 00311575 6/22/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 0.13 AP - 00311575 6/22/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 0.13 AP - 00311575 6/22/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 0.13 AP - 00311575 6/22/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 0.13 AP - 00311575 6/22/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 0.13 AP - 00311575 6/22/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 0.13 AP - 00311575 6/22/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 0.13 AP - 00311575 6/22/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 0.13 AP - 00311575 6/22/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 0.13 AP - 00311575 6/22/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 0.13 AP - 00311575 6/22/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 36.17 AP - 00311575 6/22/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 36.17 AP - 00311575 6/22/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 36.17 AP - 00311575 6/22/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 36.17 AP - 00311575 6/22/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 45.34 AP - 00311575 6/22/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 65.68 AP - 00311575 6/22/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 36.27 AP - 00311575 6/22/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 36.17 AP - 00311575 6/22/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 38.02 AP - 00311575 6/22/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 55.37 AP - 00311575 6/22/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 89.77 AP - 00311575 6/22/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 36.17 AP - 00311575 6/22/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA _ 59.74 _ User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 37 Current Date: 06/30/201 Report:CK_AGENDA REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 07:15:1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 6/8/2011 through 6/28/2011 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00311575 6/22/2011 ' VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 69.94 AP - 00311575 6/22/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 97.92 AP - 00311575 6/22/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 36.17 AP - 00311575 6/22/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 36.17 AP - 00311575 6/22/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 36.19 AP - 00311575 6/22/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 30.41 AP - 00311575 ~ 6/22/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 36.17 AP - 00311575 6/22/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 61.17 AP - 00311575 6/22/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA ~ 41.16 AP - 00311575 6/22/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 38.01 AP - 00311575 6/22/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 103.24 AP - 00311575 6/22/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 36.17' AP - 00311575 6/22/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 92.32 AP - 00311575 6/22/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 54.63 AP - 00311575 6/22/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 36.17 AP - 00311575 6/22/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 18.93 AP - 00311575 6/22/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 0.27 AP - 00311575 6/22/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 38.01 AP - 00311575 6/22/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 0.00 AP - 00311575 6/22/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 0.13 AP - 00311575 6/22/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 0.13 AP - 00311575 6/22/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 1.13 AP - 00311575 6/22/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 0.13 AP - 00311575 6/22/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 102.92 AP - 00311575 6/22/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 36.29 AP - 00311575 6/22/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 41.17 AP - 00311575 6/22/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 42.99 AP - 00311575 6/22/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 45.15 AP - 00311575 6/22/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 36.65 AP - 00311575 6/22/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 44.03 AP - 00311575 6/22/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 46.18 AP - 00311575 6/22/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 41.17 AP - 00311575 6/22/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 60.79 AP - 00311575 6/22/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 54.38 AP - 00311575 6/22/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 33.40 AP - 00311575 6/22/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 39.66 AP - 00311575 6/22/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 45.40 AP - 00311575 6/22/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 163.35 AP - 00311575 6/22/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 42.16 AP - 00311575 6/22/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 45.15 AP - 00311575 6/22/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 79.76 AP - 00311575 6/22/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 36.19 AP - 00311575 6/22/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA _92.98 AP - 00311575 6/22/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 59.96 AP - 00311575 6/22/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 37.55 AP - 00311575 6/22/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 101.66 AP - 00311575 6/22/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 38.01 AP - 00311575 6/22/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 39.16 AP - 00311575 6/22/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 67.06 AP -.00311575 6/22/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 70.92 AP - 00311575 6/22/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 83.53 AP - 00311575 6/22/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 80.41 AP - 00311575 6/22/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 64.57 AP - 00311575 6/22/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 63.15 P56 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 38 Report:CK_AGENDA REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Current Date: 06/30/201 Time: 07:15:1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P57 Agenda Check Register 6/8/2011 through 6/28/2011 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00311575 6/22/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 63.33 AP - 00311575 6/22/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 41.16 AP - 00311575 6/22/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 59.66 AP - 00311575 6/22/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 59.66 AP - 00311575 6/22/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 59.74 AP - 00311575 6/22/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 61.49 AP - 00311575 6/22/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS' - LA 59.66 AP - 00311575 6/22/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 59.66 AP - 00311575 6/22/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 63.90 AP - 00311575 6/22/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA ~" 72.77 AP - 00311575 6/22/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 73.74 AP - 00311575 6/22/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 36.17 AP - 00311575 6/22/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 36.17 AP - 00311575 6/22/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 30.41 AP - 00311575 6/22/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 30.41 AP - 00311576 6/22/2011 Verizon 31.27 AP - 00311577 6/22/2011 VISION COMMUNICATIONS CO 200.00 AP - 00311578 6/22/2011 WANG, JULIE 80.00 AP - 00311579 6/22/2011 WARREN & CO INC, CARL 238.55 AP - 00311579 6/22/2011 WARREN & CO INC, CARL 246.24 AP - 00311579 6/22/2011 WARREN & CO INC, CARL 561.74 AP - 00311579 6/22/2011 WARREN & CO INC, CARL 1,054.22 AP - 00311579 6/22/2011 WARREN & CO INC, CARL. 1,085.00 AP - 00311579 6/22/2011 WARREN & CO INC, CARL 69.26 AP - 00311579 6/22/2011 WARREN & CO INC, CARL 630.99 AP - 00311579 6/22/2011 WARREN & CO INC, CARL 677.16 AP - 00311580 6/22/2011 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 38.91 AP - 00311582 6/23/2011 CASTILLO, FRANK 432.00 AP - 00311582 6/23/2011 CASTILLO, FRANK 120.00 AP - 00311584 6/23/2011 AUTO BODY 2000 78.20 AP - 00311585 6/23/2011 BRODART BOOKS 18,635.40 AP - 00311585 6/23/2011 BRODART BOOKS 16,305.98 AP - 00311590 6/23/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 164.84 AP - 00311590 6/23/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 135.29 AP - 00311590 6/23/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 166.51 AP - 00311590 6/23/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 157.70 AP - 00311590 6/23/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 101.09 AP - 00311590 6/23/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 294.59 AP - 00311590 6/23/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 214.36 AP - 00311590 6/23/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 62.14 AP - 00311590 6/23/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 62.14 AP - 00311590 6/23/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 139.33 AP - 00311590 6/23/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 139.33 AP - 00311590 6/23/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 343.15 AP - 00311590 6/23/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 163.11 AP - 00311590 6/23/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 335.46 AP - 00311590 6/23/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 538.48 AP - 00311590 6/23/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 156.01 AP - 00311590 6/23/2011 CUCAMONGA~VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 305.19 AP - 00311590 6/23/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 358.93 AP - 00311590 6/23/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 264.35 AP - 00311590 6/23/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 120.66 AP - 00311590 6/23/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 120.66 AP - 00311590 6/23/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 234.22 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez ~ Page: 39 Current Date: 06/30/201 Report: CK_AGENDA R EG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 07:15:1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 6/8/2011 through 6/28/2011 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00311590 6/23/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 704.85 AP - 00311590 6/23/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 438.45 AP - 00311590 6/23/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 275.06 AP - 00311590 6/23/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 281.73 AP - 00311590 6/23/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 490.07 AP - 00311590 6/23/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 908.60 AP - 00311590 6/23/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 463.42 AP - 00311590 6/23/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT ~ 622.13 AP - 00311590 6/23/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 783.11 AP - 00311590 6/23/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 473.36 AP - 00311590 6Y23/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,275.53 AP - 00311590 6/23/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 154.57 AP - 00311590 6/23/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,134.69 AP - 00311590 6/23/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 997.74 AP - 00311590 6/23/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,132.55 AP - 00311590 6/23/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 991.32 AP - 00311590 6/23/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 198.93 AP - 00311590 6/23/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 622.98 AP - 00311590 6/23/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 459.79 AP - 00311590 6/23/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 125.46 AP - 00311590 6/23/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 807.74 AP - 00311590 6/23/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 189.61 AP - 00311590 6/23/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 605.98 AP - 00311590 6/23/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 366.84 AP - 00311590 6/23/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 882.38 AP -00311590 6/23/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 82.03 AP - 00311590 6/23/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 902.55 AP - 00311590 6/23/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 158.28 AP - 00311590 6/23/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 349.92 AP - 00311590 6/23/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 591.98 AP - 00311590 6/23/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 198.41 AP - 00311590 6/23/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 297.78 AP - 00311590 6/23/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 170.53 AP - 00311590 6/23/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 226.30 AP - 00311590 6/23/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 316.60 AP - 00311590 6/23/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 444.24 AP - 00311590 6/23/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 225.89 AP - 00311590 6/23/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 164.66 AP - 00311590 6/23/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 378.01 AP - 00311590 6/23/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 198.24 AP - 00311590 6/23/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 321.71 AP - 00311590 6/23/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,247.98 AP - 00311590 6/23/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 282.55 AP - 00311590 6/23/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 82.75 AP - 00311590 6/23/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 68.49 AP - 00311590 6/23/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 203.58 AP - 00311590 6/23/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 187.98 AP - 00311590 6/23/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 132.93 AP - 00311590 6/23/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 184.65 AP - 00311590 6/23/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 8,827.52 AP - 00311590 6/23/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT . 1,572.49 AP - 00311590 6/23/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 24.16 AP - 00311590 6/23/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 847.75 AP - 00311590 6/23/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 530.91 P58 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 40 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Current Date: 06/30/201 Time: 07:15:1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 6/8/2011 through 6/28/2011 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00311590 6/23/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 659.72 AP - 00311590 6/23/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,190.65 AP - 00311590 6/23/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,838.68 AP - 00311590 6/23/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,283.90 AP - 00311590 6/23/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 163.55 AP - 00311590 6/23/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 325.05 AP - 00311590 6/23/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,193.19 AP - 00311590 6/23/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 215.65 AP - 00311590 6/23/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 253.02 AP - 00311590 6/23/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 260.71 AP - 00311590 6/23/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 271.03 AP - 00311590 6/23/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 135.92 AP - 00311590 6/23/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 199.78 AP - 00311590 6/23/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,059.29 AP - 00311590 6/23/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 173.69 AP - 00311590 6/23/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 170.99 AP - 00311590 6/23/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 163.49 AP - 00311590 6/23/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 300.53 AP - 00311590 6/23/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 149.95 AP - 00311590 6/23/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 49.61 AP - 00311590 6/23/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 120.20 AP - 00311590 6/23/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 136.16 AP - 00311590 6/23/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 170.64 AP - 00311590 6/23/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 114.27 AP - 00311590 6/23/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 104.81 AP - 00311590 6/23/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 141.79 AP - 00311590 6/23/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 822.01 AP - 00311590 6/23/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 250.78 AP - 00311590 6/23/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 48.65 AP - 00311590 6/23/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 143.00 AP - 00311590 6/23/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 259.08 AP - 00311590 6/23/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 250.10 AP - 00311590 6/23/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 120.49 AP - 00311590 6/23/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 50.98 AP - 00311590 6/23/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER. DISTRICT 51.92 AP - 00311590 6/23/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 262.62 AP - 00311590 .6/23/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 64.50 AP - 00311590 6/23/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 274.98 AP - 00311590 6/23/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 317.12 AP - 00311590 6/23/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 860.42 AP - 00311590 6/23/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 149.34 AP - 00311590 6/23/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 752.60 AP - 00311590 6/23/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 722.06 AP - 00311590 6/23/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 407.67 AP - 00311590 6/23/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 607.96 AP - 00311590 6/23/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 163.88 AP - 00311590 6/23/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 310.10 AP - 00311590 6/23/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT - 121.03 AP - 00311590 6/23/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 212.90 AP - 00311590 6/2312011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 211.34 AP - 00311590 6/23/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 82.87 AP - 00311590 6/23/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 132.63 AP - 00311590 6/23/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 158.54 AP - 00311590 6/23/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 73.60 P59 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 41 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Current Date: 06/30/201 Time: 07:15:1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 6/8/2011 through 6/28/2011 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00311590 6/23/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 73.60 AP - 00311590 6/23/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 73.60 AP - 00311590 6/23/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 149.03 AP - 00311590 6/23/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 50.59 AP - 00311590 6/23/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 85.46 AP - 00311590 6/23/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 231.95 AP - 00311590 6/23/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 66.19 AP - 00311590 6/23/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 108.04 AP - 00311590 6/23/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 69.69 AP - 00311590 6/23/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 137.65 AP - 0031.1590 6/23/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 97.87 AP - 00311590 6/23/2011. CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 183.46 AP - 00311591 6/23/2011 DAISY WHEEL RIBBON CO INC 5,270.16 AP - 00311591 6/23/2011 DAISY WHEEL RIBBON CO INC 148.91 AP - 00311592 6/23/2011 DAPPER TIRE CO 3,867.12 AP - 00311592 6/23/2011 DAPPER TIRE CO 511.49 AP - 00311593 6/23/2011 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 807.24 AP - 00311594 6/23/2011 INTERSTATE BATTERIES 68.80 AP - 00311594 6/23/2011 INTERSTATE BATTERIES 618.05 AP - 00311595 6/23/2011 LAB SAFETY SUPPLY INC 237.36 AP - 00311596 6/23/2011 MAIN STREET SIGNS 461.05 AP - 00311596 6/23/2011 MAIN STREET SIGNS 157.36 AP - 00311596 6/23/2011 MAIN STREET SIGNS 149.53 AP - 00311597 6!23/2011 NEC UNIFIED SOLUTIONS INC 243.00 AP - 00311597 6/23/2011 NEC UNIFIED SOLUTIONS INC 670.00 AP - 00311598 6/23/2011 SUNRISE FORD 84.39 AP - 00311599 6/23/2011 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 1,275.84 AP - 00311599 6/23/2011 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 131.40 AP - 00311600 6/23/2011 TW TELECOM 4,009.66 AP - 00311600 6/23/2011 TW TELECOM 4,051.84 Total for Check ID AP: 1,940,785.44 EP - 00001844 6/8/2011 MACDONALD, JAMIE 1,070.00 EP - 00001844 6/8/2011 MACDONALD, JAMIE 130.05 EP - 00001845 6/15/2011 CALIF GOVERNMENT VEBA/RANCHO CUCAMC 1,100.00 EP - 00001845 6/15/2011 CALIF GOVERNMENT VEBA/RANCHO CUCAMC 9,150.00 EP - 00001846 6/15/2011 CHAFFEY JOINT UNION HS DISTRICT 1,290.30 EP - 00001847 6/15/2011 FORTISTAR METHANE GROUP LLC 112,657.96 EP - 00001847 6/15/2011 FORTISTAR METHANE GROUP LLC 92,071.90 EP - 00001848 6/15/2011 RIVERSIDE, CITY OF 5,807.00 EP - 00001849 6/15/2011 VERNON LIGHT & POWER, CITY OF 262,640.00 EP - 00001850 6/15/2011 VIASYN INC 3,091.00 EP - 00001851 6/22/2011 SEMPRA GENERATION 3,000.00 Total for Check ID EP: 492,008.21 Total for Entity: 2,432,793.65 P60 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 42 Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Current Date: 06/30/201 Time: 07:15:1 STAFF REPORT PLANNING DEPARTMENT P61 RANCHO C,UCAMONGA DATE: July 6, 2011 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: James Troyer AICP, Planning Director BY: Larry Henderson AICP, Principal Planner SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE 2011 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY NON-MOTORIZED TRANSPORTATION PLAN FOR THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AS AN UPDATE TO THE PREVIOUSLY ADOPTED 2008 NON-MOTORIZED TRANSPORTATION PLAN, IN ORDER TO QUALIFY. FOR CERTAIN GRANT FUNDS, SUCH AS THE BICYCLE TRANSPORTATION ACCOUNT (BTA) PROGRAM RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the 2011 San Bernardino County Non-Motorized Transportation Plan and, the City's Bicycle Transportation Plan by the adoption of the attached Resolution. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: The City of Rancho Cucamonga's 2010 General Plan Update envisions an extensive bicycle and pedestrian trail system. In order to qualify for certain grant funds, such as the Bicycle Transportation Account (BTA) program, the City must prepare a local Bicycle Transportation Plan and be approved by the Caltrans Bicycle Facilities Unit. The responsible agency for regional transportation planning, the San Bernardino Associated Governments (SANBAG), has prepared aNon-Motorized Transportation Plan 2011 Update for San Bernardino County, which fulfills all requirements of a Bicycle Transportation Plan in Section 891.2 (a-k) of the Streets and Highways Code. Caltrans policy allows the City to adopt the San Bernardino County Non-Motorized Transportation Plan 2011 Update, as our Bicycle Transportation Plan. The attached Local Plan Section provides information relevant to our community. CONCLUSION: The adoption of this Bicycle Transportation Plan implements the Mobility and air quality policies of the 2010 General Plan Update, in particular: Policy CM-1.2: Provide an integrated network of roadways that provides for convenient automobile, transit, bicycle, and pedestrian circulation movement around the City. Discussion: This policy recognizes that not all streets need to serve all transportation modes, but that certain streets may also need to fully allow for the efficient and convenient use by travel modes other than the automobile. Policy CM-2.1: Facilitate bicycling and walking citywide. Discussion: The Community Mobility Chapter supports alternative transportation options;. including bicycling and walking that are sustainable modes and contribute to a Healthy RC. P62 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT DRC2011-00661 2011 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY NON-MOTORIZED TRANSPORTATION PLAN FOR THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA July 6, 2011 Page 2 Policy CM-2.2: Encourage all feasible measures to reduce total vehicle miles traveled by automobiles, including enhanced transit access and land use approaches that provide compact and focused development along major transit corridors. Discussion: Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) is the total number of miles driven by all vehicles within a given time period and geographic area. VMT can be significantly reduced by the following land use and transportation attributes: placing new development in already developed areas; higher residential densities; providing a variety of walking-distance destinations; convenient bicycle options; and frequent, reliable, and comfortable transit service. Policy CM-3.7: Continue to develop and maintain a citywide bicycle network of off-street bike paths, on-street bike lanes, and bike streets to provide connections between neighborhoods, schools, parks, civic center/facilities,,recreationa/ facilities, and major commercial centers. Discussion: The Bikeways Plan, Figure CM-6, will be the basis for implementing a system of Class 1, Class ll, and Class 111 bike paths. The Trails Implementation Plan will be updated to maintain consistency with the General Plan. Policy CM-3.15: Coordinate the provision of the non-motorized networks (bicycle and pedestrian) with adjacent jurisdictions to maximize sub-regional connectivity. Discussion: The Pacific Electric Trail is planned to connect with neighboring jurisdictions, including Fontana, Rialto, Upland, and Claremont. Planned bike paths along Deer Creek. and Cucamonga Channel are intended to connect to bicycle facilities in Ontario. Policy PS-11.6: Pursue strategies and capital improvements that allow safe routes for children to walk or bike to school to reduce the need for automobile trips. Discussion: Safe Routes to Schools is a national program that assists communities in enabling and encouraging children to safely walk and bike to school by providing funding to create safe routes through infrastructure improvements. In 2008, Rancho Cucamonga received funding to launch a pilot program to educate children and their parents about the benefits of utilizing the Pacific Electric Trail as a safe route for walking and bicycling to school. The City will continue to pursue funding and strategies to encourage safe walking and bicycling to school. Policy PS-12.4: Provide enhanced bicycling and walking infrastructure, and support public transit, including public bus service, the Metrolink, and the potential for Bus Rapid Transit (BRT). Discussion: Transportation sources use the most energy and emit the most greenhouse gas emissions of any sector. A reduction of vehicle miles traveled reduces greenhouse gas emissions. Reduced vehicle miles can be accomplished through a number of methods including increased bicycle, pedestrian, and transit use, and locating employment opportunities and commercial goods and services closer to housing. Providing convenient ways to use alternative transportation encourages its use. P63 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT DRC2011-00661 2011 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY NON-MOTORIZED TRANSPORTATION PLAN FOR THE~CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA July 6, 2011 Page 3 Respectfully submitted, ~' Jam R. Troyer, AICP Planning Director JRT/LH/Is Attachments: 2011 San Bernardino County Non-Motorized Transportation Plan Local Section Draft Resolution Adopting the San Bernardino Non-Motorized Transportation Plan 2011 Update P64 San Bernardino County Non-Motorized Transportation Plan -Chapter 5 City of Rancho Cucamonga Population 177,736 City Overview Located at the base of the San Gabriel foothills, with majestic views of Cucamonga and Ontario peaks, Rancho Cucamonga is like no other community in the Inland Empire. Rancho Cucamonga's spirit of heritage stems from its history as a collection of three small communities: Cucamonga, Alta Loma, and Etiwanda. The area thrived on the agricultural fruits of citrus and grapes. This history is celebrated today through public art, evocative architecture, and well-preserved historic places. Historic Route 66 (Foothill Boulevard) traces across town, contributing to the nostalgia of the well-known and romanticized highway that still resonates with residents today. Land Use The map on the following page shows the current and future land use patterns in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. In the past the City has maintained a focus on developing a sustainable balance of residential, commercial and industrial development. Now that the City is 87 percent built-out, the City is focusing its efforts on the best use for remaining infill properties and guiding the redevelopment of aging commercial and industrial properties. Existing Conditions: Rancho Cucamonga boats a robust system of bikeways, including numerous Class I, II and III facilities. Portions of four Class (corridors-the Pacific Electric Trail, Cucamonga Creek Channel, Deer Creek Channel and Day Creek Channel-have been constructed for a total of 19.42 miles, transect the city providing a network of right-of-way separated from vehicular traffic and dedicated to non-motorized transportation. Additionally, 55.43 miles of striped Class II bike lanes have been striped throughout the City. The bike lanes provide connectivity to the Class I facilities and, provide access to commercial, residential, educational and recreational amenities throughout the city. Finally, 44.95 miles of signed Class III facilities, or bike routes, have been designated throughout Rancho Cucamonga. The current Class III facilities tend to be on either lower volume corridors or corridors that are schedule to become Class II facilities in the future as pavement and striping is rehabilitated. 5-104 P65 0 a .~ 0 0 c 0 Z 0 c a ~I m c m ~ o ~ ~ P66 a .~ C 2 0 c f0 a~i m wVI W O w~ W V V L C Q _~ ~F ~ :::~+e c „af+eo ~a.~• i..r.bao oe. a _~~-r~. , e o y i G a e: a D ~ ,~p ~ Y + _ ~"~ ...t~ ~ ~~~.~~~~~~~m~ i ~~~ ~.. k r'ti ~' ' j Ta~"''~5ok ~ ~ 1 ~~~ftS~~e S~ ~I]I ~ 7 ~ 2~ Q• ~, „~~ ~M ~ ~ t ' ' ~C S M ~ r 14 ~y ~` Y~ 1~ r fir.. ~~ ("~S" ~ ~ ~ ' V _ ~.a C BLS 3~`-4~~ ~~ ~ y ~ f Q~ IL y ~1 ~ y "'4441 ~" w`Y ~ M 7 '" a~ ~ / / { j ~ 'w ~ ~ - r ~ ~ }} ~ J a S iY ~ } ~ I 1 `.r ~ i ~ ~ ._..' ~ ~ ~ ( ~ ( ^ + ~V Tip ~~ ~ ~ _ i S ~ I I~tiv~~ ~I ' ~ a Y I• ~ ~~ 1 I X 'I ~ ' I ,i ~~" ~ ^ -' ~ ~ a s, ~ - ~ ~ ~ '~ a ~~. ....,. ~ • - ~ ~ - t •. • ~ ~ ~ ~ ~J ~Y ~..tv.N x& `,~, ~ ~ ,' ~ ^_.c ~~r~ _~ ~ fir,` a a~ ~ - - ~ Y e ~ +~a~. ~B~ s _ `~~ s~~ ..e oee8 ~! ~ ~" =1 r,r r ~f ~ :s I ~.•y ~ r ;~ E e z ~ Y: ~ •. ' ~!;"",~ ~.I ~ i ~ p ~ ..} i N M L 0 P67 San Bernardino County Non-Motorized Transportation Plan -Chapter 5 Table 5.70: Rancho Cucamonga Existing Conditions StreetlPath , From ., ~k To ~~, ~' ,. Class ~. Mdeage~~ s' st. , Cost 19th St W City Limit San Benito Ave III 3.49 $52,350 4th St (North side only) Buffalo Ave I-15 off ramps III 0.21 $3,150 4th St (North side only) I-15 off ramps Etiwanda Ave II 1.08 $54,000 Alberta PI Loyola Ct Menlo St I 0.03 $30,000 Arbor Ln Vinter Dr Cultural Center Dr II 0.37 $18,500 Archibald Ave N City Limit Hillside Rd III 0.74 $11,100 Archibald Ave Lemon Ave Base Line Rd II 1.25 $62,500 Archibald Ave Base Line Rd 4th St III 3.03 $45,450 Archibald Ave Hillside Rd Banyan Ave II 0.74. $37,000 Archibald Ave Banyan Ave Lemon Ave III 0.24 $3,600 Arrow Route Grove Ave Hellman Ave III 1.5 $22,500 Arrow Route Hellman Ave Etiwanda Ave II 4.5 $225,000 Banyan St Haven Ave Fredricksburg Ave II 0.7 $35,000 Banyan St Bluegrass Ave East Ave III 0.99 $14,850 Banyan St Fredericksburg Ave Milliken Ave III 0.3 $4,500 Banyan St Milliken Ave Bluegrass Ave II 1.51 $75,500 Banyan St East Ave Young's Cnyn Rd III 0.96 $14,400 Base Line Rd W City Limit Rochester Ave II 6.2 $310,000 Base Line Rd Rochester Ave Day Creek Blvd III 0.96 $14,400 Base Line Rd Day Creek Blvd I-15 II 2.63 $131,500 Carnelian St Almond St 19th St III 2.02 $30,300 Charleston St Melno St Fairmont Way I 0.23 $230,000 Church St Archibald Ave Center St III 0.74 $11,100 Church St Rochester Ave Victoria Gardens Ln II 1 $50,000 Church St Center St Haven Ave II 0.26 $13,000 Church St Haven Ave Rochester Ave III 1.97 $29,550 Coyote Dr Day Creek Blvd Duncaster PI II 0.18 $9,000 Cucamonga Creek Channel Demens Channel 19th St I 0.38 $380,000 Cucamonga Creek Ch. Base Line Rd Foothill Blvd I 1.14 $1,140,000 Day Creek Blvd Coyote Dr 2000' s/o Foothill Blvd II 5.68 $284,000 Day Creek Blvd 2000' s/o Foothill Blvd Rochester Ave III 0.35 $5,250 Deer Creek Channel Fourth St Highland Ave I 0.66 $660,000 Deer Creek Channel Base Line Rd. Highland Ave I 1.08 $1,080,000 Demens Channel Cuc. Creek Channel n/o Hillside Rd. I 2.01 $2,010,000 East Ave Wilson Ave Banyan St III 0.49 $7,350 East Ave Banyan Ave SR-210 II 0.46 $23,000 East Ave SR-210 Victoria St III 0.56 $8,400 East Ave Victoria St I-15 II 0.46 $23,000 East Ave I-15 Foothill Blvd III 1 $15,000 Elm Ave Bike Path Town Center Dr Rochester Ave I 1.77 $1,770,000 Etiwanda Ave Wilson Ave Base Line Rd III 2.02 $30,300 Etiwanda Ave Base Line Rd 250' s/o Church St II 0.53 $26,500 Etiwanda Ave 250' s/o Church St Foothill Blvd III 0.44 $6,600 Fairmont Way Charleston St Victoria Park Ln II 0.06 $3,000 5-107 P68 San Bernardino County Non-Motorized Transportation Plan -Chapter 5 ~ ~~ ~ . ~~ S,,treetlPath~,,~ _x "°' ~ ., _~ _, From 4+ u~ ~1`~~ ~' r.~`"?~a~,,, ~?''To~,~r.,~+~ ,~ ,Class„_ ~. ~'INileage~ Est `Gost:~,,.; Fairmont Way Highland Ave Kenyon Wy III 0.09 $1,350 Foothill Blvd Vineyard Ave Rochester Ave III 7.5 $112,500 Foothill Blvd Rochester Ave I-15 II 1.5 $75,000 Foothill Blvd I-15 Etiwanda Ave III 1 $15,000 Foothill Blvd Etiwanda Ave East Ave II 1.04 $52,000 Haven Ave SR-210 4th St II 8.04 $402,000 Haven Ave N City Limit SR-210 111 2.39 $35,850 Highland Ave San Benito Ave Fairmont Wy I 0.34 $340,000 Highland Ave Woodruff PI 350' w/o Rufino PI III 0.31 $4,650 Highland Ave 350' w/o Rufino PI Day Creek Blvd II 0.74 $37,000 Highland Ave Day Creek Blvd 680' e/o Etiwanda Ave III 0.9 $13,500 Highland Ave 680' e/o Etiwanda Ave 225' e/o DiCarlo PI II 0.33 $16,500 Highland Ave 225' e/o DiCarlo PI East Ave III 0.13 $1,950 Kenyon Wy Fairmont Wy Woodruff PI III 0.34 $5,100 Loyloa Ct Deer Creek Channel Alberta PI I 0.05 $50,000 Malaga Dr Church St Rochester Ave II 0.32 $16,000 Miller Ave Victoria Gardens Ln I-15 II 0.27 $13,500 Milliken Ave Wilson Ave SR-210 II 1.39 $69,500 Milliken Ave SR-210 Fairmont Wy III 1.27 $19,050 Milliken Ave Fairmont Wy Base Line Rd II 0.76 $38,000 Milliken Ave Base Line Rd Arrow Route III 3.14 $47,100 Milliken Ave Arrow Route 6th St II 2.04 $102,000 Milliken Ave 6th St 450' s/o 5th St III 0.68 $10,200 Milliken Ave 450' s/o 5th St 4th St II 0.32 $16,000 Pacific Electric Trail Grove Ave I-15 I 7.44 $7,440,000 Rochester Ave Victoria Park Ln Base Line Rd III 0.47 $7,050 Rochester Ave. Base Line Rd Foothill Blvd II 1.03 $51,500. Rochester Ave Foothill Blvd Arrow Route III 0.5 $7,500 Terra Vista Pkwy Church St Spruce Ave III 0.41 $6,150 Terra Vista Pkwy Spruce Ave Milliken Ave II 0.53 $26,500 Terra Vista Pkwy Milliken Ave Church St III 0.73 $10,950 Victoria Gardens L Church St Day Creek Blvd II 0.81 $40,500 Victoria Park Ln Fairmont Way Church St II 4.9 $245,000 Wardmand Bullock Rd/Youngs Canyon Rd Wilson Ave Cherry Ave II 1.74 ($87,000 Wilson Ave Carnelian St Archibald Ave III 1.33 $19,950 Wilson Ave High Meadow PI Milliken Ave II 0.13 $6,500 Wilson Ave Day Creek Blvd Etiwanda Ave III 0.76 $11,400 Wilson Ave Archibald Ave Haven Ave. II 1 $50,000 Wilson Ave Haven Ave High Meadow PI III 0.84 $12,600 Woodruff PI Highland Ave Kenyon Way III 0.15 $2,250 Total 111.49 $14,555,750 5-108 P69 San Bernardino County Non-Motorized Transportation Plan -Chapter 5 Past Investment in Non-Motorized Infrastructure The improvements included in Table 5.70: above constitute a significant investment into the non-motorized. transportation infrastructure of Rancho Cucamonga. Based on planning level estimates, the value of the improvements implemented throughout the City is $18,325,750. Proposed Improvements Rancho Cucamonga boasts an extensive network of non-motorized improvements. Future improvements to the non-motorized network continue to build additional connectivity throughout the system. Most future improvements focus on further development of additional Class II facilities, including the upgrade of most existing Class III facilities to Class II standards. However, the City also proposes to construct two additional Class (facilities-along portions of Etiwanda Ave. and Wilson Ave-as well as provide for several new Class II I corridors. A table of future improvements is included in Table 5.71: below. Table 5.71: Rancho Cucamonga Future Improvements _.,-~ 2 ~~ ~~' ~ s a sb ..:,~..p-~,Stree~lPath ~-rvv -~° fr~~'tsaS Y ~ rw.~i'~s~^ ,. , ,~o-,,.~FromU ~.~,,r,.~~ u~'• ~%•-x .~„ ~ x,z~7et _ ~o,~,~: .,,~~ ~^ t F ~,Class. ~,~ -~ - ESt' .. Mileage Cost 19th St W. City Limit San Benito Ave II 3.59 $179,500 4th St Cucamonga Channel I-15 off ramps II 6.19 $309,500 6th St Hellman Ave Etiwanda Ave. II 6.45 $322,500 Archibald Ave Banyan Ave Lemon Ave II 0.24 $12,000 Archibald Ave Base Line Rd 4th St II 3.03 $151,500 Arrow Route Grove Ave Hellman Ave II 1.5 $75,000 Banyan St Fredericksburg Ave. Milliken Ave. II 0.3 $15,000 Banyan St Bluegrass Ave East Ave II 0.99 $49,500 Banyan St East Ave Young's Cnyn Rd II 0.96 $48,000 Banyan St Sapphire St Haven Ave III 2.89 $43,350 Base Line Rd Rochester Ave Day Creek Blvd II 0.96 $48,000 Carnelian St Almond St 19th St II 2.02 $101,000 Church St Archibald Ave Center St. II 0.74 $37,000 Church St Haven Ave Rochester Ave. II 1.97 $98,500 Church St Hellman Ave Archibald Ave. III 0.5 $7,500 Cuc. Crk. Channel 4th St Foothill Blvd I 2.21 $2,210,000 Cuc. Crk. Channel Demens Channel Almond St I 1.76 $1,760,000 Day Creek Blvd 2000' s/o Foothill Blvd Rochester Ave II 0.35 $17,500 Day Creek Channel Banyon St Jack Benny Dr I 2.9 $2,900;000 Deer Creek Channel Base Line Rd 4th St I 3.18 $3,180,000 East Ave Wilson Ave Banyan St II 0.49 $24,500 East Ave SR-210 Victoria St II 0.53 $26,500 East Ave I-15 Foothill Blvd II 0.94 $47,000 5-109 P70 San Bernardino County Non-Motorized Transportation Plan -Chapter 5 e -~ ~ ~,.a c'"~u~~~ ~ " StreetlPath~+~ ~ ~ ~ Y, {~, From ,-zap ~ ~~-°~ ~ , ~ , ~ To ~~ ~';r .1 ,~.,,~ ~,~Class { r~~: 4Mlleage~, ~ ~~s~ Est~"~ , », ~Cost~; :~ Etiwanda Ave Wilson Ave Base Line Rd I 2.02 $2,020,000 Etiwanda Ave 250' s/o Church St 4th St II 2.45 $122,500 Foothill Blvd Grove Ave Rochester Ave II 9.61 $480,500 Foothill Blvd I-15 Etiwanda Ave. II 0.8 $40,000 Haven Ave N. City Limit SR-210 II 2.35 $117,500 Hellman Ave Hillside Rd 6th St III 4.83 $72,450 Hermosa Ave Hillside Rd Foothill Blvd III 3.27 $49,050 Hermosa Ave Foothill Blvd 4th St II 2 $100,000 Highland Ave Woodruff PI 350' w/o Rufino PI II 0.44 $22,000 Highland Ave Day Creek Blvd 680' e/o Etiwanda Ave II 0.77 $38,500 Highland Ave 225' e/o DiCarlo PI East Ave II 0.13 $6,500 Highland Ave Beryl St Hermosa Ave III 1.33 $19,950 Hillside Rd Sapphire St Hermosa Ave III 2.39 $35,850 Milliken Ave SR-210 Fairmont Wy II 1.22 $61,000 Milliken Ave Base Line Rd Arrow Route II 3.12 $156,000 Milliken Ave 6th St 450' s/o 5th St II 0.66 $33,000 Rochester Ave Highland Ave Base Line Rd II 1 $50,000 Rochester Ave Foothill Blvd 6th St II 1.3 $65,000 Sapphire St Hillside Rd 19th St II 1.53 $76,500 Terra Vista Pkwy Church St Spruce Ave II 0.41 $20,500 Terra Vista Pkwy Milliken Ave Church St II 0.72 $36,000 Wilson Ave Carnelian St Archibald Ave. II 1.33 $66,500 Wilson Ave Haven Ave High Meadow PI. II 0.84 $42,000 Wilson Ave Day Creek Blvd Cherry Ave t 2.87 $2,870,000 Wilson Ave Milliken Ave Day Creek Blvd II 1.25 $62,500 Total 94.34 $20,377,150 When complete, the City will have constructed an additional 93.58 miles of Class I, II and Class III facilities, providing additional internal connectivity to the residents of Rancho Cucamonga and increased connectivity to communities in the West San Bernardino Valley. The list of priority improvements for the City of Rancho Cucamonga is located in Table 5.72: below. The priority list includes additional connectivity to and from the Pacific Electric Trail and Day Creek Trail. Table 5.72: Priority Improvements ~.. _.. ....~_,..., ,. Street/Path ..M _ From , .. To ,, , ~ Class Mtlea a ...., w... 9~.,; ° Cost ~; ,.. Pacific Electric Connector Pacific Electric Trail Day Creek Channel Trail I 0.25 $250,000 Pacific Electric Trailhead Etiwanda Ave. 1,000 ft east I 0.23 $230,000 Day Creek Trail Pacific Electric Trail Highland Ave. I 0.66 $660,000 Deer Creek Channel Base Line Rd 4th St I 3.18 $3,180,000 Total 4.32 $4,320,000 5-110 P71 San Bernardino County Non-Motorized Transpon`ation Plan -Chapter 5 Municipal Code The City of Rancho Cucamonga municipal code includes the following two provisions governing the provision of non-motorized infrastructure: Bicvcle Storage: Bicycle storage spaces shall be provided in all multi-family residential projects of more than 10 units, commercial, office, and industrial districts in accordance with the following: • Minimum spaces equal to 5 percent of the required automobile parking spaces or 3 bicycle storage spaces, whichever is greater. After the first 50 bicycle storage spaces are provided, additional storage spaces required are 2.5 percent of the required automobile parking spaces. • Warehouse distribution uses shall provide bicycle storage spaces at a rate of 2.5 percent of the required automobile parking spaces with a minimum of a 3-bike rack. • In no case shall the total number of bicycle parking spaces required exceed 100. Where this results in a fraction of 0.5 or greater, the number shall be rounded off to the higher whole number. Bicvcle and Other Two-Wheel Vehicular Facilities. For developments with at least 40 total parking spaces, required on-site parking may be reduced at a rate of 1 automobile parking space per 4 spaces of bicycle storage, up to 50 automobile parking spaces or 10 percent of the total required on-site parking, whichever is less, where locker rooms and showers are provided for employees to promote bicycle commuting. The standard related to Bicycle and other Two-Wheel Vehicular Facilities only applies to Industrial Districts, and is aimed at promoting bicycle commuting where locker rooms and showers are provided. End of Trip Facilities The City of Rancho Cucamonga has bike lockers at the Rancho Cucamonga Metrolink Station and bike racks dispersed throughout the City. Multimodal Connectivity The City of Rancho Cucamonga has the following multimodal facilities that interface with the non-motorized transportation system. Table 5.73: Location of Multi-Modal Connections 5-111 P72 San Bernardino County Non-Motorized Transportation Plan -Chapter 5 .. r ' Facility n. Facihty~Type w. FacUity Locatton~- Rancho Cuc. Metrolink Station Train Station 11208 Azusa Court City-wide Bus Stops Bus Stops Throughout City Base Line PNR Lot Ride Share Lot 13231 Baseline Rd. Highland Ave Church PNR Lot Ride Share Lot 9944 Highland Ave. Collisions Involving Bicyclists Table 5.74: Data for Collisions Involving Bicyclists ~ ~Farameter -„ i } _ ~' _,,, ,,, .;~'^ Colhsrlon Rater, ~~; Total # of Bicycle Collisions from 2005-2009 91 Total # of Bicycle Fatalities from 2005-2009 3 Average # of Bicycle Collisions Per Year 18.2 Average Bicycle Collision Rate per 1000/year 0.11 Notes: 1. Rate is calculated using SWITRS collision data and population figures by the California Department of Finance Safety and Education Programs The City of Rancho Cucamonga and the San Bernardino County Sherrill hold an annual J safety program for children called the Ron Ives Bicycle Rodeo, with a goal to increase bicycle awareness and education among young riders. 5-112 P73 RESOLUTION NO. ~~-G~ ~~ r A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY NON-MOTORIZED TRANSPORTATION PLAN FOR THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA WHEREAS, the San Bernardino Associated Governments (SANBAG) has prepared a county-wide Non-Motorized Transportation Plan dated March 2011; and WHEREAS, SANBAG, acting as a regional transportation planning agency, is adopting the Non-Motorized Transportation Plan for purposes of establishing local jurisdiction eligibility for Caltrans' Bicycle Transportation Account (BTA) funds; and WHEREAS, the county-wide .Non-Motorized Transportation Plan is compliant with the Streets and Highways Code Section 891.2 and the Regional Transportation Plan (RTP);and WHEREAS, the county-wide Non-Motorized Transportation Plan contains sections that address cycling and walking issues and needs iri the City of Rancho Cucamonga; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council adopts the San Bernardino County Non-Motorized Transportation Plan for the purpose of establishing a document to guide the development of the local non=motorized system for cycling and walking. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 6th day of July , 2011 by the following vote: Signed: Attest: Date: STAFF REPORT _~ PUBLIC WORKS SERVICES DEPT-~RTMENT ,.. ~._. Date: July 6, 2011 RANCHO C;UCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager From: William Wittkopf, Public Works Services Director By: Julie Ungashick, Management Analyst II Subject: APPROVAL TO ACCEPT AND ALLOCATE $35,187 GRANT AWARDED BY THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FORESTRY AND FIRE PROTECTION ("CAL FIRE") INTO GENERAL FUND REVENUE ACCOUNT 1001000-4740 AND APPROPRIATE $35,187 INTO VARIOUS OBJECT CODES AS DETERMINED BY STAFF INTO EXPENDITURE ACCOUNT 1001316 (STREET AND PARK MAINTENANCE) FOR THE PURPOSE OF PLANTING TREES ALONG THE PACIFIC ELECTRIC TRAIL RECOMMENDATION It is recommended the City Council accept and allocate $35,187 received from the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection ("CAL FIRE") into General Fund revenue account 1001000-4740 and appropriate $35,187 into various object codes as determined by staff into expenditure account 1001316 (Street and Park Maintenance) for the purpose of planting trees throughout the Pacific Electric Trail. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS On January 19, 2011, City Council authorized staff to apply for a competitive grant being offered by The California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection ("CAL FIRE") for a project consisting of planting a total of 115 (15 gallon size) California native trees (California Sycamore and Valley Oak) in clusters along the PE Trail. Parks staff surveyed the length of the PE Trail and determined appropriate and viable locations for each cluster of trees. See attached map for tentative planting locations. In April, staff was notified of the award of $35,187 for this project. It is anticipated planting of the trees will be acommunity-involved project done with approximately 156 volunteers as directed by City staff and will occur during Fall 2011. Due to the fact that there is no permanent irrigation in place, Cal Fire agreed to provide funding for temporary irrigation measures to help the trees become established. There will be no direct impact to the General Fund. Matching funds of $32,319 will be provided by the City as in-kind use of existing City personnel, equipment, and volunteers. The terms of the grant stipulate the project be completed by March 30, 2013. Payments are done on a cost reimbursement basis. Resp Ily sub fitted, William Wittkopf Public Works Services Director P74 ,, a~ ~ ~'l ~.:~ ~... %'~_ '- WW/jau ~ ~~ l ~.~ r~-I- ~ ~~ _ - ~ ~ - ,~ -- ~ ~ •.- ~ ~ Z - a ~-- ~~ ~ 2 ~~~ ,:~---..BERYL ST ~..,_..,.._. y i ~, r--: . _..., GP I _..._. _. ' ~ .^. __ -~- ~ - _--AMETHYST AV- ~rl m r _~ ~ i ~~ ~~ -- - ~ t l1 ~a ®~ n ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ x o m ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~- ~ ~4 ~- A~ c'o .~ l - s~ I ~ -,- l_~. _. ~. --~; y ~ "' - 0 _ -_~-~~DAY~CRE c _. n ~~. ~ .._ . ~ ~ ~, ~ ~~ ~ '°~i6 e PPHIRE- ST ~- _ f} I' _ _'_. s.. w ~ ti~ .. , .,, ~..- - r i~~' '`~`$ _ _ ~`; ~~ MlLL1KEN AV - - -- ~ _ ,~ _ ~ ~ 5 =_ C €Pa la a ~ ~p_ n __...n- ._ .. a ~ ~ ~.,,_.._ ~, .o.j ___ , t~ J _ i ~~~ ,,. ~ ~3 g U _~ _ ~3 a --~ ~~_ _< ~g~ ~-i ~, ~ _ - ~ V N STAFF REPORT COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT Date: July 6, 2011 To: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager From: Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director By: Ryan Samples, Community Services Supervisor ~~~~ Subject: APPROVAL OF A RECOMMENDATION FROM THE PARK AND COMMISSION REGARDING THE PROPOSED FEE FOR THE USE COVE (POOL ROOM) AT THE JAMES L. BRULTE SENIOR CENTER RANCHO rL;UCAMONGA RECREATION OF BILLIARDS RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council approve a recommendation from the Park and Recreation Commission to implement a $12.00 annual use fee per participant and a $2.00 day pass fee for the use of Billiards Cove, the pool room, at the James L. Brulte Senior Center at Central Park. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS At the June 16, 2011 meeting of the Park & Recreation Commission, the Commission voted to recommend to the City Council a $12.00 annual fee and an alternative $2.00 per day fee for the use of Billiards Cove at the James L. Brulte Senior Center. The Park & Recreation Commission approved the fees after receiving a recommendation from the Senior Advisory Committee. The Senior Advisory Committee supports the implementation of the fees to support the on-going operations of the equipment in Billiards Cove. The original recommendation from the Senior Advisory Committee was only for an annual fee of $12.00, however the Park & Recreation Commission understands that many Billiards Cove patrons visit infrequently and recommended the addition of a per day fee as an alternative to the annual fee. An informal poll of the Billiards Cove participants by staff and various members of the Senior Advisory Committee indicate support for the implementation of a fee. As recommended, patrons of the Senior Center would choose between the annual fee or pay a fee for use of the room for one day. The annual fee will include a twelve month time period beginning on the registration date. The single day fee provides an option for those players who do not frequently utilize Billiards Cove. The fees would support the ongoing operations of the program and cover some of the direct costs associated with the program including the replacement of supplies (pool cues, balls) and the maintenance of the tables (re-felting, leveling) totaling approximately $1,600 per year. These fees are consistent with fees established for other programs with on-going operations expenses such as Wellness Pass and Table Tennis. Existing staff would register participants and monitor the adherence to the policy. Should the City Council approve the recommendation by the Park and Recreation Commission, it is anticipated that the new fees for the use of Billiards Cove at the James L. Brulte Senior Center would take effect on January 1, 2012. P76 P77 APPROVAL OF A RECOMMENDATION FROM THE PARK AND RECREATION COMMISSION REGARDING PAGE 2 THE PROPOSED FEE FOR'TI-IE USE OF BILLIARDS COVE (POOL ROOM AT TI-IE JAMES L. BRULTE SENIOR CEN'T'ER JULY 6, 2011 A copy of the staff report prepared for the Park & Recreation Commission has been attached for your reference. FISCAL IMPACT The total annual revenue collected would be approximately $900. The revenue represents approximately 75 unique Billiards Cove participants. Res a fully mitted, `~ Kevin M Ardle Community Services Director Attachment Item: L5. RDA -FIRE -CITY COUNCIL July 6, 2011 Approval of a recommendation from the Park and Recreation Commission regarding the proposed fee for the use of Billiards Cove (pool room) at the James L. Brute Senior Center. STAFF REPORT COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPAR'17~tENT Date: July 6, 2011 To: From: By: Subject: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager P76 RANCHO C,'UCAMONGA Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director Ryan Samples, Community Services Supervisor '~~~ APPROVAL OF A RECOMMENDATION FROM THE PARK AND RECREATION COMMISSION REGARDING THE PROPOSED FEE FOR THE USE OF BILLIARDS COVE (POOL ROOM) AT THE JAMES L. BRULTE SENIOR CENTER It is recommended that the City Council approve a recommendation from the Park and Recreation Commission to implement a $12.00 annual use fee per participant and a $2.00 day pass fee for the use of Billiards Cove, the pool room, at the James L. Brulte Senior Center at Central Park. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS At the June 16, 2011 meeting of the Park & Recreation Commission, the Commission voted to recommend to the City Council a $12.00 annual fee and an alternative $2.00 per day fee for the use of Billiards Cove at the James L. Brulte Senior Center. The Park & Recreation Commission approved the fees after receiving a recommendation from the Senior Advisory Committee. The Senior Advisory Committee supports the implementation of the fees to support the ongoing operations of the equipment in Billiards Cove. The original recommendation from the Senior Advisory Committee was only for an annual fee of $12.00, however the Park 8 Recreation Commission understands that many Billiards Cove patrons visit infrequently and recommended the addition of a per day fee as an altemative to the annual fee. An informal poll of the Billiards Cove participants by staff and various members of the Senior Advisory Committee indicate support for the implementation of a fee. As recommended, patrons of the Senior Center would choose between the annual tee or pay a fee for use of the room for one day. The annual fee will include a twelve month time period beginning on the registration date. The single day fee provides an option for those players who do not frequently utilize Billiards Cove. The fees would support the ongoing operations of the program and cover some of the direct costs associated with the program including the replacement of supplies (pool cues, balls) and the maintenance of the tables (re-felting, leveling) totaling approximately $1,600 per year. These fees are consistent with fees established for other programs with on-going operations expenses such as Wellness Pass and Table Tennis. Existing staff would register participants and monitor the adherence to the policy. Should the City Council approve the recommendation by the Park and Recreation Commission, it is anticipated that the new fees for the use of Billiards Cove at the James L. Brulte Senior Center would take effect on January 1, 2012. P77 APPROVAL OF A RECOMMENUA'I'ION HROM 'fHE PARK AND RECREATION COMMISSION REGARDING PAGE 2 THE PROPOSED FEE FOR'C'HE USE OF BILLIARDS COVE POOL ROOM AT THE JAMES L. BRULTE SEN10R CEN'CER ]uLY 6, 2011 A copy of the staff report prepared for the Park & Recreation Commission has been attached for your reference. FISCAL IMPACT The total annual revenue collected would tie approximately $900. The revenue represents approximately 75 unique Billiards Cove participants. Res a ully miffed, Kevin M rdle Community Services Director Attachment P77-1 STAFF REPORT COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT Date: To: From: By: Subject: June 16, 2011 Park and Recreation Commission RANCHO CUCAMONGA Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director Ryan Samples, Community Services Supervisor t. APPROVAL OF THE SENIOR ADVISORY COMMITTE RECOMMENDATION TO ESTABLISH A FEE FOR THE USE OF BILLIARDS COVE AT THE JAMES L. BRULTE SENIOR CENTER RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Park and Recreation Commission review and approve the recommendation from the Senior Advisory Committee to establish a fee for the use of Billiards Cove (Pool Room) at the James L. Brulte Senior Center. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS At the March 2011 meeting of the Senior Advisory Committee, the Committee voted to recommend to the Park 8 Recreation Commission a minimal fee for the use of Billiards Cove at the James L. Brulte Senior Center. Although staff and the committee strive to offer free and low-cost activities at the Senior Center, the Committee recommends that a $12.00 annual fee be established for the use of Billiards Cove. The fee would support the ongoing operations of the program and cover some of the direct costs associated with the program including the replacement of supplies (pool cues, balls) and the maintenance of the tables (reflecting, leveling) totaling approximately $1,600. This fee is consistent with fees established for other programs with on-going operations expenses such as Wellness Pass and Table Tennis. FISCAL IMPACT The total annual revenue collected would be approximately $900. The revenue represents approximately 75 unique Billiards Cove participants. Kevin N(~Ardle Community Services Director STAFF REPORT COMMUNITY SERVI~S DEPARTMENT RANCHO Date: July 6, 2011 C;UCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager From: Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director By: Dave Moore, Community Services Superintendent Subject: APPROVAL TO APPROPRIATE FUNDS INTO THE CAPITAL RESERVE FUND - CAPITAL SUPPLIES 025 ACCOUNT 1025001-5207 IN THE AMOUNT OF $30,249 AND AUTHORIZE THE PURCHASE OF SIX (6) BLEACHERS MANUFACTURED BY PW ATHLETIC MANUFACTURING CO. THROUGH THE PLAYWELL GROUP UTILIZING THE HOUSTON GALVESTON AREA COUNCIL (HGAC) BUY PROGRAM .CONTRACT PR 11-10 TO REPLACE THE CURRENT DONATED BLEACHERS AT ETIWANDA CREEK PARK IN THE AMOUNT OF $30,075 AND AUTHORIZE AN EXPENDITURE OF A 2% INSTALLATION COST CONTINGENCY IN THE AMOUNT OF $174 RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council approve the appropriation of funds into the Capital Reserve Fund Capital Supplies 025 account 1025001-5207 in the amount of $30,249 and authorize the purchase of six outdoor field seating .bleachers to be installed at Etiwanda Creek Park replacing six existing bleachers previously donated by the Pop Warner youth football organization. BACKGROUND/ANALYST S Approximately 18 years agog the Pop Warner youth football league donated eight sets of used wooden bleachers to the City for use at Etiwanda Creek Park, which had been donated to the league by a high school. Over the years, these bleachers have aged significantly and have required constant repair each year at Pop Warner's expense. Currently, six sets of these bleachers are beyond repair and are in need of replacement to insure the continued safety of park users. In addition to the seasonal use by the Pop Warner football league, these bleachers are also heavily used each year by youth soccer organizations and the adjoining middle school. Staff is recommending that six of the bleachers be replaced with new ones which meet current safety and accessibility standards, to be purchased by the City using the Capital Reserve Fund. Pop Warner league officials have graciously agreed to repair the remaining two sets of existing bleachers to keep them in use at the park. This plan has been developed in close cooperation with the current President of the Pop Warner league, who has expressed her appreciation to the City for the ongoing partnership and support. P78 P79 APPROVAL TO APROPRIATE FUNDS INTO THE CAPITAL RESERVE FUND AND AUTHORIZE THE PURCHASE OF SIXBLEAC~RS U7TLIZING THE HVACBUY PROGRAM Staff recommends purchasing these six new bleachers utilizing a competitively bid, HGAC BUY Contract (# PR 11-10) awarded to PW Athletic Manufacturing Co. Staff has evaluated the Master Contract, together with its exhibits and associated addendums. It has been determined that utilizing said contract as a piggyback option is the most advantageous method of procurement at this time and is considered to be in the City's best interest to approve and award to PW Athletic Manufacturing Co. Ily su Kevin M~Ardle ` Commurn v Services Director P80 ..9. r STAFF FPORT ENGINEERING SERVICES DEP_~R"t\IENT ' Date: July 6, 2011 RANCHO C,'UCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council ' Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager From: Mark A. Steuer, Director of Engineerin S,prvices/City Engineer B Fred L n, Utilities Division Manager Y Y Christen Mitchell, Management Aide Subject: APPROVAL TO ISSUE A SOLAR INCENTIVE REBATE TO SOLARMAX TECHNOLOGY, INC. FOR THE INSTALLATION OF A SOLAR PHOTOVOLTAIC SYSTEM AT CHILDREN'S DENTISTRY OF INLAND EMPIRE IN THE AMOUNT OF $68,130.26 TO BE FUNDED FROM 1706303-5209 MUNICIPAL UTILITY PUBLIC BENEFIT FUND. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council approves to issue a solar incentive rebate to SolarMax Technology, Inc. for the installation of a solar photovoltaic system at Children's Dentistry of Inland Empire in the amount of $68,130.26 to be funded from 1706303-5209 Municipal Utility Public Benefit Fund. BACKGROUND /ANALYSIS On August 21, 2006, former Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger signed Senate Bill 1 (SB-1) which aims to build 3,000 megawatts of solar photovoltaic system (PV) in California. SB-1 mandates that each Publicly Owned Utility adopt, implement and finance a solar initiative program on or before January 1, 2006, to assist the state in meeting that goal. Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility (RCMU) has committed to achieve 1.1 megawatts of solar PV in support of the statewide goal. RCMU has created a solar incentive program by which customers may qualify for a rebate once they satisfy certain system requirements. There are two types of rebates customers may qualify for - Expected Performance-Based Buydown (EPBB) or Performance Based Incentive (PBI). The Utility's Public Benefit Charge, which consists of 2.85 percent of electric retail revenues, are designated for qualifying public benefit programs including, but not limited to, energy efficiency and solar rebates. Current incentive rates and rebate equations are attached (Attachment A). RCMU's first solar customer, Children's Dentistry of Inland Empire installed a 28.153 kW system, qualifying them for an Expected Performance-Based Buydown (EPBB) rebate of $68,130.26. Typically, the rebate provides approximately a 15 percent-25 percent discount to the total system. The owner requested that RCMU issue the rebate directly to their contractor, SolarMax Technology, Inc. (Attachment B). The system size installed at Children's Dentistry is estimated to save 50,312 kWh of annual electricity consumption and reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 41.7 tons per year over the system's lifetime. RCMU will also own the excess renewable energy credits that the system produces.. Respec _ bmitted, ~ l_________, M - r Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer MAS/FL:rlf Attachments P81 ~~ Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility _ 10500 Civic Center Dr PO Box 2300 Rancho Cucamonga CA 91729-2300 RA"cH° C,UCAhfONGA (909) 477-2740 www. cityofrc. u s/RCM U Solar Incentive Program The Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility (RCMU) Solar Incentive Program is currently offering incentives for the installation of solar photovoltaic systems at the following rates: Calendar Year Expected Performance-Based Buydown EPBB , o en to s stems under 30 kW Performance-Based Incentive (PBI), re uired fors stems 30 kW or rester 2010 $2.42/watt $0.09/kwh 2011 $2.25/watt $0.08/kwh 2012 $2.09/watt $0.08/kwh 2013 $1.95/watt $0.07/kwh 2014 $1.81/watt $0.07/kwh 2015 $1.68/watt $0.06/kwh 2016 $1.57/watt $0.06/kwh 2017 $1.46/watt $0.05/kwh Eligibility: This program is open to all active RCMU customers in good standing. System Restrictions: Rated capacity of installed solar PV system cannot exceed the customer's historic peak demand. Estimated annual system output cannot exceed customer's previous annual consumption. System must conform to all applicable City, State, and Federal requirements, including but not limited to being installed by a licensed contractor, have a 10 year minimum warranty, and conform to all building codes. Incentive Restrictions: Lifetime incentive cannot exceed 50% of system cost. Eligible costs include design, installation, equipment and other expenses necessary to install system. RCMU reserves the right to modify program based upon participation and funding availability. Energv Audit: An energy audit of the building is required before installation of system. Renewable Energv Credits: RCMU retains ownership of renewable energy credits (RECs). Expected Performance-Based Buydown: This incentive option is available to customers installing a system with a rated capacity less than 30 kW. Customers will receive the listed incentive per watt installed as a one time payment. Customers cannot elect to do both the Expected Performance-Based Buydown and Performance-Based Incentives. EPBB Payment Amount = CEC-AC System Rating x Design Factor x EPBB Payment Rate Performance-Based Incentive: This incentive is available to all customers, but is required for those installing a system with a rated capacity 30 kW or greater. Customers will receive a monthly credit based on the metered production of their system (AC), paid at the given rate for 60 monthly billing cycles (5 years). PBI Payment Amount =Actual energy produced by solar system, measured in kilowatt-hours x PBI Rate Reservations: RCMU does not currently require an incentive reservation, but reserves the right to do so in the future based on program participation and funding availability. ATTACHMENT A P82 Dr. Joseph Chem; Children's Dentistry of Inland Empire 8209 Rochester Avenue, Suite 101 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility Attn: Christen Mitchell ] 0500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729-080? Re: Rebate Assignment ,(wlc 27'x', 2011 Dear Ms. Mitchell, The purpose of this letter is to confirm and verify the assignment of solar rebate for Children's Dentistry of Inland Empire to SolarMax Technology, Inc. in the amount of $68,130.26. Should you have any questions or concerns, please feel free to contact meat 909.484.9555. Thank you. Sincerely Yours, Dr. Joseph Cheng ATTACHMENT B P83 STAFF ]EZEPOI~T ENGINEERING SER\'ICEti DEP.~RTIIENT DATE: July 6, 2011 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Mark A. Steuer, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer BY: Willie Valbuena, Assistant Engineer RANCHO C;UCAMONGA SUBJECT: REQUEST OF CONSIDERATION FOR THE CITY TO ACQUIRE OFF-SITE PROPERTY FOR PUBLIC STREET RIGHTS-OF-WAY in conjunction with the development of Tentative Tract 18806, located on the north side of Base Line Road east of Etiwanda Avenue, submitted by LVD Rancho Cucamonga, LLC; any and all costs will be borne by the Developer RECOMMENDATION It is recommended the City Council consider this request to acquire off-site property for public street rights-of-way to facilitate the construction of Shelby Place on the north side of Base Line Road. City Council's review and acceptance of this report by minute action will provide direction to staff to pursue conditions of approval for Tentative Tract 18806 relating to an acquisition agreement. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The Developer of proposed Tentative Tract 18806 (Exhibit "B"), located on the north side of Base Line Road east of Etiwanda Avenue, with his first submittal of his development to the City proposed an emergency vehicular access at the existing signalized intersection of Shelby Place. This proposed emergency access parallels the existing dirt road extending north of Base Line Road. The developer made -this proposal because they were unable to obtain right-of-way from the adjacent property owner. City Staff requested the developer to change the submittal to delete the emergency access and show normal street improvements of Shelby Place. Construction of this intersection will allow the development to complete its Base Line Road frontage ahd improve access for existing homes to the east (Exhibit "C"). Without this access, Tentative Tract 18806 proposed 33 homes will be using the existing streets in two adjacent tracts to the east for access to Base Line Road and East Avenue, possibly resulting in complaints from the neighboring tracts regarding the additional traffic. In order to align the north and south Shelby Place centerlines across Base Line Road, the minimum allowable street width will encroach about 8 feet west of the west tract boundary. The existing private dirt road is within the adjacent 30-foot wide parcel. The proposed improvements for a minimum width public street (Exhibit "E"), will consist of 28 feet of pavement with curb, gutter, sidewalk and access ramps on the east side and a drive approach for the dirt road that will continue to provide access to other properties. Normally, Staff request that all off-site rights-of-way be obtained by the Developer prior to scheduling a project for a Planning Commission hearing. The Subdivision Map Act, Section 66462.5 (Exhibit "H"), states that once a tentative map has been approved, the City cannot withhold approval of the Final Map because rights-of-way for off-site improvements have not been acquired by the Developer. Therefore, the City is essentially obligated to acquire the easement for the Developer or that requirement is automatically waived. Placing a condition of approval upon Tentative Tract 18806 for an acquisition agreement will ensure the developer will be responsible for all costs should the City Council choose to pursue this acquisition. P84 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT -TRACT 18806 JULY 6, 2011 Page 2 The Developer has already initiated talks with the owner of the adjacent 30-foot wide parcel several times, but in the end the property owner decided not to sell a portion of their property (Exhibit "G"). Since the Developer does have alternate access, although it is less direct or desirable, he wants to move forward with processing the tentative map. If acquisition by the City does become necessary, the Developer will be responsible for all costs incurred, including the cost of obtaining the rights-of-way. If the City Council does not support the concept of public acquisition, Staff will require an interim gated emergency access to be provided east of the intersection until such time as the property west of the tentative tract develops. Also, the Developer will deposit funds for half of the cost of constructing a street upon future development. Respectfully submitted, f ~. F~ Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer MAS/WAV: rlf Attachments: Exhibit A: Exhibit B: Exhibit C: Exhibit D: Exhibit E: Exhibit F: Exhibit G. Exhibit H: Vicinity Map Tentative Tract Map Assessor's Map Acquisition Area Proposed Improvements Developer Letter to City Developer Letter to Lot Owner Subdivision Map Act city of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Division ,, ~~ __, ~, ;; ,;_ _._i i\._ .- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT N W ~ E S P85 ITEM: SUBTT18806 TITLE: VICIMTY MAP EXHIBIT "A" ~~~r~~~r~-~A~z . ;1' J; ,i ~. ~_~ .. --~_ _ ~ - , ~. ~; ' 1i I ~~1 ~~~.~ 4 1 ~~~ i k% ~; ~-~-~_..,., r i ~ 9 ~!_~' i ~ ~~ ~:~' 'N .. ~~~~ ~~ ~,' v Title: ~'~~f , ~/~~ _ `L ®~ `~~ P86 P87 - -311 N-3-~-tl - - -1-S Y-3 ~- - O O _ O I I r~ I- ~- c~ I !~ 1'~ i I~ I~ ~a lQ im O~ \ , !~ \ O O ~ :Ie O ~ Q -1a A63- _ _ - _ _ ly }H'MJ }J}- - - N O O m ~ . -~ ,~ ~~ a ~ ~ -`o o G` r 3 ~ ~y T ~ m f - ~ m. a \ ~ ~ ~ ~ °' .ir o : ~ O •-; C- . e, •~. r g ~ a 9f f O ' ,. , , O ~~ ~~ ~~ I ._ . O m ~ O G O O a ~ - 'err ~ - 1 O I ----=,scan- ----- ---- - ------ ---- -+++~t - '\ O ~ ~ „ ~ .., ~, ; ,,. _ ~ , i _ 1 .y -_ ~ o - a ... .. e - •• ~ T - " 0 - - - ~ ' r - - - e - . o - o - ,,, . , _ ~. _ - - '~ 9Q O ~, ~~ ~ I ~ a I~ a , l = s ii ~c Jb~V scr c ^ o Icc ) I r~~Ia kS e O 001 ° t O - ..c I I ~ i ~. L- . n r~- O O` OICGIOI O v ~~ o. O m . ~~ ~,.~, ~. W~ O _ f,~ o ` o° ~AS~, ~~ O _ ~ Ari 6Z'[Oi 5r I ae¢ as _J-~ -__-___ 'u n-P~m~llfTi~__ o ~ I I 00 ~ U ~' ~I ri ~ ~ ~~ O ~ O z ~ W ~ w ~ ~ w H W ~ _ F-+ H w ~ w O Q ~ w U_ U w v~ U :~ O ~ ~..~ -" ~. ~ ~ ~ F~-i U w P88 - ---- I I------- (GROUP lX BP PROPERTIES) I I r (MORA PROPERLY) I i -----~ L------ 1 I 30.00' I HATCH INDICATES 30' WIDE I I------- ACCESSSIRIP - ----~ i o o I ' I III (VIRA~NONIEZ PROPERLY) - I - - - - ~ I . U N I I - ---- i I L------ I - I -=---i I I I I ~------ i J (URENA PROPERLY) ~ ~~ `~ ~ ~ I ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~. ~ 0 BASELINE RDAD i _ _ _ ----- Q ARFA OF STRIP ACQUISITION APPROXIMATELY 195X30'* ~ ~' r~g~ ~a Item: W ~ Title: ~~~~1~®~+~ P89 FUTURE I r IMPROVEMENTS -____=====1= I -1~ I EDGE OF PAVEMENT I 30 INTERIOR STREER PER CITY STD 100-A ;. I: ... . ° .. - . DOUBLE YELLOW STRIPE ..26 ' ( '. jtY' I . p ACCESS RAMP • ~~ ~ ~' :~ :` 6 ~ PER CITY STD 102 .~ a ~. ~~;` ~; . .,1~~ .~ ~ 14 . j , , . ~I . .. • :.: SIGNAL TO BE ` ~ RELOCATED ' _ ~ r' 'i .. , , : . , . ?~: :---F- -- ~ ' .~ ~ -1 .:.. .J ~ i^~ (. 1 .. ~r ... '1 - - \~ I I ~ e~ RO,~D PER CITY STD 102-LOCAL ~. AN{? 40' CURB TO CURB WIOTrI I 0~l SOUTH SIDE OF BASE LINE I I ... I _.._-- II ---~- ~ ~_____ ~~ _- I I UTURE CURB AND GUTTER ~ ~ I __._ ~ ~ I I _ ~_. II ~ II ~ FUTURE ACCESS RAMP _ ~ I I I PER CITY STD_ 102__ .._~_._. I ~ . ~, I II ~ I I __._--- II 1 ~/ - - ~ ...r-~~~ ~~~._. ~ 1 i i - ......... _........ N TO REMAIN AS IS ~:_~l - _ _ _ - v _.___~._ i i CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT Z ITEM: SUBTT18806 TITLE: PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS EXHIBIT "E" P90 LVD Rancho Cucamonga, LLC. 1156 North Mountain Avenue / P. 0. Box 670 /Upland, California 91785-0670 Telephone: (909) 985-0971 FAX: (909) 949-6700 June 23, 2011 City of Rancho Cucamonga Attn: Dan James 10500 Civic Center Drive P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 RE: Etiwanda Estates: QRC2010-01005 and 5UBTT18806 Meeting Summary -June 22, 2011 Dear Mr. James: The purpose of this letter is to summarize our meeting held on June 22, 2011 where LVD Rancho Cucamonga, LLC ("Developer")and the City Engineering Department agreed that all required construction permits and Certificates of Occupancies shall not be withheld due to a pending Order of Possession required to construct the full intersection improvements at Base Line Ave and Shelby Ln. One of the following two scenarios shall unfold: Scenario 1: City Council agrees to proceed with the condemnation process; therefore, it is understood that Developer shall provide a temporary road over Lot 33. The temporary road shall provide adequate circulation for construction, model and emergency traffic purposes. Homeowner's will take access by way of Green Canyon Dr and Lot 33 will remain undeveloped until such time as the ultimate intersection is complete. Developer agrees to diligently pursue all aspects related to the condemnation process and construction of the intersection improvements. Developer shall execute an acquisition agreement which outlines funding requirements through the Order of Possession and Eminent Domain process. In the event the amount deposited by Developer does not cover the actual costs necessary to acquire the offsite property or Developer does not diligently pursue construction ofthe intersection after an Order of Possession is obtained; the City may halt future Building Permits or. Certificates of Occupancies until such time as Developer funds the deficiency or until such time as Developer resolves a construction delay to the City's satisfaction. ~ o~ ,~ Item: ~~~~~/~ Title:. ~t7 ' '~~T~ ~~ ~~ P91 Scenario 2: In the event the City Council does not support condemnation, Developer shall provide an access road off Base Line Rd for model, construction and emergency purposes. At project build-out, the access road off,Base Line ~Rd will remain in place for emergency vehicles only and all homeowners will take access via Green Canyon Dr. In either scenario, Developer shall complete, to the City's approval, the required public improvements and public landscaping that are not dependent upon the offsite acquisition property prior to receiving Certificates of Occupancies. To conclude, the project has two viable circulation solutions that will enable Developer to control its own destiny through the life of the project and will ensure the City has a successful project. Sincerely,/~ :.L/ Garth C ambers Project Manager Lewis Operating Corp Cc: Jon Gillespie-Traffic Engineer Tabe Van der Zwaag -Project Planner 2 Of 2 P92 Lewis Investment Company, LLC 1156 North Mountain Avenue / P.O. Box 670 /Upland, California 91785 Telephone: (909) 946-7501 /Fax: (909) 949-6720 August 25, 2010 Ms. Lupe Viramontez 7258 Private Road Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91739 Re: ~ Approximately 0.13 or 0.21 acres of APN 0227-131-09 {ocated north. of the Baseline Road and~Pecan Avenue intersection in Rancho Cucamonga, CA. Dear lVis. Viramontez: As we discussed during our meeting on August 16, 2010, Lewis Investment Company, LLC. or its assigns ("Lewis") would like to acquire from you and your family, The Viramontez Family Trust, a portion of the private road that provides access to your property. The acquisition of a portion of this road is needed to complete intersection improvements at the Baseline Avenue and Pecan Avenue intersection in Rancho Cucamoriga, CA. .See Exhbits "A" arid. Exhibit "B" for a general depiction of the properties in question. The intersection improvements contemplated by Lewis will provide a local benefit to not only your property, but all of the properties in the immediate vicinity. Benefits include: • Increased future development value of your property through the construction'of local infrastructure improvements, • Reduced road maintenance and liability borne by your family. as the City of Rancho Cucamonga will maintain the new public road, • .Improved a(I weather access to your property via a paved public road, • Improved safety at the Baseline Ave and Pecan Ave intersection through increased visibility, road widening and a dedicated turn lane. This Non-Binding Letter of Intent outlines the general terms and conditions of two separate alternatives in which Lewis would agree to purchase a portion of your private road. Property A is depicted in Exhibit "A"and Property B is depicted in Exhibit "B". . Option A Property A: Southerly 301' by 30' of the private road (The Red and Green property depicted on Exhibit "A"). Purchase Price: $40,000. Payment: All Cash at the close of escrow. Feasibility Period: 45 days from the execution of a Purchase Agreement. Deposit: $10,000 released upon approval of the Feasibility Period. Close of Escro4v: No later than six months following the approval of the Feasibility Period. i a~ ~ ` Item: ~~,~~~ ~~ L Title: ~" ,~~~ ~: ~~ ~~ ,~~~~, . Viramontez Property -Baseline Road ' Rancho Cucamonga, CA August 26, 2010 Page 2 Option B Property B: Southerly 195' by 30' of 'the private road (The Red property depicted on Exhibit "B"). Purchase Price: $20,000. Payment: All Cash at the close of escrow. Feasibility Period: 45 days from the execution of a Purchase Agreement. Deposit: $5,000 released upon approval of the Feasibility Period. Close of Escrow: No later than six months following the approval of the Feasibility Period. Lewis wiEl grant .your family a temporary easement over the Property should Close of Escrow occur prior to the completion and dedication of the new public road which will access your property. Lewis will also perform a Lot Line Adjustment along. the southern boundary of your 2.27 acre property. (APN 0227-131-10). This ,Lot Line Adjustment (depicted as the Blue property on both Exhibit "A" and Exhibit "B") wi(I increase your current property by approximately 885 feet (10' x 88.5') and will remedy the current property line discrepancy with the Urena Property to the south. Lewis' affiliate, Lewis Operating Corp. ("LOC"), is licensed by the California Department of Real Estate ("CA DRE") under CA DRE Broker Lic. # 01252241. Lewis is acting as a principal in this transaction and claims no commission or finder's fee in connection with this transaction. LOC's employee, Robert Martin., CA DRE Broker Lic. # 00963777, represented Lewis iri this transaction and claims no commission or finder's fee in connection with this transaction. This letter constitutes anon-binding ,express'son of our serious interest to purchase your property based upon the general terms outlined above. If you are interested in selling the property pursuant to these general terms, please let us know and we will begin preparation of the Purchase and Sale Agreement. Neither party shall be bound to proceed with this transaction until th letter shalt excireoon Septdember 4, 2010 cceptable Purchase and Sale Agreement. This p Sincerely, LEWIS INVESTMENT COMPANY, LLC, a California limited liability company By: LEWIS OPERATING CORP.,, a Galifornia corporation ;Its Sole Manager Name: Rob .Martin CA DRE Broker Lic. #00963777 lts: Authorized Agent _ Attachment Exhibit "A" - Option A Property Exhibit "B" - Option B Property 2 of ~ P93 ,., •. P94 - August 25, 2010 - Letter of Intent was delivered certified mail to purchase a portion of the Viramontez private dirt road required to complete the subdivision intersection improvements. - May 10, 2011-Called Lupe Viramontez to schedule a time to meet to discuss City's direction to construct ultimate intersection improvements and impacts to a portion of her property. Left a voicemail. - May 12, 2011- Lupe Viramontez returned voicemail and stated she needed to discuss selling a portion of her dirt access road with her family before she would like to meet. - May 17, 2011- Follow up phone call to Lupe Viramontez to get an update on her family discussion. Left a voicemail. - May 19, 2011- Follow up phone call to Lupe Viramontez to get an update on her family discussion and to schedule a meeting to discuss the proposed intersection improvements. Left a voicemail. - May 24, 2011- Follow up call to Lupe Viramontez. Left a voicemail. - May 26, 2011-Tom Boyle from Lewis Operating Corp and Michael Van Daele from Van Daele Homes visited Lupe Viramontez house to show her the conceptual plans and continue the dialogue. - May 27, 2011-Lupe Viramontez left a voicemail stated she was not interested in selling her property and she would respond to any City correspondence moving forward. 3 ~~ 3 P95 66462.6. Approval of final map .cannot be refused because of offsite improvement requirements on land not belonging to.subdivision or local agency (a) A city, county, or city and county shall not postpone or refuse approval'of a final map because the subdivider has failed to meet a tentative map condition which requires the subdivider to construct or install offsite improvements on land in which neither the subdivider nor the local agency has sufficient title or interest, including an easement or license, at the time the final map is filed with the local agency, to permit the improvements to be made. In such cases, unless the city, county, or city and county requires the subdivider to enter into an agreement pursuant to subdivision (c), the city, county or city and county shall, within 120 days of the filing of the final map, .pursuant to Section 66457, acquire by negotiation or commence proceedings pursuant to Title 7 (commencing with Section 130.0.10) of Part 3 of the Code of Civil Procedure to acquire an interest in the land which will permit the improvements to be -made, including proceedings for immediate possession of the property under Article 3 (commencing with Section 1255.410) of .Chapter 6 of that title. (b) If a city, county, or city and county has not required the subdivider to enter into an agreement pursuant to subdivision and if a city, county, or city and county fails to meet the 120-day time limitation, the condition for construction of offsite improvements shall be conclusively deemed. to be waived. The waiver shall occur whether. or not the city, county, or city and county has postponed or refused .approval of the final map pursuant to subdivision (a). (c) Prior to approval of the. final map the city; county, or city and~counry may require the subdivider to enter into an agreement to. complete the improvements pursuant to Section 66462` at such time as the city, county, or city and county acquires an interest in the land that will permit the improvements to be made. (d) Nothing in this section precludes a city, county, or city and county from requiring a subdivider to pay the cost of acquiring offsite real property interests required in connection with a subdivision. (e) "Offsite improvements," as used in this section, does not include improvements that are necessary to assure replacement or coned mtSectoon 5009 ~ofothe Health and families of low or moderate income, as deft . Safety Code. [Amended, Chapter 728, Statutes of 2003) Item: ~~ ~~~+ Title: 5'~~/I~A,~~~~/ /~~ ~~ ,g~gyR4:'S3NitAS P96 STAFF REPORT ~-'~~'; ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES DEPARTMENT RANCHO Date: July 6, 2011 C;UCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager --,. From: John R. Gillison, Assistant City Manag By: Ingrid Y. Bruce, GIS/Special Districts Manager Subject: AUTHORIZATION TO EXECUTE AN ENTERPRISE LICENSE AGREEMENT FOR GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS SOFTWARE BETWEEN ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEM RESEARCH INSTITUTE AND THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA IN THE TOTAL AMOUNT OF $207,000 FOR A THREE (3) YEAR TERM PAYABLE IN THREE (3) ANNUAL INSTALLMENTS AND AUTHORIZATION TO APPROPRIATE $74,000 INTO ACCOUNT NUMBER 1373701-5152 FOR THE FIRST YEAR'S PAYMENT. RECOMMENDATION Staff respectfully requests the City Council provide authorization to execute an Enterprise License Agreement (ELA) for Geographic Information Systems (GIS) between Environmental System Research Institute (ESRI) and the City of Rancho Cucamonga in the total amount of $207,000 for a three (3) year term payable in three (3) annual installments and authorization to appropriate $74,000 into account number 1373701-5152 for the first year's payment. BACKGROUND In 1985, the City approved the purchase of very specialized software for managing geographic data spatially. ESRI is the world leader in GIS software and the largest supplier to over 350,000 organizations worldwide similar to Microsoft and Windows. ESRI software is the standard in state and local government and is used by more than 24,000 state and local governments across the nations. Without this very specialized software, GIS applications and mapping would be virtually impossible. The early introduction of this software in the organization has propelled the City into being one of the recognized local government leaders in the field on GIS technology that has successfully implemented and currently maintains GIS as an enterprise solution. Some of the many existing uses of GIS in various City departments include: Fire ^ The Fire Department utilizes map books for emergency response on a daily basis. These maps are critical for any E-911 call. ^ The weed abatement program application which easily enables the fire inspector to perform efficiently in the field. P97 AUTHORIZATION TO EXECUTE AN ENTERPRISE LICENSE AGREEMENT FOR PAGE 2 GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS SOFTWARE BETWEEN ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEM RESEARCH INSTITUTE AND THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA JULY 6, 2011 Business License ^ Various mapping products which help the division in tracking businesses in the city and also locate residential businesses operating without permits. Since January, utilizing this application has enabled Business License to recover $45,000 in revenue with notifying a little less than half the number identified. Building & Safety/Code Enforcement ^ Mapping products that enhance daily work. Both divisions are currently using interactive applications which provide them with critical information regarding property, trails, violations, etc. Public Works ^ Street sweeping maps, trash pick up maps and sign inventory are among the number of GIS applications utilized by staff daily. Interactive application for catch basin and storm drain to capture the various locations of these features that enables staff to easily perform their work more efficiently in the field. Engineering ^ Interactive applications, map books and printing jobs are examples of GIS use. Currently beta testing an application that will notify residents and businesses of critical projects within the city. Community Services ^ Using our GIS software to create mailing labels that are essential to everyday functions. Other critical services are client distribution analysis, demographic analysis, ,and site suitability analysis to name a few. Each year the software maintenance must be renewed for a period of twelve (12) months. This year ESRI introduced the ELA which for a period of three (3) years will grant the City unlimited access to the ESRI products including maintenance on all software at an improved cost and level of service. Key features of ELA include the following: ^ A lower cost per unit for licensed software; ^ Substantially reduced administrative and procurement expenses; ^ One-stop Maintenance on all ESRI software deployed under the agreement; ^ Complete flexibility to deploy software products when and where needed in the organization; ^ Annual subscription to the ESRI Developer Network; ^ Free attendance at ESRI User Training Conferences; ^ Authorized Caller Support; ^ All departments, employees and contractors of the City are eligible. to use ESRI software and services. P98 AUTHORIZATION TO E~iECUTE AN ENTERPRISE LICENSE AGREEMENT FOR PAGE 3 GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS SOFTWARE BETWEEN ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEM RESEARCH INSTITUTE AND THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA JULY 6, 2011 The estimated cost of the ELA is $207,000 and the payment terms are as follows: 2011 $ 74,000 2012 $ 64,000 2013 $ 69,000 Total estimated cost ~~ As the benefit of using GIS has been realized, the demands for applications have increased thereby requiring more licenses than are currently being deployed. The ELA allows for expansion of the current license deployments to twenty-two (22) additional ArcGIS Desktop licenses, two (2) additional ArcGIS Desktop extensions and three (3) additional ArcGIS Server licenses. The cost of procuring the additional license deployments (outside an ELA) would be in excess of $200,000. Upon completion of the expansion, the annual maintenance would be $91,600. The ESRI ELA maintenance cost proposal is $207,000 over three (3) years, resulting in a three (3) year cost savings of $169,800 in addition to the procurement savings noted above. Funding for the first year will be from the Community Oriented Policing Services Joint Grant between the County of San. Bernardino Sheriff and the City of Rancho Cucamonga for GIS software to complete the Active Shooter applications for our high schools and middle schools. STAFF REPORT ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES DEPARTMENT Date: July 6, 2011 i RANCHO C,UCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager From: John R. Gillison, Assistant City Manage By: Keri Hinojos, CPPB, Senior Buye Subject: APPROVE AN ANNUAL, CITYWIDE AGREEMENT WITH INLAND STATIONERS, INC. TO PROVIDE PRINTER TONER CARTRIDGES AND MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES, UTILIZING U.S. COMMUNITIES MASTER AGREEMENT NUMBER MA-IS-1 140050, AND WITH OFFICE MAX TO PROVIDE COPY AND PRINTER PAPER, UTILIZING AMERICA SAVES CONTRACT NUMBER 003209; FUNDED BY VARIOUS CITYWIDE ACCOUNT NUMBERS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ADOPTED BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 2011/2012, AND AUTHORIZE CONTINUED UTILIZATION OF SAID CONTRACTS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THEIR SPECIFIED EXPIRATION DATES. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the City Council approve an annual citywide agreement with Inland Stationers, Inc. to provide printer toner cartridges and miscellaneous office supplies, utilizing U.S. Communities Master Agreement Number MA-IS-1 140050, and with Office Max to provide copy and printer paper, utilizing America Saves Contract Number 003209; funded by various citywide account numbers in accordance with the adopted budget for fiscal year 2011/2012, and authorize continued utilization of said contracts in accordance with their specified expiration dates. BACKGROUND In 2010, the U.S. Communities contract awarded to Office Depot for office supplies expired. This opened the opportunity for multiple office supply vendors to offer their awarded competitively bid cooperative contracts to be considered as a piggyback option. Purchasing requested and analyzed four (4) competitively bid cooperative office supply contracts in order to determine which contract would be in the City's best interest. Staff conducted a comparison of core items that the City purchases in large quantities and which account for the City's greatest expenditures (copy paper, printer toner cartridges) and small dollar items that are purchased most frequently. As a result of the analysis, staff found Inland Stationers, Inc. responded with the lowest cumulative pricing for toners cartridges and miscellaneous small dollar supplies. Office Max responded with the lowest cumulative price for copy paper. Purchasing reviewed each competitively bid cooperative contract and the procurement process that was followed to ensure that each contract is in accordance with the City's own procurement process. With respect to the Inland Stationers Inc. contract, the County of Los Angeles, California acted as the lead agency and opened a formal Request for Proposal (RFP) in June 2010 with the intent to award a new U.S. Communities contract. It was nationally advertised and the responses were evaluated by four (4) other government agencies. As a result of the RFP, a new U.S. P99 P100 CONTRACTS FOR OFFICE SUPPLIES JULY 6, 2011 PAGE 2 Communities contract (Master Agreement MA-IS-1 140050) was awarded to Inland Stationers, Inc. on August 31, 2010. The initial contract term is September 1, 2010 and effective through August 31, 2013. Inland Stationers, Inc. utilizes a network of small, local businesses to provide and deliver product to each customer. All orders are placed online and are delivered the next business day. With respect to the Office Max contract, the County of Oakland, Michigan acted as the lead agency and issued an RFP in February 2011. The RFP was evaluated by the County along with additional members of the Michigan Trade Network Group. As a result, OfficeMax was awarded the contract for office supplies. As part of the cooperative agreement the County of Oakland is extending its office supply contract with OfficeMax to all governmental agencies that wish to participate. The contract expiration date is May 31, 2014. Therefore, staff recommends that City Council authorize purchasing office supplies from both Inland Stationers, Inc. and Office Max for the respective supplies as identified in the analysis. Staff also recommends continuing to extend the utilization of each contract in accordance with the expiration dates as specified and authorize expenditures in accordance with the adopted fiscal year budgets from various citywide accounts. Purchasing will continue to review the contracts annually. All contract documentation is on file in Purchasing. STAFF REPORT ADAIIISIST'R~TI~')/ SERVICES DEP.~RTA~II/NT Date: July 6, 2011 To: Mayor and Members of City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager From: John R. Gillison, Assistant City Manag By: Keri Hinojos, CPPB, Senior Buyer LtV RANCHO G'UCAA40NGA Subject: APPROVE AN ANNUAL, CITYWIDE AGREEMENT WITH INDEPENDENT STATIONERS TO PROVIDE PRINTER TONER CARTRIDGES AND MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES, UTILIZING U.S. COMMUNITIES MASTER AGREEMENT NUMBER MA-IS-1 140050, AND WITH OFFICE MAX TO PROVIDE COPY AND PRINTER PAPER, UTILIZING AMERICA SAVES CONTRACT NUMBER 003209; FUNDED BY VARIOUS CITYWIDE ACCOUNT NUMBERS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ADOPTED BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 2011/2012, AND AUTHORIZE CONTINUED UTILIZATION OF SAID CONTRACTS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THEIR SPECIFIED EXPIRATION DATES. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the City Council approve an annual citywide agreement with Independent Stationers to provide printer toner cartridges and miscellaneous office supplies, utilizing U.S. Communities Master Agreement Number MA-IS-1 140050, and with Office Max to provide copy and printer paper, utilizing America Saves Contract Number 003209; funded by various citywide account numbers in accordance with the adopted budget for fiscal year 2011/2012, and authorize continued utilization of said contracts in accordance with their specified expiration dates. BACKGROUND In 2010, the U.S. Communities contract awarded to Office Depot for office supplies expired. This opened the opportunity for multiple office supply vendors to offer their awarded competitively bid cooperative contracts to be considered as a piggyback option. Purchasing requested and analyzed four (4) competitively bid cooperative office supply contracts in order to determine which contract would be in the City's best interest. Staff conducted a comparison of core items that the City purchases in large quantities and which account for the City's greatest expenditures (copy paper, printer toner cartridges) and small dollar items that are purchased most frequently. As a result of the analysis, staff found Independent Stationers responded with the lowest cumulative pricing for toners cartridges and miscellaneous small dollar supplies. Office Max responded with the lowest cumulative price for copy paper. Purchasing reviewed each competitively bid cooperative contract and the procurement process that was followed to ensure that each contract is in accordance with the City's own procurement process. With respect to the Independent Stationers contract, the County of Los Angeles, California acted as the lead agency and opened a formal Request for Proposal (RFP) in June 2010 with the intent to award a new U.S. Communities contract. It was nationally advertised and the responses were evaluated by four (4) other government agencies. As a result of the RFP, a new CC)N7R,~(1'S I~OR Ol~l~l(:I: Slll'PI,II?S J u,.,~ 6, 2011 I'~(,I~ ~ U.S. Communities contract (Master Agreement MA-IS-1 140050) was awarded to Independent Stationers on August 31, 2010. The initial contract term is September 1, 2010 and effective through August 31, 2013. Independent Stationers utilizes a network of small, local businesses to provide and deliver product to each customer. All orders are placed online and are delivered the next business day. With respect to the Office Max contract, the County of Oakland, Michigan acted as the lead agency and issued an RFP in February 2011. The RFP was evaluated by the County along with additional members of the Michigan Trade Network Group. As a result, OfficeMax was awarded the contract for office supplies. As part of the cooperative agreement the County of Oakland is extending its office supply contract with OfficeMax to all governmental agencies that wish to participate. The contract expiration date is May 31, 2014. Therefore, staff recommends that City Council authorize purchasing office supplies from both Independent Stationers and Office Max for the respective supplies as identified in the analysis. Staff also recommends continuing to extend the utilization of each contract in accordance with the expiration dates as specified and authorize expenditures in accordance with the adopted fiscal year budgets from various citywide accounts. Purchasing will continue to review the contracts annually. All contract documentation is on file in Purchasing. Item: L11. RDA -FIRE -CITY COUNCIL July 6, 2011 Approval of Resolutions initiating proceedings to levy annual assessments, preliminarily approve the annual levy reports, declaring the City Council's intention fo levy annual assessments within Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 for Fiscal Year 2011/12 and setting the Time and place for a public hearing thereon. NO INCREASE OF ASSESSMENT RATE FOR FY 2011/12 IS PROPOSED. (Resolution No. 11-095, Resolution No. 71-096 and Resolution No. 71-097J Revised Annual Engineer's Reports Fiscal Year 2011/2012 The Engineer's Reports were reviewed under separate cover and were not intended to be included in the City Council and Staff Agenda packet distribution. The reports are now included in the Laserfiche Agenda packet archive for reference. STAFF REPORT ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES DEPARTMENT P101 RANCHO Date: July 6, 2011 C;UCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager From: John R. Gillison, Assistant City Manager By: Ingrid Y. Bruce, GIS/Special Districts Manager Subject: CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF RESOLUTIONS INITIATING PROCEEDINGS TO LEVY ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS, PRELIMINARILY APPROVE THE ANNUAL LEVY REPORTS, DECLARING THE CITY COUNCIL'S INTENTION TO LEVY ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS WITHIN STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO'S 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 AND 8 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2011/12 AND SETTING THE TIME AND PLACE FOR A PUBLIC HEARING THEREON. NO INCREASE OF ASSESSMENT RATE FOR FY 2011/12 IS PROPOSED. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council approve the Resolutions initiating the proceedings to levy annual assessments, preliminarily approve the annual levy reports, declaring the City Council's intention to levy annual assessments within Street Lighting Maintenance District No's. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8. There is no increase to the current rates in these districts for Fiscal Year 2011/2012. The Engineer's Reports are on file in the City Clerk's Office. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The City of Rancho Cucamonga has eight (8) Street Lighting Maintenance Districts that provide street light coverage throughout the general city and planned communities. Each year the assessments received are earmarked for the maintenance and operation of street lights, traffic signals and appurtenant facilities related thereto. Said maintenance and operation includes the cost and supervision of street lighting maintenance (including repair removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement providing for illumination of the subject area) in connection with said Districts. The City utilizes prior year carryovers along with current year revenues to meet the districts annual expenses. The City has determined, as stated in the Street Lighting Maintenance Districts Fiscal Year 2011/2012 Engineer's Reports that the assessment rates shall remain unchanged from the previous FY 2010/2011 rates. The assessment rate and district description for each Street Lighting Maintenance District is as follows: Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 assessments pay for energy and maintenance for streetlights on arterial streets. The current assessment rate is $17.77 per single-family residence. The commercial rate is $35.54m per acre. P102 CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF RESOLUTIONS DECLA.RING THE CIT'I' COUNCIL'S PAG~~. 2 INTENTION TO LEVY ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS WITHIN STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO'S 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 AND 8 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2011/12 AND SETTING THE TIME AND PLACE FOR A PUBLIC HEARING THEREON. JULY 6, 2011 Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 assessments pay for energy and maintenance for streetlights on residential streets. The current assessment rate is $39.97 per single-family residence. The commercial rate is $79.94 per acre. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3 assessments pay for energy and maintenance for streetlights within the Victoria Planned Community. The current assessment rate is $47.15 per single-family residence. The commercial -rate is $94.30 per acre. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 4 assessments pay for energy and maintenance for streetlights within the Terra Vista Planned Community. The current assessment rate is $28.96 per single-family residence, the multi-family rate is $14.48 per dwelling unit and the commercial rate is $57.92 per acre. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 5 assessments pay for energy and maintenance for streetlights within the Caryn Planned Community. The current assessment rate is $34.60 per single-family residence. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 assessments pay for energy and maintenance for streetlights within the commercial and industrial area of the City. The current assessment rate is $51.40 per acre for commercial property. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 7 assessments pay for energy and maintenance for streetlights within the Etiwanda Highlands Community. The current assessment rate is $33.32 per single-family residence. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 8 assessments pay for energy and maintenance for streetlights in South Etiwanda. The current assessment rate is $60.00 per single-family residence. Attachments Resolutions Engineer's Reports P103 RESOLUTION NO. ~CG~.~ RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO PROVIDE FOR THE ANNUAL LEVY AND COLLECTION OF ASSESSMENTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2011/2012 IN STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO'S. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 AND 8, INCLUSIVE, AND SETTING A TIME AND PLACE FOR A PUBLIC HEARING THEREON WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has previously formed certain maintenance districts and authorized the levy of assessments therein pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972," being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California (commencing with Section 22500) (the "1972 Act") in what are known and designated as Street Lighting Maintenance District No's. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8, inclusive -(each a "District" and collectively, the "Districts"); and WHEREAS, this City Council has initiated proceedings to provide for the annual levy of assessments for Fiscal Year 2011/12, to finance the costs and expenses necessary for continued maintenance and servicing of improvements within each District; and WHEREAS, at this time; there has been presented and approved by this City Council, a separate report for each District identified by the distinctive designation of such District and entitled "Fiscal Year 2011/12 Annual Levy Report" (each, an "Annual Levy Report" and collectively, the "Annual Levy Reports") as required pursuant to Article 4 of Chapter 1 of the 1972 Act, Article XIIID of the Constitution of the State of California ("Article XIIID") and the Proposition 218 Omnibus Implementation Act (Government Code Section 53750 and following) (the "Implementation Act") (the 1972 Act, Article XIIID and the Implementation Act are referred to collectively as. the "Assessment Law"), and this City Council desires to conduct the proceedings to authorize the levy of the annual assessments within each District; and WHEREAS, the annual assessments for Fiscal Year 2011/12 proposed to be levied within each District as set forth in the applicable Annual Levy Report do not exceed the annual assessments as previously authorized to be levied within such District and, therefore, the proposed levy of assessments for Fiscal Year 2011/2012 within such District are not deemed to be "increased" over the maximum authorized annual assessments. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, DETERMINED AND ORDERED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, as follows: SECTION 1. Recitals. The above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2. Improvements And Maintenance and Servicing Thereof. The public interest and convenience requires, and it is the intention of this City Council, to undertake proceedings for the annual levy .and collection of assessments within each District for the continual maintenance and servicing of the improvements authorized to be maintained and serviced within each such District. P104 The improvements include, but are not limited to, street lights, traffic signals and appurtenant facilities related thereto. A description of the specific improvements to. be maintained and serviced within each District is set forth in Appendix A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. The maintenance of the improvements includes the furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operation, and servicing of any improvement. Service includes -the furnishing of electric currerit or energy, gas, or other illuminating agent for any improvement. Reference is made to the applicable Annual Levy Report for further information regarding the improvements to be maintained and serviced for each District and the scope of such maintenance and service. SECTION 3. Annual Levy Reports. The Annual Levy Reports regarding the annual levy for each District for Fiscal Year 2011/2012 have been previously approved and directed to be filed in the Office the City Clerk. Reference is made to the applicable such report for each District for a full and detailed description of the improvements to be maintained and serviced, the boundaries of such District and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within such District. SECTION 4. Assessment. The public interest and convenience requires, and it is the intention of this City Council to order the annual levy of assessments for each District as set forth and described in the applicable Annual Levy Report, and further it is determined to be in the best public interest and convenience to levy and collect annual assessments to pay the costs and expenses of such maintenance and service as estimated in such Annual Levy Report. SECTION 5. Boundaries Of Districts. The proposed maintenance and service work as described in the Annual Levy Report for each District is, in the opinion of this City Council, of special benefit to the properties within the boundaries of such District, and this City Council makes the costs and expenses of such maintenance and service chargeable upon each such District, which District said City Council hereby declares to be the District specially benefited by such maintenance and service, and to be further assessed pursuant to the Assessment Law to pay the costs and expenses thereof. Each such District shall include each and every parcel of land within the boundaries thereof; as such District is shown on a map or maps as approved by this City Council and on file in the Office of the City Clerk, and so designated by the name of such District. SECTION 6. Public Hearing. Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held the 3rd day of August, 2011, at the hour of 7:00 o'clock p.m. or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard, in the regular meeting of the City Council, being in the Council Chambers located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California, which is the time and place fixed by this City Council for the hearing of protests or objections in reference to the annual levy of assessments, to the extent of the maintenance, by any interested person and any other matters contained in this resolution. Any persons who wish to object to the proceedings for the annual levy should file a written protest with the City Clerk prior to the time set and scheduled for said public hearing. P105 SECTION 7. For Information Regarding Proceedings. For any and all information relating. to the proceedings, protest procedure, any documentation and/or information of a procedural or technical nature, your attention is directed to the below listed person at the City: Ingrid Bruce GIS/Special Districts Manager City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 (909) 477-2700, Ext 2575 SECTION 8. Notice. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to publish, pursuant to Government Code Section 6061, a copy of this Resolution in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin, a newspaper of general circulation within said City, said publication shall be made one time and not less than ten (10) days before the date set for the Public Hearing. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this day of July, 2011 AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: ATTEST: L. Dennis Michael, Mayor Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk I, Janice C. Reynolds, .City Clerk of the certify that the foregoing Resolution was Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga 2011. Executed this City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby duly passed, approved and adopted by the City at a regular meeting of said City Council held on ., at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk P106 APPENDIX A DESCRIPTION OF IMPROVEMENTS This Appendix A contains general descriptions of the improvements to be maintained and serviced within each of the Districts. Please refer to the Annual Levy Reports for a full and complete description of the maintenance and service to be provided for each District. Street Liqhtinq Maintenance District No. 1 The installation/maintenance of street lights and traffic signals on arterial streets that are throughout the City. Street Liqhtinq Maintenance District No. 2 The installation/maintenance of street lights and traffic signals on local streets that are generally west of Haven Avenue. Street Liqhtinq Maintenance District No. 3 The installation/maintenance of street lights and traffic signals located within the Victoria Planned Community. Street Liqhtinq Maintenance District No. 4 The installation/maintenance of street lights and traffic signals located within the Terra Vista Planned Community. Street Liqhtinq Maintenance District No. 5 The installation/maintenance of street lights Planned Community. and traffic signals located within the Caryn Street Liqhtinq Maintenance District No. 6 The installation/maintenance of street lights and traffic signals located on commercial and industrial streets throughout the City but that are not within an existing local maintenance district. This area is located generally south of Foothill Boulevard. Street Liqhtinq Maintenance District No. 7 The installation/maintenance of street lights and traffic signals on local streets within this area of the City is known as "North Etiwanda". This area is located generally east of Day Creek Channel and north of Highland Avenue. Street Liqhtinq Maintenance District No. 8 The installation/maintenance of street lights and traffic signals on local streets within this area of the City is known as "South Etiwanda". This area is located generally east of Etiwanda Avenue, north of Foothill Boulevard and south of Highland Avenue. P107 RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE PREPARATION OF ANNUAL LEVY REPORTS PURSUANT;TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE ASSESSMENT LAW FOR PROCEEDINGS FOR THE ANNUAL ASSESSMENT LEVY WITHIN STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO'S. