Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2011/12/21 - Agenda Packetcity of Lt+r < ANCHU ~i,UCAMCINGA 10500 Civic Center Drive ~ Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730-3801 City Office: (909) 477-2700 AGENDAS REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT BOARD PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETINGS 1st and 3^~ Wednesdays 4 7:00 P.M. DECEMBER 21, 2011 ORDER OF BUSINESS CLOSED SESSION Council Chambers ........................... 5:00 P.M. Call to Order Public Communications Tapia Conference Room Conduct of Closed Session City Manager Announcements REGULAR MEETINGS Council Chambers ........................... 7:00 P.M. MEMBERS MAYOR MAYOR PRO TEM COUNCIL MEMBERS L. Dennis Michael Sam Spagnolo William Alexander Chuck Buquet Diane Williams CITY MANAGER CITY ATTORNEY CITY CLERK John R. Gillison James L. Markman Janice C. Reynolds < ~ ,/~ , ~/ r' INFORMATION FOR THE PUBLIC 1~~~ TO ADDRESS THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY. FIRE BOARD. AUTHORITY BOARD AND CITY COUNCIL The Agency, Fire Board, Authority Board and City Council encourage free expression of all points of view. To allow all persons to speak, given the length of the Agenda, please keep your remarks brief. If others have already expressed your position, you may simply indicate that you agree with a previous speaker. If appropriate, a spokesperson may present the views of your entire group. To encourage all views and promote courtesy to others, the audience should refrain from clapping, booing or shouts of approval or disagreement from the audience. The public may address the Agency, Fire Board, Authority Board or City Council by filling out a speaker card and submitting it to the City Clerk. The speaker cards are located on the wall at the back of the Chambers, at the front desk behind the staff table and at the City Clerk's desk. During "Public Communications," your name will be called to speak on any item listed or not listed on the agenda in the order in which it was received. If as part of your eresentation. you would like to display audio or visual material, please see the City Clerk before the meeting commences. If you are present to speak on an "Advertised Public Hearing" item, your name will be called when that item is being discussed. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by the Chair, depending upon the number of individuals desiring to speak. The public communications period will not exceed one hour prior to the commencement of the business portion of the agenda. During this one hour period, all those who wish to speak on a topic contained in the business portion of the agenda will be given priority, and no further speaker cards for these business items (with the exception of public hearing items) will be accepted once the business portion of the agenda commences. Any other public communications which have not concluded during this one hour period may resume after the regular business portion of the agenda has been completed. Any handouts for the Agency, Fire Board, Authority Board or City Council should be given to the City Clerk for distribution. AGENDA BACK-UP MATERIALS Staff reports and back-up materials for agenda items are available for review at the City Clerk's counter, the City's Public Library(-ies) and on the City's website. A complete copy of the agenda is also available at the desk located behind the staff table during the Council meeting. LIVE BROADCAST Agency, Fire Board, City Council and Authority Board meetings are broadcast live on Channel 3 for those with cable television access. Meetings are rebroadcast on the second and fourth Wednesdays of each month at 11:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m. The City has added the option for customers without cable access to view the meetings "on-demand" from their computers. The added feature of "Streaming Video On Demand" is available on the City's website at www.cityofrc.us/cityhall/council/videos.asp for those with Hi-bandwidth (DSUCable Modem) or Low-bandwidth (Dial-up) Internet service. The Agency, Fire Board, Authority Board and City Council meet regularly on the first and third Wednesday of the month at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers located at 10500 Civic Center Drive. Members of the City Council also sit as the Redevelopment Agency, the Fire District Board and the Public Financing Authority Board. Copies of the agendas and minutes can be found @ www.cityofrc.us If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk's office at (909) 477-2700. Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired. Please turn off all cellular phones and pagers while the meeting is in session. ~tt~I~~ ~ Ll1LAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY AND CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DECEMBER 21, 2011 1 A. 5:00 P.M. -CLOSED SESSION CALL TO ORDER -COUNCIL CHAMBERS A1. Roll Call: Mayor Michael Mayor Pro Tem Spagnolo Council Members Alexander, Buquet and Williams CLOSED SESSION CALLED TO ORDER AS THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AND CITY COUNCIL. B. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS ON CLOSED SESSION ITEM S C. RECESS D. CONDUCT OF CLOSED SESSION - TAPIA CONFERENCE ROOM D1. CONFERENCE WITH PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF ETIWANDA AVENUE, NORTH OF BASE LINE ROAD, IDENTIFIED AS 7150 ETIWANDA AVENUE; NEGOTIATING PARTIES: LINDA D. DANIELS, ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA; AND GWEN FROST, PRESIDENT OF THE ETIWANDA HISTORICAL SOCIETY- RDA D2. LABOR NEGOTIATIONS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54954.2 TO GIVE CHRIS PAXTON, HUMAN RESOURCES DIRECTOR, DIRECTION IN REGARDS TO THE MEET AND CONFER PROCESS - FJRE, CJTY E. CITY MANAGER ANNOUNCEMENTS F. RECESS CLOSED SESSION TO RECESS TO THE REGULAR REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY AND CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS AT 7:00 P.M. IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS AT CITY HALL, LOCATED AT 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA. ~\ti~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 4.1~1CAMUNGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY AND CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DECEMBER 21, 2011 2 G. REGULAR MEETING CALL TO ORDER - 7:00 P.M. THE REGULAR MEETINGS OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY AND CITY COUNCIL WILL BE CALLED TO ORDER. IT IS THE INTENT TO CONCLUDE THE MEETINGS BY 10:00 P.M., UNLESS EXTENDED BY CONCURRENCE OF THE AGENCY, FIRE BOARD, AUTHORITY BOARD AND COUNCIL. G1. Pledge of Allegiance G2. Roll Call: Mayor Michael Mayor Pro Tem Spagnolo Council Members Alexander, Buquet and Williams H1. Presentation of Certificates of Appreciation to Rod and Tina Gilfry. H2. Presentation of Certificates of Recognition to Deputies Cundieff and Rayenhartz. This is the time and place for the general public to address the Redevelopment Agency, Fire Protection District, Public Financing Authority Board and City Council on any item listed or not listed on the agenda. State law prohibits the Redevelopment Agency, Fire Protection District, Public Financing Authority Board and City Council from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Agency, Fire Board, Public Financing Authority Board and City Council may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by the Chair, depending upon the number of individuals desiring to speak. All communications are to be addressed directly to the Agency, Fire Board, Authority Board or City Council not to the members of the audience. This is a professional business meeting and courtesy and decorum are expected. Please refrain from any debate between audience and speaker, making loud noises, or engaging in any activity which might be disruptive to the decorum of the meeting. The public communications period will not exceed one hour prior to the commencement of the business portion of the agenda. During this one hour period, all those who wish to speak on a topic contained in the business portion of the agenda will be given priority, and no further speaker cards for these business items (with the exception of public hearing items) will be accepted once the business portion of the agenda commences. Any other public communications which have not concluded during this one hour period may resume after the regular business portion of the agenda has been completed. :I7:1 ~~ t ltl t`.l1LAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY AND CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DECEMBER 21, 2011 CONSENT CALENDARS: The following Consent Calendar items are expected fo be routine and non-controversial. They will be acted upon by the Agency/Fire Board/Authority Board/Council at one time without discussion. Any item may be removed by an Agency/Fire Board/Authority Board/Council J1. Approval of Minutes: December 7, 2011 (Regular Meeting) J2. Approval of Check Register dated November 13, 2011 through December 13, 2011, for the total amount of $234,910.58. J3. Approve to receive and file current Investment Schedule as of November 30, 2011. J4. Approval to accept the "Storm Drain Lift Station Maintenance Project," Contract No. RA11- 004/C011-047, as complete, release the bonds, accept a maintenance bond; approve the Resolution authorizing the Public Works Services Director to file a Notice of Completion, release the retention, and approve the final contract amount of $81,442.30. RESOLUTION NO. RA 11-020 A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR THE STORM DRAIN LIFT STATION MAINTENANCE PROJECT AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK ~~ K. CONSENT CALENDAR -FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT ~~ K1. Approval of Minutes: December 7, 2011 (Regular Meeting) K2. Approval of Check Register dated November 30, 2011 through December 13, 2011, for the total amount of $83,856.44. K3. Approval to receive and file current Investment Schedule as of November 30, 2011 1 2 19 21 22 24 L1. Approval of Minutes: December 7, 2011 (Regular Meeting) ~',~i~ `~ ~~~ C`.uc~noNCn REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY AND CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DECEMBER 21, 2011 M. CONSENT CALENDAR -CITY COUNCIL ~I M1. Approval of Minutes: December 7, 2011 (Regular Meeting) M2. Approval of Check Register dated November 30, 2011 through December 13, 2011, and 29 payroll ending December 13, 2011, for the total amount of $5,957,830.26. M3. Approval to receive and file current Investment Schedule as of November 30, 2011. 57 M4. Approval to receive the Community Services Update. 69 M5. Approval of 2012 Legislative Priorities. 80 M6. Approval to accept the bids received and award and authorize the execution of the contract in the amount of $51,755.60 to the lowest responsive bidder, FS Construction (CO 11-189), 91 and authorize the expenditure of a 10% contingency in the amount of $5,175.56 for the Etiwanda Avenue and 4th Street Sidewalk improvements, to be funded from Account Nos. 1 1 333035650/1 71 71 33-0, 18820002314 AND 11393035650/1780139-0. M7. Approval to accept the "Storm Drain Lift Station Maintenance Project," Contract C011- 047/RA11-004, as complete, release the bonds, accept a maintenance bond; approve the Resolution authorizing the Public Works Services Director to file a Notice of Completion, release the retention, and approve the final contract amount of $81,442.30. RESOLUTION NO. 11-181 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR THE STORM DRAIN LIFT STATION MAINTENANCE PROJECT AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK DISTRICT The following items have been advertised and/or posted as public hearings as required by law. The Chair will open the meeting to receive public testimony. N1. 98 100 101 ELECTORS. REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, ~ . FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, 5 `~` PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY AND L. CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ~~ ~~ "~`~``"~~"`~"`~~~ DECEMBER 21, 2011 RESOLUTION NO. FD 11-052 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, MAKING CERTAIN DETERMINATIONS REGARDING THE PROPOSED ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY (ANNEXATION NO. 11-5) TO AN EXISTING COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT (CFD 85-1) AND CALLING A SPECIAL ELECTION AND AUTHORIZING THE SUBMITTAL OF THE LEVY OF SPECIAL TAXES TO THE QUALIFIED ELECTORS OF SUCH TERRITORY O. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS CITY COUNCIL The following items have been advertised and/or posted as public hearings as required by law. The Mayor will open the meeting to receive public testimony. 01. CONSIDERATION OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR THE WILSON AVENUE EXTENSION -EAST AVENUE AND WARDMAN-BULLOCK ROAD PROJECT RESOLUTION NO. 11-182 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE ENVIRONMENTAL FINDINGS PURSUANT TO THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT, CERTIFYING THE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR THE WILSON AVENUE EXTENSION -EAST AVENUE TO WARDMAN-BULLOCK ROAD PROJECT (SCH 2008071044), ADOPTING A STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS, AND ADOPTING A MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM 02. CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ESTABLISHING A RENEWABLE ENERGY RESOURCES PROCUREMENT PLAN AND ENFORCEMENT PROGRAM PURSUANT TO CALIFORNIA SENATE BILL XI-2 RESOLUTION NO. 11-183 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING A RENEWABLE ENERGY RESOURCES PROCUREMENT PLAN AND ENFORCEMENT PROGRAM PURSUANT TO CALIFORNIA SENATE BILL X1-2 104 112 115 138 142 \R~~~~~ (liLAh4UNGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY AND CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DECEMBER 21, 2011 P. CITY MANAGERS STAFF REPORTS The following items have no legal publication or posting requirements. P1. UPDATE ON DECEMBER CITY-WIDE WIND EVENT 147 P2. APPROVAL OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY FISCAL 149 YEAR 2010/11 ANNUAL REPORT; AUTHORIZE THE TRANSMITTAL OF THE ANNUAL The following items have been requested by the City Council for discussion. Q1. COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS (Comments to be limited to three minutes per Council Member.) S. oral Report (s) I, Debra L. McKay, Assistant City Clerk/Records Manager, of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on December 15, 2011, seventy-two (72) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive. December 7, 2011 RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY CLOSED SESSION MINUTES The Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency held a closed session on Wednesday, December 7, 2011 in the Council Chambers at the Civic Center located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. The meeting was called to order at 5:00 p.m. by Chairman L. Dennis Michael. Present were Agency Members: Bill Alexander, Chuck Buquet, Diane Williams, Vice Chairman Sam Spagnolo and Chairman L. Dennis Michael. Also present were: Debra McKay, Records Manager/Assistant City Clerk and Kathy Scott, Assistant City Clerk. B. ANNOUNCEMENT OF CLOSED SESSION ITEM S The following closed session item is being considered: D1. CONFERENCE WITH PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF BASE LINE ROAD AND DAY CREEK BOULEVARD, IDENTIFIED AS APN 1089-031-35, 1089-031-15 AND 1089-031-16; NEGOTIATING PARTIES: LINDA D. DANIELS, ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA; AND DAVID LINDEN, LEWIS GROUP OF COMPANIES, REGARDING TERMS OF AGREEMENT -RDA No persons were present wishing to speak. The closed session recessed at 5:01 p.m. to the Tapia Room. Closed session began at 5:45 p.m. Present were Agency Members: Bill Alexander, Chuck Buquet, Diane Williams, Vice Chair Sam Spagnolo and Chairman L. Dennis Michael. Also present were: John Gillison, City Manager; Jim Markman, City Attorney and Linda Daniels, Assistant City Manager. E. CITY MANAGER ANNOUNCEMENTS No announcements were made. The closed session recessed at 6:30 p.m. with no action taken. *DRAFT* Redevelopment Agency, Fire Protection District, Financing Authority, City Council Minutes December 7, 2011 -Page 1 of 9 G. REGULAR MEETING CALL TO ORDER - 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS The meetings of the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency, Fire Protection District, Financing Authority and City Council reconvened in the Council Chambers of the Civic Center located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Chairman/PresidentlChairman/Mayor L. Dennis Michael called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. Present were Agency Members/Board Members/Board Members/Council Members: Bill Alexander, Chuck Buquet, Diane Williams, Vice Chairman/Vice President/Vice Chairman/Mayor Pro Tem Sam Spagnolo and Chairman/President/Chairman/Mayor L. Dennis Michael. Also present were: John Gillison, City Manager; Jim Markman, City Attorney; Linda Daniels, Assistant City Manager; Bill Wittkopf, Public Works Services Director; Trang Huynh, Building and Safety Services Director; Mark Steuer, Director of Engineering Services; Police Chief Mike Newcombe; Fire Chief Mike Bell; James Troyer, Planning Director; Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director; Debra McKay, Records ManagerlAssistant City Clerk and Kathy Scott, Assistant City Clerk. H1. Holiday Singing Performance by the Silver Chorale from the James L. Brulte Senior Center. The Silver Chorale sang several musical numbers for the City Council and the audience. 11. Jeri Lee invited the City Council and the audience to the Senior Advisory Committee's pancake breakfast fundraiser at Applebee's on Saturday from 8:00 to 10:00 a.m. 12. Mercedes Machado invited the City Council and the audience to a Christmas concert on December 10, 2011 at Crosslight Church starting at 5:00 p.m. 13. Janet Walton shared a Christmas story and prayed for the City Council. 14. Raymond Herrera noted that there would be a petition rally on Saturday to stop AB 131. 15. Robin Hvidston reported that there would be a California Dream Act Petition Park and Sign event on December 10, 2011 from 12:00 noon to 3:00 p.m. in the Alta Loma Square Vons Shopping Center. 16. John Lyons commented on the winds and thanked the City workers. He spoke about the sacrifices made during World War II and wished everyone a Merry Christmas. CONSENT CALENDARS: The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non-controversial. They will be acted upon by the Agency/Fire Board/Authority Board/Council at one time without discussion. Any item may be removed by an Agency/Fire Board/Authority Board/Counci! Member for discussion. *DRAFT* Redevelopment Agency, Fire Protection District, Financing Authority, City Council Minutes December 7, 2011 -Page 2 of 9 J1. Approval of Minutes: November 16, 2011 (Regular Meeting) J2. Approval of Check Register dated November 8 through November 29, 2011, for the total amount of $1,422,343.13. MOTION: Moved by Spagnolo, seconded by Alexander, to approve the staff recommendations in the staff reports. Motion carried 5-0. K. CONSENT CALENDAR -FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT K1. Approval of Minutes: November 16, 2011 (Regular Meeting) K2. Approval of Check Register dated November 8 through November 29, 2011, for the total amount of $466,055.15. K3. Approval of a Resolution declaring results of a Special Election in Community Facilities District No. 85-1, Annexation No. 11-3 and ordering the annexation of such property to Community Facilities District No. 85-1 (Chase Bank -APN: 1076-011-03). RESOLUTION NO. FD 11-046 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACTING AS THE LEGISLATIVE BODY OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1, DECLARING THE RESULTS OF A SPECIAL ELECTION IN COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1, ANNEXATION NO. 11-3 AND ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF SUCH PROPERTY TO COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1 K4. Approval of a Resolution declaring results of a Special Election in Community Facilities District No. 85-1, Annexation No. 11-4 and ordering the annexation of such property to Community Facilities District No. 85-1 (Laszlo 8~ Maureen Vass, Owners -APN: 0207-022- 56). RESOLUTION NO. FD 11-047 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACTING AS THE LEGISLATIVE BODY OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1, DECLARING THE RESULTS OF A SPECIAL ELECTION IN COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1, ANNEXATION N0.11-4 AND ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF SUCH PROPERTY TO COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1 K5. Approval to adopt an Annexation Map showing Assessor Parcel Number 1100-191-05, (Rancho Victoria Meadows, LLC), located on the west side of East Ave. south of Via Veneto Dr., which is proposed to be annexed into CFD 85-1. RESOLUTION NO. FD 11-048 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACTING AS THE LEGISLATIVE BODY OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1, ADOPTING AN ANNEXATION MAP (ANNEXATION NO. 11-6) SHOWING PROPERTY PROPOSED TO BE ANNEXED TO COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1 `DRAFT' Redevelopment Agency, Fire Protection District, Financing Authority, City Council Minutes December 7, 2011 -Page 3 of 9 K6. Approval to adopt a Resolution of Intention to Annex Territory referred to as Annexation No. 11-6 (APN: 1100-191-05, Rancho Victoria Meadows, LLC), into Community Facilities District No. 85-1, specifying services proposed to be financed, to set and specify the special taxes proposed to be levied within the annexation territory and set a time and place for a public hearing related to the annexation. RESOLUTION NO. FD 11-049 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACTING AS THE LEGISLATIVE BODY OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO AUTHORIZE THE ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY (ANNEXATION NO. 11-6) TO COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1 K7. Approval to adopt an Annexation Map showing Assessor Parcel Numbers 0208-153-12, 13 & 24, (California Liberty Investment, LLC), located on the northeast corner of Foothill Blvd. and Klusman Ave., which is proposed to be annexed into CFD 85-1. RESOLUTION NO. FD 11-050 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACTING AS THE LEGISLATIVE BODY OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1, ADOPTING AN ANNEXATION MAP (ANNEXATION NO. 11-7) SHOWING PROPERTY PROPOSED TO BE ANNEXED TO COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1 K8. Approval to adopt a Resolution of Intention to Annex Territory referred to as Annexation No. 11-7 (APNs: 0208-153-12, 13 & 24, California Liberty Investment, LLC), into Community Facilities District No. 85-1, specifying services proposed to be financed, to set and specify the special taxes proposed to be levied within the annexation territory and set a time and place for a public hearing related to the annexation. RESOLUTION NO. FD 11-051 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACTING AS THE LEGISLATIVE BODY OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO AUTHORIZE THE ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY (ANNEXATION NO. 11-7) TO COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1 MOTION: Moved by _, seconded by _, to approve the staff recommendations in the staff reports. Motion carried 5-0. L1. Approval of Minutes: November 16, 2011 (Regular Meeting) MOTION: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Alexander, to approve the minutes. Motion carried 5-0. M. CONSENT CALENDAR -CITY COUNCIL *DRAFT* Redevelopment Agency, Fire Protection District, Financing Authority, City Council Minutes December 7, 2011 -Page 4 of 9 M1. Approval of Minutes: November 16, 2011 (Regular Meeting) M2. Approval of Check Register dated November 8 through November 29, 2011, and payroll ending November 29, 2011, for the total amount of $7,350,852.28. M3. Approval to reject all bids received for the Red Hill Park, Heritage Park and East Beryl Park Shade Shelter Project and approval of a Resolution to authorize the advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bids" for the Red Hill Park, Heritage Park and East Beryl Park Shade Shelter Project, to be funded from Accounts 1025001-5650/1698025-0 (Capital Reserve), 1025001- 5650/1740025-0 (Capital Reserve) and 1025001-5300/0-6963 (Capital Reserve) respectively as approved in FY 2011/2012 Budget. RESOLUTION NO. 11-174 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE "RED HILL PARK, HERITAGE PARK AND EAST BERYL PARK SHADE SHELTER PROJECT" IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS M4. Approval of Plans and Specifications for "Citywide Street Name Sign Replacement - FY 11/12" and authorize the City Clerk to advertise the "Notice Inviting Bids" to be funded from Account Number 1025001-5300 (Capital Reserve) as approved in the FY 2010!2011 Budget. RESOLUTION NO. 11-175 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE "CITYWIDE STREET NAME SIGN REPLACEMENT - FY 11/12 PROJECT" IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS M5. Approval to declare surplus City-owned miscellaneous vehicles and equipment, office equipment, and computer equipment (please see attached; items indicated have been deemed no longer needed, obsolete or unusable. M6. Approval to execute Professional Services Agreements (CO 2011-180 thru 183) with the City of Rancho Cucamonga for the Rancho Cucamonga Public Finance Authority refunding revenue bonds. M7. Approval to accept grant revenue in the amount of $319,151 from the 2011!2012 State of California Supplemental Law Enforcement Fund into Account No. 1354000-4740 and authorization to appropriate $319,151 into Account No. 1354701-5300. M8. Approval to accept grant revenue in the amount of $3,500.00 awarded by State Farm Insurance to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Emergency Management program into Account No. 3281000-4905 (Grant Revenue) and approval to appropriate funds into Account 3281503-5200 (Emergency Management Program) for the completion of a Community Emergency Preparedness Guide. M9. Approval to purchase replacement play equipment from Landscape Structures, Inc., for the Lions Park Playground, utilizing a Competitively Bid Cooperative Agreement awarded by Houston-Galveston Area Council (HGAC Contract No. PR 11-10), and authorize the expenditure of $109,137.11 plus a 2% contingency to be funded from Account 1120305- 5650/180120-0 M10. Approval to appoint William Wittkopf, Public Works Services Director, as representative of the City of Rancho Cucamonga on the West Valley Mosquito and Vector Control (WVMVC) District Board of Trustees. *DRAFT* Redevelopment Agency, Fire Protection District, Financing Authority, City Council Minutes December 7, 2011 -Page 5 of 9 M11. Approval to adopt the Accumulation Program for part-time and limited service employees (The Apple Plan) to provide retirement benefits to part-time and temporary employees of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District. RESOLUTION NO. 11-176 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE ADOPTION OF THE ACCUMULATION PROGRAM FOR PART-TIME AND LIMITED SERVICE EMPLOYEES (THE APPLE PLAN) TO PROVIDE RETIREMENT BENEFITS TO PART-TIME AND TEMPORARY EMPLOYEES OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT. M12. Approval to execute an agreement (CO 11-184) regarding levy of special taxes within Improvement Area No. 3 of Community Facilities District No. 2001-01 of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, among the Restorative Justice Center of the Inland Empire, Foothill Crossing, LLC and the City of Rancho Cucamonga. M13. Approval of Improvement Agreement Extension for DRC2007-00247, located on the southwest corner of Arrow Route and Utica Avenue, submitted by Transam Development Co. RESOLUTION NO. 11-177 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR DRC2007-00247 M14. Approval of release of Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement for 10700 Jersey Boulevard (CO 11-185), located on the north side of Jersey Boulevard., east of Haven Avenue (APN: 0209-491-23). RESOLUTION NO. 11-178 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RELEASING OF REAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT FOR 10700 JERSEY BLVD. LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF JERSEY BOULEVARD EAST OF HAVEN AVENUE (APN 0209-491-23) M15. Approval to release of Maintenance Guarantee Bond No. 0528959A, in the amount of $40,114.41, for the Calle Vejar Street Improvements from approximately 150' west of Avenida Leon to Avenida Castro and Avenida Leon Street Improvements from Arrow Route to Calle Vejar Project, Contract No. 10-026. MOTION: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Williams, to approve the staff recommendations in the staff reports. Motion carried 5-0. The following items have no legal publication or posting requirements. *DRAFT* Redevelopment Agency, Fire Protection District, Financing Authority, City Council Minutes December 7, 2011 -Page 6 of 9 N1. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PUBLIC FINANCE AUTHORITY AUTHORIZING AND PROVIDING FOR THE ISSUANCE OF SPECIAL TAX REFUNDING REVENUE BONDS, APPROVING THE FORM OF AN INDENTURE OF TRUST, BOND PURCHASE AGREEMENT, SPECIAL TAX REFUNDING BONDS PURCHASE CONTRACT, PRELIMINARY OFFICIAL STATEMENT, CONTINUING DISCLOSURE CERTIFICATE, AND OTHER DOCUMENTS, AND AUTHORIZING CERTAIN ACTIONS IN CONNECTION WITH THE ISSUANCE OF SUCH REVENUE BONDS O1. CONSIDERATION TO ADOPT A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACTING FOR AND ON BEHALF OF ITSELF AND IN ITS CAPACITY AS THE LEGISLATIVE BODY OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2000-01 (SOUTH ETIWANDA), COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2000-02 (RANCHO CUCAMONGA CORPORATE PARK) AND COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2001-01, AUTHORIZING AND PROVIDING FOR THE ISSUANCE OF SPECIAL TAX REFUNDING BONDS FOR EACH SUCH COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT, APPROVING THE FORMS OF FISCAL AGENT AGREEMENTS, A BOND PURCHASE AGREEMENT, A SPECIAL TAX REFUNDING BONDS PURCHASE CONTRACT, ESCROW AGREEMENTS, A PRELIMINARY OFFICIAL STATEMENT AND OTHER DOCUMENTS AND AUTHORIZING CERTAIN ACTIONS IN CONNECTION WITH THE ISSUANCE OF SUCH BONDS Ingrid Bruce, GIS/Special Districts Manager presented the staff report on N1 and 01. Council Member Buquet requested a copy of the map that was presented at the meeting. MOTION: Moved by Alexander, seconded by Williams, to adopt Resolution No. PFA 11-002. Motion carried 5-0. * DRAFT* Redevelopment Agency, Fire Protection District, Financing Authority, City Council Minutes December 7, 2011 -Page 7 of 9 RESOLUTION NO. PFA 11-002 REFUNDING BONDS FOR EACH SUCH COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT, APPROVING THE FORMS OF FISCAL AGENT AGREEMENTS. A BOND PURCHASE RESOLUTION NO. 11-179 MOTION: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Alexander, to adopt Resolution No. 11-179. Motion carried 5-0. P. CITY MANAGERS STAFF REPORTS CITY COUNCIL The following items have no legal publication or posting requirements. P1. DEVELOPMENT CODE UPDATE STATUS REPORT AND REVIEW OF PROPOSED CHANGES James Troyer, Planning Director, presented the staff report. In response to Council Member Buquet, the Planning Director indicated that the sign ordinance would be revised as part of the update. Also, Mr. Troyer confirmed that he was meeting with the Chamber of Commerce about these proposed changes. James Troyer discussed with Mayor Michael the proposed incentives to meet green building standards, including a very minor increase in floor area or lot coverage and/or a small density unit bonus. Also discussed were the proposed changes to monument signs. In response to Council Member Alexander, Mr. Troyer noted that there would be a workshop in March and anticipated that the development code would be adopted in May. Also discussed was using business licenses to engage community members who are not members of the Chamber of Commerce. This was done in the first community workshop. Q. COUNCIL BUSINESS Q1. COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS (Comments to be limited to three minutes per Council Member.) Council Member Williams had attended the ribbon cutting ceremony today and congratulated the Engineering Department for the new bridge over the pedestrian/equestrian trail. Mayor Pro Tem Spagnolo shared that the men and women serving aboard the military ships that enter and leave Pearl Harbor will stand at attention on the deck and salute the USS Arizona Memorial when passing it. He thanked the Police Department for the recent Shop with a Cop activity and commented on his recent visit to the Family Resource Center. Council Member Buquet noted that the recent windstorm was much more severe than people realize and indicated that there will be a report on this at the next City Council meeting. He appreciated the fact that the pedestrian/equestrian trails were so popular and expressed a concern with the safety of people frequenting the trail. Perhaps a flashing strobe light on street crossings could be installed. Q2. LEGISLATIVE AND REGIONAL UPDATES (Oral) Mayor Pro Tem Spagnolo reported that Legislative Analyst Office has called for trigger cuts as General Fund revenues are expected to be $3.7 billion below the level assumed in the budget. This revenue shortfall would translate into $2 billion of trigger cuts to various state programs including all of the "Tier 1"trigger cuts to higher education and health and human services and about three-fourths of the "Tier 2" reductions to k-12 education. Mayor Pro Tem Spagnolo reported that President Obama has signed the 2012 spending bill hat sets 2012 budgets for five Cabinet-level departments, as well as NASA and a number of smaller agencies. The measure also extends short-term funding for other agencies until Dec. 16 at close to last year's levels. However, he noted that the super committee has failed to reach agreement on a solution to *DRAFT* Redevelopment Agency, Fire Protection District, Financing Authority, City Council Minutes December 7, 2011 -Page 8 of 9 reduce the growing $15 trillion government debt. Lastly, he noted that the Governor is asking voters to approve a tax increase to close the state's chronic budget deficit. R. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING No items were identified. Mayor Michael adjourned the meeting at 8:13 p.m. in remembrance of the 70~h anniversary of the attack on Pearl Harbor and in memory of Dale Downs. Respectfully submitted, Debra L. McKay, MMC Assistant City Clerk/Records Manager Approved: * * * *DRAFT* Redevelopment Agency, Fire Protection District, Financing Authority, City Council Minutes December 7, 2011 -Page 9 of 9 RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Agenda Check Register 11/30/2011 through 12/13/2011 Check No. Check Dale Vendor Name Amoum AP 00317526 2011/11/301 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 23.86 AP 00317539 2011/11/301 HDL COREN AND CONE 1,400.00 AP 00317548 2011/11/301 INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 12.81 AP 00317558 2011/11/301 LEARNING EXPRESS 4,]81.00 AP 00317577 2011/1 ]/301 NINYO & MOORE 11,590.00 AP 00317666 2011/12/071 RICHARDSWATSONANDGERSHON 463.40 AP 00317675 2011/12/071 SHAW INTEGRATED SOLUTIONS 10,907.88 AP 00317726 2011/12/071 COMMUNITY BANK 27,447.58 AP 00317728 2011/12/07 1 COURTNEY, MICHAEL 465.97 AP 00317729 2011/12/07 l DAN GUERRA AND ASSOCIATES 6,905.00 AP 00317742 2011/12/07 l GARCIA NAREZ CONSTRUCTION INC 8,800.00 AP 00317750 2011/12/07 ( INLAND EMPIRE ECONOMIC PART-NERSHIP 7,500.00 AP 00317754 201 I/12/07 ( INTEGRITY DOOR & HARDWARE INC 2,689.97 AP 00317770 2011/12/071 MCMURRAY STERN INC 6,850.00 AP 00317771 201 I/12/071 MESA ENERGY SYSTEMS INC 35,282.00 AP 00317771 2011/12/071 MESA ENERGY SYSTEMS INC -3,528.00 AP 00317783 2011/12/071 NATIONAL NOTARY ASSOCIATION 69.00 AP 00317798 2011/12/07 ( AUFBAU CORPORATION - 6,220.00 AP 00317798 2011/12/07 ( AUFBAU CORPORATION 49,610.00 AP 00317802 2011/12/07 ( C2 REPROGRAPHICS ~ 16,067.90 AP 00317803 2011/12/07 ( CABLE INC. ~ 894.60 AP 00317808 2011/12/07 ( CORENET GLOBAL 4,335.00 AP 00317814 2011/12/071 DUNK EDWARDS CORPORATION 458.64 AP 00317814 2011/12/071 DUNN EDWARDS CORPORATION 500.75 AP 00317819 2011/12/07 l G AND M BUSINESS INTERIORS 652.22 AP 00317843 2011/12/08 ( GENERATOR SERVICES CO 3,350.00 AP 00317854 2011/12/08 ( SCORPION BACKHOE -3,327.00 AP 00317854 2011/12/08 ( SCORPION BACKHOE -112.00 AP 00317854 2011/12/08 ( SCORPION BACKHOE 900.00 AP 00317854 2011/12/08 ( SCORPION BACKHOE -90.00 AP 00317855 2011/12/08 1 SCORPION BACKHOE 33,270.00 AP 00317855 2011/12/081 SCORPION BACKHOE 1,120.00 Total for Entity: 234,910.58 P1 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 1 Current Date: 12/15/: Report; CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 07:5 P2 m O E U U K O T U C d a O ~~ r (Q r d ~ ~ N Oi ~ ~ £ O !C C 7 M C ~ N d p ~ a ~~ ~ d O O Z ~ oa oa t V c ___-_ V '=Z U ° 1 T.. ~' ~ I~ --'~U 7 O b fD O ~ O ~ M~ j V O~ f N n N n W O ~ O N M f> m N a m m t~f O N m 10 l0 'C O r ~ O O b C1 t N q « ' N ~ 0 1~0 ~ ~ y b ~ 0 ~ I N N N o? v m m a o e N o O O N O l7 Y f m O 0 a N N W M ~ O 7 p H O A of Oi O r uj 1n ~ 1°> w ~ N ° !~ ~ b 0 b a _ r N t'I N Ol b a N q A A n P r 17 N b N N d j N 0~ 0 O m n v i m n f m of N o o ~ of n q M CI N b N f1 O~ I~ N O 1 O O_ ~ A O ~ ~ N ° ~ '1 ° m ~ m m a e N N _ ~ N N y N O O O m p a° b o 0 o b „l q O~ N O C O q~ to O M 1 O O O O ~ O n ° ° ° ~ rv n o v ~ ry of of b of ~ a N y N N c d m c c g lL V g ~. ° E w v N j g W C U ~ C y' m d ° c m N m m ¢ Z n a a N C LL r E c q d c y C o q E 'u d ~ ~ a ~ ~ C ~c q U°q y ~S~ U b NC U ab H L vs v ~ E m9 b i U C O n E .. y c z m F N b y d C_ r_ ya .L. N O N T a O v U q ¢ E o_ m O q N t 10 p n x b a C y y n~ 0 a ~ q N U E ~ O nV c a o b ~ d n ~n n ~ q N N ~ ~ ~- O ~ O) ] 3 10- ~° b ~ c O) N ry t `m n a = m Y ~ t U A ~ 3 d O r 'V b € `~ LL ~ O b C b U ~ ~ O N n a c ~ 3 q o Z b N O C b N C Ol a E b c m n a w d C_ N n n N c G a 1° C E C ~ n q O w ~ ° ' a - L Oi Op b OI jp o n n,_, n ~ M T c o N U U1 V C M d r .A- Q N ~ y a -mow E '° - > i ~ ~ m d ° ~ W Z ~ C y ~rU ~ q D ~ o. N ~ N ~ o u ~ r N C ~ O U a A d Z C q y .- y m O y u! :°. OI ~` .q.~ « N p C ~ '~ q > E N ~ ~ ~ ~ d S ~ u a°i w E = f U Q w ~¢ i a n b a w C O E `o a v O q d U LL L 3 w d E N d N ca _ C a~ c ° q b L ry q .. U o O C m m ~ E E m p C to y a E C y q r a ~ b m` i ~ C QI O V E ~ d d~ ~ O U ° ~ a ° T b ~ qaT q ~- C O O _~ m° c O C q y ot. Q O x ~ m r o o O ° N p MS N ~~ N ~. .U N d O ~ 0 a D tU U d N da H ~ d c J J Q Q N m ° E 1 o °, _ o ¢ m° a° °~ f a 0 O r N ~ m D O a e ~ a O o a K s' P3 « CJ ('J N N ' ` b b U] f0 (O (d (d N (7 ^ (7 1+1 ' Q b f (O b fD b f0 b ^ ' b (O d L q O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O Q ~ J G N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N ~ n q N < O m P 17 b fD (d ~ l~ N 0 Q Y Q Q N Q n N n n~ ~ O n m OI n Q ~ N a ~ O` O N O S N N _ A N N N N N N N N~ N N N O N N O ~ ~ 17 ~ (~ IO fD n ~ N b W 0 ~ (~ r !~ O fp m n e ~ fD C1 ~ ' ~ 0 ~ N N p, «D O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ O O 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 W I 6 r d L N N O W N g N b Q b f0 Id W O W W O b n W Q ~ n W W N n m 0 f0 O m p` f A ~ N W ~ b Q fp K d ~ Ty Q Q N l7 b N Ip b t7 Q fd b O W fD O f0 m ~ W b n OI < b a O q _ f_ '' ^^ ^ ' f f ' ~ f f r b O b O C'J O O b N O M O O O f N b O O O O O b O ~l1 O W O W O O O O O M 1p O m N W l7 t7 b b n O O N N O O O O O n O O O N V] N O Q O W n m fp b n W O n b Q O b (7 O fp M fp b W O l~l b M n O Ip W O W O O N N N ~ ~ N N ~ ~ N r ~- ~- (7 N ~ N ~ ~ ~ N ~ N ~ ~ N ~ N ~ ~ N N N T g q q q ry q ry q ry q ry q g q q q q q q ry q ry q ry q g q q q q q q q q q ry q q q q D Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q O O d 9 O O b b O O O O O O O O O b O O O b O O O O O b O O O O O O O O r d q O Q p b O H N !d fd O O W b b N O O n f0 O b N n n fd Q N~ b O O N 0 O (O t7 0 0 0 f0 b b 0 n O O l7 b b O O N n O b b W n O O m - ~ C O N N N ~ ~ N N ~ ~ N ~ ~ ~ M N ~ N ~ ~ ~ N ~ N ~ ~ N ~ N ~ ~ N N y d N N f0 r fd N m O N W O O W O ^ O N ~ m 0 O O O O O O Cl O (p O b O O J b b ~ n l7 O b O Q fD b O W O O Q b m O O O O O O O m O b O n O O m W 0 b fp m fd W O O m n O N O b O n O O O O O O O O O Cl O b O n O O N 1`t Q O Id N f0 Ip O n W m O O O W S 0 0 0 O O O O O O Q O b O (7 O O y m m n b ~l] W_ b O n Q 0 O n O O W n n O O O O O O O Q O O O b O O p n n m Q m m n n O m n b O CI O W O b W 01 O O O O O O O m O (D O N O O d n n m W m m m o W m W o w o 0 o m m W 0 0 0 o 0 o O 0 o m O m O o m M 17 O W W W W O m m m b O O O W W W O O O b O O W O W O W O O N m (7 fl a p p C] N Cj p N r M Q b N Q N l7 Q t7 Q N N N Q Q b Q b N ~[I N d N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 J b N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W ; W m Q b N O b m O N O l7 O Q O O b b ~ W O ~ fp n N W O O O b O N b N C lh W m b b O QQ b n (7 f0 W fd b m W m b b W N b fd N W n m N N n b O (O t O ~ m Q O n O Q Q b W b Q W Q n O O b 0 l7 ~ W f0 (7 Q III111~~, N n n n h O O O ~ O N n p W m l7 O df O CI N n b W N 0 n Cl O W n N W 0 Q (7 N W m b m f ~ b b 0 ` O) A f0 O O O O O f f O N O W ^' O n O O O O n t7 O N N O b O O W O O O O O ~ m O O O N O q ~ N m Q l7 N b b Q ~lI Q b 1+1 ~ p (7 1n b b m Q Q 1+1 Q N N N t7 b b b b M b b ^ y Y Y O ~+ C ^, W ^C, W ~ r d ~ y r ~ d ~ N ~ n ~ ° ° ° ° ° ° ° ° ° ° ° ° ° o ° ° ° ° ° ° ° ° ° ° ° o ° ° ° ° ° ° m o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o m o o o o o o o o o o N~ C q m W W Ih O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O {L wwt~ ~y ~ Q ~ d1 m O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O ~ L~ M a n r o 0 0 0 0 0 0 o c b o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o c c c o 0 0 0 0 0 0 o c c ~~ N a n W ~ o O 0 0 0 b O O 0 0 0 O O O 0 0 0 O O O 0 0 0 b O O 0 0 0 O O O 0 0 0 O O O 0 0 0 O O b 0 0 0 O O O 0 0 0 O O O 0 0 0 O O O 0 O ~ C ' N Q m N N N Q b Q b m ~ Q Q N N b M y y M y N N N Q b N 1n N t7 N N C C a N C « o m ~ E• o d v ~ 0 0 Z r O O O ^' O O O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O O U N q q O O O O O O O O O O O " f O O O f O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O /~ ~ iL Y^ N N N N N N N N N N N N N_ N N_ N N N N N N N N N N_ N N N N N N N O ? O ~~ N W N ~~ Q O Q M m N N N W N L o a O M N W M t0 l~ !O d o ~~ 0 0 ~ l~ ~ a N N Q~ t~ N N O O N t0 t0 r .N N N fV ~ ~ O O ~ N N N N ~L O O O O O O O O O O ~- O O O O O O O O e- O O O O O O C d d c N ~ n a a a a a a a q m N 0 0 0 O O O O Q r Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y U' O (~ U' (') (7 (~ ^ ~ Z Z 2 Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y ~~~ ~~~ ~ Z N Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z ~ D] Rf ¢] QI fL 6I m G] Gl fL tl1 m m Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q O O U U O O O LL F F H F 1- V- H r r f H F F m m m m m m m m m m m m ~~~ ~~~ ~ y O ^^^ ^^^ ^ 0^ ^^^ Z Z Z 2 Z Z 2 Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z 2 2 Z Z ~ W W W W W W W W W W W W W Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Z K K K K K K K ¢ K K K K K 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U U U U U U U U U U U V U J J J J J J J J J J J J > ~ ~~~ ~~~ ~~~ ~~~ W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W U d K K K K K K K K K K K K K ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ y Z m Q Q Q Q Q Q Q QQQ Q Q Q O O O D U O O O O O O O O U O O O O O ' ~ ~ LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL 2 S S 2 2 2 2 S S 2 S S 2 2 S 2 S S S N d Q J Q QQ K QJQ QJQ QJQ K K K QJQ QJ QJQ K~ K QQ QQ QQ K K K QJ QJ QJ K K K aJa QJ QJQ K a' K QJQ Q QQ K a' K QQ QJQ ~ K K QJ QJ QJ K K K QJ QJ Q K K K Q Q Q K K K QJQ K Q 9 W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W U ~ ^ ^ ^ p O O ^ O O O O ^ ^ ^ O ^ ^ O O ^ ^ ^ ^ O O ^ ^ ^ O ^ ^ ^ V LL W J 9 LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL I i LL LL LL LL O O C N 6 c c d E LL o U Q b b m O ~ W b N 0 Q m p V b n W fp N b n fD N t7 ~ n m N W > d b n n m O Q Q Q W W O ~ N b b O W t7 (p b W m O O N 10 fp b n n 1~ n N J d b C j U ~` C C ~ m Q u a m h ~ Y W d' LL o m ~ 0 ° rn N v Q m a s> Y O Q ~ 6 ~ U ' K 6~ e S J Q U Z F H > d n e ? .n U' ¢ U' O '' Y Y Y Y Y Y ~/1 ~/) 3 > >> LL LL a W t7 in w n Q Q b N .. a N ° d i n ` ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ X X X X X n n n n n n n OU' f7 C7 n O m m e n N N E m m m W of n w m N m m m m n n ~n N m Q Q Q Q e~ Q ~ 0 7 O > y m W W CJ C] (7 m m m m W m n m N m m m m n c'i ~~ W m m m m n U J N LL m m ei n n M m m m m m n m n e~ m io m m m n n of N N m m m n m ei n ? rc P4 N F m m b m m b N Q Q b b Q b Q m Q m m m y 'C N O O O O O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O O O ~ 7 O N N N O m N N N ~ N N N C N N N N N N N N N q ! ) O 1 Q I O n N N 0 O r O] A 10 0 a ~ N N M f0 1~ N ~ ~ ~ (~ O h 0 (~ N N ~ r N N N N r f0 f~ N N N !~ O O 0 0 0 0 ~ o 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ o ~ o QD m N m I~ b b n Q m r m O Q O P1 W A~ m n O N Q n m n W m t0 m n N O m m ~ b 1~ n Q Ol W N W N O fp r 1~ n n O O O O O O O O m O O N O O O O m O O CJ O O b b O O` N O O O 1~ N O N N m O m N W 1~ W N N n n b O N O m Q N N ~ ~ lh ~ ~ N N r ~- ~ N ~ N ~ m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m ~~ a ¢" a s a" a" ¢m a a" a a a ¢m a s am Y C a Q ~ C d d ~ N ~ y ~ C N ~ ~0 - O ~p C ~ M ~ ~ y ~ O ~ r ~ O y ~ Dm V ~ O O ~a~Z 0 O t a v c A 0 W a~ ~ N Y m Y O m ~~ m L 0 a' O O O O O b O O O O O O O O O O O b O O O O O N O m O O O m N O O N O 1~ b O m N b I~ m N N r n b O C9 O b W ~ N N ~ ~ (7 ~ ~ N N ~ ~ ~ N ~ N ~ ~ ... .... ....:e ~el68is o a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o c o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o c o 0 0 0 0 O O O O N O O b O b m O O O O O O VOI N (7 N Cl N b m m (7 N N b b N b b M N _~~~~m~~~~~~~~~~~~ sssssSSSSSSSSSSSSs N N N` N N N N N N N\ N N N N N ~ W m Q h _Q [~ Q_ !~ (~ N m Q n W n fp 0 N N N ~ O N N ~ N N N N N N ~~ 1~ m ~ a r [~ l~ S O N N t0 m I~ O O 0 0 0 0 ~ o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 °o, 0 0 DO1 0 b m q m K K K LL' C W m O O 0 0 0 ry r r r r r N ~~~~~ Z Z Z Z Z 2 2 Z Z Z Z Z Z m O O O O O b N to N N N N N N (/1 fn b h ~~~ ~~ U1 fn N N N N fA b N N b b b Z Z 2 2 Z ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ 0 0 0 0 o r r r r r r r r r r r r r J J J J J~~~ W W W W W J J J J J J J J J J J J ~~ E E~~ r r r r r r r r r r r r m O O O O O ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ m ~ S S S S S Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z ~ m < QJ QJ J QJQ QJQ QJ QJ Q QQ QQ <Q QQ QQ QQ QJ QJ QJ m m K K K~ K K K K K K K K K K C K K K ¢ W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0^ O D^ 0 0 0 0 0 ~ W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W m LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL O a ~ O m c a m ~ E o m U m b O M N O b t7 Q OW b ~ m b Q m O j m O N 1p 1~ r m W W O O O N N b VI T C m Q m m m m W in m b m N Q m b m W w J a a g w ~ m LL U w X O x K c7 Q q N N N i5 N m m m W C7 ~~ R' ~ O W O m U~ (~ (~ C') (~ LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL evi e~ ~ ~i M M M M m n n ~~ m m m m ~ d U LL m N N m m M n in in m N n n N N m m m N ~ I Q N N N N N N N im ~ N (O •- ~ l7 n a ~ N ~ ~ O ~ o ~ 0 0 0 h O Q b m l7 N l7 N O M O W N m r (p e'1 W l7 N ~ m 0 b O N N Q W N N O O m m m ¢ ¢ ¢ O O m O O O O O O O b O fp O O N N r O m N N N m W m m W W OWI N Q Cl O m O b m o °m ~ M N O 0 0 CJ b °o °O 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O W b m m N N N ~ N s? W W r r m Q N m m n b O m N °o 0 0 O m n b n 0 A O O z z a > > m K K d J ~ ~ Ul N ¢ a c K K m r r ~ O a H c 0 a O °0 0 U m d V m N Q ~ ~ m ~ m m m N N 41 N N F m m ~~~I i °e [3 N N _N N N m O O O n r b U ~ f_n F ~ y ^ O m m K Z O W U Z Q r O 3 < z ~ w a t ~ ¢ m V W U m Q W b O y b Q > Q > m ~ O K 3 O a N ~ m Q N m V O 00 N Q a 3 r ~ J ~U n m t¢o C m t0 O rC a `` n 0 Q O_ E O al ~ ~ d a d C A O C P5 v oa f m ~ a o E ~~ o a ~ ~p q N ~ O y a 6 0 ~ A a d 9 N a Yf b N N ~~~ m y q 1 N a ~ Yy A 0 0 /~ Q M O ~ d ~ N C d ~ r d ~ y r ~ d ~ N ~ m ~ C l0 - O j n m ~ C ~ M ~ {p y ~ a r O ~ ~ ~ N C C O Q V ~ Q Q Z v ° d ~ a ~ 0 e ° L S V a' C m v N ~ ~ c m ~ Qm r rv `u y m rv ~ `a N ~ Q 9 C N N Y O H C N E n m c 0 i" e a a 1n p V K P6 a ~ Q a ry O Q ~ m a ~ ° f .d. Z' q ~ ~ M N a o al ~ ~ O d > ~ d a d Y O N O n h N T a 0 d 0 f d q LL' 0 N O N d 1+1 ~ y O m O N N N ~ N n m m O j d C1 N V C d ~ q ~ N ~ M ° I. r n O /1 ~/ C Y q N N (p (D Q ~ N 0 ~ d C L ~ d ~ r 'O y V N R W O ~ ~ m ° M o N ~ M a r CR ~ ~ C G D a N N O 0 R U ~ a° Z a t o o t V a C au E q o O ~ Q > YO m Q m Y 5 n Z ~ n N LL Q U LL U M « dJ ~ Y Z Q c d N c d m Z O m d a j c Z ~ ~ N Q 9 C W L tt ~ b U m E ~ o ~ 9 ~ n G C _ b ~ < v O a c m m d N o C ;~ a a c ~ U N y 0 rc rn a V W m rv N O! N n n a N N N CO W O O O O n~ Ea °0 o 0 0 qrJ' a3 ~ 0 n 0 n ` O r +'~ C r N q ~ q. N N 0 0 0 0 d O M t y q °o o °o 0 Q N ~ 0 0 > .. c a d ~ i a £ a o d p> >. Z ~ ~ L ~ m m ~ c ~ ~ ' ° o W ~ C L Y ~ o q p ~ ~ Q r O ~ 7 O N o a ~ sW ~ o t V ~ d y O Z 0 z N _ Z ~ ~ E ~ V1 ~' U w Q J U o ~ y m ~ L ~ ~ J ~_ Q .O c C q E ~i ~ -` ~ E N N C U C a N a ~ e ~ o y U J tq O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 °o °o °o °o 0 0 0 0 O d Y N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 e ° °O ° °o ° °o °o 0 0 0 0 °o °o °o °o O O N N O P N O ossoos N N N N N N V m fD N n N ~ ~ N ee°°°° f ` ' N h N a a tt ¢ 0 0 U U Y Y U' C7 Z Z Y Y ~ ~ m m z z o 0 ~ ~ m m ~ ~ 0 o z z z z W W Q Q Q Q K K 0 0 0 0 U U J J J J ~ ~ w w w w ¢ ¢ E ~ ~ ~ Q ¢ O o_ o_ O y LL LL p QQ QQ QJQ QJQ QJQ QJ¢ K K K K K K y W W W W w w 0 0 0 ~ 0 ~ W W W W W W LL LL LL LL LL LL Q 0 U M N N N N N N ~ N ~ N ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ .- .- C d Q OJ N y ' p Of U w ~ Z Y a b N N q ~ ~ n n U' C7 '~ ~ ~~~~X q LL m of n m in n ' = 1 I I 9 N N N 0 f O a N C 0 O U N e d R H 'NO O m n C ; „ I ~ , ~ e O 3 0 LL _ J Z` U E o Y ~ Z O Vl m a a ~ t Z N O C 2 ~y_ _ . L J O N y 'o q U N_ N W O c e '> m y ti P7 o¢~ ° ~ m ai o LL O ~ 0 d a ¢ E a 0 P N 0 rc P8 d O J Uj so v~ r M ~ O N fH 9~ 0 0 0 m l O O O r O O O r N M Ol i ~ o N M n ~ ~ o a o O O O O O O W 1~ N I~ m N ~ 0 N M r ~ ~ o a O O O O a0 ° n o u i ~ N e N f0 r O) !~ It! r m M «~ A a td O) D7 N m m M N N O r ~ N fA fA fA q e e e N r r O O O O O O q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q J Q Q Q ry p Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z f _ _ m A C O O O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ L l N N N N N N N N N N ~ m ~ p 7 M M N N N _ _ ~ M J ( M M ~ M d ~ T~ m N M N N !~ W~ C d Q u c . m N M a ._ _ ~+ LL O t7 0 $ _ o 33 a c , O E d Ul Vl N N N N N Vl N L m c m ~ N N a a a a a a a s a a a ~ m> C m c c c c c c c c c c c FF J J J J J J J J J J J v a Z j LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL O: N 9d C N N N 0 N N O N N N W m > 9 ~ ~ ~ '~ ~ ~ ~ Y O C C m d m m m m m (0 d d d C C W ~ ~ ~ ~ L ~ G ~ ~ ~ rG O C L T T T T T T T T T T T E m c d d d d d d d d d d d 10L o c c c 00 0 c c c 000 c c 00 c c c 000 ~ A ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ U U m t C LL m SE E _ N J > > c a c c c a c a a d a LL J LL J J J J LL>> ~ J d Y LL LL LL d LL LL Q d« LL p m Z N m m in Z m u+ d d d d m ~ ~ ~ O'C = d 6 O. d0. ma ~ ~y N ~ ~~nE `o ~ 9 d 01 O1 O1 m N Q N N N 10 LL LL LL LL m m C _N _N N N m 2 '^ 3 3 3 3 Fa m N m a c a c a c o O O m m m W O~ Ol K c c C m d F a C a C a C O N d J J J d a N d d m ~ ~ K C C a' O O O O - - - m N U U U O1 O O O C N _ Q Q Q J O {Kp N N S H F H O e y V O O O i d O Z P9 a q ~ U' q ~~ r ~n O N 9~ 0 0 0 °-'I o 0 0 > o00 m r N (M O) i i r O N M r ~ ~ o a o O O O 000 m N h O) N ~ O (V M r ~ ~ o a O O 00 n o mo N u i a N (O r D7 r N M O M b ` T OI D) N CJ M m m n N (V O r r N f9 (A fH N e e e N 000 000 ~ ^ _ .a. ~ Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q q q p 2 Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z f M O H O O H O O~ O> 0 0 ~ a O O O O O O O O O O ~ L N N N N N N N N N N N I q p M N N M M N _ ' ~ ~ ~ M M C l YJ d ~OJ~ ~NC7 ~N rm~ C a Q u ~ c . m a N Q q ~. ll O $~ E 3 a c °, O~ E m y q y N VI I/ N N q N N a c a E v-ov aav as ~vn > a> r a c c c c c c c c c c c m ° ~ > > > > > > > > > > > 2 9 > LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL j m C Y Y Y q 9 '~ '~ ~ '~ ~ '~ C a a a a a a a s a a a C V W ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ G rG ~ ~ Gr rC ° C ~ T T T T T T T T T T T E m a a a a a m a s a a a c q c c c c c c c c c c c L 0 0 0 0 O O O 0 0 0 0 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ U U m t ~ Z` O a C q LL ~ E Z E ~ N c > cv c °cav c v'° c caa c ° > ~ LL i c c ~" i i c LL c c L LL i I l l LL I l Q ii nin ' Z w m m w ' Z m w u a a a a 6 v a a o a o c 4% v« a n °~ d a °~ = ma _ ~=m ~~ o: fn= ° c v m o m 0 m 0 m 0 m a Q 1 LL L L I l I C q N a N a ~ q ~ 3 3 3 Fa N Vl N a v a c c c 0 0 0 m m m m m m x c c c m a o o v a a 2 ° ` a a ~ m m LL , a , a < c c c c ° o 0 0 m ~n m o a o y a a a o m m m x r- ~ ~ r rn v 0 o m o d 0 z P10 m 0 U U V 0 _T U YI C M0 ~ W d O ~ ~ r ~ ~ ~ r V ~ ~ O O C 7 Nf l6 fA ~ Q ~ O ~ ~'-°~ ~ Q Q a Z e°~ a a 0 E> ~'c W n ~ i Z 'a w 0 h 8 ° 0 o G ~m o m ° o p$D T w W q 0 ~i~ o a° J[ N m d 01 f ~ 0 o ~ 0 0 G 0 C ~ N N N N N N N m tD W N N N m N N N m 0 m n m m m < °° c D ~ of o o ~ °r F ~ `m ~ U LL m ~ 6 of yj OI N 01 p~ m N C N O ~ H d 9 C O A O ~ ~ N W ~ m b m t ~ ~ m_ O en E 0 Z Q - --- ~ z 'a~Z<U-j~~ `.` t C Cd y c N K °a a N d d ° c C U ~ C ry A ~ A w ,~ m o O T « A } O N W ~ OI d ~ U ~ U Q W v m a m .~. c :°. m E a a N V d _N Q C d w E r y L_ 3 aPi ~ rn c m ~ a ~ ow v a m ~ ~ ~ N ~ v w L 0 of O VI IA C a v c E m j C 0 O p ~E O ;V Qa ~ n ~ t o y o y N E U d ~ O T a ~~ ~~ ao °_ ~ L N ~ y U ~ C N d O U C O E m U H ~ d U O O L Q U C ~ 3 O y L L ~ " c O N c ~ E E N ~ C O -a` L_ C N ~ N ~ -_ ; i~ C T d L m F ~~ U O t0 O ~ N o Q d N u~ m HQ ary m < r . F _~ O a > o ~ ~ a m 0 a K a ~ a 0 N t'1 N O ~ O m 9 0 g. v C ? r m O o a d ~ a P11 ad u ~o ~ q a ~ «~ N ~ ~ N o~ f o o e 0 0 0 0 0 0 s. d I a a m~ 9~ N N D N O ~, m C r O ~ £ ~ l0 Q~ CN 0 L 1 (~'~ Q ~ y 4t a R c m E m r ~ 0 0 Na°~Z p a N q L ~ a' m a rn< q C R >Q Q a U =1` ~It A m n O N N 5 m Z K 0 LL J Q U LL ~ y Y m QZ ~, fG > Z Q ~ c Z 2 J O ~ v N v Q v A Q: a m m m C C m n E ~ c m d o o' °~ L7 H N N i0 O N N N 0 N pN Q N N W N O N m n d 01 m OI N Q a N H a~ Qa~ r _o E > a O LL~ O ~ K m G a ~ a ~ a 0 m C m 0 K a N N y d d q N N m b 10 b b b b r r O N 9 M C d m ~ a m ~ w y a o m ~F z O C T Of Q ~ m O `N .O ?, « r ^ ~ ~ ~ •`LLv O O O N N d r ~ a E m 0 z N N O O O C q O O O d ; O O O q O O O QL E D b b b dLr N N a3 a~ 0 NI N N L 6 YD ao ~s o d ~O d d f a ;; 3~ N i u °o 0 3 z O LL J Q U LL Y Q O m ~ Z N O Z J C O O U Q m m 4' ~ a m m C N d N E c m m o > o O < U' N M f P12 <¢~ F o i o i8 s o u ~ a ~ a 0 m 0 C' 0 K P13 N O E U 0 U `o T U N 0 ~+ m C d O ~ l6 ~~E$ ~ C 3 M Q ~ ~ d o a txo ~ p ~ ~ ~ ~ O aZ Na° Q N~~/ LL -_, S Z U~ ~D ___ U ~2 > Z 'a m ~2 > c w e r ~~ i.3 ~ ~ `o 0 e° a° O _~ m A 1 d m N 7 f O O O N r (~ N ~ .n m o b 0 0 G m W N a v m o ~ m 0 0 0 N N r r b N 0 M N r I ~ .n v e o " m ~ 0 r6 ei o ~ `° o O N N n O N N a 0 O O ~ N ~ Po ~ rn N O < m n r m `" r e O A N e of oyf tp n ep m °m °m <~ N r M a e 01 O N y~ m ^ °' ~ ~ m N O ~ r ~ N N ~ ~n o d ~ m Y ~ a U LL N ~j O O N N O) e M W d q o o n ~ C CJ N ~p ~ °o °o m a ~ ~ ~ r o M oa o m W ~ o V fo ~ L N V ~ ! N ^ V C ~ b V 1~1 d a ' o Z ~ LL U i M C d E d C c a N N ~ v y~ C N O O C rn m rn d a „ y v c d v > LL E ~ ~ E V ~ C y A ~ b m O m 2' ;: C d Q ~ N Y d j w ~ m . d A U ~ U Q W ~ a Q N O y Q ~ r ~ v F > 0 d ~ ~ °~ ¢ c ~ m o a a ~ C a ~ d m c m E d n 0 0 N U C N OI C Q d v E L N L ~ _ d 3 U ~ C 0 O C a O '~ U ~a m c y N ~ a ~ NL U O O ~ 6v y C d c E Gl O c n ~ E u o Q ~ x n N L e~ N N o o ` a a C J d 0 0 o~ > L ~ d d C N d 01 U C O ~ E w ~ a U 'g o ~ L d C C N ~ L d y~ L.. C O N r d C L °' E E m y OI N 1 0 0 ~a n m .. L C d E ~ N 0 N N ~ v= O T y ry L ~~ r 0 ~ _ O O O p t 6 P ~ ? O r an C o m ~ a ° F~ K rc ~d O O O O P W ~ JG N N N ~ N N N 1 r Q ~ m a ~ N N N N N f~ N N M lh 0 0 0 0 0 Z' ~ o o `d m m ~ d ~ ~~ , m . m m m m o~ m m o m rn O m m o m m C< m V P N W W W W N N I O I O I O a a a a a a S f o 0 0 0 0 n d 0 0 0 0 0 «d q h m m N m ~K H d O O O O O O ~ O O O O O O d O O O N O N ] 0 0 0 O O O m m 1~ m Y g O O O O O 0 m O o 0 0 0 Ol Y O N Y 1~ O O O O O O j W N n ~ p W r 1 O O N 0 O Ip ~ m ~ o y ~ O O O O O Y ~ f7 O O N P h C ~ }~ / W ~ T O ~ r ~~ G1 d ~ N ~ O O O O O O ~ ~ C ° ° ° ° ° ° V j o o o o o o O C ~ M o ° o ° ° ° a o o o o {a y o 0 0 0 0 0 c Q ~ Ih Y Y N Y M L ~ d O c G F O ~ ' ~ O 0 Z d~ ~- r ~- ~ ~ O O w q d O O O O O N /~ LO N N N N N LL Y N Q O ~ N N N N ~ a ° ° 0 0 0 0 d o 0 m u ° . n ~q n N Q m p O 0 Y Y ~ z z z z z a a m h m m m y N N z z a a a aac~ c~co 0 0 ~ W W J ~ ~ J J O O a a s rn ~ = Z z 2 @ d Q Q Q ~ K K Q ~ K a w w w w w a 0 0 0 ~ 0 C W W W W W d LL LL LL LL LL O a ° O m c 4 m ~ O U ~ ~ N m N ~ y Y Y Y O Y N T O C d Q m m m N N Y m m LL LL ~ U m m m ` m N ¢ 0 0 LL m r r LL U' C7 N V m m ~ ~ d U LL m n N ~ m 0 0 0 N N N O O O N O O O f N N M m n M m m m m tOp O O O a a a 0 0 0 o O o O O O N N N N O 0 N m r N h m m e o m m m N N ~ A tOD N tP+i O i 33I. O O O N N N N N N 0 0 0 n a a a `O a a a m ~ ~ ~ n ~ ~ N A O 33~ a a a N N fA W W W ~ o! o H f f a a a rn W W W d O O O `u U1 ~ h ~ LL LL LL p J J C d U U U 9 O a f%1 O O O C C O m a °o °o °o ~ m ~ ~ 'J O O O f ~~~ ~° ai ~~ z~ 0 ¢ ~ LL j m a J 9 J 3 d O a O ~ C N LL Y N ~ d O O li N N O d~ 3 ~', e~ N O d n . 01 O m A m Q n m O N N V! a d F `d a C d O F P14 m w a a O ~ ~ a LLI n o a rc a ~ a 0 C a_ m O rc P15 r ~ ? ! € i ~ - b b C q O ; ae Ea m O 3 ~ ~ O r r N b m ~ N ~ ~ M b b t° u ° p C ~ m '° p d a `o m ~ d a o m ~ ~ z ~ ~ m ~ a ~ ~Q o- b ~ p '~ r a A o ~ ~a _ 1.1 b ~ r Q ~ ~ O N N d ~ ~w Q ~ 9~ N Q ~ G d O Z `u b b u d C N U r E c ~ a N y L c 0 f a C LL C d 1 C T u c Q u J 0 X N c 0 a U a _N T C m m m d d LL o$ as °a$ R% d k N O O O 0 0 N M 0 E ° ° ~ c ~ LL a ~ fn ~ N 7. ~ N t J W C 3 0 f a c LL d y 1 N m s o d N a O m n U 0 i N °m a „ Q N n Q p u > o i8 a o u ~ a ~ a m 0 C' a m a K P16 m 0 ryE U U L u U N C /~/O~ W~ W d O ~ tC ~ ~ ~ ~ N v ea ~ c O ~ ~/7~ ~y w/ L Q ~ O d a m ~~c E O 0 ~ ~ 0 aZ r a° Q N~N I.f~ ____S O U z .°~ t U a> ~ o F j ~n m N O o O Cl W N M `~ > voNi ~ O ~ N O' C o p' W O r ~' m °m qy m m ~p O~ m ~ p F N I~ ~ 0 O n ~ O O ._ m p o rd of o N ~ O a° o ~ °o °o p 0 o q o o C m > °o 00 0 O O ~ 0 o O N O p N m N p m; N A f ~ A d aq 00 00 O O °o °o 0 0 N O N m 0 0 m m 0 0 0 0 0 0 N O N m Y ~ C O] ~' U a 8 H dN FC N C 0 O N m O 0 G N m• O c O C W ~ m m v °v ~ U LL ~ e ~ O N p m 'o °f O O ~ ~ O F ~ m N U LL e C t0 O N O C n O O W rn O L M O N_ C m M d a y 0 Z u ~ C y m ~ A m m O p~ T ~ ~ } d y W C Ol d R V ~ U Q W L r_ ~ y3 E U d c m ~ oO ~ U OI N C C C m ~ d C m o o y 2 j m °y m V d m m m N ~ r m O E N j m O ~ 4 f y D ~ O c o O m L c ., o v =. v `~ E 0 0 a _T X p F J d a 3 N Q C wr N m m~ c ~ m J V v' N m N o m 0 a-> ~ O ma n3 0 0 ~ L m m C ~ m m K d N t O• E C m O E o ~a` U c m u E C m m ~ ~ C L m « F O c r mOo EN m~ C y D .L+ y m d U ~ N ~a v T m -ya m w 6` N mo C 0 d T d U m o m H Q ~ a m Q n F O f ~ ~I t LL g o ? ~ a f a 0 N O 1~1 O N 0 a yO C ~ m C_ Y m 6 ~ m ~ ~ P17 a N y(/j pi W y C r O E y ~' ~ ~ > N C Q L 1 (~~ Q ~ N N K «~ ~ o m ~ m n~oo r°, a° ~ Z p a ~+d N L q O ~ O N q O f a ~.. ~ f C N N q r (7 Vl o~ ~~ 0 0 ~ N h O O _q T d D O O O d j0 h 6' o' N d O O 7 O O q O O O O Y O O g O O m N N N N b O O q O O 1 O O YN O O N N q N N °o °o, q O O ~ O O a °o °o N N N N q q O L 0 _N a o d b O ppl ~ O ` q O j q O Q m O N Z N D: Q LL Q U O d Y R b ¢ > m Q Z 9 ~_ C Z q O Y d C p A m N e d ~ W a Z n ~ ~ n N O 6 O O 0 N d N A ~ u ~ a w ~ N J d v U °m M O N p0 N T e e N N N N O O q Q O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N b !9 ?S O O 2 O f7 O Q b F Q Z O r m Q N Z J ~ ~ a W D ~ C W q LL O C ~ O N a 0 U m m m ~ J VI _N T c b m Q J W O d N V IL N b N O O O O N m O O O N O 0 0 O °o m O O O W m `m Q q O H m a Q ¢ r o f > a d' 0 LLI O O a K a s a 0 0 C a_ m O a ' ' I I ! . O N y O ~ M C ~ m C w d Q O t0 p~ F Z O C ~. W Ip m ~ Q ~ ~, O (a O •7 ~/ ~ ~ Q 0 O O N N Q, r ~ a E m 0 z N N O rt nW Ea d $ d3 rc~ 0 m~ n H w ~ n ,o ao O q U 0 N d q N Y C R N c m d CI O i Z C O a d O d u a !~ V U S H z E E o ~ a 0 ~ T y L C O ~_ N D C C d C T U C d m Q u J O 0 °o ci 0 0 a Ol C d O U tll N N u m Q m `w d LL P18 ~ a F p d > LL~ O K O 2 ~ a E a A 0 rc STAFF REPORT PUBLIC WORKS SERVICES DEP~IRTMENT Date: December 21, 2011 To: Mayor and Members of the City Council Chair and Members of the Redevelopment Agency John R. Gillison, City Manager From: William Wittkopf, Public Works Services Director By: Emest Ruiz, Streets, Storm Drains and Fleet Superintendent Michael Maston, Assistant Engineer jZANCHo CUCAMONGA Subject: ACCEPT THE "STORM DRAIN LIFT STATION MAINTENANCE PROJECT', CONTRACT NO. CO 11-047/RA 11-004, AS COMPLETE; RELEASE THE BONDS, ACCEPT A MAINTENANCE BOND; APPROVE THE RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE PUBLIC WORKS SERVICES DIRECTOR TO FILE A NOTICE OF COMPLETION, AND APPROVE THE FINAL CONTRACT AMOUNT OF $81,442.30. It is recommended that the City Council and Redevelopment Agency Board accept the Storm Drain Lift Station Maintenance Project Contract No. CO 11-047/RA 11-004, as complete, approve the resolution authorizing the Public Works Services Director to file a Notice of Completion, release the Faithful Performance Bond, accept a Maintenance Bond, authorize the release of the Labor and Materials Bond in the amount of $79,090 six months after the recordation of said notice 'rf no claims have been received and authorize the release of the retention in the amount of $8,144.23, thirty-five (35) days after acceptance. Also approve the final contract in the amount of $81,442.30. BACKGROUNDIANALYSIS The subject project has been completed in accordance with the approved plans and spec cations and to the satisfaction of the Public Works Services Director. The Storm Drain Lift Station Maintenance Project scope of work included the installation of new pumps at Archibald Avenue and south of Devon Street and at Etiwanda Avenue and south of Arrow Route. Pertinent information of the project is as follows: - Budgeted Amount: $65,000 - Account Numbers: 1122303-5650/17781220 (South Et"nvanda Drainage) 2660801-5607 (2004 Tax Allocation Bonds) - City Council's Approval to Advertise: January 19, 2011 - Publish dates for local paper: January 25 and February 1, 2011 P19 P20 PUBLIC WORKS SERVICES DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT Re: ACCEPT STORM DRAIN LIFT STATION MAINTENANCE PROJECT DECEMBER 21, 2011 Page 2 - Bid Opening: - Contract Award Date: - Low Bidder: - Contract Amount: - Contingency: - Final Contract Amount: - Increase in Contrail Amount: February 22, 2011 April 20, 2011 Scorpion Backhoe $79, 090 $ 7,910 $81,442.30 $ 2,352.30 (3°~) The contract amount increased by $2,352.30 due to two contract change orders. Change Order No. 1 contained the modification of the steel screen mesh to a stainless steel screen mesh. This change will provide for a longer lasting and durable debris screen mesh. Change Order No. 2 contained the new circuit breaker and the stainless steel shackles. The existing electrical panel did not have the required circuit breaker space, so a new circuit breaker was installed. The stainless steel shackles were needed to connect the lifting cables to the eyepiece on the pumps. Resp ully bmitt , William Wittkopf Public Works Services Director VV1N: ER/mm Attachment P21 RESOLUTION NO. RA 11-020 A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR THE STORM DRAIN LIFT STATION MAINTENANCE PROJECT AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for the Storm Drain Lift Station Maintenance Project have been completed to the satisfaction of the Public Works Services Director; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work is complete. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council and Redevelopment Agency Board of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves that the work is hereby accepted and the Public Works Services Director is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Register 11/30/2011 through 12/13/2011 Check No. Check Dale Vendor Name Amount AP 00317467 2011/11/301 AFSS 75.00 AP 003]7481 2011/11/301 BARTELASSOCIATESLLC 1,225.00 AP 00317486 2011/11/301 BURTON'S FIRE INC 602.41 AP 00317500 2011/11/30 l CARQUEST AUTO PARTS 56.33 AP 00317503 2011/11/30( CFPI 300.00 AP 00317506 2011/11/30 ( CHINO MOWER AND ENGINE SERVICE 82.75 AP 00317519 2011/11/30 ( DEPARTMENT OF FORESTRY AND FIRE PROTEC 648.00 Ap 00317519 2011/11/30 t DEPARTMENT OF FORESTRY AND FIRE PROTEC 648.00 AP 00317531 2011/11/301 FRANKLIN TRUCK PARTS 58.86 AP 00317533 2011/11/30 ( GENTRY BROS INC 38,800.00 AP 00317533 2011/11/301 GENTRY BROS INC -3,880.00 AP 00317543 2011/11/301 HOYT LUMBER CO., SM 33.93 AP 00317543 2011/11/301 HOYT LUMBER CO., SM 46.32 AP 00317543 2011/11/301 HOYT LUMBER CO., SM 67.87 AP 00317548 2011/11/301 INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 144.74 AP 00317548 2011/11/301 INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 168.68 qP 00317548 2011/11/301 INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 512.48 AP 00317548 20] 1/11/301 INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 103.45 Ap 00317548 2011/11/301 INDEPENDENT STATIONERS -24.63 AP 00317548 2011/11/301 INDEPENDENT STATIONERS -45.15 AP 00317548 2011/11/301 INDEPENDENT STATIONERS -17.14 Ap 00317556 2011/11/30 1 KME FIRE APPARATUS 183.98 AP 00317556 2011/11/30 I KME FIRE APPARATUS 217.98 AP 00317556 2011/11/30 I KME FIRE APPARATUS 177.10 Ap 00317557 2011/11/301 LARKIN, DAVID W 346.40 AP 00317561 2011/11/301 LIGHTHOUSE, THE 21.66 Ap 00317582 2011/11/301 OWEN ELECTRIC INC 381.86 AP 00317607 2011/11/301 SC FUELS 6,648.36 AP 00317607 2011/11/30 ( SC FUELS 3,424.91 AP 00317607 2011/11/30 f SC FUELS 914.49 AP 00317607 2011/11/30 t SC FUELS 2,377.70 AP 00317607 2011/11/30 t SC FUELS 1,224.88 AP 00317617 2011/11/30 ( SIGNCRAFTERS OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 840.45 AP 00317619 2011/11/30 ( SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 189.13 AP 00317619 2011/11/30 ( SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 189.12 AP 00317619 2011/11/30 ( SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 105.11 AP 003176]9 2011/11/30 ( SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 23.63 AP 00317624 2011/11/301 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 267.48 AP 00317624 2011/11/301 SOUTHERN CALIFORMA EDISON 1,246.16 AP 00317624 201 Vl l/301 SOUTI-IERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 1,246.17 AP 00317626 2011/11/30 ( SOUTHERN COUNTIES LUBRICANTS LLC 4,850.00 AP 00317626 2011/11/30 ( SOUTHERN COUNTIES LUBRICANTS LLC 725.94 AP 00317635 2011/11/30 ( TURNOUT MAINTENANCE COMPANY LLC 323.25 AP 00317635 2011/11/30 ( TURNOUT MAIN"I"ENANCE COMPANY LLC 496.00 AP 00317635 2011/11/301 TURNOUT MAINTENANCE COMPANY LLC 698.00 P22 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 1 Curren[ Date: 12/15/: Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 07:5 RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT P23 Agenda Check Register 11/30/2011 through 12/13/2011 Check No. Check Dale Vendor Name Amoum AP 00317644 201 Ul 1/30 ( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 38.26 AP 00317644 2011/11/30 ( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 57.48 AP 00317644 2011/11/30 ( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 43.36 AP 00317644 2011/11/30 ( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 37.09 AP 00317644 2011/11/30( VERIZONCALIFORNIA ]77.71 AP 00317644 2011/1 l/301 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 175.80 AP 00317644 2011/11/301 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 550.02 AP 00317652 2011/11/30 ( WINZER CORPORATION 57.87 AP 00317658 2011/12/01 1 EMCOR SERVICE 685.57 AP 00317713 2011/12/07 ( ALL CITIES TOOLS 96.97 AP 00317713 2011/12/07 ( ALL CITIES TOOLS 60.34 AP 00317733 2011/12/071 EIGHTH AVENUE ENTERPRISE LLC 68.96 AP 00317747 2011/12/071 HOYTLUMBERCO.,SM 9.16 AP 00317762 2011/12/071 LIEBERTCASSIDYWHITMORE 2,816.65 AP 00317765 2011/12/071 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 2,793.13 AP 003]7765 2011/12/071 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 765.39 AP 00317781 2011/12/07 l NATIONAL CONSTRUCTION RENTALS INC 169.20 AP 00317805 2011/12/07 ( CALIFORNIA OES, STATE OF 310.00 AP 00317828 2011/12/08 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 55.20 AP 00317835 2011/12/08 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 1,362.25 AP 00317835 2011/12/081 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ED[SON 627.37 AP 00317835 2011/12/081 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 1,356.96 AP 00317835 2011/12/08 1 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 746.64 AP 00317837 2011/12/081 VERIZON CALIFORNIA ~ 475.70 AP 00317837 2011/12/08 1 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 475.70 AP 00317837 2011/12/08 ( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 475.70 AP 00317837 2011/12/08 l VERIZON CALIFORNIA 475.70 AP 00317837 2011/12/08 ( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 19.56 AP 00317837 2011/12/08 ( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 19.56 AP 00317837 2011/12/08 ( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 37.09 AP 00317837 2011/12/08 l VERIZON CALIFORNIA 37.09 AP 00317843 2011/12/08 ( GENERATOR SERVICES CO 1,650.00 AP 00317851 2011/12/08 ( LN CURTIS AND SONS 402.30 Total for Entity: 83,856.44 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 2 Curren[ Date: 12/15/: Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layou[ Time: 07:5 OI ~> O y N n O h C 7 0 0 0 ~ N O O 'C N O ~ j Q p 0 m ~ U 0 t c '° '° y n m K f i ~ ~ p r°ii o o ~ e o ~ r' o m 1 0 C O O _T ~ U y > Ot N 10 t0 A " O~ F CC ~~ ^ N ~ N F O N O7 OJ e 0 O - 0 N N < ~ m p O ~~ N n n O a° ~ j Q O In m t~ N N N ~~ O q m> O O O N ~ m A A O O N N O' O V O o 0 r ~L V Y p O CN O O (~ t7 N N C y ~ N 0) m N ' d n ~ ~ ~ ~ £ O N 01 ~ +~' lE p V C 7 M d t0 M ~ W~ A O O LL ~ d d 'J O O Q O O O O a y O I~ N N N IO b ~ N M N O I~ A N h I1, ~/ ~ > O N ~ O O O I N ~ O ~ O ~ N N LL a Z Y O N N N y (7 ° O ~ vi O I N ~j a e r ~ d o 0 o O ~n S~ v o f o 0 c y n d > o ~ °o °o ~ a n o d d d ° n < O N O O th r ~n O~ N co r C d O g ~ O t O O d I4 U LL U = > j N c d ~ a ~ E ~ y a ~ C _ i~ ~ ~ ~~ 9 > ~ ~ ~' y Ys U a aL YTd t ~ d C ~ ~ N m m C ~ T{ ~ p d rn c ~a m N ~ ' y o _Q ~ L ac ~ c S ~ ~ ~ U n~ ¢ in ~ P24 Q r 1~ LL _ L y O ~ ~ _ ~~~ _ o ~ ai S rc d o o m ¢ m m ~ a ~ ~ O a ~ a a y t L T U « N U ~ O o'°" ayo ' C F ~' d N E ~ y jp N d ~ > «_ O Sa d d C v O J `O N N Ta T 6~L O C C N C O d d y v N L y C C (O O E d d a x O y ~ U Ova .a c c N O ~ U O .. w d ° a i a u E c 0 o d n T E c o y e w'> > ° n Eon o ~ ° N j 3 y O) ao 1~ m c~~ M O y ,L n y O ~ p U N L 3 ~N da T'U c _C ~ ~ T C O y yU o^'w ~aL ~ o' w no c c o ` a m y y a C C > d O e ~ O f~1 pp ~! L y ao N m ° m ~ E c N Cf - N N .n m tD a m E N O N oar a- w c ^, U N LL ~~5 >~ -~~ -~ 0 N ~ Q N C N C C M T d d ~ r ~' N N ~ y y ~ n ~ p E U Q C ~ ~ U O A C yp~ ~ J ~ ~ ? C U ~ ~ N r m m `o ` H W d ~ c a ~ F 7. •• d O ° H 6 e ~ ;~~a c m ~ c E ~ ~ Y w ~ i L _ ~Eo v s ~ o. ~ U Q W _QU v -O. ~ s' d N a V W }~ y C d ~ ~ D C d d ~ N O ~ Y ~ c ~ ~ V C d t0 ~ P'1 y n o~ ~ •- a m a o E ~ ~ o c • Z va° ~ N~ to u a a° a' dd A C N >m Q ED o~ pyl o ~ ° ~ ~ i i l - l i + °v, O V O a a~ o Y q P O y ~ °v °a N Y O O C o 0 e O o m e e y O O ~ < V q th i! O O y O pO y Y Q N N b a C N E w c a N J U to I" O o Z ~ 7 ~ LL m Z W y W Z_ Y U y Z m W Q Q ¢ a U m J q O c a y C J LL C o ° E N C T c m Q O 0 J m 0 0 °o °O 0 °o N s o N N ~ N 0 0 m S O N o m y O O O F N ' N Z 2 ~ U Q ~ ~ Z F ~ W F d ~ a A Z F N Q K Q y Q W LL C J C W ~ Q m W ~ U ~ a O a" c > > O N y 6 0 V m o N o ~ v N ~ N T 'O u c c O ~ m Q N q Y ~ ~• J R ~ u m d ^ ~ ~ ~°., LL n L m m O T N O° m b Q N T d O m M m r r m Q ac qN V F P25 w a Q N LL O f > ai o r ~ o u a ~ a P_ m °i e 9 O K N OI a $ 2' A r G~ ~ o N O b T d a 0 0 E 0 a w N 9~ y m ~n ~ r q I~ ~ o o ~_ m N d ~ 7 n q n Q N 1~ ~ ~ ~~ " o t H m ~ C d V N ~ r O ~ N r t0 -_ O a ~V~1~~ C M '° ~y C~ ~ V d CJ 0 C Q a ~ c ~ d o o > 0 LL O O Z p q V d d ~c 5 N 6 ~L d b b1 d q C 7 q am z O LL Q U LL `u Y N m Z Q 2 c b E ~ 0 c u Q °o OI Y U d L O N a° N N h U d y 0 N n a N O N r C °w 3 0 a Q VI O O O U q m m b Q m m n n W O n N O 0 N N n N NI 1'1 S N r r Ol W Vl E N 7 C a G q L N q U 0 P26 way ~ Q LL O f - a o i C a d u f a m i" 0 d Ol a N Y C j~ O ; 6 ~ Ez ur ~3 r O N w u~ m u + M ~ a r ~ ~ y pC a~ ~ .. y a E ~ ~' O 01 ~` Z ::. V A C ~ T L p1 d lE m 7 0 ~ ~`, ~ p`s a o _ ~ •; t .. ~o q d ~ o u Q ~ o q LL ~ N O ~ a ~ dR N 4L ~ yC ~ E d 0 Z N P27 w a w Q N n LL O f j o ai 8 ~ z o a ~ a n p Q O O N A wi o o o ° ~ v m o v i 0 0 o 0 a 0 a 0 O O N W r N IO O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 rn o 0 m 0 0 m °o °0 0 o e 0 0 of N 0 ei N f0 ri N f0 Y Q O o Q O °O N O LL z 5 W ~ Z O N W LL J Z Q U ~. ~p Y U Z` LL O ~ w s ~ s o o s ~ Q a E m a a a N ~ ~! y Z H N N O T = C ~ L Z ~ O _ c ~ O g c ~ c n ~ LL c ~ 0 O N U F °o Q °o ry w y ~ C O N > c Y u b T N V m U L C O o c U ~ m v a o N a $ a A ~ o N o d O O Y A > d ~ O J to d fA W f P28 Pooled State of California Money Investment Account Market Valuation 10/31 /2011 Description Carrying Cost Plus Accrued Interest Purch. Fair Value .Accrued Interest United States Treasu Bills $ 21,802,311,930.60 $ 21,844,637,500.00 NA Notes $ 12,845,889,199.79 $ 12,922,285,500.00 $ 15,550,242.50 Federal A enc SBA $ 541,938,967.72 $ 542,581,753.90 $ 571,963.60 MBS-REMICs $ 418,332,756.32 $ 454,879,521.35 $ 1,987,893.25 Debentures $ 875,740,732.39 $ 876,298,250.00 $ 1,753,687.50 Debentures FR $ - $ - $ - Discount Notes $ 3,892,816,666.60 $ 3,897,717,000.00 NA GNMA $ 33,885.08 $ 34,601.41 $ 333.52 IBRD Deb FR $ 300,000,000.00 $ 300,459,000.00 $ 42,704.00 CDs and YCDs FR $ 600,000,000.00 $ 600,000,000.00 $ 525,670.66 Bank Notes $ - $ - $ - CDs and YCDs $ 6,160,014,763.15 $ 6,156,076,692.54 $ 2,665,394.46 Commercial Pa er $ 4,023,311,749.83 $ 4,024,136,944.44 NA Co orate: Bonds FR $ - $ - $ - Bonds $ - $ - $ - Re urchase A 'reements $ - $ - $ - Reverse Re urchase $ - $ - $ - Time De osits $ 4,188,140,000.00 $ 4,188,140,000.00 NA AB 55 & GF Loans $ 12,210,868,533.16 $ 12,210,868,533.16 NA TOTAL $ 67,859,399,184.64 $ 68,018,115,296.80 $ 23,097,889.49 Fair Value Including Accrued Interest $ 68,041,213,186.29 Repurchase Agreements, Time Deposits, AB 55 & General Fund loans, and Reverse Repurchase agreements are carried at portfolio book value (carrying cost). CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Aeenda Check Register 11/30/2011 through 12/]3/2011 P29 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP 00317461 2011/11/301 Al AUTOMOTNE ~ 479.97 AP 00317461 2011/11/301 Al AUTOMOTNE 86.95 AP 00317462 2011/11/301 AA EQUIPMENT RENTALS CO INC 62.65 AP 00317463 2011/11/30 ( ABLETRONICS 23.64 AP 00317464 2011/11/30 ( ABM JANITORIAL SW 43,055.11 AP 00317465 2011/11/30 ( ACEVES, YVETTE 250.00 AP 00317466 2011/11/30( AFLAC 7,396.63 AP 00317466 201]/11/30( AFLAC 7,805.80 AP 00317468 2011/11/30 ( AGAPE EMPLOYMENT 682.00 AP 00317468 2011/11/30 ( AGAPE EMPLOYMENT 370.91 AP 00317468 2011/11/30 ( AGAPE EMPLOYMENT 673.48 AP 00317468 201 Vl l/301 AGAPE EMPLOYMENT 682.00 AP 00317468 2011/11/30 ( AGAPE EMPLOYMENT 12.79 AP 00317469 2011/11/30 ( ALLEGIANT BUSINESS FINANCE 643.68 AP 00317469 2011/11/30 ( ALLEGIANT BUSINESS FINANCE 1,080.00 AP 00317470 2011/11/30 ( ALLIANCE RESOURCE CONSULTING LLC 9,333.00 AP 00317471 2011/11/30 ( ALTA LOMA PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOCIATES 5,550.00 AP 00317471 2011/11/30 ( ALTA LOMA PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOCIATES 5,550.00 AP 00317472 2011/11/30 ( ALVAREZ, ROSEMARY 7.00 Ap 00317473 2011/11/30 ( ANZ APPAREL 137.48 AP 00317474 2011/11/30 ( APPLIED METERING TECHNOLOGIES INC 9,957.05 AP 00317475 2011/11/301 ARCHULETA, MICHAEL 200.00 Ap 00317476 2011/11/301 ARENCIBIA, KATHY 250.00 AP 00317477 2011/11/301 ARNOLD FIELDS PAINTING 100.00 AP 00317478 2011/11/301 ASCE CONTINUING EDUCATION/MEMBERSHIP 255.00 AP 00317479 2011/11/30 ( AUTO AND RV SPECIALISTS INC. 77.99 Ap 00317480 2011/11/30 ( BAKER, CLIFF 70.00 AP 00317482 2011/11/30 ( BELLE'S PRINTING EXPRESS INC. 91.59 AP 00317483 2011/11/30 ( BERTINO AUTOMOTNE SERVICE 1,029.87 AP 00317484 2011/11/30 ( BIERMAN, V. MICHELLE 500.00 Ap 00317485 2011/11/30 ( BISHOP COMPANY 1,180.83 AP 00317487 2011/11/30 ( BUTLER SCHEIN ANIMAL HEALTH SUPPLY 1,656.70 AP 00317488 2011/11/30 ( CAL PERS LONG TERM CARE 691.60 AP 00317488 201 I/11/30 ( CAL PERS LONG TERM CARE 691.60 AP 00317459 201 ]/11/30 ( CALIFORNIA BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, STATE 3,683.00 AP 00317490 201 I/11/30 ( CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE BOARD 127.84 AP 00317491 2011/11/30 ( CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE TAX BOARD 50.00 AP 00317492 2011/11/30 ( CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE TAX BOARD 100.00 Ap 00317493 2011/11/30 ( CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE TAX BOARD 72.50 AP 00317494 2011/11/301 CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE TAX BOARD 50.00 AP 00317495 2011/1 U301 CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE TAX BOARD 150.00 AP 00317496 2011/11/30 l CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE TAX BOARD 111.93 AP 00317497 2011/11/30 l CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE TAX BOARD 100.00 AP 00317498 20)1/11/301 CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE TAX BOARD 294.29 AP 00317499 2011/ll/301 CAPITOL BUILDERS HARDWARE INC. 184.88 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 1 Current Date: 12/15/: Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 07:5 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P30 A>?enda Check Register 11/30/2011 through 12/13/2011 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP 00317501 2011/11/301 CASTELLANOS, ELIF 25.00 AP 00317502 2011/11/301 CASTILLO, FRANK 387.90 Ap 00317504 2011/11/30 ( CHAMPION AWARDS AND SPECIALTIES 45.26 AP 00317505 2011/11/30 ( CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT DNISION 175.00 AP 00317507 2011/11/30 t CONCEPT POWDER COATING 350.00 AP 00317507 2011/11/30 ( CONCEPT POWDER COATING 425.00 AP 00317508 2011/11/30 t CONTINENTAL AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPA' 79.40 AP 00317508 2011/1 I/301 CONTINENTAL AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPA' 16.39 AP 00317509 2011/11/30 l COSCO FIRE PROTECTION 540.00 AP 00317510 2011/11/301 CROP PRODUCTION SERVICES [NC 3,098.03 AP 00317510 20] 1/11/301 CROP PRODUCTION SERVICES INC 1,592.55 AP 00317510 2011/11/301 CROP PRODUCTION SERVICES INC 440.37 AP 00317510 2011/11/301 CROP PRODUCTION SERVICES INC 495.42 AP .00317511 2011/11/30 l CSI COMPANY, THE 750.00 AP 00317512 2011/11/301 CURRY, KAREN 1,350.00 AP 00317513 2011/11/301 D & D SERVICES INC. 400.00 AP 00317514 2011/11/301 D AND K CONCRETE COMPANY 416.46 AP 00317514 2011/11/301 D AND K CONCRETE COMPANY 770.42 AP 00317515 2011/l l/301 DAVID TAUSSIG AND ASSOCIATES INC. 300.00 AP 00317516 2011/11/301 DAWSON SURVEYING INC. 3,520.00 AP 00317517 2011/11/301 DEALER ALTERNATIVE SOLUTIONS 267.00 AP 00317518 2011/11/30 ( DENTAL HEALTH SERVICES 44.40 AP 00317520 2011/11/301 DGH CONSTRUCTION 500.00 AP 00317521 2011/11/30 ( DUNN EDWARDS CORPORATION 447.73 AP 00317522 2011/11/30 ( EMPIRE MOBILE HOME SERVICE 6,720.59 AP 00317523 2011/11/30 ( ENGLYNG, SHANNON 58.00 AP 00317524 2011/11/30 ( EXPRESS BRAKE SUPPLY 262.33 AP 00317524 2011/11/301 EXPRESS BRAKE SUPPLY 56.97 AP 00317524 2011/11/301 EXPRESS BRAKE SUPPLY 56.97 AP 00317525 2011/11/301 FASTENAL COMPANY -309.60 AP 00317525 2011/11/301 FASTENAL COMPANY 309.60 AP 00317525 2011/11/301 FASTENAL COMPANY 132.05 AP 00317527 2011/11/30 ( FENCE CRAFT OF UPLAND INC 1,032.58 AP 00317528 2011/11/30 ( FOOTHILL FAMILY SHELTER 340.00 AP 00317529 2011/11/301 FORD OF UPLAND INC 65.00 AP 00317530 2011/11/301 FOREMOST SILKSCREEN AND EMBROIDERY 503.41 AP 00317532 2011/11/301 FRAZEE PAINT CENTER 269.32 AP 00317533 2011/11/301 GENTRY BROS INC 150,000.00 AP 00317533 2011/11/30 ( GENTRY BROS INC 251,378.60 AP 00317533 2011/11/30 ( GENTRY BROS INC -25,137.86 AP 00317533 2011/11/30 ( GENTRY BROS INC -15,000.00 AP 00317534 2011/11/30 ( GRAINGER 4311 AP 00317534 2011/11/30 ( GRAINGER 362.08 AP 00317534 2011/11/30 ( GRAINGER -139.94 AP ~ 00317534 2011/11/30 ( GRAINGER 230.22 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 2 Curren[ Dale: 12/15/: Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 07:5 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 11/30/2011 through 12/13/2011 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name ~ Amoum AP 00317534 2011/11/30 ( GRAINGER 32.33 AP 00317534 2011/11/30 ( GRAINGER 40.41 AP 00317534 2011/11/30 ( GRAINGER 192.25 Ap 00317534 2011/11/30 ( GRAINGER 6.78 AP 00317534 2011/11/30 ( GRAINGER 34.91 AP 00317534 2011/11/30 ( GRAINGER 26.15 AP 00317534 - 2011/11/301 GRAINGER 161.06 AP 00317534 2011/11/301 GRAINGER 15.13 AP 00317535 2011/11/30 I HARBOUR, CAROL 964.00 AP 00317536 2011/11/301 HARGRAVES,ROMA 25.00 AP 00317537 2011/11/301 HARRIGANS ~ 178.86 AP 00317538 2011/11/301 HATANAKA, MARGARET 84.36 AP 00317538 2011/11/301 HATANAKA, MARGARET 18.00 AP 00317540 2011/11/301 HILLS PET NUTRITION SALES INC 491.46 AP 00317541 2011/11/30 ( HODGES, RANDY 250.00 AP 00317542 2011/11/30 [ HOSE MAN INC 221.88 AP 00317544 2011/11/30 ( HUR FLOORING INC ~ 30,309.44 AP 00317544 2011/11/30 ( HUR FLOORING INC -3,682.60 AP 00317545 .2011/11/30 ( HYDRO TEK SYSTEMS INC 1,238.05 AP 00317546 201 I/1 I/30 ( IAAP 25.00 AP 00317546 2011/11/30 ( IAAP 25.00 AP 00317546 2011/11/30 ( IAAP 25.00 Ap 00317546 2011/11/30( IAAP 25.00 AP 00317546 2011/11/30 ( IAAP 25.00 AP 00317546 2011/11/30( IAAP 25.00 AP 00317547 2011/11/301 IMPETT, VICTORIA ANN 250.00 AP 00317548 2011/11/30 1 INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 49.16 AP 00317548 2011/11/301 INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 130.58 AP 00317548 2011/11/301 INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 144.35 AP 00317548 2011/11/301 INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 101.14 AP 00317548 2011/11/301 INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 362.73 AP 00317548 2011/11/301 INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 3.07 AP 00317548 2011/11/301 INDEPENDENT STATIONERS -68.47 AP 00317548 2011/11/30 ( INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 21.81 AP 00317549 2011/11/30 ( INLAND EMPIRE TOURS AND TRANSPORTATIOi 2,101.25 AP 00317549 2011/11/30 l INLAND EMPIRE TOURS AND TRANSPORTATIOt 2,350.00 AP 00317550 2011/11/30 1 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 243.00 AP 00317551 2011/11/30 ( INLAND VALLEY EMERGENCY PET CLINIC 52.50 AP 00317551 2011/11/30 ( INLAND VALLEY EMERGENCY PET CLIDIIC 151.50 AP 00317551 2011/11/30 ( INLAND VALLEY EMERGENCY PET CLINIC 52.50 Ap 00317552 2011/11/30 ( INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE 75.00 AP 00317553 2011/11/30 ( IOSUE, KIM 500.00 AP 00317554 2011/11/301 JOHN DEERE LANDSCAPES 37.74 AP 00317555 2011/11/301 KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN INC 148,162.67 AP 00317555 2011/11/30 1 KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN INC 2,524.10 P31 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 3 Current Date: 12/1 SG Repor[: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 07:5 C[TY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register ]1/30/2011 through 12/13/2011 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP 00317559 2011/11/301 LEBERE, CHRIS 130 .00 AP 00317560 2011/11/301 LEWIS INVESTMENT COMPANY LLC 47,341 .78 AP 00317562 2011/11/30 ( MACADEE ELECTRICAL CONST. INC 49,830 .00 AP 00317562 2011/11/30 l MACADEE ELECTRICAL CONST. INC -4,983 .00 AP 00317563 2011/11/30 ( MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 4,993 .06 AP 00317564 2011/11/30 f MASTERCRAFT HOMES 32,696 .41 AP 00317565 2011/11/30 ( MATHESON TRI-GAS INC 1,192 .45 AP 00317566 2011/11/30 ( MC TRUCKING 1,200 .15 AP 00317567 2011/11/30 l MCMASTER CARR SUPPLY COMPANY 635 .22 AP 00317568 2011/1 t/30 ( MILANES, YIKCIA 525 .00 AP 00317569 2011/11/30 ( MITSUBISHI ELECTRIC & ELECTRONICS USA IN~ 579 .04 Ap 00317570 2011/11/30 ( MOUNTAIN VIEW SMALL ENG REPAIR 8 .15 AP 00317570 2011/11/30 ( MOUNTAIN VIEW SMALL ENG REPAIR 31 .78 AP 00317570 2011/11/301 MOUNTAIN VIEW SMALL ENG REPAIR 112 .97 AP 00317571 2011/11/30 ( MUNICIPAL MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT INC 821 .07 AP 00317572 2011/11/301 MUSIC THEATRE INTERNATIONAL 2,925 .00 Ap 00317572 2011/11/301 MUSIC THEATRE INTERNATIONAL 740 .00 AP 00317572 2011/11/30 ( MUSIC THEATRE INTERNATIONAL 400 .00 AP 00317572 2011/11/30 ( MUSIC THEATRE INTERNATIONAL 370 .00 AP 00317572 2011/11/30 ( MUSIC THEATRE INTERNATIONAL ~ 28 .67 AP 00317573 2011/11/30 ( MUSIC THEATRE INTERNATIONAL 5,580 .00 AP 00317573 2011/11/30 ( MUSIC THEATRE INTERNATIONAL 600 .00 AP 00317573 2011/11/30 ( MUSIC THEATRE INTERNATIONAL 400 .00 AP 00317573 2011/11/30 ( MUSIC THEATRE INTERNATIONAL 300 .00 AP 00317573 2011/11/30 ( MUSIC THEATRE INTERNATIONAL 23 .25 AP 00317574 2011/11/301 MWI VETERINARY SUPPLY 798 .63 AP 00317575 2011/11/30 ( NAPA AUTO PARTS 7 .62 AP 00317575 2011/11/30 ( NAPA AUTO PARTS 30 .15 AP 00317575 2011/11/30 ( NAPA AUTO PARTS 30 .15 AP 00317S7S 2011/11/30 l NAPA AUTO PARTS 16 .37 AP 00317575 2011/11/301 NAPA AUTO PARTS 119 .57 AP 00317576 2011/11/301 NEWTON, CRAIG 250 .00 AP 00317578 2011/11/30 ( OFFICE DEPOT 9 .09 AP 00317578 2011/] 1/30 ( OFFICE DEPOT 16 .12 AP 00317578 2011/11/30 ( OFFICE DEPOT ~ 154 .17 AP 00317578 201 ]/11/30 ( OFFICE DEPOT 34 .54 AP 00317579 2011/11/30 ( ONTARIO WINNELSON CO 45 .97 AP 00317580 2011/ll/301 OPARC 264 .00 Ap 00317581 2011/11/301 ORKIN PEST CONTROL 95 .00 AP 00317581 2011/11/30 ( ORKIN PEST CONTROL 1,475 .66 AP 00317581 201 I/11/30 ( ORKIN PEST CONTROL 75 .00 AP 00317582 2011/11/30 ( OWEN ELECTRIC INC 38 .60 AP 00317583 2011/11/30 ( PAL CAMPAIGN 50 .00 AP 00317584 2011/11/30( PIONEER MANUFACTURING 2,259 .50 Ap 00317585 2011/l l/301 PRE-PAID LEGAL SERVICES INC 161 .67 P32 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 4 Current Date: 12/1 S/: Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 07:5 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 11/30/2011 through 12/13/2011 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amoum AP 00317585 2011/11/301 PRE-PAID LEGAL SERVICES INC 11.40 AP 00317586 20] 1/11/301 PRECISION DENTAL MANAGEMENT 700.00 AP 00317587 2011/11/301 PRO FORCE LAW ENFORCEMENT 5,600.00 AP 00317588 2011/11/301 PRO SALES GROUP INC 161.60 AP 00317588 2011/11/30 l PRO SALES GROUP INC 791.35 AP 00317589 2011/11/30 l PRO SPRAY EQUIPMENT 4,989.60 AP 00317590 2011/11/30 ( PRO-PLANET INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY 380.38 AP 00317591 2011/11/30 ( RAINES, AMY M 150.00 Ap 00317591 201 Ul 1/30 ( RAINES, AMY M 350.00 AP 00317592 2011/11/30 ( RANCHO SMOG CENTER 35.00 AP 00317592 2011/11/30 t RANCHO SMOG CENTER 35.00 AP 00317593 2011/11/30 ( RBF CONSULTING 8,209.00 AP 00317593 2011/11/30 ( RBF CONSULTING 11,000.00 AP 00317594 2011/11/30( RCPFA - 9,107.54 Ap 00317596 2011/11/301 REPUBLIC ITS 4,610.00 AP 00317596 2011/11/301 REPUBLIC ITS 1,017.2] AP 00317596 2011/11/301 REPUBLIC ITS 3,530.00 AP 00317596 2011/11/30 ( REPUBLIC ITS 1,374.36 AP 00317596 2011/11/301 REPUBLIC ITS 3,328.34 Ap 00317596 2011/11/30 ( REPUBLIC ITS 2,426.40 AP 00317596 2011/11/30 ( REPUBLIC ITS ],871.35 AP 00317596 2011/11/30 ( REPUBLIC ITS 691.32 Ap 00317596 2011/11/30 ( REPUBLIC ITS 786.16 AP 00317596 201 ]/11/30 ( REPUBLIC ITS 732.06 AP 00317596 2011/11/30 ( REPUBLIC ITS 631.61 AP 00317596 2011/11/30 ( REPUBLIC ITS 786.16 AP 00317596 201 Ul 1/30 l REPUBLIC ITS 637.10 AP 00317596 2011/11/301 REPUBLIC ITS 13,000.00 AP 00317596 2011/11/30 ( REPUBLIC ITS 13,000.00 AP 00317596 2011/11/301 REPUBLIC ITS 15,113.69 AP 00317596 2011/1]/301 REPUBLIC ITS 1,041.39 AP 00317596 2011/1]/301 REPUBLIC ITS 12,104.00 AP 00317596 2011/11/301 REPUBLIC ITS 15,577.70 AP 00317596 2011/11/301 REPUBLIC ITS 12,104.00 Ap 00317596 2011/11/301 REPUBLIC ITS 2,378.21 AP 00317596 2011/11/30 ( REPUBLIC ITS 20,341.40 Ap 00317596 2011/11/301 REPUBLIC ITS 12,104.00 AP 00317596 201 I/11/30 ( REPUBLIC ITS 13,000.00 AP 00317596 2011/11/30 ( REPUBLIC ITS 4,199.97 AP 00317596 2011/11/301 REPUBLIC ITS 5,967.15 Ap 00317596 2011/11/301 REPUBLIC ITS 1,388.50 AP 00317596 2011/11/30 ( REPUBLIC PI'S 2,228.50 AP 00317596 2011/11/301 REPUBLIC ITS 754.49 AP 00317596 2011/11/30 ( REPUBLIC ITS 508.07 AP 00317596 2011/11/301 REPUBLIC ITS 368.33 P33 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 5 Curren[ Date; 12/15/: Report; CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 07:5 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Re ig ster 11/30/2011 through 12/13/2011 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP 00317596 2011/11/301 REPUBLIC ITS 634.21 AP 00317596 2011/11/301 REPUBLIC ITS 3,006.01 AP 00317596 2011/11/301 REPUBLIC ITS 783.22 AP 00317596 2011/11/301 REPUBLIC ITS 800.00 AP 00317596 2011/11/30 ( REPUBLIC ITS 800.00 AP 00317596 2011/11/30 ( REPUBLIC [TS 2,450.00 AP 00317596 2011/11/30 ( F.EPUBL[C ITS 2,450.00 AP 00317596 2011/11/301 REPUBLIC ITS ~ 16,091.35 Ap 00317596 2011/11/30 ( REPUBLIC ITS 12,104.00 AP 00317597 2011/11/301 RJ THOMAS MFG COMPANY INC 700.00 AP 00317597 2011/11/30 l FJ THOMAS MFG COMPANY INC 1,390.00 Ap 00317598 2011/11/301 ROBLES, RAUL P 105.00 AP 00317598 2011/11/30 ( ROBLES, RAUL P 105.00 AP 00317598 2011/11/30 ( ROBLES, RAUL P 135.00 AP 00317599 201(/11/30 l RODRIGUEZ INC, R Y 223.55 AP 00317600 2011/11/30 ( SADDLEBACK MATERIALS COMPANY INC 995.61 AP 00317601 2011/11/30 f SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPT 3,350.78 AP 00317602 2011/11/30 ( SAN BERNARDINO CTY AUDITOR CONTROLLEP 55.00 AP 00317603 2011/11/30 ( SAN BERNARDINO CTY FIRE PROTECTION DIST. 457.00 AP 00317604 2011/11/301 SAN BERNAF:DINO CTY OFFICE OF THE ASSESS 840.00 AP 00317605 2011/11/301 SANDS, CHRISTOFER 500.00 AP 00317606 2011/11/301 SBPEA 683.02 AP 00317608 2011/11/301 SEIZMIC ENGINEERING 333.74 AP 00317609 2011/11/301 SHEAKLEY 176.30 Ap 00317609 2011/11/30 ( SHEAKLEY 35.00 AP 00317609 2011/11/30 ( SHEAKLEY ~ 86.00 AP 00317609 2011/11/30 ( SHEAKLEY ] 1.25 AP 00317609 2011/11/30( SHEAKLEY 12.00 AP 00317610 2011/11/30 ( SHERIFFS COURT SERVICES 255.00 Ap 00317611 2011/11/301 SHERIFFS COURT SERVICES 18.70 AP 00317612 2011/11/301 SHERIFFS COURT SERVICES 397.34 AP 00317613 2011/11/301 SHERIFFS COURT SERVICES 150.00 AP 00317614 2011/11/301 SHERIFFS COURT SERVICES 30.51 AP 00317615 2011/11/301 SHERIFFS COURT SERVICES 182.10 Ap 00317616 2011/11/301 SIGN SHOP, THE 41.16 AP 00317618 2011/11/301 SLAY, KEVIN 1,750.00 AP 00317619 2011/11/30 l SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 119.85 AP 00317619 2011/11/30 ( SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 728.47 AP 00317619 201 I/11/30 ( SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 165.02 Ap 00317619 2011/1 ]/30 ( SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 1,894.92 AP 00317619 2011/11/301 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 5,628.1 ] AP 00317619 2011/11/301 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 587.05 AP 00317619 2011/11/301 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 8.66 AP 00317619 2011/11/301 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 5.26 Ap 00317619 2011/11/30 1 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 4.93 P34 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 6 Current Date: 12/15/: Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 07:5 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 11/30/2011 through 12/13/2011 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP 00317619 2011/11/30 ( SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 2,259.05 AP 00317620 2011/11/30 ( SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 1,110.98 AP 00317624 2011/11/30 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 4,465.88 AP 00317624 2011/11/30 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORMA EDISON 8,041.64 AP 00317624 2011/11/30 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 1,455.62 AP 00317624 2011/11/30 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 45.85 AP 00317624 2011/11/30 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.10 AP 00317624 2011/11/30 1 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 38.39 AP .00317624 2011/11/30 1 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 53.72 AP 00317624 2011/11/30 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.33 AP 00317624 2011/11/30 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.19 AP 00317624 2011/11/30 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 50.46 AP 00317624 2011/11/30 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 61.84 AP 00317624 2011/11/30 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 81.63 AP 00317624 201 I/11/30 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 51.30 AP 00317624 2011/11/30 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 219.99 AP 00317624 2011/11/30 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.10 AP 00317624 2011/11/30 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 75.22 AP 00317624 2011/11/30 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 73.63 AP 00317624 2011/11/30 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.10 AP 00317624 2011/11/30 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 70.08 AP 00317624 2011/11/30 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 167.01 AP 00317624 2011/11/30 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.06 AP 00317624 2011/1 ]/301 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 21.48 AP 00317624 20] 1/11/301 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 21.48 AP 00317624 20] 1/11/301 SOUTHERN CALIFORMA EDISON 73.13 AP 00317624 2011/11/30 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 135.37 AP 00317624 2011/11/30 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.19 AP 00317624 2011/11/30 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 93.08 AP 003]7624 2011/11/30 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 31.43 AP 00317624 2011/11/30 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 81.78 AP 00317624 2011/11/30 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 21.32 AP 00317624 2011/1 l/30 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 65.70 AP 00317624 2011/11/30 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 69.88 AP 00317624 2011/11/301 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 84.45 AP 00317624 2011/1 ]/30 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 188.54 AP 00317624 2011/11/301 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 42.00 AP 00317624 2011/11/301 SOUTHERN CALIFORMA EDISON 75.74 AP 00317624 2011/11/30 1 SOUTHERN CALIFORMA EDISON 177.90 AP 00317624 2011/11/301 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.02 AP 00317624 2011/11/301 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ED[SON 82.65 AP 00317624 2011/11/30 1 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 58.05 AP 00317624 2011/11/30 1 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 73.57 AP 00317624 2011/11/30 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 9.87 AP 00317624 2011/11/30 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.03 P35 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 7 Current Date: 12/15/: Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout ~ ~ Time: 07:5 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Aeenda Check Register 11/30/2011 through 12/13/201! Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP 00317624 2011/] 1/30 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 42.26 AP 00317624 2011/I1/301 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.16 AP 00317624 2011/I l/301 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 30.93 AP 00317624 2011/11/301 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 84.07 AP 00317624 2011/11/301 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 123.47 AP 00317624 201!/11/301 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.66 AP 00317624 2011/11/301 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 49.98 AP 00317624 2011/11/301 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.52 AP 00317624 2011/11/301 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 99.28 AP 00317624 2011/11/30 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 55.49 AP 00317624 2011/11/30 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 26.89 AP 00317624 2011/11/30 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 180.82 AP 00317624 2011/11/30 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 70.63 AP 00317624 2011/11/30 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.03 AP 00317624 2011/11/301 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON ~ 21.62 AP 00317624 2011/11/301 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 21.48 AP 00317624 2011/11/301 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 153.89 AP 00317624 2011/11/301 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 21.93 AP 00317624 2011/11/30 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 69.33 AP 00317624 2011/11/301 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 49.63 AP 00317624 2011/11/301 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 125.01 AP 00317624 2011/11/30 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 68.73 AP 00317624 2011/11/301 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 63.59 AP 00317624 2011/11/301 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 7,027.21 AP 00317624. 2011/11/301 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 35.75 AP 00317624 2011/11/301 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 30.98 AP 00317624 2011/11/301 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.94 AP 00317624 2011/11/301 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 30.48 AP 00317624 201 I/I1/30 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 118.01 AP 00317624 2011/11/30 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.90 AP 00317624 2011/11/30 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 573.56 AP 00317624 2011/11/30 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 698.62 AP 00317624 2011/11/301 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 344.63 AP 00317624 2011/11/301 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.82 AP 00317624 2011/11/30 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORMA EDISON 59.98 AP 00317624 2011/11/301 SOUTHERN CALIFORMA EDISON 25.02 AP 00317624 2011/11/301 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.60 AP 00317624 2011/11/301 SOUTHERN CALIFORMA EDISON 23.61 AP 00317624 2011/11/301 SOUTHERN CALIFORMA EDISON 23.71 AP 00317624 2011/11/301 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.71 AP 00317624 2011/11/301 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 48.38 AP 00317624 2011/11/301 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.71 AP 00317624 2011/11/301 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.94 AP 00317624 2011/1l/301 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 40.75 AP 00317624 2011/11/30 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ED[SON 215.04 P36 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 8 Current Date: 12/15/: Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 07:5 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 11/30/2011 through 12/13/2011 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amoum AP 00317624 2011/11/30 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 31.68 AP 00317624 2011/11/30 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORMA EDISON 45.27 AP 00317624 2011/11/30 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORMA EDISON 451.52 AP 00317624 2011/11/30 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 143.80 AP 00317624 2011/1 l/301 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.35 AP 00317624 2011/1 l/30 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 349.43 AP 00317624 2011/11/301 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 28.12 AP 00317624 2011/11/30 1 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.71 AP 00317624 2011/11/30 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.71 AP 00317624 2011/11/301 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 59.23 AP 00317624 2011/11/301 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 360.69 AP 00317624 2011/11/30 1 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.15 AP 00317624 2011/11/301 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 33.04 AP 00317624 2011/11/30 1 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 66.92 AP 00317624 2011/11/30 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 64.51 AP 00317624 2011/11/30 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORMA EDISON 23.71 AP 00317624 2011/11/30 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 92.62 AP 00317624 2011/11/301 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.85 AP 003]7624 2011/11/301 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIAEDISON 213.02 AP 00317624 201 I/11/30 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.16 AP 00317624 2011/11/30 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.02 AP 00317624 2011/1 t/30 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.16 AP 00317624 2011/11/30 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.02 AP 00317624 2011/11/30 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 45.11 AP 00317624 2011/11/30 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 99.46 AP 00317624 2011/11/30 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.03 AP 00317624 2011/11/30 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.55 AP 00317624 2011/11/30 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.23 AP 00317624 2011/11/30 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.33 AP 00317624 2011/11/30 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.71 AP 00317624 2011/1 I/30 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORMA EDISON 190.06 AP 00317624 2011/1 t/30 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.16 AP 00317624 2011/11/30 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 58.20 AP 00317624 2011/11/30 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 77.25 AP 00317624 2011/11/30 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.85 AP 00317624 2011/11/30 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 78.84 AP 00317624 2011/11/301 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.55 AP 00317624 2011/11/30 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORMA EDISON 34.95 AP 00317624 2011/11/301 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 80.24 AP 00317624 20] 1/11/30 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 21.26 AP 00317624 2011/11/301 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.72 AP 00317624 2011/11/301 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.69 AP 00317624 2011/11/30 1 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.78 AP 00317624 2011/11/30 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 2.94 AP 00317624 2011/11/301 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 5.67 P37 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 9 Current Date: 12/15/: Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 07:5 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Aeenda Check Register 11/30/2011 through 12/13/2011 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP 00317624 2011/11/30 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.38 AP 00317624 2011/11/30 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 35.76 Ap 00317624 2011/11/30 f SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 116.82 AP 00317624 2011/11/30 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 308.14 AP 00317624 2011/11/30 ( SOUTHERN.CALIFORNIA EDISON 34.68 AP 00317624 2011/11/30 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 433.20 Ap 00317624 2011/11/301 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22933 AP 00317625 2011/11/30 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 2,160.09 AP 00317627 2011/11/301 SOUTHLAND SPORTS OFFICIALS 460.00 AP 003]7628 2011/]1/301 SPARKLETTS 76.00 AP 00317629 2011/11/301 STEELWORKERS OLDTIMERS FOUNDATION 800.00 AP 00317630 2011/11/30 ( STEVES TOWING AND TRANSPORT 187.50 AP 00317631 2011/11/30 ( STOFA, JOSEPH 10.00 AP 00317632 2011/11/30 l T D GROGAN CONSTRUCTION 3,931.63 AP 00317632 2011/11/30 l T D GROGAN CONSTRUCTION 1,665.79 AP 00317632 201 I/11/30 ( T D GROGAN CONSTRUCTION -393.16 AP 00317632 2011/11/30 ( T D GROGAN CONSTRUCTION -166.58 AP 00317633 2011/11/30 ( TANNER RECOGNITION COMPANY, 0 C 8,911.19 AP 00317634 2011/11/30 ( TMAD TAYLOR & GAINES 18,049.63 AP 00317634 2011/11/30 ( TMAD TAYLOR & GAINES 2,600.00 AP 00317636 2011/11/30 ( UNDERGROUND SVC ALERT OF SO CAL 345.00 Ap 00317637 2011/11/30 ( UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 44.00 AP 00317637 2011/11/30 ( UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 25.85 Ap 00317637 2011/11/30 ( UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 158.74 Ap 00317637 2011/11/30 ( UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 846.09 AP 00317638 2011/11/30 ( UNITED PACIFIC SERVICES INC 8,985.00 AP 00317638 2011/11/301 UNITED PACIFIC SERVICES INC 19,745.00 AP 00317638 2011/11/301 UNITED PACIFIC SERVICES INC 3,700.00 AP 00317639 2011/I1/301 UNITED ROTARY BRUSH CORPORATION 406.57 AP 00317639 2011/11/301 UNITED ROTARY BRUSH CORPORATION 246.83 AP 00317640 2011/11/30 ( UNITED WAY 200.50 AP 00317640 2011/11/301 UNITED WAY 6.00 AP 00317641 2011/11/30 ( UPS 30.85 AP 00317642 2011/11/30 ( UTILIQUEST 1,066.45 AP 00317642 2011/11/30 ( UTILIQUEST 1,232.65 AP 00317644 2011/11/301 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 87.89 AP 00317644 2011/11/301 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 84.78 Ap 00317644 2011/11/301 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 43.60 AP 00317644 2011/11/30 ( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 79.38 Ap 00317644 2011/11/301 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 210.49 Ap 00317644 2011/11/30 ( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 584.72 AP 00317644 2011/11/30 ( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 475.70 AP 00317644 2011/ll/301 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 38.26 AP 00317644 2011/11/30 ( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 114.77 AP 00317644 2011/11/301 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 40.59 P38 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez i Page: 10 Current Dale: 12/15/: Repor[: CK AGENDA REG PORTRAIT RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 07:5 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Resister 11/30/2011 through 12/13/2011 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name ~ Amoum AP 00317644 2011/11/30 ( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 18.11 AP 00317644 2011/11/30 ( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 38.26 AP 00317644 2011/11/30 ( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 18.11 AP 00317644 2011/11/30 ( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 67.57 AP 00317644 2011/11/30 ( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 40.86 AP 00317644 2011/11/30( VERIZONCALIFORNIA 46.87 AP 00317644 2011/11/30 ( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 39.12 AP 003L7644 2011/11/30 ( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 18.62 AP 00317644 2011/11/30 ( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 37.09 AP 00317644 2011/1 l/30 ( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 114.77 AP 00317644 2011/11/30 ( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 37.09 AP 00317644 2011/11/301 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 19.61 AP 00317644 2011/11/30 ( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 149.27 AP 00317644 2011/11/301 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 37.09 AP 00317644 2011/11/301 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 35.67 AP 00317644 2011/11/301 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 20.21 AP 00317644 2011/11/301 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 18.11 AP 00317644 20] 1/11/301 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 38.26 Ap 00317644 2011/11/301 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 18.11 AP 003U644 2011/11/301 VERIZONCALIFORNIA 38.26 AP 00317644 2011/11/301 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 80.31 Ap 00317644 2011/11/301 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 18.11 AP 00317644 20] 1/11/301 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 74.19 AP 00317644 2011/11/301 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 37.09 AP 00317644 2011/11/301 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 18.62 AP 00317644 2011/11/301 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 37.09 AP 003]7644 2011/11/301 VERIZONCALIFORNIA 38.26 Ap 00317644 2011/11/30 ( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 76.52 AP 00317644 2011/11/30 ( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 38.26 AP 00317644 2011/11/301 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 51.56 AP 00317644 2011/ll/301 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 935.59 AP 00317644 2011/11/30 ( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 20.21 AP 00317644 2011/11/30( VERIZONCALIFORNIA 18.11 AP 00317644 2011/11/30 ( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 18.11 Ap 00317644 2011/11/301 VERIZONCALIFORNIA 37.09 AP 00317644 20]1/11/301 VERIZONCALIFORNIA 18.11 AP 00317644 2011/11/301 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 37.09 AP 00317644 2011/11/301 VERIZONCALIFORNIA 18.11 AP 00317644 2011/l l/301 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 20.48 AP 00317644 2011/11/301 VERIZONCALIFORNIA 38.26 AP 00317644 2011/11/30 ( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 58.25 AP 00317644 2011/11/30 ( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 168.74 AP 00317644 2011/11/301 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 659.05 Ap 00317644 2011/] 1/301 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 79.99 Ap 00317645 2011/11/30 ( VILLAGE N[JRSERIES WHOLESALE LLC 897.37 P39 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: I 1 Current Date: 12/15/: Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 07:5 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 11/30/2011 through 12/13/2011 P40 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amoum AP 00317646 2011/11/30 ( VORTEX INDUSTRIES INC 1,588.66 AP 00317647 2011/11/30 ( WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 700.66 AP 00317647 2011/11/30 t WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 66.09 AP 00317647 2011/11/30 ( WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 173.75 AP 00317647 2011/11/30 ( WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 14331 AP 00317647 2011/11/30 ( WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 444.79 AP 00317647 2011/11/30 ( WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 359.24 AP 00317647 2011/11/30 ( WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 422.89 AP 00317647 2011/11/30 ( WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 300.00 AP 00317647 2011/11/301 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 300.00 AP 00317647 2011/11/30 ( WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 300.00 AP 00317647 2011/11/30 ( WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 300.00 AP 0031'7647 2011/11/301 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 381.70 AP 00317647 2011/11/301 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 44.45 AP 00317647 2011/11/301 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 703.52 AP 00317648 2011/11/301 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 216.22 AP 00317649 20] 1/11/301 WESCO RECEIVABLES CORP 49.57 AP 00317649 2011/11/301 WESCORECEIVABLESCORP 206.88 AP 00317649 2011/11/30 ( WESCO RECEIVABLES CORP 99.13 AP 00317649 2011/11/30 ( WESCO RECEIVABLES CORP 42.88 AP 00317649 2011/11/30 ( WESCO RECEIVABLES CORP 369.58 AP 00317649 2011/11/30 ( WESCO RECEIVABLES CORD 880.21 AP 00317650 2011/11/30 ( WESTRUX INTERNA"IIONAL INC 2,126.27 AP 00317651 2011/11/30 ( WILSON AND BELL 802.15 AP 00317653 2011/12/01 ( AIRGAS WEST 500.00 AP 00317653 2011/12/01 ( AIRGAS WEST 120.48 AP 00317653 2011/12/01 1 AIRGAS WEST 83.40 AP 00317654 2011/12/01 ( AUTO BODY 2000 1,541.64 AP 00317655 2011/12/01 t CALSENSE 4,689.94 AP 00317655 2011/12/01 ( CALSENSE 4,689.94 AP 00317656 2011/12/01 1 COMP U ZONE 42.02 AP 00317656 2011/12/01 ( COMP U ZONE 127.50 AP 00317656 2011/12/01 I COMP U ZONE 85.00 AP 00317656 2011/12/01 l COMP U ZONE 127.68 AP 00317656 2011/12/01 l COMP U ZONE 85.00 AP 00317656 2011/12/01 ( COMP U ZONE 85.00 AP 00317656 2011/12/01( COMPUZONE 85.00 AP 00317656 2011/12/01 ( COMP U ZONE 42.02 AP 00317656 2011/12/01 l COMP U ZONE 85.00 AP 00317656 2011/12/01 l COMP U ZONE 85.00 AP 00317656 20] 1/12/01 1 COMP U ZONE 16.16 AP 00317656 2011/12/01 1 COMP U ZONE 85.00 AP 00317656 2011/12/01 1 COMP U ZONE 75.00 AP 00317657 2011/12/011 DAPPER TIRE CO 506.88 AP 00317657 2011/12/01 1 DAPPER TIRE CO 250.79 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 12 Current Dale: 12/15/: Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 07:5 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA A¢enda Check Register 11/30/2011[hrough 12/13/2011 Check No. Check Dale Vendor Name Amount AP 00317659 2011/12/01 ( SWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 69.06 AP 00317659 2011/12/01 ( SWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS -115.81 AP 00317659 2011/12/01 l SWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 172.95 AP 00317659 2011/12/01 ( SWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 23.49 AP 00317660 2011/12/01 I GOLF VENTURES WEST 883.97 AP 00317661 2011/12/01 1 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 60.88 Ap 00317661 2011/12/01 1 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 679.63 AP 00317661 2011/12/01 l HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 75.00 AP 00317661 2011/]2/0] l HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 398.14 AP 00317661 201 I/12/01 ( HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 75.00 AP 00317661 2011/12/01 l HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 72L68 AP 00317662 201 U12/Ol 1 HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS INC 56.00 AP 00317663 2011/12/07 l RBM LOCK AND KEY SERVICE 2.96 AP 00317664 2011/12/071 REPUBLIC ITS 319.14 AP 00317664 2011/12/07 ( REPUBLIC ITS 348.90 AP 00317664 2011/12/07 ( REPUBLIC ITS 319.14 AP 00317664 2011/12/07 ( REPUBLIC ITS 97435 AP 00317664 2011/12/07 ( REPUBLIC ITS 319.14 AP 00317665 201(/12/07 l RESOURCEFUL BAG AND TAG INC 849.00 AP 00317665 2011/12/071 RESOURCEFUL BAG AND TAG INC 214.70 AP 00317666 2011/12/07 ( RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 132.80 AP 00317666 2011/12/07 ( RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 996.00 AP 00317666 2011/12/07 ( RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 102.00 AP 00317666 2011/12/07 ( RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 23,922.00 AP 00317667 2011/12/07 ( RK DIVERSIFIED ENTERTAINMENT INC 1,500.00 AP 00317668 2011/12/07 ( RUTHERFORD FOR SUPERVISOR 2014, JANICE 1,000.00 AP 00317669 2011/12/07 l SAFEL[TE FULFII.LMENT INC 437.93 AP 00317669 2011/12/071 SAFELITE FULFILLMENT INC 228.89 AP 00317669 2011/12/07 l SAFELITE FULFILLMENT INC 228.89 AP 00317670 2011/12/071 SALIB, EVELYN 5.00 AP 00317671 2011/12/071 SCHMIDGALL DVM, JENNIFER ~ 275.00 AP 00317672 2011/12/071 SCHMITZ, BRANDON 30.00 AP 00317673 2011/12/071 SCHOLASTIC BOOKFAIRS 962.11 AP 00317674 2011/12/07 ( SERVANTEZ, CYNTHIA 1,650.00 AP 00317676 2011/12/07 ( SIGMANET 3,540.00 AP 00317676 2011/12/07 f SIGMANET 2,800.00 AP 00317676 2011/]2/07 ( SIGMANET 2,360.00 AP 00317677 2011/12/07 ( SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 215.87 AP 00317677 2011/12/071 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 204.09 AP 00317677 20] 1/12/071 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 4.93 AP 00317678 2011/12/07 ( SOUS, ELDIS 250.00 AP 00317679 2011/12/071 SOTO, SUZETTE 120.00 AP 00317680 2011/12/07 ( SOURCE GRAPHICS 77.49 AP 00317681 2011/12/07 ( STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY 17,055.94 AP 00317681 2011/12/07 ( STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY 3,053.19 P41 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 13 Curren[ Date: 12/15/: Report. CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 07:5 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 11/30/2011 through 12/13/2011 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amoum AP 00317682 2011/12/07 t STERI-CLEAN LLC 540.00 AP 00317683 2011/12/07 l STERICYCLE INC 706.29 AP 00317684 2011/12/07 ( SUNGARD PUBLIC SECTOR INC 3,576.00 AP 00317684 2011/12/07 ( SUNGARD PUBLIC SECTOR INC 3,675.00 AP 00317684 2011/12/07 ( SUNGARD PUBLIC SECTOR INC 3,883.03 AP 00317685 2011/12/07 t SUNGARD PUBLIC SECTOR USER GROUP ASSOC 195.00 AP 00317686 2011/12/07 ( SUNSHINE GROWERS NURSERY INC 53.88 AP 00317687 2011/12/07 ( TAMS WITMARK MUS[C LIBRARY INC 1,205.00 Ap 00317687 2011/12/07 ( TAMS WITMARK MUSIC LIBRARY INC 4,425.00 AP 00317687 2011/12/07 t TAMS WITMARK MUSIC LIBRARY INC 200.00 Ap 00317687 2011/12/07 ( TAMS WITMARK MUSIC LIBRARY INC 300.00 AP 00317688 2011/12/07 ( TESSIER, JEAN YVES 1,500.00 AP 00317689 2011/12/07 ( TRUGREEN LANDCARE 840.00 AP 00317690 2011/12/07 ( U S LEGAL SUPPORT INC 59.75 AP 00317690 2011/12/07 ( U S LEGAL SUPPORT INC 102.25 AP 00317690 2011/12/07 ( U S LEGAL SUPPORT INC 118.72 AP 00317690 2011/12/07 ( U S LEGAL SUPPORT INC 130.46 AP 00317691 2011/12/07 l UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA TRUSTEE FOR PA 1,792.74 AP 00317692 2011/12/071 UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA TRUSTEE FOR PA 28,412.88 AP 00317693 2011/12/07 1 UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA TRUSTEE FOR PA 3,900.00 AP 00317694 2011/12/071 UNITED SITE SERVICES OF CA INC 217.78 AP 00317694 2011/12/07 1 UNITED SITE SERVICES OF CA INC 142.71 AP 00317695 2011/12/071 UNITED TRAFFIC 1,356.55 AP 00317696 2011/12/071 UNITEK TECHNOLOGY INC 11,629.42 AP 00317697 2011/12/071 UPS 80.00 AP 00317698 2011/12/071 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 297.03 AP 00317698 2011/12/07 ( WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 238.77 AP 00317699 2011/!2/07 ( WATSON PAINTING CORPORATION 11,675.00 AP 00317699 2011/12/07 ( WATSON PAINTING CORPORA"PION 17,963.00 AP 00317700 2011/12/07 ( WATUNG, CORRY 5.00 AP 00317701 2011/12/071 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 124.76 AP 00317701 2011/12/07 l WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 6.16 AP 00317701 2011/12/071 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 1,055.89 AP 00317702 2011/12/07 l WEST SANITATION SERVICES INC 337.00 AP 00317703 2011/12/07 ( WESTERN FLOORING INC 274.38 AP 00317704 2011/12/07 t YAP, KOEI 500.00 AP 00317705 2011/12/07 t ZEE MEDICAL INC 156.54 AP 00317706 2011/12/07 t A&V SOFTBALL 1,325.00 Ap 00317707 2011/12/07 ( AA EQUIPMENT RENTALS CO INC 311.09 AP 00317708 2011/12/07 ( ADEYEMQ, ANNAH 130.00 AP 00317709 2011/12/07 ( ADVANCED CHEMICAL TRANSPORT 963.00 AP 00317710 2011/12/071 AEF SYSTEMS CONSULTING INC 262.50 AP 00317711 2011/12/071 AGAPE EMPLOYMENT ~ 682.00 AP 00317711 2011/12/071 AGAPE EMPLOYMENT 12.79 AP 00317711 2011/12/071 AGAPE EMPLOYMENT 682.00 P42 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 14 Current Date: 12/15/: Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 07:5 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 11/30/2011 through 12/13/2011 Check No. Check Dale Vendor Name Amount AP 00317711 2011/12/071 AGAPE EMPLOYMENT 230.22 AP 00317711 2011/12/071 AGAPE EMPLOYMENT 682.00 AP 00317711 2011/12/071 AGAPE EMPLOYMENT 682.00 AP 00317711 2011/12/07 ( AGAPE EMPLOYMENT 682.00 AP 00317711 2011/12/07 ( AGAPE EMPLOYMENT 19.18 AP 0031771 I 2011/12/07 ( AGAPE EMPLOYMENT 682.00 AP 00317711 2011/12/07 ( AGAPE EMPLOYMENT 12.79 AP 00317712 2011/12/07 t ALEXANDER, MIKE 150.00 AP 00317714 201 ]/12/07 ( ALL CITY MANAGEMENT SERVICES INC. 21,212.20 AP 00317715 2011/12/071 ALTA LOMA COMMUNITY BAPTIST CHURCH 750.00 AP 00317716 2011/12/07 ( AMTECH ELEVATOR SERVICES 220.24 AP 00317716 2011/12/07 ( AMTECH ELEVATOR SERVICES .270.46 AP 00317717 2011/12/07 ( BISHOP COMPANY 275.41 AP 00317717 2011/12/07 ( BISHOP COMPANY 200.61 AP 00317717 2011/12/07 ( BISHOP COMPANY 76.53 AP 00317718 2011/12/07 ( BOB HICKS TURF EQUIPMENT 43.51 AP 00317719 2011/12/07 ( BORREGO SOLOR SYSTEMS INC 25,682.33 AP 00317720 2011/12/07 l CAL-STATE RENT A FENCE INC 983.00 AP 00317721 2011/12/07 ( CALIFORNIA BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, STATE 198.78 AP 00317722 2011/12/071 CAPITOL BUILDERS HARDWARE INC. 208.22 AP 00317723 2011/12/071 CASINO DE PARIS INC. 2,600.00 AP 00317724 2011/12/07 1 CHAMPION AWARDS AND SPECIALTIES 8.62 AP 00317725 2011/12/07 ( CITY RENTALS 140.00 AP 00317727 2011/]2/07 ( CORONA CLAY COMPANY INC 2,428.06 AP 003]7730 2011/12/07 ( DELTA DENTAL 38,908.69 AP 00317731 2011/12/07 ( DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES 15.00 AP 00317731 2011/12/07 ( DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES 15.00 Ap 00317731 2011/12/07 ( DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES 15.00 AP 00317731 2011/12/07 ( DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES 15.00 AP 00317732 2011/12/07 ( EARTHWORKS SOIL AMENDMENTS INC. ~ 2,111.66 AP 00317734 2011/12/07 ( ELLIS ENTERPRISES 980.00 AP 00317734 2011/12/07 ( ELLIS ENTERPRISES 150.00 AP 00317734 2011/12/07 ( ELLIS ENTERPRISES 2,500.00 AP 00317734 2011/12/07 l ELLIS ENTERPRISES 300.00 AP 00317735 2011/12/071 EMPLOYEE ACTIVITY COMMITTEE 750.00 AP 00317736 2011/12/071 EXPERIAN 52.24 AP 00317737 2011/12/071 CLEARWATERGRAPHICS 21,179.03 Ap 00317737 2011/12/071 CLEARWATER GRAPHICS 4,025.87 AP 00317738 2011/12/07 l FEDERAL EXPRESS CORD 38.92 AP 00317738 2011/12/07 l FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 21.34 AP 00317739 2011/12/07 f FENCE CRAP[' OF UPLAND INC 530.58 Ap 00317740 2011/12/07 t G AND M BUSINESS INTERIORS 641.27 AP 00317741 2011/12/07 ( GALLS INC 400.00 AP 00317743 2011/12/07 ( GRAINGER 4.61 Ap 00317743 2011/12/07 ( GRAINGER 20.81 P43 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 15 Current Date: 12/15/: Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 07:5 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agettda Check Resister 11/30/2011 through 12/13/2011 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP 00317743 2011/12/071 GRAINGER 13.59 AP 00317743 2011/12/071 GRAINGER 70.80 AP 00317743 2011/12/071 GRAINGER 4.61 AP 00317744 2011/12/071 GREEN ROCK POWER EQUIPMENT 173.22 AP 00317745 2011/12/07 ( HDL COREN AND CONE 350.20 AP 00317746 2011/12/071 HOSE MAN INC 10.87 Ap 00317748 201 I/12/07 ( HYDRO TEK SYSTEMS INC 89.08 AP 00317748 201 I/12/07 ( HYDRO TEK SYSTEMS INC 329.09 AP 00317749 2011/12/07 ( INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 23.51 AP 00317749 2011/12/07 ( INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 58.34 AP 00317749 2011/12/071 INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 5.22 AP 00317749 2011/12/07 I INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 21.76 AP 00317749 2011/12/071 INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 236.37 AP 00317749 2011/12/071 INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 160.29 Ap 00317749 201 I/12/07 ( INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 46.82 AP 00317749 2011/12/07 ( INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 116.17 AP 00317749 201 I/12/07 ( INDEPENDENT STATIONERS ~ 10.40 AP 00317749 2011/12/071 INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 20.31 AP 00317749 2011/12/07 ( INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 50.40 AP 00317749 2011/12/07 ( INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 4.51 AP 00317749 2011/12/07 ( INDEPENDENT STATIONERS -3.62 AP 00317749 2011/12/07 ( INDEPENDENT STATIONERS -8.99 AP 00317749 2011/12/07 ( D~TDEPENDENT STATIONERS -0.81 Ap 00317749 2011/12/07 ( INDEPENDENT STATIONERS -12.34 AP 00317749 2011/12/07 ( INDEPENDENT STATIONERS -30.62 AP 00317749 2011/12/07 l INDEPENDENT STATIONERS -2.74 AP 00317749 2011/12/07 ( INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 13.64 AP 00317749 2011/12/071 INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 90.82 AP 00317749 2011/12/071 INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 53.45 AP 00317749 2011/12/071 INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 3.31 AP 00317749 2011/12/07 ( INDEPENDENT STATIONERS -3.31 AP 00317749 201 I/12/07 ( INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 505.03 AP 00317749 2011/12/07 ( INDEPENDENT STATIONERS -162.14 AP 00317749 2011/12/07 l INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 162.14 AP 00317749 2011/12/07 1 INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 436.36 AP 00317749 2011/12/071 INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 592.48 AP 00317749 2011/12/071 INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 255.84 AP 00317751 2011/12/07 ( INLAND EMPIRE TOURS AND TRANSPORTATIOi 1,027.00 Ap 00317752 2011/12/07 ( INLAND FAIR HOUSING AND MEDIATION BOAR 833.92 AP 00317752 2011/12/07 ( INLAND FAIR HOUSING AND MEDIATION BOAR 679.81 AP 00317753 2011/12/07 ( INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN ]23.50 AP 00317754 2011/12/07 f INTEGRITY DOOR & HARDWARE INC 2,022.77 AP 00317754 2011/12/07 ( INTEGRITY DOOR & HARDWARE INC 163.78 AP 00317755 2011/12/07 ( IRON MOUNTAIN OSDP 2,227.36 AP 00317756 2011/12/07 ( JOHN DEERE LANDSCAPES 426.46 P44 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 16 Current Dale: 12/15/; Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 07:5 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 11/30/2011 through 12/13/2011 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP 00317756 2011/12/07 ( JOHN DEERE LANDSCAPES 116.11 AP 00317756 2011/12/07 ( JOHN DEERE LANDSCAPES ~ 471.41 AP 00317756 2011/12/07 l JOHN DEERE LANDSCAPES 196.91 AP 00317756 2011/12/071 ]OHN DEERE LANDSCAPES 1,227.93 AP 00317757 2011/12/071 JONES AND MAYER, LAW OFFICES OF 1,160.00 AP 00317757 2011/12/071 JONES AND MAYER, LAW OFFICES OF 4,915.50 AP 00317758 2011/12/071 KONE INC 539.06 AP 00317759 2011/12/071 LANDSCAPE STRUCTURES INC ~ 195,632.77 AP 00317759 2011/12/071 LANDSCAPE STRUCTURES INC 168,888.00 AP 00317760 2011/12/071 LARA, MERCY 25.00 AP 00317761 2011/12/071 LEIGHTON CONSULTING INC 3,279.80 AP 00317762 2011/12/07 ( LIEBERT CASSIDY WHITMORE 189.00 AP 00317763 2011/12/071 LINDEN, CYNTHIA ~ 25.00 AP 00317763 2011/12/07 ( LINDEN, CYNTHIA 25.00 AP 00317763 2011/12/071 LINDEN, CYNTHIA 25.00 AP 00317764 2011/12/07 ( LOPEZ, ANGEL 250.00 AP 00317765 2011/12/07 ( MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 108.00 AP 00317765 201 ]/12/07 ( MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 108.00 AP 00317765 2011/12/07 ( MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 108.00 AP 00317765 2011/12/07 ( MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 108.00 AP 00317765 2011/!2/07 ( MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 3,270.50 AP 00317765 2011/12/07 ( MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT MC 280.21 Ap 00317765 2011/12/07 ( MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 63.39 AP 00317765 2011/12/07 l MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 301.92 AP 00317765 2011/12/071 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 113.21 AP 00317765 2011/12/071 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 74.75 AP 00317765 2011/]2/071 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 2,285.04 AP 00317765 2011/12/071 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 938.59 AP 00317765 2011/12/07 ( MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 69.56 AP 00317765 2011/12/07 1 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 86.20 AP 00317765 2011/12/07 l MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 830.61 AP 00317765 2011/12/071 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 225.76 AP 00317766 2011/12/071 MARK CHRISTOPHER INC 101.76 Ap 00317766 2011/12/071 MARK CHRISTOPHERBVC -12.93 AP 00317767 201(/12/07 ( MARTINEZ UNION SERVICE 45.00 AP 00317768 201(/12/07 l MATRIX IMAGING PRODUCTS 3,008.91 AP 00317769 2011/12/07 ( MCI 30.74 AP 00317771 2011/12/07 ( MESA ENERGY SYSTEMS INC 187,953.00 AP 00317771 2011/12/07 ( MESA ENERGY SYSTEMS INC 7,056.00 AP 003]7771 2011/12/07 ( MESA ENERGY SYSTEMS INC 23,928.00 AP 00317771 2011/12/071 MESA ENERGY SYSTEMS INC ~ 41,281.00 AP 00317771 2011/12/071 MESA ENERGY SYSTEMS INC -19,501.00 Ap 00317771 2011/12/071 MESA ENERGY SYSTEMS INC -6,521.00 Ap 00317772 201 I/12/07 1 MICHAEL ASNER CONSULTING 1,250.00 AP 00317772 2011/12/07 l MICHAEL ASNER CONSULTING 1,687.50 P45 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 17 Current Date: 12/15/: Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 07:5 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P46 Agenda Check Register 11/30/2011 through 12/13/2011 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amoum AP 00317773 2011/12/07 ( MIJAC ALARM COMPANY 102.00 AP 00317773 2011/12/07 ( MIIAC ALARM COMPANY 200.00 AP 00317774 2011/12/07 ( MILANES, Y[KCIA 275.00 AP 00317774 2011/12/07 ( MILANES, YIKCIA 300.00 AP 00317774 2011/12/07 ( MILANES, YIKCIA 475.00 AP 00317774 2011/12/07 ( MILANES, YIKCIA 100.00 AP 00317774 2011/12/071 MILANES, YIKCIA 500.00 AP 00317775 2011/12/071 MITY LITE INC. 942.19 AP 003]7775 2011/12/071 MITY LITE INC. 942.]9 AP 00317776 2011/12/071 MOUNTAIN VIEW GLASS AND MIRROR INC 432.87 Ap 00317777 2011/12/07 ( MOUNTAIN VIEW SMALL ENG REPAIR 119.27 AP 00317778 2011/12/07 ( MURADIAN, LESLIE 400.00 AP 00317779 2011/12/07 ( MWI VETERINARY SUPPLY 353.92 AP 00317780 2011/12/07 ( NAPA AUTO PARTS 34.39 AP 00317780 2011/12/07 ( NAPA AUTO PARTS 42.53 AP 00317782 2011/12/07 ( NATIONAL DATA & SURVEYING SERVICES 192.00 Ap 00317784 2011/12/07 f NOVARTIS ANIMAL HEALTH US INC 377.84 AP 00317785 2011/12/07 ( NPI PRODUCTION SERVICES INC 22,137.00 AP 00317786 2011/12/07 ( OFFICE DEPOT 1.05 AP 00317786 2011/12/07 ( OFFICE DEPOT 2.60 AP 00317786 2011/12/07 ( OFFICE DEPOT 0.23 AP 00317786 2011/12/07 ( OFFICE DEPOT 166.47 AP 00317787 2011/12/07 ( OMNITRANS 1,357.79 AP 00317788 2011/12/07 ( PAINTER, DAWN 65.00 AP 00317789 2011/12/07 ( PARAISO, OLIVER 500.00 AP 00317789 2011/12/07 ( PARAISO, OLIVER 500.00 AP 00317790 2011/12/07 ( PEREZ, DOMINICK 1,750.00 AP 00317791 2011/12/071 PIXELPUSHERS INC 7,975.00 AP 00317791 2011/12/07 ( PIXELPUSHERS INC 6,195.00 AP 00317791 2011/12/071 PIXELPUSHERS INC ~ 3,500.00 AP 00317792 2011/12/071 PRIDE LAUNDRY SYSTEMS INC 99.50 AP 00317793 2011/12/071 PROMOTIONS TEES & MORE 542.05 AP 00317794 2011/12/07 l QUINTANA, LISA 40.00 AP 00317795 2011/12/07 l APPLEBEES NEIGHBORHOOD GRILL AND BAR 500.00 AP 00317796 2011/12/07 ( ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES 3.35 AP 00317797 2011/12/07 ( ASAP POWERSPORTS 1,297.08 AP 00317797 2011/12/07 ( ASAP POWERSPORTS 1,740.15 AP 00317797 2011/12/071 ASAP POWERSPORTS 327.25 AP 00317799 201 U12/07 l AVALON COLLISION CENTER 879.70 AP 00317800 2011/12/07 ( BOLTON, HEATHER 31.64 AP 00317800 2011/12/07 ( BOLTON, HEATHER 48.45 AP 00317800 2011/12/07 ( BOLTON, HEATHER 68.27 Ap 00317801 2011/12/07 ( BUTLER SCHEIN ANIMAL HEALTH SUPPLY 51.40 AP 00317801 2011/12/07 ( BUTLER SCHEIN ANIMAL HEALTH SUPPLY 718.00 AP 00317801 201 I/12/07 ( BUTLER SCHEIN ANIMAL HEALTH SUPPLY 563.72 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 18 Curren[ Date: 12/15/; Report; CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 07:5 Check No. AP 00317801 AP 00317801 AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP 00317801 00317801 00317801 00317801 00317804 00317806 00317807 00317809 00317809 00317809 00317809 00317809 00317810 00317811 00317811 00317812 00317813 00317815 00317816 003 U817 00317817 00317818 00317818 00317818 00317818 00317818 00317820 00317821 00317821 00317821 00317821 00317821 00317821 00317821 00317821 00317821 00317821 00317822 00317823 00317824 00317825 00317826 003]7826 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Aeenda Check Register 11/30/20111hrough 12/13/2011 Check Date Vendor Name 2011/12/07 ( BUTLER SCHEIN ANIMAL HEALTH SUPPLY 2011/12/07 ( BUTLER SCHEIN AN[MAL HEALTH SUPPLY 2011/12/07 ( BUTLER SCHEIN ANIMAL HEALTH SUPPLY 2011/12/07 ( BUTLER SCHEIN ANIMAL HEALTH SUPPLY 2011/12/07 ( BUTLER SCHEIN ANIMAL HEALTH SUPPLY 2011/12/07 ( BUTLER SCHEIN ANIMAL HEALTH SUPPLY 2011/12/07 ( CAIN, RUTH 2011/12/07 l CHAFFEY JOINT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DIST 2011/12/07 ( CHOZEN MARTIAL ARTS 2011/12/07 ( CORNERSTONE RECORDS MANAGEMENT 2011/12/07 ( CORNERSTONE RECORDS MANAGEMENT 2011/12/07 ( CORNERSTONE RECORDS MANAGEMENT 2011/12/07 l CORNERSTONE RECORDS MANAGEMENT 2011/12/071 CORNERSTONE RECORDS MANAGEMENT 2011/12/071 CYCLERY USA INC. 2011/12/071 DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION 2011/12/07 ( DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION 2011/12/07 ( DEVICES FOR LIFE LLC 2011/12/07 1 DIAMOND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 2011/12/07 1 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 2011/12/071 FESTIVAL OF THE ARTS 2011/12/071 FLEET SERVICES INC. 2011/12/071 FLEET SERVICES INC. 2011/12/071 FORD OF UPLAND INC 2011/12/07 I FORD OF UPLAND INC 2011/12/071 FORD OF UPLAND INC 2011/12/071 FORD OF UPLAND INC 2011/12/071 FORD OF UPLAND INC 2011/12/07 1 GRAFFITI TRACKER INC 2011/12/071 GRAINGER 2011/12/071 GRAINGER 2011/12/071 GRAINGER 2011/12/07 ( GRAINGER 2011/12/07 ( GRAINGER 2011/12/07 ( GRAINGER 2011/12/07 ( GRAINGER 2011/12/07 ( GRAINGER 2011/12/07 ( GRAINGER 2011/12/071 GRAINGER 2011/12/071 GRAPHICS FACTORY PRINTING INC. 2011/12/07 l GTM PERFORMANCE ENGR 2011/12/07 ( HARTZ, JULIE 2011/12/07 1 HILLS PET NUTRITION SALES INC 2011/12/08 l CLEARWATER GRAPHICS 2011/12/08 1 CLEARWATER GRAPHICS User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 19 Report, CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout P47 Amount 132.53 7.54 415.05 280.80 21.32 189.90 26.64 971.52 480.00 922.25 767.88 741.49 741.49 889.18 ] 7.20 3,375.13 -168.76 2,832.95 212.37 8.68 2,780.00 5.02 291.93 37.59 350.17 655.19 37.59 153.47 2,260.46 17.35 32.88 72.96 99.34 40.99 8.83 -8.83 83.79 59.35 65.13 674.73 59.21 250.00 491.46 21,179.03 4,025.87 Current Date: 12/15/: Time: 07:5 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 11/30/2011 through 12/13/2011 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amoum AP 00317828 2011/12/08 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 73.60 AP 00317828 2011/12/08 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,415.91 AP 00317828 2011/12/08 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 163.59 AP 00317828 2011/12/08 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 73.60 AP 00317828 2011/12/08 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 415.20 AP 00317828 2011/12/08 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 208.20 AP 00317828 2011/12/08 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 307.57 AP 00317828 2011/12/08 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 189.08 AP 00317828 2011/12/08 l CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 187.34 AP 00317828 2011/12/08 1 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 143.86 AP 00317828 2011/12/08 l CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 126.48 AP 00317828 2011/12/08 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 176.23 AP 00317828 2011/12/08( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 271.84 AP 00317828 2011/12/08 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 231.24 Ap 00317828 20(1/12/08 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 263.88 AP 00317828 2011/12/08 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 861.96 AP 00317828 2011/12/08 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 957.59 AP 00317828 2011/12/08 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 399.27 AP 00317828 2011/12/08 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 616.04 AP 00317828 20] 1/12/081 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 131.69 AP 00317828 2011/12/081 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 167.24 AP 00317828 2011/12/08 1 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 659.31 AP 00317828 2011/I2/OS l CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 850.58 AP 00317828 2011/12/08 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 423.16 Ap 00317828 2011/12/081 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 900.67 AP 00317828 2011/12/081 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 552.57 AP 00317828 2011/12/08 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 347.50 AP 00317828 2011/12/08( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 89.69 AP 00317828 2011/12/08 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 544.53 AP 00317828 2011/12/081 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 282.72 AP 00317828 2011/12/08 f CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 324.53 Ap 00317828 2011/12/081 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 129.20 AP 00317828 2011/12/081 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 114.53 AP 00317828 2011/12/081 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 224.98 Ap 00317828 2011/12/081 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 98.66 AP 00317828 2011/12/08 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 336.48 AP 00317828 2011/12/08 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 100.65 AP 00317828 2011/12/08 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,003.13 AP 00317828 2011/12/08 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 100.41 AP 00317828 2011/12/08 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 222.99 Ap 00317828 2011/12/08 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 234.27 AP 00317828 201 I/12/08 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 105.62 AP 00317828 2011/12/081 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 177.20 AP 00317828 2011/12/08 ( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 448.90 AP 00317835 2011/12/08 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORMA EDISON 2,931.72 P48 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 20 Current Dale: 12/15/: Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 07:5 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 11/30/2011 through 12/13/2011 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP 00317835 2011/12/08 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.76 AP 00317835 2011/12/081 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.76 AP 00317835 2011/12/081 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.66 AP 00317835 2011/12/08 1 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.01 AP 00317835 2011/12/08 I SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.76 AP 00317835 2011/12/08 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 21.49 AP 00317835 2011/12/081 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 155.76 AP 00317835 2011/12/08 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 21.99 AP 00317835 201 I/12/08 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.76 AP 00317835 2011/12/08 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNL\ EDISON 7.13 AP 00317835 2011/12/08 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.76 AP 00317835 2011/12/08 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNL4 EDISON 22.66 AP 00317835 201 I/12/08 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.66 AP 00317835 2011/12/08 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 21.99 AP 00317835 2011/12/08 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.76 AP 00317835 2011/12/08 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 58.43 AP 00317835 2011/12/08 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 85.30 AP 00317835 2011/12/08 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 58.99 AP 00317835 2011/12/08 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.21 AP 00317835 20 (1/12/08 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 72.48 AP 00317835 2011/12/08 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORMA EDISON 22.90 AP 00317835 2011/12/08 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.66 AP 00317835 2011/12/08 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.76 AP 00317835 2011/12/08 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.90 AP 00317835 2011/12/08 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.56 AP 00317835 2011/12/08 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORMA EDISON 22.76 AP 00317835 2011/12/08 1 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 101.25 AP 00317835 2011/12/081 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 135.89 AP 00317835 2011/12/08 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.52 AP 00317835 2011/12/081 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.90 AP 00317835 2011/12/08 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 26.19 AP 00317835 2011/12/08 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.76 AP 00317835 2011/12/08 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.66 AP 00317835 201 I/12/08 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.53 AP 00317835 201 I/12/08 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 26.32 AP 00317835 201(/12/08 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.76 AP 00317835 2011/12/08 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.99 AP 00317835 2011/12/08 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.76 AP 00317835 2011/12/08 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 27.63 AP 00317835 2011/12/08 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 31.70 AP 00317835 2011/12/08 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 64.46 AP 00317835 201 ]/12/08 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 31.57 AP 00317835 2011/12/081 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.66 AP 00317835 2011/12/08 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.13 AP 00317835 201 I/12/OS l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 26.60 P49 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 21 Current Date: 12/15/: Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 07:5 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 11/30/2011 through 12/13/2011 Check No. Check Dale Vendor Name Amoum AP 00317835 2011/12/08 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.66 AP 00317835 2011/12/08 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.89 AP 00317835 2011/12/08 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.79 AP 00317835 2011/12/08 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.75 AP 00317835 2011/12/081 SOUTHERN CALIFORMA EDISON 22.76 AP 00317835 2011/12/08 1 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.89 AP 00317835 2011/12/081 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 21.63 AP 00317835 2011/12/081 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.99 AP 00317835 2011/12/08 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 106.23 AP 00317835 2011/12/08 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 59.40 AP 00317835 2011/12/08 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.66 AP 00317835 2011/12/08 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 104.70 AP 00317835 2011/12/08 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.21 AP 00317835 201 U12/OS ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 612.18 AP 00317835 ~2011/l2/08 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 34.53 AP 00317835 2011/12/08 l SOUTHERN CALIFORMA EDISON 70.08 AP 00317835 2011/12/08 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 58.91 AP 00317835 2011/12/081 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.26 AP 00317835 2011/12/081 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 158.69 AP 00317835 2011/12/08 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 21.62 AP 00317835 2011/12/081 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 49.27 Ap 00317835 2011/12/08 I SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.60 AP 00317835 2011/12/081 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.60 AP 00317835 2011/12/08 1 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.60 AP 00317835 2011/12/081 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 48.12 AP 00317835 2011/12/081 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 67.48 AP 00317835 2011/12/08 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 61.66 AP 00317835 2011/12/08 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 59.72 AP 00317835 2011/12/08 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.89 AP 00317835 2011/12/08 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.99 AP 00317835 2011/12/08 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.13 AP 003U835 2011/12/081 SOUTHERN CALIFORMAEDISON 54.24 AP 00317835 2011/12/081 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.89 AP 00317835 201 U12/OS l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.66 AP 00317835 2011/12/08 t SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 59.47 AP 00317835 2011/12/08 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 26.86 AP 00317835 2011/12/08 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.89 AP 00317835 2011/12/08 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.99 AP 00317835 2011/12/08 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.89 AP 00317835 2011/12/08 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.56 AP 00317835 2011/12/081 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.03 AP 00317835 2011/12/08 1 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 102.75 AP 00317835 2011/12/081 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 93.34 AP 00317835 2011/12/081 SOUTHERN CALIFORMA EDISON 22.99 Ap 00317835 2011/12/08 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 21.48 P50 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 22 Current Date: 12/15/: Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 07:5 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA A¢enda Check Register 11/30/2011[hrougk 12/13/2011 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP 00317835 2011/12/08 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.13 AP 00317835 2011/12/08 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.76 AP 00317835 201 U12/08 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.99 AP 00317835 2011/12/08 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 37.35 AP 00317835 2011/12/081 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 61.26 AP 00317835 2011/12/08 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.89 AP 00317835 2011/12/08 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.89 AP 00317835 2011/12/08 f SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.89 AP 00317835 2011/12/08 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.62 AP 00317835 2011/12/08 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 30.89 AP 00317835 2011/12/08 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 96.35 AP 00317835 20 L1/12/08 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 21.28 AP 00317835 2011/12/08 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.89 AP 00317835 2011/12/081 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.89 AP 00317835 2011/12/081 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 71.83 AP 00317835 2011/12/081 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 217.69 AP 00317835 2011/12/08 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 31.47 AP 00317835 2011/12/081 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.89 AP 00317835 2011/12/081 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.99 AP 00317835 2011/12/081 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.89 AP 00317835 2011/12/081 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.61 AP 00317835 2011/12/08 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 76.90 AP 00317835 2011/12/08 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.32 AP 00317835 2011/12/08 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 225.35 AP 00317835 2011/12/08 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 73.38 AP 00317835 2011/12/081 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.99 AP 00317835 2011/12/081 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.89 AP 00317835 2011/12/08 ( ~ SOUTIERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 69.37 AP 00317835 2011/12/081 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.74 AP 00317835 2011/12/081 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.89 AP 00317835 2011/12/08 1 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 121.49 AP 00317835 2011/12/08 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 26.72 AP 00317835 2011/12/08 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.89 AP 00317835 2011/12/08 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 27.23 AP 00317835 2011/12/08 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 117.32 AP 00317835 201 I/12/08 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 739.91 AP 00317835 2011/12/OR 1 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 47.26 AP 00317835 2011/12/08 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 52.09 AP 00317835 2011/12/08 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.99 AP 00317835 2011/12/08.( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 21.19 AP 00317835 2011/12/08 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.66 AP 00317835 2011/12/08 1 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.89 AP 00317835 2011/12/081 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 75.44 AP 00317835 2011/12/08 I SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.99 Ap 00317835 2011/12/08 1 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.99 P51 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 23 Current Date: 12/15/: Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 07:5 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 11/30/2011 through 12/13/2011 Check No. Check Dale Vendor Name Amoum AP 00317835 2011/12/081 SOUTHERN CAL[FORMA EDISON 76.97 AP 00317835 2011/12/081 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.79 AP 00317835 2011/12/081 SOUTHERN'CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.89 AP 00317835 2011/12/081 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 35.67 AP 00317835 2011/12/081 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.89 AP 00317835 2011/12/081 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 41.42 AP 003]7835 2011/12/08 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.89 AP 00317835 2011/12/08 f SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.89 AP 00317835 2011/12/08 f SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 57.83 AP 00317835 2011/12/08 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.56 AP 00317835 2011/12/081 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.89 AP 00317835 2011/12/08 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 137.34 AP 00317835 2011/12/081 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.89. Ap 00317835 2011/12/08 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 33.36 AP 00317835 2011/12/081 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.21 AP 00317835 2011/12/081 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 28.78 AP 00317835 2011/12/08 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 21.99 AP 00317835 2011/12/08 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 71.25 AP 003 ] 7835 2011/12/08 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.89 AP 00317835 2011/12/08 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.99 AP 00317835 2011/12/08 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.89 AP 00317835 2011/12/08 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.21 AP 00317835 2011/12/08 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.94 AP 00317835 2011/12/08 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 100.13 AP 00317835 2011/12/08 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 21.91 AP 00317835 2011/12/081 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 50.27 AP 00317835 2011/12/081 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 50.07 AP 00317835 2011/12/081 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.89 AP 00317835 2011/12/08 1 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 80.71 Ap 00317835 2011/12/08 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNL4 EDISON 85.80 AP 00317835 2011/12/08 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.13 Ap 00317835 2011/12/08 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 48.78 AP 00317835 2011/12/08 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 79.83 AP 00317835 2011/12/08 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.99 AP 00317835 2011/12/08 1 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.99 AP 00317835 2011/12/08 1 SOUTHERN CALIFORMA EDISON 65.02 AP 00317835 2011/12/08 1 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 2,395.63 AP 00317835 2011/12/081 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 65.04 AP 00317835 2011/12/081 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.35 AP 00317835 2011/12/081 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 61.41 AP 00317835 2011/12/081 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.21 AP 00317835 2011/12/081 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.89 Ap 003]7835 2011/12/081 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIAEDISON 37.33 AP 00317835 2011/] 2/08 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 38.69 AP 00317835 2011/]2/08 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 142.62 P52 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 24 Curren[ Date: 12/15/: Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 07:5 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 11/30/2011 through 12/13/2011 Check No. Check Dale Vendor Name ~ Amoum AP 00317835 2011/12/08 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.99 AP 00317835 2011/12/08 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.99 AP 00317835 2011/12/081 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.99 AP 00317835 2011/12/081 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.99 AP 00317835 2011/12/081 SOUTHERN CAL[FORMA EDISON 22.99 AP 00317835 2011/12/081 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON ~ 22.77 AP 00317835 2011/12/081 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.66 AP 00317835 201 I/12/OS l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.30 AP 00317835 2011/12/08 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.13 AP 00317835 2011/12/08 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.90 AP 00317835 2011/12/08 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.99 AP 00317835 2011/12/08 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.79 AP 00317835 2011/12/08 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 133.91 AP 00317835 2011/12/08 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 182.32 AP 00317835 2011/12/08 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNL4 EDISON 60.51 AP 00317835 2011/12/081 SOUTHERN CALIFORMA EDISON 51.25 AP 00317835 2011/12/08 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.66 AP 00317835 2011/12/08 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 64.94 AP 00317835 201 I/12/OS ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.68 AP 00317835 2011/12/08 f SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.89 AP 00317835 201 l/12/08 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 80.43 AP 00317835 2011/12/08 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 45.72 AP 00317835 2011/1 Z/08 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 77.28 AP 00317835 2011/12/08 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 52.34 AP 00317835 201 Ul2/08 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 44.58 AP 00317835 201 I/12/08 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 257.83 AP 00317835 2011/12/08 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 90.05 AP 00317835 201 I/12/08 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 46.22 AP 00317835 201 I/12/08 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.74 AP 00317835 2011/12/08 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 73.80 AP 00317835 2011/12/08 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.66 AP 00317835 2011/12/08 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.89 AP 00317835 2011/12/08 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 33.01 AP 00317835 201 V12/081 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.68 AP 00317835 2011/12/08 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.99 AP 00317835 2011/12/08 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.89 AP 00317835 2011/12/08 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 47.74 AP 003!7835 2011/12/08 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.99 AP 00317835 201 I/12/08 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 284.41 AP 00317835 201 I/12/08 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 311.59 AP 00317835 2011/12/08 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 89.20 AP 00317835 2011/12/08 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 138.24 AP 00317835 201 U12/08 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORMA EDISON 22.99 AP 00317835 2011/12/081 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.99 AP 00317835 2011/12/08 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.66 P53 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 25 Current Date: 12/15/: Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 07:5 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 11/30/2011 through 12/13/2011 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP 00317835 2011/12/081 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.76 AP 00317835 2011/12/081 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 4.90 AP 00317836 2011/12/081 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 49.42 AP 00317836 2011/12/08 1 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 41.72 AP 00317837 2011/12/081 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 475.70 AP 00317837 2011/12/08 ( VERIZON CALIFORNIA ~ 475.70 AP 00317837 2011/12/081 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 373.51 AP 00317837 2011/12/081 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 38.26 AP 00317837 2011/12/08 l VERIZON CALIFORNIA 700.52 AP 00317837 2011/12/081 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 38.26 AP 00317837 2011/12/08 ( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 35.67 AP 00317837 2011/12/08( VERIZONCALIFORNIA 35.67 AP 00317837 2011/12/08 ( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 35.67 AP 00317837 2011/12/08 ( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 38.26 AP 00317837 2011/12/08 ( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 38.26 AP 00317837 2011/12/08 ( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 18.62 AP 00317837 2011/12/08 ( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 35.67 AP 00317837 2011/12/08 ( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 35.67 AP 00317837 2011/12/08 ( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 242.14 AP 00317837 2011/12/08 ( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 18.62 AP 00317837 2011/12/08 ( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 35.67 AP 00317837 2011/12/08 l VERIZON CALIFORNIA 20.21 Ap 00317837 2011/12/08 1 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 1 11.27 AP 00317837 2011/12/08 ( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 124.63 AP 00317837 2011/12/08 ( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 37.21 AP 00317837 2011/12/08 ( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 387.50 Ap 00317837 2011/12/08 ( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 38.26 AP 00317837 2011/12/08 ( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 481.18 AP 00317837 2011/12/08 ( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 76.52 AP 00317837 2011/12/08 ( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 207.86 AP 00317837 2011/12/08 ( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 584.72 AP 00317838 2011/12/08 ( AIRGAS WEST 76.69 AP 00317838 2011/12/08 ( AIRGAS WEST 146.67 AP 00317839 2011/12/08 ( AUTO BODY 2000 2,711.29 AP 00317840 2011/12/08 ( DAPPER TIRE CO 900.21 AP 00317841 2011/12/08 l DEKRA-CITE INDUSTRIES INC 8,444.89 AP 00317841 2011/12/08 1 DEKRA-CITE INDUSTRIES INC 156.30 AP 00317842 2011/12/08 ( EWH1G IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 195.07 AP 00317844 2011/12/08 1 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 75.00 AP 00317844 201 I/12/08 ( HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 629.40 AP 00317844 2011/12/08 ( HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 75.00 AP 00317844 201(/12/08 l HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 120.78 AP 00317844 2011/12/08 l HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 75.00 AP 00317844 2011/12/08 ( HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 940.99 AP 00317844 2011/12/081 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 75.00 P54 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 26 Current Dale: 12/15/: Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 07:5 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Re ig ster I1/30/2011through 12/13/2011 Check No. Check Dale Vendor Name Amount AP 00317844 2011/12/08 1 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 60.30 AP 00317844 2011/12/081 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 61.48 AP 00317845 2011/12/081 HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS INC 64.28 AP 00317845 2011/12/081 HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS INC 33.20 AP 00317845 2011/12/081 HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS INC 90.89 AP 00317846 2011/12/081 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 203.80 AP 00317846 2011/12/08 1 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 422.20 AP 00317846 2011/12/081 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 167.40 Ap 00317846 2011/12/081 IDILAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 181.40 AP 00317846 2011/12/081 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 716.20 AP 00317846 2011/12/081 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 173.00 AP 00317847 2011/12/081 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 380.45 AP 00317847 2011/12/081 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 349.77 Ap 00317847 2011/12/081 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 150.41 AP 00317848 2011/12/08 t INTERSTATE BATTERIES 52.71 AP 00317848 2011/12/08 f INTERSTATE BATTERIES 39.15 AP 00317848 20t (/12/08 ( INTERSTATE BATTERIES 300.46 AP 00317848 2011/12/08 ( INTERSTATE BATTERIES 199.32 AP 00317849 2011/12/08 ( LAB SAFETY SUPPLY INC 22.60 AP 003!7850 2011/12/08 ( LIMS AUTO INC 38.12 AP 00317850 2011/12/08 1 LIMS AUTO INC 38.12 AP 00317850 2011/12/08 ( LIMS AUTO INC 77.70 AP 00317850 2011/12/08 ( LIMS AUTO INC 491.29 AP 00317850 2011/12/08 1 LIMS AUTO INC 38.12 AP 00317850 2011/12/08 ( LIMS AUTO INC - 588.51 AP 00317850 2011/12/08 ( LIMS AUTO INC 660.27 AP 00317850 2011/12/08 ( LIMS AUTO INC 532.41 AP 00317850 2011/12/08 l LIMS AUTO INC 125.62 AP 00317850 2011/12/08 ( LIMS AUTO INC 38.12 AP 00317850 2011/12/081 LIMS AUTO INC 38.12 AP 00317850 2011/12/081 LIMS AUTO INC 277.83 AP 00317852 2011/12/081 MAIN STREET SIGNS 107.59 AP 00317853 2011/12/081 BRAMBILA, RUBEN 5,833.33 AP 00317854 2011/12/08 l SCORPION BACKHOE 41,500.00 AP 00317854 2011/12/08 ( SCORPION BACKHOE -4,150.00 AP 00317854 2011/12/08 ( SCORPION BACKHOE -320.00 AP 00317854 2011/12/08 ( SCORPION BACKHOE 900.00 AP 00317854 2011/12/08 ( SCORPION BACKHOE -90.00 AP 00317855 2011/12/08 ( SCORPION BACKHOE 3,200.00 EP 00002203 2011/11/30 ( CALIF GOVERNMENT VEBA/RANCHO CUCAMOt 1,300.00 EP 00002203 2011/11/30 ( CALIF GOVERNMENT VEBA/RANCHO CUCAMO] 7,075.00 EP 00002204 2011/12/07 ( SAN BERNARDINO CTY SHERIFFS DEPT 2,238,837.00 EP 00002205 2011/12/07 ( SHELL ENERGY NORTH AMERICA 162,722.20 EP 00002206 2011/12/07 ( VIASYN INC 3,137.00 EP 00002207. 2011/12/071 CITIGROUP ENERGY INC 69,781.25 P55 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 27 Curren[ Date: 12/15/: Report CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 07:5 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 11/30/2011 through 12/13/2011 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name P56 Amoum Total for Entity: 4,879,090.87 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 28 Report; CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Current Date: l2/I5/: Time: 07:5 P57 d 0 E U u O U C N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N U c ~ r°> 0 ~ vI V V ~ ~ a C ~ ~ £ ~o~> O c c a° z ~. a U ;=z U~ ~ ~ ___ _ f i o n m rv y °o J O m O ~ b N b is o ~ ~ o m n > N N C'1 f 17 L`. ° d m m m o ~ N N W O ~ ~ o O M ° Z' ~ e m ~ ~ . . m m b b ~ r m m aD m Q ~ f O e ~ 0 a Y d O J m d ~ i . _ m N m ym N m fNp N P m m m O N m 1~ O m d Q o n d m 1~ m P O N Q M N b r N Oi r b N b b O O y j N m ~y W ~ q 1~ N m O N O ~ 1 Q N OI y [O 01 N N g ° N o m b M m o r e O m o m b m p N N m O b r OI O O O 0 a j m N N d n o 0 o r c m ~ p o 0 o N mj b a b n ° b m a o o n ~ n pi N O N r b N ^ ~ N {"1 b C d d V g c c LL U g '~ °o d w U E d 0 j _ N ~ ~ = a Ti y w o e ° ~ `~ m E ~ Q r d a e « .~ m ~~Qj a N C j J IL F ~ ~ c ~ O d m E _U d C O Cv a ~. C ~c m Uw N ~~ m U ~~ 4 c d U _ O_ f > t y ~ o ~i o c i~ o ~ a m d a ao a a d E a a `-°ac c a L {Q m C J a - O uE j a d nL C d F L r C d ~ O N . J+ C _ 1 a C m C - d > d 6 O Sd n `o y d F a t0 p U U ~ Q d _ O m d O L ~ ~ N E ° E so x m ~ fN > n ~ c ° 01 m U C d V aL_ O d " 6 d T ~. ° d a U u °. .. O ~ d n9 c o 0 u ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ d 0 o H E 3 ° O N N ~~ > C ~ d I~ p ' m NN n m Y ' d U L ~ c m u L d y m 3 ~ m LL r o L m C O _ 09 E - _> U ~ o n n m 3 d a O L O m m N m C ~' d e N T m D) c ' b o b vi d U)'U E s ._ d v u' ^ ~ wE° ~ Q W ~ m p i~ C m L O O B O O N_ C N N N a p LL ~ ~ C p L d n 3 ~ U m «Nm. U d m -cam m E m - d d m d> y r L C ~ d = m N = `d a ac o C C C w t+1 >' d N d U d N m C m m ~ IO do ~ c U " UO E `o `w N c d m O ~ d~ ~ ~ O m ~` ' d m r d G N d _ _ m o d n ~ c ~ A ~ >d dE e ` d 0 L N d L d ~ a W C ~ ' :~ C m S:r C N C 0 F 6 W ~ Q m ~ ~ U i F rn - i P58 am ;, ~ - A 7 0 a E r N ~ O O p Q O W a 0 0 d q Y ~R' O m ~ N N A ~ n Q n Q 0 O O O o O O 0 m r N n N j m N q n Q n Q N y O O O O (Q ~ N N C C O d d ~ R £ d N ~ ~ N ~ ~ n V ~ C is n N n N U ~ _ ~ M a °0 0 O A N~ 0 0 r2 ~a ~ O y ~ O O ~ LLL O O .OZ A~ ~,a o ?o v a a d m m c A c ~p Q m O m O Z ~ N LL U~1 Z_ Y U d y ~ Z w O, N x _N U ¢ J d Q U c O i0 J O d p Y' C a ~ N m c E c LL c~ C m B b O ~ Z o d 6 d C O U O C d y OI Q b p U a m u m m ~_ ~ U J y U lh [7 ` N Ct VI Q N (O (p b b b' N f f N f b f0 b (O f0 ' b f0 Q Q 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ a n N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N S b ~ t7 N ~~ N 0 V O 1~ O Q N Y m N n A A~ Q A^ V Q^ U O O ~ O N N ~ O N ~ N N N N N N ~ N N N O ~ ~ M M f0 O~ 10 t~ ~ m O ~ ~ [ V [~ O b i 1~ < b N ~ (~ a (7 b ~ 0 ~ d t O O O O O O O O ~ ~ r O O O O O O O H O O O O r p ~ ~ m m O N O N Cl N b CJ O O C'1 m b Q Y] n m O N fD Q b b m ~ LL ~ m b b O (7 b m O' fp b O n Gl m fp ^ fp O n ` Q r m N m N O d K p Q N N N N b n b b b N b m m b 10 N b N ~ n O O a ~ N O b O b O O N M O O n b u~ N W m O O O b O O O O O b n O Ol b O th N O M M N n n Q n N N N O O O n N O O O Q m b n O fp b b n O fp Q Q N b C'1 O f0 b 10 N O Nl OJ O fD W n n (V (V IV (~ ~ fV ~ ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ Ni ~ N ~ ~ A N N ~ ~ N N ~- X 0 0 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N R N N 10 N R 10 A N N 2 N N O O m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 b O O b O 0 0 0 b 0 0 0 0 0~ 0 O O N O O O O N O N n n n^ b O N b 0 0 0 n 0 0 ~ 0 0 N fD b O fp N N n O b Q Q YI O O b n b b O 17 b b O !O b n n N N N l7 ~ N ~ ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ tt r N ~ ~ A N N ~ ~ N N ~ ~ 0 0 b ~ O Q O O ~ O O O O N O N m O O O O O O O O O O m n O Q Q O N b ~ 0 0 N Q O QI 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 b N 1p O f0 Q O N n X 0 0 i n n n lh 4l O O O O O O O O O O m n b N O O mN O Ib~l ~~ O O ~~ N m m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m Q m G OI t O m N N b O N M (O 01 m (O O O O O O O O O O O N m m m o m m o m m m m o 0 o m m m m o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o m m Q m o m m o m m m .n o 0 o m m e e o o N .n o 0 o b o o m CJ Cl ~ Q ~ ~ N ~- N Q ~ b N l7 Q ~ N ~ N N l7 N b b t7 l7 N Q N p0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 °o °o m o 0 0 °o °o °c °o °o°o °a rv °n o° °o °o °n °o °o °o fO O r O b A Q p b b O N m O N E N l7 O M Q fp b O N b N O CNl A W N n n Q N C') m b N f0 fD l7 n N m M O m ~ m Q (7 m N fp b Q O O ~ n n O m CJ N O ~ 0 0 0 m b n N n Q ~ VI b m m b N fp r t00 O O O O O O O O b m O O O O N N O ~ N b W 0 0 YI O O m Q t7 N Q N N N N t7 m ~-' N N l7 b N N ~ N N M N Q b Cl M N Q N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o b o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o c o 0 0 0 0 0 0'0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o a o 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O b O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N O O O O O O O O V] O O O O O N N O O N b O O O b O O O Q n') N Q N N N N CJ b ~ M N th b N N ~ N N (7 N m b M t7 N Y Cl 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N U] [~ N~ Ct U] ~ f0 a 0 0 0 n p O m t7 m N n 1~ n~ V n M Q I~ r O N O ~ O N N ~ O O M N ~ O N N N N ~ N N O m n m e m io A ~ io o ~~ ~ A~ v~ ~l < io m g r A ~o m o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ o 0 0 0~ o o ~ m o 0 0 e m m b a a a a i a K K K K K K 0 0 0 0 0 0 U U U U U U Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y U' C7 U' U' O U Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y~~ ~' ~~~ 6¢¢¢¢¢¢¢¢¢¢¢¢ Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z m~ m~ m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m¢¢¢¢¢¢¢¢¢¢ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~- F H F ~- ~- F H H H F F F m m m m m m m m m m~ ~~~ ~~ ^ d d 0 0 0 0 d d d d d d Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z 2 2 Z Z Z m¢¢¢¢¢¢¢¢¢ rc rc ¢ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U U U U U U U U U U U U U J J J J J J J J J J J J ~~~~~~~~~~~~~ W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W m K K m K K K m K LL' K K K E E~~~~~ E E~~~~ E~~ 1¢i LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL S S S S S Z O O== O=____ J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W O O O ~ ~ O O ~ D D D O ~ d^ 0 0^ 0 0^ ~ 0^ ~ 0 0 ~ ~ w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL w N 7 Q a O N C O 0 U n m N n n m O CJ O p m N CJ lh N N fp b O OJ m m N f0 b m b O N fD b N N b m O O N 10 n ~ m fp n b b n (O W b fp n l7 [O e y ~ m" a e a a Q Q Q a a e M e Q Q Q Q v o Q Q Q e a a Q ` O N b m N iti T O c m v a Z Z Q 0 m m N d ~ b m q LL C ~' Y > d y LL Y 1- Q LL Y d K O K K W LL LL 1 ¢ a Q 2 K d~ 6~ D v W (~ Y~ Y U X A ` U C7 d n -a ~ -a ~ Y Y Y Y Y Y m 3 J Y Y N LL LL W N m n U Q b N y ~ ~ ~ ~ X X X X n n n n n n U' U' U U ug t 7 m M m n M M m m ~ n n m `~ n m m m m m m m n n M ° ~ ~ ~ m m o m e i n i r e LL M m m ~~ m m m m m m m m m n m in n in in n m~ m m m m m m N ~.' ~ 7 0 a ~ ~~ f a d N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N N N N N N N N I~ P Ct Q m n n T N O N O N N N cl n ~ fo m m N n 0 0 0 0 0 O 1~ m p m N b O O C r Y n ~) O N b m N N r o m o o m o o N m N b~ Y] m O O N m m t+i ~ ~ ~ N N ~ ~ N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N a¢ a a a¢ a a¢ O N O O O O O O O O N O N m O O O O N m I~ m n O O m b r Cl ~- r e- N N ~ ~ O O O O CJ O O O S N O O O O O O O O Ol m O O O O O O O O m OJ O O O O m O O O m f0 'O O O O 1~ O O O m m O O O O OI O O O OI m b O O O 01 b m O W M1 N m N b Q N N O S OI O O O O O O O O 1~ N O m O O O O m m O 1~ m m n r (7 Q O N O b 1~ r m ~ N N ~ ~ m 1~ O O N ^ m N b O O O O m m O O C d r V d ~ ~ N ~ ~ j ~a ~ o j C ~ M i ~ ~ L d ^ Y ~ C ~ C ~ ~~ ` _ Z N 0 ~a ~ ~o c.V d a' m d q C w j A Qm `m N N m N m b N N O N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o b 0 0 0 0 0 0 o a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O m b o 0 0 0 0 0 0 o c o 0 0 N O O O O N N O O N N N N N N N O N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N N N N N N N N 1~ O m < 0 h 1~ A N O N O N N N ~ r (~ r N 10 m f0 f0 1~ X 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 xx o 3 "s rS m N r 01 N i N N N N O O O O ~p m O 0 d m N ~ el m o m N O N r N O O I r N r a ~ m O O m O O N N ~ m N N vi m m N N MI 0 I~ O n N O O N N m N O O O O I O O O O O m O b O O N N O o rv o l n m O O m N m b O N O r m n N 1'! N r m m n N r e l iSi ~ ~ j r '~3€i N a o K t~ O ~ V ~y H m ~ m p z z z z z z z ~ N 4J In y y N y t~ N N t/1 y b b Z Q Q Q Q Q Q Q U U U C7 U' [7 U' f H H F H f ~ E ~ ~ ~ ~ W w J J J J~ O¢¢¢ Q Q Q Q i m 2 2 Z Z Z Z Z Z> ~ w w w w w w w w a ^ 0 0^ 0 0 ~ ~ ~ W W W W W W W W K m LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL f O a ~ O N N V m m m N r N m O O ~ ~ m m m m m I~ n n O _ ~ v c m ~ m m m b m m m a e v>~~ K K~ m 1 A N m d K K K K K m C~ LL LL LL LL LL LL LL N y ~ < m m m b b m m m ~ y C'1 m m m m m M M N U LL m m n in c~ .n m m m c 6 G ~ O i f O z m ¢ d ~ a ai m K F ~ O a h C O a O O U o m d ._ u d to r J ~ m N N V N f m U K ~ W C7 H ~ O m K Z O w U Z Q Z O Q N Z U W d t ~ Q a U W U m Qz rw w Z LL ~ a Q 1 N ¢ U ~ 3 O a N N ~ b e e e a 0 m N < 6 3 Y ~ N u N m M ~ ~ M N f e ~ n m m T °m d a a N 0 F Y P59 r Q U o_ f O LLI O a a ~ a m C O z' M o~ a «~ N r o~ f~ V/ ~ C L E ~ R ~ ca Ego V d ~ N U R y ° C '~ M O l6 d ~ V ~ O ~ c o o E ~ ~ ~ > 0 0 c a° z ~a U m a 0 0 f v m ~~ H i a 0 N O 0 r O M N Q N m n O N N m N m n N ai b q L ~ V a m m mm P~ m 6m 0 0 0 0 z O LL J Q U LL ~ m Y C Z m m z m O ~ z ~ i Q # C m U U m Q °m N ~ ~ o O m d _N f °m a c 8 U fn N T N N b N N V r N O N N m u 0 OI r N N d e e 0 0 m a m C m E a a N L N U O F P60 U o E - a O i ~ rc o a a ~ a m 0 C 0 s' P61 m ~ a rn U ~ a ° > ~~ ~ 8 rc O a ~ a ~ a O m m O N N U N O N m O N O O y Q a N 0 m N I +! q O m m n n tll O N m r n °o n m ~. M r m O O N N r m w a c A a o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 O 0 a; ° 0 ° 0 000 0 0 0 00 0 0 00 o o o o 0 0 n~ m a 0 ~ umi 0 n 0 m 0 m 0 °o 0 o °o °o e °0 o 10~ ' N N N Q ~~ O f Q' N t7 M O O (V a~ b._ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o o m m m m m m O t 0 O 0 O 0 0 00 O 0 00 0 00 O m O O 0 of N of N of m Q o 0 0 0 0 o ~ N N m M u b O O N O N O O r m mm N T V I ~ d O N N N ~ O O O N O P P O C W~ ~ r r m N N N O N d d £ ~ o. o x U L O 16 m 7 r g ~, o Cb ~ ~~ ~~~~~~ ~ UD N N N N N N N N N C O ' Y O Q m f O • r C _ ~ _ _ O D N r 0 V r q r r e- r r ~- '- r ~- ~- \~ ~ ~ ~ ` O N O ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ad o o u~ r r m o 00 0 ~ a ~ b q P m r V P N N N N N N C O O U N` m a d a a C O O Z U U Y Y Y Y [~ U O g Z Z Z Z Y Y~~ S ~ m m m m~~ ~ ~ 0 0 O F F- !- h- m m~~ p ~ LL O ~ D O Z Z Z 2 LL J U O O j 0 ~ U ~ U U U U , E o m i x ~~ o:o:o 00o E 9 A a s a s 5 3 E Y 9 9 ~ w O Z O LL LL LL LL S S S 2 O O J Z O O O ¢ ~ J a ~ m ~ Q Q K K Q Q Q Q Q K K~ K K K ~' Z 4 ~ " U y O N O O 0 0 0 O O O y y L O m 1 O a ~ J J LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL ~ J O ~ Y C ~ ~ m O C c C ~ 6 C ~ b ~ ~ O ~ LL Ol O n O '^ N o d m U m o N m m m m ~ Q °m > y O = m N m d d C m m m O c ° ~ ~ m ~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~ U a ° - E o ~ - m ~ o N O 7 a d O d w n > N m d C « N N C ~ T 9 r O ~ ~ y O o l N j N Q y J~ U y ~ m G Q 0 _ m Z l0 N W O ~ O. t1` O V W U m Y Y Y a A N N J Ol v v a Oo ~ y ~ ~ ~ ~r n C7O w c o0 . _ ~ Y umi N M M n n n n~~ ~ A N ~ O O d U J N U m LL in in m m in n ~n ~n f y f~ ~ P62 o ao r o- m m m N N m m M r o o ac ao m 0 0 ~fl ~O N O l0 ~- < 0I ap W O N r N t0 ~ eD ~ ~ W 0 0 ep N r m ~ Q N O N ~ ~ N N N ~< ~ t"I ~O ~O t0 N i0 r i0 tO M O W Nl W O N N O O O ~- ~O M r O m N ~ J N N ~O ~O O (O (D W O U j «n w » ~» w w w w w w a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o a e o o e o 0 y o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ' « ¢ ¢ ¢ a ¢ g ¢ a ¢ ¢ a ¢ g ¢ a a a a ¢ a I f° z z z z zzz 'z z z z z z z 'z 'z z z z z m r r r m m m o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N t0 ~O N N h 0 0 0 0 0 0 m c o' o' o' o' o' °i ° 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ; L m O m O m O O N N N N N N N N N N N N N O N O O O O _ _ ~ ~ N (O N ~ ~ ~ ~ W W W W I M M M th M M ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ O. W W W _ _ r r~ M ~ N N N a N a N N N N N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 C C C C C O O O O O ~ N N N N N d OI 01 Ol OI OI Q n a a ~ a 0 0 0 0 0 N N y J J J J J ~y c E a o a m m m m m a a a o v a v a o v a v L~ c c c y y y y y c c c c c c c c c c c c ~ 0 ~ J J J LL LL LL ~~~~~ J J J LL LL LL J J J LL LL LL J J J J J J LL LL LL LL LL LL 3 a = d m d m c c c c d w w v w d a~ m m w m m E '~ E ~ ~ ~ u ~ u ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ -~ Y x s Y x s A C d N N N N N N N N N 10 N W N N W ~ m o ~ ~ ~ E E E E E ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O E z d d d a a¢ a a d d v ~ m v w m m w m w ~ C G C _ C C C C C c c C c C C c L j d O O O ~ ~ ~ C ~ O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 C C C ~ ~ ~ it LL ll IL LL ~ ~ ~ ~ `L ~ O W c z a O L C y J O N LL N~ 'O a ~ c c C C c C U1 C c U O m v 2 a j ~ D c a J li LL D ~ Jo li o U J LL O tg J LL~ N O cOi Z` O O LL IL LL 2 LL O LL LL U c Ud N U Q N U a a A IL 7„ te a q LL u c y G ~! Z G d F a ~- a I- LL a E a 2 d v ~ m w u d u u d u _ u m m° ^ v E ~ :4 ` ` ~ ~ m ` ' o.w v a a> w ' y c v y c v v vi o y c w E~~ nin~~~ f Ana` ~n5a` m~ai~-a` O c o 0 0 0 0 a w m m m m m m a `m `m m m m y C LL Yi LL 4i LL VI LL N LL N _ a 3 3 3 3 3 g !^ n E J r ~ N O L O ~ fll N ~ ~ 'C ~ N = N ~ VI V O N O L O Z °c m ~ L ~ 01 U m m a' W lL 0 ~ ~ N W M O _ O ~ ~ U (n W (7 W O ~ ~ d ~ ~ ~ m Z Z 2 ~ ~ ~ O Q d U LL m m a P63 .n N (O u~ o o ~n o m o ~ m o M n ~o ~o ~o W ~O O) O l0 n .- n n 0 O O N O O M N N W ~ O N n 0 0 ~ O n 1A N O D7 ~ O M~ OJ 01 n O O N N W N ~ h O O W N V l0 ~O V W M M< n N O c0 t0 V W N O ~ V O V O W N y ~ m o m w co co m n m m N J ~ N W N N d N N O N U ] w en w .» w vi w v 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 e o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 _I y o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 y :: ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ Q Q ¢ Q Q Q ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ~ Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z m ~ ~ m ° ° ° ~o ~o ° ° o W W ~ o o o O O o o O O M m .~ n M c~ ~n n N n n N d O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 t ~ .. N N N N N N N N N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - U Q N N N ~ ~ N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N a N N W W W~ 0~~ aD ~~~ m S ~~ ''^ W W N C d Ot ¢ u N d y~ IL O ~ V 'O V L 'O U U~ "O a U~~ 'O C 'O D "O a o U~ ~ C C C C C J J J J J C C C C C J J J J J C C C_ C_ C_ C C J J J J C C C C C J J J J J ~~ ~ LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL 0 3 a = v m m m m v~ m w m v 'v v m v w w w d w v v E Y E '~ "z' '~ "~ "~ ~ ~ ~ 't ~ '`~ ~ 'Lc .Ze L`C ~ ~' x x ~ x s A C d N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N IC N N N N N j N O `G `L `G ~ ~ ~ °L ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ rL U E z m m m m m m m m m T v v m m m v T v m w v T O y v a i a i i a c c c t u m c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 c = c ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ e ~ K ~ W v c t c O q C W J 'O "O " 9 t o L` A~ E m a c ~ v o ~ > > 'o u LL LL ~ > c LL c V U d Z ~ o c p op ~ c c J J p ~ ?~ c p op ~ c J v `O c LL' c LL s U LL C IL LL c~ N~ 0 U 0 ' c LL D O N U ' 2' o J x J u a ¢ H LL c x J ~ ¢ ~ LL ~ x J . o u u U ¢ ¢ ~ LL m p u x J o ~ LL ¢ ` ¢ o o ' ¢ a a N LL U N ~. N N« W N¢ N N W a .a v Z '~ u w~ d'v d .a u w w u w d ~.¢ E a i ~ c~ ~ n a~ S «~ ~ n m g~~ m w rn~ u~ o ¢ Ni ~ rn N N d' ¢ ~ d fn ~¢ ~ d . N LL' O¢ U- d fn ~ ~¢ d o c o 0 0 0 v m m m m m m ¢ m LL `m LL `m LL `m LL y c H - w w ~ 2 '° ~ a 3 3 ~ 3 N ~ # vY m m m v m ~ a ¢ ¢` o y o ~ o E E f i^ w ~ m v ~ 5 U m J ° K n E a E f n N O O O O O O ~'I f7 O O O O O O O O N N N N O O O O Z Z Z Z O ^ ~ ^ LL LL LL LL U U U U 0 N O) N N e» d a P64 O I~ T rl n r O~ O O N O l0 (O O r I~ N N N r v O h <O t7 c0 O N N r O) (D O 07 N N M N M m O N J O) ~ O ~ U w w v_I e e e o 0 0 0 0 y O N O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 } 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 j rl Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q d pm Z Z 2 Z 2 Z Z Z m ~m N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 d~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 L l N N N N N N N N d ~ O m ao m eo m m m 7 c7 a m m m rn m m m m Y! c d m a m S d N N u c d E a a a v a a a a ~ L M ~ > j > > > j > j ` LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL 0 3 a E E = a~ m d m~ m w m ' ' Y Y Y Y ' Y S d C m { .~ ~ m m m m m m m m r r j d p ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 2 ~ G U E Z T T T T T T T T O d a m m m m m m d m L j d 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ C ~ ~ a W c c t o d C d J o LL m V N f ~ c J a u LL a ~ ~ U m Z J a o ~>> o LL LL LL O~ ~ 0 c a d s J O^ U C ~ Q LL a a q IL u ~ m d W ip ~- > u a `-° ° ' w E m umi > cm E c a ' m a ~o `~ ° f n v as i aa r o ~m m r o O O ~ N ~O O Cl N N t0 O O r a o (7 N eG O1 N I~ M w o e o o a o O ~ O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Q Q Q Q Q Q Z Z Z Z Z Z o ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N N N N N N ~ ~ ~ t~l M m m rn m m m a a a a a a c c c c c c li li li li li ti m m m m m m Y Y Y Y Y Y T T T T T T m m m m m m c c c c c c ~ ~ ~ ~ c J LL a v a O d O ~ ~ LL a O LL p J O % j d U U m iy o u x ~ m a W Q N m Z o c in a d " m N> E d C cn~o°a-a` O) N ~ O O N O h N ~- O N N O O tO rl n t0 N P O M O 0 V N N l 0 ~ O N ~ O .- N N O O m m m N th ~~~ ~~~~ e o o a o e 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Q Q Q Q Q Q Z Z Z Z Z Z o ~ ~ ~ o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N N N N N M M M M M M n n n n n n a a a a a a c c c c c c li li li li li li x ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ m m m m m m c c c c c c a c ~ c ~ ~ a LL J O LL ~ U ~ j C ~ U 1- W ~ LL G a d 4 ry A Z E u n n m N a 0 m C ~n~~an` ~ eD ~O V ~ O ~ Ip th ~p fV O N O O ID M ep O ~ N T (O W N ~- N O) rl W Q l0 !~ t~] N ? aO t7 N ~ N T e e o o e o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Z Z Z Z Z Z Z r r r r r n r 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N a a a a a a a c c c c c c c IL l1 IL IL lL IL l1 ~ im' ~ ~ im' ~ ~ m m m m m d m C C C C C C C c J U a c v c oco ~ ~ ~ Q c li U LL c~ u c ~ O Q F Q m ~ Z ~_ ~ m w o. N m m ry C~ m ~ c V d O 01 o OI O a a1 o m m Q li li li li y C 41 N VI N 2 m 3 3 3 3 ' a N of d # n # m N y m d ~ m d W m Q Q ~ > J E E 3 ° ~ N ~ j j w O i a C O O U ~ m° E E t0 c 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 ~o 0 0 N N N N O Z O Z O Z O Z ~ O O ~ LL U LL U LL U LL U m a P65 N N O W O OJ O O (D N I~ O r O W O ~] n O ep O N O ~ O 1~ M I~ r W ~ r c~ N r ' d W ~ N ~ O N U ] w w v o o e o o a o e _I y o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ;;; aaaaaaaa ; '^ zzzzzzzz ~ ~ o a r r n r r r r r N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 t N N N N N N N N NI ~ 0 N N N N N N N N ~ N N N N N N N N a c v m a ~ o N c N y ' ' ' ' ' LL O E ~ O O O O 9 9 O ~ S ~ ~ > > 7 7 7 > > 7 0 3 a = LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL E m E a~ m d d m s s m m m x x A C O ~ ~~ m m m m w ~ `m m m j N O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ U E Z T T T T T T T T O y C N W v m m 0 0 0 0 0 a~ m y 0 0 0 S ~ N C C ~ ~ °G ~ ~ G ~ r2 m ~ W ~ C r a O N c m ~ L~ ~ r N LL C L N U U d Z p c D c o O >> c c~ li ~ o p r C a LL p N K j LL U J O U U U' 2' O O H ~' ~ a= Q a a E LL o m 2 :~ u `o N a m a = j w N N N N °~¢¢ i N= N = `3 fn c LL O c o v u m m a ~y c N ~ _ ~ ~ j > ~ a N N m 5 0 a ~ ~ c o `o c m o E m a N O b O O N O Z 0 LL U W O C7 W r WI O O N r r w N O Z O m a O qE U U L U m D U N d Y !. C . y a+ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N C 10 ~ p" 7 C ~ M O 10 d1 ~ ~ ~ ~ a d ~ O ~ Q a Z ~a° U ' "';,=Z UUIy~~ ' __ __ ~ V ~2 > p N r f i c °m .n $ L' »~ N r C H O e a° Y d o _~ m d 1 m d d d d m u C N O r o n ip ~d n p o M w m < v n ip (7 N ~ n O I ~ e ~ ~ O ~ O O m p o m m o n r °o e y o a V °o m of N Y d~ is m ao 0 0 N O n e A N m N N n 0 0 o O 0 0 °o °o 0 0 0 0 o n 0 h N O ~; O O 0 0 0 a m d N d m ~ d y d p - 6 d U d a ~ ~ C E E E a > o ~ U LL e ~ m O M v O o M ~ N A ~ ° m > ao U LL e ~ r h C ~? ID a n c ~ v W t ~ a c m O m f 0 m a E i 0 2 C U ~ C d A ~ b m O ~ T H E ^d' ~ ~ w } drn c v '~ u ~ U Q W P66 ~_ a n ~ a n n O_ f j o ai = 'tr LL d a rc E a 0 N O N O N O 9 O d v a c a 0 0 a m K rc _ Z, m N m e d JD N N N ~ A a 0 a ~ P N O 01 0 0 0 ~ M n ~ o o e n n o o N ~ m N N ~ Oi M O r O r ~O ~M O N O N 0 N m N O A O a v upi o 0 a~ m ry m m ~K ~ o N ~ o° °o ~ o n j y o° O o O e o O O 8 m O N O N O] O A N m m QI O n ry O O O O O J N N O O O A ~ n ~ p b 0 m m m m ]y m m m O H_ N O Y ] O m N M N ~ ~' d C ~ ~ ~ w ~ ~ N ~ d N O 2 °o °O °o °0 0 ~ ~ N a ° ° ° ° ° C f0 C - O ~ o 0 o 0 o o 0 0 o 0 7= ~ M a o ° L ~ h N ~ ~ C ~ C r'i i. C7 L a m d c E c ~ o c ~'a ~ e° a m U o a' o r N o a a m m N C o O r b `mA O o Q m o of 3 N y z y V r z ~ z O '- m LL D Z U O V LL ~ W ~ N K ~ N ~ y 2 rn ~ Q O LL 2 a '^ N Q > "J J > _ m ~ ~ z O ,p v _ Z m W W m D! J ~ LL LL c ~ ~ p c # y J M _ J N c m ~ d U ry 0 w N d ~ ry _ o O o 0 6 7 O o U : m a u ~ m d m Z a w m m E o i Y a E ~ v ~ M H p m ° N m m O U m LL n `n r O n N m N N O a o°, o° 0 Oi u a m m w N N Q °c m H P67 ~ LL n A p F > p ai = d a ~ f a m 0 C a 0 K m m a r r O N O M N y d .. a }' ~ E - m ~ ~ a o 'a Cs ~. z c w ~ r ~ c ~. rn o m m ~ ~ ~ c •~ V C O ~ ~ ~ O Q N ~a v ~ a E m 0 z N C' _O ~6 E' u~ d rc~ d: n t ~~ a 0 N C f d C A m c d n a m E E 0 U d .; U d N c a O U u w m a N m d m n of m a ri m n n m m m O O O 0 0 9 0 E H 9 0 P68 ~ a ~a~ ~ ~^ o ~ u~ g r m o a ¢ a ~ a r? s c m 0 rc STAFF REPORT COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPAR'T'MENT Date: December 21, 2011 RANCHO CUCAMONGA To: Mayor and. Members of the City Council John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director By: Paula Pachon, Management Analyst III Subject: RECEIVE THE COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE RECOMMENDATION In accordance with the City Council's request to become more informed of recreation programs, projects and events, this report is provided to highlight pertinent issues, projects and programs occurring in the Community Services Department. This report is provided to the City Council for informational purposes only. Seniors: The following table highlights some senior activities that took place during November 2011 as well as the total number of registrations for the year for Wellness Pass and Senior Transportation Activity Date Number of Partici ants Billiards Tournament November 4, 2011 14 Bi Band Dance November 12, 2011 97 Thanks ivin Dinner November 18, 2011 206 Senior Billiards Tournament December 2, 2011 16 Holida at Central Park Breakfast December 3, 2011 500 Wellness Pass - A es 60+ Total Re istered Jan -November 2011 - 1,098 Wellness Pass - A es 50-59 Total Re istered Jan -November 2011 - 530 Silver Fox Ex ress Total Re istered Jan -November 2011 - 103 • Uocoming Senior Activities are summarized below: Activit Date Time Pancake Breakfast Fundraiser December 10, 2011 8:00 a.m. Bi Band Dance December 10, 2011 7:00 .m. Senior B-Da December 14, 2011 11:00 a.m. Senior Holida Part December 15, 2011 9:00 a.m. Senior Holida Dance Part December 20, 2011 1:00 .m. Senior Billiards Tournament Janua 6, 2011 1:00 .m. P69 • It is anticipated that the Senior Advisory Committee will hold a regular meeting on Monday, January 23, 2012, at 9:00 a.m. at the James L. Brulte Senior Center. P70 RECEIVE THE COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE DECEMBER 21.2011 PAGE2 Participation in the Senior Nutrition Program for the month of November 2011 is summarized in the table below. Week Date Partici ants 1 11/1 throw h 11/4/2011 789 2 11/7 throw h 11/10/2011 807 3 11/14throu h 11/18/2011 1,023 4 11/21 throw h 11/23/2011 635 5 11/28 throw h 11/30/2011 576 Total meals served for the month of November, 2011: 3,830 Senior Services: The table below summarizes participation in Senior Services activities for the month of November 2011: Pro ram Number of Partici ants Blood Pressure Screenin 38 Resource Libra 200 Bereavement Su ort 10 Alzheimer's Su ort 8 Elder Law Private Counselin 15 HICAP 3 Dr. Cohen - "The Doctor is In" 12 Peo le with Arthritis Can Exercise 289 Sit and Be Fit 399 Special Needs Programs: • The table below highlights Special Needs activities that took place during November 2011: Activity Start Date Number of Partici ants Martial Arts/Kun Fu - Be innin November 7, 2011 1 Martial Arts/Kun Fu -Intermediate November 7, 2011 4 Special Needs Support Group and Young Adult Social November 17, 2011 25 Friday Night Fun Club -Family Game Night and Potluck November 18, 2011 11 Upcoming Special Needs activities are summarized below: Activit Date Time Mixed Martial Arts December 3, 2011 11:45 a.m. - 12:45 .m. Special Needs Support Group and Young Adult Social December 15, 2011 6:30 - 8:30 p.m. Friday Night Fun Club - "Jingle Jamboree" Dance December 16, 2011 5:30 - 7:30 p.m. Tech Junction: P71 RECEIVE THE COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE DECEMBER 21, 2011 PAGE 3 • The table below summarizes participation in Tech Junction activities for the month of November 2011: Senior Computer Classes Date Number of Partici ants Intro to Microsoft Excel November 2, 7, 9 5 Intro to Windows and PCs November 14, 16, 21 15 Intro to PowerPoint November 15, 17, 22 8 Public Computer Classes Date Number of Partici ants Intro to Excel Adult November 22, 2011 2 Intro to Typing, Word and Power Point Youth November 22, 2011 2 Tech Junction Date Number of Partici ants Dro -In Use November 2011 571 Senior Classes November 2011 121 Public Classes November 2011 100 Total Uses/Users November 2011 792 • Upcoming Computer Class activities are summarized below Senior Com uter Classes Date Intro to Surfin the Internet December 5, 7, 12, 14 Intro to T in December 13, 15, 20, 22 Public Com uter Classes Start Date E-ba Worksho December 10, 2011 Trips and Tours: The following Trips and Tours took place during the reporting period: Trip Date Number of Partici ants Carlsbad Street Villa a Faire November 6, 2011 96 Palm S rin s Follies November 16, 2011 46 • Upcoming Trips and Tours are summarized below: Tri Date Ronald Rea an - An American Christmas December 1, 2011 Santa Fe Holida December 4, 2011 Murder M ste at the Reef December 13, 2011 Harborside Restaurant and Cruise of Li hts December 1 S, 2011 San Antonio Wine and Griffith Observato Janua 6, 2012 Human Services -Commodities Date Number of Families Served Number of Individuals Served Monda ,November 7, 2011 432 831 P72 RECEIVE THE COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE DECEMBER 21, 2011 Facilities: The table below illustrates the number of rentals/bookings and attendance figures for our community facilities during the month of November 2011: PAGE4 Facility Rentals Number of Rentals/ Rental Building Attendance Bookin s Attendance James L. Brulte Senior Center 36 / 98 4,940 21,334 Goldy S. Lewis Community 64 / 175 10,739 14,973 Center Youth: The table below summaries Youth Program Attendance for the month of November. Program Classes /Sites Registrants /Attendance Pla school 45 / 5 717 / 4,565 Pum kin Patch Field Tri 45 / 5 857 Grand arents Da 45 / 5 500 Lewis Partnership Kids Club @ Del Mar, & Terra Vista Apartments 2 / 2 472 Teens: • The table below summarizes Teen Program Attendance for the month of November. Pro ram/Activit Attendance /Partici ation Teen Center 320 Partici ants; 240 Partici ants TRAC Snack Bar 15 Volunteers TRAC Leadershi Meetin 29 Volunteers TRAC Meetin 25 Volunteers Etiwanda Historical Societ 7 Volunteers; 800 S ectators TRAC Thanks ivin Baskets 5 Volunteers; 200 S ectators TRAC Founders Parade 6 Volunteers; 1,500 S ectators Skate Park 2700 Partici ants; 1,500 S ectators "Fall Out" Dance 304 Partici ants Recreation Contract Classes -Fall Quarter: Number of Class Offerings Number of Class Sites Number of Re istrants 448 22 238 Facilities: The table below illustrates the number of rentals/bookings and attendance figures for our community facilities during the month of November. Facility Rentals Number of Rentals /Bookings Rental Attendance Building Attendance Lions Center East 19 / 62 316 2,006 Lions Center West 16 / 106 501 1,688 P73 RECEIVE THE COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE DECEMBER 21.2011 RC Family Resource Center- Human Services: PAGE 5 • The table below summarizes Center ProgramslWorkshops Attendance for the month of November. Pro ram/Worksho Attendance /Partici ation AI -Anon/A-la Teen 118 Alcohol Anon mous 91 Counselin 48 Communit Yard Sale 507 Communit Closet Giveawa 181 De artment of Children Services 52 De ressive Bi olar Su ort 48 Famil Fun Ni ht 63 Health Care Benefits for All 15 Lessons Learned Tutorin 100 House of Ruth Domestic Violence Class 43 Leadin Ladies -Rainbow Readin Club 32 Le al Aid Societ -Free referrals 42 Li hthouse Learnin Center 37 Math Tutorin 120 National MS Societ 40 Parentin Classes Para Los Ninos 19 Men's Life Grou 51 RC Famil Resource Center Staff Meetin 9 South Coast Communit Services 160 Women on the Move 60 Zumba Class 120 Health RC Kids Fun on the Run 1,140 TOTAL 3,096 • The table below summarizes the number of Clients Served by Each Agencv that is Housed at the Resource Center for the month of November. A encies Housed at Resource Center Number of Clients Served Touch Ministries 423 Beaut for Ashes 48 House of Ruth 71 Communit Action Partnershi 0 Li ht House Learnin Center 37 Leadin Ladies 32 Para Los Nino's 31 TOTAL 627 Facilities: • The table below illustrates the number of rentals and attendance figures for our community facilities during the month of November. Facility Rentals Number of Rentals Rental Attendance Building Attendance RC Famil Resource Center 6 576 4,299 P74 RECEIVE THE COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE DECEMBER 21.2011 Volunteers: PAGE 6 The table below summarizes the Community Services Department's volunteer usage for the month of October 2011. October 2010 October 2011 Division Number of Volunteers Number of Hours Dollar Value* Number of Volunteers Number of Hours Dollar Value* Administration 5 15 $349 5 15 $349 Senior Services 134 1,836 $42,760 148 2,151 $50,097 Human Services 60 214 $4,984 71 259 $6,032 S orts 130 1,252 $29,259 138 736 $17,141 S ecial Events - - $0 - - $0 Performing Arts 79 1,171 $27,273 68 881 $20,518 Teens 16 167 $3,889 18 98 $2,282 Youth Pro rams 63 358 $8,338 96 708 $16,489 Totals 487 5,013 $116,753 544 4,848 $112,910 'tiasetl on ~z3.Zy/nr -Mate average as tlerermrnetl oy me caurorma moepenaenr senor. Youth Sports: The table below summarizes Youth Sports Activities for the November reporting period. Activity Number of Partici ants Participant A e/Gender Number of Teams Pee Wee Fall Basketball 244 3-5 bo s & irls 24 Northtown Build -A-Beat Drums 5 5-17 boys & girls N/A Northtown BaIIeUJazz 2 6-9 bo s & irls N/A Northtown Ballet/Ta 7 3-6 bo s & irls N/A Northtown Hi -Ho 5 5-14 bo s & irls N/A CASA Cookin 26 9-U bo & irls N/A Northtown Combined Martial Science 3 4-17 boys & girls N/A Northtown Youth Soccer 21 6-14 bo s & iris N/A Northtown Art 3 5-14 bo s & irls N/A Youth Fla Football 215 6-14 bo s & irls 18 Youth Volle ball 315 9-17 irls 30 RC Family Sports Center: The table on the following page provides drop-in/open plav and rental participation at the Center for the reporting period. P75 RECEIVE THE COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE DECEMBER 21.2011 Activity Number of Partici ants Adult Basketball 450 Youth Basketball 548 Adult Rac uetball 203 Youth Rac uetball 32 Adult Volle ball 11 Youth Volle ball 98 Adult Walle ball 6 Youth Walle ball 35 Jazzercise 1240 Rentals 170 Youth Basketball Practices 0 Youth Volle ball Practices 65 Youth Judo 175 Youth G mnastics 135 Adult Sports: The table below summarizes adult sport activities for the reporting period. PAGE 7 Activity Number of Partici ants Number of Teams Participant Gender Softball 2,210 162 Males & Females Adult Basketball 132 11 Males Rac uetball 6 NA Males & Females Tennis 11 NA Males & Females Soccer 345 17 Males & Females Monda Ni ht Dro -In 40 N/A Males & Females There were two Adult Softball Tournaments during the month of November at the Epicenter. Cultural and Performing Arts: The table below summarizes Theatre Arts Academy classes during the reporting period. Activity Participants /Attendance Showsto ers Musical Theatre 57 Actin in Performance Teens 65 Broadwa Babies 53 Sin in for a lifetime 55 RC Holida Choir 30 Youth Theatre 178 Comed Im rov 38 Wee Sin 10 Sin Like an Idol 20 TOTAL 506 P76 RECEIVE THE COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE DECEMBER 21, 2011 PAGE 8 • Community Theatre rehearsals/auditions included the following during the reporting period: Activit Partici ants/Attendance A Christmas Carol 480 TOTAL 480 Other rehearsals/auditions/programs/previews included the following during the reporting period. Activity Participants/Attendance Slee in Beaut Auditions 30 TOTAL 30 • Court Yard Programs included the following during the reporting period. Date Activit Attendance Saturday, 11-5-2011 Hello Kitty Day (Library) 100 Friday, 11-18-2011 RC Community Concert 200 TOTAL 100 Rental Activities: • The table below and on the following page summarizes rental activities in Celebration Hall and Imagination Courtyard at the Cultural Center for the reporting period. Celebration.Hall, Cou ard, and Lobb Rental Events Date Event Attendance Wednesday, 11-2-2011 Riverside Inyo Mano San Bernardino- Advancement Via Individual Determination Coordinator Workshop - Celebration Hall 150 Friday, 11-4-2011 Fundraiser Reception -Celebration Hall 100 Saturday, 11-5-2011 Ambassador Programs -Celebration Hall 800 Tuesda , 11-8-2011 Nat'l Assoc of Hispanic Real Estate Professionals -Celebration Hall 40 hursda , 11-9-2011 Riverside Inyo Mano San Bernardino- Advancement Via Individual Determination Coordinator Workshop - Celebration Hall 50 Frida , 11-18-2011 West Coast Universit -Celebration Hall 300 Saturda , 11-26-2011 Munoz Weddin -Celebration Hall 150 TOTAL 1,690 CSD Events Date ~ Event /Location Attendance Saturda , 11-19-2011 Silver Fox Follies -Playhouse 258 TOTAL 258 P77 RECEIVE THE COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE DECEMBER 21, 2011 Libra Events Date Event Attendance Thursda , 11-3-2011 Libra Tours -Celebration Hall 80 Thursda , 11-3-2011 Teen Pro ram -Celebration Hall 20 Frida , 11-4-2011 Libra Meetin -Celebration Hall 25 Saturda , 11-5-2011 Hello Kitt Da -Courtyard 100 Monda , 11-7-2011 California Library Assoc. Rehearsal - Celebration Hall 20 Wednesda , 11-16-2011 Trainin Worksho -Celebration Hall 45 TOTAL 272 Cit Celebration Hall Events Date Event Attendance Tuesday, 11-8-2011 Register of Voters -Celebration Hall 100 TOTAL 100 Membershi Events Date Event Attendance Friday, 11-18-2011 Club M Tree Lighting, Balcony 19 TOTAL 19 Lewis Family Playhouse: PncE9 • During the reporting period, the Lewis Family Playhouse was host to a wide variety of productions, community programs and private rentals. The table below reflects number of tickets sold for various performances during the reporting period. It does not reflect actual patrons in attendance: Lewis Famil Pla house Professional) Presented Productions NUMBER Tickets OF SHOW DATE Distributed EVENTS Ta Kids 11-12-2011 406 1 Lewis Famil Pla house Communit Theatre I Broadwa the Gardens Productions NUMBER Tickets OF SHOW DATE Distributed EVENTS Rumors 11-4; 11-5; and 11-6-2011 789 3 Chown Martial Arts 11-13-2011 235 1 Lewis Famil Pla house Libra and Other Ci Events NUMBER Tickets OF SHOW DATE Redeemed EVENTS Silver Fox Follies (Community Services Department -James L. 11-19-2011 258 1 Brulte Senior Center) P78 RECEIVE THE COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE DECEMBER 21, 2011 Public Lobby PAGE 10 • The Lobby to the Victoria Gardens Cultural Center is open to the public six days a week. During the reporting period, local residents visited the public areas. Public Lobby Total: 508 Parks: The table below and on the following page provides usage information for Dark picnic shelters and special use facilities for the month of October 2011. Park/Shelter Attendance Number of Rentals Be I Park Co ote Can on Da Creek 140 3 Etiwanda Creek Garcia Park 65 2 Herita a 268 8 Hermosa Milliken 45 2 Mountain View 74 2 Red Hill 452 8 m hitheatre at Red Hill ictoria Arbors 125 2 TOTAL 1,169 27 Equestrian Center Participants: 70' S ectators: 60 4 'Equestrian participants include drop-in use. Park monitors continue to keep daily reports of activities in our parks, often helping out residents in need of assistance. Equestrian Center: Staff continues to meet quarterly with users of the Equestrian Center (Alta Loma Riding Club, Rancho Rebels 4-H, Rising Stars of Equestrian Therapy and Rancho Cucamonga Citizen Mounted Patrol) to address maintenance needs and programming. Special Events: The table below lists free, family-friendly events that took place during the reporting period. Event Date /Time Location Attendance Founders Festival Community Saturday, November 12, Victoria Gardens 3,000 -. Parade 2011 / 9:30 am attendees; (Celebration festivities in the 2,100 - Courtyard cancelled due to weather) artici ants P79 RECEIVE THE COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE DECEMBER 21, 2011 Epicenter: PAGE 11 • There were no events/activities at the Epicenter during the month of November. The facility was down for maintenance and repairs. Park and Recreation Commission: • The Park and Recreation Commission met on November 17, 2011. The following items were discussed/acted upon at this meeting: - Review of City Council Updates. - Approval of Minutes of the October 20`" Commission Meeting. - Update and establishment of future agenda items for the Senior Advisory Committee. - Update and establishment of future agenda items for the Sports Advisory Committee. - Review and approval of the Field Allocation Proposal for youth sports groups for spring/summer season. - Overview of the potential future projects and associated funding issues with the Park Development Vision Plan. - Semi-annual update on Community Services Department marketing efforts. - Consideration of a Commissioner's attendance at the 2011 California and Pacific Southwest Recreation and Park Training Conference to be held March 20-23, 2011, in Long Beach. - Consideration and discussion regarding waiver of December 15, 2011, Park and Recreation Commission meeting. - Oral Reports from the Trails Advisory, Sports Advisory, Senior Advisory and Armed ForcesNeterans Reflection Area Committees. - Update on a request by resident to provide a "peace pole" at Central Park. - Identification of items for future meetings. - Commission communication. Rancho Cucamonga Community 8~ Arts Foundation: • The Foundation's $1,000.000 Golf Tournament was held on Monday, November 14, 2011, at Red Hill Country Club. The Foundation is also sponsoring their 2nd annual Holiday for the Arts Campaign through the end of the year. This Campaign is a web-based fundraising campaign aimed at garnering community donations to support the arts at the Lewis Family Playhouse. Community Services Director I:ICOMMSERVICouncilBBoardslCityCouncillStaNReports120111CSDUpdate.12.21.11. doc STAFF REPORT CITI' nI.-~N~GER'ti OFFICE Date: December 13, 2011 To: Mayor and Members of the City Council John Gillison, City Manager From: Fabian Villenas, Principal Management Analyst Subject: Adoption of 2012 Legislative Priorities It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached 2012 Legislative Priorities. BACKGROUND P80 RANCHO CUCAMONGA Each year, there are dozens of bills introduced into the State Legislature and U.S Congress that directly impact the operations of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Often, the City needs to take a position on a particular piece of legislation that will have an impact on the City. City staff carefully monitors pending state and federal legislation, and once a position is adopted, staff works closely with the City Council to advocate on behalf of the City to members of the State Legislature, Governor, and/or members of Congress. The 2011 Legislative Priorities adopted last year directed the City of Rancho Cucamonga's Legislative Program through the incorporation of key strategic actions that include the communication of legislative positions on proposed Federal, State, and County legislation, measures, initiatives, and governmental regulations and the pursuit of Federal, State, and County funding through earmarks, grants, and discretionary funding for City projects, services, and programs. The attached 2012 Legislative Priorities builds upon this foundation and has been updated to reflect issues that are anticipated to continue or emerge in 2012. Additions and changes are highlighted in red. The 2012 Legislative Priorities serves as both an outline and reference guide for legislative positions and objectives that shape the actions of both City Council and staff. It is the foundation of a focused advocacy strategy with the primary objective of adopting official City positions on clearly stated legislative issues at the start of the legislative session. It encourages collaboration with the League of California Cities and other local cities and organizations in supporting the City's diverse legislative interests. The City of Rancho Cucamonga will not address matters that are not pertinent to local government services or duties, such as socially divisive, partisan, or international affairs. The Legislative Priorities is formulated and will be maintained annually using the goals and objectives of the City Council, a review of legislative priorities from the League of California Cities, research of current law and pending legislation, as well as input from the City Council, City departments, local legislative staff, and the City's legislative advocates. Key additions to the 2012 Legislative Priorities include: P81 ADOPTION OI~ 2012 LIiG1SLATIA'E PRIORTP773S llLCrnfsra 13, 2017 PAGP 2 • In connection with the League of California Cities 2012 Goals, an introductory statement affirming the City's commitment to promoting local control. • Support legislation that, in the event the status of redevelopment agencies changes, provides for proper credit for cities that provide pass-thru payments to local schools. • Support efforts to sufficiently fund Public Safety Realignment efforts so that local governments can adequately manage the shifting of inmates from state prisons to local jails. • Support efforts to reverse the decline of Ontario International Airport, including gaining regional control of the Airport. • Protect Highway User Tax Account (HUTA) funding that cities receive for street maintenance and improvements. • Advocate for Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility's inclusion in the Hoover Power Allocation Act of 2011 in order to have access to the Dam's power allocation. If the past several years are any indication, the 2012 State Legislative Session will be another difficult year for local cities as we play defense on a number of policy and funding issues. The City of Rancho Cucamonga is poised to closely monitor legislative issues of municipal concern and be actively involved iri the legislative process. Respectfully Submitted, 1 ~r ~v Fabian A. Villenas Principal Management Analyst City Manager's Office Attachment: 2012 Legislative Priorities 2012 Legislative Priorities LEGISLATIVE PRIORITIES PURPOSE STATEMENT The 2012 Legislative Priorities provides a framework for the City of Rancho Cucamonga's legislative Program. Adopted annually, the City's Legislative Priorities serves as a reference guide for legislative positions and objectives that provide direction for the City Council and staff throughout the year. The legislative Priorities is the foundation of a focused advocacy strategy. The primary objective of the Legislative Priorities is for the City Council to adopt official City positions on clearly stated legislative issues at the start of the legislative session. By doing this, the legislative approval process is streamlined by receiving clear direction at the beginning of the legislative session from the City Council on pertinent legislative issues. The Legislative Priorities is developed and maintained using the goals and objectives of the City Council, a review of legislative priorities from the League of California Cities, League's Inland Empire Division, input from City Council and Staff, research of current law and pending legislation, as well as discussions with local legislative staff and the City's legislative advocates. Federal and state legislative proposals and policies consistent with the Legislative Priorities may be supported by the City. Those policies or proposals inconsistent with this agenda may be opposed by the City. For proposed legislation, either consistent with the City's Legislative Priorities or consistent with legislative positions the City has taken in the past, City staff shall be authorized to prepare position letters for the Mayor's signature. Items not addressed in the City's Legislative Priorities may require further Council direction. Legislative priorities may only address issues directly relevant to or impacting the provision of municipal services. Generally, the City will not address matters that are not pertinent to the City's local government services such as social or international issues. City departments are encouraged to monitor and be knowledgeable of any legislative issues related to their discipline. However, any requests for the City to take positions on a legislative matter must be directed to the City Manager's Office. City departments may not take positions on legislative issues without City Manager's Office review and approval. 1115(x1 Gr7c Center Dr. • P.O Kos to i7 • Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 • 'T'el 909 477-271111 • Fas 909 477-2849 • www.a.rancho-cucamongaca.us Y 2012 Legislative Priorities Page 2 ANCHC~ AMON(7A The Legislative Program Goals and Strategies/Actions are outlined below. Program Goals: ^ Advocate the City's legislative interests at the Federal, State and County levels. ^ Inform and provide information to our Legislators, City Council, and Staff on the legislative process and key issues and legislation that could have a potential impact on the City. ^ Serve as an active participant with other local governments, the League of California Cities, regional agencies such as SANBAG, SCAG, SCAQMD, OmniTrans, and local professional organizations on legislative/regulatory issues that are important to the City and our Region. ^ Seek grant and funding assistance for City projects, services, and programs to enhance services for our community. Strategies/Actions: Communicate legislative positions on proposed Federal, State, and County legislation, measures, initiatives, and governmental regulations. A. Work with city departments and our legislative advocates to develop positions on proposed Federal and State legislative measures. B. Staff will review the positions and analysis done by the League of California Cities, our legislative advocates' feedback, and other local government/professional associations in formulating our positions. C. The City will take positions only on proposals that clearly impact our City or are a threat to local control. D. Actively track key bills through the legislative process, utilizing the City's advocacy services, various Legislative web sites, and government/professional associations. E. Communicate the City's position to our Federal, State, and County Legislators, bill author(s), committees, and Legislature, through correspondence, testimony, and in-person meetings. F. Work cooperatively with other Cities, associations, and the League of California Cities on advocating our legislative positions. G. As necessary, participate in the drafting and amending of proposed Federal and State measures that have the potential to significantly impact the City. H. Meet with Legislators and their representatives, as well as other Federal, State, and County government officials on a regular basis, to discuss local government issues, proposed legislation, requests for funding assistance, and City programs and services. II. Seek Federal, State, and County funding through earmarks, grants, and other discretionary funding for City projects, services, and programs. a. Annually identify City projects for potential submittal for Federal earmark consideration. Develop a submittal packet for Legislators that provides information and need for the projects. b. Provide information to City departments on potential grant funding opportunities and recognition programs. c. Advocate and request letters of support for City projects and grant applications or other resources that are being considered for Federal, State, and County funding. P83 ~ _- 2012 Legislative Priorities R:,~~ tu, Page 3 CIK:AT1OtiG:1 III. Work closely with the League of California Cities, our legislative advocates, and other cities and organizations in advocating for City's Federal, State, and County legislative interests. a. Actively participate in the League of California Cities' Inland Empire Division activities. b. Participate in League of California Cities, including active involvement in League Policy Committees and other organization briefings and activities in order to stay updated on trends, upcoming initiatives, and pending legislation. c. Interact with other cities on issues of mutual concern or impact. d. Interact with regional groups that are involved with legislative programs (e.g., Chamber of Commerce, SANBAG, CalTrans, CVWD, SCAG, SCAQMD, etc.) e. Review requests from other governmental and regional organizations to consider supporting their legislative positions and/or funding requests. IV. Share information with the City Council, City staff, and the community on legislative issues. a. Work closely with department heads and staff to determine their legislative priorities and funding needs for the upcoming legislative session. b. Provide updates on legislative issues to the Council and departments throughout the year. c. Educate and involve the community in the City's advocacy efforts on legislative issues and P84 State/Federal funding requests. 2012 Legislative Priorities Page 4 R~~< rig, C,IICAA((1N(:.4 2012 LEGISLATIVE PRIORITIES - The City of Rancho Cucamonga strongly promotes local control for cities and will support or oppose legislation and proposed constitu[ional amendments based on whether they advance maximum local control by city governments over ciiv revenues, land use, redevelopment and other municipo! activities. STATE ADMINISTRATIVE AND EMPLOYMENT RELATED - Support efforts to enact workers' compensation reforms that lower employers' costs while still protecting workers. - Oppose legislation or regulations that would unreasonably increase employer medical costs for workers' compensation. - Oppose legislation which would increase employer liability for unemployment compensation, or which would reduce local discretion to manage this risk. - Support local government efforts to establish succession planning and mentoring programs. - Support reasonable limitations on tort liability, including tort immunities for public entities for unauthorized use of public property. - Support limitations on the joint and separate liability of governmental agencies to a liability equal to their percentage of their wrongdoing. - Oppose legislative efforts to impose binding arbitration that would remove local government authority on matters of local interest. Specifically, support all legislative and legal efforts to overturn any legislation that implements binding arbitration on local government. - Support funding for a comprehensive approach to expanding and enhancing arts programs in the community. - Support legislation that provides incentives or grant opportunities for community improvements. - Support legislation that provides funding for transportation services, e~eciolly ~ for senior citizens. - Support legislation that provides funding and resources for local governments to implement Healthy Cities programs and policies aimed at reducing obesity, childhood obesity, high rates of diabetes, heart disease, and other health conditions. P85 - Support legislative efforts to increase opportunities for community-wide citizen volunteer R~~( t~(~ cUCAMONG.4 programs. 2012 Legislative Priorities Page 5 - Support funding for a coordinated and comprehensive approach to address the needs of youth in the community. - Oppose legislation that imposes undue hardship on local agencies to implement environmental regulations. - Support legislation that provides resources and funding to local governments for the implementation of SB 375. - Support streamlined environmental processing for federal regulatory permits issued by Caltrans and various other state and federal agencies for the purpose of expediting public infrastructure developments. - Support legislation to provide changes to AB 939 that will streamline its provisions and assist in compliance, placing more emphasis on implementation of waste diversion programs and less on strict mathematical accounting. - Support financial incentives for water reuse and legislation that encourages the treatment of municipal wastewater for non-potable reuse and promote the development of reasonable regulations to encourage and maximize the responsible use of reclaimed water as an alternative to California's fresh water supply. - Oppose air quality legislation that restricts the land use authority of cities. HOUSING. LAND USE PLANNING AND REDEVELOPMENT - Should changes in the status of redevelopment agencies occur, support legislation that provides proper credit for cities that provide pass-thru payments to local schools. - Oppose legislation that imposes a mandatory cap on local parking standards in transit intensive areas. - Support legislation that strengthens the concept of local control/local home rule for local decision making on land use and zoning matters. - Support legislation that preserves municipal authority over the public right-of-way including fair and reasonable compensation for use of the right-of-way. - Support a streamlined right-of-way acquisition process. - Oppose any efforts to eliminate redevelopment agencies. P86 - Oppose efforts by any regulatory commission from promulgating rules and regulations that infringe on local land use decisions and management of the public right-of-way. 2012 Legislative Priorities Page b tiR.,tit li~~ ~,11CAMl1tiGA. - Oppose additional affordable housing production mandates without necessary funding to support said housing mandate. - Support continuing flexibility in the use of redevelopment authority, and oppose limiting the authority or increasing the liability of redevelopment agencies. - Support legislation that enhances redevelopment agencies' ability to promote economic development and job creation. - Support efforts that increase the City's ability to reasonably oversee the location of community care facilities. - Support legislation that provides funding for the identification, acquisition, maintenance and restoration of historic sites and structures. - Support efforts to establish permonen[ sufficient Public Safety Realignment funding and an equitable county allocation formula in order for local government to odeguately manage the shifting of inmates from stole prisons to local tails. - Support legislation that provides funding support for disaster preparedness, earthquake preparedness, Homeland Security, hazardous material response, State COPS program, booking fee reimbursement and other local law enforcement activities. - Support efforts that strengthen local law enforcement's ability to prevent and fight crime. - Support legislation that minimizes alcohol-related criminal behavior and underage drinking. - Oppose legislation that alters distribution of revenues from traffic and parking violations, resulting in lower revenue for local governments. - Oppose legislation that would impede local law enforcement from addressing crime problems and recovering costs resulting from a crime committed by the guilty party. - Support legislation that limits the placement of sex offender and parolee homes within the City limits. - Support statewide efforts to coordinate disaster preparedness programs in local jurisdictions and support guidelines to identify the strengths and weaknesses of local preparedness efforts. - Support and promote programs that enhance the benefits of mutual aid agreements between local governments. - Support increased authority and resources devoted to cities for abatement of graffiti and other acts of public vandalism. P87 - Support additional funding in order for local agencies to recoup the costs associated with fire P88 ~L 2012 Legislative Priorities ~R:,~~ E~~, Page 7 ~,1'('AA1(1\(:q safety in the community. - Support legislation which increases home rule in adopting Fire and Life Safety Codes. - Oppose legislation that restricts local authority jurisdiction over the enforcement of fire and life safety regulations. - Support efforts which strengthen local fire and life safety services. - Support legislation that provides resources and funding opportunities related to wildfire prevention and wildfire response. - Support regional efforts to improve interoperability of voice and data communications equipment. - Support legislation that provides local law enforcement agencies authority to recover any costs associated with complying with any federal, state or court-ordered licensing, registration and testing requirements. - Support efforts to promote and fund programs to combat pet overpopulation, increase pet adoptions and spay/neuter programs and educate citizens on the dangers and nuisance of roaming, uncontrolled animals and other animal control issues that risk public health and safety and quality of life. . (Move to another section) (Move to another section) ., . (Move to another section) REVENUE AND TAXATION - Oppose any legislation that would make local agencies more dependent on the State for financial stability and policy direction. - Oppose legislation that would impose State mandated costs for which there is no guarantee of local reimbursement or offsetting benefits. - Support efforts to protect local government revenue sources and the provisions of Proposition 1A. Support legislation/initiatives that ensure that all local funding sources remain a dedicated revenue source for local governments. - Oppose any legislation that would pre-empt or reduce local discretion over locally-imposed taxes. ti 2012 Legislative Priorities Page 8 R.,~~ ~~„ cIK:AM(lti~:~ - Support full cost reimbursement to the City for all federal, state and county-mandated programs. - Oppose any efforts by the state legislature to take or divert local agency Redevelopment Funds as a revenue source to offset the state budget deficit. - Oppose legislative and administrative efforts by online travel companies to circumvent remittance of transient occupancy taxes to local governments from hotel reservations purchased using the Internet. - Support efforts to reverse the decline of Ontario lniernational Airport including gaining regional control of the Airport. - Oppose efforts to redirect, eliminate, or reduce amount of Highway User Tax Account (HUTA) that cities receive for street maintenance and improvements. - Support legislation or policy that provides funding to local governments for local transportation and water, sewer and storm sewer system projects. - 5upport legislation that provides funding and resources for alternative fuel vehicles for replacement of municipal fleet equipment. - Support efforts to provide adequate charging station infrastructure for emerging electric vehicle technology. - Support legislation that provides funding and resources for retrofitting municipal buildings to increase energy efficiency. - Support efforts for continuing and increasing funding sources for street maintenance projects and transportation improvements. - Support legislation that would lift the minimum requirement of payment of prevailing wages on municipal Public Works projects. - Oppose any legislotion that diminishes or does not assure local franchise fees for all utilities' use of City right-of-wav. - Support legislation that improves the availabiliri of renewable energv and increases energv efficiency programs. P89 - Oppose legislation that seeks to lessen the City's abiliri to enforce contractual language agreed to and contained within existing franchise documents. R~~,~ ~~~ (;uranu~ticn FEDERAL 2012 Legislative Priorities Page 9 - Advocate for the inclusion of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility in the Hoover Power Allocation Act of 2011 provision that provides for 5 percent of existing power aNocation to be apportioned to new entities. - Support funding for the Nations! Endowment of Arts for the purpose of expanding and enhoncing arts programs in the community. - Support the reauthorization of SAFETEA-LU surface transportation bill in order to provide critical funding for highways, highway safety and public transportation. - Support streamlined environmental processing for federal regulatory permits issued by the US Army Corp of Engineers, US Fish & Wildlife Service, Federal Highway Administration and various other state and federal agencies for the purpose of expediting public infrastructure projects. - Support continued funding for the Energy Efficiency Block Grant Program in order to provide resources directly to local governments for programs that improve energy efficiency, develop and implement energy conservation programs, and promote and develop alternative and renewable energy sources. - Support efforts to streamline or eliminate the Medicare Secondary Payer process. - Oppose legislative or administrative actions that prohibit or hinder local government's ability to implement Property Assessed Clean Energy (PACE) programs. - Support legislation to include consideration of the economic impacts of proposed species listings, as well as support the delisting of species no longer threatened or endangered. - Support collecting and remitting state and local sales taxes to the state and city in which the purchaser is residing, (e.g., purchases made over the Internet; by mail order; by catalog, etc.). - Support local/regional control and administration of federal programs and strategic placement of federal personnel to ensure expedited decision-making. - Oppose legislation and the promulgation of rules and regulations that allow any regulatory agency to encroach on, or supersede, local authority, including, but not limited to, the City's right to franchise for the right to operate in the public right-of-way. - Oppose funding cuts to Community Development Block Grant (CDBG), HOME program and Section 8 Housing funds. Advocate for a more streamlined application process and for greater flexibility of local appropriation and use of monies. P90 - Support legislation to modify inappropriate sections of the Federal Fair Labor Standards Act (ELBA) as it relates to regulating public sector employment. STAFF REPORT ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT RANCHO Date: December 21, 2011 CUCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Mark A. Steuer, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer By: Romeo M. David, Associate Engineer ~n'L~ Shelley Hayes, Assistant Engineer Subject: ACCEPT THE BIDS RECEIVED AND AWARD AND AUTHORIZE THE EXECUTION OF THE CONTRACT IN THE AMOUNT OF $51,755.60, TO THE LOWEST RESPONSIVE BIDDER, FS CONSTRUCTION, AND AUTHORIZE THE EXPENDITURE OF A 10% CONTINGENCY IN THE AMOUNT OF $5,175.56, FOR THE ETIWANDA AVENUE AND 4T" STREET SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS TO BE FUNDED FROM ACCOUNT NOS. 11333035650/1717133-0, 18820002314 AND 1 1 3930356 50/1 7801 39-0 RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council accept the bids received and award and authorize the execution of the contract in the amount of $51,755.60, to the lowest responsive bidder, FS Construction, and authorize the expenditure of a 10% contingency in the amount of $5,175.56, for the Etiwanda Avenue and 4`h Street Sidewalk Improvements to be funded from Account Nos. 11333035650/1717133-0, 18820002314 and 11393035650/1780139-0. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Per previous Council action, bids were solicited, received and opened on November 22, 2011, for the subject project. The Engineer's estimate for the base bid was $74,103.00. Staff has reviewed all bids received and found them to be complete and in accordance with the bid requirements with any irregularities to be inconsequential. Staff has completed the required background investigation and finds the lowest responsive bidder meets the requirements of the bid documents. The scope of work consists of construction of concrete sidewalk, curb and gutter, driveway approach, retaining wall and fence, adjust utilities to new sidewalk grade, tree removal and minor landscaping. The contract documents call for thirty (30) working days to complete this construction.. Respectfully submitted, r Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer MAS/RMD/SH:Is P91 Attachments ti V I ti ~ ~ ~~ ----- 4ti o 3nv z 1~1 U a N33a~,~v0 ~i01 I dOSSAH `'' 3nV n H O ~ ~ 3n N3nV M o p Df~~ Z j ^ 3n VSO Jli I- ~ T_ ~~ L~~(~ ~rn 11 SAH13lVNm ~ ^ 3n OlV = ~~~ ~~~)1~ ~J ~-~ 3n NVV~' ~-1 ~-{ i J ~' IJHI Iii IV LiH;`~ .__ [n \ ` _ Qli J 1! T /' ° ~ anv 3noao --~~f 5 N N H ~ tiai.~~~ F W F g~ . ~ Ome Q Y ~ Q d ~ _ ~ U ~ F \' z z U U U U w z A E W E w~ O A BID SUMMARY FOR BID OPENING NOVEMBER 22, 2011 aPPaRENrLOw BIDDER z ETIWANDA AVENUE AND 4TH STREET ENGINEER'S Above Ail Names SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS ESTIMATE FBConstructlon Construction UNIT HID UNIT UNIT NO QTY UNIT DESCRIPTION COST AMOVNT COBT AMOUNT COBT AMOVNT BTIWANDA AVHNUE CLEARING AND GRUBBING (INCLUDES ALL $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $2,500.00 $2,500.00 $2,500.00 $2,500.00 1. 1 LS REMOVALS, MOBILIZATION AND GRADING) REMOVE TREES(SIZES 6" T 46" DIA.) INCLUDING ROOTS AND STUMP. FIELD $1,000.00 $7,000.00 $600.00 $4,200.OO $300.00 $2,100.00 2. 7 EA CHECK. ADJUST WATER METER TO NEW SIDEWALK $300.00 $300.00 $150.00 $150.00 $250.00 $250.00 3. 1 EA FINISH GRADE. CONSTRUCT 4" PCC PCC SIDEWALK PER $6.00 $17,a2a.0o $3.80 $11,035.20 $5.50 $15,972.00 4. 2904 SF CITY STD. NO. 103. CONSTRUCT DRIVE APPROACH PER CITY $8.00 S4,a [6.00 Sa.so $2,709.00 $12.00 57,2za.00 S. 602 SF STD. NO. 101. SAW CUT, REMOVE EXIST. DWY. AND REPLACE WITH 4" P.C.C. PAVEMENT. MATCH $8.00 $2.400.00 SS.oo 5[,500.00 515.00 54,500.00 6. 300 SF EXISTING CONSTRUCT 10" COBBLE CURB 8 GUTTER $60.00 $4,920.00 Sao.oo $3,280.00 $30.001 $2,a6o.oo 7. 82 LF PER CITY STD. NO. 105-A. SAWCUT EXISTING WALL AT EACH END AND CONSTRUCT PILASTER COLUMN WITH $120.00 $240.00 $1,500.00 $3,000.00 - $950.00 51,900.00 BRICK TO MATCH EXISTING FIRE STATION 8. 2 EA WALL NEXT DOOR. AND WROUGHT IRON FENCE PER DETAIL ON SHEET 3. MATCH FIRE STATION FENCE NEXT $115.00 $5,175.00 StU0.00 S4,500.00 Sa5.00 52,025.00 9. 45 LF DOOR RELOCATE MAIL BOX AND RE-INSTALL EXIST. POST OR RECONSTRUCT POST TO $500.00 $500.00 $160.00 S160.00 $150.00 $[50.00 10. 1 EA MATCH EXIST. REMOVE 2"THICK DIRT AND REPLACE WITH $60.00 5540.00 $300.00 $2,700.00 575.00 $675.00 11. 9 CV 2"THICK LAVA ROCK. REMOVE 4' DECOMPOSED GRANITE AND TRANFER TO HOMEOWER'S BACKYARD @ $100.00 5600.00 S50.00 S3o0.00 525.00 $150.00 12. 6 CY 6658 ETIWANDA. CONSTRUCT 4" A.C. PAVEMENT OVER $1 O OO $1,000.00 55.00 5500.00 S18.OO S1,800.00 13. 100 SF NATIVE. TRANSFER 1"0 TO 2"PJ TREE TO A 15 GAL. PLASTIC CONTAINER PROVIDED BV THE $500.00 53,000.00 S15o.o0 $900.00 $75.00 $a5o.oo 14. 6 EA HOMEOWNER AT 6688 ETIWANDA AVENUE ' PLANT 24" GALLON TREE -CRAPE MYRTLE, $500.00 57,500.00 Saoo.OO $1,200.00 $75.00 $225.00 15. 3 EA INCLUDING DOUBLE STAKED AND GUYING. INSTALL ICE PLAM SHRUBS EVENLY $4.00 S76o.oo S12.00 Sa80.00 518.00 5720.00 ] 6. 40 EA DISTRIBUTED. (MALEPHORA LUTEA 1 GAL.) INSTALL 3' PVC PIPE SLEEVE FOR FUTURE $5.00 Sto5.00 I SS.oO SloS.oo 515.00 $315.00 17. 21 LF IRRIGATION, SCHED 40. S54,680.00 I $39.'119.20 I $43,916.00 ETIWANDA AVENUE SUBTOTAL i 4TH BTREET CLEARING AND GRUBBING(INCLUDES ALL REMOVALS, AND MOBILIZATION AND $2,000.00 52,000.00 $1,500.00 St,500.00 $2,500.00 $2,500.00 1. 1 LS GRADING) CONSTRUCT 4" PCC SIDEWALK PER CITY STD. NO. 101 8 103. INCLUDING RE-GRADING $6.00 515,528.00 S3.eo 59,83a.ao SS.SO Sta,23a.00 2:1 SLOPE AT BACK OF SIDEWALK, SEE 2. 2588 SF DETAIL ON SHEET 4 ADJUST TRAFFIC SIGNAL PULL BOX AND ST. $250 00 $1.250.00 $[20.00 $600.00 $150.00 $750.00 3. 5 EA LIGHT PULL BOX. . CONSTRUCT RIVER WASHED GRANITE $15.00 $645.00 $14.00 $602.00 517.10 $735.30 4. 43 SF COBBLE STONE PER STD. NO. 542. $19.a23.oo S72,536.a0 S1b,219.30 4TH STREET SUBTOTAL - TOTAL 674,103.00 851,755.60 461,635.30 P93 BID SUMMARY FOR BID OPENING NOVEMBER 22, 2011 3 ~ 5 ETIWANDA AVENUE AND 4TH STREET T9R Construction do g.J. Grigolla C9nst. Co. SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS Ina ection [nc. RormN Inc UNIT BID UNIT UNIT NO QTr IDIIT DS.aCRIPTION CONT AMOUNT CONT AMOUNT COST AMOUNT aTIWANDA AVBNUB CLEARING AND GRUBBING (INCLUDES ALL 55,800.00 $5,800.00 $3,500.00 S3,soo.oo $2,500.00 52,500.00 1. 1 LS REMOVALS, MOBILIZATION AND GRADING) REMOVE TREES(SIZES 6" T 46" DIA.) INCLUDING ROOTS AND STUMP. FIELD $700.00 $x,900.00 $500.00 S3,SOO.oo $750.00 $5,250.00 2. 7 EA CHECK. ADJUST WATER METER TO NEW SIDEWALK S200.00 5200.00 $500.00 S5o0.00 Sloo.001 SI00.00 3. 1 EA FINISH GRADE. CONSTRUCT 4" PCC PCC SIDEWALK PER Sa o0 511,616.00 Ss.oo Sta,52o.00 53.50 S1o,t6a.o0 4. 2904 SF CITY STD. NO. 103. CONSTRUCT DRIVE APPROACH PER CITY $7 00 $4,218.00 $7.00 $4,278.00 $5.00 $3,010.00 5. 602 SF STD. NO. 101. SAWCUT, REMOVE EXIST. DWV. AND REPLACE WITH 4" P.C.C. PAVEMENT. MATCH 55.00 51,500.00 $6.00 51,800.00 $S.oo $7,SOO.oD 6. 300 SF EXISTING CONSTRUCT 10" COBBLE CURB & GUTTER 530.00 S2,a6o.00 S35.oo 52,&70.00 S7o.a01 S5,7ao.oo 7. 82 LF PER CITY STD. NO. 105-A. SAWCUT EXISTING WALL AT EACH END AND CONSTRUCT PILASTER COLUMN WITH g2,aoo.oo $4,&00.00 $1,500.00 53,000.00 $2,300.00 54,600.00 BRICK TO MATCH EXISTING FIRE STATION 8. 2 EA WALL NEX7 DOOR. AND W ROUGHT IRON FENCE PER DETAIL ON 5100 00 $4 500.00 St50.oo S6,75o.0o S130.o0 55,850.00 SHEET 3. MATCH FIRE STATION FENCE NEXT . , 9. 45 LF DOOR RELOCATE MAIL BOX AND RE-INSTALL EXIST. POST OR RECONSTRUCT POST TO 5200.00 5200.00 5250.00 5250.00 5300.00 S30o.00 10. 1 EA MATCH EXIST. REMOVE 2"THICK DIRT AND REPLACE WITH gt50.0o 57,350.00 $250.00 $2,250.00 $200.001 $1,800.00 11. 9 CY 2"THICK LAVA ROCK. REMOVE 4' DECOMPOSED GRANITE AND TRANFER TO HOMEOWER'S BACKYARD Ld 560.00 5360.00 $t25.oo S75o.00 5200.00 51,200.00 12. 6 CY 6658 ETIWANDA. CONSTRUCT 4"A.C. PAVEMEN70VER 5700 $700.00 S2o.oo) $2,000.00 $10.00 $7,000.00 13. 100 SF NATIVE. TRANSFER 1 "0 TO 2"0 TREE TO A 15 GAL. PLASTIC COMAINER PROVIDED BY THE SSO.oO 5300.00 $50.00 5300.00 $55.00 5330.00 14. 6 EA HOMEOWNER AT 6688 ETIWANDA AVENUE I PLANT 24" GALLON TREE -CRAPE MYRTLE, 5500.00 51,500.00 5350.00 SI,O50.00 5750.00 52,250.00 15. 3 EA INCLUDING DOUBLE STAKED AND GUYING. INSTALL ICE PLANT SHRUBS EVENLY $50.00 $2,000.00 $25.00 St,oOO.oo Ss.oo $200.00 16. 40 EA DISTRIBUTED. (MALEPHORA LUTEA 1 GAL.) INSTALL 3" PVC PIPE SLEEVE FOR FUTURE $ID.00 5210.00 i $15.001 $315.00 S10.00 S'L10.00 17. 21 LF IRRIGATION, SCHED 40. 546,2to.oo i $48569.00 $96,094.00 ETIWANDA AVENUE SUBTOTAL 4TH aTREET CLEARING AND GRUBBING(INCLUDES ALL REMOVALS, AND MOBILIZATION AND 55,000.00 55,000.00 51,000.00 57,000.00 $7,500.00 57,500.00 1. 1 LS GRADING) CONSTRUCT 4" PCC SIDEWALK PER CITY STD. NO. 101 8103. INCLUDING RE-GRADING $x.00 510,352.00 55.00 $12,980.00 $3.50 $9.058.00 2:1 SLOPE AT BACK OF SIDEWALK, SEE 2. 2588 SF DETAIL ON SHEET 4 ADJUST TRAFFIC SIGNAL PULL BOX AND ST. $100.00 $500.00 $75.00 $375.00 5250.00 $1,250.00 3. 5 EA LIGHT PULL BOX. CONSTRUCT RIVER WASHED GRANITE $70.00 $x30.00 $25.00 $1,075.00 $10.00 $830.00 4. 43 SF COBBLE STONE PER STD. NO. 542. 516,282.00 575,390.00 $18,238.00 4TH STREET SUBTOTAL TOTAL 561,491.00 863,989.00 $64,241.00 P94 BID SUMMARY FOR BID OPENING NOVEMBER 22, 2011 6 ~ 3 ETIWANDA AVENUE AND 4TH STREET More'e Fqulpmant E~ SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS JDC IDC. const. Inc. Vldo 9amarzich Inc VNIT SID UNIT UNIT NO QTY VNIT DESCRIPTION COST AMOUNT COST AMOUNT COST AMOUNT ETIWANDA AVENUB CLEARING AND GRUBBING (INCLUDES ALL $to,5oo.00 $10,500.00 S5,0o0.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 1. 1 LS REMOVALS, MOBILIZATION AND GRADING) REMOVE TREES(SIZES 6" T 46" DIA.) INCLUDING ROOTS AND STUMP. FIELD $300.00 $2,100.00 $800.00 $5,600.00 $700.00 $x,900.00 2. 7 EA CHECK. ADJUST WATER METER TO NEW SIDEWALK $2,600.00 $2,600.00 $100.00 5100.00 S150.00 $150.00 3. 1 EA FINISH GRADE. CONSTRUCT 4' PCC PCC SIDEWALK PER $a.oo 511,616.00 $5.00 51x,520.00 $6.00 $17,a2a.oo 4. 2904 SF CITY STD. NO. 103. CONSTRUCT DRIVE APPROACH PER CITV 86.00 $3,612.00 $6.00 $3,612.00 $8.00 $9,816.00 5. 602 SF STD. NO. 101. SAW CUT, REMOVE EXIST. DWV. AND REPLACE WITH 4" P.C.C. PAVEMENT. MATCH 56.00 51,800.00 S7.0o S2,10o.00 57.00 $2,100.00 6. 300 SF EXISTING CONSTRUCT 10" COBBLE CURB & GUTTER 595.00 $3,690.00 $50.001 $x,100.00 $x5.00 $3,690.00 7. 82 LF PER CITY STD. NO. 105-A. SAWCUT EXISTING WALL AT EACH END AND CONSTRUCT PILASTER COLUMN WITH $1,200.00 $2,400.00 Sl,aoO.oo $2,000.00 $1,000.00 $2,000.00 BRICK TO MATCH EXISTING FIRE STATION 8. 2 EA WALL NEM DOOR. AND W ROUGHT IRON FENCE PER DETAIL ON SHEET 3. MATCH FIRE STATION FENCE NEM 590.00 59,050.00 5100.00 Sa,soo.oo S150.OO S6,750.00 9. 45 LF DOOR RELOCATE MAIL BOX AND RE-INSTALL EXIST. POST OR RECONSTRUCT POST TO $100.00 $100.00 $250.00 $250.00 $300.00 $300.00 10. 1 EA MATCH EXIST. REMOVE 2' THICK DIRT AND REPLACE WITH 82p5.o0 $2,025.00 $250.001 52,250.00 560.00 Ssao.oo 11. 9 CY 2"THICK LAVA ROCK. REMOVE 4" DECOMPOSED GRANITE AND TRANFER TO HOMEOWER'S BACKYARD ~ 575.00 $x50.00 $150.00 $900.00 S75.oo $x50.00 12. 6 CY 6658 ETIWANDA. CONSTRUCT 4" A.C. PAVEMENT OVER $g.o0 5800.00 $10.00 $1,000.00 SlO.oo $1,000.00 13. 100 SF NATIVE. TRANSFER 1"0 TO 2"0 TREE TO A 15 GAL. PLASTIC CONTAINER PROVIDED BY THE Sso.oo 5300.00 Sso.oo S3oo.o0 590.00 52x0.00 14. 6 EA HOMEOWNER AT 6688 ETIWANDA AVENUE - PLANT 24" GALLON TREE -CRAPE MYRTLE, S250.00 S75o.00 5300.00 $900.00 5900.00 $1,200.00 15. 3 EA INCLUDING DOUBLE STAKED AND GUYING. INSTALL ICE PLANT SHRUBS EVENLY $15.00 5600.00 $30.00 $1,200.00 $15.00 $600.00 16. 40 EA DISTRIBUTED. (MALEPHORA LUTEA 1 GAL.) INSTALL 3" PVC PIPE SLEEVE FOR FUTURE S10.o0 5210.00 S20.o01 5420.00 $12.001 5252.00 17. 21 LF IRRIGATION, SCHED 40. 5x7,603.00 $ae,752.001 Sst.a 12.00 ETIWANDA AVENUE SUBTOTAL 4TH STREET CLEARING AND GRUBBING (INCLUDES ALL REMOVALS, AND MOBILIZATION AND 55,500.00 55,500.00 $5.000.00 S5,000.00 $3,000.00 S3,000.00 1. 1 LS GRADING) CONSTRUCT 4' PCC SIDEWALK PER CITY STD. NO. 101 8103. INCLUDING RE-GRADING $x.00 $10,352.00 55.00 $t 2,9x0.00 $6.00 S15,529.00 2:1 SLOPE AT BACK OF SIDEWALK, SEE 2. 2588 SF DETAIL ON SHEET 4 ADJUST TRAFFIC SIGNAL PULL BOX AND ST. glo0.o0 $500.00 SloO.oo $500.00 $100.00 $500.00 3. 5 EA LIGHT PULL BOX. CONSTRUCT RIVER WASHED GRANITE $10.00 $430.00 S25.OO $1,075.00 $20.00 $860.00 4. 43 SF COBBLE STONE PER STD. N0. 542. S16,782.00 $19,515.00 $19,888.00 4TH STREET SUBTOTAL TOTAL !164,355.00 7168,167.00 871,300.00 P95 BID SUMMARY FOR BID OPENING NOVEMBER 22, 2011 9 t0 tt ETIWANDA AVENUE AND 4TH STREET SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS H&T Worka Inc 611to com antes u.s. Inc. Martinez Concrete Inc DH1T 61D vHlr Darr HO QT4 IIHIT DESCHIlYI'ION COBT AL/OUHT COST AMOVNT C08T AIdO1MT ET[WAHDA AVEHUE CLEARING AND GRUBBING (INCLUDES ALL $10,000.00 $10,000.00 $4,500.00 $4,500.00 58,550.00 $8,550.00 1. 1 LS REMOVALS, MOBILIZATION AND GRADING) REMOVE TREES(SIZES 6" T 46" DIA.) INCLUDING ROOTS AND STUMP. FIELD $1,200.00 $8,800.00 $900.00 $6,300.00 $530.00 $3,710.00 2. 7 EA CHECK. ADJUST WATER METER TO NEW SIDEWALK g25o.00 5250.00 $150.00 5150.00 5180.00 S18o.00 3. 1 EA FINISH GRADE. CONSTRUCT 4' PCC PCC SIDEWALK PER $a,oo $11,616.00 $3.75 510,890.00 53.85 $10,o18.ao 4. 2904 SF CITV STD. NO. 103. CONSTRUCT DRIVE APPROACH PER CITV $5.00 $3,010.00 $6.50 53,913.00 $3.85 $2,317.70 S. 602 SF STD. NO. 101. SAW CUT, REMOVE EXIST. DWY. AND REPLACE WITH 4' P.C.C. PAVEMENT. MATCH $7.00 52,100.00 $11.50 $3,850.00 $9.95 $2,985.00 6. 300 SF EXISTING CONSTRUCT 10" COBBLE CURB 8 GUTTER 545.00 53.690.00 Sso.oo l Sa,too.00 $76.00 56.232.00 7. 82 LF PER CITY STD. NO. 105-A. SAW CUT EXISTING WALL A7 EACH END AND CONSTRUCT PILASTER COLUMN WITH $800.00 51,600.00 $750.00 S1,5oo.00 $579.82 $1,158.88 BRICK TO MATCH EXISTING FIRE STATION 8. 2 EA WALL NEXT DOOR. AND WROUGHT IRON FENCE PER DETAIL ON $200 00 ooo.o0 S9 5775.00 57,875.00 5318.bo S1 8,337.00 SHEET 3. MATCH FIRE STATION FENCE NEXT . , 9. 45 LF DOOR RELOCATE MAIL BOX AND RE-INSTALL EXIST. POST OR RECONSTRUCT POST TO 5200.00 5200.00 5200.00 $200.00 $175.00 $17s.oo 10. 1 EA MATCH EXIST. REMOVE 2"THICK DIRT AND REPLACE WITH $400.00 S3,6oo.0o St20.oo $1,080.00 5351.001 $3,159.00 11. 9 CV 2"THICK LAVA ROCK. REMOVE 4" DECOMPOSED GRANITE AND TRANFER TO HOMEOWER'S BACKYARD@ S1o0.o0 5600.00 S12o.o0 5720.00 S133.oo S1,o93.00 12. 6 CY 6658 ETIWANDA. CONSTRUCT 4" A.C. PAVEMENT OVER $12.00 51,200.00 S3.75 5375.00 515.121 51,512.00 13. 100 SF NATIVE. TRANSFER 1"0 TO 2"0 TREE TO A 15 GAL. PLASTIC COMAINER PROVIDED BY THE 575.00 5450.00 $800.00 52,800.00 Sae.oo 5288.00 14. 6 EA HOMEOWNER AT 6688 ETIWANDA AVENUE PLANT 24" GALLON TREE -CRAPE MYRTLE, 5120.00 5360.00 S7oo.o0 52,100.00 S583.00 57,789.00 15. 3 EA INCLUDING DOUBLE STAKED AND GUYING. I INSTALL ICE PLANT SHRUBS EVENLY S4o.0o $1,600.00 $50.00 $2,000.00 S27.oo $840.00 16. 40 EA DISTRIBUTED. (MALEPHORA LUTEA 1 GAL.) INSTALL 3" PVC PIPE SLEEVE FOR FUTURE S1o.0o $270.00 580.001 51,680.00 574.001 5294.00 17. 21 LF IRRIGATION. SCHED 40. 557.886.00 ~ $53,233.00 1 558,608.38 ETIWANDA AVENUE SUBTOTAL 4TH 6TREET , CLEARING AND GRUBBING (INCLUDES ALL REMOVALS, AND MOBILIZATION AND $2,000.00 52,000.00 54,500.00 $4,500.00 58,770.00 $8,770.00 1. 1 LS GRADING) CONSTRUCT 4" PCC SIDEWALK PER CITY STD. NO. 101 & 103. INCLUDING RE-GRADING 54.00 $10,352.00 53.75 S9,7os.oo S3.25 Seal l.oo 2:1 SLOPE AT BACK OF SIDEWALK, SEE 2. 2588 SF DETAIL ON SHEET 4 ADJUST TRAFFIC SIGNAL PULL BOX AND ST. $150.00 $750.00 $350.00 $1,750.00 $85.00 $425.00 3. 5 EA LIGHT PULL BOX. CONSTRUCT RIVER WASHED GRANITE $12.00 $S1fi.00 $60.00 $2,580.00 $36.50 $1,569.50 4. 43 SF COBBLE STONE PER STD. NO. 542. S13,618.00 $18,535.00 515,175.50 4TH STREET SUBTOTAL TOTAL 571,304.00 1 571,768.00 1 573,779.84 P96 BID SUMMARY FOR BID OPENING NOVEMBER 22, 2011 12 73 ~< ETIWANDA AVENUE AND 4TH STREET Aramexx SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS All American Ae halt Dent Brother. lne Construction VNIT BID UNIT UHIT BO QTY UNIT DBBCRIPTION COST AMOUNT COST AMOUNT COST AMOVI'lT ETIWANDA AVBRUE CLEARING AND GRUBBING (INCLUDES ALL $1a,6a7so $14,6a7so $la,6oo.00 $14,600.00 $18,000.00 $ta,oo0.00 1. 1 LS REMOVALS, MOBILIZATION AND GRADING) REMOVE TREES(SIZES 6" T 46" DIA.) INCLUDING ROOTS AND STUMP. FIELD ~ S7oo.oo Sa,9oo.00 $600.00 $a,2oo.00 $725.00 $5,075.00 2. 7 EA CHECK. ADJUST WATER METERTO NEW SIDEWALK g60.o0 $60.00 5600.00 8600.00 $150.001 $150.00 3. 1 EA FINISH GRADE. CONSTRUCT 4' PCC PCC SIDEWALK PER g.1_so $13,068.00 $7.00 $20,328.00 $3.95 810,015.80 4. 2904 SF CITY STD. NO. 103. CONSTRUCT DRIVE APPROACH PER CITV $5.25 S3,160so $7.00 $4,21 a.oo ~ $3.50 $2,107.00 5. 602 SF STD. NO. 101. SAW CUT, REMOVE EXIST. DWY. AND REPLACE WITH 4" P.C.C. PAVEMENT. MATCH 510.00 $3,000.00 58.00 $2,400.00 512.00 53,600.00 6. 300 SF EXISTING CONSTRUCT 10" COBBLE CURB 8 GUTTER $80.00 $6,560.00 $35.00 $2,870.00 $68.00 $5,576.00 7. 82 LF PER CITY STD. N0. 105-A. SAWCUT EXISTING WALL AT EACH END AND CONSTRUCT PILASTER COLUMN WITH $2,100.00 54,200.00 $2,000.00 $4,000.00 $1,500.00 S3,ooo.oo BRICK TO MATCH EXISTING FIRE STATION 8. 2 EA WALL NEXT DOOR. AND WROUGHT IRON FENCE PER DETAIL ON 00 5215 675.00 59 5120.00 SS,aOO.oo $275.00 $12,375.00 SHEET 3. MATCH FIRE STATION FENCE NEM . , 9. 45 LF DOOR RELOCATE MAIL BOX AND RE-INSTALL EXIST. POST OR RECONSTRUCT POST TO 560.00 560.00 S20o.o0 5200.00 $100.00 S100.00 10. 1 EA MATCH EXIST. REMOVE 2"THICK DIRT AND REPLACE W ITH $226.00 S2,o3a.oo $300.00 S2,7oo.00 S35o.o0 53,150.00 11. 9 CY 2"THICK LAVA ROCK. REMOVE 4" DECOMPOSED GRANITE AND TRANFER TO HOMEOWER'S BACKVARD@ 5131.00 $786.00 $300.00 51,800.00 5a9.0o $29a.oo 12. 6 CY 6658 ETIWANDA. CONSTRUCT 4' A.C. PAVEMENT OVER S12.00 S1,2oo.0o S2o.oo S2,oo0.0o S16.00 51,600.00 13. 100 SF NATIVE. TRANSFER 1 "Pl TO 2"0 TREE TO A 15 GAL. PLASTIC COMAINER PROVIDED BY THE $53.00 5318.00 $200.00 51,200.00 S5a.0o S3a8.oo 14. 6 EA HOMEOWNER AT 6688 ETIWANDA AVENUE PLANT 24"GALLON TREE-CRAPE MYRTLE, Sa20.00 51,260.00 5900.00 81,200.00 S90.00 5270.00 15. 3 EA INCLUDING DOUBLE STAKED AND GUVING. INSTALL ICE PLANT SHRUBS EVENLY 58.50 S3ao.o0 Sls.OO S600.00 S14.00 5560.00 16. 40 EA DISTRIBUTED. (MALEPHORA LUTEA 1 GAL.) INSTALL 3" PVC PIPE SLEEVE FOR FUTURE $15.00 $315.00 $20.OO 5920.00 I $B.OO $168.00 17. 21 LF IRRIGATION, SCHED 40. 565,58a.oo 568,732.001 i 566,397.80 ETIWANDA AVENUE SUBTOTAL 4TH 6TREET CLEARING AND GRUBBING (INCLUDES ALL REMOVALS, AND MOBILIZATION AND St,500.00 $1,500.00 $2,000.00 $2.000.00 Su,200.00 511,200.00 1. 1 LS GRADING) CONSTRUCT 4" PCC SIDEWALK PER CITY STD. N0. 101 8103. INCLUDING RE-GRADING Sa.50 $11,646.00 56.00 515,528.00 $3.10 S8,022.80 2:1 SLOPE AT BACK OF SIDEWALK, SEE 2. 2588 SF DETAIL ON SHEET 4 ADJUST TRAFFIC SIGNAL PULL BOX AND ST. $t 10.00 ' $550.00 5100.00 5500.00 5250.00 $1,250.00 3. 5 EA LIGHT PULL BOX. CONSTRUCT RIVER WASHED GRANITE $x0.00 $1,720.00 $10.00 $430.00 Sso.oo $2,150.00 4. 43 SF COBBLE STONE PER STD. NO. 542. $15,416.00 $18,458.00 522,622.80 4TH STREET SUBTOTAL TOTAL 481,000.00 987,190.00 889,014.60 P97 STAFF REPORT PUBLIC WORKS SERVICES DEP+IRTMENT Date: December 2l, 2011 To: Mayor and Members of the City Council Chair and Members of the Redevelopment Agency John R. Gillison, City Manager From: William Wittkopf, Public Works Services Director By: Ernest Ruiz, Streets, Storm Drains and Fleet Superintendent Michael Maston, Assistant Engineer RANCtio CUCAMONGA Subject: ACCEPT THE "STORM DRAIN LIFT STATION MAINTENANCE PROJECT°, CONTRACT NO. CO 11-047/RA 11-004, AS COMPLETE; RELEASE THE BONDS, ACCEPT A MAINTENANCE BOND; APPROVE THE RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE PUBLIC WORKS SERVICES DIRECTOR TO FILE A NOTICE OF COMPLETION, AND APPROVE THE FINAL CONTRACT AMOUNT OF $81,442.30. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council and Redevelopment Agency Board accept the Storm Drain Lift Station Maintenance Project Contract No. CO 11-047/RA 11-004, as complete, approve the resolution authorizing the Public Works Services Director to file a Notice of Completion, release the Faithful Performance Bond, accept a Maintenance Bond, authorize the release of the Labor and Materials Bond in the amount of $79,090 six months after the recordation of said notice ff no claims have been received and authorize the release of the retention in the amount of $8,144.23, thirty-five (35) days after acceptance. Also approve the final contract in the amount of $81,442.30. BACKGROUNDIANALYSIS The subject project has been completed in accordance with the approved plans and spec~cetions and to the satisfaction of the Public Works Services Director. The Storm Drain Lift Station Maintenance Project scope of work included the installation of new pumps at Archibald Avenue end south of Devon Street and at Etiwanda Avenue and south of Arrow Route. Pertinent information of the project is as follows - Budgeted Amount: - Account Numbers: - City Council's Approval to Advertise: - Publish dates for local paper: $65,000 1122303-5650/17781220 (South Etiwanda Drainage) 2660801-5607 (2004 Tax Allocation Bonds) January 19, 2011 January 25 and February 1, 2011 P98 P99 PUBLIC WORKS SERVICES DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT Re: ACCEPT STORM DRAIN LIFT STATION MAINTENANCE PROJECT DECEMBER 21, 2011 Page 2 - Bid Opening: - Contract Award Date: - Low Bidder: - Contract Amount: - Contingency: - Final Contract Amount: - Increase in Contract Amount: February 22, 2011 April 20, 2011 Scorpion Backhoe $79, 090 $ 7,910 $81,442.30 $ 2,352.30 (3%) The contract amount increased by $2,352.30 due to two contract change orders. Change Order No. 1 contained the modification of the steel screen mesh to a stainless steel screen mesh. This change will provide for a longer lasting and durable debris screen mesh. Change Order No. 2 contained the new circuit breaker and the stainless steel shackles. The existing etedrical panel did not have the required circuit breaker space, so a new circuit breaker was installed. The stainless steel shackles were needed to connect the lifting cables to the eyepiece on the pumps. Rasp ully bmitt , William Wittkopf Public Works Services Director 1NW:ERlmm Attachment P100 RESOLUTION NO. 11-181 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR THE STORM DRAIN LIFT STATION MAINTENANCE PROJECT AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for the Storm Drain Lift Station Maintenance Project have been completed to the satisfaction of the Public Works Services Director; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work is complete. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council and the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves that the work is hereby accepted and the Public Works Services Director is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. STAFF REPORT RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT RANCHO Date: December 2l, 2011 C,UCAMONGA To: President and Members of the Board of Directors John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Mike Bell, Fire Chief By: Janet Walker, Management Analyst II Subject: ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION MAKING DETERMINATIONS REGARDING THE PROPOSED ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY (LEWIS OPERATION CORP. - APN: 0227-131-03, 08 & 62 -ANNEXATION NO. 11-5) LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF BASE LINE RD., BETWEEN ETIWANDA AVE. AND EAST AVE. TO AN EXISTING COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT, CALLING A SPECIAL ELECTION AND AUTHORIZING SUBMITTAL OF LEVY OF SPECIAL TAXES TO THE QUALIFIED ELECTORS RECOMMENDATION Consideration of adoption of a resolution making determinations and authorizing the submittal of the levy of special taxes to the qualified electors of territory proposed to be annexed (Lewis Operating Corp. -Annexation No. 11-5) to existing Community Facilities District No. 85-1 ("CFD No. 85-1") and calling a special election for such purpose. BACKGROUND Lewis Operating Corp., property owner, has submitted a proposal to build a 33 lot subdivision on 10.35 acres on the north side of Base Line Rd., between Etiwanda Ave. and East Ave. (APNs 0227-131-03, 08 & 62; the "Annexation Area") and is conditioned by the City and Fire District to annex to the existing Community Facilities District (CFD) 85-1 in order to mitigate the development's impact upon fire protection services. On November 2, 2011, the Board initiated formal annexation proceedings pursuant to the provisions of the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982 (the "Mello-Roos Act") by adopting Resolution No. FD 11-041 approving an Annexation Map (Exhibit "A") of the territory proposed to be annexed and the Resolution of Intention to Annex APNs 0227-131- 03, 08 & 62 into the existing CFD 85-1. This Resolution, among other things, declared the intention of the Board of Directors to levy a special tax within the Annexation Area to finance fire protection and suppression services and setting a public hearing regarding the proposed annexation to be held on December 21, 2011. ~J P101 P102 Annexation of Territory to an existing CFD 85-1 December 21.2011 Through adoption of this resolution before the Board this evening, the Board will accomplish the following: Make certain determinations as set forth in the resolution Call for a special election to be conducted on January 4, 2012 Authorize submittal of the levy of the special tax to qualified electors of the Annexation Area at such special election ANALYSIS The annexation of the Annexation Area into CFD No. 85-1 will satisfy the conditions of development relating to mitigating impacts upon fire protection services. Lewis Operating Corp., property owner, is in full support of the annexation of the property being annexed. Pursuant to the Mello-Roos Act, whenever there have been less than 12 persons registered to vote within the Annexation Area for each of the 90 days preceding the public hearing pertaining to such annexation, the vote shall be by the landowners within the Annexation Area. Therefore, in the current circumstances, the election will be a landowner's vote, the landowner having one vote per acre or portion thereof of land within the Annexation Area. Lewis Operating Corp., owner of the property within the Annexation Area, has executed a "Consent and Waiver" of time frames relating to the election. Exhibit "A" of the Resolution sets forth the rate and method of apportionment of the special tax proposed to be levied within the Annexation Area which is consistent with the special tax levied upon all territory currently within CFD No. 85-1. At the special election to be held on January 4, 2012, the landowner(s) will be entitled to cast its ballot. The Board Secretary will then canvas the ballot, if received. At the next Board meeting, the Board will consider adopting the resolution declaring the election results and the annexation of the Annexation Area to CFD No. 85-1. If 2/3 of the votes are cast in favor of the levy of the special tax, the Board may declare the property to be annexed. The Public Notice regarding the Public Hearing has been advertised in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin. Respectfully submitted, (~~ ike Bell Fire Chief Attachments 1. Annexation Map 2. Resolution 3. CFD No. 85-1 Map P10 r r _. -o~,.. E. W °` 5_o5o°E: N 31tl05 O110N 5~ ~` ~ _~ Y ~'-: IED s ~z~~ ~fr8 ~ ~gm€s °Eg`~ 663 ~6 O .E ~B ~ °o C'^%6 `YbcOS °E ~5 ~5 eSSoe Eo°E°e ~ ~° 31YCAr 15v3 c~ o°~ Obo 6 o~-oc ~e§FZ~8 ~ n W ~ C V YDV w s~ ~~ ~ m6 _ =Ro: vi "~°~ b`= 6 a i b6 s~_ _ 'sa _ ~ ~~ - as ~ s s66b~o a ~ €e 6 Z~ a Q.es V~EE- `. 0 6 €2 6 U ~° ~'° ~ °c6„ ~9 ~3~s ~ E ;° 06$ g o c~Y~b= 5o°~e N n ~ ~ s ~~o E `_"_s2 p" L ~ L a ~ o~ a ~' coa`CY'^5 c u°i ~ z~ 6 a86; a $ eB` ' 3~w3rr ran~.u3 @ _` ~ a m~ ~ V S 6~ e b ° b LF ~ 5'6°_" 6_ ° c ° ~ os ae :$~ 8 e~%~~ aye ag "ss ~ E :t °~~e U Q woe Leo «~ a _ ,~~a 50~ .~~ ~ ~smoJ o<a~ m ~ Z ~ _ ~ O O °w ~ Z J Q ~ ~ U 3f1N3/~tl lStl3 _ I ~ ~ w ~ v~~ f =- a a >~:ri a wz ~r ~~ ~/Us Q ~ Z ~. I 1~J.. ~ N ~ - LL ~ ~ ~ O Q d ,n ~ a O do Z Q Q w ~~r ~~~ O``~m P33'~" ~ F ~ z Q Z o N Z~Q° ~~ Q w z ~ Z o ~ ~ H p g ~ 9088E Wll L~ U ~ Ana ~ i i -~ i Q 0 Iw I `eb~C s n m N a~~k~b~;~ ' - " oo~o ~~~B~~b b z - ..neon bon~e:tlH3Np~ ~ _~ f ~.NNN Ysfz u~n~'~yaEaul ^V - - ~ - - -- o ¢ 0 0 0 °y.~b9n9€g8n w 3NN3Atl tlONtlMLL3 w P704 RESOLUTION NO. FD 11- O S2 A' RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, MAKING CERTAIN DETERMINATIONS REGARDING THE PROPOSED ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY (ANNEXATION NO. 11-5) TO AN EXISTING COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT (CFD 85-1) AND CALLING A SPECIAL ELECTION AND AUTHORIZING THE SUBMITTAL OF THE LEVY OF SPECIAL TAXES TO THE QUALIFIED ELECTORS OF SUCH TERRITORY WHEREAS, the BOARD OF DIRECTORS (the "Board of Directors") of the RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT (the "Fire Protection District"), RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, has previously declared its intention and held and conducted proceedings relating to the annexation of territory to an existing community facilities district pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982", being Chapter 2.5, Part 1, Division 2, Title 5 of the Government Code of the State of California, and specifically Article 3.5 thereof (the "Act"). The existing Community Facilities District has been designated as COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1 (the "District"); and, WHEREAS, notice of a public hearing relating to the annexation of territory to the District, the extent of the territory to be annexed (the "Annexation Area"), the furnishing of certain public services and all other related matters has been given; and, WHEREAS, it has now been determined that written protests have not been received by 50% or more of the registered voters residing either within the Annexation Area or the District and/or property owners representing more than one-half (1 /2) or more of the area of land within the Annexed Area or within District; and, WHEREAS, inasmuch as there have been less than twelve (12) persons registered to vote within the Annexation Area for each of the 90 preceding days, this legislative body desires to submit the levy of the required special tax to the landowners of the Annexation Area, said landowners being the qualified electors as authorized by law. NOW, THEREFORE, THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. RECITALS The above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2. DETERMINATIONS It is determined by this Board of Directors that: A. all proceedings prior hereto were valid and taken in conformity with the requirements of law, and specifically the provisions of the Act; B. less than twelve (12) registered voters have resided within the Annexation Area for each of the ninety (90) days preceding the close of the public hearing and, consequently, the qualified electors shall be the landowners of the Annexation Area and each landowner who is the owner of record as of the close of the public hearing, or the authorized representative thereof, shall have one vote for each acre or portion of an acre of land that she or he owns within the Annexation Area; P105 C. the time limit specified by the Actfor conducting an election to submit the levy of the special taxes to the qualified electors of the Annexation Area and the requirements for impartial analysis and ballot arguments have been waived with the unanimous consent of the qualified electors of the Annexation Area; D. the Secretary, acting as the election official, has consented to conducting any required election on a date which is less than 125 days following the adoption of this resolution; and E. the public services proposed to be financed from the proceeds of special taxes to be levied within the Annexation Area are necessary to meet increased demands placed upon the Fire Protection District as a result of development and/or rehabilitation occurring in the Annexation Area. SECTION 3. BOUNDARIES OF ANNEXED AREA The boundaries and parcels of land in the Annexation Area and on which special taxes are proposed to be levied in order to pay the costs and expenses for the public services described in Section 4 below are generally described as follows: All that property and territory proposed to be annexed to the District, as said property is shown on a map as previously approved by this legislative body, said map entitled "Annexation Map No. 11-5 of Community Facilities District No. 85-1 of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, County Of San Bernardino, State Of California" (the "Annexation Map"), a copy of which is on file in the Office of the Secretary and shall remain open for public inspection. SECTION 4. DESCRIPTION OF SERVICES The services that are authorized to be financed from the proceeds of special taxes levied within the District are certain services which are in addition to those services required for the territory within the District and will not be replacing services already available. A general description of the services authorized to be financed by the District is as follows: The performance by employees of functions, operations, maintenance and repair activities in order to provide fire protection and suppression services. The District shall finance all direct, administrative and incidental annual costs and expenses necessary to provide such services. . The same types of services which are authorized to be financed by the District from the proceeds of special taxes levied within the District are the types of services proposed to be financed from the special taxes proposed to be levied within the Annexation Area. If and to the extent possible such services shall be provided in common with District and the Annexation Area. SECTION 5. SPECIAL TAX Except where funds are otherwise available and subject to the approval of the qualified electors of the Annexation Area, a special tax sufficient to pay for the services described in Section 4 that are required for the Annexation Area, secured by recordation of a continuing lien against all non-exempt real property in the Annexation Area will be levied annuallywithin the boundaries of the Annexation Area. For particulars as to the rate and method of apportionment of the proposed special tax, reference is made to the attached and incorporated Exhibit "A"which sets forth in sufficient detail the method of apportionment to allow each landowner or resident within the Annexation Area to clearly estimate the maximum amount of the special tax that such person will have to pay. Resolution No. FD 11- -Page -2 P706 The special taxes shall be collected in the same manner as ad valorem property taxes and shall be subject to the same penalties, procedure, sale and lien priority in any case of delinquency, as applicable for ad valorem taxes; however, as applicable, this Board of Directors may, by resolution, establish and adopt an alternate or supplemental procedure as necessary. Any special taxes that may not be collected on the County tax roll shall be collected through a direct billing procedure by the Treasurer of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, acting for and on behalf of the District. SECTION 6. SPECIAL TAX ACCOUNTABILITY MEASURES Pursuant to and in compliance with the provisions of Government Code Section 50075.1, this Board of Directors hereby establishes the following accountability measures pertaining to the levy by the District of the special taxes within the Annexation Area as described in Section 5 above: A. Each such special tax shall be levied for the specific purposes section in Section 5. above. B. The proceeds of the levy of each such special tax shall be applied only to the specific applicable purposes set forth in Section 5. above. C. The District shall establish a separate account into which the proceeds of the special taxes levied within the District shall tie deposited. D. The Fire Chief or his or her designee, acting for and on behalf of the District, shall annually file a report with the Board of Directors as required pursuant to Government Code Section 50075.3. SECTION 7. ELECTION The proposition related to the levy of the special tax shall be submitted to the qualified electors of the Annexation Area, said electors being the landowners, with each landowner having one (1) vote for each acre or portion thereof of land which he or she owns within said annexed territory. The special election shall be held on the 4th day of JANUARY 2012, and said election shall be a special election to be conducted by the Secretary (hereinafter "Election Official"). If the proposition for the levy of the special tax receives the approval of more than two-thirds (2/3) of the votes cast on the proposition, the special tax may be levied as provided for in this Resolution and the Board of Directors may determine that the Annexation Area is added to and part of the District. SECTION 8. BALLOT The ballot proposal to be submitted to the qualified voters at the election shall generally be as follows: PROPOSITION A RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1, AUTHORIZATION FOR SPECIAL TAX LEVY Shall Community Facilities District No. 85-1 of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District be authorized to levy special taxes within the territory shown on "Annexation Map No. 11-4 of Community Facilities District No. 85-1 of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, County Of San Bernardino, State Of California" (the "Annexation Map") pursuant to the rate and method of apportionment of special taxes (the "Special Tax Formula") set forth Resolution No. FD 11- -Page -3 P107 in Resolution No. FD 11-029 to finance fire suppression and protection services and administrative expenses? SECTION 9. VOTE The appropriate mark placed in the voting square afterthe word "YES" shall be counted in favor of the adoption of the proposition, and the appropriate mark placed in the voting square after the word "NO" in the manner as authorized, shall be counted against the adoption of said proposition. SECTION 10. ELECTION PROCEDURE The Election Official is hereby authorized to take any and all steps necessary for the holding of said election. Said Election Official shall perform and render all services and proceedings incidental to and gonnected with the conduct of said election, and said services shall include, but not be limited to the following: A. Prepare and furnish to the election officers necessary election supplies for the conduct of the election. B. Cause to be printed the requisite number of official ballots, tally sheets and other necessary forms. C. Furnish and address official ballots for the qualified electors of the Annexation Area. D. Cause the official ballots to be mailed and/ordelivered, as required by law. E. Receive the returns of the election. F. Sort and assemble the election material and supplies in preparation for the canvassing of the returns. G. Canvass the returns of the election. H. Furnish a tabulation of the number of votes given, in the election. I. Make all arrangements and take the necessary steps to pay all costs of the election incurred as a result of services performed for the District and pay costs and expenses of all election officials. J. Conduct and handle all other matters relating to the proceedings and conduct of the election in the manner and form as required by law. Resolution No. FD 11- -Page -4 P108 PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: ATTEST: Janice C. Reynolds, Secretary dayof 2011. L. Dennis Michael, President I, JANICE C. REYNOLDS, SECRETARY of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, at a Regular Meeting of said Board held on the dayof 2011. Executed this dayof 2011 at Rancho Cucamonga, Cali~rnia. Janice C. Reynolds, Secretary Resolution No. FD 11- -Page -5 P109 EXHIBIT "A" COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1 ANNEXATION NO. 11-5 RATE AND METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT OF SPECIAL TAXES The rate and method of apportionment, limitations on and adjustment to the Special Tax shall be as follows: To pay for fire suppression services, the Maximum Special Tax in Community Facilities District No. 85-1, Annexation No. 11-5 for Fiscal Year 2011-2012 shall be: Structures Maximum Annual Special Tax Residential 1 DU = ($151.71) Multi-Family 2 DU: 1.75 = ($151.71) 3 DU: 2.25 = ($151.71) 4 DU: 2.65 = ($151.71) 5-14 DU: 2.65 = ($151.71) + {.35 (TU-4) ($151.71)} 15-30 DU: 6.15 = ($151.71) + {.30 (TU-14) ($151.71)} 31-80 DU: 10.65 = ($151.71) + {.25 (TU-30) ($151.71)} 81 - up DU: 23.15 = ($151.71) + {.20 (TU-80) ($151.71)} Commercial ($151.71) per acre + $.082 per SF Industrial ($151.71) per acre + $.100 per SF Note: DU =Dwelling Unit TU =Total Units SF =Square Foot ANNUAL ADJUSTMENT The maximum Special Tax shall be annually adjusted commencing on July 1, 2011 and each July 1 s` thereafter for (a) changes in the cost of living or (b) changes in cost of living and changes in population as defined in Section 7901 of the Government Code, as amended, whichever is lesser. Resolution No. FD 11- -Page -6 P110 REDUCTION IN SPECIAL TAX Commercial and industrial structures shall be granted a reduction in the Special Tax for the installation of complete sprinkler systems. In addition, multifiloor commercial and industrial structures shall be granted a reduction in Special Tax for each separate floor above or below the main ground floor of the structure. LIMITATION ON SPECIAL TAX LEVY The Special Tax shall only be levied on Developed Property. Developed Property is defined to be property: which is not owned by a public or governmental agency; which is not vacant; - where a "certificate of occupancy" or "utility release" from the City of Rancho Cucamonga has been issued; which has an existing building or structure onsite; - which does not have as its sole use power transmission towers, railroad tracks, and flood control facilities. Areas granted as easements for such purposes shall be subtracted from the total acreage of the underlying lot. The annual levy of the Special Tax shall be based upon an annual determination by the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District of the amount of other revenues available to meet budget requirements. As used in this formula, "available revenue" shall include ad valorem taxes, State of California augmentation, tax increment revenues received from the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and any other source of revenue except the Special Tax. The Board of Directors shall take all responsible steps to retain maximum Redevelopment Agency funding to which, by agreement, they may lawfully receive. To the extent available revenues are insufficient to meet budget requirements, the Boarci of Directors may levy the Special Tax. For further particulars regarding the rate and method of apportionment of the Special Tax, reference is made to the Final Report Mello-Roos Community Facilities District No. 85-1 for Fire Suppression Facilities/Services -Foothill Fire Protection District, a copy of which is on file in the office of the Fire Chief of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District. Resolution No. FD 11- -Page -7 ~ ~ ~ ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ V O ~ .y ii O .~ ~ M O i ~ ~ ~ = N Q O ' ~ a Q V ny ua~lll!W ny uaneH ny esowJaH ny Pleq!yoJH ny uewllaH iS uellawe~ of U~ ~~ U 0 N epu 18 ~aaJ~ nep ny Jaisayoob ~._-- C N ~ o c N m NP111 a~ _~ - ny ~(JJay~ v '~ ~ c c _ J ~ m ~ w ~ z 3 m ~ ~ Q ii Q r ~ N '~ ~ J OD w ~ U U ~ ~-: J ~~ J ® O O lse3 in L ~'~ ny epuemg3 ny Ja~sayooa I ny ua~!II!W ® ny uaneH - ® ny esowJaH ^ a nb' Ple4!4oJd I ° ' ny uewllaH a e ~~ ~ L L ~ ny pJe~(auln 3H_~9E4dfxxf:aF p Spy€~Lp~F_Fy2 F: C L'-. Ex"ppf ~~g L N L ~ ~ `~°~~~2 F~~g€~ m w O ~€~E~3"e :P ~s3 CD LL Q $~~g2, `: sy age e-C3safigt~~~`. ~~~~?g~E~'~4 z g~g3 Y~`-: gp~pYpp EaEst :f Y¢o°glsY9€~ 94~'e9i'l Fa°Lvv'g1 ~f ~~ ~E~:°a?fie°a{CCC STAFF REPORT ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT Date: December 21, 2011 To: Mayor and Members of the City Council John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Mark A. Steuer, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer By: Walter C. Stickney, Associate Engineer P712 RANCHO C,,UCAMONGA Subject: REVIEW AND APPROVE THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR THE WILSON AVENUE EXTENSION -EAST AVENUE TO WARDMAN-BULLOCK ROAD PROJECT RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the City Council approve the Resolution which: • Adopts the environmental findings pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) • Certifies the Final Environmental Impact Report for the Wilson Avenue Extension from East Avenue to Wardman-Bullock Road project (project) • Adopts a Statement of Findings • Adopts a Statement of Overriding Considerations • Adopts a Mitigation Monitoring Plan BACKGROUND The project extends Wilson Avenue from East Avenue to Wardman-Bullock Road. The extension will provide a second access to the extreme northeast portion of the City, in particular east of East Avenue. This second access will provide two primary benefits to this area of the City. First, the response time for emergency vehicles into this easterly area will be reduced. Second, traffic congestion around the elementary and secondary schools in the vicinity of Banyan Street and East Avenue will be reduced. Engineering staff has contracted with the design and environment consulting firm of AEI-CASC for the preparation of the Draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR) as well as the street improvement drawings for the extension of Wilson Avenue. The environmental review process has involved sending the DEIR to the State Clearinghouse for distribution to interested parties. Comments have been received from this distribution. AEI-CASC has responded to those comments received, and in turn have incorporated those responses into the DEIR. Three alternate projects were reviewed: • No build (Alternate A) • The expansion of Banyan Street (Alternate B) • Reduced improvement of Wilson Avenue (Alternate C) P713 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Re: Wilson Avenue Extension -East Avenue and Wardman-Bullock Road Project December 21, 2011 Alternate C is deemed to be environmentally superior over that of the original proposed project (the ultimate improvement of Wilson Avenue), and would result in better emergency response times and a more efficient traffic and circulation system over Alternates A or B. The DEIR was prepared in compliance with CEQA. Staff and the consultant have evaluated the DEIR for the project. Based upon comments received during the public review process and the potential impacts of the project, staff has determined the DEIR is necessary and adequate to evaluate the environmental issues raised by the project. All unavoidable impacts resulting from the project were reviewed. The DEIR determined the economic and social benefits outweighed any adverse impacts. All environmental categories were evaluated in the DEIR. A summary of project related impacts, and the recommended mitigation measures, is provided in the DEIR. This item was advertised with a legal advertisement as a public hearing in the December 5, 2011, edition of the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper. In addition, all individuals submitting comments during the comment period received copies of the Final Program DEIR at least ten days prior to the City Council hearing as required by CEQA. The extension of Wilson Avenue from East Avenue to Wardman-Bullock Road will provide social and .economic benefits, traffic and circulation benefits, as well as safety benefits, to the northeast corner of the City. Emergency vehicles, as well as City residents, will be provided a secondary access to and from that northeast area. This secondary route will reduce emergency response time as well as relieve congestion within the northeast area of the City. submitted, ~~~ Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer MAS/W CS:Is Attachments: Exhibit A -Draft EIR Resolution Vicinity Ma Wilson Ave. Extension from East Ave. to Wardman/Bullock Rd. P115 RESOLUTION NO. ~~-~p A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, ADOPTING THE ENVIRONMENTAL FINDINGS PURSUANT TO THE CALIFORNIA ENVIORMENTAL QUALITY ACT, CERTIFYING THE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR THE WILSON AVENUE EXTENSION -EAST AVENUE TO WARDMAN-BULLOCK ROAD PROJECT (SCH 2008071044), ADOPTING A STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS, AND ADOPTING A MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM Whereas, pursuant to the provisions of Government Code Section 65450 et seq., a public hearing was held before the City of Rancho Cucamonga City Council in Rancho Cucamonga California on December 21, 2011 to consider Environmental Impact Report (State Clearinghouse #2008071044) for the Wilson Avenue Extension (East) Project; and, Whereas the matter was discussed full with testimony and documentation presented by the public and affected public agencies; and, Whereas all procedures of the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") have been met ahd Final Environmental Impact Report (State Clearinghouse #2008071044) is sufficiently detailed so that all the potentially significant effects of the Project on the environment and measures necessary to avoid or substantially lessen such effects have been evaluated in accordance with CEQA; and, Whereas; pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15105, Draft EIR (SCH#2008071044) was released for the 45-day public review and comment period from March 2, 2010 to April 16, 2010. During the 45-day public review and comment period, the City of Rancho Cucamonga, ("City"), as the lead agency, received one comment letter from public agencies and the public on the draft EIR. After the close of the public review and comment period, one comment letter has been received through December 7, 2011. Whereas, significant environmental impacts were identified as a result of Project implementation that cannot be feasibly avoided or mitigated below a level of significance; and, Whereas, it is necessary that the City prepare a Statement of Findings (Publid Resources Code Section 21081 and CEQA Guidelines Section 15091), a Statement of Overriding Considerations (CEQA Guidelines Section 15093), and Mitigation Monitoring Plan (Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 and CEQA Guidelines Section 15097), regarding adverse environmental impacts for Project implementation that cannot be feasibly avoided or mitigated to below a level of significance; and, Whereas, the Statement of Overriding Considerations is contained herein, and the Mitigation Monitoring Plan is attached to this Resolution, now therefore; BE IT RESOLVED, FOUND, DETERMINED, AND ORDERED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, in regular session assembled on December 21, 2011, that; RESOLUTION NO. December 21, 2011 Page 2 The Wilson Avenue Extension Project is comprised of public improvements of Wilson Avenue between East Avenue and Wardman Bullock Road in-the northeast area of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Additionally, improvements to East Avenue from Wilson Avenue southerly to the existing terminus of East Avenue are proposed. In response to concerns regarding the environmental impacts associated with the original design and the resulting costs of mitigating those impacts, the project has been revised from that which was originally described in the Draft EIR. The revised project scope, the associated environmental impacts and mitigation measures are described in Chapter V, Section C.3., Alternative C "Reduced Improvement" of the Final EIR. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga that Public Resources Section 21081 and CEQA Guidelines Section 15091 require that no public agency shall approve or carry out any project for which an EIR has been completed which identifies one or more significant adverse environmental effects, unless the public agency makes one or more written findings for each of those significant effect, accompanied by a brief explanation of the rationale for each finding. Accordingly, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga makes the following findings for the project: CEQA requires the adoption of written findings of fact for each significant environmental impact that (1) the project has been changed (including the adoption of mitigation measures) to avoid or substantially reduce the magnitude of the impact; (2) changes to the project are within another agency's jurisdiction and have been or should be adopted; or (3) specific economic, social, legal, technical, or other considerations make mitigation measures infeasible. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has determined that the Project may have the potentially significant impacts identified below. All feasible mitigation measures have been incorporated into the Project and are set forth below. The City Council has determined that these mitigation measures will avoid or substantially reduce the magnitude of the following potential impacts: A. Land Use 1. Impacts The project is consistent with the City General Plan, including Circulation and Land Use Elements 2. Findin Project impacts on Land Use are less than significant. Cumulative P116 Proposed mitigation measure will reduce project-related impacts to a less. than significant level. RESOLUTION NO. December 21, 2011 Page 3 CUMU-1. Consistent with current practices, the City will review each individual development proposal to ensure that every development project incorporates features, which minimize potential land use conflicts between proposed and existing uses. Conditions of approval will be prepared and enforced to achieve this objective. B. Biological Resources Impacts Proiect Specific The predominant vegetation existing on the project site at the time of the survey was characterized by Holland community types which are indicated by species dominance. Riversidean alluvial fan sage scrub (RAFSS) and non-native ruderal were two Holland community types noted in the project area. RAFSS is a regionally significant habitat type generally confined to river and creek floodplains of southern San Bernardino and northwest Riverside counties. RAFSS provides habitat for a variety pf wildlife species, most of which are common, widespread and observed in several community types. RAFSS habitat type also supports a wide variety of regionally sensitive flora and fauna which are unique to this region. Approximately 40% of the project site is comprised of highly disturbed RAFSS community. Finding: The mitigation measures will reduce project-related impacts to biological resources to a less than significant level. 3. Mitigation: Proiect Specific BIO-1 Consultation shall occur between the City and the Army Corps of Engineers (ALOE) as well as the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) to determine the permitting requirements for the project. The City will comply with any additional considerations imposed on the project applicant in the permit, agreement and certification. BIO-2 Post-construction activities shall result in the restoration, enhancement and protection of the remaining existing habitat. BIO-3 A Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) is required. Said SWPPP shall identify methods to be utilized to protect water quality during construction of the project. BIO-4. Prior to any incidental take of a federally listed species, the developer will obtain a section 10(a) permit or enter into Section 7 consultation with the USFWS, or comply with the terms of regional 10(a) ESA permit. Additionally, prior to any incidental take of a state-listed species, the developer will obtain a section 2081 permit from the California Department of Fish and Game. P717 RESOLUTION NO. December 21, 2011 Page 4 BIO-5. A qualified biologist shall be retained as a construction monitor to ensure that incidental construction impacts on biological resources are avoided. The monitor shall: onduct pre-grading field surveys for special-status plant and wildlife species • that may be impacted as a result of construction and/or site preparation activities; ttend pre-grading meetings with the contractor to ensure that the timing and location of construction activities do not conflict with mitigation requirements including seasonal surveys for plants and wildlife and avoidance of preserved native areas; ~rk the construction area adjacent to preserved native areas in the field with the contractor in accordance with the final approved grading plan; and Periodically visit the site during construction to coordinate and monitor compliance with the above mitigation measures. BIO-6. Prior to construction or site preparation activities in an area during the nesting season of native bird species potentially nesting on the site, a field survey shall be conducted by a qualified biologist to determine whether active nests of special-status, or common bird species protected by the Migratory Bird Treaty Act and the California Fish and Game Code are present in the construction zone or within 50 feet (300 feet for raptors) of the construction zone. If active nests of protected birds are found, a fence barrier shall be erected around the nest site at a distance as determined by the biologist. No construction activities shall be permitted within this nest zone until the young birds have fledged, as determined by the biologist. BIO-7. Immediately prior to construction or grading activities in an area, a qualified biologist to determine whether individuals of coastal California gnatcatcher occur within the construction or grading zone shall conduct a habitat assessment survey. If located, gnatcatchers shall be captured and translocated unharmed into areas of appropriate habitat (either on-site or immediately offsite) that are not subject to disturbance The following mitigation measures specifically address the reduced impacts associated with Alternative C, as described in Chapter V, Section D. 3. of this document BIO-8' Temporary impacts of 2.5 acres to SBKR habitat will be mitigated at a 1:1 ratio by means of on-site, post-construction restoration. BIO-g" Permanent impacts of 1.50 acres to SBKR habitat will be mitigated at a 2:1 ratio by means of purchase of 3.0 acres from an approved mitigation land bank. P118 BIO-10' Temporary impacts of 0.15 acres to jurisdictional waters of the U.S. will be mitigated at a 1:1 ratio via SAWA or the Inland Empire Resource Conservation District. RESOLUTION NO. December 21, 2011 Page 5 BIO-11' Permanent impacts of 0.07 acres to jurisdictional waters of the U.S. will be mitigated at a 2:1 ratio (0.14 acres) via SAWA or the Inland Empire Resource Conservation District. C. Geology 1. Impacts Project Specific Regional Geologic Setting As does the entire City of Rancho Cucamonga, the project site is situated on a gently sloping alluvial plain that is part of a single geologic unit known as the "Perris Structural Block." This plain is composed of alluvial or stream-carried materials deposited by the streams and water courses flowing out of the San Gabriel Mountains just north of the City. Slope Stability The project site and surrounding environs are not subject to landslides or slope failure. Faulting A discussion of faults in California should be prefaced with a discussion of legislation and state policies concerning the classification and land use criteria associated with faults: By definition of the State Mining and Geology Board, an active fault is a fault, which has had an earthquake or surface displacement within Holocene time (about the last 11,000 years). The State Geologist has defined a ootentially active fault as any fault considered to have been active during Quaternary time (last 2,000 years). This definition is used in delineating Special Studies Zones as mandated by the Alquist-Priolo Geologic Hazards Zones Act of 1972 and subsequently in 1975. The intent of this act is to assure that urban development does not occur across the traces of active faults. The subject site is not included within a special studies zone defined by the Alquist-Priolo Act. Seismicity The site can be considered a very active seismic area, as is all of Southern California. Active earthquake faults that could directly impact the project site include the San Andreas Fault, Cucamonga Fault, San Jose Fault, Sierra Madre Fault and Red Hill Fault. These faults are not within or adjacent to the project site and the site is not included within an Alquist-Priolo Special Studies Zone. The possibility of severe ground shaking is considered high over the next 50 to 100 years. The most severe seismic shaking would originate from the Cucamonga or Red Hill Faults. The estimated maximum accelerations from a maximum credible earthquake of Richter Magnitude 7.0 on the Cucamonga Fault would range from approximately 0.60 P119 P120 RESOLUTION NO. December 21, 2011 Page 6 to 0.95. On the Red Hill Fault with a maximum credible earthquake of Richter Magnitude 6.5, the estimated maximum accelerations would range from approximately 0.70 to 0.80. 2. Finding The mitigation measures will reduce project-related impacts to geological resources to a less than significant level. 