Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2011/08/03 - Agenda Packet
ciry of NCHU ~ CAMUNGA 10500 Civic Center Drive 4 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730-3801 City Office: (909) 477-2700 AGENDAS REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT BOARD CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETINGS 1~ and 3^~ Wednesdays ~ 7:00 P.M. ORDER OF BUSINESS CLOSED SESSION Council Chambers ........................... 5:00 P.M. Call to Order Public Communications Tapia Conference Room Conduct of Closed Session Citv Manaeer Announcements REGULAR MEETING Council Chambers ........................... 7:00 P.M. MEMBERS MAYOR MAYOR PRO TEM COUNCIL MEMBERS L. Dennis Michael Sam Spagnolo William Alexander Chuck Buquet Diane Williams CITY MANAGER CITY ATTORNEY CITY CLERK Jack Lam, AICP James L. Markman Janice C. Reynolds l ~ r INFORMATION FOR THE PUBLIC ~R-1 ^.li ii ~~ Ul.AhtUNGA TO ADDR The Agency, Fire board and City Council encourage free expression of all points of view. To allow all persons to speak, given the length of the Agenda, please keep your remarks brief. ff others have already expressed your position, you may simply indicate that you agree with a previous speaker. If appropriate, a spokesperson may present the views of your entire group. To encourage all views and promote courtesy to others, the audience should refrain from clapping, booing or shouts of approval or disagreement from the audience. The public may address the Agency, Fire Board or City Council by filling out a speaker card and submitting it to the City Clerk. The speaker cards are located on the wall at the back of the Chambers, at the front desk behind the staff table and at the City Clerk's desk. During "Public Communications,°your name will be called to speak on any item Ifsted or not listed on the agenda in the order in which it was received. Kas part of your presentation. you would like to disnlav audio or visual material. please see the City Clerk before the meeting commences. If you are present to speak on an "Advertised Public Hearing" item, your name will be called when that item is being discussed. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by the Chair, depending upon the number of individuals desiring to speak. The public communications period will not exceed one hour prior to the commencement of the business portion of the agenda. During this one hour period, all those who wish to speak on a topic contained in the business portion of the agenda will be given priority, and no further speaker cards for these business items (with the exception of public hearing items) will be accepted once the business portion of the agenda commences. Any other public communications which have not concluded during this one hour period may resume after the regular business portion of the agenda has been completed. Any handouts for the Agency, Fire Hoard or City Council should be given to the City Clerk for distribution Staff reports and back-up materials for agenda items are available for review at the City Clerk's counter, Public Library and on the City's website. A complete copy of the agenda is also available at the desk located behind the staff table during the Council meeting. Agency, Fire Board and Council meetings are broadcast live on Channel 3 for those with cable television access. Meetings are rebroadcast on the second and fourth Wednesdays of each month at 11:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m. The City has added the option for customers without cable access to view the meetings "on-demand" from their computers. The added feature of "Streaming Video On Demand" is available on the City's website at www.cl.rancho- cucamonga.ca.usJwhatsnew.htm for those with Hi-bandwidth (DSUCable Modem) or Low-bandwidth (Dial-up) Internet service. The Agency, Flre Board and City Council meets regularly on the first and third Wednesday of the month at 7:00 p.m. In the Council Chambers located at 10500 Civic Center Drive. Members of the City Council also sft as the Redevelopment Agency and the Fire District Board. Copies of the agendas and minutes can be found at http:llwww.cl.ra»cho-cucamonga.ca.us If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk's office at (909) 477-2700. Not cation of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired. Please turn off atl cellular phones and pagers while the meeting is in session. ~, REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, ~'~' -' FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AND 1 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ~~ ~ ~ <<~,,~~~~~~~~ AUGUST 3, 2011 A. 5:00 P.M. -CLOSED SESSION CALL TO ORDER -COUNCIL CHAMBERS A1. Roll Call: Ma or Michael Y Mayor Pro Tem Spagnolo Council Members Alexander, Buquet and Williams CLOSED SESSION CALLED TO ORDER AS THE COUNCIL. B. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS ON CLOSED SESSION ITEM S C. RECESS ~. CONDUCT OF CLOSED SESSION - TAPIA CONFERENCE ROOM D1. CONFERENCE WITH PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED AT 8408 ROCHESTER AVENUE; NEGOTIATING PARTIES: KEVIN MCARDLE, COMMUNITY SERVICES DIRECTOR, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA; AND BOBBY BRETT, RANCHO BASEBALL, LLC, REGARDING POTENTIAL LEASE EXTENSION -City D2. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL REGARDING PENDING LITIGATION PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.9(A) -DALE NELSON AND JEANNE NELSON V. SANDRA KENT, MICHAEL FERNANDEZ, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA; COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, AND DOES 1 THROUGH 10 INCLUSIVE; CASE NO. CIVRS 913680 - Ciry D3. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL REGARDING PUBLIC EMPLOYEE DISCIPLINE/RELEASE PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54957. D4. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL REGARDING ANTICIPATED LITIGATION PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.9(b) -ONE CASE. E. CITY MANAGER ANNOUNCEMENTS F. RECESS CLOSED SESSION TO RECESS TO THE REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING AT 7:00 P.M. IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS AT CITY HALL, LOCATED AT 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA. ;!~ e, K![ ~~I i i r LOCAMUNGA AUGUST 3, 2011 2 CALL TO ORDER - 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL THE REGULAR MEETINGS OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AND CITY COUNCIL WILL BE CALLED TO ORDER. IT IS THE INTENT TO CONCLUDE THE MEETINGS BY 10:00 P.M., UNLESS EXTENDED BY CONCURRENCE OF THE AGENCY, FIRE BOARD AND COUNCIL. G1. Pledge of Allegiance G2. Roll Call: Mayor Michael REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AND CITY COUNCIL AGENDA Mayor Pro Tem Spagnolo Council Members Alexander, Buquet and Williams H1. Presentation to Jce Cusimano for his years of service as Captain, Rancho Cucamonga Police Department. H2. Announcement of Hula Hounds Adoption Promotions H3. Recap of First Fire District Junior Firefighter Academy. This is the time and place for the general public to address the Redevelopment Agency, Fire Protection District and City Council on any item listed or not Ilsted on the agenda. State law prohibits the Agency, Fire Board, or City Council from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Agency, Fire Board, or City Council may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by the Chair, depending upon the number of individuals desiring to speak. All communications are to be addressed directly to the Agency, Fire Board or City Council, not to the members of the audience. This is a professional business meeting and courtesy and decorum are expected. Please refrain from any debate between audience and speaker, making loud noises, or engaging in any activity which might be disruptive to the decorum of the meeting. The public communications period will not exceed one hour prior to the commencement of the buslness portion of the agenda. During this one hour period, all those who wish to speak on a topic contained in the business portion of the agenda will be given priority, and no further speaker cards for these business items (with the exception of public hearing items) will be accepted once the business portion of the agenda commences. Any other public communications which have not concluded during this one hour period may resume after the regular business portion of the agenda has been completed. The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non-controversial They will be acted upon by the Agency/Board/City Council at one time without discussion. Any item may be removed by an Agency/Board/Council Member for discussion. REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AND CITY COUNCIL AGENDA AUGUST 3, 2011 3 ~~ ~. CONSENT CALENDAR -REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ~~ J1. Approval of Minutes: July 20, 2011 (Regular Meeting) 1 J2. Approval of Check Register dated July 13 through July 26, 2011, for the total amount of $148,127.00. J3. Approval of Cooperative Agreement (RA 11-013) between the City of Fontana and the City of Rancho Cucamonga for reimbursement of costs for certain improvements associated with the East Avenue Master Plan Storm Drain Line 8 Project and authorize the Chairman to sign said Cooperative Agreement. ~~ K. CONSENT CALENDAR -FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT K1. Approval of Minutes: July 20, 2011 (Regular Meeting) K2. Approval of Check Register dated July 13 through July 26, 2011, for the total amount of $217,178.63. L1. Approval of Minutes: July 20, 2011 (Regular Meeting) L2. Approval of Check Register dated July 13 through July 26, 2011, and payroll ending July 26, 2011, for the total amount of $5,015,981.46. L3. Approval to authorize the advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bids' for the FY 2011/12 Local Street Pavement Rehabilitation -Overlay of Various Streets, to be funded from Gas Tax RT 7360, Account No. 11743035650/1022174-0 for construction of said project. RESOLUTION NO. 11-131 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE FY 2011!12 LOCAL STREET PAVEMENT REHABILITATION -OVERLAY OF VARIOUS STREETS, IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS 2 4 8 44 46 -'= ` _ ~~ ~ ~ ~~ ,<<,~,,M~~~~ REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AND CITY COUNCIL AGENDA AUGUST 3, 2011 4 L4. Approval to authorize the advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bids" for the FY 2011/12 Local 50 Street Pavement Rehabilitation -Slurry Seal of Various Streets, to be funded from Gas Tax RT 7360, Account No. 11743035650/1022174-0 for construction of said project. RESOLUTION NO. 11-132 52 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE FY 2011/12 LOCAL STREET PAVEMENT REHABILITATION -SLURRY SEAL OF VARIOUS STREETS, IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS L5. Approval of an Amended and Restated Joint Use Agreement (CO 11-114) by and between 56 the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Cha/tey Joint Union High School District relating to Community Services activities. L6. Approval to accept grant revenue in the amount of $71,013.00 awarded by the California 71 Emergency Management Agency (FY 2010 Homeland Security Grant), and administered by the San Bernardino County Fire Department, Office of Emergency Services to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District into Account 1380000-4740 (Grant Income). L7. Approval to accept the Hermosa Avenue Community Trail and Parkway Landscape from 72 Lemon to 200' north of Manzanita Drive and Trail Fencing on Archibald Avenue, Contract No. 11-003 as complete, release the bonds, accept a Maintenance Bond, and authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and approve the final contact amount of $246,390.11. RESOLUTION NO. 11-133 75 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE HERMOSA AVENUE COMMUNITY TRAIL AND PARKWAY LANDSCAPE FROM LEMON AVENUE TO 200' NORTH OF MANZANITA DRIVE AND TRAIL FENCING ON ARCHIBALD AVENUE, CONTRACT NO. 11-003 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK L8. Approval of Resolutions initiating proceedings to levy annual assessments, preliminarily 76 approve the annual Engineer's Report, declaring the City Council's intention to levy annual assessments within Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 for Fiscal Year 2011/12 and setting the time and place for a public hearing thereon. NO INCREASE OF ASSESSMENT RATE FOR FY 2011/12 IS PROPOSED. RESOLUTION NO. 11-134 78 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE PREPARATION OF ANNUAL ENGINEER'S REPORT PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE ASSESSMENT LAW FOR PROCEEDINGS FOR THE ANNUAL ASSESSMENT LEVY WITHIN LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2011/12 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AND CITY COUNCIL AGENDA AUGUST 3, 2011 5 RESOLUTION NO. 11-135 80 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, PRELIMINARILY APPROVING THE ANNUAL ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR THE ANNUAL LEVY OF ASSESSMENTS WITHIN LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS NO.2 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2011/2012 RESOLUTION NO. 11-136 82 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO PROVIDE FOR THE ANNUAL LEVY AND COLLECTION OF ASSESSMENTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2011/2012 IN LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 AND SETTING A TIME AND PLACE FOR A PUBLIC HEARING THEREON M. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS CITY COUNCIL The following items have been advertised and/or posted as public hearings as required by law. The Mayor will open the meeting to receive public testimony. M1. CONSIDERATION TO APPROVE THE RESOLUTION CONFIRMING THE DIAGRAMS 116 AND ASSESSMENTS, APPROVE THE ANNUAL ENGINEER'S REPORTS AND ORDER THE LEVY AND COLLECTION OF ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS FOR LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO'S. 1. 3A, 3B, 4-R, 5. 7. 8. 9, AND 10 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2011-2012. NO INCREASE OF THE ASSESSMENT RATE IS PROPOSED. RESOLUTION NO. 11-137 120 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONFIRMING THE DIAGRAMS AND ASSESSMENTS, APPROVING THE ANNUAL ENGINEER'S REPORTS AND ORDERING THE LEVY AND COLLECTION OF THE ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS WITHIN LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO'S. 1, 3A, 3B, 4-R, 5, 7, 8, 9, AND 10 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2011/2012 M2. CONSIDERATION TO APPROVE THE RESOLUTION CONFIRMING THE DIAGRAM 334 AND ASSESSMENT. APPROVE THE ANNUAL ENGINEER'S REPORT. AND ORDER THE LEVY AND COLLECTION OF THE ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS WITHIN PARK AND RECREATION IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. PD-85 FOR FISCAL YEAR 201112012. NO INCREASE OF THE ASSESSMENT RATE IS PROPOSED. ~t nfi °(±i~ ~.~1C AMUNGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AND CITY COUNCIL AGENDA AUGUST 3, 2011 6 RESOLUTION NO. 11-138 336 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONFIRMING THE DIAGRAM AND ASSESSMENT, APPROVING THE ANNUAL ENGINEER'S REPORT AND PROVIDING FOR THE LEVY AND COLLECTION OF ASSESSMENTS WITHIN PARK AND RECREATION IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. PD-85 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2011/2012 PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 M3. CONSIDERATION TO APPROVE THE RESOLUTION CONFIRMING THE DIAGRAMS 348 AND ASSESSMENTS, APPROVE THE ANNUAL ENGINEER'S REPORTS AND ORDER THE LEVY AND COLLECTION OF ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS WITHIN STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO'S. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 AND 8 FOR FISCAL YEAR 201112012. NO INCREASE OF THE ASSESSMENT RATE IS PROPOSED. RESOLUTION NO. 11-139 352 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONFIRMING THE DIAGRAMS AND ASSESSMENTS, APPROVING THE ANNUAL ENGINEER'S REPORTS AND ORDERING THE LEVY AND COLLECTION OF THE ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS WITHIN STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO'S. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 AND 8 FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2011/2012 N. CITY MANAGERS STAFF REPORTS The following items have no legal publication or posting requirements. N1. CONSIDERATION OF AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING A PERMIT PROCESS FOR 443 DESIGNATED PARADES AND ASSEMBLIES WITHIN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 446 ORDINANCE NO. 849 (first reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADDING CHAPTER 44 TO TITLE 8 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING A PARADES AND ASSEMBLIES ORDINANCE N2. CONSIDERATION TO ADOPT AN ORDINANCE COMPLYING WITH ABX1 27, WHICH PROVIDES FOR THE CONTINUED OPERATION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA 455 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, AND AUTHORIZATION TO REMIT TO THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO AUDITOR-CONTROLLER $27,076,930 (ESTIMATE) IN FISCAL YEAR 2011-12 AND $6,500,000 (ESTIMATE) IN FISCAL YEAR 2012-13. REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AND CITY COUNCIL AGENDA AUGUST 3, 2011 7 ORDINANCE N0.850 (first reading) 462 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DETERMINING IT WILL COMPLY WITH THE VOLUNTARY ALTERNATIVE REDEVELOPMENT PROGRAM PURSUANT TO PART 1.9 OF DIVISION 24 OF THE CALIFORNIA HEALTH AND SAFETY CODE IN ORDER TO PERMIT THE CONTINUED EXISTENCE AND OPERATION OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY N3. UPDATE ON FOOTHILL BOULEVARD CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT 466 N4. CONSIDERATION OF A MODIFICATION TO THE FIRST-TIME HOME BUYER 468 PROGRAM REMOVING THE REQUIREMENT THAT HOMES PURCHASED BE RESTRICTED TO BANK OWNED FORECLOSURES O. COUNCIL BUSINESS The following items have been requested by the City Council for discussion. 01. COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS (Comments to be limited to three minutes per Council --- Member.) 02. LEGISLATIVE AND REGIONAL UPDATES (Oral ReuorU -- P. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING Q. ADJOURNMENT i I, Debra L. McKay, Assistant City Clerk/Records Manager, of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on July 28, 2011, seventy-two (72) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive. July 20, 2011 RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, FIRE DISTRICT AND CITY COUNCIL CLOSED SESSION MINUTES A. CALL TO ORDER The Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency held a closed session on Wednesday, July 20, 2011, in the Council Chambers at the Civic Center located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. The meeting was called to order at 5:00 p.m. by Chairman L. Dennis Michael. Present were Agency Members: Bill Alexander, Diane Williams, Mayor Pro Tem Sam Spagnolo and Mayor L. Dennis Michael. Also present were: John Gillison, Assistant City Manager; Debra McKay, Rewrds Manager/Assistant City Clerk and Shirr'I Griffin, Deputy City Clerk. B. ANNOUNCEMENT OF CLOSED SESSION ITEM S The Assistant City Clerk/Records Manager announced the closed session item: D1. CONFERENCE WITH PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR UPDATE ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF ETIWANDA AVENUE, NORTH OF BASE LINE ROAD (COMMONLY REFERRED TO AS THE ETIWANDA DEPOT); NEGOTIATING PARTIES: LINDA D. DANIELS, DEPUTY CITY MANAGER FOR ECONOMIC AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES, FOR THE CITY, AND MITCH ALDERMAN, DIRECTOR OF TRANSIT AND RAIL SYSTEMS, FOR SANBAG -RDA C. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS ON CLOSED SESSION ITEM S Bill Hanlon inquired on the items that could be considered in Closed Session. D. RECESS The closed session recessed at 5:05 p.m. to the Tapia Room. E. CONDUCT OF CLOSED SESSION - TAPIA ROOM Closed session began at 5:10 p.m. Present were Agency Members: Bill Alexander, Diane Williams, Mayor Pro Tem Sam Spagnolo and Mayor L. Dennis Michael. Also present were: D. Craig Fox, Deputy City Attorney; John Gillison, Assistant City Manager and Linda Daniels, Deputy City Manager. Redevelopment Agency, Fire Protection District, City Council Minutes July 20, 2011 -Page 1 of 11 E. CITY MANAGER ANNOUNCEMENTS No announcements were made. F. RECESS The closed session recessed at 6:30 p.m. with no action taken. G. REGULAR MEETING CALL TO ORDER - 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS The meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency, Fire Protection District, and City Council reconvened in the Council Chambers of the Civic Center located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Chairman/PresidenUMayor L. Dennis Michael called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. Present were Agency Members/Board Members/Council Members: Bill Alexander, Chuck Buquet, Diane Williams, Vice Chairman/Vice PresidenUMayor Pro Tem Sam Spagnolo and ChairmanlPresidenUMayor L. Dennis Michael. Also present were: D. Craig Fox, Deputy City Attorney; John Gillison, Assistant City Manager; Linda Daniels, Deputy City Manager; Trang Huynh, Building and Safety Services Director; Chris Paxton, Human Resources Director; Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director; Bill Wittkopf, Public Works Director; James Troyer, Planning Director; Mark Steuer, Director of Engineering Services; Joe Pulcinella, Animal Services Director; Police Chief Joe Cusimano; Robert Karatsu, Library Director; Fire Chief Mike Bell; Janice Reynolds, City Clerk; Debra McKay, Records Manager/Assistant City Clerk and Shirr'I Griffin, Deputy City Clerk. (Item M1 (Landscape Maintenance District No. 2-R) was considered at this time but the comments and actions are shown in the order that it was listed on the agenda.) H. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS H1. Presentation of a Proclamation to Antonio Karraa recognizing his Years of Service as a Park and Recreation Commissioner. Mayor Michael presented a proclamation to Antonio Karraa in appreciation of his years of service on the Park and Recreation Commission. H2. Announcement of the Putt for Paws Miniature Goff Tournament at Boomers on Saturday, August 13th to raise funds for PAW Love and the Animal Care and Adoption Center. Joe Pulcinella, Animal Care and Services Director, and Suzanne Buquet, Founder/President of P.A.W. Love, announced the Putt for Paws Miniature Golf Tournament. ~~ I. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS ~~ 11. Fabian Villenas, Principal Management Analyst, provided an update on the proposed redistricting maps. As a result of the Council's action at the last meeting, Mr. Villenas indicated that the latest Senate map has been adjusted so that the entire City is located in one District. The latest Assembly map still shows a portion of the City in a second District. Mr. Villenas highlighted information at the City's Internet site, www.CityofRC.us. Redevelopment Agency, Fire Protection DisVict, City Council Minutes July 20, 2011 -Page 2 of 11 12. Ed Dietl announced the Cucamonga Classic Car Show, to be held on July 30, 2011 at the Magic Lamp Inn. 13. John Lyons welcomed Mr. Gillison as the new City Manager. He spoke about a recent trip across country and the presence of homeland security at the State borders. 14. Bill Hanlon addressed Freedom Courtyard. He noted that when it was envisioned, the project estimate was $50,000 and is now $250,000. Mr. Hanlon had requested information regarding the cost estimates and provided several documents. The second document indicated that the estimated cost for a flagpole was $7,500. Mr. Hanlon noted that a flagpole could be purchased and installed for around $1,800. He requested that the estimates be reviewed. 18. Jim Moffatt concurred that the cost estimates were a concern. He had read an article in the newspaper about a bridge opening and was disappointed that it was not in the City. Mr. Moffatt provided pictures of the Foothill Boulevard project and indicated that the restrooms should not have been constructed first. Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director, addressed Freedom Courtyard and the concerns raised by Mr. Hanlon. CONSENT CALENDARS: The following items are expected to be routine and non-controversial. They will 6e acted upon by the Agency/Board/City Council at one time without discussion. Any item may 6e removed by an Agency/Board/Council Member for discussion. J. CONSENT CALENDAR -REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY J1. Approval of Minutes: July 6, 2011 (Regular Meeting) J2. Approval of Check Register dated June 29 through July 12, 2011, for the total amount of $2,142,012.72. J3. Approve to receive and file current Investment Schedule as of June 30, 2011. MOTION: Moved by Spagnolo, seconded by Alexander, to approve the staff recommendations in the staff reports. Motion carried 5-0. K. CONSENT CALENDAR -FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT K1. Approval of Minutes: July 6, 2011 (Regular Meeting) K2. Approval of Check Register dated June 29 through July 12, 2011, for the total amount of $101,230.33. K3. Approval to receive and file current Investment Schedule as of June 30, 2011. Redevelopment Agency, Fire Protection District, City Council Minutes July 20, 2011 -Page 3 of 11 K4. Approval of annual, Citywide agreement with Southern Counties Oil Company DBA SC Fuels to provide gasoline and diesel fuel, utilizing the Cooperative Purchasing Network Contract Number R5060, funded by Account Numbers 1001317-5255 (Fleet), 1001317-5256 (Fleet), 1001701-5255 (Police Department), 3281-527-5255 (Fire District), and 3281527- 5256 (Fire District), in annual amounts as per the adopted budget, and authorize continued utilization of said contract in accordance with their specked expiration dates.. K5. Approval to renew contract (CO 03-084) on a month-to-month basis with no cost increase for Fiscal Year 2011-12 with Emcor Service/Mesa Energy Systems, Inc. (Emcor Service), California, for HVAC/Control work and related energy management systems in the amount of $215,786 for City facilities and $22,640 for Fire District facilities; approve extra repair work for City facilities not to exceed $214,985; and perform indoor air quality modifications as needed at City-wide facilities not to exceed $10,000; for City and Fire DisVict facilities, to be funded from 1001312-5304, 1025001-5304, 1700201-5304, 3281511-5300, 3281512-5300, 3281515-5300, 3281527-5300, 3282513-5300, 3282514-5300, 3282527-5300 and 3283516-5300. MOTION: Moved by Spagnolo, seconded by Buquet, to approve the staff recommendations in the staff reports. Motion carried 5-0. L. CONSENT CALENDAR -CITY COUNCIL L1. Approval of Minutes: July 06, 2011 (Regular Meeting) L2. Approval of Check Register dated June 29 through July 12, 2011, and payroll ending July 12, 2011, for the total amount of $3,685,343.51. L3. Approval to receive and file current Investment Schedule as of June 30, 2011. L4. Approval for the release of State Asset Seizure Fund in the amount of $35,000 to be utilized for the Campus Awareness Narcotic Intervention Narcotic Education (C.A.N.I.N.E) programs in local schools. L5. Approval and appropriation of funds received from the County of San Bernardino, Department of Aging and Adult Services, for a Senior Supportive Services -Older Americans Act Title III B Grant in the amount of $6,000 (Revenue Fund Account: 1258000-4740 Expenditure Fund Account: 1258401-5300) (ConVact No. 11-098). L6. Receive Community Services Update Report. L7. Approval to waive various fees and charges for the Rancho Cucamonga Chamber of Commerce's Grape Harvest Festival and Carnival scheduled for August 19-21, 2011, at the Rancho Cucamonga Epicenter. L8. Approval of annual, Citywide agreement with Southern Counties Oil Company DBA SC Fuels to provide gasoline and diesel fuel, utilizing the Cooperative Purchasing Network Contract Number R5060, funded by Account Numbers 1001317-5255 (Fleet), 1001317-5256 (Fleet), 1001701-5255 (Police Department), 3281-527-5255 (Fire District), and 3281527- 5256 (Fire District), in annual amounts as per the adopted budget, and authorize continued utilization of said contract in accordance with their specified expiration dates. Redevelopment Agency, Fire Protection District, City Council Minutes July 20, 2011 -Page 4 of 11 L9. Approval to renew conVact (CO 03-084) on a month-to-month basis with no cost increase for Fiscal Year 2011-12 with Emcor Service/Mesa Energy Systems, Inc. (Emcor Service), California, for HVAC/ConVol work and related energy management systems in the amount of $215,786 for City facilities and $22,640 for Fire DisVict facilities; approve exVa repair work for City facilities not to exceed $214,985; and perform indoor air quality modifications as needed at Citywide facilities not to exceed $10,000; for City and Fire District facilities, to be funded from 1001312-5304, 1025001-5304, 1700201-5304, 3281511-5300, 3281512-5300, 3281515-5300, 3281527-5300, 3282513-5300, 3282514-5300, 3282527-5300 and 3283516-5300. L10. Approval to renew contact (CO 06-180) on a month-to-month basis with no cost increase for Fiscal Year 2011-12 with ABM Janitorial Services for the cleaning of City-wide facilities in an annual amount of $670,532 ($547,662 contract plus $22,870 extra work allowance and $100,000 in supplies), to be funded from Account Numbers 1001312-5304 (Facilities Maintenance) and 1700201-5304 (Sports Complex). L11. Approval to renew contract (CO 07-124) on a month-to-month basis with no cost increase for Fiscal Year 2011-12 with Ellis Enterprises of Los Alamitos, California, for window cleaning services for various City facilities in an annual amount of $71,160 plus $10,000 extra work, to be funded from 1001312-5304 (Facilities Maintenance). L12. Approval to renew contract (CO 09-220) with no cost increase for Fiscal Year 2011-2012 with Republic ITS, Inc. of Novato, California, for Citywide traffic signal maintenance in an annual amount of $543,810 ($145,248 annual contract plus $398,562 extra work allowance), to be funded from Account Number 1177303-5300 (Measure 12010-2040). L13. Approval to renew conUact (CO 10-154) and Amendment No. 1 with no cost increase for Fiscal Year 2011-2012 with Contact Security, Inc., of Brea, California, for security guard services to be conducted at various Ciry facilities in an annual amount of $334,035 ($309,035 annual contract plus $25,000 contingency), to be funded from 1001312-5304 (Facilities Maintenance) 1133303-5304 (Landscape Maintenance District 36), 1290606-5300 (Archibald Library) and 1700201-5304 (Sports Complex). L14. Approval to renew contract (CO 08-162) with no cost increase for Fiscal Year 2011-2012 with United Pack Service, Inc. (UPS) of La Habra, California, for City-wide Vee maintenance services in an annual amount of $492,420, to be funded from various city accounts as approved in the Fiscal Year 2011-2012 budget. L15. Approval to release Faithful Pertormance Bond No. 350170P, retained in lieu of Maintenance Guarantee Bond in the amount of $64,660, for the Citywide Street Name Sign Replacement - FY 09/10, Contract No. CO 10-001. MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by Spagnolo, to approve the staff recommendations in the staff reports. Motion carried 5-0. M. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS CITY COUNCIL The following items have been advertised and/or posted as public hearings as required by law. The Mayor will open the meeting to receive public testimony. M1. CONSIDERATION OF ALTERNATE FORMS OF RESOLUTIONS TO DECLARE THE Redevelopment Agency, Fire Protection District, City Council Minutes July 20, 2011 -Page 5 of 11 RESOLUTION NO. 11-114 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING THE RESULTS OF THE ASSESSMENT BALLOT TABULATION, APPROVING THE ENGINEER'S REPORT, FORMING LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2-R, ORDERING MAINTENANCE WORK THEREIN, CONFIRMING THE DIAGRAM AND ASSESSMENT AND PROVIDING FOR THE LEVY OF AN ANNUAL ASSESSMENT THEREIN RESOLUTION NO. 11-115 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING THE RESULTS OF THE ASSESSMENT BALLOT TABULATION IN PROPOSED LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2-R, DETERMINING THE EXISTENCE OF A MAJORITY PROTEST AND ABANDONING THE PROCEEDINGS TO FORM SUCH LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT AND TO LEVY ASSESSMENTS THEREIN Janice Reynolds, City Clerk, indicated that the notice of the public hearing and the distribution of the assessment ballots has been completed in the manner and form required by law. John Gillison, Assistant City Manager, presented the staff report. In response to Mayor Pro Tem Spagnolo, the Assistant City Manager addressed the proposed assessments and why the assessment rate for single family residential properties differs from condominiums. In response to Council Member Buquet, Mr. Gillison commended on the requirement that all properties in a District be equally and proportionately assessed and the water rate increases since 1996. Mr. Gillison also addressed the funding cycle in this District and the importance of reserves. Mayor Michael opened the public hearing. Jerie Lee expressed concerns with the maintenance being done to the landscaping along Day Creek. She noted that the maintenance being provided was never at an "A" level and was allowed to deteriorate even though concerns had frequently been expressed. Mrs. Lee did not support the proposed increase in the assessment. Victor Muniz noted that the City Council should have addressed this matter in another way. He believed that the City Council members should have responded to the concerns that had been raised. Mr. Muniz did not support the proposed assessment and hoped that alternatives would be considered. Bill Hanlon expressed concerns with an article in the newspaper which stated that the business vote would count more than the residential vote. He inquired if schools, Fire Departments and churches have an equal vote. Mr. Hanlon indicated that the weighted votes were very confusing and opposed the need to assess a church. Redevelopment Agency, Fire Protection District, City Council Minutes July 20, 2011 -Page 6 of 11 John Lyons spoke in support of the assessment. When these districts were formed, the Council was opposed to creating homeowner's associations and wanted to ensure that the City remained beautiful. Priscilla Kanea expressed a concern with the proposed cost of living inflator. At the community meetings, she was told that staff would listen to resident's preferences and she did not hear someone request a 2 I/2% inflator. Ms. Kanea expected that this inflator would be charged each year regardless of the need. Also, regarding the water costs, she noted that the City should have taken steps years ago to put in xeriscape landscaping in order to reduce water consumption. Lastly, Ms. Kanea noted that she will be paying double if schools are fire stations are charged. In response to Ms. Kanea, Mr. Gillison noted that the provisions of Proposition 218 require that the votes are counted in proportion to the dollar amount paid by a property owner. He indicated to Mayor Pro Tem Spagnolo that the voters approved Proposition 218. Mr. Gillison addressed the proposed inflator in response to Council Member Buquet. Mr. Gillison indicated that the inflator was initially proposed at 3 I/2% but was reduced to 2 Ill % as a result of the community meetings. Council Member Buquet noted that he is looking at 15 items on the agenda tonight which contain provisions for an automatic inflator. No increases to the current rate are being proposed in any of these Community Facilities Districts. In response to Mayor Michael, Mr. Gillison addressed the maintenance of the landscaping along Day Creek. Mr. Gillison noted that the landscaping was never maintained at an "F" level of service. However, the District was struggling and the maintenance was lowered to a "C" level for about a year and a half. A rebidding process was completed, which resulted in a cost savings and the level of maintenance became more frequent. However, Mr. Gillison noted that it takes time for the landscaping to return to the "A" level. Mr. Gillison confirmed to Council Member Buquet that the City Attorney had advised that the Council remain neutral throughout this process. Proposition 218 requires that the property owners state their preference on the appropriate level of assessment and landscaping in this District. Mayor Michael reminded the audience that all assessment ballots and replacement assessment ballots must be received by the City Clerk prior to the end of the public hearing. Ballots received after the public hearing is closed will not be tabulated. He encouraged property owners to turn in their ballots at this time. Mayor Michael closed the public hearing and requested that the City Clerk tabulate the ballots. Once the ballots are tabulated, the City Clerk was requested to report back to the City Council. (At this time, the remaining items on the agenda were considered by the City Council). Recess: Mayor Michael recessed the meeting at 9:25 p.m. Reconvene: Mayor Michael reconvened the meeting at 10:44 p.m. with all Council Members present. City Clerk Janice Reynolds stated the following: 6,395 assessment ballots were mailed to the property within the proposed boundaries of the Landscape Maintenance District and 2,046 of those assessment ballots were received prior to the close of the public hearing. 559 assessment ballots representing $453,916.50 of assessments were submitted in support of the levy of the proposed assessments within the Assessment District. This is 40% of the ballots received. The City Clerk announced that 1,457 assessment ballots representing $678,354.03 of assessments were submitted in opposition to the levy of the proposed assessments within the Assessment District. This is 60% of the ballots received. Redevelopment Agency, Fire Protection District, City Council Minutes July 20, 2011 -Page 7 of 11 John Gillison, Assistant City Manager, stated that a majority protest existed for Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 and recommended that Resolution No. 11-115 be adopted. He reported that a staff report would be prepared for a later meeting outlining the available options to the City Council. Mr. Gillison noted that a card would be mailed to the property owners notifying them of the election results and of the date of the meeting in which the alternatives would be discussed. MOTION: Moved by Alexander, seconded by Spagnolo, to adopt Resolution No. 11-115. Motion carried 5-0. N. CITY MANAGERS STAFF REPORTS ' CITY COUNCIL The following items have no legal publication or posting requirements. Items N1 through N75 were considered at one time. N1. APPROVAL TO MAINTAIN LEVY FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-2 (DRAINAGE AND LAW ENFORCEMENT) WITH NO INCREASE TO THE CURRENT RATE RESOLUTION NO. 11-116 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RE-ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-2 (DRAINAGE AND LAW ENFORCEMENT) N2. APPROVAL TO SET ANNUAL BENEFIT ASSESSMENTS FOR DRAINAGE AREA NO. 91- ~DAY CANYON DRAINAGE BASINI WITH NO INCREASE TO THE CURRENT RATE RESOLUTION NO. 11-117 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DETERMINING THE COST OF SERVICE TO BE FINANCED BY BENEFIT ASSESSMENTS TO BE LEVIED IN DRAINAGE AREA NO. 91-2 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2011-2012 AND DETERMINING AND IMPOSING SUCH BENEFIT ASSESSMENTS N3. APPROVAL TO SET ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO.93-3 (FOOTHILL MARKETPLACEI WITH NO INCREASE TO THE CURRENT RATE RESOLUTION NO. 11-118 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RE-ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 93-3 (FOOTHILL MARKETPLACE) N4. APPROVAL TO SET ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT N0.2000-01 (SOUTH ETIWANDAI WITH NO INCREASE TO THE CURRENT RATE RESOLUTION NO. 11-119 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RE-ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2000-01 (SOUTH ETIWANDA) Redevelopment Agency, Fire Protection District, City Council Minutes July 20, 2011 -Page 8 of 11 N5. RESOLUTION NO. 11-120 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RE-ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2000-02 (RANCHO CUCAMONGA CORPORATE PARK) N6. APPROVAL TO SET ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2000-03A (RANCHO SUMMIT) WITH NO INCREASE TO THE CURRENT RATE RESOLUTION NO. 11-121 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, PROVIDING FOR THE LEVY OF SPECIAL TAX "A" FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2000- 03A (RANCHO SUMMIT) FOR TAX YEAR 2011-2012 N7. RESOLUTION NO. 11-122 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, PROVIDING FOR THE LEVY OF SPECIAL TAX "B" FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2000- 036 (RANCHO SUMMIT) FOR TAX YEAR 2011-2012 TO FINANCE THE OPERATION OF AND MAINTENANCE OF PARKS AND PARKWAYS N8. APPROVAL TO SET ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2001-01 (IMPROVEMENT AREA NO'S. 1 8 21 SERIES 2001-A WITH NO INCREASE TO THE CURRENT RATE RESOLUTION NO. 11-123 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RE-ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2001-01 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2011-2012 (IMPROVEMENT AREA NO'S. 1 & 2), SERIES 2001-A Ng. RESOLUTION NO. 11-124 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RE-ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 2001-01 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2011-2012 (IMPROVEMENT AREA NO. 3 ZONE 7), SERIES 2001-B Redevelopment Agency, Fire Protection District, City Council Minutes July 20, 2011 -Page 9 of 11 N10. APPROVAL TO SET ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2003-01 (IMPROVEMENT AREA NO. 1, ZONES 1. 2 & 31, SERIES 2003-A WITH NO INCREASE TO THE CURRENT RATE RESOLUTION NO. 11-125 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RE-ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2003-01 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2011-2012 (IMPROVEMENT AREA NO. 1 ZONES 1, 2 & 3), SERIES 2003-A N11. APPROVAL TO SET ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2003-01 (IMPROVEMENT AREA NO. 2 ZONES 1. & 2). SERIES 2003-B WITH NO INCREASE TO THE CURRENT RATE RESOLUTION NO. 11-126 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RE-ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2003-01 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2011-2012 (IMPROVEMENT AREA NO. 2 ZONES 1 & 2), SERIES 2003-B N12. RESOLUTION NO. 11-127 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RE-ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2004-01 (RANCHO ETIWANDA ESTATES) FOR FISCAL YEAR 2011-2012 N13. APPROVAL TO SET ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2006-01 (VINTNER'S GROVEL WITH NO INCREASE TO THE CURRENT RATE RESOLUTION NO. 11-128 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RE-ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2006-01 (VINTNER'S GROVE) FOR FISCAL YEAR 2011-2012 N14. APPROVAL TO SET ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2006-02 (AMADOR ON ROUTE 661 WITH NO INCREASE TO THE CURRENT RATE RESOLUTION NO. 11-129 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RE-ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2006-02 (AMADOR ON ROUTE 66) FOR FISCAL YEAR 2011-2012 N15. APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING AN ANNUAL LEVY WITHIN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 93-1. (MAST PLAZA) AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF ROCHESTER AVENUE AND FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND REASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 1999-1 WITH NO INCREASE TO THE CURRENT RATE Redevelopment Agency, Fire Protection District, City Council Minutes July 20, 2011 -Page 10 of 11 RESOLUTION NO. 11-130 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RE-AUTHORIZING THE LEVY OF AN ASSESSMENT SURCHARGE FOR THE EXPENSES INCURRED IN THE COLLECTION OF ASSESSMENTS IN VARIOUS SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS John Gillison, Deputy City Manager, presented the staff reports for Items N1 through N15. MOTION: Moved by Spagnolo, seconded by Williams, to adopt Resolution Nos. 11-016 to 11-130. Motion carcied 5-0. N16. LIBRARY UPDATE -SUMMER 2011 (Oral Report) Michelle Perera, Assistant Library Director, and Renee Tobin, Principal Librarian, presented the staff report. N17. HEALTHY RC UPDATE (Oral Report) Erika Lewis-Huntley, Management Analyst II, and Kristen Compean, Healthy RC Coordinator, presented the staff report. O. COUNCIL BUSINESS 01. COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS (Comments to be Ilmlted to three minutes per Councilmember.) No announcements were made. P. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING No items were ident~ed. Q. ADJOURNMENT Mayor Michael adjourned the meeting at 10:46 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Debra L. McKay, MMC Assistant City Clerk/Records Manager Approved: "'*' Redevelopment Agency, Fire Protection District, City Council Minutes July 20, 2011 -Page 11 of 11 RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Agenda Check Register 7/13/2011 through 7/26/2011 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00312224 7/13/2011 FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INS CO 57.00 AP - 00312242 7/13/2011 HILL AND KNOWLTON INC 8,893.40 AP - 00312252 7/13/2011 INTEGRITY DOOR & HARDWARE INC 106.58 AP - 00312253 7/13/2011 INTERNATIONAL LINE BUILDERS INC 11,621.02 AP - 003123SS 7/13/2011 VEND U COMPANY 159.22 AP - 00312420 7/13/2011 HUNT CALENDARS LLC 49.95 AP - 00312421 7/13/2011 INFOGROUP 11,600.00 AP - 00312499 7/20/2011 ADAPT CONSULTING INC 3,695.63 AP - 00312529 7/20/2011 CQ PRODUCTIONS 1,000.00 AP = 00312529 7/20/2011 CQ PRODUCTIONS 1,000.00 AP - 00312535 7/20/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 14,412.38 AP - 00312541 7/20/2011 ELITE MOBILE RV SERVICES 10,462.50 AP - 00312548 7/20/2011 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 19.47 AP - 003 ] 2548 7/20/2011 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 19.47 AP - 00312553 7/20/2011 GEOGRAPHICS 274.59 AP - 00312576 7/20/2011 JACOBS ENGINEERING 23,270.18 AP - 00312582 7/20/2011 KME FIRE APPARATUS 6,033.98 AP - 00312582 7/20/2011 KME FIRE APPARATUS 6,601.45 AP - 00312582 7/20/2011 KME FIRE APPARATUS 6,242.25 AP - 00312582 7/20/201 I KME FIRE APPARATUS 3,639.96 AP - 00312600 7/20/2011 MORRIS, CATHY 72.00 AP - 00312602 7/20/2011 NATIONAL CONSTRUCTION RENTALS INC 170.19 AP - 003126]2 7/20/2011 OFFICE DEPOT 305.96 AP - 00312645 7/20/2011 SOCIAL VOCATIONAL SERVICES 750.00 AP - 00312658 7/20/2011 THIRD ALARM FIRE EQUIPMENT COMPANY 7,068.75 AP - 00312673 7/20/2011 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 2,S27.SS AP - 00312677 7/20/2011 WEST END MATERIAL SUPPLY 2,447.44 AP - 00312677 7/20/2011 WEST END MATERIAL SUPPLY 3,286.24 AP - 00312706 7/20/2011 COSTAR REALTY INFORMATION INC 1,181.00 AP - 00312717 7/20/201 I EMBASSY SUITES HOTEL -SAN DIEGO BAY 76S.S0 AP - 00312724 7/20/2011 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORD 19.47 AP - 00312724 7/20/201 I FEDERAL EXPRESS CORD 19.47 AP - 00312752 7/20/2011 KIPLINGER LETTER, THE 99.00 AP - 00312781 7/20/2011 PRECISION CRANE 1,011.80 AP - 00312799 7/20/2011 TUTOR.COM INC 17,500.00 AP - 00312829 7/21/2011 KONICA MINOLTA BUSINESS SOLUTIONS USA 19.60 AP - 00312835 7/21/2011 GENERATOR SERVICES CO 1,724.00 Total (or Check ID AP: 148,127.00 Total for Entity: 148,127.00 P1 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 1 Current Date: 07/27/201 Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 09:32:5 P2 STAFF REPORT 1 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPdRTYIENT RANCHO Date: August 3, 2011 C,UCAMONGA To: Chairman and Members of the Redevelopment Agency Jack Lam, AICP, Executive Director From: Mark A. Steuer, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer By: Walter C. Stickney, Associate Engineef~ Subject: APPROVAL OF COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF FONTANA AND THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FOR REIMBURSEMENT OF COSTS FOR CERTAIN IMPROVEMENTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE EAST AVENUE MASTER PLAN STORM DRAIN LINE 8 PROJECT AND AUTHORIZE THE CHAIRMAN TO SIGN SAID COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Redevelopment Agency approve the Cooperative Agreement between the City of Fontana and the City of Rancho Cucamonga for the East Avenue Master Plan Storm Drain Line 8 Project and authorize the Chairman and City Clerk to sign two (2) originals of said Cooperative Agreement. BACKGROUNDIANALYSIS As you recall, in June, the Redevelopment Agency Board awarded a contract for the construction of a Master Plan Storm Drain line in East Avenue from Foothill Boulevard to north of Base Line Road. Because the centerline of East Avenue serves as the boundary between the City of Fontana and the City of Rancho Cucamonga, City engineering staff met with engineering staff from the City of Fontana to discuss the affects that the storm drain installation may have on the City of Fontana. During one of these meetings, Fontana staff requested that a badly damaged portion of A.C. pavement on the Fontana side of East Avenue just north of Foothill Boulevard be removed and replaced as part of the East Avenue Master Plan Storm Drain Line 8 Project: An on-site meeting determined that a 210 feet long by 32 feet wide section of pavement in the City of Fontana would be removed and replaced, at Fontana's cost. This work was added to the project plans. The Cooperative Agreement formalizes the terms/responsibilities for the pavement removal and installation work. The City of Rancho Cucamonga's contractor will perform the work. The City of Fontana will reimburse the City of Rancho Cucamonga for the cost of the work. The estimated cost of the pavement removal and installation is $34,100.00. Resp submitted, ...~~?~ Mark A. Steuer Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer MASNVCS:Is Attachmenfi ('T~'v (1 Ti' 'L7 A AT["~Vn !^ITT~ . ~ ~`.~r.. . CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA VICINITY M.AP ~~ -,,.. _:--'~', EAST AVENUE MASTER PLAN - STORM DRAIN L1NE 8 PROJECT P3 RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Re¢ister 7/13/2011 through 7/26/2011 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00312160 7/13/2011 ADAPT CONSULTING INC 451.53 AP - 00312164 7/13/2011 AGILINE INC 520.00 AP - 00312169 7/13/2011 AMBU INC. 3,860.87 AP - 00312190 7/13/2011 CARNES, SANDY 43.82 AP - 00312190 7/13/2011 CARNES, SANDY 145.68 AP - 00312194 7/13/20] 1 CHANNING BETE COMPANY INC 1,452.97 AP - 00312194 7/13/2011 CHANNING BETE COMPANY INC 1,172.87 AP - 00312208 7/]3/2011 DEPARTMENT OF FORESTRY AND FIRE PROTE 588.63 AP - 00312221 7/13/2011 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 19.47 AP - 00312225 7/13/2011 FLEET SERVICES INC. 127.43 AP -00312239 7/13/2011 HAZARD CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES 5,000.00 AP - 00312267 7/13/2011 LIEBERT CASSIDY WHITMORE 2,475.00 AP - 00312272 7/13/2011 LOWES COMPANIES INC. -75.00 AP - 00312272 7/13/201 I LOWES COMPANIES INC. 1,065.55 AP - 00312272 7/13/2011 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 75.02 AP - 00312272 7/13/2011 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 16.23 AP - 00312272 7/13/2011 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 95.96 AP - 00312272 7/13/2011 LOWES COMPANIES INC: 5.29 AP - 00312272 7/13/2011 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 4.13 AP - 00312272 7/13/2011 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 229.33 AP - 00312272 7/13/2011 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 11.66 AP - 00312280 7/13/2011 MEDINA, BREANNA 55.19 AP - 00312295 7/13/2011 NATIONAL CONSTRUCTION RENTALS INC 12.60 AP - 00312306 7/13/2011 PATTON SALES CORP 16.31 AP - 00312333 7/13/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 1,120.41 AP - 00312333 7/13/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 364.92 AP - 00312373 7/13/2011 AFSS 150.00 AP - 00312492 7/14/2011 INTERSTATE BATTERIES 235.60 AP - 00312492 7/14/2011 INTERSTATE BATTERIES 235.60 AP - 00312492 7/14/2011 INTERSTATE BATTERIES 235.60 AP - 00312492 7/14/2011 INTERSTATE BATTERIES 235.63 AP - 00312503 7/20/2011 ALLSTAR FIRE EQUIPMENT INC 168.22 AP - 00312517 7/20/2011 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC. 56.73 AP - 00312517 7/20/2011 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC. 103.08 AP - 00312523 7/20/2011 CFCA EMS 985.00 AP - 00312524 7/20/2011 CHINO MOWER AND ENGINE SERVICE 10.50 AP - 00312527 7/20/2011 - CONSUMERS PIPE-FONTANA 45.57 AP - 00312534 7/20/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 179.75 AP - 00312534 7/20/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 147.67 AP - 00312539 7/20/2011 DIAMONDBACK FIRE & RESCUE 2,216.51 AP - 00312557 7/20/2011 GRAYBAR -279.10 AP - 00312557 7/20/2011 GRAYBAR 51.75 AP - 00312557 7/20/2011 GRAYBAR 227.05 AP - 00312557 7/20/2011 GRAYBAR 287.09 AP - 00312565 7/20/2011 HSBC BUSINESS SOLUTIONS 42.40 AP - 00312582 7/20/2011 KME FIRE APPARATUS -6,033.98 AP - 00312582 7/20/2011 KME FIRE APPARATUS 518.57 AP - 00312582 7/20/2011 KME FIRE APPARATUS 1,267.50 AP - 003 ] 2582 7/20/2011 KME FIRE APPARATUS 49.05 AP - 00312582 7/20/2011 KME FIRE APPARATUS 56.48 AP - 00312582 7/20/2011 KME FIRE APPARATUS -6,601.45 AP - 00312582 7/20/2011 KME FIRE APPARATUS -6,242.25 AP - 00312582 7/20/2011 KME FIRE APPARATUS -3,639.96 AP - 00312587 7/20/2011 LIFE ASSIST INC 514.59 P4 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 1 Current Date: 07/27/201 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 09:33:3 RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Register 7/13/2011 through 7/26/2011 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amouut AP - 00312587 7/20/2011 LIFE ASSIST INC 258.50 AP - 00312587 7/20/2011 LIFE ASSIST INC 788.66 AP - 00312587 7/20/2011 LIFE ASSIST INC 1,049.97 AP - 00312592 7/20/201 I MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 835.10 AP - 00312592 7/20/2011 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 940.81 AP - 00312604 7/20/2011 NEXTEL 39.99 AP - 00312604 7/20/2011 NEXTEL 37.61 AP - 00312607 7/20/2011 NUSTAGROUP.COM 154.88 AP - 00312609 7/20/2011 OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH CENTERS OF CALIFO 12.00 AP - 00312612 7/20/2011 OFFICE DEPOT 247.46 AP - 00312612 7/20/2011 OFFICE DEPOT 11.70 AP - 00312612 7/20/201 I OFFICE DEPOT -71.98 AP - 00312612 7/20/201 ] OFFICE DEPOT 300.85 AP - 00312612 7/20/2011 OFFICE DEPOT -194.23 AP - 00312612 7/20/2011 OFFICE DEPOT 12.70 AP - 00312612 7/20/2011 OFFICE DEPOT 77.83 AP - 00312632 7/20/2011 RESCUE RESPONSE GEAR LLC 977.19 AP - 00312637 7/20/2011 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY FPOS 65.00 AP - 00312637 7/20/2011 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY FPOS 65.00 AP - 00312637 7/20/201 I SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY FPOS 65.00 AP - 00312637 7/20/2011 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY FPOS 65.00 AP - 00312655 7/20/201 I TERMINIX PROCESSING CENTER 65.00 AP - 00312655 7/20/2011 TERMINIX PROCESSING CENTER 71.00 AP - 00312655 7/20/2011 TERMINIX PROCESSING CENTER 81.00 AP - 00312660 7/20/2011 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 54.82 AP - 00312687 7/20/2011 AIR & HOSE SOURCE INC. 109.47 AP - 00312688 7/20/2011 ALL CITIES TOOLS 89.20 AP - 00312699 7/20/2011 BW PRINTWORKS 455.41 AP - 00312701 7/20/2011 CARQUEST AUTO PARTS 92.97 AP - 00312701 7/20/2011 CARQUEST AUTO PARTS 22.89 AP - 00312705 7/20/2011 CONFIRE JPA 22,683.37 AP - 00312705 7/20/2011 CONFIRE ]PA 18,]46.69 AP - 00312705 7/20/201 I CONFIRE JPA 4,536.67 AP - 00312720 7/20/2011 ESTRELLA, JESSICA 20.00 AP - 00312722 7/20/201 I FAIRA 39,409.20 AP - 00312722 7/20/2011 FAIRA 9,852.30 AP - 00312722 7/20/2011 FAIRA 39,409.20 AP - 00312722 7/20/2011 FAIRA 9,852.30. AP - 00312739 7/20/20] 1 HOYT LUMBER CO., SM 134.87 AP - 00312742 7/20/2011 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 221.00 AP - 00312761 7/20/2011 MIJAC ALARM COMPANY 204.00 AP - 00312761 7/20/2011 MIJAC ALARM COMPANY 348.00 AP - 00312761 7/20/2011 MIJAC ALARM COMPANY 348.00 AP - 00312761 7/20/2011 MIJAC ALARM COMPANY 342.00 AP - 00312761 7/20/2011 MIJAC ALARM COMPANY 348.00 AP - 00312761 7/20/2011 MIJAC ALARM COMPANY 348.00 AP - 00312761 7/20/2011 MIJAC ALARM COMPANY 348.00 AP - 00312774 7/20/2011 OWEN ELECTRIC INC 98.28 AP - 00312778 7/20/2011 PIT STOP EMBROIDERY AND SCREEN PRINT 1,000.00 AP - 00312778 7/20/2011 PIT STOP EMBROIDERY AND SCREEN PRINT 142.30 AP - 00312789 7/20/2011 ROSE, LORRAINE 20.00 AP - 00312792 7/20/2011 SOCAL FPO 55.00 AP - 00312792 7/20/2011 SOCAL FPO 55.00 AP - 00312797 7/20/2011 TERMINIX PROCESSING CENTER 4875 PS User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 2 Current Date: 07/27/201 Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 09:33:3 RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Register 7/13/2011 through 7/26/2011 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00312800 7/20/2011 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 54.92 AP - 00312814 7/20/2011 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 110.68 AP - 00312814 7/20/201 I VERIZON CALIFORNIA 473.06 AP - 00312814 7/20/2011 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 549.25 AP - 00312814 7/20/2011 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 36.89 AP - 00312814 7/20/2011 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 110.68 AP - 00312814 7/20/2011 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 38.07 AP - 00312814 7/20/2011 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 18.54 AP - 00312814 7/20/2011 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 36.90 AP - 00312814 7/20/2011 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 1 ]3.07 AP - 00312817 7/20/2011 WEST END UNIFORMS 111.24 AP - 00312818 7/20/2011 WESTPAC HEAVY DUTY OF CALIFORNIA LLC 75.68 AP - 00312818 7/20/201 I WESTPAC HEAVY DUTY OF CALIFORNIA LLC 73.25 AP - 00312818 7/20/201 I WESTPAC HEAVY DUTY OF CALIFORNIA LLC 12.74 AP - 00312818 7/20/2011 WESTPAC HEAVY DUTY OF CALIFORNIA LLC -29.16 AP - 00312818 7/20/2011 WESTPAC HEAVY DUTY OF CALIFORNIA LLC 29.16 AP - 00312821 7/21/2011 AIRGAS WEST 17.05 AP - 00312821 7/21/2011 AIRGAS WEST 21.87 AP - 00312821 7/21/2011 AIRGAS WEST 26.51 AP - 00312821 7/21/2011 AIRGAS WEST 19.55 AP - 00312821 7/21/2011 AIRGAS WEST 50.29 AP - 00312821 7/21/2011 AIRGAS WEST 138.16 AP - 00312821 7/21/2011 AIRGAS WEST 84.96 AP - 003 ] 2828 7/21/2011 INTERSTATE BATTERIES 180.42 AP - 00312828 7/21/2011 INTERSTATE BATTERIES -30.13 AP - 00312829 7/21/2011 KOMCA MINOLTA BUSINESS SOLUTIONS USA 90.11 AP - 00312830 7/21/2011 LN CURTIS AND SONS 28.38 AP - 00312834 7/21/2011 DAPPER TIRE CO 167.67 AP - 00312834 7/21/2011 DAPPER TIRE CO 330.42 AP - 00312837 7/21/2011 LN CURTIS AND SONS 267.33 AP - 00312838 7/26/2011 KILMER, STEPHEN 1,020.40 AP - 00312839 7/26/2011 WALKER, KENNETH 325.66 Total for Check ID AP: 163,384.42 EP - 00001911 7/26/2011 AHUMADA, ALEXANDER R 1,530.36 EP - 00001912 7/26/2011 ALMAND, LLOYD 759.32 EP - 00001913 7/26/2011 ARTHUR, VERA A. 174.30 EP - 000019]4 7/26/2011 BANTAU, VICTORIA 423.90 EP - 00001915 7/26/2011 BAZAL, SUSAN 1,192.50 EP - 00001916 7/26/2011 BERRY, DAVID 760.00 EP - 00001917 7/26/2011 BILLINGS, ESTER 229.88 EP - 00001918 7/26/2011 CARNES, KENNETH 608.30 EP - 00001919 7/26/2011 CLABBY, RICHARD 760.00 EP - 00001920 7/26/2011 CORCORAN, ROBERT 1,466.48 EP - 00001921 7/26/2011 COX, FAYE 174.30 EP - 00001922 7/26/2011 COX, KARL 759.32 EP - 00001923 7/26/2011 CRANE, RALPH 1,913.36 EP - 00001924 7/26/2011 CROSSLAND, WILBUR 456.60 EP - 00001925 7/26/2011 DAGUE, JAMES 1,466.48 EP - 00001926 7/26/2011 DE ANTONIO, SUSAN 679.24 EP - 00001927 7/26/2011 DOMEVICK, SAMUEL A. ],466.48 EP - 00001928 7/26/2011 EAGLESON, MICHAEL 1,938.82 EP - 00001929 7/26/2011 FRITCHEY, JOHN D. 760.00 EP - 00001930 7/26/2011 HEYDE, DONALD 1,466.48 P6 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 3 Current Date: 07/27/201 Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 09:33:3 RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Resister 7/13/2011 through 7/26/20] ] Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount EP - 00001931 7/26/2011 INTERLICCHIA, ROSALYN 627.97 EP - 00001932 7/26/2011 LANE, WILLIAM 1,938.82 EP - 00001933 7/26/2011 LEE, ALLAN 1,368.46 EP - 00001934 7/26/2011 LENZE, PAUL E 1,184.02 EP - 00001935 7/26/2011 LONGO, JOE 174.30 EP - 00001936 7/26/2011 LUTTRULL, DARRELL 608.30 EP - 00001937 7/26/2011 MACKALL, BENJAMIN 174.30 EP - 00001938 7/26/2011 MAYFIELD, RON 2,519.77 EP - 00001939 7/26/2011 MCKEE, JOHN 1,942.75 EP - 00001940 7/26/2011 MCMILLEN, LINDA 450.73 EP - 00001941 7/26/2011 MCNEIL, KENNETH 1,913.36 EP - 00001942 7/26/2011 MICHAEL, L. DENNIS 1,466.48 EP - 00001943 7/26/2011 MORGAN, BYRON 1,933.73 EP - 00001944 7/26/2011 MYSKOW, DENNIS 760.00 EP - 00001945 7/26/2011 NAUMAN, MICHAEL 760.00 EP - 00001946 7/26/2011 NEE, RON 2,519.77 EP - 00001947 7/26/2011 NELSON, MARY ]ANE 174.30 EP - 00001948 7/26/2011 PLOUNG, MICHAEL J 760.00 EP - 00001949 7/26/2011 POST, MICHAEL R 1,548.12 EP - 00001950 7/26/2011 SALISBURY, THOMAS 760.00 EP - 00001951 7/26/2011 SMITH, RONALD 760.00 EP - 00001952 7/26/201 I SPAGNOLO, SAM 456.60 EP - 00001953 7/26/2011 SPAIN, WILLIAM 608.30 EP - 00001954 7/26/2011 SULLIVAN, JAMES 847.90 EP - 00001955 7/26/2011 TAYLOR, STEVE 1,184.02 EP - 00001956 7/26/2011 TULEY, TERRY 1,466.48 EP - 00001957 7/26/2011 VANDERICALLEN, FRANCIS 1,466.48 EP - 00001958 7/26/2011 WOLFE, DUANE 1,913.36 EP - 00001959 7/26/20] 1 YOWELL, TIMOTHY A 2,519.77 Total for Check ID EP: 53,794.21 Total for Entity: 217,178.63 P7 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 4 Current Date: 07/27/201 Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layou[ Time: 09:33:3 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 7/13/2011 through 7/26/2011 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00312153 7/13/2011 A AND B BUS COMPANY 2,787.50 AP - 00312154 7/13/2011 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 5,182.80 AP - 00312155 7/13/201 I A&V SOFTBALL 2,925.00 AP - 00312156 7/13/2011 A'JONTUE, ROSE ANN 903.60 AP - 00312157 7/13/2011 Al AUTOMOTIVE 1,206.44 AP - 00312158 7/13/2011 AA EQUIPMENT RENTALS CO INC 1,173.71 AP - 00312158 7/13/201 I AA EQUIPMENT RENTALS CO INC 719.40 AP - 00312158 7/13/201 I AA EQUIPMENT RENTALS CO INC 106.38 AP - 00312158 7/13/2011 AA EQUIPMENT RENTALS CO INC 657.46 AP - 00312158 7/13/2011 AA EQUIPMENT RENTALS CO INC 719.40 AP - 00312159 7/13/2011 ACADEMY OF MUSIC 2,003.40 AP - 00312161 7/13/2011 ADS PRODUCTIONS 81.56 AP - 00312162 7/13/2011 AEI-CASC ENGINEERING INC. 17,832.76 AP - 00312162 7/13/2011 AEI-CASC ENGINEERING INC. 262.50 AP - 00312162 7/13/2011 AEI-CASC ENGINEERING INC. 11,676.53 AP - 00312163 7/13/2011 AGAPE EMPLOYMENT 682.00 AP - 00312163 7/13/201 I AGAPE EMPLOYMENT 294.17 AP - 00312163 7/13/2011 AGAPE EMPLOYMENT 613.80 AP - 00312164 7/13/201 I AGILINE INC 1,380.00 AP - 00312164 7/13/201 I AGILINE INC 140.00 AP - 00312165 7/13/2011 ALFONSO, ASHLING 333.00 AP - 00312166 7/13/2011 ALL CITIES TOOLS 2,338.13 AP - 00312167 7/13/2011 ALMADINA PIZZA 300.17 AP - 00312168 7/13/2011 ALPHAGRAPHICS 519.78 AP - 00312170 7/13/2011. AMERINATIONAL COMMUNITY SERVICES INC. 280.00 AP - 00312171 7/] 3/2011 AMTECH ELEVATOR SERVICES 250.37 AP - 00312172 7/13/2011 ANTECH DIAGNOSTICS 566.25 AP - 00312172 7/13/2011 ANTECH DIAGNOSTICS 24.44 AP - 00312173 7/13/2011 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES 3.35 AP - 00312174 7/13/2011 ARROW RESTAURANT EQUIPMENT 3,795.94 AP - 00312175 7/13/2011 ASAP POWERSPORTS 57.00 AP - 00312176 7/13/2011 AUDAZ RANCHO INVESTMENT 184.14 AP - 00312177 7/13/201 I AUTO RESTORATORS INC 2,261.89 AP - 00312178 7/13/2011 BALDY FIRE AND SAFETY 194.11 AP - 00312179 7/13/2011 BARNES AND NOBLE 966.97 AP - 00312179 7/13/2011 BARNES AND NOBLE 353.78 AP - 00312179 7/13/2011 BARNES AND NOBLE 1,491.20 AP - 00312179 7/13/201 I BARNES AND NOBLE 728.77 AP - 00312179 7/13/2011 BARNES AND NOBLE 330.00 AP - 00312179 7/13/2011 BARNES AA'D NOBLE 642.91 AP - 00312179 7/13/2011 BARNES AND NOBLE 26.92 AP - 00312179 7/13/201 I BARNES AND NOBLE 1,523.15 AP - 00312179 7/13/2011 BARNES AND NOBLE 1,523.14 AP - 00312180 7/13/201 I BEN BOLLINGER PRODUCTIONS INC. 4,000.00 AP - 00312181 7/13/2011 BERTINO AUTOMOTIVE SERVICE 391.51 AP - 00312182 7/13/2011 BEST BEST AND KRIEGER 112.50 AP - 003]2182 7/13/2011 BEST BEST AND KRIEGER 1,616.50 AP - 00312183 7/13/2011 BLISS, REBECCA 30.00 AP - 00312184 7/13/2011 BRAMBILA, RUBEN 5,833.33 AP - 00312185 7/13/2011 BRUNSWICK DEER CREEK LANES 288.75 AP - 00312185 7/13/20] I BRUNSWICK DEER CREEK LANES 119.70 AP - 00312186 7/13/20] 1 BUSINESS SKATEDOGS 630.00 AP - 00312187 7/13/2011 BUTLER SCHEIN ANIMAL HEALTH SUPPLY 76.11 AP - 00312188 7/13/2011 CALIFORNIA BUILDING STANDARDS COMMIS'. 1,568.70 PS User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez .Page: 1 ='~ Current Date: 07/27/201 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 09:25:2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P9 Agenda Check Register 7/13/2011 through 7/26/2011 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name - Amount AP - 00312189 7/13/2011 CALIFORNIA, STATE OF 472.87 AP - 00312190 7/13/2011 CARNES, SANDY 395.00 AP - 00312191 7/13/2011 CARTY, DIANE 973.80 AP - 00312192 7/13/2011 CASTILLO, FRANK 105.00 AP - 00312192 7/13/2011 CASTILLO, FRANK 553.50 AP - 00312193 7/13/2011 CERTIFION CORPORATION DBA/ENTERSECT 8.95 AP - 00312195 7/13/2011 CLARK, KAREN 1,134.00 AP - 00312196 7/13/201 I CLIMATEC BUILDING TECHNOLOGIES GROUP 633.33 AP - 00312197 7/13/2011 COAST RECREATION INC 126.26 AP - 00312197 7/13/2011 COAST RECREATION INC 148.53 AP - 00312197 7/13/2011 COAST RECREATION INC 4.69 AP - 00312197 7/13/2011 COAST RECREATION INC 13.15 AP - 00312197 7/13/2011 COAST RECREATION INC 58.18 AP - 00312198 7/13/2011 COMBINED MARTIAL SCIENCE INC 3,522.90 AP - 00312199 7/13/2011 CONCEPT POWDER COATING 100.00 AP - 00312199 7/13/2011 CONCEPT POWDER COATING 1,043.00 AP - 00312200 7/13/2011 COP TOWN UNIFORMS INC. 146.76 AP - 00312200 7/13/2011 COP TOWN UNIFORMS INC. 492.42 AP - 00312200 7/13/2011 COP TOWN UNIFORMS INC. 146.32 AP - 00312201 7/13/2011 CORONA CLAY COMPANY INC 1,303.28 AP - 00312202 7/13/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 6,005.16 AP - 003]2203 7/13/2011 CYBERTECH SYSTEMS & SOFTWARE INC. 3,000.00 AP - 00312204 7/13/2011 DAGHDEVIRIAN, KATHY 630.00 AP - 00312205 7/13/2011 DANCE DYNAMICS 9,130.00 AP - 00312206 7/13/201 I DANCE TERRIFIC 277.80 AP - 00312206 7/13/2011 DANCE TERRIFIC 1,678.10 AP - 00312207 7/13/2011 DAVID TAUSSIG AND ASSOCIATES INC. 774.23 AP - 00312207 7/13/2011 DAVID TAUSSIG AND ASSOCIATES INC. 476.00 AP - 00312207 7/13/2011 DAVID TAUSSIG AND ASSOCIATES INC. 100.00 AP - 00312209 7/13/2011 DORNING INC, GLENN B 279.76 AP - 00312210 7/13/2011 DRACHAND, DI ANNE 540.00 AP - 00312211 7/13/2011 DUFFY, RICK 3,320.20 AP - 00312212 7/13/2011 DUNN EDWARDS CORPORATION 382.93 AP - 003122]3 7/13/2011 DUNN, ANNE MARIE 2,408.40 AP - 00312213 7/13/2011 DUNK, ANNE MARIE 352.80 AP - 00312214 7/13/2011 DURKEL, CAROL 42.84 AP - 00312215 7/13/2011 EIGHTH AVENUE ENTERPRISE LLC 266.44 AP - 00312216 7/13/2011 ELIE FARAH INC. 9,600.00 AP - 00312217 7/13/2011 ELLIS ENTERPRISES 70.00 AP - 00312217 7/13/2011 ELLIS ENTERPRISES 150.00 AP - 00312217 7/13/2011 ELLIS ENTERPRISES 170.00 AP - 00312217 7/13/2011 ELLIS ENTERPRISES 300.00 AP - 003]2217 7/13/2011 ELLIS ENTERPRISES 150.00 AP - 00312217 7/13/2011 ELLIS ENTERPRISES ~ 70.00 AP - 00312218 7/13/2011 EMPIRE NISSAN 37,259.31 AP - 00312219 7/13/201 I ENGRAVEN EMBROIDER THINGS 603.78 AP - 00312219 7/13/2011 ENGRAVEN EMBROIDER THINGS 42.40 AP - 00312220 7/13/2011 FASTENAL COMPANY 293.15 AP - 00312222 7/13/2011 FELICIANO, ANTHONY 798.00 AP - 00312223 7/13/2011 FENCE CRAFT OF UPLAND INC 548.27 AP - 00312226 7/13/2011 FLICKINGER, GLORIA 132.00 AP - 00312227 7/13/2011 FORD OF UPLAND INC 180.09 AP - 00312227 7/13/2011 FORD OF UPLAND INC 60.03 AP - 00312227 7/13/2011 FORD OF UPLAND INC 264.03 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 2 Current Date: 07/27/201 Report:CK_AGENDA_R EG_PORTRAI T RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 09:25:2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P10 Agenda Check Resister 7/13/2011 through 7/26/2011 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00312227 7/13/2011 FORD OF UPLAND INC 223.31 AP - 00312228 7/13/2011 G & J AIRCRAFT 47.36 AP - 00312229 7/13/2011 G AND M BUSINESS INTERIORS 68278 AP - 00312230 7/13/2011 GEARBOX FOOTWEAR INC. 219.41 AP - 00312231. 7/13/2011 GEIST, STEVE 43.16 AP - 00312232 7/13/2011 GEOGRAPHICS 1,319.14 AP - 00312233 7/13/2011 GIORDANO, MARIANNA 219.00 AP - 00312234 7/13/2011 GRAINGER 7823 AP - 00312234 7/13/2011 GRAINGER 269.93 AP - 00312234 7/13/2011 GRAINGER 67.39 AP - 00312234 7/13/2011 GRAINGER 26.68 AP - 00312234 7/13/2011 GRAINGER 722.82 AP - 00312234 7/13/201 I GRAINGER 57.50 AP - 00312234 7/13/2011 GRAINGER 111.09 AP - 00312234 7/13/201 I GRAINGER 21.14 AP - 00312234 7/13/2011 GRAINGER 403.04 AP - 00312234 7/13/2011 GRAINGER 1,972.17 AP - 00312234 7/13/2011 GRAINGER 9.04 AP - 00312234 7/13/2011 GRAINGER 33.74 AP - 00312235 7/13/2011 GRAPHICS FACTORY PRINTING INC. 462.19 AP - 00312236 7/13/2011 GREEN GENIE 200.00 AP - 00312237 7/13/2011 GYGER, DANA 100.00 AP - 00312238 7/13/2011 GYROSCOPE INC 22,000.00 AP - 00312240 7/13/2011 HEILIG, KELLY 1,128.60 AP - 00312241 7/13/2011 HI WAY SAFETY INC 435.00 AP - 00312241 7/13/2011 HI WAY SAFETY INC 1,460.19 AP - 00312243 7/13/2011 HILLS PET NUTRITION SALES INC 320.70 AP - 00312244 7/13/2011 HSU, STEVE 2,126.40 AP - 00312245 7/13/2011 HUTCHINSON, LISA 561.60 AP - 00312246 7/13/2011 ICE ARENA CENTER 154.00 AP - 00312247 7/13/2011 IDEAL GLASS TINTING 182.00 AP - 00312248 7/13/201 I INLAND EMPIRE TOURS AND TRANSPORTATIC 1,170.00 AP - 00312248 7/13/201 I INLAND EMPIRE TOURS AND TRANSPORTATIC 2,211.50 AP - 00312248 7/13/2011 INLAND EMPIRE TOURS AND TRANSPORTATIC 927.00 AP - 00312249 7/13/2011 INLAND PRESORT & MAILING SERVICES 50.07 AP - 00312250 7/13/2011 INLAND VALLEY DANCE ACADEMY 1,600.80 AP - 00312251 7/13/2011 INNERLINE ENGINEERING INC 1,001.25 AP - 00312254 7/13/2011 JAN WAY COMPANY INC 485.98 AP - 00312255 7/13/2011 JOHN DEERE LANDSCAPES 462.35 AP - 00312256 7/13/2011 JOHNSON, JENNY 78.00 AP - 00312257 7/13/2011 K HOVNANIAN COMPANIES 3,556.90 AP - 00312258 7/13/2011 K K WOODWORKING 34.76 AP - 00312259 7/13/2011 KAPLAN EARLY LEARNING COMPANY 373.35 AP - 00312259 7/13/2011 KAPLAN EARLY LEARNING COMPANY 373.34 AP - 00312260 7/13/201 I KARIMIAN, HASSAN 4,097.93 AP - 00312261 7/13/2011 KELLY EQUIPMENT 678.57 AP - 00312262 7/13/2011 KIDSART 922.60 AP - 00312263 7/13/2011 KIRKWOOD, MARGARET 23.00 AP - 00312264 7/13/2011 KNOTTS BERRY FARM 2,330.94 AP - 00312265 7/13/2011 KONETZNY, JENIFER 756.00 AP - 00312266 7/13/2011 LDC TRAINING 1,705.20 AP - 00312268 7/13/2011 LIM, HEATHER 429.00 AP - 00312269 7/13/2011 LITTLE BEAR PRODUCTIONS 285.00 AP - 00312269 7/13/2011 LITTLE BEAR PRODUCTIONS 150.00 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 3 Current Date: 07/27/201 Report:CK_AGENDA REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 09:25:2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Resister 7/13%2011 through 7/26/2011 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00312270 7/13/2011 LIVE OAK DOG OBEDIENCE 445.50 AP - 00312272 7/13/2011 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 16.95 AP - 00312272 7/13/2011 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 83.41 AP - 00312272 7/13/2011 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 50.11 AP - 00312272 7/13/2011 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 133.98 AP - 00312272 7/13/2011 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 102.81 AP - 00312272 7/13/2011 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 42.86 AP - 00312272 7/13/2011 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 37.13 AP - 00312272 7/13/2011 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 4.32 AP - 00312272 7/13/2011 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 79.42 AP - 00312272 7/13/2011 LOWES COMPANIES INC. ~ 187.89 AP - 00312272 7/13/2011 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 7.56 AP - 00312272 7/13/2011 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 10.19 AP - 00312272 7/13/2011 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 5.63 AP - 00312272 7/13/2011 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 4.22 AP - 00312272 7/13/2011 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 121.28 AP - 00312272 7/13/2011 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 41.80 AP - 00312272 7/13/2011 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 31.27 AP - 00312272 7/13/2011 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 368.66 AP - 00312272 7/13/2011 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 180.53 AP - 00312272 7/13/201 ] LOWES COMPANIES INC. 14.70 AP - 00312272 7/13/2011 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 80.32 AP - 00312272 7/13/2011 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 77.08 AP - 00312272 7/13/2011 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 294.23 AP - 00312272 7/13/2011 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 15.63 AP - 00312272 7/13/2011 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 293. ] 7 AP - 003]2272 7/13/2011 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 8.62 AP - 003 ] 2272 7/13/2011 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 60.40 AP - 00312272 7/13/2011 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 56.32 AP - 00312272 7/13/2011 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 18.43 AP - 00312272 7/13/2011 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 360.44 AP - 00312272 7/13/201 I LOWES COMPANIES INC. 164.70 AP - 00312272 7/13/2011 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 109.23 AP - 00312272 7/13/2011 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 9.20 AP - 00312272 7/13/201 ] LOWES COMPANIES INC. 17.89 AP - 00312272 7/13/2011 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 54.69 AP - 00312272 7/13/201 I LOWES COMPANIES INC. 92.07 AP - 00312272 7/13/2011 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 46.14 AP - 00312272 7/13/2011 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 9.20 AP - 00312272 7/13/2011 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 5.93 AP - 00312272 7/13/2011 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 2.76 AP - 00312272 7/13/2011 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 12.69 AP - 00312272 7/13/2011 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 301.24 AP - 00312272 7/13/2011 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 86.97 AP - 00312272 7/13/2011 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 51.30 AP - 00312272 7/13/2011 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 83.19 AP - 00312272 7/]3/2011 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 40.00 AP - 00312272 7/13/2011 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 48.65 AP - 00312272 7/13/2011 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 623.99 AP - 00312272 7/13/201 t LOWES COMPANIES INC. 70.40 AP - 00312272 7/13/2011 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 112.30 AP - 00312272 7/13/2011 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 161.89 AP - 00312273 7/13/2011 MAD SCIENCE 1,701.00 AP - 00312274 7/13/2011 MARSHALL PLUMBING 342.00 P11 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 4 Current Date: 07/27/201 Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 09:25:2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check ReEister 7/]3/2011 through?/26/2011 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name AP - 00312274 7/13/2011 MARSHALL PLUMBING AP - 00312274 7/13/2011 MARSHALL PLUMBING AP - 00312274 7/13/2011 MARSHALL PLUMBING AP - 00312274 7/13/2011 MARSHALL PLUMBING AP - 00312274 7/13/2011 MARSHALL PLUMBING AP - 00312274 7/13/2011 MARSHALL PLUMBING AP - 00312274 7/13/2011 MARSHALL PLUMBING AP - 00312274 7/13/2011 MARSHALL PLUMBING AP - 00312274 7/13/2011 MARSHALL PLUMBING AP - 00312275 7/13/2011 MARSHALL, SYLVIA AP - 00312276 7/13/2011 MARTINEZ UN[ON SERVICE AP - 00312276 7/13/2011 MARTINEZ UNION SERVICE AP - 00312276 7/13/2011 MARTINEZ UNION SERVICE AP - 00312276 7/13/2011 MARTINEZ UNION SERVICE AP - 00312276 7/13/2011 MARTINEZ UNION SERVICE AP - 00312277 7/13/2011 MATERIAL SALES UNLIMITED AP - 00312278 7/13/2011 MAUK, MELISSA AP - 00312279 7/13/2011 MCMASTER CARR SUPPLY COMPANY AP - 00312279 7/13/2011 MCMASTER CARR SUPPLY COMPANY AP - 00312279 7/13/2011 MCMASTER CARR SUPPLY COMPANY AP - 00312281 7/13/2011 MICRO BLADE INC AP - 00312282 7/13/20] 1 MIDWEST TAPE AP - 00312282 7/13/2011 MIDWEST TAPE AP - 00312282 7/13/2011 MIDWEST TAPE AP - 00312282 7/13/2011 MIDWEST TAPE AP - 00312282 7/13/2011 MIDWEST TAPE AP - 003 ]2282 7/13/2011 MIDWEST TAPE AP - 00312282 7/13/2011 MIDWEST TAPE AP - 00312283 7/13/2011 MILANES, YIKCIA AP - 00312284 7/13/2011 MINUTEMAN PRESS AP - 00312285 7/13/2011 MOBILE WALKIE TALKIE COMPANY, THE AP - 00312286 7/13/2011 MOE, JOHN AP - 00312287 7/13/2011 MORRIS, PAT AP - 00312288 7/13/2011 MOUNTAIN VIEW GLASS AND MIRROR INC AP - 00312289 7/13/2011 MOUNTAIN VIEW SMALL ENG REPAIR AP -00312289 7/13/2011 MOUNTAIN VIEW SMALL ENG REPAIR AP - 00312290 7/13/2011 MUNICIPAL CODE CORPORATION AP - 00312291 7/13/2011 MWI VETERINARY SUPPLY AP - 00312291 7/13/2011 MWI VETERINARY SUPPLY AP - 00312291 7/13/201 l MWI VETERINARY SUPPLY AP - 00312291 7/13/2011 MWI VETERINARY SUPPLY AP - 00312291 7/13/201 I MWI VETERINARY SUPPLY AP - 00312292 7/13/2011 MYERCHIN, NICOLE AP - 00312293 7/13/2011 N-2 FITNESS AP - 00312294 7/13/2011 NAPA AUTO PARTS AP - 00312294 7/13/2011 NAPA AUTO PARTS AP - 00312294 7/13/201 ] NAPA AUTO PARTS AP - 00312294 7/13/201 I NAPA AUTO PARTS AP - 00312294 7/13/2011 NAPA AUTO PARTS AP - 00312296 7/13/2011 NBS AP - 00312296 7/13/2011 NBS AP - 00312296 7/13/2011 NBS AP - 00312296 7/13/2011 NBS AP - 00312296 7/13/2011 NBS User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 5 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout P12 Amoun[ -160.25 -58.50 -85.25 -83.37 333.50 341.00 234.00 641.00 -85.50 1,437.60 45.00 45.00 45.00 150.00 45.00 958.67 6.00 39.37 439.18 1,242.50 30.49 13.59 294.86 117.94 79.13 229.95 111.90 158.91 100.00 584.37 618.56 747.90 6,120.00 64.16 34.54 62.65 1,384.40 59.70 928.78 97.88 2,005.99 29.23 973.20 330.00 85.90 701.15 23.42 -0.70 1,736.17 5,006.58 1,500.00 1,500.00 4,000.00 Current Date: 07/27/201 Time: 09:25:2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P13 Agenda Check ReEister 7/13/2011 through 7/26/2011 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name ~ Amount AP - 00312296 7/13/2011 NBS 2,749.85 AP - 00312296 7/13/2011 NBS 5,322.93 AP - 00312297 7/13/2011 ~ NICHOLS, GARY 682.50 AP - 00312298 7/13/2011 NINYO & MOORS 26,231.25 AP - 00312299 7/13/2011 NWOSU, LORETHA 20.40 AP - 00312300 7/13/2011 OFFICE DEPOT 52.74 AP - 00312300 7/13/2011 OFFICE DEPOT 219.15 AP - 00312300 7/13/2011 OFFICE DEPOT 65.89 AP - 00312300 7/13/2011 OFFICE DEPOT 377.99 AP - 00312300 7/13/20] 1 OFFICE DEPOT 112.48 AP - 00312300 7/13/2011 OFFICE DEPOT 19.54 AP - 00312300 7/13/201 I OFFICE DEPOT 678.02 AP - 00312300 7/13/2011 OFFICE DEPOT 44.99 AP - 00312300 7/13/2011 OFFICE DEPOT 20.24 AP - 00312300 7/13/2011 OFFICE DEPOT 33.61 AP - 00312300 7/13/2011 OFFICE DEPOT 132.60 AP - 00312300 7/13/2011 OFFICE DEPOT 745.20 AP - 00312300 7/13/2011 OFFICE DEPOT 54.36 AP - 00312300 7/13/2011 OFFICE DEPOT 74.97 AP - 00312300 7/13/2011 OFFICE DEPOT 1,008.58 AP - 00312300 7/13/2011 OFFICE DEPOT 565.21 AP - 00312300 7/13/2011 OFFICE DEPOT 153.67 AP - 00312300 7/13/2011 OFFICE DEPOT 49.54 AP - 00312300 7/13/2011 OFFICE DEPOT 2.98 AP - 00312300. 7/13/2011 OFFICE DEPOT 400.64 AP - 00312300 7/13/2011 OFFICE DEPOT 18.38 AP - 00312301 7/13/2011 ONTARIO ICE SKATING CENTER 302.40 AP - 00312302 7/13/2011 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 55.39 AP - 00312302 7/13/2011 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 26.46 AP - 00312302 7/13/201 I ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 70.19 AP - 00312302 7/13/2011 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 86.89 AP - 00312302 7/13/2011 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 76.11 AP - 00312302 7/13/2011 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 271.81 AP -.00312302 7/13/2011 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 230.43 AP - 00312302 7/13/2011 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 271.86 AP - 00312302 7/13/2011 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 17.39 AP - 00312302 7/13/2011 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 65.12 AP - 00312302 7/13/2011 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 509.78 AP - 00312302 7/13/2011 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 44.76 AP - 00312302 7/13/2011 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 7.54 AP - 00312302 7/13/2011 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 70.60 AP - 00312302 7/13/2011 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 78.42 AP - 00312302 7/13/2011 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 33.90 AP - 00312302 7/13/201 l ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE -45.54 AP - 00312302 7/13/2011 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE -66.26 AP - 00312302 7/13/2011 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE -124.26 AP - 00312302 7/13/2011 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 164.13 AP - 00312302 7/13/2011 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 90.31 AP - 00312302 7/13/2011 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 26.90 AP - 00312302 7/13/2011 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 17.18 AP - 00312302 7/13/2011 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 19.02 AP - 00312303 7/13/2011 ORR, PAUL 18.00 AP - 00312304 7/13/2011 PACIFIC TRUCK EQUIPMENT 5,013.34 AP - 00312304 7/13/2011 PACIFIC TRUCK EQUIPMENT 25.41 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 6 Current Dale: 07/27/201 Report:CK_AGENDA_R EG_PORTRAI T_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 09:25:2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA F14 Agenda Check Resister 7/13/2011 through 7/26/2011 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00312305 7/13/2011 PATHFINDER ORGANIZATIONAL EFFECTIVENI 3,700.00 AP - 00312307 7/13/201 ] PAVECO CONSTRUCTION INC 307.80 AP - 00312308 7/13/2011 PENNY PLUMBING 161.33 AP - 00312309 7/13/2011 PEP BOYS 1.99 AP - 00312309 7/13/2011 PEP BOYS 226.94 AP - 00312310 7/13/2011 PETES ROAD SERVICE INC 1,099.00 AP - 00312310 7/13/2011 PETES ROAD SERVICE INC 443.31 AP - 00312311 7/13/2011 PIONEER MANUFACTURING 583.92 AP - 00312312 7/13/2011 PIRTLE WELDING 225.00 AP - 00312313 7/13/2011 PRECISION GYMNASTICS r 3,594.70 AP - 00312314 7/13/2011 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 391.65 AP - 00312314 7/13/2011 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 162.11 AP - 00312314 7/13/2011 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 644.79 AP - 00312314 7/13/2011 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 268.58 AP - 00312314 7/13/2011 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 299.02 AP - 00312314 '7/13/2011 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 244.79 AP - 00312314 7/13/2011 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 68.65 AP - 00312314 7/13/2011 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 433.78 AP - 00312314 7/13/2011 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 339.70 AP - 00312314 7/13/2011 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 229.29 AP - 00312314 7/13/2011 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 297.08 AP - 00312314 7/13/2011 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 37.54 AP - 00312314 7/13/2011 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 155.93 AP - 00312314 7/13/2011 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 37.54 AP - 00312314 7/13/2011 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 317.10 AP - 00312314 7/13/2011 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 37.54 AP - 00312314 7/13/2011 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 37.54 AP - 00312314 7/13/2011 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 37.54 AP - 00312314 7/13/2011 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 37.54 AP - 00312314 7/13/2011 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 316.22 AP - 00312314 7/13/2011 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 229.48 AP - 00312314 7/13/2011 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 262.20 AP - 00312314 7/13/2011 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 384.26 AP - 00312314 7/13/2011 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 261.35 AP - 00312315 7/13/2011 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL I 50.00 AP - 00312315 7/13/2011 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL I 50.00 AP - 00312315 7/13/2011 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL I 50.00 AP - 00312315 7/13/2011 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL I 50.00 AP - 00312315 7/13/2011 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL I 25.00 AP - 00312315 7/13/2011 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL I 50.00 AP - 00312315 7/13/2011 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL I 50.00 AP - 00312315 7/13/2011 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL L 50.00 AP - 00312315 7/13/2011 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL L 50.00 AP - 00312315 7/13/2011 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL L 50.00 AP - 00312315 7/13/2011 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL I 50.00 AP - 00312316 7/13/2011 RAYBALLOONS 220.77 AP - 00312317 7/13/2011 REPUBLIC ITS 699.10 AP - 00312317 7/13/2011 REPUBLIC ITS 1,437.41 AP - 00312318 7/13/2011 . . RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 24,719.31 AP - 00312319 7/13/2011 RIDGELINE ROOFING 422.05 AP - 00312320 7/13/201 ] ROBLES, RAUL P 115.00 AP - 00312320 7/13/2011 ROBLES, RAUL P 65.00 AP - 003 ] 2320 7/13/2011 ROBLES, RAUL P 75.00 AP - 00312320 7/13/2011 ROBLES, RAUL P 75.00 User: VLOPEZ -Veron ica Lopez Page: 7 Current Date: 07/27/201 Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAI T_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 09:25:2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Pt 5 Agenda Check Register 7/13/2011 through 7/26/2011 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00312321 7/13/2011 SAFELITE FULFILLMENT INC 213.04 AP - 00312322 7/13/2011 SAFEWAY SIGN COMPANY 4,698.71 AP - 00312323 7/13/2011 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY AUDITOR CONTR( 274.50 AP - 00312323 7/13/2011 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY AUDITOR CONTR( 274.50 AP - 00312323 7/13/2011 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY AUDITOR CONTR( 366.00 AP - 00312323 7/13/201 ] SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY AUDITOR CONTR( 274.50 AP - 00312323 7/13/2011 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY AUDITOR CONTR( 890.00 AP - 00312323 7/13/2011 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY AUDITOR CONTRC 447.00 AP - 00312323 7/13/2011 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY AUDITOR CONTR( 546.00 AP - 00312324 7/13/201 I SAN BERNARDINO CTY OFFICE OF THE ASSES! 840.00 AP - 00312325 7/13/201'1 SAN BERNARDINO CTY OFFICE OF THE ASSES! 840.00 AP - 00312326 7/13/201 ] SCS SYSTEMS OF CALIFORNIA 50.79 AP - 00312327 7/13/2011 SHRED PROS 89.00 AP. - 00312327 7/13/2011 SHRED PROS 95.00 AP - 00312328 7/13/2011 SIGN SHOP, THE 4.35 AP - 00312329 7/13/2011 SIZZLER FAMILY STEAK HOUSE #567 101.25 AP - 00312330 7/13/2011 SOUTH COAST LIGHTING AND DESIGN 750.38 AP - 00312333 7/13/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 748.86 AP - 00312333 7/13/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 6,649.51 AP - 00312333 7/13/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.13 AP - 00312333 7/13/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.80 AP - 00312333 7/13/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 46.51 AP - 00312333 7/13/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.23 AP - 00312333 7/13/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.13 AP - 00312333 7/13/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.13 AP - 00312333 7/13/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.45 AP - 00312333 7/13/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 119.35 AP - 00312333 7/13/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 58.81 AP - 00312333 7/] 3/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.13 AP - 00312333 7/13/201 I SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.13 AP-003]2333 7/13/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIAEDISON 24.56 AP - 00312333 7/13/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.54 AP - 00312333 7/13/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 46.36 AP - 00312333 7/13/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 2223 AP - 00312333 7/13/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.23 AP - 00312333 7/13/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.13 AP - 00312333 7/13/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.13 AP - 00312333 7/13/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 49.94 AP - 00312333 7/13/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 46.26 AP - 00312333 7/13/20] 1 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 2.55 AP - 00312333 7/13/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 184.48 AP - 00312333 7/13/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 2223 AP - 00312333 7/13/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.45 AP - 00312333 7/13/201 I SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.26 AP - 00312333 7/13/201 I SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.45 AP - 00312333 7/13/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ED[SON 21.25 AP - 00312333 7/13/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.13 AP - 00312333 7/13/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 63.64 AP - 00312333 7/13/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 78.80 AP - 00312333 7/13/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 21.25 AP - 00312333 7/13/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.69 AP - 00312333 7/13/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.13 AP - 00312333 7/13/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.45 AP - 00312333 7/13/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.56 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 8 Current Date: 07/27/201 ReporCCK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAI T_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 09:25:2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 7/13/2011 through 7/26/2011 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00312333 7/13/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 2687 AP - 00312333 7/13/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 47.50 AP - 00312333 7/13/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.13 AP - 00312333 7/13/2011. SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.23 AP - 00312333 7/13/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.13 AP - 00312333 7/13/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 2223 AP - 00312333 7/13/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 55.14 AP - 00312333 7/13/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 49.48 AP - 00312333 7/13/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 64.98 AP - 00312333 7/13/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 145.32 AP - 00312333 7/13/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.13 AP - 00312333 7/13/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.13 AP - 00312333 7/13/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 21.93 AP - 00312333 7/13/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA'EDISON 24.45 AP - 00312333 7/13/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 160.14 AP - 00312333 7/13/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 2072 AP - 00312333 7/13/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 97.37 AP - 00312333 7/13/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.23 AP - 00312333 7/13/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.43 AP - 00312333 7/13/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.13 AP - 00312333 7/13/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.23 AP - 00312333 7/13/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 170.41 AP - 00312333 7/13/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 415.36 AP - 00312333 7/13/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 5.61 AP - 00312333 7/13/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 9.82 AP - 00312333 7/13/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.45 AP - 00312333 7/13/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 73.38 AP - 00312333 7/13/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 47.20 AP - 00312333 7/13/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 2223 AP - 00312333 7/13/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.31 AP - 00312333 ~ 7/] 3/201 I SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 396.49 AP - 00312333 7/13/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 21.20 AP - 00312333 7/13/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 2223 AP - 00312333 7/13/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.95 AP - 00312333 7/13/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 20,555.83 AP - 00312333 7/13/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.14 AP - 00312333 7/13/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 7,027.21 AP - 00312333 7/13/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 49.26 AP - 00312333 7/13/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 64.61 AP - 00312333 7/13/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 35.77 AP - 00312333 7/13/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.14 AP - 00312333 7/13/201 I SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 55.91 AP - 00312333 7/13/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 0.53 AP - 00312333 7/13/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 56.10 AP - 00312333 7/13/201 I SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 81.89 AP - 00312333 7/13/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 67.30 AP - 00312333 7/13/20] ] SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 2.82 AP - 00312333 7/13/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 34.91 AP - 00312333 7/13/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 55.96 AP - 00312333 7/13/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.11 AP - 00312333 7/] 3/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 72.07 AP - 00312333 7/13/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 46.45 AP - 00312333 7/13/2011 SOUTHERN CALffORNIA EDISON 77.68 AP.- 00312333 7/13/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 114.53 P16 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 9 Current Date: 07/27/201 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 09:25:2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 7/13/2011 through 7/26/2011 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00312333 7/13/201 I SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 20.52 AP - 00312333 7/13/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.09 AP - 00312333 7/13/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.13 AP - 00312333 7/13/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 58.44 AP - 00312333 7/13/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 21.25 AP - 00312333 7/] 3/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.13 AP - 00312333 7/13/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.13 AP - 00312333 7/13/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 89.90 AP - 00312333 7/13/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 20.52 AP - 00312333 7/13/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 66.06 AP - 00312333 7/13/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 98.26 AP - 00312333 7/13/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 33.63 AP - 00312333 7/13/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 46.26 AP - 00312334 7/13/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 31.80 AP - 00312334 7/13/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 91.48 AP - 00312334 7/13/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 30.19 AP - 00312334 7/13/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 376.47 AP - 00312334 7/13/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 205.81 AP - 00312334 7/13/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 267.46 AP - 00312335 7/13/2011 SOUTHWEST PLUMBING HEATING & AIR INC 67.56 AP - 00312336 7/13/2011 STAPLETON, JOSHUA 434.50 AP -00312337 7/13/2011 STEINY AND COMPANY INC 1,267.17 AP - 00312337 7/13/2011 STEINY AND COMPANY INC -4,101.10 AP - 00312337 7/13/2011 STEINY AND COMPANY INC 39,743.83 AP - 00312338 7/13/2011 STEVES TOWING AND TRANSPORT 76.00 AP - 00312339 7/13/20] 1 SUNGARD PUBLIC SECTOR INC 1,281.60 AP - 00312340 7/13/20 ] 1 TANG, LOI DUC -24.50 AP - 00312341 7/13/2011 TERRA VISTA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50.00 AP - 00312341 7/13/201 I TERRA VISTA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50.00 AP - 00312342 7/13/2011 TERRA VISTA MANAGEMENT 11.44 AP - 00312343 7/13/2011 TERRY, DONNA 350.35 AP - 00312344 7/13/2011 TOMARK SPORTS INC 705.82 AP - 00312345 7/13/2011 TOOMOTH, DR MICHELE PERSON 32.00 AP - 00312346 7/13/2011 TUTT, MANDISA 13.97 AP - 00312347 7/13/2011 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 238.07 AP - 00312347 7/13/2011 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 937.50 AP - 00312347 7/13/2011 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 25.85 AP - 00312347 7/13/2011 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 48.09 AP - 00312348 7/13/2011 UNITED SITE SERVICES OF CA INC 142.96 AP - 00312349 7/13/2011 UPLAND ANIMAL HOSPITAL 1,845.90 AP - 00312350 7/13/2011 UPLAND TENNIS CLUB 1,259.70 AP - 00312351 7/13/2011 UPSCO POWERSAFE SYSTEMS INC 300.00 AP - 00312352 7/13/2011 UPS 24.14 AP - 00312353 7/13/2011 VALVERDE SCHOOL OF PERFORMING ARTS 11,896.25 AP - 00312354 7/13/201 I VCA CENTRAL ANIMAL HOSPITAL 402.95 AP - 00312361 7/13/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 38.01 AP - 00312361 7/13/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 0.13 AP - 00312361 7/13/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 55.14 AP - 00312361 7/13/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 109.01 AP - 00312361 7/13/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 38.01 AP - 00312361 7/13/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 36.31 AP - 00312361 7/13/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 36.17 AP - 00312361 7/13/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 38.01 AP - 00312361 7/13/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 63.91 P77 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 10 Current Date: 07/27/201 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 09:25:2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P18 Agenda Check Register 7/13/2011 through 7/26/2011 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00312361 7/13/201 I VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 38.01 AP - 00312361 7/13/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 36.17 AP - 00312361 7/13/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 44.55 AP - 00312361 7/13/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 36.67 AP-00312361 7/13/2011 VERIZONWIRELESS-LA 36.]7 AP - 00312361 7/13/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 36.17 AP - 00312361 7/13/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 38.99 AP - 00312361 7/13/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 36.17 AP - 00312361 7/13/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 44.55 AP - 00312361 7/13/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 44.55 AP - 00312361 7/13/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 36.17 AP - 00312361 7/13/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 84.43 AP - 00312361 7/13/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 36.17 AP - 00312361 7/13/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 36.17 AP - 00312361 7/13/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 36.17 AP - 00312361 7/13/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 36.17 AP - 00312361 7/13/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 36.17 AP - 00312361 7/13/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 30.41 AP - 00312361 7/13/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 36.17 AP - 00312361 7/13/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 30.41 AP - 00312361 7/13/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 59.86 AP - 00312361 7/13/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 60.40 AP - 00312361 7/13/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 59.66 AP - 00312361 7/13/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 59.66 AP - 00312361 7/13/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 63.16 AP - 00312361 7/13/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 38.01 AP - 00312361 7/13/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 36.69 AP - 00312361 7/13/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 62.53 AP - 00312361 7/13/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 57.96 AP - 00312361 7/13/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 74.62 AP - 00312361 7/13/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS.- LA 95.24 AP - 00312361 7/13/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 69.80 AP - 00312361 7/13/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 63.15 AP - 00312361 7/13/201 ] VERIZON WIRELESS - LA ~ 62.87 AP - 00312361 7/13/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 37.16 AP - 00312361 7/13/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 37.16 AP - 00312361 7/13/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 36.17 AP - 00312361 7/13/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 71.80 AP - 00312361 7/13/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 36.17 AP - 00312361 7/13/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 288.47 AP - 00312361 7/13/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 59.70 AP - 00312361 7/13/201 I VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 37.83 AP - 00312361 7/13/201 I VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 38.16 AP - 00312361 7/13/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 38.01 AP - 00312361 7/13/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 53.33 AP - 00312361 7/13/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 39.16 AP - 00312361 7/13/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 39.41 AP - 00312361 7/13/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 38.13 AP - 00312361 7/13/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 67.66 AP - 00312361 7/13/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 79.65 AP - 00312361 7/13/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 36.37 AP - 00312361 7/13/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA .60.00 AP - 00312361 7/13/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 66.94 AP - 00312361 7/13/20] 1 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 36.17 User: VLOPEZ -Veron ica Lopez Page: 11 Current Date: 07/27/201 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAI T_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 09:25:2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P19 At=enda Check Resister 7/13/2011 through 7/26/2011 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name - Amount AP - 00312361 7/13/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 36.17 AP - 00312361 7/13/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 36.17 AP - 003 ] 2361 7/13/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 36.47 AP - 00312361 7/13/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 127.85 AP - 00312361 7/13/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 36.17 AP - 00312361 7/13/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 51.69 AP - 00312361 7/13/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 41.16 AP - 00312361 7/13/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 38.01 AP - 00312361 7/13/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 38.01 AP - 00312361 7/13/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 36.17 AP - 00312361 7/13/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 33.09 AP - 00312361 7/13/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 38.01 AP - 00312361 7/13/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 36.35 AP - 00312361 7/13/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 38.01 AP - 00312361 7/13/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 38.01 AP - 00312361 7/13/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 38.56 AP - 00312361 7/13/201 I VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 56.09 AP - 00312361 7/13/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 105.58 AP - 00312361 7/13/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 41.27 AP - 00312361 7/13/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 35.63 AP - 00312361 7/13/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 22.27 AP - 00312361 7/13/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 38.01 AP - 00312361 7/13/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 18.93 AP - 00312361 7/13/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 0.34 AP - 00312361 7/13/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 38.01 AP - 00312361 7/13/201 I VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 0.13 AP - 00312361 7/13/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 0.13 AP - 00312361 7/13/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 1.13 AP - 00312361 7/13/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 0.13 AP - 00312361 7/13/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 0.13 AP - 00312361 7/13/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 36.17 AP - 00312361 7/13/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 36.23 AP - 00312361 7/13/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 38.39 AP - 00312361 7/] 3/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 67.09 AP - 00312361 7/13/201 ] VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 38.97 AP - 00312361 7/13/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 35.41 AP - 00312361 7/13/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 64.34 AP - 00312361 7/13/201 I VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 37.06 AP - 00312361 7/13/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 41.17 AP - 00312361 7/13/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 36.2] AP - 00312361 7/13/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 41.17 AP - 00312361 7/13/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 38.13 AP - 00312361 7/13/201 I VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 47.96 AP - 00312361 7/13/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 36.49 AP - 00312361 7/13/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 39.26 AP - 00312361 7/13/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 307.74 AP - 00312361 7/13/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 39.46 AP - 00312361 7/13/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 42.84 AP - 00312361 7/13/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 43.74 AP - 00312361 7/13/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 41.21 AP - 00312361 7/13/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 56.07 AP - 00312361 7/13/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 39.16 AP - 00312361 7/13/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 108.96 AP - 00312361 7/13/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 62.65 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 12 Current Date: 07/27/201 ReporhCK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAI T_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 09:25:2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P20 Agenda Check Register 7/]3/2011 through?/26/2011 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00312361 7/13/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 39.16 AP - 00312361 7/13/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 41.17 . AP - 00312361 7/13/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 60.00 AP - 00312361 7/13/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 44.25 AP - 00312361 7/13/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 33.40 AP - 00312361 7/13/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 39.66 AP - 00312361 7/13/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 45.15 AP - 00312361 7/13/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 120.21 AP - 00312361 7/13/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 42.16 AP - 00312361 7/13/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 42.16 AP - 00312361 7/13/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 42.16 AP - 00312361 7/13/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 42.16 AP - 00312361 7/13/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 39.16 AP - 00312361 7/13/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 36.17 AP - 00312361 7/13/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 36.17 AP - 00312361 7/13/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 36.43 AP - 00312361 7/13/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 36.17 AP - 00312361 7/13/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 44.03 AP - 00312361 .7/13/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 64.11 AP - 00312361 7/13/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 36.27 AP - 00312361 7/13/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 36.17 AP - 00312361 7/13/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 42.16 AP - 00312361 7/13/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 42.16 AP - 00312361 7/13/20] 1 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 47.15 AP - 00312361 7/13/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA ~ 45.15 AP - 00312361 7/13/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 67.75 AP - 00312361 7/13/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 47.15 AP - 00312361 7/13/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 45.15 AP - 00312361 7/13/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 77.65 AP - 00312361 7/13/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 62.65 AP - 00312361 7/13/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 40.41 AP - 00312361 7/13/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 39.41 AP - 00312361 7/13/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 37.16 AP - 00312361 7/13/2011. VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 39.16 AP - 00312361 7/13/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 39.16 AP - 00312361 7/13/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 67.10 AP - 00312361 7/13/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 87.00 AP - 00312361 7/13/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 60.90 AP - 00312361 7/13/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 42.33 AP - 0031236] 7/13/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 51.16 AP - 00312361 7/13/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 6772 AP - 00312361 7/13/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 38.01 AP - 00312361 7/13/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 41.16 AP - 00312361 7/13/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 59.66 AP - 00312361 7/13/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 59.66 AP - 00312361 7/13/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 36.17 AP - 00312361 7/13/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 80.84 AP - 00312361 7/13/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 36.17 AP - 00312361 7/13/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 36.17 AP - 00312361 7/13/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 36.17 AP - 00312361 7/13/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 36.71 AP - 00312361 7/13/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 72.18 AP - 00312361 7/13/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 36.17 AP - 00312361 7/13/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 36.17 User: VLOPEZ -Veron ica Lopez Page: 13 Current Date: 07/27/201 Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAI T_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 09:25:2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AEenda Check Reffister 7/13/2011 through 7/26/2011 Check No, Check Date Vendor Name AP - 00312361 7/13/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA AP - 00312361 7/13/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA AP - 00312361 7/13/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA AP - 00312361 7/13/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA AP - 00312361 7/13/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA AP - 00312361 7/13/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA AP - 00312361 7/13/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA AP - 00312361 7/13/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA AP - 00312361 7/13/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA AP - 00312361 7/13/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA AP - 00312361 7/13/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA AP - 00312361 7/13/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA AP - 00312361 7/13/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA AP - 00312361 7/13/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA AP - 00312361 7/13/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA AP - 00312361 7/19/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA AP - 00312361 7/13/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA AP - 00312361 7/13/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA AP - 00312361 7/13/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA AP - 00312361 7/13/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA AP - 00312361 7/13/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA AP - 00312361 7/13/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA AP - 00312361 7/13/20] 1 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA AP - 00312361 7/13/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA AP - 00312361 7/13/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA AP - 00312361 7/13/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA AP - 00312361 7/13/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA AP - 00312361 7/13/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA AP - 00312361 7/13/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA AP - 00312362 7/13/2011 WAGNER PARTNERSHIP, THE AP - 00312363 7/13/2011 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO AP - 00312363 7/13/2011 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO AP - 00312363 7/13/2011 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO AP - 00312363 7/13/2011 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO AP - 0031?363 7/13/2011 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO AP - 00312363 7/13/2011 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO AP - 00312363 7/13/2011 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO AP - 00312363 7/13/2011 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO AP - 00312363 7/13/2011 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO AP - 00312363 7/13/2011 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO AP - 00312363 7/13/2011 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO AP - 00312364 7/13/2011 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY AP - 00312364 7/13/2011 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY AP - 00312364 7/13/2011 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY AP - 003]2364 7/13/2011 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY AP - 00312364 7/13/2011 . WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY AP - 00312365 7/13/2011 WESCO RECEIVABLES CORP AP - 00312366 7/13/2011 WEST COAST SAND AND GRAVEL INC AP - 00312367 7/13/2011 WEST PAYMENT CENTER AP - 00312368 7/13/2011 WEST SANITATION SERVICES INC AP - 00312369 7/13/2011 WILLIAM LYON HOMES INC AP - 00312370 7/13/2011 WILSON AND BELL AP - 00312371 7/13/2011 ZAILO, ROBERT W AP - 00312372 7/13/2011 ZAVALA, PETER P21 Amount 36.17 36.29 30.41 36.17 30.43 36.17 21.02 44.55 69.34 36.19 59.98 0.00 36.17 41.17 66.54 49.21 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 38.01 36.17 36.17 0.13 38.01 16.46 166.52 1,876.69. . 89.56 377.39 67.69 86.06 19.36 150.80 201.68 65.69 59.94 1,044.43 61.87 21.17 25.52 909.39 216.63 1,220.38 321.00 370.10 2,900.00 316.34 273.00 276.00 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 14 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Current Date: 07/27/201 Time: 09:25:2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P22 Aslenda Check Register 7/13/2011 through 7/26/2011 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amoun[ AP - 00312374 7/13/2011 ALESSIO, ANTHONY 250.00 AP - 00312375 7/13/2011 ALHS ALL SPORTS BOOSTER CLUB 500.00 AP - 00312376 7/13/2011 ALJUNIDI, ASMAA 305.00 AP - 00312377 7/13/201 I ALTA LOMA HIGH SCHOOL 1,982.00 AP - 00312377 7/13/2011 ALTA LOMA HIGH SCHOOL 18.00 AP - 00312378 7/13/201 I ALVA, IVY 80.00 AP - 00312379 7/13/201 I ALVERADO, CANDY 250.00 AP - 00312380 7/13/2011 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES 3.35 AP - 00312381 7/13/2011 ASCAP 1,240.59 AP - 00312382 7/13/2011 AYANTRA INC. 768.00 AP - 00312383 7/13/2011 BIERMAN, V. MICHELLE 200.00 AP - 00312384 7/13/2011 BLACKMAN, HAILE 700.00 AP - 00312385 7/13/2011 BOLIVAR, EMILIO 15.00 AP - 00312386 7/13/2011 ~ BROOKS, DONNA 40.00 AP - 00312387 7/13/2011 CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE TAX BOARD 25.00 AP - 00312388 7/13/2011 CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE TAX BOARD 50.00 AP - 00312389 7/13/2011 CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE TAX BOARD 200.00 AP - 00312390 7/13/2011 CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE TAX BOARD 125.90 AP - 00312391 7/13/2011 CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE TAX BOARD 50.00 AP - 00312392 7/13/2011 CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE TAX BOARD 150.00 AP - 00312393 7/13/201 I CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE TAX BOARD 100.00 AP - 00312394 7/13/201 I CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE TAX BOARD 294.29 AP - 00312395 7/13/2011 CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE TAX BOARD 111.93 AP - 00312396 7/13/2011 CARDENAS, LARENZA 80.00 AP - 00312397 7/13/2011 CERVANTES, LACI 92.00 AP - 00312398 7/13/2011 CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT DIVISION 175.00 AP - 00312399 7/13/2011 CIOCCA, JACQUELINE 15.00 AP - 00312400 7/13/2011 CLAYTON, DONNA 20.00 AP - 00312401 7/13/2011 CONTINENTAL AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPS 103.98 AP - 00312401 7/13/201 I CONTINENTAL AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPS 16.39 AP - 00312402 7/13/2011 DELTA DENTAL 39,172.18 AP - 00312403 7/13/2011 DIAMOND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 622.86 AP - 00312404 7/13/2011 DIZON, TOMAI 10.00 AP - 00312405 7/13/2011 ENGLAND, ALISON 200.00 AP - 00312406 7/13/2011 ENVISIONWARE INC. 1,127.95 AP - 00312406 7/13/2011 ENVISIONWARE INC. 1,127.95 AP - 00312407 7/13/2011 FARISS, KATHLEEN 132.00 AP - 00312408 7/13/2011 FOX, MICHELE 169.00 AP - 00312409 7/13/2011 GARRETT, ERIC 500.00 AP - 00312410 7/13/2011 GIRL SCOUT TROOP 11024 65.00 AP - 00312411 7/13/2011 GOH, EUGENE 50.00 AP - 003 ] 2412 7/13/2011 GONZALEZ, LLIANA 42.00 AP - 00312413 7/13/2011 GOPEZ, MARY JO ]0.00 AP - 00312414 7/13/2011 GRANICUS INC' 1,100.00 AP - 00312415 7/13/2011 HARBOUR, CAROL 964.00 AP - 00312416 7/13/2011 HEAGSTEDT, YVETTE 50.00 AP - 00312417 .7/13/2011 HERNANDEZ, MARIA 5.00 AP - 00312418 7/13/2011 HOLLIFIELD, MON[CA 181.00 AP - 00312419 7/13/2011 HRYNAZUK, BOB 10.00 AP - 00312422 7/13/2011 INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE 75.00 AP - 00312423 7/13/2011 JAVIER, CELERINA 130.00 AP - 00312424 7/13/201 I JIMENEZ, KELLY 6.52 AP - 00312425 7/13/201 I JIMENEZ, STELLA 20.00 AP - 00312426 7/13/2011 JUKKA, JEFF 120.00 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 15 Curren[ Date: 07/27/201 Report: CK_AGENDA_R EG_PORTRAI T_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 09:25:2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P23 Agenda Check Resister 7/13/20] 1 through 7/26/2011 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00312427 7/13/2011 K K WOODWORKING 54.38 AP - 00312428 7/13/2011 KNIGHT, JOELLIE 105.00 AP - 00312429 7/13/2011 LEDEZMA, MARIA 12.00 AP - 00312430 7/13/2011 LUCAS, DIAMOND 72.50 AP - 00312431 7/13/2011 LUNA BLANCA LLC 2,000.00 AP - 00312432 7/13/2011 MANNION, MELISSA 20.00 AP - 00312433 7/13/2011 MARTIN, DANIELLE 250.00 AP - 00312434 7/] 3/2011 MARTINEZ, GRACE 75.00 AP - 00312434 7/13/2011 MARTINEZ, GRACE 150.00 AP - 00312435 7/13/2011 MELENDREZ, EVA 80.00 AP - 00312436 7/13/2011 MORRIS, DOUG 250.00 AP - 00312437 7/13/2011 MUNICIPAL CODE CORPORATION 500.00 AP - 00312438 7/13/20] 1 NEAL, DAVID 5.00 AP - 00312439 7/13/2011 NEWMAN, JUANITA 12.00 AP - 00312440 7/13/201 t NIMAKO, SOLOMON 26.92 AP - 00312441 7/13/2011 ORTIZ, DEBBIE 500.00 AP - 00312442 7/13/2011 PACIFIC TELEMANAGEMENT SERVICES 3,825.00 AP - 00312443 7/13/2011 PAINTER, MICHAEL 52.00 AP - 00312444 7/13/2011 PAL CAMPAIGN 50.00 AP - 00312445 7/13/2011 PELAYO, RENEE 5.00 AP - 00312446 7/13/2011 PEPSI-COLA 1,382.55 AP - 00312447 7/13/2011 PERPETUAL STORAGE INC 2,474.98 AP - 00312448 7/13/201 I PRE-PAID LEGAL SERVICES INC 11.40 AP - 00312448 7/13/2011 PRE-PAID LEGAL SERVICES INC 168.48 AP - 00312449 7/13/2011 RANDALL, WILLIAM 163.00 AP - 00312450 7/13/2011 RCPFA 9,184.03 AP - 00312451 7/13/2011 REGALADO, LISSETTE 20.00 AP - 00312452 7/13/2011 RENSLOW, JANET ,1,250.00 AP - 00312453 7/13/2011 RHODES, ERICA 135.00 AP - 00312454 7/13/20] 1 ROBERTS, JOSHUA 12.00 AP - 00312455 7/13/2011 KOWLAND, LAURA 140.00 AP - 00312456 7/13/2011 RUBIO, RONDA 1,800.00 AP - 00312457 7/13/2011 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY 55,143.75 AP - 00312458 7/13/2011 SBPEA 701.48 AP - 00312459 7/13/2011 SE\VELL, MICHAEL 80.00 AP - 00312460 7/13/2011 SHERIFFS COURT SERVICES 150.00 AP - 00312461 7/13/2011 SHERIFFS COURT SERVICES 30.51 AP - 00312462 7/13/2011 SHERIFFS COURT SERVICES 194.11 AP - 00312463 7/13/2011 SMITH, LUCINDA 150.00 AP - 00312464 7/13/2011 SPERLING, LEONA 50.00 AP - 00312465 7/13/2011 STOFA, JOSEPH 11.00 AP - 00312466 7/13/2011 TAX SHELTER ASSOCIATES INC 250.00 AP - 00312467 7/13/2011 TORO, EDNA 22.00 AP - 00312468 7/13/2011 UJOR, WILLIE 80.00 AP - 00312469 7/13/2011 UNITED WAY 11.00 AP - 00312469 7/13/2011 UNITED WAY 235.50 AP - 00312470 7/13/20] 1 VARGAS, MARIA 250.00 AP - 00312471 7/13/2011 VILLEGAS, BLANCA 15.00 AP - 00312472 7/13/2011 VIRTUAL PROJECT MANAGER INC 500.00 AP - 00312473 7/13/2011 WEAKLAND, NICHOLE 97.00 AP - 00312474 7/13/2011 WESTCOAST MEDIA 1,485.00 AP - 00312474 7/13/201 I WESTCOAST MEDIA -297.00 AP - 00312474 7/13/2011 WESTCOAST MEDIA 25.00 AP - 00312475 7/13/2011 WILLIAMS, EDDIE 25.00 User: VLOPEZ -Veron ica Lopez Page: 16 Current Date: 07/27/201 Report: CK_AGENDA_R EG_PORTRAI T_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 09:25:2 CITY OF RANCHO CIJCAMONGA P24 Agenda Check Resister 7/13/2011 through 7/26/2011 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00312476. 7/13/201 I WILSON, EDDIE 25.00 AP - 00312477 7/13/2011 WOODS, LENA 20.00 AP - 00312478 7/13/2011 ZEPEDA, DESIREE 25.00 AP - 00312479 7/14/2011 ABC LOCKSMITHS 9.79 AP - 00312479 7/14/2011 ABC LOCKSMITHS 7.07 AP - 00312480 7/14/2011 AIRGAS WEST 228.41 AP - 00312483 7/14/2011 BRODART BOOKS 53.82 AP - 00312483 7/14/2011 BRODART BOOKS 18.05 AP - 00312483 7/14/2011 BRODART BOOKS 392.54 AP - 00312483 7/14/2011 BRODART BOOKS 152.60 AP - 00312483 7/14/2011 BRODART BOOKS 410.55 AP - 00312483 7/14/2011 BRODART BOOKS 347.44 AP - 00312483 7/14/2011 BRODART BOOKS 18.05 AP - 00312483 7/14/2011 BRODART BOOKS 27.06 AP - 00312483 7/14/2011 BRODART BOOKS 4.51 AP - 00312483 7/14/201 I BRODART BOOKS 46.98 AP - 00312483 7/14/2011 BRODART BOOKS 6.69 AP - 00312483 7/14/2011 BRODART BOOKS 9.02 AP - 00312483 7/14/2011 BRODART BOOKS 31.27 AP - 00312483 7/14/2011 BRODART BOOKS 44.95 AP - 00312483 7/14/2011 BRODART BOOKS 62.54 AP - 00312483 7/14/2011 BRODART BOOKS 74.04 AP - 00312483 7/14/2011 BRODART BOOKS 90.20 AP - 00312483 7/14/2011 BRODART BOOKS 53.82 AP - 00312483 7/14/2011 BRODART BOOKS 6.69 AP - 00312483 7/14/2011 BRODART BOOKS 9.02 AP - 00312483 7/14/2011 BRODART BOOKS 35.93 AP - 00312483 7/14/2011 BRODART BOOKS 15.71 AP - 00312483 7/14/2011 BRODART BOOKS 160.34 AP - 00312483 7/14/2011 BRODART BOOKS 145.20 AP - 00312483 7/14/2011 BRODART BOOKS 351.06 AP - 00312483 7/14/2011 BRODART BOOKS 30.51 AP - 00312483 7/14/2011 BRODART BOOKS 99.74 AP - 00312483 7/14/2011 BRODART BOOKS 4729 AP - 00312483 7/14/2011 BRODART BOOKS 1,010.69 AP - 00312483 7/14/2011 . BRODART BOOKS 842.83 AP - 00312483 7/14/2011 BRODART BOOKS 43.59 AP - 00312483 7/14/2011 BRODART BOOKS 86.29 AP - 00312483 7/14/2011 BRODART BOOKS 9.60 AP - 00312483 7/14/2011 BRODART BOOKS 103.28 AP - 00312483 7/14/2011 BRODART BOOKS 351.27 AP - 00312483 7/14/2011 BRODART BOOKS 205.90 AP - 00312483 7/14/2011 BRODART•BOOKS 34.72 AP - 00312483 7/14/2011 BRODART BOOKS 21.31 AP - 00312483 7/14/2011 BRODART BOOKS 138.96 AP - 00312483 7/14/2011 BRODART BOOKS 10.90 AP - 00312483 7/14/2011 BRODART BOOKS 52.86 AP - 00312483 7/14/2011 BRODART BOOKS 93.83 AP - 00312483 7/14/2011 BRODART BOOKS 14.64 AP - 00312483 7/14/2011 BRODART BOOKS 56.15 AP - 00312483 7/14/2011 BRODART BOOKS 13.53 AP - 00312483. 7/14/2011 BRODART BOOKS 4.51 AP - 00312483 7/14/2011 BRODART BOOKS 15.71 AP - 00312483 7/14/2011 BRODART BOOKS 40.44 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 17 Current Date: 07/27/201 Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 09:25:2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P25 Agenda Check Register 7/13/2011 through 7/26/2011 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 003 ] 2483 7/14/2011 BRODART BOOKS 13.66 AP - 00312483 - 7/14/2011 BRODART BOOKS 95.25 AP - 00312483 7/14/2011 BRODART BOOKS 15.26 AP - 00312483 7/14/2011 BRODART BOOKS 25.45 AP - 00312483 7/14/2011 BRODART BOOKS 38.76 AP - 00312483 7/14/2011 BRODART BOOKS 186.98 AP - 00312483 7/14/2011 BRODART BOOKS 138.86 AP - 00312483 7/14/2011 BRODART BOOKS 302.19 AP - 00312483 7/14/2011 BRODART BOOKS 47.28 AP - 00312483 7/14/2011 BRODART BOOKS 4.51 AP - 00312483 7/14/2011 BRODART BOOKS 53.67 AP - 00312483 7/14/2011 BRODART BOOKS 4.51 AP - 00312483 7/14/2011 BRODART BOOKS 42.47 AP - 00312483 7/14/2011 BRODART BOOKS 4.51 AP - 00312483 7/14/2011 BRODART BOOKS 40.29 AP - 00312483 7/14/2011. BRODART BOOKS 20.22 AP - 00312483 7/14/2011 BRODART BOOKS 27.06 AP - 00312483 7/14/2011 BRODART BOOKS 6.69 AP - 00312483 7/14/201 I BRODART BOOKS 13.38 AP - 00312483 7/14/2011 BRODART BOOKS 29.09 AP - 00312483 7/14/2011 BRODART BOOKS 223.39 AP - 00312483 7/14/2011 BRODART BOOKS 498.56 AP - 0,0312483 7/14/2011 BRODART BOOKS 39.10 AP - 00312483 7/14/2011 BRODART BOOKS 69.71 AP - 00312483 7/14/2011 BRODART BOOKS 21.31 AP - 00312483 7/14/2011 BRODART BOOKS 979.17 AP - 00312483 7/14/2011 BRODART BOOKS 31.24 AP - 00312483 7/14/2011 BRODART BOOKS 43.59 AP - 00312483 7/14/2011 BRODART BOOKS 9.60 AP - 00312483 7/14/2011 BRODART BOOKS 86.29 AP - 00312483 7/14/2011 BRODART BOOKS 34.72 AP - 00312483 7/14/2011 BRODART BOOKS 70.38 AP - 00312483 7/14/201 I BRODART BOOKS 165.23 AP - 00312483 7/14/2011 BRODART BOOKS 139.30 AP - 00312483 7/14/2011 BRODART BOOKS 133.95 AP - 00312483 7/14/2011 BRODART BOOKS 53.85 AP - 00312484 7/14/2011 CALSENSE 1,925.06 AP - 00312485 7/14/2011 DAPPER TIRE CO 837.03 AP - 00312486 7/14/2011 EMCOR SERVICE 10,000.00 AP - 00312486 7/14/2011 EMCOR SERVICE 11,305.50 AP - 00312486 7/14/2011 EMCOR SERVICE 4,129.00 AP - 00312487 7/14/2011 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 310.38 AP - 00312487 7/14/2011 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS ],105.37 AP - 00312488 ~ 7/14/2011 GENERATOR SERVICES CO 1,226.00 AP - 00312488 7/14/2011 GENERATOR SERVICES CO 331.78 AP - 00312488 7/14/2011 GENERATOR SERVICES CO 319.62 AP - 00312489 7/14/2011 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 490.83 AP - 00312489 7/14/2011 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 63.23 AP - 00312489 7/14/2011 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 584.67 AP - 00312489 7/14/2011 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 2,079.80 AP - 00312489 7/14/2011 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 3,469.09 AP - 00312489 7/14/2011 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 2,099.89 AP - 00312489 .7/14/2011 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 50.00 AP - 00312490 7/14/2011 HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS INC 1,938.95 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 18 Current Date: 07/27/201 Repor[:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAI T_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 09:25:2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA A>;enda Check Register 7/13/2011 through 7/26/2011 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00312490 7/14/2011 HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS INC -629.54 AP - 00312490 7/14/2011 HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS INC 1,364.42 AP - 00312490 7/14/2011 HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS INC 765.80 AP - 00312491 7/14/2011 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 112.80 AP - 00312491 7/14/201 I INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 640.60 AP - 00312491 7/14/2011 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 654.60 AP - 00312491 7/14/201 I INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 252.80 AP - 00312491 7/14/2011 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 177.20 AP - 00312491 7/14/2011 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 275.20 AP - 00312491 7/14/2011 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 299.00 AP - 00312491 7/14/2011 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 394.20 AP - 00312491 7/14/2011 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 226.20 AP - 00312491 7/14/2011 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 184.20 AP - 00312491 7/14/201 I INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 787.60 AP - 00312491 7/14/2011 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 141.40 AP - 00312491 7/14/2011 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 658.80 AP - 00312491 7/14/2011 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 299.00 AP - 00312491 7/14/2011 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 283.60 AP - 00312491 7/14/2011 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 821.20 AP - 00312491 7/14/2011 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 643.40 AP - 00312491 7/14/2011 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 621.00 AP - 00312491 7/14/2011 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 680.40 AP - 00312492 7/14/2011 INTERSTATE BATTERIES 371.69 AP - 00312493 7/14/2011 KONICA MINOLTA BUSINESS SOLUTIONS USA 12.00 AP - 00312493 7/14/2011 KONICA MINOLTA BUSINESS SOLUTIONS USA 1,084.56 AP - 00312493 7/14/2011 KONICA MINOLTA BUSINESS SOLUTIONS USA 529.82 AP - 00312493 7/14/2011 KONICA MINOLTA BUSINESS SOLUTIONS USA 1,181.36 AP - 00312494 7/14/2011 NEC UNIFIED SOLUTIONS INC 9,530.54 AP - 00312494 7/14/2011 NEC UNIFIED SOLUTIONS INC 822.50 AP - 00312494 7/14/2011 NEC UNIFIED SOLUTIONS INC 334.50 AP - 00312495 7/20/2011 Al AUTOMOTIVE 77.55 AP - 00312495 7/20/201 ] Al AUTOMOTIVE 187.50 AP - 00312496 7/20/2011 ABM JANITORIAL SW 4,866.30 AP - 00312497 7/20/2011 ACADEMY OF MUSIC 347.20 AP - 00312498 7/20/2011 ACEY DECY EQUIPMENT INC. 404.85 AP - 00312500 7/20/2011 AGAPE EMPLOYMENT 682.00 AP - 00312500 7/20/2011 AGAPE EMPLOYMENT 682.00 AP - 00312500 7/20/2011 AGAPE EMPLOYMENT 682.00 AP - 00312500 7/20/2011 AGAPE EMPLOYMENT 255.80 AP - 00312500 7/20/2011 AGAPE EMPLOYMENT 682.00 AP - 00312500 7/20/2011 AGAPE EMPLOYMENT 622.33 AP - 00312500 7/20/2011 AGAPE EMPLOYMENT 28138 AP - 00312500 7/20/2011 AGAPE EMPLOYMENT 28138 AP - 00312500 7/20/2011 AGAPE EMPLOYMENT 19.19 AP - 00312500 7/20/2011 AGAPE EMPLOYMENT 281.38 AP - 00312500 7/20/2011 AGAPE EMPLOYMENT 613.80 AP - 00312500 7/20/2011 AGAPE EMPLOYMENT 682.00 AP - 00312501 7/20/2011 ALL AMERICAN ASPHALT 323,476.79 AP - 00312501 7/20/2011 ALL AMERICAN ASPHALT -32,347.68 AP - 00312502 7/20/2011 ALL CITIES TOOLS 4,398.75 AP - 00312504 7/20/201 I ALPHAGRAPHICS 137.03 AP - 00312505 7/20/2011 ALTA LOMA HIGH SCHOOL BAND BOOSTERS 500.00 AP - 00312506 7/20/2011 AMERICAN VETERINARY SUPPLY CORP 149.40 AP - 003 ] 2506 7/20/2011 AMERICAN VETERINARY SUPPLY CORP 144.36 P26 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 19 Current Date: 07/27/201 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 09:25:2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P27 Agenda Check Resister 7/13/2011 through 7/26/2011 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00312507 7/20/2011 AMTECH ELEVATOR SERVICES 220.24 AP - 00312507 7/20/2011 AMTECH ELEVATOR SERVICES 256.06 AP - 00312508 7/20/2011 APPLIED METERING TECHNOLOGIES INC 9,314.13 AP - 00312509 .7/20/2011 ARBOR NURSERY PLUS 158.04 AP - 00312509 7/20/2011 ARBOR NURSERY PLUS 220.60 AP - 00312510 7/20/2011 ARC 29.85 AP - 00312511 7/20/2011 ARNOLD FIELDS PAINTING 795.00 AP - 00312512 7/20/2011 ASSI SECURITY 135.00 AP - 00312512 7/20/2011 ASSI SECURITY 260.00 AP - 00312512 7/20/2011 ASSI SECURITY 165.00 AP - 00312512 7/20/2011 ASSI SECURITY 105.00 AP - 00312513 7/20/2011 BARCELO, DEREK 4,250.00 AP - 00312514. 7/20/2011 BARNES AND NOBLE 85.23 AP - 00312514 7/20/2011 BARNES AND NOBLE 62.62 AP - 00312515 7/20/2011 BERTINO AUTOMOTIVE SERVICE 772.63 AP - 00312516 7/20/2011 BOLTON, HEATHER 158.10 AP - 00312516 7/20/2011 BOLTON, HEATHER 34.78 AP - 00312518 7/20/2011 BUTSKO UTILITY DESIGN INC. 7,303.00 AP - 00312519 7/20/2011 CALLACI, ALLEN ]OIIN 1,463.24 AP - 00312520 7/20/2011 CAPITOL BUILDERS HARDWARE INC. 3,980.00 AP - 00312520 7/20/2011 CAPITOL BUILDERS HARDWARE INC. 330.25 AP - 00312521 7/20/2011 CARDINAL INDUSTRIAL FINISHES 502.44 AP - 00312521 7/20/2011 CARDINAL INDUSTRIAL FINISHES 167.48 AP - 00312522 7/20/2011 CERAMIC TILE WORKS & DESIGNS INC. 360.00 AP - 00312525 7/20/2011 CLARKE PLUMBING SPECIALTIES INC. 168.57 AP - 00312526 _ 7/20/2011 COMMUNITY BANK 32,347.68 AP - 00312528 7/20/2011 COP TOWN UNIFORMS INC. 166.28 AP - 00312530 7/20/2011 CRIME SCENE STERI-CLEAN LLC 540.00 AP - 00312531 7/20/2011 CROP PRODUCTION SERVICES INC 635.38 AP - 00312532 7/20/2011 CSD LAND SURVEYING 18,040.00 AP - 00312532 7/20/2011 CSD LAND SURVEYING 5,000.00 AP - 00312534 7/20/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 3,672.45 AP - 00312534 7/20/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 205.05 AP - 00312534 7/20/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 2,410.58 AP - 00312534 .7/20/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 2,695.63 AP - 00312534 7/20/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 321.53 AP - 00312534 7/20/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 7,450.87 AP - 00312534 7/20/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 3,686.78 AP - 00312534 7/20/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 153.44 AP - 00312534 7/20/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 2,168.78 AP - 00312534 7/20/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 2,173.34 AP - 00312534 7/20/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 120.90 AP - 00312534 7/20/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,271.70 AP - 00312534. 7/20/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 185.02 AP - 00312534 7/20/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT SS.82 AP - 00312534 7/20/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 3,060.19 AP-00312534 7/20/2011 CUCAMONGAVALLEYWATERDISTRICT 7,190.25 AP - 00312534 ' 7/20/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 214.83 AP - 00312534 7/20/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 382.11 AP - 00312534 7/20/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 504.57 AP - 00312534 7/20/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,291.77 AP - 00312534 7/20/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 236.45 AP - 00312534 7/20/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 265.07 AP - 00312534 7/20/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 868.74 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 20 Current Date: 07/27/201 Report:CK_AGENDA_R EG_PORTRAI T_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 09:25:2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 7/13/2011 through 7/26/2011 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00312534 7/20/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,037.01 AP - 00312534 7/20/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 4,196.19 AP - 00312534 7/20/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 741.69 AP - 00312534 7/20/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 121.66 AP - 00312534 7/20/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 215.29 AP - 00312534 7/20/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 127.65 AP - 00312534 7/20/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 54.34 AP - 00312534 7/20/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 127.65 AP - 00312534 7/20/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 412.41 AP - 00312534 7/20/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 3,609.59 AP - 00312534 7/20/201 I CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 220.41 AP - 00312534 7/20/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 608.25 AP - 00312534 7/20/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 3,885.26 AP - 00312534 7/20/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 174.33 AP - 00312534 7/20/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 7,619.80 AP - 00312534 7/20/2011. CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 230.43 AP - 00312534 7/20/201 Y CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 80.89 AP - 00312534 7/20/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 233.89 AP - 00312534 7/20/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 222.02 AP - 00312534 7/20/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 426.96 AP - 00312534 7/20/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 420.09 AP - 00312534 7/20/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 18.40 AP - 00312534 7/20/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 351.75 AP - 00312534 7/20/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,643.66 AP - 00312534 7/20/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT .664.76 AP - 00312534 7/20/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 259.21 AP - 00312534 7/20/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 6,971.12 AP - 00312534 7/20/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 153.44 AP - 00312534 7/20/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 862.28 AP - 00312534 7/20/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 149.40 AP - 00312534 7/20/201 I CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 2,022.19 AP - 00312534 7/20/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 432.89 AP - 00312534 7/20/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 93.38 AP - 00312534 7/20/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 4,198.98 AP - 00312534 7/20/201 ] CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 5,278.18 AP - 00312534 7/20/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 58.21 AP - 00312534 7/20/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 2,817.79 AP - 00312534 7/20/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 3,218.59 AP - 00312534 7/20/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 62.02 AP - 00312535 7/20/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 21,618.58 AP - 00312536 7/20/2011 D & D SERVICES INC. 400.00 AP - 00312537 7/20/2011 D.T.S. 50.00 AP - 00312537 7/20/2011 D.T.S. 150.00 AP - 00312537 7/20/2011 D.T.S. 215.00 AP - 00312537 7/20/2011 D.T.S. 200.00 AP -00312538 7/20/201 I DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS (AC 225.00 AP - 00312540 7/20/2011 DIINN EDWARDS CORPORATION 124.52 AP - 00312540 7/20/2011 DUNN EDWARDS CORPORATION 83.70 AP - 00312542 7/20/2011 EMPIRE FLOOR COVERING 2,150.10 AP - 00312543 7/20/2011 ENERGY CONSERVATION & SUPPLY INC. 8,545.50 AP - 00312544 7/20/2011 ENERGY CONSERVATION & SUPPLY INC. 16,977.10 AP - 00312545 7/20/2011 ENNIS PAINT INC. 1,191.03 AP - 00312545 7/20/2011 ENNIS PAINT INC. 297.76 AP - 00312546 7/20/2011 EXPERIAN 52.24 P28 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 21 Current Date: 07/27/201 Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 09:25:2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P29 Asienda Check ReEister 7/13/2011 through 7/26/2011 Check No. Check Dale Vendor Name Amount AP - 00312547 7/20/2011 FASTENAL COMPANY 33.21 AP - 00312548 7/20/2011 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 48.60 AP - 00312549 7/20/2011 FORD OF UPLAND INC 81.50 AP - 00312550 7/20/2011 FRAME ART 288.92 AP - 00312551 7/20/2011 FRAZEE PAINT' CENTER 101.05 AP - 00312552 7/20/2011 GENTRY, DONALD A 1,560.00 AP - 00312553 7/20/201 I GEOGRAPHICS 2,115.19 AP - 00312554 7/20/2011 GLOBAL PRESENTER 2,554.76 AP - 00312555 7/20/2011 GOOD YEAR SOCCER LEAGUE 1,131.00 AP - 00312556 7/20/2011 GRAINGER 3,162.50 AP - 00312556 7/20/2011 GRAINGER 1,200.00 AP - 00312556 7/20/2011 GRAINGER 1,737.71 AP - 00312556 7/20/2011 GRAINGER 3,091.03 AP - 00312556 7/20/2011 GRAINGER 188.41 AP - 00312556 7/20/2011 GRAINGER 5.06 AP - 00312556 7/20/2011 GRAINGER 102.40 AP - 00312556 7/20/201 I GRAINGER 43.77 AP - 00312556 7/20/2011 GRAINGER 613.73 AP - 00312556 7/20/201 I GRAINGER 401.70 AP - 00312556 7/20/2011 GRAINGER 2,294.81 AP - 00312556 7/20/2011 GRAINGER 60.40 AP - 00312558 7/20/201 I GROWEST NURSERIES 212.06 AP - 00312559 7/20/2011 HAAKER EQUIPMENT CO 3,807.40 AP - 00312560 7/20/2011 HEELER ARCHITECT, JOHN 3,795.00 AP - 00312561 7/20/2011 HI WAY SAFETY INC 150.00 AP - 00312562 7/20/2011 HILLS PET NUTRITION SALES INC 943.96 AP - 00312563 7/20/2011 HOSE MAN INC 67.81 AP - 00312564 7/20/2011 HOT SHOTS ATHLETIC APPAREL INC. 1,122.96 AP - 00312565 7/20/2011 HSBC BUSINESS SOLUTIONS 252.46 AP - 00312565 7/20/2011 HSBC BUSINESS SOLUTIONS 147.12 AP - 00312565 7/20/201 ] HSBC BUSINESS SOLUTIONS 100.00 AP - 00312565 7/20/2011 HSBC BUSINESS SOLUTIONS 139.40 AP - 00312565 7/20/20] 1 HSBC BUSINESS SOLUTIONS 276.69 AP - 00312565 7/20/2011 HSBC BUSINESS SOLUTIONS 142.94 AP - 00312565 7/20/2011 HSBC BUSINESS SOLUTIONS 83.01 AP - 00312565 7/20/2011 HSBC BUSINESS SOLUTIONS 1,800.13 AP - 00312565 7/20/201 I HSBC BUSINESS SOLUTIONS 1,452.95 AP - 00312565 7/20/2011 HSBC BUSINESS SOLUTIONS 285.49 AP - 00312566 7/20/2011 HUMANE SOCIETY OF SAN BERNARDINO VALI 421.00 AP - 00312567 7/20/2011 HUNZICKER, THOM 70.00 AP - 00312568 7/20/2011 IMPEX TECHNOLOGIES INC 11,097.00 AP - 00312568 7/20/2011 IMPEX TECHNOLOGIES INC -7,398.00 AP - 00312569 7/20/2011 -INLAND FAIR HOUSING AND MEDIATION BOAI 784.24 AP - 00312570 7/20/2011 INLAND PRESORT & MAILING SERVICES 42.43 AP - 00312570 7/20/2011 INLAND PRESORT & MAILING SERVICES 50.15 AP - 00312570 7/20/2011 INLAND PRESORT & MAILING SERVICES 100.96 AP - 00312570 7/20/2011 INLAND PRESORT & MAILING SERVICES 37.95 AP - 00312570 7/20/2011 INLAND PRESORT & MAILING SERVICES 11.60 AP - 00312570 7/20/2011 INLAND PRESORT & MAILING SERVICES 114.92 AP - 00312571 7/20/2011 INLAND VALLEY COUNCIL OF CHURCHES 1,702.50 AP - 00312572 7/20/2011 INPRO CORPORATION 208.01 AP - 00312573 7/20/2011 INTERNATIONAL LINE BUILDERS INC 34,819.44 AP - 00312574 7/20/2011 INTERNET INC 1,087.50 AP - 00312574 7/20/2011 INTERNET INC 4,745.25 User. VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 22 Current Date: 07/27/201 Report: CK_AGENDA_ REG_PORTRAI T_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 09:25:2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Asenda Check Resister 7/13/2011 through 7/26/2011 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount P30 AP - 00312575 7/20/2011 JACKSON HIRSH INC 98.00 AP - 00312577 7/20/2011 JDC INC 4,530.40 AP - 00312578 7/20/2011 JOHN THE PLUMBER 162.00 AP - 00312579 7/20/2011 JOHNSON MACHINERY COMPANY 20.81 AP - 00312580 7/20/2011 JONES AND MAYER, LAW OFFICES OF 3,897.19 AP - 00312581 7/20/2011 KENT HARRIS TRUCKING & MATERIALS 310.46 AP - 00312583 7/20/2011 KONE INC 539.06 AP - 00312584 7/20/2011 LAIRD CONSTRUCTION CO 18,954.17 AP - 00312584 7/20/2011 LAIRD CONSTRUCTION CO -1,895.42 AP - 00312585 7/20/2011 LEIGHTON CONSULTING INC 1,022.30 AP - 00312586 7/20/2011 LIEBERT CASSIDY WHITMORE 558.00 AP - 00312588 7/20/2011 LOMA LINDA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 25.00 AP - 00312588 7/20/2011 LOMA LINDA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 25.00 AP - 00312588 7/20/2011 LOMA LINDA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 25.00 AP - 00312589 7/20/2011 LOS ANGELES FREIGHTLINER 404.51 AP - 00312589 7/20/2011 LOS ANGELES FREIGHTLINER 230.34 AP - 00312590 7/20/2011 MAIN STREET SIGNS 1,492.59 AP - 00312590 7/20/2011 MAIN STREET SIGNS 14,839.87 AP - 00312590 7/20/201 I MAIN STREET SIGNS 542.93 AP - 00312590 7/20/2011 MAIN STREET SIGNS 1,049.59 AP - 00312591 7/20/2011 MANSFIELD GAS EQUIPMENT SYSTEMS 7]7.00 AP - 00312591 7/20/2011 MANSFIELD GAS EQUIPMENT SYSTEMS 174.13 AP - 00312592 7/20/2011 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 31.81 AP - 00312592 7/20/2011 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 1,581.61 AP - 00312592 7/20/2011 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 291.84 AP - 00312592 7/20/2011 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 3,468.77 AP - 00312592 7/20/2011 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 129.65 AP - 00312592 7/20/2011 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 304.52 AP - 00312592 7/20/201 I MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 3,754.44 AP - 00312592 7/20/2011 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 12,197.13 AP - 00312592 7/20/2011 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 2,111.08 AP - 00312592 7/20/20] 1 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 3,988.67 AP - 00312592 7/20/2011 MARIPOSA HORTICULTLiRAI, ENT INC 5,511.22 AP - 00312592 7/20/2011 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 141.57 AP - 00312592 7/20/2011 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 10,068.56 AP - 00312592 7/20/2011 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 21,536.86 AP - 00312593 7/20/2011 MARK CHRISTOPHER INC 10.81 AP - 00312594 7/20/2011 MATRIX IMAGING PRODUCTS 3,423.33 AP - 00312595 7/20/201 I MCI 36.70 AP - 00312596 7/20/2011 MIDWEST TAPE 14.39 AP - 00312596 7/20/2011 MIDWEST TAPE 66.97 AP - 00312596 7/20/2011 MIDWEST TAPE 24.99 AP - 00312596 7/20/20 ] 1 MIDWEST TAPE 24.99 AP - 00312596 7/20/2011 MIDWEST TAPE 66.97 AP - 00312596 7/20/2011 MIDWEST TAPE 96.97 AP - 00312596 7/20/2011 MIDWEST TAPE 131.96 . AP - 00312597 7/20/2011 MIJAC ALARM COMPANY 100.00 AP - 00312598 7/20/2011 MILANES, YIKCIA 525.00 AP - 00312599 7/20/2011 MOBILE MINI INC 3,393.00 AP - 00312601 7/20/2011 MWI VETERINARY SUPPLY 1,560.14 AP - 00312601 7/20/2011 MWI VETERINARY SUPPLY 638.99 AP - 00312601 7/20/2011 MWI VETERINARY SUPPLY 355.51 AP - 00312601 7/20/2011 MWI VETERINARY SUPPLY 26.84 AP - 00312601 7/20/2011 MWI VETERINARY SUPPLY 29.65 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 23 Current Date: 07/27/201 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 09:25:2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 7/13/2011 through 7/26/20] 1 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00312603 7/20/2011 NEWCOMBE, MIKE 188.00 AP - 00312605 7/20/201 I NEXTEL 1,228.10 AP - 00312606 7/20/20] 1 NOVARTIS ANIMAL HEALTH US INC 3,572.16 AP - 00312606 7/20/2011 NOVARTIS ANIMAL HEALTH US INC 350.00 AP - 00312608 7/20/2011 O'DONNELL CONSTRUCTION INC .52,341.55 AP - 00312608 7/20/2011 O'DONNELL CONSTRUCTION INC 12,084.40 AP - 00312609 7/20/2011 OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH CENTERS OF CALIFO 1,374.00 AP - 00312609 7/20/2011 OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH CENTERS OF CALIFO 100.00 AP - 00312609 7/20/2011 OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH CENTERS OF CALIFO 425.00 AP - 00312609 7/20/2011 OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH CENTERS OF CALIFO 89.57 AP - 00312609 7/20/2011 OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH CENTERS OF CALIFO 193.52 AP - 00312609 7/20/2011 OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH CENTERS OF CALIFO 56.93 AP - 00312609 7/20/2011 OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH CENTERS OF CALIFO 146.12 AP - 00312609 7/20/2011 OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH CENTERS OF CALIFO 211.00 AP - 00312610 7/20/2011 OCLC INC 46.39 AP - 00312612 7/20/2011 OFFICE DEPOT 11.16 AP - 00312612 7/20/2011 OFFICE DEPOT 23.29 AP - 00312612. 7/20/2011 OFFICE DEPOT 6.88 AP - 00312612 7/20/2011 OFFICE DEPOT 486.13 AP - 00312612 7/20/201 I OFFICE DEPOT -486.13 AP - 00312612 7/20/2011 OFFICE DEPOT 140.85 AP - 00312612 7/20/2011 OFFICE DEPOT 21.43 AP - 00312612 7/20/2011 OFFICE DEPOT 839.54 AP - 00312612 7/20/2011 OFFICE DEPOT 1,142.82 AP - 00312612 7/20/2011 OFFICE DEPOT 36.94 AP - 00312612 7/20/2011 OFFICE DEPOT 45.49 AP - 00312612 7/20/2011 OFFICE DEPOT 19.12 AP - 00312612 7/20/2011 OFFICE DEPOT 46.59 AP - 00312612 7/20/2011 OFFICE DEPOT 32.61 AP - 00312612 7/20/2011 OFFICE DEPOT 76.11 AP - 00312612 7/20/2011 OFFICE DEPOT 281.67 AP - 00312612 7/20/2011 OFFICE DEPOT -27.62 AP - 00312612 7/20/201 I OFFICE DEPOT 38.61 AP - 00312612 7/20/2011 OFFICE DEPOT 43.68 AP - 00312612 7/20/2011 OFFICE DEPOT 21.11 AP - 00312612 7/20/2011 OFFICE DEPOT 182.97 AP - 00312612 7/20/2011 OFFICE DEPOT 169.17 AP - 00312612 7/20/2011 OFFICE DEPOT 30.97 AP - 00312612 7/20/2011 OFFICE DEPOT 13.85 AP - 00312612 7/20/2011 OFFICE DEPOT 183.50 AP - 00312612 7/20/2011 OFFICE DEPOT 478.47 AP - 00312612 7/20/2011 OFFICE DEPOT 12.36 AP - 00312612 7/20/2011 OFFICE DEPOT 5.74 AP - 00312612 7/20/2011 OFFICE DEPOT 135.46 AP - 00312612 7/20/2011 OFFICE DEPOT 82.58 AP - 00312612 7/20/2011 OFFICE DEPOT 27.62 AP - 00312612 7/20/2011 OFFICE DEPOT 596.28 AP - 00312612 7/20/2011 OFFICE DEPOT 62.64 AP - 00312612 7/20/2011 OFFICE DEPOT 925.07 AP - 00312612 7/20/2011 OFFICE DEPOT 25.35 AP - 00312612 7/20/2011 OFFICE DEPOT 6.57 AP - 00312612 7/20/2011 OFFICE DEPOT 130.07 AP - 00312612 7/20/2011 OFFICE DEPOT 1,281.74 AP - 00312612 7/20/2011 OFFICE DEPOT 168.94 P31 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 24 Current Dale: 07/27/201 ReporCCK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layou[ Time: 09:25:2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 7/13/2011 through 7/26/20]1 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amoun[ AP - 00312612 7/20/2011 OFFICE DEPOT 54.36 AP - 00312612 7/20/2011 OFFICE DEPOT 63.33 AP - 00312612 7/20/2011 OFFICE DEPOT 12.44 AP - 00312612 7/20/201 I OFFICE DEPOT 193.60 AP - 00312612 7/20/2011 OFFICE DEPOT 24.99 AP - 00312612 7/20/2011 OFFICE DEPOT 99.25 AP - 00312612 7/20/2011 OFFICE DEPOT 291.89 AP - 00312612 7/20/201 I OFFICE DEPOT 27.49 AP - 00312612 7/20/20] 1 OFFICE DEPOT 101.33 AP -00312613 7/20/2011 ONTARIO WINNELSON CO 18.49 AP - 00312613 7/20/2011 ONTARIO WINNELSON CO 848'.25 AP - 00312614 7/20/2011 ONTRAC 69.39 AP - 00312615 7/20/201 I OPEN APPS INC 4,377.19 AP - 00312615 7/20/2011 OPEN APPS INC 875.80 AP - 00312616 7/20/2011 ORTEGA, JAMIE 250.00 AP - 00312617 7/20/2011 PATTON SALES CORP 155.19 AP - 00312618 7/20/2011 PENNY PLUMBING 160.00 AP - 00312619 7/20/2011 PHOENIX GROUP INFORMATION SYSTEMS 442.25 AP - 00312620 7/20/2011 PIRANHA POOL & SPA CONSTRUCTORS INC 250.00 AP - 00312621 7/20/2011 PRECISION CONCRETE CUTTING 1,041.25 AP - 00312622 7/20/2011 PRO SPRAY EQUIPMENT 181.49 AP - 00312623 7/20/2011 PRO-PLANET INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY 224.36 AP - 00312624 7/20/2011 PUBLIC SURPLUS 3,408.32 AP - 00312625 7/20/2011 QWEST 0.35 AP - 00312625 7/20/2011 QWEST 2.13 AP - 00312626 7/20/2011 RAMIREZ, JOSE J 1,135.00 AP - 00312626 7/20/2011 RAMIREZ, JOSE J 136.00 AP - 00312627 7/20/2011 RANCHO ETIWANDA 685 LLC 73,780.00 AP - 00312628 7/20/2011 RANCHO PACIFIC ENGINEERING INC 2,552.65 AP - 003 ] 2628 7/20/2011 RANCHO PACIFIC ENGINEERING INC -255.27 AP - 00312629 7/20/20] 1 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL I 106.55 AP - 00312629 7/20/2011 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL L 505.51 AP - 00312629 7/20/2011 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL L 416.86 AP - 00312629 7/20/2011 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL I 340.76 AP - 00312629 7/20/2011 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL I 120.75 AP - 00312629 7/20/2011 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL I 182.75 AP - 00312630 7/20/2011 RAYGOZA, LISA CONTRERAS 150.00 AP - 00312631 7/20/201 I RDO EQUIPMENT COMPANY 222.40 AP - 00312633 7/20/2011 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 152.00 AP - 00312634 7/20/2011 RIPPETOE MILES LLP 12,049.53 AP - 00312634 7/20/2011 RIPPETOE MILES LLP 285.36 AP - 00312634 7/20/2011 RIPPETOE MILES LLP 2.25 AP - 00312634 7/20/2011 RIPPETOE MILES LLP 569.80 AP - 00312634 7/20/2011 RIPPETOE MILES LLP 675.03 AP - 003 ] 2634 7/20/2011 RIPPETOE MILES LLP 2,564.20 AP - 00312634 7/20/201 I RIPPETOE MILES LLP 1,167.39 AP - 00312634 7/20/2011 RIPPETOE MILES LLP 4,697.45 AP - 00312634 7/20/2011 RIPPETOE MILES LLP 97.98 AP - 00312634 7/20/2011 RIPPETOE MILES LLP 1,218.45 AP - 00312634 7/20/2011 RIPPETOE MILES LLP 1,447.10 AP - 00312634 7/20/2011 RIPPETOE MILES LLP 158.44 AP - 00312634 7/20/2011 RIPPETOE MILES LLP 52.35 AP - 00312635 7/20/2011 ROADRUNNER PHARMACY 69.95 AP - 00312635 7/20/2011 ROADRUNNER PHARMACY 701.03 P32 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 25 Current Date: 07/27/201 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 09:25:2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AEenda Check ReEister 7/13/2011 through 7/26/2011 Check No. .Check Date Vendor Name - Amount AP - 00312636 7/20/2011 RUBENS AUTO COLLISION CENTER 100.00 AP - 00312638 7/20/2011 SBC TAX COLLECTOR 300.00 AP - 00312639 7/20/2011 SC FUELS - 16,661.53 AP - 00312639 7/20/2011 SC FUELS 12,065.24 AP - 00312639 7/20/2011 SC FUELS 5,980.56 AP - 00312640 7/20/2011 SERVAN TEZ, CYNTHIA 600.00 AP - 00312640 7/20/2011 SERVANTEZ, CYNTHIA 250.00 AP - 003]2640 7/20/2011 SERVANTEZ, CYNTHIA 200.00 AP - 00312640 7/20/2011 SERVANTEZ, CYNTHIA 475.00 AP - 00312640 7/20/2011 SERVANTEZ, CYNTHIA 525.00 AP - 00312640 7/20/2011 SERVANTEZ, CYNTHIA 150.00 AP - 00312641 7/20/2011 SEVERSON PRODUCTS COMPANY 282.40 AP - 00312642 7/20/2011 SIGN SHOP, THE 21.75 AP - 00312642 7/20/2011 SIGN SHOP, THE 10.88 AP - 00312643 7/20/2011 SIMPLOT PARTNERS 5,525.71 AP - 00312644 7/20/2011 SKIDRIL INDUSTRIES LLC 1,324.00 AP - 00312645 7/20/201 ] SOCIAL VOCATIONAL SERVICES 710.00 AP - 00312645 7/20/2011 SOCIAL VOCATIONAL SERVICES 690.00 AP - 00312645 7/20/2011 SOCIAL VOCATIONAL SERVICES 650.00 AP - 00312650 7/20/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.53 AP - 00312650 7/20/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.64 AP - 00312650 7/20/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.06 AP - 00312650 7/20/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.19 AP - 00312650 7/20/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.19 AP - 00312650 7/20/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.87 AP - 00312650 7/20/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 72.67 AP - 00312650 7/20/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 0.96 AP - 00312650 7/20/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.06 AP - 00312650 7/20/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 2287 AP - 00312650 7/20/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 46.69 AP - 00312650 7/20/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 47.1 I AP - 00312650 7/20/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 56.76 AP - 00312650 7/20/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.96 AP - 00312650 7/20/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 7622 AP - 00312650 7/20/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 60.19 AP - 00312650 7/20/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 2287 AP - 00312650 7/20/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 53.48 AP - 00312650 7/20/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 38.91 AP - 00312650 7/20/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 2287 AP - 00312650 7/20/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 2287 AP - 00312650 7/20/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 8238 AP - 00312650 7/20/201 I SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.43 AP - 00312650 7/20/20] I SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 74.55 AP - 00312650 7/20/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 34.67 AP - 00312650 7/20/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.43 AP - 00312650 7/20/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.87 AP - 00312650 7/20/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON ] 60.50 AP - 003 ] 2650 7/20/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 44.00 AP - 00312650 7/20/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 2.80 AP - 00312650 7/20/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 45.53 AP - 00312650 7/20/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 175.72 AP - 00312650 7/20/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 21.99 AP - 00312650 7/20/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.53 AP - 00312650 7/20/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 65.73 P33 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 26 Current Date: 07/27/201 Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 09:25:2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 7/13/2011 through 7/26/2011 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name AP - 00312650 7/20/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00312650 7/20/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00312650 7/20/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00312650 7/20/201 I SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00312650 7/20/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00312650 7/20/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00312650 7/20/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00312650 7/20/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00312650 7/20/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00312650 7/20/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00312650 7/20/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00312650 7/20/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00312650 7/20/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00312650 7/20/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00312650 7/20/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00312650 7/20/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00312650 7/20/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00312650 7/20/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00312650 7/20/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00312650 7/20/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00312650 7/20/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00312650 7/20/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00312650 7/20/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00312650 7/20/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00312650 7/20/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00312650 7/20/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00312650 7/20/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00312650 7/20/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00312650 7/20/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00312650 7/20/201 I SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AY - 00312650 7/20/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00312650 7/20/201 ] SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00312650 7/20/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00312650 7/20/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00312650 7/20/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00312650 7/20/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00312650 7/20/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00312650 7/20/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00312650 7/20/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00312650 7/20/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 003 ] 2650 7/20/20 ] 1 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 003 ]2650 7/20/201 ] SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00312650 7/20/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00312650 7/20/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00312650 7/20/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00312650 7/20/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00312650 7/20/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00312650 7/20/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00312650 7/20/20] 1 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00312650 7/20/201 ] SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00312650 7/20/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00312650 7/20/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 003 ] 2650 7/20/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AP - 00312650 7/20/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON P34 Amount 86.22 126.95 81.97 178.03 37.20 24.53 22.67 23.74 100.43 21,99 48.78 24.07 23.43 24.53 24.53 44.25 21.65 123.98 74.40 87.78 22.87 23.06 22.87 23.63 23.43 25.25 209.01 9.86 58.39 S 8.03 366.12 24.53 0.87 23.06 23.06 174.66 41.18 26.73 204.66 35.88 20.91 23.06 23.06 23.06 23.06 23.06 54.09 340.98 596.73 697.51 935.56 22,20 21.16 24.79 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 27 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Curren[ Date: 07/27/201 Time: 09:25:2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P35 Agenda Check Reeister 7/13/2011 through 7/26/2011 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00312650 7/20/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.68 AP - 00312650 7/20/201 I SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 36.92 AP - 00312650 7/20/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 72.08 AP - 00312650 7/20/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.16 AP - 00312650 7/20/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 51.45 AP - 00312650 7/20/2011 .SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.62 AP - 00312650 7/20/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 27.46 AP - 00312650 7/20/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 21.99 AP - 00312650 7/20/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 21.99 AP - 00312650 7/20/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 111.52 AP - 00312650 7/20/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 160.86 AP - 00312650 7/20/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 96.80 AP - 00312650 7/20/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 109.90 AP - 00312650 7/20/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.46 AP - 00312650 7/20/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 42.68 AP - 00312650 7/20/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 33.98 AP - 00312650 7/20/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 49.50 AP - 00312650 7/20/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 4287 AP - 00312650 7/20/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 71.65 AP - 00312650 7/20/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 109.79 AP - 00312650 7/20/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 1,379.14 AP - 00312650 7/20/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 28.04 AP - 00312650 7/20/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 71.16 AP - 00312650 7/20/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 68.45 AP - 00312650 7/20/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.53 AP - 00312650 7/20/201 I SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 48.85 AP - 00312650 7/20/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.17 AP - 00312650 7/20/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 59.84 AP - 00312650 7/20/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 74.64 AP - 00312650 7/20/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.64 AP - 00312650 7/20/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 21.99 AP - 00312650 7/20/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 886.52 AP - 00312650 7/20/201 I SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.87 AP - 00312650 .7/20/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.13 AP - 00312650 7/20/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 593.]0 AP - 00312650 7/20/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 185.69 AP - 00312650 7/20/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON ] 70.20 AP - 00312650 7/20/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.60 AP - 00312650 7/20/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.69 AP - 00312650 7/20/201 I SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 48.50 AP - 00312650 7/20/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 101.11 AP - 00312650 7/20/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 82.02 AP - 00312650 7/20/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.09 AP - 00312650 7/20/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 21.99 AP - 00312650 7/20/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 73.96 AP - 00312650 7/20/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 156.92 AP - 00312650 7/20/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 83.14 AP - 00312650 7/20/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.14 AP - 00312650 7/20/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 7.58 AP - 00312650 7/20/201 ] SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 108.99 AP - 00312650 7/20/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 0.96 AP - 003 ] 2650 7/20/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 43.35 AP - 00312650 7/20/201 I SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 46.24 AP - 00312650 7/20/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.06 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 28 Current Dale: 07/27/201 Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 09:25:2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P36 Agenda Check Register 7/13/2011 through 7/26/2011 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00312650 7/20/20] ] SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.06 AP - 00312650 7/20/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 67.04 AP - 00312650 7/20/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 2287 AP - 00312650 7/20/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.87 AP - 00312650 7/20/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.19 AP - 00312650 7/20/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.46 AP - 00312650 7/20/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.53 AP - 00312650 7/20/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 20.52 AP - 00312650 7/20/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.06 AP - 00312650 7/20/201 ] SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.1 S AP - 00312650 7/20/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 67.91 AP - 00312650 7/20/201 I SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 60.92 AP - 00312650 7/20/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.06 AP - 00312650 7/20/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 112.92 AP - 00312650 7/20/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.87 AP - 00312650 7/20/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.06 AP - 00312650 7/20/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 75.67 AP - 00312650 7/20/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.70 AP - 00312650 7/20/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 21.99 AP - 00312650 7/20/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 10.72 AP - 00312650 7/20/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 3.04 AP - 00312650 7/20/201 I SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.56 AP - 00312650 7/20/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 2272 AP - 00312650 7/20/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 72.74 AP - 00312650 7/20/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 120.53 AP - 00312650 7/20/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 2270 AP - 00312650 7/20/201 I SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 43.35 AP - 00312650 7/20/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.06 AP - 00312651 7/20/20 ] 1 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 45,969.89 AP - 00312651 7/20/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16,291.22 AP - 00312651 7/20/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 3,S 13.02 AP - 00312651 7/20/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12,699.08 AP - 00312651 7/20/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 41.25 AP - 00312651 7/20/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 72.94 AP - 00312651 7/20/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13,961.34 AP - 00312651 7/20/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 127.47 AP - 00312651 7/20/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 36.94 AP - 00312651 7/20/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 4,888.62 AP - 00312651 7/20/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 5,153.37 AP - 00312651 7/20/201 ] SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 11,247.40 AP - 00312651 7/20/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 1,443.87 AP - 00312651 7/20/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.62 AP - 00312651 7/20/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 35.26 AP - 00312651 7/20/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 44.48 AP - 00312651 7/20/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 29.57 AP - 00312651 7/20/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 4,130.17 AP - 00312651 7/20/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 5,617.66 AP - 00312651 7/20/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 8,727.16 AP - 00312651 7/20/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22,166.03 AP - 00312651 7/20/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22,166.03 AP - 00312652 7/20/20] 1 SPANDEX USA 60.38 AP - 00312653 7/20/2011 SPECTRUM CARE LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATIO 11,997.06 AP - 00312653 7/20/2011 SPECTRUM CARE LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATIO 37,514.68 AP - 003 ] 2653 7/20/2011 SPECTRUM CARE LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATIO 8,685.06 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 29 Current Date: 07/27/201 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAI T_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 09:25:2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 7/13/2011 through 7/26/2011 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00312653 7/20/2011 SPECTRUM CARE LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATIO 36.49 AP - 00312654 7/20/201 I STEELWORKERS OLDTIMERS FOUNDATION 939.24 AP - 00312656 7/20/2011 TERRA VISTA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50.00 AP - 00312656 7/20/2011 TERRA VISTA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 25.00 AP - 00312657 7/20/2011 THERMAL COMBUSTION INNOVATORS INC 69.80 AP - 00312657 7/20/2011 THERMAL COMBUSTION INNOVATORS INC 70.01 AP - 00312657 7/20/2011 THERMAL COMBUSTION INNOVATORS INC 154.72 AP - 00312657 7/20/2011 THERMAL COMBUSTION INNOVATORS INC 140.15 AP - 00312657 7/20/2011 THERMAL COMBUSTION INNOVATORS INC 170.65 AP - 00312657 7/20/2011 THERMAL COMBUSTION INNOVATORS INC 93.58 AP - 00312657 7/20/201 I THERMAL COMBUSTION INNOVATORS INC 155.07 AP - 00312657 7/20/2011 THERMAL COMBUSTION INNOVATORS INC 140.14 AP - 00312657 7/20/2011 THERMAL COMBUSTION INNOVATORS INC 170.62 AP - 00312659 7/20/2011 U S LEGAL SUPPORT INC 152.97 AP - 00312659 7/20/2011 U S LEGAL SUPPORT INC 133.70 AP - 00312659 7/20/201 I U S LEGAL SUPPORT INC 117.25 AP - 00312659 7/20/2011 U S LEGAL SUPPORT INC 58.73 AP - 00312660 7/20/2011 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 153.70 AP - 00312660 7/20/2011 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 46.20 AP - 00312660 7/20/2011 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 119.35 AP - 00312660 7/20/2011 UNPiIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 73.93 AP - 00312660 7/20/2011. UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 25.85 AP - 00312660 7/20/2011 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 733.57 AP - 00312661 7/20/2011 UNIQUE MANAGEMENT SERVICES INC 797.33 AP - 00312662 7/20/2011 UNITED ROTARY BRUSH CORPORATION 1,886.62 AP - 00312662 7/20/2011 UNITED ROTARY BRUSH CORPORATION 2,690.78 AP - 00312662 7/20/2011 UNITED ROTARY BRUSH CORPORATION 522.54 AP - 00312663 7/20/2011 UNITED SITE SERVICES OF CA INC 185.13 AP - 00312664 7/20/2011 UPLAND ANIMAL HOSPITAL ~ 9,671.19 AP - 00312665 7/20/2011 UPS 44.91 AP - 00312665 7/20/2011 UPS 32.56 AP - 00312665 7/20/2011 UPS 29.02 AP - 00312666 7/20/2011 URBAN GRAFFITI ENTERPRISES INC 9,730.00 AP - 00312666 7/20/2011 URBAN GRAFFITI ENTERPRISES INC 2,254.00 AP - 00312667 7/20/2011 UTILIQUEST 941.80 AP - 00312668 7/20/201 I VAN DIJK & ASSOCIATES INC 1,225.00 AP - 00312668 7/20/2011 VAN DIJK & ASSOCIATES INC 700.00 AP - 00312669 7/20/2011 VAUGHN IRRIGATION SERVICES INC 1,068.81 AP - 00312669 7/20/2011 VAUGHN IRRIGATION SERVICES INC 325.00 AP - 00312669 7/20/2011 VAUGHN IRRIGATION SERVICES INC 125.00 AP - 00312669 7/20/2011 VAUGHN IRRIGATION SERVICES INC 33.75 AP - 00312669 7/20/2011 VAUGHN IRRIGATION SERVICES INC 1,770.45 AP - 00312669 7/20/2011 VAUGHN IRRIGATION SERVICES INC 91.25 AP - 00312670 7/20/2011 VERITEXT ORANGE COUNTY REPORTING CO 1,163.05 AP - 00312671 7/20/2011 VILLAGE NURSERIES WHOLESALE LLC 644.56 AP - 00312672 7/20/2011 VISTA PAINT 105.27 AP - 00312673 7/20/2011 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 272.75 AP - 00312673 7/20/2011 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 544.41 AP - 00312673 7/20/2011 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 187.23 AP - 00312673 7/20/2011 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 41.58 AP - 00312673 7/20/2011 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 187.23 AP - 00312673 7/20/2011 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 76:15 AP - 00312673 7/20/2011 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 28.22 AP - 00312674 7/20/2011 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 246.92 P37 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 30 Current Date: 07/27/201 Report: CK_AGENDA REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 09:25:2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P38 Agenda Check Register 7/13/2011 through 7/26/2011 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00312674 7/20/2011 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 1,328.62 AP - 00312674 7/20/2011 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 241.62 AP - 00312674 7/20/2011 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 290.71 AP - 00312674 7/20/2011 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 2,724.80 AP - 00312674 7/20/2-011 WAXISSANITARY SUPPLY 303.18 AP - 00312674 7/20/2011 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 99.47 AP - 00312675 7/20/2011 WEINSTEIN, DR MICHAEL P 1,600.00 AP - 00312676 7/20/2011 WESCO RECEIVABLES CORP ~ 380.63 AP - 00312678 7/20/2011 WEST END REAL ESTATE PROFESSIONALS 883.00 AP - 00312679 7/20/2011 WEST SANITATION SERVICES INC 328.50 AP - 00312680 7/20/2011 Al AUTOMOTIVE 94.49 AP - 00312680 7/20/2011 Al AUTOMOTIVE 63.01 AP - 00312680 7/20/2011 Al AUTOMOTIVE 70.34 AP - 00312681 7/20/2011 AA EQUIPMENT RENTALS CO INC 7478 AP - 00312682 7/20/2011 ACEY DECY EQUIPMENT INC. 425.39 AP - 00312683 7/20/2011 ACTION AWARDS INC. 1,326.78 AP - 00312684 7/20/2011 ACTIVE NETWORK, THE ~ 29,255.23 AP - 00312685 7/20/2011 ACTORS' EQUITY ASSOCIATION 1,660.23 AP - 00312686 7/20/2011 AGAPE EMPLOYMENT 341.00 AP - 00312686 7/20/201 I AGAPE EMPLOYMENT 25.58 AP - 00312686 7/20/201 I AGAPE EMPLOYMENT 682.00 AP - 00312686 7/20/2011 AGAPE EMPLOYMENT 579.70 AP - 00312686 7/20/2011 AGAPE EMPLOYMENT 12.79 AP - 00312689 7/20/2011 ALL WELDING 148.70 AP - 00312690 7/20/2011 ALLEGIANT BUSINESS FINANCE 643.68 AP - 00312691 7/20/2011 ANFINSON, STEVEN 700.00 AP - 00312692 7/20/2011 ARBOR NURSERY PLUS 545.22 AP - 00312692 7/20/2011 ARBOR NURSERY PLUS 672.36 AP - 00312693 7/20/2011 ASCE 60.00 AP - 00312694 7/20/2011 AUTO AND RV SPECIALISTS INC. 73.45 AP - 00312695 7/20/2011 AZTEC TECHNOLOGY CORP. 2,472.86 AP - 00312696 7/20/2011 BERTINO AUTOMOTIVE SERVICE 227.50 AP - 00312697 7/20/2011 BURGET, BENJAMIN M. 750.00 AP - 003 ] 2698 7/20/2011 BUTLER SCHEIN ANIMAL HEALTH SUPPLY 20.90 AP - 00312698 7/20/2011 BUTLER SCHEIN ANIMAL HEALTH SUPPLY 1,205.75 AP - 00312700 7/20/2011 CARDENAS, TAKAKO 750.00 AP - 00312702 7/20/201 I CASTILLO, SANDRA 250.00 AP - 003 ] 2703 7/20/2011 CHIPMAN DESIGN ARCHITECTURE 59.32 AP - 00312704 7/20/2011 CLASSE PARTY RENTALS 469.80 AP - 00312707 7/20/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1.00 AP - 00312708 7/20/2011 CYCLERY USA INC. 3,645.96 AP - 00312709 7/20/2011 DANESHVAR, HOMA 80.00 AP - 00312710 7/20/201 I DEALER ALTERNATIVE SOLUTIONS 123.43 AP - 00312711 7/20/2011 DELGADO, ALICIA 24.00 AP - 00312712 7/20/2011 DI PIETRO, TERESA K. 750.00 AP - 00312713 7/20/2011 DIAMOND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 212.59 AP - 00312713 7/20/2011 DIAMOND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 622.86 AP - 00312714 7/20/2011 DIERL, CHRIS 750.00 AP - 00312715 7/20/2011 DIKE, FAITH 5.00 AP - 00312716 7/20/2011 eCIVIS LLC 35,000.00 AP - 00312718 7/20/2011 EMPIRE MOBILE HOME SERVICE 9,895.75 AP - 00312719 7/20/2011 ESI ACQUISITIONS INC 9,000.00 AP - 00312721 7/20/2011 EXCLUSIVE EMAGES 8.00 AP - 00312723 7/20/201 I FCLO MUSIC THEATRE 4,615.00 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 31 Current Date: 07/27/201 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAI T_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 09:25:2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P39 Aeenda Check Resister 7/13/2011 through 7/26/20]1 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amoun[ AP - 00312725 7/20/2011 FLEET SERVICES INC. 104.99 AP - 00312726 7/20/201 I GARCIA, ALBERT D. 750.00 AP - 00312727 7/20/2011 GONZALEZ, MAGDA 250.00 AP - 00312728 7/20/2011 GRANITE HOMES 1,000.00 AP - 00312729 7/20/2011 GRAPHICS FACTORY PRINTING INC. 195.75 AP - 00312730 7/20/2011 HAMILTON, SANDRA 50.00 AP - 003 ] 2731 7/20/2011 HAMILTON, SHERRI 64.00 AP - 00312732 7/20/2011 HAN, DAEIL 80.00 AP - 00312733 7/20/2011 HARDEL, IRENE 125.00 AP - 00312734 7/20/2011 HDL SOFTWARE LLC. 1,560.60 AP - 00312734 7/20/201 ] HDL SOFTWARE LLC. 8,011.23 AP - 00312735 7/20/2011 HILLS PET NUTRITION SALES INC 316.67 AP - 00312736 7/20/2011 HOLT, TAMEIKA 92.00 AP - 00312737 7/20/2011 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 51.01 AP - 00312737 7/20/2011 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 34.52 AP - 00312738 7/20/2011 HOUSE OF RUTH 7,360.00 AP - 00312738 7/20/2011 HOUSE OF RUTH 10,515.00 AP - 00312740 7/20/2011 ICC FOOTHILL CHAPTER 50.00 AP - 00312741 7/20/201 ] INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY GROUP LLC 1,379.65 AP - 00312743 7/20/2011 IQBAL, BASHARAT 500.00 AP - 00312744 7/20/2011 J J KELLER AND ASSOC INC 845.00 AP - OC312745 7/20/2011 JDC INC 2,385.00 AP - 00312746 7/20/2011 JM SERVICES 3,950.00 AP - 00312747 7/20/2011 JOEL WARD PRODUCTIONS 760.00 AP - 00312748 7/20/2011 JONES, CHRISTINA HAATAINEN 724.00 AP - 00312749 7/20/2011 K HOVNANIAN COMPANIES ],394.46 AP - 00312749 7/20/2011 K HOVNANIAN COMPANIES 1,400.00 AP - 00312750 7/20/20] 1 K K WOODWORKING 59.81 AP - 00312750 7/20/2011 K K WOODWORKING 179.44 AP - 00312751 7/20/2011 KIM, JAE 20.00 AP - 00312753 7/20/2011 LAM, WENDY 50.00 AP - 00312754 7/20/2011 LEND, CHRISTINA 28.00 AP - 00312755 7/20/2011 LITTLE BEAR PRODUCTIONS 4,175.00 AP - 00312756 7/20/201 I MAIN STREET SIGNS 252.57 AP - 00312757 7/20/20] I MARTINEZ UNION SERVICE 45.00 AP - 00312757 7/20/201 ] MARTINEZ UNION SERVICE 45.00 AP - 00312757 7/20/2011 MARTINEZ UNION SERVICE 45.00 AP - 00312757 7/20/2011 MARTINEZ UNION SERVICE 45.00 AP - 003 ]2758 7/20/201 ] MCGRAW, JASMINE 45.00 AP - 00312759 7/20/2011 METROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT 1,351.48 AP - 00312760 7/20/2011 MIDWEST TAPE 12.99 AP - 00312760 7/20/2011 MIDWEST TAPE 144.96 AP - 00312760 7/20/201 I MIDWEST TAPE 114.97 AP - 00312761 7/20/2011 MIJAC ALARM COMPANY 1,350.00 AP - 00312762 7/20/201 I MILANES, YIKCIA 100.00 AP - 00312763 7/20/2011 MORNINGSTAR 740.00 AP - 00312764 7/20/2011 MOUNTAIN VIEW SMALL ENG REPAIR 26.03 AP - 00312765 7/20/201 ] MWI VETERINARY SUPPLY 89.44 AP - 00312765 7/20/2011 MWI VETERINARY SUPPLY 47.99 AP - 00312765 7/20/2011 MWI VETERINARY SUPPLY 22.01 AP - 00312765 7/20/2011 MWI VETERINARY SUPPLY 2,637.73 AP - 00312765 7/20/2011 MWI VETERINARY SUPPLY 102.34 AP - 00312766 7/20/2011 NAPA AUTO PARTS 13.58 AP - 00312766 7/20/2011 NAPA AUTO PARTS 10.25 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 32 Current Date: 07/27/201 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAI T_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 09:25:2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 7/13/2011 through 7/26/2011 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00312766 7/20/2011 NAPA AUTO PARTS 362.02 AP - 00312767 7/20/2011 NAPM-IE 180.00 AP - 00312768 7/20/2011 NATIONAL SAFETY COUNCIL 445.00 AP - 00312769 7/20/2011 NUMARA SOFTWARE INC 5,175.00 AP - 00312770 7/20/2011 O'LEARY, MAX 750.00 AP - 00312771 7/20/2011 OFFICE DEPOT 51.03 AP - 00312771 7/20/2011 OFFICE DEPOT 30.91 AP - 00312771 7/20/2011 OFFICE DEPOT 30.90 AP - 00312772 7/20/2011 ONA, LINDA 250.00 AP - 00312773 7/20/2011 ONTIVEROS, TOM 766.00 AP - 00312775 7/20/2011 PARSAC 147,145.00 AP - 00312775 7/20/2011 PARSAC 362,893.00 AP - 00312775 7/20/2011 PARSAC 3,323.00 AP - 00312775 7/20/2011 PARSAC 400,265.00 AP - 00312776 7/20/2011 PEREZ, DOMINICK 1,750.00 AP - 00312777 7/20/201 I PETES ROAD SERVICE INC 1,340.69 AP - 00312777 7/20/2011 PETES ROAD SERVICE INC 765.09 AP - 00312779 7/20/2011 PITNEY BOWES 25,000.00 AP-00312780 7/20/20,11 PMI 1,497.]0 AP - 00312782 7/20/2011 R & D PEST SERVICES INC 200.00 AP - 00312783 7/20/2011 RAINA, NEERU 22.00 AP - 00312784 7/20/2011 RBM LOCK AND KEY SERVICE 35.56 AP - 00312785 7/20/2011 RDO TRUST #80-5800 40.69 AP - 00312786 7/20/2011 ROBINSON, GERRY 50.00 . AP - 00312787 .7/20/2011 ROBLES, RAUL P 75.00 AP - 00312787 7/20/2011 ROBLES, RAUL P 75.00 AP - 00312787 7/20/2011 ROBLES, RAUL P 75.00 AP - 00312787 7/20/2011 ROBLES, RAUL P 105.00 AP - 00312787 7/20/2011 ROBLES, RAUL P 75.00 AP - 00312788 7/20/2011 RODRIGUEZ INC, R Y 976.10. AP - 00312790 7/20/2011 SECURITY SOLUTIONS INTERNATIONAL 4,559.00 AP - 00312791 7/20/2011 SHORT LOAD CONCRETE 398.88 AP - 00312793 7/20/2011 SOLARMAX TECHNOLOGY INC 68,130.26 AP - 00312794 7/20/2011 SOUTHLAND SPORTS OFFICIALS 414.00 AP - 00312795 7/20/2011 STERICYCLE INC 881.99 AP - 00312796. 