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 AND 8, INCLUSIVE, FOR FISCAL YEAR 2011/12 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, previously undertaken proceedings to form and has formed certain maintenance districts pursuant to pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California (commencing with Section 22500) (the "1972 Act"), known and designated as Street Lighting Maintenance District No's. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8, inclusive (each, a "District" and collectively, the "Districts"); and WHEREAS, at this time the City Council desires to initiate proceedings pursuant to Chapter 3 of the 1972 Act to provide for the annual levy of assessments for the next ensuing fiscal year to provide for the annual costs for maintenance and servicing of improvements within the Districts; and WHEREAS, the proceedings for the annual levy of assessments shall relate to the fiscal year commencing July 1, 2011, and ending June 30, 2012 ("Fiscal Year 2011 /12"). NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, DETERMINED AND ORDERED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, as follows: SECTION 1. Recitals. The above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2. New Improvements or Substantial Changes in Existing Improvements. No new improvements are proposed to be added to the improvements to be maintained and serviced and no substantial changes in the existing improvements are proposed to 6e made for Fiscal Year 2011/12. SECTION 3. Annual Levy Reports. The City Engineer is hereby ordered to prepare and file with this City Council an Annual Levy Report for each District relating to such annual assessment and levy in such District in accordance with the provisions of Article 3 of Chapter 1 of the 1972 Act, Article XIIID of the Constitution of the State of California ("Article XIIID") and the Proposition 218 Omnibus Implementation Act (Government Code Section 53750 and following) (the "Implementation Act") (the 1972 Act, Article XIIID and the Implementation Act are referred to collectively as the "Assessment Law"). SECTION 4. Filing of the Annual Levy Reports. Upon completion, the Annual Levy Report for each District shall be filed with the City Clerk, who shall then submit the same to this City Council for its consideration pursuant to the Assessment Law. P108 PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this day of July, 2011. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: L. Dennis Michael, Mayor ATTEST: Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk I, Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of said City Council held on .2011. Executed this , at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk P109 RESOLUTION NO. ~ ~9 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, PRELIMINARILY APPROVING THE ANNUAL LEVY REPORTS FOR THE ANNUAL LEVY OF ASSESSMENTS WITHIN STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO'S. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 AND 8, INCLUSIVE, FOR FISCAL YEAR 2011/12 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, pursuant to the provisions of Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California (the "1972 Act"), Article XIIID of the Constitution of the State of California ("Article XIIID") and the Proposition 218 Omnibus Implementation Act (Government Code Section 53750 and following) (the "Implementation Act") (the 1972 Act, Article XIIID and the Implementation Act are referred to collectively as the "Assessment Law"), did, by previous Resolution, order the preparation of a separate report for the annual levy of assessments for Fiscal Year 2011/2012 (each, an "Annual Levy Report") in certain maintenance assessment districts known and designated as Street Lighting Maintenance District No's. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8, inclusive (each, a "District" and collectively, the "Districts"); and WHEREAS, there has now been presented to this City Council a separate Annual Levy Report for each District as required by the Assessment Law and as previously directed by Resolution; and WHEREAS, this City Council has now examined and reviewed each Annual Levy Report as presented, and is satisfied with each and all of the items and documents as set forth in each report, and is satisfied that the assessments on a preliminary basis, have been spread within each District in accordance with the special benefits received from the improvements to be maintained and serviced, as set forth in the applicable Annual Levy Report. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, DETERMINED AND ORDERED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, as follows: SECTION 1. Recitals. The above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2. Annual Levy Reports. The Annual Levy Report for each District as presented, consisting of the following: A. Plans and specifications describing the general nature, location and extent of the improvements to be maintained and serviced and the extent of such maintenance; B. An estimate of the cost of the maintenance of the improvements for the District for Fiscal Year 2011 /12; C. A diagram for such District, showing the area and properties proposed to be assessed; and P110 D. An annual assessment for Fiscal Year 2011/2012 of the estimated costs of the maintenance and servicing of those improvements to be maintained and serviced during such Fiscal Year, assessing the net amount upon all assessable lots and/or parcels within such District in proportion to the special benefits received is hereby approved on a preliminary basis and is ordered to be filed in the Office of the City Clerk • as a permanent record and to remain open to public inspection. SECTION 3. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Resolution, and the minutes of this meeting shall so reflect the presentation of the Annual Levy Reports. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this day of July, 2011. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: L. Dennis Michael, Mayor ATTEST: Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk I, Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of said City Council held on 2011. Executed this , at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk Item: L11. RDA -FIRE -CITY COUNCIL July 6, 2011 Approval of Resolutions initiating proceedings to levy annual assessments, preliminarily approve fhe annual levy reports, declaring the City Council's intention to levy annual assessments within Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 for Fiscal Year 2099/12 and setting the time and place for a public hearing thereon. NO INCREASE OF ASSESSMENT RATE FOR FY 2011/12 1S PROPOSED. [Resolution No. 11-095, Resolution No. 11-096 and Resolution No. 11-097J Revised Annual Engineer's Reports Fiscal Year 2011 /2012 The Engineer's Reports were reviewed under separate cover and were not intended to be included in the City Council and Staff Agenda packet distribution. The reports are now included in the Laserfiche Agenda packet archive for reference. Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2011/2012 City of Rancho Cucamonga Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 (Arterial Streets) ENGINEER'S REPORT AFFIDAVIT Rancho Cucamonga Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 (Arterial Streets) City of Rancho Cucamonga San Bernardino County, State of California This Report describes the District and all relevant areas therein including the improvements, budgets, parcels and assessments to be levied for fiscal year 2011/2012, as they existed at the time of the passage of the Resolution of Intention. Reference is hereby made to the San Bernardino County assessor's maps for a detailed description of the lines and dimensions of parcels within the District. The undersigned respectively submits the enclosed Report as directed by the City Council. Dated this 6~" day of July, 2011 Approved by: -~' 7~Y-~/I~ Mark Steuer, City Engineer 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS OVERVIEW .........................................................................................4 SECTION 1 -DESCRIPTION OF FACILITIES ............................................5 SECTION 2 -ESTIMATE OF COSTS AND EXPENSES ..............................6 SECTION 3 -METHOD OF ASSESSMENT APPORTIONMENT ...................7 A. GENERAL ......................................................................7 B. ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY .......................................7 C. ASSESSMENT ................................................................8 SECTION 4 -ANNEXATIONS ................................................................9 SECTION 5 -ASSESSMENT DIAGRAMS ..............................................11 3 Overview The FY 2011/2012 Annual Report for Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 (Arterial streets) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Part 2, Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Street Lighting and Light Act of 1972). Section 1 Description of Facilities The plans and specifications for improvements maintained by the Assessment District consist of a general description of the nature, location, and the extent of the improvements proposed to be maintained, and are attached hereto. Section 2 Estimates of Cost and Expenses An estimate of the maintenance cost of the improvements, including incidental costs and expenses in connection therewith for FY 2011/2012, is set forth on the lists thereof, attached hereto. Section 3 Method of Assessment Apportionment Discuses the methodology used for calculating assessments in the District. The method reflects the composition of the parcels, and the improvements and services provided, to fairly apportion the costs based on benefit to each parcel. The assessment roll states the net amount to be assessed upon all assessable lands within the District for FY 2011/2012, and describes each assessable lot or parcel of land within the District. These lots and parcels are more particularly described on the County assessment Roll, which is on file in the office of the San Bernardino County Assessor and by reference is made a part of this Engineer's Report Section 4 Annexations List the developments, which have annexed to the Street Lighting Maintenance District within Calendar year 2010. Section 5 Assessment Diagrams Shows the boundaries of the areas to be annexed to the Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 and the general boundaries of the District. For details regarding the boundaries and dimensions of the respective parcels and subdivisions of land within the Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1, refer to the San Bernardino County Assessor's maps. 4 Section 1 -Description of Facilities: Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (SLD #1)) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located on arterial streets throughout the City. The facilities within this district, being located on arterial streets, have been determined to benefit the City as a whole on an equal basis and as such those costs associated with the maintenance and/or installation of the facilities is assigned to the citywide district. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on arterial streets and traffic signals on arterial streets within the rights-of-way or designated easements of streets dedicated to the City. Typically, street lights are installed by private development as a condition of a development project's approval. Traffic signals can be installed by development or as a City capital improvement project. Historically, the installation of street lights and traffic signals has not been funded with Street Light District funds, however, this is permitted under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972. Any new street lights in areas to be maintained by the District will become part of the active work program at such time as these new areas are annexed into the District. The normal process will be the dedication of the areas to the City, at which time a sufficient non-refundable deposit will be made by the developer to the City. This deposit will provide for costs of energizing and six months of ordinary and usual maintenance, operation and servicing of the street lights in each development at the time of initial operation of the lighting system. The costs will be based on the number and type of street lights and based on Southern California Edison Company's rate for street lights. Immediately upon the energizing of the street lights, those street lights will become a part of the work program of the district. 5 Section 2 -Estimate of Costs and Expenses: The majority of the budgeted operating costs for SLD #1 are for electric utility charges for the streetlights and traffic signals within the district. The projected costs to operate and maintain SLD #1 are as follows: District Budget Estimated 2077/12 Budget Personnel Services Regular Salaries $22,080.00 Part-time Salaries 12,700.00 Fringe Benefits 11.780.00 Subtotal Personnel $46,560.00 Operations and Maintenance Operations and Maintenance $9,150.00 Equipment Operations and Maintenance 500.00 Contract Services 0.00 Utilities Telephone Utilities 1,180.00 Electric Utilities 804,800.00 Assessment Administration 158,200.00 General Overhead 53,660.00 Interfund Allocation 16.290.00 Subtotal Operations and Maintenance $1,043,780.00 Capital Expenditures Capital Projects 0.00 Subtotal Capital Expenditures 0.00 Total District Expenditure Budget ~ $1,090,340.00 Total Estimated Assessment $774,130.00 Less Anticipated Delinquencies (39.870.00) Total Estimated Revenue $734,260.00 Plus Operating Reserve Fund Contribution 356.080.00 Total Expenditure Budget $7,090,340.00 Total Estimated Assessment $774,130.00 Total District EBU Count .00 Actual Assessment per EBU -Fiscal Year 2011/12 $17.77 Maximum Allowable Assessment er GBU-fiscal Year 2011/12 $17.77 6 Section 3 -Method of Assessment Apportionment: A. General The 1972 Act permits the establishments of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include construction, maintenance and servicing of public lights, landscaping and appurtenant facilities. The 1972 Act further requires that the cost of these improvements be levied according to benefit rather than assessed value: "The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements. " The formula used for calculating assessments in the District therefore reflects the composition of the parcels, and the improvements and services provided, to fairly apportion the costs based on benefit to each parcel. B. Assessment Methodology Equivalent Dwelling Units: To assess benefits equitably, it is necessary to relate the different types of parcel improvements to each other. The Equivalent Dwelling Unit method of apportionment uses the single-family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single family home equals one The Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU). Every other land-use is converted to EDU's based on an assessment formula that equates the property's specific development status, type of development (land-use), and size of the property, as compared to asingle-family home (SFR). The EDU method of apportioning benefit is typically seen as the most appropriate and equitable assessment methodology for calculating benefit in districts formed under the 1972 Act, as the benefit to each parcel from improvements are apportioned as a function of land-use type, size and development. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land-use types to determine each parcel's EDU. 7 LAND-USE/EQUIVALENT DWELLING UNITS EDU Value Multi Commercial 2.00 Vacant 2.00 Multi-Family 1.00 Single Family Residential 1.00 Acres Parcel Parcel The following table summarizes the assessment rate for the district: Land Use Tvpe Single Family Multi-Family Commercial/Industrial Assessment Rate $17.77/SFD $17.77/DU $35.54/Acre C. Assessment All assessed lots or parcels within the District are listed on the assessment role, which is on file in the office of the City Clerk and the City Engineer, and hereby made a part of this Engineer's Report, by reference. The assessment roll states the net amount to be assessed upon all assessable lands within the District for Fiscal Year 2011/2012 and describes each assessable lot or parcel of land within the District. These lots and parcels are more particularly described on the County assessment Roll, which is on file in the office of the San Bernardino County Assessor and by reference is made a part of this Engineer's Report. 8 Section 4 -Annexations: Calendar Year 2010 Annexations Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 PROJECT UNITS ANNEX DATE NO ANNEXATIONS Section 5 -Assessment Diagrams: io ~ ~ ~1.+ ~ u~ V ~ L v, *-' Y.~ ~ V~ J 1 O a Q .o J ~ o = U u7 0 Ad I~Jay~ ~ t~ ~' ti r v ~ J ' o ~ ~ N C _ _' y m ~ O ~ m :c o 3 0 , v_ a` ny ~se3 ~ ® ~•+ v ~ ny epuenn!;3 *.+ ny Ja;sayooa ny Ja~sayoo~ ny ua~!II!W ny ua~l!II!W ny uaneH ny uaneH ny esowJaH ny esouaJaH nd Ple4!4oJb' nb' Ple4!yoJb' ny uewpaH ~ ny ueuallaH ~ r L ,a ny pJ~/~au!n ;g uegawe~ ~~~~ss~~~~~~s~ ~ as ~~~ F~~LFi .~ ~, ~, ~ 00 ~' ~., ny anaJJ (/J ;Sy.~ ~t sa ~~ a~a s C ~ ~ = L 3 O w 00 ~ ;e ~~€~r~~o~€ s_._~ ~ Ti_°° ;e~ S&6 ~ ~ (n C ~ m O L~ Q f~=£e:~~aP~~ `B~~EriB ,ash g = ~ 9 ~ ~ '~ (A j~ C f0 _ $ i~ ~~~ c~a~pSS~~ ~~y ~:~gA~ =~€ ~8 = m ~ $~O of Fu1~€?~ y 2! 7< :"~AEoF:Pnaa 0~~~$6a¢a~~B 8e°=~~ ~ ~` ~ Soa2 Er~B°a ~$~€t~$ U _ ~~~:~:~8a~fie Z Iv, ~~ w, 0 ~ Z ~ d epuemp3 ^' }+ O V L • ~ Q N ~ Maai~ Aep 0 .^ N V ~ C ~ .~ ~ V __ • C~ ~ G ~~ = C ~ ~ ~ ~ ny uaneH _ J ~ y esouuaH ~ ~ J A W ~ ~ ~ y L d PIeQl4oh/ l$ uegawe~ -~ 0 Q C ~ O N N s`%_~ ~ Q Z ~° ~ nvdar J > O N l9 N33ii~ lit Q ny Aalsayuo ~ z a _~ ~ ,~ a } o nt+ r 7 c ~ r y c v m x C J N l0 m nv a31s3"~ CO O IW i. ~ 7 O ~ m ~~ ~ /~ •` ~~ W OO ~_ W ~ U ~ :~ C cn cn U ~ ~ J N sl-I ny sayooa ~ ua~il~iW O uaneH Q r i rvo~n J ~ I ~ ~ H W Q Z ~ ~ nb'OlH81H~2~b' 1e41y"b w ~ ~ ~ = cn Q U = .m nv NtfWll3H ti uewllaH L ~ ~ O V p~e~(awn H- F ~ V) F- O ~ ~ ~ ao c y anal _= _ ~ ~ s q e ~ g ` ~` o LL ~ 6 4~ g~ g~~ v 'p -. n `=_c ~7 5~9 x~ pp ~~°° ~ ~~~~~Yg9~~ x~~~g~e S~ ~ ~~ F'~~~ ~ ~S. q~a~~~~ ~~~~~=g° E'` ~SE-Lr~- -cE~ r 't Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2011/2012 City of Rancho Cucamonga Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 (Local streets) ENGINEER'S REPORT AFFIDAVIT Rancho Cucamonga Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 (Local Streets) City of Rancho Cucamonga San Bernardino County, State of California This Report describes the District and all relevant zones therein including the improvements, budgets, parcels and assessments to be levied for fiscal year 2011/2012, as they existed at the time of the passage of the Resolution of Intention. Reference is hereby made to the San Bernardino County assessor's maps for a detailed description of the lines and dimensions of parcels within the District. The undersigned respectively submits the enclosed Report as directed by the City Council. Dated this 6~h day of Jul , 2011. Approved by: Mark Steuer, City Engineer 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS OVERVIEW .........................................................................................4 SECTION 1 -DESCRIPTION OF FACILITIES ............................................5 SECTION 2 -ESTIMATE OF COSTS AND EXPENSES ..............................6 SECTION 3 -METHOD OF ASSESSMENT APPORTIONMENT ...................7 A. GENERAL ......................................................................7 B. ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY .......................................7 C. ASSESSMENT ................................................................8 SECTION 4 -ANNEXATIONS ................................................................9 SECTION 5 -ASSESSMENT DIAGRAMS ..............................................10 3 Overview The FY 2008/2009 Annual Report for Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 (Local streets) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Part 2, Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Street Lighting and Light Act of 1972). Section 1 Description of Facilities The plans and specifications for improvements maintained by the Assessment District consist of a general description of the nature, location, and the extent of the improvements proposed to be maintained, and are attached hereto. Section 2 Estimates of Cost and Expenses An estimate of the maintenance cost of the improvements, including incidental costs and expenses in connection therewith for FY 2011/2012, is set forth on the lists thereof, attached hereto. Section 3 Method of Assessment Apportionment Discuses the methodology used for calculating assessments in the District. The method reflects the composition of the parcels, and the improvements and services provided, to fairly apportion the costs based on benefit to each parcel. The assessment roll states the net amount to be assessed upon all assessable lands within the District for FY 2011!2012, and describes each assessable lot or parcel of land within the District. These lots and parcels are more particularly described on the County assessment Roll, which is on file in the office of the San Bernardino County Assessor and by reference is made a part of this Engineer's Report Section 4 Annexations List the developments, which have annexed to the Street Lighting Maintenance District within Calendar year 2010. Section 5 Assessment Diagrams Shows the boundaries of the areas to be annexed to the Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 and the general boundaries of the District. For details regarding the boundaries and dimensions of the respective parcels and subdivisions of land within the Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2, refer to the San Bernardino County Assessor's maps. 4 Section 1 -Description of Facilities: Street Light Maintenance District No. 2 (SLD #2) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located on local streets throughout the City but excluding those areas already in a local maintenance district. Generally, this area encompasses the residential area of the City west of Haven Avenue. It has been determined that the facilities in this district benefit this area of the City. This sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on local streets and traffic signals (or a portion thereof) on local streets generally west of Haven Avenue. Typically, street lights are installed by private development as a condition of a development project's approval. Traffic signals can be installed by development or as a City capital improvement project. Historically, the installation of street lights and traffic signals has not been funded with Street Light District funds, however, this is permitted under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972. Any new street lights in areas to be maintained by the District will become part of the active work program at such time as these new areas are annexed into the District. The normal process will be the dedication of the areas to the City, at which time a sufficient non-refundable deposit will be made by the developer to the City. This deposit will provide for costs of energizing and six months of ordinary and usual maintenance, operation and servicing of the street lights in each development at the time of initial operation of the lighting system. The costs will be based on the number and type of street lights and based on Southern California Edison Company's rate for street lights. Immediately upon energization of the street lights, those street lights will become a part of the work program of the district. 5 Section 2 -Estimate of Costs and Expenses: The majority of the budgeted operating costs for SLD #2 are for electric utility charges for the street lights and traffic signals within the district. The projected costs to operate and maintain SLD #2 are as follows: District Budget Estimated 2011/12 Budget Personnel Services Regular Salaries Part-time Salaries Fringe Benefits Subtotal Personnel Operations and Maintenance Operations and Maintenance Equipment Operations and Maintenance Contract Services Utilities Telephone Utilities Electric Utilities Assessment Administration General Overhead Interfund Allocation Subtotal Operations and Maintenance Capital Expenditures Caoital Projects Subtotal Capital Expenditures Total District Expenditure Budget Total Estimated Assessment Less Anticipated Delinquencies Total Estimated Revenue Plus Operating Reserve Fund Contribution Total Expenditure Budget Total Estimated Assessment Total District EBU Count Actual Assessment per EBU -Fiscal Year 2011/12 11/12 $0.00 0.00 0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 268,670.00 38,440.00 24,870.00 0.00 $331,980.00 0.00 0.00 $1,090,340.00 $364,430.00 (32.430.001 $332,000.00 0.00 $331,980.00 $364,430.00 00 $39.97 6 Section 3 -Method of Assessment Apportionment: A. General The 1972 Act permits the establishments of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include construction, maintenance and servicing of public lights, landscaping and appurtenant facilities. The 1972 Act further requires that the cost of these improvements be levied according to benefit rather than assessed value: "The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements. " The formula used for calculating assessments in the District therefore reflects the composition of the parcels, and the improvements and services provided, to fairly apportion the costs based on benefit to each parcel. B. Assessment Methodology Equivalent Dwelling Units: To assess benefits equitably, it is necessary to relate the different types of parcel improvements to each other. The Equivalent Dwelling Unit method of apportionment uses the single-family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single family home equals one The Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU). Every other land-use is converted to EDU's based on an assessment formula that equates the property's specific development status, type of development (land-use), and size of the property, as compared to asingle-family home (SFR). The EDU method of apportioning benefit is typically seen as the most appropriate and equitable assessment methodology for calculating benefit in districts formed under the 1972 Act, as the benefit to each parcel from improvements are apportioned as a function of land-use type, size and development. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land-use types to determine each parcel's EDU. LAND-USE/EQUIVALENT DWELLING UNITS EDU Value er Vacant 2.00 Multi-Family 1.00 Single Family Residential 1.00 Acres Acres Unit Unit 7 The following table summarizes the assessment rate for the district: Land Use Tvpe Single Family Multi-Family Commercial/Industrial Assessment Rate $39.97/SFD $39.97/DU $79.94/Acre C. Assessment All assessed lots or parcels within the District are listed on the assessment role, which is on file in the office of the City Clerk and the City Engineer, and hereby made a part of this Engineer's Report, by reference. The assessment roll states the net amount to be assessed upon all assessable lands within the District for Fiscal Year 2011/2012, and describes each assessable lot or parcel of land within the District. These lots and parcels are more particularly described on the County assessment Roll, which is on file in the office of the San Bernardino County Assessor and by reference is made a part of this Engineer's Report. 8 Section 4 -Annexations: Calendar Year 2007 Annexations Street Light Maintenance District No. 2 9 Section 5 -Assessment Diagrams: ~o N ~' ~ ~~ V ~ ~ ~fA ~` > ~_ J Q ' ~ O Q ~ ~ ~ ~ c I `~ = U . ~ ~ u~ o V ~ ~ ny I~JJay~ ~ 4 =, 1 .._.._.._..-' ~ J ti'r o ~ ~ ~ N ~ ^, V/ i C J m ~ O ~ ~ j N ~ m L o 0 3 ~ ~ i _.._.._.._ ~° . ~ ny lse~ in `~+ ~ ~ s v i ny epuenn!l~ ny epuenn!l3 ,~ i ~ ~ w ~ ~8 ~aaJ~ lea ~ . .._ ny Jalsayoo~ ! ~ ; ~ n Ja sa ~o d l u ~ ,~.. i ny ua~!II!W f._.._.._.._.._... ny ua~l!II!W ny uaneH ny uaneH ny esouJJaH (~ ny esowJaH nt/ Ple4!yoJt/ ny Ple4!yoJ`d ny uewllaH ~ ny ueuallaH ~ ~ w v ny p e~tau!/~ lS ue!IauJe~ ~Q=B ~Gi"T~Fsc i~}~e~~a e~syf ~~a 'O ~ i`aE :Y~ .i EaFsa: ~' % ~ 3 b ~ C L 'J _ m - O_' A~./ aAOJnn V J C/J ~ p apEi ~ f $ saa~~°°°=~E~~ ~~~ ~~~~a~~ VJ ~ ~ ~ ~ Q Y ~ i `~~£~~~~~~as ~ ~ ~ ~ m LL ~€~. £ . ` '~ C g ~~ s es`~ S~kF~a~; ~~g ~ to f0 m A p fi5~g~`~'s;~~x ig€ ' ~ g~ ~a~~ E~ ~~~~~° ~ a f~~~ 50 C `Z i ~a~~~e ;Q~~§ 8o°i'F i J aeb ~a ~ ~ ~tFa i~~s ~E N ~~ N ~ Z ~ ny epuemp ~+ ~ ~ . Q ~_ ^ N V ~ ~ ~ .4+ C V `L r ~ I'I 1n8U3~', ~ }~i _ .,,~ ~ n esouLa ~+ ~ ~+ ~ ntl Ple ~ L ''~iA~+ v/ ny uewpa~ ~g ue!lawe a ~ ~ ~ ~ N ~ A`~ W ~ ~ ~ ~ N m ~ W D ~, = U ~ L ~ cn U L D ne k2i2l3H~ • z ~ .~ J i! >' 7 N ~ - ~ ~ c .Y s`~ m q m o 0 lL t nd lsd3 tl'Se3 -- ~; ~ ~ a Z ,~y ~ ' s, ~ ---- ~ ' ~ ibypJ ~~ nd~b'aN`dMlt3 I I C ~ puem!~3 N o ~ cn _ N ii QJ ~ ;`f BYO ` ~ ~ ~8-~1332i~ ~1t10 . - ~~ ~ ~ _ _ _ ~ ~ -- ~ ntl~aisayoo ni O ~ ~ 4L-I J ~ F ;Q _ nH!b31S3H~02i !;; ,yj` - ~-, j2 ~_ ~ ~ - {sayaoa ~i (~ ~%FS - - z a ~ ua~l!II!W } ~o _ fnd~N3i~n~t~~iw ~ ~ ~ o uaneH I I I r ICI CV ~ I ~ ~ - - - I ~ nt/ NHW~l3H ~ ~ ~v uewllaH ~ Z„^ - l~ _ P ~tit• L a m Q~~i ~ ! Z q .. ~ ''rn ~ ~ . :i~ ,~ y pie6au!n ~ ~ ,~r ~ i : ~ ~ ~ H i~--t ~ li ~ ~ I ~ ' ~ ~ rn ,~ ~='s~ Q1 ~ • _ ~ E r E?_'E~ c c p 1S~32iIHd'd*b`S i v w w. ~ S m a €~€~"~'=,awixss ~`°~ c J m ~ _ - crzo3~e nyanaJ ~ E s - 'c g E~ k u? r ` ^ ~ L _ y y m = _ te --_ .. S R E ~ S~ a € m 0 LL ~ ~ __ F ~ . ~ ~ z ~ ..E ~ ` C ~ i 9 ~ 2~ c ~~ ~~ d Y ~ ~ a_ of° dE a5o° ~ .y m - - ~~ c ° o y o m_ u F S ~u q u y, 6 _ _ ~~ ~t~€~ =-2E9 i ., A° ~~- o _. ~ L c~ A Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2011/2012 City of Rancho Cucamonga Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3 (Victoria Planned Community) ENGINEER'S REPORT AFFIDAVIT Rancho Cucamonga Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3 (Victoria Planned Community) City of Rancho Cucamonga San Bernardino County, State of California This Report describes the District and all relevant zones therein including the improvements, budgets, parcels and assessments to be levied for fiscal year 2011/2012, as they existed at the time of the passage of the Resolution of Intention. Reference is hereby made to the San Bernardino County assessor's maps for a detailed description of the lines and dimensions of parcels within the District. The undersigned respectively submits the enclosed Report as directed by the City Council. Dated this 6~h y of J ly 011 Approved by. --~"~~~L~ Mark Steuer, City Engineer 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS OVERVIEW .........................................................................................4 SECTION 1 -DESCRIPTION OF FACILITIES ............................................5 SECTION 2 -ESTIMATE OF COSTS AND EXPENSES ..............................6 SECTION 3 -METHOD OF ASSESSMENT APPORTIONMENT ...................7 A. GENERAL ......................................................................7 B. ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY .......................................7 C. ASSESSMENT ................................................................8 SECTION 4 -ANNEXATIONS ................................................................9 SECTION 5 -ASSESSMENT DIAGRAMS ..............................................10 3 Overview The FY 2011/2012 Annual Report for Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3 (Victoria Planned Community) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Part 2, Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Street Lighting and Light Act of 1972). Section 1 Description of Facilities The plans and specifications for improvements maintained by the Assessment District consist of a general description of the nature, location, and the extent of the improvements proposed to be maintained, and are attached hereto. Section 2 Estimates of Cost and Expenses An estimate of the maintenance cost of the improvements, including incidental costs and expenses in connection therewith for FY 2011/2012, is set forth on the lists thereof, attached hereto. Section 3 Method of Assessment Apportionment Discuses the methodology used for calculating assessments in the District. The method reflects the composition of the parcels, and the improvements and services provided, to fairly apportion the costs based on benefit to each parcel. The assessment roll states the net amount to be assessed upon all assessable lands within the District for FY 2011/2012, and describes each assessable lot or parcel of land within the District. These lots and parcels are more particularly described on the County assessment Roll, which is on file in the office of the San Bernardino County Assessor and by reference is made a part of this Engineer's Report Section 4 Annexations List the developments, which have annexed to the Street Lighting Maintenance District within Calendar year 2007. Section 5 Assessment Diagrams Shows the boundaries of the areas to be annexed to the Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3 and the general boundaries of the District. For details regarding the boundaries and dimensions of the respective parcels and subdivisions of land within the Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3, refer to the San Bernardino County Assessor's maps. 4 Section 1 -Description of Facilities: Street Light Maintenance District No. 3 (SLD #3) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located within the Victoria Planned Community. Generally, this area encompasses the area of the City east of Deer Creek Channel, south of Highland Avenue, north of Base Line Road, and west of Etiwanda Avenue. It has been determined that the facilities in this district benefit the properties within this area of the City. This sites maintained by the district consist of streetlights on local streets and traffic signals (or a portion thereof) on local streets within the Victoria Planned Community. Typically, street lights are installed by private development as a condition of a development project's approval. Traffic signals can be installed by development or as a City capital improvement project. Historically, the installation of street lights and traffic signals has not been funded with Street Light District funds, however, this is permitted under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972. Any new street lights in areas to be maintained by the District will become part of the active work program at such time as these new areas are annexed into the District. The normal process will be the dedication of the areas to the City, at which time a sufficient non-refundable deposit will be made by the developer to the City. This deposit will provide for costs of energizing and six months of ordinary and usual maintenance, operation and servicing of the street lights in each development at the time of initial operation of the lighting system. The costs will be based on the number and type of street lights and based on Southern California Edison Company's rate for street lights. Immediately upon energization of the street lights, those street lights will become a part of the work program of the district 5 Section 2 -Estimate of Costs and Expenses: The majority of the budgeted operating costs for SLD #3 are for electric utility charges for the street lights and traffic signals within the district. The projected costs to operate and maintain SLD #3 are as follows: District Budget Estimated 2011/12 Budget Personnel Services Regular Salaries $22,080.00 Part-time Salaries 12,700.00 Fringe Benefits 11.780.00 Subtotal Personnel $46,560.00 Operations and Maintenance Operations and Maintenance $10,150.00 Equipment Operations and Maintenance 0.00 Contract Services 0.00 Utilities Telephone Utilities 0.00 Electric Utilities 294,920.00 Assessment Administration 35,180.00 General Overhead 24,130.00 Interfund Allocation 16.290.00 Subtotal Operations and Maintenance $380,670.00 Capital Expenditures Capital Proiecls 0.00 Subtotal Capital Expenditures 0.00 Total District Expenditure Budget ~ $427,230.00 Total Estimated Assessment $349,650.00 Less Anticipated Delinquencies (11.550.00) Total Estimated Revenue $338,100.00 Plus Operating Reserve Fund Contribution 89.130.00 Total Expenditure Budget $427,230.00 Total Estimated Assessment $349,650.00 Total District EBU Count .00 Actual Assessment per EBU -Fiscal Year 2011/12 $47.15 Maximum Allowable Assessment er F;BU -Fiscal Year 201 I/12 $47.15 6 Section 3 -Method of Assessment Apportionment: A. General The 1972 Act permits the establishments of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include construction, maintenance and servicing of public lights, landscaping and appurtenant facilities. The 1972 Act further requires that the cost of these improvements be levied according to benefit rather than assessed value: "The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements. " The formula used for calculating assessments in the District therefore reflects the composition of the parcels, and the improvements and services provided, to fairly apportion the costs based on benefit to each parcel. B. Assessment Methodology Equivalent Dwelling Units: To assess benefits equitably, it is necessary to relate the different types of parcel improvements to each other. The Equivalent Dwelling Unit method of apportionment uses the single-family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single family home equals one The Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU). Every other land-use is converted to EDU's based on an assessment formula that equates the property's specific development status, type of development (land-use), and size of the property, as compared to asingle-family home (SFR). The EDU method of apportioning benefit is typically seen as the most appropriate and equitable assessment methodology for calculating benefit in districts formed under the 1972 Act, as the benefit to each parcel from improvements are apportioned as a function of land-use type, size and development. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land-use types to determine each parcel's EDU. LAND-USE/EQUIVALENT DWELLING UNITS Property Type EDU Value Multiplier Commercial 2.00 Acres Vacant 2.00 Acres Single Family Residential 1.00 Parcel Multi-Family Residential 1.00 Parcel 7 The following table summarizes the assessment rate for the district: Land Use Tvpe Single Family Multi-Family Commercial/Industrial Assessment Rate $47.15/SFD $47.15/DU $94.30/Acre C. Assessment All assessed lots or parcels within the District are listed on the assessment role, which is on file in the office of the City Clerk and the City Engineer, and hereby made a part of this Engineer's Report, by reference. The assessment roll states the net amount to be assessed upon all assessable lands within the District for Fiscal Year 2011/2012, and describes each assessable lot or parcel of land within the District. These lots and parcels are more particularly described on the County assessment Roll, which is on file in the office of the San Bernardino County Assessor and by reference is made a part of this Engineer's Report. 8 Section 4 -Annexations: Calendar Year 2007 Annexations Street Light Maintenance District No. 3 PROJECT UNITS ANNEX DATE NO ANNEXATIONS Section 5 -Assessment Diagrams: ~o M '~ y.+ V ~~ J Ch 4 ~ ~ = U (~ ~ ~ ~ ~ `~ ny I(JJay~ Of r0 V ~ ~ ~ -~ ~r ` ..-..-..-..-~ ~ J ti'r o N ~ ~ ~, "' C ~ ~ m ~ ~ 0 a~ - `~+ j ~ ~ 3 ~ o ~~ ~ m tai Q 1 .-..-..-..-..~..-..-..-..-. j ~ i ny lsa3 in t Yr~ ~ ~ ~ }~ 1 ntJ epUaMll~ i ny epueMl;3 ~~ 1 : 1 J i y.+ ~ ~8 ~aaJ~ lea i ny Ja~sayoo~ ! n Ja sa o0 y i i d ~ y~ ,~..~ ! i i ny ua~!II!W r'_.._.._.._..-..: ! ny ua~!II!W I i 1 I 1 1 ny uanrrH ~ ~ i ind uaneH _ ; j ! ny esouJJaH i ! ny esowJaH i i n`d Piaq!yoJb` ~ j n`d PIa4!yoJ`d ny urruailaH i ~•~" ~ ny uet.ullaH i or'• `~ w i ~ v ny pJe~(au!n lS ue!IauJe~ ~ i i ri ~..-. I r~ ~~g€E_~~ ~ ~ ~../ ;'a ai Y$ €~ •~. .- w a pcy p W+ r ~ O ` C4.9 So ~=.nS Q' C m LL ~ ~sS~~ai~~~~€~ ~E L~ i~~e r ~aa C ~~~S Y~g~~°R V1 (6 fis~ ~~'ZP€a~ 2 m tg~~~~~~ee= T. ~"" ~gpF;sa3 r~ Qoa ne~n~feq J ~E~s&~~I!sso0 Sys ~ L > ~ ` ~ Q Ab'1S`d3 ..~..~..~..~..~..~..~. ~..~..~..~..~. _ S~~ Q ~ O O 2 ; ~ ~ J 3 r to v> >, ~ ~ ~ C ~ '~j~ y ~ ~ O .~.. ~ (A m O ~ ~ o sl~ ~ U M m U ~, ~ D N ti • • : •• ••. • •••• : i• .. • : :•: :: ;•• • . ~ /~tflfONdM113 Ul U ~ (n ~ ~ t • :..• j • . • • .•. o, • •~~•••r • • • ? ••• ? • i ••.•• • • i ; _ ~ • •• ~ 1 .,t~ ; ~ ,; a h•• •: }•; r•':: •• • • • • • ~ , ii ' .. •••!" •• ;~••r • • . Mj •• • ~••• • NJ ~g • • • ••~•• ~ • i <r •• Z Z ••i • • jf i i i ••j • • ••i '~••• • •••• :• • • = f ~ ~ ~ o~ o •••ri•••• • • • •• • • • • •• • •• • •• • • ••~•••~ • Q • ~O 18 ~i332i~ ltla•• • • •• ••.i~•. • • • • •• • ~ • • 0 0 Z •• ••• : • ••N••• V/ Y •i • i i • •••••~ M ~ ~ ra •••i•..• a •••~•....• ~•• nda3ls d m !~ _• s • • •••• • ••• • j~ O = O .. .. .... ti . • ..•s :•. • ~+ • o t. f•. ..• ~ •"'7. •~• . ~ •.• ~' 1 ~ ~ ~C 0 N ti. =ti•:•~•:f ••~•: S•: j•••ti :••••s • •~ ••••~ •• • ••••• ;~ ••j •••~ ••~ ~O a ; •~•~•••• /1d,N3111111~ ••t'b \ O ~ _ ('f in O 1•••• •• • 4• ~ ~•1 ~•tt ~~~• ~ • w• M' • • • • • • • ~ J '~F~ ~ V • ~ O N • i • i • • •± • ~ •• • • •~_•; •• •i i • •• ~' ~ ~ ~ j t ~ 7 • •• • ~ •• • • • • • • • • ••• • i r i • ~ ~ •••i• . (A m ~ ~ ~ ~ ~' L a ~ n . r ~•• .•• ~•~s•L• ~ . ,~ ~ • ~ ~ o y ~ ..•v••1••,~ • :• ~ ~ ~ •••i= _ _ .~ f+ (~ ~/~ •? ~ ~ ~ m 3 `o `• O //~~~~ W @~~~Ve-5@~9~~,. }~ W _t CEc?o.~=E ~E ~F ~~e ~ ~ ~ ` y ` c E ~ ~ ~ _ - ° 3 ~ _ S ~ ~ EE J Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2011/2012 City of Rancho Cucamonga Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 4 (Terra Vista Planned Community) ENGINEER'S REPORT AFFIDAVIT Rancho Cucamonga Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 4 (Terra Vista Planned Community) City of Rancho Cucamonga San Bernardino County, State of California This Report describes the District and all relevant zones therein including the improvements, budgets, parcels and assessments to be levied for fiscal year 2011/2012, as they existed at the time of the passage of the Resolution of Intention. Reference is hereby made to the San Bernardino County assessor's maps for a detailed description of the lines and dimensions of parcels within the District. The undersigned respectively submits the enclosed Report as directed by the City Council. Dated this 6~n day of Jul , 2011. Approved by: Mark A, Steuer, City Engineer 0 TABLE OF CONTENTS OVERVIEW .........................................................................................4 SECTION 1 -DESCRIPTION OF FACILITIES ............................................5 SECTION 2 -ESTIMATE OF COSTS AND EXPENSES ..............................6 SECTION 3 -METHOD OF ASSESSMENT APPORTIONMENT ...................7 A. GENERAL ......................................................................7 B. ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY .......................................7 C. ASSESSMENT ................................................................8 SECTION 4 -ANNEXATIONS ................................................................9 SECTION 5 -ASSESSMENT DIAGRAMS ..............................................10 Overview The FY 2011/2012 Annual Report for Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 4 (Terra Vista Planned Community) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Part 2, Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Street Lighting and Light Act of 1972). Section 1 Description of Facilities The plans and specifications for improvements maintained by the Assessment District consist of a general description of the nature, location, and the extent of the improvements proposed to be maintained, and are attached hereto. Section 2 Estimates of Cost and Expenses An estimate of the maintenance cost of the improvements, including incidental costs and expenses in connection therewith for FY 2011/2012, is set forth on the lists thereof, attached hereto. Section 3 Method of Assessment Apportionment Discuses the methodology used for calculating assessments in the District. The method reflects the composition of the parcels, and the improvements and services provided, to fairly apportion the costs based on benefit to each parcel. The assessment roll states the net amount to be assessed upon all assessable lands within the District for FY 2011/2012, and describes each assessable lot or parcel of land within the District. These lots and parcels are more particularly described on the County assessment Roll, which is on file in the office of the San Bernardino County Assessor and by reference is made a part of this Engineer's Report Section 4 Annexations List the developments, which have annexed to the Street Lighting Maintenance District within Calendar year 2010. Section 5 Assessment Diagrams Shows the boundaries of the areas to be annexed to the Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 4 and the general boundaries of the District. For details regarding the boundaries and dimensions of the respective parcels and subdivisions of land within the Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 4, refer to the San Bernardino County Assessor's maps. 4 Section 1 -Description of Facilities: Street Light Maintenance District No. 4 (SLD #4) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located within the Terra Vista Planned Community. Generally, this area encompasses the residential area of the City east of Haven Avenue, south of Base Line Road, north of Foothill Boulevard and west of Rochester Avenue. It has been determined that the facilities in this district benefit the properties within this area of the City. This sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on~local streets and traffic signals (or a portion thereof) on local streets within the Terra Vista Planned Community. Typically, street lights are installed by private development as a condition of a development project's approval. Traffic signals can be installed by development or as a City capital improvement project. Historically, the installation of street lights and traffic signals has not been funded with Street Light District funds, however, this is permitted under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972. Any new street lights in areas to be maintained by the District will become part of the active work program at such time as these new areas are annexed into the District. The normal process will be the dedication of the areas to the City, at which time a sufficient non-refundable deposit will be made by the developer to the City. This deposit will provide for costs of energizing and six months of ordinary and usual maintenance, operation and servicing of the street lights in each development at the time of initial operation of the lighting system. The costs will be based on the number and type of street lights and based on Southern California Edison Company's rate for street lights. Immediately upon energization of the street lights, those street lights will become a part of the work program of the district street lights, those street lights will become a part of the work program of the district. 5 Section 2 -Estimate of Costs and Expenses: The majority of the budgeted operating costs for SLD #4 are for electric utility charges for the street lights and traffic signals within the district. The projected costs to operate and maintain SLD #4 are as follows: District Budget Estimated 2011/12 Budget Personnel Services Regular Salaries $22,080.00 Part-time Salaries 12,700.00 Fringe Benefits 11.780.00 Subtotal Personnel $46,560.00 Operations and Maintenance Operations and Maintenance $5,150.00 Equipment Operations and Maintenance 500.00 Contract Services 0.00 Utilities Telephone Utilities 0.00 Electric Utilities 141,160.00 Assessment Administration 22,970.00 General Overhead 11,110.00 Interfund Allocation 0.00 Subtotal Operations and Maintenance $180,890.00 Capital Expenditures Capital Projects 0.00 Subtotal Capital Expenditures 0.00 Total District Expenditure Budget ~ $227,450.00 Total Estimated Assessment $163,930.00 Less Anticipated Delinquencies (3.480.001 Total Estimated Revenue $160,450.00 Plus Operating Reserve Fund Contribution 67.000.00 Total Expenditure Budget $227,450.00 Total Estimated Assessment $163,930.00 Total District EBU Count 00 Actual Assessment per EBU -Fiscal Year 2011/12 $28.96 Maximum Allowable Assessment er L'BU-Fiscal Ycar 2011/12 $28.96 6 Section 3 -Method of Assessment Apportionment: A. General The 1972 Act permits the establishments of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include construction, maintenance and servicing of public lights, landscaping and appurtenant facilities. The 1972 Act further requires that the cost of these improvements be levied according to benefit rather than assessed value: "The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements." The formula used for calculating assessments in the District therefore reflects the composition of the parcels, and the improvements and services provided, to fairly apportion the costs based on benefit to each parcel. B. Assessment Methodology Equivalent Dwelling Units: To assess benefits equitably, it is necessary to relate the different types of parcel improvements to each other. The Equivalent Dwelling Unit method of apportionment uses the single-family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single family home equals one The Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU). Every other land-use is converted to EDU's based on an assessment formula that equates the property's specific development status, type of development (land-use), and size of the property, as compared to asingle-family home (SFR). The EDU method of apportioning benefit is typically seen as the most appropriate and equitable assessment methodology for calculating benefit in districts formed under the 1972 Act, as the benefit to each parcel from improvements are apportioned as a function of land-use type, size and development. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land-use types to determine each parcel's EDU. LAND-USE/EQUIVALENT DWELLING UNITS EDU Value Mu Commercial 2.00 Acres Vacant 2.00 Acres Multi-Family 0.5 Unit Single Family Residential 1.00 Parcel 7 The following table summarizes the assessment rate for the district: Land Use Type Single Family Multi-Family Commercial/Industrial Assessment Rate $28.96/SFD $14.48/DU $57.92/Acre C. Assessment All assessed lots or parcels within the District are listed on the assessment role, which is on file in the office of the City Clerk and the City Engineer, and hereby made a part of this Engineer's Report, by reference. The assessment roll states the net amount to be assessed upon all assessable lands within the District for Fiscal Year 2011/2012 and describes each assessable lot or parcel of land within the District. These lots and parcels are more particularly described on the County assessment Roll, which is on file in the office of the San Bernardino County Assessor and by reference is made a part of this Engineer's Report. 8 Section 4 -Annexations: Calendar Year 2010 Annexations Street Light Maintenance District No. 4 PROJECT UNITS ANNEX DATE NO ANNEXATIONS Section 5 -Assessment Diagrams: io ~' '~F.r V .~ ~1.+ .~ V A~ W ~r ~~ w .~ ~F.+ ny ua~!II!W ny uaneH nb esouaaaH nb Pleq!4o~b ny ueuallaH ;g ue!lau~e~ :, ~, \\ - u ny as}sayoo~{ ny ua~!II!W -~ j nb uaneH 1 ;ny esoua~aH I t I - i ny Pleq!4o~`d i r'' ~ ny ueuallaH ~t••~• cL'o ~ i ny pae~(au!n ' . ~ •~' in •~. ~ in m ~ •~• ~ J = 3 m Q ~ c ~ ~° m ~ ' c vi __ m m 2 c 0 ny epuenn!;3 e ~aaa~ lea ny ~a~sauoo~ ny ~(.uay~ C _ J m ~ ~ ~ m p O P L L Q E J ~ ~' ~ ~ U ~ ~ ~. ti~ J ti•r a~ ~~ 0 0 u-~ N O ny;set ~ v ..._.._.._ ~ I ny epuenn!}~ r ~ c rn - ~ ~ a - N c _ c o ~ nt/ 2l3153H~021 ROC - -- ~ U ~ m ~ m ~ ~ -. F- U In I ~\ --- O ~ - I ~~ Y Z ~ -- I -~ ~ a Ow ~ Q~ __- i Z 1- }' V O Q CC_ C ,} ~ - ~>~~~ ~~~-iµ~ cv _ ~~ ~ ~ YY ~ ~ ~ ^ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ntlN3~11~1IW .~ ~ w O _ ~ z L J (n m Z ~ ~ ~ C9 a ~ r ~^ _ ~ ~ ~ N ~ ~a J ~ ~ ~ N ~ d • ~ J FOY ~ ~ Z L ~~ /•/"~~~ W Ov U a m J \/• L ~ _ O O a a z w w U J K m "\ . ! ~~ ! =m~~~ G~~ J~~ ==J = ~~=-~~-- o s ~ F~ e ~ = c ~° 5 E ~ E { ~: _ ~ ~ o ~'-'~ ` ~ ~ € V ~ o - aF' m.~ m' ~ d ~ A d,? ~~ o . ~~ o ~ ~, L~Lr~os Aga"~~~~o 7 ~ E'no ~~ o . €°_ ~b _. a~6v _ „_ 45ry~€~`~~~0.- u~ _ ~~ vz tai -~ 9 E € o~' o L C F° v ~.E- c V ro y S c ~ _ ~ ~ r- o F- .. ° ~ ~ :t ~ ~ t: r u A K ~ ~ ~ HAVEN m ~ nd N~n dH Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2010/2011 City of Rancho Cucamonga Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 5 (Caryn Community) ENGINEER'S REPORT AFFIDAVIT Rancho Cucamonga Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 5 (Caryn Community) City of Rancho Cucamonga San Bernardino County, State of California This Report describes the District and all relevant sections therein including the improvements, budgets, parcels and assessments to be levied for fiscal year 2008/2009, as they existed at the time of the passage of the Resolution of Intention. Reference is hereby made to the San Bernardino County assessor's maps for a detailed description of the lines and dimensions of parcels within the District. The undersigned respectively submits the enclosed Report as directed by the City Council. Dated this 6~h day of July, 2011 Approved by: --~~Z Mark A. Steuer, City Engineer TABLE OF CONTENTS OVERVIEW .........................................................................................4 SECTION 1 -DESCRIPTION OF FACILITIES ............................................5 SECTION 2 -ESTIMATE OF COSTS AND EXPENSES ..............................6 SECTION 3 -METHOD OF ASSESSMENT APPORTIONMENT ...................7 A. GENERAL ......................................................................7 B. ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY .......................................7 C. ASSESSMENT ................................................................8 SECTION 4 -ANNEXATIONS ................................................................9 SECTION 5 -ASSESSMENT DIAGRAMS ..............................................10 3 Overview The FY 2010/2012 Annual Report for Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 5 (Caryn Community) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Part 2, Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Street Lighting and Light Act of 1972). Section 1 Description of Facilities The plans and specifications for improvements maintained by the Assessment District consist of a general description of the nature, location, and the extent of the improvements proposed to be maintained, and are attached hereto. Section 2 Estimates of Cost and Expenses An estimate of the maintenance cost of the improvements, including incidental costs and expenses in connection therewith for FY 2008/2009, is set forth on the lists thereof, attached hereto. Section 3 Method of Assessment Apportionment Discuses the methodology used for calculating assessments in the District. The method reflects the composition of the parcels, and the improvements and services provided, to fairly apportion the costs based on benefit to each parcel. The assessment roll states the net amount to be assessed upon all assessable lands within the District for FY 2011/2012, and describes each assessable lot or parcel of land within the District. These lots and parcels are more particularly described on the County assessment Roll, which is on file in the office of the San Bernardino County Assessor and by reference is made a part of this Engineer's Report Section 4 Annexations List the developments, which have annexed to the Street Lighting Maintenance District within Calendar year 2010. Section 5 Assessment Diagrams Shows the boundaries of the areas to be annexed to the Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 5 and the general boundaries of the District. For details regarding the boundaries and dimensions of the respective parcels and subdivisions of land within the Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 5, refer to the San Bernardino County Assessor's maps. 4 Section 1 -Description of Facilities: Street Light Maintenance District No. 5 (SLD #5) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located within the Caryn Planned Community. Generally, this area encompasses the area of the City east of Milliken Avenue, south of Banyan Street, north of Highland Avenue and west of Rochester Avenue. It has been determined that the facilities in this district benefit the properties within this area of the City. This sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on local streets and traffic signals (or a portion thereof) on local streets within the Caryn Planned Community. Typically, street lights are installed by private development as a condition of a development project's approval. Traffic signals can be installed by development or as a City capital improvement project. Historically, the installation of street lights and traffic signals has not been funded with Street Light District funds; however, this is permitted under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972. Any new street lights in areas to be maintained by the District will become part of the active work program at such time as these new areas are annexed into the District. The normal process will be the dedication of the areas to the City, at which time a sufficient non-refundable deposit will be made by the developer to the City. This deposit will provide for costs of energizing and six months of ordinary and usual maintenance, operation and servicing of the street lights in each development at the time of initial operation of the lighting system. The costs will be based on the number and type of street lights and based on Southern California Edison Company's rate for street lights. Immediately upon energization of the street lights, those street lights will become a part of the work program of the district. 5 Section 2 -Estimate of Costs and Expenses: The majority of the budgeted operating costs for SLD #5 are for electric utility charges for the street lights and traffic signals within the district. The projected costs to operate and maintain SLD #5 are as follows: District Budget Estimated 2011/12 Budget Personnel Services Regular Salaries $6.900.00 Parf-time Salaries 0.00 Fringe Benefits 3.240.00 Subtotal Personnel $10,140.00 Operations and Maintenance Operations and Maintenance $7,650.00 Equipment Operations and Maintenance 0.00 Contract Services 0.00 Utilities Telephone Utilities 0.00 Electric Utilities 54,900.00 Assessment Administration 7,020.00 General Overhead 3,100.00 Interfund Allocation 0.00 Subtotal Operations and Maintenance $72,670.00 Capital Expenditures Capital Projects O.OD Subtotal Capital Expenditures 0.00 Total District Expenditure Budget ~ $1,090,340.00 Total Estimated Assessment $44,150.00 Less Anticipated Delinquencies 1 7{ 80.00) Total Estimated Revenue $42,370.00 Plus Operating Reserve Fund Contribution 40.440.00 Total Expenditure Budget $82,810.00 Total Estimated Assessment $44,150.00 Total District EBU Count ~ 1276 Actual Assessment per EBU -Fiscal Year 2011/12 $34.60 Maximum Allowable Assessment er F BU -Fiscal Ycar 2011/12 $34.60 6 Section 3 -Method of Assessment Apportionment: A. General The 1972 Act permits the establishments of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include construction, maintenance and servicing of public lights, landscaping and appurtenant facilities. The 1972 Act further requires that the cost of these improvements be levied according to benefit rather than assessed value: "The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements. " The formula used for calculating assessments in the District therefore reflects the composition of the parcels, and the improvements and services provided, to fairly apportion the costs based on benefit to each parcel. B. Assessment Methodology Equivalent Dwelling Units: To assess benefits equitably, it is necessary to relate the different types of parcel improvements to each other. The Equivalent Dwelling Unit method of apportionment uses the single-family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single family home equals one The Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU). Every other land-use is converted to EDU's based on an assessment formula that equates the property's specific development status, type of development (land-use), and size of the property, as compared to asingle-family home (SFR). The EDU method of apportioning benefit is typically seen as the most appropriate and equitable assessment methodology for calculating benefit in districts formed under the 1972 Act, as the benefit to each parcel from improvements are apportioned as a function of land-use type, size and development. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land-use types to determine each parcel's EDU. LAND-USE/EQUIVALENT DWELLING UNITS EDU Value Mu ier Single Family Residential 1.00 Multi-Family Residential 1.00 Commercial/Industrial 2.00 Vacant 2.00 Unit Acres Acres 7 The following table summarizes the assessment rate for the district: Land Use Tvpe Assessment Rate Single Family $34.60/SFD C. Assessment All assessed lots or parcels within the District are listed on the assessment role, which is on file in the office of the City Clerk and the City Engineer, and hereby made a part of this Engineer's Report, by reference. The assessment roll states the net amount to be assessed upon all assessable lands within the District for Fiscal Year 2011/2012, and describes each assessable lot or parcel of land within the District. These lots and parcels are more particularly described on the County assessment Roll, which is on file in the office of the San Bernardino County Assessor and by reference is made a part of this Engineer's Report. 8 Section 4 -Annexations: Calendar Year 2010 Annexations Street Light Maintenance District No. 5 PROJECT UNITS ANNEX DATE NO ANNEXATIONS 9 Section 5 -Assessment Diagrams: ~o rtr V 'i .y V A~ W ~~ ~~ y.+ i ny ua~!II!W ny uaneH ny esow~aH nd Pleq!4oab' ny uewllaH }S ue!lauae~ 2 _ [~ Z C 6 ~ - U c ~ ` ~_ 1 ny epuenn!}~ ' 8 ~aa~~ ~(ea ny as}sayooH ny as}sayoo~{ ny ua~!II!W jny uaneH 1 -__ __ ; S ! ny esow~aH jnd ple4!4o~`d i ~' ~ ny UewllaH ..~~ r ~ o '. v ny pae~(au!n i 1 . j ~ L` ~ ~£~~Fy~€9agi _ nyano~~ ~o~° ~~ ea~ w .~. ~. .' ~ ~ m ~ ~~ ~ ~ Sao Fs~`p Fg gac $. u a -- ~ ~ ~ C a ~ m O l.L ~ c~~ge6~{~~gsr~ ~ =°~~~Sge~~~E~ v ' 4 ~ '~ (6 A C _ ~' 8a ga p tii ~`t~,8~~ga=q Y~~~+'IIEIip ( m ~~a$g ~~$$?~~ s ` ~ 8~ ~ g ; 5~Fu ~ . gu3$€ogggE~3 ~~~[Q. ~3 OFF CQq~l~fi w~ b Qo o ES ° ~ ~ E L EJUE~NUCC1 o4 ~ ~ m~ ° g $~ e s~e? a~ ~~ nd ti~a4~ O~ r~ ~ t a J ~'r o ~ N ~ N C_ _ O J Q] ~ ton N t (a +-' m ~ O a` ~~ .._.._.._....._.._.._.._.._ i ny }sea c"n ® i ny epuenn!}~ i J ~ = U ~ G1 Z a -------------- a z LL ~ ~ rn ~' ~ p O ~ N _o N _ ~, m c ~ ~ ~ c O ~ O m ~ m ~ U ~' ~ cn U to -_- -• • I ~ • • • • • • • ~ ~ nd a31S3H~02i • "-~ ~ ~.- - t ~ ~ ~ ~ i N 0 ~ i • ~ • a -_ +j~ ~ Z ~ V C • ~ Z g f 1. I - _ ~_ ~ cV O .~ L ~ ~ • • ~ _ ~+ ~ L ~ N Z ~ _ • • • • _ ~___ _ __-- ---- -- - z • _ ~ • • _ ~ ~ • ' ~ ~ ~ ~ •- ~ ~ ~ • • •~ • • ~ ~+ V _ ~~ ------------------ ~ `~ • ° ~ o ^~ ~ + N L • v~ • • • • 1.() N Rf ' r - - p o ~ N _ ~-A z ~ .~ ~ ~• ~ • a Z w Y J ~ ~ ~ o % J - o ~ p ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ nd N3~miw • • ~ s `~' ~~ ~ ~ • • • a =~~'s= ! q Lg ~„ § \ FS S~ ~ I ~ _~ z~ N ~ _ p - a~a,;$~3~s;;r~y~~ ~~gg~..~~.~g~~3~e~~ ~ - ~~ ~~~ y~s ~ = ~@ A~~ Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2011/2012 City of Rancho Cucamonga Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 (Commercial/Industrial) ENGINEER'S REPORT AFFIDAVIT Rancho Cucamonga Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 (Commercial/Industrial) City of Rancho Cucamonga San Bernardino County, State of California This Report describes the District and all relevant zones therein including the improvements, budgets, parcels and assessments to be levied for fiscal year 201012012 as they existed at the time of the passage of the Resolution of Intention. Reference is hereby made to the San Bernardino County assessor's maps for a detailed description of the lines and dimensions of parcels within the District. The undersigned respectively submits the enclosed Report as directed by the City Council. Dated this 6~h day of July, 2011. Approved by: Mark A. Steuer, City Engineer 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS OVERVIEW .........................................................................................4 SECTION 1 -DESCRIPTION OF FACILITIES ............................................5 SECTION 2 -ESTIMATE OF COSTS AND EXPENSES ..............................6 SECTION 3 -METHOD OF ASSESSMENT APPORTIONMENT ...................7 A. GENERAL ......................................................................7 B. ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY .......................................7 C. ASSESSMENT ................................................................8 SECTION 4 -ANNEXATIONS ................................................................9 SECTION 5 -ASSESSMENT DIAGRAMS ..............................................10 3 Overview The FY 2011/2012 Annual Report for Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 (Commercial/Industrial) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Part 2, Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Street Lighting and Light Act of 1972). Section 1 Description of Facilities The plans and specifications for improvements maintained by the Assessment District consist of a general description of the nature, location, and the extent of the improvements proposed to be maintained, and are attached hereto. Section 2 Estimates of Cost and Expenses An estimate of the maintenance cost of the improvements, including incidental costs and expenses in connection therewith for FY 2011/2012, is set forth on the lists thereof. attached hereto. Section 3 Method of Assessment Apportionment Discuses the methodology used for calculating assessments in the District. The method reflects the composition of the parcels, and the improvements and services provided, to fairly apportion the costs based on benefit to each parcel. The assessment roll states the net amount to be assessed upon all assessable lands within the District for FY 2011/2012, and describes each assessable lot or parcel of land within the District. These lots and parcels are more particularly described on the County assessment Roll, which is on file in the office of the San Bernardino County Assessor and by reference is made a part of this Engineer's Report Section 4 Annexations List the developments, which have annexed to the Street Lighting Maintenance District within Calendar year 2010. Section 5 Assessment Diagrams Shows the boundaries of the areas to be annexed to the Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 and the general boundaries of the District. For details regarding the boundaries and dimensions of the respective parcels and subdivisions of land within the Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6, refer to the San Bernardino County Assessor's maps. 4 Section 1 -Description of Facilities: Street Light Maintenance District No. 6 (SLD #6) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located on commercial and industrial streets throughout the City but excluding those areas already in a local maintenance district. Generally, this area encompasses the industrial area of the City south of Foothill Boulevard. It has been determined that the facilities in this district benefit the properties within this area of the City. This sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on industrial or commercial streets and traffic signals (or a portion thereof) on industrial or commercial streets generally south of Foothill Boulevard. Typically, street lights are installed by private development as a condition of a development project's approval. Traffic signals can be installed by development or as a City capital improvement project. Historically, the installation of street lights and traffic signals has not been funded with Street Light District funds, however, this is permitted under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972. Any new street lights in areas to be maintained by the District will become part of the active work program at such time as these new areas are annexed into the District. The normal process will be the dedication of the areas to the City, at which time a sufficient non-refundable deposit will be made by the developer to the City. This deposit will provide for costs of energizing and six months of ordinary and usual maintenance, operation and servicing of the street lights in each development at the time of initial operation of the lighting system. The costs will be based on the number and type of street lights and based on Southern California Edison Company's rate for street lights. Immediately upon energization of the street lights, those street lights will become a part of the work program of the district 5 Section 2 -Estimate of Costs and Expenses: The majority of the budgeted operating costs for SLD #6 are for electric utility charges for the street lights and traffic signals within the district. The projected costs to operate and maintain SLD #6 are as follows: District Budget Estimated 2011112 Budget Personnel Services Regular Salaries $22,080.00 Part-time Salaries 12,700.00 Fringe Benefits 11.780.00 Subtotal Personnel $46,560.00 Operations and Maintenance Operations and Maintenance $7,150.00 Equipment Operations and Maintenance 400.00 Contrail Services 0.00 Utilities Telephone Utilities 0.00 Electric Utilities 94,790.00 Assessment Administration 5,490.00 General Overhead 8,990.00 Interfund Allocation 0.00 Subtotal Operations and Maintenance $116,820.00 Capital Expenditures Capital Projects 0.00 Subtotal Capital Expenditures 0.00 Total District Expenditure Budget ~ $163,380.00 Total Estimated Assessment $127,230.00 Less Anticipated Delinquencies 2 O( 30.00) Total Estimated Revenue $125,200.00 Plus Operating Reserve Fund Contribution 38.180.00 Total Expenditure Budget $163,380.00 Total Estimated Assessment $127,230.00 Total District EBU Count .00 Actual Assessment per Acre -Fiscal Year 2011/12 $51.40 Maximum Allowable Assessment er Acre- Fiscal Ycar 201 I/12 551.40 6 Section 3 -Method of Assessment Apportionment: A. General The 1972 Act permits the establishments of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include construction, maintenance and servicing of public lights, landscaping and appurtenant facilities. The 1972 Act further requires that the cost of these improvements be levied according to benefit rather than assessed value: "The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements. " The formula used for calculating assessments in the District therefore reflects the composition of the parcels, and the improvements and services provided, to fairly apportion the costs based on benefit to each parcel. B. Assessment Methodology Assessment Units: To assess benefits equitably, it is necessary to relate the different types of parcel improvements to each other. The Assessment Unit (AU) method of apportionment uses an acre as the basic unit of assessment. The AU method of apportioning benefit is typically seen as the most appropriate and equitable assessment methodology for calculating benefit in districts formed under the 1972 Act, as the benefit to each parcel from improvements are apportioned as a function of land-use type, size and development. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land-use types to determine each parcel's AU. LAND-USE/EQUIVALENT DWELLING UNITS Property Type EDU Value Multiplier Commercial/Industrial 1.00 Acres Vacant 2.00 Acres Single Family Residential 1.00 Unit Multi-Family Residential 1.00 Unit 7 The following table summarizes the assessment rate for the district: Land Use Tvpe Assessment Rate Commercial/Industrial $51.40/Acre C. Assessment All assessed lots or parcels within the District are listed on the assessment role, which is on file in the office of the City Clerk and the City Engineer, and hereby made a part of this Engineer's Report, by reference. The assessment roll states the net amount to be assessed upon all assessable lands within the District for Fiscal Year 2011/2012, and describes each assessable lot or parcel of land within the District. These lots and parcels are more particularly described on the County assessment Roll, which is on file in the office of the San Bernardino County Assessor and by reference is made a part of this Engineer's Report. 8 Section 4 -Annexations: Calendar Year 2007 Annexations Street Light Maintenance District No. 6 PROJECT UNITS ANNEX DATE NO ANNEXATIONS 9 Section 5 -Assessment Diagrams: io ~ ~ ~.+ _ ~ ~ V '~ ~ ~ ~+ > ~_ J CO Q . ~' ~ ~ ~ ~ ny /~~a4~ ~ '-~ o ~ ` .._.._.._.._. ~ J ti•r o I ~ N ~ ' C _ m ~ '*+ ~ j y ~ m r o 3 0 ~ ~ i t° _.._.._.._. Q ! nb }set ~n `Fd ~ ® L tf .L i nb epuenn!13 ny epuenn!}3 ~~ J ' ~ ~ ~e ~aa~~ ~(ea ~ ,~ ny ~a}sayooa ! n ~a sa o0 b } 4 2i y ~ ~~..~ I ? ny ua~!II!W r._.._.._.._.._.. ny ua~!II!W ny uaneH ny uaneH ny esow~aH ny esow~aH nb pleq!4o~b nb Pleq!4o~b ny uewllaH ~ ny uewllaH ~ ~ L ~ ny p e~(au !n }g ue!lawe~ :: s ~pp`s~e ~~FE~~~~ gg~ ~ ~., ~, ~ C _ m ,,., ~ ny anal ~ 95f~+~~ ~~a~ ggE a S~E~t$ p~,Z~~ _ ~ ~ rL.+ J ~ ~ ~ ~ - w O ~ O Q rL~+ 00 '~II~'s E~Y s~- Y.° a ~~S°as ~~~~$°s~ga~g ~ ~ m LL gs'~g.€~~ Y~~ -p C g *~ ~a~~~sn~~~:~ ~ = m ~~~~~ $Y~~~ ~~~ ~ 2C ~geyF e a Fy~n6 ~~~[ ~.~ p~ ~~ S ~, ~'' y" C boo aas~;~~~ E~~'~ $r~r s~ ~s' 6e - U ~~B P~ ~ z Q .~ o rn ~' -tea o '- m c '~s ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ m ~ m ~ Sys` U Y p nvxaa3H~ ~ U ~ o _o i ' J ~_ K 3 : ~ m - ~ 1, to u C ° nvlsv3 ~ "'~a9 N O ~ ntl Wuaw19! t 1 ~; ~ys~i Puermi13Mn3 Cf' Z Iny'yQN w; i~ nb^V4NVMIl3 c$ o N ++ Q. I ~ I od~o ~ ~ rn E ~ ,~, ~- S~ h N - ~ 19-~133a~ nea i 2 ~ ~ a -. ny~ O SV~I = a nv a31S3H~0a iF .~ = I ~ 71 • • ifVtlOOM°u C7 +~+ V ~11Z r~ i I' ueM!II!W ~~ (V _ ~ ~•~••~•~ z ~O [nVN3NIl~lIW I, m 'C~ ~ Q _o ~~ I; ' ~; > G L ~ m N II iii N Q K ~ 'a O K ~ F ti LL C y O ~? 2 0 2 ~ ~ tl"va~aW ~ ~ ~ ~ ~+ nH~N3nti'H ~ r ~ J '~ n acao~raly ~ V u~ m sMN7&'~°u ~+ ~ N -a me-HSOWa3H ~ "' d J `~ z ~ ~ d 2 o w ,N F- +L+ ~ nVp ~ ~ W ~ ° nv OlV91H~a6' IeWpuqu=~r ~ N ~ ~ w+ C -nv 1S/:F:113WV .N¢~ = N .x nV~~wIMN ~ u U ~d NVWll3H r ~ udlTif~Y z ~ ~s 1mA1a3911; Z i 2 H r w ~+~n Q rn ;~~ F- r V We~au~ m ~ N ~ tS ceneas3 ~ `r1ST1VIl3N21V~ I p m 2 ° \ ~ ~ _ w _ '_ s~ O a °u@ 3 LE.~i:i~y~e~ ~ 1S 3aIHddVS ~ - €: €.~6 E$e<`s3~s~ 2 I\ ~J 3 q ~n W~9 `c'z EY ~La ~95 oere~3 -l,YY~_ ,{n m f~ 3 Y ~ a ~ °cs ~ ~.S iC €s a.•m EIS€:=5"5=~k9 ~3EdC~e_:6 k~9E'SC ash a K se~oy659e a°~R~Re9 ~[[ aa- °g ~9O:u_~a5~_G Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2011/2012 City of Rancho Cucamonga Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 7 (North Etiwanda) ENGINEER'S REPORT AFFIDAVIT Rancho Cucamonga Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 7 (North Etiwanda) City of Rancho Cucamonga San Bernardino County, State of California This Report describes the District and all relevant zones therein including the improvements, budgets, parcels and assessments to be levied for fiscal year 2011/2012, as they existed at the time of the passage of the Resolution of Intention. Reference is hereby made to the San Bernardino County assessor's maps for a detailed description of the lines and dimensions of parcels within the District. The undersigned respectively submits the enclosed Report as directed by the City Council. Dated this 6~h day of July, 2011 Approved by: -~~~'f,~ Mark A, Steuer, City Engineer 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS OVERVIEW .........................................................................................4 SECTION 1 -DESCRIPTION OF FACILITIES ............................................5 SECTION 2 -ESTIMATE OF COSTS AND EXPENSES ..............................6 SECTION 3 -METHOD OF ASSESSMENT APPORTIONMENT ...................7 A. GENERAL ......................................................................7 B. ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY .......................................7 C. ASSESSMENT ................................................................8 SECTION 4 -ANNEXATIONS ................................................................9 SECTION 5 -ASSESSMENT DIAGRAMS ..............................................10 3 Overview The FY 2011/2012 Annual Report for Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 7 (North Etiwanda) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Part 2, Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Street Lighting and Light Act of 1972). Section 1 Description of Facilities The plans and specifications for improvements maintained by the Assessment District consist of a general description of the nature, location, and the extent of the improvements proposed to be maintained, and are attached hereto. Section 2 Estimates of Cost and Expenses An estimate of the maintenance cost of the improvements, including incidental costs and expenses in connection therewith for FY 2011/2012, is set forth on the lists thereof, attached hereto. Section 3 Method of Assessment Apportionment Discuses the methodology used for calculating assessments in the District. The method reflects the composition of the parcels, and the improvements and services provided, to fairly apportion the costs based on benefit to each parcel. The assessment roll states the net amount to be assessed upon all assessable lands within the District for FY 2011/2012, and describes each assessable lot or parcel of land within the District. These lots and parcels are more particularly described on the County assessment Roll, which is on file in the office of the San Bernardino County Assessor and by reference is made a part of this Engineer's Report. Section 4 Annexations List the developments, which have annexed to the Street Lighting Maintenance District within Calendar year 2010. Section 5 Assessment Diagrams Shows the boundaries of the areas to be annexed to the Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 7 and the general boundaries of the District. For details regarding the boundaries and dimensions of the respective parcels and subdivisions of land within the Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 7, refer to the San Bernardino County Assessor's maps. 4 Section 1 -Description of Facilities: Street Light Maintenance District No. 7 (SLD #7) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located on local streets in what is termed the North Etiwanda area of the City. Generally, this area encompasses the area of the City east of Day Creek Channel and north of Highland Avenue within the incorporated area of the city. It has been determined that the facilities in this district benefit the properties within this area of the City. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on local streets and traffic signals (or a portion thereof) on local streets within the North Etiwanda area. Typically, street lights are installed by private development as a condition of a development project's approval. Traffic signals can be installed by development or as a City capital improvement project. Historically, the installation of street lights and traffic signals has not been funded with Street Light District funds, however, this is permitted under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972. Any new street lights in areas to be maintained by the District will become part of the active work program at such time as these new areas are annexed into the District. The normal process will be the dedication of the areas to the City, at which time a sufficient non-refundable deposit will be made by the developer to the City. This deposit will provide for costs of energizing and six months of ordinary and usual maintenance, operation and servicing of the street lights in each development at the time of initial operation of the lighting system. The costs will be based on the number and type of street lights and based on Southern California Edison Company's rate for street lights. Immediately upon energization of the street lights, those street lights will become a part of the work program of the district. 5 Section 2 -Estimate of Costs and Expenses: The majority of the budgeted operating costs for SLD #7 are for electric utility charges for the street lights and traffic signals within the district. The projected costs to operate and maintain SLD #7 are as follows: District Budget Estimated 2011/12 Budget Personnel Services Regular Salaries $22,080.00 Part-time Salaries 12,700.00 Fringe Benefits 11.780.00 Subtotal Personnel $46,560.00 Operations and Maintenance Operations and Maintenance $5,150.00 Equipment Operations and Maintenance 0.00 Contract Services 14,670.00 Utilities Telephone Utilities 0.00 Electric Utilities 201,320.00 Assessment Administration 17,170.00 General Overhead 7,180.00 Interfund Allocation 16.290.00 Subtotal Operations and Maintenance $261,780.00 Capital Expenditures Capital Projects 0.00 Subtotal Capital Expenditures 0.00 Total District Expenditure Budget ~ $308,340.00 Total Estimated Assessment $104,400.00 Less Anticipated Delinquencies 5 670.00 Total Estimated Revenue $98,730.00 Plus Operating Reserve Fund Contribution 209.610.00 Total Expenditure Budget $308,340.00 Total Estimated Assessment $104,400.00 Total District EBU Count 3133 Actual Assessment per EBU -Fiscal Year 2011/12 $33.32 Maximum Allowable Assessment per EBU -Fiscal Year 201 I/12 $33.32 6 Section 3 -Method of Assessment Apportionment: A. General The 1972 Act permits the establishments of assessment districts for the purpose. of providing certain public improvements which include construction, maintenance and servicing of public lights, landscaping and appurtenant facilities. The 1972 Act further requires that the cost of these improvements be levied according to benefit rather than assessed value: "The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements." The formula used for calculating assessments in the District therefore reflects the composition of the parcels, and the improvements and services provided, to fairly apportion the costs based on benefit to each parcel. B. Assessment Methodology Equivalent Dwelling Units: To assess benefits equitably, it is necessary to relate the different types of parcel improvements to each other. The Equivalent Dwelling Unit method of apportionment uses the single-family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single family home equals one The Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU). Every other land-use is converted to EDU's based on an assessment formula that equates the property's specific development status, type of development (land-use), and size of the property, as compared to asingle-family home (SFR). The EDU method of apportioning benefit is typically seen as the most appropriate and equitable assessment methodology for calculating benefit in districts formed under the 1972 Act, as the benefit to each parcel from improvements are apportioned as a function of land-use type, size and development. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land-use types to determine each parcel's EDU. LAND-USE/EQUIVALENT DWELLING UNITS Property Type EDU Value Multiplier Commercial/Industrial 2.00 Acres Vacant 2.00 Acres Single Family Residential 1.00 Unit Multi-Family Residential 1.00 Unit 7 The following table summarizes the assessment rate for the district: Land Use Tvpe Assessment Rate Single Family $33.32/SFD C. Assessment All assessed lots or parcels within the District are listed on the assessment role, which is on file in the office of the City Clerk and the City Engineer, and hereby made a part of this Engineer's Report, by reference. The assessment roll states the net amount to be assessed upon all assessable lands within the District for Fiscal Year 2011/2012, and describes each assessable lot or parcel of land within the District. These lots and parcels are more particularly described on the County assessment Roll, which is on file in the office of the San Bernardino County Assessor and by reference is made a part of this Engineer's Report. 8 Section 4 -Annexations: Calendar Year 2010 Annexations Street Light Maintenance District No. 7 PROJECT UNITS ANNEX DATE NO ANNEXATIONS 9 Section 5 -Assessment Diagrams: ~o _m ~ N SIN ~ ~n V 'i '~ ~ ~ J ~ Q Q ~ ~, ~ J ~ ~ U ~ ~ O ~ ~ ny ~(a~a4~ ~ ~ ~ C ~ J ~' ° N ~ ~, C Q y m ~ u~ O L ~j '~ m O O /` L ._.._.._.._.. t _.._.._.. Q _; nd lS~~ ..- yy ~ ~ ~ i ny epuenn!;3 '~ 1 J ~ y., ~ ' ~ ny ~a;sayoo~{ ! n ~a sa o0 j j d ~ 4 2i ..~ ' .~ ~ 1 ny ua~{!II!W r._.._.._.._.._.._ i ny ua~!II!W i i ~ j ny uaneH ~ -- ~ j my uanaH i ny esow~aH i - ! ny esow~aH i i nt/ plaq!4oab' ~ -- j ny plaq!uoaV j ~ ~ ~''n uewa ny uewllaH i -- ,.C' ~ d II H i ~'' ~ i _ ~~ ~ ~ ny p~e~(awn lS ue!lawe~ i ,~ L SF~~: ~~~~~; r.._... .•~ ~ ~.._~~ _.._.._._. j g~e~s~En~n-c v c ~n~`x~sy~~aq~~ w ca €"~E~;•~-eR€~~ m ~~'ga~~~E~~S: iY ~~~~~opg Fll~~ ~~ florF ° e ~ ee•sfi€R~ `~ Z ~ S~ > ~ Q ~ ~ J ~ (~ C (~ s~ ~ N ~ ~ w w i O m ~. ~ m '~j y ~ _ U ~ m W ~ ~ s`/ ca a F~ ~ U nd Aaa i i • o j N .~.+ > Q i C .-.;z ~~r.. o- ~ v L Q ~ • ~. • ~^^+ ~ N I ~ ~ • • i • ~~ oa ~I~o~~na Nb`waaeM ~ a N Y ~ ~ ~ _ = 7 ; ~ ~ ~ . j ? ~ }~ ~ •~ ~~ W g i ` v ^~ ~ I o ~~ -- W~ ~ L ~ ~ Q a } _ j ° m nd lsd3 z = ~ ~ i N ~ __~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ ~ ~ •+ a~ A ~ ~ nFlt/dNbM113 • • •~} nbb'dN~ 113 nb;'d4N`dM113 Ny v• - ~s~- ~ ~1 J • ~ ~ I I / ~• ~~ ~ • • S. .~ ~- f ~ I • ( I • ~ ~ • ~ • - • ~_ ~Y • •~~ • • • ~ / ; • • •~~ _o N _ • •i • Y • ¢a ~la~~; :F~~Ba~§ EFsa ~ v Z Q 6 • • ~ . • ~ Ee ~~~~s Y : 9 '~ ;F ~~ • o Z ~ ~~~ , s: FB ~~~` -?.~ ~ N g ii°a $$~gRR~~Z6e~4 ESps ~4~ $ ~~ ~ ~ g J ~ F g E ~ FF F Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2011/2012 City of Rancho Cucamonga Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 8 (South Etiwanda) ENGINEER'S REPORT AFFIDAVIT Rancho Cucamonga Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 8 (South Etiwanda) City of Rancho Cucamonga San Bernardino County, State of California This Report describes the District and all relevant zones therein including the improvements, budgets, parcels and assessments to be levied for fiscal year 2011/2012, as they existed at the time of the passage of the Resolution of Intention. Reference is hereby made to the San Bernardino County assessor's maps for a detailed description of the lines and dimensions of parcels within the District. The undersigned respectively submits the enclosed Report as directed by the City Council. Dated this 6`h da , 2011. Approved by: -~T~Z Mark A. Steuer, City Engine II TABLE OF CONTENTS OVERVIEW .........................................................................................4 SECTION 1 -DESCRIPTION OF FACILITIES ............................................5 SECTION 2 -ESTIMATE OF COSTS AND EXPENSES ..............................6 SECTION 3 -METHOD OF ASSESSMENT APPORTIONMENT ...................7 A. GENERAL ......................................................................7 B. ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY .......................................7 C. ASSESSMENT ................................................................8 SECTION 4 -ANNEXATIONS ................................................................9 SECTION 5 -ASSESSMENT DIAGRAMS ..............................................10 Overview The FY 2011/2012 Annual Report for Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 8 (South Etiwanda) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Part 2, Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Street Lighting and Light Act of 1972). Section 1 Description of Facilities The plans and specifications for improvements maintained by the Assessment District consist of a general description of the nature, location, and the extent of the improvements proposed to be maintained, and are attached hereto. Section 2 Estimates of Cost and Expenses An estimate of the maintenance cost of the improvements, including incidental costs and expenses in connection therewith for FY 2011/2012, is set forth on the lists thereof, attached hereto. Section 3 Method of Assessment Apportionment Discuses the methodology used for calculating assessments in the District. The method reflects the composition of the parcels, and the improvements and services provided, to fairly apportion the costs based on benefit to each parcel. The assessment roll states the net amount to be assessed upon all assessable lands within the District for FY 2011/2012, and describes each assessable lot or parcel of land within the District. These lots and parcels are more particularly described on the County assessment Roll, which is on file in the office of the San Bernardino County Assessor and by reference is made a part of this Engineer's Report Section 4 Annexations List the developments, which have annexed to the Street Lighting Maintenance District within Calendar year 2010. Section 5 Assessment Diagrams Shows the boundaries of the areas to be annexed to the Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 8 and the general boundaries of the District. For details regarding the boundaries and dimensions of the respective parcels and subdivisions of land within the Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 8, refer to the San Bernardino County Assessor's maps. 4 Section 1 -Description of Facilities: Street Light Maintenance District No. 8 (SLD #8) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located on local streets in what is termed the South Etiwanda area of the City. Generally, this area encompasses the area of the City east of Etiwanda Avenue, north of Foothill Boulevard and south of Highland Avenue within the incorporated area of the City. It has been determined that the facilities in this district benefit the properties within this area of the City. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on local streets and traffic signals (or a portion thereof) on local streets within the South Etiwanda area. Typically, street lights are installed by private development as a condition of a development project's approval. Traffic signals can be installed by development or as a City capital improvement project. Historically, the installation of street lights and traffic signals has not been funded with Street Light District funds, however, this is permitted under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972. Any new street lights in areas to be maintained by the District will become part of the active work program at such time as these new areas are annexed into the District. The normal process will be the dedication of the areas to the City, at which time a sufficient non-refundable deposit will be made by the developer to the City. This deposit will provide for costs of energizing and six months of ordinary and usual maintenance, operation and servicing of the street lights in each development at the time of initial operation of the lighting system. The costs will be based on the number and type of street lights and based on Southern California Edison Company's rate for street lights. Immediately upon energization of the street lights, those street lights will become a part of the work program of the district. 5 Section 2 -Estimate of Costs and Expenses: The majority of the budgeted operating costs for SLD #8 are for electric utility charges for the street lights and traffic signals within the district. The projected costs to operate and maintain SLD #8 are as follows: District Budget Estimated 2011/12 Budget Personnel Services Regular Salaries $22,700.00 Part-time Salaries 12,70D.00 Fringe Benefits 11.130.OD Subtotal Personnel $44,530.00 Operations and Maintenance Operations and Maintenance $5,150.00 Equipment Operations and Maintenance 0.00 Contract Services 14,670.00 Utilities Telephone Utilities 0.00 Electric Utilities 66,540.00 Assessment Administration 9,390.00 General Overhead 8,980.00 Interfund Allocation 16.290.00 Subtotal Operations and Maintenance $121,020.00 Capital Expenditures Capital Proiecls 0.00 Subtotal Capital Expenditures 0.00 Total District Expenditure Budget ~ $165,550.00 Total Estimated Assessment $151,320.00 Less Anticipated Delinquencies (0.001 Total Estimated Revenue $151,320.00 Plus Operating Reserve Fund Contribution 14.230.00 Total Expenditure Budget $165,550.00 Total Estimated Assessment $151,320.00 Total District EBU Count 1707 Actual Assessment per EBU -Fiscal Year 2011/12 $77.00 Maximum Allowable Assessment er F.BU -Fiscal Year 2011/12 $77.00 6 Section 3 -Method of Assessment Apportionment: A. General The 1972 Act permits the establishments of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include construction, maintenance and servicing of public lights, landscaping and appurtenant facilities. The 1972 Act further requires that the cost of these improvements be levied according to benefit rather than assessed value: "The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements. " The formula used for calculating assessments in the District therefore reflects the composition of the parcels, and the improvements and services provided, to fairly apportion the costs based on benefit to each parcel. B. Assessment Methodology Equivalent Dwelling Units: To assess benefits equitably, it is necessary to relate the different types of parcel improvements to each other. The Equivalent Dwelling Unit method of apportionment uses the single-family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single family home equals one The Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU). Every other land-use is converted to EDU's based on an assessment formula that equates the property's specific development status, type of development (land-use), and size of the property, as compared to asingle-family home (SFR). The EDU method of apportioning benefit is typically seen as the most appropriate and equitable assessment methodology for calculating benefit in districts formed under the 1972 Act, as the benefit to each parcel from improvements are apportioned as a function of land-use type, size and development. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land-use types to determine each parcel's EDU. LAND-USE/EQUIVALENT DWELLING UNITS Property Type EDU Value Multipli Multi-Family Residential 1.00 Unit Single Family Residential 1.00 Unit Commercial/Industrial 2.00 Acre Vacant 2.00 Acre 7 The following table summarizes the assessment rate for the district: Land Use Tvpe Assessment Rate Single Family $193.75/SFD C. Assessment All assessed lots or parcels within the District are listed on the assessment role, which is on file in the office of the City Clerk and the City Engineer, and hereby made a part of this Engineer's Report, by reference. The assessment roll states the net amount to be assessed upon all assessable lands within the District for Fiscal Year 2011/2012, and describes each assessable lot or parcel of land within the District. These lots and parcels are more particularly described on the County assessment Roll, which is on file in the office of the San Bernardino County Assessor and by reference is made a part of this Engineer's Report. 8 Section 4 -Annexations: Calendar Year 2010 Annexations Street Light Maintenance District No. 8 PROJECT UNITS ANNEX DATE NO ANNEXATIONS Section 5 -Assessment Diagrams: ~o DO a~ ` ~ ~i.r _ ~ ~n V 'i ~' ~ ~ J ap O c ! Q = U ~ `~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ! ny /G~ay~ p~ r~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r :_.._.._.. ~ ~ -o ~ J ' o ~ ~ ~ N ~ ' r I ~ J ~ m +~ ~ O m ~ ~~ ~ i li Q _.. i ._.._.._.. _ i ny 3se3 in ~ i 1 ~ ~ 1 At/ epUeMll~ ~ ny epuero-g3 ~~ i ~I 1 i ~.+ ~8 ~aaa~ ~(ea i •_....._.._.._.._.._..1 1 w ny ~a~sayoo~ w i • n aa~sa o0 1 d y ~ ' ..~ ~~ ~ 1 ny ua~!II!W r._.._.._.._.._.._ i ny ua~!II!W i i i i i 1 ny uaneH ~ i ~ i ny uaneH i i _ ny esoua~aH j ! ny esowaaH ~ I ~ ny Ple4lyo~b' jn`d Ple4!yo~b' ny ueuallaH i ~•~'' i ~ ny ueuallaH ' ~r•• L ~ i i ~ ny pae~(au !n lS ue!lauae~ i i .•~•.r~7 r/ ._ ~ ~'g~ ~8 ~~~ ~ ~'~~~ ~ ~ i fi ~ i n aAOa ~g ~ '~ ~'i i ` a 9s¢a~ 'O fn ~ f0 O Q $4,°Fjes~ggz~$ ~ C m LL °p'~~~f~3a ~C ~ ~ ~~I~~s¢~~~~1; c ~ ~ _~ m i! : • is s ~ ~ I tg~~~ ~~~~ ~ T ~C ~~ ~ ~Z=BE~~~g ~a~G~aae~_~~ toa yea ~~ ~ 3 F ~~ U ~~~a~° € 6~ ~E~gP~i~'a~€a Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 8 Street Lights and Traffic Signals Improvemei FW 1 210 AND AV 1~240tFW~1~15rSOUTHrR;q,~yj~ I I ~ ~.,~~ i ~, ~~ i~• _1-- ~~50~ ~ ~a ~ Q/ C a ~ ~p~ u ~~ ~ i ~~• i GARCU PARK f~ ~- ~ ~, FOOTHILL BL II 0 0.25 0.5 1 Mile The maps, data and geographic information ("Information") available by and through the City of Rancho Cucamonga are presented as a public resource of general information, The City of Rancho Cucamonga makes nor implies no warranty, representation or guarantee as to the content, sequence, accuracy completeness or timeliness of any Information provided to you herein. The user should not rely upon the Information for any reason and is directed to independently verify any and all [nformation presented herein. i'he City of Rancho Cucamonga explicitly and without limitation disclaims any and all representations and warrantees, including, but not limited to, the implied warranties of merchantability and fitness for a particular purpose. The City of Rancho Cucamonga shall neither accept nor assume any liability, regardless of the causation for (1) any errors, omissions or inaccuracies in any information provided and~or (ii) any action or inaction occurring due to any persons reliance upon the Information available herein. • SCE Streetlights o Traffic Signal Lights SLD8 Boundary ---- City Boundary Item: L12. RDA -FIRE -CITY COUNCIL July 6, 2011 Approval of Resolutions initiating proceedings to levy annual assessments, preliminarily approve the annual levy reports, declaring fhe City Council's intention to levy annual assessments within Landscape Maintenance District Nos. 1, 3A, 36, 4-R, 5, 6-R, 7, 8, 3 and 10 for Fiscal Year 2011/92 and setting the time and place for a public hearing thereon. NO INCREASE OF ASSESSMENT RATE FOR FY 2019/12 IS PROPOSED.(Resolution No. 11- 098, Resolution No. 11-099 and Resolution No. 11-700J Revised Annual Engineer's Reports Fiscal Year 2011/2012 The Engineer's Reports were reviewed under separate cover and were not intended to be included in the City Council and Staff Agenda packet distribution. The reports are now included in the Laserfiche Agenda packet archive for reference. STAFF REPORT ADMINISTRATIPE SERVICES DEPdRTMENT P111 RANCHO Date: July 6, 2011 C,UCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager From: John R. Gillison, Assistant City Manag By: Ingrid Y. Bruce, GIS/Special Districts Manager Subject: CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF RESOLUTIONS INITIATING PROCEEDINGS TO LEVY ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS, PRELIMINARILY APPROVE THE ANNUAL LEVY REPORTS, DECLARING THE CITY COUNCIL'S INTENTION TO LEVY ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS WITHIN LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO'S 1, 3A, 3B, 4-R, 5, 6-R, 7, 8, 9 AND 10 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2011/12 AND SETTING THE TIME AND PLACE FOR A PUBLIC HEARING THEREON. NO INCREASE OF ASSESSMENT RATE FOR FY 2011/121S PROPOSED. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council approve the Resolutions initiating the proceedings to levy annual assessments, preliminarily approve the annual levy reports, declaring the City Council's intention to levy annual assessments within Landscape Maintenance District Nos. 1, 3A, 3B, 4-R, 5, 6-R, 7, 8, 9 and 10. There is no increase to the current rates in these districts proposed for Fiscal Year 2011/2012. The Engineer's Reports are on file in the City Clerk's Office. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS This year, the City will place on the County Tax Roll ten (10) Landscape Maintenance Districts (LMDs) and the assessments received for each of these Districts are utilized for the maintenance and operation of park and landscaping facilities therein. Said maintenance and operation include but is not limited to turf, ground cover, planter beds, shrubs, plants and trees, landscape lighting, irrigation systems, electrical energy for irrigation controllers, insecUdisease control, graffiti removal, hardscapes, entry signs, sound walls and all associated appurtenant facilities. The City utilizes prior year carryovers along with current year revenues to meet the districts annual expenses. It has been determined, as stated in the Landscape Maintenance Districts Fiscal Year 2011/2012 Engineer's Reports that the assessment rates remain unchanged from the previous fiscal year 2010/2011 rates. The assessment rates and districts description for each of the Landscape Maintenance Districts are as follows: Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 assessments pay for the on-going maintenance of parkways. The current assessment rate is $92.21 per single-family residence, and the multi-family is $46.11 per dwelling unit. P112 CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF RESOLUTIONS DECLARING THE CITY COUNCIL'S PAG13 2 INTENTION TO LEVY ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS ~X~ITHIN LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO'S 1, 3A, 3B, 4-R, 5, 6-R, 7, 8, 9 AND 10 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2011 / 12 AND SETTING THE TIME AND PLACE FOR A PUBLIC HEARING THEREON. JULY 6, 2011 Landscape Maintenance District No. 3A assessments pay for the on-going maintenance of parkways on Hyssop Drive. The current assessment rate is $413.74 per acre for commercial property. Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B assessments pay for the on-going maintenance of parkways within the commercial and industrial area of the City. The current assessment rate is $352.80 per acre for commercial property. Landscape Maintenance District No. 4-R assessments pay for the on-going maintenance of parkways, paseos and parks within the Terra Vista Planned Community. The current assessment rate is $380.00 per single-family residence, the condominium rate is 304.00 per dwelling unit and the multi-family rate is $266.00 per dwelling unit. The commercial rate is $1,235.00 per acre, and the vacant rate is $95.00 per acre. Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 assessments pay for the on-going maintenance of a Tot Lot located on the southwest corner of Andover Place and Bedford Drive. The current assessment rate is $113.29 per single-family residence. Landscape Maintenance District No. 6-R assessments pay for the on-going maintenance of parkways and paseos within the Caryn Planned Community. The current assessment rate is $366.00 per single-family residence Zone 1 and $274.50 per single family residence Zone 2. Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 assessments pay for the on-going maintenance of parkways and paseos within the Etiwanda Highlands Community. The current assessment rate is $307.05 per single-family residence. Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 assessments pay for the on-going maintenance of parkways in South Etiwanda. The current assessment rate is $151.45 per single-family residence. Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 assessments pay for the on-going maintenance of .parkways in South Etiwanda. The current assessment rate is $387.94 per single-family residence. Landscape Maintenance District No. 10 assessments pay for the on-going maintenance of parkways in the future University Crest Project. The current assessment rate is $616.20 per single- family residence and $1,232.40 per acre for commercial property. Attachments Resolutions Engineer's Reports . P113 RESOLUTION NO. /~- ~ `~ S RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO PROVIDE FOR THE ANNUAL LEVY AND COLLECTION OF ASSESSMENTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2011/2012 IN LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO'S. 1, 3A, 3B, 4-R, 5, 6-R, 7, 8, 9 AND 10, INCLUSIVE, AND SETTING A TIME AND PLACE FOR A PUBLIC HEARING THEREON WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has previously formed certain maintenance districts and authorized the levy of assessments therein pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972," being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California (commencing with Section 22500) (the "1972 Act") in what are known and designated as Landscape Maintenance District Nos. 1, 3A, 3B, 4-R, 5, 6-R, 7, 8, 9 and 10, inclusive (each a "District" and collectively, the "Districts"); and WHEREAS, this City Council has initiated proceedings to provide for the annual levy of assessments for Fiscal Year 2011/12, to finance the costs and expenses necessary for continued maintenance and servicing of improvements within each District; and WHEREAS, at this time, there has been presented and approved by this City Council, a separate report for each District identified by the distinctive designation of such District and entitled "Fiscal Year 2011/12 Annual Levy Report" (each, an "Annual Levy Report" and collectively, the "Annual Levy Reports") as required pursuant to Article 4 of Chapter 1 of the 1972 Act, Article XIIID of the Constitution of the State of California ("Article XIIID") and the Proposition 218 Omnibus Implementation Act (Government Code Section 53750 and following) (the "Implementation. Act") (the 1972 Act, Article XIIID and the Implementation Act are referred to collectively as the "Assessment Law"), and this City Council desires to conduct the proceedings to authorize the levy of the annual assessments within each District; and WHEREAS, the annual assessments for Fiscal Year 2011/12 proposed to be levied within each District as set forth in the applicable report do not exceed the annual assessments as previously authorized to be levied within such District and, therefore, the proposed levy of assessments for Fiscal Year 2011/2012 within such District are not deemed to be "increased" over the maximum authorized annual assessments. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, DETERMINED AND ORDERED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, as follows: SECTION 1. Recitals. The above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2. Improvements and Maintenance and Servicing Thereof. The public interest and convenience requires, and it is the intention of this City Council, to undertake proceedings for the annual levy and collection of assessments within each District for the continual maintenance and servicing of the improvements authorized to be maintained and serviced within each such District. P114 The improvements include, but are not limited to, turf, ground cover, planter beds, shrubs, plants and trees, landscape lighting, irrigation systems, electrical energy for irrigation controllers, hardscapes, entry signs, sound walls, and all associated appurtenant facilities. A description of the specific improvements to be maintained and serviced within each District is set forth in Appendix A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. "Maintenance" may include the furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operation, and servicing of any improvement, including: (a) repair, removal, or replacement of all or any part of any improvement; (b) providing for the life, growth, health, and beauty of landscaping, including cultivation, irrigation, trimming, spraying, fertilizing, or treating for disease or injury; (c) the removal of trimmings, rubbish, debris, and other solid waste; (d) the cleaning, sandblasting, and painting of walls and other improvements to remove or cover graffiti. "Service" may include the furnishing of: (a) electric current or energy, gas, or other illuminating agent for the lighting or operation of any improvements; and, (b) water for the irrigation of any landscaping, the operation of any fountains, or the maintenance of any other improvements. Reference is made to the applicable Annual Levy Report for further information regarding the improvements to be maintained and serviced for each District and the scope of such maintenance and service. SECTION 3. Annual Levy Reports. The Annual Levy Reports regarding the annual levy for each District for Fiscal Year 2011/2012 have been previously approved and directed to be filed in the Office the City Clerk. Reference is made to the applicable such report for each District for a full and detailed description of the improvements to be, maintained and serviced, the boundaries of such District and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within such District. SECTION 4. Assessment. The public interest and convenience requires, and it is the intention of this City Council to order the annual levy of assessments for each District as set forth and described in the applicable Annual Levy Report, and further it is determined to be in the best public interest and convenience to levy and collect annual assessments to pay the costs and expenses of such maintenance and service as estimated in such Annual Levy Report. SECTION 5. Boundaries of Districts. The proposed maintenance and service work as described in the Annual Levy Report for each District is, in the opinion of this City Council, of special benefit to the properties within the boundaries of such District, and this City Council makes the costs and expenses of such maintenance and service chargeable upon each such District, which District said City Council hereby declares to be the District specially benefited by such maintenance and service, and to be further assessed pursuant to the Assessment Law to pay the costs and expenses thereof. Each such District shall include each and every parcel of land within the boundaries thereof; as such District is shown on a map or maps as approved by this City Council and on file in the Office of the City Clerk, and so designated by the name of such District. SECTION 6. Public Hearing. Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held the 3rd day of August, 2011, at the hour of 7:00 o'clock p.m. or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard, in the regular meeting of the City Council, being in the Council Chambers located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California, which is the time and place fixed P115 by this City Council for the hearing of protests or objections in reference to the annual levy of assessments, to the extent of the maintenance, by any interested person and any other matters contained in this resolution. Any persons who wish to object to the proceedings for the annual levy should file a written protest with the City Clerk prior to the time sef and scheduled for said public hearing. SECTION 7. For Information Regarding Proceedings. For any and all information relating to the proceedings, protest procedure, any documentation and/or information of a procedural or technical nature, your attention is directed to the below listed person at the City: Ingrid Bruce GIS/Special Districts Manager City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 (909) 477-2700, Ext 2575 SECTION 8. Notice. The City Clerk is. hereby authorized and directed to publish, pursuant to Government Code Section 6061, a copy of this Resolution in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin, a newspaper of general circulation within said City, said publication shall be made one time and not less than ten (10) days before the date set for the Public Hearing. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this day of July, 2011. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: ATTEST: L. Dennis Michael, Mayor Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk I, Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk of the certify that the foregoing Resolution was Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, 2011. City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby duly passed, approved and adopted by the City at a regular meeting of said City Council held on Executed this , at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk P116 Appendix A Descriptions of Improvements This Appendix A contains general descriptions of the improvements to be maintained and serviced within each of the Districts. Please refer to the Annual Levy Reports for a full and complete description of the maintenance and service to be provided for each District. Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 Landscaping: Parkways (includes turf and ground cover) Median Islands (includes turf and ground cover) Paseos Street Trees Entry Monuments Community Trails Parks: (Parks within LMD No. 1 include: Bear Gulch Park, East and West Beryl Park, Old Town Park, Church Street Park, Golden Oaks Park, Heritage Community Park, Hermosa Park, Red Hill Community Park, Lions Park, Napa Park, Don Tiburcio Tapia Park and the Rancho Cucamonga Adult Sports Complex) Landscape Maintenance District No. 3A Landscaping: Parkways (includes ground cover only) Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B Landscaping: Parkways (includes turf and ground cover) Median Islands (includes turf and ground cover) Street Trees Entry Monuments Landscape Maintenance District No. 4-R Landscaping: Parkways (includes turf and ground cover) Median Islands (includes turf and ground cover) Paseos Street Trees Parks (Parks within LMD No. 4 include: Spruce Park, Mountain View Park, Ralph M. Lewis Park, Coyote Canyon Park, Milliken Park and West Greenway Park) Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 Landscaping: Tot Lot at Andover and Bedford (includes ground cover only) Landscape Maintenance District IVo. 6-R Landscaping: Parkways (includes turf and ground cover) Median Islands (includes turf and ground cover) Paseos Street Trees Community Trails A- 1 P117 Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 Landscaping: Parkways (includes turf and ground cover) Median Islands (includes turf and ground cover) Paseos Street Trees Community Trails Parks (Parks within LMD No. 7 include: Etiwanda Creek Community Park) Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 Landscaping: Parkways (includes turf and ground cover) Median Islands (includes turf and ground cover) Paseos Street Trees Community Trails Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 Landscaping: Parkways (includes turf and ground. cover) Median Islands (includes turf and ground cover) Street Trees Parks (Parks within LMD No. 9 include: South Etiwanda Park) Landscape Maintenance District No. 10 Landscaping: Parkways (includes turf and ground cover) Median Islands (includes turf and grourid cover) Street Trees Community Trails Parks (Parks within LMD No. 10 include: Day Creek Park) A-2 P118 RESOLUTION NO. ~/~' ~~~ RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE PREPARATION OF ANNUAL LEVY REPORTS PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE ASSESSMENT LAW FOR PROCEEDINGS FOR THE ANNUAL ASSESSMENT LEVY WITHIN LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO'S. 1, 3A, 3B, 4-R, 5, 6-R, 7, 8, 9 AND 10, INCLUSIVE, FOR FISCAL YEAR 2011/12 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, previously undertaken proceedings to form and has formed certain maintenance districts pursuant to pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California (commencing with Section 22500) (the "1972 Act"), known and designated as Landscape Maintenance District Nos. 1, 3A, 3B, 4-R, 5, 6-R, 7, 8, 9 and 10, inclusive (each, a "District" and collectively, the "Districts"); and WHEREAS, at this time the City Council desires to initiate proceedings pursuant to Chapter 3 of the 1972 Act to provide for the annual levy of assessments for the next ensuing fiscal year to provide for the annual costs for maintenance and servicing of improvements within the Districts; and WHEREAS, the proceedings for the annual levy of assessments shall relate to the fiscal year commencing July 1, 2011, and ending June 30, 2012 ("Fiscal Year 2011 /12"). NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, DETERMINED AND ORDERED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, as follows: SECTION 1. Recitals. The above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2. New Improvements or Substantial Changes in Existing Improvements. No new improvements are proposed to be added to the improvements to be maintained or serviced and no substantial changes in the existing improvements are proposed to be made for Fiscal Year 2011/12. SECTION 3. Annual Levy Reports. The City Engineer is hereby ordered to prepare and file with this City Council an Annual Levy Report for each District relating to such annual assessment and levy in such District in accordance with the provisions of 1972 Act, Article XIIID of the Constitution of the State of California ("Article XIIID") and the Proposition 218 Omnibus Implementation Act (Government Code Section 53750 and following) (the "Implementation Act") (the 1972 Act, Article XIIID and the Implementation Act are referred to collectively as the "Assessment Law"). SECTION 4. Filing of the Annual Levy Reports. Upon completion, the Annual Levy Report for each District shall be filed with the City Clerk, who shall then submit the same to this City Council for its consideration pursuant to the Assessment Law. P119 PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this day of July, 2011. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: ATTEST: Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk L. Dennis Michael, Mayor I, Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of said City Council held on 2011. Executed this at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk P120 RESOLUTION NO. ~~~1 L'~~ RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, PRELIMINARILY APPROVING THE ANNUAL LEVY REPORTS FOR THE ANNUAL LEVY OF ASSESSMENTS WITHIN LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 3A, 3B, 4-R, 5, 6-R, 7, 8, 9 AND 10, INCLUSIVE, FOR FISCAL YEAR 2011/12 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, pursuant to the provisions of Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California (the "1972 Act"), Article XIIID of the Constitution of the State of California:("Article XIIID") and the Proposition 218 Omnibus Implementation Act (Government Code Section 53750 and following) (the "Implementation Act") (the 1972 Act, Article XIIID and the Implementation Act are referred to collectively as the "Assessment Law"), did, by previous Resolution, order the preparation of a separate report for the annual levy of assessments for Fiscal Year 2011/2012 (each, an "Annual Levy Report") in certain maintenance assessment districts known and designated as Landscape Maintenance District Nos. 1, 3A, 3B, 4-R, 5, 6-R, 7, 8, 9 and 10, inclusive (each, a "District" and collectively, the "Districts"); and WHEREAS, there has now been presented to this City Council a separate Annual Levy Report for each District as required by the Assessment Law and as previously directed by Resolution; and WHEREAS, this City Council has now examined and reviewed each Annual Levy Report as presented, and is satisfied. with each and all of the items and documents as set forth in each such report,. and is satisfied that the assessments on a preliminary basis, have been spread within each District in accordance with the special beriefits received from the improvements to be maintained and serviced, as set forth in the applicable Annual Levy Report. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, DETERMINED AND ORDERED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, as follows: SECTION 1. Recitals. The above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2. Annual Levy Reports. The Annual Levy Report for each District as presented, consisting of the following: A. Plans and specifications describing the general nature, location and extent of the improvements to be maintained and serviced and the extent of such maintenance; B. An estimate of the cost of the maintenance of the improvements for the District for Fiscal Year 2011/12; C. A diagram for such District, showing the area and properties proposed to be assessed; and P121 D. An annual assessment for Fiscal Year 2011/2012 of the estimated costs of the maintenance and servicing of those improvements to be maintained and serviced during such Fiscal Year, assessing the net amount upon all assessable lots and/or parcels within such District in proportion to the special benefits received is hereby approved on a preliminary basis and is ordered to be filed in the Office of the City Clerk as a permanent record and to remain open for public inspection. SECTION 3. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Resolution, and the minutes of this meeting shall so reflect the presentation of the Annual Levy Reports. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this day of July 2011. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: ATTEST: L. Dennis Michael, Mayor Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk I, Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk of the certify that the foregoing Resolution was Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, . 2011. City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby duly passed, approved and adopted by the City at a regular meeting of said City Council held on Executed this , at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk Item: L12. RDA -FIRE -CITY COUNCIL July 6, 2011 Approval of Resolutions initiating proceedings to levy annual assessments, preliminarily approve the annual levy reports, declaring the City Council's intention to levy annual assessments within Landscape Maintenance District Nos. 9, 3A, 38, 4-R, 5, 6-R, 7, 8, 9 and 90 for Fiscal Year 2019/92 and setting the time and place for a public hearing thereon. NO INCREASE OF ASSESSMENT RATE FOR FY 2011/92 !S PROPOSED. jResolution No. 91- 098, Resolution No. 11-099 and Resolution No. 99-100J Revised Annual Engineer's Reports Fiscal Year 2011/2012 The Engineer's Reports were reviewed under separate cover and were not intended to be included in the City Council and Staff Agenda packet distribution. The reports are now included in the Laserfiche Agenda packet archive for reference. Revised Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2011/2012 City of Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 (General City) CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (GENERAL CITY) 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Phone: 909.477.2740 Fax: 909.477.2741 CITY COUNCIL L. Dennis Michael, Mayor Sam Spagnolo, Mayor Pro Tem William Alexander, Council Member Chuck Buquet, Council Member Diane Williams, Council Member CITY STAFF John R. Gillison, Assistant City Manager Linda D. Daniels, Deputy City Manager William Wittkopf, Public Works Director Ingrid Y. Bruce, GIS/Special Districts Manager Christopher Bopko, Management Analyst III TABLE OF CONTENTS ENGINEER'S LETTER 1 INTRODUCTION 3 Reason for Assessment .............................................................................................3 Process for Annual Assessment .................................................................................3 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS 5 Description of the Boundaries of the District ...............................................................5 Description of Improvements and Services ................................................................5 Map of Improvements ...............................................................................................16 ESTIMATE OF COSTS 17 District Budget ..........................................................................................................17 Definitions of Budget Items .......................................................................................18 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT 20 General ............................................................................. ........................................20 Special Benefit ................................................................. ........................................20 General Benefit ................................................................ ........................................21 Method of Assessment Spread ........................................ ........................................21 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM ASSESSMENT ROLL 23 24 Assessment Roll .......................................................................................................24 Annexations ..............................................................................................................24 ENGINEER'S LETTER WHEREAS, on ,the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 (the "1972 Act") adopted its Resolution No. _, a Resolution Initiating Proceedings for the Levy of Annual Assessments for Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 (General City) (the "District"); and WHEREAS, the Resolution Initiating Proceedings directed staff to prepare and file an Engineer's Report for Fiscal Year 2011/12 pursuant to the requirements of the 1972 Act. The Engineer's Report presents the plans and specifications describing the general nature, location and extent of the improvements to be maintained, an estimate of the costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements for the District for the referenced fiscal year, a diagram for the District, showing the area and properties proposed to be assessed, and an assessment of the estimated costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing the improvements, assessing the net amount upon all assessable lots and/or parcels within the District in proportion to the special benefit received; and NOW THEREFORE, the following assessment is proposed to be authorized in order to pay the estimated costs of maintenance, operation and servicing of the improvements to be paid by the assessable real property within the boundaries of the District in proportion to the special benefit received. The following table summarizes the proposed assessment. SUMMARY OF ASSESSMENT Fiscal Year 2011/12 Total Estimated Assessment $1,189,923.88 Less Anticipated Delinquencies t70 443.88) Total Estimated Revenue $1,119,460.00 Plus Reserve Fund Contribution 329.360.00 Total Expenditure Budget $1,448,840.00 Total District EBU Count 11,843.00 Actual Assessment per EBU $92.21 Maximum Allowable Assessment per EBU $92.21 In making the assessments contained herein pursuant to the 1972 Act: I have identified all parcels which will have a special benefit conferred upon them from the improvements described in the Special Benefit Section of this Engineer's Report (the "Specially Benefited Parcels"). For particulars as to the identification of said parcels, reference is made to the Assessment Diagram, a copy of which is included in this Engineer's Report. 2. I have evaluated the costs and expenses of the improvements upon the Specially Benefited Parcels. In making such evaluation: Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2011/12 a. The proportionate special benefit derived by each Specially Benefited Parcel from the improvements was determined in relationship to the entirety of the maintenance costs of the improvements; b. No assessment has been imposed on any Specially Benefited Parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on such parcel from the improvements; and c. Any general benefits from the improvements have been separated from the special benefits and only special benefits have been assessed. I, the undersigned, respectfully submit the enclosed Engineer's Report and, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, the Engineer's Report, Assessments, and the Assessment Diagram herein have been prepared and computed in accordance with the order of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Assessment Law. Mark A. Steuer, City Engineer Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2011/12 INTRODUCTION Reason for Assessment Approval of the assessment covered by this Engineer's Report will generate the revenue necessary to: Provide for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements described in this Engineer's Report. Maintenance may include but is not limited to, all of the following: the repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement, providing for the life, growth, health and beauty of the landscaping, including cultivation, irrigation, trimming, spraying, fertilizing or treating for disease or injury, the removal of trimming, rubbish, debris and other solid waste, the maintenance, repair and replacement as necessary of all irrigation systems and the removal of graffiti from walls immediately adjacent to the cultivated areas. Servicing means the furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operating and servicing of any improvement. Servicing shall also include vehicle, equipment, capital improvements and administrative costs associated with the annual administration and operation of the District. Process for Annual Assessment The City cannot levy and collect annual assessments within the District without complying with the procedures specified in the 1972 Act. On an annual basis, an Engineer's Report must be prepared which contains a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the district. The City Council must also adopt a resolution of intention which: Declares the intention of the City Council to levy and collect assessments within the assessment district for the fiscal year stated therein. • Generally describes the existing and proposed improvements and any substantial changes proposed to be made in existing improvements. • Refers to the assessment district by its distinctive designation and indicate the general location of the district. • Refers to the report of the engineer, on file with the clerk, for a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the district. • Gives notice of the time and place for public hearing by the City Council on the levy of the proposed assessment. • States whether the assessment is proposed to increase from the previous year. If the assessments are to be levied in the same or lesser amounts than the maximum assessment amount approved, the clerk shall give notice by causing the resolution of intention to be published. Any interested person may, prior to the conclusion of the public hearing, file a written protest which shall state all grounds of objection. The protest shall contain a description sufficient to identify the property owned by the property owner filing the protest. During the course or upon conclusion of the hearing, the City Council may order changes in any of the matters provided in the report, including changes in the improvements, any zones within the assessment district, and the proposed diagram or the proposed assessment. The City Council, upon conclusion of the public hearing must then adopt a resolution confirming the diagram and assessment, either as originally proposed or as changed by it. The adoption of the resolution shall constitute the levy of an assessment for the fiscal year referred to in the assessment. Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2011/12 If the assessment to be levied exceeds the maximum assessment amount previously approved, the City must comply with the procedures specified in Article XIII D and Proposition 218. The voters in the State of California in November 1996 added Article XIII D to the California Constitution imposing, among other requirements, the necessity for the City to conduct an assessment ballot procedure to enable the owners of each property on which assessments are proposed to be enacted or increased, the opportunity to express their support for, or opposition to the proposed assessment or increase in such assessment. The basic steps of the assessment ballot procedure are outlined below. The City must prepare a Notice of Public Hearing ("Notice'), which describes, along with other mandated information, the reason for the proposed assessments, and to provide a date and time of a public hearing to be held on the matter. The City must also prepare an assessment ballot, which clearly gives the property owner the ability to sign and mark their assessment ballot either in favor of, or in opposition to the proposed assessment. The Notice and assessment ballot are mailed to each affected property owner within the District a minimum of 45 days prior to the public hearing date as shown in the Notice. The City may also hold community meetings with the property owners to discuss the issues facing the District and to answer property owner questions directly. After the Notice and assessment ballot are mailed, property owners are given until the close of the public hearing, stated in the Notice, to return their signed and marked assessment ballot. During the public hearing, property owners are given the opportunity to address the City Council and ask questions or voice their concerns. At the public hearing, the returned assessment ballots received prior to the close of the public hearing are tabulated, weighted by the proposed assessment amount on each property and the results are announced by the City Council. Article XIII D provides that if, as a result of the assessment ballot proceeding, a majority protest is found to exist, the City Council shall not have the authority to levy and collect the assessments as proposed. A majority protest exists if the assessments represented by ballots submitted in opposition exceed those submitted in favor of the assessment. All returned ballots are tabulated and weighted according to the financial obligation of each particular parcel. If there is no majority protest as described above, the City Council may approve the proposed assessments. If there is a majority protest, as described above, the City will not levy and collect any assessments. Landscape Maintenance District No. 1-City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2011/12 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS The District provides for the administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing of various improvements located within the public right-of-way and dedicated easements within the boundaries of the District. tion of the Boundaries of the District The District is located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California. The boundaries of the District are generally described as that area of the City which is not located within the City's planned development communities. The District is made up of various landscaped sites throughout the City. As such, the parcels within the District do not represent a distinct district area as do the other LMDs within the City. Typically parcels have been annexed to the District as they have developed. Reference is also made to the Assessment Diagram included in this Report Description of Improvements and Services The improvements are the maintenance and servicing of landscaping sites and appurtenant facilities throughout the District. The various landscaping sites that are maintained consist of parkways, median islands; street trees, paseos and community trails located within street right-of-ways and dedicated public easements which are within the boundaries of the District. The landscaping maintenance includes, but is not limited to, shrubs, turf, tree trimming in irrigated City parkways and paseos, weed and pest control, landscape irrigation systems and testing, trash, debris and graffiti removal, and associated appurtenant facilities. Services include personnel, materials, contracting services, utilities, and all necessary costs associated with the maintenance, replacement and repair required to keep the improvements in a healthy, vigorous and satisfactory condition. In addition, it is the City's intention to continue to use cost effective materials, including the future ability to replace landscaping with drought resistant or low water use plants, in order to lower expenses of the District. The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows: Parks: Bear Gulch Park, East and West Beryl park, Old Town Park, Church Street Park, Golden Oaks Park, Hermosa Park, Lions Park, Napa Park, Don TiburcioTapia Park. Site # Descriptive Location A-1 The north and south side of Wilson from Hellman to Amethyst. Ground Cover area: 22,982 square feet Hardscape area: 5,694 square feet A-2 The east side of Hellman from 326 feet south of Pepperidge to 73 feet north of Pepperidge. Ground Cover area: 5,810 square feet Hardscape area: 1,600 square feet A-3 The south side of 19th Street from 62 feet east of Mayberry to 173 feet east of Mayberry. Ground Cover area: 1,680 square feet Hardscape area: 440 square feet A-4 The south side of Wilson from Amethyst to Archibald; the planters and cutouts on the west side of Archibald from Wilson to 105 feet south of Cottonwood. Ground Cover area: 5,625 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2011/12 A-5 The north and south side of Diamond Court from Klusman to Diamond Ave Ground Cover area: 3,143 square feet Hardscape area: 1,864 square feet A-6 The parkway on the n orth side of Wilson from 348 feet east of Morning Canyon to Alder Ridge. Ground Cover area: 5,700 square feet Hardscape area: 4,760 square feet A-7 The cutouts and vines on the south side of Wilson from the Alta Loma Channel to 240 feet east of Zapata. Ground Cover area: 911 square feet A-8 The east side of Broken Star from 80' south of Highland to Highland; the north side of Highland from Amethyst to Broken Star including wood chip area north of sidewalk, the south side of Highland from Broken Star to Amethyst; the west side of Amethyst from 140 feet south of Highland to 265 feet south of Highland. Ground Cover area: 6,545 square feet Hardscape area: 2,554 square feet Mulchscape area: 14,005 square feet A-9 The south side of Highland from Hellman to Broken Star. Ground Cover area: 7,865 square feet A-10 The south side of 19th from 170 feet west of Pilgrim to 167 feet east of Pilgrim. Ground Cover area: 1,808 square feet Hardscape area: 1,084 square feet A-11 The east side of Amethyst from Lemon to 230 feet north of Apricot Ground Cover area: 2,115 square feet Hardscape area: 3,438 square feet A-12 The west side of Sapphire from 710 feet north of Hillside to Hillside. Ground Cover area: 4,500 square feet A-13 The south side of Victoria from 110 feet west of London to Ramona. Ground Cover area: 2,705 square feet Hardscape area: 3,480 square feet A-14 The west side of Archibald from 273 feet north of La Gloria to Lemon; the La Gloria median from Archibald to Jadeite; the north and south side of La Gloria from Archibald to 53 feet east of Jadeite; the north side of Lemon from Archibald to 55 feet east of Klusman. Ground Cover area: 12,880 square feet Hardscape area: 12,030 square feet A-15 The planters and cutouts on the east side of Archibald from 610 feet south of Cottonwood to Wilson; the south side of Wilson from Archibald to Alta Loma Channel. Ground Cover area: 2,110 square feet A-16 The cutouts and planters on the east side of Archibald from Banyan to 190 feet north of Sunflower. Ground Cover area: 1,580 square feet A-17 The cutouts and planters on the west side of Archibald from 225 feet south of Wilson to Banyan. Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2011/12 Ground Cover area: 2,362 square feet A-18 The cutouts and planters on the north side of Banyan from Jadeite to 410 feet west of Jadeite. Ground Cover area: 216 square feet A-19 The cutouts and planters on the east side of Amethyst from 192 feet south of Sunflower to Manzanita. Ground Cover area: 4,325 square feet A-20 The west side of Archibald from 210 feet north of La Colina to 230 feet south of Almond; the south side of La Colina from Archibald to Jadeite. Ground Cover area: 17,120 square feet A-21 The planter adjacent to the equestrian trail from Riverwood to Raspberry north of the County flood retention basin that is west of Chaffey College. Ground Cover area: 22,832 square feet A-22 The west side of Haven from Carrari to Vista Grove. Ground Cover area: 4,572 square feet A-23 The west side of Haven from 434 feet north of Manzanita to 258 feet south of Manzanita. Ground Cover area: 48,390 square feet Turt area: 5,868 square feet Hardscape area: 4,581 square feet A-24 The south side of 19th from 286 feet east of Amethyst to 166 feet west of Klusman. Ground Cover area: 5,904 square feet Hardscape area: 2,938 square feet A-25 The equestrian trail and planters on the east side of Hermosa from 421 feet south of Whispering Forest to Sun Valley. Ground Cover area: 17,529 square feet A-26 The west side of Haven from 630 feet north of Wilson to Wilson; the parkway on the north side of Wilson from Haven to Mayberry; the parkway on the east side of Mayberry from Wilson to 382 feet north of Poplar, and the east and west side of Cartilla from Wilson to Poplar. Ground Cover area: 10,243 square feet Mulchscape area: 25,297 square feet A-27 The north side of 19th from Mayberry to 93 feet east of Castle Gate. Ground Cover area: 5,145 square feet Hardscape area: 2,870 square feet A-28 The east side of Hermosa from 360 feet south of Manzanita to Manzanita, and the south side of Manzanita from Hermosa to Raspberry. Ground Cover area: 7,421 square feet Hardscape area: 4,712 square feet A-29 The south side of Wilson from 240 feet west of Timbermist to Hermosa; the west side of Hermosa from Wilson to 213 feet south of Oak Grove. Ground Cover area: 11,184 square feet A-30 The equestrian trail and plant material from the curb to the tract wall on the west side of Hermosa from 118 feet south of Hillside to 160 feet south of Waterford. Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2011/12 Ground Cover area: 12,132 square feet A-31 The south side of Lemo n from London to Calle Hermosa. Ground Cover area: 4,404 square feet Hardscape area: 1,800 square feet A-32 The north side of Lemon from the Alta Loma Channel to London; the east side of London from Lemon to Cypress. Ground Cover area: 4,463 square feet Hardscape area: 3,375 square feet A-33 The parkway on the eas t side of London from 158 feet north of Banyan to 310 feet north of Banyan. Ground Cover area: 1,029 square feet Hardscape area: 1,160 square feet A-34 The south side of Alta Loma from Mayberry to Revere. Ground Cover area: 2,772 square feet Note: 1,512 square feet of ground cover deleted from this site on 7-00. A-35 The west side of Hermosa from Lemon to 125 feet north of Highland, the parkway on the south side of Lemon from 621 feet west of Hermosa to Hermosa. Ground Cover area: 10,494 square feet Hardscape area: 9,207 square feet Mulchscape area: 2,370 square feet A-36 The south side of Lemon from 385 feet west of Mayberry to Cartilla. Ground Cover area: 4,850 square feet Hardscape area: 4,915 square feet A-37 The south side of Hillside north and south of the equestrian trail from Beryl to 203 feet east of Eastwood. Ground Cover area: 4,900 square feet A-38 The median in the 9200 block of Monte Vista Ground Cover area: 500 square feet Hardscape area: 1,800 square feet A-39 The south side of Almond from Henry to Sapphire; the west side of Sapphire from Almond to 255 feet south of Bella Vista. Ground Cover area: 6,926 square feet A-40 The parkway on the east side of Jasper from Hunter to Highland; the parkway on the south side of Highland from Jasper to Carnelian; the west side of Carnelian from Highland to 210 feet south of Highland. Ground Cover area: 14,858 square feet Hardscape area: 6,040 square feet A-41 The west side of Sapphire from 236 feet north of Thoroughbred to Banyan. Ground Cover area: 1,784 square feet Hardscape area: 812 square feet A-42 The parkway on the west side of Beryl from 132 feet north of Sunflower to 23 feet north of Sunflower; and from Sunflower to Banyan. Ground Cover area: 4,735 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2011/12 Hardscape area: 5,772 square feet A-43 The north side of Base Line from Topaz to the Cucamonga Creek Channel. Ground Cover area: 4,563 square feet Hardscape area: 1,890 square feet A-44 The cutouts on the west side of Sapphire from Banyan to Marble. Ground Cover area: 7,300 square feet A-45 The mainline for this site was connected to A-46 9-8-99. A-46 The south side of Banyan from North star to Zircon. Ground Cover area: 7,448 square feet Hardscape area: 7,890 square feet A-47 The cutouts and vines on the north side of Banyan from 180 feet east of Zircon to 186 feet west of Vineyard. Ground Cover area: 1,300 square feet A-48 The parkway on the west side of Beryl from 452 feet north of Cielito; 158 feet south of Cielito and the easement between 9063 and 9073 Cielito from Cielito to 170 feet south of Cielito. Ground Cover area: 6,916 square feet Hardscape area: 2,440 square feet A-49 The east side of Carnelian from 662 feet south of Banyan to Banyan; the south side of Banyan from Carnelian to Northstar. Ground Cover area: 5,906 square feet Hardscape area: 6,972 square feet A-50 The north side of Almond from Sapphire to Crest View; the east and west side of Skyline from Almond to 595 feet north of Almond. Ground Cover area: 17,600 square feet Hardscape area: 8,680 square feet A-51 The planter adjacent to the equestrian trail; from Haven to Riverwood, north of County flood retention basin, west of Chaffey College. The west side of Haven from 400 feet north of Amber to 270 feet south of Amber. Ground Cover area: 37,977 square feet Hardscape area: 5,458 square feet A-52 The east side of Riverwood, from 188 feet south of Charwood to 193 feet north of Charwood. Ground Cover area: 2,750 square feet Hardscape area: 1,698 square feet A-53 The west side of Jasper from Hunter to Highland. The south side of Highland from Jasper to 308 feet west of Sard. The east and westside of Sard from Highland to Hunter. Ground Cover area: 7,445 square feet Hardscape area: 4,740 square feet A-54 The west side of Beryl from 233 feet north of Mignonette to Mignonette. Ground Cover area: 2,637 square feet Hardscape area: 932 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2011/12 A-55 The north side of 19'" from Cartilla to Mayberry. The east side of Mayberry from 19'" to Heather. Ground Cover area: 8,410 square feet Hardscape area: 5,060 square feet A-56 The east side of Beryl from 410 feet north of Wilson to Wilson The north side of Wilson from Beryl to 731 feet west of Buckthorn. The south side of Wilson from Buckthorn to Beryl. Ground Cover area: 19,708 square feet Hardscape area: 5,436 square feet A-57 The east side of Hermosa From 115 north of Coca To 451 feet north of Coca. The trail north of water retention basin from Hermosa to 619 feet east of Hermosa. Ground Cover area: 9,406 square feet Hardscape area: 6,794 square feet A-58 The west side of Haven from 510 feet south of Victoria to 1005 feet south of Victoria. Ground Cover area: 7,301 square feet Hardscape area: 4,790 square feet A-59 The east side of Archibald from 820 feet south of Lemon to 448 feet south of Lemon and continues from 275 feet south of Lemon to 185 feet south of Lemon. Ground Cover area: 4,777 square feet Hardscape area: 5,041 square feet A-60 The south side of Lemon from 290 feet east of Archibald to London. The West side of London from Lemon to Orange. Ground Cover area: 2,569 square feet Hardscape area: 4,122 square feet A-61 The north side of Carrari from Archibald to London. Ground Cover area: 25,152 square feet Hardscape area: 1,698 square feet A-62 The east side of Archibald from Carrari to 505 feet north of Meadowood Ground Cover area: 8,626 square feet Hardscape area: 1,824 square feet A-63 The south side of Almond street from Carriage to Almond Ground Cover area: 3,342 square feet Hardscape area: 3,600 square feet A-64 The east side of Beryl from Cottonwood to Wilson. The south side of Wilson from Beryl to 437 feet east of Beryl. The north side of Wilson from Cousins to 474 feet east of Cousins. Ground Cover area: 11,973 square feet Hardscape area: 9,949 square feet A-65 The east side of Archibald from LaGloria to 328 feet north of LaGloria. Ground Cover area: 2,279 square feet Hardscape area: 2,411 square feet A-66 The east side of Hermosa from Waterford to 500 feet north of Waterford. Ground Cover area: 4,695 square feet Hardscape area: 5,947 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 10 Fiscal Year 2011/12 A-67 The south side of 19`" from 220 feet east of Sapphire to Via Serena. Ground Cover area: 3,208 Square feet Hardscape area: 4,158 square feet A-68 The west side of Haven from Hillside to 783 feet south of Hillside. Ground cover area: 3,492 square feet A-69 The north side of Hillside from 27 feet west of Mayberry to 191 feet west of Mayberry Ground Cover area: 1,002 square feet Hardscape area: 1,605 square feet A-70 The south side of 19'" from 365 feet west of Amethyst to Amethyst. The west side of Amethyst from 19'" to Hedges. Ground Cover area: 6,435 square feet Hardscape area: 7,015 square feet A-71 The west side of Arch ibald from Hillside to Wilson Avenue. The north side of Wilson, south of the trail fence area from Archibald to 467 feet west of Archibald. Ground Cover area: 9,265 square feet Hardscape area: 2,609 square feet A-72 The south side of Banyan from 420 feet west of Archibald to Archibald. The west side of Archibald from Banyan to 389 feet south of Banyan. Ground cover area: 10,270 square feet Hardscape area: 6,673 square feet A-73 The west side of Beryl from 300 feet north of San Simeon Drive to 130 feet north of San Simeon Drive. Ground Cover area: 1,200 square feet Hardscape area: 600 square feet A-74 The south side of Highland Ave. from Beryl St. to Hellman Ave. Ground cover area: 11,603 square feet A-75 The south side of Highland Ave. from Amethyst St. to 612 feet east of Archibald Ave. Ground cover area: 106,409 square feet Hardscape area: 60,608 square feet A-76 The west side of Archibald from 635 feet north of Hillside to Hillside. The north side of Hillside from Archibald to 770 feet west of Archibald. Ground cover area: 8,859 square feet Hardscape area: 1,389 square feet A-77 The east side of Carnelian from Brilliant Ln. to Wilson including the irrigation cut-outs along trail. The south side of Wilson from Carnelian to 745 feet east of Arabian Dr. The irrigation cut-outs on the north side of Wilson from Carnelian to 775 feet east of Arabian Dr. Ground cover area: 5,101 square feet Hardscape area: 11,322 square feet B-1 The median on Blue Gum from Etiwanda to Blue Gum Court. Ground Cover area: 5,100 square feet B-2 The north side of 19th from Highland to Palm; the west and east side of Alameda from 19th to Ring; the east side of Palm from 19th to Ring. Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 11 Fiscal Year 2011/12 Ground Cover area: 47,397 square feet Hardscape area: 26,285 square feet B-3 The paseo from Sutter Ct. to Deer Creek Channel. Ground Cover area: 294 square feet Hardscape area: 400 square feet B-4 The north side of Banyan from Deer Creek Channel to 355 feet west of Fredericksburg. Ground Cover area: 9,200 square feet Hardscape area: 3,834 square feet B-5 The north side of Lemon from Semillion to 188 feet west of Terracing. Ground Cover area: 14,472 square feet Hardscape area: 3,894 square feet B-6 The north side of Lemon from Barsac to Semillion. Ground Cover area: 15,784 square feet Hardscape area: 3,780 square feet B-7 The south side of Banyan from Cabernet to 414 feet east of Cabernet. Ground Cover area: 18,814 square feet B-8 The south side of Banyan from Callaway to Muscat. Ground Cover area: 10,505 square feet B-9 The east side of Haven from Banyan to 240 feet north of Banyan; the north side of Banyan from Haven to Merlot. Ground Cover area: 24,975 square feet Hardscape area: 1,356 square feet B-10 The east side of Haven from 400 feet south of Banyan to Banyan; the south side of Banyan from Haven to Callaway. Ground Cover area: 14,548 square feet Hardscape area: 6,348 square feet B-11 The south side of Banyan from Muscat to Cabernet. Ground Cover area: 33,282 square feet B-12 The north side of Lemon from Barsac to 135 feet east of Valinda. Ground Cover area: 13,464 square feet Hardscape area: 4,098 square feet B-13 The south side of 19th from Inyo to 585 feet east of San Benito; the parkways on the east and west side of San Benito from 19th to San Mateo; the east side of Inyo from 19th to paseo south of 19th and the paseo running east from Inyo to Sonora. Ground Cover area: 17,563 square feet Turf area: 3,387 square feet Hardscape area: 14,192 square feet B-14 The paseo from San Benito and Sonora to the Deer Creek Channel Ground Cover area: 2,000 square feet Hardscape area: 540 square feet B-15 The paseo from Stanislaus and Lavine to the Deer Creek Channel. Ground Cover area: 1,040 square feet Hardscape area: 428 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 12 Fiscal Year 2011/12 B-16 The paseo from Inyo to Mendocino. Ground Cover area: 225 square feet Hardscape area: 184 square feet B-17 The paseo from Yuba Ct. to Deer Creek Channel. Ground Cover area: 918 square feet Hardscape area: 420 square feet B-18 The south side of Wilson from 377 feet west of Canistel to 1032 feet east of Canistel. Ground Cover area: 6,762 square feet Hardscape area: 8,454 square feet B-19 The east side of Haven from the Southern Pacific Railroad to 341 feet south of Victoria. Ground Cover area: 6,415 square feet Hardscape area: 8,865 square feet B-20 The east side of Haven from 341 feet south of Victoria to Victoria; the south side of Victoria from Haven to 237 feet east of Mango. Ground Cover area: 16,900 square feet Hardscape area: 8,767 square feet B-21 The south side of 19th from Valinda to Inyo. Ground Cover area: 3,900 square feet Hardscape area: 3,700 square feet B-22 The south side of Lemon south of the sidewalk from 188 feet west of Terracina to 284 feet north of Marbella. The parkway on the south side of Lemon from 188 feet west of Terracina to 517 feet north of Marbella. The turt in the parkway at the end of the cul-de- sac on Sonterra Court. The parkway on the north side Lemon from 188 feet west of Terracina to 526 feet south of Terracina. The northside of Lemon north of the sidewalk from 188 feet west of Terracina to 562 feet south of Terracina. The turf in the parkway at the end of the cul-de-sac at Serena Street. Ground Cover area: 17,688 square feet Turt Area: 6,390 square feet Hardscape area: 4,928 square feet B-23 The parkway on the east side of Lemon from 129 feet south of Marbella to 526 feet south of Terracina. The slope On the east side of Lemon east of the sidewalk from 129 feet south of Marbella to 562 feet south of Terracina. The west side of Lemon west of the sidewalk from 284 feet north of Marbella to 129 feet south of Marbella. The parkway on the west side of Lemon from 517 feet north of Marbella to 129 feet south of Marbella. Ground Cover area: 22,531 square feet Hardscape area: 4,468 square feet Note: There was 11,844 square feet of ground cover deleted from this site 7-1-00. B-24 The south side of Highland from 327 feet west Deer Creek Channel to Deer Creek Channel. The paseo from Los Osos to Deer Creek Channel. Ground Cover area: 4,946 square feet Hardscape area: 2,099 square feet B-25 The south side of Banyan from 152 feet west of Cantabria to 930 feet east of Cantabria. Ground Cover area: 16,693 square feet. B-26 The north side of Wilson from 590 feet west of High Meadow Place to 187 feet east of High Meadow Place. Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 13 Fiscal Year 2011/12 Ground Cover area: 4,628 Square feet Hardscape area: 390 square feet B-27 The east side of Haven from 467 feet north of 19th St. to 650 feet north of 19th St. Ground cover area: 3,483 square feet Hardscape area: 6,235 square feet C-1 The north side of 26th from Andover to Hermosa; the east side of Hermosa from 26th to 331 feet north of Concord. Ground Cover area: 12,804 squarefeet Turf area: 9,423 square feet Hardscape area: 5,532 square feet C-2 The entry monument on the north east and northwest corners of 4th and Archibald. Ground Cover area: 5,860 square feet Turf area: 5,546 square feet Hardscape area: 1,842 square feet C-3 The south side of Base Line from Ramona to 128 feet east of Cambridge. Ground Cover area: 17,262 square feet Hardscape area: 4,865 square feet C-4 The south side of Base Line from 440 feet west of Ramona to Ramona Ground Cover area: 6,198 squarefeet Hardscape area: 2,200 square feet C-5 The south side of Base Line from 340 feet west of Center to 103 feet east of Center. Ground Cover area: 8,850 square feet Hardscape area: 2,215 square feet C-6 The south side of Base Line from Ivy to 105 feet west of Marine. Ground Cover area: 8,080 squarefeet Hardscape area: 2,475 square feet C-7 The parkway on the north side of Church from 142 feet east of Teak to 230 feet west of Teak. Ground Cover area: 1,813 squarefeet Hardscape area: 1,650 squarefeet C-8 The west side of Herm osa from 524 feet north of Palo Alto to 142 feet south of Palo Alto. Ground Cover area: 2,650 square feet Hardscape area: 3,996 square feet C-9 The parkway on the west side of Hermosa from 163 feet north of Ironwood to 145 feet south of Ironwood. Ground Cover area: 1,500 square feet Hardscape area: 1,848 squarefeet C-10 The entry monument parkway on the south side of Base Line from the western city limit to Alta Cuesta. Ground Cover area: 9,756 square feet Hardscape area: 4,380 squarefeet C-11 The parkway on the east side of Beryl from Alder to 135 feet north of Culpepper. Ground Cover area: 3,400 square feet Hardscape area: 3,600 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 14 Fiscal Year 2011/12 C-12 The parkway on the east side of Hellman from Tryon to 665 feet north of Tryon. Ground Cover area: 8,280 square feet Hardscape area: 3,325 square feet C-13 The parkway on the west side of Hellman from 500 feet north of Church to Church. Ground Cover area: 2,416 square feet Hardscape area: 3,000 square feet C-14 The east side of Archibald from 196 feet north of Palo Alto to 530 feet north of Palo Alto. Ground Cover area: 4,262 square feet Hardscape area: 1,374 square feet C-15 The north side of San Bernardino from Summerlin to 225' west of Summerlin. Ground Cover area: 1,660 square feet Hardscape area: 710 square feet C-16 The south side of Base Line from 286 feet west of Hermosa to Hermosa. The raised planter on the southwest corner of Base Line and Hermosa. Ground Cover area: 4,190 square feet Hardscape area: 2,320 square feet C-17 The east side of Hellman from 775 feet south of 6th St. to 6th St. The south side of 6th St from Hellman to Golden Oak Rd. The west side of Golden Oak Rd. from 6th St. to Foxbrook Dr. Ground cover area: 9,058 square feet Hardscape area: 6,387 square feet D-1 The east side of Rochester from Church to Base Line. Ground Cover area: 11,126 square feet Turf area: 16,794 square feet Hardscape area: 17,301 square feet D-2 The east side of Rochester from 146 feet south of Chervil to Church St. Ground Cover area: 11,908 square feet Turt area: 9,950 square feet Hardscape area: 13,263 square feet D-3 The south side of Baseline from Rochester to 600 feet east of Rochester. Ground Cover area: 2,180 square feet Hardscape area: 4,121 square feet D-4 The north and south si des of Church St. from Rochester to 150 feet east of Hyssop Dr. Ground Cover area: 6,340 square feet Hardscape area: 8,887 square feet H-9 The Haven median fro m the 210 freeway to Alta Loma Drive. Ground cover area: 2,207 square feet H-10 The Haven median from entrance of Haven Village to Amber Lane. Ground Cover area: 4,402 square feet Turt area: 2,566 square feet The total square footage for the Ground Cover improvement is 8,804 and the Turf improvement square footage is 5,131; however, due to the location of the improvements the other half is maintained by the General Fund. Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 15 Fiscal Year 2011/12 H-11 The Haven median from Amber Lane to Olive Street. Ground Cover area: 3,289 square feet Turf area: 1,738 square feet The total square footage for the Ground Cover improvement is 6,577 and the Turf improvement square footage is 3,475; however, due to the location of the improvements the other half is maintained by the General Fund. H-12 The Haven median from Olive Street to 712 feet north of Wilson. Ground Cover area: 4,767 square feet Turt area: 9,950 square feet The total square footage for the Ground Cover improvement is 9,534 and the Turf improvement square footage is 3,933; however, due to the location of the improvements the other half is maintained by the General Fund. H-13 The Haven median from 19'" Street to the 210 freeway. Ground Cover area: 12,514 square feet FH-18 The Foothill median from East Avenue to 453 feet east of Cornwall Avenue. Ground Cover area: 5,450 square feet Ground cover, shrubs and turf areas that make up parkways, median islands and paseos are maintained under contract by a private landscape maintenance company. Parks are maintained by the City's Park Maintenance Crews. Map of Improvements The following page shows the map of landscaping improvements, including irrigation sites and community trails, to be maintained using District funds. Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 16 Fiscal Year 2011112 z~ o 50 S~%~>, N r O Z ntl ePUaM!13 V mL _~ Q ~~ ~ ~ ' m~m•~~ g ~ ntl uaneH N ~ ~ a ntl esowiaH ~u> ~- N a as ntl PIeO!4mtl N J a - ny uewllaH 1S ue!lawep U SZ VV ~~ ~ 6 u. ~U • v A m m = $ a ~ LL 0 o LL m o 0 er __ e u „ o _o_.o_..o.. _ ay~oH ° r _.~ m~o r a ~ ~ ~ z Q w w a ~ o z z z ~ ~ O O p ~ ~ ~ ~ Q Q Q cn 00 ~ O O Q w ~ ~ Q ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ ~ a ~ ;•-•ti o o ^O u , i i i u _...: to s~-. ntl 1sayPOH r uayill!W O y uaneH O asmuiau r r ~~ U 8 • V •~- VV .„ a V y '~ O •c+ ~~ Q m~U u na ~O ~ as a ~~ ntl uewllaH r a a °e a ~Q 0 ~ ¢V a ~ v ~m °a a .a - m f m O C LL ~ c n m x _ a ~Ez`~s `g mo ° °~~rg° ma yntl ano~~j o°mE°EmF o?g~=$o°s m cV'E@m, of 3~€Oo b °m m ~mg°EnovyEyu au 9u'g `a LUm cd_m _ ~ oE~~m°Z~e v& a arc vA °_vrc"&g°p~ s .. `c me g EA es m;E~o~aa'~S=P ~a ~Am~~=~z~aa`~~oos ESTIMATE OF COSTS The estimated costs of administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing the improvements as described in the Plans and Specifications are summarized below. Each year, as part of the assessment district levy calculation process, the costs and expenses are reviewed and the annual costs are projected for the following fiscal year. District Estimated 2011/12 Bud et Personnel Services Regular Payroll $142,250.00 Part-lime Salaries 22,400.00 Fringe Benefits 69,060.00 Subtotal Personnel $233,710.00 Operations and Maintenance Operations and Maintenance $68,850.00 O R M Facilities 11,500.00 Vehicle Operations and Maintenance ~ 2,000.00 Equipment Operations and Maintenance 3,800.00 Depreciation of Computer Equipment 440.00 Contract Services 604,390.00 Tree Maintenance 63,260.00 Utilities Telephone Utilities 3,440.00 Water Utilities 247,530.00 Electric Utilities 57,410.00 Assessment Administration 65,020.00 General Overhead 82.190.00 Subtotal Operations and Maintenance $1,209,740.00 Capital Expenditures Capital Outlav -Vehicles 5 390.00 Subtotal Capital Expenditures $5,390.00 Total Expenditure Budget $1,448,840.00 Total Estimated Assessment $1,189,920.00 Less Anticipated Delinquencies (70.440.001 Total Estimated Revenue $1,119,480.00 Plus Operating Reserve Fund Contribution 329.360.00 Total Expenditure Budget $1,448.840.00 Total Estimated Assessment $1,189,923.88 Total District EBU Count 12,889.30 Actual Assessment per EBU -Fiscal Year 2011/12 $92.21 Maximum Allowable Assessment er EBU -Fiscal Year 2011/12 92.21 Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 17 Fiscal Year 2011/12 The maximum allowable assessment per EBU listed in the District budget above, is the amount which was approved in 1996/97 and subsequent District annexations. Each year, prior to the assessments being placed on the tax roll, the City will review the budget and determine the amount needed to maintain the improvements for the upcoming fiscal year. The actual assessment per EBU will be based on the estimated costs of maintenance, available fund balance and maximum allowable assessment with the goal of maintaining the improvements in a satisfactory and healthy condition. The actual assessment amount may be lower than the maximum allowable assessment; however it may not exceed the maximum unless the increase is approved by the property owners in accordance with Proposition 218. It is the intent of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to maintain an Operating Reserve which shall not exceed the estimated costs of maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or when the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The reserve balance information for the District is as follows: Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2011 Reserve Fund Balance $738,330.00 Operating Reserve Contribution -Fiscal Year 2011/12 (329,360.00) Ooerating Reserve Collection -Fiscal Year 2011/12 0.00 Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2012 Reserve Fund Balance $408,970.00 Definitions of Budget Items The following definitions describe the costs and expenses included in the District Budget: Personnel Services Regular Salaries: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all full-time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Part Time Salaries: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all part time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Fringe Benefits: This item includes the benefits available to City employees: health care, vacation, sick time, and retirement fund. Operations and Maintenance Contract Services: This item includes the contract costs of a landscape maintenance company responsible for the ongoing maintenance of the District improvements. Tree Maintenance: This item includes the contract costs attributed to maintaining the street trees and other trees throughout the District. Utilities -Water: This item includes the costs to furnish water for the landscaping within the District. Utilities -Electric: This item includes the costs to furnish electricity required for the operation and maintenance of the sprinklers and irrigation controllers. Assessment Administration: This item includes the cost to all particular departments and staff of the City, and consultants for providing the administration, coordination and management of District services, operations, and incidental expenses related to the District. This item also includes creation of an annual engineer's report, resolutions and placing the assessment amounts onto the County tax Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 18 Fiscal Year 2011/12 roll each year, along with responding to any public inquiries and future Proposition 218 balloting proceedings. General Overhead: This item includes the costs of all departments and staff of the City for providing the coordination of District services, inspections, annual bid management, responding to public concerns, public education, accounting, auditing and procedural matters associated with the District. This item also includes an allocation for general City staff time for administrative functions and systems that provide for a functional and operational assessment district within the City's administrative structure. Capital Expenditures: Capital Projects: This item includes new improvements to further enhance the level and quality of service provided within the boundaries of the District. This may include new monuments, irrigation systems, and other large improvements. Operating Reserve Collection: O~erating Reserve Collection: This item includes the amount to be collected to maintain reserves to enable the City to pay for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or whenever the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The Reserve Fund contribution will continue until such a time the Reserve Fund balance is approximately one half of the annual costs. The fund may be allowed to accumulate in anticipation of any unforeseen expenses not included in the yearly maintenance costs. This may include, but is not limited to, tree replacements, repair of damaged equipment due to vandalism, storms and other similar events. Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 19 Fiscal Year 2011/12 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT General Pursuant to the 1972 Act and Article XIII D, all parcels that have a special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements and services shall be identified, and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel shall be determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of improvements. The 1972 Act, permits the establishment of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include the operation, maintenance and servicing of landscaping improvements. Section 22573 of the 1972 Act requires that maintenance assessments must be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. This Section states: "The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements." The determination of whether or not a lot or parcel will benefit from the improvements shall be made pursuant to the Improvement Act of 1911 (Division 7 (commencing with Section 5000) (of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California]." The 1972 Act also permits the designation of zones of benefit within any individual assessment district if "by reasons or variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive different degrees of benefit from the improvement" (Sec. 22547). Article XIII D, Section 4(a) of the California Constitution limits the amount of any assessment to the proportional special benefit conferred on the property. Article XIII D also provides that publicly owned properties must be assessed unless there is clear and convincing evidence that those properties receive no special benefit from the assessment. Exempted from the assessment would be the areas of public streets, public avenues, public lanes, public roads, public drives, public courts, public alleys, public easements and rights-of-ways, public greenbelts and public parkways. The net amount to be assessed may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels. Proposition 218, approved by the voters in November 1996, requires the City to separate general benefit from special benefit, where only special benefit is assessed. Benefit The maintenance and servicing of the improvements within the District (which are described in the Description of Services and Improvements Section of this report) are for the benefit of the properties within the District, and as such confer a special and direct benefit to parcels within the District by: • improving the livability, appearance, and desirability for properties within the boundaries of the District, and • ensuring that improvements do not reach a state of deterioration or disrepair so as to be materially detrimental to properties within the District, and Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 20 Fiscal Year 2011/12 • providing beautification, shade and overall enhancement to properties within the District. The above mentioned items affect the assessed property in a way that is particular and distinct from their effect on other parcels and that real property in general and the public at large do not share. They contribute to a specific enhancement of the properties within the District. Since these improvements, including the community trails, were installed and are maintained specifically for the properties within the District; only properties within the District receive a special benefit and are assessed for said maintenance. General Benefit In addition to the special benefits received by parcels within the District, there are derivative general benefits that are conferred on parcels outside the boundaries of the District which include: • the control of dust and insect infestations, and • the visual enhancement of the area to persons or vehicles that may travel through the District. However it has been determined that these benefits are derivative and do not provide a direct benefit to parcels outside of the district that are not being assessed. Method of Assessment Each of the parcels within the District is deemed to receive special benefit from the improvements. Each parcel that has a special benefit conferred upon it as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements are identified and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel is determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of the improvements. When the District was formed in 1979, Article XIII D and Proposition 218 had not yet been passed. Upon the passage of Article XIII D and the subsequent passage of the Proposition Omnibus Implementation Act, new rules were put into place. Due to the changes in legal requirements, as property annexed to the District after the passage of the Assessment Law, the description of the method of assessment became more refined, however, the assessment per parcel has remained the same since the 1996/97 Fiscal Year. Further, no parcel included in the District formation or annexations prior to when the language was refined, are now being levied differently than they were at the time the District was formed or the parcels were annexed. To assess special benefit appropriately, it is necessary to relate the different type of parcel improvements to each other. The Equivalent Benefit Unit ("EBU") method of apportionment uses the single family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single family home equals one Equivalent Benefit Unit (EBU). Every other land-use is converted to EBUs based on an assessment formula that equates to the property's specific development status, type of development (land-use), and size of the property, as compared to a single family home. Vacant parcels are assigned an EBU value of 0.25 per acre because they receive a lesser benefit from the improvements until such time as development occurs. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land-use types, as assigned by County use code, to determine each parcel's EBU assignment. Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 21 Fiscal Year 2011 /12 Land-Use Equivalent Dwelling Units Pro ert T e Count Use Code EBU Value Multi lier Single Family Residential 1.00 Dwelling Unit Multi-Family Residential 0.50 Dwelling Unit Non-Residential 2.00 Acre The use of the latest County Assessor's Secured Roll shall be the basis for the Property Type determination and units/acreage assignments, unless better data is available to the City. In addition, if any parcel within the District is identified by the County Auditor/Controller to bean invalid parcel number for the current fiscal year, the Property Type and EBU assignment shall be based on the correct parcel number and/or new parcel number(s) County use code and subsequent property information. If a single parcel has changed to multiple parcels, the EBU assignment and assessment amount applied to each of the new parcels will be recalculated rather than spread the proportionate share of the original assessment. The following table summarizes the Fiscal Year 2011/12 maximum allowable assessment rates for the District: Property Type (County Use Code) Maximum Allowable Assessment Rate er EBU Actual Assessment Rate er EBU Total UnitslAcres Total EBUs Single Family Residential $92.21 $92.21 7,819.00 7,824.00 Multi-Family Residential 92.21 92.21 7,992.00 3996.00 Non-Residential 92.21 92.21 14.30 28.60 The total amount of maintenance and incidental costs for maintaining the landscaping and community trail improvements is assessed to the individual parcels of real property within the District in proportion to the special benefit received by such parcels of real property. The proposed individual assessments are shown on the assessment roll in this report. Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 22 Fiscal Year 2011112 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM An Assessment Diagram for the District is shown on the following page. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the County Assessor of the County San Bernardino, at the time this report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Engineer's Report. Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 23 Fiscal Year 2011/12 w ~~ V •~ J Q o ~ C ' ~ U ~ . ~ A, N ; ~ o V ~ i _ ny ~(~~a4~ C1 ti . .._.._.._.._. ~ ~ J ti.r o ~ N N C 0 w ~ /~ w m ~ ~ 1 ,~ ~ 3 o ~ b~ ~ ~ m li Q i ~ ,, u;~r "' nV 3Se3 cn ~,y~~5., .~{p~ .. t /~~ ! 1L~* 6i 01~~C: Y/ ~1 M ~: y.~1 f ~ i ny epueM!13 - - - :~'F,~ ~ ;~ ny epuenn!33 st"x ~~ '•: ~rv%~ .~,~ 'v F~~ ~ ny~a~sayoob i ~ ~ j r ~~ ,c~ J i a. ,z ~t-3y ny ~alsayaoa ~ g ~, ~ ~ I / f xa ~~ ~t„e~ ~ ~a~ . ny ua~!II!W f._.._.._.._ ~ 1 -- - - ~ ~' -- - ~ h ~,'~°.i~^ <~ ny ua~!II!W ~ e fix. i ~ max, ny uaneH ,- . -,; . ~;. ny uaneH ` ~ ny esow~aH - ""'~~, ny esow~aH L tt ~YL qqF~a d e ~it'e9'~~r nd Pleq!4a~H .~ {~ ny Ple4!4~~t/ :. y,~ __ __~ ny uewpaH V ~ ~ ~ :::~r ` ~ ny uewllaH ~ Y r ~ ny p~e/au!n 1S ue!lawe~ g~vg5zso2i°£ 3 F~sfE~@s~E Epfi°3s ~a5~E~yyP~,p3] ~F5 C Q~ ~ ~ E))Q.{€ ejb L~E L $~ B J -_ ?i t i~~E~y a$ QI N L O W §Y,a 7-3E~j Ec ~ !n ~ ~ €S°s~E~Y+e&g v ~ ~a~~i#~~~figg~~ = m ~~~ ~~3 i~elY E9~~rs eEeea //// ~° ~aa~3eai~Q~~ ak E33g~g3g§~`s~ U ~t£eflE~@e~ee ASSESSMENT ROLL Assessment Roll The assessment roll is a listing of the assessment for Fiscal Year 2011/12 apportioned to each lot or parcel, as shown on the last equalized roll of the Assessor of the County of San Bernardino. The following tables summarize the Fiscal Year 2011/12 maximum and actual assessments for the District: Property Type (County Use Code Maximum Allowable Assessment Rate er EBU Total Units/Acres Total EBUs Maximum Allowable Assessment Single Family Residential $92.21 7,819.00 7,819.00 $720,980.00 Multi-Family Residential 92.21 10,112.00 5,056.00 466,290.00 Non-ResidentialNacant 92.21 28.60 14.30 2,640.00 TOTALS 17,959.60 12,869.30 $1,189,923.00 Property Type (County Use Code Actual Assessment Rate er EBU Total Units/Acres Total EBUs Actual Assessment Single Family Residential $92.21 7,819.00 7,819.00 $720,989.99 Multi-Family Residential 92.21 10,112.00 5,056.00 466,295.67 Non-ResidentialNacant 92.21 28.60 14.30 2,637.22 TOTALS 17,959.60 12,889.30 $1,189,923.88 A copy of the full assessment roll is available for review in the City Clerk's office. Annexations The following annexations are effective for the 2011/12 Fiscal Year: Assessor's Parcel Number Annexation Date Pro'ect Total Units/Acres Total EBUs Property Type Count Use Code Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 24 Fiscal Year 2011/12 Revised Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2011/2012 City of Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 3A (Hyssop) CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3A (HYSSOP MAINTENANCE DISTRICT) 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Phone: 909.477.2740 Fax: 909.477.2741 CITY COUNCIL L. Dennis Michael, Mayor Sam Spagnolo, Mayor Pro Tem William Alexander, Council Member Chuck Buquet, Council Member Diane Williams, Council Member CITY STAFF John R. Gillison, Assistant City Manager Linda D. Daniels, Deputy City Manager William Wittkopf, Public Works Director Ingrid Y. Bruce, GIS/Special Districts Manager Christopher Bopko, Management Analyst III TABLE OF CONTENTS ENGINEER'S LETTER INTRODUCTION 1 3 Reason for Assessment .............................................................................................3 Process for Annual Assessment .................................................................................3 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS 5 Description of the Boundaries of the District ...............................................................5 Description of Improvements and Services ................................................................5 Map of Improvements .................................................................................................5 ESTIMATE OF COSTS 6 District Budget ............................................................................................................6 Definitions of Budget Items .........................................................................................7 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT 9 General .......................................................................................................................9 Special Benefit ...........................................................................................................9 General Benefit ........................................................................................................10 Method of Assessment Spread ................................................................................10 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM ASSESSMENT ROLL 12 13 Assessment Roll .......................................................................................................13 Annexations ..............................................................................................................13 ENGINEER'S LETTER WHEREAS, on ,the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga (the "City"), under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 (the "1972 Act") adopted its Resolution No. _, a Resolution Initiating Proceedings for the Levy of Annual Assessments for Landscape Maintenance District No. 3A (Hyssop Maintenance District) (the "District"); and WHEREAS, the Resolution Initiating Proceedings staff prepared and filed an Engineer's Report for Fiscal Year 2011/12 pursuant to the requirements of the 1972 Act. The Engineer's Report presents the plans and specifications describing the general nature, location and extent of the improvements to be maintained, an estimate of the costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements for the District for the referenced fiscal year, a diagram for the District, showing the area and properties proposed to be assessed, and an assessment of the estimated costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing the improvements, assessing the net amount upon all assessable lots and/or parcels within the District in proportion to the special benefit received; and NOW THEREFORE, the following assessment is proposed to be authorized in order to pay the estimated costs of maintenance, operation and servicing of the improvements to be paid by the assessable real property within the boundaries of the District in proportion to the special benefit received. The following table summarizes the proposed assessment. SUMMARY OF ASSESSMENT Fiscal Year 2011112 Total Estimated Assessment $3,720.00 Plus Anticipated Delinquency Penalty 520.00 Total Estimated Revenue $4,240.00 Plus Reserve Fund Contribution 600.00 Total Expenditure Budget $4,840.00 Total District EBU Count 9.00 Actual Assessment per EBU $413.74 Maximum Allowable Assessment per EBU $413.74 In making the assessments contained herein pursuant to the 1972 Act: I have identified all parcels which will have a special benefit conferred upon them from the improvements described in the Special Benefit Section of this Engineer's Report (the "Specially Benefited Parcels"). For particulars as to the identification of said parcels, reference is made to the Assessment Diagram, a copy of which is included in this Engineer's Report. 2. I have evaluated the costs and expenses of the improvements upon the Specially Benefited Parcels. In making such evaluation: Landscape Maintenance District No. 3A-City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2011/12 a. The proportionate special benefit derived by each Specially Benefited Parcel from the improvements was determined in relationship to the entirety of the maintenance costs of the improvements; b. No assessment has been imposed on any Specially Benefited Parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on such parcel from the improvements; and c. Any general benefits from the improvements have been separated from the special benefits and only special benefits have been assessed. I, the undersigned, respectfully submit the enclosed Engineer's Report and, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, the Engineer's Report, Assessments, and the Assessment Diagram herein have been prepared and computed in accordance with the order of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Assessment Law. Mark A. Steuer, City Engineer Landscape Maintenance District No. 3A-City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2011/12 INTRODUCTION Reason for Assessment Approval of the assessment covered by this Engineer's Report will generate the revenue necessary to: Provide for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements described in this Engineer's Report. Maintenance may include but is not limited to, all of the following: the repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement, providing for the life, growth, health and beauty of the landscaping, including cultivation, irrigation, trimming, spraying, fertilizing or treating for disease or injury, the removal of trimming, rubbish, debris and other solid waste, the maintenance, repair and replacement as necessary of all irrigation systems and the removal of graffiti from walls immediately adjacent to the cultivated areas. Servicing means the furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operating and servicing of any improvement. Servicing shall also include vehicle, equipment, capital improvements and administrative costs associated with the annual administration and operation of the District. Process for Annual Assessment The City cannot levy and collect annual assessments within the District without complying with the procedures specified in the 1972 Act. On an annual basis, an Engineer's Report must be prepared which contains a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the district. The City Council must also adopt a resolution of intention which: • Declares the intention of the City Council to levy and collect assessments within the assessment district for the fiscal year stated therein. • Generally describes the existing and proposed improvements and any substantial changes proposed to be made in existing improvements. • Refers to the assessment district by its distinctive designation and indicate the general location of the district. • Refers to the report of the engineer, on file with the clerk, for a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the district. • Gives notice of the time and place for public hearing by the City Council on the levy of the proposed assessment. • States whether the assessment is proposed to increase from the previous year. If the assessments are to be levied in the same or lesser amounts than the maximum assessment amount approved, the clerk shall give notice by causing the resolution of intention to be published. Any interested person may, prior to the conclusion of the public hearing, file a written protest which shall state all grounds of objection. The protest shall contain a description sufficient to identify the property owned by the property owner filing the protest. During the course or upon conclusion of the hearing, the City Council may order changes in any of the matters provided in the report, including changes in the improvements, any zones within the assessment district, and the proposed diagram or the proposed assessment. The City Council, upon conclusion of the public hearing must then adopt a resolution confirming the diagram and assessment, either as originally proposed or as changed by it. The adoption of the resolution shall constitute the levy of an assessment for the fiscal year referred to in the assessment. Landscape Maintenance District No. 3A -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2011/12 If the assessment to be levied exceeds the maximum assessment amount previously approved, the City must comply with the procedures specified in Article XIIID and Proposition 218. The voters in the State of California in November 1996 added Article XIIID to the California Constitution imposing, among other requirements, the necessity for the City to conduct an assessment ballot procedure to enable the owners of each property on which assessments are proposed to be enacted or increased, the opportunity to express their support for, or opposition to the proposed assessment or increase in such assessment. The basic steps of the assessment ballot procedure are outlined below. The City must prepare a Notice of Public Hearing ("Notice'), which describes, along with other mandated information, the reason for the proposed assessments, and to provide a date and time of a public hearing to be held on the matter. The City must also prepare an assessment ballot, which clearly gives the property owner the ability to sign and mark their assessment ballot either in favor of, or in opposition to the proposed assessment. The Notice and assessment ballot are mailed to each affected property owner within the District a minimum of 45 days prior to the public hearing date as shown in the Notice. The City may also hold community meetings with the property owners to discuss the issues facing the District and to answer property owner questions directly. After the Notice and assessment ballot are mailed, property owners are given until the close of the public hearing, stated in the Notice, to return their signed and marked assessment ballot. During the public hearing, property owners are given the opportunity to address the City Council and ask questions or voice their concerns. At the public hearing, the returned assessment ballots received prior to the close of the public hearing are tabulated, weighted by the proposed assessment amount on each property and the results are announced by the City Council. Article XIIID provides that if, as a result of the assessment ballot proceeding, a majority protest is found to exist, the City Council shall not have the authority to levy and collect the assessments as proposed. A majority protest exists if the assessments represented by ballots submitted in opposition exceed those submitted in favor of the assessment. All returned ballots are tabulated and weighted according to the financial obligation of each particular parcel. If there is no majority protest as described above, the City Council may approve the proposed assessments. If there is a majority protest, as described above, the City will not levy and collect any assessments. Landscape Maintenance District No. 3A-City of Rancho Cucamonga 4 Fiscal Year 2011/12 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS The District provides for the administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing of various improvements located within the public right-of-way and dedicated easements within the boundaries of the District. of the Boundaries of the District The District is located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California. The boundaries of the District are generally described as that area of the City South and East of Hyssop Drive south of 6`" Street. Reference is also made to the Assessment Diagram included in this Report. Description of Improvements and Services The improvements are the maintenance and servicing of landscaping sites and appurtenant facilities throughout the District. The landscaping maintenance includes, but is not limited to, shrubs, turt, tree trimming, weed and pest control, landscape irrigation systems and testing, trash, debris and graffiti removal, and associated appurtenant facilities. Services include personnel, materials, contracting services, utilities, and all necessary costs associated with the maintenance, replacement and repair required to keep the improvements in a healthy, vigorous and satisfactory condition. In addition, it is the City's intention to continue to use cost effective materials, including the future ability to replace landscaping with drought resistant or low water use plants, in order to lower expenses of the District. The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows: Site # Descriptive Location J-1 The west side of Hyssop from south of 6~' street to the south end of the cul-de-sac. Ground Cover area: 6,050 square feet. Map of Improvements The following page shows the map of landscaping improvements, including irrigation sites and community trails, to be maintained using District funds. Landscape Maintenance District No. 3A -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2011/12 a z w Z ~ w r a J w w z z ~ O J O ~ Q J Q W w (~ ~ C7 Y O w" U ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ W ~ ~ ° ° = 111 1;~ M ~~ ~~~ C a~ V ~ •~ ° '',~~~~.1.1~5+pNRP, ~ ~ ,~, ° i '~ ~ ••• V i •'' M~ 56 I dbj~ SL ~~ ~ ~ N ~ M~ S~ I dbj~ SL ~ ; ° H / ~ 0 co ,~ ~ d21fV0 S L I (~ Q o ~ o o •,~ o F, Jr -m m~~ cmc Tc rEcLm m~$E E E E y ~ 4~- 'o ffi ~ V '~ o ~,p m ~ ~$ o t= t t E.v W E~~ - m o m c g~ o s ~ °cw~uamWEugmffi'~a`o°°~ N ,p~oYUOF-o,Pxc'cm> E U~ Q aQ o_ 9 C m 3 m v m i° c° ffi tm `o ~ m m o= gy m Ln m o n~ o o g `o c m o E n o $ m 9 > msn t$ ~Y~ V c O m O 0 m$ a Z" O m, O C ,Z, smm5°co°oanm _~ B~~'cm oE'c taco.,s f-4 E°m aom ~E ono-m ESTIMATE OF COSTS The estimated costs of administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing the improvements as described in the Plans and Specifications are summarized below. Each year, as part of the assessment district levy calculation process, the costs and expenses are reviewed and the annual costs are projected for the following fiscal year. District Estimated 2011/12 Bud et Personnel Services Regular Payroll $0.00 Part-time Salaries 0.00 Fringe Benefits 0.00 Subtotal Personnel $0.00 Operations and Maintenance Operations and Maintenance $200.00 Contract Services 3,230.00 Tree Maintenance 0.00 Utilities Water Utilities 580.00 Electric Utilities 600.00 Assessment Administration 50.00 General Overhead 260.00 Subtotal Operations and Maintenance $4,840.00 Capital Expenditures Capital Projects 0.00 Subtotal Capital Expenditures $0.00 Total Expenditure Budget $5,340.00 Total Estimated Assessment $3,720.00 Plus Anticipated Delinquency Penalty 520.00 Total Estimated Revenue $4,240.00 Plus Operating Reserve Fund Contribution 600.00 Total Expenditure Budget $4,840.00 Total Estimated Assessment $3,720.00 Total District EBU Count 9.00 Actual Assessment per EBU -Fiscal Year 2011/12 $413.74 Maximum Allowable Assessment er EBU -Fiscal Year 2011/12 $413.74 The maximum allowable assessment per EBU listed in the District budget above, is the amount which was approved in 1996/97 and subsequent District annexations. Each year, prior to the assessments being placed on the tax roll, the City will review the budget and determine the amount needed to maintain the improvements for the upcoming fiscal year. The actual assessment per EBU will be based on the estimated costs of maintenance, available fund balance and maximum allowable assessment with the goal of maintaining the improvements in a satisfactory and healthy condition. Landscape Maintenance District No. 3A -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2011/12 The actual assessment amount may be lower than the maximum allowable assessment; however it may not exceed the maximum unless the increase is approved by the property owners in accordance with Proposition 218. It is the intent of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to maintain an Operating Reserve which shall not exceed the estimated costs of maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or when the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The reserve balance information for the District is as follows: Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2011 Reserve Fund Balance $45,050.00 Operating Reserve Contribution -Fiscal Year 2011/12 (600.00) Operating Reserve Collection -Fiscal Year 2011/12 0.00 Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2012 Reserve Fund Balance $44,450.00 Definitions of Budget Items The following definitions describe the costs and expenses included in the District Budget Personnel Services Regular Salaries: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all full-time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Part Time Salaries: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all part time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Frinoe Benefits: This item includes the benefits available to City employees: health care, vacation, sick time, and retirement fund. Operations and Maintenance Contract Services: This item includes the contract costs of a landscape maintenance company responsible for the ongoing maintenance of the District improvements. Tree Maintenance: This item includes the contract costs attributed to maintaining the street trees and other trees throughout the District. Utilities -Water: This item includes the costs to furnish water for the landscaping within the District. Utilities -Electric: This item includes the costs to furnish electricity required for the operation and maintenance of the sprinklers and irrigation controllers. Assessment Administration: This item includes the cost to all particular departments and staff of the City, and consultants for providing the administration, coordination and management of District services, operations, and incidental expenses related to the District. This item also includes creation of an annual engineer's report, resolutions and placing the assessment amounts onto the County tax roll each year, along with responding to any public inquiries and future Proposition 218 balloting proceedings. General Overhead: This item includes the costs of all departments and staff of the City for providing the coordination of District services, inspections, annual bid management, responding to public concerns, public education, accounting, auditing and procedural matters associated with the District. This item also includes an allocation for general City staff time for administrative functions and Landscape Maintenance District No. 3A -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2011/12 systems that provide for a functional and operational assessment district within the City's administrative structure. Capital Expenditures: Capital Projects: This item includes new improvements to further enhance the level and quality of service provided within the boundaries of the District. This may include new monuments, irrigation systems, and other large improvements. Operating Reserve Collection: Operating Reserve Collection: This item includes the amount to be collected to maintain reserves to enable the City to pay for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or whenever the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The Reserve Fund contribution will continue until such a time the Reserve Fund balance is approximately one half of the annual costs. The fund may be allowed to accumulate in anticipation of any unforeseen expenses not included in the yearly maintenance costs. This may include, but is not limited to, tree replacements, repair of damaged equipment due to vandalism, storms and other similar events. Landscape Maintenance District No. 3A-City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2011/12 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT General Pursuant to the 1972 Act and Article XIIID, all parcels that have a special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements and services shall be identified, and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel shall be determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of improvements. The 1972 Act, permits the establishment of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include the operation, maintenance and servicing of landscaping improvements. Section 22573 of the 1972 Act requires that maintenance assessments must be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. This Section states: "The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district maybe apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements." The determination of whether or not a lot or parcel will benefit from the improvements shall be made pursuant to the Improvement Act of 1911 (Division 7 (commencing with Section 5000) (of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California]." The 1972 Act also permits the designation of zones of benefit within any individual assessment district if "by reasons or variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive different degrees of benefit from the improvement" (Sec. 22547). Article XIIID, Section 4(a) of the California Constitution limits the amount of any assessment to the proportional special benefit conferred on the property. Article XIIID also provides that publicly owned properties must be assessed unless there is clear and convincing evidence that those properties receive no special benefit from the assessment. Exempted from the assessment would be the areas of public streets, public avenues, public lanes, public roads, public drives, public courts, public alleys, public easements and rights-of-ways, public greenbelts and public parkways. The net amount to be assessed may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels. Proposition 218, approved by the voters in November 1996, requires the City to separate general benefit from special benefit, where only special benefit is assessed. Benefit The maintenance and servicing of the improvements within the District (which are described in the Description of Services and Improvements Section of this report) are for the benefit of the properties within the District, and as such confer a special and direct benefit to parcels within the District by: improving the livability, appearance, and desirability for properties within the boundaries of the District, and ensuring that improvements do not reach a state of deterioration or disrepair so as to be materially detrimental to properties within the District, and Landscape Maintenance District No. 3A -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2011/12 • providing beautification, shade and overall enhancement to properties within the District. The above mentioned items affect the assessed property in a way that is particular and distinct from their effect on other parcels and that real property in general and the public at large do not share. They contribute to a specific enhancement of the properties within the District. Since these improvements, including the community trails, were installed and are maintained specifically for the properties within the District; only properties within the District receive a special benefit and are assessed for. said maintenance. General Benefit In addition to the special benefits received by parcels within the District, there are derivative general benefits that are conferred on parcels outside the boundaries of the District which include: • the control of dust and insect infestations, and • the visual enhancement of the area to persons or vehicles that may travel through the District. However it has been determined that these benefits are derivative and do not provide a direct benefit to parcels outside of the district that are not being assessed. Method of Assessment Spread Each of the parcels within the District is deemed to receive special benefit from the improvements. Each parcel that has a special benefit conferred upon it as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements are identified and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel is determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of the improvements. When the District was formed in 1984, Article XIIID and Proposition 218 had not yet been passed. Upon the passage of Article XIIID and the subsequent passage of the Proposition Omnibus Implementation Act, new rules were put into place. Due to the changes in legal requirements, as property annexed to the District after the passage of the Assessment Law, the description of the method of assessment became more refined, however, the assessment per parcel has remained the same since the 1996/97 Fiscal Year. Further, no parcel included in the District formation or annexations prior to when the language was refined, are now being levied differently than they were at the time the District was formed or the parcels were annexed. To assess special benefit appropriately, it is necessary to relate the different type of parcel improvements to each other. The Equivalent Benefit Unit ("EBU") method of apportionment uses the single family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single family home equals one Equivalent Benefit Unit (EBU). Every other land-use is converted to EBUs based on an assessment formula that equates to the property's specific development status, type of development (land-use), and size of the property, as compared to a single family home. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land-use types, as assigned by County use code, to determine each parcel's EBU assignment. Land-Use Equivalent Dwelling Units Pro ert T e Count Use Code EBU Value Multi tier Non-Residential 1.00 Parcel Landscape Maintenance District No. 3A -City of Rancho Cucamonga 10 Fiscal Year 2011/12 The use of the latest County Assessor's Secured Roll shall be the basis for the Property Type determination and units/acreage assignments, unless better data is available to the City. In addition, if any parcel within the District is identified by the County Auditor/Controller to be an invalid parcel number for the current fiscal year, the Property Type and EBU assignment shall be based on the correct parcel number and/or new parcel number(s) County use code and subsequent property information. If a single parcel has changed to multiple parcels, the EBU assignment and assessment amount applied to each of the new parcels will be recalculated rather than spread the proportionate share of the original assessment. The following table summarizes the Fiscal Year 2011/12 maximum allowable assessment rates for the District: Maximum Allowable Property Type Assessment Rate Actual Assessment Total Total (County Use Code) er EBU Rate per EBU Units/Acres EBUs Non-Residential $413.74 $413.74 9 9 The total amount of maintenance and incidental costs for maintaining the landscaping and community trail improvements is assessed to the individual parcels of real property within the District in proportion to the special benefit received by such parcels of real property. The proposed individual assessments are shown on the assessment roll in this report. Landscape Maintenance District No. 3A -City of Rancho Cucamonga 11 Fiscal Year 2011/12 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM An Assessment Diagram for the District is shown on the following page. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the County Assessor of the County San Bernardino, at the time this report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Engineer's Report. Landscape Maintenance District No. 3A -City of Rancho Cucamonga 12 Fiscal Year 2011/12 M w V •- `IV ~~ O v C ._ a J ny ua~!II!W c ~ SO ~ \ i' l ~__~ ny lJJay~ d C _ J ~] ~ N = 3 '~ m 0 0 ,l\ ri Q N Q J Q J~ ~ U ~ ~ ~. ~~ J ti•r ~N ® ~ O 0 N O ^</ lse3 in ~I ~ ~ ny epueiny3 - - - -~ / , - ~ -.._.._ . ny epueMg3 ~ / ~,,jj --- ~ _ ,:~ii ~ 3 ~aaJ~ lea I ~ _.._.._.._.._.._.._..i B ny Ja~sayooa i ~ -- - - ~--- -t - ny uaneH ~ - i i ny esowJaH j i nH Pleq!4oJV i i i ny uewllaH i 3S ue!lawe~ ; - of ~v Jl C_ U ~ ~( ~~ ny Jalsayooa I ny ua~!II!W ~ I - - - - ~ ny uaneH - ~ ! r ( - ~ -lnyesowJaH - - ---~ - ' inV Pleq!4oJb' I ! i j ~- ~ -- - - - } ~- -- ~s• ~ ny uewllaH I /t~ L ~ co ~ - -i ny pJelau!/~ - -,- f - ~--~ ~- ..-__ ~ ~ N N ~ C N (0 m 2 ~ C O] ~ .. ~ "ter ntf anOJ~ J= J -_ ?~ L 61 N L O 00 41 m ~ Q °s 's E~iai E3ae~ ;s9 esg~~ ASSESSMENT ROLL Assessment Roll The assessment roll is a listing of the assessment for Fiscal Year 2011/12 apportioned to each lot or parcel, as shown on the last equalized roll of the Assessor of the County of San Bernardino. The following tables summarize the Fiscal Year 2011/12 maximum and actual assessments for the District: Maximum Allowable Maximum Property Type Assessment Rate Total Total Allowable Count Use Code er EBU UnitslAcres EBUs Assessment Non-Residential $413.74 9 9 $3,723.66 Actual Property Type Assessment Rate Total Total Actual Coun Use Code er EBU UnitslAcres EBUs Assessment Non-Residential $413.74 9 9 $3,723.66 A copy of the full assessment roll is available for review in the City Clerk's office. Annexations There were no annexations effective for the 2011112 Fiscal Year: Landscape Maintenance District No. 3A -City of Rancho Cucamonga 13 Fiscal Year 2011/12 Revised Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2011/2012 City of Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B (Commercial Industrial) CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B (COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL MAINTENANCE DISTRICT) 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Phone: 909.477.2740 Fax: 909.477.2741 CITY COUNCIL L. Dennis Michael, Mayor Sam Spagnolo, Mayor Pro Tem William Alexander, Council Member Chuck Buquet, Council Member Diane Williams, Council Member CITY STAFF John R. Gillison, Assistant City Manager Linda D. Daniels, Deputy City Manager William Wittkopf, Public Works Director Ingrid Y. Bruce, GIS/Special Districts Manager Christopher Bopko, Management Analyst III TABLE OF CONTENTS ENGINEER'S LETTER INTRODUCTION 1 3 Reason for Assessment .............................................................................................3 Process for Annual Assessment .................................................................................3 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS 5 Description of the Boundaries of the District ...............................................................5 Description of Improvements and Services ................................................................5 Map of Improvements .................................................................................................7 ESTIMATE OF COSTS 8 District Budget ............................................................................................................8 Definitions of Budget Items .........................................................................................9 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT 11 General .....................................................................................................................11 Special Benefit .........................................................................................................11 General Benefit ........................................................................................................12 Method of Assessment Spread ................................................................................12 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM ASSESSMENT ROLL 14 15 Assessment Roll .......................................................................................................15 Annexations ..............................................................................................................15 ENGINEER'S LETTER WHEREAS, on ,the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga (the "City"), under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 (the "1972 Act") adopted its Resolution No. _, a Resolution Initiating Proceedings for the Levy of Annual Assessments for Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B (Commercial Industrial Maintenance District) (the "District"); and WHEREAS, the Resolution Initiating Proceedings directed NBS to prepare and file an Engineer's Report for Fiscal Year 2011/12 pursuant to the requirements of the 1972 Act. The Engineer's Report presents the plans and specifications describing the general nature, location and extent of the improvements to be maintained, an estimate of the costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements for the District for the referenced fiscal year, a diagram for the District, showing the area and properties proposed to be assessed, and an assessment of the estimated costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing the improvements, assessing the net amount upon all assessable lots and/or parcels within the District in proportion to the special benefit received; and NOW THEREFORE, the following assessment is proposed to be authorized in order to pay the estimated costs of maintenance, operation and servicing of the improvements to be paid by the assessable real property within the boundaries of the District in proportion to the special benefit received. The following table summarizes the proposed assessment. SUMMARY OF ASSESSMENT Fiscal Year 2011/12 Total Estimated Assessment $977,290.00 Less Anticipated Delinquencies 39 970.00 Total Estimated Revenue $937,320.00 Plus Reserve Fund Contribution 434 900.00 Total Expenditure Budget $1,372,220.00 Total District EBU Count 2,775.5055 Actual Assessment per EBU $352.80 Maximum Allowable Assessment per EBU $352.80 In making the assessments contained herein pursuant to the 1972 Act: 1. I have identified all parcels which will have a special benefit conferred upon them from the improvements described in the Special Benefit Section of this Engineer's Report (the "Specially Benefited Parcels"). For particulars as to the identification of said parcels, reference is made to the Assessment Diagram, a copy of which is included in this Engineer's Report. I have evaluated the costs and expenses of the improvements upon the Specially Benefited Parcels. In making such evaluation: Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2011/12 a. The proportionate special benefit derived by each Specially Benefited Parcel from the improvements was determined in relationship to the entirety of the maintenance costs of the improvements; b. No assessment has been imposed on any Specially Benefited Parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on such parcel from the improvements; and c. Any general benefits from the improvements have been separated from the special benefits and only special benefits have been assessed. I, the undersigned, respectfully submit the enclosed Engineer's Report and, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, the Engineer's Report, Assessments, and the Assessment Diagram herein have been prepared and computed in accordance with the order of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Assessment Law. '"`. ~ ~~ C Mark A. Steuer, City Engineer Landscape Maintenance District No. 36 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2011/12 INTRODUCTION Reason for Assessment Approval of the assessment covered by this Engineer's Report will generate the revenue necessary to: Provide for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements described in this Engineer's Report. Maintenance may include but is not limited to, all of the following: the repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement, providing for the life, growth, health and beauty of the landscaping, including cultivation, irrigation, trimming, spraying, fertilizing or treating for disease or injury, the removal of trimming, rubbish, debris and other solid waste, the maintenance, repair and replacement as necessary of all irrigation systems and the removal of graffiti from walls immediately adjacent to the cultivated areas. Servicing means the furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operating and servicing of any improvement. Servicing shall also include vehicle, equipment, capital improvements and , administrative costs associated with the annual administration and operation of the District. Process for Annual Assessment The City cannot levy and collect annual assessments within the District without complying with the procedures specified in the 1972 Act. On an annual basis, an Engineer's Report must be prepared which contains a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the district. The City Council must also adopt a resolution of intention which: • Declares the intention of the City Council to levy and collect assessments within the assessment district for the fiscal year stated therein. • Generally describes the existing and proposed improvements and any substantial changes proposed to be made in existing improvements. • Refers to the assessment district by its distinctive designation and indicate the general location of the district. • Refers to the report of the engineer, on file with the clerk, for a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the district. • Gives notice of the time and place for public hearing by the City Council on the levy of the proposed assessment. • States whether the assessment is proposed to increase from the previous year. If the assessments are to be levied in the same or lesser amounts than the maximum assessment amount approved, the clerk shall give notice by causing the resolution of intention to be published. Any interested person may, prior to the conclusion of the public hearing, file a written protest which shall state all grounds of objection. The protest shall contain a description sufficient to identify the property owned by the property owner filing the protest. During the course or upon conclusion of the hearing, the City Council may order changes in any of the matters provided in the report, including changes in the improvements, any zones within the assessment district, and the proposed diagram or the proposed assessment. The City Council, upon conclusion of the public hearing must then adopt a resolution confirming the diagram and assessment, either as originally proposed or as changed by it. The adoption of the resolution shall constitute the levy of an assessment for the fiscal year referred to in the assessment. Landscape Maintenance District No. 36 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2011/12 If the assessment to be levied exceeds the maximum assessment amount previously approved, the City must comply with the procedures specified in Article XIIID and Proposition 218. The voters in the State of California in November 1996 added Article XIIID to the California Constitution imposing, among other requirements, the necessity for the City to conduct an assessment ballot procedure to enable the owners of each property on which assessments are proposed to be enacted or increased, the opportunity to express their support for, or opposition to the proposed assessment or increase in such assessment. The basic steps of the assessment ballot procedure are outlined below. The City must prepare a Notice of Public Hearing ("Notice'), which describes, along with other mandated information, the reason for the proposed assessments, and to provide a date and time of a public hearing to be held on the matter. The City must also prepare an assessment ballot, which clearly gives the property owner the ability to sign and mark their assessment ballot either in favor of, or in opposition to the proposed assessment. The Notice and assessment ballot are mailed to each affected property owner within the District a minimum of 45 days prior to the public hearing date as shown in the Notice. The City may also hold community meetings with the property owners to discuss the issues facing the District and to answer property owner questions directly. After the Notice and assessment ballot are mailed, property owners are given until the close of the public hearing, stated in the Notice, to return their signed and marked assessment ballot. During the public hearing, property owners are given the opportunity to address the City Council and ask questions or voice their concerns. At the public hearing, the returned assessment ballots received prior to the close of the public hearing are tabulated, weighted by the proposed assessment amount on each property and the results are announced by the City Council. Article XIIID provides that if, as a result of the assessment ballot proceeding, a majority protest is found to exist, the City Council shall not have the authority to levy and collect the assessments as proposed. A majority protest exists if the assessments represented by ballots submitted in opposition exceed those submitted in favor of the assessment. All returned ballots are tabulated and weighted according to the financial obligation of each particular parcel. If there is no majority protest as described above, the City Council may approve the proposed assessments. If there is a majority protest, as described above, the City will not levy and collect any assessments. Landscape Maintenance District No. 36 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2011/12 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS The District provides for the administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing of various improvements located within the public right-of-way and dedicated easements within the boundaries of the District. of the Boundaries of the District The District is located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California. The boundaries of the District are generally described as that area of the City South and East of Hyssop Drive south of 6`" Street. Reference is also made to the Assessment Diagram included in this Report. Description of Improvements and Services The improvements are the maintenance and servicing of landscaping sites and appurtenant facilities throughout the District. The landscaping maintenance includes, but is not limited to, shrubs, turf, tree trimming, weed and pest control, landscape irrigation systems and testing, trash, debris and graffiti removal, and associated appurtenant facilities. Services include personnel, materials, contracting services, utilities, and all necessary costs associated with the maintenance, replacement and repair required to keep the improvements in a healthy, vigorous and satisfactory condition. In addition, it is the City's intention to continue to use cost effective materials, including the future ability to replace landscaping with drought resistant or low water use plants, in order to lower expenses of the District. The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows: Site # Descriptive Location J-2 The monument at the northeast corner of Haven and 4th Street. Ground Cover area: 5,715 square feet Turt area: 6,068 square feet J-3 The 6th street median from Milliken to Pittsburg. Ground Cover area: 3,300 square feet J-4 The entry monuments on the east and west side of 4th and Milliken. Ground Cover area: 19,771 square feet Turt area 9,060 square feet J-5 The Milliken median from Arrow to Jersey Ground Cover area: 10,220 square feet J-6 The Spruce median from Foothill to White Oak. Ground Cover area: 4,300 square feet J-7 The 6th Street median from Pittsburg to Richmond. Ground Cover area: 5,114 square feet J-8 The 6th Street median from Richmond to Buffalo. Ground Cover area: 2,476 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 38 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 5 Prepared by NBS -Fiscal Year 2011/12 J-9 The Milliken railroad underpass. Ground Cover area: 165,633 square feet 12-12-01 added 5199 sq feet Turf area: 4,897 square feet J-10 The 6th street median from Cleveland to 1,820 feet east of Cleveland. Ground Cover area: 13,310 square feet J-11 The 6th Street median from Buffalo to Rochester. Ground cover area: 12,400 square feet J-12 The Milliken median from Arrow to Century. Ground Cover area: 13,855 square feet J-13 The Milliken median from Century to Foothill Blvd. Ground Cover area: 3,330 square feet J-14 The 6th Street median from Utica to Cleveland. Ground Cover area: 8,559 square feet J-15 The 6th Street median form Haven to Utica. Ground Cover area: 7,680 square feet. J-16 Day Creek median from Church to Foothill. Ground cover area: 8,466 square feet *Site was 2-9 and maintained by TruGreen. Now maintained by Mariposa. J-17 The Day Creek medians south of Foothill including the traffic circle. Ground cover area: 6,490 square feet *Site was 2-10 and maintained by TruGreen. Now maintained by Mariposa. H-1 The Haven median from 4th Street to 6th Street. Ground cover area: 12,270 square feet Turf area: 8,935 square feet H-2 The Haven medians from 6th Street to the underpass bridge. The east and west side parkways and slopes on Haven from Acacia Street to underpass bridge. Ground cover area: 51,760 square feet Turf area: 2,960 square feet 'Site increased on 9-22-10 due to Haven Underpass Project H-3 The Haven medians from underpass bridge to Arrow Route. The east and west side parkways and slopes on Haven from the underpass bridge to Jersey Blvd... Ground cover area: 53,181 square feet Turf area: 3,029 square feet 'Site increased on 9-22-10 due to Haven Underpass Project H-4 The Haven median from Arrow Route to Foothill. Ground cover area: 8,348 square feet Turf area: 6,808 square feet FH-1 The Foothill median from Spruce to Haven. Ground cover area: 4,571 square feet The total square footage for the improvement is 9,141; however, due to the location of the improvement the other half is maintained by LMD 4-R. FH-2 The Foothill median from Spruce to Milliken. Ground cover area: 7,940 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B -City of Rancho Cucamonga Prepared by NBS -Fiscal Year 2011112 The total square footage for the improvement is 15,879; however, due to the location of the improvement the other half is maintained by LMD 4-R. FH-3 The Foothill median from 790 feet west of Market Place to Market Place. Ground cover area: 4,434 square feet FH-4 The Foothill median from Market Place to Etiwanda. Ground cover area: 10,392 square feet FH-5 The Foothill median from 360 feet west of Masi Dr. to 516 feet west of Masi Dr. Ground cover area: 800 square feet The total square footage for the improvement is 1,600; however, due to the location of the improvement the other half is maintained by LMD 4-R. Map of Improvements The following page shows the map of landscaping improvements, including irrigation sites and community trails, to be maintained using District funds. Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B -City of Rancho Cucamonga Prepared by NBS -Fiscal Year 2011/12 Z~ 9~ _> ~ N 0 W M ny ePUenv13 Z V ~L (~ i+ V d ~ ^ Y A~ W ~ c o • ~ Q ~ ~ ny uaneH Q. (,~ ntl esowiaq (Q nV PIe9!Vay J ny uewpaH IS ue!lawe~ ntl ny uay!II!W m U Z ~ U~ Z~ a< ~i~ g___ 0 r - 0 2 d m a' d m m 0 0 LL J q LC a cn O N_ LL a w Z v {~ e w Z ~ Z ~ ~ O ~ O w ~ ~ U m Q W C7 w O Y w `'~ O ~ ~ ~ U o ~ w ~ ~ ~ a a ~ ~ ~ r. II , [~] o I ~ o I u i n i~.~ ise3 f/1 I V ~ sl-I 1 M 1 4 0 N { tl uaneH souuaH O lep!4~M 0 ~ uewllaH N a ~ \\\\ o~~mess $=85gauCty ~\ Cu~ES S~YeF:p€m S'u us AEI aAw~ coe~ ~cg3~.o~~ D' N m ~`~Sm€"g~Qg °g ema LL ,`-,r"-~e6 `s a-0 ~~€a e" m°Enom$a uV~~oo~U n~_mc d a '~mmsao~8o'' yam~~as~>=o-e~~QO2 ESTIMATE OF COSTS The estimated costs of administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing the improvements as described in the Plans and Specifications are summarized below. Each year, as part of the assessment district levy calculation process, the costs and expenses are reviewed and the annual costs are projected for the following fiscal year. District Budget Estimated 2011/12 Bud et Personnel Services Regular Payroll $313,880.00 Overtime Salaries 2,630.00 Part-time Salaries 53,700.00 Fringe Benefits 153.140.00 Subtotal Personnel $523,350.00 Operations and Maintenance Operations and Maintenance $59,900.00 Operations and Maintenance/Facilities 8,500.00 Vehicle Operations and Maintenance 1,500.00 Emergency Equipment and Vehicle Rental 2,000.00 Equipment Operations and Maintenance 12,000.00 Contract Services 402,340.00 Contract Services/Facilities 128,500.00 Tree Maintenance 21,850.00 Utilities Telephone Utilities 1,420.00 Water Utilities 70,750.00 Electric Utilities 35,950.00 Assessment Administration 6,170.00 General Overhead 68.990.00 Subtotal Operations and Maintenance $818,870.00 Capital Expenditures Capital Projects $30.000.00 Subtotal Capital Expenditures $30,000.00 Total Expenditure Budget $1,372,220.00 Total Estimated Assessment $977,290.00 Less Anticipated Delinquencies (39 970.00) Total Estimated Revenue $937,320.00 Plus Operating Reserve Fund Contribution 434.900.00 Total Expenditure Budget $1,372,220.00 Total Estimated Assessment $977,290.00 Total District EBU Count 2,775.5055 Actual Assessment per EBU -Fiscal Year 2011/12 $352.80 M xi m AI I n B- i r 2 /12 2.8 Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B -City of Rancho Cucamonga Prepared by NBS -Fiscal Year 2011/12 The maximum allowable assessment per EBU listed in the District budget above, is the amount which was approved in 1996/97 and subsequent District annexations. Each year, prior to the assessments being placed on the tax roll, the City will review the budget and determine the amount needed to maintain the improvements for the upcoming fiscal year. The actual assessment per EBU will be based on the estimated costs of maintenance, available fund balance and maximum allowable assessment with the goal of maintaining the improvements in a satisfactory and healthy condition. The actual assessment amount may be lower than the maximum allowable assessment; however it may not exceed the maximum unless the increase is approved by the property owners in accordance with Proposition 218. It is the intent of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to maintain an Operating Reserve which shall not exceed the estimated costs of maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or when the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The reserve balance information for the District is as follows: Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2011 Reserve Fund Balance $1,110,190.00 Operating Reserve Contribution -Fiscal Year 2011/12 (434,900.00) Ooeratina Reserve Collection -Fiscal Year 2011/12 0.00 Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2012 Reserve Fund Balance $675,290.00 Definitions of Budget Items The following definitions describe the costs and expenses included in the District Budget: Personnel Services Reoular Salaries: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all full-time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Part Time Salaries: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all part time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Fringe Benefits: This item includes the benefits available to City employees: health care, vacation, sick time, and retirement fund. Operations and Maintenance Contract Services: This item includes the contract costs of a landscape maintenance company responsible for the ongoing maintenance of the District improvements. Tree Maintenance: This item includes the contract costs attributed to maintaining the street trees and other trees throughout the District. Utilities -Water: This item includes the costs to furnish water for the landscaping within the District. Utilities -Electric: This item includes the costs to furnish electricity required for the operation and maintenance of the sprinklers and irrigation controllers. Assessment Administration: This item includes the cost to all particular departments and staff of the City, and consultants for providing the administration, coordination and management of District services, operations, and incidental expenses related to the District. This item also includes creation of an annual engineer's report, resolutions and placing the assessment amounts onto the County tax Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B -City of Rancho Cucamonga Prepared by NBS -Fiscal Year 2011/12 roll each year, along with responding to any public inquiries and future Proposition 218 balloting proceedings. General Overhead: This item includes the costs of all departments and staff of the City for providing the coordination of District services, inspections, annual bid management, responding to public concerns, public education, accounting, auditing and procedural matters associated with the District. This item also includes an allocation for general City staff time for administrative functions and systems that provide for a functional and operational assessment district within the City's administrative structure. Capital Expenditures: Capital Projects: This item includes new improvements to further enhance the level and quality of service provided within the boundaries of the District. This may include new monuments, irrigation systems, and other large improvements. Operating Reserve Collection: Operating Reserve Collection: This item includes the amount to be collected to maintain reserves to enable the City to pay for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or whenever the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The Reserve Fund contribution will continue until such a time the Reserve Fund balance is approximately one half of the annual costs. The fund may be allowed to accumulate in anticipation of any unforeseen expenses not included in the yearly maintenance costs. This may include, but is not limited to, tree replacements, repair of damaged equipment due to vandalism, storms and other similar events. Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B -City of Rancho Cucamonga 10 Prepared by NBS -Fiscal Year 2011/12 , METHOD OF ASSESSMENT General Pursuant to the 1972 Act and Article XIIID, all parcels that have a special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements and services shall be identified, and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel shall be determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of improvements. The 1972 Act, permits the establishment of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include the operation, maintenance and servicing of landscaping improvements. Section 22573 of the 1972 Act requires that maintenance assessments must be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. This Section states: "The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district maybe apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements." The determination of whether or not a lot or parcel will benefit from the improvements shall be made pursuant to the Improvement Act of 1911 (Division 7 (commencing with Section 5000) (of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California)." The 1972 Act also permits the designation of zones of benefit within any individual assessment district if "by reasons or variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive different degrees of benefit from the improvement" (Sec. 22547). Article XIIID, Section 4(a) of the California Constitution limits the amount of any assessment to the proportional special benefit conferred on the property. Article XIIID also provides that publicly owned properties must be assessed unless there is clear and convincing evidence that those properties receive no special benefit from the assessment. Exempted from the assessment would be the areas of public streets, public avenues, public lanes, public roads, public drives, public courts, public alleys, public easements and rights-of-ways, public greenbelts and public parkways. The net amount to be assessed may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels. Proposition 218, approved by the voters in November 1996, requires the City to separate general benefit from special benefit, where only special benefit is assessed. Special Benefit The maintenance and servicing of the improvements within the District (which are described in the Description of Services and Improvements Section of this report) are for the benefit of the properties within the District, and as such confer a special and direct benefit to parcels within the District by: • improving the livability, appearance, and desirability for properties within the boundaries of the District, and • ensuring that improvements do not reach a state of deterioration or disrepair so as to be materially detrimental to properties within the District, and Landscape Maintenance District No. 38 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 11 Fiscal Year 2011/12 providing beautification, shade and overall enhancement to properties within the District. The above mentioned items affect the assessed property in a way that is particular and distinct from their effect on other parcels and that real property in general and the public at large do not share. They contribute to a specific enhancement of the properties within the District. Since these improvements, including the community trails, were installed and are maintained specifically for the properties within the District; only properties within the District receive a special benefit and are assessed for said maintenance. General Benefit In addition to the special benefits received by parcels within the District, there are derivative general benefits that are conferred on parcels outside the boundaries of the District which include: • the control of dust and insect infestations, and • the visual enhancement of the area to persons or vehicles that may travel through the District. However it has been determined that these benefits are derivative and do not provide a direct benefit to parcels outside of the district that are not being assessed. Method of Assessment Each of the parcels within the District is deemed to receive special benefit from the improvements. Each parcel that has a special benefit conferred upon it as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements are identified and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel is determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of the improvements. When the District was formed in 1984, Article XIIID and Proposition 218 had not yet been passed. Upon the passage of Article XIIID and the subsequent passage of the Proposition Omnibus Implementation Act, new rules were put into place. Due to the changes in legal requirements, as property annexed to the District after the passage of the Assessment Law, the description of the method of assessment became more refined, however, the assessment per parcel has remained the same since the 1996/97 Fiscal Year. Further, no parcel included in the District formation or annexations prior to when the language was refined, are now being levied differently than they were at the time the District was formed or the parcels were annexed. To assess special benefit appropriately, it is necessary to relate the different type of parcel improvements to each other. The Equivalent Benefit Unit ("EBU") method of apportionment uses the single family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single family home equals one Equivalent Benefit Unit (EBU). Every other land-use is converted to EBUs based on an assessment formula that equates to the property's specific development status, type of development (land-use), and size of the property, as compared to a single family home. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land-use types, as assigned by County use code, to determine each parcel's EBU assignment. Land-Use E uivalent Dwellin Units Pro ert T e Coun Use Code EBU Value Multi lier Non-Residential 1.00 Acre Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B -City of Rancho Cucamonga 12 Fiscal Year 2011/12 The use of the latest County Assessor's Secured Roll shall be the basis for the Property Type determination and units/acreage assignments, unless better data is available to the City. In addition, if any parcel within the District is identified by the County Auditor/Controller to be an invalid parcel number for the current fiscal year, the Property Type and EBU assignment shall be based on the correct parcel number and/or new parcel number(s) County use code and subsequent property information. If a single parcel has changed to multiple parcels, the EBU assignment and assessment amount applied to each of the new parcels will be recalculated rather than spread the proportionate share of the original assessment. The following table summarizes the Fiscal Year 2011/12 maximum allowable assessment rates for the District: Maximum Property Type Allowable Actual (County Use Code) Assessment Rate Assessment Rate Total Total er EBU er EBU UnitslAcres EBUs Non-Residential $352.80 $352.80 2,775.55 2,775.5055 The total amount of maintenance and incidental costs for maintaining the landscaping and community trail improvements is assessed to the individual parcels of real property within the District in proportion to the special benefit received by such parcels of real property. The proposed individual assessments are shown on the assessment roll in this report. Landscape Maintenance District No. 36 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 13 Fiscal Year 2011/12 ASSESSMENT D/AGRAM An Assessment Diagram for the District is shown on the following page. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the County Assessor of the County San Bernardino, at the time this report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Engineer's Report. Landscape Maintenance District No. 38 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 14 Fiscal Year 2011/12 a~ N M ~~ V ~' '~ ~ m H.r ~ ~ ~ Q ~` Q c j = U ~ ~n 0 ~ j ny ti~ay~ ~C'l ~ ~ V i .._.._.._..-• ~ J ~•r o 1 ~ N ~, c c~ i J m ~ O _ O ~ ~ ~ " o m O ~ ~ ' a` .~ i _.._.._.._. ny;se3 in •V ~ ® L ~ i nd epuenn!;3 ny epuenn!13 ~ ~ I ~ ~8 ~aa~~ tea ~ ny as;sayoo~{ ~ j ny ~a;sayoo~{ J ,~..~ i ny ua~!II!W r'_.._.._.._.._.. ° nb' ua~l!IIlW ny uaneH ny uaneH ny esoua~aH ny esowaaH n`d Pleq!yo~`d nb' PIeQ!yo~`d ny ueuallaH ~ ny ueuallaH ~ ~ s ~ w ny p e~(au!n ;g ue!lawe~ ~a=a6:'~ f'i g _~~ ~ ~ ~, .,_, ny anal , ag ~ ~ ~~ ~ g~ ~ c m ~ ~ wbr a ~ Y ~ ~ O Q i~~€C~i~~i ~ c m u_ ~ 9g~~~s~a~~~~ a ~ ~~~~~~~~~.~~ vJ ea fiSe,is~ '€ _ pp gg sa = m ~g~S~j~~j~ tfpP ~~ne SoTf ~- ~~~p~ ~ ~tfi~ :: ~t~s~i~ a2ne ASSESSMENT ROLL Assessment Roll The assessment roll is a listing of the assessment for Fiscal Year 2011/12 apportioned to each lot or parcel, as shown on the last equalized roll of the Assessor of the County of San Bernardino. The following tables summarize the Fiscal Year 2011/12 maximum and actual assessments for the District: Maximum Allowable Maximum Property Type Assessment Rate Total Total Allowable Count Use Code er EBU UnitslAcres EBUs Assessment Non-Residential $352.80 2,775.55 2,775.5055 $977,290.00 Actual Property Type Assessment Rate Total Total Actual Count Use Code er EBU UnitslAcres EBUs Assessment Non-Residential $352.80 2,775.55 2,775.5055 $977,290.00 A copy of the full assessment roll is available for review in the City Clerk's office. Annexations The following annexations are effective for the 2011/12 Fiscal Year: Assessor's Parcel Number Annexation Date Pro'ect Total Units/Acres Total EBUs Property Type Coun Use Code Landscape Maintenance District No. 36 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 15 Fiscal Year 2011/12 Revised Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2011/2012 City of Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 4-R (Caryn Planned Community) CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 6 (CARYN PLANNED COMMUNITY) 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Phone: 909.477.2700 Fax: 909.477.2741 CITY COUNCIL L. Dennis Michael, Mayor Sam Spagnolo, Mayor Pro Tem William Alexander, Council Member Chuck Buquet, Council Member Diane Williams, Council Member CITY STAFF John R. Gillison, Assistant City Manager Linda D. Daniels, Deputy City Manager William Wittkopf, Public Works Director Ingrid Y. Bruce, GIS/Special Districts Manager Christopher Bopko, Management Analyst III TABLE OF CONTENTS ENGINEER'S LETTER 1 INTRODUCTION 3 Reason for Assessment .............................................................................................3 Process for Annual Assessment .................................................................................3 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS 5 Description of the Boundaries of the District ...............................................................5 Description of Improvements and Services ................................................................5 Map of Improvements ...............................................................................................11 ESTIMATE OF COSTS 12 District Budget ..........................................................................................................12 Definitions of Budget Items .......................................................................................13 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT 15 General ............................................................................. ........................................15 Special Benefit ................................................................. ........................................15 General Benefit ................................................................ ........................................16 Method of Assessment Spread ........................................ ........................................16 ASSESSMENT D/AGRAM ASSESSMENT ROLL 18 19 Assessment Roll .......................................................................................................19 Annexations ..............................................................................................................19 ENGINEER'S LETTER WHEREAS, on ,the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga (the "City"), under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 (the "1972 Act") adopted its Resolution No. _, a Resolution Initiating Proceedings for the Levy of Annual Assessments for Landscape Maintenance District No. 6 (Caryn Planned Community) (the "District"); and WHEREAS, the Resolution Initiating Proceedings staff prepared and filed an Engineer's Report for Fiscal Year 2011/12 pursuant to the requirements of the 1972 Act. The Engineer's Report presents the plans and specifications describing the general nature, location and extent of the improvements to be maintained, an estimate of the costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements for the District for the referenced fiscal year, a diagram for the District, showing the area and properties proposed to be assessed, and an assessment of the estimated costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing the improvements, assessing the net amount upon all assessable lots and/or parcels within the District in proportion to the special benefit received; and NOW THEREFORE, the following assessment is proposed to be authorized in order to pay the estimated costs of maintenance, operation and servicing of the improvements to be paid by the assessable real property within the boundaries of the District in proportion to the special benefit received. The following table summarizes the proposed assessment. SUMMARY OF ASSESSMENT Fiscal Year 2011/12 Total Estimated Assessment $2,451,020..00 Less Anticipated Delinquencies 72 150.00 Total Estimated Revenue $2,378,870..00 Less Reserve Fund Collection 240,130.00 Total Expenditure Budget $2,419,000.00 Total District EBU Count 4,187.00 Actual Assessment per EBU $380.00 Maximum Allowable Assessment per EBU $380.00 In making the assessments contained herein pursuant to the 1972 Act: I have identified all parcels which will have a special benefit conferred upon them from the improvements described in the Special Benefit Section of this Engineer's Report (the "Specially Benefited Parcels"). For particulars as to the identification of said parcels, reference is made to the Assessment Diagram, a copy of which is included in this Engineer's Report. 2. I have evaluated the costs and expenses of the improvements upon the Specially Benefited Parcels. In making such evaluation: Landscape Maintenance District No. 4-R -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2011/12 a. The proportionate special benefit derived by each Specially Benefited Parcel from the improvements was determined in relationship to the entirety of the maintenance costs of the improvements; b. No assessment has been imposed on any Specially Benefited Parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on such parcel from the improvements; and c. Any general benefits from the improvements have been separated from the special benefits and only special benefits have been assessed. I, the undersigned, respectfully submit the enclosed Engineer's Report and, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, the Engineer's Report, Assessments, and the Assessment Diagram herein have been prepared and computed in accordance with the order of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Assessment Law. Mark A. Steuer, City Engineer Landscape Maintenance District No. 4-R -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2011/12 INTRODUCTION Reason for Assessment Approval of the assessment covered by this Engineer's Report will generate the revenue necessary to: Provide for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements described in this Engineer's Report. Maintenance may include but is not limited to, all of the following: the repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement, providing for the life, growth, health and beauty of the landscaping, including cultivation, irrigation, trimming, spraying, fertilizing or treating for disease or injury, the removal of trimming, rubbish, debris and other solid waste, the maintenance, repair and replacement as necessary of all irrigation systems and the removal of graffiti from walls immediately adjacent to the cultivated areas. Servicing means the furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operating and servicing of any improvement. Servicing shall also include vehicle, equipment, capital improvements and administrative costs associated with the annual administration and operation of the District. Process for Annual Assessment The City cannot levy and collect annual assessments within the District without complying with the procedures specified in the 1972 Act. On an annual basis, an Engineer's Report must be prepared which contains a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the district. The City Council must also adopt a resolution of intention which: • Declares the intention of the City Council to levy and collect assessments within the assessment district for the fiscal year stated therein. • Generally describes the existing and proposed improvements and any substantial changes proposed to be made in existing improvements. • Refers to the assessment district by its distinctive designation and indicate the general location of the district. • Refers to the report of the engineer, on file with the clerk, for a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the district. • Gives notice of the time and place for public hearing by the City Council on the levy of the proposed assessment. • States whether the assessment is proposed to increase from the previous year. If the assessments are to be levied in the same or lesser amounts than the maximum assessment amount approved, the clerk shall give notice by causing the resolution of intention to be published. Any interested person may, prior to the conclusion of the public hearing, file a written protest which shall state all grounds of objection. The protest shall contain a description sufficient to identify the property owned by the property owner filing the protest. During the course or upon conclusion of the hearing, the City Council may order changes in any of the matters provided in the report, including changes in the improvements, any zones within the assessment district, and the proposed diagram or the proposed assessment. The City Council, upon conclusion of the public hearing must then adopt a resolution confirming the diagram and assessment, either as originally proposed or as changed by it. The adoption of the resolution shall constitute the levy of an assessment for the fiscal year referred to in the assessment. Landscape Maintenance District No. 4-R -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2011/12 If the assessment to be levied exceeds the maximum assessment amount previously approved, the City must comply with the procedures specified in Article XIII D and Proposition 218. The voters in the State of California in November 1996 added Article XIII D to the California Constitution imposing, among other requirements, the necessity for the City to conduct an assessment ballot procedure to enable the owners of each property on which assessments are proposed to be enacted or increased, the opportunity to express their support for, or opposition to the proposed assessment or increase in such assessment. The basic steps of the assessment ballot procedure are outlined below. The City must prepare a Notice of Public Hearing ("Notice"), which describes, along with other mandated information, the reason for the proposed assessments, and to provide a date and time of a public hearing to be held on the matter. The City must also prepare an assessment ballot, which clearly gives the property owner the ability to sign and mark their assessment ballot either in favor of, or in opposition to the proposed assessment. The Notice and assessment ballot are mailed to each affected property owner within the District a minimum of 45 days prior to the public hearing date as shown in the Notice. The City may also hold community meetings with the property owners to discuss the issues facing the District and to answer property owner questions directly. After the Notice and assessment ballot are mailed, property owners are given until the close of the public hearing, stated in the Notice, to return their signed and marked assessment ballot. During the public hearing, property owners are given the opportunity to address the City Council and ask questions or voice their concerns. At the public hearing, the returned assessment ballots received prior to the close of the public hearing are tabulated, weighted by the proposed assessment amount on each property and the results are announced by the City Council. Article XIII D provides that if, as a result of the assessment ballot proceeding, a majority protest is found to exist, the City Council shall not have the authority to levy and collect the assessments as proposed. A majority protest exists if the assessments represented by ballots submitted in opposition exceed those submitted in favor of the assessment. All returned ballots are tabulated and weighted according to the financial obligation of each particular parcel. If there is no majority protest as described above, the City Council may approve the proposed assessments. If there is a majority protest, as described above, the City will not levy and collect any assessments. Landscape Maintenance District No. 4-R -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2011/12 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS The District provides for the administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing of various improvements located within the public right-of-way and dedicated easements within the boundaries of the District. tion of the Boundaries of the District The District is located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California. The boundaries of the District are generally described as that area located north of Foothill Boulevard, west of Rochester Avenue, east of Haven Avenue, south of Base Line Road and includes the northeast corner of Base Line Road and Haven Avenue. Reference is also made to the Assessment Diagram included in this Report. Description of Improvements and Services The improvements are the maintenance and servicing of the paseos, parkways, median islands, street trees, parks, landscaped sites and appurtenant facilities that are throughout the Terra Vista Planned Community. These improvements are located within the street right-of-ways, dedicated public easements and parks which are within the boundaries of the District. The landscaping maintenance includes, but is not limited to, the pruning, fertilizing, mowing, weeding, pest control, removal of trash/debris, and irrigation of the trees, shrubs, vines, ground cover, and turf. Maintenance of associated improvements, including the parks and irrigation systems, includes but is not limited to, grading and replacement of trail surfacing, trail fence repair and replacement, and irrigation systems control, adjustment, repair and replacement. Services include personnel, materials, contracting services, utilities, and all necessary costs associated with the maintenance, replacement and repair required to keep the improvements in a healthy, vigorous and satisfactory condition. The 38 acres of parks consist of Spruce Park, Mountain View Park, Ralph M. Lewis Park, Coyote Canyon Park, Milliken Park and West Greenway Park. In addition, it is the City's intention to continue to use cost effective materials, including the future ability to replace landscaping with drought resistant or low water use plants, in order to lower expenses of the District. The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows: The street trees within the residential parkways and tree maintenance easements to be maintained by the District are on the following streets, located within the boundaries of the District: Amiata Dr Bastia Ct Blackhorse Ct Brandywine PI Bunkerhill Dr Cedarbrook PI Chesterton Dr Claridge PI Clarisa PI Corsica Ct (Countryview to Milliken) Countryview (Mt. View to Palacio) Covington PI Danbury Dr DannerCt De Anza Dr Derby PI Downing Ct Ellena Wy (s/o Terra Vista to Fitzpatrick) Emery PI Fitzpatrick Dr Fulbourn Ct Hinton Ct Linaro Rd Meyers Dr Potomac Ct Radcliff PI Regent Dr Rockingham Ct Sarzanza PI Southhampton Ct Terra Vista Pky (Church to Brandywine) Wellington PI Yorktown Ct Landscape Maintenance District No. 4-R -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2011/12 The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows: Site # Descriptive Location N-1 The Base Line median from Haven to the Deer Creek Channel. Ground Cover area: 16,613 square feet Turf area: 19,030 square feet Hardscape area: 23,650 square feet Due to the location of the improvements, an additional 2,769 square feet of ground cover area and 1,478 square feet of turf area of the median are maintained by the City, however that portion is not funded by the District and instead funded by the City's General Fund. N-2 The Base Line median from Spruce to the Deer Creek Channel. Ground Cover area: 13,504 square feet Turf area: 16,109 square feet Hardscape area: 12,575 square feet Due to the location of the improvements, an additional 2,749 square feet of ground cover area and 1,598 square feet of turf area of the median are maintained by the City, however that portion is not funded by the District and instead funded by the City's General Fund. TV-3 The Base Line median from Spruce to Milliken. Ground Cover area: 8,418 square feet Turt area: 13,573 square feet Hardscape area: 16,567 square feet Due to the location of the improvements, an additional 5,247 square feet of ground cover area and 4,289 square feet of turf area of the median are maintained by the City, however that portion is not funded by the District and instead funded by the City's General Fund. N-4 The south side of Base Line from 800 feet east of Spruce to Milliken. The cul-de-sac at the north end of Cascade. Ground Cover area: 9,278 square feet Turt area: 12,659 square feet Hardscape area: 7,950 square feet N-5 The north side of Terra Vista Parkway from Belpine to 112 feet west of Buttertield; Terra Vista Parkway median from Spruce to Milliken and the south side of Terra Vista Parkway from 164 feet west of Belpine to Belpine. Ground Cover area: 13,411 square feet Turf area: 6,555 square feet Hardscape area: 12,978 square feet N-6 The north side•of Terra Vista Parkway from Spruce to 175 feet north of Countryside and Terra Vista Parkway median from Church to Spruce. Ground Cover area: 17,991 square feet Turf area: 11,413 square feet Hardscape area: 11,452 square feet N-7 The north side of Church from the Deer Creek Channel to Terra Vista Parkway. The west side of Terra Vista Parkway from Church to 175 feet north of Countryside. Ground Cover area: 9,924 square feet Turf area: 5,378 square feet Hardscape area: 6,426 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 4-R -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2011/12 N-8 The southeast corner of Church and Haven; the Church median from Haven to Terra Vista Parkway and the wash end on the Northwest corner of the Deer Creek Channel and Church. Ground Cover area: 26,876 square feet Turf area: 2,306 square feet Hardscape area: 2,788 square feet N-9 The Church median from Terra Vista Parkway to Elm. Ground Cover area: 7,829 square feet Hardscape area: 6,605 square feet N-10 The east side of Valencia from Base Line to the pre-school; the south side of Augusta from Valencia to Meadow Lark and the west side of Summerfield from Valencia to Evergreen. Ground Cover area: 20,818 square feet Turf area: 18,634 square feet Hardscape area: 8,666 square feet N-11 The paseo at Parkside and Clover from Parkside to the Deer Creek Channel. Ground Cover area: 2,795 square feet Hardscape area: 1,049 square feet N-12 The east side of Haven from the pre-school to the Southern Pacific Railroad. Ground Cover area: 6,170 square feet Turt area: 2,091 square feet Hardscape area: 1,060 square feet N-13 The east side of Spruce from Elm to Mountain View; the north and south sides of Norfolk from Spruce to Cardiff; the south side of Mountain View from Spruce to 290 feet east of Belvedere and the paseo from Spruce to Countryview. Ground Cover area: 8,459 square feet Turt area: 3,355 square feet Hardscape area: 8,886 square feet N-14 The south side of Mountain View from 290 feet east of Belvedere to 590 feet east of Fairhaven; the paseo south of Mountain View between Belvedere and Fairhaven to Country View and from Countryview Drive to West Greenway Corridor. Ground Cover area: 19,030 square feet Turt area: 8,430 square feet Hardscape area: 9,262 square feet N-15 The north side of Mountain View from 634 feet west of Biarritr to Milliken. Ground Cover area: 4,571 square feet Turt area: 4,738 square feet Hardscape area: 5,104 square feet N-16 The west Greenway Corridor from the northeast corner of Elm and Spruce to West Greenway. Ground Cover area: 15,529 square feet Turf area: 20,884 square feet Hardscape area: 20,626 square feet N-17 The west side of Milliken from 585 feet north of Mountain View to Mountain View. Ground Cover area: 5,835 square feet Turt area: 3,564 square feet Hardscape area: 2,340 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 4-R -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2011 /12 N-18 The south side of Mountain View from approximately 250 feet west of Claridge to Terra Vista Parkway. The south side of Terra Vista Parkway from Mountain View to East Greenway Corridor. Terra Vista Parkway from Mountain View to East Greenway Corridor. Ground Cover area: 18,316 square feet Turt area: 5,944 square feet Hardscape area: 23,800 square feet N-19 The Terra Vista Parkway median from Milliken to Mountain View. The north side of Terra Vista Parkway from 68 feet north of Addison to Mountain View. The west side of Mountain View from Grapevine to Terra Vista Parkway. Ground Cover area: 20,306 square feet Turf area: 3,886 square feet Hardscape area: 11,478 square feet N-20 The Church median from Milliken to 675 feet east of Milliken. Ground Cover area: 2,860 square feet Hardscape area: 2,112 square feet N-21 The Church median from Milliken to Spruce. Ground Cover area: 16,811 square feet Turt area: 335 square feet Hardscape area: 14,880 square feet N-22 The Milliken median from Mountain View to Foothill. Ground Cover area: 16,436 square feet Hardscape area: 16,267 square feet N-23 The Milliken underpass from West Greenway Park to Milliken Park. Ground Cover area: 19,271 square feet Turf area: 22,139 square feet Hardscape area: 18,119 square feet N-24 The east side of Haven from 145 feet south of Creekbridge to 600 feet north of Creekbridge; the north side of Creekbridge from Brookside to Haven and the paseo from Creekbridge and Brookside to the Deer Creek Channel. Ground Cover area: 5,851 square feet Turf area: 9,965 square feet Hardscape area: 4,351 square feet N-25 The east side of Haven from 145 feet south of Creekbridge to 410 feet south of Creekbridge. Ground Cover area: 3,319 square feet Turf area: 1,677 square feet Hardscape area: 1,779 square feet N-26 The paseo at Plymouth south of Essex from Plymouth to the Deer Creek Channel. Ground Cover area: 1,956 square feet Hardscape area: 2,385 square feet N-27 The paseo from Terra Vista Parkway to Windsong and from Windsong to Plymouth. Ground Cover area: 2,270 square feet Turf area: 2,731 square feet Hardscape area: 3,332 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 4-R -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2011/12 TV-28 The paseo at 7552 Hardy. Ground Cover area: 630 square feet Turf area: 733 square feet Hardscape area: 432 square feet TV-29 The East Greenway Corridor from Milliken Park to Terra Vista Parkway, including the turf area at the entrance to Tract 16157. Ground Cover area: 17,780 square feet Turf area: 52,403 square feet Hardscape area: 29,888 square feet TV-30 The Milliken Median from Mountain View to Base Line. Ground Cover area: 11,890 square feet Hardscape area: 10,260 square feet TV-31 The paseo from Elm to West Greenway Park. Ground Cover area: 4,770 square feet Hardscape area: 8,900 square feet TV-32 The Greenwich paseo from Greenwich to Muirfield. Ground Cover area: 1,323 square feet Hardscape area: 1,456 square feet TV-33 The south side of Mountain View from 430 feet west of Country View to Country View. Ground Cover area: 3,434 square feet Turf area: 1,853 square feet Hardscape area: 1,720 square feet TV-34 The south side of Terra Vista Parkway from 390 feet west of Belpine to Belpine. Ground Cover area: 1,342 square feet Turf area: 1,887 square feet Hardscape area: 1,612 square feet TV-35 The Trail Northeast of Ruth Musser School from Terra Vista Parkway to Spruce. Ground Cover area: 9,285 square feet Hardscape area: 5,148 square feet TV-36 The north side Meyers from Emery Place to Elm. Ground Cover area: 9,141 square feet Turf area: 5,895 square feet Hardscape area: 6,058 square feet TV-37 The north side of Meyers from Emery Place to Elm. Ground Cover area: 5,860 square feet Turf area: 5,300 square feet Hardscape area: 1,283 square feet TV-38 The Church median from Rochester to Terra Vista Parkway median from Church to 853 north of Church. Ground Cover area: 8,510 square feet Hardscape area: 5,640 square feet TV-39 The north side of Mountain View from 250 feet east of Milliken to Milliken. The eastside of Milliken from Mountain View to Terra Vista Parkway. Ground Cover area: 16,751 square feet Hardscape area: 15,716 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 4-R -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2011/12 N-40 The south side of Terra Vista Parkway from Milliken to Mountain View. Ground Cover area: 11,630 square feet Hardscape area: 19,738 square feet TV-41 The south side of Terra Vista Parkway from Milliken to Mountain View. Ground Cover area: 4,081 square feet Hardscape area: 9,640 square feet N-42 The north side of Mountain View from Terra Vista Parkway to 250 feet east of Milliken. Ground Cover area: 10,994 square feet Hardscape area: 14,777 square feet N-43 Church median and parkway from Malaga to Terra Vista Parkway. Ground Cover area: 7,506 square feet Hardscape area: 3,955 square feet N-44 The south side of Church from Terra Vista Parkway to Rochester. Ground Cover area: 10,400 square feet Hardscape area: 7,606 square feet N-45 The west side of Rochester from Church to Malaga. Ground Cover area: 20,693 square feet Hardscape area: 12,450 square feet N-46 The north side of Malaga from Church to Rochester. Ground Cover area: 19,843 square feet Hardscape area: 18,000 square feet N-47 The eastside of Terra Vista Parkway from Church to Brandywine. The paseo from Brandywine to Bunker Hill Drive. The eastside of Radcliff from Bunker to Malada. Ground Cover area: 17,838 square feet Hardscape area: 9,023 square feet N-48 The Church median from 750 feet east of Milliken to Malaga Ave. Ground Cover area: 5,554 square feet Hardscape area: 9,698 square feet FH-1 The Foothill median from Spruce to Haven. Ground Cover area: 4,571 square feet The total square footage for the improvement is 9,141; however, due to the location of the improvement the other half is maintained by LMD 36. FH-2 The Foothill median from Spruce to Milliken. Ground Cover area: 7,940 square feet The total square footage for the improvement is 15,879; however, due to the location of the improvement the other half is maintained by LMD 3B. FH-5 The Foothill median from 360 feet west of Masi Dr. to 516 feet west of Masi Dr. Ground Cover area: 800 square feet The total square footage for the improvement is 1,600; however, due to the location of the improvement the other half is maintained by LMD 3B. H-5 The Haven median from Foothill to Church. Ground Cover area: 6,216 square feet Turt area: 5,286 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 4-R -City of Rancho Cucamonga 10 Fiscal Year 2011/12 The total square footage for the Ground Cover improvement is 12,432 and the Turt improvement square footage is 10,572; however, due to the location of the improvements the other half is maintained by LMD 36. H-6 Haven median from Church to Baseline. Ground Cover area: 5,306 square feet Turt area: 4,354 square feet The total square footage for the Ground Cover improvement is 10,612 and the Turf improvement square footage is 8,708; however, due to the location of the improvements the other half is maintained by LMD 36 H-7 The Haven median from Baseline to Southern Pacific railroad tracks. Ground Cover area: 2,980 square feet Turf area: 1,996 square feet The total square footage for the Ground Cover improvement is 5,960 and the Turf improvement square footage is 3,992; however, due to the location of the improvements the other half is maintained by LMD 36. VG-14 The Baseline median from Milliken to Ellena East. The turf and ground cover on the north side of Baseline from Ellena East to Ellena West. The turf and ground cover on the east side of Ellena West from Baseline and following the curb line to Kenyon. The north side of Ellena West from Kenyon to Casoli. The turt and ground cover on both sides of Casoli from Ellena West to Candela. The turf and ground cover on both sides of Crema Place from Ellena west to Candela. Ground Cover area: 9,169 square feet The total square footage for the Ground Cover improvements are 80,287, 62,999 square feet for Turf and 44,826 square feet for Hardscape; however, due to the location of the improvements, LMD 4-R maintains only the south side of the Base Line median from Milliken to Ellena East and the rest is maintained by LMD 2. VG-15 The turt and ground cover on the west side of Rochester from the Southern Pacific Railroad to Baseline. The turf and ground cover on the north side of Baseline from Rochester to Ellena East. The Baseline Median from Rochester to Ellena East. The turf and ground cover on the east side of Ellena east from Baseline and continuing along that curb line to 275 feet north of Berra Road. The turt and ground cover on both sides of Berra from Ellena East to Comiso. Ground Cover area: 3,960 square feet The total square footage for the Ground Cover improvements are 58,5887, 57,306 square feet for Turf and 36,014 square feet for Hardscape; however, due to the location of the improvements, LMD 4-R maintains only the south side of the Base Line median from Rochester to Ellena East and the rest is maintained by LMD 2. Map of Improvements The following page shows the map of landscaping improvements, including irrigation sites and community trails, to be maintained using District funds. Landscape Maintenance District No. 4-R -City of Rancho Cucamonga 11 Fiscal Year 2011/12 O 1 O p a O O w a ? w w /~t12J31S3HJ021 O J O ~ Q H fQ w (7 ~ (7 Y Q O W d' O W J U g K L 3 ~ d ~ d ~ ~ LL 0° 11011 d V~ D ; Z y W ~ ~ d w Z Y K ~ Q Z Q. ~ Ow 1 ~ j ~ e T 0 z ,m, w ~ ~ Z W y y K ~ ~ ~ N U • O O ~ oC Z ~ w nV N3NIllIW U eo ~ a~i ' w W z J Q Q ~ W ~ Q w Y w ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ¢ m Q c~~ a ~ al s u, l(7 O C~ O Q Q ~ ~ Y 1 is `' ~' Q a J '.•J (Y b ~ ~? Z 1' H :J :•) J J In N ~ O O ~ O LL ~ CV ^, ~/7 m L CC o ~ g} qE~ ~ 0 C ~~~ i a~ a • ~ 0 ' ~ O p ~@oe~o85 EV _mb°g uE E~PagngBm~~mgEA`--_ ~ 1 i CcimE~L~ ~n.~s~cg~o cL C_`o 5g~ ~~,~nn U=~e~ ~doYm ~ ~ %~ ; ~omEcm~`'~m mm ~'o~c tU~g3~ < 9g m;~€~o~ • , r Q a s~y g o_ r m c~~ $pp ~~ c C ~~ E" o 0 0 `o c~ d E u me ` c o ~ _! o ~,BKmmco~'rc ''$ °~E'pE ~ ~ ~a~F~datg ~'~~'~~ W~''E°m Emoc>~ ~ ~Ug°~W ~ ~ ~im~~~~gg~oa~~G~ ~ O nbr N3nb'H ~ ; Q ESTIMATE OF COSTS The estimated costs of administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing the improvements as described in the Plans and Specifications are summarized below. Each year, as part of the assessment district levy calculation process, the costs and expenses are reviewed and the annual costs are projected for the following fiscal year. District Budget Estimated 2011/12 Bud et Personnel Services Regular Payroll $595,920.00 Overtime Salaries 1,050.00 Part-time Salaries 32,280.00 Fringe Benefits 282.680.00 Subtotal Personnel $911,930.00 Operations and Maintenance Operations and Maintenance $67,150.00 Vehicle Operations and Maintenance 6,000.00 Equip Operations & Maint 3,750.00 Depreciation -Computer Equip 150.00 Contract Services 367,690.00 Contract Services/Facilities 0.00 Tree Maintenance 10,180.00 Utilities Water Utilities 249,730.00 Electric Utilities 33,960.00 Assessment Administration 23,010.00 General Overhead 177.110.00 Subtotal Operations and Maintenance $941,490.00 Capital Expenditures Capital Outlay -Vehicles 10,780.00 Caoital Projects $555.000.00 Subtotal Capital Expenditures $565,780.00 Total District Expenditure Budget $2,419,000.00 Total Estimated Assessment $2451,020.00 Less Anticipated Delinquencies (72.150.001 Total Estimated Revenues $2,378,870.00 Less Operating Reserve Fund Collection (240,130.00) Total Expenditure Budget $2,419,000.00 Total Estimated Assessment $2,451,020.00 Total District EBU Count 4187.00 Actual Assessment per EBU -Fiscal Year 2011/12 $380.00 Maximum Allowable Assessment er EBU -Fiscal Year 2011/12 $380.00 Landscape Maintenance District No. 4-R -City of Rancho Cucamonga 12 Fiscal Year 2011/12 The maximum allowable assessment per EBU listed in the District budget above, is the amount which was approved in 1996/97 and subsequent District annexations. Each year, prior to the assessments being placed on the tax roll, the City will review the budget and determine the amount needed to maintain the improvements for the upcoming fiscal year. The actual assessment per EBU will be based on the estimated costs of maintenance, available fund balance and maximum allowable assessment with the goal of maintaining the improvements in a satisfactory and healthy condition. The actual assessment amount may be lower than the maximum allowable assessment; however it may not exceed the maximum unless the increase is approved by the property owners in accordance with Proposition 218. It is the intent of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to maintain an Operating Reserve which shall not exceed the estimated costs of maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or when the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The reserve balance information for the District is as follows: Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2011 Reserve Fund Balance $2,009,670.00 Operating Reserve Contribution -Fiscal Year 2011/12 0.00 Operating Reserve Collection -Fiscal Year 2011/12 40,130.00 Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2012 Reserve Fund Balance $1,954,650.00 Definitions of Budget Items The following definitions describe the costs and expenses included in the District Budget: Personnel Services Regular Salaries: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all full-time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Part Time Salaries: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all part time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Fringe Benefits: This item includes the benefits available to City employees: health care, vacation, sick time, and retirement fund. Operations and Maintenance Contract Services: This item includes the contract costs of a landscape maintenance company responsible for the ongoing maintenance of the District improvements. Tree Maintenance: This item includes the contract costs attributed to maintaining the street trees and other trees throughout the District. Utilities -Water: This item includes the costs to furnish water for the landscaping within the District. Utilities -Electric: This item includes the costs to furnish electricity required for the operation and maintenance of the sprinklers and irrigation controllers. Assessment Administration: This item includes the cost to all particular departments and staff of the City, and consultants for providing the administration, coordination and management of District services, operations, and incidental expenses related to the District. This item also includes creation of an annual engineer's report, resolutions and placing the assessment amounts onto the County tax Landscape Maintenance District No. 4-R -City of Rancho Cucamonga 13 Fiscal Year 2011 /12 roll each year, along with responding to any public inquiries and future Proposition 218 balloting proceedings. General Overhead: This item includes the costs of all departments and staff of the City for providing the coordination of District services, inspections, annual bid management, responding to public concerns, public education, accounting, auditing and procedural matters associated with the District. This item also includes an allocation for general City staff time for administrative functions and systems that provide for a functional and operational assessment district within the City's administrative structure. Capital Expenditures: Capital Projects: This item includes new improvements to further enhance the level and quality of service provided within the boundaries of the District. This may include new monuments, irrigation systems, and other large improvements. Operating Reserve Collection: Operating Reserve Collection: This item includes the amount to be collected to maintain reserves to enable the City to pay for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or whenever the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The Reserve Fund contribution will continue until such a time the Reserve Fund balance is approximately one half of the annual costs. The fund may be allowed to accumulate in anticipation of any unforeseen expenses not included in the yearly maintenance costs. This may include, but is not limited to, tree replacements, repair of damaged equipment due to vandalism, storms and other similar events. Landscape Maintenance District No. 4-R -City of Rancho Cucamonga 14 Fiscal Year 2011 /12 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT General Pursuant to the 1972 Act and Article XIII D, all parcels that have a special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements and services shall be identified, and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel shall be determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of improvements. The 1972 Act, permits the establishment of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include the operation, maintenance and servicing of landscaping improvements. Section 22573 of the 1972 Act requires that maintenance assessments must be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. This Section states: "The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district maybe apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements." The determination of whether or not a lot or parcel will benefit from the improvements shall be made pursuant to the Improvement Act of 1911 (Division 7 (commencing with Secfion 5000) (of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California)." The 1972 Act also permits the designation of zones of benefit within any individual assessment district if "by reasons or variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive different degrees of benefit from the improvement" (Sec. 22547). Article XIII D, Section 4(a) of the California Constitution limits the amount of any assessment to the proportional special benefit conferred on the property. Article XIII D also provides that publicly owned properties must be assessed unless there is clear and convincing evidence that those properties receive no special benefit from the assessment. Exempted from the assessment would be the areas of public streets, public avenues, public lanes, public roads, public drives, public courts, public alleys, public easements and rights-of-ways, public greenbelts and public parkways. The net amount to be assessed may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels. Proposition 218, approved by the voters in November 1996, requires the City to separate general benefit from special benefit, where only special benefit is assessed. Benefit The maintenance and servicing of the improvements within the District (which are described in the Description of Improvements and Services Section of this report) are for the benefit of the properties within the District, and as such confer a special and direct benefit to parcels within the District by: • improving the livability, appearance, and desirability for properties within the boundaries of the District, and • ensuring that improvements do not reach a state of deterioration or disrepair so as to be materially detrimental to properties within the District, and Landscape Maintenance District No. 4-R -City of Rancho Cucamonga 15 Fiscal Year 2011 /12 • providing beautification, shade and overall enhancement to properties within the District. The above mentioned items affect the assessed property in a way that is particular and distinct from their effect on other parcels and that real property in general and the public at large do not share. They contribute to a specific enhancement of the properties within the District. Since these improvements, including the community trails, were installed and are maintained specifically for the properties within the District; only properties within the District receive a special benefit and are assessed for said maintenance. General Benefit In addition to the special benefits received by parcels within the District, there are derivative general benefits that are conferred on parcels outside the boundaries of the District which include: • the control of dust and insect infestations, and • the visual enhancement of the area to persons or vehicles that may travel through the District. However it has been determined that these benefits are derivative and do not provide a direct benefit to parcels outside of the district that are not being assessed. Method of Assessment Each of the parcels within the District is deemed to receive special benefit from the improvements. Each parcel that has a special benefit conferred upon it as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements are identified and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel is determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of the improvements. When the District was formed in 1984, Article XIII D and Proposition 218 had not yet been passed. Upon the passage of Article XIII D and the subsequent passage of the Proposition Omnibus Implementation Act, new rules were put into place. Due to the changes in legal requirements, as property annexed to the District after the passage of the Assessment Law, the description of the method of assessment became more refined, however, the assessment per parcel has remained the same since the 1996/97 Fiscal Year. Further, no parcel included in the District formation or annexations prior to when the language was refined, are now being levied differently than they were at the time the District was formed or the parcels were annexed. To assess special benefit appropriately, it is necessary to relate the different type of parcel improvements to each other. The Equivalent Benefit Unit ("EBU") method of apportionment uses the single family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single family home equals one Equivalent Benefit Unit (EBU). Every other land-use is converted to EBUs based on an assessment formula that equates to the property's specific development status, type of development (land-use), and size of the property, as compared to a single family home. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land-use types, as assigned by County use code, to determine each parcel's EBU assignment. Land-Use Equivalent Dwelling Units Pro ert T e Count Use Code EBU Value Multi tier Single Family Residential 1.00 Dwelling Unit Landscape Maintenance District No. 4-R -City of Rancho Cucamonga 16 Fiscal Year 2011/12 The use of the latest County Assessor's Secured Roll shall be the basis for the Property Type determination and units/acreage assignments, unless better data is available to the City. In addition, if any parcel within the District is identified by the County Auditor/Controller to be an invalid parcel number for the current fiscal year, the Property Type and EBU assignment shall be based on the correct parcel number and/or new parcel number(s) County use code and subsequent property information. If a single parcel has changed to multiple parcels, the EBU assignment and assessment amount applied to each of the new parcels will be recalculated rather than spread the proportionate share of the original assessment. The following table summarizes the Fiscal Year 2011112 maximum allowable assessment rates for the District: Maximum Allowable Property Type Assessment Rate Actual Assessment Total Total (County Use Code) er EBU Rate per EBU Units/Acres EBUs Single Family Residential $246.97 $246.97 1,276 1,276 The total amount of maintenance and incidental costs for maintaining the landscaping and community trail improvements is assessed to the individual parcels of real property within the District in proportion to the special benefit received by such parcels of real property. The proposed individual assessments are shown on the assessment roll in this report. Landscape Maintenance District No. 4-R -City of Rancho Cucamonga 17 Fiscal Year 2011/12 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM An Assessment Diagram for the District is shown on the following page. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the County Assessor of the County San Bernardino, at the time this report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Engineer's Report. Landscape Maintenance District No. 4-R -City of Rancho Cucamonga 18 Fiscal Year 2011/12 1 w N •_ ~ •= i ~} Q J Q C > y Q `~ nylway~ ~ U ~ o ~ ~ t. ~ ~._.._.._.._.. ~ y ~ r ~ u> ~ J o ~ i ~ c _ /~ / •Y I J m ~ ~ j N ~+ ~ r 3 ~ m 0 0 `6+ ! ~i Q i i i v my epueM!;3 ny epuenn!l3 G1 i Q i V ~g ~aa~~ ep .-..-.._.._.._ .._.._.i ny ~a;sa yaoa ny ~a;sayoob J ~ ~~ ny ua~!II!w ~-.._.._.._.._ ny ua~!II!W i i i n uane y H , ny uaneH i i o ny es wiaH ~ ny esow~aH i nV PIe9!4o~V nb' PIeQ!yo~V i ny uewllaH ~ ~ '~ ny uewllaH ~ i ~ .~'' L L ~ 1 ny p e~au !n 3S ue!lawe~ i ~s€°€F'~~:aE fi 1 I..I gpe€ g?, ~_ g g~p£;$FS 3s ¢8 .. a nyana~ sale,-b_gP L. ,I'~, N C _ m ~ UJ [~Ea~.'~te QS ~ ~ ~ f0 O Q €lea8 •'g'49~e " 0' C CD LL €E=eslsEsl i N " T l;~:f€E,p~~ = O y C m g €ax €I.g 9~' ~~ee 13Et e, U =_ m go,~l¢eP ~q~si ~ L p0 z ~ ,'F~'aF S 3'm EB ~i 6~£ `%BY:;gpfa ASSESSMENT ROLL Assessment Roll The assessment roll is a listing of the assessment for Fiscal Year 2011/12 apportioned to each lot or parcel, as shown on the last equalized roll of the Assessor of the County of San Bernardino. The following tables summarize the Fiscal Year 2011/12 maximum and actual assessments for the District: Maximum Allowable Maximum Property Type Assessment Rate Total Total Allowable Count Use Code er EBU Units/Acres EBUs Assessment Single Family Residential $380.00 4,817 $2,451,020.00 Actual Property Type Assessment Rate Total Total Actual Count Use Code er EBU Units/Acres EBUs Assessment Single Family Residential $380.00 4817 $2,451,020.00 A copy of the full assessment roll is available for review in the City Clerk's office. Annexations There were no annexations effective for the 2011 /12 Fiscal Year: Landscape Maintenance District No. 4-R -City of Rancho Cucamonga 19 Fiscal Year 2011/12 Revised Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2011/2012 City of Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 (Tot Lot) CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 5 (TOT LOT) 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Phone: 909.477.2740 Fax: 909.477.2741 CITY COUNCIL L. Dennis Michael, Mayor Sam Spagnolo, Mayor Pro Tem William Alexander, Council Member Chuck Buquet, Council Member Diane Williams, Council Member CITY STAFF John R. Gillison, Assistant City Manager Linda D. Daniels, Deputy City Manager William Wittkopf, Public Works Director Ingrid Y. Bruce, GIS/Special Districts Manager Christopher Bopko, Management Analyst III TABLE OF CONTENTS ENGINEER'S LETTER INTRODUCTION 1 3 Reason for Assessment .............................................................................................3 Process for Annual Assessment .................................................................................3 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS 5 Description of the Boundaries of the District ...............................................................5 Description of Improvements and Services ................................................................5 Map of Improvements .................................................................................................5 ESTIMATE OF COSTS 6 District Budget ............................................................................................................6 Definitions of Budget Items .........................................................................................7 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT 9 General .......................................................................................................................9 Special Benefit ...........................................................................................................9 General Benefit ........................................................................................................10 Method of Assessment Spread ................................................................................10 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM ASSESSMENT ROLL 12 13 Assessment Roll .......................................................................................................13 Annexations ..............................................................................................................13 ENGINEER'S LETTER WHEREAS, on ,the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga (the "City"), under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 (the "1972 Act") adopted its Resolution No. _, a Resolution Initiating Proceedings for the Levy of Annual Assessments for Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 (Tot Lot) (the "District"); and WHEREAS, the Resolution Initiating Proceedings directed NBS to prepare and file an Engineer's Report for Fiscal Year 2011/12 pursuant to the requirements of the 1972 Act. The Engineer's Report presents the plans and specifications describing the general nature, location and extent of the improvements to be maintained, an estimate of the costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements for the District for the referenced fiscal year, a diagram for the District, showing the area and properties proposed to be assessed, and an assessment of the estimated costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing the improvements, assessing the net amount upon all assessable lots and/or parcels within the District in proportion to the special benefit received; and NOW THEREFORE, the following assessment is proposed to be authorized in order to pay the estimated costs of maintenance, operation and servicing of the improvements to be paid by the assessable real property within the boundaries of the District in proportion to the special benefit received. The following table summarizes the proposed assessment. SUMMARY OF ASSESSMENT Fiscal Year 2011/12 Total Estimated Assessment $4,984.76 Plus Anticipated Delinquency Penalty 1 045.24 Total Estimated Revenue $6,030.00 Plus Reserve Fund Contribution 1 970.00 Total Expenditure Budget $4,060.00 Total District EBU Count 44.00 Actual Assessment per EBU $113.29 Maximum Allowable Assessment per EBU $113.29 In making the assessments contained herein pursuant to the 1972 Act: I have identified all parcels which will have a special benefit conferred upon them from the improvements described in the Special Benefit Section of this Engineer's Report (the "Specially Benefited Parcels"). For particulars as to the identification of said parcels, reference is made to the Assessment Diagram, a copy of which is included in this Engineer's Report. 2. I have evaluated the costs and expenses of the improvements upon the Specially Benefited Parcels. In making such evaluation: Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2011/12 a. The proportionate special benefit derived by each Specially Benefited Parcel from the improvements was determined in relationship to the entirety of the maintenance costs of the improvements; b. No assessment has been imposed on any Specially Benefited Parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on such parcel from the improvements; and c. Any general benefits from the improvements have been separated from the special benefits and only special benefits have been assessed. I, the undersigned, respectfully submit the enclosed Engineer's Report and, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, the Engineer's Report, Assessments, and the Assessment Diagram herein have been prepared and computed in accordance with the order of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Assessment Law. ry v ~ Mark A. Steuer, City Engin e~ Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2011 /12 INTRODUCTION Reason for Assessment Approval of the assessment covered by this Engineer's Report will generate the revenue necessary to: Provide for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements described in this Engineer's Report. Maintenance may include but is not limited to, all of the following: the repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement, providing for the life, growth, health and beauty of the landscaping, including cultivation, irrigation, trimming, spraying, fertilizing or treating for disease or injury, the removal of trimming, rubbish, debris and other solid waste, the maintenance, repair and replacement as necessary of all irrigation systems and the removal of graffiti from walls immediately adjacent to the cultivated areas. Servicing means the furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operating and servicing of any improvement. Servicing shall also include vehicle, equipment, capital improvements and administrative costs associated with the annual administration and operation of the District. Process for Annual Assessment The City cannot levy and collect annual assessments within the District without complying with the procedures specified in the 1972 Act. On an annual basis, an Engineer's Report must be prepared which contains a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the district. The City Council must also adopt a resolution of intention which: • Declares the intention of the City Council to levy and collect assessments within the assessment district for the fiscal year stated therein. • Generally describes the existing and proposed improvements and any substantial changes proposed to be made in existing improvements. • Refers to the assessment district by its distinctive designation and indicate the general location of the district. • Refers to the report of the engineer, on file with the clerk, for a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the district. • Gives notice of the time and place for public hearing by the City Council on the levy of the proposed assessment. • States whether the assessment is proposed to increase from the previous year. If the assessments are to be levied in the same or lesser amounts than the maximum assessment amount approved, the clerk shall give notice by causing the resolution of intention to be published. Any interested person may, prior to the conclusion of the public hearing, file a written protest which shall state all grounds of objection. The protest shall contain a description sufficient to identify the property owned by the property owner filing the protest. During the course or upon conclusion of the hearing, the City Council may order changes in any of the matters provided in the report, including changes in the improvements, any zones within the assessment district, and the proposed diagram or the proposed assessment. The City Council, upon conclusion of the public hearing must then adopt a resolution confirming the diagram and assessment, either as originally proposed or as changed by it. The adoption of the resolution shall constitute the levy of an assessment for the fiscal year referred to in the assessment. Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2011 /12 If the assessment to be levied exceeds the maximum assessment amount previously approved, the City must comply with the procedures specified in Article XIII D and Proposition 218. The voters in the State of California in November 1996 added Article XIII D to the California Constitution imposing, among other requirements, the necessity for the City to conduct an assessment ballot procedure to enable the owners of each property on which assessments are proposed to be enacted or increased, the opportunity to express their support for, or opposition to the proposed assessment or increase in such assessment. The basic steps of the assessment ballot procedure are outlined below. The City must prepare a Notice of Public Hearing ("Notice"), which describes, along with other mandated information, the reason for the proposed assessments, and to provide a date and time of a public hearing to be held on the matter. The City must also prepare an assessment ballot, which clearly gives the property owner the ability to sign and mark their assessment ballot either in favor of, or in opposition to the proposed assessment. The Notice and assessment ballot are mailed to each affected property owner within the District a minimum of 45 days prior to the public hearing date as shown in the Notice. The City may also hold community meetings with the property owners to discuss the issues facing the District and to answer property owner questions directly. After the Notice and assessment ballot are mailed, property owners are given until the close of the public hearing, stated in the Notice, to return their signed and marked assessment ballot. During the public hearing, property owners are given the opportunity to address the City Council and ask questions or voice their concerns. At the public hearing, the returned assessment ballots received prior to the close of the public hearing are tabulated, weighted by the proposed assessment amount on each property and the results are announced by the City Council. Article XIII D provides that if, as a result of the assessment ballot proceeding, a majority protest is found to exist, the City Council shall not have the authority to levy and collect the assessments as proposed. A majority protest exists if the assessments represented by ballots submitted in opposition exceed those submitted in favor of the assessment. All returned ballots are tabulated and weighted according to the financial obligation of each particular parcel. If there is no majority protest as described above, the City Council may approve the proposed assessments. If there is a majority protest, as described above, the City will not levy and collect any assessments. Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2011/12 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS The District provides for the administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing of various improvements located within the public right-of-way and dedicated easements within the boundaries of the District. Description of the Boundaries of the District The District is located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California. The boundaries of the District are generally described as that area of the City bounded by Hermosa Avenue on the west, 26~" Avenue on the south, the parcels north of and along Bedford Drive and the parcels west of and along Andover Place Reference is also made to the Assessment Diagram included in this Report. Description of Improvements and Services The improvements are the maintenance and servicing of landscaping sites and appurtenant facilities throughout the District. The landscaping maintenance includes, but is not limited to, shrubs, turf, tree trimming, weed and pest control, landscape irrigation systems and testing, trash, debris and graffiti removal, and associated appurtenant facilities. Services include personnel, materials, contracting services, utilities, and alt necessary costs associated with the maintenance, replacement and repair required to keep the improvements in a healthy, vigorous and satisfactory condition. In addition, it is the City's intention to continue to use cost effective materials, including the future ability to replace landscaping with drought resistant or low water use plants, in order to lower expenses of the District. The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows: Parks: Tot Lot. Site # Descriptive Location I-1-5 The tot lot on the southwest corner of Andover and Bedford. Ground Cover area: 1,506 square feet Turt area: 1,070 square feet Parks are maintained by the City's Park Maintenance Crews Of ImprOVementS The following page shows the map of landscaping improvements, including irrigation sites and community trails, to be maintained using District funds. Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2011 /12 a. w ~ Z w d J w ~ Z Z ~ W ~ O J O ~ Q ~ F- F-- w~~~ Y `r' O W U w ~ ~ Q ~ ~ i O D i O a°'i o ti 0 ~ ~ °i 'y ~ o Q ~ o M V ~1.r O ~ ; O N •_ U O G~ ~ °o Q y ~ ~ o A`d`dSOW2i3H 0~~£~0 _ S °~~ooo$m~O~c°Em `-~ `o r `o ~° q~q ° r o°; E~ L~ g o nD~m~r~$.~'°m E~ o~ m o~ o E o o m m c n t U o m°~ m m_ m m 3 m£~ o m goim`m~g`o o°c~ 7'. O °~ t E m $s .a r c° S~ ~ '~ ' ~Q ~ o~._oo°ocoo°~°~cEQ ESTIMATE OF COSTS The estimated costs of administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing the improvements as described in the Plans and Specifications are summarized below. Each year, as part of the assessment district levy calculation process, the costs and expenses are reviewed and the annual costs are projected for the following fiscal year. District Estimated 2011/12 Bud et Personnel Services Regular Payroll $0.00 Pad-time Salaries 0.00 Frince Benefts 0.00 Subtotal Personnel $0.00 Operations and Maintenance Operations and Maintenance $600.00 Vehicle Operations and Maintenance 70.00 Contract Services 1,690.00 Contract Services/Facilities 0.00 Tree Maintenance 0.00 Utilities Water Utilities 420.00 Electric Utilities 480.00 Assessment Administration 240.00 General Overhead 360.00 Subtotal Operations and Maintenance $4,060.00 Capital Expenditures Caoital Projects 0.00 Subtotal Capital Expenditures $0.00 Total Expenditure Budget $4,060.00 Total Estimated Assessment $4,984.76 Plus Anticipated Delinquency Penalty 1 045.24 Total Estimated Revenue $6,030.00 Less Operating Reserve Fund Collection (1.970.001 Total Expenditure Budget $4,060.00 Total Estimated Assessment $4,984.76 Total District EBU Count 44.00 Actual Assessment per EBU -Fiscal Year 2011/12 $113.29 Maximum Allowable Assessment er EBU -Fiscal Year 2011/12 $113.29 The maximum allowable assessment per EBU listed in the District budget above, is the amount which was approved in 1996/97 and subsequent District annexations. Each year, prior to the assessments being placed on the tax roll, the City will review the budget and determine the amount needed to maintain the improvements for the upcoming fiscal year. The actual assessment per EBU will be Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2011/12 based on the estimated costs of maintenance, available fund balance and maximum allowable assessment with the goal of maintaining the improvements in a satisfactory and healthy condition. The actual assessment amount may be lower than the maximum allowable assessment; however it may not exceed the maximum unless the increase is approved by the property owners in accordance with Proposition 218. It is the intent of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to maintain an Operating Reserve which shall not exceed the estimated costs of maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or when the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The reserve balance information for the District is as follows: Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2011 Reserve Fund Balance $72,130.59 Operating Reserve Contribution -Fiscal Year 2011/12 0.00 O~erating Reserve Collection -Fiscal Year 2011/12 1.970.00 Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2012 Reserve Fund Balance $74,100.59 Definitions of Budget Items The following definitions describe the costs and expenses included in the District Budget Personnel Services Regular Salaries: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all full-time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Part Time Salaries: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all part time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Fringe Benefits: This item includes the benefits available to City employees: health care, vacation, sick time, and retirement fund. Operations and Maintenance Contract Services: This item includes the contract costs of a landscape maintenance company responsible for the ongoing maintenance of the District improvements. Tree Maintenance: This item includes the contract costs attributed to maintaining the street trees and other trees throughout the District. Utilities -Water: This item includes the costs to furnish water for the landscaping within the District. Utilities -Electric: This item includes the costs to furnish electricity required for the operation and maintenance of the sprinklers and irrigation controllers. Assessment Administration: This item includes the cost to all particular departments and staff of the City, and consultants for providing the administration, coordination and management of District services, operations, and incidental expenses related to the District. This item also includes creation of an annual engineer's report, resolutions and placing the assessment amounts onto the County tax roll each year, along with responding to any public inquiries and future Proposition 218 balloting proceedings. General Overhead: This item includes the costs of all departments and staff of the City for providing the coordination of District services, inspections, annual bid management, responding to public Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2011/12 concerns, public education, accounting, auditing and procedural matters associated with the District. This item also includes an allocation for general City staff time for administrative functions and systems that provide for a functional and operational assessment district within the City's administrative structure. Capital Expenditures: Capital Projects: This item includes new improvements to further enhance the level and quality of service provided within the boundaries of the District. This may include new monuments, irrigation systems, and other large improvements. Operating Reserve Collection: Operating Reserve Collection: This item includes the amount to be collected to maintain reserves to enable the City to pay for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or whenever the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The Reserve Fund contribution will continue until such a time the Reserve Fund balance is approximately one half of the annual costs. The fund may be allowed to accumulate in anticipation of any unforeseen expenses not included in the yearly maintenance costs. This may include, but is not limited to, tree replacements, repair of damaged equipment due to vandalism, storms and other similar events. Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2011/12 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT General Pursuant to the 1972 Act and Article XIII D, all parcels that have a special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements and services shall be identified, and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel shall be determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of improvements. The 1972 Act, permits the establishment of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include the operation, maintenance and servicing of landscaping improvements. Section 22573 of the 1972 Act requires that maintenance assessments must be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. This Section states: "The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district maybe apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements." The determination of whether or not a lot or parcel will benefit from the improvements shall be made pursuant to the Improvement Act of 1911 (Division 7 (commencing with Section 5000) Hof the Streets and Highways Code, State of California)." The 1972 Act also permits the designation of zones of benefit within any individual assessment district if "by reasons or variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive different degrees of benefit from the improvement" (Sec. 22547). Article XIII D, Section 4(a) of the California Constitution limits the amount of any assessment to the proportional special benefit conferred on the property. Article XIII D also provides that publicly owned properties must be assessed unless there is clear and convincing evidence that those properties receive no special benefit from the assessment. Exempted from the assessment would be the areas of public streets, public avenues, public lanes, public roads, public drives, public courts, public alleys, public easements and rights-of-ways, public greenbelts and public parkways. The net amount to be assessed may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels. Proposition 218, approved by the voters in November 1996, requires the City to separate general benefit from special benefit, where only special benefit is assessed. Benefit The maintenance and servicing of the improvements within the District (which are described in the Description of Improvements and Services Section of this report) are for the benefit of the properties within the District, and as such confer a special and direct benefit to parcels within the District by: • improving the livability, appearance, and desirability for properties within the boundaries of the District, and • ensuring that improvements do not reach a state of deterioration or disrepair so as to be materially detrimental to properties within the District, and Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2011/12 • providing beautification, shade and overall enhancement to properties within the District. The above mentioned items affect the assessed property in a way that is particular and distinct from their effect on other parcels and that real property in general and the public at large do not share. They contribute to a specific enhancement of the properties within the District. Since these improvements, including the community trails, were installed and are maintained specifically for the properties within the District; only properties within the District receive a special benefit and are assessed for said maintenance. General Benefit In addition to the special benefits received by parcels within the District, there are derivative general benefits that are conferred on parcels outside the boundaries of the District which include: • the control of dust and insect infestations, and • the visual enhancement of the area to persons or vehicles that may travel through the District. However it has been determined that these benefits are derivative and do not provide a direct benefit to parcels outside of the district that are not being assessed. Method of Assessment Each of the parcels within the District is deemed to receive special benefit from the improvements. Each parcel that has a special benefit conferred upon it as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements are identified and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel is determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of the improvements. When the District was formed in 1984, Article XIII D and Proposition 218 had not yet been passed. Upon the passage of Article XIII D and the subsequent passage of the Proposition Omnibus Implementation Act, new rules were put into place. Due to the changes in legal requirements, as property annexed to the District after the passage of the Assessment Law, the description of the method of assessment became more refined, however, the assessment per parcel has remained the same since the 1996/97 Fiscal Year. Further, no parcel included in the District formation or annexations prior to when the language was refined, are now being levied differently than they were at the time the District was formed or the parcels were annexed. To assess special benefit appropriately, it is necessary to relate the different type of parcel improvements to each other. The Equivalent Benefit Unit ("EBU") method of apportionment uses the single family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single family home equals one Equivalent Benefit Unit (EBU). Every other land-use is converted to EBUs based on an assessment formula that equates to the property's specific development status, type of development (land-use), and size of the property, as compared to a single family home. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land-use types, as assigned by County use code, to determine each parcel's EBU assignment. Land-Use E uivalent Dwellin Units Pro ert T e Count Use Code EBU Value Multi tier Single Family Residential 1.00 Dwelling Unit Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 10 Fiscal Year 2011/12 The use of the latest County Assessor's Secured Roll shall be the basis for the Property Type determination and units/acreage assignments, unless better data is available to the City. In addition, if any parcel within the District is identified by the County Auditor/Controller to be an invalid parcel number for the current fiscal year, the Property Type and EBU assignment shall be based on the correct parcel number and/or new parcel number(s) County use code and subsequent property information. If a single parcel has changed to multiple parcels, the EBU assignment and assessment amount applied to each of the new parcels will be recalculated rather than spread the proportionate share of the original assessment. The following table summarizes the Fiscal Year 2011/12 maximum allowable assessment rates for the District: Maximum Allowable Property Type Assessment Rate Actual Assessment Total Total (County Use Code) er EBU Rate per EBU UnitslAcres EBUs Single Family Residential $113.29 $113.29 44 44 The total amount of maintenance and incidental costs for maintaining the landscaping and community trail improvements is assessed to the individual parcels of real property within the District in proportion to the special benefit received by such parcels of real property. The proposed individual assessments are shown on the assessment roll in this report. Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 11 Fiscal Year 2011112 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM An Assessment Diagram for the District is shown on the following page. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the County Assessor of the County San Bernardino, at the time this report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Engineer's Report. Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 12 Fiscal Year 2011/12 ~+ .~ 'i +~ •~ W ~~ ~5_ ^`` W v a J ny ua~lll!W ny uaneH ny esow~aH nV PIeQ!yo~b' ny uewllaH ig ue!lawe~ of sc VE 2~ ~~ ~„~ c 7 ~\ I ny epuenn!i3r 8 ~aa~~ Rea. ny ~alsayooa i ny /~~ay~ v D: N C _ J [0 ~ N = y L ~ 0 O m lL Q -~ - I ~ / \ N J Q C CJ ~ J~ ^~ J ti•r ~J N N o,, ® ~ 0 ON N O nb' ise3 cn L ,.i _.._.._.._ ny epuenn!13 ~ ~ ~--_~- ~ ~~ I I ~ _; ~1I~ - _ ~ I -- 1 '- - II i ~M~. . .• I e~~ ' w .~• m 'O ~' ~ C d ~ ~ ~ C d1 -_ N m S 'i ny ~alsayooa ~ ny ua~lll!W _ , _ i ny uaneH I ~ III}}I j - nyesow~aH - - I ~ +--- ~ i t jnd PIe9!4o~H 1 ~" ~ ny uewllaH r••~ t L v a ~ '~ .._:-.ti.._..__ ~..- -r ny anal c m ~ ••~ J = ?~ L ~ ~ O a0 O Q m lL E 6 8•~ a~g Eie ASSESSMENT ROLL Assessment Roll The assessment roll is a listing of the assessment for Fiscal Year 2011/12 apportioned to each lot or parcel, as shown on the last equalized roll of the Assessor of the County of San Bernardino. The following tables summarize the Fiscal Year 2011/12 maximum and actual assessments for the District: Maximum Allowable Maximum Property Type Assessment Rate Total Total Allowable Count Use Code er EBU Units/Acres EBUs Assessment Single Family Residential $113.29 44 44 $4,964.76 Actual Property Type Assessment Rate Total Total Actual Coun Use Code er EBU Units/Acres EBUs Assessment Single Family Residential $113.29 44 44 $4,984.76 A copy of the full assessment roll is available for review in the City Clerk's office. Annexations There were no annexations effective for the 2011/12 Fiscal Year: Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 13 Fiscal Year 2011/12 Revised Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2011/2012 City of Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 6-R (Caryn Planned Community) CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 6 (CARYN PLANNED COMMUNITY) 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Phone: 909.477.2700 Fax: 909.477.2741 CITY COUNCIL L. Dennis Michael, Mayor Sam Spagnolo, Mayor Pro Tem William Alexander, Council Member Chuck Buquet, Council Member Diane Williams, Council Member CITY STAFF John R. Gillison, Assistant City Manager Linda D. Daniels, Deputy City Manager William Wittkopf, Public Works Director Ingrid Y. Bruce, GIS/Special Districts Manager Christopher Bopko, Management Analyst III TABLE OF CONTENTS ENGINEER'S LETTER INTRODUCTION 1 3 Reason for Assessment .............................................................................................3 Process for Annual Assessment .................................................................................3 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS 5 Description of the Boundaries of the District ...............................................................5 Description of Improvements and Services ................................................................5 Map of Improvements .................................................................................................8 ESTIMATE OF COSTS 9 District Budget ............................................................................................................9 Definitions of Budget Items .......................................................................................10 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT 12 General ............................................................................. ........................................12 Special Benefit ................................................................. ........................................12 General Benefit ................................................................ ........................................13 Method of Assessment Spread ........................................ ........................................13 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM ASSESSMENT ROLL 15 16 Assessment Roll .......................................................................................................16 Annexations ..............................................................................................................16 ENGINEER'S LETTER WHEREAS, on ,the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga (the "City"), under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 (the "1972 Act") adopted its Resolution No. _, a Resolution Initiating Proceedings for the Levy of Annual Assessments for Landscape Maintenance District No. 6 (Caryn Planned Community) (the "District"); and WHEREAS, the Resolution Initiating Proceedings directed NBS to prepare and file an Engineer's Report for Fiscal Year 2011112 pursuant to the requirements of the 1972 Act. The Engineer's Report presents the plans and specifications describing the general nature, location and extent of the improvements to be maintained, an estimate of the costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements for the District for the referenced fiscal year, a diagram for the District, showing the area and properties proposed to be assessed, and an assessment of the estimated costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing the improvements, assessing the net amount upon all assessable lots and/or parcels within the District in proportion to the special benefit received; and NOW THEREFORE, the following assessment is proposed to be authorized in order to pay the estimated costs of maintenance, operation and servicing of the improvements to be paid by the assessable real property within the boundaries of the District in proportion to the special benefit received. The following table summarizes the proposed assessment. SUMMARY OF ASSESSMENT Fiscal Year 2011172 Total Estimated Assessment $315,133.72 Less Anticipated Delinquencies 15 443.72 Total Estimated Revenue $299,690.00 Less Reserve Fund Collection 28,110.00 Total Expenditure Budget $271,580.00 Total District EBU Count 1,276.00 Actual Assessment per EBU $246.97 Maximum Allowable Assessment per EBU $246.97 In making the assessments contained herein pursuant to the 1972 Act: I have identified all parcels which will have a special benefit conferred upon them from the improvements described in the Special Benefit Section of this Engineer's Report (the "Specially Benefited Parcels"). For particulars as to the identification of said parcels, reference is made to the Assessment Diagram, a copy of which is included in this Engineer's Report. 2. I have evaluated the costs and expenses of the improvements upon the Specially Benefited Parcels. In making such evaluation: Landscape Maintenance District No. 6-R -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2011/12 a. The proportionate special benefit derived by each Specially Benefited Parcel from the improvements was determined in relationship to the entirety of the maintenance costs of the improvements; b. No assessment has been imposed on any Specially Benefited Parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on such parcel from the improvements; and c. Any general benefits from the improvements have been separated from the special benefits and only special benefits have been assessed. I, the undersigned, respectfully submit the enclosed Engineer's Report and, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, the Engineer's Report, Assessments, and the Assessment Diagram herein have been prepared and computed in accordance with the order of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Assessment Law. Mark A. Steuer, City Engineer Landscape Maintenance District No. 6-R -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2011/12 INTRODUCTION Reason for Assessment Approval of the assessment covered by this Engineer's Report will generate the revenue necessary to: Provide for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements described in this Engineer's Report. Maintenance may include but is not limited to, all of the following: the repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement, providing for the life, growth, health and beauty of the landscaping, including cultivation, irrigation, trimming, spraying, fertilizing or treating for disease or injury, the removal of trimming, rubbish, debris and other solid waste, the maintenance, repair and replacement as necessary of all irrigation systems and the removal of graffiti from walls immediately adjacent to the cultivated areas. Servicing means the furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operating and servicing of any improvement. Servicing shall also include vehicle, equipment, capital improvements and administrative costs associated with the annual administration and operation of the District. Process for Annual Assessment The City cannot levy and collect annual assessments within the District without complying with the procedures specified in the 1972 Act. On an annual basis, an Engineer's Report must be prepared which contains a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the district. The City Council must also adopt a resolution of intention which: • Declares the intention of the City Council to levy and collect assessments within the assessment district for the fiscal year stated therein. • Generally describes the existing and proposed improvements and any substantial changes proposed to be made in existing improvements. • Refers to the assessment district by its distinctive designation and indicate the general location of the district. • Refers to the report of the engineer, on file with the clerk, for a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the district. • Gives notice of the time and place for public hearing by the City Council on the levy of the proposed assessment. • States whether the assessment is proposed to increase from the previous year. If the assessments are to be levied in the same or lesser amounts than the maximum assessment amount approved, the clerk shall give notice by causing the resolution of intention to be published. Any interested person may, prior to the conclusion of the public hearing, file a written protest which shall state all grounds of objection. The protest shall contain a description sufficient to identify the property owned by the property owner filing the protest. During the course or upon conclusion of the hearing, the City Council may order changes in any of the matters provided in the report, including changes in the improvements, any zones within the assessment district, and the proposed diagram or the proposed assessment. The City Council, upon conclusion of the public hearing must then adopt a resolution confirming the diagram and assessment, either as originally proposed or as changed by it. The adoption of the resolution shall constitute the levy of an assessment for the fiscal year referred to in the assessment. Landscape Maintenance District No. 6-R -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2011/12 If the assessment to be levied exceeds the maximum assessment amount previously approved, the City must comply with the procedures specified in Article XIII D and Proposition 218. The voters in the State of California in November 1996 added Article XIII D to the California Constitution imposing, among other requirements, the necessity for the City to conduct an assessment ballot procedure to enable the owners of each property on which assessments are proposed to be enacted or increased, the opportunity to express their support for, or opposition to the proposed assessment or increase in such assessment. The basic steps of the assessment ballot procedure are outlined below. The City must prepare a Notice of Public Hearing ("Notice'), which describes, along with other mandated information, the reason for the proposed assessments, and to provide a date and time of a public hearing to be held on the matter. The City must also prepare an assessment ballot, which clearly gives the property owner the ability to sign and mark their assessment ballot either in favor of, or in opposition to the proposed assessment. The Notice and assessment ballot are mailed to each affected property owner within the District a minimum of 45 days prior to the public hearing date as shown in the Notice. The City may also hold community meetings with the property owners to discuss the issues facing the District and to answer property owner questions directly. After the Notice and assessment ballot are mailed, property owners are given until the close of the public hearing, stated in the Notice, to return their signed and marked assessment ballot. During the public hearing, property owners are given the opportunity to address the City Council and ask questions or voice their concerns. At the public hearing, the returned assessment ballots received prior to the close of the public hearing are tabulated, weighted by the proposed assessment amount on each property and the results are announced by the City Council. Article XIII D provides that if, as a result of the assessment ballot proceeding, a majority protest is found to exist, the City Council shall not have the authority to levy and collect the assessments as proposed. A majority protest exists if the assessments represented by ballots submitted in opposition exceed those submitted in favor of the assessment. All returned ballots are tabulated and weighted according to the financial obligation of each particular parcel. If there is no majority protest as described above, the City Council may approve the proposed assessments. If there is a majority protest, as described above, the City will not levy and collect any assessments. Landscape Maintenance District No. 6-R -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2011 /12 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS The District provides for the administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing of various improvements located within the public right-of-way and dedicated easements within the boundaries of the District. Description of the Boundaries of the District The District is located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California. The boundaries of the District are generally described as that area of the City known as the Caryn Planned Community, which is generally bounded by Milliken Avenue on the west, Banyan Street on the north, Highland Avenue on the south and Rochester Avenue on the east. Reference is also made to the Assessment Diagram included in this Report. Description of Improvements and Services The improvements are the maintenance and servicing of landscaping sites and appurtenant facilities throughout the District. The landscaping maintenance includes, but is not limited to, shrubs, turf, tree trimming, weed and pest control, landscape irrigation systems and testing, trash, debris and graffiti removal, and associated appurtenant facilities. Services include personnel, materials, contracting services, utilities, and all necessary costs associated with the maintenance, replacement and repair required to keep the improvements in a healthy, vigorous and satisfactory condition. In addition, it is the City's intention to continue to use cost effective materials, including the future ability to replace landscaping with drought resistant or low water use plants, in order to lower expenses of the District. The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows: Site # Descriptive Location CC-1 The Southside of Banyan St. from 1290 feet west of Milliken to Milliken. The west side of Milliken & median from Banyan St. to 292 south of Vintage Dr. Ground Cover area: 96,892 square feet Turf area: 17,945 square feet Hardscape area: 13,944 square feet CC-2 For information purposes: This site was deleted 7-1-00 and was combined with CC-1 CC-3 The paseo on the west side of Morning PI. from Morning PI. to Deer Creek Channel. Ground Cover area: 2,801 square feet Turf area: 124 square feet Hardscape area: 4,609 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 6-R -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2011/12 CC-4 The west side of Morning PI., from Banyan St. to Starview PI. The north side of Starview PI., from Morning PI. to Star View Ct. Ground Cover area: 14,273 square feet Turt area: 5,513 square feet Hardscape area: 5,000 square feet CC-5 Silver Sun paseo fro m the end of Silver Sun cul-de-sac to Deer Creek Channel. Ground Cover area: 25,890 square feet Turf area: 12,084 square feet Hardscape area: 1,350 square feet CC-6 The east and west side of Netherlands View Loop from Vintage Dr. to Vintage Dr. The Netherlands View Loop paseo from Netherlands View Loop to Mt Sterling Ct. Ground Cover area: 88,902 square feet Turt area: 676 square feet Hardscape area: 23,650 square feet CC-7 The east and west side of Hillview Loop from Mt. Rainer Ct. to Kettle Peak. Ground Cover area: 14,930 square feet Turf area: 6,318 square feet Hardscape area: 12,236 square feet CC-8 The paseo from Hillview Loop to Vintage Dr. Ground Cover area: 42,107 square feet Turf area: 22,752 square feet Hardscape area: 4,089 square feet CC-9 The south side of Vintage Dr. from 250 feet west of Hillview Loop to Hillview Loop. The west side of Hillview Loop from Vintage Dr. to Kettle Peak. The west side of Kettle Peak from Hillview Loop to Donner Pass Ct. The east side of Hillview Loop from Kettle Peak to Tioga Peak. Ground Cover area: 47,334 square feet Turt area: 4,954 square feet Hardscape area: 9,088 square feet CC-10 The east side of Terrace View Loop from Vintage Dr. to Butler Peak. The west side of Terrace View Loop from Rainbow Falls Ct. to Vintage Dr. Ground Cover area: 24,603 square feet Hardscape area: 10,760 square feet CC-11 The paseo from Caryn School to Banyan St. The south side of Banyan St. from the paseo to Rochester Ave. The east and west side of Mt. Baldy Ct. from Banyan St. to Sierra Crest View Loop. The north side of Sierra Crest View Loop from Hilltop Ct. to Woodland Ct. Ground Cover area: 47,507 square feet Turf area: 7,810 square feet Hardscape area: 7,825 square feet CC-12 The Separation Paseo from Vintage Dr. to Pinnacle Peak. Ground Cover area: 50,325 square feet Turf area: 15,021 square feet Hardscape area: 7,675 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 6-R -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2011/12 CC-13 The east side of Hillview Loop from Tioga Peak Ct. to Vintage Dr. The south side of Vintage Dr. from Hillview Loop to Terrace View Loop. The north side of Vintage Dr. from Hillview Loop to Caryn School. The east side of Terrace View Loop from Vintage Dr. to Mt. San Antonio Ct. Ground Cover area: 26,162 square feet Turf area: 4,508 square feet Hardscape area: 12,928 square feet CC-14 The east side of Sierra Crest View Loop from Mt. Waverly to Vintage Dr. The north side of Vintage Dr. from Sierra Crest View Loop to Sierra Crest View Loop. The east and west side of Sierra Crest View Loop from Vintage Dr. to Mt. Wilson Ct. The south side of Vintage Dr. from Netherlands View Loop to 330 feet west of Netherlands View Loop. Ground Cover area: 73,250 square feet Turf area: 16,525 square feet Hardscape area: 9,885 square feet CC-15 The south side of Sierra Crest View Loop from Mt. Waverly Ct. to Mt. Cambridge Ct. The north side of Sierra Crest View Loop from Mt. Cambridge Ct. to Woodland Ct. The north side of Sierra Crest View Loop from Hilltop Ct. to Caryn School. The Sierra Crest View Loop paseo from Sierra Crest View Loop to Mt. Sherman Ct. Ground Cover area: 70,990 square feet Turf area: 7,699 square feet Hardscape area: 20,055 square feet CC-16 The south side of Vintage Dr. from Netherlands View Loop to Rochester Ave. The north side of Vintage Dr. from Rochester Ave. to Sierra Crest View Loop. The east and west side of Sierra Crest View Loop from Mt. Wilson Ct. to Mt. Cambridge Ct. The Netherlands View Loop Paseo from Vintage Dr. to Mt. Sterling Ct. Ground Cover area: 77,202 square feet Turf area: 3,954 square feet Hardscape area: 18,195 square feet CC-17 The east side of Milliken Ave. from Vintage Dr. to Banyan St. Ground Cover area: 13,740 square feet Turf area: 9,088 square feet Hardscape area: 6,460 square feet CC-18 The north side of Vintage Dr. from Milliken Ave. to Hillview Loop. The south side of Vintage Dr. from 104 feet west of Hillview Loop to Milliken Ave. Ground Cover area: 32,287 square feet Turf area: 3,889 square feet Hardscape area: 11,188 square feet CC-19 The Terrace View Loop paseo from Vintage Dr. to Terrace View Loop. Ground Cover area: 17,496 square feet Turf area: 15,617 square feet Hardscape area: 2,736 square feet CC-20 The east side of Terrace View Loop from Mt. San Antonio Ct. to EI Capitan Ct. The west side of Terrace View Loop from Butler Peak PI. to Mt San Antonio Ct. Ground Cover area: 20,627 square feet Turf area: 20,017 square feet Hardscape area: 7,888 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 6-R -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2011/12 CC-21 The west side of Rochester from Banyan to 317 feet south of Vintage Dr. Ground Cover area: 31,292 square feet CC-22 The south side of Vintage Dr. from Terrace View Loop to Sierra Crest View Loop. The east and west side of Hillview Loop from Vintage Dr. to Mt. Rainer Ct. Ground Cover area: 11,609 square feet Turf area: 3,763 square feet Hardscape area: 6,524 square feet CC-23 The south side of Banyan from Milliken to Butler Peak PI. The west side of Butler Peak PI. from Banyan St. to Terrace View Loop. The north side of Terrace View Loop from Butler Peak PI. to Rainbow Falls Ct. Ground Cover area: 12,132 square feet Hardscape area: 528 square feet CC-24 The north side of Terrace View Loop from EI Capitan Ct. to Butler Peak PI. The east side of Butler Peak PI. from Terrace View Loop to Banyan St. The south side of Banyan St. from Butler Peak PI. to 990 feet east of Butler Peak PI. Ground Cover area: 14,452 square feet Hardscape area: 1,600 square feet CC-25 This site was moved to CC-13. This mainline was part of CC-13 and should not have been its own site. CC-26 The east side of Rochester from 210 freeway to Vintage Dr. The north and south side of Vintage from to Rochester to Thunder Mountain Ct. The west side of Rochester from 317 feet south of Vintage Dr. to the 210 freeway. Ground Cover area: 35,037 square feet Hardscape area: 19,779 square feet CC-27 The Milliken median and the westside of Milliken from 292 feet south of Vintage to 210 freeway. Ground Cover area: 13,365 square feet Hardscape area: 12,300 square feet CC-28 The east side of Milliken from Vintage to the 210 freeway right- of- way. Ground Cover area: 17,724 square feet Hardscape area: 8,197 square feet Map of Improvements The following page shows the map of landscaping improvements, including irrigation sites and community trails, to be maintained using District funds. Landscape Maintenance District No. 6-R -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2011/12 a z g w ~ ~ z w a ._, w O J O J LL1 U` ~ C7 Y O t0 F- ~ ~ 2 O a ~ ~ ~ ~ nd ~~1s3H~oa ' I ' a a 0 0 i LO Z .~+ V .L ~~ •- !~ ~~ ~~ V = ~ ~ !~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~~ Q. V J O m w w f- ~ U O w a ~ ~ I N N d- O~ M O N O z r- ~ O a Q O Z Y O O ~ N LL O O ti N ~ N3~iIl~IW c ~~~~~'~ T ~~~~°= cAC m mE~2';E~QQo co O Ol p _ L '_ -" N O U N d ~ E€ c° m m D°~ o~~ U d y~ E N~p pp _ _ o I~ ~ U~~ U° O ~yy y '"' c L U m` C C ~L C 7 C n y N L Oj N 3 C1 ~ C~~ O~ ~ \-V mEScyancmE~`~~pY ~ oL°vooyu°ii yom3 ~'c~g. O A~~ucimE ~v~macu°i~`°`o m~ ` ~ ~ N ~ l6 1= ~ ~ ~ ~ T N d N c~ o~~oc o~z~~`=co `c°c OOZE ~N._ y~a~° m~n'c.m Z L U o ~' ~ y L v m ~~ ; y E E° m ~-' `~ c E T ~~ °-°-° ~ H ~ ~rnB°ooooc~dEa ta9iv o ~ a N rnonUiaU.°cmU=vmcm.Sa. r c o C o ioiovA r'o~,9nm gm.~ ~a c° `~ ~ o ~9 o N E 1OL c E ~t m~ yZ'~ c mr~ c2'E=,Q~y o o `a ` I~ ~ E_mnUco~Ec$'UmCyc~c~m_ d N d d U O O~ N U G1 f0 B T U fU Q FL- ~ co F=- 3 N C n D H a n ~;= N~ m o ~'a F- z r z Q m ESTIMATE OF COSTS The estimated costs of administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing the improvements as described in the Plans and Specifications are summarized below. Each year, as part of the assessment district levy calculation process, the costs and expenses are reviewed and the annual costs are projected for the following fiscal year. District Estimated 2011112 Bud et Personnel Services Regular Payroll $7,120.00 Part-time Salaries 0.00 Fringe Benefits ~ 3.350.00 Subtotal Personnel $10,470.00 Operations and Maintenance Operations and Maintenance $6,000.00 Vehicle Operations and Maintenance 0.00 Contract Services 99,420.00 Contract Services/Facilities 0.00 Tree Maintenance 16,870.00 Utilities Water Utilities 100,800.00 Electric Utilities 6,260.00 Assessment Administration 7,020.00 General Overhead 24.740.00 Subtotal Operations and Maintenance $261,110.00 Capital Expenditures Capital Projects 0.00 Subtotal Capital Expenditures $0.00 Total District Expenditure Budget $271,580.00 Total Estimated Assessment $315,133.72 Less Anticipated Delinquencies (15 443.72) Total Estimated Revenues $299,690.00 Less Operating Reserve Fund Collection (28,110.00) Total Expenditure Budget $271,580.00 Total Estimated Assessment $315,133.72 Total District EBU Count 1,276.00 Actual Assessment per EBU -Fiscal Year 2011/12 $246.97 Maximum Allowable Assessment er EBU -Fiscal Year 2011/12 $246.97 The maximum allowable assessment per EBU listed in the District budget above, is the amount which was approved in 1996/97 and subsequent District annexations. Each year, prior to the assessments being placed on the tax roll, the City will review the budget and determine the amount needed to maintain the improvements for the upcoming fiscal year. The actual assessment per EBU will be Landscape Maintenance District No. 6-R -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2011/12 based on the estimated costs of maintenance, available fund balance and maximum allowable assessment with the goal of maintaining the improvements in a satisfactory and healthy condition. The actual assessment amount may be lower than the maximum allowable assessment; however it may not exceed the maximum unless the increase is approved by the property owners in accordance with Proposition 218. It is the intent of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to maintain an Operating Reserve which shall not exceed the estimated costs of maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or when the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The reserve balance information for the District is as follows: Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2011 Reserve Fund Balance $10,030.67 Operating Reserve Contribution -Fiscal Year 2011/12 0.00 Ooerating Reserve Collection -Fiscal Year 2011/12 28.110.00 Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2012 Reserve Fund Balance $38,140.67 Definitions of Budaet Items The following definitions describe the costs and expenses included in the District Budget Personnel Services Regular Salaries: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all full-time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Part Time Salaries: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all part time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Fringe Benefits: This item includes the benefits available to City employees: health care, vacation, sick time, and retirement fund. Operations and Maintenance Contract Services: This item includes the contract costs of a landscape maintenance company responsible for the ongoing maintenance of the District improvements. Tree Maintenance: This item includes the contract costs attributed to maintaining the street trees and other trees throughout the District. Utilities -Water: This item includes the costs to furnish water for the landscaping within the District. Utilities -Electric: This item includes the costs to furnish electricity required for the operation and maintenance of the sprinklers and irrigation controllers. Assessment Administration: This item includes the cost to all particular departments and staff of the City, and consultants for providing the administration, coordination and management of District services, operations, and incidental expenses related to the District. This item also includes creation of an annual engineer's report, resolutions and placing the assessment amounts onto the County tax roll each year, along with responding to any public inquiries and future Proposition 218 balloting proceedings. General Overhead: This item includes the costs of all departments and staff of the City for providing the coordination of District services, inspections, annual bid management, responding to public Landscape Maintenance District No. 6-R -City of Rancho Cucamonga 10 Fiscal Year 2011 /12 concerns, public education, accounting, auditing and procedural matters associated with the District. This item also includes an allocation for general City staff time for administrative functions and systems that provide for a functional and operational assessment district within the City's administrative structure. Capital Expenditures: Capital Projects: This item includes new improvements to further enhance the level and quality of service provided within the boundaries of the District. This may include new monuments, irrigation systems, and other large improvements. Operating Reserve Collection: Operating Reserve Collection: This item includes the amount to be collected to maintain reserves to enable the City to pay for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or whenever the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The Reserve Fund contribution will continue until such a time the Reserve Fund balance is approximately one half of the annual costs. The fund may be allowed to accumulate in anticipation of any unforeseen expenses not included in the yearly maintenance costs. This may include, but is not limited to, tree replacements, repair of damaged equipment due to vandalism, storms and other similar events. Landscape Maintenance District No. 6-R -City of Rancho Cucamonga 11 Fiscal Year 2011/12 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT General Pursuant to the 1972 Act and Article XIII D, all parcels that have a special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements and services shall be identified, and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel shall be determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of improvements. The 1972 Act, permits the establishment of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include the operation, maintenance and servicing of landscaping improvements. Section 22573 of the 1972 Act requires that maintenance assessments must be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. This Section states: "The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district maybe apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements." The determination of whether or not a lot or parcel will benefit from the improvements shall be made pursuant to the Improvement Act of 1911 (Division 7 (commencing with Section 5000) (of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California)." The 1972 Act also permits the designation of zones of benefit within any individual assessment district if "by reasons or variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive different degrees of benefit from the improvement" (Sec. 22547). Article XIII D, Section 4(a) of the California Constitution limits the amount of any assessment to the proportional special benefit conferred on the property. Article XIII D also provides that publicly owned properties must be assessed unless there is clear and convincing evidence that those properties receive no special benefit from the assessment. Exempted from the assessment would be the areas of public streets, public avenues, public lanes, public roads, public drives, public courts, public alleys, public easements and rights-of-ways, public greenbelts and public parkways. The net amount to be assessed may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels. Proposition 218, approved by the voters in November 1996, requires the City to separate general benefit from special benefit, where only special benefit is assessed. Benefit The maintenance and servicing of the improvements within the District (which are described in the Description of Improvements and Services Section of this report) are for the benefit of the properties within the District, and as such confer a special and direct benefit to parcels within the District by: • improving the livability, appearance, and desirability for properties within the boundaries of the District, and • ensuring that improvements do not reach a state of deterioration or disrepair so as to be materially detrimental to properties within the District, and Landscape Maintenance District No. 6-R -City of Rancho Cucamonga 12 Fiscal Year 2011/12 • providing beautification, shade and overall enhancement to properties within the District. The above mentioned items affect the assessed property in a way that is particular and distinct from their effect on other parcels and that real property in general and the public at large do not share. They contribute to a specific enhancement of the properties within the District. Since these improvements, including the community trails, were installed and are maintained specifically for the properties within the District; only properties within the District receive a special benefit and are assessed for said maintenance. General Benefit In addition to the special benefits received by parcels within the District, there are derivative general benefits that are conferred on parcels outside the boundaries of the District which include: • the control of dust and insect infestations, and ' • the visual enhancement of the area to persons or vehicles that may travel through the District. However it has been determined that these benefits are derivative and do not provide a direct benefit to parcels outside of the district that are not being assessed. Method of Assessment Each of the parcels within the District is deemed to receive special benefit from the improvements. Each parcel that has a special benefit conferred upon it as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements are identified and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel is determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of the improvements. When the District was formed in 1984, Article XIII D and Proposition 218 had not yet been passed. Upon the passage of Article XIII D and the subsequent passage of the Proposition Omnibus Implementation Act, new rules were put into place. Due to the changes in legal requirements, as property annexed to the District after the passage of the Assessment Law, the description of the method of assessment became more refined, however, the assessment per parcel has remained the same since the 1996/97 Fiscal Year. Further, no parcel included in the District formation or annexations prior to when the language was refined, are now being levied differently than they were at the time the District was formed or the parcels were annexed. To assess special benefit appropriately, it is necessary to relate the different type of parcel improvements to each other. The Equivalent Benefit Unit ("EBU") method of apportionment uses the single family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single family home equals one Equivalent Benefit Unit (EBU). Every other land-use is converted to EBUs based on an assessment formula that equates to the property's specific development status, type of development (land-use), and size of the property, as compared to a single family home. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land-use types, as assigned by County use code, to determine each parcel's EBU assignment. Land-Use E uivalent Dwellin Units Pro ert T e Count Use Code EBU Value Multi lier Single Family Residential 1.00 Dwelling Unit Landscape Maintenance District No. 6-R -City of Rancho Cucamonga 13 Fiscal Year 2011/12 The use of the latest County Assessor's Secured Roll shall be the basis for the Property Type determination and units/acreage assignments, unless better data is available to the City. In addition, if any parcel within the District is identified by the County Auditor/Controller to be an invalid parcel number for the current fiscal year, the Property Type and EBU assignment shall be based on the correct parcel number and/or new parcel number(s) County use code and subsequent property information. If a single parcel has changed to multiple parcels, the EBU assignment and assessment amount applied to each of the new parcels will be recalculated rather than spread the proportionate share of the original assessment. The following table summarizes the Fiscal Year 2011/12 maximum allowable assessment rates for the District: Maximum Allowable Property Type Assessment Rate Actual Assessment Total Total (County Use Code) er EBU Rate per EBU UnitslAcres EBUs Single Family Residential $246.97 $246.97 1,276 1,276 The total amount of maintenance and incidental costs for maintaining the landscaping and community trail improvements is assessed to the individual parcels of real property within the District in proportion to the special benefit received by such parcels of real property. The proposed individual assessments are shown on the assessment roll in this report. Landscape Maintenance District No. 6-R -City of Rancho Cucamonga 14 Fiscal Year 2011/12 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM An Assessment Diagram for the District is shown on the following page. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the County Assessor of the County San Bernardino, at the time this report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Engineer's Report. Landscape Maintenance District No. 6-R -City of Rancho Cucamonga 15 Fiscal Year 2011/12 cc N ~~ yr Q J N C ~ N N N (/~ c ,_ ~. N c c N rn 0 ~ A /UJa V y~ C d U ~ N ~ O ~ i._.._.._.._.. ~ r• J ~ r m ~ V i ~ o C .1 c 7 _ m ~ 1 ~ i p> ~ - t 3 e- ~ m a i o Q ! ~ I ~ _.._.. _ ' 'nb' 1se3 in i ' ~ my epueMll3 ny epueMll3 ~ i Q i V ~ 18 ~aaJ~ ea a .._.._.._.._.._ .._.._.i = ny Jalsayooa ny Jalsayooa J i.. ny ua~!II!W i._.._.._.._. _ ny ua~!II!W i i i ny uaneH i i ny uaneH i n esowJa ' y H ny esowJaH i ny PIeQ!yoJH : A`d PIe9!4oJH i ny uewllaH i ~,~,• "~ '' ny uewllaH 1 .~ r L ~' v ny p eE(auln 1S' UBIIaUJe`J `s.F ~ v~ F°e s e eE E[ 6~P £ y ~oe y L ~b g J - 3 t .`e~ 4~P ~ T .r~y3€~ P Y : ~~ ' ' f ~ N c m gg s~ r!~e6e yy ppi ~g i34 C~ ~ ?o = e yyy z~ E~~'~e9;'¢i$~ c~ e~§s~~~~Fig [$ U baSoeE~B~ ;!~0 ASSESSMENT ROLL Assessment Roll The assessment roll is a listing of the assessment for Fiscal Year 2011/12 apportioned to each lot or parcel, as shown on the last equalized roll of the Assessor of the County of San Bernardino. The following tables summarize the Fiscal Year 2011/12 maximum and actual assessments for the District: Maximum Allowable Maximum Property Type Assessment Rate Total Total Allowable Count Use Code er EBU UnitslAcres EBUs Assessment Single Family Residential $246.97 1,276 1,276 $315,133.72 Actual Property Type Assessment Rate Total Total Actual Coun Use Code er EBU UnitslAcres EBUs Assessment Single Family Residential $246.97 1,276 1,276 $315,133.72 A copy of the full assessment roll is available for review in the City Clerk's office. Annexations There were no annexations effective for the 2011/12 Fiscal Year: Landscape Maintenance District No. 6-R -City of Rancho Cucamonga 16 Fiscal Year 2011 /12 Revised Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2011/2012 City of Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 (North Etiwanda) CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 7 (NORTH ETIWANDA) 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Phone: 909.477.2740 Fax: 909.477.2741 CITY COUNCIL L. Dennis Michael, Mayor Sam Spagnolo, Mayor Pro Tem William Alexander, Council Member Chuck Buquet, Council Member Diane Williams, Council Member CITY STAFF John R. Gillison, Assistant City Manager Linda D. Daniels, Deputy City Manager William Wittkopf, Public Works Director Ingrid Y. Bruce, GIS/Special Districts Manager Christopher Bopko, Management Analyst III TABLE OF CONTENTS ENGINEER'S LETTER INTRODUCTION 1 3 Reason for Assessment .............................................................................................3 Process for Annual Assessment .................................................................................3 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS 5 Description of the Boundaries of the District ...............................................................5 Description of Improvements and Services ................................................................5 Map of Improvements ................................................................................................:9 ESTIMATE OF COSTS 10 District Budget ..........................................................................................................10 Definitions of Budget Items .......................................................................................11 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT 13 General ............................................................................ .........................................13 Special Benefit ................................................................ .........................................13 General Benefit ............................................................... .........................................14 Method of Assessment Spread ....................................... .........................................14 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM ASSESSMENT ROLL 16 17 Assessment Roll .......................................................................................................17 Annexations ..............................................................................................................17 ENGINEER'S LETTER WHEREAS, on ,the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 (the "1972 Act") adopted its Resolution No. _, a Resolution Initiating Proceedings for the Levy of Annual Assessments for Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 (North Etiwanda) (the "District"); and WHEREAS, the Resolution Initiating Proceedings directed NBS to prepare and file an Engineer's Report for Fiscal Year 2011/12 pursuant to the requirements of the 1972 Act. The Engineer's Report presents the plans and specifications describing the general nature, location and extent of the improvements to be maintained, an estimate of the costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements for the District for the referenced fiscal year, a diagram for the District, showing the area and properties proposed to be assessed, and an assessment of the estimated costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing the improvements, assessing the net amount upon all assessable lots and/or parcels within the District in proportion to the special benefit received; and NOW THEREFORE, the following assessment is proposed to be authorized in order to pay the estimated costs of maintenance, operation and servicing of the improvements to be paid by the assessable real property within the boundaries of the District in proportion to the special benefit received. The following table summarizes the proposed assessment. SUMMARY OF ASSESSMENT Fiscal Year 2011/12 Total Estimated Assessment $841,624.05 Less Anticipated Delinquencies 26 604.05 Total Estimated Revenue $615,020.00 Plus Reserve Fund Contribution 141 890.00 Total Expenditure Budget $956,910.00 Total District EBU Count 2,741.00 Actual Assessment per EBU $307.05 Maximum Allowable Assessment per EBU $307.05 In making the assessments contained herein pursuant to the 1972 Act: I have identified all parcels which will have a special benefit conferred upon them from the improvements described in the Special Benefit Section of this Engineer's Report (the "Specially Benefited Parcels"). For particulars as to the identification of said parcels, reference is made to the Assessment Diagram, a copy of which is included in this Engineer's Report. I have evaluated the costs and expenses of the improvements upon the Specially Benefited Parcels. In making such evaluation: Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2011112 a. The proportionate special benefit derived by each Specially Benefited Parcel from the improvements was determined in relationship to the entirety of the maintenance costs of the improvements; b. No assessment has been imposed on any Specially Benefited Parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on such parcel from the improvements; and c. Any general benefits from the improvements have been separated from the special benefits and only special benefits have been assessed. I, the undersigned, respectfully submit the enclosed Engineer's Report and, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, the Engineer's Report, Assessments, and the Assessment Diagram herein have been prepared and computed in accordance with the order of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Assessment Law. _" ~ ~ C Mark A. Steuer, City Engineer Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2011/12 INTRODUCTION Reason for Assessment Approval of the assessment covered by this Engineer's Report will generate the revenue necessary to: Provide for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements described in this Engineer's Report. Maintenance may include but is not limited to, all of the following: the repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement, providing for the life, growth, health and beauty of the landscaping, including cultivation, irrigation, trimming, spraying, fertilizing or treating for disease or injury, the removal of trimming, rubbish, debris and other solid waste, the maintenance, repair and replacement as necessary of all irrigation systems and the removal of graffiti from walls immediately adjacent to the cultivated areas. Servicing means the furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operating and servicing of any improvement. Servicing shall also include vehicle, equipment, capital improvements and administrative costs associated with the annual administration and operation of the District. Process for Annual Assessment The City cannot levy and collect annual assessments within the District without complying with the procedures specified in the 1972 Act. On an annual basis, an Engineer's Report must be prepared which contains a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the district. The City Council must also adopt a resolution of intention which: • Declares the intention of the City Council to levy and collect assessments within the assessment district for the fiscal year stated therein. • Generally describes the existing and proposed improvements and any substantial changes proposed to be made in existing improvements. • Refers to the assessment district by its distinctive designation and indicate the general location of the district. • Refers to the report of the engineer, on file with the clerk, for a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the district. • Gives notice of the time and place for public hearing by the City Council on the levy of the proposed assessment. • States whether the assessment is proposed to increase from the previous year. If the assessments are to be levied in the same or lesser amounts than the maximum assessment amount approved, the clerk shall give notice by causing the resolution of intention to be published. Any interested person may, prior to the conclusion of the public hearing, file a written protest which shall state all grounds of objection. The protest shall contain a description sufficient to identify the property owned by the property owner filing the protest. During the course or upon conclusion of the hearing, the City Council may order changes in any of the matters provided in the report, including changes in the improvements, any zones within the assessment district, and the proposed diagram or the proposed assessment. The City Council, upon conclusion of the public hearing must then adopt a resolution confirming the diagram and assessment, either as originally proposed or as changed by it. The adoption of the resolution shall constitute the levy of an assessment for the fiscal year referred to in the assessment. Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2011/12 If the assessment to be levied exceeds the maximum assessment amount previously approved, the City must comply with the procedures specified in Article XIIID and Proposition 218. The voters in the State of California in November 1996 added Article XIIID to the California Constitution imposing, among other requirements, the necessity for the City to conduct an assessment ballot procedure to enable the owners of each property on which assessments are proposed to be enacted or increased, the opportunity to express their support for, or opposition to the proposed assessment or increase in such assessment. The basic steps of the assessment ballot procedure are outlined below. The City must prepare a Notice of Public Hearing ("Notice'), which describes, along with other mandated information, the reason for the proposed assessments, and to provide a date and time of a public hearing to be held on the matter. The City must also prepare an assessment ballot, which clearly gives the property owner the ability to sign and mark their assessment ballot either in favor of, or in opposition to the proposed assessment. The Notice and assessment ballot are mailed to each affected property owner within the District a minimum of 45 days prior to the public hearing date as shown in the Notice. The City may also hold community meetings with the property owners to discuss the issues facing the District and to answer property owner questions directly. After the Notice and assessment ballot are mailed, property owners are given until the close of the public hearing, stated in the Notice, to return their signed and marked assessment ballot. During the public hearing, property owners are given the opportunity to address the City Council and ask questions or voice their concerns. At the public hearing, the returned assessment ballots received prior to the close of the public hearing are tabulated, weighted by the proposed assessment amount on each property and the results are announced by the City Council. Article XIIID provides that if, as a result of the assessment ballot proceeding, a majority protest is found to exist, the City Council shall not have the authority to levy and collect the assessments as proposed. A majority protest exists if the assessments represented by ballots submitted in opposition exceed those submitted in favor of the assessment. All returned ballots are tabulated and weighted according to the financial obligation of each particular parcel. If there is no majority protest as described above, the City Council may approve the proposed assessments. If there is a majority protest, as described above, the City will not levy and collect any assessments. Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2011 /12 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS The District provides for the administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing of various improvements located within the public right-of-way and dedicated easements within the boundaries of the District. tion of the Boundaries of the District The District is located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California. The boundaries of the District are generally described as that area of the City known as North Etiwanda, which is generally bounded by the 210 Freeway on the south, I-15 on the west, and City limits on the north. Typically parcels have been annexed to the District as they have developed. Reference is also made to the Assessment Diagram included in this Report. Description of Improvements and Services The improvements are the maintenance and servicing of landscaping sites and appurtenant facilities throughout the District. The various landscaping sites that are maintained consist of parkways, median islands, street trees, paseos and community trails located within street right-of-ways and dedicated public easements which are within the boundaries of the District. The landscaping maintenance includes, but is not limited to, shrubs, turt, tree trimming in irrigated City parkways and paseos, weed and pest control, landscape irrigation systems and testing, trash, debris and graffiti removal, and associated appurtenant facilities. Services include personnel, materials, contracting services, utilities, and all necessary costs associated with the maintenance, replacement and repair required to keep the improvements in a healthy, vigorous and satisfactory condition. In addition, it is the City's intention to continue to use cost effective materials, including the future ability to replace landscaping with drought resistant or low water use plants, in order to lower expenses of the District. The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows: Parks: Etiwanda Creek Park. Site # Descriptive Location EN-1 The North side of Wilson from San Sevaine to Ridgeline: The Eastside of Ridgeline from Wilson to Arcadia, the south side of Arcadia from Ridgeline to 77 feet east of Ridgeline. Ground Cover area: 27,325 square feet Turf area: 19,334 square feet Hardscape area: 840 square feet EN-2 The Metropolitan Water District easement on the south side of Crescents Way from San Marino to Ridgeline. Ground Cover area: 38,104 square feet Turf area: 41,250 square feet Hardscape area: 9,000 square feet EN-3 The Wilson Median from Wardman Bullock to San Sevaine. Ground Cover area: 9,016 square feet Hardscape area: 11, 088 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2011/12 EN-4 The Planters on the north side of the drainage easement that is between and parallel to Highland and Arapaho east of Etiwanda Ave. Ground Cover area: 63,972 square feet EN-5 The south side of Wilson from 1,115 feet west of San Sevaine to 205 feet east of San Sevaine. The Landscape east of San Sevaine from 24th to south end tract. Ground Cover area: 45,584 square feet Turf area: 3,527 square feet EN-6 The north side of Wilson from Wardman Bullock to Ridgeline. The west side of Ridgeline from Wilson to 120 feet north of Arcadia. Ground Cover area: 29,226 square feet Turf area: 15,136 square feet Hardscape area: 1,300 square feet EN-7 The parkway on the eastside of Wardman Bullock from 24th street to 857 feet north of Glendora. The cobblestone between the tract wall and the flood wall will be handled as extra for debris pickup and weed control on an as needed basis. Ground Cover area: 10,268 square feet Hardscape area: 31,549 square feet EN-8 The south side of Crescenta Way from Ridgeline to Crestline. Ground Cover area: 50,305 square feet Turf area: 35,960 square feet Hardscape area: 10,000 square feet EN-9 The paseo from Meadow Brook to Rock Creek Road. Ground Cover area: 1,400 square feet Turf area: 6,555 square feet Hardscape area: 2,820 square feet EN-10 The paseo from Etiwanda to North Rim Way. The west side of Etiwanda from 175 feet north of North Rim Way to 171 feet south of Golden Prairie Drive. Ground Cover area: 49,020 square feet Turt area: 4,445 square feet Hardscape area: 13,026 square feet EN-11 The paseo south of Ridge Crest Drive to southern boundary of Tract 14139. This site is temporarily maintained by another contractor and was deleted from the contract as of 7- 16-01, however, this site is still the city's property. Ground Cover area: 3,548 square feet Turf area: 800 square feet Hardscape area: 4,280 square feet EN-12 The cul-de-sac on the north side of Ridgecrest at Etiwanda Creek Channel. Ground Cover area: 1,870 square feet Turf area: 700 square feet Hardscape area: 450 square feet EN-13 The east side of San Sevaine from Wilson to 136 feet north of Crescenta. Ground Cover area: 46,611 square feet Turt area: 5,037 square feet EN-14 The west side of San Sevaine from 150' north of Wilson to 136' north of Crescenta. Ground Cover area: 55,166 square feet Turf area: 235 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 6 Fiscal Year 2011/12 Hardscape area: 6,975 square feet EN-15 The north side of Youngs Canyon Road from 500 feet east of Koch to 692 feet west of Koch. The south side of Youngs Canyon Road from 349 feet east of Koch to 692 feet west of Koch. The east and west side of Koch place from Youngs Canyon Road to 132 feet north of Youngs Canyon Road. The west side of Koch from Youngs Canyon Road to 132 feet south of Youngs Canyon Road. The east side of Koch from 82 feet south of Youngs Canyon Road to Youngs Canyon Road. The trailhead north east of the east end of Youngs Canyon Road to the south end of San Sevaine Horse Trail. The south end of San Sevaine Horse from the trail head to 254 feet north of trailhead. Ground Cover area: 42,925 square feet Hardscape area: 14,308 square feet EN-16 The east side of Wardman Bullock from 225 feet south of San Segundo Drive to 80 feet north of Dona Way. Ground Cover area: 2,056 square feet Hardscape area: 3,450 square feet EN-17 The north side of Colonbero from San Sevaine Channel to Guiders Drive. The south side of Colonbero from San Sevaine Channel to 400 feet north of Guidera Drive. The north side of Aggazzotti from Colonbero to 475 feet east of Colonbero. This site has a pump which will be adjusted and maintained by city personnel. Ground Cover area: 43,241 square feet Hardscape area: 29,125 square feet EN-18 The north side of Aggazzotti Road from San Antonio Drive to San Sevaine Road. The west side of San Sevaine road from Aggazzotti to 702 feet south of Aggazzotti. The East side of San Sevaine Road from 702 feet south of Aggazzotti to Regina. Ground Cover area: 47,823 square feet Hardscape area: 30,986 square feet EN-19 The south side of Wilson from Etiwanda to Estates Way. Ground Cover area: 45,727 square feet Hardscape area: 19,229 square feet EN-20 The east side of Bluegrass from 190 feet south of Vista Verde Dr. to Wilson Avenue. The south side of Wilson Avenue from Bluegrass Avenue to Estates Way Ground Cover area: 85,155 square feet Hardscape area: 48,784 square feet EN-21 The north side of Wilson from Etiwanda to Cervantes. The Wilson median from Etiwanda To Cervantes. The Westside of Etiwanda From Wilson To Del Norte Place. Ground Cover area: 88,795 square feet Hardscape area: 27,128 square feet EN-22 The north and south side of Vintage from 165 feet east of Country View to 338 feet west of Country View. Ground Cover area: 13,603 square feet Hardscape area: 7,365 square feet EN-23 The north side of Wilson and median from Etiwanda west to Etiwanda. The eastside of Etiwanda from Wilson to 1150 feet north of Wilson. Ground Cover area: 32,027 square feet Hardscape area: 29,567 square feet EN-24 The north side of Vintage from 360 feet west of Ascot to 230 feet east of Countrywood. Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2011/12 Ground Cover area: 34,707 square feet Hardscape area: 92,600 square feet EN-25 The eastside of Blueg rass from Banyan to 610 feet north of Banyan. Ground Cover area: 4,054 square feet Hardscape area: 5,819 square feet EN-26 The south side of Banyan from Bluegrass to Greenwood. Ground Cover area: 6,240 square feet Hardscape area: 3,200 square feet EN-27 The south side of Banyan from Laurel Blossom to Etiwanda. Ground Cover area: 1,703 square feet Hardscape area: 8,417 square feet EN-28 The north side of Wilson from Cervantes to 1715 feet west of Cervantes. The west side of Cervantes from Carmel Knolls Drive to Wilson. The paseo from Wilson to Tejas Ct. The median on Wilson from Cervantes to Bluegrass. The following temporary landscape: There is 1 planter on the west side of Altura at Tejas. There are five planters on the south side of Tejas from Altura to 195 feet east of Altura. Ground Cover area: 25,048 square feet Hardscape area: 22,532 square feet EN-29 The south side of Banyan from 787 feet west of East Av. to East Av...The west side of East Avenue from Banyan to 600 feet south of Blue Gum. The east side of East Ave. from Banyan to 537 feet south of Banyan. Ground cover area: 16,111 square feet Hardscape area: 15,774 square feet EN-30 The east side of Bluegrass Ave from 257 feet south of Churchill Drive to 418 feet north of Churchill Drive. Ground Cover area: 9,303 square feet Hardscape area: 5,302 square feet EN-31 The south side of Banyan Ave. from 375 feet south of Cashew Way to Rose Way. The north side of Banyan Ave. from 435 feet west of Peak PI. to Wardman Bullock Rd. Ground cover area: 53,000 square feet Hardscape area: 26,855 square feet EN-32 The landscaping south of the equestrian trail from 210 feet west of Grovewood PI. to 1,170 feet east of Grovewood PI. Ground cover area: 6,900 square feet EN-33 The north side of Youngs Canyon Rd. from 600 feet east of Banyan Ave. to Banyan Ave. The east side of Wardman Bullock Rd. from Banyan Ave. to Wilson Ave. The south side of Wilson Ave. from Wardman Bullock Rd. to 635 feet east of Fields PI. Ground cover area: 66,601 square feet Hardscape area: 46,332 square feet EN-34 The west side of Wardman Bullock Rd. from Wilson Ave. to Banyan Ave. Parkview Way from Wardman Bullock Rd. to Soledad Way. Ground cover area: 56,314 square feet Hardscape area: 28,428 square feet EN-35 The north side of Day Creek Blvd. from Etiwanda Ave. to Indian Wells Place. Ground cover area: 160,737 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2011/12 Hardscape area: 128,254 square feet EN-36 The south side of Day Creek from 380 feet north of Coyote to Etiwanda. The west side of Etiwanda from Day Creek to 170 feet north of North Rim. The hydro seeded landscape area inside the catch basin on the corner of Day Creek and Etiwanda. The west side of Day Creek from 380 feet north of Coyote to Indian Wells. Ground cover area: 58,398 square feet Hardscape area: 68,127 square feet EN-37 The east side of East Av. from 235 feet south of Hunt Club Dr. to 375 feet north of Hunt Club Dr. Ground cover area. Hardscape: EN-38 The west side of Ea: Ground cover area: Hardscape area: 5,559 square feet 5,231 square feet .t Ave. from 236 feet north of Philly Dr. to 245 feet south of Philly Dr 4,605 square feet 3,394 square feet Ground cover, shrubs and turf areas that make up parkways, median islands and paseos are maintained under contract by a private landscape maintenance company. Parks are maintained by the City's Park Maintenance Crews. Map of Improvements The following page shows the map of landscaping improvements, including irrigation sites and community trails, to be maintained using District funds. Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2011/12 ~ °d z o ~O, a ~ s~ g w ~ w a ~ w ~ z z ~ w o o ~ r a ~y ~ a a Q ~, ~ Q~ ~ ~ w U 9/ Q ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Q W ~ s~ o o : a ~y ' I 1 I I ~ r 0 ~ Q w Z ~.~ o 4 N ~ ~ ~s~~ - .~ ~ ~ ~ db ~~O~1f18 NNWa2~tfM ~ a o- ~ ~ z ti ~~ ~ o ., 0 ., o Q a r Z Q m nv lsd3 0 ~r, J QZ CV ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ o /~ ~ nb'b'4NtfM113 1 nVt/4NtlMIl3 ndbmN`dM113 N •V J 0 N `FFF °Q ]F. E'~ c =~s~ SF F EY~~ ~•ii~ ~E~p ~g$ ~ $~~F84 $F aSa z:o 18N332i~.1b'a Q gpa;~s~~ Fp=s= Q O J z£s~S~~F~@~3 ~~~A ..:~ o = 8Q~ Dsaa~~ee~'~~8 1 ~~ C7. ;s•g g gg E~5gs~= O N aF7~~5~~YYFs$sy './J Ea iV€Egxy&ay~~II~&E g4 ESTIMATE OF COSTS The estimated costs of administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing the improvements as described in the Plans and Specifications are summarized below. Each year, as part of the assessment district levy calculation process, the costs and expenses are reviewed and the annual costs are projected for the following fiscal year. District Estimated 2011/12 Bud et Personnel Services Re ularSalaries $171,640.00 Part-time Salaries 10,380.00 Frin a Benefits 81 810.00 Subtotal Personnel $263,830.00 O erations and Maintenance O erations and Maintenance $46,660.00 O erations and Maintenance Facilities 1,000.00 Vehicle O erations and Maintenance 2,500.00 Contract Services 299,860.00 Tree Maintenance 6,950.00 Utilities Water Utilities 234,450.00 Electric Utilities 26,790.00 Tele hone 1,530.00 Assessment Administration 15,080.00 General Overhead 58 260.00 Subtotal O erations and Maintenance $693,080.00 Ca ital Ex enditures Ca ital Pro'ects 0.00 Subtotal Ca ital Ex enditures $0.00 Total District Ex enditure Bud et $956,910.00 Total Estimated Assessment $841,624.05 Less Anticipated Delinquencies 26 604.05 Total Estimated Revenue $815,020.00 Plus Operating Reserve Fund Contribution 141 890.00 Total Expenditure Budget $956,910.00 Total Estimated Assessment . $841,624.05 Total District EBU Count 2,741.00 Actual Assessment er EBU -Fiscal Year 2011/12 $307.05 Maximum Allowable Assessment er EBU -Fiscal Year 2011/12 $307.05 The maximum allowable assessment per EBU listed in the District budget above, is the amount which was approved in 1996/97 and subsequent District annexations. Each year, prior to the assessments being placed on the tax roll, the City will review the budget and determine the amount needed to Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 10 Fiscal Year 2011/12 maintain the improvements for the upcoming fiscal year. The actual assessment per EBU will be based on the estimated costs of maintenance, available fund balance and maximum allowable assessment with the goal of maintaining the improvements in a satisfactory and healthy condition. The actual assessment amount may be lower than the maximum allowable assessment; however it may not exceed the maximum unless the increase is approved by the property owners in accordance with Proposition 218. It is the intent of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to maintain an Operating Reserve which shall not exceed the estimated costs of maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or when the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The reserve balance information for the District is as follows: Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2011 Reserve Fund Balance $804,128.02 Operating Reserve Contribution -Fiscal Year 2011/12 (141,890.00) Ooerating Reserve Collection -Fiscal Year 2011/12 0.00 Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2012 Reserve Fund Balance $662,238.02 Definitions of Budget Items The following definitions describe the costs and expenses included in the District Budget Personnel Services Regular Salaries: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all full-time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Part Time Salaries: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all part time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Fringe Benefits: This item includes the benefits available to City employees: health care, vacation, sick time, and retirement fund. Operations and Maintenance Contract Services: This item includes the contract costs of a landscape maintenance company responsible for the ongoing maintenance of the District improvements. Tree Maintenance: This item includes the contract costs attributed to maintaining the street trees and other trees throughout the District. Utilities -Water: This item includes the costs to furnish water for the landscaping within the District. Utilities -Electric: This item includes the costs to furnish electricity required for the operation and maintenance of the sprinklers and irrigation controllers. Assessment Administration: This item includes the cost to all particular departments and staff of the City, and consultants for providing the administration, coordination and management of District services, operations, and incidental expenses related to the District. This item also includes creation of an annual engineer's report, resolutions and placing the assessment amounts onto the County tax roll each year, along with responding to any public inquiries and future Proposition 218 balloting proceedings. Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 11 Fiscal Year 2011 /12 General Overhead: This item includes the costs of all departments and staff of the City for providing the coordination of District services, inspections, annual bid management, responding to public concerns, public education, accounting, auditing and procedural matters associated with the District. This item also includes an allocation for general City staff time for administrative functions and systems that provide for a functional and operational assessment district within the City's administrative structure. Capital Expenditures: Capital Projects: This item includes new improvements to further enhance the level and quality of service provided within the boundaries of the District. This may include new monuments, irrigation systems, and other large improvements. Operating Reserve Collection: Ooeratino Reserve Collection: This item includes the amount to be collected to maintain reserves to enable the City to pay for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or whenever the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The Reserve Fund contribution will continue until such a time the Reserve Fund balance is approximately one half of the annual costs. The fund may be allowed to accumulate in anticipation of any unforeseen expenses not included in the yearly maintenance costs. This may include, but is not limited to, tree replacements, repair of damaged equipment due to vandalism, storms and other similar events. Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 12 Fiscal Year 2011/12 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT General Pursuant to the 1972 Act and Article XIIID, all parcels that have a special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements and services shall be identified, and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel shall be determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of improvements. The 1972 Act, permits the establishment of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include the operation, maintenance and servicing of landscaping improvements. Section 22573 of the 1972 Act requires that maintenance assessments must be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. This Section states: "The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district maybe apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements." The determination of whether or not a lot or parcel will benefit from the improvements shall be made pursuant to the Improvement Act of 1911 (Division 7 (commencing with Section 5000) (of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California]." The 1972 Act also permits the designation of zones of benefit within any individual assessment district if "by reasons or variations in the nature, locatiori, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive different degrees of benefit from the improvement" (Sec. 22547). Article XIIID, Section 4(a) of the California Constitution limits the amount of any assessment to the proportional special benefit conferred on the property. Article XIIID also provides that publicly owned properties must be assessed unless there is clear and convincing evidence that those properties receive no special benefit from the assessment. Exempted from the assessment would be the areas of public streets, public avenues, public lanes, public roads, public drives, public courts, public alleys, public easements and rights-of-ways, public greenbelts and public parkways. The net amount to be assessed may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels. Proposition 218, approved by the voters in November 1996, requires the City to separate general benefit from special benefit, where only special benefit is assessed. Benefit The maintenance and servicing of the improvements within the District (which are described in the Description of Services and Improvements Section of this report) are for the benefit of the properties within the District, and as such confer a special and direct benefit to parcels within the District by: • improving the livability, appearance, and desirability for properties within the boundaries of the District, and • ensuring that improvements do not reach a state of deterioration or disrepair so as to be materially detrimental to properties within the District, and Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 13 Fiscal Year 2011/12 • providing beautification, shade and overall enhancement to properties within the District. The above mentioned items affect the assessed property in a way that is particular and distinct from their effect on other parcels and that real property in general and the public at large do not share. They contribute to a specific enhancement of the properties within the District. Since these improvements, including the community trails, were installed and are maintained specifically for the properties within the District; only properties within the District receive a special benefit and are assessed for said maintenance. General Benefit In addition to the special benefits received by parcels within the District, there are derivative general benefits that are conferred on parcels outside the boundaries of the District which include: • the control of dust and insect infestations, and • the visual enhancement of the area to persons or vehicles that may travel through the District. However it has been determined that these benefits are derivative and do not provide a direct benefit to parcels outside of the district that are not being assessed. Method of Assessment Spread Each of the parcels within the District is deemed to receive special benefit from the improvements. Each parcel that has a special benefit conferred upon it as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements are identified and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel is determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of the improvements. When the District was formed in 1989, Article XIIID and Proposition 218 had not yet been passed. Upon the passage of Article XIIID and the subsequent passage of the Proposition Omnibus Implementation Act, new rules were put into place. Due to the changes in legal requirements, as property annexed to the District after the passage of the Assessment Law, the description of the method of assessment became more refined, however, the assessment per parcel has remained the same since the 1996/97 Fiscal Year. Further, no parcel included in the District formation or annexations prior to when the language was refined, are now being levied differently than they were at the time the District was formed or the parcels were annexed. To assess special benefit appropriately, it is necessary to relate the different type of parcel improvements to each other. The Equivalent Benefit Unit ("EBU") method of apportionment uses the single family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single family home equals one Equivalent Benefit Unit (EBU). Every other land-use is converted to EBUs based on an assessment formula that equates to the property's specific development status, type of development (land-use), and size of the property, as compared to a single family home. Vacant parcels are assigned an EBU value of 0.25 per acre because they receive a lesser benefit from the improvements until such time as development occurs. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land-use types, as assigned by County use code, to determine each parcel's EBU assignment. Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 14 Fiscal Year 2011/12 Land-Use E uivalent Dwellin Units Pro ert T e Count Use Code EBU Value Multi lier Single Family Residential 1.00 Dwelling Unit The use of the latest County Assessor's Secured Roll shall be the basis for the Property Type determination and units/acreage assignments, unless better data is available to the City. In addition,. if any parcel within the District is identified by the County Auditor/Controller to bean invalid parcel number for the current fiscal year, the Property Type and EBU assignment shall be based on the correct parcel number and/or new parcel number(s) County use code and subsequent property information. If a single parcel has changed to multiple parcels, the EBU assignment and assessment amount applied to each of the new parcels will be recalculated rather than spread the proportionate share of the original assessment. The following table summarizes the Fiscal Year 2011/12 maximum allowable assessment rates for the District: Maximum Allowable Property Type (County assessment Rate Actual Assessment Total Total Use Code) er EBU Rate per EBU UnitslAcres EBUs Single Family Residential $307.05 $307.05 2,741 2,741 The total amount of maintenance and incidental costs for maintaining the landscaping and community trail improvements is assessed to the individual parcels of real property within the District in proportion to the special benefit received by such parcels of real property. The proposed individual assessments are shown on the assessment roll in this report. Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 15 Fiscal Year 2011/12 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM An Assessment Diagram for the District is shown on the following page. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the County Assessor of the County San Bernardino, at the time this report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Engineer's Report. Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 16 Fiscal Year 2011/12 ~1.+ V 'i .y V A~ W yr .~ V J ny ua~!II!W ny uaneH ny esou»aH ny PIeG!4oat1 ny ueuallaH iS uellau~e~ ny ti~a4~ v N C _ J m ~ N z 3 ~ o ~ m ~i Q a~ ~~ 0 0 N O I` J Q ~' = U ~ ~ r~ J ti•r n`d ~Se3 in v • ~ AtJ ePUeMI;~ ny ~a;sayoo~ ~~ ny as;sayoo~ ny ua~ill!W any uaneF{ i nd esow~aH i j nd Pleq!4~~d I ~.r' ~ ny ueuallaH r'• ~ r ~ ~ v ~ ~ ny p e~(awn '"~ _ .D ~ - .•~ ~ ~ .._:-•ti..-..--- •-• -~ ny anal ~ ~¢8 ~ ~g~~ ~ £~ _ :~ ~~ ~~opEFaaP ~a~~9~~~~gg dt~c~i~€2ie ASSESSMENT ROLL Assessment Roll The assessment roll is a listing of the assessment for Fiscal Year 2011/12 apportioned to each lot or parcel, as shown on the last equalized roll of the Assessor of the County of San Bernardino. The following tables summarize the Fiscal Year 2011/12 maximum and actual assessments for the District: Maximum Allowable Maximum Property Type (County Assessment Rate Total Total Allowable Use Code er EBU Units/Acres EBUs Assessment Single Family Residential $307.05 2,741 2,741 $841,624.05 Actual Property Type (County Assessment Rate Total Total Actual Use Code er EBU UnitslAcres EBUs Assessment Single Family Residential $307.05 2,741 2,741 $841,624.05 A copy of the full assessment roll is available for review in the City Clerk's office. Annexations There were no annexations effective for the 2011/12 Fiscal Year: Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 17 Fiscal Year 2011/12 Revised Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2011/2012 City of Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 (South Etiwanda) CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 8 (SOUTH ETIWANDA) 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Phone: 909.477.2740 Fax: 909.477.2741 CITY COUNCIL L. Dennis Michael, Mayor Sam Spagnolo, Mayor Pro Tem William Alexander, Council Member Chuck Buquet, Council Member Diane Williams, Council Member CITY STAFF John R. Gillison, Assistant City Manager Linda D. Daniels, Deputy City Manager William Wittkopf, Public Works Director Ingrid Y. Bruce, GIS/Special Districts Manager Christopher Bopko, Management Analyst III TABLE OF CONTENTS ENGINEER'S LETTER INTRODUCTION 1 3 Reason for Assessment .............................................................................................3 Process for Annual Assessment .................................................................................3 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS 5 Description of the Boundaries of the District ...............................................................5 Description of Improvements and Services ................................................................5 Map of Improvements .................................................................................................6 ESTIMATE OF COSTS 7 District Budget ............................................................................................................7 Definitions of Budget Items .........................................................................................8 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT 10 General .....................................................................................................................10 Special Benefit .........................................................................................................10 General Benefit ........................................................................................................11 Method of Assessment Spread ................................................................................11 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM ASSESSMENT ROLL 13 14 Assessment Roll .......................................................................................................14 Annexations ..............................................................................................................14 ENGINEER'S LETTER WHEREAS, on ,the City Council, under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 (the "1972 Act") adopted its Resolution No. _, a Resolution Initiating Proceedings for the Levy of Annual Assessments for Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 (South Etiwanda); and WHEREAS, the Resolution Initiating Proceedings directed NBS to prepare and file an Engineer's Report for Fiscal Year 2011/12 pursuant to the requirements of the 1972 Act. The Engineer's Report presents the plans and specifications describing the general nature, location and extent of the improvements to be maintained, an estimate of the costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements for the District for the referenced fiscal year, a diagram for the District, showing the area and properties proposed to be assessed, and an assessment of the estimated costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing the improvements, assessing the net amount upon all assessable lots and/or parcels within the District in proportion to the special benefit received; and NOW THEREFORE, the following assessment is proposed to be authorized in order to pay the estimated costs of maintenance, operation and servicing of the improvements to be paid by the assessable real property within the boundaries of the District in proportion to the special benefit received. The following table summarizes the proposed assessment. SUMMARY OF ASSESSMENT Fiscal Year 2011/12 Total Estimated Assessment $28,624.05 Less Anticipated Delinquencies 1 114.05 Total Estimated Revenue $27,510.00 Plus Reserve Fund Contribution 6 130.00 Total Expenditure Budget $21,380.00 Total District EBU Count 189.00 Actual Assessment per EBU $151.45 Maximum Allowable Assessment per EBU $151.45 In making the assessments contained herein pursuant to the 1972 Act: I have identified all parcels which will have a special benefit conferred upon them from the improvements described in the Special Benefit Section of this Engineer's Report (the "Specially Benefited Parcels"). For particulars as to the identification of said parcels, reference is made to the Assessment Diagram, a copy of which is included in this Engineer's Report. 2. I have evaluated the costs and expenses of the improvements upon the Specially Benefited Parcels. In making such evaluation: a. The proportionate special benefit derived by each Specially Benefited Parcel from the improvements was determined in relationship to the entirety of the maintenance costs of the improvements; Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2011 /12 b. No assessment has been imposed on any Specially Benefited Parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on such parcel from the improvements; and c. Any general benefits from the improvements have been separated from the special benefits and only special benefits have been assessed. I, the undersigned, respectfully submit the enclosed Engineer's Report and, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, the Engineer's Report, Assessments, and the Assessment Diagram herein have been prepared and computed in accordance with the order of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the 1972 Act, Article XIII D of the Constitution of the State of California ("Article XIII D") and the Proposition 218 Omnibus Implementation Act ("Proposition 218"), (the 1972 Act, Article XIII D and Proposition 218 are collectively referred to as the "Assessment Law"). Mark A Steuer, City Engineer Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2011/12 INTRODUCTION Reason for Assessment Approval of the assessment covered by this Engineer's Report will generate the revenue necessary to: Provide for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements described in this Engineer's Report. Maintenance may include but is not limited to, all of the following: the repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement, providing for the life, growth, health and beauty of the landscaping, including cultivation, irrigation, trimming, spraying, fertilizing or treating for disease or injury, the removal of trimming, rubbish, debris and other solid waste, the maintenance, repair and replacement as necessary of all irrigation systems and the removal of graffiti from walls immediately adjacent to the cultivated areas. Servicing means the furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operating and servicing of any improvement. Servicing shall also include vehicle, equipment, capital improvements and administrative costs associated with the annual administration and operation of the District. Process for Annual Assessment The City cannot levy and collect annual assessments within the District without complying with the procedures specified in the 1972 Act. On an annual basis, an Engineer's Report must be prepared which contains a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the district. The City Council must also adopt a resolution of intention which: • Declares the intention of the City Council to levy and collect assessments within the assessment district for the fiscal year stated therein. • Generally describes the existing and proposed improvements and any substantial changes proposed to be made in existing improvements. • Refers to the assessment district by its distinctive designation and indicate the general location of the district. • Refers to the report of the engineer, on file with the clerk, for a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the district. • Gives notice of the time and place for public hearing by the City Council on the levy of the proposed assessment. • States whether the assessment is proposed to increase from the previous year. If the assessments are to be levied in the same or lesser amounts than the maximum assessment amount approved, the clerk shall give notice by causing the resolution of intention to be published. Any interested person may, prior to the conclusion of the public hearing, file a written protest which shall state all grounds of objection. The protest shall contain a description sufficient to identify the property owned by the property owner filing the protest. During the course or upon conclusion of the hearing, the City Council may order changes in any of the matters provided in the report, including changes in the improvements, any zones within the assessment district, and the proposed diagram or the proposed assessment. Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2011/12 The City Council, upon conclusion of the public hearing must then adopt a resolution confirming the diagram and assessment, either as originally proposed or as changed by it. The adoption of the resolution shall constitute the levy of an assessment for the fiscal year referred to in the assessment If the assessment to be levied exceeds the maximum assessment amount previously approved, the City must comply with the procedures specified in Article XIII D and Proposition 218. The voters in the State of California in November 1996 added Article XIII D to the California Constitution imposing, among other requirements, the necessity for the City to conduct an assessment ballot procedure to enable the owners of each property on which assessments are proposed to be enacted or increased, the opportunity to express their support for, or opposition to the proposed assessment or increase in such assessment. The basic steps of the assessment ballot procedure are outlined below. The City must prepare a Notice of Public Hearing ("Notice"), which describes, along with other mandated information, the reason for the proposed assessments, and to provide a date and time of a public hearing to be held on the matter. The City must also prepare an assessment ballot, which clearly gives the property owner the ability to sign and mark their assessment ballot either in favor of, or in opposition to the proposed assessment. The Notice and assessment ballot are mailed to each affected property owner within the District a minimum of 45 days prior to the public hearing date as shown in the Notice. The City may also hold community meetings with the property owners to discuss the issues facing the District and to answer property owner questions directly. After the Notice and assessment ballot are mailed, property owners are given until the close of the public hearing, stated in the Notice, to return their signed and marked assessment ballot. During the public hearing, property owners are given the opportunity to address the City Council and ask questions or voice their concerns. At the public hearing, the returned assessment ballots received prior to the close of the public hearing are tabulated, weighted by the proposed assessment amount on each property and the results are announced by the City Council. Article XIII D provides that if, as a result of the assessment ballot proceeding, a majority protest is found to exist, the City Council shall not have the authority to levy and collect the assessments as proposed. A majority protest exists if the assessments represented by ballots submitted in opposition exceed those submitted in favor of the assessment. All returned ballots are tabulated and weighted according to the financial obligation of each particular parcel. If there is no majority protest as described above, the City Council may approve the proposed assessments. If there is a majority protest, as described above, the City will not levy and collect any assessments. Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2011/12 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS The District provides for the administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing of various improvements located within the public right-of-way and dedicated easements within the boundaries of the District. Description of the Boundaries of the District The District is located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California. The boundaries of the District are generally described as that area known as South Etiwanda, which is south of the I-210 Freeway along Fisher Drive, east of East Avenue, including the south side of Highstone Manor Court, the south side of Smokestone Street, and to the San Bernardino County Flood Control drainage basin on east side. Typically parcels have been annexed to the District as they have developed. Reference is also made to the Assessment Diagram included in this Report. Description of Improvements and Services The improvements are the maintenance and servicing of landscaping sites and appurtenant facilities throughout the District. The various landscaping sites that are maintained consist of parkways, median islands, street trees, paseos and community trails located within street right-of-ways and dedicated public easements which are within the boundaries of the District. The landscaping maintenance includes, but is not limited to, shrubs, turf, tree trimming in irrigated City parkways and paseos, weed and pest control, landscape irrigation systems and testing, trash, debris and graffiti removal, and associated appurtenant facilities. Services include personnel, materials, contracting services, utilities, and all necessary costs associated with the maintenance, replacement and repair required to keep the improvements in a healthy, vigorous and satisfactory condition. In addition, it is the City's intention to continue to use cost effective materials, including the future ability to replace landscaping with drought resistant or low water use plants, in order to lower expenses of the District. The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows: Site # Descriptive Location SE-1 The east side of East Ave. from 480 feet south of Catalpa St. to 182 feet north of Catalpa St. The north and south side of Catalpa St. from East Ave. to Brownstone PI. Ground Cover area: 10,355 square feet Turt area: 6,258 square feet Hardscape area: 4,050 square feet SE-2 The south side of Fisher Dr. from 361 feet east of East Ave. to 210 feet east of Starstone PI. Ground Cover area: 9,366 square feet Hardscape area: 4,074 square feet SE-3 The south side of Fisher Dr. from 860 feet west of Mulberry St. to Mulberry St. Ground Cover area: 3,676 square feet Hardscape area: 6,910 square feet Total Ground Cover: 23,397 square feet Total Turf: 6,258 square feet Total Hardscape: 15,034 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Prepared by NBS -Fiscal Year 2011112 Ground cover, shrubs and turf areas that make up parkways, median islands and paseos are maintained under contract by a private landscape maintenance company. Parks are maintained by the City's Park Maintenance Crews Map of Improvements The following page shows the map of landscaping improvements, including irrigation sites and community trails, to be maintained using District funds. Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Prepared by NBS -Fiscal Year 2011/12 a W ~ Z_ ~ UJ ~ J N W cP~ ?/ W Z Z ~ ~ ~ m ~ w~~ ~_ Y °O O w U ~~~. Q~ w~ Q~ Q~ Q °~~, ~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ I ~ O D ~~ ,~r 0 s cn CJ's`' ~ DO ~ N ~ ~ 2 ~4.r 'i w ~~ ~ O~ m ~w _ ~ ~ a ~ ~ _~ o N ~ ~ ; o ~ .~ 0 r' ~ N V ~ y ~ O Q a `~ c o U J > N O _o N `a4°^°£ E E E e e~ c v ~c ~' ~° e g p E ~u-E58_a So Ems- o~ E~Sx~o~~5a~g~p" r U ° E ~ ~° & ~ m ~ ~ ~ ~ E o A a» as~goa'oSgEn~: /~t/1Sd3 °QVOOyp~cViE'Lo~a~+ J C7 `~`„~~~`e a ESTIMATE OF COSTS The estimated costs of administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing the improvements as described in the Plans and Specifications are summarized below. Each year, as part of the assessment district levy calculation process, the costs and expenses are reviewed and the annual costs are projected for the following fiscal year. District Budget Estimated 2011/12 Budget Personnel Services Regular Salaries $0.00 Pad-time Salaries 0.00 Fringe Benefits 0.00 Subtotal Personnel $0.00 Operations and Maintenance Operations and Maintenance $0.00 Emergency Equipment and Vehicle Rental 0.00 Contract Services 8,350.00 Tree Maintenance 4,300.00 Utilities Water Utilities 4,410.00 Electric Utilities 1,310.00 Assessment Administration 1,040.00 General Overhead 1 970.00 Subtotal Operations and Maintenance $21,380.00 Capital Expenditures Capital Projects 0.00 Subtotal Capital Expenditures $0.00 Total District Expenditure Budget ~ $21,380.00 Total Estimated Assessment $28,824.05 Less Anticipated Delinquencies 1 11 14.051 Total Estimated Revenue $27,510.00 Less Operating Reserve Fund Collection 6 11 30.00) Total Expenditure Budget $21,360.00 Total Estimated Assessment $28,624.05 Total District EBU Count 189.00 Actual Assessment per EBU -Fiscal Year 2011/12 $151.45 Maximum Allowable Assessment per EBU -Fiscal Year 2011/12 $151.45 The maximum allowable assessment per EBU listed in the District budget above, is the amount which was approved in 1989/90, when the District was formed, and subsequent District annexations. Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Prepared by NBS -Fiscal Year 2011/12 Each year, prior to the assessments being placed on the tax roll, the City will review the budget and determine the amount needed to maintain the improvements for the upcoming fiscal year. The actual assessment per EBU will be based on the estimated costs of maintenance, available fund balance and maximum allowable assessment with the goal of maintaining the improvements in a satisfactory and healthy condition. The actual assessment amount may be lower than the maximum allowable assessment; however it may not exceed the maximum unless the increase is approved by the property owners in accordance with Proposition 218. It is the intent of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to maintain an Operating Reserve which shall not exceed the estimated costs of maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or when the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The reserve balance information for the District is as follows: Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2011 Reserve Fund Balance $21,928.69 Operating Reserve Contribution -Fiscal Year 2011/12 0.00 Ooeratina Reserve Collection -Fiscal Year 2011/12 6.130.00 Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2072 Reserve Fund Balance $28,058.69 Definitions of Budget Items The following definitions describe the costs and expenses included in the District Budget: Operations and Maintenance Contract Services: This item includes the contract costs of a landscape maintenance company responsible for the ongoing maintenance of the District improvements. Tree Maintenance: This item includes the contract costs attributed to maintaining the street trees and other trees throughout the District. Utilities -Water: This item includes the costs to furnish water for the landscaping within the District. Utilities -Electric: This item includes the costs to furnish electricity required for the operation and maintenance of the sprinklers and irrigation controllers. Assessment Administration: This item includes the cost to all particular departments and staff of the City, and consultants for providing the administration, coordination and management of District services, operations, and incidental expenses related to the District. This item also includes creation of an annual engineer's report, resolutions and placing the assessment amounts onto the County tax roll each year, along with responding to any public inquiries and future Proposition 218 balloting proceedings. General Overhead: This item includes the costs of all departments and staff of the City for providing the coordination of District services, inspections, annual bid management, responding to public concerns, public education, accounting, auditing and procedural matters associated with the District. This item also includes an allocation for general City staff time for administrative functions and systems that provide for a functional and operational assessment district within the City's administrative structure. Capital Expenditures Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Prepared by NBS -Fiscal Year 2011/12 Capital Projects: This item includes new improvements to further enhance the level and quality of service provided within the boundaries of the District. This may include new monuments, irrigation systems, and other large improvements. Operating Reserve Collection: Ooerating Reserve Collection: This item includes the amount to be collected to maintain reserves to enable the City to pay for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or whenever the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The Reserve Fund contribution will continue until such a time the Reserve Fund balance is approximately one half of the annual costs. The fund may be allowed to accumulate in anticipation of any unforeseen expenses not included in the yearly maintenance costs. This may include, but is not limited to, tree replacements, repair of damaged equipment due to vandalism, storms and other similar events. Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Prepared by NBS -Fiscal Year 2011/12 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT General Pursuant to the 1972 Act and Article XIII D, all parcels that have a special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements and services shall be identified, and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel shall be determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of improvements. The 1972 Act, permits the establishment of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include the operation, maintenance and servicing of landscaping improvements. Section 22573 of the 1972 Act requires that maintenance assessments must be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. This Section states: "The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district maybe apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements." The determination of whether or not a lot or parcel will benefit from the improvements shall be made pursuant to the Improvement Act of 1911 (Division 7 (commencing with Section 5000) (of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California]." The 1972 Act also permits the designation of zones of benefit within any individual assessment district if "by reasons or variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive different degrees of benefit from the improvement" (Sec. 22547). Article XIII D, Section 4(a) of the California Constitution limits the amount of any assessment to the proportional special benefit conferred on the property. Article XIII D also provides that publicly owned properties must be assessed unless there is clear and convincing evidence that those properties receive no special benefit from the assessment. Exempted from the assessment would be the areas of public streets, public avenues, public lanes, public roads, public drives, public courts, public alleys, public easements and rights-of-ways, public greenbelts and public parkways. The net amount to be assessed may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels. Proposition 218, approved by the voters in November 1996, requires the City to separate general benefit from special benefit, where only special benefit is assessed. Special Benefit The maintenance and servicing of the improvements within the District (which are described in the Description of Services and Improvements Section of this report) are for the benefit of the properties within the District, and as such confer a special and direct benefit to parcels within the District by: • improving the livability, appearance, and desirability for properties within the boundaries of the District, and • ensuring that improvements do not reach a state of deterioration or disrepair so as to be materially detrimental to properties within the District, and Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 10 Prepared by NBS -Fiscal Year 2011/12 • providing beautification, shade and overall enhancement to properties within the District. The above mentioned items affect the assessed property in a way that is particular and distinct from their effect on other parcels and that real property in general and the public at large do not share. They contribute to a specific enhancement of the properties within the District. Since these improvements, including the community trails, were installed and are maintained specifically for the properties within the District; only properties within the District receive a special benefit and are assessed for said maintenance. General Benefit In addition to the special benefits received by parcels within the District, there are derivative general benefits that are conferred on parcels outside the boundaries of the District which include: • the control of dust and insect infestations, and • the visual enhancement of the area to persons or vehicles that may travel through the District. However it has been determined that these benefits are derivative and do not provide a direct benefit to parcels outside of the district that are not being assessed. Method of Assessment Each of the parcels within the District is deemed to receive special benefit from the improvements. Each parcel that has a special benefit conferred upon it as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements are identified and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel is determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of the improvements. To assess special benefit appropriately, it is necessary to relate the different type of parcel improvements to each other. The Equivalent Benefit Unit ("EBU") method of apportionment uses the single family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single family home equals one Equivalent Benefit Unit (EBU). Every other land-use is converted to EBUs based on an assessment formula that equates to the property's specific development status, type of development (land-use), and size of the property, as compared to a single family home. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land-use types, as assigned by County use code, to determine each parcel's EBU assignment. Land-Use E uivalent Dwellin Units Pro ert T e Count Use Code EBU Value Multi tier Single Family Residential 1.00 Dwelling Unit The use of the latest County Assessor's Secured Roll shall be the basis for the Property Type determination and units/acreage assignments, unless better data is available to the City. In addition, if any parcel within the District is identified by the County Auditor/Controller to be an invalid parcel number for the current fiscal year, the Property Type and EBU assignment shall be based on the correct parcel number andlor new parcel number(s) County use code and subsequent property information. If a single parcel has changed to multiple parcels, the EBU assignment and assessment amount applied to each of the new parcels will be recalculated rather than spread the proportionate share of the original assessment. Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 11 Prepared by NBS -Fiscal Year 2011/12 The following table summarizes the Fiscal Year 2011/12 maximum allowable assessment rates for the District: Maximum Allowable Property Type (County Assessment Rate Actual Assessment Total Total Use Code) er EBU Rate per EBU Units/Acres EBUs Single Family Residential $151.45 $151.45 189.00 189.00 The total amount of maintenance and incidental costs for maintaining the landscaping and community trail improvements is assessed to the individual parcels of real property within the District in proportion to the special benefit received by such parcels of real property. The proposed individual assessments are shown on the assessment roll in this report. Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 12 Prepared by NBS -Fiscal Year 2011/12 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM An Assessment Diagram for the District is shown on the following page. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the County Assessor of the County San Bernardino, at the time this report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Engineer's Report. Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 13 Prepared by NBS -Fiscal Year 2011/12 ao v .~ .y O V ~/ ._ V a J ny ua~!II!W c 0 N ny !\ _ _ ny AJay~ 1 -p it ~ J ft1 /1 C N ~ N L 3 m o 0 DO li Q ~aaJ~ ned ny Ja3sayooa - -~ -{ ny uaneH ~ - - - - i _ ny esowJaH i - i ny ple4!4oJd ~- - ~ - - i ~ ny uewllaH i - - - - ~ - - - i 3S ue!lawe~ j - - ---~- - - - 1 .i'' ~ ~ C •_. ,i• ~~• t J ' N N ~ c m N ~ 'o c `~ m x 2~ Z~ .- U w .~ J O ~ U ~ 4 1 d ~r~ ~N 0 0 N N O nV ise3 in t v ..~_.._.._. ~ ny epuenn!33 ny Ja~sayoob _a -- ny ua~!II!W 9 ~~, j - ~ - ---- --_j jny uaneH i j - - - !nyesowJaH e i -- jny pleQ!4oJV i - ~-' ~ ny uewllaH ~~ /<'~ -~ r v ny p e~(au!n / ~ sa oE, a=fig-z e=` €~$°~' w L. .. __ _ _ _! e O ie;$$o~~yg=$ ° ' s ~.e a ~w4>~°a 3 P kaa °~ ~ : c cy 5 ~ ~B-. ~~a `a ~ s n~ ~~ tltl g a3 40 ~ g Fa F t Y 2F~E Y nAFE $8a F'°n~ [sa asb° ig'g ~ Ez3g~»g ffe€R ASSESSMENT ROLL Assessment Roll The assessment roll is a listing of the assessment for Fiscal Year 2011/12 apportioned to each lot or parcel, as shown on the last equalized roll of the Assessor of the County of San Bernardino. The following tables summarize the Fiscal Year 2011/12 maximum and actual assessments for the District: Maximum Allowable Maximum Property Type (County Assessment Rate Total Total Allowable Use Code er EBU UnitslAcres EBUs Assessment Single Family Residential $151.45 189.00 189.00 $28,624.05 Actual Property Type (County Assessment Rate Total Total Actual Use Code er EBU Units/Acres EBUs Assessment Single Family Residential $151.45 189.00 189.00 $28,624.05 A copy of the full assessment roll is available for review in the City Clerk's office. Annexations The following annexations are effective for the 2011/12 Fiscal Year: Assessor's Parcel Annexation Total Total Property Type Number Date Pro'ect Units/Acres EBUs Count Use Code 0228-011-31, 5/6/2009 DRC2003-00048 13.61 0.00 Vacant 0228-011-38 Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 14 Prepared by NBS -Fiscal Year 2011/12 Revised Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2011/2012 City of Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 (Lower Etiwanda) CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 9 (LOWER ETIWANDA) 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Phone: 909.477.2740 Fax: 909.477.2741 CITY COUNCIL L. Dennis Michael, Mayor Sam Spagnolo, Mayor Pro Tem William Alexander, Council Member Chuck Buquet, Council Member Diane Williams, Council Member CITY STAFF John R. Gillison, Assistant City Manager Linda D. Daniels, Deputy City Manager William Wittkopf, Public Works Director Ingrid Y. Bruce, GIS/Special Districts Manager Christopher Bopko, Management Analyst III TABLE OF CONTENTS ENGINEER'S LETTER INTRODUCTION 1 3 Reason for Assessment ...............................................................:.............................3 Process for Annual Assessment .................................................................................3 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS 5 Description of the Boundaries of the District ...............................................................5 Description of Improvements and Services ................................................................5 Map of Improvements .................................................................................................7 ESTIMATE OF COSTS 8 District Budget ............................................................................................................8 Definitions of Budget Items .........................................................................................9 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT 11 General ................................................................................... ........:.........................11 Special Benefit ....................................................................... ..................................11 General Benefit ...................................................................... ..................................12 Method of Assessment Spread .............................................. ..................................12 Maximum and Historical Assessments ................................... ..................................13 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM ASSESSMENT ROLL 14 15 Assessment Roll .......................................................................................................15 Annexations ..............................................................................................................15 ENGINEER'S LETTER WHEREAS, on , the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga (the "City"), under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 (the "1972 Act") adopted its Resolution No. _, a Resolution Initiating Proceedings for the Levy of Annual Assessments for Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 (Lower Etiwanda) (the "District"); and WHEREAS, the Resolution Initiating Proceedings directed NBS to prepare and file an Engineer's Report for Fiscal Year 2011/12 pursuant to the requirements of the 1972 Act. The Engineer's Report presents the plans and specifications describing the general nature, location and extent of the improvements to be maintained, an estimate of the costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements for the District for the referenced fiscal year, a diagram for the District, showing the area and properties proposed to be assessed, and an assessment of the estimated costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing the improvements, assessing the net amount upon all assessable lots and/or parcels within the District in proportion to the special benefit received; and NOW THEREFORE, the following assessment is proposed to be authorized in order to pay the estimated costs of maintenance, operation and servicing of the improvements to be paid by the assessable real property within the boundaries of the District in proportion to the special benefit received. The following table summarizes the proposed assessment. SUMMARY OF ASSESSMENT Fiscal Year 2011/12 Total Estimated Assessment $793,701.96 Less Anticipated Delinquency 18 361.96 Total Estimated Revenue $775,340.00 Less Reserve Fund Collection 322 110.00 Total Expenditure Budget $453,230.00 Total District EBU Count 2,045.94 Actual Assessment per EBU $387.94 Maximum Allowable Assessment per EBU $501.55 In making the assessments contained herein pursuant to the 1972 Act: I have identified all parcels which will have a special benefit conferred upon them from the improvements described in the Special Benefit Section of this Engineer's Report (the "Specially Benefited Parcels"). For particulars as to the identification of said parcels, reference is made to the Assessment Diagram, a copy of which is included in this Engineer's Report. 2. I have evaluated the costs and expenses of the improvements upon the Specially Benefited Parcels. In making such evaluation: a. The proportionate special benefit derived by each Specially Benefited Parcel from the improvements was determined in relationship to the entirety of the maintenance costs of the improvements; Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2011/12 b. No assessment has been imposed on any Specially Benefited Parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on such parcel from the improvements; and c. Any general benefits from the improvements have been separated from the special benefits and only special benefits have been assessed. I, the undersigned, respectfully submit the enclosed Engineer's Report and, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, the Engineer's Report, Assessments, and the Assessment Diagram herein have been prepared and computed in accordance with the order of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the 1972 Act, Article XIII D of the Constitution of the State of California ("Article XIII D") and the Proposition 218 Omnibus Implementation Act ("Proposition 218"), (the 1972 Act, Article XIII D and Proposition 218 are collectively referred to as the "Assessment Law"). Mark A. Steuer, City Engineer Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2011/12 INTRODUCTION Reason for Assessment Approval of the assessment covered by this Engineer's Report will generate the revenue necessary to: Provide for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements described in this Engineer's Report. Maintenance may include but is not limited to, all of the following: the repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement, providing for the life, growth, health and beauty of the landscaping, including cultivation, irrigation, trimming, spraying, fertilizing or treating for disease or injury, the removal of trimming, rubbish, debris and other solid waste, the maintenance, repair and replacement as necessary of all irrigation systems and the removal of graffiti from walls immediately adjacent to the cultivated areas. Servicing means the furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operating and servicing of any improvement. Servicing shall also include vehicle, equipment, capital improvements and administrative costs associated with the annual administration and operation of the District. Process for Annual Assessment The City cannot levy and collect annual assessments within the District without complying with the procedures specified in the 1972 Act. On an annual basis, an Engineer's Report must be prepared which contains a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the district. The City Council must also adopt a resolution of intention which: • Declares the intention of the City Council to levy and collect assessments within the assessment district for the fiscal year stated therein. • Generally describes the existing and proposed improvements and any substantial changes proposed to be made in existing improvements. • Refers to the assessment district by its distinctive designation and indicate the general location of the district. • Refers to the report of the engineer, on file with the clerk, for a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the district. • Gives notice of the time and place for public hearing by the City Council on the levy of the proposed assessment. • States whether the assessment is proposed to increase from the previous year. If the assessments are to be levied in the same or lesser amounts than the maximum assessment amount approved, the clerk shall give notice by causing the resolution of intention to be published. Any interested person may, prior to the conclusion of the hearing, file a written protest which shall state all grounds of objection. The protest shall contain a description sufficient to identify the property owned by the property owner filing the protest. During the course or upon conclusion of the public hearing, the City Council may order changes in any of the matters provided in the report, including changes in the improvements, any zones within the assessment district, and the proposed diagram or the proposed assessment. The City Council, upon conclusion of the public hearing must then adopt a resolution confirming the diagram and assessment, either as originally proposed or as changed by it. The adoption of the resolution shall constitute the levy of an assessment for the fiscal year referred to in the assessment. Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2011/12 If the assessment to be levied exceeds the maximum assessment amount previously approved, the City must comply with the procedures specified in Article XIII D and Proposition 218. The voters in the State of California in November 1996 added Article XIII D to the California Constitution imposing, among other requirements, the necessity for the City to conduct an assessment ballot procedure to enable the owners of each property on which assessments are proposed to be enacted or increased, the opportunity to express their support for, or opposition to the proposed assessment or increase in such assessment. The basic steps of the assessment ballot procedure are outlined below. The City must prepare a Notice of Public Hearing ("Notice"), which describes, along with other mandated information, the reason for the proposed assessments, and to provide a date and time of a public hearing to be held on the matter. The City must also prepare an assessment ballot, which clearly gives the property owner the ability to sign and mark their assessment ballot either in favor of, or in opposition to the proposed assessment. The Notice and assessment ballot are mailed to each affected property owner within the District a minimum of 45 days prior to the public hearing date as shown in the Notice. The City may also hold community meetings with the property owners to discuss the issues facing the District and to answer property owner questions directly. After the Notice and assessment ballot are mailed, property owners are given until the close of the public hearing, stated in the Notice, to return their signed and marked assessment ballot. During the public hearing, property owners are given the opportunity to address the City Council and ask questions or voice their concerns. At the public hearing, the returned assessment ballots received prior to the close of the public hearing are tabulated, weighted by the proposed assessment amount on each property and the results are announced by the City Council. Article XIII D provides that if, as a result of the assessment ballot proceeding, a majority protest is found to exist, the City Council shall not have the authority to levy and collect the assessments as proposed. A majority protest exists if the assessments represented by ballots submitted in opposition exceed those submitted in favor of the assessment. All returned ballots are tabulated and weighted according to the financial obligation of each particular parcel. If there is no majority protest as described above, the City Council may approve the proposed assessments. If there is a majority protest, as described above, the City will not levy and collect any assessments. Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 4 Fiscal Year 2011/12 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS The District provides for the administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing of various improvements located within the public right-of-way and dedicated easements within the boundaries of the District. of the Boundaries of the District The District is located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California. The boundaries of the District are generally described as that area known as Lower Etiwanda, which south of Victoria Street, north of Foothill Boulevard, generally east of Etiwanda Avenue and the I-15 freeway and west of East Avenue. Typically parcels have been annexed to the District as they have developed. Reference is also made to the Assessment Diagram included in this Report. Description of Improvements and Services The improvements are the maintenance and servicing of landscaping sites and appurtenant facilities throughout the District. The various landscaping sites that are maintained consist of parkways, median islands, street trees, paseos and community trails located within street right-of-ways and dedicated public easements which are within the boundaries of the District. The landscaping maintenance includes, but is not limited to, shrubs, turf, tree trimming in irrigated City parkways and paseos, weed and pest control, landscape irrigation systems and testing, trash, debris and graffiti removal, and associated appurtenant facilities. Services include personnel, materials, contracting services, utilities, and all necessary costs associated with the maintenance, replacement and repair required to keep the improvements in a healthy, vigorous and satisfactory condition. In addition, it is the City's intention to continue to use cost effective materials, including the future ability to replace landscaping with drought resistant or low water use plants, in order to lower expenses of the District. The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows: Parks: Garcia Park (formerly known as South Etiwanda Park) Site # Descriptive Location 9-1 The west side of East Ave. from 380 feet north of Chateau to 290 feet south of Chateau. Ground Cover area: 4,426 square feet Hardscape area: 7,360 square feet 9-2 The west side of East Ave. from 339 feet north of Brookfield to 157 feet north of Brookfield. Brookfield from East Ave. to Oak Crest. The east side of Oak Crest to 137 feet north of Brookfield. Grourid Cover area: 2,390 square feet Hardscape area: 6,874 square feet 9-3 The west side of East Ave. from 790 feet north of Highfield to 256 feet south of Highfield. Ground Cover area: 8,769 square feet Hardscape area: 10,669 square feet 9-4 The west side of East Ave. From 295 feet north of Via Veneto To Via Veneto. The north side of Via Verieto From East Ave to Dolcetto. The east side of Dolcetto from Via Veneto to Miller Ave. The south side of Miller Ave from 372 feet west of Dolcetto to 240 feet east Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2011/12 of Dolcetto. The west side of Dolcetto from Miller to Garcia. The north side of Garcia from Dolcetto to Etiwanda Ave. Ground Cover area: 48,612 square feet Hardscape area: 28,746 square feet 9-5 The north side of Miller from 429 feet west of Dolcetto to 1029 feet west of Dolcetto Ground Cover area: 6,519 square feet Hardscape area: 3,325 square feet 9-6 The north side of Miller From 254 feet east of Dolcetto to 167 feet west of Dolcetto. Ground Cover area: 4,089 square feet Hardscape area: 2,854 square feet 9-7 The south side of Lima, from 167 feet west of Brisas, to Green Glen. Ground Cover area: 2,580 square feet 9-8 The south side of Baseline from Etiwanda Av. to Shelby. The Baseline median from Etiwanda to 473 feet east of Shelby. Ground cover area: 16,395 square feet Hardscape area: 14,558 square feet 9-9 The north side of Candlewood St from Exbury St to Etiwanda Avenue. Ground Cover area: 3,362 square feet Hardscape area: 786 square feet 9-10 The north side of Baseline from 522 feet east of Forester to 180 feet west of Forester. The Baseline median from 503 feet east of Forester to 200 feet west of Forester. Ground cover area: 16,930 square feet Hardscape area: 13,600 square feet 9-11 The north side of Mueller Ct. from 40 feet past the east end of Mueller Ct. to 20 feet east of Dicarlo PI. Ground cover area: 9,420 square feet Hardscape area: 742 square feet 9-12 The north and south sides of Highland Av. from 217 feet west of Norcia Dr. to 210 feet east of Dicarlo PI. Ground cover area: 12,471 square feet Hardscape area: 14,445 square feet 9-13 The south side of Carnesi Dr. from Etiwanda Av. to 395 feet east of Murietta Ct. Ground cover area: 8,919 square feet Hardscape area: 6,203 square feet FH-17 The Foothill Blvd. median from Etiwanda Av. to Cornwell Av. Ground cover area: 8,275 square feet Ground cover, shrubs and turt areas that make up parkways, median islands and paseos are maintained under contract by a private landscape maintenance company. Parks are maintained by the City's Park Maintenance Crews Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2011/12 of Improvements The following page shows the map of landscaping improvements, including irrigation sites and community trails, to be maintained using District funds. Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2011/12 Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 N I mprovement Map ~ANCHU ~UCAMONGA 1210 FW 1 210 WEST RAMP U210 ONRP I-2d0iFW 1~15$OULF.~fiR;yMP J HIGHLAND AV HIGHLAND AV m Y W W U a 0 VICTORIA ST • ~Q FFtP o? ° ~~y ~ ~ B ASE LINE RD Q r- Q ~ ~ w O~ o ORS a ^h ~ O WATER METER z ~ J w ^~ IRRIGATION PUMP ~ a -•••-• PE TRAIL CHURCH ST ~ ° ~ IRRIGATION LINE U ~ MILLER AV - PARKS h```'~ Q LMD 9 Bounda \~,; ry MAJOR STREET y~ F ~ FREEWAY ~~~ PARCELS VI CTORIA GARDENS LN ~ ~ ~ ^~ FOOTHILL BL The maps, dale and geographic information ("Information") available by and through the City of Rancho Cucamonga are resented s a ubic resource of eneral information ~ p p g a FH18 The City of Rancho Cucamonga makes nor impies no wananry, regesentaaon or guarantee es to the content, sepuence, accuracy completeness or timeliness of any Information provided to you heren. The user should not rety Q'Q FH-17 I$ IN LMD 9, BUT upon the Informaton fa arty reason ono is directed to irxiepeMenty veery any end all IniormaUOn presentee herein. t0 h MAINTAINED BY MARIPOSA The City of Renctro Cucamonga expfialy aM withaR NmiMion \`r~ disdaims erry end all repesentagorts and warrantees. indudng. but not united to, the lrnpled warranties of merchantedlily and fitness for a particular purpose. The Ciry of Rancho Cucamonga 0.250.125 0 0.25 Miles shat nedher accept nor assume any fadldy, regardless of the causation for (I) any errors, omissions or inaccurades in any infomnation provided end/or (ii) any acfion or inaction occurring due to any persons reience upon the Information available herein ESTIMATE OF COSTS The estimated costs of administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing the improvements as described in the Plans and Specifications are summarized below. Each year, as part of the assessment district levy calculation process, the costs and expenses are reviewed and the annual costs are projected for the following fiscal year. District Budget Estimated 2011/12 Bud et Personnel Services Re ular Salaries $144,680.00 Part-lime Salaries 7,860.00 Frin a Benefits 68 860.00 Subtotal Personnel $221,400.00 O erations and Maintenance O erations and Maintenance $14,350.00 Emer enc E ui ment and Vehicle Rental 200.00 Contract Services 66,890.00 Tree Maintenance 6,600.00 Utilities Water Utilities 24,700.00 Electric Utilities 5,530.00 Assessment Administration 8,750.00 General Overhead 54 810.00 Subtotal O erations and Maintenance $181,830.00 Ca ital Ex enditures Ca ital Pro'ects 50 000.00 Subtotal Ca ital Ex enditures $50,000.00 Total District Ex enditure Bud et $453,230.00 Total Estimated Assessment $793,701.96 Less Anticipated Delinquency 18 361.96 Total Estimated Revenue $775,340.00 Less Operating Reserve Fund Collection 322 110.00 Total Expenditure Budget $453,230.00 Total Estimated Assessment $793,701.96 Total District EBU Count 2,045.94 Actual Assessment er EBU -Fiscal Year 2011/12 $387.94 Maximum Allowable Assessment er EBU -Fiscal Year 2011/12 $501.55 Each year, prior to the assessments being placed on the tax roll, the City will review the budget and determine the amount needed to maintain the improvements for the upcoming fiscal year. The actual assessment per EBU will be based on the estimated costs of maintenance, available fund balance and maximum allowable assessment with the goal of maintaining the improvements in a satisfactory Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2011112 and healthy condition. The actual assessment amount may be lower than the maximum allowable assessment; however it may not exceed the maximum unless the increase is approved by the property owners in accordance with Proposition 218. It is the intent of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to maintain an Operating Reserve which shall not exceed the estimated costs of maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or when the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The reserve balance information for the District is as follows: Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2011 Reserve Fund Balance $2,397,115.56 Operating Reserve Contribution -Fiscal Year 2011/12 0.00 Ooeratina Reserve Collection -Fiscal Year 2011/12 322.110.00 Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2012 Reserve Fund Balance $2,719,225.56 Definitions of Budget Items The following definitions describe the costs and expenses included in the District Budget Personnel Services Reoular Salaries: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all full-time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Part Time Salaries: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all part time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Fringe Benefits: This item includes the benefits available to City employees: health care, vacation, sick time, and retirement fund. Operations and Maintenance Contract Services: This item includes the contract costs of a landscape maintenance company responsible for the ongoing maintenance of the District improvements. Tree Maintenance: This item includes the contract costs attributed to maintaining the street trees and other trees throughout the District. Utilities -Water: This item includes the costs to furnish water for the landscaping within the District. Utilities -Electric: This item includes the costs to furnish electricity required for the operation and maintenance of the sprinklers and irrigation controllers. Assessment Administration: This item includes the cost to all particular departments and staff of the City, and consultants for providing the administration, coordination and management of District services, operations, and incidental expenses related to the District. This item also includes creation of an annual engineer's report, resolutions and placing the assessment amounts onto the County tax roll each year, along with responding to any public inquiries and future Proposition 218 balloting proceedings. General Overhead: This item includes the costs of all departments and staff of the City for providing the coordination of District services, inspections, annual bid management, responding to public concerns, public education, accounting, auditing and procedural matters associated with the District. This item also includes an allocation for general City staff time for administrative functions and Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2011 /12 systems that provide for a functional and operational assessment district within the City's administrative structure. Capital Expenditures: Capital Projects: This item includes new improvements to further enhance the level and quality of service provided within the boundaries of the District. This may include new monuments, irrigation systems, and other large improvements. Operating Reserve Collection: Operating Reserve Collection: This item includes the amount to be collected to maintain reserves to enable the City to pay for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or whenever the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The Reserve Fund contribution will continue until such a time the Reserve Fund balance is approximately one half of the annual costs. The fund may be allowed to accumulate in anticipation of any unforeseen expenses not included in the yearly maintenance costs. This may include, but is not limited to, tree replacements, repair of damaged equipment due to vandalism, storms and other similar events. Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 10 Fiscal Year 2011/12 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT General Pursuant to the 1972 Act and Article XIII D, all parcels that have a special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements and services shall be identified, and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel shall be determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of improvements. The 1972 Act, permits the establishment of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include the operation, maintenance and servicing of landscaping improvements. Section 22573 of the 1972 Act requires that maintenance assessments must be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. This Section states: "The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district maybe apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements." The determination of whether or not a lot or parcel will benefit from the improvements shall be made pursuant to the Improvement Act of 1911 (Division 7 (commencing with Section 5000) (of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California)." The 1972 Act also permits the designation of zones of benefit within any individual assessment district if "by reasons or variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive different degrees of benefit from the improvement" (Sec. 22547). Article XIII D, Section 4(a) of the California Constitution limits the amount of any assessment to the proportional special benefit conferred on the property. Article XIII D also provides that publicly owned properties must be assessed unless there is clear and convincing evidence that those properties receive no special benefit from the assessment. Exempted from the assessment would be the areas of public streets, public avenues, public lanes, public roads, public drives, public courts, public alleys, public easements and rights-of-ways, public greenbelts and public parkways. The net amount to be assessed may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels. Proposition 218, approved by the voters in November 1996, requires the City to separate general benefit from special benefit, where only special benefit is assessed. Special Benefit The maintenance and servicing of the improvements within the District (which are described in the Description of Improvements and Services Section of this report) are for the benefit of the properties within the District, and as such confer a special and direct benefit to parcels within the District by: • improving the livability, appearance, and desirability for properties within the boundaries of the District, and • ensuring that improvements do not reach a state of deterioration or disrepair so as to be materially detrimental to properties within the District, and Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 11 Fiscal Year 2011/12 • providing beautification, shade and overall enhancement to properties within the District. The above mentioned items affect the assessed property in a way that is particular and distinct from their effect on other parcels and that real property in general and the public at large do not share. They contribute to a specific enhancement of the properties within the District. Since these improvements, including the community trails, were installed and are maintained specifically for the properties within the District; only properties within the District receive a special benefit and are assessed for said maintenance. General Benefit In addition to the special benefits received by parcels within the District, there are derivative general benefits that are conferred on parcels outside the boundaries of the District which include: • the control of dust and insect infestations, and • the visual enhancement of the area to persons or vehicles that may travel through the District. However it has been determined that these benefits are derivative and do not provide a direct benefit to parcels outside of the district that are not being assessed. Method of Assessment Each of the parcels within the District is deemed to receive special benefit from the improvements. Each parcel that has a special benefit conferred upon it as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements are identified and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel is determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of the improvements. To assess special benefit appropriately, it is necessary to relate the different type of parcel improvements to each other. The Equivalent Benefit Unit ("EBU") method of apportionment uses the single family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single family home equals one Equivalent Benefit Unit (EBU). Every other land-use is converted to EBUs based on an assessment formula that equates to the property's specific development status, type of development (land-use), and size of the property, as compared to a single family home. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land-use types, as assigned by County use code, to determine each parcel's EBU assignment. Land-Use E uivalent Dwellin Units Pro ert T e Count Use Code EBU Value Multi tier Single Family Residential 1.00 Dwelling Unit Multi-Family Residential 1.00 Dwelling Unit Non-Residential Improved 2.00 Acre Vacant Property 0.25 Acre The use of the latest County Assessor's Secured Roll shall be the basis for the Property Type determination and units/acreage assignments, unless better data is available to the City. In addition, if any parcel within the District is identified by the County AuditorlController to be an invalid parcel number for the current fiscal year, the Property Type and EBU assignment shall be based on the Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 12 Fiscal Year 2011/12 correct parcel number and/or new parcel number(s) County use code and subsequent property information. If a single parcel has changed to multiple parcels, the EBU assignment and assessment amount applied to each of the new parcels will be recalculated rather than spread the proportionate share of the original assessment. The following table summarizes the Fiscal Year 2011/12 maximum allowable assessment rates for the District: Property Type (County Use Code) Maximum Allowable Assessment Rate er EBU Actual Assessment Rate er EBU Total Units/Acres Total EBUs Single Family Residential $496.55 $387.94 1,573.00 1,573.00 Multi-Family Residential 496.55 387.94 420.00 420.00 Non-Residentiallmproved 496.55 387.94 26.47 52.94 Vacant Property 496.55 387.94 0.00 0.00 The total amount of maintenance and incidental costs for maintaining the landscaping and community trail improvements is assessed to the individual parcels of real property within the District in proportion to the special benefit received by such parcels of real property. The proposed individual assessments are shown on the assessment roll in this report. Maximum and Historical Assessments The maximum allowable assessment per EBU listed in the District budget above, is the amount which was approved in 2000/01, when the District was formed, and subsequent District annexations. Commencing in Fiscal Year 2001/02, the amount of the maximum allowable assessment is proposed to increase each year based upon the Consumer Price Index ("CPI"), All Urban Consumers, for the Los Angeles-Anaheim-San Bernardino Area, as determined by the United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics or its successor. Each year the percentage difference between the CPI for March of each year and the CPI for the previous March shall be computed. The assessment shall be adjusted by an amount not to exceed such percentage for the following fiscal year. Should the Bureau of Labor Statistics revise such index or discontinue preparation of such index, the revised index or a comparable system as approved by the City Council shall be used for determining fluctuations in the cost of living. Historical maximum assessment amounts and actual assessment amounts are shown in the table below: Fiscal Year Maximum Assessment er EBU Actual Assessment er EBU 2000/01 $375.91 $375.91 2001/02 388.02 375.91 2002/03 398.81 375.91 2003/04 414.44 375.91 2004/05 421.71 375.91 2005/06 438.67 375.91 2006/07 459.15 375.91 2007/08 476.76 387.94 2008/09 492.41 387.94 2009/10 487.50 387.94 2011/12 496.55 387.94 Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 13 Fiscal Year 2011112 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM An Assessment Diagram for the District is shown on the following page. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the County Assessor of the County San Bernardino, at the time this report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Engineer's Report. Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 14 Fiscal Year 2011/12 o~ y.. v 'i ,y G A~ W r~ •~ J ny ua~!II!W c N ny epue ~aa~~ ny ~alsayooa ny uaneH ~ - - - i ny esow~aH ~ - i nb, Pleyl4o~H ~-_ i i ny lway~ a N C _ J Cfl ~ N N L 3 ~ O m ~ ~ LL Q .~ J O ~ U ~ d ~r~ y ~ J ~N O 0 N O lse3 in L v .._.._. _ ny epueM!13 ~ - f i °• - ~. i j ny ~a~sayooa ~ i _ _-- i -- ~ - i ny ua~!II!W -- - ~ a i j I} j --- - - ~ - I - -- . _ - - -I jny uaneH - - ~ - - - !nyesow~aH e -- - - - 1nV Pley!yo~d ny uewlfaH i - -- - +- -- - - ~.•~"~ ny uewllaH j ~r'• L L v ~ ! ! ntl P eRau!n i 3S ue!lawe~ j -- - -- t- - - - i~ VE z _ U ` ass Q `te 0_' C CD LL e°~s'~+~~~~$ e$~E W f6 m ~S@9 sg •, •,~oe S?an s~° 2 ~ 2 ~ tl C'e% gye~_~. P g g4ux`_" _d E as 1=~z = C A~2 494: °Ue f E=>T g a € wee ~g€, €z~aa.~~o.