3. Mitigation Project Specific GEO-1 Standard grading and compaction technologies and compliance with current grading requirements as required by the City of Rancho Cucamonga will mitigate any constraints caused by exposure to fault displacement and ground surface structure to the extent practicable. GEO-2 All cut and fill slopes shall be landscaped with drought tolerant slope-stabilizing vegetation as soon as possible after grading to minimize erosion potential. Irrigation and maintenance shall be the responsibility of the applicant. Provisions to facilitate drainage away from tops of slopes and slope faces should be provided in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Grading Policy and Guidelines. GEO-3 Grading will be restricted during the rainy season (December-March) to reduce erosion potential and potential sediment transport problems GEO-4 Should fill be proposed in the drainage courses present at the site, the impact of subsurface water accumulating in these depressions may be mitigated by providing adequate subdrainage. D. Hazardous Materials 1. Impact The project site is composed of a raised earthen roadbed that crosses the watershed of Etiwanda Creek. Etiwanda Creek Channel as well as a number of drainage pipes exist under the roadbed and convey flows from north to south Potential problems posed by the presence of hazardous or toxic materials to onsite or offsite locations are minimal due to the limited area of developed property adjacent to the project site, and the absence of reported storage, utilization, or disposal of hazardous materials on or the vicinity of the project site. It should be noted here that vehicle maintenance procedures commonly implemented during some grading operations have the potential to release hazardous materials. Precautions shall be taken to prevent the release of used motor oil, hydraulic fluid, and/or other hazardous materials to the ground during any future grading operations. These fluids should be stored in containers (such as 55 gallon drums) until they can be trarisported offsite for proper disposal or recycling. P121 RESOLUTION NO. December 21, 2011 Page 7 2. Finding The mitigation measures will reduce project-related impacts to a less than significant level. 3. Mitigation HAZ-1. During the anticipated grading of the property, observations should be made for the presence of toxic or hazardous materials. Should evidence of contamination be identified, further investigations may be required. E. Noise 1. Impact Short-Term Impacts Construction-related noise will result in changes in ambient noise levels. Impacts are considered short-term since noise will cease upon completion of construction activity. Noise generated by construction equipment, including trucks, graders, bulldozers, concrete mixers, and portable generators, can reach significant levels ranging from 70 dBA to 105 dBA. Level of impact will depend upon several factors, such as: 'the distance between construction activity and sensitive receptors, the types of equipment used, and the hours of construction operations. The duration and intensity of construction-related noise is regulated by the City through time limits on grading and other heavy equipment operations. Compliance with these limits is generally presumed to create a less than significant impact. Site preparation, grading, and construction activities will take place only during daylight hours, or as otherwise permitted by City local regulations and practices, including various restrictions such as time limits on construction involving the operation of powered equipment. All construction-related equipment, either fixed or mobile will be equipped with properly operating and maintained muffler exhaust systems. Stationary equipment will be situated in a manner that will direct emitted noise away from noise sensitive receptors. To protect the health of persons employed at construction sites, hearing protection equipment will be worn in compliance with regulations established by the California Occupational Safety and Health Administration. Long-Term Impacts Upon completion, project-related traffic will cause an incremental increase in area-wide noise levels throughout the area. Long-term noise concerns from the increased urbanization of the project area center primarily on mobile source generators on area roadways. P122 RESOLUTION NO. December 21, 2011 Page 8 For much of the project site, mitigation of noise is feasible with use of standard mitigation. With the incorporation of the proposed mitigation measures, the project will be consistent with City General Plan noise standards. 2. Finding Implementation of these measures will substantially lessen the short-term impacts. Long-term noise impacts will be less-than-significant levels. The proposed project will contribute incrementally to a cumulative increase in area-wide noise levels. 3. Mitigation NOI-1. Construction operations, which produce the highest levels of noise, shall, to the extent practical, be arranged to occur together in the construction program in order to avoid continuing periods of greater annoyance. Cumulative The proposed project, combined with anticipated urbanization of the region is expected to greatly increase vehicular traffic in the area. In particular, noise levels along Wilson Avenue will be elevated. To mitigate potentially cumulatively significant impacts from noise to a level of insignificance, the following specific mitigation measures will be implemented: CUMU-2 Establish time limit on hours of construction, per City Code. CUMU-3 Require all construction related equipment, either fixed or mobile to be equipped with properly operating and maintained muffler exhaust systems. CUMU-4 Require stationary equipment to be situated in a manner that will direct emitted noise away from noise sensitive receptors. CUMU-5 Arrange construction operations, which produce the highest levels of noise to occur together in the construction program in order to avoid continuing periods of greater annoyance. CUMU-6 Incorporation of buffer distances and noise propagation barriers in areas where construction noise levels may exceed noise thresholds F. Cultural Resources 1. Impacts ' Pfoiect Specific 2. Findings RESOLUTION NO. December 21, 2011 Page 9 The project will not result in significant adverse impacts to known cultural, archeological, historical or paleontological resources. Mitigation Measure CR-1 will reduce potential impacts to unknown resources discovered during the construction phases of the project. 3. Mitigation CR-1. Should buried cultural materials be encountered during any earth-moving operations associated with the project, all work in that area shall be halted or diverted until a qualified archeologist can evaluate the nature and significance of the resources found. Cumulative The City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department reviews proposed projects to ensure significant cultural resources are protected. This process is designed to ensure that significant cultural resources, such as historic sites, buildings, objects, and archeological sites are avoided, preserved or salvaged prior to development, as appropriate. In addition, since sub-surface artifacts may be present on any site, State requirements call for a qualified archeologist to be on-call for construction monitoring and evaluation of any artifacts unearthed. during construction activities. In consultation with other appropriate agencies, the City develops mitigation measures appropriate for each project. Development of the region could result in adverse impacts to known archeological and historical resources. It may also result in the discovery of previously unknown resources via grading and other land-disturbing activities involved in construction. Increasing populations in the area, as a result of urbanization, are likely to cause adverse effects to existing resources through vandalism, illegal collecting, and human presence. It is assumed incremental project impacts will contribute cumulatively to adverse impacts to cultural resources in the region, but not to a level of significance. CUMU-8 Development will avoid damaging effects on archaeological resources. For resources in which avoidance is not feasible, mitigation will be provided as recommended by the archaeologist and as described in Supplementary document J of the CEQA Guidelines. In general, these guidelines require the following: a. Preservation of sites in place as the preferred manner of avoiding damage to historic and prehistoric resources. b. Stopping of excavation in the event of discovery of human remains until the Coroner has determined that no investigation of the cause of death is required; or, if descendants have made a recommendation of the property owner regarding proper disposal of the remains, or until descendants have failed to make a recommendation within 24 hours of notification. If no recommendation is received, remains will be interred with appropriate dignity on the property in a location not subject to further development. P123 RESOLUTION NO. December 2l, 2011 Page 10 CUMU-9 Any brush removal and/or surface disturbing activity (soils or geologic testing, or clearing in preparation for grading) near all alluvial areas shall be monitored by a qualified archaeologist. Should archaeological material appear during this work, the archaeologist shall be empowered to halt or redirect the clearing or grading until appropriate archaeological recovery can be made. CUMU-10 Excavation in areas likely to contain paleontological resources will be monitored by a qualified vertebrate paleontological monitor. This monitor will be empowered to halt construction activities as necessary to protect any resources uncovered. CUMU-11 For identified unique archeological resources, Phase II testing/evaluation will be completed. This testing will include supplemental mapping, surface collections, subsurface excavations, and recovery of samples. If results indicate the resources are significant, a mitigation plan to lessen adverse impacts will be implemented. The testing of these sites must be completed prior to the issuance of any grading permit(s). If any of the sites are found to be significant and avoidance is not possible, Phase III investigations (data recovery) will be performed. All efforts to be undertaken in conjunction with local tribes. CUMU- 12 The historical sites within project areas will be tested prior to issuance of any grading permit(s). Efforts will be made to avoid and/or minimize effects to historical sites deemed significant. If any sites deemed significant that will be impacted by the project, Phase II testing (and where necessary, Phase III investigations) must be completed. CUMU-13 Where appropriate, impacts to historical structures will be minimized by moving the site(s) to preservation site(s) within the study area. Public Services and Facilities G. Transportation and Circulation 1. Impacts Project Specific Wilson Avenue will eventually be a continuous route. Today, there is a gap or missing link in its mid-section. The proposed project will contribute to Wilson Avenue completing a local circulation link in the City's General Plan. 2. Findin The net impact on traffic and circulation will be less than significant. 3. Mitigation TR-1 Sight distance at each study area intersection should be reviewed with respect to California Department of Transportation/City of Rancho Cucamonga standards in conjunction with the preparation of final grading, landscaping, and street improvement plans. P124 RESOLUTION NO. December 21, 2011 Page 11 TR-2 Traffic signing and striping should be implemented in conjunction with detailed construction plans for the project. TR-3 As is the case for any roadway design, the City of Rancho Cucamonga should periodically review traffic operations in the vicinity of the project once the project is constructed to assure that the traffic operations are satisfactory. Cumulative Area wide growth, as well as approved future developments within the study area, has been accounted for within the Comprehensive Transportation Plan Model maintained by the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG). For Year 2020 traffic conditions without the project, levels of service for study area intersections vary from LOS A to LOS F. For Year 2020 conditions with the project, but without off-site improvements, conditions vary from LOS A to LOS F. For Year 2020 traffic conditions with the proposed development and with off-site improvements, conditions are projected to operate at LOS C/D or better during peak morning and evening hours. Proposed mitigation measures will reduce project-related impacts to a less than significant level. CUMU-14 As a means of mitigating the cumulative, significant regional traffic impacts associated with buildout within the study area, the project traffic engineer has developed a recommended circulation system. This system will allow virtually all road segments to operate at LOS C or better. Additional measures, as provided in Chapter IV, Section A, will also be necessary to minimize cumulative impacts to circulation. H. Fire Protection Services 1. Impact Implementation of the proposed project, incorporating standard mitigation measures as identified herein, will not result in any adverse or significant impact on fire protection and emergency services and will not be in conflict with City General Plan Policies pertaining to fire protection and emergency services. The project, by making improvements to East Avenue north to Wilson Avenue and improvements to Wilson Avenue eastward to Wardman Bullock Road, will improve the ability of fire protection services to respond timely by establishing a direct link to Wilson Avenue and providing access to the east from the existing fire station on East Avenue. 2. Finding Incorporation and implementation of mitigation measure FPS-1 will reduce project impacts to fire protection services to below the level of significance. P125 3. Mitigation RESOLUTION NO. December 21, 2011 Page 12 FPS-1 All project street widths, grades and turning curve radii will be designed to allow access by fire suppression vehicles and will be subject to the approval of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Fire Department. FPS-2 Fire hydrant locations will be in compliance with City Fire Department standards and requirements. FPS-3 Fire flow requirements, including flow, quantities, pressure and duration consistent with City Fire Department standards and specifications, will be incorporated into overall project design. FPS-4 All water mains and fire hydrants providing required fire flows will be constructed in accordance with the City Fire Department. A. Air Quality - Proiect Specific and Cumulative 1. Impacts Short-Term (Construction )Impacts Temporary impacts will result from project construction activities. Air pollutants will be emitted by construction equipment, and dust will be generated during grading and site preparation. Dust is normally the primary concern during grading and construction of new buildings and infrastructure. Because such emissions are not easily collected or controlled, they are called "fugitive emissions." Emission rates vary as a function of many parameters, such as soil silt, soil moisture, wind speed, area disturbed, number of vehicles, depth of disturbance, etc.). Long-Term (Operational) Impacts The project will contribute to the regional inability to attain the ozone standard based on SCAQMD's recommended significance levels. The mobile source emissions from project implementation may create a potentially significant air quality impact. Vehicle exhaust may impact air quality immediately adjacent to roadway travel lanes, particularly during periods of maximum traffic congestion and minimum atmospheric dispersion. Project Impacts on Attainment of State Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reduction Targets The project under consideration will not in of itself achieve any reduction in greenhouse gases in that it will not complete the link between Etiwanda Avenue and Wardman Bullock Road. P726 It should be noted that the completion of Wilson Avenue improvements will reduce vehicle miles traveled and thus incrementally assist in .the reduction of GHG and other P127 RESOLUTION NO. December 21, 2011 Page 13 air pollutants. The proposed project can be considered a phase of the overall improvement project of improvements from Etiwanda Avenue to Wardman Bullock Road. 2. Finding The mitigation measures will lessen project-related impacts to air quality. However, some temporary construction-related impacts (such as fugitive dust emissions) and operational impacts (mobile source emissions) would exceed the applicable SCAOMD thresholds of significance. Overall,-the project will result in significant adverse impacts to air quality. Approval of the project will .require a Statement of Overriding Considerations for air quality impacts. Even with compliance with existing regulations and development requirements, the incremental increase in average daily pollutant emissions from mobile sources as a result of this project will contribute to significant and unavoidable impacts. Incremental project impacts will also contribute cumulatively to the regional non-attainment of AOMD air quality standards and improvement goals for some pollutants. The City will be required to adopt a Statement of Overriding Considerations. 3. Mitigation AO-1. Reduce inefficient circulation movements and thus reduce emissions by minimizing construction interference with regional non-project traffic movement through measures such as: a. Scheduling receipt of construction materials during non-peak travel hours. b. Routing construction traffic through areas least sensitive to impacts. c. Limiting lane closures and detours to off-peak travel periods. d. Providing ride-share incentives for contractor and subcontractor. personnel. AO-2. Reduce "spill-over" effects by preventing soil erosion, washing vehicles entering public roadways from off-road project areas, and washing/sweeping project access to public roadways on an adequate schedule. AO-3. Limiting gradinglsoil disturbances to as small an area as practical at any one time. Cumulative The proposed project and other planned and anticipated development within the cumulative project area will contribute to the pollutant load in the Southern California air basin. Pollutant emissions will result from construction activity and, in the long term, from vehicle use and the burning of fuels for heating, cooking, lighting, etc. CUMU-7 Air pollution reduction programs contained in the City's Air Quality Element, and programs and regulations enforced by the SCAOMD, will be applied to all future development projects. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga that it has considered the following alternatives identified in the EIR in light of the environmental RESOLUTION NO. December 21, 2011 Page 14 impacts which cannot be avoided or substantially lessened and has rejected those alternatives as infeasible for the reasons hereinafter stated: A. No Build Alternative 1. Seismic Safety -The implementation of Alternative A would not affect the conditions and potential for seismic activity in the area of the project. 2. Soils, Slopes and Erosion - Alternate A would not result in a significant increase or decrease in to soils, slopes and erosion would not be significantly different. 3. Wind Erosion -Implementation of Alternative A would not result in significant changes to the impacts associated with the project as proposed. 4. Flooding, Drainage and Dam Inundation -While Alternative A would reduce the amount of impervious development on the project site, it would not significantly alter the impacts of flooding, drainage and dam inundation from those impacts identified with the proposed project. 5. Noise - No development would result in less noise impacts on the existing residents of the immediate area, but would maintain existing noise impacts along current circulation routes such as Banyan. 6. Air Quality -The implementation of Alternative A would result in an increase in the impacts to air quality as a result of maintaining the higher levels of vehicle- miles-traveled that currently exist. 7. Water Quality - Alternative A would not result in significant changes to the impacts identified from the proposed project. 8. Water Supply - No development would reduce impacts on water supply facilities. 9. Toxic Substances - No significant changes to the impacts associated with the project as proposed. 10. Open Space and Conservation - Alternate A would avoid encroachment into the conservation easement that results with the proposed project. This impact is not. considered significant and thus, the impacts to open space and conservation would not be significantly different. 11. Agriculture - No significant changes to the impacts associated with the project as proposed. 12. Biological Resources -This alternative would avoid any impacts to biological resources. 13. Energy Resources -The implementation of Alternative A does not achieve the City's objectives to reduce consumption of energy resources and would result in an increase in the consumption of energy resources in that easUwest bound P128 Pt29 RESOLUTION NO. December 21, 2011 Page 15 traffic would continue to be required to divert to the north or south, resulting in an increase in Vehicle Miles Traveled. 14. Scenic Highways - No significant .changes to the impacts associated with the project as proposed. 15. Cultural Resources - Alternative A would avoid any impacts to cultural resources associated with the project as proposed. 16. Mineral Resources - No significant changes to the impacts associated with the project as proposed. 17. Light and Glare -The implementation of Alternative A would result in a decrease in light and glare in the immediate area. Public Services and Facilities Element: 1. Traffic and Circulation -The implementation of Alternative A would not achieve the City's objectives to provide an efficient traffic and circulation system and would result in an incremental increase in adverse impacts to traffic and circulation systems by eliminating the ability to complete the connection of currently non-existent sections of Wilson Avenue, causing traffic to divert to the north or south and thus impacting those facilities and intersections. 2. Schools - Alternative A would not result in a significantly different impact to schools and school facilities. 3. Libraries -The implementation of Alternative A would not result in a significantly different impact to library facilities. 4. Law Enforcement -Alternative A would eliminate a more direct vehicular connection to East Avenue and Wardman Bullock Road and thus prohibit a reduction in efficient access and response times of law enforcement. 5. Fire Protection - Alternative A would eliminate a more direct vehicular connection to East Avenue and Wardman Bullock Road and thus prohibit a reduction in efficient access and response times of fire protection services. 6. Parks and Recreation - Alternative A would not result in a significantly different impact to parks and recreation facilities. 7. Solid Waste -The implementation of Alternative A would not result in a significantly different impact to solid waste facilities. 8. Health Services - Alternative A would not result in a significantly different impact to health services and facilities. 9. Water and Sewer -The implementation of Alternative A would not result in significantly different impacts on water service facilities and no impact on wastewater treatment facilities. 10. Electricity - Alternative A would not result in a significantly different impact to electricity service and facilities. RESOLUTION NO. December 21, 2011 Page 16 11. Natural Gas - Alternative A would not result in a significantly different impact to natural gas service and facilities. 12. Telephone - Alternative A would not result in a significantly different impact to telephone service and facilities. 13. Television - Alternative A would not result in a significantly different impact to television service and facilities. 14. Housing Element -The implementation of Alternative A would not have any impacts to the housing opportunities that would result from the proposed project. 15. Conclusion: Alternative A, (No Build) is considered an environmentally inferior alternative in that while some impacts are generally reduced incrementally from the impacts resulting from the proposed project, the adverse impact to traffic and circulation resulting by not building this segment of Wilson Avenue would be significant and would more than offset any environmental gains achieved by Alternative A. Additionally, implementation of Alternative A would mean that the project's primary objectives would not be achieved. B. Expanded Banyan Route Alternative Public Health and Safety: 1. Seismic Safety -The implementation of Alternative B would not affect the conditions and potential for seismic activity in the area of the project. 2. Soils, Slopes and Erosion - Alternate B would not result in a significant increase or decrease into soils, slopes and erosion would not be significantly different. 3. Wind Erosion -Implementation of Alternative B would not result in significant changes to the impacts associated with the project as proposed. 4. Flooding, Drainage and Dam Inundation - Alternative B would not significantly alter the impacts of flooding, drainage and dam inundation from those impacts identified with the proposed project. 5. Noise - Alternative B would result in less noise impacts on the existing residents of the immediate project site but increased noise levels in the Banyan area. 6. Air Quality -The implementation of Alternative B would result in an increase in the impacts to air quality as a result of maintaining the higher levels of vehicle- miles-traveled that currently exist. 7. Water Quality - Alternative B would not result in significant changes to the impacts identified from the proposed project. 8. Water Supply - Alternative B would reduce impacts on water supply facilities. P130 P131 RESOLUTION NO. December 21, 2011 Page 17 9. Toxic Substances - Alternative B would not result in significant changes to the impacts associated with the project as proposed. 10. Open Space and Conservation - Alternate B would avoid the encroachment into the conservation easement that results with the proposed project. This impact is not considered significant and thus, the impacts to open space and conservation would not be significantly,different. 11. Agriculture - Alternative B would not result in significant changes to the impacts associated with the project as proposed. 12. Biological Resources -The proposed project does not result in significant impacts to biological resources and the impacts to biological resources associated with Alternative B would not be significantly different. 13. Energy Resources -The implementation of Alternative B would not achieve the City's objective to reduce consumption of energy resources and would result in an increase in the consumption of energy resources in that east/west bound traffic would continue to be required to divert to the north or south, resulting in an increase in Vehicle Miles Traveled. 14. Scenic Highways - No significant changes to the impacts associated with the project as proposed. 15. Cultural Resources - No significant changes to the impacts associated with the project as proposed 16. Mineral Resources - No significant changes to the impacts associated with the project as proposed. 17. Light and Glare -The implementation of Alternative B would result in a decrease in light and glare in the immediate area, but increased light and glare in the Banyan area. Public Services and Facilities: 1. Traffic and Circulation -The implementation of Alternative B would not achieve the City's objectives to provide an efficient traffic and circulation system and would result in an incremental increase in adverse impacts to traffic and circulation systems by eliminating the ability to complete the connection of currently non-existent sections of Wilson Avenue, causing traffic to divert to the north or south and thus impacting those facilities and intersections. 2. Schools - Alternative B would not result in a significantly different impact to schools and school facilities. 3. Libraries -The implementation of Alternative B would not result in a significantly different impact to library facilities. RESOLUTION NO. December 21, 2011 Page 18 4. Law Enforcement -Alternative 8 would eliminate a more direct vehicular connection to East Avenue and Wardman Bullock Road and thus prohibit a reduction in efficient access and response times of law enforcement. 5. Fire Protection - Alternative B would eliminate a more direct vehicular connection to East Avenue and Wardman Bullock Road and thus prohibit a reduction in efficient access and response times of fire protection services. 6. Parks and Recreation -Alternative 6 would not result in a significantly different impact to parks and recreation facilities. 7. Solid Waste -The implementation of Alternative B would not result in a significantly different impact to solid waste facilities. 8. Health Services - Alternative B would not result in a significantly different impact to health services and facilities. 9. Water and Sewer -The implementation of Alternative B would result in a decrease in the impacts on water service facilities and no impact on wastewater treatment facilities. 10. Electricity - Alternative B would not result in a significantly different impact to electricity service and facilities. 11. Natural Gas -Alternative B would not result in a significantly different impact to natural gas service and facilities. 12. Telephone - Alternative B would not result in a significantly different impact to telephone service and facilities. 13. Television - Alternative B would not result in a significantly different impact to television service and facilities. 14. Housing Element -The implementation of Alternative B would not have any impacts to the housing opportunities that would result from the proposed project. 15. Conclusion: Alternative B, (Expanded Banyan) is considered an envirorimentally superior alternative in that some impacts are reduced incrementally from the impacts resulting from the proposed project. Additionally, the impact to traffic and circulation resulting by the expansion of the capacity of Banyan would result in a superior circulation system than Alternative A. P732 Implementation of Altemative B would mean that the project's primary objectives would not be achieved. RESOLUTION NO. December 21, 2011 Page 19 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga that it has considered the following alternative identified in the EIR in light of the environmental impacts which cannot be avoided or substantially lessened and has revised the project scope as identified in Chapter V, Section C.3. Alternative C, of the Final EIR for the reasons hereinafter stated: C. Reduced Improvement Alternative Public Health and Safety: 1. Seismic Safety -The implementation of Alternative C would not affect the conditions and potential for seismic activity in the area of the project. 2. Soils, Slopes and Erosion - Alternate C would not result in a significant increase or decrease in to soils, slopes and erosion would not be significantly different. 3. Wind Erosion -Implementation of Alternative C would not result in significant changes to the impacts associated with the project as proposed. 4. Flooding, Drainage and Dam Inundation - Alternative C would not significantly alter the impacts of flooding, drainage and dam inundation from those impacts identified with the proposed project. 5. Noise - Alternative C would result in incrementally less noise impacts on the existing residents of the immediate project site. 6. Air Quality -The implementation of Alternative C would result in a decrease in the impacts to air quality as a result of reducing vehicle-miles-traveled that currently exist. 7. Water Quality - Alternative C would not result in significant changes to the impacts identified from the proposed project. 8. Water Supply - Alternative C would reduce impacts on water supply facilities. 9. Toxic Substances - No significant changes to the impacts associated with the project as proposed. 10. Open Space and Conservation -The alignment of Wilson Avenue proposed as Alternative C will avoid the conservation easement and thus have no impact on the conservation easement. 11. Agriculture - No significant changes to the impacts associated with the project as proposed. 12. Biological Resources - Alternative C will reduce impacts to biological resources existing on the project site. P733 . RESOLUTION NO. December 21, 2011 Page 20 13. Energy Resources -The implementation of Alternative C would result in a decrease in the existing consumption of energy resources in that easUwest bound traffic would be able to utilize this direct connection and thus Vehicle Miles Traveled would be reduced. 14. Scenic Highways - No significant changes to the impacts associated with the project as proposed. 15. Cultural Resources - No significant changes to the impacts associated with the project as proposed 16. Mineral Resources - No significant changes to the impacts associated with the project as proposed. 17. Light and Glare -The implementation of Alternative C would result in a decrease in light and glare in the immediate area, but increased light and glare in the Banyan area. Public Services and Facilities Element: 1. Traffic and Circulation -The implementation of Alternative C would result in a positive impact to traffic and circulation system in the project area by completing the connection of the currently non-existent sections of Wilson Avenue and East Avenue, allowing traffic to utilize this direct east-west connection, although at a reduced capacity from the project as originally proposed and described within this document. 2. Schools - Alternative C would not result in a significantly different impact to schools and school facilities. 3. Libraries -The implementation of Alternative C would not result in a significantly different impact to library facilities. 4. Law Enforcement - Alternative C would provide a direct vehicular connection to East Avenue and Wardman Bullock Road and thus maintain efficient access and a reduction in response times of law enforcement. 5. Fire Protection - Alternative C would provide a more direct vehicular connection to East Avenue and Wardman Bullock Road and thus maintain efficient access and a reduction in response times of fire protection services. 6. Parks and Recreation - Alternative C would not result in a significantly different impact to parks and recreation facilities. P734 7. Solid Waste -The implementation of Alternative C would not result in a significantly different impact to solid waste facilities. RESOLUTION NO. December 21, 2011 Page 21 8. Health Services - Alternative C would not result in a significantly different impact to health services and facilities. 9. Water and Sewer -The implementation of Alternative C would result in an incremental decrease in the impacts on water service facilities and no impact on wastewater treatment facilities. 10. Electricity - Alternative C would not result in a significantly different impact to electricity service and facilities. 11. Natural Gas - Alternative C would not result in a significantly different impact to natural gas service and facilities. 12. Telephone - Alternative C would not result in a significantly different impact to telephone service and facilities. 13. Television - Alternative C would not result in a significantly different impact to television service and facilities. 14. Housing Element -The implementation of Alternative C would not have any impacts to the housing opportunities that would result from the proposed project. 15. Conclusion: Alternative C (Reduced Improvement Project) is considered an environmentally superior alternative in that some impacts are reduced incrementally from the impacts resulting from the originally proposed project. Specifically, the impact to biological resources would be reduced incrementally as would mitigation costs to the City than those resulting from implementation of the project as originally proposed and described within the Final EIR. Implementation of Alternative C would mean that the project's primary objectives would not be fully achieved. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga that if significant impacts of a Project remain after incorporating mitigation measures, or no measures to mitigate the adverse impacts are identified, it must make a determination that the benefits of the Project outweigh the unavoidable adverse impacts if it is to approve and implement the project. CEQA requires the decision-making agency to balance, as applicable, the economic, legal, social, technological, or other benefits of the Project against its unavoidable adverse environmental risks when determining whether to approve the Project. CEQA Guidelines Section 15093(a). If the specific economic, legal, social, technological or other benefits of the Project outweigh the unavoidable adverse environmental effects, the adverse environmental effects may be considered acceptable. CEQA Guidelines Section 15093(a). The City Council hereby finds that the EIR has identified and discussed significant effects that will occur as a result of the Project. With implementation of the mitigation measures discussed in the EIR, these effects can be mitigated to below a level of significance except for the unavoidable significant impacts to Air Quality discussed herein. Accordingly, a Statement of P135 P136 RESOLUTION NO. December 21, 2011 Page 22 Overriding Considerations has been prepared for the Project's unavoidable significant adverse impacts. This Statement of Overriding Considerations is included as part of the record of the Project approval. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15093(c), the Statement of Overriding Considerations will also be noted in the Notice of Determination for the Project. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga that it has balanced the benefits of the Project against the unavoidable adverse environmental effects thereof. The City Council declares that, having reduced the adverse significant environmental effects of the Project to the extent feasible by recommending the adoption of the proposed mitigation measures; having considered the entire administrative record of the Project; and having weighed the benefits of the Project against its unavoidable adverse impacts after mitigation, the City Council has determined that the following social, economic, and environmental benefits of the Project outweigh the potential unavoidable adverse impacts and render those potential adverse impacts acceptable based upon the following Statement of Overriding Considerations: A. The Project is consistent with the City's General Plan and represents a positive step towards fully implementing the Circulation Element of the General Plan by improving Wilson Avenue and East Avenue as described in the Final EIR. B. The Project will improve emergency fire and police vehicular circulation access in that portion of the City and reduce emergency response times, thus having a positive impact on public safety. C. The Project will improve vehicular circulation to and from the public schools and parks in the immediate area. D. The Project will reduce the vehicle-miles-traveled in the immediate area by providing more direct traffic routes. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga finds that the foregoing benefits provided to the public through the implementation of the Project outweigh the identified significant adverse environmental impacts of the Project which cannot be feasibly avoided or mitigated to below a level of significance. The City Council further finds that each of the Project benefits outweighs the unavoidable adverse environmental effects identified in the Final EIR and therefore finds those impacts to be acceptable. Each of the benefits listed, standing alone, is sufficient justification for the City Council to override the Project's unavoidable environmental impacts. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. that the CEQA Guidelines Section 15126(d) requires an EIR to discuss how a project could directly or indirectly lead to economic, population, or housing growth. A project may be growth-inducing if it removes obstacles to growth, taxes community service facilities or encourages other activities which-cause significant environmental effects. The discussion is as follows: A. Economic. Population or Housing Growth P137 RESOLUTION NO. December 21, 2011 Page 23 The Final EIR proposes the construction of public street Wilson Avenue between East Avenue and Wardman Bullock Road. Additionally, East Avenue will be improved from Wilson Avenue southerly to the current terminus of East Avenue. B. Removal of an Impediment to Growth The implementation of the project resulting in public road improvements would improve public access to the immediate area and thus potentially be growth inducing. C. Precedent-Settino Effects The Project is consistent with the City General Plan, including the Land Use Element and Circulation Element. Surrounding vacant properties are designated for various land uses which will not be affected by implementation of the Project. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga that it has reviewed and considered the EIR, that the EIR is an accurate and objective statement that complies with the California Environmental Quality Act and reflects the City's independent judgment, and that the EIR is incorporated herein by reference. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby APPROVES the written responses to the comments to the Draft EIR, ADOPTS the Statement of Findings pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15091 and Statement of Overriding Considerations pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15093, which are contained herein, CERTIFIES the Final EIR, and ADOPTS the Mitigation Monitoring Plan, which is incorporated herein by reference, based upon the following findings and conclusions: A. Significant environmental impacts have been identified in the Final EIR that will require mitigation as set forth in this resolution but cannot be feasibly avoided or mitigated below a level of significance B. All significant environmental impacts from implementation of the Project have been identified in the Final EIR and, with implementation of the mitigation measures identified, will be mitigated to below a level of significance, except for those impacts listed above that cannot be feasibly avoided or mitigated to below a level of significance. C. Other reasonable alternatives to the Project have been considered and rejected in favor of the Project, or in the case of Alternative C, have been incorporated into the design of the proposed Project as mitigation to the impacts originally identified. D. Environmental, economic, social, public safety and other considerations and benefits derived from implementation of the Project override the identified alternatives to the Project The Final EIR is available for review in the City Clerk's office located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730. Draft EIR Submitted: i Final EIR Submitted: Lead Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California, 91730 Contact: Walt Stickney (909)955-1872 Prepared for the City by: AEI-CASC Consulting, Inc. 934 South Via Lata Street Suite 500 Colton, CA 92324 Contact: Tom Nievez (909)783-0101,x3530 Draft EIR -September, 2011 State Clearinghouse #2008071044 i ~• Wilson Avenue Exteruiorz (East) Draft Environnaentnl Lnpact Report City of Rancho Cucamonga Wilson Avenue Extension (East) Draft Environmental Impact Report Volume I Lead Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California (909)955-1872 Contact: Walt Stickney l• Prepared for the City by: A1JI-CASC Consulting, Inc. 934 South Via Lata Street Colton, CA 92324 (909)783-0101 Contact: Tom Nievez Draft EIR -September, 2011 State Clearinghouse #2008071044 r , ~_J i September 2011 Wilson Avenue Extension (East) City of Rcmclso Cucamonga Draft Environmental Lnpnct Report • TABLE OF CONTENTS Page # u I. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................... .....................I-I A. Purpose of this Document ............................................................................ .....................I-2 B. Standard of Adequacy .................................................................................. .....................I-2 C. Tiering of Documents .................................................................................. .....................I-2 D. Document Format ........................................................................................ .....................I-2 E. Incorporation by Reference .......................................................................... .....................I-3 F. Lead Agency and Responsible Agencies ..................................................... .....................I-4 G. Agencies with Discretionary Approval of Permit Authority ....................... .....................I-4 H. Notice of Preparation (NOP) ....................................................................... .....................I-4 I. Scoping Meeting .......................................................................................... .....................I-4 J. Response to Comments/Final Environnental Impact Report ...................... .....................I-5 K. Mitigation Monitoring Program Matrix ....................................................... ...................I-11 II. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND LAND USE ELEMENT ................... ....................II-1 A. Introduction .......................................................................... ...............II-1 B. Proposed Land Use ................................................................. ...............II-1 C. Existing Conditions ................................................................. ...............II-1 D. Adjacent Existing Land Use and Land Use Compatibility ................... ...............II-1 E. Existing Land Use Regulations ................................................... ...............II-1 F. Tlu~esholds of Significance ...........................:............................ ...............II-2 G. Project Impacts ..................................................................... ...............II-2 H. Cumulative bnpacts ................................................................ ...............II-3 III. RESOURCE MANAGEMENT AND PUBLIC HEALTH & SAFETY ELEMENT........III-I A. Open Space and Conservation .......................................................... .............................III-1 B. Water Resources ............................................................................... ............................. III-4 1. Water Quality ............................................................................. ............................. III-4 2. Drainage and Hydrology ............................................................ ............................. III-6 C. Biological Resources ........................................................................ ............................. III-7 D. Geology and Soils ............................................................................. ...........................III-19 E. Hazardous Materials ......................................................................... ........................... III-21 F. Noise ................................................................................................ ...........................III-22 G. AirQuality ........................................................................................ ...........................III-27 H. Aesthetics .......................................................................................... ...........................III-37 I. Cultural Resources ............................................................................ ........................... III-38 IV. PUBL IC SERVICES AND FACILITIES ELEMENT ............................ .............................IV-1 A. Transportation and Circulation ......................................................... .............................IV-1 B. Public Services .................................................................................. ...........................IV-10 • 1. Scliools .......................................................................................... ...........................IV-10 2. Libraz•ies ........................................................................................ ...........................IV-11 i September 201 l • PVilsas Anerrue L.rlensio» (Ease) Draft Environnaenlal Impucl Reporl City of Rancho Czrcan~onga 3. Law Enforcement ........................................................................ ..............................IV-]2 4. Fire Protection ............................................................................. ..............................IV-12 5. Parks and Recreation ................................................................... ..............................IV-14 6. Solid Waste ................................................................................. ..............................IV-14 7. I-Iealth Services ........................................................................... ..............................IV-1~ C. Uti]ities ........................................................................................... ..............................IV-16 1. Water and Sewer ........................................................................ ..............................IV-16 2. Electricity .................................................................................... ..............................1V-18 3. Natural Gas ................................................................................. ..............................IV-19 4. Telephone .................................................................................... ..............................IV-19 5. Televisiou .................................................................................... ..............................1V-20 V. MANllATORY CEQA TOPICS ............................................................ ................................. V-1 A. Cwnulative Impact Analysis .......................................................... ................................. V-1 B. Significant Irreversible Euviromnental Changes ........................... ............................... V-16 C. Alternatives to The Proposed Project ............................................ ............................... V-17 D. Analysis of Project Alternatives .................................................... ............................... V-19 1. Alternative A: No Build ............................................................. ............................... V-19 2. Alternative B: Expanded Banyan Street ..................................... ............................... V-22 3. Alternative C: Reduced Improvement .............................. ..................... V-25 VI. PERS ONS CONSULTEll ....................................................................... ................................ Vl-1 TABLES Table I-1 Mitigation Monitoring Program Matrix ....................................... .................................I-11 Table III.C-1. Plant Species ................................................................................ ...........................III-9-12 Table III.F.1. Noise/Land Use Compatibility Standards .................................... .............................. III-24 Table IILG-1 Govermnental Air Quality Oversight Responsibilities ............................................... III-30 Table IILH-1. Total Daily Construction Emissions (lb/day) ............................................................ ID-34 Table IILH-3. Total Daily Construction Emissions ........................................................................III-103 Table V.C-l. Comparison of Alternative Impacts .............................................................................. V-18 FIGURES • Figure I-1. Regional Map ....................................................................................................................I-6 ii September 2011 Wilson Avenue Exlensim7 (Ease) Draft Em~ironmental Impac! Report City of Rancho Cucamonga • Figure I-2. Project Location ........................................................................... .....................................I-7 Figure I-3. Aerial Photograph ........................................................................ .....................................I-8 Figure I-4 Project Site Photographs .............................................................. .....................................I-9 Figure I-5. Project Site Photographs .............................................................. ...................................I-10 Figure II-1. General Plan Land Use Designations ................................ .........................II-4 Figure II-2. Circulation Element Map of the General Plan ............................. ....................................II-~ Figure II-3. Aerial Photograph -Existing Land Uses ..................................... ....................................II-6 Figure III-1. Conservation easement ................................................................ .................................. III-2 Figure III-2. Conservation Easement- Road Alignment ................................. ..................................III-3 Figure III-3. Project Biological Impacts ........................................................... ................................III-17 • Figure IV-1 General Plan Circulation Element Map ....................................... ..................................IV-6 Figure IV-2 Roadway Cross-Section ............................................................... ..................................IV-7 Figure V-1 Alternative C Roadway Crass Section ......................................... ................................. V-26 Figure V-2 Alternative C Project Biological Impacts .................................... ................................. V-30 TECHNICAL APPENDICES (Compiled as Volume II) APPENDIX A. Focused San Bernardino Kangaroo Rat Trapping Study ............................ ....... A-1 APPENDIX B. Historical/Archeological Resources Survey Report ..................................... ........B-1 APPENDIX C. Focused Botanical Survey ............................................................................ ........C-1 APPENDIX D. Traffic Impact Analysis ............................................................................... ....... D-I APPENDIX E. Comment Letter/Response to Comment, NOC, NOP, NOP Response ..... ........E-I APPENDIX F. Focused San Bernardino Kangaroo Rat 2011 Trapping Survey .................. ........F-1 • APPENDIX G. Focused Coastal California Gnatcatcher Survey ......................................... ....... G-1 iii Septem ber 20l 1 YVilson Avenue Extension (East) Draft Erzviromnental hnpact Report • I. INTRODUCTION A. PURPOSE OF THIS DOCUMENT City of Rancho Cucamonga The purpose of this Draft Envirormrental Impact Report (DEIR) for the proposed Wilson Avenue is to serve as an informational document for the public agency decision-makers and the general public regarding the potential enviromnental effects of the proposed extension of Wilson Avenue (East) in the City of Rancho Cucamonga (City). This document is required under the California Envirormlental Quality Act, as amended (CEQA), codified in Section 21000 et seq. of the Public Resources Code (PRC), the "Guidelines for the Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act" (Guidelines), codified in Section 15000 et seq. in Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations. CEQA applies to "discretionary projects" proposed to be carried out or approved by public agencies. Similarly, a "project" is defined as: (1) au activity directly undertaken by any public agency including but not limited to public works construction and related activities, enactment and amendment to zoning ordinances, and amendments to general plans or elements thereof; (2) an activity undertaken by a person which is supported in whole or in part tlu-ough public assistance from one or more agencies; (3) an activity involving the issuance to a person of a Lease, permit, license, certificate, or other entitlement for use by one or more public agencies. The City desires to extend improvements of Wilson Avenue (East) that will require a number of discretionary actions both on the part of the Lead Agency and from other agencies, thereby making that development application a "project' subject to CEQA. This DEIR assesses the potential direct, indirect, and cumulative impacts resulting from the proposed development (including construction and subsequent habitation and operation) of the Wilson Avenue Extension (East) project, provides the Lead Agency and the public with detailed information about the effects that the proposed project is likely to have on the enviromnent, lists the ways in which the project's significant effects might be avoided or minimized, and discusses alternatives to the proposed project. The DEIR provides objective and authoritative information in order to assist the Rancho Cucamonga Plamring Commission (Cormnission), Rancho Cucamonga City Council (Council), and the general public in their consideration of the enviromnental consequences associated with the proposed improvements to Wilson Avenue (East). This document is designed to provide the Lead Agency and other Responsible Agencies, the affected public, arrd other interested parties with a sufficient description of the project and its existing environmental setting, present an analysis of how the project may reduce or avoid the project's significant or potentially significant enviromnental effects, and provide a comparative analysis of the impacts associated with a reasonable range of alternatives to that proposed project. If certified, the resulting "Final Enviromnental Impact Report for the Wilson Avenue Extension (East)" (FEIR) will be utilized by the City of Rancho Cucamonga and other public agencies with jw-isdiction over the project or the resources located thereupon to serve as the enviromnental basis for any and all discretionary actions required for the project's unplementation. I-1 September 2011 Wilson Avenue Extension (L'nst) Cily of Rancho Czrcamo~~gn Drafd Envirom~aen/al h»pact Report \J B. STANDARD OF ADEQUACY As required under the Guidelines, an EIR should be prepared with a suffcient degree of analysis to provide decision makers with information, which enables them to make a decision which intelligently takes account of environmental consequences. An evaluation of the envilromneutal effects of a proposed project need not be exhaustive, but the sufficiency of an EIR is to be reviewed in light of what is reasonably feasible. As indicated in Section 15003(1) of the Guidelines, "CEQA does not require technical perfection in an EIR, but rather adequacy, completeness, and agood-faith effort at full disclosure. A court does not pass upon the correctness of an EIR's enviromnental conclusions, but only determines if the EIR is sufficient as an informational document." An EIR is an informational document intended to provide an environmental basis for informed decisions both by the lead agency and by other public agencies from whom later, pernits or approvals concerning a proposed project will or may be required. As a result, the information in an EIR does not dctcrminc the lead agency's decision on a proposed project but provides the environmental information to be considered in reaching that decision. It is the City's intent to provide a sufficient level of analysis to fully address each of the significant or potentially significant impacts resulting from implementation of the Wilson Avenue Extension (East) project. It is the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission and City Council's responsibility, tlu-ough independent analysis and the adequacy of the information presented to make an infom~ed decision, that is, to certify or deny the project The information and prelhninary conclusions contained in this EIR neither reflects nor predetermines the Lead Agency's ultimate decision concerning the proposed project nor the actions of any Responsible or Trustee Agency that may be required to consider the McSweeny Farms project. C. TIERING OF DOCUMENTS As indicated in Section 15152 of the Guidelines, "`[t]iering refers to using the analysis of general matters contained in a broad EIR (such as one prepared for a general plan or policy statement) with later EIRs and negative declarations on narrower projects; incorporating by reference the general discussions from the broader EIR; and concentrating the later EIR or negative declaration solely on the issues specific to the later project. Agencies are encouraged to tier the envirolmlental analysis which they prepare for separate but related projects including general plans, zoning changes, and development projects." D. DOCUDIENT FORDIAT This CEQA document is comprised of the following three (3) separate volumes: • Volume L Draft Environmental Impact Report This volume contains a description of the proposed project, a detailed analysis of the project's potential effects on the environment; a list of mitigation measures recommended by the Lead Agency in response to identifted effects and, a • reasonable range of project alternatives. The DEIR includes, but is not limited to, each of the mandatory components required for an adequate EIR as defined in Sections 15122 through I-2 September 2011. Wilson Avenue Extension (East) City of Rancho Cucamonga Draft Environnaentcd Lr~pact Repor[ 15129 of the Guidelines. This volwne also includes a copy of the Notice of Preparation, including written comments received following dissemination of the NOP. o Volume II: Technical Appendix. This document contains teclwical studies, including cultural, biological and traffic The teclwical studies are provided to allow for independent verification of the information presented and/or to provide the document's reviewers an opportunity to obtain additional information, data, and analysis regarding teclwical issues addressed in those studies. • Volume III: Final Environmental Impact Report. Following dissemination of the DEIR and closure of the comment period established by the City following the publication of the "Notice of Completion", the Lead Agency will prepare detailed written responses to each of the written comments received. These comments and the Lead Agency's drafr responses to those comments will be included in a separately bound document that, upon its preparation, shall constitute an integral component of this E1R. In addition to each of the above referenced documents, this EIR further includes such other documents, exhibits, and related studies as may be identified by the Planning Commission and/or City Council prior to the certification of the Final Environmental Impact Report, if so certified. E. INCORPORATION 6Y REFERENCE • Section 15150 of the Guidelines authorizes EIRs to "incorporate by reference" all or portions of other documents that are a matter of public record and either relate to the proposed project or provide additional information concerning the project's enviromnental setting or impacts. Pursuant to that authority, the following documents and all appendices, attaclwrents, exhibits, and other components of each project's administrative record are hereby "incorporated by reference" and by this reference made a part of this document. • The General Plan of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, the Environmental Impact Report for the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan, the City of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code. F. LEAD AGENCY AND RESPONSIBLE AGENCIES The following agencies and organizations are or may be associated with this project. Each of these entities may be contacted should the reader have any questions or comments concerning any aspect of the proposed project, the enviromnental analysis presented in this EIR, the range of alternatives examined herein, the efficacy of the recommended mitigation measures, and/or the specific role and responsibilities of those agencies and organizations. Iu the preparation of the above list of Responsible Agencies, the Lead Agency has attempted to be inclusive of all discretionary permits and approvals now known to the City and which may be required for the implementation of the Wilson Avenue Extension (East) project. As this plamring and • enviromnental review process progresses, however, other public agencies not listed below may be identified from whom later authorizations are or may be required. I-3 September 2011 Wilson ~3venue Exlension (Bast) City of Rancho Cucamonga Draft E~avironrnental h~rpnct Report The City's failure to list one or more such agencies does not preclude that agency(ies) from utilizing this EIR as the enviromnental basis for a later action(s) and would not necessitate the recirculation of this document merely to identify that agency(ies) or permit authorization(s). Similarly, the identification of an agency as a "potential" Responsible Agency below does not necessarily elevate that agency to that status if no discretionary permits or approvals are ultimately required from that agency. The City of Rancho Cucamonga is serving in the role of Lead Agency for the proposed project. The firm of AEI-CASC Consulting, Inc. and its various sub-consultants, acting under contract to the City, participated in the preparation of this EIR. Key contacts at the City and the consulting firms are listed Chapter 7 of this document. G. Agencies with Discretionary Approval or Permit Authority Pursuant to Section 15367 of the California Envirommrental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, the Ciq~ of R~mcho Cucamono r is the Lead Agency for the project and has principal discretionary authority over the project and project approvals. However, other agencies will serve as Responsible or Trustee Agencies, as provided by section 15381 and 1 X386 of the CEQA Guidelines. Agencies with discretionary approval and/or permit authority over some aspect of the project that may use information in this EIR include, but are not limited to the following: City of Rancho Cucamonga • ~ Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board California Department of Pish and Game South Coast Air Quality Management District San Bernardino County Flood Control District U.S. Army Corps of Engineers U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Agencies, organizations, and individuals are invited to comment on the information presented in this Draft EIR (DEIR). Where possible, persons responding should provide additional information, which they feel, is not contained in the DEIR or should indicate where the information maybe found. H. Notice of Preparation (NOP) A Notice of Preparation (NOP) of this Enviromnental Impact Report was circulated on July 10, 2008. Comments received on the NOP have been considered during the preparation of this document. I. Scoping Meeting Pursuant to Section 21083.9(a)(2) of CEQA, the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a Scoping Meeting for this document on August 7, 2008. The following groups participated in the Scoping Meeting: Local residents Issues identified at the Scoping Meeting are addressed iu this document. I-4 September 2011 • • • Wilson Avenue Extension (Gast) Drcft Environmental Lnpact Report J. Response to Comments, Final EIR City of Rancho Cucamonga Following a 45-day period of circulation and review of the DEIR, the City of Rancho Cucamonga, as Lead Agency, will prepare responses to alb significant enviromnental issues raised in the continents received dw~ing the noticed conunent period. These will be incorporated into a Final EIR that will be considered by the City of Rancho Cucamonga City Council prior to acting on the proposed project. I-~ September 2011 Wilson Avenare Extension (East) Draft Environmental Impact Report City of Rancho Cucamonga • Figure I-l. Regional Map r-..`'- ~`'`~,~ ~ r X11. ,1_ ! \ r ~_ ~~ ., s. ~ ~~ •-._, _r ... . ~ ~~~ '`~~.~ ~ ~ - ~ ~` ~I-215 ~ ' `~' -`.~` ~. t ,~ ~ ,: ~ - .,~+ _ Project Site '.~r ~ ` ~ - - :~ _ ~. Wilson Ave. ,,~ti~ 1, ..,, , ,. r ~~ ;~ Jj r ~ ` 3. .~ 1 _ _ - - -- ~, { ~ !r ~ • I-6 January 2010 • • • Wilson Avenue Extension (East) Draft Envuronmental hnpact Report Figin•e I-2. Project Location City of Rancho Cucamonga 'd c~ ~` ~ ~ ~~ ~ U ~' ~ ~ O _ ~. ~ .--+ ,, ~ ;• t`~~'' -, ~~~~ ~ ~~~ Project Site -_ ~, ._ -. Wilson Avenue __ =i:~~ "-=~ • ,' _ _ ~, - r. 1, py ` 1 iM 1 •• ~_ } t .. -. • •.; • .. .,,.,,,_ ^ -~ ~ ` X27 1:. 2 Q .~ •.! C3 I-7 January 2010 Wilson Avenue Extension (East) Draft Enviro~~rnental Ir1a1~act Report . Figure I-3. Aer1a1 Photograph City of Rancho Ci.~ca~~~onga I-8 January 2010 Wilson Avenue Extension (East) Draft Environmental Impact Report City of Rancho Cucamonga Figure I-4 • Site 4 ~ ~ ~. /~ ( ' "q r '°'~ ~ J. .Y' ~, ,i r ~ i. ~l- ~ j S '~'± I ^~M1 1 ~ j ~ Y ~`.tfix ~ ~ ~ r ~ +~r ~ ,f ~~ ylrf .. ~ ~ ~ ~ / ~ . ~ ~ to r ~ 1 f rl t i .`sY s t' y. ~ 1 _ _ .. _ l _ e . . ,~~ r r _ _ .. ..~ , y ~ f I 1 .n} r t . .. ~ „ ~ t _ .IP..r. ..'j. ~ - .mot. -. .. - .. On existing dirt road , looking we st toward East Avenue •` .- On existing dirt road, looking east toward Wardman Bullock Road I-9 January 2010 Wilson Avenzre Extension (Fast) Draft Environmental Impact Report • Figure I-5 • • '~'La'= City of Rancho Cuccrnzonga At future intersection of Wilson and East Avenue, looking south I-10 January ?010 On existing dirt road, looking east at existing terminus of Wardman Bullock • u • ^. ~. Q O Cr/i o ,, '~ u C$ d G i~ ~ d Q ~ +"' Ate' u ~ i "7~ C o .t'i .~. _% L r G r CA Q-I b O 0 bD i+ '~" w C +C, O O O U"' ~ O mw ~ O yw = O Uw = O ~ .. bp'++ ^~ E o o ~ en ~ , o u on y o ~ on ~ o ~ on ~ ~~ c ~' o ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ o ~ ''~ E o ~ ~0 8 ~ .. a..". cn ~. a ._ on a n. r. on a. w cn a. :° . n n `O a .. s on o c n _ C o C O L a~ ^ w O~ w 0 0 w 0~ O O O :. y ~ w O v cs o ~~ O ~ r~ ~ m a+ E p C' ~s 7 UcCU :s U'~U 'm ~ U='U o ~ UCU d n ro ~ n ~ a ~ cn on on cn T.^ u .. aJ ^_ ^_ ,- .. '' E O O ~, O O w O O w O U w O O '_ _ "'° U" O J O O U f O U c~ C W ~n G' U ~tl T ~- u U r i u o T ~- U T •- U ~ ~ ~ C U C V :~ C U~ U ~s C U~ U m C U~ U c~ > e~ > c~ > c> a i a~ ., a U C '-' i v - a U O- i e> - a U c3 - i e~ .--. U c3 -' U y 'O ' .U. r '~ U ~ ~ U '"'., C c0 rJ U b CD c~ ~ Cn c1 U b oq cd 'U ~ O U ~ O U O U O U iv ~ O ~'"' ~ O G"' O L O ! ^' b0 .. 3 En .. 3 en .~ ~ cn .-~ 3 on ~ N o N ~ y ~ N y 7 v c~ m ~ N C U cC ~ ~ +' 7 U tC ~ m 7 V cd ~ ~ y w - u °~ °: m d O~ C O~ C O T C O~~ FJ .~ C y0 .~ cG y0 .~ iC y0 '~ i6 y0 cn ~ ~, cn m y cn ~ ~, on ~ ~, U '~ ~ U .O ~ U .O ~ U ~~ ~ W E.y ~ 4 t~ O. ~ ~ rl.i ~ F^ °r . . C y7. to ~ -O O ~ ' ~ ° ° ~ U Y p o y ~ v ' ' E o ~ ~ o 3 y ° ~ . .•7 d 3 ~ ~ S ~ T . o ~~2~ ~~¢ ~ ° ~ a ~ , ~oo,~, o 3~- T2- ^o o ^ U ,. T .O Y y ~~ ^ U ~ f- C ^ p , vi ~ V1 z ~a o w ~~ ^~~ ~~r > ~_~ ~~>, ~, ~ ~ O ~ ~ .. O T T ~ ~ N `n o b `" ~ ~ U O ~ N y ~ o 3 f C11 n _ nn U o ~? > ~ U b U .^~ U :. O Q •U ti ~ ~ry .,O3 ~OO~ N ~" y , ~ U~ U ~>C~ U^w Q ^ J W O on o ~ ° ~ ~ o ~ = o~r ~ y 3 U -° ~" o ~ ~ , J n i ~a `a c a 3 a a i a i i~ ~ i _ ~ .~ U U ro ~ ~ U •~ rNii r- ~^ ~ U N J C •-• ~ > ^ ~ C tC U N ~ iC O ~ F w P7 .S ~ -" H v _ ~ ., m ~s -> w o 3 -o o.p o F o ~~ , 0 N a 4 U ,• • ° w ° w o s o O U M y O U M O 7'b ~ O y'D C N C ~ oq n. 0. .= cA R. oq n w o K w o° _T U U ~ T =,' U ~ J ~ C U n:U C U~U 04 ~ c w o ° _ w o ° o ~ ~ o-~^~ U c'U UcGU ~ > ~ > U a> U ttl ~ a> ~ U ~ O O U ~ O U O ! J, O !'.'.' j ~ ~ .3 ~ ~, U ~ ^ ~ U R ~' ~- _ U ~ "~« N ^. y U ~' vi y - .~ y ~ N N O ~ `~ O ~ ~ ~ ' ~ rJ Q ^ ~ c3 y0 Cp 'U vi '~ N rn U U N ~ _ ~ U O w U O~ F a '_' F n. "_' '~ o N 4' ~ c o ~ on ~ ~ -o ° m o ~ ~ ' ~ m 0 >>" m y C U > .^ " U N 4 cC ,~ y ~ 'O Y O W ro r, U y ~ C .. c~' N -^- v' [tl ~ T^.'. U ~ ,~ O C O Q `~ O y U a• ~ V U "-~ W Y m N ~ O~ ~ .~ ~~ O O , . y vi , .O = ~ C p O N m ^ ~ U .O . ay ^ y ~ 0 _ ~ O cC ~ O ~ _ tl N ^ p ~ ~ ro ^ y ~ O T U ~ ~D N O U N y b~ U > . ." '~ _ J O ro 'O _ _ ~ U ^ ~ ~ of N -p w 7 ~ O ~ ~ O ~ d ~ ~ a `~ U .. y w ~ O ~ N itl -p ~ C . V ro i -p U O ~ j > ~ c a+ u1 . . YO ~ i GS - ^ C7 cC ~ .- U U ^. ctl :^ . O N R .. ~ " ^ °i ctl 'O U ~ .°- ^, ~ rJ 'i U ~ U N ~ ~ ~ 3 r ^ - ~ n1 . ^ .9 - ' ~ W + o v - ~ ' ca ati ~. ~ . ~ fJ ^ ' 4? ' ° ' -' + . ` ~ U U ~ ~ m o y o o c ~, ~ ~ o F H ° ~ ^ ~ on ~ ~ m `~ ? o - ~ J -, o ^ a ~ ~ ~ on . r o ^ o `° 2 _ w _ ro ^ d '° H ~ .. _ . -o y ° - o, ? .^ > ° on . ro -° ~ 1 ~ °- ~-° ° ~ o ., _ o := F' ~ ~ ° o ' _ = i ^ = ~ O ° H °' ^ o : ~ Y ~~ = , U : n ro ° w ~ ~ ° ~ , ~ of ~ U v ~ w . c s v i . n . c c ~ r ~ ~. o ~ °' ~, . ~ c ~ a. ~ ~, ~ v ~ ro ~ .'? o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ j ' o ~ ~ ~ ~ . ^ U ~ .. A ~ '~ .~ ~ ~ ~ C V1 > d v' U b U .~ . c . _ ~ e> x _. O N ~ ~ ~ _ O ,_ w ~~ y T N~~ O O N N a R. O ~. • • • c~ 4- .- o a~ w .- o y `-' J o o u o n ~ o u bn ti o u cn„ _ c S y 'o o N b ~ o N~ c. -~. n n. a ~. n 2 a..~- n a ra bn c1 on r~ cn c c • w o° o° w o k i v T •°- v T chi N _. id ~ ~. c~ ~ U~U U~U V a'U o n n n c C C w o° w o ~° w o° i^ U ° G' U ~ .- V _ m c UcGU ro c UcLU _~ c UcLU ~ ~ ~ > > > v ~ ~ v v ~ :o id r _ O r, 'J U ~ Uu., U U ° ~ J O O O ~~ ~ 3~ ^n .3~ cn N ~ Vl ti O VI h ~ VI ~ y ~ ~ L ~ p y^ ~ U c3 ~ ctl u ~ U ro N O a+ ~ U ~ ~ R1 r N ~' vi N -' of ° ?' v~ h ~. N y - N N N _ b O a i 0 O H O O~~ '~ itl O 'y cJ YO '~ ~ O bn O y bn N •n by N en L O Y N ; N p U ~ -~ N ~ y 3 ~ - N '~ O p '0 ~ N '~ ~ N F z °' H n. ~' E- o. °~ p w N O ~ N rr O N ~ ~. b O U ~ ,. -° p cS ~ ~ N .~ y V ~ L ~ O cJ ce C -' T ,u ~ ~-, vl w ~ w O ~ .~+ TJ ~ r1 O ;n ~ ,- O T ~= in 'O .~ - ° ~ N O O N N O r; ,_, O 2 y N r N N ~ ° 'w - ~ > L tp y N ,~, r3 ? ^ O rS ~ "'~ .N- O O .N- ~ p O c3 r0i U O O ro .~ h Y° U N 'fl y «+ O ~ i ,- - in y U O `~ ~ y O~~ cf ~ N~ ~_ ~= ~ O Q U N U -D -- O = G '' O ~ O v"~i - ~ ~ ~ O N m~ C 0 O~ C 'y ~ O ~ y F' U ~ ~ ,y., rJ ~ b ,._., 'j ti ~~ ~ ' T.'^' O O N _' .~ ti vi c^ '. O ?''~.' ~ O "- .~ r U ~i. ~ en ^ "O 'b y O O ~ ~ y Y ~ D ~ .b O J ' U '° ~ . .i L cC .9 .. U N ~ f. U 3 ,_ = N y :. O N y [y b ~ N <tl ~ O cC [y ~ ~ y ... ~ .-.. ' _ •y _ r c~ b0 '~" ~ q r ~ ~ .. ~ ~ v OU ~ W i ;D Cn ~ ~ ~ tD cJ ~ 'O .fl Gw.. ~' ~ N O b z N~ N w N ~~ p b ~ 0 bA O^. .. O C) F-' q N~ A" q~ 0 .. ? 'O 0 0 c3 ~ ~ ^ ~ O - ~ U ~ b .+ T N 2 ^ c,1 ~ - ttl ~ O to y O % n1 ~ ~ b ~ ~ O O O N y r ^ , M '. a+ `O "' .~ N cd . M ~ "^ `~ U ~ N ~ U U - n ~ itl O ~ c ~ i y 4:, ~ ,O a> . O O pj c1 O a + _ ^_ ~ rJ ~- O ;~ 7 O cd y ~ b OO Y ~n pb , y y 09 tl ~ O~ i ~n to i Y p _ , , > ._ ~ c , 0 = U a 3 ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ -v ° ~ o q m c ~ cq ro c a :-. . ~, , p ° ~ 3 U ° ° ~ ~? . , T T ~ ~ w c O ~ y - •n - rn O N ~ ~ ~ VI ~3. ~ ~ N -A ^ ~ t=/I b r ~ U .~. N u ~ U i N _. = 'D Q~ N C -p Q~ N o U ~ o U ~ . ;' 3 0 . o ~ 3 R bn ~ '= -o _ ~ tq . b .~ z ' ~+ N ° N ,N ~ ~ ~ b ~ y ~ ~ ~ • y R$ ~ . • "' N U , ~ - N U , ~ '- 'D ~ N O •- '° ~ m O `r~ cNS V°'ri F~ rNS -oo ri 0 N U QJ R U U? • • w °' o ^ w °J 0 m "^ O ~-' 0 0 ~ o w °' o , O o bn m , O v Cn u ~ ... v C •. ~ B O O V CA ~ .. O v Cn m . a• 'd ^ O 03 o ~ 'LY .^^~ = r ~ O. •' O ~ b .^^. f o ~ 'ti r v i F ~ ~ r n, ,~ n a - n. ~ n a. ' . . c~ n a. a.. n a. A oA °' :°. ~ . ^ s n n .- ~ •- d .. .. .- 0 o F w o° ~ .: ~~ o .~ ~ o O w o~ w o 0 F' ^ .. ~ U~U U0.'.U Cfr H ~ U~U U~U cn o4 m m ~ op on ~ ~ a.+ y O~ w 0~ O C E O Y- w O~ w 0~ . r v T r v . N W~ w G~ ~ `U" v T C v ~ ~~ 4 6 ~ ~ ~ z v z ~ ~ c ~ > > > > ~ o -' ° o -' o ~ c3 U e~ O U c3 3 U ^ U td ~ ~ ~ y (~ r.+ U 3 ..U. `~ ro 0 U ~ O U .O N O U U O U O w O ~' ro O t y, ~ p t" 3~ ~ .jam ~ ~ 3 cn~ ~ ~ VI y° VI V1 ~ VI ~- /1 ~ lA y y° N ' ~ U O U_ ^ ~ U ro .'U r_y O U N ~_ ^_ Q U O ~ N ' Y ~ . Y Y + ~ a C j '° y C3 ~ N N W ~ CS ~ N v~ CJ ~ N v1 O H O O H O G O B "~ O~ 'y` '~ c3 y0 '~ ctl YO S " ~~ c~ YO ~~ iy O on ~ ~, on ~ ~, on m ~, ono ~, ° - ° ~ J - ~ ' U ~ U ~ - U U - ' n ~ ~ n ~ ~ r ~ ? r ~ U '~ O U '~ O .. N 'p O U '~ O w '. 7 ~ r cd ~' _' O -' p U p O O y O d' O O ^ -- cC 4 U O N _ ~ Y U ~ m U M ~ O N " O W W ~ m ' ^ ^ ^O . ~ p U U ry r O ~ U .O ~ U _ _ m bn O ~ U :~ .-. .U- .`~ ~ •~ ~'~ d b'b cbd T~ ^ r~i~ ~ U O.^ O .^ ~- vii ~ ^ ~ ^'O o a ~ ~ ' ~ ~ ~ ti ~ o~.''. , ~ , ~ ~ a o ~ ~ ~ .~ ~ 0 0 0 ~ o ~ . 3 W ~ 3 N °' ` 3 > on ~ `~ m ~ .ti o a b on ~ = , o ~ . ~ > ~ v 4. ~ ' ° Q ~ ° 3 en m ~ ~ 5 ." cn n'~ ti c ^ ~ ° ° y ~ ~, Pti a., V] (~ ~ y O U a3 `° ~ ~ 'ti -d •-~ O U Q ~ bD ~ O ^y ~ ~ O O ' 3 d¢ ~ .-. O U > ._U .-. `~ ~ .-. cd ~ U ~ ~ .~, 0. 0.' N U . N ~ O ~ U .Y-. y b ~ ~ N ' N 3 ~ i m ~ r O _ O m n ~, U 2 > v~ .O ^ 'B .D vi ' U ~ w ~ ° ~ a rn W ro 0] ~ 3 ~ ~ ° =o ~, 7 ~ ° ~ C ~ ~ a, ~ o w ~. o ., T >~ Cl U O ~ o ,U U ~'_' ~ o U U' p y ~ o o~ 3 .- O - c3 'd cJ c3 bUA y p ~' U _ L O V] a U ~ O. c O. cC U N u b-0 ~+ 4: by U V] .-. ~ U `~ -p ~ w U O U ~ ~ ' W n' '- U U '.-.' +' ~ 'd Q ~• U U U . -+ ~ ~ ~ R. N ,F , A ^ ~ U T ^. y 'pn U ~. ~, O U 'ia r m O '^" ~ ~ p, ~ O r. U ~ ~ ... O ~~ N Y~ a~ U hn O ~ ~ O y O ' ~ ., ' O ~ U > y O 0.'3 '~ ~ ' y r, O ` ' ~ ~ ' n ~ f'" ~ ~ 'U Uh ti _ ^ v y ~ .. O 0. 3 W r3 'D O C~ U U] H N ~ ~ ~ U ~i r 7 M O [~ ~./ n U O rl .~ .~ d' ti • • •~ o w J ~ o o ~ M ~ o u cn m 5 - a a.. cn a. ~:= o`na F C m G ~+. O ~ wo ~ F u " U T ^ U t0 J U~U ". F 7 Uw'U n c`q T ~ cFi T C cFi t3 J UGU - [d ~ VcCU v ~ > > _ V ~ ~ _ U CS ~ J . U a+ J U ~. ~ p N p U V 3 C° on 3 cn on ~ y ~_ C U J ~ i ,, J U F ti F~ N F N N LL ~ ~ y h . y C y O ~ F O ~ C ~~ id y0 ~~ iy YO b0 N rn bn N v~ ., a> Y - - a~ ~ U F a°i J ~ U C ~ J U 'Q O N '~ ~ F, ~ ~ F, a 'O U ~ ro y ° y -o ~ ~ ~ ° Y ;~ ~ id r ~.' ~ - U i y y •b ~ a~+ ~ H y O .+ °'Q °'O ~n N cC ro ~ n ~ . . on N m O 3 ai a~ c, ~ U U N w> ~ 2 ° °~ o .- c c w ^ ~ ~ U ° O = `~ w ~y ~ o ~ cn ro = ,~ c ro ' ~ J . ns r, ^ v F v U U d p -p V 'O Z, O r ~ .~ .~ cUS ~ ~ [C iy p~ y ~ N ~ ~n ~ U ° T ~ U ~ .°_ ~ C " o 3 = .~ ~ o v .~ J ~ y '~ o a7 ~ ~ ; a ~ Y ?, N i o ~ s w~~ 5 •o w~ ~s s U m y ~ '~ c° 'x ~ y o a a~ ~y ~ o a~ c y u a r~ ., ~ ~' N a • o U ~ a; 0 >, = U ~' >, ~ ~ ~ a`ai -o ~ ° ~ ~ F" b ~„ `'' . ° c ~ L b ro ~° d b o ~ o ~ m ^ . ... ° ~ o ~ ~ a4"i ° ' ~ ~ o ~ ~ ' - ~ ° ~ o '~ w ^ ~ cUi ~ ° o " .~ H U o ~ ' ~ ro ^ Q ~, v a s F v C7 w o x ._ c~ m ~i N a, o f Y o ~«-.._ N Q m ~ cn ° . ~ w 0 N e> Ci. N .-r 1-!1 • • y ^ N ~ O w ~ Y O ~ SON 'O WO ~ ~N t9O~O ~ ~ U .~0. _O , b cn _ - ~ c _ N- ~" U N m i° b O^ Chi ~ ' ^ N N en o ~ ~ O = w ~ ~ ' ~' ~ ~ ~ -o ~ n T 3 c v-, v 2 . > ~`~ o o o '~ p o ~ n ~ ti ~ ~ > ~ ~ ~ ,`~ ~s c, - _ ~. ~ ~ c~ 'cri-c ~:e '~ = ~ .D ~ cn ' ono r~ w -^ . ~i, c F ~ ~ o ~ E EC U ~ ~ ~ z E .' o .. , 0 N N O, N .~ J • C~ ~. q O O q N 4. -v.. c O o q o • d:. o u cn ti -_ E~ c o ' ~ o d :° ~ a on ~ ' 0 _ q LC. C v •- p p 0 y y w p ~ E ~, . W h a' 0 . ~ ~ > ~ ~, v U N-, r , V a; a c c0 - q ~ G o 4-. 0 0 W h c T ~ d N. r:r U~ V ~ ~ ~ > C °' ~D ~ o ~ m ~ ~ R U ~ CA 4=. y F •r. ` O bn ~ w . ~ N V~ .. ~ ~ 3 U ~ W ' q ~ , ^ O ~ y - O ~ O ~ ro G yC ~y iv o to a> ,~ H ~ U "' O ~ O O ~y N 2 ~ ~ U '+ O ~ ~ O Y .D 'b CD O ~ ~> W o U N ° ~ ~ ~ f G q O _ _ n. o o ~~ c p .U ~. 4. .. ,-. e> i - 7.. v O V7 ' U ~I " ? N d N C O ~ N ° vi N '~ ~ ~ v ~y .n T 'L ~ o N • ~ ~ ro ~ y~ C O ~~ II / Q O - ^ ~ y r"y, 40 O p Cn ^ a y ° o ~, N~ Z N N O ~ O ^ ^ O ^ . a.. O T ~ h = C n " ~ ^~ O O N U . . O r~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ ° ~ y cn^ ~' ~ v ^ ~~ b ° ~, ~ ~ ~ ~, o ~ ~ '~ o o . ~ ~ = - ~ `~ ~' S F-' ~ v o , ~ _~ n o ^ o~ ° e S e~ o ~ ~ ~ w 0 O C7 d + y U O ~ _. U^ O ~ ~ N O ~.. r; o ~ ~ ~ ~ y `~ ^ ~ - J 0 T v~ O •- y - c _ ~ .~ ~~ .- O H O c ~ '- y~ i O y ~ 2 c,> N N cJ N N y O tl O ~ C c3 0 N N 0. N • • • °' o 0 U en_ o `= ~ _ N ~ G -, cn 2 cn I~ ~.. o ~ T _ v _ N ~ U ~ U cn o ° ~ U Rt _ ~ ~ U C4U ~ ~ ~ N _. -_ p p U 3 0 >,'o ~ N N n ~ 8 I w `- aS r ~? a> O U N U ~ '' U II _ N N_ ~ N U O > .. cC N _ U N W ~ ~ ? ~ O N N U .' N ~ T O bn U ..- i ~ ^ ~ ~ ~ N ~ U ~ U vi ^ U ~ ~ N ~ N .~ ~ 2 U ~ V ~ y i N M U O v, O U _, ~ O w =' ^~ N p ~ .. b _ ~ `~' U ~ O y U ~ ^ cn U ~ I O ~ ! ` ^ W ^ ~. p O (d O y I y y~ ~ ^ ~~ _ p~ U U O O ~ ~ U ~' U -~ '" , O Y .. ry U ~ O _ ~ `n U '. `-~ to ~ _ T O - O O tin :y U U ~ ' O O U~ ~ ail U Cn N U ~ .. U U ~ o ~ =' °~ ~ n ~~ ~. _ U U cn b ~ o o c aN r o N a ~. _ c~ _ ~~ _ ~ y N ~ ~ y . ~ ~ ~ .^~ VI ^ fd ~ ~ N ¢ N y ~ r ~( ~,.. ~ Y ~ ~ w v~ ~ N p fd ~ U „' y ~ ^ n fd ~ C 0' p. > O ~ ~ 3 ~_ ^ p 3... J U N ^ _ ~ O ~ n C 3 ' o U O ~ •- ' b ~ p N o 0 = - - ' b ro `,~ - U + + . ~ ~ ~ ^ N ~ °> N "D ~ ~ °3~ ~ ~- w cn _ u tiw ~ ~ . ~ °' S `~~p o v ° ~ ~ ago = = o ~ ~~ -b. ~ ~ . -o ~ ~ O cn 'm ° N r ~ ~ ~ N . h.°3 , =-O ~ o ' Y, o ~ ~ ~ .n a. "' ~ ~ ~ ~ c~U . _ ~ cn ~ p ~^cn y N ~.. = ~N o cS ~~~ cn~Y ~~ ~?cncao = ~'`"" U ^ ^ ~ U ^ '~ vUi N ;n ~ U ~ cUJ `!' ~ N ~ O "' N " '~ 'D 2 ~ U O- O `7 = [3.~ U O N ~ :9 ~ y~' p Q - N 2 O ~ 'O = J ~ c1 ~ - ^ ~. ' . L: -o~o o U Y . o ~ T o r O := O. J y .. ~ . N o o~ o v ~ ~ ~ v ~ ~ .o .^~ °_ ~ v .o ~ Yn^ U ~ ~ T. O . n N O ~ '^ p ~ F p :~ i ~ ;n N ~ _ ~ 'U ~ n ? ~ '- ~ O =~ ~= n O ^~ O'' , :~ v i V ) . , ~. : s ~ p o ° o 0 p ' co - =' =cJ " '~ ~a ' ~ a . ~ ~. 2 ~~ ~ U N== ~ pa E~~- iU a ~N~ y NC~U oc i -cU: . p3 - a' N o gnu= :~ > .S _ . _ N . :. - O c~i ei .D e~ ~J • • U a % _ Z ' .- U CA - ~ m O CJ ~ ~ ' o . - n ~ 2 ~ ~ .. ~ n ti c ,., c~ ~ T ° ' ~ - ~ . m o o i m " ~ ro N ^ .~ ~ ro ~ m • g i o ~ o : ~ a moo c D ~ v ~ ~° n~ m ^ o a..n ? ,= o 3 ~ ~ . o c U•o ~ ~ 0 o .. O ~ moo'. ~~~'~ ~ ~ ~ N ^ ~ >, h = . . ~ N -~ U U O .;. • r ~~ _^ U J O O ^A O c3 `~ F r U ~ CA ^ r y O~ ^ U N ^~ O U ' ~ r w 'o ~ ~ o ~ ~ ' o 'm ° ° ° °' n ¢' c r ~, 0 ~ v 0 c 0 ^ ~ F m= ~ ~ UT V ~:- ~ ~ a v ~ cn N w c- 3 2cC7 o ° ~ ~ ._ _ 0 N N a v ~. ~, • u w^~ 0 0 0 ° ' o y 'o d ~ ~fi o , - o ~ onN o v bnN c ,. n ~. v a n a. ~ ' z cn e y .y . C ~c ^ G O - ' U f. P Q .~ O^ C O y C C J _ "" ' L U O ^ ~ O . ^ rJ W N a 7 T U ~ U d LC .'3 ~ ~_ n ^n _ ~+ y o o ,,. Y ^ fi o v :, w o o °~ '-- o p O ~- .. W y c ~, ~ v ~ .T. w Ki .fi-i V xU UdU ~ ~ ro o o N o ro o ~ w ~ ~~ ~.~ 3 y > ~ c = ~ '~3 Y ~ Y ' c a c'fi T ~ Y b r ow 'z'ro T 'a^ ro ~ o o 3 O CS ~ ~ ~ ^ HU RS Y [d CS N ~ O N ~. ry ~ O .~ N N~> u c C O ' N ~ N p ~' N u ~..~ O ~ O cd p 'U p L J U p N ° n c ' n E > o O .D -. V-~ 3 ° 3 ^ > a -~, o o.~ - c 3 0 .3 ^ f.y O 2 O N~ ~ N . -O N ~ 2 ~ ~ n> Y .D O N 9 N ~~ ~ :'S ~ N 'J C$J CSI ~ GJ ^+ C.j ~ N J :J N J CS N N . N . F- °~ ~ o c v .~ .- air = ._ n. 0 .. F "~ c v w ._ ~ ~: n. .5 .O ._ ^ U N f, ~ `~ O T O ~ p ~ W p ^ a m ~ > = ~ m ~ ~ bn i ~ ^C . U ~ . ~ p~ ~ c3 U 7. ~ i O ,.. ~ y ° ~ ~ ~ ~ ro o ~ ° ~ ~ ~ ~ c . o. p m ^ ~ . ~ G nJ ~ cy (~ ^ U w r3. •' N ~ O N ~ OU > ~ ti cJ O a7 ' '6' ~ ~ 'O O O O ^ ~ > N _ ' ~ p . O ~ ' N p ~ R .~ - Y Op .ti N ^ U ti ^ N N N y~ ~ ..N N ~ bn C N 2 bD ~ cC ~ i^ CD b OU cNJ b N CA o N U O m U N -, N E °'3 '~' ~ ti 'N ~ > 5 N bn ~ bn c, c ~ ~ b ^ ° 3 -o ~I ~ O - id ' N . ' ~ u ~ _ O cn N O O. \N c3 i C. ~ OJ .^- 'D '._ .~ vi c3 p ~> C : ~ CC N 'D c~ O C . N '= ~~ U a^' O O N O O O _ N CJ U O '= .=~ Z O ^ ' ~ N w p ^ w ~ vi . . ~ w O " f- c~ o ^ .- ~ .- N ~ .° - ~ ~ y o 'ti ~ ~ c o U ^ ~~ c' " o m ro a'' r'cn~ w 3-O . ;. - o n . ~ ~ ~ h ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ T CJJ y ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O itl ~ ^^ O ~ = . . . a+ ~ O ' "" ~ ° ' ^' w ~ c ° - ~ _ o ~ U H a. . ° 3 ~s o - 07 ~ ~ -o +~ ti E ~ [ ~ . .^ 0 N c ~. p 0 N • • • yw .- o y ~^ = o o v on ~ o ~ on e. ,r cn a. c .°'. cn n. en ~ c w o ° ~ o ° ^ ^ U cJ U J ~ -. c? ~ U~U U='U oi°n _n w o ~ w o ° y ^ J T ^ U ~. ~ 7 U rxU ~ [tl ~ Ucv!U -o 'n `~ ~ _._ x ~ .0 tC 3 ~u~ > w O C o om ~ ~ cd 0 ~ U ~ C cJ ~ y N ~ ~ W 'O O q ~ ^^ 0 2 ~ ~ . ^ ~ '^ Y ~ O ~ rn au O . y ~ . o ~ > ° ~w . .. ~ ~ a ~ " ~ b .~a ~ ~ e ~ ~' ~~ w y Y J --~o~;~_ ~ ~ ~ ~ i a i ~ on ¢ ~ ~ ~ p ~ ~ y ~ v i i V i . -p ^ R Cy6 v ~ NN ~ ~ '. i cy .~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O N 3 cn m ~ ~ .. 'p ~ ._ rn ^ ~ ~ 0 ~ m '~ 3 y v ~ 'o .'~' .o ~ v L ~ r 3 o .~ ro ^ o U o~ o ._ 'en., on. ~ ~ ~ o y bi .omoo~y= ~ ~ ~? U ^ ~ U ~ ~ y _ ~ .3 ~ w ~ ~, N ~ ~ O ~ ny ctl N ~ _ U ~' ~ U c~ ,., W ~ F ~ Cn ~ is ..~ ~ U ~ ~O in ro U N ti 7> W ~ ~ 5 e~ o b0 cad O b - b 0 .: U ~- N Cq O T ~ "O ' Y ca ~ O N U J a ~tl D r U ^ [tl y U k O 'O• ^ 'O ' ~] ~ U ~ O rJ O V) O CA .J O n ~ ~ O .fi C ~ ~ U ~ ~ t't ' J _ . . O O U'D a., r ~ ~ .~- U O s m ~ ~ E n : ~ . . ~ U ~,. ~ cs ~ ~ _ ¢ > ? "~ •.~ ~ ~ ~ r U `n .. > O b y 2 U O p L ', ~~ _ o ~ ~ ,. ^ U i0 ^ _ w _ U ~ U y N ~^ rox -- = . o 0 ~~-. ^ ° O o ~ O ~ w '? ~ O ' ' ~ ~ = y 70 ~ n 'D m U ~ o •a i ~s ~ >> ~ ro ^ ~ ~^ a ~:. '?~ ~ '. ~ `~ N cC ~ ~ ' ~O ~ ~ v ~ N O o r. c w. ~ :J o ~. ~ ~ o a a. ~ ~ '~ ~ ~' ~ ~ ~ ^ a 3 x Y ~ "' ~ w l ~' 3 Cn ~ '~ v m o ~ ~ . ~ v' o a. o ~ ~ n. T3 0 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 N v P i a U 1! 11 u • w w w ° o ° o v 00 w . o v cA N o v b0 u m b . ~ m'ci m'o ~_ F..~ a a. w ., a a N ~ ~ a..~ ~ n. on cn cn a w o o w o F ~, o° i f' U T^ U i• ^ U ~ U N ,U U~U Uti' V D A o0 a ~., o° c w o° w o °~ ° V ~ ° J cJ ° U c3 U~U UrLU U~.-'U 'O '~ '~ . ^ ., . U i U ~ U ~.: rn W vi Y u ti c3 ~ cS N sue, N Y ~~ N U ~ N ~ N oa oa o.~ Q • 3 3 a ~ • 3 , , , f~ .~i ~ ti n ti 1-• ~ ti ~ ti Y ~ N y U ~ - ~+ U i ~~ ~ ~ U N~ N + 1 ~ 4 r ti ~ ~ ,~ O bn ~ .= •Vi bn N , ~ ti bA r U ~ H ci ~ h U ':n >. 'O r O C t0 ~ ° ' CD ^ N c o ~ T ~d U V O ~' ~ bn ~ N y ~ ~ ~ . _ c m ' ~ ~ ° ~ - v~ a i „ ~ ~ ~ ~ ? ~ o ' ° ° o M O O ~ N Q U ~ ~ J O v^ '" U ~ W r N O . ~ .a .... •... ^ ~' - p ~ ._ bn T7 ~~ ~ ~ ~ U w n O ~ ~ U N ~ ~ ° ~ 0. U c ~' bq ~ N y Cn ^ f1, cC N u1 ry ~ m ^~ ^ tl -^- O U ~~ ~ F' ~ ~ O ~ ' N C ~ ~ ~ 4's U , ~, ~ ~ ~ n Cl ° U O +' O N 0 m a+ h o m :; r ~ r :' ~ r, •~ 7 _ ~ N ~ ~ 3 O ~n F N O A p Li -y id ,-~ ~ ~ td . _~^. N . ~ U ~ N ^ U cJ .W U . i . ~ O O ~ - _ e ~ o ~ o o ... ~ ° ~ ° o ~ N ~ o `~ ti b 'h > '~ 'a Q o _ N C W ' N ~ o H '~. U O .~ ~~ ~ • c N O O j N +~ N . , w O y U ~ ~ , Y ~ ~~ U r ~z ~~. o ~.~~ ~, ~ ~ 3° u~°O. 0 r! a -`~. A, N N ti • • • :. p ~ v w o w ° w ° w ° = en ~ E o C " o v ~ o v °D ~ o v ~ ~n bn v :: _ ° " .5 . ~ _ _ H ~~ '' , ~ y'3 ~ '. ''7 ;, . ti's d n.. p. c, ._ ~ a. a . ~ o. o:.~ ~ a c +- .: o w ~ o •y : : ~ w o° ~.. o° F w o° w o° F ~ _ ~ . n~ n n ' H ~ ~ ~ rs o m O - ~ 7 ' U~ U V C V V C U U G U . n N L d Q G A .. .. .- n ,. ~ ~ a ~ ~~ ' ~- ' ~~7 ' -~~ Uc U Uc U U0. U UGU U N ~ ~ U U U U ~ '> w w ~ ~> w ~ ~> w ~ ~> ~ o - ~ -o o ^ ~ - o ^ ~ o ^ ~ ~ o N n n a N n v N i n v N o~ o o~ n° o~~ c o c~ n o o- ~ m- ~ ~- ~ ~^ ~ ~ i v U 3 ° ;' v U 3 "z u o ' n'~ 0 0 ° v 4:, i U 4 ~ iV w N ~: iGy .n. O ,~. i E ,nr. N O - c F' c'1 O = c v F' <t O ,: 3 ~ c /-~ a n v~ n. ~ v~ a. n ~ n. ~ a ~. n z. o. n, ~~~ as °'~ a.w o'er ~W ~'~, o w ~ ~ ° o o = w ~ ~ o ,~ i W a 4 . . i W a L d' '° ~ ° ~ b - ° ~ '° - ° v -O ~ ° v U p n N p -_ n p U U n U U p n ~ O F Q y O . ^. ~ Y .O _ O CJ . - ~~ o u U~ b .fin ~~ 8 .yn m~ o ,nn o m _ _ o, o F ~ O - ¢ o ~ ~ o N ,D 5 vi ~ U 'D O ° ~, ~ ~ y w~~ N ~ °-n ~ ° ° ° ~ o ~3 ~ eN> O U ~ Y N y L >' ~ +~+ iU _ v ~ ° ° o n ~ ~~ ° c ~ N o, '~+= w ~ p ~ p o n -° -o -° p ~ w O > . ~ n R U C D ~ O ' O . U ~ U Q ~ U C c `~ ~~ Z ~ "D D ~ ~ . ern 'o ~ h 3 '~ ~ '= 3 c ~ v ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .~ - o ~ o ~ N ~~ m _ ~ r ~~ m ~ ~ ~ U U V] L r ~ to ,^. ~ V1 U ~ N '' > ~ ~ . , ~ U ~ ° ~' N ~ o n ~ ~ x rnn ~n cs T e~ U i N U 'a ;~ = ~ is ~ ~ rob rot. ~ ~ cn > ° o -o :.; n _ ' ~ ° J N L ~ , ~ ~ o ~, O E ~ ." o p .... P-. ~y N ~ ~ 2 N "' m W ~ U L a + ._ N b ~ ~ ~ ^ 3 U n C > y ~ oL ~ 0 ~ _ u o ~ ~~ n ~ a~ Q O N O '~ ~ ~ ^ ~ 0. i 0 ~ y ~ _, n 0 V ~ ~ .. ~ ^ C .~ ~ N O N ~ > ~ > ~ 3 .~ YO ~ ~ y ~ 0 rl v [~. c~ N .~ • • u w w w w ~:, O ° ° ° ° fn ~ cn o° N U on o° U cn N o U v cn „ o U U to ,~ o U [ ~„ _ N __ 0 O ro 'O O cS 'D p M 'O O l b ~ tC '"O -~ N 'J. N N 3 N '. VI 'J' N '. N '~ N '.~ N m cn ~ cn m c n m on ° cn ° cn ~ _ c w o ° w o ° ~,., o ° ~., o ° ~,.. o ~ ~,.., o ° T C U O y u ° u ~ T~ ~ T~ v ~ _ cs ^ ULU ~ n ^ V 0.'U r ^ V LU _ c~ ^ U'x V _ r o UfL V i r U~U cq 9 oA DA tp CA ~... O ° ._ O ° w O ° ~.., O ° ~. O ° w O ° ° U 7 ° U d _ ° U ~ ° U [ ' _ ° U [J ° U r t T .~ U [ i^ v ~. ^ U y . . i .~ U T .-~ U J .- U T ~ _ id ~ _ c s ~ _ m ~ _ n ~ . . _ ~ ~ UCU U~U UC V U^1 V UCV UrLU U U U U U U U ~ ~ ~_ ~ b b 'D 'O 'D '~ ^ ° ^ N ^ CJ ^ ti ^ U ° CJ ~ ~J :7 3 C.t ~ r 3 N z N ~ N ~ N ~~ 3 m ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 5 ~ ~ :s ~ o ~ o y o r o ~ o ~ o o ti ° N v N v~ o N U H U - U U V U U cd tC of c~ c3 [tl O 2 O 2 O 2 O G O 4 O 2 iC .- _ ^ c~ .- y ~ y id y n .~ ^ c3 . ~ DD ~ N CA CJ Jl N Cn ~ V yn U Cn U OJ ° N C° N C N °~ = U~ ro Y ~s ~ ro ~ ~ y ~ ~, r- b ° ~ ~ °_ ~ b °_ ~ a ° ~ b U ~ ~ ~ y^ U y ~ U y ~ [) L y^ U y ~ U y v U o ~~' o ~~' o Uw o ~w o off; o otJ, 0 o to o o cn o o cn o o En o 0 on o o ~p a n.'N a fl.'m c. n.'N a n.'N ~ ~.'N w =.'N O ^ ~ U ;n y ~ ~ U o cs N z o ~ 3 o a> m a~i _' ~, v a-Oi ~ ~ °~' ~ o ' o ° ^ °' ~ o ' o , ~.° ~3 o 3 3 ~ 3 0 ~ ~ o N ~. o ~ mb ~ . a 0 3 c o N- ro o cv .~ o m 2^ a h~ on ~- o~~ °~ f- m ~ _ C C o C O O U. U G ~ O ~ ~ 1J ttl N C CL ~ ~ N ~ U N ~ ~ ++ _ ~ _ ° O.. r. N ~ ' O N ~ C M U O bn ~n d, 3 ~ U O .~U r vl O ~+-. 'u ^ U c3 ~ l0 fn 3 U O D N Y . N ^ ' N 'i+ ?) U 'L7 te 4- '~ O y '~ ~ ~ ~ r N U .Y ~ O ~ OU cV ~ U X N ~ U U r - , J '~cc r ' C N ~ c 1 'J of 'O O . p N .N N ~J ~ ~ N O '3. Y ~ O 'U ^ ~ 2 N O '~ 'n O r . - U 2.. 'U '_3..^^., ~ U 2 a . U~ U - O D . U~ 'O N , U O OU ~ c1 U 'O ... U to y = U h a' Y '~ nj .-. :-~ E N 3 .. ~ - W ^ - ~ o ~, ~- a ~ u i - N ' cn U y .^ ~ ~ o .. ~ ro ^ U O ~ U . OU "'~ _ O ~ y <y [J > N ~ ? ~~ ~ ~ r ~ V .A ' CJ ^ ~U ,V ~ CS :~ J 7 ~ ^ U .- O N=% U r N ~ o U '~ y o.' N ~ ' • ^ ° b .3 ~ U o ff- ._ o °-'' °~'"~ r n ~ ^ O U ^ 0 N 0 R e~ v (`J ~: • • u w ° o v CO m o N a C .; .n ~. n oq w o ° u.. o ° T _ v T ~ v R ~ U cLU = rJ 7 U~U to o9 w o o o ° ° i U U ^ U ~ _ [~ ~ U ~ U t3 ~ U ~ U U T Q !~ to a", ~ o -y0'm ~w 5 > cv ~ in (-' U '~ - .- O > ~ o . ^. ~ = o m ~ ~ ~- o = En ~ ~ ,. _._ o ^ v m cn h m N ~ ~ ~ > ,- = ?i - o ~ o -O ° " R ~ o - ° o ~ " ro o " O 2 O = .~ a~ ~ ~ ~ o ~° U ,J ~ ~ O- •-~ N O U ~~ U •- ~d ~ 3 '~ v t°n ~ o -O- Y ~ is w° '~ -o ~ o N "' ca U ~ ~°~ m O N ~ cs ° ~ o . '-' N +~+ Y Y N ca W to ~ N _.... ~ ro b V .~N'~ r'".' > . TJ n O -`n .- ~ ry O U O N 'i7 ~ ~ N N c1` cci ctl O cy ° ~ U coi ~ ~ °n - O 3 n ~ b o ~ ~ ° . ~ m ~ ~ ~ ~ ° c3 ~ ~ , 3 ' '-' ' O ~ ~ y N N rJ U N~•~ ~ b N > O n ~~ O ~ O O O ~ ° ° Q _ 7 ° ^ 'O ~ ° ~ N ~ "OO O N Q . ~ N ~ U O U m D N ~ ^ 'G ' ~.~° J . ~ ._. O . ~ U = ~ O w O O O tJ w '= N fn ~ O ^ ~ N N ai cd UQ U f=1 ~r~~-. UCa ow c ~.rov~U on c~ a., ~ o U ._ _ _ , _ . ~ j ^ _ ~ I^-~ O N Cn ~ i N (J _O ~ vj ~ b ~ U U CJ ~ N ^ y T+ N _ . . y n~ ~ =~ j N U o o y o ° ~ N o~~ g S ~ .-. U v O ~ ~n ~ ° u1 ~ '~. ' 0 i 7 ^ ' ' p ^ 0 N ._ N N .jam N > ^ ~ ~ p 3. ~ J ^ '~ _ t0 O tn i~ ~ r 'U ~ O'er ~ ~ '~ . v ~ p ` m ' ~ '~ ^ ^^ U U '2 _ N ~ ` ~ ^ ` ~n ~ ~ o ° . - ~ o T c ~ ~ p ,- rJ .J - ~ ',.. ^ - .:. to z ^ ~ e~ vi vi .~'r ~ = F - a> ~ o °' N ~. N L -o o. 2 ,. '" = o °- to cq J _ ,- ~ ~ ~ ~ to ° ~ = =" U ~ z ~ ~ b ~- ~ = ~ ~ o _ a~o o~o._ ~-_ ~ o 4:0~ ' o r o ~ o ~ vi E- -.~ c ° U v ° ° ~ ° c, F- c., R.'~ n. ° °_' ~ ~ n -oa -. n in c 'O ai ~ ~ o 0 N a n. 0 N • u • o ° s U bn ~ U bn ° ~ U on ? _ N D /1 Q O Q O U ~ n D w o k w o° o° T ~ U T. U T~ U C rd o . - otl O C m^ ' U~ U U~ U U~ U rs cn ~ cn rt cn w O° w O° w O~ T C v T A U T° v A 7 = ~ ° m ° UcCU Uc'U U~U N ti ~ , .. cUJ ° U ro U U ro° n ,~ ,. ~n N a ~ ~ ° b 'O 4i ~ b .= 4J ^ W i .~ O ..~~. to .~ O .~ b0 .~ O .~ On O y' y _O y' y O y' y 0.O U p O' N U p - O U O cJ .~ 7 ~ yd .~ O U ~ .~ O U O U U N U? N U N _' U 7 U p p p~ ~ U ~ ~ U = ~ .= Y .. p .~.Y O ~~ Y~ O '~ ~ ~ ~ O j O j ~ O ~ ^ O O 0 ti ~ 0 ~ U c3 O 0 ~ O `~ ^ ~'~ '~ 2 Cn ~ 2 ~ ° - ~ v T '' ' ',.. O O cd T r3 H ~ a `~ o •• ~ U - ~ v v -o °~ ~ ff '~ • ° ti ~_ ~ -o 'cn N > > b~~ ~ ~n ° ~~ ~, 'o y o. ti ro° j'o.5."0~~0 ~n° -.,oa~ ~°~, y > a..a;°=aF ~Y y _ w ° o ... ~ ~' •" o ~ ~ ~^ c `~ m o. c i~ ~ a~ C ° m o a ~ o a ~ ~ ~ o , , ~ = q '" , ~ " ~ • ' . ~ ~ bn c " ° ~ o . ~ o o ~ a v ~; •- ° ° ~, -- bn on ~ bn ~ ' > ~ ° a ~, ~ . _ >, a. a'o ° .y ^ '~ ~ N > W . y ~ , cd ~, " ~ ~ ~ O N w -p ~ O Cn O itl O P O ~ 7 ^ v ~ ? ~ o v .~ ~ « ~ .: p O ~ = h bn iy a~ n ^ o C N '`' > C 'D C~ a~ ~^ O ,~ m o O U- cd m :0 0 3 n ?' ~ w~ _ n ' . ;~ ' o ' i .: ar a >,.^ cD . Y ro o o._ . ~ dam ^ U ° o . °> d ~ . . F-o > o ~ °> i>o ti w.~vc` ~ v`a ai ~r'2o ~n ~ '- ^ N k"_m'3w `~~ , °N''?~ ~ i ~ a , . ~ «~ O ~ ctl CA y ,^. O ~ L , O O L ' a~ `y v ~ en y w ~ ~ N ~ ~ ~ ' ~ `~ = _ ,- 'n •- _ c1 > ~:-. r U o r~ '~ o u In ,., O o ~ ~ ~- j 4, ^ -y w i-~ r~ i - U _~ U ~ ~ = ~ N °' ~ o ^ ' ~ 7 v ° y ~ C p N 'J O y t .A 2 <'J C - ~ `> y ~ i> (-' ' - O n , ~ _ , . X 1 ° 'O ti U ~ i '~ U _ _ ~ _ O U? U U O U _ .O O ~ .U ~ p '~ ~ .N r ~ ^D ~ U R Cn ~ y0 . T ~ ._ ~ ~ = N ~ ~. ~ N O ti = ~.y ,u O W ,% U U c6 O~ O ~y U U O U ~ ~ ~ O > U ~ [C cJ , R1 O . N c3 ~ T ~ N ~ ~ . ^ U ^ bA ~ a~ .Y 9 0 'p = ~ ~ ^ a°i ^ N in U ~ vOi ~ b O ^y ~• > O - ns v Q ~ cJ N N~ O W L ~ O ~ b ~ . ~ 0.O b7 ~ U O L`~ d) .~ ti O. N !• • "- O o o ~ on ~ cn ~ cn ° = - ° ° ^_ - o - ro ~ n..~ on a. ~ o ~ v c O n cn on c c ° U ro T C U T ' U _ ~J _ _ _ [O _ = _ f] UxU U.U UcLU ~a cn ro on r cn w o ~ ~. o ° ~.. o ° i" U T A U T A U _ n O - rt 3 ~ U C V U C U U~ U In N ~ ~ U U cy ti U U ~J CJ v°i U ~ . - - . - d N ^_ .^-. > U U > U U .~ ro U ro u_ ° O .= cA U ro .~ O = CD i en ti ti , ~' ^ ~ U w ° ^ N w ° r .3 r > J ° CS. ,~ ~ Y U Cy y0 N ~~ O v > O f' CS y > ti _ U U U U_ U N - U C .f e) _ ro ro U ^ ro O ~. U U ~ ^ U V~~ [J .~ ~ N u O CO 'D > y~ C 'O ? F u U U ~ ~ U N ~ U F ~ ,.+ ^ ~ ~ ^ ~ y VI m O V (: ti ~ ti O U .= U U N ~ 4% ro U ro O ro U N O ~ y v~ 2 CU vi .-_ r3. ~~ ° ro ~ y m v . .. O ^ a~ > u y d ° >. F Y ~ O . F^ U ', ti ti ~ b y U O U 3 y ti T > ro . ~ ~ o w ,_ ° ~ ti p _ ~ v a> ti L c3 ti 'd bn ~ y om, _ F W~ rNj d r0 W ' U T- '~ ro U ' U `~ ^ ~~ N T 'O .. `n ~ y~ U . ., ~ n 0 3 0. (tin p m '? ,L' .. ~'. ~ N b^ b °) ro U ~ ti F ti O ~ o ~ .F :° 3 a ~^ "" ~ .°' ~ o . 3 c i .^ ~ ~ a a °-° ' • - 0 9 i o '~ .°^ . . O . P G N ~ , Oq ,~ ~ . .^ ro ,. u N >' ^ U r1. ~ ' ' ti u D~ ~ w G: y^., ? .~ 2 U /I ~ O N U~ U " >~ p~ V] i r . ~ ' ° o ' ~ ~ m 5 ° w >, m ' P v .o .- i ~ m ~., ro CL i ~ s ,~ c ~ ° 0 > ~n p N ._ ~ ~ ~ U M M ~ C c M G n 'D .O tC ~ • -~ rJ > ~ J Y ~ ~ u ;,d awi .5 ~'~ ate ., f. .. ~.= ~'m o~^a' ~ro~y; -°.p~ a 3~:o~~~ N -O = io . U ~ ~ N U .~ O ~ > Y . ~ O O m 0 ti .ti U .~ U W f1.'+ i ' Q d u _ 'n O O > r U '. Q U O ~ ^ ^ 5 .. ., _ O ^ _ u "y_$ 30 ~.% j 'tC O O O v 'O CJ ~i N O .B U i ~ r3 O .- in G1 U ti p 2 _ _ ~ -1 u ._ 'D v u C V CS J~ 9 U r r1 " h _ [L ~ ro~ fl. F ~' O `~ •- F U O a _ _ r ~ ~= > Q ~ > U 3 m~ n. ~ .o v ~ O T u o 0 G ,y ~ 0 N N a ~. N Wilson Avettue Extension (East) City of Rancho Ca~camonga Draft Envrronntental Impact Report • II. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND LAND USE A. Introduction The purpose of the Land Use section is to identify and evaluate existing and potential land use issues as they relate to the development of the subject property. Land use information is derived fom recotmaissance of the project area; review of aerial photos and planning documents; available data from the City of Rancho Cucamonga and County of San Bernardino. The project site is vacant of any permanent structures and is currently used as a maintenance access road for County Flood Control. B. Proposed Land Use The proposed land use involves the construction of street and drainage improvements with appurtenant improvements such as landscaping and lighting. Ultimate land use includes public use of the project site as a public road for vehicular, bicycle, and pedestrian circulation. C. Existing Conditions The project site is cm-rently vacant and void of any permanent structures. It currently exists as a dirt road situated as a raised unimproved roadbed. A mm~ber of drainage facilities traverse the project site • under the raised roadbed, including drainage pipes conveying local flows and the outlet structure for the Etiwanda Creek Debris basin. D. Adjacent Existing Land Use and Land Use Compatibility As depicted in Figure II-3, the existing land uses surrounding the subject property are noted below. North: Vacant, Etiwanda Creek Debris basin South: Vacant East: Residential West: Residential The proposed project will not result in hnpacts or conditions incompatible with existing land uses in the immediate area. E. Existing Land Use Regulations City ofRanclto Cucanron~a Genera/Pla~z •, The project site does not have a land use designation within the Land Use Element of the General Plan. As depicted on Figw-e II-I, from the City's General Plan Land Use Map, land use designations sunrounding the subject project site are as follows: II-1 September 2011 Wilson Avenue Extension (East) City gfRancho Cucamonga Draft Environmental bnhac/ Report • North: Very Low Density Residential, Conservation South: Neighborhood Commercial, Very Low Density Residential Conservation, Flood Control, Low Density Residential East: Low Density Residential, Very Low Density residential West: Low Density Residential,'Very Low Density residential F. Thresholds of Significance The following criteria are adapted from the Califonva Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Appendix G for use in evaluating the significance of land use impacts resulting from the proposed project. A project would typically result in a significant adverse land use impact if it would: • Conflict with applicable land use plans, policies or regulations of an agency with jwisdiction over the project (including but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the propose of avoiding or mitigating an enviromnenta] impact. • Result in a substantial and irretrievable loss of open space. • Result in a substantial change in the character of an established convnmrity, or otherwise physically divide an established community. • Be substantially incompatible with existing land uses in the vicinity. G. Project Impacts Consisteirc~~ with ApplicaGle Land Use Plans The proposed project is consistent with the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan. The existing General Plan Land Use Element and Circulation Element, Figure II-2, provides for the development of the subject property as proposed. CompatiGility rvHlr Existing and Planned Land Uses A project would typically be considered to have a significant land use impact if it results in a conflict due to the siting of dissinular or potentially incompatible laud uses in close proximity to one another. hicompatibility often results when uses that cause noise, vibration, air pollution, odor, lighting or visual impacts are ]orated adjacent to uses typically refen-ed to as "sensitive receptors", such as residential • uses, schools, parks, or hospitals. II-2 September 2011 Wilso» Avenue Exle»sion~ (East) Draft Gnvironnrenlnl Imipact Report City of Rancho Cucanaorrga • The proposed project is consistent with existing and plarnred land uses in the area will not result significant incompatible conditions. H. Cmnulative Impacts In that the proposed project assists in the implementation of both the Land Use and Circulation elements of the City general Plan, no significant cumulative impacts to land use are expected as a result of the project. Mitigation Measures No mitigation measures are required. Level of Impact The project will not result in significant adverse impacts to surrounding existing and plamied land uses in the area. • r 1 U II-3 September 2011 tiVilson Avenue Extension (East) Draft Er7vironmental Impact Report • Fibure II-1 Genera! Pla~r Land Use Desi;itatio~is L • Residential Very Low (<2 DU's / AC) (~ Low (2-4 DU's / AC) Low Medium (4-8 DU's / AC) Medium (8-14 DU's / AC) ® Medium High (14-24 DU's / AC) ~ High (24-30 DU's / AC) Commercial Office ~] Neighborhood Commercial Community Commercial ~ General Commercial ® Commercial Recreation Mixed Use ® Mixed Use Industrial [~ Industrial Park General Industrial - Heavy Industrial Open Space Hillside Residential Conservation ~ Ooen Soace II-6 March 2010 6~ilsorz Avenue Extension (East) Draft Environmental Impact Report • City of Rancho Czrcamonga Figure II-2 Circcilatio~i Elenzefit Map of the General Pla~z / ,: ii /,' /~i ~ i ~ ~ ~~`, f , ~ ~ ~~~ ,. ,,' ~ Wilson Avenue ~ ~ ~~ -- --~\ . . ~'~ / ~' ~ P ~f rl~ -- - _'~ ~ .1 ' ~~l~~,~~=7 ~~- ~ , o ~,~\_c. ~ ~ __.- m C _ ~~ C6 5~~ ~- f ~ J~~yt~~y~' `* Location ~-_s~. ~s.. ~, ~~;: • ~ c - - -a ~ c r- 3 - y ~*~*Q' W co W i ?f =~Y, _ ~ ~t --~~ '-~~~ti..•....~-- _- _ .. ...._ is -~,r~~ ~t~~.,~.~, ~ it • Wilson Avenue SY=~:`~~_ FOOTI-SILL (SR 3~ `i .- '~ Collector ' _ - R ~ E~f ~/ AY Modified Collector with Median ~'~ Secondary .'~•.'~ Modified Secondary with Median ~~ Major Arterial /~ Modified Major with Median :/ Major Divided Arterial ./ Major Divided Highway ~_~ Intersections to be widened beyond typical General Plan standards ~~'~:,-``~ Freeways ~ Freeway Interchange II-5 March 2010 Wilson Avemre Extension (East) Draft Ezzvironnzental Impact Report • Figure II-3 Aerial Photograph -Existing La-td Uses • • City of Razzcho Cucamonga II-6 March 2010 Wilson Avenue Extension (East) City of Rancho Cucamonga Draft Environmental Impact Report • III. RESOURCE MANAGEMENT AND PUBLIC HEALTH & SAFETY A. OPEN SPACE and CONSERVATION The aligmvent of Wilson Avenue establishes an east-west street which traverses the watershed of Etiwanda Creek. The area to the north and south of the project site is essentially void of structures with the exception of the detention basins, debris basins and flood control facilities constructed in Etiwanda Creek. The Land Use Element of the City General Plan establishes a Conservation land use designation both north and south of the Wilson Avenue right-of-way alignment in the central portion of the project between East Avenue and Wardman Bullock Road. Additionally, a Flood Control land use designation exists south of Wilson Avenue east of and adjacent to the Conservation area. These areas are comprised of the existing improvements associated with the Etiwanda Creek flood control channel and debris basin. Conservation Easement A conservation easement was established by the County of San Bernardino Flood Control District as part of the permitting process for the detention basins, debris basins and flood control facilities constructed in Etiwanda Creek north of and adjacent to the project site. The southern boundary of the conservation easement abuts the northern boundary of the project site. Said easement is depicted in Figure III-1. The primary objective of the easement is to conserve and protect the various sensitive pant species that exist and provide potential habitat for sensitive animal species. The conservation easement • is comprised of approximately 118.0 acres. Due to design requirements, the aligmvent and resulting right-of--way of Wilson Avenue at the central portion of the project has been adjusted slightly to the north. As depicted in Figures III-1 and III-2, said adjusted alignment encroaches into the Conservation Easement established by the County of San Bernardino. The amount of land impacted by the new aligmvent tota]s 0.45 acres. That portion of the conservation area that has been previously disturbed totals 0.18 acres. Therefore, the net acreage of undisturbed area within the conservation easement is 0.27 acres. The area associated with the aligmvent adjustnent has been altered by the construction of the flood control facilities constructed in Etiwanda Creek by San Bernardino Flood Control Dist-ict. The existing degraded condition of this "adjusted aligtmient" portion of the project site contains no resources of any significance, as discussed in Section C of this chapter. It should be noted that with the adjusted aligmvent to the north a like area to the south will not be developed and will remain as open space, thus the net acreage of open space is not affected. It is determined that the area affected by the adjusted aligmvent and the resulting encroaclvnent into the Conservation Easement does not contain any significant resources and does not result in any significant adverse impact to the long-term viability of the open space and conservation program established by the City's General Plan and thus, no mitigation is required. Level of Impact The impact of the project on open space and conservation is less thazi significant. • It should be noted that subsequent to the dish•ihution of this document, the City is considering a Reduced Lnprovenaent (Alternative C) scope that will avoid impacts to the conservation easement. Alternative C is discussed in Chapter V, Section D. 3., of this document. III-1 September 2011 Wilson Avenue Extension (East) Draft Environmental Impact Report • Figure III-I m c m Q h (0 W • SCALE: 1 "=1( • III-2 March 2009 Wilson Avenue Extension (East) Draft Environmental Impact Report • Figure III=2 Conservation Easement =Road Realignment • • III-3 March 2009 Wilson Avernre Extension (East) Ciry of Rancho Cucamonga Draft ~'nvironrnental bnpact ReRort • B. WATER RESOURCES 1. Water Quality Existing Conditions The quality and safety of drinking water in the United States is regulated by the federal government tlrrough the Envirorunental Protection Agency (EPA). In California, these standards are enforced by the California Department of Health Services. The California Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) is assigned the task of monitoring surface and groundwater quality. The project site is within the Santa Ana River Basin. Much of the water from annual rainfall from surrounding mountains runs off and flows southwest across the valley. This provides surface water supplies for various domestic uses as well as percolating down into the ground to recharge the regional underground water supply. The project site is within the City of Rancho Cucamonga Master Flood Control and Drainage Plan. Surface Water Surface water on the site is generated tluough two sources: precipitation and flow tlu-ough natural drainages. Approximately 90% of the total amoral precipitation in the valley occurs between November • and April. The soils in the area have a relatively high infiltration rate. The quality of surface water depends on the watershed area, land use, location and sources of pollution, and such natural agencies of purification as sedimentation, smilight, aeration, nitrification, filtration, and dilution. Under the authority of the Federal Clean Water Act, the EPA created the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) to conhrol the pollution of urban storm water runoff, which ultimately drains into the ocean, coastal wetlands, or other surface waters. There are two general storm water permits issued under the NPDES, one for industrial activities and one for construction activities. Each industrial facility covered by the general permit must develop and implement a storm water pollution prevention plan. All new construction resulting in disturbance of five or more acres of land also must comply with the requirements of the NPDES permits, and control and reduce discharge of pollutants into the stoma drain system. Additionally, at the time of construction, the project shall prepare Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plans (SWPPP) and implement all applicable pollution prevention measures. General Plan Policies The following are cited as water resources issues: Dependency of long-term growth on non-local sources of water; Decreased replenislunent of groundwater due to low amoral rainfall and over-drafting by local water users; .~ Implementation of water reclamation techniques. III-4 September 201 I Wilson Avw~ue Extension (East) C'ily of Rcu~cbo Cucamonga Draft Em>irornnenta[ Lnpact Report u Threshold for Determining Significance Appendix G of the CEQA Guidelines indicates that significant impacts on water quality can be expected if implementation of the proposed project will violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements; create or contribute runoff water which would provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff or substantially degrade water quality. Projcct Dnvironmental Impacts/Relationship to Gcneral Plan Policies Slror•t-Tenn Construction activities within the project area may contribute to organic pollutants, in the form of dust and particulate-generation, during the construction of infrastructure and improveme~rts. However, this impact is considered less than significant because of the temporary natw•e of construction activities and the ability to mitigate its effects tluough run-off control. All construction activities will be subject to provisions under the NPDES implemented by the RWQCB. A Notice of Intent must be filed prior to the start of construction, and the project developer(s) will be required to comply with the RWQCB's construction runoff permitting regulations. Project construction will be performed consistent with City of Rancho Cucamonga requirements and standards. Water conservation will be incorporated in design of landscaping and irrigation systems. Long-Tenn The proposed road extension is consistent with and will assist in the implementation of the City General Plan. The project is an interim step in improving Wilson Avenue which will create long-term benefits in terms of reducing vehicle miles traveled and thus result in incremental environmental benefits from reduced emissions. Vehicular use of streets and roadways have the potential to discharge pollutants into the storm drains and sewers. Typical pollutants may include fertilizers and pesticides used on landscaping; oils and other vehicle fluids contained in street runoff, etc. The level of potential discharge cannot easily be estimated. This project can be expected to generate levels similar to other urban development. Impacts may be considered adverse since the project will contribute to pollutant and particulate loads in surface and groundwater. Storm water discharge permits will include provisions for spill prevention and response procedures, consistent with the RWQCB's permitting requirements. Such releases are anticipated to be rare and can be controlled; therefore, associated impacts are considered less than significant. Development of the proposed project will increase the amount of impermeable surfaces (i.e., paved roadways, sidewalks, etc.). This is expected to increase the amount of run-off occurring on the site. Flow rates off the site would also be increased. However, both City of Rancho Cucamonga and San Bernardino County Flood Contrrol policies require that projects not increase the net outflow rates or • volmme from a given site. To satisfy this requirement, development will include systems ofstorm-drains and detention basins, where needed, to regulate off-site flow to pre-construction levels. III-5 September 2011 Wilson Avenue Extension (East) City of Rancho Cucamonga Draft Environmental hnPact Report • All projects proposing construction activities, including cleaning, grading, or excavation, that result in the disturbance of at least five acres total land area, or activity which is part of a larger common plan of development of five acres or greater, shall obtain the appropriate NPDES construction permit and pay the appropriate fees. All development within the project boundaries shall be subject to future requirements adopted by the City to implement the NPDES program. Additionally, all discharges to surface waters and groundwater will comply with the goals of the most current applicable Water Quality Control Plate for the Santa Ana River Basin Region. Mitigation Measures Compliance with local, regional and State water quality standards and regulations as well as implementation of approved water quality measures will minimize the impacts of development of the proposed project. Therefore, no mitigation measures are required. Level of Impact Incorporation arzd implementation of the above regulations and water quality measures will reduce project impacts to water quality to below the level of significance. • 2. Drainage and Hydrology The propose of this section is to evaluate the drainage conditions of the project area and to develop a drainage plate that would provide the project area with improved drainage and flood protection from the once-in-a-hundred-year flood. Project Site and Drainage Area Overview Etiwanda Creek is the major drainage course that traverses the project area. The City of Rancho Cucamonga Master Plan of Drainage and the San Bernardino County Flood Control District have implemented and constructed a system of charnels and h'aitung dikes to intercept and convey the tributary flows. Existing Facilities Etiwanda Creek Flood Control Chamtel, Etiwanda Debris Basin and small culverts under the currently unimproved Wilson Avenue exist near and within the project area. Hydrology The drainage patterns and hydrological conditions of Etiwanda Creek will not be impacted by the proposed project. Drainage flows that travel under the existing raised roadbed of unimproved Wilson Avenue will contuiue. The primary flows of Etiwanda Creek will be conveyed under Wilson Avenue via ~' the fully improved charnel that currently exists artd crosses raider the existing raised roadbed. III-6 September 2011 Wilson Avenue Exteruion (East) City of Rancho Cucamonga Draft Em~ironnser7tal bnpact Report ,~ Mitigation Measures Compliance with local, regional and State flood control standards and regulations as well as construction, installation and mahitenance of the improvements and mechanisms designed to minimize and mitigate said impacts as described in this section, includn~g underground stone drains, detention basins, water quality basins and debris basins, will reduce the impacts associated with drainage to a less than significant level. Therefore, uo mitigation measures are required. Level of Impact Incorporation and implementation of the above regulations and improvements will reduce project impacts to drainage to below the level of significance. C. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES The analysis of impacts on biological resources focused on vegetative habitats that could support sensitive animal species and the San Bernardino Kangaroo Rat, an endangered species. A Focused Botanical Survey of the project site was performed by Tom Dodson & Associates Inc., (TDA) in May of 2007. Background research included a search of the California Natural Diversity Database (CNDDB) for the Rancho Cucamonga, California and adjacent 7.5-minute United States Geological Survey • (USGS) quadrangles. The CNDDB is a database of sensitive species and vegetation conununities which rarilcs the overall condition of species and plant communities on global and state levels. Sensitive species information was reviewed from standard reference works, field guides, existing literature. Plant community designations are based on Holland (1986). A complete copy of the Focused Botanical Survey is contained in Technical Appendix C to this EIR. It should be noted that subsequent to the distribution of this document, the City is considering a Reduced hnprovemerat (Alternative C) scope that will reduce impacts to biological resources. Alternative C is discussed in Chapter V, Section D. 3, of this document. 1. Summary of Existing Conditions and Climate The project site lies on the Etiwanda Creek alluvial fan at the base of the San Gabriel Mountains in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Site elevation is approximately 1,820 feet above mean sea level. The climate in this area is characterized by hot summers and mild winters. Rainfall in the local area, which occurs almost entirely in the winter and early spring, averages approximately 19 inches armually. Average temperatures range from 38 degrees Fahrenheit in January to an average of 97 degrees Fahrenheit in July. Winds generally occur with onshore winds fi-om the west/southwest occurring during daylight hours. At night, wind patterns reverse with an offshore flow generally coming from the easbnortheast. • The predominant vegetation existing on the project site at the time of the survey was characterized by Holland community types which are indicated by species dominance. III-7 September 201 I l~ilson tlvenue Extension (East) Draft Envirom~zeiltal Impact Report City of Rancho Cucamonga • Riversidean alluvial fan sage scrub (RAFSS) and nona~ative ruderal were two Hol]and connnunity types noted in the project area. RAFSS is a regionally significant habitat type generally confned to river and creek floodplains of southern San Bernardino and northwest Riverside counties. RAFSS provides habitat for a variety of wildlife species, most of which are conunon, widespread and observed in several community types. RAFSS habitat type also supports a wide variety of regionally sensitive flora and fauna which are unique to this region. Approximately 40% of the project site is comprised of highly disturbed RAFSS connnunity. 2. Habitat The majority of the 12.68-acre project site is comprised of an earthen raised roadbed. An unimproved diet road (Wilson Avenue) exists and provides private access to the Etiwanda Creek Chamlel improvements. The remainder of the site consists of undeveloped land vegetated with a mosaic of Riversidian sage scrub (RSS) and non-native a~mual grasslands. 3. Vegetation and Plant Communities Plant connnunilies Plant communities do not receive threatened or endangered status under the State and Federal • Endangered Species Act. However, rare and sensitive habitats can be considered signifcaut resources under CEQA. Additionally, particular habitat types are sometimes protected when they are associated with tlu'eatened or endangered species. The California Department of Fish and Game (CDFG) designates habitat types as sensitive if they are rare or factors exist that tlu'eaten the continued existence of that habitat type. The project site is vegetated primarily with highly disturbed Riversidean alluvial fan sage scrub (RAFSS) with dominance primarily by nou-native species such as Hirschfeldia incana (Mediten'anean Hoary Mustard), Brassica tournefortii (Asian mustard), Erodium cicutaria (Filaree) and Bromus spy. (Biome grasses). A total of forty plant species were identified within the project area (Table III-1). Fifteen (38%) of the forty species identified, were non-native and accounted for a majority of the existing coverage. Common native species on the project site included Eriogomm~ fasiculatum (California buckwheat), Lotus scoparium (Deer weed), and Astragalus pomonensis (Pomona milk vetch). No special status species were found to occur on the project site. Soils are mapped as approximately 30% Psamments and Fluvents which are frequently flooded, 2% Soboba gravelly loamy sand with 0-9% slopes and approximately Soboba stony loamy sand with 2- 9%slopw. The result of the investigation is that no State of Federally listed endangered or threatened plant species were observed during the field survey. • III-8 September 2011 ,• 00 S O CS U U O V O ~. • U .,. Y O h ~ n W ~ o R h 'r r ~ V V W~ ,~. • ~ i ~ w O ~a~q ~ Y rn rUn y N Y [d N 'O y6 N 'O vUi y U U U N U U U U U U -' .. ~ a= ~ a = V Y YC ~ . N 7 N 7 cG a'i d . cC .. O cC n O ~ ~ ~ ~ c ~ ~a ; ~ ~ ~ ~ U v~ °~ U ~ N °~ .~ ° U Z Z Z Z c: ~. ~ a a ° Z Z f" p r -'_" W N O T ~~ F i ' ., y r ~., N C p p U N N O .. U~ ~ O '~ N ,-U CS ~ ~ 3 ~ ~ V fn ~+ a a ~ ~ p U ... ~ ~--i p ~ ~ ~ ., vi U W U U U M a ° ^ N o ~ ~ ~ ~ 3 ~ r ~ ~ U ai m ~ N -o a ~ O ~ N O ~ U~ oo w v~ U N o >, on ~ r cs C W cA ~ ~ R, yam„ ~ 'C¢ .-. O O ~ ~ i+ O N ~ ~ ~' .U., N ~ c3 c~ p O ~ O o ~ y >, ~ SZ u , >~ .U• ~ C .. ~ O '"' ~ ~ N N vi 3 0 y ~ ~ A ~ _ U O ~ ~' O 'L ~ ~ . ~ vi ; ~ '6 ~ N ~ iC O ~ + ' ¢' 7 `~ N y ~ o N w 3 r ~ '~ ~ ~ ~ N . Y N '" ~ o ~ .~' ~ a ~ .~ ~ ~ ~'~ ~ ~ ~ ~' >, F Gov : oo c ~ ~ ~" p C7 ~ ~ ~ ~ O o v~ ~ O ' ~ ° q ° > ~ ° C7 ~3 0 0 ., N o N M ~ b ~ ~ ~ ~ c3 ~ c~C -~ ~" ~ .~+ rUp `~ ~ RS rn ~ U O ~ +" c~ G O C O c3 cC ~= C ~ p r N O 3 ~ i O N ~ y y ~ in U ^^. ~ N U Y. n cue 'a 'v '~ ~ ~ ~ 9 O .N o ~ a ~ ~ ~° o .'_. ~ ~ W U O ~ b '~ , q N U N CQ y ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ U ~ ~ '~ O O S7 a ~ N N m p ~ ~ c'3 c C m = ~ o a i c S • ~ ~ ~. ~ A ai U' ~' v 3 U 3 • ¢' ~ U U > cn 3 ~ ° U ~ ' ~ ~ ° ti w° 4 . P~I ~ M r-. N N N ~ U a'i a'i a5 co ai M ai 0.i v~ v~ w z w z z z z z ~ N b i b ¢ b a a Q ~ ~ w v~ w 'z w z 'z z z z -' r NO ~A 3 ' CC 'b N c3 ~ N ;-=: N U N ~ ~ tC P ,G i ~ o c3 o o ~ ~ N ^ N ^ n ~ ., N . "~ fn ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ >l OJ Y U O r~ ~ z ~ v z ~ ~ a ~ a •~ 3 ~ ~a N C~ ^, ~ ~ ~' ~ 'y !d a . . CJ X c3 U ~ z U ~° ~ y ~ a ~ ~ ~ = > U '' ~ ~ ~ O ~ ~ O > N Y ~ O N r '3 • T ""~ ~ O cd ~ ~ ,+ ,~ ~ .~ .N, ~ c i. A ~ ~ ,~ .^. y ~ "O ~ O ~ '~j O .~ ' 'p ,~ ~ N O 'V ~ ~ N ~ cC cd r3 ~ ~ .C ~3 ~ cd ~ `~ 'N c 0 N s, N P ~• M O O C 0 •U 0 y~ ~ ~ W v Q o '~ m ~ ti W ~ ~ti ~o ~_ ? ? r w O O 6 Q ~'i .~i fti Y .Ci N _ ~ N b ~ _ ~ ~~ N y _ ~ N ~p ~ ~ b y .o '~ ai ~ a 'v e~ 3 '- :n 'U ai ~ o ~ '~ a is c~a ~ ~ '-' O 7 . id ~ ~ ~ a ~ o ~ a ~ ~ ~ ¢' c ~ ~ ~ 'a c ~ a. c a C7 a1 " i ~J O }' c0 v i .. O "' ro .. O ~ v i O y U a ~ ~~~ ~ J Np .N ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ ti ~ ~ Y ~ j U z Q'1 ~. O z ~I ~ O O z ^ ~1~ O ~I .~ O fy N O w° `^o p O '. ~n M b~ C N N ~ ~ > ~ C vl a3 bq C) u O' t3 U rn C U O ~ C O l~ c~' G ~, ~ _~ vi O~ U U U N r+ b M O U r. i L . .. 0 U L Cn am U U ~ O N O °~ G .= .= ~ y . . . b.~ ca l~ U O C O .~ ` .n oU0 O ^ c3 P ~ O in ~ h . ~. ~, ti ~ ~ P. ~ ? . b ~ ~ a ~ ~ 3 y Y ~ y O Vl ~ ~ p ~ "~ N ~ ~ ~ b r 1-i Y-i om O U ~ O ~_ ~ T N t . u L ' ' b ~ c3 ~ rn U N ~ ~ ~ ^d ON O U r 'C C " i. W b O ~ N ~ O O `.~ iC ~O ,- . ~ O ~ C ~ O N ~ ~ f O ~ ~-. >. Q ~ 3 C n ~ to O ~ a~ ~. 5b~ ~ ~n ~ ~b ~~ ~~ . U .~ 7 9 ~ ~ U~ ~ r N ~ Q N ~ U N ~ y O ~ ~ V C N U ~ 4, a 7 ^~ .-. O, . rr ~ ~ t0 cNd Yy" U w ~ N ~ ~ y N ti ~ U f" N ~ ~ ~ N W A ~ ~. v~ O rn U O D U .dJ ~ .^. Q O O W y O U U O U ~ p 4 'C3 y y " ~, ~ ~ W U N ~ r ~ ~ O ~" ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ •o ti ~ °~ o° rob ro ° ~ ti w ~ ~ L ~~v td e ~ . r ~s ~ a cC RS . .~ a o P ~ ~ r ~ r c o 3 ~ ~ ~ ~ T . .. ~ ~ .~ ~ ~ O t3 r.+ C7 U° U ~ U> cn U vii .° ° U 3 U a ° ~ 'i 8 ° w .'til N N .-+ M N N z U oa r.~ a~ ai ai ai a ai ~ e ~ -o d -b d d d d ~ ~ ~, w z w z z z 'z ~ d y ~ w o w w z w z z z z b :. b ,~ .. ~. nt ~ ~ . ai ~ ~ ~ ~ ~' ~ ' ~ ,~ o 3 :: ~ ~° w "c ~ . o •~ cn ^ ^ U c~ ~ O ~ rn ~ ~ Q' ~ ~' O ~ 3 ~+ O ~ ~ o a ~ x 'J -d ~ " ~; ~ ~ ~ c c~ i a ~ v °" O ~ d -~• v p 3 ~ U ° n ai ~ p C1. Q ~ c ~ - ~ . . ~ . -1 8 ~ •' - N N r N N r+ ~ ~~" ~ ~ V ~ ~ '~ rn a > :. a O N N Y • ~4 O C U s 0 s G '~' 0 ~, • U s ti C ~' W, v ti r~ W ~ o .= >? O c,~-~ '~_ V + y N ^ ro m ~- ro cs m m y r a a a ~ a a ~ .D c d td c d c3 c 3 ~ z z z z z z z z o o ~ o G r O U b ~ _ ' y <d ~ fD vi C ~ .~ ~ O cn ' ~ C ~ r3 ~ y ~ U O N ~~ C N O r3. ~ cti O C hU.p U N 00 cd ~ ~ .~^. N cJ L vi T 'O "`y-. V1 ~ ~ ~ h 00 vUi 'C ~ 'b ~, U C ~ C G\ O ~ ~ v1 O O c3 ~ .". O om C ~ ~ c1 M ~ O b U CA '-. N v-, ~ ' ~ 3 ., ~ O ° y P. iii U ~ ~ ti ~, o ~ T .ti ~ O U ~ .y O .-~ ~ ~ ~ pp V b N ~ O ~y ~ N O o0 's:. ~. O O >, N O ~~ . o ~ C ^ Q ~U-, ~~• ~ Q O °U U1 ~ • ~ x op O b ^ . O --~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 3 >, ~ ~ ~; ~ U '~ a ~ ~ ~ ° ~$ o ~ U ~ ~ r -d +r o g ~ ~ o ~ >, -o ~ v ~ ~ o b :~ 3 0 ~ cC ~ W -~" P 'Cf CL ~ O > vii ~ ~ vNi O ~ r~ ¢, ~ ~ ~ a ~ ~ a ~ ° ° h ~ m .~ ° . ~ cp ~ ~ cp ~ n. r m v a ~ ~ o~ ~ a ~ ~~ ~ °~ a 3 ~ i s N o i i ro s o .~ i~ . C-I N M M M N U ttl :n cci d p 0.1 !~ N m y o s a d ~ d Q d ' d d d ~ ~ z z z z z z z z ~ ~ w v~ z z z z z z z z b ~ ~ r ~ c3 O ~ U by p U ~ ~ N ~ O ti '~ ~ ~ ~ ~ • ~ N ~, ~ C ~. .D ~ ^ N U ~ T T U ~ ~. ~ ~ ~ O d N ~ ~ ^ .~ bD y ~ c3 O y p U ~ U ~ L ~ ee ^ ~ C3 ~ . ~ ahi ~ .;, o P ~ ._ " ~ 9 ^ rn ~ a, -o ~, a. ~ a, c ~ a a rn c~ ~ ~ -a ~ ~ •~ ~ ~ ~ ~ z ~ ' ~ ~ ~ ~ U ~ ~ U ~, Y mo ( ~ U f •y ~ ~ ~ ~ LJ J b '~ (S ,'Uy ~ ' I CS ~ ~ N '~` ~ U '~' ~ ~ ~ _ ~ ~ ~ r cp ~ c3 n ° p > U ~ ~ ~ U O ~ O .' ' ~ O ,U_ O_ ~ '6 O O N N a C ,~ G O CS U U 0 U 0 ~, • U i O ti y h U w~ ~ y o~ ~~ ~~ ~~ so z .~ ~w ;`_: V ~q ~. e 0 0 ~ z u ~, 0 b ~ CV m s. ~ ~ R ti y w ~ F cs m L ~ ~ -o ~ ~ U a".+ -~ .N Y ~Jy Vj b ~ .T U U s. ~ . ~ ~ N ~ ~ q ~n N c h c~. o a ~ ~ ~, C ~. a i ~ y 3'~ ~ O w b .$ ~ 3 -cam . ~ ~ ~ ~ O cs ~ ? ~ o ~„ -o U :~ :e a`i 3 N y -o° ro v ~ ~ ~ O o , W N U ~ . h . ~ ro ~ ~ ~ z ~ L y ,~ ro ~ Q w n Z 0 L b Q '~^~ 7 U C s. ~ C ~+ ~ ea . L ~ ~ e ~ a ~~ ~~ v~ cs 8 ~ z ~~ ~. °, .~ w ~ .o ~u >, V1 ~ v .-y O N A N Wilson Avenzre Extensiaz (East) City of Rancho Cucamm~,;a Draft Environmental Lrrpact Report • 4. Wildlife and Sensitive Species Sensitive Species nnrl Habitat Types San Bernardino Kangaroo Rat A protocol presence/absence trapping survey was conducted by Tom Dodson & Associates (TDA) for the federally-listed endangered Sau Bernardino Kangaroo Rat (Dipodomys merriami parvus) (SBKR). The project site falls witlrin the historic range of SBKR and within habitat deemed critical for this protected species. The protocol live-trapping survey on the project site was conducted in April 2007. The purpose of the survey was to determine the presence or absence of SBKR within the project site, evaluate their re]ative abundance and breeding status and to map the location of captured SBKR. No SBKR individuals were captured. Trapping results show that SBKR do not cun'ently occupy the site and therefore will not be affected by the road extension project. The full report is located in Appendix A of this document. Regional Preservation Efforts • Conservation >;asement As discussed in Section A of this Chapter, a conservation easement was established by the County of San Bernardino Flood Control District as part of the permitting process for the detention basins, debris basins and flood control facilities constructed in Etiwanda Creek north of and adjacent to the project site. The southern boundary of the conservation easement abuts the northern boundary of the project site. Said easement is depicted in Figure III-1. The primary objective of the easement is to conserve and protect the various sensitive pairt species that exist and provide potential habitat for sensitive animal species. The conservation easement is comprised of approximately ] 18.0 acres. Due to design requirements, the alignment and resulting right-of-way of Wilson Avenue at the cenCral portion of the project has been adjusted slightly to the north. As depicted in Figures III-1 and III-2, said adjusted alignment encroaches into the Conservation Easement established by the County of San Bernardino. The amount of land impacted by the new aligrmreut totals 0.45 acres. The area associated with the aligrwient adjustment has been altered by the construction of the flood control facilities constructed iu Etiwanda Creek by San Bernardino Flood Control District. The existing degraded condition of this "adjusted alignnent" portion of the project site contains no resources of any significance, as discussed in Section C of this chapter. It should be noted that with the adjusted alignment to the north a like area to the south will not be developed and will remain as open space, thus the net acreage of open space is not affected. It is determined that the area affected by the adjusted alignment and the resulting encroaclmient into the • Conservation Easement does not contain any significant resources and does not result in any significant adverse impact to the Iona term viability of the sensitive or endangered biological resources and thus, no mitigation is required. III-l 3 September 20 ] I Wilson Avenz~e Extension (East) Ciq~ of Rancho Cz~camonga Draft Envirownental Impact Report Regulatory Environment Endangered Species Act The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USPWS), under the auspices of the federal Endangered Species Act (Act), protects endangered and tlueatened species (listed species). Endangered species are defined as a species in "danger of extinction tluoughout al] or a significant portion of its range" while a threatened species is "likely to become endangered in the foreseeable future." "Take" of a listed species is prohibited under Section 9 of the Act. "Take" includes the killing, harming, or harassing of a species, and destruction of habitat that results in death or injury to listed species by significantly impairing behavior patterns such as breeding, feeding, or sheltering. "Take" of listed species incidental to otherwise lawful activities can be permitted by the Service. Procedures for obtaining a permit for incidental take are identified under Section 7 of the Act for federal actiars and Section 10 for non-federal actions. Clean Water Act The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) has jurisdiction over wetlands and waters of the United States under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. • California Endangered Species Act (CESA) definitions of endangered and tlueatened species parallel those of the federal Act. Endangered species are those in "serious danger of becoming extinct'' and tlueatened species are those "likely to become an endangered species in the foreseeable firtw-e" according to Sections 2062 and 2067, respectively, of the Fish and Game Code of California (Code) (CDFG 1997). "Candidate species" are species that are under formal review by the CDFG for addition to the endangered or tlueatened species list (Section 2067 of the Code)(CDFG 1997). The CDFG designates species as being of special concern prior to their consideration for protected status. Species of special concern are those species for which the CDFG has information indicating that the species is declining. Species of special concern are not specifically protected under the CESA. Migratory Bird Treaty Act The U.S. Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA), originally enacted in 1918 protects all native birds, as well as their nests, eggs, and feathers. The MBTA makes it unlawful, except as specifically authorized under statute, to "pursue, hunt, take, capture [or] kill" any migratory bird, egg or nest thereof. The term "take" is broadly defined to include disturb as ~~ell as wound, kill, capture, trap, collect and molest. It is illegal to disturb active nests during the breeding of a species. The US Fish and Wildlife Service maintains a list of migratory birds that are subject to protection under the MBTA. City of 12ancho Cucamonga General Plan Policies • With regard to biological resources, the primacy goal of the City is the management of rare, endangered and candidate species and their habitats tluough appropriate and accepted preservation programs. Ill-14 September 2011 DVilson Avenue Extension (East) City of Rancho Cucamonga Draft F.rrviromrrental Impact Report • The City will evaluate the sensitivity and value of natural resources within a proposed development site on a case-by-case basis, pursuant to CEQA guidelines and processes. In identifying the potential impacts to biological resources, the City will determine what mitigation measures, if any are appropriate, including participation in habitat conservation programs, establishment of buffers around a resource, and preservationin-place/avoidance. Threshold for Determining Significance According to the CEQA Guidelines, project impacts to biological resources are considered significant if it would: 1. Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or tluough habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the CDFG or USFWS. 2. Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural conununity identified in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the CDFG or USFWS. 3. Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by section 404 of the federal Clean Water Act (including, but not lnnited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc. • wetland types) tluough direct removal, filling, lrydrological interruption, or other means. 4. Lrterfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites. 5. Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance. 6. Conflict with the provisions of an adopted HCP or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan. Project Impacts Project impacts on biological resources are considered limited due to the extensive existing and historical degradation of native habitats on-site. As illustrated in Figure III-3, the project will have impacts on habitat as follows: • Temporary impacts on approximately 3.82 acres of ]and. A restoration plan will set forth requirements to restore this area to current conditions; • Approximately 6.87 acres of permanent impacts, 0.27 of which are located within the County of San • Bernardino Conservation easement discussed in Section A of this Chapter; • Existing permanent impacts affect 0.62 aces of the project site; III-15 September 2011 Wilson ~1ve~n~e Extension (East) Cil~~ ofRancho C.ucanior~ga Draft EnvironmenKd bnpacl Report • Approximately 1 S7 acres of the project site has been previously disturbed and thus may represent a resource of reduced value, 0.18 of which are located within the County of San Bernardino Couservatiou easement discussed in Section A of this Chapter. Relative to plants and vegetation, there are no probable impacts to tln'eateued, rare or endangered or unique species either listed of proposed to be listed by a Federal or State agency, or the Califomia Native Plant Society. Short-term effects to avifauna from habitat loss, construction activities, and human presence will be made less than significant through compliance with the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA). The MTBA prohibits disturbing protected species and their nests during the breeding season. Long-term impacts due to loss of habitat of any listed species known to be present on the site will be mitigated through compliance with section 7 or section 10 (a) of the Federal Endangered Species Act and section 2081 of the Ca]ifornia Endangered Species Act. Loss of riparian habitat is regulated by the California Deparhuent of Fish & Game (CDFG) when the habitat supports native wildlife species. Mitigation of habitat loss is addressed through the Str'eambed/Lake Alteration Agreement process, defined in Section 1603 of the California Fish and Game Code (Ref. B-27). Impacts to waters of the United States and wetlands, as defined by the federal Clean Water Act (CWA), • are under the jurisdiction of the U.S. Anny Corps of Engineers (ACOE). Prior to altering a water or wetland of the United States, permits under Sections 401 and 404 of the CWA will be required. The ACOE typically requires mitigation for any loss of waters or wetlands. CWA section 401/404 permits will be obtained prior to development. The proposed project will require permits for effects to areas under ALOE and/or CDFG jurisdiction However, disturbances to many of the minor drainages on-site are not likely to result in substantial adverse impacts to fish and/or wildlife resources, as defined in Section 160] of the California Fish and Game Code. A Section 1603 permit from the CDFG may not be necessary for these areas. \J III-] 6 September 2011 • Wilson Avenue Extension (East) Draft Environmental Lnpact Report City of Rancho Cucamonga Figure III-3 Project Biological Impacts ~u ~ z Qa;~r Wl9.1 ~u 8sg *~' QW ; yyii- %y. x-1-5 "o Y • W Y ~ Y ~ Y OC o n N ~ ~ Q ~ O - . ~j ~ 1 €~ a ~~ s ~ ~ D ~ ~a ~ Z ~ ~~ ~ g Y N ~ J t/ g~ g _~ ~S a • III-17 March 2010 Wilson Avenue Extension (Easi) Draft Environmental Lnpact Report City of Ruilcho Cucamonga Mitigation Measures The following measures will be incorporated into the project to reduce impacts on biological resources: BIO-1 Consultation shall occur between the City and the Army Cops of Engineers (ACOE) as well as the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) to determine the permitting requirements for the project. The City will comply with any additional considerations unposed on the project applicant in the permit, agreement and certification. BIO-2 Post-construction activities shall result in the restoration, eiil~ancement and protection of the remaining existing habitat. BIO-3 A Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) is required. Said SWPPP shall identify methods to be utilized to protect water quality during construction of the project. BIO-4. Prior to any incidental take of a federally listed species, the developer will obtain a section 10(a) permit or enter into Section 7 consultation with the USFWS, or comply with the terns of regional 10(a) ESA permit. Additionally, prior to any incidental take of astate-listed species, the developer will obtain a section 2081 permit from the California Department of Fish and Game. BIO-5. A qualified biologist shall be retained as a conshuction monitor to ensure that incidental construction impacts on biological resources are avoided. The monitor shall: conduct pre-grading field surveys for special-status plant and wildlife species that maybe impacted as a result of construction and/or site preparation activities; attend pre-grading meetings with the contractor to ensure that the timing and location of construction activities do not conflict with mitigation requirements including seasonal surveys for plants and wildlife and avoidance of preserved native areas; mark the conshuction area adjacent to preserved native areas in the field with the contractor in accordance with the final approved grading plan; and periodically visit the site during construction to coordinate and monitor compliance with the above mitigation measures. BIO-6. Prior to conshuction or site preparation activities in an area during the nesting season of native bird species potentially nesting on the site, a field survey shall be conducted by a qualified biologist to determine whether active nests of special-status, or common bird species protected by the Migratory Bird Treaty Act and the California Fish and Game Code are present in the construction zone or within 50 feet (300 feet for raptors) of the construction zone. If active nests of protected birds are found, a fence bar-ier shall be erected aromrd the nest site at a distance as determined by the biologist. No construction activities shall be ~ permitted within this nest zone until the young birds have fledged, as determined by the biologist. III-18 September 2011 Wilsotx Avenue Extension (East) Cily of Rancho Cucamonga Draft Environmental Impact Report ,• BIO-7. Immediately prior to construction or grading activities in an area, a qualified biologist to determine whether individuals of coastal California gnatcatcher occur within the conshuction or grading zone shall conduct a habitat assessment survey. If located, gnatcatchers shall be captured and translocated unharmed into areas of appropriate habitat (either on-site or itmnediately offsite) that are not subject to disturbance. Level of Impact After Mitigation The above mitigation measures will reduce project-related impacts to biological resources to a less than significant level. D. GEOLOGY AND SOILS Regional Geologic Setting As does the entire City of Rancho Cucamonga, the project site is situated on a gently sloping alluvial plain that is part of a single geologic unit known as the "Perris Structural Block." This plain is composed of alluvial or stream-carried materials deposited by the streams and water courses flowing out of the San Gabriel Mountains just north of the City. • Slope Stability The project site and sunrounding environs are not subject to landslides or slope failure. Faulting A discussion of faults in California should be prefaced with a discussion of legislation and state policies concerning the classification and laud use criteria associated with faults. By definition of the State Mining and Geology Board, an active fault is a fault, which has had an earthquake or surface displacement within Holocene time (about the last 11,000 years). The State Geologist has defined a potentially active fault as any fault considered to have been active during Quaternary time (last 2,000 years). This definition is used in delineating Special Studies Zones as mandated by the Alquist-Priolo Geologic Hazards Zones Act of 1972 and subsequently iu 1975 (Appendix A, Reference 8). The intent of this act is to assure that urban development does not occur across the traces of active faults. The subject site is not included within a special studies zone defined by the Alquist-Priolo Act. Seismicity The site can be considered a very active seismic area, as is all of Southern California. Active earthquake faults that could directly impact the project site include the San Andreas Fault, Cucamonga Fault, San Jose Fault, Siena Madre Fault and Red Hill Fault. These faults are not within or adjacent to the project site and the site is not included within au Alquist-Priolo Special Studies Zone. III-19 September 2011 Nilson Anerrzre Extension (East) City of Rancho Cucamonga Draft Em~ironnrerrtal Impact Report u The possibility of severe ground shaking is considered high over the next 50 to 100 years. The most severe seismic shaking would originate from the Cucamonga or Red Hill Faults. The estimated maximum accelerations from a maximum credible earthquake of Ric]rter Magnitude 7.0 on the Cucamonga Fault would range from approximately 0.60 to 0.95. On the Red Hill Fault with a maximum credible earthquake of Richter Magnitude 6.5, the estimated maximum accelerations would range from approximately 0.70 to 0.80. Secondary Effects of Seismic Shaking The following are considered potential secondary effects of an earthquake: ground rupture and flooding. Soils The project site is comprised of coarser-grained, well-drained soils deposited over the alluvial plain at the base of the mountains north of the City. The Hanford-Gree~lfield and Tujung-Soboba soils are the prevalent soils associations affecting the project site. impacts Fault displacement and Ground Rupture • No active faults are laiown to h'ansect the site. Fault displacement due to active faulting is remote and rated as a slight risk. Seismic Grouud Shaking • Proposed road improvements on the site which are not subject to secondary seismic hazards, are expected to perform satisfactorily if designed in accordance with the ]atest Uniform Building Code or Local building codes, whichever has precedence. Grading of the site in accordance with standard soil engineering practice and current code specifications will provide adequate mitigating measw-es with respect to ground shaking. Slope Stability Slope stability constraints are expected to be minimal. Standard grading technologies and compliance with current grading requirements as required by the City of Rancho Cucamonga will mitigate any potential constraints pertaining to slope stability. Expansive Soil Standard grading technologies and comp]iance with current grading requirements as required by the City of Rancho Cucaionga will mitigate any constraints caused by any expansive soils on-site. III-20 September 20] 1 • • • Ihilsors Avenue Extension (East) Draft Errvironrrrerrtal hrrpact Report Soil Characteristics City of Rm~cho Crrcarrzon~a Prior to any development within any area of the proposed development, an overall conceptual grading plan for the project site will be submitted for City approval. Grading will not be permitted prior to approval of grading permits for the development area in question. Prior to initial grading activities, a soils report and geoteclmical study will be performed that fiu-ther analyzes onsite soil conditions. Appropriate measures to control erosion and dust will be specified at this time. Detailed grading plans will be prepared prior to any onsite grading. Ground Water Geoteclmical investigation, prepared prior to issuance of grading permits, will determine conditions and compaction requirements. Fault Displacement and Ground Surface Rupture GEO-1 Standard grading and compaction technologies and compliance with current grading requirements as required by the City will mitigate any constraints caused by exposure to fault displacement and ground surface structure to the extent practicable. Slope Stability GEO-2 All cut and fill slopes shall be landscaped with drought tolerant slope-stabilizing vegetation as soon as possible after grading to minimize erosion potential Irrigation and maintenance shall be the responsibility of the applicant. Provisions to facilitate drainage away fiom tops of slopes and slope faces should be provided in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Grading Policy and Guidelines. Soil Characteristics GEO-3 Grading will be restricted during the rainy season (December-March) to reduce erosion potential and potential sediment transport problems GEO-4 Should fill be proposed in the drainage courses present at the site, the impact of subsurface water accumulating in these depressions may be mitigated by providing adequate subdrainage. Level of Impact After Mitigation The above mitigation measures will reduce project-related impacts to geological resources to a less than significant level. III-21 September 2011 Wilson Ave»ue Exlensiors (East) Cily of Raizcho Cucn»~anga Draft Envb-omnenlnl h»pac! 2e~ort • E. HAZARDOUS MATERIALS Existing Conditions The project site is composed of a raised earthen roadbed that crosses the watershed of Etiwanda Creek. Etiwanda Creek Channel as well as a number of drainage pipes exist under the roadbed and convey flows fiom north to south. Impacts Potential problems posed by the presence of hazardous or toxic materials to onfite or offsite locations are minimal due to the limited area of developed property adjacent to the project site, and the absence of reported storage, utilization, or disposal of hazardous materials on or the vicinity of the project site. It should be noted here that vehicle maintenance procedures commonly implemented during some grading operations have the potential to release hazardous materials. Precautions shall be taken to prevent the release of used motor oil, hydraulic fluid, and/or other hazardous materials to the ground during any future grading operations. These fluids should be stored in containers (such as 55 gallon drums) until they can be transported offsite for proper disposal or recycling. Mitigation • HAZ-1. During the anticipated grading of the property, observations should be made for the presence of toxic or hazardous materials. Should evidence of contamination be identified, further investigations may be required. Level of Impact After Mitigation The above mitigation measure will reduce project-related hnpacts from hazardous materials to a less than significant level F. NOISE Existing Conditions Noise is generally defined as undesirable sound. Noise can be described objectively by a unit of measurement latown as the decibel (dB), which corresponds to the faintest sound detectable by the human ear. The decibel indicates the amplitude or loudness of a particular sound at a given point iu time. An A-weighted decibel (dBA), factored for somrd levels at maximum human sensitivity, is used to more closely simulate the responses of the human ear by de-emphasizing very high and very low frequencies. • As the decibel describes only ashort-term noise occurrence and communities are usually interested in longer-teen ambient noise levels, additional descriptors have been developed. Since community receptors are more sensitive to unwanted noise intrusion at night, State law requires that, for plamring III-22 September 2011 Wilson Avenue Extension (East) City of Rancho Cucai~~onga Draft Em~iromnental L~~pact IZepor•t • pw•poses, au artificial dB increment be added to quiet time noise levels in a 24-hour noise descriptor called the Conmiunity Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL). The CNEL is a logaritlunic scale of average noise levels over a 24-hour period that adds a "penalty" factor to measurements taken between 7:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. The purpose of these measures is primarily to isolate noise sensitive land uses from high levels of noise exposure. Land uses that are most sensitive to noise include residential areas, schools, libraries, motels and hotels, places of worship, hospitals; and nursing homes. Table IILF-1 shows the noise level standards for a variety of land use categories. Noise sources can be described as either point source or non-point source. The former refers to fixed location sources such as roadways, railroads, shopping centers, and manufacturing plants, while the latter includes automobiles, motorcycles, trucks, powerboats, h~ains, and aircrafr. An interior CNEL of 45 dBA is mandated by the State of California Noise Insulation Standards (CCR, Title 24, Section T25-28) for multiple family dwellings and hotel rooms. This standard also applies to single-family home interiors in most California jurisdictions. Since normal noise attenuation within residential structures with closed windows is about 20 dB, an exterior noise exposure of 65 dBA CNEL is generally the noise land use compatibility guideline For new residential dwellings in California. Because conunercial and many industrial uses are not occupied on a 24-hour basis, the exterior noise exposure standard for these less sensitive ]and uses are generally less stringent. The project site is located well outside any airport "noise area." Aircraft noises constitute an occasional • short-term noise inri-usion, but their integrated contribution over a 24-hour CNEL exposure period is small. CEQA guidelines consider a project within two miles of an airport to be potentially noise impacted. • Existing noise levels throughout much of the project area derive almost exclusively from vehicular sources on the highways and secondary roads in the area. llI-23 September 2011 Wilson Avenue Extension (East) Draft Environn~renlcd hnpact Report Ciry of Rancho Cuc•aznozzga Table IILF-1: Noise/Land Use Compatibility Standards • 1/ '1 u LAND USE CATEGORY COMMONITY NOISE EXPOSURE (CNEL, dBA) 55 60 65 70 75 80 Residential Low Density: Single Family, Duplex, and Mobile Homes Residential Higher Density: Multi Family Transient Lodging: ~4otels, 1-lotels Schools, Libraries, Churches, Hospitals, and Nursing Homes Auditoriums, Concert Halls, and Amphitheaters Outdoor Spectator Sports and Sports Areas Playgrounds and Neighborhood Parks Golf Courses, Cemeteries, Riding Stables, and Water Rea~eation Office Buildings: Business. Connnercial, and Professional Industrial, Utilities Manufacturing, and Agri- culture INTERPRETATION NORMALLY ACCEPTABLE NORMALLY UNACCEPTABLE Specified land use is satisfactory, based upon the assumption New construction or development should generally be that any buildings involved are of normal com~entional discouraged. If new construction or development does construction, without any special noise insulation proceed, a detailed analysis of the noise reduction requirements. requirements must be made and needed noise insulation features included in the design. CONDITIONAI-LY ACCEPTABLE ^ CLEARLY UNACCEPTABLE New construction or development should be undertaken only New construction or development should generally not be after a detailed analysis is made and needed noise insulation undertaken. features are included in the design. Conventional construction, but with closed windows and fresh air supply systems or air conditioning will normally suffice. Source: Office of Noise Control, California Department of Health, ]976 III-24 September 2011 Wilson Avenue Extension (Gast) City of Rancho Cucun~onga DrcftE~avirow~zental h~zpact Report • General Plan Policies Noise exposure staudards have been developed by the State of California and recommended for inclusion into the Noise Element of local general plans. "Normally Compatible" noise levels for proposed noise-sensitive specific plan uses (residential, park, school, etc.) extend up to 70 dB CNEL. Although 70 dB CNEL is considered compatible, City policy is to mitigate exterior noise-sensitive land use exposure to 65 dB CNEL where feasible. City General Plan policies establish several mechanisms and teclutiques to minimize the adverse effects of excessive noise. These mechanisms address both stationary and mobile noise sources as well as teclutiques to protect the receptor. Thresholds for lletcrmining Significance Noise impacts would be considered significant if they cause standards to be exceeded, or create a measurable increase in noise levels in an already noisy environment. City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan policy discourages noise sensitive land uses in areas exceeding 65 dBA CNEL and requires those uses to have acoustical studies conducted by a qualified acoustical engineer. Refer to Table IILE-1 for noise/land use compatibility criteria. Sec. 15064 et seq. of CEQA Guidelines list the following noise and/or vibration impacts as potentially significant: • ~ Levels exceeding standards in genera] plans or noise ordinances; Excessive ground borne vibration or ground borne noise; A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels iu the project vicinity above levels existing without the project; A substantial temporary or periodic increase in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project; The terms "substantial" and "excessive" are not defined in the guidelines. Noise levels are generally considered excessive if they violate standards or measurably increase an already loud baseline level. Measurable is a function of human perception thresholds. The typical human only notices a change in the noise environment with noise increases of 3 dB or more. Project Enviromnental Impacts /Relationship to General Plan Policies Two characteristic noise sources are associated with the activities planted for the development of the proposed project htitially, construction activities, especially heavy equipment, will create short-term noise increases on the project site. Upon completion, project-related traffic will result in an incremental increase in area-wide noise levels in the region. III-25 September 2011 Id~ilsori Avenue Extension (East) City of Rancho Cucnrnonga Draft Environmental hnpact Report • Slrort-Term Impacts Construction-related noise will result in changes in ambient noise levels. Impacts are considered short- term since noise will cease upon completion of construction activity. Noise generated by construction equipment, including trucks, graders, bulldozers, concrete mixers, and portable generators, can reach significant levels ranging from 70 dBA to 105 dBA. Level of impact will depend upon several factors, such as: the distance between construction activity and sensitive receptors, the types of equipment used, and the hours of consh~uction operations. The duration and intensity of construction-related noise is regulated by the City through time limits on grading and other heavy equipment operations. Compliance with these limits is generally presumed to create a less than signif cant impact. Site preparation, grading, and construction activities will take place only during daylight hours, or as otherwise permitted by City local regulations and practices, including various restrictions such as time limits on construction involving the operation of powered equipment. All construction-related equipment, either fixed or mobile will be equipped with properly operating and maintained muffler exhaust systems. Stationary equipment will be situated in a manner that will direct emitted noise away from noise sensitive receptors. To ptrotect the health of persons employed at construction sites, hearing protection equipment will be worn in compliance with regulations established by the California Occupational Safety and Health Administration. Long-Tern: Impacts Upon completion, project-related traffic will cause an incremental increase iri area-wide noise levels Uuoughout the area. Long-term noise concerns from the increased urbanization of the project area center primarily on mobile source generators on area roadways. For much of the project site, mitigation of noise is feasible with use of standard mitigation. With the incorporation of the proposed mitigation measures, the project will be consistent with City General Plvi noise standards. Mitigation Measures Slrort-Tern: Impacts The following mitigation measures are proposed to reduce short-term construction-related noise impacts to less than significant levels. NOI-1. Construction operations, which produce the highest levels of noise, shall, to the extent practical, be an-anged to occur togetlier in the construction program in order to avoid continuing periods of greater amtoyance. III-26 September 201 I Nilson Avenue Extension (East) City of Rancho Cucanrongc~ Draft Environmental hnpact Report LJ Level of Impact After Mitigation Implementation of these measures will substantially lessen the short-term impacts. Long-term noise impacts will be less-than-significant levels. The proposed project will contribute incrementally to a cumulative increase in area-wide noise levels. G. AIR QUALITY >sisting Cmrditions Climnte The climate of the Rancho Cucamonga area, technically called au interior valley subclimate of Southern California's Mediterranean-type climate, is characterized by warm sunnners, mild winters, infrequent rainfall averaging 12.5 inches a year, moderate afternoon breezes, and generally fair weather. The clouds and fog that form along the area's coastline rarely extend as far inland as the project site, and if they do, they usually bung off quickly after smn~ise. The regional weather pattern most affecting the site is the warm season airflow across populated areas of the Los Angeles Basin which brings polluted air into western San Bernardino County late in the afternoon. This transport pattern creates unhealthful air quality when the fringes of this resultant "urban smog cloud" extend to the project site during the • smmmer months. Winds are an important parameter in characterizing the air quality environment of a project site because they both determine the regional pattern of air pollution transport and control the local rate of pollution dispersion near the sources. Daytime winds occur generally from the W-NW at 6-8 mph as air moves regionally onshore fiom the cool Pacific Ocean to the wane Mojave Desert interior of Southern California. These winds allow for good local mixing, but they may bring air pollutants from urbanized coastal areas into interior valleys. Strong thermal convection in the smrrmer in the area ultimately dilutes the smog cloud from urbanized development, but the project area is too close to Los Angeles Basin emissions sources to completely avoid the regional air quality degradation resulting from the photochemical airborne reactions that create the summer smog and haze throughout the air basin. Southern California is notorious for strong temperatw•e inversions that limit the vertical depth tlu~ough which pollution can be mixed. These inversions, when coupled with near-calm winds, tend to maximize the impact of any local pollution emissions sources, such as freeways, shopping centers; etc. Air Ouuiiry Management Stnndar•ds National Ambient Air Quality Standards (AAQS) were established in 1971 for six pollutants. Each state was given the option of adding additional pollutants to their standards. These standards represent the levels of air quality considered safe, with an adequate safety margin, to protect the public health and • welfare. They are designed to protect those people most susceptible to further respiratory distress.' III-27 September 2011 bVilson flvenue extension (East) Ciry~ of Rancho G'ucai~~onga Draft Em~irof~mental Impact Report These "sensitive receptors" include asthmatics, the elderly, very yowrg children, people with inunune systems weakened by disease or ilhiess, and people engaged in strenuous work or exercise. Table IILH-1 summarizes existing federal and State AAQS. Included are the recently adopted (1997) federal standards for chronic (8-hour) ozone exposure and for ultra-small diameter particulate matter of 2.5 microns or less (PMz,;). However, enforcement of these new standards is on hold while legal challenges to the Enviromnental Pirotection Agency's (EPA) authority to adopt the new standa~'ds are resolved. The two regional agencies responsible for monitoring regional air quality are the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) and the California Air Resources Board (CARS). The SCAQMD sets and enforces regulations for stationary sow'ces in the basin. The CARS is charged with cmrh•olling motor vehicle emissions. The SCAQMD, in coordination with the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) bas developed an Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP) for the basin. The final AQMP was adopted and released to the public in 1991. The AQMP proposes programs to reduce basin-wide pollutant emissions. The plan is intended to work in concert with SCAG's Growth Management Plan and Regional Mobility Plan, as well as specific measures designed to reduce emissions from transportation and stationary sources. • The AQMP identifies all potential emission control measures, which could be implemented by the year 2007, and to the extent possible, quantifies the emissions reductions. These conh'ol measures are categorized into three tiers, based upon their ability to be implemented. The short-term or Tier I component of the AQMP identifies specific control measures which could be implemented at the present time. The majority of these measures can be adopted within the next five years, prior to the next AQMP update. They consist mainly of stationary source controls including, district rules, and GARB adopted tailpipe emissions standards and performance requh-ements for motor vehicles. Transportation and land use controls and energy conservation measures are also included in the Tier I portion of the plan, to the extent that teclurology is available to accomplish the emissions reduction targets. Tier I control measures may continue up to 2007. Tier II measures involve already-demonstrated control technologies that require advancements that can reasonably be expected to occur in the near future. Tier III goals depend on substantial technological advancements and breaktluoughs that are expected to occur tlnroughout the next two decades. General Plan Policies The City's primary goal is the "achievement of air quality that is conducive to good health and the enjoyment of the area's climate for all citizens, including the elderly, children, and those with respiratory problems." In order to maintain and improve air quality levels within the vicinity of the city limits, the City of Rancho Cucamonga has established in the General Plan an extensive program to manage air quality. This program inc]udes coordination and compliance with all app]icable Federal, ~~ State and Regional Air Quality plans. III-28 September 2011 Wilson Ave»ue Extension (East) City of Kancho Cucamonga Draft Enviromnental bnhact Report Thresholds fm• Determining Significance The SCAQMD gives wide discretion to lead agencies in the assessment of air quality impacts. No clear guidelines have been established for defning "significant" with regard to pollutant emissions. As a matter of practice, SCAQMD indicates that impacts may be considered significant if the amount of pollution generated by the project is substantial and contributes to the degradation of an air basin, or if the project is inconsistent with the AQMP. To assist lead agencies in the assessment of air quality impacts in EIR's, the SCAQMD has developed tlu'esholds of sigilifcance criteria. SCAQMD stresses that the criteria are suggestions only since the lead agency makes the final decision as to whether or not air quality impacts are considered significant. If a project meets these criteria, the lead agency may or may not conclude that a project results in significant air quality impacts. The following criteria are applicable to the proposed project: 1. A project capable of daily emissions of one or more of the following pollutants: Carbon Monoxide 550 lbs. Reactive Organic Gases 55 lbs. (75 lbs./day dm'ing construction) Nitrogen Oxides 55 lbs. (100 lbs./day during construction) Particulates (PMio) 150 lbs. Sulfur Oxides 1501bs. 2. Any facility attracting or generating more than 2,000 motor trips per day (1,000 vehicles in and out). 3. Any General Plan or General Plau Amendment which would provide for increased population growth beyond that projected in the AQMP. 4. Any project interference with attainment of federal or State ambient air quality staztdards by either violating or contributing to an existing or projected air quality violation. 5. Any project that may have or be subjected to objectionable odors. 6. Any project that would result in sensitive receptors near a facility that emits air toxins or near CO hot spots. Air Quality The project site lies within the South Coast Air Basin (SCAB) There has been along-term trend of improving air quality in the South Coast Air Basin since the 1970's. Norivithstanding these significant improvements, the air quality in the region does not meet federal and state air quality standards and continues to raiik near the top of the worst air in the nation. • The Final 2007 Air Quality Management Plan (2007 AQMP) takes steps to reach the clean air goals established by recent new federal standards for fine particles (PM2.5) and S-hour surface level ozone. III-29 September 2011 1Vilson Avenue Gxlension ("East) Cily of Rancho Cucamonga Draft Environmental Impact Rcport • Although maximum annual PM2.5 concentrations have decreased nearly 30 percent since 1999, new federal standards require increased efforts to further reduce concentrations. As stated iu the 2007 AQMP, ``The Final Plan proposes attairunent of the federal PM2.5 standards through amore focused conhrol of sulfur oxides, directly-emitted PM2.~, and nitrogen oxides supplemented with volatile organic compounds by 2015. The 8-hour ozone control strategy builds upon the PM2.5 strategy, augmented with additional nitrogen oxide and volatile organic compowrds reductions to meet the standard by 2024...." As it relates to PM2.5, the 2007 AQMP states that "Since PM2.5 in the Basin is overwhelmingly formed secondarily the overall Final control strategy focuses on reducing precursor emission of SOx, directly- emitted PM2.5, NOx, and VOC instead of fugitive dust." The `secondary' process involves atmospheric chemical reactions which covert gases into microscopically fine particles. Chapter 6 of the 2007 AQMP acknowledges that Section 182 (d)(1)(A) of the Clean Air Act requires the Dish'ict to include transportation conhol shategies so as to offset any growth in emissions from growth in vehicle trips and vehicle miles traveled and attain reduction in mobile source emissions. The suggested programs listed in Section 108(f) of the clean air act include traffic flow improvement projects. The larger project of improving Wilson Avenue from Etiwanda Avenue to Wardman Bullock Road would certainly be considered a traffic flow improvement project. The project considered in this document is a component or `phase' of the larger project and tlurs can be considered part of a traffic • flow improvement project. This project, while it is a piece of a larger efforC which will reduce vehicle miles traveled, will not contribute to a significant reduction in VMT and thus not contribute to a reduction of GHG. Table IILG-1 Governmental Air Quality Oversight Responsibilities • Agency Princi al Responsibilities Environmental Protection Porty-nine state mobile vehicle emission standards Agency (EPA) Airplanes, trains, ships New off-road construction and farm equi meat below 175 hp Air Resources Board (ARB) On-road/off--road vehicles Motor vehicle fuels Consumer products South Coast Air Quality Stationary (e.g., industrial/commercial and area sources Management District Indirect sources (SCAQMD) Some mobile sources(e.g. visible emissions and use regulations from trains and ships) Southern California Association AQMP conformity assessment Of Governments (SLAG) Regional Transportation Improvement Program Transportation Control Measures Local Govenunent/CTC's Transportation and local government actions (i.e., land use ap royals and ports Transportation facilities III-30 September 2011 Wilsors Avenue Exlensio~7 (East) City ofRancha Cucamonga Draft E»vironntental Impact Report • Project Impacts The project is consistent with the General Plan of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, specifically as it relates to the Circulation Element. Projects that are consistent with the local General Plau are considered consistent with the air-quality related regional plan, the 2007 Air Quality Management Pla^ (AQMP) established by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD). Grecnhouse Gas Emissions Summary of Existing Laws and Legislation Assembly Bill 32 (AB 32), the California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006, signed into law in September 2006, requires that the State of California reduce greenhouse gas emissions (GHG) to 1990 levels by the year 2020. It designates the State Air Resources Board as the lead state agency charged with monitoring and regulating sources of emissions of greenhouse gases and with implementing AB 32. As part of this legislation, a Scoping Plan setting forth the State's sh~ategy to achieve the 2020 greenhouse gas emissions limit is required to be prepared by ARB. The proposed Draft Scoping Plan has been prepared and is scheduled to be approved and in place by 2012. On April 13, 2009 the Governor's Office of Plamriug and Research (OPR) released proposed CEQA • Guidelines amendments, pursuant to Senate Bill No. 97 (SB 97). The purpose of the amendments is to address analysis and mitigation of the potential effects of greenhouse gas emissions. The proposed amendments have been developed pursuant to Public Resources Code section 21083.05, which states in part, "On or before July 1, 2009, the Office of Planning and Research shall prepare, develop and transmit to the Resource Agency guidelines for the mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions or the effects of greenhouse gas emissions as required by this division, including, but not limited to, effects associated with transportation or energy consumption." The Natural Resources Agency will conduct a formal rulemaking process which will include additional opportunities for public participation, including public comment periods and public hearings. The Resources Agency is required to respond to all public comments in writing prior to certification and adoption of the CEQA amendments. This process will be completed and all amendments to be made will be certified and adopted by January 1, 2010, as required by Public Resources Code section 21083.05(b). During this time period when the proposed CEQA Guidelines amendments az•e being considered, refined and ultimately adopted, this document intends to establish, in a very general sense, what the proposed project's impact are on greenhouse gas emissions and the effort underway to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Project Impacts on Attainment of State Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reduction Targets ~- The project wider consideration will not in of itself achieve any reduction in greeiiliouse gases in that it will not complete the lirilc between Etiwanda Avenue and Wardman Bullock Road. III-31 September Wilson Avenue Exteaasioaa (East) City of Rancho Cucamonga Draft Environmeaatal hrapact Report • It should be noted that the completion of Wilson Avenue improvements will reduce vehicle miles traveled and thus incrementally assist in the reduction of GHG and other air pollutants. The proposed project can be considered a phase of the overall improvement project of improvements from Etiwanda Avenue to Wardman Bullock Road. Project Environmental Impacts /Relationship to General Plan Policies As discussed earlier in this section, the City's primary goal is the "achievement of air quality that is conducive to good health and the enjoyment of the at-ea's climate for all citizens, including the elderly, children, and those with respiratory problems." The General Plan contains numerous concepts and strategies, which "overlap" into many other General Plan programs such as Land Use, Transportation, etc. The typical development impacts air quality both geographically (local and regional) and temporally (short-term and long-term). On a regional level, anticipated new vehicle trips generated by the proposed project represent a small incremental conh'ibutiou to the basin air pollution burden compared to the regional total Regional, basin-wide air quality impacts are therefore addressed in terms of project compatibility with regional air • quality plans. If a project has been properly incorporated into basin-wide growth projects used for regional air quality and transportation planning, then the basin-wide impact of any proposed development is presumed, by definition, to be less than significant. Locally, changes in the location of automotive sources, or changes in the number of vehicle or travel speeds may impact the microscale air quality around a given development site. Traffic increases not only contribute to air pollutants directly, but they may also reduce existing traffic to slower, less efficient travel speeds. Thus, the development's traffic/air quality impact can be compounded. Short-teen (temporary) emissions due to construction will occur during project buildout. Such emissions include on-site generation of dust and equipment exhaust, off-site emissions from construction employee coamnuting and/or trucks delivering building materials. Because of their temporary nature, air quality impacts from construction are often considered as individually less than significant. Also, exact construction activity emissions are difficult to quantify until the exact type and amount of equipment to be used is known. Therefore, emphasis must be made on minimization of construction emissions a fully as possible through comprehensive mitigation. Short-Term (Construction) bnpacts Temporary iulpacts will result from project construction activities. Air pollutants will be emitted by construction equipment, and dust will be generated dw'ing grading and site preparation. Dust is norn~ally the primary concern during grading and construction of new buildings and infrastructure. Because such emissions are not easily collected or controlled, they are called "fugitive emissions." Emission rates vary as a function of many parameters, such as soil silt, soil moisture, wind speed, area disturbed, nwnber of vehicles, depth of disturbance, etc.). III-32 September 2011 Wilson Arenue Extension (East) City of Rancho Crrccrnaorzgcr Draft Em~irorunental Impact Report Calculations of construction activity emissions for this project were based on the SCAQMD 1993 CEOA Air Quality Handbook. The predicted total daily construction emissions potentially occun-ing on the project site are shown in Table IILH-1. The calculations were based on "worst-case" assumptions. The actual daily rates will depend greatly on individual project phasing within the project site. For large- sized projects, construction activities are a major contributor to PMio non-attaimnent in the Basin. Tlms, The project "will likely create a temporarily significant PMto impacf' by exceeding the 150 pounds per day threshold. Further, they conclude that without enforceable limits on the size of the daily disturbance footprint, PM~o emissions during portions of project development can likely not Ue maintained at sub- significant threshold levels. However, due to their size and chemical composition, fugitive emissions of construction dust represent more of a potential soiling nuisance (due to settling on cars, streets, landscaping, etc.) than an actual health hazard. With the low population density downwind of the project site, dust nuisance potential will not be sigtficant. Any nuisance potential will tend to be highly localized when anew tract is built in close proximity to an already completed development. Additionally, dust control measures will be implemented to minimize dust generation during clearing, grading and construction. Measures may include (as applicable) techniques such as: application of water or surfactants during ground-disturbing activities; early paving or hip-sealing of access roads; hydro seeding of exposed surfaces; or, reseeding larger tracts before residential occupancy. Also, soil-disturbing activities would not occur during periods of high winds (over 25 miles per hour) when effective dust control is extremely difficult. • Because of prevailing NW to SE winds, building out the site in a NW to SE direction can minimize localized nuisance potential Soiling nuisances can also be minimized by performing mass grading and subsequent reseeding of larger tracts before any residential occupancy to reduce later heavy equipment operations near already occupied dwellings. However, very large-scale mass grading can create high regional PM~o emissions that offset any localized nuisance reduction benefit. • Exhaust emissions will result from on- and off-site heavy equipment The types and numbers of equipment will vary among contractors and catmot be quantified with certainty. Typical emission rates from the SCAQMD Air Quality Handbook for conmronly used construction equipment are provided in Table IILH-1. This table represents a "worst case" scenario. The table shows that NOX emissions may exceed the SCAQMD significance threshold. However,'the mobile nature of the on-site construction equipment and off-site ri-ucks will prevent any nricroscale violation of the NOX or other standards. There may be localized instances when the characteristic diesel exhaust odor is noticeable from passing trucks or nearby heavy equipment, but such h•at~sitory exposure is a brief nuisance and will not tln-eaten air quality standards. Controlling construction routes to reduce interference with non-project traffic patterns and to preclude truck queuing or idling near sensitive receptor sites can minimize truck exhaust impacts. Giroux and Associates estimates that with mitigation to keep equipment in good tune (low-NOX tune-ups), average daily construction equipment emissions can be slightly reduced, but not to less than significant levels during maximum grading activity days. III-33 September 20] 1 If~ilsort Avenue Extension (East) Drcf Environmental bnpactReport City of Rancho Cucamonga There is also the potential for local conshvction activity air quality impacts to "spill-over" into the surrounding community when construction vehicles carry diri or silt out into public sheets or i£ construction causes congestion effects due to road encroaclunent, detours or lane closures. However, these impacts can be mitigated to less-than-significant levels tlu-ough good housekeeping procedures and a construction traffic management plans. Table IILH-I: Total Daily Construction Emissions (Ib/day) • • SOURCE- CO. NOx PM-10: SOx ROG 1VOTE: 20 Scrapers 200 614 66 74 43 I 2 Dozers 6 20 2 2 2 2 Water Trucks 9 9 1 negligible 1 3 Worker Commuting 25 3 1 negligib]e 6 4 Fugitive Dust --- --- 52S --- --- 5 TOTALS 240 646 698 76 49 --- SCAQMDThreshold 550 100 150 150 75 --- PercentofThreshold 44% 646% 465% 51% 65% --- Notes: 1. SCAQMD Handbook, Table A9-8 (20 X 8 = 160 hours/day) 2. SCAQMD Handbook, Table A9-8 (2 X 8 = 16 hours/day) 3. URBEMIS7G Computer Output -Riverside Co. (2004) 500 mi/day heavy truck 4. URBEMIS7G Computer Output -Riverside Co. (2004) 2000 mi/day light duty auto/truck 5. 50 ac/day X 10.561b/ac = 5281b/day Construction activities may also generate evaporative emissions from volatile organic compounds (VOC) from use of paints, solvents, asphalt, roofing tar, and other coatings. The volatility of the materials used in asphalt, paints, and solvents are regulated by SCAQMD rules. Paint and other architectural coatings are the primary source ofconstruction-related VOC emissions. Even typical water-based paints contain around 2 pounds of VOC per gallon. If painting one home requires 20 gallons of paint, about 40 pounds of VOC will be released per house painted (inside and out). Thus, painting more than an average two homes per day would cause the SCAQMD threshold of 75 pounds per day of VOC to be exceeded. III-34 September 2011 l~rlson Avenue Exterasron (East) City of Rmrcho Cucamonga Draft Envirormaental Impact Repm-t • Long-Tenn (Operational) Impacts The project will contribute to the regional inability to attain the ozone standard based on SCAQMD's recommended significance levels. The mobile source emissions from project implementation may create a potentially significant air quality impact. Vehicle exhaust may impact air quality immediately adjacent to roadway travel lanes, particularly during periods of maximum traffic congestion and minimum atmospheric dispersion. So as to reduce the need to travel by automobile and thus reduce emissions, the City will include "Smart Communities" features in future proposed projects such as an attractive pedestrian environment to encourage walking and biking for short-destination trips and teleconnnunications facilities to promote teleconunuting. Additionally, the following measures shall be encouraged: a. Consideration of transit use incentives by employers to encourage public transit use by employees; b. Consideration of developing staggered work hours; and c. Consideration for providing convenient bus shelters and bus turnouts along the major arterials to encourage rider-ship and improve traffic flow. • There will also be secondary impacts derived from energy consumption in power plants or on-site heaters, stoves, water heaters, etc. Residential development also contributes miscellaneous emissions from a variety of sources such as cleaning products, landscaping equipment and fireplaces. Commercial uses, (restaurants, gas statimrs, dry cleaners, photo developing labs), also contribute to operational emissions. Stationary source (energy consumption) emissions can also contribute to operational air quality impacts. However, the total contribution from these sources is very small compared to the mobile source emissions resulting from vehicular use. These types of operational impacts are viewed as growth-related. However, these growth-related air quality impacts are not necessarily significant if they have been accounted for in the regional air quality planning process. Overall, however, the regional air quality impact is expected to be individually significant and not mitigatable to ales-than-significant level by reasonably available control measures. Mitigation Measures Due to the significance of air quality impacts created by this project, effective mitigation measures are important. However, since almost all of the significant project impacts derive from mobile source emissions beyond the conhol of the project sponsors, there is only limited potential for reducing any large percentage of project impacts. Effective reduction of mobile source emissions will require a unified transportation control measures (TSM) approach integrated into a comprehensive system of • procedures and goals. 1II-35 September 2011 u Wilson Avenue Exleaasion (East) Draft Fnviroavnental Gaapact Report City of Raaacho Caacanaoaaga Construction Entissiota The following mitigation-measures will be unposed to reduce construction-related emissions, particularly fugitive dust: AQ-1. Reduce inefficient circulation movements and thus reduce emissions by minimizing construction interference with regional non-project traffic movement tlu•ough measures such as: a. Scheduling receipt of construction materials during non-peak travel hours. b. Routing construction traffic through areas least sensitive to impacts. a Limiting lane closures and detours to off-peak travel periods. d. Providing ride-share incentives for contractor and subcontractor persomrel. • • AQ-2. Reduce "spill-over'' effects by preventing soil erosion, washing vehicles entering public roadways from off-road project areas, and washing/sweeping project access to public roadways on an adequate schedule. AQ-3. Limiting grading/soil disturbances to as small an area as practical at any one time. Trartsportatiort Related Emissions As discussed above, there are only a limited number of mitigation options available on aproject-specific basis. The project will incrementally reduce transportation related emissions by reducing vehicle miles traveled. Level of Impact with Mitigafion The above mitigation measures will lessen project-related impacts to air quality. However, some temporary construction-related impacts (such as fugitive dust emissions) and operational impacts (mobile source emissions) would exceed the applicable SCAQMD thresholds of significance. Overall, the project will result in significant adverse impacts to air quality. Approval of the project will require a Statement of Overriding Considerations for air quality unpacts. III-36 September 2011 Wilson fh~enzre Extension (East) City of Ra~~cho Cucamonga Draft Environmental h~zpact ReEort • H. AESTHETICS 1. LIGIIT AND GLARE Existing Conditions The project site is currently vacant and insignificant amounts of light and glare are emitted. General Plan Policies "Che City of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code requires the use of low-pressure sodium vapor streetlights. Threshold for Determining Significance The project will cause significant light and glare impacts if it would create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area. Environmental Impact Implementation of the proposed project will result in the construction of a roadway extension. For • safety and security reasons, outdoor lighting will be required for the project. Additional lighting may be needed for entry monumentation and signage. Within the proposed project, residential uses are the most sensitive to intrusive light. The required street lighting is not be anticipated to intrude into residences. With the implementation of City lighting standards and requirements, project lighting will not result in impacts to adjacent areas. Neither intrusive glare nor sun reflection are anticipated as a result of project development Mitigation No additional mitigation is required. Level of Impact With implementation of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Code pertaining to light and glare, the impacts of the project will be less than signficant • IlI-37 September 2011 Filson Avenue Exte»sion (East) Ciry of Rancho Cuean~onga Urcif! Em~ironnrental hnpact Reyort ,• I. CULTURAL RESOURCES Phase I cultural resources investigations of the project area were initiated by CRM Tech between May and July of 2007. CRM initiated a records search of published and unpublished archaeological and paleontological literature, pursued historical background research at the Archeological Information Center (AIC) at the San Bernardino County Museum, Redlands, consulted with the Native American Heritage Corrunission and local (Cowity-wide) Native American representatives and conducted an extensive field survey to determine the potential impacts to cultural resources (including historical) on the subject site. CRM completed the archaeological and paleontological work for this project and prepared a report summarizing the findings. So as to protect the resources, copies of portions of the archaeological and paleontological reports prepared by CRM are contained in Technical Appendix B to this EIR. No cultural or historic buildings, structures, objects, sites, features or artifacts more than fifty years of age were encountered during the field survey of the project site. Two historic-period sites and a portion of a third site were previously identified partially within or iu close proximity to the project site. No archeological features or artifacts associated with the tlu~ee previously identified sites were obseived within or adjacent to the project site, indicating that these sites have likely been removed since their recordation in the 1990's. • General Plan Policies The City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan establishes a broad goal which promotes protection, preservation, and restoration of significant cultural, historical, and architectural features. A resource is considered to be of significant cultural value if the site possesses one or more of the following characteristics: It exemplifies or reflects the broad cultural, political, economic or social history of the U.S., California or the City of Rancho Cucamonga It has yielded or has the potential to yield infornation important to history or prehistory It is a site or sh~ucture that is important to the prehistory or history of the community It is a hill or geologic formation, body of water, arroyo; remaining natural vegetation or other striking or familiar physical characteristic that is important to the special character, historic identity or aesthetic setting of the cormnwrity. Threshold for Determining Significance A significant impact related to cultural resources will occur if the piroposed project is determined to: •. a. Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in section 15064.5 of the CEQA Guidelines; III-38 September 2011 Wilson At~er~ue Extension (East) Draf! Environrnerrtcrl bnpact Report • City ojRancho Cucamor7ga b. Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to section 15064.5 of the CEQA Guidelines; c. Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or geologic site or unique geologic feature; or d. Disturb any ]roman remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries. A resource shall be generally considered by the lead agency to be "historically significant" if the resource meets the criteria for listing on the California Register of Historical Resources, including the following: a. Is associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of California's history and cultural heritage; b. Is associated with the lives ofpersons important in our past; c. Embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, region or method of construction, or represents the work of an impmrtant creative individual, or possesses high artistic values; or d. Has yielded, or may be likely to yield, information important in prehistory or history. • Project Environmental Impacts /Relationship to General Plan Policies Since it has been determined that no known historical resources exist within or adjacent to the project site, uo significant adverse enviromnenta] impacts to cultural resources will occur and no conflicts result with City General Plan Policies pertaining to cultural resources. Mitigatior Measures CR-1. Should bm'ied cultural materials be encountered during any earth-moving operations associated with the project, all work in that area shall be halted or diverted until a qualified archeologist can evaluate the natw•e and significance of the resources found. Level of SigniFicance with Mitigation The project will not result in significant adverse impacts to known cultural, archeological, historical, or paleontological resources. Mitigation Measure CR-1 will reduce potential impacts to unknown resources discovered during the construction phase of the project. i~ J III-39 September 2011 YVilson Avenue Exler7siaz (East) City ofRancho Cucamonga Draft Erzvironmenlal hnpact Report • IV. PUBLIC SERVICES AND FACILITIES A. TRANSPORTATIONANDCIRCULAT/ON Introduction A traffic analysis was prepared by Kunzman and Associates to provide an assessment of the haffic impacts resulting from the Wilson Avenue Extension (East), and to identify the traffic mitigation measures necessary to maintain the established level of service standard for the elements of the impacted roadway system. The technical report and analysis, included as Appendix D of this document, describes traffic impacts for existing and year 2030 traffic conditions. Project llescriptimr Wilson Avenue is identified as a Modified Major .Arterial with median and is an integral part of the City's General Plan. Wilson Avenue has a connection to the I-15 Freeway to the east. Wilson Avenue is cunrently discontinuous from Etiwanda Avenue to Wardman Bullock Road. The City is currently proposing to extend Wilson Avenue firom East Avenue easterly to intersect with Wardman Bullock Road. Additionally, approximately tlu'ee hundred feet (300') of East Avenue will be improved from the • intersection of East Avenue and Wilson Avenue southerly to the existing road improvements of East Avenue. A gap in Wilson Avenue will continue to exist from Etiwanda Avenue to East Avenue. A study area map showing the project location is provided on Figure I-2. Presently, eastbound traffic on Wilson Avenue at Etiwanda Avenue must detour to Banyan Street to reach destinations to the east. Vehicles also cunrently use Banyan Street to tt'avel westbound from the existing terminus of Wilson Avenue. Banyan Street is bordered by a City Park, elementary school, and a residential ]and uses. Completion of the ultimate improvements to Wilson Avenue Extension, including the segment between Etiwanda Avenue and East Avenue, will provide traffic relief to Banyan Street and lessens the potential for pedestrian-related accidents associated with activities occurring adjacent to schools, parks, and residential sheets. The traffic study includes information that the Federal Highway Administration and the California Department of Transportation requires for Federal funding tIu'ough the State Transportation Improvement Program. Wilson Avenue will eventually be a continuous route. Today, there is a gap or missing linilc in its mid-section. Wilson Avenue completes a local circulation link in the City's General Plan. Wilson Avenue is currently discontinuous between Etiwanda Avenue and Wardman Bullock Road. This is a gap of approximately 1.25 miles. Wilson Avenue is located parallel to and approximately 1 mile north of the I-210 Freeway. The proposed project will improve approximately one mile of the existing gap. Completion of ultimate improvements to Wilson Avenue between Etiwanda Avenue and Wardman Bullock Road will serve to shorten local trips that are cmrrently not provided with a continuous east-west • corridor. IV-1 September 2011 Ygilson Ave~aue Extension (East) City of Rancho Cucamonga Draft Environmental hwpact Report • Study Area Local access is provided by various roadways in the study area. The north-south roadways which will be most affected by the project include Day Creek Boulevard, Etiwanda Avenue, East Avenue, Wardman Bullock Road, and Cherry Avenue. The east-west roadways which will be most affected by the project are Wilson Avenue and Banyan Street. Analysis Methodology The analysis of the haffic impacts from the proposed development and the assessment of the required mitigation measures were based on an evaluation of the existing and forecast traffic conditions in the vicinity of the site with and without the project. The following analysis years are considered in this report: • Existing Conditions (2007) • Horizon year Conditions (2030) Existing intersection haffic conditions were established through moruing and evening pear hour traffic counts obtained by Kunzman Associates from December 2006 (See Appendix B of the technical report). In addition, truck classification counts were conducted at the study area intersections. The existing • percent of trucks were used in the conversion of trucks to Passenger Car Equivalent's. The average daily haffic volume forecasts have been determined using the growth increment approach on the East Valley Traffic Model traffic model Year 2000 and Year 2030 average daily traffic volume forecasts (see Appendix C of the technical report). This difference defines the growth in traffic over the 30-year period. The incremental growth in average daily traffic volume has been factored to reflect the forecast growth between the Year 2007 and Year 2030. For this purpose, linear growth between the Year 2000 base condition and the forecast year 2030 condition was assumed. Since the increment between Year 2007 and Year 2030 is 23 years of the 30-year time frame, a factor of 0.77 (i.e., 23/30) was used. The Year 2030 daily and peak hour directional roadway segment volume forecasts have been determined using the growth increment approach on the East Valley Traffic Model Year 2000 and Year 2030 peak hour volwnes. The growth increment calculation worksheets are shown in Appendix C. Current peak hour intersection approach/departure data is a necessary input to this approach. The existing traffic count data serves as both the starting point for the refnemeut process, and also provides important insight into current travel patterns and the relationship between peak hour and daily traffic conditions. The initial turning moveme~it piroportions are estimated based upon the relationship of each approach leg's forecast traffic volume to the other legs forecast volumes at the intersection. The initial estimate if turning movement proportions in then entered into a spreadsheet program consistent with the National Cooperative Highway Research Program Report 255. A linear programming algoritlmn is used to calculate individual turning movements that match the lalown directional roadway segment volumes • computed in the previous step. This program computes a likely set of intersection turning movements ' from intersection approach counts and the initial fuming proportions from each approach leg. IV-2 September 2011 Wilson Avencre Extension (East) City of Rancho Cucamonga Draft Environmental bnpact Report • Quality control checks and forecast adjustments were performed as necessary to ensure that all future traffic volume forecasts reflect a minimwn of 10% growth over existing traffic volumes. The result of this traffic forecasting procedure is a series of traffic volumes suitable for traffic operations analysis. The technique used to assess the capacity needs of an intersection is known as the hrtersection Delay Method (see Appendix D) based on the 2000 Hiehways Capacity Manual -Transportation Research Board Special Report 209. To calculate delay, the volume of traffic using the intersection is compared with the capacity of the intersection. Signalized intersections are considered deficient (Level of Service F) is the overall intersection critical volume to capacity ratio equals or exceeds 1.0, even if the level of service defined by the delay value is below the defined level of Service standard. The volume to capacity ratio is defined as the critical volumes divided by the intersection capacity. A volume capacity ratio greater that 1.0 implies an infinite queue. The Level of Service analysis for signalized intersection had been performed using optimized signal timing. This analysis has included an assumed lost time of two seconds per phase. Signal timing optimization has considered pedestrian safety and signal coordination requirements. Appropriate time for pedestrians crossing have also been considered in the signalized intersection analysis. The following formula has been used to calculate the pedestrian minimum times for all Highway Capacity manual runs: [(Curb to curb distance) / (4 feet/second)] + 7 seconds • For existing traffic conditions, saturation flow rates of 1,800 vehicles per hour of green for t9rrough and right turn lanes and 1,700 vehicles per lane for single left turn lanes, 1,600 vehicles per lane for dual left turn lanes and 1,500 vehicles per lane for triple left turn lanes have been assumes for the capacity analysis. For year 2030 traffic conditions, saturation flow rates of 1,900 vehicles per how' of green for through and right turn lanes and 1,800 vehicles per lane for single left turn lanes, 1,700 vehicles per lane for dual left turn lanes and 1,800 vehicles per lane for double right turn lanes have been assumed for the capacity analysis. The peak hour traffic volumes have been adjusted to peak 15 minutes volumes for analysis purposes using the existing observed peak 15 minute to peak hour factors for all scenarios analyzed. Where feasible improvements in accordance with the local jurisdiction's General Plan and which result in the acceptable operations cannot be identified, the year 2030 peak hour factor has been adjusted upwards to 0.95. This is to account for the tendency of h'affic to spread more evenly across time ad congestion increases. The Traffic mitigation needs anticipated for the Year 2030 were combined into a sununary of mitigation requirements. Definition of Deficiency The following definition of deficiency has been developed in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga requirements. The definition of an intersection deficiency has been obtained from the City •~ of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan. The General Plan states that peak hour intersection operations of IV-3 September 2011 Wilson Avenue Extension (East) City nfRanc/ao Cucamonga Draft Environmental Lnynct Report • Level of Service D or better are generally acceptable. Therefore, any intersection operating at Level of Service E to F will be considered deficient. Existing Conditions Existing Roadway System Existing conditions for study area roadways and the number of through lanes for existing roadways and the existing intersection conhols are identified in the technical traffic analysis. Local access is provided by various roadways in the study area. The north-south roadways which will be most effected by the project include Day Creek Boulevard, Etiwanda Avenue, East Avenue, Wardntan Bullock Road, and Cherry Avenue. The east-west roadways which will be most affected by the project are Wilson Avenue and Banyan Street. Existing Volumes The existing average daily traffic volumes were factored from peak hour counts (see Appendix B of the technical report) obtained by Kunzman Associates using the following formula for each intersection leg: PM Peak Hour (Approach + Exit Volume) x 11.5 =Daily Leg Volume. This is a conservative estimate and may over estimate the average daily traffic volumes. Existing intersection traffic conditions were established tln-ough morning and evening peak hour ttaff c counts obtained by Kunzman Associates from December 2006 (see Appendix B of the technical report). Explicit peak hour factors have been calculated using the data collected for this effort as well. The morning and evening peak hour traffic volumes were identified by counting the two-hour periods from 7:00 AM - 9:00 AM and 4:00 PM - 6:00 PM. Existing Level of Service The existing delay and Level of Service for urtersections in the vicinity of the project are shown in Table L The study area intersection currently operate at level of Service D or better during the peak hours for existing traffic conditions, except for the following study area intersection that currently operated at a Level of Service E during the event peak hour: Wardman Bullock Road (NS) at: Wilson Avenue (EW) Existing delay worksheets are provided in Appendix D of the technical report. Existing Traffic Signal Warrant • A traffic signal appears to cunrently be warranted at the following study area intersection for existing traffic conditions (see Appendix D) IV-4 September 2011 • Wilson Avw~ue Extension (East) Draft Environmental bnpact Report Crty of Rancho Cuca~no~~ga Wardman Bullock Road (NS) at: Wilson Avenue (EW) • \J The unsignalized intersections have been evaluated for traffic signals using the California Department of Transportation Warrant 3 peak Hour h-affe signal warrant analysis, as specified in the Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devises 2003 California Supplement, dated May 20, 2004. Planned Transportation Improvements and Relationship to General Plan The City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Circulation Element is shown on Figure IV-1. The City of Rancho Cucamonga typical roadway cross-sections are shown on Figure IV-2. IV-5 September 2011 i• Wilson Avenue Extension (East) Draft E~wiron~nental Lnpact Report City of Rancho Cucai~~onga Figure IV-1 General Plan Circulation Element ~ i ~ r ~ _ ----- •l. ~ ~ ~~ i - =~, sr _~, ,~ I~ ~~ u~. r- i • • ~_ . ~:, ~ ~ ~~~ ^ ~ ~ 1 ~~~ ~, ~_ ,~~- III ~ i «: IF 1~ i ~ _~.._ . _ _ F~QTI~ILL ASR ~~ ~ ',, ~~ `l FREEVI+~A~` /___=/J Coflectcr ;,~~~~ Modified Collector with Median Secondary ~l'~~.~ Modified Secondary with Median ~' Major Arterial Wilson Avenue / ~ /~ Modified Major with Median / ~/ E Major Divided Arterial / ~ Major Divided Highway _•__ ! Intersections to be widened beyond typical General Plan standards _ _ ~ Free~nrays ..~ .~ Freeway Interchange IV-6 March 2010 i Wilson Avenue Extension (East) Draft Envirorarnentallmpact Report City of Rancho Cucamonga Figure IV-2 Typical roadway cross-sections 100• .__ _.____.. ___ 72' __. 14' 14' 5' 14'1731 12'(12') 10'(12') 12'(12') 14'(13' S' Bike + i `S 1 f MAJOR ARTERIAL MId•Block _-__- _._-.______--_ 103' - -. w/ 12' 39' 84' 47' ~ .~, ~ 5' 12' 11' 70' 10' _ 11' 11' 14' r Bike + ) } ,~ ~ ) rr 16' Residential MAJOR ARTERIAL (Dual Lek Turn Lanes and Right Turn) (14') Commercial I Industrial • Varies Varies ~ J2' - 76' ~ 32' Varies 5' _-~- 14' 13' 14' 13' 14' S' Bike Bike MODIFIED MAJOR WITN MEDIAN ISLAND •SEE SPECIFIC PLAN / Wilson Avenue 'I - :: ----- 1zo' 94' w,. ~ 5' _ 77' _ 11' 13' r1 13' _ 77' Bike ~ y + } } MAJOR DIVIDED ARTERIAL (Mid•Block) i 51' 5' 11' _ 11' 11' 13' 1~7 13' 17' 11' 11' _ 5' ~ Bike 1 ~ + MAJOR DIVIDED HIGHWAY (Mid-Block) } 1 Bike 148' ~'Ij-4, 134. _---._ 11' _-'-7~~ 51' 1'I' _ 13' 11 ta'I'_ 11' 11'_- ~9. ~~. ~~. ~w. r- Bike + ~ { + } MAJOR DIVIDED NIGHWAY (Dual LeR Turn Lanes and Right Turn Lane) 1~ u IV-7 March 2010 MAJOR DIVIDED ARTERIAL (Dual LeR Turn Lanes and Right Turn Lane) YI'ilson Aveirue Extension (Ensl) City of Rcn~clao Cucamonga Draft Enviro~~nsenlal h~~pnct Report Ycar 2030 Conditions Year 2030 Volumes As described above; the Year 2030 average daily traffic volume forecasts are developed using a growth increment process based on volumes predicted by the East Valley Traffic Model Year 2000 and Year 2030 traffic models. The growth increment for year 2030 on each roadway segment is the increase in East Valley Traffic Model volumes from existing year 2007 to Year 2030. The final Year 2030 roadway segment volume used for analysis purposes is then determined by adding the Year 2030 growth increment volume to the existing counted volume. The average daily traffic volumes for Year 2030 traffc conditions have been determined above using Ylne growth increment process (see Section LC.). Year 2030 Traffic Signal Warrant Analysis Traffic signals are not projected to be warranted at the following additional study area intersections for Year 2030 traffic conditions (see Appendix E of the technical report): Etiwanda Avenue-North Leg (NS) at: Wilson Avenue (EW) • Etiwanda Avenue-South Leg (NS) at: Wilson Avenue (EW) East Avenue (NS) at: Wilson Avenue (EW) Conclusion and Recommendations/Summary The average daily traffic volume forecasts have been determined using the growth increment approach on the East Valley Traffic Model Year 2000 and Year 2030 average daily traffic volume forecasts (see Appendix C of the technical report). This difference defines the growth in traffic over the 30-year period. The incremental growth in average daily traffic volume has been factored to reflect the forecast growth between Year 2007 and Year 2030. The year 2030 daily and peak hour directional roadway segment volume forecasts have been determined using the growth increment approach ou the East Valley Traffic Model Year 2000 and Year 2030 peak hour volumes. The growth increment calculation worksheets are shown in Appendix C. Cun'ent peak hour intersection approacl>/departure data is a necessary input to this approach. The existing traffic count data serves as both the starting point for the refinement process, and also provides important insight into cun'ent travel patterns and the relationship between peak hour and daily traffic conditions. The initial turning movement proportions are estimated based upon the relationship of each approach leg's forecast traffic volwne to the other legs forecast volumes at the intersection. The initial estimate of turning movement proportions is the entered into a spreadsheet program consistent with the National • Cooperative Highway Research Program Report 255. A linear prograrruning algorithm is used to calculate individual honing movements that match the known directional roadway segment volumes IV-S September 20] 1 l~ilsan Avenue Esteaasioaz (East) Drnft Environaaaentnl hnpact Report J City of Rancho Cucamonga computed in the previous step. This program computed a likely set of intersection turning movements from intersection approach counts and the initial turning proportions from each approach leg. Quality control checks are forecast adjustments were performed as necessary to ensure that all future traffic volume forecasts reflect a minimum of 10% growth over existing traffic vohunes. The result of this traffic forecasting procedure is a series of traffic volumes suitable for traffic operations analysis. Future Conditions For Year 2030 traffic conditions, the study area intersections are projected to operate at Level of Service D or better during the peak howl, with improvements. Traff c signals are not projected to be warranted at the following additional study area intersections for Year 2030 traffic conditions (see Appendix E): &iwanda Avenue-North Leg (NS) at: Wilson Avenue (EW) Etiwanda Avenue-South Leg (NS) at: Wilson Avenue (EW) East Avenue (NS) at: Wilson Avenue (EW) • Conclusions The traffic study includes information that the Federal Highway Administration and the California Department of Transportation requires for Federal funding tluough the State Transportation Improvement Program. Wilson Avenue will eventually be a continuous route. Today, there is a gap or missing link in its mid-section. The proposed project will contribute to Wilson Avenue completing a local circulation link in the City's General Plan. Mitigation Measures TR-1 Sight distance at each study area intersection should be reviewed with respect to California Department of Transportatioa>/City of Rancho Cucamonga standards in conjunction with the preparation of final grading, landscaping, and sheet improvement plans. TR-2 Traffic signing and sniping should be implemented in conjunction with detailed construction plans for the project. TR-3 As is the case for any roadway design, the City of Rancho Cucamonga should periodically review traffic operations in the vicinity of the project once the project is constructed to assure that the traffic operations are satisfactory. Any roadway improvements constructed consistent with the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan and Circulation Element are not considered a significant impact, provided the project contributes its • "fair share" fw~ding of the required improvement. IV-9 September 2011 Wilsar Ave~zue Extension (East) City of Rancho C'ucanzonga DraftEm~ironme»!al G~tpact Report • Level of Impact After Mitigation The deficiencies listed above will be corrected to at least LOS "D" with the installation of the combined improvements already listed above for Opening Year With Project. hi addition, all General Plan roadways will be improved to their full width improvement sections. A gap will remain in Wilson Avenue (Etiwanda Avenue to EasbAvenue) with the completion of the proposed project. The net impact on traffic and circulation will be less than significant. The future construction of Wilson Avenue from Etiwanda Avenue to East Avenue will result in a positive impact on the circulation system in the conunmiity. B. PUBLIC SERVICES 1. SCHOOLS Cxisting Conditions The proposed project lies within the service boundaries of the Etiwanda School District and the Chaffey • Joint Union High School District. General Plan Policies The Rancho Cucamonga General Plan's goals with regard to school facilities are to enable cooperative school and public facility plaiming in considering timing; siting, funding, joint recreational and social use programs and creation of an overall sense of community. Threshold for lletermining Significance Impacts on educational facilities may be considered significant if the project will result in an increased emrolhnent beyond the capacities of the schools serving the project area. Project Environmental Impacts /Relationship to General Plan Policies The project will not generate any students nor require use of school facilities, therefore will not have any environmental impacts to school facilities nor be in conflict with City General Plan Policies pertaining to schools. Project Impacts Project impacts to schools will be below the level of significance. • IV-10 September 2011 WilsonAnenue Exte~~sio~i (Eas!) Ciry ofRai~dto Czrcamw~ga Draft E~svh-atine~atal hnpact Report • Mitigation No mitigation is required to reduce the project impacts to schools to below the level of significance. Level of Impact The project's impacts to schools will be below the level of significance 2. LIBRARIES Existing Conditimts The City of Rancho Cucamonga coordinates and administers library services tlu-oughout the City. General Plan Policies • The General Plan objective for libraries is to provide libt~ry facilities and services consistent with convnunity needs. Threshold for Determining Significance Impacts on library services may be considered significant if the project results iii a decline in service capabilities below existing levels. Project Environmental Impacts /Relationship to General Plan Policies The proposed project will not result in any adverse or significant impact on library services and will not be in conflict with City General Plan Policies pertaining to libraries. Project Impacts ~.J Project impacts to library services will be below the level of significance. Mitigation No mitigation is required to reduce the project impacts to libraries to below the level of significance. Level of Impact The project's impacts to libraries will be below the level of significance. IV-11 September 2011 ll~ilson Ai~enue Extension (East) Draft Environmental Impact Report • 3. LAW ENFORCEMENT SERVICES Existin ;Conditions Ciiy of Rancho Cuccmaonga T aw enforcement service for the area is provided by County of San Bernardino Sheriff's Department. General Plan Policies The objective for law enforcement services in the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan is to provide police services, which minimize the risk of crime and provide a secure environment. Threshold for Determining Significance Impacts on law enforcement services may be considered significant if the proposed project will result in 1) an increased demand for services beyond the capabilities of the County of San Bernardino Sheriffs Departrnent, or 2) exposure of persons to crime or other harm against which the Sheriff's Department is unable to provide protection. Project Environmental Impacts /Relationship to General Plan Policies • The proposed project will require expansion of services, which are not currently being provided to the project site. Mitigation Measures No mitigation is required. Level of Impact Impacts to law enforcement services will be below the level of significance. 4. FIl2E PROTECTION SERVICES Existing Conditions Fire protection services to the projecC site are the responsibility of the City Fire District. General Plan Policies The goal of fire protection services, according to the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan, is to • provide "adequate fire prevention and emergency fire, medical, and hazardous materials services for the protection of lives and property." The City Fire Department has established a performance standard IV-12 September 2011 6Vilsorz Avenue Extezzsiozz (East) Ciry of Rancho Czreanzonga Draft Ezzvh'onznental hzzpact Report • wherein eighty percent of the response calls occur witlvn Five dri~nrtes of the request for assistance. Additional facilities and manpower are deemed necessary when this response performance standard cannot be met. Tlu•cshold for Determining Significance hnpacts on fire protection may be considered significant if the proposed project will exceed current or proposed future levels of protection. Project Environmental Impacts Implementation of the proposed project, incorporating standard mitigation measures as identified below, will not result in any adverse or significant impact on fire protection and emergency services and will not be in conflict with City General Plan Policies pertaining to fire protection and emergency services. The project, by making improvements to East Avenue north to Wilson Avenue and improvements to Wilson Avenue eastward to Wardnran $ullock Road, will improve the ability of fire protection services to respond timely by establishing a direct link to Wilson Avenue and providing access to the east from the existing fire station on East Avenue. Mitigation Measures • FPS-1 All project street widths, grades and turning/curve radii will be designed to allow access by fire suppression vehicles and will be subject to the approval of the City of Hemet Fire Department FPS-2 Fire hydrant locations will be in compliance with City Fire Department standards and requirements. FPS-3 Fire flow requirements, including flow, quantities, pressure and duration consistent with City Fire Department standards and specifications, will be incorporated into overall project design. FPS-4 All water mains and fire hydrants providing required fire flows will be constructed in accordance with the City Fire Department. Level of Impact After Mitigation Incorporation and implementation of the above mitigation measures will reduce project impacts to fire protection services to below the level of sigruficaiice. IV-13 September 2011 • Nilson Avenue Extension (East) Drnf! Environrnetttal bnpact Report 5. PARKS AND RECREATION Existing Conditions City of Rancho Cucamonga The project site is located north and within a mile of existing City parks and recreation facilities. General Plan Policies The General Plan objectives for parks and recreation call for a balanced system of recreational, cultural, educational, and aesthetic opportunities for residents and visitors. This system should incorporate existing outstanding park resources such as scenic views or archaeological features. Related land use programs/standards recommend the following: Consider combining neighborhood parks with elementary school sites. Design park facilities to be accessible to the disabled. • • Threshold for Determining Signiticance Impacts on recreation facilities are considered significant if the project creates a demand for recreation services, which exceeds the design or use standards of existing or plamled facilities. Project Environmental Impacts/Relationship to General Plan Policies The proposed project will not result in any adverse or significant impact on recreation services and will not be in conflict with City General Plan Policies pertaining to parks and recreation facilities. Mitigation Measures No mitigation measures are required. Level of Impact Project impacts on park and recreation facilities will be reduced to less than significant levels. 6. Solid Waste General Plan Policies The City's objective with regard to solid waste is to provide adequate landfill sites that are able to accommodate existing and future solid waste generation. The land use standards for solid waste require that sufficient landfill capacity and life expectancy be able to satisfy flee needs of new developments. IV-14 September 2011 Wilson Avenue Extension (East) City of Rancho Cucamonga Draft Envirozmental Irnpcrct Report • The City also encourages the use of waste management strategies to facilitate resource recovery iu all ^ew developinent proposals. Thresholds for Determining Significance • Impacts to solid waste are significant if waste volume generated would exceed existing or anticipated disposal capabilities. Impacts may also be considered significant if the project would form a disproportionately large portion of the waste stream at a given disposal site or if the project would greatly hasten the need for additional disposal facilities. Project Environmental Impacts/Relationship to General Plan Policies The proposed projecC will not result iu any adverse or significant impact on solid waste services and will not be in conflict with City General Plan Policies pertaining to solid waste. Mitigation Measures No mitigation measures are required to reduce impacts on solid waste disposal facilities: Level of Impact Project impacts to solid waste disposal services and facilities will be less than significant. 7. HEALTH SERVICES Existing Conditions A major concern of residents in new and developing areas is the availability of medical services and facilities. Medical services and facilities should be upgraded or developed to maintain levels of service consistent with the needs of the developing area. General Plan Policies The objective regarding health care as stated hi the General Plan is to assure adequate health facilities and services consistent with community needs. The program associated with the objective species that the City will coordinate with health facilities and help develop standards that can be used to determine the adequacy of health services. Threshold for Determining Significance Impacts on health services and facilities are considered significant if the project creates a demand for such services and facilities that exceeds the design or use standards of existing or planned facilities. IV-15 September 2011 14~ilson Ave~azre Extensiore (East) City of Rcu~cho Cucamonga Draft Enviromne»!al hnpact Report u Project Environmental Impacts /Relationship to General Plan Policies The proposed project will not result in any adverse or significant impact on health services and will not be in conflict with City General Plan Policies pertaining to health services. Mitigation Measures No mitigation measures are required. Level of Impact The project's impact on health services will be below the level of sig~uficance C. UTILITIES 1. Water and Sewer Existing Conditions Water SuPP~Y Under Public Resources Code section 21151.9 and California Water Code section 10910-10915, enviromnental impact reports for certain development projects must address the availability of water for the project. The following section discusses the project's effects on existing water supplies and delivery infrastructure pursuant to the standards set forth nr these code sections. The project is located within the service area of Cucamonga Valley Water District. General Plan Policies The City, in conjunction with Cucamonga Valley Water District; will maintain along-range water and sewer plan that specifies facilities adequacy criteria and water conservation and reuse programs. Threshold for Determining Significance The project would require water service for construction, potable use, in-igation, and fire protection associated with residential, conmiercial, liglrt industrial, institutional and recreational uses. According to the CEQA Guidelines Appendix G, a project's impacts are considered to have a significatrt effect on the enviromnent if the project would: • . substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with growrdwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local growrdwater IV-l6 September 2011 Wilson Avenue Extension (East) City of Rancho Cucarrronga Draft Eravironnrentnl hnpaet Report • table level (e.g., the production rate of preexisting nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted); • result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered govenmlental facilities the construction of which could cause significant enviromnental impacts in order to maintain acceptable service ratios; • require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities the construction of which could cause significant envirozmlental effects; • have insufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources or require new or expanded entitlements. This analysis also evaluates the potential water quality impacts associated with the use of recycled wastewater on the site. According to the CEQA Guidelines, Appendix G, a project would normally be considered to have a significant effect on the enviromnent if it would substantially degrade water quality and/or groundwater resources or violate any water quality standards. Impacts on sewer utilities are considered significant if the project will result in demand, which exceeds the existing or plated service capabilities of water district for this given area. • Project Environmental Impacts /Relationship to General Plan Policies Water Consun:ptioa and Wastewater Generation The project will not generate any wastewater. The incremental increase in water consumption will result fiom the landscaping improvements. Water Supply •~ With these water service plans and implementation programs in place, no significant cumulative impacts would result to water supply or water quality. Sewage T~•enbnent The proposed project will not result in any adverse or sigzficant impact on sewage h-eahnent facilities and will not be in conflict with City General Plan Policies pertaining to sewage h'eabnent. Impacts Compliance with existing standards and regulations as well as the implementation of plarmed service systems will reduce project impacts to regional water supplies and sewage treatment services to below the level of significance. N-17 September 2011 I~T~ilso~z Avenue Extension (East) Ciry of Rm~cho Cucamo~sga Draft Environnte~ilal Impact Repw7 • Mitigation Other than the implementation of cunrently plamied improvement projects and the project's participation in said improvement projects, no mitigation is necessary. Level of Impact The project's impact on water and sewer will be below the level of significance 2. Electricity Existing Conditions Current electrical demand is nonexistent Southern California Edison Company (SCE) currently provides elech'icity in the vicinity of the project site through local facilities in the project area. Threshold for Determining Significance Impacts on electricity are considered significant if there is a substantial increase in demand relative to available supplies of electricity. Project Environmental Impacts /Relationship to General Plan Policies CJ With the increase in urban development proposed by the project, electrical consumption will increase. Southern California Edison does not anticipate any problem providing au adequate level of service to the project area, although existing lines may have to be upgraded and extended to serve the proposed project. SCE does not currently have any plans for expansion of existing facilities in the area. In order to serve the proposed project, new underground facilities will have to be installed by the project applicant per SCE's directives and rules on file with the California Public Utilities Connnission. SCE will upgrade their existing facilities to meet the needs of the proposed project. The proposed project will not result in any adverse or significant impact on provision of electricity and will not be in conflict with City General Plan Policies pertaining to electricity facilities. Mitigation Other than the implementation of currently plaimed improvement projects and the project's participation in said improvement projects, no mitigation is necessary. Level of Impact The project's impact on electric services will be below the level of significance IV-18 September 2011 l4~ilron Avenue E.rteaasiaa (East) City of Rancho Cucaauongn Draft Environmental Impact Report • 3. Natural Gas Cxisting Conditions Existing natural gas consumption is nonexistent. The Southern California Gas Company (SCG) currently provides natural gas in the vicinity of the project site. Existing transmission lines in the area could provide gas service to the project site. Threshold for Determining Significance Impacts on gas service are considered significant if there is a substantial increase in demand relative to available supplies of natural gas. Project Environmental Impacts /Relationship to General Plan Policies The proposed project will not result in any adverse or significant impact on natural gas services and will not be in conflict with City General Plan Policies pertaining to natural gas. Impacts Based on the above analysis, project impacts on gas consumption and provision of gas service are • considered less than significant. Mitigation Measures No mitigation measures are required. Level of Impact The project's impact on natural gas services will be below the level of significance 4. Telephone Threshold for Determining Significance Impacts on telephone services are considered significant if the project will place demands on facilities and services beyond the ability of service providers to meet the demands. Project Environmental Impacts /Relationship to General Plan Policies The proposed project will not result in any adverse or significant impact on telephone/commw~ication services and will not be in conflict with City General Plus Policies pertaining to telephones and • conmmnication. IV-19 September ?011 6Vilson Avena~e Extension (East) Ciry of Rancho Ca~camonga Draft Eizviro~amental Impact Report ,• 6npacts Impacts will be less than significant. Mitigation No mitigation is required. Level of Impact The project's impact on natural gas services will be below the level of significance ~. Television Threshold for Determining Significance Impacts on cable television services are considered significant if there is a substantial increase in demand relative to available supplies of services. Project IJnvironmental Lnpacts /Relationship to General Plan Policics • The proposed project will not result in any adverse or significant impact on television services and facilities and will not be in conflict with City General Plan Policies pei•Caining to television services and facilities. Mitigation Measures • No mitigation measures are required. Level of Impact The project's impact on television services and facilities will be below the level of signficance IV-20 September 201 I I~Vilsoa~ Avernre Extension (East) City of Rancho Cucamonga Draft Firral F_nvironnreralal Impact Report • V. MANllATORY CEQA TOPICS A. CUMULATIVE INIPACTANALYSIS CEQA requires that an EIR examine cumulative impacts associated with a project. The range of projects to be included in the cumulative analysis encompasses "past, present, and reasonably anticipated future projects producing re]ated or cumulative impacts, including those outside of the control of the agency." Section 15130 requires cumulative impacts to be discussed "where they are significant." A cumulative effect is deemed significant if the project's incremental contribution to a cumu]ative impact is "considerable." A cumulative impact is not considered significant if the impact can be mitigated to below the level of significance through mitigation, including providing improvements and/or contributing funds through fee-payment programs. The EIR must examine "reasonable options for mitigating or avoiding arty significant cumulative effects of a proposed project" (CEQA, Section 15130). The following examines impacts associated with the extension of Wilson Avenue with past, present, and future projects in the vicinity. Scope of Analysis The scope of this cumulative analysis includes the existing, plamied and reasonably foreseeable future projects within the study area. This cumulative analysis is based upon a future laud use scenario that • incorporates the assumption that projects recently approved or currently in process within the study area will be built out as currently plamred. Existing and Approved Projects It is assumed, for the purposes of this analysis, that all approved projects will be built as pla~med and entitled. Regional Planning Regional impacts will be addressed tln-ough City participation in Southern California Association of Govermneuts (SCAG) forecasting and plarming programs and City adoption of SCAG policies. Some of the plam~ing issues which cross-jurisdictional boundaries include air and water pollution, and the expansion of transportation and sewer treatment facilities. One of the functions of SCAG has been development of regional growth forecasts and policies to aid in planning for future growth. Regional plans are also developed for specific developmental or envirormrental issues, including air quality, water quality, open space, transportation, housing, solid waste disposal, acid greenhouse gas emissions. SCAG periodically develops and publishes official population, housing, employment and land use forecasts (PHEL) based on input from Counties and Cities. From the PHEL growth figures, SCAG develops growth management policies and mechanisms with which to measure growth and the effects of commuter traffic on regional infi-ast•ucture and the environment. The City periodically adopts these . SCAG policy forecasts to remain consistent with regional plarming efforts. It is assumed for the purposes of this analysis that SLAG revised policies will continue to be adopted by the City as necessary for long-range plamiing purposes. V-I September 2011 1Vilson Avenue Extensior2 (East) City ofRarrcho C'rrcamonga Draft Fn~al Em~ironmental Impact Report ,• 1. Land Use The project is consistent with the City General Plan, including Circulation and Laud Use I/lements. Mitigation Measures CUMU-1. Consistent with current practices, the City will review each nidividual development proposal to ensure that every development project incorporates features, which minimize potential land use conflicts between proposed and existing uses. Conditions of approval will be prepared and enforced to achieve this objective. Level of Impact After Mitigation .This project. will not result in significant cmnulative adverse impacts to land use. 2. Seismic Safety, Geology and 1/rosion a. Seisn:ie Snfery • Seismic hazards of concern are limited to ground shaking associated with an earthquake along any of the regional faults. Standard seismic engineering practices can be employed to minimize structural damage in the event of an earthquake. Projects within the study area will be required to comply with all applicable State and local building codes. Level of Impact No cumulative, sibonificant adverse impacts associated with ground shaking will result from this project. Mitigation No mitigation is required b. Geology Geologic hazards of concern include soil suitability. The Building and Safety Department requires preparation of soils reports for every development project within the study area which involves "engineered grading." Such reports must identify any soils and slope instability problems associated with a development site, and must provide appropriate engineering solutions to address the problems. All reports must be reviewed and approved by the City prior to the issuance of_grading and building permits. Continued application of these existing requirements will minimize risks associated with geologic hazards. Implementation and enforcement of City policies and regulations will ensure geological hazards are minimized. Individual project and cumulative impacts will be less than •, significant. V-2 September 2011 Wilson fh~enne Extension (East) City of Rancho Cucamonga Draft Final Environmental bnpact Report Grading in the study area is not expected to significantly alter existing landforn. Grading will be used to create suitable building pad sites and to assure adequate drainage. City hillside grading regulations • will be applied to all development in hillside areas, especially in those areas of greater than 25% slope, so as to minimize the amount of cut and fill required and to ensure that the natural landform is preserved to the greatest extent possible. Level of Impact Cumulative impacts to geology, landform and soils will be less than significant. Mitigation No mitigation is required c. Erosion Development in the region will decrease the amount of open space and undeveloped areas currently subject to wind and water erosion. Further, development will bring much of the currently unregulated areas wider control by of the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES), as well as other City, State and federal regulations governing pollution as a result of water erosion, wind erosion, construction activities and water quality issues. • The City will implement and/or comply with the regulations and development standards noted below to reduce impacts to a less than significant level • Consistent with cun-ent practices, the Plamiing Department will review and approve soils reports (and, where required, geotechnical reports) for all development projects. • All development will comply with State and City building codes, nicluding those requiring appropriate seismic safety engineering. Mitigatio^ Subject to the implementation of the regulations discussed above, no mitigation is required. Level of Impact Cumulative impacts due to erosion will be improved and are considered less than significant. 3. Flooding, Drainage and Dam Inundation Development will be required to participation in the funding of the regional flood control facilities • identified in applicable master drainage plans. These facilities must meet County Flood Control and V-3 September 2011 Wilson Averrare Exterrsron (East) City of Rancho Cucamonga Draft Final Eranirormaental Impact Report • FEMA requirements. City Public Works Department will continue to review all development proposals to determine the level of improvements and mitigation required for each individual project. a. Flooding Portions of the project site are within a 100-year flood plain. The recently constructed Etiwanda Debris Basin will minimize flood hazards in the region. However, urbarzation within the cumulative project area will increase the amount of impervious surfaces throughout the area, thereby potentially increasing runoff into regional flood conh~ol charnrels. These potential adverse effects will be minimized through construction of flood control- facilities and implementation of design standards required by the City of Rancho Cucamonga on an individual project basis. Level of Impact Cumulative effects to flooding will be less than significant. In fact, the level of flood control and protection will be improved by the implementation of the master drainage plan for the area, Mitigation No mitigation is required • b. Dr•airrnge The City of Rancho Cucamonga bas established a series of master drainage plans, which recognize the potential impacts on existing facilities. The plans illustrate and describe the new facilities required to mitigate adverse effects. hnplementation of existing and future master drainage plans will reduce impacts to drainage to less-than-significant levels. In those areas where no master drainage plan currently exists, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will evaluate development proposals on a case-by-case basis, consistent with its current practices. Level of Impact Continuation of current review procedures will result in less-than-significant impacts. Overall, cumulative effects to drainage will be less than significant. Mitigation No mitigation is required 4. Noise • The prroposed project, combined with anticipated urbanization of the region is expected to greatly increase vehicular traffic in the area. In particular, noise levels along Wilson Avenue will be elevated. V-4 September 201 I Wilson Avenue Extension (East) City of Rancho Cucamonga Draft Final Erzviror~mental h~rpact Report Impacts • This effect is significant but will be reduced through mitigation and implementation of the measures noted below on an individual project basis. Mitigation Measures CUMU-2 Establish time limit on hours of construction, per City Code. CUMU-3 Require all construction-related equipment, either fixed or mobile to be equipped with properly operating and maintained muffler exhaust systems. CUMU-4 Require stationary equipment to be situated in a manner that will direct emitted noise away from noise sensitive receptors. CUMU-5 Arrange construction operations, which produce the highest leve]s of noise to occur together in the construction program in order to avoid continuing periods of greater annoyance. CUMU-6 Incorporation of buffer distances and noise propagation ban~iers in areas where construction noise levels may exceed noise thresholds. Level of Impact After Mitigation With adoption of the above mitigation measures, this project will not result in significant cumulative adverse impacts to noise levels. 5. Air Quality The proposed project and other plamred and anticipated development within the cumulative project area will contribute to the pollutant load in the Southent Califorrria air basin. Pollutant emissions will result fi•om construction activity and, in the long term, from vehicle use and the burning of fuels for heating, cooking, lighting, etc. Construction Activity Construction activity will generate particulate dust and emissions from heavy construction equipment. The level of emissions which maybe generated are not quantified here due to the uncertainties regarding acreage that may be graded and the types of construction equipment which will be used. Some level of constwction activity is expected to be ongoing within the cumulative project area over the next 20 to 30 years and beyond. Due to the existing problem of high PM~o and PM2.5 concentrations within the sub region, grading and •' construction activity can be expected to produce impacts on sub regional air quality. V-5 September 2011 Wilson Avenue Extension (East) City of Rancho Cucamonga Di^aft Final Environmental InzEact Re~~ort ~~ All projects will be required to comply with the following: Applicable City ordinances regulating dust control associated with grading, construction, surface mining, and building demolition; California Vehicle Code Sections 23114 and 23115, regulating construction vehicles, which haul construction materials, to be enforced by the City Police Department. Compliance with these programs is expected to substantially reduce construction-related PM~o and PMZ.;, emissions. hi addition, federal and State regulations will be enforced to reduce emissions from construction equipment. Enforcement responsibilities lie with agencies other than City agencies. Long-Tern: Emissions Loeb tens emissions can be estimated using SCAQMD air pollutant emission models. The following assumptions have been made in estimating average daily emission levels: The cummlative project area will be built out as identified in the City General Plan. The traffic generated will be as described in the Traffic Study performed for this EIR • Due to the large number of vehicles expected in the region as a result of development, the level of emissions will be significant for all major pollutants. Consistency with AQMP •' The SCAG Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP) for the South Coast Air Basin contains strategies for reducing air pollutant emissions regionally as required by the federal Clean Air Act, the State Lewis Air Quality Act, and the Air Quality Management District. The SCAQMD's Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP) recognizes that growth will continue at regional and sub regional levels, and accounts for specific growth trends in the future pollutant load projections. If a project or group of projects is consistent with growth policy, then the project or group of projects is considered consistent with the AQMP. While the level of estimated pollutant emissions associated with the project or projects may be significant, the level of impact lies within the parameters established by the AQMP. The mitigation programs presented here represent incremental, long-range approaches aimed toward minimizing the pollutant emissions associated with new development (i.e., regional growth). If the land use policy assumptions used in this cumulative a~ralysis are adopted, long-term air pollutant emissions can be expected to exceed the limits established by the AQMP. This inconsistency will result in significant unplaimed for impacts on air quality. Since urbanization of the region will contribute to non-attaimneut of current AQMP standards, the cwnulative affects to air quality will be significantly adverse and unavoidable. V-6 September 2011 N~ilsorr Avenue Extension (East) City of Rancho Cucamonga Drcft Fincrl Erzviromnental Lnpact Repor/ ~~ Mitigation Measw•es CUMU-7 Air pollution reduction programs contained in the City's Air Quality Element, and programs and regulations enforced by the SCAQMD, will be applied to all future development projects. Level of Impact After Mitigation Even with compliance with existing regulations and development requirements, the incremental increase in average daily pollutant emissions from mobile sources as a result of this project will contribute to significant and unavoidable unpacts. Incremental project impacts will also contribute cumulatively to the regional non-attaimnent of AQMD air quality standards and improvement goals for some pollutants. The City will be required to adopt a Statement of Overriding Considerations. 6. Open Space and Conservation This section addresses the overall ongoing and anticipated loss of open space as development occurs in the cumulative impact project area. Many of these topics are also discussed in separate sections of this cumulative impact analysis. See, in particular, Section 8 of this analysis for a discussion of cumulative impacts on biological conservation efforts. • Ongoing and plamzed development within the cumu]ative impact project area will, by definition, reduce the amount of land available for open space and conservation. General Plan open space and conservation programs, policies, and standards iu the Resource Management and Public Health & Safety Element are intended to implement the objectives listed above and avoid significant project envirormiental impacts. With consistent implementation of General Plan open space and conservation policies, programs, and standards, significant cumulative impacts related to open space and conservation will be minimized. i Level of Impact This project will not result in significant cumulative impacts to open space and conservation ~~ It should be noted that, subsequent to the distribution of this document, the City is considering a Reduced hrrprovement (Alternative C) scope 1ha1 would avoid any impcrcls to fhe conservation easement estaGlished by the County of San Bernardino Flood Control District. Alternative C is discussed in Chapter V, Section D.3. of this document. Mitigation No mitigation is required • V-7 September 2011 i~Vilso~z Avenue Extension (East) City of Rancho Cucamoiaga Draft Final Environme»tal Impact Report • 7. Agricultural Resources The growth-inducing impacts of individual development projects ou agricultural operations are cumulatively significant. Unless protected under the Williamson Act contracts, farmland which abuts an urban development will face rising property tax assessments based on the prevailing market land values. Some farmland owners may find it more profitable to sell rather than remain in the fanning business. Others who wish to remain may not be eligible to participate in the Williamson Act. These growth- inducing impacts may lead to the conversion of farmland and allow for the possibility of leapfrog development. City policy is that only those land uses consistent with Williamson Act regulations will be permitted on properties subject to Williamson Act contracts as long as such contracts are in effect for the properties. The City shall ensure by means of it's regulatory authority that all developments adjacent to existing agricultural uses shall incorporate setbacks and other buffers as appropriate to minimize urban rural land use conflicts. Impacts u The study area does not contain substantial agricultural resources and thus, the cumulative loss of agricultural land will not be significant. Level of Impact This project will not result in significant cumulative impacts to or the sig~uficant loss of agricultural lands. 8. Biological Resources The relatively undeveloped nature of the area has facilitated the preservation of land for significant biological resources in the region. hl particular, habitat for the San Bernardino kangaroo rat (SBKR), California gnatcatcher, Quino checkerspot butterfly, raptor foraging, and sensitive plan communities and wetlands has been protected through regional conservation. htcreasing urbanization of the region will create unavoidable conflicts with these sensitive resources. Development within the cumulative project area has the potential to adversely impact native habitats and areas important to wildlife. Also, by replacing agricultural land uses with urban development, cLUnulative development may eliminate open foraging areas used by raptors, larger mammals, as well as wildlife movement con-idors through the area. h~dividual project impacts can be addressed through complia~~ce with applicable protection ]aws (such as the State and federal Endangered Species Acts, the . Clean Water Act, and the California Fish and Game Code). V-8 September 2011 Wilson Avenue Extension (Eost) City of Roncho Cucnnrongn Draft Final Enviroaunental Gnpcrct Report • Conservation Efforts Regional impacts to biological resources are being addressed at a regional policy level. The HCP protects permanent preserve areas for the species and allows development to occur on occupied SBKR habitat. Inrpncts to Protected Specres Urbanization of the study area may result in the loss of habitat occupied by species protected under federal and State laws. "Take' of protected species may occur. Broadly, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) defines "take" to include any activity that would harm or harass a protected species. Take of protected species is illegal under the State and federal Endangered Species Acts unless Incidental Take Permit (ITP) (or federal ESA section 7 consultation, where applicable) has first been obtained. Adverse affects to protected species and/or their habitat will be mitigated tlu-ough obtaining required permits by individual projects prior to construction. Lrrpncts to Raptor Foraging Hnbitnt It is anticipated that cumulative development activity within the study area will eventually eliminate nearly all foraging habitat which occurs on slopes less than 25%. Individually, specific projects would not be expected to significantly incrementally impact the raptors that use these lands for foraging. However, the cwnulative loss of foraging area is significant given that urbanization within the cumulative project area continues to reduce the acreage available to foraging raptors. Regional impacts to raptor foraging habitat may best be mitigated through broad-based conservation planning programs or tluough the State's plaamed Natural Communities Conservation Planning (NCCP) program. Until such a program is in place, however, individual development projects may reduce or fragment foraging area. Cumulative effects to raptors will be significant. Lnpncts to Native Habitats Development tlu-oughout Southet-n California has substantially reduced coastal sage scrub habitat. Within the cumulative project area, hillside areas can be expected to be protected due to their steep grades, which make them unsuitable for development The incremental cumulative contribution the project would make to cumulative habitat loss is not considered significant. The project may add incrementally to cumulative impacts interfering with wildlife movement tlu-ough the region. Inrpnets to Waters and II'etlnnds In the absence of definitive development plans and mapping of isolated wetland pockets that may occur tlu-oughout the study area, the overall loss of wetlands and riparian areas associated with waters of the U.S. camrot be accurately estimated. However, per requirements established by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the California Department of Fish and Gatne, developers of individual projects will be required to identify on-site wetlands and ensure that no net loss of wetlands occurs due to project implementation. Developers must either protect identified wetlands in place or replace eliminated wetlands. Compliance with existing federal and state regulations relating to wetlands can reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels. V-9 September 2011 hVilson Avenue Extension (East) City of Rancho Cucamonga Drcf Final Environmental Impact Report Level of Impact After Mitigation This project will not result in significant cumulative impacts to protected species or regulated habitats, waters or wetlands. It should be noted that, subsequent to the dish'rbutlon of this document, the Ciry is considering a Reduced hrrprovwnerrt (Alternative C) scope that would reduce impacts to biological resources. Altenrative C is discussed in Chapter V, Section D. #. of this docznnent. 9. Cultural Resources CEQA requires that all significant cultural resources (including archeological, historical, paleontological and religious resources) be identified and assigned a level of scientific significance prior to adoption of an EIR. The City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department reviews proposed projects to ensure significant cultural resources are protected. This process is designed to ensure that significant cultural resources, such as historic sites, buildings, objects, and archeological sites are avoided, preserved or salvaged prior to development, as appropriate. hi addition, since sub-surface artifacts may be present on any site, State requirements call for a qualified archeologist to be on-call for construction monitoring and evaluation of any artifacts unearthed during construction activities. In consultation with other appropriate agencies, the City develops mitigation measures appropriate for each project. Development of the region could result in adverse impacts to known archeological and historical resources. It may also result in the discovery of previously unknown resources via grading and other land-disturbing activities involved in construction. Increasing populations in the area, as a result of urbanization, are likely to cause adverse effects to existing resources through vandalism, illegal collecting, and hwnan presence. Mitigation Measures CUMU-8 Development will avoid damaging effects on archaeological resources. Par resources in which avoidance is not feasible, mitigation will be provided as reconunended by the archaeologist and as described in Supplementary document J of the CEQA Guidelines. In general, these guidelines require the following: a. Preservation of sites in place as the preferred mamrer of avoiding damage to historic and prehistoric resources. b. Stopping of excavation in the event of discovery of human remains until the Coroner has determined that no investigation of the cause of death is required; or, if descendants have made a recommendation of the property owner regarding proper disposal of the remains, or until descendants have failed to make a recommendation within 24 hams of notification. If no reconnnendation is received, remains will be interred with appropriate dignity on the property in a location not subject to fm-ther development. V-10 September 2011 Wilson Avenue Extension (East) Draft Final Environmental Impact Report • Ciry of Rancho Cucamonga CUMU-9 Any blush removal and/or surface disturbing activity (soils or geologic testing, or clearing in preparation for grading) near all alluvial areas shall be monitored by a qualified archaeologist. Should archaeological material appear during this work, the archaeologist shall be empowered to halt or redirect the clearing or grading until appropriate archaeological recovery can be made. CUMU-10 Excavation in areas likely to contain paleontological resources will be monitored by a qualified vertebrate paleontological monitor. This monitor will be empowered to halt construction activities as necessary to prrotect any resources uncovered. CUMU-] 1 For identified unique archeological resources, Phase II testing/evaluation will be completed. This testing will include supplemental mapping, surface collections, subsurface excavations, and recovery of samples. If results indicate the resources are significant, a mitigation plan to lessen adverse impacts will be implemented. The testing of these sites must be completed prior to the issuance of any grading permit(s). If any of the sites are found to be significant and avoidance is not possible, Phase III investigations (data recovery) will be performed. All efforts to be undertaken in conjunction with local tribes. CUMU- 12 The historical sites within project areas will be tested prior to issuance of any grading permit(s). Efforts will be made to avoid and/or minimize effects to historical sites • deemed significant. If any sites deemed significant that will be impacted by the project, Phase II testing (acrd where necessary, Phase III investigations) must be completed. CUMU-13 Where appropriate, impacts to historical structures will be minimized by moving the site(s) to preservation site(s) within the study area. Level of Significance With Mitigation It is assumedu}cremental project impacts will conhibute cumulatively to adverse impacts to cultural resources in the region, but not to a level of significance. 10. Circulation and Traffic A traffic report (Technical Appendix D) was prepared to assess cumulative traffic impacts and to define the circulation system required to serve projected future cumulative traffic volumes. The report findings and reconmrendations are summarized here. Area wide growth, as well as approved future developments within the study area, has been accounted for within the Comprehensive Transportation Plan Model maintained by the Southern California Association of Govermnents (SCAG). For Year 2020 traffic conditions without the project, levels of service for study area intersections vary •~ from LOS A to LOS F. For Year 2020 conditions with the project, but without off-site improvements, conditions vary from LOS A to LOS F. For Year 2020 traffic conditions n~ith the proposed development V-11 September 2011 Wilson Ai~ernre Extension (East) City of Rancho Cucamonga Draft Finnl Em>irm~mental Impact Report • and with off-site improvements, conditions are projected to operate at LOS C/D or better during peak morning and evening hours. To analyze the long-term cumulative impacts on the future circulation system in the study area, the traffic model runs performed by the project traffic engineer incorporated the land use assumptions for the Wilson Avenue Extension (East) project area. The analysis assumed a buildout year of 2020. It is also assumed that all road improvements will be consistent with City Public Worlcs Department requirements. The level of cumulative traffic impact will be adverse and sigrificant in the absence of mitigation. • • It is also anticipated, however, that additional mitigation will be required at the City's discretion on an individual project basis. Mitigation Measures CUMU-14 As a means of mitigating the cumulative, significant regional traffic impacts associated with buildout within the study area, the project traffic engineer has developed a reconunended circulation system. This system will allow virtually all road segments to operate at LOS C or better. Additional measures, as provided in Chapter IV, Section A, will also be necessary to minimize cumulative impacts to circulation. Level of Impact After Mitigation Implementation of City-required mitigation measures will allow almost all roadways within the traffic study project area to operate at LOS C or better. However, some road segments will experience LOS D conditions. In the absence of additional policies promulgated by the City, incremental project impacts will contribute cumulatively to significant averse traffic and circulation impacts ui the region. A Statement of Overriding Concern will be necessary. 11. Water and Sewer Service Development withni the cumulative project area will result in increased domestic water consumption and increased sewage generation. Proposed new development will demand new water and sewer trunk lines, as well as sewage treattnent facilities. Effective planning will ensure that future water, sewer, reclaimed water, and sludge management facilities will be adequate to serve the cumulative project area. Mitigation Measures No mitigation is required. Level of Impact This project will not result in significant cmmulative impacts to water or sewer services. V-12 September 201 I 17~ilson Avenue Extensio~r (Gast) Ci[y of Rancho Cucamonga Draft Final Enviroirmenlai 6npact Report • l2. Law Enforcement and Fire Protection Services hnplementation of the proposed project and other anticipated development within the cumulative project area will place a greater demand on existing law enforcement and fire protection services, as a result of increased area population. Daytime population in the area will also increase significantly with the development of commercial uses and Light industrial uses. Lmv Enforcement Services General Plan policy states that all proposed projects should be reviewed by the Rancho Cucamonga Police Department to assure the maximwn measure of crime prevention is provided. bi addition, the Rancho Cucamonga Police Department has established for following staffing standards: 1.5 officers per 1,000 population; one civilian personnel per seven sworn officers; and one patrol car per three sworn officers. Fire Protection Services According to national fire standards, a new fire station and/or engine company is required for 2,000 dwelling units, or an area including approximately 3,750,000 square feet of non-residential buildings. Required new fire stations will be financed via the residential development fee program described • above. General Revenue funds, collected via property taxes, will help pay for increased persomiel demanded by new development. Existing programs for funding additional fire protection services will reduce cumulative impacts to less than significant levels. Fire Hazards • The project site is not within a hazardous fire area. A portion of the cumulative impact study area is within the Hazardous Fire Area, as defined by the Hemet General Plan. New developments within this area will be required to comply with the land use standards of the General Plan's Fire Protection Section of the Public Facilities and Services Element. The standard includes requiring roofs, eaves, and siding to be constructed with Class Bfire-resistant materials, a buffer of fire-retardant landscaping, and water facility improvements. Adherence to these standards will aid in reducing the risk for potentially significant fire hazards and minimizing need for fire protective services. Mitigation Measw•es No mitigation is required. Level of Impact This project will not result in significant cumulative impacts to law enforcement or fire protection services. V-13 September 20] ] IVilsorz Avenue Ester~siorr (East) Ciry of Rancho C'ucanronga Draft Fnaal Ennirorrnrental Impact Report 13. Schools Mitigation Measures No mitigation is required. Level of Impact This project will not result in significant cumulative impacts to schools. 14. Parks and Recreation Loc«l «nd Convnunity Pru•klmufs The City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted the Quimby Act standard of 3.0 acres of active parkland per 1,000 population. Mitigation of this cumulative impact will occur at the individual project level. General Plan standards for developments include requu~ing provision of recreational facilities and/or opportunities for project residents. Dedication of sites as parkland and phasing of residential development ni coordination with the provision of par]<s and other public facilities/amenities are generally conditions for project apprroval. As long as impacts of individual development projects are mitigated to the satisfaction of the parks and recreation district(s), cumulative impacts of anticipated development on local/community parks and recreation resources will be less than significant. Mitigation No mitigation is required. Level of Impact Cumulative impacts to parks and recreation facilities will be below the level of significance. 1.5. Libraries Project Environmental Impacts/Relationship to General Plan Policies The City's library services continue to be somewhat strained, and the increased population in the future can be expected to exacerbate the shortage of physical library space and book volumes. To help alleviate this strain, the City has instituted a residential development fee prograni. A portion of the fee collected for each new housing unit may be used to finance library expansion. Anew library is cun'ently under construction. All developers will be required to participate in the program, thereby • potentially adding funds to allow for library facility expansion V-14 September 2011 l~ilson Ai~enue Ezte~aion (East) Ciry of Rancho Cucamonga Draft Final Environmental bnpact Report • Mitigation • •'. No mitigation is required. Level of Impact Cumulative impacts to library resources will be below the level of significance. 16. Health Services A standard of 3 persons per unit and 3 beds per 1000 population is utilized for determining needed bed inventory. Current hospital bed inventory in the cumulative project area is under capacity. Impacts This project will not result in significant cumulative impacts to health services. Mitigation Measures No mitigation measures are needed for impacts to health services. i Level of Impact i Cumulative nnpacts to health services and facilities will be below the level of significance. 17. Solid Waste Anticipated development within the cumulative project area will result in an increase in the average daily amount of generated solid waste. This increase will strain existing capacity and will further deplete the capacity of existing landfills and hasten the need for additional landfills. Participation in fee payment and revenue collected from the area tax base will aid in funding for additional landfill space. However, this need must ultimately be addressed at the County or regional level. Compliance with the solid waste diversion requirements of AB 939 will assist in reducing impacts to solid waste disposal services. The City's aim is to have sufficient disposal capacity to meet the areas needs. Level of Impact cwnulative impact to solid waste facilities and services will be less-than-significant. V-15 September 2011 IVilso~z Avenue Exte~~sion (East) Cily of Ra~icAo Ca~can~ongcr Draft Final F_nvn-on~neiatnllr~zpact Repor[ • 18. Housing Regional housing needs are identified through the SCAG Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA) and coordinated with the City Plaiming Department. The City's General Plan, Housing Element, updated in September of 2001, establishes goals, policies and programs to assist in meeting the housing needs of the conunwrity. The City's primary housing goals as identified in the Housing Element are as follows: a. Equitable access to housing; b. Adequate provision of housing; c. Adequate housing sites; d. Preserve existing neighborhood and rehabilitate existing housing stock, and e. Maintain affordable housing costs. Level of Impact The project will not result in significant cumulative adverse impacts to housing within the larger area. Mitigation • No mitigation measures are necessary. B. SIGNIFICANT IRREVERSIBLE ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGES CEQA Guidelines define "significant effect" as a "substantial adverse change in any of the physical conditions within the area affected by the project.' hnpacts are not considered to be significant and adverse if potential impacts can be mitigated to an acceptable level. CEQA requires that, in determining whether or not to approve a project, the decision-making body must balance the benefts associated with the proposed project against the unavoidable enviromnental risks of the proposed project If the benefits of a proposed project outweigh the unavoidable adverse enviromnental impacts, the adverse affects may be considered "acceptable." (CEQA Guidelines, Section 15093) Where the decision of the agency allows the occurrence of impacts that are potentially significant even after mitigation which are identified in the Final EIR, the agency shall state in writing the specific and particular reasons to support its action to approve the project based on the Final EIR and other information on the record (Section 15093(b)). This statement is refereed to as a "Statement of Overriding Considerations.'' This statement will be prepared at the end of the CEQA review process, after the Final EIR has been completed. The significant in-eversible environmental effects resulting fiom Wilson Avenue Extension (East) that • , camrot be mitigated to below the relevant tlu-esholds of significance are as follows: V-16 September 2011 YVilsorz flven:re Extension (Ensi) ~ City of Rattcho Cucamonga Draft Final Em~ironmentcd b~r~act Report • L hrcrease in pollutant emissions particularly from mobile sources, resulting in adverse impacts to long-tens ambient air quality, both for project specific and cumulative impacts. 2. Project-specific and cumulative adverse impacts to biological resources The details associated with each of these significant impacts are provided in the respective Elements and/or Cumulative hnpacts Analysis of this environmental document. C. ALTERNATIVES TO TAE PROPOSED PROJECT This section considers various development alternatives for the project site and includes an analysis of the environmental impacts associated with each alternative. The adverse impacts as well as benefits of each alternative can be compared with each other as well as the proposed project. CEQA guidelines require that a range of alternatives be evaluated, "governed by a `rule of reason' that requires the EIR to set forth only those alternatives necessary to permit a reasoned choice" (Section 15126(d). 1. Overall Project Purpose • This section describes the development objectives and purpose of the City. The overall project purpose must be identifed and defined so that, fi-om an environmental standpoint, the development alternatives evaluated herein have a reasonable relationship to the overall project purpose. The Overall Project Purpose is as follows: The move toward full irnplerrrentation of the Circu/ntiorr Element of the General Plan of the City of Rmrclro Cucamonga. Implementation of the Circulation Element is the objective in that implementafions will result in more efficient traffic flow in the v'ea with a reduction ni veliicle miles traveled, thus having a positive impact ou air quality and greenhouse gas emissions. This project purpose is consistent with the goals and objectives of the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan. 2. Project Objectives In order to achieve the stated project purpose, the proposed project intends to implement the following prroject objectives: Complete an interim improvement as a step toward fulfilling the City's Circulation Element of making improvements to Wilson Avenue from Etiwanda to Wardmau Bullock Road. V-17 September 2011 • • u YVilson At=enue Estensiora (East) Draft Final Envirorrrnenlal Gnpact Report Table V.C-I. Alternative Impacts Comparison Matrix (Conrparerl wit/: proposer! project) Ciry ofRancho Cucamonga Issue/Im act Pro•ect Alternatives Alternative A No Build Alternative B Expanded banyan Alternative C Reduced Im ~rovement Resource Management/Public Health & Safe Agriculture cez Soils 0 0 0 O en S ace & Conservation + + + Water Resources 1. Water Quality + + 0 2. Drama e and li drolo + + 0 Biolo ical Resources + 0 + Geolo= and Soils 0 0 0 Hazardous Materials 0 0 0 Noise 0 0 0 Air Quality - Aesthetics 1. Li ht & Glare + 0 0 2. Scenic Highways 0 0 0 Cultural Resources + 0 0 Public Services and Facilities Trans ortation & Circulation - 0 0 Public Services 1. Schools 0 0 0 2. Libraries 0 0 0 3. Law Enforcement - 0 0 4. Fire Protection - 0 0 5. Parks & recreation 0 0 0 6. Solid Waste 0 0 0 7. Health Services 0 0 0 Utilities 1. Water 0 0 0 2. Sewer 0 0 0 3. Electrici 0 0 0 4. Natural Gas 0 0 0 5. Tele hone 0 0 0 6. Television 0 0 0 Housing 1. Housin 0 0 0 2. Jobs/Housing Balance 0 0 0 Key: +=Environmentally superior to the proposed project - =Environmentally inferior to the proposed project 0 =Neither superior or inferior to the proposed project V-18 September 2011 Wilson Avenue Exler2sio~i (L'ast) City of Rancho Cucamonga Draft Final Ersrironmerrlctl hnpact Reyort • D. ANALYSIS OF PROJECT ALTERNATIVES 1. Alternative A - No Brrild Implementation of Alternative A would maintain the existing conditions that are found on the project site today. The gap in Wilson Avenue beriveen Wardman Bullock Road and East Avenue would remain as is. This would continue to require that vehicular traffic h~aveling east and west on existing sections of Wilson Avenue divert to the north or south in order to arrive at points east or west of the project site. In that with the project, a gap in Wilson Avenue between East Avenue and Etiwanda Avernre will continue to exist, this alternative would not result in a significant amount of additional Vehicle Miles Traveled than would result from completion of the project. As noted below, it can be expected that implementation of this alternative would result in environmental impacts that are considerably less than those impacts associated with the project as proposed. This alternative would reduce the enviromnental impacts associated with slopes and erosion, flooding azrd drainage, water quality, open space and conservation, biological resources, cultural resom~ces and light and glare. a. Public I-iealth and Safety: (1) Seismic Safety -The implementation of Alternative A would not affect the conditions and potential for seismic activity in the area of the project. (2) Soils, Slopes and Erosion - Alternate A would not result in a significant increase or decrease in to soils, slopes and erosion would not be significantly different. (3) Wind Erosion -Implementation of Alternative A would not result in significant changes to the impacts associated with the project as proposed. (4) Flooding, Drainage and Dam Inundation -While Alternative A would reduce the amount of impervious development on the project site, it would not significantly alter the impacts of flooding, drainage and dam inundation from those impacts identified with the proposed project. (5) Noise - No development would result in less noise impacts on the existing residents of the immediate area, but would maintain existing noise impacts along current circulation routes such as Banyan. (6) Air Quality -The implementation of Alten~ative A would result in an increase in the impacts to air quality as~a result of maintaining the lugher levels of vehicle-miles-traveled that currently exist. (7) Water Quality - Alternative A would not result in signficant changes to the impacts identified • from the proposed project. (8) Water Supply - No development would reduce impacts on water supply facilities. V-19 September 2011 • • • Wilson Aneraue Extension (East) Draft Final Cnvironmer~tal hupact Report City of Rancho Cuccnnmaga (9) Toxic Substances - No significant changes to the impacts associated with the project as proposed. (10) Open Space and Conservation - Alternate A would avoid eneroaclunent into the conservation easement that results with the proposed project. This impact is not considered significant and thus, the iurpacts to open space and conservation would not be significantly different. (l 1) Agriculture - No significant changes to the impacts associated with the project as proposed. (12) Biological Resources -The proposed project does not result in significant This alternative would avoid any impacts to biological resources. (13) Energy Resources -The implementation of Alternative A would result in an increase in the consumption of energy resources in that eastlwest bound traffic would continue to be required to divert to the north or south, resulting in an increase in Vehicle Miles Traveled. (14) Scenic Highways - No significant changes to Che impacts associated with the project as proposed. (15) Cultural Resources - Alternative A would avoid any impacts to cultural resources associated with the project as proposed. (16) Mineral Resources - No significant changes to the impacts associated with the project as proposed. (17) Light and.Glare -The implementation of Alternative A would result in a decrease in light az1d glare in the immediate area.. b) Public Services and Facilities Element: (1) Traffic and Circulation -The implementation of Alternative A would result in an incremental increase in adverse impacts to traffic and circulation systems by eliminating the ability to complete the cormection of currently non-existent sections of Wilson Avenue, causing traffic to divert to the north or south and thus impacting those facilities and intersections. (2) Schools - Alternative A would not result in a significantly different impact to schools and school facilities. (3) Libraries -The implementation of Alternative A would not result in a significantly different impact to library facilities. (4) Law Enforcement - Alternative A would eliminate a more direct vehicular cormection to Bast Avenue and Wardman Bullock Road and thus prohibit a reduction in efficient access and response times of law enforcement. V-20 September 2011 Id~ilsor2 flrer7ue Extension (East) Draft Fixal Environmental Impact Report Ciry ofRarrd~o Cucamonga • (5) Fire Protection - Alternative A would eliminate a more direct vehicular connection to East Avenue and Wardman Bullock Road and thus prohibit a reduction in efficient access and response times of fire protection services. (6) Parks and Recreation - Alternative A would not result in a significantly different impact to parks and recreation facilities. (7) Solid Waste -The implementation of Alternative A would not result in a significantly different impact to solid waste facilities. (8) Health Services - Alternative A would not result in a significantly different impact to health services and facilities. (9) Water and Sewer -The implementation of Alternative A would not result in significantly different impacts on water service facilities and no impact on wastewater treatment facilities. (10) Electricity - Alternative A would not result in a significantly different impact to electricity service and facilities. (I 1) Natural Gas - Alternative A would not result in a significantly different impact to natural gas service and facilities. (12) Telephone - Alternative A would not result in a significantly different impact to telephone service and facilities. (13) Television - Alternative A would not result in a significantly different impact to television service and facilities. c) Housing Element The implementation of Alternative A would not have any impacts to the housing opportunities that would result from the proposed project. d) Conclusion: Alternative A Alternative A, (No Build) is considered an envirormtentally inferior alternative in that while some impacts are generally reduced incrementally from the impacts resulting from the proposed project, the adverse impact to traffic and circulation resulting by not building ibis segment of Wilson Avenue would be significant and would more than offset any enviromnental gains achieved by Alternative A. Additionally, implementation of Alternative A however, would mead that the project's primary objectives would not be achieved with implementation of this altentative. V-21 September 2011 iVilsorr Avenue Extension (East) Cil~~ of Rancho Cucamonga Draft Final Environmental Impact Report • 2. Alternative B - "E.rpmrded Ban~~arr Route" This alternative assumes that Banyan Avenue, the primary route that would be used by those who would utilize the proposed section of Wilson Avenue, would be improved and expanded so as to increase its capacity to can~y traffic between East Avenue and Wardman Bullock Road. This alternative would avoid the environmental impacts associated with noise, air quality, water quality, traffic and circulation, open space and conservation, biological resources, energy resources, cultural resources, mineral resources, and light and glare. Additionally, this alternative would also result in no impacts on land use, seismic safety, soils, slopes and erosion, flooding arrd drainage, al the service facilities and service capabilities such as fire and police protection, schools, libraries, parks and recreation, etc. Population, housing and employment would not be impacted by the implementation of this alternative. Alternative B, "Expanded Banyan Route" is considered the environmentally superior alternative. Implementation of Alternative B would also mean that the project's objectives would not be achieved. The various infrastructure improvements and extension of facilities and services would not be available for public use. • a. Public Health and Safety: (1) Seismic Safety -The implementation of Alternative B would not affect the conditions and potential For seismic activity in the area of the project. (2) Soils, Slopes and Erosion - Alternate B would not result in a significant increase or decrease in to soils, slopes and erosion would not be significantly different. (3) Wind Erosion -Implementation of Alternative B would not result in significant changes to the impacts associated with the project as proposed. (4) I'Iooding, Drainage and Dam Inundation - Alternative B would not significantly alter the impacts of flooding, drainage and dam inundation from those impacts identified with the proposed project. (5) Noise - Alternative B would result in less noise impacts on the existing residents of the innnediate project site but increased noise levels in the Banyan area. (6) Air Quality -The implementation of Alternative B would result in an increase in the impacts to air quality as a result of maintaining the higher levels of vehicle-miles-traveled that currently exist. (7) Water Quality - Alternative B would not result in significant changes to the impacts identified • from the proposed project. V-22 September 2011 Wilson Avenue Exlensioaa (East) Draft Final Environmental Impact Report City ofRancho Cucamonga • (8) Water Supply - No development would reduce impacts on water supply facilities. (9) Tosic Substances - No significant changes to the impacts associated with the project as proposed. (10) Open Space and Consevation - Alternate B would avoid the encroachment into the conservation easement that results with the proposed project. This impact is not considered significant and thus, the impacts to open space and conservation would not be significantly different. (11) Agriculture - No significant changes to the impacts associated with the project as proposed. (12) Biological Resources -The proposed project does not resu]t in significant impacts to biological resources and the impacts to biological resources associated with Alternative B would not be significantly different. (13) Energy Resources -The implementation of Alternative B would result iu an increase in the consumption of energy resources in that east/west bound traffic would continue to be required to divert to the north or south, resulting in an increase in Vehicle Miles Traveled. (14) Scenic Highways - No significant changes to the impacts associated with the project as proposed. • (l5) Cu]tm'al Resources - No significant changes to the impacts associated with the project as proposed (16) Mineral Resources - No significant changes to the impacts associated with the project as proposed. (17) Light and Glare -The implementation of Alternative B would result in a decrease iii light and glare in the immediate area, but increased light and glare in the Banyan area. b. Public Services and Facilities Element: (1) Traffic and Circulation -The nnplementation of Alternative B would result in an incremental increase in adverse impacts to traffic and circulation systems by eliminating the ability to complete the connection of currently non-existent sections of Wilson Avenue, causing traffic to divert to the north or south and thus impacting those facilities and intersections. (2) Schools - Alternative B would not result in a signfcantly different impact to schools and school facilities. (3) Libraries -The implementation of Alternative B would not result in a significantly different impact to library facilities. (4) Law );nforcement - Alternative B would eliminate a more direct vehicular comlection to East Avenue and Wardman Bullock Road and thus prohibit a reduction in efficient access and response times of law enforcement. V-23 September 2011 u L~ Wilson Avenue Extension (East) Draft Final Envnronmentcrl hnpact Report City of Rancho Cucamonga (5) Fire Protection - Alternative B would eliminate a more direct vehicular connection to East Avenue and Wardman Bullock Road and thus prohibit a reduction in efficient access and response times of fire protection services. (6) Parks and Recreation - Alternative B would not result in a sigrlificurtly different impact to parks and recreation facilities. (7) Solid Waste -The implementation of Alternative B would not result in a significantly different impact to solid waste facilities. (8) Health Services - Alternative B would not result in a significantly different impact to health services acrd facilities. (9) Water and Sewer -The implementation of Alternative B would result in a decrease in Ure impacts on water service facilities and no impact on wastewater treatment facilities. (10) Electricity - Alternative B would not result in a significantly different impact to electricity service and facilities. (11) Natural Gas - Alternative B would not result in a significantly different impact to natural gas service and facilities. (12) Telephone - Alternative B would not result in a significantly different impact to telephone service and facilities. (13) Television - Alternative B would not result in a significantly different impact to television service and facilities. c. Housing Element The implementation of Alternative B would not have any impacts to the housing opportunities that would result from the proposed project. d. Conclusion: Alternative B Alternative B, (Expanded Banyan) is considered an environmentally superior a]ternative in that some impacts are reduced incrementally from the impacts resulting fiom the proposed project. Additionally, the impact to traffic and circulation resulting by the exparrsion of the capacity of Banyan would result hl a superior circulation system than Alternative A. Implementation of Alternative B however, would mean that the projects primary objectives would not be achieved with hnplementation of this alternative. • V-24 September 2011 Wrlson Avenue Extension (East) C'r1y of Rancho Cucamonga Draft Final Environnrenlul h~zpact Report • 3. Alternative C- "Reduced Laaproneaaaeut" Since the distribution of the draft EIR, the City of Rancho Cucamonga has determined that a reduced improvement project would reduce impacts to conservation and biological resources and thus reduce mitigation costs associated with those impacts. Figure V-2 illustrates the biological impacts associated with this alternative. Alteruative C proposes to improve Wilson Avenue with two lanes of traffic, one east and one west, witlvn an improved section that occupies the southern potion of the ultimate right-of- way. The project footprint for Alternative C is 10.44 acres, reduced by 2.24 acres (17.7%) from the 12.68 acres originally proposed. Figure V-1 illustrates typical cross sections for Alternative C. This alternative would not result in any revised impacts on land use, seismic safety, soils, slopes and erosion, flooding urd drainage, on the service facilities and service capabilities such as fire and police protection, schools, libraries, parks and recreation, etc. Population, housing and employment would also not be impacted by the implementation of this alternative. Alternative C, "Reduced Improvement" is considered the environmentally superior alternative. Iu~plementation of Alternative C would also mean that the project's objectives would not be completely achieved. The reduced infrastructure improvements would not impact the extension of facilities and services available for public use. • • V-25 September 201 I Wilson Avenue Extension (Ensl) Draft Final Environmental Impact Report City of Rancho Cucarna~ga ~~ Pigure V-l Alternative C -Cross Section EXIST. N'LY R/W SECTION LINE I • -_1 EXIST. ~ S'LY RW . 30'. I `.. 26' 11' ~. EP ~ ~ 1' o . 1' \ BENCH ~ ~. PROP. S'LY RW 46' 40' . 