7/20/2011 SUSANTI, DEWI 130.00 AP - 00312798 7/20/2011 TRAK ENGINEERING INC 1,140.32 AP - 00312800 7/20/2011 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 684.59 AP - 00312800 7/20/2011 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 25.85 AP - 00312800 7/20/2011 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 44.00 AP - 00312800 7/20/2011 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 119.35 AP - 00312801 7/20/2011 UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA TRUSTEE FOR P, 253.89 AP - 00312801 7/20/2011 UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA TRUSTEE FOR P, 2,920.16 AP - 00312802 7/20/2011 UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA TRUSTEE FOR P. 48,728.91 AP - 00312803 7/20/2011 UNISOURCE WORLDWIDE INC 582.13 AP - 00312804 7/20/2011 UNITED SCENIC ARTISTS PENSION & WELFARI 369.24 AP - 00312805 7/20/2011 UPS 4777 AP - 00312806 7/20/2011 US POSTMASTER 9,000.00 AP - 00312807 7/20/2011 VAN ABEL, CATALINA 40.00 AP - 00312808 7/20/2011 VANEK, AARON 250.00 AP - 00312809 7/20/2011 VARVI, DEBRA 200.00 AP - 00312810 7/20/2011 VARVI, DEBRA 200.00 AP - 00312811 7/20/201 I , VAUGHN, BRAD W 750.00 AP - 00312814 7/20/2011 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 87.77 P40 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 33 Current Date: 07/27/201 Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC -. CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layou[ Time: 09:25:2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 7/13/2011 through 7/26/2011 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00312814 7/20/2011 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 475.03 AP - 00312814 7/20/2011 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 76.13 AP - 00312814 7/20/2011 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 38.07 AP - 00312814 7/20/2011 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 41.96 AP - 00312814 7/20/201 I VERIZON CALIFORNIA 38.06 AP - 00312814 7/20/2011 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 40.29 AP - 00312814 7/20/2011 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 141.83 AP - 00312814 7/20/2011 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 18.07 AP - 00312814 7/20/2011 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 36.90 AP - 00312814 7/20/2011 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 109.04 AP - 00312814 7/20/2011 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 36.89 AP - 00312814 7/20/2011 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 94.66 AP - 00312814 7/20/2011 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 38.06 AP - 003128 ]4 7/20/201 I VERIZON CALIFORNIA 36.90 AP - 00312814 7/20/2011 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 19.86 AP - 00312814 7/20/2011 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 18.03 AP - 00312814 7/20/2011 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 38.42 AP - 00312814 7/20/2011 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 23.42 AP - 00312814 7/20/2011 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 37.93 AP - 00312814 7/20/2011 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 73.82 AP - 00312814 7/20/2011 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 36.89 AP - 00312814 7/20/2011 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 658.12 AP - 00312814 7/20/2011 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 167.96 AP - 00312814 7/20/201 I VERIZON CALIFORNIA ] 67.39 AP - 003128 ] 4 7/20/2011 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 36.89 AP - 00312814 7/20/2011 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 147.62 AP - 00312814 7/20/2011 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 36.90 AP - 00312814 7/20/2011 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 48.57 AP - 00312814 7/20/2011 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 48.57 AP -00312814 7/20/2011 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 87.49 AP - 00312814 7/20/201 I VERIZON CALIFORNIA 364.18 AP - 00312814 7/20/2011 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 36.89 AP - 00312814 7/20/2011 VSRIZON CALIFORNIA 423.67 AP - 00312814 7/20/2011 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 19.86 AP - 00312814 7/20/2011 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 38.06 AP - 00312814 7/20/2011 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 38.06 AP - 00312814 7/20/2011 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 76.86 AP - 00312814 7/20/2011 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 169.98 AP - 00312814 7/20/2011 VERIZON CALIFORNIA ~ 45.38 AP - 00312814 7/20/2011 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 49.87 AP - 00312814 7/20/2011 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 78.86 AP - 003 ] 2814 7/20/201 I VERIZON CALIFORNIA 20.18 AP - 00312814 7/20/2011 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 38.67 AP - 00312814 7/20/2011 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 54.65 AP - 00312814 7/20/2011 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 74.57 AP - 00312814 7/20/2011 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 38.06 AP - 00312814 7/20/2011 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 185.25 AP - 00312814 7/20/201 I VERIZON CALIFORNIA 40.72 AP - 00312814 7/20/2011 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 40.29 AP - 00312814 7/20/2011 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 29.06 AP - 00312814 7/20/2011 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 38.06 AP - 00312814 7/20/2011 VERIZON CALIFORNIA ~ 38.07 AP - 00312814 7/20/2011 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 38.06 AP - 00312814 7/20/2011 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 38.06 P41 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 34 Current Date: 07/27/201 Report: CK_AGENDA REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 09:25:2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA A;;enda Check ReEister 7/13/2011 through 7/26/2011 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name ~ Amoun[ AP - 00312814 7/20/2011 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 18.58 AP - 00312814 7/20/2011 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 3,150.45 AP - 00312814 7/20/2011 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 38.94 AP - 00312814 7/20/2011 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 46.21 AP - 00312814 7/20/2011 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 78.19 AP - 00312814 7/20/2011 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 18.54 AP - 00312814 7/20/2011 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 18.03 AP - 003128]4 7/20/2011 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 1,550.75 AP - 00312814 7/20/2011 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 38.07 AP - 00312814 7/20/2011 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 38.67 AP - 00312814 7/20/2011 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 661.14 AP - 00312814 7/20/2011 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 38.89 AP - 00312814 7/20/2011 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 18.07 AP - 00312814 7/20/2011 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 18.07 AP - 00312814 7/20/2011 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 144.49 AP - 00312814 7/20/2011 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 40.89 AP - 00312814 7/20/2011 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 36.90 AP - 00312814 7/20/20] 1 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 185.84 AP - 00312814 7/20/2011 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 18.54 AP - 00312814 7/20/2011 VERIZON CALIFORNIA- 36.90 AP - 00312815 7/20/2011 Verizon 31.99 AP - 00312816 7/20/2011 WALTERS, LISA 2,000.00 AP - 00312819 7/20/201 ] WILSON AND BELL 283.08 AP - 00312819 7/20/2011 WILSON AND BELL 291.25 AP - 00312820 7/20/2011 YANKEE, AL 750.00 AP - 00312822 7/21/201 I CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 296.61 AP - 00312822 7/21/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 710.50 AP - 00312822 .7/21/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 566.92 AP - 00312822 7/21/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 3,271.67 AP - 00312822 7/21/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,099.77 AP - 00312822 7/21/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 576.25 AP - 00312822 7/21/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 276.73 AP - 00312822 7/21/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 344.57 AP - 00312822 7/21/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 153.94 AP - 00312822 7/21/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 70.77 AP - 00312822 7/21/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 211.33 AP - 00312822 7/21/201 I CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 250.53 AP - 00312822 7/21/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 3,853.55 AP - 00312822 7/21/20] 1 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 146.55 AP - 003]2822 7/21/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 123.82 AP - 00312823 7/2]/2011 DAPPER TIRE CO 706.91 AP - 00312824 7/21/2011 DEKRA-CITE INDUSTRIES INC 4,748.94 AP - 00312825 7/21/2011 EMCOR SERVICE 6,428.78 AP - 00312825 7/21/2011 EMCOR SERVICE 17,186.62 AP - 00312826 7/21/2011 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 14.64 AP - 00312827 7/21/2011 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 430.38 AP - 00312827 7/21/2011 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 50.00 AP - 00312827 7/21/2011 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 861.33 AP - 00312827 7/21 /2011 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 61.44 AP - 00312827 7/21/2011 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 61.44 AP - 00312827 7/21/20] 1 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 61.44 AP - 00312827 7/21/2011 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 56.01 AP - 00312829 7/21/201 I KONICA MINOLTA BUSINESS SOLUTIONS USA 6,081.99 AP - 00312829 7/21/2011 KONICA MINOLTA BUSINESS SOLUTIONS USA 40.26 P42 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 35 Current Date: 07/27/201 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 09:25:2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 7/13/2011 through 7/26/2011 Check No. Check Dale Vendor Name ~ Amount AP - 00312829 7/21/2011 KONICA MINOLTA BUSINESS SOLUTIONS USA 6,222.64 AP - 00312829 7/21/2011 KONICA MINOLTA BUSINESS SOLUTIONS USA 1,555.00 AP - 00312831 7/21/2011 SUNRISE FORD 48.72 AP - 00312831 7/21/2011 SUNRISE FORD 168.87 AP - 00312832 7/21/2011 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 1,065.44 AP - 00312832 7/21/2011 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 3,194.14 AP - 00312832 7/21/2011 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 450.00 AP - 00312832 7/21/2011 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 408.00 AP - 00312832 7/21/2011 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 187.50 AP - 00312832 7/21/2011 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 2,556.32 AP - 00312832 7/21/2011 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 14,406.68 AP - 00312832 7/21/2011 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 401.25 AP - 00312832 7/21/2011 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 20,018.54 AP - 00312832 7/21/2011 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 4,569.60 AP - 00312832 7/21/2011 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 6,803.68 AP - 00312832 7/21/201 I TRUGREEN LANDCARE 448.50 AP - 00312832' 7/21/2011 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 84.75 AP - 00312832 7/21/2011 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 470.06 AP - 00312832 7/21/2011 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 1,043.93 AP - 00312833 7/21/201 I ABC LOCKSMITHS 271.97 AP - 00312833 7/21/2011 ABC LOCKSMITHS 19.40 AP - 00312833 7/21/2011 ABC LOCKSMITHS 210.65 AP - 00312836 7/21/2011 INTERSTATE BATTERIES 30.17 AP - 00312836 7/21/2011 INTERSTATE BATTERIES 64.47 Total for Check ID AP: 3,394,218.13 EP - 00001902 7/13/2011 FORTISTAR METHANE GROUP LLC 110,811.63 EP - 00001902 7/13/2011 FORTISTAR METHANE GROUP LLC 96,162.76 EP - 00001903 7/13/2011 SEMPRA GENERATION 1,500.00 EP - 00001904 7/13/2011 VERNON LIGHT & POWER, CITY OF 255,584.00 EP - 00001907 7/13/2011 CALIF GOVERNMENT VEBA/RANCHO CUCAMC 1,100.00 EP - 00001907 7/13/2011 CALIF GOVERNMENT VEBA/RANCHO CUCAMC 7,000.00 EP - 00001908 7/13/201 I RIVERSIDE, CITY OF 5,807.00 EP - 00001909 7/20/201 I CHAFFEY JOINT UNION HS DISTRICT 201.24 EP - 00001909 7/20/2011 CHAFFEY JOINT UNION HS DISTRICT 344.76 EP - 00001910 7/20/2011 VIASYN INC 3,091.00 Total for Check ID EP: 481,602.39 Total for Entity: 3,875,820.52 P43 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 36 Current Date: 07/27/201 Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 09:25:2 t STAFF REPORT - ENGINEERING SERVICES DEP.'.RTMENT RANCHO Date: August 3, 2011 CUCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager From: Mark A. Steuer, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer By: Romeo M. David, Associate Engineer Subject: APPROVAL TO AUTHORIZE THE ADVERTISING OF THE "NOTICE INVITING BIDS" FOR THE FY 2011/12 LOCAL STREET PAVEMENT REHABILITATION -OVERLAY OF VARIOUS STREETS, TO BE FUNDED FROM GAS TAX RT 7360, ACCOUNT NO. 11743035650/1022174-0 FOR CONSTRUCTION OF SAID PROJECT RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council approve specifications for the construction of FY 2011/12 Local Street Pavement Rehabilitation -Overlay of Various Streets and approve the attached resolution authorizing the City Clerk to advertise the "Notice Inviting Bids", to be funded from Gas Tax RT 7360, Account No. 11743035650/1022174-0 for construction of said project. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The scope of work for FY 2011/12 Local Street Pavement Rehabilitation -Overlay for various local streets cohsists of, but not limited to cold milling, adjusting existing manholes and valves to new grade, removal and replacement of severed cracks, pavement overlay, traffic loops replacement and striping. The project will be funded from Gas Tax RT 7360, Account No. 11743035650/1022174-0. Staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt per Article 19, Section 15301(c) of the CEQA guidelines. The Engineer's estimate is $800,000. Legal advertising is scheduled for August 9, 2011 and August 16, 2011, with bid opening at 2:00 p.m. on Tuesday, August 23, 2011, unless extended by addendum. Respectfully submitted, M -~~ Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer MAS/RM D:Is P44 Attachment ~~ .e w. `~~ ii a ~,'I all VICINITY MAP .®..~.. ~ i! '~' MAP-1 I~ i - Cly~ it ABC a l~ li ~I_ ~~. _.._.~~-------_~~ B ~~ ~,~, 0'.. ~~ . rc ~ d 9 W~MLIP-~ ~ BANYAN ST. J J t~ Q ST. ~j HIGHUAND AVE. ~_ ~ %~ r" ~ L_1L_~~ ~~ ~~ VICTORIA ni ih ST.~ ~ ¢ VICTORIA C~ VINDRDVS PARK a -~~ ~ ----r_,."~;._,_ VICTGRIA l_.v PARK LN ~• W ~~ =MAP-4 =~ ~ J ~ I~ II SP RR :LINE AV I~ I _ BASE LINE l_ RGAD ~~ ` ~I r-~ _ ii M i y _ __ ~l __~F~P i WTI W W ~ V J \II iii li_ _. l _ .i ~:: ~.' ~ ' ~~~ a J O ____ _ _ _ __ __ ~I I ~ If HURCH~ L I _ VIL _ __ L W W ~~ p~ I a ARROV A T 6 S F R R CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ~;~ .~~ FY 2011/2012 LOCAL STREET PAVEMENT REHABILITATION N ~' OVERLAY OF VARIOUS STREETS PARKS N.T.S. ' n P46 RESOLUTION NO. )1-1.31 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE FY 2011/12 LOCAL STREET PAVEMENT REHABILITATION -. OVERLAY OF VARIOUS STREETS, IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS WHEREAS, it is the intention of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to construct certain improvements in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. W HEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga has prepared specifcations for the construction of certain improvements. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the specifcations presented by the City of Rancho Cucamonga be and are hereby approved as the plans and specifications for the "FY 2011/12 LOCAL STREET PAVEMENT REHABILITATION - OVERLAY OF VARIOUS STREETS": BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to advertise as required bylaw for the receipt of sealed bids or proposals for doing the work specified in the aforesaid plans and specifications, which said advertisement shall be substantially in the following words and figures, to wit: "NOTICE INVITING SEALED BIDS OR PROPOSALS" Pursuant to a Resolutioh of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County,. California, directing this notice, NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that said City of Rancho Cucamonga will receive at the Office of the City Clerk in the offices of the City df Rancho Cucamonga, on or before the hour of 2:00 p.m. on Tuesday, August 23, 2011, sealed bids or proposals for the "FY 2011/12 LOCAL STREET PAVEMENT REHABILITATION - OVERLAY OF VARIOUS STREETS" in said City. Bids will be publicly opened and read in the office of the City Clerk, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. Bids must be made on a form provided for the purpose, addressed to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, marked, "FY 2011/12 LOCAL STREET PAVEMENT REHABILITATION- OVERLAY OF VARIOUS STREETS": PREVAILING WAGE: Notice is hereby given that in accordance with the provisions of California Labor Code, Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Articles 1 and 2, the Contractor is required to pay not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for work of a similar character in the locality in which the public work is performed, and not less than the general prevailing rate of perdiem wages for holiday and overtime work. In that regard, the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations of the State of California is required to and has determined such general prevailing rates of perdiem wages. Copies of such prevailing rates of per diem wages are on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California, and are available to any interested party on request. The Contracting Agency also shall cause a copy of such determinations to be posted at the job site. P47 RESOLUTION NO. August 3, 2011 Page 2 Pursuant to provisions of Labor Code Section 1775, the Contractor shall forfeit, as penalty td the City of Rancho Cucamonga, not more than fifty dollars ($50.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed for each calendar day or portion thereof, if such laborer, workman or mechanic is paid less than the general prevailing rate of wages herein before stipulated for any work done under the attached contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions of said Labor Code. Attention is directed to the provisions in Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 of the Labor Code concerning the employment of apprentices by the Contractor or any subcontractor under him. Section 1777.5, as amended, requires the Contractor or subcontractor employing tradesmen in any apprenticable occupation to apply to the joint apprenticeship committee nearest the site of the public work's project and which administers the apprenticeship program in thattradefora certificate of approval. The certifcate will also fix the ratio of apprentices to journeymen that will be used in the performance of the contract. The ratio of apprentices to journeymen in such cases shall not be less than one to five except: A. When unemployment in the area of coverage by the joint apprenticeship committee has exceeded an average of 15 percent in the 90 days prior to the request of certificate, or B. When the number of apprentices in training in the area exceeds a ratio of one to five, or C. When the trade can show that it is replacing at least 1/30 of its membership through apprenticeship training on an annual basis statewide or locally, or D. When the Contractor provides evidence that he employs registered apprentices on all of his contracts on an annual average of not less than one apprentice to eight journeymen. The Contractor is required to make contributions to funds established for the administration of apprenticeship programs if he employs registered apprentices orjourneymen in any apprenticable trade on such contracts and if other Contractors on the public works site are making such contributions. The Contractor and subcontractor under him shall comply with the requirements of Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 in the employment of apprentices. Information relative to apprenticeship standards, wage schedules, and other requirements maybe obtained from the Director of Industrial Relations, ex-officio the Administratorof Apprenticeship, San Francisco, California, or from the Division of Apprenticeship Standards and its branch offices. Eight (8) hours of labor shall constitute a legal day's work forall workmen employed in the execution of this contract and the Contractor and any subcontractor under him shall comply with and be governed by the laws of the State of California having to do with working hours as set forth in Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Article 3 of the Labor Code of the State of California as amended. P48 RESOLUTION NO. August 3, 2011 Page 3 The Contractor shall forfeit, as a penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, twenty-five dollars 025.00) for each laborer,.workman, or mechanic employed in the execution of the contract, by him or any subcontractor urider him, upon any of the work herein before mentioned, for each calendar day during which said laborer, workman, or mechanic is required or permitted to labor more than eight (8) hours in violation of said Labor Code. Contractor agrees to pay travel and subsistence pay to each workman needed to execute the work required by this contract as such travel and subsistence payments are defined in the applicable collective bargaining agreement filed in accordance with Labor Code Section 17773.8. The bidder must submit with his proposal, cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bidder's bond, payable to the City of Rancho Cucamonga for an amount equal to at least 10% of the amount of said bid as a guarantee that the bidder will enter into the proposed contract if the same is awarded ' to him, and in event of failure to enter into such contract said cash, cashiers' check, certified check, or bond shall become the property of the City of Rancho Cucampnga. If the City of Rancho Cucamonga awards the contract to the next lowest bidder, the amount of the lowest bidder's security shall be applied by the City of Rancho Cucamonga to the difference between the low bid and the second lowest bid, and the surplus, if any shall be returhed to the lowest bidder. The amount of the bond to be given to secure a faithful performance of the contract for said work shall be 100% of the contract price thereof, and an additional bond in an amount equal to 100% of the contract price for said work'shall be given to secure the payment of claims for any materials or supplies furnished for the performance of the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, or any work or labor of any kind done thereon, and the Contractor will also be required to furnish a certificate that he carries compensation insurance covering his employees upon work to be done under contract which may be entered into between him and the said City of Rancho Cucamonga for the construction of said work. Contractor shall possess any and all contractor licenses, in form and class as required by any and all applicable laws with respect to any and all of the work to be performed under this contract; Including but not limited to a Class "A" License (General Engineering Contractor) or "C12" License in accordance with the provisions of the Contractor's License Law (California Business and Professions Code, Section 7000 et. seq.) and rules and regulation adopted pursuant thereto. The Contractor, pursuant to the "California Business and Professions Code," Section 7028.15, shall indicate his or her State License Number on the bid, together with the expiration date, and be signed by the Contractor declaring, under penalty of perjury, that the information being provided is true and correct. The work is to be done in accordance with the profiles, plans, and specifications of the City of Rancho Cucamonga on file in the Office of the City Clerk at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. In an effort to go green and paperless, digital copies of the plans, specifications, and bid proposal, including any future addenda or revisions to the bid documents, are available by going to P49 RESOLUTION NO. August 3, 2011 Page 4 www.ciplist.comsnd signing up, by going to Member Login or Member Signup (its free), then choose California, then scroll down to San Bernardino County and click on Browse Cities, then scroll down to Rancho Cucamonga and click on City Projects, then click on the Project of interest underthe Title and follow directions for download. Note, copies of the plans, specifications, bid proposal, addendums and revisions will not be provided, digital copies must be downloaded from the above website then printed. Prospective bidders must register for an account on www.ciplist.com to be included on the prospective bidder's list(s) and to receive email updates of any addenda or revisions to the bid documents. Be advised that the information contained on this site may change over time and without notice to prospective bidders or .registered users. While effort is made to keep information current and accurate and to notify registered prospective bidders of any changes to the bid documents, it is the responsibility of each prospective bidderto registerwith www.ciplist.comsnd to check this website on a DAILY basis through the close of bids for any applicable addenda or updates. No proposal will be considered from a Contractor to whom a proposal form has not been issued by the City of Rancho Cucamonga to registered prospective bidders from www.ciplist.com. The successful bidder will be required to enter into a contract satisfactory to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. In accordance with the requirements of Section 9-3.2 of the General Provisions, asset forth in the Plans and Specifications regarding the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, the Contractor may, upon the Contractor's request and at the Contractor's sole cost and expense, substitute authorized securities in lieu of monies withheld (performance retention). The City of Rancho Cucamonga, reserves the right to reject any or all bids. Questions regarding this Notice Inviting Bids for "FY 2011/12 LOCAL STREET PAVEMENT REHABILITATION - OVERLAY OF VARIOUS STREETS" may be directed to: ROMEO M. DAVID, ASSOCIATE ENGINEER & PROJECT MANAGER 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909) 477-2740, ext. 4070 ADVERTISE ON: August 9, 2011 and August 16, 2011 STAFF REPORT ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT Date: August 3, 2011 To: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager From: Mark A. Steuer, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer By: Romeo M. David, Associate Engineer RANCHO C,UCAMONGA Subject: APPROVAL TO AUTHORIZE THE ADVERTISING OF THE "NOTICE INVITING BIDS" FOR THE FY 2011/12 LOCAL STREET PAVEMENT REHABILITATION -SLURRY SEAL OF VARIOUS STREETS, TO BE FUNDED FROM GAS TAX RT 7360, ACCOUNT NO. 11743035650/1022174-0 FOR CONSTRUCTION OF SAID PROJECT RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council approve specifications for the construction of FY 2011/12 Local.Street Pavement Rehabilitation -Slurry Seal of Various Streets and approve the attached resolution authorizing the City Clerk to advertise the "Notice Inviting Bids" to be funded from Gas Tax RT 7360 account no. 11743035650/1022174-0 for construction of said project: BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The scope of work for FY 2011/12 Local Street Pavement Rehabilitation -Slurry Seal for various local streets consists of, but not limited to weed killing and removal, crack sealing, slurry sealing and striping. The project will be funded from Gas Tax RT 7360 account no. 11743035650/1022174- 0. Staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt per Article 19, Section 15301(c) of the CEQA guidelines. The Engineer's estimate is $350,000. Legal advertising is scheduled for August 9 and August 16, 2011 with bid opening at 2:00 p.m. on Tuesday August 23, 2011, unless extended by addendum. Respectfully submitted, ar e~~`'` Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer MAS/RMD:Is P50 Attachment 0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FY 2011/2012 LOCAL STREET PAVE1~ldT REHABUITATION (SLURRY SEAL) AT VARiOIIS LOCATIONS N N.T.S. n P52 RESOLUTION NO. ~~- I.3Z A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE FY 2011/12 LOCAL STREET PAVEMENT REHABILITATION -SLURRY SEAL OF VARIOUS STREETS, IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS WHEREAS, it is the intention of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to construct certain improvements in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga has prepared specifications for the construction of certain improvements. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the specifications presented by the City of Rancho- Cucamonga be and are hereby approved as the plans and specifications for the "FY 2011/12 LOCAL STREET PAVEMENT REHABILITATION -SLURRY SEAL OF VARIOUS STREETS": BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby authbrized and directed to advertise as required bylaw for the receipt of sealed bids or proposals for doing the work specified in the aforesaid plans and specifications, which said advertisement shall be substantially in the. following words and figures, to wit: "NOTICE INVITING SEALED BIDS OR PROPOSALS" Pursuant to a Resolution of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County, California, directing this notice, NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that said City of Rancho Cucamonga will receive at the Office of the City Clerk in the offices of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, on or before the hour of 2:00 p.m. on Tuesday, August 23, 2011, sealed bids or proposals for the "FY 2011/12 LOCAL STREET PAVEMENT REHABILITATION -SLURRY SEAL OF VARIOUS STREETS" in said City. Bids will be publicly opened and read in the office of the City Clerk, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. Bids must be made on a form provided for the purpose, addressed to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, marked, "FY 2011/12 LOCAL STREET PAVEMENT REHABILITATION - SLURRY SEAL OF VARIOUS STREETS": PREVAILING WAGE: Notice is hereby given that in accordance with the provisions of California Labor Code, Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Articles 1 and 2, the Contractor is required to pay not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for work of a similar character in the locality in which the public work is performed, and not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for holiday and overtime work. In that regard, the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations of the State of Califomia is required to and has determined such general prevailing rates of per diem wages. Copies of such prevailing rates of per diem wages are on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, Califomia, and are available to any interested party on request. The Contracting Agency also shall cause a copy of P53 RESOLUTION NO. August 3, 2011 Page 2 such determinations to be posted at the job site. Pursuant to provisions of Labor Code Section 1775, the Contractor shall forfeit, as penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, not more than fifty dollars ($50.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed for each calendar day or portion thereof, if such laborer, workman or mechanic is paid less than the general prevailing rate of wages herein before stipulated for any work done under the attached contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions of said Labor Code. Attention is directed to the provisions in Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 of the Labor Code concerning the employment of apprentices by the Contractor or any subcontractor under him. Section 1777.5, as amended, requires the Contractor or subcontractor employing tradesmen in any apprenticable occupation to apply to the joint apprenticeship committee nearest the site of the public work's project and which administers the apprenticeship program in that trade fora certificate of approval. The certificate will also fix the ratio of apprentices to journeymen that will be used in the performance of the contract. The ratio of apprentices to journeymen in such cases shall not be less than one to five except: A. When unemployment in the area of coverage by the joint apprenticeship committee has exceeded an average of 15 percent in the 90 days prior to the request of certificate. or B. When the number of apprentices in training in the area exceeds a ratio of one to five, or C. When the trade can show that it is replacing at least 1/30 of its membership through apprenticeship training on an annual basis statewide or locally, or D. When the Contractor provides evidence that he employs registered apprentices on all of his contracts on an annual average of not less than one apprentice to eight journeymen. The Contractor is required to make contributions to funds established for the administration of apprenticeship programs if he employs registered apprentices orjourneymen in any apprenticable trade on such contracts and if other Contractors on the public works site are making such contributions. The Contractor and subcontractor under him shall comply with the requirements of Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 in the employment of apprentices. Information relative to apprenticeship standards, wage schedules, and other requirements maybe obtained from the Director of Industrial Relations, ex-officio the Administrator ofApprenticeship, San Francisco, California, or from the Division of Apprenticeship Standards and its branch offices. Eight (8) hours of labor shall constitute a legal day's work for all workmen employed in the execution of this contract and the Contractor and any subcontractor under him shall comply with and be P54 RESOLUTION NO. August 3, 2011 Page 3 governed by the laws of the State of California having to do with working hours as set forth in Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Article 3 of the Labor Code of the State of California as amended. The Contractor shall forfeit, as a penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, twenty-five dollars ($25.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed in the execution of the contract, by him or any subcontractor under him, upon any of the work herein before mentioned, for each calendar day during which said laborer, workman, or mechanic is required or permitted to labor more than eight (8) hours in violation of said Labor Code. Contractor agrees to pay travel and subsistence pay to each workman needed to execute the work required by this contract as such travel and subsistence payments are defined in the applicable collective bargaining agreement filed in accordance with Labor Code Section 17773.8. The bidder must submit with his proposal, dash, cashier's check, certified check, or bidder's bond, payable to the City of Rancho Cucamonga for an amount equal to at least 10% of the amount of said bid as a guarantee that the bidder will enter into the proposed contract if the same is awarded to him, and in event of failure to enter into such contract said cash, cashiers' check, certified check, or bond shall become the property of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. If the City of Rancho Cucamonga awards the contract to the next lowest bidder, the amount of the lowest bidder's security shall be applied by the City of Rancho Cucamonga to the difference between the low bid and the second lowest bid, and the surplus, if any shall be returned to the lowest bidder. The amount of the bond to be given to secure a faithful performance of the contract for said work shall be 100% of the contract price thereof, and an additional bond in an amount equal to 100% of the contract price for said work shall be given to secure the payment of claims for any materials or supplies furnished for the performance of the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, or any work or labor of any kind done thereon, and the Contractor will also be required to furnish a certificate that he carries compensation insurance covering his employees upon work to be done under contract which may be entered into between him and the said City of Rancho Cucamonga for the construction of said work. Contractor shall possess any and all contractor licenses, inform and class as required by any and all applicable laws with respect to any and all of the work to be performed under this contract; Including but not limited to a Class "A" License (General Engineering Contractor) or "C12" License in accordance with the provisions of the Contractor's License Law (California Business and Professions Code, Section 7000 et. seq.) and rules and regulation adopted pursuant thereto. The Contractor, pursuant to the "California Business and Professions Code," Section 7028.15, shall indicate his or her State License Number on the bid, togetherwith the expiration date, and be signed by the Contractor declaring, under penalty of perjury, that the information being provided is true and correct. The work is to be done in accordance with the profiles, plans, and specifications of the City of Rancho Cucamonga on file in the Office of the City Clerk at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga,- California. P55 RESOLUTION NO. August 3, 2011 Page 4 In an effort to go green and paperless, digital copies of the plans, specifications, and bid proposal, including any future addenda or revisions to the bid documents, are available by going to www.ciplist.comsnd signing up, by going to Member Login or MemberSignup (its free), then choose California, then scroll down to San Bernardino County and click on Browse Cities, then scroll down to Rancho Cucamonga and click on City Projects, then click on the Project of interest underthe Title and follow directions for download. Note, copies of the plans, specifications, bid proposal, addendums and revisions will not be provided, digital copies must be downloaded from the above website then printed. Prospective bidders must register for an account on www.ciplist.com to be included on the prospective bidder's list(s) and to receive email updates of any addenda or revisions to the bid documents. Be advised that the information contained on this site may change over time and without notice to prospective bidders or registered users. While effort is made to keep information current and accurate and to notify registered prospective bidders of any changes to the bid documents, it is the responsibility of each prospective bidderto registerwith www.ciplist.comsnd to check this website on a DAILY basis through the close of bids for any applicable addenda or updates. No proposal will be considered from a Contractor to whom a proposal form has not been issued by the City of Rancho Cucamonga to registered prospective bidders from www.ciplist.com. The successful bidder will be required to enter into a contract satisfactory to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. In accordance with the requirements of Section 9-3.2 of the General Provisions, as set forth in the Plans and Specifications regarding the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, the Contractor may, upon.the Contractor's request and at the Contractor's sole cost and expense, substitute authorized securities in lieu of monies withheld (performance retention). The City of Rancho Cucamonga, reserves the right to reject any or all bids. Questions regarding this Notice Inviting Bids for "FY 2011/12 LOCAL STREET PAVEMENT REHABILITATION -SLURRY SEAL OF VARIOUS STREETS" may be directed to: ROMEO M. DAVID, ASSOCIATE ENGINEER & PROJECT MANAGER 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909) 477-2740, ext. 4070 ADVERTISE ON: August 9, 2011 and August 16, 2011 STAFF REPORT COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT Date: To: From: By: Subject: August 3, 2011 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager RANCHO ~UCAMONGA Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director Dave Moore, Community Services Superintendent~~ APPROVAL OF AN AMENDED AND RESTATED JOINT USE AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND THE CHAFFEY JOINT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT RELATING TO COMMUNITY SERVICES ACTIVITIES RECOMMENDATION: Staff is recommending that the City Council approve the attached amended and restated joint use agreement between the City and the Chaffey Joint Union High School District. BACKGROUND: In 2002, the City of Rancho Cucamonga and Chaffey Joint Union High School District entered into a joint use agreement concerning district owned and operated facilities to be scheduled by the City for recreation purposes and community use. This agreement was written by District attorneys and established the terms, conditions and responsibilities of each of the parties and specified the facilities available for City sponsored activities and Rancho Cucamonga based non-profit youth sports groups. This agreement resulted in a much greater guarantee and priority for the youth sports groups' use of high school sports fields and the City's use of high school gyms, pools, dance rooms and class rooms for City sponsored activities. Since then, several changes have occurred and an amended agreement was needed to address these changes. Both City and District staff have collaborated to amend and restate the language of the agreement while still keeping most of the agreement in its original language. This new amended version doesn't change the use of the facilities or the City's annual contribution to the District but does include these other necessary revisions: a) language changes to clarify current practices for the City's use of high school facilities for City sponsored activities; b) clarification of the field allocation process and priority concerning non-profit youth sports groups based in Rancho Cucamonga; c) new start and end dates of the new school year; d) new sports field lighting at Los Osos High School paid for by the City and clarification of maintenance responsibilities; and d) updated language changes. in the insurance indemnification section of the agreement. The Chaffey Joint Union. High School District Board did approve to amend and restate this joint use P56 P57 APPROVAL OF AN AMENDED AND RESTATED JOINT USE AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN THE QTY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND THE Q-IAFT'EY JOINT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT RELATING TO COMMUNITY SERVICES ACIIVITIES. AUGUST 3, 2011 agreement on July 12, 2011 and staff is requesting that the City Council also approve this amended and restated joint use agreement. fitted, Kevin I~1cArdle Community Services Director Attachment: Amended and Restated Joint Us Agreement by and Between the Chaffey Joint Union High School District and the City of Rancho Cucamonga L\COMMSER\ACouncil&Boards\CiryCouncil\StaffReports\20110\ChaffeyJUHSDJointUseAgreement8.3.11 .doc P58 AMENDED AND RESTATED JOINT USE AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN THE CHAFFEY JOINT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT AND THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ("AGREEMENT") This Agreement (Agreement") was originally, is entered into and becanie effective on the 6`h day of November, 2002 ("Effective Date") by and between the Chaffey Joint Union High School District ("District") and the City of Rancho Cucamonga ("City."). The Agreement is amended and restated as set forth herein, on the 4`h day of August, 2011, and the City and district intend that all provisions of the Agreement shall continue in full force and effect, except as modified herein. Section 1: Intent of the Parties. District owns and operates several facilities that aze or can be utilized for recreation purposes. City desires to obtain the right to utilize the District's facilities for its residents' recreation activities at no cost or burden to District. City and District believe the joint use of the District facilities will be beneficial to both entities and will maximize the recreational opportunities available to the constituents within each entity's jurisdiction. This Agreement is intended to establish the terms, conditions and promises by which City and District will provide for the long-term use of the facilities for recreation purposes. City and District each jointly and sepazately agree and acknowledge that the bargained for promises, duties and covenants of the other aze valuable consideration that each is relying upon and absent this consideration neither would have entered into this Agreement. Section 2: Real Property Subiect to this Agreement. The District intends City to be able to jointly use only the District's high schools, present and future which aze located within City, for joint use. The specific list of high schools and sites that aze regulated by this Agreement (in whole or part "Facilities") are set forth on Attachment A. The described real property may be a portion of a lazger pazcel. In such circumstance the parties and their invitees, licenses and representatives may, by mutual agreement utilize any reasonable portion of the entire pazcel in a reasonable manner so as to effectuate the intent of this Agreement. District agrees to, at all times, maintain the Facilities in a safe and reasonable condition and in full accord with all laws and regulations regulating the subject real property and the management thereof. Section 3: Use and Scheduling Priority. District's high school sponsored activities shall, unless otherwise agreed to by City and District, be accorded the first priority in the scheduling of the Facilities' use as specified in this agreement. City sponsored or scheduled activities shall have a secondary priority. However, once a Facility is scheduled P59 for City event use that reservation shall not be subject to cancellation, limitation, alteration or restriction as a result of District's subsequently arising use except as specifically permitted by this Agreement. Section 4: General Policy Re¢arding Facilitv Scheduling. District shall have the possession, control and scheduling authority for all Facilities except when City is authorized to manage community use scheduling in accordance with this agreement City shall have the responsibility to schedule the following Facilities during the time period the Facilities may be used for non-District community use as specified within this agreement: Outdoor athletic fields and courts -baseball fields, (except Vazsity Baseball Field), sofrball fields, soccer fields, tennis courts and outdoor basketball courts. This Agreement does not include the use of any stadiums, tracks (and the respective field inside the track) or permanent bleachers. A listing of existing fields and courts included under this Joint Use Agreement is attached as Amendment A. The specific schedule of these facilities shall follow the schedule detailed in Section 5. 2. Alta Loma High School Joint Use Community Facility -two classrooms, dance room and weight room #82. Section 5: Permitted Times for Facilitv Usaee. The joint use of the Facilities must respect both traditional and unique use requirements of the Facilities. The following section expressly defines the agreed upon days and times of scheduling and usage of the Facilities by the parties or their licensees and invitees. A. Outdoor Athletic Fields and Courts. City shall schedule these Facilities for community use: a. Facilities with lighting: Monday through Friday between 5:30 p.m. and 10:00 pm. and Saturdays and Sundays between 10:00 a.m. and 10:00 p.m.; b. Facilities without lighting Monday through Friday between 5:30 p.m. and dusk and Saturdays and Sundays between 10:00 a.m. and dusk; c. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary City shall reserve one nonoverlapping unlit field at each Facility fot use by District. This reserved field shall be in addition to the Vazsity Baseball Field and any sports field surrounded by a track. d. City will allocate school sports fields for Community Use (non-city sponsored sports groups) during the falUwinter (August I-January 31) and the spring/summer (February 1 - July 31) 2 P60 2. District shall schedule in conformance with the following: a. District shall have the sole and exclusive right to use and- utilize the Outdoor Athletic Fields and Courts Facilities at all times except as when available to City pursuant to Section S.A.1 above. b. District shall have scheduling privileges in conformance with the CIF league games pursuant to the schedule District shall deliver to City by August 15' of each year for the subsequent school year ahd summer months (August 1 -July 31). c. Notwithstanding the limitations in Section 3 District shall have scheduling priority for all CIF league playoff games provided District delivers City the playoff game schedules in a timely manner after District receives the playoff schedule from CIF. Further during the playoff period a District team actually involved in the playoff competition may, upon forty-eight (48) hour advance notice to City, utilize the Facility they designate until 6:00 p.m. on any day when school is in session. d. Student Health and Safety Rescheduling. In the course of each month "extreme climate conditions" may require the postponement, delay or other adjustment of school athletic schedules. "Extreme Climate Conditions" means that either the temperature or air quality conditions are at a level which has been deemed unsafe or unhealthy by medical experts the parties have deemed reliable. Notwithstanding Section 3, on those days when extreme climate conditions exist, District reserves the right to preempt City events to accommodate the rescheduling of school athletic events. This right is limited as follows: District shall notify City immediately upon District's determination that event rescheduling is necessary. 2. No preemption of a City event shall be permitted if City has scheduled use after dark on a field where the City has installed or funded the lighting equipment at the field. 3. District may elect to utilize the Facility City has reserved pursuant to Section SA1C. e. District Special Usage. District may request, and City agrees to use its best reasonable efforts to accommodate unique District related usage (e.g. marching Band or ROTC practice.) District shall provide City forty-eight (48) hours notice of such request. District may elect to utilize the Facility City has reserved pursuant to Section SA1C. In the event that the school schedules any event or activity that requires the use of City funded lighting at Los Osos High School, the school, or group 3 P61 will schedule the use of the fields and lights directly with the Cit}~ for such use and pay the appropriate fees directly to the City. B. Alta Loma Joint Use Community Facility. City shall schedule this Facility during all times of community use during all 12 months of the year; District shall maintain the right to possess, control and schedule the Facility at all other times. City usage. The City will schedule this Facility for use by the City or City authorized users as follows: A. Classrooms School usage days. Monday through Friday, City usage is permitted between the hours of 4:00 p.m. through 9:30 p.m.; 2. Nonschool usage days including summer and holidays. Monday through Friday, City usage is permitted between 8:00 a.m. and 9:30 p.m., 3. Saturdays and Sundays. City usage is permitted between 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. The City will be responsible for opening and closing the classrooms, dance room and provide on-site supervision of each program by qualified program staff or instructors at its own cost to ensure the classroom is in a usable condition, clean and free of any items that may prevent City's or City's users use and enjoyment of the classroom and who~will secure the facility at the end time of the use. District further agrees to outfit the classrooms solely with tables and chairs of a type and nature that can be taken down or relocated so as to accommodate the City or its user's needs. B. Dance Room. City will schedule this Facility from 6:00 p.m. to 9:30 p.m., Monday through Friday and from 12:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m. on Saturdays and Sundays. C. Weight Room Number 82. City will schedule this Facility: 1. On school-days - Monday through Friday from 4:00 p.m. to 9:30 p.m.; 2. On nonschool days -Monday through Friday-from 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.; 3. On Saturdays and Sundays from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. 4 P62 2. District shall retain the priority right to schedule the Facilities described in Section SB1 except during those hours designated for City's use. City shall be responsible for the reservation of the Facilities described in Section SB 1 at all times during community usage. C. Other Community Use Facilities. District shall have the sole duty and authority to schedule events at these Facilities. These facilities include all other high school facilities other than those specifically detailed in Section 5, A & B above. District has priority for use at all of the Community Use Facilities. City shall have the secondary priority as to use of all Community Use Facilities. District's priority shall be manifested by District's design on or before July15 of each calendaz year, for the dates of August 1 -July 31 that District requires the use of these Facilities. District and City may, on a first come, first served basis reserve all other days that the Facilities aze available for use. District will, whenever possible, provide the City with scheduling priority over all other outside organizations. District agrees to use its best efforts to make these Facilities available to City and City's licenses and invitees, as often and for as long a time as is possible. City agrees to provide District, on or before May 30 of each year, a twelve (12) month schedule of all dates and times that City desires to reserve these Facilities. Section 6: Further Cooperation. - City and District, by and through their designated representatives, shall monthly coordinate the scheduling of the Facilities. This coordination is for the purpose of evaluating the schedule of events to avoid or resolve any scheduling issues. The City of Rancho Cucamonga is responsible for allocating all City pazks and school fields to all non-profit youth sports groups that are based in Rancho Cucamonga. In order for them to receive priority allocations that aze also free of charge they must apply and submit to an allocation process that provides the youth sports groups equitable and appropriate sports field space. This process frees the district from having to manage this challenging process. District agrees to inform any non- profit youth sports organization requesting school outdoor fields and courts directly through the school free of chazge, excluding rentals, that they must apply through the City for allocation of school fields through the City's bi-annual field allocation process. Section 7: Citv Fiscal Contribution. City agrees to provide economic contribution to District consistent with the following subsections. 5 P63 A. Los Osos High School Lighting. The City of Rancho Cucamonga has installed sports field lighting for two soccer fields, one regulation sized sofrball field and one regulation baseball field. City and District agree to work together to establish the terms and conditions that will guide the installation of all or any part of any future lighting projects funded by the City. City shall be responsible for all costs, including environmental cleazurces, associated with installation of the lighting. The sports field lighting previously funded by the City is the property of District. District shall manage the necessary maintenance and repair of the installed sports field lighting, in cooperation with City. As part of the initial sports Feld lighting construction, the City funded atwenty-five (25) yeaz maintenance agreement with the manufacturer which will provide for all normal and routine maintenance requirements during this period. In the event that there are maintenance and/or repair costs anticipated which aze not covered by the maintenance agreement, the District and' City will meet to discuss the issue and proposed maintenance/repair costs prior to the authorization of such repairs. The District and its insurance carrier shall determine if there is appropriate insurance coverage to fund any significant or extraordinary maintenance or repair costs which are not covered by this maintenance agreement, consistent with insurance use policies at other District facilities. The District does not assume the responsibility for any applicable deductible costs. The City will determine if it has the funding available for the proposed maintenance/repair. If the City has no funding available, District and City may elect to delay the maintenance/repair until City funding becomes available, and if is understood that this might require the shutdown of the lights until the repairs aze made at a future date. Any capital project improvements aze to be negotiated. District will invoice the City on a monthly basis for actual electrical costs used. Any capital project improvements are to be negotiated. District will invoice the City on a monthly basis for actual electrical costs used. B. Annual Contribution. City agrees to pay directly to each high school the sum of six thousand dollars ($6,000.00) per yeaz per school site, for the use of those facilities as identified on Attachment A, on the anniversary of the original Effective Date of this Agreement (November 6, 2002). The six thousand dollaz ($6,000.00) per high school payment shall increase by two thousand dollars ($2,000.00) per high school every fifth year that this Agreement is in force based on the original Effective Date of this Agreement (November 6, 2002). This payment, whenever made, shall be full payment to each high school for all of City's annual usage of the high school facilities. 6 P64 C. City shall reimburse District the actual costs of electricity used by field or court lighting during any period when City or City's licensee or invitee is using the Facilities but only when the ]ighting was funded or installed by City (for both field or court uses). Section 8: Fees for Facility Usaee. District shall not charge City any fee for the usage of the Facilities except as set forth in this Agreement. The City shall, in addition to any consideration set forth elsewhere in this Agreement: A. Pay the compensation due apart-time, temporary custodian that District shall employ each June and July for the purpose of cleaning the Alta Loma High School Joint Use Facility after City usage, and not for any other Facility or location. B. City shall quarterly pay to District, the sum that reflects City usage of District's theatres and swimming pools. District shall use its best efforts to reduce the costs to City by efficient scheduling of personnel. District shall chazge City for the actual time City uses the-theatre or swimming pool facilities at the District's adopted rates. C. District expects City and user groups to provide general clean-up afer each use. District may chazge non-profit user groups for use of restrooms or require them to place portable restrooms on site at the group's expense D. District will be responsible for the cost of use of tennis court lights at Alta Loma High School. Section 9: Term and Termination. The term of this Agreement shall be for twenty-five (25) yeazs commencing on the Effective Date. Notwithstanding the term, either party may terminate this Agreement for cause on the anniversary of the Effective Date, provided that the termination is based on the following: A. The party electing to terminate the Agreement provides the other not less than six (6) months prior written notice of such election. B. The written notice must set forth substantial evidence of the existence of one or more of the following circumstances: ' An uncured breach of this Agreement; 2. The District's educational needs conflict with City's use of all of the Facilities identified; 3. The District has determined that City's usage of all 7 P65 Facilities has created a cost of repair and maintenance that is excessive. If City has paid for the installation of lighting and District elects to terminate this Agreement prior to the lapse of the twenty-five (25) yeaz term District shall pay to City the sum of money determined by the following formula. The total material and installation cost of the lighting installed in the Facilities ($1,109,213.00) shall be divided by twenty-five. The dollaz amount that is the one twenty-fifth share shall be multiplied by the number of years remaining on the twenty-five (25) yeaz term of the Agreement. The sum resulting from such multiplication shall be paid in full to City by District on or before the last day of the Agreement. Section 10: Indemnity and Insurance. A. City shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless District and its officers, officials, employees and bonafide agents (collectively "Indemnitees". and individually "Indemnitee") with respect to any and all claims, liabilities, demands, expenses, liens, fees, costs and damages, including payment of reasonable attomeys fees, for injury or death to any person, or damage to any property, arising out of, or incurred in connection with, the negligent acts or omissions of the City or of any City officer, employee, agent or invitee, or any failure by the City to perform its affirmative obligations set forth in this Agreement. B District shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless the City and its officers, officials, employees and bonafide agents (collectively "Indemnitees" and individually "Indemnitee") with respect to any and all claims, liabilities, demands, expenses, liens, fees, costs and damages, including payment of reasonable attorneys fees, for injury or death to any person, or damage to any property, arising out of, or incurred in connection with, the negligent acts or omissions of the District or of any District officer, employee, agent, student or invitee, any failure by the District to perform its affirmative obligations set forth in this Agreement, or from District's status as owner of the Facilities. C. City and District each shall maintain current and in full effect commercial general and automobile liability insurance policies, which may be satisfied either by self-insurance, joint powers authority mechanism, or by policies of insurance procured through an insurance company authorized to do business in the State of California and having an A.M. Best rating of not less than A:VIL Such poli(cies) shall have a minimum limit of not less than One Million Dollazs ($1,000,000.00) per occurrence, or twice that amount if an aggregate policy is provided. Each policy shall name the other's elected officials, officers, and employees as additional insureds.' 8 P66 Section 1 L Extraordinary Wear and Emergencies. District shall be solely responsible for the ordinary wear and tear experienced by the Facilities. In the event City or any third party authorized by City use results in the damage or destruction of the Facility or any of District's personal property therein, City shall promptly replace such property or reimburse District for the costs of any necessary repair. District shall not interfere with and shall cooperate with City in City's efforts to recover any damages from any third party City reasonably believes to be liable for the subject damage or destruction. Further, in any event emergency maintenance and/or repairs are necessary to make the subject Facility safe for usage by City or its invitees or licensees, District, without being subject to a claim of breach of this Agreement, may elect to close the Facility to use by both City and District. City and District further agree that the fields require a time period each year, not less than thirty (30) days in length, for renovation and replanting. City and District shall mutually determine the time period when this renovation is to occur. The parties shall use their best efforts to select a time period where the activities will cause the least interruption of use by City and District. Section 12: Records and Insaections. City and District each shall maintain full and accurate records with respect to all matters covered under this Agreement. City and District each shall have access, without charge, during normal business hours to such records, and the right to examine and audit the same and to make transcripts therefrom, and to inspect all program data, documents, proceedings, and activities. Section 13: Parties Not Obligated to Third Parties. Neither City nor District shall be obligated or liable under this Agreement to any party other than as is set forth in this Agreement. Section 14: Personnel, Equipment and Materials. Each of City and District represents that it has, or will secure at its own expense, all personnel, equipment and materials required to perform the services required under this Agreement. All of the services required under this Agreement will be performed by the responsible party or under its supervision, and all personnel engaged in the work shall be qualified to perform such services. Section 15: Force Maieure. Neither City nor District shall not be liable for any failure to perform if acceptable evidence has been submitted to the other that failure to perform the Agreement was due to causes beyond the control and without the fault or negligence of the nonperforming party. Examples of such causes include acts of 9 P67 God, civil disturbances, fire, war, or floods, but do not include labor related incidents, such as strikes or work stoppages. Section 16: Notices. Any notices, bills, invoices, or reports required by this Agreement shall be conclusive]y deemed received on (a) the day of delivery if delivered by hand during the party's regular business hours; or (b) on the third business day following deposit in the United States mail, postage prepaid, to the addresses heretofore below, or to such other addresses as the parties may, from time to time, designate in writing pursuant to the. provisions of this section. If to City: City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Post Office Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91729-0807 Attention:-Jack Lam, City Manager if to District: Chaffey Joint Union High School District 211 W. Fifth Street Ontario, California 91762 Attention: District Superintendent Section 17: Assienability; Subcontracting. Neither party shall assign or transfer any interest in this Agreement nor the performance of any of such party's obligations hereunder, including the performance of any of such party's obligations by an subcontractors, without the prior written consent of the other party, and any attempt by such party to subcontract any work or assign this Agreement or any rights, duties; or obligations arising hereunder shall be void and of no effect. Section 18: Compliance with Laws. Both City and District shall comply with all applicable federal, state, county and loca] laws, ordinances, codes and regulations. Section 19: Non-Waiver of Terms. Rights and Remedies. Waiver by either party of any one or more of the conditions of performance under this Agreement shall not be a waiver of any other condition of performance under this Agreement. Section 20: Remedies Cumulative. Each right, power and remedy provided for herein or now or hereafter existing at law, in equity, by statute, or otherwise shall be cumulative and shall be in addition to every other right, power, or 10 P68 remedy provided for herein or now or hereafter existing at law, in equity, by statute, or otherwise, and the exercise, the commencement of the exercise, or the forbeazance of the exercise by any party of any one or more of such rights, powers or remedies shall not preclude the simultaneous or later exercise by such party of any or all of such other rights, powers or remedies. Section 21: Attornev's Fees. In the event that either party to this Agreement shall continence any legal action or proceeding to enforce or interpret the provisions of this Agreement, the prevailing party in such action or proceeding shall be entitled to recover its costs of suit, including reasonable attorney's fees. Section 22: Exhibits: Precedence. All documents referenced as exhibits in this Agreement aze hereby incorporated in this Agreement. In the event of any material discrepancy between the express provisions of this Agreement and the provisions of any document incorporated herein by reference, the provisions of this Agreement shall prevail. Section 23: Entire Agreement. This Agreement, and any other documents incorporated herein by specific reference, represent the entire and integrated agreement between District and City. This Agreement supersedes any and all other agreements, either oral or in writing, between the parties with respect to the subject matter herein. Each party to this Agreement acknowledges and agrees that no representations by any party which aze not embodied herein and no other agreement, statement or promise not contained in this Agreement shall be valid and binding. Any modification of this Agreement will. be effective only if it is in writing signed by the parties. Section 24: GoverninP Law; Venue. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California. Any legal action brought for any purpose that azises, directly or indirectly, from this Agreement and the performance or failure to perform under the Agreement shall be brought in the superior court in the County of San Bemazdino, California. Section 25: Severabilitv. Wherever possible, each provision of this Agreement shall be interpreted in such a manner as to be valid under applicable law. if any provision of this Agreement, or the application of it to any person or circumstances, is determined by a court of competent jurisdiction to be unenforceable, such provision shall be severed from and shall not affect the remainder of the Agreement. P69 Section 26: Captions. The captions used in this Agreement are solely for reference and the convenience of the parties. Said captions are not a par[ of the Agreement and in no way bind, limit, or describe the scope or intent of any provision, and shall have no effect upon the construction or interpretation of any provision herein. Section 27: Sienatures: Each party affirms that the signatures and titles set forth hereinafrer in the execution of this Agreement represent all persons authorized to execute this Agreement and are sufficient to bind the respective party. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement as of the date first written above. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DISTRICT A Municipal Corporation ~ !/ O, !~ Name Name Sue Ovitt Title Title City Clerk Clerk, Board of Trustees 12 P70 ATTACHMENT A HIGH SCHOOL FIELDS/COURTS INCLUDED FIELDS EXCLUDED Alta Loma Hieh School *Junior Varsity Soccer Field *Varsity Football/Soccer 8880 Base Line Road and the overlaying Varsity Girls (inside Tmck) Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91701 *Softball and Junior Varsity Girls *Varsity Baseball (90') (909) 989-551 1 Softball Fields *Junior Varsity Football/Freshman Soccer Field and [he overlaying Junior Varsity Baseball Field *Softball practice field south of the Rock House *4 Unlit.Tennis Courts *4 Lighted Tennis Courts *8 Outdoor Basketball Courts Etiwanda High School *Junior Varsity Baseball Field *Varsity Baseball (90') 13500 Victoria Avenue *Junior Varsity Softball Field *Junior Varsity Soccer/ Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91739 *Varsity Softball Field and (2) Football Field (909) 899-2531 Softball Fields (#2 & 3) overlay (Inside Track) ' the Varsity Soccer/Football/ Baseball field and may not be used when the overlaying Vazsi[y Baseball Field is in use by the High School or when the overlaying Varsity Soccer/ Football Fields are used by the school. *6 Outside unlighted Basketball Courts *8 Unlighted Tennis Courts Los Osos Hieh School *Softball Field (60') *Lit Varsity Football 6001 Milliken Avenue (Future Lighting) (Inside Stadium) Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91737 *Softball Field (60') w/Soccer Field *Varsity Baseball (909)477-6900 overlay *Junior Varsity Baseball Field (90') *5 Basketball Courts . (Future Lighting) *8 Lit Tennis Courts (Future Lighting) Rancho Cucamonga Hieh School *Varsity Soccer Field overlaying *Varsity Baseball Field 11801 Lark Drive Varsity Baseball Field and overlaying Varsity Rancho Cucamonga, CA 9]701 Only available for use when Soccer Field (909)989-1600 Varsity Baseball Field is not in use *Varsity Football Field *Junior Varsity Soccer Field and overlaying Junior Varsity Baseball Field *Varsity (north) Softball Field and Junior Varsity (south) Softball Field ~- . overlaying the Junior Varsity Football Field *5 Non-lit Basketball Courts *8 Non-lit Tennis Courts 13 STAFF REPORT - R~NCHO CUCAMONG~ FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT RANCHO Date: ~ August 3, 2011 cUCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Man er From: Mike Bell, Fire Chie~~~~ By: Breanna Medina, Mana ement Analyst II/Emergency Management Program Subject: APPROVAL TO ACCEPT GRANT REVENUE IN THE AMOUNT OF $71,103.00 AWARDED BY THE CALIFORNIA EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY (FY2010 HOMELAND SECURITY GRANT), AND ADMINISTERED BY THE SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT, OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES TO THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT INTO ACCOUNT 1380000-4740 (GRANT INCOME) RECOMMENDATION Approve the acceptance of grant revenue in the amount of $71,103.00 awarded by the California Emergency Management Agency (FY2010 Homeland Security Grant), and administered by the San Bernardino County Fire Department, Office of Emergency Services to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District into Account 1380000-4740 (Grant Income). BACKGROUND The FY2010 Homeland Security Grant contained anon-competitive portion of funding designated for each Fire Department/District in the San Bernardino County Operational Area. The funds allocated to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District have been designated for a future equipment purchase of Ballistic Body Armor as part of a recently completed comprehensive, multi- discipline (police and fire) response protocol against terrorist activity on school campuses. P71 STAFF REPORT ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT Date: August 3, 2011 To: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager From: Mark A. Steuer, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer By: Romeo M. David, Associate Engineer Shelley Hayes, Assistant Engineer . . ~~ RANCHO C,UCAMONGA Subject: ACCEPT THE HERMOSA AVENUE COMMUNITY TRAIL .AND PARKWAY LANDSCAPE FROM LEMON AVENUE TO 200' NORTH OF MANZANITA DRIVE AND TRAIL FENCING ON ARCHIBALD AVENUE, CONTRACT NO. 11-003, AS COMPLETE, RELEASE THE BONDS, ACCEPT A MAINTENANCE BOND, AND AUTHORIZE THE CITY ENGINEER TO FILE A NOTICE OF COMPLETION AND APPROVE THE FINAL CONTRACT AMOUNT OF $246,390.11 RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council accept the Hermosa Avenue Community Trail and Parkway Landscape from Lemon Avenue to 200' north of Manzanita Drive and Trail Fencing on Archibald Avenue, Contract No. 11-003, as complete, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion, release the Faithful Performance Bond, accept a Maintenance Bond, authorize the release of the Labor and Materials Bond in the amount of $224,115.34 six months after the recordation of said notice if no claims have been received, and authorize the release of the retention in the amount of $24,639.01, 35 days after acceptance. Also, approve the final contract amount of $246,390.11. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The subject project has been completed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications and to the satisfaction of the City.Engineer. The Hermosa Avenue Community Trail and Parkway Landscape from Lemon Avenue to 200' north of Manzanita Drive and Trail Fencing on Archibald Avenue improvements scope of work consisted of construction of a community trail PVC fence with decomposed granite surface, cobblestone hardscape, planting areas with street trees, shrubs and groundcover, sidewalk, D.G. walking path, and replacement of drive approaches and irrigation system. Pertinent information of the project is as follows: - Budgeted Amount: - Account Numbers: - Engineer's Estimate: - City Council Approval to Advertise: - Publish dates for local paper: $435,000.00 1110316-5650/1755110-0 and 1110316- 5650/1757110-0 $282,771.17 December 1, 2010 December 7 and 14, 2010 P72 P73 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT RE: Hermosa Avenue Community Trail and Parkway Landscape from Lemon Avenue to 200' north of Manzanita Drive and Trail Fencing on Archibald Avenue August 3, 2011 Page 2 ~ Bid Opening: ~ Contract Award Date: ~ Low Bidder: r Contract Amount: - 10% Contingency: - Final Contract Amount: - Difference in Contract Amount: December 21, 2010 January 19, 2011 Rancho Pacific Engineering Inc. $224,115.34 $22,411.53 $246,390.11 $22,274.77 (9.94%) The net increase in the total cost of the project is a result of four (4) Contract Change Orders, including the balancing statement. The notable changes that were significant to the increase of the Contract amount were installing a four course high block wall fronting SBCFCD's property due to grade difference, installing water bars on the trail to prevent erosion from rain and other water, and removal of an old agricultural pipe in the way of the new sidewalk. The balancing statement accounted for other minor increases and decreases in the project quantities. Respectfully submitted, Mark A. Steuer Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer MAS/RMD/SH:Is Attachment CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HERMOSA AVENUE PARKIYAY LANDSCAPE AND TRAIL FROM LEMON AVENUE TO 200' NORTH OF MANZANITA ARCHIBALD AVENUE TRAIL FENCING FROM NORTH OF BANYAN ST TO SOUTH OF SUNFLOIPER ST ~- N x.TS. VICINITY MAP P75 RESOLUTION NO. // X3-3 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE HERMOSA AVENUE COMMUNITY TRAIL AND PARKWAY LANDSCAPE FROM LEMON AVENUE TO 200' NORTH OF MANZANITA DRIVE AND TRAIL FENCING ON ARCHIBALD AVENUE, CONTRACT NO. 11-003 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the Hermosa Avenue Community Trail and Parkway Landscape from Lemon Avenue to 200' north of Manzanita Drive and Trail Fencing on Archibald Avenue, Contract No. 11-003, has been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. DO NOT USE THIS STAFF REPORT. REFERENCE and USE information in the attached following page P115. STAFF REPORT ADMINIS'TR.-1TIVF_ SERVICES DI;Pf1R'I'MENT Date: August 3, 2011 To: Mayor and Members of the City Council_ Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager ~ _._..~ From: John R. Gillison, Assistant City Ma age r By: Ingrid Y. Bruce, GIS/Special Districts Manager Staff Report X ~~-}? RANCHO CUCAMONGA Subject: CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF RESOLUTIONS INITIATING PROCEEDINGS TO LEVY ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS, PRELIMINARILY APPROVE THE ANNUAL ENGINEER'S REPORT, DECLARING THE CITY COUNCIL'S INTENTION TO LEVY ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS WITHIN LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2011112 AND SETTING THE TIME AND PLACE FOR A PUBLIC HEARING THEREON. NO INCREASE OF ASSESSMENT RATE FOR FY 2011112 IS PROPOSED. It is recommended that the City Council approve the Resolutions initiating the proceedings to levy annual assessments, preliminarily approve the annual engineer's report, declaring the City Council's intention to levy annual assessments within Landscape Maintenance District No. 2. There is no increase to the current rates in this district proposed for Fiscal Year 2011/2012. The Engineer's Report is on file in the City Clerk's Office. BACKGROUNDIANALYSIS This year, the City will place on the County Tax Roll Landscape Maintenance District No. 2; the assessments received for this District are utilized for the maintenance and operation of park and landscaping facilities therein. Said maintenance and operation include, but is not limited to turf, ground cover, planter beds, shrubs, plants and trees, landscape lighting, irrigation systems, electrical energy for irrigation controllers, insect/disease control, graffiti removal, hardscapes, entry signs, sound walls and all associated appurtenant facilities. The Fiscal Year 2011/2012 budget is $3,028,890.00. Assessment revenues including delinquencies are estimated at $2,752,380.00. The difference of $276,820.00 will be made up using LMD 2 operating reserves bringing the balance down to $ 1,970,830.00. With the July 20, 2011 failure of Prop 218 Assessment Ballot increase, the assessment rates must remain unchanged from the previous fiscal year 2010/2011 rates. A subsequent report will provide supplementary recommendations to the City Council regarding potential maintenance level adjustments to stay within budget revenues. The assessment rates and district description for the Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 is as follows: Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 assessments pay for the on-going maintenance of parkways, paseos and parks within the Victoria Planned Community. The current assessment rate is $422.00 per single-family residence. The commercial rate is $844.00 per acre, and the vacant rate is $105.50 per acre. P76 Incorrect header. P77 CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF RESOLUTIONS DECLARING THE CITY COUNCIL'S P,~Gr•. 2 INTENTION TO LEVY ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS V-7THIN I~INDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N051, 3A, 3B, ¢R, 5, G-R, 7, 8, 9 AND 10 FOR FISCAL YEAR 201 l /12 AND SETITNG THE TIME AND PLACE FOR A PUBLIC HEARING THEREON. AUGUST 3, 2011 Attachments Resolutions Engineer's Report Item L8. Approval of Resolutions initiating proceedings to levy annual assessments, preliminarily approve the annual Engineer's Report, declaring the City Council's intention to levy annual assessments within Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 for Fiscal Year 2011112 and setting the time and place for a public hearing thereon. NO INCREASE OF ASSESSMENT RATE FOR FY 2011/12 IS PROPOSED. RESOLUTION NOs. 11-134, 11-135 and 11-136 P78 RESOLUTION NO. ~ /-37 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE PREPARATION OF ANNUAL ENGINEER'S REPORT PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE ASSESSMENT LAW FOR PROCEEDINGS FOR THE ANNUAL ASSESSMENT LEVY WITHIN LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2011/12 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, previously undertaken proceedings to form and has formed certain maintenance districts pursuant to pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California (commencing with Section 22500) (the "1972 Act"), known and designated as Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 (a "District"); and WHEREAS, at this time the City Council desires to initiate proceedings pursuant to Chapter 3 of the 1972 Act to provide for the annual levy of assessments for the next ensuing fiscal year to provide for the annual costs for maintenance and servicing of improvements within the District; and WHEREAS, the proceedings for the annual levy of assessments shall relate to the fiscal year commencing July 1, 2011, and ending June 30, 2012 ("Fiscal Year 2011/12"). NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, DETERMINED AND ORDERED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, as follows: SECTION 1. Recitals. The above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2. New Improvements or Substantial Changes in Existing Improvements. No new improvements are proposed to be added to the improvements to be maintained or serviced and no substantial changes in the existing improvements are proposed to be made for Fiscal Year 2011/12. SECTION 3. Annual Engineer's Report. The City Engineer is hereby ordered to prepare and file with this City Council an Annual Engineer's Report for the District relating to such annual assessment and levy in such District in accordance with the provisions of 1972 Act, Article XIIID of the Constitution of the State of California ("Article XIIID") and the Proposition 218 Omnibus Implementation Act (Government Code Section 53750 and following) (the "Implementation Act") (the 1972 Act, Article XIIID and the Implementation Act are referred to collectively as the "Assessment Law"). SECTION 4. Filing of the Annual Engineer's Report. Upon completion, the Annual Engineer's Report for the District shall be filed with the City Clerk, who shall then submit the same to this City Council for its consideration pursuant to the Assessment Law. P79 PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this day of August, 2011. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: L. Dennis Michael, Mayor ATTEST: Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk I, Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was. duly passed, approved and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of said City Council held on 2011. Executed this , at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk P80 RESOLUTION NO. ~/-/~,j RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, PRELIMINARILY APPROVING THE ANNUAL ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR THE ANNUAL LEVY OF ASSESSMENTS WITHIN LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS NO. 2 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2011/12 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, pursuant to the provisions of Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California (the "1972 Act"), Article XIIID of the Constitution of the State of California ("Article XIIID") and the Proposition 218 Omnibus Implementation Act (Government Code Section 53750 and following) (the "Implementation Act") (the 1972 Act, Article XIIID and the Implementation Act are referred to collectively as the "Assessment Law'), did, by previous Resolution, order the preparation of a report for the annual levy of assessments for Fiscal Year 2011/2012 ("Annual Engineer's Report") in maintenance assessment district known and designated as Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 (a "District"); and WHEREAS, there has now been presented to this City Council a separate Annual Engineer's Report for the District as required by the Assessment Law and as previously directed by Resolution; and WHEREAS, this City Council has now examined and reviewed the Annual Engineer's Report as presented, and is satisfied with each and all of the items and documents as set forth in such report, and is satisfied that the assessments on a preliminary basis, have been spread within the District in accordance with the special benefits received from the improvements to be maintained and serviced, as set forth in the applicable Annual Engineer's Report. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, DETERMINED AND ORDERED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, as follows: SECTION 1. Recitals. The above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2. Annual Engineer's Report. The Annual Engineer Report for the District as presented, consisting of the following: A. Plans and specifications describing the general nature, location and extent of the improvements to be maintained and serviced and the extent of such maintenance; B. An estimate of the cost of the maintenance of the improvements for the District for Fiscal Year 2011/12; C. A diagram for such District, showing the area and properties proposed to be assessed; and D. An annual assessment for Fiscal Year 2011/2012 of the estimated costs of the maintenance and servicing of those improvements to be maintained and serviced during such Fiscal Year, assessing the net amount upon all assessable lots and/or parcels within such District in proportion to the special benefits received is hereby approved on a preliminary basis and is ordered to be filed in the Office of the City Clerk as a permanent record and to remain open for public inspection. P81 SECTION 3. The City Clerk shall certify to 'the passage and adoption of this Resolution, and the minutes of this meeting shalt so reflect the presentation of the Annual Levy Reports. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this day of August 2011. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: L. Dennis Michael, Mayor ATTEST: Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk I, Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of said City Council held on .2011. Executed this , at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk P82 RESOLUTION NO. ~j~13 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO PROVIDE FOR THE ANNUAL LEVY AND COLLECTION OF ASSESSMENTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2011/2012 IN LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 AND SETTING A TIME AND PLACE FOR A PUBLIC HEARING THEREON WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has previously formed certain maintenance districts and authorized the levy of assessments therein pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972," being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California (commencing with Section 22500) (the "1972 Act") in what are known and designated as Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 (a "District"); and WHEREAS, this City Council has initiated proceedings to provide for the annual levy of assessments for Fiscal Year 2011/12, to finance the costs and expenses necessary for continued maintenance and servicing of improvements within the District; and WHEREAS, at this time, there has been presented and preliminarily approved by this City Council, a report for each District identified by the distinctive designation of the District and entitled "Fiscal Year 2011/12 Annual Engineer's Report" ("Annual Engineer's Report") as required pursuant to Article 4 of Chapter 1 of the 1972 Act, Article XIIID of the Constitution of the State of California ("Article XIIID") and the Proposition 218 Omnibus Implementation Act (Government Code Section 53750 and following) (the "Implementation Act") (the 1972 Act, Article XIIID and the Implementation Act are referred to collectively as the "Assessment Law"), and this City Council desires to conduct the proceedings to authorize the levy of the annual assessments within each District; and WHEREAS, the annual assessments for Fiscal Year 2011/12 proposed to be levied within the District as set forth in the applicable report do not exceed the annual assessments as previously authorized to be levied within the District and, therefore, the proposed levy of assessments for Fiscal Year 2011/2012 within the District are not deemed to be "increased" over the maximum authorized annual assessments. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, DETERMINED AND ORDERED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, as follows: SECTION 1. Recitals. The above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2. Improvements and Maintenance and Servicing Thereof. The public interest and convenience requires, and it is the intention of this City Council, to undertake proceedings for the annual levy and collection of assessments within the District for the continual maintenance and servicing of the improvements authorized to be maintained and serviced within the District. The improvements include, but are not limited to, turf, ground cover, planter beds, shrubs, plants and trees, landscape lighting, irrigation systems, electrical energy for irrigation controllers, hardscapes, entry signs, sound walls, and all associated appurtenant facilities. A description of the specific improvements to be maintained and serviced within the District is set forth in Appendix A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. P83 "Maintenance" may include the furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operation, and servicing of any improvement, including: (a) repair, removal, or replacement of all or any part of any improvement; (b) providing for the life, growth, health, and beauty of landscaping, including cultivation, irrigation, trimming, spraying, fertilizing, or treating for disease or injury; (c) the removal of trimmings, rubbish, debris, and other solid waste; (d) the cleaning, sandblasting, and painting of walls and other improvements to remove or cover graffiti. "Service" may include the furnishing of: (a) electric current or energy, gas, or other illuminating agent for the.lighting or operation of any improvements; and, (b) water for the irrigation of any landscaping, the operation of any fountains, or the maintenance of any other improvements. Reference is made to the Annual Engineer's Report for further information regarding the improvements to be maintained and serviced for the District and the scope of such maintenance and service. SECTION 3. Annual Engineer's Report. The Annual Engineer's Report regarding the annual levy for the District for Fiscal Year 2011/2012 have been previously approved and directed to be filed in the Office the City Clerk. Reference is made to the report for the District for a full and detailed description of the improvements to be maintained and serviced, the boundaries of the District and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the District. SECTION 4. Assessment. The public interest and convenience requires, and it is the intention of this City Council to order the annual levy of assessments for the District as set forth and described in the Annual Engineer's Report, and further it is determined to be in the best public interest and convenience to levy and collect annual assessments to pay the costs and expenses of such maintenance and service as estimated in such Annual Engineer's Report. SECTION 5. Boundaries of Districts. The proposed maintenance and service work as described in the Annual Engineer's Report for the District is, in the opinion of this City Council, of special benefit to the properties within the boundaries of the District, and this City Council makes the costs and expenses of such maintenance and service chargeable upon such District, which District said City Council hereby declares to be the District specially benefited by such maintenance and service, and to be further assessed pursuant to the Assessment Law to pay the costs and expenses thereof. The District shall include each and every parcel of land within the boundaries thereof; as such District is shown on a map as approved by this City Council and on file in the Office of the City Clerk, and so designated by the name of such District. SECTION 6. Public Hearing. Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held the 17th day of August, 2011, at the hour of 7:00 o'clock p.m. or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard, in the regular meeting of the City Council, being in the Council Chambers located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Raricho Cucamonga, California, which is the time and place fixed by this City Council for the hearing of protests or objections in reference to the annual levy of assessments, to the extent of the maintenance, by any interested person and any other matters contained in this resolution. Any persons who wish to object to the proceedings for the annual levy should file a written protest with the City Clerk prior to the time set and scheduled for said public hearing. P84 SECTION 7. For Information Regarding Proceedings. For any and all information relating to the proceedings, protest procedure, any documentation and/or information of a procedural or technical nature, your attention is directed to the below listed person at the City: Ingrid Bruce GIS/Special Districts Manager City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 (909) 477-2700, Ext 2575 SECTION 8. Notice. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to publish, pursuant to Government Code Section 6061, a copy of this Resolution in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin, a newspaper of general circulation within said City, said publication shall be made one time and not less than ten (10) days before the date set for the Public Hearing. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this day of August, 2011. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: ATTEST: L. Dennis Michael, Mayor Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk I, Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk of the certify that the foregoing Resolution was Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga . 2011. Executed this City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby duly passed, approved and adopted by the City at a regular meeting of said City Council held on at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk P85 Appendix A llcscriptions of Improvements This Appendix A contains general descriptions of the improvements to be maintained and serviced within the District. Please refer to the Annual 1/ngineer's Report for a full and complete description of the maintenance and service to be provided for the District. Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 Landscaping: Parkways (includes turf and ground cover) Median Islands (includes turf and ground cover) Paseos Street Trees Community Trails Parks: (Parks within LMD No. 2 include: Kenyon Park, Windrows Park, Fllena Park, Vintage Park, Victoria Groves Park and Victoria Arbors Park) A-1 P86 Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2011/2012 City of Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 (Caryn Planned Community) P87 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 6 (CARYN PLANNED COMMUNITY) 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Phone: 909.477.2700 Fax: 909.477.2741 CITY COUNCIL L. Dennis Michael, Mayor Sam Spagnolo, Mayor Pro Tem William Alexander, Council Member Chuck Buquet, Council Member Diane Williams, Council Member CITY STAFF John R. Gillison, Assistant City Manager Linda D. Daniels, Deputy City Manager William Wittkopf, Public Works Director Ingrid Y. Bruce, GIS/Special Districts Manager Christopher Bopko, Management Analyst III P88 TABLE OF CONTENTS ENGINEER'S LETTER INTRODUCTION 1 3 Reason for Assessment .............................................................................................3 Process for Annual Assessment .................................................................................3 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS 5 Description of the Boundaries of the District ...............................................................5 Description of Improvements and Services ................................................................5 Map of Improvements ...............................................................................................17 ESTIMATE OF COSTS ~$ District Budget ..........................................................................................................18 Definitions of Budget Items .......................................................................................19 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT 27 Ge ne ra I ............................................................................. ........................................ 21 Special Benefit ................................................................. ........................................21 General Benefit ................................................................ ........................................22 Method of Assessment Spread ........................................ ........................................22 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM ASSESSMENT ROLL 24 25 Assessment Roll .......................................................................................................25 Annexations .............................................................................................................. 25 P89 ENGINEER'S LETTER WHEREAS, on ,the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga (the "City'), under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 (the "1972 Act") adopted its Resolution No. _, a Resolution Initiating Proceedings for the Levy of Anhual Assessments for Landscape Maintenance District No. 6 (Caryn Planned Community) (the "District"); and WHEREAS, the Resolution Initiating Proceedings directed staff to prepare and file an Engineer's Report for Fiscal Year 2011/12 pursuant to the requirements of the 1972 Act. The Engineer's Report presents the plans and specifications describing the general nature, location and extent of the improvements to be maintained, an estimate of the costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements for the District for the referenced fiscal year, a diagram for the District, showing the area and properties proposed to be assessed, and an assessment of the estimated costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing the improvements, assessing the net amount upon all assessable lots arid/or parcels within the District in proportion to the special benefit received; and NOW THEREFORE, the following assessment is proposed to be authorized in order to pay. the estimated costs of maintenance, operation and servicing of the improvements to be paid by the assessable real property within the boundaries of the District in proportion to the special benefit received. The following table summarizes the proposed assessment. SUMMARY OF ASSESSMENT Fiscal Year 2011/12 Total Estimated Assessment $2,963,200.00 Less Anticipated~Delinquencies 210 820.00 Total Estimated Revenue $2,752,380..00 Plus Reserve Fund Contribution 276.510.00 Total Expenditure Budget $3,028,890.00 Total District EBU Count 6,574.05 Actual Assessment per EBU $422.00 Maximum Allowable Assessment per EBU $422.00 In making the assessments contained herein pursuant to the 1972 Act: I have identified all parcels which will have a special benefit conferred upon them from the improvements described in the Special Benefit Section of this Engineer's Report (the "Specially Benefited Parcels"). For particulars as to the identification of said parcels, reference is made to the Assessment Diagram, a copy'of which is included in this Engineer's Report. 2. I have evaluated the costs and expenses of the improvements upon the Specially Benefited Parcels. In making such evaluation: Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2011 /12 P90 a. The proportionate special benefit derived by each Specially Benefited Parcel from the improvements was determined in relationship to the entirety of the maintenance costs of the improvements; b. No assessment has been imposed on any Specially Benefited Parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on such parcel from the improvements; and c. Any general benefits from the improvements have been separated from the special benefits and only special benefits have been assessed. I, the undersigned, respectfully submit the enclosed Engineer's Report and, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, the Engineer's Report, Assessments, and the Assessment Diagram herein have been prepared and computed in accordance with the order of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Assessment Law. Mark A. Steuer, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2011/12 P91 INTRODUCTION Reason for Assessment Approval of the assessment covered by this Engineer's Report will generate the revenue necessary to: Provide for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements described in this Engineer's Report. Maintenance may include but is not limited to, all of the following: the repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement, providing for the life, growth, health and beauty of the landscaping, including cultivation, irrigation, trimming, spraying, fertilizing or treating for disease or injury, the removal of trimming, rubbish, debris and other solid waste, the maintenance, repair and replacement as necessary of all irrigation systems and the removal of graffiti from walls immediately adjacent to the cultivated areas. Servicing means the furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operating and servicing of any improvement. Servicing shall also include vehicle, equipment, capital improvements and administrative costs associated with the annual administration and operation of the District. Process for Annual Assessment The City cannot levy and collect annual assessments within the District without complying with the procedures specified in the 1972 Act. On an annual basis, an Engineer's Report must be prepared which contains a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the district. The City Council must also adopt a resolution of intention which: • Declares the intention of the City Council to levy and collect assessments within the assessment district for the fiscal year stated therein. • Generally describes the existing and proposed improvements and any substantial changes proposed to be made in existing improvements. • Refers to the assessment district by its distinctive designation and indicate the general location of the district. • Refers to the report of the engineer, on file with the clerk, for a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the district. • Gives notice of the time and place for public hearing by the City Council on the levy of the proposed assessment. • States whether the assessment is proposed to increase from the previous year. If the assessments are to be levied in the same or lesser amounts than the maximum assessment amount approved, the clerk shall give notice by causing the resolution of intention to be published. Any interested person may, prior to the conclusion of the public hearing, file a written protest which shall state all grounds of objection. The protest shall contain a description sufficient to identify the property owned by the property owner filing the protest. During the course or upon conclusion of the hearing, the City Council may order changes in any of the matters provided in the report, including changes in the improvements, any zones within the assessment district, and the proposed diagram or the proposed assessment. The City Council, upon conclusion of the public hearing must then adopt a resolution confirming the diagram and assessment, either as originally proposed or as changed by it. The adoption of the resolution shall constitute the levy of an assessment for the fiscal year referred to in the assessment. Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2011/12 P92 If the assessment to be levied exceeds the maximum assessment amount previously approved, the City must comply with the procedures specified in Article XIII D and Proposition 218. The voters in the State of California in November 1996 added Article XIII D to the California Constitution imposing, among other requirements, the necessity for the City to conduct an assessment ballot procedure to enable the owners of each property on which assessments are proposed to be enacted or increased, the opportunity to express their support for, or opposition to the proposed assessment or increase in such assessment. The basic steps of the assessment ballot procedure are outlined below. The City must prepare a Notice of Public Hearing ("Notice'), which describes, along with other mandated information, the reason for the proposed assessments, and to provide a date and time of a public hearing to be held on the matter. The City must also prepare an assessment ballot, which clearly gives the property owner the ability to sign and mark their assessment ballot either in favor of, or in opposition to the proposed assessment. The Notice and assessment ballot are mailed to each affected property owner within the District a minimum of 45 days prior to the public hearing date as shown in the Notice. The City may also hold community meetings with the property owners to discuss the issues facing the District and to answer property owner questions directly. After the Notice and assessment ballot are mailed, property owners are given until the close of the public hearing, stated in the Notice, to return their signed and marked assessment ballot. During the public hearing, property owners are given the opportunity to address the City Council and ask questions or voice their concerns. At the public hearing, the returned assessment ballots received prior to the close of the public hearing are tabulated, weighted by the proposed assessment amount on each property and the results are announced by the City Council. Article XIII D provides that if, as a result of the assessment ballot proceeding, a majority protest is found to exist, the City Council shall not have the authority to levy and collect the assessments as proposed. A majority protest exists if the assessments represented by ballots submitted in opposition eicceed those submitted in favor of the assessment. All returned ballots are tabulated and weighted according to the financial obligation of each particular parcel. If there is no majority protest as described above, the City Council may approve the proposed assessments. If there is a majority protest, as described above, the City will not levy and collect any assessments. Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2011 /12 P93 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS The District provides for the administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing of various improvements located within the public right-of-way and dedicated easements within the boundaries of the District. Description of the Boundaries of the District The District is located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The boundaries of the District are generally described as that area located south of the I-210 Freeway, west of Etiwanda Avenue, southwest of the 1-15 Freeway and east of Haven Avenue, also known as the Victoria Planned Community, and are more particularly in the diagram of the District ircluded herein. Reference is also made to the Assessment Diagram included in this Report. Description of Improvements and Services The improvements maintained by the District include the parkways, median islands, street trees, paseos, community trails and parks within the Victoria Planned Community and as such are of direct and special benefit to the parcels within that community. These improvements are located within the street public right-of-ways and dedicated public easements which are within the boundaries of the District. The landscaping maintenance includes, but is not limited to, turf, ground cover, shrubs and trees, sprinkler and irrigation systems, drainage systems, masonry walls, entryway monument, and associated appurtenances. Services include personnel, materials, contracting services, utilities, capital projects and all necessary costs associated with the maintenance, replacement and repair required to keep the improvements in a healthy, vigorous and satisfactory condition. Park lighting as well as lighting along the paseos/walkways is also included. In addition, it is the City's intention to continue to use cost effective materials, including the future ability to replace landscaping with drought resistant or low water use plants, in order to lower expenses of the District. The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows: Parks: Kenyon Park, Windrows Park, Ellena Park, Vintage Park, Victoria Groves Park and Victoria Arbors Park. The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows: Site # Descriptive Location 2-1 The west side of Arbor Lane from the traffic circle to Church. The Arbor Lane median from Church to the traffic circle. The east side of Arbor Lane from Long Meadow to Church. The paseo from the west side of Arbor Lane to Day Creek Blvd. The paseo from the west side of Arbor Lane to Saintsbury. The north side of Winery Drive from Arbor Lane to 214 feet west of Arbor Lane. The south side of Long Meadow Drive from Freestone Court to Duck Creek Place. Ground cover area: 93,639 square feet Hardscape: 59,041 square feet 2-2 The northwest corner of Day Creek Blvd. and Church. The north side of Church from Day Creek Blvd. to 1,152 feet west of Hess. The paseo from the north side of Church to Dry Creek Drive. The paseo from the north side of Church to Pine Ridge PI. The west side of Hess Place from the north side of Church to Dry Creek Drive. The south side of Church from 145 feet east of Hyssop to 896 feet east of Hyssop. Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 5 Fiscal Year 2011/12 P94 Ground cover area: 24,018 square feet Hardscape: 26,617 square feet 2-3 The west side of Day Creek from 250 feet north of Appellation to Church. The east side of Day Creek from Church to Madrigal. The Day Creek median from Church to Baseline. The south side of Madrigal from Day Creek to Roundhill. Ground cover area: 35,420 square feet Hardscape: 42,671 square feet 2-4 Victoria Park Lane from Baseline to the east entrance of Arbor Park. The southwest corner of Victoria Park Lane and Baseline. The southeast corner of Victoria Park Lane to 445 feet east of Victoria Park Lane. Ground cover area: 36,482 square feet Turf area: 3,874 square feet Hardscape: 32,927 square feet 2-5 The east and west side of Victoria Park Lane and the medians from Mosaic Dr. to Church. Ground cover area: 56,358 square feet Hardscape: 20,390 square feet 2-6 The north side of Church from Arbor Lane to Day Creek. The northwest corner of Church and Arbor Lane. The paseo from the north side of Church to Wilson Creek Dr... Ground cover area: 18,469 square feet Hardscape: 15,159 square feet 2-7 The north side of Church from Victoria Park Lane to Arbor Lane. The northwest corner of Victoria Park Lane and Church. The paseo from the north side of Church to Elk Cove Court. The paseo from the north side of Church to Freestone Court. The northeast corner of Arbor Lane and Church. Ground cover area: 16,609 square feet Hardscape: 13,730 square feet 2-8 The paseo from the west side of Etiwanda to Silver Rose Court. The north side of Church from Etiwanda to Victoria Park Lane. The east side of Iron Horse PI. from Church to Wild Horse Way. The paseo from the north side of Church to Cloudy Bay Ct. The medians from Iron Horse PI. to Etiwanda. Ground cover area: 35,122 square feet Hardscape: 28,473 square feet *863 square feet of ground cover added due to the addition of the Silver Rose paseo on 2- 14-07.The previous square footage was 34,259. VW-1 Base Line median from Victoria Park Lane to 830 feet west of Victoria Park Lane. Ground cover area: 4,514 square feet Hardscape: 3,474 square feet Mulchscape: 0 square feet VW-2 The north side of Baseline 300 feet east and 200 feet west of Swanson. The east and west sides of Swanson from Baseline to Province. The paseo from the intersection of Swanson and Province to Atwood with outlet to Dunmore. The paseo from Atwood to the Southern Pacific Railroad. The north side of Saratoga from Powell to Dunmore. The paseo from Saratoga to Etiwanda. The south side of Atwood from Victoria Park Lane to Travis. The north side of Atwood from Walcott to Victoria Park Lane. Ground cover area: 18,753 square feet Turf area: 73,931 square feet Hardscape: 22,615 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2011 /12 P95 VW-3 The Victoria Park Lane median and the west and east side parkways from Baseline to the entrance to Victoria Village. Ground cover area: 24,453 square feet Turf area: 2,637 square feet Hardscape: 3,214 square feet VW-4 The Victoria Park Lane median and the west and east side parkways from Victoria Village entrance to Atwood. Ground cover area: 30,695 square feet Turt area: 10,242 square feet Hardscape: 6,428 square feet VW-5 The Victoria Park Lane median and the west side and east side parkways from Atwood to the Southern Pacific Railroad. Ground cover area: 49,513 square feet Hardscape: 5,467 square feet VW-6 The paseo running north from 12732 Farrington to the Southern Pacific Railroad. Ground cover area: 285 square feet Hardscape: 679 square feet VW-7 The paseo running north from 12840 Farrington to the Southern Pacific Railroad. Ground cover area: 266 square feet Hardscape: 552 square feet VW-8 The Victoria Park Lane median and the west side parkway from the Southern Pacific Railroad to South Victoria Windrows Loop. The Victoria Park Lane east side parkway from the Southern Pacific Railroad to Zinnia Ct.. Ground cover area: 40,548 square feet Hardscape: 6,150 square feet Mulchscape: 0 square feet VW-9 The Victoria Park Lane east side parkway from Barberry to North Victoria Windrows Loop at Windrows Park. Ground cover area: 9,188 square feet Turt area: 3,851 square feet Hardscape: 3,720 square feet VW-10 The west side of Victoria Park Lane from South Victoria Windrows Loop to Dahlia Ct... The Victoria Park Lane median from Zinnia Ct. to Dahlia Ct...The east side of Victoria Park Lane from North Victoria Windrows Loop at Windrows Park to Dahlia Ct. Ground cover area: 25,148 square feet Turt area: 37,350 square feet Hardscape: 11,400 square feet "4-15-10 Reduction of 2,250 square feet of ground cover. Area between Windrows Park and outer trail fence has been mulchscaped and turned over to the Parks Department. VW-11 The east side parkway on South Victoria Windrows Loop from Silktassel to Victoria Park Lane. The parkway on the south side of Victoria Park Lane from the intersection of South Victoria Windrows Loop and North Victoria Windrows Loop to Dahlia Ct... The Victoria Park Lane median from the intersection of North and South Victoria Windrows Loop to Dahlia Ct...The parkway on the north side of Victoria Windrows Loop from the intersection of North and South Victoria Windrows Loop to Dahlia Ct... Ground cover area: 23,082 square feet Turf area: 24,187 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 7 Fiscal Year 2011/12 P96 Hardscape: 6,988 square feet VW-12 The Victoria Park Lane median from the intersection of North and South Victoria Windrows Loop to 390 feet east of Day Creek. The parkway on the north side of Victoria Park Lane from the intersection of North and South Victoria Windrows Loop to 390 feet east of Day Creek. The parkway on the west side of north Victoria Windrows Loop from Silverberry to Victoria Park Lane. The parkway on the south side of Silverberry from 390 feet east of Day Creek to North Victoria Windrows Loop. Ground cover area: 149,010 square feet Turf area: 38,842 square feet Hardscape: 12,868 square feet VW-13 The parkway on the south side of Victoria Park Lane from 390 feet east of Day Creek to South Victoria Windrows Loop. The west side of South Victoria Windrows Loop from Victoria Park Lane to Snapdragon. Ground cover area: 20,066 square feet Turf area: 16,476 square feet Hardscape: 7,200 square feet VW-14 The parkway on the west side of South Victoria Windrows Loop from Snapdragon to Victoria Park Lane. The parkway on the north and south side of Sugargum from South Victoria Windrows Loop to 390 feet east of Day Creek. The parkways on the east and west sides of Basswood from Sugargum to Blazing Star. The parkway on the north side of South Victoria Windrows Loop from Victoria Park Lane to Silktassel. Ground cover area: 21,466 square feet Turt area: 10,335 square feet Hardscape: 27,560 square feet VW-15 The parkway on the north side of Bougainvillea Way from Peach to North Victoria Windrows Loop. The parkway on the east side of North Victoria Windrows Loop from Bougainvillea Way to Citrus. The parkway on the north side of North Victoria Windrows Loop from Locust and following that curb line to Silverberry. The parkway on the north side of Silverberry from North Victoria Windrows Loop 390 feet east of Day Creek. The paseo from North Victoria Windrows Loop at Silverberry to Nasturtium. The paseo from North Victoria Windrows Loop at Locust to Pistachio and continuing to Bougainvillea. Ground cover area: 45,929 square feet Turf area: 12,207 square feet Hardscape: 23,630 square feet VW-16 The south side of Highland from 455 feet east of Day Creek to 534 feet east of Locust. The east and west side of Locust from Highland to North Victoria Windrows Loop. The parkway on the south side of North Victoria Windrows Loop from Citrus east to Bougainvillea Ct... The parkway on the north side of North Victoria Windrows Loop from Twinspur to Locust. Ground cover area: 26,577 square feet Turf area: 23,922 square feet Hardscape: 19,203 square feet VW-17 This site was modified and added to VW-16, 1-5-99. VW-18 The south side of Highland from 12583 Highland to Rockrose. Ground cover area: 2,800 square feet Turt area: 8,515 square feet Hardscape: 3,325 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2011/12 P97 VW-19 The north side of North Victoria Windrows Loop from Rosemary to Rockrose. The east side of Rockrose from North Victoria Windrows Loop to Highland. The south side of Highland from Rockrose to Etiwanda. The horse trail from Highland and Etiwanda to the Fire Station. Ground cover area: 21,027 square feet Turf area: 32,266 square feet Hardscape: 11,298 square feet VW-20 The parkway on the south side of North Victoria Windrows Loop from Victoria Park Lane to Plum. The parkway on the west side of North Victoria Windrows Loop from Plum Way to Rosemary Ct...The paseo from Tipu PI. east to the open field. Note: The area in front of Windrows Park is watered by VW-20 water meter, but is maintained by City crews. Ground cover area: 2,110 square feet Turf area: 16,411 square feet Hardscape: 9,132 square feet VW-21 The east side of North Victoria Windrows Loop from Rosemary Ct. to the trail south of Kalmia St. The trail and paseo from North Victoria Windrows Loop south of Kalmia St. to Etiwanda Ave. and north to the Fire Station. The south side of Basil St. from North Victoria Windrows Loop to Santolina PI.. Ground cover area: 49,187 square feet Turt area: 57,532 square feet Hardscape: 19,600 square feet VW-22 The paseo from North Victoria Windrows Loop at Rockrose to the northeast corner of Windrows Park and from that corner to Plum. Ground cover area: 13,689 square feet Turf area: 19,953 square feet Hardscape: 9,489 square feet VW-23 The west side of Rockrose from Highland to North Victoria Windrows Loop. The parkway on the north side of North Victoria Windrows Loop from Rockrose to Twinspur. The parkway on the south side of North Victoria Windrows Loop from Bougainvillea Ct. to Rosemary. Ground cover area: 18,299 square feet Turf area: 3,425 square feet Hardscape: 10,352 square feet VW-24 The M.W.D. easement from Jasmine and Ironbark to Sweet Gum Dr. Ground cover area: 475 square feet Turf area: 4,730 square feet VW-25 The north side of Baseline from 384 feet west of Wanona to Etiwanda. The west side of Etiwanda from Baseline to Craig. The Baseline median from Swanson PI. to Etiwanda. Ground cover area: 20,934 square feet Turt area: 3,079 square feet Hardscape: 12,799 square feet VW-26 The paseo from Grape to 630 feet west of Grape. Ground cover area 7,021 square feet Hardscape: 8,548 square feet VW-27 The south side of Baseline from 251 feet west of Swanson to Etiwanda. The Baseline median from Victoria Park Lane to Swanson Place. Ground cover area 18,816 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 9 Fiscal Year 2011/12 P98 Hardscape: 17,233 square feet `This site had 2 667 feet of ground cover added due to addition of Baseline median 6-8- 2005. VG-1 The turf and ground cover on the south side of Highland from the Deer Creek Channel to Fairmont. The turt and ground cover from Highland on the west side of Fairmont to Victoria Park Lane. The ground cover on the north side of Victoria Park Lane south of the horse trail from 475 feet east of Milliken to Fairmont. The turt on the north side of Victoria Park Lane from 275 feet east of Milliken to Fairmont. The turt in the parkway on the east side of Fairmont from Victoria Park Lane to Highland. Ground cover area: 21,573 square feet Turf area: 47,604 square feet Hardscape: 17,300 square feet VG-2 The turf on the east side of York from Delaware to Fairmont. The ground cover on the south side of Fairmont from York Place and continuing on that curb line to Victoria Park Lane. The turf and ground cover on the south side of Victoria Park Lane west of Milliken from Fairmont to Milliken. The parkway on the west side of Milliken from Victoria Park Lane to Fairmont. The Milliken median from Fairmont to Victoria Park Lane. The turt on the north side of Victoria Park Lane from 273 feet west of Milliken to Milliken. The ground cover on the north side of Victoria Park Lane south of the horse trail from 468 feet west of Milliken to Milliken. Ground cover area: 29,395 square feet Turf area: 73,608 square feet Hardscape: 20,173 square feet VG-3 The turt and ground cover north of the sidewalk on the north side of Fairmont from Nova Ct. continuing on that curb line to York PI. and the turt south of the sidewalk on the north side of Fairmont from Armstrong PI. continuing on that curb line to York PI...The ground cover on the west side of York PI. from Fairmont to Delaware and the ground cover on the east side of York PI...The turt and ground cover on the west side of Fairmont from Emerson continuing along that curb line to Armstrong PI... The turf and ground cover on the east and west sides of Biola PI. Ground cover area: 57,189 square feet Turt area: 38,343 square feet Hardscape: 26,848 square feet VG-4 The turf and ground cover on the south side of Fairmont from Armstrong to Milliken. The turt and ground cover on the west side of Milliken from Fairmont to the Southern Pacific Railroad. The Milliken median from Fairmont to the Southern Pacific Railroad. The ground cover on the north side of the Southern Pacific Railroad from Deer Creek Channel to Rochester including the paseo to Baylor. The ground cover on the north side of Fairmont from Milliken to Nova Ct... The turt on the north side of Fairmont from Milliken to Armstrong. Ground cover area: 197,763 square feet Turf area: 24,151 square feet Hardscape: 12,278 square feet VG-5 The paseo from Biola at Amarillo to Delaware at York. Ground cover area: 12,448 square feet Turf area: 44,896 square feet Hardscape: 7,992 square feet VGA The paseo beginning at the northeast corner of Victoria Groves Park and Fairmont and extending to the Deer Creek Channel. Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 10 Fiscal Year 2011/12 P99 Ground cover area: 73,442 square feet Turf area: 74,778 square feet Hardscape: 16,629 square feet VG-7 The paseo that begins on the south side of Donnelly at Fairmont and continues to the Deer Creek Channel including the southward extension on the west side of Albright from Donnelly to Pacific and the paseo from Pacific to Charleston. Ground cover area: 43,427 square feet Turf area: 51,765 square feet Hardscape: 15,806 square feet VG-8 The ground cover on the west side of Milliken from 566 feet north of Victoria Park Lane to Victoria Park Lane. The ground cover and turf north of the horse trail on Victoria Park Lane from Milliken to Fairmont. The ground cover on the east side of Fairmont from Victoria Park Lane to 156 feet north of Victoria Park Lane. Ground cover area: 21,614 square feet Turf area: 8,614 square feet Hardscape: 8,281 square feet VG-9 The ground cover on the east side of Fairmont from 156 feet north of Victoria Park Lane to Kenyon Way. The ground cover on the south side of Kenyon from Fairmont to 197 feet east of Fairmont. The turf on the south side of Kenyon from Fairmont to 316 feet east of Fairmont. The turf and ground cover on the south side of Baltimore Dr. from Fairmont to Baltimore Ct... The turf and ground cover on the north side of Baltimore Dr. from Fairmont to Vanderbilt. The turt and ground cover on the east side of Vanderbilt from Baltimore to Brown. The paseo from Vanderbilt and Brown to Kenyon. Ground cover area: 48,481 square feet Turt area: 11,357 square feet Hardscape: 13,542 square feet VG-10 The ground cover on the south side of Kenyon from 197 feet east of Fairmont to Milliken. The turt on the south side of Kenyon from 316 feet east of Fairmont to Milliken. The ground cover on the west side of Milliken from Kenyon to 566 feet north of Victoria Park Lane. The turf and ground cover on the west side of Capitol from Brown to Bethany. The paseo from Capitol and Brown to Kenyon. Ground cover area: 34,241 square feet Turt area: 11,031 square feet Hardscape: 5,320 square feet VG-11 The east and west side parkways and median of Milliken from Baseline to the Southern Pacific Railroad. The north side of Baseline from 542 feet east of Milliken to Milliken. Ground cover area: 31,367 square feet Turf area: 17,264 square feet Hardscape: 25,524 square feet 'This site was reduced on 4-1-2002 by 25,718 sq. ft. of turt and 3,037 sq. ft. of ground cover VG-12 The turf and ground cover on the south side of Fairmont from the southeast corner of Milliken and Fairmont along the curb line to Victoria Park Lane. The turf and ground cover on the west side of Fairmont from the southwest corner of Victoria Park Lane and Fairmont (located east of Milliken) and continuing along the curb line to Milliken. The turf on the east side of Milliken from the Southern Pacific Railroad to 730 feet south of Victoria Park Lane. The ground cover on the east side of Milliken from the Southern Pacific Railroad to 766 feet south of Victoria Park Lane. Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 11 Fiscal Year 2011112 P100 Ground cover area: 53,068 square feet Turf area: 36,431 square feet Hardscape: 27,004 square feet VG-13 The paseos from Victoria Park Lane to Verona, Verona to Napoli,- and Genova to Tivoli. Ground cover area: 17,993 square feet Turf area: 16,344 square feet Hardscape: 8,376 square feet VG-14 The Baseline median from Milliken to Ellena East. The turf and ground cover on the north side of Baseline from Ellena East to Ellena West. The turf and ground cover on the east side of Ellena West from Baseline and following the curb line to Kenyon. The north side of Ellena West from Kenyon to Casoli. The turf and ground cover on both sides of Casoli from Ellena West to Candela. The turf and ground cover on both sides of Crema Place from Ellena west to Candela. Ground cover area: 89,456 square feet Turt area: 62,999 square feet Hardscape: 44,826 square feet VG-15 The turf and ground cover on the west side of Rochester from the Southern Pacific Railroad to Baseline. The turt and ground cover on the north side of Baseline from Rochester to Ellena. East. The Baseline Median from Rochester to Ellena East. The turf and ground cover on the east side of Ellena east from Baseline and continuing along that curb line to 275 feet north of Berra Road. The turf and ground cover on both sides of Berra from Ellena East to Comiso. Ground cover area: 58,588 square feet, Turt area: 57,306 square feet Hardscape: 36,014 square feet VG-16 The paseo from Baseline to Ellena West with entrances to Amelia and Pavola. Ground cover area: 9,661 square feet Turf area: 11,529 square feet Hardscape: 5,804 square feet VG-17 The paseo from Fairmont to the Southern Pacific Railroad. The paseo from Fabriano to Martano. Ground cover area: Turf area: Hardscape: VG-18 The paseo from Ra Ground cover area. Hardscape: 35,351 square feet 40,291 square feet 16,394 square feet ' pallo to Gandino and south to the Southern Pacific Railroad 4,281 square feet 1,308 square feet VG-19 The paseo from Tolentino to Pizolli and to Tolentino. Ground cover area: 12,555 square feet Turf area: 17,856 square feet Hardscape: 7,380 square feet VG-20 The turf on the east side of Milliken from 730 feet south of Victoria Park Lane to Victoria Park Lane. The ground cover on the east side of Milliken from 766 feet south of Victoria Park Lane to Victoria Park Lane. The turf and ground cover on the south side of Victoria Park Lane from the southeast corner at Milliken heading east to Fairmont. The turf and ground cover on the north side of Victoria Park Lane from Parma to the northeast corner of Milliken and Victoria Park Lane. The ground cover on the west side of Parma from Victoria Park Lane to Lomello. The Victoria Park Lane median from Milliken to Pandino Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 12 Fiscal Year 2011/12 P101 Ct...The Milliken median from Victoria Park Lane to 440 feet south of Kenyon. The parkway on the west side of Milliken from 420 feet south of Kenyon to Victoria Park Lane. Ground cover area: 76,232 square feet Turt area: 97,979 square feet Hardscape: 22,177 square feet VG-21 The ground cover on the east side of Parma from Victoria Park Lane to Lomello. The ground cover on the north side of Victoria Park Lane from Parma to 653 feet east of Kenyon. The turt on the north side of Victoria Park Lane from Parma to 547 feet east of Kenyon. The turf and ground cover on the south side of Victoria Park Lane from Fairmont to 422 feet east of Kenyon. The turf and ground cover on the east and west sides of Kenyon from Victoria Park Lane to the Southern Pacific Railroad. The paseo from Kenyon to Rapallo. The paseo from Kenyon to Bari. The Victoria Park Lane median from Pandino Ct. to Portofino Ct... Ground cover area: 69,167 square feet Turf area: 58,692 square feet Hardscape: 34,478 square feet VG-22 The ground cover on the north side of Victoria Park Lane from 653 feet east of Kenyon to Rochester. The turf on the north side of Victoria Park Lane from 547 feet east of Kenyon to Rochester. The Victoria Park Lane median from Portofino Ct. to Rochester Ave... The turt and ground cover on the south side of Victoria Park Lane north of the sidewalk from Kenyon to the east side of Vintage Park. The turt and ground cover on the south side of Victoria Park Lane from the east side of Vintage Park to Rochester. The turf and ground cover on the west side of Rochester from Victoria Park Lane to the Southern Pacific Railroad. Ground cover area: 83,397 square feet Turf area: 89,674 square feet Hardscape: .20,863 square feet VG-23 The turf and ground cover on the east side of Kenyon from Victoria Park Lane to 409 feet west of Grimaldi. The ground cover on the south side of Portofino from Kenyon to Bergano. The turf and ground cover on the north and south side of Lark from Kenyon to the west property line of Rancho Cucamonga High School. The ground cover on the east and west side of Matera from Lark to Pescara. The ground cover on the north and south side of Grimaldi from Kenyon to Brindisi. The turf and ground cover on the west side of Kenyon from Lark to Victoria Park Lane. The ground cover on the north and south side of Marcello from Kenyon to Landriano. The paseo from southwest corner of Kenyon Park to Kenyon. Ground cover area: 63,733 square feet Turt area: 82,565 square feet Hardscape: 39,297 square feet VG-24 The north side of Kenyon from Autumn Glen court to Woodruff. The east side of Woodruff from Kenyon to 403 feet north of Kenyon. Ground cover area: 8,447 square feet Turf area: 5,320 square feet Hardscape: 5,622 square feet VG-25 The paseo west of Torino from Kenyon to Highland. The turt and ground cover on the south side of Highland from the northwest corner of Tract 13440 to the east end of Tract 13440. Ground cover area: 40,800 square feet Turf area: 24,134 square feet Hardscape: 14,353 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 13 Fiscal Year 2011/12 P102 VG-26 The paseo from Brindisi Ct. to Messina. The turf and ground cover on the north side of Brindisi Ct. to the end of the cul-de-sac. The turf and ground cover on the west side of Messina from the paseo to Treviso Way. Ground cover area: 18,905 square feet Turf area: 1,141 square feet Hardscape: 3,615 square feet VG-27 The Milliken median from 440 feet south of Kenyon to Highland. The parkway on the west side of Milliken from 420 feet south of Kenyon. Ground cover area: 4,030 square feet Turf area: 3,006 square feet Hardscape: 4,222 square feet 'Reduced 1,670 square feet of G.C. on 7-1-00 VG-28 The east side of Rochester from Victoria Park Lane to Highland. Ground cover area: 60,902 square feet Hardscape: 5,593 square feet VG-29 The north side of Kenyon from Milliken to Fairmont. The groundcover on the east side of Fairmont, east of the sidewalk, from Kenyon to the 210 freeway. Ground cover area: 20,178 square feet Turf area: 16,877 square feet Hardscape: 5,736 square feet 'Reduction of 18,940 of turf on 7-1-00. Reduction of 5,670 square feet of groundcover on 3-20-03. VG-30 The south side of Tresenda from Santo to Sapada. The paseo from Sapada to Carano. The south side of Montella from Carano to Trivento. Ground cover area: 6,797 square feet Turf area: 2,462 square feet Hardscape: 4,860 square feet VG-31 The east side of Brienza from Larino to Letini. The west side of Tindari from Letini to Larino. The Greenbelt on the south side of Marconi from Trivento to Comisco. The east side of Comisco from Scalea to Santo. Ground cover area: 23,419 square feet Turf area: 18,351 square feet Hardscape: 13,764 square feet VG-32 The north side of Candela from Terini to Bettoloa. Ground cover area: 20,172 square feet Turf area: 8,190 square feet Hardscape: 8,292 square feet VG-33 The paseo at the north end of Sapri to the Southern Pacific Railroad. Ground cover area: 894 square feet Hardscape: 318 square feet VG-34 The paseo at the north end of Bronte to the Southern Pacific Railroad. Ground cover area: 894 square feet Hardscape: 318 square feet VG-35 The east side of Rochester from 555 feet south of Palmi to Victoria Park Lane. The south Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 14 Fiscal Year 2011112 P103 side of Victoria Park Lane and median from Rochester to east side of Deer Creek Channel. Ground cover area: 53,646 square feet Turf area: 11,150 square feet Hardscape: 17,555 square feet VG-36 The north side of Victoria Park Lane from the east side of Deer Creek Channel to Rochester. Ground cover area: 55,780 square feet Turf area: 10,500 square feet Hardscape: 8,004 square feet VG-37 The paseo at the end of Ardmoor Ct. to the Southern Pacific Railroad. Ground cover area: 1,350 square feet Hardscape: 950 square feet VG-38 The east side of Milliken from 106 feet north of Victoria Park Lane to Kenyon. The north and south side of Spring Mist Drive from Milliken to Summerstone. The south side of Kenyon from Milliken to Kenyon Park. Ground cover area: 28,051 square feet Turf area: 4,533 square feet Hardscape: 12,879 square feet VG-39 The north side of Victoria Park Lane from Kenyon paseo to 132 feet east of Milliken. The Kenyon paseo from Victoria Park Lane to Fairwinds Court. The paseo from Victoria Park Lane to the south west corner of Kenyon Park. Ground cover area: 55,089 square feet Turf area: 13,120 square feet . Hardscape: 7,676 square feet VG-40 The south side of Highland from 413 feet west of Highland paseo to Highland paseo. The east side of Highland paseo from Highland to Kenyon. The north side of Kenyon from Highland paseo to Autumn Glen Court. Ground cover area: 56,553 square feet Hardscape: 12,314 square feet VG-41 The west side of Rochester from 294 feet south of Highland to Lark. The north side of Lark from Rochester to 1230 feet west of Rochester. Ground cover area: 31,413 square feet Hardscape: 13,338 square feet VG-42 The south side of Highland from 1314 feet west of Rochester to Rochester. The west side of Rochester from Highland to 294 feet south of Highland. The north side of Highland from Rochester to Woodruff. Ground cover area: 40,346 square feet. Hardscape: 15,445 square feet 'This site originally was 18,464 square feet before the addition of 21,882 square feet to the north side of Highland. VG-43 The north side of Victoria Park Lane and the median from Day Creek Blvd. to Day Creek Channel. The east and west side of Kensington PI. from Victoria Park Lane to Stratford Dr. Ground cover area: 70,669 square feet Turf area: 7,888 square feet Hardscape: 18,426 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 15 Fiscal Year 2011/12 P104 VG-44 The west side of Day Creek Blvd. from 572 feet north of Silverberry to Day Creek Blvd. The south side of Silverberry'from Kensington to Day Creek Blvd. Ground cover area: 36,835 square feet Hardscape: 24,376 square feet VG-45 The west side of Milliken and the Milliken median from the 210 freeway to Kenyon. Ground cover area: 10,658 square feet Turf area: 610 square feet Hardscape: 5,589 square feet VG-46 The Baseline median from 657 feet east of Virginia Dr. to Rochester. The north side of Baseline from 278 feet east of Virginia to Rochester. The paseo from the northeast corner of Rochester and Base Line to Huntley. The east side of Rochester from Baseline to 105 feet north of Shenandoah. Ground cover area: 33,135 square feet Hardscape: 19,340 square feet VG-47 The north side of Baseline from 400 feet east of Day Creek Blvd. to Day Creek Blvd. Baseline median from Day Creek Blvd. to 595 feet east of Day Creek Blvd. Ground cover area: 9,515 square feet. Hardscape: 7,926 square feet 'This site had an addition 6-8-2004 6,272 square feet of ground cover for median. VG-48 The east side of Day Creek Blvd. and median from Baseline to Victoria Park Lane. The south side of Victoria Park Lane from Day Creek Blvd. to 390 feet east of Day Creek Blvd. Ground cover area: 50,318 square feet Turt Area: 3,234 square feet Hardscape: 29,217 square feet VG-49 The north side of Victoria Park Lane and median from 390 feet east of Day Creek Blvd to Day Creek Blvd. The east side of Day Creek Blvd from Victoria Park Lane to Highland. The south side of Highland from Day Creek Blvd. to 440 feet east of Day Creek Blvd. Ground cover area: 51,459 square feet Turf Area: 3,930 square feet Hardscape: 32,296 square feet VG-50 The west side of San Carmela from 389 feet north of Baseline to Baseline. The north side of Baseline from Carmela to 264 feet west of Durness. Ground cover area: 18,043 square feet Hardscape: 12,383 square feet VG-51 The Paseo south of Saxon to Southern Pacific Railroad. Ground cover area: 1,398 square feet Hardscape: 969 square feet VG-52 The north side of Sugar Gum from Milliken to Kensington. The south side of Sugar Gum from Milliken to 111 feet east of Suffolk. Ground cover area: 4,362 square feet Hardscape: 3,325 square feet VG-53 The south side of Victoria Park Lane from 296 feet west of Kensington to Milliken. The west side of Day Creek Blvd. from Victoria Park Lane to 397 feet south of Sugar Gum. Ground cover area: 28,532 square feet Turf Area: 11,070 square feet Hardscape: 7,720 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 16 Fiscal Year 2011/12 P105 VG-54 The east side of Rochester from Shenandoah to the Southern Pacific Railroad. Ground cover area: 6,684 square feet Hardscape: 5,136 square feet VG-55 The paseo north of Westhaven to the Southern Pacific Railroad. Ground cover area: 1,775 square feet Hardscape: 2,575 square feet VG-56 The south side of Highland from 1,317 feet west of Day Creek to 1,085 feet west of Day Creek including the non-irrigated slope on the south side of the sidewalk. Ground cover area: 5,274 square feet Hardscape: 1,761 square feet VG-57 The north side of Highland from Fairmont Way to the Day Creek Channel. Ground cover area: 16,157 square feet Hardscape: 17,405 square feet Map of Improvements The following page shows the map of landscaping improvements, including irrigation sites and community trails, to be maintained using District funds. Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 17 Fiscal Year 2011112 P106 I' ;I_ { `~~ i 1 I ~~• ~~ ;I 1-,. I_~ II _!, I ~ ~ I II.. / `< I! I~ I'. c I;. I I i` ,I i ~a~~ ..I-., I L~11 fv IN 0 z w V w h Q O ~° m~ V _ ~ ~ 0 '~ L d V a J ~~LII r _ N (I i ~.. J. i ••, n: I' rl".:~ Z. I..r ~. 1 _ o;, ~.yi i_) C: ~>K~'~J ,..~..-~ I'I ~;''IP'Ii : I I::- ~ I I~ ~~ i l l I~ ~ 2 ' lA~ af~ S IIII ~JS. '71w•~I'11JJ~1 ; NN ~•\l ...r~~kv ~ > ~~ ~~ N p 1 . ~~.~ O~ ~ jj 9r{ ~ I ~zz21r1 ~ .. I r ~1 y y ' I I II I'~I I 1 ~ ~~~ ~I _I II ~ II, r o ~; ~ II 1-. S II' ~` It ~~ I; IJ I S I I\I O, O\lilZt\ I''I< i0i~~ ~I. III, ~: IIO ~~. ~~'~.'."~~ ' it a [ ,+ I ~'"iw O r I ~ 111 I arl i~ Jr r~ I I i ~~ ~ ; 11 I II!(L 1 I I >I .II II ~0N33i1~AV4 "'' I"`T >` i~l J '~ I :~ .~I m N ~ 1. :'e f~ i i ~ I'I> ~ I c I tt I V >I 11 ~ I I\ loll IIII ' II(Ir I II III: >!I'". I j~l 10~ ~ I ;,r I~~~~ 19 ,rI mil, rooms O ~p n.n I I' C7 ~~y^~l!111 I C7' (7 r ~ I I ~ :Nf~~,.111 rJ 1 U' g I m'.'J .li ~i~ o' F` I I it I~;? i ~ ~~'~~ c~; '-: n 1 1.. nn Gi. P ) I ~1'(Pp~Q~ i I ' ~ \ \ l'lJrl''~'p 'f II ~..~I« i ~IN 'j@ I '.Il O .,,• I N 1 I I i ,«,.'; 1 ,I ~cllta~~ 'Y nl~. S ~r t ~e a I61U'.;I'I d Ili ~: > (' I I Ili' L _.I1:u.1 ~LQ..Ii ...6ilI U a I J.~!.. O"fTitd6'I!, Hr. ~. ;{ X11 p~I, I18 I,~ ~~_~>t, ~ t~° /~ Imo, ~ ~h~4t,~l,~II 1 II I; ~"lr l~'r1 '~I ~'.. .w J i ~~v ' 1 0 I I I I r ~/1 ~S I~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ I 11~ N ~~~~~~ ~~ - ~ I I ' 1 ' ' I I (L ~ 11 I I ~L _ ~ . r ~~ 0 411 I t I IkIlli ~, I I ~ N/ I I 2 iY ~ ~ iI I y` 2 I ~~ ry2 I : I 1 1 '~'E ry 1ff1 ~ I 6y (lll 22 S !~ S Q . I Vii' ff-*i-i r~ r - w Mi IJi I ( r ~ ~' I L(') ~~ ~~ (~ - ~ :, ~JJ I I ~ N II I~ I ~ - ~ I ~ ~ .~ III s ~,~y.~, N I e l I ~I tt ~ II I I v r, ,.I f ~ I ~ o j ~IIi 11~ 1 ~, A~t I . II I rr, ,..-: I I I ~}°~~'~FlFrrl, '~ ,I I Ill ~~ r ~ I III I I 1 r aru.il iu' m 6 i ', -SI 11~:`C~`4~;1I .II:''Illo~ ~IIIII '.Iit:} I I'.1 I I II ''Il ~: li. -r::l ' i~M III Iillr>~ ~l i II ( I l 11~ iI i ili II I! I ~ If ' ~ L i~I II I ~~~ i'1 ~L;n It~^ ~(",~IIpN II ~:. I'll i 'I'.}.I ~ I If IIII I 1~ ,III I :~:1 tI:1 Y1. II 1 I ;,'I i I'.; ~~~~! li' Il}I \jl ~I 1 t.fl f'I~ tIo n' 11B I I I I~I VJ I i ~.L;;, ,~~~ rJrt ~r '~Jv ` ~ f 'e. '~F~? rI ` '~ I. I~ zo i v ~':I , iI , r + I. t D I I .~~a 7 ill i`: i I I 1 ' I ~ FL1 . I~ -, ~ ~ w ~,L~. II IJ~I I' ! .6'II I r I,I 11. ' f I ;III J-I ' ~ ~ ' m - /~V iJ 3}S3H ~021 tI 5'J ~ t I , "'I 1~ II".,'III 114 {, If' I'I lil I I': I ~I ~' y ~ 1 I 'I I A .: I e ~~.i. 1 . '~ ~ ii j ''I I. I rI'I I ~ ^" . l I { I I II ~ " ° ~ ~ I .. w~ 'E ~N S ~ r I' ~ I U € r I' - €E ow °m~5 E N-~ I it tel.'. ~ ev3 r~O~ S ~y I IIb 11 ]'I °~'1~ ~. g c E,o E ~ n3ooDcy, ~ w II II , ! II I nt E d a ~. ~ I 'll > 1 I II~J I p , 1 € r € V' 'I i IIII rtr". - ~ r o q ~E er bm ' ~;1 I IM11- n 93 EEB~ U a I '. II I• is ~~E e~~~ ,:. K I 61 ~ xr { ~ : r v }, E rn a E m~ N E ~~ ~W If ~ ' Ihi 2 0- oro ~ f7 I wow°E_a ~ wm uS m / IQ ~ ! II ') It I I I EE ~ E~ ma. a. ~ ° a ~ 1-if( i ~ } I G I °' S ~ E a °ad m€c E _ ~ C 1 I I I I a Gipe ~ I 11 •-: r~ f ~ a r. ` a ,. ~ ~ F 1 F T Z ., a ~ rn v ~ ~ w ~ v C ~ ~mI IIi C a w ~ ~ U ; I ill' W d z '~ rn o~ 3 0 ~ w • I 1 , ,~ ~, Q J J ¢ ~ ~ ¢ a ~ U ~ w ~ W ~ • ' ' N Y a y W W U O U C7 }{ ' I i _ o F 0 ~ Q Z ~ c ~ U Z ~ W ~ ~; ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ U a a •` ~ LL a I E o 0 l ~ ® 9 6 I e a ~. , '' , , P107 ESTIMATE OF COSTS The estimated costs of administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing the improvements as described in the Plans and Specifications are summarized below. Each year, as part of the assessment district levy calculation process, the costs and expenses are reviewed and the annual costs are projected for the following fiscal year. District Estimated 2011/12 Bud et Personnel Services Regular Payroll $706,010.00 Overtime Salaries 1,090.00 Part-time Salaries 80,320.00 Fringe Benefts 339.100.00 Subtotal Personnel $1,126,520.00 Operations and Maintenance Operations and Maintenance $66,550.00 Vehicle Operations and Maintenance 5,000.00 Contract Services 846,780.00 Tree Maintenance 37,350.00 Utilities Telephone Utilities 1,010.00 Water Utilities 635,400.00 Electric Utilities 79,480.00 Assessment Administration 34,870.00 General Overhead 184 380.00 Subtotal Operations and Maintenance $1,690,820.00 Capital Expenditures Capital Outlav -Vehicles $11,550.00 Subtotal Capital Expenditures $11,550.00 Total District Expenditure Budget $3,028,890.00 Total Estimated Assessment $2,963,200.00 Less Anticipated Delinquencies (210.820.00) Total Estimated Revenues $2,752,380.00 Plus Operating Reserve Fund Contribution 276,510.00 Total Expenditure Budget $3,028,890.00 Total Estimated Assessment $2,963,200.00 Total District EBU Count 7,021.80 Actual Assessment per EBU -Fiscal Year 2011/12 $422.00 Maximum Allowable Assessment er EBU -Fiscal Year 2011/12 $422.00 The maximum allowable assessment per EBU listed in the District budget above, is the amount which was approved in 1996/97 and subsequent District annexations. Each year, prior to the assessments being placed on the tax roll, the City will review the budget and determine the amount needed to Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 -City of Rancho.Cucamonga 18 Fiscal Year 2011 /12 P108 maintain the improvements for the upcoming fiscal year. The actual assessment per EBU will be based on the estimated costs of maintenance, available fund balance and maximum allowable assessment with the goal of maintaining the improvements in a satisfactory and healthy condition. The actual assessment amount may be lower than the maximum allowable assessment; however it may not exceed the maximum unless the increase is approved by the property owners in accordance with Proposition 218. It is the intent of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to maintain an Operating Reserve which shall not exceed the estimated costs of maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or when the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The reserve balance information for the District is as follows: Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2011 Reserve Fund Balance $2,181,650.00 Operating Reserve Contribution -Fiscal Year 2011/12 0.00 Ooerating Reserve Collection -Fiscal Year 2011/12 210.820.00 Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2012 Reserve Fund Balance $1,970,830.00 Definitions of Budget Items The following definitions describe the costs and expenses included in the District Budget: Personnel Services Regular Salaries: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all full-time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Part Time Salaries: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all part time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Fringe Benefits: This item includes the benefits available to City employees: health care, vacation, sick time, and retirement fund. Operations and Maintenance Contract Services: This item includes the contract costs of a landscape maintenance company responsible for the ongoing maintenance of the District improvements. Tree Maintenance: This item includes the contract costs attributed to maintaining the street trees and other trees throughout the District. Utilities -Water: This item includes the costs to furnish water for the landscaping within the District. Utilities -Electric: This item includes the costs to furnish electricity required for the operation and maintenance of the sprinklers and irrigation controllers. Assessment Administration: This item includes the cost to all particular departments and staff of the City, and consultants for providing the administration, coordination and management of District services, operations, and incidental expenses related to the District. This item also includes creation of an annual engineer's report, resolutions and placing the assessment amounts onto the County tax Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 19 Fiscal Year 2011112 P109 roll each year, along with responding to any public inquiries and future Proposition 218 balloting proceedings. General Overhead: This item includes the costs of all departments and staff of the City for providing the coordination of District services, inspections, annual bid management, responding to public concerns, public education, accounting, auditing and procedural matters associated with the District. This item also includes an allocation for general City staff time for administrative functions and systems that provide for a functional and operational assessment district within the City's administrative structure. Capital Expenditures: Capital Projects: This item includes new improvements to further enhance the level and quality of service provided within the boundaries of the District. This may include new monuments, irrigation systems, and other large improvements. Operating Reserve Collection: Operatino Reserve Collection: This item includes the amount to be collected to maintain reserves to enable the City to pay for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or whenever the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The Reserve Fund contribution will continue until such a time the Reserve Fund balance is approximately one half of the annual costs. The fund may be allowed to accumulate in anticipation of any unforeseen expenses not included in the yearly maintenance costs. This may include, but is not limited to, tree replacements, repair of damaged equipment due to vandalism, storms and other similar events. Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 20 Fiscal Year 2011/12 P110 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT General Pursuant to the 1972 Act and Article XIII D, all parcels that have a special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements and services shall be identified, and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel shall be determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of improvements. The 1972 Act, permits the establishment of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include the operation, maintenance and servicing of landscaping improvements. Section 22573 of the 1972 Act requires that maintenance assessments must be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. This Section states: "The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district maybe apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements." The determination of whether or not a lot or parcel will benefit from the improvements shall be made pursuant to the Improvement Act of 1911 (Division 7 (commencing with Section 5000) (of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California)." The 1972 Act also permits the designation of zones of benefit within any individual assessment district if "by reasons or variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive different degrees of benefit from the improvement" (Sec. 22547). Article XIII D, Section 4(a) of the California Constitution limits the amount of any assessment to the proportional special benefit conferred on the property. Article XIII D also provides that publicly owned properties must be assessed unless there is clear and convincing evidence that those properties receive no special benefit from the assessment. Exempted from the assessment would be the areas of public streets, public avenues, public lanes, public roads, public drives, public courts, public alleys, public easements and rights-of-ways, public greenbelts and public parkways. The net amount to be assessed may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels. Proposition 218, approved by the voters in November 1996, requires the City to separate general benefit from special benefit, where only special benefit is assessed. Benefit The maintenance and servicing of the improvements within the District (which are described in the Description of Improvements and Services Section of this report) are for the benefit of the properties within the District, and as such confer a special and direct benefit to parcels within the District by: • improving the livability, appearance, and desirability for properties within the boundaries of the District, and • ensuring that improvements do not reach a state of deterioration or disrepair so as to be materially detrimental to properties within the District, and Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 21 Fiscal Year 2011/12 P111 • providing beautification, shade and overall enhancement to properties within the District. The above mentioned items affect the assessed property in a way that is particular and distinct from their effect on other parcels and that real property in general and the public at large do not share. They contribute to a specific enhancement of the properties within the District. Since these improvements, including the community trails, were installed and are maintained specifically for the properties within the District; only properties within the District receive a special benefit and are assessed for said maintenance. General Benefit In addition to the special benefits received by parcels within the District, there are derivative general benefits that are conferred on parcels outside the boundaries of the District which include: • the control of dust and insect infestations, and • the visual enhancement of the area to persons or vehicles that may travel through the District. However it has been determined that these benefits are derivative and do not provide a direct benefit to parcels outside of the district that are not being assessed. Method of Assessment Spread Each of the parcels within the District is deemed to receive special benefit from the improvements. Each parcel that has a special benefit conferred upon it as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements are identified and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel is determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of the improvements. When the District was formed in 1984, Article XIII D and Proposition 218 had not yet been passed. Upon the passage of Article XIII D and the subsequent passage of the Proposition Omnibus Implementation Act, new rules were put into place. Due to the changes in legal requirements, as property annexed to the District after the passage of the Assessment Law, the description of the method of assessment became more refined, however, the assessment per parcel has remained the same since the 1996/97 Fiscal Year. Further, no parcel included in the District formation or annexations prior to when the language was refined, are now being levied differently than they were at the time the District was formed or the parcels were annexed. To assess special benefit appropriately, it is necessary to relate the different type of parcel improvements to each other. The Equivalent Benefit Unit ("EBU") method of apportionment uses the single family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single family home equals one Equivalent Benefit Unit (EBU). Every other land-use is converted to EBUs based on an assessment formula that equates to the property's specific development status, type of development (land-use), and size of the property, as compared to a single family home. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land-use types, as assigned by County use code, to determine each parcel's EBU assignment. Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 22 Fiscal Year 2011/12 P112 Land-Use Equivalent Dwelling Units Pro ert T e Coun Use Code EBU Value Multi tier Single Family Residential 1.00 Dwelling Unit Condominium 1.00 Dwelling Unit Multi -Family 1.00 Dwelling Unit Commercial/ Industrial 2.00 Acre Vacant (incl. all undeveloped property) 0.25 Acre The use of the latest County Assessor's Secured Roll shall be the basis for the Property Type determination and units/acreage assignments, unless better data is available to the City. In addition, if any parcel within the District is identified by the County Auditor/Controller to be an invalid parcel number for the current fiscal year, the Property Type and EBU assignment shall be based on the correct parcel number and/or new parcel number(s) County use code and subsequent property information. If a single parcel has changed to multiple parcels, the EBU assignment and assessment amount applied to each of the new parcels will be recalculated rather than spread the proportionate share of the original assessment. The following table summarizes the Fiscal Year 2011/12 maximum allowable assessment rates for the District: Property Type (County Use Code) Maximum Allowable Assessment Rate er EBU Actual Assessment Rate per EBU Total UnitslAcres Total EBUs Single Family Residential $422.00 $422.00 6,322.00 6,322.00 Multi-family $422.00 $422.00 589.00 589.00 Commercial/Industrial $422.00 $422.00 52.73 105.46 Vacant $422.00 $422.00 21.36 5.34 The total amount of maintenance and incidental costs for maintaining the landscaping and community trail improvements is assessed to the individual parcels of real property within the District in proportion to the special benefit received by such parcels of real property. The proposed individual assessments are shown on the assessment roll in this report. Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 23 Fiscal Year 2011/12 P113 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM An Assessment Diagram for the District is shown on the following page. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the County Assessor of the County San Bernardino, at the time this report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Engineer's Report. Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 24 Fiscal Year 2011/12 P114 N N °' ~ ~~ V .~ ~, •,~„ _~ ,y a' J o 0 ~ : ~ ~ ~ ~, ! ~ ~ ~ '' ~ - ny /~Jay~ ~ ~:r ~ ~ k~ ._ ._.._.._.._ -o J ti.. o j ~ 0_' in J Npp C ~ ~ N ^` N J m ~ O W I a~ .1.r ~ ~ L 3 m o 0 •= i ~ Q` j ._.._.._.._..~.._.._.._.._.._• ® i nV lse3 in 1 L Q~ ~ 1 _.._.._ V' Q i nt/ epuenn!;3` ~ ~ ny epuenn!;3 ~C ! ~ a V ! i y j - - '118 ~aaJ~ !ep ~,, ~ i _ I ._.._.._.._.._.._.._.y ~ ll I jC n Ja;sa oo !- --1J~- V 4 2i -- it j ny Ja;sayooa J i • ~'~ 1 ~ i ~----- ' ny ua~!II!W r._.._.._.._.._ _--- I i ~, ~ ! ny ua~!il!W i ~ ~i j j ~ i j i \ `` ~, ~ i n uane --~'--I ---- -- -- -jny uaneH d H j i ~. ! -- 1 j _ -- ---.J._..- _.-.. ~_--1 ny esowJaH i- ---- -- ~ .ny esowJaH i i i _ _ i nH PIe4!yoJH ~ ~ j i I - jnH pleQ!yoJH ~ ~ i 1 ny uewllaH i -T~----I-- - - ~ i ~.r' ~ ny uewllaH j '" ~ r L ~ ! I ~ ~ ! nV P elau!/~ ! ' ~ i 1S uepawe~ j -~--- - -~-- '~'1 _ ~ ! §y•n ELY€°~~`~ f,` ~ _ _ 1 ads Es Ex `€' t.._.._ ~ .._:~•Y. ..___ - _e ny anOJ~ , gs`=fi$E~eEe ~ ~ ~ m LL npq~5=s 5'an ~,e ~_ C ~Ey ~s `sag~q;~i N m st~6,~°OE~-a _ a¢~E~p e g€€ ! €~ _ g44yEg~g;asa oc A€g~9°ge~pF~s~ 'z~ fla=r s:z F4~ ~k~:aY@.o's:E P115 ASSESSMENT ROLL Assessment Roll The assessment roll is a listing of the assessment for Fiscal Year 2011/12 apportioned to each lot or parcel, as shown on the last equalized roll of the Assessor of the County of San Bernardino. The following tables summarize the Fiscal Year 2011/12 maximum and actual assessments for the District: Property Type Count Use Code Maximum Allowable Assessment Rate er EBU Total UnitslAcres Total EBUs Maximum Allowable Assessment Single Family Residential $422.00 6,322.00 6,322.00 $2,667,884.00 Mulli-family $422.00 589.00 589.00 $248,558.00 Commercial/Industrial $422.00 52.73 105.46 $44,504.12 Vacant $422.00 21.36 5.34 $2.253.48 Property Type Coun Use Code Actual Assessment Rate er EBU Total Units/Acres Total EBUs Actual Assessment Single Family Residential $422.00 6,322.00 6,322.00 $2,667,884.00 Multi-family $422.00 589.00 589.00 $248,558.00 Commercial/Industrial $422.00 52.73 105.46 $44,504.12 Vacant $422.00 21.36 5.34 $2.253.48 A copy of the full assessment roll is available for review in the City Clerk's office. Annexations There were no annexations effective for the 2011/12 Fiscal Year: Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 25 Fiscal Year 2011112 This Staff Report replaces Agenda pages P76 through P115. STAFF REPORT ADMINIS"I'R~ITIVE SERVICES DEPARTMENT Date: August 3, 2011 To: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager -r From: John R. Gillison, Assistant City Ma age By: Ingrid Y. Bruce, GIS/Special Districts Manager RANCxo CUCAMONGA Subject: CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF RESOLUTIONS INITIATING PROCEEDINGS TO LEW ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS, PRELIMINARILY APPROVE THE ANNUAL ENGINEER'S REPORT, DECLARING THE CITY COUNCIL'S INTENTION TO LEW ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS WITHIN LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2011/12 AND SETTING THE TIME AND PLACE FOR A PUBLIC HEARING THEREON. NO INCREASE OF ASSESSMENT RATE FOR FY 2011/12 IS PROPOSED. It is recommended that the City Council approve the Resolutions initiating the proceedings to levy annual assessments, preliminarily approve the annual engineer's report, declaring the City Council's intention to levy annual assessments within Landscape Maintenance District No. 2. There is no increase to the current rates in this district proposed for Fiscal Year 2011/2012. The Engineer's Report is on file in the City Clerk's Office. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS This year, the City will place on the County Tax Roll Landscape Maintenance District No. 2; the assessments received for this District are utilized for the maintenance and operation of park and landscaping facilities therein. Said maintenance and operation include, but is not limited to turf, ground cover, planter beds, shrubs, plants and trees, landscape lighting, irrigation systems, electrical energy for irrigation controllers, insect/disease control, graffiti removal, hardscapes, entry signs, sound walls and all associated appurtenant facilities. The Fiscal Year 2011/2012 budget is $3,028,890.00. Assessment revenues including delinquencies are estimated at $2,752,380.00. The difference of $276,820.00 will be made up using LMD 2 operating reserves bringing the balance down to $ 1,970,830.00. With the July 20, 2011 failure of Prop 218 Assessment Ballot increase, the assessment rates must remain unchanged from the previous fiscal year 2010/2011 rates. A subsequent report will provide supplementary recommendations to the City Council regarding potential maintenance level adjustments to stay within budget revenues. The assessment rates and district description for the Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 is as follows: Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 assessments pay for the on-going maintenance of parkways, paseos and parks within the Victoria Planned Community. The current assessment rate is $422.00 per single-family residence. The commercial rate is $844.00 per acre, and the vacant rate is $105.50 per acre. Incorrect header. CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF RESOLUTIONS DECLARING THE CITY COUNCIL'S PACs. 2 INTF_N1'JON TO LEVY ANNUAL ASSFSSMENTS WITHIN LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO'S 1, 3A, 3B, 4R, 5, fi-R, 7, 8, 9 AND 10 FOR FISCAL YEAR 201 i /12 AND SETTING THE "TIME AND PLACE FOR A PUBL]C HEARING THEREON. Attachments Resolutions Engineer's Report Item L8. Approval of Resolutions initiating proceedings to levy annual assessments, preliminarily approve the annual Engineer's Report, declaring the City Council's intention to levy annual assessments within Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 for Fiscal Year 2011112 and setting the time and place for a public hearing thereon. NO INCREASE OF ASSESSMENT RATE FOR FY 2011/12 IS PROPOSED. RESOLUTION NOs. 11-134, 11-135 and 11-136 RESOLUTION NO. ~ I.3~ RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE PREPARATION OF ANNUAL ENGINEER'S REPORT PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE ASSESSMENT LAW FOR PROCEEDINGS FOR THE ANNUAL ASSESSMENT LEVY WITHIN LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2011/12 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, previously undertaken proceedings to form and has formed certain maintenance districts pursuant to pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California (commencing with Section 22500) (the "1972 Act"), known and designated as Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 (a "District"); and WHEREAS, at this time the City Council desires to initiate proceedings pursuant to Chapter 3 of the 1972 Act to provide for the annual levy of assessments for the next ensuing fiscal year to provide for the annual costs for maintenance and servicing of improvements within the District; and WHEREAS, the proceedings for the annual levy of assessments shall relate to the fiscal year commencing July 1, 2011, and ending June 30, 2012 ("Fiscal Year 2011/12"). NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, DETERMINED AND ORDERED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, as follows: SECTION 1. Recitals. The above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2. New Improvements or Substantial Changes in Existing Improvements. No new improvements are proposed to be added to the improvements to be maintained or serviced and no substantial changes in the existing improvements are proposed to be made for Fiscal Year 2011/12. SECTION 3. Annual Engineer's Report. The City Engineer is hereby ordered to prepare and file with this City Council an Annual Engineer's Report for the District relating to such annual assessment and levy in such District in accordance with the provisions of 1972 Act, Article XIIID of the Constitution of the State of California ("Article XIIID") and the Proposition 218 Omnibus Implementation Act (Government Code Section 53750 and following) (the "Implementation Act") (the 1972 Act, Article XIIID and the Implementation Act are referred to collectively as the "Assessment Law"). SECTION 4. Filing of the Annual Engineer's Report. Upon completion, the Annual Engineer's Report for the District shall be filed with the City Clerk, who shall then submit the same to this City Council for its consideration pursuant to the Assessment Law. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this day of August, 2011. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: ATTEST: L. Dennis Michael, Mayor Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk I, Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was. duly passed, approved and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of said City Council held on 2011. Executed this , at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk RESOLUTION NO. ~/-/,3,j RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, PRELIMINARILY APPROVING THE ANNUAL ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR THE ANNUAL LEVY OF ASSESSMENTS WITHIN LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS NO. 2 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2011/12 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, pursuant to the provisions of Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California (the "1972 Act"), Article XIIID of the Constitution of the State of California ("Article XIIID") and the Proposition 218 Omnibus Implementation Act (Government Code Section 53750 and following) (the "Implementation Act") (the 1972 Act, Article XIIID and the Implementation Act are referred to collectively as the "Assessment Law"), did, by previous Resolution, order the preparation of a report for the annual levy of assessments for Fiscal Year 2011/2012 ("Annual Engineer's Report") in maintenance assessment district known and designated as Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 (a "District"); and WHEREAS, there has now been presented to this City Council a separate Annual Engineer's Report for the District as required by the Assessment Law and as previously directed by Resolution; and WHEREAS, this City Council has now examined and reviewed the Annual Engineer's Report as presented, and is satisfied with each and all of the items and documents as set forth in such report, and is satisfied that the assessments on a preliminary basis, have been spread within the District in accordance with the special benefits received from the improvements to be maintained and serviced, as set forth in the applicable Annual Engineer's Report. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, DETERMINED AND ORDERED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, as follows: SECTION 1. Recitals. The above recitals are all true and correct SECTION 2. Annual Engineer's Report. The Annual Engineer Report for the District as presented, consisting of the following: A. Plans and specifications describing the general nature, location and extent of the improvements to be maintained and serviced and the extent of such maintenance; B. An estimate of the cost of the maintenance of the improvements for the District for Fiscal Year 2011/12; C. A diagram for such District, showing the area and properties proposed to be assessed; and D. An annual assessment for Fiscal Year 2011/2012 of the estimated costs of the maintenance and servicing of those improvements to be maintained and serviced during such Fiscal Year, assessing the net amount upon all assessable lots and/or parcels within such District in proportion to the special benefits received is hereby approved on a preliminary basis and is ordered to be filed in the Office of the City Clerk as a permanent record and to remain open for public inspection. SECTION 3. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Resolution, and the minutes of this meeting shall so reflect the presentation of the Annual Levy Reports. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this day of August 2011. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: L. Dennis Michael, Mayor ATTEST: Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk I, Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of said City Council held on 2011. Executed this , at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk RESOLUTION NO. I~~~3 l/O RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO PROVIDE FOR THE ANNUAL LEVY AND COLLECTION OF ASSESSMENTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2011/2012 IN LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 AND SETTING A TIME AND PLACE FOR A PUBLIC HEARING THEREON WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has previously formed certain maintenance districts and authorized the levy of assessments therein pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972," being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California (commencing with Section 22500) (the "1972 Act") in what are known and designated as Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 (a "District"); and WHEREAS, this City Council has initiated proceedings to provide for the annual levy of assessments for Fiscal Year 2011/12, to finance the costs and expenses necessary for continued maintenance and servicing of improvements within the District; and WHEREAS, at this time, there has been presented and preliminarily approved by this City Council, a report for each District identified by the distinctive designation of the District and entitled "Fiscal Year 2011/12 Annual Engineer's Report" ("Annual Engineer's Report") as required pursuant to Article 4 of Chapter 1 of the 1972 Act, Article XIIID of the Constitution of the State of California ("Article XIIID") and the Proposition 218 Omnibus Implementation Act (Government Code Section 53750 and following) (the "Implementation Act") (the 1972 Act, Article XIIID and the Implementation Act are referred to collectively as the "Assessment Law"), and this City Council desires to conduct the proceedings to authorize the levy of the annual assessments within each District; and WHEREAS, the annual assessments for Fiscal Year 2011/12 proposed to be levied within the District as set forth in the applicable report do not exceed the annual assessments as previously authorized to be levied within the District and, therefore, the proposed levy of assessments for Fiscal Year 2011/2012 within the District are not deemed to be "increased" over the maximum authorized annual assessments. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, DETERMINED AND ORDERED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, as follows: SECTION 1. Recitals. The above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2. Improvements and Maintenance and Servicing Thereof. The public interest and convenience requires, and it is the intention of this City Council, to undertake proceedings for the annual levy and collection of assessments within the District for the continual maintenance and servicing of the improvements authorized to be maintained and serviced within the District. The improvements include, but are not limited to, turf, ground cover, planter beds, shrubs, plants and trees, landscape lighting, irrigation systems, electrical energy for irrigation controllers, hardscapes, entry signs, sound walls, and all associated appurtenant facilities. A description of the specific improvements to be maintained and serviced within the District is set forth in Appendix A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. "Maintenance" may include the furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operation, and servicing of any improvement, including: (a) repair, removal, or replacement of all or any part of any improvement; (b) providing for the life, growth, health, and beauty of landscaping, including cultivation, irrigation, trimming, spraying, fertilizing, or treating for disease or injury; (c) the removal of trimmings, rubbish, debris, and other solid waste; (d) the cleaning, sandblasting, and painting of walls and other improvements to remove or cover graffiti. "Service" may include the furnishing of: (a) electric current or energy, gas, or other illuminating agent for the lighting or operation of any improvements; and, (b) water for the irrigation of any landscaping, the operation of any fountains, or the maintenance of any other improvements. Reference is made to the Annual Engineer's Report for further information regarding the improvements to be maintained and serviced for the District and the scope of such maintenance and service. SECTION 3. Annual Engineer's Report. The Annual Engineer's Report regarding the annual levy for the District for Fiscal Year 2011/2012 have been previously approved and directed to be filed in the Office the City Clerk. Reference is made to the report for the District for a full and detailed description of the improvements to be maintained and serviced, the boundaries of the District and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the District. SECTION 4. Assessment. The public interest and convenience requires, and it is the intention of this City Council to order the annual levy of assessments for the District as set forth and described in the Annual Engineer's Report, and further it is determined to be in the best public interest and convenience to levy and collect annual assessments to pay the costs and expenses of such maintenance and service as estimated in such Annual Engineer's Report. SECTION 5. Boundaries of Districts. The proposed maintenance and service work as described in the Annual Engineer's Report for the District is, in the opinion of this City Council, of special benefit to the properties within the boundaries of the District, and this City Council makes the costs and expenses of such maintenance and service chargeable upon such District, which District said City Council hereby declares to be the District specially benefited by such maintenance and service, and to be further assessed pursuant to the Assessment Law to pay the costs and expenses thereof. The District shall include each and every parcel of land within the boundaries thereof; as such District is shown on a map as approved by this City Council and on file in the Office of the City Clerk, and so designated by the name of such District. SECTION 6. Public Hearing. Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held the 17th day of August, 2011, at the hour of 7:00 o'clock p.m. or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard, in the regular meeting of the City Council, being in the Council Chambers located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California, which is the time and place fixed by this City Council for the hearing of protests or objections in reference to the annual levy of assessments, to the extent of the maintenance, by any interested person and any other matters contained in this resolution. Any persons who wish to object to the proceedings for the annual levy should file a written protest with the City Clerk prior to the time set and scheduled for said public hearing. SECTION 7. For Information Regarding Proceedings. For any and all information relating to the proceedings, protest procedure, any documentation and/or information of a procedural or technical nature, your attention is directed to the below listed person at the City: Ingrid Bruce GIS/Special Districts Manager City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 (909) 477-2700, Ext 2575 SECTION 8. Notice. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to publish, pursuant to Government Code Section 6061, a copy of this Resolution in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin, a newspaper of general circulation within said City, said publication shall be made one time and not less than ten (10) days before the date set for the Public Hearing. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this day of August, 2011. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: L. Dennis Michael, Mayor ATTEST: Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk I, Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of said City Council held on 2011. Executed this , at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk Appendix A Descriptions of Improvements This Appendix A contains general descriptions of the improvements to be maintained and serviced within the District. Please refer to the Annual Engineer's Report for a full and complete description of the maintenance and service to be provided for the District. Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 Landscaping: Parkways (includes turf and ground cover) Median Islands (includes turf and ground cover) Paseos Street Trees Community Trails Parks: (Parks within LMD No. 2 include: Kenyon Park, Windrows Park, Ellena Park, Vintage Park, Victoria Groves Park and Victoria Arbors Park) A-1 Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2011/2012 City of Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 (Caryn Planned Community) CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.6 (CARYN PLANNED COMMUNITY) 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Phone: 909.477.2700 Fax: 909.477.2741 CITY COUNCIL L. Dennis Michael, Mayor Sam Spagnolo, Mayor Pro Tem William Alexander, Council Member Chuck Buquet, Council Member Diane Williams, Council Member CITY STAFF John R. Gillison, Assistant City Manager Linda D. Daniels, Deputy City Manager William Wittkopf, Public Works Director Ingrid Y. Bruce, GIS/Special Districts Manager Christopher Bopko, Management Analyst III TABLE OF CONTENTS ENGINEER'S LETTER INTRODUCTION 1 3 Reason for Assessment .............................................................................................3 Process for Annual Assessment .................................................................................3 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS 5 Description of the Boundaries of the District ...............................................................5 Description of Improvements and Services ................................................................5 Map of Improvements ...............................................................................................17 ESTIMATE OF COSTS 18 District Budget ..........................................................................................................18 Definitions of Budget Items .......................................................................................19 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT 21 General .....................................................................................................................21 Special Benefit .........................................................................................................21 General Benefit ........................................................................................................22 Method of Assessment Spread ................................................................................22 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM ASSESSMENT ROLL 24 25 Assessment Roll .......................................................................................................25 Annexations ..............................................................................................................25 ENGINEER'S LETTER WHEREAS, on ,the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga (the "City"), under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 (the "1972 Act") adopted its Resolution No. _, a Resolution Initiating Proceedings for the Levy of Annual Assessments for Landscape Maintenance District No. 6 (Caryn Planned Community) (the "District"); and WHEREAS, the Resolution Initiating Proceedings directed staff to prepare and file an Engineer's Report for Fiscal Year 2011/12 pursuant to the requirements of the 1972 Act. The Engineer's Report presents the plans and specifications describing the general nature, location and extent of the improvements to be maintained, an estimate of the costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements for the District for the referenced fiscal year, a diagram for the District, showing the area and properties proposed to be assessed, and an assessment of the estimated costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing the improvements, assessing the net amount upon all assessable lots and/or parcels within the District in proportion to the special benefit received; and NOW THEREFORE, the following assessment is proposed to be authorized in order to pay the estimated costs of maintenance, operation and servicing of the improvements to be paid by the assessable real property within the boundaries of the District in proportion to the special benefit received. The following table summarizes the proposed assessment. SUMMARY OF ASSESSMENT Fiscal Year 2011112 Total Estimated Assessment $2,963,200.00 Less Anticipated"Delinquencies 210 820.00 Total Estimated Revenue $2,752,380..00 Plus Reserve Fund Contribution 276.510.00 Total Expenditure Budget $3,028,890.00 Total District EBU Count 6,574.05 Actual Assessment per EBU $422.00 Maximum Allowable Assessment per EBU $422.00 In making the assessments contained herein pursuant to the 1972 Act: I have identified all parcels which will have a special benefit conferred upon them from the improvements described in the Special Benefit Section of this Engineer's Report (the "Specially Benefited Parcels"). For particulars as to the identification of said parcefs, reference is made to the Assessment Diagram, a copy of which is included in this Engineer's Report. 