°se ASSESSMENT ROLL Assessment Roll The assessment roll is a listing of the assessment for Fiscal Year 2011/12 apportioned to each lot or parcel, as shown on the last equalized roll of the Assessor of the County of San Bernardino. The following tables summarize the Fiscal Year 2011/12 maximum and actual assessments for the District: Property Type (County Use Code Maximum Allowable Assessment Rate er EBU Total Units/Acres Total EBUs Maximum Allowable Assessment Single Family Residential $501.55 1,573.00 1,573.00 $788,938.15 Multi-Family Residential 501.55 420.00 420.00 210,651.00 Non-Residentiallmproved 501.55 26.47 52.94 26,552.05 Vacant Property 501.55 0.00 0.00 0.00 TOTALS 2,019.47 2,045.94 $1,026,141.20 Property Type (County Use Code Actual Assessment Rate er EBU Total Units/Acres Total EBUs Actual Assessment Single Family Residential $387.94 1,573.00 1,573.00 $610,229.62 Multi-Family Residential 387.94 420.00 420.00 162,934.80 Non-Residentiallmproved 387.94 26.47 52.94 20,537.54 Vacant Property 387.94 0.00 0.00 0.00 TOTALS 2,019.47 2,045.94 $793,701.96 A copy of the full assessment roll is available for review in the City Clerk's office. Annexations There were no annexations effective for the 2011 /12 Fiscal Year: Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 15 Fiscal Year 2011/12 Revised Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2011/2012 City of Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 10 (Rancho Etiwanda) CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 10 (RANCHO ETIWANDA) 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Phone: 909.477.2740 Fax: 909.477.2741 CITY COUNCIL L. Dennis Michael, Mayor Sam Spagnolo, Mayor Pro Tem William Alexander, Council Member Chuck Buquet, Council Member Diane Williams, Council Member CITY STAFF John R. Gillison, Assistant City Manager Linda D. Daniels, Deputy City Manager William Wittkopf, Public Works Director Ingrid Y. Bruce, GIS/Special Districts Manager Christopher Bopko, Management Analyst III TABLE OF CONTENTS ENGINEER'S LETTER INTRODUCTION 1 3 Reason for Assessment .............................................................................................3 Process for Annual Assessment .................................................................................3 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS 5 Description of the Boundaries of the District ...............................................................5 Description of Improvements and Services ................................................................5 Map of Improvements .................................................................................................7 ESTIMATE OF COSTS 8 District Budget ............................................................................................................8 Definitions of Budget Items .........................................................................................9 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT 11 General .....................................................................................................................11 Special Benefit .........................................................................................................11 General Benefit ........................................................................................................12 Method of Assessment Spread ................................................................................12 Maximum and Historical Assessments .....................................................................13 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM ASSESSMENT ROLL 14 15 Assessment Roll .......................................................................................................15 Annexations ..............................................................................................................15 ENGINEER'S LETTER WHEREAS, on ,the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 (the "1972 Act") adopted its Resolution No. _, a Resolution Initiating Proceedings for the Levy of Annual Assessments for Landscape Maintenance District No. 10 (Rancho Etiwanda) (the "District"); and WHEREAS, the Resolution Initiating Proceedings directed NBS to prepare and file an Engineer's Report for Fiscal Year 2011/12 pursuant to the requirements of the 1972 Act. The Engineer's Report presents the plans and specifications describing the general nature, location and extent of the improvements to be maintained, an estimate of the costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements for the District for the referenced fiscal year, a diagram for the District, showing the area and properties proposed to be assessed, and an assessment of the estimated costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing the improvements, assessing the net amount upon all assessable lots and/or parcels within the District in proportion to the special benefit received; and NOW THEREFORE, the following assessment is proposed to be authorized in order to pay the estimated costs of maintenance, operation and servicing of the improvements to be paid by the assessable real property within the boundaries of the District in proportion to the special benefit received. The following table summarizes the proposed assessment. SUMMARY OF ASSESSMENT Fiscal Year 2011/12 Total Estimated Assessment $462,766.20 Less Anticipated Delinquencies 27 126.20 Total Estimated Revenue $435,640.00 Plus Reserve Fund Contribution 182 460.00 Total Expenditure Budget $618,100.00 Total District EBU Count 751.00 Actual Assessment per EBU $616.20 Maximum Allowable Assessment per EBU $771.79 In making the assessments contained herein pursuant to the 1972 Act: I have identified all parcels which will have a special benefit conferred upon them from the improvements described in the Special Benefit Section of this Engineer's Report (the "Specially Benefited Parcels"). For particulars as to the identification of said parcels, reference is made to the Assessment Diagram, a copy of which is included in this Engineer's Report. I have evaluated the costs and expenses of the improvements upon the Specially Benefited Parcels. In making such evaluation: a. The proportionate special benefit derived by each Specially Benefited Parcel from the improvements was determined in relationship to the entirety of the maintenance costs of the improvements; Landscape Maintenance District No. 10 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2011/12 b. No assessment has been imposed on any Specially Benefited Parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on such parcel from the improvements; and c. Any general benefits from the improvements have been separated from the special benefits and only special benefits have been assessed. I, the undersigned, respectfully submit the enclosed Engineer's Report and, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, the Engineer's Report, Assessments, and the Assessment Diagram herein have been prepared and computed in accordance with the order of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the 1972 Act, Article XIII D of the Constitution of the State of California ("Article XIII D") and the Proposition 218 Omnibus Implementation Act ("Proposition 218"), (the 1972 Act, Article XIII D and Proposition 218 are collectively referred to as the "Assessment Law"). Mark A. Steuer, City En er Landscape Maintenance District No. 10 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2011/12 INTRODUCTION Reason for Assessment Approval of the assessment covered by this Engineer's Report will generate the revenue necessary to: Provide for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements described in this Engineer's Report. Maintenance may include but is not limited to, all of the following: the repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement, providing for the life, growth, health and beauty of the landscaping, including cultivation, irrigation, trimming, spraying, fertilizing or treating for disease or injury, the removal of trimming, rubbish, debris and other solid waste, the maintenance, repair and replacement as necessary of all irrigation systems and the removal of graffiti from walls immediately adjacent to the cultivated areas. Servicing means the furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operating and servicing of any improvement. Servicing shall also include vehicle, equipment, capital improvements and administrative costs associated with the annual administration and operation of the District. Process for Annual Assessment The City cannot levy and collect annual assessments within the District without complying with the procedures specified in the 1972 Act. On an annual basis, an Engineer's Report must be prepared which contains a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the district. The City Council must also adopt a resolution of intention which: • Declares the intention of the City Council to levy and collect assessments within the assessment district for the fiscal year stated therein. • Generally describes the existing and proposed improvements and any substantial changes proposed to be made in existing improvements. • Refers to the assessment district by its distinctive designation and indicate the general location of the district. • Refers to the report of the engineer, on file with the clerk, for a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the district. • Gives notice of the time and place for public hearing by the City Council on the levy of the proposed assessment. • States whether the assessment is proposed to increase from the previous year. If the assessments are to be levied in the same or lesser amounts than the maximum assessment amount approved, the clerk shall give notice by causing the resolution of intention to be published. Any interested person may, prior to the conclusion of the hearing, file a written protest which shall state all grounds of objection. The protest shall contain a description sufficient to identify the property owned by the property owner filing the protest. During the course or upon conclusion of the public hearing, the City Council may order changes in any of the matters provided in the report, including changes in the improvements, any zones within the assessment district, and the proposed diagram or the proposed assessment. Landscape Maintenance District No. 10 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2011/12 The City Council, upon conclusion of the public hearing must then adopt a resolution confirming the diagram and assessment, either as originally proposed or as changed by it. The adoption of the resolution shall constitute the levy of an assessment for the fiscal year referred to in the assessment If the assessment to be levied exceeds the maximum assessment amount previously approved, the City must comply with the procedures specified in Article XIII D and Proposition 218. The voters in the State of California in November 1996 added Article XIII D to the California Constitution imposing, among other requirements, the necessity for the City to conduct an assessment ballot procedure to enable the owners of each property on which assessments are proposed to be enacted or increased, the opportunity to express their support for, or opposition to the proposed assessment or increase in such assessment. The basic steps of the assessment ballot procedure are outlined below. The City must prepare a Notice of Public Hearing ("Notice"), which describes, along with other mandated information, the reason for the proposed assessments, and to provide a date and time of a public hearing to be held on the matter. The City must also prepare an assessment ballot, which clearly gives the property owner the ability to sign and mark their assessment ballot either in favor of, or in opposition to the proposed assessment. The Notice and assessment ballot are mailed to each affected property owner within the assessment district a minimum of 45 days prior to the public hearing date as shown in the Notice. The City may also hold community meetings with the property owners to discuss the issues facing the district and to answer property owner questions directly. After the Notice and assessment ballot are mailed, property owners are given until the close of the public hearing, stated in the Notice, to return their signed and marked assessment ballot. During the public hearing, property owners are given the opportunity to address the City Council and ask questions or voice their concerns. At the public hearing, the returned assessment ballots received prior to the close of the public hearing are tabulated, weighted by the proposed assessment amount on each property and the results are announced by the City Council. Article XIII D provides that if, as a result of the assessment ballot proceeding, a majority protest is found to exist, the City Council shall not have the authority to levy and collect the assessments as proposed. A majority protest exists if the assessments represented by ballots submitted in opposition exceed those submitted in favor of the assessment. All returned ballots are tabulated and weighted according to the financial obligation of each particular parcel. If there is no majority protest as described above, the City Council may approve the proposed assessments. If there is a majority protest, as described above, the City will not levy and collect any assessments. Landscape Maintenance District No. 10 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2011/12 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS The District provides for the administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing of various improvements located within the public right-of-way and dedicated easements within the boundaries of the District. of the Boundaries of the District The District is located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California. The boundaries of the District are generally described as that area known as Rancho Etiwanda, which lies north of Highway 210, east of Day Creek Channel, and west of Hanley Avenue. Typically parcels have been annexed to the District as they have developed. Reference is also made to the Assessment Diagram included in this Report. Description of Improvements and Services The improvements are the maintenance and servicing of landscaping sites and appurtenant facilities throughout the District. The various landscaping sites that are maintained consist of parkways, median islands, street trees, paseos and community trails located within street right-of-ways and dedicated public easements which are within the boundaries of the District. The landscaping maintenance includes, but is not limited to, shrubs, turf, tree trimming in irrigated City parkways and paseos, weed and pest control, landscape irrigation systems and testing, trash, debris and graffiti removal, and associated appurtenant facilities. Services include personnel, materials, contracting services, utilities, and all necessary costs associated with the maintenance, replacement and repair required to keep the improvements in a healthy, vigorous and satisfactory condition. In addition, it is the City's intention to continue to use cost effective materials, including the future ability to replace landscaping with drought resistant or low water use plants, in order to lower expenses of the District. The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows: Parks: Day Creek Park. Site # Descriptive Location 10-1 The west side of Day Creek from 790 feet north of Richfield to Wilson. The north side of Wilson from Day Creek to 227 feet west of Day Creek. This site overlaps 10-2. Ground Cover area: 16,941 square feet Hardscape area: 3,589 square feet 10-2 The north and south side of Wilson from 497 feet west of Alvarado to Day Creek with 1 station at top of highest retaining wall on corner of Wilson and Day Creek. This station overlaps site 10-1. The south side of Wilson from Day Creek to Bluegrass. The Wilson median from Day Creek to Bluegrass. Ground Cover area: 47,275 square feet Hardscape area: 6,444 square feet 10-3 The west side of Day Creek from Wilson to 144 feet south of Clydesdale. The Day Creek median from Wilson to Banyan. Ground Cover area: 32,619 square feet Hardscape area: 10,983 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 10 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2011 /12 10-4 The east side of Day Creek from 648 feet south of Keenland to Wilson. Ground Cover area: 15,952 square feet Hardscaoe area: 4,365 square feet 10-5 The west side of Bluegrass from Wilson to 705 feet south of Challendon. Ground Cover area: 26,882 square feet Hardscaoe area: 12,220 square feet 10-6 The south side of Banyan from Rochester to Day Creek. The north side of Banyan from 427 feet west of Rocking Horse to Rocking Horse. The west side of Day Creek from Banyan to Vintage. The Day Creek median from Banyan to Vintage. The north side of Vintage from Day Creek to paseo ending 153 feet west of Sand Hill. Ground Cover area: 44,000 square feet Hardscaoe area: 16,197 square feet 10-7 The north side of Vintage from 180 feet east of Taylor Canyon Place to Day Creek. The east side of Day Creek from Vintage to Banyan. The south side of Banyan from Day Creek to Bluegrass. Ground Cover area: 22,164 square feet Hardscaoe area: 11,724 square feet 10-8 The landscape against the south side facing wall north of the 210 freeway from the top of the slope on the east side of Day Creek to 300 feet eastward. The Day Creek median from the 210 freeway to Vintage. The east side of Day Creek from Caltrans ROW to Vintage. The south side of Vintage from Day Creek to 180 feet east of Taylor Canyon. Ground Cover area: 16,841 square feet Hardscaoe area: 7,025 square feet 10-9 The north side of Coyote from Brookstone Place to Day Creek. The east side of Day Creek from Coyote to 358 feet north of Coyote. The west side of Day Creek from 118 feet north of Coyote to 380 feet north of Coyote. Ground cover area: 9,403 square feet Hardscage area: 6,052 square feet "This site previously had 8,488 square feet of ground cover and 5,752 of Hardscage prior to the addition of the area on the west side of Day Creek 10-10 The north side of Wilson from 395 feet east of Day Creek to Day Creek. The eastside of Day Creek from Wilson to Blackstone. The south side of Blackstone from Day Creek to Stoneview. The north side of Blackstone from Day Creek to 165 feet west of Stoneview. Ground cover area: 26,304 square feet Hardscage area: 19,117 square feet 10-11 The west side of Day Creek from 340 feet north of Banyan to Banyan. The north side of Banyan from Day Creek to Rocking Horse. Ground cover area: 20,378 square feet Hardscage area: 11,212 square feet 10-12 The paseo on the east side of Stoneview Rd. across from Duncaster PI. Ground cover area: 3,326 square feet Hardscage area: 2,374 square feet Ground cover, shrubs and turf areas that make up parkways, median islands and paseos are maintained under contract by a private landscape maintenance company. Parks are maintained by the City's Park Maintenance Crews. Landscape Maintenance District No. 10 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 6 Fiscal Year 2011/12 Map of Improvements The following page shows the map of landscaping improvements, including irrigation sites and community trails, to be maintained using District funds. Landscape Maintenance District No. 10 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2011/12 N A i I' -- ~ t ~t~ ~~,. -' iJ I~LLII ~ ~~i~~Yv PLO ~`~ e ~, a ~ `{ T r~r ~-~.-t , _ ~ l-_, . i. ~~.~1 y- ~_ ~~ ~tT --- I_I1ii_?1it ~;11~I~ ~__~ ~-. j ~_.: T. The maps, data and geographic informafion available 6y and through the Ciry of Ranchc are presented as a puhlic resource o! gene) Landscape Maintenance District No. 7D Im rovement Ma ~',-~~`,-1; __~ '•C~ ti ,,1 ~ I including, riliry and Q WATER METER ^O IRRIGATION PUMP -•••-• PE TRAIL IRRIGATION LINE - PARKS LMD 10 BOUNDARY MAJOR STREET FREEWAY PARCELS 1J I J 1~~~ ? j c ~ ~ : ~~- ~ F r z - c I . ~~ ~~ =~ ~ , r _ 1-- ~ ~ G , tt r ~ :.~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~ -~~~ 1. ~ J~~_~? ' 1 ,' ~~ 1 I ~ 11~ i _~1_ i L _ J 7• ro cr=u ~ I ~- -- ~ I t '- ~~ ' I J -- _ r ~ = i i~~~~~ ll T--~ ~. _ ~ -~I. ~ 1F-~ I _~ ~ ~~ ' i ~~~~~ ~, ,~ ;~1_: I''~ T' << _i_ Jyi ~` TAI ! ~ i_~_; ~;~ ~~ ~ -{1~_ ~ !~~,~I ~i l~L- nl;rr ~~~~~I w W V Q I-_ I i' ESTIMATE OF COSTS The estimated costs of administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing the improvements as described in the Plans and Specifications are summarized below. Each year, as part of the assessment district levy calculation process, the costs and expenses are reviewed and the annual costs are projected for the following fiscal year. District Estimated 2011/12 Budget Personnel Services Regular Salaries $159,070.00 Overtime Salaries 1,050.00 Part-time Salaries 27,590.00 Fringe Benefits 77.790.00 Subtotal Personnel $265,500.00 Operations and Maintenance Operations and Maintenance $26,500.00 Operations and Maintenance/Facilities 4,000.00 Emergency Equipment and Vehicle Rental 1,000.00 Equipment Operations and Maintenance 1,000.00 Contract Services 123,300.00 Contract Services/Facilities 2,000.00 Tree Maintenance 6,860.00 Utilities Water Utilities 72,000.00 Electric Utilities 50,400.00 Assessment Administration 4,130.00 General Overhead 31.410.00 Subtotal Operations and Maintenance $322,600.00 Capital Expenditures Capital Projects $30.000.00 Subtotal Capital Expenditures ~ $30,000.00 Total District Expenditure Budget ~ $618,100.00 Total Estimated Assessment ~ $462,766.20 Less Anticipated Delinquencies (27.126.20) Total Estimated Revenue $435,640.00 Plus Operating Reserve Fund Contribution 182.460.00 Total Expenditure Budget $618,100.00 Total Estimated Assessment $462,766.20 Total District EBU Count 751.00 Actual Assessment per EBU -Fiscal Year 2011/12 $616.20 Maximum Allowable Assessment per EBU -Fiscal Year 2011/12 $771.79 Landscape Maintenance District No. 10 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 8 Fiscal Year 2011/12 Each year, prior to the assessments being placed on the tax roll, the City will review the budget and determine the amount needed to maintain the improvements for the upcoming fiscal year. The actual assessment per EBU will be based on the estimated costs of maintenance, available fund balance and maximum allowable assessment with the goal of maintaining the improvements in a satisfactory and healthy condition. The actual assessment amount may be lower than the maximum allowable assessment; however it may not exceed the maximum unless the increase is approved by the property owners in accordance with Proposition 218. It is the intent of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to maintain an Operating Reserve which shall not exceed the estimated costs of maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or when the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The reserve balance information for the District is as follows: Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2011 Reserve Fund Balance $1,081,297.80 Operating Reserve Contribution -Fiscal Year 2011/12 (182,460.00) Operating Reserve Collection -Fiscal Year 2011/12 0.00 Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2012 Reserve Fund Balance $898,837.80 Definitions of Budget Items The following definitions describe the costs and expenses included in the District Budget Personnel Services Reoular Salaries: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all full-time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Part Time Salaries: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all part time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Fringe Benefits: This item includes the benefits available to City employees: health care, vacation, sick time, and retirement fund. Operations and Maintenance Contract Services: This item includes the contract costs of a landscape maintenance company responsible for the ongoing maintenance of the District improvements. Tree Maintenance: This item includes the contract costs attributed to maintaining the street trees and other trees throughout the District. Utilities -Water: This item includes the costs to furnish water for the landscaping within the District. Utilities -Electric: This item includes the costs to furnish electricity required for the operation and maintenance of the sprinklers and irrigation controllers. Assessment Administration: This item includes the cost to all particular departments and staff of the City, and consultants for providing the administration, coordination and management of District services, operations, and incidental expenses related to the District. This item also includes creation of an annual engineer's report, resolutions and placing the assessment amounts onto the County tax roll each year, along with responding to any public inquiries and future Proposition 218 balloting proceedings. Landscape Maintenance District No. 10 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2011 /12 General Overhead: This item includes the costs of all departments and staff of the City for providing the coordination of District services, inspections, annual bid management, responding to public concerns, public education, accounting, auditing and procedural matters associated with the District. This item also includes an allocation for general City staff time for administrative functions and systems that provide for a functional and operational assessment district within the City's administrative structure. Capital Expenditures: Capital Projects: This item includes new improvements to further enhance the level and quality of service provided within the boundaries of the District. This may include new monuments, irrigation systems, and other large improvements. Operating Reserve Collection: Operating Reserve Collection: This item includes the amount to be collected to maintain reserves to enable the City to pay for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or whenever the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The Reserve Fund contribution will continue until such a time the Reserve Fund balance is approximately one half of the annual costs. The fund may be allowed to accumulate in anticipation of any unforeseen expenses not included in the yearly maintenance costs. This may include, but is not limited to, tree replacements, repair of damaged equipment due to vandalism, storms and other similar events. Landscape Maintenance District No. 10 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 10 Fiscal Year 2011/12 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT General Pursuant to the 1972 Act and Article XIII D, all parcels that have a special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements and services shall be identified, and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel shall be determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of improvements. The 1972 Act, permits the establishment of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include the operation, maintenance and servicing of landscaping improvements. Section 22573 of the 1972 Act requires that maintenance assessments must be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. This Section states: "The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district maybe apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements." The determination of whether or not a lot or parcel will benefit from the improvements shall be made pursuant to the Improvement Act of 1911 (Division 7 (commencing with Section 5000) (of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California]." The 1972 Act also permits the designation of zones of benefit within any individual assessment district if "by reasons or variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive different degrees of benefit from the improvement" (Sec. 22547). Article XIII D, Section 4(a) of the California Constitution limits the amount of any assessment to the proportional special benefit conferred on the property. Article XIII D also provides that publicly owned properties must be assessed unless there is clear and convincing evidence that those properties receive no special benefit from the assessment. Exempted from the assessment would be the areas of public streets, public avenues, public lanes, public roads, public drives, public courts, public alleys, public easements and rights-of-ways, public greenbelts and public parkways. The net amount to be assessed may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels. Proposition 218, approved by the voters in November 1996, requires the City to separate general benefit from special benefit, where only special benefit is assessed. Benefit The maintenance and servicing of the improvements within the District (which are described in the Description of Improvements and Services Section of this report) are for the benefit of the properties within the District, and as such confer a special and direct benefit to parcels within the District by: • improving the livability, appearance, and desirability for properties within the boundaries of the District, and • ensuring that improvements do not reach a state of deterioration or disrepair so as to be materially detrimental to properties within the District, and Landscape Maintenance District No. 10 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 11 Fiscal Year 2011/12 • providing beautification, shade and overall enhancement to properties within the District. The above mentioned items affect the assessed property in a way that is particular and distinct from their effect on other parcels and that real property in general and the public at large do not share. They contribute to a specific enhancement of the properties within the District. Since these improvements, including the community trails, were installed and are maintained specifically for the properties within the District; only properties within the District receive a special benefit and are assessed for said maintenance. General Benefit In addition to the special benefits received by parcels within the District, there are derivative general benefits that are conferred on parcels outside the boundaries of the District which include: • the control of dust and insect infestations, and • the visual enhancement of the area to persons or vehicles that may travel through the District. However it has been determined that these benefits are derivative and do not provide a direct benefit to parcels outside of the district that are not being assessed. Method of Assessment Each of the parcels within the District is deemed to receive special benefit from the improvements. Each parcel that has a special benefit conferred upon it as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements are identified and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel is determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of the improvements. To assess special benefit appropriately, it is necessary to relate the different type of parcel improvements to each other. The Equivalent Benefit Unit ("EBU") method of apportionment uses the single family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single family home equals one Equivalent Benefit Unit (EBU). Every other land-use is converted to EBUs based on an assessment formula that equates to the property's specific development status, type of development (land-use), and size of the property, as compared to a single family home. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land-use types, as assigned by County use code, to determine each parcel's EBU assignment. Land-Use E uivalent Dwellin Units Pro ert T e Count Use Code EBU Value Multi lier Single Family Residential 1.00 Dwelling Unit The use of the latest County Assessor's Secured Roll shall be the basis for the Property Type determination and units/acreage assignments, unless better data is available to the City. In addition, if any parcel within the District is identified by the County AuditorlController to be an invalid parcel number for the current fiscal year, the Property Type and EBU assignment shall be based on the correct parcel number andlor new parcel number(s) County use code and subsequent property information. If a single parcel has changed to multiple parcels, the EBU assignment and assessment amount applied to each of the new parcels will be recalculated rather than spread the proportionate share of the original assessment. Landscape Maintenance District No. 10 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 12 Fiscal Year 2011/12 The following table summarizes the Fiscal Year 2011/12 maximum allowable assessment rates for the District: Maximum Allowable Property Type Assessment Rate Actual Assessment Total Total (County Use Code) er EBU Rate per EBU UnitslAcres EBUs Single Family Residential $771.79 $616.20 751 751 The total amount of maintenance and incidental costs for maintaining the landscaping and community trail improvements is assessed to the individual parcels of real property within the District in proportion to the special benefit received by such parcels of real property. The proposed individual assessments are shown on the assessment roll in this report. Maximum and Historical Assessments The maximum allowable assessment rate per EBU listed above, is the amount which was approved in 2001/02, when the District was formed, and subsequent District annexations. Commencing in Fiscal Year 2002/03, the amount of the maximum allowable assessment is proposed to increase each year based upon the Consumer Price Index ("CPI"), All Urban Consumers, for the Los Angeles- Anaheim-San Bernardino Area, as determined by the United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics or its successor. Each year the percentage difference between the CPI for March of each year and the CPI for the previous March shall be computed. The assessment shall be adjusted by an amount not to exceed such percentage for the following fiscal year. Should the Bureau of Labor Statistics revise such index or discontinue preparation of such index, the revised index or a comparable system as approved by the City Council shall be used for determining fluctuations in the cost of living. Historical maximum assessment amounts and actual assessment amounts are shown in the table below: Fiscal Year Maximum Assessment er EBU Actual Assessment er EBU 2001/02 $597. 09 $597. 09 2002/03 613. 69 597. 09 2003/04 637. 75 597. 09 2004/05 648. 93 597. 09 2005/06 675. 03 597. 09 2006/07 706. 54 597. 09 2007/08 733. 65 616. 20 2008/09 757. 73 616. 20 2009/10 757. 73 616. 20 2011/12 771. 79 616. 20 Landscape Maintenance District No. 10 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 13 Fiscal Year 2011/12 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM An Assessment Diagram for the District is shown on the following page. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the County Assessor of the County San Bernardino, at the time this report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Engineer's Report. Landscape Maintenance District No. 10 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 14 Fiscal Year 2011/12 O yul 'i `1.1 y V ~~ C .~ a J ny ua~!II!W c ~ -.._.._.. ~ i i i I ! +_ ny epuenn!l3~ I ny ~a;sayoo~{ ny uaneH ~ _ i i ny esow~aH i i nt/ PIeQ!4o~H ~ - i ny uewllaH i lS ue!lawe~ ~ -- a N v N of sc z~ ~- U ny ti~a4~ a K N C V1 O J Q C U ~ ~ ~. J ~r~ \ J N ~ G1 N ® ~'' 0 0 N N J m ~ p N = N ~ 3 ~ 0 0 m ~i Q - ._.._.._.._..~.._.._.I _.._.._~A ~ Se i ! dl 3~ ~ ® i L ~ } ' ~ ny epuenny3 1 - t` f \ I t ~ i ~- - ~ ~ I - -- l i ny ~a;sayooa 1 / ~ ~ ! ` i / ~' ~1 I ~~- ~ 1 -- - ` 1 - -1 ~ - ~ i ny ua~!II!W ~ ~ ~~ ~ I _; - y _ - jny uaneH _ ' i - -~- - ~ - r inyesow~aH - - - --- - - -- - - - ~ I - ~ - - - - - - -- !ny Pley!4o~H i I l ~-'~ ny uewpaH it••~~ s v ~_ ! ny p~e%au!~ I ._ ~---% fi ~.•~ ~ '~ .._.-•ti.~ ..-- - -' ny anal ~. in ~_ m ~.. ..~ ~' L J _ 3 L ~•• ~ N L O a0 ~ ~ O Q c 0] LL m c l0 m ~~`§ ,aE~ tl 3 p~~ i ~dS~ ASSESSMENT ROLL Assessment Roll The assessment roll is a listing of the assessment for Fiscal Year 2011/12 apportioned to each lot or parcel, as shown on the last equalized roll of the Assessor of the County of San Bernardino. The following tables summarize the Fiscal Year 2011/12 maximum and actual assessments for the District: Maximum Allowable Maximum Property Type Assessment Rate Total Total Allowable Coun Use Code er EBU Units/Acres EBUs Assessment Single Family Residential $771.79 751.00 751.00 $579,614.29 Actual Property Type Assessment Rate Total Total Actual Count Use Code er EBU UnitslAcres EBUs Assessment Single Family Residential $616.20 751.00 751.00 $462,766.20 A copy of the full assessment roll is available for review in the City Clerk's office. Annexations There were no annexations effective for the 2011112 Fiscal Year. Landscape Maintenance District No. 10 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 15 Fiscal Year 2011/12 Item: L13. RDA -FIRE -CITY COUNCIL July 6, 2011 Approval of Resolutions initiating proceedings to levy annual assessments, preliminarily approve the annual levy reports, declaring the City Council's intention to levy annual assessments within Park and Recreation Improvement District No. PD-85 for Fiscal Year 2011/12 and setting the time and place for a public hearing thereon. NO INCREASE OF ASSESSMENT RATE FOR FY 2011/12 1S PROPOSED.(Reso/ution No. 11-101, Resolution No. 11-102 and Resolution No. 11-103J Revised Annual Engineer's Reports Fiscal Year 2011 /2012 The Engineer's Reports were reviewed under separate cover and were not intended to be included in the City Council and Staff Agenda packet distribution. The reports are now included in the Laserfiche Agenda packet archive for reference. P122 STAFF REPORT ~ ; ADMINISTR~-~TIVE SERVICES DEPr1RTMENT RANCHO Date: July 6, 2011 (,;UCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager ,,..- From: John R. Gillison, Assistant City Mana By: Ingrid Y. Bruce, GIS/Special Districts Manager Subject: CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF RESOLUTIONS INITIATING PROCEEDINGS TO LEVY ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS, PRELIMINARILY APPROVE THE ANNUAL LEVY REPORTS, DECLARING THE CITY COUNCIL'S INTENTION TO LEVY ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS WITHIN PARK AND RECREATION IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. PD-85 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2011/12 AND SETTING THE TIME AND PLACE FOR A PUBLIC HEARING THEREON. NO INCREASE OF ASSESSMENT RATE FOR FY 2011112 IS PROPOSED. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council approve the Resolutions initiating proceedings to levy annual assessments, preliminarily approve the annual levy reports, declaring the City Council's intention to levy annual assessments within Park and Recreation Improvement District No. PD-85. There is no increase to the current rates for fiscal year 2011/2012. The Engineer's Report is on file in the City Clerk's Office. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS PD-85 was originally created to provide funds to finance the cost of construction, maintenance, operation and debt payment of Heritage Community Park and Red Hill Community Park. Heritage Community Park is a 40-acre facility located on the southwest corner of Hillside Road and Beryl Street. Red Hill Community Park is 42 acres and is located on the southwest corner of Base Line Road and Vineyard Avenue. The District's boundary includes all of the City of Rancho Cucamonga with the general exception of land east of the Deer Creek Channel and the Victoria, Caryn and Terra Vista Planned Communities. The final debt service payment of the bonds that were sold to finance the construction of Red Hill and Heritage Community Parks were repaid on September 1, 2005. Subsequently with the debt repaid the annual assessments were decreased for all the property owners and the annual assessments levied and collected are dedicated to the on-going maintenance and operation, with periodic capital improvement expenditures, of the parks. Therefore, pursuant to the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972, each year the City Council must adopt resolutions initiating proceedings to levy the assessments, approve of the annual levy report and declare its intention to levy and collect assessments for the upcoming fiscal year. It is recommended that the assessment rates in PD-85 remain at existing levels for Fiscal Year 2011/2012. P123 CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF RESOLUTIONS DECLARING THE CITY COUNCIL'S Pnci~, 2 INTENTION TO LEVY ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS WITHIN PARK AND RECREATION IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. PD-85 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2011 / 12 AND SETTING THE TIME AND PLACE FOR A PUBLIC HEARING THEREON. ~~ 6, 2011 Assessments for PD-85 will be levied according to the following schedule: Definition Single Family Residential Multi-Family Residential Less than 1.50 acres 1.51 acres to 3.50 acres 3.51 acres to 7.00 acres 7.01 acres to 14.00 acres 14.01 acres to 25.00 acres 25.01 acres and larger Assessment per Parcel $31.00 $31.00 $15.50 $46.50 $108.50 $217.00 $434.00 $775.00 Attachments Resolutions Engineer's Report P 124 RESOLUTION NO. 1 ~~' ~ ~ 1 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO PROVIDE FOR THE ANNUAL LEVY AND COLLECTION OF ASSESSMENTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2011/2012 IN PARK AND RECREATION IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. PD-85 AND SETTING A TIME AND PLACE FOR A PUBLIC HEARING THEREON WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has previously formed that certain maintenance district and authorized the levy of assessments therein pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972," being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California (commencing with Section 22500) (the "1972 Act") in what is known and designated as Park and Recreation Improvement District No. PD 85 (the "District"); and WHEREAS, this City Council has initiated proceedings to provide for the annual levy of assessments for Fiscal Year 2011/12, to finance the costs and expenses necessary for continued maintenance and servicing of improvements within the District; and WHEREAS, at this time, there has been presented and approved by this City Council, a separate report for the District identified by the distinctive designation of such District and entitled "Fiscal Year 2011/12 Annual Levy Report" (the "Annual Levy Report") as required pursuant to Article 4 of Chapter 1 of the 1972 Act, Article XIIID of the Constitution of the State of California ("Article XIIID") and the Proposition 218 Omnibus Implementation Act (Government Code Section 53750 and following) (the "Implementation Act") (the 1972 Act, Article XIIID and the Implementation Act are referred to collectively as the "Assessment Law"), and this City Council desires to conduct the proceedings to authorize the levy of the annual assessments within the District; and WHEREAS, the annual assessments for Fiscal Year 2011/12 proposed to be levied within the District as set forth in the report do hot exceed the annual assessments as previously authorized to be levied within such District and, therefore, the proposed levy of assessments for Fiscal Year 2011/2012 within such District are not deemed to be "increased" over the maximum authorized annual assessments. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, DETERMINED AND ORDERED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, as follows: SECTION 1. Recitals. The above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2. Improvements and Maintenance and Servicing Thereof. The public interest and convenience requires, and it is the intention of this City Council, to undertake proceedings for the annual levy and collection of assessments within the District for the continued maintenance and servicing of the improvements authorized to be maintained and serviced within such District. "Maintenance" may include the furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operation, and servicing of any improvement, including: (a) repair, removal, or replacement of all or any part of any improvement; (b) providing for the life, growth, health, P125 and beauty of landscaping, including cultivation, irrigation, trimming, spraying, fertilizing, or treating for disease or injury; (c) the removal of trimmings, rubbish, debris, and other solid waste; and, (d) the cleaning, sandblasting, and painting of walls and other improvements to remove or cover graffiti. "Service" may include the .furnishing of: (a) electric current or energy, gas, or other illuminating agent for the lighting or operation of any improvements; and, (b) water for the irrigation of any landscaping, the operation of any fountains, or the maintenance of any other improvements. A description of the improvements to be maintained and the maintenance and services to be provided is set forth in Appendix A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. SECTION 3. Annual Levy Report. The Annual Levy Report regarding the annual levy for the District for Fiscal Year 2011-2012, has been previously approved and directed to be filed in the office the City Clerk. Reference is made to such Report for the District for a full and detailed description of the improvements to be maintained and serviced, the boundaries of such District and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within such District. SECTION 4. Assessment. The public interest and convenience requires, and it is the intention of this City Council to order the annual levy of assessments for the District as set forth and described in the Annual Levy Report, and further it is determined to be in the best public interest and convenience to levy and collect annual assessments to pay the costs and expenses of such maintenance and service as estimated in such Annual Levy Report. SECTION 5. Boundaries Of District. The proposed maintenance and service work as described in the Annual Levy Report for the District is, in the opinion of this City Council, of special benefit to the properties within the boundaries of such District, and this City Council makes the costs and expenses of such maintenance and service chargeable upon such District, which District said City Council hereby declares to be the District specially benefited by such maintenance and service, and to be further assessed pursuant to the Assessment Law to pay the costs and expenses thereof. The District shall include each and every parcel of land within the boundaries thereof; as such District is shown on a map or maps as approved by this City Council and on file in the Office of the City Clerk, and so designated by the name of such District. SECTION 6. Public Hearing. Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held the 3rd day of August, 2011, at the hour of 7:00 o'clock p.m. or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard, in the regular meeting of the City Council, being in the Council Chambers located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California, which is the time and place fixed by this City Council for the hearing of protests or objections in reference to the annual levy of assessments, to the extent of the maintenance, by any interested person and any other matters contained in this resolution. Any persons who wish to object to the proceedings for the annual levy should file a written protest with the City Clerk prior to the time set and scheduled for said public hearing. P126 SECTION 7. For Information Regarding Proceedings. For any and all information relating to the proceedings, protest procedure, any documentation and/or information ,of a procedural or technical nature, your attention is directed to the below listed person at the City: Ingrid Bruce GIS/Special Districts Manager City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 (909) 477-2700, Ext 2575 SECTION 8. Notice. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to publish, pursuant to Government Code Section 6061, a copy of this Resolution in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin, a newspaper of general circulation within said City, said publication shall be made one time and not less than ten (10) days before the date set for the Public Hearing. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this day of July, 2011. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: L. Dennis Michael, Mayor ATTEST: Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk I, Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of said City Council held on 2011. Executed this , at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk P127 Appendix A Descriptions of Improvements and Maintenance and Services This Appendix A contains a general description of the improvements to be maintained and serviced and a description of such maintenance and services. 1. The maintenance and operation of Heritage Community Park including, but not limited to, grading, planting, irrigation, onsite roads, sidewalks; parking lots, lighting, restrooms, equestrian facilities, playground equipment, picnic facilities, athletic facilities, and walking, jogging and equestrian trails and sanitary sewer connections. 2. The maintenance and operation of Red Hill Community Park including, but not limited to, grading, planting, irrigation, onsite roads, sidewalks, parking lots, lighting, waterscape, restrooms, senior citizen facilities, playground equipment, picnic facilities, major lighted athletic facilities, jogging trail, sanitary sewer connections and onsite drainage inlets. A-1 P128 RESOLUTION NO. /I-%~.~ RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE PREPARATION OF ANNUAL LEVY REPORT PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE ASSESSMENT LAW FOR PROCEEDINGS FOR THE ANNUAL ASSESSMENT LEVY WITHIN PARK AND RECREATION IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. PD-85 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2011/12 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, previously undertaken proceedings to form and has formed that certain maintenance district pursuant to pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California (commencing with Section 22500) (the "1972 Act"), known and designated as Park and Recreation Improvement District No. PD-85 (the "District"); and WHEREAS, at this time the City Council desires to initiate proceedings pursuant to Chapter 3 of the 1972 Act to provide for the annual levy of assessments for the next ensuing fiscal year to provide for the annual costs for maintenance and servicing of improvements within the District; and WHEREAS, the proceedings for the annual levy of assessments shall relate to the fiscal year commencing July 1, 2011, and ending June 30, 2012 ("Fiscal Year 2011/12"). NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, DETERMINED AND ORDERED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, as follows: SECTION 1. Recitals. The above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2. New Improvements or Substantial Changes in Existing Improvements. No new improvements are .proposed to be added to the improvements to be maintained or serviced and no substantial changes in the existing improvements are proposed to be made for Fiscal Year 2011 /12. SECTION 3. Annual Levy Report. The City Engineer is hereby ordered to prepare and file with this City Council an Annual Levy Report for the District relating to such annual assessment and levy in such District in accordance with the provisions of 1972 Act, Article XIIID of the Constitution of the State of California ("Article XIIID") and the Proposition 218 Omnibus Implementation Act (Government Code Section 53750 and following) (the "Implementation Act") (the 1972 Act, Article XIIID and the Implementation Act are referred to collectively as the "Assessment Law"). SECTION 4. Filing of the Annual Levy Report. Upon completion, the Annual Levy Report for the District shall be filed with the City Clerk, who shall then submit the same to this City Council for its consideration pursuant to the Assessment Law. P129 PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this day of July, 2011 AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: ATTEST: Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk L. Dennis Michael, Mayor I, Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of said City Council held on 2011. Executed this at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk P130 RESOLUTION NO. I r- C L~~3 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, PRELIMINARILY APPROVING THE ANNUAL LEVY REPORT FOR THE ANNUAL LEVY OF ASSESSMENTS WITHIN PARK AND RECREATION IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. PD-85 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2011/12 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, pursuant to the provisions of Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of. California (the "1972 Act"), Article XIIID of the Constitution of the State of California ("Article XIIID") and the Proposition 218 Omnibus Implementation Act (Government Code Section 53750 and following) (the "Implementation Act") (the 1972 Act, Article XIIID and the Implementation Act are referred to collectively as the "Assessment Law"), did, by previous Resolution, order the preparation of a report for the annual levy of assessments for Fiscal Year 2011-2012 (the "Annual Levy Report") in a certain maintenance assessment district known and designated as Park and Recreation Improvement District No. PD 85 (the "District"); and WHEREAS, there has now been presented to this City Council the Annual Levy Report for the District as required by the Assessment Law and as previously directed 6y Resolution; and WHEREAS, this City Council has now examined and reviewed the Annual Levy Report as presented, and is satisfied with each and all of the items and documents as set forth in such report, and is satisfied that the assessments on a preliminary basis, have been spread within the District in accordance with the special benefits received from the improvements to be maintained and serviced, as set forth in the Annual Levy Report. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, DETERMINED AND ORDERED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, as follows: SECTION 1. Recitals. The above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2. Annual Levy Reports. The Annual Levy Report for the District as presented, consisting of the following: A. Plans and specifications describing the general nature, location and extent of the improvements to be maintained and serviced and the extent of such maintenance; B. An estimate of the cost of the maintenance of the improvements for the District for Fiscal Year 2011/12; C. A diagram for the District, showing the area and properties proposed to be assessed; and P131 D. An annual assessment for Fiscal Year 2011/2012 of the estimated costs of the maintenance and servicing of those improvements to be maintained and serviced during such Fiscal Year; assessing the net amount upon all assessable lots and/or parcels within such District in proportion to the special benefits received is hereby approved on a preliminary basis and is ordered to be filed in the Office of the City Clerk as a permanent record and to remain open for public inspection. SECTION 3. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Resolution, and the minutes of this meeting shall so reflect the presentation of the Annual Levy Report. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this day of July 2011. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: ATTEST: L. Dennis Michael, Mayor Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk I, Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of said City Council held on 2011. Executed this , at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk Item: L13. RDA -FIRE -CITY COUNCIL July 6, 2011 Approval of Resolutions initiating proceedings to levy annual assessments, preliminarily approve the annual levy reports, declaring the City Council's intention to levy annual assessments within Park and Recreation Improvement District No. PD-85 for Fiscal Year 2011/12 and setting the time and place for a public hearing thereon. NO INCREASE OF ASSESSMENT RATE FOR FY 2011/12 IS PROPOSED.jResolution No. 11-101, Resolution No. 11-102 and Resolution No. 11-103J Revised Annual Engineer's Reports Fiscal Year 2011 /2012 The Engineer's Reports were reviewed under separate cover and were not intended to be included in the City Council and Staff Agenda packet distribution. The reports are now included in the Laserfiche Agenda packet archive for reference. Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2011/2012 City of Rancho Cucamonga PARKS AND RECREATION IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. PD-85 Approved: Mark A. Steueq Director Engineering Services/City Engineer TABLE OF CONTENTS Authority for Report .............................................................................. 3 Findings .............................................................................. 3 District Analysis .............................................................................. 4 Estimate of Work .............................................................................. 4 Method of Spread .................................................................................... 6 Calendar Year Annexations ............................................................ 8 Boundary Map ..............................................................................9 2 City of Rancho Cucamonga Annual Report PD-85 Fiscal Year 2011/2012 AUTHORITY POR REPORT This report for the 2011/2012 fiscal year is prepared pursuant to the order of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972, being Division 15, Section 22500 of the Streets and Highways code. Provisions for this annual assessment are included in Chapter 3 of the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972. The purpose of this report is to set forth findings and the assessment analysis for the annual levy of assessments for the Park and Recreation Improvement District No. PD-85 thereafter referred to as "the District". This District, using direct benefit assessments, was originally created to provide funds to finance the cost of construction, maintenance, operation and debt payment of Heritage Community Park and Red Hill Community Park in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Subsequently the debt has been repaid with only the ongoing maintenance and operation with periodic capital improvement expenditures of the parks remaining. FINDINGS Section 22573, Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972, requires assessments to be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. The section states: "The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements." The means of determining whether or not a parcel will benefit from the improvements is contained in the Improvement Act of 1911 (Division 7, commencing with Section 5000 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California). The 1972 Act also provides for the classification of various areas within an assessment district into benefit areas where, by reason of variations in the nature, location, and extent ofthe improvements, the various areas will receive differing degrees of all territory receiving substantially the same degree of benefit from the improvements and may consist of contiguous or noncontiguous areas. As the assessments are levied on the basis of benefit, they are considered a user's fee, not a tax; and, therefore, are not governed by Article XIIIA. Properties owned by public agencies, such as a city, county, state, or the federal governments is not assessable without the approval of the particular agency and, normally, are not assessed. Certain other parcels used for railroad mainline right-of--way, public 3 utility transmission right-of--way, and common areas are also exempt from assessment. The assessment for mobile home parks will be based upon underlying lot acreage. DISTRICT ANALYSIS A. District Boundary The district includes all of the City of Rancho Cucamonga with the general exception of land east of Deer Creek Channel and the Victoria, Caryn & Terra Vista Planned Communities. All parcels of real property affected are more particularly described in maps prepared in accordance with Section 327 of the Revenue and Taxation Code, which are on file in the office of the San Bernardino County Assessor in the Hall of Records, 172 West Third Street, San Bernardino, California and which are hereby made a part hereof by reference. B. District Name City of Rancho Cucamonga Park and Recreation Improvement District No. PD - 85. C. Facilities The existing works within the District boundary are generally described as follows: 1. The maintenance and operation of Heritage Community Park including, but not limited to, grading, planting, irrigation, onsite roads, sidewalks, parking lots, lighting, restrooms, equestrian Facilities, playground equipment, picnic facilities, athletic facilities, and walking, jogging and equestrian trails and sanitary sewer connections. 2. The maintenance and operation of Red Hill Community Park including, but not limited to, grading, planting, irrigation, onsite roads, sidewalks, parking lots, lighting, waterscape, restrooms, senior citizen facilities, playground equipment, picnic facilities, major lighted athletic facilities, jogging trail, sanitary sewer connections and onsite drainage inlets. D. The assessment rate for the 2011/2012 PY is $31.00. No increase to this assessment rate is proposed. It is estimated that this assessment rate will cover the district's maintenance and operation expenses for the 2011/2012 FY. 4 ESTIMATE OF WORK "1'he Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 permits carrying forward surpluses or recovering deficits in subsequent fiscal years. Costs for the district will be reviewed annually. Any surplus credited against assessment or any deficits shall be included in the assessment for the following fiscal year. Proposed Maintenance Budget: FY 20]0/201] PROJECTED REVENUE $1,069,680.00 Personnel Services Regular Salaries $534,860.00 Overtime Salaries 3,680.00 Part Time Salaries 26,160.00 Fringe Benefits 253,570.00 Subtotal $807,320.00 Onerations & Maintenance Operations & Maintenance $119,750.00 Operations & Maintenance -Facilities 5,000.00 Vehicle Operations & Maintenance 1,000.00 Emergency Equipment & Veh. Rntl 3,000.00 Equip Operations & Maint. 10,000.00 Contract Services 33,370.00 Contract Services/Facilities 0.00 Tree Maintenance 18,200.00 Telephone Utilities 6,250.00 Water Utilities 222,980.00 Electric Utilities 117,440.00 Assessment Administration 152,550.00 Admin./General Overhead 78,420.00 Subtotal $767,960.00 Capital Outlay Capital Outlay - Improv. Other than Bldg 75,000.00 Capital Project 0.00 Subtotal 75,000.00 Total PD-85 Expenditure Budget $1,661,230.00 Operating Reserve Contribution -587,220.00 Projected Revenue Total District Assessment Total District Parcel Count $1,074,010.00 $1,149,190.00 27,733 5 Each year, prior to the assessments being placed on the tax roll, the City will review the budget and determine the amount needed to maintain the improvements for the upcoming fiscal year. The actual assessment will be based on the estimated costs of maintenance, available fund balance and maximum allowable assessment with the goal of maintaining the improvements in a satisfactory and healthy condition. "I'he actual assessment amount may be lower than the maximum allowable assessment; however it may not exceed the maximum unless the increase is approved by the property owners in accordance with Proposition 218. It is the intent of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to maintain an Operating Reserve which shall not exceed the estimated costs of maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or when the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The reserve balance information for the District is as follows: j Estimated Fiscal Ycar Ending June 30, 2011 Reserve Fund Balance $1,456,171.00 Operating Reserve Contribution-Fiscal Year 2011/12 (587,220) Operating Reserve Collection -Fiscal Year 201 1 /12 0.00 Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2012 Reserve Fund Balance $868,951 Definitions of Budget /terns The Following definitions describe the costs and expenses included in the District Budget: Personnel Services Regular Salaries: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all full-time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Overtime Salaries: This item includes costs attributed to work performed by full-time employees over and above their normal scheduled hours. Pari Time Salaries: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all part time employees dedicated to maintenance of the parks improvements. Fringe Benefits: This item includes the benefits available to City employees: health care, vacation, sick time, and retirement fund. Operations and Maintenance Contract Services: This item includes the contract costs of a landscape maintenance company responsible for the ongoing maintenance of the parks improvements. 6 Tree Maintenance: This item includes the contract costs attributed to maintaining the street trees and other trees throughout the parks. Utilities -Water: This item includes the costs to furnish water for the landscaping and parks. Utilities -Electric: This item includes the costs to furnish electricity required for the operation and maintenance of the parks lighting, sprinklers and irrigation controllers. Assessment Administration: This item includes the cost to all particular departments and staff of the City, and consultants for providing the administration, coordination and management of District services, operations, and incidental expenses related to the District. This item also includes creation of an annual engineer's report, resolutions and placing the assessment amounts onto the County tax roll each year, along with responding to any public inquiries and future Proposition 218 balloting proceedings. General Overhead: Phis item includes the costs of all departments and staff of the City for providing the coordination of District services, inspections, annual bid management, responding to public concerns, public education, accounting, auditing and procedural matters associated with the District. This item also includes an allocation for general City staff time for administrative functions and systems that provide for a functional and operational assessment district within the City's administrative structure. Capital Expenditures: Capital Projects: This item includes new improvements to further enhance the level and quality of service provided within the boundaries of the District. This may include new monuments, irrigation systems, and other large improvements. Operating Reserve Collection: Operating Reserve Collection: This item includes the amount to be collected to maintain reserves to enable the City to pay for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or whenever the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The Reserve Fund contribution will continue until such a time the Reserve Fund balance is approximately one half of the annual costs. The fund may be allowed to accumulate in anticipation of any unforeseen expenses not included in the yearly maintenance costs. This may include, but is not limited lo, tree replacements, repair of damaged equipment due to vandalism, storms and other similar events. METHOD OF SPREAD The Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 indicates that assessments may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes costs among all lots or parcels within the District in proportion to the estimated benefit received. A. Definitions The District is divided into three categories for the purpose of determining the assessments as follows: CATEGORY A -includes parcels based on the number of existing residential units within certain ranges of parcel size. CA"1'EGORY B -includes all parcels not defined in Category A or Category C. CATEGORY C -includes exempt parcels. Exempt parcels were discovered by searching the County Assessor's computer tapes for those parcels that are listed as exempt by the Assessor or which have an assessed value of less than $500. In conducting the search, several parcels were included as exempt that show parcel sizes in excess of 1.5 acres and type codes of, for example, residential or agriculture. "These parcels were added back into the rolls and assessed. B. Formula The assessment Formula is based on actual land use information contained in the current San Bernardino Assessor's computer files and Assessor's parcel maps. Category A: All parcels containing existing residential dwelling units and meeting the following conditions. Parcel Sizc/Ranee Less than 1.5 Acres and 1.51 to 35. Acres and 3.51 to 7.0 Acres and 7.01 to 14.0 dwelling units 14.01 to 25.0 Acres and 25.01 acres and larger Dwellin¢ Units/Parcel 1 or more dwelling units 2 or more dwelling units 4 or more dwelling units 8 or dwelling units 15 or more dwelling units 26 or more dwelling units Category A is based on the number ofexisting residential units. The actual assessment for Bond Debt Service per existing residential dwelling unit may decrease each year as more residential units are built within the improvement district. Maintenance costs, however, are expected to increase annually and will somewhat offset the anticipated decrease in assessments due to new development. Category B: All parcels not defined in Category A or Category C. Category C: All exempt parcels as defined below: 1. All properties currently tax exempt; 2. All public ownership; 3. Railroad mainline rights-of--way 4. Major utility transmission rights-of--way; 5. Mineral rights; 6. Parcels so small they currently cannot be built upon; 7. All normally assessable parcels within an assessed valuation of less than $500 and 1.5 acres or less; and, C. Summary of Preliminary Assessment Amounts Category A: The preliminary estimated assessment rate, which will be levied during fiscal year 2009/2010, is $31.00 per dwelling unit for those parcels in Category A. Category A parcels containing more than one residential dwelling unit will be assessed for an amount equal to $31.00 times the number of dwelling units. Category B: The assessment, which may be levied for parcels within Category B during fiscal year 2011/2012, shall be according to the following schedule: Definition Single-Family Residential Multi-Family Residential Less than 1.5 Acres 1.51 Acres to 3.50 Acres 3.51 Acres to 7.0 Acres 7.01 Acres to 14.0 Acres ] 4.0 ] Acres to 25.0 Acres 25.01 Acres and larger Assessment Per Parcel $31.00 $31.00 $15.50 $46.50 $108.50 $217.00 $434.00 $775.00 Category C: The assessment shall be $0.00 for Category C parcels. 9 Calendar Year 2010 Annexations Parks and Recreation District - PD-85 PROJECT UNITS ANNEX. DATE 10 m N 0 ~ ~~ a ~ D ~ ~ ~ J ~ ~ Op .~ ~ ' .~+ Q C U Q ~n ~ o V ~ I ~ t; .` N ~ ~ nd /~Jay~ J ti.r o ,~ ; .._.._.._.._. ~ N ~ o ~ i J m ~ ^,~ O W ' ~ "'' p m O ~ 1 li Q AY/ ' ~ ..~..~ L ~Iw nd;sa3 vJ W ~ ~ y i ny epuenn!;3 ny epuenn!;3 Q 1 1 ~8 ~aaJ~ /lea ti_.._.._.._.._.._.._..~ ny Ja;sayooy ! - ~ ny Ja;say~o~ ~~..~ 1 ny ua~!II!W ny ua~l!II!W ny uaneH ny uaneH ny esowJaH ~ ny esowJaH n`d Pleq!yoJH n`d Pleq!y~J'd ny uewllaH ~ nd uewllaH ~ r .. w v ny p el~au!n ;S ULIIaUJe~ ~.~s8~~:eg,gas L~~r~$~Q~~k~ 6`a_•Y« u ~i S~fiE3 fi€E$Q`= S$S$ ig € in °' m ~ ~ ny anoJ~ paQ~~~°o~ ~ '~~~S!Za~~~~~s ~ O oO ~ ~ e U7 ~ C m ~ Q ~~~~~s~'4~~~~ ~ e 6~~e~~fY~n€ m $4~sfg ggas~ ~\ J ~`c Qaa~9esiTit~~ P132 STAFF REPORT ADMINISTRr1TIVE SERVICES DEPr1RTb'IENT Date: July 6, 2011 To: Mayor and Members of City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager __ ~~ From: John R. Gillison, Assistant City Manage By: Ingrid Bruce, GIS/Special Districts Manager ~ Subject: CONSIDERATION OF ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION TO AUTHORIZE THE CITY MANAGER OR HIS DESIGNEE TO SUBMIT ASSESSMENT .BALLOTS ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA IN THE PROCEEDINGS TO FORM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO 2-R. RECOMMENDATION Adopt a resolution authorizing the City Manager or his designee to complete and submit assessment ballots on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga in the proceedings to form the City of Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No 2-R ("LMD 2-R"). BACKGROUND The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga (the "City") has initiated proceedings to consider the formation of LMD 2-R to replace existing Landscape Maintenance District No 2 and to provide for the levy of special assessments within LMD 2-R to finance the maintenance and servicing of the paseos, parkways, median islands, street trees, parks, landscaped sites and appurtenant facilities that are throughout the Victoria Planned Community. These improvements are located within the street right-of-ways, dedicated public easements and parks which are within the boundaries of the District. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 4 of Article XIIID of the California Constitution ("Article XIIID"), the City retained the services of NBS to provide assessment engineering services pertaining to the proceedings to consider the formation of LMD 2-R, including but not limited to, the identification of those properties that will receive special benefit from the maintenance and servicing of the improvements. NBS has determined that certain properties owned by the City and located within the proposed boundaries will receive special benefit from the maintenance and servicing of the improvements. The City of Rancho Cucamonga properties (the "City Properties") are located at 12427, 12467 and 12525 Baseline Road, 7086 Etiwanda Avenue and 6940 Benevento Place and, pursuant to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No 2-R Fiscal Year 2011/12 Engineer's Report (the "Engineer's Report") dated June-2011 and submitted by NBS. Assessments totaling $11,576.90 are proposed to be levied against the City Properties for Fiscal Year 2011/12 to represent the special benefit to be received by the City Properties. P133 CONSIDERATION OF ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION TO AUTHORIZE THE CITY PAGE: 2 MANAGER OR HIS DESIGNEE TO SUBMIT ASSESSMENT BALLOTS ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA IN THE PROCEEDINGS TO FORM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO 2-R. JU1,Y 6, 2011 Staff has reviewed the Engineer's Report and concurs with NBS that the proposed assessments accurately reflect such special benefit to be received by the City Properties. Article XIIID of the California Constitution provides that a record owner proposed to be assessed in a Proposition 218 ballot process may express such owner's supporrf~or or opposition to the levy of a proposed assessment against such owner's property by completing and submitting an assessment ballot. For property owned by a public entity, "record owner" means the authorized representative of that public entity. Accordingly, with respect to the City owned properties mentioned above, the City Manager of the City of Rancho Cucamonga may submit completed assessment ballots on behalf of the City Council, if so authorized. Staff recommends that the City Council authorize assessment ballots to be completed and submitted on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga in support of the levy of the proposed assessments against the City Properties for Fiscal Year 2011/12. The attached resolution, if adopted designates the City Manager or his designee to complete and submit assessment ballots on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga in support of the levy of the proposed assessments against the City Properties. Attachment Resolution P134 RESOLUTION NO. ~/ a A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER OR HIS DESIGNEE TO SUBMIT ASSESSMENT BALLOTS ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA IN THE PROCEEDINGS TO FORM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2-R. AND PROVIDING DIRECTION ON THE SUBMISSION OF SAID ASSESSMENT BALLOTS WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga (the "City"), acting underthe Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 (the "1972 ACT"),Article XIIID of the Constitution of the State of California ("Article XIIID") and the Proposition 218 Omnibus Implementation Act ("Proposition 218"), (the 1972 Act, Article XIIID and Proposition 218 are collectively referred to as the "Assessment Law"), approved the commencement of procedures for the formation of Landscape Maintenance District No. 2-R ("LMD 2-R") to replace Landscape Maintenance District No: 2 and the levy of assessments within Landscape Maintenance District No. 2-R, so that property owners may approve increased funding for the maintenance and servicing of improvements; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of Section 4 of Article XIIID of the California Constitution, the City retained the services of NBS to provide assessment engineering services pertaining to the proceedings to consider the formation of LMD 2-R, including but not limited to, the identification of those properties that will receive special benefit from the maintenance and servicing of the improvements; and WHEREAS, NBS has determined that certain properties owned by the City and located within the proposed boundaries of LMD 2-R will receive special benefits from the maintenance and servicing of the improvements; and WHEREAS, such City of Rancho Cucamonga properties (the "City Properties") are located at 12427, 12467 and 12525 Baseline Road, 7086 Etiwanda Avenue and 6940 Benevento Place and pursuant to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 2-R Fiscal Year 2011/12 Engineer's Report (the "Engineer's Report") dated June 2011 and prepared and submitted by NBS to the City Council, assessments of $11,576.90 are proposed to be levied against the City Properties for Fiscal Year 2011 /12 (the "Proposed Assessments") to represent the special benefits to be received by the City Properties; and WHEREAS, the City Council has, pursuant to the Assessment Law, set a public hearing to be held on July 20, 2011 to consider the formation of LMD 2-Rand the levy of assessments therein and directed the City Clerk to give notice of such public. hearing; together with assessment ballots pursuant to which the record owners of all properties proposed to be assessed may express their support for or their opposition to the proposed levy of assessments against their properties; and WHEREAS, the City Council concurs that the Proposed Assessments represent the special benefits to be received by the City Properties and has determined that it would be in the public interest for the City to support the levy of the Proposed Assessment on the City Properties. P135 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, DETERMINED AND ORDERED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, as follows: SECTION 1. That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2. That the City Council hereby designates the City Manager or his designee as the representative of the City of Rancho Cucamonga for the purpose of completing and submitting assessment ballots on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga pertaining to the Proposed Assessments applicable to the City Properties and directs the City Manager or his designee to complete the assessment ballots to indicate the support of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to the levy of the Proposed Assessments against the City Properties. SECTION 3. That this resolution shall become effective upon its adoption. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this _ day of July, 2011. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: L. Dennis Michael, Mayor ATTEST: Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk I, JANICE C. REYNOLDS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the day of July 2011. Executed this day of July 2011 at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk P136 STAFF REPORT ENGINEERII~~G SER~'ICE~ DEP.~RT~IENT Date: July 6, 2011 To: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager From: Mark A. Steuer, Director of Engineering Services Department By: Willie Valbuena, Assistant Engineer ~\ ~ RANCHO C;UCAMONGA Subject: APPROVAL OF MAP, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES, MONUMENTATION CASH DEPOSIT AND ORDERING THE ANNEXATION TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 10 AND STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 7 FOR TRACT 18032, LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF DAY CREEK BOULEVARD, SOUTH OF VINTAGE DRIVE, SUBMITTED BY HERITAGE HOMES OF CALIFORNIA, INC. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolutions approving the Final Map, accepting the subject Improvement Agreement, Improvement Securities, Monumentation Cash Deposit and ordering the annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 10 and Street Light Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 7 for Tract 18032 and authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said agreements and authorizing the City Clerk to cause said map to record. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18032, located on the west side of Day Creek Boulevard, south of Vintage Drive, in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwellings units per acre) in the Etiwanda North Specific Plan, was approved by the Planning Commission on April 9, 2008. This project is for a residential subdivision of 23 single family lots on 7.74 acres of land. The Developer, Heritage Homes of California, Inc., is submitting an Improvement Agreement, Improvement Securities and Monumentation Cash Deposit to guarantee the construction of the public improvements in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond $ 483,700.00 Labor and Material Bond $ 483,700.00 Monumentation Cash Deposit $ 3,766.00 Copies of the agreement and securities are available in the City Clerk's Office. The Consent and Waiver to Annexation forms signed by the Developer are on file in the City Clerk's Office. R submitted, Mark A. Steuer Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer P137 City of. Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Division Vicinity Map WILSON w AVENUE W Z '~ Q W ~ ~ BAPJYAN AVENUE ~ ~ ~ ~ VINTAGE OR1VE '' s'~~' ~k:~~r~:. S~Al'E R~!'E 210 FR£E~AY P138 RESOLUTION NO. f /- f~J A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE FINAL MAP, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES AND MONUMENTATION CASH DEPOSIT FOR TRACT 18032 WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Map 18032, submitted by Meritage Homes of California, Inc. and consisting of a subdivision of 7.74 acres of land into 23 single family lots, located on the west side of Day Creek Boulevard, south of Vintage Drive, in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwellings units per acre) of the Etiwanda North Specific Plan, was approved by the Planning Commission on April 9, 2008; and WHEREAS, Tract Map 18032 is the final map of the division of land approved as shown on the Tentative Tract Map; and WHEREAS, all the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the final map by the City Council of said City have now been met by entry into an Improvement Agreement and posting the Improvement Securities and Monumentation Cash Deposit by Meritage Homes of California, Inc., as developer; and NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, HEREBY RESOLVES, that said Improvement Agreement, Improvement Securities and Monumentation Cash Deposit submitted by said developer be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the City Clerk attest; and that the offers of dedication of the final map delineating the same said Tract Map 18032 is hereby approved and the City Engineer is authorized to present same to the County Recorder of San Bernardino County; California, to be filed for record. P139 RESOLUTION NO. ~~" ~~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 10 (RANCHO ETIWANDA) FOR TRACT 18032 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has previously formed a special maintenance district pursuant to the terms of the "Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California (the "Act", said special maintenance district known and designated as Landscape Maintenance District No. 10 (Rancho Etiwanda) (the "District"); and WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the Act authorize the annexation of additional territory to the District ;and WHEREAS, such provisions also provide that the requirement for the preparation of resolutions, and assessment engineer's report, notices of public hearing and the right of majority protest may be waived in writing with the written consent of all of the owners of property within the territory to be annexed; and WHEREAS, notwithstanding that such provisions of the Act related to the annexation of territory to the District, Article XIII D of the Constitution of the State of California (Article XIII D") establishes certain procedural requirements for the authorization to levy assessments which apply to the levy of annual assessments for the District on the territory proposed to be annexed to such District; and WHEREAS, the owners of certain property described in Exhibit A attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, have requested that such property (collectively, the "Territory") be annexed to the District in order to provide for the levy of annual assessments to finance the maintenance of certain- improvements described in Exhibit B hereto (the "Improvements"); and .WHEREAS, all of the owners of the Territory have filed with the City Clerk duly executed forms entitled "Consent And Waiver To Annexation Of Certain Real Property To A Maintenance District And Approval Of The Levy Of Assessments On Such Real Property" (the "Consent and Waiver"); and WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the Act to the annexation of the Territory to the District and have expressly consented to the annexation of the Territory to the District; and WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have also expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the Act and/or Article XIII D applicable to the authorization to levy the proposed annual assessment against the Territory set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference and have declared support for, consent to and approval of the authorization to levy such proposed annual assessment set forth in Exhibit C attached hereto; and TRACT 18032 P140 WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have also expressly agreed for themselves, their heirs, successors and assigns that: (1) The proportionate special benefit derived by each parcel in the Territory from the District Improvements has been determined in relationship to the entirety of the maintenance and operation expenses of the Improvements; (2) The proposed annual assessment does not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit from the Improvements conferred on each parcel in the Territory. (3) Only the special benefits derived or to be derived by each parcel in the Territory from the Improvements have been included in the proposed annual assessment. WHEREAS, at this time the City Council desires to order the annexation of the Territory to the District and to authorize the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit C hereto. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are true and correct. SECTION 2: The City Council hereby finds and determines that: a. The annual assessments proposed to be levied on each parcel in the Territory do not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on each such parcel from the Improvements. b. The proportional .special benefit derived by each parcel in the Territory from the Improvements has been determined in relationship to the entirety of the cost of the maintenance of the Improvement. c. Only special benefits will be assessed on the Territory by the levy of the proposed annual assessments. SECTION 3: This legislative body hereby orders the annexation the Territory to the District, approves the financing of the maintenance of the Improvements from the proceeds of annual assessments to be levied against the Territory and approves and orders the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit C. SECTION 4: All future proceedings of the District, including the levy of all assessments, shall be applicable to the Territory. TRACT 18032 P141 Exhibit A Identification of the Owner and Description of the Property to be Annexed The Owner of the Property is: MERITAGE HOMES OF CALIFORNIA, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION The legal description of the Property is: THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 1 .NORTH, RANGE 6 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN, IN THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO THE OFFICIAL PLAT THEREOF. EXCEPT THERE FROM A STRIP 20 FEET WIDE ALONG THE WEST SIDE THEREOF. ALSO EXCEPTING THERE FROM THAT PORTION CONVEYED TO THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, BY .GRANT DEED RECORDED MAY 11, 1999 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 19990201923, OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. Assessor's Parcels Numbers of the Property: 0225.161-65 AND 0225-161-71 TRACT 18032 P142 Exhibit B Description of the District Improvements Fiscal Year 2010/2011 Landscape Maintenance District No. 10 (Rancho Etiwanda): Landscape Maintenance District No. 10 (Rancho Etiwanda) (the "Maintenance District") represents landscape sites throughout the Rancho Etiwanda Area. ~~The various sites maintained by the district consist of parkways, median islands, street trees and a neighborhood park. Proposed additions to the Improvements for Project Tract 18032: STREET TREES: 85 EACH TRACT 18032 P143 Exhibit C Proposed Annual Assessment Fiscal Year 2010/2011 Landscape Maintenance District No. 10 (Rancho Etiwanda): The rate per Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU) is $616.20 for the fiscal year 2010/2011. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Landscape Maintenance District No. 10 (Rancho Etiwanda) for Tract 18032: Land Use Basis EDU Factor* Rate per EDU* Sin le Famil Unit 1.00 $616.20 Multi-Famil Unit 1.00 $616.20 Non Residential Im roved Acre 2.00 $616.20 Vacant Acre 0.25 $616.20 *EDU means Equivalent Dwelling Unit. The proposed annual assessment for the property described in Exhibit A is as follows: 23 Units x 1 EDU Factor x 6$ 16.20 Rate Per EDU = $ 14,172.60 Annual Assessment *Commencing with Fiscal Year 2002/03, the amount of the assessment for the District is proposed to increase each year, based upon the Consumer Price Index ("CPI"), All Urban Consumers, for the Los Angeles-Anaheim-San Bernardino Area, as determined by the United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, or its successor. The Engineer shall compute the percentage difference between the CPI for March of each year and the CPI for the previous March, and shall then adjust the existing assessment by an amount not to exceed such percentage for the following year. TRACT 18032 P 144 RESOLUTION NO. II`"!L~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 7 (NORTH ETIWANDA) FOR TRACT 18032 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has previously formed a special maintenance district pursuant to the terms of the "Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California (the "Act", said special maintenance district known and designated as Street Light Maintenance District No. 7 (North Etiwanda) (the "District"); and WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the Act authorize the annexation of additional territory to the District ;and WHEREAS, such provisions also provide that the requirement for the preparation of resolutions, and assessment engineer's report, notices of public hearing and the right of majority protest may be waived in writing with the written consent of all of the owners of property within the territory to be annexed; and WHEREAS, notwithstanding that such provisions of the Act related to the annexation of territory to the District, Article XIII D of the Constitution of the State of California ("Article XIII D") establishes certain procedural requirements for the authorization to levy assessments which apply to the Ivy of annual assessments for the District on the territory proposed to be annexed to such District; and WHEREAS, the owners of certain property described in Exhibit A attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, have requested that such property (collectively, the "Territory") be annexed to the District in order to provide for the levy of annual assessments to finance the maintenance of certain improvements described in Exhibit B hereto -(the "Improvements"); and WHEREAS, all of the owners of the Territory have filed with. the City Clerk duly executed forms entitled "Consent And Waiver To Annexation Of Certain Real Property To A Maintenance District And Approval Of The Levy Of Assessments On Such Real Property" (the "Consent and Waiver"); and WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the Act to the annexation of the Territory to the District and have expressly consented to the annexation of the Territory to the District; and WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have also expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the Act and/or Article XIII D applicable to the authorization to levy the proposed annual assessment against the Territory set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference and have declared support for, consent to and approval of the authorization to levy such proposed annual assessment set forth in Exhibit C attached hereto; and TRACT 18032 P145 WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have also expressly agreed for themselves, their heirs, successors and assigns that: (1) The proportionate special benefit derived by each parcel in the Territory from the District Improvements has been determined in relationship to the entirety of the maintenance and operation expenses of the Improvements; (2) The proposed annual assessment does not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit from the Improvements conferred on each parcel in the Territory. (3) Only the special benefits derived or to be derived by each parcel in the Territory from the Improvements have been included in the proposed annual assessment. WHEREAS, at this time the City .Council desires to order the annexation of the Territory to the District and to authorize the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit C hereto. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are true and correct. SECTION 2: The City Council hereby finds and determines that: a. The annual assessments proposed to be levied on each parcel in the Territory do not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on each such parcel from the Improvements. b. The proportional special benefit derived by each parcel in the Territory from .the Improvements has been determined in relationship to the entirety of the cost of the maintenance of the Improvement. c. Only special benefits will be assessed on the Territory by the levy of the proposed annual assessments. SECTION 3: This legislative body hereby orders the annexation the Territory to the District, approves the financing of the maintenance of the Improvements from the proceeds of annual assessments to be levied against the Territory and approves and orders the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit C. SECTION 4: All future proceedings of the District, including the levy of all assessments, shall be applicable to the Territory. TRACT 18032 P146 Exhibit A Identification of the Owner and Description of the Property to be Annexed The Owner of the Property is: Meritage -Homes of California, Inc., a California corporation The legal, description of the Property is THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE NORTHEAST '/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 1 NORTH, RANGE 6 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN, IN THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO THE OFFICIAL PLAT THEREOF. EXCEPT THERE FROM A STRIP 20 FEET WIDE ALONG THE WEST SIDE THEREOF. ALSO EXCEPTING THERE FROM THAT PORTION CONVEYED TO THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, BY GRANT DEED RECORDED MAY 11, 1999 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 19990201923, OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. Assessor's Parcels Numbers of the Property: 0225-161-65 AND 0225-161-71 TRACT 18032 P147 Exhibit B Description of the District Improvements Fiscal Year 2010/2011 Street Light Maintenance District No. 7 (North Etiwanda) Street Light Maintenance District No. 7 (North Etiwanda) (the "Maintenance District") is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located on local streets in what is termed the North Etiwanda area of the City. Generally, this area encompasses the area of the City east of pay Creek Channel and north of Highland Avenue within the incorporated area of the City. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on local streets and traffic signals (or a portion thereof) on local streets within the North Etiwanda area. Proposed additions to the Improvements for Project TRACT 18032: STREET LIGHTS: 5 EACH EXISTING STREET LIGHTS: 3 EACH TRACT 18032 P148 Exhibit C Proposed Annual Assessment Fiscal Year 2010/2011 Street Light Maintenance District No. 7 (North Etiwanda): The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Street Light Maintenance District No. 7 (North Etiwanda) for TRACT 18032: Land Use Basis EDU Factor* Rate per EDU* Sin le Famil Unit 1.00 $33.32 Multi-Famil Unit 1.00 33.32 Commercial/ Industrial Acre 2.00 33.32 Vacant Acre 2.00 33.32 *EDU means Equivalent Dwelling Unit. The proposed annual assessment for the property described in Exhibit A is as follows: 23 Parcels x 1 EDU Factor x $33.32 Rate Per EDU = $ 766.36 Annual Assessment TRACT 18032 P149 RESOLUTION NO. ~~~' ~©~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (ARTERIAL STREETS) FOR TRACT 18032 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has previously formed a special maintenance district pursuant to the terms of the "Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California (the "Act", said special maintenance district known and designated as Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (Arterial Streets) (the "District"); and WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the Act authorize the annexatiori of additional territory to the District; and WHEREAS, such provisions also provide that the requirement for the preparation of resolutions, and assessment engineer's report, notices of public hearing and the right of majority protest may be waived in writing with the written consent of all of the owners of property within the territory to be annexed; and WHEREAS, notwithstanding that such provisions of the Act related to the annexation of territory to the District, Article XIII D of the Constitution of the State of California ("Article XIII D") establishes certain procedural requirements for the authorization to levy assessments which apply to the levy of annual assessments for the District on the territory proposed to be annexed to such District; and WHEREAS, the owners of certain property described in Exhibit A attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, have requested that such property (collectively, the "Territory") be annexed to the District in order to provide for~the levy of annual assessments to finance the maintenance of certain improvements described in Exhibit B hereto (the "Improvements"); and WHEREAS, all of the owners of the Territory have filed with the City Clerk duly executed forms entitled "Consent And Waiver To Annexation Of Certain Real Property To A Maintenance District And Approval Of The Levy Of Assessments On Such Real Property" (the "Consent and Waiver"); and WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the Act to the annexation of the Territory to the District and have expressly consented to the annexation of the Territory to the District; and. WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have also expressly waived any and .all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the Act and/or Article XIII D applicable to the authorization to levy the proposed annual assessment against the Territory set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference and have declared support for, consent to and approval of the authorization to levy such proposed annual assessment set forth in Exhibit C attached hereto; and P150 WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have also expressly agreed for themselves, their heirs, successors and assigns that: (1) The proportionate special benefit derived by each parcel in the Territory from the District Improvements has been determined in relationship to the entirety of the maintenance and operation expenses of the Improvements; (2) The proposed annual assessment does not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit from the Improvements conferred on each parcel in the Territory. (3) Only the special benefits derived or to be derived by each parcel in the Territory from the Improvements have been included in the proposed annual assessment. WHEREAS, at this time the City Council desires to order the annexation of the Territory to the District and to authorize the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit C hereto. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are true and correct. SECTION 2: The City Council hereby finds and determines that: a. The annual assessments proposed to be levied on each parcel in the Territory do not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on each such parcel from the Improvements. b. The proportional special benefit derived by each parcel in the Territory from the Improvements has been determined in relationship to the entirety of the cost of the maintenance of the Improvement. c. Only special benefits will be assessed on the Territory by the levy of the proposed annual assessments. SECTION 3: This legislative body hereby orders the annexation the Territory to the District, approves the financing of the maintenance of the Improvements from the proceeds of annual assessments to be levied against the Territory and approves and orders the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit C. SECTION 4: All future proceedings of the District, including the levy of all assessments, shall be applicable to the Territory. P151 Exhibit A Identification of the Owner and Description of the Property to be Annexed The Owner of the Property is: Heritage Homes of California, Inc., a California corporation The legal description of the Property is: THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 1 NORTH, RANGE 6 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN, IN THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO THE OFFICIAL PLAT THEREOF. EXCEPT THERE FROM A STRIP 20 FEET WIDE ALONG THE WEST SIDE THEREOF. ALSO EXCEPTING THERE FROM THAT PORTION CONVEYED TO THE STATE~OF CALIFORNIA, BY GRANT DEED RECORDED MAY 11, 1999 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 19990201923, OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. , Assessor's Parcels .Numbers of the Property: 0225-161-65 AND 0225-161-71 P152 Exhibit B Description of the District Improvements Fiscal Year 2011/2012 Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (Arterial Streets) Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (Arterial Streets) (the "Maintenance District") is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located on arterial streets throughout the City. These sites consist of several non-contiguous areas throughout the City. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on arterial streets and traffic signals on arterial streets within the rights-of-way or designated easements of streets dedicated to the City. Proposed additions to the Improvements for Project Tract 18032: EXISTING STREET LIGHTS: 3 EACH P153 Exhibit C Proposed Annual Assessment Fiscal Year 2010/2011 Street Light Maintenance District No.1 (Arterial Streets): The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Street Light Maintenance District No.1 (Arterial Streets) for Tract 18032: Land Use Basis EDU Factor* Rate per EDU* Sin le Famil Parcel 1.00 $17.77 Multi-Famil Parcel 1.00 17.77 Commercial Acre 2.00 17.77 Vacant Acre 2.00 17.77 *EDU means Equivalent Dwelling Unit. The proposed annual assessment for the property described in Exhibit A is as follows: 23 Parcels x 1 EDU Factor x $17.77 Rate Per EDU = $ 408.71 Annual Assessment s~~~ x~POx~r ENGINEERII~;G DEP_3RT~fENT ~~~~~ RANCHO Date: July 6, 2011 G'UCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager From: Mark A. Steuer, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer By: Fred Lyn, Utilities Division Manager ~~ Subject: APPROVE AND AUTHORIZE THE EXECUTION OF A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT IN THE AMOUNT OF $132,000.00 TO APPLIED METERING TECHNOLOGIES, INC., FOR INSTALLATION, CONFIGURATION AND METER READING SERVICES WITHIN THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL UTILITY SERVICE AREA FOR FY 2011/12 TO BE FUNDED FROM 17053035309 MUNICIPAL UTILITY FUND RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council approve and authorize the execution of a .sole source Professional Services Agreement in the amount of $132,000.00 to Applied Metering Technologies, Inc., (AMT) for the installation, configuration and meter reading services within the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility (RCMU) service area. This service shall be funded from Account 17053035309 Municipal Utility Fund, with no increase from the FY 2010/11 rate. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS On August 31, 2001, the Rancho Cucamonga City Council authorized the creation and operation of a municipally owned utility for the purpose of providing various utility services to the Victoria Arbors Master Plan Area. The Arbors Substation was constructed and became operational supplying permanent load on February 13, 2004. The backbone infrastructure was installed and the City began serving Victoria Gardens Regional Shopping Center as well as other developments within the Municipal Utility Service Area with permanent electric service. With the ongoing need to provide retail customers with accurate permanent metered electric service, staff found that Applied Metering Technologies, Inc. (AMT), is the only provider in the area qualified in all aspects of electric meter services. They are certified and used by each of the three Investor Owned Utilities. Staff has surveyed other local publicly owned electric utilities that use AMT and confirmed the rates provided are reasonable and comparable. It is recommended the City Council approve and authorize the execution of a sole source Professional Services Agreement for meter installation, configuration and meter reading services within the RCMU service area to be funded from Account 17053035309. Resp ^ ' mitted, ~r-----~---~ M er Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer MAS:FL/alrw P154 Attachment(s) P155 S'I'~F ~ZEP®l~'I' ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT Date: July 6, 2011 To: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager From: Mark A. Steuer, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer By: Fred Lyn, Utilities Division Manager ~~ _~ RANCHO C;UCAMONGA Subject: APPROVE AND AUTHORIZE THE EXECUTION OF A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT IN THE AMOUNT OF $131,000.00 TO BUTSKO UTILITY DESIGN, INC., FOR TECHNICAL ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING SUPPORT WITHIN THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL UTILITY SERVICE AREA FOR FY 2011/12 TO BE FUNDED FROM 17053035309 MUNICIPAL UTILITY FUND RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council approve and authorize the execution of a sole source Professional Services Agreement in the amount of $131,000.00 to Butsko Utility Design, Inc. (Butsko), for technical electrical engineering support within the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility (RCMU) service area to be funded from Account 17053035309 Municipal Utility Fund. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS On August 31, 2001, the Rancho Cucamonga City Council authorized the creation and operation of a municipally owned utility for the purpose of providing various utility services to the Victoria Arbors Master Plan Area. The Arbors Substation was constructed and became operational supplying permanent load on February 13, 2004. The backbone infrastructure was installed and the City began serving Victoria Gardens Regional Shopping Center as well as other developments within the Municipal Utility Service Area with permanent electric service. Butsko has been providing electrical engineering and design support for RCMU since 2001. As the designer of the distribution system, Butsko is uniquely qualified to provide inspection, design and planning services for these important and time-sensitive projects. They have unique prior experience and expertise and have the capability to provide any new service extension reasonably and quickly. Staff believes that the solicitation of any new firms for this. service would incur substantial cost. increases in retraining time/money and possible risk reliability to the RCMU electric system. Staff projected a budget for these services based upon the ariticipated number of hours of assistance that will be required for the fiscal year 2011/12. The proposed FY 2011/12 fees are an increase of three percent (3%) from the current fees, which have not been increased since FY 2009/10. However, the City will only~pay for a service actually rendered and is not committed to any minimum monthly charges from Butsko. It is recommended the City Council approve and authorize the execution of a sole source Professional Services Agreement for technical electrical engineering support within the RCMU service area to be funded from Account 17053035309. Respectful_ly~s~bmitted, ~~~~~~ R -, -.- M u$ Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer P156 S 1 ril' ~ ~~®~ 1 ENGINEERING DEP_-1RT~IENT Date: July 6, 2011 To: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager RANCHO C,UCAMONGA From: Mark A. Steuer, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer By: Fred Lyn, Utilities Division Manager ~~ Subject: APPROVE AND AUTHORIZE THE EXECUTION OF A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT IN THE AMOUNT OF $165,000.00. TO INTERNATIONAL LINE BUILDERS, INC., FOR OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF THE ARBORS SUBSTATION~AND THE MUNICIPAL UTILITIES ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM WITHIN THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL UTILITY SERVICE AREA FOR FY 2011/12 TO BE FUNDED FROM 17053035309 MUNICIPAL UTILITY FUND RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council approve and authorize the execution of a sole source Professional Services Agreement in the amount of $.165,000.00 to International Line Builders, Inc. (ILB), for operation and maintenance of the Arbors Substation and the municipal utilities electrical distribution system within the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility (RCMU) service area. This service shall be funded from Account 17053035309 Municipal Utility Fund, with no increase from the FY 2010/11 rate. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS On August 31, 2001, the Rancho Cucamonga City Council authorized the creation and operation of a municipally owned utility for the purpose of providing various utility services to the Victoria Arbors Master Plan Area. The Arbors Substation was constructed by ILB and became operational supplying permanent load on February 13, 2004. The backbone infrastructure was also installed by ILB and the City began serving Victoria Gardens Regional Shopping Center as well as other developments vvithin the Municipal Utility Service Area with permanent electric service. Staff identified that specialized operation and maintenance services would be required to continue providing reliable service to the RCMU service area. ILB is a full service, electrical distribution and transmission power line construction company with 30 years of experience in energy-related facility installation, repair and maintenance services nationwide. A benefit of continuing a contract with ILB is their staff is local and already extremely familiar with the electric infrastructure in Rancho Cucamonga. Given the complexity of the electric distribution infrastructure, the City would be ensuring it has the most knowledgeable contractors working on RCMU's system and will guarantee a timely and effective response to any disruption or outage, ensuring in public safety. Staff has surveyed other local publicly owned electric utilities that use ILB and confirmed the rates provided are reasonable and comparable. It is recommended the City Council approve and authorize the execution of a sole source Professional Services Agreement for operation and maintenance of the Arbors Substation and the municipal utilities electrical distribution system within the RCMU service area to be funded from Account 17053035309. Respe_ ubmitted, ~_ ~~/~'~': Mme- r Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer P157 STAFF REPORT ENGINEERING SERVICEti DEP_1R't\iENT DATE: July 6, 2011 TO: Mayor and Members of the~City Council Jack Lam, AICP; City Manager FROM: Mark A. Steuer, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer BY: Willie Valbuena, Assistant Engineer RANCHO ~,;UCAMONGA SUBJECT: RECOMMENDATION TO QUITCLAIM VEHICULAR ACCESS RIGHTS TO AND EGRESS FROM THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF LOT 1 OF TRACT 18710 ABUTTING CHURCH STREET, EAST OF MILLIKEN AVENUE RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council approve the quitclaim of vehicular access rights to and egress from the southerly line of Lot 1 of Tract 18710 abutting Church Street, east of Milliken Avenue. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Tentative Tract Map 18710, located on the north side of Church Street, east of Milliken Avenue, within the Medium-High Residential District (14-24 dwelling units per acre), was approved by the Planning Commission on January 14, 2009. This project is for a subdivision of 20.69 acres of land into two numbered lots (Lots 1 and 2) with 241 units for condominium purposes on' Lot 1. All rights of vehicular access to and egress from the southerly line of Lot 1 of Tract 18710 abutting Church Street was inadvertently dedicated to the City. The dedication of vehicular access rights means anyone requesting a new drive approach would have to apply for a quitclaim of those rights to the City Council. . The developer, Homecoming I at Terra Vista, LLC is requesting to process the quitclaim of said vehicular access rights so they can build a commercial drive approach opening for their main entrance on Church Street. On June 8, 2011, the Planning Commission determined that said quitclaim is consistent with the General Plan and recommended the quitclaim occur. Respectful) submitted, ~. _.. _ ...._ Mark A. Steuer Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer MAS/WAV:rIf P158 RESOLUTION NO. il'"rL~~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, FINDING THAT SAID VEHICULAR ACCESS RIGHTS MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED HEREIN TO BE UNNECESSARY AND RESTRICTIVE, AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE THAT CERTAIN DEED, A COPY OF WHICH IS ATTACHED HERETO AND TO CAUSE THE SAME TO BE RECORDED WHEREAS, the vehicular access restrictions governing Tract 18710, applicable to Lot 1 of said tract, were determined to be unnecessary and restrictive in nature; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga heretofore made the findings on June 8, 2011, that authorizing the quitclaim of vehicular access rights would be in conformity with the General Plan of the City of Rancho Cucamonga; and NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: SECTION 1: That the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby quitclaims the vehicular access restrictions on southerly line of Lot 1 of Tract 18710 abutting Church Street, east of Milliken Avenue, on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, which has been further described in a legal description which is attached hereto, and by reference made a part hereof. SECTION 2: That from and after the date of resolution is recorded, said vehicular access restriction is no longer constitute a public easement. SECTION 3: That the City Clerk shall cause a certified copy of this resolution to be recorded in the office of the County Recorded of San Bernardino County, California. SECTION 4: That the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of the resolution, and it shall thereupon take effect and be in force. SECTION 5: The City Engineer is hereby authorized and directed to execute the deed, a full, true and correct copy of which is attached hereto, and cause the same to be recorded forthwith upon adoption of this Resolution. J STAFF REPORT ., ~ ' ; j 'r~,~--~~.~ ENGINEERING SERVICES DEP.~RT:~IENT ~~ RANCHO C,UCAMONGA Date: July 6, 2011 To: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager From: Mark A. Steuer, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer By: Walter C. Stickney, Associate Engineer Shelley Hayes, Assistant Engineer Subject: ACCEPT THE PACIFIC ELECTRIC TRAIL PHASE 4 - GROVE AVENUE TO AMETHYST AVENUE, CONTRACT NO. 09-262 AS COMPLETE, RETAIN THE FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND AS A GUARANTEE BOND, RELEASE THE LABOR AND MATERIAL BOND, AND AUTHORIZE THE CITY ENGINEER TO FILE A NOTICE OF COMPLETION AND APPROVE THE FINAL CONTRACT AMOUNT OF $2,601,565.21 RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council accept the Pacific Electric Trail Phase 4 -Grove Avenue to Amethyst Avenue, Contract No. 09-262, as complete, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion, retain the Faithful Performance Bond in lieu of a Maintenance Bond, authorize the release of the Labor and Materials Bond in the amount of $2,335,350.59 six months after the recordation of said notice if no claims have been received and authorize the release of the retention in the amount of $260,156.52, 35 days after acceptance. Also, approve the final contract amount of $2,601,565.21. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The subject project has been completed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The Pacific Electric Trail Phase 4 -Grove Avenue to Amethyst Avenue improvements scope of work consisted of construction of concrete pedestrian/bicycle tail, decomposed granite jogging/equestrian trail, trail lighting, landscaping with irrigation, and traffic signals at intersections. Pertinent information of the project is as follows: Budgeted Amount: $6,000,000.00 Account Numbers: Engineer's Estimate City Council Approval to Advertise Publish dates for local paper: Bid Opening: 2660801-5650/1615660-0 and 1214303-5650/1544214-0 $5,613,983.00 May 6, 2009 May 12 and 19, 2009 July 14, 2009 P159 P160 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Re: Pacific Electric Trail Phase 4 -Grove Avenue to Amethyst Avenue July 6, 2011 Page 2 Contract Award Date Low Bidder: Contract Amount: 10% Contingency: Final Contract Amount: Difference in Contract Amount: August 5, 2009 Southwest Construction Company, Inc. $2,335,350.59 $467,070.12 $2,601,565.21 $266,214.62 (11.4%) The net increase in the total cost of the project is a result of forty-one (41) Contract Change Orders, including the balancing statement. ft's noted that most of the changes were requested by the City. The notable changes that were significant to the increase of the Contract amount were: remove five and pour five new light pole footings due to lowered grade, between Hellman Avenue ,and Base Line Road; add drinking fountain at the future rest area near the Rains House; additional pavement markings, legends and signs; additional PVC fencing; added a v-ditch to prevent slope erosion west of the Cucamonga Creek Channel; install lighting contactors and time clocks to turn lights off in daylight; additional cobble paving at Hellman Avenue and Base Line Road to improve aesthetics; weed abatement along trail; trim eucalyptus trees between Hellman Avenue and Vineyard Avenue; Rochester Avenue drainage modifications discovered after heavy rains; added ADA truncated domes at crossings; additional sidewalk at Carnelian Avenue for public safety; add chain link fence and gates due to existing railroad bridge removal; extra work at flood control ramp. due to grade change; battery backup systems for signals at Grove Avenue, Hellman Avenue and Base Line Road; and grading a concrete swale at Rochester Avenue to alleviate drainage issues. The balancing statement accounted for other minor increases and decreases in the project quantities. Respectfully submitted, i 'OM M i=k ~. teuer Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer MAS/WCS/SH:Is Attachment P161 ~1Nk DR f~.~ 5P ~ ' j ! HILLSIpE RD ILL IDE R i i N V EEC h y ILSO AV WI NAV LSO ~ a ~ 1 t G ~ w ¢ ~ --~ 6A~Y N 5T ~ \ G ~~ ~ ~ = w ° H ~ i 0 FW 121 Z 210 w ~ d J ~ V CTORf u ~l ~ ~ > BASE N B SELI • ~~~ ~ GHU H S C CHU CH S ~ ` t r '' F TH BL ~ > x w _ O RO d ~ j JERSEY BL ~ d ~ 8 H ST ~ ' ST ~ 6TH ST __ \ - ~H ST 4 k aTH s ° _ N PROJECT vicinity Map Pacific Electric Inland Empire Trail Phases 4a and 4b Grove Ave to As~~ethyst Ave P162 RESOLUTION NO. `~-/I A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PACIFIC ELECTRIC TRAIL PHASE 4 -GROVE AVENUE TO AMETHYST AVENUE, CONTRACT NO. 09-262 AND AUTHORIZING- THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the Pacific Electric Trail Phase 4 -Grove Avenue to Amethyst Avenue, Contract No. 09-262, has been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. NO~,N, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, hereby resolves that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. P163 ,, STAFF REPOR'T' ~ ~ j ENGINEERING SERVICES DEP.~RTn'IENT RANCHO Date: July 6, 2011 C'UCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager From: ~ Mark A. Steuer, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer By: Carlo Cambare, Engineering Technician Subject: RELEASE OF MAINTENANCE GUARANTEE CASH DEPOSIT FOR DRC2005-00327, LOCATED 8619 BAKER AVENUE, SUBMITTED BY CHINESE CHRISTIAN FAMILY CHURCH, INLAND VALLEY RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council authorize the City Clerk to release the Maintenance Guarantee Cash Deposit, for DRC2005-00327, located 8619 Baker Avenue, submitted by Chinese Christian Family Church, Inland Valley BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The required one-year maintenance period has ended and the street improvements remain free from defects in materials and workmanship. DEVELOPER Chinese Christian Family Church, Inland Valley 8619 Baker Avenue Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730-4243 Release: Maintenance Guarantee Cash Deposit Respectfully submitted, _.. %_ ~~. ~.~ ~' ar uer Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer MAS:CC/alrw CR#143189 $1,440.00 Attachment(s) P164 EXHIBIT ~- VICINITY MAP --~ .; ~ i ------~ LJ ,,-- - ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~~ , Ir ~ r 1 ' T ~ -- ---- - ---- ~~ -- ` - -----~ ~ ~ j d , ~ L[-~1~i-- C(~ 1 -~ -- ~ ---- -- -.: ~~ --r--- -- -- ~--- ---------f - I . ----- --~ ~ ----__._' ___ _~ --- ~ I i ~ ~ R -_. -~ ~-„-._ __ _ ~ . -T---'-- I -- , , _ n._ - . .._._~-. ~ ._ _ -~ = ~ [ ---- ---- ~._..J - -u ------ _ [ ___ __- .~ ---.. --- ~ .---- ~ -- --- - Q --~ -j ~ ------- ____ ~. _ ...-.._. \ --_ ~ ' _ ~T - ...-r ~ 1 I ! L ~ ~ ,~~, c:. ,~ . ------ ---- - ~----- r - !------ ---...-........ ~ ~ D RC ~ J~----i --_~..__-., G ~~ ~ 005-OO~T C~7 CCI ;_!~ ~ ! , --- ~ 1 - -- ------ ~-- - I r ..._ _.._ -.. -- t~ ,I ----- ~------ _ ~ i --- -_ ~1::~ C~~ [TJ ~[:Il ~=~1 C~7 CIS ~ C~_l _~-.------ -----.~ ,~ _ 1 I ___ _. .-_ -- ~ .-!- _ ~ _ ---- - ~ ~ ~ i ~ I L..._. _..-_.__._._f__.___.._.-_ I I City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Services Division ®RC2005-00327 d~ d~ !/ICINITY MAP (Not to Scale) P165 CUCAIv10NGA ~ ~ ~ t~ r°~ ~~~ ....~ DATE: {„~~~ ~~ ~ RECEIPT NO.: NAME: '~?~'' ~-31111 ~d'w~>r,~"' ~ ~ ~iYi ``i~1~4'! ~1 ~~/'II .l.,~t° ~t,,,,~ PROJECT NO.:,.,~.(`~,,..'` '°~,~`t ADDRESS: '~,,~ ~ ~~~~~~~~ ~- ~.~ , PREPARED BYQ r~ r'"~,.,1 PHONE: '~-.J ° ENGINEERING FEES: ~' ~~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGINEERING DIVISION OFFICIAL RECEIPT ~ANGHO Plan Check Map: Street: Storm Drain: Legal Description: Hydrology: Landscape: Misc.: Lot Line Adjustment: Improv. Agree. Ext..: Merger: Street Vacation: Printing: 1001-000-4570 Reapportionment: 1100-000-4901 AD (Copy to Assess Rev) Mailing Fee: 1001-205-5151 IN-LIEU FEES: Median Island Utility Undergrounding`1°$'8"~~0~? St.Light Energy Deposit -000-4808 Miscellaneous: Comments: -• Public Works Ihspection Fee: 100100-4510 _ Contract Bid Document O.verload/Wideload Permit Standard Drawings # 1001-000 `4570 Bid Packet # TRUSTS (Refundable):. Monumentation 1882-000-2312 St. Improvemerit Attach Est. 1882-000-2314 Constr. Permit 1882-000-2315 Maintenance Retention Basin 1882-000-2322 Public Works OT Inspect Dep. 1882-000-2319 Location Amount F".~ -"'~ ~..~- 1r WHITE: Finance YELLOW: Engineerir 1-City 2-RDA 1-City 2-RDA ~~~~~ ~~ ' N TOTAL: ~~~,.~, ;tourer .,. P166 ~~ C.e ~1NHiNN1N~t:.k,E~'ol~ii''4.~:1. _ _ _CIT,iyC~F F;RhI~:;Ht~ C~It:i%C1C+tJGA _____ i;ITY l''t~l.L ' iN:,>rN CIVIC:; CEHTEr C'F;IVE ', RA!dCHJ C~1C~I~NhiA. GA 91.1a''4~ 9Ci7--~+ti-~c;cc RECEIRT: CF;i43i83 I~ATE° E~E,r"©li1E~ C~SHIEk IU: C:;FN6NF~ Ti11F.: :tl:ir~:18 " I St I6',p~rG'~e~fyllt 5i!'i'~ ar :}GpG 1, ~4N. NN i 1~~9CNFi3 c~~1~~-. CI' I I Tii7AL r~II, _ -_______--- ~Y;,~NanN RECEIUEP FRt~~i: c ' THE CHIf~EfiE CHR.sL~TIAFa F(~hiL'i CHllF~ F:illdCntl Cll~t~MNh16H; CN ~i (3it i L'V 11Hlfiili~5ti!.(~~~IE,L'1.~:Si.~~.n i - I %J{;ii!~I ~~f~~;. irsi- i.:~1I..?Fi:)~,h{7'{~, 'i~.i,~ i":I j `i IJr i~`hir'~C:4if. CLis;~f'lC~dl.,'r ... ... -. nr~ r..~f;l C3i:1 P167 ,, STAFF REPORT ~- ENGINEERING SERVICES DEP.-1RTIt-LENT RANCHO Date: July 6, 2011 (;UCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager From: Mark A. Steuer, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer By: Carlo Cambare, Engineering Technician Subject: RELEASE OON TIHEESOUTHGSIDEAOFECHURCH STREIETOEASTA OF1 DAY&CREEK LOCATED BOULEVARD, SUBMITTED BY SHEA HOMES, LP RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council authorize the City Clerk to release the Maintenance Guarantee Cash Deposit, for Tract 17487 & 17840, located on the south side of Church Street, east of Day Creek Boulevard, submitted by Shea Homes, LP. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The required one-year maintenance period has ended and the street improvements remain free from defects in materials and workmanship. DEVELOPER Shea Homes, LP 1250 Corona Pointe Court, Suite 600 Corona, CA 92879 Release: Maintenance Guarantee Cash Deposit Respectfully submitted, ~~~~a r r` ~~` ~. M er Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer MAS:CC/alrw CR#143475 $20,040.00 Attachment(s) ~. ~~ ^. c' \/ e ; \~ ~ I. _ f c ~~ e ~ ____-I ~~ ` ^-, i ~Il! A Y 0 x A ~~ f -= .~ '~ ~ ~ , ,: :::~ r- }•i l.,_ P168 ~~ ~. v ~. o -;' o d Q ui ~ z . W . ~ s .. i . CD a " o~ . ~ ~ ~z oD. ~ ~ ~ ' . ~ nu ~~ ' rrnn~ ° V Q ~ ~ ~ ~ a r a U ~ ~ ~ ~~ v a U u ~ .. ~' , ~ r ~ + ~ ~ ~= rn F o ~ U W N. O Z ~~ Q ~ 'q ~~ ~ ti U $ _ ~, > a m a m m r CJ m rn m 1 - ~ c U C L - i • ° ~ 7 '[ 5 x ~ E o ~ u .~ U N C m b n U' ro c 0 ~~~~~ m ~ j ~a • • P169 STAFF REPORT ENGINEERING SERVICES DEP.-1RTMENT Date: July 6, 2011 To: Mayor and Members of the -City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager From: Mark A. Steuer, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer By: Carlo Cambare, Engineering Technician ~r RANCHO c,UCAMONGA Subject: ACCEPT IMPROVEMENTS, RELEASE THE FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE LETTER OF CREDIT, ACCEPT A MAINTENANCE CASH DEPOSIT AND FILE A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR IMPROVEMENTS FOR DRC2005-00831 LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF VINEYARD AVENUE AND SAN BERNARDINO ROAD , SUBMITTED BY MAPLETON INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL L.P. RECOMMENDATION The required improvements for DRC2005-00831 have been completed in an acceptable manner, and it is recommended that the City Council accept said improvements, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Letter of Credit and accept a Maintenance Cash Deposit. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS As a condition of approval of completion of DRC2005-00831, .located at the northeast corner of Vineyard Avenue and San Bernardino Road, the applicant was required to complete improvements. The improvements have been completed and it is recommended that the City Council release the existing Faithful Performance Letter of Credit and accept the Maintenance Cash Deposit. Developer: 115 Jensen Court Thousand Oaks, CA 91360 Release: Letter of Credit # 643780 (letter of credit No.) Accept: Maintenance Cash Deposit # CR155492 (Receipt No.) Respectfully submitted, f~t-ar #euer Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer MAS:CC/alrw $112,000.00 $11,200.00 Attachment(s) i ~ P170 ,f~ F ~., r City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Division Vicinity Map N W ~ E S Item : ~~~' ~rl/1_g'' ~D~.~/ Title: I//C'//1/l //~!~ P171 •t._ c.l .... ..... • CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGINEERING . DIVISION OFFICIAL RECEIPT RANCHO ~ ..''i C.+ l/ / DATE: ~f Iy; ~ ICJ RECEIPT NO.: f , NAME: ~~S }{Owt~ 1'~lJt~nt~- 1 , i~ta PROJECT NO.: '~(~- ~'')1.("~r1 " E~ 5~"t"~ ADDRESS: ~yJp~' ~. ~Ait~~ c~fi~-~- ~~~ y~ .~`~ PREPAREb BY: L.f~'~-~- ~ C' Scvt~~l~t,~ , r~ ~ ~2 S~i'~ PHONE: •ur~) ~~~. t~aao ENGINEERING FEES: Plan Check Public Works Inspection Fie: Map: 100100-4510 Street: Contract Bid Document Storm Drain: Overload/Wideload Permit Legal Description: Standard Drawings # Hydrology: 1001-000-4570 .Landscape: ~ , Bid Packet # r ~ Misc.: 1-City 2-RDA Lot Lira Adjustment: Improv. Agree,>Ext.: d& ' 1-City 2-RDA ' ee Merger: ~< TRUSTS (Refundable): Street Vacation: Printing: Monumentation 188-000-2312 ,~, 1001-000-4570 St. Improvement Attach Est. 0 r ~~ '~ ~'~ Reapportionment: 1882-000-2314 ~ 1100-000-4901 ~ Constr. Permit 1:882-000-2315 AD (Copy to Assess Rev) Maintenance Retention Basin Mailing Fee: 1882-000-2322 1001-205-5151 Public Works OT Inspect Dep. 1882-000-2319 TOTAL : ,,_ 2-~ C%4O, O° IN=LIEU FEES Median Islalnd Utility Undergrounding St.Light Eneray Deposit -000-4808 Miscellaneous: Comments: ~AI+J~~N ~ WHITE: Finance YELLOW: Engineering i c fl Location Amount ~~ h~+~~ PINK: Customer P172 RESOLUTION NO. ~/~I A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR DRC2005-00831 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for DRC2005-00831 have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work is complete. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. STAFF REPORT PL~~NNING DEPr1R11V1ENT RANCHO Date: July 6, 2011 C;UCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council From: James R. Troyer, AICP, Planning Director By: Mayuko Nakajima, Assistant Planner Subject: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND MUNICIPAL CODE AMENDMENT DRC2008- 00158 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A proposed amendment to the Historic Preservation Ordinance deleting Chapter 2.24, Title 2 of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code and replacing it in its entirety. Staff has prepared a Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council approve the second reading of Ordinance No. 848 as acted upon by the City Council at a public hearing at the June 15, 2011 meeting, thereby approving text changes to Chapter 2.24 (Historic Preservation). BACKGROUND: On June 15, 2011, staff provided an oral presentation at a public hearing to the City Council detailing the contents of Ordinance No. 847, deleting Chapter 2.24, Title 2 of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code and replacing it in its entirety. The purpose of the Ordinance is to meet the preservation goals and objectives of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and State and Federal standards. The Ordinance has been drafted to be consistent with the goals and policies of the General Plan, adopted in May 2010. The City Council approved the proposed Ordinance after the first reading on June 15, 2011. Respectfully submitted; Ja s R. royer, AICP Planning Director P173 JRT:MN\Is P174 ORDINANCE NO. 848 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF ,RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING MUNICIPAL CODE AMENDMENT DRC2008-00158, A REQUEST TO DELETE CHAPTER 2.24, TITLE 2 OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE AND REPLACE IT IN ITS ENTIRETY, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF A. Recitals. 1. The City of Rancho Cucamonga filed an application for Municipal Code Amendment No. DRC2008-00158, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Municipal Code Amendment is referred to as "the application." 1. On April 25, 2007, the Historic Preservation Commission approved a request to initiate a Municipal Code Amendment. 2. On May 25, 2011, the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing with respect to the above referenced amendment and, following the conclusion thereof, adopted its Resolution No. _ 11-04, recommending that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopt said amendment. 3. On June 15, 2011, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the amendment. 4. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred. B. Ordinance. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does ordain as follows: SECTION 1: This City Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Ordinance are true and correct. SECTION 2: Based upon substantial evidence presented to the City Council during the above-referenced public hearing on June 15, 2011, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, the City Council hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to property located within the City; and b. The proposed amendment will not have a significant impact on the environment; and c. This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and is in conformance with the General Plan; and d. This amendment does promote the goals and objectives of the Development Code by implementing the policies of the. General Plan, protecting the stability of land uses, and attaining the advantages resulting from comprehensive and orderly land use and resource planning; and P175 e. The proposed amendment will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; and f. The Planning Department staff has prepared an Initial Study pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). As indicated on the attached Initial Study, there is no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant affect on the environment; thus, a Negative Declaration has been prepared and circulated to specific agencies and interested parties as well as a public hearing notice. The Historic Preservation Commission has .reviewed the Planning Department's determination of exemption, and based on its own independent judgment, concurs in the staff's determination of exemption. SECTION 3: Chapter 2.24 (Historic Preservation) of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code is hereby amended to read, in words and figures, as shown on Attachment A: SECTION 4: If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or word of this Ordinance is, for any reason, deemed or held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, or preempted by legislative enactment, such decision or legislation shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City Council of the City of Rancho ,Cucamonga hereby declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or words thereof, regardless of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, clauses, phrases, or words might subsequently be declared invalid or unconstitutional or preempted by subsequent legislation. SECTION 5: The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be published within 15 days after its passage at least once in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. Please see the following page for formal adoption, certification and signatures Ordinance No. 848 -Page 2 of 20 P176 PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 6th day of July 2011. L. Dennis Michael, Mayor ATTEST: Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk I, JANICE C. REYNOLDS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance was introduced at a Regular Meeting of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the 15th day of June 2011, and was passed at a Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the 6th day of July 2011. Executed this 7th day of July 2011, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk Ordinance No. 848 -Page 3 of 20 P177 ATTACHMENT A Chapter HISTORIC PRESERVATION 2.24.010 Purpose. 2.24 It is found that the protection, enhancement, perpetuation, and use of districts, sites, and structures of historic, cultural, and architectural significance, located within the City of Rancho Cucamonga are of aesthetic and economic value to the City. It is further found that cultural and Historic Resources contribute to the City's character, atmosphere, and reputation, and that respecting the heritage of the City will enhance its economic, cultural, and aesthetic standing. Therefore, it is imperative that the City safeguards these irreplaceable resources for the welfare, enjoyment, and education of the present and future community. The purpose of this Chapter is to: A. Provide a mechanism to identify, designate, protect, preserve, enhance, and perpetuate those historic sites, structures, and objects that embody and reflect the City's aesthetic, cultural, architectural, and historic heritage; B. Foster civic pride in the beauty and accomplishments represented by the City's Historic Landmarks and distinctive neighborhoods and recognize these resources as economic assets; C. Encourage the protection, enhancement, appreciation, and use of structures of historical, cultural, architectural, community, or aesthetic value that have not been designated as historical resources but are deserving of recognition; D. Enhance the quality of life and promote future economic development within the City by stabilizing and improving the aesthetic and economic value of such districts, sites, structures, and objects; E. Encourage adaptive reuse of the City's Historic Resources by promoting public awareness of the value of rehabilitation, restoration, and maintenance of existing buildings as a means to conserve reusable material and energy resources; F. Integrate historic preservation within the City's comprehensive development plan; G. Promote and encourage historic preservation through continued private ownership and utilization of such sites, buildings, and other structures now so owned and used, to the extent that the objectives listed above can be attained under such policy. 2.24.020 Definitions. The following terms when used in this Chapter shall have the meaning set forth in this Section, unless a different meaning clearly appears from the context: "Alteration" means any act or process that modifies a Historic Landmark or Contributing Resource that either: (1) requires a building permit and changes one or more of the features of a landscape or structure including, without limitation, the erection, construction, reconstruction, or relocation of any structure or any part of a structure; or (2) significantly changes any feature of a landscape or exterior of a structure that relates to its status as a Historic Landmark or Contributing Resource, regardless of whether such act or process requires a building permit. Ordinance No. 848 -Page 4 of 20 P178 "Building and Safety Official" means the Building and Safety Official of the City of Rancho Cucamonga or his or her designee. "Commission" means the City of Rancho Cucamonga Historic Preservation Commission. "Conservation District" means an area of the City designated as a Conservation District pursuant to this Chapter. "Contributing Resource" means any site, sign, structure, building, landscape, object, area, place, or feature within a Conservation District that is either a separately designated Historic Landmark or designated as a resource that contributes to the district's historic, cultural, or architectural significance. "Council" means the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. "Demolition" means any act or process that destroys, in whole or in part, a building, structure, or site or permanently impairs its structural integrity. "Historic Landmark" means any structure any site, sign, structure, building, landscape, object, area, place, or feature designated as a Historic Landmark pursuant to this Chapter. "Inventory of Historic Resources" means the inventory adopted by the Commission of potentially historic sites, structures, buildings, landscapes, areas, and places in the City. "Ordinary maintenance and repair" means any work for which a building permit is not required by law the purpose and effect of which is to correct any deterioration of or damage to an improvement or natural feature or any part thereof and to restore the same to its condition prior to the occurrence of such deterioration or damage. "Planning Director" means the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga or his or her designee. "Point of Historic Interest" means a location designated as a Point of Historic Interest pursuant to this Chapter. "Register of Historic Resources" means the inventory adopted by the Commission of Historic Landmarks, Points of Historic Interest, and Conservation Districts designated pursuant to this Chapter. "Rehabilitation" means the act or process of making possible a compatible use for a property through repair, alterations, and additions while preserving those portions or features which convey its historical, cultural, or architectural significance. "Restoration" means the act or process of accurately depicting the form, features, and character of a property as it appeared at a particular period of time by means of the removal of features from other periods in its history and reconstruction of missing features from the restoration period, which may include the limited and sensitive upgrade of mechanical, electrical, and plumbing systems and other code-required work to make the property functional. "Secretary's Standards" means the Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties adopted by the United States Secretary of the Interior, and all guidelines adopted for the implementation of the same. Ordinance No. 848 -Page 5 of 20 P179 "Small Business" means any office-type use that does not exceed 2,500 square feet, with no more than 5 employees. "State Historical Building Code" means California Health & Safety Code, Section 18950 et seq. and the California Historical Building Code, codified at Part 8, Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations, as either of these may be amended from time to time. 2.24.030 Historic Preservation Commission. A. There is created the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. B. Powers and Duties: The Commission shall have the following powers and duties in addition to any other duties specified in this Chapter: 1. Administer the provisions of this Chapter. 2. Advise the Council in all matters pertaining to historic preservation. 3. Maintain a current register of designated Historic Resources for public use and information. 4. Maintain a current inventory of potentially Historic Resources for public use and information. 5. Recommend the designation of historical resources, as hereinafter provided by this Chapter. 6. Review and hold public hearings on applications for Certificates of Appropriateness, as hereinafter provided. 7. Review and comment on the decisions and documents, including but not limited to environmental assessments, Environmental Impact Reports, and Environmental Impact Statements, prepared by other public agencies when such decisions or documents might affect designated or potential historical resources within the City. 8. Participate in, promote, and conduct public informational, educational, and interpretive programs pertaining to historical resources. 9. Recommend and encourage the protection, enhancement, appreciation, and use of structures of historical, cultural, architectural, community or aesthetic value that have not been designated as historical resources but are deserving of recognition. 10. Consider requests by property owners for non-technical advice on proposed work on historical landmarks and Contributing Resources. 11. Perform any other functions that may be designated by resolution or action of the Council. C. Membership -Appointment and Terms. The Commission shall consist of 5 voting members who shall each be residents of the City and appointed by the Council. Ordinance No. 848 -Page 6 of 20 P180 1. Each member shall serve a term of 4 years, except that two (2) of the members first appointed shall be designated to serve a term of 2 years, and three (3) of the members for a term of four (4) years, so as to provide a continuity of membership on the Commission. Thereafter, the term for each voting member shall be 4 years. An appointment to fill an unexpired term shall be for the remainder of such unexpired term. Three members of the Commission shall constitute a quorum. 2. Commission members shall be appointed to terms commencing on the first day of January next succeeding each regular municipal election scheduled to occur in November of even-number years. D. Chairperson and Vice-Chairperson -Appointment and Term. The Mayor, with the approval of the Council, shall appoint the first chairperson from among the members of the Commission. The term of office of the chairperson shall be for the calendar year or that portion remaining after the chairperson is appointed or elected. Thereafter, when there is a vacancy in . the office of the Chairperson, the Commission shall elect a Chairperson and Vice-Chairperson each year in the month of July from among its members. The same individual shall not hold the position of Chairman for more than three years in a row. E. Assignment of Duties by Council: 1. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Chapter, the Council may, by resolution, designate the Planning Commission as the Historic Preservation Commission and vest all functions, rights, powers, and duties of the Historic Preservation Commission in the Planning Commission. In the event the Council so designates the Planning Commission, the membership, terms of office and officers of the Historic Preservation Commission shall be the same as that set forth for the Planning Commission. 2. If, on the effective date of this Section, the Planning Commission is then acting as the Historic Preservation Commission pursuant to the Council's previous designation, such designation shall continue in effect and the Planning Commission shall continue to act as the Historic Preservation Commission subject to the requirements and terms of this Chapter. F. Secretary: The Planning Director shall act as Secretary to the Commission and shall be custodian of its records, conduct official correspondence, and generally coordinate the clerical and technical work of the Commission in administering this Chapter. 2.24.040 Designation of Historic Landmarks, Points of Historic Interest, and Conservation Districts. A. Automatic Designation. Any property within the City that is listed in the National Register of Historic Places or the California Register of Historic Resources is automatically designated as a Landmark for purposes of this Chapter. B. Prior Designations. Any Historic Landmark or Point of Historic Interest previously designated as such by the City on or before the effective date of this Chapter shall continue to be a Historic Landmark or Point of Historic Interest as previously designated for purposes of this Chapter and shall be subject to all provisions herein. C. New Designations. The Council may designate any structure, property, or properties as a Historic Landmark, Point of Historic Interest, or Contributing Resource subject to the criteria and procedures set forth in this Chapter. Ordinance No. 848 -Page 7 of 20 P181 D. Amendment or Rescission. The Council may amend or rescind the designation of any Historic Landmark, Point of Historic Interest, Historic District, or Conservation District for purposes of this Chapter, subject to the same procedures required for their designation, including without limitation hearing and recommendation of the Commission. 2.24.050 Designation Criteria for Historic Landmarks. A. The Council may designate a property as a Historic Landmark if it meets the requirements of both paragraphs B and C of this Section. B. Historic Landmarks must meet at least one of the following criteria: 1. It is or was once associated with events that made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of local or regional history or the cultural heritage of California or the United States. 2. It is or was once associated with persons important to local, California, or national history. 3. It embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, or method of construction. 4. It represents the .work of a master, possesses high artistic values, or represents a significant and distinguishable entity whose components may lack individual distinction. 5. It has yielded or has the potential to yield information important to the prehistory or history of the local area, California, or the nation. C. Historic Landmarks must retain integrity from their period of significance with respect to its location, design, setting, materials, workmanship, feeling, association, or any combination of these factors. A proposed landmark need not retain all such original aspects, but must retain sufficient integrity to convey its historic, cultural, or architectural significance. Neither the deferred maintenance of a proposed landmark nor its dilapidated condition shall, on its own, be equated with a loss of integrity. Integrity shall be judged with reference to the particular characteristics that support the property's eligibility. 2.24.060 Designation Criteria for Points of Historic Interest. A. The Council may designate a property as a Point of Historic Interest, if it meets the requirements applicable to Historic Landmarks under paragraph B of Section 2.24.050. Points of Historic Interest shall not be required to retain integrity from their periods of significance. B. Designated Points of Historic Interest shall not be subject to the same restrictions applicable to designated Historic Landmarks and Contributing Resources. C. Nothing in this Section shall be construed as limiting or foreclosing analysis of the impacts of a proposed project on a Point of Historic Interest under the California Environmental Quality Act. D. The Commission shall maintain a current register of Points of Historic Interest for public use and information. Ordinance No. 848 -Page 8 of 20 P182 2.24.070 Designation Criteria for Historic Districts and Conservation Districts. A. The Council may designate a property or collection of properties as a Historic District if the proposed district meets the requirements of both paragraphs B and C of this paragraph Section. B. Historic Districts must meet at least one of the following criteria: 1. It has an identifiable, clear, and distinct boundary that possesses a significant concentration of structures sharing common historical, visual, aesthetical, cultural, archaeological, or architectural plan or physical development; or 2. It demonstrates character, interest, or value as part of the development, heritage, or cultural characteristics of the community, state, or country; or 3. It is the site of a significant local, state, or national event; or 4. It is associated with the lives of persons important to local, state, or national history; or 5. It is identifiable as the work of a master builder, designer, architect, artist, or landscape architect whose individual work has influenced the development of the community, county, state, or country. C. Historic Districts must retain integrity from their period of significance with respect to its location, design, setting, materials, workmanship, feeling, and association. Not all properties or structures in a proposed district need to retain all such original aspects, but a substantial number of such properties and structures must retain sufficient integrity to convey the historic, cultural, or architectural significance of the district. Neither deferred maintenance within a proposed district nor the dilapidated condition of its constituent buildings and landscapes shall, on its own, be equated with a loss of integrity. Integrity shall be judged with reference to the particular characteristics that support the district's eligibility. D. Conservation Districts: The Council may designate a property or collection of properties that do not qualify as a Historic District as a Conservation District if the proposed district has either: 1. A distinctive, cohesive, and identifiable setting, character, or association that make it unique and an integral part of the City's identity; or 2. A recognized neighborhood identity and a definable physical character and either high artistic value or a relationship to urban centers or Historic Districts that makes conservation of the proposed Conservation District essential to the. City's history or function. 2.24.080 Owner Consent. Owner consent is not required for a structure or property to be designated as a Point of Historic Interest, Historic Landmark, or a Contributing Resource. However, a structure or property cannot be designated as either a Historic Landmark or a Contributing Resource over the owner's objection unless the Council makes all of the following findings: A. The structure or property is on the City's historical inventory; Ordinance No. 848 -Page 9 of 20 P 183 B. The structure or property possesses exceptional architectural, historical, aesthetic, or cultural qualities; C. Designation will preserve or protect the exceptional qualities of the structure or property. 2.24.090 Designation Procedures - Historic Landmarks and Points of Historic Interest. A. Application. The City Council, Historic Preservation Commission, Planning Director, or the owners of the subject property or their authorized agents may apply for a Historic Landmark or Point of Historic Interest designation. A third party who believes that a property or structure should be designated may submit a written request for the Commission to initiate an application. In the event the Council or Commission initiates the application, the Planning Director shall complete the required application. All applications shall be made on a form prescribed by the Planning Director and shall include the following data: The assessor's parcel number and legal description of site; 2. A description of the Historic Landmark or Point of Historic Interest; including its current condition and its special aesthetic, cultural, architectural, or engineering interest, or value of a historic nature; 3. Sketches, drawings, photographs, or other descriptive material; 4. The signature of the property owner or the authorized agents. (See also Section 2.24.080: Owner Consent); 5. Such other information as requested by the Planning Director. B. Except as necessary to correct. an unsafe or dangerous condition pursuant to Section 2.24.190, it shall be unlawful for any person to carry out or cause to be carried out any activity requiring a Certificate of Appropriateness on a proposed Historic Landmark for which an application has been filed until the Council has taken final action denying the application. C. Survey. Within 45 days of when a designation application is deemed complete, the Planning Director shall conduct a survey to document all potentially historic features of the subject property and prepare a report to the Commission. D. Commission Review and Recommendation. The Commission shall conduct a public hearing on the application. After the close of the public hearing, the Commission shall adopt a resolution recommending to the Council the approval, conditional approval, or denial of the application. E. Council Determination. After receiving the Commission's recommendation, the Council shall conduct a public hearing on the application; excepting that an application for the designation of a Point of Historic Interest may be approved via the consent calendar without public hearing. The Council shall adopt a resolution approving, conditionally approving, or denying the application. If the Council has not taken action on the application within 180 days of the Commission's recommendation, then the application shall be deemed denied. F. The Planning Director shall forward a copy of the resolution approving the designation of a Historic Landmark or Point of Historic Interest to any department or agency that the Planning Director deems appropriate. Ordinance No. 848 -Page 10 of 20 P184 G. Upon designation by the Council, the Planning Director shall record the location, characteristics, and significance of the Historic Landmark or Point of Historic Interest on a California Department of Parks and Recreation Historic Resources Inventory Form 523, and include therewith a description of the particular features that are to be preserved and the legal description of the Historic Resource. H. A designated Historic Landmark or Point of Historic Interest may be identified by an approved City marker, but such a marker is not required. 2.24.100 Designation Procedures -Historic Districts and Conservation Districts. A. Procedures for the application and designation of Historic Districts and Conservation Districts shall be the same as those applicable to Historic Landmarks and Points of Historic Interest except as modified by this section. B. Applications: In addition to all other information and materials required by Section 2.27.090(A), all applications for designation of Historic Districts and Conservation Districts shall include the following: 1. A petition in support of the application that is signed by at least 51 percent of the owners of the properties within the proposed district. For purposes of the petition requirement, only one signature shall be allowed per parcel. 2. A depiction of the district that includes a clear and distinct description of its boundaries and an inventory of all contributing and non=Contributing Resources within the district. 3. A proposed conservation plan to regulate the manner in which the preservation objectives of the district will be attained. C. Except as necessary to correct an unsafe or dangerous condition pursuant to Section 2.24.190, it shall be unlawful for any person to carry out or cause to be carried out any activity requiring a Certificate of Appropriateness for any property within the boundaries of a proposed historic or Conservation District for which an application is pending. D. Whenever the Council designates a Historic District or Conservation District, it shall also adopt: (1) a written description and clear depiction of the district boundaries; (2) an inventory that identifies and describes Contributing Resources for the district; and (3) a conservation plan to regulate the manner in which the preservation objectives of the district will be attained. 2.24.110 Maintenance of Historic Landmarks and Contributing Resources. A. The owner, occupant, or other person having legal custody and control of a Historic Landmark or Contributing Resource shall keep in good repair all exterior portions thereof, all interior portions thereof regulated by the applicable designation statement or adopted conservation plan, and all interior portions thereof whose maintenance is necessary to prevent deterioration and decay of any exterior architectural feature. B. The owner, occupant or other person having legal custody and control of a Historic Landmark or Contributing Resource shall promptly repair such building or structure consistent with all other applicable local, State, and Federal laws, if it is found to have any of the following-defects as determined by the Building and Safety Official: Ordinance No. 848 -Page 11 of 20 P185 1. Building elements in danger of falling and injuring persons or property. 2. Deteriorated or inadequate foundation. 3. Defective or deteriorated flooring. 4. Walls, partitions, or other vertical supports that split, lean, list, buckle, or are otherwise failing due to defective material or deterioration. 5. Ceilings, roofs, roof supports, or other horizontal members that sag, split, buckle, or are otherwise failing due to defective materials or deterioration. 6. Fireplaces or chimneys that list, bulge, settle, or are otherwise failing due to defective material or deterioration. 7. Deteriorated, crumbling or loose exterior plaster. 8. Deteriorated or ineffective waterproofing of exterior walls, roofs, foundations or floors; including, but not limited to broken windows or doors. 9. Defective or insufficient weather protection for exterior wall coverings, including lack of paint, or weathering due to lack of paint or other protective covering. 10. Any fault, defect, or deterioration in the building that renders it structurally unsafe or insufficiently watertight. C. A Certificate of Appropriateness shall not be issued for the demolition of a Historic Landmark or a Contributing Resource because of the failure of the owner to comply with the provisions of this section. 2.24.120 Commission Advisory Function. The Commission may, upon request of the property owner, render non-technical advice on proposed work on a Historic Landmark or to a Contributing Resource. In rendering such advice and guidance, the Commission shall be guided by the purposes and criteria in this Chapter. This Section shall not be construed to impose any regulation or controls upon any property. 2.24.130 Certificates of Appropriateness -Requirement. A. No person shall carry out or cause to be carried out any alteration, restoration, rehabilitation, construction, removal, relocation, or demolition of any Historic Landmark or Contributing Resource unless the City has first issued a Certificate of Appropriateness in accordance with the requirements of this Chapter. B. Exceptions. A Certificate of Appropriateness shall not be required for any of the following actions. 1. Ordinary maintenance or repair of any exterior architectural feature that does not involve a change in design, material, or external appearance of a Historic Landmark or Contributing Resource. Ordinance No. 848 - Paae 12 of 20 P186 2. Alterations previously identified in an adopted conservation plan for a Historic District or Conservation District and designated in such conservation plan for review through the design review procedures set forth in Section 17.06.010 of the Development Code and approved accordingly. ° 3. Alterations that comply with the State Historical Building Code. 4. Alterations or actions for which a Certificate of Economic Hardship has been approved. 2.24.140 Certificate of Appropriateness -Procedures. A. Application. An application for a Certificate of Appropriateness shall be filed with the Planning Department upon the prescribed form and shall contain the following data: 1. A description of the proposed work and an explanation of how it is compatible with the historical nature of the resource. 2. Plans describing the size, height, and appearance of the proposed work. 3. A site plan showing all existing buildings and structures and the relationship of the proposed work to the surrounding environment. 4. Relationship to the existing scale, massing, architectural style, site and streetscape, landscaping and signage, for new construction in Historic Districts. 5. If the application is for demolition, an explanation why the demolition is necessary and an economic feasibility report. 6. Other information. deemed necessary by the Planning Director. B. Commission Review. The Commission shall conduct a public hearing on the application, after which it shall adopt a resolution approving, conditionally approving, or denying the application. C. Planning Director Review. Notwithstanding the previous paragraph, the Planning Director shall review, and after conducting a public hearing, shall deny, approve, or conditionally approve any application for a Certificate of Appropriateness for any of the following types of alterations: 1. Repair or replacement of deteriorated materials with applications or materials of the same kind, type, and texture already in use for roofs, windows, siding material, chimneys and fireplaces, accessory structures, or fencing. 2. Addition or deletion of awnings, shutters, canopies, and similar incidental appurtenances. D. Upon approval, copies of the Certificate of Appropriateness shall be forwarded to the applicant, the Building and Safety Official, the Planning Director, and any other department or agency that requests one. E. No Certificate of Appropriateness shall become effective until the time to appeal its approval has expired. Ordinance No. 848 - Paae 13 of 20 P187 2.24.150 Certificate of Appropriateness -Findings. A. Standard Findings. A Certificate of Appropriateness shall not be approved unless the Commission or Planning Director, as appropriate, makes all of the following findings: 1. The project will not cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an Historic Resource within the meaning of the California Environmental Quality Act. 2. The project is consistent with the purposes of this Chapter. 3. The project is consistent with the Secretary's Standards. B. Additional Findings for Demolitions: In the case of a Certificate of Appropriateness to allow demolition of part or all of a Historic Landmark or Contributing Resource, all of the following additional findings must be made. 1. All efforts to restore, rehabilitate, or relocate the resource have been exhausted. 2. Restoration or rehabilitation would require extensive alterations that would render the resource unworthy of preservation. 3. Failure to demolish the resource would adversely affect or detract from the character of the neighborhood. C. Unsafe or 'Dangerous Conditions. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Section, an application for a Certificate of Appropriateness may be approved if the Commission finds. the project is necessary to correct an unsafe or dangerous condition on the subject property that was not caused by a failure to maintain the property as required by this Chapter. 2.24.160 Certificate of Economic Hardship. A. The Commission may issue a Certificate of Economic Hardship to allow alteration or demolition of a Historic Landmark or Contributing Resource where denial of a Certificate of Appropriateness would create an undue hardship upon the owner. B. Applications. An application for a Certificate of Economic Hardship shall be made on the prescribed form and shall be accompanied by all of the following information if requested by the Planning Director: 1. The estimated market value of the property in its current condition. . 2. The estimated market value of the property after completion of the proposed alteration or demolition. 3. Estimates of the costs of proposed alteration or demolition. 4. In the case of demolition, the estimated market value of the property after renovation of the existing property for continued use and an estimate from an architect, developer, real estate consultant, appraiser, or other real estate professional with experience in rehabilitation as to the economic feasibility of rehabilitation or reuse of the existing structure on the property. Ordinance No. 848 - Paae 14 of 20 P188 5. A rehabilitation report from a licensed structural engineer or architect with expertise in rehabilitation as to the structural soundness of any structures on the property and their suitability for rehabilitation. 6. For income-producing properties, information on annual gross income, operating and maintenance expenses, tax deductions for depreciation, and annual cash flow after debt service, current property value appraisals, assessed property valuations, and real estate taxes. 7. Remaining balance on any mortgage or other financing secured by the property and annual debt service, if any, for the previous two (2) years. 8. All appraisals obtained within the previous two (2) years by the owner or applicant in connection with the purchase, financing, or ownership of the property. 9. The amount paid for the property if purchased within the previous thirty six (36) months, the date of purchase, and the party from whom purchased, including a description of the relationship, if any, between the owner of record or applicant and the person from whom the property was purchased, and any terms of financing between the seller and buyer. 10. Any listing of the property for sale, rent, prices asked, and offers received, if any within the previous two (2) years. 11. Any other information the Planning Director may reasonably require to determine whether or not the property does or may yield a reasonable return to the owners. C. The Commission shall hold a public hearing on all applications for a Certificate of Economic Hardship; after which it may approve, conditionally approve, or deny the application. Such hearing may be held concurrently with any related application fora Certificate of Appropriateness. D. The Commission shall not approve any Certificate of Economic Hardship unless it makes all of the following findings: 1. Denial of the application would decrease the value of the subject property so as to leave no substantial value. 2. Sale or rental of the property is not financially feasible, when looking at the cost of holding such property for uses permitted in this zone. 3. Adaptive reuse of the property for lawful purposes is prohibited or impractical. 4. Denial of the application would damage the owner of the property unreasonably in comparison to the benefit conferred on the community. E. Upon approval, copies of the Certificate of Economic Hardship shall be forwarded to the applicant, the Building and Safety Official, the Planning Director, and any other department or agency that requests one. F. No Certificate of Economic Hardship shall become effective until the time to appeal its approval has expired. Ordinance No. 848 - Paae 15 of 20 P189 2.24.170 Mitigation/Conditions of Approval. Whenever any decision under this Chapter by the Council, Commission, or Planning Director to approve an application has the potential to diminish or destroy the historic, cultural, or architectural value of a Historic Landmark or Contributing Resource, the Commission or Planning Director may impose conditions to mitigate the loss of a Historic Landmark or Contributing Resource. Such conditions may include, but not be limited to the following: A. Documentation of the historic features of the property including, but not limited to, site plans, floor plans, elevations, detailed drawings of character defining features, photographic records of the exterior, interior, and any character defining features, title deed of the original owners, any historical information of person and events associated with the site. B. Requiring salvage, relocation, donation, or adaptive reuse of significant items or features within or on the property. 2.24.180 Demolition of Potential Historic Resources. A. No permit for the demolition of any structure more than 50 years old or located on a property Fisted in the inventory of Historic Resources shall be issued unless the provisions of this Section have been satisfied. B. Within 30 days of when an application for such a permit is deemed complete, the Planning Director shall review the historic significance of the property to determine whether the property meets the criteria for a Historic Landmark. If the Planning Director finds the property meets the criteria, he or she shall immediately initiate a Historic Landmark Application and provide written notice of the decision to the property owner. C. If the Planning Director initiates a Historic Landmark Application, no demolition permit shall issue until final action of the Council, denying the proposed designation, except as otherwise provided in Section 2.24.190. D. If the Planning Director does not initiate a Historic Landmark Application, within the 30 days specified by this section, the hold on the permit for demolition shall be released.. 2.24.190 Unsafe or Dangerous Conditions. A. None of the provisions of this Chapter shall be construed to prevent any construction, alteration, removal, demolition or relocation of a Historic Landmark or Contributing Resource necessary to correct the unsafe or dangerous conditions of any structure, or feature, or part thereof, where the Building & Safety Official .has declared such condition unsafe or dangerous and the proposed construction, alteration, removal, demolition or relocation necessary to correct the unsafe or dangerous condition. Only such work as is necessary to correct the unsafe or dangerous condition may be performed pursuant to this Section. B. The Building & Safety Official shall inform the Commission prior to authorizing any work pursuant to this Section unless he or she determines that such work is immediately necessary to correct the unsafe or dangerous condition; in which case, the Building and Safety Official shall report his or her actions to the Commission at its next regular meeting. Ordinance No. 848 -Page 16 of 20 P190 C. If work authorized by the Building & Safety official pursuant to his Section is not immediately necessary to correct the unsafe or dangerous condition, the Commission may advise the Building & Safety Official of the historic significance of the building and recommend a reasonable period of postponement for the purpose of arranging for rehabilitation, relocation, or salvage of the Historic Resource or Contributing Resource. Notwithstanding the forgoing, if no arrangements have been made for rehabilitation, relocation, or salvage within sixty days of an order to abate a nuisance, the Building & Safety Official may proceed with the abatement action. 2.24.200 Environmental Review. If any action required or taken pursuant to this Chapter is subject to the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act, the time in which such action must be taken shall be extended in order to allow time to comply with said Act, provided, however, that such action is taken within the time limits imposed by the Permit Streamlining Act. 2.24.210 Appeals. Any interested party may appeal any decision by the Commission or Planning Director under this Chapter pursuant to the limitations and procedures in Section 17.02.080 of the Municipal Code. Appeals must be filed within ten calendar days of the hearing body's decision. All appeals brought under this section shall be accompanied by a filing fee established by the Council. This Section shall not apply to decisions by the Planning Director whether to initiate a Historic Landmark designation application in accordance with Section 2.24.180.6, above. 2.24.220 Historic Preservation Fund. A. The Historic Preservation Fund is established to provide funding for historic preservation efforts such as surveys, development of design guidelines, public education, and incentive programs. All funds deposited into the Historic Preservation Fund shall be used solely for the conservation, preservation, restoration, or rehabilitation of Historic Resources. B. The Commission shall advise the Council regarding the use and expenditure of funds from the Historic Preservation Fund and shall recommend activities or actions necessary to fulfill the objectives of the Historic Preservation Fund. C. No money from the Historic 'Preservation Fund shall be used for the sole benefit of any property unless it has been designated a Historic Landmark, a Point of Historic Interest, or a Contributing Resource. 2.24.230 Preservation Incentives. To encourage owners to designate, maintain, preserve, rehabilitate, and improve Historic Landmarks and Contributing Resources, the City provides the incentives set forth in this Section. Only properties designated as Historic Landmarks or Contributing Resources are potentially eligible to apply for preservation incentives. A. Mills Act Contracts. Pursuant to and consistent with California Government Code, Section 50280, the Council may enter into Mills Act contracts with the owner of a Historic Landmark for the purpose of preservation, rehabilitation, and maintenance of designated Historic Resources, which shall a-low the owner to receive a reduction in property taxes in exchange for a commitment to specific repair, restoration, or rehabilitation improvements and satisfactory maintenance of the property. Ordinance No. 848 -Page 17 of 20 P191 The agreement shall include, but not be limited to, the contract provisions required under State law, and shall extend for a minimum period of 10 years, renewed annually, until and unless a notice of non-renewal or cancellation is filed. The application process, review procedures, and required contract provisions for Mills Act Agreements shall be established at the sole discretion of the Council based on the recommendations of the Commission in a form to be approved by the City Attorney. The program shall be implemented by the Planning Director or his designee. B. Public Recognition: The Commission may establish a program to publicly recognize Historic Resources, Points of Historic Interest, Historic Districts, and Conservation Districts with plaques, signage, and other appropriate forms of recognition. C. State Historical Building Code: Any alteration made for preservation, rehabilitation, restoration or relocation of Historic Resources may be made according to the requirements of the latest adopted State Historical Building Code. D. Nonconforming Parking: Single-family residences designated as Historic Resources that are nonconforming due to substandard parking shall not be required to provide parking according to current standards provided that additional floor area does not- exceed 50% of the existing floor area in any 24-month period. Multiple-family developed properties designated as Historic Resources that are nonconforming, due to substandard parking shall not be required to bring the existing parking into compliance with current parking requirements due to the addition of -new units provided that parking for the new units meets the current zoning standards. E. Fee Relief and Waivers: Historic Landmarks and Contributing Resources are eligible for the following fee waivers, refunds, and reductions: 1. A 50% refund of applicable building permit fees at time of issuance for projects found to be in compliance with the Secretary's Standards. 2. A 50% refund of applicable planning fees, not including applications made pursuant to this Chapter, at the time of issuance for projects found to be in compliance with the Secretary's Standards. 3. Waiver of application fees to operate a Large Family Day Care if the proposed location is a Historic Landmark or Contributing Resource. A Large Family Day Care means twelve children are being cared for in a private residence and up to fourteen children if two of the children are at least six years of age. F. Preservation Easements: The City may agree to acquire preservation easements on the facades of buildings designated as Historic Landmarks, or acquire such on the City's behalf, by a nonprofit group designated by the City through purchase, donation, or condemnation pursuant to California Civil Code 815. G. Alternative Conditional Use Permit Procedures. Where a proposed conditionally permitted use involving a Historic Landmark or Contributing Resource is small in scale and neither intensifies the use of the subject property nor disrupts any adjacent uses or neighborhood, the Planning Director may approve, conditionally approve, or deny the application in the same manner and subject to the same procedural requirements as a non- construction Conditional Use Permit pursuant to Section 17.04.035 of the Development Code. Applications approved by the Planning Director under this paragraph shall only be for small scale uses; including, but not limited to, boarding houses, bed and breakfasts, inns, small offices, boutiques, antique shops, bookstores, or florists. Ordinance No. 848 -Page 18 of 20 P192 If in the opinion of the Planning Director, the application involves unusual requirements or raises questions of land use policy substantially more significant than generally pertain to such application, the Planning Director may refer the application to the Planning Commission for consideration. Approval of a Conditional Use Permit under this paragraph shall neither waive any requirement of this Chapter nor excuse any performance required by this Chapter, including but not limited to the need for a Certificate of Appropriateness or Certificate of Economic Hardship. 2.24.240 Permit Application Filing Fees. Before accepting for filing any application described in this Chapter, the Planning Director shall charge and collect such administrative fees as may be set by resolution of the Council. 2.24.250 Public Hearings -Notice and Conduct. A. Whenever a public hearing is required by this Chapter, it shall be noticed and held in accordance with Section 17.02.110 of the Municipal Code. B. The Planning Director shall maintain a list of parties, including local historical organizations, who have asked for notice of public hearings regarding matters that affect designated or potential Historic Landmarks, Points of Historic Interest, Historic Districts, Conservation Districts, and Contributing Resources. The Planning Director shall provide as a courtesy to all persons and organizations on the list copies of all notices required by this Chapter. No action or inaction by the Council, Commission, the Planning Commission, or the Planning Director, shall be held void or invalid or be set aside by any Court due to failure to provide notice to any person or organization on the list pursuant to this paragraph. 2.24.260 Enforcement Authority. It shall be the duty of the Planning Director and the Building & Safety Official to administer and enforce the provisions of this Chapter with .the assistance of other City departments when deemed necessary. 2.24.270 Violations, Remedies and Penalties. A. It is unlawful for any person, firm, partnership or corporation to violate any provision or to fail to comply with any of the requirements of this Chapter. Each such person, firm, partnership, or corporation shall be deemed guilty of a separate offense for each and every day or any portion thereof during which any violation of any of the provisions of this Chapter is committed, continued or permitted by such person, firm, partnership, or corporation. B. Causing, permitting, aiding, abetting or concealing a violation of any provision of this Chapter is prohibited. C. Violations of this Chapter are subject to criminal misdemeanor penalties and civil penalties pursuant to Chapter 1.12 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, in addition to any penalties and remedies specified or available under this Chapter. The penalties and remedies provided for in this Section are cumulative and in addition to any other remedies available at law or in equity. The City may seek to remedy any violation of this Chapter by a civil action, including, without limitation, administrative or judicial nuisance abatement proceedings, civil or criminal code enforcement proceedings, and suits for injunctive relief. Ordinance No. 848 -Page 19 of 20 P193 D. A violation of this Chapter is declared to be a public nuisance and may be abated by the City through the administrative procedures specified in Chapter 8.23 or through civil process by means of restraining order, preliminary or permanent injunction, or in any other manner provided by law for the abatement of such nuisance. Abatement remedies may include but shall not be limited to reconstructing or restoring the property to its condition before the performance of work in violation of this Chapter, or in the case of a failure to maintain a Historic Landmark or Contributing Resource, by completing the work as required to stabilize and arrest further deterioration of the property. E. If a violation occurs in the absence of an approved development project, or while an application for a building permit or discretionary development approval is pending for the property upon which the Historic Landmark or Contributing Resource is located, the Planning Director or Building & Safety Official may issue a stop work order halting all development activity on the parcel to allow the City to determine appropriate mitigation measures, if any, and to ensure such measures are incorporated into any future or pending development approvals for the property. Mitigation measures may be imposed as a condition of any subsequent permits for development on the subject property. Ordinance No. 848 -Page 20 of 20 P194 STAFF REPORT RANCHO CUC.-1MONG.~1 FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Date: July 6, 2011 To: President and Members of the Board of Directors Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager From: Mike Bell, Fire Chief . By: Janet Walker, Management Analyst II RANCHO C;UCAMONGA Subject: APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE FIRE DISTRICT'S GENERAL FUND FINAL BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 2011/12 IN THE AMOUNT OF $18,771,000 RECOMMENDATION Consideration of approval of a resolution adopting the Fire District's General Fund Final Budget for Fiscal Year 2011/12 in the amount of $18,771,000. BACKGROUND The Health and Safety Code, commencing with Section 13890, requires that Fire Protection Districts: 1. adopt a preliminary budget; 2. publish notice regarding a public hearing for final budget adoption; and 3. that on or before October 1St of each year the Board shall adopt its final budget. In compliance with the above requirements, the Fire District Board of Directors has: 1. conducted a public budget workshop on May 26, 2011 and adopted the preliminary budget on June 9, 2011; 2. published on two occasions in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin notices regarding the public hearing for consideration of final budget adoption; and 3. submitted for consideration of approval a resolution adopting the General Fund Final Budget during the Board meeting scheduled for July 6, 2011. The Fire District was able to achieve a proposed balanced budget through a combination of slight revenue increases and improved operational and administrative efficiencies without the use of reserves or infusion of City General Fund revenues. P195 APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION ADOPT-ING THE FIRE DISTRICT'S GENERAL FUND PAGE 2 FINAL BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 2011/12 IN THE AMOUNT OF $18,771,000 JULY 6, 2011 The preliminary budget has been available for public inspection in accordance with the Health and Safety Code. The final budget is hereby presented for your consideration of approval. Respectfully submitted,' -~~: -~=~ Mike Bell Fire Chief Attachment: Resolution P196 RESOLUTION NO. FD 11- D 2 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, FIXING A FINAL BUDGET FOR THE FISCAL YEAR JULY 1, 2011 THROUGH JUNE 30, 2012 WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District adopted its General Fund Preliminary Budget on June 9, 2011, and made said preliminary budget available for inspection by interested taxpayers; and WHEREAS, the .Board of Directors noticed a time and place for a public hearing regarding the preliminary budget; and WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District conducted said hearing in accordance with requirements set forth in the Health and Safety Code of the State of California. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District does hereby adopt the General Fund Final Budget for the District for fiscal year 2011/12 and is hereby fixed and established as set forth and attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of , 2011. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: L. Dennis Michael., President ATTEST: Janice C. Reynolds, Secretary P197 I, JANICE C. REYNOLDS, SECRETARY of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, at a regular meeting of said Board held on the day of 2011. Executed .this day of 2011 at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Janice C. Reynolds, Secretary Resolution.No. 11- -Page 2 of 2 P198 STAFF REPORT ENGINEERING SERVICES DEP.\RT\iENT Date: July 6, 2011 To: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager From: Mark A. Steuer, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer By: Fred Lyn, Utilities Division Manager Christen Mitchell, Management Aide ~.~~ , ^ t~ ~- _~ 9 ~ANCHO CUCAMONGA Subject: CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AMENDING ELECTRIC. RATES, FEES AND CHARGES PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS AND AUTHORITY OF CHAPTER 3.46 OF TITLE 3 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE RECOMMENDATION The City Council adopts a Resolution amending the existing electric rates, fees and charges pursuant to the requirements and authority of Chapter 3.46 of Title 3 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code. BACKGROUND /ANALYSIS The City Council established a municipal utility on August 31, 2001. The City subsequently undertook actions necessary to obtain electricity from energy suppliers and build the necessary facilities to distribute the acquired electricity to retail customers within the City. The City Council determined that the adoption of Electric Service Rules and Regulations was necessary to further the orderly distribution of the electricity to the City's retail customers. The City Council subsequently adopted Chapter 3.46 of Title 3 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code establishing Electricity Service Rules and Regulations and authorizing that the rates, fees and charges, may be amended from time to time by resolution. Effective June 1, 2011, Southern California Edison's rates were modified. The net effect will decrease rates on average of 8 percent per month on Energy Charges, increase rates on average of 0.7 percent on Customer Charges and decrease rates per month on average of 11 percent on Demand Charges for Small, Medium, Medium TOU and Large Commercial customers. This change in RCMU Electric Service Rates will maintain parity with SCE Electric Service Rates effective June 1, 2011. The City has provided the required notification to the public by publishing notice of this hearing on June 24, 2011, and June 30, 2011, in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin, a local newspaper of general circulation, and posting notice in at least two separate locations within the City. The proposed revised rates have been available for public review in the City Clerk's Office since the advertisements and resolution were first published on June 24, 2011. The amended rates, fees and charges reflect the City's reasonable and prudent costs for such an enterprise and do not establish unfair, unreasonable or excessive rates that exceed the City's reasonable costs of doing business. Respect_ .submitted, ,...,' --~euer Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Attachment P199 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AMENDING. ELECTRIC RATES, FEES AND CHARGES PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS AND AUTHORITY OF CHAPTER 3:46 OF TITLE 3 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE. A. Recitals. 1. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has previously adopted Chapter 3.46 of Title 3 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code establishing Electricity Service Rules and Regulations and authorizing that the rates, fees and charges arising, directly or indirectly, under said legislation be adopted pursuant to resolution, and thereafter, be amended from time to time by resolution. City staff has prepared a comprehensive schedule of the rates, fees and charges that reflect the reasonable and prudent costs relating to the acquisition and distribution of electric power to retail customers and are recommending that the City Council adopt the recommended fees. These rates do not present the City an opportunity to achieve profits or to impose charges in excess of the costs reasonably related to the development, maintenance and expansion of a municipal electric distribution system. The City Council has directed City staff to regularly review the operations of the City's electric utility to ensure that the rates are sufficient to cover all prudent business costs, reserves and capital equipment acquisition but not exceeding the amount necessary for the same. The rates, fees and charges reflect the reasonable costs to the City system only and do not reflect any excess rates, fees, or charges that are in excess of the reasonable costs of providing the electrical services as set forth hereinafter. The City Council has reviewed the adoption of this Resolution pursuant to the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act. of 1970, as amended, and has determined that the adoption of the Electric Rules and Regulations has no foreseeable potential to a result in a significant impact upon the environment and is exempt from CEQA review pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3). Further, the City Council has determined that the adoption of the fees is exempt from substantive environmental review under Section 15273 of the State CEQA Guidelines as no capital projects for system expansion are included in the proposed action. 4. All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby find and resolve as follows: Section 1. The facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A of this Resolution, are true and correct. Section 2: The rates, fees and charges assessed under Chapter 3.46 of Title 3 shall be as set forth on Attachment 1 hereto and incorporated by reference as if fully set forth herein. Section 3. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. P200 Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility Current Rate Current Rate as of as of 5/31/2 011 6/30/2 011 Customer Classification Wgted Avg Rate Wgted Avg Rate Wgted Avg Rate Summer Winter Summer Winter Summer Winter Small Commercial Energy Charge ($/kWh) 0.18309 0.13378 0.16863 0.12555 -7.89 % -6.15% Customer Charge ($/day) 0.72800 0.72800 0.73300 0.73300 0.69 % 0.69 Three Phase Service ($/day) 0.03200 0.03200 0.03200 0.03200 0.00% 0.00% Medium Commercial Energy Charge ($/kWh) Non-TOU 0.08862 0.07509 0.08170 0.06973 -7.81 % -7.14 "f0U Summer On-Peak 0.13279 0.12080 -9.03 Summer Mid-Peak 0.08937 0.08236 -7.64% Summer Off-Peak 0.06557 0.06130 -6.51 Winter Mid-Peak 0.08663 0.07994 -7.73 Winter Off-Peak 0.06286 0.05691 -6.29 Demand Charge ($/kW) facilities Related 12.25 12.25 12.15 12.15 -0.82 % -0.82% Time Related Non TOU -Summ 19.26 - 17.05 - ~ -11.47% Time Related TOU -Summ On 16.88 - 14.94 - -11.49 Time Related TOU- Summ Mid 5.16 - 4.57 - -11.43 Customer Charge ($/Meter/Month) 133.19 133.19 134.17 134.17 ~ 0.74 % 0.74 Medium Commercial (TOU) Energy Charge ($/kWh) Summer On-Peak 0.11791 0.10714 -9.13 Summer Mid-Peak 0.09015 0.08262 -8.36 Summer Off-Peak 0.06915 ~ 0.06406 -7.36 WnterMid-Peak 0.07281 0.06730 -7.57% WnterON-Peak 0.05981 0.05581 -6.69° Demand Charge ($/k1M - facilities Related 13.24 13.24 13.19 13.19 -0.38 % -0.38% Time Related - On-Peak 14.67 - 12.96 - -11.66% Time Related -Mid-Peak 3.49 - 3.08 - -11.75 Power Factor Adjustment ($/KVA) 0.27 0.27 0.27 0.27 0.00 % 0.00 Customer Charge ($/Meter/Month) 469.00 469.00 472.44 472.44 0.73 % 0.73% Large Commercial Energy Charge ($/kWn) Summer On-Peak 0.13458 0.12253 -8.95 Summer Mid-Peak 0.09285 0.08504 -8.41% Summer Off-Peak 0.06650 0.06154 -7.46 Winter Mid-Peak 0.08427 0.07722 -8.36 Winter Off-Peak 0.06360 0.05898 -7.26 Demand Charge ($/k W) facilities Related 12.62 12.62 12.56 12.56 -0.48 % -0.48 Time Related - On-Peak 18.22 - 16.08 - -11.75 Time Related -Mid-Peak 5.13 - 4.53 -11.70 Power Factor Adjustment ($/KVA) 0.27 0.27 0.27 0.27 0.00 % ~ 0.00 Customer Charge ($/Meter/Month] 573.02 573.02 577.22 577.22 0.73% 0.73% Outside Lighting Energy Charge ($/kWh) 0.07235 0.07235 0.06451 0.06451 -10.84 % -10.84 Customer Charge ($/Meter/Month) 14.05 14.05 14.15 14.15 0.71 % 0.71 Street Lighting 150 Wattage Energy Charge ($/kWh/lamp) 0.07980 0.07980 0.07202 0.07202 -9.76% -9.76 Lamp Charge ($/Lamp/Month) 9.24 9.24 9.39 9.39 1.62 % 1.62 250 Wattage Energy Charge ($lkWhllamp) 0.07980 0.07980 0.07202 0.07202 -9.76 % -9.76 Lamp Charge ($/Lamp/Month) ~ 9.94 9.94 10.10 10.10 1.61 % 1.61 Traffic Control Energy Charge ($/kWh) 0.11761 0.11761 0.10961 0.10961 -6.81 % -6.81 Customer Charge ($/day) 0.51500 0.51500 0.51900 0.51900 0.78 % 0.78 Irrigation System Energy Charge ($/kWh) 0.18309 0.13378 0.16863 0.12555 -7.89% -6.15 Customer Charge ($/day) 0.72800 0.72800 0.73300 0.73300 0.69 % 0.69 WiR Fixed Energy Charge $/Device/Month 70.65 70.65 66.65 66.65 -5.67 % -5.67 Customer Charge$/Month 17.29 17.29 17.29 17.29 0.00% 0.00% Inspection Charge - $/Device/Month 12.60 12.60 12.60 12.60 0.00% - 0.00 Three-Phase Service - $/Day 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.00 % 0.00 Initialization of Service Charge 6.79 6.79 6.79 6.79 0.00 % 0.00 'Rates were calculated using the May 31 , 2011 DWR percentage of 27.050 for comparison purposes. P201 Table of Contents Electric Rates and Tariffs SMALL COMMERCIAL 1 MEDIUM COMMERCIAL 3 MEDIUM COMMERCIAL (TIME-OF-USE) 6 LARGE COMMERCIAL 9 STREET LIGHTING 13 TRAFFIC CONTROL 16 OUTDOOR AREA LIGHTING 18 IRRIGATION SYSTEMS 21 WIRELESS TECHNOLOGY 23 NET ENERGY METERING 25 SERVICE ESTABLISHMENT CHARGE 27 ELECTRIC CHARGES AND FEES SCHEDULE 28 P202 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL UTILITY ELECTRIC RATES & TARIFFS SMALL COMMERCIAL A. Applicability. Applicable to single and three-phase general service including lighting and power Customers, except for the Customer whose monthly Maximum Demand, in the opinion of the Utility, is expected to exceed 20 kW or has exceeded 20 kW in any three (3) months during the preceding twelve (12) months is ineligible for service under this Schedule. Effective with the date of ineligibility of any Customer served under this Schedule, the Customer's account shall be transferred to another applicable Rate Schedule. B. Territory. Within the entire territory served. C. Rates. Ener Char e $/kWh/Meter/Month Summer Current Rate Schedule is Winter available at www.CitvofRC.us/RCMU Customer Char e- $/Meter/Da 0.733 Three Phase Service - $/Da 0.032 The energy charge is calculated each month by using the current State Department of Water Resources (DWR) percentage. This percentage will be adjusted monthly to reflect actual energy purchases. D. Special Conditions. Summer and Winter Seasons are defined as follows: The Summer Season shall commence at 12:00 a.m. on June 1St and continue until 12:00 a.m. on October 1St of each year. The Winter Season shall commence at 12:00 a.m. on October 1St of each year and continue until 12:00 a.m. on June 1St of the following year. A pro rata computation will be made for seasonal billing purposes. 2. Voltage. Service will be supplied at one (1) standard voltage. 3. Three-Phase Service. Where the Utility provides three-phase service, the billing will be increased by the amount shown in the Rates section above. 4. Temporary Discontinuance of Service. Effective Date: June 1, 2011 P203 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL UTILITY' ELECTRIC RATES & TARIFFS Where the use of energy is seasonal or intermittent, no adjustments will be made for a temporary discontinuance of service. Any Customer, prior to resuming service within twelve (12) months after such service was discontinued, will be required to pay all charges which would have been billed if service had not been discontinued. 5. Customer-Owned Electrical Generating Facilities. Upon written approval by the Utility, momentary parallel operation may be permitted to allow the Customer to test the auxiliary/emergency generating facilities. 6. Installation of Demand Meters. Where a Customer's usage exceeds an average of 4,500 kWh per month in the preceding 12-month period, the Utility may, at its sole option, install a demand Meter on the account at the Utility's expense. 7. Billing Calculation. A Customer's bill is calculated according to the rates and conditions above. The charges are calculated by applying the Rate Charges when applicable to the actual billing determinants (kilowatt hours [kWh], demand [kW], etc.). 8: Power Cost Adjustment Factor (PCAF) The rates above are subject to an adjustment as provided in Rule 12, Section E. 9. Change of Law Adjustment Factor (CLAF) The rates above are subject to an adjustment as provided in Rule 12, Section F. 10. State Mandated Public Purpose Programs Charge. State law requires all California electric utilities to establish a public purpose programs charge of 2.85% of electric retail revenues to fund qualifying energy efficiency programs, renewable energy resources, research .and demonstration projects, and services for low-income electricity customers. 2 Effective Date: June 1, 201 I P204 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL UTILITY ELECTRIC RATES & TARIFFS MEDIUIIII COMMERCIAL A. Applicability. Applicable to single and three-phase service including lighting and power Customers whose monthly Maximum Demand registers, or in the opinion of the Utility is expected to register, above 20 kW and below 200 kW. The Customer whose monthly Maximum Demand, in the opinion of the Utility; is expected to reach 200 kW or has reached 200 kW for any three- (3) months during the preceding twelve (12) months is ineligible for service under this Schedule. Effective with the date of ineligibility, such Customer's account shall be transferred to another applicable Rate Schedule. Further, any Customer served under this Schedule whose monthly Maximum Demand has registered 20 kW or less for twelve (12) consecutive months is eligible for service under another applicable Rate Schedule. B. Territory. Within the entire territory served. C. Rates. Ener Char e - $/kWh/Meter/Month Non TOU Pricin O tion Summer Season Winter Season Current Rate Schedule is TOU Pricin O tion available at Summer Season - On-Peak www.CityofRC.us/RCMU Mid-Peak Off-Peak Winter Season -Mid-Peak Off-Peak Customer Char e - $/Meter/Month 134.17 Demand Char e - $/kW of Billin Demand/Meter/Month Facilities Related 12.15 Time Related -Non TOU Summer 17.05 Time Related - TOU Summer - On-Peak 14.94 Summer -Off-Peak 4.57 TOU O tion Meter Char e - $/Meter/Month RTEM 94.18 The energy charge is calculated each month by using the current State Department of Water Resources (DWR) percentage. This percentage will be adjusted monthly to reflect actual energy purchases. Effective Date: June ], 2011 P205 C[TY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL UTILITY ELECTRIC RATES & TARIFFS D. Special Conditions. Time periods are defined as follows: On-Peak: Noon to 6:00 p.m. summer weekdays except holidays. Mid-Peak: 8:00 a.m. to noon and 6:00 p.m. to 11:00 p.m. summer weekdays except holidays. 8:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. winter weekdays except holidays. Off-Peak: All other hours. Holidays are New Year's Day (January 1), Washington's Birthday (third Monday in February), Memorial Day (last Monday in May), Independence Day (July 4), Labor Day (first Monday in September), Veteran's Day (November 11), Thanksgiving Day (fourth Thursday iri November), and Christmas (December 25). When any holiday listed above falls on Sunday, the following Monday will be recognized as an off-peak period. No change will be made for holidays falling on Saturday. The Summer Season shall commence at 12:00 a.m. on June 1St and continue until 12:00 a.m. on October 1St of each year. The Winter Season shall commence at 12:00 a.m. on October 1St of each year and continue until 12:00 a.m. on June 1St of the following year. A pro rata computation will be made for seasonal billing purposes. 2. RTEM Metering. Customers may elect a Real Time Energy Metering (RTEM) meter and shall pay the monthly charges, as indicated in the Rates section of this Rate Schedule. Voltage. Service will be supplied at one (l) standard voltage. 4. Billing Demand. The Billing Demand shall be the kilowatts of Maximum Demand, determined to the nearest kW. The Demand Charge shall include the following billing components. The Time Related Component shall be for the kilowatts of Maximum Demand recorded during (or established for) the monthly billing period. The Facilities Related Component shall be for the kilowatts of Maximum Demand recorded during (or established for) the monthly billing period. However, when the Utility determines the Customer's Meter will record little or no energy use for extended periods of time or when the Customer's Meter has not recorded a Maximum Demand in the preceding eleven (11) months, the Facilities Related Component of the Demand Charge may be established at fifty percent (50%) of the Customer's Connected Load. 4 Effective Date: June 1, 2011 P206 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL UTILITY ELECTRIC RATES & TARIFFS 5. Maximum Demand. The Maximum Demand in any month shall be the measured maximum average kilowatt input, indicated or recorded by instruments, during any 15-minute metered interval in the month, but, where applicable, shall not be less than the diversified resistance welder load computed in accordance .with the section designated Welder Service in Rule 2. Where the demand is intermittent or subject to violent fluctuations, a 5-minute interval may be used. 6. Temporary Discontinuance of Service. Where the use of energy is seasonal or intermittent, no adjustments will be made for a temporary discontinuance of service. Any Customer resuming service within twelve (12) months after such service was discontinued will be required to pay all charges which would have been billed if service had not been discontinued. 7. Customer-Owned Electrical Generating Facilities. Upon written approval by the Utility, momentary parallel operation may be permitted to allow the Customer to test the auxiliary/emergency generating facilities. 8. Billing Calculation. A Customer's bill is calculated according to the rates and conditions above. The charges are calculated by applying the Rate Charges when applicable to the actual billing determinants (kilowatt hours [kWh], demand [kW], etc.). 9. Power Cost Adjustment Factor (PCAF) The rates above are subject to an adjustment as provided in Rule 12, Section E. 10. Change of Law Adjustment Factor (CLAF). The rates above are subject to an,adjustment as provided in Rule 12, Section F. 11. State Mandated Public Purpose Programs Charge. State law requires all California electric utilities to establish a public purpose programs charge of 2.85% of electric retail revenues to fund qualifying energy efficiency programs, renewable energy resources, research and demonstration projects, and services for low-income electricity customers. 5 Effective Date: June 1, 2011 P207 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL UTILITY ELECTRIC RATES & TARIFFS MEDIUM COMMERCIAL (TIME-OF-USE) A. Applicability. Applicable to single and three-phase service including lighting and power Customers whose monthly Maximum Demand registers, or in the opinion of the Utility is expected to register 200 kW through 500 kW. The customer whose monthly Maximum Demand, in the opinion of the Utility, is expected to exceed 500 kW or has exceeded 500 kW for any three (3) months during the preceding twelve (12) months is ineligible for service under this Schedule and effective with the date of ineligibility, such Customer's account shall be transferred to Large Commercial. Further, any Customer served under this Schedule whose monthly Maximum Demand has registered below 200 kW for twelve (12) consecutive months is ineligible for service under this Rate Schedule, and shall be transferred to another applicable Rate Schedule. B. Territory. Within the entire territory served. C. Rates. Ener Char e - $/kWh/Meter/Month Summer Season - On-Peak Mid-Peak Current Rate Schedule is Off-Peak available at Winter Season - Mid-Peak www.CityofRC.us/RC1y1U Off-Peak Customer Char e - $/Meter/Month 472.44 Demand Char e - $/kW of Billin Demand/Meter/Month Facilities Related 13.19 Time Related Summer Season - On-Peak 12.96 Mid-Peak 3.08 Power Factor Ad'ustment - $/KVA 0.27 1. The energy charge is calculated each month by using the current State Department of Water Resources (DWR) percentage. This percentage will be adjusted monthly to reflect actual energy purchases. D. Special Conditions. Time periods are defined as follows: On-Peak: Noon to 6:00 p.m. summer weekdays except holidays. Mid-Peak: 8:00 a.m. to noon and 6:00 p.m. to 11:00 p.m. summer weekdays except holidays. 8:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. winter weekdays except holidays. Off-Peak: All other hours 6 Effective Date: June 1, 2011 P208 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL UTILITY ELECTRIC RATES & TARIFFS Holidays are New Year's Day (January 1), Washington's Birthday (third Monday in February), Memorial Day (last Monday in May), Independence Day (July 4), Labor Day (first Monday in September), Veteran's Day (November 11), Thanksgiving Day (fourth Thursday in November), and Christmas (December 25). When any holiday listed above falls on Sunday, the following Monday will be recognized as an off-peak period. No change will be made for holidays falling on Saturday. The Summer Season shall commence at 12:00 a.m. on June 1St and continue until 12:00 a.m. on October 1st of each year. The Winter Season shall commence at 12:00 a.m. on October 1St of each year and continue until 12:00 a.m. on June 1St of the following year. A pro rata computation will be made for seasonal billing purposes. Voltage. Service will be supplied at one (1) standard voltage Billing Demand. The Billing Demand shall be the kilowatts of Maximum Demand, determined to the nearest kW. The Demand Charge shall include the following billing components. The Tiine Related Component shall be for the kilowatts of Maximum Demand recorded during (or established for) the monthly billing period. The Facilities Related Component shall be for the kilowatts of Maximum Demand recorded during (or established for) the monthly billing period. However, when the Utility determines the Customer's Meter will record little or no energy use for extended periods of time or when the Customer's Meter has not recorded a Maximum Demand in the preceding eleven (11) months, the Facilities Related Component of the Demand Charge may be established at fifty percent (50%) of the Customer's Connected Load.. 4. Maximum Demand. Maximum Demand shall be established for the On-Peak, Mid-Peak, and Off-Peak periods. The Maximum Demand in any month shall be the measured maximum average kilowatt input, indicated or recorded by instruments, during any 15- minute metered interval in the month, but, where applicable, shall not be less than the diversified resistance welder load computed in accordance with the section designated Welder Service in Rule 2. Where the demand is intermittent or subject to violent fluctuations, a 5-minute interval may be used. . Power Factor Adjustment. 7 Effective Date: June 1, 2011 P209 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL UTILITY ELECTRIC RATES & TARIFFS The Customer's bill will be increased each month for power factor by the amount shown in the Rates section above for service metered and delivered at the applicable voltage level, based on the per kilovar of maximum reactive demand imposed by the Utility. The maximum reactive demand shall be the highest measured maximum average kilovar demand indicated or recorded by metering during any 15 minute interval in the month. The kilovars shall be determined to the nearest unit. A device will be installed on each kilovar meter to prevent reverse operation of the meter. 6. Temporary Discontinuance of Service. Where the use of energy is seasonal or intermittent, no adjustments will be made for a temporary discontinuance of service. Any Customer resuming service within twelve (12} months after such service was discontinued will be required to pay all charges which would have been billed if service had not been discontinued. ' 7. Customer-Owned Electrical Generating Facilities. Upon written approval by the Utility, momentary parallel operation may be permitted to allow the Customer to test the auxiliary/emergency generating facilities. 8. Billing Calculation. A Customer's bill is calculated according to the rates and conditions above. The charges are calculated by applying the Rate Charges when applicable to the actual billing determinants (kilowatt hour's [kWh], demand [kW], kilovar [kVa], etc.). 9. Power Cost Adjustment Factor (PCAF). The rates above are subject to an adjustment as provided in Rule 12, Section E. 10. Change of Law Adjustment Factor (CLAF). The rates above are subject to an adjustment as provided in Rule 12, Section F. 11. State Mandated Public Purpose Programs Charge. State law requires all California electric utilities to establish a public purpose programs charge of 2.85% of electric retail revenues to fund qualifying energy efficiency programs, renewable energy resources, research and demonstration projects, and services for low-income electricity customers. Effective Date: June 1, 201 ] P210 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL UTILITY ELECTRIC RATES & TARIFFS LARGE COMMERCIAL A. Applicability. Applicable to general services including lighting and power Customers. This Schedule is applicable to and mandatory for all Customers whose monthly Maximum Demand, in the opinion of the Utility, is expected to exceed 500 kW or has exceeded 500 kW in any three (3) months during the preceding twelve (12) months. Any existing Customer on this Schedule whose monthly Maximum Demand has registered 500 kW or less for twelve (12) consecutive months is ineligible for service under this Schedule and shall be transferred to another applicable Rate Schedule. Service under this Schedule is subject to Meter availability, B. Territory. Within the entire territory served. C. Rates. Ener Char e - $/kWh/Meter/Month Summer Season - On-Peak d l i R S h C Mid-Peak u e s urrent ate c e il bl t Off-Peak a e a ava , ,~,~, Cit us/RCMIJ oflZC Winter Season - Mid-Peak ~ ~ y . Off-Peak Customer Char e - $/Meter/Month 577.22 Demand Charge - $/kW of Billing Demand/Meter/Month Facilities Related ~ 12.56 Time Related Summer Season - On-Peak 16.08 Mid-Peak 4.53 Power Factor Ad~ustment - $/KVA 0.27 The energy charge is calculated each month by using the current State Department of Water Resources (DWR) percentage. This percentage will be adjusted monthly to reflect actual energy purchases. Effective Date: June 1, 2011 P211 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL UTILITY ELECTRIC RATES & TARIFFS D. Special Conditions. 1. Time periods are defined as follows: On-Peak: Noon to 6:00 p.m. summer weekdays except holidays. Mid-Peak: 8:00 a.m. to noon and 6:00 p.m. to 11:00 p.m. summer weekdays except holidays. 8:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. winter weekdays except holidays. Off-Peak: All other hours. Holidays are New Year's Day (January 1), Washington's Birthday (third Monday in February), .Memorial Day (last Monday in May), Independence Day (July 4), Labor Day (first Monday in September), Veteran's Day (November 11), Thanksgiving Day (fourth Thursday in November), and Christmas (December 25). When any holiday listed above falls on Sunday, the following Monday will be recognized as an off-peak period. No change will be made for holidays falling on Saturday. The Summer Season shall commence at 12:00 a.m. on June 1St and continue until 12:00 a.m. on October 1St of each year. The Winter Season shall commence at 12:00 a.m. on October 1St of each year and continue until 12:00 a.m. on June 1St of the following year. A pro rata computation will be made for seasonal billing purposes. 2. Voltage. Service will be supplied at one standard voltage. 3. Maximum Demand Maximum Demands shall be established for the On-Peak, Mid-Peak, and Off- Peak periods. The Maximum Demand for each period shall be the measured maximum average kilowatt input indicated or recorded by instruments, during any 15-minute metered interval, but, .where applicable, not less than the diversified resistance welder load computed in accordance with the section designated Welder Service in Rule 2. Where the demand is intermittent or subject to violent fluctuations, a 5-minute interval may be used. 4.. Billing Demand. The Billing Demand shall be the kilowatts of Maximum Demand, determined to the nearest kW. ,The Demand Charge shall include the following billing components. ' The Time Related Component shall be for the kilowatts of Maximum Demand recorded during (or established for) the monthly billing period for each of the On-Peak, Mid-Peak, and Off-Peak Time Periods. The Facilities Related Component shall be for the kilowatts of Maximum Demand recorded during (or established for) the monthly billing period. However, when the Utility 10 Effective Date: June 1, 2011 P212 C[TY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL UTILITY ELECTRIC RATES & TARIFFS determines the Customer's Meter will record little or no energy use for extended periods of time or when the Customer's Meter has not recorded a Maximum Demand in the preceding eleven (11) months, the Facilities Related Component of the Demand Charge may be established at fifty percent (50%) of the Customer's Connected Load. Separate Demand Charge(s) for the On-Peak, Mid-Peak, and Off-Peak Time Periods shall be established for each monthly billing period. The Demand Charge for each time period shall be based on the Maximum Demand for that time period occurring during the respective monthly billing period. Power Factor Adjustment. The. Customer's bill will be increased each month for power factor by the amount shown in the Rates section above for service metered and delivered at the applicable voltage level, based on the per kilovar of maximum reactive demand imposed by the Utility. The maximum reactive demand shall be the highest measured maximum average kilovar demand indicated or recorded by metering during any 15 minute metered interval in the month. The kilovars shall be determined to the nearest unit. A device will be installed on each kilovar Meter to prevent reverse operation of the Meter. 6. Temporary Discontinuance of Service Where the use of energy is seasonal or intermittent, no adjustments will be made for a temporary discontinuance of service. Any Customer, prior to resuming service within twelve (12) months after such service was discontinued, will be required to pay all charges which would have been billed if service had not been discontinued. Customer-Owned Electrical Generating Facilities. Upon written approval by the Utility, momentary parallel operation may be permitted to allow the Customer to test the auxiliary/emergency generating facilities. 8. Contracts. An initial three-year facilities contract may be required where Applicant requires new or added serving capacity exceeding 2,000 kVA. 9. Billing Calculation. A Customer's bill is calculated according to the rates and conditions above. The charges are calculated by applying the Rate Charges when applicable to the actual billing determinants (kilowatt hours [kWh], demand [kW], kilovar [kVa], etc.). 10. Power Cost Adjustment Factor (PCAF). 1 1 Effective Date: June 1, 201 ] P213 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL UTILITY ELECTRIC RATES & TARIFFS The rates above are subject to an adjustment as provided in Rule 12, Section E. 11. Change of Law Adjustment Factor (CLAF). The rates above are subject to an adjustment as provided in Rule 12, Section F. 12. State Mandated Public Purpose Programs Charge. State law requires all California electric utilities to establish a public purpose programs charge of 2.85% of electric retail revenues to fund qualifying energy efficiency programs, renewable energy resources, research and demonstration projects, and services for low-income electricity customers. 12 Effective Date: June 1, 2011 P214 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL UTILITY ELECTRIC RATES & TARIFFS STREET LIGHTING A. Applicability. Applicable to meter for the lighting of streets, and publicly-owned and publicly-operated automobile parking lots which are opened to the general public where the City owns and maintains the street lighting equipment and associated facilities included under this Schedule. B. Territory. Within the entire territory served. C. Rates High Pressure Sodium Vapor Lamps -All Night Service Lam Watta e Initial Lumens $/Lam /Month Current Rate Schedule is 150 250 16,000 27,500 available at ~~ww.CitvofRC.us/RCMU 1. The energy charge is calculated each month by using the current State Department of Water Resources (DWR) percentage. This percentage will be adjusted monthly to reflect actual energy purchases. D. Special Conditions The Applicant shall install streetlights that will be served by the Utility. These streetlights must be installed in accordance with the Utility's specifications and the developer will deed, such facilities to the City. 2. Requirements and Restrictions. a. The Applicant for street light service shall specify the type of service, lamp size, and location of street lights. b. Service shall not be furnished under this Schedule where location, mounting height, and/or other considerations are unacceptable to the Utility. c. The installation of street lighting equipment and facilities hereunder is contingent upon the utility obtaining easements, and rights of way, as may be required, satisfactory to the Utility for the required poles, lines, equipment, and facilities. d. Should the Applicant not commence using the street lighting in a bona fide manner within ninety (90) days after date of completion and installation of 13 Effective Date: June 1, 201 I P215 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL UTILITY ELECTRIC RATES & TARIFFS a street light or street lighting system requested by the Applicant, the Utility will bill, and the Applicant shall pay, the applicable lamp charges(s). 3. Hours of Service. Under the Utility's standard all night operating schedule, approximately 4,140 hours of service per year will be furnished. 4. Maintenance. The Utility shall exercise reasonable care and diligence in maintaining its street light facilities or Utility-owned attachments thereto. Where the Utility experiences, or expects to experience, maintenance costs exceeding its normal maintenance expense resulting from, but not limited to, vandalism, the Utility may require the customer to pay the excess maintenance expense. 5. Liability of the Utility. The Utility shall not, by taking action pursuant to its tariffs, be liable for any loss, damage, or injury, established or alleged, which may result, or be claimed to result, therefrom. 6. Removal, Relocation or Modification of Facilities. Where street lighting service and facilities are ordered removed by a customer, the customer shall pay to the Utility a nonrefundable amount equal to the total estimated cost installed less any Customer contribution, plus the estimated cost of removal less the estimated net salvage value of the facilities. Where street lighting service and facilities were ordered removed by a Customer and such service and facilities, or their equivalent are ordered reinstalled within thirty-six (36) months from the date of the order to remove, the Customer shall pay to the Utility in advance of reinstallation a nonrefundable amount equal to the cost of removal of the prior facilities and the estimated cost of such reinstallation. Where street lighting facilities are ordered modified and /or relocated by a Customer, the Customer shall pay to the Utility, in advance of such modification and/or relocation, a nonrefundable amount equal to the estimated cost of such modification and/or relocation. This includes facilities that now serve street light load only, but that may have been installed originally to serve other than street light load. Utility-owned facilities removed or installed remain the sole property of the Utility. 7. Billing Calculation. 14 Effective Date: June 1, 201 1 P216 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL UTILITY ELECTRIC RATES & TARIFFS A Customer's bill is calculated according to the rates and conditions above. 8. Power Cost Adjustment Factor (PCAF). The rates above are subject to an adjustment as provided in Rule 12, Section E. 9. Change of Law Adjustment Factor (CLAF). The rates above are subject to an adjustment as provided in Rule 12, Section F. 10. State Mandated Public Purpose Programs Charge. State law requires all California electric utilities to establish a public purpose programs charge of 2.85% of electric retail revenues to fund qualifying energy efficiency programs, renewable energy resources, research and demonstration projects, and services for low-income electricity customers. 15 Effective Date: June 1, 2011 P217 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL UTILITY ELECTRIC RATES & TARIFFS TRAFFIC CONTROL A. Applicability. Applicable to single and three-phase service for traffic directional signs or traffic signal systems located on streets, highways and other public thoroughfares and to railway crossing and track signals; for public thoroughfare lighting that is utilized twenty-four (24) hours per day or is not controlled by switching equipment, such as tunnel or underpass lighting; and, to public authorities for the illumination of bus stop shelters located in the dedicated road right-of--way where such service is combined with other traffic control service as defined above. B. Territory. The entire territory served. C. Rates. ~ $/Traffic Signal/Month Current Rate Schedule is Customer Charge/Day $0.519 available at www.Cit ofRC.us/RCMU 1. The energy charge is calculated each month by using the current State Department of Water Resources (DWR) percentage. This percentage will be adjusted monthly to reflect actual energy purchases. D. Special Conditions 1. Voltage. Service will be supplied at one (1) standard voltage not in excess of 240 volts or, at the option of the Utility, at 240/480 volts, three wire, single-phase. 2. Billing Calculation. A Customer's bill is calculated according to the rate and conditions above. 3. Power Cost Adjustment Factor (PCAF). The rate above is subject to an adjustment as provided in Rule 12, Section E. 4. Change of Law Adjustment Factor (CLAP) The rate above is subject to an adjustment as provided in Rule 12, Section F. 5. State Mandated Public Purpose Programs Charge. State law requires all California electric utilities to establish a public purpose programs charge of 2.85% of electric retail revenues to fund qualifying energy efficiency programs, renewable energy resources, research and demonstration 1 6 Effective Date: June 1, 2011 P218 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL UTILITY ELECTRIC RATES & TARIFFS projects, and services for low-income electricity customers. 17 Effective Date: June 1, 2011 P219 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL UTILITY ELECTRIC RATES & TARIFFS OUTDOOR AREA LIGHTING A. Applicability. Applicable to single-phase service for metered outdoor area ]fighting load, controlled for dusk to dawn operation and used for purposes other than street and highway lighting such as, but not limited to parking lots, pedestrian walkways, billboards, building exteriors, security, sports and recreation areas, monuments, decorative areas, and bus shelters. B. Territory. Within the entire territory served. C. Rates. Ener Char e - $/kWh/Meter/Month Current Rate Schedule is Customer Charge- $/Meter/Month $14.15 available at www.CityofRC.us/RCMI1 The energy charge is calculated each month by using the current State Department of Water Resources (DWR) percentage. This percentage will be adjusted monthly to reflect actual energy purchases. D. Special Conditions Voltage. Service will be provided at one (1) standard voltage. 2. Three-Phase Service. Where, in the sole opinion of the Utility, it is impractical to provide single-phase service under this Schedule, three-phase service will be provided. Separate Point of Delivery. When requested by the Applicant or Customer, and agreed upon by the Utility, an additional Point of Delivery may be provided, separate from any other Point of Delivery provided under any other applicable Rate Schedule. Customers so served shall not be permitted to have an electrical interconnection beyond the Utility's Point of Delivery between the separately metered loads except upon written approval of the Utility. 1$ Effective Date: June 1, 2011 P220 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL UTILITY ELECTRIC RATES & TARIFFS A change from this Schedule to any other Rate Schedule will be permitted if the additional Point of Delivery is removed. Any such removal shall be at the Customer's expense. Any .rearrangement of facilities required to provide the additional Point of Delivery shall be at the expense of the requesting Applicant or Customer. 4. Controlled Operation. Service under this Schedule requires the control of lamps in a manner acceptable to the Utility so that lamps will not be lighted daily from dawn to dusk. Customer shall install, own, operate, and maintain the control device. The Utility shall have the right to periodically inspect the control device to ensure its correct operation and maintenance. 5. Distribution Line Extension. Distribution Line Extensions to reach an outdoor area light or area lighting system shall be in accordance with Rule 15. 6. Services. Services shall be installed and maintained as provided in Rule 16. 7. Incidental Loads. Incidental, non-lighting loads may be served under this Schedule only where such Connected Loads do not exceed fifteen percent (l5) of the Customer's total Connected Load. Incidental Loads must also be controlled for dusk to dawn operation exclusively. 8. Billing Calculation. A Customer's bill is calculated according to the rates and conditions above. The charges are calculated by applying the Rate Charges when applicable to the actual billing determinants (kilowatt hours [kWh], demand [kW], etc.). 9. Power Cost Adjustment Factor (PCAF). The rates above are subject to an adjustment as provided in Rule 12, Section E. l0. Change of Law Adjustment Factor (CLAF). The rates above are subject to an adjustment as provided in Rule 12, Section F. 11. State Mandated Public Purpose Programs Charge. State law requires all California electric utilities to establish a public purpose programs charge of 2.85% of electric retail revenues to fund qualifying energy 19 Effective Date: June 1, 2011 P221 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL UTILITY ELECTRIC RATES & TARIFFS efficiency programs, renewable energy resources, research and demonstration projects, and services for low-income electricity customers. 2Q Effective Date: June 1, 2011 P222 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL UTILITY ELECTRIC RATES & TARIFFS IRRIGATION SYSTEMS A. Applicability. Applicable where the Utility determines .that 100% of the customer's electrical usage is for limited irrigation service except for the Customer whose monthly Maximum Demand, in the opinion of the Utility, is expected to exceed 20 kW or has exceeded 20 kW in any three (3) months during the preceding twelve (12) months is ineligible for service under this Schedule. Effective with the date of ineligibility of any Customer served under this Schedule, the Customer's account shall be transferred to another applicable Rate Schedule. B. Territory. The entire territory served. C. Rates. $/Irrigation System/Month Current Rate Schedule is Customer Charge/Day $0.733 available at www.CitvofRC.us/RCM U The energy charge is calculated each month by using the current State Department of Water Resources (DWR) percentage. This percentage will be adjusted monthly to reflect actual energy purchases. D. Special Condition . 1. Voltage. Service will be supplied at one (1) standard voltage not in excess of 240 volts or, at the option of the Utility, at 240/480 volts, three wire, single-phase. 2. Billing Calculation. A Customer's bill is calculated according to the rate and conditions above. 3. Power Cost Adjustment Factor (PCAF) The rate above is subject to an adjustment as provided in Rule 12, Section E. 4. Change of Law Adjustment Factor (CLAF) The rate above is subject to an adjustment as provided in Rule 12, Section F. 5. -State Mandated Public Purpose Programs Charge. State law requires all California electric utilities to establish a public purpose programs charge of 2.85% of electric retail revenues to fund qualifying energy 21 Effective Date: June 1, 2011 P223 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL UTILITY ELECTRIC RATES & TARIFFS efficiency programs, renewable energy resources, research and demonstration projects, and services for low-income electricity customers. 