39, 8" C&O AC. PAVEMENT 1.79 2"x4" REDWOOD HEADER WILSON AVENUE 76+51.12 TO STA. 82+85.80 N. T S. l J I ~i 2, i 29 I ~~ ' ~ / 4" THICK Lf ` Ae SIDEWALK 19' V-26 September 201 I Ghilson Avenue L'xlension (East) Ciry of Rancho Cucamonga Draft Fi»al Envirom~7entcrl bnpact Report a. Public Health and Safety: (1) Seismic Safety -The implementation of Alternative C would not affect the conditions and potential for seismic activity in the area of the project. (2) Soils, Slopes and Erosion - Alternate C would not result in a signifcant increase or decrease in to soils, slopes and erosion would not be significantly different. (3) Wind &rosion -Implementation of Alternative C would noti result in significant changes to the impacts associated with the project as proposed. (4) Flooding, Drainage and Dam Inundation - Alternative C would not significantly alter the impacts of flooding, drainage and dani inundation from those impacts identified with the proposed project. (5) Noise - Alternative C would result in incrementally less noise impacts on the existing residents of the immediate project site. (6) Air Quality -The implementation of Alternative C would result in a decrease in the impacts to air quality as a result of reducing vehicle-miles-traveled that currently exist. (7) Water Quality - Alternative C would not result in significant changes to the impacts identified from the proposed project. (8) Water Supply - No development would reduce impacts on water supply facilities. (9) Toxic Substances - No significant changes to the impacts associated with the project as proposed. (10) Open Space and Co~iservation -Chapter III, Section A of this document fully discusses the existing conservation easement established by the County of San Bernardino Flood Control District The project as originally proposed and described in this document encroached into this easement This encroaclunent raised concerns regarding the adverse effect in conserving land and habitat resources. The scope of the project was reduced to address this issue, among others. Alternative C discussed herein describes this `reduced scope' project and the resulting environmental impacts. Impacts "lhe alignment and improvement of Wilson Avenue proposed as Alternative C will avoid the conservation easement and thus have no impact on the conservation easement. (1 I) Agriculture - No significant changes to the impacts associated with the project as proposed. V-27 September 2011 i~Vilson Avenue Extension (East) City of Rancho Cucamonga Draft Final Environmental Impact Report • (12) Biological Resources - A comprehensive discussion of the baseline data, existing enviromnental conditions and resources, as well as applicable regulatory statutes and requirements have been provided with consideration of the original proposed project and can be found in Chapter III, Section C of this document. San Bernardino Kangaroo Rat (SBKR) To understand the potential impacts of the revised project, Toni Dodson & Associates (TDA) conducted a focused SBKR trapping survey along the proposed project area between March 12 and 17, 2011. The full report and analysis is included as Appendix F of this document. No SBKR were trapped during the survey. Impacts The project will not result in the loss of this federally list species. The project will, however, result in the modification of critical habitat. The project will thus be required to consult with U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service to address impacts to SBKR critical habitat It should be noted that areas within the project site contain bare compacted ground (existing traveled dirt road), concrete or non-native ruderal vegetation. Since these areas have no potential to support SBKR, there are no impacts to SBKR in these areas the City does not propose to mitigate impacts to those • specific areas. Calculated impacts to suitable, although unoccupied SBKR critical habitat total 4.0 acres. This total area is comprised of 2.50 acres of temporary impacts and 1.50 acres of permanent impacts. Mitigation BIO-8* Temporary impacts of 2.5 acres will be mitigated at a 1:1 ratio by means of on- site, post-construction restoration. BIO-9~ Permanent impacts to 1.50 acres will be mitigated at a 2:1 ratio by means of purchase of 3.0 acres from an approved mitigation laud bank. Level of Impact The mitigation measures identified above will reduce project-related impacts of Alternative C to a less than sigiuficant level. Jurisdictional Delineation In conjunction with the SBKR survey, fieldwork for a jurisdictional delineation was also conducted on March 14, 2011. A full discussion of the field work conducted is included in Appendix P of this document. Permanent impacts were calculated by multiplying the drainage V-28 September 2011 • Wilson Avenue Extension (East) Draft Final E~mironrnental Impact Report Cily of Rancho Cucamonga width by the f 11 length and then converting to acres. Temporary impacts have been calculated by multiplying the drainage width by the construction action area and then converting to acres. The proposed project aligiunent crosses over two umiamed, dry, soft bottom stream courses and one concrete-lined chamrel (Etiwanda Creek Channel). Impacts Calculated impacts to jurisdictional waters total 0.22 acres. This total area is comprised of 0.15 acres of temporary impacts and 0.07 acres of permanent impacts. Mitigation BIO-10* Temporary impacts of 0.15 acres will be mitigated at a 1:1 ratio via SAWA or the Inland Empire Resource Conservation District. BIO-11 * Permanent impacts to 0.07 acres will be mitigated at a 2:1 ratio (0.14 acres) via SAWA or the Inland Empire Resource Conservation District. u Level of Impact The mitigationmeasures identified above will reduce project-related impacts of Alternative C to a less than significant level. California Gnatcatcher (CAGNI Tom Dodson & Associates (TDA) conducted a Focused Coastal California Gnatcatcher field survey firom March 28, 2011 to May 9, 2011. The complete survey report and analysis is included in Appendix G of this document. The project site is not located witlrin designated critical habitat for the CAGN. No CAGN were observed during the survey. Impacts Alternative C will not result in significant adverse impacts to the California Coastal Gnatcatcher. • V-29 September 2011 R U Q ~7 v a ~ ~ W ~~~ Y Y Y Y Y ~ Vu ~ /~ ! N ^ d ~Y S ~Qi~ 1~ M~ !) ~ ~ W W N h ~o .~ `f till' L ~ e F ~ a___nef ~1• ~<~~orv_o = wua A~ X Qz ~ m ~. r ~ Q go~a~a W o~ o ~~ a ~"3z ti NF ~ ~ <~ _ ~~ O 2 M~ oU ~ ~2 ~ w ISIg. ~~o N~ m o a y~ ~aad~,,,~~ 8 ¢ ~o a Z K¢ r o 0 0~ o oa ° <a~O~~ ~S 9 l z n dam ~+} o U O ~ ~ ~° ~ ~"Z N z~ 4 0° G ,LTLII ggqg ._ ~ Z ~ ~U ~3 ] 7~ ~ ~ v p a~ ; O W ~ ) j TTT a Q o Y a~~+~Q ~ 1`--~ 2W~~a q ~~ ~ ~,~~~,1,a \, ,•,~ I _, ,~1P~i~1 - 11., ~, ,~ ~ h .~ ~ ~ II ar:/ ~~; ~~\~';~~~~ I,,, ~\\\,,~.ti,, I ~~ :., „I h , ~ t 1 ~,~~ ~ .. , ,~,,1 ~~ `' ~ . 1, I v~ I ~J I ~' ~~ 1 1 { 1 ,. ; I ~~ l{ ~I , A II l' II IIi{f1j1111 = ~~.~. ~ ~,•} '1111{I 1 ~ I ~ I i i I - _ - i~ ~. 1`~~th~ ~ ! l} , ~,~ ~• ~ adoa ~~oi~na ; NdwQ~dM ~ ~ _ ~~~-~~ li nti .~ II, . 1~ ~~ ~ 1 y ~ 1 ~ •i ~ I ~--t - ~_ 1 ,` ~ ~ i ~ !;i~, t,l ~ ~ ~ ~ t{~, ~ I ~ l ~.,I ~ ~ P~ ~ ~IC~. I ~~ ~`` I { ~~ ~ ~ I II i 1 ~ 1~~, ~ i, (f\ 1 1 I ~I l ~~ l.1 'I I I ~: 1 A~. ~. I ~ ~. ~.. ~ ~1 l;% 1 I 7 { ~ , `II ~1., 1 i { --~ , -_ i~,._L y it ,• 1, I '° `I ~ 1I I li ~ 1. { ~ i. ~vv It 1. -~,~~ I ili illl~;'~,-ti llf;' it ~ ~~ (~:~, i, ~ ~~~ ~j ,ti1.~~" I !I ~ ~- f 8~ i ' l I; P~, I I ll ~~~1~ ( ~ 1 ?tom ~ 1 ~ ,I l ~ I~ „/~~.~~+/~~ lbs.-. ~'i {..~ ,~`~~,.~' '~ ~~~ W ~ ~ ~i ~ ,~ ~ ~ 4 _ I~ ~-!h, ;j ~~-y ~~ t ~. I l I ' *h I'I Ii 1i ~. i; ~,;~} ~I~~ .`._ - / ; f.• ~ ~ it ~~E I { ~1~ ~ ~ W . ~• v IY: \~~ i \ r, j) ~- ~ y. T`~~',11 ~ 11i 1 I 1 ~ .I 1 \ t ~ ` ~1 I; ~ ~ ~1 ~ A l I I ~ ~~ ~~ it ~T~', !`1 ,~ ' ~ ` j z ,~~; ;`~ ~ ' ~ i II ~ { ~{ I~ .`ltil _ i ~ ~ 11 i f L, i , I I L •1 ` ~~'. I 1 1 y1 .I I 1 1 1 ~~i`F_ I mar= I ti Y ~. ~ _~ I ~u•~ / Ida) ~~ - 1 l~ ~. ~ ~ ~ e ~ ~ ~/r _ i ~ ', ,, i`,,~. ~~ \ ,I ,~t\. f ~~. 'f C ` i % _ .I it ~.A ~.~ Z. ~,~ 1 ~1 A \ 1~~~,~~~_ f vv~ i l ~.1~1~ 1 ~ I ` ~ ~4, ` 7, 1 I~~ ~, y_ I '~ ~~ ~ i t ~\ I ! ~ I 1 Sl ~~, ~~ I, \ I 1 J ~ l ~ ~ \M ~\ `~ I ~ \ ~ I 1(1 I 1 I l G' ~ ~ ~ i~ -. ~I r`~ I 6 \\~ .,C'.~.~,`'~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ,l .' ~ ~~, II trio ^ 1 ~ f + .~ • ~_ ~. u r I 1 ~, y ~ ~~ I 1 _, l i ~~'.h{III ~I, , 1~1\ t, ~ ~ ~ , ~ \\ ~C(~u 1~ I ~ v ' ~I • • • N~ilsan Avenue Extension (East) Crty o{Rancho Cucamonga Draft Final Em~n•onmentnl Inapacl Re~art (13) Energy Resow'ces -The implementation of Alternative C would result in a decrease in the existing consumption of energy resom'ces in that east/west bound traffic would be ab]e Yo utilize this direct comrection and thus Vehicle Miles Traveled would be reduced. (] 4) Scenic Highways - No significant chances to the impacts associated with the project as proposed. (] 5) Cultural Resources - No significant changes to the impacts associated with the project as proposed (16) Mineral Resources - No significant changes to the impacts associated with the project as proposed. (17) Light and Glare -The implementation of Alternative C-would result in a decrease in light and glare in the immediate area, but increased light and glare in the Banyan area. b. Public Services and Facilities Element (1) Traffic and Circulation -The implementation of Alternative C would result in a positive impact to the existing traffic and circulation system in the project area by completing the connection of the currently non-existent sections of Wilson Avenue and East Avenue, allowing traffic to utilize this direct east-west comrection, although at a reduced capacity from the projecC as originally proposed and described within this document. (2) Schools - Alternative C would not result in a significantly different impact to schools and school facilities. (3) Libraries -The implementation of Alternative C would not result in a sigrzificantly different impact to library facilities. (4) Law Enforcement - Alternative C would maintain a direct vehicular connection to East Avenue and Wardman Bullock Road and thus maintain efficient access and a reduction in response times of law enforcement. (5) Fire Protection - Altewative C would maintain a more direct vehicular comrection to East Avenue and Wardman Bullock Road and thus maintains efficient access and a reduction in response times of fire protection services. (6) Parks and Recreation - Alternative C would not result in a significantly different impact to parks and recreation facilities. (7) Solid Waste -The implementation of Alternative C would not result in a significantly different impact to so]id waste facilities. • (8) Health Services - Alternative C would not result in a significantly different impact to health services and 'facilities. V-31 September 2011 Nilson Are»ue Lxiensron (East) G'i/y of 2ancho Cuca~non~a Draft Final En»ironnzental bnpaG Report • (9) Water and Sewer -The implementation of Alternative C would result in an incremental decrease in the impacts on water service facilities and no impact on wastewater treatment facilities. (10) Elect-icit)~ - Alternative C would not result in a significantly different impact to electricity service and facilities. (11) Natural Gas - Alternative C would not result in a significantly different impact to natural gas service and facilities. (12) Telephone - Alternative C would not result in a significantly different impact to telephone service and facilities. (13) Television - Alternative C would not result in a significantly different impact to television service and facilities. c. Housing Element The implementation of Alternative C would not have any impacts to the housing opportunities that wou]d result from the proposed project. • d. Conclusion: Alternative C Alternative C, (Reduced Improvement Project Footprint) is considered an enviroivnentally superior alternative in that some impacts are reduced incrementally from the impacts resulting from the proposed project. Specifically, the impact to biological resources would be reduced incrementally as would mitigation costs to the City than those resulting from implementation of the project as originally proposed and described within this document. Implementation of Alternative C however, would mean that the project's primary objectives would not be fully achieved with implementation of this alternative. Implementation of this alternative does not prohibit the future improvements to ultimate right-of--way width and thus fully achieve the City's objectives regarding t-affic. and circulation. • V-32 September 201 ] i~~ilsnn Ave Extension (East) Draft Enviro~anrental hrrpaci Repart • City of Rancho Ctecanrongn. V[. PERSONS CONSULTED CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Tel: (909) 477-2700 Pax: (909) 477-2848 CITY HALL ~Jd~ninisb~ation: Mahdi Aluzri Deputy City Manager CITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES Engineering Services and Public Works De»arhnent Mark Steuer • Jeny Dyer Dan James Walter Stickney Romeo David Keimeth Fung Jolm Gillespie Plar~nir?g: Larry Henderson Rina Leung Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Senior Civil Engineer Senior Civil Engineer Associate Engineer Associate Engineer Assistant Engineer Traffic Engineer Principal Plamrer Senior Planner PUBLIC SAFETY Fire protection District: Mike Bell • Fire Chief VI-I September 201 l • u • Wilson Ave Extension (Eas/) Draft Environmental hnpcrcl Report City ofRoraclao Cucamonga. AEI•CASC Cmrsultine 937 S. Via Lata Ave., Suite SOU Colton, CA 92324 TeI: (909) 783-0101 Fax: (909)783-U1U8 AEI•CASC Cwasultin Teuna: Ceazar Aguilar Tom Nievez Aric Ton~eyson Steve Hosford Principal Plamting Director Engineer Engineer CONSULTANTS/TECHNICAL ANALYSES ANll REPORTS A. Focused San Bernardino Kangaroo Rat Trapping Survey Tom Dodson & Associates 2150 N. Arrowhead Avenue San Bernardino, CA 92405 (909) 882-3612 B. Histot'ical/Archaeological Resources Survey Report CRM TECH 1016 E. Cooley Drive, Suite A/B Colton, CA 92324 C. Focused Botanical Survey Tom Dodson & Associates 2150 N. Anrowhead Avenue San Bernardino, CA 9240 (909) 882-3612 D. Traffic Impact Analysis Kunzmau Associates 11 I 1 Town & Comttry Road, Suite 34 Orange, CA 92868 (714)973-8383 VI-2 September 201 I Wilson Avenue Extension (East) Draft Environmental Impact Report Volume II -Technical Appendices Lead Agency.' City of 12ancho Cucamonga Planning Department 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California (909)955-1872 Contact: Walt Stickney Prepared fm• the City b~~: • AEI-CASC Consulting, inc. 934 South Via Lata Strcct Colton, CA 92324 (909)783-0101 Contact: Tom Nievez Draft EIR -September, 2011 State Clearinghouse #2008071044 • Volume II Technical Appendices Table of Contents • Appendix A Focused San Bernardino Kangaroo Rat Trapping Survey Appendix B Historical/Archeological Resources Survey Report Appendix C Focused Botanical Survey Appendix D Traffic Impact Analysis Appendix E 1. Notice of Completion (NOC) 2. Notice of Preparation (NOP) 3. Letter responses to NOP 4. Initial Study 5. Comment Letter/Response to Comment Appendix F Focused San Bernardino Kangaroo Rat 201 1 Trapping Survey Appendix G Focused Coastal California Gnatcatcher Survey ~J Appendix A Focused San Bernardino Kangaroo Rat Trapping Survey i • E®Cl1SED SAf~! BERNARDIfVO E~A4'~~tARO® F.AT I D1PG~®MYS MERR1,41f111 P~6RVUS (SBf~.€~! ~'R.,4PPiP~If~ SIDV'~~6fwZ` I f=OR T~1~~.1f1fI~SOIi A~.~E6~UE EY~'EI~SI®I\! Pf~~~JFCT f3E~"!Nf~E~ ~ ~,AAI~DfVf~l6~ f31~1_Ie®C~: R®AD A~fD E~.S~ w"~,'Ei~f~E Cf~~° AE R~~E'~lCf-I® CI..IC~a6#~I:?@~RQ~,~ S~e6il BE'F~6~A.R!~If`o9® C®Df1~~°d', C~~a 6F~C?P.f~9A I.fSC~s -- ~rta~~a~nonr~~ ~e~f:, `~c~vtrnshoe~ 'f f~~r4~a, P~;~a~~ ~ ~~t~sl, ~ecife~~as 2`a, 2~, 2'7, anc9 2~, S.B.I~~f. Prepared for: The City of Rancho Cucamonga Cornmuniiy Development Department, Engineering Division 10600 Civic Center Drive P,ancho Cucamonga, California 91730 • (909) 477-2740 Prepared by: Tom Dodson 8: Associates 2150 N. Arrowhead Avenu° San Bernardino, California 92405 (909)882-3612 September 2007 Certification: I hereby certify that the statements furnished herein, and in the attached exhibits present data and information required for this Biological Survey to the best of my ability, and the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Federal Fish and Wildlife Permit No. TE094308-0 Shay E. Lawrey • i I • Wilson Avenue Extension Project between Wardman Bullock Road and Easl Avenue $ta't~F? $l! TABLE Qt= GORlTEi~TS CERTIFICATION li~!TF?ODUCfION AND SUMMARI' OL FINDINGS ............................................ ................ 2 BACI:GROUND Ih!FORP,4ATION ........................_.............................................. ................ Pelt 7-I IODOLOGY ................................................................................................ ................ 9 I:ESULTS ........................................................................................................... ................ 1 i CONCLUSIONS .................................................................................................. ................ 'i3 LITERATURE CITED .......................................................................................... ................ 'ii F1~3URE:3 t=figure 1 Regional Location Map ................................................................ ................ 3 Figure 2 Vicinity Loca.tion .......................................................................... ................ ~. 1=iyure 3 Project Site Locafion ................................................................... ................ 5 =figure 4 Trap line Locations ...................................................................... ................ 10 Figure 5 Site Photos ................................................................................. ................ 'i2 TABLES Table 1 Small Mammal Rodent Species Trapped Within the Wilson Avenue Extension Project Study Site .......................... ................ 11 APPENDICES Appendix A -Floral Compendium Appendix B -Observed Fauna List ~:e itzrzom;oi<r -ii- Trn:q Dc.usort 2:~'as::cu.i=s Wilson Avenue Extension Project • Between Wardman Bullock Road and East Avenue i 9. C~R'TI~1CP. 2 dOi~i CERTIFICATION: `7 hereby Gerrity that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this biological evaluation, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowleo'ge and belief. Fieldwerk conducted for this assessment was performed by me or under my o'irect supervision. I certify that 1 have not signed anon-disclosure or consultant confidentialiiy agreement with the project applicant or applicant's representative and that !have no financial interest in the p,rojecf." GATE: ~~ ~l/ ~/} SIGi~ED' s~ "epor~ uthor Fieldwork Pel iermerl By: I `~~- ~~ • Flame I F=ieldwork Perfem~ed [sy: Fieldwork Performed By: Name Fieldv/orl< Performed By: Name Name i • ne-ttznoa~~sai~R '~' TOf~F L70DSOi~6 F: FISSOCIP,TL-S Wilson Avenue Extension Project • Between Wardman Bullock Road and East Avenue SBKR Survey IfVTRODUCTiOi'~ At~D SUMMARY OF FIRfDtiVGS Tom Dodson & Associates (TD,4) has prepared this report to relay the findings of a protocol presence/absence trapping survey for the federally listed endangered San Bernardino kangaroo rat (Dipodomys rnerriami parvus) (SBKR) along the proposed Wilson Avenue e;aension project site between Wardman Bullock Road and Gast Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, California. The project site can be found on pages 573 and 574, in sections 2J, and 2A respectively of the 2007 Thomas Guide. The project site is located in the USGS -Cucamonga PeaL* Qt.ladrangle, 7.5 Minute Series, Township 1 North, Range 6 West, Sections 21, 22, 27, and 28 (Figures 1-3). The proposed project is located on the Etiwanda Creek alluvial fan. The elevation within the project area is aoprorimately 1,580 above mean sea level. The climate in this area is characterized by hot summers, mild winters and rainfall, which occurs alrnost entirely in the winter and early spring months. The average annual rainfall for the local area is about 19 inches. Average temperatures range from 38°F (degrees Fahrenheit) in January to zn average of 97°F in July. Winds occur from all directions, with onshore winds frorn the vaesUsouthwesf occurring during the day. At night, wind patterns reverse with an offshore flow generally coming from the east/northeast. These predominant wind patterns are broken by occasional winter storlrls arld Santa Ana winds. The latter are strong northerly or northeasterly dry winds, adhich occur during September through March. • The vegetation onsite were characterized by I~olland community types which are indicated by species dominance. Changes between adjacent Holland community types are often a fairly subtle process and frequently represents a shift in species dominance rather than species turnover. Many species, particularly weedy native and alien species, occur in scattered patches throughout the project site. Riversidean alluvial fan sage scrub (RAFSS) and non native ruderal were the two Holland community types easily noted in the project area. RAFSS is a regionally significant habitat type confined to river and creek floodplains of southern San Bernardino and northwest Riverside counties. RAFSS provides habitat for a variety of wildlife species, most of which are common, widespread, and can be observed in several community types. This habitat type also supports a myriad of regionally sensitive flora and fauna, unique to this region. Approximately 40% of the site is comprised of highly disturbed RAFSS. The Wilson Avenue extension project site falls within the historic range of SBKR and within habitat deemed critical for this protected species. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) determined the endangered statuses for SBKR in 1999, pursuant to the provisions of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (Act). This small mammal is highly specialized and has evolved in very dynamic riverine regimes, where seasonal and annual rainfall fluctuations, flooding, and drought are common. SBKR were once widespread, but their range has diminished significantly in recent decades. The primary causes of the decline is habitat loss and habitat degradation. During the five night protocol trapping session, no SBKR were found. • AE-11217.0075©KR -2 fOtYi DQr)$Ot'i ~: ASSOCI,~,TL--C i bVilson Avenue Extension Project • Betvreen V~!ardman Bullock Road and East Avenue I r=l~l1~"E o. ~~;~-:~`cr~f~i',!.~,:L L.~v,c4Tlr.~~d NiAE° • • I I ~~ ----- --- ~ , ~--- - -- - - r I J _... - _ ~ ~ -~~_ .; II I ~ ~`' ~ I ~~~, ~ ~ I l-1..._.- ' ~~1' ~~~ '~ I~ p -=terra c ..~ I I i z- r_ ~ ~: - ~ I I ~~~ ~` t ~~! ' ~" -- - • _ v,. _. ,i r,• ~ , -- ;. ., I r ~ ~ r ~ ,. r0 _ _ ... - I ! _. _. _.... _ ,_ ..` (,, ~ _ __ _ , .. _ - ~---~-.;~ L . . l ra I `~~ i - --r ' ~ ~t z _ __. tom' . ~;; _ REGI6NAL LOCATION , e ~' ~"~ !1 ~~ ~ ~F~roon..ni, tr. ~ _ yrr,r .~,^c,, ,+no s J~, , t~ ~ 's ryM mel,n ice. l m.a wtmiewm ~~ Bu!up faw N ;, ~~ .."~, - .pal -fu..~l? 7.- }ai 6 f1..nlina~, (`\ ~ o:° ~ ' ~',rjr ~ar N Bua . `V pOMe is 1 - ~ 4r _ ~ Maunl,r~ o Age e: r , r ~• E _ 1 ' ~\ `~'. ~?. ~ E~T [ni ~ fr si,e. 1^ Y _ awv _ ~ IAe, _\_~c uorenasi ~ ~j / f x' nm.~ r r ; f J`r t. ~ _rr J` ~ , f v F.wr,urn _ ~~ I 7 1 , A Ir { 1-' i, r ~ U. s e ewr.n , s9.r. ~,C.` I m ea<Ir Ganlen:Gr Yr ~ ~+ F s,e {~1L ~u.~nn.`n si. `~j~v ~ i.n^ n-B., w-R Sr ni:(AL. .J' ~ ~e-,. R:~,~ nmr wain+a n.....li~x~ ~ ~ ~. Y '~~ muppp •1• ~~ ,~ %i J / ; ~ ~,n~r„ n :I ~• ; rte, , Fa..~.rr. ._ _ _ )p l r tol am ~1.1 ~6~~ ~ p dry/' ~ - `~ ~ n,4~n~` R.wnsri nr.4~ . C.v n ~ f~,K L `n\dl n Few YRia ,el ~ r. tn`I~ p ~` nroeim >; ~~-`~ B ~ p:. :.n.: p,.ea~ ~ ,,c ~ :; aB~aK ~ ~ ,-.J o~zB.~ ~/ _'~ .~ L~nnan~. ~ .....",...~... a _..a_....._, ...._ I .. ------- r - ---~ AE-'11212007 SBKR ~- t QI'V~ L~oL~SJt'1 t~: l~'.s~'/~:~~~~ i_i Wilson Avenue Extension Project • Between Wardman Bullock Road and East Avenue ~ ~31;E~Fe ^JUfYG~` I Ff~URE ~. 1~IC!!V!-fY LC)G.~.TiC~('~ i• A~-17?l2U07 SDI<F Wilson Avenue Extension Project • Qetween Wardman Bullock Road and East Avenue _ $BKP SUI'V~ • ..sas®cs~.sv+~m~r.~ ~z~+~:saga-.xia.~-:sna~ao~•~••---r~-ar~>~c U [ -?' ~ d" / f~L,lp `.. ~r r ._..,/ ~ : ~` _ /~ s ~% / „ ~ " ~ -1~ \:~ ~ ~awn~a¢~.r . of "* H f~ 'i,\1., \ - II t \ _ ~1~ ~- ~ - , ~T % , i ----- - .- ~'C~ III -~ .'~ ~~ l,i ~ ~ ~ ,~;~' ! ` \ ~Y~ . 2~-` ~~ 852'' ~l '` 2/~~ ~; ~:~.,-f r~~'` - Y'~~s`:~ ~,^~.~ _ _ = _ ; ~ ~ / I \ '~ I ` ~ /• II L / Op/ ~~ E ` h ,\ \ r4f / I '' , .ice---'•.-\ I ~- / .~ J - d _ {~{J 1' ri ~ ~~ . S / ~ I ¢ / .I ~ e . -. / '% . \ / .`. ~ -~: ~`~i%~ `" ~'~ ~ a J 'til .I ~.. ~ : ~ ~ ,~ Project Site ~ il-' ~- EI . ~ / ~ t ~ / ' 1._- .~" ~'•1 1. ~ -- _ =h v EI j _ "~~~ j ' ~ I ~ i ~ S{ Tank ' ~ 1~2o - , .. -~ _~`-._ _ ~._ -' :.~ { ~% it /mil .`! ~~ E~ ~ _ II ~ ,~ --~ ~ 1 , is " ~ il. _ ~ummitAvc ,t.. ig~ _-_- _, It ._-. - IE Sc6 --~ - / ---..~- -. ..' I .I~ . - --•~`UtNN212,_ ~^ w! 4;'' .- a 2. R J - ~I~is~ . _ _ 281~sos - i~ ~ - • ~ ~ _ . - ~_' 31, 'y ,, _ ~ ~ _ _ ` ; ~IE ~~ `t~_-i-~ I E ~ . ~ ~~ :n::I,. EI-• €I=co ~~ ~~-._y.. o ~" _ - _ . AE-'112/?007 SBY.R -'~- TOM C?ODSON ~: f`~SS _l~:.i: ~, i ES Wilson Avenue Extension Project Between Wardman Bullock Road and East Avenue _ $G~R ~~+' Ui'Ve\/ The listing of SBKR under the Act 'triggered the protective measures of Section 9(a) of the Act, which prohibits the Take of listed species. Take is defined in the Act irl Section 3(18) as to harass, harm, pursue, hunt, shoot, wound, kill, trap, captw-e or collect. P,dditionally, the Act i j requires Federal agencies to insure that activities they authorize, fund, or carry out are not likely to jeopardize the continued existence of any listed species, or destroy or adversely modiF,/ its critical habitat, i` any is designated. Finally, activities reo,uiring Federal involvement (such as a Section 404 permit under the Clean Water Act) that may affect an endangered species cn federal or private land roust be reviewed by the USFWS who will determine whether or not the continued existence of the listed species is jeopardized. • Shay Lawrey, a biologist permitted by ttu: IJSPWS to trap and handle SBKR (TE 0°4308-0), conducted a protocol live-trapping survey nn thle subject property between April 13 and April 1B, 200%. I he purpose of this survey was to determine the presence or absence of SBKP, within the project site, evaluate their relative abundance and breeding status, and to Inap the location cfi captured SBKR. SBKR are known to occur in the near vicinity of the study site. The result of the sl.arv~~y was that no SBKP. individuals were captured. The trapping results show that SBKR do not currenrly occupy the site and therefore, will not be affected by the road e>aension project. AE-~ ~ 212 W7 BBY.R _g_ TO~fi DODSOA! -. L:SSOC!r~,T~S Wilson Avenue Extension Project • Between Wardman Bullock Road and East Avenue SBKR Survey BAG~GR©Cli~~? I('~FORNlATIC3P4 Alluvial fan sage scrub (Riversidian): AFSS is a distinct habitat type of the coastal sage scrub community. It is composed of species found in both coastal sage scrub and chaparral communities. In general, alluvial fans are gently sloping masses of loose Pock, gravel arld sand deposited by a stream or river as it flows into a valley or upon a floodplain. This is a relatively open vegetation type adapted to periodic disturbances, such as flooding and erosion. AFSS is composed of an assortment of drought deciduous shrubs and larger evergreen woody shrubs, characteristic of both coastal sage scrub and chaparral communities. Areas vihere there are historical braided channels containing soils deposited by alluvial or wind driver) processes, typically support both alluvial sage scrub and chaparral vegetation (Smith, 1980). Three phases of AFSS have been described; pioneer, intermediate, and mature. The phases are thought to correspond to the factors such as flood scour, distance from flood channel, time since last flood, and substrate features. Nonrlally, floodwaters periodically break out of the main I river channel in a complex pattern, resulting in a braided appearance to the floodplain and resulting in a mosaic of vegetation stages. The pioneer stage is the earliest phase is generally sparse as it occurs within active channels and is therefore, subject to frequent hydrological I disturbances. The intermediate phase is typically found on higher benches between active channel (pioneer phase) and mature floodplain terraces and is subject to less frequent periodic flooding. The vegetation of both the pioneer and intermediate phases is relatively open. The • oldest or mature phase of alluvial sage scrub is rarely affected by flooding and supports the highest plant density. Common plants found within all three phases of AFSS are scalebroom, California buckwheat, wooly Yerba santa, mulefat, prickly pear, cholla, chamise, white sage, annual forties, and native and non-native grasses. • San Bernardino kangaroo rat: There are 19 subspecies of PAerriam's k-rat (Dipodomys merriami), three of which occur in California, including the SBKR. Of the three California subspecies, SBKR are the smallest and darkest. They have deep fur-lined pouches, smaller front feet, large hind legs, and a tufted tail longer than the head and body. It is the only species of kangaroo rat with four toes on its hind feet. The body color is huffy yellow with a heavy over wash of dusky brown. SBKR are nocturnal mammals and can be active during any hour of the night. SBKR, like other kangaroo rats, are highly adapted to live in hot and sometimes waterless deserts and valleys. They are solitary animals with home ranges covering up to 4 acres (Blair, 1943). Merriam's kangaroo rats are wide spread throughout the arid regions of the western United States and northwest Mexico (Hall 1981; Williams et al., 1993a). Within this distribution, the historical range of SBKR is thought to have encompassed an area of approximately 326,467 acres. Today, SBKR is known to occupy approximately 3,247 acres (McKernan, 1997). Of the six primary, recently, occupied locations in the San Bernardino and San Jacinto Valleys, only three sites (Santa Ana River and its tributaries, Cajon and Lytle Creeks, and San Jacinto and Bautista Creeks) support robust, sustaining populations of SBKR and large contiguous patches of occupied habitat. SBKR are found primarily on well drained, sandy loam substrates, characteristic of alluvial fan and floodplains, where they are able to dig simple, shallow burrows (MEC Analytical Systems, 2000). AL1122007 SBKR -7- t OB4 f.YUU50N Fn 1~,BSOCIAI-._S 1 • • Wilson Avenue Extension Project Between Wardman Bullock Road and East Avenue SBKP. In recent years, much of the habitat associated with SBKR has been severely diminished and fragmented by an ever-increasing pace of residential, commercial, and industrial development in the San Bernardino and San Jzcinto Valleys. A majority of the habitat, historically and recently occupied by SBKR, has either been lost altogether, or reduced and degraded. The USFVVS emergency listed the SBKR en January 27, 1998 and subsequently listed them as federally endangered Inter that same year on September 24, 1998 (63 FR 3837) under the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (8;; FR 3877), as amended. The USFWS also designated critical habitat units for the SB~;R orl April 23, 2002 (67 FR 19811). The units included reachlcs of the Santa F,nt:, Lytle and Cajon aeel<s, San Jacinto River and Bautista creek, and thz Eliwanda alluvial fan (65 Fh. 77178). The critica! habitat identifies specific areas, both occupied and unoccupied, that contain components essential to foraging, reproducing, recruitment of offspring, comrrlunir..ation, di::>persal, shelter, and genetic e;cchange. The critical habitat designated for SB!'R is approximately 33,295 acres in San Bernardino and Riverside counties. McKernan and others postulate that SBKR prefer the more open areas seen in pioneer type alluvium, as higher densities of SBKR Dave been found in these conditions. It is further asserted that SBKR also occupy both intermediate and mature RAFSS, but in much louder densities. It has been commonly thought chat SBKR either do not occupy or rarely occupy areas with vegetative cover over 60% or areas dominated by non-native vegetation. This thought however has been tested in recent years, as this species has been found, in high densities, to occupy areas that would appear unsuitable, such as fallow orange groves and disturbed flabi~i dominated by ruderal vegetation (Trapping data by Lawrey, 2002 and f~.4BA, 2008). AF-11 V2007 snl<a '~'- T6!V LtOD^ON a ~\°50C:(F.T.S Wilson Avenue Extension Project • Between Wardman Bullock Road and East Avenue SBF(R Survey METHODOLOGY Bacl<yround information was gathered prior to visiting This site to determine vrhich sensitive species would be expected in this area. The California Natural Diversity Data Base (CNDDB) and literature references were examined to obtain information on species occurrences ir. the project vicinity. The CNDDB search was conducted for the USGS -Cucamonga Peas; Quadrangle, 7.5 Minute Series Topographic. Based on the site conditions, data from recent S514R surveys in the near vicinity, San Bernardino Ccunty IUluseum data, and past correspondences with the San Bernardino County Flood Control District and USFWS, SBKR are determined to have a high potential of occurring within the project area. Shay Lawrey, a biologist permitted by the USFWS to trap and handle SBKR (TE 094308-U), conducted a protocol live-trapping survey along the proposed road alignment from April 13 through April 18, 2007. One hundred (100) 12-inch, Sherman live traps were placed, ire locations with the highest habitat suitability for SBKR. Two trap lines were set in a 2 X 50 cor~iguration with each trap placed 10 meters apart. For trap line locations see Figure 3. The trap lines traversed sandy bare ground, highly disturbed P.AFSS, non native ruderal habitat and semi-riverine habitat. Using SBKR trapping protocols issued by the USFUVS, traps were set at dusk, baited with rolled oats, and inspected at midnight and again at pre-davdn the following morning. All animals were identified, sexed and released unharmed a_ the point of capture. Daily notes included vaeather conditions such as tamperatw~e, wind speed, and cloud cover. • • Ae-~tzizoo~rssKrt -~' 6bA%. ^ODSOh! 8; /1SSOCI4TFS i • i 1 • l i Wilson Avenue Extension Project Between Wardman Bullocl: Road SBKR Su FIGURE 4. Ff:P.PLINF_ LC1C/a"fl0(dS / l~ 'i { ~, II - r-~ ~ I ;, " -.~` f ~. ~ ,. , r' , ~,:~ ,. ,~~~.. .~ s , ~ , ---;;. Cam-:- ~~-~ ~,- lam- ;~ _~~'' ;~ , ,, ~ ''~ -" -"-- '~-' 1 j ~.~ ~ _ STUDY AREA ~ 'i-RAPL!PIE LOCATIONS -}~Y'~ ; I -~, ~ /; 4~ -` ... I ~~ j' II ' f~ : I ~ ~ w~. tl r~~~ 'a~~- .. __. _'- iii /~ ~/~ ~~4innnumiuu~u i~ __ /may 11`` I `-y f l / // F L`~ f ~ / ~ ummit Ave j Ic i~ , ~~ ~ _' }~ ®~ ~ ~~~ fl~~il~ ~- G C"? I~SOS ~% it I ~"~ ' ~ /%' n _ AE-912/200% 581(R -~ ~~-~ f Un~ E}ODSUh Lc F.SSOCIFSES Wilson Avenue Extension Project Between lNardman Bullock Road and East Avenue SFSIER IVo SBKR were caught during the five-night trapping session. Throughout the survey site, there were various shall mammal signs. The rodent species trapped were composed of typical species found within AFSS habitat. Species richness consisted of five species which were captured in relatively low abundance per night. Trapping success ranged over the Five nights from approximately 13% to 30%. PJo animals were marked and many of the r..aptl!res could be considered recaptures. Therefore, the number of trap rights a particular species was captured was used to reflect relative abundance (Table 1). Table 9 SMALL MAMAItI!.L RODENT SPECIES TRAPPED 4V1TI-0F; Wl!_SOtt C.VENUE PROJECT STUDY SiTF_ (Between Wardman Bullock Road and east Avenue, City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County, California) • Species l'rap Nighfs San Diego pocket mouse (Chaetipus fallax fallax) 72 Little pocket mouse (Perognathus longimembris) 25 cactus mouse (Peromyscus eremicus) 86 deer mouse (Peromyscus maniculatus) "107 '~., Desert wood rat (Neotana lepida) - _ 10 j Gvernight temperahues ranged between 60°F and 65°F (degrees Fahrenheit). Cloud cover was minimal and a light breeze blew during most of the trap session. The primary plani communities found within the study site include Highly disturbed RAFSS, and ruderal pen native grassland (Appendix A). The soils and substrate range size from silt to large cobbles and are composed of sandy loam. The substrate onsite is moderately stabilized and appears conducive for SBKR burrow construction and maintenance. ne-nvzom salsa -1 ~- hOF,9 E?ODSOD; & ~^,SSOCL':TES Wilson Avenue Extension Project • Between Wardman Bullock Road and East Avenue SBKR Survey FIGURE 5a. StTE PHOTOS I L~ i I I I :, l FE-112/2007 SBKR 1~' TOIL DODSOtJ 8: ASSOCIATES 2. Non-native vegetation 1. Looking east 4. Degraded conditions. 3. Riversidean alluvial fan sage scrub 6. South of the Etiwanda debris basin. 5. Looking west. Wilson Avenue Extension Project • Eetween Wardman Bullock Road and East Avenue SBFCP. Sun~ey C~OP~9G~lVSIOf~fS !rl the recent pasi, the upper alluvial fans of the Cucamonga Creek, Day Creek, Deer Creeic and Etiwanda Creek floodplains supported breeding populations of SBKR. During this study no SBKR were captured. The trapping results show that SB14R do not occupy it~e site. Elevation and hat;iiat type may bz limiting factors rzlative to SBKf-: and as such, there very lo~,v pctential for nearby populations of SEKR to colonizz this site. However, little pocket mouse, and San Diego pockei mouse (California species of special concern) were found on the project site, but at this time there are no special permit requirements for imparts to these species. • • nr-iizrznmsanR -~-~' Tom DODiON ": E~>SSUCIJ;TES Wilson Avenue Extension Project • Between Wardman Bullock Road and East Avenue $Bt"iR uUNe~ LITERATl~PE CiTE~? Blair, W.F. 1943. Populations of the deer mouse and associated small mammals in the mesquite association of southern New Mexico. Contributions to the Laboratory of Vertebrate biology, University of Michigan 21:1-40. Hall, E.R. 1981. The Mammals of North America. Second Edition. Volumes I and I1. John Wifay ~. Sons, New York. Holland, R.F. 1986. Preliminary descriptions of the terrestrial natural communities cf California. Unpublished report by the IVongame Heritage Program of the California Department of Fish and Game, Sacramento, California, October 1986. Hickman, J.C. Editor. 1993. The Jepson Manual: higher plants of California. University of California Press, Berkeley. 1400 pp. Jones, W.T. 1993. The social system of heteromyid rodents. Pp 575-595 in: Biology of the j Heterornyidae. H.H. Genoways anal J. H. Brown (eds.). Special Publication No. 10, the American Society of Ivlammalogists; August 20, 1993. Lawrey, S. E. 1999, 2000 and 2001. Unpublished San Bernardino Kangaroo rat (SBKR) protocol ~ trapping and vegetation/soil data for various sites within the Santa Ana River, and Cajon and Lytle Creeks. Information gathered for the San Bernardino County Flood Control District and for the MSHCP. Subrnitted to Robert L. McKernan, San Bernardino County Museum of Natural Flistory. McKernan, R.L. 1997. The stan.is and known distribution of the San Bernardino Kangaroo rat (Dipodo,~nys merriami pa;vus): field surveys conducted between 1987 and 1996. Unpublished ~ report prepared for the Carlsbad Fish and Wildlife Office, Carlsbad, California. MEC Analytical Systems. 2000. Final Biological Assessment, Seven Uaks Dam, Santa Ana P.iver j Mainstem Project, San Bernardino County, California. Prepared for the LLS. Army Corps of Engineers, Los Angeles District, Los Angeles, California. Smith, R.L. 1980. Alluvial scrub vegetation in the San Gabriel River floodplain, California. Madrono 27(3):126-138. i Williams, W.F., H.H. Genoways, and J.K. Braun. 1993a. Taxonomy. Pp 38-196 in: Biology of the I Heterornyidae. H.H. Genoways and J. H. Brown (eds.). Special Publication No. 10, the American Society of Mammalogists; August 20, 1993. AE-112/20075BKR -14 Tows G\I~J~~t tni, r°-~.SSQCIATES .i • Wilson Avenue Extension Project Between Wardman Bullock Road and East Avenue $gv\R $ ~ff~~~llR~fi~. ~ r~~~~.~~~~kk~~. ~~~~~~~~~~ AE-112/2007 SaKFt l OIN C?OPSOId Pc ~LS :):: ~:1 t'= ' Wllson Avenue Extension Project Between Wardman Bullock Road and East Avenue SBKR S!.trve~r • l - - Scienfific Name Common Name Asc/epics ascicularis narrow leaf milkweed Artemisia californica California sagebrush Centaurea melitensis slarthistle Cirsium vulgare bull thistle Erigeron foliosus fleabane daisy Gnaphalium californicum e~~erlasting Gufierrezia californica California matchweed Helianthus anuus common sunflower Flemizonia paniadata tarplani Lactuca serriola pricldy lettuce Lessingia filagini/olia California aster ~ Cryptantba interrnedia popcorn flower ~ Hirschfeldia incana grey mustard r Calystegia macrostegia morning-glory Lotus scoparius deerweed Lupinus sp. ~ lupine i Centaurium venustum canchalaoua Phacelia ramosissima branching phacelia Salvia apiana white saye t Salvia mellifera black sage I Epilobium ciliatum ~ fire weed Avena 6arbata slender wild oafs Bromus sp. brome grass Cynodon dactylon Bermuda grass • Flordeum murinum barley Melica imperfecta onion grass Polypogon monspeliensis annual beard grass Eriastrum confertiflorzrm Eriogonum fasciculatum California buckwheat Galium angustifolium bedstraw I I • - tie-t72noo7 SeKR I CAR DODSON Zi: r::~$OClkl ES' Wilson Avenue Extension Project • Befvaeen Wardman Bullock Road and East Avenue SBKR Survey ~~'C~~Et9hJB~ ~~~~~V~:~ Er°~~,~~~/~8 ~6~~" !.E-1722007 SBKR TORS UODJOR F:l4ft5OCI,Ai ES Wilson Avenue Extension Project • Between Wardman Bullock Road and East Avenue SBKR Survey Girds ~ Genus Species Subspecies Common Charadrius valisineria Killdeer Columba livia Rock Dove (Domestic Pigeon) zenaida macroura Mourning Dove Sayornis nigdcans Black Phoebe Corvus corax Common Raven Fsalfriparus minimus Bushtit 7hryornanes bewickii BewiclisWren 1/imulus polyglotfos Northern Mockingbird Sturnus vulgaris European Starling Pipilo crissalis California Towhee Spizella breweri Brewer's Sparrow ti0elospiza melodic Song Sparrow Adelospiza 1,•'ncolnii Lincoln's Sparrow Carpodacus mexicanus House Finch Carduelis psaltria Lesser Goldfinch Falser dcmesticus House Sparrow /drrlphibians and Reptiles ------ _ __ _ Genus Species Subspecies _ Common i Aspidocelis Cnemidophorus occidentalis tigris Western fence lizard Western whiptail I I ' Mammals Genus Species Subspecies Common Lepus Spermophilus Canis californicus beecheyi latrans black-tailed rabbit Western ground squirrel coyote f • i AE-11212007 SRKR I ~lYl DDD$OIJ Zt. A$S~CLQ i E$ Appendix B HistoricaUArcheological Resources Survey Report n u HISTORICAL/ARCHAEOLOGICAI. RESOURCES SURVE'I' REPORT ~/@TI~S~N .~ V~1'Ji.J~ ~I~~'ItOVEM~I~T'~' ~~~~~~~~' City of Rancho Cucamonga San Fernardina County, California Eor Subrruttal to: City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Prepared for: Shay T awrey Tom Dodson and Associates 2150 N. Arrowhead Avenue San Bernardino, CA 92405 Prepared by: CRM TECH 1016 E. Cooley Drive, Suite A/B Colton, CA 92324 Bai "Tom" Tang, Principal Investigator Michael Hogan, Principal Investigator July 11, 2007 CRM TECH Contract No. 2073 NATIONAL ARCHAEOLOGICAL DATABASE INFORMATIOItT Author(s): Deirdre Encarnacion, Archaeologist/Report Writer Daniel Ballester, P.rchaeologist/Field Director Consulting Firm: CRM TECH 1016 E. Cooley Drive, Suite A/B Colton, CA 92324 (909)824-6400 Date: July 11, 2007 Title: Historical/Archaeological Resources Survey Report: Wilson Avenue Improvement Project, City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County, California For Submittal to: City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909)477-2700 Prepared for: Shay Lawrey Tom Dodson and Associates 2150 N. Arrowhead Avenue San Bernardino, CA 92405 (909) 882-3612 USGS Quadrangle: Cucamonga Peal; and Devore, Calif., 7.5' quadrangles (Sections 21; 22, 27, and 28, T11V R6W, San Bernardino Base Meridian) Project Size: Approximately 36.4 acres Keywords: Rancho Cucamonga/Etiwanda area, San Bernardino County; historical/archaeological resources survey; Site CA-SBR-9584H and Pending Sites P1081-1H (Locus East) and -15H; abandoned agricultural complex; refuse scatter; rock piles; no "historical resources" encountered in the project area MANAGEMENT SUMMARY Between May and July, 2007, at the request of Tom Dodson and Associates, CRM TECH performed a cultural resources study on the area designated for the proposed Wilson Avenue Improvement Project on the northern edge of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County, California. The project route extends along the existing right-of-way of Wilson Avenue, currently a dirt road, between Wardman Bullock Road and East Avenue, in Sections 21, 22, 27, and 28 of T1N R6W, San Bernardino Base Meridian. The project area measures approximately one mile in length and 300 feet in width. '~ The study is part of the environmental review process for. the proposed r paving and widening of this segment of Wilson Avenue. The City of Rancho Cucamonga, as Lead Agency for the project, required the study in compliance with the Califonua Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The purpose of the study is to provide the City with the necessary information and analysis to determine whether the proposed project would cause substantial adverse changes to any historical/ \archaeologica] resources that may exist in or around the projeci area, as mandated Uy CEQA. In order to identify and evaluate such resources, CP.NI TECH initiated ahistorical/archaeological j resources records search, pursued historical background research, contacted Native American representatives, and carried out an intensive-level field • survey. The results of these research procedures indicate that two historic-period sites and a portion of a third site were previously identified partially within or in close proximity to the project area. The first two sites, CP. SBR-9584H and P1081-15H, were recorded as an abandoned agricultural complex and a group of rock piles, respectively. The third site, P1081-1H, consisted of three discontiguous loci that might represent the remnants of an early 1880s hydroelectric plant built by prominent local developer George Chaffey. The locus that was found partially within the current project area, designated Locus East, was described as a sparse scatter of refuse items. During the present study, no archaeological features or artifacts associated with the three previously identified sites were observed within or adjacent to the project boundaries, suggesting that these sites have likely been removed since their recordaton in the.1990s. No other historical/archaeological resources were encountered during the course of the study. Based on the research results summarized above, CRM TECH recommends to the City of Rancho Cucamonga a finding that the proposed project will have No Impact on any known "historical resources," as defined by CEQA. No further cultural resources investigation is recommended for the project unless construction plans undergo such changes as to include areas not covered by this study. However, if buried cultural materials are encountered during any • earth-moving operations associated with the project, all work in that area should be halted or diverted until a qualified archaeologist can evaluate the nature and significance of the finds. TABLE OF CONTENTS k ~, o- I! • MANAGEMENT SUMMARY .................................................................................... .................. i INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................ ................. 1 SETTING ....................................................................................................................... ................. 3 Current Natural Setting ........................................................................................... ................. 3 Cultural Setting ........................................................................................................ ................. 3 Etlulolustorical Context ....................................................................................... ................. 3 Historical Context ................................................................................................. ................. 4 RESEARCH METHODS .............................................................................................. ................. 5 Records Search .......................................................................................................... ................. 5 Historical Research ................................................................................................... ................. 5 Native American Participation ............................................................................... ................. 5 Field Survey .............................................................................................................. ................. 5 RESULTS AND FINDINGS ......................................................................................... ................. 6 Records Search .......................................................................................................... ................. 6 Historical Research ................................................................................................... ................. 8 Native American Participatior~ ............................................................................... ................. 9 Field Survey .............................................................................................................. ................10 DISCUSSION ................................................................................................................ ................10 CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS ........................................................ ................11 REFERENCES ............................................................................................................... ................12 APPENDIX 1: Personnel Qualifications ..................................................................... ................13 APPENDIX 2: Correspondence with Native American Representatives ................ ................17 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1. Project vicinity ............................................................................................................ Figure 2. Project area .................................................................................................................. Figure 3. Overview of the current natural setting of the project area ................................... Figure 4. Previous cultural resources studies .......................................................................... Figure 5. The project area and vicinity in 1873-1875 ............................................................... Figure 6. The project area and vicinity in 1893-1894 ............................................................... Figure 7. The project area and vicinity in 1933-1936 ............................................................... Figure 8. The project area and vicinity in 1952-1954 ............................................................... LIST OF TABLES Table 1. Previously Recorded Cultural Resources in the Vicinity ....................................... 1 2 3 7 8 8 9 9 6 ii a k J ti .! • I E C • f INTRODUCTION Between May and July, 2007, at the request of Tom Dodson and Associates, CRM TECH performed a cultural resources study on the area designated for the proposed Wilson Avenue Improvement Project on the northern edge of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County, Califonua (Fig. 1). The project route extends along the existing right- of-way of Wilson Avenue, currently a dirt road, between Wardman Bullock Road and East Avenue, in Sections 21, 22, 27, and 28 of T1N R6W, San Bernardino Base Meridian (Fig. 2). The project area measures approximately one mile in length and 300 feet in width. The study is part of the environmental review process for the proposed paving and widening of this segment of Wilson Avenue. The City of Rancho Cucamonga, as Lead Agency for the project, required the study in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA; PRC §21000, et seq.). The purpose of the study is to provide the City widz the necessary information and analysis to determine whether the proposed project would cause substantia] adverse changes to any historical/ archaeological resources that may exist in or around the project area, as mandated by CEQA. In order to identify and evaluate such resources, CRM TECH initiated ahistorical/archaeological resources records search, pursued historical background research, contacted Native American representatives, and carried out an intensive-level field survey. The following report is a complete account of the methods, results, and final conclusion of the study. Figure 1. Project vicinity. (Based on USGS San Bernardino, Calif., 1:250,000 quadrangle [USGS 1969)) ,~. . ~. ~' -~ - V' ucamongaP ak OUad De ore OUatl / /~i (\ ~ i /_ ' - ~ ~ I 18Gt ~, ,:~/ I ~ ~ ~ ~ '1 i ;. a .\ ~~ ~ ___ _ _ _ J' " / ` I.1.1 ~ i .. I) // / / I II ` j/ ---- -- i>:5~,. ~ ,- Project ;Z ' 2~~ =~--` I; - ~,<...~ zl o - ,~`~ ~ ';~; - cy.``, area ~, ;, (~~i; , / > r a 1~p.., ~' ~ n i f iI ~1, ~ ~ ~ ~I _ \, i ~ I ~ f ..~ .' G ~ ~ l." ~ ' 20 /~ ' ~ i t~ _ ~ .._ C', ~. I i r I _ - i ~ ~ i .Summll A~nnuc I!_ _-d .. O- _ . ~~~le e olxx~l P~. l~. •_. SVh MIi _ i __a:~ -~_'Ge .mob I 2I I ~ -_I _ .~• - -- m...., i '~ ~...'.' ' - .. ... ~ I .-- .. ~ RI _ ~ _- ?~ 3 ~ -' .. W ~ 13 I \~ ' _ , ~. ~ ~_ ~ .. . is to J ~ i:.. ~>. ,` y.- __.~' \ I. J~ ~ .. c ; ~:.ec -. ~- // ~~ SCALE 7;24,000 ~~~ ~~ -~ - •,I`'. 0 V2 1 mile ~ ~.. ~I ~l, ~~ !, :.: , ~oo0 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 feet ~ ' ~~ Figure 2. Project area. (Based on USGS Devore and Cucamonga Peak, Calif., 1:24,000 quadrangles [USGS 1988;1996]) 2 SETTING The project area is situated on the northern edge of the San Bernardino Valley, a broad inland valley defined by the San Gabriel and San Bernardino mountain ranges on the north and a series of low rocky hills on the south. It is surrounded predominantly by undeveloped land and a series of retention basins on the East Etiwanda Creek, with densely populated residential neighborhoods of recent vintage lying farther to the east and the west. The terrain is relatively level, with a slight incline to the northv,~est and elevations ranging between approximately 1,550 and 1,640 feet above mean sea level. Soils along the project route consist of coarse brown alluvial sands with large rocks, small boulders, and gravel (Fig. 3). I'orfions of the project area have been paved to provide truck access from East Avenue to the flood-control facilities, where two large earthen levees have been constructed. A large bench has been excavated along the north side of the existing Wilson ?.venue right-of-way, apparently also for flood-control purposes. Vegetation observed along the project route includes castor bean, foxtails, wild mustard, buckwheat, Indian tobacco, sunflowers, and small grasses and shrubs. CULTURAL SETTING Ethnohistorical Context Historically, the project area was on the outskirts of the town of Etiwanda, which is now a part of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The city is named after a large Mexican land grant in the vicinity, which in turn was named after the Indian village of KaJcamo (Kroeber 1925:p1. 57) or Kuukamonga (McCawley 1996:50). The village once stood toward the eastern extent of the traditional territory of the Gabrielino, a Takic-speaking people who were considered the most populous and most powerful ethnic group in aboriginal southern 3 I CURRENT NATURAL SETTING Figure 3. Overview of the current natural setting of the project area. (Photo taken on May 24, 2007; view of the west along the existing dirt road) Ir j ~! i l a California (Bean and Smith 1978:538). Their tribal territory reached from San Clemente Island to the present-day San Bernardino-Riverside area and south into southern Orange County, but their influence spread as far as the San Joaquin Valley, the Colorado River, and Baja California. Unfortunately, most Gabrielino cultural practices had declined long before systematic etlulographic studies were instituted. As a result, knowledge about them and their lifeways is meager. Today, the leading ethnographic sources on Gabrielino culhire j, are Bean and Smith (1978) and McCawley (1996). According to the archaeological record, the Gabrielino were not the first inhabitants of the Los Angeles Basin, but arrived around 500 B.C., slowly replacing the indigenous Hokan speakers. As early as 1542, the Gabrielino were in contact with the Spanish during the 1-ustoric expedition of Juan Rodriguez Cabrillo. But it was not until 1769 that the Spaniards took steps to coloiuze Gabrielino territory. Shortly afterwards, most of the Gabrielino people were incorporated into Mission San Gabriel and other missions in southern California. Due to introduced diseases, dietary deficiencies, and forceful reduction, Gabrielino population dwindled rapidly. By 1900, they had almost ceased to exist as a culturally idenfifiable group (Bean and Smith 1978:540). In recent decades, however, there has been a renaissance of Native American activism and cultural revitalization among a number of groups of Gabrielino descendants. Historical Context For the bulk of the Spanish-Mexican period, the entire San Bernardino Valley, including the Rancho Cucamonga area, was considered a part of the land holdings of Mission San Gabriel. h~ the 1830s-1840s, during secularization of dle mission system, the Mexican authorities in Alta California made a number of large land grants on former mission properties in the valley. Among them was Rancho Cucamonga, granted to Tiburcio Tapia in 1839. The project area, however, was not involved in any of these grants, and remained public land when California was annexed by the United States in 1848. In 1881, as a phenomenal land boom swept through southern California, George Chaffey, a Canadian-born engineer, created around the project area the agricultural colony of Etiwanda, named after an Indian chief of the Great Lakes area. It was in the development of Etiwanda that Chaffey first put into practice his influential concept of a "mutual water company," with equitable water rights affixed to each parcel of land. Between. 1881 and 1883, two other colonies, Hermosa and the Iowa Tract, were established in the western portion of the city. In 1887, the two colonies merged under the name of Ioamosa, which was later changed to Alta Loma in 1913. Due to its favorable climate, the western San Bernardino Valley soon became known for the cultivation of citrus fruits, olives, and grapes. The vineyards and the wineries, in particular, figured prominently in the region's social and economic identity. During World War II, the Kaiser Steel Mill was established in the neighboring town of Fontana, which brought about significant changes in the region's agrarian landscape. In more recent years, however, residential and commercial development has been the driving force behind the rapid urban expansion of the western San Bernardino Valley. In 1977, the formerly separate towns of Etiwanda, Cucamonga, and Alta Loma united to incorporate as the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Since then, Rancho Cucamonga has continued to be one of the fastest growing cities in the h~land Empire. d. RESEARCH METHODS A' RECORDS SEARCH The Archaeological Information Center (AIC) at the San Bernardino County Museum, Redlands, provided the records search service for this study. The AIC is the official cultural resource records repository for San Bernardino County, and a part of the California Historical Resource Information System, established and maintained under the auspices of the Office of Historic Preservation. During the records search, Robin Laska, AIC Assistant Coordinator, checked the Center's electronic database for previously identified historical/archaeological resources in or near the project area, and existing cultural resources reports pertaining to the vicinity. Previously identified historical/archaeological resources include properties designated as California Historical Landmarks, Points of Historical Interest, or San Bernardino County Historical Landmarks, as well as those listed in the National Register of Historic Places, the California Register of Historical Resources, or the California Historical Resource . Information System. HISTORICAL, RESEARCH Historical background research for this study was conducted by CRM TECH historian Bai "Tom" Tang (see App.. l for qualifications) on the basis of published literature in Local and regional history and historic maps of the Rancho Cucamonga area. Among maps consulted for this study were the U.S. General Land Office's (GLO) land swwey plat map dated 1875 and the U.S. Geological Survey's (USGS) topographic maps dated 1901-1903, 1941, and 1954. These maps are collected at the Science Library of the University of California, Riverside, and the California Desert District of the U.S. Bureau of Land Management, located in Moreno Valley. NATIVE AMERICAN PARTICIPATION As part of the research procedures, CRM TECH contacted the State of California's Native American Heritage Commission on May 21, 2007, to request a records search in the commission's sacred lands file. Following the commission's recommendations, CRM TECH further contacted a total of nine Native American representatives in the region in writing on June 7 to solicit local Native American input regarding any possible cultural resources concerns over the proposed undertaking. The correspondences between CRM TECH and the Native American representatives are attached to this report in Appendix 2. FIELD SURVEY On May 24, 2007, CRM TECH archaeologists Daniel Ballester and Thomas Melzer (see App. 1 for qualifications) carried out the intensive-level, on-foot field survey of the project area. During the survey, Ballester and Melzer walked parallel east-west transects spaced 15 meters (approx. 50 feet) apart along either side of the centerline of the project route. In this way, the ground surface in the entire project area was systematically and carefully examined for any evidence of human activities dating to the prehistoric or historic periods (i.e., 50 years ago or older). At the time of the survey, ground visibility ranged from poor 5 1 } i t • C~ (30%) to excellent (90%) depending upon the density of the vegetation. The results of the survey are discussed below. RECORDS SEARCH RESULTS AND FINDINGS According to records on file at the AIC, the project area was evidently covered by a number of previous cultural resources studies completed between 1986 and 1.998 (Fig. 4). Outside the project area but within none-mile radius, AIC records show at least 30 other previous studies on various tracts of land and linear features (Fig. 4). As a result of these and other similar shidies in the viciiuty, a total of 18 historical/archaeological sites, including five "pending" sites, one historic-period building, and one California Point of Historical. Interest, were previously identified within the scope of the records search, along with three isolates-i.e., localities with fewer than three artifacts-as listed below in Table 1. Table 1. Previously Recorded Cultural Resources within the Sco a of the Records Search Site No. Recorded by/Date Descri tion 36-004946 Lerch 1982 Rock cairns 36-006166 de Munek and Swanson 1988 Foundation with associated artifacts 36-006818 McKemla et al. 1991 Water i eline 36-006901 Sutton 1991 Summit Avenue Ditch 36-007323 Landis et a1. 1993 Trash scatter 36-007661 Cotterman et al. 2000 Foundations with trash scatter 36-009584* Gre or 1998 Formera~riculturalcom ]ex 36-010296 Cotterman et al. 2000 Trash scatter 36-010297 Cotterman et al. 2000 Retainin wall 36-013027 Sanka 2006 Orchard with associated artifacts 36-015232/ Merrill 1987 Garcia Ranch House, a California Point of Historical 36-015233 Interest(CPHI-SBr-82) 36-016420 Banks 1987 Weir boxes, ca. 1880s 36-020146 Tan 2002 Sin le-family residence, ca. 1905 36-060255 Lerch 1986 Isolate: sin le obsidian biface 36-060256 LSA Associates 1989 Isolate: three china/ceramic sherds 36-060257 Landis 1993 Isolate: one chi ed-stone flake P1081-1H*/** McKenna et al. 1991 Possible location of early hydroelectric plant; trash scatter P1081-15H°/** McKenna et al. 1991 Rock files/rockali nments P1081-16H** McKenna et al. 1991 Trash scatter P1081-19H** McKenna et al. 1991 Garcia Ranch PSBR-2H** " N/A Cucamon a-Ca'on Pass Wa on Trail ca 1840-1900+ Recorded partially wi thin or in dote nrnrim;r., r.....~ ect bo d , . ""'Pending" site. un arses. Among these, two of the sites and a portion of a third site were found parfially within or in close proximity to the project area (see Table 1), all of them recorded during the 1990s. Site 36-009584 (CA-SBR-9584H), recorded in 1998, represented an abandoned agricultural complex with such features as a reservoir and an olive grove. Site P1081-15H, recorded in 1991, was described as a group of numerous rock piles, including three definable rock alignments, of unspecified age and function. Site P1081-1H, also recorded in 1991, consisted of three discontiguous loci, two of which were considered the possible sites an ,~--- N q S~ x, • • C~ ~CUCamanga Peak Ou r i/~.~ ' li ~ ~ _ - I -- Scope of ! records `~" ~- search r*- / ~/ I ~ ~~. / i ~' ~~ 1~,~- ,1061582~I~ 1) s ~ / ,L _ _ III. - ' ~ `' ~~~ ~~:. i,. 11 _ -., _rssmi ~~ -: 1061868 ~ 21= ~ ~_~ ..: _;, ii - I ~ 1.062316 . ~ ty ~. ~~ ' I '~ ~ •. lIEUU'.~ ~'I / 1062188' ~ `. ~' ~~ . ~,.~q '` o - ~ q 97 _.. --- __.._..-.__~__ - .. I ,, 01064-469 - i ~r :~ - . ! 1065103 1065175 10.6396714~~ 1063969- ~~ ~e M 1 IIA 1063773 'ki , ,F l.•`'- ~~_/•/1D6510,4•;~M~r ~.'oGai q:'i10628 _~ 1~. ~(-.. _-_ -=_: ~ 1505- '- I • ~ .._..,a"065 5 28 :; _ - ~ - I 106 455 o~~ 1060340% " _ rt; ~`~;~. 1 . ,~ :.,...' n~ ••w ; - :. .,, __ > .....: ~.....- ¢f _.i - lau_'_~- -_- "a~_ •,Nr j~ i _ _ -. I-ne..l: - _ Ali Sl2nc:'~ .~~ .. __.-_. .. ~ a 161 ouatl ~ (~ t 1.-, t /1\. l~ II )~ `. f:. ~/ I?..1~ .. \r ~ ~~ ^~ s -J _ `~ 1 I feet ~ ` NCI ~;.~ ..;"j x1'061459; -' ,~~: " " i~- _. ~~-_1062039;- .-~_ -_IW~ 1062240\~ ~: 1062241,) ~ ~,, 1062547 - --'1062621 ~1061I582u~1 / ~ " 10§~~~55 ~" \ .i, . it o° .fib 4 ~ , 1 3'~ ~, 'Q i -: M i ~ ` ~ i -_ . , ?I xi3i x ~ ~i " '~ 106 4 l 2851^l . I~ 1 I1 ~'. ~ r r 12fR --" - 1061 i\ 1 63456 Q ~~„ __. -__. 1 1 Project area r _ ~ Areas previously surveyed Linear surveys SCALE 1:24,000 1000 0 1000 2000 feet 34.. Figure 4. Previous cultural resources studies in the vicinity of the project area, listed by AIC file number. Locations of historical/archaeological sites are not shownas a protective measure. 7 ~~ . r: R 'f r1 early 1880s hydroelectric plant built by George Chaffey, the first of its kind in California and perhaps the United States. The locus found partially in the current project area, designated Locus East, was recorded as a sparse scatter of refuse items such as glass, ceramics and wood (mostly modern) with no structural remains, which "may also be associated with hydro-electric plant, but unlikely" (McKenna 1991). None of the other previously recorded resources was located in the immediate vicinity of the project area, and thus none of them requires further consideration during this study. HISTORICP.L RESEARCH Historic maps consulted for this study indicate that the project vicinity demonstrated ample evidence of settlement and development activities at least by the 1870s, when several settlers' houses and cultivated agricultural fields were noted nearby, along with a web of roads (Fig. 5). Two of the roads, including one that extended from Cucamonga to the Cajon Pass, crossed the project area near its eastern end (Fig. 5). Two decades later, more Luildings, most of them presumably farmsteads, had appeared in the vicinity (Fig. 6). One of them was located on the northwestern edge of the project area, the first to be found within or adjacent to the project boundaries (Fig. 6). By the mid-1930s, the building in the project area was no longer present (Fig. 7). Instead, a segment of Wilson Avenue had appeared and became the most notable man-made feature in the project area (Fig. 7). Within the next 20 years, Wilson Avenue was extended across the entire project area as an unpaved dirt road, but no buildings or any other major features of built environment were observed within the project boundaries in 1952-1954 (Fig. 8). - .~ .. i o!' ~: ° ° ~ d ~ ' "' - ~. ~ I / ~ 'v . ~ Project m se„ , s~ tiz ~ are a ,~ G zU Y `v'. ~ P~. ~' `~ t0 . C'' ~~ ~'~ S 7 µ. ~' n~ri,y'~ ~ ~ 4 - r ~ J y 0 2000 4000 feet ~ ~' '' ~ ~" 'tp5 S. n'9 V 9'W, ~, pp ~ ~ ya m L ~ ~ . . f °m fi , r "" - - ~ Projec ~ t ~' . ; - - ;~ area : : -- . , ~ ; .. .. ~ gran ~.., / _ i - ~'p: ~~ ~,~ 1 ~ 1 J ' t ~ f^ - x , L j - ~1 ' 27 ~~' 1 i 26 M1 .,. Y ~~ `i ~ ~ ~ 'gig i~ ~_ ~~i' _ ~ ;\ \~ ; \I ~ ~ SCALE 1:62,500 { ~~ o 35 0 7 mile yf_ „ a • Figure 5. The project area and vicinity in 1873-1875. Figure 6. The project area and vicinity in 1893-1894. (Source: GLO 1875) (Source: USGS 1901;1903) ~'. !4 v '/;' y i ~ ~ Gue:}, and Vlclnlty quad. Derom GUatl. 7 ~~~ Project - ~'~ r ~~, area f~%''. ,e ~ l ~,/~ /- .lam' ~- , . I /„ ~i% ~ / ~l f / / l~ ~ ling ~ ~ n/ ,~ // / '- _,~~ , ~~ , f Ya~fa ~~ ~ ~ :/ / ~.. _~_ -'n ~_ -i ii"~ N FtL1 SCALE 1:31,680 0 2500 feet ~'}.~ ~jp ~~ Figure 7. The project area and vicinity in 1933-1936. (Source: USGS 1941a;1941b) NATIVE AMERICAN PARTICIPATION l ~ a I 1 ~ Gntado Guad. an BemeAlrw Guad ' i J i7 Y (~In ~; 1\~ Ye I ~ } ~ .' w '1 aai ` pl n~a ~ ~ { i ±i t t s r Project,` i ~-~''` area `a: ; :.` iii" p._,.,...,a . ~~ 21'".Si 4 _ .. ~~:.. 2 ~r::: ~.~. .^ico ~ 23 ~, 1 ~ o ~. d \ s~ ~~ m ..e....~..., 6)6 ~... i I ~- Jalo' ~e z a ~! i ~ ' ~ia X27 '6 MT - a '~ l.. ~ k~ Y 6~ O.. ~~ x: ,o ~ ;: w ei( .. 1 i 1 6.:...: -~ 1 JJL.~, it I I ~ i SCALE 1:62,500 i ~ a~_ sd t ~ ~~ ~ 35~ 0 1 mile c f a ~ .~ ` ~~' Figure 8. The project area and vicinity in 1952-1954. (Source: USGS 1954a;1954b) In response to CRM TECH's inquiry, the Native American Heritage Commission reported that the sacred lands record search identified no Native American cultural resources in the immediate project area. However, noting that "the absence of specific site information in the Sacred Lands File does not guarantee the absence of cultural resources in any 'area of potential effect'," the commission suggested that local Native American representatives be contacted, and provided a list of potential contacts in the region (see App. 2). Upon receiving the Native American Heritage Commission's response, CRM TECH contacted all eight individuals on the list and the organizations they represent. In addition, John Gomez, Jr., Cultural Resources Coordinator for the Ramona Band of Cahuilla Indians, was also contacted at the recommendation of tribal vice chairman Joseph Hamilton. As of this time, one written response has been received. Britt Wilson, Cultural Resources Coordinator for the Morongo Band of Mission Indians, replied by e-mail on June 11, 2007. In the e-mail, he states that the tribe has no specific knowledge of cultural resources in the project area, but recommends archaeological monitoring during earth-moving operations, preferably with at least one Native American monitor, if Native American cultural resources are discovered in the project area, or if the area is determined to have a medium to high sensitivity for cultural remains. In addition, Mr. Wilson requests that standard procedures concerning inadvertent discoveries of human remains and/or buried cultural deposits be followed, including avoidance of further ground disturbance until the coroner's office and/or a qualified archaeologist can be consulted as appropriate. FIELD SURVEY The intensive-level field survey produced completely negative results for potential culhnral resources. The entire project area was closely inspected for any evidence of human activities dating to the prehistoric or historic periods, but none was found. No feahtres or artifacts associated with Sites CA-SBR-9584H, P1081-1H, or P1081-15H were observed within or adjacent to the project boundaries during the survey, suggesting that the portions of the sites previously recorded in or near the project area have likely been removed since their recordation in the 1990s. Modern trash was observed over much of the project area, but none of the items was of any historical /archaeological interest. In sum, no buildings, structures, objects, sites, features, or arfacts more than 50 years of age were encountered during the field survey. DISCUSSION The purpose of this study is to identify any cultural resources within or adjacent to the project area, and to assist the City of Rancho Cucamonga in determining whether such resources meet the official definition of "historical resources," as provided in the California Public Resources Code, in particular CEQA. According to PRC §5020.1(j), "'historical resource' includes, but is not limited to, any object, building, site, area, place, record, or manuscript which is historically or archaeologically significant, or is significant in the architectural, engineering, scientific, economic, agricultural, educational, social, political, military, or cultural annals of California." More specifically, CEQA guidelines state that the term "historical resources" applies to any such resources listed in or determined to be eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources, included in a local register of historical resources, or determined to be historically significantby the Lead Agency (Title 14 CCR ~15064.5(a)(1)-(3)). Regarding the proper criteria for the evaluation of historical significance, CEQA guidelines mandate that "a resource shall be considered by the lead agency to be 'historically significant' if the resource meets the criteria for listing on the California Register of Historical Resources" (Title 14 CCR §15064.5(a)(3)). A resource maybe listed in the California Register if it meets any of the following criteria: (1) Is associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of California's history and cultural heritage. (2) Is associated with the lives of persons important in our past. (3) Embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, region, or method of construction, or represents the work of an important creative individual, or possesses Mgh artistic values. (4) Has yielded, or may be likely to yield, informafion important in prehistory or history. (PRC §5024.1(c)) As discussed above, two historic-period sites, CA-SBR-9584H and P1081-15H, and a portion of a third site, P1081-1H, were previously identified partially within or in close proximity to the project area. However, based on the type of features and artifacts reported 10 at these locations, neither of the two sites, nor Locus East of P1081-1H, appears to have held much promise for local historical value or archaeological data. Although P1081-1H may have been associated with a prominent early developer in the region and with possibly the first hydroelectric plant in California, the sparse scatter of refuse items of mixed vintage recorded at Locus East, the only portion of the site in the project vicinity, certainly does not appear to have demonstrated a strong association with either. In any event, no evidence of these three sites was found during this study, indicating that the portions of the sites previously recorded in or near the project area are no longer in existence. No other historical/archaeological resources were encountered during the course of the study. Based on these findings, and in light of the criteria listed above, the present study concludes that no )zisforical resources exist witl2in or adjacent to the project area. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS CEQA establishes that "a project that may cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource is a project that may have a significant effect on the environment" (PRC X21084.1). "Substantial adverse change," according to PRC ~5020.1(q), "means demolition, destruction, relocation, or alteration such that the significance of a historical resource would be impaired." Since no "historical resources" were encountered during the course of this study, CRM TECH presents the following recommendations to the City of Rancho Cucamonga: No historical resources exist within or adjacent to the project area, and thus the project as currently proposed will not cause a substantial adverse change to any known historical resources. No further cultural resources investigation is necessary for the proposed project unless construction plans undergo such changes as to include areas not covered by this study. If buried cultural materials are discovered during any earth-moving operations associated with the project, all work in that area should be halted or diverted until a qualified archaeologist can evaluate the nature and significance of the finds. 11 ,: ~< ~r a ~t ,.: ,. REFERENCES Bean, Lowel] John, and Charles R. Smith 1978 Gabrielino. In Robert F. Heizer (ed.): Handbook of North American Indians, Vol. 8: California; pp. 538-549. Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C. GLO (General Land Office, U.S. Department of the Interior) 1875 Plat Map: Township No. 1 North Range No. 6 West, San Bernardino Meridian; surveyed in 1873-1875. Kroeber, Alfred L. 1925 Handbook of the bldians of California. Bureau of American Ethnology Bulletin 78. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. McCawley, William 1996 The First Angelenos: The Gabrielino Indians of Los Angeles. Malki Museum Press/ Ballena Press, Baiuting/Novato, California. McKenna, Jeanette A. 1991 California Historical Resource Information System record forms, P1081-1H (Locus East). On file, Archaeological Information Center, San Bernardino County Museum, Redlands. USGS (United States Geological Survey, U.S. Department of the Interior) 1901 Map: San. Bernardino, Calif. (15', 1:62,500); surveyed in 1893-1894. 1903 Map: Cucamonga, Calif. (15', 1:62,500); surveyed in 1894. 1941a Map: Devore, Calif. (1:31,680); surveyed in 1936. 1941b Map: Guasti and Vicinity, Calif. (1:31,680), surveyed in 1933. 1954a Map: Ontario, Calif. (7.5', 1:62,500); aerial photographs taken in 1952. 1954b Map: San Bernardino, Calif. (15', 1:62,500); aerial photos taken in 1952, field- checked in 1953-1954. 1969 Map: San Bernardino, Calif. (1:250,000); 1958 edition revised. 1988 Map: Devore, Calif. (7.5', 1:24,000); 1966 edition photorevised in 1985. 1996 Map: Cucamonga Peak, Calif. (7.5', 1:24,000);1988 edition revised in 1996. 12 ~~ APPENDIX 1: PERSONNEL QUALIFICATIONS PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR/HISTORIAN Bai "Tom" Tang, M.A. Education 1988-1993 Graduate Program in Public History/Historic Preservation, UC Riverside. 1987 M.A., American History, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut. 1982 B.A., History, Northwestern University, Xi'an, China. 2000 "Introduction to Section 106 Review," presented by the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation and the University of Nevada, Reno. 1994 "Assessing the Significance of Historic Archaeological Sites," presented by the Historic Preservation Program, University of Nevada, Reno. Professional Experience 2002- Principal Investigator, CRM TECH, Riverside, California. 1993-2002 Project Historian/Architectural Historian, CRM TECH, Riverside, California. 1993-1997 Project Historian, Greenwood and Associates, Pacific Palisades, California. 1991-1993 Project Historian, Archaeological Research Unit, UC Riverside. 1990 Intern Researcher, California State Office of Historic Preservation, Sacramento. 1990-1992 Teaching Assistant, History of Modern World, UC Riverside. 1988-1993 Research Assistant, American Social History, UC Riverside. 1985-1988 Research Assistant, Modern Chinese History, Yale University. 1985-1986 Teaching Assistant, Modern Chinese History, Yale University. 1982-1985 Lecturer, History, Xi'an Foreign Languages Institute, Xi'an, China. Honors and Awards 1988-1990 University of California Graduate Fellowship, UC Riverside. 1985-1987 Yale University Fellowship, Yale University Graduate School. 1980, 1981 President's Honor List, Northwestern University, Xi'an, China. Cultural Resources Management Reports Preliminary Analyses and Recommendations Regarding California's Cultural Resources Inventory System (With Special Reference to Condition 14 of NPS 1990 Program Review Report). California State Office of Historic Preservation working paper, Sacramento, September 1990. Numerous cultural resources management reports with the Archaeological Research Unit, Greenwood and Associates, and CRM TECH, since October 1991. Membership California Preservation Foundation. 13 PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR/ARCHAEOLOGIST Michael Hogan, Ph.D., RPA* Education 1991 Ph.D., Anthropology, University of Califonua, Riverside. 1981 B.S., Anthropology, University of California, Riverside; wide honors. 1980-1981 Education Abroad Program, Lima, Peru. 2002 Section 106-National Historic Preservation Act: Federal Law at the Local Level. UCLA Extension Course #888. 2002 "Recognizing Historic Artifacts," workshop presented by Richard Norwood, Historical Archaeologist. 2002 "Wending Your Way through the Regulatory Maze," symposium presented by the Association of Environmental Professionals. 1992 "Southern California Ceramics Workshop," presented by Jerry Schaefer. 1992 "Historic Artifact Workshop," presented by Am1e Duffield-Stoll. Professional Experience 2002- Principal Investigator, CRM TECH, Riverside, California. 1999-2002 Project Archaeologist/Field Director, CRM TECH, Riverside. 1996-1998 Project Director and Etlulographer, Statistical Research, Inc., Redlands. 1992-1998 ,.1992-1995 Assistant Research P.nthropologist, University of California, Riverside Project Director Archaeolo ical Re h U it U C Ri id , g searc n , . . vers e. 1993-1994 Adjunct Professor, Riverside Community College, Mt. San Jacinto College, U.C. Riverside, Chapman University, and San Bernardino Valley College 1991-1992 . Crew Chief, Archaeological Research Unit, U. C. P~iverside. 1984-1998 Archaeological Technician, Field Director, and Project Director for various southern California cultural resources management firms. Research In terests Cultural Resource Management, Southern Californian Archaeology, Settlement and Exchange Patterns, Specialization and Stratification, Culture Change, Native American Culture, Cultural Diversity. Cultural Resources Management Reports Author and co-author of, contributor to, and principal investigator for numerous cultural resources management study reports since 1986. Memberships Register of Professional Archaeologists. Society for American Archaeology. Society for Califonua Archaeology. (°acific Coast Archaeological Society. ~oachella Valley Archaeological Society. 14 PROJECT ARCHAEOLOGIST/REPORT WRITER Deirdre Encarnacion, M.A. Education 2003 M.A., Anthropology, San Diego State University, California. 2000 B.A., Anthropology, minor in Biology, with honors; San Diego State University, California. 1993 A.A, Communications, Nassau Community College, Garden City, N.Y. 2001 Archaeological Field School, San Diego State University. 2000 Archaeological Field School, San Diego State University. Professional Experience 2004- Project Archaeologist/Report Writer, CRM TECH, Riverside, California. 2001-2003 Part-time Lecturer, San Diego State University, California. 2001 Research Assistant for Dr. Lynn Gamble, San Diego State University. 2001 Archaeological Collection Catalog, SDSU Foundation. PROJECT ARCHAEOLOGIST Thomas J. Melzer, B.A. Education 2004 B.A., Anthropology/Cultural Resources Management, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona. Experience 2004- Project Archaeologist, CRM TECH, Riverside. 2002 Archaeological Field Technician, Death Valley National Park Archaeological Site Resources Condition Assessment Project, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona, Foundation; directed by Dr. Mark W. Allen. • Survey and assessment of previously recorded sites; co-author of final report. 2001-2002 Archaeological Field Technician, Red Mountain Archaeological Project, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona; directed by Dr. Mark W. Allen. • Survey, test excavation, laboratory analysis of artifacts. 15 PROJECT ARCHAEOLOGIST/FIELD DIRECTOR Daniel Ballester, B.A. Education 1998 1997 B.A., Anthropology, California State University, San Bernardino. Archaeological Field S h l U c oo , niversity of Las Vegas and University of California, Riverside. 1994 University of Puerto Rico, Rio Piedras, Puerto Rico. 2002 "Historic Archaeology Workshop," presented by Richard Norwood, Base Archaeologist, Edwards Air Force B ase; presented at CRM TECH, Riverside. Profession al Experience 2002- Field Director, CRM TECH, Riverside. • Report writing, site record preparation, and supervisory responsibilities over all aspects of fieldwork and field crew 1999-2002 . Project Archaeologist, CRM TECH, Riverside. 1998-1999 • Survey, testing, data recovery, monitoring, and mapping. Field Crew, K.E.A. Environmental, San Diego. Two and a half months of excavations on Topomai village site, Marine Corp Air Station, Camp Pendleton • 1998 . Field Crew, A.S.M. Affiliates, Encinitas. • T k wo wee s of excavations on a site on Red Beach, Camp Pendleton, and two weeks of survey in Cam Pendlet O 1998 p on, tay Mesa, and Encinitas. Field Crew, Archaeological Research Unit, University of California Rive id , rs e. • Two weeks of survey in Anza Borrego Desert State Park and Eurek a Valley, Death Valley National Park. • 16 APPENDIX 2 CORRESPONDENCE WITH .NATIVE AMERICAN REPRESENTATIVES* * A total of nine local Native American representatives were contacted; a sample letter is included in this report. 17 • CRM TECH F A.~ C O V.E'R; SI°I~ET 4472 Orange Street Riverside, CA 92501 951.784.3051•Tel 951.784.2987•Fax To: Native American Heritage Commission Fax: (916)657-5390 From: Laura Hensley Shaker Date: May 21, 2007 Number of pages (including this cover sheet): 2 will follow by mail I I J will not follow unless requested I ---- -----------------I-------- RE: Sacred Land records search This is to request a Sacred Lands records search Dame of project: Wilson Avenue Extension CRM TECH #2073 Project Size: I linear mile Location: In the City of Rancho Cucamonga San Bernardino County USGS 7.5' quad sheet data: Cucamonga Peak, Calif. Sections 21-22, T1N R6W, SBBM Please call if you need more information or have any questions. 12esults may be faxed to the number above. I appreciate your assistance in this matter. I3AIZDCOPY.• ~ I Map included ' l15/21/~007 17: qA FA% ~Jlli 55i 5)f10 NAflC t~'j 001 t 9 ~I• E NATIVE AMERICAN HEF~ITAGE CpMMISS10N 416 CAPfrpL MALL, RDOM 96a sacRAMEN7a, CA 45nya (91¢)653-625y Fmc (916)667-5390 Weh SH9 yQyy1 n_h~~y e-m&I: ds,nartc&'pachau.net May 2'1, 2007 Ms- Laura Hensisy Shaker GRNi SLGIH 4472 Orange Street Riverside, CA 92501 Sent bY'FAX to: 951-784-2987 Numtr?r of pages-. 3 Re: Dear Ms. Nensfey Shaker: Although you did not request it for this project, the Native American Heritage Commission • was able to perform a record search of its Sacred Lands File (SLf] for the affected project area, The SLF failed to indioate the presence of Native American cultural resources in the immediate project areas; all USGS Quadrangles were searched.. Tha absence of specific site information in the Sarred Lands Fle does not guarantee the absence of cultural resources in any 'area of potential effect (APB.' For Tribal cgnsuttation with htibes near the project or that have a cultural affiliation with the project area, earty consulGntinn is the best way to avoid unantiapated nfrsundersfandings or unlikely discoveries onge a project is underway, Enclosed are the nearest tribes that may have knowledgo of cattlrral resources in the project area. A List of NativeAmedcan confa~ts are attached to assist you. The Comrrtission makes np recommendation of a srngla individual or group over another. It is advisable to contact the persons Ilsted; if they cannotsupRN You with specific information about the impact on cultural resources, they may ba able to refer you to another tribe or persgn knowledgeable ofthe cultural resources in or near the affected project area (APB. Lack of surface evidence of archeologtcai resources does not preclude the existence of archeological resources- Lead aganaes shoukl consideravoidance, as defined in Senion 15370 of the Califvmia Environmental Qualify Act (CEQA) when significant cultural resources could be affected by a projeR. Also, Public Resources Code Section 5097.98 and Health 8 Safety Code Section 7050.5 prpvideforprovisionsforacadentatry discovered archeological resourcesauring construction and mandate the processes to be followed in the event of an accidental discovery pf any human remains in a project location other Phan a 'dedicated cemetery. Discussipn ofthese should be included in your environmental documerris, as appropriate. If you have any qu lions about this response to your request, please do not hesitate to me at (91~) 6531. Native American Corrtact List ?1/?007 17:08 FA% 91O Oil 5100 NAHC ~ 00? Native American CortTacts San t3ernardino County May 21, 2007 Ana Band of Mission Indians 1h Hamilton, vim chairman Box 391674 Cahuilla , CA 92539 763-4325 Fax Gabrieleno/1'ongva Tribal Council Anthony Morales, Chairperson PO Box 693 San Gabriel CA 91778 ChfefRBwifeQaoLcom (626) 286-1632 (626) 286-1758 - Wome (62fi) 286-1262 Fax Manuel Band of Mission Indians y Duro, Chairperson 3 Community Cerrter Drive Serrano land GA 92346 864-3370 Pax Society Alvitre 2elzah Avenue Gabrielino da GA 91335 re@ ahoo.com 504y2468 Cell va Ancestral Territorial Tribal Nation Tammy Rosas, Tribal Adrninstrator Admiralty Way, Suite 7~2 Gabrielino Tongva is Del Rey CA 90292 Ib Cufrtm only 83 of ills date OT thlII tlOCU117lYIL Gabrlelino Tongva Morongo Band of Mission Indians Britt W, Wilson, Cultural Resources-Project Manager 49750 Seminole Drive Cahuilla Cabazon CA 92230 Serrano hritt_wilson @ morongo.otg (951) 755-52D6 (951) 755-52001323-D822-cell (951) 922-8146 Fax San Manuel Band of Mission Indians Ann Briel'ty, Environmantal Department 101 Pure Water Lane Serrano Highland CA 946 abrier~,@ sanmanuel-nsn.gov (909) 863-5899 EXT-4321 (909) 862-5152 Fax Serrano Band of Indians Gpldie Walker 6588 Valoria Drive Serrano Highland CA 92346 (9D9) 862-9883 nlaon Or tlels list does nol rogavo erty person df statutory roaporrelbiifty as daHned In Secilon 7p5p-5 or fire Health and Cbde, Section 5097.94 OT the Pubtlc Rpapur408 COtlO end SectlOn $097.98 Ot th0 Pubtlc Rsaourt~s Cod0. %t Is only applicable Tor Cordaeting fowl Native Amedcan Wiih regard to cutlurei reaounrea t8r tha propmxW I Avenuo Exterislon; CRM TECH 021A3; In CKy oT Ra~hp Cucamonga; San Bemprdlnp COUttty, CalitVmW for a Sacred l9ntls Ppe search 1NpE CDl1dUCIEtl. - t.'+^: ~, ,;' ;~~. k''~ i r'. r, June 7, 2007 Cindi Alvitre Ti'At Society 6602 Zelzah Ave. Reseda, CA 91335 RE: Wilson Avenue Extension In the City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County CRM TECI-I Contract #2073 Dear Ms. Alvitre: CRM TECH is conducting a cultural resources study for the project referenced above. In the meanfime, I am writing to request your input on potential Native American cultural resources in or near the project area. Please respond at your earliest convenience if you have any specific knowledge of sacred/religious sites or other sites of Native American traditional cultural value within or near the project area that we should be aware of. The lead agency for this project is the County of San Bernardino for CEQA compliance purposes. The project involves extending the segment of Wilson Avenue located just west of the I- 15 freeway, in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County, approximately one mile further west. It will start at the intersection of Wilson Avenue and Banyan Street and will end at Horse Thief Place. The accompanying map, based on the USGS Cucamonga Peak, Calif., 7.5' quadrangle, depicts the locaton of the project area along the line between Sections 21 and 28 and between Sections 22 and 27, T1N R6W, SBBM. Any information, concerns or recommendations regarding cultural resources in the vicinity of the project area may be forwarded to CRM TECH by telephone, e-mail, facsimile or standard mail. Thank you for the time and effort in addressing this important matter. Respectfully, Laura Hensley Shaker CRM TECH Encl.: Project location map Subject: Rancho Cucamonga Project, CRM TECH #2073 Date: Monday, ]une 11, 2007 4:37 PM From: Britt Wilson <britt_wilson@morongo.org> To: Laura Hensley-Shaker <laura.shaker@crmtech.us> Cc: Britt Wilson <britt_wilson@morongo.org> Conversation: Rancho Cucamonga Project, CRM TECH #2073 Thank you for contacting the Morongo Band of Mission Indians concerning cultural resource information relative to the above referenced project(s). Due to the high number of information requests the Tribe has been receiving, we are only able to respond via email. The project(s) is outside of the Tribe's current reservation boundaries but within an area that may be considered a traditional use area or one is which the Tribe has cultural ties (e.g. Cahuilla/Serrano territory). The Tribe, however, has no specific information regarding cultural resources on your site area but would like to offer the following comments/desired conditions: • If Native American cultural resources (other than isolates) are found on the project site, or the site is in a medium to high-probability area for those resources, the Tribe recommends a cultural resources survey and archaeological site monitoring -preferably utilizing at least one Native American monitor; • In accordance with state law, the County coroner should be contacted if any human remains are found during earthmoving activities; • If Native American cultural resources are uncovered during earthmoving activities, wort: in the immediate vicinity of the find shall cease and an archaeologist meeting Secretary of Interior standards shall be retained to assess the find. If the find is significant enough to require a Treatment Plan, the Morongo Band of Mission Indians asks that it be contacted again to provide further consultation. [SPECIAL NOTE (for projects other than cell towers): If this project is associated with a city or county specific plan or general plan action it is subject to the provisions of SB18-Traditional Tribal Cultural Places (law became effective January 1, 2005) and will require the city or county to participate in formal, government-to-government consultation with the Tribe. If the city or county are your client, you may wish to make them aware of this requirement. By law, they are required to contact the Tribe. This email does not constitute consultation under SB18.] Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the project. Sincerely, Britt W. Wilson Project Manager -Cultural Resources Morongo Band of Mission Indians Casino Morongo Building 49750 Seminole Drive Cabazon, CA 92230 Office: (951) 755-5200 Direct: (951) 755-5206 Mobile: (951) 323-0822 Fax: (951) 922-8146 E-mail: Britt_wilson@morongo.org Wayta' Yawa' (always believe) Appendix C Focused Botanical Survey i,~,~;~~ - ~tFcan~o~~ev~a ~e=~riz, 'i'av~wnshs~ 1 &~ic,r4€~, ~~artigu ~v, ~!'~esi, ~ccti~atys 2'9, ~2, 27, anet 2~ , a,~.P~ti. [,33.'~%.'ti-.~.:.."'~ix~..,"32':::::i:;?i'J:.-7~~'T:'i~rn'r„~'^.vT.:~:lt'r.._;.Iiogz~.r~.-~m~ ~~~f._'~':S!~v.:3?.:~:iS.~.::~..: '~" ~ D~,F3ner1~~(~psiicarau :The City of Rancho Cucaronga • Cornmunity Development Department, Engineering Division 10500 Civic Center Drive Rariclio Cucamonga, California 91730 (909)477-2740 I~rincipal Investigator: CJ Fotheringham ~'om Dodson & Associates 2150 North Arrowhead Avenue San Bernardino, California 92405 (909)882-3612 Report prepared by and field~NOrk conducted by C..1. Fotheringham Date Report Submitted: 07-25-07 • i i i • i i i ~~l`~i LJ~~ ~~ [o~f'V I ~F'~ l J L Certirication .................................... .................. 1 II. Executive Sw-nmary ............................. .................. ?_ III. Methodology ................................... .................. 3 IV. Survey Results ................................. .................. 4 V. Impacts and Recommendations .................... .................. 5 VI. Proposed 1~4itigation Measures ..................... .................. 6 VII. References .................................... .................. 7 APPENDICES Appendix. A -Tables Appendix B -Figures Appendix C -Site photos Appendix D - GPS TRACKS LOG Appendix E -Species Observed -ii- Tura Donsoid 8: A.:_sociares • f. C~~Ec~1~=1~'6ATEC3i~w CF_RTIFICATION: "I herebycerfifythatthestatementsfurnishedaboveandintheattachedexi~ibits present the dafa and information required for this biological evaluation, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are frue and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Fieldwork conducted for this assessn, ent was performed by me or under my o'irecr supervision. 1 certify that I have not signed anon-disclosure a consultant confidentiality agreement with the project applicant or applicant's representative and (hat I have no financial interesf in the project." DATE~~~ / (-i__~~C Fieldwork Performed By: t~!ame f-fieldwork Peifiormed By: Name SIGN Name Fieldwork Performed By: Name -1- Tom. Uoosoni 8: /'•ssocinrs Fieldwork Performed By: ll. E=)4f.~:lb'~lVk_utJfViEt~~'t~1' i Tom Dodson 8: Associates (I DA) has prepared this report to relay the Endings of a focused i botanical survey along the proposed Wilson Avenue e>aension project site between Wardrnan Eullock Road and East Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, California. The project site can be found on pages 573 and 574, in sections 2J, and 2A respc-ccively of the 2007 Thomas Guide. The project site is located in the USGS -Cucamonga Peak Quadrangle, 7.5 P/inute Series, Tovmship 1 Noith, Range 6 West, Sections 2'I, 22, 27, and 28 (Figures 1 and 2). The proposed project is located on the Etivdanda Creek alluvial fan. The elevation within the project area is approximately 1,820 above mean s:;a level. The climate in ti~is area is characterized by hot swrnners, mild winters and rainfall, which occurs almost entirely in.the winter and early spring months. The average annual rainfall for the local area is about '19 inches. Average temperatures range from 38°F (degrees Fahrenheit) in January to an averaoe of 97°f= in July. Winds occur from all directions, with onshore winds from the ~mesUsouthwest occurring during the day. At night, wind patterns reverse vdith an offshore flow. generally coming from the east/northeast. These predominate wind patterns are broken by occasional ~a~inter storms and Santa Ana winds. The latter are strong northerly or northeasterly ciry winds, vdhich o.^cur during Septemberthrougl i ~4arch. T he vegetation onsite wire characterized by Holland community types which are indicated by species dominance. Changes between adjacent Holland community types are often a fairly subtle process and frequently represents a shift in species dominance ratherihan species turnover. Many species, particularly weedy native and alien species, occur in scattered patches throughout the project site. Riversidean alluvial fan sage scrub (RAFSS) and non native ruderal were the bvo Holland community types easily noted in the project area. RAFSS is a regionally significant habitat • type confned to river and creep floodplains of southern San Bernardino and northwest Riverside counties. RAFSS provides habitat for a variety of wildlife species, most of which are common, widespread, and can be observed in several community types. This habitat type also supports a myriad of regionally sensitive flora and fauna, unique to this region. Approximately QO% of the site I is comprised of highly disturbed RAFSS. • _ ~.. `tbn~~ Dodson P: Llssc: i~~.res Ed`s. dVdGl6-dd~9~~L~~7'1' A search u+as conducted on the CNDDL3 for special status species. The Cucamonga Peak quad where the project occurred was searched as ~a+ell as adjacent quads; specifically Devore, Fontana, I Guisti, Ontario, and A4cunt Baldy quads. A total of 25 special status plant species were found to occur within these quads, hovdc-ver the site only had habitat that would be appropriate for six of l ti~ese species (see table 1). Soils were determined using the mapping f!mction available on the USDA National Soil Survey Center web pane (Soil Sun+ey Staff. Cons~llting biologist C.J. Fothcringham concucted the botanical survey on May 25, ?007 from mid- morning to mid-afternoon. The site was v~+alked from west to east in a meandering path with the intentional bias of choosing a path that allo+n+2d viewing of all areas. A species IisY was made recording all species that occurred vdith collections of plant parts for species not readily identifiable in fhe Held. During the course of the survey a GPS (Magellen Gold, accuracy ± 3m) was canted o maintain accuracy, recorrJ exact location of any special status species encountered and record actual walked transect. Tracks recorded on the GPS were subsequently dovdnloaded and exported io a spreadsheetforrnat (Appendix. I I) Species not readily recognizable in the field were Keyed using the Jepson manual, {Hickman, 1993) Cah;lora.ory, and a Leica dissecting microscope (7x-30x). There we-re no probbems encountered or limitations that may influence results of the field surveys. No protocol surveys were conducted as part of this general biological survey. u • 3- i OP:7 IJOUSOh! ~: ~..SSOCIP.TES The project area (mapl) was primarily vegetated (photo 1-3) in highly disturbed Riversidean alluvial fan sage scrub (RAFSS) v~ith dominance primarily by non-native species such as Hirschfeldia incana Qvlediterranean Hoary Mustard), Brassica tournefortii (Asian Mustard), Erodium cicutaria (filaree) and 6romus spp. (Brome grasses). A total of fourty plant species were identified within the project area (table 2). Fifteen of these species (38% of the total species) were non-native and accounted for the majority of coverage. Common native species on the site included Eriogonwn fasicularum (California buckwheat) Lotus scoparium (Deer weed), arld Astragalus pomonensis (Pomona mills vetch). No special status species wera found to occur on the project site including those for which there was potential habitat as identified in the CNDDB (see table 1). Soils are mapped as -30% Psamments and Fluvents which are frequently flooded, -2% Soboba gravelly loamy sand with 0-9 percent slopes and -6II%Soboba stony loarny sand m~ith 2-9 percent slopes (see Appendix I). The land uses in the vicinity of project are a open space, residential, industrial and cornmercial. Utility infrastructure (electricity, water, sewer and natural gas) exists within the project alignment and will be managed to minimize any outages required to complete construction and relr~cate the utility infrastructure within or adjacent to the proposed improvements. -I opography is relatively flat with the overall slope at one percent or less to the southwest. The result of the investigation is that no state or federally listed endangered or threater~ed plant species were observed during the Feld survey. • • -4- I GA9 ^GDJGN ~': /~SSOCIL~TES 'E. I~t~l't`~o~.~~ f'a{~~~ F~iL e~E~T~E ~S Gf~~~~ ~ SQo~?5 Relative to plants, there are no probable impacts to threatened, rare, endangered or unique species either listed or proposed by a Federal or State agency, or the California Native Plant Society. This project vdill however disrupt the continuity of an important habitat or hahitatlvdildlife corridor. 1. No additional invesfigations are recorrlrnended for this project site prior to considering this project for approval. ~. This site will not be modified prior to project approval and will result in the minor loss of ~ sensitive habitat. i ~l. C-lased ors tine data collected and analyzed, it vdas determined that project may result in the discharge of fill material into waters that technically meet the parameters for non-wetland i, wraters of the United States. Based on i:his assumption to be.determined by tl'le Corps, a ' permit frolTl the Corps and RWCCB would he required. Activities that: usually involve a regulated discharge of dredged or fill materials include (but are not limited to) grading, ~ placing of riprap for erosion control, pouring concrete, laying sod, preparing soil'for planting (e.g., turning soil over, adding soil amendments'), stockpiling e>;cavaied material, mechanized removal of vegetation, and driving of piles for certain types of structures. I P,cti~.rities that do not involve a regulated discharge (if performed in a manner to avoid i discharges) include excavation, placing a structure, driving pilings (for transportation structures), clearing of vegetation using hand held equipment and working above the • ground surface, purciping water, and walking or driving vehicles. 1 ~ Similar planting activities associated with ongoing farming operations may be exempt from regulation by Section 404 of the Clean Waler Act. -5- l OIW DODSON $ /ASSOCIATES ~r3, t-'~=aC?~f? s~~ Il,~ll~~l~a~!~~oEv ~viE~s~f~r_--.~ NII T IGAiION RECOMMENDATIONS: Post consfrucfion activities should then result in the restoration, enhancement and protection of the remaining existing habitat This should include a flue-year rnonitoring c5`ort anti conservation easments. 7-he project will require a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPFP) wiiicl~~ will identify methods to protect the water quality during construction. It is understood that regulatory permits are required for this project. Potential mitigation could come in the form of purchasing credits form a local mitigation bards and possible channel enhancements following construction in areas that can support riparian habitat or a payment info an approved conservation district. • • -6- Torv~ 13oosor! 8:l~ssoa;~r=s ~f@d. I~L.~ F~~~=r'dG~'~ California Natural Diversity Data Base (iVDDB). 2004. Annotated record search for special animals, plants and natural communities -Redlands quadranele. Natural Heritage Division, Sacramento, California. Flickman, James C., F_d. 1993. The Jepson ruianual: Higher Flanis of Cali,`ornia. University of California Press, Berkeley, California. Holland, Robert F., Ph.D. 'i 986. I-'relirninary Descriprions of the Terres%ral Natural Communities of California. Califiornia Department of Fish and Game Nongame Heritage Program (new fJatural Heritage Division), Sacramento. October. Holland, V.L. and Keil, David J. 1990. California Vegetation, 4`" ed. Ei Corral Publications, San Luis Obispo, California. Munz, P.A. 1974. A Flora of Southern California. 1,086 pp. O'Leary, J.F. 1989. California Coastal Sage Scrub: General characteristics and considerations ficr biologicalconscrvationinEndangeredplantcommunitiesofsouthemCalifornia. Proceedings of the 15"' annual symposium, southern California botanists. Special Report No. 3. Editor A.A. Schoenherr. ~ Skinner, M.W. and B. (~1. Pavlik, eds. 1994. Inventory of Rare and Enoangered Vascular Plants of • California, 5'" edition. California Native Plant Society, Sacramento, California. State of California. 1998. Flnnual F;el:rort on the Status of California State Listed Threatened and Endangered Animals and Plants. Natural heritage Division, Department of Fish and Game, Sacramento, California. • U.S.DepartmentofAyriculture.1971. Soil Surveyofl4/esrernSan Bernardino Area,California. Soil Conservation Service, Washington, D.C. USDI Fish and Wildlife Service. 1993. Endangered and threatened wildlife and plants; Determination of threatened status for the coastal California gnatcatcher. 58 Federal Register 16742-16757. -7- Tome DoosoN 8: Associ~rrs i G~~yPtifJDi)r A T~EiLES • • Tora Don:,ov & E~ssncvir~=_ • G d) N Ul 4) V! N C G C O d C f C CJ V1 O) VI O) N N V1 f~ t9 N VI N Vl N u) N N D) ~ .~ .... N `) ~. n. n n o- ~ a m TS a n c~ C m m N ~~ L O a L O~ m N m N E a ~ ~ a m~ ~ <g a> > m m rn N m m N G J C. E L L L N U O N U O L L L U U N U d CJ Z Z Z Z (1 n d w N Z Z Z O B o N N 4) m w ~ `~ ~- o c o a~ m o ~ o ~ C N m ~. c Vr N ~ _U L ~~ N N E O .O U~ O IG d ~ N~ J O ~ T N -O E O N E >~ n C_ -6 C m U L rfl N m U Z` O 1! N 'C N N ~ N N L ~U ~ O RCN . `- O ~ ` ~ ~U Y= ulal•. dC N N LL N N J O ~ C m I~ N y ._ ~ G) m al m ~ O ~- CA U m ~ ! _ ~ T N - C U ~ -O d L` ]- C O ~ ~- N C m N r ' O = v i m L V O .m C O C ~ ~ ~ N N m T r- a L (n ~ >` N O ~~ C m N~ m ~ ~ Gi~ O ms ~ E ~ ~ ' ~ G .LI ~. N ~ a ~ ~ i Q O N E O O ~ ~ O N L E 4 0 N N 0 0 ~ m E ~ a~ a N U ~n p N E I N o ~ ~ U 'w NcN ro ~ m U " ~ ° c ~ o ~m ~m CJ '~.~o v . Q m m o N C ' m a i L : a i~r U ~ Ea~-o C ~ O ~E 'd' ~ w M '~ U E ~ ` ~ - rp , - N~ O'er m O N o 0 0 ~ 3 u N ~ o 0 C7 E u, ~ ~ O o 3 ~ 0 3 r` m> ~ v, > m m M o N N L L m N C L`t L a N O O m N ~ C m C J m J _ G~ - J ~ ~ m O E C h N d ~ O U d U a Vr _ . C m O 0~ ~ ~ r ~ E N m O C ~ o - E~ E w e n o E .. o ~ a 3 N h a N m "e N N N m m -.a .N 2 N u VI ~ N C N m~ ~ ms ooa U o U -~~ J O O ~ .D ~.d`~ E~ J (O p fO ~ N N fl O a S N C m ~ N (L6 'O '~~ C O . ~ ' ~ p E ~ N N O n N N y~ O N m N N N m ~ L U L O U m m m 0 ~ m O z ~ d U d m U o v ~ U U ~ U ~ ° U (7 VJ M N N N N N a m of m m m ;~ m co m z _ U _ v~ -a Q 'o Q Q a; R Q ~ m m W _ Z W Z Z Z Z Z c W N y ro N y _t ~ m '~ ¢ ~ Q Q Q Q 4 ~° c L (n W Z W Z Z Z Z~ Z W d ~ m G N - m p O O - O m N a m E N- UI U N ? N m L y ~ m p 3 ul , m >. w C N j -O .d ,~ ~+ m N UCl O N E N ~ ? E C7 Z VI - d E a U) 3 N a .~ N ~ ~ ro ~ o m c~ m E a ~ ~' m m~ ~ . ~ a ~ ; ~ a Z ~ ~ ~ h m ro ~ = c C C ~_- O U ~ O N ~ .~ C ~' . C~ O ~ ~ .- . C> j w ' m ~ ° tq ` s E E m c `m ' a ~ v `c~ c i E c a =~ o o. ~ . , ' ' m c m ~ o o f o o c c ~ '~ °' `w m m~ mo .c `m tm v mm v omm v E E ~ ¢ ¢ m U> v a v> > ~ • • C G C C ro N V N N N ~ J N a O N N d "' ~? Q a ri c c ~' c ~ N ~ N N N N N is p N m Q N m ai N m N N N .'~ O = ~= O) N N ~ N ~ a~ e) d ~ N O o d m ~ N ~ d C D_ C r OC ~ ~ ~ r ~ ~ ~ L O ~ L O N ~ ~ ~ m C ~ ~) O (I1 G m .U U C m ~ C . C . ~ N m m m ~. ~ U O Z L O U O~ L p U 0 0 0 0 L L L L O N U O O N U O O C R N U C O N U O C O O O O O C C C O_ G C C Z Z Z ~ U Q. N N Y Z Q. N G) Y Z O- N U) O.. N N - C G U N a p ~ p G N O '~ O N E Y C p N C ~ ~ N ~ N C O~ N ` N 1` d N G N N N 3 ~ ~ ~ ~ m N .il ~ U ~~ O O N C ~ O C L7 `~ U •J ~ G N C T N~ a C) N R a L d) U N G r O m C tfJ C O L ~) O OJ ~ - ~ L O) I~ O N O N C °) N m E N C 'n O N (0 E C~ F N N N . N O U L N t6 N N C -%~ ?• N a) '~ m o O m oa O N O 'r n ~ O c R U7 T a l0 N N ro N _O a N N E. T O E c > L N O T`: O O O C R O a> N U E N~ R Cu a .m d'~ O a E N E . -' a G Q N m ` N C E U o a U ~- O - C» N O> O f0 O C O m Z• N " d) C N 4) N O N ~. ~ O O ~, m d 0 t ~ C c~ (O O ~ O J OJ O ~ V ^ O L . N N O O " ^ O U ,. !1 N N - I~ - O _ UJ ) N ~ of m > O) N O N ., c ) __ _ _ __ ____ .. ~~ .n `° N N ~ o N~ ~ N N o o N ~ m In N U N m ~ ` a ~~ ~ m v2 `o- id m ° my ~ mc ~m ~m o ~~ Nw _ `- m ~ w I N ._ .O N - tG ~ G O m C N O C O °_ O G N O O ~ N a C E m ( p N O O~ L O O U N E y O ~ U ~ C U U E ~O O O Gl N p n ) N N y m N a U ~ N N .N N I m N a .~ N N N N G _ ~ N _ Q j N 3= ~ O N U , O - U~ y L ~ C~ U N U O _ U O U C N C N N a) n N ~ N~ Y6 O. p ~ U r 7 0 ,~ a 0 0 .L1 C ~ N E ~ O C'r- `-O ~ C E'i c '^ ~wJ C N i ~ O Q > 1 L ~ ~ O O p O E ~ _- N." + a N - E a m ~ E c~ a E w O N a ~~ o o . i ~ ~ N ~ U E d U Q m 7 Ip m m N O L O O m j O N a 3 `O O v i ) N F -- N C- U~ L O ~ - ' U L U N U O ,~ U U m U U ~ ~ ~ J O J Q] L~ _ N N M N N N M ~") ~^ CCl CO m m m m m m N m - _ U - __ _ _ m~ a 2 U d Q Q Q Q Q Q w m uJ ~ w L z z Z z z Z N to _-_- ~ N d ~ a m a Q -° Q ¢ Q Q Q Q Q It fn W Z W Z Z Z _ Z Z Z Z N N ` ~ a a O m ~ m r O ~ a C N E E ~ N N N N N m N .-. Y N m ro a C j L 3 N C m G N O C CJ) O >` L N ~ N O m O L - C m ~ E C ~~ T N m ~` C Y m C ~ O C N G N C C N ' C 'p m G O m 0 L p J N N - 'O C O p E C m m e ~O m d d 0 O L ~ ¢ y E ~ m ~ O i m U C 'C " ~ N m '~ m E ~ °' c o 'm h ~ ~ ~ v N N ~ o h Y ` ~° E c ~ m m m a° -o y o~c m ~ a ~~ om O Q ~ ma 'i . ~ ~~ L a O~ ~ N ? .~ ~ > p rn O ~ ~ y W ~ W E ° = a m -~ ~ -i -1 , -I ~ E i~ • O) N N N N N /J G) U1 n, vl N VI O N 01 ~ N L7 d d 2 C C 2 m m m m is m E .~ m ~ .. m _ m ~ m F ~ t - c s n n o 0 0 0 n U z z z z ~ ___ ~ _ N O ~ N N ~ GJ a C r N ~ O ~ N N N G m m ~ E '° o ~ ~ ~- U N ~, C ~ ~ ~ -p N m ui i N u in O N O y T+ C N m N n - o C U ~_ -: O QI N .D N U l/1 ~ N ~ in O. N ~ > .O > L ~ ~ vi p N '~ N N in O _ Gl ~ U F = in GJ ' 1] = O N m U O ~_ C 6 !~ r N E .6 ~ a n..U ~ d C >. .p. y U _o C j~ O E O E .N N C .~ n N a Cn E U C N C O ~- L S O CA y O N N N N l7 1' ~ E N'~ 7 _ cam'. (n Y d O r _ ~M O'O dU~ ',C O G) N C O J C uiN 'p N N N G) 3 N N (G h N Oi N - C G C N C O ~ d L N N N> O U~ N N >. N ~ ~ Y U N '~ N E O C to O ~ N> O .C ~ _, U C O N- E.o N N N E E y U N N i9 N N rn ~ N N ~ N y N N N r_ -p y N .D N O C N O 'C C N O N .- 'O d O N d N ~ T N ? O ~ N C B y~ N to N C U E (0 in U (6 d O U C '~- ~ O ~ N U~ N `S N U N ~ N U N m N O c E E~ y U n. _- N N ' " -6 O O N O :- O m m o m° .c m ~~ a i~ ~ ~ m m o m~ a~ m 0 m N d ~ L ~.~ ~ ¢ s p N E d U°O °c °' U N o O3 U v1 E o _ ~ ¢ _ ~ N N N ~- Z 0] Cfl m ~j CO U _ v~ Q Q Q ~.. Q Q ~; m m Z L ~ Z L 7_ ~ N m ~, d ~ ° d ` Q Q Q Q Q Q .. LL. (/7 Z Z Z Z Z Z d ~C G p C E - G Y O 6 ~p N ~ N N O~ O N ~ O N C C~ C ~ OI N N ~ ~ m °~~ ~ ~ ~ U a.~ ° a E (~ r m y ~O O~ p ry O O (0t Nin ~ a E d c ~ d ~ ~ (/J U (11 N N m o, `~~° m a E ~ ~ _ _ ~ w y4 ~ ~ ~ N ~ Z N ~ ~ o N O N C N U . ~ ~ C ~ k N , j a ~ N j U N (0 Q C C o . °i o m m oQ a E° n ~ 2 O O h ~ c ~ a ( r--€cu~ es • TGrq Doosora v. ASSGCIATES 1=1GURE 1. VdILSOD! AVEi~!UE EXTEf~!Sldfd PROJECT VIGICJITY • I r:~' ~. r f 'C~~- i~~'~ri ix....r -~av~~•ie. l T ~" rim ~i~: ~.. 1 1 Ip a~ ~ -d_ r~l ~,1~/- f - 9 , ~ l ~ 1 ~. ~a~ ~ } 'V ~ ~ ' y _ . ~ ~ ~'~ ,„ 1 • a ~ ~ ~ ~'~- ~ . 'ems' !~,. r' ^~~ ~~( y~~(~T ~ ~'~~ v~ r ~ f t ,rn w' ~ ~ y~~ j ~`~' l ~ ~~~ ~ ~! / ' fa i /// / ! •C 4 ~ ~ ~. ~~ ;,~;' ~~ c. '~' ~ ~' ~: . _ !~.~. `.l f roject Vicinity !r _ G h- ~ ..a. n y s.... 1 a 1 . ' r _ C` ~ ~3~^ ~~'4 ` ~~ ` ~~~ ./ ~ aj ' r t~~ ~ ` ~ ~N ~ ~ 1 ~ _ ! FtGUf3E 2. vUILSUfV AVENUE EY.'fEf'JS(UN PF;UJP_CT SI ~ E LUC/al lON CE?V1,~ct:N I I~LjF~hDM/'^.I\ [;ULLOC:I~i fZr~G "c%\S'C I~.VENUE • r i ..tee....) . ~.~~n.~ i _20 .j.-,~.- ~T, .. .. ~ _ ' _~ ;- 1 J(J ~/] iE ~ ~-Y e iR I, 861 ~~~ ~1~.1 `a_ /~~ ~\ ff + /~_-111 o-.: i... 1 i x\1 j I, _ ~' / \ ~ _ \) //~ II t1 __- M __ li - __ \ / 1 / I J I ~ ~ ~ ` / , ~- - I ~- <~ r" ~ ~ ~ / q.'.\~' ~ I 600/ s _ 1 ~ .-~~ ~ v~ ;~ I i r ~ • ~ / ~ Protect Siie \ /~ S ~-'t~'' ~ ~ '.i J ~~,i ~ F. 1 ='-if - -- ~ P I ' "~ ~ ~~ Water o - ~ ~ I j I _ cv Tanh ~$l0 I ~-". -. Ii ~~..~ - ~ j ~ 1 ~% r i-2~`. ~~ ~ I ~ i% ~~ ~ '_ ~ : ~ /summit Ave ,% I2 ~ ._~ .i'~. ~ -~ I ~__ _:-.-- ~auL - i I~ ~27 C I - . I'. ' I - I r' 1~ .. _ I ~' ~ ~ Y~ ~~ ~. al . 4, i. -- a I I 'N ~. .f ~ F 1. ~ h' fi_, f o I i~ • a 0 !~ o c- j o Ip ~ C U c ra n m a~ ~.N m c 'w m ~ v > o c 5 ^' O~ • ~N ~a C C ~m o =; o ul c c v ~ SI C -l' Na d ~ C O N'- C N dK N ~ ~~ ON ~ O C O ~~ INN ,_ 1~ U ~_ O O N ~_ ,N N V1 ~ N 0. m C o~ N N >.G) r°:' N N - ai u) n a~ NU C n yZ U O NN O O N ~ d~ ~z N N 7 ~ N O Z~ ZU 0 ~~I' r • i • 'G rJ O LY 1 (li O C ° ~ C3 C U ~ c ~ 'b ~ ~ d c .n ai c ~ ra N N > > L C 7 N o ~ U) ~ ro ~ ~ O U o w C C ~ N m 3 N N m ~ C O ro 'w a m ~ ~ro o ~ ~ o 0 w ei ~ o ~ rn f ~ ~ O () 09 N ~ ~ G> _ S. N w a) ~ a o .u Q o o : m U ~ ~ _ co ~ ~ ~ O C U N N U Cn L (a a Y) ~ . , ) J 4) O . ( j N ~-- N 'O ~ N ~1' L_ O) L L ~' w UJ w ~ ~~ 'C a~ ~ -' L ) ~ _~ N - U mF ~ ~~ .-->~ ~U ' o r~ ° C O v ~ CJJ r~ ,_ E ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~) U) r: u) ' a~ Q~ __ f F-- i C L (a - ~ N N ~ L ~! L C r O 1 t~ ~ U O ,,.. C _ . e) p N _ m r ~ o e m o ~) `~ . , _e`~ .c is N o ~ `- N e ~ ~ o ~:_ v, _. ~ n e~ u' o~ 0 3 r r) o ~ ~, m N N ~~ a) a N ~ o ` ~ c n N ro E~ N n .n ~ -.. c o ai u) o w - 1] C) G ~ - ~ a~ F -"~ i ~, c " m ~ Co ~. •~ ~ -~ _ is ) o o m ) m ~ a) ~ s win a'. 1- N c .~ ~". > C }, w ~~ N N t7 O N O N N N w N ro F7 G -~ ci) ~ [9 a ~ ^ m O ~ <- O ro -f°- O c 2 _ N r ~ ~~ ` w ' ro '' C) d ~ U o ~ r' o a_c) w ' iq o -: -: a) ~ `- N ~) 2m ra o N c m E g C) Ca O: O F U _N O U)Sv C L I- O (~ v)U U) CJ O ^ - L O E t- U. o e) ] ~n m C '^ m o t -° °~ ~ U . > r ~ ~ m v~ C ~, ° a> L~ m c N m ° a ~ w ~ ti N N ~,) Z ~ E N is ~ U) o O1 2 U ~ ° r ~ ~ ~ y ~ J m N N d Ol N QJ > ~ O c O v) O +~ v > ~ O w o~ ~ ~ (n ~ O J m G1 Itl N 'gyp ' ~ G ~ ~ W ~-l ~~ ~ y l~~ ~ ) a ~ ' m (] C ~ ~ . ` a~ ~ 1! a N C ~ ~p ° ~ w o ~ m \ m ~ (7 a ? ~= W J Q„ -- o Q ~ o a~ m n w N ~ N ~ ~ N .~ N ~ ~ ~ N ^ ' d V ~ _ ~ O ~ ~ > > ~ a~ d a m ,_ o O a n _ a ~ ?~ 3 ~ t0 ~ ~ o 0 m c m ~ m ~~ ° v ~ O o n to o a ~ ~ w >. m ._& a) ~ o o o n w m ~ o a v) a Q ~ LL ° 3 ~ o ~ m > > _ a m ~ N u aci Y c a a) Y N ° Q - ~ N ~ v ¢ m .o ~ o (n 'o m a o m ~ o m v v c~ N C~ ~ ~ ~ ~ m ~ c ~ N ~ a) a o ~ ~m v) m (n a~i (n c ~°- in v) o w a w ° w ti ~~ o~ ~~ c~! (.) cu a) N Ln a~ ra L_. Q1 r (» c~! ~, >-, w ^~ N _) :='• G') m : ai 0 0 CO o O ~~1 (.~ \ r~l r c. m m v e) ~~ C. a~ J' c`; co +- 0.: (~' =N ~o Z U OI ~Ih. Sail Map-San Bernardino County Southe~~estern Part, California Wilson Road extension between Eiiwanda Avenue and VVardman Bullock Road ~ Mr~iS' ~ i j~~: I4!' 6'ti 4?•: I'... G ~,i G Ii C G San Bernardino County Southwestern Pari, Caiiton',ia (CA877) &7ap Dnlt Sy!nl;ol A+ap Llnli I'Ial:l° UCrE$ 10 AOi Fercent of AO! ~__ ~ Ps PSAMMENTS AND 11.6 30.0% PI.UVENTS, FREQUENTLY FLOODED - - -- - JI - --- SoC OBOBA GRAVELLY LOAMY' J _ -- 0.71 1.3% SAND, 0 TO 0 PERCENT L SLOPES ~pC SOBOBA Sl"ONY LOAMY 26.3 G8.2% SAND, 2 TO 0 PERCENT ~ -__ LOPES ___ - _ --._ • Tetals for Area cf L~tcresl (AOI) 38.fi 100.0% USDn Natural Resources ~'0 Conservation Service Web Soil Survey 2.0 National Cooperative Soil Survey G/28/200~/ Page 3 0. 3 nQ~i=~~nc.: c sl-r r_ eHD ~ os • I i • T Ofd DDDSOIJ B: P.SSOCU TGS Photo Legend Photo 1. Overviev/ of sight frorn the western edge looping east. Photo ?_. Overview of sight from near thz middle looking east. Photo 3. Overview of sight from the eastern edge looking west. • ,~ Appendix D Traffic Impact Analysis ~~, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA WILSON AVENUE EXTENSION TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS Prepared by: Mark A. Santa Ines, Alicia Ayers, QPOFESSlp~, Carl Ballard and ~~e~~v ~, A. K~,~2~ ~c William Kunzman, P.E. y w 3 No. TR0056 ~ ~~' ~q~OF CAI February 28, 2007 l~t..1NZMAN ASSOCIATES IIII TOWN ~'i L.OUNTR\' ROAD, SUITE 34 ORANGE, LA 92868-4667 PHONE: (714) 973-8383 FAX: (714) 973-8821 EMAIL: AdA ILA"BAFFIC-ENGIIQEER.QIM WER: \NWW.TRAFFIC-ENGINEER.COM • • Table of Contents I. Introduction ...................................:..................................1 A. Project Description ..................................................................1 B. Study Area ...............................................................................2 C. Analysis Methodology ................................................:............2 D. Definition of Deficiency ...........................................................4 II. Existing Conditions ..........................................................6 A. Existing Roadway System ........................................................6 B. Existing Volumes .....................................................................6 C. Existing Level of Service .........................................................6 D. Existing Traffic Signal Warrant ................................................7 E. Planned Transportation Improvements and Relationship to General Plan .............................................................................7 III. Year 2030 Conditions .....................................................16 A. Year 2030 Volumes .................................................................16 B. Year 2030 Level of Service .....................................................16 • C. Year 2030 Traffic Signal Warrant Analysis ............................16 IV. Conclusions and Recommendations .............................21 A. Summary ................................................................................21 B. Existing Conditions ...............................................................22 C. Future Conditions ..................................................................22 D. Conclusions ...........................................................................23 E. Recommendations .................................................................23 APPENDICES Appendix A-Glossary of Transportation Terms Appendix B -Traffic Count Worksheets Appendix C -Future Growth Increment Calculation Worksheets Appendix D -Explanation and Calculation of Intersection Delay Appendix E -Traffic Signal Warrant Worksheets • List of Tables Table 1. Existing Intersection Delay and Level of Service ....................................8 Table 2. Year 2030 Intersection Delay and Level of Service ..............................17 • •' • t_ist of Figures Figure 1. Project Location Map ............................................................................ 5 Figure 2. Existing Through Travel Lanes and Intersection Controls ................................................................................................ 9 Figure 3. Existing Average Daily Traffic Volumes ..............................................10 Figure 4. Existing Morning Peak Hour Intersection Turning Movement Volumes ............................................................................11 Figure 5. Existing Evening Peak Hour Intersection Turning Movement Volumes ...........................................:................................ 12 Figure 6. City of San Bernardino General Plan Circulation Element ..............................................................................................13 Figure 7. City of San Bernardino General Plan Roadway Cross- Sections (Part 1) .................................................................................14 • Figure 8. City of San Bernardino General Plan Roadway Cross- Sections (Part 2) ................................................................................. 15 Figure 9. Year 2030 Average Daily Traffic Volumes .......................................... 18 Figure 10. Year 2030 Morning Peak Hour Intersection Turning Movement Volumes ............................................................................ 19 Figure 11. Year 2030 Evening Peak Hour Intersection Turning Movement Volumes ............................................................................ 20 Figure 12. Circulation Recommendations ..............................:............................ 24 f~ I. Introduction • The purpose of this report is to provide an assessment of the traffic impacts resulting from the Wilson Avenue Extension, and to identify the traffic mitigation measures necessary to maintain the established level of service standard for the elements of the impacted roadway system. The City of Rancho Cucamonga is the lead agency responsible for preparation of the traffic impact analysis. This report analyzes traffic impacts for existing and Year 2030 traffic conditions. Although this is a technical report, every effort has been made to write the report clearly and concisely. To assist the reader with those terms unique to transportation engineering, a glossary of terms is provided in Appendix A. A. Project Description Wilson Avenue is identified as a Modified Major Arterial with Median and is an integral part of the City's General Plan. Wilson Avenue has a connection to the I-15 Freeway to the east. Wilson Avenue is currently not a thoroughfare and is discontinuous from Etiwanda Avenue to its existing terminus with Wardman Bullock Road. The City is proposing to extend Wilson Avenue from Etiwanda Avenue easterly to intersect with Wardman • Bullock Road. A study area map showing the project location is provided on Figure 1. Presently eastbound traffic on Wilson Avenue at Etiwanda Avenue must detour to Banyan Street to reach destinations to the east. Vehicles also currently use Banyan Street to travel westbound from the existing terminus of Wilson Avenue. Banyan Street is bordered by a City park, elementary school, and residential land uses. Completion of the Wilson Avenue Extension will provide traffic relief to Banyan Street and lessen the potential for pedestrian related accidents associated with activities occurring adjacent to schools, parks, and residential streets. The traffic study includes information that the Federal Highway Administration and the California Department of Transportation requires for Federal funding through the State Transportation Improvement Program. Wilson Avenue will eventually be a continuous route. Today, there is a gap or missing link in its mid-section. Wilson Avenue completes a local and circulation link in the City's General Plan. Wilson Avenue is currently discontinuous between Etiwanda Avenue and Wardman Bullock Road. This is a gap of approximately 1.25 miles in approximately the mid-section of the 3 mile route. Wilson Avenue is located • parallel to and approximately 1 mile north of the I-210 Freeway. Wilson Avenue will serve to shorten local trips that are currently not provided with a continuous east-west corridor. B. Study Area • Local access is provided by various roadways in the study area. The north- south roadways which will be most affected by the project include Day Creek Boulevard, Etiwanda Avenue, East Avenue, Wardman Bullock Road, and Cherry Avenue. The east-west roadways which will be most affected by the project are Wilson Avenue and Banyan Street. C. AnalVSis MethodofogV The analysis of the traffic impacts from the proposed development and the assessment of the required mitigation measures were based on an evaluation of the existing and forecast traffic conditions in the vicinity of the site with and without the project. The following analysis years are considered in this report: Existing Conditions (2007) • Horizon Year Conditions (2030) Existing intersection traffic conditions were established through morning and evening peak hour traffic counts obtained by Kunzman Associates from December 2006 (see Appendix B). • - In addition, truck classification counts were conducted at the study area intersections. The existing percent of trucks was used in the conversion of trucks to Passenger Car Equivalent's. The average daily traffic volume forecasts have been determined using the growth increment approach on the East Valley Traffic Model traffic model Year 2000 and Year 2030 average daily traffic volume forecasts (see Appendix C). This difference defines the growth in traffic over the 30-year period. The incremental growth in average daily traffic volume has been factored to reflect the forecast growth between Year 2007 and Year 2030. For this purpose, linear growth between the Year 2000 base condition and the forecast Year 2030 condition was assumed. Since the increment between Year 2007 and Year 2030 is 23 years of the 30-year time frame, a factor of 0.77 (i.e., 23/30) was used. The Year 2030 daily and peak hour directional roadway segment volume forecasts have been determined using the growth increment approach on the East Valley Traffic Model Year 2000 and Year 2030 peak hour volumes. The growth increment calculation worksheets are shown in Appendix C. Current peak hour intersection approach/departure data is a necessary input to this approach. The existing traffic count data serves as both the starting point-for the refinement process, and also provides important insight into current travel • patterns and the relationship between peak hour and daily traffic conditions. The initial turning movement proportions are estimated based upon the relationship of each approach leg's forecast traffic volume to the other legs 2 forecast volumes at the intersection. The initial estimate of turning movement proportions is then entered into a spreadsheet program consistent with the National Cooperative Highway Research Program Report 255. A linear programming algorithm is used to calculate individual turning movements that match the known directional roadway segment volumes computed in the previous step. This program computes a likely set of intersection turning movements from intersection approach counts and the initial turning proportions from each approach leg. Quality control checks and forecast adjustments were performed as necessary to ensure that all future traffic volume forecasts reflect a minimum of 10% growth over existing traffic volumes. The result of this traffic forecasting procedure is a series of traffic volumes suitable for traffic operations analysis. The technique used to assess the capacity needs of an intersection is known as the Intersection Delay Method (see Appendix D) based on the 2000 Highwav Capacity Manual -Transportation Research Board Special Report 209. To calculate delay, the volume of traffic using the intersection is compared with the capacity of the intersection. Signalized intersections are considered deficient (Level of Service F) if the overall intersection critical - volume to capacity radio equals or exceeds 1.0, even if the level of service defined by the delay value is below the defined Level of Service standard. • The volume to capacity ratio is defined as the critical volumes divided by the intersection capacity. A volume to capacity ratio greater than 1.0 implies an infinite queue. The Level of Service analysis for signalized intersections has been performed using optimized signal timing. This analysis has included an assumed lost time of two seconds per phase. Signal timing optimization has considered pedestrian safety and signal coordination requirements. Appropriate time for pedestrian crossings have also been considered in the signalized intersection analysis. The following formula has been used to calculate the pedestrian minimum times for all Highway Capacity Manual runs: [(Curb to curb distance) / (4 feet/second)] + 7 seconds For existing traffic conditions, saturation flow rates of 1,800 vehicles per hour of green for through and right turn lanes and 1,700 vehicles per lane for single left turn lanes, 1,600 vehicles per lane for dual left turn lanes and 1,500 vehicles per lane for triple left turn lanes have been assumed for the capacity analysis. For Year 2030 traffic conditions, saturation flow rates of 1,900 vehicles per hour of green for through and right turn lanes and 1,800 vehicles per lane for • single left turn lanes, 1,700 vehicles per lane for dual left turn lanes and 1,800 vehicles per lane for double right turn lanes have been assumed for the capacity analysis. 3 • The peak hour traffic volumes have been adjusted to peak 15 minute volumes for analysis purposes using the existing observed peak 15 minute to peak hour factors for all scenarios analyzed. Where feasible improvements in accordance with the local jurisdiction's General Plan and which result in acceptable operations cannot be identified, the Year 2030 peak hour factor has been adjusted upwards to 0.95. This is to account for the effects of congestion on peak spreading. Peak spreading refers to the tendency of traffic to spread more evenly across time as congestion increases. The traffic mitigation needs anticipated for the Year 2030 were combined into a summary of mitigation requirements. D. Definition of Deficiency The following definition of deficiency has been developed in accordance with. the City of Rancho Cucamonga requirements. The definition of an intersection deficiency has been obtained from the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan. The General Plan states that peak hour intersection operations of Level of Service D or better are generally acceptable. Therefore, any intersection operating at Level of Service E to F will be considered deficient. ~' 4 • II. Existing Conditions A. Existinq Roadway System Figure 2 identifies the existing conditions for study area roadways. The number of through lanes for existing roadways and the existing intersection controls are identified. Local access is provided by various roadways in the study area. The north- south roadways which will be most affected by the project include Day Creek Boulevard, Etiwanda Avenue, East Avenue, Wardman Bullock Road, and Cherry Avenue. The east-west roadways which will be most affected by the project are Wilson Avenue and Banyan Street. B. Existinq Volumes Figure 3 depicts the existing average daily traffic volumes. The existing average daily traffic volumes were factored from peak hour counts (see Appendix B) obtained by Kunzman Associates using the following formula for each intersection leg: • PM Peak Hour (Approach + Exit Volume) x 11.5 =Daily Leg Volume. This is a conservative estimate and may over estimate the average daily traffic volumes. Existing intersection traffic conditions were established through morning and evening peak hour traffic counts obtained by Kunzman Associates from December 2006 (see Appendix B) and shown on Figures 4 and 5, respectively. Explicit peak hour factors have been calculated using the data collected for this effort as well. The morning and evening peak hour traffic volumes were identified by counting the two-hour periods from 7:00 AM - 9:00 AM and 4:00 PM - 6:00 PM. C. Existinq Level of Service The existing delay and Level of Service for intersections in the vicinity of the project are shown in Table 1. The study area intersections currently operate at Level of Service D or better during the peak hours for existing traffic conditions, except for the fallowing study area intersection that currently operates at Level of Service E during the evening peak hour: • Wardman Bullock Road (NS) at: Wilson Avenue (EW) Existing delay worksheets are provided in Appendix D. s • D. Existing Traffic Signal Warrant A traffic signal appears to currently be warranted at the following study area intersection for existing traffic conditions (see Appendix E): Wardman Bullock Road (NS) at: Wilson Avenue (EW) The unsignalized intersections have been evaluated for traffic signals using the California Department of Transportation Warrant 3 Peak Hour traffic signal warrant analysis, as specified in the Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devises 2003 California Supplement, dated May 20, 2004. E. Planned Transportation Improvements and Relationship to General Plan The City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Circulation Element is shown on Figure 6. The City of Rancho Cucamonga typical roadway cross-sections are shown on Figures 7 and 8. • •' Table 1 Existing Intersection Delay and Level of Service • Intersection A roach Lanes' ~ Peak Hour Traffic Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Dela -LOSS Intersection Controla L T R L T R L T R L T R Morning Evening Day Creek Boulevard (NS) at: Wilson Avenue EW TS 1 2 1 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 22.8-C 16.5-B Etiwanda Avenue-North Leg (NS) at: Wilson Avenue EW AWS 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 2 0 0 2 0 7.7-A 7.5-A Etiwanda Avenue-South Leg (NS) at: W ikon Avenue EW CSS 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0.0-A 0.0-A Wardman Bullock Road (NS) at: Wilson Avenue EW AWS 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 10.3-B 48.3-E Cherry Avenue (NS) at: Wilson Avenue (EW) TS 7 1 1 7 1 1 1 2 0 7 2 0 39.9-D 37.9-D ' When a fight turn is designated, the lane can edher be striped or unstripetl. To function as a right wrn lane there must be sufficient vddth for right turning vehicles to navel outside the through lanes. L = Left; T = Through; R =Right ' Delay and level of service cakulatetl using the folbwing analysis software: Traffx, Version 7.8.0115 (2006). Per the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual, overall average intersection delay and level of service are shown for intersections with traffm signal or all way stop control. Far intersections whh cross • street stop control. Ne delaY and level of service for [he worst intlividual movement (or movements sharing a single lane) are shown. ' TS =Traffic Signal; AW S =All Way Stop; CSS =Cross Street Stop • u Figure 2 Existing Through Trave l Lanes and Intersection Controls Wardman Bullock Etiwanda ~ Road Avenue ~ 2U 4D 4U 4D ~ r ~ ' $ 5 4D 6 ~ Summit $ 3 ,¢ Wilson Avenue-__ ---_-- Avenue 4U ~ ~ .4D -------- ------_ 40 a `o L 2D > > ° 4D x o ~ 2u c ~ o ~ 4U m 2U v U o ; w `V O O W U Legend Q = Traffic Signal 0$ =All Way Stop 4 =Through Travel Lanes D =Divided U =Undivided ----- = Dirt Kvnzman Assocti¢tes Intersection reference numbers are in upper left comer of turning movement boxes. 3633/2 I `zp P ~0 3 ~° 4 4-0 5 °-1 6 `~0 ddb a-z , dbb a-z ~o ~bb ~o ~° dbb a--o s-o a~bb a-o ~l dbb ~s sl I~ %YP '- %Y~° °s %YP °-Q %YP °-s %YP I-' %Y~° 2~ -~- 2-D o a-o -== °~ _ °-s ~-- z~ - °~ o-a i-a o~, o~ o-b 9 • • Figure 3 Existing Average Daily Traffic Volumes Wardman Bullock Etiwando ~ Rood Avenue , 14.2 r r 1.5 2.3 0.7 ~ Wilson Avenue - ------------ Su mit -_ Avenue --- 1 3 ------- 8.7 10.6 12.7 0.3 ~ . 2.7 o ,~ m - ° 4.9 < 1.7 < 1.7 9.2 -. o " 9 5 ~ o a - "~ . p O W L U Legend 9.5 =Vehicles Per Day (100D's) Kunzman Associates 3633/3 10 I • Figure 4 Existing Morning Peak Hour Intersection Turning Movement Volumes Etiwanda t t t t4 Wilson Avenue 5 ;i 498 ~ 78 0 0 0 0 0 39 0 523 0 1 R a X62 ~3 a `~ 2 ~ o ~ ^15 d-24 .°; J ~p 4-0 e 4 Qp 4-0 o f "' 'L24 d-0 w 6 B °' ~ X497 4-257 -' m dbb st62 a db4 sp a dbb .~o a dbb so a dbb s-n+ a dbb .~6s a D 193 ~ ~ ~ D 27s ~ ~ ~ D 0~ ~ ~ ~ D Os ~ y ~ D ps ~ ~ ~ D 96 -' 15--0 ,~~„~~ 19~ ~ 0-D e;== O--D = 0~ =e~ "' 197--0 a~_ 19- w 0~ 61~ 0 e 0~ 69~ a , 0 ~ 607 n 573 0 Kvnzman Assoetiates Intersection reference numbers are in upper left corner of turning movement boxes. 3633/bbas 11 Wardman Bullock • • Figure 5 Existing Evening Peak Hour intersection Turning Movement Volumes Wardman Bullock Etiwandc Road Avenue , 1 1 1 1 4 Wilson 5 Avenue Summit 3 1 ___ Avenue 2 °' o m > < < ~ y 9 ~ v U C 0 i - W ~ a`~ L p W U O Kvnzman Associates Intersection reference numbers are in upper left corner of turning movement boxes. 3633~bbos 1R5~ iBo °o °~ 75> B73o 1 4-6 ,~ Z X71 `i 3 2° 4 ap o 5 ~3p " 6 n~ e '166 3 dbb 4-2 a-n a ~Ab X31 b-o a db4 4-0 ~o a dbb ~° .~o a - dbb ~° s++3 a o~A~e X178 sfos a ° t~ hYl° ° 7zs °I~I° ~ °9 °IYI° ° °' OIYI° " °' %~'I° ° ~~' dlil° m ama 3s~ o B~ ~oo B-c p °-o o~~ 263~ mgg +~ - o~ 3+-a o~ o~, t+6~, zs7 ° +z ° ~ 96 ~ 236 12 Figure 6 City of Roncho Cucamonga General Plan Circulation Element E ~~ ~ ~ E r r ~~ I s -- x r i _. LI I ~..~..:.........._....... -~~ - I ... ~ ~ ~ ~ • 1 f ~ ~ ~ I ~ - i 4 j i ;~ ~ u x ~~ _~ ,r._1__a r _ i r ~~ ~ ~'F- I i l i ~ ~ Q_+ _ i I t 1 ~~ I G~" i, k y~.~ ,. ~.,._.- s i j ~ ~~ q~,~=uL:c uL, {1.~ ? - .:. ~.~ i Vin,, ,,,4-~.~+, .c t:.e=r. r ff`,a L '.qtr' F;3 ~T: ~11J t ~ , ~iY.,ii F C ~ .MT ~.~m~ei. st. `.~; ~-oi:e~w~a+~ m~lr~dl~am .rM."~f'1_~~~.- '~yrrs?~1, ll~l .?i :~:: ''f' ~ ~q JL E1 .~ ~_~ + s~fi)ai FT ~ 0 _. u . it Ri ~ ~ 9 Y ~ _ _ _.~_-- ~-,.µ s ~oh °R °"^~ u 1 „ax ~~ z - w bh d W 4Y W Y Legend ;ter e«,=,~;~ : ~.:.;~_fs '4 iW d:~sd•wll+. c„ '.Kfh Vur,~,~ / i:; ~ frc: r:} l-.~.~hlt~.yp h r y,/ x-r.,tlarp, rJ io~e waa °re¢~.+r.,. l!aerh und:: . i%0diad el+G:ddn-{'rxy^. t.$c:1Atn .F y N4ie: x,; .1~`>/"l~tjz.4r~il .~~. ~.+: sozi'=-~1::eyar.li:rt /~f UO da6tl u'V1W'L+Ifx t~iC61f' Fi~ ^klR~i'u: i.' fulr4i lr.NurJrLlfrfdtl)`-A:H2i ~~ ~~ r•fC94lf}YU~.i;'.rea0Y~t2'f .f ~' ~aj;~r Pv r'n7'?ptix-: ,f kr1 ~;ty LiR.ts -~_ Fry.r3-Dia--l akr, '+`'3rc~'f~hgpnr/ f4+' 'IA^a~rSi~uedf5il crass r+(~~ l:N!IEIJ~4 iJa Y:i:1L1i:LY. Kunzman Assoctiates e r t ~ ^, ~ }j~ Source: City of Rancho Cucamonga 3633/6 13 Figure City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan 60' 36' 17 18'--~-18' 12' i 1 t LOCAL -RESIDENTIAL 66' 44' 11' S'~12' S-r5' 125' 11' Bike 1 L-~ t Bike 7 Roadway Crass-Sections (Part 1) 66' 44' it' 22~-22' 11' i 1 t COLLECTOR -RESIDENTIAL & INDUSTRIAL varies varies COLLECTOR -RESIDENTIAL & INDUSTRIAL varies 22' varies 22' varies WITH CLASS II BIKE LANE l10DIFIED COLLECTOR W1TH lAEDIAN ISLAND u • d 1 ~.'~ 1 t r' SECONDARY ARTERIAL Intersection Righi Turn Kunzman Associates Source: City of Rancho Cucamonga 16' (14)' Residential Commercial /Industrial 3633/7 14 1 1 ~.'~ ', t SECONDARY ARTERIAL Fdid-Block Bike ~, d ~~ t t Bike SECONDARY ARTERIAL W11H CLASS II BIKE LANE Noie: Bike IAODIFIED SECONDARY WITH MAEDIAN ISLAND Bike 1 1 `~ '~ i t r ' lAAJOR ARTERIAL (Dual Left Turn Lanes and Righi Turn) 16' Residential (14)' Commercial /Industrial 04 12' 5-7-12~11~10'--~-10'~11~11~y14' 7 Figure 8 City or' Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Roadway Cross-Sections (Part 2) 00' 7r -14' S~14~12; 5'~--5' 12~14'~5' 14' (13') (12) (s'); s') (1z') (13') Bike ~ + (-~ t tAAJOR ARTERIAL IAid-Block 103' 78' 6'~ 14'~ 13'~ 7'rt- 7 ~ 13' ~14 Bike MODIFIED k1AJOR W17H lAEDIAN ISLAND u 112' T 5'~11'~11~13' 4' 10' C~L 11' 11' 11' 11~14L Bike 1 1 IAAJOR DIVDED ARTERIAL (Dual Left Turn Lanes and Right Turn Lone) • 15 /~~~~ k7AJOR DIVIDED ARTERIAL (4Aid-Block) 126' Bike + 1 i ~ T T T 7 bike k7AJOR DIVDED HIGHWAY (Faid-Block) MAJOR DIVIDED HIGHWAY (Dual Leit lum tones ana mgnc mrn uone~ Kvnzma~, Associates Source: City of Rancho Cucamonga 3633/8 • ii9. Year 2030 Conditions A. Year 2030 Volumes As described within Section I.C, the Year 2030 average daily traffic volume forecasts are developed using a growth increment process based on volumes predicted by the East Valley Traffic Model Year 2000 and Year 2030 traffic models. The growth increment for Year 2030 on each roadway segment is the increase in East Valley Traffic Model volumes from existing Year 2007 to Year 2030. The final Year 2030 roadway segment volume used for analysis purposes is then determined by adding the Year 2030 growth increment volume to the existing counted volume. The average daily traffic volumes for Year 2030 traffic conditions have been determined as described above using the growth increment process (see Section I.C). Year 2030 average daily traffic volumes are shown on Figure 9. B. Year 2030 Level of Service The Year 2030 delay and Level of Service for the study area roadway network are shown in Table 2. Table 2 shows delay values based on the geometries at the study area intersections without and with improvements. • Year 2030 delay calculation worksheets are provided in Appendix D. Year 2030 morning and evening peak hour intersection turning movement volumes are shown on Figures 10 and 11, respectively. For Year 2030 traffic conditions, the study area intersections are projected to operate at Level of Service D or better during the peak hours, with improvements (see Table 2). C. Year 2030 Traffic Signal Warrant Analysis Traffic signals are not projected to be warranted at the following additional study area intersections for Year 2030 traffic conditions (see Appendix E): Etiwanda Avenue-North Leg (NS) at: Wilson Avenue (EW) Etiwanda Avenue-South Leg (NS) at: Wilson Avenue (EW) East Avenue (NS) at: Wilson Avenue (EW) • ~s Table 2 Year 2030 Intersection Delay and Level of Service Intersection A roach Lanes' Peak Hour Traffic Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Dela -LOSa Intersection Control' L T R L T R L T R L T R Morning Evening Day Creek Boulevard (NS) at: Wilson Avenue EW TS 1 2 1 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 23.9-C 16.1-B Etiwanda Avenue-North Leg (NS) at: Wilson Avenue EW AWS 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 2 0 0 2 0 8.3-A 8.2-A Etiwanda Avenue-South Leg (NS) at: Wilson Avenue EW CSS 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 2 0 9.4-A 10.5-B East Avenue (NS) at: Wilson Avenue EW ~ CSS 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 2 0 ~ 2 0 11.0-B 11.9-B Wardman Bullock Road (NS) at: Wilson Avenue (EW) -Without Improvements AWS 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 10.0-B 15.4-C -With Im rovements TS 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 7.6-A 6.6-A Cherry Avenue (NS) at: Wilson Avenue (EW) TS 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 0 1 2 0 36.6-D 36.1-D • When a right turn is designated, [he lane can either be striped or unstriped. To function as a right turn lane there must be suffcient width for right turning vehicles to travel outside dte through lanes. L = Left; T = Through; A =flight; 1 =Improvement ~ Delay and level of service calculatetl using the following analysis soriware: Traffix, Version 7.8,0115 (2006). Per [he 2000 Highway Capacity Manual, overall average intersection delay and level of service are shown for intersections with traffic signal or all way stop control. for intersections wrth cross street stop control, the tlelay and level of service for the worst individual movement (or movements sharing a single lane) are shown. • ' TS=Traffic Sgnal:CSS=Cross Street Stop;AWS=AII Way Stop 17 • • is igw-e 9 Year 2030 Averoge Daily Traffic Volumes Wardman Bullock Etiwando Road Avenue ~ ~ 75.6 ~ 2.3 2 D 2.5 2.6 ~ ~ ~ Wilson Avenue ______~..,..,___--- ~ Su mit Avenue __ '"'~'~~--V 3.5 3 2 10.1 18.4 15.8 0.3 ~ 4.0 6.0 . `o u ° 6.5 < a 3.2 a 4.0 o 7.6 ¢ 11 7 U ~i w . N ° W U 11.7 =Vehicles Per Day (1000's) Kvnzman Associates 3633/9 18 .~ Figure 10 Year 2030 Morning Peak Hour Intersection. Turning Movement Volumes Etiwanda ~¢ Wilsoi 0 ~., • • sa4 ~ 185 ~ o ~ sa ~ 7s o s74 0 1 =102 2 X32 ~ 3 ~° ~ 4 °-II 5 X45 B 6 _ 't475 m ddb ~~z7 a dbb so a db4 ~n' 4 dbb ~'2; 4 dbb s~~ a ~bb s97 ~329 d 0 2os 0IYI° ~ ~~-? °IYA ° °" °IYI° ° '~ %YP ° 1~ °IgA > 188~ 0IYI° 18--0 a~~ 91~ = 125-D m~~ 78-b -aA 152~ ~,+„^ 440 -D ~,m_ - ??-z 0~ 37-3 i~ 3~ 181-3 , n 511 0 49 ~ 6 6 Kvnzman Associates Intersection reference numbers are in upper left comer of taming movement boxes. 3633/bbas 19 W°rdmon Bullock • • Figure 11 Year 2030 Evening Peak Hour Intersection Turning Movement Volumes Etiwanda t I t t '4 wi5 0 w Wardmon Bullock 110 B0~ 0~ 770 170 9230 7 28 2 `z-12 ~ 1 ~ 20 ~ 4 ~~ - 5 °-50 F "' 6 q .., m 2161 ti' ~° dbb sits a `" ~ a~bb 4-97 so 4 dbb x-110 st2 ~ a dbb 4-76 ~11 4 -~ dbb 4-113 .~3fi< a a~bb 4-390 ~-12s 4 D 1~ 41 ~ (D D ]sue 41 y ~ C Os ~ y ID D 6~ 41 ~ ID E 19 4i ~ ID G 114= ~ I ID 2~ mo-_. 118 ° 727~ ,+p°X 120~ ~m,+„ " 180--0 a„^,~ 379--0 =^,~ fi -" 0 19~ J-a. 71~ 231 ~ ~ ~ 1 B ~ 98 J92 431 0 ~ 11B Kvnzman Associates Intersection reference numbers are in upper left corner of turning movement boxes. 