2. I have evaluated the costs and expenses of the improvements upon the Specially Benefited Parcels. In making such evaluation: Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2011/12 a. The proportionate special benefit derived by each Specially Benefited Parcel from the improvements was determined in relationship to the entirety of the maintenance costs of the improvements; b. No assessment has been imposed on any Specially Benefited Parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on such parcel from the improvements; and c. Any general benefits from the improvements have been separated from the special benefits and only special benefits have been assessed. I, the undersigned, respectfully submit the enclosed Engineer's Report and, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, the Engineer's Report, Assessments, and the Assessment Diagram herein have been prepared and computed in accordance with the order of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Assessment Law. A. Steu erector of Engineering Services/City Engineer Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2011112 INTRODUCTION Reason for Assessment Approval of the assessment covered by this Engineer's Report will generate the revenue necessary to: Provide for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements described in this Engineer's Report. Maintenance may include but is not limited to, all of the following: the repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement, providing for the life, growth, health and beauty of the landscaping, including cultivation, irrigation, trimming, spraying, fertilizing or treating for disease or injury, the removal of trimming, rubbish, debris and other solid waste, the maintenance, repair and replacement as necessary of all irrigation systems and the removal of graffiti from walls immediately adjacent to the cultivated areas. Servicing means the furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operating and servicing of any improvement. Servicing shall also include vehicle, equipment, capital improvements and administrative costs associated with the annual administration and operation of the District. Process for Annual Assessment The City cannot levy and collect annual assessments within the District without complying with the procedures specified in the 1972 Act. On an annual basis, an Engineer's Report must be prepared which contains a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the district. The City Council must also adopt a resolution of intention which: • Declares the intention of the City Council to levy and collect assessments within the assessment district for the fiscal year stated therein. • Generally describes the existing and proposed improvements and any substantial changes proposed to be made in existing improvements. • Refers to the assessment district by its distinctive designation and indicate the general location of the district. • Refers to the report of the engineer, on file with the clerk, for a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the district. • Gives notice of the time and place for public hearing by the City Council on the levy of the proposed assessment. • States whether the assessment is proposed to increase from the previous year. If the assessments are to be levied in the same or lesser amounts than the maximum assessment amount approved, the clerk shall give notice by causing the resolution of intention to be published. Any interested person may, prior to the conclusion of the public hearing, file a written protest which shall state all grounds of objection. The protest shall contain a description sufficient to identify the property owned by the property owner filing the protest. During the course or upon conclusion of the hearing, the City Council may order changes in any of the matters provided in the report, including changes in the improvements, any zones within the assessment district, and the proposed diagram or the proposed assessment. The City Council, upon conclusion of the public hearing must then adopt a resolution confirming the diagram and assessment, either as originally proposed or as changed by it. The adoption of the resolution shall constitute the levy of an assessment for the fiscal year referred to in the assessment. Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2011/12 If the assessment to be levied exceeds the maximum assessment amount previously approved, the City must comply with the procedures specified in Article XIII D and Proposition 218. The voters in the State of California in November 1996 added Article XIII D to the California Constitution imposing, among other requirements, the necessity for the City to conduct an assessment ballot procedure to enable the owners of each property on which assessments are proposed to be enacted or increased, the opportunity to express their support for, or opposition to the proposed assessment or increase in such assessment. The basic steps of the assessment ballot procedure are outlined below. The City must prepare a Notice of Public Hearing ("Notice"), which describes, along with other mandated information, the reason for the proposed assessments, and to provide a date and time of a public hearing to be held on the matter. The City must also prepare an assessment ballot, which clearly gives the property owner the ability to sign and mark their assessment ballot either in favor of, or in opposition to the proposed assessment. The Notice and assessment ballot are mailed to each affected property owner within the District a minimum of 45 days prior to the public hearing date as shown in the Notice. The City may also hold community meetings with the property owners to discuss the issues facing the District and to answer property owner questions directly. After the Notice and assessment ballot are mailed, property owners are given until the close of the public hearing, stated in the Notice, to return their signed and marked assessment ballot. During the public hearing, property owners are given the opportunity to address the City Council and ask questions or voice their concerns. At the public hearing, the returned assessment ballots received prior to the close of the public hearing are tabulated, weighted by the proposed assessment amount on each property and the results are announced by the City Council. Article XIII D provides that if, as a result of the assessment ballot proceeding, a majority protest is found to exist, the City Council shall not have the authority to levy and collect the assessments as proposed. A majority protest exists if the assessments represented by ballots submitted in opposition exceed those submitted in favor of the assessment. All returned ballots are tabulated and weighted according to the financial obligation of each particular parcel. If there is no majority protest as described above, the City Council may approve the proposed assessments. If there is a majority protest, as described above, the City will not levy and collect any assessments. Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2011/12 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS The District provides for the administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing of various improvements located within the public right-of-way and dedicated easements within the boundaries of the District. Description of the Boundaries of the District The District is located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The boundaries of the District are generally described as that area located south of the I-210 Freeway, west of Etiwanda Avenue, southwest of the 1-15 Freeway and east of Haven Avenue, also known as the Victoria Planned Community, and are more particularly in the diagram of the District included herein. Reference is also made to the Assessment Diagram included in this Report. Description of Improvements and Services The improvements maintained by the District include the parkways, median islands, street trees, paseos, community trails and parks within the Victoria Planned Community and as such are of direct and special benefit to the parcels within that community. These improvements are located within the street public right-of-ways and dedicated public easements which are within the boundaries of the District. The landscaping maintenance includes, but is not limited to, turf, ground cover, shrubs and trees, sprinkler and irrigation systems, drainage systems, masonry walls, entryway monument, and associated appurtenances. Services include personnel, materials, contracting services, utilities, capital projects and all necessary costs associated with the maintenance, replacement and repair required to keep the improvements in a healthy, vigorous and satisfactory condition. Park lighting as well as lighting along the paseos/walkways is also included. In addition, it is the City's intention to continue to use cost effective materials, including the future ability to replace landscaping with drought resistant or low water use plants, in order to lower expenses of the District. The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows: Parks: Kenyon Park, Windrows Park, Ellena Park, Vintage Park, Victoria Groves Park and Victoria Arbors Park. The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows: Site # Descriptive Location 2-1 The west side of Arbor Lane from the traffic circle to Church. The Arbor Lane median from Church to the traffic circle. The east side of Arbor Lane from Long Meadow to Church. The paseo from the west side of Arbor Lane to Day Creek Blvd. The paseo from the west side of Arbor Lane to Saintsbury. The north side of Winery Drive from Arbor Lane to 214 feet west of Arbor Lane. The south side of Long Meadow Drive from Freestone Court to Duck Creek Place. Ground cover area: 93,639 square feet Hardscape: 59,041 square feet 2-2 The northwest corner of Day Creek Blvd. and Church. The north side of Church from Day Creek Blvd. to 1,152 feet west of Hess. The paseo from the north side of Church to Dry Creek Drive. The paseo from the north side of Church to Pine Ridge PI. The west side of Hess Place from the north side of Church to Dry Creek Drive. The south side of Church from 145 feet east of Hyssop to 896 feet east of Hyssop. Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2011/12 • Ground cover area: 24,018 square feet Hardscape: 26,617 square feet 2-3 The west side of Day Creek from 250 feet north of Appellation to Church. The east side of Day Creek from Church to Madrigal. The Day Creek median from Church to Baseline. The south side of Madrigal from Day Creek to Roundhill. Ground cover area: 35,420 square feet Hardscape: 42,671 square feet 2-4 Victoria Park Lane from Baseline to the east entrance of Arbor Park. The southwest corner of Victoria Park Lane and Baseline. The southeast corner of Victoria Park Lane to 445 feet east of Victoria Park Lane. Ground cover area: 36,482 square feet Turt area: 3,874 square feet Hardscape: 32,927 square feet 2-5 The east and west side of Victoria Park Lane and the medians from Mosaic Dr. to Church. Ground cover area: 56,358 square feet Hardscape: 20,390 square feet 2-6 The north side of Church from Arbor Lane to Day Creek. The northwest corner of Church and Arbor Lane. The paseo from the north side of Church to Wilson Creek Dr... Ground cover area: 18,469 square feet Hardscape: 15,159 square feet 2-7 The north side of Church from Victoria Park Lane to Arbor Lane. The northwest corner of Victoria Park Lane and Church. The paseo from the north side of Church to Elk Cove Court. The paseo from the north side of Church to Freestone Court. The northeast corner of Arbor Lane and Church. Ground cover area: 16,609 square feet Hardscape: 13,730 square feet 2-8 The paseo from the west side of Etiwanda to Silver Rose Court. The north side of Church from Etiwanda to Victoria Park Lane. The east side of Iron Horse PI. from Church to Wild Horse Way. The paseo from the north side of Church to Cloudy Bay Ct. The medians from Iron Horse PI. to Etiwanda. Ground cover area: 35,122 square feet Hardscape: 28,473 square feet '863 square feet of ground cover added due to the addition of the Silver Rose paseo on 2- 14-07.The previous square footage was 34,259. VW-1 Base Line median from Victoria Park Lane to 830 feet west of Victoria Park Lane. Ground cover area: 4,514 square feet Hardscape: 3,474 square feet Mulchscape: 0 square feet VW-2 The north side of Baseline 300 feet east and 200 feet west of Swanson. The east and west sides of Swanson from Baseline to Province. The paseo from the intersection of Swanson and Province to Atwood with outlet to Dunmore. The paseo from Atwood to the Southern Pacific Railroad. The north side of Saratoga from Powell to Dunmore. The paseo from Saratoga to Etiwanda. The south side of Atwood from Victoria Park Lane to Travis. The north side of Atwood from Walcott to Victoria Park Lane. Ground cover area: 18,753 square feet Turt area: 73,931 square feet Hardscape: 22,615 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 6 Fiscal Year 2011/12 VW-3 The Victoria Park Lane median and the west and east side parkways from Baseline to the entrance to Victoria Village. Ground cover area: 24,453 square feet Turf area: 2,637 square feet Hardscape: 3,214 square feet VW-4 The Victoria Park Lane median and the west and east side parkways from Victoria Village entrance to Atwood. Ground cover area: 30,695 square feet Turf area: 10,242 square feet Hardscape: 6,428 square feet VW-5 The Victoria Park Lane median and the west side and east side parkways from Atwood to the Southern Pacific Railroad. Ground cover area: 49,513 square feet Hardscape: 5,467 square feet VW-6 The paseo running north from 12732 Farrington to the Southern Pacific Railroad. Ground cover area: 285 square feet Hardscape: 679 square feet VW-7 The paseo running north from 12840 Farrington to the Southern Pacific Railroad. Ground cover area: 266 square feet Hardscape: 552 square feet VW-8 The Victoria Park Lane median and the west side parkway from the Southern Pacific Railroad to South Victoria Windrows Loop. The Victoria Park Lane east side parkway from the Southern Pacific Railroad to Zinnia Ct.. Ground cover area: 40,548 square feet Hardscape: 6,150 square feet Mulchscape: 0 square feet VW-9 The Victoria Park Lane east side parkway from Barberry to North Victoria Windrows Loop at Windrows Park. Ground cover area: 9,188 square feet Turf area: 3,851 square feet Hardscape: 3,720 square feet VW-10 The west side of Victoria Park Lane from South Victoria Windrows Loop to Dahlia Ct... The Victoria Park Lane median from Zinnia Ct. to Dahlia Ct...The east side of Victoria Park Lane from North Victoria Windrows Loop at Windrows Park to Dahlia Ct. Ground cover area: 25,148 square feet Turf area: 37,350 square feet Hardscape: 11,400 square feet *4-15-10 Reduction of 2,250 square feet of ground cover. Area between Windrows Park and outer trail fence has been mulchscaped and turned over to the Parks Department. VW-11 The east side parkway on South Victoria Windrows Loop from Silktassel to Victoria Park Lane. The parkway on the south side of Victoria Park Lane from the intersection of South Victoria Windrows Loop and North Victoria Windrows Loop to Dahlia Ct... The Victoria Park Lane median from the intersection of North and South Victoria Windrows Loop to Dahlia Ct...The parkway on the north side of Victoria Windrows Loop from the intersection of North and South Victoria Windrows Loop to Dahlia Ct... Ground cover area: 23,082 square feet Turf area: 24,187 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 7 Fiscal Year 2011/12 Hardscape: 6,988 square feet VW-12 The Victoria Park Lane median from the intersection of North and South Victoria Windrows Loop to 390 feet east of Day Creek. The parkway on the north side of Victoria Park Lane from the intersection of North and South Victoria Windrows Loop to 390 feet east of Day Creek. The parkway on the west side of north Victoria Windrows Loop from Silverberry to Victoria Park Lane. The parkway on the south side of Silverberry from 390 feet east of Day Creek to North Victoria Windrows Loop. Ground cover area: 149,010 square feet Turf area: 38,842 square feet Hardscape: 12,868 square feet VW-13 The parkway on the south side of Victoria Park Lane from 390 feet east of Day Creek to South Victoria Windrows Loop. The west side of South Victoria Windrows Loop from Victoria Park Lane to Snapdragon. Ground cover area: 20,068 square feet Turt area: 16,476 square feet Hardscape: 7,200 square feet VW-14 The parkway on the west side of South Victoria Windrows Loop from Snapdragon to Victoria Park Lane. The parkway on the north and south side of Sugargum from South Victoria Windrows Loop to 390 feet east of Day Creek. The parkways on the east and west sides of Basswood from Sugargum to Blazing Star. The parkway on the north side of South Victoria Windrows Loop from Victoria Park Lane to Silktassel. Ground cover area: 21,466 square feet Turf area: 10,335 square feet Hardscape: 27,560 square feet VW-15 The parkway on the north side of Bougainvillea Way from Peach to North Victoria Windrows Loop. The parkway on the east side of North Victoria Windrows Loop from Bougainvillea Way to Citrus. The parkway on the north side of North Victoria Windrows Loop from Locust and following that curb line to Silverberry. The parkway on the north side of Silverberry from North Victoria Windrows Loop 390 feet east of Day Creek. The paseo from North Victoria Windrows Loop at Silverberry to Nasturtium. The paseo from North Victoria Windrows Loop at Locust to Pistachio and continuing to Bougainvillea. Ground cover area: 45,929 square feet Turf area: 12,207 square feet Hardscape: 23,630 square feet VW-16 The south side of Highland from 455 feet east of Day Creek to 534 feet east of Locust. The east and west side of Locust from Highland to North Victoria Windrows Loop. The parkway on the south side of. North Victoria Windrows Loop from Citrus east to Bougainvillea Ct... The parkway on the north side of North Victoria Windrows Loop from Twinspur to Locust. Ground cover area: 26,577 square feet Turf area: 23,922 square feet Hardscape: 19,203 square feet VW-17 This site was modified and added to VW-16, 1-5-99. VW-18 The south side of Highland from 12583 Highland to Rockrose. Ground cover area: 2,800 square feet Turt area: 8,515 square feet Hardscape: 3,325 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2011/12 VW-19 The north side of North Victoria Windrows Loop from Rosemary to Rockrose. The east side of Rockrose from North Victoria Windrows Loop to Highland. The south side of Highland from Rockrose to Etiwanda. The horse trail from Highland and Etiwanda to the Fire Station. Ground cover area: 21,027 square feet Turf area: 32,266 square feet Hardscape: 11,298 square feet VW-20 The parkway on the south side of North Victoria Windrows Loop from Victoria Park Lane to Plum. The parkway on the west side of North Victoria Windrows Loop from Plum Way to Rosemary Ct...The paseo from Tipu PI. east to the open field. Note: The area in front of Windrows Park is watered by VW-20 water meter, but is maintained by City crews. Ground cover area: 2,110 square feet Turf area: 16,411 square feet Hardscape: 9,132 square feet VW-21 The east side of North Victoria Windrows Loop from Rosemary Ct. to the trail south of Kalmia St. The trail and paseo from North Victoria Windrows Loop south of Kalmia St. to Etiwanda Ave. and north to the Fire Station. The south side of Basil St. from North Victoria Windrows Loop to Santolina PI.. Ground cover area: 49,187 square feet Turf area: 57,532 square feet Hardscape: 19,600 square feet VW-22 The paseo from North Victoria Windrows Loop at Rockrose to the northeast corner of Windrows Park and from that corner to Plum. Ground cover area: 13,689 square feet Turt area: 19,953 square feet Hardscape: 9,489 square feet VW-23 The west side of Rockrose from Highland to North Victoria Windrows Loop. The parkway on the north side of North Victoria Windrows Loop from Rockrose to Twinspur. The parkway on the south side of North Victoria Windrows Loop from Bougainvillea Ct. to Rosemary. Ground cover area: 18,299 square feet Turt area: 3,425 square feet Hardscape: 10,352 square feet VW-24 The M.W.D. easement from Jasmine and Ironbark to Sweet Gum Dr. Ground cover area: 475 square feet Turf area: 4,730 square feet VW-25 The north side of Baseline from 384 feet west of Wanona to Etiwanda. The west side of Etiwanda from Baseline to Craig. The Baseline median from Swanson PI. to Etiwanda. Ground cover area: 20,934 square feet Turf area: 3,079 square feet Hardscape: 12,799 square feet VW-26 The paseo from Grape to 630 feet west of Grape. Ground cover area 7,021 square feet Hardscape: 8,548 square feet VW-27 The south side of Baseline from 251 feet west of Swanson to Etiwanda. The Baseline median from Victoria Park Lane to Swanson Place. Ground cover area 18,816 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 9 Fiscal Year 2011/12 Hardscape: 17,233 square feet 'This site had 2 667 feet of ground cover added due to addition of Baseline median 6-8- 2005. VG-1 The turf and ground cover on the south side of Highland from the Deer Creek Channel to Fairmont. The turt and ground cover from Highland on the west side of Fairmont to Victoria Park Lane. The ground cover on the north side of Victoria Park Lane south of the horse trail from 475 feet east of Milliken to Fairmont. The turf on the north side of Victoria Park Lane from 275 feet east of Milliken to Fairmont. The turf in the parkway on the east side of Fairmont from Victoria Park Lane to Highland. Ground cover area: 21,573 square feet Turt area: 47,604 square feet Hardscape: 17,300 square feet VG-2 The turf on the east side of York from Delaware to Fairmont. The ground cover on the south side of Fairmont from York Place and continuing on that curb line to Victoria Park Lane. The turf and ground cover on the south side of Victoria Park Lane west of Milliken from Fairmont to Milliken. The parkway on the west side of Milliken from Victoria Park Lane to Fairmont. The Milliken median from Fairmont to Victoria Park Lane. The turt on the north side of Victoria Park Lane from 273 feet west of Milliken to Milliken. The ground cover on the north side of Victoria Park Lane south of the horse trail from 468 feet west of Milliken to Milliken. Ground cover area: 29,395 square feet Turt area: 73,608 square feet Hardscape: 20,173 square feet VG-3 The turt and ground cover north of the sidewalk on the north side of Fairmont from Nova Ct. continuing on that curb line to York PI. and the turf south of the sidewalk on the north side of Fairmont from Armstrong PI. continuing on that curb line to York PI...The ground cover on the west side of York PI. from Fairmont to Delaware and the ground cover on the east side of York PI...The turt and ground cover on the west side of Fairmont from Emerson continuing along that curb line to Armstrong PI... The turf and ground cover on the east and west sides of Biola PI. Ground cover area: 57,189 square feet Turf area: 38,343 square feet Hardscape: 26,848 square feet VG-4 The turf and ground cover on the south side of Fairmont from Armstrong to Milliken. The turf and ground cover on the west side of Milliken from Fairmont to the Southern Pacific Railroad. The Milliken median from Fairmont to the Southern Pacific Railroad. The ground cover on the north side of the Southern Pacific Railroad from Deer Creek Channel to Rochester including the paseo to Baylor. The ground cover on the north side of Fairmont from Milliken to Nova Ct... The turf on the north side of Fairmont from Milliken to Armstrong. Ground cover area: 197,763 square feet Turt area: 24,151 square feet Hardscape: 12,278 square feet VG-5 The paseo from Biola at Amarillo to Delaware at York. Ground cover area: 12,448 square feet Turf area: 44,896 square feet Hardscape: 7,992 square feet VG-6 The paseo beginning at the northeast corner of Victoria Groves Park and Fairmont and extending to the Deer Creek Channel. Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 10 Fiscal Year 2011/12 Ground cover area: 73,442 square feet Turf area: 74,778 square feet Hardscape: 16,629 square feet VG-7 The paseo that begins on the south side of Donnelly at Fairmont and continues to the Deer Creek Channel including the southward extension on the west side of Albright from Donnelly to Pacific and the paseo from Pacific to Charleston. Ground cover area: 43,427 square feet Turf area: 51,765 square feet Hardscape: 15,806 square feet VG-8 The ground cover on the west side of Milliken from 566 feet north of Victoria Park Lane to Victoria Park Lane. The ground cover and turf north of the horse trail on Victoria Park Lane from Milliken to Fairmont. The ground cover on the east side of Fairmont from Victoria Park Lane to 156 feet north of Victoria Park Lane. Ground cover area: 21,614 square feet Turf area: 8,614 square feet Hardscape: 8,281 square feet VG-9 The ground cover on the east side of Fairmont from 156 feet north of Victoria Park Lane to Kenyon Way. The ground cover on the south side of Kenyon from Fairmont to 197 feet east of Fairmont. The turf on the south side of Kenyon from Fairmont to 316 feet east of Fairmont. The turf and ground cover on the south side of Baltimore Dr. from Fairmont to Baltimore Ct... The turt and ground cover on the north side of Baltimore Dr. from Fairmont to Vanderbilt. The turf and ground cover on the east side of Vanderbilt from Baltimore to Brown. The paseo from Vanderbilt and Brown to Kenyon. Ground cover area: 48,481 square feet Turf area: 11,357 square feet Hardscape: 13,542 square feet VG-10 The ground cover on the south side of Kenyon from 197 feet east of Fairmont to Milliken. The turf on the south side of Kenyon from 316 feet east of Fairmont to Milliken. The ground cover on the west side of Milliken from Kenyon to 566 feet north of Victoria Park Lane. The turf and ground cover on the west side of Capitol from Brown to Bethany. The paseo from Capitol and Brown to Kenyon. Ground cover area: 34,241 square feet Turf area: 11,031 square feet Hardscape: 5,320 square feet VG-11 The east and west side parkways and median of Milliken from Baseline to the Southern Pacific Railroad. The north side of Baseline from 542 feet east of Milliken to Milliken. Ground cover area: 31,367 square feet Turf area: 17,264 square feet Hardscape: 25,524 square feet *This site was reduced on 4-1-2002 by 25,718 sq. ft. of turf and 3,037 sq. ft. of ground cover VG-12 The turf and ground cover on the south side of Fairmont from the southeast corner of Milliken and Fairmont along the curb line to Victoria Park Lane. The turf and ground cover on the west side of Fairmont from the southwest corner of Victoria Park Lane and Fairmont (located east of Milliken) and continuing along the curb line to Milliken. The turt on the east side of Milliken from the Southern Pacific Railroad to 730 feet south of Victoria Park Lane. The ground cover on the east side of Milliken from the Southern Pacific Railroad to 766 feet south of Victoria Park Lane. Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 11 Fiscal Year 2011/12 Ground cover area: 53,066 square feet Turt area: 36,431 square feet Hardscape: 27,004 square feet VG-13 The paseos from Victoria Park Lane to Verona, Verona to Napoli,- and Genova to Tivoli. Ground cover area: 17,993 square feet Turf area: 16,344 square feet Hardscape: 8,376 square feet VG-14 The Baseline median from Milliken to Ellena East. The turt and ground cover on the north side of Baseline from Ellena East to Ellena West. The turf and ground cover on the east side of Ellena West from Baseline and following the curb line to Kenyon. The north side of Ellena West from Kenyon to Casoli. The turf and ground cover on both sides of Casoli from Ellena West to Candela. The turt and ground cover on both sides of Crema Place from Ellena west to Candela. Ground cover area: 89,456 square feet Turf area: 62,999 square feet Hardscape: 44,826 square feet VG-15 The turf and ground cover on the west side of Rochester from the Southern Pacific Railroad to Baseline. The turt and ground cover on the north side of Baseline from Rochester to Ellena East. The Baseline Median from Rochester to Ellena East. The turt and ground cover on the east side of Ellena east from Baseline and continuing along that curb line to 275 feet north of Berra Road. The turf and ground cover on both sides of Berra from Ellena East to Comiso. Ground cover area: 58,588 square feet Turf area: 57,306 square feet Hardscape: 36,014 square feet VG-16 The paseo from Baseline to Ellena West with entrances to Amelia and Pavola. Ground cover area: 9,661 square feet Turf area: 11,529 square feet Hardscape: 5,804 square feet VG-17 The paseo from Fairmont to the Southern Pacific Railroad. The paseo from Fabriano to Martano. Ground cover area'. Turf area: Hardscape: VG-18 The paseo from Ra Ground cover area', Hardscape: 35,351 square feet 40,291 square feet 16,394 square feet pallo to Gandino and south to the Southern Pacific Railroad 4,281 square feet 1,308 square feet VG-19 The paseo from Tolentino to Pizolli and to Tolentino. Ground cover area: 12,555 square feet Turt area: 17,856 square feet Hardscape: 7,380 square feet VG-20 The turf on the east side of Milliken from 730 feet south of Victoria Park Lane to Victoria Park Lane. The ground cover on the east side of Milliken from 766 feet south of Victoria Park Lane to Victoria Park Lane. The turf and ground cover on the south side of Victoria Park Lane from the southeast corner at Milliken heading east to Fairmont. The turf and ground cover on the north side of Victoria Park Lane from Parma to the northeast corner of Milliken and Victoria Park Lane. The ground cover on the west side of Parma from Victoria Park Lane to Lomello. The Victoria Park Lane median from Milliken to Pandino Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 12 Fiscal Year 2011/12 Ct...The Milliken median from Victoria Park Lane to 440 feet south of Kenyon. The parkway on the west side of Milliken from 420 feet south of Kenyon to Victoria Park Lane. Ground cover area: 76,232 square feet Turt area: 97,979 square feet Hardscape: 22,177 square feet VG-21 The ground cover on the east side of Parma from Victoria Park Lane to Lomello. The ground cover on the north side of Victoria Park Lane from Parma to 653 feet east of Kenyon. The turf on the north side of Victoria Park Lane from Parma to 547 feet east of Kenyon. The turt and ground cover on the south side of Victoria Park Lane from Fairmont to 422 feet east of Kenyon. The turf and ground cover on the east and west sides of Kenyon from Victoria Park Lane to the Southern Pacific Railroad. The paseo from Kenyon to Rapallo. The paseo from Kenyon to Bari. The Victoria Park Lane median from Pandino Ct. to Portofino Ct... Ground cover area: 69,167 square feet Turf area: 58,692 square feet Hardscape: 34,478 square feet VG-22 The ground cover on the north side of Victoria Park Lane from 653 feet east of Kenyon to Rochester. The turf on the north side of Victoria Park Lane from 547 feet east of Kenyon to Rochester. The Victoria Park Lane median from Portofino Ct. to Rochester Ave... The turf and ground cover on the south side of Victoria Park Lane north of the sidewalk from Kenyon to the east side of Vintage Park. The turt and ground cover on the south side of Victoria Park Lane from the east side of Vintage Park to Rochester. The turf and ground cover on the west side of Rochester from Victoria Park Lane to the Southern Pacific Railroad. Ground cover area: 83,397 square feet Turf area: 89,674 square feet Hardscape: 20,863 square feet VG-23 The turf and ground cover on the east side of Kenyon from Victoria Park Lane to 409 feet west of Grimaldi. The ground cover on the south side of Portofino from Kenyon to Bergano. The turf and ground cover on the north and south side of Lark from Kenyon to the west property line of Rancho Cucamonga High School. The ground cover on the east and west side of Matera from Lark to Pescara. The ground cover on the north and south side of Grimaldi from Kenyon to Brindisi. The turf and ground cover on the west side of Kenyon from Lark to Victoria Park Lane. The ground cover on the north and south side of Marcello from Kenyon to Landriano. The paseo from southwest corner of Kenyon Park to Kenyon. Ground cover area: 63,733 square feet Turf area: 82,565 square feet Hardscape: 39,297 square feet VG-24 The north side of Kenyon from Autumn Glen court to Woodruff. The east side of Woodruff from Kenyon to 403 feet north of Kenyon. Ground cover area: 8,447 square feet Turf area: 5,320 square feet Hardscape: 5,622 square feet VG-25 The paseo west of Torino from Kenyon to Highland. The turt and ground cover on the south side of Highland from the northwest corner of Tract 13440 to the east end of Tract 13440. Ground cover area: 40,800 square feet Turt area: 24,134 square feet Hardscape: 14,353 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 13 Fiscal Year 2011/12 VG-26 The paseo from Brindisi Ct. to Messina. The turf and ground cover on the north side of Brindisi Ct. to the end of the cul-de-sac. The turf and ground cover on the west side of Messina from the paseo to Treviso Way. Ground cover area: 18,905 square feet Turf area: 1,141 square feet Hardscape: 3,615 square feet VG-27 The Milliken median from 440 feet south of Kenyon to Highland. The parkway on the west side of Milliken from 420 feet south of Kenyon. Grcund cover area: 4,030 square feet Turf area: 3,006 square feet Hardscape: 4,222 square feet `Reduced 1,670 square feet of G.C. on 7-1-00 VG-28 The east side of Rochester from Victoria Park Lane to Highland. Ground cover area: 60,902 square feet Hardscape: 5,593 square feet VG-29 The north side of Kenyon from Milliken to Fairmont. The groundcover on the east side of Fairmont, east of the sidewalk, from Kenyon to the 210 freeway. Ground cover area: 20,178 square feet Turf area: 16,877 square feet Hardscape: 5,736 square feet 'Reduction of 18,940 of turt on 7-1-00. Reduction of 5,670 square feet of groundcover on 3-20-03. VG-30 The south side of Tresenda from Santo to Sapada. The paseo from Sapada to Carano. The south side of Montella from Carano to Trivento. Ground cover area: 6,797 square feet Turf area: 2,462 square feet Hardscape: 4,860 square feet VG-31 The east side of Brienza from Larino to Letini. The west side of Tindari from Letini to Larino. The Greenbelt on the south side of Marconi from Trivento to Comisco. The east side of Comisco from Scalea to Santo. Ground cover area: 23,419 square feet Turt area: 18,351 square feet Hardscape: 13,764 square feet VG-32 The north side of Candela from Terini to Bettoloa. Ground cover area: 20,172 square feet Turt area: 8,190 square feet Hardscape: 8,292 square feet VG-33 The paseo at the north end of Sapri to the Southern Pacific Railroad. Ground cover area: 894 square feet Hardscape: 318 square feet VG-34 The paseo at the north end of Bronte to the Southern Pacific Railroad. Ground cover area: 894 square feet Hardscape: 318 square feet VG-35 The east side of Rochester from 555 feet south of Palmi to Victoria Park Lane. The south Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 14 Fiscal Year 2011 /12 side of Victoria Park Lane and median from Rochester to east side of Deer Creek Channel. Ground cover area: 53,646 square feet Turf area: 11,150 square feet Hardscape: 17,555 square feet VG-36 The north side of Victoria Park Lane from the east side of Deer Creek Channel to Rochester. Ground cover area: 55,780 square feet Turf area: 10,500 square feet Hardscape: 8,004 square feet VG-37 The paseo at the end of Ardmoor Ct. to the Southern Pacific Railroad. Ground cover area: 1,350 square feet Hardscape: 950 square feet VG-38 The east side of Milliken from 106 feet north of Victoria Park Lane to Kenyon. The north and south side of Spring Mist Drive from Milliken to Summerstone. The south side of Kenyon from Milliken to Kenyon Park. Ground cover area: 28,051 square feet Turf area: 4,533 square feet Hardscape: 12,879 square feet VG-39 The north side of Victoria Park Lane from Kenyon paseo to 132 feet east of Milliken. The Kenyon paseo from Victoria Park Lane to Fairwinds Court. The paseo from Victoria Park Lane to the south west corner of Kenyon Park. Ground cover area: 55,089 square feet Turf area: 13,120 square feet Hardscape: 7,676 square feet VG-40 The south side of Highland from 413 feet west of Highland paseo to Highland paseo. The east side of Highland paseo from Highland to Kenyon. The north side of Kenyon from Highland paseo to Autumn Glen Court. Ground cover area: 56,553 square feet Hardscape: 12,314 square feet VG-41 The west side of Rochester from 294 feet south of Highland to Lark. The north side of Lark from Rochester to 1230 feet west of Rochester. Ground cover area: 31,413 square feet Hardscape: 13,338 square feet VG-42 The south side of Highland from 1314 feet west of Rochester to Rochester. The west side of Rochester from Highland to 294 feet south of Highland. The north side of Highland from Rochester to Woodruff. Ground cover area: 40,346 square feet. ' Hardscape: 15,445 square feet 'This site originally was 18,464 square feet before the addition of 21,882 square feet to the north side of Highland. VG-43 The north side of Victoria Park Lane and the median from Day Creek Blvd. to Day Creek Channel. The east and west side of Kensington PI. from Victoria Park Lane to Stratford Dr. Ground cover area: 70,669 square feet Turf area: 7,888 square feet Hardscape: 18,426 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 15 Fiscal Year 2011/12 VG-44 The west side of Day Creek Blvd. from 572 feet north of Silverberry to Day Creek Blvd. The south side of Silverberry from Kensington to Day Creek Blvd. Ground cover area: 36,835 square feet Hardscape: 24,376 square feet VG-45 The west side of Milliken and the Milliken median from the 210 freeway to Kenyon. Ground cover area: 10,658 square feet Turf area: 610 square feet Hardscape: 5,589 square feet VG-46 The Baseline median from 657 feet east of Virginia Dr. to Rochester. The north side of Baseline from 278 feet east of Virginia to Rochester. The paseo from the northeast corner of Rochester and Base Line to Huntley. The east side of Rochester from Baseline to 105 feet north of Shenandoah. Ground cover area: 33,135 square feet Hardscape: 19,340 square feet VG-47 The north side of Baseline from 400 feet east of Day Creek Blvd. to Day Creek Blvd. Baseline median from Day Creek Blvd. to 595 feet east of Day Creek Blvd. Ground cover area: 9,515 square feet. Hardscape: 7,926 square feet `This site had an addition 6-8-2004 6,272 square feet of ground cover for median. VG-48 The east side of Day Creek Blvd. and median from Baseline to Victoria Park Lane. The south side of Victoria Park Lane from Day Creek Blvd. to 390 feet east of Day Creek Blvd. Ground cover area: 50,318 square feet Turf Area: 3,234 square feet Hardscape: 29,217 square feet VG-49 The north side of Victoria Park Lane and median from 390 feet east of Day Creek Blvd to Day Creek Blvd. The east side of Day Creek Blvd from Victoria Park Lane to Highland. The south side of Highland from Day Creek Blvd. to 440 feet east of Day Creek Blvd. Ground cover area: 51,459 square feet Turf Area: 3,930 square feet Hardscape: 32,296 square feet VG-50 The west side of San Carmelo from 389 feet north of Baseline to Baseline. The north side of Baseline from Carmelo to 264 feet west of Durness. Ground cover area: 18,043 square feet Hardscape: 12,383 square feet VG-51 The Paseo south of Saxon to Southern Pacific Railroad. Ground cover area: 1,398 square feet Hardscape: 969 square feet VG-52 The north side of Sugar Gum from Milliken to Kensington. The south side of Sugar Gum from Milliken to 111 feet east of Suffolk. Ground cover area: 4,362 square feet Hardscape: 3,325 square feet VG-53 The south side of Victoria Park Lane from 296 feet west of Kensington to Milliken. The west side of Day Creek Blvd. from Victoria Park Lane to 397 feet south of Sugar Gum. Ground cover area: 28,532 square feet Turf Area: 11,070 square feet Hardscape: 7,720 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 - Ciry of Rancho Cucamonga 16 Fiscal Year 2011112 VG-54 The east side of Rochester from Shenandoah to the Southern Pacific Railroad. Ground cover area: 6,684 square feet Hardscape: 5,136 square feet VG-55 The paseo north of Westhaven to the Southern Pacific Railroad. Ground cover area: 1,775 square feet Hardscape: 2,575 square feet VG-56 The south side of Highland from 1,317 feet west of Day Creek to 1,085 feet west of Day Creek including the non-irrigated slope on the south side of the sidewalk. Ground cover area: 5,274 square feet Hardscape: 1,761 square feet VG-57 The north side of Highland from Fairmont Way to the Day Creek Channel. Ground cover area: 16,157 square feet Hardscape: 17,405 square feet Map of Improvements The following page shows the map of landscaping improvements, including irrigation sites and community trails, to be maintained using District funds. Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 17 Fiscal Year 2011/12 ~ a Z i w J J _ _ _ _A'd`dONdM113 ~ N O ~ ^N^,, ' 7 ~ ~ N W r lL' ~ ~ N1 N ~ ~ N ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ °° o N ~ N ~ O dO ~ M Q ~ N ~ys Y/ ~ _. o ~ ~ ~ !~° ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ N O Oo ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O O N ~ °_ ~ O ~ ~, ~ ~ _ ~ .- cv ~ ~.~ g~ N ~ N ° O 3 ~ I ~ ~ LJ L(') N O 4' ~ ~ ~ ~ •' ~ ~ r~ O ~ N O N Q QN~`1 M ~ o Z ~, r, ~ M w ~`~ O ~ O n N N '='Q H -N U ~9 ~133a~ ~ba - ~~ o ~ ~ • > N ~ > ~ t~ O ~ O ~ > °' > ~ A Z ~ > ~ c~ r.+ ~. i~ ,'" ~' ~ o ~ Q ~, O ~° q ~ yy ~ 00 ~p yy M) N > = C O Q O A O ~ ~ O n' /fit/ a31S3HDOa a ~ r _ > ~+ a I N w ~ ,QQ, ~ (7 0. N ~ N ___ ~ ~ Igo ~ >'~ ~ ~ O g ° Q ; i - ---T--c~~~ot .` ~p ~ co "~ r ~ m ~ //Q~~. .C=`J C9. ~ j C9 zr o'$co - `~ L E c~~~ c o m W ~ N ! ~ ~ i.~ ° U O m U H p m yt. ~~ L N N C C - '~ p,c a m y N m 3 ~ c ~ m > O , ~ M O co L°Eo~a`~~c~m 3~~~~Oc 10 ~ M ~O or mo..m u, ~n°a ct-io (~ O N r u cc~, °-- vo°_-mn C7 O @ C9 ~ m~ m~ w E m ~ m .~ ~~ D~ o >. p O > 00 ~'~ ~ > > o~oWmo~m€~a~c~`~~cmi a MM N~ 10 O c°g'~~~^cw=mots `°"~.-'? C C9 N N ~ ~ N y.~~~mcmmmrn~3mm~od > N >> ~> 1 ~ U' n~~ornm~~,vcoy oNO~~ J '~ ~ ~t~~°nT~mEna~~`mo O ~ ~/ O ~O > W o°n~ms°cmU ar~gc~an ~ ~ > < o~ ~d'io2~o m~ ro ~ d O (7 1 ~ maumicLim10smaciuvcora,~'mna O O N M N M N ~ ~ ; ~a`c~d m c1E~~ m~ m a`+° Wvt N i~~ V' (~ U' U' V' nmm° v°m~O Eo~ol=o~m ~ > > > > > > m Em~(JctvN~$cUm `cmcEm N O O O O O mmnmtp€c ~m ~gmm 3>.,c~ m d ~ O O -... O /~V N~~11 ~1IW~.. H~'o `m 1=3g'_~.°.°s~v~w~igm25 m' 0 N ~ O > Q Q ~ r ~ O Q ~ ~ c~ ~ a ~ cn U O ~ Z ~ Q ~ .~ , ~ ~o ~ ~ N C d w ~ ~ U c it c~ ~ H w ~ > ~ ~ ~ ~ O `° w ~ U Q ~ I J ~ -~ `~ ~ (¢7 `~ Y w~ w w U ~ ~ H O Z ~ c ~' U Z~ w ~ OO ~ ~ ~i ~ ~i ~ U d d - ~ ~ d v 1 ~ H ~i~ ~ ~ Oa ~ " I d I ~~ ~ ESTIMATE OF COSTS The estimated costs of administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing the improvements as described in the Plans and Specifications are summarized below. Each year, as part of the assessment district levy calculation process, the costs and expenses are reviewed and the annual costs are projected for the following fiscal year. District Estimated 2011/12 Bud et Personnel Services Regular Payroll $706,010.00 Overtime Salaries 1,090.00 Part-time Salaries 80,320.00 Fringe Benefts 339.100.00 Subtotal Personnel $1,126,520.00 Operations and Maintenance Operations and Maintenance $66,550.00 Vehicle Operations and Maintenance 5,000.00 Contract Services 846,780.00 Tree Maintenance 37,350.00 Utilities Telephone Utilities 1,010.00 Water Utilities 635,400.00 Electric Utilities 79,480.00 Assessment Administration 34,870.00 General Overhead 184.380.00 Subtotal Operations and Maintenance $1,890,820.00 Capital Expenditures Capital Outlav -Vehicles $11.550.00 Subtotal Capital Expenditures $11,550.00 Total District Expenditure Budget $3,028,890.00 Total Estimated Assessment $2,963,200.00 Less Anticipated Delinquencies (210.820.00) Total Estimated Revenues $2,752,380.00 Plus Operating Reserve Fund Contribution 276.510.00 Total Expenditure Budget $3,028,890.00 Total Estimated Assessment $2,963,200.00 Total District EBU Count 7,021.80 Actual Assessment per EBU -Fiscal Year 2011/12 $422.00 Maximum Allowable Assessment er EBU -Fiscal Year 2011/12 $422.00 The maximum allowable assessment per EBU listed in the District budget above, is the amount which was approved in 1996197 and subsequent District annexations. Each year, prior to the assessments being placed on the tax roll, the City will review the budget and determine the amount needed to Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 18 Fiscal Year 2011/12 maintain the improvements for the upcoming fiscal year. The actual assessment per EBU will be based on the estimated costs of maintenance, available fund balance and maximum allowable assessment with the goal of maintaining the improvements in a satisfactory and healthy condition. The actual assessment amount may be lower than the maximum allowable assessment; however it may not exceed the maximum unless the increase is approved by the property owners in accordance with Proposition 21 S. It is the intent of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to maintain an Operating Reserve which shall not exceed the estimated costs of maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or when the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The reserve balance information for the District is as follows: Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2011 Reserve Fund Balance $2,181,650.00 Operating Reserve Contribution -Fiscal Year 2011/12 0.00 Operating Reserve Collection -Fiscal Year 2011/12 210.820.00 Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2012 Reserve Fund Balance $1,970,830.00 Definitions of Budget Items The following definitions describe the costs and expenses included in the District Budget: Personnel Services Regular Salaries: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all full-time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Part Time Salaries: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all part time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Fringe Benefits: This item includes the benefits available to City employees: health care, vacation, sick time, and retirement fund. Operations and Maintenance Contract Services: This item includes the contract costs of a landscape maintenance company responsible for the ongoing maintenance of the District improvements. Tree Maintenance: This item includes the contract costs attributed to maintaining the street trees and other trees throughout the District. Utilities -Water: This item includes the costs to furnish water for the landscaping within the District. Utilities -Electric: This item includes the costs to furnish electricity required for the operation and maintenance of the sprinklers and irrigation controllers. Assessment Administration: This item includes the cost to all particular departments and staff of the City, and consultants for providing the administration, coordination and management of District services, operations, and incidental expenses related to the District. This item also includes creation of an annual engineer's report, resolutions and placing the assessment amounts onto the County tax Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 19 Fiscal Year 2011/12 roll each year, along with responding to any public inquiries and future Proposition 218 balloting proceedings. General Overhead: This item includes the costs of all departments and staff of the City for providing the coordination of District services, inspections, annual bid management, responding to public concerns, public education, accounting, auditing and procedural matters associated with the District. This item also includes an allocation for general City staff time for administrative functions and systems that provide for a functional and operational assessment district within the City's administrative structure. Capital Expenditures: Capital Projects: This item includes new improvements to further enhance the level and quality of service provided within the boundaries of the District. This may include new monuments, irrigation systems, and other large improvements. Operating Reserve Collection: Operating Reserve Collection: This item includes the amount to be collected to maintain reserves to enable the City to pay for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or whenever the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The Reserve Fund contribution will continue until such a time the Reserve Fund balance is approximately one half of the annual costs. The fund may be allowed to accumulate in anticipation of any unforeseen expenses not included in the yearly maintenance costs. This may include, but is not limited to, tree replacements, repair of damaged equipment due to vandalism, storms and other similar events. Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 20 Fiscal Year 2011112 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT General Pursuant to the 1972 Act and Article XIII D, all parcels that have a special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements and services shall be identified, and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel shall be determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of improvements. The 1972 Act, permits the establishment of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include the operation, maintenance and servicing of landscaping improvements. Section 22573 of the 1972 Act requires that maintenance assessments must be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. This Section states: "The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district maybe apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or paroels in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements." The determination of whether or not a lot or parcel will benefit from the improvements shall be made pursuant to the Improvement Act of 1911 (Division 7 (commencing with Section 5000) (of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California)." The 1972 Act also permits the designation of zones of benefit within any individual assessment district if "by reasons or variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive different degrees of benefit from the improvement" (Sec. 22547). Article XIII D, Section 4(a) of the California Constitution limits the amount of any assessment to the proportional special benefit conferred on the property. Article XIII D also provides that publicly owned properties must be assessed unless there is clear and convincing evidence that those properties receive no special benefit from the assessment. Exempted from the assessment would be the areas of public streets, public avenues, public lanes, public roads, public drives, public courts, public alleys, public easements and rights-of-ways, public greenbelts and public parkways. The net amount to be assessed may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels. Proposition 218, approved by the voters in November 1996, requires the City to separate general benefit from special benefit, where only special benefit is assessed. Special Benefit The maintenance and servicing of the improvements within the District (which are described in the Description of Improvements and Services Section of this report) are for the benefit of the properties within the District, and as such confer a special and direct benefit to parcels within the District by: • improving the livability, appearance, and desirability for properties within the boundaries of the District, and • ensuring that improvements do not reach a state of deterioration or disrepair so as to be materially detrimental to properties within the District, and Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 21 Fiscal Year 2011/12 • providing beautification, shade and overall enhancement to properties within the District. The above mentioned items affect the assessed property in a way that is particular and distinct from their effect on other parcels and that real property in general and the public at large do not share. They contribute to a specific enhancement of the properties within the District. Since these improvements, including the community trails, were installed and are maintained specifically for the properties within the District; only properties within the District receive a special benefit and are assessed for said maintenance. General Benefit In addition to the special benefits received by parcels within the District, there are derivative general benefits that are conferred on parcels outside the boundaries of the District which include: • the control of dust and insect infestations, and • the visual enhancement of the area to persons or vehicles that may travel through the District. However it has been determined that these benefits are derivative and do not provide a direct benefit to parcels outside of the district that are not being assessed. Method of Assessment Each of the parcels within the District is deemed to receive special benefit from the improvements. Each parcel that has a special benefit conferred upon it as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements are identified and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel is determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of the improvements. When the District was formed in 1984, Article XIII D and Proposition 218 had not yet been passed. Upon the passage of Article XIII D and the subsequent passage of the Proposition Omnibus Implementation Act, new rules were put into place. Due to the changes in legal requirements, as property annexed to the District after the passage of the Assessment Law, the description of the method of assessment became more refined, however, the assessment per parcel has remained the same since the 1996197 Fiscal Year. Further, no parcel included in the District formation or annexations prior to when the language was refined, are now being levied differently than they were at the time the District was formed or the parcels were annexed. To assess special benefit appropriately, it is necessary to relate the different type of parcel improvements to each other. The Equivalent Benefit Unit ("EBU") method of apportionment uses the single family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single family home equals one Equivalent Benefit Unit (EBU). Every other land-use is converted to EBUs based on an assessment formula that equates to the property's specific development status, type of development (land-use), and size of the property, as compared to a single family home. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land-use types, as assigned by County use code, to determine each parcel's EBU assignment. Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 22 Fiscal Year 2011/12 Land-Use Equivalent Dwelling Units Pro ert T e Coun Use Code EBU Value Multi tier Single Family Residential 1.00 Dwelling Unit Condominium 1.00 Dwelling Unit Multi -Family 1.00 Dwelling Unit Commercial/ Industrial 2.00 Acre Vacant (incl. all undeveloped property) 0.25 Acre The use of the latest County Assessor's Secured Roll shall be the basis for the Property Type determination and units/acreage assignments, unless better data is available to the City. In addition, if any parcel within the District is identified by the County Auditor/Controller to be an invalid parcel number for the current fiscal year, the Property Type and EBU assignment shall be based on the correct parcel number and/or new parcel number(s) County use code and subsequent property information. If a single parcel has changed to multiple parcels, the EBU assignment and assessment amount applied to each of the new parcels will be recalculated rather than spread the proportionate share of the original assessment. The following table summarizes the Fiscal Year 2011/12 maximum allowable assessment rates for the District: Property Type (County Use Code) Maximum Allowable Assessment Rate er EBU Actual Assessment Rate per EBU Total UnitslAcres Total EBUs Single Family Residential $422.00 $422.00 6,322.00 6,322.00 Multi-family $422.00 $422.00 589.00 589.00 Commercial/Industrial $422.00 $422.00 52.73 105.46 Vacant $422.00 $422.00 21.36 5.34 The total amount of maintenance and incidental costs for maintaining the landscaping and community trail improvements is assessed to the individual parcels of real property within the District in proportion to the special benefit received by such parcels of real property. The proposed individual assessments are shown on the assessment roll in this report. Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 23 Fiscal Year 2011/12 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM An Assessment Diagram for the District is shown on the following page. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the County Assessor of the County San Bernardino, at the time this report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Engineer's Report. Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 24 Fiscal Year 2011/12 N v.. V ~~ N `I.r ;_ J •~ ~ Q _ . o o V ~ i ~ ny lway~ ~ 4 •y i ~ N (V C _ ~ I m ~ o j w ~ m ~ 3 0 ~~ I li Q 1 i - ._.._.._.._....._.._.._.._.._• [nV lse3 in G i ® i ~ i ny epuenn!33 ' ~ ny epuenn!33 i I 1 y ; ~ pe ~aa~~ fed _ i `. y_.._.._.._.._.._.._..I I ~ ny ~alsayoob !-- J i i ny ~alsayoob ,~..~ ~ i . i ~ ny ua~!II!W f._.._.._.._.._ - -~ ! ny ua~!II!W i i i i j i ny uaneH ~- _ - i _ i my uaneH i i _ ny esow~aH j =ny esow~aH i 1 nd PIeQ!4o~b' i inH PIeQ!4o~b' i ny uewllaH i - ~•~" i ~ ny uewllaH 1 r•' L s I i ~ co !ny p~elau ~ !n lS ue!lawe~ ~ - i ..~.._;l _ «i ~:. i 1 §6~E~~E ~ a ! ~~ ~ ~ _O •~ Ir t ~ Y•Y S i°eF.E E1 P ~S~ t.._.. •• • ~ .._ .._. .... ._~_ _ _l nd anal ty qq 96tS~E~E~j ~ ` ~_y ~ •~• ~_ L J m o' 3 ~ L E . fit ~ •aEyE °F g ~ ~3`~y $ ~ ~ F°g $ g ~E ~ ~ ~ c N ~ m O LL Q E gE E ~ eE Aa ~tl• °Y~~g EE e;§`E ~ ~• ~€t'~E~~fi~ ~ c N m 2 E fieppjpg~l¢•eaE6 ~~FE? ; g PP~ ~ ~z= EEe"3 E9~ z£ /, gg ,a3b dsaia0i~ 1 `~j EEba~ ~ [~fiE~ 2 ~E~t&E~a i! ASSESSMENT ROLL Assessment Roll The assessment roll is a listing of the assessment for Fiscal Year 2011/12 apportioned to each lot or parcel, as shown on the last equalized roll of the Assessor of the County of San Bernardino. The following tables summarize the Fiscal Year 2011/12 maximum and actual assessments for the District: Property Type Coun Use Code Maximum Allowable Assessment Rate er EBU Total Units/Acres Total EBUs Maximum Allowable Assessment Single Family Residential $422.00 6,322.00 6,322.00 $2,667,884.00 Multi-family $422.00 589.00 589.00 $248,558.00 Commercial/Industrial $422.00 52.73 105.46 $44,504.12 Vacant $422.00 21.36 5.34 $2.253.48 Property Type Coun Use Code Actual Assessment Rate er EBU Total UnitslAcres Total EBUs Actual Assessment Single Family Residential $422.00 6,322.00 6,322.00 $2,667,884.00 Multi-family $422.00 589.00 589.00 $248,558.00 Commercial/Industrial $422.00 52.73 105.46 $44,504.12 Vacant $422.00 21.36 5.34 $2.253.48 A copy of the full assessment roll is available for review in the City Clerk's office. Annexations There were no annexations effective for the 2011/12 Fiscal Year: Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 25 Fiscal Year 2011/12 DO NOT USE THIS STA.Fr RETORT. LMD 6 or 6-R were not intended to be a part of the P11 g Agenda packet but inadvertently included (pages P232 through P252). REFERENCE and USE information in the attached Staff Report following page P333. },,,~ J~ i_ ~ STAFF REPORT f1ll~{II~Iti 1'R.1'1']\'f: SERVICES DEP_~R1TfE\'1' RANCHO Date: August 3, 2011 CUCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager _,-.__ From: John R. Gillison, Assistant City Manager By: Ingrid Y. Bruce, GIS/Special Districts Manager Subject: CONSIDERATION TO APPROVE THE RESOLUTION CONFIRMING THE DIAGRAMS AND ASSESSMENTS APPROVE THE ANNUAL ENGINEER'S REPORTS, AND ORDER THE LEVY AND COLLECTION OF ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS FOR LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO'S. 1, 3A, 3B, 4-R, 5, 7, 8, 9 AND 10 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2011/2012. NO INCREASE OF THE ASSESSMENT RATE IS PROPOSED. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council approve the Resolution confirming the Diagrams and Assessments, approve the Annual Engineer's Reports, and order the levy and collection of assessments within Landscape Maintenance District No's. 1, 3A, 3B, 4-R, 5, 7, 8, 9 and 10. There is no increase to the current rates in these districts proposed for Fiscal Year 2011/2012. The Engineer's Reports are on file in the City Clerk's Office. BACKGROUNDIANALYSIS Each year, per the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972, the City is required to hold a public hearing to receive public comment on the levy and collection of assessments within Landscape Maintenance (LMD) No's. 1, 3A, 3B, 4-R, 5, 7, 8, 9 and 10 (each a "District" and collectively the "Districts"). This requirement must be accomplished before the City can submit the annual assessments for placement on the County Tax Roll. The following, along with reference to the Engineer's Reports for the Districts, identifies proposed Fiscal Year 2011/2012 assessment rates. The Engineer's Reports identify the required budget for each of the Districts, including the surplus, if any, remaining in the fund balance for any District. It has been determined, as stated in the Landscape Maintenance District's Fiscal Year 2011/2012 Engineer's Reports, that the assessment rates remain unchanged from the previous Fiscal Year 2010/2011's rates. The Fiscal Year 2011/2012 budget for each District is: LMD 1 Budgeted Expenses - $1,448,840.00 P117 CONSII>ISRn7'IGN'f0 AI'I'ROVI? T1IE 1tIiSGLU77ON I+OR LANDSCnI'E MAIN'I'IiNnNCE DIS7RIC'f NO'S. 1, 3A, 3B, 4-R, 5, 7, 8, 9 nNU 10. AUGUST 3, 2011 PAGE 2 Estimated assessment revenues including delinquencies - $1,119,480.00 The deficit of $329,360.00 will be made up from operating reserves. This will bring the current operating reserve balance down to $408,970.00. At the current level of expenditures it will be necessary to bring the District for a Prop 218 Assessment Ballot process in Calendar Year 2013 or reduce expenses to stay within revenues. LMD 3A Budgeted Expenses - $4,840.00 Estimated assessment revenues including delinquencies - $4,240.00 The deficit of $600.00 will be made up from operating reserves. LMD 3B Budgeted Expenses-$1,372,220.00 Estimated assessment revenues including delinquencies - $937,320.00 The deficit of $434,900.00 will be made up from operating reserves. This will bring the current operating reserve balance down to $675,290.00. At the current level of expenditures it will be necessary to bring the District for a Prop 218 Assessment Ballot process in Calendar Year 2013 or reduce expenses to stay within revenues. LMD 4-R Budgeted Expenses - $2,419,000.00 Estimated assessment revenues including delinquencies - $2,378,870.00 The deficit of $40,130.00 will be made up from operating reserves. This will bring the current operating reserve balance down to $1,954,540.00. LMD 5 Budgeted Expenses - $4,060.00 Estimated assessment revenues including delinquencies - $6,050.00. LMD 7 Budgeted Expenses - $939,630.00 P718 CONSIDIsRn'rION'1'O APPROVB'I'I~IG RI?SOI,Ur10N I~OR LANUSGIPE IvL\WTENANCIi DIS'1RICT NO'S. 1, 3A, 3B, 4-R, 5, 7, 8, 9 nN1~ 10. , Aucusr3,2011 Pnci~ 3 Estimated assessment revenues including delinquencies - $802,140.00 The deficit of $137,490.00 will be made up from operating reserves. This will bring the current operating reserve balance down to $777,150.00. At the current level of expenditures it will be necessary to bring the District for a Prop 218 Assessment Ballot process in Calendar Year 2013 or reduce expenses to stay within revenues. LMD 8 Budgeted Expenses - $26,030.00 Estimated assessment revenues including delinquencies - $28,620.00 LMD 9 Budgeted Expenses - $698,360.00 Estimated assessment revenues including delinquencies - $380,500.00 The deficit of $317,860.00 will be made up from operating reserves. LMD 10 Budgeted Expenses - $618,100.00 Estimated assessment revenues including delinquencies - $433,750.00 The deficit of $114,170.00 will be made up from operating reserves. The assessment rates and Districts description for each of the Landscape Maintenance Districts are as follows: Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 assessments pay for the on-going maintenance of parkways. The current assessment rate is $92.21 per single-family residence, and the multi-family rate is $46.11 per dwelling unit. Landscape Maintenance District No. 3A assessments pay for the on-going maintenance of parkways on Hyssop Drive. The current assessment rate is $413.74 per acre for commercial property. Landscape Maintenance District No. 36 assessments pay for the on-going maintenance of parkways within the commercial and industrial area of the City. The current assessment rate is $352.80 per acre for commercial property. P119 CONSIUliRATiON 'f0 AI'I'RO\'li'1'I{Ii RESOLD"PION I+OIi LANDSCr\PI? IvL\INTIiNANCB DIS'fitlC'1' NO'S. 1, 3A, 3B, 4R, 5, 7, 8, 9 nNU 10. AUGUST 3, 2011 PAGE 4 Landscape Maintenance District No. 4-R assessments pay for the on-going maintenance of parkways, paseos and parks within the Terra Vista Planned Community. The current assessment rate is $380.00 per single-family residence, the condominium rate is $304.00 per dwelling unit, and the multi-family rate is $266.00 per dwelling unit. The commercial rate is $1,235.00 per acre, and the vacant rate is $95.00 per acre. Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 assessments pay for the on-going maintenance of a Tot Lot located on the southwest corner of Andover Place and Bedford Drive. The current assessment rate is $113.29 per single-family residence. Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 assessments pay for the on-going maintenance of parkways and paseos within the Etiwanda Highlands Community. The current assessment rate is $307.05 per single-family residence. Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 assessments pay for the on-going maintenance of parkways in South Etiwanda. The current assessment rate is $151.45 per single-family residence. Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 assessments pay for the on-going maintenance of parkways in South Etiwanda. The current assessment rate is $187.00 per single-family residence. Landscape Maintenance District No. 10 assessments pay for the on-going maintenance of parkways in the future University Crest Project. The current assessment rate is $616.20 per single- family residence and $1,232.40 per acre for commercial property. Attachments Resolution Engineer's Reports P720 RESOLUTION NO. II'13~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONFIRMING THE DIAGRAMS AND ASSESSMENTS, APPROVING THE ANNUAL ENGINEER'S REPORTS AND ORDERING THE LEVY AND COLLECTION OF THE ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS WITHIN LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO'S. 1, 3A, 36, 4-R, 5, 7, 8, 9 AND 10 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2011/2012. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga did on the 6th day of July, 2011, adopt its Resolution of Intention No. 11-098 (the "Resolution of Intention") pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, as amended (the 1972 Act"), declaring its intention to levy and collect assessments within Landscape Maintenance Districts Nos. 1, 3A, 36, 4-R, 5, 6-R and 7 through 10, inclusive (each a "District" and collectively the "Districts") for Fiscal Year 2011/2012 and giving notice of the time and place for a public hearing by the City Council on the levy of the proposed assessments within the Districts; and WHEREAS, the City Council previously received and preliminarily approved a report of the Assessment Engineer (each an "Annual Engineer's Report" and collectively the "Annual ~~ Engineers Reports) for each District as required pursuant to Article 4 of Chapter 1 of the 1972 Act, Article XIIID of the Constitution of the State of California ("Article XIIID") and the Proposition 218 Omnibus Implementation Act (Government Code Section 53750 and following) (the "Implementation Act") (the 1972 Act, Article XIIID and the Implementation Act are referred to collectively as the "Assessment Law"); and WHEREAS, subsequent to the preliminary approval of the Annual Engineer's Reports, the Assessment Engineer revised each of the Annual Engineer's Reports (each a "Revised Annual Engineer's Report" and collectively the "Revised Annual Engineer's Reports") to add to such reports information regarding the annexations, if any, to each applicable District during Fiscal Year 2011-2012 and to make certain other insubstantial formatting revisions to the summary of assessments and the District budgets that did not result in an increase of the expenditure budget for the Districts, or any one of them, or the aggregate assessments or any individual assessment proposed to be levied within the Districts, or any one, of them; and WHEREAS, notice of such public hearing was duly and legally published in the time, form and manner as required by the Assessment Law, shown by the affidavit of Publication of said Resolution of Intention on file in the Office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, said City Council having duly received and considered evidence, oral and documentary, concerning the jurisdiction facts in this proceeding and concerning the necessity for the contemplated work and the benefits to be derived therefrom, and said City Council having now acquired jurisdiction to order the proposed work. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, DETERMINED AND ORDERED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, as follows: P121 SECTION 1. This City Council hereby finds and determines that: a. notice of the public hearing has been given and the proceedings for the consideration of the levy of the annual assessments within each District have been undertaken in accordance with the 1972 Act; and b. the annual assessments for Fiscal Year 2011/2012 proposed to be levied within each District as set forth in the applicable Revised Annual Engineer's Report do not exceed the annual assessments as previously authorized to be levied within such District, and therefore, the proposed levy of assessments for Fiscal Year 2011/2012 within such District are not deemed to be "increased" over the maximum authorized annual assessments. SECTION 2. The final assessments and diagrams for the proceedings, as contained in the Revised Annual Engineer's Report for each of the Districts, is hereby approved and confirmed. The assessments for the Districts contained in the Revised Annual Engineer's Reports for Fiscal Year 2011/2012 are hereby levied upon the respective lots or parcels in the Districts in the amounts as set forth in the applicable Revised Annual Engineer's Report. SECTION 3. This City Council hereby orders that the work, as set forth and described in the Resolution of Intention, be done and made. SECTION 4. The above-referenced diagram and assessment shall be filed in the Office of the City Clerk. Said diagram and assessment, and the certified copy thereof, shall be open for public inspection. SECTION 5. The City Clerk is hereby ordered and directed to immediately file a certified copy of the diagram and assessment with the County Auditor. Such filing shall be made no later than the 3rd Monday in August 2011. SECTION 6. After the filing of the diagram and assessment, the County Auditor shall enter on the County assessment roll opposite each lot or parcel of land the amount assessed thereupon, as shown in the assessment. SECTION 7. The assessments shall be collected at the same time and in the same manner as County taxes are collected, and all laws providing for the collection and enforcement of County taxes shall apply to the collection and enforcement of the assessments. SECTION 8. The assessments as above confirmed and levied for these proceedings will provide revenue and relate to the fiscal year commencing July 1, 2011 and ending June 30, 2012. P122 PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of August, 2011. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: L. Dennis Michael, Mayor ATTEST: Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk I, Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of said City Council held on 2011. Executed this , at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk P123 Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2011/2012 City of Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 (General City) P124 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (GENERAL CITY) 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Phone: 909.477.2740 Fax: 909.477.2741 CITY COUNCIL L. Dennis Michael, Mayor Sam Spagnolo, Mayor Pro Tem William Alexander, Council Member Chuck Buquet, Council Member Diane Williams, Council Member CITY STAFF John R. Gillison, Assistant City Manager Linda D. Daniels, Deputy City Manager William Wittkopf, Public Works Director Ingrid Y. Bruce, GIS/Special Districts Manager Christopher Bopko, Management Analyst III P125 TABLE OF CONTENTS ENGINEER'S LETTER INTRODUCTION 1 3 Reason for Assessment .............................................................................................3 Process for Annual Assessment .................................................................................3 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS 5 Description of the Boundaries of the District ...............................................................5 Description of Improvements and Services ................................................................5 Map of Improvements ...............................................................................................16 ESTIMATE OF COSTS 17 District Budget ..........................................................................................................17 Definitions of Budget Items .......................................................................................18 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT 20 General .....................................................................................................................20 Special Benefit .........................................................................................................20 General Benefit ........................................................................................................21 Method of Assessment Spread ................................................................................21 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM 23 ASSESSMENT ROLL 24 Assessment Roll .......................................................................................................24 Annexations .............................................................................................................. 24 P126 ENGINEER'S LETTER WHEREAS, on July 6, 2011, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 (the "1972 Act") adopted its Resolution No. 11-098, a Resolution Initiating Proceedings for the Levy of Annual Assessments for Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 (General City) (the "District"); and WHEREAS, the Resolution Initiating Proceedings directed staff to prepare and file an Engineer's Report for Fiscal Year 2011/12 pursuant to the requirements of the 1972 Act. The Engineer's Report presents the plans and specifications describing the general nature, location and extent of the improvements to be maintained, an estimate of the costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements for the District for the referenced fiscal year, a diagram for the District, showing the area and properties proposed to be assessed, and an assessment of the estimated costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing the improvements, assessing the net amount upon all assessable lots and/or parcels within the District in proportion to the special benefit received; and NOW THEREFORE, the following assessment is proposed to be authorized in order to pay the estimated costs of maintenance, operation and servicing of the improvements to be paid by the assessable real property within the boundaries of the District in proportion to the special benefit received. The following table summarizes the proposed assessment. SUMMARY OF ASSESSMENT Fiscal Year 2011112 Total Estimated Assessment $1,189,880.00 Less Anticipated Delinquencies (70 400.001 Total Estimated Revenue $1,119,480.00 Plus Reserve Fund Contribution 329.360.00 Total Expenditure Budget $1,448,840.00 Total District EBU Count 12,903.46 Actual Assessment per EBU $92.21 Maximum Allowable Assessment per EBU $92.21 In making the assessments dontained herein pursuant to the 1972 Act: I have identified all parcels which will have a special benefit conferred upon them from the improvements described in the Special Benefit Section of this Engineer's Report (the "Specially Benefited Parcels"). For particulars as to the identification of said parcels, reference is made to the Assessment Diagram, a copy of which is included in this Engineer's Report. 2. I have evaluated the costs and expenses of the improvements upon the Specially Benefited Parcels. In making such evaluation: Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2011/12 P127 a. The proportionate special benefit derived by each Specially Benefited Parcel from the improvements was determined in relationship to the entirety of the maintenance costs of the improvements; b. No assessment has been imposed on any Specially Benefited Parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on such parcel from the improvements; and c. Any general benefits from the improvements have been separated from the special benefits and only special benefits have been assessed. I, the undersigned, respectfully submit the enclosed Engineer's Report and, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, the Engineer's Report, Assessments, and the Assessment Diagram herein have been prepared and computed in accordance with the order of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Assessment Law. Mark A. Steuer, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2011 /12 P128 INTRODUCTION Reason for Assessment Approval of the assessment covered by this Engineer's Report will generate the revenue necessary to: Provide for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements described in this Engineer's Report. Maintenance may include but is not limited to, all of the following: the repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement, providing for the life, growth, health and beauty of the landscaping, including cultivation, irrigation, trimming, spraying, fertilizing or treating for disease or injury, the removal of trimming, rubbish, debris and other solid waste, the maintenance, repair and replacement as necessary of all irrigation systems and the removal of graffiti from walls immediately adjacent to the cultivated areas. Servicing means the furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operating and servicing of any improvement. Servicing shall also include vehicle, equipment, capital improvements and administrative costs associated with the annual administration and operation of the District. Process for Annual Assessment The City cannot levy and collect annual assessments within the District without complying with the procedures specified in the 1972 Act. On an annual basis, an Engineer's Report must be prepared which contains a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the district. The City Council must also adopt a resolution of intention which: • Declares the intention of the City Council to levy and collect assessments within the assessment district for the fiscal year stated therein. • Generally describes the existing and proposed improvements and any substantial changes proposed to be made in existing improvements. • Refers to the assessment district by its distinctive designation and indicate the general location of the district. • Refers to the report of the engineer, on file with the clerk, for a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the district. • Gives notice of the time and place for public hearing by the City Council on the levy of the proposed assessment. • States whether the assessment is proposed to increase from the previous year. If the assessments are to be levied in the same or lesser amounts than the maximum assessment amount approved, the clerk shall give notice by causing the resolution of intention to be published. Any interested person may, prior to the conclusion of the public hearing, file a written protest which shall state all grounds of objection. The protest shall contain a description sufficient to identify the property owned by the property owner filing the protest. During the course or upon conclusion of the hearing, the City Council may order changes in any of the matters provided in the report, including changes in the improvements, any zones within the assessment district, and the proposed diagram or the proposed assessment. The City Council, upon conclusion of the public hearing must then adopt a resolution confirming the diagram and assessment, either as originally proposed or as changed by it. The adoption of the resolution shall constitute the levv of an assessment for the fiscal year referred to in the assessment. Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2011112 P129 If the assessment to be.levied exceeds the maximum assessment amount previously approved, the City must comply with the procedures specified in Article XIII D and Proposition 218. The voters in the State of California in November 1996 added Article XIII D to the California Constitution imposing, among other requirements, the necessity for the City to conduct an assessment ballot procedure to enable the owners of each property on which assessments are proposed to be enacted or increased, the opportunity to express their support for, or opposition to the proposed assessment or increase in such assessment. The basic steps of the assessment ballot procedure are outlined below. The City must prepare a Notice of Public Hearing ("Notice"), which describes, along with other mandated information, the reason for the proposed assessments, and to provide a date and time of a public hearing to be held on the matter. The City must also prepare an assessment ballot, which clearly gives the property owner the ability to sign and mark their assessment ballot either in favor of, or in opposition to the proposed assessment. The Notice and assessment ballot are mailed to each affected property owner within the District a minimum of 45 days prior to the public hearing date as shown in the Notice. The City may also hold community meetings with the property owners to discuss the issues facing the District and to answer property owner questions directly. After the Notice and assessment ballot are mailed, property owners are given until the close of the public hearing, stated in the Notice, to return their signed and marked assessment ballot. During the public hearing, property owners are given the opportunity to address the City Council and ask questions or voice their concerns. At the public hearing, the returned assessment ballots received prior to the close of the public hearing are tabulated, weighted by the proposed assessment amount on each property and the results are announced by the City Council. Article XIII D provides that if, as a result of the assessment ballot proceeding, a majority protest is found to exist, the City Council shall not have the authority to levy and collect the assessments as proposed. A majority protest exists if the assessments represented by ballots submitted in opposition exceed those submitted in favor of the assessment. All returned ballots are tabulated and weighted according to the financial obligation of each particular parcel. If there is no majority protest as described above, the City Council may approve the proposed assessments. If there is a majority protest, as described above, the City will not levy and collect any assessments. Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2011 /12 P130 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS The District provides for the administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing of various improvements located within the public right-of-way and dedicated easements within the boundaries of the District. Description of the Boundaries of the District The District is located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California. The boundaries of the District are generally described as that area of the City which is not located within the City's planned development communities. The District is made up of various landscaped sites throughout the City. As such, the parcels within the District do not represent a distinct district area as do the other LMDs within the City. Typically parcels have been annexed to the District as they have developed. Reference is also made to the Assessment Diagram included in this Report. Description of Improvements and Services The improvements are the maintenance and servicing of landscaping sites and appurtenant facilities throughout the District. The various landscaping sites that are maintained consist of parkways, median islands; street trees, paseos and community trails located within street right-of-ways and dedicated public easements which are within the boundaries of the District. The landscaping maintenance includes, but is not limited to, shrubs, turf, tree trimming in irrigated City parkways and paseos, weed and pest control, landscape irrigation systems and testing, trash, debris and graffiti removal, and associated appurtenant facilities. Services include personnel, materials, contracting services, utilities, and all necessary costs associated with the maintenance, replacement and repair required to keep the improvements in a healthy, vigorous and satisfactory condition. In addition, it is the City's intention to continue to use cost effective materials, including the future ability to replace landscaping with drought resistant or low water use plants, in order to lower expenses of the District. The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows: Parks: Bear Gulch Park, East and West Beryl park, Old Town Park, Church Street Park, Golden Oaks Park, Hermosa Park, Lions Park, Napa Park, Don TiburcioTapia Park. Site # Descriotive Location A-1 The north and south side of Wilson from Hellman to Amethyst. Ground Cover area: 22,982 square feet Hardscape area: 5,694 square feet A-2 The east side of Hellman from 326 feet south of Pepperidge to 73 feet north of Pepperidge. Ground Cover area: 5,810 square feet Hardscape area: 1,600 square feet A-3 The south side of 19th Street from 62 feet east of Mayberry to 173 feet east of Mayberry. Ground Cover area: 1,680 square feet Hardscape area: 440 square feet A-4 The south side of Wilson from Amethyst to Archibald; the planters and cutouts on the west side of Archibald from Wilson to 105 feet south of Cottonwood. Ground Cover area: 5,625 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2011/12 P131 A-5 The north and south side of Diamond Court from Klusman to Diamond Ave. Ground Cover area: 3,143 squarefeet Hardscape area: 1,864 square feet A-6 The parkway on the north side of Wilson from 348 feet east of Morning Canyon to Alder Ridge. Ground Cover area: 5,700 square feet Hardscape area: 4,760 square feet A-7 The cutouts and vines on the south side of Wilson from the Alta Loma Channel to 240 feet east of Zapata. Ground Cover area: 911 square feet A-8 The east side of Broken Star from 80' south of Highland to Highland; the north side of Highland from Amethyst to Broken Star including wood chip area north of sidewalk, the south side of Highland from Broken Star to Amethyst; the west side of Amethyst from 140 feet south of Highland to 265 feet south of Highland. Ground Cover area: 6,545 square feet Hardscape area: 2,554 square feet Mulchscape area: 14,005 square feet A-9 The south side of Highland from Hellman to Broken Star. Ground Cover area: 7,865 square feet A-10 The south side of 19th from 170 feet west of Pilgrim to 167 feet east of Pilgrim. Ground Cover area: 1,808 square feet Hardscape area: 1,084 squarefeet A-11 The east side of Amethyst from Lemon to 230 feet north of Apricot Ground Cover area: 2,115 squarefeet Hardscape area: 3,438 square feet A-12 The west side of Sapphire from 710 feet north of Hillside to Hillside. Ground Cover area: 4,500 square feet A-13 The south side of Victoria from 110 feet west of London to Ramona. Ground Cover area: 2,705 square feet Hardscape area: 3,480 squarefeet A-14 The west side of Archibald from 273 feet north of La Gloria to Lemon; the La Gloria median from Archibald to Jadeite; the north and south side of La Gloria from Archibald to 53 feet east of Jadeite; the north side of Lemon from Archibald to 55 feet east of Klusman. Ground Cover area: 12,880 square feet Hardscape area: 12,030 square feet A-15 The planters and cutouts on the east side of Archibald from 610 feet south of Cottonwood to Wilson; the south side of Wilson from Archibald to Alta Loma Channel. Ground Cover area: 2,110 square feet A-16 The cutouts and planters on the east side of Archibald from Banyan to 190 feet north of Sunflower. Ground Cover area: 1,580 square feet A-17 The cutouts and planters on the west side of Archibald from 225 feet south of Wilson to Banyan. Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 6 Fiscal Year 2011/12 P132 Ground Cover area: 2,362 square feet A-18 The cutouts and planters on the north side of Banyan from Jadeite to 410 feet west of Jadeite. Ground Cover area: 216 square feet A-19 The cutouts and planters on the east side of Amethyst from 192 feet south of Sunflower to Manzanita. Ground Cover area: 4,325 square feet A-20 The west side of Archibald from 210 feet north of La Colina to 230 feet south of Almond; the south side of La Colina from Archibald to Jadeite. Ground Cover area: 17,120 square feet A-21 The planter adjacent to the equestrian trail from Riverwood to Raspberry north of the County flood retention basin that is west of Chaffey College. Ground Cover area: 22,832 square feet A-22 The west side of Haven from Carrari to Vista Grove. Ground Cover area: 4,572 square feet A-23 The west side of Haven from 434 feet north of Manzanita to 258 feet south of Manzanita. Ground Cover area: 48,390 square feet Turf area: 5,868 square feet Hardscape area: 4,581 square feet A-24 The south side of 19th from 286 feet east of Amethyst to 166 feet west of Klusman. Ground Cover area: 5,904 square feet Hardscape area: 2,938 square feet A-25 The equestrian trail and planters on the east side of Hermosa from 421 feet south of Whispering Forest to Sun Valley. Ground Cover area: 17,529 square feet A-26 The west side of Haven from 630 feet north of Wilson to Wilson; the parkway on the north side of Wilson from Haven to Mayberry; the parkway on the east side of Mayberry from Wilson to 382 feet north of Poplar, and the east and west side of Cartilla from Wilson to Poplar. Ground Cover area: 10,243 square feet Mulchscape area: 25,297 square feet A-27 The north side of 19th from Mayberry to 93 feet east of Castle Gate. Ground Cover area: 5,145 square feet Hardscape area: 2,870 square feet A-28 The east side of Hermosa from 360 feet south of Manzanita to Manzanita, and the south side of Manzanita from Hermosa to Raspberry. Ground Cover area: 7,421 square feet Hardscape area: 4,712 square feet A-29 The south side of Wilson from 240 feet west of Timbermist to Hermosa; the west side of Hermosa from Wilson to 213 feet south of Oak Grove. Ground Cover area: 11,184 square feet A-30 The equestrian trail and plant material from the curb to the tract wall on the west side of Hermosa from 118 feet south of Hillside to 160 feet south of Waterford. Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 7 Fiscal Year 2011 /12 P133 Ground Cover area: 12,132 square feet A-31 The south side of Lemon from London to Calle Hermosa. Ground Cover area: 4,404 square feet Hardscape area: 1,800 square feet A-32 The north side of Lemon from-the Alta Loma Channel to London; the east side of London from Lemon to Cypress. Ground Cover area: 4,463 square feet Hardscape area: 3,375 square feet A-33 The parkway on the east side of London from 158 feet north of Banyan to 310 feet north of Banyan. Ground Cover area: 1,029 square feet Hardscape area: 1,160 square feet A-34 The south side of Alta Loma from Mayberry to Revere. Ground Cover area: 2,772 square feet Note: 1,512 square feet of ground cover deleted from this site on 7-00. A-35 The west side of Hermosa from Lemon to 125 feet north of Highland, the parkway on the south side of Lemon from 621 feet west of Hermosa to Hermosa. Ground Cover area: 10,494 square feet Hardscape area: 9,207 square feet Mulchscape area: 2,370 square feet A-36 The south side of Lemon from 385 feet west of Mayberry to Cartilla. Ground Cover area: 4,850 square feet Hardscape area: 4,915 square feet A-37 The south side of Hillside north and south of the equestrian trail from Beryl to 203 feet east of Eastwood. Ground Cover area: 4,900 square feet A-38 The median in the 9200 block of Monte Vista Ground Cover area: 500 square feet Hardscape area: 1,800 square feet A-39 The south side of Almond from Henry to Sapphire; the west side of Sapphire from Almond to 255 feet south of Bella Vista. Ground Cover area: 6,926 square feet A-40 The parkway on the east side of Jasper from Hunter to Highland; the parkway on the south side of Highland from Jasper to Carnelian; the west side of Carnelian from Highland to 210 feet south of Highland. Ground Cover area: 14,858 square feet Hardscape area: 6,040 square feet A-41 The west side of Sapphire from 236 feet north of Thoroughbred to Banyan. Ground Cover area: 1,784 square feet Hardscape area: 812 square feet A-42 The parkway on the west side of Beryl from 132 feet north of Sunflower to 23 feet north of Sunflower; and from Sunflower to Banyan. Ground Cover area: 4,735 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2011/12 P134 Hardscape area: 5,772 square feet A-43 The north side of Base Line from Topaz to the Cucamonga Creek Channel. Ground Cover area: 4,563 square feet Hardscape area: 1,890 square feet A-44 The cutouts on the west side of Sapphire from Banyan to Marble. Ground Cover area: 7,300 square feet A-45 The mainline for this site was connected to A-46 9-8-99. A-46 The south side of Banyan from North star to Zircon. Ground Cover area: 7,448 square feet Hardscape area: 7,890 square feet A-47 The cutouts and vines on the north side of Banyan from 180 feet east of Zircon to 186 feet west of Vineyard. Ground Cover area: 1,300 square feet A-48 The parkway on the west side of Beryl from 452 feet north of Cielito; 158 feet south of Cielito and the easement between 9063 and 9073 Cielito from Cielito to 170 feet south of Cielito. Ground Cover area: 6,916 square feet Hardscape area: 2,440 square feet A-49 The east side of Carnelian from 662 feet south of Banyan to Banyan; the south side of Banyan from Carnelian to Northstar. Ground Cover area: 5,906 square feet Hardscape area: 6,972 square feet A-50 The north side of Almond from Sapphire to Crest View; the east and west side of Skyline from Almond to 595 feet north of Almond. Ground Cover area: 17,600 square feet Hardscape area: 8,680 square feet A-51 The planter adjacent to the equestrian trail; from Haven to Riverwood, north of County flood retention basin, west of Chaffey College. The west side of Haven from 400 feet north of Amber to 270 feet south of Amber. Ground Cover area: 37,977 square feet Hardscape area: 5,458 square feet A-52 The east side of Riverwood, from 188 feet south of Charwood to 193 feet north of Charwood. Ground Cover area: 2,750 square feet Hardscape area: 1,698 square feet A-53 The west side of Jasper from Hunter to Highland. The south side of Highland from Jasper to 308 feet west of Sard. The east and westside of Sard from Highland to Hunter. Ground Cover area: 7,445 square feet Hardscape area: 4,740 square feet A-54 The west side of Beryl from 233 feet north of Mignonette to Mignonette. Ground Cover area: 2,637 square feet Hardscape area: 932 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2011 /12 P135 A-55 The north side of 19'h from Cartilla to Mayberry. The east side of Mayberry from 19th to Heather. Ground Cover area: 8,410 square feet Hardscape area: 5,060 square feet A-56 The east side of Beryl from 410 feet north of Wilson to Wilson The north side of Wilson from Beryl to 731 feet west of Buckthorn. The south side of Wilson from Buckthorn to Beryl. Ground Cover area: 19,708 square feet Hardscape area: 5,436 square feet A-57 The east side of Hermosa From 115 north of Coca To 451 feet north of Coca. The trail north of water retention basin from Hermosa to 619 feet east of Hermosa. Ground Cover area: 9,406 square feet Hardscape area: 6,794 square feet A-58 The west side of Haven from 510 feet south of Victoria to 1005 feet south of Victoria. Ground Cover area: 7,301 square feet Hardscape area: 4,790 square feet A-59 The east side of Archibald from 820 feet south of Lemon to 448 feet south of Lemon and continues from 275 feet south of Lemon to 185 feet south of Lemon. Ground Cover area: 4,777 square feet Hardscape area: 5,041 square feet A-60 The south side of Lemon from 290 feet east of Archibald to London. The West side of London from Lemon to Orange. Ground Cover area: 2,569 square feet Hardscape area: 4,122 square feet A-61 The north side of Carrari from Archibald to London. Ground Cover area: 25,152 square feet Hardscape area: 1,698 square feet A-62 The east side of Archibald from Carrari to 505 feet north of Meadowood. Ground Cover area: 8,626 square feet Hardscape area: 1,824 square feet A-63 The south side of Almond street from Carriage to Almond Ground Cover area: 3,342 square feet Hardscape area: 3,600 square feet A-64 The east side of Beryl from Cottonwood to Wilson. The south side of Wilson from Beryl to 437 feet east of Beryl. The north side of Wilson from Cousins to 474 feet east of Cousins. Ground Cover area: 11,973 square feet Hardscape area: 9,949 square feet A-65 The east side of Archibald from LaGloria to 328 feet north of LaGloria. Ground Cover area: 2,279 square feet Hardscape area: 2,411 square feet A-66 The east side of Hermosa from Waterford to 500 feet north of Waterford. Ground Cover area: 4,695 square feet Hardscape area: 5,947 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 10 Fiscal Year 2011/12 P136 A-67 The south side of 19'" from 220 feet east of Sapphire to Via Serena. Ground Cover area: 3,208 Square feet Hardscape area: 4,158 square feet A-68 The west side of Haven from Hillside to 783 feet south of Hillside. Ground cover area: 3,492 square feet A-69 The north side of Hillside from 27 feet west of Mayberry to 191 feet west of Mayberry. Ground Cover area: 1,002 square feet Hardscape area: 1,605 square feet A-70 The south side of 19'" from 365 feet west of Amethyst to Amethyst. The west side of Amethyst from 19'" to Hedges. Ground Cover area: 6,435 square feet Hardscape area: 7;015 square feet A-71 The west side of Archibald from Hillside to Wilson Avenue. The north side of Wilson, south of the trail fence area from Archibald to 467 feet west of Archibald. Ground Cover area: 9,265 square feet Hardscape area: 2,609 square feet A-72 The south side of Banyan from 420 feet west of Archibald to Archibald. The west side of Archibald from Banyan to 389 feet south of Banyan. Ground cover area: 10,270 square feet Hardscape area: 6,673 square feet A-73 The west side of Beryl from 300 feet north of San Simeon Drive to 130 feet north of San Simeon Drive. Ground Cover area: 1,200 square feet Hardscape area: 600 square feet A-74 The south side of Highland Ave. from Beryl St. to Hellman Ave. Ground cover area: 11,603 square feet A-75 The south side of Highland Ave. from Amethyst St. to 612 feet east of Archibald Ave. Ground cover area: 106,409 square feet Hardscape area: 60,608 square feet A-76 The west side of Archibald from 635 feet north of Hillside to Hillside. The north side of Hillside from Archibald to 770 feet west of Archibald. Ground cover area: 8,859 square feet Hardscape area: 1,389 square feet A-77 The east side of Carnelian from Brilliant Ln. to Wilson including the irrigation cut-outs along trail. The south side of Wilson from Carnelian to 745 feet east of Arabian Dr. The irrigation cut-outs on the north side of Wilson from Carnelian to 775 feet east of Arabian Dr. Ground cover area: 5,101 square feet Hardscape area: 11,322 square feet B-1 The median on Blue Gum from Etiwanda to Blue Gum Court. Ground Cover area: 5,100 square feet B-2 The north side of 19th from Highland to Palm; the west and east side of Alameda from 19th to Ring; the east side of Palm from 19th to Ring. Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 11 Fiscal Year 2011!12 P137 Ground Cover area: 47,397 square feet Hardscape area: 26,285 square feet B-3 The paseo from Sutter Ct. to Deer Creek Channel. Ground Cover area: 294 square feet Hardscape area: 400 square feet B-4 The north side of Banyan from Deer Creek Channel to 355 feet west of Fredericksburg. Ground Cover area: 9,200 square feet Hardscape area: 3,834 square feet B-5 The north side of Lemon from Semillion to 188 feet west of Terracing. Ground Cover area: 14,472 square feet Hardscape area: 3,894 square feet B-6 The north side of Lemon from Barsac to Semillion. Ground Cover area: 15,784 square feet Hardscape area: 3,780 square feet, B-7 The south side of Banyan from Cabernet to 414 feet east of Cabernet. Ground Cover area: 18,814 square feet B-8 The south side of Banyan from Callaway to Muscat. Ground Cover area: 10,505 square feet B-9 The east side of Haven from Banyan to 240 feet north of Banyan; the north side of Banyan from Haven to Merlot. Ground Cover area: 24,975 square feet Hardscape area: 1,356 square feet B-10 The east side of Haven from 400 feet south of Banyan to Banyan; the south side of Banyan from Haven to Callaway. Ground Cover area: 14,548 square feet Hardscape area: 6,348 square feet B-11 The south side of Banyan from Muscat to Cabernet. Ground Cover area: 33,282 square feet B-12 The north side of Lemon from Barsac to 135 feet east of Valinda. Ground Cover area: 13,464 square feet Hardscape area: 4,098 square feet B-13 The south side of 19th from Inyo to 585 feet east of San Benito; the parkways on the east and west side of San Benito from 19th to San Mateo; the east side of Inyo from 19th to paseo south of 19th and the paseo running east from Inyo to Sonora. Ground Cover area: 17,563 square feet Turt area: 3,387 square feet Hardscape area: 14,192 square feet B-14 The paseo from San Benito and Sonora to the Deer Creek Channel Ground Cover area: 2,000 square feet Hardscape area: 540 square feet B-15 The paseo from Stanislaus and Lavine to the Deer Creek Channel. Ground Cover area: 1,040 square feet Hardscape area: 428 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 12 Fiscal Year 2011/12 P138 B-16 The paseo from Inyo to Mendocino Ground Cover area: 225 square feet Hardscape area: 184 square feet B-17 The paseo from Yuba Ct. to Deer Creek Channel. Ground Cover area: 918 square feet Hardscape area: 420 square feet B-18 The south side of Wilson from 377 feet west of Canistel to 1032 feet east of Canistel. Ground Cover area: 6,762 square feet Hardscape area: 8,454 square feet B-19 The east side of Haven from the Southern Pacific Railroad to 341 feet south of Victoria. Ground Cover area: 6,415 square feet Hardscape area: 8,865 square feet B-20 The east side of Haven from 341 feet south of Victoria to Victoria; the south side of Victoria from Haven to 237 feet east of Mango. Ground Cover area: 16,900 square feet Hardscape area: 8,767 square feet B-21 The south side of 19th from Valinda to Inyo. Ground Cover area: 3,900 square feet Hardscape area: 3,700 square feet B-22 The south side of Lemon south of the sidewalk from 188 feet west of Terracina to 284 feet north of Marbella. The parkway on the south side of Lemon from 188 feet west of Terracina to 517 feet north of Marbella. The turt in the parkway at the end of the cul-de- sac on Sonterra Court. The parkway on the north side Lemon from 188 feet west of Terracina to 526 feet south of Terracina. The northside of Lemon north of the sidewalk from 188 feet west of Terracina to 562 feet south of Terracina. The turf in the parkway at the end of the cul-de-sac at Serena Street. Ground Cover area: 17,688 square feet Turf Area: 6,390 square feet Hardscape area: 4,928 square feet B-23 The parkway on the east side of Lemon from 129 feet south of Marbella to 526 feet south of Terracina. The slope On the east side of Lemon east of the sidewalk from 129 feet south of Marbella to 562 feet south of Terracina. The west side of Lemon west of the sidewalk from 284 feet north of Marbella to 129 feet south of Marbella. The parkway on the west side of Lemon from 517 feet north of Marbella to 129 feet south of Marbella. Ground Cover area: 22,531 square feet Hardscape area: 4,468 square feet Note _There was 11,844 square feet of ground cover deleted from this site 7-1-00. B-24 The south side of Highland from 327 feet west Deer Creek Channel to Deer Creek Channel. The paseo from Los Osos to Deer Creek Channel. Ground Cover area: 4,946 square feet Hardscape area: 2,099 square feet B-25 The south side of Banyan from 152 feet west of Cantabria to 930 feet east of Cantabria. Ground Cover area: 16,693 square feet. B-26 The north side of Wilson from 590 feet west of High Meadow Place to 187 feet east of High Meadow Place. Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 13 Fiscal Year 2011/12 P139 Ground Cover area: 4,628 Square feet Hardscape area: 390 square feet B-27 The east side of Have n from 467 feet north of 19th St. to 650 feet north of 19th St. Ground cover area: 3,483 square feet Hardscape area: 6,235 square feet C-1 The north side of 26th from Andover to Hermosa; the east side of Hermosa from 26th to 331 feet north of Concord. Ground Cover area: 12,804 square feet Turf area: 9,423 square feet Hardscape area: 5,532 square feet C-2 The entry monument on the north east and northwest corners of 4th and Archibald. Ground Cover area: 5,860 square feet Turf area: 5,546 square feet Hardscape area: 1,842 square feet C-3 The south side of Base Line from Ramona to 128 feet east of Cambridge. Ground Cover area: 17,262 square feet Hardscape area: 4,865 square feet C-4 "The south side of Base Line from 440 feet west of Ramona to Ramona. Ground Cover area: 6,198 square feet Hardscape area: 2,200 square feet C-5 The south side of Base Line from 340 feet west of Center to 103 feet east of Center. Ground Cover area: 8,850 square feet Hardscape area: 2,215 square feet C-6 The south side of Base Line from Ivy to 105 feet west of Marine. Ground Cover area: 8,080 square feet Hardscape area: 2,475 square feet C-7 The parkway on the north side of Church from 142 feet east of Teak to 230 feet west of Teak. Ground Cover area: 1,813 square feet Hardscape area: 1,650 square feet C-8 The west side of Hermosa from 524 feet north of Palo Alto to 142 feet south of Palo Alto. Ground Cover area: 2,650 square feet Hardscape area: 3,996 square feet C-9 The parkway on the west side of Hermosa from 163 feet north of Ironwood to 145 feet south of Ironwood. Ground Cover area: 1,500 square feet Hardscape area: 1,848 square feet C-10 The entry monument parkway on the south side of Base Line from the western city limit to Alta Cuesta. Ground Cover area: 9,756 square feet Hardscape area: 4,380 square feet C-11 The parkway on the east side of Beryl from Alder to 135 feet north of Culpepper. Ground Cover area: 3,400 square feet Hardscape area: 3,600 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 14 Fiscal Year 2011/12 P140 C-12 The parkway on the east side of Hellman from Tryon to 665 feet north of Tryon. Ground Cover area: 8,280 square feet Hardscape area: 3,325 square feet C-13 The parkway on the west side of Hellman from 500 feet north of Church to Church. Ground Cover area: 2,416 square feet Hardscape area: 3,000 square feet C-14 The east side of Archibald from 196 feet north of Palo Alto to 530 feet north of Palo Alto. Ground Cover area: 4,262 square feet Hardscape area: 1,374 square feet C-15 The north side of San Bernardino from Summerlin to 225' west of Summerlin. Ground Cover area: 1,660 square feet Hardscape area: 710 square feet C-16 The south side of Base Line from 286 feet west of Hermosa to Hermosa. The raised planter on the southwest corner of Base Line and Hermosa. Ground Cover area: 4,190 square feet Hardscape area: 2,320 square feet C-17 The east side of Hellman from 775 feet south of 6th St. to 6th St. The south side of 6th St. from Hellman to Golden Oak Rd. The west side of Golden Oak Rd. from 6th St. to Foxbrook Dr. Ground cover area: 9,058 square feet Hardscape area: 6,387 square feet D-1 The east side of Rochester from Church to Base Line Ground Cover area: 11,126 square feet Turf area: 16,794 square feet . Hardscape area: 17,301 square feet D-2 The east side of Rochester from 146 feet south of Chervil to Church St. Ground Cover area: 11,908 square feet Turf area: 9,950 square feet Hardscape area: 13,263 square feet D-3 The south side of Baseline from Rochester to 600 feet east of Rochester. Ground Cover area: 2,180 square feet Hardscape area: 4,121 square feet D-4 The north and south si des of Church St. from Rochester to 150 feet east of Hyssop Dr. Ground Cover area: 6,340 square feet Hardscape area: 8,887 square feet H-9 The Haven median from the 210 freeway to Alta Loma Drive. Ground cover area: 2,207 square feet H-10 The Haven median from entrance of Haven Village to Amber Lane. Ground Cover area: 4,402 square feet Turt area: 2,566 square feet The total square footage for the Ground Cover improvement is 8,804 and the Turt improvement square footage is 5,131; however, due to the location of the improvements the other half is maintained by the General Fund. Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 15 Fiscal Year 2011/12 P141 H-11 The Haven median from Amber Lane to Olive Street. Ground Cover area: 3,289 square feet Turf area: 1,738 square feet The total square footage for the Ground Cover improvement is 6,577 and the Turf improvement square footage is 3,475; however, due to the location of the improvements the other half is maintained by the General Fund. H-12 The Haven median from Olive Street to 712 feet north of Wilson. Ground Cover area: 4,767 square feet Turf area: 9,950 square feet The total square footage for the Ground Cover improvement is 9,534 and the Turf improvement square footage is 3,933; however, due to the location of the improvements the other half is maintained by the General Fund. H-13 The Haven median. from 19~' Street to the 210 freeway. Ground Cover area: 12,514 square feet FH-18 The Foothill median from East Avenue to 453 feet east of Cornwall Avenue. Ground Cover area: 5,450 square feet Ground cover, shrubs and turf areas that make up parkways, median islands and paseos are maintained under contract by a private landscape maintenance company. Parks are maintained by the City's Park Maintenance Crews. Map of Improvements The following page shows the map of landscaping improvements, including irrigation sites and community trails, to be maintained using District funds. Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 16 Fiscal Year 2011 /12 zQ a 0 s,,,_~. N r O '7 ntl ePUe^y13 }r V ~L ~+ N_ Q ~ CC G d V ~+ _ _ _ ~ , A,, W ~ ~ ....1 ~ 0 '~ ~ ~ ny uaneH Q N N a ntl esouuaH ~m>~- a M N ¢a ^tl Plaq!yord J a ntl uewllaH IS ue!lawe~ 6 e ~Z =O Z ~ 66 1 '/? .~ Wry v Iv u m • ~-o A = m - ; 0 • LL A tl Ise3 m 1 u_ m 1 I o.._o < A 1111 ~ r r~ r U • ~'T 0 A 'mo'o v UU _^ V a A L N Q ~ U •U ' ~'+ wt ~j~ 0 •~U U P^ ~ ~~ n ~/ a~ a 1C~ 0 n KU a n .~ °a a . a ~ m m m g N LL m' rn s~-I ntl lsayaoa ~~ uaH!II!W 0 y uaneH O esouuaN r m ° r -3 mgs° ome ~E~rgo S ntl anor`J oo cEmE°~$~sEoz~SE m ou oemsogs sE 's~EoeL •~ ~~E=E~ ~"vEe°°B~ ~¢0 n_~¢cEomp€ve Em_ _mE~e6sF 9--• amp€~-~_ oorse:oE P743 ESTIMATE OF COSTS The estimated costs of administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing the improvements as described in the Plans and Specifications are summarized below. Each year, as part of the assessment district levy calculation process, the costs and expenses are reviewed and the annual costs are projected for the following fiscal year. District Budget Estimated 2011112 Bud et Personnel Services Regular Payroll $142,250.00 Part-time Salaries 22,400.00 Fringe Benefts 69.060.00 Subtotal Personnel $233,710.00 Operations and Maintenance Operations and Maintenance $66,850.00 O & M Facilities 11,500.00 Vehicle Operations and Maintenance 2,000.00 Equipment Operations and Maintenance 3,800.00 Depreciation of Computer Equipment 440.00 Contract Services 604,300.00 Tree Maintenance 63,260.00 Utilities Telephone Utilities 3,440.00 Water Utilities 247,530.00 Electric Utilities 57,410.00 Assessment Administration 65,020.00 General Overhead ~ 82190.00 Subtotal Operations and Maintenance $1,209,740.00 Capital Expenditures Capital Outlav -Vehicles 5$ .390.00 Subtotal Capital Expenditures $5,390.00 Total Expenditure Budget $1,448,840.00 Total Estimated Assessment $1,189,680.00 Less Anticipated Delinquencies {70.400.001 Total Estimated Revenue $1,119,480.00 Plus Operating Reserve Fund Contribution 329.360.00 Total Expenditure Budget $1,448.840.00 Total Estimated Assessment $1,189,880.00 Total District EBU Counl 12,903.46 Actual Assessment per EBU -Fiscal Year 2011/12 $92.21 Maximum Allowable Assessment er EBU -Fiscal Year 2011/12 92.21 Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 17 Fiscal Year 2011/12 P144 The maximum allowable assessment per EBU listed in the District budget above, is the amount which was approved in 1996/97 and subsequent District annexations. Each year, prior to the assessments being placed on the tax roll, the City will review the budget and determine the amount needed to maintain the improvements for the upcoming fiscal year. The actual assessment per EBU will be based on the estimated costs of maintenance, available fund balance and maximum allowable assessment with the goal of maintaining the improvements in a satisfactory and healthy condition. The actual assessment amount may be lower than the maximum allowable assessment; however it may not exceed the maximum unless the increase is approved by the property owners in accordance with Proposition 218. It is the intent of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to maintain an Operating Reserve which shall not exceed the estimated costs of maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or when the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The reserve balance information for the District is as follows: Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2011 Reserve Fund Balance $738,330.00 Operating Reserve Contribution -Fiscal Year 2011/12 (329,360.00) Operating Reserve Collection -Fiscal Year 2011/12 0.00 Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2012 Reserve Fund Balance $406,970.00 Definitions of Budget Items The following definitions describe the costs and expenses included in the District Budget: Personnel Services Reoular Salaries: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all full-time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Part Time Salaries: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all part time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Frinoe Benefits: This item includes the benefits available to City employees: health care, vacation, sick time, and retirement fund. Operations and Maintenance Contract Services: This item includes the contract costs of a landscape maintenance company responsible for the ongoing maintenance of the District improvements. Tree Maintenance: This item includes the contract costs attributed to maintaining the street trees and other trees throughout the District. Utilities -Water: This item includes the costs to furnish water for the landscaping within the District. Utilities -Electric: This item includes the costs to furnish electricity required for the operation and maintenance of the sprinklers and irrigation controllers. Assessment Administration: This item includes the cost to all particular departments and staff of the City, and consultants for providing the administration, coordination and management of District services, operations, and incidental expenses related to the District. This item also includes creation of an annual engineer's report, resolutions and placing the assessment amounts onto the County tax Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 18 Fiscal Year 2011 /12 P145 roll each year, along with responding to any public inquiries and future Proposition 218 balloting proceedings. General Overhead: This item includes the costs of all departments and staff of the City for providing the coordination of District services, inspections, annual bid management, responding to public concerns, public education, accounting, auditing and procedural matters associated with the District. This item also includes an allocation for general City staff time for administrative functions and systems that provide for a functional and operational assessment district within the City's administrative structure. Capital Expenditures: Capital Projects: This item includes new improvements to further enhance the level and quality of service provided within the boundaries of the District. This may include new monuments, irrigation systems, and other large improvements. Operating Reserve Collection: Operatino Reserve Collection: This item includes the amount to be collected to maintain reserves to enable the City to pay for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or whenever the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The Reserve Fund contribution will continue until such a time the Reserve Fund balance is approximately one half of the annual costs. The fund may be allowed to accumulate in anticipation of any unforeseen expenses not included in the yearly maintenance costs. This may include, but is not limited to, tree replacements, repair of damaged equipment due to vandalism, storms and other similar events. Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 19 Fiscal Year 2011/12 P146 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT General Pursuant to the 1972 Act and Article XIII D, all parcels that have a special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements and services shall be identified, and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel shall be determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of improvements. The 1972 Act, permits the establishment of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include the operation, maintenance and servicing of landscaping improvements. Section 22573 of the 1972 Act requires that maintenance assessments must be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. This Section states: "The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district maybe apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements." The determination of whether or not a lot or parcel will benefit from the improvements shall be made pursuant to the Improvement Act of 1911 (Division 7 (commencing with Section 5000) (of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California]." The 1972 Act also permits the designation of zones of benefit within any individual assessment district if "by reasons or variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive different degrees of benefit from the improvement" (Sec. 22547). Article XIII D, Section 4(a) of the California Constitution limits the amount of any assessment to the proportional special benefit conferred on the property. Article XIII D also provides that publicly owned properties must be assessed unless there is clear and convincing evidence that those properties receive no special benefit from the assessment. Exempted from the assessment would be the areas of public streets, public avenues, public lanes, public roads, public drives, public courts, public alleys, public easements and rights-of-ways, public greenbelts and public parkways. The net amount to be assessed may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels. Proposition 218, approved by the voters in November 1996, requires the City to separate general benefit from special benefit, where only special benefit is assessed. Benefit The maintenance and servicing of the improvements within the District (which are described in the Description of Services and Improvements Section of this report) are for the benefit of the properties within the District, and as such confer a special and direct benefit to parcels within the District by: • improving the livability, appearance, and desirability for properties within the boundaries of the District, and • ensuring that improvements do not reach a state of deterioration or disrepair so as to be materially detrimental to properties within the District, and Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 20 Fiscal Year 2011 /12 P147 • providing beautification, shade and overall enhancement to properties within the District. The above mentioned items affect the assessed property in a way that is particular and distinct from their effect on other parcels and that real property in general and the public at large do not share. They contribute to a specific enhancement of the properties within the District. Since these improvements, including the community trails, were installed and are maintained specifically for the properties within the District; only properties within the District receive a special benefit and are assessed for said maintenance. General Benefit In addition to the special benefits received by parcels within the District, there are derivative general benefits that are conferred on parcels outside the boundaries of the District which include: the control of dust and insect infestations, and the visual enhancement of the area to persons or vehicles that may travel through the District. However it has been determined that these benefits are derivative and do not provide a direct benefit to parcels outside of the district that are not being assessed. Method of Assessment Spread Each of the parcels within the District is deemed to receive special benefit from the improvements. Each parcel that has a special benefit conferred upon it as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements are identified and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel is determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of the improvements. When the District was formed in 1979, Article XIII D and Proposition 218 had not yet been passed. Upon the passage of Article XIII D and the subsequent passage of the Proposition Omnibus Implementation Act, new rules were put into place. Due to the changes in legal requirements, as property annexed to the District after the passage of the Assessment Law, the description of the method of assessment became more refined, however, the assessment per parcel has remained the same since the 1996/97 Fiscal Year. Further, no parcel included in the District formation or annexations prior to when the language was refined, are now being levied differently than they were at the time the District was formed or the parcels were annexed. To assess special benefit appropriately, it is necessary to relate the different type of parcel improvements to each other. The Equivalent Benefit Unit ("EBU") method of apportionment uses the single family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single family home equals one Equivalent Benefit Unit (EBU). Every other land-use is converted to EBUs based on an assessment formula that equates to the property's specific development status, type of development (land-use), and size of the property, as compared to a single family home. Vacant parcels are assigned an EBU value of 0.25 per acre because they receive a lesser benefit from the improvements until such time as development occurs. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land-use types, as assigned by County use code, to determine each parcel's EBU assignment. Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 21 Fiscal Year 2011/12 P148 Land-Use Equivalent Dwelling Units Pro ert T e Coun Use Code EBU Value Multi tier Single Family Residential 1.00 Dwelling Unit Multi-Family Residential 0.50 Dwelling Unit Non-Residential 2.00 Acre The use of the latest County Assessor's Secured Roll shall be the basis for the Property Type determination and units/acreage assignments, unless better data is available to the City. In addition, if any parcel within the District is identified by the County Auditor/Controller to be an invalid parcel number for the current fiscal year, the Property Type and EBU assignment shall be based on the correct parcel number and/or new parcel number(s) County use code and subsequent property information. If a single parcel has changed to multiple parcels, the EBU assignment and assessment amount applied to each of the new parcels will be recalculated rather than spread the proportionate share of the original assessment. The following table summarizes the Fiscal Year 2011/12 maximum allowable assessment rates for the District: Property Type (County Use Code) Maximum Allowable Assessment Rate er EBU Actual Assessment Rate er EBU Total UnitslAcres Total EBUs Single Family Residential $92.21 $92.21 7,826.00 7,826.00 Multi-Family Residential 92.21 92.21 10,127.00 5,063.50 Non-Residential 92.21 92.21 14.30 28.60 The total amount of maintenance and incidental costs for maintaininxd the landscaping and community trail improvements is assessed to the individual parcels of real property within the District in proportion to the special benefit received by such parcels of real property. The proposed individual assessments are shown on the assessment roll in this report. Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 22 Fiscal Year 2011/12 P149 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM An Assessment Diagram for the District is shown on the following page. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the County Assessor of the County San Bernardino, at the time this report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Engineer's Report. Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 23 Fiscal Year 2011/12 P150 ~~ •- w_ .y ^C W .~ Q V C J ny ua>I!II!W ny uaneH ny esowJaH nV PIeQ!4oJb' ny uewllaH ~ lg ue!lawe~ c 0 ~_ ny epuenny3 >IaaJ~ nea ny Ja~sayooa ~ ~ ~ ~ N U C y m o~ U~ U x ny lway~ v N C _ J m ~ N L 3 ~ o m 0 ° ~ u . Q ' N J J~ O ~ ~ U ~ ~ ~ J , r n`d lse3 in N N 0 0 N O r v ~ ny epuern!~3 ny Jalsayooa ny ua>I!II!W ny uaneH ny esowJaH nV PIe9!4oJV ~ ny uewllaH ~ r L ~ ny pJe%au!n 0' V) c L J rn ~ r y (0 m nt/ anOJ~ m D_' V) = 3 L p ap O Q V_ :pea= €He~t ::~ >J Pia ~~~ L c EEi P751 ASSESSMENT ROLL Assessment Roll The assessment roll is a listing of the assessment for Fiscal Year 2011/12 apportioned to each lot or parcel, as shown on the last equalized roll of the Assessor of the County of San Bernardino. The following tables summarize the Fiscal Year 2011/12 maximum and actual assessments for the District: Property Type (County Use Code Maximum Allowable Assessment Rate er EBU Total UnitslAcres Total EBUs Maximum Allowable Assessment Single Family Residential $92.21 7,826.00 7,826.00 $721,635.46 Multi-Family Residential 92.21 10,127.00 5,063.50 466,905.34 Non-ResidentialNacant 92.21 6.98 13.96 1,287.25 TOTALS 17,959.96 12,903.46 $1,169,828.05 Property Type (County Use Code Actual Assessment Rate er EBU Total Units/Acres Total EBUs Actual Assessment Single Family Residential $92.21 7,826.00 7,826.00 $721,631.46 Multi-Family Residential 92.21 10,127.00 5,063.50 466,905.34 Non-ResidentialNacant 92.21 6.98 13.96 1,287.25 TOTALS 17,959.98 12,903.46 $1,189,828.05 A copy of the full assessment roll is available for review in the City Clerk's office. Annexations The following annexations are effective for the 2011/12 Fiscal Year: Assessor's Parcel Annexation Total Total Property Type Number Date Pro'ect Units/Acres EBUs Coun Use Code 0229-041-10 10/21/2009 DRC2006-00540 225 112.50 Multi-Family Residential Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 24 Fiscal Year 2011/12 P152 Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2011/2012 City of Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 3A (Hyssop) P153 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3A (HYSSOP MAINTENANCE DISTRICT) 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Phone: 909.477.2740 Fax: 909.477.2741 CITY COUNCIL L. Dennis Michael, Mayor Sam Spagnolo, Mayor Pro Tem William Alexander, Council Member Chuck Buquet, Council Member Diane Williams, Council Member CITY STAFF John R. Gillison, Assistant City Manager Linda D. Daniels, Deputy City Manager William Wittkopf, Public Works Director Ingrid Y. Bruce, GIS/Special Districts Manager Christopher Bopko, Management Analyst III P154 TABLE OF CONTENTS ENGINEER'S LETTER INTRODUCTION 1 3 Reason for Assessment .............................................................................................3 Process for Annual Assessment ......................................:..........................................3 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS 5 Description of the Boundaries of the District ...............................................................5 Description of Improvements and Services ................................................................5 Map of Improvements .................................................................................................5 ESTIMATE OF COSTS 6 District Budget ............................................................................................................6 Definitions of Budget Items .........................................................................................7 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT 9 General .......................................................................................................................9 Special Benefit ...........................................................................................................9 General Benefit ........................................................................................................10 Method of Assessment Spread ................................................................................10 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM ASSESSMENT ROLL 12 13 Assessment Roll .......................................................................................................13 Annexations ..............................................................................................................13 P155 ENGINEER'S LETTER WHEREAS, on July 6, 2011, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga (the "City"), under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 (the "1972 Act") adopted its Resolution No. 11-098, a Resolution Initiating Proceedings for the Levy of Annual Assessments for Landscape Maintenance District No. 3A (Hyssop Maintenance District) (the "District"); and WHEREAS, the Resolution Initiating Proceedings directed staff to prepare and file an Engineer's Report for Fiscal Year 2011/12 pursuant to the requirements of the 1972 Act. The Engineer's Report presents the plans and specifications describing the general nature, location and extent of the improvements to be maintained, an estimate of the costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements for the District for the referenced fiscal year, a diagram for the District, showing the area and properties proposed to be assessed, and an assessment of the estimated costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing the improvements, assessing the net amount upon all assessable lots and/or parcels within the District in proportion to the special benefit received; and NOW THEREFORE, the following assessment is proposed to be authorized in order to pay the estimated costs of maintenance, operation and servicing of the improvements to be paid by the assessable real property within the boundaries of the District in proportion to the special benefit received. The following table summarizes the proposed assessment. SUMMARY OF ASSESSMENT Fiscal Year 2011/12 Total Estimated Assessment $3,720.00 Plus Anticipated Delinquency Penalty 520.00 Total Estimated Revenue $4,240.00 Plus Reserve Fund Contribution 600.00 Total Expenditure Budget $4,840.00 Total District EBU Count 9.00 Actual Assessment per EBU $413.74 Maximum Allowable Assessment per EBU $413.74 In making the assessments contained herein pursuant to the 1972 Act: I have identified all parcels which will have a special benefit conferred upon them from the improvements described in the Special Benefit Section of this Engineer's Report (the "Specially Benefted Parcels"). For particulars as to the identification of said parcels, reference is made to the Assessment Diagram, a copy of which is included in this Engineer's Report. 2. I have evaluated the costs and expenses of the improvements upon the Specially Benefited Parcels. In making such evaluation: Landscape Maintenance District No. 3A -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2011 /12 P156 a. The proportionate special benefit derived by each Specially Benefited Parcel from the improvements was determined in relationship to the entirety of the maintenance costs of the improvements; b. No assessment has been imposed on any Specially Benefited Parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on such parcel from the improvements; and c. Any general benefits from the improvements have been separated from the special benefits and only special benefits have been assessed. I, the undersigned, respectfully submit the enclosed Engineer's Report and, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, the Engineer's Report, Assessments, and the Assessment Diagram herein have been prepared and computed in accordance with the order of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Assessment Law. Mark A. Steuer, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Landscape Maintenance District No. 3A -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2011/12 P157 INTRODUCTION Reason for Assessment Approval of the assessment covered by this Engineer's Report will generate the revenue necessary to: Provide for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements described in this Engineer's Report. Maintenance may include but is not limited to, all of the following: the repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement, providing for the life, growth, health and beauty of the landscaping, including cultivation, irrigation, trimming, spraying, fertilizing or treating for disease or injury, the removal of trimming, rubbish, debris and other solid waste, the maintenance, repair and replacement as necessary of all irrigation systems and the removal of graffiti from walls immediately adjacent to the cultivated areas. Servicing means the furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operating and servicing of any improvement. Servicing shall also include vehicle, equipment, capital improvements and administrative costs associated with the annual administration and operation of the District. Process for Annual Assessment The City cannot levy and collect annual assessments within the District without complying with the procedures specified in the 1972 Act. On an annual basis, an Engineer's Report must be prepared which contains a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the district. The City Council must also adopt a resolution of intention which: • Declares the intention of the City Council to levy and collect assessments within the assessment district for the fiscal year stated therein. • Generally describes the existing and proposed improvements and any substantial changes proposed to be made in existing improvements. • Refers to the assessment district by its distinctive designation and indicate the general location of the district. Refers to the report of the engineer, on file with the clerk, for a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the district. • Gives notice of the time and place for public hearing by the City Council on the levy of the proposed assessment. • States whether the assessment is proposed to increase from the previous year. If the assessments are to be levied in the same or lesser amounts than the maximum assessment amount approved, the clerk shall give notice by causing the resolution of intention to be published. Any interested person may, prior to the conclusion of the public hearing, file a written protest which shall state all grounds of objection. The protest shall contain a description sufficient to identify the property owned by the property owner filing the protest. During the course or upon conclusion of the hearing, the City Council may order changes in any of the matters provided in the report, including changes in the improvements, any zones within the assessment district, and the proposed diagram or the proposed assessment. The Ciry Council, upon conclusion of the public hearing must then adopt a resolution confirming the diagram and assessment, either as originally proposed or as chariged by it. The adoption of the resolution shall constitute the levy of an assessment for the fiscal year referred to in the assessment. Landscape Maintenance District No. 3A -City of Rancho Cucamonga 3 Fiscal Year 2011/12 P158 If the assessment to be levied exceeds the maximum assessment amount previously approved, the City must comply with the procedures specified in Article XIIID and Proposition 218. The voters in the State of California in November 1996 added Article XIIID to the California Constitution imposing, among other requirements, the necessity for the City to conduct an assessment ballot procedure to enable the owners of each property on which assessments are proposed to be enacted or increased, the opportunity to express their support for, or opposition to the proposed assessment or increase in such assessment. The basic steps of the assessment ballot procedure are outlined below. The City must prepare a Notice of Public Hearing ("Notice"), which describes, along with other mandated information, the reason for the proposed assessments, and to provide a date and time of a public hearing to be held on the matter. The City must also prepare an assessment ballot, which clearly gives the property owner the ability to sign and mark their assessment ballot either in favor of, or in opposition to the proposed assessment. The Notice and assessment ballot are mailed to each affected property owner within the District a minimum of 45 days prior to the public hearing date as shown in the Notice. The City may also hold community meetings with the property owners to discuss the issues facing the District and to answer property owner questions directly. After the Notice and assessment ballot are mailed, property owners are given until the close of the public hearing, stated in the Notice, to return their signed and marked assessment ballot. During the public hearing, property owners are given the opportunity to address the City Council and ask questions or voice their concerns. At the public hearing, the returned assessment ballots received prior to the close of the public hearing are tabulated, weighted by the proposed assessment amount on each property and the results are announced by the City Council. Article XIIID provides that if, as a result of the assessment ballot proceeding, a majority protest is found to exist, the City Council shall not have the authority to levy and collect the assessments as proposed. A majority protest exists if the assessments represented by ballots submitted in opposition exceed those submitted in favor of the assessment. All returned ballots are tabulated and weighted according to the financial obligation of each particular parcel. If there is no majority protest as described above, the City Council may approve the proposed assessments. If there is a majority protest, as described above, the City will not levy and collect any assessments. Landscape Maintenance District No. 3A -City of Rancho Cucamonga 4 Fiscal Year 2011/12 P159 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS The District provides for the administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing of various improvements located within the public right-of-way and dedicated easements within the boundaries of the District. Description of the Boundaries of the District The District is located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California. The boundaries of the District are generally described as that area of the City South and East of Hyssop Drive south of 6'" Street. Reference is also made to the Assessment Diagram included in this Report. Description of Improvements and Services The improvements are the maintenance and servicing of landscaping sites and appurtenant facilities throughout the District. The landscaping maintenance includes, but is not limited to, shrubs, turt, tree trimming, weed and pest control, landscape irrigation systems and testing, trash, debris and graffiti removal, and associated appurtenant facilities. Services include personnel, materials, contracting services, utilities, and all necessary costs associated with the maintenance, replacement and repair required to keep the improvements in a healthy, vigorous and satisfactory condition. In addition, it is the City's intention to continue to use cost effective materials, including the future ability to replace landscaping with drought resistant or low water use plants, in order to lower expenses of the District. The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows: Site # Descriptive Location J-1 The west side of Hyssop from south of 6`" street to the south end of the cul-de-sac. Ground Cover area: 6,050 square feet. Map of Improvements The following page shows the map of landscaping improvements, including irrigation sites and community trails, to be maintained using District funds. Landscape Maintenance District No. 3A -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2011/12 Z N I IL_ _ _ _. _.. .. ... ..- --. ._ __ __. ___...._ I .. ---._ .... ._ ..._. _ . _. _. .. _... ._ K ~ gg 5 o rlov. a ~ w z ~ - w o. J w z z ~ r ~ g J O J O N Y N (a7 "- Ca'l Y O W m U ~ a ~ a ~ ~ ~ nna o ; I , ~ ~ ;~l_1 - ~.~ - i ~ - _. .I ' __. .. _ . i _.._ .; __ - - I _j.. I_ , .% ~ j I --~ I I I _ .. I , I ?'.ya , I i I ~ ' i ~ ,, 1:',~?~ , I ~ ~ j O ' ~ ~~ I ~ ~ ' - ~ ~ ~ ~ N I ; ~ ~ ___ ~ i ~ i `1~1 c _-. .._ T_ i _- ~ I __ ._ .. _~-_ .i .~_- _. __. __. _' . .. ,_ __ __ ..._ _ .. _.._..-_~. _ '____i' • O y~ ~_ I -- 15.ONRP. ~- I I 1 Q ~i ~,.~ . I; ~ o~ ~ I ,. . ~ '~ t ~~ ~ I ~ ~ j ` ~ t~ p - I ~ ~ , _ _ _ da do MdSLI L C ~ o ~ _ r ~~ I ~~ ~ I ~ '~ ~ danio sL I .~ Q ~ - I ~ ~ ~ i I I ~ ~ i I G ~ O i ~ ~ ` ~. I - I . t ~ ~ ~' ! O i I ~I I I i I ~ ~ O t I I ~ I V 1. i i ~ j ~ 1.. I A _I 1 _ _ - ~J .~/ ~ ~ ~ I J ~ ~ ~ I' ~~ ~~ g I ` ` ~ ~ ~ j I ~o$ ~~a€ a og~voes ~ , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ $o~a~te= S C ' ` I i j ! ~- ' I ' I .j o os ~ goo ~ 5 ` E a - 38 I ~ ' - .. -i _ H I ~ y ~. y v_ tl _ E2oEFmr aE.omeec ' ~ _ ~ @ & eu ~ ~g~ EE I ~ li i ~ 2 SS ~ ~ E I' $ P [ m ~ " I I I i ..i + _ qsa°~cs oze m~^,=g~~ i , VO I I ~~~ I ~ t ~' i ~ ~ ._. I &rc Ba m& ~~ s E C ~~ Qi ~ I I ~ ~ I r I p S€ ~ g ~ e y o u t a ~ a~ y~ f , I I o P161 ESTIMATE OF COSTS The estimated costs of administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing the improvements as described in the Plans and Specifications are summarized below. Each year, as part of the assessment district levy calculation process, the costs and expenses are reviewed and the annual costs are projected for the following fiscal year. District Estimated 2077112 Bud et Personnel Services Regular Payroll $0.00 Part-time Salaries 0.00 Fringe Benefits 0.00 Subtotal Personnel $0.00 Operations and Maintenance Operations and Maintenance $200.00 Contract Services 3,230.00 Tree Maintenance ~ 0.00 Utilities Water Utilities 500.00 Electric Utilities 600.00 Assessment Administration 50.00 General Overhead 260.00 Subtotal Operations and Maintenance $4,840.00 Capital Expenditures Capital Projects 0.00 Subtotal Capital Expenditures $0.00 Total Expenditure Budget $4,840.00 Total Estimated Assessment $3,720.00 Plus Anticipated Delinquency Penalty 520.00 Total Estimated Revenue $4,240.00 Plus Operating Reserve Fund Contribution 600.00 Total Expenditure Budget $4,840.00 Total Estimated Assessment $3,720.00 Total District EBU Count 9.00 Actual Assessment per EBU -Fiscal Year 2011/12 $413.74 Maximum Allowable Assessment er EBU -Fiscal Year 2011/12 $413.74 The maximum allowable assessment per EBU listed in the District budget above, is the amount which was approved in 1996/97 and subsequent District annexations. Each year, prior to the assessments being placed on the tax roll, the City will review the budget and determine the amount needed to maintain the improvements for the upcoming fiscal year. The actual assessment per EBU will be based on the estimated costs of maintenance, available fund balance and maximum allowable assessment with the goal of maintaining the improvements in a satisfactory and healthy condition. Landscape Maintenance District No. 3A -City of Rancho Cucamonga 6 Fiscal Year 2011/12 P162 The actual assessment amount may be lower than the maximum allowable assessment; however it may not exceed the maximum unless the increase is approved by the property owners in accordance with Proposition 218. It is the intent of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to maintain an Operating Reserve which shall not exceed the estimated costs of maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or when the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The reserve balance information for the District is as follows: Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2011 Reserve Fund Balance $45,050.00 Operating Reserve Contribution -Fiscal Year 2011/12 (600.00) Ooerating Reserve Collection -Fiscal Year 2011/12 0.00 Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2012 Reserve Fund Balance $44,450.00 Definitions of Budget Items The following definitions describe the costs and expenses included in the District Budget Personnel Services Regular Salaries: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all full-time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Part Time Salaries: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all part time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Frinoe Benefits: This item includes the benefits available to City employees: health care, vacation, sick time, and retirement fund. ~~ Operations and Maintenance Contract Services: This item includes the contract costs of a landscape maintenance company responsible for the ongoing maintenance of the District improvements. Tree Maintenance: This item includes the contract costs attributed to maintaining the street trees and other trees throughout the District. Utilities -Water: This item includes the costs to furnish water for the landscaping within the District. Utilities -Electric: This item includes the costs to furnish electricity required for the operation and maintenance of the sprinklers and irrigation controllers. Assessment Administration: This item includes the cost to all particular departments and staff of the City, and consultants for providing the administration, coordination and management of District services, operations, and incidental expenses related to the District. This item also includes creation of an annual engineer's report, resolutions and placing the assessment amounts onto the County tax roll each year, along with responding to any public inquiries and future Proposition 218 balloting proceedings. General Overhead: This item includes the costs of all departments and staff of the City for providing the coordination of District services, inspections, annual bid management, responding to public concerns, public education, accounting, auditing and procedural matters associated with the District. This item also includes an allocation for general City staff time for administrative functions and Landscape Maintenance District No. 3A -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2011112 P163 systems that provide for a functional and operational assessment district within the City's administrative structure. Capital Expenditures: Capital Projects: This item includes new improvements to further enhance the level and quality of service provided within the boundaries of the District. This may include new monuments, irrigation systems, and other large improvements. Operating Reserve Collection: Operating Reserve Collection: This item includes the amount to be collected to maintain reserves to enable the City to pay for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or whenever the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The Reserve Fund contribution will continue until such a time the Reserve Fund balance is approximately one half of the annual costs. The fund may be allowed to accumulate in anticipation of any unforeseen expenses not included in the yearly maintenance costs. This may include, but is not limited to, tree replacements, repair of damaged equipment due to vandalism, storms and other similar events. Landscape Maintenance District No. 3A -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2011/12 P164 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT General Pursuant to the 1972 Act and Article XIIID, all parcels that have a special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements and services shall be identified, and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel shall be determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of improvements. The 1972 Act, permits the establishment of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include the operation, maintenance and servicing of landscaping improvements. Section 22573 of the 1972 Act requires that maintenance assessments must be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. This Section states: "The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district maybe apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots orparcels in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements." The determination of whether or not a lot or parcel will benefit from the improvements shall be made pursuant to the Improvement Act of 1911 (Division 7 (commencing with Section 5000) (of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California]." The 1972 Act also permits the designation of zones of benefit within any individual assessment district if "by reasons or variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive different degrees of benefit from the improvement" (Sec. 22547). Article XIIID, Section 4(a) of the California Constitution limits the amount of any assessment to the proportional special benefit conferred on the property. Article XIIID also provides that publicly owned properties must be assessed unless there is clear and convincing evidence that those properties receive no special benefit from the assessment. Exempted from the assessment would be the areas of public streets, public avenues, public lanes, public roads, public drives, public courts, public alleys, public easements and rights-of-ways, public greenbelts and public parkways. The net amount to be assessed may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels. Proposition 218, approved by the voters in November 1996, requires the City to separate general benefit from special benefit, where only special benefit is assessed. Benefit The maintenance and servicing of the improvements within the District (which are described in the Description of Services and Improvements Section of this report) are for the benefit of the properties within the District, and as such confer a special and direct benefit to parcels within the District by: • improving the livability, appearance, and desirability for properties within the boundaries of the District, and • ensuring that improvements do not reach a state of deterioration or disrepair so as to be materially detrimental to properties within the District, and Landscape Maintenance District No. 3A -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2011112 P165 • providing beautification, shade and overall enhancement to properties within the District. The above mentioned items affect the assessed property in a way that is particular and distinct from their effect on other parcels and that real property in general and the public at large do not share. They contribute to a specific enhancement of the properties within the District. Since these improvements, including the community trails, were installed and are maintained specifically for the properties within the District; only properties within the District receive a special benefit and are assessed for said maintenance. General Benefit In addition to the special benefits received by parcels within the District, there are derivative general benefits that are conferred on parcels outside the boundaries of the District which include: • the control of dust and insect infestations, and • the visual enhancement of the area to persons or vehicles that may travel through the District. However it has been determined that these benefits are derivative and do not provide a direct benefit to parcels outside of the district that are not being assessed. Method of Assessment Each of the parcels within the District is deemed to receive special benefit from the improvements. Each parcel that has a special benefit conferred upon it as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements are identified and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel is determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of the improvements. When the District was formed in 1984, Article XIIID and Proposition 218 had not yet been passed. Upon the passage of Article XIIID and the subsequent passage of the Proposition Omnibus Implementation Act, new rules were put into place. Due to the changes in legal requirements, as property annexed to the District after the passage of the Assessment Law, the description of the method of assessment became more refined, however, the assessment per parcel has remained the same since the 1996(97 Fiscal Year. Further, no parcel included in the District formation or annexations prior to when the language was refined, are now being levied differently than they were at the time the District was formed or the parcels were annexed. To assess special benefit appropriately, it is necessary to relate the different type of parcel improvements to each other. The Equivalent Benefit Unit ("EBU") method of apportionment uses the single family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single family home equals one Equivalent Benefit Unit (EBU). Every other land-use is converted to EBUs based on an assessment formula that equates to the property's specific development status, type of development (land-use), and size of the property, as compared to a single family home. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land-use types, as assigned by County use code, to determine each parcel's EBU assignment. Land-1ldeE uivalentDwellin Units Pro ert T e Count Use Code EBU Value Multi tier Non-Residential 1.00 Parcel Landscape Maintenance District No. 3A-City of Rancho Cucamonga 10 Fiscal Year 2011112 P166 ~¢ The use of the latest County Assessor's Secured Roll shall be the basis for the Property Type determination and units/acreage assignments, unless better data is available to the City. In addition, if any parcel within the District is identified by the County Auditor/Controller to be an invalid parcel number for the current fiscal year, the Property Type and EBU assignment shall be based on the correct parcel number and/or new parcel number(s) County use code and subsequent property information. If a single parcel has changed to multiple parcels, the EBU assignment and assessment amount applied to each of the new parcels will be recalculated rather than spread the proportionate share of the original assessment. The following table summarizes the Fiscal Year 2011/12 maximum allowable assessment rates for the District: Maximum Allowable Property Type Assessment Rate Actual Assessment Total Total (County Use Code) er EBU Rate per EBU Units/Acres EBUs Non-Residential $413.74 $413.74 9 9 The total amount of maintenance and incidental costs for maintaining the landscaping and community trail improvements is assessed to the individual parcels of real property within the District in proportion to the special benefit received by such parcels of real property. The proposed individual assessments are shown on the assessment roll in this report. Landscape Maintenance District No. 3A -City of Rancho Cucamonga 11 Fiscal Year 2011/12 P167 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM An Assessment Diagram for the District is shown on the following page. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the County Assessor of the County San Bernardino, at the time this report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Engineer's Report. Landscape Maintenance District No. 3A -City of Rancho Cucamonga 12 Fiscal Year 2011/12 P168 Eo Q ~ M ~~ w .~ '~_ ~IJ ~ J p Y- a 4 ~ '~.. -- -- ny lway~ a~~i y,r y , v J ~ C 1 ~ ~ _ ry (Q ---- - / G EQi ~ J m ~ o _ ~ ~ r 3 ~ 1 m o ~p o i ~ i ._.._.._.. Q - j nb' ise3 in i ® ~ ~ i ny epuenn!#3 i - ~ ny epuenn!~3 ~ i I ~~~_. %- i j ; i y ~8 ~aaJ~ ~(ea I -,r - ~ ~ i ~. a ,_.._.._.._.._.._.._.y 1 ~ 1 i = ny Ja}sayooa i-_-___ _-- -.---- ~~ ~ i ~ \ ~ i ny Ja3sayooa I J ,~...: ~ ~ / ,~ ,1 i i i 1 _, - i ny ua~!II!W f._.._.._.._.. ~.._-- ~`, I ' ,~ j ny ua~!II!W ~ ~` ~ I ,~ ~ ~ /~ ~ ~~ ~ n uane ~--- - -- - -- - i d H d H~ I 1--- ~ I ~ ~ n uane i ~ ny esowJaH i -- .._ . _ - --~- _ _ 1 ! ny esowJaH i nV Ple9!4oJH ~--- --- ~ -1--- i -- jn e i of ~--~-- i b' PI Q.4 V i ~r _ _I i _ i d II H i TI ~- - --- -I ~,tr=•-• ~ ny uewllaH n uew a 1 I ~ 1 ~~• L L l v j j ~~ I ! ny p eRau!n i 3S uepawe~ i --~--_---- -- --- - - `~ i i ,~ ti /` 3~agi 4g~s / 5%6 ~p r...~...: nt/anOJ~ axg`s.~ga~g~ 3 L nP€€gE~i s ~. .I' p1 L O 00 €~l ~° ~ m LL. ° ~ 'z~a.>eY C =~ ~£. N j, ~~4 _s~rs~as€'E ~ C c 6ef Y8u a£•peg N E6 S:E~~'E°€E° g90 kY Fu 4P x@3 ~~ a~~~48~2e bpi Z~ Ss=~gv2~~~.°g C~ Erg-~~.. E§E'8 P169 ASSESSMENT ROLL Assessment Roll The assessment roll is a listing of the assessment for Fiscal Year 2011/12 apportioned to each lot or parcel, as shown on the last equalized roll of the Assessor of the County of San Bernardino. The following tables summarize the Fiscal Year 2011/12 maximum and actual assessments for the District: Maximum Allowable Maximum Property Type Assessment Rate Total Total Allowable Coun Use Code er EBU UnitslAcres EBUs Assessment Non-Residential $413.74 9 9 $3,723.66 Actual Property Type Assessment Rate Total Total Actual Coun Use Code er EBU UnitslAcres EBUs Assessment Non-Residential $413.74 9 9 $3,723.66 A copy of the full assessment roll is available for review in the City Clerk's office. Annexations There were no annexations effective for the 2011/12 Fiscal Year: Landscape Maintenance District No. 3A -City of Rancho Cucamonga 13 Fiscal Year 2011/12 P170 Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2011/2012 City of Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B (Commercial Industrial) P171 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B (COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL MAINTENANCE DISTRICT) 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Phone: 909.477.2740 Fax: 909.477.2741 CITY COUNCIL L. Dennis Michael, Mayor Sam Spagnolo, Mayor Pro Tem William Alexander, Council Member Chuck Buquet, Council Member Diane Williams, Council Member CITY STAFF John R. Gillison, Assistant City Manager Linda D. Daniels, Deputy City Manager William Wittkopf, Public Works Director Ingrid Y. Bruce, GISISpecial Districts Manager Christopher Bopko, Management Analyst III P172 TABLE OF CONTENTS ENGINEER'S LETTER INTRODUCTION 1 3 Reason for Assessment .............................................................................................3 Process for Annual Assessment .................................................................................3 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS 5 Description of the Boundaries of the District ...............................................................5 Description of Improvements and Services ................................................................5 Map of Improvements .................................................................................................7 ESTIMATE OF COSTS 8 District Budget ............................................................................................................8 Definitions of Budget Items ........................................................................:................9 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT 11 General .....................................................................................................................11 Special Benefit .........................................................................................................11 General Benefit ................................................................................................:.......12 Method of Assessment Spread ................................................................................12 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM ASSESSMENT ROLL 14 15 Assessment Roll .......................................................................................................15 Annexations ..............................................................................................................15 P173 ENGINEER'S LETTER WHEREAS,. on July 6, 2011, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga (the "City"), under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 (the "1972 Act") adopted its Resolution No. 11-098, a Resolution Initiating Proceedings for the Levy of Annual Assessments for Landscape Maintenance District No. 36 (Commercial Industrial Maintenance District) (the "District"); and WHEREAS, the Resolution Initiating Proceedings staff to prepare and file an Engineer's Report for Fiscal Year 2011/12 pursuant to the requirements of the 1972 Act. The Engineer's Report presents the plans and specifications describing the general nature, location and extent of the improvements to be maintained, an estimate of the costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements for the District for the referenced fiscal year, a diagram for the District, showing the area and properties proposed to be assessed, and an assessment of the estimated casts of the maintenance, operations and servicing the improvements, assessing the net amount upon all assessable lots and/or parcels within the District in proportion to the special benefit received; and NOW THEREFORE, the following assessment is proposed to be authorized in order to pay the estimated costs of maintenance, operation and servicing of the improvements to be paid by the assessable real property within the boundaries of the District in proportion to the special benefit received. The following table summarizes the proposed assessment. SUMMARY OF ASSESSMENT Fiscal Year 2011112 Total Estimated Assessment $980,970.00 Less Anticipated Delinquencies 43 650.00 Total Estimated Revenue $937,320.00 Plus Reserve Fund Contribution 434 900.00 Total Expenditure Budget $1,372,220.00 Total District EBU Count 2,780.52 Actual Assessment per EBU $352.80 Maximum Allowable Assessment per EBU $352.80 In making the assessments contained herein pursuant to the 1972 Act: I have identified all parcels which will have a special benefit conferred upon them from the improvements described in the Special Benefit Section of this Engineer's Report (the "Specially Benefited Parcels"). For particulars as to the identification of said parcels, reference is made to the Assessment Diagram, a copy of which is included in this Engineer's Report. 2. I have evaluated the costs and expenses of the improvements upon the Specially Benefited Parcels. In making such evaluation: Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2011/12 P174 a. The proportionate special benefit derived by each Specially Benefited Parcel from the improvements was determined in relationship to the entirety of the maintenance costs of the improvements; b. No assessment has been imposed on any Specially Benefited Parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on such parcel from the improvements; and c. Any general benefts from the improvements have been separated from the special benefits and only special benefits have been assessed. I, the undersigned, respectfully submit the enclosed Engineer's Report and, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, the Engineer's Report, Assessments, and the Assessment Diagram herein have been prepared and computed in accordance with the order of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Assessment Law. Mark A. Steuer, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2011/12 P175 INTRODUCTION Reason for Assessment Approval of the assessment covered by this Engineer's Report will generate the revenue necessary to: Provide for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements described in this Engineer's Report. Maintenance may include but is not limited to, all of the following: the repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement, providing for the life, growth, health and beauty of the landscaping, including cultivation, irrigation, trimming, spraying, fertilizing or treating for disease or injury, the removal of trimming, rubbish, debris and other solid waste, the maintenance, repair and replacement as necessary of all irrigation systems and the removal of graffiti from walls immediately adjacent to the cultivated areas. Servicing means the furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operating and servicing of any improvement. Servicing shall also include vehicle, equipment, capital improvements and administrative costs associated with the annual administration and operation of the District. Process for Annual Assessment The City cannot levy and collect annual assessments within the District without complying with the procedures specified in the 1972 Act. On an annual basis, an Engineer's Report must be prepared which contains a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the district. The City Council must also adopt a resolution of intention which: • Declares the intention of the City Council to levy and collect assessments within the assessment district for the fiscal year stated therein. • Generally describes the existing and proposed improvements and any substaritial changes proposed to be made in existing improvements. • Refers to the assessment district by its distinctive designation and indicate the general location of the district. • Refers to the report of the engineer, on file with the clerk, for a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the district. • Gives notice of the time and place for public hearing by the City Council on the levy of the proposed assessment. • States whether the assessment is proposed to increase from the previous year. If the assessments are to be levied in the same or lesser amounts than the maximum assessment amount approved, the clerk shall give notice by causing the resolution of intention to be published. Any interested person may, prior to the conclusion of the public hearing, file a written protest which shall state all grounds of objection. The protest shall contain a description sufficient to identify the property owned by the property owner filing the protest. During the course or upon conclusion of the hearing, the City Council may order changes in any of the matters provided in the report, including changes in the improvements, any zones within the assessment district, and the proposed diagram or the proposed assessment. The City Council, upon conclusion of the public hearing must then adopt a resolution confirming the diagram and assessment, either as originally proposed or as changed by it. The adoption of the resolution shall constitute the levy of an assessment for the fiscal year referred to in the assessment. Landscape Maintenance District No. 36 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 3 Fiscal Year 2011/12 P176 If the assessment to be levied exceeds the maximum assessment amount previously approved, the City must comply with the procedures specified in Article XIIID and Proposition 218. The voters in the State of California in November 1996 added Article XIIID to the California Constitution imposing, among other requirements, the necessity for the City to conduct an assessment ballot procedure to enable the owners of each property on which assessments are proposed to be enacted or increased, the opportunity to express their support for, or opposition to the proposed assessment or increase in such assessment. The basic steps of the assessment ballot procedure are outlined below. The City must prepare a Notice of Public Hearing ("Notice"), which describes, along with other mandated information, the reason for the proposed assessments, and to provide a date and time of a public hearing to be held on the matter. The City must also prepare an assessment ballot, which clearly gives the property owner the ability to sign and mark their assessment ballot either in favor of, or in opposition to the proposed assessment. The Notice and assessment ballot are mailed to each affected property owner within the District a minimum of 45 days prior to the public hearing date as shown in the Notice. The City may also hold community meetings with the property owners to discuss the issues facing the District and to answer property owner questions directly. After the Notice and assessment ballot are mailed, property owners are given until the close of the public hearing, stated in the Notice, to return their signed and marked assessment ballot. During the public hearing, property owners are given the opportunity to address the City Council and ask questions or voice their concerns. At the public hearing, the returned assessment ballots received prior to the close of the public hearing are tabulated, weighted by the proposed assessment amount on each property and the results are announced by the City Council. Article XIIID provides that if, as a result of the assessment ballot proceeding, a majority protest is found to exist, the City Council shall not have the authority to levy and collect the assessments as proposed. A majority protest exists if the assessments represented by ballots submitted in opposition exceed those submitted in favor of the assessment. All returned ballots are tabulated and weighted according to the financial obligation of each particular parcel. If there is no majority protest as described above, the City Council may approve the proposed assessments. If there is a majority protest, as described above, the City will not levy and collect any assessments. Landscape Maintenance District No. 36 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2011/12 P177 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS The District provides for the administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing of various improvements located within the public right-of-way and dedicated easements within the boundaries of the District. Description of the Boundaries of the District The District is located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California. The boundaries of the District are generally described as that area of the City South and East of Hyssop Drive south of 61h Street. Reference is also made to the Assessment Diagram included in this Report. Description of Improvements and Services The improvements are the maintenance and servicing of landscaping sites and appurtenant facilities throughout the District. The landscaping maintenance includes, but is not limited to, shrubs, turf, tree trimming, weed and pest control, landscape irrigation systems and testing, trash, debris and graffiti removal, and associated appurtenant facilities. Services include personnel, materials, contracting services, utilities, and all necessary costs associated with the maintenance, replacement and repair required to keep the improvements in a healthy, vigorous and satisfactory condition. In addition, it is the City's intention to continue to use cost effective materials, including the future ability to replace landscaping with drought resistant or low water use plants, in order to lower expenses of the District. The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows: Site # Descriptive Location J-2 The monument at the northeast corner of Haven and 4th Street. Ground Cover area: 5,715 square feet Turf area: 6,068 square feet J-3 The 6th street median from Milliken to Pittsburg. Ground Cover area: 3,300 square feet J-4 The entry monuments on the east and west side of 4th and Milliken. Ground Cover area: 19,771 square feet Turf area 9,060 square feet J-5 The Milliken median from Arrow to Jersey Ground Cover area: 10,220 square feet J-6 The Spruce median from Foothill to White Oak. Ground Cover area: 4,300 square feet J-7 The 6th Street median from Pittsburg to Richmond. Ground Cover area: 5,114 square feet J-8 The 6th Street median from Richmond to Buffalo. Ground Cover area: 2,476 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 38 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Prepared by NBS -Fiscal Year 2011/12 P178 J-9 The Milliken railroad underpass. Ground Cover area: 165,633 square feet 12-12-01 added 5199 sq feet Turf area: 4,897 square feet J-10 The 6th street median from Cleveland to 1,820 feet east of Cleveland. Ground Cover area: 13,310 square feet J-11 The 6th Street median from Buffalo to Rochester. Ground cover area: 12,400 square feet' J-12 The Milliken median from Arrow to Century. Ground Cover area: 13,855 square feet J-13 The Milliken median from Century to Foothill Blvd. Ground Cover area: 3,330 square feet J-14 The 6th Street median from Utica to Cleveland. Ground Cover area: 8,559 square feet J-15 The 6th Street median form Haven to Utica. Ground Cover area: 7,680 square feet. J-16 Day Creek median from Church to Foothill. Ground cover area: 8,466 square feet *Site was 2-9 and maintained by TruGreen. Now maintained by Mariposa. J-17 The Day Creek medians south of Foothill including the traffic circle. Ground cover area: 6,490 square feet *Site was 2-10 and maintained by TruGreen. Now maintained by Mariposa. H-1 The Haven median from 4th Street to 6th Street. Ground cover area: 12,270 square feet Turf area: 8,935 square feet H-2 The Haven medians from 6th Street to the underpass bridge. The east and west side parkways and slopes on Haven from Acacia Street to underpass bridge. Ground cover area: 51,760 square feet Turf area: 2,960 square feet `Site increased on 9-22-10 due to Haven Underpass Project. H-3 The Haven medians from underpass bridge to Arrow Route. The east and west side parkways and slopes on Haven from the underpass bridge to Jersey Blvd... Ground cover area: 53,181 square feet Turf area: 3,029 square feet *Site increased on 9-22-10 due to Haven Underpass Project. H-4 The Haven median from Arrow Route to Foothill. Ground cover area: 8,348 square feet Turf area: 6,808 square feet FH-1 The Foothill median from Spruce to Haven. Ground cover area: 4,571 square feet The total square footage for the improvement is 9,141; however, due to the location of the improvement the other half is maintained by LMD 4-R. FH-2 The Foothill median from Spruce to Milliken. Ground cover area: 7,940 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B -City of Rancho Cucamonga Prepared by NBS -Fiscal Year 2011/12 P179 The total square footage for the improvement is 15,879; however, due to the location of the improvement the other half is maintained by LMD 4-R. FH-3 The Foothill median from 790 feet west of Market Place to Market Place. Ground cover area: 4,434 square feet FH-4 The Foothill median from Market Place to Etiwanda. Ground cover area: 10,392 square feet FH-5 The Foothill median from 360 feet west of Masi Dr. to 516 feet west of Masi Dr. Ground cover area: 800 square feet The total square footage for the improvement is 1,600; however, due to the location of the improvement the other half is maintained by LMD 4-R. Map of Improvements The following page shows the map of landscaping improvements, including irrigation sites and community trails, to be maintained using District funds. Landscape Maintenance District No. 36 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Prepared by NBS -Fiscal Year 2011/12 Z~ d v, m N o J ~ ~ U ~ W ~ ~ d Z W ~ U W Z ~ Z ~ ~ O ~ O W ~j Q O m ~ C7 F (7 Y O W O ` ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ ~ _ ii r._; E o I ii ! i n i..~ m G LL I W ntl ePUemp} 0 Z V ~L N ~ . ~ ~ ~ I V ^ Y ^ , W d • ~ Q c G ntl uaneH (~ ntl esow~aH (~ ntl PIeV!VuN J ntl uewllaH IS ue!lawe~ C7 = Z U£ ~~¢//6 ._,~~ Wr } ntl ntl uaY!II!W N m N I cN G ~ ~ S L-I (h 1 ~ "'l fV ® ~/ uay!II!W I N r souuaH O leq!WN 0 • tl uewlleH 5 ~o ° • ~, ~ ~~ ¢ ; m y~ 0 LL 4 omo _ °- t'€~r~° a °~&sm°nd d~;,~E ~vmES~ aeErc~ `m 3~ oFc EKe nimmE~ ~Vm cU'oEp 'c3vEoo- =gOE''mEiEu~OYC 95WmQmbE o^~ m ~ E°m nUCmEcvU~$~5 v°E=_ P181 ESTIMATE OF COSTS The estimated costs of administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing the improvements as described in the Plans and- Specifications are summarized below. Each year, as part of the assessment district levy calculation process, the costs and expenses are reviewed and the annual costs are projected for the following fiscal year. District Estimated 2011/12 Bud et Personnel Services Regular Payroll $313,880.00 Overtime Salaries 2,630.00 Part-time Salaries 53,700.00 Fringe Benefits 153.140.00 Subtotal Personnel $523,350.00 Operations and Maintenance Operations and Maintenance $58,900.00 Operations and Maintenance/Facilities 8,500.00 Vehicle Operations and Maintenance 1,500.00 Emergency Equipment and Vehicle Rental 2,000.00 Equipment Operations and Maintenance 12,000.00 Contract Services 402,340.00 Contract Services/Facilities 128,500.00 .Tree Maintenance 21,850.00 Utilities Telephone Utilities 1,420.00 Water Utilities 70,750.00 Electric Utilities 35,950.00 Assessment Administration 6,170.00 General Overhead 68.990.00 Subtotal Operations and Maintenance $618,870.00 Capital Expenditures Capital Projects $30.000.00 Subtotal Capital Expenditures $30,000.00 Total Expenditure Budget $1,372,220.00 Total Estimated Assessment $980,970.00 Less Anticipated Delinquencies (43 650.001 Total Estimated Revenue $937,320.00 Plus Operating Reserve Fund Contribution 434 900.00 Total Expenditure Budget $1,372,220.00 Total Estimated Assessment $980,970.00 Total District EBU Count ~ 2780.52 Actual Assessment per EBU -Fiscal Year 2011/12 ~ $352.80 Maximum Allow ble Ass ment er EBU -Fiscal Year 2011/12 352 80 Landscape Maintenance District No. 36 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Prepared by NBS -Fiscal Year 2011/12 P182 The maximum allowable assessment per EBU listed in the District budget above, is the amount which was approved in 1996/97 and subsequent District annexations. Each year, prior to the assessments being placed on the tax roll, the City will review the budget and determine the amount needed to maintain the improvements for the upcoming fiscal year. The actual assessment per EBU will be based on the estimated costs of maintenance, available fund balance and maximum allowable assessment with the goal of maintaining the improvements in a satisfactory and healthy condition. The actual assessment amount may be lower than the maximum allowable assessment; however it may not exceed the maximum unless the increase is approved by the property owners in accordance with Proposition 218. It is the intent of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to maintain an Operating Reserve which shall not exceed the estimated costs of maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or when the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The reserve balance information for the District is as follows: Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2011 Reserve Fund Balance $1,110,19D.00 Operating Reserve Contribution -Fiscal Year 2011/12 (434,900.00) Operatinc Reserve Collection -Fiscal Year 2011/12 0.00 Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2012 Reserve Fund Balance $675,290.00 Definitions of Budget Items The following definitions describe the costs and expenses included in the District Budget: Personnel Services Regular Salaries: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all full-time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Part Time Salaries: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all part time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Fringe Benefits: This item includes the benefits available to City employees: health care, vacation, sick time, and retirement fund. Operations and Maintenance Contract Services: This item includes the contract costs of a landscape maintenance company responsible for the ongoing maintenance of the District improvements. Tree Maintenance: This item includes the contract costs attributed to maintaining the street trees and other trees throughout the District. Utilities -Water: This item includes the costs to furnish water for the landscaping within the District. Utilities -Electric: This item includes the costs to furnish electricity required for the operation and maintenance of the sprinklers and irrigation controllers. Assessment Administration: This item includes the cost to all particular departments and staff of the City, and consultants for providing the administration, coordination and management of District services, operations, and incidental expenses related to the District. This item also includes creation of an annual engineer's report, resolutions and placing the assessment amounts onto the County tax Landscape Maintenance District No. 38 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Prepared by NBS -Fiscal Year 2011/12 P183 roll each year, along with responding to any public inquiries and future Proposition 218 balloting proceedings. General Overhead: This item includes the costs of all departments and staff of the City for providing the coordination of District services, inspections, annual bid management, responding to public concerns, public education, accounting, auditing and procedural matters associated with the District. This item also includes an allocation for general City staff time for administrative functions and systems that provide for a functional and operational assessment district within the City's administrative structure. Capital Expenditures: Capital Projects: This item includes new improvements to further enhance the level and quality of service provided within the boundaries of the District. This may include new monuments, irrigation systems, and other large improvements. Operating Reserve Collection: Operating Reserve Collection: This item includes the amount to be collected to maintain reserves to enable the City to pay for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or whenever the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The Reserve Fund contribution will continue until such a time the Reserve Fund balance is approximately one half of the annual costs. The fund may be allowed to accumulate in anticipation of any unforeseen expenses not included in the yearly maintenance costs. This may include, but is not limited to, tree replacements, repair of damaged equipment due to vandalism, storms and other similar events. Landscape Maintenance District No. 38 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 10 Prepared by NBS -Fiscal Year 2011/12 P184 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT General Pursuant to the 1972 Act and Article XIIID, all parcels that have a special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements and services shall be identified, and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel shall be determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of improvements. The 1972 Act, permits the establishment of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include the operation, maintenance and servicing of landscaping improvements. Section 22573 of the 1972 Act requires that maintenance assessments must be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. This Section states: "The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district maybe apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefit to 6e received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements." The determination of whether or not a lot or parcel will benefit from the improvements shall be made pursuant to the Improvement Act of 1911 (Division 7 (commencing with Section 5000) (of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California]. " The 1972 Act also permits the designation of zones of benefit within any individual assessment district if "by reasons or variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive different degrees of benefit from the improvement" (Sec. 22547). Article XIIID, Section 4(a) of the California Constitution limits the amount of any assessment to the proportional special benefit conferred on the property. Article XIIID also provides that publicly owned properties must be assessed unless there is clear and convincing evidence that those properties receive no special benefit from the assessment. Exempted from the assessment would be the areas of public streets, public avenues, public lanes, public roads, public drives, public courts, public alleys, public easements and rights-of-ways, public greenbelts and public parkways. The net amount to be assessed may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels. Proposition 218, approved by the voters in November 1996, requires the City to separate general benefit from special benefit, where only special benefit is assessed. Benefit The maintenance and servicing of the improvements within the District (which are described in the Description of Services and Improvements Section of this report) are for the benefit of the properties within the District, and as such confer a special and direct benefit to parcels within the District by: • improving the livability, appearance, and desirability for properties within the boundaries of the District, and • ensuring that improvements do not reach a state of deterioration or disrepair so as to be materially detrimental to properties within the District, and Landscape Maintenance District No. 36 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 11 Fiscal Year 2011/12 P186 • providing beautification, shade and overall enhancement to properties within the District. The above mentioned items affect the assessed property in a way that is particular and distinct from their effect on other parcels and that real property in general and the public at large do not share. They contribute to a specific enhancement of the properties within the District. Since these improvements, including the community trails, were installed and are maintained specifically for the properties within the District; only properties within the District receive a special benefit and are assessed for said maintenance. General Benefit In addition to the special benefits received by parcels within the District, there are derivative general benefits that are conferred on parcels outside the boundaries of the District which include: • the control of dust and insect infestations, and • the visual enhancement of the area to persons or vehicles that may travel through the District. However it has been determined that these benefits are derivative and do not provide a direct benefit td parcels outside of the district that are not being assessed. Method of Assessment Each of the parcels within the District is deemed to receive special benefit from the improvements. Each parcel that has a special benefit conferred upon it as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements are identified and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel is determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of the improvements. When the District was formed in 1984, Article XIIID and Proposition 218 had not yet been passed. Upon_ the passage of Article XIIID and the subsequent passage of the Proposition Omnibus Implementation Act, new rules were put into place. Due to the changes in legal requirements, as property annexed to the District after the passage of the Assessment Law, the description of the method of assessment became more refined, however, the assessment per parcel has remained the same since the 1996!97 Fiscal Year. Further, no parcel included in the District formation or annexations prior to when the language was refined, are now being levied differently than they were at the time the District was formed or the parcels were annexed. To assess special benefit appropriately, it is necessary to relate the different type of parcel improvements to each other. The Equivalent Benefit Unit ("EBU") method of apportionment uses the single family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single family home equals one Equivalent Benefit Unit (EBU). Every other land-use is converted to EBUs based on an assessment formula that equates to the property's specific development status, type of development (land-use), and size of the property, as compared to a single family home. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land-use types, as assigned by County use code, to determine each parcel's EBU assignment. Land-Use Equivalent Dwelling Units Pro ert T e Count Use Code EBU Value Multi lier Non-Residential 1.00 Acre Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B -City of Rancho Cucamonga 12 Fiscal Year 2011/12 P186 The use of the latest County Assessor's Secured Roll shall be the basis for the Property Type determination and units/acreage assignments, unless better data is available to the City. In addition, if any parcel within the District is identified by the County Auditor/Controller to be an invalid parcel .number for the current fiscal year, the Property Type and EBU assignment shall be based on the correct parcel number and/or new parcel number(s) County use code and subsequent property information. If a single parcel has changed to multiple parcels, the EBU assignment and assessment amount applied to each of the new parcels will be recalculated rather than spread the proportionate share of the original assessment. The following table summarizes the Fiscal Year 2011/12 maximum allowable assessment rates for the District: Property Type Maximum Allowable Actual (County Use Code) Assessment Rate Assessment Rate Total Total er EBU er EBU UnitslAcres EBUs Non-Residential $352.80 $352.80 2,780.52 2,780.52 The total amount of maintenance and incidental costs for maintaining the landscaping and community trail improvements is assessed to the individual parcels of real property within the District in proportion to the special benefit received by such parcels of real property. The proposed individual assessments are shown on the assessment roll in this report. Landscape Maintenance District No. 38 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 13 Fiscal Year 2011/12 P187 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM An Assessment Diagram for the District is shown on the following page. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the County Assessor of the County San Bernardino, at the time this report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Engineer's Report. Landscape Maintenance District No. 38 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 14 Fiscal Year 2011/12 P188 m w m M ~~ y.+ w ~ •~ ~ m ,'" Q . ~ ° h '~ ti r V i .._.._.._.._ 1 ~ ~ ~ - . J N ~ c J _ [O G ~ d ~ O A, W ~ ~ p] O O O ~ ` ~ v_ a ~ ^d lse3 in i ® ~ i ny epuenn!13 _ ny epuenn93 _~~ ~ ' ( i ----- - -- -- - y ~8 ~aaJ~ ~(ed ` ~ a ~_.._.._.._.._.._.._.., C nyJalsayooa !- ~ -- ---------, i ~ ny Jalsayooa ~ J ,...: /,~ ) ~ _ ny ua~!II!W ~._.._.._.._.._.._-- -(- ~ - ~ I ny ua~!II!W ~1 \ ~ ,v ny uaneH ~ ny uaneH ny esowJaH (~ ny esowJaH ^d Pleq!yoJy ^d PIeQ!4oJt/ ny uewpaH ~ ny uewllaH cn L L ~ ny pJeJ(au !/~ ~g ue!lawe~ E gEi€riEEgE~i P = `~88 v ¢f: a~ a ~~ ~ ~ tq m ~ Ab'anOJ~ UJ ! 5 ~ •y g~~ ? m~ ~ ~ N .L. O W E~~:; g x~ ~- ~~ ~ v N N p Q l4 Q ~ 9 aFfziRQ g_8 ~ c m LL g ~$}~g'Z ~ _a ' ~ ~ >' t g g S6j ~~s~Y~~ ~ ~ y N m (i ~~ [a€~ 66 p~P{gg{ yy ~~ = Bg~€ 3Af~ete ~a~fi~eBB 8 ~ ~ z~ ~ %= U S A a:m ~" 8eta~sE~ %~ie ~ P189 ASSESSMENT ROLL Assessment Roll The assessment roll is a listing of the assessment for Fiscal Year 2011/12 apportioned to each lot or parcel, as shown on the last equalized roll of the Assessor of the County of San Bernardino. The following tables summarize the Fiscal Year 2011/12 maximum and actual assessments for the District: Maximum Allowable Maximum Property Type Assessment Rate Total Total Allowable Coun Use Code er EBU Units/Acres EBUs Assessment Non-Residential $352.80 2,780.52 2,780.52 $980,970.00 Actual Property Type (Coun Use Code Assessment Rate er EBU Total Units/Acres Total EBUs Actual Assessment Non-Residential $352.80 2,780.52 2,780.52 $980,970.00 A copy of the full assessment roll is available for review in the City Clerk's office. Annexations The following annexations are effective for the 2011/12 Fiscal Year: Assessor's Parcel Number Annexation Date Pro'ect Total UnitslAcres Total EBUs Property Type Coun Use Code 0229-141-15 05/19/2010 DRC2006-00580 1.76 Acres 1.76 Commercial 1061-621-29 12/01/2010 ~ DRC2009-00586 1.06 Acres 1.06 Commercial 0209-491-04 12/15/2010 DRC2007-00247 2.00 Acres 2.00 Commercial 0209-491-05 12/15/2010 DRC2007-00247 1.70 acres 1.70 Commercial Landscape Maintenance District No. 36 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 15 Fiscal Year 2011/12 P190 Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2011/2012 City of Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 4-R (Caryn Planned Community) P191 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 6 (CARYN PLANNED COMMUNITY) 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Phone: 909.477.2700 Fax: 909.477.2741 CITY COUNCIL L. Dennis Michael, Mayor Sam Spagnolo, Mayor Pro Tem William Alexander, Council Member Chuck Buquet, Council Member Diane Williams, Council Member CITY STAFF John R. Gillison, Assistant City Manager Linda D. Daniels, Deputy City Manager William Wittkopf, Public Works Director Ingrid Y. Bruce, GISISpecial Districts Manager Christopher Bopko, Management Analyst III P192 TABLE OF CONTENTS ENGINEER'S LETTER INTRODUCTION 1 3 Reason for Assessment .............................................................................................3 Process for Annual Assessment .................................................................................3 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS 5 Description of the Boundaries of the District ...............................................................5 Description of Improvements and Services ................................................................5 Map of Improvements ...............................................................................................11 ESTIMATE OF COSTS 12 District Budget ..........................................................................................................12 Definitions of Budget Items .......................................................................................13 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT 15 General .....................................................................................................................15 Special Benefit .........................................................................................................15 General Benefit ........................................................................................................16 Method of Assessment Spread ................:...............................................................16 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM 18 ASSESSMENT ROLL 19 Assessment Roll .......................................................................................................19 Annexations ..............................................................................................................19 P193 ENGINEER'S LETTER WHEREAS, on July 6, 2011, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga (the "City"), under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 (the "1972 Act") adopted its Resolution No.11-098 a Resolution Initiating Proceedings for the Levy of Annual Assessments for Landscape Maintenance District No. 6 (Caryn Planned Community) (the "District"); and WHEREAS, the Resolution Initiating Proceedings directed staff to prepare and file an Engineer's Report for Fiscal Year 2011/12 pursuant to the requirements of the 1972 Act. The Engineer's Report presents the plans and specifications describing the general nature, location and extent of the improvements to be maintained, an estimate of the costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements for the District for the referenced fiscal year, a diagram for the District, showing the area and properties proposed to be assessed, and an assessment of the estimated costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing the improvements, assessing the net amount upon all assessable lots and/or parcels within the District in proportion to the special benefit received; and NOW THEREFORE, the following assessment is proposed to be authorized in order to pay the estimated costs of maintenance, operation and servicing of the improvements to be paid by the assessable real property within the boundaries of the District in proportion to the special benefit received. The following table summarizes the proposed assessment. SUMMARY OF ASSESSMENT Fiscal Year 2011/12 Total Estimated Assessment $2,498,140.00 Less Anticipated Delinquencies 119 270.00 Total Estimated Revenue $2,378,870..00 Plus Reserve Fund Contribution 40,130.00 Total Expenditure Budget $2,419,000.00 Total District EBU Count 6,574.05 Actual Assessment per EBU $360.00 Maximum Allowable Assessment per EBU $380.00 In making the assessments contained herein pursuant to the 1972 Act: I have identified all parcels which will have a special benefit conferred upon them from the improvements described in the Special Benefit Section of this Engineer's Report (the "Specially Benefited Parcels"). For particulars as to the identification of said parcels, reference is made to the Assessment Diagram, a copy of which is included in this Engineer's Report. 2. I have evaluated the costs and expenses of the improvements upon the Specially Benefited Parcels. In making such evaluation: Landscape Maintenance District No. 4-R -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2011!12 P194 a. The proportionate special benefit derived by each Specially Benefited Parcel from the improvements was determined in relationship to the entirety of the maintenance costs of the improvements; b. No assessment has been imposed on any Specially Benefited Parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on such parcel from the improvements; and c: Any general benefits from the improvements have been separated from the special benefits and only special benefits have been assessed. I, the undersigned, respectfully submit the enclosed Engineer's Report and, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, the Engineer's Report, Assessments, and the Assessment Diagram herein have been prepared and computed in accordance with the order of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Assessment Law. Mark A. Steuer, Director of Engineer Services/City Engineer Landscape Maintenance District No. 4-R -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2011/12 P195 INTRODUCTION Reason for Assessment Approval of the assessment covered by this Engineer's Report will generate the revenue necessary to: Provide for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements described in this Engineer's Report. Maintenance may include but is not limited to, all of the following: the repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement, providing for the life, growth, health and beauty of the landscaping, including cultivation, irrigation, trimming, spraying, fertilizing or treating for disease or injury, the removal of trimming, rubbish, debris and other solid waste, the maintenance, repair and replacement as necessary of all irrigation systems and the removal of graffiti from walls immediately adjacent to the cultivated areas. Servicing means the furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operating and servicing of any improvement. Servicing shall also include vehicle, equipment, capital improvements and administrative costs associated with the annual administration and operation of the District. Process for Annual Assessment The City cannot levy and collect annual assessments within the District without complying with the procedures specified in the 1972 Act. On an annual basis, an Engineer's Report must be prepared which contains a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the district. The City Council must also adopt a resolution of intention which: • Declares the intention of the City Council to levy and collect assessments within the assessment district for the fiscal year stated therein. • Generally describes the existing and proposed improvements and any substantial changes proposed to be made in existing improvements. Refers to the assessment district by its distinctive designation and indicate the general location of the district. • Refers to the report of the engineer, on file with the clerk, for a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the district. • Gives notice of the time and place for public hearing by the City Council on the levy of the proposed assessment. • States whether the assessment is proposed to increase from the previous year. If the assessments are to be levied in the same or lesser amounts than the maximum assessment amount approved, the clerk shall give notice by causing the resolution of intention to be published. Any interested person may, prior to the conclusion of the public hearing, file a written protest which shall state all grounds of objection. The protest shall contain a description sufficient to identify the property owned by the property owner f ling the protest. During the course or upon conclusion of the hearing, the City Council may order changes in any of the matters provided in the report, including changes in the improvements, any zones within the assessment district, and the proposed diagram or the proposed assessment. The City Council, upon conclusion of the public hearing must then adopt a resolution confirming the diagram and assessment, either as originally proposed or as changed by it. The adoption of the resolution shall constitute the levy of an assessment for the fiscal year referred to in the assessment. Landscape Maintenance District No. 4-R -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2011 /12 P196 If the assessment to be levied exceeds the maximum assessment amount previously approved, the City must comply with the procedures specified in Article XIII D and Proposition 218. The voters in the State of California in November 1996 added Article XIII D to the California Constitution imposing, among other requirements, the necessity for the City to conduct an assessment ballot procedure to enable the owners of each property on which assessments are proposed to be enacted or increased, ttie opportunity to express their support for, or opposition to the proposed assessment or increase in such assessment. The basic steps of the assessment ballot procedure are outlined below. The City must prepare a Notice of Public Hearing ("Notice'), which describes, along with other mandated information, the reason for the proposed assessments, and to provide a date and time of a public hearing to be held on the matter. The City must also prepare an assessment ballot, which clearly gives the property owner the ability to sign and mark their assessment ballot either in favor of, or in opposition to the proposed assessment. The Notice and assessment ballot are mailed to each affected property owner within the District a minimum of 45 days prior to the public hearing date as shown in the Notice. The City may also hold community meetings with the property owners to discuss the issues facing the District and to answer property owner questions directly. After the Notice and assessment ballot are mailed, property owners are given until the close of the public hearing, stated in the Notice, to return their signed and marked assessment ballot. During the public hearing, property owners are given the opportunity to address the City Council and ask questions or voice their concerns. At the public hearing, the returned assessment ballots received prior to the close of the public hearing are tabulated, weighted by the proposed assessment amount on each property and the results are announced by the City Council. Article XIII D provides that if, as a result of the assessment ballot proceeding, a majority protest is found to exist, the City Council shall not have the authority to levy and collect the assessments as proposed. A majority protest exists if the assessments represented by ballots submitted in opposition exceed those submitted in favor of the assessment. All returned ballots are tabulated and weighted according to the financial obligation of each particular parcel. If there is no majority protest as described above, the City Council may approve the proposed assessments. If there is a majority protest, as described above, the City will not levy and collect any assessments. Landscape Maintenance District No. 4-R -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2011/12 P197 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS The District provides for the administration, maintenance, operations, and Servicing of various improvements located within the public right-of-way and dedicated easements within the boundaries of the District. Description of the Boundaries of the District The District is located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California. The boundaries of the District are generally described as that area located north of Foothill Boulevard, west of Rochester Avenue, east of Haven Avenue, south of Base Line Road and includes the northeast corner of Base Line Road and Haven Avenue. Reference is also made to the Assessment Diagram included in this Report. Description of Improvements and Services The improvements are the maintenance and servicing of the paseos, parkways, median islands, street trees, parks, landscaped sites and appurtenant facilities that are throughout the Terra Vista Planned Community. These improvements are located within the street right-of-ways, dedicated public easements and parks which are within the boundaries of the District. The landscaping maintenance includes, but is not limited to, the pruning, fertilizing, mowing, weeding, pest control, removal of trash/debris, and irrigation of the trees, shrubs, vines, ground cover, and turf. Maintenance of associated improvements, including the parks and irrigation systems, includes but is not limited to, grading and replacement of trail surfacing, trail fence repair and replacement, and irrigation systems control, adjustment, repair and replacement. Services include personnel,. materials, contracting services, utilities, and all necessary costs associated with the maintenance, replacement and repair required to keep the improvements in a healthy, vigorous and satisfactory condition. The 38 acres of parks consist of Spruce Park, Mountain View Park, Ralph M. Lewis Park, Coyote Canyon Park, Milliken Park and West Greenway Park. In addition, it is the City's intention to continue to use cost effective materials, including the future ability to replace landscaping with drought resistant or low water use plants, in order to lower expenses of the District. The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows: The street trees within the residential parkways and tree maintenance easements to be maintained by the District are on the following streets, located within the boundaries of the District: Amiata Dr Bastia Ct Blackhorse Ct Brandywine PI Bunkerhill Dr Cedarbrook PI Chesterton Dr Claridge PI Clarisa PI Corsica Ct (Countryview to Milliken) Countryview (Mt. View to Palacio) Covington PI Danbury Dr DannerCt De Anza Dr Derby PI Downing Ct Ellena Wy (s/o Terra Vista to Fitrpatrick) Emery PI Fitrpatrick Dr Fulbourn Ct Hinton Ct Linaro Rd Meyers Dr Potomac Ct Radcliff PI Regent Dr Rockingham Ct Sarzanza PI Southhampton Ct Terra Vista Pky (Church to Brandywine) Wellington PI Yorktown Ct Landscape Maintenance District No. 4-R -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2011/12 P198 The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows: Site # Descriptive Location TV-1 The Base Line median from Haven to the Deer Creek Channel. Ground Cover area: 16,613 square feet Turf area: 19,030 square feet Hardscape area: 23,650 square feet Due to the location of the improvements, an additional 2,769 square feet of ground cover area and 1,478 square feet of turt area of the median are maintained by the City, however that portion is not funded by the District and instead funded by the City's General Fund. TV-2 The Base Line median from Spruce to the Deer Creek Channel. Ground Cover area: 13,504 square feet Turt area: 16,109 square feet Hardscape area: 12,575 square feet Due to the location of the improvements, an additional 2,749 square feet of ground cover area and 1,598 square feet of turf area of the median are maintained by the City, however that portion is not funded by the District and instead funded by the City's General Fund. TV-3 The Base Line median from Spruce to Milliken. Ground Cover area: 8,418 square feet Turf area: 13,573 square feet Hardscape area: 16,567 square feet Due to the location of the improvements, an additional 5,247 square feet of ground cover area and 4,289 square feet of turf area of the median are maintained by the City, however that portion is not funded by the District and instead funded by the City's General Fund. Nit The south side of Base Line from 800 feet east of Spruce to Milliken. The cul-de-sac at the north end of Cascade. Ground Cover area: 9,278 square feet Turf area: 12,659 square feet Hardscape area: 7,950 square feet TV-5 The north side of Terra Vista Parkway from Belpine to 112 feet west of Butterfield; Terra Vista Parkway median from Spruce to Milliken and the south side of Terra Vista Parkway from 164 feet west of Belpine to Belpine. Ground Cover area: 13,411 square feet Turf area: 6,555 square feet Hardscape area: 12,978 square feet N-6 The north side of Terra Vista Parkway from Spruce to 175 feet north of Countryside and Terra Vista Parkway median from Church to Spruce. Ground Cover area: 17,991 square feet Turf area: 11,413 square feet Hardscape area: 11,452 square feet TV-7 The north side of Church from the Deer Creek Channel to Terra Vista Parkway. The west side of Terra Vista Parkway from Church to 175 feet north of Countryside. Ground Cover area: 9,924 square feet Turt area: 5,378 square feet Hardscape area: 6,426 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 4-R -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2011/12 P199 TV-8 The southeast corner of Church and Haven; the Church median from Haven to Terra Vista Parkway and the wash end on the Northwest corner of the Deer Creek Channel and Church. Ground Cover area: 26,876 square feet Turf area: 2,306 square feet Hardscape area: 2,788 square feet TV-9 The Church median from Terra Vista Parkway to Elm. Ground Cover area: 7,829 square feet Hardscape area: 6,605 square feet TV-10 The east side of Valencia from Base Line to the pre-school; the south side of Augusta from Valencia to Meadow Lark and the west side of Summerfield from Valencia to Evergreen. Ground Cover area: 20,818 square feet Turf area: 18,634 square feet Hardscape area: 8,666 square feet TV-11 The paseo at Parkside and Clover from Parkside to the Deer Creek Channel. Ground Cover area: 2,795 square feet Hardscape area: 1,049 square feet TV-12 The east side of Haven from the pre-school to the Southern Pacific Railroad. Ground Cover area: 6,170 square feet Turt area: 2,091 square feet Hardscape area: 1,060 square feet TV-13 The east side of Spruce from Elm to Mountain View; the north and south sides of Norfolk from Spruce to Cardiff; the south side of Mountain View from Spruce to 290 feet east of Belvedere and the paseo from Spruce to Countryview. Ground Cover area: 8,459 square feet Turf area: 3,355 square feet Hardscape area: 8,886 square feet TV-14 The south side of Mountain View from 290 feet east of Belvedere to 590 feet east of Fairhaven; the paseo south of Mountain View between Belvedere and Fairhaven to Country View and from Countryview Drive to West Greenway Corridor. Ground Cover area: 19,030 square feet Turf area: 8,430 square feet Hardscape area: 9,262 square feet TV-15 The north side of Mountain View from 634 feet west of Biarritz to Milliken. Ground Cover area: 4,571 square feet Turf area: 4,738 square feet Hardscape area: 5,104 square feet TV-16 The west Greenway Corridor from the northeast corner of Elm and Spruce to West Greenway. Ground Cover area: 15,529 square feet Turt area: 20,884 square feet Hardscape area: 20,626 square feet TV-17 The west side of Milliken from 585 feet north of Mountain View to Mountain View. Ground Cover area: 5,835 square feet Turf area: 3,564 square feet Hardscape area: 2,340 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 4-R -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2011/12 P200 N-18 The south side of Mountain View from approximately 250 feet west of Claridge to Terra Vista Parkway. The south side of Terra Vista Parkway from Mountain View to East Greenway Corridor. Terra Vista Parkway from Mountain View to East Greenway Corridor. Ground Cover area: 18,316 square feet Turf area: 5,944 square feet Hardscape area: 23,800 square feet TV-19 The Terra Vista Parkway median from Milliken to Mountain View. The north side of Terra Vista Parkway from 68 feet north of Addison to Mountain View. The west side of Mountain View from Grapevine to Terra Vista Parkway. Ground Cover area: 20,306 square feet Turt area: 3,886 square feet Hardscape area: 11,478 square feet N-20 The Church median from Milliken to 675 feet east of Milliken. Ground Cover area: 2,860 square feet Hardscape area: 2,112 square feet TV-21 The Church median from Milliken to Spruce. Ground Cover area: 16,811 square feet Turt area: 335 square feet Hardscape area: 14,880 square feet N-22 The Milliken median from Mountain View to Foothill. Ground Cover area: 16,436 square feet Hardscape area: 16,267 square feet TV-23 The Milliken underpass from West Greenway Park to Milliken Park. Ground Cover area: 19,271 square feet Turf area: 22,139 square feet Hardscape area: 18,119 square feet N-24 The east side of Haven from 145 feet south of Creekbridge to 600 feet north of Creekbridge; the north side of Creekbridge from Brookside to Haven and the paseo from Creekbridge and Brookside to the Deer Creek Channel. Ground Cover area: 5,851 square feet Turt area: 9,965 square feet Hardscape area: 4,351 square feet TV-25 The east side of Haven from 145 feet south of Creekbridge to 410 feet south of Creekbridge. Ground Cover area: 3,319 square feet Turf area: 1,677 square feet Hardscape area: 1,779 square feet N-26 The paseo at Plymouth south of Essex from Plymouth to the Deer Creek Channel. Ground Cover area: 1,956 square feet Hardscape area: 2,385 square feet N-27 The paseo from Terra Vista Parkway to Windsong and from Windsong to Plymouth. Ground Cover area: 2,270 square feet Turf area: 2,731 square feet Hardscape area: 3,332 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 4-R -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2011/12 P201 N-28 The paseo at 7552 Hardy. Ground Cover area: 630 square feet Turf area: 733 square feet Hardscape area: 432 square feet N-29 The East Greenway Corridor from Milliken Park to Terra Vista Parkway, including the turf area at the entrance to Tract 16157. Ground Cover area: 17,780 square feet Turf area: 52,403 square feet Hardscape area: 29,888 square feet N-30 The Milliken Median from Mountain View to Base Line. Ground Cover area: 11,890 square feet Hardscape area: 10,260 square feet N-31 The paseo from Elm to West Greenway Park. Ground Cover area: 4,770 square feet Hardscape area: 8,900 square feet N-32 The Greenwich paseo from Greenwich to Muirfield. Ground Cover area: 1,323 square feet Hardscape area: 1,456 square feet N-33 The south side of Mountain View from 430 feet west of Country View to Country View. Ground Cover area: 3,434 square feet Turt area: 1,853 square feet Hardscape area: 1,720 square feet , N-34 The south side of Terra Vista Parkway from 390 feet west of Belpine to Belpine. Ground Cover area: 1,342 square feet Turf area: 1,887 square feet Hardscape area: 1,612 square feet N-35 The Trail Northeast of Ruth Musser School from Terra Vista Parkway to Spruce. Ground Cover area: 9,285 square feet Hardscape area: 5,148 square feet N-36 The north side Meyers from Emery Place to Elm. Ground Cover area: 9,141 square feet Turt area: 5,895 square feet Hardscape area: 6,058 square feet N-37 The north side of Meyers from Emery Place to Elm. Ground Cover area: 5,860 square feet Turf area: 5,300 square feet Hardscape area: 1,283 square feet N-38 The Church median from Rochester to Terra Vista Parkway median from Church to 853 north of Church. Ground Cover area: 8,510 square feet Hardscape area: 5,640 square feet N-39 The north side of Mountain View from 250 feet east of Milliken to Milliken. The eastside of Milliken from Mountain View to Terra Vista Parkway. Ground Cover area: 16,751 square feet Hardscape area: 15,716 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 4-R -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2011/12 P202 N-40 The south side of Terra Vista Parkway from Milliken to Mountain View. Ground Cover area: 11,630 square feet Hardscape area: 19,738 square feet N-41 The south side of Terra Vista Parkway from Milliken to Mountain View. Ground Cover area: 4,081 square feet Hardscape area: 9,640 square feet N-42 The north side of Mountain View from Terra Vista Parkway to 250 feet east of Milliken. Ground Cover area: 10,994 square feet Hardscape area: 14,777 square feet N-43 Church median and parkway from Malaga to Terra Vista Parkway. Ground Cover area: 7,506 square feet Hardscape area: 3,955 square feet N-44 The south side of Church from Terra Vista Parkway to Rochester. Ground Cover area: 10,400 square feet Hardscape area: 7,606 square feet N-45 The west side of Rochester from Church to Malaga. Ground Cover area: 20,693 square feet Hardscape area: 12,450 square feet N-46 The north side of Malaga from Church to Rochester. Ground Cover area: 19,843 square feet Hardscape area: 18,000 square feet , N-47 The eastside of Terra Vista Parkway from Church to Brandywine. The paseo from Brandywine to Bunker Hill Drive. The eastside of Radcliff from Bunker to Malada. Ground Cover area: 17,838 square feet Hardscape area: 9,023 square feet N-48 The Church median from 750 feet east of Milliken to Malaga Ave. Ground Cover area: 5,554 square feet Hardscape area: 9,698 square feet FH-1 The Foothill median from Spruce to Haven. Ground Cover area: 4,571 square feet The total square footage for the improvement is 9,141; however, due to the location of the improvement the other half is maintained by LMD 36. FH-2 The Foothill median from Spruce to Milliken. Ground Cover area: 7,940 square feet The total square footage for the improvement is 15,879; however, due to the location of the improvement the other half is maintained by LMD 3B. FH-5 The Foothill median from 360 feet west of Masi Dr. to 516 feet west of Masi Dr. Ground Cover area: 800 square feet The total square footage for the improvement is 1,600; however, due to the location of the improvement the other half is maintained by LMD 3B. H-5 The Haven median from Foothill to Church. Ground Cover area: 6,216 square feet Turf area: 5,286 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 4-R -City of Rancho Cucamonga 10 Fiscal Year 2011 /12 P203 The total square footage for the Ground Cover improvement is 12,432 and the Turf improvement square footage is 10,572; however, due to the location of the improvements the other half is maintained by LMD 3B. H-6 Haven median from Church to Baseline. Ground Cover area: 5,306 square feet Turt area: 4,354 square feet The total square footage for the Ground Cover improvement is 10,612 and the Turf improvement square footage is 8,708; however, due to the location of the improvements the other half is maintained by LMD 3B H-7 The Haven median from Baseline to Southern Pacific railroad tracks. Ground Cover area: 2,980 square feet Turt area: 1,996 square feet The total square footage for the Ground Cover improvement is 5,960 and the Turf improvement square footage is 3,992; however, due to the location of the improvements the other half is maintained by LMD 3B. VG-14 The Baseline median from Milliken to Ellena East. The turf and ground cover on the north side of Baseline from Ellena East to Ellena West. The turf and ground cover on the east side of Ellena West from Baseline and following the curb line to Kenyon. The north side of Ellena West from Kenyon to Casoli. The turf and ground cover on both sides of Casoli from Ellena West to Candela. The turf and ground cover on both sides of Crema Place from Ellena west to Candela. Ground Cover area: 9,169 square feet The total square footage for the Ground Cover improvements are 80,287, 62,999 square feet for Turt and 44,826 square feet for Hardscape; however, due to the location of the improvements, LMD 4-R maintains only the south side of the Base Line median from Milliken to Ellena East and the rest is maintained by LMD 2. VG-15 The turf and ground cover on the west side of Rochester from the Southern Pacific Railroad to Baseline. The turf and ground cover on the north side of Baseline from Rochester to Ellena East. The Baseline Median from Rochester to Ellena East. The turf and ground cover on the east side of Ellena east from Baseline and continuing along that curb line to 275 feet north of Berra Road. The turt and ground cover on both sides of Berra from Ellena East to Comiso. Ground Cover area: 3,960 square feet The total square footage for the Ground Cover improvements are 58,5887, 57,306 square feet for Turf and 36,014 square feet for Hardscape; however, due to the location of the improvements, LMD 4-R maintains only the south side of the Base Line median from Rochester to Ellena East and the rest is maintained by LMD 2. Map of Improvements The following page shows the map of landscaping improvements, including irrigation sites and community trails, to be maintained using District funds. Landscape Maintenance District No. 4-R -City of Rancho Cucamonga 11 Fiscal Year 2011/12 I ( I I1~ il:;,' ~' ° I i'~~Ili II' I I ~ , Il..rl ~I ~ I II'I~I~II!Ir;;l I . I IIII i IIrllll,l I ~ :II li!li' IIIi'I'LII't111 ~'~ ~ r ~ I I I I I -I ~ 1- ~ ~ ~ I ' ~~ l~ III I : ~. I ~: ~ I Iii L~I~II .~ Ilj I I IIII.II;II:;i'I!II'I ` I: `„ I IIl ~; i.~ll! (t.l_I I ~i ! I ~ ~ I ~ ~ .I ~; j ~ ~ I I il'.il L,;jI ~Z i vI 11' ~ iP204 I. f I ~ a = ~ I ~ v . ~7T-I T.-1 ' I ~ *1 , /nV a31s3H~oa III '~ I I : ~ I ~ r I . ~ o o y a j f r r d ~L, I ~+ I'~ ~ I j~~~I i i~~11 II ~1~ 'I`-~ \ ~ I ~ I W g Q U' `i U' Y d O W C) ~ i \tl I I L 1 )y lll; I \ ` , ~ ir. 3 ~ a ~ n ~ ~ LL a y . J J ~ >A I III~I~J ~JI SI / l I ~I IIII Ilj~~l I, "~ "1 ~~ - a~ ~ ~ ' I µ I ~ 0 lF t;'~ }/C l ~ ~ 1~ III' lm ~ ~ /\ 1 III i lT 1 1. ~ I TT I 4 ~ ~~ l ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ la ~ > I 1 ~ 1, i~.l{ ( f:l ~ I F~ ^ l~ ]! ~~ ( I' I _ 1~.1 ~. I 1 1I1 I WY Ilj 11 ,I r~ '( I ~ ~ J 1 > I ~~I ~ ( QR' y ' I Zd J ~ I I ~ I I wa I, I 1 i , ~~J .. I r. I i ~ 111111 _ ` 11 , 1 II ~~ \ I `'' ~ ~ III I:i~l i~ T ~ ~ I ' I ~ I I I1 1 1 f i l ( ~ ~ I 1 .1 1 I II~I ' ~I o f r I . ~ Y~..I 'n' I~' 4J 11 ~ I s ~ rv I ~ I N I _ ' ~. ~ I t 1 I T N 1 ~I ~ ~ ~ J I j III I _ ~ l ! ~ > A I~ ~ / ~ I r 1. 11 I I \ I ,...j 1 i 1 YS ' I I ~ 1 I ~~ ` ~ ~ . I I ~ ~ 1 i I ~~ i~ - - . I I 41 ~ I~J. ' ~ ~ III'. ~\ I . \r~:;.. ~ fir" .~ Z ~`.~,~ \ 11 ~- ~~ ~ 1 ' ~; '~ ~~~~ - , ~F ~ S{mil I I t ~ ~ _ Z ~ y I i. 1 I I z Y I I •\ '1.~ 1 I I III t ~ ~~~ :~IIJ~~ 1 `1 ( I ~ \ II : O \ d 1 _ ~\ N IzI tl ~ F~ \ ~ ~ I~ 11 ~ Yn - ~ L. I ~~ ~i_ 0 i~ ~T'I~ J~ ~ i , I 1 ~, 1 1 A . ~p1. Ix- 'l 1' ;t 0 K v I I I I . _ .. _ . I y w hV N3NIllIW 1 f i 11 1i1 ~'`I O F ~i r ~ `>>~' ~ U ~ p ~ > ~ > I Y' I l I I i I la , I II ~F ~i%_ M F " ~ F 1i i 1 1 ~ ~ ~ ( I ~: / 111 / ~ ' ( ~ I Ih c 1 ~ 1. ~ J 1 ` I I ; ~ / I t ~~ I J I II I~ I ` Q i ~ 1 1 ~ d ~ O i l I 1I1 lZ II 2 ~1 11 1 ~ ~I / ~ ~ ry I 1 ~1 I I G •~ ~ L w a ; j ~ ~~ I: '"/ T I I wY (^ I ~ ~ n ~ R,z r iP! ~ .il II ~ ~! co Q m . , ~,' I''' 11 '~ III I',111 ~ "~ '~ I ~ I I ~ Io I 6~ ~ 11 I ~, r ~ N 1 ~,. Ltl: 1l J I'•: 1 ~ ( J ~f ., z Q ova ~ I I {1' I ,I 110 1,~ ~1 ~i'`~1 I(' 111 I ~''I ~ ~ "_r ~ ~~'~'~ in I ( (~ a s , ~ y il.ll }{7 t +'> I N - e~ ! ~ y l ~, ~. 1 I d> ~ L rr~ a (./ I Q I I ~~~www ~ ~ O J ~ U~ ~ Z ZU ~ I p d -, . I I / ~11 ~ 1 il. '~ ~~~"t I I~. ~~ ~~' I .~I I O I 'I I I ~I } a I ~ I 1 ~ 1 I I ~ I I I ~ I I ~ t O-Q ' l i m ~I J ~ l ~- UU ~ II ~I I. I it mF1 ° • ' 1~ ~'I:';I i = i N 'I I I ~. I I l f >>F t ~ ' 1~ ' F~ 1 ~ ~~ I ~ I O ' ~ I I ~ g :~ ~~ I I LL I ~ I ' ~ ~ ~ 1 ~N 1 I (/l r 1 _ Il N I I I ~' 1' w ~ "' ~ ' rec n' 'E3~R~3 a s ' 'j . ,/ , Z ~~ I I i ~ . Em~ t E ; i I' l 1 -I -%;, ~ 111 l ~~ O < GUpEc u°a~m g ~ ° r I I 1 I l wr r ~ ~ I' ..; _ /~ j F v S s E i' I ~ 1 ~ .. / Q E E o E ~. 1 I 'I L~ I. ~ _./O ~ ~/' Z'/If ~- I ~ gas' oes E€ ii i ~II: 1 t / ° I II _~~ ~ I r ~~/ / :.1 i / ~fl~ ~ E E r g E `E ~ i ~ll 1 -. I ~ ~~ ~ ~u 1 . 1 ~/ / 1M. ~ ' ' 9°~ E ~% , I 'I' ~- , (/~' I' I~~N T ,.~ O 1 i j11 ~E P~ n I ~ I O ~ / I N~'' ~ Ir. ~:11 ~ ~ I E eU E V ~ 1, O I ! 1 1 I t. ~ 1 : ~I ~ .ma. ; e a_~v ate.. ,,m e.1 ~ ~, . ~ . . ~0 1 I. 1d jlll{;. . I li.. 11 .II - ~~;` , ~ ~ ~ /{V N3~VH , ~ ~ 1, I t I I: I i I I i I ' i~l 1{I ~ ! - I i1 1 I I! ~ 1 I, ~j I ~ Id11) I P205 ESTIMATE OF COSTS The estimated costs of administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing the improvements as described in the Plans and Specifications are summarized below. Each year, as part of the assessment district levy calculation process, the costs and expenses are reviewed and the annual costs are projected for the following fiscal year. District Estimated 2011/12 Bud et Personnel Services Regular Payroll $595,920.00 Overtime Salaries 1,050.00 Part-time Salaries 32,280.00 Frinoe Benefits 282 680.00 Subtotal Personnel $911,930.00 Operations and Maintenance Operations and Maintenance $67,150.00 Vehicle Operations and Maintenance 6,000.00 Equip Operations & Maint 3,750.00 Depreciation -Computer Equip 150.00 Contract Services 367,690.00 Contract Services/Facilities 0.00 Tree Maintenance 10,180.00 Utilities Telephone Utilities 2,560.00 Water Utilities 249,730.00 Electric Utilities 33,960.00 Assessment Administration 23,010.00 General Overhead 177,110.00 Subtotal Operations and Maintenance $941,290.00 Capital Expenditures Capital Outlay -Vehicles 10,780.00 Capital Projects $555.000.00 Subtotal Capital Expenditures $565,780.00 Total District Expenditure Budget ~ $2,419,000.00 Total Estimated Assessment $2,498,140.00 Less Anticipated Delinquencies ~ (119 271.001 Total Estimated Revenues $2,378,870.00 Plus Operating Reserve Fund Contribution 40,130.00 Total Expenditure Budget $2,419,000.00 Total Estimated Assessment $2,498,140.00 Total District EBU Count 6,574.05 Actual Assessment per EBU -Fiscal Year 2011/12 $380.00 Maximum Allowable Assessment er EBU -Fiscal Year 2011/12 $360.00 Landscape Maintenance District No. 4-R -City of Rancho Cucamonga 12 Fiscal Year 2011112 P206 The maximum allowable assessment per EBU listed in the District budget above, is the amount which was approved in 1996/97 and subsequent District annexations. Each year, prior to the assessments being placed on the tax roll, the City will review the budget and determine the amount needed to maintain the improvements for the upcoming fiscal year. The actual assessment per EBU will be based on the estimated costs of maintenance, available fund balance and maximum allowable assessment with the goal of maintaining the improvements in a satisfactory and healthy condition. The actual assessment amount may be lower than the maximum allowable assessment; however it may not exceed the maximum unless the increase is approved by the property owners in accordance with Proposition 218. It is the intent of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to maintain an Operating Reserve which shall not exceed the estimated costs of maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or when the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The reserve balance information for the District is as follows: ' Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2011 Reserve Fund Balance $2,009,670.00 Operating Reserve Contribution -Fiscal Year 2011/12 40,130.00 Operatino Reserve Collection -Fiscal Year 2011/12 0.00 Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2012 Reserve Fund Balance $1,954,640.00 Definitions of Budget Items The following definitions describe the costs and expenses included in the District Budget Personnel Services Reoular Salaries: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all full-time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Part Time Salaries: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all part time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Fringe Benefits: This item includes the benefits available to City employees: health care, vacation, sick time, and retirement fund. Operations and Maintenance Contract Services: This item includes the contract costs of a landscape maintenance company responsible for the ongoing maintenance of the District improvements. Tree Maintenance: This item includes the contract costs attributed to maintaining the street trees and other trees throughout the District. Utilities -Water: This item includes the costs to furnish water for the landscaping within the District. Utilities -Electric: This item includes the costs to furnish electricity required for the operation and maintenance of the sprinklers and irrigation controllers. Assessment Administration: This item includes the cost to all particular departments and staff of the City, and consultants for providing the administration, coordination and management of District services, operations, and incidental expenses related to the District. This item also includes creation of an annual engineer's report, resolutions and placing the assessment amounts onto the County tax Landscape Maintenance District No. 4-R -City of Rancho Cucamonga 13 Fiscal Year 2011112 P207 roll each year, along with responding to any public inquiries and future Proposition 218 balloting proceedings. General Overhead: This item includes the costs of all departments and staff of the City for providing the coordination of District services, inspections, annual bid management, responding to public concerns, public education, accounting, auditing and procedural matters associated with the District: This item also includes an allocation for general City staff time for administrative functions and systems that provide for a functignal and operational assessment district within the City's administrative structure. Capital Expenditures: Capital Projects: This item includes new improvements to further enhance the level and quality of service provided within the boundaries of the District. This may include new monuments, irrigation systems, and other large improvements. Operating Reserve Collection: Ooerating Reserve Collection: This item includes the amountto be collected to maintain reserves to enable the City to pay for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or whenever the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The Reserve Fund contribution will continue until such a time the Reserve Fund balance is approximately one half of the annual costs. The fund may be allowed to accumulate in anticipation of any unforeseen expenses not included in the yearly maintenance costs. This may include, but is not limited to, tree replacements, repair of damaged equipment due to vandalism, storms and other similar events. Landscape Maintenance District No. 4-R -City of Rancho Cucamonga 14 Fiscal Year 2011/12 P208 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT General Pursuant to the 1972 Act and Article XIII D, all parcels that have a special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements and services shall be identified, and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel shall be determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of improvements. The 1972 Act, permits the establishment of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include the operation, maintenance and servicing of landscaping improvements. Section 22573 of the 1972 Act requires that maintenance assessments must be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. This Section states: "The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district maybe apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots orparcels in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements." The determination of whether or not a lot or paroel will benefit from the improvements shall be made pursuant to the Improvement Act of 1911 (Division 7 (commencing with Section 5000) (of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California]." The 1972 Act also permits the designation of zones of benefit within any individual assessment district if "by reasons or variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive different degrees of benefit from the improvement" (Sec. 22547). Article XIII D, Section 4(a) of the California Constitution limits the amount of any assessment to the proportional special benefit conferred on the property. Article XIII D also provides that publicly owned properties must be assessed unless there is clear and convincing evidence that those properties receive no special benefit from the assessment. Exempted from the assessment would be the areas of public streets, public avenues, public lanes, public roads, public drives, public courts, public alleys, public easements and rights-of-ways, public greenbelts and public parkways. The net amount to be assessed may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels. Proposition 218, approved by the voters in November 1996, requires the City to separate general benefit from special benefit, where only special benefit is assessed. Benefit The maintenance and servicing of the improvements within the District (which are described in the Description of Improvements and Services Section of this report) are for the benefit of the properties within the District, and as such confer a special and direct benefit to parcels within the District by: improving the livability, appearance, and desirability for properties within the boundaries of the District, and ensuring that improvements do not reach a state of deterioration or disrepair so as to be materially detrimental to properties within the District, and Landscape Maintenance District No. 4-R -City of Rancho Cucamonga 15 Fiscal Year 2011 /12 P209 • providing beautification, shade and overall enhancement to properties within the District. The above mentioned items affect the assessed property in a way that is particular and distinct from their effect on other parcels and that real property in general and the public at large do not share. They contribute to a specific enhancement of the properties within the District. Since these improvements, including the community trails, were installed and are maintained specifically for the properties within the District; only properties within the District receive a special benefit and are assessed for said maintenance. General Benefit In addition to the special benefits received by parcels within the District, there are derivative general benefits that are conferred on parcels outside the boundaries of the District which include: • the control of dust and insect infestations, and • the visual enhancement of the area to persons or vehicles that may travel through the District. However it has been determined that these benefits are derivative and do not provide a direct benefit to parcels outside of the district that are not being assessed. Method of Assessment Spread Each of the parcels within the District is deemed to receive special benefit from the improvements. Each parcel that has a special benefit conferred upon it as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements are identified and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel is determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of the improvements. When the District was formed in 1984, Article XIII D and Proposition 218 had not yet been passed. Upon the passage of Article XIII D and the subsequent passage of the Proposition Omnibus Implementation Act, new rules were put into place. Due to the changes in legal requirements, as property annexed to the District after the passage of the Assessment Law, the description of the method of assessment became more refined, however, the assessment per parcel has remained the same since the 1996/97 Fiscal Year. Further, no parcel included in the District formation or annexations prior to when the language was refined, are now being levied differently than they were at the time the District was formed or the parcels were annexed. To assess special benefit appropriately, it is necessary to relate the different type of parcel improvements to each other. The Equivalent Benefit Unit ("EBU") method of apportionment uses the single family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single family home equals one Equivalent Benefit Unit (EBU). Every other land-use is converted to EBUs based on an assessment formula that equates to the property's specific development status, type of development (land-use), and size of the property, as compared to a-single family home. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land-use types, as assigned by County use code, to determine each parcel's EBU assignment. Landscape Maintenance District No. 4-R -City of Rancho Cucamonga 16 Fiscal Year 2011/12 P210 Land-Use E uivalent Dwellin Units Pro ert T e Count Use Code EBU Value Multi lier Single Family Residential 1.00 Dwelling Unit Condominium 0.80 Dwelling Unit Multi -Family - 0.70 Dwelling Unit Commercial/ Industrial 3.25 Acre Vacant (incl. all undeveloped property) 0.25 Acre Schools 0.25 Acre The use of the latest County Assessor's Secured Roll shall be the basis for the Property Type determination and units/acreage assignments, unless better data is available to the City. In addition, if any parcel within the District is identified by the County Auditor/Controller to be an invalid parcel number for the current fiscal year, the Property Type and EBU assignment shall be based on the. correct parcel number and/or new parcel number(s) County use code and subsequent property information. If a single parcel has changed to multiple parcels, the EBU assignment and assessment amount applied to each of the new parcels will be recalculated rather than spread the proportionate share of the original assessment. The following table summarizes the Fiscal Year 2011/12 maximum allowable assessment rates for the District: Property Type (County Use Code) Maximum Allowable Assessment Rate er EBU Actual Assessment Rate per EBU Total UnitslAcres Total EBUs Single Family Residential $380.00 $380.00 2,652.00 2,652.00 Condominium $380.00 $380.00 1,395.00 1,116.00 Multi-family $380.00 $380.00 3,139.00 2,197.30 Commercial/Industrial $380.00 $380.00 176.28 572.91 Vacant $380.00 $380.00 107.96 26.99 Schools $380.00 $380.00 35.41 .8.85 The total amount of maintenance and incidental costs for maintaining the landscaping and community trail improvements is assessed to the individual parcels of real property within the District in proportion to the special benefit received by such parcels of real property. The proposed individual assessments are shown on the assessment roll in this report. Landscape Maintenance District No. 4-R -City of Rancho Cucamonga 17 Fiscal Year 2011/12 P211 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM An Assessment Diagram for the District is shown on the following page. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the County Assessor of the County San Bernardino, at the time this report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Engineer's Report. Landscape Maintenance District No. 4-R -City of Rancho Cucamonga 18 Fiscal Year 2011/12 P212 1 w 'i . V C `I^nl i .~ Q V J ny ua~pl!W ny uaneH ny esowiaH nb' Pleq!4oiH ny uewllaH lg ue!lawe~ U 2~ U~ /, t6 ~U C N ny ~alsayooa ~..__- ~ ~ c N T ~ C N ~N N N _ ny IGia4~ a o! C J m ~ r o 3 m !ts li 0 Q ' E ~ J O C CJ ~ ~ ^~ J tir~ Yn 0 r lse3 in t v -"-•'-'~ ny epuenny3 ny ~alsayooa ny ua~!II!W ny uaneH J ny esow~aH nH PIeQ!4o~'d ~ ~ ~~ ny uewllaH • ,A• t ny p e~(au!n F4 s~t s~ce : ~ •~' ~€ t{F=• ea a gp~8x $e i4 [O c ~ co ~~ ~3 pY ~ L ~ O Q OD e~°{r~~~F Q £ 0 0 li p~5 ~ ~e~~i:~ { 4 gF Ggy~YS~pFFFE {$~ &i~f2E3 ~EI~ q 3333 ~~ g~p pEg6. R p R $ ~XFaki~~~~t2 P213 ASSESSMENT ROLL Assessment Roll The assessment roll is a listing of the assessment for Fiscal Year 2011/12 apportioned to each lot or parcel, as shown on the last equalized roll of the Assessor of the County of San Bernardino. The following tables summarize the Fiscal Year 2011112 maximum and actual assessments for the District: Property Type Coun Use Code Maximum Allowable Assessment Rate er EBU Total UnitslAcres Total EBUs Maximum Allowable Assessment Single Family Residential $380.00 2,652.00 2,652.00 $1,007,760.00 Condominium $380.00 1,395.00 1,116.00 $424,080.00. Multi-family $360.00 3,139.00 2,197.30 $834,974.00 Commercial/Industrial $380.00 176.28 572.91 $217,705.80 Vacant $380.00 107.96 26.99 $10,256.20 Schools $380.00 35.41 8.85 $3,363.95 Property Type Count Use Code Actual Assessment Rate er EBU Total Units/Acres Total EBUs Actual Assessment Single Family Residential $380.00 2,652.00 2,652.00 $1,007,760.00 Condominium $360.00 1,395.00 1,116.00 $424,080.00 Multi-family $380.00 3,139.00 2,197.30 $834,974.00 Commercial/Industrial $380.00 176.28 572.91 $217,705.80 Vacant $360.00 107.96 26.99 $10,256.20 Schools $380.00 35.41 8.85 $3,363.95 A copy of the full assessment roll is available for review in the City Clerk's office. Annexations There were no annexations effective for the 2011/12 Fiscal Year: Landscape Maintenance District No. 4-R -City of Rancho Cucamonga 19 Fiscal Year 2011 /12 P214 Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2011/2012 City of Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 (dot Lot) P215 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 5 (TOT LOT) 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Phone: 909.477.2740 Fax: 909.477.2741 CITY COUNCIL L. Dennis Michael, Mayor Sam Spagnolo, Mayor Pro Tem William Alexander, Council Member Chuck Buquet, Council Member Diane Williams, Council Member CITY STAFF John R. Gillison, Assistant City Manager Linda D. Daniels, Deputy City Manager William Wittkopf, Public Works Director Ingrid Y. Bruce, GIS/Special Districts Manager Christopher Bopko, Management Analyst III P216 TABLE OF CONTENTS ENGINEER'S LETTER INTRODUCTION 1 3 Reason for Assessment .............................................................................................3 Process for Annual Assessment .................................................................................3 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS ~ 5 Description of the Boundaries of the District ...............................................................5 Description of Improvements and Services ................................................................5 Map of Improvements .................................................................................................5 ESTIMATE OF COSTS 6 District Budget ............................................................................................................6 Definitions of Budget Items .........................................................................................7 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT 9 General .......................................................................................................................9 Special Benefit ..........................................................................................................10 General Benefit ........................................................................................................ Method of Assessment Spread ................................................................................10 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM ASSESSMENT ROLL 12 13 Assessment Roll .......................................................................................................13 Annexations ..............................................................................................................13 P217 ENGINEER'S LETTER WHEREAS, on July 6, 2011, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga (the "City"), under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 (the "1972 Act") adopted its Resolution No. 11-098, a Resolution Initiating Proceedings for the Levy of Annual Assessments for Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 (Tot Lot) (the "District"); and WHEREAS, the Resolution Initiating Proceedings directed staff to prepare and file an Engineer's Report for Fiscal Year 2011/12 pursuant to the requirements of the 1972 Act. The Engineer's Report presents the plans and specifications describing the general nature, location and extent of the improvements to be maintained, an estimate of the costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements for the District for the referenced fiscal year, a diagram for the District, showing the area and properties proposed to be assessed, and an assessment of the estimated costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing the improvements, assessing the net amount upon all assessable lots and/or parcels within the District in proportion to the special benefit received; and NOW THEREFORE, the following assessment is proposed to be authorized in order to pay the estimated costs of maintenance, operation and servicing of the improvements to be paid by the assessable real property within the boundaries of the District in proportion to the special benefit received. The following table summarizes the proposed assessment. SUMMARY OF ASSESSMENT Fiscal Year 2011112 Total Estimated Assessment $4,980.00 Plus Anticipated Delinquency Penalty 1 070.00 Total Estimated Revenue ~ $6,050.00 Less Reserve Fund Contribution 0.00 Total Expenditure Budget $6050.00 Total District EBU Count 44.00 Actual Assessment per EBU $113.29 Maximum Allowable Assessment per EBU $113.29 In making the assessments contained herein pursuant to the 1972 Act: I have identified all parcels which will have a special benefit conferred upon them from the improvements described in the Special Benefit Section of this Engineer's Report (the "Specially Benefited Parcels"). For particulars as to the identification of said parcels, reference is made to the Assessment Diagram, a copy of which is included in this Engineer's Report. 2. I have evaluated the costs and expenses of the improvements upon the Specially Benefited Parcels. In making such evaluation: Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2011/12 P218 a. The proportionate special benefit derived by each Specially Benefited Parcel from the improvements was determined in relationship to the entirety of the maintenance costs of the improvements; b. No assessment has been imposed on any Specially Benefited Parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on such parcel from the improvements; and c. Any general benefits from the improvements have been separated from the special benefits and only special benefits have been assessed. I, the undersigned, respectfully submit the enclosed Engineer's Report and, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, the Engineer's Report, Assessments, and the Assessment Diagram herein have been prepared and computed in accordance with the order of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Assessment Law. Mark A. Steuer, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2011/12 P219 INTRODUCTION Reason for Assessment Approval of the assessment covered by this Engineer's Report will generate the revenue necessary to: Provide for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements described in this Engineer's Report. Maintenance may include but is not limited to, all of the following: the repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement, providing for the life, growth, health and beauty of the landscaping, including cultivation, irrigation, trimming, spraying, fertilizing or treating for disease or injury, the removal of trimming, rubbish, debris and other solid waste, the maintenance, repair and replacement as necessary of all irrigation systems and the removal of graffiti from walls immediately adjacent to the cultivated areas. Servicing means the furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operating and servicing of any improvement. Servicing shall also include vehicle, equipment, capital improvements and administrative costs associated with the annual administration and operation of the District. Process for Annual Assessment The City cannot levy and collect annual assessments within the District without complying with the procedures specified in the 1972 Act. On an annual basis, an Engineer's Report must be prepared which contains a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the district. The City Council must also adopt a resolution of intention which: • Declares the intention of the City Council to levy and collect assessments within the assessment district for the fiscal year stated therein. • Generally describes the existing and proposed improvements and any substantial changes proposed to be made in existing improvements. • Refers to the assessment district by its distinctive designation and indicate the general location of the district. • Refers to the report of the engineer, on file with the clerk, for a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the district. • Gives notice of the time and place for public hearing by the City Council on the levy of the proposed assessment. • States whether the assessment is proposed to increase from the previous year. If the assessments are to be levied in the same or lesser amounts than the maximum assessment amount approved, the clerk shall give notice by causing the resolution of intention to be published. Any interested person may, prior to the conclusion of the public hearing, file a written protest which shall state all grounds of objection. The protest shall contain a description sufficient to identify the property owned by the property owner filing the protest. During the course or upon conclusion of the hearing, the City Council may order changes in any of the matters provided in the report, including changes in the improvements, any zones within the assessment district, and the proposed diagram or the proposed assessment. The City Council, upon conclusion of the public hearing must then adopt a resolution confirming the diagram and assessment, either as originally proposed or as changed by it. The adoption of the resolution shall constitute the levy of an assessment for the fiscal year referred to in the assessment. Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2011/12 P220 If the assessment to be levied exceeds the maximum assessment amount previously approved, the City must comply with the procedures specified in Article XIII D and Proposition 218. The voters in the State of California in November 1996 added Article XIII D to the California Constitution imposing, among other requirements, the necessity for the City to conduct an assessment ballot procedure to enable the owners of each property on which assessments are proposed to be enacted or increased, the opportunity to express their support for, or opposition to the proposed assessment or increase in such assessment. The basic steps of the assessment ballot procedure are outlined below. The City must prepare a Notice of Public Hearing ("Notice"), which describes, along with other mandated information, the reason for the proposed assessments, and to provide a date and time of a public hearing to be held on the matter. The City must also prepare an assessment ballot, which clearly gives the property owner the ability to sign and mark their assessment ballot either in favor of, or in opposition to the proposed assessment. The Notice and assessment ballot are mailed to each affected property owner within the District a minimum of 45 days prior to the public hearing date as shown in the Notice. The City may also hold community meetings with the property owners to discuss the issues facing the District and to answer property owner questions directly. After the Notice and assessment ballot are mailed, property owners are given until the close of the public hearing, stated in the Notice, to return their signed and marked assessment ballot. During the public hearing, property owners are given the opportunity to address the City Council and ask questions or voice their concerns. At the public hearing, the returned assessment ballots received prior to the close of the public hearing are tabulated, weighted by the proposed assessment amount on each property and the results are announced by the City Council. Article XIII D provides that if, as a result of the assessment ballot proceeding, a majority protest is found to exist, the City Council shall not have the authority to levy and collect the assessments as proposed. A majority protest exists if the assessments represented by ballots submitted in opposition exceed those submitted in favor of the assessment. All returned ballots are tabulated and weighted according to the financial obligation of each particular parcel. If there is no majority protest as described above, the City Council may approve the proposed assessments. If there is a majority protest, as described above, the City will not levy and collect any assessments. Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2011/12 P221 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS The District provides for the administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing of various improvements located within the public right-of-way and dedicated easements within the boundaries of the District. Description of the Boundaries of the District The District is located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California. The boundaries of the District are generally described as that area of the City bounded by Hermosa Avenue on the west, 26`" Avenue on the south, the parcels north of and along Bedford Drive and the parcels west of and along Andover Place. Reference is also made to the Assessment Diagram included in this Report. Description of Improvements and Services The improvements are the maintenance and servicing of landscaping sites and appurtenant facilities throughout the District. The landscaping maintenance includes, but is not limited to, shrubs, turf, tree trimming, weed and pest control, landscape irrigation systems and testing, trash, debris and graffiti removal, and associated appurtenant facilities. Services include personnel, materials, contracting services, utilities, and all necessary costs associated with the maintenance, replacement and repair required to keep the improvements in a healthy, vigorous and satisfactory condition. In addition, it is the City's intention to continue to use cost effective materials, including the future ability to replace landscaping with drought resistant or low water use plants, in order to lower expenses of the District. The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows: Parks: Tot Lot. Site # Descriptive Location I-1-5 The tot lot on the southwest corner of Andover and Bedford. Ground Cover area: 1,506 square feet Turf area: 1,070 square feet Parks are maintained by the City's Park Maintenance Crews Map of Improvements The following page shows the map of landscaping improvements, including irrigation sites and community trails, to be maintained using District funds. Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2011!12 i I ~ ~ ' ' j 1 1 Z ~ `'. i ~ ~ ~ ~ i I I i ~ V i ~ j ~ I I ~ ~~ ~'~~ ~~~ ~ ~~~ i i ~ I i ~ i i ~ ~ i ~ i ~ ~ ~; ~ ~ i I O Z li i = . yam„ i I i ~ y 4 ~ Q~ ~ i I V C ~ `1./ C ~ ~ 1 ~Ir .~ , Q ! i i i i i i ~ L ~. ~ ! V I ~ i i f I ' i i r«< w ~ ' w d Z w C Z Z C O !qJ~ O ~ Q J ~1 ~. W ~ r" ~ Y Q O W ~' a ~ a ~ ~ ~ a o ^O i I'~ i ~ I - ~ i ~ i ~ i ~ i i ~ ~ ~ I a~ O LL v> ~ '7 i I ~ i ii ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ' ~ ~ M i ~ i ~ ~~ ~ 0 ~ ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i I i I O it ~ ~ 1 i O ~ i 3H ~ ; ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ .. __ Q,' `~~ I ' .Yi Z ~ I ~ U ~ ~ ~ I ~~~// Q ~ ~ i __ ~/ EEE~~~s3E ~ti-ESS^ee `o cc°~`o ~p °p, ,p~ Q~m"m'a~a~ ~r"-€pCi^mm to°gm.z `` _°mo-`~~3:m ~~uoug_m ~ os mr£u'~~2 I a~s'$~; I ~m~°-~E •; 8~8E i pPE ["cm Euo aC $9..~$c' _2 ~_ __ €omPEe €Z:S~~m aam,..om P223 ESTIMATE OF COSTS The estimated costs of administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing the improvements as described in the Plans and Specifications are summarized below. Each year, as part of the assessment district levy calculation process, the costs and expenses are reviewed and the annual costs are projected for the following fiscal year. District Budget Estimated 2011/12 Bud et Personnel Services Regular Payroll $0.00 Part-time Salaries 0.00 Fringe Benefits 0.00 Subtotal Personnel $0.00 Operations and Maintenance Operations and Maintenance $800.00 Vehicle Operations and Maintenance 70.00 Contract Services 1,690.00 Contract Services/Facilities 0.00 Tree Maintenance 0.00 Utilities Water Utilities 420.00 Electric Utilities 480.00 Assessment Administration 240.00 General Overhead 360.00 Subtotal Operations and Maintenance $4,060.00 Capital Expenditures Capital Projects $0.00 Subtotal Capital Expenditures $0.00 Total Expenditure Budget $4,060.00 Total Estimated Assessment $4,980.00 Plus Anticipated Delinquency Penalty 1.070.00 Total Estimated Revenue $6,050.00 Less Operating Reserve Fund Collection 0.00 Total Expenditure Budget $6,050.00 Total Estimated Assessment $4,980.00 Total District EBU Count 44.00 Actual Assessment per EBU -Fiscal Year 2011/12 $113.29 Maximum Allowable Assessment er EBU -Fiscal Year 2011/12 $113.29 The maximum allowable assessment per EBU listed in the District budget above, is the amount which was approved in 1996/97 and subsequent District annexations. Each year, prior to the assessments being placed on the tax roll, the City will review the budget and determine the amount needed to maintain the improvements for the upcoming fiscal year. The actual assessment per EBU will be Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 6 Fiscal Year 2011/12 P224 based on the estimated costs of maintenance, available fund balance and maximum allowable assessment with the goal of maintaining the improvements in a satisfactory and healthy condition. The actual assessment amount may be lower than the maximum allowable assessment; however it may not exceed the maximum unless the increase is approved by the property owners in accordance with Proposition 218. It is the intent of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to maintain an Operating Reserve which shall not exceed the estimated costs of maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or when the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The reserve balance information for the District is as follows: Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2011 Reserve Fund Balance $75,500.00 Operating Reserve Contribution -Fiscal Year 2011/12 0.00 Operating Reserve Collection -Fiscal Year 2011/12 1.070.00 Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2012 Reserve Fund Balance $76,570.00 Definitions of Budget Items The following definitions describe the costs and expenses included in the District Budget: Personnel Services Regular Salaries: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all full-time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Part Time Salaries: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all part time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Fringe Benefits: This item includes the benefits available to City employees: health care, vacation, sick time, and retirement fund. Operations and Maintenance Contract Services: This item includes the contract costs of a landscape maintenance company responsible for the ongoing maintenance of the District improvements. Tree Maintenance: This item includes the contract costs attributed to maintaining the street trees and other trees throughout the District. Utilities -Water: This item includes the costs to furnish water for the landscaping within the District. Utilities -Electric: This item includes the costs to furnish electricity required for the operation and maintenance of the sprinklers and irrigation controllers. Assessment Administration: This item includes the cost to all particular departments and staff of the City, and consultants for providing the administration, coordination and management of District services, operations, and incidental expenses related to the District. This item also includes creation of an annual engineer's report, resolutions and placing the assessment amounts onto the County tax roll each year, along with responding to any public inquiries and future Proposition 218 balloting proceedings. General Overhead: This item includes the costs of all departments and staff of the City for providing the coordination of District services, inspections, annual bid management, responding to public Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2011/12 P225 concerns, public education, accounting, auditing and procedural matters associated with the District. This item also includes an allocation for general City staff time for administrative functions and systems that provide for a functional and operational assessment district within the City's administrative structure. Capital Expenditures: Capital Projects: This item includes new improvements to further enhance the level and quality of service provided within the boundaries of the District. This may include new monuments, irrigation systems, and other large improvements. Operating Reserve Collection: Operating Reserve Collection: This item includes the amount to be collected to maintain reserves to enable the City to pay for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or whenever the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The'Reserve Fund contribution will continue until such a time the Reserve Fund balance is approximately one half of the annual costs. The fund may be allowed to accumulate in anticipation of any unforeseen expenses not included in the yearly maintenance costs. This may include, but is not limited to, tree replacements, repair of damaged equipment due to vandalism, storms and other similar events. Landscape Maintenance District No. 5'-City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2011/12 P226 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT General Pursuant to the 1972 Act and Article XIII D, all parcels that have a special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements and services shall be identified, and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel shall be determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of improvements. The 1972 Act, permits the establishment of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include the operation, maintenance and servicing of landscaping improvements. Section 22573 of the 1972 Act requires that maintenance assessments must be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. This Section states: "The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district maybe apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benettt to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements." The determination of whether or not a lot or paroel will benefit from the improvements shall be made pursuant to the Improvement Act of 1911 (Division 7 (commencing with Section 5000) (of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California]." The 1972 Act also permits the designation of zones of benefit within any individual assessment district if "by reasons or variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive different degrees of benefit from the improvement" (Sec. 22547). Article XIII D, Section 4(a) of the California Constitution limits the amount of any assessment to the proportional special benefit conferred on the property. Article XIII D also provides that publicly owned properties must be assessed unless there is clear and convincing evidence that those properties receive no special benefit from the assessment. Exempted from the assessment would be the areas of public streets, public avenues, public lanes, public roads, public drives, public courts, public alleys, public easements and rights-of-ways, public greenbelts and public parkways. The net amount to be assessed may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels. Proposition 218, approved by the voters in November 1996, requires the City to separate general benefit from special benefit, where only special benefit is assessed. Benefit The maintenance and servicing of the improvements within the District (which are described in the Description of Improvements and Services Section of this report) are for the benefit of the properties within the District, and as such confer a special and direct benefit to parcels within the District by: improving the livability, appearance, and desirability for properties within the boundaries of the District, and ensuring that improvements do not reach a state of deterioration or disrepair so as to be materially detrimental to properties within the District, and Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2011/12 P227 • providing beautification, shade and overall enhancement to properties within the District. The above mentioned items affect the assessed property in a way that is particular and distinct from their effect on other parcels and that real property in general and the public at large do not share. They contribute to a specific enhancement of the properties within the District. Since these improvements, including the community trails, were installed and are maintained specifically for the properties within the District; only properties within the District receive a special benefit and are assessed for said maintenance. General Benefit In addition to the special benefits received by parcels within the District, there are derivative general benefits that are conferred on parcels outside the boundaries of the District which include: • the control of dust and insect infestations, and • the visual enhancement of the area to persons or vehicles that may travel through the District. However it has been determined that these benefits are derivative and do not provide a direct benefit to parcels outside of the district that are not being assessed. Method of Assessment Spread Each of the parcels within the District is deemed to receive special benefit from the improvements. Each parcel that has a special benefit conferred upon it as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements are identifed and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel is determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of the improvements. When the District was formed in 1984, Article XIII D and Proposition 218 had not yet been passed. Upon the passage of Article XIII D and the subsequent passage of the Proposition Omnibus Implementation Act, new rules were put into place. Due to the changes in legal requirements, as property annexed to the District after the passage of the Assessment Law, the description of the method of assessment became more refined, however, the assessment per parcel has remained the same since the 1996/97 Fiscal Year. Further, no parcel included in the District formation or annexations prior to when the language was refined, are now being levied differently than they were at the time the District was formed or the parcels were annexed. To assess special benefit appropriately, it is necessary to relate the different type of parcel improvements to each other. The Equivalent Benefit Unit ("EBU") method of apportionment uses the single family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single family home equals one Equivalent Benefit Unit (EBU). Every other land-use is converted to EBUs based on an assessment formula that equates to the property's specific development status, type of development (land-use), and size of the property, as compared to a single family home. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land-use types, as assigned by County use code, to determine each parcel's EBU assignment. Land-Use Equivalent Dwelling Units Pro ert T e Count Use Code EBU Value Multi tier Single Family Residential 1.00 Dwelling Unit Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 10 Fiscal Year 2011/12 P228 The use of the latest County Assessor's Secured Roll shall be the basis for the Property Type determination and unitslacreage assignments, unless better data is available to the City. In addition, if any parcel within the District is identified by the County Auditor/Controller to be an invalid parcel number for the current fiscal year, the Property Type and EBU assignment shall be based on the correct parcel number and/or new parcel number(s) County use code and subsequent property information. If a single parcel has changed to multiple parcels, the EBU assignment and assessment amount applied to each of the new parcels will be recalculated rather than spread the proportionate share of the original assessment. The following table summarizes the Fiscal Year 2011/12 maximum allowable assessment rates for the District: Maximum Allowable Property Type Assessment Rate Actual Assessment Total Total (County Use Code) er EBU Rate per EBU Units/Acres EBUs Single Family Residential $113.29 $113.29 44 44 The total amount of maintenance and incidental costs for maintaining the landscaping and community trail improvements is assessed to the individual parcels of real property within the District in proportion to the special benefit received by such parcels of real property. The proposed individual assessments are shown on the assessment roll in this report. Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 11 Fiscal Year 2011 /12 P229 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM An Assessment Diagram for the District is shown on the following page. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the County Assessor of the County San Bernardino, at the time this report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Engineer's Report. Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 12 Fiscal Year 2011 /12 P230 ~+ +~. V 'i `IIVw O C .C Q V G ny ua~!II!W o i'~ - ny ti~ay~ ... ~ ~ ~ m ~ ro o 0 ~ .. 3 Fi Q N .~ J O C CJ ~ d ~ ~~ J ~'r N N ® N 0 0 N O - -- i nt/ 1se3 in i n e uenn! i ` i ..~.~. ~ ny epuenn93 d P 131 I ~~~ ~ ~aa~~ nea ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ n ~a;sa oo ;- - --- ~ i ny ~a;sayooa ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 1 ~ ~ ~ i--- ~ -. ____. ._ .. ny uaneH ~-- i ny esow~aH i- -- i nH PIe9!yoiH ~- j i ny uewllaH i I 1S ue!lawe~ ,o ..__ ~ d' C N j, v c y m S s .~ ~ N ~ L J m N ~ N N m my uaneH I i I~!ny esow~aH j i -- Inb' Ple4l4o~H i i r" N ny uewllaH ~..~• L ~' L ~ ny p eRau!n ..._..--- - -; ny anal m ~ • • (~ = 3 L L O W O Q LL sip iaFif•~ ~SgB ie •eF'p~ 6~sezz€E ~i•£ g4C L~~P 3~F'E~e ~..uifepp4 ae~ €~~~~SCC;a~~~ E~g~.s~¢t~$ REF: B?~@s ~. iE P231 ASSESSMENT ROLL Assessment Roll The assessment roll is a listing of the assessment for Fiscal Year 2011112 apportioned to each lot or parcel, as shown on the last equalized roll of the Assessor of the County of San Bernardino. The following tables summarize the Fiscal Year 2011/12 maximum and actual assessments for the District: Maximum Allowable ~ Maximum Property Type Assessment Rate Total Total Allowable Coun Use Code er EBU UnitslAcres EBUs Assessment Single Family Residential $113.29 44 44 $4,984.76 Actual Property Type Assessment Rate Total Total Actual Coun Use Code er EBU Units/Acres EBUs Assessment Single Family Residential $113.29 44 44 $4,984.76 A copy of the full assessment roll is available for review in the City Clerk's office. Annexations There were no annexations effective for the 2011/12 Fiscal Year: Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 13 Fiscal Year 2011/12 P232 Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2011/2012 City of Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 6-R (Caryn Planned Community) P233 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 6 (CARYN PLANNED COMMUNITY) 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Phone: 909.477.2700 Fax: 909.477.2741 CITY COUNCIL L. Dennis Michael, Mayor Sam Spagnolo, Mayor Pro Tem William Alexander, Council Member Chuck Buquet, Council Member Diane Williams, Council Member CITY STAFF John R. Gillison, Assistant City Manager Linda D. Daniels, Deputy City Manager William Wittkopf, Public Works Director Ingrid Y. Bruce, GISISpecial Districts Manager Christopher Bopko, Management Analyst III P234 TABLE OF CONTENTS ENGINEER'S LETTER INTRODUCTION 1 3 Reason for Assessment .............................................................................................3 Process for Annual Assessment .................................................................................3 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS 5 Description of the Boundaries of the District ...............................................................5 Description of Improvements and Services ................................................................5 Map of Improvements .................................................................................................8 ESTIMATE OF COSTS 9 District Budget ............................................................................................................9 Definitions of Budget Items .......................................................................................10 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT 12 General .....................................................................................................................12 Special Benefit .........................................................................................................12 General Benefit ........................................................................................................13 Method of Assessment Spread ................................................................................13 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM ASSESSMENT ROLL 15 16 Assessment Roll .......................................................................................................16 Annexations ..............................................................................................................16 P235 ENGINEER'S LETTER WHEREAS, on July 6, 2011, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga (the "City"), under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 (the "1972 Act") adopted its Resolution No. 11-098, a Resolution Initiating Proceedings for the Levy of Annual Assessments for Landscape Maintenance District No. 6 (Caryn Planned Community) (the "District"); and WHEREAS, the Resolution Initiating Proceedings directed staff to prepare and file an Engineer's Report for Fiscal Year 2011/12 pursuant to the requirements of the 1972 Act. The Engineer's Report presents the plans and specifications describing the general nature, location and extent of the improvements to be maintained, an estimate of the costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements for the District for the referenced fiscal year, a diagram for the District, showing the area and properties proposed to be assessed, and an assessment of the estimated costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing the improvements, assessing the net amount upon all assessable lots and/or parcels within the District in proportion to the special benefit received; and NOW THEREFORE, the following assessment is proposed to be authorized in order to pay the estimated costs of maintenance, operation and servicing of the improvements to be paid by the assessable real property within the boundaries of the District in proportion to the special benefit received. The following table summarizes the proposed assessment. SUMMARY OF ASSESSMENT Fiscal Year 2011/12 Total Estimated Assessment $436,090.00 Less Anticipated Delinquencies 25 630.00 Total Estimated Revenue $412,460.00 Plus Reserve Fund Contribution 38,390.00 Total Expenditure Budget $450,850.00 Total District EBU Count 1,196.98 Actual Assessment per EBU $366.00 Maximum Allowable Assessment per EBU $366.00 In making the assessments contained herein pursuant to the 1972 Act: I have identified all parcels which will have a special benefit conferred upon them from the improvements described in the Special Benefit Section of this Engineer's Report (the "Specially Benefited Parcels"). For particulars as to the identification of said parcels, reference is made to the Assessment Diagram, a copy of which is included in this Engineer's Report. 2. I have evaluated the costs and expenses of the improvements upon the Specially Benefited Parcels. In making such evaluation: Landscape Maintenance District No. 6-R -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2011/12 P236 a. The proportionate special benefit derived by each Specially Benefited Parcel from the improvements was determined in relationship to the entirety of the maintenance costs of the improvements; b. No assessment has been imposed on any Specially Benefited Parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on such parcel from the improvements; and c. Any general benefits from the improvements have been separated from the special benefits and only special benefits have been assessed. I, the undersigned, respectfully submit the enclosed Engineer's Report and, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, the Engineer's Report, Assessments, and the Assessment Diagram herein have been prepared and computed in accordance with the order of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Assessment Law. Mark A. Steuer, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Landscape Maintenance District No. 6-R -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2011/12 P237 INTRODUCTION Reason for Assessment Approval of the assessment covered by this Engineer's Report will generate the revenue necessary to: Provide for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements desdribed in this Engineer's Report. Maintenance may include but is not limited to, all of the following: the repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement, providing for the life, growth, health and beauty of the landscaping, including cultivation, irrigation, trimming, spraying, fertilizing or treating for disease or injury, the removal of trimming, rubbish, debris and other solid waste, the maintenance, repair and replacement as necessary of all irrigation systems and the removal of graffiti from walls immediately adjacent to the cultivated areas. Servicing means the furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operating and servicing of any improvement. Servicing shall also include vehicle, equipment, capital improvements and administrative costs associated with the annual administration and operation of the District. Process for Annual Assessment The City cannot levy and collect annual assessments within the District without complying with the procedures specified in the 1972 Act. On an annual basis, an Engineer's Report must be prepared which contains a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the district. The City Council must also adopt a resolution of intention which: • Declares the intention of the City Council to levy and collect assessments within the assessment district for the fiscal year stated therein. • Generally describes the existing and proposed improvements and any substantial changes proposed to be made in existing improvements. • Refers to the assessment district by its distinctive designation and indicate the general location of the district. • Refers to the report of the engineer, on file with the clerk, for a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the district. • Gives notice of the time and place for public hearing by the City Council on the levy of the proposed assessment. • States whether the assessment is proposed to increase from the previous year. If the assessments are to be levied in the same or lesser amounts than the maximum assessment amount approved, the clerk shall give notice by causing the resolution of intention to be published. Any interested person may, prior to the conclusion of the public hearing, file a written protest which shall state all grounds of objection. The protest shall contain a description suffcient to identify the property owned by the property owner filing the protest. During the course or upon conclusion of the hearing, the City Council may order changes in any of the matters provided in the report, including changes in the improvements, any zones within the assessment district, and the proposed diagram or the proposed assessment. The City Council, upon conclusion of the public hearing must then adopt a resolution confirming the diagram and assessment, either as originally proposed or as changed by it. The adoption of the resolution shall constitute the levy of an assessment for the fiscal year referred to in the assessment. Landscape Maintenance District No. 6-R -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2011/12 P238 If the assessment to be levied exceeds the maximum assessment amount previously approved, the City must comply with the procedures specified in Article XIII D and Proposition 218. The voters in the State of California in November 1996 added Article XIII D to the California Constitution imposing, among other requirements, the necessity for the City to conduct an assessment ballot procedure to enable the owners of each property on which assessments are proposed to be enacted or increased, the opportunity to express their support for, or opposition to the proposed assessment or increase in such assessment. The basic steps of the assessment ballot procedure are outlined below. The City must prepare a Notice of Public Hearing ("Notice'), which describes, along with other mandated information, the reason for the proposed assessments, and to provide a date and time of a public hearing to be held on the matter. The City must also prepare an assessment ballot, which clearly gives the property owner the ability to sign and mark their assessment ballot either in favor of, or in opposition to the proposed assessment. The Notice and assessment ballot are mailed to each affected property owner within the District a minimum of 45 days prior to the public hearing date as shown in the Notice. The City may also hold community meetings with the property owners to discuss the issues facing the District and to answer property owner questions directly. After the Notice and assessment ballot are mailed, property owners are given until the close of the public hearing, stated in the Notice, to return their signed and marked assessment ballot. During the public hearing, property owners are given the opportunity to address the City Council and ask questions or voice their concerns. At the public hearing, the returned assessment ballots received prior to the close of the public hearing are tabulated, weighted by the proposed assessment amount on each property and the results are announced by the City Council. Article XIII D provides that if, as a result of the assessment ballot proceeding, a majority protest is found to exist, the City Council shall not have the authority to levy and collect the assessments as proposed. A majority protest exists if the assessments represented by ballots submitted in opposition exceed those submitted in favor of the assessment. All returned ballots are tabulated and weighted according to the financial obligation of each particular parcel. If there is no majority protest as described above, the City Council may approve the proposed assessments. If there is a majority protest, as described above, the City will not levy and collect any assessments. Landscape Maintenance District No. 6-R -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2011/12 P239 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS The District provides for the administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing of various improvements located within the public right-of-way and dedicated easements within the boundaries of the District. Description of the Boundaries of the District The District is located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California. The boundaries of the District are generally described as that area of the City known as the Caryn Planned Community, which is generally bounded by Milliken Avenue on the west, Banyan Street on the north, Highland Avenue on the south and Rochester Avenue on the east. Reference is also made to the Assessment Diagram included in this Report. Description of Improvements and Services The improvements are the maintenance and servicing of landscaping sites and appurtenant facilities throughout the District. The landscaping maintenance includes, but is not limited to, shrubs, turt, tree trimming, weed and pest control, landscape irrigation systems and testing, trash, debris and graffiti removal, and associated appurtenant facilities: Services include personnel, materials, contracting services, utilities, and all necessary costs associated with the maintenance, replacement and repair required to keep the improvements in a healthy, vigorous and satisfactory condition. In addition, it is the City's intention to continue to use cost effective materials, including the future ability to replace landscaping with drought resistant or low water use plants, in order to lower expenses of the District. The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows: Site # Descriptive Location CC-1 The Southside of Banyan St. from 1290 feet west of Milliken to Milliken. The west side of Milliken & median from Banyan St. to 292 south of Vintage Dr. Ground Cover area: 96,892 square feet Turf area: 17,945 square feet Hardscape area: 13,944 square feet CC-2 For information purposes: This site was deleted 7-1-00 and was combined with CC-1 CC-3 The paseo on the west side of Morning PI. from Morning PI. to Deer Creek Channel. Ground Cover area: 2,801 square feet Turf area: 124 square feet Hardscape area: 4,609 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 6-R -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2011/12 P240 CC-4 The west side of Morning PI., from Banyan St. to Starview PI. The north side of Starview PI., from Morning PI. to Star View Ct. Ground Cover area: 14,273 square feet Turf area: 5,513 square feet Hardscape area: 5,000 square feet CC-5 Silver Sun paseo fro m the end of Silver Sun cul-de-sac to Deer Creek Channel. Ground Cover area: 25,890 square feet Turf area: 12,084 square feet Hardscape area: 1,350 square feet CC-6 The east and west side of Netherlands View Loop from Vintage Dr. to Vintage Dr. The Netherlands View Loop paseo from Netherlands View Loop to Mt Sterling Ct. Ground Cover area: 88,902 square feet Turf area: 676 square feet Hardscape area: 23,650 square feet CC-7 The east and west side of Hillview Loop from Mt. Rainer Ct. to Kettle Peak. Ground Cover area: 14,930 square feet Turt area: 6,318 square feet Hardscape area: 12,236 square feet CC-8 The paseo from Hillview Loop to Vintage Dr. Ground Cover area: 42,107 square feet Turf area: 22,752 square feet Hardscape area: 4,089 square feet CC-9 The south side of Vintage Dr. from 250 feet west of Hillview Loop to Hillview Loop. The west side of Hillview Loop from Vintage Dr. to Kettle Peak. The west side of Kettle Peak from Hillview Loop to Donner Pass Ct. The east side of Hillview Loop from Kettle Peak to Tioga Peak. Ground Cover area: 47,334 square feet Turf area: 4,954 square feet Hardscape area: 9,088 square feet CC-10 The east side of Terrace View Loop from Vintage Dr. to Butler Peak. The west side of Terrace View Loop from Rainbow Falls Ct. to Vintage Dr. Ground Cover area: 24,603 square feet Hardscape area: 10,760 square feet CC-11 The paseo from Caryn School to Banyan St. The south side of Banyan St. from the paseo to Rochester Ave. The east and west side of Mt. Baldy Ct. from Banyan St. to Sierra Crest View Loop. The north side of Sierra Crest View Loop from Hilltop Ct. to Woodland Ct. Ground Cover area: 47,507 square feet Turt area: 7,810 square feet Hardscape area: 7,825 square feet CC-12 The Separation Paseo from Vintage Dr. to Pinnacle Peak. Ground Cover area: 50,325 square feet Turf area: 15,021 square feet Hardscape area: 7,675 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 6.R -City of Rancho Cucamonga 6 Fiscal Year 2011/12 P241 CC-13 The east side of Hillview Loop from Tioga Peak Ct. to Vintage Dr. The south side of Vintage Dr. from Hillview Loop to Terrace View Loop. The north side of Vintage Dr. from Hillview Loop to Caryn School. The east side of Terrace View Loop from Vintage Dr. to Mt. San Antonio Ct. Ground Cover area: 26,162 square feet Turf area: 4,508 square feet Hardscape area: 12,928 square feet CC-14 The east side of Sierra Crest View Loop from Mt. Waverly to Vintage Dr. The north side of Vintage Dr. from Sierra Crest View Loop to Sierra Crest View Loop. The east and west side of Sierra Crest View Loop from Vintage Dr. to Mt. Wilson Ct. The south side of Vintage Dr. from Netherlands View Loop to 330 feet west of Netherlands View Loop. Ground Cover area: 73,250 square feet Turt area: 16,525 square feet Hardscape area: 9,885 square feet CC-15 The south side of Sierra Crest View Loop from Mt. Waverly Ct. to Mt. Cambridge Ct. The north side of Sierra Crest View Loop from Mt. Cambridge Ct. to Woodland Ct. The north side of Sierra Crest View Loop from Hilltop Ct. to Caryn School. The Sierra Crest View Loop paseo from Sierra Crest View Loop to Mt. Sherman Ct. Ground Cover area: 70,990 square feet Turf area: 7,699 square feet Hardscape area: 20,055 square feet CC-16 The south side of Vintage Dr. from Netherlands View Loop to Rochester Ave. The north side of Vintage Dr. from Rochester Ave. to Sierra Crest View Loop. The east and west side of Sierra Crest View Loop from Mt. Wilson Ct. to Mt. Cambridge Ct. The Netherlands View Loop Paseo from Vintage Dr. to Mt. Sterling Ct. Ground Cover area: 77,202 square feet Turf area: 3,954 square feet Hardscape area: 18,195 square feet CC-17 The east side of Milliken Ave. from Vintage Dr. to Banyan St. Ground Cover area: 13,740 square feet Turt area: 9,088 square feet Hardscape area: 6,460 square feet CC-18 The north side of Vintage Dr. from Milliken Ave. to Hillview Loop. The south side of Vintage Dr. from 104 feet west of Hillview Loop to Milliken Ave. Ground Cover area: 32,287 square feet Turt area: 3,889 square feet Hardscape area: 11,188 square feet CC-19 The Terrace View Loop paseo from Vintage Dr. to Terrace View Loop. Ground Cover area: 17,496 square feet Turt area: 15,617 square feet Hardscape area: 2,736 square feet CC-20 The east side of Terrace View Loop from Mt. San Antonio Ct. to EI Capitan Ct. The west side of Terrace View Loop from Butler Peak PI. to Mt San Antonio Ct. Ground Cover area: 20,627 square feet Turf area: 20,017 square feet Hardscape area: 7,888 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 6-R -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2011/12 P242 CC-21 The west side of Rochester from Banyan to 317 feet south of Vintage Dr. Ground Cover area: 31,292 square feet CC-22 The south side of Vintage Dr. from Terrace View Loop to Sierra Crest View Loop. The east and west side of Hillview Loop from Vintage Dr. to Mt. Rainer Ct. Ground Cover area: 11,609 square feet Turf area: 3,763 square feet Hardscape area: 6,524 square feet CC-23 The south side of Banyan from Milliken to Butler Peak PI. The west side of Butler Peak PI. from Banyan St. to Terrace View Loop. The north side of Terrace View Loop from Butler Peak PI. to Rainbow Falls Ct. Ground Cover area: 12,132 square feet Hardscape area: 528 square feet CC-24 The north side of Terrace View Loop from EI Capitan Ct. to Butler Peak PI. The east side of Butler Peak PI. from Terrace View Loop to Banyan St. The south side of Banyan St. from Butler Peak PI. to 990 feet east of Butler Peak PI. Ground Cover area: 14,452 square feet Hardscape area: 1,600 square feet CC-25 This site was moved to CC-13. This mainline was part of CC-13 and should not have been its own site. CC-26 The east side of Rochester from 210 freeway to Vintage Dr. The north and south side of Vintage from to Rochester to Thunder Mountain Ct. The west side of Rochester from 317 feet south of Vintage Dr. to the 210 freeway. Ground Cover area: 35,037 square feet Hardscape area: 19,779 square feet CC-27 The Milliken median and the westside of Milliken from 292 feet south of Vintage to 210 freeway. Ground Cover area: 13,365 square feet Hardscape area: 12,300 square feet CC-28 The east side of Milliken from Vintage to the 210 freeway right- of- way. Ground Cover area: 17,724 square feet Hardscape area: 8,197 square feet Map of Improvements The following page shows the map of landscaping improvements, including irrigation sites and community trails, to be maintained using District funds. Landscape Maintenance District No. 6-R -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2011/12 i ,I i Z (.J mj i ~ ~ ~ I lilNl VII I c~ ^~ Z L ~_ ~ ~+ V C C d A= ~ W 0 _~ ~. J ~ U I~ U O '. U `~ ~I I 1 i N I IU II ~,U; i~ ~1 N;' /~~ Flo, ~.~1 ~ i~ O ,- , r 'U I ~ ~ U .~.~' ~ I U' ~_ f I , I ~~~~~ a ~) I' LL I I' A i N I ~~ i i ~I it ~_ ), j ~. '- ~I' ~ ~~ ~~ ~ `~, ,~,,, L~ ` ~ . ' _ ~ ~ U i ~ i ~~ ~ =U ~ ~J~ ~ I ~, o; i ~ m ~ UI 1 ~~ ` a ~ , ~~ i - I j ~~ . 11 ~p ~ 1 N , I~ J U o I i U ! J c N O a g a w ~ w z -~ z w ~ O J O 0 W ~ Q w C¢ 9 ~ aU ' Y O CO U O w _ H I- _ ~ 2 ~ 2' -y w 0~ 1 1 ~ 01 1 0 ~ ~ I I ~ fil ~ I ~ I !'. i I i i ~ I I ~ i i ~ G ' ~ ~ ~ ~ i t ! ~ i; I~ i l i l i! M O '„ N li O L' ' ~, Z~ zQ ~ wa ~ Y i ff ,I I ~. ~~ I ~~ m C ~ _ ° ~ d >' N N J m °'_' C omo _ v L.E c~Ey o EoE°cw~ °mpv:°UVV~o E c °vc=v~oo'E c~ o~ o v ~ `o o v v ... ~_ ~ m m' c ~ oc n y y'~m3 mo °ioov ~UgE~c v°amE~`~ma5 °ccoic caw ~.g o>.a o`o ~~~o E m rn v m E t~ E.~ m m~ m° ~° ~-yv m ..U- v O` O m N O F O d d ~p d >. O~ C Gov E"~+d cocv-° =mm'`.m U ~p r U y' ` d v m- N m d. N aU 'o °'~mt vmmcwoyEov m ~ ~c V E o v T~ m~ u a n~ H m y o c_ u E¢~ E °w `v v rna ~ o 0 0 `o > _ tmo-dvo.2'o 0 m° m ~ d L° ° m i°~ o r$ `° n o d n n o :. n v N o c~ v a° E `o -_ E a v ma vZ'~ mt ~'E-'~ ~ ° ° ~n E m aU m ~ E c nU m ~~_ N~~ m v'~ v `o ovvy~~m >.~m H mmr 3oi-°.~r oa'vw~mom iw~o~.io~n.wo ~ i ~ I II ~ V~ !I ; U P244 ESTIMATE OF COSTS The estimated costs of administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing the improvements as described in the Plans and Specifications are summarized below. Each year, as part of the assessment district levy calculation process, the costs and expenses are reviewed and the annual costs are projected for the following fiscal year. District Budget Estimated 2011/12 Budget Personnel Services Regular Payroll $7,230.00 Pad-time Salaries 0.00 Fringe Benefits 3.400.00 Subtotal Personnel $10,630.00 Operations and Maintenance Operations and Maintenance $10,010.00 Vehicle Operations and Maintenance 0.00 Contract Services 279,700.00 Contract Services/Facilities 0.00 Tree Maintenance 16,870.00 Utilities Water Utilities 89,780.00 Electric Utilities 5,950.00 Assessment Administration 7,020.00 General Overhead 30.890.00 Subtotal Operations and Maintenance $440,220.00 Capital Expenditures Capital Projects 0.00 Subtotal Capital Expenditures $0.00 Total District Expenditure Budget $450,650.00 Total Estimated Assessment $436,090.00 Less Anticipated Delinquencies {25 630.00) Total Estimated Revenues $412,460.00 Plus Reserve Fund Contribution 38.390.00 Total Expenditure Budget ~ $450,850.00 Total Estimated Assessment $438,090.00 Total District EBU Count 1,196.97 Actual Assessment per EBU -Fiscal Year 2011/12 $366.00 Max+mum Allowable Assessment er EBU -Fiscal Year 2011/12 $366.00 The maximum allowable assessment per EBU listed in the District budget above, is the amount which was approved in 1996/97 and subsequent District annexations. Each year, prior to the assessments being placed on the tax roll, the City will review the budget and determine the amount needed to maintain the improvements for the upcoming fiscal year. The actual assessment per EBU will be Landscape Maintenance District No. 6-R -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2011112 P245 based on the estimated costs of maintenance, available fund balance and maximum allowable assessment with the goal of maintaining the improvements in a satisfactory and healthy condition. The actual assessment amount may be lower than the maximum allowable assessment; however it may not exceed the maximum unless the increase is approved by the property owners in accordance with Proposition 218. It is the intent of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to maintain an Operating Reserve which shall not exceed the estimated costs of maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or when the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The reserve balance information for the District is as follows: Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2011 Reserve Fund Balance $136,700.00 Operating Reserve Contribution -Fiscal Year 2011!12 (36,390.00) Ooerating Reserve Collection -Fiscal Year 2011/12 0.00 Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2012 Reserve Fund Balance $98,310.00 Definitions of Budget Items The following definitions describe the costs and expenses included in the District Budget Personnel Services Regular Salaries: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all full-time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Part Time Salaries: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all part time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Fringe Benefits: This item includes the benefits available to City employees: health care, vacation, sick time, and retirement fund. Operations and Maintenance Contract Services: This item includes the contract costs of a landscape maintenance company responsible for the ongoing maintenance of the District improvements. Tree Maintenance: This item includes the contract costs attributed to maintaining the street trees and other trees throughout the District. Utilities -Water: This item includes the costs to furnish water for the landscaping within the District. Utilities -Electric: This item includes the costs to furnish electricity required for the operation and maintenance of the sprinklers and irrigation controllers. Assessment Administration: This item includes the cost to all particular departments and staff of the City, and consultants for providirig the administration, coordination and management of District services, operations, and incidental expenses related to the District. This item also includes creation of an annual engineer's report, resolutions and placing the assessment amounts onto the County tax roll each year, along with responding to any public inquiries and future Proposition 218 balloting proceedings. General Overhead: This item includes the costs of all departments and staff of the City for providing the coordination of District services, inspections, annual bid management, responding to public Landscape Maintenance District No. 6-R -City of Rancho Cucamonga 10 Fiscal Year 2011!12 P246 concerns, public education, accounting, auditing and procedural matters associated with the District. This item also includes an allocation for general City staff time for administrative functions and systems that provide for a functional and operational assessment district within the City's administrative structure. Capital Expenditures: Capital Projects: This item includes new improvements to further enhance the level and quality of service provided within the boundaries of the District. This may include new monuments, irrigation systems, and other large improvements. Operating Reserve Collection: Operatino Reserve Collection: This item includes the amount to be collected to maintain reserves to enable the City to pay for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or whenever the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The Reserve Fund contribution will continue until such a time the Reserve Fund balance is approximately one half of the annual costs. The fund may be allowed to accumulate in anticipation of any unforeseen expenses not included in the yearly maintenance costs. This may include, but is not limited to, tree replacements, repair of damaged equipment due to vandalism, storms and other similar events. Landscape Maintenance District No. 6-R -City of Rancho Cucamonga 11 Fiscal Year 2011 /12 P247 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT General Pursuant to the 1972 Act and Article XIII D, all parcels that have a special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements and services shall be identified, and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel shall be determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of improvements. The 1972 Act, permits the establishment of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include the operation, maintenance and servicing of landscaping improvements. Section 22573 of the 1972 Act requires that maintenance assessments must be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. This Section states: "The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district maybe apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements." The determination of whether or not a lot or parcel will benefit from the improvements shall be made pursuant to the Improvement Act of 1911 (Division 7 (commencing with Section 5000) (of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California]." The 1972 Act also permits the designation of zones of benefit within any individual assessment district if "by reasons or variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive different degrees of benefit from the improvement" (Sec. 22547). Article XIII D, Section 4(a) of the California Constitution limits the amount of any assessment to the proportional special benefit conferred on the property. Article XIII D also provides that publicly owned properties must be assessed unless there is clear and convincing evidence that those properties receive no special benefit from the assessment. Exempted from the assessment would be the areas of public streets, public avenues, public lanes, public roads, public drives, public courts, public alleys, public easements and rights-of-ways, public greenbelts and public parkways. The net amount to be assessed may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels. Proposition 218, approved by the voters in November 1996, requires the City to separate general benefit from special benefit, where only special benefit is assessed. Benefit The maintenance and servicing of the improvements within the District (which are described in the Description of Improvements and Services Section of this report) are for the benefit of the properties within the District, and as such confer a special and direct benefit to parcels within the District by: • improving the livability, appearance, and desirability for properties within the boundaries of the District, and • ensuring that improvements do not reach a state of deterioration or disrepair so as to be materially detrimental to properties within the District, and Landscape Maintenance District No. 6-R -City of Rancho Cucamonga 12 Fiscal Year 2011/12 P248 providing beautification, shade and overall enhancement to properties within the District. The above mentioned items affect the assessed property in a way that is particular and distinct from their effect on other parcels and that real property in general and the public at large do not share. They contribute to a specific enhancement of the properties within the District. Since these improvements, including the community trails, were installed and are maintained specifically for the properties within the District; only properties within the District receive a special benefit and are assessed for said maintenance. General Benefit In addition to the special benefits received by parcels within the District, there are derivative general benefits that are conferred on parcels outside the boundaries of the District which include: • the control of dust and insect infestations, and • the visual enhancement of the area to persons or vehicles that may travel through the District. However it has been determined that these benefits are derivative and do not provide a direct benefit to parcels outside of the district that are not being assessed. Method of Assessment Spread Each of the parcels within the District is deemed to receive special benefit from the improvements. Each parcel that has a special benefit conferred upon it as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements are identified and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel is determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of the improvements. When the District was formed in 1984, Article XIII D and Proposition 218 had not yet been passed. Upon the passage of Article XIII D and the subsequent passage of the Proposition Omnibus Implementation Act, new rules were put into place. Due to the changes in legal requirements, as property annexed to the District after the passage of the Assessment Law, the description of the method of assessment became more refined, however, the assessment per parcel has remained the same since the 1996/97 Fiscal Year. Further, no parcel included in the District formation or annexations prior to when the language was refined, are now being levied differently than they were at the time the District was formed or the parcels were annexed. To assess special benefit appropriately, it is necessary to relate the different type of parcel improvements to each other. The Equivalent Benefit Unit ("EBU") method of apportionment uses the single family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single family home equals one Equivalent Benefit Unit (EBU). Every other land-use is converted to EBUs based on an assessment formula that equates to the property's specific development status, type of development (land-use), and size of the property, as compared to a single family home. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land-use types, as assigned by County use code, to determine each parcel's EBU assignment. Landscape Maintenance District No. 6-R -City of Rancho Cucamonga 13 Fiscal Year 2011 /12 P249 Land-Use Equivalent Dwelling Units Pro ert T e Coun Use Code EBU Value Multi tier Single Family Residential - Zone 1 1.00 Dwelling Unit Single Family Residential - Zone 2 0.75 Dwelling Unit School 1.34 Acre Vacant 0.25 Acre The use of the latest County Assessor's Secured Roll shall be the basis for the Property Type determination and units/acreage assignments, unless better data is available to the City. In addition, if any parcel within the District is identified by the County Auditor/Controller to be an invalid parcel number for the current fiscal year, the Property Type and EBU assignment shall be based on the correct parcel number and/or new parcel number(s) County use code and subsequent property information. If a single parcel has changed to multiple parcels, the EBU assignment and assessment amount applied to each of the new parcels will be recalculated rather than spread the proportionate share of the original assessment. The following table summarizes the Fiscal Year 2011/12 maximum allowable assessment rates for the District: Property Type (County Use Code) Maximum Allowable Assessment Rate er EBU Actual Assessment Rate er EBU Total UnitslAcres Total EBUs Single Family Residential -Zone 1 $366.00 $366.00 963.00 963.00 Single Family Residential -Zone 2 $366.00 $366.00 310.00 232.50 School $366.00 $366.00 ~ 1.00 1.34 Vacant $366.00 $366.00 0.54 0.14 The total amount of maintenance and incidental costs for maintaining the landscaping and community trail improvements is assessed to the individual parcels of real property within the District in proportion to the special benefit received by such parcels of real property. The proposed individual assessments are shown on the assessment roll in this report. Landscape Maintenance District No. 6-R -City of Rancho Cucamonga 14 Fiscal Year 2011 /12 P250 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM An Assessment Diagram for the District is shown on the following page. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the County Assessor of the County San Bernardino, at the time this report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Engineer's Report. Landscape Maintenance District No. 6-R -City of Rancho Cucamonga 15 Fiscal Year 2011 /12 P251 N //~~ Ul W/ ~~ V N •~ ~~ N ~1 Q J C ~ N N N (n c ~. N c c Q S ny /(JJay~ ~ U ~ N N O S a (~ ~ ~ J ~ C .i ~ m ~ i ~ ~ ~ 0 m o i '~ ' _.._.. ;nV lse3 vJ i ~ my epueM!;3 ny epuen~!l3 ~ i Q i X18 ~laaJ~-e4 _ ._.f ny Ja;sayooa ° "~ _ ny Ja;sayuo~{ J i.. i i i ny uaneH ~ ny uaneH i ny esowJaH ' _ ny esowJaH i nV Pleq!4oJt/ ; ny PIe9!4oJd i ny uewllaH i ~• "~ ny uewllaH 1 ~~• ~ L ~• L ~ • ny p e~(au!n lS ue!lawe~ i (F!5~~~~z~~~~~ 4£yfEtg. p~f Y L J 3 .~-. ~~E+iY~Y ~~ p4 ' ~ O 5E N Ti5[[, {{ 99gg ~' C m CL Q Fot X~.p (:~ m ~:g{gg N m ~ jeE < ~_ m IE{i~i~4P~y ~ x 0R 4.§ ~ so = ?¢FE a~~'iie5gg U ~a~;~ib ~~d P252 ASSESSMENT ROLL Assessment Roll The assessment roll is a listing of the assessment for Fiscal Year 2011/12 apportioned to each lot or parcel, as shown on the last equalized roll of the Assessor of the County of San Bernardino. The following tables summarize the Fiscal Year 2011/12 maximum and actual assessments for the District: Property Type Coun Use Code Maximum Allowable Assessment Rate er EBU Total Units/Acres Total EBUs Maximum Allowable Assessment Single Family Residential -Zone 1 $366.00 963.00 963.00 $352,456.00 Single Family Residential -Zone 2 $366.00 310.00 232.50 $85,095.00 School $366.00 1.00 1.34 $490.44 Vacant $366.00 0.54 0.14 $51.24 Property Type Coun Use Code Actual Assessment Rate er EBU Total Units/Acres Total EBUs Actual Assessment Single Family Residential -Zone 1 $366.00 963.00 963.00 $352,458.00 Single Family Residential -Zone 2 $366.00 310.00 232.50 $85,095.00 School $366.00 1.00 1.34 $490.44 Vacant $366.00 0.54 0.14 $51.24 A copy of the full assessment roll is available for review in the City Clerk's offce. Annexations There were no annexations effective for the 2011/12 Fiscal Year: Landscape Maintenance District No. 6-R -City of Rancho Cucamonga 16 Fiscal Year 2011/12 P253 Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2011/2012 City of Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 (North Etiwanda) P254 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 7 (NORTH ETIWANDA) 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Phone: 909.477.2740 Fax: 909.477.2741 CITY COUNCIL L. Dennis Michael, Mayor Sam Spagnolo, Mayor Pro Tem William Alexander, Council Member Chuck Buquet, Council Member Diane Williams, Council Member CITY STAFF John R. Gillison, Assistant City Manager Linda D. Daniels, Deputy City Manager William Wittkopf, Public Works Director Ingrid Y. Bruce, GIS/Special Districts Manager Christopher Bopko, Management Analyst III P255 TABLE OF CONTENTS ENGINEER'S LETTER INTRODUCTION 1 3 Reason for Assessment .............................................................................................3 Process for Annual Assessment .................................................................................3 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS 5 Description of the Boundaries of the District ...............................................................5 Description of Improvements and Services ................................................................5 Map of Improvements .................................................................................................9 ESTIMATE OF COSTS 10 District Budget ..........................................................................................................10 Definitions of Budget Items .......................................................................................11 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT 13 General .....................................................................................................................13 Special Benefit .........................................................................................................13 General Benefit ........................................................................................................14 Method of Assessment Spread ................................................................................14 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM ASSESSMENT ROLL 16 17 Assessment Roll .......................................................................................................17 Annexations ..............................................................................................................17 P256 ENGINEER'S LETTER WHEREAS, on July 6`", 2011, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 (the "1972 Act") adopted its Resolution No. 11-098, a Resolution Initiating Proceedings for the Levy of Annual Assessments for Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 (North Etiwanda) (the "District"); and WHEREAS, the Resolution Initiating Proceedings directed staff to prepare and file an Engineer's Report for Fiscal Year 2011112 pursuant to the requirements of the 1972 Act. The Engineer's Report presents the plans and specifications describing the general nature, location and extent of the improvements to be maintained, an estimate of the costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements for the District for the referenced fiscal year, a diagram for the District, showing the area and properties proposed to be assessed, and an assessment of the estimated costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing the improvements, assessing the net amount upon all assessable lots and/or parcels within the District in proportion to the special benefit received; and NOW THEREFORE, the following assessment is proposed to be authorized in order to pay the estimated costs of maintenance, operation and servicing of the improvements to be paid by the assessable real property within the boundaries of the District in proportion to the special benefit received. The following table summarizes the proposed assessment. SUMMARY OF ASSESSMENT Fiscal Year 2011112 Total Estimated Assessment $641,620.00 Less Anticipated Delinquencies 39 480.00 Total Estimated Revenue $602,140.00 Plus Reserve Fund Contribution 137 490.00 Total Expenditure Budget $939,630.00 Total District EBU Count 2,741.00 Actual Assessment per EBU $307.05 Maximum Allowable Assessment per EBU $307.05 In making the assessments contained herein pursuant to the 1972 Act: I have identified all parcels which will have a special benefit conferred upon them from the improvements described in the Special Benefit Section of this Engineer's Report (the "Specially Benefited Parcels"). For particulars as to the identification of said parcels, reference is made to the Assessment Diagram, a copy of which is included in this Engineer's Report. 2. I have evaluated the costs and expenses of the improvements upon the Specially Benefited Parcels. In making such evaluation: Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2011112 P257 a. The proportionate special benefit derived by each Specially Benefited Parcel from the improvements was determined in relationship to the entirety of the maintenance costs of the improvements; b. No assessment has been imposed on any Specially Benefited Parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on such parcel from the improvements; and c. Any general benefits from the improvements have been separated from the special benefits and only special benefits have been assessed. I, the undersigned, respectfully submit the enclosed Engineer's Report and, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, the Engineer's Report, Assessments, and the Assessment Diagram herein have been prepared and computed in accordance with the order of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Assessment Law. Mark A. Steuer, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2011/12 P258 INTRODUCTION Reason for Assessment Approval of the assessment covered by this Engineer's Report will generate the revenue necessary to: Provide for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements described in this Engineer's Report. Maintenance may include but is not limited to, all of the following: the repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement, providing for the life, growth, health and beauty of the landscaping, including cultivation, irrigation, trimming, spraying, fertilizing or treating for disease or injury, the removal of trimming, rubbish, debris and other solid waste, the maintenance, repair and replacement as necessary of all irrigation systems and the removal of graffiti from walls immediately adjacent to the cultivated areas. Servicing means the furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operating and servicing of any improvement. Servicing shall also include vehicle, equipment, capital improvements and administrative costs associated with the annual administration and operation of the District. Process for Annual Assessment The City cannot levy and collect annual assessments within the District without complying with the procedures specified in the 1972 Act. On an annual basis, an Engineer's Report must be prepared which contains a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the district. The City Council must also adopt a resolution of intention which: • Declares the intention of the City Council to levy and collect assessments within the assessment district for the fscal year stated therein. • Generally describes the existing and proposed improvements and any substantial changes proposed to be made in existing improvements. • Refers to the assessment district by its distinctive designation and indicate the general location of the district. • Refers to the report of the engineer, on file with the clerk, for a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the district. • Gives notice of the time and place for public hearing by the City Council on the levy of the proposed assessment. • States whether the assessment is proposed to increase from the previous year. If the assessments are to be levied in the same or lesser amounts than the maximum assessment amount approved, the clerk shall give notice by causing the resolution of intention to be published. Any interested person may, prior to the conclusion of the public hearing, file a written protest which shall state all grounds of objection. The protest shall contain a description sufficient to identify the property owned by the property owner filing the protest. During the course or upon conclusion of the hearing, the City Council may order changes in any of the matters provided in the report, including changes in the improvements, any zones within the assessment district, and the proposed diagram or the proposed assessment. The City Council, upon conclusion of the public hearing must then adopt a resolution confirming the diagram and assessment, either as originally proposed or as changed by it. The adoption of the resolution shall constitute the levy of an assessment for the fiscal year referred to in the assessment. Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2011 /12 P259 If the assessment to be levied exceeds the maximum assessment amount previously approved, the City must comply with the procedures specified in Article XIIID and Proposition 218. The voters in the State of California in November 1996 added Article XIIID to the California Constitution imposing, among other requirements, the necessity for the City to conduct an assessment ballot procedure to enable the owners of each property on which assessments are proposed to be enacted or increased, the opportunity to express their support for, or opposition to the proposed assessment or increase in such assessment. The basic steps of the assessment ballot procedure are outlined below. The City must prepare a Notice of Public Hearing ("Notice'), which describes, along with other mandated information, the reason for the proposed assessments, and to provide a date and time of a public hearing to be held on the matter. The City must also prepare an assessment ballot, which clearly gives the property owner the ability to sign and mark their assessment ballot either in favor of, or in opposition to the proposed assessment. The Notice and assessment ballot are mailed to each affected property owner within the District a minimum of 45 days prior to the public hearing date as shown in the Notice. The City may also hold community meetings with the property owners to discuss the issues facing the District and to answer property owner questions directly. After the Notice and assessment ballot are mailed, property owners are given until the close of the public hearing, stated in the Notice, to return their signed and marked assessment ballot. During the public hearing, property owners are given the opportunity to address the City Council and ask questions or voice their concerns. At the public hearing, the returned assessment ballots received prior to the close of the public hearing are tabulated, weighted by the proposed assessment amount on each property and the results are announced by the City Council. Article XIIID provides that if, as a result of the assessment ballot proceeding, a majority protest is found to exist, the City Council shall not have the authority to levy and collect the assessments as proposed. A majority protest exists if the assessments represented by ballots submitted in opposition exceed those submitted in favor of the assessment. All returned ballots are tabulated and weighted according to the financial.obligation of each particular parcel. If there is no majority protest as described above, the City Council may approve the proposed assessments. If there is a majority protest, as described above, the City will not levy and collect any assessments. Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2011/12 P260 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS The District provides for the administration, maintenance, operations, and. servicing of various improvements located within the public right-of-way and dedicated easements within the boundaries of the District. Description of the Boundaries of the District The District is located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California. The boundaries of the District are generally described as that area of the City known as North Etiwanda, which is generally bounded by the 210 Freeway on the south, I-15 on the west, and City limits on the north. Typically parcels have been annexed to the District as they have developed. Reference is also made to the Assessment Diagram included in this Report. Description of Improvements and Services The improvements are the maintenance and servicing of landscaping sites and appurtenant facilities throughout the District. The various landscaping sites that are maintained consist of parkways, median islands, street trees, paseos and community trails located within street right-of-ways and dedicated public easements which are within the boundaries of the District. The landscaping maintenance includes, but is not limited to, shrubs, turf, tree trimming in irrigated City parkways and paseos, weed and pest control, landscape irrigation systems and testing, trash, debris and graffiti removal, and associated appurtenant facilities. Services include personnel, materials, contracting services, utilities, and all necessary costs associated with the maintenance, replacement and repair required to keep the improvements in a healthy, vigorous and satisfactory condition. In addition, it is the City's intention to continue to use cost effective materials, including the future ability to replace landscaping with drought resistant or low water use plants, in order to lower expenses of the District. The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows: Parks: Etiwanda Creek Park. Site # Descriptive Location EN-1 The North side of Wilson from San Sevaine to Ridgeline: The Eastside of Ridgeline from Wilson to Arcadia, the south side of Arcadia from Ridgeline to 77 feet east of Ridgeline. Ground Cover area: 27,325 square feet Turf area: 19,334 square feet Hardscape area: 840 square feet EN-2 The Metropolitan Water District easement on the south side of Crescents Way from San Marino to Ridgeline. Ground Cover area: 38,104 square feet Turf area: 41,250 square feet Hardscape area: 9,000 square feet EN-3 The Wilson Median from Wardman Bullock to San Sevaine. Ground Cover area: 9,016 square feet Hardscape area: 11, 088 square feet Landscape Maintenance District. No. 7 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2011!12 P261 EN-4 The Planters on the north side of the drainage easement that is between and parallel to Highland and Arapaho east of Etiwanda Ave. Ground Cover area: 63,972 square feet EN-5 The south side of Wilson from 1,115 feet west of San Sevaine to 205 feet east of San Sevaine. The Landscape east of San Sevaine from 24th to south end tract. Ground Cover area: 45,584 square feet Turf area: 3,527 square feet EN-6 The north side of Wilson from Wardman Bullock to Ridgeline. The west side of Ridgeline from Wilson to 120 feet north of Arcadia. Ground Cover area: 29,226 square feet Turf area: 15,136 square feet Hardscape area: 1,300 square feet EN-7 The parkway on the eastside of Wardman Bullock from 24th street to 857 feet north of Glendora. The cobblestone between the tract wall and the flood wall will be handled as extra for debris pickup and weed control on an as needed basis. Ground Cover area: 10,268 square feet Hardscape area: 31,549 square feet EN-8 The south side of Crescenta Way from Ridgeline to Crestline Ground Cover area: 50,305 square feet Turf area: 35,960 square feet Hardscape area: 10,000 square feet EN-9 The paseo from Meadow Brook to Rock Creek Road. Ground Cover area: 1,400 square feet Turf area: 6,555 square feet Hardscape area: 2,820 square feet EN-10 The paseo from Etiwanda to North Rim Way. The west side of Etiwanda from 175 feet north of North Rim Way to 171 feet south of Golden Prairie Drive. Ground Cover area: 49,020 square feet Turf area: 4,445 square feet Hardscape area: 13,026 square feet EN-11 The paseo south of Ridge Crest Drive to southern boundary of Tract 14139. This site is temporarily maintained by another contractor and was deleted from the contract as of 7- 16-01, however, this site is still the city's property. Ground Cover area: 3,548 square feet Turt area: 800 square feet Hardscape area: 4,280 square feet EN-12 The cul-de-sac on the north side of Ridgecrest at Etiwanda Creek Channel. Ground Cover area: 1,870 square feet Turt area: 700 square feet Hardscape area: 450 square feet EN-13 The east side of San Sevaine from Wilson to 136 feet north of Crescenta. Ground Cover area: 46,611 square feet Turt area: 5,037 square feet EN-14 The west side of San Sevaine from 150' north of Wilson to 136' north of Crescenta. Ground Cover area: 55,166 square feet Turt area: 235 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2011/12 P262 Hardscape area: 6,975 square feet EN-15 The north side of Youngs Canyon Road from 500 feet east of Koch to 692 feet west of Koch. The south side of Youngs Canyon Road from 349 feet east of Koch to 692 feet west of Koch. The east and west side of Koch place from Youngs Canyon Road to 132 feet north of Youngs Canyon Road. The west side of Koch from Youngs Canyon Road to 132 feet south of Youngs Canyon Road. The east side of Koch from 82 feet south of Youngs Canyon Road to Youngs Canyon Road. The trailhead north east of the east end of Youngs Canyon Road to the south end of San Sevaine Horse Trail. The south end of San Sevaine Horse from the trail head to 254 feet north of trailhead. Ground Cover area: 42,925 square feet Hardscape area: 14,308 square feet EN-16 The east side of Wardman Bullock from 225 feet south of San Segundo Drive to 80 feet north of Dona Way. Ground Cover area: 2,056 square feet Hardscape area: 3,450 square feet EN-17 The north side of Colonbero from San Sevaine Channel to Guiders Drive. The south side of Colonbero from San Sevaine Channel to 400 feet north of Guidera Drive. The north side of Aggazzotti from Colonbero to 475 feet east of Colonbero. This site has a pump which will be adjusted and maintained by city personnel. Ground Cover area: 43,241 square feet Hardscape area: 29,125 square feet EN-18 The north side of Aggazzotti Road from San Antonio Drive to San Sevaine Road. The west side of San Sevaine road from Aggazzotti to 702 feet south of Aggazzotti. The East side of San Sevaine Road from 702 feet south of Aggazzotti to Regina. Ground Cover area: 47,823 square feet Hardscape area: 30,986 square feet EN-19 The south side of Wilson from Etiwanda to Estates Way. Ground Cover area: 45,727 square feet Hardscape area: 19,229 square feet EN-20 The east side of Bluegrass from 190 feet south of Vista Verde Dr. to Wilson Avenue. The south side of Wilson Avenue from Bluegrass Avenue to Estates Way Ground Cover area: 85,155 square feet Hardscape area: 48,784 square feet _ EN-21 The north side of Wilson from Etiwanda to Cervantes. The Wilson median from Etiwanda To Cervantes. The Westside of Etiwanda From Wilson To Del Norte Place. Ground Cover area: 88,795 square feet Hardscape area: 27,128 square feet EN-22 The north and south side of Vintage from 165 feet east of Country View to 338 feet west of Country View. Ground Cover area: 13,603 square feet Hardscape area: 7,365 square feet EN-23 The north side of Wilson and median from Etiwanda west to Etiwanda. The eastside of Etiwanda from Wilson to 1150 feet north of Wilson. Ground Cover area: 32,027 square feet Hardscape area: 29,567 square feet EN-24 The north side of Vintage from 360 feet west of Ascot to 230 feet east of Countrywood. Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2011/12 P263 Ground Cover area: 34,707 square feet Hardscape area: 92,600 square feet EN-25 The eastside of Bluegrass from Banyan to 610 feet north of Banyan. Ground Cover area: 4,054 square feet Hardscape area: 5,819 square feet EN-26 The south side of Banyan from Bluegrass to Greenwood. Ground Cover area: 6,240 square feet Hardscape area: 3,200 square feet EN-27 The south side of Banyan from Laurel Blossom to Etiwanda. Ground Cover area: 1,703 square feet Hardscape area: 8,417 square feet EN-28 The north side of Wilson from Cervantes to 1715 feet west of Cervantes. The west side of Cervantes from Carmel Knolls Drive to Wilson. The paseo from Wilson to Tejas Ct. The median on Wilson from Cervantes to Bluegrass. The following temporary landscape: There is 1 planter on the west side of Altura at Tejas. There are five planters on the south side of Tejas from Altura to 195 feet east of Altura. Ground Cover area: 25,048 square feet Hardscape area: 22,532 square feet EN-29 The south side of Banyan from 787 feet west of East Av. to East Av...The west side of East Avenue from Banyan to 600 feet south of Blue Gum. The east side of East Ave. from Banyan to 537 feet south of Banyan. Ground cover area: 16,111 square feet Hardscape area: 15,774 square feet EN-30 The east side of Bluegrass Ave from 257 feet south of Churchill Drive to 418 feet north of Churchill Drive. Ground Cover area: 9,303 square feet Hardscape area: 5,302 square feet EN-31 The south side of Banyan Ave. from 375 feet south of Cashew Way to Rose Way. The north side of Banyan Ave. from 435 feet west of Peak PI. to Wardman Bullock Rd. Ground cover area: 53,000 square feet Hardscape area: 26,855 square feet EN-32 The landscaping south of the equestrian trail from 210 feet west of Grovewood PI. to 1,170 feet east of Grovewood PI. Ground cover area: 6,900 square feet EN-33 The north side of Youngs Canyon Rd. from 600 feet east of Banyan Ave. to Banyan Ave. The east side of Wardman Bullock Rd. from Banyan Ave. to Wilson Ave. The south side of Wilson Ave. from Wardman Bullock Rd. to 635 feet east of Fields PI. Ground cover area: 66,601 square feet Hardscape area: 46,332 square feet EN-34 The west side of Wardman Bullock Rd. from Wilson Ave. to Banyan Ave. Parkview Way from Wardman Bullock Rd. to Soledad Way. Ground cover area: 56,314 square feet Hardscape area: 28,428 square feet EN-35 The north side of Day Creek Blvd. from Etiwanda Ave. to Indian Wells Place. Ground cover area: 160,737 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2011 /12 P264 Hardscape area: 128,254 square feet EN-36 The south side of Day Creek from 380 feet north of Coyote to Etiwanda. The west side of Etiwanda from Day Creek to 170 feet north of North Rim. The hydro seeded landscape area inside the catch basin on the corner of Day Creek and Etiwanda. The west side of Day Creek from 380 feet north of Coyote to Indian Wells. Ground cover area: 58,398 square feet Hardscape area: 68,127 square feet EN-37 The east side of East Av. from 235 feet south of Hunt Club Dr. to 375 feet north of Hunt Club Dr. Ground cover area, Hardscape: EN-38 The west side of Ea' Ground cover area: Hardscape area: 5,559 square feet 5,231 square feet .t Ave. from 236 feet north of Philly Dr. to 245 feet south of Philly Dr 4,605 square feet 3,394 square feet Ground cover, shrubs and turf areas that make up parkways, median islands and paseos are maintained under contract by a private landscape maintenance company. Parks are maintained by the City's Park Maintenance Crews. Map of Improvements The following page shows the map of landscaping improvements, including irrigation sites and community trails, to be maintained using District funds. Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2011/12 °a 0 z R1 +{ ,' Sys ~, a g w ~ ~ z w a ~ w z z ~ ~ O J O ~ Q J F- Q H W (¢'J F (~9 Y ~ O W U ~ ~ > ~ d ~ d ~ ~ LL d O ^O i I ,~ I ~'I ~ ~ ~ ~ n j I . 0 I Z z I a 1 ~ W I i-' Z ' ~O 1~~i O- `yam I ~ , I I I I`~ o ,u{ ~ l~ ~ z II w w'~ ' 1 ~~' ' ~ d Y 1 L t ~ ~ r I I i , r~•. 1 d' \.~WV la I.I ill 1 - 'o-L~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ' 1 11 . 1 n \ f2 ~L~~ 7 :' : ! _ W i W \ O _ I r lli w 1 n ` r- 'I'll~.` {l I~~ ~ ~ ~ ~'W If ~N N i 2~~ 41- 1 Z ~ ~ ~ ' ~ ~ • ~ ~ Zl ~ -W G 1 ry I 1 T 1 W _~I `A Y { W w 'l4 lT ~ ~ ~ ~ _ S i, i iil tl ~ I ~ Wv x 11 ~~ ~ ',-01 H /~ ~ , ; ' a t I s ~~o~~na NtlwoatlM r~-- { ~; ; „, , ~ i ~ l i I W ~ ~ ~ i W I `'~ i I I W ~' ~ ~ 1 ~ I ~ ~ ~ -- I . i a° ,3 I ' I ~~ f - ~ ~ I ~ ~ ..-. ~ 'I i _. I I .. _ ^` {{i ' I i ~ ~ I I I + ~ I I i _ l ~ I ~ :, I I I: i O ~ n z - W Z II L - 2 Z I ' w a O m :I _ + ,,i I I I ~ N I, , ~ ~~ ~I I ~ ( ~ ~ w ~ I ~ Q I ~ I. ~ I j ~ , ICI ~ ~ I II ~ i f,, i•,',I tl j V I , ;~ \ i I „ i ;,. N I I , li fi ~ ~` ~ ~ ~~, I I ~ I ~ ~,i I i i~L I I ` w ,J I~ ~ ~ , ntl tlONtlM1131 . _ ~ . lll~ +'r - w Atl tlONVM113 W Atl tlONVM113 u l I I r ~ ~ ~ II, ~;~ I 7 ~I ~ I~IIi ~,~y ICI I, i` I ~~ ~I I i ` i. • w I ~,1 ,~~I I ~ I ~ ~ ~ . I , 4 ,. I rl ~ i 1 ~ I ~ i -1 i; I I J a ,; 4 ~ rr,~ , ~ 1, , 1 I i~l'~ \ ~ I' 1 _ ~ ~ I I I t v l \ ,! ~ ~. I I -~'I 'j n ~ l~ ~: I 11 I I I~ ~ ~~ I ~~ I I I I w i ' ~ ~ ,~ W \, I I ~ ~. '~I~ ~~W 2 ~1Y I l J I II ~~ I 1 . _ ~~ /~f ll I Z ~ ~ ~. T WL 11 .. f W I 1 O N' - N I ~ ~ ~ ' ~ O -• l ! ' ~ ~~. r' ~I . ~ ~ w ,II I P n ,4 ~ ~ ~ ,~ 2 ". r W l , . 1 ~ i I W ~ ~ ,It 'C 1 !;, i~ ., - ~w i!IIi~I II'I I 'II I' _j ' I lllli ~ j- I '~ ~ ~ ( I i~, ll C I ~~ ~IGIIii II'I~ ~, ~ ~ ~I ~.' ' 1' r v~ ~ I , ~ ~~~ l 1Or'(19 N33a0!Add I 1 1 I I I I I I i i 1- . i P ' 4 1 i ! I I `~'~~f ~~ I , , I j ~ I .. ~ ll 'yyll I~'I{~ tl`I~I;, IiII~; I ~ ~ i fli!:I°`I~o v i ~~ ~ r I r l I .I. I `t 1. ~ i ~I I l'.'J t - ~ _n ~ q ~'1 1 I'i o ~ ~ o „ N1 J. ~ ~U ' U I i I I it j cN r~ I III. i l i J ~ '~ O 1.t ! Ijl l IlJill ~,Ii ~ jl l I i;i j o I > ;. ~ ,d 1Stl31 p'. I ~~ !I II .2 N ! I '¢ I' = (~ I~ I it =. I I ~ I II o c. 'I Io I~ l ,lu iI I I'~ I i li III II' JI I'j ' ('L.~I~ ,rl 11 , II Irlll ~ >A I `I I I .!IIr I ,,, ~ I~r-„ r '" I I tl 1 11 ~ I I {I ~ Ii; I ll, ~1 1 A I .:N - 1 ,. , . . . P266 ESTIMATE OF COSTS The estimated costs of administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing the improvements as described in the Plans and Specifications are summarized below. Each year, as part of the assessment district levy calculation process, the costs and expenses are reviewed and the annual costs are projected for the following fiscal year. District Budget Estimated 2011/72 Bud et Personnel Services Re ular Salaries $167,800.00 Part-time Salaries 10,380.00 Frin a Benefts ~ 79 770.00 Subtotal Personnel $257,950.00 O erations and Maintenance O erations and Maintenance $46,660.00 O erations and Maintenance Facilities 1,000.00 Vehicle O erations and Maintenance 2,500.00 Contract Services 300,180.00 Tree Maintenance 6,950.00 Utilities Tele hone Utilities 1,300.00 Water Utilities 221,610.00 Electric Utilities 23,840.00 Assessment Administration 15,080.00 General Overhead 58 710.00 Subtotal O erations and Maintenance $677,830.00 Ca ital Ex enditures Ca ital Pro'ects 3 850.00 Subtotal Ca ital Ex enditures $3,850.00 Total District Ex enditure Bud et $939,630.00 Total Estimated Assessment $841,620.00 Less Anticipated Delinquencies 39 480.00 Total Estimated Revenue $802,140.00 Plus Operating Reserve Fund Contribution 137 490.00 Total Expenditure Budget $939,630.00 Total Estimated Assessment $841,620.00 Total District EBU Count ~ 2,741.00 Actual Assessment er EBU -Fiscal Year 2011/12 $307.05 Maximum Allowable Assessment er EBU -Fiscal Year 2011/12 $307.05 The maximum allowable assessment per EBU listed in the District budget above, is the amount which was approved in 1996/97 and subsequent District annexations. Each year, prior to the assessments being placed on the tax roll, the City will review the budget and determine the amount needed to Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 10 Fiscal Year 2011/12 P267 maintain the improvements for the upcoming fiscal year. The actual assessment per EBU will be based on the estimated costs of maintenance, available fund balance and maximum allowable assessment with the goal of maintaining the improvements in a satisfactory and healthy condition. The actual assessment amount may be lower than the maximum allowable assessment; however it may not exceed the maximum unless the increase is approved by the property owners in accordance with Proposition 218. It is the intent of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to maintain an Operating Reserve which shall not exceed the estimated costs of maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or when the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The reserve balance information for the District is as follows: Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2011 Reserve Fund Balance $914,640.00 Operating Reserve Contribution -Fiscal Year 2011112 (137,490.00) Operalina Reserve Collection -Fiscal Year 2011/12 D.00 Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2012 Reserve Fund Balance $777,150.00 Definitions of Budget Items The following definitions describe the costs and expenses included in the District Budget: Personnel Services Regular Salaries: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all full-time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Part Time Salaries: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all part time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Frinoe Benefits: This item includes the benefits available to City employees: health care, vacation, sick time, and retirement fund. Operations and Maintenance Contract Services: This item includes the contract costs of a landscape maintenance company responsible for the ongoing maintenance of the District improvements. Tree Maintenance: This item includes the contract costs attributed to maintaining the street trees and other trees throughout the District. Utilities -Water: This item includes the costs to furnish water for the landscaping within the District. Utilities -Electric: This item includes the costs to furnish electricity required for the operation and maintenance of the sprinklers and irrigation controllers. Assessment Administration: This item includes the cost to all particular departments and staff of the City, and consultants for providing the administration, coordination and management of District services, operations, and incidental expenses related to the District. This item also includes creation of an annual engineer's report, resolutions and placing the assessment amounts onto the County tax roll each year, along with responding to any public inquiries and future Proposition 218 balloting proceedings. Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 11 Fiscal Year 2011 /12 P268 General Overhead: This item includes the costs of all departments and staff of the City for providing the coordination of District services, inspections, annual bid management, responding to public concerns, public education, accounting, auditing and procedural matters associated with the District. This item also includes an allocation for general City staff time for administrative functions and systems that provide for a functional and operational assessment district within the City's administrative structure. Capital Expenditures: Capital Projects: This item includes new improvements to further enhance the level and quality of service provided within the boundaries of the District. This may include new monuments, irrigation systems, and other large improvements. Operating Reserve Collection: Operating Reserve Collection: This item includes the amount to be collected to maintain reserves to enable the City to pay for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or whenever the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The Reserve Fund contribution will continue until such a time the Reserve Fund balance is approximately one half of the annual costs. The fund may be allowed to accumulate in anticipation of any unforeseen expenses not included in the yearly maintenance costs. This may include, but is not limited to, tree replacements, repair of damaged equipment due to vandalism, storms and other similar events. Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 12 Fiscal Year 2011/12 P269 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT General Pursuant to the 1972 Act and Article XIIID, all parcels that have a special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvemehts and services shall be identified, and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel shall be determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of improvements. The 1972 Act, permits the establishment of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include the operation, maintenance and servicing of landscaping improvements. Section 22573 of the 1972 Act requires that maintenance assessments must be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. This Section states: "The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district maybe apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements." The determination of whether or not a lot or parcel will benefit from the improvements shall be made pursuant to the Improvement Act of 1911 (Division 7 (commencing with Section 5000) (of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California]." The 1972 Act also permits the designation of zones of benefit within any individual assessment district if "by reasons or variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive different degrees of benefit from the improvement" (Sec. 22547). Article XIIID, Section 4(a) of the California Constitution limits the amount of any assessment to the proportional special benefit conferred on the property. Article XIIID also provides that publicly owned properties must be assessed unless there is clear and convincing evidence that those properties receive no special benefit from the assessment. Exempted from the assessment would be the areas of public streets, public avenues, public lanes, public roads, public drives, public courts, public alleys, public easements and rights-of-ways, public greenbelts and public parkways. The net amount to be assessed may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels. Proposition 218, approved by the voters in November 1996, requires the City to separate general benefit from special benefit, where only special benefit is assessed. Benefit The maintenance and servicing of the improvements within the District (which are described in the Description of Services and Improvements Section of this report) are for the benefit of the properties within the District, and as such confer a special and direct benefit to parcels within the District by: • improving the livability, appearance, and desirability for properties within the boundaries of the District, and • ensuring that improvements do not reach a state of deterioration or disrepair so as to be materially detrimental to properties within the District, and Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 13 Fiscal Year 2011/12 P270 • providing beautification, shade and overall enhancement to properties within the District. The above mentioned items affect the assessed property in a way that is particular and distinct from their effect on other parcels and that real property in general and the public at large do not share. They contribute to a specific enhancement of the properties within the District. Since these improvements, including the community trails, were installed and are maintained specifically for the properties within the District; only properties within the District receive a special benefit and are assessed for said maintenance. General Benefit In addition to the special benefits received by parcels within the District, there are derivative general benefits that are conferred on parcels outside the boundaries of the District which include: • the control of dust and insect infestations, and • the visual enhancement of the area to persons or vehicles that may travel through the District. However it has been determined that these benefits are derivative and do not provide a direct benefit to parcels outside of the district that are not being assessed. Method of Assessment Each of the parcels within the District is deemed to receive special benefit from the improvements. Each parcel that has a special benefit conferred upon it as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements are identified and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel is determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of the improvements. When the District was formed in 1989, Article XIIID and Proposition 218 had not yet been passed. Upon the passage of Article XIIID and the subsequent passage of the Proposition Omnibus Implementation Act, new rules were put into place. Due to the changes in legal requirements, as property annexed to the District after the passage of the Assessment Law, the description of the method of assessment became more refined, however, the assessment per parcel has remained the same since the 1996/97 Fiscal Year. Further, no parcel included in the District formation or annexations prior to when the language was refined, are now being levied differently than they were at the time the District was formed or the parcels were annexed. To assess special benefit appropriately, it is necessary to relate the different type of parcel improvements to each other. The Equivalent Benefit Unit ("EBU") method of apportionment uses the single family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single family home equals one Equivalent Benefit Unit (EBU). Every other land-use is converted to EBUs based on an assessment formula that equates to the property's specific development status, type of development (land-use), and size of the property, as compared to a single family home. Vacant parcels are assigned an EBU value of 0.25 per acre because they receive a lesser benefit from the improvements until such.time as development occurs. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land-use types, as assigned by County use code, to determine each parcel's EBU assignment. Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 14 Fiscal Year 2011/12 P271 Land-Use Equivalent Dwelling Units Pro ert T e Count Use Code EBU Value Multi lier Single Family Residential 1.00 Dwelling Unit The use of the latest County Assessor's Secured Roll shall be the basis for the Property Type determination and units/acreage assignments, unless better data is available to the City. In addition, if any parcel within the District is identified by the County AuditorlController to be an invalid parcel number for the current fiscal year, the Property Type and EBU assignment shall be based on the correct parcel number and/or new parcel number(s) County use code and subsequent property information. If a single parcel has changed to multiple parcels, the EBU assignment and assessment amount applied to each of the new parcels will be recalculated rather than spread the proportionate share of the original assessment. The following table summarizes the Fiscal Year 2011/12 maximum allowable assessment rates for the District: Maximum Allowable Property Type (County Assessment Rate Actual Assessment Total Total Use Code) er EBU Rate per EBU UnitslAcres EBUs Single Family Residential $307.05 $307.05 2,741 2,741 The total amount of maintenance and incidental costs for maintaining the landscaping and community trail improvements is assessed to the individual parcels of real property within the District in proportion to the special benefit received by such parcels of real property. The proposed individual assessments are shown on the assessment roll in this report. Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 15 Fiscal Year 2011/12 P272 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM An Assessment Diagram for the District is shown on the following page. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the County Assessor of the County San Bernardino, at the time this report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Engineer's Report. Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 16 Fiscal Year 2011/12 P273 ~ °' y.+ ~ ~ V E .y ¢ ~, o O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ w ny tiJay~ ~ y ~ ~ ~ C ~ J ~ r ,°, ~ N C J [L ~ O ~Fd ~ L_ 3 m ~ ~ __- - •_ _.. ~.L.-. a._.._.._ i nH 3se3 in ® i i t ~ _..~. ~ Q " ~ ny epueM!l3 ~ ,- ~ ~~ i V ~] i y ~ ~-i~i~;- i ..-.._.._.._..1 i i4 nyJa;sayooa !------ ---~---- ~- - - _ i ny Ja;sayooa ~ ~~..~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~~ _' i --~-- -- d ~.II W ~._.._.._.._.._. Ji ,: _ i i ! i ! ~ ~~ I i n uane ! - --I _ J~-i-i d H i I-------I-- I r my uaneH i i - -- - -- ~I -- --~-i n H ny esowJaH i---- I------ y esowJa i ~ I ! i nV PIe9!4oJb' ~-- -~---- -~----- - i-- ;nb' PIeQ!4aJH ny uewllaH i - - ------ ~ ~,t•'~"• N ny uewllaH i w i ~ /' ~ ~ ny p e~au!n 1 i iS ue!iawe~ i - ~-~-- - ---- --- \ ! i i II y - JJJ\ i ~tl .3 ; a: t..-..~ .•J ~ '~..-:-•Y..-..-~~ - -r ny anOJ~ a~¢E§~$F$$an • L-..-..-..~..~ N O €~5¢4 gOB ~ m LL EEs~g~j sg'geCds `F ~ T i39 a"a EfiE~S'~p 'O C N EO - 66~g"=~eEs€aE m - &~a 44{~EyE~aE€ F4d 5P ep EFaad 5_E~F gs F s~ ga 5~e°aeast~~`5 E ~- C7 dadc~?#es's€t P274 ASSESSMENT ROLL Assessment Roll The assessment roll is a listing of the assessment for Fiscal Year 2011/12 apportioned to each lot or parcel, as shown on the last equalized roll of the Assessor of the County of San Bernardino. The following tables summarize the Fiscal Year 2011/12 maximum and actual assessments for the District: Maximum Allowable Maximum Property Type (County Assessment Rate Total Total Allowable Use Code er EBU Units/Acres EBUs Assessment Single Family Residential $307.05 2,741 2,741 $841,624.05 Actual Property Type (County Assessment Rate Total Total Actual Use Code er EBU Units/Acres EBUs Assessment Single Family Residential $307.05 2,741 2,741 $841,624.05 A copy of the full assessment roll is available for review in the City Clerk's office. Annexations There were no annexations effective for the 2011/12 Fiscal Year: Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 17 Fiscal Year 2011/12 P275 Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2011/2012 City of Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 (South Etiwanda) P276 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 8 (SOUTH ETIWANDA) 10500 Civic Center Drive _ Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Phone: 909.477.2740 Fax: 909.477.2741 CITY COUNCIL L. Dennis Michael, Mayor Sam Spagnolo, Mayor Pro Tem William Alexander, Council Member Chuck Buquet, Council Member Diane Williams, Council Member CITY STAFF John R. Gillison, Assistant City Manager Linda D. Daniels, Deputy City Manager William Wittkopf, Public Works Director Ingrid Y. Bruce, GIS/Special Districts Manager Christopher Bopko, Management Analyst III P277 TABLE OF CONTENTS ENGINEER'S LETTER 1 INTRODUCTION 3 Reason for Assessment ................:............................................................................3 Process for Annual Assessment .................................................................................3 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS 5 Description of the Boundaries of the District ...............................................................5 Description of Improvements and Services ................................................................5 Map of Improvements .................................................................................................6 ESTIMATE OF COSTS ~ District Budget ............................................................................................................7 Definitions of Budget Items .........................................................................................8 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT 10 General .......................................................................................:...............:.............10 Special Benefit .........................................................................................................10 General Benefit ........................................................................................................11 Method of Assessment Spread ................................................................................11 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM ASSESSMENT ROLL 13 14 Assessment Roll .......................................................................................................14 Annexations ..............................................................................................................14 P278 ENGINEER'S LETTER WHEREAS, on July 6`h, 2011, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga (the "City'), under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 (the "1972 Act") adopted its Resolution No. 11- 098, aResolution Initiating Proceedings for the Levy of Annual Assessments for Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 (South Etiwanda); and WHEREAS, the Resolution Initiating Proceedings directed staff to prepare and file an Engineer's Report for Fiscal Year 2011/12 pursuant to the requirements of the 1972 Act. The Engineer's Report presents the plans and specifications describing the general nature, location and extent of the improvements to be maintained, an estimate of the costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements for the District for the referenced fiscal year, a diagram for the District, showing the area and properties proposed to be assessed, and an assessment of the estimated costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing the improvements, assessing the net amount upon all assessable lots and/or parcels within the District in proportion to the special benefit received; and NOW THEREFORE, the following assessment is proposed to be authorized in order to pay the estimated costs of maintenance, operation and servicing of the improvements to be paid by the assessable real property within the boundaries of the District in proportion to the special benefit received. The following table summarizes the proposed assessment. - SUMMARY OF ASSESSMENT Fiscal Year 2011112 Total Estimated Assessment $28,620.00 Less Anticipated Delinquency Penalty 2 590.00 Total Estimated Revenue $26,030.00 Less Reserve Fund Contribution 0.00 Total Expenditure Budget $26,030.00 Total District EBU Count 189.00 Actual Assessment per EBU $151.45 Maximum Allowable Assessment per EBU $151.45 In making the assessments contained herein pursuant to the 1972 Act: I have identified all parcels which will have a special benefit conferred upon them from the improvements described in the Special Benefit Section of this Engineer's Report (the "Specially Benefited Parcels"). For particulars as to the identification of said parcels, reference is made to the Assessment Diagram, a copy of which is included in this Engineer's Report. 2. 1 have evaluated the costs and expenses of the improvements upon the Specially Benefited Parcels. In making such evaluation: a. The proportionate special benefit derived by each Specially Benefited Parcel from the improvements was determined in relationship to the entirety of the maintenance costs of the improvements; Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2011 /12 P279 b. No assessment has been imposed on any Specially Benefited Parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on such parcel from the improvements; and c. Any general benefits from the improvements have been separated from the special benefits and only special benefits have been assessed. I, the undersigned, respectfully submit the enclosed Engineer's Report and, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, the Engineer's Report, Assessments, and the Assessment Diagram herein have been prepared and computed in accordance with the order of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the 1972 Act, Article XIII D of the Constitution of the State of California ("Article XIII D") and the Proposition 218 Omnibus Implementation Act ("Proposition 218"), (the 1972 Act, Article XIII D and Proposition 218 are collectively referred to as the "Assessment Law"). Mark A. Steuer, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2011/12 P280 INTRODUCTION Reason for Assessment Approval of the assessment covered by this Engineer's Report will generate the revenue necessary to: Provide for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements described in this Engineer's Report. Maintenance may include but is not limited to, all of the following: the repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement, providing for the life, growth, health and beauty of the landscaping, including cultivation, irrigation, trimming, spraying, fertilizing or treating for disease or injury, the removal of trimming, rubbish, debris and other solid waste, the maintenance, repair and replacement as necessary of all irrigation systems and the removal of graffiti from walls immediately adjacent to the cultivated areas. Servicing means the furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operating and servicing of any improvement. Servicing shall also include vehicle, equipment, capital improvements and administrative costs associated with the annual administration and operation of the District. Process for Annual Assessment The City cannot levy and collect annual assessments within the District without complying with the procedures specified in the 1972 Act. On an annual basis, an Engineer's Report must be prepared which contains a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the district. The City Council must also adopt a resolution of intention which: • Declares the intention of the City Council to levy and collect assessments within the assessment district for the fiscal year stated therein. • Generally describes the existing and proposed improvements and any substantial changes proposed to be made in existing improvements. • Refers to the assessment district by its distinctive designation and indicate the general location of the district. • Refers to the report of the engineer, on file with the clerk, for a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the district. • Gives notice of the time and place for public hearing by the City Council on the levy of the proposed assessment. • States whether the assessment is proposed to increase from the previous year. If the assessments are to be levied in the same or lesser amounts than the maximum assessment amount approved, the clerk shall give notice by causing the resolution of intention to be published. Any interested person may, prior to the conclusion of the public hearing, file a written protest which shall state all grounds of objection. The protest shall contain a description sufficient to identify the property owned by the property owner filing the protest. During the course or upon conclusion of the hearing, the City Council may order changes in any of the matters provided in the report, including changes in the improvements, any zones within the assessment district, and the proposed diagram or the proposed assessment. Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2011/12 P281 The City Council, upon conclusion of the public hearing must then adopt a resolution confirming the diagram and assessment, either as originally proposed or as changed by it. The adoption of the resolution shall constitute the levy of an assessment for the fiscal year referred to in the assessment. If the assessment to be levied exceeds the maximum assessment amount previously approved, the City must comply with the procedures specified in Article XIII D and Proposition 218. The voters in the State of California in November 1996 added Article XIII D to the California Constitution imposing, among other requirements, the necessity for the City to conduct an assessment ballot procedure to enable the owners of each property on which assessments are proposed to be enacted or increased, the opportunity to express their support for, or opposition to the proposed assessment or increase in such assessment. The basic steps of the assessment ballot procedure are outlined below. The City must prepare a Notice of Public Hearing ("Notice'), which describes, along with other mandated information, the reason for the proposed assessments, and to provide a date and time of a public hearing to be held on the matter. The City must also prepare an assessment ballot, which clearly gives the property owner the ability to sign and mark their assessment ballot either in favor of, or in opposition to the proposed assessment. The Notice and assessment ballot are mailed to each affected property owner within the District a minimum of 45 days prior to the public hearing date as shown in the Notice. The City may also hold community meetings with the property owners to discuss the issues facing the District and to answer property owner questions directly. After the Notice and assessment ballot are mailed, property owners are given until the close of the public hearing, stated in the Notice, to return their signed and marked assessment ballot. During the public hearing, property owners are given the opportunity to address the City Council and ask questions or voice their concerns. At the public hearing, the returned assessment ballots received prior to the close of the public hearing are tabulated, weighted by the proposed assessment amount on each property and the results are announced by the City Council. Article XIII D provides that if, as a result of the assessment ballot proceeding, a majority protest is found to exist, the City Council shall not have the authority to levy and collect the assessments as proposed. A majority protest exists if the assessments represented by ballots submitted in opposition exceed those submitted in favor of the assessment. All returned ballots are tabulated and weighted according to the financial obligation of each particular parcel. If there is no majority protest as described above, the City Council may approve the proposed assessments. If there is a majority protest, as described above, the City will not levy and collect any assessments. Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 4 Fiscal Year 2011/12 P282 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS The District provides for the administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing of various improvements located within the public right-of-way and dedicated easements within the bouhdaries of the District. Description of the Boundaries of the District The District is located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California. The boundaries of the District are generally described as that area known as South Etiwanda, which is south of the I-210 Freeway along Fisher Drive, east of East Avenue, including the south side of Highstone Manor Court, the south side of Smokestone Street, and to the San Bernardino County Flood Control drainage basin on east side. Typically parcels have been annexed to the District as they have developed. Reference is also made to the Assessment Diagram included in this Report. Description of Improvements and Services The improvements are the maintenance and servicing of landscaping sites and appurtenant facilities throughout the District. The various landscaping sites that are maintained consist of parkways, median islands, street trees, paseos and community trails located within street right-of-ways and dedicated public easements which are within the boundaries of the District. The landscaping maintenance includes, but is not limited to, shrubs, turf, tree trimming in irrigated City parkways and paseos, weed and pest control, landscape irrigation systems and testing, trash, debris and graffiti removal, and associated appurtenant facilities. Services include personnel, materials, contracting services, utilities, and all necessary costs associated with the maintenance, replacement and repair required to keep the improvements in a healthy, vigorous and satisfactory condition. In addition, it is the City's intention to continue to use cost effective materials, including the future ability to replace landscaping with drought resistant or low water use plants, in order to lower expenses of the District. The breakdown of maintained areas.is as follows: Site # Descriptive Location SE-1 The east side of East Ave. from 480 feet south of Catalpa St. to 182 feet north of Catalpa St. The north and south side of Catalpa St. from East Ave. to Brownstone PI. Ground Cover area: 10,355 square feet Turf area: 6,258 square feet Hardscape area: 4,050 square feet SE-2 The south side of Fisher Dr. from 361 feet east of East Ave. to 210 feet east of Starstone PI. Ground Cover area: 9,366 square feet Hardscape area: 4,074 square feet SE-3 The south side of Fisher Dr. from 860 feet west of Mulberry St. to Mulberry St Ground Cover area: 3,676 square feet Hardscape area: 6,910 square feet Total Ground Cover: 23,397 square feet Total Turf: 6,258 square feet Total Hardscape: 15,034 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Prepared by NBS -Fiscal Year 2011/12 P283 Ground cover, shrubs and turt areas that make up parkways, median islands and paseos are maintained under contract by a private landscape maintenance company. Parks are maintained by the City's Park Maintenance Crews Map of Improvements The following page shows the map of landscaping improvements, including irrigation sites and community trails, to be maintained using District funds. Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 6 Prepared by NBS -Fiscal Year 2011/12 a w F- ~ z W ~- ~ ~ W ~ Z Z c ~ ~ O ~ O o N Q J I- ~ m W ~ ~ C¢.7 Y 00 O W U H F- ~ O ~ W ~ ~ d ~ d ~ ~ ~ d 1 ~ 00 ~ I® I ~I 00 Yr V w y V C r.. .C d V a J a~ N O 0 ~ ~i , ~ ~: N ~ li O H ~ N , ~ i i Q K ~ O , ~ ~-, ~ i U ~ ~ , ~ N ~ ~ I I, , ~ O ' i ~ j i ~ _sa--g o.o ~e ~f;s ~& ~EEEq •eEmiSe -~E€ _ _m `ab~~ 0~u"e-` qEc_°o _°a £_Epm °S 08`0 v3 olcn8 Ep S°ti°°°`e E.~ ° b0 ~ 050_E80_ _ ° n.q= ~L m c30Ea2= ~~ a _ mE^~ a-e i i '-~ ''dos&~ _ -- I i gyosee<<ao;E's"~Ea~ e==~~£ rES n. -€a €m- .E `s~- - -~- r'e P285 ESTIMATE OF COSTS The estimated costs of administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing the improvements as described in the Plans and Specifications are summarized below. Each year, as part of the assessment district levy calculation process, the costs and expenses are reviewed and the annual costs are projected for the following fiscal year. District B Estimated 2011/12 Budget Personnel Services Regular Salaries $1,450.00 Part-time Salaries 0.00 Fringe Benefits 680.00 Subtotal Personnel $2,130.00 Operations and Maintenance Operations and Maintenance $1,000.00 Emergency Equipment and Vehicle Rental 0.00 Contract Services 9,630.00 Tree Maintenance 4,300.00 Utilities Water Utilities 4,920.00 Electric Utilities 890.00 Assessment Administration ~ 1,040.00 General Overhead 2.120.00 Subtotal Operations and Maintenance $23,900.00 Capital Expenditures Capital Projects 0.00 Subtotal Capital Expenditures $0.00 Total District Expenditure Budget $26,030.00 Total Estimated Assessment $28,620.00 Less Anticipated Delinquency Penalty (2 590.010 Total Estimated Revenue $26,030.00 Less Reserve Fund Contribution 0.00 Total Expenditure Budget $26,030.00 Total Estimated Assessment $28,620.00 Total District EBU Count 189.00 Actual Assessment per EBU -Fiscal Year 2011/12 $151.45 Maximum Allowable Assessment er EBU -Fiscal Year 2011/12 $151.45 The maximum allowable assessment per EBU listed in the District budget above, is the amount which was approved in 1989/90, when the District was formed, and subsequent District annexations. Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 7 Prepared by NBS -Fiscal Year 2011/12 . P286 Each year, prior to the assessments being placed on the tax roll, the City will review the budget and determine the amount needed to maintain the improvements for the upcoming fiscal year. The actual assessment per EBU will be based on the estimated costs of maintenance, available fund balance and maximum allowable assessment with the goal of maintaining the improvements in a satisfactory and healthy condition. The actual assessment amount may be lower than the maximum allowable assessment; however it may not exceed the maximum unless the increase is approved by the property owners in accordance with Proposition 218. It is the intent of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to maintain an Operating Reserve which shall not exceed the estimated costs of maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or when the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The reserve balance information for the District is as follows: Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2011 Reserve Fund Balance $46,250.00 Operating Reserve Contribution -Fiscal Year 2011/12 0.00 Operating Reserve Collection -Fiscal Year 2011/12 2.590.00 Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2012 Reserve Fund Balance $50,840.00 Definitions of Budget Items The following definitions describe the costs and expenses included in the District Budget: Operations and Maintenance Contract Services: This item includes the contract costs of a landscape maintenance company responsible for the ongoing maintenance of the District improvements. Tree Maintenance: This item includes the contract costs attributed to maintaining the street trees and other trees throughout the District. Utilities -Water: This item includes the costs to furnish water for the landscaping within the District. Utilities -Electric: This item includes the costs to furnish electricity required for the operation and maintenance of the sprinklers and irrigation controllers. Assessment Administration: This item includes the cost to all particular departments and staff of the City, and consultants for providing the administration, coordination and management of District services, operations, and incidental expenses related to the District. This item also includes creation of an annual engineer's report, resolutions and placing the assessment amounts onto the County tax roll each year, along with responding to any public inquiries and future Proposition 218 balloting proceedings. General Overhead: This item includes the costs of all departments and staff of the City for providing the coordination of District services, inspections, annual bid management, responding to public concerns, public education, accounting, auditing and procedural matters associated with the District. This item also includes an allocation for general City staff time for administrative functions and systems that provide for a functional and operational assessment district within the City's administrative structure. Capital Expenditures: Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Prepared by NBS -Fiscal Year 2011/12 P287 Caoital Projects: This item includes new improvements to further enhance the level and quality of service provided within the boundaries of the District. This may include new monuments, irrigation systems, and other large improvements. Operating Reserve Collection: Operating Reserve Collection: This item includes the amount to be collected to maintain reserves to enable the City to pay for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or whenever the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The Reserve Fund contribution will continue until such a time the Reserve Fund balance is approximately one half of the annual costs. The fund may be allowed to accumulate in anticipation of any unforeseen expenses not included in the yearly maintenance costs. This may include, but is not limited to, tree replacements, repair of damaged equipment due to vandalism, storms and other similar events. Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Prepared by NBS -Fiscal Year 2011/12 P288 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT General Pursuant to the 1972 Act and Article XIII D, all parcels that have a special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements and services shall be identified, and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel shall be determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of improvements. The 1972 Act, permits the establishment of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include the operation, maintenance and servicing of landscaping improvements. Section 22573 of the 1972 Act requires that maintenance assessments must be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. This Section states: "The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district maybe apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements." The determination of whether or not a lot or parcel will benefit from the improvements shall be made pursuant to the Improvement Act of 1911 (Division 7 (commencing with Section 5000) (of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California)." The 1972 Act also permits the designation of zones of benefit within any individual assessment district if "by reasons or variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive different degrees of benefit from the improvement" (Sec. 22547). Article XIII D, Section 4(a) of the California Constitution limits the amount of any assessment to the proportional special benefit conferred on the property. Article XIII D also provides that publicly owned properties must be assessed unless there is clear and convincing evidence that those properties receive no special benefit from the assessment. Exempted from the assessment would be the areas of public streets, public avenues, public lanes, public roads, public drives, public courts, public alleys, public easements and rights-of-ways, public greenbelts and public parkways. The net amount to be assessed may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels. Proposition 218, approved by the voters in November 1996, requires the City to separate general benefit from special benefit, where only special beneft is assessed. Special Benefit - The maintenance and servicing of the improvements within the District (which are described in the Description of Services and Improvements Section of this report) are for the benefit of the properties within the District, and as such confer a special and direct benefit to parcels within the District by: • improving the livability, appearance, and desirability for properties within the boundaries of the District, and • ensuring that improvements do not reach a state of deterioration or disrepair so as to be materially detrimental to properties within the District, and Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 10 Prepared by NBS -Fiscal Year 2011/12 P289 • providing beautification, shade and overall enhancement to properties within the District. The above mentioned items affect the assessed property in a way that is particular and distinct from their effect on other parcels and that real property in general and the public at large do not share. They contribute to a specific enhancement of the properties within the District. Since these improvements, including the community trails, were installed and are maintained specifically for the properties within the District; only properties within the District receive a special benefit and are assessed for said maintenance. General Benefit In addition to the special benefits received by parcels within the District, there are derivative general benefits that are conferred on parcels outside the boundaries of the District which include: the control of dust and insect infestations, and the visual enhancement of the area to persons or vehicles that may travel through the District. However it has been determined that these benefits are derivative and do not provide a direct benefit to parcels outside of the district that are not being assessed. Method of Assessment Each of the parcels within the District is deemed to receive special benefit from the improvements. Each parcel that has a special benefit conferred upon it as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements are identified and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel is determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of the improvements. To assess special benefit appropriately, it is necessary to relate the different type of parcel improvements to each other. The Equivalent Benefit Unit ("EBU") method of apportionment uses the single family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single family home equals one Equivalent Benefit Unit (EBU). Every other land-use is converted to EBUs based on an assessment formula that equates to the property's specific development status, type of development (land-use), and size of the property, as compared to a single family home. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land-use types, as assigned by County use code, to determine each parcel's EBU assignment. Land-Use Equivalent Dwelling Units Pro ert T e Coun Use Code EBU Value Multi tier Single Family Residential 1.00 Dwelling Unit The use of the latest County Assessor's Secured Roll shall be the basis for the Property Type determination and units/acreage assignments, unless better data is available to the City. In addition, if any parcel within the District is identified by the County Auditor/Controller to be an invalid parcel number for the current fiscal year, the Property Type and EBU assignment shall be based on the correct parcel number and/or new parcel number(s) County use code and subsequent property information. If a single parcel has changed to multiple parcels, the EBU assignment and assessment amount applied to each of the new parcels will be recalculated rather than spread the proportionate share of the original assessment. Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 11 Prepared by NBS -Fiscal Year 2011/12 P290 The following table summarizes the Fiscal Year 2011/12 maximum allowable assessment rates for the District: Maximum Allowable Property Type (County Assessment Rate Actual Assessment Total Total Use Code) er EBU Rate per EBU UnitslAcres EBUs Single Family Residential $151.45 $151.45 189.00 189.00 The total amount of maintenance and incidental costs for maintaining the landscaping and community trail improvements is assessed to the individual parcels of real property within the District in proportion to the special benefit received by such parcels of real property. The proposed individual assessments are shown on the assessment roll in this report. Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 12 Prepared by NBS -Fiscal Year 2011/12 P291 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM An Assessment Diagram for the District is shown on the following page. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the County Assessor of the County San Bernardino, at the time this report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Engineer's Report. Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 13 Prepared by NBS -Fiscal Year 2011/12 P292 ~0 °' •1~1 ~ N V ,~ w `IV E r '~ ~ Q O Q . ~ ~, ~ ~ V ~ 1 ir~ C .._.._.._.._ ~ J o i J ~ ~ u~ N 1 -~~ C J CO ~ O w j C ~ m r ° 3 ° '~ 1 I ti ¢` i j - ._.._..:.._..~.._.._.._. ._. ~ i n`d ~se3 in ® 1 z ~ i -- i _~_»_ v ~ Q i ny epuenn!33 (~ o ny epuennp3 ~ ! ~- - /_ i ~~~-~ i ~ i a ~g ~aaJ~ ~eQ ------ - 1 _ ~ ---; - i _ `~I_ ` ~ ~ i C s_.._.._.._.._.._.._..1 I i `) i 1 J ny Ja~sayooa ' -- - --- -- ~ i i ny Jaisayooa ~~ i ~ i ~-- ~-- _, i ny ua~!II!W f._.._.._.._ . (.._ -- -` i ~ ~ --- --- -i ny ua~l!II!W j ! ~ i ~ - ~, ~ e I ny uaneH ~ -- ----- -- - - ---- I ----I- - -~--- - i - my uaneH 1 ! ny esowlaH i - ---- - -- ! ny esowlaH n`d Ple4!yo1V ~ ~ - -- ~nV Ple4!4o1V ny uewllaH i -~ - - - i ~•~" N ny uewllaH '• N ~ i ~ ' ~• t ~ ~ 1 ella ! n i lSue!lawe~ j - ----- ---- -~~ i u y p i !n i'~%~ ~r/'~ ~._i ! ~ ~ SE Ff`E LS€E62 g~9~~.4 t ~a ~~ ~ n`d an01~ ae §p j ~ ~ c m LL -~glrE a=~ P+ ~ ~ C j yS £EE 1 {SEE 6: Y ~ C m [ ~ ~€ S5L~g~gi g` ~ ~fsE € E °so = g LE. S ~ S ~ a~b Eea e~~~~ ° ^ s 3; ~=E€e~ & P .-~ U Eado &E %~ie P293 ASSESSMENT ROLL Assessment Roll The assessment roll is a listing of the assessment for Fiscal Year 2011/12 apportioned to each lot or parcel, as shown on the last equalized roll of the Assessor of the County of San Bernardino. The following tables summarize the Fiscal Year 2011/12 maximum and actual assessments for the District: Maximum Allowable Maximum Property Type (County Assessment Rate Total Total Allowable Use Code er EBU UnitslAcres EBUs Assessment Single Family Residential $151.45 189.00 189.00 $28,624.05 Actual Property Type (County Assessment Rate Total Total Actual Use Code er EBU UnitslAcres EBUs Assessment Single Family Residential $151.45 189.00 189.00 $28,624.05 A copy of the full assessment roll is available for review in the City Clerk's office. Annexations The following annexations are effective for the 2011/12 Fiscal Year: Assessor's Parcel Annexation Total Total Property Type Number Date Pro'ect UnitslAcres EBUs Count Use Code 0227-071-17 6/2/2010 0227-071-17 5.0 1 Church Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 14 Prepared by NBS -Fiscal Year 2011/12 P294 Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2011/2012 City of Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 (Lower Etiwanda) P295 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 9 (LOWER ETIWANDA) 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Phone: 909.477.2740 Fax: 909.477.2741 CITY COUNCIL L. Dennis Michael, Mayor Sam Spagnolo, Mayor Pro Tem William Alexander, Council Member Chuck Buquet, Council Member Diane Williams, Council Member CITY STAFF John R. Gillison, Assistant City Manager Linda D. Daniels, Deputy City Manager William Wittkopf, Public Works Director Ingrid Y. Bruce, GIS/Special Districts Manager Christopher Bopko, Management Analyst III P296 TABLE OF CONTENTS ENGINEER'S LETTER 1 INTRODUCTION 3 Reason for Assessment .............................................................................................3 Process for Annual Assessment .................................................................................3 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS 5 Description of the Boundaries of the District ...............................................................5 Description of Improvements and Services ................................................................5 Map of Improvements ..................:..............................................................................7 ESTIMATE OF COSTS $ District Budget ............................................................................................................8 Definitions of Budget Items .........................................................................................9 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT 11 General .....................................................................................................................11 Special Benefit .........................................................................................................11 General Benefit ........................................................................................................12 Method of Assessment Spread ................................................................................12 Maximum and Historical Assessments .....................................................................13 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM ASSESSMENT ROLL 14 15 Assessment Roll .......................................................................................................15 Annexations ..............................................................................................................15 P297 ENGINEER'S LETTER WHEREAS, on July 6`", 2011, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga (the "City"), under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 (the "1972 Act") adopted its Resolution No. 11- 098, aResolution Initiating Proceedings for the Levy of Annual Assessments for Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 (Lower Etiwanda) (the "District"); and WHEREAS, the Resolution Initiating Proceedings directed staff to prepare and file an Engineer's Report for Fiscal Year 2011112 pursuant to the requirements of the 1972 Act. The Engineer's Report presents the plans and specifications describing the general nature, location and extent of the improvements to be maintained, an estimate of the costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements for the District for the referenced fiscal year, a diagram for the District, showing the area and properties proposed to be assessed, and an assessment of the estimated costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing the improvements, assessing the net amount upon all assessable lots and/or parcels within the District in proportion to the special benefit received; and NOW THEREFORE, the following assessment is proposed to be authorized in order to pay the estimated costs of maintenance, operation and servicing of the improvements to be paid by the assessable real property within the boundaries of the District in proportion to the special benefit received. The following table summarizes the proposed assessment. SUMMARY OF ASSESSMENT Fiscal Year 2011/12 Total Estimated Assessment $379,530.00 Plus Anticipated Delinquency Penalty 970.00 Total Estimated Revenue $380,500.00 Plus Reserve Fund Contribution 317 660.00 Total Expenditure Budget $698,360.00 Total District EBU Count 2,029.56 Actual Assessment per EBU $167.00 Maximum Allowable Assessment per EBU $501.55 In making the assessments contained herein pursuant to the 1972 Act: I have identified all parcels which will have a special benefit conferred upon them from the improvements described in the Special Benefit Section of this Engineer's Report (the "Specially Benefited Parcels"). For particulars as to the identification of said parcels, reference is made to the Assessment Diagram, a copy of which is included in this Engineer's Report. - 2. I have evaluated the costs and expenses of the improvements upon the Specially Benefited Parcels. In making such evaluation: The proportionate special benefit derived by each Specially Benefited Parcel from the improvements was determined in relationship to the entirety of the maintenance costs of the improvements; Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2011 /12 P298 b. No assessment has been imposed on any Specially Benefited Parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on such parcel from the improvements; and c. Any general benefits from the improvements have been separated from the special benefits and only special benefits have been assessed. I, the undersigned, respectfully submit the enclosed Engineer's Report and, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, the Engineer's Report, Assessments, and the Assessment Diagram herein have been prepared and computed in accordance with the order of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the 1972 Act, Article XIII D of the Constitution of the State of California ("Article XIII D") and the Propbsition 218 Omnibus Implementation Act ("Proposition 218"), (the 1972 Act, Article XIII D and Proposition 218 are collectively referred to as the "Assessment Law"). Mark A. Steuer, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2011 /12 P299 INTRODUCTION Reason for Assessment Approval of the assessment covered by this Engineer's Report will generate the revenue necessary to: Provide for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements described in this Engineer's Report. Maintenance may include but is not limited to, all of the following: the repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement, providing for the life, growth, health and beauty of the landscaping, including cultivation, irrigation, trimming, spraying, fertilizing or treating for disease or injury, the removal of trimming, rubbish, debris and other solid waste, the maintenance, repair and replacement as necessary of all irrigation systems and the removal of graffiti from walls immediately adjacent to the cultivated areas. Servicing means the furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operating and servicing of any improvement. Servicing shall also include vehicle, equipment, capital improvements and administrative costs associated with the annual administration and operation of the District. Process for Annual Assessment The City cannot levy and collect annual assessments within the District without complying with the procedures specified in the 1972 Act. On an annual basis; an Engineer's Report must be prepared which contains a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the district. The City Council must also adopt a resolution of intention which: • Declares the intention of the City Council to levy and collect assessments within the assessment district for the fiscal year stated therein. • Generally describes the existing and proposed improvements and any substantial changes proposed to be made in existing improvements. • Refers to the assessment district by its distinctive designation and indicate the general location of the district. • Refers to the report of the engineer, on file with the clerk, for a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the district. • Gives notice of the time and place for public hearing by the City Council on the levy of the proposed assessment. • States whether the assessment is proposed to increase from the previous year. If the assessments are to be levied in the same or lesser amounts than the maximum assessment amount approved, the clerk shall give notice by causing the resolution of intention to be published. Any interested person may, prior to the conclusion of the hearing, file a written protest which shall state all grounds of objection. The protest shall contain a description sufficient to identify the property owned by the property owner filing the protest. During the course or upon conclusion of the public hearing, the City Council may order changes in any of the matters provided in the report, including changes in the improvements, any zones withiri the assessment district, and the proposed diagram or the proposed assessment. The City Council, upon conclusion of the public hearing must then adopt a resolution confirming the diagram and assessment, either as originally proposed or as changed by it. The adoption of the resolution shall constitute the levy of an assessment for the fiscal year referred to in the assessment. Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2011/12 P300 If the assessment to be levied exceeds the maximum assessment amount previously approved, the City must comply with the procedures specified in Article XIII D and Proposition 218. The voters in the State of California in November 1996 added Article XIII D to the California Constitution imposing, among other requirements, the necessity for the City to conduct an assessment ballot procedure to enable the owners of each property on which assessments are proposed to be enacted or increased, the opportunity to express their support for, or opposition to the proposed assessment or increase in such assessment. The basic steps of the assessment ballot procedure are outlined below. The City must prepare a Notice of Public Hearing ("Notice"), which describes, along with other mandated information, the reason for the proposed assessments, and to provide a date and time of a public hearing to be held on the matter. The City must also prepare an assessment ballot, which clearly gives the property owner the ability to sign and mark their assessment ballot either in favor of, or in opposition to the proposed assessment. The Notice and assessment ballot are mailed to each affected property owner within the District a minimum of 45 days prior to the public hearing date as shown in the Notice. The City may also hold community meetings with the property owners to discuss the issues facing the District and to answer property owner questions directly. After the Notice and assessment ballot are mailed, property owners are given until the close of the public hearing, stated in the Notice, to return their signed and marked assessment ballot. During the public hearing, property owners are given the opportunity to address the City Council and ask questions or voice their concerns. At the public hearing, the returned assessment ballots received prior to the close of the public hearing are tabulated, weighted by the proposed assessment amount on each property and the results are announced by the City Council. Article XIII D provides that if, as a result of the assessment ballot proceeding, a majority protest is found to exist, the City Council shall not have the authority to levy and collect the assessments as proposed. A majority protest exists if the assessments represented by ballots submitted in opposition exceed those submitted in favor of the assessment. All returned ballots are tabulated and weighted according to the financial obligation of each particular parcel. If there is no majority protest as described above, the City Council may approve the proposed assessments. If there is a majority protest, as described above, the City will not levy and collect any assessments. Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2011/12 P301 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS The District provides for the administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing of various improvements located within the public right-of-way and dedicated easements within the boundaries of the District. Description of the Boundaries of the District The District is located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California. The boundaries of the District are generally described as that area known as Lower Etiwanda, which south of Victoria Street, north of Foothill Boulevard, generally east of Etiwanda Avenue and the I-15 freeway and west of East Avenue. Typically parcels have been annexed to the District as they have developed. Reference is also made to the Assessment Diagram included in this Report. Description of Improvements and Services The improvements are the maintenance and servicing of landscaping sites and appurtenant facilities throughout the District. The various landscaping sites that are maintained consist of parkways, median islands, street trees, paseos and community trails located within street right-of-ways and dedicated public easements which are within the boundaries of the District. The landscaping maintenance includes, but is not limited to, shrubs, turt, tree trimming in irrigated City parkways and paseos, weed and pest control, landscape irrigation systems and testing, trash, debris and graffiti removal, and associated appurtenant facilities. Services include personnel, materials, contracting services, utilities, and all necessary costs associated with the maintenance, replacement and repair required to keep the improvements in a healthy, vigorous and satisfactory condition. In addition, it is the City's intention to continue to use cost effective materials, including the future ability to replace landscaping with drought resistant or low water use plants, in order to lower expenses of the District. The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows: Parks: Garcia Park (formerly known as South Etiwanda Park). Site # Descriptive Location 9-1 The west side of East Ave. from 380 feet north of Chateau to 290 feet south of Chateau. Ground Cover area: 4,426 square feet Hardscape area: 7,360 square feet 9-2 The west side of East Ave. from 339 feet north of Brookfield to 157 feet north of Brookfield. Brookfield from East Ave. to Oak Crest. The east side of Oak Crest to 137 feet north of Brookfield. Ground Cover area: 2,390 square feet Hardscape area: 6,874 square feet 9-3 The west side of East Ave. from 790 feet north of Highfield to 256 feet south of Highfield. Ground Cover area: 8,769 square feet Hardscape area: 10,669 square feet 9-4 The west side of East Ave. From 295 feet north of Via Veneto To Via Veneto. The north side of Via Veneto From East Ave to Dolcetto. The east side of Dolcetto from Via Veneto to Miller Ave. The south side of Miller Ave from 372 feet west of Dolcetto to 240 feet east Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2011/12 P302 of Dolcetto. The west side of Dolcetto from Miller to Garcia. The north side of Garcia from Dolcetto to Etiwanda Ave. Ground Cover area: 48,612 square feet Hardscape area: 28,746 square feet 9-5 The north side of Miller from 429 feet west of Dolcetto to 1029 feet west of Dolcetto Ground Cover area: 6,519 square feet Hardscape area: 3,325 square feet 9-6 The north side of Miller From 254 feet east of Dolcetto to 167 feet west of Dolcetto. Ground Cover area: 4,089 square feet Hardscape area: 2,854 square feet 9-7 The south side of Lima, from 167 feet west of Brisas, to Green Glen. Ground Cover area: 2,580 square feet 9-8 The south side of Baseline from Etiwanda Av. to Shelby. The Baseline median from Etiwanda to 473 feet east of Shelby. Ground cover area: 16,395 square feet Hardscape area: 14,558 square feet 9-9 The north side of Candlewood St from Exbury St to Etiwanda Avenue. Ground Cover area: 3,362 square feet Hardscape area: 786 square feet 9-10 The north side of Baseline from 522 feet east of Forester to 180 feet west of Forester. The Baseline median from 503 feet east of Forester to 200 feet west of Forester. Ground cover area: 16,930 square feet Hardscape area: 13,600 square feet 9-11 The north side of Mueller Ct. from 40 feet past the east end of Mueller Ct. to 20 feet east of Dicarlo PI. Ground cover area: 9,420 square feet Hardscape area: 742 square feet 9-12 The north and south sides of Highland Av. from 217 feet west of Norcia Dr. to 210 feet east of Dicarlo PI. Ground cover area: 12,471 square feet Hardscape area: 14,445 square feet 9-13 The south side of Carne si Dr. from Etiwanda Av. to 395 feet east of Murietta Ct. Ground cover area: 8,919 square feet Hardscape area: 6,203 square feet FH-17 The Foothill Blvd. median from Etiwanda Av. to Cornwell Av. Ground cover area: 8,275 square feet Ground cover, shrubs and turf areas that make up parkways, median islands and paseos are maintained under contract by a private landscape maintenance company. Parks are maintained by the City's Park Maintenance Crews Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2011/12 P303 Map of Improvements The following page shows the map of landscaping improvements, including irrigation sites and community trails, to be maintained using District funds. Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2011/12 I_,,. ...:.II'I I II i' l: f' I I ! I.'.III _. ':I'..'1;~I .;. II ~- - - ' -: ::, ,,-1 ' . x ~~~ ; , ~;I Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 1, j,' ~ Improvement Map Rnrucxo - CUCAMONGA ~ II 1i 7 _ ~'~-Lri.J~ -L` ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ i I ll~" ~~ J_I L`++I . L L '. 11 9 t n F W ~ .. ~ L~ i/ ., I r I i 1 i' .1 4- I I. il t ~! ~~ • .. Y ;I ~ t-~ ~tl i'~I II 'I Ali ?-,r-1'I rl ' w ;: ~ 1it I ~A "ilj~l; '~l ''t~ 11 ill I~ lllii~.. ~'' II '' 1 '~~ ~ I I~rl ,~ 1 11 I ', I' I - o; , I r l ' 1 I ~ ICI y 1 tIvI F,.` i\ l: (`I(I. I; a~, '~ I I it I ~.•~ r 41. r rl •• II I','' [IL`"tth~ ,t y`I I'''II I I i I 111 ;1 r 1 A : I ~ K I I , I I .'.I'; Il~ft llt1, ~ ~ rl" •'.. ( III II I I ~ r,.~ III + 5 1 I . I't ( rq! d. I III , I ,i I ,~'~ i, 1' Ilnr .I .' ... 11 ~ l III i ;. li I I r i { '~ ' II I I.~ ! I III ail Ifs I 1 ~~ 1 III, 1I~t i~' ~{~~III II ~~I1,~11 ~ 1 i L., I, ,d ~I:L1 IrS .I+sl;l 'LI, ill I Ij I I p,, kI 1 i~jl~ ll ~~1e IIIi ~I ~' IIp l~' -~1 ~lil ( '~_ ar 1 1111, +I tl 1 r IIIII('Ir ll II~1. I' ~ I~ I r e I' I I ~ I I B iII ~ I '.. 1 fl' II'y.. 'I 1 .fll I I'. i ' ~l 1 I' IIIIIlII ~, j. ~I r, I~ O .t 'tl~. ~°N ORS I';il I Z I ~ i'. I l i 1~ Q Ir, I+I ~~ ~~' ~I'II I. I• I`II'; ~ li f I F ~I W I, ~I' ~~ I I I'. a ~I' il. 9-9 ' CHURCHST^ ~ ~ ~ I 1 1ReR m I dP~f"IPI !;~ nrr r.~ I ' s i I I I. r~' I h~ I I I II l ' I I, I 1, Q. i ~` y hh F( , I\. I' // I . HII1}}BL !; •1,11'1 ,I I ,i 1 I 0.250.125 0 ` 1111 I I I i ti I i ; -, ! I ' I 'I I I I I li.~'' 1 I ~ ~ szQ it ~i I I ~ 1 I I I 1 1 iI~ _ ...~ / i I I ei I 'j I I I 1 9-i~d f ~I ~ 'It 97~~1c 1 I I II I I < i ASELINE RDI B-1U I ~ I I1 l i! I I tf5l~ It Qn Q ? I ~ O I t 1 ~ py ~I \ I Ifr : I: ' , l.T , :(I ,. ~' I I! ~ 1, I •.,L I 9~3 i•. .., I ~~~`,I-~ I~ I I_ I .I-1' 1 ~11 ~I ~~1 ,Illr~llli. I ~~•'~~. 9S~MILLER.AV_n~~ ' '1 I' .I ~~•, y~,, I I~_ ~.. i i ;''i9~0 r•I,~;i;lr~l z~~ _ll; _~ ~ i. L~ ' ~~~_ I i. III ..I LI,,,; II ,,1 ~,y 111 •~ h! 1y •~ I S. ! 1 I ~ ' j Iil I i HIJLI_ i. .. , .... vllil I ~' I'Illi r~~ r . I 7 i..l-; I 0.25 Miles P304 IV i Q WATER METER ^O IRRIGATION PUMP -•••-• PE TRAIL IRRIGATION LINE ®PARKS Q LMD 9 Boundary MAJOR STREET FREEWAY j PARCELS , 1 me mep•.aele eM OeaprepM1ic l"lomntion ('Inlormati"n~ ' vlkda py •M rrrroupM1 IM1e Clty of RanUO Cusrmrge re pxemM.e e W e{c re.ource ol0ernrel inlamvtion. Tlie City of Re"NO Luuma"pa makes nor imgea no e ry, reaeeemeoon or pwmmae as ro me mment. spuerrce, auvr•ry wrtpl«aness or emefness o(eny I"lomution pavNeE b you M1erein. The user sM1OUp not rely FH-171S IN LMD 9,BUT upo"'^•'^romuoan ror.nyre~n.naeareaeab me.w.eenW a•nh anv ane au rmorn.oon ar.ewua nereb. MAINTAINED BY MARIPOSA me cW or R.naro caurro"ae •*Rtarh em..nnam en:ucon eeaelrm em •m at rearee.numru em weRamees, bawirq. eq nq rmrea ro, ma irtytee emm~tiea of merwmadlW errs arneas ra a p•nicurar ourpvse. me city or Rencn" cwarwrga we nenner •ccaq rror assume ern rnury, recareress attire uutwn for (I) erry anars, om'rsziom «iruavnaes N aunt Inlommaon PevbeE eMM (n) arty eram ar Iroabn urmp eue to erry percam ra•erce uaan Ne InbmnYOn ..Inge ner«n. I II' I I - I~~nw " 171:1'11111' fir" Iilll I.!~ ~ t J, ~I ~ '~~" ~~ ~ i Irl I i I ' 4 I I I' I y I I, ' , I , I I I, I ~~ I ~ 111 'III I I , I ~ ~ 1 I 1 ~ I I I ? I) ;; , ~ I, I III:II " ~ i I'i~i~l I ~ I 'I .. I .-(I'1 ! Illi P305 ESTIMATE OF COSTS The estimated costs of administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing the improvements as described in the Plans and Specifications are summarized below. Each year, as part of the assessment district levy calculation process, the costs and expenses are reviewed and the annual costs are projected for the following fiscal year. District Budget Estimated 2011112 Bud et Personnel Services Re ular Salaries $150,160.00 Part-time Salaries 7,660.00 Frin a Benefits 70 940.00 Subtotal Personnel $228,960.00 O erations and Maintenance O erations and Maintenance $24,550.00 Emer enc E ui ment and Vehicle Rental 1,200.00 Contract Services 229,260.00 Tree Maintenance 6,600.00 Utilities Water Utilities 25.990.00 Electric Utilities 8,730.00 Assessment Administration 8,750.00 General Overhead 54 320.00 Subtotal O erations and Maintenance $359,400.00 Ca ital Ex enditures Ca ital Pro'ects 110 000.00 Subtotal Ca ital Ex enditures $110,000.00 Total District Ex enditure Bud et $698,360.00 Total Estimated Assessment $379,530.00 Plus Anticipated Delinquency Penalty 970.00 Total Estimated Revenue $360,500.00 Plus Reserve Fund Contribution 317 860.00 Total Expenditure Budget $696,360.00 Total Estimated Assessment $379,530.00 Total District EBU Count 2 029.56 Actual Assessment er EBU -Fiscal Year 2011/12 $187.00 Maximum Allowable Assessment er EBU -Fiscal Year 2011/12 $501.55 Each year, prior to the assessments being placed on the tax roll, the City will review the budget and determine the amount needed to maintain the improvements for the upcoming fiscal year. The actual assessment per EBU will be based on the estimated costs of maintenance, available fund balance and maximum allowable assessment with the goal of maintaining the improvements in a satisfactory Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2011/12 P306 and healthy condition. The actual assessment amount may be lower than the maximum allowable assessment; however it may not exceed the maximum unless the increase is approved by the property owners in accordance with Proposition 218. It is the intent of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to maintain an Operating Reserve which shall not exceed the estimated costs of maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or when the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The reserve balance information for the District is as follows: Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2011 Reserve Fund Balance $2,673,240.00 Operating Reserve Contribution -Fiscal Year 2011/12 (317,860.00) Operating Reserve Collection -Fiscal Year 2011/12 970.00 Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2012 Reserve Fund Balance $2,356,350.00 Definitions of Budget Items The following definitions describe the costs and expenses included in the District Budget Personnel Services Regular Salaries: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all full-time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Part Time Salaries: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all part time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Fringe Benefits: This item includes the benefits available to City employees: health care, vacation, sick time, and retirement fund. Operations and Maintenance Contract Services: This item includes the contract costs of a lahdscape maintenance company responsible for the ongoing maintenance of the District improvements. Tree Maintenance: This item includes the contract costs attributed to maintaining the street trees and other trees throughout the District. Utilities -Water: This item includes the costs to furnish water for the landscaping within the District. Utilities -Electric: This item includes the costs to furnish electricity required for the operation and maintenance of the sprinklers and irrigation controllers. Assessment Administration: This item includes the cost to all particular departments and staff of the City, and consultants for providing the administration, coordination and management of District services, operations, and incidental expenses related to the District. This item also includes creation of an annual engineer's report, resolutions and placing the assessment amounts onto the County tax roll each year, along with responding to any public inquiries and future Proposition 218 balloting proceedings. General Overhead: This item includes the costs of all departments and staff of the City for providing the coordination of District services, inspections, annual bid management, responding to public concerns, public education, accounting, auditing and procedural matters associated with the District. This item also includes an allocation for general City staff time for administrative functions and Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2011112 P307 systems that provide for a functional and operational assessment district within the City's administrative structure. Capital Expenditures: Capital P~oiects: This item includes new improvements to further enhance the level and quality of service provided within the boundaries of the District. This may include new monuments, irrigation systems, and other large improvements. Operating Reserve Collection: Operatino Reserve Collection: This item includes the amount to be collected to maintain reserves to enable the City to pay for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or whenever the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The Reserve Fund contribution will continue until such a time the Reserve Fund balance is approximately one half of the annual costs. The fund may be allowed to accumulate in anticipation of any unforeseen expenses not included in the yearly maintenance costs. This may include, but is not limited to, tree replacements, repair of damaged equipment due to vandalism, storms and other similar events. Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 10 Fiscal Year 2011/12 P308 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT General Pursuant to the 1972 Act and Article XIII D, all parcels that have a special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements and services shall be identified, and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel shall be determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of improvements. The 1972 Act, permits the establishment of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include the operation, maintenance and servicing of landscaping improvements. Section 22573 of the 1972 Act requires that maintenance assessments must be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. This Section states: "The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district maybe apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements." The determination of whether or not a lot or parcel will benefit from the improvements shall be made pursuant to the Improvement Act of 1911 (Division 7 (commencing with Section 5000) (of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California]." The 1972 Act also permits the designation of zones of benefit within any individual assessment district if "by reasons or variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive different degrees of benefit from the improvement" (Sec. 22547). Article XIII D, Section 4(a) of the California Constitution limits the amount of any assessment to the proportional special benefit conferred on the property. Article XIII D also provides that publicly owned properties must be assessed unless there is clear and convincing evidence that those properties receive no special benefit from the assessment. Exempted from the assessment would be the areas of public streets, public avenues, public lanes, public roads, public drives, public courts, public alleys, public easements and rights-of-ways, public greenbelts and public parkways. The net amount to be assessed may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels. Proposition 218, approved by the voters in November 1996, requires the City to separate general benefit from special benefit, where only special benefit is assessed. Benefit The maintenance and servicing of the improvements within the District (which are described in the Description of Improvements and Services Section of this report) are for the benefit of the properties within the District, and as such confer a special and direct benefit to parcels within the District by: improving the livability, appearance, and desirability for properties within the boundaries of the District, and ensuring that improvements do not reach a state of deterioration or disrepair so as to be materially detrimental to properties within the District, and Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 11 Fiscal Year 2011/12 P309 • providing beautification, shade and overall enhancement to properties within the District. The above mentioned items affect the assessed property in a way that is particular and distinct from their effect on other parcels and that real property in general and the public at large do not share. They contribute to a specific enhancement of the properties within the District. Since these improvements, including the community trails, were installed and are maintained specifically for the properties within the District; only properties within the District receive a special benefit and are assessed for said maintenance. General Benefit In addition to the special benefits received by parcels within the District, there are derivative general benefits that are conferred on parcels outside the boundaries of the District which include: • the control of dust and insect infestations, and • the visual enhancement of the area to persons or vehicles that may travel through the District. However it has been determined that these benefits are derivative and do not provide a direct benefit to parcels outside of the district that are not being assessed. Method of Assessment Each of the parcels within the District is deemed to receive special benefit from the improvements. Each parcel that has a special benefit conferred upon it as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements are identified and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel is determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of the improvements. To assess special benefit appropriately, it is necessary to relate the different type of parcel improvements to each other. The Equivalent Benefit Unit ("EBU") method of apportionment uses the single family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single family home equals one Equivalent Benefit Unit (EBU). Every other land-use is converted to EBUs based on an assessment formula that equates to the property's specific development status, type of development (land-use), and size of the property, as compared to a single family home. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land-use types, as assigned by County use code, to determine each parcel's EBU assignment. Land-Use Equivalent Dwelling Units Pro ert T e Coun Use Code EBU Value Multi tier Single Family Residential 1.00 Dwelling Unit Multi-Family Residential 1.00 Dwelling Unit Non-Residential Improved 2.00 Acre Vacant Property 0.25 Acre The use of the latest County Assessor's Secured Roll shall be the basis for the Property Type determination and units/acreage assignments, unless better data is available to the City. In addition, if any parcel within the District is identified by the County Auditor/Controller to be an invalid parcel number for the current fiscal year, the Property Type and EBU assignment shall be based on the Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 12 Fiscal Year 2011/12 P310 correct parcel number and/or new parcel number(s) County use code and subsequent property information. If a single parcel has changed to multiple parcels, the EBU assignment and assessment amount applied to each of the new parcels will be recalculated rather than spread the proportionate share of the original assessment. The following table summarizes the Fiscal Year 2011/12 maximum allowable assessment rates for the District: Property Type (County Use Code) Maximum Allowable Assessment Rate er EBU Actual Assessment Rate er EBU Total Units/Acres Total EBUs Single Family Residential $496.55 $187.00 936.00 936.00 Multi-Family Residential 496.55 $187.00 1,057.00 1,057.00 Non-Residentiallmproved 496.55 $187.00 18.26 36.56 Vacant Property 496.55 $187.00 0.00 0.00 The total amount of maintenance and incidental costs for maintaining the landscaping and community trail improvements is assessed to the individual parcels of real property within the District in proportion to the special benefit received by such parcels of real property. The proposed individual assessments are shown on the assessment roll in this report. Maximum and Historical Assessments The maximum allowable assessment per EBU listed in the District budget above, is the amount which was approved in 2000/01, when the District was formed, and subsequent District annexations. Commencing in Fiscal Year 2001/02, the amount of the maximum allowable assessment is proposed to increase each year based upon the Consumer Price Index ("CPI"), All Urban Consumers, for the Los Angeles-Anaheim-San Bernardino Area, as determined by the United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics or its successor. Each year the percentage difference between the CPI for March of each year and the CPI for the previous March shall be computed. The assessment shall be adjusted by an amount not to exceed such percentage for the following fiscal year. Should the Bureau of Labor Statistics revise such index or discontinue preparation of such index, the revised index or a comparable system as approved by the City Council shall be used for determining fluctuations in the cost of living. Historical maximum assessment amounts and actual assessment amounts are shown in the table below: Fiscal Year Maximum Assessment er EBU Actual Assessment er EBU 2000/01 $375.91 $375.91 2001/02 388.02 375.91 2002/03 398.81 375.91 2003/04 414.44 375.91 2004/05 421.71 375.91 2005/06 438.67 375.91 2006/07 459.15 375.91 2007/08 476.76 387.94 2008/09 492.41 387.94 2009/10 487.50 387.94 2011112 496.55 187.00 Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 13 Fiscal Year 2011 /12 P311 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM An Assessment Diagram for the District is shown on the following page. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the County Assessor of the County San Bernardino, at the time this report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Engineer's Report. Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 14 Fiscal Year 2011/12 P312 N ~ ~ ~ ~~ V w ~ y a' J o c 1 ~ U ~ `n ~ N ~-~, -- ny RJJa4~ rn ^' ~ o 4 ~ .._.._.. ~! ~ ~ J 1.r u> i N C ~ A, N - ~ J m ~ O W I I a~ ~I.r ~ ~ r 3 m o 0 .= i ~ Q 5 ~ _..~I _.._.._ i nb' ise3 in Q i ny epueM!33 ~-:..._.._.._.. i ny epuenng3 ~ i ~ __ /_'_ --~ i V ! _ 1 1 ~ -~~\-~ ~e >IaaJ~- e4 ~ ~ C ._.._.._.._.._.._.._.y I i J ny Jalsayooy '-- ----i-- i !--- ~ i ny Jalsayooa ,...~ j ~ ~\~ ~ i i --- ny ua~!II!W r._.._.._..- - ---- --1 ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~-- -----i ny ua>i!II!W i '. i i i ny uaneH ~-- ----- -- ------ -- -----iny uaneH I _ -~---'-II ny esowJaH i- - - -- --- - -- --- - - ! ny esowJaH i I i nV PIeQ!4oJb ~ J i --inV PIe9!4oJb' ~ ~ ~ 1 r ny uewllaH i I ~,.•~" ~ ny uewllaH L v i !nV PJefau!n 3S ue!lawe~ ~ - ---- ----- _~ ~.._.._ 2 .._. -'Y. .._._ -r nd aAOJ~ 9cl~$~~ ~`~Fs L J E 5 ~ c m LL Q ~i~~Y i$~~?~C gge.. - v c ~fl~~i€Efis~c m o y $gyyp'dd~g =FC¢a °xc °23$$~B EiQ ~' z~ a;a~ .U~¢~$ P313 ASSESSMENT ROLL ent Roll The assessment roll is a listing of the assessment for Fiscal Year 2011/12 apportioned to each lot or parcel, as shown on the last equalized roll of the Assessor of the County of San Bernardino. The following tables summarize the Fiscal Year 2011/12 maximum and actual assessments for the District: Property Type (Cou,nty Use Code Maximum Allowable Assessment Rate er EBU Total UnitslAcres Total EBUs Maximum Allowable Assessment Single Family Residential $501.55 936.00 936.00 $469,450.80 Multi-Family Residential 501.55 1,057.00 1,057.00 530,138.35 Non-Residentiallmproved 501.55 18.28 36.56 18,336.67 Vacant Property 501.55 0.00 0.00 0.00 TOTALS 2,011.26 2,029.56 $1,017,925.82 Property Type (County Use Code Actual Assessment Rate er EBU Total UnitslAcres Total EBUs Actual Assessment Single Family Residential $187.00 936.00 936.00 $175,032.00 Multi-Family Residential 187.00 1,057.00 1,057.00 197,659.00 Non-Residentiallmproved 187.00 18.28 36.56 6,836.72 Vacant Property 187.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 TOTALS 2,011.28 2,029.56 $379,527.72 A copy of the full assessment roll is available for review in the City Clerk's office. Annexations There were no annexations effective for the 2011/12 Fiscal Year: Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 15 Fiscal Year 2011 /12 P314 Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2011/2012 City of Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 10 (Rancho Etiwanda) P315 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 10 (RANCHO ETIWANDA) 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Phone: 909.477.2740 Fax: 909.477.2741 CITY COUNCIL L. Dennis Michael, Mayor Sam Spagnolo, Mayor Pro Tem William Alexander, Council Member Chuck Buquet, Council Member Diane Williams, Council Member CITY STAFF John R. Gillison, Assistant City Manager Linda D. Daniels, Deputy City Manager William Wittkopf, Public Works Director Ingrid Y. Bruce, GIS/Special Districts Manager Christopher Bopko, Management Analyst III P316 TABLE OF CONTENTS .ENGINEER'S LETTER INTRODUCTION 3 Reason for Assessment .............................................................................................3 Process for Annual Assessment .................................................................................3 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS 5 Description of the Boundaries of the District ...................................................:...........5 Description of Improvements and Services ................................................................5 Map of Improvements .................................................................................................7 ESTIMATE OF COSTS District Budget ............................................................................................................8 Definitions of Budget Items .........................................................................................9 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT 11 General .....................................................................................................................11 Special Benefit .........................................................................................................11 General Benefit ......................................................:.................................................12 Method of Assessment Spread ................................................................................12 Maximum and Historical Assessments .....................................................................13 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM ASSESSMENT ROLL 14 15 Assessment Roll ...........................:.........:.................................................................15 Annexations ..............................................................................................................15 P317 ENGINEER'S LETTER WHEREAS, on July 6~", 2011, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 (the "1972 Act") adopted its Resolution No. 11-098, a Resolution Initiating Proceedings for the Levy of Annual Assessments for Landscape Maintenance District No. 10 (Rancho Etiwanda) (the "District"); and WHEREAS, the Resolution Initiating Proceedings directed NBS to prepare and file an Engineer's Report for Fiscal Year 2011/12 pursuant to the requirements of the 1972 Act. The Engineer's Report presents the plans and specifications describing the general nature, location and extent of the improvements to be maintained, an estimate of the costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements for the District for the referenced fiscal year, a diagram for the District, showing the area and properties proposed to be assessed, and an assessment of the estimated costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing the improvements, assessing the net amount upon all assessable lots and/or parcels within the District in proportion to the special benefit received; and NOW THEREFORE, the following assessment is proposed to be authorized in order to pay the estimated costs of maintenance, operation and servicing of the improvements to be paid by the assessable real property within the boundaries of the District in proportion to the special benefit received. The following table summarizes the proposed assessment. SUMMARY OF ASSESSMENT Fiscal Year 2011/12 Total Estimated Assessment $462,770.00 Less Anticipated Delinquencies 29 020.00 Total Estimated Revenue $433,750.00 Plus Reserve Fund Contribution 114 170.00 Total Expenditure Budget $547,920.00 Total District EBU Count 751.00 Actual Assessment per EBU $616.20 Maximum Allowable Assessment per EBU $771.79 In making the assessments contained herein pursuant to the 1972 Act: I have identified all parcels which will have a special benefit conferred upon them from the improvements described in the Special Benefit Section of this Engineer's Report (the "Specially Benefited Parcels"). For particulars as to the identification of said parcels, reference is made to the Assessment Diagram, a copy of which is included in this Engineer's Report. I have evaluated the costs and expenses of the improvements upon the Specially Benefited Parcels. In making such evaluation: a. The proportionate special benefit derived by each Specially Benefited Parcel from the improvements was determined in relationship to the entirety of the maintenance costs of the improvements; Landscape Maintenance District No. 10 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2011/12 P318 b. No assessment has been imposed on any Specially Benefited Parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on such parcel from the improvements; and c. Any general benefits from the improvements have been separated from the special benefits and only special benefits have been assessed. I, the undersigned, respectfully submit the enclosed Engineer's Report and, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, the Engineer's Report, Assessments, and the Assessment Diagram herein have been prepared and computed in accordance with the order of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the 1972 Act, Article XIII D of the Constitution of the State of California ("Article XIII D") and the Proposition 218 Omnibus Implementation Act ("Proposition 218"), (the 1972 Act, Article XIII D and Proposition 218 are collectively referred to as the "Assessment Law"). Mark A. Steuer, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Landscape Maintenance District No. 10 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 2 Fiscal Year 2011/12 P319 INTRODUCTION Reason for Assessment Approval of the assessment covered by this Engineer's Report will generate the revenue necessary to: Provide for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements described in this Engineer's Report. Maintenance may include but is not limited to, all of the following: the repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement, providing for the life, growth, health and beauty of the landscaping, including cultivation, irrigation, trimming, spraying, fertilizing or treating for disease or injury, the removal of trimming, rubbish, debris and other solid waste, the maintenance, repair and replacement as necessary of all irrigation systems and the removal of graffiti from walls immediately adjacent to the cultivated areas. Servicing means the furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operating and servicing of any improvement. Servicing shall also include vehicle, equipment, capital improvements and administrative costs associated with the annual administration and operation of the District. Process for Annual Assessment The City cannot levy and collect annual assessments within the District without complying with the procedures specified in the 1972 Act. On an annual basis, an Engineer's Report must be prepared which contains a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the district. The City Council must also adopt a resolution of intention which: • Declares the intention of the City Council to levy and collect assessments within the assessment district for the fiscal year stated therein. • Generally describes the existing and proposed improvements and any substantial changes proposed to be made in existing improvements. • Refers to the assessment district by its distinctive designation and indicate the general location of the district. • Refers to the report of the engineer, on file with the clerk, for a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the district. • Gives notice of the time and place for public hearing by the City Council on the levy of the proposed assessment. • States whether the assessment is proposed to increase from the previous year. If the assessments are to be levied in the same or lesser amounts than the maximum assessment amount approved, the clerk shall give notice by causing the resolution of intention to be published. Any interested person may, prior to the conclusion of the hearing, file a written protest which shall state all grounds of objection. The protest shall contain a description sufficient to identify the property owned by the property owner filing the protest. During the course or upon conclusion of the public hearing, the City Council may order changes in any of the matters provided in the report, including changes in the improvements, any zones within the assessment district, and the proposed diagram or the proposed assessment. Landscape Maintenance District No. 10 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2011/12 P320 The City Council, upon conclusion of the public hearing must then adopt a resolution confirming the diagram and assessment, either as originally proposed or as changed by it. The adoption of the resolution shall constitute the levy of an assessment for the fscal year referred to in the assessment. If the assessment to be levied exceeds the maximum assessment amount previously approved, the City must comply with the procedures specified in Article XIII D and Proposition 218. The voters in the State of California in November 1996 added Article XIII D to the California Constitution imposing, among other requirements, the necessity for the City to conduct an assessment ballot procedure to enable the owners of each property on which assessments are proposed to be enacted or increased, the opportunity to express their support for, or opposition to the proposed assessment or increase in such assessment. The basic steps of the assessment ballot procedure are outlined below. The City must prepare a Notice of Public Hearing ("Notice'), which describes, along with other mandated information, the reason for the proposed assessments, and to provide a date and time of a public hearing to be held on the matter. The City must also prepare an assessment ballot, which clearly gives the property owner the ability to sign and mark their assessment ballot either in favor of, or in opposition to the proposed assessment. The Notice and assessment ballot are mailed to each affected property owner within the assessment district a minimum of 45 days prior to the public hearing date as shown in the Notice. The City may also hold community meetings with the property owners to discuss the issues facing the district and to answer property owner questions directly. After the Notice and assessment ballot are mailed, property owners are given until the close of the public hearing, stated in the Notice, to return their signed and marked assessment ballot. During the public hearing, property owners are given the opportunity to address the City Council and ask questions or voice their concerns. At the public hearing, the returned assessment ballots received prior to the close of the public hearing are tabulated, weighted by the proposed assessment amount on each property and the results are announced by the City Council. Article XIII D provides that if, as a result of the assessment ballot proceeding, a majority protest is found to exist, the City Council shall not have the authority to levy and collect the assessments as proposed. A majority protest exists if the assessments represented by ballots submitted in opposition exceed those submitted in favor of the assessment. All returned ballots are tabulated and weighted according to the financial obligation of each particular parcel. If there is no majority protest as described above, the City Council may approve the proposed assessments. If there is a majority protest, as described above, the City will not levy and collect any assessments. Landscape Maintenance District No. 10 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2011/12 P321 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS The District provides for the administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing of various improvements located within the public right-of-way and dedicated easements within the boundaries of the District. Description of the Boundaries of the District The District is located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California. The boundaries of the District are generally described as that area known as Rancho Etiwanda, which lies north of Highway 210, east of Day Creek Channel, and west of Hanley Avenue. Typically parcels have been annexed to the District as they have developed. Reference is also made to the Assessment Diagram included in this Report. Description of Improvements and Services The improvements are the maintenance and servicing of landscaping sites and appurtenant facilities throughout the District. The various landscaping sites that are maintained consist of parkways, median islands, street trees, paseos and community trails located within street right-of-ways and dedicated public easements which are within the boundaries of the District. The landscaping maintenance includes, but is not limited to, shrubs, turf, tree trimming in irrigated City parkways and paseos, weed and pest control, landscape irrigation systems and testing, trash, debris and graffiti removal, and associated appurtenant facilities. Services include personnel, materials, contracting services, utilities, and all necessary costs associated with the maintenance, replacement and repair required to keep the improvements in a healthy, vigorous and satisfactory condition. In addition, it is the City's intention to continue to use cost effective materials, including the future ability to replace landscaping with drought resistant or low water use plants, in order to lower expenses of the District. The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows: Parks: Day Creek Park. Site # Descriptive Location 10-1 The west side of Day Creek from 790 feet north of Richfield to Wilson. The north side of Wilson from Day Creek to 227 feet west of Day Creek. This site overlaps 10-2. Ground Cover area: 16,941 square feet Hardscaoe area: 3,589 square feet 10-2 The north and south side of Wilson from 497 feet west of Alvarado to Day Creek with 1 station at top of highest retaining wall on corner of Wilson and Day Creek. This station overlaps site 10-1. The south side of Wilson from Day Creek to Bluegrass. The Wilson median from Day Creek to Bluegrass. Ground Cover area: 47,275 square feet Hardscaoe area: 6,444 square feet 10-3 The west side of Day Creek from Wilson to 144 feet south of Clydesdale. The Day Creek median from Wilson to Banyan. Ground Cover area: 32,619 square feet Hardscaoe area: 10,983 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 10 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2011/12 P322 10-4 The east side of Day Creek from 648 feet south of Keenland to Wilson. Ground Cover area: 15,952 square feet Hardscape area: 4,365 square feet 10-5 The west side of Bluegrass from Wilson to 705 feet south of Challendon. Ground Cover area: 26,882 square feet Hardscape area: 12,220 square feet 10-6 The south side of Banyan from Rochester to Day Creek. The north side of Banyan from 427 feet west of Rocking Horse to Rocking Horse. The west side of Day Creek from Banyan to Vintage. The Day Creek median from Banyan to Vintage. The north side of Vintage from Day Creek to paseo ending 153 feet west of Sand Hill. Ground Cover area: 44,000 square feet Hardscape area: 16,197 square feet 10-7 The north side of Vintage from 180 feet east of Taylor Canyon Place to Day Creek. The east side of Day Creek from Vintage to Banyan: The south side of Banyan from Day Creek to Bluegrass. Ground Cover area: 22,164 square feet Hardscape area: 11,724 square feet 10-8 The landscape against the south side facing wall north of the 210 freeway from the top of the slope on the east side of Day Creek to 300 feet eastward. The Day Creek median from the 210 freeway to Vintage. The east side of Day Creek from Caltrans ROW to Vintage. The south side of Vintage from Day Creek to 180 feet east of Taylor Canyon. Ground Cover area: 16,841 square feet Hardscape area: 7,025 square feet 10-9 The north side of Coyote from Brookstone Place to Day Creek. The east side of Day Creek from Coyote to 358 feet north of Coyote. The west side of Day Creek from 118 feet north of Coyote to 380 feet north of Coyote. Ground cover area: 9,403 square feet Hardscape area: 6,052 square feet `This site previously had 8,488 square feet of ground cover and 5,752 of Hardscape prior to the addition of the area on the west side of Day Creek 10-10 The north side of Wilson from 395 feet east of Day Creek to Day Creek. The eastside of Day Creek from Wilsoh to Blackstone. The south side of Blackstone from Day Creek to Stoneview. The north side of Blackstone from Day Creek to 165 feet west of Stoneview. Ground cover area: 26,304 square feet Hardscape area: 19,117 square feet 10-11 The west side of Day Creek from 340 feet north of Banyan to Banyan. The north side of Banyan from Day Creek to Rocking Horse. Ground cover area: 20,378 square feet Hardscape area: 11,212 square feet 10-12 The paseo on the east side of Stoneview Rd. across from Duncaster PI. Ground cover area: 3,326 square feet Hardscape area: 2,374 square feet Ground cover, shrubs and turf areas that make up parkways, median islands and paseos are maintained under contract by a private landscape maintenance company. Parks are maintained by the City's Park Maintenance Crews. Landscape Maintenance District No. 10 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2011/12 P323 Map of Improvements The following page shows the map of landscaping improvements, including irrigation sites and community trails, to be maintained using District funds. Landscape Maintenance District No. 10 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2011/12 ~ P324' _; " 10 e Maintenance District No ~ L d ' ~ an s . cap r , , . ' I ' ' rovement Ma I ` ~ m I ~ ANOHO AMONG 1 I i l~i ~ ~ ~- r ;~~ i I III ~ ~ ~ I // I -r 1 1 I r r 3 I. __ °~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~' t _ ' I ~ / ~ / ~ l~ 1 l S L j ~ ( t ~( ` i ~ 1 T \ 11 , l l~ ~ r 1 ~ \V 1~ ~ ~~/'Z. , 11 1 ,, ,. . , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~I i i ~. ,~ I ~ I .. .~ .- 1 ~ li ~ ' _ i ~ ' -: I , I ~ ~~ ~ I I I ~ 0 ~I r - ~ I -9 ~. [ 1 ` I . I i 4 1 I I I I ~ ~~ ~ ~ I I 1 I r';,, 1 1 I i I , I ~ , ,o,z ~ ~ , II ~ ~ I I I ~` ~ J. I C I ' I ~~ P , P ~ r i ~ i l~ '. I 10.71 ~ __ /F I 1 I~ r i P~ ~`N ~ (; i 1 ~ I I ' ~ - ~ ' ~~ ~ I 10 10 I ~ l I 1 I ~ ~ ~ i_ r ~ I I III r ~ 1. III '( I ~ ~ ~ 1 Ir f I ~ ~ ~ i 1 V 70-2 WILSON AV i I 1 7 I I ~:.; ~ I. I 1703 Q'~ 10~ 1. r l i I ' I ~ I ~, i I ~., ~ ~ i I ~ I' i I 1 ~~ i- i I I Q 70 5 I I i, i L i4. i I ~ J I, 1 it I I I i ~ ~ ~ lal I I ~ I I f I ~ I I I ~ . I ~ I ~ f! I I f' I _ I I s I I ' ~~ ~ ~ ' l 1 I I I , ! ~ iij I !rll.I r ~ - ~ . ' i III I I III t 1' ~ I I I I ~' Yy. i I i I 1 f ~' ~. I me ~ esm ena pc peo6 pn' i can i^mmrmenpn') i ~ ~ ~ I I' 1 I ~ I ~ r I I~ 1 1 I ~ ~ I I ' I.I I II ~. eimde Mane mmupnm cry ie n e nmprge . .. 1 - ~ presenmtl esa PUdc Ig Inbtmel on. I ~ ~ ~ I ' I Tne City of Rencno CUwmo B k peec no I 1 I , I 11 ~ ~ I ~ ' ~ penry regesenmtlono P r t In wmm~t sryuence ettYnc/oorryr ~ 5 o1onY I I i a1 1 Imo' I I I , - I I brmae pr a ar r n I .m n N r ly ' r 1 I I - 1 ponm I b 4 1 y a' d cmar ' eepem mH h r e n i r r p man I ~ ~ I I.' I- ~ I. ' ' ~ I i me cM IR m c P pgmp mrrtn mr teon I i I ~ I' I 0] i ~ '.. 'I i asua r m II p mti a r a airq. ' -Y • Y rry na but n i t teE b, M plea f 1 n t WI I nme%1 p m m p pac m cm ie n e ppa IyJ ~ I I I I I,w E EE ~ I I 1 ~ ~ ' li I ~ '. ~ shall Mreccepi nor es rl'Illiry gaNless onna i :. Q' R. l a a oi9n u o ® smo mano~l w eee e p i I i ~ ~ namr Oair ro e n ~ r i p r u ~ a w sy persa v ace soon me Inrormerba ~ ' I 70-11- 1 ~ I ~ O,o, i j ~ ~ i' 1 1' 1' I ~ I ~ ~ i l ~, 10.6 _ I r r ~ I I ~ ~ I; 1 ~ 1 I ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ i_ Q WATER METER ~ 1 I I ~~; I I I ' I I i I ~ 4, I iI I I I I I I I I ~i~ll 4 II II 1 ~~ I i' I ^O IRRIGATION PUMP ~ ~. I ~, I~~ I~,' ~ , 1 11 i ~,~ ,~, X11 ~! ~ ~ I ! I I -°•-• PE TRAIL 10'6 I IRRIGATION LINE I I I ~ r ~ I I I I 1 i ji I ': i ~ PARKS ~- I I~'III ~ I ~I~i _ 11 ~, 1' ~ ~ t I ~ r Q LMD 10 BOUNDARY I 1 ~ ' ~ I I I r' ~ ~ ' I pNRP X210 Op ~ ~o RP ~ ' l _ , '~ i i I MAJOR STREET I ' ~Z i ~ ~ r i i r I 1210'FW - . I ' - FREEWAY 121.OaOFRP 12100NRP ~ HIGHLAND AV IPARCELS I ~ ~ .; i '. I1~ ~ ~I I ~ I I II i 1 ~1"i 'ill',: i II I P325 ESTIMATE OF COSTS The estimated costs of administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing the improvements as described in the Plans and Specifications are summarized below. Each year, as part of the assessment district levy calculation process, the costs and expenses are reviewed and the annual costs are projected for the following fiscal year. District Estimated . ' 2011/12 Budget Personnel Services Regular Salaries $159,070.00 Overtime Salaries ~ 1,050.00 Part-time Salaries 27,590.00 Fringe Benefts 77.790.00 Subtotal Personnel $265,500.00 Operations and Maintenance Operations and Maintenance $26,500.00 Operations and Maintenance/Facilities 4,000.00 Emergency Equipment and Vehicle Rental 1,000.00 Equipment Operations and Maintenance 1,000.00 Contract Services 123,300.00 Contract Services/Facilities 2,000.00 Tree Maintenance 6,860.00 Utilities Water Utilities 72,000.00 Electric Utilities 50,400.00 Assessment Administration 4,130.00 General Overhead 31.410.00 . Subtotal Operations and Maintenance $322,600.00 Capital Expenditures Caoital Projects $30.000.00 Subtotal Capital Expenditures $30,000.00 Total District Expenditure Budget ~ $618,100.00 Total Estimated Assessment $462,770.00 Less Anticipated Delinquencies (29.020.00) Total Estimated Revenue $433,750.00 Plus Operating Reserve Fund Contribution 114.170.00 Total Expenditure Budget $547,920.00 Total Estimated Assessment $462,770.00 Total District EBU Count 751.00 Actual Assessment per EBU -Fiscal Year 2011/12 $616.20 Maximum Allowable Assessment er EBU -Fiscal Year 2011/12 $771.79 Landscape Maintenance District No. 10 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 8 Fiscal Year 2011 /12 P326 Each year, prior to the assessments being placed on the tax roll, the City will review the budget and determine the amount needed to maintain the improvements for the upcoming fiscal year. The actual assessment per EBU will be based on the estimated costs of maintenance, available fund balance and maximum allowable assessment with the goal of maintaining the improvements in a satisfactory and healthy condition. The actual assessment amount may be lower than the maximum allowable assessment; however it may not exceed the maximum unless the increase is approved by the property owners in accordance with Proposition 218. , It is the intent of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to maintain an Operating Reserve which shall not exceed the estimated costs of maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or when the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The reserve balance information for the District is as follows: Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2011 Reserve Fund Balance $1,068,250.00 Operating Reserve Contribution -Fiscal Year 2011/12 (114,170.00) Operating Reserve Collection -Fiscal Year 2011/12 0.00 Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2012 Reserve Fund Balance $954,080.00 Definitions of Budget Items The following definitions describe the costs and expenses included in the District Budget Personnel Services Regular Salaries: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all full-time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Part Time Salaries: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all part time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Fringe Benefits: This item includes the benefits available to City employees: health care, vacation, sick time, and retirement fund. Operations and Maintenance Contract Services: This item includes the contract costs of a landscape maintenance company responsible for the ongoing maintenance of the District improvements. Tree Maintenance: This item includes the contract costs attributed to maintaining the street trees and other trees throughout the District. Utilities -Water: This item includes the costs to furnish water for the landscaping within the District. Utilities -Electric: This item includes the costs to furnish electricity required for the operation and maintenance of the sprinklers and irrigation controllers. Assessment Administration: This item includes the cost to all particular departments and staff of the City, and consultants for providing the administration; coordination and management of District services, operations, and incidental expenses related to the District. This item also includes creation of an annual engineer's report, resolutions and placing the assessment amounts onto the County tax roll each year, along with responding to any public inquiries and future Proposition 218 balloting proceedings. Landscape Maintenance District No. 10 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2011 /12 . P327 General Overhead: This item includes the costs of all departments and staff of the City for providing the coordination of District services, inspections, annual bid management, responding to public concerns, public education, accounting, auditing and procedural matters associated with the District. This item also includes an allocation for general City staff time for administrative functions and systems that provide for a functional and operational assessment district within the City's administrative structure. Capital Expenditures: Capital Projects: This item includes new improvements to further enhance the level and quality of service provided within the boundaries of the District. This may include new monuments, irrigation systems, and other large improvements. Operating Reserve Collection: Operating Reserve Collection: This item includes the amount to be collected to maintain reserves to enable the City to pay for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or whenever the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The Reserve Fund contribution will continue until such a time the Reserve Fund balance is approximately one half of the annual costs. The fund may be allowed to accumulate in anticipation of any unforeseen expenses not included in the yearly maintenance costs. This may include, but is not limited to, tree replacements, repair of damaged equipment due to vandalism, storms and other similar events. Landscape Maintenance District No. 10 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 10 Fiscal Year 2011/12 P328 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT General Pursuant to the 1972 Act and Article XIII D, all parcels that have a special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements and services shall be identified, and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel shall be determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of improvements. The 1972 Act, permits the establishment of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include the operation, maintenance and servicing of landscaping improvements. Section 22573 of the 1972 Act requires that maintenance assessments must be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. This Section states: "The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district maybe apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements." The determination of whether or not a lot or parcel will benefit from the improvements shall be made pursuant to the Improvement Act of 1911 (Division 7 (commencing with Section 5000) (of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California]." The 1972 Act also permits the designation of zones of benefit within any individual assessment district if "by reasons or variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive different degrees of benefit from the improvement" (Sec. 22547). Article XIII D, Section 4(a) of the California Constitution limits the amount of any assessment to the proportional special benefit conferred on the property. Article XIII D also provides that publicly owned properties must be assessed unless there is clear and convincing evidence that those properties receive no special benefit from the assessment. Exempted from the assessment would be the areas of public streets, public avenues, public lanes, public roads, public drives, public courts, public alleys, public easements and rights-of-ways, public greenbelts and public parkways. The net amount to be assessed may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels. Proposition 218, approved by the voters in November 1996, requires the City to separate general benefit from special benefit, where only special benefit is assessed. Benefit The maintenance and servicing of the improvements within the District (which are described in the Description of Improvements and Services Section of this report) are for the benefit of the properties within the District, and as such confer a special and direct benefit to parcels within the District by: improving the livability, appearance, and desirability for properties within the boundaries of the District, and ensuring that improvements do not reach a state of deterioration or disrepair so as to be materially detrimental to properties within the District, and Landscape Maintenance District No. 10 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 11 Fiscal Year 2011 /12 P329 • providing beautification, shade and overall enhancement to properties within the District. The above mentioned items affect the assessed property in a way that is particular and distinct from their effect on other parcels and that real property in general and the public at large do not share. They contribute to a specific enhancement of the properties within the District. Since these improvements, including the community trails, were installed and are maintained specifically for the properties within the District; only properties within the District receive a special benefit and are assessed for said maintenance. General Benefit In addition to the special benefits received by parcels within the District, there are derivative general benefits that are conferred on parcels outside the boundaries of the District which include: • the control of dust and insect infestations, and • the visual enhancement of the area to persons or vehicles that may travel through the District. However it has been determined that these benefits are derivative and do not provide a direct benefit to parcels outside of the district that are not being assessed. Method of Assessment Spread Each of the parcels within the District is deemed to receive special benefit from the improvements. Each parcel that has a special benefit conferred upon it as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements are identified and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel is determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of the improvements. To assess special benefit appropriately, it is necessary to relate the different type of parcel improvements to each other. The Equivalent Benefit Unit ("EBU") method of apportionment uses the single family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single family home equals one Equivalent Benefit Unit (EBU). Every other land-use is converted to EBUs based on an assessment formula that equates to the property's specific development status, type of development (land-use), and size of the property, as compared to a single family home. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land-use types, as assigned by County use code, to determine each parcel's EBU assignment. Land-Use Equivalent Dwelling Units Pro ert T e Coun Use Code EBU Value Multi lier Single Family Residential 1.00 Dwelling Unit The use of the latest County Assessor's Secured Roll shall be the basis for the Property Type determination and units/acreage assignments, unless better data is available to the City. In addition, if any parcel within the District is identified by the County Auditor/Controller to be an invalid parcel number for the current fiscal year, the Property Type and EBU assignment shall be based on the correct parcel number and/or new parcel number(s) County use code and subsequent property information. If a single parcel has changed to multiple parcels, the EBU assignment and assessment amount applied to each of the new parcels will be recalculated rather than spread the proportionate share of the original assessment. Landscape Maintenance District No. 10 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 12 Fiscal Year 2011/12 P330 The following table summarizes the Fiscal Year 2011/12 maximum allowable assessment rates for the District: Maximum Allowable Property Type Assessment Rate Actual Assessment Total Total (County Use Code) er EBU Rate per EBU Units/Acres EBUs Single Family Residential $771.79 $616.20 751 751 The total amount of maintenance and incidental costs for maintaining the landscaping and community trail improvements is assessed to the individual parcels of real property within the District in proportion to the special benefit received by such parcels of real property. The proposed individual assessments are shown on the assessment roll in this report. Maximum and Historical Assessments The maximum allowable assessment rate per EBU listed. above, is the amount which was approved in 2001/02, when the District was formed, and subsequent District annexations. Commencing in Fiscal Year 2002/03, the amount of the maximum allowable assessment is proposed to increase each year based upon the Consumer Price Index ("CPI"), All Urban Consumers, for the Los Angeles- Anaheim-San Bernardino Area, as determined by the United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics or its successor. Each year the percentage difference between the CPI for March of each year and the CPI for the previous March shall be computed. The assessment shall be adjusted by an amount not to exceed such percentage for the following fiscal year. Should the Bureau of Labor Statistics revise such index or discontinue preparation of such index, the revised index or a comparable system as approved by the City Council shall be used for determining fluctuations in the cost of living. Historical maximum assessment amounts and actual assessment amounts are shown in the table below: Fiscal Year Maximum Assessment er EBU Actual Assessment er EBU 2001/02 $597. 09 $597. 09 2002/03 613. 69 597. 09 2003/04 637. 75 597. 09 2004/05 648. 93 597. 09 2005/06 675. 03 597. 09 2006/07 706. 54 597. 09 2007/08 733. 65 616. 20 2008/09 757. 73 616. 20 2009110 757. 73 616. 20 2011/12 771. 79 616. 20 Landscape Maintenance District No. 10 -City of Rancho Cucamonga, 13 Fiscal Year 2011/12 P331 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM An Assessment Diagram for the District is shown on the following page. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the County Assessor of the County San Bernardino, at the time this report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Engineer's Report. Landscape Maintenance District No. 10 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 14 Fiscal Year 2011 /12 P332 Y.+ 'i ~F°1 •~ 0 V ~i~r •~ Q. V J ny ua~pl!W c y ny epuenn!33 ny ~a;sayooa ny uaneH ~- - i i ny esow~aH j-- --- i nV PIe9!4o~t/ ~ -- i ny uewllaH i -~- j ;g ue!lawe~ ~~ ..~ ~ C N T 'O C N LT1 S ~O _< __ oZ U -- ny iGaa4~ K N C _ J m ~ r 3 o m 0 li Q w ~_ o J ~ I ~_ C CJ ~ I ~ ~. J tir~ J 1se3 in L V' ® "' 0 0 N O ny epuenn43 ny ~a;sayooa ny ua~!II!W jny uaneH - _ i ny esow~aH i -~--_'n~ PIe9!4o~b' i y' ~ ny uewllaH ~~. ~ • L !' L ~ ny p~e%awn ., ~ C L J W ~ N f6 m j ~°ESees€=s~:°r _~~E ePFE€Eg~ / / ~ =~s~;£r 95 ~~ sEg:b" €E8p ~ ..~. J S y a CD R' ~ V Y >~FCI SC aS ~z L O a0 y "€~e os E ~ ~ Q o~: .~~Y.p7 c~ . f ~ s~c }~ a t. 'e$s~~s4z`F` :ey e45ag 6F:1 °6~ g ela r z ~H ~>¢ ~Et~ & go~rPBj ~ ~ S PS 8$~•EO~E S~•E aa~~.es;a•g~ Sssg°.~E4E°.g Sg~~ ` ~- Fg-~ v ~d~o n°~~fs'c :t P333 ASSESSMENT ROLL Assessment Roll The assessment roll is a listing of the assessment for Fiscal Year 2011/12 apportioned to each lot or parcel, as shown on the last equalized roll of the Assessor of the County of San Bernardino. The following tables summarize the Fiscal Year 2011/12 maximum and actual assessments for the District: Maximum Allowable Maximum Property Type Assessment Rate Total Total Allowable Coun Use Code er EBU Units/Acres EBUs Assessment Single Family Residential $771.79 751.00 751.00 $579,614.29 Actual Property Type Assessment Rate Total Total Actual Coun Use Code er EBU Units/Acres EBUs Assessment Single Family Residential $616.20 751.00 751.00 $462,766.20 A copy of the full assessment roll is available for review in the City Clerk's office. Annexations There were no annexations effective for the 2011/12 Fiscal Year. Landscape Maintenance District No. 10 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 15 Fiscal Year 2011/12 This Staff Report replaces Agenda pages P116 through P333. STAFF REPORT - ADMINISTR~ITIVE SERVICES DEP~1R"I'bfENT RANCHO Date: August 3, 2011 CUCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager From: John R. Gillison, Assistant City Manage By: Ingrid Y. Bruce, GIS/Special Districts Manager Subject: CONSIDERATION TO APPROVE THE RESOLUTION CONFIRMING THE DIAGRAMS AND ASSESSMENTS APPROVE THE ANNUAL ENGINEER'S REPORTS, AND ORDER THE LEVY AND COLLECTION OF ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS FOR LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO'S. 1, 3A, 3B, 4-R, 5, 7, 8, 9 AND 10 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2011/2012. NO INCREASE OF THE ASSESSMENT RATE IS PROPOSED. It is recommended that the City Council approve the Resolution confirming the Diagrams and Assessments, approve the Annual Engineer's Reports, and order the levy and collection of assessments within Landscape Maintenance District No's. 1, 3A, 36, 4-R, 5, 7, 8, 9 and 10. There is no increase to the current rates in these districts proposed for Fiscal Year 2011/2012. The Engineer's Reports are on file in the City Clerk's Office. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Each year, per the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972, the City is required to hold a public hearing to receive public comment on the levy and collection of assessments within Landscape Maintenance (LMD) No's. 1, 3A, 3B, 4-R, 5, 7, 8, 9 and 10 (each a "District" and collectively the "Districts'). This requirement must be accomplished before the City can submit the annual assessments for placement on the County Tax Roll. The following, along with reference to the Engineer's Reports for the Districts, identifies proposed Fiscal Year 2011/2012 assessment rates. The Engineer's Reports identify the required budget for each of the Districts, including the surplus, if any, remaining in the fund balance for any District. It has been determined, as stated in the Landscape Maintenance District's Fiscal Year 2011/2012 Engineer's Reports, that the assessment rates remain unchanged from the previous Fiscal Year 2010/2011's rates. The Fiscal Year 2011 /2012 budget for each District is: LMD 1 Budgeted Expenses - $1,448,840.00 CONSIDERATION'f0 AEEROVE'I'I-Ili RL;SOLU'fION I~OR LANDSCAI'li MAINTENANCE DIS'IRIC'I' NO'S. 1, 3A, 3B, 4-R, 5, 7, 8, 9 AND 10. AUGUST 3, 2011 PAGE 2 _ Estimated assessment revenues including delinquencies - $1,119,480.00 The deficit of $329,360.00 will be made up from operating reserves. operating reserve balance down to $408,970.00. At the current level necessary to bring the District for a Prop 218 Assessment Ballot proces reduce expenses to stay within revenues. LMD 3A Budgeted Expenses - $4,840.00 Estimated assessment revenues including delinquencies - $4,240.00 The deficit of $600.00 will be made up from operating reserves. LMD 36 Budgeted Expenses - $1,372,220.00 Estimated assessment revenues including delinquencies - $937,320.00 This will bring the current of expenditures it will be s in Calendar Year 2013 or The deficit of $434,900.00 will be made up from operating reserves. This will bring the current operating reserve balance down to $675,290.00. At the current level of expenditures it will be necessary to bring the District for a Prop 218 Assessment Ballot process in Calendar Year 2013 or reduce expenses to stay within revenues. LMD 4-R Budgeted Expenses - $2,419,000.00 Estimated assessment revenues including delinquencies - $2,378,870.00 The deficit of $40,130.00 will be made up from operating reserves operating reserve balance down to $1,954,540.00. LMD 5 Budgeted Expenses - $4,060.00 Estimated assessment revenues including delinquencies - $6,050.00. LMD 7 This will bring the current Budgeted Expenses - $939,630.00 CONSIDI',RATION TO AhPROVI?'1'lil? KI?tiOLUTION I~OR LANUSCAI'li IvL1IN77NANCL" DISIRICP NO'S. 1, 3A, 3B, 4-R, 5, 7, S, 9 nNU 10. . AUGUST 3, 2011 PAGIr. 3 Estimated assessment revenues including delinquencies - $802,140.00 The deficit of $137,490.00 will be made up from operating reserves. This will bring the current operating reserve balance down to $777,150.00. At the current level of expenditures it will be necessary to bring the District for a Prop 218 Assessment Ballot process in Calendar Year 2013 or reduce expenses to stay within revenues. LMD 8 Budgeted Expenses - $26,030.00 Estimated assessment revenues including delinquencies - $28,620.00 LMD 9 Budgeted Expenses - $698,360.00 Estimated assessment revenues including delinquencies - $380,500.00 The deficit of $317,860.00 will be made up from operating reserves. LMD 10 Budgeted Expenses - $618,100.00 Estimated assessment revenues including delinquencies - $433,750.00 The deficit of $114,170.00 will be made up from operating reserves. The assessment rates and Districts description for each of the Landscape Maintenance Districts are as follows: Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 assessments pay for the on-going maintenance of parkways. The current assessment rate is $92.21 per single-family residence, and the multi-family rate is $46.11 per dwelling unit. Landscape Maintenance District No. 3A assessments pay for the on-going maintenance of parkways on Hyssop Drive. The current assessment rate is $413.74 per acre for commercial property. Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B assessments pay for the on-going maintenance of parkways within the commercial and industrial area of the City. The current assessment rate is $352.80 per acre for commercial property. CONSIDI3RA'I'ION "1'O AI'I'ROVI? "1'I~IIi RI?SOLU"PION I+OR Le\NUSCAI'I''. MAIN"I'I~.NANCI? DISIRI(°I' NO'S. 1, 3A, 3B, 4R, 5, 7, s, 9 nNI~ 10. AUGUST' 3, 2011 PAGIi 4 Landscape Maintenance District No. 4-R assessments pay for the on-going maintenance of parkways, paseos and parks within the Terra Vista Planned Community. The current assessment rate is $380.00 per single-family residence, the condominium rate is $304.00 per dwelling unit, and the multi-family rate is $266.00 per dwelling unit. The commercial rate is $1,235.00 per acre, and the vacant rate is $95.00 per acre. Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 assessments pay for the on-going maintenance of a Tot Lot located on the southwest corner of Andover Place and Bedford Drive. The current assessment rate is $113.29 per single-family residence. Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 assessments pay for the on-going maintenance of parkways and paseos within the Etiwanda Highlands Community. The current assessment rate is $307.05 per single-family residence. Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 assessments pay for the on-going maintenance of parkways in South Etiwanda. The current assessment rate is $151.45 per single-family residence. Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 assessments pay for the on-going maintenance of parkways in South Etiwanda. The current assessment rate is $187.00 per single-family residence. Landscape Maintenance District No. 10 assessments pay for the on-going maintenance of parkways in the future University Crest Project. The current assessment rate is $616.20 per single- family residence and $1,232.40 per acre for commercial property. Attachments Resolution Engineer's Reports RESOLUTION NO. ~ ~' /3 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONFIRMING THE DIAGRAMS AND ASSESSMENTS, APPROVING THE ANNUAL ENGINEER'S REPORTS AND ORDERING THE LEVY AND COLLECTION OF THE ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS WITHIN LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO'S. 1, 3A, 3B, 4-R, 5, 7, 8, 9 AND 10 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2011/2012. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga did on the 6th day of July, 2011, adopt its Resolution of Intention No. 11-098 (the "Resolution of Intention") pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, as amended (the "1972 Act"), declaring its intention to levy and collect assessments within Landscape Maintenance Districts Nos. 1, 3A, 3B, 4-R, 5, 6-R and 7 through 10, inclusive (each a "District" and collectively the "Districts") for Fiscal Year 2011/2012 and giving notice of the time and place for a public hearing by the City Council on the levy of the proposed assessments within the Districts; and WHEREAS, the City Council previously received and preliminarily approved a report of the Assessment Engineer (each an "Annual Engineer's Report" and collectively the "Annual Engineer's Reports") for each District as required pursuant to Article 4 of Chapter 1 of the 1972 Act, Article XIIID of the Constitution of the State of California ("Article XIIID") and the Proposition 218 Omnibus Implementation Act (Government Code Section 53750 and following) (the "Implementation Act") (the 1972 Act, Article XIIID and the Implementation Act are referred to collectively as the "Assessment LavW'); and WHEREAS, subsequent to the preliminary approval of the Annual Engineer's Reports, the Assessment Engineer revised each of the Annual Engineer's Reports (each a "Revised Annual Engineer's Report" and collectively the "Revised Annual Engineer's Reports") to add to such reports information regarding the annexations, if any, to each applicable District during Fiscal Year 2011-2012 and to make certain other insubstantial formatting revisions to the summary of assessments and the District budgets that did not result in an increase of the expenditure budget for the Districts, or any one of them, or the aggregate assessments or any individual assessment proposed to be levied within the Districts, or any one, of them; and WHEREAS, notice of such public hearing was duly and legally published in the time, form and manner as required by the Assessment Law, shown by the affidavit of Publication of said Resolution of Intention on file in the Office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, said City Council having duly received and considered evidence, oral and documentary, concerning the jurisdiction facts in this proceeding and concerning the necessity for the contemplated work and the benefits to be derived therefrom, and said City Council having now acquired jurisdiction to order the proposed work. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, DETERMINED AND ORDERED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, as follows: SECTION 1. This City Council hereby finds and determines that: a. notice of the public hearing has been given and the proceedings for the consideration of the levy of the annual assessments within each District have been undertaken in accordance with the 1972 Act; and b. the annual assessments for Fiscal Year 2011/2012 proposed to be levied within each District as set forth in the applicable Revised Annual Engineer's Report do not exceed the annual assessments as previously authorized to be levied within such District, and therefore, the proposed levy of assessments for Fiscal Year 2011/2012 within such District are not deemed to be "increased" over the maximum authorized annual assessments. SECTION 2. The final assessments and diagrams for the proceedings, as contained in the Revised Annual Engineer's Report for each of the Districts, is hereby approved and confirmed. The assessments for the Districts contained in the Revised Annual Engineer's Reports for Fiscal Year 2011/2012 are hereby levied upon the respective lots or parcels in the Districts in the amounts as set forth in the applicable Revised Annual Engineer's Report. SECTION 3. This City Council hereby orders that the work, as set forth and described in the Resolution of Intention, be done and made. SECTION 4. The above-referenced diagram and assessment shall be filed in the Office of the City Clerk. Said diagram and assessment, and the certified copy thereof, shall be open for public inspection. SECTION 5. The City Clerk is hereby ordered and directed to immediately file a certified copy of the diagram and assessment with the County Auditor. Such filing shall be made no later than the 3rd Monday in August 2011. SECTION 6. After the filing of the diagram and assessment, the County Auditor shall enter on the County assessment roll opposite each lot or parcel of land the amount assessed thereupon, as shown in the assessment. SECTION 7. The assessments shall be collected at the same time and in the same manner as County taxes are collected, and all laws providing for the collection and enforcement of County taxes shall apply to the collection and enforcement of the assessments. SECTION 8. The assessments as above confirmed and levied for these proceedings will provide revenue and relate to the fiscal year commencing July 1, 2011 and ending June 30, 2012. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of August, 2011. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: L. Dennis Michael, Mayor ATTEST: Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk I, Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of said City Council held on 2011. Executed this , at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2011/2012 City of Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 (General City) CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (GENERAL CITY) 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Phone: 909.477.2740 Fax: 909.477.2741 CITY COUNCIL L. Dennis Michael, Mayor Sam Spagnolo, Mayor Pro Tem William Alexander, Council Member Chuck Buquet, Council Member Diane Williams, Council Member CITY STAFF John R. Gillison, Assistant City Manager Linda D. Daniels, Deputy City Manager William Wittkopf, Public Works Director Ingrid Y. Bruce, GIS/Special Districts Manager Christopher Bopko, Management Analyst III TABLE OF CONTENTS ENGINEER'S LETTER INTRODUCTION 3 Reason for Assessment .............................................................................................3 Process for Annual Assessment .................................................................................3 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS 5 Description of the Boundaries of the District ...............................................................5 Description of Improvements and Services ................................................................5 Map of Improvements ...............................................................................................16 ESTIMATE OF COSTS 17 District Budget ..........................................................................................................17 Definitions of Budget Items .......................................................................................18 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT 20 General ............................................................................ ......................................... 20 Special Benefit ................................................................ .........................................20 General Benefit ............................................................... .........................................21 Method of Assessment Spread ....................................... .........................................21 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM ASSESSMENT ROLL 23 24 Assessment Roll .......................................................................................................24 Annexations .............................................................................................................. 24 ENGINEER'S LETTER WHEREAS, on July 6, 2011, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 (the "1972 Act") adopted its Resolution No. 11-098, a Resolution Initiating Proceedings for the Levy of Annual Assessments for Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 (General City) (the "District"); and WHEREAS, the Resolution Initiating Proceedings directed staff to prepare and file an Engineer's Report for Fiscal Year 2011/12 pursuant to the requirements of the 1972 Act. The Engineer's Report presents the plans and specifications describing the general nature, location and extent of the improvements to be maintained, an estimate of the costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements for the District for the referenced fiscal year, a diagram for the District, showing the area and properties proposed to be assessed, and an assessment of the estimated costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing the improvements, assessing the net amount upon all assessable lots and/or parcels within the District in proportion to the special benefit received; and NOW THEREFORE, the following assessment is proposed to be authorized in order to pay the estimated costs of maintenance, operation and servicing of the improvements to be paid by the assessable real property within the boundaries of the District in proportion to the special benefit received. The following table summarizes the proposed assessment. SUMMARY OF ASSESSMENT Fiscal Year 2011/12 Total Estimated Assessment $1,189,880.00 Less Anticipated Delinquencies (70.400.001 Total Estimated Revenue $1,119,480.00 Plus Reserve Fund Contribution 329.360.00 Total Expenditure Budget $1,448,840.00 Total District EBU Count 12,903.46 Actual Assessment per EBU $92.21 Maximum Allowable Assessment per EBU $92.21 In making the assessments contained herein pursuant to the 1972 Act: I have identified all parcels which will have a special benefit conferred upon them from the improvements described in the Special Benefit Section of this Engineer's Report (the "Specially Benefited Parcels"). For particulars as to the identification of said parcels, reference is made to the Assessment Diagram, a copy of which is included in this Engineer's Report. 2. I have evaluated the costs and expenses of the improvements upon the Specially Benefited Parcels. In making such evaluation: Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2011/12 a. The proportionate special benefit derived by each Specially Benefited Parcel from the improvements was determined in relationship to the entirety of the maintenance costs of the improvements; b. No assessment has been imposed on any Specially Benefited Parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on such parcel from the improvements; and c. Any general benefits from the improvements have been separated from the special benefits and only special benefits have been assessed. I, the undersigned, respectfully submit the enclosed Engineer's Report and, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, the Engineer's Report, Assessments, and the Assessment Diagram herein have been prepared and computed in accordance with the order of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Assessment Law. of Engineering Services/City Engineer Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2011 /12 INTRODUCTION Reason for Assessment Approval of the assessment covered by this Engineer's Report will generate the revenue necessary to: Provide for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements described in this Engineer's Report. Maintenance may include but is not limited to, all of the following: the repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement, providing for the life, growth, health and beauty of the landscaping, including cultivation, irrigation, trimming, spraying, fertilizing or treating for disease or injury, the removal of trimming, rubbish, debris and other solid waste, the maintenance, repair and replacement as necessary of all irrigation systems and the removal of graffiti from walls immediately adjacent to the cultivated areas. Servicing means the furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operating and servicing of any improvement. Servicing shall also include vehicle, equipment, capital improvements and administrative costs associated with the annual administration and operation of the District. Process for Annual Assessment The City cannot levy and collect annual assessments within the District without complying with the procedures specified in the 1972 Act. On an annual basis, an Engineer's Report must be prepared which contains a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the district. The City Council must also adopt a resolution of intention which: • Declares the intention of the City Council to levy and collect assessments within the assessment district for the fiscal year stated therein. • Generally describes the existing and proposed improvements and any substantial changes proposed to be made in existing improvements. • Refers to the assessment district by its distinctive designation and indicate the general location of the district. • Refers to the report of the engineer, on file with the clerk, for a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the district. • Gives notice of the time and place far public hearing by the City Council on the levy of the proposed assessment. • States whether the assessment is proposed to increase from the previous year. If the assessments are to be levied in the same or lesser amounts than the maximum assessment amount approved, the clerk shall give notice by causing the resolution of intention to be published. Any interested person may, prior to the conclusion of the public hearing, file a written protest which shall state all grounds of objection. The protest shall contain a description sufficient to identify the property owned by the property owner filing the protest. During the course or upon conclusion of the hearing, the City Council may order changes in any of the matters provided in the report, including changes in the improvements, any zones within the assessment district, and the proposed diagram or the proposed assessment. The City Council, upon conclusion of the public hearing must then adopt a resolution confirming the diagram and assessment, either as originally proposed or as changed by it. The adoption of the resolution shall constitute the levy of an assessment for the fiscal year referred to in the assessment. Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2011/12 If the assessment to be levied exceeds the maximum assessment amount previously approved, the City must comply with the procedures specified in Article XIII D and Proposition 218. The voters in the State of California in November 1996 added Article XIII D to the California Constitution imposing, among other requirements, the necessity for the City to conduct an assessment ballot procedure to enable the owners of each property on which assessments are proposed to be enacted or increased, the opportunity to express their support for, or opposition to the proposed assessment or increase in such assessment. The basic steps of the assessment ballot procedure are outlined below. The City must prepare a Notice of Public Hearing ("Notice"), which describes, along with other mandated information, the reason for the proposed assessments, and to provide a date and time of a public hearing to be held on the matter. The City must also prepare an assessment ballot, which clearly gives the property owner the ability to sign and mark their assessment ballot either in favor of, or in opposition to the proposed assessment. The Notice and assessment ballot are mailed to each affected property owner within the District a minimum of 45 days prior to the public hearing date as shown in the Notice. The City may also hold community meetings with the property owners to discuss the issues facing the District and to answer property owner questions directly. After the Notice and assessment ballot are mailed, property owners are given until the close of the public hearing, stated in the Notice, to return their signed and marked assessment ballot. During the public hearing, property owners are given the opportunity to address the City Council and ask questions or voice their concerns. At the public hearing, the returned assessment ballots received prior to the close of the public hearing are tabulated, weighted by the proposed assessment amount on each property and the results are announced by the City Council. Article XIII D provides that if, as a result of the assessment ballot proceeding, a majority protest is found to exist, the City Council shall not have the authority to levy and collect the assessments as proposed. A majority protest exists if the assessments represented by ballots submitted in opposition exceed those submitted in favor of the assessment. All returned ballots are tabulated and weighted according to the financial obligation of each particular parcel. If there is no majority protest as described above, the City Council may approve the proposed assessments. If there is a majority protest, as described above, the City will not levy and collect any assessments. Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2011/12 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS The District provides for the administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing of various improvements located within the public right-of-way and dedicated easements within the boundaries of the District. Description of the Boundaries of the District The District is located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California. The boundaries of the District are generally described as that area of the City which is not located within the City's planned development communities. The District is made up of various landscaped sites throughout the City. As such, the parcels within the District do not represent a distinct district area as do the other LMDs within the City. Typically parcels have been annexed to the District as they have developed. Reference is also made to the Assessment Diagram included in this Report. Description of Improvements and Services The improvements are the maintenance and servicing of landscaping sites and appurtenant facilities throughout the District. The various landscaping sites that are maintained consist of parkways, median islands; street trees, paseos and community trails located within street right-of-ways and dedicated public easements which are within the boundaries of the District. The landscaping maintenance includes, but is not limited to, shrubs, turt, tree trimming in irrigated City parkways and paseos, weed and pest control, landscape irrigation systems and testing, trash, debris and graffiti removal, and associated appurtenant facilities. Services include personnel, materials, contracting services, utilities, and all necessary costs associated with the maintenance, replacement and repair required to keep the improvements in a healthy, vigorous and satisfactory condition. In addition, it is the City's intention to continue to use cost effective materials, including the future ability to replace landscaping with drought resistant or low water use plants, in order to lower expenses of the District. The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows: Parks: Bear Gulch Park, East and West Beryl park, Old Town Park, Church Street Park, Golden Oaks Park, Hermosa Park, Lions Park, Napa Park, Don TiburcioTapia Park. Site # Descriptive Location A-1 The north and south side of Wilson from Hellman to Amethyst. Ground Cover area: 22,982 square feet Hardscape area: 5,694 square feet A-2 The east side of Hellman from 326 feet south of Pepperidge to 73 feet north of Pepperidge. Ground Cover area: 5,810 square feet Hardscape area: 1,600 square feet A-3 The south side of 19th Street from 62 feet east of Mayberry to 173 feet east of Mayberry. Ground Cover area: 1,680 square feet Hardscape area: 440 square feet A-4 The south side of Wilson from Amethyst to Archibald; the planters and cutouts on the west side of Archibald from Wilson to 105 feet south of Cottonwood. Ground Cover area: 5,625 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2011/12 A-5 The north and south side of Diamond Court from Klusman to Diamond Ave Ground Cover area: 3,143 square feet Hardscape area: 1,864 square feet A-6 The parkway on the n orth side of Wilson from 348 feet east of Morning Canyon to Alder Ridge. Ground Cover area: 5,700 square feet Hardscape area: 4,760 square feet A-7 The cutouts and vines on the south side of Wilson from the Alta Loma Channel to 240 feet east of Zapata. Ground Cover area: 911 square feet A-8 The east side of Broken Star from 80' south of Highland to Highland; the north side of Highland from Amethyst to Broken Star including wood chip area north of sidewalk, the south side of Highland from Broken Star to Amethyst; the west side of Amethyst from 140 feet south of Highland to 265 feet south of Highland. Ground Cover area: 6,545 square feet Hardscape area: 2,554 square feet Mulchscape area: 14,005 square feet A-9 The south side of Highland from Hellman to Broken Star. Ground Cover area: 7,865 square feet A-10 The south side of 19th from 170 feet west of Pilgrim to 167 feet east of Pilgrim Grcund Cover area: 1,808 square feet Hardscape area: 1,084 square feet A-11 The east side of Amethyst from Lemon to 230 feet north of Apricot Ground Cover area: 2,115 square feet Hardscape area: 3,438 square feet A-12 The west side of Sapphire from 710 feet north of Hillside to Hillside. Ground Cover area: 4,500 square feet A-13 The south side of Victoria from 110 feet west of London to Ramona. Ground Cover area: 2,705 square feet Hardscape area: 3,480 square feet A-14 The west side of Archibald from 273 feet north of La Gloria to Lemon; the La Gloria median from Archibald to Jadeite; the north and south side of La Gloria from Archibald to 53 feet east of Jadeite; the north side of Lemon from Archibald to 55 feet east of Klusman. Ground Cover area: 12,880 square feet Hardscape area: 12,030 square feet A-15 The planters and cutouts on the east side of Archibald from 610 feet south of Cottonwood to Wilson; the south side of Wilson from Archibald to Alta Loma Channel. Ground Cover area: 2,110 square feet A-16 The cutouts and planters on the east side of Archibald from Banyan to 190 feet north of Sunflower. Ground Cover area: 1,580 square feet A-17 The cutouts and planters on the west side of Archibald from 225 feet south of Wilson to Banyan. Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2011/12 Ground Cover area: 2,362 square feet A-18 The cutouts and planters on the north side of Banyan from Jadeite to 410 feet west of Jadeite. Ground Cover area: 216 square feet A-19 The cutouts and planters on the east side of Amethyst from 192 feet south of Sunflower to Manzanita. Ground Cover area: 4,325 square feet A-20 The west side of Archibald from 210 feet north of La Colina to 230 feet south of Almond; the south side of La Colina from Archibald to Jadeite. Ground Cover area: 17,120 square feet A-21 The planter adjacent to the equestrian trail from Riverwood to Raspberry north of the County flood retention basin that is west of Chaffey College. Ground Cover area: 22,832 square feet A-22 The west side of Haven from Carrari to Vista Grove. Ground Cover area: 4,572 square feet A-23 The west side of Haven from 434 feet north of Manzanita to 258 feet south of Manzanita. Ground Cover area: 48,390 square feet Turf area: 5,868 square feet Hardscape area: 4,581 square feet A-24 The south side of 19th from 286 feet east of Amethyst to 166 feet west of Klusman. Ground Cover area: 5,904 square feet Hardscape area: 2,938 square feet A-25 The equestrian trail and planters on the east side of Hermosa from 421 feet south of Whispering Forest to Sun Valley. Ground Cover area: 17,529 square feet A-26 The west side of Haven from 630 feet north of Wilson to Wilson; the parkway on the north side of Wilson from Haven to Mayberry; the parkway on the east side of Mayberry from Wilson to 382 feet north of Poplar, and the east and west side of Cartilla from Wilson to Poplar. Ground Cover area: 10,243 square feet Mulchscape area: 25,297 square feet A-27 The north side of 19th from Mayberry to 93 feet east of Castle Gate. Ground Cover area: 5,145 square feet Hardscape area: 2,870 square feet A-28 The east side of Hermosa from 360 feet south of Manzanita to Manzanita, and the south side of Manzanita from Hermosa to Raspberry. Ground Cover area: 7,421 square feet Hardscape area: 4,712 square feet A-29 The south side of Wilson from 240 feet west of Timbermist to Hermosa; the west side of Hermosa from Wilson to 213 feet south of Oak Grove. Ground Cover area: 11,184 square feet A-30 The equestrian trail and plant material from the curb to the tract wall on the west side of Hermosa from 118 feet south of Hillside to 160 feet south of Waterford. Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 7 Fiscal Year 2011 /12 Ground Cover area: 12,132 square feet A-31 The south side of Lemon from London to Calle Hermosa. Ground Cover area: 4,404 square feet Hardscape area: 1,800 square feet A-32 The north side of Lemon from.the Alta Loma Channel to London; the east side of London from Lemon to Cypress. Ground Cover area: 4,463 square feet Hardscape area: 3,375 square feet A-33 The parkway on the east side of London from 158 feet north of Banyan to 310 feet north of Banyan. Ground Cover area: 1,029 square feet Hardscape area: 1,160 square feet A-34 The south side of Alta Loma from Mayberry to Revere. Ground Cover area: 2,772 square feet Note: 1,512 square feet of ground cover deleted from this site on 7-00. A-35 The west side of Hermosa from Lemon to 125 feet north of Highland, the parkway on the south side of Lemon from 621 feet west of Hermosa to Hermosa. Ground Cover area: 10,494 square feet Hardscape area: 9,207 square feet Mulchscape area: 2,370 square feet A-36 The south side of Lemon from 385 feet west of Mayberry to Cartilla. Ground Cover area: 4,850 square feet Hardscape area: 4,915 square feet A-37 The south side of Hillside north and south of the equestrian trail from Beryl to 203 feet east of Eastwood. Ground Cover area: 4,900 square feet A-38 The median in the 9200 block of Monte Vista Ground Cover area: 500 square feet Hardscape area: 1,800 square feet A-39 The south side of Almond from Henry to Sapphire; the west side of Sapphire from Almond to 255 feet south of Bella Vista. Ground Cover area: 6,926'square feet A-40 The parkway on the east side of Jasper from Hunter to Highland; the parkway on the south side of Highland from Jasper to Carnelian; the west side of Carnelian from Highland to 210 feet south of Highland. Ground Cover area: 14,858 square feet Hardscape area: 6,040 square feet A-41 The west side of Sapphire from 236 feet north of Thoroughbred to Banyan. Ground Cover area: 1,784 square feet Hardscape area: 812 square feet A-42 The parkway on the west side of Beryl from 132 feet north of Sunflower to 23 feet north of Sunflower; and from Sunflower to Banyan. Ground Cover area: 4,735 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2011/12 Hardscape area: 5,772 square feet A-43 The north side of Base Line from Topaz to the Cucamonga Creek Channel. Ground Cover area: 4,563 square feet Hardscape area: 1,890 square feet A-44 The cutouts on the west side of Sapphire from Banyan to Marble. Ground Cover area: 7,300 square feet A-45 The mainline for this site was connected to A-46 9-8-99. A-46 The south side of Banyan from North star to Zircon. Ground Cover area: 7,448 square feet Hardscape area: 7,890 square feet A-47 The cutouts and vines on the north side of Banyan from 180 feet east of Zircon to 186 feet west of Vineyard. Ground Cover area: 1,300 square feet A-48 The parkway on the west side of Beryl from 452 feet north of Cielito; 158 feet south of Cielito and the easement between 9063 and 9073 Cielito from Cielito to 170 feet south of Cielito. Ground Cover area: 6,916 square feet Hardscape area: 2,440 square feet A-49 The east side of Carnelian from 662 feet south of Banyan to Banyan; the south side of Banyan from Carnelian to Northstar. Ground Cover area: 5,906 square feet Hardscape area: 6,972 square feet A-50 The north side of Almond from Sapphire to Crest View; the east and west side of Skyline from Almond to 595 feet north of Almond. Ground Cover area: 17,600 square feet Hardscape area: 8,680 square feet A-51 The planter adjacent to the equestrian trail; from Haven to Riverwood, north of County flood retention basin, west of Chaffey College. The west side of Haven from 400 feet north of Amber to 270 feet south of Amber. Ground Cover area: 37,977 square feet Hardscape area: 5,458 square feet A-52 The east side of Riverwood, from 188 feet south of Charwood to 193 feet north of Charwood. Ground Cover area: 2,750 square feet Hardscape area: 1,698 square feet A-53 The west side of Jasper from Hunter to Highland. The south side of Highland from Jasper to 308 feet west of Sard. The east and westside of Sard from Highland to Hunter. Ground Cover area: 7,445 square feet Hardscape area: 4,740 square feet A-54 The west side of Beryl from 233 feet north of Mignonette to Mignonette. Ground Cover area: 2,637 square feet Hardscape area: 932 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2011/12 A-55 The north side of 19'" from Cartilla to Mayberry. The east side of Mayberry from 19'" to Heather. Ground Cover area: 8,410 square feet Hardscape area: 5,060 square feet A-56 The east side of Beryl from 410 feet north of Wilson to Wilson The north side of Wilson from Beryl to 731 feet west of Buckthorn. The south side of Wilson from Buckthorn to Beryl. Ground Cover area: 19,708 square feet Hardscape area: 5,436 square feet A-57 The east side of Hermosa From 115 north of Coca To 451 feet north of Coca. The trail north of water retention basin from Hermosa to 619 feet east of Hermosa. Ground Cover area: 9,406 square feet Hardscape area: 6,794 square feet A-58 The west side of Haven from 510 feet south of Victoria to 1005 feet south of Victoria. Ground Cover area: 7,301 square feet Hardscape area: 4,790 square feet A-59 The east side of Archibald from 820 feet south of Lemon to 448 feet south of Lemon and continues from 275 feet south of Lemon to 185 feet south of Lemon. Ground Cover area: 4,777 square feet Hardscape area: 5,041 square feet A-60 The south side of Lemon from 290 feet east of Archibald to London. The West side of London from Lemon to Orange. Ground Cover area: 2,569 square feet Hardscape area: 4,122 square feet A-61 The north side of Carrari from Archibald to London. Ground Cover area: 25,152 square feet Hardscape area: 1,698 square feet A-62 The east side of Archibald from Carrari to 505 feet north of Meadowood. Ground Cover area: 8,626 square feet Hardscape area: 1,824 square feet A-63 The south side of Almond street from Carriage to Almond Ground Cover area: 3,342 square feet Hardscape area: 3,600 square feet A-64 The east side of Beryl from Cottonwood to Wilson. The south side of Wilson from Beryl to 437 feet east of Beryl. The north side of Wilson from Cousins to 474 feet east of Cousins. Ground Cover area: 11,973 square feet Hardscape area: 9,949 square feet A-65 The east side of Archibald from LaGloria to 328 feet north of LaGloria. Ground Cover area: 2,279 square feet Hardscape area: 2,411 square feet A-66 The east side of Hermosa from Waterford to 500 feet north of Waterford. Ground Cover area: 4,695 square feet Hardscape area: 5,947 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 10 Fiscal Year 2011/12 A-67 The south side of 19'" from 220 feet east of Sapphire to Via Serena. Ground Cover area: 3,208 Square feet Hardscape area: 4,158 square feet A-68 The west side of Haven from Hillside to 783 feet south of Hillside. Ground cover area: 3,492 square feet A-69 The north side of Hillside from 27 feet west of Mayberry to 191 feet west of Mayberry. Ground Cover area: 1,002 square feet Hardscape area: 1,605 square feet A-70 The south side of 19`h from 365 feet west of Amethyst to Amethyst. The west side of Amethyst from 19`" to Hedges. Ground Cover area: 6,435 square feet Hardscape area: 7,015 square feet A-71 The west side of Archibald from Hillside to Wilson Avenue. The north side of Wilson, south of the trail fence area from Archibald to 467 feet west of Archibald. Ground Cover area: 9,265 square feet Hardscape area: 2,609 square feet A-72 The south side of Banyan from 420 feet west of Archibald to Archibald. The west side of Archibald from Banyan to 389 feet south of Banyan. Ground cover area: 10,270 square feet Hardscape area: 6,673 square feet A-73 The west side of Beryl from 300 feet north of San Simeon Drive tc 130 feet north of San Simeon Drive. Ground Cover area: 1,200 square feet Hardscape area: 600 square feet A-74 The south side of Highland Ave. from Beryl St. to Hellman Ave. Ground cover area: 11,603 square feet A-75 The south side of Highland Ave. from Amethyst St. to 612 feet east of Archibald Ave. Ground cover area: 106,409 square feet Hardscape area: 60,608 square feet A-76 The west side of Archibald from 635 feet north of Hillside to Hillside. The north side of Hillside from Archibald to 770 feet west of Archibald. Ground cover area: 8,859 square feet Hardscape area: 1,389 square feet A-77 The east side of Carnelian from Brilliant Ln. to Wilson including the irrigation cut-outs along trail. The south side of Wilson from Carnelian to 745 feet east of Arabian Dr. The irrigation cut-outs on the north side of Wilson from Carnelian to 775 feet east of Arabian Dr. Ground cover area: 5,101 square feet Hardscape area: 11,322 square feet B-1 The median on Blue Gum from Etiwanda to Blue Gum Court. Ground Cover area: 5,100 square feet B-2 The north side of 19th from Highland to Palm; the west and east side of Alameda from 19th to Ring; the east side of Palm from 19th to Ring. Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 11 Fiscal Year 2011 /12 Ground Cover area: 47,397 square feet Hardscape area: 26,285 square feet B-3 The paseo from Sutter Ct. to Deer Creek Channel. Ground Cover area: 294 square feet Hardscape area: 400 square feet B-4 The north side of Banyan from Deer Creek Channel to 355 feet west of Fredericksburg. Ground Cover area: 9,200 square feet Hardscape area: 3,834 square feet B-5 The north side of Lemon from Semillion to 188 feet west of Terracing. Ground Cover area: 14,472 square feet Hardscape area: 3,894 square feet B-6 The north side of Lemon from Barsac to Semillion. Ground Cover area: 15,784 square feet Hardscape area: 3,780 square feet B-7 The south side of Banyan from Cabernet to 414 feet east of Cabernet. Ground Cover area: 18,814 square feet B-8 The south side of Banyan from Callaway to Muscat. Ground Cover area: 10,505 square feet B-9 The east side of Haven from Banyan to 240 feet north of Banyan; the north side of Banyan from Haven to Merlot. Ground Cover area: 24,975 square feet Hardscape area: 1,356 square feet B-10 The east side of Haven from 400 feet south of Banyan to Banyan; the south side of Banyan from Haven to Callaway. Ground Cover area: 14,548 square feet Hardscape area: 6,348 square feet B-11 The south side of Banyan from Muscat to Cabernet. Ground Cover area: 33,282 square feet B-12 The north side of Lemon from Barsac to 135 feet east of Valinda. Ground Cover area: 13,464 square feet Hardscape area: 4,098 square feet B-13 The south side of 19th from Inyo to 585 feet east of San Benito; the parkways on the east and west side of San Benito from 19th to San Mateo; the east side of Inyo from 19th to paseo south of 19th and the paseo running east from Inyo to Sonora. Ground Cover area: 17,563 square feet Turf area: 3,387 square feet Hardscape area: 14,192 square feet B-14 The paseo from San Benito and Sonora to the Deer Creek Channel Ground Cover area: 2,000 square feet Hardscape area: 540 square feet B-15 The paseo from Stanislaus and Lavine to the Deer Creek Channel. Ground Cover area: 1,040 square feet Hardscape area: 428 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 12 Fiscal Year 2011112 B-16 The paseo from Inyo to Mendocino Ground Cover area: 225 square feet Hardscape area: 184 square feet B-17 The paseo from Yuba Ct. to Deer Creek Channel. Ground Cover area: 918 square feet Hardscape area: 420 square feet B-18 The south side of Wilson from 377 feet west of Canistel to 1032 feet east of Canistel. Ground Cover area: 6,762 square feet Hardscape area: 8,454 square feet B-19 The east side of Have n from the Southern Pacific Railroad to 341 feet south of Victoria. Ground Cover area: 6,415 square feet Hardscape area: 8,865 square feet B-20 The east side of Haven from 341 feet south of Victoria to Victoria; the south side of Victoria from Haven to 237 feet east of Mango. Ground Cover area: 16,900 square feet Hardscape area: 8,767 square feet B-21 The south side of 19th from Valinda to Inyo. Ground Cover area: 3,900 square feet Hardscape area: 3,700 square feet B-22 The south side of Lemon south of the sidewalk from 188 feet west of Terracina to 284 feet north of Marbella. The parkway on the south side of Lemon from 188 feet west of Terracina to 517 feet north of Marbella. The turf in the parkway at the end of the cul-de- sac on Sonterra Court. The parkway on the north side Lemon from 188 feet west of Terracina to 526 feet south of Terracina. The northside of Lemon north of the sidewalk from 188 feet west of Terracina to 562 feet south of Terracina. The turf in the parkway at the end of the cul-de-sac at Serena Street. Ground Cover area: 17,688 square feet Turf Area: 6,390 square feet Hardscape area: 4,928 square feet B-23 The parkway on the east side of Lemon from 129 feet south of Marbella to 526 feet south of Terracina. The slope On the east side of Lemon east of the sidewalk from 129 feet south of Marbella to 562 feet south of Terracina. The west side of Lemon west of the sidewalk from 284 feet north of Marbella to 129 feet south of Marbella. The parkway on the west side of Lemon from 517 feet north of Marbella to 129 feet south of Marbella. Ground Cover area: 22,531 square feet Hardscape area: 4,468 square feet Note _There was 11,844 square feet of ground cover deleted from this site 7-1-00. B-24 The south side of Highland from 327 feet west Deer Creek Channel to Deer Creek Channel. The paseo from Los Osos to Deer Creek Channel. Ground Cover area: 4,946 square feet Hardscape area: 2,099 square feet B-25 The south side of Banyan from 152 feet west of Cantabria to 930 feet east of Cantabria. Ground Cover area: 16,693 square feet. B-26 The north side of Wilson from 590 feet west of High Meadow Place to 187 feet east of High Meadow Place. Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 13 Fiscal Year 2011/12 Ground Cover area: 4,628 Square feet Hardscape area: 390 square feet B-27 The east side of Haven from 467 feet north of 19th St. to 650 feet north of 19th St. Ground cover area: 3,483 square feet Hardscape area: 6,235 square feet C-1 The north side of 26th from Andover to Hermosa; the east side of Hermosa from 26th to 331 feet north of Concord. Ground Cover area: 12,804 square feet Turf area: 9,423 square feet Hardscape area: 5,532 square feet C-2 The entry monument on the north east and northwest corners of 4th and Archibald. Ground Cover area: 5,860 square feet Turt area: 5,546 square feet Hardscape area: 1,842 square feet C-3 The south side of Base Line from Ramona to 128 feet east of Cambridge Ground Cover area: 17,262 square feet Hardscape area: 4,865 square feet C-4 The south side of Base Line from 440 feet west of Ramona to Ramona. Ground Cover area: 6,198 square feet Hardscape area: 2,200 square feet C-5 The south side of Base Line from 340 feet west of Center to 103 feet east of Center. Ground Cover area: 8,850 square feet Hardscape area: 2,215 square feet C-6 The south side of Base Line from Ivy to 105 feet west of Marine. Ground Cover area: 8,080 square feet Hardscape area: 2,475 square feet C-7 The parkway on the north side of Church from 142 feet east of Teak to 230 feet west of Teak. Ground Cover area: 1,813 square feet Hardscape area: 1,650 square feet C-8 The west side of Hermosa from 524 feet north of Palo Alto to 142 feet south of Palo Alto. Ground Cover area: 2,650 square feet Hardscape area: 3,996 square feet C-9 The parkway on the west side of Hermosa from 163 feet north of Ironwood to 145 feet south of Ironwood. Ground Cover area: 1,500 square feet Hardscape area: 1,848 square feet C-10 The entry monument parkway on the south side of Base Line from the western city limit to Alta Cuesta. Ground Cover area: 9,756 square feet Hardscape area: 4,380 square feet C-11 The parkway on the east side of Beryl from Alder to 135 feet north of Culpepper. Ground Cover area: 3,400 square feet Hardscape area: 3,600 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 14 Fiscal Year 2011/12 C-12 The parkway on the east side of Hellman from Tryon to 665 feet north of Tryon. Grcund Cover area: 8,280 square feet Hardscape area: 3,325 square feet C-13 The parkway on the west side of Hellman from 500 feet north of Church to Church. Ground Cover area: 2,416 square feet Hardscape area: 3,000 square feet C-14 The east side of Archibald from 196 feet north of Palo Alto to 530 feet north of Palo Alto. Ground Cover area: 4,262 square feet Hardscape area: 1,374 square feet C-15 The north side of San Bernardino from Summerlin to 225' west of Summerlin. Ground Cover area: 1,660 square feet Hardscape area: 710 square feet C-16 The south side of Base Line from 286 feet west of Hermosa to Hermosa. The raised planter on the southwest corner of Base Line and Hermosa. Ground Cover area: 4,190 square feet Hardscape area: 2,320 square feet C-17 The east side of Hellman from 775 feet south of 6th St. to 6th St. The south side of 6th St from Hellman to Golden Oak Rd. The west side of Golden Oak Rd. from 6th St. to Foxbrook Dr. Ground cover area: 9,058 square feet Hardscape area: 6,387 square feet D-1 The east side of Rochester from Church to Base Line. Ground Cover area: 11,126 square feet Turf area: 16,794 square feet Hardscape area: 17,301 square feet D-2 The east side of Rochester from 146 feet south of Chervil to Church St. Ground Cover area: 11,908 square feet Turf area: 9,950 square feet Hardscape area: 13,263 square feet D-3 The south side of Baseline from Rochester to 600 feet east of Rochester. Ground Cover area: 2,180 square feet Hardscape area: 4,121 square feet D-4 The north and south si des of Church St. from Rochester to 150 feet east of Hyssop Dr. Ground Cover area: 6,340 square feet Hardscape area: 8,887 square feet H-9 The Haven median from the 210 freeway to Alta Loma Drive. Ground cover area: 2,207 square feet H-10 The Haven median from entrance of Haven Village to Amber Lane. Ground Cover area: 4,402 square feet Turf area: 2,566 square feet The total square footage for the Ground Cover improvement is 8,804 and the Turt improvement square footage is 5,131; however, due to the location of the improvements the other half is maintained by the General Fund. Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 15 Fiscal Year 2011/12 H-11 The Haven median from Amber Lane to Olive Street. Ground Cover area: 3,289 square feet Turf area: 1,738 square feet The total square footage for the Ground Cover improvement is 6,577 and the Turf improvement square footage is 3,475; however, due to the location of the improvements the other half is maintained by the General Fund. H-12 The Haven median from Olive Street to 712 feet north of Wilson. Ground Cover area: 4,767 square feet Turf area: 9,950 square feet The total square footage for the Ground Cover improvement is 9,534 and the Turf improvement square footage is 3,933; however, due to the location of the improvements the other half is maintained by the General Fund. H-13 The Haven median from 19'" Street to the 210 freeway. Ground Cover area: 12,514 square feet FH-18 The Foothill median from East Avenue to 453 feet east of Cornwall Avenue. Ground Cover area: 5,450 square feet Ground cover, shrubs and turf areas that make up parkways, median islands and paseos are maintained under contract by a private landscape maintenance company. Parks are maintained by the City's Park Maintenance Crews. Map of Improvements The following page shows the map of landscaping improvements, including irrigation sites and community trails, to be maintained using District funds. Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 16 Fiscal Year 2011/12 IZQ a' ~ o m `'' m ~ L 3 ~ ~ J Q1 r O Z ny epuenyH ~~ , V ^~ L ~+ ~N Q 0 V ~ ~ ~ A W ww,, W •~~~~~` O L ~ ~ ny uaneH N ny esouuaH ,Q ~_ aQ ~ nV PIeQ!y~N J ny uewllaH m ~ ny ~a~sayaoa 1 ~ ~ N m _~' `~ ~ ~~ m o N ° ° ~ ~ 00~ ~ ,. . > ~, - _. N N,d~, o r 1 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Z Q W ~ _ J ~ W ~ Z Z Z O J O m ~ Q w H C~ ~ C~ Y ~ O Q ~ w ~ Q ~ Q ~ i"'1 ~ i i o ^ ; , i i i ' r~~1 ~se3 N 5l1 sayooa r ua~!II!W O uaneH O :ouuaH ~ _ ny uewllaH O ~'• ~ ~, ~e ^~• a Q _ ny p~e6au~ ~g ue!lawe~ Q Q ~Q f•1 V ~ Q ~ U •~ ;r cm c nyanc Q ~ - ~ -~ m m v _ r m L m m g ~~~• v, ~ T y C V m VI ESTIMATE OF COSTS The estimated costs of administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing the improvements as described in the Plans and Specifications are summarized below. Each year, as part of the assessment district levy calculation process, the costs and expenses are reviewed and the annual costs are projected for the following fiscal year. District Budget Estimated 2011N2 Bud et Personnel Services Regular Payroll $142,250.00 Part-time Salaries 22,400.00 Fringe Benefits 69.060.00 Subtotal Personnel $233,710.00 Operations and Maintenance Operations and Maintenance $68,850.00 O 8 M Facilities 11,500.00 Vehicle Operations and Maintenance 2,000.00 Equipment Operations and Maintenance 3,800.00 Depreciation of Computer Equipment 440.00 Contract Services 604,300.00 Tree Maintenance 63,260.00 Utilities Telephone Utilities 3,440.00 Water Utilities 247,530.00 Electric Utilities 57,410.00 Assessment Administration 65,020.00 General Overhead 82.190.00 Subtotal Operations and Maintenance $1,209,740.00 Capital Expenditures Capital Outlav -Vehicles 5 390.00 Subtotal Capital Expenditures $5,390.00 Total Expenditure Budget $1,448,840.00 Total Estimated Assessment $1,189,880.00 Less Anticipated Delinquencies (70.400.00) Total Estimated Revenue $1,119,480.00 Plus Operating Reserve Fund Contribution 329.360.00 Total Expenditure Budget $1,448.840.00 Total Estimated Assessment $1,189,860.00 Total District EBU Count 12,903.46 Actual Assessment per EBU -Fiscal Year 2011/12 $92.21 M xim m Allow I A ess a er EBU -Fiscal Year 2011/12 2. 1 Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 17 Fiscal Year 2011/12 The maximum allowable assessment per EBU listed in the District budget above, is the amount which was approved in 1996/97 and subsequent District annexations. Each year, prior to the assessments being placed on the tax roll, the City will review the budget and determine the amount needed to maintain the improvements for the upcoming fiscal year. The actual assessment per EBU will be based on the estimated costs of maintenance, available fund balance and maximum allowable assessment with the goal of maintaining the improvements in a satisfactory and healthy condition. The actual assessment amount may be lower than the maximum allowable assessment; however it may not exceed the maximum unless the increase is approved by the property owners in accordance with Proposition 218. It is the intent of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to maintain an Operating Reserve which shall not exceed the estimated costs of maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or when the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The reserve balance information for the District is as follows: Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2011 Reserve Fund Balance $738,330.00 Operating Reserve Contribution -Fiscal Year 2011/12 (329,360.00) Ooerating Reserve Collection -Fiscal Year 2011/12 0.00 Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2012 Reserve Fund Batance $408,970.00 Definitions of Budget Items The following definitions describe the costs and expenses included in the District Budget: Personnel Services Reoular Salaries: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all full-time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Part Time Salaries: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all part time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Frinoe Benefits: This item includes the benefits available to City employees: health care, vacation, sick time, and retirement fund. Operations and Maintenance Contract Services: This item includes the contract costs of a landscape maintenance company responsible for the ongoing maintenance of the District improvements. Tree Maintenance: This item includes the contract costs attributed to maintaining the street trees and other trees throughout the District. Utilities -Water: This item includes the costs to furnish water for the landscaping within the District. Utilities -Electric: This item includes the costs to furnish electricity required for the operation and maintenance of the sprinklers and irrigation controllers. Assessment Administration: This item includes the cost to all particular departments and staff of the City, and consultants for providing the administration, coordination and management of District services, operations, and incidental expenses related to the District. This item also includes creation of an annual engineer's report, resolutions and placing the assessment amounts onto the County tax Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 - Ciry of Rancho Cucamonga 18 Fiscal Year 2011/12 roll each year, along with responding to any public inquiries and future Proposition 218 balloting proceedings. General Overhead: This item includes the costs of all departments and staff of the City for providing the coordination of District services, inspections, annual bid management, responding to public concerns, public education, accounting, auditing and procedural matters associated with the District. This item also includes an allocation for general City staff time for administrative functions and systems that provide for a functional and operational assessment district within the City's administrative structure. Capital Expenditures: Caoital Projects: This item includes new improvements to further enhance the level and quality of service provided within the boundaries of the District. This may include new monuments, irrigation systems, and other large improvements. Operating Reserve Collection: Ooeratino Reserve Collection: This item includes the amount to be collected to maintain reserves to enable the City to pay for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or whenever the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The Reserve Fund contribution will continue until such a time the Reserve Fund balance is approximately one half of the annual costs. The fund may be allowed to accumulate in anticipation of any unforeseen expenses not included in the yearly maintenance costs. This may include, but is not limited to, tree replacements, repair of damaged equipment due to vandalism, storms and other similar events. Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 19 Fiscal Year 2011/12 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT General Pursuant to the 1972 Act and Article XIII D, all parcels that have a special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements and services shall be identified, and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel shall be determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of improvements. The 1972 Act, permits the establishment of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include the operation, maintenance and servicing of landscaping improvements. Section 22573 of the 1972 Act requires that maintenance assessments must be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. This Section states: "The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district maybe apportioned by any formula or method which fairty distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements. " The determination of whether or not a lot or parcel will benefit from the improvements shall be made pursuant to the Improvement Act of 1911 (Division 7 (commencing with Section 5000) (of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California)." The 1972 Act also permits the designation of zones of benefit within any individual assessment district if "by reasons or variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive different degrees of benefit from the improvement" (Sec. 22547). Article XIII D, Section 4(a) of the California Constitution limits the amount of any assessment to the proportional special benefit conferred on the property. Article XIII D also provides that publicly owned properties must be assessed unless there is clear and convincing evidence that those properties receive no special benefit from the assessment. Exempted from the assessment would be the areas of public streets, public avenues, public lanes, public roads, public drives, public courts, public alleys, public easements and rights-of-ways, public greenbelts and public parkways. The net amount to be assessed may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels. Proposition 216, approved by the voters in November 1996, requires the City to separate general benefit from special benefit, where only special benefit is assessed. Special Benefit The maintenance and servicing of the improvements within the District (which are described in the Description of Services and Improvements Section of this report) are for the benefit of the properties within the District, and as such confer a special and direct benefit to parcels within the District by: • improving the livability, appearance, and desirability for properties within the boundaries of the District, and • ensuring that improvements do not reach a state of deterioration or disrepair so as to be materially detrimental to properties within the District, and Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 20 Fiscal Year 2011/12 • providing beautification, shade and overall enhancement to properties within the District. The above mentioned items affect the assessed property in a way that is particular and distinct from their effect on other parcels and that real property in general and the public at large do not share. They contribute to a specific enhancement of the properties within the District. Since these improvements, including the community trails, were installed and are maintained specifically for the properties within the District; only properties within the District receive a special benefit and are assessed for said maintenance. General Benefit In addition to the special benefits received by parcels within the District, there are derivative general benefits that are conferred on parcels outside the boundaries of the District which include: • the control of dust and insect infestations, and • the visual enhancement of the area to persons or vehicles that may travel through the District. However it has been determined that these benefits are derivative and do not provide a direct benefit to parcels outside of the district that are not being assessed. Method of Assessment Spread Each of the parcels within the District is deemed to receive special benefit from the improvements. Each parcel that has a special benefit conferred upon it as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements are identified and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel is determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of the improvements. When the District was formed in 1979, Article XIII D and Proposition 218 had not yet been passed. Upon the passage of Article XIII D and the subsequent passage of the Proposition Omnibus Implementation Act, new rules were put into place. Due to the changes in legal requirements, as property annexed to the District offer the passage of the Assessment Law, the description of the method of assessment became more refined, however, the assessment per parcel has remained the same since the 1996/97 Fiscal Year. Further, no parcel included in the District formation or annexations prior to when the language was refined, are now being levied differently than they were at the time the District was formed or the parcels were annexed. To assess special benefit appropriately, it is necessary to relate the different type of parcel improvements to each other. The Equivalent Benefit Unit ("EBU") method of apportionment uses the single family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single family home equals one Equivalent Benefit Unit (EBU). Every other land-use is converted to EBUs based on an assessment formula that equates to the property's specific development status, type of development (land-use), and size of the property, as compared to a single family home. Vacant parcels are assigned an EBU value of 0.25 per acre because they receive a lesser benefit from the improvements until such time as development occurs. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land-use types, as assigned by County use code, to determine each parcel's EBU assignment. Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 21 Fiscal Year 2011/12 Land-Use E uivalent Dwellin Units Pro e T e Coun Use Code EBU Value Multi lier Single Family Residential 1.00 Dwelling Unit Multi-Family Residential 0.50 Dwelling Unit Non-Residential 2.00 Acre The use of the latest County Assessor's Secured Roll shall be the basis for the Property Type determination and unitslacreage assignments, unless better data is available to the City. In addition, if any parcel within the District is identified by the County Auditor/Controller to be an invalid parcel number for the current fiscal year, the Property Type and EBU assignment shall be based on the correct parcel number and/or new parcel number(s) County use code and subsequent property information. If a single parcel has changed to multiple parcels, the EBU assignment and assessment amount applied to each of the new parcels will be recalculated rather than spread the proportionate share of the original assessment. The following table summarizes the Fiscal Year 2011/12 maximum allowable assessment rates for the District: Property Type (County Use Code) Maximum Allowable Assessment Rate er EBU Actual Assessment Rate er EBU Total Units/Acres Total EBUs Single Family Residential $92.21 $92.21 7,826.00 7,826.00 Multi-Family Residential 92.21 92.21 10,127.00 5,063.50 Non-Residential 92.21 92.21 14.30 28.60 The total amount of maintenance and incidental costs for maintaining the landscaping and community trail improvements is assessed to the individual parcels of real property within the District in proportion to the special benefit received by such parcels of real property. The proposed individual assessments are shown on the assessment roll in this report. Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 22 Fiscal Year 2011/12 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM An Assessment Diagram for the District is shown on the following page. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the County Assessor of the County San Bernardino, at the time this report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Engineer's Report. Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 23 Fiscal Year 2011/12 ~.. v ~~ +-~ "~~ J ^, ~- ~ ny /u~a4~ Of 4 . ~ O V i r .._.._.._.._ ~ J 5. o ~ i ~ ~ N C ~ ~ J m ~ o ` j N m t 3 0 ~~ ~ m i° i ' nH aSe3 in ~ i ® a i ny epuenn!;3 ny epueM!;3 ~ i - V j y j ~8 ~aa~~ !ea C ._.._.._.._.._.._.._..~ ~ ny ~a;sayoob J i ny ~a;sayooa n ua ,~..: i ._.._.._.._.._ _ --I _ y ~!II!W f ny ua~l!II!W ny uaneH ny uaneH ny esow~aH (~ ny esow~aH nV Ple4!4oi`d nV PIe9!4o~H ny uewllaH ~ ny uewllaH L t ~ ny p~e~(au !n ;g ue!lawe~ i 3°f °6`s •Z ~'s €•~siY=B~sE L~~F ~ F4 9 a4L ~ £ {{ L" 6- ~ _ _ _ pp€ t € y c m IL `ease Haz~' Pew S ~° aEE ~ N >, V n P F ~i4,.3 g_ga_ n ss9p~ ' o C m s = 6@aei d€f `i~S o, ~° ~€=~EYasE =Q @~a ~aa z~ e s ~ EYVej.V~€' g ASSESSMENT ROLL Assessment Roll The assessment roll is a listing of the assessment for Fiscal Year 2011/12 apportioned to each lot or parcel, as shown on the last equalized roll of the Assessor of the County of San Bernardino. The following tables summarize the Fiscal Year 2011/12 maximum and actual assessments for the District: Property Type (County Use Code Maximum Allowable Assessment Rate er EBU Total Units/Acres Total EBUs Maximum Allowable Assessment Single Family Residential $92.21 7,826.00 7,826.00 $721,635.46 Multi-Family Residential 92.21 10,127.00 5,063.50 466,905.34 Non-ResidentialNacant 92.21 6.98 13.96 1,287.25 TOTALS 17,959.98 12,903.46 $1,189,828.05 Property Type (County Use Code Actual Assessment Rate er EBU Total UnitslAcres Total EBUs Actual Assessment Single Family Residential $92.21 7,826.00 7,826.00 $721,631.46 Multi-Family Residential 92.21 10,127.00 5,063.50 466,905.34 Non-ResidentialNacant 92.21 6.98 13.96 1,287.25 TOTALS 17,959.98 12,903.46 $1,189,828.05 A copy of the full assessment roll is available for review in the City Clerk's office. Annexations The following annexations are effective for the 2011/12 Fiscal Year: Assessor's Parcel Annexation Total Total Property Type Number Date Pro'ect Units/Acres EBUs Coun Use Code 0229-041-10 10/21/2009 DRC2006-00540 225 112.50 Multi-Family Residential Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 24 Fiscal Year 2011112 Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2011/2012 City of Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 3A (Hyssop) CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3A (HYSSOP MAINTENANCE DISTRICT) 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Phone: 909.477.2740 Fax: 909.477.2741 CITY COUNCIL L. Dennis Michael, Mayor Sam Spagnolo, Mayor Pro Tem William Alexander, Council Member Chuck Buquet, Council Member Diane Williams, Council Member CITY STAFF John R. Gillison, Assistant City Manager Linda D. Daniels, Deputy City Manager William Wittkopf, Public Works Director Ingrid Y. Bruce, GIS/Special Districts Manager Christopher Bopko, Management Analyst III TABLE OF CONTENTS ENGINEER'S LETTER INTRODUCTION 1 3 Reason for Assessment .............................................................................................3 Process for Annual Assessment .................................................................................3 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS 5 Description of the Boundaries of the District ...............................................................5 Description of Improvements and Services ................................................................5 Map of Improvements .................................................................................................5 ESTIMATE OF COSTS 6 District Budget ............................................................................................................6 Definitions of Budget Items .........................................................................................7 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT 9 General ....................................................................................................................... 9 Special Benefit ...........................................................................................................9 General Benefit ........................................................................................................10 Method of Assessment Spread ................................................................................10 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM ASSESSMENT ROLL 12 13 Assessment Roll .......................................................................................................13 Annexations ..............................................................................................................13 ENGINEER'S LETTER WHEREAS, on July 6, 2011, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga (the "City"), under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 (the "1972 Act") adopted its Resolution No. 11-098, a Resolution Initiating Proceedings for the Levy of Annual Assessments for Landscape Maintenance District No. 3A (Hyssop Maintenance District) (the "District"); and WHEREAS, the Resolution Initiating Proceedings directed staff to prepare and file an Engineer's Report for Fiscal Year 2011/12 pursuant to the requirements of the 1972 Act. The Engineer's Report presents the plans and specifications describing the general nature, location and extent of the improvements to be maintained, an estimate of the costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements for the District for the referenced fiscal year, a diagram for the District, showing the area and properties proposed to be assessed, and an assessment of the estimated costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing the improvements, assessing the net amount upon all assessable lots andlor parcels within the District in proportion to the special benefit received; and NOW THEREFORE, the following assessment is proposed to be authorized in order to pay the estimated costs of maintenance, operation and servicing of the improvements to be paid by the assessable real property within the boundaries of the District in proportion to the special benefit received. The following table summarizes the proposed assessment. SUMMARY OF ASSESSMENT Fiscal Year 2011/12 Total Estimated Assessment $3,720.00 Plus Anticipated Delinquency Penalty 520.00 Total Estimated Revenue $4,240.00 Plus Reserve Fund Contribution 600.00 Total Expenditure Budget $4,840.00 Total District EBU Count 9.00 Actual Assessment per EBU $413.74 Maximum Allowable Assessment per EBU $413.74 In making the assessments contained herein pursuant to the 1972 Act: I have identified all parcels which will have a special benefit conferred upon them from the improvements described in the Special Benefit Section of this Engineer's Report (the "Specially Benefited Parcels"). For particulars as to the identification of said parcels, reference is made to the Assessment Diagram, a copy of which is included in this Engineer's Report. 2. I have evaluated the costs and expenses of the improvements upon the Specially Benefited Parcels. In making such evaluation: Landscape Maintenance District No. 3A -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2011/12 a. The proportionate special benefit derived by each Specially Benefited Parcel from the improvements was determined in relationship to the entirety of the maintenance costs of the improvements; b. No assessment has been imposed on any Specially Benefited Parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on such parcel from the improvements; and c. Any general benefits from the improvements have been separated from the special benefits and only special benefits have been assessed. I, the undersigned, respectfully submit the enclosed Engineer's Report and, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, the Engineer's Report, Assessments, and the Assessment Diagram herein have been prepared and computed in accordance with the order of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Assessment Law. Landscape Maintenance District No. 3A -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2011/12 INTRODUCTION Reason for Assessment Approval of the assessment covered by this Engineer's Report will generate the revenue necessary to: Provide for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements described in this Engineer's Report. Maintenance may include but is not limited to, all of the following: the repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement, providing for the life, growth, health and beauty of the landscaping, including cultivation, irrigation, trimming, spraying, fertilizing or treating for disease or injury, the removal of trimming, rubbish, debris and other solid waste, the maintenance, repair and replacement as necessary of all irrigation systems and the removal of graffiti from walls immediately adjacent to the cultivated areas. Servicing means the furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operating and servicing of any improvement. Servicing shall also include vehicle, equipment, capital improvements and administrative costs associated with the annual administration and operation of the District. Process for Annual Assessment The City cannot levy and collect annual assessments within the District without complying with the procedures specified in the 1972 Act. On an annual basis, an Engineer's Report must be prepared which contains a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the district. The City Council must also adopt a resolution of intention which: • Declares the intention of the City Council to levy and collect assessments within the assessment district for the fiscal year stated therein. • Generally describes the existing and proposed improvements and any substantial changes proposed to be made in existing improvements. • Refers to the assessment district by its distinctive designation and indicate the general location of the district. • Refers to the report of the engineer, on file with the clerk, for a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the district. • Gives notice of the time and place for public hearing by the City Council on the levy of the proposed assessment. • States whether the assessment is proposed to increase from the previous year. If the assessments are to be levied in the same or lesser amounts than the maximum assessment amount approved, the clerk shall give notice by causing the resolution of intention to be published. Any interested person may, prior to the conclusion of the public hearing, file a written protest which shall state all grounds of objection. The protest shall contain a description sufficient to identify the property owned by the property owner filing the protest. During the course or upon conclusion of the hearing, the City Council may order changes in any of the matters provided in the report, including changes in the improvements, any zones within the assessment district, and the proposed diagram or the proposed assessment. The City Council, upon conclusion of the public hearing must then adopt a resolution confirming the diagram and assessment, either as originally proposed or as changed by it. The adoption of the resolution shall constitute the levy of an assessment for the fiscal vear referred to in the assessment. Landscape Maintenance District No. 3A -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2011 /12 If the assessment to be levied exceeds the maximum assessment amount previously approved, the City must comply with the procedures specified in Article XIIID and Proposition 218. The voters in the State of California in November 1996 added Article XIIID to the California Constitution imposing, among other requirements, the necessity far the City to conduct an assessment ballot procedure to enable the owners of each property on which assessments are proposed to be enacted or increased, the opportunity to express their support for, or opposition to the proposed assessment or increase in such assessment. The basic steps of the assessment ballot procedure are outlined below. The City must prepare a Notice of Public Hearing ("Notice"), which describes, along with other mandated information, the reason for the proposed assessments, and to provide a date and time of a public hearing to be held on the matter. The City must also prepare an assessment ballot, which clearly gives the property owner the ability to sign and mark their assessment ballot either in favor of, or in opposition to the proposed assessment. The Notice and assessment ballot are mailed to each affected property owner within the District a minimum of 45 days prior to the public hearing date as shown in the Notice. The City may also hold community meetings with the property owners to discuss the issues facing the District and to answer property owner questions directly. After the Notice and assessment ballot are mailed, property owners are given until the close of the public hearing, stated in the Notice, to return their signed and marked assessment ballot. During the public hearing, property owners are given the opportunity to address the City Council and ask questions or voice their concerns. At the public hearing, the returned assessment ballots received prior to the close of the public hearing are tabulated, weighted by the proposed assessment amount on each property and the results are announced by the City Council. Article XIIID provides that if, as a result of the assessment ballot proceeding, a majority protest is found to exist, the City Council shall not have the authority to levy and collect the assessments as proposed. A majority protest exists if the assessments represented by ballots submitted in opposition exceed those submitted in favor of the assessment. All returned ballots are tabulated and weighted according to the financial obligation of each particular parcel. If there is no majority protest as described above, the City Council may approve the proposed assessments. If there is a majority protest, as described above, the City will not levy and collect any assessments. Landscape Maintenance District No. 3A -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2011 /12 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS The District provides for the administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing of various improvements located within the public right-of-way and dedicated easements within the boundaries of the District. Description of the Boundaries of the District The District is located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California. The boundaries of the District are generally described as that area of the City South and East of Hyssop Drive south of 6`" Street. Reference is also made to the Assessment Diagram included in this Report. Description of Improvements and Services The improvements are the maintenance and servicing of landscaping sites and appurtenant facilities throughout the District. The landscaping maintenance includes, but is not limited to, shrubs, turf, tree trimming, weed and pest control, landscape irrigation systems and testing, trash, debris and graffiti removal, and associated appurtenant facilities. Services include personnel, materials, contracting services, utilities, and all necessary costs associated with the maintenance, replacement and repair required to keep the improvements in a healthy, vigorous and satisfactory condition. In addition, it is the City's intention to continue to use cost effective materials, including the future ability to replace landscaping with drought resistant or low water use plants, in order to lower expenses of the District. The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows: Site # Descriptive Location J-1 The west side of Hyssop from south of 6th street to the south end of the cul-de-sac. Ground Cover area: 6,050 square feet. Map of Improvements The following page shows the map of landscaping improvements, including irrigation sites and community trails, to be maintained using District funds. Landscape Maintenance District No. 3A -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2011/12 Z a a ~ z w o. J w w J ~ lQ } J _ g Q K $ ~ W ay , ~ ~ ~ h ,g ~y~/ j .. ~C,2y Q . z , . ~Y~ , ~~ : ~ ~ i ~ -- y.. Q ,y _ ~..._.._.._.._.,_,._,...._.._....._,...._.,_,......._.._..~-._ RP .~ - , .IA~5~ON I i,.~ Q ~ ~ ~ °~ . J ~.~~°~ ~ ~ ° ~ ,,r ~ J ~ [fiID i , z. V C dado Md S6 I ,~ s~ C ~ o C _„ ~, ~_danio st. l L ~ Q • ~ ~ ~ ; ..~'~ Q o ` . ~ o V ~` \ ~ .. . _ , ~ \~ , ,~ ~ ~ ~. J `, j ~ g E g 8aa ~'g @i:s88~gg3~@ E . p ~~ a"s=;gg € ~~pss a8 ~ ~ °€ ' \ F - ~ s ea see @ C F L EOo~i °cLee°~03~J6g ESTIMATE OF COSTS The estimated costs of administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing the improvements as described in the Plans and Specifications are summarized below. Each year, as part of the assessment district levy calculation process, the costs and expenses are reviewed and the annual costs are projected for the following fiscal year. District Estimated 2011/12 Bud et Personnel Services Regular Payroll $0.00 Part-time Salaries 0.00 Fringe Benefits 0.00 Subtotal Personnel $0.00 Operations and Maintenance Operations and Maintenance $200.00 Contract Services 3,230.00 Tree Maintenance 0.00 Utilities Water Utilities 500.00 Electric Utilities 600.00 Assessment Administration 50.00 General Overhead 260.00 Subtotal Operations and Maintenance $4,840.00 Capital Expenditures Capital Projects 0.00 Subtotal Capital Expenditures $0.00 Total Expenditure Budget $4,840.00 Total Estimated Assessment $3,720.00 Plus Anticipated Delinquency Penalty 520.00 Total Estimated Revenue $4,240.00 Plus Operating Reserve Fund Contribution 600.00 Total Expenditure Budget $4,840.00 Total Estimated Assessment $3,720.00 Total District EBU Count 9.00 Actual Assessment per EBU -Fiscal Year 2011/12 $413.74 Maximum Allowable Assessment er EBU -Fiscal Year 2011/12 $413.74 The maximum allowable assessment per EBU listed in the District budget above, is the amount which was approved in 1996/97 and subsequent District annexations. Each year, prior to the assessments being placed on the tax roll, the City will review the budget and determine the amount needed to maintain the improvements for the upcoming fiscal year. The actual assessment per EBU will be based on the estimated costs of maintenance, available fund balance and maximum allowable assessment with the goal of maintaining the improvements in a satisfactory and healthy condition. Landscape Maintenance District No. 3A -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2011/12 The actual assessment amount may be lower than the maximum allowable assessment; however it may not exceed the maximum unless the increase is approved by the property owners in accordance with Proposition 218. It is the intent of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to maintain an Operating Reserve which shall not exceed the estimated costs of maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or when the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The reserve balance information for the District is as follows: Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2011 Reserve Fund Balance $45,050.00 Operating Reserve Contribution -Fiscal Year 2011/12 (600.00) Ooerating Reserve Collection -Fiscal Year 2011/12 0.00 Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2012 Reserve Fund Balance $44,450.00 Definitions of Budget Items The following definitions describe the costs and expenses included in the District Budget Personnel Services Regular Salaries: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all full-time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Part Time Salaries: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all part time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Fringe Benefits: This item includes the benefits available to City employees: health care, vacation, sick time, and retirement fund. Operations and Maintenance Contract Services: This item includes the contract costs of a landscape maintenance company responsible for the ongoing maintenance of the District improvements. Tree Maintenance: This item includes the contract costs attributed to maintaining the street trees and other trees throughout the District. Utilities -Water: This item includes the costs to furnish water for the landscaping within the District. Utilities -Electric: This item includes the costs to furnish electricity required for the operation and maintenance of the sprinklers and irrigation controllers. Assessment Administration: This item includes the cost to all particular departments and staff of the City, and consultants for providing the administration, coordination and management of District services, operations, and incidental expenses related to the District. This item also includes creation of an annual engineer's report, resolutions and placing the assessment amounts onto the County tax roll each year, along with responding to any public inquiries and future Proposition 218 balloting proceedings. General Overhead: This item includes the costs of all departments and staff of the City for providing the coordination of District services, inspections, annual bid management, responding to public concerns, public education, accounting, auditing and procedural matters associated with the District. This item also includes an allocation for general City staff time for administrative functions and Landscape Maintenance District No. 3A -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2011112 systems that provide for a functional and operational assessment district within the City's administrative structure. Capital Expenditures: Caoital Projects: This item includes new improvements to further enhance the level and quality of service provided within the boundaries of the District. This may include new monuments, irrigation systems, and other large improvements. Operating Reserve Collection: Ooeratino Reserve Collection: This item includes the amount to be collected to maintain reserves to enable the City to pay for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or whenever the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The Reserve Fund contribution will continue until such a time the Reserve Fund balance is approximately one half of the annual costs. The fund may be allowed to accumulate in anticipation of any unforeseen expenses not included in the yearly maintenance costs. This may include, but is not limited to, tree replacements, repair of damaged equipment due to vandalism, storms and other similar events. Landscape Maintenance District No. 3A -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2011/12 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT General Pursuant to the 1972 Act and Article XIIID, all parcels that have a special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements and services shall be identified, and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel shall be determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of improvements. The 1972 Act, permits the establishment of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include the operation, maintenance and servicing of landscaping improvements. Section 22573 of the 1972 Act requires that maintenance assessments must be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. This Section states: "The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district maybe apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by each such lot or pamel from the improvements." The determination of whether or not a lot or parcel will benefit from the improvements shall be made pursuant to the Improvement Act of 1911 (Division 7 (commencing with Section 5000) (of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California]." The 1972 Act also permits the designation of zones of benefit within any individual assessment district if "by reasons or variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive different degrees of benefit from the improvement" (Sec. 22547). Article XIIID, Section 4(a) of the California Constitution limits the amount of any assessment to the proportional special benefit conferred on the property. Article XIIID also provides that publicly owned properties must be assessed unless there is clear and convincing evidence that those properties receive no special benefit from the assessment. Exempted from the assessment would be the areas of public streets, public avenues, public lanes, public roads, public drives, public courts, public alleys, public easements and rights-of-ways, public greenbelts and public parkways. The net amount to be assessed may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels. Proposition 218, approved by the voters in November 1996, requires the City to separate general benefit from special benefit, where only special benefit is assessed. Benefit The maintenance and servicing of the improvements within the District (which are described in the Description of Services and Improvements Section of this report) are for the benefit of the properties within the District, and as such confer a special and direct benefit to parcels within the District by: • improving the livability, appearance, and desirability for properties within the boundaries of the District, and • ensuring that improvements do not reach a state of deterioration or disrepair so as to be materially detrimental to properties within the District, and Landscape Maintenance District No. 3A -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2011/12 • providing beautification, shade and overall enhancement to properties within the District. The above mentioned items affect the assessed property in a way that is particular and distinct from their effect on other parcels and that real property in general and the public at large do not share. They contribute to a specific enhancement of the properties within the District. Since these improvements, including the community trails, were installed and are maintained specifically for the properties within the District; only properties within the District receive a special benefit and are assessed for said maintenance. General Benefit In addition to the special benefits received by parcels within the District, there are derivative general benefits that are conferred on parcels outside the boundaries of the District which include: • the control of dust and insect infestations, and • the visual enhancement of the area to persons or vehicles that may travel through the District. However it has been determined that these benefits are derivative and do not provide a direct benefit to parcels outside of the district that are not being assessed. Method of Assessment Spread Each of the parcels within the District is deemed to receive special benefit from the improvements. Each parcel that has a special benefit conferred upon it as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements are identified and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel is determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of the improvements. When the District was formed in 1984, Article XIIID and Proposition 218 had not yet been passed. Upon the passage of Article XIIID and the subsequent passage of the Proposition Omnibus Implementation Act, new rules were put into place. Due to the changes in legal requirements, as property annexed to the District after the passage of the Assessment Law, the description of the method of assessment became more refined, however, the assessment per parcel has remained the same since the 1996/97 Fiscal Year. Further, no parcel included in the District formation or annexations prior to when the language was refined, are now being levied differently than they were at the time the District was formed or the parcels were annexed. To assess special benefit appropriately, it is necessary to relate the different type of parcel improvements to each other. The Equivalent Benefit Unit ("EBU") method of apportionment uses the single family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single family home equals one Equivalent Benefit Unit (EBU). Every other land-use is converted to EBUs based on an assessment formula that equates to the property's specific development status, type of development (land-use), and size of the property, as compared to a single family home. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land-use types, as assigned by County use code, to determine each parcel's EBU assignment. Land-Use E uivalent Dwellin Units Pro ert T e Coun Use Code EBU Value Multi tier Non-Residential 1.00 Parcel Landscape Maintenance District No. 3A -City of Rancho Cucamonga 10 Fiscal Year 2011112 The use of the latest County Assessor's Secured Roll shall be the basis for the Property Type determination and units/acreage assignments, unless better data is available to the City. In addition, if any parcel within the District is identified by the County Auditor/Controller to be an invalid parcel number for the current fiscal year, the Property Type and EBU assignment shall be based on the correct parcel number and/or new parcel number(s) County use code and subsequent property information. If a single parcel has changed to multiple parcels, the EBU assignment and assessment amount applied to each of the new parcels will be recalculated rather than spread the proportionate share of the original assessment. The following table summarizes the Fiscal Year 2011/12 maximum allowable assessment rates for the District: Maximum Allowable Property Type Assessment Rate Actual Assessment Total Total (County Use Code) er EBU Rate per EBU Units/Acres EBUs Non-Residential $413.74 $413.74 9 9 The total amount of maintenance and incidental costs for maintaining the landscaping and community trail improvements is assessed to the individual parcels of real property within the District in proportion to the special benefit received by such parcels of real property. The proposed individual assessments are shown on the assessment roll in this report. Landscape Maintenance District No. 3A -City of Rancho Cucamonga 1 t Fiscal Year 2011/12 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM An Assessment Diagram for the District is shown on the following page. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the County Assessor of the County San Bernardino, at the time this report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Engineer's Report. Landscape Maintenance District No. 3A -City of Rancho Cucamonga 12 Fiscal Year 2011/12 i M X41 •- `~_ V /~/}~ ~V .~ Q V a ~~ i J ny ua~!II!W C N ,.. ~. ny epuennl33 ~aa~~ nea ny is;sayooa ny uaneH ~- i i ny esow~aH j- i nV Pleq!4o~H i- i ny uewllaH i ;g uellawe~ N ~ V C .N l0 o (~ S s~ V~ Y~ U - ny /~~a4~ v 01 C _ J CD ~ N ~+ r 3 ~ m a o ~i Q N 1= Q J Q ~ U ~ ~; J ti•r ny lse3 in N O/ I ® ~ ~ ~ I of N oN N O L v ,._.._.._.. i ny epuenn93 ny ~a;sayooa ny ua~!II!W .~ ~ ~ c L J ~ y N m my uaneH - - ! ny esowiaH i inH Pleq!yo~b' ~,•r°~ ny uewllaH /r•• L L v i ny p~e~(auln ..._..--~ - -• ny anal m it .. .. ~ L L p pp O Q LL ASSESSMENT ROLL Assessment Roll The assessment roll is a listing of the assessment for Fiscal Year 2011/12 apportioned to each lot or parcel, as shown on the last equalized roll of the Assessor of the County of San Bernardino. The following tables summarize the Fiscal Year 2011/12 maximum and actual assessments for the District: Maximum Allowable Maximum Property Type Assessment Rate Total Total Allowable Coun Use Code er EBU Units/Acres EBUs Assessment Non-Residential $413.74 9 9 $3,723.66 Actual Property Type Assessment Rate Total Total Actual Coun Use Code er EBU Units/Acres EBUs Assessment Non-Residential $413.74 9 9 $3,723.66 A copy of the full assessment roll is available for review in the City Clerk's office. Annexations There were no annexations effective for the 2011/12 Fiscal Year: Landscape Maintenance District No. 3A -City of Rancho Cucamonga 13 Fiscal Year 2011/12 Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2011/2012 City of Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B (Commercial Industrial) CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B (COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL MAINTENANCE DISTRICT) 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Phone: 909.477.2740 Fax: 909.477.2741 CITY COUNCIL L. Dennis Michael, Mayor Sam Spagnolo, Mayor Pro Tem William Alexander, Council Member Chuck Buquet, Council Member Diane Williams, Council Member CITY STAFF John R. Gillison, Assistant City Manager Linda D. Daniels, Deputy City Manager William Wittkopf, Public Works Director Ingrid Y. Bruce, GIS/Special Districts Manager Christopher Bopko, Management Analyst III TABLE OF CONTENTS ENGINEER'S LETTER INTRODUCTION 3 Reason for Assessment .............................................................................................3 Process for Annual Assessment .................................................................................3 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS 5 Description of the Boundaries of the District ...............................................................5 Description of Improvements and Services ................................................................5 Map of Improvements .................................................................................................7 ESTIMATE OF COSTS 8 District Budget ............................................................................................................8 Definitions of Budget Items .........................................................................................9 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT 11 General .....................................................................................................................11 Special Benefit .........................................................................................................11 General Benefit ........................................................................................................12 Method of Assessment Spread ................................................................................12 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM ASSESSMENT ROLL 14 15 Assessment Roll .......................................................................................................15 Annexations ..............................................................................................................15 ENGINEER'S LETTER WHEREAS, on July 6, 2011, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga (the "City"), under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 (the "1972 Act") adopted its Resolution No. 11-098, a Resolution Initiating Proceedings for the Levy of Annual Assessments for Landscape Maintenance District No. 36 (Commercial Industrial Maintenance District) (the "District"); and WHEREAS, the Resolution Initiating Proceedings staff to prepare and file an Engineer's Report for Fiscal Year 2011/12 pursuant to the requirements of the 1972 Act. The Engineer's Report presents the plans and specifications describing the general nature, location and extent of the improvements to be maintained, an estimate of the costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements for the District for the referenced fiscal year, a diagram for the District, showing the area and properties proposed to be assessed, and an assessment of the estimated costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing the improvements, assessing the net amount upon all assessable lots and/or parcels within the District in proportion to the special benefit received; and NOW THEREFORE, the following assessment is proposed to be authorized in order to pay the estimated costs of maintenance, operation and servicing of the improvements to be paid by the assessable real property within the boundaries of the District in proportion to the special benefit received. The following table summarizes the proposed assessment. SUMMARY OF ASSESSMENT Fiscal Year 2011/12 Total Estimated Assessment $980,970.00 Less Anticipated Delinquencies 43 650.00 Total Estimated Revenue $937,320.00 Plus Reserve Fund Contribution 434 900.00 Total Expenditure Budget $1,372,220.00 Total District EBU Count 2,780.52 Actual Assessment per EBU $352.80 Maximum Allowable Assessment per EBU $352.80 In making the assessments contained herein pursuant to the 1972 Act: I have identified all parcels which will have a special benefit conferred upon them from the improvements described in the Special Benefit Section of this Engineer's Report (the "Specially Benefited Parcels"). For particulars as to the identification of said parcels, reference is made to the Assessment Diagram, a copy of which is included in this Engineer's Report. 