2,2 Effective Date: June 1, 2011 P224 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL UTILITY ELECTRIC RATES & TARIFFS WIRELESS TECHNOLOGY A. Applicability. Applicable to single-phase service for wireless technology industries that require electric service to operate radio repeaters or similar devices (wireless communication devices) that are mounted on existing City facilities, or other facilities approved by the Utility and are unmetered. This Schedule excludes Wi-Fi devices on "looped" (served by 120/240 volts) streetlight facilities. Customers must execute an application contract with the Utility for service under this Schedule, and must execute an applicable agreement when devices are attached to City facilities. The monthly kilowatt-hour (kWh) usage of each device shall not exceed 500 kWh. Effective with the date of ineligibility of any Customer served under this Schedule, the Customer's account shall be transferred to another applicable Rate Schedule. If the Customer's account cannot be transferred to another applicable Rate Schedule, the account will be closed, the Utility's service will be removed and the Customer must remove its device and equipment form the applicable City facility. B. Territory. Within the entire territory served. C. Rates. Fixed Energy Charge - $/Device/Month Current Rate Schedule is available at www.Cit ~ofRC.us/RCMU Customer Char e - $/Month 17.29 Ins ection Char e - $/Device/Month 12.60 Three-Phase Service - $/Da 0.03 Initialization of Service Charge -One-time char e 6.79 The energy charge is calculated each month by using the current State Department of Water Resources (DWR) percentage. This percentage will be adjusted monthly to reflect actual energy purchases. D. Special Conditions. Contract. An approved City contract is required for service under this Rate Schedule. Voltage. Service will be supplied at one (1) standard voltage not in excess of 240 volts. Three-Phase Service. Where the Utility provides three-phase service, the billing will be increased by the amount shown in the Rates section above. Maximum Wattage. The maximum watts/connected load/name plate is 746 watts. 23 Effective Date: June 1, 2011 P225 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL UTILITY ELECTRIC RATES & TARIFFS 5. .Installation. The device(s) shall be installed on City facilities or other facilities approved by the Utility. When the devices are installed on City facilities, the installation and removal of such device(s) will be performed by the Customer, and at the Customer's expense. Device installation shall not be performed under this Rate Schedule, where location, mounting height, and/or other considerations are not acceptable to the Utility. Unless approved by the Utility, all wireless communication devices must be visible to the Utility. 7. Modification of Facilities. No modifications can be made to the Customer-owned wireless communications devices unless approved by the Utility. Where the Customer requests a modification of City facilities, and such modifications are acceptable to the City, the City will perform the requested modifications. at the Customer's expense. 8. `Maintenance. The Utility shall exercise reasonable care and diligence in maintaining its facilities. Upon installation of the device(s), where the Utility experiences, or expects to experience, maintenance costs exceeding its normal maintenance expense resulting from, but not limited to, vandalism, the Utility may require the Customer to pay the excess maintenance expense. 9. Liability of the Utility. The Utility shall not, by taking action pursuant to its tariffs, be liable for any loss, damage, or injury, established or alleged, which may result, or be claimed to result, there from. 10. Initialization of Service Charge. A one-time charge, as shown in the Rates section of this Rate Schedule, is applied to each service account provided service under this Rate Schedule to recover the costs of a lock and spare fuse which are required with the initialization of service. 11. Power Cost Adjustment Factor (PCAF). The rates above are subject to an adjustment as provided in Rule 12, Section E 12. Change of Law Adjustment Factor (CLAP). The rates above are subject to an adjustment as provided in Rule 12, Section F. 13. State Mandated Public Purpose Programs Charge. State law requires all California electric utilities to establish a public purpose programs charge of 2.85% of electric retail revenues to fund qualifying energy efficiency programs, renewable energy resources, research and demonstration projects, and services for low-income electricity customers. 24 Effective Date: June I, 2011 P226 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL UTILITY ELECTRIC RATES & TARIFFS NET ENERGY METERING A. Applicability Applicable to a customer who operates a solar generating facility that is located on the customer's premises with a capacity of not more than 1 MW that is interconnected and operates in parallel with the City's electric system, intended primarily to offset part or all of the customer's own electrical requirements, and meets all the applicable safety and performance standards. This Schedule shall be closed to new customers once the combined nameplate rated generating capacity, for all customers served under this Schedule exceed two and one-half percent (2.5%) of the City's peak demand. B. Territory The entire territory served C. Rates As determined in each billing period, when a customer consumes more energy than generated at the premises, the net consumed energy will be used in the calculation .of all applicable energy charges, calculated by multiplying the net amount consumed by the applicable energy rate. components of the customer's OAT. 2. As determined in each billing period, when a customer generates more energy than is consumed by the customer, the net kilowatt-hours of production will be carried forward into the next billing period. 3. Customers who are Net Surplus Electricity producers may elect to either carry over annual Net Surplus Energy production (in kilowatt hours) as a credit that will be applied to kilowatt hours subsequently supplied to Customer by RCMU or Customer may elect to receive payment for annual Net Surplus Electricity production and be compensated for each kilowatt-hour of Net Surplus Electricity production at a rate equivalent to the highest hourly rate that was charged for consumption in their OAT during the year prior to the Customer's Annual Billing Date. D. Special Condition 1. An executed Net Energy Metering and Generating Facility Interconnection Agreement is required prior to receiving service under this Schedule. 2. Metering Requirements - If the customer's existing meter is not capable of measuring the flow of energy in two directions, an appropriate meter shall be provided at the expense of the customer. The City may elect to install an additional meter or meters, at the City's expense to provide the information necessary to accurately bill or credit the customer. 25 Effective Date: June 1, 2011 P227 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL UTILITY ELECTRIC RATES & TARIFFS 3. Billing a. City shall provide all customers served under this Schedule with net energy consumption information and/or net energy export information with each monthly bill. b. Customers served under this Schedule shall pay both energy and non-energy charges on a monthly basis, in accordance with the customer's OAT except as otherwise allowed by State law. The value of net energy production will be used to offset only energy related charges in subsequent billing periods. 4. Definitions a. Net energy metering measures the difference between the electricity supplied through the electric grid and the .electricity generated on the customer's premises and fed back to the electric grid. b. Otherwise Applicable Tariff (OAT) is the customer's regularly filed rate schedule under which service is rendered. c. Net Surplus Electricity is the electricity generated by an eligible customer- generator measured in kilowatt hours over a 12-month period that exceeds the .amount of electricity consumed by that eligible customer-generator. 26 Effective Date: June 1, 20l 1 P228 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL UTILITY ELECTRIC RATES & TARIFFS SERVICE ESTABLISHMENT CHARGE A. Applicability. Applicable to General Service. and Domestic Service customers. B. Territory. Within the entire territory served. C. Rates. For each establishment of electric service .................................... $15.00 D. Special Conditions. 1. The service establishment charge provided for herein is in addition to the charges calculated in accordance with the applicable schedule and may be made each time an account is established. As used herein, establishment means each time an account is opened, including a turn on of electric service or a change of name which requires a meter reading. 2. In case the customer requests that electric service be established on the day of his request or outside of regular hours, an additional charge of $11:00 may be made. 27 Effective Date: June 1, 2011 P229 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL UTILITY ELECTRIC RATES & TARIFFS Electric Fees and Charges Schedule Applicability Applicable to all classes of service as provided in accordance with the Electric Rules and Regulations. Does not supersede any fees and charges listed in the rules which are not included on this schedule. Description Minimum Deposit Minimum Deposit/Reconnection Service Turn-on Charge Fee Amount Greater of twice estimated average monthly bill or $100 Greater of three times the estimated average monthly bill or $100 $20 next day $35 same day $50 after hours Special Appointment Turn-On Charge added to applicable $10 fee (Does not apply to the normal 4-hour window appointment) Return Check Charge Fund Verification Fee Trip charge for additional field visits (cut-off for non payment, etc.) Meter Test/Second Request Within One Year Period Re-Read/second request within six months Appointment based meter reads Monthly rental of Remote Metering to resolve access issues Temporary Turn On or Turn Off of electric service for repair (normal working hours) first aggregate hour is free Temporary Turn On or Turn Off of electric service for repair (after normal hours) Cost to investigate energy diversion Generating Facility Interconnection Plan Check and Inspection Rate In accordance with City of Rancho Cucamonga Ordinance $5.00 $15.00 $100 paid in advance (if error is found, fee will be refunded) $25 (if error is found fee will be refunded) $25 $2.50 per month $95 per hour or faction thereof $130 per hour or faction thereof Higher of $150 plus material or time and material $150 per hour 2,g Effective Date: June 1, 2011 P230 STAFF REPORT ENGINEERING SER~'ICE~ DEP.-1RT~IENT Date: July 6, 2011 To: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager From: Mark A. Steuer, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer By: Linda Ceballos, Environmental Programs Manager RANCHO C,'UCAMONGA Subject: APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING A SELF-HAUL PERMIT FEE PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS AND AUTHORITY OF CHAPTER 8.17 AND CHAPTER 8.19 OF TITLE 8 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE RECOMMENDATION Recommend the approval of a resolution of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga establishing aself-haul permit fee pursuant to the requirements and authority of Chapter 8.17 and Chapter 8.19 of Title 8 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code. BACKGROUND/ ANALYSIS City Council approved Ordinance No. 838 on April 6, 2011, establishing mandatory payment of trash service by both residents and businesses in the City. The ordinance includes an exception to the mandatory payment provision that allows residents or businesses to self-haul their trash, provided they meet specific guidelines, complete an application, and pay an annual permit fee. Per the ordinance, a resolution must be approved to establish the self-haul permit fee. Staff conducted a comprehensive survey of other municipalities that require aself-haul permit and also charged aself-haul permit fee. The fee charged varied by city, as did reporting requirements. The City of Rancho Cucamonga Self-Haul Permit requires a resident or business to complete an application and, if approved, submit two reports per year that would include weekly receipts documenting proper disposal of trash. Staff estimates that it would take approximately 1.5 hours to review each permit application and also review and verify the required reports. An annual permit fee of $50 is recommended to cover the staff time necessary to process each self-haul permit. Staff presented the survey findings and permit fee recommendation to the Refuse Service Level and Illegal Dumping Ad Hoc Committee on June 8, 2011. The Ad Hoc committee recommended the fee for Council approval. The notice of public hearing for the self-haul permit fee was advertised in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin on June 23 and 24, 2011. FISCAL IMPACT Staff time will be spent on processing the permit, and reviewing the semi-annual reports with the accompanying weight tickets. It is estimated that this will take approximately 1.5 hours per application, and a $50 annual permit fee is recommended to cover the staff and administrative costs related to the self-haul permit. Resp dully u fitted, ~, -~-~: Mark A. Steuer Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer MAS/LC:Is P231 RESOLUTION NO. ~~ //,3 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING A SELF-HAUL PERMIT FEE PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS AND AUTHORITY OF CHAPTER 8.17 AND CHAPTER 8.19 OF TITLE 8 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE A. Recitals. 1. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga previously adopted Ordinance 838 establishing aself-haul permit fee arising, directly or indirectly, under said legislation be adopted pursuant to resolution, and thereafter, be amended from time to time by resolution. 2. City staff conducted a comprehensive survey of this fee in other cities that reflect the reasonable and prudent costs relating to the administration of a self-haul trash permit to customers and are recommending that the City Council adopt the recommended fee. This fee does not present the City an opportunity to achieve profits or to impose charges in excess of the costs reasonably related to the administration of the permit. The City Council has directed City staff to regularly review the operations of the self-haul permit program to ensure that the fee is sufficient to cover all prudent business costs, but not exceeding the amount necessary for the same. The fee reflects the reasonable costs to the City only and does not reflect any excess rates, fees, or charges that are in excess of the reasonable costs of administering the permit as set forth hereinafter. 3. All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby find and resolve as follows: Section 1. The facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A of this Resolution, are true and correct. Section 2. A Self-Haul Permit fee of $50.00 be established and paid annually to the City from each Self-Haul Permit applicant. Section 3. This Resolution shall become effective with its adoption. Section 4. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. SI ~~1SdW ~aaw6u3 ~C;!0lsao!n~aS 6uuaaui6u~ }o ~o;oa~ia Cana;S y ~{~eW pa;;i n ~Iln dsad ;!woad Iney-}las ay; o; pa;e~a~ s;soo ani;e~;s!u!wpe pue }}e;s ay; ~anoo o; papuawwooa~ si as};iw~ad lenuue 05$ e pue 'uoi;eoildde gad sanoy 5~ ~ ~(~a;ew!xo~dde a~{e; Minn siy; ;ey; pa;ew!;sa s! ;I ~s;a~{oi~ ;y6!aM 6u!~(uedwoooe ay; y;!nn s~oda~ lenuue-iwas ayl 6uinnaina~ pue ';!woad ay; 6uissaao~d uo ;uads aq ~I!M aw!; }fie;S l~t/dWl ~d~Sld • L lOZ 'bZ PUe £Z aunp uo u!;alln8 ~i1ea ~(al~ell puelul ay; u! pasi~anpe seen aa} ;!woad Iney-}las ay; ~o} 6uueay oiignd }o ao!;ou ayl ~~eno~dde ~iouno0 ~o} aa} ay; papuawwooa~ as;;iwwoo ooH Pb ayl ~ ~ 60Z '8 aunt uo as;;iwwo0 ooy py 6uidwna le6alll pue ~ana~ ao!n~aS asn}ad ay; o; uo!;epuawwooa~ aa} ;iw~ad pue s6uipui} I~anJnS ay; pa;uasa~d }}e;g ;iw~ad Iney-}has yoea ssaooad o; .t~essaoau awi; }}e;s ay; ~anoo o; papuawwooa~ si 05~ }o aa} ;iwaad lenuue uy ~s~oda~ pa~!nba~ ay; ~t;uan pue Ma!na~ os~e pue uo!;eo!Idde ;!woad yoea nnaina~ o; s~noy 5~ ~ ~(la;ew!xo~dde axle; plnonn ;! ;ey; sa;ewi;sa }}e;g ~yse~; }o lesodsip ~ado~d 6ui;uawnoop s;d!aoa~ ~(I~{aann apnlou! plnonn ;ey; ~ea~( gad s}~oda~ onn; ;!wgns 'panadde }! `pue uo!;eo!Idde ue a;aldwoo o; ssau!snq ~o ;uap!sa~ a saa!nbaa ;iwaad IneH-}~aS e6uowean0 oyoued{ }o ~(;!~ ayl 's;uawa~!nba~ 6u~~oda~ p!p se `~(;!o /~q pauen pa6~eyo aa} ayl ~aa};!woad Iney-}las a pa6~eyo osle pue ;!woad Iney-}las a a~!nba~ ;ey; sa!;!~edio!unw day;o }o ~tan~ns anisuaya~dwoo e pa;onpuoo }}e;S ~aa};!woad Iney-}las ay; ys!~ge;sa o; pano~dde aq ;snw uo!;nlosa~ a 'aoueu!p~o ay; gad ~aa~;iw~ad lenuue ue r(ed pue 'uoi;ed!Idde ue a;aldwoo 'sauilap!n6 o!~!oads;aaw ~(ay; pap~noad 'yse~; ~-ay; Iney-}las o; sassauisnq ao s;uap!sa~ snnolle ;ey; uo!sino~d ;uaw~ted ll,o;epuew ay; o; uo!;daoxa ue sapn~ou! aoueulpao ayl ~~(;i0 ay; u! sassauisnq pue. s;uapisa~ y;oq ~(q aoln~as yse~; }o ;uawr(ed r(~o;epuew 6ulys!lge;sa `l. ~pZ `g lady uo 88g ~oN aoueuip~0 pano~dde I!ouno0 ~(;i0 SISA~b`Nb' /aNf10aJ~i~dB ~apo0 ~edio!unW eSuoweon0 oyoued ay; }o g al}!1 }0 6 L'8 ~a;dey0 pue L ~'g ~a;dey0 }o ~(;!aoy;ne pue s;uawa~!nba~ ay; o; ;uensmd aa} ;!woad Iney-}lase 6uiys!Ige;sa e6uoweon0 oyoued }o ~(;!0 ay; }o l!ouno0 ~(;i0 ay; }o uo!;n~osa~ a }o leno~dde ay; puawwooa~l N0llb'aN~WW00db 3000 gbdIOIN(1W bONOWb0(10 OHONbd 3H1 d0 8 31111 dO 6~ 8 d~1dbH0 aNb L6~8 d31dbH0 d0 .111dOHlflb aNb S1N3W3dif1D3d 3H1 Ol 1NbflSdfld 3d~ 11Wd3d ~f1bH-d~3S b JNIHS1~8b1S3 `bIN2~Odlgb0 'bJNOWb0(10 OH~Nbd d0 J.110 3Hl d0 ~10Nf100 J.110 3H1 d0 N0Ilf1~OS32~ b dO gb'/10bddb' ~~oa~gnS ~a6euelN swe~6ad le;uawuainu~ 'sollega0 epu!~ :/;8 aaau!6ud ,(;!0/sao!n.Iag 6uuaaui6u3 }o ~o;oa~!Q '~ana;S 'b' ~{~eW :woad ~a6euellll ~;!0 'd01b 'wed ~loe~ ~iouno0 r(;i0 ay; }o s~agwaW pue ~o~teW :ol ~'JNOW'd~fl~ OH~N~'~ L lOZ `9 ~Inf ~a;ed ~~~ .L~i~1~.L2IF"d3Q S3JI.12I3S `J~\R;33:~iIJ~~1.~ 0£Zd •(£1,~-~~ •oN uognlosa~J •apo0ledlorunyy e~6uouaeon0 oyoued ay; ~o g allll ~0 66 •g lalde40 pue L ~ ~g ~a}de40 ~o ~(;uoylne pue s~uawaalnbar ayj of luens~nd aa~ ;lw~ad IneH alas a 6u/ysllgelsa `eluro~ge0 `e6uoweon0 oyoued so ~r0 ayl }o ~~ouno0 ~i}10 aye ~o uol~nlosa~ a ~o uor;eaaprsuo0 ~ ~oz `9 ~Inf II~Nf10~ ul~ - 32lI~ - Ha21 'zo :wa~~ m m ~ °~ m~ ~ T m ~ O C ~ c aTir °~~ -° E U _ nm ~~ ~ a~ ~ c ~ N _ O _ O N ~~Ea~Z3aci~'c~ ° rn >i C C N ~ ~°' ~ o coow c O 7 ym m m ici "ov Omj a c n c N ? (~ N w d E NUS 'O - ~ m N N L E ~rj _ O ~ N ~ ~ -O i a O C d~ N O N >. O CL T T 9 7 O N N ~ ~> C L O . . O 7 ~ N C O ~~ ~- U N= m TN N CL~~- ~ N a) ~ c m _ m U ~ ~ ~ L V ~ O7 N C ~ ~ ~ O. U O ~ E = y ~ 7 ~ 0° m c'o . N~ ~ N ~ ~ ~_ O dZQN°ENrnm m E '> m `~ O7 ~ N L ' ~ (~ O C N ' ~ N p~ m w ~ N y ~~ `y ~ N~ y U N O >. U C B ~ 0 00 7 ~ a N C '- 'O m N m O_ '- ~ i C L L C O. _ N~~~ U m~ N U O C ~ ... U a > a C O E N C 7 V ~ ~~ 7 0~ N L U N ( 9 ~ C ~ ~+ '~ 7 ~ E ` ° N a~ m ~ ~ = o ~ m 3 m a~ m° x E Y N ~ O N M m 'O O) Y E C ~= d O O~ N N N N y O ~ m ~ O O O) C ~ j O~ 7 N (? N T N j p Q ~ "O U 'p C C L N NL. m~ U N N z d wUma~U~ c~ L.. 3d d 0 -~~0 ~F3~~OO-~~- .N+ O O « >` N ~ N w (0 N m m~ w N N C -N "' N tmiiUYL p N N O > w~O ~ O ... p ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a N E~ N L N N ~ N~~ l6 N U N 7 N ~ L ~~ 7 N m N c o ~ ~ o N -'o ff a- ~ 3 3 - c m r m No m m c' U ~Q ~~ y c o »- ~ C N ° ~ a c d E° m ~ m a c w t ~ o ~ '~ ' °~ o > 3 a o N a~ `° E N m m ~ L o ~ a~ O - ~ ~ O N a~ C "O a~ ~ O).N c T U N V d .,. ' N r ~. m N O C N . ~ C ... 3 m~ N N O C N j~ U C ~O Y~ L~ L j m ~a c - N "_ 33 c U~E~ ~-0 ~ aM~a i ag o i > mv ~ >, N ~ ~ E~ a i 3Y 3 N O U N~~ 7 7 C a ~m m L N N N C N ~ 01 C N - m 0 7 3 C O m C C T N L U~ N O C C a r N p~ 3 N~ N~ ~~ E m 0) B T U O` O J C ,O-~(0 N >.~ N C ~ w~ ~~ O h N ~ m C U O 7 U 0 .TJ ~ 'C C p~ N ~ N N ~ U w~ > N O m O Oa m a ° 7 m oY o c a O m 7 = m N Nc~~ m_w U ` ~~ a ° air oLO~ T rn ~ ' o. v o 7 U a~ `o.° ° N o ~ ~ ao ~ c a~ ~ ~ ~ ~otSv ~ c~ a ~ ~ E ?`N m a i= ~ ~ N 3 ~ c - o o m a a~ > mU o t m °.~ ` O o w N~ E . > >~ ~ o O aTriU~w ` ~ m o ° ,~ -o-o ~ -o-o U> ~ N ~ O i a U l~6 ~ m = (0 .N ~ N L ~ C N O p 'C ' ... m O. N ' "N" > N C ~ S] ~ O) N >L "- ~ -o Sa 3.5 ° wN -m ~ ~ c m ~ ~ ~ > a o a ~ • o m-Q? N c oa E'a Q ~ m ~ ~ x ~ m ~ ~ ~ m La ~ ~ m m ° ~ °~ L ` o o r m > ~~ ~ ~ m o w ~ ~ ~ O aa~ a p ~ o l- m -o .L~ E. ow:. 0 a Ed 3 E r a~ NCV °~ ori w ti a~ w ~ ~ m L~ m ° o m E N ~ °~ ' ' ~ N ; ; O O U C O Y ~ m 3 N ~` . 'E N c'm `o in ~ Ew aNi ~ c `m ~-~ 3 Z a~ 7 ~ o~° . v C ~ . m O w _ ~ ~ O U ~ N O N~ N a m T > O - O m N .~ 7~ '- ~ " > C p7 3 ~ L -O O N a U O w O N n ~' m O N - C~ ~ m ~~ O (U nUS ~`' U ~ ~6 p dL C C ~ _ ~N 7 m m y ' C N C . O ~~ a.N - N 7 m N N 0 . C C ` C x N V N N C ~ w N ~- ~ C p C T ~ N O m N~ ~ N N ~ N o m > j N ..-~ p ~ ' ~ m - w N O N d O ? 01 ~ .C C C m N N w ~ O- 3 m O C N N ~ C O ~ L ~ N U . ~ N ~`p d LL N C' N 7 C O Z O ~ O L 7 ~ E C N~ O U ~ N EA O L N ffl m 2] T d O C m ..~ _.~ N w U f- T N C O c0 m ~ C t w c o m ~ fA U t N N N T ~ C 3 z° O ° ~ O N O N N N N ~ ~ Q ~ y r 3 O ~, r o U ~ c N o. ~ m z O ~ V O A O m O O >' 3 _T ~ _T C _T _T ~ z a a O U J a a U Z H W a J a LL J W P230-1 r 0 N O m L U m m n E ui m r~ m m o a` ~ N O ~ N ~ N d ~ ~ C_ O_ ~ ~ U C N U C L C U N ~ C ~ C (0 (0 'p O N O 'O > T O a a L ~ O_ U N ~ ~ U "' C ~~ ° O N O ati ~v i O a ~ ~ ~ Z o ~ ~a oa w c r ti v7i >'' ~` E o c 0o mm.N d C U .~ ac -L-p m o = > U ~ V w .-. f0 C . ~ 7 a~ Y `L„ 7 N U m N N ~ 3 w o ~ Z ~ (0 (U (~U y L 7 N N ~' O r 'J C .D . U T N a~3mZ ~ ~ w p ~ ~ N O N = N N N ~~m O E ~ ~ o ~ ~ m 7 (0 O O ~ W C` U O C N N C U N N N N (vj 7 O ~ O C "O O Z v> ~ m N Oc E ~ m o o m a m ~ E m ~ 7 m--o - U C U O (p ~ N O ~ O O 'n p n N O O_N QO N Z m ~ m Z } (0 C O O U ~ w 0 w 0 _T _T > U U~ Z O N Q a O U J Q a U 2 H W a J Q J W P230-2 N O N O M L U f6 U (6 a Q P230-3 Mapnr L. DLNNIS M~cHAeL • Mn~ror Pro Tent SAM SPAGNOLO Cotnr, it A~i9ulies WILLIAM J. ALEXANDL'R, CHUCK BUQUET, DIANE WILLIAMS CityMn,mgrr~ACK LAA1~ A]CP 'SHE 'li1TY OF RANCHO Ct1CAMONGA ~ANCHO IG'UCAMONGA Notice of Public Hearing -Refuse Collection Rates Notice is hereby given that a public hearing concerning revisions to residential and commercial refuse hauling rates has been scheduled for the 17`h day of August, 2011, at 7:OOpm in the Council Chambers of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. The current and proposed rates are available for review in the Office of the City Clerk during regular business hours: Monday through Thursday, from 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. The proposed increases are based upon and necessitated by increase in the Consumer Price Index, materials processing, and increased disposal costs. At the public hearing, the City Council shall consider all protests against the proposed rates. Written protests must be received in the City Clerk's office no later than 6:OOpm, August 16, 2011. Further information may be obtained by contacting the City of Rancho Cucar,0onga, California at 909-477-2740 extension 4062. vn.ivay, ,vuv,~. City Clerk/Records Manager Dated: (n-o?`i-ll June 29, 2011 10500 Civic Centrr Dc • I'.O. Bux A07 • Rancho Cucamonga, CA )1729-OXOi • Ti] OUO) 477-?7UU • Fax (909) 477-2X49 • www.CipofRC.us P230-4 EXHIBIT A CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PROPOSED RATE INCREASE Curren[ Proposed Service Tvoe Rate Rate Residential Service Standard $ 20.99 $ 21.88 Senior $ 14.06 $ 14.66 Multi-Family-per unit $ 19.99 $ 20.88 Extra Trash Barrel $ 6.25 $ 6.81 Extra Recycling Barrel $ 1.25 $ 1.37 Green Waste Barrel $ 3.25 $ 3.54 Backyard/Pull-Out Service $ 41.98 $ 45.37 Extra Pick-Up $ 18.00 $ 19.45 Residential Single 8Multi-Family Bin Service Size Freq 3 1 $ 116.46 $ 142.37 3 2 $ 182.43 $ 229.80 3 3 $ 248.42 $ 317.25 3 4 $ 314.41 $ 404.72 3 5 $ 380.65 $ 492.46 3 6 $ 445.74 $ 578.94 Temporary Bins $ 91.00 $ 98.94 Temporary Bins - Extra Pick-Up $ 91.00 $ 98.94 Recvclinq Bins Size Freq 3 1 $ 48.13 $ - 3 2 $ 62.97 $ - 3 3 $ 109.90 $ - 3 4 $ 138.04 $ - 3 5 $ 165.41 $ - 3 6 $ 193.76 $ - Green Waste Bins Size Freq 3 1 $ 126.10 $ 141.41 3 2 $ 194.77 $ 220.34 3 3 $ 264.05 $ 299.92 3 4 $ 332.93 $ 379.10 3 5 $ 401.77 $ 458.20 3 6 $ 471.20 $ 537.98 Food Waste bins Size Freq 3 1 $ 164.95 $ 168.72 3 2 $ 308.93 $ 314.96 3 3 $ 433.55 $ 441.85 3 4 $ 557.78 $ 568.34 3 5 $ 681.93 $ 694.76 3 6 $ 806.75 $ 821.85 Roll-Off (Trash) 10 yard $ 505.14 $ 539.81 20 yard $ 505.14 $ 539.81 40 yard $ 505.14 $ 539.81 40 yard compactor $ 749.47 $ 785.55 Relocation Fee $ 54.28 $ 59.04 Rental Fee (per day after 7 days) N/A $ 24.46 Roll-Off (Recvclinq) 10 yard - C8D $ 200.88 $ 218.49 40 yard -Recycling $ 157.40 $ 171.20 40 yard -Recycling Compactor $ 157.40 $ 171.20 40 yard -Wood/Green Was[e $ 157.40 $ 171.20 Relocation Fee $ 54.28 $ 59.04 Rental Fee (per day after 7 days) N/A $ 24.46 Current Proposed Rate Rate ~h Barrel N/A $ 26.25 ycling Barrel N/A $ - 1.5 1 $ 94.75 $ 106.53 1.5 2 $ 140.52 $ 159.80 1.5 3 $ 185.39 $ 212.08 2 1 $ 106.49 $ 120.43 2 2 $ 163.13 $ 186.66 2 3 $ 220.04 $ 253.17 3 1 $ 129.10 $ 147.36 3 2 $ 200.80 $ 232.30 3 3 $ 273.08 $ 317.86 3 4 $ 344.97 $ 403.00 3 5 $ 416.84 $ 488.13 3 6 $ 489.28 $ 573.87 4 1 $ 151.44 $ 173.98 4 2 $ 242.16 $ 281.91 4 3 $ 332.68 $ 389.62 4 4 $ 423.12 $ 497.27 4 5 $ 513.57 $ 604.89 4 6 $ 604.24 $ 712.78 6 1 $ 182.47 $ 212.34 6 2 $ 309.58 $ 364.46 6 3 $ 436.68 $ 516.58 6 4 $ 564.04 $ 668.97 6 5 $ 691.13 $ 821.08 6 6 $ 818.18 $ 973.14 ize Freq 3 1 $ 197. 21 $ 245 .54 3 2 $ 308. 33 $ 397 .45 3 3 $ 420. 33 $ 550 .30 3 4 $ 531. 74 $ 702 .51 3 5 $ 643. 09 $ 854 .67 3 6 $ 755. 35 $ 1,007 .82 4 1 $ 232. 06 $ 293 .83 4 2 $ 372. 72 $ 488 .19 4 3 $ 513. 25 $ 682 .43 4 4 $ 653. 66 $ 876 .56 4 5 $ 794. 08 $ 1,070 .67 4 6 $ 934. 60 $ 1,264 .91 6 1 $ 297. 40 $ 385 .59 6 2 $ 499. 03 $ 666 .97 6 3 $ 700. 53 $ 948 .24 6 4 $ 901. 93 $ 1,229 .40 6 5 $ 1,103. 34 $ 1,510 .55 6 6 $ 1,304. 84 $ 1,791 .82 a Pick-Up (bin) $ 38.00 $ 41.07 a Pick-Up (compactor) $ 76.00 $ 82.14 opper Rental $ 35.00 $ 37.83 ;ing Bin $ 10.00 $ 10.61 Out Service 0-25 ft N/C 26-50 ft 1x $ 35.00 $ 38.07 26-50 ft 2x $ 70.00 $ 76.14 26-50 ft 3x $ 105.00 $ 114.21 Over 50 ft 1 x $ 70.00 $ 76.14 Over 50 ft 2x $ 140.00 $ 152.28 Over 50 ft 3x $ 210.00 $ 228.42 Over 50 ft 4x $ 280.00 $ 304.56 Over 50 ft 5x $ 350.00 $ 380.70 y Items (in excess of 4 collection/5 items per collection' charge $ 30.00 $ 30.00 item charge $ 11.00 $ 11.00 P231 RESOLUTION NO. /~ //,3 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING A SELF-HAUL PERMIT FEE PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS AND AUTHORITY OF CHAPTER 8.17 AND CHAPTER 8.19 OF TITLE 8 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE A. Recitals. 1. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga previously adopted Ordinance 838 establishing aself-haul permit fee arising, directly or indirectly, under said legislation be adopted pursuant to resolution, and thereafter, be amended from time to, time by resolution. 2. City staff conducted a comprehensive survey of this fee in other cities that reflect the reasonable and prudent costs relating to the administration of a self-haul trash permit to customers and are recommending- that the City Council adopt the recommended fee. This fee does not present the City an opportunity to achieve profits or to impose charges in excess of the costs reasonably related to the administration of the permit. The City Council has directed City staff to regularly review the operations of the self-haul permit program to ensure that the fee is sufficient to cover all prudent business costs, but not exceeding the amount necessary for the same. The fee reflects the reasonable costs to the City only and does not reflect any eiccess rates, fees, or charges that are in excess of the reasonable costs of administering the permit as set forth hereinafter. 3. All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby find and resolve as follows: Section 1. The facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A of this Resolution, are true and correct. Section 2. A Self-Haul Permit fee of $50.00 be established and paid annually to the City from each Self-Haul Permit applicant. Section 3. This Resolution shall become effective with its adoption. Section 4. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. STAFF REPORT P232 l~a-1NCHO CUCr1MONG.~ FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT RANCHO Date: July 6, 2011 C,UCAMONGA To: President and Members of the Board of Directors Jack Lam, A.I.C.P., City Manager From: Mike Bell, Fire Chief By: Ingrid Bruce, GIS/Special Districts Manager Janet Walker, Management Analyst II Subject: APPROVAL TO SET ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX LEVY LEVY FOR MELLO-ROOS COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1 (CFD NO. 85-1) FOR FISCAL YEAR 2011/12 RECOMIViENDATION It is recommended that the Fire Board adopt the attached Resolution setting the annual special tax levy for Mello-Roos Community Facilities District No. 85-1 for Fiscal Year 2011/12. Pursuant to the provisions of the Mello-Roos Facilities Act of 1982, the Fire Board is authorized to annual levy the tax rate for fire protection services. BACKGROUND On December 10, 1985, the qualified voters approved the formation of Mello-Roos Community Facilities District No. 85-1 and authorized the District to annually levy a special tax to provide for fire protection services. The special tax is necessary to provide the required operation and maintenance revenue specific to ongoing fire protection and life safety services within the CFD. This voter approved Mello-Roos CFD and associated special tax was first initiated in FY 1986!87. At the time that CFD No. 85-1 was formed, the Mello-Roos Act provided that the Board of Directors, acting as the legislative body of CFD No. 85-1, may, by ordinance, levy the special taxes at the rate and apportion such special taxes in the manner specified in the Rate and Method. Each year since CFD No. 85-1 was formed the Board of Directors has adopted an ordinance to levy-the special taxes within CFD No. 85-1. The Mello-Roos Act has subsequently been amended to provide that the legislative body of a community facilities district may initially provide for the levy of a special tax by ordinance and through the enactment of such ordinance provide, by resolution, for the levy of the special tax in the current or future tax years. On May 18, 2011, an ordinance was introduced authorizing the levy of special taxes within Community Facilities District No. 85-1 by resolution rather than by ordinance. The ordinance was adopted and became effective July 1, 2011. ARIALYSIS As required by the specific language of CFD 85-1, the proposed special tax rate for fiscal year 2011/12 has been adjusted in accordance with the lesser of: (a) changes in cost of living (CPI); or (b) changes in cost of living and changes in population as defined in Section 7901 of the, Government Code. Changes in cost of living (CPI) for 2011/12 is calculated at 1.0251 or 2.51% APPROVAL TO SET ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX LEVY LEVY FOR MELLO-ROOS PAGE 2 COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1 (CFD NO. 85-1) FOR FISCAL YEAR . 2011/12 JULY 6, 2011 while changes in per capita cost of living and changes in populatioh resulted in a calculation of 1.044269 or 4.43%. This year's calculation utilizes the lesser of the twoucalculations, the per capita cost of living (CPI) of 1.0251 or 2.51 %. The proposed special tax levy rate for Fiscal Year 2011/12 is listed below: FISCAL RESIDENTIAL YEAR DWELLINGS 2010/11 $148.00 per DU Proposed 2011/12 $151.71 per DU COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES $148.00 per AC + .080 SF $151.71 per AC + .082 SF INDUSTRIAL PROPERTIES $148.00 per AC + .098 SF $151.71 per AC + .100 SF This adjustment will result in a projected revenue increase of approximately $193,460. The increase for residential is $3.71 per dwelling unit and commercial/industrial is $3.71 per acre plus $.002 per square foot of building. CFD 85-1 generates sufficient revenue to cover all incurred expenses without infusion from the Fire District General Fund. The CFD 85-1 budget is balanced without the use of reserve funds. Exhibit "A" of the proposed and attached resolution sets forth the rate and method of apportionment for the special tax to be levied in Fiscal Year 2011/12. The maximum special tax which could be levied is illustrated in Exhibit "B" of the Resolution, utilizing the State of California, Department of Finance Per Capita Cost of Living Change. During the budget workshop held on May 26, 2011, the proposed CFD No. 85-1 budget was reviewed by the Board. Respectfully submitted, r~~~~~ f '', r !%"' Mike Bell Fire Chief Attachments: 1. Resolution 2. Annual Report 3. Map P233 /~ P234 RESOLUTION NO. FD 11- ~ z 9 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING THE ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2011/12 WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, California, (formerly Foothill Fire Protection District, hereinafter referred to as the "legislative body"), (a) initiated proceedings in 1985 to (i) form the Foothill Fire Protection District Community Facilities District No. 85-1 ("CFD No. 85-1 ") and (ii) authorize the levy of special taxes within CFD No. 85-1; (b) held a public hearing regarding the foregoing and formed CFD No. 85-1; and (c) conducted an election on December 10, 1985 and more than two-thirds (2/3) of the qualified electors voted in favor of a proposition authorizing the levy of special taxes in CFD No. 85-1, all as authorized pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982," being Chapter 2.5, Part 1, Division 2, Title 5 of -the Government Code of the State of California (the "Act"); and WHEREAS, this legislative body, by ordinance, as authorized by Section 53340 of the Government Code of the State of California, has authorized the annual levy of a special tax to pay for costs and expenses related to said community facilities district at the rate and apportion the special tax in the manner specified in the resolution adopted pursuant to Article 2 (commencing with Section 53318 of the Government Code), except that this Board of Directors may levy the special tax at a lower rate; and WHEREAS, this Board of Directors desires to levy a special tax in the Community Facilities District for the fiscal year 2011/12. NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District does hereby resolve, determine and order as follows: SECTION 1: Levy of Special Tax. That the specific rate and amount of the special tax to be collected to pay for the costs and expenses for the next fiscal year (2011/12) for the referenced District is hereby determined and established as set forth in the attached, referenced and incorporated Exhibit "A". SECTION 2: Exempt Properties. That properties or entities of the State, Federal or other local governments shall be exempt from such special tax. SECTION 3: Use of Special Tax. That the proceeds of the special tax shall be used to pay, in whole or in part, the costs of the following, in the following order of priority: P235 (a) The construction, ~ acquisition, expansion and/or rehabilitation of public facilities, within or for the benefit of the Community Facilities District generally described as follows: Fire protection and suppression facilities and appurtenances, including; equipment, real property and other tangible property with an estimated useful life of five years or longer. (b) The services to be provided within the Community Facilities District are generally described as follows: The performance by employees of functions, operations and maintenance and repair activities in order to provide fire protection within the Community Facilities District. (c) The repayment of advances and loans. The special tax shall be used solely for the purposes specified above and for no other purpose. SECTION 4: Annual Adjustment in Maximum Special Tax. Pursuant to authorization of the qualified electorate, this Board of Directors hereby declares that it shall annually adjust the maximum special tax based upon the lesser of: (a) changes in cost of living; or (b) changes in cost of living and changes in population as defined in Section 7901 of the Government Code occurring within the Community Facilities District in the immediately preceding fiscal year. SECTION 5: Collection of Special Tax. The special tax shall be collected in the same manner as ordinary ad valorem property taxes are collected, and shall be subject to the same penalties and same procedure and sale in cases of any delinquency for ad valorem taxes. Resolution No. FD 11- -Page 2 of 5 P236 PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this day of July, 2011 AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: L. Dennis Michael, President ATTEST: Janice C. Reynolds, Secretary i, JANICE C. ,REYNOLDS, SECRETARY of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, at a regular meeting of said Board held on the day of July 2011. Executed this day of July 2011 at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Janice C. Reynolds, Secretary Resolution No. FD 11- -Page 3 of 5 P237 EXHIBIT "A" SPECIAL TAX FOR FISCAL YEAR 2011/12 IN MELLO-RODS COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1 RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT STRUCTURES Residential Multi-family 2 DU 3 DU 4 DU 5-14 DU 15-30 DU 31-80 DU 81 - up DU ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX ($151.71) per DU 1.75 ($151.71) 2.25 ($151.71) 2.65 ($451.71) 2.65 ($151.71) + {.35 (TU - 4) ($151.71)} 6.15 ($151.71) + {.30 (TU - 14) ($151.71)} 10.65 ($151.71) + {.25 (TU - 30) ($151.71)} 23.15 ($151.71) + {.20 (TU - 80) ($151.71)} Commercial ($151.71) per acre + $.082 per SF Industrial ($151.71) per acre + $.100 per SF NOTE: DU =Dwelling Unit TU =Total Units SF =Square Foot Reduction Commercial and industrial structures shall be granted a .01 cent reduction in the Special Tax for the installation of complete sprinkler systems. In addition, multi-floor commercial and industrial structures shall also be granted a .01 cent reduction (not cumulative) in Special Tax for each separate floor above or below the main ground floor of the structure. ti Resolution No. FD 11- -Page 4 of 5 P238 EXHIBIT "B" MAXIMUM SPECIAL TAX FOR MELLO-ROOS COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1 IN FISCAL YEAR 2011/12 RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT PER CAPITA COST MAXIMUM SPECIAL TAX OF LIVING CHANGE 2010/2011 BASE FOR 2011/12 1.0251 STRUCTURES Residential Multi-Family Commercial Industrial $148.00 DU $151.71 DU MAXIMUM ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX ($151.71) per DU 2 DU: 1.75 ($151.71) 3 DU: 2.25 ($151.71) 4 DU: 2.65 ($151.71) 5-14 DU: 2.65 ($151.71) + {.35 (TU - 4)($151.71)} 15-30 DU: 6.15 ($151.71) + {.30 (TU - 14)($151.71)} 31-80 DU: 10.65 ($151.71) + {.25 (TU - 30)($151.71)} 81-up DU: 23.15 ($151.71) + {.20 (TU - 80)($151.71)} ($151.71) per acre + .082per SF ($151.71) per acre + .100 per SF NOTE: DU =Dwelling Unit TU =Total Units SF =Square Foot Reduction Commercial and industrial structures shall be granted a .01 cent reduction in the Special Tax for the installation of complete sprinkler systems. In addition, multi-floor commercial and industrial structures shall also be granted a .01 cent reduction (not cumulative) in Special Tax for each separate floor above or below the main ground floor of the structure. Resolution No. FD 11- -Page 5 of 5 P239 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT MELLO-ROOS COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1 ANNUAL STATUS REPORT Resolution No. JULY 2011 P240 BACKGROUND On December 10, 1985, the electors within the boundary of Community Facilities District No. 85-1 the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District (formerly Foothill Fire Protection District, the "District") voted in favor of a proposition to authorize the levy of a special tax for fire suppression services and facilities, to establish an appropriations limit and to annually adjust the special tax and appropriations limit based upon changes in the cost of living and changes in population. The district is bounded generally on the north by the 210 Freeway, on the east by Etiwanda Ave. on the south by Fourth Street and on the west by Archibald Avenue. The maximum Special Tax shall be annually adjusted for (a) changes in cost of living (CPI); or (b) changes in the cost of living and chariges in population as defined in Section 7901 of the Government Code, as amended, whichever is lesser. FISCAL YEAR 2011/2012 The change in the CPI for Fiscal Year 2011-2012 is 1.0251 or 2.51%. P241 FISCAL YEAR 2011/2012 STRUCTURES RESIDENTIAL ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX 151.71 PER DU MULTI-FAMILY 2DU: 3DU: 4DU: 5-14 DU: 15-30 DU: 31-80 DU: 81-UP DU: COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL 1.75($151.71) 2.25($151.71) 2.65($151.71) 2.65($151.71) + {.35(TU-4) (151.71)} 6.15($151.71) + {.30(TU-14) (151.71)} 10.65($151.71) + {.25(TU-30) (151.71)} 23.15($151.71) + {.20(TU-80) (151.71)} ($151.71)per acre + $.082 per sq ft. ($151.71)per acre + $.100 per sq ft. Resolution No. P242 Resolution No. COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT PROPOSED USES AND SOURCES OF FUNDS USES: PERSONNEL DEVELOPMENT $ 458,390.00 FIRE ADMINISTRATION, $1,206,140.00 OTHER SERVICES $4,745,740.00 DELINQUENT ASSESSMENTS $ 0.00 $6,410,270.00 SOURCES: INTEREST REVENUE $ 51,540.00 DELINQUENCIES $ 118,570.00 FEES $ 3,000.00 REIMBURSEMENTS $ 10,000.00 , SPECIAL TAX $6.227,160.00 $6,410;270.00 P243 ~O '~ V ~~ `1V .y 0 `I.+ •~ • ~, V Q c 0 ~_ 1 I I 1 ny epuenn!~~ i i ~8 ~aa~~ ep ~.._.._.._.._.._.._..-i ny ~a}sayoo~ P" .~ ny ua~!II!W i i i i ny uaneH r- i ny esow~aH i i ny pleq!4oaf/ !'- i i ny ueuallaH i 1 i i ~g ue!lauae~ i ~.._.._ i ~..~ ti ~.. ~..~ ~/.~~.~- ~ ~ N j, N m ;`?,~°z ~~ v °- 1 L, ~}, ~ ~ U 2 ~~ T 0 0 ~ N ~ _ O J m ~ N = m O o u_ Q ~..~.. ~ti a--, . 1 nd ~Se~ UJ ®~ - ~~ i ~_ ',~ r., ~ ~: w` ,~ ny epueMg~ ny as}sayoo~ ny ua~!II!W ny uaneH °w •~~ ny esoua~aH nb' Pleq!4o~`d ® ~~. ~~~ ny ueu~IlaH :~• ~ v ny p e~(au!n GAS -os S~eEvcm~E_..gc >ea~a ~~ Sim ~.. ..7 a~.q.=a~A ~~~=° "o t. Ao~w~oo~~oas ~ N r rte-, o ~ N `A~""` °an,€& qc"6 ~~q u -~ ale _am~R ~~.E~p"E'C a`~ak ~~ea~g~°g~e~ ~fl ~9 .~~~rP~D ~~~ ff Ad ogeg-o .gt~~9 `~°8''~~ ~ ~~~ ear B;E e=-"~ p a~£p&erge"'x E mU Y „y` V ~ yU -'t-`otl 9~- g! F~Ym naFe`a~uE .~ ~ J Q U ~ U ~ ~..~ •~~ J ~ ~ STAFF REPORT IL-1NCH0 CUC.-1MONG~~ FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Date: July 6, 2011 To: President and Members of the Board of Directors Jack Lam, A.I.C.P., City Manager From: Mike Bell, Fire Chief By: Ingrid Bruce, GIS/Special Districts Manager Janet Walker, Management Analyst II RANCHO C,UCAMONGA APPROVAL TO SET ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX LEVY FOR MELLO-ROOS COMMUNITY Subject: FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-1 (CFD NO. 88-1) FOR FISCAL YEAR 2011/12 RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Fire board adopt the attached Resolution setting the annual special tax levy for Mello-Roos Community Facilities District No. 88-1 for Fiscal Year 2011/12. Pursuant to the provisions of the Mello-Roos Facilities Act of 1982, the Fire Board. is authorized to annually levy the tax rate for fire protection services. BACKGROUND On April 4, 1989, the qualified voters approved the formation of Mello-Roos Community Facilities District No. 88-1 and authorized the District to annually levy a special tax to provide for fire protection services within northeast Etiwanda. On May 19, 1989, the Board adopted an Ordinance authorizing the annual levy of a special tax in CFD 88-1. The Ordinance authorized the District, by Resolution, to annually levy the special tax for purposes of land acquisition, fire station construction, purchase of equipment and operations and maintenance costs for fire protection services. This voter approved CFD and associated special tax was first initiated in Fiscal Year 1989/90. Fiscal Year 2011/12 is the twenty-third (23rd) consecutive year the District has levied a special tax to provide required revenues for capital improvements (land, fire station facility, equipment) and fire protection services (personnel, operations and maintenance (O&M)) within this CFD. Accordingly, the Fiscal Year 2011/12 budget includes fully burdened personnel costs associated with existing memorandums of understanding between the District and its bargaining units as well as all related operations and maintenance costs, and capital improvements. ANALYSIS To determine the adjustment for Fiscal Year 2011/12, staff utilized the May 2011 State of California, Department of Finance Price and Population Change for Special Districts. Two calculations were reviewed; (a) change in the per capita personal income (CPI); and (b) changes in per capita personal income and changes in population. The CPI for 2011/12 is calculated at 1.0251 or 2.51 % while the changes in per capital personal income and changes in population resulted in a calculation of 1.044269 or 4.43%. Staff is proposing an adjustment of 1.0251 or 2.51 %, the lesser of the two calculations, above the 201.0/11 tax levy. This will result in a projected revenue increase of approximately $12,520. The increase will range from $4.32 P244 P245 APPROVAL TO SET ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX LEVY FOR MELLO-ROOS COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-1 (CFD NO. 88-1) FOR FISCAL YEAR 2011/12 JULY 6, 2011 to $11.34 for residents based on residential square footage. The commercial/industrial will increase $17.45 per acre plus $.002 per square foot of building. There is no change on the vacant property rate. Expenditures in CFD 88-1 will increase approximately $71,000 in FY 2011/12. The proposed fiscal year special tax levy will cover only a portion of the ongoing personnel and fire station O&M costs within the CFD. The CFD will receive approximately $633,000 from the Fire District General Fund in order to be fully funded. No reserve funds are required to balance the CFD 88-1 budget. The attached Resolution submitted for your approval establishes the recommended annual special tax to be levied in Fiscal Year 2010/11, as identified in Exhibit "A". The maximum special tax which could be levied is illustrated in Exhibit "B" of the Resolution, utilizing the State of California, Department of Finance methodology for adjusting appropriations limits for State and Local Governments and for adjusting the maximum special tax rate that could be levied. The recommehded special tax levy remains at less than half the special tax which could be levied, with the exception of the vacant land rate. During the budget workshop held on May 26, 2011, the. proposed CFD budget was reviewed. Respectfully submitted, 1~ F ,f~A""~ f` Mike Bell Fire Chief Attachment 1. Resolution 2. Annual Report 3. Map P246 RESOLUTION NO. FD 11-034 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING THE ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-1 FOR, FISCAL YEAR 2011/12 WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, California, (formerly Foothill Fire Protection District, hereinafter referred to as the "legislative body"), has initiated proceedings, held a public hearing, conducted an election and received a favorable vote from the qualified electors relating to the levy of a special tax in a community facilities district, all as authorized pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Mello- Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982," being Chapter 2.5, Part 1, Division 2, Title 5 of the Government Code of the State of California. This community facilities district shall hereinafter be referred to as COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-1 (hereinafter referred to as the "District"); and WHEREAS, this legislative body, by ordinance, as authorized by Section 53340 of the Government Code of the State of California, has authorized the levy of a special tax to pay for costs and expenses related to said community facilities district, and this legislative body is desirous to establish the specific rate of the special tax to be collected for the next fiscal year and to adjust the maximum special tax authorization to be levied. NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District does hereby resolve, determine and order as follows: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2: That the specific rate and amount of the special tax to be collected to pay for the costs and expenses for the next fiscal year (2011/12) for the referenced District is hereby determined and established as set forth in the attached, referenced and incorporated Exhibit "A". SECTION 3: That the rate as set forth above does not exceed the amount as previously authorized by ordinance of this legislative body, and is not in excess of that as previously approved by the qualified electors of the District. SECTION 4: That the proceeds of the special tax shall be used to pay, in whole or in part, the costs of the following, in the following order of priority: P247 A. Payment of principal and interest on any outstanding authorized bonded indebtedness, if any; B. Necessary replenishment of bond reserve funds or other reserve funds, including sinking funds; C. Payment of costs and expenses of authorized public facilities and public services, including the administration of the special tax levy; D. Repayment of advances and loans, if appropriate. The proceeds of the special taxes shall be used as set forth above, and shall not be used for any other purpose. SECTION 5: That the maximum authorized special tax rates for all developed properties are hereby adjusted pursuant to Ordinance No. 17. The maximum authorized special tax rates are set forth in the attached, referenced and incorporated Exhibit "B". SECTION 6: The special tax shall be collected in the same manner as ordinary ad valorem property taxes are collected, and shall be subject to the same penalties and same procedure. and sale in cases of any delinquency for ad valorem taxes, and the Tax Collector is hereby authorized to deduct reasonable administrative costs incurred in collecting any said special tax. SECTION 7: All monies above collected shall be paid into the Community Facilities District funds, including any bond fund and reserve fund. SECTION 8: The Auditor of the County is hereby directed to enter in the next County assessment roll on which taxes will become due, opposite each lot or parcel of land affected in a space marked "public improvements," "special tax" or by any other suitable designation, the installment of the special tax, and for the exact rate and amount of said tax reference is made to the attached Exhibit "A". SECTION 9: The County Auditor shall then, at the close of the tax collection period, promptly render to the Agency a detailed report showing the amount and/or amounts of such special tax installments, interest, penalties and percentages so collected and from what property collected, and also provide a statement of any percentages retained for the expense of making any such collection. Resolution No. FD 11- -Page 2 of 5 P248 PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this day of July, 2011. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED:. L. Dennis Michael, President ATTEST: Janice C. Reynolds, Secretary I, JANICE C. REYNOLDS, SECRETARY of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, at a regular meeting of said Board held on the day of July 2011. Executed this day of July 2011 at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Janice C. Reynolds, Secretary Resolution No. FD 11- -Page 3 of 5 P249 EXHIBIT "A" RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-1 SPECIAL TAX LEVY FISCAL YEAR 2011"/12 SPECIAL TAX LEVY SPECIAL TAX LEVY TAXING CLASSIFICATION FISCAL YEAR 2010/11 FISCAL YEAR 2011/12 1. DEVELOPED PROPERTY A. Residential Class I $451.90 $463.24 (more than 3590 SF) B. Residential Class II $348.29 $356.94 (3077 to 3589 SF) C. Residential Class II $277.13 $284.09 (2564 to 3076 SF) D. Residential Class IV $242.18 $248.26 (2308 to 2563 SF) -E. Residential Class V $209.71 $214.97 (2051 to 2307 SF) F. Residential Class VI $191.00 $195.79 (1795 to 2050 SF) G. Residential Class VII $172.26 $176.58 (less than 1795 SF) Commercial/Industrial Property $695.32 per acre or $712.77 per acre or $0.064 $0.062 per sq.ft. or bldg per square foot or building area, whichever is greater . area, whichever is greater. 2. APPROVED PROPERTY $200 per lot or parcel $200.00 per lot or parcel 3. VACANT PROPERTY $10.00 per acre $10.00 per acre SF =Square Feet Resolution No. FD 11- -Page 4 of 5 P250 EXHIBIT "B" RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-1 MAXIMUM SPECIAL TAX RATES FISCAL YEAR 2011112 DEVELOPED PROPERTY MAXIMUM SPECIAL TAX RATE TAXING CLASSIFICATION FISCAL YEAR 2010/11 FISCAL YEAR 2011/12 1. DEVELOPED PROPERTY A. Residential Class I $973.90 (more than 3590 SF) B. Residential Class II $747.50 (3077 to 3589 SF) C. Residential Class III $596.53 (2564 to 3076 SF) D. Residential Class IV $522.86 (2308 to 2563 SF) E. Residential Class V $447.42 (2051 to 2307 SF) F. Residential Class VI $413.27 (1795 to 2050 SF) G. Residential Class VII $373.72 (less than 1795 SF) H. Commercial/Industrial Property $1,500.37 per acre or $0.1224 per sq.ft. or bldg area, whichever is greater 2. APPROVED PROPERTY $200.00 per lot or parcel 3. VACANT PROPERTY $10.00 per acre SF =Square Feet $991.78 $761.23 $607.48 $532.46 $455.65 $420.86 $380.58 $1,527.93 per acre or $0.1236 per square foot or building area, whichever is greater. $200.00 per lot or parcel $10.00 per acre NOTE: Escalation of maximum special rate. Calculation formula Fiscal Year 2011/12 Pop. Change *CPI 1.0187 X 1.0251 = 1.044269 *CPI -California Per Capita Personal Income Resolution No. FD 11- -Page 5 of 5 P251 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT MELLO-ROOS COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-1 ANNUAL STATUS REPORT Resolution No. JULY 2011 P252 Resolution No. BACKGROUND On April 4, 1989, the qualified voters approved the formation of Mello-Roos Community Facilities District (CFD) No. 88-1 and authorized the District to annually levy a special tax to provide for fire protection services within northeast Etiwanda. On May 19, 1989, the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District (formerly Foothill Fire Protection District) adopted an Ordinance authorizing the District, by Resolution to annual levy a special tax in CFD No. 88-1 for purposes of land acquisition, fire station construction, and purchase of equipment and operations and maintenance costs for fire protection services. CFD No. 88-1 is located within the boundaries of Highland, Cherry, Day Creek Channel and the San Bernardino National Forest. The maximum Special Tax shall be annually adjusted for (a) changes in cost of living (CPI); or (b) changes in the cost of living and changes in population as defined in Section 7901 of the Government Code, as amended, whichever is lesser. The change in the CPI for Fiscal Year 2011- 2012 is 1.0251 or 2.51 %. P253 Resolution No. FISCAL YEAR 2011/2012 DEVELOPED A. Residential Class 1 B. Residential Class 2 C. Residential Class 3 D. Residential Class 4 E. Residential Class 5 F. Residential Class 6 G. Residential Class 7 H. Commercial/Industrial APPROVED UNDEVELOPED $463.24/SFD $356.94/SFD $284.09/SFD $248.26/SFD $214.97/SFD $195.79/SFD $176.58/SFD $712.77/ACRE or $0.064/ SQ. FT. or whichever is greater $200.00/LOT OR PARCEL $10.00/ACRE P254 USES: COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT PROPOSED USES AND SOURCES OF FUNDS COMMUNICATIONS FIRE ADMINISTRATION, OTHER SERVICES DELINQUENT ASSESSMENTS TRANSFER FROM FUND BALANCE DELINQUENCIES FEES REIMBURSEMENTS SPECIAL TAX Resolution No. $ 63,990.00 $ 48,360.00 $1,715,670.00 $ 0.00 $1,828,690.00 $ 633,830.00 $ 75,960.00 $ 1,500.00 $ 10,000.00 $1,106,730.00 $1,828,020.00 P255 ~~ ~ DO ~ y,, .~ ~ ~ V ° •~ J Q ~ Q ~ ~ !_' V_ ~ U U ~ o ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~. w . ~ ~ J ~,~' o ~ ~ ~ -,, ~ ~ ~ _ . ~~ c ~ m O ~ ~ ~ -~ ~- , . ~ ~ `T 1 , _ ~ L ,(~ - m o 0 " i ~ ~~. _ '~ , ~;~~~. r ~ ~ ~ , a ~ ~ i ny }set ~ ',~ , ~ ; . F + T ~ ~ ~`~ I ~ ~ ,` i r e ue,v~i~~ , _. y ny epuenn!}3 ~ , i << s ~, Y , ~ „ ~. _ ~ ~ .,= ~ ~ ~~ ~{2ai~ ,erg ~ . ~~~ - . _ h ~ ti.:.._ :_.:.. ..~ -_._ _, . - -- V ny as}sayoo~ ny as}sayoo~ ,.• i ny ua~!p!W r._.._....... ny ua~i!II!W ~ ; '' ~ _ i i ny uaneH i ny uaneH r~ _ ~ ny ~sc~~uaaH . ~`~~~ ny esoua~aH i nt/ pleq!yoad ~ nd pleq!yo~d i ny uewllaH •'~ sue ~ ny UewllaH ~/ ~ ~ ~ ~ . ny p~e~(au!/~ i }S ue!lauae~ i ~•_ .say >o.~ ~ e~'<q~~~ s q ~ . ~ ~ o?kv ~~p°' A ag g L = ~ 9`ea~--.Eras ~ ~ .. -+ s p -~ ~ (0 m O Q _ `ss~egA`~Emz3 C L.L ~b~ p=~9 C=~'_ ~ ~ ~ '~ >ap ~e ~~ ~69e "~~Wuq °~~a8 fn (6 _ m 6~~2&~k~~~~3ea~ ~®~~~~~g~E `a V Vp oc, •~EE ~YB~q•gg6~ SLE" ~pp~+=E~pa. `s ;E as ."3 C,J '3~E'> ~ ~~~AVA~~a~dE P256 STAFF REPORT ~-~ ~ j CITY Nh,N.~GER'5 OFFICE ~ RANCHO Date: July 6, 2011 CUCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council From: Fabian Villenas, Principal Management Analyst Subject: Review and Update of California Citizens Redistricting Commission's Draft Maps and Approval for City to Urge the Commission to Revise Assembly District Map SBCUCA and Senate District Map SBBAN to Include the Entire City of Rancho Cucamonga Recommendation it is recommended that the City Council receive the report regarding the California Citizens Redistricting Commission's Draft Maps and approve the City's position urging the Commission to Revise Assembly District Map SBCUCA and Senate District SBBAN to include the entire City of Rancho Cucamonga within a San Bernardino County district. Background California must redraw the boundaries of its Congressional, Senate, Assembly, and State Board of Equalization districts every 10 years, to reflect the new federal census population data. In November 2008, California voters authorized the creation of the Citizens Redistricting Commission (Commission) by passing the Voters FIRST Act, which appeared as Proposition 11. Prior to 2008, 'California legislators drew the districts. The Voters FIRST Act requires the California State Auditor to initiate an application process for selecting the members of the Citizens Redistricting Commission. The Commission is comprised of 14 members -five Democrats, five Republicans, and four members that are neither Democrat or Republican. The Commission must draw the district boundaries in conformity with strict, nonpartisan rules designed to create districts of relatively equal population that will provide fair representation for all Californians. The 14 Commissioners are: 1. Dr. Gabino Aguirre -Democrat 2. Angelo Ancheta -Democrat 3. Vince Barabba -Republican 4. Maria Blanco -Democrat 5. Cynthia Dai -Democrat 6. Michelle DiGuilio -Decline to State 7. Jodie Filkins Webber -Republican 8. Stanley Forbes -Decline to State 9. Connie Galambos Malloy -Decline to State 10. Gil Ontai -Republican 11. M. Andre Parvenu -Decline to State 12. Jeanne Raya -Democrat 13. Dr. Michael Ward -Republican P257 REVIEW AND UPDATE OF CAL11"ORN1A CITIZENS RF_DISTRIC"TING COMMISSIONS DRAFT MAPS ANI~ PAGE 2 APPROVAL FOR CITY TO URGE 1'I-IE COMMISSION TO RI~VISE ASSEMBLY DISTRICT MAP SBCUCA AND SENATE DISTRICT MAP SBBAN TO INCLUDE 'I'I-IE ENTIRE CITY Or R.\NCHO CUCf\MONG11 ULY 6, 2011 14. Peter Yao -Republican District lines are drawn to ensure that there are the same number of people in each district. Redistricting ensures every person has equal representation by drawing districts with an equal number of people -one person, one vote. The Commission is mandated to consider certain criteria and in rank order, meaning that in the case of a conflict between criteria, it must choose to comply with the higher priority criterion. The redistricting criteria for the Commission are: 1. Comply with the US Constitution, including its equal population requirements. 2. Comply with the federal Voting Rights Act. 3. Draw districts that are contiguous. This means that a district should be connected at all points. 4. Respect counties, cities, communities of interest, and neighborhoods, where possible. 5. Draw districts to be geographically compact, where practicable, such that nearby areas of population are not bypassed for more distant population. 6. Draw districts to nest within each other, where possible after complying the preceding criteria. That means one Senate district contains two Assembly districts and one Board of Equalization district contains ten Senate districts. 7. The Commission may not consider an incumbent or political candidate's residence in creating a district. With the release of the first draft of the District Maps on June 10~h, the public was able to view the proposed maps and submit comments and suggestions. A series of public hearings were held throughout the state to review the proposed District Maps including one in San Bernardino County held on June 19, 2011. Deadline to receive testimony from the public regarding the proposed District Maps was June 28, 2011. The Commission will release its second round of draft maps on July 14, 2011 and may again hold a series of public hearings throughout the state for further public input. The Commission is tentatively scheduled to post the final District Maps on July 26, 2011. Deadline for final Commission approval is August 15, 2011. Citizens Redistricting Commission Timeline First Draft of Proposed District Maps Released June 10, 2011 Deadline to Receive Testimony on First Draft of June 28, 2011 Proposed District Maps Second Draft of Proposed District Maps July 14, 2011 Released Tentative Date for Commission to Post Final July 26,2011 maps Final Deadline for Commission to Approve Final August 15, 2011 Maps P258 R)/VIE'W ~\ND UPD~\TE OF C~\LII^ORN}~\ CITIZL:NS REDISTRICTING COMMISSIONS DR~\I'1' M~\PS ~1ND P~\GE 3 APPROVAL. FOR CITY TO URGE "THE COMMISSION TO REVISF_ ASSEMBLY DISTRICT MAP SBCUCA AND SENT\TE DIS'T'RICT IVI~\P SBBAN TO INCLUDE THE ENTIRE CITY OF R~1NCH0 CUC~\MONGr1 - .Y 6; 2011 First Draft Maps Released The proposed maps released by the Commission show that a portion of Rancho Cucamonga will be under the SBCUCA Assembly District (Exhibit A) and the SBBAN Senate District (Exhibit B), respectively. However, the Northwest portion of Rancho Cucamonga (bordered by Haven Avenue and 19th Street) is located in separate Senate and Assembly districts that are almost totally in Los Angeles County. The proposed San Gabriel Mtn Foothills Assembly District just west of Rancho Cucamonga which contains the Northwest section of Rancho Cucamonga and neighboring Upland, also includes the Los Angeles County communities of La Verne, San Dimas, Glendora, Azusa, Duarte, Sierra Madre, La Canada Flintridge and even touches the San Fernando Valley. A copy of this map is included as Exhibit C. The proposed LASGF Senate District west of Rancho Cucamonga which also includes the Northwest corner of Rancho Cucamonga, includes the aforementioned cities plus Pasadena, South Pasadena, Burbank, and Glendale and again stretches out to touch the San Fernando Valley. A copy of this map is included as Exhibit D. Both of these maps separate approximately 33,300 Rancho Cucamonga residents, or 20 percent of the population; from the rest of the Rancho Cucamonga community and places them into separate districts. Some of these Los Angeles County communities are more than 50 miles from Rancho Cucamonga and share no commonality or community interests with our residents. For the residents in the northwestern portion of our city, all of their municipal services including library, community services, animal services, etc., are provided by the City. Law enforcement services are provided through a contract with the San Bernardino County Sheriff's Department and fire and emergency services through the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District. On a regional basis, transportation issues are addressed through the San Bernardino Association of Governments (SANBAG) and CalTrans District 8. Public transit services are provided by Omnitrans. The representation and services that these entities provide have virtually no connection or relationship with Los Angeles County and the San Gabriel and San Fernando Valley communities that are included in the proposed District Maps. Consequently, the proposed Draft Maps do not meet the Commission's stated criteria to "respect counties, cities, communities of interests, and neighborhoods, where possible." The proposed Draft Maps bifurcate a substantial and well-established portion of our community and place it into. obscurity with over ahalf-dozen prominent L.A. County communities. The residents of Northwest Rancho Cucamonga have strong ties and a strong sense of identity with the rest of the Rancho Cucamonga community, San Bernardino County, and the Inland Empire. Actions Taken and Next Steps Because of the aforementioned reasons and in order to meet the June 28th deadline, the City took action to submit a letter to the Commission urging them to revise the proposed Assembly and Senate District Maps and keep Rancho Cucamonga whole and entirely within San Bernardino County. A copy of the letter is attached as Exhibit E. Additionally, the City of Upland, who would also join the northwest portion of Rancho Cucamonga in proposed Assembly and Senate Districts that are primarily in Los Angeles County, submitted a separate letter to the Commission urging them to keep Upland in San Bernardino County. Other entities have also advocated for the revision of these Assembly and Senate Draft Maps. Inland Action Inc., anon-profit, non-partisan Inland Empire advocacy group, have submitted testimony and proposed maps to the Commission that divides fewer cities and maintains the Inland P259 REVIEW AND UPDATE OF CrV_IFORNIA CITI7_,ENS REDISTRICTING COMMISSIONS DRAFT MAPS AND PAGE 4 APPROVAL FOR CITY TO URGE TI-iE COMMISSION TO REVISE ASSEMBLY DISTRICT MAP SBCUCA ~\ND SF_NATE DISTRICT MAP SBBAN TO INCLUDE THE ENTIRE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ULY 6, 2011 Empire as a single region. Their proposed map for our area keeps Rancho Cucamonga whole and within San Bernardino County and represents a better alternative for the City of Rancho Cucamonga. With the Council's direction, City staff will continue to track this issue and state the City's position at every available opportunity. While the second draft of proposed district maps is scheduled for release on July 14~', it is unclear at this time how much public input will be allowed if any, however, the City will be mobilized to provide our input and also provide information to residents regarding the issue and encourage the public to submit their comments as well. Recommendation Approve the City's position urging the Commission to Revise Assembly District Map SBCUCA and Senate District SBBAN to include the entire City of Rancho Cucamonga together and within a San Bernardino County district. Respectfully Submitted, ,,,.,..w,~., ,~ Fabian A. Villenas Principal Management Analyst ATTACHMENTS: - Exhibit A: Proposed Assembly District Map SBCUCA Exhibit B: Proposed Senate District Map SBBAN Exhibit C: Proposed Assembly District Map San Gabriel Mtn Foothills (includes northwest portion of City) Exhibit D: Proposed Senate District Map LASGF (includes northwest portion or City) Exhibit E: Letter sent to Citizens Redistricting Commission dated June 27, 2011 P260 California State Assembly - SBCUCA 20110610_g2 AD_southern_ca_SBCUCA.pdf Exhibit A Z M~ MW rWn v / (A'~ `J W `^~ (A'i`) /w\J ~ / r~ V / • LO U ,, • • ~ ... .. .. < . . B < .,.~ •.;.~.' a ~ :• .. . . <... ' • ••4 ~i . . ~! ~~ ~ C~ ~ • r~ r . • • .O 1 .. , " . , . • . .. = `~ a, ~ ~ . . __ ~ ~ ~ : Q O e ~~~,.~.~: .V .' ' ' ` ~ •'. m r l9 ' ' ' ' ~.~.~ ' ' ~ ~ ' • ' .'.':.•..j.' 's'~.'.:..'.'. .:.'.' ' ' .': ~' .. ' ' ' f : ' '~ ' . . . ~: . t ~ . .~~,,~. . • y .~. .~.~ . :.. . . : .. ..; ~ 00 ~ .•:.•. a - : O •~•• - . f . ' a m .~ X ` . . .~ 71 c .~ W ~ . fi ~ ~'L~' ~ ~ M ~ QN `~ ~.~ ~ .. .~. '' .' ~ O .~ v 4 • ` ` . a ~ ~ ° o ~. ~~p• vw . . - yy / '. . A " ~ ~ , ,~ ~o . w . M~ M~~ Q1N . -~ NM1[~ . ~ ~o .r ~ ,_ ~ goe ~ ~~~'4 P261 i X W MZ MW W ~, ~, L 0 WI ~~ N Qi O_ t~ O O N ~--~ 0 a--+ G .~ .Q ~~ V rr~ v, 1 _~ -f--+ rr~--~ VJ L ~~ U P262 U ~_ L X W v a C7 gl -I v ~I N Q ~_Op O T N r~ rVn ~/ / ~~~( \V n~ fWn ~//'~/~ W ~--~ r~ v/~/ • L O ~ ~ U _ r ~ "~ ~ ~ ZNo v _ a~~ c m M C u • •~f ~~~ ~~ ~ r .. i C A c ~ E~ c :.;..: m .. ... ~ ,•:•.•: _ .•,~ ,o . , . .•.•,•. d. .:: .•.•. :•:::.,. ..,.:.•::. c ......... ~~~,, ~ c .'.'.'.. ~_ m ~ r .'.'..':::.'. ~ ' '~'~ t7 '.'.':.'.'.'.'.'.'.' '-1~ ~ ~ ~'. ,....+ ,~ 'V , L V .~.~ ~. ?l a 3 ~ - ~. ~ m~ ~ ~ e I`1 ~ . ~ «'w v ~~~~ ~ .~ { LL' ~~~~ .~. iii ~~~~ •~ ~~~~ O ~ ~ .~. • • • . ..• .. ~ ,e ,. o .;. :. /~ o .' a' W ~ e 7 e ~ ~ -~- _ g _ gNO. . T`~ `~ ~~ :': _S-'-----_H r ~ ~ -- - - - - - - - - - - - P263 ~~ ~_ L X W LL C7 g~ _~ 0 ~~ N O (O O O N t~,~ ) ~'~ .rte }~r .,I :~ ~ANCHO ~`,UCAA90NGA P264 IU~rpnr L. DLhNIti j\~~1CH:1F.1. • i11rr~~nrPro7rur ~A1~1 ~PAGNOL(, Cuuuril AJr•~ulirrs ~~~1LLlA~9 ~. t~LF]:.4NDER. CHUCK RUQUET, DIANE Vti,11LL]AA]S Ciry~ ~11~rnrr,~cr J,tC1: Lit,(, A]CP 'S'HE CITY OF RA,'~1CH0 CUCAMONGA June 27, 2011 Citizens Redistricting Commission 1130 K Street, Suite 101 Sacramento, CA 95814 RE: Proposed Assembly and Senate District Maps for the City of Rancho Cucamonga Dear Members of the Citizens Redistricting Commission: On behalf of the 168,000 citizens of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, 1 strongly urge the California Citizens Redistricting Commission (Commission) to reconsider its proposed P.ssembly and Senate District Maps and maintain the City of Rancho Cucamonga entirely urider one Assembly and one Senate District, within San Bernardino County. The proposed maps released by the Commission show that a portion of Rancho Cucamonga will be under the SBCUCA Assembly District and the SBBAN Senate District, respectively. Unfortunately, the entire Northwest portion of Rancho Cucamonga (bordered by Haven Avenue and the 210 freeway) which includes approximately 33,000 residents or 20 percent of the Rancho Cucamonga's population, is disenfranchised from effective representation with the rest of Rancho Cucamonga by being lumped into separate Senate and Assembly districts that are almost totally in Los Angeles County. The proposed LASGF Assembly District just west of Rancho Cucamonga which contains the Northwest section of Rancho Cucamonga and neighboring Upland (both in San Bernardino County), also includes the Los Angeles County communities of La Verne,' San Dimas, Glendora, Azusa, Duarte, Sierra Madre, La Canada Flintridge and even touches the San Fernando Valley. The proposed LASGF Senate District west of Rancho Cucamonga which also includes the Northwest corner of Rancho Cucamonga, includes the aforementioned cities plus Pasadena, South Pasadena, Burbank, and Glendale and again stretches out to touch the San Fernando Valley. Some of these communities are more than 50 miles from Rancho Cucamonga and have virtually no commonality or shared interests with the City- Clearly, the proposed Draft Maps do not meet the Commission's stated criteria tc "respect counties, cities, communities of interest, and neighborhoods, where possible." In fact, the proposed Draft Maps bifurcate a substantial and well-established portion of our community and place it into obscurity with over ahalf-dozen prominent L.A. County communities. The voices of our 33,000 residents that live in the Northwest area will be Exhibit E 1050{) (;~ivir Cxntrr Dr. • C(7. Rtts f;0' • R:uuhu C:ucamun~a, C .A 91'_'")-0811; • lcl (909) y%7-?700 • fas (`)0`)1 '7-2h-}y • n~tw.C:irynf7ZC.us ~ P265 Citizen's Redistricting Commission June 27, 2011 completely drowned out by the 465,804 voices in the proposed Assembly District and 929,398 voices in the proposed Senate District that overwhelmingly reside in Los Angeles County.. The .residents of Northwest Rancho Cucamonga share no community interests with these Los Angeles County communities. All municipal services for this area, including library, community services, community development, animal control, and others are provided by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Law enforcement services are provided through a contract with the San Bernardino County Sheriffs Department, and fire and emergency response is provided by the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, a subsidiary district of the City. On a regional basis, transportation issues are addressed through the San Bernardino Association of Governments (SANBAG) and CalTrans District 8. Public transit services for the San Bernardino Valley are provided by OmniTrans. The representation and services that these entities provide in no way overlap or have any connection or relationship with Los Angeles County and the San Gabriel and San Fernando Valley communities that are identified in the proposed District Maps. The residents of Northwest Rancho Cucamonga have strong ties and a strong sense of identity with the rest of the Rancho Cucamonga community, San Bernardino County, and the Inland Empire. There are no commonalities between our residents and Los Angeles County, and the proposed Assembly and Senate District Maps needlessly split our community and our neighborhoods, effectively nullifying their voices and opportunity for strong representation. For these reasons, we respectfully request that the Commission keep Rancho Cucamonga whole and entirely within San Bernardino County and REVISE Proposed Assembly District Map SBCUCA and Senate District Map SBBAN to include the ENTIRE City of Rancho Cucamonga. Thank you for your consideration. Please feel free to call (909) 477-2700, ext. 2006 if you require any further information or have any questions. Sincerely, ~.~-- L. DENNIS MICHAEL Mayor Cc: City Council ATTACHMENT -2- HIV ,• •^ U ~ ~ .~ ~ .V U ~ ' ~. ~--~ .~-~ .~ ~ ~ -- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o N ~ •- O L U ~ c~ .~ ~ L .~ O U N ca U ~ ~ O . O ~ ~ N ~ ~\ r~ ~ ~ • O U o ~. O ~ ~ ~ ~~ .~ ~ ~ ~ Q O Q ~U ~ Cn ^~11 W LL . U ~ -~ ~ ~ (/1 ~ ~~ ~ > U .~ w O m (/1 Q W ^~ rW v / c~ O .~ O cn U~ ~ .~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~° c~ O c~ c~ . . .. .~ .v L N 3 C w a 0 O i O -Q fi U '~ Q = ~ ~ ~ ~ ~w ~ y ~ i o °~ ,~ ~ o ~ y `` O C ~--+ V ~ a U '~ v ~ y ~ ~ ~ ~ y o v0 ~ ~ ~ Q ~ o ~i U O O ~~ Um~3 a~ U ~ U ~ c~ ~ ~~ Q ~ L L Q ~ U ~- O ~ U U }, ~' ~ O ~ ~ ~ U ~ Ca ~ c -~ ~ ~ .~ ~ ~ o ~ a o mzz c~ a~ 0 0 ^L I..L 0 -1--+ L LL r r O N w O r 4~ _~ 0 0 a~ a~ .>_ a~ U Q -~--+ r r O N w N di ~. -1--+ L IL a~ c~ a~ a~ c~ Q U r r O N w r • • 0 0 .~ ._ 0 U 0 ~--+ r r O N w N • Q N .~ ~--+ O 0 0 .~ 0 U 0 a~ ~_ r r O N r N 3 Q • c~ c~ ~_ ~..L 0 Q. ~. ~~ M ,~ t~ ~ .}.~ ~ Oi i ~ i w~ w y 01 L U o a c O 9 C W LL C _ O N m C O C A N N 2 N W O C b O O ` °i ~ o ~ A LL az 0 C ~? N c o `mV m O w s ~ - U d ~ C C ao nU 0 -~ f V• _~ ~_ ,_ . ~. ~ ~ ~ ~ A C i ~ d 'pro ~- 'p ~, O R ~ y C ~ ~ ~~' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~ d '~ ~~ ~ ~ I O ~ 3 ~ Q' C C 4~i ~ j ~ ~Q a _~ t~~ ~/ 1, ~ ~ I o ~ c '~ O t ~`~ N Y U ~~ 1 C U = = a ~ O '- c i E ~ ~ O -~ ~a' ~~ ~ ~ i C_ G `~ } J p L m ~, io °° c tEo m ~ o p ov ~~ ~-+ ~ ^~ ~~ J M to ~ ~ ~ .~ L ~ ~ r w t- ~w ~~ w o w ~ - t m a o= m= L_ U A y ,' V ~ m c A '~ a a v ~_ _~ N C ~ , ~ O ~U K d T d ~ aR a> ~v m `m ~` •- a N O m V _ ~ ~ ___._ Qi o ~ C m C O ~ LL C ~ A ~ ~ ~ G O R A 9 t a z ~E ~~ iii __-- -- __ w A „ O L w m o o+ o Q Z LLH a ~ ~ G O ~ 3 J t O Q U 1 M O ~ C p C C LL w ~ N C C 4 ~ {O ~ 2 T m ~ ~ m Q A v 3 ~ ~ I A 1, L I M ¢~ m ' ~ ~ ~ T o ~ UG' O d .p N m 1 ~. ~ - l ~. ~~ p v ~ v ~, ~ p p U J~ a C Z ~ ~ ~ .& o U a o O U~ LL -_ c C '~ ~ - 2 O 7 A U ~ N ~ L _ ~ lL ~_ ~ ~ ~ = / ate , { ap ' / o~ l ~ J y A ~~ > C C7 y o ~ U p c U ~ ......................... - ;~: '~' "~ . ~ ~ '. ~ ~ a ~ m m ~ ~ : : : ~ : : : ~~~~~~ - o - ,.. - o L ~~ - ~ 'i'~ N ed' ~ • 1''~ T! ,,;. 1 ~~~ ~~ ~ '' ~ ~1 '. . ~,, '~' ~. ~ ?; . C :~ ~~'! ao ~ , '~~ ;;~ ;~. _ ~ Q t~ J 4 ~ ~~ 1 4~ .~..+ :+: t N •~ ~~' O i ~;~ ~ N :;: ._, ~ ~ ~ ~ L?~~5'~ ~, ,, 1~ i '`. :t ~~. ~~~ t . _ ' ~' 0 N ~' '; •,- C 'a ~ S N Q O ~ L i I` r 4 ~ s ~iT ~~ • v ! Ywr r~i .. a _ ! ~ r.r: _..._.. day ~„•• rq rang .~ ••^'1••tW7H @ l k~ YYIl Y~ Ng ~ •~~' i•U ~' - _ +~;.~ -f----- ~------- - 2 f' O ~~ a '.~ • ~• f, ~r ~ :! ~ • r ~, E tL = ! .. ~ k . p.. il` ~ frlsr~ Y~ :t ~ `r ••Y _.. ~ ~ . N it - --- -9s1T rrp 614 Nrr+] ...., { 0. ..Y a f .~ ~ Y ~~ ~ , •~y tfµw{ ~ ~ ') I ~f-- '. ~ ~ _~:i.:. ~ ~ v .: . - ._. _~ ~ . F r y .. ~'y w~tur ~ ,: ~ ¢' ~ . z ~`~~ ' a a ~' - i+ ~ 4 arY Grp =e ~ ~ ~ i ` { ... ' -._ r a ray w ~ 4 ~ r~y ~;..ra y~ i' ~ ~ ~ } ~ r.. C i O r i ~ 1 v ...y ..-.., ji E _ - _ • ~"~ _ ~, •>r •trwtie.ty d ~~: ° ~f ~ a it'' ' ~ ''~ y.'~i , ~~" V ~ ~ = ~ -- - - +3 wt} C r ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' r,y pie~ir!j~ K_ s~:~`~ ; : ~-ny PiiRJ A Ri s ~ . ' ~~ r'+*~y , rfy xtty+ ~ i •~~ a~ur ~ T `~`~ !.- Y i is ... NRr (~ _ Mr /MhY[7 N M n ' f ~ " ~ f p ~~M ~ ~L7 •`Y Nrel 1. - ~ ~ ~ j r i ~ r _ .. .__ a ~ a v ^ ~ ~ M .. r Sri M ~ { i j •~ it t 17 e~.eaiYC ni - ~ ~. •--+ ~ ~~ -~-~~ ~ ~ .L L ~ 'Q ~ .~ ~ W ~ ~ ~~ O O ~ ~ O ~ O ~ ~ ~ ~--+ C ~~ O ~ N O O O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O N ~ ~ O (~ +~ t~ > .. ~ ~ ~ ~ a--~ U N ~ i.., (n ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~~ •~ ~U .~ ~ ~ ~ ~ c~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ ~~ c~~ U -~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Q ~ ~ O O O ~ ~ ~ m ~ ° ~ ~ ~ c cU O~ v~ ~ UU ~~ ~' ~ U cn O U ~ N ~ O ~ ~ O ~ V U O ~ ~~ ~~ ~•- Q~ c~~.., - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O O - - - ~ ~ ~ ~~ Q ~~ O ~I..r O U ~~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ O O ~ ~ ~ •L ~ O ~ U ''~' O -~--~ ~ ~ ,~ ~ O .o ~ _ ~ 0 O U ~w ~v~~ ~~~ .~ O U O ~ ~ O -~ 4) ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ /~~ /1 0 •`-, ^` L O ~~ ~ ~ •- o ~~ ~ ~ ~ U ~ ~ -~ U a~ - o c~ ~ ~ U ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ W ~~ ^~ ^W W ~~ -F~ -1--~ o ~ U o ~ ~ ~ ._ ~ ~ ~ C~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ °~ o ~ U Cn Q ~ ~ •- ~ ~ ~ ._ ~ ~ - ^~ W ~~ ._ a~ ~= - ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 'c~ cn O ._ c~ ~ .~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a~ ~ .~ ~ c~ ._ ~~- ~ O ~ ._ W ~ ~ ._ ~ U ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ._ _ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ c~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .~ o ~ ~ U ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .~ ~ t!1 }, ~ ~ c~ ~ ~ o ~ o ~ ~ ~ U ~ ~ = p U ~ C6 ~--~ ~ > .~ cn O ~ ~ O ~ ~ .~ ~' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ +~ ~ _ ~ ~ U C~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ p ~ ~ ~ ~ (~ O ~ ~ ~ ,~ ~ ~~ - - V ~ •- > ~ z ~~ w 0 ~ o ~ }, U ~ .~ ~ ~ U ~ ~ C~ V . D U ~ ~ ~ o a~ Q ~ ~ ~ U ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Cn ~ ~ C~ 'j Cn ~ Cn ~ ~ O ~ p ~ ~ ~ .~ ~ ~ •- ~ ~ Q U o U ~ . ~ ~ a~ ~ ~ -- U ~ ~ ~ m ~ ~ • ~ C!) ~ ~ ._ ~ V - o ~ ~ ~ ~ U c~ o ~ .~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Z ~ >, ~ V Q ~ ~ ~ _ ~ ~ - o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ._ oo ~ o ~ o cn ~ U STAFF REPORT CITY MANAGERS OFFICE Date: July 6, 2011 To: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager From: Fabian A. Villenas, Principal Management Analyst By: Nicole Solano, Administrative Intern P266 RANCHO CUCAMONGA Subject: DESIGNATION OF A VOTING REPRESENTATIVE AND ALTERNATES FOR THE 2011 LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES ANNUAL MEETING RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council designate one Voting Delegate and two Alternates for the Business Session of the 2011 League of California Cities Annual Conference. BACKGROUND This year's League of California Cities Annual Conference is scheduled for Wednesday, September 21 through Friday, September 23, 2011, in San Francisco at the San Francisco Moscone West Convention Center. The Annual Business Meeting will take place on Friday, September 23, 2011 at 2:30 p.m. The membership will be taking action on Conference Resolutions, which establish League policy on municipal issues of statewide importance. The League of California Cities (i.e., the "League") requires that each member city designate one (1) Voting Delegate .and up to two (2) Alternates, which according to the League bylaws must be designated by an official vote of the City Council. The designated Voting Delegate and Alternates must be registered to attend the Conference and sign in at the League Voting Desk. Only one (1) Voting Card will be provided at sign-in to be used by either the Voting Delegate OR the Alternates. The task of voting at the Business Meeting cannot be transferred to any other city official beyond the designated Voting Delegate and Alternates. The Voting Delegate and Alternates may be designated at the Council's discretion from Council Members or City Staff scheduled to attend the Conference. Either the Voting Delegate or the Alternates must be present with the Voting Card at the Business Session to vote. CONCLUSION For your consideration, it is offered as a recommendation that the City Council designate one Council Member to serve as the primary Delegate and another Council Member to serve as an Alternate; with Staff or an additional Council Member serving as the second Alternate. Respectfully Submitted, Cam' Fabian A. Villenas Principal Management Analyst P26.7 DESIGNATION OF A VOTING REPRESENTATIVE AND ALTERNATES FOR THE 2011 PAGE 2 LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES ANNUAL MEETING JULY 6, 2011 Attachment -League Annual Conference Voting Procedures and Submittal Form ~~~~ ~~ T FA(~T P268 1400 K STREET D ~ L L 1 ` ~J SACRAMeNTO, CA 95814 f I" OF CALIFORNIA rx: (916) 658-8200 J U ~ ~ ~ 2 ~ ~ ~ (~ T T T ~ C Ex: (916) 658-8240 ..~~ . VVWW.CAC1Ti ES.ORG Council Action Advised by August 26, 2011 June 9, 2011 TO: Mayors, City Managers and City Clerks RE: DESIGNATION OF VOTING DELEGATES AND ALTERNATES League of California Cities Annual Conference -September 21-23, San Francisco The League's 2011 Annual Conference is scheduled for September 21-23 in San Francisco. An important part of the Annual Conference is the Annual Business Meeting (at the closing Gene~•al Assembly), scheduled for 2:30 p.m., Friday, September 23, at the San Francisco Moscone West Convention Center. At this meeting, the League membership considers and takes action on resolutions that establish League policy. In order to vote at the Annual Business Meeting, your city council must designate a voting .:delegate. Your city may also appoint up to two alternate voting delegates, one of whom may vote in the event that the designated voting delegate is unable to serve in that capacity. Please complete the attached Voting Delegate form and return it to the League's office no later than Friday, August 26, 2011. This will allow us time to establish voting delegate/alternates' records prior to the conference. Please note the following procedures that are intended to ensure the integrity of the voting process at the Annual Business Meeting. • Action by Council Required. Consistent with League bylaws, a city's voting delegate and up to two alternates must be designated by the city council. When completing the attached Voting Delegate form, please attach either a copy of the council resolution that reflects the council action taken. or have your city clerk or mavo, r sign the form affirming that .the names provided are those selected by the city council. Please note that designating the voting delegate and alternates must be done by city council action and cannot be accomplished by individual action of the mayor or city manager alone. Conference Registration Required. The voting delegate and alternates must be registered to attend the conference. They need not register for the entire conference; they may register for Friday only. To register for the conference, please go to our website: www.cacities.or~. In order to cast a vote, at least one person must be present at the Business Meeting and in possession of the voting delegate card. Voting delegates and alternates need to pick up their conference badges before signing in and picking up -more- O it9) M P269 i k'~ ' LEAGUE ~;~,~_. 1400 K Street, Suite 400 • Sacramento, California 95814 Phone: 916.658.8200 Fax: 916.658.8240 www.cacities.org Annual Conference Voting Procedures 2011 Annual Conference One City One Vote. Each member city has a right to cast one vote on matters pertaining to League policy. 2. Designating a Cit3~ Voting Representative. Prior to the Annual Conference, each city council may designate a voting delegate and up to two alternates; these individuals are identified on the Voting Delegate Form provided to the League Credentials Committee. 3. Registering with the Credentials Committee. The voting delegate, or alternates, may pick up the city's voting card at the Voting Delegate Desk in the conference registration area. Voting delegates and alternates must sign in at the Voting Delegate Desk. Here they will receive a special sticker on their name badge and thus be admitted to the voting area at the Business Meeting. 4. Signing Initiated Resolution Petitions. Only those individuals who are voting delegates (or alternates), and who have picked up their city's voting card by providing a signature to the Credentials Committee at the Voting Delegate Desk, may sign petitions to initiate a resolution. Voting. To cast the city's vote, a city official must have in his or her possession the city's voting card and be registered with the Credentials Committee. The voting card may be transferred freely between the voting delegate and alternates, but may not be transferred to another city official who is neither a voting delegate or alternate. Voting Area at Business Meeting. At the Business Meeting; individuals with a voting card will sit in a designated area. Admission will be limited to those individuals with a special sticker on their name badge identifying them as a voting delegate or alternate. 7. Resolving Disputes. In case of dispute, the Credentials Committee will determine the validity of signatures on petitioned resolutions and the right of a city official to vote at the Business Meeting. r ~~ ~, L~AGU~ u=~ ~~~ ``°-- O F CAL 1 F 0 P.N I A ~~~~`=:CITIES F e~rY: 2011 ANNUAL CONFERENCE VOTING DELEGATE/ALTERNATE FORM Please complete this form and return it to the League office by Friday, August 26, 2011. Forms not sent by this deadline may be submitted to the Voting Delegate Desk located in the Annual Conference Registration Area. four city council may designate one voting delegate and up to two alternates. In order to.vote at the Annual Business Meeting (General Assembly), voting delegates and alternates must be designated by your city council. Please attach the council resolution as proof of designation. As an alternative, the Mayor or City Clerk may sign this form, affirming that the designation reflects the action taken by the council. Please note: Voting delegates and alternates will be seated in a separate area at the Annual Business Meeting. Admission to this designated area will be limited to individuals (voting delegates and alternates) who are identified with a special sticker on their conference badge. This sticker can be obtained only at the Voting Delegate Desk. 1. VOTING DELEGATE Name: Title: 2. VOTING DELEGATE -ALTERNATE Name: Title: 3. VOTING DELEGATE -ALTERNATE Name: Title: PLEASE ATTACH COUNCIL RESOLUTION DESIGNATING VOTING DELEGATE AND ALTERNATES. OR ATTEST: I affirm that the information provided reflects action by the city council to designate the voting delegate and alternate(s). Nance: E-mail Mayor or City Clerk Phone: (circle one) (signature) Date: Please complete and return by Fridav, August 26 to: League of California Cities FAX: (916) 658-8240 ATTN: Mary McCullough E-mail: mccullom@cacities.org 1400 K Street (916) 658-8247 Sacramento, CA 95814 270 V otin gDel e gateLetter l 1. doc STAFF REPORT ADMINISTR2~TIVE SERVICES DEP~IRTMENT Date: July 6, 2011 To: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager From: John R. Gillison, Assistant City Manag Subject: LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT (LMD) 2-R ANALYSIS AND CLARIFICATION P271 ' ~~ _~;., RANCHO C,UCAMONGA RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the City Council receive and file this report and authorize staff to place on the City Website with the other information on LMD 2-R. BACKGROUND The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga (the "City") has initiated proceedings to consider the formation of LMD 2-R to replace existing Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 and to provide for the levy of special assessments within LMD 2-R to finance the maintenance and servicing of the paseos, parkways, median islands, street trees, parks, landscaped sites and appurtenant facilities that are throughout the Victoria Planned Community. These improvements are located within the street right-of-ways, dedicated public easements and parks which are within the boundaries of the District. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 4 of Article XIIID of the California Constitution ("Article XIIID"), the City retained the services of NBS to provide assessment engineering services pertaining to the proceedings to consider the formation of LMD 2-R, including but not limited to, the identification of those properties that will receive special benefit from the maintenance and servicing of the improvements. On June 1, 2011, the City Council approved the Preliminary Engineers Report and authorized staff to initiate the Proposition 218 Mail Ballot Process. Ballots were mailed on June 2, 2011 to all property owners within LMD 2-R and the balloting process will remain open until July 20, 2011 at which time the ballots submitted to the City Clerk will be opened and counted in a public hearing before the City Council to determine if the assessment increase passes or not. ANALYSIS On June 14, 2011, a letter to the Daily Bulletin was published concerning the pending LMD 2-R Proposition 218 Mail Ballot Process. Although the City Council may not take an official position on a Proposition 218 assessment increase, the City is permitted and in fact is required to play a role in disseminating factual information on the process, the proposed changes, and the underlying circumstances and context. In the latter capacity, a number of factual inconsistencies were noted in the June 14, 2011 letter and staff was asked to prepare this report in order to correct the information currently available to the public. P272 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT (L,MD) 2-R ANALYSIS AND CLARIFICATION PAGE 2 Y 6, 2011 First of all, the letter noted the boundaries of LMD 2-R were the "210 Freeway, Milliken and Etiwanda Avenues, and Foothill Boulevard." In fact, the correct boundaries of the. district are the 210 Freeway on the north, Etiwanda Avenue on the east, Milliken Avenue on the west and Baseline on the south. A portion of the eastern half of LMD 2-R, bordered by Kenyon Avenue on the west to Etiwanda Avenue on the east, extends south of Baseline Road, ending at Church Street. Second, the letter notes in several places that the Rancho Cucamonga City Council hired a consultant to advise and brief residents on the issues at the May 19, 2011 community meeting (one of several held in LMD 2-R). In fact,. the only consultant hired in the entire process is NBS,' to prepare technical documentation, and all community meetings, telephone calls, letters, a-mails and contact with residents has been handled by City staff, including those assigned to the City Manager's Office, the GIS/Special Districts Division and the Public Works Services Department. The two individuals who conducted and spoke on behalf of the City at all public meetings have been the Assistant City Manager and the Public Works Services Director. Third, the letter indicated that at the May 19, 2011 meeting the current situation, where expenses exceed revenues, was classified as a temporary shortfall. In fact, as the information on the City website shows, for three of the last four fiscal years LMD 2 has run a deficit. Staff indicated that with revenues fixed, and costs such as contracts, utilities and personnel gradually increasing over time, the deficit would become a permanent fixture without additional changes to the District. Fourth, the letter referenced that other District's had voted no on similar increases and they had "paid the price" by having their services reduced by the City's Engineering Department, which did so with no oversight of the changes. In fact, maintenance of all the LMD's in the City is handled by the City's Public Works Services Department, not the Engineering Department, and this department is overseen by the Public Works Services Director, who reports to the Assistant City Manager, both of whom were speaking at the May 19, 2011 meeting. As was indicated in the PowerPoint presented at this, and all community meetings, for each and every LMD that has gone through the Prop 218 process in Rancho Cucamonga, a viable alternative to increased assessments is reduced services. The choice, however, is one that is left to the property owners in the District and indeed, several districts have chosen this alternative, some temporarily and some permanently. Fifth, the letter indicates the amount of the tax increase proposed is a million dollars. In fact, the revenue shortfalls in LMD 2-R over the past several years have ranged from $95,000 to $276,000 dollars and the amount of the proposed assessment increase is $183,630 for FY 2011-12. Finally, the letter states that a 9% increase is proposed now followed by a CPI increase of 2% next year. In fact, what is proposed is not a 9% increase now, but rather a change for the December 2011 and April 2012 property tax bills that ranges from a $100 decrease for multi-family properties to a $651.00 an acre increase for commercial/industrial property. Single family properties only would see a $38.00 increase, or approximately 9%. Further, no CPI increase is proposed for the following year. Rather, CPI adjustment language is included, which authorizes a CPI adjustment if costs increase, but the CPI adjustment is limited to only the actual change in the CPI, with a total ceiling of 2.5%. Attachment 1. .June 14, 2011 Letter to Daily Bulletin Lack of faith, trust in Rancho Cuca~on~~z's leaders_ = DailyBulletin.com Page 1 of 2 ., 4~~? ~rL ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ k Lack ®f faith gust ~n reduction in services would look like; they did 9 not appear significant. The consultant anch® Cucam®nga@s I~a~~~"s Victor Muniz Created: 06!14/2011 08:15:31 PM PDT Last month, I received a notice from the city advising of a "community meeting" to "Discuss Rates and Maintenance" in Landscapte Maintenance District No. 2. I reside within this district, bordered basically by the 210 Freeway, Milliken and Etiwanda avenues, and Foothill Boulevard. On May 19, I attended the meeting and learned that the Rancho Cucamonga City Council had hired a consultant to advise and brief us on the issue. Landscape contractors' representatives were in attendance. I signed in and asked for a copy of the agenda and briefing paper on the issue. The city representative had none; I was informed that it was an "economic measure" to maintain costs, but I could get a copy on the R.C. website. So we, the residents, are summoned to a very important meeting to discuss future tax increases and the constituency is uninformed. We left having to rely on what the consultant advises. The consultant delivered a PowerPoint briefing forecasting a gloomy future if we voted "no." One, they don't have enough money from current tax assessments to cover current maintenance costs, and he classified this matter as a "temporary shortfall." Two, if we wanted to maintain the same level of landscape service, then a tax increase was required. And three, if we didn't want a tax increase, they would have to reduce landscape services. They show showed us pictures of what the said the current taxes for landscape service had not been increased in some time, leading one to believe that it was now time to accept a tax increase. Another district had previously voted "no" and it was implied they paid the price. The city Engineering Department reduced services and "conditions went south." I don't believe the photos showed a significant deterioration of landscaped areas and it doesn't appear that anyone was overseeing the department's management of the reduction plan if they made one. When we finally were allowed to ask questions, had a couple, 1, What was the amount of the revenue shortage to justify a "million-dollar tax increase"? 2, Where were our City Council members and why were they not here to brief and discuss this with us. And 3, Why did we not have a copy of the presentation? The city could afford to send a least five people on the payroll to this meeting, but couldn't afford to give us a copy of the brief. The answers received were: 1, The "shortfall was approximately $200,000"; 2, The City Council " couldn't take sides, so they didn't come," and 3, Obtain a copy of the briefing paper on the city's vw.~-_.,.,A. 3Y..u.A .~ t ~ ~~ ~ r ,, Y ~~ "/a F~{us, get 1P~ZElE Gi;F>uy ~ ~'t i r,l~~ j r rr ~~~ ~ r - w, €ti - Print P~werecl By ' _~ .-- t`t"~~ cC?~rrl~~i~s~~~ P273 http://www.dailybulletin.com/ci_18274361?IADID=Search-www.dailybulletin.com-www.... 6/23/2011 Lac1: of faith, trust in Rancho Cucamonga's leaders - DailyBulletin.com being singled out for retribution. P274 website. It didn't take long to figure out that we were "being led down that country road." I countered by asking what options/alternatives" had the city explored to cover this "temporary shortfall," instead of trying to justify a permanent tax increase of over $1 million - an amount more than four times what was needed. They are proposing a "9% increase now, followed by a CPI increase of 2 % beginning next year for a Total of 11 %. Yet, the city has a reported $14 million in reserve, plenty to cover the problem. Truly disappointed by what I had heard and learned, I attended the June 1 City Council meeting. I spoke and told the City Council that the Engineering Department had not done its homework and the council should send it back to them requiring a revised report with options and alternative plans so as not to burden the constituency with this problem. I emphasized that the "temporary shortfall" was not that great in the scheme of things and that it could be fixed with some creative leadership. No response or even a question came forth from the City Council about exploring options and alternatives. It became obvious that they have another agenda to pursue. This was followed to my dismay by their "atta boy, good job" accolade to the consultant. Following what can only be classified as self-serving comments by the council, they then voted unanimously to send it out to the . people, yet, without the people being fully informed or the issue properly reviewed or debated. Sitting. back and listening to their comments and their gestures the first thought that came to mind .was leadership and what they were elected to perform. They in effect had washed their hands of the matter. Folks, this measure for a tax increase is as phony as a $3.bill. I say vote "no, then deliver a demand to the City Council to form a Citizens Committee or assign someone with "leadership" to oversee the Engineering Department's revised landscape maintenance plans and operations for the district, if reduction really is necessary. This action is required to ensure that we are not Page ? of 2 Yes, I have lost faith and trust in our City Council. The impression is that we are just "insignificant suppliants." Don't kid yourself, this measure is well greased. Victor Muniz lives in Rancho Cucamonga. ~.. r _ +sf~ ~_; . ot~~r 41Fl~Y ~uaai~ ~~: or call 1.877.~iU4.i133 Print Powered By °.~.-~=t)'s°{ F ~~l~yn~r-nics _ http://www.dailybulletin.con~/ci_ 18274361 ?IADID=Search-u~ww.dailybulletin.com-www.... 6/23/2011 P275 STAFF REPORT CITY OI' RANCHO CUC ~MONG1~ Date: July 6, 2011 To: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council From: James L. Markman, City Attorney~~.~ Subject: Approval of City Manager Contvvract BACKGROUND On June 9, 2011, the City Manager of Rancho Cucamonga, Jack Lam, announced his retirement effective August 31, 2011. Mr. Lam is retiring after 33 years of distinguished service to Rancho Cucamonga, 22 years of which as City Manager. Mr. Lam was originally hired as the City's first Community Development Director in 1978, later became Assistant City Manager and then was subsequently appointed City Manager in 1989. ANALYSIS In 2006, following a review of information on upcoming changes in the City's workforce demographics, the City Council tasked the City Manager and all City staff with developing succession plans and ensuring that the next generation of local government employees were prepared for potential future opportunities. Following those established succession management practices, after Mr. Lam announced his upcoming retirement, he subsequently suggested that the City Council consider the Assistant City Manager, John Gillison, as a potential replacement for the position of City Manager of Rancho Cucamonga. Mr. Gillison has over 21 years of progressively responsible experience in various management roles with five cities, including serving as Deputy City Manager, Assistant City Manager and City Manager. He has worked in full-service and contract agencies, located in both Los Angeles and San Bernardino County; ranging in size from as small as 10,000 population to as large as 160,000. Additionally, Mr. Gillison has worked in Finance, Community Development, Human Resources and the City Manager's office, with experience in experience in all phases of municipal government, particularly in financial matters, personnel, and risk management which are critical knowledge areas for the effective management of any organization. As City Manager in Sierra Madre, Mr. Gillison was responsible for oversight of all City operations, including fire and police, and reported directly to the City Council. Finally, he has a Bachelor of Arts in Political Science, Master of Public Administration, and a Jurisdoctorate, all well-recognized public sector credentials that demonstrate his commitment to lifelong education. Mr. Gillison is also a resident of Rancho Cucamonga. Mr. Lam has noted in his comments throughout this process that during his time in Rancho Cucamonga, Mr. Gillison has managed many difficult assignments successfully, including the oversight of the City budget and labor negotiations. He has an excellent relationship with the entire executive management team and is respected by the organization. Further, Mr. Gillison actively participates in multiple professional and governmental affairs organizations such as the League of California Cities, several insurance joint powers authorities and the West Valley P276 APPROVAL Of~ CITY IVIt\NAG11.lt CON"I'Rt\C"1' ULY 6, 2011 PnGr. 2 Vector Control District, successfully forging partnerships at the regional level which have, and will continue to, benefit the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Finally, Mr. Gillison's credentials, breadth of experience and knowledge of the City will provide not only valuable continuity, but support Rancho Cucamonga's values of excellence in general. Attachment: Employment Agreement dated September 1, 2011 2. Contract Comparison P277 EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into and shall be effective as of the 1st day of September 2011, by and between the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, California, a Municipal Corporation, hereinafter called the "City," and JOHN ROBERT GILLISON, hereinafter called "Employee." RECITALS A. City desires to retain the services of Employee in the position of City Manager, and Employee desires employment as City Manager of the City; B. The City Council desires to: (1) Retain the services of Employee. (2) Encourage the highest standards of fidelity and public service on the part of Employee. (3) Provide a just means for terminating Employee's employment and this Agreement when City may desire to do so; C. The parties further desire to establish the Employee's conditions of employment. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants hereinafter contained the parties agree as follows: 1. Duties. City hereby employs Employee as City Manager of City, Executive Director of the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency and Appointing Authority of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District to perform the functions and duties of the City Manager, Executive Director and Appointing Authority as specified in City's Municipal Code and to perform such other legally permissible and proper duties and functions as the City Council may from time to time assign to Employee. Employee agrees to devote Employee's full time and effort to the performance of this Agreement and to remain in the exclusive employ of City and not to become otherwise employed while this Agreement is in effect without the prior written approval of the City Council. 2. Hours of Work. Employee shall maintain a regular work schedule consistent with that approved by the City Council for other management employees of the City. Employee's duties may involve expenditures of time in excess often (10) hours per day and/or forty (40) hours per week, and may also include time outside normal office hours such as attendance at City Council meetings. Employee shall not be entitled to additional compensation for such time. 3. Term. This Agreement shall be effective September 1, 2011, and will remain in force and effect until terminated as provided herein. 1369274v1 P278 4. Salary. City shall pay Employee for the performance of Employee's "duties as City Manager under this Agreement a starting monthly salary of $19,992, less customary and legally required payroll deductions. Salary and/or benefit adjustments shall be considered by the City Council annually in conjunction with Employee's annual performance evaluation pursuant to paragraph 8. of this Agreement. Employee shall be eligible for regular annual merit increases in the same amount and manner as provided for other Executive Management employees in the City's Personnel Rules and Regulations and then effective Executive Management Memorandum of Understanding. In addition, Employee shall receive non-merit increases in the same amount and at the same time as that provided to other Executive Management employees. City shall not, at any time during the term of this Agreement, reduce Employee's salary or benefits unless such reduction is imposed across-the-board for all Executive Management employees of the City. 5. Benefits. Employee shall receive the same benefits, including leave accruals and cash out provisions, holidays and other benefits on the same terms and conditions as provided to other Executive Management employees, with the following exceptions: a. Deferred Compensation -City shall contribute 1 % more than the highest amount provided to any other Executive Management employee into both employee's 401 plan and his 457 plan. 6. General Expenses and Business Equipment. City recognizes that certain expenses of anon-personal and job-related nature may be incurred by Employee. City agrees to reimburse Employee for reasonable expenses which are authorized by the City budget and which are supported by expense receipts, statements or personal affidavits, and audit thereof in like manner as other demands against the City. 7. Official and Professional Development Expenses. City shall pay reasonable sums for professional dues and subscriptions for Employee necessary in the judgment of the City Council for Employee's continued participation in associations and organizations, which memberships are necessary and desirable for the continued professional development of Employee and for the good of the City, such as the League of California Cities, International City/County Management Association, American Society for Public .Administration, and California City Management Foundation. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the City Council shall have discretion to establish appropriate amounts, in the annual City budget or otherwise, for official and professional development expenses and travel costs. 8. Performance Evaluation. The City Council shall review and evaluate Employee's performance on or before March 1, 2012 and then at least once annually thereafter. As part of each such evaluation, the City Council and Employee shall develop mutually agreeable performance goals and criteria which the City Council shall use in reviewing Employee's performance in the following year. It shall be Employee's responsibility to initiate each review. Employee shall be afforded an adequate opportunity to discuss each evaluation with the City Council and may request, in advance of the evaluation, that the City retain a facilitator mutually acceptable to the City and Employee, paid for by City, to conduct the evaluation. -2- ]369274v1 P279 9. Indemnification. City shall defend, hold harmless and indemnify Employee against any claim, demand, judgment, or action of any type or kind arising within the course and scope of Employee's employment to the extent required by Government Code Sections 825 and 995. 10. Other Terms and Conditions of Employment. (A) The City Council may from time to time fix other terms and conditions of employment relating to the performance of Employee, provided such terms and conditions are not inconsistent with or in conflict with the provision of this Agreement, the Municipal Code, or other applicable law. (B) The provisions of the City's Personnel Rules and Regulations. ("Rules") shall apply to Employee to the extent they explicitly apply to the position of City Manager, except that if the specific provisions of this Agreement conflict with the Rules, the terms of this Agreement shall prevail. Without limiting the generality of the exception noted in the previous sentence, however, no provision of the Rules or this Agreement shall confer upon Employee a property right in Employee's employment or a right to be discharged only upon cause during Employee's tenure as City Manager. At such times as Employee is serving as City Manager, Employee is an at-will employee serving at the pleasure of the Council and may be dismissed at any time with or without cause, subject only to the provisions of this Agreement. (C) Employee shall be exempt from paid overtime compensation and from Social Security taxes other than the mandatory Medicare portion of such taxes. 11.. General Provisions. (A) This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the parties. City and Employee hereby acknowledge that they have neither made nor accepted any other promise or obligation with respect to the subject matter of this Agreement. This Agreement may be amended only by a writing signed by Employee, approved by the City Council, and executed on behalf of the City. (B) If any provision or any portion of this Agreement is held to be unconstitutional, invalid or unenforceable, the remainder of the Agreement shall be deemed severable and shall not be affected and shall remain in full force and effect. (C) This Agreement may be terminated by City upon delivery of notice to Employee, with or without cause subject only to the requirements of paragraph 12 below. Notice of termination (Employee's resignation) to City shall be given in writing to City, either by personal service or by registered or certified mail, postage prepaid, addressed to City as follows: -3- 1369274v1 P280 Mayor City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Any notice to Employee shall be given in a like manner, and, if mailed, shall be addressed to Employee at the address then shown in City's personnel records. For the purpose of determining compliance with any time limit stated in this Agreement, a notice shall be deemed to have duly given (a) on the date of delivery, if served personally on the party to whom notice is to be given, or (b) on the second (2°d) calendar day after mailing, if mailed in the manner provided in this section to the party to whom notice is to be given. Notwithstanding the forgoing, this Agreement shall automatically terminate on the death or permanent disability of Employee and Employee agrees to give City not less than 30 calendar days' written notice of his resignation. The City also agrees to provide Employee written notice of intent to terminate not less than 30 calendar days of the effective date of his termination. Further, Employee shall not be removed from office, other than for cause or a ground or grounds delineated in Exhibit "A" hereto, during or within a period of ninety days succeeding any general or special municipal election in which a new city councilmember is elected, or when a new city councilmember is appointed. (D) If an action at law or in equity is necessary to enforce or interpret this Agreement, the prevailing party in that action shall be entitled to reasonable and actual attorneys' fees and costs with respect to the prosecution or defense of the action. (E) A waiver of any of the terms and conditions of this Agreement shall not be construed as a general waiver by the City and the City shall be free to enforce any term or condition of this Agreement with or without notice to Employee notwithstanding any prior waiver of that term or condition. 12. Termination and Severance. City may terminate this contract without cause only upon athree-fifths vote of the entire City Council. If City terminates this Contract without such cause as hereinafter defined, then City shall pay Employee the total of nine (9) months plus one (1) additional month for each fiscal year from 2011-2012 to 2013-2014 which Employee completes as City Manager (for a maximum total of twelve months) base salary as severance at or prior to Employee's last day of employment. City may terminate this contract with cause at any time upon athree-fifths vote of the City Council, upon any of the grounds delineated in Exhibit "A" hereto. Employee shall have no right to receive any severance if terminated for cause. -4- 1369274v1 P281 IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties have executed this Agreement as of the day and year first above written. EMPLOYEE John Robert Gillison CITY MANAGER Approved as to form: James Markman CITY ATTORNEY -5- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA L. Dennis Michael MAYOR ATTEST: Jan Reynolds CITY CLERK 1369274v1 P282 EXHIBIT "A" GROUNDS FOR TERMINATION Incompetency such as failure to comply with the minimum standards for Employee's position for a significant period of time. 2. Neglect of duty, such as failure to timely perform the duties required of Employee's position. 3. Dishonesty involving employment. 4. Being under the influence of alcohol or intoxicating drugs while on duty. Addiction to or habitual use of alcoholic beverages, narcotics or any habit forming drug which interferes with Employee's ability to deliver public service. 6. Absence without leave. 7. Conviction of a crime or conduct constituting a violation of state law which interferes with Employee's ability to deliver public service. 8. Improper or unauthorized use of City property. 9. Employee's failure to resolve a physical or mental infirmity(s) or defect(s) affecting job performance when it is within the capacity of the employee to do so. 10. Acceptance from any source of any emolument, reward, gift or other form of remuneration in addition to Employee's regular compensation, as a personal benefit to the employee for actions performed in the normal course of Employee's assigned duties. 11. Falsification of any City report or record or of any report or record required to be, or, filed by Employee. 12. A breach of Employee's employment agreement. -6- 1369274v1 P283 Contract comparison Jack Lam John Gillison $293,280 Base Salary $239,904 $7,200 ~ Auto Allowance $6,000 10% of base Deferred Compensation 7% of base $4,000 Preventive Health Allowance Maximum $2,000 $333,808 TOTAL COMPENSATFON $262,568 $66,414 PERS $54,328 $13,212 .Medical $9,168 $4,253 Medicare $3,479 $543 Life Insurance $465 5% max employee match Optional Deferred Compensation 3%.max employee match $84,422 TOTAL BENEFITS $67,440 All Leave Accruals same as Executive Group 12 months "Safety Net" 9 months ---------------------- TOTAL ANNUAL SAVINGS $93,560 (includes Optional Deferred Comp match) New City Manager has same benefits as Executive Management, except for an additional 1 % on Deferred Compensation and Employee Match