3633/bbos 20 IV. Conclusions and Recommendations • A. Summary The City of Rancho Cucamonga is the lead agency responsible for preparation of the traffic impact analysis. This report analyzes traffic impacts for the Year 2030. The average daily traffic volume forecasts have been determined using the growth increment approach on the East Valley Traffic Model Year 2000 and Year 2030 average daily traffic volume forecasts (see Appendix C). This difference defines the growth in traffic over the 30-year period. The incremental growth in average daily traffic volume has been factored to reflect the forecast growth between Year 2007 and Year 2030. For this purpose, linear growth between the Year 2000 base condition and the forecast Year 2030 condition was assumed. Since the increment between Year 2007 and Year 2030 is 23 years of the 30-year time frame, a factor of 0.77 (i.e., 23/30) was used. The Year 2030 daily and peak hour directional roadway segment volume forecasts have been determined using the growth increment approach on the East Valley Traffic Model Year 2000 and Year 2030 peak hour volumes. The • growth increment.calculation worksheets are shown in Appendix C. Current peak hour intersection approach/departure data is a necessary input to this approach. The existing traffic count data serves as both the starling point for the refinement process, and also provides important insight into current travel patterns and the relationship between peak hour and daily traffic conditions. The initial turning movement proportions are estimated based upon the relationship of each approach leg's forecast traffic volume to the other legs forecast volumes at the intersection. The initial estimate of turning movement proportions is then entered into a spreadsheet program consistent with the National Cooperative Highway Research Program Report 255. A linear programming algorithm is used to calculate individual turning movements that match the known directional roadway segment volumes computed in the previous step. This program computes a likely set of intersection turning movements from intersection approach counts and the .initial turning proportions from each approach leg. Quality control checks and forecast adjustments were performed as necessary to ensure that all future traffic volume forecasts reflect a minimum of 10% growth over existing traffic volumes. The result of this traffic forecasting procedure is a series of traffic volumes suitable for traffic operations analysis. n LJ 21 B. Existing Conditions • Local access is provided by various roadways in the study area. The north- . south roadways which will be most affected by the project include Day Creek Boulevard, Etiwanda Avenue, East Avenue, Wardman Bullock Road, and Cherry Avenue. The east-west roadways which will be most affected by the project include Wilson Avenue and Banyan Street. The study area intersections currently operate at Level of Service D or better during the peak hours for existing traffic conditions, except for the following study area intersection that currently operates at Level of Service E during the evening peak hour: Wardman Bullock Road (NS) at: Wilson Avenue (EW) A traffic signal appears to currently be warranted at the following study area intersection for existing traffic conditions (see Appendix E): Wardman Bullock Road (NS) at: Wilson Avenue (EW) The unsignalized intersections have been evaluated for traffic signals using • the California Department of Transportation Warrant 3 Peak Hour traffic signal warrant analysis, as specified in the Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devises 2003 California Supplement, dated May 20, 2004. C. Future Conditions For Year 2030 traffic conditions, the study area intersections are projected to operate at Level of Service D or better during the peak hours, with improvements (see Table 2). Traffic signals are not projected to be warranted at the following additional study area intersections for Year 2030 traffic conditions (see Appendix E): Etiwanda Avenue-North Leg (NS) at: Wilson Avenue (EW) Etiwanda Avenue-South Leg (NS) at: Wilson Avenue (EW) East Avenue (NS) at: Wilson Avenue (EW) • 22 D. Conclusions • The traffic study includes information that the Federal Highway Administration and the California Department of Transportation requires for Federal funding through the State Transportation Improvement Program. Wilson Avenue will eventually be a continuous route. Today, there is a gap or missing link in its mid-section. Wilson Avenue completes a local and circulation link in the City's General Plan. Wilson Avenue is currently discontinuous between Etiwanda Avenue and Wardman Bullock Road. This is a gap of approximately 1.25 miles in approximately the mid-section of the 3 mile route. Wilson Avenue is located parallel to and approximately 1 mile north of the I-210 Freeway. Wilson Avenue will serve to shorten local trips that are currently not provided with a continuous east-west corridor. E. Recommendations Site-specific circulation and access recommendations are depicted on Figure 12. Construct Wilson- Avenue from Etiwanda Avenue to Wardman Bullock Road as a Modified Major with Median including landscaping and parkway • improvements. Sight distance at each study area intersection should be reviewed with respect to California Department of Transportation/City of Rancho Cucamonga standards in conjunction with the preparation of Tina! grading, landscaping, and street improvement plans. Traffic signing and striping should be implemented in conjunction with detailed construction plans for the project. As . is the case for any roadway design, the City of Rancho Cucamonga should periodically review traffic operations in the vicinity.of the project once the project is constructed to assure that the traffic operations are satisfactory. • 23 • u Figure 12 Circulation Recommendations Construct Wilson Avenue from Etiwanda Avenue to Wardman Bullock Road as a Modified Major with Median including landscaping and parkway improvements. Wordman Bullock Etiwanda Road Avenue , r r a ~ OSummit -__ Wilson Avenue ~ ---- Avenue o STC4 SiC7 d N m ~ ~ ¢ Q y j Y O p ~ C Q y U O O W ~ p 0 W U Legend Q = Traffc Signal . O= All Way Stop sTOa= Stop Sign Sight distance at each study area intersection should be reviewed with respect to California Department of Transportation/City of Rancho Cucamonga standards in conjunction with preparation of final grading, landscaping, and street improvementlandscaping, street improvement plans Traffic signing and striping should be implemented in conjunction with detailed construction pions for the project. As is the case for ony roadway design, the City of Rancho Cucamonga should periodically review operations in the vicinity of the project once the project is constructed to assure that the traffc operations are satisfactory. K1G7LZ7It(176 ASSCC7,CLt2S 3633/12 24 ,• Appendices Appendix A -Glossary of Transportation Terms Appendix B -Traffic Count Worksheets Appendix C -Future Growth Increment Calculation Worksheets Appendix D -Explanation and Calculation of Intersection Delay Appendix E -Traffic Signal Warrant Worksheets ,~ APPENDIX A • Glossary of Transportation Terms • GLOSSARY OF TRANSPORTATION TERMS COMMON ABBREVIATIONS AC: ADT: Caltrans: DU: ICU: LOS: TS F: V/C: VMT: TERMS Acres Average Daily Traffic California Department of Transportation Dwelling Unit Intersection Capacity Utilization Level of Service Thousand Square Feet Volume/Capacity Vehicle Miles Traveled AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: The total volume during a year divided by the number of days in a year. Usually only weekdays are included. U BANDWIDTH: The number of seconds of green time available for through traffic in a signal progression. BOTTLENECK: A constriction along a travelway that limits the amount of traffic that can proceed downstream from its location. CAPACITY: The maximum number of vehicles that can be reasonably expected to pass over a given section of a lane or a roadway ih a given time period. CHANNELIZATION: The separation or regulation of conflicting traffic movements into definite paths of travel by the use of pavement markings, raised islands, or other suitable means to facilitate the safe and drderly movements of both vehicles and pedestrians. CLEARANCE INTERVAL: Nearly same as yellow time. If there is an all red interval after the end of a yellow, then that is also added into the clearance interval. CORDON: An imaginary line around an area across which vehicles, persons, or other items are counted (in and out). • CYCLE LENGTH: The time period in seconds required for one complete signal cycle. CUL-DE-SAC STREET: A local street open at one end only, and with special provisions for turning around. DAILY CAPACITY: The daily volume of traffic that will result in a volume during the peak hour equal to the capacity of the roadway. DELAY: The time consumed while traffic is impeded in its movement by some element over which it has no control, usually expressed in seconds per vehicle. DEMAND RESPONSIVE SIGNAL: Same as traffic-actuated signal. DENSITY: The number of vehicles occupying in a unit length of the through traffic lanes of a roadway at any given instant. Usually expressed in vehicles per mile. DETECTOR: A device that responds to a physical stimulus and transmits a resulting impulse to the signal controller. C~ • DESIGN SPEED: A speed selected for purposes of design. Features of a highway, such as curvature, superelevation, and sight distance (upon which the safe operation of vehicles is dependent) are correlated to design speed. DIRECTIONAL SPLIT: The percent of traffic in the peak direction at any point in time. DIVERSION: The rerouting of peak hour traffic to avoid congestion. FORCED FLOW: Opposite of free flow. FREE FLOW: Volumes are well below capacity. Vehicles can maneuver freely and travel is unimpeded by other traffic. GAP: Time or distance between successive vehicles in a traffic stream, rear bumper to front bumper. HEADWAY: Time or distance spacing between successive vehicles in a traffic stream, front bumper to front bumper. INTERCONNECTED SIGNAL SYSTEM: A number of intersections that are connected to achieve signal progression. LEVEL OF SERVICE: A qualitative measure of a number of factors, which include speed and travel time, traffic interruptions, freedom to maneuver, safety; driving comfort and convenience, and operating costs. LOOP DETECTOR: A vehicle detector consisting of a loop of wire embedded in the roadway, energized by alternating current and producing an output circuit closure when passed over by a vehicle. MINIMUM ACCEPTABLE GAP: Smallest time headway between successive vehicles in a traffic stream into which another vehicle is willing and able to cross or merge. MULTI-MODAL: More than one mode; such as automobile, bus transit, rail rapid transit, and bicycle transportation modes. OFFSET: The time interval in seconds between the beginning of green at one intersection and the beginning of green at an adjacent intersection. L J PLATOON: A closely grouped component of traffic that is composed of several vehicles moving, or standing ready to move, with clear spaces ahead and behind. ORIGIN-DESTINATION SURVEY: A survey to determine the point of origin and the point of destination for a given vehicle trip. PASSENGER CAR EQUIVALENTS (PCE): One car is one Passenger Car Equivalent. A truck is equal to 2 or 3 Passenger Car Equivalents in that a truck requires longer to start, goes slower, and accelerates slower. Loaded trucks have a higher Passenger Car Equivalent than empty trucks. PEAK HOUR: The 60 consecutive minutes with the highest number of vehicles. PRETIMED SIGNAL: A type of traffic signal that directs traffic to stop and go on a predetermined time schedule without regard to traffic conditions. Also, fixed time signal. PROGRESSION: A term used to describe the progressive movement of traffic through several signalized intersections. •' SCREEN-LINE: An imaginary line or physical feature across which all trips are counted, normally to verify the validity of mathematical traffic models. SIGNAL CYCLE: The time period in seconds required for one complete sequence of signal indications. SIGNAL PHASE: The part of the signal cycle allocated to one or more traffic movements. STARTING DELAY: The delay experienced in initiating the movement of queued traffic from a stop to an average running speed through a signalized intersection. TRAFFIC-ACTUATED SIGNAL: A type of traffic signal that directs traffic to stop and go in accordance with the demands of traffic, as registered by the actuation of detectors. • TRIP: The movement of a person dr vehicle from one location (origin) to another (destination). For example, from home to store to home is two trips, not one. TRIP-END: One end of a trip at either the origin or destination; i.e. each trip has two trip-ends. A trip-end occurs when a person, object, or message is transferred to or from a vehicle. TRIP GENERATION RATE: The quality of trips produced and/or attracted by a specific land use stated in terms of units such as per dwelling, per acre, and per 1,000 square feet of floor space. TRUCK: A vehicle having dual tires on one or more axles, or having more than two axles. UNBALANCED FLOW: Heavier traffic flow in one direction than the other. On a daily basis, most facilities have balanced flow. During the peak hours, flow is seldom balanced in an urban area. VEI•iICLE MILES OF TRAVEL: A measure of the amount of usage of a section of highway, obtained by multiplying the average daily traffic by length of facility in miles. ,~ APPENDIX B 'traffic Count Worksheets • 6 45 Start lime-15 MINUTES • • .SOUTHLA/VD CAR COU/VTERS Axle Count - Project ~ 06-3501-OOlAxI Location: Day Creek Blvd. & W ilson Ave. City: runcno Cuwmon9a Date: 12/19/2006 Day: TUESDAY t 2 0 NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL Wt WR 7:00 CARS 2 47 14 5 26 0 0 0 2 37 0 it 2-axle 3 1 3-axle 1 1 4-axle 5-axle + 1 1 7:15 CARS 2 59 11 3 38 0 0 0 5 35 2 13 2-axle 3 1 4 3-axle 4-axle 1 5-axle + 1 1 7:30 CARS 8 127 12 22 122 0 B 2 4 44 1 23 2-axle 6 2 3-axle 4-axle 5-axle + 1 1 7:45 CARS 7 167 19 53 149 3 11 8 3 69 0 20 2-axle 5 1 3 1 3-axle 1 4-axle 5-axle + 2 1 8:00 CARS 8 41 19 18 52 2 0 5 5 31 0 3 2-axle 2 1 1 3-axle L 4-axle 1 5-axle + 2 1 8:15 CARS 1 21 10 1 16 0 0 0 0 13 0 1 2-axle 3 1 1 3-axle 2 4-axle 5-axle + 1 2 8:30 CARS - 1 20 I1 0 21 0 0 0 3 22 0 0 2-axle 1 L 3-axle 2 1 4-axle 5-axle + 8:45 CARS 1 21 18 2 35 0 0 0 3 23 0 2 2-axle 2 3-axle 1 4-axle 1 5-axle + M(l\/FMFNT Tf1TAl C CARS 30 503 114 104 458 5 19 15 26 274 3 73 2-axle 0 23 3 1 12 0 0 0 1 2 0 1 3-axle 0 6 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4-axle 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5-axle + 0 7 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 TOTALS 30 539 117 105 484 5 19 15 26 276 3 76 • ~ PM Peak Hr Begins at: PEAK VOLUMES =. PEAK HR. FACTOR: CONTROL: Signalized NL NT NK bL ar ~rc cc ci ~n ~~~ ~•• ••~• 715 AM 25 414 64 1 6 1 97 60 6 16 181 19 0.623 os78 0 78 0 91 35 95 Start Time -15 hiIIJUTES • • SOUTHLAND CAR COU/VTERS Axle Count Project # 06-3501-OOlAzI Location; Day Creek Bivd. & Wilson Ave. City: Rancho caramonga Date: 12/19/2006 I nnloc. ~ ~ ~ i i ~ 0 1 2 0 Day: TUESDAY 1 2 0 NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR 16:00 CARS 5 9 16 1 13 0 0 2 1 3 1 2 2-axle 1 2 3-axle 1 4-axle 5-axle + 16:15 CARS 6 13 29 3 27 0 0 3 3 5 1 1 2-axle 1 2 3-axle 2 4-axle 5-axle + 16:30 CARS 3 10 27 4 19 0 0 2 2 7 2 1 2-axle 1 2 1 3-axle 4-axle 5-axle + 16:45 CARS 7 11 32 4 13 0 0 3 2 7 1 1 2-axle 1 3-axle 4-axle 5-axle + 17:00 CARS S 33 29 S 20' 0 0 0 0 16 0 1 2-axle 1 3-axle 4-axle 5-axle + 17:15 CARS 7 23 4D 1 34 0 0 1 2 19 1 2 2-axle 3-axle 4-axle 5-axle + 17:30 CARS 3 18 40 1 15 0 0 0 2 22 0 0 2-axle 1 Z 3-axle 4-axle 5-axle + 17:45 CARS 6 15 38 3 20 0 1 0 0 9 1 3 2-axle 1 1 3-axle 4-axle 5-axle + nnCaT T(1Tn I C CARS 42 132 251 22 161 0 1 11 12 68 7 11 2-axle 0 4 0 0 9 0 0 0 1 3 0 0 3-axle 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4-axle 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6-axle + 0~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTALS 42 136 Z61 22 173 0 1 11 13 91 7 11 • PM Peak Hr Begins at: PEAK VOLUMES = PEAK HR. FACTOR: CONTROL: Signalized NL Nl NK JL J/ ~n cc ~r ~~ ..~ .., .... 1700 PM 21 89 147 I 10 0729 D 11 OS00 4 I 69 0 802 6 o.91s 6 45 Start Tme -15 MINUSES • • SOUTHLAIVD CAR COUNTERS Axle Count Project # 06-3501-002Ax1 Location: Etiwanda Ave. & Wilson Ave. Gty: Rznrtw [uramo~ga Date: 12/19/2006 I ANFG n (1 0 1 0 1 1 1 D Day: TUESDAY o z D NL M NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR 7:00 CARS 0 0 0 3 0 6 3 3 0 0 2 1 2-axle 1 3 3-axle 4-axle 5-axle + 7:15 CARS 0 0 0 6 0 13 6 1 0 0 6 0 2-axle 1 1 1 3-axle 1 4azle 5-axle + 7:30 CARS 0 0 0 4 0 11 4 2 0 0 4 1 2-axle 2 1 1 1 3-axle 1 1 4-axle 5-axle + 7:45 CARS 0 0 0 6 0 9 5 4 0 0 2 2 2-axle 1 1 - 1 1 3-axle 4-axle 5-axle + 8:00 CARS 0 0 0 7 0 8 6 10 0 0 6 5 2-axle 3 1 1 1 3-axle 4-axle 5-axle + 8:15 CARS 0 0 0 S 0 2 4 2 0 0 1 3 2-axle 2 1 1 2 3-axle 1 4-axle 1 5-axle + 8:30 CARS 0 0 0 4 0 7 4 6 0 0 4 2 2-axle 2 1 3-axle 1 4-axle 5-axle + 6:45 CARS 0 0 0 2 0 5 2 4 0 0 3 3 2-axle 1 1 1 2 3-axle 4-axle 5-axle + M!1\/FMFNT Tl1TG C CARS 0 0 0 37 0 61 34 32 0 0 26 17 2-axle 0 0 0 it 0 6 1 3 0 0 7 8 3-axle 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 2 4-axle 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 S-axle+ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTALS 0 0 0 48 0 68 37 36 0 0 35 27 • NL N7 NK SL J/ JK [~ ri rrt vv~ vvi vvn PM Peak Hr Begins at: 715 AM PEAK PEAK HR. FA~Ci0R5 ( 0 0.a0o 0 I 29 x913 ~ 124 0.83 0 I 0 0.700 12 CONTROL: 3-Way Stop N, 5 0 w 15 45 Bart Time-15 MINUTES • SOUTHLAND CAR COUNTERS Axle Count Project # 06-3501-002Ax1 Locatlon: Etiwanda Ave. & Wllson Ave. City: aaMro Cummoya Date: 12/19/2006 Day: TUESDAY i auEC~ n n n t 0 1 1 1 0 0 2 D u NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT, WR 16:00 GARS 0 D 0 0 0 3 7 10 0 D 13 2 2-axle 0 3-axle 4-axle 5-axle + 16:15 CARS 0 0 0 2 0 2 8 6 0 0 7 0 2-axle 3-axle 4-axle 5-axle + 16:30 CARS 0 0 0 D 0~ 4 9 11 D 0 5 1 2-axle 2 3-axle 1 9-axle 5-axle + 16:45 CARS 0 0 0 0 0 3 11 7 0 0 5 2 2-axle 3-axle 4-axle 5-axle + 17:00 CARS 0 0 0 0 0 5 8 6 0 0 10 2 2-axle 0 3-axle 4-axle 5-axle + 17:15 CARS 0 0 0 0 0 2 7 7 0 0 6 4 2-axle 3-axle 4-axle 5-axle + 17:30 CARS 0 0 0 0 0 6 6 12 0 0 10 3 2-axle 1 3-axle 4-axle 5-axle + 17:45 CARS 0 0 0 0 0 3 6 9 0 0 4 6 2-axle 3-axle 4-axle 5-axle + MOVEMENT TOTALS CARS 0 0 0 2 0 ZB 62 66 0 0 60 20 2-axle 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 D 3-axle 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 4-axle 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5-axle + 0 0~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTALS 0 0 0 2 0 28 62 68 4 0 60 20 NL NT NR SL S/ SK CL c/ crc vv~ vv~ ...~ • PM Peak Hr Begins at: 1700 PM PEAK VOLUMES = I O 0 O 12 0 16 132 34 1 0 31 15 PEAK HR. FACTOR: 0.000 0.667 0.855 0.865 CONTROL: 3-way smP N, S a w • • • 6 45 Start Tlme-IS MINUTES SOUTHLAND CAR COUNTERS Axle Count Project # 06-3501-006Az1 Location: Bullock Rd. 3 Wilson St. City: aanUo [ucartwn9a Date: 12/19/2006 i nniFC• n i n n t 0 0 0 0 Day: TUESDAY 1 0 1 NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR 7:00 CARS 0 15 53 3 11 0 0 0 0 24 0 S 2-axle 1 4 1 3 15 1 3-axle 4-axle 5-axle + 1 1 7:15 CARS 0 14 46 3 6 0 0 0 0 40 0 5 2-axle 3 2 3 2 3-axle 4-axle 5-axle + 2 7:30 CARS 0 19 52 3 3 0 0 0 0 27 0 4 2-axle 3 4 1 3-axle 4-axle 5-axle + 1 7:45 CARS 0 6 47 3 2 1 0 0 0 32 0 3 2-axle 6 4 1 3-axle 4-axle 5-axle + 1 0:00 CARS 0 17 70 4 7 0 0 0 0 22 0 4 2-axle 1 3 1 1 8 1 3-axle 4-axle 2 5-axle + 1 2 0:15 CARS 0 13 64 S 3 0 0 0 0 23 0 5 2-axle 1 1 B 3-axle 4-axle 5-axle + 1 6:30 CARS 0 9 48 4 4 0 0 0 0 32 0 3 2-axle 2 3 3-axle 4-azle 1 5-axle + 1 6:45 CARS 0 9 45 1 5 0 0 0 0 34 0 4 2-axle 1 1 3-axle 1 4-axle 5-axle + 1 2 Mrl\/FMFAIT TllTdl C CARS 0 104 427 26 41 1 0 0 0 234 0 33 2-axle D 2 23 2 7 0 0 0 0 0 46 6 3-axle D 0 1 0 0 0 0- 0 0 0 0 0 4-axle 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 5-axle + 0 0 S 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 TOTALS 0 106 456 26 46 1 0 0 0 234 57 40 NL Nl NK SL Jl JR ct ci crt vv~ rvi vv.. PM Peak Hr Begins at: 715 AM _ PEAK FAOCiORS I O 0 93 233 I 14 0. 9z 1 I O 0000 0 1121 o.a 3 21 PEAK HR. CO(VTROL: 3-Way Stop N, 5 & W 15 45 Start Tme-IS MINUTES • SOUTHLAND CAR COUNTERS Axle Count Project #. 06-3501-006Ax1 Location: Bullock Rd, & Wllson St. City: Rancno Cucamonga Date: 12/19/2006 Day: TUESDAY i nniFC• n i n n t n n 0 0 1 0 1 • NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR 16:00 CARS 0 4 20 7 7 0 0 0 0 102 0 12 2-axle 2 3-axle 1 4-axle 5-axle + 6 6 16:15 CARS 0 8 78 4 20 0 0 0 0 144 0 4 2-axle 1 3-axle 4-axle 5-axle + 1 3 16:30 CARS 0 10 66 1 22 0 0 0 0 101 0 8 2-axle 3-axle 1 4-axle 5-axle + 4 1 16:45 G1RS 0 3 48 2 10 0 0 0 0 60 0 6 2-axle 1 4 1 3-axle 4 axle S-axle + 3 2 17:00 CARS 0 4 52 3 4 0 0 0 0 61 0 6 2-axle 3 3-axle 4-axle 5-axle + 17:15 CARS 0 2 39 6 23 0 0 0 0 110 0 6 2-axle 3-axle 4-axle 5-axle + 2 1 17:30 CARS 0 12 68 1 7 0 0 0 0 49 0 1 2-axle 3 3-axle 4-axle 5-axle + 17:45 CARS 0 5 32 0 10 0 0 0 0 30 1 1 2-axle 1 3-axle 4-axle S-axle + 1 Ml7VFM FNT TOTAI S CARS 0 48 403 24 103 0 0 0 0 657 1 44 2-axle 0 1~ 10 0 1 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 3-axle 0 0 Z 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4-axle 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 5-axle + 0 0 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 0 0 TOTALS 0 49 432 24 104 0 0 0 0 674 1 44 NL NT NR SL 5 / SK tL t/ cn vvt vv i vvrc • PM Peak Hr Begins at: 1600 PM PEAK FAOCTORS I 0 0.741 235 I 14 0601 0 ( 0 0000 0 1419 0043 30 PEAK HR. CONTROL: 3-Way Stop N, S & W 6 45 Start Time-15 MINUTES • • SOUTHLAIVD CAR COU!{ITERS Ax/e Count Project # 06-3501-007Ax1 Locahon: Cherry Ave.&Wilson St. City: Ra~clto Cur~monaa Date: 12/19/2006 I ANFO 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 J 0 Day: TUESDAY 1 J 0 NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR 7:0D CARS 16 57 23 48 53 6 11 4S 21 26 38 B1 2-axle 2 3 1 2 3 7 2 1 1 6 3 3-axle 1 4-axle 5-axle + 1 1 7:15 CARS 19 78 19 63 36 7 18 49 19 11 50 96 2-axle 1 3 Z 2 3 3 3-axle 4-axle 5-axle + 1 3 1 1 1 7:30 CARS 16 67 24 64 56 14 18 4Z 16 12 49 94 2-axle 2 3 2 2 2 1 3-axle 4-axle S-axle+ 1 1 2 7:45 CARS 24 90 34 71 46 8 17 48 15 19 53 93 2-axle 1 1 1 2 1 1 3 1 3-axle 4-axle 5-axle + 1 2 6:00 CARS 16 99 30 66 43 7 23 58 9 9 47 122 2-axle 1 3 2 1~ 2 2 1 1 ~ 3 3 3-axle 4-axle 1 5-axle + 1 1 1 3 8:15 CARS 23 88 28 70 46 8 22 S1 11 11 53 101 2-axle 2 1 2 1 1 3 1 6 4 3-axle 4-axle 5-axle + 1 1 8:30 CARS 26 64 - 26 72 50 S 28 44 21 22 SS 120 2-axle 1 1- 1 1 2 2 4 3-axle 4-axle 1 1 5-axle + 1 8:45 CARS 26 106 25 72 42 11 20 34 15 11 59 127 2-axle 2 3 1 1 '2 3 3-axle 1 1 ~ 1 4-axle 5-axle + 1 1 2 1 Mf1VFMFNT Tr1TAl C CARS 168 669 209 6Z6 371 66 1S7 371 127 121 407 834 2-axle 7 10 11 8 B 16 6 7 1 9 27 22 3-axle 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 4-axle 0 0 0 1 0 D 0 0 0 0 1 1 S-axle + 1 0 3 0 1 3 0 4 3 5 9 1 TOTALS 176 660 223 S36 380 85 163 363 131 135 445 859 PM Peak Hr Begins at: PEAK VOLUMES = PEAK HR. FACTOR: CONTROL: Signalized NL NT NR SZ 5/- SK tL tl trc wt wl wrc 600 AM 96 383 115 286 167 37 1 95 191 57 59 237 486 0.926 0.961 0.903 0.935 15 h5 Start Tme -15 MINUTES • • SOUTHLAND C.4R COUNTERS Axle Count Project # 06-3501-007Ax1 Location: Cherry Ave. & Wilson SL City: ammo cuomonga Date: 12/19/2006 I dNFG 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 J 0 Ddy: TUESDAY t z n NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR 16:00 CARS 18 18 5 82 64 55 6 39 29 20 47 42 2-axle 2 1 1 2 1 3-axle 4-axle S-axle + 4 Z 4 16:15 CARS 19 26 12 93 83 54 24 71 37 28 60 50 2-axle 1 2 2 1 2 2 1 2 3-axle 1 1 4-axle S-axle + 2 1 3 1 2 16:30 CARS 9 18 9 90 113 44 39 62 31 26 38 36 2-axle 1 3 1 1 1 1 3-axle 4-axle 5-axle + 1 16:45 CARS 16 35 8 94 70 20 17 55 28 29 25 34 2-axle 1 1 3-axle 4-axle 5-axle + 1 2 17:00 CARS 14 26 11 71 49 17 23 47 16 15 40 47 2-axle 1 1 2 3-axle 4-axle 5-axle + 3 1 4 17:15 CARS 21 29 8 109 76 19 12 61 18 12 56 35 2-axle 1 Z 1 1 1 3-axle 4-axle 5-axle + 1 1 1 17:30 CARS 14 32 4 103 90 10 11 86 23 8 33 43 2-axle 1 1 1 2 1 1 3-axle 4-axle 5-axle + 2 17:45 CARS 14 24 8 61 59 7 2 57 19 11 20 41 2-axle ~ 1 1 1 1 2 3-axle 4-axle 5-axle + 3 1 M(1VFMFNT T(1Tdl S CARS 125 208 65 703 604 226 134 476 201 146 319 328 2-axle 2 11 3 2 7 0 2 SO 1 6 4 5 3-axle 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 4-axle 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5-axle+ 10 0 3 0 0 0 0 10 9 5 3 0 TOTALS 137 219 71 705 612 226 136 498 212 157 326 333 • PM Peak Hr Begins at: PEAK VOLUMES = PEAK HR. FACTOR: CONTROL: Slgnallzed NL N7- NR SL 5 / SR tL t l to wt w i vvrc 1600 PM 71 105 37 1361 335 173 187 238 133 1 103 173 164 0.845 0.872 0.816 0.775 APPENDIX C • Puture Growth Increment Calculateon Worksheets n LJ • ~~ EVTM EXISTING EVTM NEW 2000 2007 2030 2030 INTERSECTION LEG ADT ADT ADT ADT' Day Creek Boulevard (NS) /Wilson Avenue (EW) North - 2,300 - 2,500 South - 4,900 2,060 6,500 East - 2,700 2,060 6,000 West - 300 - 300 Etiwanda Avenue-North Leg (NS) /Wilson Avenue (EW) North - 700 2,420 2,600 South - 1,700 1,381 3,200 East - 900 258 3,200 West - 1,300 1,298 4,000 East Avenue (NS) /Wilson Avenue (EW) North - - 2,624 2,000 South - - 2,501 4,000 East - - 1 ,262 3,500 West - - 258 3,200 Wardman Bullock Road (NS) /Wilson Avenue (EW) North - 1,500 1,026 2,300 South 91 9,200 828 7,600 East 91 8,700 1,632 10,100 West - - 1,262 3,500 Cherry Avenue (NS) /Wilson Avenue (EW) North - 14,200 729 15,600 South 2,378 9,500 5,256 11,700 East 1,955 12,700 5,988 15,800 West 1,366 10,600 11,530 18,400 P.djusted for minimum 70% growth over existing ADT volumes. F • ., • DAV CREEK GOULEVARD (NS I\NILSON AVENUE E MORNING PEAK HOUR EVENING PEAK HOUR EXISTING PEAK HOUR TURNIIJG MOVEMENT VOLUMES (AUTOS): EXISTING PEAK HOUR TURNING MOVEMENT VOLUMES (AU TOS): 2007 5 361 96 2007 ~ < 0 B9 v > 10 19 ~ < > v 59 1 . 6 15 > 3 1 > < 2 77 v " v 779 ~ 4 v < > v 66 < 25 394 > 61 21 99 147 EXISTING PEAK HOUR COUNT YEAR (AUTOS): EXISTING PEAK HOUR COUNT YEAR (AUTOS): 2007 462 472 2007 99 v ^96 33 < v IN 1234 < 241 23 < IN = 436 < 74 ' ~ 51 > OUT = 1234 > 172 6 > OUT = v 436 > 758 v 557 480 159 257 EXISTItG PEAK HOUR TURNING MOVEMENT VOLUMES (TRUCKS IN PCE'S): EXISTING PEAK HOUR TURNING MOVEMENT VOLUMES (TRUCKS IN PCE'S): D 34 2 < 0 5 v > 0 o < v > 3 D" D> D D o 2 v v 3 O v v 5 PCE FACTORS BY AXLE: < > PCE FACTORS OY AXLE: < " > 2: 1.5 3: 2.0 4+: 3.0 0 38 5 2: 1.5 3: 2 4+; 3.0 0 O 0 TOTAL EXISTING PEAK HOUR TURNING MOVEMENT VOLUMES (PCES): TOTAL EXISTING PEAK HOUR TURNING MOVEMENT VOLUMES (PCES): 2007 5 395 96 2007 < D 94 v > 10 19 " < v > 62 7 , 6 15> 3 1> < 2 19v " V 182 4 v < > v 71 < 432 > 25 66 21 89 147 EXISTING PEAK PERIDD MODEL YEAR (AUTO); EXISTING PEAK PERIOD MODEL YEAR (AUTO): 2000 ~ 0 0 , 2000 O V 0 O< v IN 0< D D< IN = 0< o 0> OUT= D> D o> OUT= v D> o v 0 0 O 0 EXISTING PEAK PERIOD MODEL YEAR (TRUCKS IN PCE'S): EXISTING PEAK PERIOD MODEL YEAR (TRUCKS IN PCE'S): 2000 0 0 2000 O v 0 0 < v IN = 0 < 0 0 < IN = 0 < 0 0> OUT= 0> 0 D> OUT= ° 0> " 0 v D D o D EXISTING PEAK HOUR MODEL YEAR (PCE'S): EXISTING PEAK HOUR MODEL YEAR (PCE'S): PHF FOR CARS: 0.38 0 D ~ PHF FOR CARS: 0.28 O 0 PHF FOR TRUCKS: 0.337 v PHF FOR TRUCKS: 0.25 v 0< IN = 0< 0 D< IN O< 0 0> OUT= 0> ' 0 0> OUT= v 0> 0 v 0 0 0 0 FUTURE PEAK PERIOD MODEL YEAR (AUTO): ~ _ FUTURE PEAK PERIOD MODEL YEAR (AUTO): 2030 0 0 2030 ~ O v 0 0 c v IN = 60B < 605 0 < IN = 994 < 200 0 > OUT = 608 > 3 0 > DUT = y 994 > " 794 V 605 3 200 79A FUTURE PEAK PERIOD MODEL YEAR (TRUCKS IN PCE'S): FUTURE PEAK PERIOD MODEL YEAR (TRUCKS IN PCE'S): 2020 D o 2020 O 0 v v 0< IN = O< 0 O< IN = O c 0 o> OUT= o> D o> OUT= v D> o v 0 0 0 0 FUTURE PEAK HOUR MODEL YEAR (PCE'S): FUTURE PEAK HOUR Iv10DEl YEAR (PCE'S): PHF FOR CARS: 0.36 0 0 PHF FOR CARS: 0.28 0 0 PHF FOR TRUCKS: 0.333' v PHF FOR TRUCKS: 0.25 v 0 < IN = 231 < ~ 230 D < IN = 276 c 56 0 > OUT = 231 > 1 0 > OUT = v 276 > 222 v 230 1 56 222 RAW GROWTH (PCE'S): 2000 TO ~ 2030 RAW GROWTH (PCE'S): 2000 TO 2030 CONVERSION OF TRUCKS TO: 2025 0 0 CONVERSION OF TRUCKS TO: 2025 O 0 " FACTOR = 1.25 v FACTOR = 1.25 v 56 0 < < 230 0 < D > > 1 0 > V > 222 v 230 1 56 222 ADJUSTED GROWTH (PCE'S): 2000 TO 2030 ADJUSTED GROWTH (PCE'S): 2000 TO 2030 70 MINIMUM GROWTH % 50 50 10 MINIMUM GROWTH % 1 O v " 10 0 < v IN = 290 < 230 0 < IIJ = 290 a 60 10 > OUT = 300 > ~ 20 0 > OUT = v 290 > , 220 v 230 0 60 220 PRORATED GROWTH (PCE'S): 2007 TO 2030 PRORATED GROWTH (PCE'S): 2007 TO 2030 23 YEARS 4D 40 23 YEARS 10 v . t0 D< v < 780 ~ O< 50 10 > > " 2D 0 > v > 170 v 760 0 50 770 NEW PROJECTED VOLUMES (PCE'S): 2030 NEW PROJECTED VOLUMES (PCE'S): 2030 540 550 170 v 170 " 30 < v ~ 430 20 < 130 60 > > 200 ~ 10 > v > " 330 v 780 520 220 430 f•. DAY CREEK BOULEVARD (NS) / WILSOPI AVENUE (EW) FUTURE DIRECTIONAL TURN VOLUMES FROM FUTURE DIRECTIONAL LINK VOLUMES NCHRP 255 ~, YEAR 2030 TRAFFIC CONDITIONS MORNING PEAK HOUR INPUT DATA EVENING PEAK HOUR INPUT DATA TURNING BASE YEAR YEAR 2030 TURNING BASE YEAR YEAR 2030 APPROACH MOVEMENT COUNT APPROACH TOTAL APPROACH MOVEMENT COUNT APPROACH TOTAL NORTH LEFT 25 SOUTH LEG NORTH LEFT 21 SOUTH LEG BOUND THRU 432 IN ... 520 BOUND THRU 89 IN ... 430 RIGHT 66 OUT ... 780 RIGHT 147 OUT ... 220 SOUTH LEFT 98 NORTH LEG SOUTH LEFT 10 NORTH LEG BOUND THRU 395 IN ... 540 BOUND THRU 94 IN ... 110 RIGHT 5 OUT ... 550 RIGHT 0 OUT ... 110 EAST LEFT 19 WEST LEG EAST LEFT 1 WEST LEG BOUND THRU 15 IN ... 60 BOUND THRU 1 IN ... 10 RIGHT 19 OUT ... 30 RIGHT 4 OUT ... 20 WEST LEFT 182 EAST LEG WEST LEFT 71 EAST LEG BOUND THRU 3 IN ... 430 BOUND THRU 2 IN ... 130 RIGHT 62 OUT ... 200 RIGHT 6 OUT ... 33D YEAR 2030 TRAFFIC CONDITIONS MORNING PEAK HOUR RESULTS EVENING PEAK HOUR RESULTS TURNING BASE YEAR YEAR 2030 PEAK -DAILY TURNING BASE YEAR YEAR 2030 PEAK -DAILY APPROACH MOVEMENT COUNT FORECAST RELATIONSHIP APPROACH MOVEMENT COUNT FORECAST RELATIONSHIP NORTH LEFT 25 21 NORTH LEG NORTH LEFT 21 18 NORTH LEG BOUND THRU 432 428 RATIO 43.B% BOUND THRU 89 101 RATIO 8.6% RIGHT 66 73 ADT 2,500 RIGHT 147 313 ADT 2,500 SOUTH LEF'( 98 109 SOUTH LEG SOUTH LEFT 10 15 SOUTH LEG BOUND THRU 395 431 RATIO 2D.0% BOUND THRU 94 94 RATIO 10.0% RIGHT 5 4 ADT 6,500 RIGHT 0 0 ADT 6,500 EAST LEFT 19 20 EAST LEG EAST LEFT 1 1 EAST LEG BOUND THRU 15 18 RATIO 14.7% BOUND THRU 1 2 RATIO 10.7% RIGHT 19 22 ADT 4,300 RIGHT 4 6 ADT 4,300 .WEST LEFT 182 327 WEST LEG WEST LEA 71 119 WEST LEG BOUND THRU 3 4 RATIO 30.1 % BOUND THRU 2 2 RATIO 10.0% RIGHT 62 102 ADT 300 RIGHT 6 8 ADT 3D0 • '. • ETIWANOA AVENUE (NS i WILSON AVENUE E MORNING PEAK HOUR EVENING PEAK HOUR EXISTING PEAK HOUR TURNING 14OVEM ENT VOLUMES (AUTOS): EXISTING PEAK HOUR TURNING MOVEMENT VOLUMES (AU TOS): 2007 41 0 Z3 2007 i6 < 0 v > 2 21 < v > • e 32 11 17> 16 32 > < 31 ' O v " v 0 _ O v < > v 0 < 0 O a 0 0 O 0 EXISTING PEAK HOUR COUNT YEAR (AUTOS): EXISTING PEAK HOUR COUNT YEAR (AUTOS): 2007 64 29 2007 18 v " 43 59 < v IN = 128 < 26 - 47 < IN = 124 < 42 38 > OUT = 128 > 40 64 > OUT = 124 > " 34 v v 0 0 0 0 EXISTING PEAK HOUR TURNING MOVEMENT VOLUMES (TRUCKS IN PCE'S): EXISTING PEAK HOUR TURNING MOVEMENT VOLUMES (TRUCKS IN PCE'S): 5 D 9 0 < 0 v > 0 6 < v > 7 0 0 2 > 5 0 > 0 O v v 0 O v v 0 PCE FACTORS BY AXLE: < > PCE FACTORS BY AXLE: < " > 2: 1.5 ~ 3: 2.0 4+: 3.0 0 0 0 2: 1.5 3: 2 4+: 3.0 0 O 0 TOTAL EXISTING PEAK HOUR TURNING MOVEMENT VOLUMES (PCES) : TOTAL EXISTING PEAK HOUR TURNING MOVEMENT VOLUMES (PCES): 2007 46 0 32 2007 i6 0 2 < V > < v > 27 • 15 32 • 11 19> 24 ~ 32> 31 Ov • v 0 OV < > v 0 < 0 0 > "0 D 0 0 EXISTING PEAK PERIOD MODEL YEAR (AUTO): EXISTING PEAK PERIOD MODEL YEAR (AUTO): zooo o D zooo D v o. 0< v IN 0< 0 D< IN - 0< 0 0> OUT= 0> 0 Oa OUT= v 0> " 0 v o D _ 0 0 EXISTIIJG PEAK PERIOD MODEL YEAR (TRUCKS IN PCE'S): EXISTING PEAK PERIOD MODEL YEAR (TRUCKS IN PCE'S): 2000 0 0 2000 D v 0 0 < v IN = 0 < 0 0 < IN = 0 < D D> OUT= 0> 0 0> OUT= v D> " 0 v 0 o D o EXISTING PEAK HOUR MODEL YEAR (PCE'SI: EXISTING PEAK HOUR MODEL YEAR (PCE'S): PNF FOR CARS: 0,38 0 0 PHF FOR CARS: 0.28 0 0 " PHF FOR TRUCY.S: 0.337 v PHF FOR TRUCKS: 0.25 , v 0 < IN = 0 < 0 - 0 < IN = 0 < 0 0> OUT= 0> 0 0> OUT= v 0> , 0 v 0 0 0 0 FUTURE PEAK PERIOD 14ODEL YEAR (AUTO): FUTURE PEAK PERIOD MODEL YEAR (AUTO): 2030 ~ 740 103 2030 2T9 v "543 250 < v IN = 492 < 30 247 < IN a 940 < 42 27 > OUT= 493 > • 71 te2 > OUT = v 94B > " B4 v 129 07 74 445 FUTURE PEAK PERIOD MODEL YEAR (TRUCKS IN PCE'6): FUTURE PEAK PERIOD MODEL YEAR (TRUCKS IN PCE'^u): 2020 0 0 2020 0 v 0 D < v IN = 0 < 0 0 < IN - 0 < 0 D> OUT= ~ 0> D Oa OUT= v 0> 0 v a D D o FUTURE PEAK HOUR MODEL YEAR (PCE'SJ: FUTURE PEAK HOUR MODEL VEAR (PCE'SJ: PHF FOR CARS: 0.38 132 39 PHF FOR CARS: 0.28 78 152 PHF FOR TRUCKS: 0.333 v PHF FOR TRUCKS: 0.25 v 95 < IN - 187 < 11 69 < IN - 2B5 < 12 . 10 > OUT = 187 > 4 51 a OUT = v 265 > 2S v 49 ~33 21 725 RAW GROWTH (PCE'GJ: 2000 TO 2030 RAW GROWTH (PCE'S): 2000 TO 2030 CONVERSION OF TRUCKS TO: 2025 132 39 CONVERSION OF TRUCKS TO: 2025 78 152 " FACTOR= t.25 v FACTOR= 1.25 v 12 95< 10 > > 17 4 69< 51 > v > 24 v 49 33 ~ 21 125 ADJUSTED GROWTH (PCE'S): 2000 TO 2030 ADJUSTED GROWTH (PCE'S): 2000 TO 2030 10 td INIMUM GROWTH % 130 40 70 MINIMUM GROWTH % 80 v "150 100 < v IN = 180 < 10 70 < IN = 260 < 10 10 > OUT = 200 > • 10 50 > OUT = v •260 > 20 v 50 30 20 120 PRORATED GROWTH (PCE'S); 2007 TO 2030 PRORATED GROWTH (PCE'S): 2007 TO 2030 23 YEARS 100 30 23 YEARS 60 v •120 80 < v 10 50 < < t0 10>, > iD 4D> v > 20 v 40 20 20 90 NEW PROJECTED VOLUMES (PCE'S): 2030 NEW PROJECTED VOLUMES (PCE'S): 2030 100 70 60 v 160 • 150 < v 50 100 < 50 ' 60 > > 60 100 > V > • 50 v 40 20 20 9D • ETIWANDA AVENUE (NS) /WILSON AVENUE (EW) FUTURE DIRECTIONAL TURN VOLUMES FROM FUTURE DIRECTIONAL LINK VOLUMES NCHRP 255 • YEAR 2030 TRAFFIC CONDITIONS MORNING PEAK HOUR INPUT DATA EVENING PEAK HOUR INPUT DATA TURNING BASE YEAR YEAR 2030 TURNING BASE YEAR YEAR 2030 APPROACH MOVEMENT COUNT APPROACH TOTAL APPROACH MOVEMENT COUNT APPROACH TOTAL NORTH LEFT 43 SOUTH LEG NORTH LEFT 21 SOUTH LEG BOUND THRU 40 IN ... 20 BOUND THRU 68 IN ... 90 RIGHT 17 OUT ... 40 RIGHT 11 OUT ... 20 SOUTH LEFT 21 NORTH LEG SOUTH LEFT 26 NORTH LEG BOUND THRU 28 IN ... 180 BOUND THRU 21 IN ... 80 RIGHT 52 OUT ... 70 RIGHT 53 OUT ... 160 EAST LEFT 30 WEST LEG EAST LEFT 57 WEST LEG BOUND THRU 52 IN ... 60 BOUND THRU 36 IN ... 110 RIGHT 17 OUT .:. 150 RIGHT 7 OUT ... 100 WEST LEFT 10 EAST LEG WEST LEFT 5 EAST LEG BOUND THRU 73 IN ... 50 BOUND THRU 53 IN ... 50 RIGHT 17 OUT ... 60 RIGHT 42 OUT ... 50 YEAR 2030 TRAFFIC CONDITIONS MORNING PEAK HOUR RESULTS EVENING PEAK HOUR RESULTS TURNING BASE YEAR YEAR 2030 PEAK -DAILY TURNING BASE YEAR YEAR 2030 PEAK -DAILY APPROACH MOVEMENT COUNT FORECAST RELATIONSHIP APPROACH MOVEMENT COUNT FORECAST RELATIONSHIP NORTH LEFT 43 5 NORTH LEG NORTH LEFT 21 21 NORTH LEG BOUND THRU 40 13 RATIO 9.8% BOUND THRU 66 63 RATIO 9.2% RIGHT 17 2 ADT 2,600 RIGHT 11 6 ADT 2,600 SOUTH LEFT 21 38 SOUTH LEG SOUTH LEFT 26 15 SOUTH LEG BOUND THRU 28 33 RATIO 2.2% BOUND THRU 21 13 RATIO 3.9% RIGHT 52 114 ADT 2,800 RIGHT 53 52 ADT 2,600 EAST LEFT 30 38 EAST LEG EAST LEFT 57 75 EAST LEG BOUND THRU 52 20 RATIO 10.1 % BOUND THRU 36 29 RATIO 9.1 RIGHT 17 4 ADT 1,100 RIGHT 7 6 ADT 1,100 WEST LEFT 10 2 WEST LEG WEST LEFT 5 2 WEST LEG BOUND THRU 73 30 RATIO 9.2% BOUND THRU 53 27 RATIO 9.1 RIGHT 17 19 ADT 2,300 RIGHT 42 21 ADT 2,300 • f• • EABT AVENUE NB 1 W ILSON AVENUE (E MORNING PEAK HOUR EVENING PEAK HOUR EXISTING PEAK HOUR TURNING MOVEMENT VOLUMES (AUTOS): EXISTING PEAK HOUR TURNING MOVEMENT VOLUMES (AU TOS): ' 2007 0 0 0 2007 < 0 O v > 0 0 < v > 0 0 0 0 > < 0 0 > < 0 O v v 0 O v < > v 0 ' ~ o D> o o o o EXISTING PEAK HOUR COUNT YEAR (AUTOS): EXISTING PEAK HOUR COUNT YEAR (AUTOS): zoo? 0 o zoo? 0 v 0 ' 0 < IN v= 0 < 0 0 < IN = 0 < 0 0> OUT= 0> 0 0> OUT= v D> 0 " v o o D o EXISTING PEAK HOUR TURNING MOVEMENT VOLUMES (TRUCKS IN PCE'S): EXISTING PEAK HOUR TURNING MOVEMENT VOLUMES (TRUCKS IN PCE'S): 0 0 0 < 0 O v > 0 0 < v > 0 0 ~ ~ 0 0 > 0 0 > < 0 O y y 0 O v v 0 PCE FACTORS BY AXLE: < > PCE FACTORS BV AXLE: < ' > 2: 1.5 3: 2.0 4i: 3.0 D 0 0 2: 1.5 3: 2 4~: 3.0 0 D 0 TOTAL EXISTING PEAK HOUR TURNING MOVEMENT VOLU MES (PCES) : TOTAL EXISTING PEAK HOUR TURNING MOVEMENT VOLUMES (PCES~: zoo? 0 0 0 2007 < 0 0 v 0 o' < y o o o o> < o o> o oy . y o ov > y a < 0 o, o o o o EXISTING PEAK PERIOD MODEL YEAR (AUTO): EXISTING PEAK PERIOD MODEL YEAR (AUTO): zooo o D zooo a v o 0 < IN v= 0 < 0 0 < IN = 0 < 0 0> OUT= 0> 0 0>. OUT= y 0> o v 0 o a o EXISTING PEAK PERIOD MODEL YEAR (TRUCKS IN PCE'S) : EXISTING PEAK PERI00 MODEL YEAR (TRUCKS IN PCE'S): 2D00 0 0 2000 0 V - 0 0 < y IN - 0 < D 0 < IN - 0 < D 0> OUT= 0> 0 0> OUT= v 0> 0 V 0 0 0 0 EXISTING PEAK HOUR MODEL YEAR (PGE'S): EXISTING PEAK HOUR MODEL YEAR (PCE'S): PHF FOR CARS: 0.30 0 0 PHF FOR GARB: 0.28 0 0 PHF FOR TRUCKS: 0.333 v PHF FOR TRUCKS: 0.25 v 0 < IN - 0 < 0 0 < IN = 0 < D 0> OUT= 0> 0 0> OUT= v 0> 0 v 0 0 0 0 FUTURE PEAK PERIOD MODEL YEAR (AUTO): FUTURc' PEAK PERIOD MODEL YEAR (AUTO): 2070 201 100 • 2030 359 v 4B7 30 < IN v= <67 < 90 42 < IIJ = " 1137 < 174 11 > OUT = 467 > Bo 84 > OUT = y 1137 > ' 309 y26B OS 299 520 F.UT URE PEAK PERIOD MODEL YEAR (TRUCKS IN PCE'S): FUTURE PEAK PERIOD MODEL YEAR (TRUCKS IN PCE'S): 2DZD 0 o zazo o v o 0< IN v= D< 0 O c IN = 0< 0 0> OUT= 0> " D 0> OUT= V 0> ^ 0 y 0 0 0 0 FUTURE PEAK HOUR MODEL YEAR (PCE'S): FUTURE PEAK HOUR MODEL YEAR (PCE'S): PHF FOR CARS: 0.38 107 39 PHF FOR CARS: 0.28 10t 136 PHF FOR TRUCKS: 0.333 v PHF FOR TRUCKS: 0.25 v 11 < = IN 177 < 34 12 < IN = 316 < 49 4> OUT= 177> 26 24> OUi= v 31Ba 87 v 102 32 B4 146 RAW GROWTH (PCE'SJ: 20D0 TO 2030 RAW GROWTH (PCE'S): 2000 TO 2030 ' CONVERSION OF TRUCKB TO: 2025 107 36 CONVERSION OF TRUCKS TO: 2025 101 t36 FACTOR= 1.25 v FACTOR= 1.26 v 49 11 < 4 > < > 34 26 12 < 2a > v > 87 v102 ~ 32 84 146 ADJUSTED GROWTH (PCE'S): 2000 TO 2030 ADJUSTED GROWTH (PCES): 2D00 TO 2030 10 MINIMUM GROWTH % 110 40 10 MINIMUM GROWTH % 100 v ^140 ' 10 < IN v- 170 < 30 10 c IN = 320 < 50 0 > OUT = 1 BO > 30 20 > OUT = y 320 > 90 v 100 30 80 160 PRORATED GROWTH (PCE'S): 2007 TO 2030 PRORATED GROWTH (PCE'S): 2007 TO 2030 23 YEARS BO 30 23 YEARS 80 v -110 10< y 20 iD< c 40 0 > > 20 20 > v > 70 v BO 20 60 120 NEW PROJECTED VOLUMES (PCE'S): 2030 NEW PROJECTED VOLUMES (PCE'S): 2030 BO 30 " BO V 110 ^ 10 < y < 20 10 < 40 0 > > 20 20 > v > 70 v BO 2D 60 120 I• EAST AVENUE (NS) /WILSON AVENUE (EW) FUTURE DIRECTIONAL TURN VOLUMES FROM FUTURE DIRECTIONAL LINK VOLUMES NCHRP 255 • YEAR 2030 TRAFFIC CONDITIONS MORNING PEAK HOUR INPUT DATA EVENING PEAK HOUR INPUT DATA TURNING BASE YEAR YEAR 2030 TURNING BASE YEAR YEAR 2030 APPROACH MOVEMENT COUNT APPROACH TOTAL APPROACH MOVEMENT COUNT APPROACH TOTAL NORTH LEFT 11 SOUTH LEG NORTH LEFT 3 SOUTH LEG BOUND THRU 67 IN ... 20 BOUND THRU 73 IN ... 120 RIGHT 22 OUT ... 80 RIGHT 23 OUT ... 60 SOUTH LEFT 11 NORTH LEG SOUTH LEFT 35 NORTH LEG BOUND THRU 84 IN ... 80 BOUND THRU 60 IN ... 80 RIGHT 5 OUT ... 30 RIGHT 5 OUT ... 110 EAST LEFT 20 WEST LEG EAST LEFT 35 WEST LEG BOUND THRU 27 IN .., 0 BOUND THRU 45 IN ... 20 RIGHT 53 OUT ... 10 RIGHT 19 OUT ... 10 WEST LEFT 62 EAST LEG WEST LEFT 32 EAST LEG BOUND THRU 15 IN ... 20 BOUND THRU 11 IN ... 40 RIGHT 23 OUT ... 20 RIGHT 58 OUT ... 70 YEAR 2030 TRAFFIC CONDITIONS MORNING PEAK HOUR RESULTS EVENING PEAK HOUR RESULTS TURNING BASE YEAR YEAR 2030 PEAK -DAILY TURNING BASE YEAR YEAR 2030 PEAK -DAILY APPROACH MOVEMENT COUNT FORECAST RELATIONSHIP APPROACH MOVEMENT COUNT FORECAST RELATIONSHIP NORTH LEFT 11 1 NORTH LEG NORTH LEFT 3 3 NORTH LEG BOUND THRU 67 19 RATIO 6.1 % BOUND THRU 73 81 RATIO 9.3% RIGHT 22 4 ADT 2,000 RIGHT 23 31 ADT 2,000 SOUTH LEFT 11 16 SOUTH LEG SOUTH LEFT 35 30 SOUTH LEG BOUND THRU 84 71 RATIO 5.5% BOUND THRU 60 4-4 RATIO 9.2% RIGHT 5 6 ADT 1,900 RIGHT 5 3 ADT 1,900 EAST LEFT 20 0 EAST LEG EAST LEFT 35 6 EAST LEG BOUND THRU 27 0 RATIO 4.3%, BOUND THRU 45 9 RATIO 10.8% RIGHT 53 0 ADT 1,000 RIGHT 19 3 ADT 1,000 WEST LEFT 62 9 WEST LEG WEST LEFT 32 12 WEST LEG BOUND THRU 15 3 RATIO 5.0% BOUND THRU 11 4 RATIO 14.6% RIGHT 23 i1 ADT 200 RIGHT 56 22 ADT 200 • i • • WAR DM AN BULLOCK ROAD (NS i WILSON AV EIJUE (E1 MORNING PEAK HOUR EVENING PEAK HOUR EXISTING PEAK HOUR TU RNIND MOVEMENT VOLUMES (AUTOS): E XISTING PEAK HOUR TURNING MOVEMENT VOLUMES (AU TOS): 1 18 13 2007 59 0 14 2007 < > V 0 < v > 16 D 30 0 0 > O v v 0 121 0 > O v < > < V 407 ~ 0 58 > 217 0 25 212 EXISTING PEAK HOUR COUNT YEAR (AUTOS): EXISTING PEAK HOUR COUNT YEAR (AUTOS): 73 55~ 2007 32 74 2007 v 1 < v IN 444 < 137 0 < IN = 747 < 437 0 > OU7 = 444 > ^ 230 ~ 0 > OUT = v 747 > 226 v139 275 466 237 EXISTING PEAK HOUR TURNING MOVEMENT VOLUMES (TRUCKS IN PCE'S): EXISTING PEAK HOUR TURNING MOVEMENT VOLUMES (TRUCKS IN PCE'S): 0 5 2 < 0 2 v > 0 0 < v > 8 0 0 0 D > O v v 53 D 0 > O v v 3fi PCE FACTORS BY A%LE: < > PCE FACTORS 8Y AXLE: 3 0 4 < ^ 0 2 57 2: 1.5 3: 2.0 9~: 3.0 TOTAL EXISTING PEAK HOUR TURNING MOVEMENT VOLUMES (PCES) 0 2 : 26 . t: 2: 1.5 3: 2 TOTAL EXISTING PEAK HOUR TURNIND MOVEMENT VOLUMES (PCES) : 2007 1 23 15 2007 < 0 V 61 > l4 0 < v > 24 0 ^ 30 D > 53 0 > 0 y v 0 443 0 v v 121 < > < ^ D 60 > 243 0 27 269 EXISTING PEAK PERIOD MODEL YEAR (AUTO): EXISTING PEAK PERIOD MODEL YEAR (AUTO): 0 D 2000 0 D 2000 V ' 0 < Y IN = 2B < 16 0 c IN 63 < 20 0> OUT= 28> 10 ~ 0> OUT= v 63> 43 v 18 10 20 43 EXISTING PEAK PERIOD MODEL YEAR (TRUCKS IN PCE'S): EXISTING PEAK PERIOD MODEL VEAR (TRUCKS IN PCE'S): 0 0 2000 0 0 2000 V 0 < V IN = 0 < 0 0 < IN = D < 0 0> OUT= 0> 0 0> OUT= v 0> 0 v 0 0 0 0 EXISTING PEAK HOUR MODEL YEAR (PCE'S): EXISTING PEAK HOUR MODEL YEAR (PCE'S): O 0 PHF FOR CARS'. O.3B o 0 PHF FOR CARS: 0.28 PHF FOR TRUCKS: 0.333 v PHF FOR TRUCKS: 0.25 0 < IN V= 18 < 6 o <. IN = 17 < 7 0> OU = 16> 12 0> OUT= 11> 4 T 7 4 6 12 FUTURE PEAK PERIOD MODEL VEAR (AUTO): FUTURE PEAK PERIOD MODEL VEAR (AUTO): 731 213 2030 127 40 2030 V 90 < IN V= - 357 < 74 174 < IN = 046 < 203 89 > OUT = 357 > 194 709 > OUT = V B45 > 270 v 33 87 180 113 FUTURE PEAK PERIOD MODEL VEAR (THUCKS IN PCE'S): FUTURE PEAK PERIOD MODEL YEAR (TRUCKS IN PCE'S): 0 0 2020 0 0 2020 v o < IN v= 46 < 41 0 < IN = 85 < 8 0> OUT= 46> ^ 5 0> OUT= v BS> 77 V 41 5 8 77 FUTURE PEAK HOUR MODEL YEAR (PCE'S): FUTURE PEAK HOUR MODEL YEAR (PCE'S): 37 60 PHF FOR CARS; 0.38 4B 15 PHF FOR CARS: 0.26 PHF FOR TRUCKS: 0.333 v " PHF FOR TRUCKS: 0.25 48 < v IN = 25B < 04 34 < IN = 151 < 42 75 87 > OUT = 258 > 95 26 > OUT = 1 St a v v 26 35 55 51 RAW GROWTH (PCE'S): 2000 TO 2030 RAVJ GROWTH (PCE'S): 2000 TO 2030 37 60 CONVERSION OF TRUCKS TO: 2025 4B 15 CONVERSION OF TRUCKS TO: 2025 . FACTOR = 1 ~5 v FACTOR = 1.25 49 < v 78 34 < ` 38 72 67 > > BB 26 > > " V v 23 31 50 44 ADJUSTED GROWTH (PCE'S): 2000 TO 2030 ADJUSTED GROWTH (PCE'S): 2000 TO 2030 40 60 10 MINIMUM GROWTH % 50 20 ^ 1D MINIMUM GROWTH % Y 30 < ~ IN = 150 < 40 50 < 9D > IN = OUT = 250 < 250 > BO 90 • 30 > OUT = 140 > 70 v v 20 30 50 40 PRORATED GROWTH (PCE'S): 2007 TO 2030 PRORATED GROWTH (PCE'S): 2007 TO 2030 30 50 23 YEARS 40 20 23 VEARS v 20 < v < 30 40 < < > 60 70 20 > > 50 70 > v v 20 20 40 30 NEW PROJECTED VOLUMES (PCE'SJ: 2030 NEW PROJECTED VOLUMES (PCESJ: 2030 170 f10 80 100 v 70 < v 230 40 < 70 > > 530 350 20 > > 310 v. 160 320 540 330 t• WARDMAN BULLOCK ROAD (NS) /WILSON AVENUE (EW) FUTURE DIRECTIONAL TURN VOLUMES FROM FUTURE DIRECTIONAL LINK VOLUMES NCHRP 255 YEAR 2030 TRAFFIC CONDITIONS MORNING PEAK HOUR INPUT DATA EVENING PEAK HOUR INPUT DATA TURNING BASE YEAR YEAR 2030 TURNING BASE YEAR YEAR 2030 APPROACH MOVEMENT COUNT APPROACH TOTAL APPROACH MOVEMENT COUNT APPROACH TOTAL NORTH LEFT 12 SOUTH LEG NORTH LEFT 7 SOUTH LEG BOUND THRU 34 IN ... 320 BOUND THRU 36 IN ... 330 RIGHT 53 OUT ... 160 RIGHT 57 OUT ... 540 SOUTH LEFT 44 NORTH LEG SOUTH LEFT 24 NORTH LEG BOUND THRU 46 IN ... BO BOUND THRU 73 IN ... 110 RIGHT 10 OUT ... 100 RIGHT 3 OUT ... 110 EAST LEFT 11 WEST LEG EAST LEFT 8 WEST LEG BOUND THRU 70 IN ... 20 BOUND THRU 52 IN ... 70 RIGHT 18 OUT ... 70 RIGHT 40 OUT ... 40 WEST LEFT 40 EAST LEG WEST LEFT 74 EAST LEG BOUND THRU 35 IN ... 23o BOUND THRU 11 IN ... 530 RIGHT 25 OUT ... 310 RIGHT 15 OUT ... 350 YEAR 2030 TRAFFIC CONDITIONS __ MORNING PEAK HOUR RESULTS EVENING PEAK HOUR RESULTS TURNING BASE YEAR YEAR 2030 PEAK -DAILY TURNING BASE YEAR YEAR 2030 PEAK -DAILY APPROACH MOVEMENT COUNT FORECAST RELATIONSHIP APPROACH MOVEMENT COUNT FORECAST RELATIONSHIP NORTH LEFT ~12 15 NORTH LEG NORTH LEFT 7 9 NORTH LEG BOUND THRU 34 54 RATIO 7.8% BOUND THRU 36 57 RATIO 9.^0% RIGHT 53 247 ADT 2,300 RIGHT 57 266 ADT 2,300 SOUTH LEFT 44 47 SOUTH LEG SOUTH LEFT 24 38 SOUTH LEG BOUND THRU 46 29 RATIO 4.7% BOUND THRU 73 7l RATIO 6.6% RIGHT 10 3 ADT 10,100 RIGHT 3 1 ADT 10,100 EAST LEFT 11 1 EAST LEG EAST LEFT 8 2 EAST LEG BOUND THRU 70 16 RATIO 5.4% BOUND THRU 52 46 RATIO 8.9% RIGHT 18 3 ADT 9,900 RIGHT 40 22 ADT 9,900 WEST LEFT 40 128 WEST LEG WEST LEFT 74 447 WEST LEG BOUND THRU 35 52 RATIO 9.0% BOUND THRU 11 30 RATIO 11.0% RIGHT 25 45 ADT 1,000 RIGHT 15 50 ADT 1,000 • • • • CHERRY AVENUE NS /WILSON AVENUE E15 MORNING PEAK HOUR EVENING PEAK HOUR EXISTING PEAK HOUR TURNING MOVEMENT VOLUMES (AUTOS): EXISTING PEAK HOUR TURNING MOVEMENT VOLUMES (A UTOS): 2p07 31 181 280 2007 < 173 330 v > 359 93 < V > 470 - 86 162 1B7 > 217 227 > 170 56 v " V 53 125 V V 100 < 377 91 > 109 < 62 97 > 34 EXISTING PEAK HOUR COUNT YEAR (AUTOS): EXISTING PEAK HOUR COUNT YEAR (AUTOSI: 2007 492 940 2007 862 v 345 ' 339 < v IN = 2145 < 740 405 < IN = 1925 < 432 336 > OUT = 2145 > 576 43B > OUT = 1925 > 620 v - v ' 290 577 555 193 EXISTING PEAK HOUR TURNING MOVEMENT VOLUMES (TRUCKS IN PCE'S): EXISTING PEAK HOUR TURNING MOVEMENT VOLUMES (T RUCKS IN PCE'S): 9 11 11 0 8 3 < v > < v > 3 _ " 27 2 3 t0 > < 40 26 > B 3 v v 12 23 v v 5 PCE FACTORS BY AXLE: < " > PCE FACTORS BY AXLE: < " > 2: 1.5 3: 2.0 4+: 3.0 8 10 12 2: 1.5 3: 2 4+: 3.0 24 12 6 TOTAL EXISTING PEAK HOUR TURNING MOVEMENT VOLUMES (PCES): TOTAL EXISTING PEAK HOUR TURNING MOVEMENT VOLU MES (PCES): 2007 40 192 291 2007 173 330 362 < v > < v > 96 " 497 BB " 165 197 > 257 253 > 170 59 V , V fi5 14B V < > V 105 < 99 387 > 121 86 109 40 EXISTING PEAK PERIOD MODEL YEAR (AUTO): EXISTING PEAK PERIOD MODEL YEAR (AUTO): 2000 0 0 2000 O 0 v V 124 < IN 402 < 115 368 < IN 1106 < 173 180 > OUT = 402 > 55 304 > OUT = 1107 > 445 V V " 223 99 294 629 EXISTING PEAK PERIOD MODEL YEAR (TRUCKS IN PCE'S): EXISTING PEAK PERIOD MODEL YEAR (f RUCKS IN PCE'S) : 2000 0 0 2000 O 0 v V O< IN = 0< 0 0< IN = O< 0 0> OUT= 0> o ~ 0> OUT= 0> 0 v v D o 0 0 EXISTING PEAK HOUR MODEL YEAR (PCE'S): EXISTING PEAK HOUR MODEL YEAR (PCE'S): PHF FOR CARS: 0.38 D D PHF FOR CARS: 0.28 O 0 " PHF FOR TRUCKS: O.3a3 v PHF FOR TRUCKS: 0.25 v 47 < IN 153 < 44 103 c IN = 310 < 4B 71 > OUT = 153 > 21 ~ 65 > OUT = 310 > 125 v v " 85 38 82 176 FUTURE PEAK PERIOD IJ~ODEL YEAR (AUTO): FUTURE PEAK PERIOD MODEL YEAR (AUTO): 2030 72 40 2030 107 178 V " V 444 < IN 2173 < 177 2495 < IN = 3956 < 1218 1688 > OUT = 2173 > 883 1352 > OUT = V 3957 > " 697 v 806 23fi 587 1285 FUTURE PEAK PERIOD MODEL YEAR (TRUCKS IN PCE'S) : FUTURE PEAK PERIOD MODEL YEAR (TRUCKS IN PCE'S): zozo 0 o zozo 0 0 V V 51 < IN = 170 < 139 ~ 23 < IN = 231 < 45 20 > OUT = 171 > 7 ~ 98 > OUT . V 240 > 156 v 113 11 61 BB FUTURE PEAK HOUR MODEL YEAR (PCE'S): FUTURE PEAK HOUR MODEL YEAR (PCE'S): PHF FOR CARS: 0.38 27 15 PHF FOR GARS: 028 28 50 " PHF FOR TRUCKS: 0.333 v PHF FOR TRUCKS: 0.25 v 186 < IN = 882 < 114 704 < IN = 1165 < 352 648 > OUT = 883 > 338 403 > OUT = V 1168 > ^ 234 344 93 180 382 RAW GROWTH (PCE'SJ: 2000 TO 2030 RAW GROWTH (PCE'S): 2000 TO 2030 CONVERSION OF TRUCKS TO: 2025 27 t5 CONVERSION OF TRUCKS TO: 2025 28 50 FACTOR = 125 v FACTOR = 1.25 V " 143 < 81 603 < < 307 57B > > 31 B 324 > v > " 119 v ' 269 57 101 211 ADJUSTED GROWTH (PCE'S): 2000 TO 2030 ADJUSTED GROWTH (PCE'S): 2000 TO 2030 10 MINIMUM GROWTH °e 50 100 10 MINItAUM GROWTH % 90 • 50 V v 140 < IN = 770 < 80 600 < IN = 930 < 310 580 > OUT = 630 > 320 320 > OUT = 870 > 120 V y 270 so 100 z1o PRORATED GROWTH (PCE'S): 2007 TO 2030 PRORATED GROWTH (PCE'S): 2007 TO 2030 23 YEARS 40 80 23 YEARS 70 -40 V • v 110 < < 60 460 < 240 440 > > 250 250 > v > 90 v 210 50 BO 160 NEW PROJECTED VOLUMES (PCE'S): 2030 NEW PROJECTED VOLUMES (PCE'S): 2030 560 1060 940 400 • v v 510 < < BBO 9oD c 690 790 > > ~ 860 740 > v > • 750 V 530 660 670 400 CHERRY AVENUE (NS) /WILSON AVENUE (EW) r FUTURE DIRECTIONAL TURN VOLUMES FROM FUTURE DIRECTIONAL LINK VOLUMES NCHRP 255 YEAR 2030 TRAFFIC CONDITIONS MORNING PEAK HOUR INPUT DATA EVENING PEAK HOUR INPUT DATA TURNING BASE YEAR YEAR 2030 TURNING BASE YEAR YEAR 2030 APPROACH MOVEMENT COUNT APPROACH TOTAL APPROACH MOVEMENT COUNT APPROACH TOTAL NORTH LEFT 99 SOUTH LEG NORTH LEFT 86 SOUTH LEG BOUND THRU 387 IN ... 660 BOUND THRU 109 IN ... 400 RIGHT 121 OUT ... 530 RIGHT 40 OUT ... 670 SOUTH LEFT 291 NORTH LEG SOUTH LEFT 362 NORTH LEG BOUND THRU 192 IN ... 560 BOUND THRU 338 IN ... 940 RIGHT 40 OUT ... 1,060 RIGHT 173 OUT ... 400 EAST LEFT 96 WEST LEG EAST LEFT 88 WEST LEG BOUND THRU 197 IN ... 790 BOUND THRU 253 IN ... 740 RIGHT 59 OUT ... 510 RIGHT 148 OUT ... 900 WEST LEFT 65 EAST LEG WEST LEFT 105 EAST LEG BOUND THRU 257 IN ... 880 BOUND THRU 178 IN ... 690 RIGHT 497 OUT ... 860 RIGHT 165 OUT ... 750 YEAR 2030 TRAFFIC CONDITIONS MORNING PEAK HOUR RESULTS EVENING PEAK HOUR RESULTS TURNING BASE YEAR YEAR 2030 PEAK -DAILY TURNING BASE YEAR YEAR 2030 PEAK -DAILY APPROACH MOVEMENT COUNT FORECAST RELATIONSHIP APPROACH MOVEMENT COUNT FORECAST RELATIONSHIP NORTH LEFT 99 136 NORTH LEG NORTH LEFT 86 217 NORTH LEG BOUND THRU 387 398 RATIO 10.5% BOUND THRU 109 123 RATIO 8.5% RIGHT 121 142 ADT 15,600 RIGHT 40 52 ADT 15,600 SOUTH LEFT 291 278 SOUTH LEG SOUTH LEFT 362 318 SOUTH LEG BOUND THRU 192 251 RATIO 10.3% BOUND THRU 338 312 RATIO 9.1 RIGHT 40 45 ADT 11,700 RIGHT 173 293 ADT 11,700 EAST LEFT 96 188 EAST LEG EAST LEFT 88 114 EAST LEG BOUND THRU 197 440 RATIO 11.1°6 BOUIJD THRU 253 379 RATIO 9.0% RIGHT 59 181 ADT 15,800 RIGHT 146 233 ADT 15,800 WEST LEFT 65 97 WEST LEG WEST LEFT 105 125 WEST LEG BOUND THRU 257 329 RATIO 7.2% BOUND THRU 178 390 RATIO 8.8% RIGHT 497 475 ADT 1,8,400 RIGHT 165 162 ADT 18,400 • (• APPENDIX D Explanation anti Calculation of Intersection Delay • EXPLANATION AND CALCULATION OF INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE USING DELAY METHODOLOGY The levels of service at the unsignalized and signalized intersections are calculated using the delay methodology in the 2000 Highway Capacity Mahual. This methodology views an intersection as consisting of several lane groups. A lane group is a set of lanes serving a movement. If there are two northbound left turn lanes, then the lane group serving the northbound left turn movement has two lanes. Similarly, there may be three lanes in the lane group serving the northbound through movement, one lane in the lane group serving the northbound right turn movement, and so forth. It is also possible for one lane to serve two lane groups. A shared lane might result in there being 1.5 lanes in the northbound left turn lane group and 2.5 lanes in the northbound through lane group. For each lane group, there is a capacity. That capacity is calculated by multiplying the number of lanes in the lane group times a theoretical maximum lane capacity per lane time's 12 adjustment factors. • Each of the '12 adjustment factors has a value of approximately 1.00. A value less than 1.00 is generally assigned when a less than desirable condition occurs. The 1.2 adjustment factors are as follows: 1. Peak hour factor (to account for peaking within the peak hour) 2. Lane utilization factor (to account for not all lanes loading equally) 3. Lane width 4. Percent of heavy trucks 5. Approach grade 6. Parking 7. Bus stops at intersections LJ ,~ 8. Area type (CBD or other) 9. Right turns 10. Left turns 11. Pedestrian activity 12. Signal progression The maximum theoretical lane capacity and the 12 adjustment factors for it are all unknowns for which approximate estimates have been recommended in the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual. For the most part, the recommended values-are not based on statistical analysis but rather on educated estimates. However, it is possible to use the delay method and get reasonable results as will be discussed below. Once the lane group volume is known and the lane group capacity is known, a volume to capacity ratio can be calculated for the lane group. • With a volume to capacity ratio calculated, average delay per vehicle in a lane group can be estimated. The average delay per vehicle in a lane group is calculated using a complex formula provided by the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual, which can be simplified and described as follows: Delay per vehicle in a lane group is a function of the following: 1. Cycle length 2. Amount of red time faced by a lane group 3. Amount of yellow dime for that lane group 4. The volume to capacity ratio of the lane group The average delay per vehicle for each lane group is calculated, and eventually an overall average delay for all vehicles entering the intersection is calculated. This average delay per vehicle is then used to judge Level of Service. The Level of Services are defined in the table that follows this discussion. Experience has shown that when a maximum lane capacity of 1,900 vehicles per hour is used (as recommended in the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual, little or no yellow time penalty is used, and none of the 12 penalty factors are applied, calculated delay is realistic. The delay calculation for instance assumes that yellow time is totally unused. Yet experience shows that most of the yellow time is used. An idiosyncrasy of the delay methodology is that it is possible to add traffic to an intersection and reduce the average total delay per vehicle. If the average total delay is 30 seconds per vehicle for all vehicles traveling through an intersection, and traffic is added to a movement that has an average total delay of 15 seconds per vehicle, then the overall average total delay is reduced. • The delay calculation for a lane group is based on a concept that the delay is a function of the amount of unused capacity available. As the volume approaches capacity and there is no more unused capacity available, then the delay rapidly increases. Delay is not proportional to volume, but rather increases rapidly as the unused capacity approaches zero. Because delay is not linearly related to volumes, the delay does not reflect how close an intersection is to overloading. If an intersection is operating at Level of Service C and has an average total delay of 18 seconds per vehicle, you know very little as to what percent the traffic can increase before E is reached. n LJ I• • LEVEL OF SERVICE DESCRIPTIONI Average Total Delay Per Vehicle Seconds level of Service Description Signalized Unsignalized A Level of Service A occurs when progression is extremely favorable 0 to 10.00 0 to 10.00 and most vehicles arrive during the green phase. Most vehicles do not stop at all. Short cycle lengths may also contribute to low delay. B Level of Service B generally occurs with good progression and/or 70.01 to 20.00 70.01 to 15.00 short cycle lengths. More vehicles stop than far Level of Service A, causing higher levels of average total delay. C Level of Service C generally results when there is fair progression 20.01 to 35.00 75.07 to 25.00 and/or longer cycle lengths. Individual cycle failures may begin to appear in this level. The number of vehicles stopping is significant at this level, although many still pass through the intersection without stopping. D Level of Service D generally results in noticeable congestion. 35.01 to 55.00 25.01 to 35.00 Longer delays may result from some combination of unfavorable progression, long cycle lengths, or high volume to capacity ratios. Many vehicles stop, and the proportion of vehicles not stopping declines. Individual cycle failures are noticeable. E Level of Service E is considered to be the limit of acceptable delay. 55.01 to 80.00 35.07 l0 50.00 These high delay values generally indicate poor progression, long - cycle lengths, and high volume to capacity ratios. Individual cycle failures are frequent occurrences. F Level of Service F is considered to be unacceptable tq most drivers. 80.01 and up 50.01 and up This condition often occurs with oversaturation, i.e., when arrival flow rates exceed the capacity of the intersection. It may also occur at high volume to capacity ratios below 1.00 with many individual cycle failures. Poor progression and long cycle lengths may also be major contributing causes to such delay levels. ' Source: Highwav Caoacity Manual Special Report 209, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2000. • ~xistinq • • Existing AM ___________ Thu Mar ______________________ 1, 2007 09:19:13 __________________ ___________ ______ Page . _____ 3-1 ______ _ Wilson Avenue Extension Existing -------------- Mor ning Peak Hour --------- --- - --------- - --- Level Of Ser P vice Com utation R p e ort 2000 HCM Operat ions M ethod (Base Volume Alternativ e) **#++#+***** *k***#*#+###*k*k *#*#** ****k*****#*t****# *********#* **+*tk #**** ****** Intersection #1 Day Creek Bo ulevar d (NS)/Wilson Aven ue (EW) *#********** **************** ***k#* *******#********** ******#**** ****** ***** ****** Cycle (sec): 80 Critical Vol ./Cap.(X): 0.4 00 Loss Time (s ec): 6 (Y+ R=9.0 sec) Average Dela y (sec/veh) : .22 .8 Optimal Cycl e: OPTIMIZED Level Of Ser vice: C ***k***#**#* *********#*#**** ***+** +#*#***#********#* ********k** ****** ***#* #***** Street Name: Day Creek Boule vard Wilson Avenue Approach: North Bound So uth Bound Ea st Bound We st Bo und Movement: L - T - R _ L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ___ ____________ Control:. I__________ ____ Permitted I ____________ Permitted Pr __________ otected I_____ Pr _____ otect _ _ ed Rights: Include Include ~ Include Inclu de Min. Green: 28 28 26 28 26 26 10 28 28 10 28 26 Lanes: 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 Volume Modul e: Base Vol: 26 432 66 98 395 5 19 15 19 182 3 62 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial 8se: 25 432 66 98 395 5 19 15 19 182 3 62 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PY.F P.dj: 0.62 0.62 0.62 0.57 0.57 0.57 0.59 0.59 0.59 0.68 0.66 0.68 • PHF Volume: 90 693 106 171 689 9 32 25 32 268 4 91 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 40 693 106 171 689 9 32 26 32 266 4 91 PCE Adj: 1.00 I.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 I.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 40 693 106 171 I 689 9 32 _______I_____ 25 32 __ I 268 _____ 4 _____ 91 _____I ____________ Saturation F _______________ low Module: Sat/Lane: 1800 1800 1600 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 Adjustment: 0.94 1.00 1.00 0.94 1.00 1.00 0.94 1.00 1.00 0.94 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.OD 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.98 0.02 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 1700 3600 1800 1700 I 3555 96 1700 _______I_____ 1800 1800 __________ 1700 _____ 1800 _____ 1800 _____ ____________ Capacity Ana _______________ lysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.02 0.19 0.06 0.10 0.19 0.19 0.02 0.01 0.02 0.16 0.00 0.05 Crit Moves: **** #*+* **** Green/Cycle: 0.35 0.35 0.35 0.35 0.35 0.35 0.15 0.35 0.35 0.23 0.42 0.42 Volume/Cap: 0.07 0.55 0.17 0.29 0.55 0.55 0.12 0.04 0.05 0.70 0.01 0.12 Delay/Veh: 16.6 21.5 17.5 18.9 21.5 21.5 30.4 16.2 16.3 38.8 11.6 12.5 User De 1Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 I.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00' AdjDel/Veh: 16.6 21.5 17.5 18.9 21.5 21.5 30.4 16.2 16.3 38.8 11.6 12.5 LOS by Move: 8 C B B C C C B B D B B HCM2kAVgQ: 1 7 2 3 7 7 1 0 0 8 0 1 Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. *********#** ***k********+*** *+*+#* ****************#* *********** *#***# ***** ****** Traffix 7.8.0115 (c) 2006 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA • Existing PM --- ---- Thu Mar 1, 2007 09:19:34 - - -Page 3=1 ___________ ____________ Wilson Avenue Extension Existing Evening Peak Hour _ _ _ __________ ____________ ________________________________________ Level Of Service Computation R _________ _ eport _ ___ _ 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) Intersection #1 Day Creek Boulevard (NS)/Wilson Aven ue (EW) *********#** *********#**************##************** *********#*#***** ******k**** Cycle (sec): 70 Critical vol ./Cap.(x): 0.155 Loss Time (s ec): 6 (Y+R=9.0 sec) Average Dela y (sec/veh): 16.5 Optimal Cycl e: OPTIMIZED Level Of Ser vice: B ******t**#*# *****##******#*#*#*********##*#**#*#*+** ******#*#**#*+*** *#*###*++#* Street Name: Day Creek Boulevard Wilson Avenue Approach: North Bound South Bound Ea st Bound We st Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Permitted Permitted Pr otected Pr otected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 28 28 28 28 26 28 30 28 28 10 28 28 Lanes: 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 ___________ ~ 1 1 0 __________ 1 0 I_____ 1 1 0 __________~ ____________ Volume Modul I_______________ _________ e: Base Vol: 21 69 147 10 94 1 1 1 9 71 2 6 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 21 89 197 10 94 1 1 1 9 71 2 6 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.80 0.80 0.80 • PHF Volume: 23 97 1fi0 14 129 1 2 2 B 89 2 7 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 23 97 160 14 129 1 2 2 B 89 2 7 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 23 97 160 14 129 1 2 2 B 89 2 7 Saturation F low Module: Sat/Lane: 1800 1800 1800 18D0 1800 1800 1600 1800 1800 1600 1800 1800 Adjustment: 0.94 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.94 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.OD 1.98 0.02 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 1700 3600 1600 1700 3562 38 1700 ___________ I 1600 1600 __________ 1700 I_____ 1800 1600 __ ____________ Capacity Ana I_______________ __ lysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.01 0.03 0.09 0.01 0.04 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.00 0.00 Crit Moves: **** **#* **#* Green/Cycle: 0.39 0.39 0.39 0.39 0.39 0.39 0.14 0.39 0.39 0.14 0.39 0.39 Volume/Cap: 0.03 0.07 0.23 0.02 0.09 0.09 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.37 0.00' 0.01 Delay/Veh: 12.4 12.6 14.1 12.3 12.8 12.8 26.8 12.2 12.3 32.7 12.2 12.3 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 12.9 12.6 19.1 12.3 12.6 12.6 26.6 12.2 12.3 32.7 12.2 12.3 LOS by Move: B B B B B B C B B C B B HCM2kAVgQ: 0 1 2 0 1 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 #**#***##**# #*******##****####*****************#**** **#****#*# ###**** **##******* Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. • Traff ix 7. 8.0115 (c) 2006 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA • Existing AM Thu Mar 1, 2007 09:19:13 --- Page 4=1 ___________ _______________________ Wilson Avenue Extension Existing Morning Peak Hour ________________________________________________________________________________ Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM 4-Way Stop Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******#********#*##k*******#*#k*k******##+******###*+******###*kk****#****#**#*# Intersection #2 Etiwanda Avenue-North Leg (NS)/Wilson Avenue (EW) +###******************##k*k*******###******#*#*k***********k****#*k*********##** Cycle (sec):_ 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.070 Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y+R=4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 7.7 Optimal Cyc 1e: 0 Level Of Service: A ********#*k**********#********##*********#**k****#****************************** Street Name: Etiwanda Avenue-North Leg Wilson Avenue Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ____________~_______________I_______________I_______________II_______________ Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 ____________ ___________ _____~I______________________________I Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 0 0 32 0 96 27 19 0 0 24 15 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial ~B Se: 0' 0 0 32 0 46 27 19 0 0 24 15 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 • PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.58 0.50 0.58 0.71 0.71 0.71 PHF Volume: 0 0 0 35 0 50 46 33 0 0 34 21 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 0 0 0 35 0 50 46 33 0 0 34 21 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 0 0 0 35 0 50 46 33 0 0 39 7.1 ____________~_______________I______________-I_______________II_______________ Saturation Flow Module: Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 1.23 0.77 Final Sat.: 0 0 0 664 0 851 666 1465 0 0 934 642 ___________________________~_______________I______________________________I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.05 xxxx 0.06 0.07 0.02 xxxx xxxx 0.09 0.03 Crit Moves: *##* *#** *#*k Delay/Veh: 0.0 0.0 0.0 8.3 0.0 7.1 8.4 7.6 0.0 0.0 7.5 7.1 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.OD 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.3 0.0 7.1 6.9 7.6 0.0 0.0 7.5 7.1 LOS by Move: * * * A * A A A * * A A AppxoachDel: xxxxxx 7.6 8.1 7.4 Delay Adj: xxxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 P.pprAdjDel: ~ xxxxxx 7.6 ~ B.1 7.9 LOS by Appr: * A A A Al1WayAvgQ: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. ****************************#**#****fi*k************#********************#******* Traff ix 7.8.0115 (c) 2006 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA • • Existing PM Thu Mar 1, 2007 09:19:34 Page 4-1 ________________________________________________________________________ Wilson Avenue Extension Existing Evening Peak Hour _____ _______________ ____________ ________________ Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM 4-Way Stop Method (Base Volume Alternativ e) ********#*** *#*******************************#***#**********#*# ****** ******##*** Intersection $2 Etiwanda Avenue-North Leg (NS)/Wilson Avenue (E W) *#******#*## *****##******************k*k****#****************** *****# z*###****** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.054 LOSS Time (s ec): 0 (Y+R=4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh) : 7.5 Optimal Cycl e: 0 Level Of Service: A Street Name: Etiwanda Avenue-North Leg Wilson Avenue Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound We st Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ______________ L - _____ T - R __________I ____________ Control: _______________I________________ Stop Sign Stop Sign Stop Sign St op Sign Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 Volume [dodul e: Base Vol: 0 0 0 2 0 16 32 32 0 0 31 11 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 0 0 2 0 16 32 32 0 0 31 11 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.66 D.66 0.06 0.87 0.87 0.87 • PHF Volume: 0 0 0 3 0 29 37 37 0 0 36 13 Redact Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 0 0 0 3 0 24 37 37 0 0 36 13 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 0 0 0 3 0 24 37 37 0 ___________ ~_______________I 0 _____ 36 13 ______ ___ ____________ Saturation F ___________ low Module: _ Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 1.48 0.52 Final Sat.: 0 0 0 667 0 859 694 1536 0 _____I______________________________ 0 I_ 1173 490 _______I ____________ Capacity Ana __________ lysis Module: Vol/Sat: xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.00 xxxx 0.03 0.05 0.02 xxxx xxxx 0.03 0.03 Crit Moves: **** **** "*** Delay/Veh: 0.0 0.0 0.0 8.0 0.0 6.9 B.1 7.5 0.0 0.0 7.3 7.1 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 0.0 0.0 8.0 0.0 6.9 8.1 7.5 0.0 0.0 7.3 7.1 LOS by Move: * * * A * A A A * A A' ApproachDel: xxxxxx 7.0 7.8 7.3 Delay Adj: xxxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 ApprAdjDel: xxxxxx 7.0 7.8 7.3 LOS by Appr: * A A A Al1WayAVgQ: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. • Traffix 7. 8.0115 (c) 2006 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA • Existing At9 --- Thu Mar 1, 2007 09:19:13 Page 5=1 Wilson Avenue Extension Existing _____________ Morning Peak Ho ______ __ ur ______________ ____ ___ _ ______ Level Of Service Computa tion Report 2 000 HCM Unsignali zed Method (Base Volume Altern ative) Intersection #3 Etiwanda Avenu e-South Leg (NS) /Wilson Avenue (EW) ++a++++.r<xx++ aae++~.tt+«,t~.ta~~~+< +<:.+:.x<,t+++:+t f;xf~+ke+x:t ~.e<rt~ ++<+x+ ~+<+x xxx xx<~+: Average Delay (sec/veh): 3.0 Level Of Service: A ~+.xxxxxx:e.t+ ~.t~~++.~.~~«.<.+« <.xx.x~~««.++~.t k+«+~~«+ax+~+ ~+<x++ .:~+x +<x x+.~<. Street Name: Etiwanda Avenu e-South Leg Wils on Ave nue Approach: North Bound ~ South Bound East Bound West Bo und Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Yield Sign Yield Sign Yield Sign Yield Si gn Lanes: 1 0 1 0 Volume Module : Base Vol: 39 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 51 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1.00 Initial Bse: 39 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 51 0 0 0 user Aaj: l.oo l.oo l.oo l.oo l.oo l.oo l.oo l.oo l. oo l. oo l. oo l.oo PHF Adj: 0.91 0.91 0.91 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.58 0.58 0. 58 0. 71 0. 71 0.71 PHF Volume: 43 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 87 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final Vol.: 43 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 87 0 0 0 PCE Module: AutoPCE: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TruckPCE: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ComboPCE: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 BicyclePCE: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 AdjVOlume: 0 0 0 _______________ 0 0 0 _______________I 0 0 _____________ 0 ____ 0 _____ 0 ___ 0 _____ ____ Delay Module: » Time Period: 0.25 hours « CircVolume: 0 0 0 0 MaxVOlume: 0 0 0 0 PedVOlume: 0 0 0 0 AdjMaxVOl: 0 0 0 0 ApproachVO1: 0 0 ~ 0 0 ApproachDel: 9.2 xxxxxx xxxxxx xxrx xx Queue: xxxx xxxx xxxx xx xx Traffix 7.8.0115 (c) 2006 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA •, • Existing PM ---Thu Mar 1, 2007 09:19:34- Page 5=1 ____________ ____________________ Wilson Avenue Extension Existing Evening Peak Hour ___________________________________ Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******k******#************************k**********************#****************** Intersection k3 Etiwanda Avenue-South Leg (NS)/Wilson Avenue (EW) ********#***#************#*******#*****#*************#********k****#***##******* Average Delay (sec/veh): 5.7 Level Of Service: A ****#**#********#k**#****##****##*********#**********#*#***********#***#***#**** Street Name: Etiwanda Avenue-South Leg Wilson Avenue Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Eound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ____________I____________________________________________________________I Control: Yield Sign Yield Sign Yield Sign Yield Sign Lanes: 1 0 1 0 ____________ Volume Module ____ : _____ - ___ ___I _ ____ _ ~____ ___~ _____ _____ _____I Base Vol: 42 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 34 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1 .00 1 .00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 42 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 34 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1 .00 1 .00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.67 0.67 0 .67 1 .00 1.00 1.00 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.67 0.87 0.87 PHF Volume: 63 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 40 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final Vol.: 63 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 40 0 0 0 ~PCE Module: AutoPCE: 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0' 0 0 0 TruckPCE: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ComboPCE: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 BicyclePCE: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 AdjVOlume: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Delay Module: » Time Period: 0 .25 hours « C ircVOlume: 0 0 0 0 MaxVOlume: 0 0 0 0 PedVolume: 0 0 0 0 AdjMaxVOl: 0 0 0 0 ApproachVO1: 0 0 0 0 ApproachDel: 9.3 xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx pueue: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx Traff ix 7.6.0115 (c) 2006 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA • • Existing AM --_ Thu Mar 1, 2007 09:19:13 Page 7-1 _________________ ____ Wilson Avenue Extension Existing Morning Peak Hour ___ ___________ ______ _ ____________ _____________________________ Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM 4-way Stop Method (Base Volume Alternative) Intersection $5 Wardman Bullock Road (NS)/Wilson Avenue (EW) Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Val./Cap.(X): 0.400 Loss Time (s ec): 0 (Y+R=4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh) : 10.3 Optimal Cycl e: 0 Level Of Service: ~ B Street Name: Wardman Bullock Road Wilson Avenue Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound We st Eound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ____________ L - I~_____ T - __ ____ R ___I ____________ Control: _______________~__________________ Stop Sign Stop Sign Stop Sign St _ op Sign Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 _______________I_______________ 1 0 _____ 0 0 _______ 1 _ _ ____________ Volume Modul ~_______________ e: - Base Vol: 0 60 243 15 24 0 0 0 0 174 0 24 -Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 .00 Initial Bse: 0 60 243 15 24 0 0 0 0 174 0 24 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 L.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 .00 PHF Adj: G.79 0.79 0.79 0.69 0.69 0.69 1.00 1.00 1.D0 0.81 0.81 0 .81 • PHF Volume: 0 76 306 22 35 0 0 0 0 214 0 30 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 0 76 306 22 35 0 0 0 0 214 0 30 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 .00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 .00 Final Vol.: 0 76 306 22 35 0 0 0 0 214 0 30 Saturation F low Module: Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 .00 Lanes: 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.36 0.62 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1 .00 Final Sat.: 0 664 766 292 387 0 0 0 0 ____________I_______________ I 581 ~_____ 0 _______ 714 ___ ____________ Capacity Ana ___ _______________ lysis Module: Vol/Sat: xxxx 0.11 0.40 0.09 0.09 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.37 xxxx 0 .04 Crit Moves: **** ***# **#* Delay/Veh: 0.0 8.6 10.2 9.0 9.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 11.9 0.0 7.7 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 .00 AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 8.6 10.2 9.0 9.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 11.9 0.0 7.7 LOS by Move: * A B A A * * * * B # A ApproachDel: 9.9 9.0 xxxxxx 11.9 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 xxxxx 1.00 AporAdjDel: 9.9 9.0 xxxxxx 11.4 LOS by Appr: A~ A * B Al1WayAVgQ: D.0 0.1 0.6 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 **##****#*** **#**#**##*****##*#***#*****#************#******## ****##* *k**##* ##*k Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. • Traffix 7. 8.0115 (c) 2006 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUtSZNAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA • Existing PM Thu Mar 1, 2007 09:19:39 _______________________________________________ Page 7-1 _________________ ____________ ____ Wilson Avenue Extension Existing - Evening Peak Hour _____________ ___ __ _ _ ____________ __ ___ _____________ Level. Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM 4-Way Stop Method (Base Volume Alternativ e) ***k******** *****#*************#*******************#**#*******# ****************# Intersection AS wardman Bullock Road (NS)/Wilson Avenue (EW) *#*#******** #********k*********##***##****#**#*#********#*****# *#**##k***#***#** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 1.057 Loss Time (s ec): 0 (Y+R=9.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh) : 98.3 Optimal Cycl e: 0 Level Of Service: E Street Name: Wardman Bullock Road Wilson Avenue Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound west Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Stoo Sign Stop Sign Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: ~ 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I~_______________I_______________I ____ 1 0 0 0 1 _______________~ ________ ____ VO1ume Modul __________ _ e: Base Vol: 0 27 269 14 61 0 0 0 0 443 0 30 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 27 269 14 61 0 0 0 0 443 0 30 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.OD 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.74 0.74 0.74 0.77 0.77 0.77 1.00 1.00 ~ 1.00 0.74 0.74 0.79 • PHF Volume: 0 36 363 18 79 0 0 0 0 596 0 40 Aeduct Vol: D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 0 36 363 18 79 0 0 0 0 596 0 40 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 0 36 363 18 79 0 0 0 0 ______~~_______________I_______________ I 596 0 40 _______________ ____________ Saturation F _________ low Module: Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.19 0.81 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 0 545 610 97 421 0 0 0 0 564 0 678 Capacity Ana lysis Module: Vol/Sat: xxxx 0.07 0.60 0.19 0.19 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 1.06 xxxx 0.06 Crit Moves: **** **** k### Delay/Veh: 0.0 9.8 16.8 11.4.11.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 78.5 0.0 8.2 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 9.8 16.8 11.4 11.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 76.5 0.0 8.2 LOS by Move: * A C B B * * * * F * A ApproachDel: 16.2 11.4 xxxxxx ~ 74.0 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 xxxxx 1.00 ApprAdjDel: 16.2 11.4 xxxxxx 74.0 LOS by Appr: C B * F Al1WayAVgQ: 0.0 0.1 1.4 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.0 ~0.0 0.0 10:9 0.0 0.1 *****#****** ********#*****#k************#*****************************#********* Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. ***#+**#**** k******k*******##***k*#***t*#*************#*k*#**** ****#***#*******# Traffix 7. 8.O1i5 (c) 2006 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMP.N ASSOC, ORANGE CA • • ~J Existing AM Thu Mar 1, 2007 09:19:13 _______ ______________________ Wilson Avenue Extension Existing Morning Peak Hour ___________________________________ Level Of Service Computation Report Page-8-1 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) *******************#*******************#************#****k*******##************* Intersection #6 Cherry Avenue (NS)/Wilson Avenue (EW) k**#******************************#**#*#*******++**+#**********#***#**#****#**** Cycle (sec): 95 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.834 Loss Time (sec): 8 (Y+R=4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 39.9 Optimal Cycle: OPTIMIZED Level Of Service: D ********k#*************#******#*#+**************k****************+******k*#k**** Street Name: Cherry Avenue Wilson Avenue Approach: North Hound South Bound East Bound west Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ___________________________I______________________________II_______________ Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 10 28 28 1~0 28 28 10 28 28 10 28 28 Lanes: 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 ___________________________~~_______________- ____ ___________________I Volume Module: Base Vol: 99 387 121 291 192 40 96 197 59 65 257 997 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 99 387 121 291 192 90 96 197 59 fi5 257 497 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.98 0.96 0.98 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.94 0.94 0.94 PHF Volume: 107 417 130 297 196 41 106 216 65 70 275 532 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 107 417 130 297 196 41 106 218 65 70 275 532 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.D0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 107 417 130 297 196 41 106 216 65 70 275 532 ___________________________I_____________________________________________ Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 160D 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 Adjustment: 0.94 1.00 1.00 0.94 1.00 1.00 0.94 1.00 1.00 0.94 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.54 0.46 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 1700 1800 1800 1700 1800 1600 1700 2770 830 17D0 1800 1800 ____________I_______________~I_______________________ _______________ Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.06 0.23 0.07 0.17 0.11 0.02 0.06 0.06 0.08 0.04 0.15 0.30 Crit Moves: ~**** **** **#* **,:* Green/Cycle: 0.13 0.29 0.29 0.19 0.36 0.36 0.11 0.32 0.32 0.11 0.32 0.32 Volume/Cap: 0.49 0.79 0.25 0.91 0.30 0.06 0.59 0.25 0.25 0.36 0.97 0.91 Delay/Veh: 46.2 91.6 26.3 .69.2 21.7 16.9 59.3 24.0 24.0 44.2 25.7 44.8 User De 1Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 96.2 91.6 26.3 69.2 21.7 16.9 54.3 24.0 24.0 44.2 25.7 44.8 LOS by Move: D D C E C B D C C D C D HCM2kAVgQ: 4 13 3 13 4 1 4 3 3 2 6 19 *************#***********************************##********tk**********k******** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. **+**********k##*******#************************k*********#*************k******* Traffix 7.8.0115 (c) 2006 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA • Existing PM Thu Mar 1, 2007 09: _____ ___________ 19:34 ~ - ____________ - Page 6=1 ____________ __ W ilson Avenue Extension Existing _ _ Evening Peak Hour ________________________________ _____ _____ ______ ___________ _______________ _ Level O ___ f Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operati ons Method (Base Volume Alternative ) #*****t***** *****#*********** *#**********************k********** **#** ***** ****** Intersection #6 Cherry Avenue (NS)/Wilson Ave nue (EW) *********k** **k*#k******#*k** ***********************##*#*****k** ***** ***## *#***# Cycle (sec): 105 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.5 76 Loss Time (s ec): 6 (Y+R =4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/vehj: 37 .9 Optimal Cycl e: OPTIMIZED Level Of Service: D **##t******# #+*****#********* ****##**#****************#********* **#** ***#* t***** Street Name: Cherry Avenue Wilson A venue Approach: North Bound ~ South Bound East Bound We st Bo und Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R _ ____II L - _____ T _____ - R _____I ____________ Control: _______________I Protected I_______________ Protected ________ __ Protected Pr otect ed Rights: Include Include Include Inclu de Min. Green: 10 26 28 10 26 28 10 28 26 10 28 28 Lanes: 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 Volume Modul e: Base Vol: 66 109 90 362 338 173 88 253 148 105 178 165 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 86 109 40 362 336 173 88 253 198 105 178 165 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.85 0.85 O.B6 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.78 0.78 0.78 • PHF Volume: 102 129 ~ 47 415 388 196 108 309 181 135 230 213 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D D 0 Reduced Vol: 102 129 47 415 388 198 108 309 181 135 230 213 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 102 129 97 _ 415 388 196 _______________ 106 309 181 I_______________ 135 _____ 230 _____ 213 _____ ____________ Saturation F I______________ low Module: Sat/Lane: 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1600 18D0 1800 1800 1800 Adjustment: 0.94 1.00 1.00 0.94 1.00 1.00 0.94 1.00 1.00 0.94 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.26 0.74 1.00 1.04 0.96 Final Sat.: 1700 1800 1800 1700 1800 1800 1700 2271 1329 1700 1868 1732 Capacity Ana lysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.06 0.07 0.03 0.24 0.22 0.11 0.06 0.14 0.14 0.08 0.12 0.12 Crit Moves: **** ***# **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.15 0.27 0.27 0.29 0.41 0.41 0.10 0.27 0.27 0.10 0.27 0.27 Volume/Cap: 0.41 0.27 0.10 0.63 0.52 0.27 0.66 0.51 0.51 0.83 0.46 0.46 Delay/Veh: 95.4 31.8 29.4 48.9 22.9 16.7 65.2 34.6 34.6 83.0 33.7 33.7 User De1Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDe1/Veh: 95.4 31.6 29.4 46.9 22.9 16.7 65.2 34.6 34.6 63.0 33.7 33.7 LOS by Move: D C C D C B E C C F C C HCM2kAvgQ: 3 3 1 15 8 3 5 7 7 7 6 6 Note:. Queue reported is the n umber of cars per lane. • Traff ix 7.6.0115 (c) 2006 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA Year 2030 • Year 2030 A19 Thu Max 1, 2007 09:26:06 Page 3-1 _____________________________________________________________________________ Wilson Avenue Extension Year 2030 Morning Peak Hour ________________________________________________________________________________ -Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) *#*#************k**********###*#********t#*******#**#*##*##******************#** Intersection #1 Day Creek Boulevard (NS)/Wilson Avenue (EW) Cycle (sec): 85 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): ~ 0.346 Loss Time (sec): 6 (Y+R=4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 23.9 Optimal Cycle: OPTIMIZED Level O£ Service: C • Street Name: Day Creek Boulevard Wilson Avenue Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound west Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R __._________________________I______________________________I_______________ Control: Permitted Permitted Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 28 28 28 28 28 28 10 28 26 10 28 28 Lanes: 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 ___________________________________________ ______II_______________I Volume Module: Rase Vol: 21 426 73 109 431 4 20 18 22 327 4 102 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 21 426 73 109 431 4 - 20 18 22 327 4 102 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • PasserByVo 1: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 21 428 73 109 431 4 20 16 22 327 4 102 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 PHF Volume: 22 451 77 115 954 4 21 19 23 344 4 107 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 22 451 77 115 454 4 21 19 23 344 9 107 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 22 451 77 115 454 4 21 19 23 344 4 107 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.96 0.02 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 1800 3800 1900 1800 3765 35 1800 1900 1900 1800 1900 1900 ______________________________________________ __________________I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.01 0.12 0.04 0.06 0.12 0.12 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.19 0.00 0.06 Crit Moves: **** **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.16 0.33 0.33 0.27 0.99 0.44 Volume/Cap: 0.04 0.36 0.12 0.19 0.37 0.37 0.07 0.03 0.04 0.71 0.01 0.13 Delay/Veh: 18.7 21.7 19.6 20.9 21.7 21.7 31.0 18.6 18.7 36.3 11.2 12.2 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 18.7 21.7 19.6 20.9 21.7 21.7 31.0 18.6 18.7 36.3 11.2 12.2 LOS by Move: B C B C C C C B B D B B HCM2kAvgQ: ~ 0 4 1 2 4 4 1 0 0 10 0 1 ***i*t************##****#*##***#********#*i***********k****#************#i#***** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. Traff ix 7.8.0115 (c) 2006 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA • • Year 2030 PM Thu Mar 1, 2007 09:26:21 Page 3-1 Wilson Avenue Extension Year 2030 Evening Peak Hour ________________________________________________________________________________ Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) *********************#******************************#**********}***k*#********** Intersection #1 Day Creek Boulevard (NS)/Wilson Avenue (EW) *###**#*#*****#**##*****##***#**#******}****##****#**###}*****#*****#*****##**** Cycle (sec): 95 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.261 Loss Time (sec): 6 (Y+R=4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 18.1 Optimal Cycle: OPTIMIZED Level O£.S ervice: B **************k*************#}**********#***k**************************#******`k* Street Name: Day Creek Boulevard Wilson Avenue Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound west Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ___________________________I______________________________I_______________ Control: Permitted Permitted Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 28 28 28 28 26 28 10 28 28 10 28 26 Lanes: 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 ____________~_______________~______________________________I_______________ Volume Module: Base Vol: 18 101 313 15 94 1 1 2 6 119 2 6 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 18 101 313 15 94 1 1 2 6 119 2 8 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 18 101 313 15 99 1 1 2 6 119 2 8 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 PHF Volume: 19 106 329 16 99 1 1 2 6 125 2 B Reduct Voi: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 19 106 329 16 99 1 1 2 6 125 2 6 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00.1. 0~0 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 19 106 329 16 99 1 1 2 6 125 2 6 ___________________________I_______________I_______________I_______________I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.98 0.02 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 1800 3600 1900 1800 3760 40 1800 1900 1900 1800 1900 1900 ___________________________.I_____________________________________________ Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.01 0.03 0.17 0.01 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.07 0.00 0.00 Crit Moves: **** *}#* **** Green/Cycle: 0.46 0.96 0.46 0.46 0.46 0.46 0.13 0.29 0.29 0.18 0.35 0.35 Volume/Cap: 0.02 0.06 0.38 0.02 0.06 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.36 0.00 0.01 Delay/Veh: 11.7 11.9 15.2 11.7 11.9 11.9 36.3 23.4 23.5 37.3 18.8 18.8 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Del/Veh: 11.7 11.9 15.2 11.7 11.9 11.9 36.3 23.9 23.5 37.3 16.8 18.8 LOS by Move: B B B B B B D C C D B B HCM2kAvgQ: 0 1 5 0 1 1 0 0 0 3 0 0 ****}t*******###**x*t******}****#********#****##****#}****i,****k**********k****# Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. Traffix 7.6.0115 (c) 2006 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA • • Year 2030 AM -Thu Mar 1, 2007 09:26:06 - - Page 9=1 Wilson Avenue Extension Year 2030 ________ __________________ Morning Peak Hou _________________ r ________________ ______ _______ ____ ____ Level Of Service Computat ion Report 2000 HCM 9-Way Sto p Method (Future Volume Alternati ve) Intersection #2 Etiwanda Avenu e-North Leg (NS)/ Wilson Avenue (E W) *#********** ******k****#**k*** ***#************* **********#*#*** ****** ***k*** **** Cycle (sec): 100 Critica l Vol./Cap.(X): 0.155 Loss Time (s ecj: 0 (Y+R= 4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh) : 8.3 Optimal Cycl e: 0 Level O f Service: A Street Name: Etiwanda Avenu e-North Leg Wilson Avenue Approach: North Bound South Bound East Hound We st Bound Movement: ~ L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - __ __ R _I ____________ Control: _______________II Stop Sign _______________ Stop Sign _______________ Stop Sign _____ St _ _ _ op Sign __ Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 0 0 0 0 0 ~I 1 0 0 0 1 I 1 0 2 0 0 _______________~ 0 0 I_____ 1 1 _______ 0 ___I ____________ Volume Modul _______________ e: Base Vol: 0 0 0 71 0 114 38 91 0 0 97 32 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 .00 initial Bse: 0 0 0 71 0 114 38 91 0 0 97 32 Added Vol: 0 D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVO1: 0 0 U 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • Initial Fut: 0 0 0 71 0 114 38 91 0 0 97 32 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 .00 PHF Adj: 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0 .95 PHF Volume: 0 0 0 75 0 120 40 96 0 0 102 34 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 0 0 0 75 ~ 0 120 40 96 0 0 102 34 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 .00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 .00 Final Vol.: 0 0 0 _ 75 0 120 ______________ 40 96 0 _______________I 0 _____ 102 _______ 34 ___ ____________ Saturation F I____________ __ low Module: _ Adjustment: 1.00 7..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.OD 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 .00 Lanes: 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 1.50 0 .50 Final Sat.: 0 0 0 618 0 777 603 1318 0 0 1099 362 Capacity Ana lysis Module: Vol/Sat: xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.12 xxxx 0.15 0.07 0.07 xxxx xxxx 0.10 0 .09 Crit Moves: **** **** ##** Delay/Veh: 0.0 0.0 0.0 9.1 0.0 ~ 7.9 8.9 8.4 0.0 0.0 6.2 7.9 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 .00 AdjDe1/Veh: 0.0 0.0 0.0 9.1 0.0 7.9 8.9 8.4 0.0 0.0 6.2 7.9 LOS by ldove: * * * A * A A A * * A A Approac hDel: xxxxxx 8.9 8.5 8.1 Delay Adj: xxxxx 1.D0 1.00 1.00 ApprAdj Del: xxxxxx 6.4 8.5 8.1 LOS by Appr: * A A A Al1WayAvgQ: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 • Traffix 7. 8.0115 (c) 2006 Do wling Assoc. Lice nsed to RUNZNAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA • Year 2030 PM Thu Mar 1, 2007 09:2fi:21 Page 9-1 Wilson Avenue Extension Year 2030 Evening Peak Ho _________ __ ur ____________________ ___ ___________ ____________ ________________ Level ___ ____ Of Service Computa tion Report 2000 HCM 9-Way S top Method (Future Volume Alternative) ***#***#**#* ***#**##*t****** ****************** *#***************k** *** *****#***** Intersection #2 Etiwanda Ave nue-North Leg (NH) /Wilson Avenue (EW) Cycle (sec): 100 Critic al Vol./Cap.(X): 0.123 Loss Time (s ec): 0 (Y+ R=4.0 sec) Averag e Delay (sec /veh): 8.2 Optimal Cycl e: 0 Level Of Service: A *******#*#** ************###+ **#*******+##t*#** *#**************#**# #*# *********** Street Name: Etiwanda Ave nue-North Leg Wilson-Ave nue Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound We st Hound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R ' L - T - R L ____I__ _ - T - R ___I ____________ Control: _______________ Stop Sign I________ Stop Sign _________ _ Stop Sign St op Sign Rights: Include Include include ~ Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 Volume Modul e: Base Vol: 0 0 0 28 0 52 75 118 0 0 97 32 Grocath Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1. 00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 0 0 28 0 52 75 118 0 0 97 32 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • Initial Fut: 0 0 0 26 0 52 75 118 0 0 97 32 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1. 00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0. 95 0.95 0.95 PHF Volume: 0 0 0 29 0 55 79 129 0 0 102 34 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0~ 0 0 0 0 0 ~ 0~ 0 Reduced Vol: 0 0 0 29 0 55' 79 124 0 0 102 34 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1. 00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1. 00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 0 0 0 29 0 55 ______ I 79 124 0 I_________________ 0 ___ 102 34 __________ ___.________ Saturation F I_______________ low Module: _ Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1. 00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 0.00 0. 00 1.50 0.50 Final Sat.: 0 0 ~ 0 598 0 746 I 644 1415 0 ________________ 0 ___ 1109 384 __________ ____________ Capacity Ana _______________ lysis Module: I_______________ _ Vol/Sat: xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.05 xxxx .0.07 0.12 0.09 xxxx xx xx 0.09 0.09 Crit MOVeS: **** ##** **** Delay/Veh: 0.0 0.0 0.0 8.8 0.0 7.6 8.9 8.2 0.0 0 .0 7.9 7.7 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1. 00 1.00 1.00 AdjDe1/Veh: 0.0 0.0 ~ 0.0 8.6 0.0 7.6 8.9 6.2 0.0 0 .0 7.9 7.7 LOS by Move: - * * * A * A A A # * A A ApproachDel: xxxxxx 8.0 8.5 7.9 Delay Adj: xxxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 ApprAdjDel: xxxxxx B.0 8.5 7.9 LOS by Appr: * A A A Al1WayAVgQ: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0 .0 0.1 0.1 *#+##******* **#t#******#*t** ##*************t** **#*#************##+ #** *#********* • Traffix 7. 8.0115 (c) 2006 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASS OC, ORANGE CA • Year 2030 AM Thu Mar 1, 2007 09-26:06 Page 5-1 Wilson Avenue Extension Year 2030 Morning Peak Hour ______________________ _________________________________________________ Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative) ***#**#*#*************##******************************k***#*#*#*****##********** Intersection #3 Etiwanda Avenue-South Leg (NS)/Wilson Avenue (EW) Average Delay (sec/veh): 1.6 Worst Case Level Of Service: A[ 9.9] Street Name: Etiwanda Avenue-South Leg Wilson Avenue Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R _________________________________________________________I_______________ Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Rights: Include Include ~ Include Include Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 2 0 0 Volume Module: Base Vol: 18 D 31 0 0 0 0 125 37 11 111 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 18 0 31 0 0 0 0 125 37 11 111 '0 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVOl: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 18 0 31 0 0 0 0 125 37 11 111 0 User Adj: ~ 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1'.00 • PHF Adj: 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 PHF Volume: 19 0 33 0 0 0 0 132 39 12 117 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final Vol.: 19 0 33 0 0 0 0 132 39 12 117 0 Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp: 6.8 xxxx 6.9 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 4.1 xxxx xxxxx Fo1lowUpTim: 3.5 xxxx 3.3 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 2.2 xxxx xxxxx Capacity Module: Cnf lict Vol: 233 xxxx OS xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 171 xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: 741 xxxx 963 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1919 xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: 736 xxxx 963 rxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1419 xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap: 0.03 xxxx 0.03 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.01 xxxx xxxx Level Of Service Module: 2Way95thQ: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxxx Control Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 7.6 xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: * * + * * * +. + * A Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx 865 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx 0.2 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx 9.4 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * A * * * * * * * * * * Approac hDel: 9.9 xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx ApproachLOS: A ~ * * * Note: Queue reported is the number ~of cars per lane. Traff ix 7.6.0115 (c) 2006 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to RUNZNAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA • `• Year 2030 PM Thu Mar 1, 2007 09-26:21 - Page 5=1 - Wilson Avenue Extension Year 2030 Evening Peak Hour _____________________________ ______ ___________ ____________ ______________________ Level Of Service Computation Report 2 000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative) ****##*****# #***#********t***k******#*************************# ****** *****#****# Intersection #3 Etiwanda Avenue-South Leg (NS)/Wilson Avenue (EW) - ************ **********#*********#***s******************+******* ****** *********** Average Delay (sec/veh): 2.8 worst Case Level Of Service: B[ 10.5] ************ *******#******************************#*******##**#****** ***#******* Street Name: Etiwanda Avenue-South Leg Wilson Avenue Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R I_______________I L - _____ T - R __________ ____________ Control: _______________I_______________ Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 ______________~_______________~_______________ I 1 0 _____ 2 0 0 __________ ____________ Volume Modul _ e: Base Vol: 89 0 34 0 0 0 0 127 19 12 110 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 84 0 34 0 0 0 0 127 19 12 110 0 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVOl: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 89 0 34 0 0 0 0 127 19 12 110 0 Usei Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.95 0.95 10.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 • PHF Volume: 88 0 3 0 0 0 0 134 20 13 116 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final Vol.: 00 0 3 0 0 0 0 134 20 13 116 0 Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp: 6.8 xxxx 6.9 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 9.1 xxxx xxxxx Fo1lowUpTim: 3.5 xxxx 3.3 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx ____________I_______________ I__ 2.2 _____ xxxx xxxxx __________I ____________ Capacity Mod _ _______________ ule: Cnf lict Vol: 227 xxxx 77 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 154 xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: 747 xxxx 975 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1439 xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: 792 xxxx 975 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1439 xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap: 0.12 xxxx 0.00 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx _______~_______________ I 0.01 '_____ xxxx xxxx __________ ____________ Level Of Ser ________ ~_______________ vice Module: , 2Way96thQ: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxxx Control Del: xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx rxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 7.5 xxxx xxxxx LOS by_MOVe: * * * * * * * # # A # * Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx 798 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue: xxxxx 0.4 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd ConDel: xxxxx 10.5 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * B * * * * * * * # * * Approac hDel: 10.5 xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx ApproachLOS: B * * * ***k******** **********#***k*********************************** ******##*******#** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. • Traff ix 7.8.0115 (c) 2006 Dowling 'ASSOC. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA • Year 2030 AM Thu Mar 1, 2007 09:26:06 Page 6-1 Wilson Avenue Extension Year 2030 Morning Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume ALternative) Intersection #4 East Avenue (NS)/Wilson Avenue (EW) #*####*************#**#*****k********+*#**********+******t********************** Average Delay (sec/veh): 5.0 Worst Case Level Of Service: B[ 11.0] ***#******ii***#**********************#**********#*************#k**********k***** Street Name: East Avenue Wilson Avenue Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound west Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R _______________________________________________ _I_______________ Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 Volume Module: Base Vol: 1 19 19 16 71 6 1 78 1 24 79 11 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 1 19 19 16 71 6 1 78 1 24 74 11 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVO1: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 1 19 19 16 71 6 1 78 1 24 79 11 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 • PHF Adj: 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 PHF Volume: 1 20 20 17 75 6 1 62 1 25 78 12 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final Vol.: 1 20 20 17 75 6 1 82 1 25 78 12 Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp: 7.5 6.5 6.9 7.5 6.5 6.9 4.1 xxxx xxxxx 4.1 xxxx xxxxx Fo1lowUpT im: 3.5 9.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 2.2 xxxx xxxxx 2.2 xxxx xxxxx Capacity Module: Cnflict Vo 1: 212 225 42 187 219 45 89 xxxx xxxxx 83 xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: 732 676 1027 761 682 1022 1519 xxxx xxxxx 1527 xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: 657 666 1027 720 671 1022 1519 xxxx xxxxx 1527 xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.03 0.02 0.02 0.11 0.01 0.00 xxxx xxxx 0.02 xxxx xxxx ___________________________I______________________________I_______________I Level Of Service Module: 2Way95thQ: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxxx 0.1 xxxx xxxxx Control Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 7.9 xxxx xxxxx 7.4 xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: * * * * * * A * * A * * Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT -Shared Cap.: xxxx 803 xxxxx xxxx 694 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx ShareclQueue:xxxxx 0.2 xxxxx xxxxx 0.5 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx r, Shrd ConDel:xxxxx 9.7 xxxxx xxxxx 11.0 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * A * * B * * * * " * + ApproachDel: 9.7 11.0 xxxxxx xxxxxx ApproachLOS: A B * + Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. Traffix 7.8.0115 (c) 2006 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA • • Year 2030 PM Thu Mar 1, 2007 09:26:21 Page 6=1 Wilson Avenue Extension Year 2030 Evening Peak Ho _____ ur ______ ___________ ______ __ ____________________________ Level ____ Of Service Computa tion R eport 2000 HCM Unsignal ized Method (Futur e Volu me Alternative) ****k************k**k******* #***************** **k*** ***#*#*****k***#* ##*** ****** Intersection #4 East Avenue (NS)/Wilson Avenue (EW) ********##****###******kx*k* ****************** *****k ***************** ***** ****** Average Delay (sec/veh): 5.8 Worst Case L evel Of Service: B[ 11 .9] ***********************#**** *****#********k*** ***#** ****k************ ***** ****** Street Name: East Avenue Wilson Avenue Approach: North Bound South Bound Ea st Bound We st Bo und Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - _____ T _____ - R _____ ___________________________ Control: Stop Sign _______________I Stop Sign ~_____ Unc __________ ontrolled Unc ontro lled Rights: Include Include Include Inclu de Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 ____________I I 1 0 ~_____ 1 1 0 __________~ 1 0 _____ 1 _____ 1 0 _____ ___________________________ Volume Module: ___ Base Vol: 3 81 54 30 49 3 6 120 3 23 76 22 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 3 81 54 30 49 3 6 120 3 23 76 22 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVOl: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 3 81 54 30 49 3 6 120 3 23 76 22 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 • PHF Volume: 3 85 57 32 46 3 6 126 3 24 80 23 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final Vol.: 3 85 57 32 46 3 6 126 3 24 BO 23 Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp: 7.5 6.5 6.9 7.5 6.5 G.9 9.1 xxxx xxxxx 4.1 xxxx xxxxx Fo1lowUpTim: 3.5 9.0 3.3 3.5 9.0 3.3 7..2 xxxx xxxxx 2.2 ~_ ___ xxxx _____ xxxxx _____~ ___________________________ Capacity Module: II_______________ I_____ __________ _ Cnflict Vol: 252 292 65 258 282 52 103 xxxx xxxxx 129 xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: 686 622 992 679 630 1012 1501 xxxx xxxxx 1969 xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: 635 609 992 563 617 1012 1501 xxxx xxxxx 1969 xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.14 0.06 0.06 0.08 0.00 0.00 xxxx xxxx 0.02 _ I xxxx ___ xxxx _____ ____________~_______________ Level Of Service Module: ~__ _=_ ~_____ __________ ____ __ 2way95thQ: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxxx 0.1 xxxx xxxxx Control Del:xxxxx xxxx xrxxx xxxxx rxxx xxxxx 7.4 xxxx xxxxx 7.5 xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: * * * * * * A * * A * * . Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx 718 xxxxx xxxx 603 xxxxx xxxr, xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx 0.6 xxxxx xxxxx 0.5 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx 11.3 xxxxx xxxxx 11.9 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * B * * B ApproachDel: 11.3 11.9 xx xxxx xx xxxx ApproachL05: B H ******#********##h**L******# ***k*k*k*****#**** *k#**k ***************** ****# *k**** Note: Queue reported is the number o£ cars per lane. • Traffix 7.8.0115 (c) 2006 Dowling Assoc. Lic ensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORAN GE CA • Year 2030 AM Thu Mar 1, 2007 09:26:06 Page 7-1 Wilson Avenue Extension Year 2030 Morning Peak Hour ________________________________________________________________________________ Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM 4-Way Stop Method (Future Volume Alternative) *********#*k*##******##*#********#*****************************#**************Y[* Intersection k5 Wardman Bullock Road (NS)/Wilson Avenue (EW) Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.262 Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y+R=4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 10.0 Optimal Cycle: 0 Level Of Service: B ##**k***#******************t*********#***##**#***##******#*#****##************** Street Name: Wardman Bullock Road Wilson Avenue Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound west Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ____________I_______________II______________________________~_______________ Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 _________________________________________________________I_______________ Volume Module: Base Vol: 15 54 154 47 29 3 1 152 3 136 167 45 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 15 54 154 47 29 3 1 152 3 136 167 45 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • PasserByVOl: 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 15 59 154 97 29 3 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 PHF Volume: 16 57 162 49 31 3 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 16 57 162 49 31 3 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 16 57 162 99 31 3 ____________~_______________I_______________ Saturation Flow Module: Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.59 0.37 0.04 Final Sat.: 526 569 693 321 198 21 ___________________________~I_______________ Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.03 0.10 0.25 0.15 0.15 0.15 Crit Moves: **** *#** Delay/Veh: 9.9 9.3 9.7 10.3 10.3 10.3 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 9.4 9.3 9.7 10.3 10.3 10.3 LOS by Move: A A A B B B ApproachDel: 9.6 10.3 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 ApprAdjDel: _ 9.6 10.3 LOS by Appi: A ~ B Al1WayAvgQ: 0.0 0.1 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 ***#*#**#***##*k***t*****s*********#*****#*** 0 0 0 1 152 3 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.95 1 160 3 0 0 0 1 160 3 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 160 3 I_______________ 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.96 0.04 509 1070 21 o.oo o.1s o.ls *#** 9.5 10.0 9.9 1.00 1.00 1.00 9.5 10.0 9.9 A A A 10.0 1.00 10.0 A 0.0 0.2 0.2 0 0 0 136 167 45 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.95 143 176 47 0 0 0 143 176 47 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 143 176 47 _______________I 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.56 0.42 547 999 264 _______________I 0.26 0.19 0.18 #*** 11.2 9.7 9.4 1.00 1.00 1.00 11.2 9.7 9.4 B A A 10.2 1.00 10.2 B 0.3 0.2 0.2 • Traff ix 7.8.0115 (c) 2006 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA • Year 2030 PM Thu Mar 1, 2007 09:26:21 Page-7=1 Wilson Avenue Extension Year 2030 Evening Peak Hour _________________ ___________ ______ ___________ ____________ ______ ____________ Level O£ _____ Service Computation R eport 2000 H CM 4-Way Sto p Method (Future Volum e Alternati ve) Intersection #5 Wa rdman Bulloc k Road (NS)/Wilson Ave nue (EW) **++******** ###*#* k*********** *****+##*************# *****k***#******* ***#*k***** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol ./Cap.(X): 0.720 Loss Time (s ec): 0 (Y+R= 9.0 sec) Average Dela y (sec/veh): 15.4 Optimal Cycl e: 0 Level Of Ser vice: C Street Name: Wardman Bul lock Road Wilson Avenue Approach: Nor th Bound South Bound Ea st Bound We st Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - ___ T - R __________ L - _____ T - R __________ _ ____ Control: _____ St __________I op Sign _________________ Stop Sign St op sign St op Sign Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 1 0 1 __ _I 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 ____________________ 1 1 0 __________ 1 0 _____ 1 1 0 __________ ____________ Volume Modul _____ e: ______ _ ease Vol: 9 57 132 38 71 1 2 180 22 364 113 50 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 9 57 132 38 71 1 2 180 22 364 113 50 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVOl: U 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • Initial Fut: 9 57 132 38 71 1 2 180 22 364 113 50 User Adj: 1.OD 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 PHF Volume: 9 60 139 90 75 1 2 169 23 383 119 53 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 9 60 139 40 75 1 ~ 2 169 23 383 119 53 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.OD 1.00 Final Vol.: 9 60 139 40 75 1 2 ___________I~_____ 169 23 __________ 383 _____ 119 53 __________~ ____________ Saturation F _____ low Mo __________ dule: ____ Adjustment: 1.D0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.34 0.65 0.01 1.00 1.78 0.22 1.00 1.39 0.61 Final Sat.: 465 499 554 168 313 9 960 ____________I_____ _ 690 110 __________ 532 _____ 604 3'74 __________ ____________ Capacity Ana _____ lysis __________ Module: __ Vol/Sat: 0.02 0.12 0.25 0.24 0.24 D.24 0.00 0.21 0.21 0.72 0.15 0.14 Crit Moves: **** *#** **** *#** Delay/Veh: 10.1 10.3 10.6 11.9 11.9 11.9 10.1 11.2 11.1 29.0 9.8 9.3 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Del/Veh: 10.1 10.3 10.6 11.9 11.9 11.9 10.1 11.2 11.1 24.0 9.8 9.3 LOS by Move: B B~ B B B B B B B C A A ApproachDe l: 10.5 11.9 11.2 19.5 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ApprAdjDel: _ 10.5 11.9 11.2 19.5 LOS by Appr: II B B C A11WayAVgQ: 0.0 0.1 D.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.0 0.2 0.2 Z.2 0.2 0.2 • Traffix~7. 8.0115 (c) 2006 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA • Year 2030 AM Thu Mar 1, 2007 09:33:07 Page 7=1 _______________________________________________________ ____ Wilson Avenue Extension Year 2030 Morning Peak Hour - With Improvements ------- --------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #5 Wardman Bullock Road (NS)/Wilson Avenue (EW) ***#****###******i******#*******************#***k*********#*********#*********** Cycle (sec): 60 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.154 Loss Time (sec): 4 (Y+R=4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 7.6 Optimal Cycle: OPTIMIZED Level Of Service: A Street Name: Wardman Bullock Road Wilson Avenue Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ___________________________~_______________I_______________________ Control: Permitted Permitted Permitted Permitted Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 10 28 28 10 28 28 10 28 28 10 26 28 Lanes: 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 ___________________________~_______________I_______________II_______________ Volume Module: Base Vol: 15 54 154 47 29 3 1 152 3 136 167 45 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 15 54 159 47 29 3 1 152 3 136 167 45 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • PasserByVOl: 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 15 54 154 .47 29 3 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 .1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 PHF Volume: 16 57 162 49 31 3 Redact Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 16 57 162 49 31 3 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 16 57 162 99 31 3 ___________________________I_ _______ Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.61 0.35 0.04 Final Sat.: 1800 1900 1900 1094 675 70 ____________~_______________,I _______________I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.01 0.03 0.09 0.05 0.05 0.05 Crit Moves: **** Green/Cycle: 0.97 0.47 0.47 D.47 0.47 0.47 Volume/Cap: O.D2 0.06 0.18 0.10 0.10 0.10 Delay/Veh: 7,1 7.3 8.1 7.5 7.5 7.5 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.D0 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 7.1 7.3 8.1 7.5 7.5 7.5 LOS by I4ove: A A A A A A HCM2kAvgQ: 0 0 1 1 1 1 Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per 0 0 1 152 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 1 160 0 0 1 160 1.00 l.OD 1.00 1.00 1 160 1900 1900 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.96 1800 3726 0.00 0.04 0.47 0.47 O.DO 0.09 7.0 7.4 1.00 1.00 7.0 7.9 A A 0 1 lane. 0 0 0 0 3 136 167 45 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 3 193 176 47 0 0 0 0 3 143 176 47 1.00 1.OD 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.D0 1.00 1.00 3 143 176 47 _____________________I 1900 1900 19D0 1900 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.04 1.00 1.56 0.42 79 1800 2993 807 0.04 0.08 0.06 0.06 **k* 0.47 0.97 0.47 0.47 0.09 0.17 0.13 0.13 7.4 6.0 7.5 7.5 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 7.4 B.0 7.5 7.5 A A A A 1 1 1 1 k***************#******* Traffix 7.8.0115 (c) 2006 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA • .• Year 2030 PM Thu Mar 1, 2007 09:33:25 Page 7=1 _________________________ ________________ _ Wilson Avenue Extension Year 2030 Evening Peak Hour - With Improvements ________________________________________________________________________________ Level Ot Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) *####**#************#***#***#*************#**#**********#*}t#***********#******* Intersection #5 Wardman Bullock Road (NS)/Wilson Avenue (EW) ***********#**#**********##****#*##*#####*#*****##**#*#****#***#*******#******** Cycle (sec): 60 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.138 Loss Time (sec): 4 (Y+R=9.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): B.6 Optimal Cycle: OPTIMIZED Level Of Service: A Street Name: [aardman Bullock Road Wilson, Avenue Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound west Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ____________I_______________I___ ____I_______________I_______________ Control: Permitted Permitted Permitted Permitted Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 10 28 28 10 28 26 10 28 28 10 28 28 Lanes: 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 Volume Module: Base Vol: 9 57 132 36 71 1 2 180 22 364 113 50 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 9 57 132 38 71 1 2 180 22 369 113 50 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0~ 0 0 0 • Passer8yVO1: 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 9 57 132 38 71 1 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.D0 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 PHF Volume: 9 60 139 40 75 1 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 9 60 139 40 75 1 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.D0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 9 60 139 40 75 1 ___________________________I_______________I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.36 0.63 0.01 Final Sat.: 1800 1900 1900 644 1203 17 ____________I_______________I_______________ Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.01 0.03 0.07 0.06 0.06 0.06 Crit Moves: **** Green/Cycle: 0.97 0.47 0.47 0.47 0.47 0.47 Volume/Cap: O.D1 0.07 0.16 0.13 0.13 0.13 Delay/Veh: 7.0 7.3 7.9 7.7 7.7 7.7 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 7.0 7.3 7.9 7.7 7.7 7.7 LOS by Move: A A A A A A HCM2kAVgQ: D 0 1 1 1 1 ***s*******#****t*****#*********************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per 0 0 2 180 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 2 189 0 0 2 189 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2 189 1900 1900 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.78 1800 3386 0.00 0.06 *k** 0.47 0.47 0.00 0.12 7.0 7.5 1.00 1.00 7.0 7.5 A A 0 1 F********#* lane. 0 0 0 0 22 364 113 50 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 23 363 119 53 0 0 0 0 23 383 119 53 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 23 383 119 53 1900 1900 1900 1900 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.22 1.00 1.39 0.61 414 1800 2634 1166 ____________________I 0.06 0.21 0~. 05 0.05 0.97 0.47 0.47 0.47 0.12 0.46 0.10 0.10 7.5 10.6 7.4 7.4 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 7.6 10.6 7.4 7.4 A B A A 1 4 1 1 k*t****#*#*********#*** Tr affix 7.6.0115 (c) 2006 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to RUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA • • Year 2030 AM Thu Mar 1, 2007 09:26:06 - Page-6=1 ____________ _______ Wilson Avenue Extension Year 2030 Morning Peak Hour ________________________________________________________________________________ Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #6 Cherry Avenue (NS)/W~i lson Avenue (EW) Cycle (sec): 95 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.826 Loss Time (sec): B (Y+R=4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 38.6 Optimal Cycle: OPTIMIZED Level Of Service: D ***#********;**Ir***********#******k*************************##***********#******' Street Name: Cherry Avenue Wilson Avenue Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound west Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R __________________________________________I______________________________~ Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 10 26 28 10 28 28 10 28 26 10 28 28 Lanes: 1 D 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0. 1 1 0 __________._________________I____ ___I_______________I_____ _I Volume Module: Base Vol: 136 398 142 278 251 45 188 940 181 97 329 975 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 initial Bse: 136 396 142 278 251 95 188 440 181 97 329 975 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • PasserByVOl: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 136 398 142 278 Z51 45 16II 44D 181 97 329 475 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 PHF Volume: 193 419 149 293 2G4 97 198 463 191 102 396 500 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 143 419 149 293 264 47 198 463 191 102 346 500 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.D0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 143 919 149 293 264 47 198 463 191 102 346 500 ____________I______________________________~_______________~_______________~ Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.OD 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.42 0.56 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 1800 1900 1900 1600 1900 1900 1800 2692 1108 1800 1900 1900 ____________I_______________I______________________________I_______________ Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.08 0.22 0.06 0.16 0.14 0.02 0.11 0.17 0.17 0.06 0.18 0.26 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.13 0.29 0.29 0.19 0.36 0.36 0.13 0.32 0.32 0.11 0.31 0.31 Volume/Cap: 0.63 0.75 0.27 0.66 0.39 0.07 0.86 0.54 0.59 0.50 0.60 0.86 Delay/Veh: 51.6 38.9 26.5 61.3 23.2 19.1 73.0 27.6 27.6 46.0 29.4 90.5 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Del/Veh: 51.6 38.9 26.5 61.3 23.2 19.1 73.0 27.6 27.6 48.0 29.4 90.5' LOS by Move: D D C E C B E C C D C D HCM2kAvgQ: 5 12 3 12 5 1 9 8 6 4 9 16 Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. • Traff ix 7.8.0115 (c) 2006 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA • Year 2030 PM Thu Mar 1, 2007 09:26:22 Page 8=1 Wilson Avenue Extension Year 2030 Evening Peak Hour Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) ****#*#*************#*##**************#**#*##*****k*******##***#*t************** Intersection #6 Cherry Avenue (NS)/Wilson Avenue (EW) *#t***##****#*#***x****##**#**#*##****k*k**********#***#***********#************ Cycle (sec): 95- Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.542 Loss Time (sec): 8 (Y+R=4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 36.1 Optimal Cycle: OPTIMIZED Level Of Service: D ####*******#****##**************##*****###*##**************#************##**#*** Street Name: Cherry Avenue [9ilson Avenue Approach: North Bound South Bound East Hound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ___________________________~~_______________II_______________~_______________ Control :~ Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 10 26 28 10 28 28 10 26 28 ~ 10 28 28 Lanes: 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 D 1 1 0 ___________________________I______________________________~_______ Volume Module: Dase Vol: 217 123 52 318 312 293 114 379 233 125 390 162 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Ase: 217 123 52 318 312 293 114 379 233 125 390 162 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • PasserByVO1: 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 217 123 52 318 312 293 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 PHF Volume: 228 129 55 335 328 308 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 228 129 55 335 328 308 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 228 129 55 335 328 308 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 1800 1900 1900 1800 1900 1900 ___________________________I_______________ Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat:' 0.13 0.07 0.03 0.19 0.17 0.16 Crit Moves: **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.16 0.29 0.29 0.22 0.36 0.36 Volume/Cap: 0.82 0.23 0.10 0.84 0.48 0.45 Delay/Veh: 61.9 26.1 24.4 54.4 24.3 23.8 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 61.9 26.1 29.4 59.4 24.3 23.8 LOS by Move: E C C D C C HCM2kAvgQ: 9 3 1 12 7 6 Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per 0 114 1.00 0.95 lza 0 120 1.00 1.00 120 ____ 1900 0.95 1.00 1800 ~- 0.07 0.11 0.63 55.8 1.00 55.8 E 5 4**** lane 0 379 1.00 0.95 399 0 399 1.00 1.00 399 1900 1.00 1.24 2353 0.17 **** 0.29 0.56 30.3 1.00 30.3 C 8 F***** 0 0 0 0 233 125 390 162 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 295 132 911 171 0 0 0 0 245 132 411 171 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 245 132 411 171 1900 1900 1900 1900 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.76 1.00 1.41 0.59 1447 1600 2685 1115 _____II_______________I 0.17 0.07 0.15 0.15 #**# 0.29 0.11 0.29 0.29 0.58 0.69 0.52 0.52 30.3 60.0 29.3 29.3 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 30.3 60.0 29.3 29.3 C E C C 8 5 7 7 k******#**************# Traf£ix 7.8.0115 (c) 2006 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA • • A~~E~IDIX E Traffic Signal Warrant Worl~sheets • 2003 Edition WARRANT 3, PEAK HOUR (70% FACTOR) (Rural Areas) (COMMUNITY LESS THAN 10,000 POPULATION OR ABOVE 70 km/h OR ABOVE 40 mph ON MAJOR STREET) Traffic Conditions = Existing Major Street Name = Wilson Avenue Total of Both Approaches (VPH) = 473 Number of Approach Lanes Major Street = 1 Minor Street Name = Wardman Bullock Road High Volume Approach (V PH) = 296 Number of Approach Lanes Minor Street = 1 WARRANTED FORA SIGNAL • • soo s n_ s ~ 400 O tZ Q, N [- 300 3 O d r'~j, 200 T d d r!> 100 0 c iz 0 *100 *75 300 400 500 600 700 300 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 Mayor Street -Total of Both Appraaches -Vehicles Per Hour (VPH} -4-1 Lane (Major) & 1 Lane (Minor) --s'i--2+ Lanes (Major) & 1 Lane (Minor) OR 1 Lane (Major) & 2+ Lanes (PAinor) ~ . -o--2+ Lanes (Major) & 2+ Lanes (Minor) ---E-Major Street Approaches - dK - Minor Street Approaches * Note: 100 vph applies as the lower threshold volume fora minor-street approach with two or more lanes and 75 vph applies as the lower threshold volume fora minor-street approach with one lane. November 2003 Sect. 4C.06 J 2003 Edition WARRANT 3, PEAK HOUR (70% FACTOR) (Rural Areas) (COMMUNITY LESS THAN 10,000 POPULATION OR ABOVE 70 km/h OR ABOVE 40 mph ON MAJOR STREET) Traffic Conditions = Existing Major Street Name = Wilson Avenue Total of Both Approaches (VPH) = 106 Number of Approach Lanes Major Street = 1 Minor Street Name = Etiwanda Avenue-North Leg High Volume Approach {VPH) = 18 Number of Approach Lanes Minor Street = 1 SIGNAL WARRANT NOT SATISFIED • soo x a r ~ aoo 0 a a 4 E 300 7 O 3 i N p, 200 z iU d i ~ l00 O G *100 *75 0 -1- 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 Major Street -Total of Both Approaches -Vehicles Per Hour (VPH) -~---1 Lane (Major) & t Lane (Minor) -L~--2+ Lanes (Major) & t Lane (Minor) OR 1 Lane (Major) & 2+ Lanes (Minor) -0---2+ Lanes (Major) & 2+ Lanes (Minor) --~(-Major Street Approaches - dl: - Minor Street Approaches November 2003 Note: 100 vph applies as the lower threshold volume fora minor-street approach with two or more lanes and 75 vph applies as the lower threshold volume fora minor-street approach with one Lane. 1300 Sect. 4C.06 ,• 2003 Edition WARRANT 3, PEAK HOUR (70% FACTOR) (Rural Areas) (COMMUNITY LESS THAN 10,000 POPULATION OR A80VE 70 km/h OR ABOVE 40 mph ON MAJOR STREET) Traffic Conditions = Existing Major Street Name = Wilson Avenue .Total of Both Approaches (VPH) = 34 Number of Approach Lanes Major Streei = 1 Minor Street Name = Etiwanda Avenue-South Leg High Volume Approach (VPH) = 42 Number of Approach Lanes Minor Street = 1 SIGNAL WARRANT NOT SATISFIED • 500 .C Q .G ~ 400 O L a a d m E 300 7, O i 07 200 z ,.. m N 100 L 0 c '100 "75 o ~ 300 40o soo soo 70o aoo soo looo n oo izoo Major Street -Total of Both Approaches -Vehicles Per Hour (VPH) --~-1 Lane (Major) & 1 Lane (Minor) --6°2+ Lanes (Major) & 1 Lane (Minor) OR 1 Lane (Major) & 2+ Lanes (Minor) --~-2+ Lanes (Major) & 2+ Lanes (Minor) ~-Major Street Approaches - dK - Minor Street Approaches November 2003 * Note: 100 vph applies as the lower threshold volume fora minor-street approach with two or more lanes and 75 vph applies as the lower threshold volume fora minor-street approach with one lane. 1300 Bart. 4C.OR • 2003 Edition WARRAtdT 3, PEAK HOUR (70% FACTOR) (Rural Areas) (COMMUNITY LESS THAN 10,000 POPULATION OR ABOVE 70 km/h OR ABOVE 40 mph ON MAJOR STREET) Traffic Gontlitions =Year 2030 Major Street Name =Wilson Avenue Minor Street Name = Wardman Bullock Road Total of Both Approaches (VPH) = 731 Number of Approach Lanes Major Street = 1 High Volume Approach (VPH) = 198 Number of Approach Lanes Minor Street = 1 WARRANTED FOR A SIGNAL 500 • *100 *75 n o x- 300 aoo soo soo 70o eoo soo tooo 1100 t2oo Major Street -Total of Both Approaches -Vehicles Per Hour (VPH) -~--1 Lane (Major) & 1 Lane (Minor) --tt2+ Lanes (Major) & 1 Lane (Minor) OR 1 Lane (Major) & 2+ Lanes (Minor) -~-o--2+ Lanes (Major) & 2+ Lanes (Minor) -~--Major Street Approaches - dK - Minor Street Approaches • . * Note: 100 vph applies as the Tower threshold volume for aminor-street approach with two or more lanes and 75 vph applies as the lower threshold volume for aminor-street approach with one lane. November 2003 2 0. 7 ro 400 O Q a [- 300 7 O L Z~e N v ~ 100 ,_ ~~ c 1300 c~roV~i~r~l _ ni Flnr Sect. 4C.06 • 2003 Edition WARRANT 3, PEAK HOUR (70% I°ACTOR) (Rural Areas) (COMMUNITY LESS THAN 10,000 POPULATION OR ABOVE 70 km~h OR ABOVE 40 mph ON MAJOR STREET) Traffic Conditions =Year 2030 Major Street Name =Wilson Avenue Total of Both Approaches (VPH) = 322 Number of Approach Lanes Major Street = 1 Minor Street Name = Etiwanda Avenue-North Leg High Volume Approach (VPH) = 80 Number of Approach Lanes Minor Street = 1 SIGNAL WARRANT NOT SATISFIED • soo y a s m 400 D Q U. Q v E 300 .7 O 7 i m p7 200 2 m d (n 80 700 0 r_ *100 *75 N N 300 aoo sao soo 70o soo soo 7000 7100 7zoo Major Street -Total of Both'Approaches -Vehicles Per hlaur NPH} -~-1 Lane (Major) & t Lane (Minor) v2+ Lanes (Major) & 1 Lane (Minor) OR t Lane (Major) 3 2+ Lanes (Minor) --0-2+ Lanes (Major) & 2+ Lanes (Minor) --1F--Major Street Approaches - ~K - Minor Street Approaches • November 2003 SIGPKRural -NEW * Note: 100 vph applies as the lower threshold volume for aminor-street approach with two or more lanes and 75 vph applies as the lower threshold volume for aminor-street approach with one lane. 1300 Sect. 4C.06 2003 Edition • WARRANT 3, PEAK HOUR (70% FACTOR) (Rural Areas) (COMMUNITY LESS THAN 10,000 POPULATION OR ABOVE 70 km/h OR ABOVE 40 mph ON MAJOR STREET) Traffic Conditions = Year 2030 Major Street Name = Wilson Avenue SIGNAL WARRANT NOT SATISFIED • s Total of Both Approaches (V PH) = 268 Number of Approach Lanes Major Street = 1 Minor Street Name = Etiwanda Avenue-South Leg High Volume Approach (V PH) = 118 Number of Approach Lanes Minor Street = 1 soo a r ~ 400 O L Q Q Q N ~ 300 7 O i N q 200 S ai N (n 100 L 0 c ~_ *100 *75 o +- 300 aoo soo soo 700 soo soo looo n o0 1200 Major Street -Total of Both Approaches -Vehicles Per Hour (VPH) -~-1 Lane (Major) & 1 Lane (Minor) -~--2+ Lanes (Major) ~ 1 Lane (Minor) OR t Lane (Major) & ?_+ Lanes (A4inor) -~-2+ Lanes (Major) & 2+ Lanes (Minor) -~(--Major Street Approaches - '+K - Minor Street Approaches J * Note: 100 vph applies as the lower threshold volume fora minor-street approach with two or more lanes and 75 vph applies as the lower threshold volume fora minor-street approach with one lane. November 2003 SIGPKRural - NEW 1300 Sect. 4C.06 2003 Edition • WARRANT 3, PEAK HOUR (70% FACTOR) (Rural Areas) (COMMUNITY LESS THAN 10,000 POPULATION OR ABOVE 70 km/h OR ABOVE 40 mph ON MAJOR STREET) Traffic Conditions =Year 2030 Major Street Name = WilSOn Avenue Total of Both Approaches (VPH) = 250 Number of Approach Lanes Major Street = 1 Minor Street Name =East Avenue High Volume Approach (VPH) = 138 Number of Approach Lanes Minor Street = 1 SIGNAL WARRANT NOT SATISFIED _J x a s U O Y ~. Q N 1= 7 O 7 s u~ r m W to 0 G soo *100 *7s 400 300 200 too 0 1- 300 400 500 600 700 800 ~ 900 1000 1700 1200 Major Street -Total of Both Approaches -Vehicles Per Hour (VPH) -fl--1 Lane (Major) & 1 Lane (Minor) -fr-2+ Lanes (Major) & 1 Lane (Minor) OR 1 Lane (Major) & 2+ Lanes (Minor) --P-2+ Lanes (Major) & 2+ Lanes (Minor) ~E°Major Street Approaches - 3K - Minor Street Approaches '•J November 2003 SIGPKRural -NEW * Note: 100 vph applies as the lower threshold volume for aminor-street approach with two or more lanes and 75 vph.applies as the lower threshold volume for aminor-street approach with one lane. 7300 Sect. 4C.06 • Appendix E 1. Notice of Completion (NOC) 2. Notice of Preparation (NOP) 3. Letter responses to NOP 4. Initial Study 5. Comment Letter/Response to Comment 1. Notice of Completion (NOC) dppendix C • • Notice of Coln Mai! to: State Clearingho~ For Hand Delivery/SR~eer & Environmental Document Transmittal '.O. Box 3044, Sacramento, CA 95812-3044 (916) 445-0613 scH #2008071044 °ess: 1400 Tenih Street, Sacramento, CA 95814 1 L.J Project Title: Wilson Avenue Extension (East) -East Avenue to Wardman Bullock Road Lead Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga Contact Person: Walter Stickney hfailing Address:10500 Civic Center Drive Phone: (909) 477-2740, ext. 4076 City; Rancho Cucamonga ~ Zip: 91730 County: San Bernardino - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Project Location: County:San Bernardino - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CityMearest Commurity; Rancho Cucamonga Cross Streets: Wilson Ave/East Ave on the west, Wilson Ave/Wardman Bullock Road on the east Zip Code: 9173D Longitude/Latitude (degrees, minutes and seconds): _° _ ' _" N / _' _" W Total Acres: 12.66 acres Assessors Parcel No.: Section: 21, 26 Twp,: 1N Range: 6W Base: SBM Within 2 Miles: State Hwy N: 1.210 Waterways: Etiwanda Creek Airports: Railways: Schools: Document Type: CEQA: ^ NOP +^ Drab EIR NEPA: ^ NOI ~ Other. ^ Joint Document ^ Early Cons ^ SupplemenVSubsequent EIR ^ EA ^ Final Document ^ Neg Dec (Prior SCH No.) 2006071044 ^ Draft EIS ^ Other: ^ Mit Neg Dec Other: ^ FONSI Local Action Type: ^ General Platt Update ^ Specific Plan ^ Rezone ^ Annexation ^ General Ptan Amendment ^ Master Plan ^ Prezone ^ Redevelopment ^ General Plan Element i] Planned Unit Developme nt ^ Use Permit ^ Coastal Permit ^ Community Plan ^ Site Plan ^ Lend Division (Subdivision, etc.) ^~ Other:road constructig9 - - - - Development Type: - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ^ Residential: Units Acres ^ Office: Sq.ft. Acres Employees ~ Transportation: Type Local road improvements ^ Commercial:Sq.ft Acres ' Employees - ^ Mining: Mineral ^ Industrial: Sq.R Ades Employees ^ Power: Type MW ^ Educational: ^ Waste Treatment: Type MGD ^ Recreational: ^ Hazardous Waste:Type ^ Water Pacilities:Type MGD ^ Other: Project Issues Discussed i n Document: ^ Aesthetic/Visual ^ Fiscal ^ RecreatiorJParks i] Vegetation ^ Agricultural Land ~ Flood PleirJFlooding ^ Schools/Universities ^/ Water Quality ^/ Air Quality ^ Forest Land/Fire T-[azazd ^ Septic Systems ^ Water Supply/Groundwater ~ ArcheologicaUHistorieal ~ Geologic/Seismic ^ Sewer Capacity ^~ Wedand/Riparian i] Biological Resources ^ Minerals Q Soil ErosiodCompectionlGrading ^ Growth Inducement ^ Coastal lone i] Noise ^ Solid Waste ^ Land Use ~ Drainage/Absorption ^ Population/Housing Balan ce ^ Toxic/Hazardous ^ Cumulative Effects ^ Economic/Jobs i] Public Services/Facilities ^ Trafl'ielCireulation ^ Other: Present Land Use2oning/General Plan Designation: The project site is designated as an Modified Urban Arterial street in the City's Circulation Element ofihe General Plan Project Description: (please use a separate page if necessary) The proposed project involves the construction of approximately one lineal mile of road and drainage improvements to Wilson Avenue between East Avenue and Wardman Bullock Road, across a portion of Etiwanda creek. Additionally, approximately 300 feet of East Avenue, south of Wilson Avenue, will be Improved to connect to existing East Avenue Improvements and future Wilson Avenue improements. A'ote: The Sfafe Clearinghouse evil/assign identification mmibers for all new projects !fa SCH nwnber already exists for a projact (a.g. Notice afPreparation or prevloru draf( docvntentJ pleasefil(In, Revised 2008 • Reviewing Agencies Checklist Lead Agencies may recommend State Clearinghouse distribution by marking agencies below with and "Y". If you have already sent your document to the agency please denote that with an "S". • • X Air Resources Board Boating & Waterways, Department of California Highway Patrol X Caltrans District#8 _ Caltrans Division of Aeronautics _ Caltrans Planning _ Central Valley Flood Protection Board _ Coachella Valley Mtns. Conservancy _ Coastal Commission Colorado River Board X Conservation, Department of _ Corrections, Department of _ Delta Protection Commission _ Education, Department of _ Energy Commission X -Fish & Game Region N 6 _ Food & Agriculture, Department of Forestry and Fire Protection, Department of _ General Services, Depariment of Health Services, Department of Housing & Community Development _ integrated Waste Management Board )< Native American Heritage Commission Local Public Review Period (to be filled in by lead agency) Starting Date March 2, 2010 Lead Agency (Complete if applicable): _ Office of Emergency Services _ Office of Historic Preservation Office of Public School Construction X Parks & Recreation, Department of _ Pesticide Regulation, Department of _ Pubtic Utilities Commission X Regional WQCB # 8 X Resources Agency _ S.F. Bay Conservation & Development Comm. X San Gabriel & Lower L.A. Rivers & Mtns. Conservancy _ San Joaquin River Conservancy _ Santa Monica Mtns. Conservancy State Lands Commission _SWRCB: Clean Water Grants X SWRCB: Water Quality SWRCB; Water Rights _ Tahoe Regional Planning Agency X Toxic Substances Control, Department of X Water Resources, Department of X Other: California Highway Patrol _ Other: Ending Date April 16, 2010 Consulting Pirm: AEI-CASC Consulting Applicant: City of Rancho Cucamonga Address: 937 S. Via Lata, Suite 500 Address: 10500 Civic Center Drive City/State/Zip: Colton, CA 92324 City/State/Zip: Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Contact: Tom Nievez Phone: (909) 477-2740, ext 4076 Phone: (909) 783-0101, ext 3530 Signafure of Lead Agency Representative /! '-'-~ Date: 3 2. I Authodty cited: Section 21083, Public Resources Code. Reference: Section 21161, Public Resources Code. Revised 2008 2. Notice of Preparation (NOP) • hlotice of Preparation Form B Notice of Preparation To: State OPR, State Clearinghouse P.O. Box 3044 Sacramento, CA"°''~s' 95812-3044 Subject: Notice of Preparation of a Draft Environmental Impact Report City of Rancho Cucamonga willbetheLeadAgencyandwillprepareanenvironmental impact report for the project identiCed below. W e need to know the views of your agency as to the scope and content of the environmental information which is germane to your agency's statutory responsibilities in connection with the proposed project. Your agency will need to use the E[R prepared by our agency when considering your permit or other approval for the project. The project description, location, and the potential environmental effects are contained in. the attached materials. A copy of the Initial Study (~ is ^ is not) attached. • Due to the time limits mandated by State law, your response must be sent at the earliest possible date but not later than 30 days after receipt of this notice. Please send your response to Mr. Walter Stiekney, Engineering Division at the address shown above. We will need the name for a contact person in your agency. ProjectTltle: Wilson Avenue Extension -East Avenue to Wardman Bullock Road Project Applicant, if any: City of Rancho Cucamonga c • Date July 3, 2008 Signature From; City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucar~9~`t1t~a, CA 91730 Title Jory~illespie, City Traffic Engineer Telephone (909) 477-2740 Reference. California Code ofRerulations, Title 14, (CEQA Guidelines) Sections Ii082(n), 15103, Ii375. 2G n LJ NOTICE OF PREPARATION Date: July 7, 2008 RANCHO CUCAMONGA To: Aeencies Organizations and Interested Parties _ ' Subject: Notice of Preuaration of a Draft Environmental Impact Report Lead Agency: Agency Name: City of Rancho Cucamonga Street Address: 10500 Civic Center Drive City/State/Zip: Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 T/te Initial Study rs avnilable from the City upon request Consulting Firm: Firm Name: AEi-CASC Consultine Street Address: 937 S. Via Lata, Suite 500 City/State/Zip: Colton, CA 92324 The City of Rancho Cucamonga will be the Lead Agency and will prepare and environmental impact report for the project identified below. We need to know fire views of your agency as to the scope and content of the environmental informaflon which is germane to your agency's statutory responsibilities in connection with the proposed project. Your agency will need to use the EIR prepared by our agency when considering your permit or other approval for the project. • The project description, location and the potential environmental effects are contain>_d in the attached materials. A Copy of fhe Initial Study is attached for your review. Due to the time limits mandated by State law, your response must be sent at the earliest possible date but not later fhan 30 days after receipt of this notice. Please send your response to Walter Sflckney, Associate Civil Engineer, at the address shown above. We v`~lll need the name for a contact person in your agency. Project Title: Wilson Avenue Extension (East Avenue to Wardrnan Builoclc Road) Project Location: In the City of Rancho Cucamonga, approximately 40 miles east of Los Angeles, in the south western portion of San Bernazdino County. The portion of Wilson Avenue to be extended is located betweerr East Avenue and ZNardman Bullock Road, roughly one mile north of Highland Avenue. Project Description: ~ This project will extend Wllson Avenue for approximately one tulle from East Avenue to Wardrnan Bullock Road, crossing the Efiwanda Creek. This portion of Wilson Avenue is to be extended in order to allow better fire and emergency vehicle access to the northeastern portions of the City. Currently no permanent road improvements exist within the projectboundary, The roadway extension will be composed of~two travel lanes in each direction, a mediazt, bike lanes and a multipurpose trail As proposed the roadway will have a sixty eight-foot curb to curb distance and will have a length of approximately one mile. The Efiwanda Creek runs perpendicular to the proposed roadway extension; crossings will be consfructed to allow water within the Creek to continue to flow below the Roadway. Public Scoping Meeting: A Public Scoping Meeting for flits project has been scheduled for Asst 7, 2008 et 7:00 PM: The meeting will be held at a regularly scheduled Planning Commission meeting to be held at the City of Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center Cowu$ Chambers, located at 10500 Civic Center~Drive, Ran io uc~m P a, California. -7 ~ ! / Date ( ~ ~~ Signature: • Telephone: (909) 477-2740 Title: ,,3, n Gillespie, City Traf is Engineer Reference: California Code of Regulations, Title 14, (CEQA Guidelines) Sections 15082(a), 15103, 15375. - - ~ l~^: / ~- ~.-V :Cucamonga Peak OUad. ~ / I • I .. ~ , \ ~ (~~~ 1. ap0 J 1 > oo., -~ i ~ j ~ - `- ~- -_~~~ - ; \ -.-1. v1 ~' _ j 21 ., ;\ ; .Project. .._ -+~l ~- , \ area i`-~ i ., ,' \ ~ l / ~_ ~. ~ i~ i mH Aw~nuc I ~• - ~1 / 5cl+oul IL ~._ ~ ~-. "Jl=_3DIGIlr11T _•_IL__'1__j~ 27 ____. ____ ~ 28 1505 - i .. '. (-.. '_ ' it r ---_. of •~'~~ --- :__. ~ ~ r ._.f -J = •. __~~=__.w 3M. _J. ~~ .' la l: ~'_" ¢i • :; I~ 'L. ~ ~ .. j j SCALE 1:24,000 ,; I /' p 1/2 1 mile j~ 7000 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 feet 34.._. ~/ i it V' I/ . O ~ - L __ h F er~i ~ . _ ~- :- ,._~ .. - i ~, ,. a ,.; ./. ~ II _ . 'I aeiei ~~ Tans i5 F ;; I ,~ r _.. 'ice ,:'. _ i ~;-- !~ i..