2. I have evaluated the costs and expenses of the improvements upon the Specially Benefited Parcels. In making such evaluation: Landscape Maintenance District No. 36 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2011/12 a. The proportionate special benefit derived by each Specially Benefited Parcel from the improvements was determined in relationship to the entirety of the maintenance costs of the improvements; b. No assessment has been imposed on any Specially Benefited Parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on such parcel from the improvements; and c. Any general benefits from the improvements have been separated from the special benefits and only special benefits have been assessed. I, the undersigned, respectfully submit the enclosed Engineer's Report and, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, the Engineer's Report, Assessments, and the Assessment Diagram herein have been prepared and computed in accordance with the order of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Assessment Law. Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2011/12 INTRODUCTION Reason for Assessment Approval of the assessment covered by this Engineer's Report will generate the revenue necessary to: Provide for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements described in this Engineer's Report. Maintenance may include but is not limited to, all of the following: the repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement, providing for the life, growth, health and beauty of the landscaping, including cultivation, irrigation, trimming, spraying, fertilizing or treating for disease or injury, the removal of trimming, rubbish, debris and other solid waste, the maintenance, repair and replacement as necessary of all irrigation systems and the removal of graffiti from walls immediately adjacent to the cultivated areas. Servicing means the furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operating and servicing of any improvement. Servicing shall also include vehicle, equipment, capital improvements and administrative costs associated with the annual administration and operation of the District. Process for Annual Assessment The City cannot levy and collect annual assessments within the District without complying with the procedures specified in the 1972 Act. On an annual basis, an Engineer's Report must be prepared which contains a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the district. The City Council must also adopt a resolution of intention which: • Declares the intention of the City Council to levy and collect assessments within the assessment district for the fiscal year stated therein. • Generally describes the existing and proposed improvements and any substantial changes proposed to be made in existing improvements. • Refers to the assessment district by its distinctive designation and indicate the general location of the district. • Refers to the report of the engineer, on file with the clerk, far a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the district. • Gives notice of the time and place for public hearing by the City Council on the levy of the proposed assessment. • States whether the assessment is proposed to increase from the previous year. If the assessments are to be levied in the same or lesser amounts than the maximum assessment amount approved, the clerk shall give notice by causing the resolution of intention to be published. Any interested person may, prior to the conclusion of the public hearing, file a written protest which shall state all grounds of objection. The protest shall contain a description sufficient to identify the property owned by the property owner filing the protest. During the course or upon conclusion of the hearing, the City Council may order changes in any of the matters provided in the report, including changes in the improvements, any zones within the assessment district, and the proposed diagram or the proposed assessment. The City Council, upon conclusion of the public hearing must then adopt a resolution confirming the diagram and assessment, either as originally proposed or as changed by it. The adoption of the resolution shall constitute the levy of an assessment for the fiscal year referred to in the assessment. Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2011 /12 If the assessment to be levied exceeds the maximum assessment amount previously approved, the City must comply with the procedures specified in Article XIIID and Proposition 218. The voters in the State of California in November 1996 added Article XIIID to the California Constitution imposing, among other requirements, the necessity for the City to conduct an assessment ballot procedure to enable the owners of each property on which assessments are proposed to be enacted or increased, the opportunity to express their support for, or opposition to the proposed assessment or increase in such assessment. The basic steps of the assessment ballot procedure are outlined below. The City must prepare a Notice of Public Hearing ("Notice"), which describes, along with other mandated information, the reason for the proposed assessments, and to provide a date and time of a public hearing to be held on the matter. The City must also prepare an assessment ballot, which clearly gives the property owner the ability to sign and mark their assessment ballot either in favor of, or in opposition to the proposed assessment. The Notice and assessment ballot are mailed to each affected property owner within the District a minimum of 45 days prior to the public hearing date as shown in the Notice. The City may also hold community meetings with the property owners to discuss the issues facing the District and to answer property owner questions directly. After the Notice and assessment ballot are mailed, property owners are given until the close of the public hearing, stated in the Notice, to return their signed and marked assessment ballot. During the public hearing, property owners are given the opportunity to address the City Council and ask questions or voice their concerns. At the public hearing, the returned assessment ballots received prior to the close of the public hearing are tabulated, weighted by the proposed assessment amount on each property and the results are announced by the City Council. Article XIIID provides that if, as a result of the assessment ballot proceeding, a majority protest is found to exist, the City Council shall not have the authority to levy and collect the assessments as proposed. A majority protest exists if the assessments represented by ballots submitted in opposition exceed those submitted in favor of the assessment. All returned ballots are tabulated and weighted according to the financial obligation of each particular parcel. If there is no majority protest as described above, the City Council may approve the proposed assessments. If there is a majority protest, as described above, the City will not levy and collect any assessments. Landscape Maintenance District No. 36 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 4 Fiscal Year 2011/12 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS The District provides for the administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing of various improvements located within the public right-of-way and dedicated easements within the boundaries of the District. Description of the Boundaries of the District The District is located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California. The boundaries of the District are generally described as that area of the City South and East of Hyssop Drive south of 6th Street. Reference is also made to the Assessment Diagram included in this Report. Description of Improvements and Services The improvements are the maintenance and servicing of landscaping sites and appurtenant facilities throughout the District. The landscaping maintenance includes, but is not limited to, shrubs, turt, tree trimming, weed and pest control, landscape irrigation systems and testing, trash, debris and graffiti removal, and associated appurtenant facilities. Services include personnel, materials, contracting services, utilities, and all necessary costs associated with the maintenance, replacement and repair required to keep the improvements in a healthy, vigorous and satisfactory condition. In addition, it is the City's intention to continue to use cost effective materials, including the future ability to replace landscaping with drought resistant or low water use plants, in order to lower expenses of the District. The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows: Site # Descriptive Location J-2 The monument at the northeast corner of Haven and 4th Street. Ground Cover area: 5,715 square feet Turf area: 6,068 square feet J-3 The 6th street median from Milliken to Pittsburg. Ground Cover area: 3,300 square feet J-4 The entry monuments on the east and west side of 4th and Milliken. Ground Cover area: 19,771 square feet Turt area 9,060 square feet J-5 The Milliken median from Arrow to Jersey Ground Cover area: 10,220 square feet J-6 The Spruce median from Foothill to White Oak. Ground Cover area: 4,300 square feet J-7 The 6th Street median from Pittsburg to Richmond. Ground Cover area: 5,114 square feet J-8 The 6th Street median from Richmond to Buffalo. Ground Cover area: 2,476 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B -City of Rancho Cucamonga Prepared by NBS -Fiscal Year 2011112 J-9 The Milliken railroad underpass Ground Cover area: 165,633 square feet 12-12-01 added 5199 sq feet Turf area: 4,897 square feet J-10 The 6th street median from Cleveland to 1,820 feet east of Cleveland. Ground Cover area: 13,310 square feet J-11 The 6th Street median from Buffalo to Rochester. Ground cover area: 12,400 square feet J-12 The Milliken median from Arrow to Century. Ground Cover area: 13,855 square feet J-13 The Milliken median from Century to Foothill Blvd. Ground Cover area: 3,330 square feet J-14 The 6th Street median from Utica to Cleveland. Ground Cover area: 8,559 square feet J-15 The 6th Street median form Haven to Utica. Ground Cover area: 7,680 square feet. J-16 Day Creek median from Church to Foothill. Ground cover area: 8,466 square feet `Site was 2-9 and maintained by TruGreen. Now maintained by Mariposa. J-17 The Day Creek medians south of Foothill including the traffic circle. Ground cover area: 6,490 square feet `Site was 2-10 and maintained by TruGreen. Now maintained by Mariposa. H-1 The Haven median from 4th Street to 6th Street. Ground cover area: 12,270 square feet Turt area: 8,935 square feet H-2 The Haven medians from 6th Street to the underpass bridge. The east and west side parkways and slopes on Haven from Acacia Street to underpass bridge. Ground cover area: 51,760 square feet Turf area: 2,960 square feet 'Site increased on 9-22-10 due to Haven Underpass Project. H-3 The Haven medians from underpass bridge to Arrow Route. The east and west side parkways and slopes on Haven from the underpass bridge to Jersey Blvd... Ground cover area: 53,181 square feet Turt area: 3,029 square feet *Site increased on 9-22-10 due to Haven Underpass Project. H-4 The Haven median from Arrow Route to Foothill. Ground cover area: 8,348 square feet Turf area: 6,808 square feet FH-1 The Foothill median from Spruce to Haven. Ground cover area: 4,571 square feet The total square footage for the improvement is 9,141; however, due to the location of the improvement the other half is maintained by LMD 4-R. FH-2 The Foothill median from Spruce to Milliken. Ground cover area: 7,940 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 36 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 6 Prepared by NBS -Fiscal Year 2011/12 The total square footage for the improvement is 15,879; however, due to the location of the improvement the other half is maintained by LMD 4-R. FH-3 The Foothill median from 790 feet west of Market Place to Market Place. Ground cover area: 4,434 square feet FH-4 The Foothill median from Market Place to Etiwanda. Ground cover area: 10,392 square feet FH-5 The Foothill median from 360 feet west of Masi Dr. to 516 feet west of Masi Dr. Ground cover area: 800 square feet The total square footage for the improvement is 1,600; however, due to the location of the improvement the other half is maintained by LMD 4-R. Map of Improvements The following page shows the map of landscaping improvements, including irrigation sites and community trails, to be maintained using District funds. Landscape Maintenance District No. 38 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Prepared by NBS -Fiscal Year 2011/12 Z~ ~ o `o s`r~~, m W M ny epuernP3 Q Z r V .` ~ N ~ ~ V ^^ ` ~ ^^ ^ ^ L Y A\Y w V/ W F_ O • ~ ~. C G ntl uaneH Q (~ ntl esouuaH (a ntl PIeQ!VwV J ntl uewllaH iS xz U~ Z~<} V ny Vil l llW ~ T 9 q w a m m m t S ~i N II M II ' 7 I I .~ I ~ o~n'I A J q F d y U ~ W ~ ~ d Z W W ~ U W Z ~ Z W 2 O ~ O W ~ Q U m C9 W C9 Y ~!- "~ O w ~ ~ ~ d d ~ ~ LL ts~ II ~ ~ O I II 1 II j II j„~ Isp3 Ul I ~ ~ st-I M 1 N { uaneH r puuaH lI7 O V!VO+H 0 ~` 1 ~- ~ Y Q\ ~ yP,aRap~ \~ I. OO /~ \ ~ ~ e s~~sgo 5 O a Pafr°8$ ~e2$.Fs= ~ . ~.. \\ c~ess F,F€mE€a gF s c rn~M ntl enw~ `~@Fm~5e g;Sa~~S m a y ~°¢~ pP S~Q m ~ m E¢o~c3~~E~F°c mac. pp m8 @$~g88sogEFE ~~~&: ;u' ue pSm'~T+~oS€'c n~9 nm~n g ga 8c$~~E 54y¢F^o c9.i gm~ yY$g5g ~,~~g`~op gg ~9 n~~ €c~uB ~F EcED ~s5~4F~gg~ag~~e:~z ESTIMATE OF COSTS The estimated costs of administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing the improvements as described in the Plans and Specifications are summarized below. Each year, as part of the assessment district levy calculation process, the costs and expenses are reviewed and the annual costs are projected for the fallowing fiscal year. District Budget Estimated 2011/12 Bud et Personnel Services Regular Payroll $313,880.00 Overtime Salaries 2,630.00 Part-time Salaries 53,700.00 Fringe Benefits 153.140.00 Subtotal Personnel $523,350.00 Operations and Maintenance Operations and Maintenance $58,900.00 Operations and Maintenance/Facilities 8,500.00 Vehicle Operations and Maintenance 1,500.00 Emergency Equipment and Vehicle Rental 2,000.00 Equipment Operations and Maintenance 12,000.00 Contract Services 402,340.00 Contract Services/Facilities 128,500.00 Tree Maintenance 21,850.00 Utilities Telephone Utilities 1,420.00 Water Utilities 70,750.00 Electric Utilities 35,950.00 Assessment Administration 6,170.00 General Overhead 68.990.00 Subtotal Operations and Maintenance $818,870.00 Capital Expenditures Caoital Projects $30.000.00 Subtotal Capital Expenditures $30,000.00 Total Expenditure Budget $1,372,220.00 Total Estimated Assessment $980,970.00 Less Anticipated Delinquencies ~ (43.650.001 Total Estimated Revenue $937,320.00 Plus Operating Reserve Fund Contribution 434.900.00 Total Expenditure Budget $1,372,220.00 Total Estimated Assessment $980,970.00 Total District EBU Count 2780.52 Actual Assessment per EBU -Fiscal Year 2011/12 $352.80 M ximum Allow A sessmen - F' r 2 Landscape Maintenance District No. 36 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Prepared by NBS -Fiscal Year 2011/12 The maximum allowable assessment per EBU listed in the District budget above, is the amount which was approved in 1996/97 and subsequent District annexations. Each year, prior to the assessmehts being placed on the tax roll, the City will review the budget and determine the amount needed to maintain the improvements for the upcoming fiscal year. The actual assessment per EBU will be based on the estimated costs of maintenance, available fund balance and maximum allowable assessment with the goal of maintaining the improvements in a satisfactory and healthy condition. The actual assessment amount may be lower than the maximum allowable assessment; however it may not exceed the maximum unless the increase is approved by the property owners in accordance with Proposition 218. It is the intent of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to maintain an Operating Reserve which shall not exceed the estimated costs of maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or when the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The reserve balance information for the District is as follows: Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2011 Reserve Fund Balance $1,110,19D.00 Operating Reserve Contribution -Fiscal Year 2011/12 (434,900.00) Ooerating Reserve Collection -Fiscal Year 2011/12 0.00 Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2012 Reserve Fund Balance $675,290.00 Definitions of Budget Items The following definitions describe the costs and expenses included in the District Budget: Personnel Services Regular Salaries: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all full-time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Part Time Salaries: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all part time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Fringe Benefits: This item includes the benefits available to City employees: health care, vacation, sick time, and retirement fund. Operations and Maintenance Contract Services: This item includes the contract costs of a landscape maintenance company responsible for the ongoing maintenance of the District improvements. Tree Maintenance: This item includes the contract costs attributed to maintaining the street trees and other trees throughout the District. Utilities -Water: This item includes the costs to furnish water for the landscaping within the District. Utilities -Electric: This item includes the costs to furnish electricity required for the operation and maintenance of the sprinklers and irrigation controllers. Assessment Administration: This item includes the cost to all particular departments and staff of the City, and consultants for providing the administration, coordination and management of District services, operations, and incidental expenses related to the District. This item also includes creation of an annual engineer's report, resolutions and placing the assessment amounts onto the County tax Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B -City of Rancho Cucamonga Prepared by NBS -Fiscal Year 2011112 roll each year, along with responding to any public inquiries and future Proposition 218 balloting proceedings. General Overhead: This item includes the casts of all departments and staff of the City for providing the coordination of District services, inspections, annual bid management, responding to public concerns, public education, accounting, auditing and procedural matters associated with the District. This item also includes an allocation for general City staff time for administrative functions and systems that provide for a functional and operational assessment district within the City's administrative structure. Capital Expenditures: Capital Projects: This item includes new improvements to further enhance the level and quality of service provided within the boundaries of the District. This may include new monuments, irrigation systems, and other large improvements. Operating Reserve Collection: Ooerating Reserve Collection: This item includes the amount to be collected to maintain reserves to enable the City to pay for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or whenever the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The Reserve Fund contribution will continue until such a time the Reserve Fund balance is approximately one half of the annual costs. The fund may be allowed to accumulate in anticipation of any unforeseen expenses not included in the yearly maintenance costs. This may include, but is not limited to, tree replacements, repair of damaged equipment due to vandalism, storms and other similar events. Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B -City of Rancho Cucamonga 10 Prepared by NBS -Fiscal Year 2011/12 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT General Pursuant to the 1972 Act and Article XIIID, all parcels that have a special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements and services shall be identified, and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel shall be determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of improvements. The 1972 Act, permits the establishment of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include the operation, maintenance and servicing of landscaping improvements. Section 22573 of the 1972 Act requires that maintenance assessments must be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. This Section states: "The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district maybe apportioned by any formula or method which faidy distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements." The determination of whether or not a lot or parcel will benefit from the improvements shall be made pursuant to the Improvement Act of 1911 (Division 7 (commencing with Section 5000) (of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California]." The 1972 Act also permits the designation of zones of benefit within any individual assessment district if "by reasons or variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive different degrees of benefit from the improvement" (Sec. 22547). Article XIIID, Section 4(a) of the California Constitution limits the amount of any assessment to the proportional special benefit conferred on the property. Article XIIID also provides that publicly owned properties must be assessed unless there is clear and convincing evidence that those properties receive no special benefit from the assessment. Exempted from the assessment would be the areas of public streets, public avenues, public lanes, public roads, public drives, public courts, public alleys, public easements and rights-of-ways, public greenbelts and public parkways. The net amount to be assessed may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels. Proposition 218, approved by the voters in November 1996, requires the City to separate general benefit from special benefit, where only special benefit is assessed. Special Benefit The maintenance and servicing of the improvements within the District (which are described in the Description of Services and Improvements Section of this report) are for the benefit of the properties within the District, and as such confer a special and direct benefit to parcels within the District by: • improving the livability, appearance, and desirability for properties within the boundaries of the District, and • ensuring that improvements do not reach a state of deterioration or disrepair so as to be materially detrimental to properties within the District, and Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B -City of Rancho Cucamonga 11 Fiscal Year 2011/12 • providing beautification, shade and overall enhancement to properties within the District. The above mentioned items affect the assessed property in a way that is particular and distinct from their effect on other parcels and that real property in general and the public at large do not share. They contribute to a specific enhancement of the properties within the District. Since these improvements, including the community trails, were installed and are maintained specifically for the properties within the District; only properties within the District receive a special benefit and are assessed for said maintenance. General Benefit In addition to the special benefits received by parcels within the District, there are derivative general benefits that are conferred on parcels outside the boundaries of the District which include: • the control of dust and insect infestations, and • the visual enhancement of the area to persons or vehicles that may travel through the District. However it has been determined that these benefits are derivative and do not provide a direct benefit to parcels outside of the district that are not being assessed. Method of Assessment Each of the parcels within the District is deemed to receive special benefit from the improvements. Each parcel that has a special benefit conferred upon it as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements are identified and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel is determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of the improvements. When the District was formed in 1984, Article XIIID and Proposition 218 had not yet been passed. Upon the passage of Article XIIID and the subsequent passage of the Proposition Omnibus Implementation Act, new rules were put into place. Due to the changes in legal requirements, as property annexed to the District after the passage of the Assessment Law, the description of the method of assessment became more refined, however, the assessment per parcel has remained the same since the 1996/97 Fiscal Year. Further, no parcel included in the District formation or annexations prior to when the language was refined, are now being levied differently than they were at the time the District was formed or the parcels were annexed. To assess special benefit appropriately, it is necessary to relate the different type of parcel improvements to each other. The Equivalent Benefit Unit ("EBU") method of apportionment uses the single family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single family home equals one Equivalent Benefit Unit (EBU). Every other land-use is converted to EBUs based on an assessment formula that equates to the property's specific development status, type of development (land-use), and size of the property, as compared to a single family home. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land-use types, as assigned by County use code, to determine each parcel's EBU assignment. Lantl-Use Equivalent Dwelling Units Pro ert T e Count Use Code EBU Value Multi lier Non-Residential 1.00 Acre Landscape Maintenance District No. 38 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 12 Fiscal Year 2011/12 The use of the latest County Assessor's Secured Roll shall be the basis for the Property Type determination and units/acreage assignments, unless better data is available to the City. In addition, if any parcel within the District is identified by the County Auditor/Controller to be an invalid parcel number for the current fiscal year, the Property Type and EBU assignment shall be based on the correct parcel number and/or new parcel number(s) County use code and subsequent property information. If a single parcel has changed to multiple parcels, the EBU assignment and assessment amount applied to each of the new parcels will be recalculated rather than spread the proportionate share of the original assessment. The following table summarizes the Fiscal Year 2011/12 maximum allowable assessment rates for the District: Property Type Maximum Allowable Actual (County Use Code) Assessment Rate Assessment Rate Total Total er EBU er EBU Units/Acres EBUs Non-Residential $352.80 $352.80 2,780.52 2,780.52 The total amount of maintenance and incidental costs for maintaining the landscaping and community trail improvements is assessed to the individual parcels of real property within the District in proportion to the special benefit received by such parcels of real property. The proposed individual assessments are shown on the assessment roll in this report. Landscape Maintenance District No. 38 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 13 Fiscal Year 2011/12 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM An Assessment Diagram for the District is shown on the following page. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the County Assessor of the County San Bernardino, at the time this report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Engineer's Report. Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B -City of Rancho Cucamonga 14 Fiscai Year 2011/12 m M ~~ y., N •i `I ~~ m J ~1 Q ~ ~_ ~ ~ o~ N '~~- ny tiia4~ ~ ~ y . ~ ~ ~ V i .._.._.._.._' ~ J ~'f o i N NN • i ~ C J m ~ o N O ^C, y ! N ~ CO __ L o O 1 `O Q ® nV lse3 in ~ i v C ~ i ny epuenn!;3 ny epuen~!i3 ~ _ .~ ! ~~~ ~ _ C` ~8 ~aa~~ ~(ep .. ._.._.._.._.._.._ _..F ~ ~ ny ~a~sayoob ~ ny ia~sayooa J ~..: i _ ny ua~!II!W f._.._.._.._.._ _~} ~ ny ua~!II!W ny uaneH ny uaneH ny esow~aH ny esow~aH nV Ple4!4o~V nV PIeQ!4o~V ny uewllaH N ny uewllaH ~ L L ny p e~(au ~ ln ~g uellawe~ f ~~Eii aaa i~'f5cC g f 17 9 4 fi~dyfyf£~p ! s'4fi ~ `s' ' g a ~ ~ e fl1 ~ nyana~ (n ~ 5 ~gq§q 9a€ ea Y=t~ C€ 2 ; ~ N ~ - $$s~§°s~f ae~S ~ ~ c m O LL Q °0~~g fY.a~s~~ v c .N m _ ~s~~s~6~flff ,€~~ fiGE~§~~. = m a g90a" Fe~s 4~; €' f Q E Y pug°Eg pYissF. _< ~aa~f~s~°s~~p r ASSESSMENT ROLL Assessment Roll The assessment roll is a listing of the assessment for Fiscal Year 2011/12 apportioned to each lot or parcel, as shown on the last equalized roll of the Assessor of the County of San Bernardino. The following tables summarize the Fiscal Year 2011/12 maximum and actual assessments for the District: Maximum Allowable Maximum Property Type Assessment Rate Total Total Allowable Count Use Code er EBU Units/Acres EBUs Assessment Non-Residential $352.80 2,780.52 2,780.52 $980,970.00 Actual Property Type Assessment Rate Total Total Actual Count Use Code er EBU Units/Acres EBUs Assessment Non-Residential $352.50 2,780.52 2,780.52 $980,970.00 A copy of the full assessment roll is available for review in the City Clerk's office. Annexations The following annexations are effective for the 2011/12 Fiscal Year: Assessor's Parcel Number Annexation Date Pro'ect Total Units/Acres Total EBUs Property Type Count Use Code 0229-141-15 05/19/2010 DRC2006-00580 1.76 Acres 1.76 Commercial 1061-621-29 12/01/2010 DRC2009-00586 1.O6Acres 1.06 Commercial 0209-491-04 12/15/2010 DRC2007-00247 2.00 Acres 2.00 Commercial 0209-491-05 12/15/2010 DRC2007-00247 1.70 acres 1.70 Commercial Landscape Maintenance District No. 38 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 15 Fiscal Year 2011 /12 Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2011/2012 City of Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 4-R (Caryn Planned Community) CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 6 (CARYN PLANNED COMMUNITY) 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Phone: 909.477.2700 Fax: 909.477.2741 CITY COUNCIL L. Dennis Michael, Mayor Sam Spagnolo, Mayor Pro Tem William Alexander, Council Member Chuck Buquet, Council Member Diane Williams, Council Member CITY STAFF John R. Gillison, Assistant City Manager Linda D. Daniels, Deputy City Manager William Wittkopf, Public Works Director Ingrid Y. Bruce, GIS/Special Districts Manager Christopher Bopko, Management Analyst III TABLE OF CONTENTS ENGINEER'S LETTER INTRODUCTION 1 3 Reason for Assessment .............................................................................................3 Process for Annual Assessment .................................................................................3 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS 5 Description of the Boundaries of the District ...............................................................5 Description of Improvements and Services ................................................................5 Map of Improvements ...............................................................................................11 ESTIMATE OF COSTS 12 District Budget ..........................................................................................................12 Definitions of Budget Items .......................................................................................13 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT 15 General .....................................................................................................................15 Special Benefit .........................................................................................................15 General Benefit ........................................................................................................16 Method of Assessment Spread ................................................................................16 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM ASSESSMENT ROLL 18 19 Assessment Roll .......................................................................................................19 Annexations ..............................................................................................................19 ENGINEER'S LETTER WHEREAS, on July 6, 2011, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga (the "City"), under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 (the "1972 Act") adopted its Resolution No.11-098 a Resolution Initiating Proceedings for the Levy of Annual Assessments for Landscape Maintenance District No. 6 (Caryn Planned Community) (the "District"); and WHEREAS, the Resolution Initiating Proceedings directed staff to prepare and file an Engineer's Report for Fiscal Year 2011/12 pursuant to the requirements of the 1972 Act. The Engineer's Report presents the plans and specifications describing the general nature, location and extent of the improvements to be maintained, an estimate of the costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements for the District for the referenced fiscal year, a diagram for the District, showing the area and properties proposed to be assessed, and an assessment of the estimated costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing the improvements, assessing the net amount upon all assessable lots and/or parcels within the District in proportion to the special benefit received; and NOW THEREFORE, the following assessment is proposed to be authorized in order to pay the estimated costs of maintenance, operation and servicing of the improvements to be paid by the assessable real property within the boundaries of the District in proportion to the special benefit received. The following table summarizes the proposed assessment. SUMMARY OF ASSESSMENT Fiscal Year 2011/12 Total Estimated Assessment $2,498,140.00 Less Anticipated Delinquencies 119 270.00 Total Estimated Revenue $2,378,870..00 Plus Reserve Fund Contribution 40,130.00 Total Expenditure Budget $2,419,000.00 Total District EBU Count 6,574.05 Actual Assessment per EBU $380.00 Maximum Allowable Assessment per EBU $380.00 In making the assessments contained herein pursuant to the 1972 Act: I have identified all parcels which will have a special benefit conferred upon them from the improvements described in the Special Benefit Section of this Engineer's Report (the "Specially Benefited Parcels"). For particulars as to the identification of said parcels, reference is made to the Assessment Diagram, a copy of which is included in this Engineer's Report. 2. I have evaluated the costs and expenses of the improvements upon the Specially Benefited Parcels. In making such evaluation: Landscape Maintenance District No. 4-R -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2011 /12 a. The proportionate special benefit derived by each Specially Benefited Parcel from the improvements was determined in relationship to the entirety of the maintenance costs of the improvements; b. No assessment has been imposed on any Specially Benefited Parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on such parcel from the improvements; and c. Any general benefits from the improvements have been separated from the special benefits and only special benefits have been assessed. I, the undersigned, respectfully submit the enclosed Engineer's Report and, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, the Engineer's Report, Assessments, and the Assessment Diagram herein have been prepared and computed in accordance with the order of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Assessment Law. Landscape Maintenance District No. 4-R -City of Rancho Cucamonga 2 Fiscal Year 2011/12 INTRODUCTION Reason for Assessment Approval of the assessment covered by this Engineer's Report will generate the revenue necessary to: Provide for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements described in this Engineer's Report. Maintenance may include but is not limited to, all of the following: the repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement, providing for the life, growth, health and beauty of the landscaping, including cultivation, irrigation, trimming, spraying, fertilizing or treating for disease or injury, the removal of trimming, rubbish, debris and other solid waste, the maintenance, repair and replacement as necessary of all irrigation systems and the removal of graffiti from walls immediately adjacent to the cultivated areas. Servicing means the furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operating and servicing of any improvement. Servicing shall also include vehicle, equipment, capital improvements and administrative costs associated with the annual administration and operation of the District. Process for Annual Assessment The City cannot levy and collect annual assessments within the District without complying with the procedures specified in the 1972 Act. On an annual basis, an Engineer's Report must be prepared which contains a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the district. The City Council must also adopt a resolution of intention which: • Declares the intention of the City Council to levy and collect assessments within the assessment district for the fiscal year stated therein. • Generally describes the existing and proposed improvements and any substantial changes proposed to be made in existing improvements. • Refers to the assessment district by its distinctive designation and indicate the general location of the district. • Refers to the report of the engineer, on file with the clerk, for a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the district. • Gives notice of the time and place for public hearing by the City Council on the levy of the proposed assessment. • States whether the assessment is proposed to increase from the previous year. If the assessments are to be levied in the same or lesser amounts than the maximum assessment amount approved, the clerk shall give notice by causing the resolution of intention to be published. Any interested person may, prior to the conclusion of the public hearing, file a written protest which shall state all grounds of objection. The protest shall contain a description sufficient to identify the property owned by the property owner filing the protest. During the course or upon conclusion of the hearing, the City Council may order changes in any of the matters provided in the report, including changes in the improvements, any zones within the assessment district, and the proposed diagram or the proposed assessment. The City Council, upon conclusion of the public hearing must then adopt a resolution confirming the diagram and assessment, either as originally proposed or as changed by it. The adoption of the resolution shall constitute the levy of an assessment for the fiscal year referred to in the assessment. Landscape Maintenance District No. 4-R -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2011/12 If the assessment to be levied exceeds the maximum assessment amount previously approved, the City must comply with the procedures specified in Article XIII D and Proposition 218. The voters in the State of California in November 1996 added Article XIII D to the California Constitution imposing, among other requirements, the necessity for the City to conduct an assessment ballot procedure to enable the owners of each property on which assessments are proposed to be enacted or increased, the opportunity to express their support for, or opposition to the proposed assessment or increase in such assessment. The basic steps of the assessment ballot procedure are outlined below. The City must prepare a Notice of Public Hearing ("Notice"), which describes, along with other mandated information, the reason for the proposed assessments, and to provide a date and time of a public hearing to be held on the matter. The City must also prepare an assessment ballot, which clearly gives the property owner the ability to sign and mark their assessment ballot either in favor of, or in opposition to the proposed assessment. The Notice and assessment ballot are mailed to each affected property owner within the District a minimum of 45 days prior to the public hearing date as shown in the Notice. The City may also hold community meetings with the property owners to discuss the issues facing the District and to answer property owner questions directly. After the Notice and assessment ballot are mailed, property owners are given until the close of the public hearing, stated in the Notice, to return their signed and marked assessment ballot. During the public hearing, property owners are given the opportunity to address the City Council and ask questions or voice their concerns. At the public hearing, the returned assessment ballots received prior to the close of the public hearing are tabulated, weighted by the proposed assessment amount on each property and the results are announced by the City Council. Article XIII D provides that if, as a result of the assessment ballot proceeding, a majority protest is found to exist, the City Council shall not have the authority to levy and collect the assessments as proposed. A majority protest exists if the assessments represented by ballots submitted in opposition exceed those submitted in favor of the assessment. All returned ballots are tabulated and weighted according to the financial obligation of each particular parcel. If there is no majority protest as described above, the City Council may approve the proposed assessments. If there is a majority protest, as described above, the City will not levy and collect any assessments. Landscape Maintenance District No. 4-R -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2011 /12 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS The District provides for the administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing of various improvements located within the public right-of-way and dedicated easements within the boundaries of the District. Description of the Boundaries of fhe District The District is located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California. The boundaries of the District are generally described as that area located north of Foothill Boulevard, west of Rochester Avenue, east of Haven Avenue, south of Base Line Road and includes the northeast corner of Base Line Road and Haven Avenue. Reference is also made to the Assessment Diagram included in this Report. Description of Improvements and Services The improvements are the maintenance and servicing of the paseos, parkways, median islands, street trees, parks, landscaped sites and appurtenant facilities that are throughout the Terra Vista Planned Community. These improvements are located within the street right-of-ways, dedicated public easements and parks which are within the boundaries of the District. The landscaping maintenance includes, but is not limited to, the pruning, fertilizing, mowing, weeding, pest control, removal of trash/debris, and irrigation of the trees, shrubs, vines, ground cover, and turf. Maintenance of associated improvements, including the parks and irrigation systems, includes but is not limited to, grading and replacement of trail surfacing, trail fence repair and replacement, and irrigation systems control, adjustment, repair and replacement. Services include personnel, materials, contracting services, utilities, and all necessary costs associated with the maintenance, replacement and repair required to keep the improvements in a healthy, vigorous and satisfactory condition. The 38 acres of parks consist of Spruce Park, Mountain View Park, Ralph M. Lewis Park, Coyote Canyon Park, Milliken Park and West Greenway Park. In addition, it is the City's intention to continue to use cost effective materials, including the future ability to replace landscaping with drought resistant or low water use plants, in order to lower expenses of the District. The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows: The street trees within the residential parkways and tree maintenance easements to be maintained by the District are on the following streets, located within the boundaries of the District: Amiata Dr Bastia Ct Blackhorse Ct Brandywine PI Bunkerhill Dr Cedarbrook PI Chesterton Dr Claridge PI Clarisa PI Corsica Ct (Countryview to Milliken) Countryview (Mt. View to Palacio) Covington PI Danbury Dr DannerCt De Anza Dr Derby PI Downing Ct Ellena Wy (s/o Terra Vista to Fitzpatrick) Emery PI Fitzpatrick Dr Fulbourn Ct Hinton Ct Linaro Rd Meyers Dr Potomac Ct Radcliff PI Regent Dr Rockingham Ct Sarzanza PI Southhampton Ct Terra Vista Pky (Church to Brandywine) Wellington PI Yorktown Ct Landscape Maintenance District No. 4-R -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2011/12 The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows: Site # Descriptive Location N-1 The Base Line median from Haven to the Deer Creek Channel. Ground Cover area: 16,613 square feet Turf area: 19,030 square feet Hardscape area: 23,650 square feet Due to the location of the improvements, an additional 2,769 square feet of ground cover area and 1,478 square feet of turf area of the median are maintained by the City, however that portion is not funded by the District and instead funded by the City's General Fund. N-2 The Base Line median from Spruce to the Deer Creek Channel. Ground Cover area: 13,504 square feet Turt area: 16,109 square feet Hardscape area: 12,575 square feet Due to the location of the improvements, an additional 2,749 square feet of ground cover area and 1,598 square feet of turf area of the median are maintained by the City, however that portion is not funded by the District and instead funded by the City's General Fund. N-3 The Base Line median from Spruce to Milliken. Ground Cover area: 8,418 square feet Turf area: 13,573 square feet Hardscape area: 16,567 square feet Due to the location of the improvements, an additional 5,247 square feet of ground cover area and 4,289 square feet of turf area of the median are maintained by the City, however that portion is not funded by the District and instead funded by the City's General Fund. N-4 The south side of Base Line from 800 feet east of Spruce to Milliken. The cul-de-sac at the north end of Cascade. Ground Cover area: 9,278 square feet Turf area: 12,659 square feet Hardscape area: 7,950 square feet N-5 The north side of Terra Vista Parkway from Belpine to 112 feet west of Butterfield; Terra Vista Parkway median from Spruce to Milliken and the south side of Terra Vista Parkway from 164 feet west of Belpine to Belpine. Ground Cover area: 13,411 square feet Turf area: 6,555 square feet Hardscape area: 12,978 square feet N-6 The north side of Terra Vista Parkway from Spruce to 175 feet north of Countryside and Terra Vista Parkway median from Church to Spruce. Ground Cover area: 17,991 square feet Turf area: 11,413 square feet Hardscape area: 11,452 square feet N-7 The north side of Church from the Deer Creek Channel to Terra Vista Parkway. The west side of Terra Vista Parkway from Church to 175 feet north of Countryside. Ground Cover area: 9,924 square feet Turt area: 5,378 square feet Hardscape area: 6,426 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 4-R -City of Rancho Cucamonga 6 Fiscal Year 2011112 TV-8 The southeast corner of Church and Haven; the Church median from Haven to Terra Vista Parkway and the wash end on the Northwest corner of the Deer Creek Channel and Church. Ground Cover area: 26,876 square feet Turt area: 2,306 square feet Hardscape area: 2,788 square feet TV-9 The Church median from Terra Vista Parkway to Elm. Ground Cover area: 7,829 square feet Hardscape area: 6,605 square feet TV-10 The east side of Valencia from Base Line to the pre-school; the south side of Augusta from Valencia to Meadow Lark and the west side of Summerfield from Valencia to Evergreen. Ground Cover area: 20,818 square feet Turf area: 18,634 square feet Hardscape area: 8,666 square feet TV-11 The paseo at Parkside and Clover from Parkside to the Deer Creek Channel. Ground Cover area: 2,795 square feet Hardscape area: 1,049 square feet TV-12 The east side of Haven from the pre-school to the Southern Pacific Railroad. Ground Cover area: 6,170 square feet Turf area: 2,091 square feet Hardscape area: 1,060 square feet TV-13 The east side of Spruce from Elm to Mountain View; the north and south sides of Norfolk from Spruce to Cardiff; the south side of Mountain View from Spruce to 290 feet east of Belvedere and the paseo from Spruce to Countryview. Ground Cover area: 8,459 square feet Turf area: 3,355 square feet Hardscape area: 8,886 square feet TV-14 The south side of Mountain View from 290 feet east of Belvedere to 590 feet east of Fairhaven; the paseo south of Mountain View between Belvedere and Fairhaven to Country View and from Countryview Drive to West Greenway Corridor. Ground Cover area: 19,030 square feet Turf area: 8,430 square feet Hardscape area: 9,262 square feet TV-15 The north side of Mountain View from 634 feet west of Biarritz to Milliken. Ground Cover area: 4,571 square feet Turf area: 4,738 square feet Hardscape area: 5,104 square feet TV-16 The west Greenway Corridor from the northeast corner of Elm and Spruce to West Greenway. Ground Cover area: 15,529 square feet Turt area: 20,884 square feet Hardscape area: 20,626 square feet TV-17 The west side of Milliken from 585 feet north of Mountain View to Mountain View. Ground Cover area: 5,835 square feet Turt area: 3,564 square feet Hardscape area: 2,340 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 4-R -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2011/12 N-18 The south side of Mountain View from approximately 250 feet west of Claridge to Terra Vista Parkway. The south side of Terra Vista Parkway from Mountain View to East Greenway Corridor. Terra Vista Parkway from Mountain View to East Greenway Corridor. Ground Cover area: 18,316 square feet Turf area: 5,944 square feet Hardscape area: 23,800 square feet N-19 The Terra Vista Parkway median from Milliken to Mountain View. The north side of Terra Vista Parkway from 68 feet north of Addison to Mountain View. The west side of Mountain View from Grapevine to Terra Vista Parkway. Ground Cover area: 20,306 square feet Turf area: 3,886 square feet Hardscape area: 11,478 square feet N-20 The Church median from Milliken to 675 feet east of Milliken. Ground Cover area: 2,860 square feet Hardscape area: 2,112 square feet N-21 The Church median from Milliken to Spruce. Ground Cover area: 16,811 square feet Turt area: 335 square feet Hardscape area: 14,880 square feet N-22 The Milliken median from Mountain View to Foothill. Ground Cover area: 16,436 square feet Hardscape area: 16,267 square feet N-23 The Milliken underpass from West Greenway Park to Milliken Park. Ground Cover area: 19,271 square feet Turf area: 22,139 square feet Hardscape area: 18,119 square feet N-24 The east side of Haven from 145 feet south of Creekbridge to 600 feet north of Creekbridge; the north side of Creekbridge from Brookside to Haven and the paseo from Creekbridge and Brookside to the Deer Creek Channel. Ground Cover area: 5,851 square feet Turt area: 9,965 square feet Hardscape area: 4,351 square feet N-25 The east side of Haven from 145 feet south of Creekbridge to 410 feet south of Creekbridge. Ground Cover area: 3,319 square feet Turf area: 1,677 square feet Hardscape area: 1,779 square feet N-26 The paseo at Plymouth south of Essex from Plymouth to the Deer Creek Channel. Ground Cover area: 1,956 square feet Hardscape area: 2,385 square feet N-27 The paseo from Terra Vista Parkway to Windsong and from Windsong to Plymouth. Ground Cover area: 2,270 square feet Turf area: 2,731 square feet Hardscape area: 3,332 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 4-R -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2011/12 N-28 The paseo at 7552 Hardy Ground Cover area: 630 square feet Turf area: 733 square feet Hardscape area: 432 square feet N-29 The East Greenway Corridor from Milliken Park to Terra Vista Parkway, including the turf area at the entrance to Tract 16157. Ground Cover area: 17,780 square feet Turf area: 52,403 square feet Hardscape area: 29,888 square feet N-30 The Milliken Median from Mountain View to Base Line. Ground Cover area: 11,890 square feet Hardscape area: 10,260 square feet N-31 The paseo from Elm to West Greenway Park. Ground Cover area: 4,770 square feet Hardscape area: 8,900 square feet N-32 The Greenwich paseo from Greenwich to Muirfield. Ground Cover area: 1,323 square feet Hardscape area: 1,456 square feet N-33 The south side of Mountain View from 430 feet west of Country View to Country View. Ground Cover area: 3,434 square feet Turf area: 1,853 square feet Hardscape area: 1,720 square feet N-34 The south side of Terra Vista Parkway from 390 feet west of Belpine to Belpine. Ground Cover area: 1,342 square feet Turf area: 1,887 square feet Hardscape area: 1,612 square feet N-35 The Trail Northeast of Ruth Musser School from Terra Vista Parkway to Spruce. Ground Cover area: 9,285 square feet Hardscape area: 5,148 square feet N-36 The north side Meyers from Emery Place to Elm. Ground Cover area: 9,141 square feet Turf area: 5,895 square feet Hardscape area: 6,058 square feet N-37 The north side of Meyers from Emery Place to Elm. Ground Cover area: 5,860 square feet Turf area: 5,300 square feet Hardscape area: 1,283 square feet N-38 The Church median from Rochester to Terra Vista Parkway median from Church to 853 north of Church. Ground Cover area: 8,510 square feet Hardscape area: 5,640 square feet N-39 The north side of Mountain View from 250 feet east of Milliken to Milliken. The eastside of Milliken from Mountain View to Terra Vista Parkway. Ground Cover area: 16,751 square feet Hardscape area: 15,716 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 4-R -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2011/12 N-40 The south side of Terra Vista Parkway from Milliken to Mountain View. Ground Cover area: 11,630 square feet Hardscape area: 19,738 square feet N-41 The south side of Terra Vista Parkway from Milliken to Mountain View. Ground Cover area: 4,081 square feet Hardscape area: 9,640 square feet N-42 The north side of Mountain View from Terra Vista Parkway to 250 feet east of Milliken. Ground Cover area: 10,994 square feet Hardscape area: 14,777 square feet N-43 Church median and parkway from Malaga to Terra Vista Parkway. Ground Cover area: 7,506 square feet Hardscape area: 3,955 square feet N-44 The south side of Church from Terra Vista Parkway to Rochester. Ground Cover area: 10,400 square feet Hardscape area: 7,606 square feet N-45 The west side of Rochester from Church to Malaga. Ground Cover area: 20,693 square feet Hardscape area: 12,450 square feet N-46 The north side of Malaga from Church to Rochester. Ground Cover area: 19,843 square feet Hardscape area: 18,000 square feet N-47 The eastside of Terra Vista Parkway from Church to Brandywine. The paseo from Brandywine to Bunker Hill Drive. The eastside of Radcliff from Bunker to Malada. Ground Cover area: 17,838 square feet Hardscape area: 9,023 square feet N-48 The Church median from 750 feet east of Milliken to Malaga Ave. Ground Cover area: 5,554 square feet Hardscape area: 9,698 square feet FH-1 The Foothill median from Spruce to Haven. Ground Cover area: 4,571 square feet The total square footage for the improvement is 9,141; however, due to the location of the improvement the other half is maintained by LMD 36. FH-2 The Foothill median from Spruce to Milliken. Ground Cover area: 7,940 square feet The total square footage for the improvement is 15,879; however, due to the location of the improvement the other half is maintained by LMD 3B. FH-5 The Foothill median from 360 feet west of Masi Dr. to 516 feet west of Masi Dr. Ground Cover area: 800 square feet The total square footage for the improvement is 1,600; however, due to the location of the improvement the other half is maintained by LMD 3B. H-5 The Haven median from Foothill to Church. Ground Cover area: 6,216 square feet Turf area: 5,286 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 4-R -City of Rancho Cucamonga 10 Fiscal Year 2011/12 The total square footage for the Ground Cover improvement is 12,432 and the Turf improvement square footage is 10,572; however, due to the location of the improvements the other half is maintained by LMD 36. H-6 Haven median from Church to Baseline. Ground Cover area: 5,306 square feet Turt area: 4,354 square feet The total square footage for the Ground Cover improvement is 10,612 and the Turf improvement square footage is 8,708; however, due to the location of the improvements the other half is maintained by LMD 3B H-7 The Haven median from Baseline to Southern Pacific railroad tracks. Ground Cover area: 2,980 square feet Turt area: 1,996 square feet The total square footage for the Ground Cover improvement is 5,960 and the Turf improvement square footage is 3,992; however, due to the location of the improvements the other half is maintained by LMD 36. VG-14 The Baseline median from Milliken to Ellena East. The turt and ground cover on the north side of Baseline from Ellena East to Ellena West. The turf and ground cover on the east side of Ellena West from Baseline and following the curb line to Kenyon. The north side of Ellena West from Kenyon to Casoli. The turf and ground cover on both sides of Casoli from Ellena West to Candela. The turt and ground cover on both sides of Crema Place from Ellena west to Candela. Ground Cover area: 9,169 square feet The total square footage for the Ground Cover improvements are 80,287, 62,999 square feet for Turt and 44,826 square feet for Hardscape; however, due to the location of the improvements, LMD 4-R maintains only the south side of the Base Line median from Milliken to Ellena East and the rest is maintained by LMD 2. VG-15 The turt and ground cover on the west side of Rochester from the Southern Pacific Railroad to Baseline. The turt and ground cover on the north side of Baseline from Rochester to Ellena East. The Baseline Median from Rochester to Ellena East. The turf and ground cover on the east side of Ellena east from Baseline and continuing along that curb line to 275 feet north of Berra Road. The turf and ground cover on both sides of Berra from Ellena East to Comiso. Ground Cover area: 3,960 square feet The total square footage for the Ground Cover improvements are 58,5887, 57,306 square feet for Turf and 36,014 square feet for Hardscape; however, due to the location of the improvements, LMD 4-R maintains only the south side of the Base Line median from Rochester to Ellena East and the rest is maintained by LMD 2. Map of Improvements The following page shows the map of landscaping improvements, including irrigation sites and community trails, to be maintained using District funds. Landscape Maintenance District No. 4-R -City of Rancho Cucamonga 11 Fiscal Year 2011/12 It J ' ;, I(11i1~1i1 ,I I Il~ll~)II'rtl((.I.! 711 II!li ~IIIIII II' IIII ~ ~ II ~ 11 ~ ~~ ~1 ~ ~ I ~,'~ II! II ( II I 111 I I ~ II I I II :, T~., / r ~ ~ = : ~I III I1~'~ ! ~'I Il'~"~~ 111 III' I~ i~~ll'll~ ~ III .I it it I~ :~~ r`i 1' ~Z I. i ,1 . .f;l~ll l i l ~ 1 ., J~ I 111 Ii.111i111'I!I'I .~ ,_~'t.7{/:' ~ ~I! ~ ~ 1' I" I' I II I ~ II.LI 1 ~ I ti a W _ __ ~ I q ; ~n r'nvaalsaH~oa W ~~ ~ r I W o o ~ $ { ~ I,1 A~ fl -~~ I . ~~~ i"- ~1 (, t "III~~II~_ .."~ ;'ti I I 7 w c? c9 x ° o w U ~I J,~+!\.~1~'~.,I1~ ~I ~~~J `~1 ~l 1~ z~~1 .1 ~ 1 ~{ ~y~ I O^D ~ I ~I~.111'I•~'/ <~rl ;)I;il~~ il'"1111.\ Z, ~`~ ~ ~ _ II ,~ ~ 1~ ~.~- ~ 'Ii' ~ i 3.~_ , I ~~i~l~ ,. ~.,~r~•~ 1.~'~~~1~7 ~~~~r.<,' "'~1II.I zQYI 1C., ~ z 7• i. ~ >~ ' 1 I ~ I I' "l :tea I ~~ 111 I. 'I ' '.~ r _ I ~i~ w .~ Ow :~-,11~ ~ ~I'Inll1~ I~~ III1 ~i~7}1Un,~l ,>~ :'.~t1~ .:~j1i 1~1111'I'' 'I~I'~ ~~ It~hll ~ ~, ,A` 1~ ~ `. ~ ~.~ - ~1 11 ~, ~~ r , ~ > ~ illllll,111 I I I I, rj I u Sig ~. ~~/ '~ ~ ~ I. ^~+. A A ~hl ~~ I•~I~ III."~~~i~,,!I~I I~~~ ~,¢,. IE-~yr ~ b ~;", Iv ', ~ z V v ~ I.-~ ~~ ~1, I. I j I \\ ~~• Inm r- /"~ /z ~( z Y~ ~ ~ - l~„ I~ li'~I /~l~'~~~C„111, 'm'om:/T~ , a ~1, Aj~~''~<l f ~'~ ~ 1 I ~ I'~ o • ~ f l I~ `~ it I I 1 ~ a l~`~ ~ \ I I ~ 1~ ~ U~. 1 lu~u.~ ~•~ ~ ~ ,~,.~, ~ mlA~ ~ _ - -~ ~i a ~ ~ 1 ,~ ~ ~~'; (~ U~ L horn 2>t! r`'Te~c ~ r ~' . r; > l ~ I lt'%zt~~~~i~~, 1 IB "~ ~ z ~ ' III,' ,1.. ~~~~ ~' ~. (. rr. ,I ~- - .~ r3 v ~4 u \ 1::~, J~ ~ IY ~~~- Ar 1r 1w O " ~ ~~~' I w 1 w Q il'LI ~~1111~1' '~ Ie . ~ I ; 7.~ :.; ~ ~ ~1~1,,, _ , ' ~~ I v! a0 !~ I, z ~~' I~' l 11 I~ ~ ~ ~, ~o II y w nvN3NIllIW ~ , 1, 4ik+{ ,0I n i `ry Y 1 I ~~ I I ~ ;I I `''~ 'I}.~ I ~~~ 1^° I I I .z, I z' ~'~ I I w~ ~ I - I I ;, z :', ~ O_ W N ! v ~ _I~~7b ~ ~ n n ~~ I ~ ~ m 1 ~ ~ I i~ Q Q I I(w ~ I , , ~ r 1, ~ + ~ z ~ 11 I i{11: ~ z 1 ~ , ~' ~ ~ ~ 'p r, G ~,, ~ . _ I' t Q ~~ l ylh~ i:v r~Ev\J~ , .1.?.~ ! ' ' I_ I'r.ll ~ ~_ % ~r` i I V ~~ e t ~' ~,~~~ \~~ IF 1114~~~~ ~ ,\ ~I 1 ~,~. 11 it C+~ I Q ~ ~ ~~ l ~ ~ '.z1 ~ .I wzl ~~~ ~AI~t1' m' ` t~~ ,'rte 1 ;, ~' OZ IIII II. ~ ~ ~\ DOY "~~, ~ ~' 11~• r ~~,, ~ C~~`r y°n~>~ ~ ~ 111, ~ e~i;I II r iC .. ~z `~ ('~j'I'.il ,~II1 a ~~m~ z (IIII ~ ~~ ~, oa 1 1 ~ y' ~ I-` r~ u I I I ~, I. P ~y' J r~ll,l 11 ~~ A4~, ,. ~ V AA I 11~ ~ 1111 ,~.y.,~~:W ~~~ ~ N .;~I~` N 'll ~(~ Ili" I ill z~t$' ~ F~ z I . ~1~ I ~, i I ~ 1~ ~ o I "' i r(1.~ I I.~_, 11;~ g 1 1 I ~ 1,01 r ~ ,, ' 1 : ' I l ~ 11 ~ ~, ~ ~ r .' t '~: es I ~' I I ' z z~ ~ 1 I' J 1I ~~' pe=m Y Eu YE ' 11 ~ I~ ' ~J ~~~ ~ ~ ~i 7 it J I'f f 1. ~ ' m '-O~ES~ a°~`Ea°~x `s° ~ O' I ' I '.1, 11 Jlr e ( 1 I% f _l- l• z ~~m@~69s~zeoo~=e`o 4 ~ ,, I I I i bj tf E¢ (< ., B`e8 I II ~ z '~ ~I~ ~ I f ~, f ~_ yy =~E gE ~$9a ~ , II I ~ -~Ir,r, O 1.1. ~~ 1v~ f~F ~ ,. ~ E = Q~`E~~• e I II 1 ~ ~ ~ 'I 1 n~ '_/z- ~ ae ~v moo I ~ ~~I,r-l~~ I I 11 J ~. ~ r _~ r; ' 1 r'~~1' ~ vso„n=e~`°~°€o°rs° I I~ ~~ , ~ I I ,~"~4 I s Esc°~ €>1 ~ III III 1 ~f qr ~f ,~~ ~Cf hb ~, w~ ~ 'e€ e I 1 Ill i1 11 1 ;/ t/~' ~ a~.Y¢ o8Y N ~ _ III 1 h I 1 1 ~ ~ nr II ~ a,~rf b~ r'Fr ~~~ ~ g8g p<< _8n@~PS qqQ g~ I I ,I~ ~ I ( I II.'ill I ~I- ~ N!'. /N t-' lv//.tr lO I 't~my@iu mV~ Z Seim I I ~I~ ~I ~ ~ 0~~~'f fi Imo)`( ~L~dr~..lryl~'I I' ~. I Es:~€g=~~~ ss e:xt I s I I 1. 111111 ~."llil'I~111~11~1)~ ~tl~~l'r,~~nvN3nvH ~' li I (1"v' ;'ll ~~ ~ I 1 1 111 I I ~!~ I ~ ~~ ~ I ~~I ~~ I ~ ~ 11 ~ ~1 I .I ,nill ~ ~ ~ 1 ESTIMATE OF COSTS The estimated costs of administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing the improvements as described in the Plans and Specifications are summarized below. Each year, as part of the assessment district levy calculation process, the costs and expenses are reviewed and the annual costs are projected for the following fiscal year. District Budget Estimated 2011N2 Bud et Personnel Services Regular Payroll $595,920.00 Overtime Salaries 1,050.00 Part-time Salaries 32,280.00 Frinqe Benefits 282.680.00 Subtotal Personnel $911,930.00 Operations and Maintenance Operations and Maintenance $67,150.00 Vehicle Operations and Maintenance 6,000.00 Equip Operations & Maint 3,750.00 Depreciation -Computer Equip 150.00 Contract Services 367,690.00 Contract Services/Facilities 0.00 Tree Maintenance 10,180.00 Utilities Telephone Utilities 2,560.00 Water Utilities 249,730.00 Electric Utilities 33,960.00 Assessment Administration 23,010.00 General Overhead 177.110.00 Subtotal Operations and Maintenance $941,290.00 Capital Expenditures Capital Outlay -Vehicles 10,780.00 Capital Protects 5555.000.00 Subtotal Capital Expenditures $565,780.00 Total District Expenditure Budget - $2,419,000.00 Total Estimated Assessment $2,498,140.00 Less Anticipated Delinquencies (119.271.001 Total Estimated Revenues $2,378,870.00 Plus Operating Reserve Fund Contribution 40,130.00 Total Expenditure Budget $2,419,000.00 Total Estimated Assessment $2,498,140.00 Total District EBU Count 6,574.05 Actual Assessment per EBU -Fiscal Year 2011 /12 $380.00 Maximum Allowable Assessment er EBU -Fiscal Year 2011 /12 $380.00 Landscape Maintenance District No. 4-R -City of Rancho Cucamonga 12 Fiscal Year 2011/12 The maximum allowable assessment per EBU listed in the District budget above, is the amount which was approved in 1996/97 and subsequent District annexations. Each year, prior to the assessments being placed on the tax roll, the City will review the budget and determine the amount needed to maintain the improvements for the upcoming fiscal year. The actual assessment per EBU will be based on the estimated costs of maintenance, available fund balance and maximum allowable assessment with the goal of maintaining the improvements in a satisfactory and healthy condition. The actual assessment amount may be lower than the maximum allowable assessment; however it may not exceed the maximum unless the increase is approved by the property owners in accordance with Proposition 218. It is the intent of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to maintain an Operating Reserve which shall not exceed the estimated costs of maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or when the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The reserve balance information for the District is as follows: Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2011 Reserve Fund Balance $2,009,670.00 Operating Reserve Contribution -Fiscal Year 2011/12 40,130.00 Ooeratina Reserve Collection -Fiscal Year 2011/12 0.00 Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2012 Reserve Fund Balance $1,954,540.00 Definitions of Budget Items The following definitions describe the costs and expenses included in the District Budget: Personnel Services Reoular Salaries: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all full-time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Part Time Salaries: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all part time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Fringe Benefits: This item includes the benefits available to City employees: health care, vacation, sick time, and retirement fund. Operations and Maintenance Contract Services: This item includes the contract costs of a landscape maintenance company responsible for the ongoing maintenance of the District improvements. Tree Maintenance: This item includes the contract costs attributed to maintaining the street trees and other trees throughout the District. Utilities -Water: This item includes the costs to furnish water for the landscaping within the District. Utilities -Electric: This item includes the costs to furnish electricity required for the operation and maintenance of the sprinklers and irrigation controllers. Assessment Administration: This item includes the cost to all particular departments and staff of the City, and consultants for providing the administration, coordination and management of District services, operations, and incidental expenses related to the District. This item also includes creation of an annual engineer's report, resolutions and placing the assessment amounts onto the County tax Landscape Maintenance District No. 4-R -City of Rancho Cucamonga 13 Fiscal Year 2011/12 roll each year, along with responding to any public inquiries and future Proposition 218 balloting proceedings. General Overhead: This item includes the costs of all departments and staff of the City for providing the coordination of District services, inspections, annual bid management, responding to public concerns, public education, accounting, auditing and procedural matters associated with the District. This item also includes an allocation for general City staff time for administrative functions and systems that provide for a functional and operational assessment district within the City's administrative structure. Capital Expenditures: Capital Projects: This item includes new improvements to further enhance the level and quality of service provided within the boundaries of the District. This may include new monuments, irrigation systems, and other large improvements. Operating Reserve Collection: Operatino Reserve Collection: This item includes the amount to be collected to maintain reserves to enable the City to pay for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or whenever the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The Reserve Fund contribution will continue until such a time the Reserve Fund balance is approximately one half of the annual costs. The fund may be allowed to accumulate in anticipation of any unforeseen expenses not included in the yearly maintenance costs. This may include, but is not limited to, tree replacements, repair of damaged equipment due to vandalism, storms and other similar events. Landscape Maintenance District No. 4-R -City of Rancho Cucamonga 14 Fiscal Year 2011/12 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT General Pursuant to the 1972 Act and Article XIII D, all parcels that have a special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements and services shall be identified, and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel shall be determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of improvements. The 1972 Act, permits the establishment of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include the operation, maintenance and servicing of landscaping improvements. Section 22573 of the 1972 Act requires that maintenance assessments must be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. This Section states: "The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district maybe apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements." The determination of whether or not a lot or parcel will benetlt from the improvements shall be made pursuant to the Improvement Act of 1911 (Division 7 (commencing with Section 5000) (of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California)." The 1972 Act also permits the designation of zones of benefit within any individual assessment district if "by reasons or variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive different degrees of benefit from the improvement" (Sec. 22547). Article XIII D, Section 4(a) of the California Constitution limits the amount of any assessment to the proportional special benefit conferred on the property. Article XIII D also provides that publicly owned properties must be assessed unless there is clear and convincing evidence that those properties receive no special benefit from the assessment. Exempted from the assessment would be the areas of public streets, public avenues, public lanes, public roads, public drives, public courts, public alleys, public easements and rights-of-ways, public greenbelts and public parkways. The net amount to be assessed may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels. Proposition 218, approved by the voters in November 1996, requires the City to separate general benefit from special benefit, where only special benefit is assessed. Benefit The maintenance and servicing of the improvements within the District (which are described in the Description of Improvements and Services Section of this report) are for the benefit of the properties within the District, and as such confer a special and direct benefit to parcels within the District by: • improving the livability, appearance, and desirability for properties within the boundaries of the District, and • ensuring that improvements do not reach a state of deterioration or disrepair so as to be materially detrimental to properties within the District, and Landscape Maintenance District No. 4-R -City of Rancho Cucamonga 15 Fiscal Year 2011/12 • providing beautification, shade and overall enhancement to properties within the District. The above mentioned items affect the assessed property in a way that is particular and distinct from their effect on other parcels and that real property in general and the public at large do not share. They contribute to a specific enhancement of the properties within the District. Since these improvements, including the community trails, were installed and are maintained specifically for the properties within the District; only properties within the District receive a special benefit and are assessed for said maintenance. General Benefit In addition to the special benefits received by parcels within the District, there are derivative general benefits that are conferred on parcels outside the boundaries of the District which include: • the control of dust and insect infestations, and • the visual enhancement of the area to persons or vehicles that may travel through the District. However it has been determined that these benefits are derivative and do not provide a direct benefit to parcels outside of the district that are not being assessed. Method of Assessment Each of the parcels within the District is deemed to receive special benefit from the improvements. Each parcel that has a special benefit conferred upon it as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements are identified and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel is determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of the improvements. , When the District was formed in 1984, Article XIII D and Proposition 218 had not yet been passed. Upon the passage of Article XIII D and the subsequent passage of the Proposition Omnibus Implementation Act, new rules were put into place. Due to the changes in legal requirements, as property annexed to the District after the passage of the Assessment Law, the description of the method of assessment became more refined, however, the assessment per parcel has remained the same since the 1996/97 Fiscal Year. Further, no parcel included in the District formation or annexations prior to when the language was refined, are now being levied differently than they were at the time the District was formed or the parcels were annexed. To assess special benefit appropriately, it is necessary to relate the different type of parcel improvements to each other. The Equivalent Benefit Unit ("EBU") method of apportionment uses the single family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single family home equals one Equivalent Benefit Unit (EBU). Every other land-use is converted to EBUs based on an assessment formula that equates to the property's specific development status, type of development (land-use), and size of the property, as compared to a single family home. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land-use types, as assigned by County use code, to determine each parcel's EBU assignment. Landscape Maintenance District No. 4-R -City of Rancho Cucamonga 16 Fiscal Year 2011/12 Land-Use Equivalent Dwelling Units Pro ert T e Coun Use Code EBU Value Multi lier Single Family Residential 1.00 Dwelling Unit Condominium 0.80 Dwelling Unit Multi -Family 0.70 Dwelling Unit Commercial! Industrial 3.25 Acre Vacant (incl. all undeveloped property) 0.25 Acre Schools 0.25 Acre The use of the latest County Assessor's Secured Roll shall be the basis for the Property Type determination and units/acreage assignments, unless better data is available to the City. In addition, if any parcel within the District is identified by the County Auditor/Controller to be an invalid parcel number for the current fiscal year, the Property Type and EBU assignment shall be based on the correct parcel number andlor new parcel number(s) County use code and subsequent property information. If a single parcel has changed to multiple parcels, the EBU assignment and assessment amount applied to each of the new parcels will be recalculated rather than spread the proportionate share of the original assessment. The following table summarizes the Fiscal Year 2011/12 maximum allowable assessment rates for the District: Property Type (County Use Code) Maximum Allowable Assessment Rate er EBU Actual Assessment Rate per EBU Total Units/Acres Total EBUs Single Family Residential $380.00 $380.00 2,652.00 2,652.00 Condominium $380.00 $380.00 1,395.00 1,116.00 Multi-family $380.00 $380.00 3,139.00 2,197.30 Commercial/Industrial $380.00 $360.00 176.28 572.91 Vacant $380.00 $380.00 107.96 26.99 Schools $380.00 $380.00 35.41 8.85 The total amount of maintenance and incidental costs for maintaining the landscaping and community trail improvements is assessed to the individual parcels of real property within the District in proportion to the special benefit received by such parcels of real property. The proposed individual assessments are shown on the assessment roll in this report. Landscape Maintenance District No. 4-R -City of Rancho Cucamonga 17 Fiscal Year 2011/12 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM An Assessment Diagram for the District is shown on the following page. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the County Assessor of the County San Bernardino, at the time this report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Engineer's Report. Landscape Maintenance District No. 4-R -City of Rancho Cucamonga 18 Fiscal Year 2011/12 ,`~ V •~~ Q ' ,~ C N 1 w i _ . ~ ,, ~ i my epuen~R3 G1 i Q 'i t0 y ~8 ~aa~~. ed.._.._ = ny, ~a;sayooa J ;.. ny ua~illiW ~_.._.._.._,.- ~, ny uaneH ny esow~aH nV PIeQ!4o~V ny uewllaH ;g uegawe~ -nylway~ y ~ ~ y~~ 1i C ~. J m N ~ = 0 3 l 0 m Ro ii Q 'N N ® ~ O ;sea co • •, ~_.._..1.._.. .._..r• ~ ~ ~ ~' ~ m d ' ~ c N m ZO V ' ny ~a;sayooa ny ua~gl!W ny uane~-{ ny esow~aH nV PIe9!yo~V ~ ~ ~ ~ ny uewllaH . •'~~ L ~ ny p e~(auln sspp~e_z'~~:g'g~ ¢ g; €E@€g ny anal ~ ~ ~~ _ yy p i Q ~~~€..g %ge : € ; ~~ ~ ~ l ~ ~ y F s ` • - - °:A~:I€~ a :~ SS'5 E~Epit~e, Eu Y$ g y 1 PEPSt yy F ~'eE T~' i~ $p a r l esE Sap~~ ~X~:~`s~e°:~~E N 1= ~ J Q ~ > L U ~ ASSESSMENT ROLL Assessment Roll The assessment roll is a listing of the assessment for Fiscal Year 2011/12 apportioned to each lot or parcel, as shown on the last equalized roll of the Assessor of the County of San Bernardino. The following tables summarize the Fiscal Year 2011/12 maximum and actual assessments for the District: Property Type Coun Use Code Maximum Allowable Assessment Rate er EBU Total Units/Acres Total EBUs Maximum Allowable Assessment Single Family Residential $360.00 2,652.00 2,652.00 $1,007,760.00 Condominium $380.00 1,395.00 1,116.00 $424,080.00 Multi-family $380.00 3,139.00 2,197.30 $834,974.00 Commercial/Industrial $360.00 176.28 572.91 $217,705.80 Vacant $380.00 107.96 26.99 $10,256.20 Schools $360.00 35.41 8.85 $3,363.95 Property Type Coun Use Code Actual Assessment Rate er EBU Total Units/Acres Total EBUs Actual Assessment Single Family Residential $380.00 2,652.00 2,652.00 $1,007,760.00 Condominium $380.00 1,395.00 1,116.00 $424,080.00 Multi-family $380.00 3,139.00 2,197.30 $834,974.00 Commercial/Industrial $380.00 176.28 572.91 $217,705.80 Vacant $380.00 107.96 26.99 $10,256.20 Schools $380.00 35.41 8.85 $3,363.95 A copy of the full assessment roll is available for review in the City Clerk's office. Annexations There were no annexations effective for the 2011/12 Fiscal Year: Landscape Maintenance District No. 4-R -City of Rancho Cucamonga 19 Fiscal Year 2011/12 Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2011/2012 City of Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 (Tot Lot) CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 5 (TOT LOT) 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Phone: 909.477.2740 Fax: 909.477.2741 CITY COUNCIL L. Dennis Michael, Mayor Sam Spagnolo, Mayor Pro Tem William Alexander, Council Member Chuck Buquet, Council Member Diane Williams, Council Member CITY STAFF John R. Gillison, Assistant City Manager Linda D. Daniels, Deputy City Manager William Wittkopf, Public Works Director Ingrid Y. Bruce, GIS/Special Districts Manager Christopher Bopko, Management Analyst III TABLE OF CONTENTS ENGINEER'S LETTER INTRODUCTION 1 3 Reason for Assessment .............................................................................................3 Process for Annual Assessment .................................................................................3 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS ~ 5 Description of the Boundaries of the District ...............................................................5 Description of Improvements and Services ................................................................5 Map of Improvements .................................................................................................5 ESTIMATE OF COSTS 6 District Budget ............................................................................................................6 Definitions of Budget Items .........................................................................................7 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT 9 General .......................................................................................................................9 Special Benefit ...........................................................................................................9 General Benefit ........................................................................................................10 Method of Assessment Spread ................................................................................10 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM ASSESSMENT ROLL 12 13 Assessment Roll .......................................................................................................13 Annexations ..............................................................................................................13 ENGINEER'S LETTER WHEREAS, on July 6, 2011, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga (the "City"), under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 (the "1972 Act") adopted its Resolution No. 11-098, a Resolution Initiating Proceedings for the Levy of Annual Assessments for Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 (Tot Lot) (the "District"); and WHEREAS, the Resolution Initiating Proceedings directed staff to prepare and file an Engineer's Report for Fiscal Year 2011/12 pursuant to the requirements of the 1972 Act. The Engineer's Report presents the plans and specifications describing the general nature, location and extent of the improvements to be maintained, an estimate of the costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements for the District for the referenced fiscal year, a diagram for the District, showing the area and properties proposed to be assessed, and an assessment of the estimated costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing the improvements, assessing the net amount upon all assessable lots and/or parcels within the District in proportion to the special benefit received; and NOW THEREFORE, the following assessment is proposed to be authorized in order to pay the estimated costs of maintenance, operation and servicing of the improvements to be paid by the assessable real property within the boundaries of the District in proportion to the special benefit received. The following table summarizes the proposed assessment. SUMMARY OF ASSESSMENT Fiscal Year 2077/12 Total Estimated Assessment $4,980.00 Plus Anticipated Delinquency Penalty 1 070.00 Total Estimated Revenue $8,050.00 Less Reserve Fund Contribution 0.00 Total Expenditure Budget $6050.00 Total District EBU Count 44.00 Actual Assessment per EBU $113.29 Maximum Allowable Assessment per EBU $113.29 In making the assessments contained herein pursuant to the 1972 Act: I have identified all parcels which will have a special benefit conferred upon them from the improvements described in the Special Benefit Section of this Engineer's Report (the "Specially Benefited Parcels"). For particulars as to the identification of said parcels, reference is made to the Assessment Diagram, a copy of which is included in this Engineer's Report. 2. I have evaluated the costs and expenses of the improvements upon the Specially Benefited Parcels. In making such evaluation: Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2011 /12 a. The proportionate special benefit derived by each Specially Benefited Parcel from the improvements was determined in relationship to the entirety of the maintenance costs of the improvements; b. No assessment has been imposed on any Specially Benefited Parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on such parcel from the improvements; and c. Any general benefits from the improvements have been separated from the special benefits and only special benefits have been assessed. I, the undersigned, respectfully submit the enclosed Engineer's Report and, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, the Engineer's Report, Assessments, and the Assessment Diagram herein have been prepared and computed in accordance with the order of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Assessment Law. Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2011112 INTRODUCTION Reason for Assessment Approval of the assessment covered by this Engineer's Report will generate the revenue necessary to: Provide for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements described in this Engineer's Report. Maintenance may include but is not limited to, all of the following: the repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement, providing for the life, growth, health and beauty of the landscaping, including cultivation, irrigation, trimming, spraying, fertilizing or treating for disease or injury, the removal of trimming, rubbish, debris and other solid waste, the maintenance, repair and replacement as necessary of all irrigation systems and the removal of graffiti from walls immediately adjacent to the cultivated areas. Servicing means the furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operating and servicing of any improvement. Servicing shall also include vehicle, equipment, capital improvements and administrative costs associated with the annual administration and operation of the District. Process for Annual Assessment The City cannot levy and collect annual assessments within the District without complying with the procedures specified in the 1972 Act. On an annual basis, an Engineer's Report must be prepared which contains a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the district. The City Council must also adopt a resolution of intention which: • Declares the intention of the City Council to levy and collect assessments within the assessment district for the fiscal year stated therein. • Generally describes the existing and proposed improvements and any substantial changes proposed to be made in existing improvements. • Refers to the assessment district by its distinctive designation and indicate the general location of the district. • Refers to the report of the engineer, on file with the clerk, for a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the district. • Gives notice of the time and place for public hearing by the City Council on the levy of the proposed assessment. • States whether the assessment is proposed to increase from the previous year. If the assessments are to be levied in the same or lesser amounts than the maximum assessment amount approved, the clerk shall give notice by causing the resolution of intention to be published. Any interested person may, prior to the conclusion of the public hearing, file a written protest which shall state all grounds of objection. The protest shall contain a description sufficient to identify the property owned by the property owner filing the protest. During the course or upon conclusion of the hearing, the City Council may order changes in any of the matters provided in the report, including changes in the improvements, any zones within the assessment district, and the proposed diagram or the proposed assessment. The City Council, upon conclusion of the public hearing must then adopt a resolution confirming the diagram and assessment, either as originally proposed or as changed by it. The adoption of the resolution shall constitute the levv of an assessment for the fiscal vear referred to in the assessment. Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2011/12 If the assessment to be levied exceeds the maximum assessment amount previously approved, the City must comply with the procedures specified in Article XI II D and Proposition 21 S. The voters in the State of California in November 1996 added Article XIII D to the California Constitution imposing, among other requirements, the necessity for the City to conduct an assessment ballot procedure to enable the owners of each property on which assessments are proposed to be enacted or increased, the opportunity to express their support for, or opposition to the proposed assessment or increase in such assessment. The basic steps of the assessment ballot procedure are outlined below. The City must prepare a Notice of Public Hearing ("Notice"), which describes, along with other mandated information, the reason for the proposed assessments, and to provide a date and time of a public hearing to be held on the matter. The City must also prepare an assessment ballot, which clearly gives the property owner the ability to sign and mark their assessment ballot either in favor of, or in opposition tc the proposed assessment. The Notice and assessment ballot are mailed tc each affected property owner within the District a minimum of 45 days prior to the public hearing date as shown in the Notice. The City may also hold community meetings with the property owners to discuss the issues facing the District and to answer property owner questions directly. After the Notice and assessment ballot are mailed, property owners are given until the close of the public hearing, stated in the Notice, to return their signed and marked assessment ballot. During the public hearing, property owners are given the opportunity to address the City Council and ask questions or voice their concerns. At the public hearing, the returned assessment ballots received prior to the close of the public hearing are tabulated, weighted by the proposed assessment amount on each property and the results are announced by the City Council. Article XIII D provides that if, as a result of the assessment ballot proceeding, a majority protest is found to exist, the City Council shall not have the authority to levy and collect the assessments as proposed. A majority protest exists if the assessments represented by ballots submitted in opposition exceed those submitted in favor of the assessment. All returned ballots are tabulated and weighted according to the financial obligation of each particular parcel. If there is no majority protest as described above, the City Council may approve the proposed assessments. If there is a majority protest, as described above, the City will not levy and collect any assessments. Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2011/12 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS The District provides for the administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing of various improvements located within the public right-of-way and dedicated easements within the boundaries of the District. Description of the Boundaries of the District The District is located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California. The boundaries of the District are generally described as that area of the City bounded by Hermosa Avenue on the west, 26th Avenue on the south, the parcels north of and along Bedford Drive and the parcels west of and along Andover Place. Reference is also made to the Assessment Diagram included in this Report. Description of Improvements and Services The improvements are the maintenance and servicing of landscaping sites and appurtenant facilities throughout the District. The landscaping maintenance includes, but is not limited to, shrubs, turt, tree trimming, weed and pest control, landscape irrigation systems and testing, trash, debris and graffiti removal, and associated appurtenant facilities. Services include personnel, materials, contracting services, utilities, and all necessary casts associated with the maintenance, replacement and repair required to keep the improvements in a healthy, vigorous and satisfactory condition. In addition, it is the City's intention to continue to use cost effective materials, including the future ability to replace landscaping with drought resistant or low water use plants, in order to lower expenses of the District. The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows: Parks: Tot Lot. Site # Descriptive Location I-1-5 The tat lot on the southwest corner of Andover and Bedford. Ground Cover area: 1,506 square feet Turf area: 1,070 square feet Parks are maintained by the City's Park Maintenance Crews Map of Improvements The following page shows the map of landscaping improvements, including irrigation sites and community trails, to be maintained using District funds. Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2011/12 i ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ _ ~ ~ -- zQ _ __ _ _ ~ - -~ ~- ~ i 1 ~ I_ . - --1------ -- -- -- _ _ ~ a ~ z ~ w a ~ W w w O O ~ ~ ~ _~ F ~ Q ~ W ~_ ~ _~ Y ~ O W U ~ O ~ W ~ Q ~ W ~ Q ~ Q ~ Q _ _. _-~ ~ I 0 0 ~ 11~ I I ;_ - -- ---- - i 1 - ~ ~ -I I i ~ -- - - J - - --- .~ z ~ __ o~ - __ _ o \_i~ T ~ I ~ I --- -- O i I I 0 - o- - - - - _.-i_ __._l-_ -L_._. ~ I _ _- ~ -_- - - M `Ir h 1 __ __ C ~ .__ ___' ~ - r _ - ___ _-__. ~ O , - - ~ - -- -- ---0- -- 0 I _ C ---1- - ----- -__ - - - -~ - Q t ~ ° y a ' ~-~ - - f - ) - -- - -- r--- - u r ~ ~ ~ i ~-~ _ ~ r - - o- ~ - - ~ l _ -- -~- ',I ~ I ~ i i_ l _ 1 _ - - - - - - 1 - 1--- ~ ~ ~ -~- -1 ~~ ~ i ~ ~i I 1 ---- - -; -- ~ ESTIMATE OF COSTS The estimated costs of administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing the improvements as described in the Plans and Specifications are summarized below. Each year, as part of the assessment district levy calculation process, the costs and expenses are reviewed and the annual costs are projected for the following fiscal year. District Budget Estimated 2011/12 Bud et Personnel Services Regular Payroll $0.00 Part-time Salaries 0.00 Fringe Benefits 0.00 Subtotal Personnel $0.00 Operations and Maintenance Operations and Maintenance $800.00 Vehicle Operations and Maintenance 70.00 Contract Services ' 1,690.00 Contract Services/Facilities 0.00 Tree Maintenance 0.00 Utilities Water Utilities 420.00 Electric Utilities 480.00 Assessment Administration 240.00 General Overhead 360.00 Subtotal Operations and Maintenance $4,060.00 Capital Expenditures Capital Projects 0.00 Subtotal Capital Expenditures $0.00 Total Expenditure Budget $4,060.00 Total Estimated Assessment $4,980.00 Plus Anticipated Delinquency Penalty 1.070.00 Total Estimated Revenue $6,050.00 Less Operating Reserve Fund Collection 0.00 Total Expenditure Budget $6,050.00 Total Estimated Assessment $4,980.00 Total District EBU Count 44.00 Actual Assessment per EBU -Fiscal Year 2011/12 $113.29 Maximum Allowable Assessment er EBU -Fiscal Year 2011/12 $113.29 The maximum allowable assessment per EBU listed in the District budget above, is the amount which was approved in 1996/97 and subsequent District annexations. Each year, prior to the assessments being placed on the tax roll, the City will review the budget and determine the amount needed to maintain the improvements for the upcoming fiscal year. The actual assessment per EBU will be Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2011112 based on the estimated costs of maintenance, available fund balance and maximum allowable assessment with the goal of maintaining the improvements in a satisfactory and healthy condition. The actual assessment amount may be lower than the maximum allowable assessment; however it may not exceed the maximum unless the increase is approved by the property owners in accordance with Proposition 218. It is the intent of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to maintain an Operating Reserve which shall not exceed the estimated costs of maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or when the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The reserve balance information for the District is as follows: Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2011 Reserve Fund Balance $75,500.00 Operating Reserve Contribution -Fiscal Year 2011/12 0.00 Ooerating Reserve Collection -Fiscal Year 2011/12 1.070.00 Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2012 Reserve Fund Balance $76,570.00 Definitions of Budget Items The following definitions describe the costs and expenses included in the District Budget Personnel Services Regular Salaries: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all full-time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Part Time Salaries: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all part time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Fringe Benefits: This item includes the benefits available to City employees: health care, vacation, sick time, and retirement fund. Operations and Maintenance Contract Services: This item includes the contract costs of a landscape maintenance company responsible for the ongoing maintenance of the District improvements. Tree Maintenance: This item includes the contract costs attributed to maintaining the street trees and other trees throughout the District. Utilities -Water: This item includes the costs to furnish water for the landscaping within the District. Utilities -Electric: This item includes the costs to furnish electricity required for the operation and maintenance of the sprinklers and irrigation controllers. Assessment Administration: This item includes the cost to all particular departments and staff of the City, and consultants for providing the administration, coordination and management of District services, operations, and incidental expenses related to the District. This item also includes creation of an annual engineer's report, resolutions and placing the assessment amounts onto the County tax roll each year, along with responding to any public inquiries and future Proposition 218 balloting proceedings. General Overhead: This item includes the costs of all departments and staff of the City for providing the coordination of District services, inspections, annual bid management, responding to public Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 7 Fiscal Year 2011/12 concerns, public education, accounting, auditing and procedural matters associated with the District This item also includes an allocation for general City staff time for administrative functions and systems that provide for a functional and operational assessment district within the City's administrative structure. Capital Expenditures: Capital Projects: This item includes new improvements to further enhance the level and quality of service provided within the boundaries of the District. This may include new monuments, irrigation systems, and other large improvements. Operating Reserve Collection: Operating Reserve Collection: This item includes the amount to be collected to maintain reserves to enable the City to pay for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or whenever the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The'Reserve Fund contribution will continue until such a time the Reserve Fund balance is approximately one half of the annual costs. The fund may be allowed to accumulate in anticipation of any unforeseen expenses not included in the yearly maintenance costs. This may include, but is not limited to, tree replacements, repair of damaged equipment due to vandalism, storms and other similar events. Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2011/12 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT General Pursuant to the 1972 Act and Article XIII D, all parcels that have a special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements and services shall be identified, and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel shall be determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of improvements. The 1972 Act, permits the establishment of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include the operation, maintenance and servicing of landscaping improvements. Section 22573 of the 1972 Act requires that maintenance assessments must be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. This Section states: "The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district maybe apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or pamels in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements." The determination o/ whether or not a lot or parcel will benefit from the improvements shall be made pursuant to the Improvement Act of 1911 (Division 7 (commencing with Section 5000) (of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California]." The 1972 Act also permits the designation of zones of benefit within any individual assessment district if "by reasons or variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive different degrees of benefit from the improvement" (Sec. 22547). Article XIII D, Section 4(a) of the California Constitution limits the amount of any assessment to the proportional special benefit conferred on the property. Article XIII D also provides that publicly owned properties must be assessed unless there is clear and convincing evidence that those properties receive no special benefit from the assessment. Exempted from the assessment would be the areas of public streets, public avenues, public lanes, public roads, public drives, public courts, public alleys, public easements and rights-of-ways, public greenbelts and public parkways. The net amount to be assessed may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels. Proposition 218, approved by the voters in November 1996, requires the City to separate general benefit from special benefit, where only special benefit is assessed. Benefit The maintenance and servicing of the improvements within the District (which are described in the Description of Improvements and Services Section of this report) are for the benefit of the properties within the District, and as such confer a special and direct benefit to parcels within the District by: • improving the livability, appearance, and desirability for properties within the boundaries of the District, and • ensuring that improvements do not reach a state of deterioration or disrepair so as to be materially detrimental to properties within the District, and Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2011 /12 • providing beautification, shade and overall enhancement to properties within the District. The above mentioned items affect the assessed property in a way that is particular and distinct from their effect on other parcels and that real property in general and the public at large do not share. They contribute to a specific enhancement of the properties within the District. Since these improvements, including the community trails, were installed and are maintained specifically for the properties within the District; only properties within the District receive a special benefit and are assessed for said maintenance. General Benefit In addition to the special benefits received by parcels within the District, there are derivative general benefits that are conferred on parcels outside the boundaries of the District which include: • the control of dust and insect infestations, and • the visual enhancement of the area to persons or vehicles that may travel through the District. However it has been determined that these benefits are derivative and do not provide a direct benefit to parcels outside of the district that are not being assessed. Method of Assessment Spread Each of the parcels within the District is deemed to receive special benefit from the improvements. Each parcel that has a special benefit conferred upon it as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements are identified and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel is determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of the improvements. When the District was formed in 1984, Article XIII D and Proposition 218 had not yet been passed. Upon the passage of Article XIII D and the subsequent passage of the Proposition Omnibus Implementation Act, new rules were put into place. Due to the changes in legal requirements, as property annexed to the District after the passage of the Assessment Law, the description of the method of assessment became more refined, however, the assessment per parcel has remained the same since the 1996/97 Fiscal Year. Further, no parcel included in the District formation or annexations prior to when the language was refined, are now being levied differently than they were at the time the District was formed or the parcels were annexed. To assess special benefit appropriately, it is necessary to relate the different type of parcel improvements to each other. The Equivalent Benefit Unit ("EBU") method of apportionment uses the single family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single family home equals one Equivalent Benefit Unit (EBU). Every other land-use is converted to EBUs based on an assessment formula that equates to the property's specific development status, type of development (land-use), and size of the property, as compared to a single family home. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land-use types, as assigned by County use code, to determine each parcel's EBU assignment. Land-Use E uivalent Dwellin Units Pro ert T e Count Use Code EBU Value Multi tier Single Family Residential 1.00 Dwelling Unit Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 10 Fiscal Year 2011112 The use of the latest County Assessor's Secured Roll shall be the basis for the Property Type determination and unitslacreage assignments, unless better data is available to the City. In addition, if any parcel within the District is identified by the County Auditor/Controller to be an invalid parcel number for the current fiscal year, the Property Type and EBU assignment shall be based on the correct parcel number and/or new parcel number(s) County use code and subsequent property information. If a single parcel has changed to multiple parcels, the EBU assignment and assessment amount applied to each of the new parcels will be recalculated rather than spread the proportionate share of the original assessment. The following table summarizes the Fiscal Year 2011/12 maximum allowable assessment rates for the District: Maximum Allowable Property Type Assessment Rate Actual Assessment Total Total (County Use Code) er EBU Rate per EBU Units/Acres EBUs Single Family Residential $113.29 $113.29 44 44 The total amount of maintenance and incidental costs for maintaining the landscaping and community trail improvements is assessed to the individual parcels of real property within the District in proportion to the special benefit received by such parcels of real property. The proposed individual assessments are shown on the assessment roll in this report. Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 11 Fiscal Year 2011112 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM An Assessment Diagram for the District is shown on the following page. The Tines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the County Assessor of the County San Bernardino, at the time this report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Engineer's Report. Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 12 Fiscal Year 2011/12 ~+ yr` V •' •1.r .y A~ W ~_ •= 5~ L Q V a C J c N ._.. - ny I(JJay~ v 0: d C _ J fJ1 ~ N L ~ 3 l0 p O m ` lL Q N N N O 0 oN N O ny ua~lll!W ny uaneH ny esowJaH nH PIeQ!4oJH ny uewllaH 3S uepawe~ ny epuenn93 B ~aaJ~ lea ny Jalsayooa ..~.._ ~ 41 ~_ C N m o~ v U x N E J Q ~ U ~ ^'..4 J ti.r \ J nt/ lse3 in r v ..i_.._.._ . = ny epuenn!33 ny Jalsayooa ny ua~!II!W - _-. i ny uaneH ^ ! i ny esowJaH j ntl Pley!yoJV i - - ~..~' ~ ny uewllaH /t•• L i ny pJe~(au!n .• K ~.._."Y. _..___ .._.._ nfl~B~ E Esp ~ c_ ny anOJ~ m Q: cA ~ 3 a °~~~ 9 a.~B ~p ~ L J ~ N - 3 L L O OD a yy g ~E ppfd Ey aT neg~yFd~aa~ . F p ~ f0 m li Q f a eY9 S & ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ° Ya Y 6~ pE ~ ~ ~.~°i°~ g BE g~ Y9Pr~~3En~ i a9• a~~ a a a ~g e~9 g E iad d di54d ~sE ~e a ASSESSMENT ROLL Assessment Roll The assessment roll is a listing of the assessment for Fiscal Year 2011/12 apportioned to each lot or parcel, as shown on the last equalized roll of the Assessor of the County of San Bernardino. The following tables summarize the Fiscal Year 2011/12 maximum and actual assessments for the District: Maximum Allowable Maximum Property Type Assessment Rate Total Total Allowable Coun Use Code er EBU Units/Acres EBUs Assessment Single Family Residential $113.29 44 44 $4,984.76 Actual Property Type Assessment Rate Total Total Actual Coun Use Code er EBU Units/Acres EBUs Assessment Single Family Residential $113.29 44 44 $4,984.76 A copy of the full assessment roll is available for review in the City Clerk's office. Annexations There were no annexations effective for the 2011/12 Fiscal Year: Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 13 Fiscal Year 2011/12 Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2011/2012 City of Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 (North Etiwanda) CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 7 (NORTH ETIWANDA) 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Phone: 909.477.2740 Fax: 909.477.2741 CITY COUNCIL L. Dennis Michael, Mayor Sam Spagnolo, Mayor Pro Tem William Alexander, Council Member Chuck Buquet, Council Member Diane Williams, Council Member CITY STAFF John R. Gillison, Assistant City Manager Linda D. Daniels, Deputy City Manager William Wittkopf, Public Works Director Ingrid Y. Bruce, GIS/Special Districts Manager Christopher Bopko, Management Analyst III TABLE OF CONTENTS ENGINEER'S LETTER INTRODUCTION 3 Reason for Assessment .............................................................................................3 Process for Annual Assessment .................................................................................3 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS 5 Description of the Boundaries of the District .................................................:.............5 Description of Improvements and Services ................................................................5 Map of Improvements .................................................................................................9 ESTIMATE OF COSTS 10 District Budget ..........................................................................................................10 Definitions of Budget Items .......................................................................................11 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT 13 General ............................................................................. ........................................13 Special Benefit ................................................................. ........................................13 General Benefit ................................................................ ........................................14 Method of Assessment Spread ........................................ ........................................14 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM ASSESSMENT ROLL 16 17 Assessment Roll .......................................................................................................17 Annexations ..............................................................................................................17 ENGINEER'S LETTER WHEREAS, on July 6th, 2011, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 (the "1972 Act") adopted its Resolution No. 11-098, a Resolution Initiating Proceedings for the Levy of Annual Assessments for Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 (North Etiwanda) (the "District"); and WHEREAS, the Resolution Initiating Proceedings directed staff to prepare and file an Engineer's Report for Fiscal Year 2011/12 pursuant to the requirements of the 1972 Act. The Engineer's Report presents the plans and specifications describing the general nature, location and extent of the improvements to be maintained, an estimate of the costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements for the District for the referenced fiscal year, a diagram for the District, showing the area and properties proposed to be assessed, and an assessment of the estimated costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing the improvements, assessing the net amount upon all assessable lots and/or parcels within the District in proportion to the special benefit received; and NOW THEREFORE, the following assessment is proposed to be authorized in order to pay the estimated costs of maintenance, operation and servicing of the improvements to be paid by the assessable real property within the boundaries of the District in proportion to the special benefit received. The following table summarizes the proposed assessment. SUMMARY OF ASSESSMENT Fiscal Year 2011/12 Total Estimated Assessment $841,620.00 Less Anticipated Delinquencies 39 480.00 Total Estimated Revenue $802,140.00 Plus Reserve Fund Contribution 137 490.00 Total Expenditure Budget $939,630.00 Total District EBU Count 2,741.00 Actual Assessment per EBU $307.05 Maximum Allowable Assessment per EBU $307.05 In making the assessments contained herein pursuant to the 1972 Act: I have identified all parcels which will have a special benefit conferred upon them from the improvements described in the Special Benefit Section of this Engineer's Report (the "Specially Benefited Parcels"). For particulars as to the identification of said parcels, reference is made to the Assessment Diagram, a copy of which is included in this Engineer's Report. 2. I have evaluated the costs and expenses of the improvements upon the Specially Benefited Parcels. In making such evaluation: Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2011/12 a. The proportionate special benefit derived by each Specially Benefited Parcel from the improvements was determined in relationship to the entirety of the maintenance costs of the improvements; b. No assessment has been imposed on any Specially Benefited Parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on such parcel from the improvements; and c. Any general benefits from the improvements have been separated from the special benefits and only special benefits have been assessed. I, the undersigned, respectfully submit the enclosed Engineer's Report and, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, the Engineer's Report, Assessments, and the Assessment Diagram herein have been prepared and computed in accordance with the order of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Assessment Law. Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2011/12 INTRODUCTION Reason for Assessment Approval of the assessment covered by this Engineer's Report will generate the revenue necessary to: Provide for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements described in this Engineer's Report. Maintenance may include but is not limited to, all of the following: the repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement, providing for the life, growth, health and beauty of the landscaping, including cultivation, irrigation, trimming, spraying, fertilizing or treating for disease or injury, the removal of trimming, rubbish, debris and other solid waste, the maintenance, repair and replacement as necessary of all irrigation systems and the removal of graffiti from walls immediately adjacent to the cultivated areas. Servicing means the furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operating and servicing of any improvement. Servicing shall also include vehicle, equipment, capital improvements and administrative costs associated with the annual administration and operation of the District. Process for Annual Assessment The City cannot levy and collect annual assessments within the District without complying with the procedures specified in the 1972 Act. On an annual basis, an Engineer's Report must be prepared which contains a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the district. The City Council must also adopt a resolution of intention which: • Declares the intention of the City Council to levy and collect assessments within the assessment district for the fiscal year stated therein. • Generally describes the existing and proposed improvements and any substantial changes proposed to be made in existing improvements. • Refers to the assessment district by its distinctive designation and indicate the general location of the district. • Refers to the report of the engineer, on file with the clerk, for a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the district. • Gives notice of the time and place for public hearing by the City Council on the levy of the proposed assessment. • States whether the assessment is proposed to increase from the previous year. If the assessments are to be levied in the same or lesser amounts than the maximum assessment amount approved, the clerk shall give notice by causing the resolution of intention to be published. Any interested person may, prior to the conclusion of the public hearing, file a written protest which shall state all grounds of objection. The protest shall contain a description sufficient to identify the property owned by the property owner filing the protest. During the course or upon conclusion of the hearing, the City Council may order changes in any of the matters provided in the report, including changes in the improvements, any zones within the assessment district, and the proposed diagram or the proposed assessment. The City Council, upon conclusion of the public hearing must then adopt a resolution confirming the diagram and assessment, either as originally proposed or as changed by it. The adoption of the resolution shall constitute the levy of an assessment for the fiscal year referred to in the assessment. Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2011/12 If the assessment to be levied exceeds the maximum assessment amount previously approved, the City must comply with the procedures specified in Article XIIID and Proposition 218. The voters in the State of California in November 1996 added Article XIIID to the California Constitution imposing, among other requirements, the necessity for the City to conduct an assessment ballot procedure to enable the owners of each property on which assessments are proposed to be enacted or increased, the opportunity to express their support for, or opposition to the proposed assessment or increase in such assessment. The basic steps of the assessment ballot procedure are outlined below. The City must prepare a Notice of Public Hearing ("Notice'), which describes, along with other mandated information, the reason for the proposed assessments, and to provide a date and time of a public hearing to be held on the matter. The City must also prepare an assessment ballot, which clearly gives the property owner the ability to sign and mark their assessment ballot either in favor of, or in opposition to the proposed assessment. The Notice and assessment ballot are mailed to each affected property owner within the District a minimum of 45 days prior to the public hearing date as shown in the Notice. The City may also hold community meetings with the property owners to discuss the issues facing the District and to answer property owner questions directly. After the Notice and assessment ballot are mailed, property owners are given until the close of the public hearing, stated in the Notice, to return their signed and marked assessment ballot. During the public hearing, property owners are given the opportunity to address the City Council and ask questions or voice their concerns. At the public hearing, the returned assessment ballots received prior to the close of the public hearing are tabulated, weighted by the proposed assessment amount on each property and the results are announced by the City Council. Article XIIID provides that if, as a result of the assessment ballot proceeding, a majority protest is found to exist, the City Council shall not have the authority to levy and collect the assessments as proposed. A majority protest exists if the assessments represented by ballots submitted in opposition exceed those submitted in favor of the assessment. All returned ballots are tabulated and weighted according to the financial obligation of each particular parcel. If there is no majority protest as described above, the City Council may approve the proposed assessments. If there is a majority protest, as described above, the City will not levy and collect any assessments. Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2011/12 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS The District provides for the administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing of various improvements located within the public right-of-way and dedicated easements within the boundaries of the District. Description of the Boundaries of the District The District is located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California. The boundaries of the District are generally described as that area of the City known as North Etiwanda, which is generally bounded by the 210 Freeway on the south, I-15 on the west, and City limits on the north. Typically parcels have been annexed to the District as they have developed. Reference is also made to the Assessment Diagram included in this Report. Description of Improvements and Services The improvements are the maintenance and servicing of landscaping sites and appurtenant facilities throughout the District. The various landscaping sites that are maintained consist of parkways, median islands, street trees, paseos and community trails located within street right-of-ways and dedicated public easements which are within the boundaries of the District. The landscaping maintenance includes, but is not limited to, shrubs, turt, tree trimming in irrigated City parkways and paseos, weed and pest control, landscape irrigation systems and testing, trash, debris and graffiti removal, and associated appurtenant facilities. Services include personnel, materials, contracting services, utilities, and all necessary costs associated with the maintenance, replacement and repair required to keep the improvements in a healthy, vigorous and satisfactory condition. In addition, it is the City's intention to continue to use cost effective materials, including the future ability to replace landscaping with drought resistant or low water use plants, in order to lower expenses of the District. The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows: Parks: Etiwanda Creek Park. Site # Descriptive Location EN-1 The North side of Wilson from San Sevaine to Ridgeline: The Eastside of Ridgeline from Wilson to Arcadia, the south side of Arcadia from Ridgeline to 77 feet east of Ridgeline. Ground Cover area: 27,325 square feet Turt area: 19,334 square feet Hardscape area: 840 square feet EN-2 The Metropolitan Water District easement on the south side of Crescents Way from San Marino to Ridgeline. Ground Cover area: 38,104 square feet Turf area: 41,250 square feet Hardscape area: 9,000 square feet EN-3 The Wilson Median from Wardman Bullock to San Sevaine. Ground Cover area: 9,016 square feet Hardscape area: 11, 088 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2011/12 EN-4 The Planters on the north side of the drainage easement that is between and parallel to Highland and Arapaho east of Etiwanda Ave. Ground Cover area: 63,972 square feet EN-5 The south side of Wilson from 1,115 feet west of San Sevaine to 205 feet east of San Sevaine. The Landscape east of San Sevaine from 24th to south end tract. Ground Cover area: 45,584 square feet Turf area: 3,527 square feet EN-6 The north side of Wilson from Wardman Bullock to Ridgeline. The west side of Ridgeline from Wilson tc 120 feet north of Arcadia. Ground Cover area: 29,226 square feet Turf area: 15,136 square feet Hardscape area: 1,300 square feet EN-7 The parkway on the eastside of Wardman Bullock from 24th street to 857 feet north of Glendora. The cobblestone between the tract wall and the flood wall will be handled as extra for debris pickup and weed control on an as needed basis. Ground Cover area: 10,268 square feet Hardscape area: 31,549 square feet EN-8 The south side of Crescenta Way from Ridgeline to Crestline Ground Cover area: 50,305 square feet Turt area: 35,960 square feet Hardscape area: 10,000 square feet EN-9 The paseo from Meadow Brook to Rock Creek Road. Ground Cover area: 1,400 square feet Turt area: 6,555 square feet Hardscape area: 2,820 square feet EN-10 The paseo from Etiwanda to North Rim Way. The west side of Etiwanda from 175 feet north of North Rim Way to 171 feet south of Golden Prairie Drive. Ground Cover area: 49,020 square feet Turf area: 4,445 square feet Hardscape area: 13,026 square feet EN-11 The paseo south of Ridge Crest Drive to southern boundary of Tract 14139. This site is temporarily maintained by another contractor and was deleted from the contract as of 7- 16-01, however, this site is still the city's property. Ground Cover area: 3,548 square feet Turf area: 800 square feet Hardscape area: 4,280 square feet EN-12 The cul-de-sac on the north side of Ridgecrest at Etiwanda Creek Channel. Ground Cover area: 1,870 square feet Turf area: 700 square feet Hardscape area: 450 square feet EN-13 The east side of San Sevaine from Wilson to 136 feet north of Crescenta. Ground Cover area: 46,611 square feet Turt area: 5,037 square feet EN-14 The west side of San Sevaine from 150' north of Wilson to 136' north of Crescenta. Ground Cover area: 55,166 square feet Turt area: 235 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2011/12 Hardscape area: 6,975 square feet EN-15 The north side of Youngs Canyon Road from 500 feet east of Koch to 692 feet west of Koch. The south side of Youngs Canyon Road from 349 feet east of Koch to 692 feet west of Koch. The east and west side of Koch place from Youngs Canyon Road to 132 feet north of Youngs Canyon Road. The west side of Koch from Youngs Canyon Road to 132 feet south of Youngs Canyon Road. The east side of Koch from 82 feet south of Youngs Canyon Road to Youngs Canyon Road. The trailhead north east of the east end of Youngs Canyon Road to the south end of San Sevaine Horse Trail. The south end of San Sevaine Horse from the trail head to 254 feet north of trailhead. Ground Cover area: 42,925 square feet Hardscape area: 14,308 square feet EN-16 The east side of Wardman Bullock from 225 feet south of San Segundo Drive to 80 feet north of Dona Way. Ground Cover area: 2,056 square feet Hardscape area: 3,450 square feet EN-17 The north side of Colonbero from San Sevaine Channel to Guiders Drive. The south side of Colonbero from San Sevaine Channel to 400 feet north of Guidera Drive. The north side of Aggazzotti from Colonbero to 475 feet east of Colonbero. This site has a pump which will be adjusted and maintained by city personnel. Ground Cover area: 43,241 square feet Hardscape area: 29,125 square feet EN-18 The north side of Aggazzotti Road from San Antonio Drive to San Sevaine Road. The west side of San Sevaine road from Aggazzotti to 702 feet south of Aggazzotti. The East side of San Sevaine Road from 702 feet south of Aggazzotti to Regina. Ground Cover area: 47,823 square feet Hardscape area: 30,986 square feet EN-19 The south side of Wilson from Etiwanda to Estates Way. Ground Cover area: 45,727 square feet Hardscape area: 19,229 square feet EN-20 The east side of Bluegrass from 190 feet south of Vista Verde Dr. to Wilson Avenue. The south side of Wilson Avenue from Bluegrass Avenue to Estates Way Ground Cover area: 85,155 square feet Hardscape area: 48,784 square feet , EN-21 The north side of Wilson from Etiwanda to Cervantes. The Wilson median from Etiwanda To Cervantes. The Westside of Etiwanda From Wilson To Del Norte Place. Ground Cover area: 88,795 square feet Hardscape area: 27,128 square feet EN-22 The north and south side of Vintage from 165 feet east of Country View to 338 feet west of Country View. Ground Cover area: 13,603 square feet Hardscape area: 7,365 square feet EN-23 The north side of Wilson and median from Etiwanda west to Etiwanda. The eastside of Etiwanda from Wilson to 1150 feet north of Wilson. Ground Cover area: 32,027 square feet Hardscape area: 29,567 square feet EN-24 The north side of Vintage from 360 feet west of Ascot to 230 feet east of Countrywood. Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2011/12 Ground Cover area: 34,707 square feet Hardscape area: 92,600 square feet EN-25 The eastside of Blueg rass from Banyan to 610 feet north of Banyan. Ground Cover area: 4,054 square feet Hardscape area: 5,819 square feet EN-26 The south side of Ban yan from Bluegrass to Greenwood. Ground Cover area: 6,240 square feet Hardscape area: 3,200 square feet EN-27 The south side of Ban yan from Laurel Blossom to Etiwanda. Ground Cover area: 1,703 square feet Hardscape area: 8,417 square feet EN-28 The north side of Wilson from Cervantes to 1715 feet west of Cervantes. The west side of Cervantes from Carmel Knolls Drive to Wilson. The paseo from Wilson to Tejas Ct. The median on Wilson from Cervantes to Bluegrass. The following temporary landscape: There is 1 planter on the west side of Altura at Tejas. There are five planters on the south side of Tejas from Altura to 195 feet east of Altura. Ground Cover area: 25,048 square feet Hardscape area: 22,532 square feet EN-29 The south side of Banyan from 787 feet west of East Av. to East Av...The west side of East Avenue from Banyan to 600 feet south of Blue Gum. The east side of East Ave. from Banyan to 537 feet south of Banyan. Ground cover area: 16,111 square feet Hardscape area: 15,774 square feet EN-30 The east side of Bluegrass Ave from 257 feet south of Churchill Drive to 418 feet north of Churchill Drive. Ground Cover area: 9,303 square feet Hardscape area: 5,302 square feet EN-31 The south side of Banyan Ave. from 375 feet south of Cashew Way to Rose Way. The north side of Banyan Ave. from 435 feet west of Peak PI. to Wardman Bullock Rd. Ground cover area: 53,000 square feet Hardscape area: 26,855 square feet EN-32 The landscaping south of the equestrian trail from 210 feet west of Grovewood PI. to 1,170 feet east of Grovewood PI. Ground cover area: 6,900 square feet EN-33 The north side of Youngs Canyon Rd. from 600 feet east of Banyan Ave. to Banyan Ave. The east side of Wardman Bullock Rd. from Banyan Ave. to Wilson Ave. The south side of Wilson Ave. from Wardman Bullock Rd. to 635 feet east of Fields PI. Ground cover area: 66,601 square feet Hardscape area: 46,332 square feet EN-34 The west side of Wardman Bullock Rd. from Wilson Ave. to Banyan Ave. Parkview Way from Wardman Bullock Rd. to Soledad Way. Ground cover area: 56,314 square feet Hardscape area: 28,428 square feet EN-35 The north side of Day Creek Blvd. from Etiwanda Ave. to Indian Wells Place. Ground cover area: 160,737 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2011/12 Hardscape area: 128,254 square feet EN-36 The south side of Day Creek from 380 feet north of Coyote to Etiwanda. The west side of Etiwanda from Day Creek to 170 feet north of North Rim. The hydro seeded landscape area inside the catch basin on the corner of Day Creek and Etiwanda. The west side of Day Creek from 380 feet north of Coyote to Indian Wells. Ground cover area: 58,398 square feet Hardscape area: 68,127 square feet EN-37 The east side of East Av. from 235 feet south of Hunt Club Dr. to 375 feet north of Hunt Club Dr. Ground cover area: 5,559 square feet Hardscape: 5,231 square feet EN-38 The west side of East Ave. from 236 feet north of Philly Dr. to 245 feet south of Philly Dr. Ground cover area: 4,605 square feet Hardscape area: 3,394 square feet Ground cover, shrubs and turf areas that make up parkways, median islands and paseos are maintained under contract by a private landscape maintenance company. Parks are maintained by the City's Park Maintenance Crews. Map of Improvements The following page shows the map of landscaping improvements, including irrigation sites and community trails, to be maintained using District funds. Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2011/12 Z od °d ~~ ~~- `°~ ~ ~ w K ~ Z \ w a ~ w z z ~ W ~ a v •~ O O ~ ¢ a ¢ Sri F C7 ~ C7 r- > rn ~ 3 w Y D O w U m _ \\ ~ ~ a ~ ~ys, °° I a ~ ~ ~ a IDIII , . 1f\\ ~ \ ` I o 1 I z W \ M W ~ ~ a ~ . \~ ~ W ~ Z ~ ~~77~ l i ~I.i' ;~~ ^O Jw eZ~~~~ r ~ `il jiutl~'~I ~li~ \ \~~~f. '7~ ~~..Yi1.jI r ~}+~1 {jF f r N I ~ `1~1 '~ }11 IISF~ C /~ ~zt ~ ~ ~ W `` (~ ~ ~-£~~~~Z ~1`?~~U` 9 ~ F { { { - { n ~ '/~ `'`{~1i1'-, 1~ W ~ ~ O [ << /~ z. ~ ~ I •~ ~ ~ 1 t` \ ~l~l~(~~fl~ ~ '~> ,~~ 1 LL~~ Cm F~jk~~y`~~~)y~Z.u~l ' ~~) ' ~ W. 1F ~~/ ~11~~ W" F ~ ~~\ \ N ~~ ~ /1 ~' W t . ~ In F. . _-_ ~l ll_ °~,•:~~1 I O2! ~OOllf1H NtlW@IVM `~I ~ ~ ,~ y v ~ ~rurn ~ .. ~~: ~~ ~.}^.,_~~t~'/ z \\ ~ ti "rHZ{ ~~ !~ `V a Itw ~ ~r_ A Q YISI?~:~ ~ ~ ~ ~ \ ~ V W _ `IV V, ~ I ._, ~~ ~ - J -- _ _ _ __ . - -~- ., ~r \ ~~ - _ ~ jj~. _ LL t~~ ~ I ° ~ o ~ _ ~ i O ~ _ -- - _ _.._ .C___ ' 1 ~: f_ - -~ ~ N r ~~ ~ Z Q ~~ ~ u /~ ,Y ~ ~ _ 1 ~ _ -_I. ~ ~ ~ Z ~ I t y P I _ 1. ~ °D ~ ~ ~~ W _ Q.lti ~ ' 1 ~ t-7 -m z ~ll~ r ~rtt ~ ~ ~ ~ I-~_L ~ ~~~~;~, 1`.14 ~ Ll ~,..~r 1 t lp~`Tll nV 1SV3~~p7 ~ ~tn -r ~~,_ ,~~~ ~ _ ' ~~~ ~ V r - -~ - { 1. I rf Y i T( ~~• „ ~ ~ ~ 4 ~ x r - o fri ` ~ I ~ ~ _ " r ' ~ , O /~ ~ J -~ ~ ~ r i a 3 ~ AH HONVMIII3', ~c~: !!1' ~ ~/lllt I ~.. ~1 cjl~ ~ ~ ~ I , ~ ~// nV HONVAAll3 I ~ ntl tl4NtlM113 '°zv Y JCf 't.{)y's ~.~ W ~ _ - ~ ~~l i 1 !~ _li ~ ``~ ~t"' ~~ `\ Wy~ ylil(. ~ i -~~.°hl .21 -. ZL ~IL L Nj/ ~r ~~ ~!` ~'~. - - \\ ; W. ~ Y ~ ~ J \~~IJ~7 ~ ~ ~ i j ~'EnII ~ 'w'i 1 Wl~l~ W PLlll~ _ ~~~~j~ ~ Ifl ~ ' ( N ~ ~('`L~~1~ 1 '~L-11 ~~ ~~'~: 2 1 ~ n W Fay{$}li{~:1{[ ~ ). I ~[~~t~ !7III1~ N ~~i Ir f~~l ~ ~ I ~ / ~ -a~E giE 5 ~~ F~9gE ~` 50r'8 ~~ -ir ~ r Il YQ ~ fi€ _ ' ~ I I ~~ ~G~~ ~ - t ~~ I',~ II: J~ 'll ~ ~ i 1~~ ~ ~ ~ \ ~ > -~ 11~i ~1:iw illJ N -J c,~t k ~1 18~N332J0iAV0t ~ ~~ Q ~ '~~ F 12 ( ~ E `~ ~' j ~ ' ~ ~ ~ efry ~. fr g4€aFS4g9 Es~•~ ~ e: ~~~ ~ E~~gfr~~~ 4 B F B ~ ' ~ g ~ v ~ _~~~!IL'+~ ~ \ ~?~u~t~..`{I-'~a ~ ~ f r ~~~~r}nro~'n~~.7I1`~, = h.~ O s t s d3g9ga;;Sg4fi~ E~j€ p E ~ F • SZ ~ U 1 . ~ F I - N_= E;; E L E. ~~E4 aa$pe .n Sp F` a ~E Y~~LScP 6 ESTIMATE OF COSTS The estimated costs of administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing the improvements as described in the Plans and Specifications are summarized below. Each year, as part of the assessment district levy calculation process, the costs and expenses are reviewed and the annual costs are projected for the following fiscal year. District Estimated 2011/12 Bud et Personnel Services Re ular Salaries $167 800.00 Part-time Salaries 10 380.00 Frin a Benefits 79 770.00 Subtotal Personnel $257,950.00 O erations and Maintenance O erations and Maintenance $46 660.00 O erations and Maintenance Facilities 1 000.00 Vehicle 0 erations and Maintenance 2 500.00 Contract Services 300,180.00 Tree Maintenance 6,950.00 Utilities Tele hone Utilities 1 300.00 Water Utilities 221,610.00 Electric Utilities 23,840.00 Assessment Administration 15,080.00 General Overhead 58 710.00 Subtotal O erations and Maintenance $677,830.00 Ca ital Ex enditures Ca ital Pro'ecls 3 850.00 Subtotal Ca ital Ex enditures $3,850.00 Total District Ex enditure Bud et $939,630.00 Total Estimated Assessment $841,620.00 Less Anticipated Delinquencies 39 480.00 Total Estimated Revenue $802,140.00 Plus Operating Reserve Fund Contribution 137 490.00 Total Expenditure Budget $939,830.00 Total Estimated Assessment $841,620.00 Total District EBU Count 2 741.00 Actual Assessment er EBU -Fiscal Year 2011/12 $307.05 Maximum Allowable Assessment er EBU -Fiscal Year 2011/12 $307.05 The maximum allowable assessment per EBU listed in the District budget above, is the amount which was approved in 1996/97 and subsequent District annexations. Each year, prior to the assessments being placed on the tax roll, the City will review the budget and determine the amount needed to Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 10 Fiscal Year 2011/12 maintain the improvements for the upcoming fiscal year. The actual assessment per EBU will be based on the estimated costs of maintenance, available fund balance and maximum allowable assessment with the goal of maintaining the improvements in a satisfactory and healthy condition. The actual assessment amount may be lower than the maximum allowable assessment; however it may not exceed the maximum unless the increase is approved by the property owners in accordance with Proposition 218. It is the intent of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to maintain an Operating Reserve which shall not exceed the estimated costs of maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or when the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The reserve balance information for the District is as follows: Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2011 Reserve Fund Balance $914,640.00 Operating Reserve Contribution -Fiscal Year 2011/12 (137,490.00) Ooerating Reserve Collection -Fiscal Year 2011/12 O.OD Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2012 Reserve Fund Balance $777,150.00 Definitions of Budget Items The following definitions describe the costs and expenses included in the District Budget Personnel Services Regular Salaries: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all full-time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Part Time Salaries: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all part time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Fringe Benefits: This item includes the benefits available to City employees: health care, vacation, sick time, and retirement fund. Operations and Maintenance Contract Services: This item includes the contract costs of a landscape maintenance company responsible for the ongoing maintenance of the District improvements. Tree Maintenance: This item includes the contract costs attributed to maintaining the street trees and other trees throughout the District. Utilities -Water: This item includes the costs to furnish water for the landscaping within the District. Utilities -Electric: This item includes the costs to furnish electricity required for the operation and maintenance of the sprinklers and irrigation controllers. Assessment Administration: This item includes the cost to all particular departments and staff of the City, and consultants for providing the administration, coordination and management of District services, operations, and incidental expenses related to the District. This item also includes creation of an annual engineer's report, resolutions and placing the assessment amounts onto the County tax roll each year, along with responding to any public inquiries and future Proposition 218 balloting proceedings. Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 11 Fiscal Year 2011/12 General Overhead: This item includes the costs of all departments and staff of the City for providing the coordination of District services, inspections, annual bid management, responding to public concerns, public education, accounting, auditing and procedural matters associated with the District. This item also includes an allocation for general City staff time for administrative functions and systems that provide for a functional and operational assessment district within the City's administrative structure. Capital Expenditures: Capital Projects: This item includes new improvements to further enhance the level and quality of service provided within the boundaries of the District. This may include new monuments, irrigation systems, and other large improvements. Operating Reserve Collection: Ooerating Reserve Collection: This item includes the amount to be collected to maintain reserves to enable the City to pay for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or whenever the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The Reserve Fund contribution will continue until such a time the Reserve Fund balance is approximately one half of the annual costs. The fund may be allowed to accumulate in anticipation of any unforeseen expenses not included in the yearly maintenance costs. This may include, but is not limited to, tree replacements, repair of damaged equipment due to vandalism, storms and other similar events. Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 12 Fiscal Year 2011/12 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT General Pursuant to the 1972 Act and Article XIIID, all parcels that have a special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements and services shall be identified, and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel shall be determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of improvements. The 1972 Act, permits the establishment of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include the operation, maintenance and servicing of landscaping improvements. Section 22573 of the 1972 Act requires that maintenance assessments must be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. This Section states: "The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district maybe apportioned by any formula or method which faidy distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements." The determination of whether or not a lot or parcel will benefit from the improvements shall be made pursuant to the Improvement Act of 1911 (Division 7 (commencing with Section 5000) (of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California)." The 1972 Act also permits the designation of zones of benefit within any individual assessment district if "by reasons or variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive different degrees of benefit from the improvement" (Sec. 22547). Article XIIID, Section 4(a) of the California Constitution limits the amount of any assessment to the proportional special benefit conferred on the property. Article XIIID also provides that publicly owned properties must be assessed unless there is clear and convincing evidence that those properties receive no special benefit from the assessment. Exempted from the assessment would be the areas of public streets, public avenues, public lanes, public roads, public drives, public courts, public alleys, public easements and rights-of-ways, public greenbelts and public parkways. The net amount to be assessed may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels. Proposition 218, approved by the voters in November 1996, requires the City to separate general benefit from special benefit, where only special benefit is assessed. Special Benefit The maintenance and servicing of the improvements within the District (which are described in the Description of Services and Improvements Section of this report) are for the benefit of the properties within the District, and as such confer a special and direct benefit to parcels within the District by: • improving the livability, appearance, and desirability for properties within the boundaries of the District, and • ensuring that improvements do not reach a state of deterioration or disrepair so as to be materially detrimental to properties within the District, and Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 13 Fiscal Year 2011/12 • providing beautification, shade and overall enhancement to properties within the District. The above mentioned items affect the assessed property in a way that is particular and distinct from their effect on other parcels and that real property in general and the public at large do not share. They contribute to a specific enhancement of the properties within the District. Since these improvements, including the community trails, were installed and are maintained specifically for the properties within the District; only properties within the District receive a special benefit and are assessed for said maintenance. General Benefit In addition to the special benefits received by parcels within the District, there are derivative general benefits that are conferred on parcels outside the boundaries of the District which include: • the control of dust and insect infestations, and • the visual enhancement of the area to persons or vehicles that may travel through the District. However it has been determined that these benefits are derivative and do not provide a direct benefit to parcels outside of the district that are not being assessed. Method of Assessment Spread Each of the parcels within the District is deemed to receive special benefit from the improvements. Each parcel that has a special benefit conferred upon it as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements are identified and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel is determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of the improvements. When the District was formed in 1989, Article XIIID and Proposition 218 had not yet been passed. Upon the passage of Article XIIID and the subsequent passage of the Proposition Omnibus Implementation Act, new rules were put into place. Due to the changes in legal requirements, as property annexed to the District after the passage of the Assessment Law, the description of the method of assessment became more refined, however, the assessment per parcel has remained the same since the 1996/97 Fiscal Year. Further, no parcel included in the District formation or annexations prior to when the language was refined, are now being levied differently than they were at the time the District was formed or the parcels were annexed. To assess special benefit appropriately, it is necessary to relate the different type of parcel improvements to each other. The Equivalent Benefit Unit ("EBU") method of apportionment uses the single family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single family home equals one Equivalent Benefit Unit (EBU). Every other land-use is converted to EBUs based on an assessment formula that equates to the property's specific development status, type of development (land-use), and size of the property, as compared to a single family home. Vacant parcels are assigned an EBU value of 0.25 per acre because they receive a lesser benefit from the improvements until such.time as development occurs. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land-use types, as assigned by County use code, to determine each parcel's EBU assignment. Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 14 Fiscal Year 2011/12 Land-Use E uivalent Dwellin Units Pro ert T e Count Use Code EBU Value Multi lier Single Family Residential 1.00 Dwelling Unit The use of the latest County Assessor's Secured Roll shall be the basis for the Property Type determination and units/acreage assignments, unless better data is available to the City. In addition, if any parcel within the District is identified by the County Auditor/Controller to be an invalid parcel number for the current fiscal year, the Property Type and EBU assignment shall be based on the correct parcel number and/or new parcel number(s) County use code and subsequent property information. If a single parcel has changed to multiple parcels, the EBU assignment and assessment amount applied to each of the new parcels will be recalculated rather than spread the proportionate share of the original assessment. The following table summarizes the Fiscal Year 2011/12 maximum allowable assessment rates for the District: Maximum Allowable Property Type (County Assessment Rate Actual Assessment Total Total Use Code) er EBU Rate per EBU UnitslAcres EBUs Single Family Residential $307.05 $307.05 2,741 2,741 The total amount of maintenance and incidental costs for maintaining the landscaping and community trail improvements is assessed to the individual parcels of real property within the District in proportion to the special benefit received by such parcels of real property. The proposed individual assessments are shown on the assessment roll in this report. Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 15 Fiscal Year 2011/12 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM An Assessment Diagram for the District is shown on the following page. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the County Assessor of the County San Bernardino, at the time this report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Engineer's Report. Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 16 Fiscal Year 2011/12 ~ , ~ `F~i _ ~ N V '>: + ~ ~ - ,w > J Q Q ~ ® C ~ (~ N N n`d /uaa4~ ~. C1 O ~ h •y ~ N C _ i J m _ ~ O `I~1 N m w 3 ~~ o i 0 Q ~ ~. i nb' lse3 in ® Q nt/ eP - i - ~ ~ ny epuen~!33 - y t - ~- - - a e ~ ~(ea _ .._.._.._.._.., i ~C ny ~a;sayoob - _ - J ' i ny ~a;sayooa ,...~ ~ i i _ ~ -- ~ i ny ua~!II!W f._ .._.._.._.._.._- - ~ - -i ny ua~!II!W i i i i ~~ i n uane ! - -I y H i ----__ my uaneH 1 i nyesow~aH j -- - - -!nyesow~aH i i nV PIeQ!yo~V ~ - j ' ' nb PIe4~4o~b i ny uewllaH i - -- ~.•~" ~ ny uewllaH ~ t•~ L L t v ! ! ! ny p eRau !n 3S ue!lawe~ ~ -- - -~ ~ i ~..~;t ! $!:o..e~~k. . ~ nb'anOJ~ ya€a€€~Fp O^~ ~ c 0] LL Q E'sar>?~?zpe N ~ E~~a;=;g°aspe ` v c ~e~es sga a:=a N N m r'€~~~eua g~3 = ggebPZ~ ~ei: i ?~~£`_u pEp se Y ZF q v~~ Ye~aFY~~i 8 6s~y a~ aCr, eUE@ E2u-~_ . ASSESSMENT ROLL Assessment Roll The assessment roll is a listing of the assessment for Fiscal Year 2011/12 apportioned to each lot or parcel, as shown on the last equalized roll of the Assessor of the County of San Bernardino. The following tables summarize the Fiscal Year 2011/12 maximum and actual assessments for the District: Maximum Allowable Maximum Property Type (County Assessment Rate Total Total Allowable Use Code er EBU Units/Acres EBUs Assessment Single Family Residential $307.05 2,741 2,741 $841,624.05 Actual Property Type (County Assessment Rate Total Total Actual Use Code er EBU Units/Acres EBUs Assessment Single Family Residential $307.05 2,741 2,741 $841,624.05 A copy of the full assessment roll is available for review in the City Clerk's office. Annexations There were no annexations effective for the 2011/12 Fiscal Year: Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 17 Fiscal Year 2011/12 Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2011/2012 City of Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 (South Etiwanda) CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 8 (SOUTH ETIWANDA) 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Phone: 909.477.2740 Fax: 909.477.2741 CITY COUNCIL L. Dennis Michael, Mayor Sam Spagnolo, Mayor Pro Tem William Alexander, Council Member Chuck Buquet, Council Member Diane Williams, Council Member CITY STAFF John R. Gillison, Assistant City Manager Linda D. Daniels, Deputy City Manager William Wittkopf, Public Works Director Ingrid Y. Bruce, GIS/Special Districts Manager Christopher Bopko, Management Analyst III TABLE OF CONTENTS ENGINEER'S LETTER INTRODUCTION 1 3 Reason for Assessment .............................................................................................3 Process for Annual Assessment .................................................................................3 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS 5 Description of the Boundaries of the District ...............................................................5 Description of Improvements and Services ................................................................5 Map of Improvements .................................................................................................6 ESTIMATE OF COSTS 7 District Budget ............................................................................................................7 Definitions of Budget Items .........................................................................................8 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT 10 General .....................................................................................................................10 Special Benefit .........................................................................................................10 General Benefit ........................................................................................................11 Method of Assessment Spread ................................................................................11 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM 13 ASSESSMENT ROLL 14 Assessment Roll .......................................................................................................14 Annexations ..............................................................................................................14 ENGINEER'S LETTER WHEREAS, on July 6th, 2011, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga (the "City"), under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 (the "1972 Act") adopted its Resolution No. 11- 098, aResolution Initiating Proceedings for the Levy of Annual Assessments for Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 (South Etiwanda); and WHEREAS, the Resolution Initiating Proceedings directed staff to prepare and file an Engineer's Report for Fiscal Year 2011/12 pursuant to the requirements of the 1972 Act. The Engineer's Report presents the plans and specifications describing the general nature, location and extent of the improvements to be maintained, an estimate of the costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements for the District for the referenced fiscal year, a diagram far the District, showing the area and properties proposed to be assessed, and an assessment of the estimated costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing the improvements, assessing the net amount upon all assessable lots and/or parcels within the District in proportion to the special benefit received; and NOW THEREFORE, the following assessment is proposed to be authorized in order to pay the estimated costs of maintenance, operation and servicing of the improvements to be paid by the assessable real property within the boundaries of the District in proportion to the special benefit received. The following table summarizes the proposed assessment. SUMMARY OF ASSESSMENT Fiscal Year 2011/12 Total Estimated Assessment $28,620.00 Less Anticipated Delinquency Penalty 2 590.00 Total Estimated Revenue $26,030.00 Less Reserve Fund Contribution 0.00 Total Expenditure Budget $26,030.00 Total District EBU Count 189.00 Actual Assessment per EBU $151.45 Maximum Allowable Assessment per EBU $151.45 In making the assessments contained herein pursuant to the 1972 Act: I have identified all parcels which will have a special benefit conferred upon them from the improvements described in the Special Benefit Section of this Engineer's Report (the "Specially Benefited Parcels"). For particulars as to the identification of said parcels, reference is made to the Assessment Diagram, a copy of which is included in this Engineer's Report. 2. I have evaluated the costs and expenses of the improvements upon the Specially Benefited Parcels. In making such evaluation: a. The proportionate special benefit derived by each Specially Benefited Parcel from the improvements was determined in relationship to the entirety of the maintenance costs of the improvements; Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2011/12 b. No assessment has been imposed on any Specially Benefited Parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on such parcel from the improvements; and c. Any general benefits from the improvements have been separated from the special benefits and only special benefits have been assessed. I, the undersigned, respectfully submit the enclosed Engineer's Report and, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, the Engineer's Report, Assessments, and the Assessment Diagram herein have been prepared and computed in accordance with the order of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the 1972 Act, Article XIII D of the Constitution of the State of California ("Article XIII D") and the Proposition 218 Omnibus Implementation Act ("Proposition 218"), (the 1972 Act, Article XIII D and Proposition 218 are collectively referred to as the "Assessment Law'). Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2011/12 INTRODUCTION Reason for Assessment Approval of the assessment covered by this Engineer's Report will generate the revenue necessary to: Provide for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements described in this Engineer's Report. Maintenance may include but is not limited to, all of the following: the repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement, providing for the life, growth, health and beauty of the landscaping, including cultivation, irrigation, trimming, spraying, fertilizing or treating for disease or injury, the removal of trimming, rubbish, debris and other solid waste, the maintenance, repair and replacement as necessary of all irrigation systems and the removal of graffiti from walls immediately adjacent to the cultivated areas. Servicing means the furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operating and servicing of any improvement. Servicing shall also include vehicle, equipment, capital improvements and administrative costs associated with the annual administration and operation of the District. Process for Annual Assessment The City cannot levy and collect annual assessments within the District without complying with the procedures specified in the 1972 Act. On an annual basis, an Engineer's Report must be prepared which contains a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the district. The City Council must also adopt a resolution of intention which: • Declares the intention of the City Council to levy and collect assessments within the assessment district for the fiscal year stated therein. • Generally describes the existing and proposed improvements and any substantial changes proposed to be made in existing improvements. • Refers to the assessment district by its distinctive designation and indicate the general location of the district. • Refers to the report of the engineer, on file with the clerk, for a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the district. • Gives notice of the time and place for public hearing by the City Council on the levy of the proposed assessment. • States whether the assessment is proposed to increase from the previous year. If the assessments are to be levied in the same or lesser amounts than the maximum assessment amount approved, the clerk shall give notice by causing the resolution of intention to be published. Any interested person may, prior to the conclusion of the public hearing, file a written protest which shall state all grounds of objection. The protest shall contain a description sufficient to identify the property owned by the property owner filing the protest. During the course or upon conclusion of the hearing, the City Council may order changes in any of the matters provided in the report, including changes in the improvements, any zones within the assessment district, and the proposed diagram or the proposed assessment. Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2011/12 The City Council, upon conclusion of the public hearing must then adopt a resolution confirming the diagram and assessment, either as originally proposed or as changed by it. The adoption of the resolution shall constitute the levy of an assessment for the fiscal year referred to in the assessment. If the assessment to be levied exceeds the maximum assessment amount previously approved, the City must comply with the procedures specified in Article XIII D and Proposition 218. The voters in the State of California in November 1996 added Article XIII D to the California Constitution imposing, among other requirements, the necessity for the City to conduct an assessment ballot procedure to enable the owners of each property on which assessments are proposed to be enacted or increased, the opportunity to express their support for, or opposition to the proposed assessment or increase in such assessment. The basic steps of the assessment ballot procedure are outlined below. The City must prepare a Notice of Public Hearing ("Notice"), which describes, along with other mandated information, the reason for the proposed assessments, and to provide a date and time of a public hearing to be held on the matter. The City must also prepare an assessment ballot, which clearly gives the property owner the ability to sign and mark their assessment ballot either in favor of, or in opposition to the proposed assessment. The Notice and assessment ballot are mailed to each affected property owner within the District a minimum of 45 days prior to the public hearing date as shown in the Notice. The City may also hold community meetings with the property owners to discuss the issues facing the District and to answer property owner questions directly. After the Notice and assessment ballot are mailed, property owners are given until the close of the public hearing, stated in the Notice, to return their signed and marked assessment ballot. During the public hearing, property owners are given the opportunity to address the City Council and ask questions or voice their concerns. At the public hearing, the returned assessment ballots received prior to the close of the public hearing are tabulated, weighted by the proposed assessment amount on each property and the results are announced by the City Council. Article XIII D provides that if, as a result of the assessment ballot proceeding, a majority protest is found to exist, the City Council shall not have the authority to levy and collect the assessments as proposed. A majority protest exists if the assessments represented by ballots submitted in opposition exceed those submitted in favor of the assessment. All returned ballots are tabulated and weighted according to the financial obligation of each particular parcel. If there is no majority protest as described above, the City Council may approve the proposed assessments. If there is a majority protest, as described above, the City will not levy and collect any assessments. Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 4 Fiscal Year 2011/12 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS The District provides for the administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing of various improvements located within the public right-of-way and dedicated easements within the boundaries of the District. Description of the Boundaries of the District The District is located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California. The boundaries of the District are generally described as that area known as South Etiwanda, which is south of the I-210 Freeway along Fisher Drive, east of East Avenue, including the south side of Highstone Manor Court, the south side of Smokestone Street, and to the San Bernardino County Flood Control drainage basin on east side. Typically parcels have been annexed to the District as they have developed. Reference is also made to the Assessment Diagram included in this Report. Description of Improvements and Services The improvements are the maintenance and servicing of landscaping sites and appurtenant facilities throughout the District. The various landscaping sites that are maintained consist of parkways, median islands, street trees, paseos and community trails located within street right-of-ways and dedicated public easements which are within the boundaries of the District. The landscaping maintenance includes, but is not limited to, shrubs, turf, tree trimming in irrigated City parkways and paseos, weed and pest control, landscape irrigation systems and testing, trash, debris and graffiti removal, and associated appurtenant facilities. Services include personnel, materials, contracting services, utilities, and all necessary costs associated with the maintenance, replacement and repair required to keep the improvements in a healthy, vigorous and satisfactory condition. In addition, it is the City's intention to continue to use cost effective materials, including the future ability to replace landscaping with drought resistant or low water use plants, in order to lower expenses of the District. The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows: Site # Descriptive Location SE-1 The east side of East Ave. from 480 feet south of Catalpa St. to 182 feet north of Catalpa St. The north and south side of Catalpa St. from East Ave. to Brownstone PI. Ground Cover area: 10,355 square feet Turf area: 6,258 square feet Hardscape area: 4,050 square feet SE-2 The south side of Fisher Dr. from 361 feet east of East Ave. to 210 feet east of Starstone PI. Ground Cover area: 9,366 square feet Hardscape area: 4,074 square feet SE-3 The south side of Fis her Dr., from 860 feet west of Mulberry St. to Mulberry St. Ground Cover area: 3,676 square feet Hardscape area: 6,910 square feet Total Ground Cover: 23,397 square feet Total Turf: 6,258 square feet Total Hardscape: 15,034 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Prepared by NBS -Fiscal Year 2011/12 Ground cover, shrubs and turf areas that make up parkways, median islands and paseos are maintained under contract by a private landscape maintenance company. Parks are maintained by the City's Park Maintenance Crews Map of Improvements The following page shows the map of landscaping improvements, including irrigation sites and community trails, to be maintained using District funds. Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 6 Prepared by NBS -Fiscal Year 2011/12 a ~ w ~ w a ~ m w ~° ~'s~, ~ ° J ° m N a N a W ~~ aG Y ro O W U ~ D ~ W ~ ~6°z ~ ~ a ~ a ~ ~ ~ a l ~ ~ ~ I 1~ I l i , ~2 0 2 m d -~ / ~ ~~~ ;' ~ Z '~~ V °' ~ i 11_~ a C C _~ - G~ G1 > f o C ~ I ~ _ ~- ~ '~ ~ I _ O -- - - -~- ~, { _~ - ~~ v I -- ~~~~ ^. 1 '--k-~_ - > ~ o, _ a '~l ~ ~ - __ ~ -- - ~ ---~-- ~ I~ _1-} i~ ~ i ~-_ . IIIF _, . ' ~ ~ , ~_ _ -~ ~~~ a _r f I ~ €a~ ; ~s~ aF=~ J ~ ~ l I ~ ~ ~ EE~~eae ,E~€ I ~ @@i~ py w. I.~ l J I ~ ~ ~ €~a~@°~BED eg~~s~E fll _ ~sa ~a gaE u~ eae _~'eYga oc`i - l ¢ ~ ~ I /~V 1SV3 gs~g'€, ~~~~ °E a~¢:. `/) T I k z ~! r a~ s ~g g a~ I I ~~~ ~I+~III ~_ ~ ! f ~ I ESTIMATE OF COSTS The estimated costs of administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing the improvements as described in the Plans and Specifications are summarized below. Each year, as part of the assessment district levy calculation process, the costs and expenses are reviewed and the annual costs are projected for the following fiscal year. District Estimated 2011/12 Budget Personnel Services Regular Salaries $1,450.00 Part-time Salaries 0.00 Fringe Benefits 680.00 Subtotal Personnel $2,130.00 Operations and Maintenance Operations and Maintenance $1,000.00 Emergency Equipment and Vehicle Rental 0.00 Contract Services 9,630.00 Tree Maintenance 4,300.00 Utilities Water Utilities 4,920.00 Electric Utilities 890.00 Assessment Administration 1,040.00 General Overhead 2.120.00 Subtotal Operations and Maintenance $23,900.00 Capital Expenditures Capital Projects 50.00 Subtotal Capital Expenditures $0.00 Total District Expenditure Budget ~ $26,030.00 Total Estimated Assessment $28,620.00 Less Anticipated Delinquency Penalty (2.590.0)0 Total Estimated Revenue $26,030.00 Less Reserve Fund Contribution 0.00 Total Expenditure Budget $26,030.00 Total Estimated Assessment $28,620.00 Total District EBU Count 189.00 Actual Assessment per EBU -Fiscal Year 2011 /12 $151.45 Maximum Allowable Assessment per EBU -Fiscal Year 2011/12 $151.45 The maximum allowable assessment per EBU listed in the District budget above, is the amount which was approved in 1989/90, when the District was formed, and subsequent District annexations. Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 7 Prepared by NBS -Fiscal Year 2011/12 Each year, prior to the assessments being placed on the tax roll, the City will review the budget and determine the amount needed to maintain the improvements for the upcoming fiscal year. The actual assessment per EBU will be based on the estimated costs of maintenance, available fund balance and maximum allowable assessment with the goal of maintaining the improvements in a satisfactory and healthy condition. The actual assessment amount may be lower than the maximum allowable assessment; however it may not exceed the maximum unless the increase is approved by the property owners in accordance with Proposition 218. It is the intent of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to maintain an Operating Reserve which shall not exceed the estimated costs of maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or when the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The reserve balance information for the District is as follows: Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2011 Reserve Fund Balance $48,250.00 Operating Reserve Contribution -Fiscal Year 2011/12 0.00 Operating Reserve Collection -Fiscal Year 2011/12 2.590.00 Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2012 Reserve Fund Balance $50,840.00 Definitions of Budget Items The following definitions describe the costs and expenses included in the District Budget: Operations and Maintenance Contract Services: This item includes the contract costs of a landscape maintenance company responsible for the ongoing maintenance of the District improvements. Tree Maintenance: This item includes the contract costs attributed to maintaining the street trees and other trees throughout the District. Utilities -Water: This item includes the costs to furnish water for the landscaping within the District. Utilities -Electric: This item includes the costs to furnish electricity required for the operation and maintenance of the sprinklers and irrigation controllers. Assessment Administration: This item includes the cost to all particular departments and staff of the City, and consultants for providing the administration, coordination and management of District services, operations, and incidental expenses related to the District. This item also includes creation of an annual engineer's report, resolutions and placing the assessment amounts onto the County tax roll each year, along with responding to any public inquiries and future Proposition 218 balloting proceedings. General Overhead: This item includes the costs of all departments and staff of the City for providing the coordination of District services, inspections, annual bid management, responding to public concerns, public education, accounting, auditing and procedural matters associated with the District. This item also includes an allocation for general City staff time for administrative functions and systems that provide for a functional and operational assessment district within the City's administrative structure. Capital Expenditures: Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Prepared by NBS -Fiscal Year 2011/12 Capital Projects: This item includes new improvements to further enhance the level and quality of service provided within the boundaries of the District. This may include new monuments, irrigation systems, and other large improvements. Operating Reserve Collection: Operatino Reserve Collection: This item includes the amount to be collected to maintain reserves to enable the City to pay for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or whenever the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The Reserve Fund contribution will continue until such a time the Reserve Fund balance is approximately one half of the annual costs. The fund may be allowed to accumulate in anticipation of any unforeseen expenses not included in the yearly maintenance costs. This may include, but is not limited to, tree replacements, repair of damaged equipment due to vandalism, storms and other similar events. Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Prepared by NBS -Fiscal Year 2011/12 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT General Pursuant to the 1972 Act and Article XIII D, all parcels that have a special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements and services shall be identified, and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel shall be determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of improvements. The 1972 Act, permits the establishment of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include the operation, maintenance and servicing of landscaping improvements. Section 22573 of the 1972 Act requires that maintenance assessments must be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. This Section states: "The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district maybe apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements." The determination of whether or not a lot or parcel will benefit from the improvements shall be made pursuant to the Improvement Act of 1911 (Division 7 (commencing with Section 5000) (of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California)." The 1972 Act also permits the designation of zones of benefit within any individual assessment district if "by reasons or variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive different degrees of benefit from the improvement" (Sec. 22547). Article XIII D, Section 4(a) of the California Constitution limits the amount of any assessment to the proportional special benefit conferred on the property. Article XIII D also provides that publicly owned properties must be assessed unless there is clear and convincing evidence that those properties receive no special benefit from the assessment. Exempted from the assessment would be the areas of public streets, public avenues, public lanes, public roads, public drives, public courts, public alleys, public easements and rights-of-ways, public greenbelts and public parkways. The net amount to be assessed may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels. Proposition 218, approved by the voters in November 1996, requires the City to separate general benefit from special benefit, where only special benefit is assessed. Benefit The maintenance and servicing of the improvements within the District (which are described in the Description of Services and Improvements Section of this report) are for the benefit of the properties within the District, and as such confer a special and direct benefit to parcels within the District by: improving the livability, appearance, and desirability for properties within the boundaries of the District, and ensuring that improvements do not reach a state of deterioration or disrepair so as to be materially detrimental to properties within the District, and Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 10 Prepared by NBS -Fiscal Year 2011/12 • providing beautification, shade and overall enhancement to properties within the District. The above mentioned items affect the assessed property in a way that is particular and distinct from their effect on other parcels and that real property in general and the public at large do not share. They contribute to a specific enhancement of the properties within the District. Since these improvements, including the community trails, were installed and are maintained specifically far the properties within the District; only properties within the District receive a special benefit and are assessed for said maintenance. General Benefit In addition to the special benefits received by parcels within the District, there are derivative general benefits that are conferred on parcels outside the boundaries of the District which include: • the control of dust and insect infestations, and • the visual enhancement of the area to persons or vehicles that may travel through the District. However it has been determined that these benefits are derivative and do not provide a direct benefit to parcels outside of the district that are not being assessed. Method of Assessment Each of the parcels within the District is deemed to receive special benefit from the improvements. Each parcel that has a special benefit conferred upon it as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements are identified and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel is determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of the improvements. To assess special benefit appropriately, it is necessary to relate the different type of parcel improvements to each other. The Equivalent Benefit Unit ("EBU") method of apportionment uses the single family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single family home equals one Equivalent Benefit Unit (EBU). Every other land-use is converted to EBUs based on an assessment formula that equates to the property's specific development status, type of development (land-use), and size of the property, as compared to a single family home. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land-use types, as assigned by County use code, to determine each parcel's EBU assignment. Land-Use Equivalent Dwelling Units Pro ert T e Coun Use Code EBU Value Multi tier Single Family Residential 1.00 Dwelling Unit The use of the latest County Assessor's Secured Roll shall be the basis for the Property Type determination and units/acreage assignments, unless better data is available to the City. In addition, if any parcel within the District is identified by the County Auditor/Controller to be an invalid parcel number for the current fiscal year, the Property Type and EBU assignment shall be based on the correct parcel number and/or new parcel number(s) County use code and subsequent property information. If a single parcel has changed to multiple parcels, the EBU assignment and assessment amount applied to each of the new parcels will be recalculated rather than spread the proportionate share of the original assessment. Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 11 Prepared by NBS -Fiscal Year 2011/12 The following table summarizes the Fiscal Year 2011/12 maximum allowable assessment rates for the District: Maximum Allowable Property Type (County Assessment Rate Actual Assessment Total Total Use Code) er EBU Rate per EBU Units/Acres EBUs Single Family Residential $151.45 $151.45 189.00 189.00 The total amount of maintenance and incidental costs for maintaining the landscaping and community trail improvements is assessed to the individual parcels of real property within the District in proportion to the special benefit received by such parcels of real property. The proposed individual assessments are shown on the assessment roll in this report. Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 12 Prepared by NBS -Fiscal Year 2011/12 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM An Assessment Diagram for the District is shown on the following page. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the County Assessor of the County San Bernardino, at the time this report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Engineer's Report. Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 13 Prepared by NBS -Fiscal Year 2011/12 N/ +~ V .~ y.a .y O C AC W ~1 •~ Q V a C J ny ua~!II!W ny uaneH ny esowlaH ny Pleq!yoJy ny uewllaH ;g ue!!awe~ c N ._.. ~. ny epuenn!ti3 9 ~aaJ~ fed ny Ja~sayooa ny Ja~sayooa i - - - -- ---~ ny ua~!II!W my uaneH s - my esowlaH i jnV Pley!4o1V - ~" ~ny uewllaH ~t'~~~ r z ~ ny pJe6auy~ s~~s. @€~€F a~ ~ a c N m o~ x ii U ny ~(JJay~ v 0! N C _ J m ~ N r f0 m O O V_ Q ~E J Q ~ U ~ ~. S ~ J ti•~ nH ise3 in N ® ~ O 0 N O v ..~_.._.._..~ ny epuenn43 •~ d' ~ C L J ~ N N (0 m _.._.._~_ _ _. ntJ aA01~ 00 ~ (~ -_ 3 r t O a0 O O LL @{E $€€ge'aa ~' L 6~~s tng[F~~ 6Fae~FS~e~~'~ Bgg ~S.z~i~e~: $ a2Q z a 94 ~i f?-sEag y ~g2 Ea Y~~ cs°'~°~g€e€B Ega'a4`3E€ es fE~a&x€Bsl; °s `e ASSESSMENT ROLL Assessment Roll The assessment roll is a listing of the assessment for Fiscal Year 2011/12 apportioned to each lot or parcel, as shown on the last equalized roll of the Assessor of the County of San Bernardino. The following tables summarize the Fiscal Year 2011/12 maximum and actual assessments for the District: Maximum Allowable Maximum Property Type (County Assessment Rate Total Total Allowable Use Code er EBU Units/Acres EBUs Assessment Single Family Residential $151.45 189.00 189.00 $28,624.05 Actual Property Type (County Assessment Rate Total Total Actual Use Code er EBU Units/Acres EBUs Assessment Single Family Residential $151.45 189.00 189.00 $28,624.05 A copy of the full assessment roll is available for review in the City Clerk's office. Annexations The following annexations are effective for the 2011/12 Fiscal Year: Assessor's Parcel Annexation Total Total Property Type Number Date Pro'ect Units/Acres EBUs Coun Use Code 0227-071-17 6/2/2010 0227-071-17 5.0 1 Church Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 14 Prepared by NBS -Fiscal Year 2011/12 Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2011/2012 City of Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 (Lower Etiwanda) CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 9 (LOWER ETIWANDA) 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Phone: 909.477.2740 Fax: 909.477.2741 CITY COUNCIL L. Dennis Michael, Mayor Sam Spagnolo, Mayor Pro Tem William Alexander, Council Member Chuck Buquet, Council Member Diane Williams, Council Member CITY STAFF John R. Gillison, Assistant City Manager Linda D. Daniels, Deputy City Manager William Wittkopf, Public Works Director Ingrid Y. Bruce, GIS/Special Districts Manager Christopher Bopko, Management Analyst III TABLE OF CONTENTS ENGINEER'S LETTER INTRODUCTION 3 Reason for Assessment .............................................................................................3 Process for Annual Assessment .................................................................................3 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS 5 Description of the Boundaries of the District ...............................................................5 Description of Improvements and Services ................................................................5 Map of Improvements .................................................................................................7 ESTIMATE OF COSTS 8 District Budget ............................................................................................................8 Definitions of Budget Items .........................................................................................9 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT 11 General .....................................................................................................................11 Special Benefit .........................................................................................................11 General Benefit ........................................................................................................12 Method of Assessment Spread ................................................................................12 Maximum and Historical Assessments .....................................................................13 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM 14 ASSESSMENT ROLL 15 Assessment Roll .......................................................................................................15 Annexations ..............................................................................................................15 ENGINEER'S LETTER WHEREAS, on July 6`", 2011, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga (the "City"), under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 (the "1972 Act") adopted its Resolution No. 11- 098, aResolution Initiating Proceedings for the Levy of Annual Assessments for Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 (Lower Etiwanda) (the "District"); and WHEREAS, the Resolution Initiating Proceedings directed staff to prepare and file an Engineer's Report for Fiscal Year 2011/12 pursuant to the requirements of the 1972 Act. The Engineer's Report presents the plans and specifications describing the general nature, location and extent of the' improvements to be maintained, an estimate of the costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements for the District for the referenced fiscal year, a diagram for the District, showing the area and properties proposed to be assessed, and an assessment of the estimated costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing the improvements, assessing the net amount upon all assessable lots and/or parcels within the District in proportion to the special benefit received; and NOW THEREFORE, the following assessment is proposed to be authorized in order to pay the estimated costs of maintenance, operation and servicing of the improvements to be paid by the assessable real property within the boundaries of the District in proportion to the special benefit received. The following table summarizes the proposed assessment. SUMMARY OF ASSESSMENT Fiscal Year 2011/12 Total Estimated Assessment $379,530.00 Plus Anticipated Delinquency Penalty 970.00 Total Estimated Revenue $380,500.00 Plus Reserve Fund Contribution 317 860.00 Total Expenditure Budget $698,360.00 Total District EBU Count 2,029.56 Actual Assessment per EBU $187.00 Maximum Allowable Assessment per EBU $501.55 In making the assessments contained herein pursuant to the 1972 Act: I have identified all parcels which will have a special benefit conferred upon them from the improvements described in the Special Benefit Section of this Engineer's Report (the "Specially Benefited Parcels"). For particulars as to the identification of said parcels, reference is made to the Assessment Diagram, a copy of which is included in this Engineer's Report. 