-__- : `_ j,:. /;~„ - i Figure 2. Project area. (Based on USGS Devore and Cucamonga Peak, Calif., 1:24,000 quadrangles [USGS 1988; 1996]) 2 3. Letter responses to NOP 1~ MWD • METROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT OF SOUTHERN C.ALIFDRNIA Executive Office August 7, 2008 Via E-mail and Regular Mail Mr. Walter Stickney Associate Civil Engineer City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Deaz Mr. Stickney Notice of Preparation of a Draft Environmental Impact Report for the Wilson Avenue Extension The Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Metropolitan) received a copy of the Notice of Preparation of a Draft Environmental Impact Report for the Wilson Avenue Extension • (Project). The city of Rancho Cucamonga is acting as the Lead Agency under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) for this project. The Project consists of extending Wilson Avenue for approximately one mile from East Avenue to Wazdman Bullock Road to allow better fire and emergency vehicle access to the northeastern portions of the city. The proposed project would be located in the city of Rancho Cucamonga, within San Bernardino County. This letter contains Metropolitan's response to the Public Notice as a potentially affected public agency. Our review of the Notice indicates that Metropolitan owns and operates a facility within the boundaries of the proposed project location. Metropolitan's Rialto Pipeline, which is a 96-inch inside-diameter precast concrete pipeline, runs in a wesUeast direction and is located within the proposed Project azea. In addition, the Rialto Pipeline is located within Fee Property and/or permanent easement, along the same aligmnent as the proposed extension. Metropolitan is concerned with potential impacts to the pipeline that may result from the construction and implementation of the proposed Project. We request that the City evaluate impacts of the proposed Project to Metropolitan's existing facilities that occur within the project's boundaries and propose mitigation measures where appropriate. These mitigation measures should also address how Metropolitan's ability to repair or replace the existing pipeline or install a future pipeline would be protected. The enclosed map shows these rights-of--way in relation to the proposed Project. Specific comments to the Initial Study on potential environmental issues for consideration and incorporation into the Draft EIR aze listed below: • • Page 1, Item 8 -Project Description. 700 N. Alameda Street, Los Angeles, California 90012 • Mailing Address: P.O. Box 54153, Los Angeles, California, 90054-0153 • Telephone: (213) 217-6000 Mr. Walter Stickney Page 2 August 7, 2008 The project description identifies a "multipurpose trail." It is assumed that this trail is intended to include equestrian usage, since equestrian trails exist along Wilson Ave in areas west of this project, as well as along other roadways throughout this azea. The Draft EIR should identify the specific uses of the "multipurpose trail" and the appropriate mitigation measures that would be taken for water quality protection. Should equestrian usage along Metropolitan's pipeline be proposed, the City must submit design and operational plans for the trail to be reviewed and approved by Metropolitan to ensure compliance with our requirements for compatible secondary uses (for example, equestrian trails) neaz our facilities. Property rights will also need to be acquired from Metropolitan to facilitate the multi-purpose trail crossing our Fee Property and this transaction should be coordinated through our Real Property Development and Management Group. The Draft EIR should also address how the trail would operate should Metropolitan need to work within our right-of--way thereby temporarily shutting down the trail system. • Page 2, Item ] 0. The Initial Study needs to identify Metropolitan as an agency whose approval is required. • • Page 12, Item 8 -Hydrology and Water Quality. Items c) and d) address alteration of the site's existing drainage patterns and indicate a "No Impact" in both boxes. The comments on Page 13 for the same items c) and d) then indicate them as "Less than significant impacts." This discrepancy needs to be corrected. A similar discrepancy exists for Items e) and f) in the table. Comments on Page 13 for items e) and f) indicate "No Impact." Items c, d, e, and f should be "Less than significant impact." • Page 13, Comments a) through j). The proposed Project would alter existing drainage patterns and could result in increased runoff and pollution from additional vehicle usage, trail use, etc. Hydrology Comments a) through j) state "this issue need not be addressed in the DEIR." These drainage pattern alterations are potentially significant and should be addressed in depth in the Draft EIR. • Page 17, Item 14 -Recreation. "No hnpact" is identified under the environmental effects of the multi-purpose trail. Depending on the use of this trail (i.e., equestrian use), water quality impacts aze possible in the absence of mitigation measures. The document should specifically identify the • trail uses and adjust the checked box to at least "Less than Significant," as appropriate. Mr. Walter Stickney Page 3 August 7, 2008 • • Page 19, Item I6 -Utilities and Service Systems Item c) indicates "No Impact" to the environment as a result of the Project's drainage facilities. As the project would need to construct new drainage facilities to address the new roadway paved azeas and possible multi-purpose trail drainage (which could include equestrian use); it would appeaz that this should be at least a "Less than significant impact," with a description in the Draft EIR of how this runoff will be addressed. • Metropolitan must be allowed to access and maintain its property and facilities at all times. Any uses, construction, and activities associated with the proposed Project must not restrict any of Metropolitan's day-to-day operations, property rights, and/or access to its facilities. Nor can the Project affect the water quality of Metropolitan supplies by allowing for non-compatible land uses. It is necessary that the Draft EIR identify measures that would ensure that the proposed Project will not encroach on Metropolitan's property and existing rights. Approval of the Project where it could impact Metropolitan's property should be contingent on Metropolitan's approval of design and operational plans for the Project. Detailed prints of drawings of Metropolitan's pipelines and rights-of--way may be obtained by calling Metropolitan's Substructures Information Line at (213) 217-6564. Please note that all submitted designs or plans must clearly identify Metropolitan's facilities and rights-of--way. We appreciate the opportunity to provide input to your planning process and we look forward to receiving future environmental documentation and the Draft EIR on this Project. If we can be of further assistance, please contact Ms. Brenda S. Marines at (213) 217-7902. Delaine W. Shane Manager, Environmental Planning Team Very truly yours, ~~-'~ BSM/bsm (Public Folders/EPU/Letters/30-NNE-OSA.doo-Waller SticAney, Wilson Avenue E#ensioq Rancho Cucamonga) Enclosures: Map Guidelines • C C C f S 5 a-+ ~ U ~_ L J 3 O ~ '~ ~ ~ X ~ W i ~ C ~ v ~Q c i Q 3 _ ~ L a--+ "B ~ ~ i f0 i l u 1. Introduction a. The following general guidelines should be followed for the design of proposed facilities and developments in the area of Metropolitan's facilities, fee properties, and/or easements. b. We require that 3 copies of your tentative and final record maps, .grading, paving, street improvement, landscape, storm drain, and utility plans be submitted for our review and written approval as they pertain to Metropolitan's facilities, fee properties and/or easements, prior to the commencement of any construction work. • 2. Plans Parcel and Tract Maps The following are Metropolitan's requirements for the identification of its facilities, fee properties, and/or easements on your plans, parcel maps and tract maps: a. Metropolitan's fee properties and/or easements and its pipelines and other facilities must be fully shown and identified as Metropolitan's on all applicable plans. b. Metropolitan's fee properties and/or easemenr}ts must be shown and identified as Metropolitan's with the official recording data on all applicable parcel and tract maps. c. Metropolitan's fee properties and/or easements and existing survey monuments must be dimensionally tied to the parcel or tract boundaries. d. Metropolitan's records of surveys must be referenced on the parcel and tract maps. U - 2 - 3. Maintenance of Access Aloncr Metro olitan's Iticrhts-of-Wav a. Proposed cut or fill slopes exceeding 10 percent are normally not allowed within Metropolitan's fee properties or easements. This is required to facilitate the use of construction and maintenance equipment, and provide access to its aboveground and belowground facilities. b. We require that 16-foot-wide commercial-type driveway approaches be constructed on both sides of e11 streets crossing Metropolitan's rights-of-way. Openings are required in any median island. Access ramps, if necessary, must be at least 15-feet-wide. Grades of ramps are normally not allowed to exceed 10 percent. If the slope of an access ramp must exceed 10 percent due to the topography, the ramp must be paved. We require a 40-foot-long level area on the driveway approach to access ramps where the ramp meets the street. At Metropolitan's fee properties, we may require fences and gates. c. The terms of Metropolitan`s permanent easement deeds normally preclude the building ar maintenance of • structures of any nature or kind within its easements, to ensure safety and avoid interference with operation and maintenance of Metropolitan's pipelines or other facilities. Metropolitan must have vehicular access along the easements at all times for inspection, patrolling, and for maintenance of the pipelines and other, facilities. on a routine basis. We require a 20-foot-wide clear zone around all above-ground facilities for this routine access. This clear zone should slope away from our facility on a grade not to exceed 2 percent. We must also have access along the easements with construction equipment. An example of this is shown on Figure 1. d. The footings of any proposed buildings adjacent to Metropolitan's fee properties and/or easements must sot encroach into the fee property or easement or impose additional loading on Metropolitan's pipelines or other facilities therein. Atypical situation is shown on Figure 2. Prints of the detail plans of the footings for any building or structure adjacent to the fee property or easement must be submitted for our review and written approval as they pertain to the pipeline or other facilities therein. Also, roof eaves of buildings adjacent to the easement or fee property must not overhang into the fee property or easement area. • - 3 - • e. Metropolitan's pipelines and other facilities, e.g. structures, manholes, equipment, survey monuments, etc. within its fee properties and/or easements must be protected from damage by the easement holdex on Metropolitan's property or the property owner where Metropolitan has an easement, at no expense to Metropolitan. Zf the facility is a cathodic protection station it shall be located prior to any grading or excavation. The exact location, description and way of protection shall be shown on the related plans . for the easement area. 4. Easements on Metropolitan's Property a. we encourage the use of Metropolitan's fee xights- of-way by governmental agencies for public street and utility purposes, provided that such use does not interfere with Metropolitan's use of the property, the entire width of the property is accepted into the agency's public street system and fair market value is paid for such use of the right-of-way. • b. Please contact the Director of Metropolitan's Fright of Way and Land Division, telephone (2131 250-6302. concerning easements for landscaping, street, storm drain, sewer, water or other public facilities proposed within Metropolitan's fee properties. A map and legal description of the requested easements must be submitted. Also, written evidence must be submitted that shows the city or county will accept the easement for the specific purposes into its public system. The grant of the easement will be subject to Metropolitan's rights to use its land for water pipelines and related purposes to the same extent as if such grant had not been made. There will be a charge for the easement. Please note that, if entry is required on the property prior to issuance of the easement, an entry permit must be obtained. There will also be a charge for the entry permit. 5. Landscapin4 Metropolitan's landscape guidelines for its fee properties and/or easements are as follows: a. A green belt may be allowed within Metropolitan's fee property or easement. • b. All landscape plans shall show the location and size of Metropolitan's foe pxoperty and/or easement and the location and size of Metropolitan's pipeline or other facilities therein. - 4 - • c. Absolutely no trees will be allowed within 15 feet of the centerline of Metropolitan's existing or Future pipelines and facilities. d. Deep-rooted trees are prohibited within Metropolitan's fee properties and/or easements. Shallow- rooted trees are the only trees allowed. The shallow-rooted trees will not be permitted any closer than 15 feet from the centerline of the pipeline, and such trees shall not be taller than 25 feet with a root spread no greater than 20 feet in diameter at maturity. Shrubs, bushes, vines, and ground cover are permitted, but larger shrubs and bushes should not be planted directly over our pipeline. Turf is acceptable. We require submittal of landscape plans for Metropolitan's prior review and written approval. (See Figure 3). e. The landscape plans must contain provisions for Metropolitan's vehicular access at all times along its rights-of-way to its pipelines or facilities therein. Gates capable of accepting Metropolitan's locks are required in any fences across its rights-of-way. Also, • any walks or drainage facilities across its access route must be constructed to AASHTO $-20 loading standards. f. Flights to landscape any of Metropolitan's fee properties must be acquired from its Right of Way and Land Division. Appropriate entry permits must be obtained priox to any entry on its property. There will be a charge for any entry permit or easements required. 6. Fencing Metropolitan requires that perimeter feacing of its fee properties and facilities be constructed~of universal chain link, 6 feet in height and topped with 3 strands of barbed wire angled upward and outwazd at a A5 degree angle or an agproved equal for a total fence height of 7 feet. Suitable substitute feacing may be considered by Metropolitan. (Please see Figure 5 for details?. 7. or Metropolitan`s policy for the alinement of utilities permitted within its fee properties and/or easements and • street sights-of-way is as follows: - 5 - a. Permanent structures, including catch basins, manholes, power poles, telephone riser boxes, etc., shall not be located within its fee properties and/or easements. b. We request that permanent utility structures within public streets, in which Metropolitan's facilities are constructed under the Metropolitan Water District Act, be placed as far from our pipeline as possible, but not closer than 5 feet from the outside of our pipeline. c. The installation of utilities over or under Metropolitan's pipeline(s) must be in accordance with the requirements shown on the enclosed prints of Drawings Nos. C-11632 and C-9547. Whenever possible we request a minimum of one foot clearance between Metropolitan's pipe and your facility. Temporary support of Metropolitan's pipe may also be required at undercrossings of its pipe in an open trench. The temporary support plans must be reviewed and approved by Metropolitan. d_ Lateral utility crossings of Metropolitan's pipelines must be as perpendicular to its pipeline • alinement as practical. Prior to any excavation our pipeline shall be located manually and any excavation within two feet of our pipeline must be done by hand. This shall be noted on the appropriate drawings. e. Utilities constructed longitudinally within Metropolitan's rights-of-way must be located outside the theoretical trench prism for uncovering its pipeline and must be located parallel to and as close to its rights- of-way lines as practical. f. When piping is jacked or installed i.n jacked casing or tunnel under Metropolitan`s pipe, there must be at least two feet of vertical clearance between the bottom of Metropolitan's pipe and the top of the jacked pipe, jacked casing or tunnel. We also require that detail drawings of .the shoring for the jacking or tunneling pits be submitted for our review and approval. Provisions must be made to grout any voids around the exterior of the jacked pipe, jacked casing or tunnel. If the piping is installed in a jacked casing or tunnel the annular space between the piping and the jacked casing or tunnel must be filled with grout. • - 6 - • g. Overhead electrical and telephone line requirements: 1} Conductor clearances are to conform to the California State Public Utilities Commission, General order 95, for Overhead Electrical Line Construction or at a greater clearance if required by Metropolitan. Under no circumstances shall clearance be less than 35 feet. 2) A marker must be attached to the power pole showing the ground clearance and line voltage, to help prevent damage to your facilities during maintenance or other work being done in the area. 3) Line clearance over Metropolitan's fee properties cadlor easements shall be shown on the drawing to indicate the lowest point of the line under the most adverse conditions including consideration of sag, wind load, temperature change, and support type. We require that overhead lines be located at least 30 feet laterally away from all • above-ground structures on the pipelines. 4) When underground electrical conduits, 120 volts or greater, are installed within Metropolitan's fee property and/or easement, the conduits must be incased in a minimum of three inches of red concrete. Where possible, above ground warning signs must also be placed at the right=of-way lines where the conduits enter and exit the right-of-way. h. The construction of sewerlines in Metropolitan's fee properties and/or easements must conform to the California Department of Health Services Criteria for the Separation of Water Mains and Sanitary Services and the local City or County Health Code Ordinance as it relates to installation of sewers in the vicinity of pressure waterlines. The construction of sewerlines.ahould also conform to these standards in street rights-of- way. 5.. Cross sections shall be provided for all pipeline crossings showing Metropolitan's fee property and/or easement limits and the location of our pipeline(s). The exact locations of the crossing pipelines and their elevations shall be marked on as-built drawings for our information. - 7 - identifying its pipeline. Two-working days notice is requested. j. Potholing of Metropolitan's pipeline is required i£ the vertical clearance between a utility and Metropolitan's pipeline is indicated on the plan to be one foot or less. If the indicated clearance is between one and two feet, potholing is suggested. Metropolitan will provide a representative to assists others in locating and k. Adequate shoring and bracing is required for the full depth of the trench when the excavation encroaches within the zone shown on Fiaure 4. 1. The location of utilities within Metropolitan's fee property andlor easement shall be plainly marked to , help prevent damage during maintenance or other work done in the area. Detectable tape over buried utilities should be placed a minimum of 12 inches above the utility and shall conform to the following requirements: I) Water pipeline: A two-inch blue warning tape shall be imprinted with: • "CAUTION BIIRIED WATER PIPELINE" 2) Gas, oil, or chemical pipeline: A two-inch yellow warning tape shall be imprinted with: •CAIITION BURIED PIPELINE' 3} Sewer or storm drain pipeline: A two-inch green warning tape shall be imprinted with: 'CAUTION BIIRIED PIPELINE" 4) Electric, street lighting, or traffic signals conduit: A two-inch red warning tape shall be imprinted with: "CAUTION BIIRZED CONDIIIT• 5) Telephone, or television conduit: A two-inch orange warning tape shall be imprinted with: "CAUTION BIIRIED CONDUiT• • ,• - 8 - m. Cathodic Protection requirements: 1) Zf there is a cathodic protection station for Metropolitan's pipeline in the area of the proposed work, it shall be located prior to any grading or excavation. The exact location, description and manner of protection shall be shown on all applicable plans. Please contact Metropolitan's Corrosion Engineering Section, located at Metropolitan's F. E. Weymouth Softening and Filtration Plant, 700 North Morena Avenue. La Verne, California 91750, telephone (714) 593-7474, for the locations of Metropolitan's cathodic protection stations. 2) If an induced-current cathodic protection system is to be installed on any pipeline crossing Metropolitan's pipeline, please contact Mr, Wayne E. Risher at (714) 593-7474 or (213) 250-5085: Be will review the proposed system and determine if any conflicts will arise with the existing cathodic protection systems installed by Metropolitan. • 3) Within Metropolitan`s rights-of-way, pipelines and carrier pipes (casings) shall be coated with an approved protective coating to conform to Metropolitan's requirements, and shall be maintained in a neat and orderly condition as directed by Metropolitan. The application and monitoring of cathodic protection on the pipeline and casing shall conform to Title 49 of the Code of Federal~Requlations, Part 195. 4) if a steel carrier pipe (casing) is used: (a) Cathodic protection shall be provided by use of a sacrificial magnesium anode (a. sketch showing the cathodic protection details can be provided for the designers information). {b) The steel carrier pipe shall be protected with a coal tar enamel coating inside and out in accordance with AWWA C203 specification. n. All trenches shall be excavated to comply with the CAL/OSHA Construction Safety Orders, Article 5, beginning with Sections 1539 through 1547. Trench backfill shall be placed in B-inch lifts and shall be compacted to 95 percent relative compaction (ASTM D598) across roadways and through • protective dikes. Trench backfill elsewhere will be compacted to 90 percent relative compaction (ASTM D698). - 9 - o. Control cables connected with the operation of Metropolitan's system are buried within streets, its fee properties and/or easements. The locations and elevations of these cables shall be shown on the drawings. The drawings shall note that prior to any excavation in the area, the control cables shall be located and measures shall be taken by the contractor to protect the cables in place. p. Metropolitan is a member of Underground Service Alert (USA). The contractor (excavatoz) shall contact uSA at 1-800-422-4133 (Southern California) at least 48 hours prior to starting any excavation work. The contractor will be liable for any damage to Metropolitan's facilities as a zesult of the construction. e. Paramount Right Facilities constructed within Metropolitan's fee properties and/or easements shall be subject to the paramount right of Metropolitan to use its fee properties • and/or easements for the purpose for which they were acquired. If at any time Metropolitan or its assigns should, in the exercise of their rights, find it necessary to remove any of the facilities from the fee properties and/or easements, such removal and replacement shall be at the expense of the owner of the facility. 9. Modification of Metropolitan's Facilities When a manhole or other of Metropolitan's facilities must be modified to accommodate your construction or recons- truction, Metropolitan will modify the facilities with its forces. This should be noted on the construction plans. The estimated cost to perform this modification will be given to you and we will require a deposit for this amount before the work is performed. Once the deposit is received, we will schedule the work. Onr forces will coordinate the work with your contractor. Our final billing will be based on actual cost incurred, and will include materials, construction, engineering plan review, inspection, and administrative overhead charges calculated in accordance with Metropolitan's standard accounting practices. If the cost is less than the deposit, a refund will be made; however, if the cost exceeds the deposit, an invoice will be forwarded for payment of the • additional amount. - 10 - U 20. Drainage a. Residential or commercial development typically increases and concentrates the peak storm water runoff as well as the total yeazly storm runoff from an area, thereby increasing the requirements for storm drain facilities downstream of the development. Also, throughout the year water from landscape irrigation, car washing, and other outdoor domestic water uses flows into the storm drainage system resulting in weed abatement, insect infestation, obstructed access and other problems. Therefore, it is Metropolitan's usual practice not to approve plans that show discharge of drainage from developments onto its fee properties and/or easements. b. If water must be carried across or discharged onto Metropolitan's fee graperties and/or easements, Metropolitan will insist that plans fox development provide that it be carried by closed conduit or lined open channel approved in writing by Metropolitan. Also the drainage facilities must be maintained by others, e.q., city, county, homeowners association, etc. If the development proposes changes to existing drainage • features, then the developer shall make provisions to provide for replacement and these changes must be approved by Metropolitan in writing. 11. Construction Coordination IIuring construction, Metropolitan's field representative will make periodic inspections. We request that a stipulation be added to the plans ar specifications for notification of Mr. of Metropolitan's Operatioas Services Brunch, telephone 13) 250- , at least two working days prior to any work in the vicinity of our facilities. 12. Pipeline Loading Restrictions a. Metropolitan's pipelines and conduits vary in structural strength, and some are not adequate for AASHTO H-20 loading. Therefore, specific loads over the specific sections of pipe or conduit must be reviewed and approved by Metropolitan. However, Metropolitan's pipelines are typically adequate for AASHTO 8-20 loading provided that the cover over the pipeline is not less than four feet or the cover is not substantially increased. If the temporary cover over the pipeline during construction is between three • and four feet, equipment must restricted to that which - 11 - • imposes loads no greater than AASHTO H-10. If the cover is between two and three feet, equipment must be restricted to that of a Caterpillar D-4 tract-type tractor. If the cover is less than two feet, only hand equipment may be used. Also, if the contractor plans to use any equipment over Metropolitan's pipeline which will impose loads greater than AASHTO H-20, it will be necessary to submit the specifications of such equipment for our review and approval at least one week prior to its use. More restrictive requirements may apply to the loading guideline over the San Diego Pipelines 1 and 2, portions of the Orange County Feeder, and the Colorado River Aqueduct. Please contact us for loading restrictions on all of Metropolitan's pipelines and conduits. b. The existing cover over the pipeline shall be maintained unless Metropolitan determines that proposed changes do not pose a hazard to the integrity of the pipeline or an impediment to its maintenance. 13. Blasting • a. At drilling for the vicinity preliminary Metropolitan least 20 days prior to the start of any rock excavation blasting, or any blasting, in of Metropolitan's facilities, a two-part :onceptual plan shall be submitted to as follows: ' b. Part 1 of the conceptual plan shall include a complete sumimary of ,proposed transportation, haadling, storage, and use of explosions. c. Part 2 shall include the proposed general concept for blasting, including controlled blasting techniques and controls of .noise, fly rock, airblast, and ground vibration. 14. CEQA Reouirements a. When Environmental Documents Have Not Been Prepared 1) Regulations implementing the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) require that Metropolitan have an opportunity to consult with the agency or consultants preparing any environmental documentation. We are required to review and consider • the environmental effects of the project as shown ir- the Negative Declaration or Environmental Impact Report (EZR) prepared for your project before committing Metropolitan to approve your request. • - 12 - 2) In order to ensure compliance with the regulations implementing CEQA where Metropolitan is not the Lead Agency, the following minimum procedures to ensure compliance with the Act have been established: a) Metropolitan shall be timely advised of any determination that a Categorical Exemption applies to the project. The Lead Agency is to advise Metropolitan that it and other agencies participating in the project have complied with the requirements of CEQA prior to Metropolitan's participation. b) Metropolitan is to be consulted during the preparation of the Negative Declaration or EIR. c) Metropolitan is to review and submit any necessary comments on the Negative Declaration or draft EIR. d) Metropolitan is to be indemnified for • any costs or liability arising out of any violation of any laws or zegulations including but not limited to the California Environmental Quality Act and its implementing regulations. b. When Environmental Documents Have Been Prepared • If environmental documents have been prepared for your project, please furnish us a copy for our review and files in a timely manner so that we may have sufficient time to review and comment. The following steps must also be accomplished:• 1) The Lead Agency is to advise Metropolitan that it and other agencies participating in the project have complied with the requirements of CEQA prior to Metropolitan's participation. 2) You must agzee to indemnify Metropolitan, its officers, engineers, and agents for any costs or liability. arising out of any violation of any laws or regulations including but not limited to the California Environmental Quality Act and its implementing regulations. •15. Metropolitan's Plan-Review Cost a. An engineering review of your proposed facilities and developments and the preparation of a letter response - i~ - giving Metropolitan's comments, requirements and/or approval that will require 8 man-hours or less of effort is typically performed at no cost to the developer, unless a facility must be modified where Metropolitan has superior rights. If an engineering review and letter response requires more than S man-hours of effort by Metropolitan to determine if the proposed facility or development is compatible with its facilities, or if modifications to Metropolitan's manhole(s) or other facilities will be required, then all of Metropolitan's costs associated with the project must be paid by the developer, unless the developer has superior rights. b. A deposit of funds will be required from the developer before Metropolitan can begin its detailed engineering plan review that will exceed 8 hours. The amount of the required deposit will be determined after a cursory review of the plans for the proposed development. c. Metropolitan's final billing will be based on actual cost incurred, and will include engineering plan review, inspection, materials, construction, and administrative overhead charges calculated in accordance • with Metropolitan's standard accounting practices. If the cost is Less than the deposit, a refund will be made; however, if the cost exceeds the deposit, an invoice. will be forwarded for payment of the additional amount. Additional deposits may be required if the cost of Metropolitan's review exceeds the amount of the initial deposit. 16, Caution We advise you that Metropolitan's plan reviews and responses are based upon information available to Metropolitan which was prepared by oz on behalf of Metropolitan for general record purposes only. Such information may not be sufficiently detailed or accurate for your purposes. No warranty of any kind, either express or implied, is attached to the information therein conveyed as to its accuracy, and no inference should be drawn from Metropolitan's failure to comment on any aspect of your project. You are therefore cautioned to make such surveys and other field investigations as you may deem prudent to assure yourself that any plans for your project are correct. • • - 14 - 17. Additional Information , Should you require additional information, please contact: Civil Enaineerina Substructures Section Metropolitan Water District of Southern California P.O. Sox 54153 Los Angeles, California 90054-0153 (213} 217-6000 JEH/MRW/lk Rev. January 22; 1989 Encl. u • •. Z . o h ~ ~ U Y fS~ ~ i ? ~ 7 3Y ~ q ~ O h ~ ~~ u n 0. ~ f ~d a 3 ~ ? b g~ W ?j W a ~: a z z ii: ~C OY ~ iii u `~ ~' ~d~ o d a ~ ~ ~Y z ~_ ~ 'a F N tl !a z~ J . ~.` ~ ° ~ O ~ :: 'i, o 0 ~ ~ pO _1 N ~ O 24~~~~ ~ N X ~ m Qo a ~ ~ ~ ~~ o ~+~ m i M e /" `i .~ ~~ ..i y_ p ' ,' _ _i ~ ,~ ••' i m ~. :T ~~ ' . ~i • ~~ . ~ .~ _, = W ' W r Z O ra- s "- a {- ... W S ~ O ~ ~ m ti 3~ Y W ~ ~ W x u m z ~k~ C A Y a ..... .~m.~u......• ua......n was e i a NO PERMANENT STRUCTURES PERM/TTED M.W.D. PERMANENT RIGHT OF WAY . /.~ NO ROOF OVERHANG PERM/TTED -~+--C BUILD/NG FOOTING MUST NOT AD/AC£NT ENCROACH INTO TO RIGHT RIGHT OF WAY OF WAY FINISHED SURFACE I~~ I j~~:i •i I 1 [~ I ~ I l REQUIRED I ~' ~ { DEPTH Of [ 1 FOOTING 1 •1 45' 1 a _,.~~IpE _ TYP/CAL i t I 1 41 t g M.W.D. PIPELINE r~ Mcrx~ ~ waraR curRrrr REQUIREMENTS FOR NOTE: M.W.D. PIPELINE S/IE,DEPTH,LOCAT/ON BUILDINGS AND FOOT/NGS AND W/OTN DF PERMANENT R/GhT OF AO/ACENT TO df, W. D. WAY VARIES. RJGHT OF WAY FIUU.iE 2 .i ~.m«c....~w kywwr,a~ • K W ~ Z ~ 1 W I 7 "s ~ ~ `' ~ ~ o ~~ ~~~ • a Q ~ ~ ~` Q O Z ~ t:: i 'w ~ •'•`e 'J ~t W ~- 2~ n0 ~ tih Z ~ O ~ ~ H 0 4~ ~ u J ~ h ~~~ ~ O ~' ? ~ j O ~ '¢' 2 R aZ C, C 2~ ~ C ~ ~ ~ .. y W w W~ ~ to O 2 ~" Q 4 I~ i~ I~ ~i: I ~: I~ e g a 0 a •~.y r/ttwKwd~wlGWw~w~tp) • • I { I ~O 'L W ~ ~ ~;t~~~t ~ 1 ~ t~~~~~ ~.~~~ ~~ ~~ ~.E ~ ~~~~ P~ ~~ ~_gy~ _~ t:5~ a ~, ~ ~ ~s ~il~~i Zi'3a ri~~~Li Z ~{ • h ~3 ~~ 1! ~_ ~ f I V ' x~ i~ =4 uW ~~ t~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ W ~~~ ~ .r ~ 4 2 Q ~ yo E ~ ~ ~ T ~ ,~ '_ •9 ~ Z ~~I~~ ~` F ~~~~ ~ ~ ~~[•~ ~ ~ ~~F2 sg~~ ~ j ~~ _ ~~ 4 ~ t ~ 5 ~ t l~ ~ ~t~i:P ~at3 ~. ~ ~~t~ Ze 3es ~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ at S ~' ~ ~ ~: ;~ r ^I ! i i ~! J caoss sECrionr " 8-1 ~ / Supporting wo// sho!/ have o firm bearing ao the i subgrode and against the side of the axcaration. '• 2. Premolded rxponsion Joint fi/tar per ASTM D-/75/ 73 fo be used in support for steal pipe on/y. 3. if trench width is 4 feet or greoter,measured o/ong centeNine of M•W.O. pipe, concrete support must be canstructad. ~ 4. /f trench width is Iess thou 4 feat, c%on sand bact- ~ fi//, canpocted ra 90:~ density in accordance wiM the provisions of AST61 Slondoid O-/557-70 may be- used in /ieu of the concrete Support wnJ/. ~ -, ~!, ~. t R~1H!D. Pfpdine l! Q i ~ ~ 4"x6 promo/ded ~ ! r I -+-------+- 1 expansion Joint •.a,. .. ~-~, • Dmm _~ !- _ • • - ' ~ Apertures os directed by • , _. ' ~ - ^ •-• -- -~ --• -- ti . • • ~ • e • the Engineer,totoi volume • ~' •' °• not ro exceed ~ the vo/ume .• ~ .• of the supporting wo// - ^_,-' -- . ~; t• •• ' ~ Connate support wo/! fo 4 • be piocad against undis- d ._. •_ Curbed ground __--_--_ SEGTlO/V "Q-A" ~...v. ~~.., .K,:.~....~~.~..,.«, i `~ • ~3"Preformed expansion ~ NOTES /. This method fo be•used where the /L M.W.D. pips utility /ine is 24'orgreolei in diameter and the clearance between the uti/ify /ine and M.W.D. pipe is /2'or /ess. 2. Specio/ pra/ectian may be required SECT/ON A tf the ati/fly l/na dlamater Is greater than M.W. D. pipe or it the corer over the uf!/Ify /ine fo tha street surface is min/mo/ and there is /2"or /ess clearance betwesn M.W.D. pipe end the ufi/Ity /ine. 3. Preformed expansion joint ti//er !o comp/y with RSTM designation D-l75/-73. 4. M. W. D, requests /2"minimum c/eoronce whenerer possible. limits So, expansion r CROSS SECT/ON ®'~~~ South Coast .. Air Quality Management District 21865 Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, CA 91765-4178 s~J` ~-(909) 396-2000 • www.agmd.gov ~.'I~ ~'~ r ~-..- July l8, 2008 .~dorr'Gi lespie I~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ D City Traffic Engineer ~ILIUnIJ}l City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive JUL 21 2008 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 CJTY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Dear Mr. Gillespie: ENGINEERING OIVI510l~1 Notice of Preparation of a Draft Environmental Impact Report (Draft EIR) for the Wilson Avenue Extension Project The South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) appreciates the opportunity to comment on the above- mentioned document. The SCAQMD's comments aze recommendations regarding the analysis of potential air quality impacts from the proposed project that should be included in the draft environmental impact report (EIR). Please send the SCAQMD a copy of the Draft EIR upon its completion. In addition, please send with the draft EII2 all appendices or technical documents related to the air quality analysis and electronic versions of all air quality modeling and health risk assessment files. Without all files and supporting air quality documentation, the SCAQMD will be unable to complete its review of the air quality analysis in a timely manner. Any delays in • providing all supporting air quality documentation will require additional time for review beyond the end of [he comment period. Air OualitV Analysis The SCAQMD adopted its California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Air Quality Handbook in 1993 to assist outer public agencies with the preparation of air quality analyses. The SCAQMD recommends that the Lead Agency use [his Handbook as guidance when preparing its air quality analysis. Copies of the Handbook are available from the SCAQMD's Subscription Services Department by calling (909) 396-3720. Alternatively, the lead agency may wish to consider using the California Air Resources Board (GARB) approved URBEMIS 2007 Model. This model is available on the SCAQMD Wcbsite at: www.urbemis.com. The Lead Agency should identify any potential adverse air quality impacts that could occur from all phases of the project and all air pollutant sources related to the project. Air quality impacts from both construction (including demolition, if any) and operations should be calculated. Construction-related air quality impacts typically include, but are not limited to, emissions from the use of heavy-duty equipment from grading, earth-loading/unloading, paving, architectural coatings, off-road mobile sources (e.g., heavy-duty construction equipment) and on-road mobile sources (e.g., construction worker vehicle trips, material transport trips). Operation-related air quality impacts may include, but are not limited to, emissions from stationary sources (e.g., boilers), area sources (e.g., solvents and coatings), and vehicular trips (e.g., on- and off-road tailpipe emissions and entrained dust). Air quality impacts from indirect sources, that is, sowces [hat generate or attract vehicular trips should be included in the analysis. The SCAQMD has developed a methodology for calculating PM2.5 emissions from construction and operational activities and processes. In connection with developing PM2.5 calculation methodologies, the SCAQMD has also developed both regional and localized significance thresholds. The SCAQMD requests that the lead agency quantify PM2.5 emissions and compare the results to the recommended PM2.5 significance thresholds. Guidance for calculating PM2.5 emissions and PM2.5 significance thresholds can be found at the following Internet address: •, http://www.agmd. og v/cega/handboolJPM2 5/PM2 S.html. Mr. Jon Gillespie -2- June 18, 2008 • In addition to analyzing regional air quality impacts the SCAQMD recommends calculating localized air quality impacts and comparing the results to localized significance thresholds (LSTs). LST's can be used in addition to the recommended regional significance thresholds as a second indication of air quality impacts when preparing a CEQA document. 'T'herefore, when preparing the air quality analysis for the proposed project, it is recommended that the lead agency perform a localized significance analysis by either using the LSTs developed by the SCAQMD or performing dispersion modeling as necessary. Guidance for performing a localized air quality analysis can be found at ham://www.aum d. eov/cegalhandbook/LST/LST, htm I. It is recommended that lead agencies for projects generating or am•acting vehicular trips, especially heavy-duty.diesel- fueled vehicles, perform a mobile source health risk assessment. Guidance for performing a mobile source health risk assessment ("Health Risk Assessment Guidance for Analyzing Cancer Risk from Mobile Source Diesel Idling Emissions for CEQA Air Quality Analysis") can be found on the SCAQMD's CEQA web pages at the following Internet address: htto'//www agmd gov/cega/handboohhnobile toxic/mobile toxiahtml. An analysis of all toxic air contaminant impacts due to the decommissioning or use of equipment potentially generating such air polhitants should also be included. Mitigation Measures In the event that the project generates significant adverse air quality impacts, CEQA requires that all feasible mitigation measures [hat go beyond what is required by law be utilized during project construction and operation to minimize or eliminate significant adverse air quality impacts. To assist the Lead Agency with identifying possible mitigation measures forthe project, please refer to Chapter ] 1 of the SCAQMD CEQA Air Quality Handbook for sample air quality mitigation measures. Additional mitigation measures can be found on the SCAQMD's CEQA web pages at the following Internet address: www.agmd.eov/cega/handbook/mitigation/MM intro.html Additionally, SCAQMD's Rule 403 -fugitive Dust, and the Implementation Handbook contain numerous measures for controlling construction-related emissions that should be considered for use as CEQA mitigation if not otherwise required. Other measures to reduce air quality impacts from land use projects can be found in the SCAQMD's Guidance Document for • Addressing Air Quality Issues in General Plans and Local Planning. This document can be fowtd at the following Internet address: htto'//www agmd. Gov/prdas/aq ~uik de/ageuide.html. In addition, guidance on sitting incompatible land uses can be found in the California Air Resources Board's Air Quality and Land Usc Handbook: A Community Perspective, which can Ue found at the following Internet address: htta://www.arb.ca.gov/ch/handbook.~df. Pursuant to state CEQA Guidelines § 15126.4 (a)(1)(D), any impacts resulting from mitigation measures must also be discussed. Data Sources SCAQMD rules and relevant air quality reports and data are available by calling the SCAQMD's Public Information Center at (909) 396-2039. Much of the infonna[ion available through the Public Information Center is also available via the SCAQMD's World Wide Web Homepage htt ://www.agmd.gov). 'T'he SCAQMD is willing to work with the Lead Agency to ensure that project-related emissions are accurately identified, categorized, and evaluated. Please call Gordon Mize, Ph.D., Air Quality Specialist, CEQA Section, at (909) 396-3302 if you have any questions regarding this letter. Sincerely, `5-~.;.~ :5,~~~ti~~ Steve Smith, Ph.D. Program Supervisor, CEQA Section Planning, Rule Development and Area Sources SS:GM:AK 5 BC080711-03 AK Control Number DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS COUNTY OF SANBERNARDINO FLOOD CONTROL • SOLID WASTE MGMT • SURVEYOR • TRANSPORTATION PUBLIC AND SUPPORT u_,~p.;n. v?v SERVICES GROUP 625 East Third Street • San Bernardino, CA 92475-0835 • (909) 387-8104 VANA R. OLSON Fax (909) 387-8130 Director of Public Works Jt,ly 22, zoos (~} ~ ~ C~ fl M a File #10(ENV)-4.01 Mr. Walter Stickney, Associate Civil Engineer `)()~' r `; 208 Public Works Department CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMQNGA City of Rancho Cucamonga ENGINEERING DIVISION 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 RE: NOTICE OF PREPARATION OF DRAFT EIR FOR WILSON AVENUE EXTENSION (EAST AVENUE TO WARDEN BULLOCK ROAD) PROJECT Dear Mr. Stickney: Thank you for giving the San Bernardino County Department of Public Works the opportunity to comment on the above-referenced project. After reviewing the submitted document, our Department would like to receive a copy of the environmental document and any technical reports/studies that will be prepared for this project, • when they become available. At that time, our Department will review the project and provide comments. Sincerely, NARESH-P. VARMA, P.E., Chief Environmental Management Division N PV: FM:nh/CEQA Rec'd_Rancho Cucamonga_Wilson Ave Extension 2_EIR Regst'd cc: Frank Molina VRO/MK Reading File • MARK H. UFFER County AdminisVative OfFCer NORMAN A. KANOLD Asslslant County AdminisUalor Public and Support Services Group Board of Supervisors BRAD MITZELFELT .....................First P'sirict DENNIS HANSBERGER......................IDird District PAUL BIANE ...................._,Gecond aslrlct GARY C. OVITr................, ........... FourU DisUict JOBIE GDNZALES .................... ..... Fifth DisVicl STATE OF OALIP~r NIA Arnold S hw 2ep~gaer. Gove_mor • NATIVE AMERICAN HERITAGE COMMISSION 91 S CAPITOL MALL, ROOM 364 SACRAMENTO, CA 95814 (916)653-4082 (916) 657-5390 -Fax Walter Stickney City of Rancho Cucamonga P.O. Box 807 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 July 16, 2008 ~o"'s.-rar a ~P: 'n' ~ ~ ( I ' ~ I ~ v IS I(~I ~IUI~ I LJ nu ' JUL 2 7. 2008 CITY OF RANCHO. CUCAMUNGA ENGINEERING DIVISION RE: SCHq 2008071044 Wilson Avenue Extension-East Avenue to Wardman Bullock Road; San Bernardino County. Dear Mr. Stickney: The Native American Heritage Commission has reviewed the Notice of Preparation (NCP) regarding the above referenced project. The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) states that any project that causes a substantial adverse change in the significance of an historical resource, which includes archeological resources, is a significant effect requiring fhe preparation of an EIR (CEQA guidelines 15064(b)). To adequately comply with this provision and mitigate project-related impacts on archaeological resources, the Commission recommends the following actions be required: / Contact the appropriate Information Center for a record search to determine: • If a part or all of the area of project effect (APE) has been previously surveyed for cultural resources. • If any known cultural resources have already been recorded on or adjacent to the APE. • If the probability is low, moderate, or high that cultural resources are located in the APE. • If a survey is required to determine whether previously unrecorded cultural resources are present. / If an archaeological Invehtory survey is required, the final stage is the preparation of a professional report.detailing the findings and recommendations of the records search and field survey. • The final report containing sde forms, site significance, and mitigation measurers should be submitted immediately to the planning department. All information regarding site locations, Native American human remains, and associated funerary objects should be in a separate confidential addendum, and not be made available for pubic disclosure. • The final written report should be submitted within 3 months after work has been completed to the appropriate regional archaeological Information Center. , / Contact the Native American Heritage Commission for: • A Sacred Lands File Check. Sacred Lands Flle check completed. no sites Indicated • A list of appropriate Native American Contacts for consultation concerning the project site and to assist in the mitigation measures. Native American Contacts Llst attached / Lack of surface evidence of archeological resources does not preclude their subsudace existence. • Lead agencies should include in their mitigation plan provisions for the identification and evaluation of accidentally discovered archeological resources, per California Environmental Cduality Act (CEQA) §75064.5(f). In areas of identified archaeological sensitivity, a certified archaeologist and a culturally affiliated Native American, wRh knowledge in cultural resources, should monitor all ground-disturbing activities. • Lead agencies should Include in their mitigation plan provisions for the disposition of recovered artifacts, in consultation with culturally affiliated Native Americans. • Lead agencies should include provisions for discovery of Native American human remains in their mitigation plan. Health and Safety Code §7050.5, CEQA §15064.5(e), and Public Resources Code §5097.96 mandates the process to be followed in the event of an accidental discovery of any human remains in a location other than a dedicated cemetery. ~ .. ~~ Sinderely, -_ . ~~ y ~GfhlGl~-l Katy S nchez • Program Analyst (916)653-4040 CC: State Clearinghouse ., • San Manuel Band of Mission .mes Ramos, Chairperson 26569 Community Center Drive Highland ~ CA 92346 (909) 864-8933 (909) 864-3724 -FAX (909) 864-3370 Fax Native American Contacts San Bernardino County July 16, 2008 Indians Morongo Band of Mission Indians Robert Martin, Chairperson Serrano 11581 Potrero Road Cahuitla Banning CA 92220 Serrano Robert_Martin @ morongo.org San Fernando Band of Mission Indians John Valenzuela, Chairperson P.O. Box 221838 Fernandelio Newhall CA 91322 Tataviam tsen2u@msn.com Serrano (661) 753-9833 Office Vanyume (760) 885-0955 Cell Kitanemuk (760) 949-1604 Fax Morongo Band of Mission Indians Michael Contreras, Cultural Heritage Prog. Manager 13000 Field Road Cahuilla Cabazon CA 92230 Serrano 51) 755-5025 51)201-1866 -cell td51) 922-0105 Fax San Manuel Band of Mission Indians Ann Brierty, Environmantal Department 1dT Pure Water Lane Serrano Highland CA 92346 abrierty@sanmanuel-nsn.gov (909) 863-5899 EXT-4321 (909) 862-5152 Fax This list Is current only as of the date of this document. (951) 849-8807 (951) 755-5200 (951) 922-8146 Fax Serrano Nation of Indians Goldie Walker 6588 Valaria Drive Serrano Highland CA 92346 (909) 862-9883 DlstribuUon of th(s list does not relieve any person of statutory responsibility as defined In Section 7050.5 of the Health end Safety Code, Section 5097.94 of the Public Resources Code and Section 5097.98 of the Public Resources Code. This list Is only applicable for contacting local Native Americans with regard to cultural resources for the proposed ~H4 2008071044 Wilson Avenue EMension-East avenue to Wardman Bullock Roatl; San Bernardino County. City of Rancho Cucamonga '• Wilson Avenue Extension (West) August 6, 2008 Project Team Attendance: / Mark Steuer, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer, City of Rancho Cucamonga / Romeo David, Associate Engineer, Engineering Services Department, City of Rancho Cucamonga / Tom Dodson, Environmental Consultant, Tom Dodson & Associates / Jo McAndrews, TDA Technical Consultant, McAndrews & Boyd Community Attendance: / Jo-Ann McMillan 0 5895 Cedar Mtn. Dr. o Alta Loma 0 91737 o billjol@earthlink.net 0 909-944-8147 / Robert Hansen • 0 5655 High Meadow o Alta Loma o Altaeml@earthlink.net 0 909-922-6611 / Allison Jarlett-Burkhart 0 5437 Carriage PI o sburkhart8584@charter.net / Teri Schlegel 0 11054 Stone o River Dr o tlschlegel ancharter.net 0 909-996-8140 / Linda Anderson 0 11024 Stone River Dr. o Ikarealtor(a~hotmail.com 0 909-987-6659 • 1 • / Frank & Aral Bucalo 0 10903 Beech wood Dr o Alta Loma 0 91737 0 909-484-0012 / Bob Josmck 0 10902 Wilson Ave o Alta Loma 0 91737 0 909-989-1602 / Victor Quiet 0 11008 Wilson o Alta Loma 0 91237 0 909-541-1757 Community Input • This meeting was in two sections East and West Wilson. The AEI representative who presented the first half of the program focused on the Eastern portion of the proposed project. He did not ask the community representatives to give their names. The following is a list of comments from the community representatives on the Western portion of the proposed project. There were no comments on the Eastern portion. 1. Why four lanes 2. Does the city decide what the speed limit is going to be 3. In the second phase are you going to address the problem of the schools at certain times by Chaffee College it is impossible to get out of my drive way 4. The reason I asked about four lanes that means that the western portion will have four lanes. 5. The only other four lanes is Baseline, this is a residential area a community that just means that it is going to become a raceway.. 6. Can you take us back to the map and show us the current path for emergency vehicles 7. Are their any plans to build more fire stations in the area 8. Thee are no plans to build a station on the western part of Wilson? 9. What are the city boundaries for fire coverage? 10. Did the money for the fire station come from the development • 11. What is your response time now? 2 • 12.You took away the old road that you used in the past didn't you. 13. Wilson between Ortman going east is that four lanes or is that two lanes, Wilson to Day Street is that four lanes? 14. Wilson to Etiwanda is that four lanes? 15. Wilson beyond the red line west is not developed yet? 16.Your going from four lanes to two down by Chaffee college there is not much room 17.There isn't room their. 18.Our biggest concern is the speed I have witnessed many accidents and if you make it into a four lane and do not control the speed it will be even worse. 19.The police don't parole that area 20. We don't need the four lanes and the speed 21.I live by Chaffee and I have witnessed lots of accidents I am talking about more the 60miles per hour. I have witnessed the kids just pulling out of no where some lady came down a hit a car and flipped you can't get out of your driveway. 22.How far is that red line up by Etiwanda one mile, so you are basically saying that that is all of the development that is going to be developed? 23.You are telling me there are not plans to put a fire station North of Wilson? • 24. It would seem to me that it would be more cost effective to put a fire station up their because you have two neighbor hoods that 25.Is this all about building a four lane road because they are panning to build 26.I live on Wilson right across from Chaffee it takes me30 to 40 minutes to get out of my drive way 27.Their has got to be changes we don't have a stop sigh or lights 28.I understood that the core of engineers owned this land and it was a flood plain -how do you address that 29. With all the water conservation is that going to affect the medians? 30. (Bob & Jane Joswick) I am concerned about the noise levels, here is so much traffic noise now we had to put freeway glass all away around our house 31. (Teri) If you are going to build a four lane highway how is that going to integrate with the east west roughs 32.I have looked at the general plan and it does not show that road going through it shoes it as a flood plain 33.Are you going to amend the general plan, what is the plan (what does the city have in mind) 34.There is no reason for a road to be built their now, why build the road 35.There is not development right now I see no purpose for that road to be • built 36. Why are you doing this now (the presentation) what is the purpose? 3 • 37. It sounds like the general plan is just going to grind through no matter what 38. How about the four lanes of traffic going into Milliken I know this is a temporary situation but when is that going to resolve. 39. Will your EIR take into consideration the flow of traffic with the schools and college? 40.What is going to be the cost of this project? 41. What is budgeted for that one mile 42. Where is the funding coming from? 43. What is the budget for the entire plan? 44. If this is in the general plan why were homes and colleges allowed to be built where there is no room for four lanes of traffic 45. Has easement thought the rock quarry all ready been granted? 46. Why is the county motivated to do this now? 47. (Bob 7oswck) I missed the scope of work was their any thing included about endangered species -isn't there some kind of grasshopper that is endangered. 48.If there is a four-lane road going form Milliken to Haven is there plans to put stoplights? 49.A11 of the new developments have designed the homes to face away form the large streets how are you Bong to design this when all of the • driveways dump on to Wilson? 50.At what point will you address what will happen further west during your evaluation? 51. When you get to Milliken and Wilson there is not the room you will be hitting into an area of homes what are you going to do? 52. We understand that our issues will be in this document 53. Is there a formal response period that the public and respond? . 54.Is this going to happen soon? 55. Is there a shelf life to this document? 56. How long is the information you provide valid 57.There is not a need for this now why are we spending the money? Written Comments: Bob and lane ]oswick: Great concern about heavy traffic on Wilson Ave- CAN NOT get out of our drive way to get to work. Jo-Ann McMillan: 1. With the economy in a downturn, where is the City getting the funds to build the 4-lane road? 2. With the extension of Milliken we have experienced an increase in noise • via ordinary traffic as well as cars racing on the weekend evenings. There 4 never seems to be a police patrolling this area. We've heard and seen • two bad accidents around the curve in the road (speed is posted 15 mph, but most don't adhere to that). We backup to Milliken and see and hear a lot of what happened on Milliken. Will the police be more visible with a 4- lane road built and the risk of more fast drivers causing accidents? 3. Why a 4-lane road any way? Banyon is only 2 lanes. This has been a primarily quiet, upscale community and Wilson is in a remote part of Cucamonga that is unless the City has bigger plans. 4. What happened to this area being on a flood plain? We had once written to Feinstein and Boxer and they were appalled when a developer who built the Colonies was interested in the land above Wilson. The Daily Bulletin followed this case closely, but there hasn't been any information forthcoming for some time now. I'm sure that these are some of the same concerns others have as well. Please let me know if there is something I can do. Thank you for taking up the cause Jo-Ann McMillan Robert Hansen: • Please consider traffic & noise impacts the proposed development will cause further west of Milliken. Victor Quiet: 1. Traffic noise morning, noon and evening from Chaffee College 2. Speeding of cars 3. No patrol of violators leaving track on street 4. Need a 4 way stop sing at corner of (Canestral ?) and Wilson • 5 NAME ADDRESS E-MAIL PHONE # PLEASE PRINT City of Rancho Cucamonga (WEST) '~ - rte;-f.f ~J ~ ~ % S~ C~tJtlf.~ ,~ ;) ~D ~t - 44 n / ~~ r LL ~b ~ (+-~J ~ l J ~+ L. r N t-C . L: N~f~Z l ;. ,a ~ sp.~~ ~ .d ' !' ~`~ Nlan)jt~11 SFiJ~.S Nr~1J ryb:4.;(J~J ~."c~fR;'-ink E'FAn-rucr~Y.~/~T ~jDr>$z-z b6-~ ,~4~r/~ ,. , ., , '~ ~ :buy ,~~,~,..-=-~..~, Ej ~~~-~~~ ~~ . . - ~,.- r ~ ~ ~~/ y. S f--~,v t~-- ~-- I Jinn 1-~~~e.~l ~ ~' I-~ ~1; /,~ , ~~_ ~~.1-P y~r l~~'~r` ~J/~o~-t~-~e-.~, v~-~" ~ b~ ~ i L( D ~, - , ~ ~J 2f~`r~ kr :~~ ~ ~~_ ~~~,~,~ ; 1 ~~'~-~ ~ ~ ~ s r~~ j~a . NAME ADDRESS E-MAIL PHONE # PLEASE PRINT City of Rancho Cucamonga (WEST) 1 . >~ . r ~, f K=.r- ~.-- v a i ~- _f:'=J n `~ ~Gif1 LO i /f ~~' ~~J '1 f~ J ~- l t~''I %~ -- I ~~ ~ ...----, f , _ .;~ M. ,~ _ ~ 1r ~I r l Ct,, ~ ~7 ~ ate...- ~ ~ '. . ~~~ fJ~ l~ ,,, • . City of Rancho Cucamonga {WEST) Name L'`l9 ~- ^~ ~ l'`~I//~~, ~~~~ Address ~ ~ ~l ~~y2~ 1 (Sv~'1 i~"`L~ Phone Num/ber q ~.Y ~ _1 ~ 5 E-Mail l ~{.L('~2J '' ~~"~CG2~ N'2 Question /Comment ~,~,~ ~"~ cam- c~S 1 ~~ , _ ; .,: j~~~~ ~ ~, cam. ~ ~ w~,,~s ~~`~``'``~ ~Q1~~~~ ~1 ~ `1 ~(/ • ity of Rancho Cucamonga (WEST) ne ~'"iF~ 4.~ ~ ~C2 1'~.&:.' ~JC:.' ~. tel. fi:;r~~_, cress lOq~~-- 1~/ !r! ~C^. t. ~-,; ~~..- c~ ~ j U p~ one Number ; l .. i ~ / ` ~~ C/o~ ail Joy .~,~<.~` < (<, b,,~~(rj':f7y~- ?, D1- ~-~, stion /Comment / ~ ,~ ' V~ ~.~_.~ , _ l `. ~'•.~ 4 • City of Rancho Cucamonga (WEST) ~/~~ i/~i,~v'~'~b/ti'~nI Name ~~'~~'/lr' ~~`~%'~~.~/l ~:eti ~sfi~ Address ~ij.i ~ ~l~l~ IYl ~F,00/d ~i _ Phone Numbe~~0'~~ ~-I ~6- ~ 12 v E-Mail /J~-T~J ~^^1 L-? L~'r•! ~Tr~Gi~/J~, n1~-r Question / Commerit -^-~ ~ ', ~ i to -~ ' ~ ,_ ~ ~ ~ ~; fj ~~iL'~ i • 1/V 1 [ ~(6'•IS t: CFA ~ _~^~ rc ~;f ~~ FF~ c ~tc2r7Jb ~ L'~c~5~! Ors f-r?ILc~~1G~•~ • • O N C C i~ N b Q1 •ri •.1 C U J~ +~ G ro ~ ~ N H W 'U r -I A ~0 1 -r ro ~ ~ a 'd w C • Cw 3aa w •~I N ro N 0 -a N O A [0 N ~ ~ N el C A m~ C A +~ U O >, C ,Y N -rV O N -•i H K .C f-I O N - ~ Hy- Nm~ro A •GUOro m a U o o~ U m ro~ ~ ~ -.~ C ~ CN NW .~av ro ,~ -u ro ro a, A N -.~ o o .c o .c -u ^ mx u A ~ o~Hw N C N N -.i N Al F N 3 N C N [T ro x c6 a •-i U P H r~ -~ H N U) N H •rl •fl N N W N 3 ro ~ O b N C C q W -ri U b a U C N -rl N O R7 O U C O N N O 1~ a •rl C b N _ d .C .~ O :~ N N b ro .-i C .-I C N O m -.~ w A H c ro r+ N .-i a~ --~ v a v ,~ H ++ a +-+ w -.+ a .c ~ m H +~ N C N a N b 3 A N C a O b A x r-{ N a H O N U N N % C +~ U ~-i H ?i O N 0 b ~ W C U ti -.i N iT -.1 N ~rl O r-I N b~ rl N O- O Crl FA a E Crl ~ w.-iA a UH a~ m -.~ .-~ -.a o -.~ -~ rl ro N u p u o o w 3 A m m ro m rn m romHa~a o N azsc G ~ .aNN'J c .~roN Kaa -., ~ ro H d x c m o ro ro a~ N c oNaa •xN CroA .-iH ~+ a u aoUOm~ ^+~+~ -~~nN No ro oJ Cn O a m .~ .c x •H rJ ro -.~ -~ v 3~ N N ~ w x N .-i a~ w£ X P7 C U A +~ w 7 ~~ 1 l -rl N O +~ 7 ?i C 7 O N b p ~ H LL'U O a ~ 01 b N -.i A 3 -H U ' N 'CS £ N q O O7 N b b U N T b O H b ~ cIJ H H ~ N 'O.i-~ ri 41 t0 N l! ~ y `p w td N N y U N N C N N~ .C ~ . '-L U T• O N O A f1. rl C •-1 N -.i N N N -rl N 1 a ~ ~~ mANVa-~ roro•-{ r HoW H a ~ i G n -pro C wmroa UC wud.i row a. O O U O C F. A b N a N +~ U N -N CS n ?i H -.+ -.+ +-+ O +-+ b a O% C .~ rJ C C`•/ ~ m w v- u 'o o a N a~ o -.~ m o N s -.~ r ~l i o v Cw N-.a g m ro H -.~ w N N f ro Nf m o ca x ro 'Z aK a~roEUOao - { . S ~ O m +~ H N U -6 3 H p +' +' W 'O m U H W x W C C U •-i X +~ N ro C N N G C 3 0 ro <J O U1 ~ Q) N 1~ w O ro -•i .C W rti N w -F~ N H r-i ~\~ U c T b N O C fi a w a N -rl b~ O rl W ` J N N N H N O N I t7' a C N ,C tT A '+-+ -rl 1 ro .- - .C N L N N A E A~ rt (~~ v N ••i ~rl ~+ G N +U ~ tJ ~ t~ ~.i .V C > O I N >, N ,C 61 C -.i N 7 U ,K -.i N O +~ rl c a~ b .i tT i+ O b 8 N ri O E ~ w .C Y L b C 3 a C -~ C +~ N .-I N O N T C O ++ w H ~-+ A N N v >+ H O ro C 0 3 U a 0 ._ 'gib ro ~°~ `3ero ~w~ -°I~ Nm G ~ ~' J m a u,c , ~ ~ri ttl N N E f0 J~ U -~ U N H H ~ d tb I fi O 7 • •rl A N a N -~1 U H a O A O O - ri .C O (te ~ U] •-I A N .'~ E N t~ A g ro M a U a l~ J-+ W w H LL F h a n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n A n C~ u 4. Initial Study :• Draft Environmental Checklist Form Project title: Wilson Avenue Extension 2. Lead agency name and address: The City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Development Department 1000 Civic Center Drive P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91729 3. Contact person and phone number: Walter Stickney (909)477-2740 Project location: The project is located in the northeastern portion of the City of Rancho Cucamonga in the County of San Bernardino. • 5. Project sponsor's name and address: The City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Development Department 10500 Civic Center Drive P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, Califomia 91729 6. General plan designation: Modified secondary with a Median Zoning: N/A 8. Description of project: Tltis project will extend Wilson Avenue for approximately one mile from East Avenue to Wardman Bullock Road, crossing the Etiwanda Creek. This portion of Wilson Avenue is to be extended in order to allow better fire and emergency vehicle access to the northeastem portions of the City. The extension will also relieve traffic near the Elementary school located on Banyan Avenue. Wilson Avenue is identified as a Modified Major Arterial with a median in the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan. Currently, no permanent road improvements exist within the project boundary. The roadway extension will be composed of two travel lanes in each direction, a median, bike lanes and a multipurpose trail. As proposed the roadway will have a sixty eight-foot curb to curb distance within a varying right-of--way up to I55 feet wide. The Etiwanda Creek runs perpendicular to the proposed roadway extension; crossings will be constructed to allow water within Wilson Creek to continue to flow below the Roadway. • Wilson Avenue Extension _1- vaizooa • 9. Surrounding land uses and setting: Existing and proposed residential uses surround the Wilson Avenue Extension area. The Etiwanda Creek flows from the north to the south and will pass below the completed Wilson Avenue extension. The project area is currently undeveloped, comprised of rocky terrain with various types of sporadic brush growth. 10. Other public agencies whose approval is or may be required (e.g., permits, financing approval, or participation agreement.) San Bernardino County Department of Fish and Game (1602 ennit Army Corp of Eneineers (40l permit) Santa Ana Reuional Water Ouality Control Board • ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED: The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. Aesthetics Agriculture Resources X Air Quality X Biological Resources Cultural Resources X Geology /Soils Hazards & Hazardous Materials X Hydrology /Water Quality X Land Use /Planning Mineral Resources X Noise Population /Housing Public Services Recreation X Transportation/Traffic Utilities /Service Systems X Mandatory Findings of Significance DETERMINATION: On the basis of this initial evaluation: I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. Wilson Avenue Extension -Z- 7/62008 X I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPOR'T' is required. I find that the proposed project MAY have a "potentially significant impact" or "potentially significant unless mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed Uy mitigation measures Uased on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL EvIPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have Ueen avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project, nothing further is required. ',~~////Jon Gil spie, City Traffic Engineer • Signature • Wilson Avenue Exfensiov -3- 7-~ -~~ Date Date 7/8!2008 • EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS: t il e Potentially Less Than Less Than No ` ' prolec c. d th 1. AESTHETICS -- Wot Significant- , Signifcaatwith: Signifcant. _ _ ~_Impact;=` Y - .: ,. , ~ , ,„' '• Impact ~ _ _ ~' Mitigation .--_ . or ti In Impact ~ _ • - :" ,: on corp a -. - _: :: a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic X vista? b) Substantially damage scenic resources, X including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? c) Substantially degrade the existing visual X character or quality of the site and its surroundings? d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare X which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the arc;i? Comments• a. and c.) Less Than Significant Impact. It is not anticipated that the extension of Wilson Avenue will impact a scenic vista. Wilson Avenue has been designated by the County of San Bernardino and the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan as a Scenic Corridor with a goal of preserving views from the Scenic Corridor to the surrounding • Mountains and lower elevations. Currently no permanent road improvements exist in the project area. The construction of this extension will create and establish additional opportunities to view the surrounding area and the scenic corridor. The project is not within a scenic vista and due to the overall low profile of the road extension project, the impact is considered to be less than significant. Therefore, this issue need not be addressed in detail in the EIR. b.) Less Than Significant Impact. There are no State Scenic Highways within the City of Rancho Cucamonga and there are no historic structures within the project site. The project area is currently partially disturbed by other construction projects in the area; few trees are present within the project footprint. No large rock outcroppings are present within the project area. It is not anticipated that there will be any impact. Therefore, this issue need not be addressed in detail in the EIR. d.) Potentially Significant Impact. The completed Wilson Avenue extension will include typical street lighting. This lighting will be consistent with other lighting types within the City and along other portions of Wilson Avenue. The project will add a new light source to the area that may create a significant impact. Therefore, this issue will be discussed further in the EIR to determine the potential impacts and mitigation measures.. • 7/82008 Wilson Avenue Extension -4- ~~ 2: AGRICULTURE ItESOURC>S: In Potentially Less,Than Less Than No'- determining whether impacts to agricultural Significant Significant with Significant .Impact resources are significant environmental - Impact - :Mitigation . Impact effects, lead agencies may refer to the Incorporation 'California`Agricultural Land Evaluation and 'Site Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the • j• _ ;~ _ California Dept: of Conscr~ahon as an~• ~ ~ - { ` z -~ ' optional model to; use in assessing impacts on tHe project:'- d farmland: Would iculture a a _ z _ . .' . n gr a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or X Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non- agricultural use? b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural X use, or a Williamson Act contract? c) Involve other changes in the existing X environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use? • Comments: a.) No Impact. The site is not designated as Prime Farmlands, Unique Farmland or Farmland of Statewide Importance. Therefore, this issue need not be addressed in detail in the EIR. b.) No Impact. There is no agriculturally zoned land within the City of Rancho Cucamonga or the Project site. There are also no Williamson Act Contracts within the City or project boundaries. Therefore, this issue need not be addressed in detail in the EIR. e.) No Impact. The project area includes no area currently designated as or being used as farmland. The project does not include changes to the environment that could result in the conversion of farmland to non- agricultural use. Therefore, this issue need not be addressed in detail in the EIR. 3.AIR QUALITY ..Where ava[l.[ble, the _ igi-[fieance cr[tei [ [ ~sfabl[shed by the Potentially Sign[ficants Less Than Significant with "Less.Than Significant ,'.I\'o Impact . s a'p~l[cablc air gi[~alrt~ manabement or'air c. '~ Impact _~ 17itigation impact ~ r ~ - pollut[oa contrtih;d[stricfmav 6e rel[ed upon to , Incorporation _ lE . ake thefollo~~•ii[g determinations Would the; m _ '+ ~ i :, < _ ; - ~ r _ _ ~ ~' - , t r '3 t - project: :. a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the X applicable air quality plan? b} Violate any air quality standard or contribute X substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? i • -- Wilson Avenue Extension -5- 7/8/2008 • c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net X increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial X pollutant concentrations? e) Create objectionable odors affecting a X substantial number of people? Comments: a. through d.) Potentially Significant Impact. CEQA requires that projects be consistent with the Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP). Only new or amended General Plan elements, Specific Plans and major projects need to undergo a consistency review. Due to the fact that the AQMP strategy is based on projections from local General Plans, projects that are consistent with the local General Plan are considered consistent with the air quality-related Regional Plan. The State CEQA guidelines define a significant effect on the environment as "a substantial adverse change in the physical condition which exists in the area affected by the proposed project". In order to determine whether or not the proposed project would cause a significant effect on the environment the impact of the project must be determined by examining the levels of emissions generated and its impacts on factors that affect air quality. • Sensitive receptors are defined as populations that are more susceptible to the effects of pollution than the population at large. The SCAQMD identifies the following as sensitive receptors: long term health care facilities, rehabilitation centers, convalescent centers, retirement homes, residences, schools, playgrounds, child care centers and athletic facilities. According to the SCAQMD, projects have the potential to create significant impacts if they are located within 0.25 miles of sensitive receptors. The sensitive receptors located near the Project are existing and proposed residences. Further review and analysis is required in order to determine the Project specific impacts to air quality. The Wilson Avenue EIR will review project related impacts and suggest mitigation measures in order to minimize and impacts related to air quality. e.) Less Than Significant Impact. The project includes the extension of a roadway that will be traveled by all vehicle types. The potential exisu for odors to be produced by vehicles traveling the roadway. It is anticipated that any odors produced would rapidly dissipate over a short distance, would not be affecting a substantial number of people and therefore this impact is considered to be less than significant. Therefore, this issue need not be addressed in detail in the EIR. • Wilson Avenue Extension -6- 7/8/2008 C 4: BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES -Would the`.: Potentially Less Than L;es"s Tftan No' project: - ~ Significant... Significant with i i Significant .'I t ' `.Impact _ - ':. - . ! Unpact Mit on gat _. ration I c mpac .: '.; ' . - - ,. orpo n a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either X directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any X riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service? c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally X protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? d) Interfere substantially with the movement of X any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances X protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community X Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? Comments: a.) Potentially Signif-cant Impact. A focused botanical survey was conducted by Tom Dodson & Associates (TDA) in May 2007. The report concluded that no state or federally listed endangered, threatened or special status plant species were observed or found to occur on the project site during the field survey. The project will, however, disrupt the continuity of an important habitat or habitat/wildlife corridor. A focused San Bernardino Kangaroo Rat (SBKR) Trapping Survey was conducted by TDA in April of 2007. While no SBKR were trapped or observed, two California species of special concern (little pocket mouse and San Diego pocket mouse) were found on the project site. The EIR will further review any potential impacts to Biological Resources and establish mitigation measures to reduce any impacts. • 7/8/2008 Wilson Avenue Extension -7- • b. through d.) Potentially Significant Impact. It is anticipated that the extension of the roadway through the undeveloped area could potentially displace and disturb plant and animal populations. A portion of the Project is within a proposed conservation area as indicated on exhibit IV-3 of the General Plan (Sensitive Biological Resources). Further analysis is required to assess biological resources, and potential impacts to riparian Habitats, wetlands, and other sensitive natural communities. There may be a significant impact to biological resources. The EIR will further review any potential impacts to Biological Resources and establish mitigation measures to reduce any impacts. e.,f.) No Impact. The project will not conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance, nor will it conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan. ., 5 CUL'I'URAI RESOURCES - Would the Potentially- Less Than ~, Less TEian Nb _ `~ ~ - t: Significant , Sign~ficantwith ,Significant Impact ro ec , p ' ~ ~ Impact '- 1VI-tigafion Impact - ` ' ` t f~ - Incoi=poration '{ - f'" ~, a} Cause a substantial adverse change in the X significance of a historical resource as defined in '15064.5? b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the X significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to ' 15064.5? c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique X paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? d) Disturb any human remains, including those X interred outside of formal cemeteries? Comments: a) No Impact. An Historical/Archeological Resources Survey Report was prepared by CRM TECH in July of 2007. The report concludes that no historical resources are located within the Project boundaries. No impacts to historical resources are expected to occur. Therefore, this issue need not be addressed in detail in the EIR. b) No Impact. An HistoricaUArcheological Resources Survey Report was prepared by CRM TECH in July of 2007. The City's General Plan states that limited paleontological resources exist within the City and no paleontological resources are known to exist within the project site. No impacts are anticipated. Therefore, this issue need not be addressed in detail in the EIR. c) No Impact. The City's General Plan states that limited archeological resources exist within the City and no archeological resources are known to exist within the project site. No impacts are anticipated. Therefore, this issue need not be addressed in detail in the EIR. d) No Impact. Human remains are not known to exist within the project site. However, existing State regulations are provided below in the event that remains are encountered during project construction. • _g_ 7~8i2oos Wilson Avenue Gatension • State Regulations • If human remains are unearthed during construction, State Health and safety Code Section 7050.5 dictates that no further disturbance shall occur until the County Coroner has made the necessary findings as to the origin and disposition of the remains pursuant to public resources Code Section 5097.98. • Should human remains be identified as a Native American burial, the project archaeologist shall coordinate with the appropriate Native American Representatives. • 6. GEOiLOGY AND SOILS Would they - eet r0 Potentially: Significant~~ Less'Tlian f Signs icantwith Less Than f - Stgni leant No :- -FI _ mpact p ~ r_ ,: .~ :,' ,;, ` , :. ..- ;Impact - 'Mitigation Impact ' -_ ~! ~.. ' ~~ ''' ... •-- ,; :: ;°_: = Incorporation - a) Expose people or structures to potential X substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as X delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? X iii} Seismic-related ground failure, including X liquefaction? iv) Landslides? X b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of X topsoil? c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is X unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in X Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to fife or property? e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting X the use of septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of waste water? Wilson Avenue Extension -9- 7/8/2008 • Comments: a. and c.) Potentially significant Impact. The project is located approximately 0.25 miles away from an Alquist- Priolo zone and also crosses the Etiwanda Creek. Due to the location there may be the potential for significant ground shaking, fault rupture or liquefaction. Further study will be necessary to adequately assess the soil stability and potential geologic impacts within the project area. The EIR will review potential Geologic impacts and suggest mitigation measures where necessary to minimize impacts. • b.) Less Than Significant Impact There may be the potential for erosion due to the projects construction. Construction impacts will be addressed in a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP). The SWPPP will identify Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be implemented to minimize any impact related to soil erosion during construction and ground disturbing activities. Therefore, this issue need not be addressed in detail in the EIR. d:) No Impact. General Plan Figure V-3, the project site consists of mostly rocky and sandy areas. Expansive soils consist of clays. Hazards from expansive soils are not expected. Therefore, this issue need not be addressed in detail in the EIR. e.) No Impact. The proposed project would not entail the use of sewer, septic tanks or wastewater disposal systems. Therefore, this issue need not be addressed in detail in the EIR. 7. HAZARDS AND I3AZAIZDOUS , , _ Potentially Less Than Less Than ~:. _ 10; , MATERIALS B kWould the project ;~ Significant Significant: with Significant Impact ~~; , ~ ,; ~.~; - . ,,, t ` - - .T'mpact ,`Mitigation 7ricorporation 'i Impact a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the X environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the X environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous X or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? d} Be located on a site which is included on a list ~ of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? e) For a project located within an airport land use X plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? f) For a project within the vicinity of a private X airstrip, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? • Wilson Avenue Extension -10- 7/8/2008 • g) Impair implementation of or physically X interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk X of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? Comments• a.) Less Than Significant [mpact. The proposed project entails the construction of a new section of roadway and would not involve the transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials, other than the normal transport of materials that may occur on municipal roads throughout the area as well as those materials used for construction. The transport of potentially hazardous materials is expected but is not expected to create a significant hazard to the public since hazardous materials transport is not the main function of the project. It is expected that any impact will be less than significant. Therefore, this issue need not be addressed in detail in the EIR. b.) No Impact. The construction of the Wilson Avenue Extension, because it does not support the use or storage of hazardous materials during its operation would riot cause long term impacts concerning hazards or hazardous materials. During the construction period, standard best management practices will be implemented to ensure that all hazardous materials normally used for construction activities are stored properly and that no hazards occur during the construction phase of the project. Therefore, this issue need not be addressed in detail in the EIR. c.) No Impact. The proposed Wilson Avenue Extension is not located within one-quarter mile of any school. Therefore the project will have no impact. Therefore, this issue need not be addressed in detail in the EIR. • d.) No Impact. The project is not located on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5, Therefore, this issue need not be addressed in detail in the EIR. e.) No Impact. The project is not located within an airport land use plan. The project site is approximately 9 miles northeast of the Ontario International Airport. Therefore, this issue need not be addressed in detail in the EIR. f.) No Impact. There are no private airstrips within the immediate area of the project. Therefore, this issue need not be addressed in detail in the EIR. g. and h.) No Impact. The proposed project would not have any adverse impact on an adopted emergency response plan or emergency plan. The proposed project will improve area circulation as well as emergency access and routes for evacuation. Therefore, this issue need not be addressed in detail in the EIR. • Wilson Avenue Extension -11- 782008 U • 8: HYDROLOGY AND'WATER QUALITY-- Potentially ~ Less Than Less Than No Would the project: ' ' < ~ .Significant m f ~ a Significant. with tion :bliti Significant Imp ct `.Impact :. ;,. ;. p c ..; I ga c ~,. .. a -;. Incorporation a) Violate any water quality standards or waste X discharge requirements? b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or X interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre- existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the X alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site? d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or X substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or off-site? e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned X stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? X g) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard X Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? h) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures which would impede or redirect flood X flows? i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving flooding, X including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? X Wilson Avenue Extension 12- 7/8/2008 • Comments: a.) Less Than Significant Impact. Water quality could be temporarily degraded during construction activities. I-Iowever, a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) will be provided for this project as required by the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB). The SWPPP will detail Best Management Practices (BMPs) to be implemented in order to minimize impacts. With the implementation of the required BMPs during project construction, impacts will be kept to level that is less than significant. During operation the project would create urban pollutants typical of any roadway development, including oils and other substances. It is not anticipated that these pollutants will create a significant impact. Therefore, this issue need not be addressed in detail in the EIR. b.) Less than Significant Impact. The proposed project would not require the consumption of groundwater supplies. The project crosses the Etiwanda Spreading grounds as shown in Exhibit IV-2 of the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan. There may be the potential for interference with groundwater recharge. However, due to the limited project footprint, a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table is not expected. Impacts in regard to this issue are expected to be less than significant. Therefore, this issue need not be addressed in detail in the EIR. c. and d.) Less than Significant Impact. The proposed project will not alter existing drainage patterns. Within the Project area there are existing County Master Drainage Plan facilities that convey flows below the existing dirt road in the project area. The proposed project is expected to maintain the location of these existing drainage facilities without altering drainage patterns or flows. A less than significant impact is anticipated. Therefore, this issue need not be addressed in detail in the EIR. e. and f) No Impact. The project will continue to allow drainage to flow as it does currently. The proposed project would not create or contribute runoff water that would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems, and would not provide or contribute to substantial additional sources of polluted runoff. The roadway improvements proposed as part of this Project may create an additional source of polluted runoff from the • Project. Roadway improvements will include features to maintain water quality and reduce any polluted runoff to a level that is less than significant. Therefore, this issue need not be addressed in detail in the EIR. g.) No Impact. Housing is not proposed as any part of this project. No impacts are expected. Therefore, this issue need not be addressed in detail in the EIR. h.) Less Than Significant Impact. Current San Bernardino County Flood Control District improvements and flood control improvements by other proposed development will protect the project area from flooding. Smaller localized drainage facilities will be incorporated in to the Project to reduce any risk of flooding. Therefore, this issue need not be addressed in detail in the EIR. i.) Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed project crosses the Etiwanda Creek. The failure of levees or dams upstream of the project could potentially impact the roadway structure of the project. However, the upstream and surrounding flood control improvements are expected to minimize the potential for flooding in the area. No occupied structures will be built as part of the project and therefore the potential for injury or death is negligible. Therefore, this issue need not be addressed in detail in the EIR. j.) Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed project is not near any large water bodies, thus the project would not be affected by seiche, or tsunamis. Though the potential for mudflows in this area are low, upstream flood control basins and other improvements would protect the project from any impacts in the case of a mudflow. Therefore, this issue need not be addressed in detail in the EIR. • Wilson Avenue Extension -13- 7/8/2008 • 9. LAND' USE ANA PLANNING.'- Would the Potentially Less Than Less Than No `~ ' Significant., Significant with Significant Impact project: - Impact- - Aiitigation. Impact ;, ~' - ~ - .. ... _ : , . .~. Incorporation _. . X a) Physically divide an established community? b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not X limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community X conservation plan? Comments• a.) No Impact. The proposed project will not divide an established community, currently no established community exists directly adjacent to the project site. One of the goals of this project is to provide connectivity from the eastern to the western parts of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. This extension will close the gap between portions of the existing community. Therefore, this issue need not be addressed in detail in the EIR. b.} No Impact. Tl~e proposed Wilson Avenue extension is will not conflict with any Specific Plan or General Plan. • The alignment and proposed roadway is indicated within the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan and the project is being sponsored by the City as part of its General Plan buildout. Therefore, this issue need not be addressed in detail in the EIR. c.) No Impact. The proposed Wilson Avenue extension is will not conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan. 10 'MINERAL RESOURCES Would the Pofenhally Les"s Th•in 'Less Tlian ~ ` No , ~" 'plolect ~ .. -- ~_ " Signtficant Stgnilic.ant with Stgntftcant ` Impact ~ ~.- r ~'. ~` ~.. - - ''-Impact ~ ~ - ~ Mitigation " ?Impact - - :Incorporation - a) Result in the loss of availability of a known X mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally- important mineral resource recovery site X delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? Comments• a. and b.) No Impact. No regionally significant mineral or aggregate resources are located within the project area based on Figure IV-1 of the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan. The extension of Wilson Avenue will have no impact on any valuable mineral resources. Therefore, this issue need not be addressed in detail in the EIR. Wi{son Avenue Extension -14- 7/8/2008 • • Comments• a. through d.) Potentially Significant Impact. It is anticipated that the construction and operation of the Wilson Avenue Extension could become a significant new noise source in the project area. The Project will generate noise that is above the current ambient noise level both temporarily and permanently. Further analysis is required to assess potential noise impacts. The EIR will further review potential noise impacts and establish mitigation measures to reduce any impacts. 11. NOISE -- Would the'projecfresult in. Patentialty Less Than Less Tfian ` No`-. -. Significant Significant with Significant _ Impact; ,: ~ - ,,~;: = Iiupact, '11_Iitigation Impact Incorporation a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the X local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne X noise levels? c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels X existing without the project? d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above X levels existing without the project? e) For a project located within an airport land use X plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? ~ For a project within the vicinity of a private X airstrip, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? e.) No Impact. The proposed project is not within an airport land use plan or within two miles of an airport. Therefore, this issue need not be addressed in detail in the EIR. f.) No Impact. The proposed project is not within the vicinity of a private airstrip. No impacts are expected. Therefore, this issue need not be addressed in detail in the EIR. • -15- ~~s~zoo8 Wilson Avenue Extension ~~ J _ .. _.. 12. POPULATION AND HOUSING -- Would - Potentially.. Less Than -. Less Than No ' - - the project: $ignificant. Significant with `Significant Impact.. , ~: - -~ - ~ ::' x-. ~: I-4.: Impact ' - - Mitigation ' .:. - Impact- ` _ .,.. _• ;._ ' . ' . :. -: .Incorporation ., , a) Induce substantial population growth in an X area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? X b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? c) Displace substantial numbers of people, X necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? Comments• a.) Less Than Significant Impact By creating an east to west connection with in the City it is anticipated that there may be some growth inducing impact. The portion of the roadway to be constructed will allow residents to more easily travel to areas that are currently undeveloped. It should be noted that this roadway extension does not extend into areas that are not currently reachable by the public. Any population growth if any due to this project would not be substantial and would have less than a significant impact. Therefore, this issue need not be addressed in detail in the EIR. • b. and c.) No Impact The proposed project will extend an existing road through an undeveloped open space area. No housing or people will be displaced. Therefore, this issue need not be addressed in detail in the EIR. r~ a >: `_ - Less Chan 13 ~ YUBLIC SERVICES; ,, , u s ~ Potenttally - - StQntficant= Significantw~th Less Than , 5i~n~ficant No ~ - .Impact 1 ,' ° E , - ~ °, r, - - + .r. - - ~~~ Impact t Baton Mti Incorporation. Impact - - Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: a) Fire protection? X b) Police protection? X c) Schools? X d) Parks? X e) Other public facilities? X Wilson Avenue Extension -I6- 7/8f2008 • Comments: a. through e.) Less Than Significant Impact The main goal of this project is to provide improved access for public services such as police and fire protection to northeastern parts of the City. It is expected that police and fire response times will be improved by this project. Public schools will not be impacted by this project since this project specifically will not add a~ly population to the area or alter district boundaries. There is a slight possibility that the added convenience of a more direct route to park areas may increase their use. Any impacts to parks will be less than significant. Therefore, this issue need not be addressed in detail in the EIR. 14: RECREATION ' + r } :L - ' +- - ' :~ ~; _ ~,_ . =Potentially Significant ' Impact- ;Less Ttia-n Significant rv~th Mitigation .. - Incorporation ~_Less Than Significant --Impact No ~. _ Impact =_ ~, - - - a) Would the project increase the use of existing X neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? X b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? Comments: a) Less Than Significant Impact The proposed project may increase the ability of residents in the area to get to and • from recreational facilities more easily. This could increase the use of these facilities. It is estimated that any increase in use would be minimal and that any impact would be less than significant. Therefore, this issue need not be addressed in detail in the EIR. b) No Impact The proposed roadway extension includes a multipurpose trail which is considered to be a recreational amenity. The project will not require the construction or expansion of any additional recreational facilities. Therefore, this issue need not be addressed in detail in the EIR. 15 TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC '- Would the project ~=. _ ~ _ i-: ' ~ ~ - ~ _ ~~- P~tentiully Significant ' ~' Impact: "- Less Than 5ign~ficant_with '-Mitigation ~I_ncorporation ~ Less, Than Significant ~ Impact No: Impact _ ~ _ a} Cause an increase in traffic which is substantial X in relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (i.e., result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections}? b) Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a X level of service standard established by the county congestion management agency far designated roads or highways? • 7/88008 Wilson Avenue Extension "l~" c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, X including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? X d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? X e) Result in inadequate emergency access? ~ Result in inadequate parking capacity? X X g) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs supporting alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? Comments• a. and b.) Potentially Significant Impact. The extension of Wilson Avenue may have the potential to have increased traffic impacts in relation to the existing load and capacity of the street system. The potential exists for the project to create traffic that will exceed the local service standards. The EIR will further review any potential impacts to vehicle traffic and establish mitigation measures to reduce any impacts if necessary. c.) No Impact. Due to the proposed nature and scope of this roadway extension project implementation would not impact air traffic. Therefore, this issue need not be addressed in detail in the EIR. • d.) No Impact The extension of Wilson Avenue is a relatively straight and flat one mile stretch of roadway. No dangerous intersections are proposed and the road is expected to be used by common vehicles. No Impact is anticipated. Therefore, this issue need not be addressed in detail in the EIR. e.) No Impact The proposed project is a roadway extension of approximately one mile. One of the main goals of this project is to improve emergency access to the northeastern parts of the City. Therefore, this issue need not be addressed in detail in the EIR. L) No Impact The project will not result in inadequate parking capacity. Parking will not be provided along the roadway, no parking is required in this area and no demand for parking on the street in this area is anticipated. g.) No Impact The project will not violate any adapted policies, plans or programs supporting alternative transportation. Multipurpose trails and bike lanes are included as part of the planned roadway extension and will promote alternative transportation methods. Therefore, this issue need not be addressed in detail in the EIR. Potentrally': ~ 16`:LTILITIE,S AND SERVICE SYSTEMS L'ess Than .Less Than No,r _ 'Would the ro ect ~ , Signrfic'tnt= P J Srgnificant nrth Stgmficant ~ Impact ~ ~ ~ Impact. t ~y~ ~ ~'Vhttgatto'n Impact -~ ~~ :- . r r ~ ^ `~ ~ ~ ~ 5„ ~r ~.- > ...y - .~ .. _ Tncorporation - ,;~ i - - a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of X the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? • Wilson Avenue Extension -18- 7182008 • • b) Require or result in the construction of new X water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? c) Require or result in the construction of new X storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? d) Have sufficient water supplies available to X serve the project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? e) Result in a determination by the wastewater X treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project=s projected demand in addition to the provider=s existing commitments? f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient X permitted capacity to accommodate the project=s solid waste disposal needs? g) Comply with federal, state, and local statutes X and regulations related to solid waste? Comments: a. and b.) No Impact The proposed Wilson Avenue extension will produce no wastewater and therefore will not exceed any wastewater treatment requirements or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities. Therefore, this issue need not be addressed in detail in the EIR. c) No Impact. As part of the Wilson Avenue extension new storm water drainage facilities will be constructed in the form of culverts that pass below the roadway to convey drainage flows. No additional drainage structures are to be constructed that will have an environmental impact. Therefore, this issue need not be addressed in detail in the EIR. d) No Impact The proposed project is a roadway extension and will have a negligible water demand. The project is not expected to have any impact on water supplies. Therefore, this issue need not be addressed in detail in the EIR. e) No Impact The proposed Wilson Avenue extension will produce no wastewater and therefore will not exceed any wastewater treatment capacities or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities. Therefore, this issue need not be addressed in detail in the EIR. f. and g.) No Impact The Project is a roadway extension and will generate negligible amounts of solid waste. The project will not impact local landfills and will comply with all regulations regarding solid waste. Therefore, this issue need not be addressed in detail in the EIR. • Wilson Avenue Extension -19- 7!82008 • 17. MANDATORY FINllINGS OF Potentially Less Than ~ Less Than ~ No ; SIGNIFICANCE -- .r,+• i Significant Im ct ~= ~ Significant with tion• Miti Significant Impact Impact .- pa ga tion I r or c a n o p a) Does the project have the potential to degrade X the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b) Does the project have impacts that are X individually limited, but cu-nulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)? c) Does the project have environmental effects X which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? Comments• a.) Potentially Significant Impact. As stated in Responses 4(a) through 4(f) (Biological Resources) further study is required. The EIR for the project will further analyze and review these impacts. . b.) Potentially Significant Impact. A review of cumulative impacts for each issue area that has been identified as potentially significant is required pursuant to section 15130 of the CEQA Guidelines. The EIR for the project will further analyze and review these impacts. e.) Potentially Significant Impact. The proposed Project could potentially cause adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly; further study is required. The EIR for the project will further analyze and review these impacts. • Wilson Avenue Extension -2~- 7/8/2008 • 5. Comment Letter/Response to Comment (Response forthcoming. Being finalized to reflect Alternative C) • ~ ~ ~ ~ California Natural Resources Agency ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER Governor - DEPARTMENT OFFISH AND GAME JOHN MCCAMMAN, Direcfor http'//www dfg.ca.gov =~ Inland Deserts Region 3602 Inland Empire Blvd., Suite C-200 Ontario, CA 91764 In ~ ~ L~ u ~ ~ ~„~ (909) 484-0167 III1Unnn114JAlAllt 111 ,jIJL. 1.?'~01~ July 9, 2010 Ct79 OF RANO}io cUOAMONGA q ~nnie;Yw;r..,y,w,u Li~UJtt.:-KLr~S U1 i 1V Mr. WalterStickney City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civlc Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Re: Draft Environmental Impact Report for the Wilson Avenue Extension SCH No. 2008071044 Dear Mr. Stickney The Department of Fish and Game (Department) appreciates this opportunity to comment • on the Draft Environmental Impact Report for the extension of Wilson Avenue from East Avenue to Wardman Bullock Road. The Department is responding as a Trustee Agency for fish and wildlife resources [Fish and Game Code sections 711.7 and 1802 and the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines (CEQA) section 15386] and as a Responsible Agency regarding any discretionary actions (CEQA Guidelines section 15381), such as a Lake and Streambed Alteration Agreement (Section 1600 et seq.) or a California Endangered Species Incidental Take Permit (Fish and Game Code Sections 2080 and 2080.1). For this project the Department will be acting as both a Responsible and Trustee Agency. Per section 15096 of the CEQA statute, as a Responsible Agency the Department is obligated to focus its comments on any inadequacies of the environmental document and any additional alternatives or mitigation measures which the EIR should include. The site is located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino and would connect East Avenue with Wardman Bullock Road. The project is located on the Etiwanda Fan. To the north is open space, to the west residential development, to the east residential development and to the south open space and some development. The City of Rancho Cucamonga is proposing to improve a one and one-half mile long stretch of unimproved Wilson Avenue and an additional 300 feet south from the terminus of Wilson Avenue and East Avenue. The site is currently vacant land with a raised earthen roadbed. Project improvements consist of curbs, gutters, lighting, landscaping, paving and drainage improvements to Etiwanda Creek. • The project would encroach into a 118-acre conservation easement established by the County of San Bernardino Flood Control District as part of the Etiwanda Creek flood control facilities. The primary flows of Etiwanda Creek will continue to be conveyed via an existing fully improved channel under the existing earthen roadbed. Conserving California's `GUiCdCfe Since 1870 'DFCg - t J • Draft Environmental Impact Report- Wilson Avenue Extension -- SCH 2008071044 City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino Page 2 of 4 , Recommended Additional Measures The Department recommends that the Lead Agency clarify the issues raised below and provide a response to these comments in the Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR). ~'- Z 1. Impacts to existing conservation easement lands shall be mitigated for on a minimum ~6-3 5:1 mitigation to impact ratio; 2. Impacfs to Riversidean Alluvial Fan Sage Scrub (RAFSS) outside of the flFV _ 4- Conservation Easement shall be mitigated on a 3:1 mitigation to impact ratio- 3. A detailed jurisdictional delineation of State Waters to identify and analyze direct, indirect, temporary and permanent impacts and provide mitigation for those impacts ~-5 at a minimum 3:1 mitigation to impact ratio; 4. Updated trapping surveys should be conducted for San Bernardino kangaroo rat; ~-ra 5. An updated botanical survey should be conducted using the Department's 2009- Protocols for Surveying and Evaluating Impacts to Special Status native Plant l~G--1 Populations and Natural Communities: 6. Fencing should be placed along the road right-of-way to help minimize roa i an ~'~~' trash dispersal onto conservation lands; 7. Revegetation of disturbed land with RAFSS; ~' `f 8, Provide a monitoring and maintenance plan for revegetated habitat; YX-~z- to 9. Mitigation should be provided for the loss of SBKR critical habitat; and t~ -! t 10 . An analysis of the cumulative impacts an RAFFS and the Etiwanda Fan. ~- t2- Biolooical Resources The proposed project is 12.68 acres. Approximately 40% of the site is occupied by disturbed RAFSS habitat. The site is within the historic range of the San Bernardino kangaroo rat (Dipodomys merriami parvus) (SBKR), however no SBKR were trapped. Focused surveys for this species were conducted In September of 2007. Because the site area contains ~` 13 historical habitat and was recently occupied, updated focus surveys should be conducted per the United States Department of Fish and ~Idlife protocol. Temporary impacts will occur on 3.82 acres of land. Permanent impacts consist of 6.87 acres, of which 0.27 acres are located within the Conservation Easement. 1.37 acres of the site has been previously disturbed. The southern part of the Conservation Easement abuts the northern portion of the project. The encroachment consists of 0.45 acres. The FEIR should include a discussion of the provisions of the Conservation Easement, the process for amending it and whether the resource agencies must be consulted regarding changes in the Conservation Easement. The Department recommends the City avoid encroaching on the Conservation Easement altogether. ' The Department is concerned about the following species and issues: impacts to the conservation easement; compounding impacts to sensitive habitats; permanent loss of conservation easement lands, impacts to State jurisdictional waters, out-of-date focused surveys for San Bemardino kangaroo rat, and potential growth-inducing impacts of the project ~- t4 47Fc~~ iy • Draft Environmental Impact Report- Wilson Avenue Extension -- SCH 2008071044 • City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino Page 3 of 4 • Impacts and Mitigation The Department responded in April 2010 to another 1Nilson Avenue Extension project that' similar to this project. The Department requests that projects that are related be addressed in a single document so that the Department can evaluate the cumulative impacts of the project as a whole. Section 14(a) of Appendix G of the CEQA Guidelines provides an outline for significant biological impacts. Section (a) asks whether the project will have a substantial adverse effect "...either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species...". Section (b) asks, in part, whether the project will have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified by the California Department of Fish and Game. The project will result in the loss of conservation easement land, impacts to jurisdictional waters and the loss of critical habitat for the Federally-endangered SBKR. Riversidean Fan Sage Scrub is included in the Department's "Sensitivity of Top Priority Rare Natural Communities in Southern California" as a 51.1 "very threatened" community. A 1997 document entitled "Classification of Alluvial Scrub in Los Angeles, Riverside and San Bernardino Counties" characterizes RAFSS as a "distinctive and rare plant community" that is now restricted to scattered fragments due to urbanization and alteration of the natural hydrology of Southem California river and stream systems. The Department views the Etiwanda alluvial fan as an extremely important ecological area. Streambed Alteration Agreements and CEQA The site is located on the Etiwanda Fan. A jurisdictional delineation for streambeds and associated riparian and RAFFS habitat was not conducted on the project site. The document did not include an impacts analysis or provide mitigation for the loss of Sfate waters. ___ If the CEQA documents do not fully identify potential impacts to lakes, streams, and associated resources and provide adequate avoidance, mitigation, monitoring, funding sources, a habitat management plan and reporting commitments, additional CEQA documentation will be required prior to execution (signing) of the Agreement. In order to avoid delays or repetition of the CEQA process, potential impacts to a stream or lake, as well as avoidance and mitigation measures need to be discussed within this CEQA rlnriimen4 __ The Department opposes the elimination of drainages, Takes and their associated habitats. The Department recommends avoiding the stream and riparian habitat to the greatest extent possible. Any unavoidable impacts need to be compensated with the creation and/or restoration of in-kind habitat either on-site or off-site at a minimum 3:1 replacement-to- impact ratio, depending on the Impacts and proposed mitigation. Additional mitigation requirements through the Department's Streambed Alteration Agreement process may be required depending on the quality of habitat impacted, proposed mitigation, project design, and other factors. ~6- 1(0 fib- l1 DrYe- !$ (IFl3- Iq Dr6 -Z.~ Draft Environmental Impact Report- Wilson Avenue Extension -- SCH 2006071044 • City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino Page 4 of 4 We recommend submitting a notification early on, since modification of the proposed project may be required to avoid or reduce impacts to fish and wildlife resources. To obtain a Streambed Alteration Agreement notification package, please call (562) 430-7924. The following information will be required for the processing of a Streambed Alteration Agreement and the Department recommends incorporating this information to avoid subsequent CEQA documentation and project delays; 1) Delineation of lakes, streams, and associated habitat that will be temporarily and/or permanenfly impacted by the proposed project (include an estimate of impact to each habitat type); I 2) Discussion of avoidance measures to reduce project impacts; and, 3) Discussion of potential mitigation measures required to reduce 'the project impacts to a level of insignificance. Section 15370 of the CEQA guidelines includes a definition of mitigation. It states that mitigation includes: 1) Avoiding the impact altogether by not taking a certain action or parts of an action, 2) Minimizing impacts by limiting the degree or. magnitude of the action and its implementation, 3) Rectifying the impact by repairing, rehabilifating, or restoring the impacted • environment, 4) Reducing or eliminating the impact over time by preservation and maintenance operations during the life of the action, 5) Compensating forihe impact by replacing or providing substitute resources or environments. In the absence of specific mitigation measures in the CEQA documents, the Department believes that it cannot fulfill its obligations as a Trustee and Responsible Agency for fish and wildlife resources. Permit negotiations conducted after and outside of the CEQA process deprive the public of its rights to know what project impacts are and how they are being mitigated in violation of CEQA Section 15002. Also, because mitigation to offset the impacts was not identified in the CEQA document, the Department does not believe that the Lead Agency can make the determination that impacts to jurisdictional drainages and/or riparian habitat are "less than significant" without knowing what the specific impacts and mitigation measures are that will reduce those impacts. Thank you for this opportunity to comment. Please contact Robin Maloney-Rames at (909) 980-3818, if you have any questions regarding this letfer. Scientist LAG -21 ~~Zy- Appendix F Focused San Bernardino Kangaroo Rat 2011 Trapping Survey Wilson Avenue (East) Extension Project Focused San Bernardino Kangaroo Rat (Dipodomys Merriami Parvus) 2011 Trapping Survey Report Between Wardman Bullock Road & East Avenue, City Of Rancho Cucamonga San Bernardino County, California, USGS -Cucamonga Peak, Township 1 North, Range 6 West, Sections 21, 22, 27, and 28, S.B.M. Prepared for: AEI-CASC Engineering, Inc. Attn: Steve Hosford, P.E. 937 S. Via Lata, Suite 500 Colton, CA 92324 (909) 783-0101 ext. 5390 u Prepared by: Tom Dodson & Associates 2150 N. Arrowhead Avenue San Bernardino, CA 92405 (909)882-3612 Certification: I hereby certify that the statements furnished herein, and in the attached exhibits present data and information required for this Biological Survey to the best of my ability, and the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. USPWS permit No. (TE-094306-0) ~ ~~~~ ~~ Shay E. Lawrey July 2011 Table of Contents 1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................ ..............1 2 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING ...................................................................................................... ..............1 2.1 LISTED SPECIES & SENSITIVE HABITAT POTENTIALLY IN THE SBKR ANALYSIS AREA ............... ................2 2.1.1 SBKR ..................................................................................................................................... ...............2 2.1.2 RAFSS ..................................................................................................................:................ ...............3 3 METHODS ..................................................................................................................................... ...............4 3.1 SBKR TRAPPING SURVEY ............................................................................................................ ................4 3.2 JURISDICTIDNAL DELINEATIDN ...................................................................................................... ................4 4 RESULTS ...................................................................................................................................... ...............a 4.1 SBKR TRAPPING SURVEY ............................................................................................................ ................6 TOTAL IMPACTS = 4 ACRES .................................................................................................... ...............6 4.2 .JURISDICTIONAL DELINEATION ...................................................................................................... ................6 5 CONCLUSIONS ............................................................................................................................ ...............7 6 APPLICABLE REGULATIONS...... ...........7 6.1 CLEAN WATER ACT (CWA) ............................................................................... ...........................................7 6. i.1 U. S. Army Corps of Engineers ............................................................... ...........................................7 6.2 PORTER-COLOGNE WATER QUALITY CONTROL ACT ........................................ ...........................................7 6.2.1 Regional Water Qualify Control Board ................................................... ..........................................8 • 6.3 CALIFORNIA FISH AND GAME CODE ................................................................... ...........................................8 6.3.1 California Department of Fish and Game ............................................. ...........................................8 6.4 FEDERAL ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT .............................................................. ..............................:............9 6.4.1 U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service ................................................................ ...........................................9 7 LITERATURE CITED .......................................................................................... ...................................... SO TABLES Table 1. Survey dates, weather conditions, and moon phases Table 2. Rodent species trapped FIGURES (located at the end of the document) Figure 1. Regional Location Figure 2. Vicintiy Map Figure 3. Topographical Map of Project Site Location Figure 4. Critical Habitat within Project Impact Area Figure 5. Habitat Map Figure 6. Engineers Drawing of Area of Disturbance Figure 7. Trap line Locations APPENDICES Appendix 1. Site Photos Appendix 2. Floral Compendium • - Wilson Avenue (East) Extension 2071 SKBR Survey II 1 Introduction The City of Rancho Cucamonga proposes to extend Wilson Avenue from East Avenue to Wardman Bullock Avenue. The purpose of this report is to provide information as to the presence or absence of the federally listed as Endangered San Bernardino kangaroo rat (SBKR) [Dipodomys merriami parvus] and to determine to what extent the Wilson Avenue (East) Project may affect this species and its designated critical habitat. On behalf of AEI-CASC Engineering, Inc. (AEI-CASC), Tom Dodson & Associates (TDA) conducted a focused San Bernardino kangaroo rat (SBKR) [Dipodomys merriami parvus] trapping survey along the proposed Wilson Avenue (East) Project area. This survey effort served to update the original focused SBKR survey conducted in the project area in 2006. Between March 12 and 17, 2011, TDA Biologists, Shay Lawrey conducted the focused survey within the "SBKR analysis area', in accordance with the provisions of her federal permit (USFWS perrnit No. TE-094308-0). As in 2006, no SBKR were trapped over the course of the 5-night survey. Given the absence of SBKR within the analysis area, there is no risk of taking individuals of this species in conjunction with implementing the proposed project. Although, the project will not result in the loss of a federally listed species, it will result in the modification of critical habitat. In January 10, 2011 the Court rejected the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Services' (USFWS's) 2008 revised SBKR critical habitat designation (FR 73, No. 202). As a result of this decision the Project area falls within SBKR critical habitat that was designated by the USFWS in 2002 (67 FR 19812). Therefore, consultation with the USFWS will be required to address impacts to SBKR critical habitat. • 2 Environmental Setting The project site is located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County, California. The project site can be found on the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) -Cucamonga Peak Quadrangle, 7.5 Minute Series, Township 1 North, Range 6 West, Sections 21, 22, 27, and 28 (Figures 1-3). The proposed project is located on the Etiwanda Creek alluvial fan. Sandy dry wash tributaries to and of the Etiwanda Debris Basin occur within and/or adjacent to the Project alignment. Elevation within the project area is approximately 1,820 above mean sea level. The terrain of the project area consists of a boulder-littered floodplain, sloping downward to at approximately 1.5 percent from the northeast to the southwest. The project area is surrounded by rugged foothill topography and alluvial fan. The land uses in the vicinity of Wilson Avenue (East) alignment include residences to the south, east and west, flood control debris basin and conservation easement to the north. Vacant land is adjacent to the alignment consisting of low quality alluvial sage scrub habitat to the north and high quality to the south below the debris basin. The local area climate is semi-arid, with an average annual temperature of 67°F and a range from 31- 103°F. The rainy season begins in November and continues through March, with the quantity and frequency of rain varying from year to year. The average annual rainfall is approximately 18.1 inches. The general vicinity of the project area consists of open space, vacant land, and suburban residential development. The surrounding land uses are a combination of residential, open space, utility easements, and government uses. The ground cover in the project area consist of an existing dirt road, valley and foothill grasslands, • bouldery-sandy river wash and Riversidean alluvial fan sage scrub (RAFSS) habitat. RAFSS is a Wilson Avenue (East) Extension 1 2011 SKBR Survey • subtype of the more widely known Riversidean sage scrub, and is described as open vegetation adapted to alluvial fans and outwashes. RAFSS is considered a distinct and rare plant community found primarily on alluvial fans and floodplains along the southern bases of the Transverse Ranges and portions of the Peninsular Ranges in southern California. RAFSS is composed of an assortment of drought deciduous shrubs and larger evergreen woody shrubs such as Yerba Santa (Eriodicfyon trichocalyx), California sagebrush (Artemisia Californica), buckwheat (Eriogonum fasciculatum), golden currant (Ribes aureum), California Croton (Croton californica), and white sage (Salvia apiana). The RAFSS plant communities or habitats found within the City of Rancho Cucamonga and its sphere of influence are considered a sensitive biological resource by several regulatory and conservation agencies including the USFWS, California Department of Fish and Game (CDFG), and California Native Plant Society (GNPs). Approximately 65% of the land adjacent to the Project alignment is comprised of RAFSS which provides habitat for a myriad of regionally sensitive flora and fauna, unique to this region. Listed species identified to have a potential to occur within the vicinity of the project area include the San Bernardino kangaroo rat (SBKR) [Dipodomys mariami parvus] and coastal California gnatcatcher (CAGN) [Polioptila californica ca/ifornica]. The project is mapped within SBKR critical habitat and the project site is considered suitable for SBKR. 2.1 Listed Species & Sensitive Habitat Potentially in the SBKR Analysis Area The California Natural Diversity Data Base (CNDDB), literature references, and related environmental • documents were examined to obtain information on species occurrences in the project area. According to the CNDDB, 23 sensitive species and two sensitive habitat types have been documented in the Cucamonga Peak USGS quadrangle. Of these 23 sensitive species 2 listed animal species and 3 rare botanical species have a potential to occur within the vicinity of the project area. The two (2) listed animal species are the SBKR and CAGN and the three (3) rare botanical species are Plummer's mariposa-lily [Calochortus plummerae], Parry's spineflower [Chorizanthe parry; var. parry;], mesa horkelia [Horkelia cuneata ssp. puberula]. The habitat types v~ithin the project area include RAFSS, small blocks of chaparral, valley and foothill grasslands, and two dry sandy wash areas. The overall project area falls within the historic range of the federally listed SBKR and CAGN. Based on the habitat conditions within the project area, the project site is considered suitable for SBKR, CAGN. Due to historical occurrences and the presence of suitable habitat within the project area focused protocol surveys were conducted for SBKR and CAGN. Since the primary focus of this report is SBKR, basic background information is provided below for SBKR and RAFFS only. The 2006 focused botanical report and the 2006 and 2011 CAGN protocol survey reports were prepared and submitted under separate cover. 2.1.1 SBKR There are 19 subspecies of Merriam's k-rat (Dipodomys merriami), three of which occur in California, including the SBKR. Of the three California subspecies, SBKR are the smallest and darkest. Merriam's kangaroo rats are wide-spread throughout the grid regions of the western United States and northwest Mexico (Hall 1981; Williams et al. 1993a). Only three sites (Santa Ana River, Cajon and Lytle creeks, and San Jacinto and Bautista creeks) support robust, sustaining populations of SBKR and large contiguous patches of occupied habitat. In most heteromyids, soil texture is a primary factor in determining species' distributions (Brown and Harney 1993). SBKR are found primarily on well drained, sandy loam substrates, characteristic of alluvial fan and floodplains. • Wilson Avenue (East) Extension 2 2011 SKBR Survey The historic range of the subspecies San Bernardino kangaroo rat lies west of the desert divide of the San Jacinto and San Bernardino mountains and extends from the San Bernardino Valley in San Bernardino County to the Menifee Valley in Riverside County (Lidicker 1960; Hall 1981). The subspecies currently occupies approximately 1,299 ha (3,247 acres) of suitable habitat in about seven general locations (USFWS 1998), including the Santa Ana River, Cajon Creek Wash, Lytle Creek Wash, City Creek, and upper Etiwanda Wash in San Bernardino County. D. merriami, and all other kangaroo rats, are primarily nocturnal animals, but they also exhibit crepuscular behavior around dusk and dawn. Daly et al. (1992b) found that D. merriami shifted from nocturnal activity during full moon to more crepuscular activity during dawn and dusk periods, suggesting a more complex and fine-grain compensatory behavioral response to moonlight rather than simply reducing overall surface activity to avoid moonlight. The USFWS emergency listed the SBKR on January 27, 1998 and subsequently listed them as federally endangered later that same year on September 24, 1998 (63 FR 3837) under the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (63 FR 3877), as amended. Identified threats to the San Bernardino kangaroo rat include the loss of habitat, habitat fragmentation, urban and industrial development, highway construction, flood control and water conservation projects, sand and gravel mining, grazing, and vandalism (USFWS 1998). 2.1.2 RAFSS RAFSS is a distinct habitat type of the coastal sage scrub community. It is composed of species found in both coastal sage scrub and chaparral communities. Areas where there are historical braided • channels containing soils deposited by alluvial or wind driven processes, typically support both alluvial sage scrub and chaparral vegetation (Smith, 1980). In general, alluvial fans are gently sloping masses of loose rock, gravel and sand deposited by a stream or river as it flows into a valley or upon a floodplain. This is a relatively open vegetation type adapted to periodic disturbances, such as flooding and erosion. RAFSS is composed of an assortment of drought deciduous shrubs and larger evergreen woody shrubs, characteristic of both coastal sage scrub and chaparral communities. Vegetation generally associated with RAFSS is characterized by perennial vegetation consisting of California Buckwheat (Eriogonum faciculatum), Yerba Santa (Eriodictyon trichocalyx), deer weed (Lotus scoparus), California Croton (Croton californicus), scalebroom (Leptospartum squamatum) and Santa Ana River woollystar. RAFSS also has a herbaceous component consisting of several species including introduced brome grasses (Bromus rubens) and (Bromus tectorum), Lupines (Lupinus Bicolor), storksbill (Erodium cicutarium), chia (Salvia columbanae), and dove weed (Eremocarpus setigerus). Three phases of RAFSS have been described; pioneer, intermediate, and mature. The phases are thought to correspond to the factors such as flood scour, distance from flood channel, time since last flood, and substrate features. Normally, floodwaters periodically break out of the main river channel in a complex pattern, resulting in a braided appearance to the floodplain and resulting in a mosaic of vegetation stages. The pioneer stage is the earliest phase is generally sparse as it occurs within active channels and is therefore, subject to frequent hydrological disturbances. The intermediate phase is typically found on higher benches between active channel (pioneer phase) and mature floodplain terraces and is subject to less frequent periodic flooding. The vegetation of both the pioneer and intermediate phases is relatively open. The oldest or mature phase of alluvial sage scrub is rarely affected by flooding and supports the highest plant density. • Wilson Avenue (East) Extension 2011 SKBR Survey • 3 Methods 3.1 SBKR Trapping Survey Prior to conducting the field survey, the CNDDB and literature references were examined to obtain information on SBKR occurrences in the project vicinity. On March 01, 2011 TDA biologist, Shay Lawrey walked the site to visually assess the site conditions within the "SBKR analysis area'. During the site walk over, Ms. Lawrey looked for burrows, tail drags, tracks, and scat indicative of kangaroo rats. Ms. Lawrey has a decade of experience with SBKR and is a biologist permitted (USFWS permit number TE 094308-0) by the USFWS to trap and handle SBKR. Ms. Lawrey conducted the focused live-trapping survey from 03/12/11 through 03/17/11. A total of 100 traps were located with the intention of covering the vast majority of the direct impact area containing suitable SBKR habitat and a sufficient portion of the indirect impact area within the SBKR analysis area. The traps were laid in a line parallel and adjacent to the north and south sides of the Project alignment. The trap lines traversed high quality pioneer RAFSS found to the south of the alignment and low fo moderate quality intermediate RAFSS found along the north of the alignment. The trap lines consisted of 12-inch, Sherman live traps placed 10 meter apart. Traps were baited with rolled oats, and inspected at midnight and again around 4 a.m. the following morning. Once the traps were opened in the evening at dusk, the Doppler radar and cloud cover at the site and in the vicinity was checked at 10 p.m. All animals were identified and released unharmed at the point of capture. Daily notes included weather conditions such as temperature, wind speed, cloud cover, precipitation and moon phase. • 3.2 Jurisdictional Delineation As part of the SBKR survey a routine jurisdictional delineation was also conducted. Areas of potential jurisdiction were evaluated according to the ACOE' 1987 Manual (i.e., Environmental Laboratory, 1987) and CDFG guidelines (A Field Guide to Lake and Streambed Alteration Agreements Sections 1600- 1607 California Fish And Game Code. Environmental Services Division, 994). The fieldwork for the jurisdictional delineation was conducted on 03/14/11. The study area for the jurisdictional delineation was defined as those areas bound by the cut channel banks, where the Project is proposed. The delineation was conducted on foot and aerial maps, landmarks and a global positioning unit were used to assist in determining the proposed road alignment. All areas identified as supporting non-wetland jurisdictional waters were measured to the nearest foot. Permanent impacts were calculated by multiplying the drainage width by the fill length and then converting to acres. Temporary impacts were calculated by multiplying the drainage width by the construction action area and then converting to acres. The drainage channels were evaluated based on the Corps definition for ephemeral, intermittent, and perennial streams. Parameters noted, were amount and type of vegetation (hydrophytic versus upland) present within the drainage, soil moisture, and the presence of running or standing water. 4 Results No limitations or constraints could be identified that could influence the survey results. Surveys were conducted during the appropriate season, in good weather conditions, by qualified biologists who followed all pertinent protocols. Weather conditions were clear and cool with calm winds. Table 1 below shows the tabulated weather data as it relates to this survey. • Wilson Avenue (East) Extension 2011 SKBR Survey • 4.1 SBKR Trapping Survey Table 1. Survey dates, weather conditions, and moon phases Survey %Cloud Wind Overnight Low precipitation in last Moon Dates Cover (BFT) ~ F) p 24hrs Phase 03/12/11 0 1 50 None First quarter 03/13/1103/1 t0 1 51 None First quarter 4/11 25 0 51 None First quarter 03/15/11 20 2 52 None Full 03/16/11 30 1 52 None Full The project area consists of an existing traveled, compacted dirt road with large boulders, cobbles, sand and silt, and RAFSS (Holland community code 32720 habitat in adjacent areas. Intermediate to mature RAFSS occurs in the survey area. RAFSS habitat is a dynamic habitat community dependent upon periodic flooding. The hydrologic forces that the RAFSS habitat within the survey area used to depend on have been dramatically altered and tamed over the years for flood control purposes. The habitat is no longer scoured by periodic flooding. In the past, winter flows would create areas of scour and sedimentation that would cycle the RAFSS habitat community back to earlier successional stages. • Instead the habitat will continue to mature and eventually senesce or type convert. One characteristic of RAFSS is that there is no clear species dominance, rather several species may share co-dominance. This is the case at this site where co-dominants include California buckwheat (Eriogonum fasciculatum), deerweed (Lotus scoparus), yerba santa (Eriodictyon trichocalyx va. trichocalyx), and scale broom (Lepidospartum squamatum). Non-native grasses have invaded and colonized the RAFSS north of the project alignment antl this undoubtedly contributes the low recruitment of native species in this area. Soboba stony and gravelly loamy sand, frequently flooded Psamments and Fluvents, and Tujunga gravelly loamy sand are mapped in the survey area. Observations of wildlife included scat, tracks, burrows, nest, calls, and individual animals. The reptile and amphibian species observed include the western fence lizard, western toad and gopher snake. The most common wildlife noted include individuals or sign of stripped skunk, raccoon, and coyote. The most common bird species observed were red tail hawk, American kestrel, mourning dove, black phoebe, and common raven. Sign of various small mammals were observed within the areas of the trap lines and five (5) native rodent species were trapped. No animals were marked as part of this survey so determining unique individuals versus recaptured individuals was not possible. The term "trap night" is used to relay how many individuals, per species were caught over the 5-night session. Each trap is counted as a trap night, so with 100 traps surveyed over five nights there was-a total of 500 trap nights. Taking all five (5) species caught into account, the overall trapping success of the survey ranged from 32 to 54 percent, with 32 to 54 animals being captured on any given survey night. The fourth and fifth survey nights had the highest trapping success with 54 individuals being caught each night; whereas, the first survey night had the lowest trapping success. Thirty two animals were trapped on night one. Several pacific kangaroo rats were caught within the south survey transect. No pacific kangaroo rats were trapped in • ~ISOn Avenue (East) Extension 2011 SKBR Survey • the north. No SBKR were captured. Table 2. Rodent species Captured (Phylogenetic listing per Jameson & Peters, California Mammals, 1988) Species Total Trap Ni hts San Diego pocket mouse (Chaetodipus fallax 51 fallax) pacific kangaroo rat (Dipodomys agilus) 35 wood rat (Neotoma lepida) 18 cactus mouse (Peromyscus eremicus) 43 deer mouse (Peromyscus maniculatus) 110 As in 2006, no SBKR were trapped over the course of the 5-night survey and according to the CNDDB (January 2011 update), the nearest known location of SBKR is approximately 0.75 mile southeast of the project area. Given the absence of SBKR within the analysis area, there is no risk of taking individuals of this species in conjunction with implementing the proposed project. Although, the project will not result in the loss of a federally listed species, it will result in the modification of critical habitat. Therefore, consultation with the USFWS will be required to address impacts to SBKR critical habitat. Please note, that the areas within the project site that contain bare compacted ground (existing traveled dirt road), concrete or non-native ruderal vegetation have no potential to support SBKR and therefore, the City does not propose to mitigate impacts to those specific areas. • Calculated impacts to suitable, yet unoccupied SBKR critical habitat are as follows: • Total impacts = 4 acres • 2.50 acres of temporary impacts to be mitigated at a 1:1 ratio via on-site, post construction, restoration. 1.50 acres of permanent impacts to be mitigated at a 2:1 ratio via off-site purchase of 3 acres from an approved mitigation bank. 4.2 Jurisdictional Delineation The proposed alignment crosses over two unnamed, dry, soft bottom stream courses and one concrete lined channel (Etiwanda Creek Channel). Calculated impacts to jurisdictional waters • 0.22 acre total impacts • 0.15 acre of temporary impact to be mitigated at a 1:1 ratio • 0.07 acre of ermanent impact to be mitigated at a 2:1 ratio • ~ lrlson Avenue (East) Extension 2077 SKBR Survey • 0.15 + 0.14 = 0.29 acres of jurisdictional waters to be mitigated via SAWA or the Inland Empire Resource Conservation District. 5 Conclusions The trapping results show that SBKR do not currently occupy this area of the Etiwanda fan. No SBKR were trapped over the course of the 5-night trapping survey and according to the CNDDB (March 2011 update), the nearest known location of SBKR is 0.75 miles southeast of the project area. Given the absence of SBKR within the analysis area, there is no risk of taking individuals of this species in conjunction with implementing the proposed project. Although the project will not likely result in the loss of a federally listed species it will may affect critical habitat. Therefore, consultation with the USFWS will be required. 6 Applicable Regulations 6.1 Clean Water Act (CWA) The CWA is the principal federal law that governs pollution in the nation's lakes, rivers, and coastal waters. Originally enacted in 1972 as a series of amendments to the Federal Water Pollution Control Act of 1948 the Act was last amended in 1987. The overriding purpose of the CWA is to "restore and maintain the chemical, physical and biological integrity of the nation's waters." The statute employs a variety of regulatory and non-regulatory tools to eliminate the discharge of pollutants into the nation's • waters and achieve water quality that is both "swimmable and fishable". Section 303 of CWA requires that states establish ambient water quality standards for water bodies, consisting of the beneficial use or uses of a water body (e.g. recreation, public water supply, etc.), and the water quality criteria necessary to protect the use or uses. Section 303(d) requires states to identify waters that are impaired by pollution, even after application of pollution controls. 6.1.1 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers The Corps regulates discharges of dredged or fill material into waters of the United States. Waters of the United States include wetlands and non-wetland bodies of water that meet specific criteria. The Corps' regulatory jurisdiction pursuant to Section 404 of the Federal CWA is founded on a connection, or nexus, between the water body in question and interstate commerce. This connection may be direct through a tributary system linking a stream channel with traditional navigable waters used in interstate or foreign commerce, or may be indirect, through a nexus identified in the Corps regulations. One of the mechanisms adopted by Congress to achieve restoration and maintenance of the chemical, physical, and biological integrity of the Nation's waters is a prohibition on the discharge of any pollutants, including dredged or fill material, into "navigable waters' except in compliance with other specified sections of the Act. 6.2 Porter-Cologne Water Quality Control Act Porter-Cologne Water Quality Control Act is the principal state law that governs water protection efforts in Califomia. Enacted in 1969, sections of the state law served as the basis for the federal Clean Water Act of 1972. Porter-Cologne establishes the State Water Resources Control Board and each of the nine Regional Water Quality Control Boards as the principal state agencies for coordinating and controlling water quality in Califomia. The Regional Boards issue CWA NPDES permits (see below) to selected • point-source discharges and either waste discharge requirements or conditional water quality Wilson Avenue (East) Extension 7 2011 SKBR Survey • certifications for other discharges. 6.2.1 Regional Water Quality Control Board The RWQCB's regulatory jurisdiction is pursuant to Section 401 of the Federal CWA. The RWQCB typically regulates discharges of dredged or fill material into Waters of the United States, however they also have regulatory authority over waste discharges into Waters of the State, which may be isolated, under the Porter-Cologrie Water Quality Control Act issued by the State Water Resources Board. In the absence of a nexus with the Corps, the Regional Board requires the submittal of a Waste Discharge Requirement (WDR) application, which must include a copy of the project Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SW PPP) and a copy of the project Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), otherwise called a Standard Urban Stormwater Management Plan (SUSMP). The Regional Board's role is to ensure that disturbances in the stream channel do not cause water quality degradation. 