2. I have evaluated the costs and expenses of the improvements upon the Specially Benefited Parcels. In making such evaluation: a. The proportionate special benefit derived by each Specially Benefited Parcel from the improvements was determined in relationship to the entirety of the maintenance costs of the improvements; Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2011/12 b. No assessment has been imposed on any Specially Benefited Parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on such parcel from the improvements; and c. Any general benefits from the improvements have been separated from the special benefits and only special benefits have been assessed. I, the undersigned, respectfully submit the enclosed Engineer's Report and, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, the Engineer's Report, Assessments, and the Assessment Diagram herein have been prepared and computed in accordance with the order of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the 1972 Act, Article XIII D of the Constitution of the State of California ("Article XIII D") and the Proposition 218 Omnibus Implementation Act ("Proposition 218"), (the 1972 Act, Article XIII D and Proposition 218 are collectively referred to as the "Assessment Law"). of Engineering Services/City Engineer Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2011112 INTRODUCTION Reason for Assessment Approval of the assessment covered by this Engineer's Report will generate the revenue necessary to: Provide for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements described in this Engineer's Report. Maintenance may include but is not limited to, all of the following: the repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement, providing for the life, growth, health and beauty of the landscaping, including cultivation, irrigation, trimming, spraying, fertilizing or treating for disease or injury, the removal of trimming, rubbish, debris and other solid waste, the maintenance, repair and replacement as necessary of all irrigation systems and the removal of graffiti from walls immediately adjacent to the cultivated areas. Servicing means the furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operating and servicing of any improvement. Servicing shall also include vehicle, equipment, capital improvements and administrative costs associated with the annual administration and operation of the District. Process for Annual Assessment The City cannot levy and collect annual assessments within the District without complying with the procedures specified in the 1972 Act. On an annual basis, an Engineer's Report must be prepared which contains a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the district. The City Council must also adopt a resolution of intention which: • Declares the intention of the City Council to levy and collect assessments within the assessment district for the fiscal year stated therein. • Generally describes the existing and proposed improvements and any substantial changes proposed to be made in existing improvements. • Refers to the assessment district by its distinctive designation and indicate the general location of the district. • Refers to the report of the engineer, on file with the clerk, for a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the district. • Gives notice of the time and place for public hearing by the City Council on the levy of the proposed assessment. • States whether the assessment is proposed to increase from the previous year. If the assessments are to be levied in the same or lesser amounts than the maximum assessment amount approved, the clerk shall give notice by causing the resolution of intention to be published. Any interested person may, prior to the conclusion of the hearing, file a written protest which shall state all grounds of objection. The protest shall contain a description sufficient to identify the property owned by the property owner filing the protest. During the course or upon conclusion of the public hearing, the City Council may order changes in any of the matters provided in the report, including changes in the improvements, any zones within the assessment district, and the proposed diagram or the proposed assessment. The City Council, upon conclusion of the public hearing must then adapt a resolution confirming the diagram and assessment, either as originally proposed or as changed by it. The adoption of the resolution shall constitute the levy of an assessment for the fiscal year referred to in the assessment. Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2011/12 If the assessment to be levied exceeds the maximum assessment amount previously approved, the City must comply with the procedures specified in Article XIII D and Proposition 218. The voters in the State of California in November 1996 added Article XIII D to the California Constitution imposing, among other requirements, the necessity for the City to conduct an assessment ballot procedure to enable the owners of each property on which assessments are proposed to be enacted or increased, the opportunity to express their support for, or opposition to the proposed assessment or increase in such assessment. The basic steps of the assessment ballot procedure are outlined below. The City must prepare a Notice of Public Hearing ("Notice"), which describes, along with other mandated information, the reason for the proposed assessments, and to provide a date and time of a public hearing to be held on the matter. The City must also prepare an assessment ballot, which clearly gives the property owner the ability to sign and mark their assessment ballot either in favor of, or in apposition to the proposed assessment. The Notice and assessment ballot are mailed to each affected property owner within the District a minimum of 45 days prior to the public hearing date as shown in the Notice. The City may also hold community meetings with the property owners to discuss the issues facing the District and to answer property owner questions directly. After the Notice and assessment ballot are mailed, property owners are given until the close of the public hearing, stated in the Notice, to return their signed and marked assessment ballot. During the public hearing, property owners are given the opportunity to address the City Council and ask questions or voice their concerns. At the public hearing, the returned assessment ballots received prior to the close of the public hearing are tabulated, weighted by the proposed assessment amount on each property and the results are announced by the City Council. Article XIII D provides that if, as a result of the assessment ballot proceeding, a majority protest is found to exist, the City Council shall not have the authority to levy and collect the assessments as proposed. A majority protest exists if the assessments represented by ballots submitted in opposition exceed those submitted in favor of the assessment. All returned ballots are tabulated and weighted according to the financial obligation of each particular parcel. If there is no majority protest as described above, the City Council may approve the proposed assessments. If there is a majority protest, as described above, the City will not levy and collect any assessments. Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 4 Fiscal Year 2011112 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS The District provides for the administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing of various improvements located within the public right-of-way and dedicated easements within the boundaries of the District. Description of the Boundaries of the District The District is located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California. The boundaries of the District are generally described as that area known as Lower Etiwanda, which south of Victoria Street, north of Foothill Boulevard, generally east of Etiwanda Avenue and the I-15 freeway and west of East Avenue. Typically parcels have been annexed to the District as they have developed. Reference is also made to the Assessment Diagram included in this Report. Description of Improvements and Services The improvements are the maintenance and servicing of landscaping sites and appurtenant facilities throughout the District. The various landscaping sites that are maintained consist of parkways, median islands, street trees, paseos and community trails located within street right-of-ways and dedicated public easements which are within the boundaries of the District. The landscaping maintenance includes, but is not limited to, shrubs, turf, tree trimming in irrigated City parkways and paseos, weed and pest control, landscape irrigation systems and testing, trash, debris and graffiti removal, and associated appurtenant facilities. Services include personnel, materials, contracting services, utilities, and all necessary costs associated with the maintenance, replacement and repair required to keep the improvements in a healthy, vigorous and satisfactory condition. In addition, it is the City's intention to continue to use cost effective materials, including the future ability to replace landscaping with drought resistant or low water use plants, in order to lower expenses of the District. The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows: Parks: Garcia Park (formerly known as South Etiwanda Park). Site # Descriptive Location 9-1 The west side of East Ave. from 380 feet north of Chateau to 290 feet south of Chateau. Ground Cover area: 4,426 square feet Hardscape area: 7,360 square feet 9-2 The west side of East Ave. from 339 feet north of Brookfield to 157 feet north of Brookfield. Brookfield from East Ave. to Oak Crest. The east side of Oak Crest to 137 feet north of Brookfield. Ground Cover area: 2,390 square feet Hardscape area: 6,874 square feet 9-3 The west side of East Ave. from 790 feet north of Highfield to 256 feet south of Highfield. Ground Cover area: 8,769 square feet Hardscape area: 10,669 square feet 9-4 The west side of East Ave. From 295 feet north of Via Veneto To Via Veneto. The north side of Via Veneto From East Ave to Dolcetto. The east side of Dolcetto from Via Veneto to Miller Ave. The south side of Miller Ave from 372 feet west of Dolcetto to 240 feet east Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 5 Fiscal Year 2011/12 of Dolcetto. The west side of Dolcetto from Miller to Garcia. The north side of Garcia from Dolcetto to Etiwanda Ave. Ground Cover area: 48,612 square feet Hardscape area: 28,746 square feet 9-5 The north side of Miller from 429 feet west of Dolcetto to 1029 feet west of Dolcetto Ground Cover area: 6,519 square feet Hardscape area: 3,325 square feet 9-6 The north side of Miller From 254 feet east of Dolcetto to 167 feet west of Dolcetto. Ground Cover area: 4,089 square feet Hardscape area: 2,854 square feet 9-7 The south side of Lima, from 167 feet west of Brisas, to Green Glen. Ground Cover area: 2,580 square feet 9-8 The south side of Baseline from Etiwanda Av. to Shelby. The Baseline median from Etiwanda to 473 feet east of Shelby. Ground cover area: 16,395 square feet Hardscape area: 14,558 square feet 9-9 The north side of Candlewood St from Exbury St to Etiwanda Avenue. Ground Cover area: 3,362 square feet Hardscape area: 786 square feet 9-10 The north side of Baseline from 522 feet east of Forester to 180 feet west of Forester. The Baseline median from 503 feet east of Forester to 200 feet west of Forester. Ground cover area: 16,930 square feet Hardscape area: 13,600 square feet 9-11 The north side of Mueller Ct. from 40 feet past the east end of Mueller Ct. to 20 feet east of Dicarlo PI. Ground cover area: 9,420 square feet Hardscape area: 742 square feet 9-12 The north and south sides of Highland Av. from 217 feet west of Norcia Dr. to 210 feet east of Dicarlo PI. Ground cover area: 12,471 square feet Hardscape area: 14,445 square feet 9-13 The south side of Carnesi Dr. from Etiwanda Av. to 395 feet east of Murietta Ct. Ground cover area: 8,919 square feet Hardscape area: 6,203 square feet FH-17 The Foothill Blvd. median from Etiwanda Av. to Cornwell Av. Ground cover area: 8,275 square feet Ground cover, shrubs and turt areas that make up parkways, median islands and paseos are maintained under contract by a private landscape maintenance company. Parks are maintained by the City's Park Maintenance Crews Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2011/12 Map of Improvements The following page shows the map of landscaping improvements, including irrigation sites and community trails, to be maintained using District funds. Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2011/12 .>~ -, I1 _~ .III L.;_l ] I ~ !-I~~./ V I ~ 11 ~~~r--~I I ! Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 Improvement Map cY~I _~ 1-1 [ I ~ i _~ ~;1L t-. -- ~ -- -I I l,l ~r_I`T5•SOUT~'r ~~ 9r RAAi1P I~ettTTTTTTTTTT7 t\~ Tn„~ - I~~I~:~ . ~_ll _ ITT is _- -- _r~-iJ I 1 - .'I 1 Trl__ ~7'~"-I~~_ C_ll1ll11:L __ i ~i-k~ei~~ r - - - ~i __ _ BASEiLINE RD 8' U9-8 J~ -'tea .}~ ~rn ~ k C\"',.1~ rVJl~' ] Q . ~TT1`~1`~:11}i ~l li~"`,,..;~~~ ~~_ ~IU~IIIIii n1I3 ~'' tt1 fE {F~ Q~U2iGa• E 1: T,..Il~[lIIII?IIl-:C99 I ~ ~~~~~ ~ W `a~- F:r I~CHURCHIST~~ r__` ~~o (~~~~y as ~ r.. ~ 1~ r' - -1--i_ I_~~ ~ j t .. ~ J ~ ~~~~~- ufir v I ,, I -w w_.- 1 ~'~ T (- - . ICTORIA GARDENS L_N ~ / I ~` ~/~ / ~T-Tr- - I r~r j ' f~OQ ~ ~_ ~ ~~~ ~ C 1 ~~ --~.,`'~ FOOTHILL BL_. _ I ...~ 1TTi __ ~ { 1/ ~ ~~;:1LT~TI >- ~~~ , ,~ I ,y~ oF~~ ~ ~ - -- ~~ ~~ ~ - - 0.250.125 0 I ~ I ~ , 1~~~ Q WATER METER O IRRIGATION PUMP -•••-• PE TRAIL IRRIGATION LINE - PARKS Q LMD 9 Boundary MAJOR STREET FREEWAY PARCELS ~F BniGf Hlk+IP~ ~ 7~ H Ill tl~k' fi rrI ~. me mapa,affi eM paopreplilc lnbrmatlonflnfamwEan~ re dr; - --- I i I ..aimw W.m mrouan ma city orr:anmo acanonua It7 ~ IllltJ / an praaemea esa puEfc maurca orpenamlinromwtion. m. city or Rendio eueamonpa makes norimpfias no wairenn.rewasamafion oreuaremea as loaw mmam ~~~ 7(~7j(7r[~ rQJ j [ 7 f 7 FH-171S IN LMD9 BUT MAINTAINED BY MARIPOSA ..QU.nca,.«ureay soirylmnazs ornmafinau Dram Iniame4an praNea b you ~eraln. TM1e user ebud iwt rely assn ma brom®uon r«am raasonamroalreaaam inaaoenaanW venry any ens an mramonon pmamaa nereb. mecirymrsezno acmonga eapfiWry.na wnnan kinmaon F 3 r ~ 7 alsaalma any ens ell repreaentaM1Ona aid wammees. inaumna. i L ~ 7 Lm nd fiMba b, Me ImpfieO werrenan ai merckematilay eM 0.25 Miles / fimw a. puacudr purpose. m. city oraanare cuc.maq. .~.fin.per.~,~nara,~m,amfiedlm.raaaml~aara~a auaetlon br N any snare, oMssima ar beauredes In enYlmomutlon Movlaea eidbr () erry ecfian or inac4on arunkg sue b airy parson reliance upanga Inbmeaon rvalMda Mreln. ESTIMATE OF COSTS The estimated costs of administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing the improvements as described in the Plans and Specifications are summarized below. Each year, as part of the assessment district levy calculation process, the costs and expenses are reviewed and the annual costs are projected for the following fiscal year. District Budget Estimated 2011/12 Bud et Personnel Services Re ular Salaries $150,160.00 Part-time Salaries 7,860.00 Frin a Benefits 70 940.00 Subtotal Personnel $226,960.00 O erations and Maintenance O erations and Maintenance $24 550.00 Emer enc E ui ment and Vehicle Rental 1 200.00 Contract Services 229 260.00 Tree Maintenance 6,600.00 Utilities Water Utilities 25 990.00 Electric Utilities 8,730.00 Assessment Administration 8,750.00 General Overhead 54 320.00 Subtotal O erations and Maintenance $359,400.00 Ca ital Ex enditures Ca ital Pro ects 110 000.00 Subtotal Ca ital Ex enditures $110,000.00 Total District Ex enditure Bud et $698,360.00 Total Estimated Assessment $379,530.00 Plus Anticipated Delinquency Penalty 970.00 Total Estimated Revenue $380,500.00 Plus Reserve Fund Contribution 317 860.00 Total Expenditure Budget $698,360.00 Total Estimated Assessment $379,530.00 Total District EBU Count 2 029.56 Actual Assessment er EBU -Fiscal Year 2011/12 $187.00 Maximum Allowable Assessment er EBU -Fiscal Year 2011/12 $501.55 Each year, prior to the assessments being placed on the tax roll, the City will review the budget and determine the amount needed to maintain the improvements for the upcoming fiscal year. The actual assessment per EBU will be based on the estimated costs of maintenance, available fund balance and maximum allowable assessment with the goal of maintaining the improvements in a satisfactory Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2011/12 and healthy condition. The actual assessment amount may be lower than the maximum allowable assessment; however it may not exceed the maximum unless the increase is approved by the property owners in accordance with Proposition 21 B. It is the intent of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to maintain an Operating Reserve which shall not exceed the estimated costs of maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or when the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The reserve balance information for the District is as follows: Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2011 Reserve Fund Balance $2,673,240.00 Operating Reserve Contribution -Fiscal Year 2011/12 (317,860.00) Operating Reserve Collection -Fiscal Year 2011/12 970.00 Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2012 Reserve Fund Balance $2,356,350.00 Definitions of Budget Items The following definitions describe the costs and expenses included in the District Budget Personnel Services Regular Salaries: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all full-time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Part Time Salaries: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all part time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Fringe Benefits: This item includes the benefits available to City employees: health care, vacation, sick time, and retirement fund. Operations and Maintenance Contract Services: This item includes the contract costs of a landscape maintenance company responsible for the ongoing maintenance of the District improvements. Tree Maintenance: This item includes the contract costs attributed to maintaining the street trees and other trees throughout the District. Utilities -Water: This item includes the costs to furnish water for the landscaping within the District. Utilities -Electric: This item includes the costs to furnish electricity required for the operation and maintenance of the sprinklers and irrigation controllers. Assessment Administration: This item includes the cost to all particular departments and staff of the City, and consultants for providing the administration, coordination and management of District services, operations, and incidental expenses related to the District. This item also includes creation of an annual engineer's report, resolutions and placing the assessment amounts onto the County tax roll each year, along with responding to any public inquiries and future Proposition 218 balloting proceedings. General Overhead: This item includes the costs of all departments and staff of the City for providing the coordination of District services, inspections, annual bid management, responding to public concerns, public education, accounting, auditing and procedural matters associated with the District. This item also includes an allocation for general City staff time for administrative functions and Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2011/12 systems that provide for a functional and operational assessment district within the City's administrative structure. Capital Expenditures: Capital P~oiects: This item includes new improvements to further enhance the level and quality of service provided within the boundaries of the District. This may include new monuments, irrigation systems, and other large improvements. Operating Reserve Collection: Operating Reserve Collection: This item includes the amount to be collected to maintain reserves to enable the City to pay for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or whenever the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The Reserve Fund contribution will continue until such a time the Reserve Fund balance is approximately one half of the annual costs. The fund may be allowed to accumulate in anticipation of any unforeseen expenses not included in the yearly maintenance costs. This may include, but is not limited to, tree replacements, repair of damaged equipment due to vandalism, storms and other similar events. Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 10 Fiscal Year 2011/12 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT General Pursuant to the 1972 Act and Article XIII D, all parcels that have a special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements and services shall be identified, and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel shall be determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of improvements. The 1972 Act, permits the establishment of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include the operation, maintenance and servicing of landscaping improvements. Section 22573 of the 1972 Act requires that maintenance assessments must be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. This Section states: "The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district maybe apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements." The determination of whether or not a lot or parcel will benefit from the improvements shall be made pursuant to the Improvement Act of 1911 (Division 7 (commencing with Section 5000) (of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California)." The 1972 Act also permits the designation of zones of benefit within any individual assessment district if "by reasons or variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive different degrees of benefit from the improvement" (Sec. 22547). Article XIII D, Section 4(a) of the California Constitution limits the amount of any assessment to the proportional special benefit conferred on the property. Article XIII D also provides that publicly owned properties must be assessed unless there is clear and convincing evidence that those properties receive no special benefit from the assessment. Exempted from the assessment would be the areas of public streets, public avenues, public lanes, public roads, public drives, public courts, public alleys, public easements and rights-of-ways, public greenbelts and public parkways. The net amount to be assessed may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels. Proposition 218, approved by the voters in November 1996, requires the City to separate general benefit from special benefit, where only special benefit is assessed. Benefit The maintenance and servicing of the improvements within the District (which are described in the Description of Improvements and Services Section of this report) are for the benefit of the properties within the District, and as such confer a special and direct benefit to parcels within the District by: improving the livability, appearance, and desirability for properties within the boundaries of the District, and ensuring that improvements do not reach a state of deterioration or disrepair so as to be materially detrimental to properties within the District, and Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 11 Fiscal Year 2011/12 providing beautification, shade and overall enhancement to properties within the District. The above mentioned items affect the assessed property in a way that is particular and distinct from their effect on other parcels and that real property in general and the public at large do not share. They contribute to a specific enhancement of the properties within the District. Since these improvements, including the community trails, were installed and are maintained specifically for the properties within the District; only properties within the District receive a special benefit and are assessed for said maintenance. General Benefit In addition to the special benefits received by parcels within the District, there are derivative general benefits that are conferred on parcels outside the boundaries of the District which include: • the control of dust and insect infestations, and • the visual enhancement of the area to persons or vehicles that may travel through the District. However it has been determined that these benefits are derivative and do not provide a direct benefit to parcels outside of the district that are not being assessed. Method of Assessment Each of the parcels within the District is deemed to receive special benefit from the improvements. Each parcel that has a special benefit conferred upon it as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements are identified and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel is determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of the improvements. To assess special benefit appropriately, it is necessary to relate the different type of parcel improvements to each other. The Equivalent Benefit Unit ("EBU") method of apportionment uses the single family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single family home equals one Equivalent Benefit Unit (EBU). Every other land-use is converted to EBUs based on an assessment formula that equates to the property's specific development status, type of development (land-use), and size of the property, as compared to a single family home. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land-use types, as assigned by County use code, to determine each parcel's EBU assignment. Land-Use Equivalent Dwelling Units Pro e T e Coun Use Code EBU Value Multi tier Single Family Residential 1.00 Dwelling Unit Multi-Family Residential 1.00 Dwelling Unit Non-Residential Improved 2.00 Acre Vacant Property 0.25 Acre The use of the latest County Assessor's Secured Roll shall be the basis for the Property Type determination and units/acreage assignments, unless better data is available to the City. In addition, if any parcel within the District is identified by the County Auditor/Controller to be an invalid parcel number for the current fiscal year, the Property Type and EBU assignment shall be based on the Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 12 Fiscal Year 2011/12 correct parcel number and/or new parcel number(s) County use code and subsequent property information. If a single parcel has changed to multiple parcels, the EBU assignment and assessment amount applied to each of the new parcels will be recalculated rather than spread the proportionate share of the original assessment. The following table summarizes the Fiscal Year 2011/12 maximum allowable assessment rates for the District: Property Type (County Use Code) Maximum Allowable Assessment Rate er EBU Actual Assessment Rate er EBU Total Units/Acres Total EBUs Single Family Residential $496.55 $187.00 936.00 936.00 Multi-Family Residential 496.55 $187.00 1,057.00 1,057.00 Non-Residentiallmproved 496.55 $187.00 18.28 36.56 Vacant Property 496.55 $187.00 0.00 0.00 The total amount of maintenance and incidental costs for maintaining the landscaping and community trail improvements is assessed to the individual parcels of real property within the District in proportion to the special benefit received by such parcels of real property. The proposed individual assessments are shown on the assessment roll in this report. Maximum and Historical Assessments The maximum allowable assessment per EBU listed in the District budget above, is the amount which was approved in 2000/01, when the District was formed, and subsequent District annexations. Commencing in Fiscal Year 2001/02, the amount of the maximum allowable assessment is proposed to increase each year based upon the Consumer Price Index ("CPI"), All Urban Consumers, for the Los Angeles-Anaheim-San Bernardino Area, as determined by the United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics or its successor. Each year the percentage difference between the CPI for March of each year and the CPI for the previous March shall be computed. The assessment shall be adjusted by an amount not to exceed such percentage for the fallowing fiscal year. Should the Bureau of Labor Statistics revise such index or discontinue preparation of such index, the revised index or a comparable system as approved by the City Council shall be used for determining fluctuations in the cost of living. Historical maximum assessment amounts and actual assessment amounts are shown in the table below: Fiscal Year Maximum Assessment er EBU Actual Assessment er EBU 2000/01 $375.91 $375.91 2001/02 388.02 375.91 2002/03 398.81 375.91 2003/04 414.44 375.91 2004/05 421.71 375.91 2005/06 438.67 375.91 2006/07 459.15 375.91 2007/08 476.76 387.94 2008/09 492.41 387.94 2009/10 487.50 387.94 2011 /12 496.55 187.00 Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 13 Fiscal Year 2011/12 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM An Assessment Diagram for the District is shown on the following page. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the County Assessor of the County San Bernardino, at the time this report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Engineer's Report. Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 14 Fiscal Year 2011/12 vs v 'i w O ~~ •~ Q V a J ny ua~lll!W ny uaneH ny esow~aH nH PIe9!4o~t/ ny uewllaH 1S uellawe~ c 0 ._.. ny epuenn!;3 B ~aai~ lea ny ~a;sayooa . _ ~ C N ~ ~ C N f0 [~ of V~ Z£ U - ny ti~a4~ d C _ J m ~ N N L N O m Q lL Q .~ J Q ~ U ~ ~ •-• 4 ~ J ti'r ny;se3 ~ ~N 0 0 oN N O L v ..I_.._.._. ~ ny epuennl;3 ny ~a;sayooa ~- -~ ny ua~!II!W - my uaneH - - inyesowiaH 1 -~ inV PIeQ!4o~V ~.~' ~ ny uewllaH /r•• L ! ny p~e~au!n .f ~ ~ c L J W N N (0 m . _..__~..~.-' ny anal OD ~ (~ L L p ap O Q U_ li g Cd! 0 ~ y" SS ¢~CCS E~EZ41 ASSESSMENT ROLL Assessment Roll The assessment roll is a listing of the assessment for Fiscal Year 2011/12 apportioned to each lot or parcel, as shown on the last equalized roll of the Assessor of the County of San Bernardino. The following tables summarize the Fiscal Year 2011/12 maximum and actual assessments for the District: Property Type (County Use Code Maximum Allowable Assessment Rate er EBU Total Units/Acres Total EBUs Maximum Allowable Assessment Single Family Residential $501.55 936.00 936.00 $469,450.80 Multi-Family Residential 501.55 1,057.00 1,057.00 530,138.35 Non-Residentiallmproved 501.55 18.28 36.56 18,336.67 Vacant Property 501.55 0.00 0.00 0.00 TOTALS 2,011.28 2,029.56 $1,017,925.82 Property Type (County Use Code Actual Assessment Rate er EBU Total Units/Acres Total EBUs Actual Assessment Single Family Residential $187.00 936.00 936.00 $175,032.00 Multi-Family Residential 187.00 1,057.00 1,057.00 197,659.00 Non-Residentiallmproved 187.00 18.28 36.56 6,836.72 Vacant Property 187.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 TOTALS 2,011.28 2,029.56 $379,527.72 A copy of the full assessment roll is available for review in the City Clerk's office. Annexations There were no annexations effective for the 2011112 Fiscal Year: Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 15 Fiscal Year 2011/12 Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2011/2012 City of Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 10 (Rancho Etiwanda) CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 10 (RANCHO ETIWANDA) 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Phone: 909.477.2740 Fax: 909.477.2741 CITY COUNCIL L. Dennis Michael, Mayor Sam Spagnolo, Mayor Pro Tem William Alexander, Council Member Chuck Buquet, Council Member Diane Williams, Council Member CITY STAFF John R. Gillison, Assistant City Manager Linda D. Daniels, Deputy City Manager William Wittkopf, Public Works Director Ingrid Y. Bruce, GIS/Special Districts Manager Christopher Bopko, Management Analyst III TABLE OF CONTENTS ENGINEER'S LETTER INTRODUCTION 1 3 Reason for Assessment .............................................................................................3 Process for Annual Assessment .................................................................................3 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS 4] Description of the Boundaries of the District ...............................................................5 Description of Improvements and Services ................................................................5 Map of Improvements .................................................................................................7 ESTIMATE OF COSTS 8 District Budget ............................................................................................................8 Definitions of Budget Items .........................................................................................9 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT 11 General ................................................................................... ..................................11 Special Benefit ....................................................................... ..................................11 General Benefit ...................................................................... ..................................12 Method of Assessment Spread .............................................. ..................................12 Maximum and Historical Assessments ................................... ..................................13 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM ASSESSMENT ROLL 14 15 Assessment Roll .......................................................................................................15 Annexations ..............................................................................................................15 ENGINEER'S LETTER WHEREAS, on July 6"', 2011, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 (the "1972 Act") adopted its Resolution No. 11-098, a Resolution Initiating Proceedings for the Levy of Annual Assessments for Landscape Maintenance District No. 10 (Rancho Etiwanda) (the "District"); and WHEREAS, the Resolution Initiating Proceedings directed NBS to prepare and file an Engineer's Report for Fiscal Year 2011/12 pursuant to the requirements of the 1972 Act. The Engineer's Report presents the plans and specifications describing the general nature, location and extent of the improvements to be maintained, an estimate of the costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements for the District for the referenced fiscal year, a diagram for the District, showing the area and properties proposed to be assessed, and an assessment of the estimated costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing the improvements, assessing the net amount upon all assessable lots andlor parcels within the District in proportion to the special benefit received; and NOW THEREFORE, the following assessment is proposed to be authorized in order to pay the estimated costs of maintenance, operation and servicing of the improvements to be paid by the assessable real property within the boundaries of the District in proportion to the special benefit received. The following table summarizes the proposed assessment. SUMMARY OF ASSESSMENT Fiscal Year 2011/12 Total Estimated Assessment $462,770.00 Less Anticipated Delinquencies 29 020.00 Total Estimated Revenue $433,750.00 Plus Reserve Fund Contribution 114 170.00 Total Expenditure Budget $547,920.00 Total District EBU Count 751.00 Actual Assessment per EBU $616.20 Maximum Allowable Assessment per EBU $771.79 In making the assessments contained herein pursuant to the 1972 Act: I have identified all parcels which will have a special benefit conferred upon them from the improvements described in the Special Benefit Section of this Engineer's Report (the "Specially Benefited Parcels"). For particulars as to the identification of said parcels, reference is made to the Assessment Diagram, a copy of which is included in this Engineer's Report. 2. I have evaluated the costs and expenses of the improvements upon the Specially Benefited Parcels. In making such evaluation: a. The proportionate special benefit derived by each Specially Benefited Parcel from the improvements was determined in relationship to the entirety of the maintenance costs of the improvements; Landscape Maintenance District No. 10 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2011/12 b. No assessment has been imposed on any Specially Benefited Parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on such parcel from the improvements; and c. Any general benefits from the improvements have been separated from the special benefits and only special benefits have been assessed. I, the undersigned, respectfully submit the enclosed Engineer's Report and, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, the Engineer's Report, Assessments, and the Assessment Diagram herein have been prepared and computed in accordance with the order of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the 1972 Act, Article XIII D of the Constitution of the State of California ("Article XIII D") and the Proposition 218 Omnibus Implementation Act ("Proposition 218"), (the 1972 Act, Article XIII D and Proposition 218 are collectively referred to as the "Assessment Law"). A. Steuer ctor of Engineering Services/City Engineer Landscape Maintenance District No. 10 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2011/12 INTRODUCTION Reason for Assessment Approval of the assessment covered by this Engineer's Report will generate the revenue necessary ta: Provide for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements described in this Engineer's Report. Maintenance may include but is not limited to, all of the following: the repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement, providing for the life, growth, health and beauty of the landscaping, including cultivation, irrigation, trimming, spraying, fertilizing or treating for disease or injury, the removal of trimming, rubbish, debris and other solid waste, the maintenance, repair and replacement as necessary of all irrigation systems and the removal of graffiti from walls immediately adjacent to the cultivated areas. Servicing means the furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operating and servicing of any improvement. Servicing shall also include vehicle, equipment, capital improvements and administrative costs associated with the annual administration and operation of the District. Process for Annual Assessment The City cannot levy and collect annual assessments within the District without complying with the procedures specified in the 1972 Act. On an annual basis, an Engineer's Report must be prepared which contains a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the district. The City Council must also adopt a resolution of intention which: • Declares the intention of the City Council to levy and collect assessments within the assessment district for the fiscal year stated therein. • Generally describes the existing and proposed improvements and any substantial changes proposed to be made in existing improvements. • Refers to the assessment district by its distinctive designation and indicate the general location of the district. • Refers to the report of the engineer, on file with the clerk, for a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the district. • Gives notice of the time and place for public hearing by the City Council on the levy of the proposed assessment. • States whether the assessment is proposed to increase from the previous year. If the assessments are to be levied in the same or lesser amounts than the maximum assessment amount approved, the clerk shall give notice by causing the resolution of intention to be published. Any interested person may, prior to the conclusion of the hearing, file a written protest which shall state all grounds of objection. The protest shall contain a description sufficient to identify the property owned by the property owner filing the protest. During the course or upon conclusion of the public hearing, the City Council may order changes in any of the matters provided in the report, including changes in the improvements, any zones within the assessment district, and the proposed diagram or the proposed assessment. Landscape Maintenance District No. 10 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2011/12 The City Council, upon conclusion of the public hearing must then adopt a resolution confirming the diagram and assessment, either as originally proposed or as changed by it. The adoption of the resolution shall constitute the levy of an assessment for the fiscal year referred to in the assessment. If the assessment to be levied exceeds the maximum assessment amount previously approved, the City must comply with the procedures specified in Article XIII D and Proposition 218. The voters in the State of California in November 1996 added Article XIII D to the California Constitution imposing, among other requirements, the necessity for the City to conduct an assessment ballot procedure to enable the owners of each property on which assessments are proposed to be enacted or increased, the opportunity to express their support for, or opposition to the proposed assessment or increase in such assessment. The basic steps of the assessment ballot procedure are outlined below. The City must prepare a Notice of Public Hearing ("Notice"), which describes, along with other mandated information, the reason for the proposed assessments, and to provide a date and time of a public hearing to be held on the matter. The City must also prepare an assessment ballot, which clearly gives the property owner the ability to sign and mark their assessment ballot either in favor of, or in opposition to the proposed assessment. The Notice and assessment ballot are mailed to each affected property owner within the assessment district a minimum of 45 days prior to the public hearing date as shown in the Notice. The City may also hold community meetings with the property owners to discuss the issues facing the district and to answer property owner questions directly. After the Notice and assessment ballot are mailed, property owners are given until the close of the public hearing, stated in the Notice, to return their signed and marked assessment ballot. During the public hearing, property owners are given the opportunity to address the City Council and ask questions or voice their concerns. At the public hearing, the returned assessment ballots received prior to the close of the public hearing are tabulated, weighted by the proposed assessment amount on each property and the results are announced by the City Council. Article XIII D provides that if, as a result of the assessment ballot proceeding, a majority protest is found to exist, the City Council shall not have the authority to levy and collect the assessments as proposed. A majority protest exists if the assessments represented by ballots submitted in opposition exceed those submitted in favor of the assessment. All returned ballots are tabulated and weighted according to the financial obligation of each particular parcel. If there is no majority protest as described above, the City Council may approve the proposed assessments. If there is a majority protest, as described above, the City will not levy and collect any assessments. Landscape Maintenance District No. 10 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 4 Fiscal Year 2011/12 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS The District provides for the administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing of various improvements located within the public right-of-way and dedicated easements within the boundaries of the District. Description of the Boundaries of the District The District is located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California. The boundaries of the District are generally described as that area known as Rancho Etiwanda, which lies north of Highway 210, east of Day Creek Channel, and west of Hanley Avenue. Typically parcels have been annexed to the District as they have developed. Reference is also made to the Assessment Diagram included in this Report. Description of Improvements and Services The improvements are the maintenance and servicing of landscaping sites and appurtenant facilities throughout the District. The various landscaping sites that are maintained consist of parkways, median islands, street trees, paseos and community trails located within street right-of-ways and dedicated public easements which are within the boundaries of the District. The landscaping maintenance includes, but is not limited to, shrubs, turf, tree trimming in irrigated City parkways and paseos, weed and pest control, landscape irrigation systems and testing, trash, debris and graffiti removal, and associated appurtenant facilities. Services include personnel, materials, contracting services, utilities, and all necessary costs associated with the maintenance, replacement and repair required to keep the improvements in a healthy, vigorous and satisfactory condition. In addition, it is the City's intention to continue to use cost effective materials, including the future ability to replace landscaping with drought resistant or low water use plants, in order to lower expenses of the District. The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows: Parks: Day Creek Park. Site # Descriptive Location 10-1 The west side of Day Creek from 790 feet north of Richfield to Wilson. The north side of Wilson from Day Creek to 227 feet west of Day Creek. This site overlaps 10-2. Ground Cover area: 16,941 square feet Hardscaoe area: 3,589 square feet 10-2 The north and south side of Wilson from 497 feet west of Alvarado to Day Creek with 1 station at top of highest retaining wall on corner of Wilson and Day Creek. This station overlaps site 10-1. The south side of Wilson from Day Creek to Bluegrass. The Wilson median from Day Creek to Bluegrass. Ground Cover area: 47,275 square feet Hardscaoe area: 6,444 square feet 10-3 The west side of Day Creek from Wilson to 144 feet south of Clydesdale. The Day Creek median from Wilson to Banyan. Ground Cover area: 32,619 square feet Hardscaoe area: 10,983 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 10 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2011/12 10-4 The east side of Day Creek from 648 feet south of Keenland to Wilson. Ground Cover area: 15,952 square feet Hardscaoe area: 4,365 square feet 10-5 The west side of Bluegrass from Wilson to 705 feet south of Challendon. Ground Cover area: 26,882 square feet Hardscaoe area: 12,220 square feet 10-6 The south side of Banyan from Rochester to Day Creek. The north side of Banyan from 427 feet west of Rocking Horse to Rocking Horse. The west side of Day Creek from Banyan to Vintage. The Day Creek median from Banyan to Vintage. The north side of Vintage from Day Creek to paseo ending 153 feet west of Sand Hill. Ground Cover area: 44,000 square feet Hardscaoe area: 16,197 square feet 10-7 The north side of Vintage from 180 feet east of Taylor Canyon Place to Day Creek. The east side of Day Creek from Vintage to Banyan. The south side of Banyan from Day Creek to Bluegrass. Ground Cover area: 22,164 square feet Hardscaoe area: 11,724 square feet 10-8 The landscape against the south side facing wall north of the 210 freeway from the top of the slope on the east side of Day Creek to 300 feet eastward. The Day Creek median from the 210 freeway to Vintage. The east side of Day Creek from Caltrans ROW to Vintage. The south side of Vintage from Day Creek to 180 feet east of Taylor Canyon. Ground Cover area: 16,841 square feet Hardscaoe area: 7,025 square feet 10-9 The north side of Coyote from Brookstone Place to Day Creek. The east side of Day Creek from Coyote to 358 feet north of Coyote. The west side of Day Creek from 118 feet north of Coyote to 380 feet north of Coyote. Ground cover area: 9,403 square feet Hardscage area: 6,052 square feet *This site previously had 8,488 square feet of ground cover and 5,752 of Hardscage prior to the addition of the area on the west side of Day Creek 10-10 The north side of Wilson from 395 feet east of Day Creek to Day Creek. The eastside of Day Creek from Wilson to Blackstone. The south side of Blackstone from Day Creek to Stoneview. The north side of Blackstone from Day Creek to 165 feet west of Stoneview. Ground cover area: 26,304 square feet Hardscage area: 19,117 square feet 10-11 The west side of Day Creek from 340 feet north of Banyan to Banyan. The north side of Banyan from Day Creek to Rocking Horse. Ground cover area: 20,378 square feet Hardscage area: 11,212 square feet 10-12 The paseo on the east side of Stoneview Rd. across from Duncaster PI. Ground cover area: 3,326 square feet Hardscage area: 2,374 square feet Ground cover, shrubs and turt areas that make up parkways, median islands and paseos are maintained under contract by a private landscape maintenance company. Parks are maintained by the City's Park Maintenance Crews. Landscape Maintenance District No. 10 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2011/12 Map of Improvements The following page shows the map of landscaping improvements, including irrigation sites and community trails, to be maintained using District funds. Landscape Maintenance District No. 10 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2011112 --i - ~ ~~ N __. -- i i i i ,. , .. ~ f~_, ~_ -: ~1 I i --- ~ ~ '( ~ ~~' j f - -1 ~- i r ~ ,, ~ ti5~- r ~; ~l~ll'1~o-y ~~ - ~~, _i C1 L1 11L ~ 1 f ~ I I , n._ ~ ~'.,... ,.,...... /'' rr r r ITf -f'r (~fll 1~Trrr n-t ~~ 1 J l a3 "~ ~~o±~ ~-[ ~ t ~. ~p 1~5 , ~J-111 ~J~'-~l~ u ~? i~uii 111J1~~1.111r1 r~111 ~i!i}1!`jj~, ~1~~111~' r ~ 1 rr- T- ~j , 1 f.: r,fai,~~1~~ ~~~~4~1T~~~1~ -=]~-~1 ~ -- ~ffillll~l, m Y l,l'111;ii W - `- r: 1-yG1T r~rrt~ r' r l ~ '~ .) l l ' ; l 1 ' L i l / . i ~1J; 1 , 0:8 } ~ Q WATER METER ~ ~ I1 k ~ , ^O IRRIGATION PUMP IT ~il l l -•••-• PE TRAIL ~ ! ~' IRRIGATION LINE I l ~~ -PARKS I i\ iiJa h --- LMD 10 BOUNDARY l ~ ~~' I 11 MAJOR STREET ~ ' I-r~210~NRP FREEWAY 121.OaOF.RP~ PARCELS r i ~` ~'-1 ri ~: Llll ..l l .l ' __~~ r r _~t~~~-~r~- -1~~-_ ~~111~~ ~- i 1 !lI1rr_[?t~ ~_ - _ ~ - ~f i~~_ ~` \~ \ _Zi~r1rL1~ _ _~;.. `~ ~ ~ \~ r~ Y1i~J~ 11~~11 ITS l; 5211 ;~ _ ~~ 't L=~- -~ ~ _ _~-~ I i,-~ ~,~i1TI r illliirllj`~ ,:1.1,1 ~, , Landscape Maintenance District No. 10 uu•wm me W •uv •~. ummm~. n memi.a. m .uv mrommmu wu•mea.mror M.m.amu or mw~ou orcwNp due m am w~.a. n1•na upon m• mfommtl•n mWEm MMn. ESTIMATE OF COSTS The estimated costs of administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing the improvements as described in the Plans and Specifications are summarized below. Each year, as part of the assessment district levy calculation process, the costs and expenses are reviewed and the annual costs are projected far the following fiscal year. District Estimated 2011/12 Budget Personnel Services Regular Salaries $159,070.00 Overtime Salaries 1,050.00 Part-time Salades 27,590.00 Fringe Benefits 77.790.00 Subtotal Personnel $265,500.00 Operations and Maintenance Operations and Maintenance $26,500.00 Operations and Maintenance/Facilities 4,000.00 Emergency Equipment and Vehicle Rental 1,000.00 Equipment Operations and Maintenance 1,000.00 Contract Services 123,300.00 Contract Services/Facilities 2,000.00 Tree Maintenance 6,860.00 Utilities Water Utilities 72,000.00 Electric Utilities 50,400.00 Assessment Administration 4,130.00 General Overhead 31.410.00 Subtotal Operations and Maintenance $322,600.00 Capital Expenditures Capital Projects $30.000.00 Subtotal Capital Expenditures $30,000.00 Total District Expenditure Budget ~ $818,100.00 Total Estimated Assessment $462,770.00 Less Anticipated Delinquencies (29.020.00) Total Estimated Revenue $433,750.00 Plus Operating Reserve Fund Contribution 114.170.00 Total Expenditun: Budget $547,920.00 Total Estimated Assessment $462,770.00 Total District EBU Count 751.00 Actual Assessment per EBU -Fiscal Year 2011/12 $616.20 Maximum Allowable Assessment er EBU -Fiscal Year 2011/12 $771.79 Landscape Maintenance District No. 10 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 8 Fiscal Year 2011/12 Each year, prior to the assessments being placed on the tax roll, the City will review the budget and determine the amount needed to maintain the improvements for the upcoming fiscal year. The actual assessment per EBU will be based on the estimated costs of maintenance, available fund balance and maximum allowable assessment with the goal of maintaining the improvements in a satisfactory and healthy condition. The actual assessment amount may be lower than the maximum allowable assessment; however it may not exceed the maximum unless the increase is approved by the property owners in accordance with Proposition 218. It is the intent of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to maintain an Operating Reserve which shall not exceed the estimated costs of maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or when the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The reserve balance information for the District is as follows: Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2011 Reserve Fund Balance $1,068,250.00 Operating Reserve Contribution -Fiscal Year 2011/12 (114,170.00) Ooeratina Reserve Collection -Fiscal Year 2011/12 0.00 Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2012 Reserve Fund Balance $954,080.00 Definitions of Budget Items The following definitions describe the costs and expenses included in the District Budget Personnel Services Reoular Salaries: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all full-time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Part Time Salaries: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all part time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Fringe Benefits: This item includes the benefits available to City employees: health care, vacation, sick time, and retirement fund. Operations and Maintenance Contract Services: This item includes the contract costs of a landscape maintenance company responsible for the ongoing maintenance of the District improvements. Tree Maintenance: This item includes the contract costs attributed to maintaining the street trees and other trees throughout the District. Utilities -Water: This item includes the costs to furnish water for the landscaping within the District. Utilities -Electric: This item includes the costs to furnish electricity required for the operation and maintenance of the sprinklers and irrigation controllers. Assessment Administration: This item includes the cost to all particular departments and staff of the City, and consultants for providing the administration, coordination and management of District services, operations, and incidental expenses related to the District. This item also includes creation of an annual engineer's report, resolutions and placing the assessment amounts onto the County tax roll each year, along with responding to any public inquiries and future Proposition 218 balloting proceedings. Landscape Maintenance District No. 10 -City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2011112 . General Overhead: This item includes the costs of all departments and staff of the City for providing the coordination of District services, inspections, annual bid management, responding to public concerns, public education, accounting, auditing and procedural matters associated with the District. This item also includes an allocation for general City staff time for administrative functions and systems that provide for a functional and operational assessment district within the City's administrative structure. Capital Expenditures: Capital Projects: This item includes new improvements to further enhance the level and quality of service provided within the boundaries of the District. This may include new monuments, irrigation systems, and other large improvements. Operating Reserve Collection: Operating Reserve Collection: This item includes the amount to be collected to maintain reserves to enable the City to pay for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or whenever the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The Reserve Fund contribution will continue until such a time the Reserve Fund balance is approximately one half of the annual costs. The fund may be allowed to accumulate in anticipation of any unforeseen expenses not included in the yearly maintenance costs. This may include, but is not limited to, tree replacements, repair of damaged equipment due to vandalism, storms and other similar events. Landscape Maintenance District No. 10 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 10 Fiscal Year 2011/12 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT General Pursuant to the 1972 Act and Article XIII D, all parcels that have a special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements and services shall be identified, and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel shall be determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of improvements. The 1972 Act, permits the establishment of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include the operation, maintenance and servicing of landscaping improvements. Section 22573 of the 1972 Act requires that maintenance assessments must be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. This Section states: "The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district maybe apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements." The determination of whether or not a lot or parcel will benefit from the improvements shall be made pursuant to the Improvement Act of 1911 (Division 7 (commencing with Section 5000) (of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California]." The 1972 Act also permits the designation of zones of benefit within any individual assessment district if "by reasons or variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive different degrees of benefit from the improvement" (Sec. 22547). Article XIII D, Section 4(a) of the California Constitution limits the amount of any assessment to the proportional special benefit conferred on the property. Article XIII D also provides that publicly owned properties must be assessed unless there is clear and convincing evidence that those properties receive no special benefit from the assessment. Exempted from the assessment would be the areas of public streets, public avenues, public lanes, public roads, public drives, public courts, public alleys, public easements and rights-of-ways, public greenbelts and public parkways. The net amount to be assessed may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels. Proposition 218, approved by the voters in November 1996, requires the City to separate general benefit from special benefit, where only special benefit is assessed. Special Benefit The maintenance and servicing of the improvements within the District (which are described in the Description of Improvements and Services Section of this report) are for the benefit of the properties within the District, and as such confer a special and direct benefit to parcels within the District by: • improving the livability, appearance, and desirability for properties within the boundaries of the District, and • ensuring that improvements do not reach a state of deterioration or disrepair so as to be materially detrimental to properties within the District, and Landscape Maintenance District No. 10 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 11 Fiscal Year 2011/12 • providing beautification, shade and overall enhancement to properties within the District. The above mentioned items affect the assessed property in a way that is particular and distinct from their effect on other parcels and that real property in general and the public at large do not share. They contribute to a specific enhancement of the properties within the District. Since these improvements, including the community trails, were installed and are maintained specifically for the properties within the District; only properties within the District receive a special benefit and are assessed for said maintenance. General Benefit In addition to the special benefits received by parcels within the District, there are derivative general benefits that are conferred on parcels outside the boundaries of the District which include: • the control of dust and insect infestations, and • the visual enhancement of the area to persons or vehicles that may travel through the District. However it has been determined that these benefits are derivative and do not provide a direct benefit to parcels outside of the district that are not being assessed. Method of Assessment Each of the parcels within the District is deemed to receive special benefit from the improvements. Each parcel that has a special benefit conferred upon it as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements are identified and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel is determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of the improvements. To assess special benefit appropriately, it is necessary to relate the different type of parcel improvements to each other. The Equivalent Benefit Unit ("EBU") method of apportionment uses the single family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single family home equals one Equivalent Benefit Unit (EBU). Every other land-use is converted to EBUs based on an assessment formula that equates to the property's specific development status, type of development (land-use), and size of the property, as compared to a single family home. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land-use types, as assigned by County use code, to determine each parcel's EBU assignment. Land-Use Equivalent Dwelling Units Pro e T e Coun Use Code EBU Value Multi tier Single Family Residential 1.00 Dwelling Unit The use of the latest County Assessor's Secured Roll shall be the basis for the Property Type determination and units/acreage assignments, unless better data is available to the City. In addition, if any parcel within the District is identified by the County Auditor/Controller to be an invalid parcel number for the current fiscal year, the Property Type and EBU assignment shall be based on the correct parcel number and/or new parcel number(s) County use code and subsequent property information. If a single parcel has changed to multiple parcels, the EBU assignment and assessment amount applied to each of the new parcels will be recalculated rather than spread the proportionate share of the original assessment. Landscape Maintenance District No. 10 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 12 Fiscal Year 2011/12 The following table summarizes the Fiscal Year 2011/12 maximum allowable assessment rates for the District: Maximum Allowable Property Type Assessment Rate Actual Assessment Total Total (County Use Code) er EBU Rate per EBU Units/Acres EBUs Single Family Residential $771.79 $616.20 751 751 The total amount of maintenance and incidental costs for maintaining the landscaping and community trail improvements is assessed to the individual parcels of real property within the District in proportion to the special benefit received by such parcels of real property. The proposed individual assessments are shown on the assessment roll in this report. Maximum and Historical Assessments The maximum allowable assessment rate per EBU listed above, is the amount which was approved in 2001/02, when the District was formed, and subsequent District annexations. Commencing in Fiscal Year 2002/03, the amount of the maximum allowable assessment is proposed to increase each year based upon the Consumer Price Index ("CPI"), All Urban Consumers, for the Los Angeles- Anaheim-San Bernardino Area, as determined by the United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics or its successor. Each year the percentage difference between the CPI far March of each year and the CPI for the previous March shall be computed. The assessment shall be adjusted by an amount not to exceed such percentage for the following fiscal year. Should the Bureau of Labor Statistics revise such index or discontinue preparation of such index, the revised index or a comparable system as approved by the City Council shall be used for determining fluctuations in the cost of living. Historical maximum assessment amounts and actual assessment amounts are shown in the table below: Fiscal Year Maximum Assessment er EBU Actual Assessment er EBU 2001/02 $597.09 $597.09 2002/03 613.69 597.09 2003/04 637.75 597.09 2004/05 648.93 597.09 2005/06 675.03 597.09 2006/07 706.54 597.09 2007/08 733.65 616.20 2008/09 757.73 616.20 2009/10 757.73 616.20 2011/12 771.79 616.20 Landscape Maintenance District No. 10 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 13 Fiscal Year 2011/12 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM An Assessment Diagram for the District is shown on the following page. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the County Assessor of the County San Bernardino, at the time this report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Engineer's Report. Landscape Maintenance District No. 10 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 14 Fiscal Year 2011112 o ~ ~~ ~ N 'i; ~~ o ' a -o ?' ~ ® Q c ~ = (~ J 0 ~ ~ ny l~~ay~ ~ •-;~ 4 G1 ti r V ; .._.._.._.._ ~ J o ~ i ~, N C ~ J i J N m _ ~ O ~ 1 ~ t o 3 i m li ~ Q •~ 1 _.. ...w.....,....... i n`d lse3 in ~ ®1 ~ i ny epuenn!;3 ~ _.._.._.. ~ ny epuenn!33 Q ! - ~ e ~ i y ~8 >lae \_.._.. ~ ny is;sayooa - ~ ~ - - ny ~a;sayooa J ... ~ , i _ _ - .~ ny ua>I!II!W f._.._.._.._..- -- - --- ny ua>I!II!W i i i ny uaneH ~ --- i - ny uaneH i ~ ny esow~aH i- - - - - - - - i ny esowiaH ! ' ' ~ nb Pleq!4o~b - j nt1 PIeQ!4o~V i ny uewllaH i - - ~.~~" ~ ny uewllaH j N r ~•• L V i e ~ i iS uepawe~ ~ - --- _% - = ny p~ l au!~ .r i ~`Fgles ^.I:se ~ i t.._... -~ .• ~ a~€yi.F: i i < s '~.._.-•ti.._.._- - -'ny anal :s€s€1~~~3` • ./~ c 141 .[ee~xE r.._.._S_.._.. ..~..~. N O €54fr ~113 ` ~ ~ c m li ~ ge 1 e~$s 1H aF~_ 'O ~ = 55 s°al 5 ~E .N f0 g a£ %8g~~e'. ga~ m 2 11¢6°~~~€`i5i Ig21s ~x8 ~e~: sc ~ I~~agp p4ssa l ~ $6¢.s~ e¢~* z~ p ~ p ris a: ~4[&1 e g Er ASSESSMENT ROLL Assessment Roll The assessment roll is a listing of the assessment for Fiscal Year 2011/12 apportioned to each lot or parcel, as shown on the last equalized roll of the Assessor of the County of San Bernardino. The following tables summarize the Fiscal Year 2011/12 maximum and actual assessments for the District: Maximum Allowable Maximum Property Type Assessment Rate Total Total Allowable Count Use Code er EBU Units/Acres EBUs Assessment Single Family Residential $771.79 751.00 751.00 $579,614.29 Actual Property Type Assessment Rate Total Total Actual Coun Use Code er EBU Units/Acres EBUs Assessment Single Family Residential $616.20 751.00 751.00 $462,766.20 A copy of the full assessment roll is available for review in the City Clerk's office. Annexations There were no annexations effective for the 2011/12 Fiscal Year. Landscape Maintenance District No. 10 -City of Rancho Cucamonga 15 Fiscal Year 2011/12 DO NOT USE THIS STAFF REPORT. REFERENCE and USE information in the attached Staff Report following page P347. ~~s ~ ~/ STAFF REPORT `~ '~ ~~~~ r'~D~11IvISTR~"I'I~'F SER\'ICEti I~LP.IRTA4EI~T ~ RANCHO Date: August 3, 2011 CUCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager From: John R. Gillison, Assistant City Managef~-- .•• , By: Ingrid Y. Bruce, GIS/Special Districts Subject: CONSIDERATION TO APPROVE THE RESOLUTION CONFIRMING THE DIAGRAM AND ASSESSMENT, APPROVE THE ANNUAL ENGINEER'S REPORT, AND ORDER THE LEVY AND COLLECTION OF THE ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS WITHIN PARK AND RECREATION IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. PD-85 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2011/2012. NO INCREASE OF THE ASSESSMENT RATE IS PROPOSED. It is recommended that City Council approve the Resolution confirming the Diagram and Assessment, approve the Annual Engineer's Report, and order the levy and collection of the annual assessments within the Park and Recreation Improvement District No. PD-85. There is no increase to the current rate in this district proposed for Fiscal Year 2011/2012. The Engineer's Report is on file in the City Clerk's Office. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Each year, per the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972, the City is required to hold a public hearing to receive public comment on the levy and collection of assessments within Park and Recreation Improvement District No. PD-85. This requirement must be accomplished before the City can submit the annual assessments for placement on the County Tax Roll. The following, along with reference to the Engineer's Report for the Districts, identifies proposed Fiscal Year 2011/2012 assessment rates. The Engineer's Report identifies the required budget for the District, including the surplus, if any, remaining in the fund balance: Budgeted Expenses - $1,661,230.00 Estimated assessment revenues including delinquencies - $1,074,010.00 The deficit of $587,220.00 will be made up from operating reserves. This will bring the current operating reserve balance down to $868,950.00. At the current level of expenditures it will be necessary to bring the District for a Prop 218 Assessment Ballot process in Calendar Year 2013 or reduce expenses to stay within revenues. P334 P335 CONSIDIiRA'1'ION'1'O AI'I'RO\'G TFIG RISOI.U'I'ION I~OR PARK ANU IZI?CREATION In11'ROV I?MriNT DISTRICT' NO. PD-85 roR rlscAt. YrAR toll /?012. AUGUS'T' 3, 2011 Pncr. 2 Definition Single Family Residential Multi-Family Residential Less than 1.50 acres 1.51 acres to 3.50 acres 3.51 acres to 7.00 acres 7.01 acres to 14.00 acres 14.01 acres to 25.00 acres 25.01 acres and larger Assessment oer Parcel $31.00 $31.00 $15.50 $46.50 $108.50 $217.00 $434.00 $775.00 Attachments Resolution Engineer's Report P336 RESOLUTION NO. ~~ i3S A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONFIRMING THE DIAGRAM AND ASSESSMENT, APPROVING THE ANNUAL ENGINEER'S REPORT AND PROVIDING FOR THE LEVY AND COLLECTION OF ASSESSMENTS WITHIN PARK AND RECREATION IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. PD-85 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2011/2012 PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga did on the 6th day of July, 2011, adopt its Resolution of Intention No.11-101 pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, as amended (the "1972 Act"), declaring its intention to levy and collect assessments within Park and Recreation Improvement District No. PD-85 for Fiscal Year 2011/2012 and giving notice of the time and place for a public hearing by the City Council on the levy of the proposed assessments within the Districts; and WHEREAS, the City Council previously received and preliminarily approved a report of the Assessment Engineer as required by the 1972 Act; and WHEREAS, notice of such public hearing was duly and legally published in the time, form and manner as required by law, shown by the affidavit of Publication of said Resolution of Intention on file in the Office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, said City Council having duly received and considered evidence, oral and documentary, concerning the jurisdiction facts in this proceeding and concerning the necessity for the contemplated work and the benefits to be derived therefrom, and said City Council having now acquired jurisdiction to order the proposed work. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, DETERMINED AND ORDERED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, as follows: SECTION 1: This City Council hereby finds and determines that notice of the public hearing has been given and the proceedings for the consideration of the levy of the annual assessments within each District have been undertaken in accordance with the 1972 Act. SECTION 2: The final assessments and diagram for the proceedings, as contained in the final Engineer's Report for the District, are hereby approved and confirmed. The assessments for the District contained in the Engineer's Report for Fiscal Year.2011/2012 are hereby confirmed and levied upon the respective lots or parcels in the District in the amounts as set forth in applicable Engineer's Report. SECTION 3: This City Council finds and determines that the public interest and convenience requires the levy and collection of assessments within the District for the Fiscal Year 2011/2012, and said City Council hereby orders that the work, as set forth and described in said Resolution of Intention No. 11-101, be done and made. P337 SECTION 4: The above-referenced diagram and assessment shall be filed in the Office of the City Clerk. Said diagram and assessment, and the certified copy thereof, shall be open for public inspection. SECTION 5: The City Clerk is hereby ordered and directed to immediately file a certified copy of the diagram and assessment with the County Auditor. Said filing to be made no later than the 3rd Monday in August. SECTION 6: After the filing of the diagram and assessment, the County Auditor shall enter on the County assessment roll opposite each lot or parcel of land the amount assessed thereupon, as shown in the assessment. SECTION 7: The assessments shall be collected at the same time and in the same manner as County taxes are collected, and all laws providing for the collection and enforcement of County taxes shall apply to the collection and enforcement of the assessments. SECTION 8: The assessments as above confirmed and levied for these proceedings will provide revenue and relate to the fiscal year commencing July 1, 2011 and ending June 30, 2012. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of August, 2011. L. Dennis Michael, Mayor ATTEST: Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk I, Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of said City Council held on 2011. Executed this , at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk P338 Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2011/2012 City of Rancho Cucamonga PARKS AND RECREATION IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. PD-85 Approved: - Mark A. Steuer, Director Engineering Services/City Engineer P339 TABLE OF CONTENTS Authority for Report ...............................................................:.............. 3 Findings .............................................................................. 3 District Analysis ....:......................................................................... 4 Estimate of Work ..............................................................................4 Method of Spy°ead .................................................................................... 6 Calendar Year Annexations ........................................................... 8 Boundary Map ..............................................................................9 2 P340 City of Rancho Cucamonga Annual Report PD-85 Fiscal Year 2011/2012 AUTHORITY FOR REPORT This report for the 2011/2012 fiscal year is prepared pursuant to the order of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972, being Division 15, Section 22500 of the Streets and Highways code. Provisions for this annual assessment are included in Chapter 3 of the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972. The purpose of this report is to set forth findings and the assessment analysis for the annual levy of assessments for the Park and Recreation Improvement District No. PD-85 thereafter referred to as "the District". This District, using direct benefit assessments, was originally created to provide funds to finance the cost of construction, maintenance, operation and debt payment of Heritage Community Park and Red I-Iill Community Park in the Cit)~ of Rancho Cucamonga. Subsequently the debt has been repaid with only the ongoing maintenance and operation with periodic capital improvement expenditures of the parks remaining. FINDINGS Section 22573, Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972, requires assessments to be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. The section states: "The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements." The means of determining whether or not a parcel will benefit from the improvements is contained in the Improvement Act of 1911 (Division 7, commencing with Section 5000 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California). The 1972 Act also provides for the classification of various areas within an assessment district into benefit areas where, by reason ofvariations in the nature, location, and extent ofthe improvements, the various areas will receive differing degrees of all territory receiving substantially the same degree of benefit from the improvements and may consist of contiguous or noncontiguous areas. As the assessments are levied on the basis of benefit, they are considered a user's fee, not a tax; and, therefore, are not governed by Article XIIIA. Properties owned by public agencies, such as a city, county, state, or the federal governments is not assessable without the approval of the particular agency and, normally, are not assessed. Certain other parcels used for railroad mainline right-of--way, public 3 P341 utility transmission right-of--way, and common areas. are also exempt from assessment. The assessment for mobile home parks will be based upon underlying lot acreage. DISTRICT ANALYSIS A. District Boundary The district includes all of the City of Rancho Cucamonga with the general exception of land east of Deer Creek Channel and the Victoria, Caryn & Terra Vista Planned Communities. All parcels of real property affected are more particularly described in maps prepared in accordance with Section 327 of the Revenue and Taxation Code, which are on file in the office of the San Bernardino County Assessor in the Hall of Records, 172 West Third Street, San Bernardino, California and which are hereby made a part hereof by reference. B. District Name City of Rancho Cucamonga Park and Recreation Improvement District No. PD - 85. C. Facilities The existing works within the District boundary are generally described as follows: ]. The maintenance and operation of Heritage Community Park including, but not limited to, grading, planting, irrigation, onsite roads, sidewalks, parking lots, lighting, restrooms, equestrian facilities, playground equipment, picnic facilities, athletic facilities, and walking, jogging and equestrian trails and sanitary sewer connections. 2. The maintenance and operation of Red Hill Community Park including, but not limited to, grading, planting, irrigation, onsite roads, sidewalks, parking lots, lighting, waterscape, restrooms, senior citizen facilities, playground equipment, picnic facilities, major lighted athletic facilities, jogging trail, sanitary sewer connections and onsite drainage inlets. D. The assessment rate for the 2011/2012 FY is $31.00. No increase to this assessment rate is proposed. It is estimated that this assessment rate will cover the district's maintenance and operation expenses for the 2011/2012 FY. 4 P342 ESTIMATE OF WORK The Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 permits carrying forward surpluses or recovering deficits in subsequent fiscal years. Costs for the district will be reviewed annually. Any surplus credited against assessment or any deficits shall be included in the assessment for the following fiscal year. Proposed Maintenance Budget: FY 2010/2011 PROJECTED REVENUE 51,069,680.00 Personnel Services Regular Salaries $534,860.00 Overtime Salaries 3,680.00 Part Time Salaries 26,160.00 Fringe Benefits 253.570.00 Subtotal $818,270.00 Operations & Maintenance Operations & Maintenance $119,750.00 Operations & Maintenance -Facilities 5,000.00 Vehicle Operations & Maintenance 1,000.00 Emergency Equipment & Veh. Rntl 3,000.00 Equip Operations & Maint. 10,000.00 Contract Services 33,370.00 Contract Services/Facilities 0.00 Tree Maintenance 18,200.00 Telephone Utilities 6,250.00 Water Utilities 222,980.00 Electric Utilities 117,440.00 Assessment Administration 152,550.00 Admin./General Overhead 78,420.00 Subtotal $767,960.00 Capital Outlay Capital Outlay - Improv. Other than Bldg 75,000.00 Subtotal 75,000.00 Total PD-85 Expenditure Budget $1,661,230.00 Operating Reserve Contribution -587,220.00 Projected Revenue $1,074,010.00 Total District Assessment $1,149,190.00 Total District Parcel Count 27,733 5 P343 Each year, prior to the assessments being placed on the tax roll, the City will review the budget and determine the amount needed to maintain the improvements for the upcoming fiscal year. The actual assessment will be based on the estimated costs of maintenance, available fund balance and maximum allowable assessment with the goal of maintaining the improvements in a satisfactory and healthy condition. The actual assessment amount may be lower than the maximum allowable assessment; however it may not exceed the maximum unless the increase is approved by the property owners in accordance with Proposition 218. It is the intent of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to maintain an Operating Reserve which shall not exceed the estimated costs of maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or when the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The reserve balance information for the District is as follows: Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2011 Reserve Fund Balance $1,456,170.00 Operating Reserve Contribution -Fiscal Year 2011/12 (587,220.00) Operatine Reserve Collection -Fiscal Year 201 I /12 0.00 Estimated Fiscal Ycar Ending June 30, 2012 Reserve Fund Balance $868,950.00 Definitions of Budget Items The following definitions describe the costs and expenses included in the District Budget: Personnel Services Reeular Salaries: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all full-time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Overtime Salaries: This item includes costs attributed to work performed by full-time employees over and above their normal scheduled hours. Parl Time Salaries: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all part time employees dedicated to maintenance of the parks improvements. Fringe Benefits: This item includes the benefits available to City employees: health care, vacation, sick time, and retirement fund. Operations and Maintenance Contract Services: This item includes the contract costs of a landscape maintenance company responsible for the ongoing maintenance of the parks improvements. 6 P344 Tree Maintenance: This item includes the contract costs attributed to maintaining the street trees and other trees throughout the pazks. Utilities -Water: This item includes the costs to furnish water for the landscaping and parks. Utilities -Electric: This item includes the costs to furnish electricity required for the operation and maintenance of the parks lighting, sprinklers and irrigation controllers. Assessment Administration: This item includes the cost to all particular departments and staff of the City, and consultants for providing the administration, coordination and management of District services, operations, and incidental expenses related to the District. This item also includes creation of an annual engineer's report, resolutions and placing the assessment amounts onto the County tax roll each year, along with responding to any public inquiries and future Proposition 218 balloting proceedings. General Overhead: This item includes the costs of all departments and staff of the City for providing the coordination of District services, inspections, annual bid management, responding to public concerns, public education, accounting, auditing and procedural matters associated with the District. This item also includes an allocation for general City staff time for administrative functions and systems that provide for a functional and operational assessment district within the City's administrative structure. Capital Expenditures: Capital Projects: This item includes new improvements to further enhance the level and quality of service provided within the boundazies of the District. This may include new monuments, irrigation systems, and other large improvements. Operating Reserve Collection: Operating Reserve Collection: This item includes the amount to be collected to maintain reserves to enable the .City to pay for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal yeaz, or whenever the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax col-ections from the County, whichever is later. The Reserve Fund contribution will continue until such a time the Reserve Fund balance is approximately one half of the annual costs. The fund may be allowed to accumulate in anticipation of any unforeseen expenses not included in the yearly maintenance costs. This may include, but is not limited to, tree replacements, repair of damaged equipment due to vandalism, storms and other similar events. P345 METHOD OF SPREAD The Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 indicates that assessments may be apportioned by any formula. or method which fairly distributes costs among all lots or parcels within the District in proportion to the estimated benefit received. A. Definitions The District is divided into three categories for the purpose of determining the assessments as follows: CATEGORY A -includes parcels based on the number of existing residential units within certain ranges of parcel size. CATEGORY B -includes all parcels not defined in Category A or Category C. CATEGORY C -includes exempt parcels. Exempt parcels were discovered by searching the County Assessor's computer tapes for those pazcels that aze listed as exempt by the Assessor or which have an assessed value of less than $500. In conducting the search, several parcels were included as exempt that show parcel sizes in excess of 1.5 acres and type codes of, for example, residential or agriculture. These parcels were added back into the rolls and assessed. B. Formula The assessment formula is based on actual land use information contained in the current San Bernazdino Assessor's computer files and Assessor's parcel maps. Category A: All pazcels containing existing residential dwelling units and meeting the following conditions. Parcel Size/RanEe Less than 1.5 Acres and 1.51 to 35. Acres and 3.51 to 7.0 Acres and 7.01 to 14.0 dwelling units 14.01 to 25.0 Acres and 25.01 acres and larger Dwelline Units/Parcel 1 or more dwelling units 2 or more dwelling units 4 or more dwelling units 8 or dwelling units 15 or more dwelling units 26 or more dwelling units Category A is based on the number of existing residential units. The actual assessment for Bond Debt Service per existing residential dwelling unit may decrease each year as more residential units are built within the improvement district. Maintenance costs, however, are expected to increase annually and will somewhat offset the anticipated decrease in assessments due to new development. Category B: All pazcels not defined in Category A or Category C. Category C: All exempt parcels as defined below: P346 C. 1. All properties currently tax exempt; 2. All public ownership; 3. Railroad mainline rights-of--way 4. Major utility transmission rights-of--way; 5. Mineral rights; 6. Parcels so small they currently cannot be built upon; 7. All normally assessable parcels within an assessed valuation of less than $500 and 1.5 acres or less; and, Summary of Preliminary Assessment Amounts Category A: The preliminary estimated assessment rate, which will be levied during fiscal year 2009/2010, is $31.00 per dwelling unit for those parcels in Category A. Category A parcels containing more than one residential dwelling unit will be assessed for an amount equal to $31.00 times the number of dwelling units. Category B: The assessment, which may be levied for parcels within Category B during fiscal year 2011/2012, shall be according to the following schedule: Definition Single-Family Residential Multi-Family Residential Less than 1.5 Acres 1.51 Acres to 3.50 Acres 3.51 Acres to 7.0 Acres 7.01 Acres to 14.0 Acres 14.01 Acres to 25.0 Acres 25.01 Acres and larger Category C: Assessment Per Parcel $31.00 $31.00 $15.50 $46.50 $108.50 $217.00 $434.00 $775.00 The assessment shall be $0.00 for Category C parcels. P347 Calendar Year 2010 Annexations Parks and Recreation District - PD-85 PROJECT UNITS ANNEX. DATE 10 This Staff Report replaces Agenda pages P334 through P347. STAFF REPORT AD1.fINItiTRdTIV}? $ERVICF$ DEP~IRTD4GNT RANCHO Date: August 3, 2011 CjUCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager From: John R. Gillison, Assistant City ManageF~. By: Ingrid Y. Bruce, GIS/Special Districts Subject: CONSIDERATION TO APPROVE THE RESOLUTION CONFIRMING THE DIAGRAM AND ASSESSMENT, APPROVE THE ANNUAL ENGINEER'S REPORT, AND ORDER THE LEVY AND COLLECTION OF THE ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS WITHIN PARK AND RECREATION IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. PD~5 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2 01 1 12 01 2. NO INCREASE OF THE ASSESSMENT RATE IS PROPOSED. It is recommended that City Council approve the Resolution confirming the Diagram and Assessment, approve the Annual Engineer's Report, and order the levy and collection of the annual assessments within the Park and Recreation Improvement District No. PD-85. There is no increase to the current rate in this district proposed for Fiscal Year 2011/2012. The Engineer's Report is on file in the City Clerk's Office. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Each year, per the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972, the City is required to hold a public hearing to receive public comment on the levy and collection of assessments within Park and Recreation Improvement District No. PD-85. This requirement must be accomplished before the City can submit the annual assessments for placement on the County Tax Roll. The following, along with reference to the Engineer's Report for the Districts, identifies proposed Fiscal Year 2011/2012 assessment rates. The Engineer's Report identifies the required budget for the District, including the surplus, if any, remaining in the fund balance: Budgeted Expenses-$1,661,230.00 Estimated assessment revenues including delinquencies - $1,074,010.00 The deficit of $587,220.00 will be made up from operating reserves. This will bring the current operating reserve balance down to $868,950.00. At the current level of expenditures it will be necessary to bring the District for a Prop 218 Assessment Ballot process in Calendar Year 2013 or reduce expenses to stay within revenues. CON$IDIiRA'I'ION'I'O AI'1'Ii0\'li'I'I'l15 RId501.U'1'ION FOR PARK AND R13CRIiA'1'ION IMI'RO\'IMIiN'1' DI$'IRIC'I' NO. PD-85 roR FISCAI. Yi~;AR 2011/2012. AUGUST 3, 2011 PAGIi 2 Definition Single Family Residential Multi-Family Residential Less than 1.50 acres 1.51 acres to 3.50 acres 3.51 acres to 7.00 acres 7.01 acres to 14.00 acres 14.01 acres to 25.00 acres 25.01 acres and larger Assessment oer Parcel $31.00 $31.00 $15.50 $46.50 $108.50 $217.00 $434.00 $775.00 Attachments Resolution Engineer's Report RESOLUTION NO. ~~ i3S A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONFIRMING THE DIAGRAM AND ASSESSMENT, APPROVING THE ANNUAL ENGINEER'S REPORT AND PROVIDING FOR THE LEVY AND COLLECTION OF ASSESSMENTS WITHIN PARK AND RECREATION IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. PD-85 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2011/2012 PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga did on the 6th day of July, 2011, adopt its Resolution of Intention No.11-101 pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, as amended (the "1972 Act"), declaring its intention to levy and collect assessments within Park and Recreation Improvement District No. PD-85 for Fiscal Year 2011/2012 and giving notice of the time and place for a public hearing by the City Council on the levy of the proposed assessments within the Districts; and WHEREAS, the City Council previously received and preliminarily approved a report of the Assessment Engineer as required by the 1972 Act; and WHEREAS, notice of such public hearing was duly and legally published in the time, form and manner as required by law, shown by the affidavit of Publication of said Resolution of Intention on file in the Office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, said City Council having duly received and considered evidence, oral and documentary, concerning the jurisdiction facts in this proceeding and concerning the necessity for the contemplated work and the benefits to be derived therefrom, and said City Council having now acquired jurisdiction to order the proposed work. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, DETERMINED AND ORDERED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, as follows: SECTION 1: This City Council hereby finds and determines that notice of the public hearing has been given and the proceedings for the consideration of the levy of the annual assessments within each District have been undertaken in accordance with the 1972 Act. SECTION 2: The final assessments and diagram for the proceedings, as contained in the final Engineer's Report for the District, are hereby approved and confirmed. The assessments for the District contained in the Engineer's Report for Fiscal Year 2011/2012 are hereby confirmed and levied upon the respective lots or parcels in the District in the amounts as set forth in applicable Engineer's Report. SECTION 3: This City Council finds and determines that the public interest and convenience requires the levy and collection of assessments within the District for the Fiscal Year 2011/2012, and said City Council hereby orders that the work, as set forth and described in said Resolution of Intention No. 11-101, be done and made. SECTION 4: The above-referenced diagram and assessment shall be filed in the Office of the City Clerk. Said diagram and assessment, and the certified copy thereof, shall be open for public inspection. SECTION 5: The City Clerk is hereby ordered and directed to immediately file a certified copy of the diagram and assessment with the County Auditor. Said filing to be made no later than the 3rd Monday in August. SECTION 6: After the filing of the diagram and assessment, the County Auditor shall enter on the County assessment roll opposite each lot or parcel of land the amount assessed thereupon, as shown in the assessment. SECTION 7: The assessments shall be collected at the same time and in the same manner as County taxes are collected, and all laws providing for the collection and enforcement of County taxes shall apply to the collection and enforcement of the assessments. SECTION 8: The assessments as above confirmed and levied for these proceedings will provide revenue and relate to the fiscal year commencing July 1, 2011 and ending June 30, 2012. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of August, 2011. L. Dennis Michael, Mayor ATTEST: Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk I, Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk of the certify that the foregoing Resolution was Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga 2011. City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby duly passed, approved and adopted by the City at a regular meeting of said City Council held on Executed this , at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2011/2012 City of Rancho Cucamonga PARKS AND RECREATION IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. PD-85 Approved: TABLE OF CONTENTS Authority for Report .............................................................................. 3 Findings .............................................................................. 3 District Analysis .............................................................................. 4 Estimate of Work ..............................................................................4 Method of Spread .................................................................................... 6 Calendar Year Annexations ........................................................... 8 Boundary Map ..............................................................................9 2 City of Rancho Cucamonga Annual Report PD-85 Fiscal Year 2011/2012 AUTHORITY FOR REPORT This report for the 2011 /2012 fiscal yeaz is prepared pursuant to the order of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972, being Division 15, Section 22500 of the Streets and Highways code. Provisions for this annual assessment are included in Chapter 3 ofthe Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972. The purpose of this report is to set forth findings and the assessment analysis for the annual levy of assessments for the Park and Recreation Improvement District No. PD-85 thereafter referred to as "the District". This District, using direct benefit assessments, was originally created to provide funds to finance the cost of construction, maintenance, operation and debt payment of Heritage Community Park and Red Hill Community Park in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Subsequently the debt has been repaid with only the ongoing maintenance and operation with periodic capital improvement expenditures of the parks remaining. FINDINGS Section 22573, Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972, requires assessments to be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. The section states: "The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or pazcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements." The means of determining whether or not a parcel will benefit from the improvements is contained in the Improvement Act of 1911 (Division 7, commencing with Section 5000 ofthe Streets and Highways Code, State of California). The 1972 Act also provides for the classification of various areas within an assessment district into benefit azeas where, by reason of vaziations in the nature, location, and extent ofthe improvements, the various areas will receive differing degrees of all territory receiving substantially the same degree of benefit from the improvements and may consist of contiguous or noncontiguous azeas. As the assessments are levied on the basis of benefit, they are considered a user's fee, not a tax; and, therefore, are not governed by Article XIIIA. Properties owned by public agencies, such as a city, county, state, or the federal governments is not assessable without the approval ofthe particular agency and, normally, are not assessed. Certain other parcels used For railroad mainline right-of--way, public 3 utility transmission right-of--way, and common areas are also exempt from assessment. The assessment for mobile home parks will be based upon underlying lot acreage. DISTRICT ANALYSIS A. District Boundary The district includes all of the City of Rancho Cucamonga with the general exception of land east of Deer Creek Channel and the Victoria, Caryn & Terra Vista Planned Communities. All parcels of real property affected are more particularly described in maps prepared in accordance with Section 327 of the Revenue and Taxation Code, which are on file in the office of the San Bernardino County Assessor in the Hall of Records, 172 West Third Street, San Bernardino, California and which aze hereby made a part hereof by reference. B. District Name City of Rancho Cucamonga Park and Recreation Improvement District No. PD - 85. C. Facilities The existing works within the District boundary are generally described as follows: 1. The maintenance and operation of Heritage Community Park including, but not limited to, grading, planting, irrigation, onsite roads, sidewalks, parking lots, lighting, restrooms, equestrian facilities, playground equipment, picnic facilities, athletic facilities, and walking, jogging and equestrian trails and sanitary sewer connections. 2. The maintenance and operation of Red Hill Community Park including, but not limited to, grading, planting, irrigation, onsite roads, sidewalks, pazking lots, lighting, waterscape, restrooms, senior citizen facilities, playground equipment, picnic facilities, major lighted athletic facilities, jogging trail, sanitary sewer connections and onsite drainage inlets. D. The assessment rate for the 2011/2012 FY is $31.00. No increase to this assessment rate is proposed. It is estimated that this assessment rate will cover the district's maintenance and operation expenses for the 2011 /2012 FY. 4 ESTIMATE OF WORK The Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 permits carrying forward surpluses or recovering deficits in subsequent fiscal years. Costs for the district will be reviewed annually. Any surplus credited against assessment or any deficits shall be included in the assessment for the following fiscal year. Proposed Maintenance Budget: FY 2010/2011 PROJECTED REVENUE $1,069,680.00 Personnel Services Regular Salaries $534,860.00 Overtime Salazies 3,680.00 Part Time Salaries 26,160.00 Fringe Benefits 253 570.00 Subtotal $818,270.00 Operations & Maintenance Operations & Maintenance $119,750.00 Operations & Maintenance -Facilities 5,000.00 Vehicle Operations & Maintenance ],000.00 Emergency Equipment & Veh. Rntl 3,000.00 Equip Operations & Maint. 10,000.00 Contract Services 33,370.00 Contract Services/Facilities 0.00 Tree Maintenance 18,200.00 Telephone Utilities 6,250.00 Water Utilities 222,980.00 Electric Utilities 117,440.00 Assessment Administration 152,550.00 Admin./General Overhead 78 420.00 Subtotal $767,960.00 Capital Out1aV Capital Outlay - Improv. Other than Bldg 75 000.00 Subtotal 75,000.00 Total PD-85 Expenditure Budget $1,661,230.00 Operating Reserve Contribution -587,220.00 Projected Revenue $1,074,010.00 Total District Assessment $1,149,190.00 Total District Parcel Count 27,733 Each year, prior to the assessments being placed on the tax roll, the City will review the budget and determine the amount needed to maintain the improvements for the upcoming fiscal year. The actual assessment will be based on the estimated costs of maintenance, available fund balance and maximum allowable assessment with the goal of maintaining the improvements in a satisfactory and healthy condition. The actual assessment amount may be lower than the maximum allowable assessment; however it may not exceed the maximum unless the increase is approved by the property owners in accordance with Proposition 218. It is the intent of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to maintain an Operating Reserve which shall not exceed the estimated costs of maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or when the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The reserve balance information for the District is as follows: Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2011 Reserve Fund Balance $1,456,170.00 Operating Reserve Contribution -Fiscal Year 2011/12 (587,220.00) Operatine Reserve Collection -Fiscal Year 2011/12 0.00 Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2012 Reserve Fund Balance $868,950.00 Definitions of Budget Items The following definitions describe the costs and expenses included in the District Budget: Personnel Services Regular Salaries: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all full-time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Overtime Salaries: This item includes costs amibuted to work performed by full-time employees over and above their normal scheduled hours. Part Time Salaries: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all part time employees dedicated to maintenance of the parks improvements. Fringe Benefits: This item includes the benefits available to City employees: health care, vacation, sick time, and retirement fund. Operations and Maintenance Contract Services: This item includes the contract costs of a landscape maintenance company responsible for the ongoing maintenance of the parks improvements. 6 Tree Maintenance: This item includes the contract costs attributed to maintaining the street trees and other trees throughout the pazks. Utilities -Water: This item includes the costs to furnish water for the landscaping and parks. Utilities -Electric: This item includes the costs to furnish electricity required for the operation and maintenance of the parks lighting, sprinklers and irrigation controllers. Assessment Administration: This item includes the cost to all particular departments and staff of the City, and consultants for providing the administration, coordination and management of District services, operations, and incidental expenses related to the District. This item also includes creation of an annual engineer's report, resolutions and placing the assessment amounts onto the County tax roll each year, along with responding to any public inquiries and future Proposition 218 balloting proceedings. General Overhead: This item includes the costs of all departments and staff of the City for providing the coordination of District services, inspections, annual bid management, responding to public concerns, public education, accounting, auditing and procedural matters associated with the District. This item also includes an allocation for general City staff time for administrative functions and systems that provide for a functional and operational assessment district within the City's administrative structure. Capital Expenditures: Capital Projects: This item includes new improvements to further enhance the level and quality of service provided within the boundaries of the District. This may include new monuments, irrigation systems, and other lazge improvements. Operating Reserve Collection: Operating Reserve Collection: This item includes the amount to be collected to maintain reserves to enable the City to pay for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or whenever the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The Reserve Fund contribution will continue until such a time the Reserve Fund balance is approximately one half of the annual costs. The fund may be allowed to accumulate in anticipation of any unforeseen expenses not included in the yearly maintenance costs. This may include, but is not limited to, tree replacements, repair of damaged equipment due to vandalism, storms and other similar events. METHOD OF SPREAD The Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 indicates that assessments may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes costs among all lots or parcels within the District in proportion to the estimated benefit received. A. Definitions The District is divided into three categories for the purpose of determining the assessments as follows: CATEGORY A -includes parcels based on the number of existing residential units within certain ranges of parcel size. CATEGORY B -includes all parcels not defined in Category A or Category C. CATEGORY C -includes exempt parcels. Exempt parcels were discovered by searching the County Assessor's computer tapes for those parcels that aze listed as exempt by the Assessor or which have an assessed value of less than $500. In conducting the search, several pazcels were included as exempt that show parcel sizes in excess of 1.5 acres and type codes of, for example, residential or agriculture. These parcels were added back into the rolls and assessed. B. Formula The assessment formula is based on actual land use information contained in the current San Bernardino Assessor's computer files and Assessor's parcel maps. ' Category A: All pazcels containing existing residential dwelling units and meeting the following conditions. Parcel SizeBanae Less than I.5 Acres and 1.51 to 35. Acres and 3.51 to 7.0 Acres and 7.01 to 14.0 dwelling units 14.01 to 25.0 Acres and 25.01 acres and larger Dwelline Units/Parcel 1 or more dwelling units 2 or more dwelling units 4 or more dwelling units 8 or dwelling units I S or more dwelling units 26 or more dwelling units Category A is based on the number of existing residential units. The actual assessment for Bond Debt Service per existing residential dwelling unit may decrease each yeaz as more residential units are built within the improvement district. Maintenance costs, however, are expected to increase annually and will somewhat offset the anticipated decrease in assessments due to new development. Category B: All parcels not defined in Category A or Category C. Category C: All exempt parcels as defined below: 1. All properties currently tax exempt; 2. All public ownership; 3. Railroad mainline rights-of--way 4. Major utility transmission rights-of--way; 5. Mineral rights; 6. Parcels so small they currently cannot be built upon; 7. All normally assessable parcels within an assessed valuation of less than $500 and 1.5 acres or less; and, C. Summary of Preliminary Assessment Amounts Category A: The preliminary estimated assessment rate, which will be levied during fiscal year 2009/2010, is $31.00 per dwelling unit for those parcels in Category A. Category A parcels containing more than one residential dwelling unit will be assessed for an amount equal to $31.00 times the number of dwelling units. Category B: The assessment, which may be levied for parcels within Category B during fiscal year 2011/2012, shall be according to the following schedule: Definition Assessment Per Parcel Single-Family Residential $31.00 Multi-Family Residential $31.00 Less than 1.5 Acres $15.50 1.51 Acres to 3.50 Acres $46.50 3.51 Acres to 7.0 Acres $108.50 7.01 Acres to 14.0 Acres $217.00 14.01 Acres to 25.0 Acres $434.00 25.01 Acres and larger $775.00 Category C: The assessment shall be $0.00 for Category C parcels. Calendar Year 2010 Annexations Parks and Recreation District - PD-85 PROJECT UNITS ANNEX. DATE 10 DO NOT USE THIS STAFF REPORT. REFERENCE and USE information in the attached Staff Report P348 following page P442. STAFF REPORT AD~ZINItiTR.-1TI~~E SER~~ICEti DEP.-1RTMENT Date: August 3, 2011 To: Mayor and Members of the City Council _ Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager ,~'~ ~~~ ~`'s ~. From: John R. Gillison, Assistant City Man ~ By: Ingrid Y. Bruce, GIS/Special Districts snag ~`J /v RANCHO ~LICAMONGA Subject: CONSIDERATION TO APPROVE THE RESOLUTION CONFIRMING THE DIAGRAMS AND ASSESSMENTS, APPROVE THE ANNUAL ENGINEER'S REPORTS AND ORDER THE LEVY AND COLLECTION OF ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS WITHIN STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO'S. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 AND 8 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2011/2012. NO INCREASE OF THE ASSESSMENT RATE IS PROPOSED. It is recommended that the City Council approve the Resolution confirming the Diagrams and Assessments, approve the Annual Engineer's Reports and order the levy and collection of the annual assessments within Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8. There is no increase to the current rates in these districts proposed for Fiscal Year 201112012. The Engineer's Reports are on file in the City Clerk's Office. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Each year, per the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972, the City is required to hold a public hearing to receive public comment on the levy and collection of assessments within Street Lighting Maintenance District No's. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 (each a "District" and collectively the "Districts"). This requirement must be accomplished before the City can submit the annual assessments for placement on the County Tax Roll. The following, along with reference to the Engineer's Reports for the Districts, identifies proposed Fiscal Year 2011/2012 assessment rates. The Engineer's Reports identify the required budget for each of the Districts, including the surplus, if any, remaining in the fund balance for any District. P349 CONSIUliRn"11ON 7b A1'I'ROVI i'llir? RI:itiO] AT17ON I~OR SIRIil~I' Llcl'n1NC MAIN"11i;NnNCIi DISIRIC,"1' NOS. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 ~wU 8 FO12 FISCAI.YI~:nlt 2011 /2012 Aucusr 3, 2011 PncI~:2 The Fiscal Year 2011 /2012 budget for each District is: SLD 1 Budgeted Expenses - $1,090,340.00 Estimated assessment revenues including delinquencies - $734,260.00 The deficit of $356,080.00 will be made up from operating reserves. This will bring the current operating reserve balance down to $823,970.00. At the current level of expenditures it will be necessary to bring the District for a Prop 218 Assessment Ballot process in Calendar Year 2013 or reduce expenses to stay within revenues. SLD 2 Budgeted Expenses - $331,980.00 Estimated assessment revenues including delinquencies - $332,000.00 The current operating reserve balance is $4,990.00 and the deficit is being temporarily covered with Gas Tax; however, as the City's Gas Tax revenues decline, it will be necessary to bring the District for a Prop 218 Assessment Ballot process in Calendar 2013 or reduce expenses to stay within revenues. SLD 3 Budgeted Expenses - $427,230.00 Estimated assessment revenues including delinquencies - $338,100.00 The deficit of $89,130.00 will be made up from operating reserves. This will bring the current operating reserve balance down to $978,580.00. SLD 4 Budgeted Expenses - $227,450.00 Estimated assessment revenues including delinquencies - $160,450.00 The deficit of $67,000.00 will be made up from operating reserves. This will bring the current operating reserve balance down to $466,360.00. P350 CONSIDI ilL\'17ON TO Al'PI2OVB'I171Z RI~SOLU17ON I~YJR SIRI~ I' 1.IGI{17NG IVL\IN17:NANC1?. DISIRICI' NOS. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 Arm 8 Foa F7sC,\I.Yr.Aa 2011 /2012 Aucusr 3, 2011 Pnclc 2 SLD 5 Budgeted Expenses - $82,810.00 Estimated assessment revenues including delinquencies - $42,370.00 The deficit of $40,440.00 will be made up from operating reserves. This will bring the current operating reserve balance down to $31,480.00. At the current level of expenditures it will be necessary to bring the District for a Prop 218 Assessment Ballot process in Calendar Year 2013 or reduce expenses to stay within revenues. SLD 6 Budgeted Expenses - $163,380.00 Estimated assessment revenues including delinquencies - $125,200.00 The deficit of $38,180.00 will be made up from operating reserves. SLD 7 Budgeted Expenses - $308,340.00 Estimated assessment revenues including delinquencies - $98,730.00 The deficit of $209,610.00 will be made up from operating reserves. This will bring the current operating reserve balance down to $7,220.00. At the current level of expenditures it will be necessary to bring the District for a Prop 218 Assessment Ballot process in Calendar Year 2011 or reduce expenses to stay within revenues. SLD 8 Budgeted Expenses - $106,980.00 Estimated assessment revenues including delinquencies - $165,550.00. P351 CONSIUI iIL177ON 727 AI°1'RO\'IS "n-0? RI?SOLlT17ON I~OR S'11t1 i1L1' LIGI'r17NG Tv1e\INP11iNANCG D1S1RIC1'NOS. 1, 2, 3, 4, $, ~, 7 \NU 8I''OR I^hrrV,11 JVt?Ol ] /2012 AUGUST 3, 2011 PnG1~:2 The assessment rates arid Districts description for each of the Street Lighting Districts are as follows: Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 assessments pay for energy and maintenance for streetlights on arterial streets. The current assessment rate is $17.77 per single-family residence. The commercial rate is $35.54 per acre. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 assessments pay for energy and maintenance for streetlights on residential streets. The current assessment rate is $39.97 per single-family residence. The cgmmercial rate is $79.94 per acre. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3 assessments pay for energy and maintenance for streetlights within the Victoria Planned Community. The current assessment rate is $47.15 per single-family residence. The commercial rate is $94.30 per acre. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 4 assessments pay for energy and maintenance for streetlights within the Terra Vista Planned Community. The current assessment rate is $28.96 per single-family residence, the multi-family rate is $14.48 per dwelling unit, and the commercial rate is $57.92 per acre. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 5 assessments pay for energy and maintenance for streetlights within the Caryn Planned Community. The current assessment rate is $34.60 per single-family residence. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 assessments pay for energy and maintenance for streetlights within the commercial and industrial area of the City. The current assessment rate is $51.40 per acre for commercial property. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 7 assessments pay for energy and maintenance for streetlights within the Etiwanda Highlands Community. The current assessment rate is $33.32 per single-family residence. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 8 assessments pay for energy and maintenance for streetlights in South Etiwanda. The current assessment rate is $60.00 per single-family residence. Attachments Resolution Engineer's Reports P352 RESOLUTION NO. ~~~%37 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONFIRMING THE DIAGRAMS AND THE ASSESSMENTS, APPROVING THE ANNUAL ENGINEER'S REPORTS AND ORDERING THE LEVY AND COLLECTION OF THE ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS WITHIN STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS NO'S. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 AND 8 FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2011/2012 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga did on the 6th day of July, 2011, adopt its Resolution of Intention No. 11-095 (the "Resolution of Intention") pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, as amended (the "1972 Act"), declaring its intention to levy and collect assessments within Street Lighting Maintenance Districts No's. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 (each a "District" and collectively the "Districts") for Fiscal Year 2011/2012 and giving notice of the time and place for a public hearing by the City Council on the levy of the proposed assessments within the Districts; and WHEREAS, the City Council previously received and preliminarily approved a report of the Assessment Engineer (each an "Annual Engineer's Report" and collectively the "Annual Engineer's Reports") for each District as required pursuant to Article 4 of Chapter 1 of the 1972 Act, Article XIIID of the Constitution of the State of California ("Article XIIID") and the Proposition 218 Omnibus Implementation Act (Government Code Section 53750 and following) (the "Implementation Act") (the 1972 Act, Article XIIID and the Implementation Act are referred to collectively as the "Assessment Law"); and WHEREAS, subsequent to the preliminary approval of the Annual Engineer's Reports, the Assessment Engineer revised each of the Annual Engineer's Reports (each a "Revised Annual Engineer's Report" and collectively the "Revised Annual Engineer's Reports") to add to such reports information regarding the annexations, if any, to each applicable District during Fiscal Year 2010-2011 and to make certain other insubstantial formatting revisions to the summary of assessments and the District budgets that did not result in an increase of the expenditure budget for the Districts, or any one of them, or the aggregate assessments or any individual assessment proposed to be levied within the Districts, or any one, of them; and WHEREAS, notice of such public hearing was duly and legally published in the time, form and manner as required by the Assessment Law, shown by the affidavit of Publication of said Resolution of Intention on file in the Office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, said City Council having duly received and considered evidence, oral and documentary, concerning the jurisdiction facts in this proceeding and concerning the necessity for the contemplated work and the benefits to be derived therefrom and said City Council having now acquired jurisdiction to order the proposed work. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, DETERMINED AND ORDERED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, as follows: P353 SECTION 1. This City Council hereby finds and determines that: a. notice of the public hearing has been given and the proceedings for the consideration of the levy of the annual assessments within each District have been undertaken in accordance with the 1972 Act; and b. the annual assessments for Fiscal Year 2011/2012 proposed to be levied within each District as set forth•in,-the applicable Revised Annual Engineer's Report do not exceed the annual assessments as previously authorized to be levied within such District and, therefore, the proposed levy of assessments for Fiscal Year 2011/2012 within such District are not deemed to be "increased" over the maximum authorized annual assessments. SECTION 2. The final assessments and diagrams for the proceedings, as contained in the Revised Annual Engineer's Report for each of the Districts, are hereby approved and confirmed. The assessments for the Districts contained in the Revised Annual Engineer's Reports for Fiscal Year 2011/2012 are hereby levied upon the respective lots or parcels in the Districts in the amounts as set forth in applicable Revised Annual Engineer's Report. SECTION 3. This City Council hereby orders that the work, as set forth and described in the Resolution of Intention, be done and made. SECTION 4. The above-referenced diagram and assessment shall be filed in the Office of the City Clerk. Said diagram and assessment, and the certified copy thereof, shall be open for public inspection. SECTION 5. The City Clerk is hereby ordered and directed to immediately file a certified copy of the diagram and assessment with the County Auditor. Such filing shall be made no later than the 3rd Monday in August 2011. SECTION 6. After the filing of the diagram and assessment, the County Auditor shall enter on the County assessment roll opposite each lot or parcel of land the amount assessed thereupon, as shown in the assessment. SECTION 7. The assessments shall be collected at the same time and in the same manner as County taxes are collected, and all laws providing for the collection and enforcement of County taxes shall apply to the collection and enforcement of the assessments. SECTION 8. The assessments as above confirmed and levied for these proceedings will provide revenue and relate to the fiscal year commencing July 1, 2011 and ending June 30, 2012. P354 PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this day of August, 2011. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: L. Dennis Michael, Mayor ATTEST: Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk I, Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of said City Council held on 2011. Executed this , at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk P355 Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2011/2012 City of Rancho Cucamonga Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 (Arterial Streets) P356 ENGINEER'S REPORT AFFIDAVIT Rancho Cucamonga Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 (Arterial Streets) City of Rancho Cucamonga San Bernardino County, State. of California This Report describes the District and all relevant areas therein including the improvements, budgets, parcels and assessments to be levied for fiscal year 2011/2012, as they existed at the time of the passage of the Resolution of Intention. Reference is hereby made to the San Bernardino County assessor's maps for a detailed description of the lines and dimensions of parcels within the District. The undersigned respectively submits the enclosed Report as directed by the City Council. Dated this 3rd day of August, 2011 Approved by: Mark Steuer, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer 2 P357 TABLE OF CONTENTS OVERVIEW .........................................................................................4 SECTION 1 -DESCRIPTION OF FACILITIES ............................................5 SECTION 2 -ESTIMATE OF COSTS AND EXPENSES ..............................6 SECTION 3 -METHOD OF ASSESSMENT APPORTIONMENT ...................7 A. GENERAL ...............................................................:......7 B. ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY .......................................7 C. ASSESSMENT ................................................................8 SECTION 4 -ANNEXATIONS ................................................................9 SECTION 5 -ASSESSMENT DIAGRAMS ..............................................11 3 P358 Overview The FY 2011!2012 Annual Report for Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 (Arterial streets) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Part 2, Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Street Lighting and Light Act of 1972). Section 1 Description of Facilities The plans and specifications for improvements maintained by the Assessment District consist of a general description of the nature, location, and the extent of the improvements proposed to be maintained, and are attached hereto. Section 2 Estimates of Cost and Expenses An estimate of the maintenance cost of the improvements, including incidental costs and expenses in connection therewith for FY 2011/2012, is set forth on the lists thereof, attached hereto. Section 3 Method of Assessment Apportionment Discuses the methodology used for calculating assessments in the District. The method reflects the composition of the parcels, and the improvements and services provided, to fairly apportion the costs based on benefit to each parcel. The assessment roll states the net amount to be assessed upon all assessable lands within the District for FY 2011/2012, and describes each assessable lot or parcel of land within the District. These lots and parcels are more particularly described on the County assessment Roll, which is on file in the office of the San Bernardino County Assessor and by reference is made a part of this Engineer's Report Section 4 Annexations List the developments, which have annexed to the Street Lighting Maintenance District within calendar year 2010. Section 5 Assessment Diagrams Shows the boundaries of the areas to be annexed to the Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 and the general boundaries of the District. For details regarding the boundaries and dimensions of the respective parcels and subdivisions of land within the Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1, refer to the San Bernardino County Assessor's maps. 4 P359 Section 1 -Description of Facilities: Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (SLD #1)) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located on arterial streets throughout the City. The facilities within this district, being located on arterial streets, have been determined to benefit the City as a whole on an equal basis and as such those costs associated with the maintenance and/or installation of the facilities is assigned to the citywide district. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on arterial streets and traffic signals on arterial streets within the rights-of-way or designated easements of streets dedicated to the City. Typically, street lights are installed by private development as a condition of a development project's approval. Traffic signals can be installed by development or as a City capital improvement project. Historically, the installation of street lights and traffic signals has not been funded with Street Light District funds, however, this is permitted under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972. Any new street lights in areas to be maintained by the District will become part of the active work program at such time as these new areas are annexed into the District. The normal process will be the dedication of the areas to the City, at which time a sufficient non-refundable deposit will be made by the developer to the City. This deposit will provide for costs of energizing and six months of ordinary and usual maintenance, operation and servicing of the street lights in each development at the time of initial operation of the lighting system. The costs will be based on the number and type of street lights and based on Southern California Edison Company's rate for street lights. Immediately upon the energizing of the street lights, those street lights will become a part of the work program of the district. 5 P360 Section 2 -Estimate. of Costs and Expenses: The majority of the budgeted operating costs for SLD #1 are for electric utility charges for the streetlights and traffic signals within the district. The projected costs to operate and maintain SLD #1 are as follows: District Budget Estimated 2011/12 Budget Personnel Services Regular Salaries $22,080.00 Part-time Salaries ~ 12,700.00 Fringe Benefits 11.780.00 Subtotal Personnel $46,560.00 Operations and Maintenance Operations and Maintenance $9,150.00 Equipment Operations and Maintenance 500.00 Contract Services 0.00 Utilities Telephone Utilities 1,180.00 Electric Utilities 804,600.00 Assessment Administration 158,200.00 General Overhead 53,660.00 Interfund Allocation 16.290.00 Subtotal Operations and Maintenance 81,043,780.00 Capital Expenditures Capital Projects 0.00 Subtotal Capital Expenditures 0.00 Total District Expenditure Budget ~ $1,090,340.00 Total Estimated Assessment $777,540.00 Less Anticipated Delinquencies (43 280.00) Total Estimated Revenue $734,260.00 Plus Operating Reserve Fund Contribution 356.080.00 Total Expenditure Budget $1,090,340.00 Total Estimated Assessment $777,540.00 Total District EBU Count 43,755.76 Actual Assessment per EBU -Fiscal Year 2011/12 $17.77 Maximum Allowable Assessment cr L'6U-Fiscal Ycar 2011/12 $17.77 6 P361 Section 3 -Method of Assessment Apportionment: A. General The 1972 Act permits the establishments of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include construction, maintenance and servicing of public lights, landscaping and appurtenant facilities. The 1972 Act further requires that the cost of these improvements be levied according to benefit rather than assessed value: "The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements. " The formula used for calculating assessments in the District therefore reflects the composition of the parcels, and the improvements and services provided, to fairly apportion the costs based on benefit to each parcel. B. Assessment Methodology Equivalent Benefit Units: To assess benefits equitably, it is necessary to relate the different types of parcel improvements to each other. The Equivalent Benefit Unit method of apportionment uses the single-family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single family home equals one The Equivalent Benefit Unit (EBU). Every other land-use is converted to EBUs based on an assessment formula that equates the property's specific development status, type of development (land-use), and size of the property, as compared to asingle-family home (SFR). The EBU method of apportioning benefit is typically seen as the most appropriate and equitable assessment methodology for calculating benefit in districts formed under the 1972 Act, as the benefit to each parcel from improvements are apportioned as a function of land-use type, size and development. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land-use types to determine each parcel's EBU. 7 P362 LAND-USE/EQUIVALENT BENEFIT UNITS EBU Value lier Commercial 2.00 Vacant 2.00 Multi-Family 1.00 Single Family Residential 1.00 The following table summarizes the assessment rate for the district: Land Use Type Single Family Multi-Family Commercial/Industrial C. Assessment. Acres Acres Parcel Parcel Assessment Rate $17.77/SFD $17.77/DU $35.54/Acre All assessed lots or parcels within the District are listed on the assessment role, which is on file in the office of the City Clerk and the City Engineer, and hereby made a part of this Engineer's Report, by reference. The assessment roll states the net amount to be assessed upon all assessable lands within the District for Fiscal Year 2011/2012 and describes each assessable lot or parcel of land within the District. These lots and parcels are more particularly described on the County assessment Roll, which is on file in the office of the San Bernardino County Assessor and by reference is made a part of this Engineer's Report. 8 P363 Section 4 -Annexations: Calendar Year 2010 Annexations Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 PROJECT UNITSIACRES TOTAL EBUs ANNEXATION DATE DRC2006-00580 1.76 3.52 5/19/2010 DRC2009-00586 1.06 2.12 12/01/2010 DRC2007-00247 2.00 4.00 12/15/2010 DRC2007-00247 1.70 3.40 12/15/2010 9 P364 Section 5 -Assessment Diagram: io P365 ~ ~ y.~ _ ~ frn V 5~ N *~ f= J O Q ~ ~. ~ ~ c = U ~ ~ ~ ny I~Jay~ ~ y ~ ~ ~ _ ~ J ti.. o ~ O ~ N C ~ J m ~ ~ ~. m r o 3 0 '~ m ° a` n'd ise3 in ~ ~F.+ v .~ ny epueM!;3 .~ J w ny Ja;say oob ny Ja;sayooa y ny ua~!II!W nd ua~!II!W ny uaneH ny uaneH ny esowJaH ~ ny esowJaH nV PIe9!yoJt/ nH PIe9!4oJb' ny uewpaH ~ ny uewllaH N s L a ny pJe~au !/~ ;S ue!lawe~ s6~i ` i g g~ ig f .Ba~~FF€~s=, n S~fr S°YEn~z _F gsS~aF_ V) C _ m 0_' ny a al (~ _fr .B a s~e fr(:n~~Y~ L J ? o~a P t$~ ~€` L ~ ~ €~ - (n (6 Q c. f ei~ gg° ~ LL' C m O LL y g= ~ sEP isgg:s e _ D] EPgar'g ~f ei5~ _ pp{£ F ~g2d ~Fe-p. $ Fp e.-a aE zz 0 ~ e t _~4.ae 4F5 L¢&==e~•ES a z` Ki €eb ~eaudggoff EuBg~° ~ .s CJ Fs~saB~°SF:e P366 Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2011/2012 City of Rancho Cucamonga Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 (Local streets) P367 ENGINEER'S REPORT AFFIDAVIT Rancho Cucamonga Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 (Local Streets) City of Rancho Cucamonga San Bernardino County, State of California This Report describes the District and all relevant zones therein including the improvements, budgets, parcels and assessments to be levied for fiscal year 2011/2012, as they existed at the time of the passage of the Resolution of Intention. Reference is hereby made to the San Bernardino County assessor's maps for a detailed description of the lines and dimensions of parcels within the District. The undersigned respectively submits the enclosed Report as directed by the City Council. Dated this 3rd day of August, 2011. Approved by: Mark Steuer, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer 2 P368 TABLE OF CONTENTS OVERVIEW .........................................................................................4 SECTION 1 -DESCRIPTION OF FACILITIES ............................................5 SECTION 2 -ESTIMATE OF COSTS AND EXPENSES ..............................6 SECTION 3 -METHOD OF ASSESSMENT APPORTIONMENT ...................7 A. GENERAL ................:.....................................................7 B. ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY .......................................7 C. ASSESSMENT ................................................................8 SECTION 4 -ANNEXATIONS ................................................................9 SECTION 5 -ASSESSMENT DIAGRAMS ..............................................10 3 P369 Overview The FY 2011/2012 Annual Report for Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 (Local streets) is prepared iri compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Part 2, Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Street Lighting and Light Act of 1972). Section 1 Description of Facilities The plans and specifications for improvements maintained by the Assessment District consist of a general description of the nature, location, and the extent of the improvements proposed to be maintained, and are attached hereto. Section 2 Estimates of Cost and Expenses An estimate of the maintenance cost of the improvements, including incidental costs and expenses in connection therewith .for FY 2011/2012, is set forth on the lists thereof, attached hereto. Section 3 Method of Assessment Apportionment Discuses the methodology used for calculating assessments in the District. The method reflects the composition of the parcels, and the improvements and services provided, to fairly apportion the costs based on benefit to each parcel. The assessment roll states the net amount to be assessed upon all assessable lands within the District for FY 2011/2012, and describes each assessable lot or parcel of land within the District. These lots and parcels are more particularly described on the County assessment Roll, which is on file in the office of the San Bernardino County Assessor and by reference is made a part of this Engineer's Report Section 4 Annexations List the developments, which have annexed to the Street Lighting Maintenance District within Calendar year 2010. Section 5 Assessment Diagrams Shows the boundaries of the areas to be annexed to the Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 and the general boundaries of the District. For details regarding the boundaries and dimensions of the respective parcels and subdivisions of land within the Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2, refer to the San Bernardino County Assessor's maps. 4 P370 Section 1 -Description of Facilities: Street Light Maintenance District No. 2 (SLD #2) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals, located on local streets throughout the City but excluding those areas already in a local maintenance district. Generally, this area encompasses the residential area of the City west of Haven Avenue. It has been determined that the facilities in this district benefit this area of the City. This sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on local streets and traffic signals (or a portion thereof) on local streets generally west of Haven Avenue. Typically, street lights are installed by private development as a condition of a development project's approval. Traffic signals can be installed by development or as a City capital improvement project. Historically, the installation of street lights and traffic signals has not been funded with Street Light District funds, however, this is permitted under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972. Any new street lights in areas to be maintained by the District will become part of the active work program at such time as these new areas are annexed into the District. The normal process will be the dedication of the areas to the City, at which time a sufficient non-refundable deposit will be made by the developer to the City. This deposit will provide for costs of energizing and six months of ordinary and usual maintenance, operation and servicing of the street lights in each development at the time of initial operation of the lighting system. The costs will be based on the number and type of street lights and based on Southern California Edison Company's rate for street lights. Immediately upon energization of the street lights, those street lights will become a part of the work program of the district. 5 P371 Section 2 -Estimate of Costs and Expenses: The.majority of the budgeted operating costs for SLD #2 are for electric utility charges for the street lights and traffic signals within the district. The projected costs to operate and maintain SLD #2 are as follows: District Budget Estimated 2011/12 Budget Personnel Services Regular Salaries $0.00 Part-time Salaries 0.00 Fringe Benefits 0.00 Subtotal Personnel $0.00 Operations and Maintenance Operations and Maintenance $0.00 Equipment Operations and Maintenance 0.00 Contract Services 0.00 Utilities Telephone Utilities 0.00 Electric Utilities 268,670.00 Assessment Administration 38,440.00 General Overhead 24,870.00 Interfund Allocation 0.00 Subtotal Operations and Maintenance $331,980.00 Capital Expenditures Caoital Projects 0.00 Subtotal Capital Expenditures 0.00 Total District Expenditure Budget ~ $331,980.00 Total Estimated Assessment $364,360.00 Less Anticipated Delinquencies (32.400.001 Total Estimated Revenue $331,980.00 Plus Operating Reserve Fund Contribution 0.00 Total Expenditure Budget $331,980.00 Total Estimated Assessment $364,430.00 Total District EBU Count 9116.32 Actual Assessment per EBU -Fiscal Year 2011/12 $39.97 Maximum Allowable Assessment er EBU - Piscal Year 201 I/12 $39.97 6 P372 Section 3 -Method of Assessment Apportionment: A. General The 1972 Act permits the establishments of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public ,improvements which include construction, maintenance and servicing of public lights, landscaping and appurtenant facilities: The 1972 Act further requires that the cost of these improvements be levied according to benefit rather than assessed value: "The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements. " The formula used for calculating assessments in the District therefore reflects the composition of the parcels, and the improvements and services provided, to fairly apportion the costs based on benefit to each parcel. B. Assessment Methodology Equivalent Benefit Units: To assess benefits equitably, it is necessary to relate the different types of parcel improvements to each other. The Equivalent Benefit Unit method of apportionment uses the single-family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single family home equals one The Equivalent Benefit Unit (EBU). Every other land-use is converted to EBU's based on an assessment formula that equates the property's specific development status, type of development (land-use), and size of the property, as compared to asingle-family home (SFR). The EBU method of apportioning benefit is typically seen as the most appropriate and equitable assessment methodology for calculating benefit in districts formed under the 1972 Act, as the benefit to each parcel from improvements are apportioned as a function of land-use type, size and development. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land-use types to determine each parcel's EBU. LAND-USE/EQUIVALENT BENEFIT UNITS EBU Value Multiplier Commercial 2.00 Acres Vacant 2.00 Acres Multi-Family 1.00 Unit Single Family Residential 1.00 Unit 7 P373 The following table summarizes the assessment rate for the district: Land Use Tvpe Single Family Multi-Family Commercial/Industrial C. Assessment Assessment Rate $39.97/SFD $39.97/DU $79.94/Acre All assessed lots or parcels within the District are listed on the assessment role, which is on file in the office of the City Clerk and the City Engineer, and hereby made a part of this Engineer's Report, by reference. The assessment roll states the net amount to be assessed upon all assessable lands within the District for Fiscal Year 2011/2012, arid describes each assessable lot or parcel of land within the District. These lots and parcels are more particularly described on the County assessment Roll, which is on file in the office of the San Bernardino County Assessor and by reference is made a part of this Engineer's Report. 8 P374 Section 4 -Annexations: There are no annexations for Calendar Year 2010. 9 P375 Section 5 -Assessment Diagram: ~o P376 N v `~d ~ N HIV ;_ J N ~ a ~ ~° ~ ~ c j ~ U V) '~ ~ ~ ''~ _ ny~(JJay~ ~ ~'r ~ 4 ~ ~ ~ .._.._.._.._i ~ J ti.. j I ~ N C - ~ / c ~' ~ _ J CD ~ O ~ j m ~ 3 m p o •~ i I li Q j -_-_-- _ , _.._. _.._ ny ise3 in `w ~ I ® v .L i ny epuenn!~3 ~ ny epueMg3 I_~-~~ a~ 'i ~ ~ ~ I _I~:l ~ ~8 ~aaJ~ Re4 1 -- 1_u_. _v_u_.._e_..' ny Jalsayooa --- -._,-- ^_ .._ ny Ja~sayoob ...; ~ ~ S i ~, j ,; ~~ ny ua~!II!W f._.._.._.._.._.._ ~-i I nH ua~l!II!W ny uaneH ny uaneH ny esowSaH ~ ny esowJaH ny p!eq!yoJy nH PIeQ!4oJV ny uewilaH ~ ny uewllaH ~ s L ~ ny pSeRau!n iS ue!lau5e~ @ EE545SSf0PE°F sE E~e2i''!€ej v °sge°'4'! pi% ~ nb' anOJ~ s%4a56$~~ji;~ V) C O] 2' V) EsEEE nEb a~ m L o m ~y j'~s~~Pdn"at ~sj8 ~ ~ 0] V_ ~4pg Ei{3"~~~4 :o c 5i~ia~j 6: N m SCEji~3'gg{F;i76&6 = p43~ES8e~eli $`v a€~~da8 e$0$~ zz es=z-igi@e i U 6adi6iE~;E ji P377 Annual Engineer°s Report Fiscal Year 2011/2012 City of Rancho Cucamonga Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3 (Victoria Planned Community) P378 ENGINEER'S REPORT AFFIDAVIT Rancho Cucamonga Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3 (Victoria Planned Community) City of Rancho Cucamonga San Bernardino County, State of California This Report describes the District and all relevant zones therein including the improvements, budgets, parcels and assessments to be levied for fiscal year 2011/2012, as they existed at the time of the passage of the Resolution of Intention. Reference is hereby made to the San Bernardino County assessor's maps fora detailed description of the lines and dimensions of parcels within the District. The undersigned respectively submits the enclosed Report as directed by the City Council. Dated this 3rd day of August, 2011 Approved by: Mark Steuer, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer 2 P379 TABLE OF CONTENTS OVERVIEW .........................................................................................4 SECTION 1 -DESCRIPTION OF FACILITIES ............................................5 SECTION 2 -ESTIMATE OF COSTS AND EXPENSES ..............................6 SECTION 3 -METHOD OF ASSESSMENT APPORTIONMENT ...................7 A. GENERAL ......................................................................7 B. ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY .......................................7 C. ASSESSMENT ................................................................8 SECTION 4 -ANNEXATIONS ................................................................9 SECTION 5 -ASSESSMENT DIAGRAMS ..............................................10 3 P380 Overview The FY 2011/2012 Annual Report for Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3 (Victoria Planned Community) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Part 2, Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Street Lighting and Light Act of 1972). Section 1 Description of Facilities The plans and specifications for improvements maintained by the Assessment District consist of a general description of the nature, location, and the extent of the improvements proposed to be maintained, and are attached hereto. Section 2 Estimates of Cost and Expenses An estimate of the maintenance cost of the improvements, including incidental costs and expenses in connection therewith for FY 2011/2012, is set forth on the lists thereof, attached hereto. Section 3 Method of Assessment Apportionment Discuses the methodology used for calculating assessments in the District. The method reflects the composition of the parcels, and the improvements and services provided, to fairly apportion the costs based on benefit to each parcel. The assessment roll states the net amount to be assessed upon all assessable lands within the District for FY 2011/2012, and describes each assessable lot or parcel of land within the District. These lots and parcels are more particularly described on the County assessment Roll, which is on file in the office of the San Bernardino County Assessor and by reference is made a part of this Engineer's Report Section 4 Annexations List the developments, which have annexed to the Street Lighting Maintenance District within Calendar year 2010. Section 5 Assessment Diagrams Shows the boundaries of the areas to be annexed to the Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3 and the general boundaries of the District. For details regarding the boundaries and dimensions of the respective parcels and subdivisions of land within the Street Lighting Maintenance District,No. 3, refer to the San Bernardino County Assessor's maps. 4 P381 Section 1 -Description of Facilities: Street Light Maintenance District No. 3 (SLD #3) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located within the Victoria Planned Community. Generally, this area encompasses the area of the City east of Deer Creek Channel, south of Highland Avenue, north of Base Line Road, and west of Etiwanda Avenue. It has been determined that-t~hefiacilities in this district benefit the properties within this area of the City. This sites maintained by the district consist of streetlights on local streets and traffic signals (or a portion thereof) on local streets within the Victoria Planned Community. Typically, street lights are installed by private development as a condition of a development project's approval. Traffic signals can be installed by development or as a City capital improvement project. Historically, the installation of street lights and traffic signals has not been funded with Street Light District funds, however, this is permitted under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972. Any new street lights in areas to be maintained by the District will become part of the active work program at such time as these new areas are annexed into the District. The normal process will be the dedication of the areas to the City, at which time a sufficient non-refundable deposit will be made by the developer to the City. This deposit will provide for costs of energizing and six months of ordinary and usual maintenance, operation and servicing of the street lights in each development at the time of initial operation of the lighting system. The costs will be based on the number and type of street lights and based on Southern California Edison Company's rate for street lights. Immediately upon energization of the street lights, those street lights will become a part of the work program of the district 5 P382 Section 2 -Estimate of Costs and Expenses: The majority of the budgeted operating costs for SLD #3 are for electric utility charges for the street lights and traffic signals within the district. The projected costs to operate and maintain SLD #3 are as follows: District Budget Estimated 2011/12 Budget Personnel Services Regular Salaries $22,080.00 Part-time Salaries 12,700.00 Fringe BeneTits 11.780.00 Subtotal Personnel $46,560.00 Operations and Maintenance Operations and Maintenance $10,150.00 Equipment Operations and Maintenance 0.00 Contract Services O.OD Utilities Telephone Utilities 0.00 Electric Utilities 294,920.00 Assessment Administration 35,180.00 General Overhead 24,130.00 Interfund Allocation 16.290.00 Subtotal Operations and Maintenance $380,670.00 Capital Expenditures Capital Proieds 0.00 Subtotal Capital Expenditures 0.00 Total District Expenditure Budget $427,230.00 Total Estimated Assessment $349,200.00 Less Anticipated Delinquencies (11.110.00) Total Estimated Revenue $338,100.00 Plus Operating Reserve Fund Contribution 69 130.00 Total Expenditure Budget $427,230.00 Total Estimated Assessment $349,200.00 Total District EBU Count - 7,406.16 Actual Assessment per EBU -Fiscal Year 2011/12 $47.15 Maximum Allowable Assessment er EBU -Fiscal Year 201 I/12 $47.15 6 P383 Section 3 -Method of Assessment Apportionment: A. General The 1972 Act permits the establishments of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include construction, maintenance and servicing of public lights, landscaping and appurtenant facilities. The 1972 Act further requires that the cost of.these improvements be levied according to benefit rather than assessed value: ' "The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements. " The formula used for calculating assessments in the District therefore reflects the composition of the parcels, and the improvements and services provided, to fairly apportion the costs based on benefit to each parcel. B. Assessment Methodology Equivalent Benefit Units: To assess benefits equitably, it is necessary to relate the different types of parcel improvements to each other. The Equivalent Benefit Unit method of apportionment uses the single-family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single family home equals one The Equivalent Benefit Unit (EBU). Every other land-use is converted to EBU's based on an assessment formula that equates the property's specific development status, type of development (land-use), and size of the property, as compared to asingle-family home (SFR). The EBU method of apportioning benefit is typically seen as the most appropriate and equitable assessment methodology for calculating benefit in districts formed under the 1972 Act, as the benefit to each parcel from improvements are apportioned as a function of land-use type, size and development. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land-use types to determine each parcel's EBU. LAND-USE/EQUIVALENT BENEFIT UNITS Property Type EBU Vah Commercial 2.00 Vacant 2.00 Single Family Residential 1.00 Multi-Family Residential 1.00 Multiplier Acres Parcel Parcel 7 P384 The following table summarizes the assessment rate for the district: Land Use Type Single Family Multi-Family Commercial/Industrial C. Assessment Assessment Rate $47.15/SFD $47.15/DU $94.30/Acre All assessed lots or parcels within the District are listed on the assessment role, which is on file in the office of the City Clerk and the City Engineer, and hereby made a part of this Engineer's Report, by reference. The assessment roll states the net amount to be assessed upon all assessable lands within the District for Fiscal Year 2011/2012, and describes each assessable lot or parcel of land within the District. These lots and parcels are more particularly described on the County assessment Roll, which is on file in the office of the San Bernardino County Assessor and by reference is made a part of this Engineer's Report. 8 P385 Section 4 -Annexations: There are no annexations for Calendar Year 2010 P386 Section 5 -Assessment Diagram: io P387 M y.l ~ ~ . V '~ ' a= J M Q i U (4 ~ ~ ~ ~ c = o V ~ ~_~ - - - ny ti~ay~ ~ ~• ~ 4 ~ ~_.._.._.._..: ~ r J ti.. o ~ ~~ i C N , _ 1 Q~ _- r ~ N m 0 O •~ 1 ~ LL Q IL- 1 i - -- ._.._.._.._....._.._.._.._.._ i I I jny;sea i ~~.1 ® ~ i .1; i ny epuenn!}31 i - -- i _.._.._ ~ ny epuen~!}3 ~~ i ~ i J ' 6 i i ._.._.._.._.._.._ _.y i ny ~a}sayooa ! -- i - -~- ~ ~ ~ i ny ~a}sayooa ~ r~..~ ~ 1 i ~ ~ _ ~---~ _ ny ua~!II!W r._.._.._.._.._.._-- - ! ny ua~l!II!W ii ~ ~'. ~ i i ~ i ~ I ~- ~ ~ I i e t ! I ~ n uane -- --- ` y H - - -- - - - -- - -- n uane i d H ~ i ~ ny esow~aH i - ~~ - --- - I --- - my esowiaH ' ~ nH PIeQ!yo~V I I I I ~ -- ! -enH PIe9!4o~b' ( ~ ny uewllaH i - I - ~ ~ - - ~ ~.:~'• ~" ~ i ~ ny uewllaH i I !. r r v i ~ j ! ny p e~(au !n - ' ~ 3S ue!lawe~ ~ -r- - - - -- i 1 ~ _~ ~.._s ny anal _ F 5 $ .6@x eke El~afr _ ~ ~ O ~ d ~ c [~ LL ng$~os'$8a~=5 ~ e€=%rgF eF.E N m 6P~BY~ g gg=. ~~E~~ii~ 2 g 48 ge E~~=g[, k a ~~ ~.e~E4as :~ff~~81 =£~~BS E ZQ `~~ ~ Eo igee~,i¢f ECG'-$- ~ .e P388 ~-nnual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2011/2012 City of Rancho Cucamonga Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 4 (Terra Vista Planned Community) P389 ENGINEER'S REPORT AFFIDAVIT Rancho Cucamonga Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 4 (Terra Vista Planned Community) City of Rancho Cucamonga San Bernardino County,-State of California This Report describes the District and all relevant zones therein including the improvements, budgets, parcels and assessments to be levied for fiscal year 2011/2012, as they existed at the time of the passage of the Resolution of Intention. Reference is hereby made to the San Bernardino County assessor's maps for a detailed description of the lines and dimensions of parcels within the District. The undersigned respectively submits the enclosed Report as directed by the City Council. Dated this 3rd day of August, 2011. Approved by: Mark A, Steuer, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer II P390 TABLE OF CONTENTS OVERVIEW .........................................................................................4 SECTION 1 -DESCRIPTION OF FACILITIES ............................................5 SECTION 2 -ESTIMATE OF COSTS AND EXPENSES ..............................6 SECTION 3 -METHOD OF ASSESSMENT APPORTIONMENT ...................7 A. GENERAL ......................................................................7 B. ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY .......................................7 C. ASSESSMENT ................................................................8 SECTION 4 -ANNEXATIONS ................................................................9 SECTION 5 -ASSESSMENT DIAGRAMS ..............................................10 III P391 ~VQfVi2W The FY 2011/2012 Annual Report for Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 4 (Terra Vista Planned Community) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Part 2, Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Street Lighting and Light Act of 1972). Section 1 Description of Facilities The plans and specifications for improvements maintained by the Assessment District consist of a general description of the nature, location, and the extent of the improvements proposed to be maintained, and are attached hereto. Section 2 Estimates of Cost and Expenses An estimate of the maintenance cost of the improvements, including incidental costs and expenses in connection therewith for FY 2011/2012, is set forth on the lists thereof, attached hereto. Section 3 Method of Assessment Apportionment Discuses the methodology used for calculating assessments ih the District. The method reflects the composition of the parcels, and the improvements and services provided, to fairly apportion the costs based on benefit to each parcel. The assessment roll states the net amount to be assessed upon all assessable lands within the District for FY 2011/2012, and describes each assessable lot or parcel of land within the District. These lots and parcels are more particularly described on the County assessment Roll, which is on file in the office of the San Bernardino County Assessor and by reference is made a part of this Engineer's Report Section 4 Annexations List the developments, which have annexed to the Street Lighting Maintenance District within Calendar year 2010. Section 5 Assessment Diagrams Shows the boundaries of the areas to be annexed to the Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 4 and the general boundaries of the District. For details regarding the boundaries and dimensions of the respective parcels and subdivisions of land within the Street Lighting..Maintenance District No. 4, refer to the San Bernardino County Assessor's maps. 4 P392 Section 1 -Description of Facilities: Street Light Maintenance District No. 4 (SLD #4) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located within the Terra Vista Planned Community. Generally, this area encompasses the residential area of the City east of Haven Avenue, south of Base Line Road, north of Foothill Boulevard and west of Rochester Avenue. It has been determined that the facilities in this district benefit the properties within this area of the City. This sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on local streets and traffic signals (or a portion thereof) on local streets within the Terra Vista Planned Community. Typically, street lights are installed by private development as a condition of a development project's approval. Traffic signals can be installed by development or as a City capital improvement project. Historically, the installation of street lights and traffic signals has not been funded with Street Light District funds; however, this is permitted under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972. Any new street lights in areas to be maintained by the District will become part of the active work program at such time as these new areas are annexed into the District. The normal process will be the dedication of the areas to the City, at which time a sufficient non-refundable deposit will be made by the developer to the City. This deposit will provide for costs of energizing and six months of ordinary and usual maintenance, operation and servicing of the street lights in each development at the time of initial operation of the lighting system. The costs will be based on the number and type of street lights and based on Southern California Edison Company's rate for street lights. Immediately upon energization of the street lights, those street lights will become a part of the work program of the district street lights, those street lights will become a part of the work program of the district. 5 P393 Section 2 -Estimate of Costs and Expenses: The majority of the budgeted operating costs for SLD #4 are for electric utility charges for the street lights and traffic signals within the district. The projected costs to operate and maintain SLD #4 are as follows: District Budget Estimated 2011/12 Budget Personnel Services Regular Salaries $22,080.00 Part-time Salaries 12,700.00 Frinoe Benefits 11.780.00 Subtotal Personnel $46,560.00 Operations and Maintenance Operations and Maintenance $5,150.00 Equipment Operations and Maintenance 500.00 Contract Services 0.00 Utilities Telephone Utilities 0.00 Electric Utilities 141,160.00 Assessment Administration 22,970.00 General Overhead 11,110.00 Interfund Allocation 0.00 Subtotal Operations and Maintenance $180,890.00 Capital Expenditures Capital Projects 0.00 Subtotal Capital Expenditures 0.00 Total District Expenditure Budget $227,450.00 Total Estimated Assessment $156,730.00 Plus Anticipated Delinquencies 8 Interest 3.720.00 Total Estimated Revenue $160,450.00 Plus Operating Reserve Fund Contribution 67.000.00 Total Expenditure Budget $227,450.00 Total Estimated Assessment $156,730.00 Total District EBU Count 5,412.06 Actual Assessment per EBU -Fiscal Year 2011/12 $28.96 Maximum Allowable Assessment er EBU -Fiscal Year 2011/12 $28.96 6 P394 Section 3 -Method of Assessment Apportionment: A. General The 1972 Act permits the establishments of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include construction, maintenance and servicing of public lights, landscaping and appurtenant facilities. The 1972 Act further requires that the cost of these improvements be levied according to benefit rather than assessed value: "The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements. " The formula used for calculating assessments in the District therefore reflects the composition of the parcels, and the improvements and services provided, to fairly apportion the costs Based on benefit to each parcel. B. Assessment Methodology Equivalent Dwelling Units: To assess benefits equitably, it is necessary to relate the different types of parcel improvements to each other. The Equivalent Benefit Unit method of apportionment uses the single-family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single family home equals one The Equivalent Benefit Unit (EBU). Every other land-use is converted to EBU's based on an assessment formula that equates the property's specific development status, type of development (land-use), and size of the property, as compared to asingle-family home (SFR). The EBU method of apportioning benefit is typically seen as the most appropriate and equitable assessment methodology for calculating benefit in districts formed under the 1972 Act, as the benefit to each parcel from improvements are apportioned as a function of land-use type, size and development. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land-use types to determine each parcel's EBU. LAND-USE/EQUIVALENT BENEFIT UNITS Property Type EBU Value Multiplier Commercial 2.00 Acres Vacant 2.00 Acres Multi-Family 0.5 Unit Single Family Residential 1.00 Parcel 7 P395 The following table summarizes the assessment rate for the district: Land Use Type Single Family Multi-Family Commercial/Industrial C. Assessment Assessment Rate $28.96/SFD $14.48/DU $57.92/Acre All assessed lots or parcels within the District are listed on the assessment role, which is on file in the office of the City Clerk and the City Engineer, and hereby made a part of this Engineer's Report, by reference. The assessment roll states the net amount to be assessed upon all assessable lands within the District for Fiscal Year 2011/2012 and describes each assessable lot or parcel of land within the District. These lots and parcels are more particularly described on the County assessment Roll, which is on file in the office of the San Bernardino County Assessor and by reference is made a part of this Engineer's Report. P396 Section 4 -Annexations: There are no annexations for Calendar year 2010. P397 Section 5 - Assessment Diagram: 10 P398 ~' ~.+ V •~ .y Q~ V I ~ ^~ W •Ir ._ .~ J ti ny ua~!II!W ny uaneH ny esow~aH nV PIe9!yo~t/ ny uewllaH I 1S ue!lawe~ 0 y ny epuenn!;3 ~aa~~ neQ ny ~a;sayooa ..~ .- (A ~ ~ N v c y m 2 i - ny lu~a4~ v N C _ J [O ~ ~ :~ 3 m o 0 00 ~ Q ' N E J ~ ~' ~ ~ U ~ ~ ~~ J yr w ~~ 0 ® ~ 0 N O nb 1se3 in s v ny ~a;sayooa ny ua~!II!W I my uaneH e -' j --- ! ny esow~aH _ ! ~~ jnt/ PIe9!4o~V i - J ~' ~ ny uewllaH ~..~~ L L v ~ , !ny p~e/au!n '~ L J W ~ U) N m ! ~.! ..---.._..-` ny anal m ~ in g t L p ~ O Q LL P399 Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2011/2012 City of Rancho Cucamonga Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 5 (Caryn Community) P400 ENGINEER'S REPORT AFFIDAVIT Rancho Cucamonga Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 5 (Caryn Community) City of Rancho Cucamonga San Bernardino County, State of California This Report describes the District and all relevant sections therein including the improvements, budgets, parcels and assessments to be levied for fiscal year 2010/2012, as they existed at the time of the passage of the Resolution of Intention. Reference is hereby made to the San Bernardino County assessor's maps for a detailed description of the lines and dimensions of parcels within the District. The undersigned respectively submits the enclosed Report as directed by the City Council. Dated this 3rd day of July, 2012 Approved Mark A. Steuer, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer 2 P401 TABLE OF CONTENTS OVERVIEW .........................................................................................4 SECTION 1 -DESCRIPTION OF FACILITIES ............................................5 SECTION 2 -ESTIMATE OF COSTS AND EXPENSES ..............................6 SECTION 3 -METHOD OF ASSESSMENT APPORTIONMENT ...................7 A. GENERAL ......................................................................7 B. ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY .......................................7 C. ASSESSMENT ................................................................8 SECTION 4 -ANNEXATIONS ................................................................9 SECTION 5 -ASSESSMENT DIAGRAMS ..............................................10 3 P402 Overview The FY 2011/2012 Annual Report for Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 5 (Caryn Community) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Part 2, Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Street Lighting and Light Act of 1972). Section 1 Description of Facilities The plans and specifications for improvements maintained by the Assessment District consist of a general description of the nature, location, and the extent of the improvements proposed to be maintained, and are attached hereto. Section 2 Estimates of Cost and Expenses An estimate of the maintenance cost of the improvements, including incidental costs and expenses in connection therewith for FY 2011/2012, is set forth on the lists thereof, attached hereto. Section 3 Method of Assessment Apportionment Discuses the methodology used for calculating assessments in the District. The method reflects the composition of the parcels, and the improvements and services provided, to fairly apportion the costs based on benefit to each parcel. The assessment roll states the net amount to be assessed upon all assessable lands within the District for FY 2011/2012, and describes each assessable lot or parcel of land within the District. These lots and parcels are more particularly described on the County assessment Roll, which is on file in the office of the San Bernardino County Assessor and by reference is made a part of this- Engineer's Report Section 4 Annexations List the developments, which have annexed to the Street Lighting Maintenance District within Calendar year 2010. Section 5 Assessment Diagrams Shows the boundaries of the areas to be annexed to the Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 5 and the general boundaries of the District. For details regarding the boundaries and dimensions of the respective parcels and subdivisions of land within the Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 5, refer to the San Bernardino County Assessor's maps. 4 P403 Section 1 -Description of Facilities: Street Light Maintenance District No. 5 (SLD #5) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located within the Caryn Planned Community. Generally, this area encompasses the area of the City east of Milliken Avenue, south of Banyan Street, north of Highland Avenue and west of Rochester Avenue. It has been determined that the facilities in this district benefit the properties within this area of the City. This sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on local streets and traffic signals (or a portion thereof) on local streets within the Caryn Planned Community. Typically, street lights are installed by private development as a condition of a development project's approval. Traffic signals can be installed by development or as a City capital improvement project. Historically, the installation of street lights and traffic signals has not been funded with Street Light District funds; however, this is permitted under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972. Any new street lights in areas to be maintained by the District will become part of the active work program at such time as these new areas are annexed into the District. The normal process will be the dedication of the areas to the City, at which time a sufficient non-refundable deposit will be made by the developer to the City. This deposit will provide for costs of energizing and six months of ordinary and usual maintenance, operation and servicing of the street lights in each development at the time of initial operation of the lighting system. The costs will be based on the number and type of street lights and based on Southern California Edison Company's rate for street lights. Immediately upon energization of the street lights, those street lights will become a part of the work program of the district. 5 P404 Section 2 -Estimate of Costs and Expenses: The majority of the budgeted operating costs for SLD #5 are for electric utility charges for the street lights and traffic signals within the district. The projected costs to operate and maintain SLD #5 are as follows: District Budget Estimated 2011N2 Budget Personnel Services Regular Salaries $6.900.00 Part-time Salaries 0.00 Fringe Benefits 3.240.00 Subtotal Personnel $10,140.00 Operations and Maintenance Operations and Maintenance $7,650.00 Equipment Operations and Maintenance 0.00 Contract Services 0.00 Utilities Telephone Utilities 0.00 Electric Utilities 54,900.00 Assessment Administration 7,020.00 General Overhead 3,100.00 Interfund Allocation 0.00 Subtotal Operations and Maintenance $72,670.00 Capital Expenditures Caoital Projects 0.00 Subtotal Capital Expenditures 0.00 Total District Expenditure Budget ~ $62,610.00 Total Estimated Assessment $44,150.00 Less Anticipated Delinquencies 1 7(.80.00) Total Estimated Revenue $42,370.00 Plus Operating Reserve Fund Contribution 40.440.00 Total Expenditure Budget $82,810.00 Total Estimated Assessment $44,150.00 Total District EBU Count 1276 Actual Assessment per EBU -Fiscal Year 2011/12 $34.60 Maximum Allocable Assessment cr EBU -Fiscal Year 201 I/12 X34.60 6 P405 Section 3 -Method of Assessment Apportionment: A. General The 1972 Act permits the establishments of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include construction, maintenance and servicing of public lights, landscaping and appurtenant facilities. The 1972 Act further requires that the cost of these improvements be levied according to benefit rather than assessed value: "The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements. " The formula used for calculating assessments in the District therefore reflects the composition of the parcels, and the improvements and services provided, to fairly apportion the costs based on benefit to each parcel. B. Assessment Methodology Equivalent Benefit Units: To assess benefits equitably, it is necessary to relate the different types of parcel improvements to each other. The Equivalent Benefit Unit method of apportionment uses the single-family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single family home equals one The Equivalent Benefit Unit (EBU). Every other land-use is converted to EBU's based on an assessment formula that equates the property's specific development status, type of development (land-use), and size of the property, as compared to asingle-family home (SFR). The EBU method of apportioning benefit is typically seen as the most appropriate and equitable assessment methodology for calculating benefit in districts formed under the 1972 Act, as the benefit to each parcel from improvements are apportioned as a function of land-use type, size and development. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land-use types to determine each parcel's EBU. LAND-USE/EQUIVALENT BENEFIT UNITS Property Type Single Family Residential Multi-Family Residential Commercial/Industrial Vacant EBU Value Multiplier 1.00 Unit 1.00 Unit 2.00 Acres 2.00 Acres 7 P406 The following table summarizes the assessment rate for the district: Land Use Type Assessment Rate Single Family $34.60/SFD C. Assessment All assessed lots or parcels within the District are listed on the assessment role, which is on file in the office of the City Clerk and the City Engineer, and hereby made a part of this Engineer's Report, by reference. The assessment roll states the net amount to be assessed upon all assessable lands within the District for Fiscal Year 2011/2012, and describes each assessable lot or parcel of land within the District. These lots and parcels are more particularly described on the County assessment Roll, which is on file in the office of the San Bernardino County Assessor and by reference is made a part of this Engineer's Report. 8 P407 Section 4 -Annexations: There are no annexations for Calendar Year 2010. P408 Section 5 -Assessment Diagram: io P409 ~ ~ ~-.x ~ ~ V x~ w .~ J I() Q ~ ~ ~ c 1 ~ U (j N V ~ i - - ny ti~ay~ ~ ~' 4 ~ x_.._.._.._... v J ti'r o 1 I ~ Ln A, ' --_--1-i i ~ ~ O C r -_ /~ J CD 1 I I -__-_._-----C~ ._ _.. LL _.¢ _.._.._y . ®I ~. ~ ny;Se3 c i ~ y" _ -~--- ~.._.._..~._ .~ i ny epuenn93~ i ~ ,' i ny epuenng3 x~ i ~ ~-~--~"_ ~-,-, ) i J i ,, ~~ ~ i 1_.._o_.._e_.._u_.• ~ ~ i ny ~a~sayoob -~- ~- ~I ~ ~ ~ ~i ny ~a;sayaoy ~ ~ / A ~ i ~.. i~ 1 ~ ny ua~!II!W f._.._.._.._.._.._- ~~~~ -~'.._____~~ -~ ny ua~!II!W ~ ,~~ ~ i i I ! ny uaneH ; ~------i----~----- i n uane .-~- -- --1-- i d H i i ny esow~aH i- - - - f - - --- --: ny esow~aH ! ! --~--~-- nH PIeQ!yo~H ~- - --1 jnt/ PIeQ!yo~H 1- -~ i ny uewpaH i ~ i~-- ~--~ - t ~•~" N ny uewllaH -I - - ~ L r L ~ ~ ~ ! ny p elau!n lSue!lawe~ ~ - I --- ----- -~/ ~ L %£ ~~~€ v O Q ~a~~ _eoaz€p ~ C m LL ~f 4e~a `x%g~e~r` .N L6 6:F~°tlb FCe€Lx 0] fi~dtiz~ €xi~~ . $u~xEY`_pg4 saa °x~ E~4~38?C~g~Eg z~ ia,z e5uxg°L' a`" E~~Se~ p8 P410 Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2011/2012 City of Rancho Cucamonga Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 (Commercial/Industrial) P411 ENGINEER'S REPORT AFFIDAVIT Rancho Cucamonga Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 (Commercial/Industrial) City of Rancho Cucamonga San Bernardino County, State of California This Report describes the District and all relevant zones therein including the improvements, budgets, parcels and assessments to be levied for fiscal year 2011/2012 as they existed at the time of the passage of the Resolution of Intention. Reference is hereby made to the San Bernardino County assessor's maps for a detailed description of the lines and dimensions of parcels within the District. The undersigned respectively submits the enclosed Report as directed by the City Council. Dated this 3`d day of August, 2011 Approved by: Mark A. Steuer, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer 2 P412 TABLE OF CONTENTS OVERVIEW .........................................................................................4 SECTION 1 -DESCRIPTION OF FAGILiTIES ............................................5 SECTION 2 -ESTIMATE OF COSTS AND EXPENSES ..............................6 SECTION 3 -METHOD OF ASSESSMENT APPORTIONMENT ...................7 A. GENERAL ......................................................................7 B. ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY .......................................7 C. ASSESSMENT ................................................................8 SECTION 4 -ANNEXATIONS ................................................................9 SECTION 5 -ASSESSMENT DIAGRAMS ..............................................10 3 P413 Overview The FY 2011/2012 Annual Report for Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 (Commercial/Industrial) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Part 2, Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Street Lighting and Light Act of 1972). Section 1 Description of Facilities The plans and specifications for improvements maintained by the Assessment District consist of a general description of the nature, location, and the extent of the improvements proposed to be maintained, and are attached hereto. Section 2 Estimates of Cost and Expenses An estimate of the maintenance cost of the improvements, including incidental costs and expenses in connection therewith for FY 2011/2012, is set forth on the lists thereof, attached hereto. Section 3 Method of Assessment Apportionment Discuses the methodology used for calculating assessments in the District. The method reflects the composition of the parcels, and the improvements and services provided, to fairly apportion the costs based on benefit to each parcel. The assessment roll states the net amount to be assessed upon all assessable lands within the District for FY 2011/2012, and describes each assessable lot or parcel of land within the District. These lots and parcels are more particularly described on the County assessment Roll, which is on file in the office of the San Bernardino County Assessor and by reference is made a part of this Engineer's Report Section 4 Annexations List the developments, which have annexed to the Street Lighting Maintenance District within Calendar year 2010. Section 5 Assessment Diagrams Shows the boundaries of the areas to be annexed to the Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 and the general boundaries of the District. For details regarding the boundaries and dimensions of the respective parcels and subdivisions of land within the Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6, refer to the San Bernardino County Assessor's maps. 4 P414 Section 1 -Description of Facilities: Street Light Maintenance District No. 6 (SLD #6) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located on commercial and industrial streets throughout the City but excluding those areas already in a local maintenance district. Generally, this area encompasses the industrial area of the City south of Foothill Boulevard. It has been determined that the facilities in this district benefit the properties within this area of the City. This sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on industrial or commercial streets and traffic signals (or a portion thereof) on industrial or commercial streets generally south of Foothill Boulevard. Typically, street lights are installed by private development as a condition of a development project's approval. Traffic signals can be installed by development or as a City capital improvement project. Historically, the installation of street lights and traffic signals has not been funded with Street Light District funds; however, this is permitted under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972. Any new street lights in areas to be maintained by the District will become part of the active work program at such time as these new areas are annexed into the District. The normal process will be the dedication of the areas to the City, at which time a sufficient non-refundable deposit will be made by the developer to the City. This deposit will provide for costs of energizing and six months of ordinary and usual maintenance, operation and servicing of the street lights in each development at the time of initial operation of the lighting system. The costs will be based on the number and type of street lights and based on Southern California Edison Company's rate for street lights. Immediately upon energization of the street lights, those street lights will become a part of the work program of the district 5 *CORRECTION* Section 2 -Estimate of Costs and Expenses: The majority of the budgeted operating costs for SLD #6 are for electric utility charges for the street lights and traffic signals within the district. The projected costs to operate and maintain SLD #6 are as follows: Districf Budget Estimated 2011/12 Budget Personnel Services Regular Salaries $22,080.00 Part-time Salaries 12,700.00 Frinpe Benefits 11,780.00 Subtotal Personnel $46,560.00 Operations and Maintenance Operations and Maintenance $7,150.00 Equipment Operations and Maintenance 400.00 Contract Services 0.00 Utilities Telephone Utilities 0.00 Electric Utilities 94,790.00 Assessment Administration 5,490.00 General Overhead 8,990.00 Interfund Allocation 0.00 Subtotal Operations and Maintenance $116,820.00 Capital Expenditures Capital Projects 0.00 Subtotal Capital Expenditures 0.00 ~ Total District Expenditure Budget ~ $163,380.00 Total Estimated Assessment $127,710.00 Less Anticipated Delinquencies (2,030.00) Total Estimated Revenue $125,200.00 Plus Operating Reserve Fund Contribution 38,180.00 Total Expenditure Budget $163,380.00 Total Estimated Assessment $127,710.00 Total District EBU Count 2,484.60 Actual Assessment per Acre -Fiscal Year 2011112 $51.40 Maximum Allo~~~ahlc Assessrncnt er Acre - Fiscal Year 201 I/12 $51.40 P415 ~) P415 Section 2 -Estimate of Costs and Expenses: The majority of the budgeted operating costs for SLD #6 are for electric utility charges for the street lights and traffic signals within the district. The projected costs to operate and maintain SLD #6 are as follows: District Budget Estimated 2011112 Budget Personnel Services Regular Salaries $22,080.00 Part-time Salaries 12,700.00 Frinoe Benefits 11.780:00 Subtotal Personnel $46,560.00 Operations and Maintenance Operations and Maintenance $7,150.00 Equipment Operations and Maintenance 400.00 Contract Services 0.00 Utilities Telephone Utilities 0.00 Electric Utilities 94,790.00 Assessment Administration 5,490.00 General Overhead 8,990.00 Interfund Allocation ~ ~ 0.00 Subtotal Operations and Maintenance $116,820.00 Capital Expenditures Capital Projects 0.00 Subtotal Capital Expenditures 0.00 Total District Expenditure Budget $163,380.00 Total Estimated Assessment $127,710.00 Less Anticipated Delinquencies 2 030.00 Total Estimated Revenue $125,200.00 Plus Operating Reserve Fund Contribution 36.180.00 Total Expenditure Budget $163,360.00 Total Estimated Assessment $127,710.00 Total District EBU Count 1,002.00 Actual Assessment per Acre -Fiscal Year 2011/12 $51.40 Maximum Allowable Assessment er Acre -Fiscal Year 2011/12 $51.40 6 P416 Section 3 -Method of Assessment Apportionment: A. General The 1972 Act permits the establishments of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include construction, maintenance and servicing of public lights, landscaping and appurtenant facilities. The 1972 Act further requires that the cost of these improvements be levied according to benefit rather than assessed value: " The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements. " The formula used for calculating assessments in the District therefore reflects the composition of the parcels, and the improvements and services provided, to fairly apportion the costs based on benefit to each parcel. B. Assessment Methodology Assessment Units: To assess benefits equitably, it is necessary to relate the different types of parcel improvements to each other. The Assessment Unit (AU) method of apportionment uses an acre as the basic unit of assessment. The AU method of apportioning benefit is typically seen as the most appropriate and equitable assessment methodology for calculating benefit in districts formed under the 1972 Act, as the benefit to each parcel from improvements are apportioned as a function of land-use type, size and development. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land-use types to determine each parcel's AU. LAND-USE/ASSESSMENT UNITS Property Type AU Value Multiplier Commercial/Industrial 1.00 Acres Vacant 2.00 Acres Single Family Residential 1.00 Unit Multi-Family Residential 1.00 Unit 7 P417 The following table summarizes the assessment rate for the district: Land Use Type Assessment Rate Commercial/Industrial $51.40/Acre C. Assessment All assessed lots or parcels within the District are listed on the assessment role, which is on file in-the office of the City Clerk and the City Engineer, and hereby made a part of this Engineer's Report, by reference. The assessment roll states the net amount to be assessed upon all assessable lands within the District for Fiscal Year 2011/2012, and describes each assessable lot or parcel of land within the District. These lots and parcels are more particularly described on the County assessment Roll, which is on file in the office of the San Bernardino County Assessor and by reference is made a part of this Engineer's Report. 8 P418 Section 4 -Annexations: Calendar Year 2010 Annexations Street Light Maintenance District No. 6 PROJECT UNITS/ACRES TOTAL EBUs ANNEXATION DATE DRC2006-00580 1.76 3.52 5/19/2010 DRC2009-00586 1.06 2.12 12/01/2010 DRC2007-00247 2.00 4.00 12/15/2010 DRC2007-00247 1.70 3.40 12/15/2010 9 P419 Section 5 - Assessment Diagram: 10 P420 ~ °' ~ ~~ V w E J (p Q ~ ~ ~ ~ 9 ~ U u~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~._ ny iCuay~ ~ ^~r ~ V y~~ .._.._.._.._ ~ ~ J Y.. ~ ~ N ' ~ O ~"' I m L o '= i it I m ti Q i --- --- ---- -- -.._. _.._ ~ ~ nH 3se3 in Y.~ ~ ® ~ j i ny epueM!13~~~ ny epueM!i3 ~~ i ~ ___~~~ ~~. i J ~ ~ ~ - ~ ._.._.._.._.._.._.._.y ---I ~I ~ ~ ~~ ny ~alsayooa !-- --- -- - ~- _~ --, - ny ~alsayoob ~ ,,.. ) ~~ ny ua~!II!W C._.._.._.._. _ _- --~--I-~-' ~ n</ ua~l!II!W ~1 ~ ,~ \~ ny uaneH ' ny uaneH ny esow~aH ~ ny esow~aH nF/ PIe9!4o~'d ny Ple4!yo~H ny uewllaH N ny uewllaH N L t ~ ny p~e%au!n lS uepawe~ g€fsp~=pe~:s. R€e~s;~9a : ~ s~o:=~€as=ES _ _ _ ny anal .g€=~€=~o~n~ C m ~ ~ ~6afcoa. ~f :I t J t O W ~c''f E~~~slls ~ ~ O ~g44 sa gA: `$ (n N 6 e~ gss ~ C m lL Q ~v ~~s ;?$aai5 N ~ ~6'a ~.~T$9'aa [e a~ .D c se%f 5P>e. pe N f6 x g~'~~F:eE"~ m &$se x~g€€ d;B 2 gge;~.P,y,E~-e; g4~A%_ €gE_a pp °~F. Basg SO ~iaB ~{~~y°0~ U e . ~3~a€~E a°as.G P421 Annual Engineer°s Report Fiscal Year 2011/2012 City of Rancho Cucamonga Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 7 (North Etiwanda) P422 ENGINEER'S REPORT AFFIDAVIT Rancho Cucamonga Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 7 (North Etiwanda) City of Rancho Cucamonga San Bernardino County, State of California This Report describes the District and all relevant zones therein including the improvements, budgets, parcels and assessments to be levied for fiscal year 2011/2012, as they existed at the time of the passage of the Resolution of Intention. Reference is hereby made to the San Bernardino County assessor's maps for a detailed description of the lines and dimensions of parcels within the District. The undersigned respectively submits the enclosed Report as directed by the City Council. Dated this 3~d of August, 2011 Approved Mark A, Steuer, Director Of Engineering Services/City Engineer 2 P423 TABLE OF CONTENTS OVERVIEW .........................................................................................4 SECTION 1 -DESCRIPTION OF FACILITIES ............................................5 SECTION 2 -ESTIMATE OF COSTS AND EXPENSES ..............................6 SECTION 3 -METHOD OF ASSESSMENT APPORTIONMENT ...................7 A. GENERAL ......................................................................7 B. ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY .......................................7 C. ASSESSMENT .................................:...............................8 SECTION 4 -ANNEXATIONS ................................................................9 SECTION 5 -ASSESSMENT DIAGRAMS ..............................................10 3 P424 Overview The FY 2011/2012 Annual Report for Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 7 (North Etiwanda) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Part 2, Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Street Lighting and Light Act of 1972). Section 1 Description of Facilities The plans and specifications for improvements maintained by the Assessment District consist of a general description of the nature, location, and the extent of the improvements proposed to be maintained, and are attached hereto. Section 2 Estimates of Cost and Expenses An estimate of the maintenance cost of the improvements, including incidental costs and expenses in connection therewith for FY 2011/2012, is set forth on the lists thereof, attached hereto. Section 3 Method of Assessment Apportionment Discuses the methodology used for calculating assessments in the District. The method reflects the composition of the parcels, and the improvements and services provided, to fairly apportion the costs based on benefit to each parcel. The assessment roll states the net amount to be assessed upon all assessable lands within the District for FY 2011/2012, and describes each assessable lot or parcel of land within the District. These lots and parcels are more particularly described on the County assessment Roll, which is on file in the office of the San Bernardino County Assessor and by reference is made a part of this Engineer's Report. Section 4 Annexations List the developments, which have annexed to the Street Lighting Maintenance District within Calendar year 2010. Section 5 Assessment Diagrams Shows the boundaries of the areas to be annexed to the Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 7 and the general boundaries of the District. For details regarding the boundaries and dimensions of the respective parcels and subdivisions of land within the Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 7, refer to the San Bernardino County Assessor's maps. i 4 P425 Section 1 -Description of Facilities: Street Light Maintenance District No. 7 (SLD #7) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located on local streets in what is termed the North Etiwanda area of the City. Generally, this area encompasses the area of the City east of Day Creek Channel and north of Highland Avenue within the incorporated area of the city. It has been defermiried that the facilities in this district benefit the properties within this area of the City. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on local streets and traffic signals (or a portion thereof) on local streets within the North Etiwanda area. Typically, street lights are installed by private development as a condition of a development project's approval. Traffic signals can be installed by development or as a City capital improvement project. Historically, the installation of street lights and traffic signals has not been funded with Street Light District funds, however, this is permitted under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972. Any new street lights in areas to be maintained by the District will become part of the active work program at such time as these new areas are annexed into the District. The normal process will be the dedication of the areas to the City, at which time a sufficient non-refundable deposit will be made by the developer to the City. This deposit will provide for costs of energizing and six months of ordinary and usual maintenance, operation and servicing of the street lights in each development at the time of initial operation of the lighting system. The costs will be based on the number and type of street lights and based on Southern California Edison Company's rate for street lights. Immediately upon energization of the street lights, those street lights will become a part of the work program of the district. 5 P426 Section 2 -Estimate of Costs and Expenses: The majority of the budgeted operating costs for SLD #7 are for electric utility charges for the street lights and traffic signals within the district. The projected costs to operate and maintain SLD #7 are as follows: District Budget Estimated . 2011/12 Budget Personnel Services Regular Salaries $22,080.00 Part-time Salaries 12,700.00 Fringe Benefits 11.780.00 Subtotal Personnel $46,560.00 Operations and Maintenance Operations and Maintenance $5,150.00 Equipment Operations and Maintenance 0.00 Contract Services 14,670.00 Utilities Telephone Utilities 0.00 Electric Utilities 201,320.00 Assessment Administration 17,170.00 General Overhead 7,180.00 Interfund Allocation 16.290.00 Subtotal Operations and Maintenance $261,760.00 Capital Expenditures Capital Projects 0.00 Subtotal Capital Expenditures 0.00 Total District Expenditure Budget $308,340.00 Total Estimated Assessment $104,020.00 Less Anticipated Delinquencies 5 290.00 Total Estimated Revenue $98,730.00 Plus Operating Reserve Fund Contribution ~ 209.610.00 Total Expenditure Budget $306,340.00 Total Estimated Assessment $104,020.00 Total District EBU Count 3122.00 Actual Assessment per EBU -Fiscal Year 2011!12 $33.32 Maximum Allowable Assessment er L'BU-fiscal Year 2011/12 $33.32 6 P427 Section 3 -Method of Assessment Apportionment: A. General The 1972 Act permits the ,establishments of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include construction, maintenance and servicing of public lights, landscaping and appurtenant facilities. The 1972 Act further requires that the cost of these improvements be levied according to benefit rather than assessed value: "The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements. " The formula used for calculating assessments in the District therefore reflects the composition of the parcels, and the improvements and services provided, to fairly apportion the costs based on benefit to each parcel. B. Assessment Methodology Equivalent Benefit Units: To assess benefits equitably, it is necessary to relate the different types of parcel improvements to each other. The Equivalent Benefit Unit method of apportionment uses the single-family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single family home equals one The Equivalent Benefit Unit (EBU). Every other land-use is converted to EBU's based on an assessment formula that equates the property's specific development status, type of development (land-use), and size of the property, as compared to asingle-family home (SFR). The EBU method of apportioning benefit is typically seen as the most appropriate and equitable assessment methodology for calculating benefit in districts formed under the 1972 Act, as the benefit to each parcel from improvements are apportioned as a function of land-use type, size and development. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land-use types to determine each parcel's EBU. LAND-USE/EQUIVALENT BENEFIT UNITS Property Type EBU Value Multiplier Commercial/Industrial 2.00 Acres Vacant 2.00 Acres Single Family Residential 1.00 Unit Multi-Family Residential 1.00 Unit 7 P428 The following table summarizes the assessment rate for the district: Land Use Tvpe Assessment Rate Single Family $33.32/SFD C. Assessment All assessed lots or parcels within the District are listed on the assessment role, which is on file in the office of the City Clerk and the City Engineer, and hereby made a part of this Engineer's Report, by reference. The assessment roll states the net amount to be assessed upon all assessable lands within the District for Fiscal Year 2011/2012, and describes each assessable lot or parcel of land within the District. These lots and parcels are more particularly described on the County assessment Roll, which is on file in the office of the San Bernardino County Assessor and by reference is made a part of this Engineer's Report. 8 P429 Section 4 -Annexations: There are no annexations for Calendar year 2010: 9 P430 Section 5 - Assessment Diagram: io P437 N N ~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~_ +~1 J ~ Q Q ~ ~. ~ C = () (~ ~ ~ ~ - - ny ~(JJay~ ~ y ~ o ~ J S.. ~ o tr ~ N NNo C N J ^] ~ ~ `~~i N L 3 ~ 0 O ,_ °° o ///. ,~ ¢` ._. __. ._.._.._..r.._.._.._.._.._y ® ~ nd $Se3 vJ w E v _ _.._.._.. i ny epuen~!l3 ~~ ~ -- - i %- J ; ~ 1= i r.+ - i y ~ ~ ~ ~ ( i L ny Jalsayooa !--- --- i y.r ' I_ - i ~ i ny Ja~sayooa ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~~_ _~~ - ~ i ._. ?~- ~ -- - --0 ny ua>I!II!W r._.._.._..-• -~ ~ i ny ua>I!II!W i i i ~ `~ i i ny uaneH ~ I -- - my uaneH --'--~- I i nyesowJaH i-...._. _ .----~ - - ---- I- !nyesowJaH i ny PIe9!4oJ`d ~ ~ - ny p!eq!yoJy ( i ny uewllaH i - ~ ---- -- - - ~.:~" ~ ny uewllaH 1 I ~<~• L w v .--~- ! ny pJe6au!n ~S uepawe~ ~ - - --- -J/ I~\ i . --}-- - -;1 ~ } s§fi°456&G" .i ~:._ ~ 1 s EEE° et 3~n~e i .._..~ .._ _.Y. .._r_ _ _r ny anOJ~ 'a_s4< 6f "5€ •~' rn ~ ~ o ao s € a r.._.. a_.._.. .._.._ N ~asq$°gy tEEE~$ 'o ~ m O Q Fee rgga ~E€ z e N m 6$ ~E~.p •Ei a ~ @E°d E E9~~Y ~~p$n~a zo ~ e4F~E Haa 9p9pa~~~ a~ 6=3n$'"FEE ~~B -- U ~x~saidesFS~ P432 Annua! Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2011/2012 City of Rancho Cucamonga Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 8 (South Etiwanda) P433 ENGINEER'S REPORT AFFIDAVIT Rancho Cucamonga Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 8 (South Etiwanda) City of Rancho Cucamonga San Bernardino County, State of California This Report describes the District and all relevant zones therein including the improvements, budgets, parcels and assessments to be levied for fiscal year 2011/2012, as they existed at the time of the passage of the Resolution of Intention. Reference is hereby made to the San Bernardino County assessor's maps for a detailed description of the lines and dimensions of parcels within the District. The undersigned respectively submits the enclosed Report as directed by the City Council. Dated this 3rd of August, 2011. Approved by: Mark A. Steuer, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer II P434 TABLE OF CONTENTS OVERVIEW .........................................................................................4 SECTION 1 -DESCRIPTION OF FACILITIES ............................................5 SECTION 2 -ESTIMATE OF COSTS AND EXPENSES ..............................6 SECTION 3 -METHOD OF ASSESSMENT APPORTIONMENT ...................7 A. GENERAL ......................................................................7 B. ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY .......................................7 C. ASSESSMENT ................................................................8 SECTION 4 -ANNEXATIONS ................................................................9 SECTION 5 -ASSESSMENT DIAGRAMS ..............................................10 III P435 Overview The FY 2011/2012 Annual Report for Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 8 (South Etiwanda) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Part 2, Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Street Lighting and Light Act of 1972). Section 1 Description of Facilities The plans and specifications for improvements maintained by the Assessment District consist of a general description of the nature, location, and the extent of the improvements proposed to be maintained, and are attached hereto. Section 2 Estimates of Cost and Expenses An estimate of the maintenance cost of the improvements, including incidental costs and experises in connection therewith for FY 2011/2012, is set forth on the lists thereof, attached hereto. Section 3 Method of Assessment Apportionment Discuses the methodology used for calculating assessments in the District. The method reflects the composition of the parcels, and the improvements and services provided, to fairly apportion the costs based on benefit to each parcel. The assessment roll states the net amount to be assessed upon all assessable lands within the District for FY 2011/2012, and describes each assessable lot or parcel of land within the District. These lots and parcels are more particularly described on the County assessment Roll, which is on file in the office of the San Bernardino County Assessor and by reference is made a part of this Engineer's Report Section 4 Annexations List the developments, which have annexed to the Street Lighting Maintenance District within Calendar year 2010. Section 5 Assessment Diagrams Shows the boundaries of the areas to be annexed to the Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 8 and the general boundaries of the District. For details regarding the boundaries and dimensions of the respective parcels and subdivisions of land within the Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 8, refer to the San Bernardino County Assessor's maps. 4 P436 „_,. Section 1 -Description of Facilities: Street Light Maintenance District No. 8 (SLD #8) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located on local streets in what is termed the South Etiwanda area of the City. Generally, this area encompasses the area of the City east of Etiwanda Avenue, north of Foothill Boulevard and south of Highland Avenue within the incorporated area of the City. It has been determined that the facilities in this district benefit the properties within this area of the City. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on local streets and traffic signals (or a portion thereof) on local streets within the South Etiwanda area. Typically, street lights are installed by private development as a condition of a development project's approval. Traffic signals can be installed by development or as a City capital improvement project. Historically, the installation of street lights and traffic signals has not been funded with Street Light District funds; however, this is permitted under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972. Any new street lights in areas to be maintained by the District will become part of the active work program at such time as these new areas are annexed into the District. The normal process will be the dedication of the areas to the City, at which time a sufficient non-refundable deposit will be made by the developer to the City. This deposit will provide for costs of energizing and six months of ordinary and usual maintenance, operation and servicing of the street lights in each development at the time of initial operation of the lighting system. The costs will be based on the number and type of street lights and based on Southern California Edison Company's rate for street lights. Immediately upon energization of the street lights, those street lights will become a part of the work program of the district. 5 * C O R R E C T I O N Section 2 -Estimate of Costs and Expenses: The majority of the budgeted operating costs for SLD #8 are for electric utility charges for the street lights and traffic signals within the district. The projected costs to operate and maintain SLD #8 are as follows: District Budget Estimated 2011112 Budget Personnel Services Regular Salaries $22,700.00 Part-time Salaries 12,700.00 Fringe Benefits 11,130.00 Subtotal Personnel $44,530.00 Operations and Maintenance Operations and Maintenance $5,150.00 Equipment Operations and Maintenance 0.00 Contract Services 14,670.00 Utilities Telephone Utilities 0.00 Electric Utilities 66,540.00 Assessment Administration 9,390.00 General Overhead 8,980.00 Interfund Allocation 16.290.00 Subtotal Operations and Maintenance $121,020.00 Capital Expenditures Capital Projects 0.00 Subtotal Capital Expenditures 0.00 Total District Expenditure Budget ~ $165,550.00 Total Estimated Assessment $131,830.00 Less Anticipated Delinquencies ~0 00) Total Estimated Revenue $131,830.00 Plus Operating Reserve Fund Contribution 33,710.00 Total Expenditure Budget $165,550.00 Total Estimated Assessment $131,830.00 Total District EBU Count 2,144.56 Actual Assessment per EBU -Fiscal Year 2011/12 $61.19 !~1a~innim,Allo~~able Asscssmcnt rr I:f3l' - Fi~~~rl l rar?lll 1/lZ $I~)3.-t5 P437 P438 Section 3 -Method of Assessment Apportionment: A. General The 1972 Act permits the establishments of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include construction, maintenance and servicing of public lights, landscaping and appurtenant facilities. The 1972 Act further requires that the cost of these improvements be levied according to benefit rather than assessed value: "The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements. " The formula used for calculating assessments in the District therefore reflects the composition of the parcels, and the improvements and services provided, to fairly apportion the costs based on benefit to each parcel. B. Assessment Methodology Equivalent Benefit Units: To assess benefits equitably, it is necessary to relate the different types of parcel improvements to each other. The Equivalent Benefit Unit method of apportionment uses the single-family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single family home equals one The Equivalent Benefit Unit (EBU). Every other land-use is converted to EBU's based on an assessment formula that equates the property's specific development status, type of development (land-use), and size of the property, as compared to asingle-family home (SFR). The EBU method of apportioning benefit is typically seen as the most appropriate and equitable assessmenYmethodology for calculating benefit in districts formed under the 1972 Act, as the benefit to each parcel from improvements are apportioned as a function of land-use type, size and development. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land-use types to determine each parcel's EBU. LAND-USE/EQUIVALENT BENEFIT UNITS EBU Value ier Multi-Family Residential 1.00 Single Family Residential 1.00 Commercial/Industrial 2.00 Vacant 2.00 Urnt Unit Acre Acre 7 P439 The following table summarizes the assessment rate for the district: Land Use Type Assessment Rate Single Family $193.75/SFD C. Assessment All assessed lots or parcels within the District are listed on the assessment role, which is on file in the office of the City Clerk and the City Engineer, and hereby made a part of this Engineer's Report, by reference. The assessment roll states the net amount to be assessed upon all assessable lands within the District for Fiscal Year 2011/2012, and describes each assessable lot or parcel of land within the District. These lots and parcels are more particularly described on the County assessment Roll, which is on file in the office of the San Bernardino County Assessor and by reference is made a part of this Engineer's Report. 8 P440 Section 4 -Annexations: PROJECT UNITS/ACRES TOTAL EBUs ANNEXATION DATE 0227-071-17 5.0 2.0 6/2/2010 P441 Section 5 -Assessment Diagram: io P442 /~y~ N W ~ `I~1 ~ ~ +~ J pp ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ c j = U U) 'n G1 ~ '' ~.__ - ny ~JJay~ ~ ^'r ti ~ •V' i I N N C - -._ / ~ ~ /~~ ~ ~ m ~ O W 1 y.+ 1 ~ r 3 C En ° ° '~ ! I ~i Q i - _.._ _.._.. i iny ise3 in L y.+ i E v .`` iny epuenn93 i -..-~-° ~ ny epuenn!l3 ,~ i __ ,~-' ---- i ~ •j18 ~aaJ~ lea I { ~~ ~.. ~ i ~ ,_.._.._..-.._.._.._..E i y ny JaEsayooa - -- -- --I / ~- iny Jalsayaob ._ ..; i ~ ~ ~ -' i _~i- - E ny ua~!II!W ~.-.._.._.._ r _- , , i "--------i ny ua~!II!W i ~I i ~ ~ ~ i 1`~ ! i ny uaneH ~ ------ ~ ---- --i -iny uaneH i _ E ny esowlaH i-- - - -- -- --- - -- - - ----- -iny esowlaH i 1 i nV Pleq!yaJy ~ ~ ,- ~ ---iny Pley!4a1V ny uewllaH i ~ - I ~•~" N ny uewllaH ~" ~ s ~• L ~ 1 ~~ i ! ny pJe/au!/~ lS ue!lawe~ ~ ---- - - --- ~ i j ~.) \ i ~ °~5~egpE` 1r _. ~ '~' ~ d ~ O W ~x SEe 1~j Ps •• a-..-a.'' .._.._ C LO lL Q Ey~~F EEaeF'~4 ~ ~ ~ 41 ~e v c $4p~g`~eg~c@.° O7 g@€~F~~EEa~E g gEY=e~: Y~~~E np4=a6g oz E2~E 3°g 2YP p-E§{ zs Er3o e.~?€e[E ..- U EtBYgEE.%EEe This Staff Report replaces Agenda pages P348 through P442. STAFF REPORT ADMINISTR~ITIVE SERVICES DEPa9RTMENT Date: August 3, 2011 To: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager From: John R. Gillison, Assistant City Man By: Ingrid Y. Bruce, GIS/Special Districts anag jZANCxo cUCAMONGA Subject: CONSIDERATION TO APPROVE THE RESOLUTION CONFIRMING THE DIAGRAMS AND ASSESSMENTS, APPROVE THE ANNUAL ENGINEER'S REPORTS AND ORDER THE LEVY AND COLLECTION OF ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS WITHIN STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO'S. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 AND 8 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2011/2012. NO INCREASE OF THE ASSESSMENT RATE IS PROPOSED. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council approve the Resolution confirming the Diagrams and Assessments, approve the Annual Engineer's Reports and order the levy and collection of the annual assessments within Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8. There is no increase to the current rates in these districts proposed for Fiscal Year 2011/2012. The Engineer's Reports are on file in the City Clerk's Office. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Each year, per the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972, the City is required to hold a public hearing to receive public comment on the levy and collection of assessments within Street Lighting Maintenance District No's. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 (each a "District" and collectively the "Districts'). This requirement must be accomplished before the City can submit the annual assessments for placement on the County Tax Roll. The following, along with reference to the Engineer's Reports for the Districts, identifies proposed Fiscal Year 2011/2012 assessment rates. The Engineer's Reports identify the required budget for each of the Districts, including the surplus, if any, remaining in the fund balance for any District. CONSIDIIIL\77ON'1'O Al'I'I2OV1 2'17211 R1rSOLU11ON 1~'OR 5112111 ~'I' LIGI'r11NG IVL\INI7INANCI r DISIRICI'NOS. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, ~, 7 nNn~ 8 roll r'ISCAI. YI1,\x 2017 /2012 AUGUST 3, 2011 R1G112 The Fiscal Year 2011/2012 budget for each District is SLD 1 Budgeted Expenses - $1,090,340.00 Estimated assessment revenues including delinquencies - $734,260.00 The deficit of $356,080.00 will be made up from operating reserves. This will bring the current operating reserve balance down to $823,970.00. At the current level of expenditures it will be necessary to bring the District for a Prop 218 Assessment Ballot process in Calendar Year 2013 or reduce expenses to stay within revenues. SLD 2 Budgeted Expenses - $331,980.00 Estimated assessment revenues including delinquencies - $332,000.00 The current operating reserve balance is $4,990.00 and the deficit is being temporarily covered with Gas Tax; however, as the City's Gas Tax revenues decline, it will be necessary to bring the District for a Prop 218 Assessment Ballot process in Calendar 2013 or reduce expenses to stay within revenues. SLD 3 Budgeted Expenses - $427,230.00 Estimated assessment revenues including delinquencies - $338,100.00 The deficit of $89,130.00 will be made up from operating reserves. This will bring the current operating reserve balance down to $978,580.00. SLD 4 Budgeted Expenses - $227,450.00 Estimated assessment revenues including delinquencies - $160,450.00 The deficit of $67,000.00 will be made up from operating reserves. This will bring the current operating reserve balance down to $466,360.00. CONSIDI?&T17ON 7b Al'I'ROV I i'171E I21 ~ tiOI,U17ON I ~OR $7RI?I~; I' LIGI'n7NG IVL\RS17?NANCI? DISIRIGI' NOS. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 ,wl~ 8 FOR Flsc:nLYl?nlt 2011/2012 Aucusl' 3, 2011 PAGIl.2 SLD 5 Budgeted Expenses - $82,810.00 Estimated assessment revenues including delinquencies - $42,370.00 The deficit of $40,440.00 will be made up from operating reserves. This will bring the current operating reserve balance down to $31,480.00. At the current level of expenditures it will be necessary to bring the District for a Prop 218 Assessment Ballot process in Calendar Year 2013 or reduce expenses to stay within revenues. SLD 6 Budgeted Expenses - $163,380.00 Estimated assessment revenues including delinquencies - $125,200.00 The deficit of $38,180.00 will be made up from operating reserves. SLD 7 Budgeted Expenses - $308,340.00 Estimated assessment revenues including delinquencies - $98,730.00 The deficit of $209,610.00 will be made up from operating reserves. This will bring the current operating reserve balance down to $7,220.00. At the current level of expenditures it will be necessary to bring the District for a Prop 218 Assessment Ballot process in Calendar Year 2011 or reduce expenses to stay within revenues. SLD 8 Budgeted Expenses - $106,980.00 Estimated assessment revenues including delinquencies - $165,550.00 CONSIDP12~Y170N'1Y) AI'PROVG "17-II? RFSOlAl170N I~OR S'17t1'.I':I' LIGII'17NG IVLVN17iNANCli DIS17tIC1'NOS. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 nND 8 Foa F7scnI.YF.n11 201 1 /201 2 AUGUSr 3, 2011 PAG732 The assessment rates and Districts description for each of the Street Lighting Districts are as follows: Street Liohtinq Maintenance District No. 1 assessments pay for energy and maintenance for streetlights on arterial streets. The current assessment rate is $17.77 per single-family residence. The commercial rate is $35.54 per acre. Street Liohtinq Maintenance District No. 2 assessments pay for energy and maintenance for streetlights on residential streets. The current assessment rate is $39.97 per single-family residence. The commercial rate is $79.94 per acre. Street Liohtinq Maintenance District No. 3 assessments pay for energy and maintenance for streetlights within the Victoria Planned Community. The current assessment rate is $47.15 per single-family residence. The commercial rate is $94.30 per acre. Street Liohtinq Maintenance District No. 4 assessments pay for energy and maintenance for streetlights within the Terra Vista Planned Community. The current assessment rate is $28.96 per single-family residence, the multi-family rate is $14.48 per dwelling unit, and the commercial rate is $57.92 per acre. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 5 assessments pay for energy and maintenance for streetlights within the Caryn Planned Community. The current assessment rate is $34.60 per single-family residence. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 assessments pay for energy and maintenance for streetlights within the commercial and industrial area of the City. The current assessment rate is $51.40 per acre for commercial property. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 7 assessments pay for energy and maintenance for streetlights within the Etiwanda Highlands Community. The current assessment rate is $33.32 per single-family residence. Street Liohtinq Maintenance District No. 8 assessments pay for energy and maintenance for streetlights in South Etiwanda. The current assessment rate is $60.00 per single-family residence. Attachments Resolution Engineer's Reports RESOLUTION NO. ~~~~.37 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONFIRMING THE DIAGRAMS AND THE ASSESSMENTS, APPROVING THE ANNUAL ENGINEER'S REPORTS AND ORDERING THE LEVY AND COLLECTION OF THE ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS WITHIN STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS NO'S. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 AND 8 FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2011/2012 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga did on the 6th day of July, 2011, adopt its Resolution of Intention No. 11-095 (the "Resolution of Intention") pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, as amended (the "1972 Act"), declaring its intention to levy and collect assessments within Street Lighting Maintenance Districts No's. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 (each a "District" and collectively the "Districts") for Fiscal Year 2011/2012 and giving notice of the time and place for a public hearing by the City Council on the levy of the proposed assessments within the Districts; and WHEREAS, the City Council previously received and preliminarily approved a report of the Assessment Engineer (each an "Annual Engineer's Report" and collectively the "Annual Engineer's Reports") for each District as required pursuant to Article 4 of Chapter 1 of the 1972 Act, Article XIIID of the Constitution of the State of California ("Article XIIID") and the Proposition 218 Omnibus Implementation Act (Government Code Section 53750 and following) (the "Implementation Act") (the 1972 Act, Article XIIID and the Implementation Act are referred to collectively as the "Assessment Law"); and WHEREAS, subsequent to the preliminary approval of the Annual Engineer's Reports, the Assessment Engineer revised each of the Annual Engineer's Reports (each a "Revised Annual Engineer's Report" and collectively the "Revised Annual Engineer's Reports") to add to such reports information regarding the annexations, if any, to each applicable District during Fiscal Year 2010-2011 and to make certain other insubstantial formatting revisions to the summary of assessments and the District budgets that did not result in an increase of the expenditure budget for the Districts, or any one of them, or the aggregate assessments or any individual assessment proposed to be levied within the Districts, or any one, of them; and WHEREAS, notice of such public hearing was duly and legally published in the time, form and manner as required by the Assessment Law, shown by the affidavit of Publication of said Resolution of Intention on file in the Office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, said City Council having duly received and considered evidence, oral and documentary, concerning the jurisdiction facts in this proceeding and concerning the necessity for the contemplated work and the benefits to be derived therefrom and said City Council having now acquired jurisdiction to order the proposed work. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, DETERMINED AND ORDERED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, as follows: SECTION 1. This City Council hereby finds and determines that a. notice of the public hearing has been given and the proceedings for the consideration of the levy of the annual assessments within each District have been undertaken in accordance with the 1972 Act; and b. the annual assessments for Fiscal Year 2011/2012 proposed to be levied within each District as set forth in the applicable Revised Annual Engineer's Report do not exceed the annual assessments as previously authorized to be levied within such District and, therefore, the proposed levy of assessments for Fiscal Year 2011/2012 within such District are not deemed to be "increased" over the maximum authorized annual assessments. SECTION 2. The final assessments and diagrams for the proceedings, as contained in the Revised Annual Engineer's Report for each of the Districts, are hereby approved and confirmed. The assessments for the Districts contained in the Revised Annual Engineer's Reports for Fiscal Year 2011/2012 are hereby levied upon the respective lots or parcels in the Districts in the amounts as set forth in applicable Revised Annual Engineer's Report. SECTION 3. This City Council hereby orders that the work, as set forth and described in the Resolution of Intention, be done and made. SECTION 4. The above-referenced diagram and assessment shall be filed in the Office of the City Clerk. Said diagram and assessment, and the certified copy thereof, shall be open for public inspection. SECTION 5. The City Clerk is hereby ordered and directed to immediately file a certified copy of the diagram and assessment with the County Auditor. Such filing shall be made no later than the 3rd Monday in August 2011. SECTION 6. After the filing of the diagram and assessment, the County Auditor shall enter on the County assessment roll opposite each lot or parcel of land the amount assessed thereupon, as shown in the assessment. SECTION 7. The assessments shall be collected at the same time and in the same manner as County taxes are collected, and all laws providing for the collection and enforcement of County taxes shall apply to the collection and enforcement of the assessments. SECTION 8. The assessments as above confirmed and levied for these proceedings will provide revenue and relate to the fiscal year commencing July 1, 2011 and ending June 30, 2012. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this day of August, 2011. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: ATTEST: L. Dennis Michael, Mayor Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk I, Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of said City Council held on .2011. Executed this , at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2011/2012 City of Rancho Cucamonga Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 (Arterial Streets) ENGINEER'S REPORT AFFIDAVIT Rancho Cucamonga Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 (Arterial Streets) City of Rancho Cucamonga San Bernardino County, State of California This Report describes the District and all relevant areas therein including the improvements, budgets, parcels and assessments to be levied for fiscal year 2011/2012, as they existed at the time of the passage of the Resolution of Intention. Reference is hereby made to the San Bernardino County assessor's maps for a detailed description of the lines and dimensions of parcels within the District. The undersigned respectively submits the enclosed Report as directed by the City Council. Dated this 3rd day of August 2011 Approved of Engineering Services/City Engineer TABLE OF CONTENTS OVERVIEW .........................................................................................4 SECTION 1 -DESCRIPTION OF FACILITIES ...................................:........5 SECTION 2 -ESTIMATE OF COSTS AND EXPENSES ..............................6 SECTION 3 -METHOD OF ASSESSMENT APPORTIONMENT ...................7 A. GENERAL ......................................................................7 B. ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY .......................................7 C. ASSESSMENT ................................................................8 SECTION 4 -ANNEXATIONS ................................................................9 SECTION 5 -ASSESSMENT DIAGRAMS ..............................................11 3 Overview The FY 2011/2012 Annual Report for Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 (Arterial streets) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Part 2, Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Street Lighting and Light Act of 1972). Section 1 Description of Facilities The plans and specifications for improvements maintained by the Assessment District consist of a general description of the nature, location, and the extent of the improvements proposed to be maintained, and are attached hereto. Section 2 Estimates of Cost and Expenses An estimate of the maintenance cost of the improvements, including incidental costs and expenses in connection therewith for FY 2011/2012, is set forth on the lists thereof, attached hereto. Section 3 Method of Assessment Apportionment Discuses the methodology used for calculating assessments in the District. The method reflects the composition of the parcels, and the improvements and services provided, to fairly apportion the costs based on benefit to each parcel. The assessment roll states the net amount to be assessed upon all assessable lands within the District for FY 2011/2012, and describes each assessable lot or parcel of land within the District. These lots and parcels are more particularly described on the County assessment Roll, which is on file in the office of the San Bernardino County Assessor and by reference is made a part of this Engineer's Report Section 4 Annexations List the developments, which have annexed to the Street Lighting Maintenance District within calendar year 2010. Section 5 Assessment Diagrams Shows the boundaries of the areas to be annexed to the Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 and the general boundaries of the District. For details regarding the boundaries and dimensions of the respective parcels and subdivisions of land within the Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1, refer to the San Bernardino County Assessor's maps. 4 Section 1 -Description of Facilities: Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (SLD #1)) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located on arterial streets throughout the City. The facilities within this district, being located on arterial streets, have been determined to benefit the City as a whole on an equal basis and as such those costs associated with the maintenance and/or installation of the facilities is assigned to the citywide district. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on arterial streets and traffic signals on arterial streets within the rights-of-way or designated easements of streets dedicated to the City. Typically, street lights are installed by private development as a condition of a development project's approval. Traffic signals can be installed by development or as a City capital improvement project. Historically, the installation of street lights and traffic signals has not been funded with Street Light District funds, however, this is permitted under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972. Any new street lights in areas to be maintained by the District will become part of the active work program at such time as these new areas are annexed into the District. The normal process will be the dedication of the areas to the City, at which time a sufficient non-refundable deposit will be made by the developer to the City. This deposit will provide for costs of energizing and six months of ordinary and usual maintenance, operation and servicing of the street lights in each development at the time of initial operation of the lighting system. The costs will be based on the number and type of street lights and based on Southern California Edison Company's rate for street lights. Immediately upon the energizing of the street lights, those street lights will become a part of the work program of the district. 5 Section 2 -Estimate of Costs and Expenses: The majority of the budgeted operating costs for SLD #1 are for electric utility charges for the streetlights and traffic signals within the district. The projected costs to operate and maintain SLD #1 are as follows: District Budget Estimated 2011/12 Budget Personnel Services Regular Salaries $22,080.00 Part-time Salaries 12,700.00 Fringe Benefits 11.780.00 Subtotal Personnel $46,560.00 Operations and Maintenance Operations and Maintenance $9,150.00 Equipment Operations and Maintenance 500.00 Contract Services 0.00 Utilities Telephone Utilities 1,180.00 Electric Utilities 804,800.00 Assessment Administration 158,200.00 General Overhead 53,660.00 Interfund Allocation 16.290.00 Subtotal Operations and Maintenance $1,043,780.00 Capital Expenditures Capital Projects 0.00 Subtotal Capital Expenditures 0.00 Total District Expenditure Budget ~ $1,090,340.00 Total Estimated Assessment $777,540.00 Less Anticipated Delinquencies (43.280.00) Total Estimated Revenue $734,260.00 Plus Operating Reserve Fund Contribution 356.080.00 Total Expenditure Budget $1,090,340.00 Total Estimated Assessment $777,540.00 Total District EBU Count 43,755.76 Actual Assessment per EBU -Fiscal Year 2011/12 $17.77 Maximum Allowable Assessment per 8BU -Fiscal Year 2011/12 $17.77 6 Section 3 -Method of Assessment Apportionment: A. General The 1972 Act permits the establishments of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include construction, maintenance and servicing of public lights, landscaping and appurtenant facilities. The 1972 Act further requires that the cost of these improvements be levied according to benefit rather than assessed value: "The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements. " The formula used for calculating assessments in the District therefore reflects the composition of the parcels, and the improvements and services provided, to fairly apportion the costs based on benefit to each parcel. B. Assessment Methodology Equivalent Benefit Units: To assess benefits equitably, it is necessary to relate the different types of parcel improvements to each other. The Equivalent Benefit Unit method of apportionment uses the single-family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single family home equals one The Equivalent Benefit Unit (EBU). Every other land-use is converted to EBUs based on an assessment formula that equates the property's specific development status, type of development (land-use), and size of the property, as compared to asingle-family home (SFR). The EBU method of apportioning benefit is typically seen as the most appropriate and equitable assessment methodology for calculating benefit in districts formed under the 1972 Act, as the benefit to each parcel from improvements are apportioned as a function of land-use type, size and development. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land-use types to determine each parcel's EBU. 7 LAND-USE/EQUIVALENT BENEFIT UNITS Commercial 2.00 Vacant 2.00 Multi-Family 1.00 Single Family Residential 1.00 The following table summarizes the assessment rate for the district: Land Use Tvpe Single Family Multi-Family Commercial/Industrial C. Assessment Mu Acres Parcel Parcel Assessment Rate $17.77/SFD $17.77/DU $35.54/Acre All assessed lots or parcels within the District are listed on the assessment role, which is on file in the office of the City Clerk and the City Engineer, and hereby made a part of this Engineer's Report, by reference. The assessment roll states the net amount to be assessed upon all assessable lands within the District for Fiscal Year 2011/2012 and describes each assessable lot or parcel of land within the District. These lots and parcels are more particularly described on the County assessment Roll, which is on file in the office of the San Bernardino County Assessor and by reference is made a part of this Engineer's Report. EBU Value 8 Section 4 -Annexations: Calendar Year 2010 Annexations Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 PROJECT UNITS/ACRES TOTAL EBUs ANNEXATION DATE DRC2006-00580 1.76 3.52 5/19/2010 DRC2009-00586 1.06 2.12 12/01/2010 DRC2007-00247 2.00 4.00 12/15/2010 DRC2007-00247 1.70 3.40 12/15/2010 9 Section 5 -Assessment Diagram: io `,FJ` V •- y~1_ .y O ,' A~ W ~~ •~/~ •V J w y ny ua~!p!W ny uaneH ny esow~aH nV Pley!4o~V ny uewllaH 3S ue!lawe~ z~ i U a' C O N ny ~a;sayooa V) ~ ~. . N ~ C ~m c0 m 2 ny iCuay~ K N C _ J m ~ N N ~ L 3 f6 ~ O m O ~ Q ~ °' c t J rn y N m N N ® YI O o'' pN N O ny 3se3 in r c ny epuenn!;3 ny is;sayooa ny ua~!II!W ny uaneH ny esow~aH n`d Pley!4o~b' ~ ny uewllaH cn L L ~ ny p eRau!n a ny anal 9 m ~ ~ i - 3 r t o w ~ O Q E LL ~ 6 6 t / N .~ J ~ U ~ ^; y_r Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2011/2012 City of Rancho Cucamonga Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 (Local streets) ENGINEER'S REPORT AFFIDAVIT Rancho Cucamonga Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 (Local Streets) City of Rancho Cucamonga San Bernardino County, State of California This Report describes the District and all relevant zones therein including the improvements, budgets, parcels and assessments to be levied for fiscal year 2011/2012, as they existed at the time of the passage of the Resolution of Intention. Reference is hereby made to the San Bernardino County assessor's maps for a detailed description of the lines and dimensions of parcels within the District. The undersigned respectively submits the enclosed Report as directed by the City Council. Dated this 3rd dayast~11. Approved by: l/ teue ctor of Engineering Services/City Engineer TABLE OF CONTENTS OVERVIEW .........................................................................................4 SECTION 1 -DESCRIPTION OF FACILITIES ............................................5 SECTION 2 -ESTIMATE OF COSTS AND EXPENSES ..............................6 SECTION 3 -METHOD OF ASSESSMENT APPORTIONMENT ...................7 A. GENERAL ......................................................................7 B. ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY .......................................7 C. ASSESSMENT ................................................................8 SECTION 4 -ANNEXATIONS ................................................................9 SECTION 5 -ASSESSMENT DIAGRAMS ..............................................10 3 Overview The FY 2011/2012 Annual Report for Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 (Local streets) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Part 2, Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Street Lighting and Light Act of 1972). Section 1 Description of Facilities The plans and specifications for improvements maintained by the Assessment District consist of a general description of the nature, location, and the extent of the improvements proposed to be maintained, and are attached hereto. Section 2 Estimates of Cost and Expenses An estimate of the maintenance cost of the improvements, including incidental costs and expenses in connection therewith for FY 2011/2012, is set forth on the lists thereof, attached hereto. Section 3 Method of Assessment Apportionment Discuses the methodology used for calculating assessments in the District. The method reflects the composition of the parcels, and the improvements and services provided, to fairly apportion the costs based on benefit to each parcel. The assessment roll states the net amount to be assessed upon all assessable lands within the District for FY 2011/2012, and describes each assessable lot or parcel of land within the District. These lots and parcels are more particularly described on the County assessment Roll, which is on file in the office of the San Bernardino County Assessor and by reference is made a part of this Engineer's Report Section 4 Annexations List the developments, which have annexed to the Street Lighting Maintenance District within Calendar year 2010. Section 5 Assessment Diagrams Shows the boundaries of the areas to be annexed to the Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 and the general boundaries of the District. For details regarding the boundaries and dimensions of the respective parcels and subdivisions of land within the Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2, refer to the San Bernardino County Assessor's maps. 4 Section 1 -Description of Facilities: Street Light Maintenance District No. 2 (SLD #2) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located on local streets throughout the City but excluding those areas already in a local maintenance district. Generally, this area encompasses the residential area of the City west of Haven Avenue. It has been determined that the facilities in this district benefit this area of the City. This sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on local streets and traffic signals (or a portion thereof) on local streets generally west of Haven Avenue. Typically, street lights are installed by private development as a condition of a development project's approval. Traffic signals can be installed by development or as a City capital improvement project. Historically, the installation of street lights and traffic signals has not been funded with Street Light District funds, however, this is permitted under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972. Any new street lights in areas to be maintained by the District will become part of the active work program at such time as these new areas are annexed into the District. The normal process will be the dedication of the areas to the City, at which time a sufficient non-refundable deposit will be made by the developer to the City. This deposit will provide for costs of energizing and six months of ordinary and usual maintenance, operation and servicing of the street lights in each development at the time of initial operation of the lighting system. The costs will be based on the number and type of street lights and based on Southern California Edison Company's rate for street lights. Immediately upon energization of the street lights, those street lights will become a part of the work program of the district. 5 Section 2 -Estimate of Costs and Expenses: The majority of the budgeted operating costs for SLD #2 are for electric utility charges for the street lights and traffic signals within the district. The projected costs to operate and maintain SLD #2 are as follows: District Budget Estimated 2011/12 Budget Personnel Services ,Regular Salaries $0.00 Part-time Salaries 0.00 Fringe Benefits 0.00 Subtotal Personnel $0.00 Operations and Maintenance Operations and Maintenance $0.00 Equipment Operations and Maintenance 0.00 Contract Services 0.00 Utilities Telephone Utilities 0.00 Electric Utilities 268,670.00 Assessment Administration 38,440.00 General Overhead 24,870.00 Interfund Allocation 0.00 Subtotal Operations and Maintenance $331,980.00 Capital Expenditures Capital Proieds 0.00 Subtotal Capital Expenditures 0.00 Total District Expenditure Budget ~ $331,980.00 Total Estimated Assessment $384,380.00 Less Anticipated Delinquencies (32.400.00) Total Estimated Revenue $331,980.00 Plus Operating Reserve Fund Contribution 0.00 Total Expenditure Budget $331,980.00 Total Estimated Assessment $364,430.00 Total District EBU Count 9116.32 Actual Assessment per EBU -Fiscal Year 2011/12 $39.97 Maximum Allowable Assessment er EBU -Fiscal Year 2011/12 $39.97 6 Section 3 -Method of Assessment Apportionment: A. General The 1972 Act permits the establishments of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include construction, maintenance and servicing of public lights, landscaping and appurtenant facilities. The 1972 Act further requires that the cost of these improvements be levied according to benefit rather than assessed value: "The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements. " The formula used for calculating assessments in the District therefore reflects the composition of the parcels, and the improvements and services provided, to fairly apportion the costs based on benefit to each parcel. B. Assessment Methodology Equivalent Benefit Units: To assess benefits equitably, it is necessary to relate the different types of parcel improvements to each other. The Equivalent Benefit Unit method of apportionment uses the single-family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single family home equals one The Equivalent Benefit Unit (EBU). Every other land-use is converted to EBU's based on an assessment formula that equates the property's specific development status, type of development (land-use), and size of the property, as compared to asingle-family home (SFR). The EBU method of apportioning benefit is typically seen as the most appropriate and equitable assessment methodology for calculating benefit in districts formed under the 1972 Act, as the benefit to each parcel from improvements are apportioned as a function of land-use type, size and development. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land-use types to determine each parcel's EBU. LAND-USE/EQUIVALENT BENEFIT UNITS Property Type EBU Value Multiplier Commercial 2.00 Acres Vacant 2.00 Acres Multi-Family 1.00 Unit Single Family Residential 1.00 Unit 7 The following table summarizes the assessment rate for the district: Land Use Type Single Family Multi-Family Commercial/Industrial Assessment Rate $39.97/SFD $39.97/DU $79.94/Acre C. Assessment All assessed lots or parcels within the District are listed on the assessment role, which is on file in the office of the City Clerk and the City Engineer, and hereby made a part of this Engineer's Report, by reference. The assessment roll states the net amount to be assessed upon all assessable lands within the District for Fiscal Year 2011/2012, and describes each assessable lot or parcel of land within the District. These lots and parcels are more particularly described on the County assessment Roll, which is on file in the office of the San Bernardino County Assessor and by reference is made a part of this Engineer's Report. 8 Section 4 -Annexations: There are no annexations for Calendar Year 2010. Section 5 -Assessment Diagram: ~o N +.+ V •_ N yr ,AA YI J O ¢ ~ Q ~ J ® ~ U c il ~ o ~ ~ ~~ ny tiiay~ 01 y ~ J ti r ~ ~. ; .._.._.._.._ ~ O / •y j J N ) N A ' _ ~ \ C J m ~ ' ~ O Y.+ ~ ~ L a 3 o G - ~ m ll Q 1 j ' _.. nb' lse3 in .~ i ny epuemg3 ny epueM!33 r J ~ - - ~r ~ ~ ~8 ~aa~~ ~e4 •_.. _.._.._u_.._. _..' ~ w ny ~alsayooa ~ - ny ~alsayoob ~ ~ . ,... ny ua~!11!W f._.._.._.._.._,.: ~ ny ua~!II!W ny uaneH ny uaneH ny esow~aH ny esow~aH nV Pley!4oi~i nV PIeQ!4oiV ny uew!!aH ~ ny uewllaH ~ r r ~ ny p~eRau !n 3S ue!lawe~ gs~°EF•S@~d2 € €- E ~ .O .$$_~g t ~F E.i 1 Y fr $ ~ ~ ~ C _ m 0 ' nyana~ U7 p ¢eE ~gfr 9s'p Et ;Bn ° L J - _ 3 L x Eg~ a ~e~y E$ € Z `€~~ E E g T .0 C W ~nS ~4 4ippy ~.[ EP6e°ag de~E m ~a ~ ~ ~ 6 Y~~{f ' a E`BS EYEI', ~= a ?43we- EPnsa °~4. {~~~ p Q~E ¢ C ~? 7 H~ E Eu e ` (e~ . U G ~ E $ ~S~o&E~@a~FP Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2011/2012 City of Rancho Cucamonga Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3 (Victoria Planned Community) ENGINEER'S REPORT AFFIDAVIT Rancho Cucamonga Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3 (Victoria Planned Community) City of Rancho Cucamonga San Bernardino County, State of California This Report describes the District and all relevant zones therein including the improvements, budgets, parcels and assessments to be levied for fiscal year 2011/2012, as they existed at the time of the passage of the Resolution of Intention. Reference is hereby made to the San Bernardino County assessor's maps fora detailed description of the lines and dimensions of parcels within the District. The undersigned respectively submits the enclosed Report as directed by the City Council. Dated this 3rd day of Approved by: of Engineering Services/City Engineer 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS OVERVIEW .........................................................................................4 SECTION 1 -DESCRIPTION OF FACILITIES ............................................5 SECTION 2 -ESTIMATE OF COSTS AND EXPENSES ..............................6 SECTION 3 -METHOD OF ASSESSMENT APPORTIONMENT ...................7 A. GENERAL ......................................................................7 B. ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY .......................................7 C. ASSESSMENT ................................................................8 SECTION 4 -ANNEXATIONS ................................................................9 SECTION 5 -ASSESSMENT DIAGRAMS ..............................................10 3 Overview The FY 2011/2012 Annual Report for Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3 (Victoria Planned Community) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Part 2, Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Street Lighting and Light Act of 1972). Section 1 Description of Facilities The plans and specifications for improvements maintained by the Assessment District consist of a general description of the nature, location, and the extent of the improvements proposed to be maintained, and are attached hereto. Section 2 Estimates of Cost and Expenses An estimate of the maintenance cost of the improvements, including incidental costs and expenses in connection therewith for FY 2011/2012, is set forth on the lists thereof, attached hereto. Section 3 Method of Assessment Apportionment Discuses the methodology used for calculating assessments in the District. The method reflects the composition of the parcels, and the improvements and services provided, to fairly apportion the costs based on benefit to each parcel. The assessment roll states the net amount to be assessed upon all assessable lands within the District for FY 2011/2012, and describes each assessable lot or parcel of land within the District. These lots and parcels are more particularly described on the County assessment Roll, which is on file in the office of the San Bernardino County Assessor and by reference is made a part of this Engineer's Report Section 4 Annexations List the developments, which have annexed to the Street Lighting Maintenance District within Calendar year 2010. Section 5 Assessment Diagrams Shows the boundaries of the areas to be annexed to the Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3 and the general boundaries of the District. For details regarding the boundaries and dimensions of the respective parcels and subdivisions of land within the Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3, refer to the San Bernardino County Assessor's maps. 4 Section 1 -Description of Facilities: Street Light Maintenance District No. 3 (SLD #3) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located within the Victoria Planned Community. Generally, this area encompasses the area of the City east of Deer Creek Channel, south of Highland Avenue, north of Base Line Road, and west of Etiwanda Avenue. It has been determined that the facilities in this district benefit the properties within this area of the City. This sites maintained by the district consist of streetlights on local streets and traffic signals (or a portion thereof) on local streets within the Victoria Planned Community. Typically, street lights are installed by private development as a condition of a development project's approval. Traffic signals can be installed by development or as a City capital improvement project. Historically, the installation of street lights and traffic signals has not been funded with Street Light District funds, however, this is permitted under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972. Any new street lights in areas to be maintained by the District will become part of the active work program at such time as these new areas are annexed into the District. The normal process will be the dedication of the areas to the City, at which time a sufficient non-refundable deposit will be made by the developer to the City. This deposit will provide for costs of energizing and six months of ordinary and usual maintenance, operation and servicing of the street lights in each development at the time of initial operation of the lighting system. The costs will be based on the number and type of street lights and based on Southern California Edison Company's rate for street lights. Immediately upon energization of the street lights, those street lights will become a part of the work program of the district 5 Section 2 -Estimate of Costs and Expenses: The majority of the budgeted operating costs for SLD #3 are for electric utility charges for the street lights and traffic signals within the district. The projected costs to operate and maintain SLD #3 are as follows: District Budget Estimated 2011/12 Budget Personnel Services Regular Salaries $22,080.00 Part-time Salaries 12,700.00 Fringe Benefits 11.780.00 Subtotal Personnel $46,560.00 Operations and Maintenance Operations and Maintenance $10,150.00 Equipment Operations and Maintenance 0.00 Contract Services 0.00 Utilities Telephone Utilities 0.00 Electric Utilities 294,920.00 Assessment Administration 35,180.00 General Overhead _ 24,130.00 Interfund Allocation 16.290.00 Subtotal Operations and Maintenance $380,670.00 Capital Expenditures Caoital Proieds 0.00 Subtotal Capital Expenditures 0.00 Total District Expenditure Budget ~ $427,230.00 Total Estimated Assessment $349,200.00 Less Anticipated Delinquencies {11.110.00) Total Estimated Revenue $338,100.00 Plus Operating Reserve Fund Contribution 89.130.00 Total Expenditure Budget $427,230.00 Total Estimated Assessment $349,200.00 Total District EBU Count 7,406.16 Actual Assessment per EBU -Fiscal Year 2011/12 $47.15 Maximum Allowable Assessment er EBU -Fiscal Year 2011/12 $47.15 6 Section 3 -Method of Assessment Apportionment: A. General The 1972 Act permits the establishments of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include construction, maintenance and servicing of public lights, landscaping and appurtenant facilities. The 1972 Act further requires that the cost of these improvements be levied according to benefit rather than assessed value: "The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements. " The formula used for calculating assessments in the District therefore reflects the composition of the parcels, and the improvements and services provided, to fairly apportion the costs based on benefit to each parcel. B. Assessment Methodology Equivalent Benefit Units: To assess benefits equitably, it is necessary to relate the different types of parcel improvements to each other. The Equivalent Benefit Unit method of apportionment uses the single-family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single family home equals one The Equivalent Benefit Unit (EBU). Every other land-use is converted to EBU's based on an assessment formula that equates the property's specific development status, type of development (land-use), and size of the property, as compared to asingle-family home (SFR). The EBU method of apportioning benefit is typically seen as the most appropriate and equitable assessment methodology for calculating benefit in districts formed under the 1972 Act, as the benefit to each parcel from improvements are apportioned as a function of land-use type, size and development. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land-use types to determine each parcel's EBU. LAND-USE/EQUIVALENT BENEFIT UNITS EBU Value Multiplier Commercial 2.00 Vacant 2.00 Single Family Residential 1.00 Multi-Family Residential 1.00 Acres Parcel Parcel 7 The following table summarizes the assessment rate for the district: Land Use Tvpe Single Family Multi-Family Commercial/Industrial Assessment Rate $47.15/SFD $47.15/DU $94.30/Acre C. Assessment All assessed lots or parcels within the District are listed on the assessment role, which is on file in the office of the City Clerk and the City Engineer, and hereby made a part of this Engineer's Report, by reference. The assessment roll states the net amount to be assessed upon all assessable lands within the District for Fiscal Year 2011/2012, and describes each assessable lot or parcel of land within the District. These lots and parcels are more particularly described on the County assessment Roll, which is on file in the office of the San Bernardino County Assessor and by reference is made a part of this Engineer's Report. 8 Section 4 -Annexations: There are no annexations for Calendar Year 2010 Section 5 -Assessment Diagram: io ch ~ ~~ v ~~ N fq J (., ~ c ~ I] C U N ~ ~`~- ny ~(JJa4~ rn ~' S ~ ~ ~ V .._.._.._.._ ~ J 1.r o ~ j ~ N ~ ~ 1 C J _ m ~ O O +r j ~ m m ~ 0 3 0 '~ E LL Q 1 j ._.._.._.._..~.._.._.._.._.._• ~ nH ise3 vJ E L `I.r E d i ny epuenn!33 -~'-"- '~ ny epueMg3 ~_ i ~ J i jj f ,w i ~ ~e ~aaJ~ ~eQ . i .._.. ......... ...E y ny Jalsayooa ! i ny Jalsayaoa •~.. i -- ny ua~!II!W f._.._.._.._..- _- ny ua>I!II!W i i i i ny uaneH ~ i - i my uaneH i ny esowJaH i - ~ny esowJaH i = nV PIeQ!4oJV i j^d Pley!4oJV ny uewllaH i ~.•~" ~ ny uewllaH " w i ~r L L ~ ny p eRau !n ig uepawe~ j - i ..~ ~.~;7 ~:._ i Y=pttp'4 PP8fit ~~~~ ej ~ g 9 i ~ i ~ , y { p '• N • • gg g g B b ti ~..~ c m ~ (n ' b Egj E~¢[ $R~ g~b ~ c m ~ Q e ~ m ~~6E~ ~e~ ~~ ° ~ S In g g ° ~ ~ b = '3 ~~ ~ ~ p g a S dg E3 i~ 'e 4~yy °rs~B~as°'~ a{@~~ ~aAb 3$a s~ ~` L g tg~a>ii3ic€~ $ U ~tdofli~@<l~e Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2011/2012 City of Rancho Cucamonga Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 4 (Terra Vista Planned Community) ENGINEER'S REPORT AFFIDAVIT Rancho Cucamonga Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 4 (Terra Vista Planned Community) City of Rancho Cucamonga San Bernardino County, State of California This Report describes the District and all relevant zones therein including the improvements, budgets, parcels and assessments to be levied for fiscal year 2011/2012, as they existed at the time of the passage of the Resolution of Intention. Reference is hereby made to the San Bernardino County assessor's maps for a detailed description of the lines and dimensions of parcels within the District. The undersigned respectively submits the enclosed Report as directed by the City Council. Dated this 3rd day of~agnst~~11. Approved by: of Engineering Services/City Engineer II TABLE OF CONTENTS OVERVIEW .........................................................................................4 SECTION 1 -DESCRIPTION OF FACILITIES ............................................5 SECTION 2 -ESTIMATE OF COSTS AND EXPENSES ..............................6 SECTION 3 -METHOD OF ASSESSMENT APPORTIONMENT ...................7 A. GENERAL ......................................................................7 B. ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY .......................................7 C. ASSESSMENT ................................................................8 SECTION 4 -ANNEXATIONS ................................................................9 SECTION 5 -ASSESSMENT DIAGRAMS ..............................................10 III Overview The FY 2011/2012 Annual Report for Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 4 (Terra Vista Planned Community) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Part 2, Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Street Lighting and Light Act of 1972). Section 1 Description of Facilities The plans and specifications for improvements maintained by the Assessment District consist of a general description of the nature, location, and the extent of the improvements proposed to be maintained, and are attached hereto. Section 2 Estimates of Cost and Expenses An estimate of the maintenance cost of the improvements, including incidental costs and expenses in connection therewith for FY 2011/2012, is set forth on the lists thereof, attached hereto. Section 3 Method of Assessment Apportionment Discuses the methodology used for calculating assessments in the District. The method reflects the composition of the parcels, and the improvements and services provided, to fairly apportion the costs based on benefit to each parcel. The assessment roll states the net amount to be assessed upon all assessable lands within the District for FY 2011/2012, and describes each assessable lot or parcel of land within the District. These lots and parcels are more particularly described on the County assessment Roll, which is on file in the office of the San Bernardino County Assessor and by reference is made a part of this Engineer's Report Section 4 Annexations List the developments, which have annexed to the Street Lighting Maintenance District within Calendar year 2010. Section.5 Assessment Diagrams Shows the boundaries of the areas to be annexed to the Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 4 and the general boundaries of the District. For details regarding the boundaries and dimensions of the respective parcels and subdivisions of land within the Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 4, refer to the San Bernardino County Assessor's maps. Section 1 -Description of Facilities: Street Light Maintenance District No. 4 (SLD #4) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located within the Terra Vista Planned Community. Generally, this area encompasses the residential area of the City east of Haven Avenue, south of Base Line Road, north of Foothill Boulevard and west of Rochester Avenue. It has been determined that the facilities in this district benefit the properties within this area of the City. This sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on local streets and traffic signals (or a portion thereof) on local streets within the Terra Vista Planned Community. Typically, street lights are installed by private development as a condition of a development project's approval. Traffic signals can be installed by development or as a City capital improvement project. Historically, the installation of street lights and traffic signals has not been funded with Street Light District funds; however, this is permitted under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972. Any new street lights in areas to be maintained by the District will become part of the active work program at such time as these new areas are annexed into the District. The normal process will be the dedication of the areas to the City, at which time a sufficient non-refundable deposit will be made by the developer to the City. This deposit will provide for costs of energizing and six months of ordinary and usual maintenance, operation and servicing of the street lights in each development at the time of initial operation of the lighting system. The costs will be based on the number and type of street lights and based on Southern California Edison Company's rate for street lights. Immediately upon energization of the street lights, those street lights will become a part of the work program of the district street lights, those street lights will become a part of the work program of the district. 5 Section 2 -Estimate of Costs and Expenses: The majority of the budgeted operating costs for SLD #4 are for electric utility charges for the street lights and traffic signals within the district. The projected costs to operate and maintain SLD #4 are as follows: District Budget Estimated 2011/12 Budget Personnel Services Regular Salaries $22,080.00 Part-time Salaries 12,700.00 Fringe Benefits 11.780.00 Subtotal Personnel $46,560.00 Operations and Maintenance Operations and Maintenance $5,150.00 Equipment Operations and Maintenance 500.00 Contract Services 0.00 Utilities Telephone Utilities 0.00 Electric Utilities 141,160.00 Assessment Administration 22,970.00 General Overhead 11,110.00 Interfund Allocation 0.00 Subtotal Operations and Maintenance $180,890.00 Capital Expenditures Capital Proieds 0.00 Subtotal Capital Expenditures 0.00 Total District Expenditure Budget ~ $227,450.00 Total Estimated Assessment $156,730.00 Plus Anticipated Delinquencies 8 Interest 3.720.00 Total Estimated Revenue $160,450.00 Plus Operating Reserve Fund Contribution 67.000.00 Total Expenditure Budget $227,450.00 Total Estimated Assessment $156,730.00 Total District EBU Count 5,412.06 Aclual Assessment per EBU -Fiscal Year 2011/12 $28.96 Maximum Allowable Assessment cr BBU -Fiscal Year 2011/12 $28.96 6 Section 3 -Method of Assessment Apportionment: A. General The 1972 Act permits the establishments of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include construction, maintenance and servicing of public lights, landscaping and appurtenant facilities. The 1972 Act further requires that the cost of these improvements be levied according to benefit rather than assessed value: "The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements. " The formula used for calculating assessments in the District therefore reflects the composition of the parcels, and the improvements and services provided, to fairly apportion the costs based on benefit to each parcel. B. Assessment Methodology Equivalent Dwelling Units: To assess benefits equitably, it is necessary to relate the different types of parcel improvements to each other. The Equivalent Benefit Unit method of apportionment uses the single-family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single family home equals one The Equivalent Benefit Unit (EBU). Every other land-use is converted to EBU's based on an assessment formula that equates the property's specific development status, type of development (land-use), and size of the property, as compared to asingle-family home (SFR). The EBU method of apportioning benefit is typically seen as the most appropriate and equitable assessment methodology for calculating benefit in districts formed under the 1972 Act, as the benefit to each parcel from improvements are apportioned as a function of land-use type, size and development. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land-use types to determine each parcel's EBU. LAND-USE/EQUIVALENT BENEFIT UNITS Property Type EBU Value Multiplier Commercial 2.00 Acres Vacant 2.00 Acres Multi-Family 0.5 Unit Single Family Residential 1.00 Parcel 7 The following table summarizes the assessment rate for the district: Land Use Tyae Single Family Multi-Family Commercial/Industrial Assessment Rate $28.96/SFD $14.48/DU $57.92/Acre C. Assessment All assessed lots or parcels within the District are listed on the assessment role, which is on file in the office of the City Clerk and the City Engineer, and hereby made a part of this Engineer's Report, by reference. The assessment roll states the net amount to be assessed upon all assessable lands within the District for Fiscal Year 2011/2012 and describes each assessable lot or parcel of land within the District. These lots and parcels are more particularly described on the County assessment Roll, which is on file in the office of the San Bernardino County Assessor and by reference is made a part of this Engineer's Report. Section 4 -Annexations: There are no annexations for Calendar year 2010. Section 5 -Assessment Diagram: io ~ ~ ~~ v . mo N , w ,= ] J ~ a 0 .a z' c 1 ~ () (p ~ 0 ~ i~ ny /~~ay~ ~ ^~ S (~ 7 ~ ti r .._.._.._.. ~ . J o d N. N C_ 1 J d ~ m ~ o ~ m o o ~ ~ ~ 1 LL Q 1 i - .-..-..-..-..~..-..- -..-..-i nH ~se3 in C ® L 1 ~~1 1 7 .C i ny epuenn!;3 _.._.._.. ~ ny epueM!i3 .~ ~ - i J i ~.. i - ~ ~e ~aa~~ ea ' i ~ ._.._.._.._.._.._.._.y y ny ~a;sayooa !- ny ~a;sayooa ,~..~ 1 ~ ' ~ ny ua~!p!W r:_.._.._.._..- - -` -- - ny ua~!II!W i~ i i i ! ny uaneH ! i -iny uaneH j s 1 ny esow~aH i ! ny esow~aH nV PIe4!4o~t/ ~ jnb' PIe4!4oib' ! ~ ny uewllaH i - -- ~.•~"~ ny uewllaH 1 i fo ~ ! ny P~ef(au!q 3S ue!lawe~ ' - - J ' 1 ~:l L ! g `I:~ipgee id~ Y_44~c~E ! ^.._..~ ••~ • ~ 1 frgfr . _ ny anal 96@^- gg 3 ^~' 1 y •~.. .I• N ~ ~_ J m _ ~ g p W d~_€ ~II ~~~~i~EY~s~. ' ~ ~ N p O ~ ~ gf e4~4 &3 ~ c d7 ~i Q a~ @ .c3=5:$~a=~i ` ~ l0 gg ~'Paa £4 ~~a 8 N (0 5 ~52~3~ €j6 2 m ef d4~1 ~~i~geE 3 2 ~ Ems., LFS¢YZaxa a.f~~~ 9fa~$ VO ~~ a t~E!$ SBo2a ~ U ' ~ ~$~L'ffg~FH91€ Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2011/2012 City of Rancho Cucamonga Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 5 (Caryn Community) ENGINEER'S REPORT AFFIDAVIT Rancho Cucamonga Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 5 (Caryn Community) City of Rancho Cucamonga San Bernardino County, State of California This Report describes the District and all relevant sections therein including the improvements, budgets, parcels and assessments to be levied for fiscal year 2010/2012, as they existed at the time of the passage of the Resolution of Intention. Reference is hereby made to the San Bernardino County assessor's maps for a detailed description of the lines and dimensions of parcels within the District. The undersigned respectively submits the enclosed Report as directed by the City Council. Dated this 3rd day of Approved by: ~ .~~ of Engineering Services/City Engineer 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS OVERVIEW .........................................................................................4 SECTION 1 -DESCRIPTION OF FACILITIES ............................................5 SECTION 2 -ESTIMATE OF COSTS AND EXPENSES ..............................6 SECTION 3 -METHOD OF ASSESSMENT APPORTIONMENT ...................7 A. GENERAL ......................................................................7 B. ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY .......................................7 C. ASSESSMENT ................................................................8 SECTION 4 -ANNEXATIONS ................................................................9 SECTION 5 -ASSESSMENT DIAGRAMS ..............................................10 3 Overview The FY 2011/2012 Annual Report for Street (Caryn Community) is prepared in compliance Chapter 1, Part 2, Division 15 of the Streets an (Street Lighting and Light Act of 1972). Lighting Maintenance District No. 5 with the requirements of Article 4, d Highways Code, State of California Section 1 Description of Facilities The plans and specifications for improvements maintained by the Assessment District consist of a general description of the nature, location, and the extent of the improvements proposed to be maintained, and are attached hereto. Section 2 Estimates of Cost and Expenses An estimate of the maintenance cost of the improvements, including incidental costs and expenses in connection therewith for FY 2011/2012, is set forth on the lists thereof, attached hereto. Section 3 Method of Assessment Apportionment Discuses the methodology used for calculating assessments in the District. The method reflects the composition of the parcels, and the improvements and services provided, to fairly apportion the costs based on benefit to each parcel. The assessment roll states the net amount to be assessed upon all assessable lands within the District for FY 2011/2012, and describes each assessable lot or parcel of land within the District. These lots and parcels are more particularly described on the County assessment Roll, which is on file in the office of the San Bernardino County Assessor and by reference is made a part of this Engineer's Report Section 4 Annexations List the developments, which have annexed to the Street Lighting Maintenance District within Calendar year 2010. Section 5 Assessment Diagrams Shows the boundaries of the areas to be annexed to the Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 5 and the general boundaries of the District. For details regarding the boundaries and dimensions of the respective parcels and subdivisions of land within the Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 5, refer to the San Bernardino County Assessor's maps. Section 1 -Description of Facilities: Street Light Maintenance District No. 5 (SLD #5) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located within the Caryn Planned Community. Generally, this area encompasses the area of the City east of Milliken Avenue, south of Banyan Street, north of Highland Avenue and west of Rochester Avenue. It has been determined that the facilities in this district benefit the properties within this area of the City. This sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on local streets and traffic signals (or a portion thereof) on local streets within the Caryn Planned Community. Typically, street lights are installed by private development as a condition of a development project's approval. Traffic signals can be installed by development or as a City capital improvement project. Historically, the installation of street lights and traffic signals has not been funded with Street Light District funds; however, this is permitted under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972. Any new street lights in areas to be maintained by the District will become part of the active work program at such time as these new areas are annexed into the District. The normal process will be the dedication of the areas to the City, at which time a sufficient non-refundable deposit will be made by the developer to the City. This deposit will provide for costs of energizing and six months of ordinary and usual maintenance, operation and servicing of the street lights in each development at the time of initial operation of the lighting system. The costs will be based on the number and type of street lights and based on Southern California Edison Company's rate for street lights. Immediately upon energization of the street lights, those street lights will become a part of the work program of the district. 5 Section 2 -Estimate of Costs and Expenses: The majority of the budgeted operating costs for SLD #5 are for electric utility charges for the street lights and traffic signals within the district. The projected costs to operate and maintain SLD #5 are as follows: District Budget Estimated 2011/12 Budget Personnel Services Regular Salaries $6.900.00 Part-time Salaries D.OD Fringe Benefits 3.240.00 Subtotal Personnel $10,140.00 Operations and Maintenance Operations and Maintenance $7,650.00 Equipment Operations and Maintenance 0.00 Contract Services 0.00 Utilities Telephone Utilities 0.00 Electric Utilities 54,900.00 Assessment Administration 7,020.00 General Overhead 3,100.00 Interfund Allocation 0.00 Subtotal Operations and Maintenance $72,670.00 Capital Expenditures Caoital Projects 0.00 Subtotal Capital Expenditures 0.00 Total District Expenditure Budget ~ $82,810.00 Total Estimated Assessment $44,150.00 Less Anticipated Delinquencies 1 71.80.00) Total Estimated Revenue $42,370.00 Plus Operating Reserve Fund Contribution 40.440.00 Total Expenditure Budget $82,810.00 Total Estimated Assessment $44,150.00 Total District EBU Count 1276 Actual Assessment per EBU -Fiscal Year 2011/12 $34.60 Maximum Allowable Assessment er EBU-Fiscal Year 2011/12 $34.60 6 Section 3 -Method of Assessment Apportionment: A. General The 1972 Act permits the establishments of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include construction, maintenance and servicing of public lights, landscaping and appurtenant facilities. The 1972 Act further requires that the cost of these improvements be levied according to benefit rather than assessed value: "The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which faidy distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements. " The formula used for calculating assessments in the District therefore reflects the composition of the parcels, and the improvements and services provided, to fairly apportion the costs based on benefit to each parcel. B. Assessment Methodology Equivalent Benefit Units: To assess benefits equitably, it is necessary to relate the different types of parcel improvements to each other. The Equivalent Benefit Unit method of apportionment uses the single-family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single family home equals one The Equivalent Benefit Unit (EBU). Every other land-use is converted to EBU's based on an assessment formula that equates the property's specific development status, type of development (land-use), and size of the property, as compared to asingle-family home (SFR). The EBU method of apportioning benefit is typically seen as the most appropriate and equitable assessment methodology for calculating benefit in districts formed under the 1972 Act, as the benefit to each parcel from improvements are apportioned as a function of land-use type, size and development. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land-use types to determine each parcel's EBU. LAND-USE/EQUIVALENT BENEFIT UNITS EBU Value Multiplier Single Family Residential 1.00 Multi-Family Residential 1.00 Commercial/Industrial 2.00 Vacant 2.00 Unit Unit Acres Acres The following table summarizes the assessment rate for the district: Land Use Type Assessment Rate Single Family $34.60/SFD C. Assessment All assessed lots or parcels within the District are listed on the assessment role, which is on file in the office of the City Clerk and the City Engineer, and hereby made a part of this Engineer's Report, by reference. The assessment roll states the net amount to be assessed upon all assessable lands within the District for Fiscal Year 2011/2012, and describes each assessable lot or parcel of land within the District. These lots and parcels are more particularly described on the County assessment Roll, which is on file in the office of the San Bernardino County Assessor and by reference is made a part of this Engineer's Report. Section 4 -Annexations: There are no annexations for Calendar Year 2010. 9 Section 5 -Assessment Diagram: ~o ,A _+ N N +~ ~ to V A~ N i `F ~ IA Y! J Q c ~ I _ ~ ~ ~ i~ - ny lwa4~ C1 ~~ 4 '' ~ V C J ti r .._.._.._.. o / i ~ N ~ C ~ ; - N m O ~ j ~ ~ o 3 a A~ ~ m LL Q 1 -_ ._ _ _.._.._.._ .. i ~.._.._.._.._.._~ i nV 1se3 in G i ® t ~ Yr ~ .L i ny epuenn!;3 _.._.._. ny epuenn!13 A~ i ~ (- , - -~ -- J - ~ ; ~ ~e ~aal~ lea .._.. nyla;sayoob - -- - y nyla;sayooa ~.. ~ i - ny ua~!II!W ~._.._.._.._.._ ._ -- ~~-- -~ ny ua~!II!W ny uaneH ~ -- i ny uaneH i ny esowlaH i--- - - - ny esowlaH i nH PIe4!yo1V i j ny PIe4!yolb' ny uewllaH i -- i ~•r' ~ ny uewllaH i r" = L ~ i _ fi ~ ~ ~ ny plel~au!n 3S ue!lawe~ ~ -- - - ~ t.._..! .•~ ~ ~~.._. ~'Y. _.._~ _ _~ At/ aA01~ spa sfrEe$y ~: as'€€s 8 a~ cs g Y.._.. •~• • (n ~ L 0 O7 §oF3c ~ E~E'vas` TY_.. _.. .._.._ -p ~ y j f0 O Q S @93~gi :: Aes~g @E>~ ~ C m LL 33~Gi ~A~~~F4 "6 g P ~6a e~A°E~Fn C N m ! fiC@~rz'FLS€8~ 2 6~~AZ~~P{~i$~' 34e3 Z8 [ e ` so E ° _ g~dAfP~4:s 3a 9g4~ ^;Q3@g ~s gas Aas @:~ g U €Li: &?~Psc:e A Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2011/2012 City of Rancho Cucamonga Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 (Commercial/Industrial) ENGINEER'S REPORT AFFIDAVIT Rancho Cucamonga Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 (Commercial/Industrial) City of Rancho Cucamonga San Bernardino County, State of California This Report describes the District and all relevant zones therein including the improvements, budgets, parcels and assessments to be levied for fiscal year 2011/2012 as they existed at the time of the passage of the Resolution of Intention. Reference is hereby made to the San Bernardino County assessor's maps for a detailed description of the lines and dimensions of parcels within the District. The undersigned respectively submits the enclosed Report as directed by the City Council. Dated this 3rd day of~uaust. 2011. Approved Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer TABLE OF CONTENTS OVERVIEW .........................................................................................4 SECTION 1 -DESCRIPTION OF FACILITIES ............................................5 SECTION 2 -ESTIMATE OF COSTS AND EXPENSES ..............................6 SECTION 3 -METHOD OF ASSESSMENT APPORTIONMENT ...................7 A. GENERAL ......................................................................7 B. ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY .......................................7 C. ASSESSMENT ................................................................8 SECTION 4 -ANNEXATIONS ................................................................9 SECTION 5 -ASSESSMENT DIAGRAMS ..............................................10 3 Overview The FY 2011/2012 Annual Report for Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 (Commercial/Industrial) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Part 2, Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Street Lighting and Light Act of 1972). Section 1 Description of Facilities The plans and specifications for improvements maintained by the Assessment District consist of a general description of the nature, location, and the extent of the improvements proposed to be maintained, and are attached hereto. Section 2 Estimates of Cost and Expenses An estimate of the maintenance cost of the improvements, including incidental costs and expenses in connection therewith for FY 2011/2012, is set forth on the lists thereof, attached hereto. Section 3 Method of Assessment Apportionment Discuses the methodology used for calculating assessments in the District. The method reflects the composition of the parcels, and the improvements and services provided, to fairly apportion the costs based on benefit.to each parcel. The assessment roll states the net amount to be assessed upon all assessable lands within the District for FY 2011/2012, and describes each assessable lot or parcel of land within the District. These lots and parcels are more particularly described on the County assessment Roll, which is on file in the office of the San Bernardino County Assessor and by reference is made a part of this Engineer's Report Section 4 Annexations List the developments, which have annexed to the Street Lighting Maintenance District within Calendar year 2010. Section 5 Assessment Diagrams Shows the boundaries of the areas to be annexed to the Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 and the general boundaries of the District. For details regarding the boundaries and dimensions of the respective parcels and subdivisions of land within the Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6, refer to the San Bernardino County Assessor's maps. 4 Section 1 -Description of Facilities: Street Light Maintenance District No. 6 (SLD #6) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located on commercial and industrial streets throughout the City but excluding those areas already in a local maintenance district. Generally, this area encompasses the industrial area of the City south of Foothill Boulevard. It has been determined that the facilities in this district benefit the properties within this area of the City. This sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on industrial or commercial streets and traffic signals (or a portion thereof) on industrial or commercial streets generally south of Foothill Boulevard. Typically, street lights are installed by private development as a condition of a development project's approval. Traffic signals can be installed by development or as a City capital improvement project. Historically, the installation of street lights and traffic signals has not been funded with Street Light District funds; however, this is permitted under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972. Any new street lights in areas to be maintained by the District will become part of the active work program at such time as these new areas are annexed into the District. The normal process will be the dedication of the areas to the City, at which time a sufficient non-refundable deposit will be made by the developer to the City. This deposit will provide for costs of energizing and six months of ordinary and usual maintenance, operation and servicing of the street lights in each development at the time of initial operation of the lighting system. The costs will be based on the number and type of street lights and based on Southern California Edison Company's rate for street lights. Immediately upon energization of the street lights, those street lights will become a part of the work program of the district 5 Section 2 -Estimate of Costs and Expenses: The majority of the budgeted operating costs for SLD #6 are for electric utility charges for the street lights and traffic signals within the district. The projected costs to operate and maintain SLD #6 are as follows: District Budget Estimated 2011/12 Budget Personnel Services Regular Salaries $22,080.00 Part-time Salaries 12,700.00 Fringe Benefits 11.780.00 Subtotal Personnel $46,560.00 Operations and Maintenance Operations and Maintenance $7,150.00 Equipment Operations and Maintenance 400.00 Contract Services 0.00 Utilities Telephone Utilities 0.00 Electric Utilities 94,790.00 Assessment Administration 5,490.00 General Overhead 8,990.00 Interfund Allocation 0.00 Subtotal Operations and Maintenance $116,820.00 Capital Expenditures Capital Projects 0.00 Subtotal Capital Expenditures 0.00 Total District Expenditure Budget ~ $163,380.00 Total Estimated Assessment $127,710.00 Less Anticipated Delinquencies 2 0{ 30.00) Total Estimated Revenue $125,200.00 Plus Operating Reserve Fund Contribution 38.180.00 Total Expenditure Budget $163,380.00 Total Estimated Assessment $127,710.00 Total District EBU Count 2,484.60 Actual Assessment per Acre -Fiscal Year 2011 /12 $51.40 Maximum Allowable Assessment er Acre-Fiscal Year 2011/12 $51.40 6 Section 3 -Method of Assessment Apportionment: A. General The 1972 Act permits the establishments of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include construction, maintenance and servicing of public lights, landscaping and appurtenant facilities. The 1972 Act further requires that the cost of these improvements be levied according to benefit rather than assessed value: "The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements. " The formula used for calculating assessments in the District therefore reflects the composition of the parcels, and the improvements and services provided, to fairly apportion the costs based on benefit to each parcel. B. Assessment Methodology Assessment Units: To assess benefits equitably, it is necessary to relate the different types of parcel improvements to each other. The Assessment Unit (AU) method of apportionment uses an acre as the basic unit of assessment. The AU method of apportioning benefit is typically seen as the most appropriate and equitable assessment methodology for calculating benefit in districts formed under the 1972 Act, as the benefit to each parcel from improvements are apportioned as a function of land-use type, size and development. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land-use types to determine each parcel's AU. LAND-USE/ASSESSMENT UNITS Property Type AU Value Multiplier Commercial/Industrial 1.00 Acres Vacant 2.00 Acres Single Family Residential 1.00 Unit Multi-Family Residential 1.00 Unit 7 The following table summarizes the assessment rate for the district: Land Use Tvpe Assessment Rate Commercial/Industrial $51.40/Acre C. Assessment All assessed lots or parcels within the District are listed on the assessment role, which is on file in the office of the City Clerk and the City Engineer, and hereby made a part of this Engineer's Report, by reference. The assessment roll states the net amount to be assessed upon all assessable lands within the District for Fiscal Year 2011/2012, and describes each assessable lot or parcel of land within the District. These lots and parcels are more particularly described on the County assessment Roll, which is on file in the office of the San Bernardino County Assessor and by reference is made a part of this Engineer's Report. 8 Section 4 -Annexations: Calendar Year 2010 Annexations Street Light Maintenance District No. 6 PROJECT UNITS/ACRES TOTAL EBUs ANNEXATION DATE DRC2006-00580 1.76 3.52 5/19/2010 DRC2009-00586 1.06 2.12 12/01/2010 DRC2007-00247 2.00 4.00 12/15/2010 DRC2007-00247 1.70 3.40 12/15/2010 9 Section 5 - Assessment Diagram: ~o cc ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ v ,~ N +,rw ~- Y/ J (p C ~ U V1 ® u] ^` O V/ ~ ~ ny ti~a4~ C1 ~~ V ~ m ~ r~ ~ ~ I ~ ~. 1 I ~ N C i ~ ~ m ~ o ai - 3 1 m w m o o ~~ ~ u°. Q i nV 1se3 ~ ~1.+ 1 ® v .f; i ny epuenni;3 i ny epuenny3 J ' - ~ ~e ~aa~~ ~ed.._.. 4__~u_. emu' ny ~a;sayooa ! ~ n ~a sa oo y / v ~ y a i _ ny ua~ilPW f._.._.._..° ~ ny ua~gPW. •- -- ~~ ny uaneH ny uaneH ny esow~aH ny esow~aH nt/ PIe9~4a~V nV Pley~yo~H ny uewllaH ~ ny uewllaH ~ L L ~ ny p~e~(awn ;g uegawe~ . ~~~ii~~E$spEe~ ~ es S~vE t~~c Ei _ _ ny anal °a=§5~E~82=~ fn C f~ "0_ (n ;e ~S gse FSI L J - 3 t ~'~- 3yg~ ~ ~ = O ~ €_€,e_~Y ~ ~5S 4° ~~z d§ -p ~ f0 O Q F:.¢:~~ EE§.~ a' C m V_ BS%e ese~d €~ ~ °Y ~gs° p]E FE d_ v C °5ggg`~S E9a ~m:e W m 6~enz ~gfed96 _ 6€8 E~ € EE. ez ~° ~aa~e~aeEgi~ zU E~~e° r €geffg U $L~E&g~~a~~E Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2011/2012 City of Rancho Cucamonga Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 7 (North Etiwanda) ENGINEER'S REPORT AFFIDAVIT Rancho Cucamonga Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 7 (North Etiwanda) City of Rancho Cucamonga San Bernardino County, State of California This Report describes the District and all relevant zones therein including the improvements, budgets, parcels and assessments to be levied for fiscal year 2011/2012, as they existed at the time of the passage of the Resolution of Intention. Reference is hereby made to the San Bernardino County assessor's maps for a detailed description of the lines and dimensions of parcels within the District. The undersigned respectively submits the enclosed Report as directed by the City Council. Dated this 3rd of Approved by: hector Of Engineering Services/City Engineer 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS OVERVIEW .........................................................................................4 SECTION 1 -DESCRIPTION OF FACILITIES ............................................5 SECTION 2 -ESTIMATE OF COSTS AND EXPENSES ..............................6 SECTION 3 -METHOD OF ASSESSMENT APPORTIONMENT ...................7 A. GENERAL ..............................................................:.......7 B. ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY .......................................7 C. ASSESSMENT ................................................................8 SECTION 4 -ANNEXATIONS ................................................................9 SECTION 5 -ASSESSMENT DIAGRAMS ..............................................10 3 Overview The FY 2011/2012 Annual Report for Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 7 (North Etiwanda) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Part 2, Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Street Lighting and Light Act of 1972). Section 1 Description of Facilities The plans and specifications for improvements maintained by the Assessment District consist of a general description of the nature, location, and the extent of the improvements proposed to be maintained, and are attached hereto. Section 2 Estimates of Cost and Expenses An estimate of the maintenance cost of the improvements, including incidental costs and expenses in connection therewith for FY 2011/2012, is set forth on the lists thereof, attached hereto. Section 3 Method of Assessment Apportionment Discuses the methodology used for calculating assessments in the District. The method reflects the composition of the parcels, and the improvements and services provided, to fairly apportion the costs based on benefit to each parcel. The assessment roll states the net amount to be assessed upon all assessable lands within the District for FY 2011/2012, and describes each assessable lot or parcel of land within the District. These lots and parcels are more particularly described on the County assessment Roll, which is on file in the office of the San Bernardino County Assessor and by reference is made a part of this Engineer's Report. Section 4 Annexations List the developments, which have annexed to the Street Lighting Maintenance District within Calendar year 2010. Section 5 Assessment Diagrams Shows the boundaries of the areas to be annexed to the Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 7 and the general boundaries of the District. For details regarding the boundaries and dimensions of the respective parcels and subdivisions of land within the Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 7, refer to the San Bernardino County Assessor's maps. I 4 Section 1 -Description of Facilities: Street Light Maintenance District No. 7 (SLD #7) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located on local streets in what is termed the North Etiwanda area of the City. Generally, this area encompasses the area of the City east of Day Creek Channel and north of Highland Avenue within the incorporated area of the city. It has been determined that the facilities in this district benefit the properties within this area of the City. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on local streets and traffic signals (or a portion thereof) on local streets within the North Etiwanda area. Typically, street lights are installed by private development as a condition of a development project's approval. Traffic signals can be installed by development or as a City capital improvement project. Historically, the installation of street lights and traffic signals has not been funded with Street Light District funds, however, this is permitted under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972. Any new street lights in areas to be maintained by the District will become part of the active work program at such time as these new areas are annexed into the District. The normal process will be the dedication of the areas to the City, at which time a sufficient non-refundable deposit will be made by the developer to the City. This deposit will provide for costs of energizing and six months of ordinary and usual maintenance, operation and servicing of the street lights in each development at the time of initial operation of the lighting system. The costs will be based on the number and type of street lights and based on Southern California Edison Company's rate for street lights. Immediately upon energization of the street lights, those street lights will become a part of the work program of the district. 5 Section 2 -Estimate of Costs and Expenses: The majority of the budgeted operating costs for SLD #7 are for electric utility charges for the street lights and traffic signals within the district. The projected costs to operate and maintain SLD #7 are as follows: District Budget Estimated 2011/12 Budget Personnel Services Regular Salaries $22,080.00 Part-time Salaries 12,700.00 Fringe Benefits 11.780.00 Subtotal Personnel $46,560.00 Operations and Maintenance Operations and Maintenance $5,150.00 Equipment Operations and Maintenance 0.00 Contract Services 14,670.00 Utilities Telephone Utilities 0.00 Electric Utilities 201,320.00 Assessment Administration 17,170.00 General Overhead 7,180.00 Interfund Allocation 16.290.00 Subtotal Operations and Maintenance $261,780.00 Capital Expenditures Capital Projects 0.00 Subtotal Capital Expenditures 0.00 Total District Expenditure Budget ~ $308,340.00 Total Estimated Assessment $104,020.00 Less Anticipated Delinquencies 5 2(.90.00) Total Estimated Revenue $98,730.00 Plus Operating Reserve Fund Contribution 209.610.00 Total Expenditure Budget $308,340.00 Total Estimated Assessment $104,020.00 Total District EBU Count 3122.00 Actual Assessment per EBU -Fiscal Year 2011/12 $33.32 Maximum Allowable Assessment per EBU -Fiscal Year 2011/12 $33.32 6 Section 3 -Method of Assessment Apportionment: A. General The 1972 Act permits the establishments of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include construction, maintenance and servicing of public lights, landscaping and appurtenant facilities. The 1972 Act further requires that the cost of these improvements be levied according to benefit rather than assessed value: "The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements. " The formula used for calculating assessments in the District therefore reflects the composition of the parcels, and the improvements and services provided, to fairly apportion the costs based on benefit to each parcel. B. Assessment Methodology Equivalent Benefit Units: To assess benefits equitably, it is necessary to relate the different types of parcel improvements to each other. The Equivalent Benefit Unit method of apportionment uses the single-family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single family home equals one The Equivalent Benefit Unit (EBU). Every other land-use is converted to EBU's based on an assessment formula that equates the property's specific development status, type of development (land-use), and size of the property, as compared to asingle-family home (SFR). The EBU method of apportioning benefit is typically seen as the most appropriate and equitable assessment methodology for calculating benefit in districts formed under the 1972 Act, as the benefit to each parcel from improvements are apportioned as a function of land-use type, size and development. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land-use types to determine each parcel's EBU. LAND-USE/EQUIVALENT BENEFIT UNITS Commercial/Industrial 2.00 Acres Vacant 2.00 Acres Single Family Residential 1.00 Unit Multi-Family Residential 1.00 Unit 7 The following table summarizes the assessment rate for the district: Land Use Tvpe Assessment Rate Single Family $33.32/SFD C. Assessment All assessed lots or parcels within the District are listed on the assessment role, which is on file in the office of the City Clerk and the City Engineer, and hereby made a part of this Engineer's Report, by reference. The assessment roll states the net amount to be assessed upon all assessable lands within the District for Fiscal Year 2011/2012, and describes each assessable lot or parcel of land within the District. These lots and parcels are more particularly described on the County assessment Roll, which is on file in the office of the San Bernardino County Assessor and by reference is made a part of this Engineer's Report. 8 Section 4 -Annexations: There are no annexations for Calendar year 2010. 9 Section 5 - Assessment Diagram: to v ~ ~~ V ~~ ~ Y _ I_ J c O ® u~ C U ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ _ ny ti~ay~ ~ ^: h C a J ~•r ° /~ / •y ~ N C_ _ w J N m ~ O = m t ° 3 0 ' ~ o u. ¢` i ny lse3 N y + ® ~ v . "-" ~ ny epuennB3 • - i ~ J `~ ~ i ny ~alsayooa ! n ~a sa oo y Jj ~ y l y a . i ny ua~!II!W f._.._.._.._..- - -i ny ua~!II!W i i i i i i ny uaneH ~ - ~n uane i y H i ny esow~aH i - - i ny esowiaH i ~ nN PIeQ!yo~V i - . i ~nV PIeQ!yo~d i ny uewllaH i - ~.~~" N ny uewllaH i r°.. ~, r L ~ i i i ny p e/au!n 3S ue!lawe~ ~ -- • ~i~ ~ '8e'~f'94 i!~~ee ~ dd y.....•. ~ ••~ ~ EV g•y3 P ~a ` GS S ~ •._:-..1..•_..___ . .l ny anal S6@~~ifi~F~~ ES • .~ ~.~• g S~ y@ ~~g~~~ ~ •~~' L J m N _ L 3 O s L F W. ~ EIIE°z9 ~Ei&E d' N m LL = s5'i g`'~7 p~~ e~ 41 T V C E iH ( OL`EEi!!S~ Fey ~e~ SSaE 6F~ N m d s '481;x$ ~~t 3 =o ~ ~ z=~;3 dae ~a~3 dsa Ea~'~ ~ C?~ U E=be~=~j€° 8 €8 8 '~~ Bv .e 8 offE Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2011/2012 City of Rancho Cucamonga Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 8 (South Etiwanda) ENGINEER'S REPORT AFFIDAVIT Rancho Cucamonga Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 8 (South Etiwanda) City of Rancho Cucamonga San Bernardino County, State of California This Report describes the District and all relevant zones therein including the improvements, budgets, parcels and assessments to be levied for fiscal year 2011/2012, as they existed at the time of the passage of the Resolution of Intention. Reference is hereby made to the San Bernardino County assessor's maps for a detailed description of the lines and dimensions of parcels within the District. The undersigned respectively submits the enclosed Report as directed by the City Council. Dated this 3`d of Auoust. 2011. Approved of Engineering Services/City Engineer II TABLE OF CONTENTS OVERVIEW .........................................................................................4 SECTION 1 -DESCRIPTION OF FACILITIES ............................................5 SECTION 2 -ESTIMATE OF COSTS AND EXPENSES ..............................6 SECTION 3 -METHOD OF ASSESSMENT APPORTIONMENT ...................7 A. GENERAL ......................................................................7 B. ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY .......................................7 C. ASSESSMENT ................................................................8 SECTION 4 -ANNEXATIONS ................................................................9 SECTION 5 -ASSESSMENT DIAGRAMS ..............................................10 III Overview The FY 2011/2012 Annual Report for Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 8 (South Etiwanda) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Part 2, Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Street Lighting and Light Act of 1972). Section 1 Description of Facilities The plans and specifications for improvements maintained by the Assessment District consist of a general description of the nature, location, and the extent of the improvements proposed to be maintained, and are attached hereto. Section 2 Estimates of Cost and Expenses An estimate of the maintenance cost of the improvements, including incidental costs and expenses in connection therewith for FY 2011/2012, is set forth on the lists thereof, attached hereto. Section 3 Method of Assessment Apportionment Discuses the methodology used for calculating assessments in the District. The method reflects the composition of the parcels, and the improvements and services provided, to fairly apportion the costs based on benefit to each parcel. The assessment roll states the net amount to be assessed upon all assessable lands within the District for FY 2011/2012, and describes each assessable lot or parcel of land within the District. These lots and parcels are more particularly described on the County assessment Roll, which is on file in the office of the San Bernardino County Assessor and by reference is made a part of this Engineer's Report Section 4 Annexations List the developments, which have annexed to the Street Lighting Maintenance District within Calendar year 2010. Section 5 Assessment Diagrams Shows the boundaries of the areas to be annexed to the Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 8 and the general boundaries of the District. For details regarding the boundaries and dimensions of the respective parcels and subdivisions of land within the Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 8, refer to the San Bernardino County Assessor's maps. 4 Section 1 -Description of Facilities: Street Light Maintenance District No. 8 (SLD #8) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located on local streets in what is termed the South Etiwanda area of the City. Generally, this area encompasses the area of the City east of Etiwanda Avenue, north of Foothill Boulevard and south of Highland Avenue within the incorporated area of the City. It has been determined that the facilities in this district benefit the properties within this area of the City. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on local streets and traffic signals (or a portion thereof) on local streets within the South Etiwanda area. Typically, street lights are installed by private development as a condition of a development project's approval. Traffic signals can be installed by development or as a City capital improvement project. Historically, the installation of street lights and traffic signals has not been funded with Street Light District funds; however, this is permitted under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972. Any new street lights in areas to be maintained by the District will become part of the active work program at such time as these new areas are annexed into the District. The normal process will be the dedication of the areas to the City, at which time a sufficient non-refundable deposit will be made by the developer to the City. This deposit will provide for costs of energizing and six months of ordinary and usual maintenance, operation and servicing of the street lights in each development at the time of initial operation of the lighting system. The costs will be based on the number and type of street lights and based on Southern California Edison Company's rate for street lights. Immediately upon energization of the street lights, those street lights will become a part of the work program of the district. 5 Section 2 -Estimate of Costs and Expenses: The majority of the budgeted operating costs for SLD #8 are for electric utility charges for the street lights and traffic signals within the district. The projected costs to operate and maintain SLD #8 are as follows: District Budget Estimated 2011/12 Budget Personnel Services Regular Salaries $22,700.00 Part-time Salaries 12,700.00 Fringe Benefits 11.130.00 Subtotal Personnel $44,530.00 Operations and Maintenance Operations and Maintenance $5,150.00 Equipment Operations and Maintenance 0.00 Contract Services 14,670.00 Utilities Telephone Utilities 0.00 Electric Utilities 66,540.00 Assessment Administration 9,390.00 General Overhead 8,980.00 Interfund Allocation 16.290.00 Subtotal Operations and Maintenance $121,020.00 Capital Expenditures Capital Projects 0.00 Subtotal Capital Expenditures ~ 0.00 Total District Expenditure Budget ~ $165,550.00 Total Estimated Assessment $131,830.00 Less Anticipated Delinquencies (0.001 Total Estimated Revenue $131,830.00 Plus Operating Reserve Fund Contribution 33.710.00 Total Expenditure Budget $185,550.00 Total Estimated Assessment $131,830.00 Total District EBU Count 2,144.56 Actual Assessment per EBU -Fiscal Year 2011/12 $61.19 Maximum Allowable Assessment ~ er EBU -Fiscal Year 2011/12 $193.45 6 Section 3 -Method of Assessment Apportionment: A. General The 1972 Act permits the establishments of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include construction, maintenance and servicing of public lights, landscaping and appurtenant facilities. The 1972 Act further requires that the cost of these improvements be levied according to benefit rather than assessed value: "The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements. " The formula used for calculating assessments in the District therefore reflects the composition of the parcels, and the improvements and services provided, to fairly apportion the costs based on benefit to each parcel. B. Assessment Methodology Equivalent Benefit Units: To assess benefits equitably, it is necessary to relate the different types of parcel improvements to each other. The Equivalent Benefit Unit method of apportionment uses the single-family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single family home equals one The Equivalent Benefit Unit (EBU). Every other land-use is converted to EBU's based on an assessment formula that equates the property's specific development status, type of development (land-use), and size of the property, as compared to asingle-family home (SFR). The EBU method of apportioning benefit is typically seen as the most appropriate and equitable assessment methodology for calculating benefit in districts formed under the 1972 Act, as the benefit to each parcel from improvements are apportioned as a function of land-use type, size and development. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land-use types to determine each parcel's EBU. LAND-USE/EQUIVALENT BENEFIT UNITS Property Type EBU Value Multiplier Multi-Family Residential 1.00 Unit Single Family Residential 1.00 Unit Commercial/Industrial 2.00 Acre Vacant 2.00 Acre 7 The following table summarizes the assessment rate for the district: Land Use Tvpe Assessment Rate Single Family $61.19/SFD C. Assessment All assessed lots or parcels within the District are listed on the assessment role, which is on file in the office of the City Clerk and the City Engineer, and hereby made a part of this Engineer's Report, by reference. The assessment roll states the net amount to be assessed upon all assessable lands within the District for Fiscal Year 2011/2012, and describes each assessable lot or parcel of land within the District. These lots and parcels are more particularly described on the County assessment Roll, which is on file in the office of the San Bernardino County Assessor and by reference is made a part of this Engineer's Report. 8 Section 4 -Annexations: PROJECT UNITS/ACRES TOTAL EBUs ANNEXATION DATE 0227-071-17 5.0 2.0 6/2/2010 9 Section 5 -Assessment Diagram: io W ~r 'i ~r •~ O AC W y.+ .C ~1 .~ J ~.F ~F y ny ua~lll!W ny uaneH ny esowlaH nb' Pley!4oJb' ny uewllaH ;g ue!lawe~ o~ zo aU e=~~ e ~$szCS~g :2k Ps's g2 c 0 ... - ny i(JJay~ v N C _ J m ~ N = L 3 m o 0 m a ~ ~° ~ ~ N .~ J pp ~ U ~ 4 1 d ^r~ N N 0 ® ~ 0 N N O nV 1se3 in L ~'j .._.._. _ ny epuenn133 ny epuenn!13 8 ~aaJ~ ~(ed ny Ja;sayooa ny Ja;sayooa i - ~_ ----- ! ny uaA!II!W -- - ny uaneH !; ny esowlaH i j nt/ Pleq!yoJy i /'~•r' N ny uewllaH /r•• L ~ i nH P e/Iau!n i ~ :. 1 ~~~i H~€_e~ dl j~ ~ nt/ an01~ g ~ Fsfr ~t 3`a pp ~ € _y ..~ .. ~ ~ &fr Ft ~g ~ 0!' c m O Q LL f{ @ ~4 gs2{g=E3 ~~~~ e ~' fr v C e p { e° g'as 5~g~s sSFag°$ E C N N m E, i~•go€~ ~ a~~$aF~E;?„~ P443 STAFF REPORT COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT Date: August 3, 2011 To: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager From: Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director Joe Cusimano, Police Chief Michael Newcombe, Police Lieutenant RANCHO CUCAMONGA Subject: CONSIDERATION OF AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING A PERMIT PROCESS FOR DESIGNATED PARADES AND ASSEMBLIES WITHIN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached ordinance adding Chapter 44 to Title 8 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code establishing a permit process for designated parades and assemblies within the City of Rancho Cucamonga. BACKGROUND: City staff, the Police Department, the Fire District and the City Attorney have developed the attached ordinance for consideration by the City Council which will add a section to the Municipal Code establishing a permit process for specified parades and assemblies within the city. The purpose of the proposed ordinance is to establish a process to obtain important information regarding planned parades and/or assemblies so as to allow the Police Department, Fire District and other City Departments to effectively plan in advance to assure the safety of all participants and residents alike during these events. Adoption of an ordinance establishing a permit process for these parades and assemblies is an identified City Council goal for 2011-12. As defined within the ordinance, organizers of such events would be required to obtain a no fee permit for events which are defined as follows: Assembly Any meeting, demonstration, picket line, rally, gathering, or group of seventy-five (75) or more persons having a common purpose, design, or goal, upon any public street, sidewalk, alley, park, or other public place, which assembly substantially inhibits the usual flow of pedestrian or vehicular travel or which occupies any public area, other than a "parade", as defined in this section. P444 ORDINANCE CONSIDERATION REGARDING ESTABLISHING APERMIT PROCESS FOR DESIGNATED PARADES AND ASSEMBLIES WITHIN THE QTY LIMITS AUGUST 3, 2011 PAGE 2 Parade Any march, demonstration, procession, motorcade, or promenade consisting of persons having a common purpose, design, or goal, upon any public place, which march, demonstration, procession, motorcade, or promenade does not comply .with normal and usual traffic regulations or control. Event organizers will be required to obtain a no fee Parade and Assembly Permit through the Planning Department, in accordance with the provisions of the ordinance. The permit application will be reviewed in a timely manner by the Police Department, Fire Department and other appropriate City Departments to insure that all identified safety and traffic requirements are properly planned for. Again, the goal of this permit process is to obtain and review all of the pertinent event related information to insure the safety of all participants and residents, while also insuring the rights to freedom of speech and the rights of people to peaceably assemble. History has shown that passion for a certain cause sometimes leads to action in the form of assemblies and/or demonstrations. When not properly planned for, these assemblies have the potential to develop into civil disobedience, civil disturbances or even more serious situations. Within the past several years, Rancho Cucamonga has experienced a number of public demonstrations that have caused some significant traffic disruptions and concerns for vehicular and pedestrian safety. Good advance planning allows appropriate public safety personnel and City staff to prepare for a safe traffic and pedestrian flow, to design an incident action plan and to properly plan for needed resources. Approval of this ordinance will also provide the Police Department with the legal enforcement tools they would need if an actual parade or assembly were to evolve into a public safety concern. While these types of activities often take place on public rights-of-way and/or near major streets, sometimes they are planned for other public areas such as parks, civic centers, courthouses or other community facilities. The permit procedures proposed within the ordinance will allow effective planning for all of these possibilities. The proposed ordinance includes the following sections relating to the permitting process: Exemptions to the requirements Application process, timeline and required information General criteria for issuance or denial of the permit Nondiscrimination language Timeframe for permit issuance or denial Prohibited activities at these events Cost reimbursement requirements Permit violation • Judicial review options 2 P445 ORDINANCE CONSIDERATION REGARDING ESTABLISHING A PERMIT PROCESS FORDESIGNATED PARADES AND ASSEMBLIES WITHINTHE C[TYLIMi"IS AUGUST 3, 2011 PAGE 3 The proposed ordinance was written by the City Attorney's office, following the template of successful ordinances they have prepared for other municipalities in southern California. The Police Department checked with the three (3) adjoining cities to determine which have similar ordinances in place. The City of Upland does not currently have such regulations. The City of Ontario has an assembly ordinance which is narrower in scope than the proposed ordinance and only governs activities occurring in parks and using amplified sound. The City of Fontana has very similar requirements to those now proposed in Rancho Cucamonga. It is very common for cities to have an ordinance such as the one proposed. The comprehensive nature of the recommended Parade and Assemblies Ordinance for Rancho Cucamonga will position the City as one of the most prepared municipalities in the area in planning for these types of occurrences. Respectfully submitted, Kevin cArdle Community Services Director Chief Michael I~wc~mbe Police Lieutenant Attachments: Proposed Ordinance 3 P446 ORDINANCE NO. R~Iq AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ADDING CHAPTER 44 TO TITLE 8 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING A PARADES AND ASSEMBLIES ORDINANCE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Chapter 44 of Title 8 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code is hereby added as follows: "Chapter 8.44 -PARADES AND ASSEMBLIES 8.44.010 -Permit required. No person shall engage in, conduct, or carry on the activity of a parade or assembly without a permit issued. The permit may authorize the use of sound amplifying equipment in conjunction with a parade or assembly without an additional permit issued. 8.44.020 -Definitions. ASSEMBLY: Any meeting, demonstration, picket line, rally, gathering, or group of seventy five (75) or more persons having a common purpose, design, or goal, upon any public street, sidewalk; alley, park, or other public place, which assembly substantially inhibits the usual flow of pedestrian or vehicular travel or which occupies any public area, other than a "parade," as defined in this section. PARADE: Any march, demonstration, procession, motorcade, or promenade consisting of persons having a common purpose, design, or goal, upon any public place, which march, demonstration, procession, motorcade, or promenade does not comply with normal and usual traffic regulations or control. 8.44.030 -Exemptions. A. The permit application provisions of this chapter shall not apply to the following: (1) Funeral processions. (2) Spontaneous parades or assemblies occasioned by news or affairs coming into public knowledge within three (3) days of such parade or assembly, provided that the organizers thereof give written notice to the City at least twenty four (24) hours prior to such parade or assembly. Such written notice shall contain all of the following information: (a) The name, address and telephone number of the person or persons seeking to conduct the parade or assembly, who shall be considered a permittee for the purposes of this chapter; P447 (b) The name, address and telephone number of the headquarters of the organization, if any, and of the organizer or responsible head of such organization, by whom or on whose behalf the parade or assembly is proposed to be conducted; (c) The name, address and telephone number of the person who will chair the parade or assembly and who will be responsible for its conduct; (d) The location and date of the proposed parade or assembly, including the assembly area, disbanding area, and the route to be traveled; (e) An estimate of the approximate number of persons who will be participating in the parade or assembly; (f) An estimate of the approximate number of persons who will be observing the parade or assembly; (g) The time at which the parade or assembly will start and conclude; (h) The type of security or other arrangements that will be provided to assure that participants are properly directed; and (i) A statement to be signed by the permittee that he or she will hold harmless and indemnify the City of Rancho Cucamonga, its elected officials, officers, employees and agents from any damages which may arise as a result of the conduct of the parade or assembly. B. The City Manager or the City Manager's designee shall deny permission of a spontaneous parade or assembly by making a finding pursuant to subsection A of section 8.44.050 within eighteen (18) hours after submission of the notice pursuant to subsection A(2) of section 8.44.030. If such a finding cannot be made, the City Manager or City Manager's Designee shall approve permission. C. If permission is denied, the City Manager or City Manager's Designee shall immediately provide notice of the denial, including the relevant finding pursuant to subsection A of section 8.44.050, in all of the following manners: (1) By telephone to the permittee; (2) By written notice to the permittee; and (3) If the permittee provides a fax number, by fax. 8.44.040 -Application for permit. A. A person seeking issuance of a permit pursuant to this chapter shall file an application with the City Manager or the City Manager's Designee on forms supplied by the City. B. The application shall be filed with the City Manager or the City Manager's Designee in accordance with the following time limitations: P448 (1) Not less than six (6) days prior to the date of the parade or assembly if the parade or assembly is proposed to take place in whole or in part on, in or along the roadway portion (other than within crosswalks) of the following streets in the City of Rancho Cucamonga: Fourth St., Arrow Rt., Foothill Blvd., Church St., Base Line Rd. 19`" St., Carnelian St., Archibald Ave., Hermosa Ave., Haven Ave., Milliken Ave., Day Creek Blvd., Etiwanda Ave. (2) Not less than four (4) days prior to the date of the parade or assembly if the parade or assembly is proposed to take place in whole or in part on, in or along the roadway portion (other than within crosswalks) of any other street in a commercial zone within the City of Rancho Cucamonga; (3) Not less than three (3) days prior to the date of the parade or assembly if the parade or assembly is proposed to take place in a residential zone, or outside of the roadway in a commercial zone, but within the sidewalk or any other portion of the public right of way; or (4) Not less than two (2) days prior to the date of the parade or assembly if the parade or assembly is proposed to take place in whole or in part on, in or along any park or other publicly owned traditional public forum in the City of Rancho Cucamonga not governed by subsections B(1) through B(3) of this section. C. The application shall include, but shall not be limited to, the following information: (1) The name, address and telephone number of the person or persons seeking to conduct the parade or assembly, who is the permittee for the purposes of this chapter; (2) The name, address and telephone number of the headquarters of the organization, if any, and of the organizer or responsible head of such organization, by whom or on whose behalf the parade or assembly is proposed to be conducted; (3) The name, address and telephone number of the person who will chair the parade or assembly and who will be responsible for its conduct; (4) The location and date of the proposed parade or assembly, including the assembly area, disbanding area, and the route to be traveled; (5) An estimate of the approximate number of persons who will be participating in the parade or assembly; (6) An estimate of the approximate number of persons who will be observing the parade or assembly; (7) The time when the parade or assembly will start and conclude; (8) The type of security or other arrangements that will be provided to assure that participants are properly directed; P449 (9) The minimum and maximum speeds that the parade is to travel, if applicable; (10)The maximum number of platoons or units, if any, in the parade or assembly, and the maximum and minimum interval of space to be maintained between the units of such parade or assembly; (11)The maximum length of such parade or assembly in miles or fractions thereof; (12)The number and type of vehicles in the parade or assembly, if any; (13)Whether any of the participants in the parade or assembly will be wearing any type of mask or other face covering; (14)A statement to be signed by the permittee that he or she will hold harmless and indemnify the City of Rancho Cucamonga, its elected officials, officers, employees and agents from any damages which may arise as a result of the conduct of the parade or assembly for which the permit is sought; and (15)Written permission from a private property owner's for his or her property to be used for the purpose of parade or assembly set up or dispersal, if applicable. D. Within twenty four (24) hours of the submission of the application, the City Manager or the City Manager's Designee must notify the applicant, in writing, whether the application is complete. If no such notice is given within twenty four (24) hours after submission, the application will be deemed to be complete. 8.44.050 -General criteria for issuance or denial of permission or a permit. A. The City Manager or City Manager's Designee shall issue a permit if an application is submitted as required by section 8.44.040, or shall grant permission for a noticed parade pursuant to subsection B of section 8.44.030, unless there is a finding of any of the following: (1) The information contained in the notice or application is false or intentionally misleading; (2) The parade or assembly is proposed to take place in the roadway portion of any street in a commercial zone between the hours of eight o'clock (8:00) A.M. and ten o'clock (10:00) A.M. or between the hours of four o'clock (4:00) P.M. and six thirty o'clock (6:30) P.M., Monday through Friday, unless the parade or assembly will occur on a national holiday; (3) The parade or assembly is proposed for a time and location for which another parade or assembly permit has been previously issued; (4) The parade or assembly will require the simultaneous closure of the roadway portion of more than two (2) streets that run in a generally north and south direction between the hours of seven o'clock (7:00) A. M. and eight o'clock (8:00) P.M., Monday through Friday, or between the hours of ten o'clock..._ .. P450 (10:00) A.M. and six o'clock (6:00) P.M. on Saturday, unless the parade or assembly will occur on a national holiday; (5) The parade or assembly will require the simultaneous closure of the roadway portion of more than two (2) streets that run generally in an east and west direction between the hours of seven o'clock (7:00) A.M. and eight o'clock (8:00) P.M., Monday through Friday, or between the hours of ten o'clock (10:00) A.M. and six o'clock (6:00) P.M. on Saturday, unless the parade or assembly will occur on a national holiday; (6) The parade or assembly, by itself or in combination with other parades or assemblies, will require closure of the roadway portion of any street in a commercial zone for more than three (3) hours in any one day between the hours of seven o'clock (7:00) A.M. and eight o'clock (8:00) P.M., Monday through Friday; (7) The proposed route or location of the parade or assembly traverses a street or other public right of way that was scheduled for maintenance, construction or repair prior to the application for that parade or assembly permit, and the conduct of the parade or assembly would interfere with such maintenance, construction or repair or the maintenance, construction or repair would represent a threat to the health or safety of the participants in the parade or assembly; (8) The proposed area for the assembly or for the set up or dispersal of a parade could not physically accommodate the number of participants expected to participate in the parade or assembly, as reflected in the application completed submitted pursuant to subsection C of section 8.44.040; or (g) The parade or assembly would result in a violation of any federal, state or local law or regulation B. If the City Manager or the City Manager's Designee makes a finding pursuant to subsection A of this section, he or she shall deny permission or a permit to conduct the parade or assembly. C. As a condition of the issuance of a permit under the provisions of this chapter, the City Manager or the City Manager's Designee may require that the parade or assembly be limited to a portion of the width of the street or right of way upon which the applicant seeks to conduct the parade or assembly, provided that such limitation does not limit or interfere with the conduct of the parade or assembly or cause the parade or assembly to violate any other provision of this chapter or any other federal, state or local law or regulation. 8.44.060 -Nondiscrimination. The official designated by the City to act on permit applications shall uniformly consider each application upon its merits, shall not discriminate in granting or denying applications, and shall not deny any permit based upon a subject matter or viewpoint expressed in the parade or assembly. 5 P451 8.44.070 -Notice of issuance or denial of permit. A. The City Manager or the City Manager's Designee shall approve or deny the permit application within the following time limitations, and shall notify in writing the applicant of the action taken: (1) If the permit is sought under the provisions of subsection 8.44.0406(1) or B(2), within two (2) days after submission of the application; or ' (2) If the permit is sought under the provisions of subsection 8.44.0406(3) or B(4), within twenty four (24) hours after submission of the application. B. If the permit is denied, the notice of denial shall set forth the findings for denial pursuant to subsection A of section 8.44.050. 8.44.080 -Interference with parade or assembly. No person shall knowingly: A. Join or participate in any parade or assembly conducted under permit from the City in violation of any of the terms of said permit; B. Join or participate in any permitted parade or assembly without the consent of the permittee; or C. In any manner interfere with the progress or orderly conduct of a permitted parade or assembly. 8.44.090 -Prohibitions. The following prohibitions shall apply to all demonstrations, rallies, picket lines, parades and assemblies: A. It shall be unlawful for any person to carry or possess, while participating in any parade or assembly, any length of lumber, wood, or wood lath greater than one foot (1') in length, unless such object is of wood, is blunted at its ends, and is one-fourth inch ('/;') or less in thickness and two inches (2") or less in width. If not generally rectangular in shape, such object shall not exceed three-fourths inch (3/;') in its thickest dimension. B. It shall be unlawful for any person to carry or possess any length of plastic pipe or metal greater than one foot (1') in length or greater than one-quarter inch ('/a'") in its thickest dimension. C. It shall be unlawful for any person to carry any sign, poster, plaque, or notice, whether or not mounted on a length of wood as specified in subsection A of this section, unless such sign, poster, plaque, or notice is constructed solely of a cloth, paper, or cardboard material no greater than one-quarter inch ('/;') in thickness. 6 P452 D. It shall be unlawful for any person to ride, drive, or cause to be ridden or driven any animal or any animal drawn vehicle upon any public street, unless specifically authorized by a permit. E. It shall be unlawful for any person to carry or possess any projectile launcher or other device which is commonly used for the purpose of launching, hurling, or throwing any object, liquid, material or other substance. F. It shall be unlawful for any person to carry, possess or wear, any gas mask or similar device designed to filter all air breathed and that would protect the respiratory tract and face against irritating, noxious or poisonous gases. G. It shall be unlawful for any person to fail to abide by the instructions of a traffic control officer given for the purpose of accommodating traffic, including emergency vehicles, through and across a parade, demonstration, rally, picket line or assembly. H. It shall be unlawful for any person to ignite and/or burn any open flame device, bonfire, recreational fire, cooking fire, warming fire, sign, flag or effigy without first obtaining a permit from the Fire District. An open flame device includes, but is not limited to, a candle, portable or stationary torch, road flare or fusee, fuel fired lantern, signal flare or sky lantern. Nothing in this section shall prohibit a disabled person from carrying a cane, walker, or similar device necessary for providing mobility so that the person may participate in a demonstration, rally, picket line, parade or assembly. 8.44.100 -Content of permit. A. The City Manager or City Manager's Designee shall state in the parade or assembly permit all of the required information provided in the approved application pursuant to subsection C of section 8.44.040. The parade or assembly permit shall also state any condition imposed pursuant to subsection C of section 8.44.050. B. The chairperson of the parade or assembly, as designated in the application, shall at all times during the parade or assembly, including during assembly and dispersal, keep and maintain a copy of the permit upon his or her person. C. The permittee shall advise all participants in the parade or assembly of the terms and conditions of the permit prior to the commencement of the parade or assembly. 8.44.110 -City's costs to be paid by person or organization responsible for parade or assembly. A permittee under the provisions of this chapter shall reimburse the City for all traffic control costs incurred in connection with diverting traffic due to the closure of streets. These costs shall be established by the City Council by resolution. No fee shall be charged based upon the need for security or increased police protection due to the nature of the parade or assembly. 8.44.120 -Violation. P453 Any violation by the permittee or any participant in a parade or assembly of the terms or conditions of a parade or assembly permit issued pursuant to this chapter or of a parade or assembly notice pursuant to section 8.44.030 is a misdemeanor. 8.44.730 -Judicial review. Any permittee may seek judicial review of any decision made pursuant to this chapter." SECTION 2. Severability. If any clause, phrase, or portion of this ordinance or the application thereof to any person or place, is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the final decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remainder of this ordinance. The City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted this ordinance, and each and every clause, phrase, or portion thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more clauses, phrases, or portions thereof be declared invalid or unconstitutional. SECTION 3. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage of this ordinance and shall cause same to be published pursuant to state law within fifteen (15) days after its passage, and this ordinance shall become effective thirty (30) days after its passage. INTRODUCED this _ day of , 2011. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this _ day of 2011 by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: EXCUSED: ATTEST: City Clerk BY: Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney P454 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO ) ss CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ~ ) I, ,City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. adding Chapter 44 of Title 8 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code regarding a Parades and Assemblies Ordinance was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the City Council on the day of , 2011 by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: EXCUSED: ATTEST: City Clerk s P455 1~ ` ~~ ' STAFF REPORT - - ~-~ CITY COUNCIL~REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY J _r- RANCHO Date: August 3, 2011 CUCAMONGA To: Mayor and City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager From: Linda D. Daniels, Deputy City Manager Subject: CONSIDERATION TO ADOPT AN ORDINANACE COMPLYING WITH ABX1 27, WHICH PROVIDES FOR THE CONTINUED OPERATION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, AND AUTHORIZATION TO REMIT TO THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO AUDITOR-CONTROLLER $27,076,930 (ESTIMATE) IN FISCAL YEAR 2011-12 AND $6,500,000 (ESTIMATE) IN FISCAL YEAR 2012-13. RECOMMENDATION In order to continue operations of the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency, it is recommended the City Council adopt an Ordinance complying with ABX1 27 -the Alternative "Voluntary" Redevelopment Program -and authorize a remittance to the County of San Bernardino Auditor-Controller in the amount of $27,076,930 (estimated) In Fiscal Year 2011-12 and $6,500,000 (estimated) in Fiscal Year 2012-13. BACKGROUND On June 15, 2011, both houses of the California State Legislature passed ABX1 26 and ABX1 27, which were subsequently signed into law by the Governor on June 29, 2011. Both bills took effect immediately upon signature by the Governor. ABX1 26 adds Parts 1.8 and 1.85 to the Community Redevelopment Law. Part 1.8 provides for the immediate curtailing of redevelopment agency activities while Part 1.85 provides for redevelopment agencies to be dissolved as of October 1, 2011 and for successor agencies to wind down the affairs of the agencies. Under ABX1 25, redevelopment agencies are now prohibited from taking a number of actions, including incurring indebtedness, making loans, entering into or modifying contracts, and adopting or amending redevelopment plans. In addition, agencies are now subject to a number of responsibilities, including preserving all assets, minimizing all liabilities and preserving all records. ABX1 27 adds Part 1.9 to the Community Redevelopment Law. Part 1.9 provides that a city, as the entity which created the local redevelopment agency, may participate in a "voluntary" program to make specified annual monetary contributions to :the State. If the City takes action to participate in the "voluntary" annual payment program, it will exempt its redevelopment agency from Parts 1.8 and 1.85, thus permitting the agency to continue to exist and implement its Redevelopment Plan. Participation in the provisions of ABX1 27 requires the city to adopt an ordinance by November 1, 2011. P456 STAFF REPOKT-CO.N9DERATTON T'O ADOPT'AN ORDINANACE COMPL77NG lT?17d AHX127, Ui1-ITCH PROVIDES PAG12 fOR TFIE C'ONl'L\'UED OPERATION\' OF'(HG R,4NC1i0 CUCAMO~\'GA REDL l2IAPb1EMAGF_i\'CY', A,\~D AU17dORIL4TlOi\'TO REM1fI/'TO "THE COUNTY OF SAN RERi\'ARUINOAUDrfOR-CONIROlLER 527,076,990 (ESl7M11ATEJ IN YISCAL 7TAR 2017-72 AND 86,500,000 ~ESr1ASATEJ IN FLfGll_ 17-i1R 2012-73. Redevelopment agencies that do not comply with the provisions of ABX1 27 will be dissolved as of October 1, 2011. Except for those provisions of the Redevelopment Law that are repealed, restricted, or revised by ABX1 26, all authority, power, and obligations previously vested with agencies pursuant to the Redevelopment Law will vest in successor agencies upon such dissolution. If, at some time in the future, the voluntary annual payment is not made, the Department of Finance (DOF) can determine the agency is subject to Parts 1.8 and 1.85 (elimination of redevelopment activities). ABX1 27 REQUIREMENTS/PROCESS On or before November 1, 2011, a city that has adopted an ordinance to extend the activities of its agency must notify the county auditor-controller, the State Controller and the DOF that the city agrees to comply with the provisions of Part 1.9. Participation in the Alternative Voluntary Redevelopment Program constitutes an agreement by the city that it assigns its rights to any payments owed from the agency, including but not limited to, payments from loan agreements, to the State in the event the city fails to make a remittance required pursuant to Part 1.9. For each fiscal year, commencing with fiscal year 2011-12, the City must remit to the County Auditor-Controller the amounts required pursuant to Part 1.9. For fiscal year 2011-12, Rancho Cucamonga's estimated remittance amount is $27,076,930. For the 2012-13 fiscal year and subsequent fiscal years, the city must remit an estimated amount of $6,500,000. The County will then make these funds available to the State. It is the Agency's understanding that these monies will not be restricted and used by the State for educational purposes only, but also for non-education purposes including expenditures for trial court, health care and budget deficit reduction overall. One-half of the total remittance amount must be paid on or before January 15th of each year and the remaining one-half must be paid on or before May 15th of each year. If the payment is not made, the auditor-controller will notify the DOF within 30 days. Upon receipt of the notification, the DOF may then determine that the agency will be subject to the requirements of Parts 1.8 and 1.85 (elimination of redevelopment activities). To make the remittances, an agency may use any available funds not otherwise obligated for other uses. For fiscal year 2011-12 only, an agency will be exempt from making the full allocation required to the Low and Moderate Income Housing Fund if the agency makes a finding that there are insufficient other moneys to meet its debt and other obligations, current priority program needs, or its obligations under the agreement with the city to transfer tax increment to the city for the remittances. Only tax increment from the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency will be used to make the voluntary payment to the City, which in turn will make the payment to the County. The City is not obligating its general fund, or any other city resources, to make the voluntary payment under ABX1 27. As noted above, in the event payment is not made to the State, and the DOF determines that an agency is to be subject to the requirements of Parts 1.8 and 1.85, then: P457 57;41FRE1'ORT-COi\'SIDERATION TO ADOPT,9N ORDllVANACE C0~l1PLY7NG W17N AAX127, U~li1CH PROV1llE5 PAGE3 FOIi T}IL- COI~TfVUED OPERA'170N OF THE RfLUCHO CUCA~NONGA RI?DE VE7-OPIvfEMAGEi\~CY, AI~'D AUIT10RfZATIOIV TO REhfI7'TO TIiF_ COUt\77"OF SAN BEANARIJINO AUDITOR-COi\7ROLLER 527,076,930 (ESTLYIATEf In' FISCAL 7"EAR 2011-12 AND r/'6,500,000 (E577AfATF'J IN PlSCAL r'Filx 2072-13. • The city will no longer be authorized to engage in redevelopment activities and the agency will become immediately subject to the provisions of Parts 1.8 and 1.85. The State will be entitled to an assignment of any rights of the city to any payments from the agency to which the city is entitled for the purpose of mitigating the fiscal impact to the State related to the failure of the city to make the required remittance payment. COMPLIANCE (ABX1 27) VS. NON-COMPLIANCE (ABX1 26) Based on the most recent data available, as well as legal interpretations regarding the requirements of ABX1 26 and ABX1 27, staff has determined that, at this time, compliance with ABX1 27 would be in the best interests of the City and the community of Rancho Cucamonga. While the remittance amounts required under ABX1 27 will significantly impact existing and future redevelopment activities, the alternative of non-compliance and dissolution of the Agency could have an even greater negative impact on the community. Provided that the State does not alter its declared redevelopment take-away amount in future years, the Agency could meet its obligation for the 2011-12 remittance amount, as well as succeeding payments. To do so, however, would mean effectively using a substantial amount of existing economic reserves, allowable housing set-aside funds for FY 2011/12 and other monies earmarked for public infrastructure improvements which are not currently obligated or under contract. Although compliance with ABX1 27 would significantly impact current and future economic development, housing and infrastructure programs, some tax increment would be available for redevelopment activities to be accomplished, albeit at a much slower pace and probably overall smaller future projects. Projects the Agency will be able to continue working on currently, or undertake in the near future, include: Base Line and I-15 off ramp expansion • Foothill Boulevard Phase 2, between the railroad overpass and Grove Avenue • Hellman Avenue Storm Drain -Phase 2 (between the railroad and Cucamonga Creek Channel) Development of additional senior and family housing; first-time home buyer down payment assistance funding; mobile home rental assistance funding The alternative to complying with ABX1 27 is to effectively dissolve the Redevelopment Agency and require that all of its assets be transferred to a "successor agency', which would be the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The successor agency would be governed by an Oversight Board which is composed of seven members including: A member at large selected by the Mayor • A member selected by the Mayor that represents the employees of the Agency A member selected from the largest (based on property tax) non-enterprise special district within the territory of the former redevelopment agency (for Rancho Cucamonga this would be the Fire Protection District) A member selected by the County Superintendent of Education P458 STAFF REPORT-CON.fIDERAT/ONTO ADOf'I'M'ORDIIVANACL COiYfPLY'LVG ~YI7NABX127, IV7~IICH PROVIDES PAGE4 FOR THE CONTINUED OPERATION OFTHF RANCHO CUCAAIONGA KEf7EVELOPA~fEM' AGENCY, AND AUI'HORIZATIONTO RGMIT TO'il-IE COUNfYOPSAN HERA~ARDINOAUDITOR-CONIROIJ-t31i 827,076,930 ~L-STIMATE~ fN FISCAL }~'AR 2071-12 AND 86,500,000 (ESfIMATEJ fN FISCAL YEAR 2012-13. • A member selected by the Chancellor of the California Community Colleges Two members selected by the County Board of Supervisors The Oversight Board would then be responsible for winding down the affairs of the Agency including disposing of all assets. While the City would have direct authority in selecting 3 of the 7 members of the Oversight Board, this would not be a majority of the Board members. The successor entity would have the option of continuing to provide housing programs, however the legislation does place limitations on the housing related assets that are available to the successor entity. Until such time as the successor agency has paid off all obligations, only that portion of tax increment required to pay down existing obligations would be retained. All other tax increment monies would be allocated.to a County pool and Rancho Cucamonga would no longer receive the benefit of redevelopment, which has been a vital economic tool for the community. REREDEVELOPMENT: AVITAL TOOL FOR RANCHO CUCAMONGA For more than 25 years, the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency has played a significant role in supporting the growth and overall quality of life in the community through infrastructure and public improvements; being a catalyst for economic growth and job creation; and being a provider of quality, affordable housing. Below is a summary of these efforts: INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS Just within the past 10 years (2000-2010), the Redevelopment Agency has funded more than $155 million in infrastructure projects (street improvements; flood control) and public facilities. This investment in the community has also generated more than 2,295 direct jobs and has been a catalyst for additional private investment and job creation. The following projects are a few examples of Agency-funded efforts in the past decade and represent a portion of its overall investment in Rancho Cucamonga: o Upper Cucamonga Storm Drain and Hellman Avenue Widening Investment: $5,500,000 /Direct Jobs Created: 86 Provided much needed flood protection for businesses and residences that are located within the project area. o Hellman Avenue (Lower Reach) Storm Drain Investment: $17,000,000 /Direct Jobs Created: 265 Provided much needed flood protection in the southwest section of the Project Area. o Foothill Boulevard Improvements - Phases I and II Investment: $19,500,000 /Direct Jobs Created: 304 Included substantial median work as well as general construction and landscaping enhancements to Foothill Blvd. The project has significantly P459 STAFF RGPORT-COfVS'IDERATION TO ADOPTAN ORDINAA'ACE COMPL7TNG U~fI7i ABX727, IfiF11CH PROVIDES PAGE) FOR 7NE CONTINUED OPERATION OF 7T1L- RANCHO CUCAA40NGA RF_DEVElAPA1ENI-AGENCY, AND AU77-LORI%~TION 7'0 IiEA4IT 7'O'INE COUNT]' OF SAN BERI~'ARD/IVO AUDITOR-CON7ROLI..E72 827,076,930 (ES-nAaAT'E) IN FISGIL YEAa 207 7 -12 ANn 86,500,000 (T_srrnuTS) IN FrSCAt TEAR 2072-13. improved traffic circulation along the city's primary retail/commercial corridor and has helped revitalize portions of the Boulevard. o Etiwanda/San Sevaine Regional Storm Drain Investment: $30,000,000 /Direct Jobs Created: 488 This project was necessary to allow many acres of underutilized and vacant residential, commercial and industrial land along the eastern borders of the Project Area to develop and improve. o Haven Avenue Railroad Underpass and Grade Separation Investment: $24,000,0001 Direct Jobs Created: 374 The project improved vehicle circulation and has enhanced safety along the City's primary commercial office corridor by separating train and vehicle traffic. o Foothill Boulevard /Etiwanda Avenue Improvements Investment: $190,000 /Direct Jobs Created: 3 This project, which provided for the construction of block walls and sidewalks along Foothill Blvd. and Etiwanda Ave. enables pedestrians to walk safely along Foothill Boulevard and Etiwanda Avenue without having to face the dangers associated with busy traffic. o Pacific Electric Trail - Phases I I I III and V Investment: $14,000,000 /Direct Jobs Created: 218 The Pacific Electric Trail project, which incorporates a paved section for pedestrians and bicyclists and a softer section of decomposed granite for joggers and equestrian riders, provides a safe, accessible recreation route for community residents and visitors and connects to the 29-mile-long, Rialto-to- Claremont recreation route. • ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT o Major firms paying payroll increased by 1,092 (51 %) from 2000-2010. o Agency efforts have helped attract industry leaders and International investment (Frito-Lay; General Motors; Mercury Insurance; Sharp Electronics; Kumho Tire; Nong Shim America, etc). o More than 17,000 local jobs created from 2000-2010 (39.9% increase). o Public project investments have created millions of dollars in economic value for the community and have created thousands of direct and indirect jobs. o Work force development efforts have provided thousands of employment opportunities for area residents. o Agency resources have supported hundreds of Rancho Cucamonga businesses by providing attraction, retention and expansion assistance. P460 STAFF REPORT-CONSIDL-RA770N TO ADOPI'AN ORIJINANACE COMPL77NG U~fI'FI At3X727, U~-i1Cli PROVIDES PAGE6 FOR THE CONTINUED OPERATION OFTHE RANCFIO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY', fWD AUTFfOA1ZAT10NT0 REMIf'I'0 7HE COUNTY OF SAN I3EIiNARllINO AUDfI'01{-COt\'TROLLF_'R,~27,076,930 (ESfIMATE) IN F'lSCAL YEAR 2077->2AND 86,500,000 (ES"1'IMAIL-~ IN 17SCAL 7TAR 2072-13. • HOUSING o The Agency has assisted in the creation of more than 1,700 affordable rental units for families and 300 affordable rental units for seniors. o Provided down payment assistance to more than 115 individuals and families helping them realize their dreams of home ownership. o Established a Mobile Home Rental Assistance Program to assist more than 120 local income-eligible mobile home owners with their monthly space rent. EDUCATION: $46,394,205 Since FY1987/88, the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency has made pass-through payments to public education including five Rancho Cucamonga K-12 school districts representing 4 high schools; 7 middle schools; and 24 elementary schools; and has supported Chaffey Community College and San Bernardino County Schools. • LIBRARIES: $22,051,389 Since 1993, the Redevelopment Agency has also enhanced education services in the community by investing in the City's two libraries. Agency funding has supported facility construction and renovation, as well as the purchase of a bookmobile, equipment, and books. FIRE SERVICES: $103,379,370 The Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency has supported fire and emergency medical services in its Project Area since 1982. Financial support has assisted with land acquisition; facility construction; construction of an Emergency Operations Center; construction of a maintenance facility and the acquisition of fire equipment and apparatus for four fire stations serving the Redevelopment Project Area. POLICE SERVICES: $10,193,961 The Redevelopment Agency has also assisted in the construction and expansion of the City's police station, and provided renovations and improvements for a substation at Victoria Gardens. LEGAL CHALLENGE Although ABX1 26 and ABX1 27 have been signed into law, both the California Redevelopment Association (CRA) and the League of California Cities have filed a lawsuit to challenge these laws and to confirm in the courts that their provisions are unconstitutional. This lawsuit is based on the fact that in November 2010 voters passed Proposition 22 by an overwhelming majority. The Proposition's language put a stop on State raids of local city. and redevelopment funds, which for Rancho Cucamonga has been valued in 2010 dollars as being in excess of $91.5 million. Despite this clear voter mandate, legislators passed, and the P461 STAFF REPORT-CONSIDF_RATIOii\'i'O ADOPTAIV ORllINANACE COhfPLYING lGfI7~ADX127, IY~FILCFI PROVIDES P.AGE7 FOR TPIE CONTINUED OPL-RfITION OF THE RANCFIO CUCAAIONGA REDF_VELOPLIENI'AGENCY, AND AUTHOR7LATTONTO RL'Mfl'TO THE COUi\77' OF SAN DERNARDINOAUDlTOR-CONTROLLER X27,076,930 (ESTIMATE) IN FISCAL 77~IR 2017-12 AND X6,)00,000 (E.S'TIMATE)11ti' FISCAL. YEAR 2012J3. , Governor signed, ABX1 26 and ABX1 27 in blatant violation of Proposition 22 and the will of the voters. The League of California Cities overturn these unconstitutional and ABX1 27 will result in th "extortion" payments by local agencies t~ elimination of many critical local job-creating and the State. fund revital lopment Association lawsuit seeks to bills. Unless overturned, ABX1 26 evelopment agencies and/or forced State obligations. The result will be the ization projects throughout the Inland Empire The lawsuit also requests the Court to place a "stay" on the implementation of the provisions ABX 1 26 and 27, including the payments that are required to be made. Until the Court issues a final decision on the "stay' and ultimately the lawsuit, the provisions of ABX1 26 and ABX1 27 will remain law and agencies must take action with regard to compliance or non-compliance. In conclusion, staff recommends the Agency approve the attached Ordinance for compliance under ABX1 27. Respectfully submitted, . ~ . p`~ Lin a D. Daniels Deputy City Manager and the California Redeve redevelopment elimination e elimination of many red P462 ORDINANCE NO. 850 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DETERMINING IT WILL COMPLY WITH THE VOLUNTARY ALTERNATIVE REDEVELOPMENT PROGRAM PURSUANT TO PART 1.9 OF DIVISION 24 OF THE CALIFORNIA HEALTH AND SAFETY CODE IN ORDER TO PERMIT THE CONTINUED EXISTENCE AND OPERATION OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga ("City") approved and adopted the Redevelopment Plan for the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Project ("Redevelopment Plan") covering certain properties within the City (the "Project Area"); and WHEREAS, the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency ("Agency") is engaged in activities to execute and implement the Redevelopment Plan pursuant to the provisions of the California Community Redevelopment Law (Health and. Safety Code § 33000, et seq.) ("CRL"); and WHEREAS, since adoption of the Redevelopment Plan, the Agency has undertaken redevelopment projects in the Project Area to eliminate blight, to improve public facilities and infrastructure, to renovate and construct affordable housing, and to enter into partnerships with private industries to create jobs and expand the local economy; and WHEREAS, over the next few .years, the Agency hopes to implement a variety of redevelopment projects and programs to continue to eliminate and prevent blight, stimulate and expand the Project Area's economic growth, create and develop local job opportunities and alleviate deficiencies in public infrastructure, to name a few; and WHEREAS, as part of the 2011-12 State budget bill, the California Legislature has recently enacted and the Governor has signed, companion bills AB 1X 26 and AB 1X 27, requiring that each redevelopment agency be dissolved unless the community that created it enacts an ordinance committing it to making certain payments; and WHEREAS, specifically, AB 1X 26 prohibits agencies from taking numerous actions, effective immediately and purportedly retroactively, and additionally provides that agencies are deemed to be dissolved as of October 1, 2011; and WHEREAS, AB 1 X 27 provides that a community may participate in an "Alternative Voluntary Redevelopment Program," in order to enable a redevelopment agency within that community to remain inexistence and carry out the provisions of the CRL, by enacting an ordinance agreeing to comply with Part 1.9 of Division 24 of the Health and Safety Code; and P463 WHEREAS, the Alternative Voluntary Redevelopment Program requires that the community agree by ordinance to remit specified annual amounts to the county auditor- controller; and WHEREAS, under the threat of dissolution pursuant to AB 1X 26, and upon the contingencies and reservations set forth herein, the City shall make the Fiscal Year 2011- 2012 community remittance, currently estimated to be Twenty Seven Million Seventy Six Thousand Nine Hundred Twenty Nine Dollars ($27,076,929.00), as well as the subsequent annual community remittances as set forth in the CRL; and WHEREAS, the City reserves the right to appeal the California Director of Finance's determination of the Fiscal Year 2011-12 community remittance, as provided in Health and Safety Code Section 34194; and WHEREAS, City understands and believes that an action challenging the constitutionality of AB 1X 26 and AB 1X 27 will be filed on behalf of cities, counties and redevelopment agencies; and WHEREAS, while the City currently intends to make these community remittances, they shall be made under protest and without prejudice to the City's right to recover such amounts and interest thereon, to the extent there is a final determination that AB 1X 26 and AB 1X 27 are unconstitutional; and WHEREAS, the City reserves the right, regardless of any community remittance made pursuant to this Ordinance, to challenge the legality of AB 1 X 26 and AB 1 X 27; and WHEREAS, to the extent a court of competent jurisdiction enjoins, restrains, or grants a stay on the effectiveness of the Alternative Voluntary Redevelopment Program's payment obligation of AB 1 X 26 and AB 1X 27, the City shall not be obligated to make any community remittance for the duration of such injunction, restraint, or stay; and WHEREAS, all other legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Recitals. The Recitals set forth above are true and correct and incorporated herein by reference. Section 2. Participation in the Alternative Voluntary Redevelopment Program. In accordance with Health and Safety Code Section 34193, and based on the Recitals set forth above, the City Council hereby determines that the City shall comply with the provisions of Part 1.9 of Division 24 of the Health and Safety Code, as enacted by AB 1 X 27. P464 Section 3. Payment Under Protest. Except as set forth in Section 4, below, the City Council hereby determines that the City shall make the community remittances set forth in Health and Safety Code section 34194 et seq. Section 4. Effect of Stay or Determination of Invalidity. City shall not make any community remittance in the event a court of competentjurisdiction either grants a stay on the enforcement of AB 1X 26 and AB 1X 27 or determines that AB 1X 26 and AB 1 X 27 are unconstitutional and therefore invalid, and all appeals therefrom are exhausted or unsuccessful, or time for filing an appeal therefrom has lapsed. Any community remittance shall be made under protest and without prejudice to the City's right to recover such amount and interest thereon in the event that there is a final determination that AB 1 X 26 and AB 1X 27 are unconstitutional. If there is a final determination that AB 1X 26 and AB 1X 27 are invalid, this Ordinance shall be deemed to be null and void and of no further force or effect. Section 5. Implementation. The City Council hereby authorizes and directs the City Manager to take any action and execute any documents necessary to implement this Ordinance, including but not limited to notifying the San Bernardino County Auditor- Controller, the Controller of the State of California, and the California Department of Finance of the adoption of this Ordinance and the City's agreement to comply with the provisions of Part 1.9 of Division 24 of the Health and Safety Code, as set forth in AB 1X 27. . Section 6. Additional Understandings and Intent. It is the understanding and intent of the City Council that, once the Agency is again authorized to enter into agreements under the CRL, the City will enter into an agreement with the Agency as authorized pursuant to Section 34194.2, whereby the Agency will transfer annual portions of its tax increment to the City in amounts not to exceed the annual community remittance payments to enable the City, directly or indirectly, to make .the annual remittance payments. The City Council does not intend, by enactment of this Ordinance, to pledge any of its general fund revenues or assets to make the remittance payments. Section 7. CEQA. The City Council finds, under Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, Section 15378(b)(4), that this Ordinance is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") in that it is not a "project," but instead consists of the creation and continuation of a governmental funding mechanism for potential future projects and programs, and does not commit funds to any specific project or program. The City Council, therefore, directs that a Notice of Exemption be filed with the County Clerk of the County of San Bernardino in accordance with CEQA Guidelines. Section 8. Custodian of Records. The documents and materials that constitute the record of proceedings on which these findings are based are located at the City Clerk's office located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. The custodian for these records is Ms. Debra McKay. 3 * C O R R E C T I O N Section 9. Severability. If any provision of this Ordinance or the application thereof to any person or circumstance is held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect other provisions or applications of this Ordinance which can be given effect without the invalid provision or application, and to this end the provisions of this Ordinance are severable. The City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance irrespective of the invalidity of any particular portion thereof. Section 10. Certification; Publication. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and cause it, or a summary of it, to be published once within 15 days of adoption in a newspaper of general circulation printed and published within the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and shall post a certified copy of this Ordinance, including the vote for and against the same, in the Office of the City Clerk in accordance with Government Code § 36933. Section 11. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall become effective thirty (30) days from its adoption. 12. Effective Date. The City Council hereby declares, on t findings set forth above, a xists r finance is necessary to preserve the public peace e y. Accor ing y, ~ ~ ~ do ted as an em ance and shall take effect and be in force immediately upon its adop ion. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council on the 3rd day of August 2011, by the following vote: AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: L. Dennis Michael, Mayor ATTEST: P465 Janice Reynolds, City Clerk P465 Section 9. Severability. If any provision of this Ordinance or the application thereof to any person or circumstance is held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect other provisions or applications of this Ordinance which can be given effect without the invalid provision or application, and to this end the provisions of this Ordinance are severable. The City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance irrespective of the invalidity of any particular portion thereof. Section 10. Certification; Publication. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and cause it, or a summary of it, to be published once within 15 days of adoption in a newspaper of general circulation printed and published within the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and shall post a certified copy of this Ordinance, including the vote for and against the same, in the Office of the City Clerk in accordance with Government Code § 36933. Section 11. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall become effective thirty (30) days from its adoption. Section 12. Effective Date. The City Council hereby declares, on the basis of the findings set forth above, that an emergency exists and that this Ordinance is necessary to preserve the public peace, health and safety. Accordingly, this Ordinance is adopted as an emergency ordinance and shall take effect and be in force immediately upon its adoption. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council on the 3rd day of August 2011, by the following vote: AYES NAYS: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: L. Dennis Michael, Mayor ATTEST: Janice Reynolds, City Clerk STAFF REPORT ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTn3ENT Date: August 3, 2011 To: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager From: Mark A. Steuer, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Subject: UPDATE ON FOOTHILL BOULEVARD CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT BACKGROUND RANCHO C,UCAMONGA The following is an update for the Foothill Boulevard Capital Improvement Project from Grove Avenue to Vineyard Avenue, a multi phased project which is currently under construction. San Bernardino Road to Vineyard Avenue This project was initiated in October 2010 with the removal of the old railroad bridge over Foothill Boulevard at Baker Avenue. The second phase is currently under construction and includes roadway improvements from San Bernardino Road to Vineyard Avenue, construction of the Route 66 Trailhead and construction of the Bike/Pedestrian Pacific Electric Trail Bridge. This phase of construction is scheduled for completion in mid January 2012. The roadway improvements include installation of a median, street lighting, bike lanes, sidewalks and three travel lanes in each direction. After a long delay securing a permit from the Army Corps of Engineers, work on widening-the bridge over Cucamonga Channel has begun with demolition for the portion to be widened. The bridge widening should be completed in eight weeks and the adjacent site work and landscaping will extend into January. The Route 66 Trailhead parking lot is being graded this week. Irrigation, landscaping, asphalt paving and lighting will follow and will continue into January. The restroom structure was installed earlier this year. This facility will provide convenience to the many anticipated users of the Pacific Electric Trail. The location and orientation of the structure was reviewed and approved by the Police Department in regards to visibility and accessibility. The entrances are equipped with open bar lockable doors. In addition, adequate lighting was provided in and around the structure for safety. There will be no tall vegetation planted adjacent to the restroom. All restroom accessories including toilets, stalls, mirrors and sinks are stainless steel and attached with vandal resistant hardware. The Bike/Pedestrian Pacific Electric Trail Bridge will be completed- and open to trail users by October 2011. Engineering is planning a ribbon cutting ceremony in late fall to commemorate the full completion of the Pacific Electric Trail from the westerly City boundary to the easterly City boundary. The first of two concrete pours on the bridge superstructure will be placed this week; 300 total yards of concrete. The second and last concrete pour will follow in about three weeks. In September, Foothill Boulevard will be closed at Baker Avenue for 48 hours for removal of the bridge false work. Grove Avenue to San Bernardino Road Award of this phase is currently on hold due to State legislation to eliminate Redevelopment Agencies. Assuming the City can award the contract this October; we anticipate construction to begin in January 2012 and be completed by July 2012. This phase will install a median, street lighting, sidewalks, bike lanes and two lanes in each direction. Also, final landscaping in the median will be installed from Grove Avenue to Vineyard Avenue. P466 P467 FOOTHILL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT STAFF REPORT AUGUST 27, 2011 PAGE 2 Route 66 Arches The Route 66 Arches at the east and west City limits is scheduled to award concurrently with the Grove Avenue to San Bernardino Road improvements. It is anticipated the arches will take three weeks to install and can be completed in August 2012.. The installation of the pre-fabricated, 112 foot long arches spanning the width of the roadway will require a full night time closure of Foothill Boulevard at each location. In fall of 2012, a ribbon cutting ceremony will be held to celebrate completion of this significant capital project for the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Respectfully submitted, Mark A. Steuer Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer MAS/CB:rlf U W ~O Qa >~ wz J W m W J 0 J ~ =a H~ O~ O~ ~'~' a a v W z W a O z O Q O z z w m z a Q w V W ~O Qa >~ wz ~w m W J O J ~ =a H~ O~ O fa. LL' a a W Z W a O z O Q O z °~ z w m z a V W ~O Qa > ~, wZ J W ~~ m W JO J a _ _ J 0 ~ ~ Q LL a Q U W Z W Q z O °a Z Z W m Z Q Z 0 H U 0 w a Z V H V W ~O Qa >~ wz J W ~~ m J ~ J ~ =a ~~ O~ pa ~a a U z a Q H W U z 0 U U W ~ 0 Qa >~ wZ ~w O~ m> J 0 J ~ =a F- ~ O~ O~ ~a a U W Z W Q D z O °a O z z m Z a a H H U W ~O Qa >~ wZ = W ~~ m ~ J O J ~ =a H~ O~ OQ LL' a a 0 w J_ Q H ~O co H O U W °~o Qa >~ WZ ~w o~ m> ~o ~a 2g H- o oa ~' a a °a J_ Q O ~ # ~ ~ ; ,~,. ~ ~ '. s., ~~ ,, ~• Vii`. ;,~~ O H V O V 0 Z U H V W ~~ ~a w~ J Z ~~ m W J ~ J ~ =a H~ O~ OQ ~a a ,, ~ Q w J co to H O V W ~O Qa >~ wZ ~w m> J ~ _J a =g H- O~ oa ~a a U W Z W Q z O Q O Z °~ z W m Z Q V W ~O Qa >~ WZ J W ~~ m W J ~ J a 2g F- - O -~ Oa ~a a U W Z W Q O z O Q O Z °~ z W m Z Q Q w H V W ~ ~ (~ ~a o w~ JZ ~ m W oW a m> O J~ J ~ =a ~ J O J Q o~ ~ o -t a '~- a ? "!~ U V W ~O Qa >~ wZ ~w m > J ~ J_ ~ _~ H- O~ O~ ~a a v W m a O a Y m Z O H V 0 v O (~ Q z w v ~R V W ~O Qa >~ W Z J W ~~ m ~ J ~ J ~ =a H~ O~ 0 ~ ~a Q U a J a J H W U z 0 U H U W ~O Qa >~ wZ ~w mW J ~ J ~ =a H~ O~ Oa ~a a v Q O O Z z w m a O w w 'a w O a w H U W ~O Qa ~~ WZ J W ~~ mj J ~ J ~ =a H~ O~ Oa u' a a z O 0 O V H x w ~i ~_ Z ~_ ~ ~' ~I H J _~ V H W ~ o N Z J Q ~ H ~ ~ ~ Q W W H ~ a ~ ~ W H W V Q Q W H Q (~ r C~ 1 ~.+~ ^ U ~~ Q a ~~ WZ J W ~~ m > J O J_ ~ 2a J O~ Q 1~a 1, V a 0 J ~_ J V 2 a Q W ra V z a~f ,. ~ ~ ~ i •,1 ~ ~, ~ 1 ll ~ . ~ ' !~ 1 y l ~ ; ~ ~ 1 I f DO 55 ~ 4+' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~ ' ' ~' ~ r i ~ , ~ ~' ~ ~ f . 1 °~ ~ ~~ ~'~' ~ i ,~. -- ~ ~ ~ a ~1 ' ' -~ ~ ; ~. -- ~ `, ~ ~ ~ -, ~ ~ / ~`•.I 1 f ~ ` Y , ~ 1 ', ~ i . i ~ t ~ ~ ~ -, . ~ ti t ,.1. ~ ~ ~1 ~~~ ~ ~~r ,,t ~ ~ ~mww , ~ 4 - `i s ~1 ~ ~, I 'c . 4 f ~ it ~, 1' @I"~ ~ ~ti ,~ W - - ~ ~ ~ Z ~ ~ ~.I l` _ 7 ~ ~ , j Q ` i 4 ~I ~~~ ~- O ~_ ~ ~ y'~ ~ ~ ~' r ~ ~ ~ ~- - V ~ ~ ~Z'1~, L'l' 1 I fi,}~ ; i '!h y Iii ~ ~ 1 r .~ Ifi ~ ~i_ Z O H Q U O J H ~_ J ~_ V H N Q W I W V Q Q W H Q STAFF REPORT REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Date: August 3, 2011 To: Chairman and Members of the Redevelopment Agency Board Jack Lam, AICP, Executive Director From: Linda Daniels, Deputy City Manager By: Tranda Drumwright, Housing Programs Manager Tony Le-Ngoc, RDA Analyst II RANCHO C,UCAMONGA Subject: APPROVAL OF A MODIFICATION TO THE FIRST-TIME HOME BUYER PROGRAM REMOVING THE REQUIREMENT THAT HOMES PURCHASED BE RESTRICTED TO BANK OWNED FORECLOSURES RECOMMENDATION Approval of a modification to the First-Time Home Buyer (FTHB) Program removing the requirement that homes purchased be restricted to bank owned foreclosures. BACKGROUND One of the primary roles of Redevelopment Agencies is to provide affordable, safe and sanitary housing in the community. The Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency has also made it a priority to provide a mix of housing opportunities that include owner, rental, senior, and family housing in the community. The Agency's FTHB Program has been one successful tool in addressing the housing needs in the community. Currently, the FTHB Program provides up to $80,000 in down payment financing for income eligible first-time buyers to assist them with the purchase of a home. Applicants are evaluated to insure that they meet all of the program requirements before being approved. They then work with local real estate agents and lenders to find a property and secure a first loan. Once a property is purchased and all of the required documents are signed, the Agency's loan is secured via a Deed of Trust in second position behind the first loan. There is no interest or payments required by the program while the home is occupied by the buyer. When the home is sold the Agency is paid the initial amount loaned and a percentage of any equity that is gained. ANALYSIS P468 Since the inception of the Agency's FTHB Program in Fiscal Year 1995-96, the Agency has assisted approximately 115 families achieve homeownership. For the most part, the amount of available program funds has met the needs of the applicants. However, in FY P469 APPROVAL OF A MODIFICATION TO THE FIRST-TIME HOME BUYER PROGRAM PAGE 2 REMOVING THE REQUIREMENT THAT HOMES PURCHASED BE RESTRICTED TO BANK OWNED FORECLOSURES AUGUST 3, 2011 2008-09 there was a surge of applicants due to the decline in home prices. To meet this increased demand by our applicants and to assist with the increased number of foreclosed properties in the City, the Agency Board approved modifications to the program. A one time re-allocation of funds was made to the FTHB program to assist ten additional home buyers and a second modification added the requirement that homes to be purchased must be considered a bank owned foreclosure. The Agency's goal of leveraging program funds to help alleviate the onslaught of foreclosed properties in our City was initially successful. With the additional funds, the Agency assisted twenty (20) purchases in that year. Then, in Fiscal Year 2009-10 the Program saw a decline to only eight (8) properties purchased with our assistance. Most recently, in Fiscal Year 2010-11, although over twenty applicants were preapproved for the program only one (1) property was purchased with our assistance. As staff worked with real estate professionals and lenders to understand the marked decrease in activity, the bank owned foreclosed requirement was identified as a major hurdle for potential home buyers. In addition to the foreclosure requirement we have been advised that first time buyers are also being outbid by cash buyers. Most importantly, a large percentage of the available properties in the City are either listed as short sales or at market. Due to these factors, it has been suggested that the bank owned requirement be lifted so that more inventory will be available to first time home buyers. On July 20, 2011, staff presented the above information to the Housing Subcommittee and they recommend the First-Time Home Buyer Program no longer require that properties purchased by participants be bank owned foreclosures. This will allow program participants to select a home listed at market, short sale, or foreclosed. All other program guidelines will remain the same. Respectfully Suyyb~mittFeld, ~~%~~' Linda D. Daniels Deputy City Manager y 0 ~~ O -a o ~~ ~ °' CV ~ o ~ ~ a~ s - v ~ ~_ ~ o i a .~ ~ ~ ~ .~ C ~ I~ ~ p ~ N O N i--- _ 0 O ~ ' ~ ~ ~ O ~ O M W ~ ~ r~ ~ ~ ~ ~ L n , W ~ L r ~ ~I S ]J ~ ~~~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ O ~ ~ ~ • Q~ ,~ O r Q 0 L r ~ L Q ~ ~ ~ ~ ~+ N ~ 4~ N ~ m .X ~ ~ ~.~ L ~_ Q ~ 2 _ ~ ~1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Q~ O ~ ~ U ~-- ~L ~ ~~ a~~ a ~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ L Q . U~ _~ ~~ ~ O~ ~ N ~ ~E > ~ Q ~> N'p ~ C p Y Q- ~... ~ ' .. ~ 2 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~L 0 ~ w _ _ W •W 0 L ~ ~ ~ U ~ U ~ ~~ ~'~ 00 d ~ ~m ~.~ ,4 ~~ ;, 7~ - ^~` s'~ t d•'~ ~+ .~ W W O a~ ~n 0 0 0 0 0 X ~ M O O N ~ N ~ O U M ~ ~ !~ ~ ~ ~ (~> EFT EA EA KT EA ~_ O t ~ N N ~ N M ~ ~ (O ~ ~ O 2 C N C (a (~ ~ (tf U ~ O ~ O O ~ ~ ~ c C ~ L + O ~ ~ y- C ~ ~' ~ O O ~ . O ~ ~ ° U N ~ ~ ~ C O C ~ ~ N ~ ~ O ~ Q ~ ~ L ~ ~U N (a (0 •- fn V ~ L ~ .~ N E ~ N m H N c cB ~ O ~ .~ /~ \ ~--~ L ~N ~ i~ '~ ~+-' ~~ y"~ O U o~ Q • ~ (~ ~ ~ O > > N O ~ ~ N U ~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~~ O ~ N Q' O Q ~ ~_ .~ ~ ~"~ ~_ Q ,~ ~~ 0 ~~ a~ ~_ U '~ Q ~ ~ ~~ ~~ (C3 ~~ O ~ L ~ ~ O t ~ ~ ~ ~ O Y C y-+ C~ C L .~ N ~ L O ~ ~ ~ ~ O .«~ O C N ~ L Uo ~ O O -O N ~ N ~ O NO L Y '~ ~ O ~' E ~ ~ 3 ~ ~ . N (~~ 0 O ~ ~ N N ~ _ ~ Q. +~ ~c ~U o~ ' N y--~ i U ~ - - + ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ ~ m i- Q' ~ ~ ~ ~ U ~~ oo mo O ~Q ~ ~U OU P ~~ N~ ''-'Q ~ CO VN 00 v ~ ~ /U' t~ 'C O / j~ ~ O ~ L N ~ Al ~ O N CO N O ~`~- H CL -L ~ O _ d 7~, - ' ^ ,. ~~ _~ ~~) i "! 01 r~~ ~~ ~~ .~' ~ O ~ ~ .~ O L _~ ~ ~ ~ U ~ ~ ~ (~ ~ O ~ ~ ` 0 Q . > ~ ~ ~ ~ N .~ ~ ~ ~ ~ U ~~ ~ ~ m Q ° °'-~ ~~ O > ~ N ~ ~--+ N ~ fn to Y ~ Q~ N ~ LL U .~~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~~' 3 c~ ~ ~~~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~~~ 3 +., ._ a~ v> a~ ~~ ~ ~ (0 ~_ O ~ ~ ~ ._ ~ ~ L (n U O N ~ ~ i ~ ~ O ~ ~ ~ .~ ~ ° m c~ ~ - O Q~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ a~ ~ Q .E ~ ~ ~ 'co o ° ~ ~ ~ . 0 1t` 1 c~ i L ~_ N N N t/j (Q ~ N ~~ N ~ j N ~ ~ Q O O U ~n N o~ ~ .~ c~ ~`o c~ ~ Y ~_ N ~ ~ N N ~ ~ U C ~~ ~ Qa--' Q~•~ N > ~ O ~ ~ N m ~ ~ ~ ~O~ ~ O C ~ ~ U N~Ct3~ ~ ~~ O Q 0 L ~ +~-'m ~C ~H~O ~~ OY ~~~C ~~ ~~ ~ o~-v ~~~~ ~o~~ oc~E~~n ~~•~ o _O~~ a.., ~ N ~ co ~ ~ ~ (~ O ~ L - R3 ~ U N ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ _~ ~ ~ U ~ ~~., ~ C ~ O ~ Q- L 'V O ~ Q ~ ~ ~ ~ 00 0 ~~ ~ ~~ a~ fn ~ O H ~ Q ~+ ` ~ sZ r.~ /©~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~~ O C C O O ~.+ 0 .~ L L 0 ca L Q .~ ~.+ 0 M 111 O N N ~ •N ~ ~ ~ 0 3 N ~ ti N i~ ~ N ~ •~ ~..i L ~_ V