6.3 California Fish and Game Code Sections 1600 to 1616 of the California Fish and Game Code require any person, state, or local government agency or public utility to notify the California Department of Fish and Game (CDFG) before beginning any activity that will substantially modify a river, stream, or lake. If it is determined that the activity could substantially adversely impact an existing fish and wildlife resource, a Lake or Streambed Alteration Agreement is required. 6.3.1 California Department of Fish and Game Unlike the Corps, CDFG regulates not only the discharge of dredged or fill material, but all activities that • alter streams and lakes and their associated habitats. The CDFG, through provisions of the California Fish and Game Code (Sections 1601-1603), is empowered to issue agreements for any alteration of a river, stream, or lake where fish or wildlife resources may be adversely affected. Streams (and rivers) are defined by the presence of a channel bed and banks, and at least an intermittent flow of water. The CDFG typically extends the limits of their jurisdiction laterally beyond the channel banks for streams that support riparian vegetation. In these situations the outer edge of the riparian vegetation is generally used as the lateral extent of the stream and CDFG jurisdiction. CDFG regulates wetland areas only to the extent that those wetlands are a part of a river, stream, or lake as defined by CDFG. The CDFG administers the California Endangered Species Act (CESA). The State of California considers an.endangered species one whose prospects of survival and reproduction are in immediate jeopardy. A threatened species is one present in such small numbers throughout its range that it is likely to become an endangered species in the near future in the absence of special protection or management and a rare species is one present in such small numbers throughout its range that it may become endangered if its present environment worsens. Rare species applies to California native plants. The State definition of "take" is narrow and specifically refers to the direct loss of a State listed species. Provisions within the California Fish and Game Code protect all native birds of prey and their nests (FGC §3503.5), and all non-game birds (other than those not listed as Fully Protected) that occur naturally in the State (§3800). The handful of species, such as the California condor, that are designated by the State as "fully protected" received this rare designation through special legislation. There is no mechanism allowed for CDFG to issue take authorization for a fully protected species. Species of Special Concern is an informal designation used by CDFG for some declining wildlife species that are not proposed for listing as threatened or endangered, such as the burrowing owl. This designation does not provide legal protection, but signifies that these species are recognized as • Wilson Avenue (East) Extension 8 2011 SKBR Survey ,. • sensitive by CDFG. 6.4 Federal Endangered Species Act Special status species are native species that have been afforded special legal protection because of concern for their continued existence. The ESA provides a legal mechanism for listing species as either threatened or endangered, and a process of protection for those species listed. Section 9 of the ESA prohibits "take" of threatened or endangered species. The term "take" under federal law means to harass, harm, pursue, hunt, shoot, wound, kill, trap, capture, or collect, or to attempt to engage in such conduct. "Take" can include adverse modification of habitats used by a threatened or endangered species during any portion of its life history. The Act requires Federal agencies to insure that activities they authorize, fund, or carry out are not likely to jeopardize the continued existence of any listed species, or destroy or adversely modify its critical habitat, if any is designated. 6.4.1 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) administers the federal Endangered Species Act (ESA) of 1973. Under the regulations of the ESA, the USFWS may authorize "take" when it is incidental to, but not the purpose of, an otherwise lawful act. Take authorization can be obtained under Section 7 or Section 10 of the Act. Activities requiring Federal involvement that may affect an endangered species on federal or private land must be reviewed by the USFWS who will determine whether or not the continued existence of the listed species is jeopardized. The USFWS, in coordination with the CDFG, State Fish and Game Code §3503.5 and §3800, • administers the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA), which provides protection for nesting birds that are both residents and migrants, whether or not they are considered sensitive by resource agencies. The MBTA prohibits take of nearly all native birds. "Take" in this law has been construed by the courts much more narrowly than under the enacted ESA. Under the MBTA, "take" means only to kill, harm, or destroy individuals or eggs, or cause failure of a nesting effort. Permits are available through USFWS, but are generally only given for emergency repairs where potential loss of human life or safety is regulations are applied selectively by public agencies as a practical matter, as it would be impossible to pursue every action threatening any bird or nest. The most common situations in which MBTA is applied are: (1) as an additional regulatory requirement in projects which hold the potential for substantial environmental degradation; (2) as an additional tool when prosecuting willful violation of other biological resource regulations such as the ESA or hunting regulations; (3) to provide protection of colonially nesting species, such as herons, terns, and swallows; and (4) to provide protection of nesting birds of prey. • Wilson Avenue (East) Extension 2011 SKBR Survey 7 Literature Cited California Department of Fish and Game (CDFG), 2011. RareFind 3 Version 3.1.0, California Natural Diversity Data Base, California. Accessed on March 01, 2011. California Native Plant Society (GNPs), 2010. Inventory of Rare and Endangered Plants of California. Rare Plant Scientific Advisory Committee, David P. Tibor, Convening Editor. California Native Plant Society. Sacramento, California. Available at: http://www.cnps.org/inventory. Accessed on March 01, 2011 California Department of Conservation, California Geological Survey website, www.consrv.ca.cov. Cowardin, L. M., V. Carter, and E. T. LaRoe, 1979. Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States. Offce of Biological Services, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, District of Columbia. Environmental Laboratory, 1987. Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual. Technical Report Y-87-1. U.S. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station. Vicksburg, Mississippi. Franzreb, K. E. 1989. Ecology and conservation of the endangered Least Bell's Vireo. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Serv. Biol. Rep. 89(1). Hickman, J. C., ed. 1993. The Jepson Manual: Higher Plants of California. Univ. of Calif. Pr., Berkeley, CA. Holland, R. F. 1986. Preliminary descriptions of the Terrestrial Natural Communities of California. Calif.Dept. of • Fish and Game, Sacramento, CA. McKernan, R.L. 1997. The status and known distribution of the San Bernardino Kangaroo rat (Dipodomys merriami parvus): field surveys conducted between 1987 and 1996. Unpublished report prepared for the Carlsbad Fish and Wildlife Office, Carlsbad, California. Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS), 2011. Web Soil Survey. Map Unit Descriptions. San Bernardino County Area, California. Available at: http://websoilsurvey.nres.usda.govlapp/HomePage.htm. Accessed on March 01, 2011. Munz, P.A. 1974. A Flora of Southern California. University. of California Press, Berkeley, California. U.S. Department of Agriculture. 1971. Soil Survey of Western San Bernardino Area, California. Soil Conservation Service, Washington, D.C. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 1998. Determination of Endangered Status for the San Bernardino Kangaroo Rat Dipodomys merriami parvus). 63 FR 3837. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 2002. Final Determination of Critical Habitat for the San Bernardino Kangaroo Rat (Dipodomys merriami parvus); Final Rule. 67 FR 19812 • Wilson Avenue (East) Extension 10 2011 SKBR Survey Figures • Wilson Avenue (Eas(~ Extension 2017 SKBR Survey i• i• Figure 1. Regional Location Map ;' J I - ~' t ~r ''~~ I. =' _ 58 ~ ^ - ,rdir n, e~ps:SupPIY r ~,) ii / -- Aluinf Co7pi3upply Lf Mfr ~ J r: 9.- J/ ( edddlit•Jtlt O'JIt6 <U:e-Paar ( j ~ \ l ~~ 1 \ %/ I ~` / / •~ ~ v ~ .6i r f Air Fiuma/ - Pz~ 1 - 18 ~ I . -- - - ~ ~ is _ ! i J _.__. ~.. USS11 OI~YFVn I ~• J • arfrl~Flanlat pn ~ ~ , dal' ~6~~ ~ ~•~ ~ - -- •~ i jec ton.Lu t. ~ ~ i t ^ 1 Sqn ~a6liel- ~ ^ Wldfr aP~e Antonio ~ ~i;- J \ -._-," { S., j -~ _ . \ •-~ z _: ',. ._ it ~ ~" ~' I ~S'an{•Imu~ ~ _ _ _.. ~ REGIONAL LOCATION aI ~fu~:airoiiF ;,:. ke, elvstiin i ! + - ~ ~ ~;' R~i1FneI+U lJ~ore.~. 1 on Va ^e; -~-" 8e« ,e nro ~ , 1 ~'~ ~ - ---- -- ~ ~ ~ - ~ ~•4 ~ Sar;lf*inufi Indian .,-' rlriSn Pr+a ~ • l.[•s an p.lca £lale ~ Loyntr Aib n{um ~' r n \ ^' \:. •, ~ enervation ' "- S ~ ~" ,He rt B;~ , F _ Y~- a=t~nie ~' ~ 5.111 ~ ~ 8@Iliall [11110 ~•"-~.. I 19 ,,t 'r_Stat= Rec sTtin ~ _ i , ' fl~ton Air Forw Ba» V San Garu nio ' I r ~ sL0 rAnCJ2l6 11Vn1t~ie~t1 p~~Pam E' ~ / 1 _ a ^ 4ao tnn t ~, htanr e.Corpr,~~Rrexr're.Center l ' " ' '~ P~ONA~` '~- ~•/ - ~ - ' - -- - - - - I . CA ~ Ai I I ~ atro9' ~ ' _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _1. t ~ • ~ ~. ~ ./ '1 r J p _ :~f\pJ@IS{110 '.J i ~ ~ ' J • ~ i 9o Ind 3n ~ xr tts,^~ } r '~~ _ _ _ - _ / ~ k ~dra :{ate 11 i , 1 I ^ : ~ J / I ~ ~t•J R ton eserv _ rF;M `L+= f ( " o ~/ I (f rn i; cnwr - I ' `M ~II ~ •[~ _ ` ~,~ S bobs Ind an--_~ ~~\ ese niatiDn f ? t Santiago ~' ~" f ~ f ~ r ~ Cahu _ '~~ ~/ jtfse - _ - P fi Jndi n " • ~• 1 anpa a Jte{enition erM State ..^' _ .. _ _ ~_--~~`-,_ . " -.' . _ _ _ `' Indian ' i -mil . rvf c~~...n~i'~~ _` Re x • Wilson Avenue (East) Extension 2011 SKBR Survey • • • Figure 2. Vicinity Location ~~~ ~~ , ~` . ~" ^~' ~ '~''"'. ~ ' ~ Tom'--~~.c" ' ,, ~ ... '- w w., : ~ r y NnuMain Ant nip ~ y~+1T~',~',~ 1 '~ ~` i,V( ~L ~ ~ . .. ` . ,,{,+ . P~~9.s>R l .~~~^, ' r. " ~ ~'~ '• 1 1~ t~ ~. 4 ~~.;.-' ~r, ''1 ~ Project \ ..,.~` ~ '" 1 ~ ~r i 1 '~ %~/`rte"` , ~l .i5 l~ l _ ~ 1 yam. ~ ~ ..{~ .y~~-m17 /.~ Wilson Avenue (East) Extension 201? SKBR Survey • Figure 3. Topographical View of Project Site Location • • i ~ -- ~ .~ -- ,, II; ~ ~,. _ / fir. ? J ~.._ /;:Iy,UO / ~~~` ,/I(ti i _ \ 'r, ~ :: /~ ~~'` /~ •~,~- f '``~y'~/~/ ~~ it Sb6~ ~-~! -~ r ~ ' SItO 5~*' ~ .. i ~"ti/ ~~ ~r.~F~ M; s _~ ~." "~ 1r.". 4 j water _.. .. ~i f ~~'' 4^i ~` /~ Tank _ .t52~ - I ~~ /' , ~- f 1 Yom. ~....- ~-- ~ ~ ~'" • ~~ ~ == 5..t1u;TaY111 _ .,f ~ _~~ -_._6 ~.. P S j '~ ~27 ~ - .. ~~ ord. r' Jf -;G: .; __ . ~ ~ - `~ ~ ~ _ - _ ~ h .a I1 ~._..- ~,`~;~ "/y Jam, P _, _ ~ ~ . 17~ ~ / -__- " - QI ~~,..~. a =_~??_- ~30~ \.~- ~\3i 3 ...~-t . r. I. ~ y ~^-- '' lMlson Avenue (East) Extension 2011 SKBR Survey • •~ • a y c W ~.. ~ m ~ ~~ N ~ Qx ~~ H ~ N • • • 0 N c a~ W ~~ m a ~~ 4~i ~ ,Q m h N • • m ,~ U i C ~' ' ~ ` . _ , W ~ 4- t0 ~ r'. , ' d i ~ i Q i { -' a. ~ . L O ~ ~ ~ ~~' _ ,~ C • ~,{ -- + ~ ` ~~ j ^ `~ N _ ` ~ , ~ ~ .. ; ' _ ... ~ `~ t= 1 , ~ ~ i I ' ~ - ' . . ~I I i i f ~ Y Y Y Y 4 Q x a 3 t _ ~ u ' ~ ; _ 5> ~ ~ a~ ~ Y ~ ~ d ~ O G Ql W • w ~ N 7 ~ VJ QI QY ~~ ~o N • • ~o N c 0 .~ C xN W LU ~ N ~ C ~ N QY ~~ Site Photos • Wilson Avenue (East) Extension 2011 SKBR Survey • L ~ ~ ., k,~i& ~ ~ ~~ J i ~ r{~" 1 ~+ '.~ 4 t t{ ~ ~ ~ ` r, "; rr ~e , k,~ , t,~ k , „ ~ a~tr , ~ . ;, p t 't , ti's ~ s ~ , i~, ~~~~i4 3 t w• t t d.~ f it ~~ t i k c t i ~, t " ~ - ~. _,~ Photo 1. View of survey area on south side of the Wilson Witson Avenue (East) Extension 2011 SKBR Survey .. .. -': .x .. jrainage. c.-- .:~-- ,-. -- µ~~'' ; r> ~yL..'I:'r ' l''..'~•~.r~: ~~. r r .~ ~yy 'r n :,[soda -~~~1=;~ Photo 3 View of unaffected soft bottom channel outside and to the north of the alignment • -t' ' . ~ . c I ~a C4.,rm I Is ~~ s~~l f~cq G-~~ _ 1 ~ I ~ t rmnta ~ '~' ~ l ° i~~f tre ~~et rw o nca / 111111 res ~ i< : ~t Fe ch ~ a 5~ ~f f . ._ x .. . +.,t, .. F. F yz.. ,,1, .. .... _...,..i!~ Photo 4. View demonstrating work limits outside ofjurisdictional area • Wilson Avenue (East) Extension 2011 SKBR Survey • Wilson Avenue (East) Extension 2011 SKBR Survey Floral Compendium • Wilson Avenue (Easlf Extension 2011 SKBR Survey u Species Code Family Scientific Name Yucsch Agavaceae Yucca schidigera Yucwhi Agavaceae Yucca whipplei Amb sp Asteraceae Ambrosia sp Artcal Asteraceae Artemisia californica Cenmel Asteraceae Centaurea melitensis GnacaB Asteraceae Gnaphalium canescens ssp. beneolens Gutcal Asteraceae Gutierrezia californica Lepsqu Asteraceae Lepidospartum squamatum, Stedie Asteraceae Stephanomeria diegensis Stygna Asteraceae Stylocline gnaphaliodies Xanstr Asteraceae Xanthium strumarium Cry sp1 Boraginaceae Cryptantha sp.1 Cry sp2 Boraginaceae Cryptantha sp.2 Hirinc Brassicaceae Hirschfeldia incana Opulii Cactaceae Opuntia littoralis Slstra Chenopodiaceae Sa/so/a tragus Lotsco Fabaceae Lotus scoparius Paracu Fabaceae Parkinsonia aculeata Erdcic Geraniaceae Erodium cicutarium Erdmos Geraniaceae Erodium moschatum Edytri Hydrophyllaceae Eriodictyon trichocalyx Phacic Hydrophyllaceae Phacelia cicutaria var. hispida Phatan Hydrophyllaceae Phacelia tanacetifolia Salapi Lamiaceae Salvia apiana Salcol Lamiaceae Salvia columbariae Epican Onagraceae Epilobium canum Avefat Poaceae Avena fatua Brodia Poaceae Bromus diandrus Bromad Poaceae Bromus madritensis Brotec Poaceae Bromus tectorum Lamaur Poaceae Lamarckia aurea Schbar Poaceae Schismus barbatus Gil sp Polemoniaceae Gilia sp Navham Polemoniaceae Navarretia hamata Cho sp Polygonaceae Chorizanthe sp Erofas Polygonaceae Eriogonum fasciculatum Erogra Polygonaceae Eriogonum gracile Ceacra Rhamnaceae Ceanothus crassifolius Adefas Rosaceae Adenostema fasciculatum • ~ lMlson Avenue (East) Extension 2011 SKBR Survey Appendix G Focused Coastal California Gnatcatcher Survey ~,. • Focused Coastal California Gnatcatcher (Polioptila californica californica) for Wilson Avenue Extension Prepared for: AEI-CASC Engineering 937 S. Via Lata, Suite 500 Colton, CA 92324 • Prepared by: Lisa M. Tollstrup Tom Dodson & Associates 2150 North Arrowhead Avenue San Bernardino, California 92405 June 2011 CertltlCatlon: I hereby certify that the statements furnished herein and in the attached exhibits present data and information required for this Biological Survey to [he best of my ability, and the facts, statements and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. ...."_ f. _~. .. ---- ~" ,_-- _ ~. .-,~ • Lisa M. Tollstrup Wilson Avenue Extension • TABLE OF CONTENTS Focused Coastal California Gnatcatcher Survey Page INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY OF FINDINGS ......................................................1 SITE DESCRIPTION 4 METHODOLOGY 4 Background Information for Coastal California Gnatcatcher 5 RESULTS g Coastal California Gnatcatcher g • CONCLUSIONS g REFERENCES g APPENDICES Appendix A -Data Sheets Appendix B -Site Photographs LIST OF FIGURES, TABLE, AND PHOTOGRAPHS Figure 1 Regional Location Map ..............................................................................2 Figure 2 Site Location Map 3 Table 1 Survey Data Summary 5 • u Wilson Avenue Extension INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY OF FINDINGS Focused Coastal California Gnatcatcher Survey Tam Dodson & Associates (TDA) was contracted by AEI-CASC Engineering, Inc. (AEI-CASC) to conduct a focused Coastal California Gnatcatcher (Polioptila californica californica) (CAGN) survey for the Wilson Avenue Extension (East) Project (Project). The project will extend along Wilson Avenue from Wardman-Bullock Avenue west to East Avenue. The project site is located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County, California and is mapped on the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) -Cucamonga Peak Quadrangle, 7.5 Minute Series, Township 1 North, Range 6 West, Sections 19 and 30. The purpose of this report is to assess the presence of the federally listed threatened coastal California Gnatcatcher (Polioptila californica californica) (CAGN) on the parcel. See Figures 1 and 2 The CAGN was listed as Threatened in 1992 and is protected under provisions of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (Act). The decision to list this species was made based upon the cumulative historic loss of habitat, the further development of pressures facing the existing habitat areas, and the reduction in historic range from throughout cis-montane southern California to southwestern Riverside and San Diego counties The result of this survey is that no CAGN were observed during this survey. • .~ 0 w .~ U a~i - > R w ~ N (n R ~ O y U r y d N U bn 'r^. V i.! ~J U ~ o_ N C w K O _J ~ ~ 0 ~ W a7 d a' C O N i ~ ~ LL ~J .~ L O .~ U m Y N N c4 ~ O U .~'c a ,~ d ~ N U 3 ~ C7 Q R ~ y O L C +O' N W 3 Q N O L ai U ro ~ ~ ~ U T A N Y ti ~ ~ Q ~{ ~ Q U 0 N Q z 0 O O O H Q c z U N N W Q Wilson Avenue Extension ~ITE DESCRIPTION Focused Coastal California Gnatcatcher Survey The proposed project is located on the Etiwanda Creek alluvial fan. Sandy dry wash tributaries to and of the Etiwanda Debris Basin occur within and/or adjacent to the Project alignment. Elevation within the project area is approximately 1,820 above mean sea level. The terrain of the project area consists of a boulder-littered floodplain, sloping downward at approximately 1.5 percent from the northeast to the southwest. The project area is surrounded by rugged foothill topography and alluvial fan. The local area climate is semi-arid, with an average annual temperature of 67°F and a range from 31-103°F. The rainy season begins in November and continues through March, with the quantity and frequency of rain varying from year to year. The average annual rainfall is approximately 18.1 inches. The general vicinity of the project area consists of open space, vacant land, and suburban residential development. The surrounding land uses are a combination of residential, open space, utility easements, and government uses. This site is topographically flat with some artificially created berms and levees. Some areas appear to have been graded. The site consists of an existing dirt road, valley and foothill grasslands, bouldery- sandy river wash and Riversidean alluvial fan sage scrub (RAFSS) habitat. RAFSS is composed of an assortment of deciduous shrubs and larger evergreen woody shrubs such as Yerba Santa (Eriodictyon trichocalyx), California sagebrush (Artemisia Californica), buckwheat (Eriogonum fasciculatum) , scalebroom (Lepidospartum squamatum), golden currant (Ribes aureum), California croton (Croton californica), deer weed (Lotus scoparus), and white sage (Salvia apiana). • METHODOLOGY Approximately 65% of the land adjacent to the Project alignment is comprised of RAFSS which provides habitat for a myriad of regionally sensitive flora and fauna, unique to this region. Listed species identified to have a potential to occur within the vicinity of the project area include: the San Bernardino kangaroo rat (SBKR) [Dipodomys mariami parvus] and Coastal California gnatcatcher (CAGN) [Polioptila californica californica]. The project is not mapped within CAGN critical habitat; however, there is suitable habitat within and adjacent to the project site. The CAGN focused survey protocol requires 6 weekly (or greater) visits during the breeding season or 9 bi-weekly (or greater) visits during the non-breeding season. Prior to conducting the field survey, the California Natural Diversity Data Base (CNDDB) and literature references were examined to obtain information on CAGN occurrences in the project vicinity. A 10-day notice was sent to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service advising them of the intent to conduct CAGN surveys on the project Field surveys were conducted by Lisa Tollstrup (#TE-832945-4), beginning on March 28, 2011 and extending until May 9, 2011. Each survey was conducted by walking the site and visually and audibly identifying birds within the coastal sage scrub vegetation community. Bird species observed were recorded during each visit. Data Sheets attached as Appendix A. • AE1122°it CAGN WilsonAve TOM DODSON $ ASSOCIATES Wilson Avenue Extension :able 1 is a summary of the survey visits. Table 1 Survey Data Summary Focused Coastal California Gnatcatcher Survey Date Survey Time Temperature(DF) R lt CAGN Start End Start End esu s 03/28/11 0700 0930 58 58 None Detected 04/04/11 0945 1130 65 71 None Detected 04/11/11 0900 1100 66 68 ~ None Detected 04/25/11 0915 1120 60 66 None Detected 05!03/11 0630 0755 58 63 None Detected 05/10/11 1045 1210 64 65.5 None Detected Background Information for Polioptila californica californica (CAGN) This bird species is aFederally-listed Threatened Species that occurs in Coastal Sage Scrub (CSS) in Southern California. The CAGN are year-round residents of the CSS vegetative community in Southern California. As late as the mid-1940s the CAGN was considered locally common, and by the ~id-1960s a noticeable decline had begun. The CAGN was listed as Threatened in 1992. .s reeding pairs become highly territorial by late February or early March. The CAGN is a small thrush- like songbird approximately 4 to 5 inches in length with dark, blue-gray plumage above and gray-white plumage below. Nest building begins during the second or third week of March. RESULTS Observations of wildlife included scat, tracks, burrows, nest, calls, and individual animals. The reptile and amphibian species observed include the western fence lizard, western toad and gopher snake. The most common mammal species detected include individuals or sign of cotton-tail rabbit, and coyote. The most common bird species observed were white-crown sparrow, house finch, brown tohee, mourning dove, and common raven. Coastal California Gnatcatcher The result of this survey is that no CAGN were observed during this survey. According to the "Final Critical Habitat mapping Unit # 12" for San Bernardino County, this site is not located within designated- critical habitat for the CAGN. • AE1tz 2ott CAGN Wuson nve. TOM DODSON $r ASSOCIATES Wilson Avenue Extension ~.+ONCLUSION Focused Coastal California Gnatcatcher Survey The result of this survey is that no CAGN were observed during this survey. Further, the site is not within designated critical habitat which has been established by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service as part of their recovery efforts for this species. u • AE112 2011 CAGN Wilson Ave TOM DODSON & ASSOCIATES Wilson Avenue Extension Focused Coastal California Gnatcatcher Survey • REFERENCES Arnett, Ross H. and Richard L. Jacques. 1981. Simon and Schuster's Guide to Insects. New York: Simon and Schuster. Inc. Borror, Donald J. and Richard E. White. 1970. A Field Guide to Insects: America North of Mexico. New York: Houghton Mifflin Company. California Department of Fish and Game. 1994. Natural Diversity Data Base. Garth, John S. and J.W. Tilden. 1986. California Butterflies. University of California Press. Berkeley, California and London, England. Hickman, J.C. Ed. 1993. The Jepson Manual: Higher Plants of California. Berkeley and Los Angeles, University of California Press. Hogue, Charles L. 1993. Insects of the Los Angeles Basin. Los Angeles: Natural History Museum Foundation. Holland, R.F. 1986. Preliminary Descriptions fo the Terrestrial Natural Communities • of California. California Resources Agency, Department of Fish and Game. Munz, P.A. Flora of Southern California. National Geographic Society. 1987. Field Guide to Birds of North America, 2nd Edition. National Geographic Society, Washington D.C. Peterson, Roger Tory. 1990. A Field Guide to Western Birds. Boston: Houghton Mifflin. Powell, Jerry A. and Charles L. Hogue. 1979. California Insects. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press. Sawyer, John O. and Todd Keeler-Wolf. 1995. A Manual of Califomia Vegetation. Sacramento: California Native Plant Society. Stebbins, Robert C. 1985. A Field Guide to Western Reptiles and Amphibians. Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston, Massachusetts. Stokes, Donald and Lillian. 1996. Stokes Field Guide to Birds: Western Region. Boston and New York: Little, Brown and Company. AE1122011 CAGN Wilson Ave TOM DODSON $ ASSOCIATES Wilson Avenue Extension Focused Coastal California Gnatcatcher Survey • APPENDIX A DATA SHEETS AE7122011 CAGN WiISOn AVe TOM DODSON $ ASSOCIATES Wilson Avenue Extension • _I • •r _' .~ U y' Y ~ Jj A ;~ J y ~- .~. ,.a 4')..:y N W Q W l.I C) O W '^ O N W ~ z fw'} ~ N D W a o ~~ O W W U Cl O w N LL ~n O N e1 Z M O ni O ~ ~ o ~ m i c 7 a G z O } z v~ Y I ' J ( z <; ~ c n ~ Q ~~ iry ~ w CO C U1 Z ~', l4I W ~ J Y X fl. W W ~ }} ~ ? ~ ? ~',, - ¢ ~ -~ ~ I z O i O ~ ~ (~i a I~~ry U SJ ~ ~O w H ~ v) c~% >- u . ~ >- W y ui W F v c O 4 , ~ c v. v; a a H E= ~~ Z ,L'J ~~ l9 W I~ 0 rz IJ 1 iS'~ v m _ ~_'. ci W c5 ; s I ~.~. O W Q ~ ~ ~ a z z ~ ~ O W .7 m c "' z ,Fr, W w ~ _t ~ X C w 4 ~ ~ ~ N r ~ ~ J +` L O to ~ ?~, is ~ v u g o a 5 4 m ~ Z V } ~ } `J w W l z O ~ ~ z F O V) d N Ul C t~ 4 W S c N 1~~ 0 z w i~ ~~ 1^~ z_ f.7 m t z w r_~ ~r Z v m i. iN 1 f~ Q a. b \j 2 w O u 0 O ~~ F r C G ~_ ?~ ~~ w, O 3+ (j_ r1j O u qq _n + } _ 1 ~l U ~3~r5~i Focused Coastal California A ~; ~ `,. 3 ~ '~ U ~~ tJ J i:? ,~7 r1 ~F1 -._ :J~ vi ..1 ~ ~ : ~ Cc p -- j ~= ~`~ ~~ z . (~ : il r~ ~- CSC v icy ~ ~ I^ a ~ ... ~ -. .. t u J rL sY ~. n ~n rij ~- j X11 ~~ J 1~ -z -~ ip '.'~ "C. i ~- d =3 -~ ~ z" '~ ~ ~ y J` IY y ~~ ~~ `'v.-. ` r fy T. Z 't Y K VC t1) u ~ !~ . ~ }' n 1 ~n ~ ~ 1 ~~• ~ 3 3 •~ 1 ~ •1^ ~} J ~ .T .C ~1 ~ ~ ~ ' ( Z iy LS ~ •rl :~ ~_ ::~- i~: F~~ ~ L1 V 2 u ~. `~ y I% pa ! 2 Y~ 13 -t w ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ' .~ t~ ..~ E- `w ~ ~ 2, 1 c h ~ tti .,a ~ n ~,; ` '.+ iu d ~ ~~ s iP i- 7 {'^ SL (, u ,n 1 ,~ r. ~ d d ~- v ~ ~u i:n .~ N n ~ 1 =~ r =~- ~~ Z ~ .{ ~ 4 `~L _ ~ i ~, ~ r c; <Y - tL ` I` __ Z a _ _ d U .._-_ -.___-._-..___--_ .._____J AE 1722oN CAGN Wilson Ave TOM DODSON ~ ASSOCIATES Wilson Avenue Extension • Focused Coastal California Gnatcatcher Survey I I ~j "~ i fl z r ~ ~ ° a Q w z C "~`~u~ O~ u'ns p ~ m a z ~ .. z v i nii~ N ~ "' ti "' O r~ Z M ~ ~ w u Q Noa } Z ~ z j _ ~n ~ IQ ~ i .:.. g O ~ O C7 h ~' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O '-~-' O ti ~ U 'V I S r ~ V w u_ ui w • ~ ~ 4 ~ C ~ ~ ~-- C~ v~ ut -~.; ~~ ~ :q v, E;~ ~; ~ ~~ q ~~ { Y ~~ .~' Yl ~ l_ ~: w a `~I `~I ~ ~ ~. u i o, ~. ~ 1 .;, J ti. n Z j u m r^ = ~ ~` _.l' S .~ ~ G iC i >~ a L. Z ^ ~l ~ t~ 5 ~~ V p Z \t}I C ~-~ ~ -~ 2 N w ~ ;n ti ly 1 '•.i iii ~ ~ iu o -= } T r.+ ~~ r 7 ~ ~ ' ,A ~~ ~ ~ ~ v l: 1u ~-~ •_ i i ~ r cii l~ ~ ~ v ~ ~ ~ lk1 ~'~ t1 W ~ T Y ~:~i ~ ~]~ ~1 :~ ~~" Cl . ci. d~f ~ (, ~ ,,,5 ~. '•S .... ~._ C'~ ti >..i I I ~ Q ,h i i O Vf ~ J z I e o ~ ° a ~ z o Q N a ~ ~!cmC `~ ~ ~ Z ~ .' Z M w - ~( w` '^ w 0 N J K y, ~ D ~ ~ Z u ~ Q O o .. 4 ~ '' ~ °Y 2 O O .cr' z ~ U w O • Y ~ U i7 'r Z I j > u _ >- ~ w u ~ _ d` ~ Q d' ~ ~ ~ V ~ 2 {A to ti ;SS a w ~ _ " ti. ~ ° 4 ~t ~ ~ a ~~ ~. S G (a ~ I ~ ~ w n d i ~ I Z lj'y I QI ~ ~'~ '~ ' ~ <- p w ~1: i Y, J- ' ~- ,, .1 ' .L ~. ,L ~ 4i c = ~ t F~ u ~ ~ ~ ~ F ~ ~ G. li ~ ~'i ~ F7 ~ ~:3 ti ~~ c '3 ~' -~ ~'J i D ~ .~ ~ ~~ 1 ~, y^~ ~~ "t ~ z O o ct'} £ ~ t 3 Z ~5i r W ~ Z . ice, ~~ LL nEttzzott cnGNwisonnve TOM DOD$ON & ASSOCIATES Wilson Avenue Extension • Focused Coastal California v~ ~w r_t ~ V lJ d o ~ . ~ ~ d rv ~ ti Z M O Qy O m O D o C ~ O O W } :'1 i .-l i~ • N W d w v u O ~ da rv CZ) eN Z m O N rn O W ~ O ~~ f W Q 0 0 w c Cn in o W -~! m~ zz~~,% to W d _ w .. z `n OI w W Y F". ~ d'' Z > Z ~' ~. d ~ ~ -•~ O 0 'L ~j N ll L Q ~w u ~ m z F}- Q ~ Z F^ 7 W ~ 7 c Q ¢ a ~ ~ N ~ in c w H ~` .; it ~~. .~ L 2 G G q ~ d 2 C ~ Z ~ ~ ~nrr v:'zQ~ w. = ~ ~ rr ~ w w y to w r ~ > ~ ~ ~( ~ J O ~ Z ~ ~ c~ ~ J ~ W Q W' ~ 7J v ~ v > w u 2 0r~i a ~ ~ ~ v~ ~ in ~n 1 .1 r ~ ~ W `-i oil ~~ Z r,r h`- c ~ IL ~ ~ V 11 C ~~„ ~ ~ G.1 ;~ -~ ~ ~ ? yr ~ J ~ ii ~ C +~ ~ ~ ` _~ a a l ~, a ~,~ ~ ti a' *~ r ~ C r ~ ,.:, ~~ M i d ~u '~ 1 I n ' ~ ` ~~4 ., _ .`± La \ ~ .~ F. T 1n V ,~7 y r S x J ~ T ~ ~ 47 ~ T L ~ _'•. ' c ~ F1 ; iT j `A ~ ~ ;~ Y , ~,ir ~' ; ~ Y ~ . r ,I .j ~ .. J T a r i 5 ~] V ~ y I ,~. ,1 cr s ;.. z ~ ~ °~ ~ t J . ~ tJ i C ,~ W > ~ ~+ U 4 ~~ ~ ~ _ (c ~ '~ L w C Z =~ I w ~J ~ ~ ~ 4 _. q .l a ~} il ~) GGCC"' in f `, '~ j 7 ~ ~ ~_ m _ ~ a ~ ~~' ~ ~~ Z G '4 _ J~ > > J i Q ~l ~~\ W 3 C C Li ~ ~J ~ r > ~~ .. ~ ~~ O J1~ Z O I ~' ~ :7 u z i f11 e LL 1 AE1122011 CAGN WiISOnAve TOM DODSON & ASSOCIATES Wilson Avenue Extension Focused Coastal California Gnatcatcher Survey • APPENDIX B SITE PHOTOGRAPHS AE712 2011 CAGN Wilson Ave TOM DODSON Sc ASSOCIATES Wilson Avenue Extension • • • Photo #1 Typical Site View Looking West Photo #2 Typical Site View Looking East Focused Coastal California Gnatcatcher Survey AE112 2011 CAGN Wilson Ave TOM DODSON $ ASSOCIATES Wilson Avenue Extension • • • Photo #3 Typical Site View Looking North Focused Coastal California Gnatcatcher Survey AE7122011 CAGN WilsonAve TOM DODSON & ASSOCIATES STAFF REPORT ENGINEERING SERVICES DEA~RTMENT Date: December 2l, 2011 To: Mayor and Members of the City Council John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Mark A. Steuer, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer By: Fred Lyn, Utilities Division Manager P738 RANCHO C,UCAMONGA Subject: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ESTABLISHING A RENEWABLE ENERGY RESOURCES PROCUREMENT PLAN AND ENFORCEMENT PROGRAM PURSUANT TO CALIFORNIA SENATE BILL X1-2 RECOMMENDATION Approval of a Resolution of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga establishing a Renewable Energy Resources Procurement Plan and Enforcement Program pursuant to California Senate Bill X1-2. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Over the past 5 years, the electric utility industry has increasingly been governed by federal and state legislative efforts to reduce environmental impacts such as climate change and air pollution. These new regulations include the amount of renewable energy used to serve retail electric load, commonly called a renewable portfolio standard, or RPS. Non-compliance with these regulations could result in penalties to the City's municipal utility. History of the Renewable Portfolio Standard (RPSI In 2002, Senate Bill (SB) 1078 established the State's first RPS of 20 percent by 2017 for the investor owned utilities (IOUs), while allowing the governing board of a publicly owned utility (POU) (i.e. City Council) to implement and enforce its own RPS and not be tied to a statewide RPS mandated of the IOUs. In 2006, SB 107 accelerated the RPS for IOUs to 20 percent by 2010. In 2008, former Governor Schwarzenegger signed a 33 percent RPS Executive Order in 2008, but it was not an enforceable law and did not include POUs. In May 2008, the Rancho Cucamonga City Council adopted a RPS goal for Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility (RCMU): 20 percent by 2010 and 33 percent by 2020. SB X1-2 In April 2011, SB X1-2 was signed and adopted by Governor goal and enforcement to be applied to both IOUs and POUs, must achieve a minimum "average" 20 percent RPS between steadily increase the RPS amount to 33 percent by 2020. Jerry Brown, establishing a revised RPS including RCMU. Under SB X1-2, RCMU calendar years 2011 and 2013, and then In addition to setting forth overall RPS objectives, SB X1-2 established minimum and maximum allowable resources to meet the RPS requirements. SB X1-2 has made it clear that in-state renewable resources are preferred by imposing limits on the maximum amount of out-of-state energy and/or renewable energy credit (REC) a load serving entity like RCMU can count towards it RPS. The most common eligible renewable energy facilities includes: Solar photovoltaic, wind, small hydroelectricity, geothermal, landfill gas and biomass. P139 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT DECEMBER 21, 2011 PAGE 2 Council Subcommittee Recommendation: At the December 7, 2011, Public Works Subcommittee meeting, the subcommittee recommended approval of the resolution establishing a Renewable Energy Resource Procurement Plan and Enforcement Program pursuant to Senate Bill X1-2. RENEWABLE ENERGY RESOURCES PROCUREMENT PLAN SB X1-2 through Public Utilities Code section 399.30 requires the Rancho Cucamonga City Council to revise its existing RPS and adopt a Renewable Energy Resources Procurement Plan with a public hearing by January 1, 2012. The procurement plan would establish a minimum quantity of electricity products from eligible renewable energy resources, including renewable energy credits (REC), establish procurement targets, the quantity of eligible renewable energy resources required over certain compliance periods and eligible procurement content categories. Adoption of the attached resolution would satisfy this requirement. I. Procurement Targets A. Adopt Compliance Compliance Period One: January 1, 2011, to December 31, 2013. Periods Comoliance Period Two: January 1, 2014, to December 31, 2016. Comoliance Period Three: January 1, 2017, to December 31, 2020. B. Adopt Procurement . An average of 20% during Compliance Period ("CP") one. Targets • 25% by the final year in CP two. • 33% by the final year in CP three. C. Consider Adopting Goals RPS procurement in intervening years in CPs two and three should for Intervening Years reflect "reasonable progress." II. Procurement Content Categories A. Define Procurement Bucket One: Eligible renewable energy resource electricity that meet Buckets the requirement of "in-state" or "out-of-state" resources scheduling power directly to a California balancing authority in accordance with PUC section 399.16(b)(1) _ Bucket Two: Firmed and shaped eligible renewable energy resource ~ _ electricity products providing incremental electricity and scheduled - _ into a California balancing authority, in accordance with PUC section 399.16(b)(2) Bucket Three: Eligible renewable energy resource electricity products or any fraction of the electricity generated, including unbundled renewable energy credits that do not qualify under the criteria of Cate ories 1 or 2. B. Adopt Procurement Bucket One: (1) at least 50% in CP one; (2) at least 65% in CP two; Bucket Targets and (3) at least 75% from that point on. Bucket Three: (1) 25% or less in CP one; (2) 15% or less in CP 2; and (3) 10% or less in CP 3. P140 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT DECEMBER 21, 2011 PAGE 3 III. Grandfathered Resources A. Adopt Procurement Contracts executed before June 1, 2010 are exempt from the Grandfathering Rules Procurement Bucket Requirements. RCMU Grandfathered Resources Counter a Project Name T e Capacity MW Contract Date Delivery Year Term Years Location State Fortistar Mid-Valley Landfill Gas 2.5 July 2008 2008 10 California Fortistar Milliken Landfill Gas 2.5 Jul 2008 2008 10 California IV. Procurement Plan Resources (Compliance Period 1) Procurement Plan Resources Project Type Contract Term Delivery Location Name Date (Years) Year (State) Fortistar (Bucket 1) Fortistar (Bucket 1) Mid-Valley Landfill Gas Milliken Landfill Gas Jul-08 Jul-OB 10 2013 Califomia 10 2013 Califomia RECs (Bucket 3) N/A RECs Oct-11 Short Term Unspecified Unspecified Unspecified 2012 Renewable (Bucket 1 or 2) 1 I 2011 I WECC Region 1 I .2012 I Califomia V. Procurement Plan Adoption Est. CP 1 (2011-13) 201,733 Retail Sales MWh CP1 CP1 (2011-13) RPS% MWh 13,500 7% 12,000 6% 11,000 5% 5,000 2% Total RPS 20% A. Adopt Procurement Plan I. Schedule There is limited statutory guidance, but procurement plans can be adopted either on an annual basis or for each compliance period. B. Notice Requirements Any discussions and proposed changes made to the procurement plan must be noticed in accordance with the normal Brown Act requirements. Notice and any documents to be presented at the meeting must also be provided to the CEC. C. Reporting Requirements Provide data annually to the Energy Commission and to the City's customers. P141 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT DECEMBER 21, 2011 PAGE 4 RENEWABLE ENERGY RESOURCES ENFORCEMENT PROGRAM Per SB X1-2, the Rancho Cucamonga City Council must also adopt and implement a renewable energy resources enforcement program, which would establish the preservation of its authority to enforce and oversee compliance regarding RPS requirements, as well as delay or waive RPS requirements under certain circumstances, or conditions, if appropriate. Adoption of the attached resolution would satisfy this requirement. A. Adopt Rules for Reducing Governing Boards for POUs will most likely be able to alter the Procurement Confent procurement bucket requirements based on specified transmission, Rules supply, or reliability conditions. B. Adopt Deferral Rules RPS Compliance can be deferred based on specified transmission, supply, or reliability reasons. C. Adopt Banking Rules Certain excess procurement can be banked in on CP to be used in the next CP. D. Adopt Cost Limitations Governing Boards have wide latitude to adopt cost limitations once rules and regulations have been established by the CEC. RCMU shall strive to procure adequate and eligible supplies of renewable energy resources to meet the procurement targets and bucket requirements set forth in its Enforcement Program. However, costs for eligible renewable energy resources will be higher than the average energy costs currently purchased from the wholesale energy market. Once cost limitation rules and regulations are established by the CEC, RCMU intends to implement cost limitations to its Enforcement Program that will address adverse situations beyond RCMU's control that may arise, possibly preventing RCMU from meeting its RPS procurement targets in a timely manner. The cost limitation factor would also address the potential cost impact it may have for RCMU's ratepayers. It is the goal of RCMU and the City Council to comply with all the targets set forth in the Enforcement Program at the least cost possible, without placing any risk to the reliability and fiscal health of the electric utility. Respectively submitted, - . ~...- M r Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer P142 RESOLUTION II'^ I S.3 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ESTABLISHING A RENEWABLE ENERGY RESOURCES PROCUREMENT PLAN AND ENFORCEMENT PROGRAM PURSUANT TO CALIFORNIA SENATE BILL X1-2 WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga is authorized under various provisions of the California Constitution and the general laws of California (including, specifically, Article XI, Section 9(a) of the California Constitution, Public Utilities Code Section 10004, and Government Code section 39732(a)) to establish, purchase, and operate a public utility to furnish its inhabitants with, among other things, electricity; and ("City"); and WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga operates a municipal electric utility WHEREAS, as a municipal electric utility, the City is generally subject to the legislative and regulatory requirements applicable to local publicly owned electric utilities ("POUs"); and WHEREAS, the State of California passed Senate Bill 2 (1st Extraordinary Session) ("SBX1-2"), effective as of December 10, 2011, requiring POUs, including the City, to adopt and implement, among other things, a renewable energy resources enforcement program and procurement plan that requires the City to procure a minimum quantity of eligible renewable energy resources over certain periods; and WHEREAS, SBX1-2 requires the Rancho Cucamonga City Council, as the governing board of the City, to ensure that the amount of eligible renewable energy resources to be procured by the City for the period from January 1, 2011, to December 31, 2013, is equal to an average of 20 percent of retail sales; and that the City makes reasonable progress to ensure that the procurement of eligible renewable energy resources achieves 25 percent of retail sales by December 31, 2016, and 33% of retail sales by December 31, 2020, and in all subsequent years; and WHEREAS, SBX1-2 authorizes the Rancho Cucamonga City Council, as the governing board of the City, to adopt cost limitations for procurement expenditures of renewable energy resources at levels that avoid disproportionate rate impacts; and WHEREAS, SBX1-2 establishes conditions that allow for the delay of timely compliance under certain limited circumstances, including lack of availability of eligible renewable energy resources; and WHEREAS, the Rancho Cucamonga City Council, as the governing board of the City, is required under SBX1-2 to adopt a program for the enforcement of the City's obligations under SBX1-2 on or before January 1, 2012, and hold a publicly noticed meeting offering all interested parties an opportunity to comment; and WHEREAS, the Califomia Energy Commission ("CEC") is directed to adopt regulations specifying procedures applicable to POUs for the enforcement of the requirements of SBX1-2, and the CEC's finding of a failure of the City to comply with SBX1-2 may result in penalties to be assessed by the California Air Resources Board; P743 NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. A program for the enforcement of the requirements established under SBX1-2 is hereby adopted as set forth in Attachment A, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein ("RPS Enforcement Program"). SECTION 2. The City Manager or his/her duly authorized designee has developed and presented for City Council approval a Renewable Energy Resources Procurement Plan, as further described in the RPS Enforcement Program._ SECTION 3. The City Manager or his/her duly authorized designee shall develop and present for City Council approval a cost limitation and availability criteria consistent with the requirements of SBX1-2, as further described in the RPS Enforcement Program. SECTION 4. Except for matters specifically reserved under SBX1-2 for action by the City Council, as governing board of the City, the City Manager or his/her duly authorized designee is authorized and directed to do and perform all acts required in the, RPS Enforcement Program to fulfill obligations pertaining to the City under SBX1-2. SECTION 5. This resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption. P744 ATTACHMENT A RENEWABLE ENERGY RESOURCES ENFORCEMENT PROGRAM This Renewable Energy Resources Enfdreement Program (RPS Enforcement Program) shall apply to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, operating through its municipal electric utility (City). Section 1: Definitions The definitions set forth in Public Resources Code (PRC) § 25741 and Public Utilities Code (PUC) § 399.12 are incorporated herein. The following definitions shall also apply to this RPS Enforcement Program: Renewable Energy Resources Procurement Plan: The plan adopted by the City Council pursuant to PUC § 399.30, as further described in Section 10. Energy Commission: The State Energy Resources Conservation and Development Commission. CPUC: The California Public Utilities Commission. Section 2: Compliance Periods The City Council adopts the following compliance-periods as required by PUC § 399.30(b): Compliance Period One: January 1, 2011, through December 31, 2013 Compliance Period Two: January 1, 2014, through December 31, 2016 Compliance Period Three: January 1, 2017, through December 31, 2020 Section 3: Procurement Targets The City Council adopts the following RPS-eligible (electricity products from eligible renewable energy resources, including renewable energy credits (RECs)) procurement goals as a minimum percentage of retail sales, pursuant to PUC § 399.30(c)(1)-(2): Compliance Period One: • H;n average of 20% RPS-eligible resource procurement for the period starting with the later of January 1, 2011, or the effective date of PUC § 399.30, through December 31, 2013. Compliance Period Two: • By December 31, 2016: 25% RPS-eligible resource procurement. • January 1, 2014, through December 31, 2016, sufficient procurement to reflect reasonable progress to ensure the above goal is achieved. P145 Compliance Period Three: • By December 31, 2020: 33% RPS-eligible resource procurement. • January 1, 2017, through December 31, 2020, sufficient procurement to reflect reasonable progress to ensure the above goal is achieved. Section 4: Procurement Content Categories The City Manager or his/her duly authorized designee shall assign all RPS-eligible resources procured by the City to their appropriate procurement content category in accordance with the provisions of PUC § 399.30(c)(3), consistent with PUC § 399.16. Section 5: Grandfathering of Procurement Content Category Requirements The City Manager or his/her duly authorized designee shall count all resources meeting the requirements of PUC § 399.16(d) in full towards the procurement requirements set forth in this RPS Enforcement Program, if all of the following conditions are met: (a) the renewable energy resource was eligible under the rules in place as of the date when the contract was executed; and (b) any contract amendments or modifications occurring after June 1, 2010, do not increase the nameplate capacity or expected quantities of annual generation, or substitute a different renewable energy resource; provided that the duration of the contract may be extended if the original contract specified a procurement commitment of 15 or more years. This provision permits, but does not require, resources meeting the requirements of PUC § 399.16(d) to be exempted from the procurement content requirements. Section 6: Deviation From Procurement Content Category Requirements The City Council may waive or reduce a procurement content requirement set forth in this RPS Enforcement Program to the extent the City demonstrates that it cannot comply with such requirements because of: (a) conditions beyond the control of the City due to any one of the conditions set forth in PUC § 399.15(b)(5); or (b) other conditions adopted by the City Council based on facts reasonably found by the City Council to be consistent with the intent of PUC § 399.15(b)(5) or PUC § 399.18 and the unique circumstances facing the City as a small municipal electric utility. Section 7: Delay of Timely Compliance, The City Council may adopt measures permitting the City to delay timely compliance with this RPS Enforcement Program pursuant to PUC § 399.30(c)(2), consistent with the requirements of PUC § 399.15(b)(5) or other conditions adopted by the City Council based on facts reasonably found by the City Council to be consistent with the intent of PUC § 399.15(b)(5). Section 8: Banking Rules The City Council may adopt measures permitting the City to accumulate, beginning January 1, 2011, excess procurement in one compliance period to be applied to any subsequent compliance period provided that the quantity of excess procurement is determined in the same manner as allowed for retail sellers pursuant to PUC § 399.13(a)(4)(B). P746 Section 9: Cost Limitations The City Council may establish a limitation on the procurement expenditures for all RPS-eligible resources used to comply with this RPS Enforcement Program. In establishing such limit, the City Council shall rely on elements consistent with PUC § 399.15(c)(1)-(3) and with pertinent policies and rules established by the City Council, including but not necessarily limited to rate regulations and existing bond covenants. The cost limitation value shall be included in the Renewable Energy Resources Procurement Plan, as described in Section 10. Section 10: Renewable Energy Resources Procurement Plan The City Council directs the City Manager or his/her duly authorized designee to develop and present a Renewable Energy Resources Procurement Plan to the City Council. At a minimum, the Renewable Energy Resources Procurement Plan shall include: (a) the specified resources that the City plans to use to meet the procurement targets adopted in Section 3, above; and (b) the flexible compliance mechanisms to be utilized by the City pursuant to Sections 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9, above. The City shall post a public notice whenever the City Council will deliberate in public on the Renewable Energy Resources Procurement Plan. The City shall also provide data annually to the Energy Commission and to report annually to the City's customers and the Energy Commission in accordance with PUC § 399.30. Section 11: Enforcement The City Council directs the City Manager or his/her duly authorized designee to inform the City Council at a public meeting in the event that the City will not meet the procurement requirements set out in Sections 3 and 4 above, subject to the flexible compliance mechanisms of Sections 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9, above. As soon as reasonably practicable following his/her informing the City Council the City Manager or his/her duly authorized designee shall develop and present a plan to bring the City into compliance. STAFF REPORT PUBLIC WORKS SERVICES DEP~IRTMENT Date: December 21, 2011 To: Mayor and Members of the City Council John R. Gillison, City Manager From: William Wittkopf, Public Works Services Director Dean Rodia, Parks and Landscape Maintenance Superintendent Subject: UPDATE ON DECEMBER CITY-WIDE WIND EVENT P747 RANCHO ICUCAMONGA BACKGROUND The following is an update on the city-wide wind event which started during the early morning of December 1 through December 6. Beginning at 2:00 a.m., on Thursday, December 1, Public Works crews began responding to reports of high wind with multiple downed trees, damaged vehicles and structures. By 6:00 a.m., the Departmental Operations Center (DOC) was in full operation and all available city crews (20 field crews, 58 staff) were assigned to handle the emergency calls. Over 300 requests for service were recorded by 6:00 p.m. with new requests for service still being received. In addition to the DOC being open and active, the EOC was opened at 9:00 a.m. on December 1 and remained at level 1 activation until 3:00 p.m. December 6. The majority of the wind damage was reported north of the I-210 freeway. Additionally, the area between Milliken and Rochester (Caryn Community), the vicinity of Banyan and Hellman and the Victoria Community sustaining a large amount of downed trees, both public and private, resulting in blocked roadways and damage to both public and private property. Mukiple power outages were reported with most of the power being restored by the end of the day and all power back on by Friday. Road closures along Hellman Avenue were needed to handle multiple utility poles and wires down, but were opened by the end of the day. Other areas of wind damage were scattered throughout the communities and several City parks sustained substantial damage. The Public Works Services Department's methodology of addressing this wind event was prioritized in the following manner: to make sure public access was cleared and safe, private and public property was safe and secured, potential hazards were evaluated and eliminated, minor debris was continually picked up and removed and all areas were visually inspected by crews as the clean up efforts continued. Over the weekend, the DOC remained open responding to resident calls of wind damage and reports from crews as they traveled through their assigned areas. The Public Works staff worked to clear debris, hanging limbs and fallen trees from roadways and pedestrian access areas. City crews were assisted through contractor support by focusing on certain assigned locations (Caryn Community and Heritage Park) and addressing the downed trees in many areas. UPDATE ON DECEMBER CITY-WIDE WIND EVENT DECEMBER 21.2011 PAGE 2 In addition to downed and damaged trees, the City sustained damage to irrigation systems, fencing, electrical systems, and curb and sidewalk damage. Future assessments and evaluations of the wind hit areas will provide information needed to address any further actions such as tree replacement or infrastructure repairs. Summary of Activity: 9:00 am as Requests for Service • Calls for service: >655 • Initial responses: >655 • Completed (No Follow-up Required): >450 Scope of Damage • Trees Down or Damaged • Power Out • Damaged Block Walls • Fencing Down or Damaged • Damaged Irrigation Lines • Sidewalk Damage • Landscape Damage • Significant Private Property Damage o Homes o Vehicles o Driveways Scope of Effort • Average daily PW staff directly involved in stone related operations: 35 • Contractors indirect support of stone cleanup: 2 (United Pacific Services, Mariposa Landscape) • Estimated cleanup completion dates: o Streets: 12/15/11 o Landscape Districts: 12/22/11 0 407 tons of debris has been collected at this point in the clean up. o Parks: • Major work complete by 12/10/11 • Smaller cleanup in parks by 12/15/11 • Stump Grinds: Approx. 200 plus trees will be scheduled for stump grinding and will be done beginning 4 to 6 weeks following initial cleanup • Stump Removals: Approx. 20 plus stumps will need be removed by tractor and filled back in • Approx. 200 plus trees will be scheduled for re-plant when funds become available. • Damaged tree evaluations and service request follow ups will continue through January 2012. On Saturday, December 10, Governor Brown declared a State of Emergency for Los Angeles County and its cities and the City of Rancho Cucamonga to help with the recovery efforts. Res ully bmitt , William Wittkopf Public Works Services Director P148 W W:dr .,1 - MUyOr L. DENNIS MICHAEL • MaYor P!'aTen! SAM SrACNOLo Council MfmGeri WILLIAM ). ALIiXANDCH, CHUCK )SUQUE'l', DIANE WILL{nnas City Manngm JOHN R. GILLISON THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA RANCHO CUCAMONGA December 21, 2011 To the resident at 6778 Hellman Avenue: The Eucalyptus trees on Hellman Avenue have recently been inspected as part of our yeazly inspection process by the City's Certified Arborist. This inspection process is an effort to identity and address issues that can arise from decay, structural stability and the overall decline of Eucalyptus trees throughout the city. One of the Eucalyptus trees in front of your house exhibited signs that indicate internal decay, and out of concern for public safety this tree was scheduled for removal on Wednesday, December 14, 2011. Due to the recent wind storm event the removal was postponed. The tree in front of your house and within the City's right-of--way is scheduled to be removed on January 4, 2012. To gain a better understanding of this decision it is important to know the problems that have affected the Eucalyptus trees over the years, and have led to the decline of some of them. Some of these problems include: 1) Raising the soil grade above the trunk and root system 2) Root damage caused by development and construction 3) Excessive pruning 4) Subsequent attacks by insects and decay causing organisms If you would like a replacement tree planted, please contact me so that planting arrangements can be made. The planting of a new replacement tree is not mandatory at this time. Thank you for your cooperation, ~~ M Dean Rodia Pazks & Landscape Maintenance Superintendent (909) 477-2730, ext. 4137 ec: John R. Gillison, City Manager Mayor and City Council Planning Commission 10500 Civic Ccnrcr Dr. • RO. Box 807 • Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729.0807 • Tcl (909) 477-2700 • Fax (909) 477-2849 • www.CiryofRC.us Mayor L. DeNws MICHAIi I. • Mayar Piro Tera SAM SPACNOLO Caxntil Mcmberr WILLIAM J. ALEXANDER, CHUCK BUQUET, DIANE WILLIAhi$ Ciry ManagerJoHN R. GaL1soN 1 THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA RANCHO C,,UCAMONGA December 21, 2011 To the resident at 7202 Hellman Avenue: The Eucalyptus trees on Hellman Avenue have recently been inspected as part of our yeazly inspection process by the City's Certified Arborist. This inspection process is an effort to identify and address issues that can azise from decay, structural stability and the overall decline of Eucalyptus trees throughout the city. One of the Eucalyptus trees in front of your house exhibited signs that indicate internal decay, and out of concern for public safety this tree was scheduled for removal on Wednesday, December 14, 2011. Due to the recent wind storm event the removal was postponed. The tree in front of your house and within the City's right-of--way is scheduled to be removed on January 4, 2012. To gain a better understanding of this decision it is important to know the problems that have affected the Eucalyptus trees over the years, and have led to the decline of some of them. Same of these problems include: 1) Raising the soil grade above the trunk and root system 2) Root damage caused by development and construction 3) Excessive pruning 4) Subsequent attacks by insects and decay causing organisms If you would like a replacement tree planted, please contact me so that planting arrangements can be made. The planting of a new replacement tree is not mandatory at this time. Th'arilc you^for your cooperation, ~ ~ ` u ~~~ Dean Rodia Parks & Landscape Maintenance Superintendent (909) 477-2730, ext. 4137 cc: John R. Gillison, City Manager Mayor and City Counci] Planning Commission 10500 Civic Cemcr Dr. • EO. Hox 807 • Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729-0807 •'rcl (909) 477-2700 • Fax (909) 477-2649 • www.CityofRC.us r O N .. ~ r Q W ~' :~ L Z.~ ~ ~ ~ ~, ,~ ~~ ~ V ~=". ~ Gs p •-+ D N V ._ O V ._ a r N N O ~ o a~ ~ ~ N ~ '~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ ° ~ ~ a~ W O ~ ~ ~ ~a cn ~ ~o ~ U ~ o Q ~~ c o ~~ ~ li ~ O ~ U ~ (6 N ~+ > O ~ ~_ ~ L ~ m - C L }' O C >+ ~ 0 0~ 0 ~~ O =c~_~ ~~:r ~~ ~ ~ +~ O ~~ D NNN ~-~ ~~' ~ O ~ O ~ U ~ ~~'=~. ~ ~ O O O ~ ~ ~= O N cn ~_ ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~` ~t ~ ~ ~ ~ U cn O ~ •- N N ~ ~ p N >+ ~ U V ~ N ~ ~ ~' ~ ~+ = 0 0 ~ ~ ~ V ~ (~ ~ • • • • ~ ~ ~ O .N ~ ~ U O ~ O O L- ~O~ O +~ N O N ~ C ~ }, N O ~_ ~ ~ '~ ~ O .~ 0 ~ N ~ ~ ~ N ~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ N a ~ O cii Cam ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ !~ L C ~~ ca ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .~ c~a ~ o ~~ > ~ a~ •~ ~ ~ ~ a~ ~ U ~ ~~~ N O ~ N O L ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ ,C ~O ~, N _ L N~ (6 ~ ~ O U O ~ N ~ ~.~~ ~ ~~~ ~ t6 ~ C N ~ to ~ i ~O ~ ~ i ~ O OU ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ In N ti ~ N to -~ > `~ ~ ~2c~O~~Q00~ L Q~ ~ ,}~ U ~ W C ~ ~ ~ ~ CO ~ ~ Q ~ ~ ~ ~, ~ J ~~ Q ~ i O N c~ ~ O ~ U (a Q C O E ~ ~ i ~ U O ~ ~ O ~ ~ •~ ~ L ~ ~ ~ N ~ ~ ~ r O ~ ~ Q ~ ~ U (~ O U O ~ U U O N N ~ N ~ ~ ~ (~ ~ Q ~ ~ . ~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ` M ~ ~ ~ C Q '- O O ~~ O ~~ ~~ c~ U O U -~ ~ ~ N O to O ~ ~ > (~ ~ O U ~ O ~ O ~ > ~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ ._ N ~ _ N J W a 0 a O D Z C (6 r r N L L O O ti r N N .L •~ r L >, N _U ~ ..a ~ ~ ~ U ~ 00 O N ~ ~ L O O O W ~ ~> Q ~ O U ~ ~ a O ~ ~ ~ ~ N L ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .~ N ...r ~ C C ~ ; ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o o ~ ~ ~ 0 ~_ ~ L a~ Z Ooa~a~~}'>,~ a~ ~ o c~ ~ cn 'ca ~ a~ ~ ~ oo ~ ca ~ o }' (~ o~oo~o'~o zU(!)NN+rN-+r • . • . • L ~ ~--~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .~ ~ U W ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~, a ~ ~~~ ~r Q ~ o :~ ~a o > +~ ~~O _ ~ ~ ~ .~ ~ ~(6 .Q (a~~~ ~~/ >~~ ~ i N ~ ~ ~ Lim ~ O (n ~ ~~ ~ V 0 C ~ ~ V i ~ ~ ~~~~ ~~ :~ C z ~ ~ .~ .N ~ - N ~ N ~ (a ~~~ ~~~~ ~ (~ cn N ~ N j c Z ~ ~ LL ca ca ca ~ . N U c~ ±~ 1 c ~o L i d 1 V 0 1 o~ wN W V ^~ ~L -'~:' L JS .~ f+ N 3 as L r, V L .. ;~ ..rte°. ,` V a W 1 O 1 W L C 3 0 -~ 0 L a 0 L a d L 3 0 -~ E 0 d a~ ~a ca ca 3 a~ 1~ W a D Z '_'^^. V1 w A O 0 ~~/ Fil .~ .~ U V .~ .~ A O .~ .~ bA .... N ~ ~ ~ ~ d ~ ~ ~ ~ .-. c N ~ ~ ~ C ... ~ to .. ~ Q ~ L .6 ~ y (( . C ~ = ~ V ~ •- ~ O d i v ._ c •_ °' y.. ~~ ~ C N ~ ~° - c y . cn ~ a Q N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~"".. ~ = ~ V ~ y m cn ._ a a Q C`• C/1 Z O w C~ W ~ W ~ ~ V Z W Q ~ J C~ J ~ W ~ = 00 ~ ~ ~ ~ U ~ O ~ Q ~ ~ •- O U ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ a~ ~ ~- cn U > .~ 0 0 r~ V _~ m O O ~ ~ ~ c~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ N U (~ ~ 2 W W •+ ~W ~ w/ V Z W Q J C~ J ~ W ~ N N L O .~ L Q ~ ~c •L _~ ~ (a ~ >~ 0 N - ~~ ~j U ~ ~~ W ~ _ U (Q ~ ~ ~ ~N C .~ ~ ~, ~ L ~ N ~ ~ ~L U~ ~~ > H(a0 O C .~ Q~ ~--~ Q~ O U ~~ Q L U~ ~ ~ ~ ~ C o~° ~ ~ (a O O ~ ~~>~ C U ~ ~~ ~O ~ cn ~- Q .~~~ Q ~ (~ (a ~~~ U }, ~ L O ~ ~ O C - +~ ~O ~ ~ ~ ~ Q U ~ .~ O .. (6 N ~ .L U `'- f/j ~ O ~ .~~~ ~ ~ ~~~ C U ~ N ~ ~~ ~~ ~ -~ C U ~ ~~~ c~ o c~~ (n Q~ C O i O ~~ ~ ~ O woo II' W SLY ~i J J W 0 ~L 0 V L ~r V L a 0 c U W J J W `Q V W /~ V N N ~' (~ ~ ~ ~ L 0 (~ U ~ ~ U ~~ '~ N ~~~ ~ ~ U ~ L~ ~ U ~ .~ ~ a ~o~ ~~a O ~~ °o ~ ~ U O~ ~ N~ ~ ~cacn ~~ ~ O ~~ _ O L Q ~ Q _N ~ C ~ ~_ ~~ ~_ ~ ~ C ~ (a ~ U ,~ ~ O L .~ ~ ~~ ~` ~~ ~~ U (n ~ O ~~ O U C ~ N ~ L .~~~ ~ Q~ .~~C ~~~_ U~ ~~ O N~ ~ C ~ to ~ ~ ~ i--r ,},~ ~ ~ ~ a--~ ~ ~ O ~ O ~ ~~ .~0~ ~ ~ •-~_ ~ L L ~ U ~ U ~ O ~ o~~ a~ ~ c ~ °o ~ ~ ~ (~ ~ ~ a, ~, ~ U ~ O ~ ~ ~~ ~ (6 ~ -- ~ O ~ N ~~~~ ~~ W m Z LL J W W Q W Z i`i V W C~ m N L Q~ ~ ~ a--+ ~~L 0 L Q ~~~_ ~.~U ~L U ~~~ ~~~ ~ ~ nom' O '~+ W Q O ~ U .~ r~ 4- O ~ O (~ ~ ~--+ .~..r ~ ~L (~ L ~ Q U ~ ~ ~ o Q c o ~ ~ i ~ ~ U . ~ ~ ~ ~ C O ~ O ~~^\\\ L ~--~ O ~--+ (~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ •; •.+ Q O ~ U L ~o ~~ ~o ~~ L ~~ ~~ N ~ L ~ (~ f- ~ O ~_ • L ~O W ~ ~ a' W ~ ~ o ~ . ~ V ~ '~ ~ Z ~ ~ ~ N W ~ cv cCf Q ~ (~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ J C~ ~ ~ ~ J ~ ~ W ~ ~ >, ~ _ ~ `~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 2 ca . ~ .~ ~ ~ O ~ ~ U O ~~ ~ a? U ~ N ~ ~~ N N ~ ~~ ~~ ~o a~ ~ ~~ c~ a~ ~ ~ > O~ X ~ (~ O ~ ~ O O ~ ~ .~ _~ 0 Q~ ~Qa C N ~ ~ to ~ N ~ ~~ N ~' Q~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~.., ~ U UL.~ o~},~ L~-a~ '~~a~~ ~~'~~ ~ O ~ p N -- ~ > ~ ~ ~ (~N~O W W ~ ~ - ~ v Zw Q J C~ J ~ W ~ = 00 O ~ ~ O ~ O N ~ ~~ N O N N ~ ~ p o ~ ~ c~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ > c~ ~ ~ O L U O N O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N N ~ ~ ~ i a~ ~ a~ a~ ~ ~' ~ ~ ~' ~ ~ ~ Q ~ ~ ~ o ~ o o ~ ~ L ~ o a ~._ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a~ a~ ca ~ o ~ Q ~ V U O N ~~ O ~~ ~ccs Zc W ~ W ~ ~/• V Zw Q J C~ J as W ~ = m ~ N ~ ~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ LU 'D~'~ ~ U~ ~ U'~ O ~ ~ = U ~ C ~ ~ ~ N ~ N ~ c~ ca ~ N C N .~ '~_ _ ~ ~ > LO (~ ~ ~ ~(~f ~U .C~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ Q U .~ ~ L ~ ~ ~ ~ O Q~ Q O Qw C ~+r O~_~ OHO N~ CU• ~QU c~ ~ a~ ~ a~ 00 hoc ~--c ~~ ~~~ o~c ~~ ~~~ ~~~ ~ ~o~ ~ UDC ~~~U ~ ~ ~ ~Cp 4-~N Q~ 0(6U Uoa.~ C~• Z O w C~ STAFF REPORT P149 REDEVELOPbfENTAGENCY Date: December 21, 2011 RANCHO cUCAMONGA To: Chairman and Members of the Redevelopment Agency John R. Gillison, Executive Director From: Linda Daniels, Deputy Director By: Donna Finch, Redevelopment Analyst I Subject: REVIEW AND APPROVE THE RANCHO CUCAMOMGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY FISCAL YEAR 2010/11 ANNUAL REPORT; AUTHORIZE THE TRANSMITTAL OF THE ANNUAL REPORT TO THE APPROPRIATE STATE AGENCIES; AND ACKNOWLEDGE THAT THE PLANNING AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES INCLUDED IN THE HOUSING FUNDS ARE NECESSARY FOR THE PRODUCTION, IMPROVEMENT OR PRESERVATION OF LOW AND MODERATE INCOME HOUSING FOR FISCAL YEAR 2010/11 Staff recommends that the Redevelopment Agency take the following actions: 1. Review and approve the Annual Report for Fiscal Year 2010111. 2. Authorize the transmittal of the Annual Report to the appropriate State agencies. 3. Acknowledge that the planning and administrative expenses included in the Housing funds are necessary for the production, improvement or preservation of low and moderate income housing for Fiscal Year 2010/11. Pursuant to Section 33080 of the State Health and Safety Code, every Redevelopment Agency is required to file an Annual Report of its activities within six months of the Agency's fiscal year end. This report is required to contain the following information: Activities which involved participation by the Agency in Fiscal Year 2010/11 and a description of the revenues and expenditures of the Agency. • Comparison of actual Agency achievements with the work program gdals identified in the Annual Report for Fiscal Year 2009/10. In accordance with Health and Safety Code Section 33334.3(d), a determination by the Agency that the planning and administrative expenses included in the Housing funds are necessary for the production, improvement or preservation of low and moderate income housing for Fiscal Year 2010/11. Fiscal Statement - In order to comply with H&S Code Section 33080.5 the Annual Report must include a fiscal statement for the previous fiscal year that contains the amount of outstanding indebtedness of the Agency; the amount of tax increment property tax revenues generated in the agency and in each project area; the amount of tax increment revenues P150 REVIEW AND APPROVE THE RANCHO CUCAMOMGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY PncE 2 FISCAL YEAR 2010/11 ANNUAL REPORT; AUTHORIZE THE TRANSMITTAL OF THE ANNUAL REPORT TO THE APPROPRIATE STATE AGENCIES; AND ACKNOWLEDGE THAT THE PLANNING AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES INCLUDED IN THE DECEMBER 21, 2011 paid to or spent on behalf of a taxing agency other than a school or community college district; the Financial Transactions Report; the amount allocated to school or community college districts; the amount of existing indebtedness and the total amount of payments required to be paid on existing indebtedness for that fiscal year; and any other fiscal information the Agency believes useful to describe its programs. • Blight Progress Report - In order to comply with H&S Code Section 33080.4 the Annual Report must specify actions and expenditures made in the previous fiscal year to alleviate blight. • Loan Report - In order to comply with H&S Code Section 33080.4 the Annual Report must identify loans receivable which equal or exceed $50,000 and that were found by the Agency during the previous Fiscal Year to have either defaulted or not complied with the terms of the Agreements approved by the Agency. There are no loans which the Agency made that are in default.. • Property Report - In order to comply with H&S Code Section 33080.4 the Annual Report must describe properties owned by the Agency during the Reports Fiscal Year as well as those acquired in a previous Fiscal Year. • Time Limits Report that-lists the fiscal years the Agency expects the time limits to expire on: eminent domain proceedings to acquire property within the project area; the establishment of loans, advances, and indebtedness to finance the redevelopment project; the effectiveness of the redevelopmeht plan, the time to repay indebtedness with the proceeds of property taxes. • Proposed work program goals for Fiscal Year 2011/12. All activities of the Agency that affected housing. • A copy of the Audit Report for Fiscal Year 2010/11. ANALYSIS The Annual Report for Fiscal Year 2010/11 is being transmitted to the Agency in accordance with the applicable legislation, and contains all of the required information as outlined above. Following the approval by the Redevelopment Agency; the report will be sent to the appropriate State agencies for review. Respectfully submitted, ~. ~ inda D. Daniels Deputy Director Attachment ANNUAL REPORT FISCAL YEAR 2010/11 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY BOARD MEMBERS L. Dennis Michael, Chairman Sam Spagnolo, Vice-Chairman William Alexander, Agency Member Chuck Buquet, Agency Member Diane Williams, Agency Member EXECUTIVE STAFF John R. Gillison, Executive Director Linda D. Daniels, Deputy Director P152 Table of Contents I. Introduction 3 II. Redevelopment Project Area Map 4 III. Fiscal Statement of Activities: Fiscal Year 2010/11 5 A. Commercial and Industrial Economic Enhancement Programs 5 B. Marketing and Promotions 13 C. Capitallmprovements 16 D. Workforce Housing 22 E. Workforce Housing Unit Summary 28 F. Property Report 29 G. Fiscal Statement 29 H. Time Limits 30 IV. Comparison of the Actual Achievements of Fiscal Year 2010/11 with the Goals Outlined in the Fiscal Year 2009/10 Annual Report 30 V. Work Program Goals for Fiscal Year 2011/12 34 A. Commercial and Industrial Economic Enhancement Programs 34 B. Marketing and Promotions 37 C. Capitallmprovements 38 F. Workforce Housing 40 VI. Audit for Fiscal Year 2010/11 41 VII. Statement of Indebtedness Fiscal Year 2011/12 41 2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Annua/Report 2010/11 Introduction This Annual Report is intended to satisfy the requirements of the California Health and Safety Code, beginning with Section 33080, as it pertains to the activities of the Redevelopment Agency during fiscal year 2010/11. This report summarizes the twenty- ninth complete fiscal year of the Agency's existence and the report will consider the following items: • The Agency's activities during fiscal year 2010/11. This discussion includes a description of the revenues and expenditures of the Agency • A comparison of the achievements of fiscal year 2010111 with the goals outlined in the Annual Report for fiscal year 2008/09 • A work program for fiscal year 2011/12 • A description of the Agency's activities affecting housing and displacement • An independent financial audit report for fiscal year 2010/11 The Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency In 1981, the Rancho Cucamonga City Council established the Redevelopment Agency (Agency) in order to alleviate blight and development barriers in the City. Through the establishment of a Redevelopment Project Area (see map on page 4), the Agency is able to use special legal and financial mechanisms to eliminate blight to improve the economic and physical conditions in designated areas of the City. Although the Agency is a separate legal entity, the City Council serves as the legislative body of the Agency. The Agency staff implements a redevelopment project area that encompasses approximately 8,500 acres. Agency staff also performs general administration for the Redevelopment Agency, coordinating budget and reporting requirements and maintaining the Agency's official records. P153 3 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Annua/ Replnrt 2010/11 II. Redevelopment Project Area Map P154 __ ` -, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA --~ Redevelopment Project Area 12~-vcHo C,,l?(:AAtONGA ILL DE L N N L N LEGEND 94NY NYAN Q ,/~'cny Bouxfary i zto NM~or Streets H '~ n x QRetlevelopment PrgeCt ( "' > ~ Area ~ ~ SE INE to r a ~ LI ~ LER Q,T/ w 0 HI y w l~ ARR W R ~ ~ m 9 H RSEY c7 H 0 1 M l H TH ' l es _ z a i:Ununeriercviewpisbrplprolecl arse mep.ap 4 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Annua/Report 2010/11 III. Fiscal Statement of Activities: Fiscal Year 2010/11 Credit Rating Standard & Poor's Ratings Services assigned it's A+ rating and stable outlook to the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency's tax allocation bonds. The rating reflects strong growth that has resulted in strong coverage levels and tax base diversification. The outlook remains stable. The "A+" rating reflects: • A large and diverse project area encompassing approximately 8,500 acres; • Strong growth in assessed valuation (A~ coupled with a low volatility ratio; • Good coverage of debt service; and • An adequate additional bonds test (ABT) of 1.25 x Maximum Annual Debt Service (MADS). Maior Programs A. Commercial and Industrial Economic Enhancement Programs and Events One of the Agency's primary efforts is to enhance the City's economic base. To do this, the Agency has created a variety of programs designed to address the needs of existing businesses and to facilitate business expansions and attractions. The Redevelopment Agency recognizes the diverse needs of businesses and has, for some time now, adopted an economic development strategy to retain and attract businesses that will strengthen Rancho Cucamonga's economic base and help eliminate blight in the community. During fiscal year 2010/11, approximately 954 new businesses began operations in Rancho Cucamonga. The following is a general description of the Agency's accomplishments regarding its commercial and industrial enhancement programs and events during fiscal year 2010/11. P155 5 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Annua/ Rep~yrt 2010/11 COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL ECONOMIC ENHANCEMENT PROGRAMS AND EVENTS ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMS JOBS SUPPORTED Inland Em ire West End Job Fair 2,000 Business Relocation/Ex ansion Assistance 495 Small Business Develo ment Center 2 Third Pa Electrical Certification Pro ram 60 Victoria Gardens 3,500 TOTAL 6,057 NUMBER OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT EVENTS PARTICIPANTS International Trade Latin American Conference 75 Business A reciation Week 350 International Council of Sho in Centers (ICSC) Western Division Conference 15,000 National Association of Office and Industrial Pro erties Bus Tour 250 TOTAL 15,675 Job Fairs: In October 2010, the Agency partnered with several neighboring communities to implement the 2nd Annual Inland Empire West End Job Fair. This event was developed in response to the growing unemployment rate in the Inland Empire and has increased in size to attract over 100 employers and approximately 3000 job seekers during its second year. The West End Job Fair promotes the concept of "local jobs for local residents," a message that is consistent with the City's Healthy RC initiatives that aim to reduce traffic in the Inland Empire and create conditions that contribute to a sustainable environment. Staff is currently working with its West End Partners to implement this much needed event for a third year in a row in October 2011. In addition to its involvement in the West End Job Fair, the Agency has also maintained its partnership with Congressman David Dreier's office to provide the Road to Employment Job Fair in the spring of each year. • Business Relocation/Expansion Assistance: During this reporting period, Agency staff assisted a number of new and existing companies with their relocation, expansion, or consolidation efforts. A partial list of the firms include: o Advantage Adhesives is a manufacturer of custom pressure sensitive adhesive tapes. This company relocated from the City of Brea to a 26,000sf P156 6 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Annua/Report 2010/11 _ Rancho Cucamonga facility during the first quarter of 2010, and brought an additional 20 new jobs to the community. The Agency coordinated meetings with Advantage Adhesives and other City departments to assist them in meeting the City's fire, building and development code requirements. Advantage Adhesives also participated in the City's Third Party Electrical Certification Program, which provided them with a 30% reimbursement on the cost of certifying their electrical equipment to meet the National Electrical Code (NEC) standards. o Fan'ell's Ice Cream Parlour will open their newest location in Rancho Cucamonga during the fourth quarter of 2011. This restaurant will occupy a 7,400sf vacant restaurant site and will seat approximately 250 guests, with a very large outdoor patio area to accommodate large parties. Agency Staff assisted Farrell's throughout the development review process and provided employee recruitment assistance by identifying a site where they could hold their employee "auditions" and facilitating their participation in the Inland Empire West End Job Fair. Farrell's will bring an estimated 200 new jobs to the community. o Hobby Lobby is a national retailer of arts and crafts supplies and is scheduled to open its newest location in Rancho Cucamonga in the third quarter of 2011. This retail superstore will occupy a 75,OOOsf site that was previously occupied by Mervyns, and is expected to bring an estimated 80 new jobs to the community. Agency Staff assisted Hobby Lobby with securing the site for their new store and facilitated meetings with other City departments to assist them in meeting the City's fire, building and development code requirements. o Lazy Dog Cafe is an emerging leader in the southern California dining scene and is scheduled to open its newest location in Rancho Cucamonga in the second quarter of 2012. This full-service restaurant chain is building a brand new 8,175sf site and is expected to bring an estimated 75 new jobs to the community. Agency Staff has assisted Lazy Dog throughout the development review and building permitting process. o Oporto is an Australian-based fast food restaurant chain that specializes in fresh grilled chicken burgers. This company opened their first U.S. location in Rancho Cucamonga during the first quarter of 2011, and brought an additional 25 new jobs to the community. Agency Staff assisted Oporto with their employee recruitment process by facilitating their participation in the Inland Empire West End Job Fair, where they were able to hire all of their staff for their grand opening. o Skin Perfect is a Rancho Cucamonga-based company that specializes in non- surgical medical procedures and spa services. This company is in the process of expanding from their current location to a larger site in Rancho Cucamonga, and will occupy their new building in the fourth quarter of 2011. P157 7 P758 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Annua/Report2O10/IS The Agency has facilitated meetings with Skin_ Perfect and other City departments to assist them in meeting the City's fire, building and development code requirements. With this expansion, Skin Perfect is expected to bring an estimated 20 new jobs to the community. o SpectraSensors is a manufacturer of laser-based process instrumentation devices that are used by world-class natural gas and petrochemical companies. This expanded their current location in Rancho Cucamonga during the third quarter of 2010. Agency Staff worked with SpectraSensors throughout their expansion process and facilitated meetings with other City departments to assist this company in meeting the City's fire, building and planning code requirements. The Agency's assistance played a pivotal role in keeping the company in Rancho Cucamonga, which in turn retained 75 jobs in the community. • Small Business Development Center tSBDCI: In November 1997, the Agency established a contract with the Inland Empire Small Business Development Center (IESBDC) to provide business assistance services to companies and individuals residing in Rancho Cucamonga. This contract allows the Agency to offer free workshops and confidential one-on-one consulting services to both new and existing business owners and operators. During fiscal year 2010/11, the IESBDC provided services to 150 local businesses. In addition, 20 specialty workshops were held with 309 attendees. • Workforce Development: Through its collaborative participation with other regional workforce development organizations, the Redevelopment Agency continues to actively engage in projects and events that strengthen and grow the workforce in Rancho Cucamonga and the two-county area. The primary organization the Agency has been involved with is the West-End Workforce Opportunity Resource Collaborative (WE-WORC), a cross-section of representatives from government, education and business. Over the past year, this organization has continued to roll out its CareerQuest.TV website, promoting it to local school districts as an important career-oriented resource for students at the junior high, high school and college level, as well as the general public. Agency staff will continue to work with its WE-WORC partners in FY 2011/12 to create additional opportunities for implementing workforce training programs. • Third Partv Electrical Certification Program: During the reporting fiscal year 2010/11, three companies were assisted through the Agency's Third Party Electrical Certification Program. This program was developed to assist local manufacturers that are expanding or relocating to Rancho Cucamonga in complying with the National Electrical Code requirement for safety certifications. Participating businesses receive a 30% reimbursement for the costs of certifying their electrical equipment. 8 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Annua/ Report 2010/11 Victoria Gardens: Since its opening in 2004, Victoria Gardens has had a significant economic impact on the community, providing over 3,500 permanent full and part-time jobs for local residents, attracting an estimated 16 million visitors annually, and generating over a half million square feet of additional commercial development on adjacent properties. Initially opening with approximately 70 retail stores and restaurants, the 1.2 million square foot center is now home to over 170 retailers, restaurants and offices. The addition of Bass Pro Shops in 2007 provided another 500 jobs for local residents and draws additional tens of thousands of visitors from a primary market radius of up to 50 miles and a secondary market of up to 100 miles away. This has provided a positive impact on the local economy through additional sales tax revenues and helps bring greater visibility and patronage to Victoria Gardens and local hotels. • Rancho Advantage Program: During this reporting period, the Agency continued to implement its Rancho Advantage (Pre-Submittal Assistance) Program, which brings together principal representatives from the Building and Safety, Planning and Engineering Departments to advise new and expanding companies on their individual site-specific building and tenant improvement requirements. This program and has provided an expeditious and cost-effective approach for companies submitting their projects. • International Trade: In June 2011, Agency staff partnered with the cities of Chino and Ontario to host the 1St annual Latin American Connection, an international trade and exporting conference that was designed to introduce companies to the world of exporting and provide them with the information and resources they need to export products to Latin American countries. Representatives from Mexico, Argentina and Brazil were available to brief attendees on the product needs and exporting requirements for their countries. Several other organizations were also present to offer trade and exporting assistance, including Americas Integrated; Export-Import Bank; Inland Empire Small Business Development Center; United Parcel Service; U.S. Commercial Service; and legal experts that specialize in international trade activities. This event was very successful and attracted over 75 local manufacturers and distribution companies. Staff will continue to identify ways to expand these programs in FY 2011/12 and explore other world markets that may be good candidates for U.S. exporting. • Business Appreciation Week: For the past 14 years the Agency has declared one week in May as Business Appreciation Week. During fiscal year 2010111, P159 9 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Annua/ Report 2010/11 Business Appreciation Week was observed from May 2"d -May 6th, 2011. Events for the week included a golf tournament, hosted by the Rancho Cucamonga Chamber of Commerce, and the Agency-hosted Business Appreciation Night featuring a BBQ picnic and a Rancho Cucamonga Quakes baseball game at the Epicenter. Over 350 guests from 14 Rancho Cucamonga- based companies participated in this year's Business Appreciation Night event. This program is implemented as part of the Agency's ongoing business retention efforts to convey the City's appreciation to all Rancho Cucamonga businesses. International Council of Shopping Centers (ICSC): Staff attended the ICSC Western Division Conference in San Diego from September 22-24, 2010, to market the City and promote available retail sites in Rancho Cucamonga. During this two day conference, Agency Staff met with a number of national and regional retailers and developers that are interested in locating in Rancho Cucamonga. This conference is smaller than ICSC RECon Las Vegas, but allows Agency Staff to interface with a more localized contingent of real estate professionals that have expressed interest in building their business base in the southern California region. • National Association of Office and Industrial Properties (NAIOP): For the past eight years, the Agency has been an annual sponsor of NAIOP, the leading organization for developers, owners and related professionals in the commercial real estate industry. This sponsorship allows Agency staff to establish relationships with local office and industrial real estate brokers and attend various NAIOP events, including their annual bus tour, mid-year market review and golf tournament. The Agency plans to continue its support of NAIOP in the future. • Inland Empire Economic Partnership: The Agency continues to support the efforts of the Inland Empire Economic Partnership to implement and enhance economic development programs within San Bernardino and Riverside counties. Through participation at the board level, as well as regional economic development events and workshops, the Agency will continue to provide resources in FY 2011/12. • Business Visitation Program: The Agency continues to implement its Business Visitation Program to establish and maintain contact with the local business community. This program has provided Staff with the opportunity to meet with local business leaders and discuss questions or concerns that a company may be having regarding their business activities. These visitations have also given P160 10 P161 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Annual Report 2010/11 Staff the opportunity to learn more about the products and services that Rancho Cucamonga companies have to offer. Meeting with local businesses can help inform Staff of a company's planned expansion activities and enable Staff to assist these companies with identifying suitable sites in Rancho Cucamonga if the company is looking to expand to another location. Agency staff met with five businesses during the FY 2010/11 reporting year. • Rancho Cucamonga Chamber of Commerce: In 1999, the Agency entered into a Cooperative Agreement with the Rancho Cucamonga Chamber of Commerce to help promote economic development, tourism and business retention and attraction in the City. The Agency and the Chamber modified this Agreement in 2009 to include the creation and distribution of a Rancho Cucamonga Lifestyle Magazine. During this reporting period, the first issue of the Lifestyle Magazine was printed and distributed at all of the local hotels and popular visitor attractions. This publication has played an important role in promoting tourism in the City and informing visitors of popular shopping and travel destinations. • Business Connection Network (BCN): For the past several years, Agency Staff has attended the Rancho Cucamonga Chamber of Commerce's weekly networking breakfast meeting to support the Chamber of Commerce and inform local business owners about the various programs and services the Agency offers to assist the local business community. This meeting is widely attended and attracts 75-100 of the area's top business leaders each week. This ongoing effort has been a successful part of the Agency's business retention efforts and has helped Staff build valuable relationships with the local business community. Directional Guide Sian Program: In January 2008, the Agency commissioned a cross-departmental taskforce to develop and implement a Directional Guide Sign Program that provides vehicular directional assistance to major destinations in the community. The taskforce created a program policy to determine which destinations would be identified on the signs and hired a signage design firm to create a uniform sign template and assist with the implementation of the program. This program was completed in the 4th quarter of 2010 and has helped make the City more welcoming and accessible to both visitors and residents. The program has also contributed to the City's Healthy RC sustainability initiatives by identifying direct routes for vehicles to access major destinations in town, which has helped reduce traffic and vehicle pollution in the environment. 11 P162 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Annua/ Report 2010/11 Economic Development Banner Program: The Agency supports an ongoing street banner program that was developed in 1999 to encourage community pride and attract customers to the City's primary retail/commercial corridor along Foothill Boulevard. In FY 2010/11, the banner program was revitalized to include the display of newly designed Route 66-themed banner seasonal banners are scheduled to display annually during the spring and summer months to coincide with the community's peak travel season. These banners are part of a series of street improvements that the City has made to help ensure Foothill Blvd. will continue to be an exciting reflection of historic route 66. The holiday-themed banners will display during the fall and winter months and will help draw attention to the City's retail/commercial corridor during the holiday season. • Healthy RC Program: During this reporting period, the Agency played an important role in assisting with the ongoing implementation of a citywide Healthy RC program. The primary emphasis of this program is to promote a Healthy Mind, Body and Earth through the administration of programs, activities and projects that help educate the community on how to be healthier in every aspect of their lives. The Agency's primary involvement is with the Healthy Earth component of the program, and has contributed to the development of policies and strategies that advance environmental sustainability in the community and in City operations and contribute to the economic vitality of the city. • Green Business Initiatives: The Agency continued its support of sustainable efforts in organizations that promote green building, green practices and green jobs. These efforts are consistent with the initiatives of the Healthy RC Program, which promotes the establishment of a Healthy Mind, Body and Earth in Rancho Cucamonga. Through it's support of green business activities, the Agency has provided resources for efforts like the Green Valley Initiative and the Frontier Project, a 14,000-square-foot, LEED-certified demonstration building, that is a regional resource for businesses, residents, builders and developers. During this reporting period, the Agency also participated in the development of a Green Business Recognition Program, which is designed to showcase and reward Rancho Cucamonga businesses that implement environmentally sound business practices. Businesses that participate in this program are featured in the City's community newsletter, recognized on the Healthy RC website, recognized at a City Council meeting, and offered a "Healthy RC Green Business" window decal 12 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Annua/ Report 2010/11 for their business. The Agency anticipates further participation and promotion of these programs and efforts in FY 2011/12. B. Marketing and Promotions The Redevelopment Agency's primary marketing efforts are focused on the recruitment of businesses that can enhance the local economy and on promoting Rancho Cucamonga as a premier location for living, working, and recreating in the Inland Empire. Due to Rancho Cucamonga's growing number of amenities, events and activities, the Agency's marketing efforts also include the promotion of tourism to regional, national, and international visitors. • Print Advertising: As recommended in the Agency's Economic Development Strategy, the Agency continued its advertising efforts by placing ads in a number of office, industrial and retail publications during the 2010/11 Fiscal Year. These advertisements resulted in the City receiving many leads from companies who expressed interest in locating their business in Rancho Cucamonga. In an effort to highlight local venues, activities, and amenities in the City, Agency Staff also placed print and online advertisements in both local and regional tourism-related publications, promoting Rancho Cucamonga as a "Gateway to a Southern California Adventure." As a result of this effort, the Agency received numerous requests for tourism information during this reporting period. • Fun Book - In 2007, the Agency launched its new Fun Book, a publication that promotes venues, activities, and events in Rancho Cucamonga. The Fun Book is distributed to select venues in the community, including all of the hotels, Victoria Gardens, the Chamber of Commerce, and the lA/Ontario International Airport. The Fun Book is also mailed to anyone who contacts the Agency to request information about tourism in Rancho Cucamonga. Agency Staff distributed thousands of Fun Books during the FY 2010/11 reporting period, and are currently working on a third update to the publication for the upcoming fiscal year. • Tourism Marketing Program -During this reporting period, the Agency continued to implement its comprehensive travel and tourism marketing campaign that incorporates electronic and print advertising; radio advertising and spotlights; and public relations efforts. The Agency also continued to develop its relationship with its neighboring Tourism Partners to help promote and expand tourism in and around Rancho Cucamonga. This multi-faceted marketing campaign was. developed to increase the community's exposure as a travel destination and starting point for extended travel; increase revenues through marketing travel- related businesses; and increase the city's transit-oriented occupancy levels. Since the onset of this campaign, the Agency has received thousands of requests for tourism information and has experienced increases in the City's sales tax and transit occupancy tax revenues. P163 13 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Annua/ Report 2010/i1 Digital Billboard - In 2008 and 2009, the City approved two Relocation and Reconstruction Agreements that permitted the removal of 11 legal non-conforming billboards and the construction of 4 new digital billboards; two of which are located along the I-15 freeway and two which are located along the Foothill Blvd corridor. These agreements allow the Agency to advertise City-sponsored programs and events and post public service messages at no cost. During this reporting period, the City and Agency ran a total of 71 ads on all three billboards, which provided approximately 525,600 annual messages of community events and programs, cultural arts performances, and business and tourism promotional campaigns. These new digital billboards have provided tremendous benefit to the City and Agency and have also helped reduce the level of blight within the Project Area by facilitating the removal of the legal non-conforming billboards. • Community and Economic Profile: The Agency works with local economist Dr. John Husing to develop a City profile that is updated annually with current economic data and statistics, which is used for marketing and informational purposes. In 2010, Agency staff partnered with a local graphics design firm to create a new, executive-style template for the profile that includes professionally designed graphics, charts and photographs. This new design is consistent with the Agency's supplemental marketing materials and provides a uniform and professional appearance for all of the Agency's informational hand-outs. • E-mail Marketing: Agency staff continues to utilize its email marketing tools to reach local business owners, business investors, commercial real estate brokers and visitors. During this reporting period, the Agency provided thousands of subscribers with business and tourism information through the distribution of its FastTrack newsletter, Opportunities real estate bulletins, Trave! Proles and a variety of other special announcements and press releases. • Redevelopment Agency Website -The Agency launched its official website on December 1, 2008, offering businesses, residents and Rancho Cucamonga visitors a key resource for finding business, housing, education and tourism- related information in one convenient location. During this reporting period, the Agency's website has received an average of 136 visitors per day, each viewing an average of 3.5 different web pages per visit. Website visitors are primarily from the U.S. (approximately 95%), with additional visitors coming from Canada, United Kingdom, Spain, Mexico, France, Germany, Philippines and India, respectively. Throughout the year, the Agency has provided ongoing P164 14 P165 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Annua/ Report 2010/11 enhancements to this important communication tool and will continue to expand its electronic delivery of information in FY 2011/12. Inside Rancho Website: The Inside Rancho website (www. insiderancho.com) continues to be a valuable property site search tool that generates interest in properties that may otherwise be overlooked by potential business investors. This interactive website has received thousands of visits to date, and allows brokers, develo ers and site ~, _ _ . , .~ ,..~ ® ~ , f '' t m ~~ ®~ ... ^r W .~ W ` ~r~.- W . - ® - ~.. p selectors to conduct online GIS-based searches quickly and easily. The website includes site-specific demographic information based on 3, 5, 10 and 15-mile radii, and offers features that allow users to export custom reports into Microsoft Word, Excel and PDF files. Agency staff recently added additional map features to the site that incorporate the use of Google maps and street views, which allow users to conduct virtual tours of sites without having to physically drive to each property. These new virtual features are intended to help reduce street traffic and contribute to the development of a healthy and sustainable environment, which is consistent with the City's Healthy RC program initiatives. During FY 2010/11, staff also created a mobile application that allows users to access Inside Rancho site information from their handheld mobile device. Public Relations Program: The Agency's Economic Development Strategic Plan Update indicated a need to supplement current marketing activities with additional public relations support, targeted at audiences in Los Angeles and Orange counties. Hitl and Knowlton, an experienced and qualified media and public relations firm, was selected to provide these services to the Agency. They have been instrumental in assisting with the implementation of the Agency's marketing plan through the creation of media fact sheets, providing media relations support, promoting new hotel activity and tourism in the City, and pitching stories and advertorial placements to business and travel publications. The Agency will continue to work with Hill and Knowlton in promoting the City through various public relation efforts. Souvenir Shop: The Agency developed the "Rancho Cucamonga Souvenir Shop" to promote awareness of the City's "brand." Quality souvenirs have helped carry the City's name and message across the United States to a national audience, and have played an important role in marketing Rancho Cucamonga to potential visitors and business investors. Merchandise is continuously monitored, updated and advertised within the community and on the city's website and can be 15 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Annua/Report 2010/11 purchased at City Hall and at the Rancho Cucamonga Family Sports Center. • Business Outreach and Hosoitality: The Epicenter and the Rancho Cucamonga Quakes baseball team continue to play an important role in the Agency's efforts to retain and attract businesses in Rancho Cucamonga. On occasion, company representatives may receive promotional skybox tickets from the Agency, which allow them to experience the way sports and entertainment contribute to the City's quality of life. The Agency also encourages commercial real estate brokers to identify business executives that could be invited to attend a game. During the reporting fiscal year 2010/11, the Agency hosted 46 organizations in the stadium skybox, including 41 companies and 5 leaders of local organizations. • Toll-Free Phone Line: The toll-free line continues to be a valuable resource for making the Agency more accessible to its clients. This toll-free number (1-877-5- RANCHO) has been placed on marketing material and in Agency-directed advertisements. C. Capital Improvement Projects The Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Plan identifies major physical deterrents to growth due to the existence of inadequate flood control public improvements, as a well as a lack of public facilities, open spaces, and utilities which cannot be remedied by private or governmental action without redevelopment. In accordance with Health and Safety Code Section 33445, the Agency is authorized to pay all or part of the value of the land for and the cost of the installation and construction of any building, facility, structure or other improvement which is publicly owned either within or without the Project Area necessary to carry out the Redevelopment Plan and eliminate the existing conditions causing a reduction of, or lack of, proper utilization of the Project Area. As specified in Health and Safety Code 33080.1(d), the Agency has implemented capital improvement projects as described in the chart on the next page that eliminate the physical and economic blighting conditions, which includes the elimination of conditions that have led to underutilization or disuse of, or a lack of private investment in the- project area, and areas that directly impact the project area. These projects have contributed to an increase in economic development activities within the project area by creating jobs, supporting business related activities, and improving circulation in and around the City. The CRA Redevelopment Construction Jobs Calculator is a statistical tool that was developed for CRA by Time Structures, Inc. which allows the Agency to estimate the number of jobs generated to build a project and the amount businesses profited from these projects. This information is reported for each of the projects below and helps illustrate the value of Redevelopment Agencies and the ways they are boosting the local and state economy. P166 16 P167 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Annua/ Report 2010/11 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT SUMMARY (as of June 30, 2011) FUNDED PROJECTS TOTAL PROJECT COST TOTAL AGENCY CONTRIBUTION TOTAL JOBS CREATED TOTAL INCOME GENERATED Foothill Boulevard Improvements (Phases I & I I) $12,000,000 $12,000,000 l 87 $13,400,000 i Hellman Avenue Storm Drain ~, (Lower Reach Phase l) $6,750,000 $6,750,000 84 $6,600,000 East Avenue Master Plan Storm Drain $7,850,000 $7,500,000 98 $7,600,000 Corporate Yard Expansion Project $13,500,000 $6,750,000 197 $14,600,000 Pacific Electric Trail (Phase IV) $4,300,000 $2,400,000 65 $4,800,000 Fire Station #177/Demens Basin Project $3,500,000 $520,000 5 I $3,800,000 TOTAL 547,900,000 535,920,000 682 550,800,000 POTENTIAL i PROPOSED PROJECTS ON HOLD PROPOSED PROJECT COST PROPOSED AGENCY CONTRIBUTION POTENTIAL ' JOB CREATION INCOME GENERATION Foothill Boulevard Improvements (Phase III) $3,800,000 $3,800,000 59 $4,200,000 Hellman Avenue Storm Drain (Lower Reach Phases I[ & III) $7,500,000 $7,500,000 94 $7,300,000 I-15/Base Line Road Interchange $43,000,000 $31,000,000 645 $48,000,000 Upper Cucamonga Storm Drain & Hellman Avenue Improvements $3,500,000 $3,500,000 44 $3,400,000 Etiwanda Avenue Grade Separation $35,000,000 $26,000,000 445 $35,400,000 Archibald Avenue Storm Drain & Street Improvements $1,700,000 $1,400,000 2 ] $1,600,000 Haven Avenue Median Island Retrofit $4,000,000 $4,000,000 62 $4,500,000 I-15/Arrow Route interchange $90,000,000 unknown 1,143 $91,200,000 Neighborhood Park at 9`h Street and Madrone Street $4,000,000 $100,000 60 $4,300,000 Etiwanda Train De of $300,000 $150,000 5 $330,000 TOTAL 5192,800,000 577,450,000 2,578 5200,230,000 PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS Hellman Avenue Storm Drain (Lower Reach): This project is part of the City's General Storm Drain Master Plan and will provide much needed flood control services in the southwest section of the Project Area. Improvements on this project include the installation of a storm drain mainline, a catch basin, manholes and widening of the railroad track. Construction on phase I of this project is expected to be complete during the third quarter of 2011 and will provide 17 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Annua/ Repert 2010/11 necessary flood control improvements along Hellman Ave., from San Bernardino Rd. south to the railroad tracks. The first phase of this project created an additional 84 new full and part-time jobs and generated an estimated $6.6 million in statewide income. Phases II and III of this project, which would continue the flood control improvements south to the Cucamonga Creek Flood Control Channel and north along San Bernardino Rd. from Hellman Avenue to Spinel Avenue, have been put on hold due to the CRA vs. Matosantos lawsuit regarding AB 1X 26/27 and the future of Redevelopment Agency funding. Both phases of this project would create an estimated 84 new jobs and generate $7.3 million in statewide income. Foothill Boulevard Improvements: The Foothill Boulevard (Grove to Vineyard) improvement project includes median improvements, street widening, sidewalks, landscaping, a pedestrian bridge, a street archway and a Point of Interest Trailhead that will celebrate Historic Route 66 and connect the final phase of the Pacific Electric Trail route. Construction on Phase I of the project (Vineyard Avenue to the pedestrian bridge) is expected to be complete by the fourth quarter of 2011 and will greatly improve traffic circulation and safety along the City's primary retail corridor. This project created an additional 187 new full and part-time jobs during phases I & II of construction and generated an estimated $13.4 million in statewide income. Phase III of this project (east of the bridge to Grove Avenue) has been put on hold due to the CRA vs. Matosantos lawsuit regarding AB 1X 26/27 and the future of Redevelopment Agency funding. Construction on phase III of this project would create an estimated 59 new full and part-time jobs and generate $4.2 million in statewide income. • East Avenue Master Plan Storm Drain (MPSD?: The East Avenue MPSD will extend from an existing basin north of Base Line Road, south to Foothill Boulevard, and will include a tie in to the East Avenue drain from the existing Base Line storm drain west of East Avenue. Construction on this project will begin during the fourth quarter of 2011 and will create an additional 98 new full and part-time jobs and generate $7.6 million in statewide income. • Upper Cucamonga Storm Drain and Hellman Avenue Widening Improvements: This project improves the existing channel and storm drain at a point along the railroad right-of-way, west of Vineyard Avenue to Base Line Road; west along Base Line Road to Roberds Street; and north westerly on Roberds Street to Amethyst Street. Phases I and II of this project, which included the widening of Hellman Avenue south of Base Line Road to Palo Alto Street, and the installation P168 18 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Annua/Repoit2O1O/11 of a new pipe from Vineyard Avenue to Hellman Avenue, was completed during the second quarter of 2008. The design process for Phase 111 was completed in FY 2009/10 and construction is currently on hold due to the CRA vs. Matosantos lawsuit regarding AB 1X 26/27. This project will provide much needed flood protection for businesses and residences that are located within the project area and will bring an estimated 44 new jobs to the community and generate $3.4 million in statewide income. • I-15/Base Line Interchange: This project is currently in the Project Report and Design phase. Both the project report and design are being worked on concurrently and are expected to be complete by the first quarter of 2012. This project will expand the existing on and off-ramps at the I-15 Freeway and Base Line Road and is a much needed improvement resulting from the economic growth that has occurred in the City during the last 10 years. The construction phase of this project is expected to create an estimated 645 new full and part- time jobs and generate an additional $48 million in statewide income. Construction on this project has been put on hold due to the CRA vs. Matosantos lawsuit regarding AB 1X 26/27 and the future of Redevelopment Agency funding. • Archibald Avenue Storm Drain & Street Improvements: This project will provide much needed flood control protection to the project area and includes pavement rehabilitation and the installation of a storm drain along Archibald Avenue, from Base Line Road south to Foothill Boulevard. This project is currently in the design phase, with construction anticipated for the second quarter of 2012, if funding becomes available. Construction on this project would generate an estimated 21 new jobs and generate $1.6 million in statewide income. Construction on this project is dependent on the outcome of the CRA vs. Matosantos lawsuit regarding AB 1X 26/27 and the future of Redevelopment Agency funding. • Etiwanda Avenue Grade Separation -The Etiwanda Avenue grade separation is a major infrastructure project that will improve vehicular traffic and enhance safety for all travelers by separating train traffic from vehicle traffic along Etiwanda Avenue. This project is currently in the preliminary phase and has undergone surveying, soils testing, and the development of base plans, and is waiting on funding to begin the design phase. Construction on this project is expected to create an estimated 445 new jobs and generate $35 million in statewide income. The future of this project is dependent on the outcome of the CRA vs. Matosantos lawsuit regarding AB 1X 26/27 and the future of Redevelopment Agency funding. • Haven Avenue Median Island Retrofit -This project would provide retrofit improvements to the median islands along Haven Avenue from 4th Street north to the 210 Freeway. Proposed improvements include a change in the median island grade and the installation of cobblestone and low water landscaping to reduce the water consumption needs currently required .by the existing landscape. This P169 19 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Annua/ Report 2010/11 project would create an estimated 62 new jobs and generate $4.5 million in statewide income. Construction on this project is dependent on the outcome of the CRA vs. Matosantos lawsuit regarding AB 1X 26/27 and the future of Redevelopment Agency funding. • I-15/Arrow Route Interchange: In 2008 the Agency began acquiring right-of-way for a proposed interchange at Arrow Route and the I-15 Freeway. This project would add an on and off ramp in the City's industrial area, allowing for improved access to and from the freeway, and reduce traffic congestion at adjacent interchanges. This project has been put on hold indefinitely due to the 2010 and 2011 ERAF takes of Redevelopment Agency funding in 2009. Construction on this project would have created an estimated 1,143 new full and part-time jobs and generate $91.2 million in statewide income. COMMUNITY & CULTURAL FACILITIES Corporate Yard Expansion: In 2008, Staff began working on a master plan design to expand the City's Corporate Yard; a facility that provides necessary services to help prevent blight within the project area. The master plan includes the development of a new administration/crew building, a new household hazardous waste collection facility, and five acres of site improvements. Construction on this project began during the second quarter of 2011 and is expected to be complete by the second quarter of 2012. This project has created an additional 197 new full and part-time jobs and has generated $14.6 million in statewide revenues. • Pacific Electric Trail: The Pacific Electric Trail follows the east-west route of the historic Pacific Electric Railroad and has a paved section for pedestrians and bicyclists, and a softer section of decomposed granite for joggers and equestrian riders. Phases I, II and III of this project were completed in October 2007, connecting the City's first five mile centerpiece of the trail from Amethyst Avenue to Etiwanda Avenue. Phase V of the project was completed during the P170 20 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Annua/Report 1010/11 first quarter of 2009 and connects the trail from Etiwanda Avenue east to the I-15 Freeway. Construction on phase IV of this project, which will connect the trail from Amethyst Avenue west to Grove Avenue, is currently underway and is expected to be complete by the fourth quarter of 2011 with the opening of the new Foothill Boulevard pedestrian bridge. Construction on phase IV of this project created an additional 65 new full and part-time jobs and generated $4.8 million in statewide income. • Neighborhood Park ~ 9~h Street & Madrone Avenue: In 2005 the Agency acquired 3.4 acres of land as part of an anticipated affordable housing project. The land was zoned as open space for the purpose of developing a much needed neighborhood park in the southwest Cucamonga area. Today, the property remains undeveloped. Agency staff assisted the Community Services Department in applying for a grant to develop a park on the site and hosted five neighborhood meetings during the grant application process to solicit feedback from residents on how the park should be developed. In the first quarter of 2011, the City was awarded the grant for $3.9 million to fund the design and construction of the park. The Agency intends to fund the demolition of the existing property structures prior to construction. This project is currently in the design and environmental report phase; however the demolition of the existing property structures has been put on hold due to the CRA vs. Matosantos lawsuit regarding AB 1X 26/27 and the future of Redevelopment Agency funding. Construction on this project is anticipated to create an estimate 60 new full and part-time jobs and generate $4.3 million in statewide income. • Historic Preservation: There are many historical resources in the Project Area that the agency has supported over the years, including the Chaffey-Garcia House, Isles House and the Oral History Program. During this reporting period, the Agency and the City's Planning Department finalized negotiations with the San Bernardino Association of Governments (SANBAG) to purchase a half acre parcel and modify an existing long term lease on the adjacent 3.5 acre parcel for the acquisition and restoration of the historic Etiwanda Train Depot property. The Depot is located in the heart of the proposed Etiwanda Historical District and could operate as a museum and trail head for the Pacific Electric Trail. Staff is currently gathering bids for project restoration, which include roof repair, lead paint and asbestos removal, stucco repair, connection to the sewer line, and plumbing and electrical repairs. This project would create an estimated 5 new . jobs and generate $330,000 in statewide income. Construction on this project is currently on hold due to the CRA vs. Matosantos lawsuit regarding AB 1X 26/27 and the future of Redevelopment Agency funding. FIRE & PUBLIC SAFETY FACILITIES • Fire Station #177/Demens Basin Proiect: In October 2008, the Fire Protection District approved a Purchase and Sale Agreement for the acquisition of 1.16 P171 21 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Annua/Repvrt2010/11 acres of land with San Bernardino County Flood Control for the development of a Fire Station. The Agency's involvement in this project was limited to land preparation and infill of the Demens Basin so the property would be developable. It is anticipated that the fire station will be complete by the fourth quarter of 2011. The construction phase of this project created an additional 51 jobs and generated $3.8 million in statewide income. • Relocation of San Bernardino Rd. Fire Station #172: In the first quarter of 2009, the Agency culminated its year-long search for property needed for the relocation and reconstruction of the San Bernardino Road Fire Station #172 with the identification and acquisition of two parcels. The Agency successfully acquired one of the two properties at a foreclosure auction, and the other property through private sale. During this reporting period, the Agency assisted the Fire Protection District with preparation of the property ,for construction (demolition of existing properties, rough grading, etc.). This process will continue throughout FY 2011 /12. D. Workforce Housing The Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Plan identifies a lack of decent and affordable housing to meet the needs of the community's low and moderate income families, and establishes a goal to provide for, improve and maintain the city's supply of affordable housing that supports alive/work environment for Rancho Cucamonga's workforce. The Agency's workforce housing projects provide home ownership and rental opportunities to households at or below 90% of area median income. As specified in Health and Safety Code Section 33334.3(d), the Agency has determined that the administrative expenses approved in the fiscal year 2010/11 budget are necessary for the production, improvement, and preservation of very low, low and moderate income housing. HOME OWNERSHIP • First Time Homebuvers Program: The Redevelopment Agency contracts with Neighborhood Housing Services of the Inland Empire (NHSIE) to administer the First Time Homebuyers Program. NHSIE is anon-profit organization that specializes in mortgage assistance programs for lower income families. The First Time Homebuyers Program provides up to $80,000 in the form of a silent second mortgage to qualifying low and moderate-income families for the purchase of their first home. During this reporting period, the Agency continued the requirement that participants must purchase a foreclosed property in order to help reduce the number of distressed properties in the community and minimize their potential to create blight. To date, his program has assisted 117 families with the purchase their first home. Agency staff continued with its annual re- certification process during this reporting period to verify that all homeowners P172 22 P173 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Annua/ Report 2010/11 participating in this program are currently residing in their property. This program is currently on hold due to the CRA vs. Matosantos lawsuit regarding AB 1X 26/27 and the future of Redevelopment Agency funding. RENTAL OPPORTUNITIES The Agency continues to monitor workforce family and senior housing projects that are operated by National Community Renaissance-CORE (formerly Southern California Housing Development Corporation), Northtown Housing Development Corporation (NHDC), Orange Housing and LINC Housing. Affordable rents for family and senior housing range from $345 - $985 for aone-bedroom unit and $410 - $1,190 for atwo- bedroom unit, as compared to market rate rents that average $1,254 for all multi-family units in Rancho Cucamonga. . Family Housing Partners & Developments LINC Housing • Pepperwood Apartments - 228 affordable units -affordability covenants expire in 2105. NATIONAL CORE Rancho Verde Village Apartments - 104 affordable units -affordability covenants in perpetuity; not less than 99 years. • Rancho Verde East Apartments - 40 affordable units -affordability covenants are in perpetuity; not less than 99 years. • Mountainside Apartments - 188 affordable units -affordability covenants are in perpetuity; not less than 99 years. • Monterey Village Apartments - 110 affordable units -affordability covenants are in perpetuity; not less than 99 years. • Sunset Heights Apartments - 116 affordable units - affordability covenants are in perpetuity; not less than 99 years. • Sycamore Springs Apartments - 96 affordable units -affordability covenants are in perpetuity; not less than 99 years. • Villagio at Route 66 Apartments - 131 affordable units -affordability covenants are in perpetuity; not less than 99 years. 23 P174 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Annua/ Report 2010/11 NORTNTOWN HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION Villa del Norte Apartments - 87 affordable unifs- affordability covenants expire in 2051. Las Casitas Apartments - 14 affordable unifs -affordability covenants expire in 2027. Senior Housing NATIONAL CORE • Heritage Pointe Apartments - 48 affordable units -affordability covenants expire in 2091. NORTHTOWN HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION Olen Jones Apartments - 96 affordable units - affordability covenants are in perpetuity; not less then 99 years. ORANGE HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION • Vi!!a Pacifica Apartments - 158 affordable units -affordability covenants expire in 2027. Site Visits: On an annual basis, staff will visit all of the Agency's multifamily complexes with affordability covenants to inspect the physical condition of the properties. Site visits for this reporting period took place in October and November of 2010. These visits included a general walk-around of the complex to allow for visual inspection of the property, and an inspection of several randomly selected units, which provided staff with an opportunity to conduct audits of residents' ongoing eligibility. NEW PROJECT DEVELOPMENT San Sevaine Villas: In August 2005, the Agency approved a loan agreement for $40.7 million with Northtown Housing Development Corporation for land acquisition and construction of 223 affordable one-bedroom, two-bedroom and three-bedroom family units at the southwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and East Avenue. An initial disbursement of $8.3 million was made to acquire the 14- acre parcel and provide reimbursement of pre-development expenses to the developer. Construction on this project was completed in the first quarter of 2011 and the complex is now 100% leased. Based on the information obtained by the CRA jobs calculator, this project created an additional 524 new full and part-time jobs during its construction phase and generated $40.2 million in statewide income. 24 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Annua/Report1O10/11 ADDITIONAL HOUSING PROGRAMS • Mobile Home Rental Assistance Program: In June 2008, the City Council approved a Mobile Home Rental Assistance Program that provided up to $50 per month towards the rent of a mobile home space. Families that were eligible for this program were at, or below, 60% of the county median income, and paying 30% or more of their income on housing. Staff reevaluated the program in 2009, in an effort to provide additional help to the mobile home residents, and increased the monthly assistance from $50 to $100, and reduced the 30% requirement to 25%. During this reporting period, staff worked with each of the mobile home parks to qualify 50 additional residents for participation in the rental assistance program. This program is currently assisting 160 eligible mobile home residents, and staff will continue to reach out to the mobile home parks to increase the level of participation from the residents. • Mobile Home Accord -The Mobile Home Accord was implemented to stabilize the rents of mobile home rental spaces in Rancho Cucamonga. This program was previously monitored by the City Manager's Office and was transferred to the Redevelopment Agency in 2009. Agency staff serves as a liaison between the mobile home park owners and the park residents. The Accord was renewed in 2008 and is valid until 2015. Staff continues to review and verify rent increase submittals for the eight parks and facilitates resolutions between residents and management on various park issues. • Foreclosure Prevention and Assistance Workshops -During this reporting period, Agency staff partnered with Senator Bob button's office to host its fourth Foreclosure Prevention and Assistance Workshop since 2008. This year's workshop brought lenders, real estate professionals, government agencies and non-profit groups together to offer homeowners valuable information and assistance to help keep them in their homes. Hundreds of homeowners from all throughout the region participated in this years event and many of them received loan modifications on site. Staff has plans to host additional workshops in the future and will continue to evaluate other opportunities to assist homeowners that are facing foreclosure. • San Bernardino County Homeless Partnership: In January 2008, the County of San Bernardino formulated a partnership that coordinates services and resources in an attempt to bring an end to homelessness in the County. The Agency's Housing Programs Manager represents the City on the County's Homeless Partnership Committee. During this reporting period, the Committee finalized its 10-year strategic plan to end homelessness in San Bernardino County. Portions of the plan are currently being implemented as county funding becomes available. • Neighborhood Stabilization Program (NSP): In 2009, the City received approximately $2 million in federal funding through the Neighborhood P175 25 P176 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Annua/Report 2010/11 Stabilization Program (NSP). During this reporting period, the Agency assisted the City in utilizing its NSP funds to assist low and moderate income families through the City's First-Time Homebuyers Program. NSP funds were also used to purchase three Rancho Cucamonga homes that were in foreclosure, which will be rehabilitated and sold to families participating in the First-Time Homebuyers Program. The remainder of the City's NSP funds will be used to assist local nonprofit agencies that provide safe and affordable housing, such as House of Ruth and Habitat for Humanity. Crime Free Multi-Family Housing Program: The Agency partners with the Rancho Cucamonga Police Department to facilitate participation from its housing partners in the City's Crime Free Multi-Family Housing Program. This program provides multi-family property owners and managers with instruction on how to administer the eviction process, establish fair tenant screening, provide a safe living environment for all tenants, and improve working relationships with law enforcement. REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS California Redevelopment Law imposes certain requirements for agencies to produce affordable housing units within Redevelopment Project Areas. These requirements are more commonly referred to as the "30 percent Requirement" and the "15 percent Requirement". 30 Percent Requirement California Health and Safety Code Section 33413(b)(1)requires that at least 30% of all new or substantially rehabilitated dwelling units developed by an Agencv (not units developed or rehabilitated by developers with Agency assistance) must be available at affordable housing costs and occupied by persons and families of low or moderate income (the 30 percent requirement). At least 50 percent of those units must be available at affordable housing costs to, and occupied by, persons and families of very low income. The 30 percent requirement is determined by the aggregate number of all new and substantially rehabilitated dwelling units developed by the Agency, and are not calculated for each individual housing project. The Redevelopment Agency's policy has been to use 20% Housing Set-aside funds to work with private non-profit developers to develop and/or preserve affordable housing units. Therefore, the Redevelopment Agency has not directly constructed or substantially rehabilitated units within the Project Area. 15 Percent Requirement California Health and Safety Code 33413(b)(1)(2)(A)(i) requires that at least 15% of all new and substantially rehabilitated dwelling units developed within the proiect area by public or private persons other than the Redevelopment Agency (including those entities 26 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Annua/Report2O1O/11 such as non-profit developers receiving Agency assistance) sh_ all be available at affordable housing costs and occupied by persons and families of low or moderate income (the 15 percent requirement). Not less than 40% of the dwelling units required to be at affordable housing costs are required to be available and occupied by very low income households. The 15 percent requirement is determined by the aggregate number of all new and substantially rehabilitated dwelling units within a project area and is not calculated for each individual housing project. Redevelopment Law (Health & Safety Code Section 33413(b)(1)(2)(A)(ii) provides that under certain conditions, a Redevelopment Agency may adopt a Resolution to determine that units produced outside of the Project Area with Agency assistance may be applied to the Project Area production requirement on a 2-for-1 basis. In other words, each 2 units produced outside the Project Area with Agency assistance and restricted by Agency Regulatory Agreements may count as 1 unit toward the production requirement. As part of the Redevelopment Plan, the Agency determined the project area benefit and authorized units produced by the Agency outside of the Project Area to count toward Project Area production requirements. The Housing Element of the 2001 General Plan estimates that 18,368 residential units will be constructed within the Redevelopment Project Area at build-out. Therefore, under the 15 percent production requirement, prior to the expiration of the Redevelopment Plan, the Agency will need to provide 2,755 units affordable to, and occupied by, persons and families of low or moderate income. At least 40% (1,102) of these units are required to be affordable to, and occupied by, very low Income households (50% and less of the area median Income). In meeting the Agency's 15 percent production requirement, 2,069 affordable units have been produced to date. Of these units, 891 (43%) have been restricted as affordable to, and occupied by, very low income households. The chart on the next page demonstrates the Agency's progress in meeting its production requirements. P177 27 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Annua/Report 1010/11 E. Workforce Housing Unit Summary REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY 15% HOUSING PRODUCTION REQUIRMENT* (as of June 30, 201 I) VERY LOW LOW MODERATE TOTAL 50% & SUBSIDIZED PROJECT TENURE LESS 51-80% 81-120% UNITS Villa del Norte Rental 36 S 1 0 87 Las Casitas Rental 14 0 0 14 Rancho Verde Village* Rental SO 36 18 104 Rancho Verde East * Rental 19 21 0 40 Mountainside Rental 77 38 73 I8$ Montere Villa a Rental S6 28 26 I10 Sycamore Springs* Rental 60 36 0 96 Pe erwood Rental 99 129 0 228 Villa Pacifica * Rental 127 31 0 IS8 Heritage Pointe** Rental 24 24 0 48 Olen Jones Sr. Apartments* Rental 92 4 0 96 San Sevaine Villas* Renal 110 SS 58 223 Sunset Hei =hts* Rental 60 S6 0 116 Villa io at Route 66 Rental 66 65 0 131 Ownershi Units (NHDC) Owner 0 0 48 48 First Time Homebu ers Owner 1 20 96 117 Total 891 594 319 1804 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY BOND PROJECTS as of June 30, 201 I PROJECT TENURE VERY LOW MODERATE TOTAL LOW SUBSIDIZED UNITS Parkview Place -Terra Vista Rental 0 30 0 30 Mountain View -Terra Vista Rental 0 S4 0 54 S camore Terrace -Terra Vista Rental 0 26 0 26 Waterbrook Rental 0 76 0 76 Ever°reen -Terra Vista Rental 0 79 0 79 County Bond Project Total 0 26S 0 26S CUMULATIVE TOTAL 891 859 319 2069 CUMULATIVE PERCENTAGE 43% 42% 15% (unit numbers are estimates) Based on 2001 General Plan projection of 18,368 residential units in the project area at buildout; 2,755 affordable units will be re uired to meet Redevelo ment Project Area re uirements. * These units were produced by the Agency outside the Project Area and have been calculated as I unit for each 2 units produced in compliance with Health & Safety Code Subsection 33413(2(ii). P178 28 P179 F. Property Report As specified in Section 33080.1 (e) of the California Health and Safety Code, the Agency acknowledges that it owns and is holding for resale the following properties as described in the table below. REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY PROPERTY CURRENTLY OWNED As of June 30 2009 Northwest Corner of Base Line Rd. and Da Creek Blvd. 1089-031-15 16 & 35 15.18 Acres 9561 San Bernardino Rd. 0208-151-17-0000 0.56 Acres 9547 San Bernardino Rd. 0208-151-07-0000 0.82 Acres SEC of Church St. and Arbor Lane 0227-452-46-0000 5.4 Acres NEC of Civic Center Dr, and Law and Justice access road 0208-353-09-0000 1 Acre NWC of Utica and Civic Center Dr. 0208-353-06-0000 1 Acre Base Line & I-15 Interchan a 0227-131-59-0000 125,888 s . ft 9`~ cYt Madrone 0207-262-57-0000 3.4 Acres G. Fiscal Statement In accordance with Section 33080.5 of the California Health and Safety Code, a fiscal analysis of the Agency is shown on the attached Statement of Indebtedness. Briefly, the total outstanding indebtedness for the Project Area, as of June 30, 2011, was $1,642,162,217. This total debt is a combination of loans from the City of Rancho Cucamonga; interest on the loans; obligations under the pass-through agreements with the County of San Bernardino, Chino Basin Municipal Water District, Cucamonga Valley Water District, Chaffey, Central, Cucamonga, and Etiwanda School Districts; regional facilities payments; and payments on the tax allocation bond issues. The total amount of payments the Agency paid on the existing indebtedness from July 1, 2010 to June 30, 2011 was $97,315,055. In the reporting fiscal year 2010/11, the Agency received a total of $98,828,154 in tax increment revenue. The majority of this revenue is used to pay existing debt obligations. The Agency is also required to set aside 20% of the gross tax increment allocation pursuant to Section 33334.2 of the California Health and Safety Code, which totaled $19,765,631 during this reporting period. In addition, the Inland Empire Utilities Agency and Cucamonga Valley Water Districts receive direct payments from the Agency when tax increment is received. Revenues are received pursuant to apass-through agreement executed at the time the Project Area was formed. The pass-through payment is used by the districts to meet capital and bonded indebtedness obligations. In fiscal year 2010111, a total of $3,302,954 was 29 CIfY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Annua/Report 1010/11 paid to this district pursuant to Section 33401(b) of the California Health and Safety Code. The Agency also paid a total of $8,920,721 in fiscal year 2010/11 to the Fire Protection District, pursuant to an agreement with the District dated April 22, 1992. In accordance with SB 211, the Agency paid a total of $658,720 to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, the Inland Empire Joint Resource Conservation District, and the Chino Basin Water District. Furthermore, pursuant to an agreement dated June 1, 1989, the Agency paid a total of $6,028,588 to Chaffey Joint Union High School District, Cucamonga School District, Etiwanda School District, and Central School District in fiscal year 2010/11. In accordance with SB 211, the Agency also paid a total of $492,748 to the Chaffey Community College District in fiscal year 2010/11. The Agency acknowledges that no loans equal or exceeding $50,000 were found to be in default in fiscal year 2010/11. H. Time Limits In accordance with Health & Safety Code Section 33080.1(8), below is a list of the fiscal years the Agency expects each of the following time limits to expire: 1. The original time limit for the commencement for eminent domain proceedings to acquire property within the project area expired on August 13, 1999. However, Amendment 3 to the Redevelopment Plan reinstated the Agency's authority to acquire real property by eminent domain for APN 229-031-47 & 48 only until 2014. 2. The time limit for the establishment of loans, advances, and indebtedness to finance the Redevelopment project expires on January 1, 2014. 3. The time limit for the effectiveness of the Redevelopment Plan expires on December 23, 2024. 4. The time limit to repay indebtedness with the proceeds from property taxes expires on December 23, 2034. IV. Comparison of the Actual 2010/11 with the Goals 2009/10 Annual Report Achievements of Fiscal Year Outlined in the Fiscal Year The Annual Report for fiscal year 2009/10 identified the 2010/11 work program goals consistent with projects prioritized in the Redevelopment Plan. Thus, projects that began during the last year will receive further implementation and other projects will be considered as they relate to the overall goals set forth in the Redevelopment Plan, which include: P180 30 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Annua/ Report 1010/11 ^' Protect and promote the sound development and redevelopment of blight, as defined in Section 33030 through 33032 of the California Health and Safety Code; ^' Assure that projects in the Project Area provide assistance in alleviating physical and economic barriers to development in the Project Area; ^~ Assure that projects in the Project Area provide for balanced and orderly development; ^' Assure that projects in the Project Area are in conformance with the City's General Plan; and ^' Provide for assurance of adequate tax increment to help finance improvements in the Project Area. Specific work program goals identified for the 2010/11 fiscal year included six focused areas: Commercial and Industrial Economic Enhancement; Marketing and Promotions, Capital Improvements, Community and Cultural Facilities, Fire Facilities Programs and Workforce Housing. As indicated in Section III of this report, considerable progress has been made in these areas. The Agency will continue to take a proactive approach to mitigate economic deterioration by assisting in the establishment of new businesses and the creation of new jobs through the support of economic strategies that help eliminate blight in the community. The opening of Victoria Gardens in 2004 and Bass Pro Shops in 2007 have had a significant economic impact on the community, providing over 3,500 permanent and part-time jobs for local residents and generating over a half million square feet of additional commercial development on adjacent properties. Both projects have provided a substantial increase to the city's annual sales tax revenue through visitors shopping and dining in the City and additional transit occupancy tax revenue from the overnight hotel stays of guests traveling. from throughout the region to visit southern California's only Bass Pro Shop. Agency staff continues to work with Forest City Development to expand new retail and office opportunities at Victoria Gardens. The continued implementation of the Third Party Electrical Certification Program, Banner Sponsorship Program, Business Appreciation Week and Business Visitation Programs. has helped the Agency maintain a positive relationship with its business community and maintain their success in Rancho Cucamonga. Through its ongoing business relocation and expansion efforts, including the new Rancho Advantage Program that helps facilitate the pre-submittal planning process, the Agency has also supported a number of Rancho Cucamonga companies in expanding their businesses here in the City and assisted incoming businesses with the opening their new facilities in Rancho Cucamonga. The Agency's partnerships with the Rancho Cucamonga Chamber of Commerce, Inland P181 31 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Annua/RepoK2010/11 Empire Economic Partnership, Small Business Development Center, National Association of Office and Industrial Properties, and the International Council of Shopping Centers have helped maintain a comprehensive economic development effort with a strong regional base. Thousands of business contacts have been made and several site relocations and business expansions were assisted. In addition, the Inside Rancho Website kept the commercial real estate community aware of the quality of development, growth and continuing opportunities that are available in the City. Agency staff has maintained a strong focus on workforce development by partnering with other agencies to implement programs that assist local residents in their job search efforts. Agency staff has continued to work with its West End Workforce Opportunity Resource Committee (WE-WORC) partners to enhance its online career awareness website (CareerQuest.TV) that provides information to high school and college students about career paths in industries within the Inland Empire. The Agency has also continued its partnership in two local job fairs (David Drier and the Inland Empire West End Job Fair) that assisted in providing local jobs for local residents. The Agency made considerable progress in implementing the Wayfinding Directional Guide Sign Project. Staff worked extensively to develop a uniform sign template that reflects the image of Rancho Cucamonga and creates a criterion to determine the local facilities and destinations that should be included on the signage. These signs have helped direct visitors and residents to places of interest within the community and have been a valuable tool for promoting tourism in Rancho Cucamonga. Staff has also continued its partnerships with Lamar Advertising and General Outdoor Advertising to promote City-sponsored events and programs on the four new digital billboards in the community. The Agency continued its print advertising efforts by placing ads in a variety of journals and site selection publications in order to attract high-tech companies and corporate office users to the City. The Agency's email marketing efforts have been well received by the public, and have worked to keep business and industry partners up-to-date on business-related news and information in the City. The Agency has continued to work with a pubic relations firm to implement a business attraction and retention public relations media strategy, which has been very effective in generating interest from businesses looking to relocate to the Inland Empire. This public relations firm has also worked to promote new hotel activity and tourism in the City, and pitch stories about the City to airline and travel magazines. The addition of the Agency's travel and tourism marketing campaign, which incorporates advertising, public relations efforts, and partnerships to promote tourism in and around Rancho Cucamonga, has been very effective in increasing the community's exposure as a Southern California travel destination. These efforts have resulted in thousands of requests for tourism information from individuals from all throughout the world. Staff continues to promote Agency programs and advertise business, housing, education and tourism-related information on its Redevelopment Agency website. The Agency has also continued to market and promote awareness of the City's brand by P182 32 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Annua/Report2O10/11 providing, local and perspective companies with an opportunity to attend a Quakes game at the Epicenter and by distributing merchandise through its Souvenir Shop that carry's the City's name and message to a broader audience. The Agency's marketing resources, including the Visions Newsletter, Fun Book and toll-free phone line, have continued to be valuable tools for promoting Rancho Cucamonga as a great place to live, work and play. Extensive work has been carried out with regard to capital improvement projects in the project area. Phases I & II of the Foothill Boulevard improvement project are nearing completion and have helped improve traffic circulation along the City's primary retail/commercial corridor and revitalize the western portion of the project area. The I- 15/Base Line Road interchange project is currently underway, with the design and project report phase expected to be complete by the first quarter of 2012. The completion of the first two phases of the upper Cucamonga storm drain has helped to relieve flooding and encourage private investment in the southwest portion of the project area. Design on the third phase of this project was completed in FY 2009/10, and construction is pending the receipt of additional funding. Construction on phase I and the design on phase II of the Hellman Avenue storm drain (lower reach) were completed during this reporting period. Staff also completed the design phase of the East Avenue Storm Drain, with construction scheduled to begin in the fourth quarter of 2011. Construction on the Corporate Yard expansion project began during the second quarter of 2011 and is expected to be complete in the second quarter of 2012. The completion of Phases I, II, III and V of the Pacific Electric Trail have helped improve recreation amenities both within and around the project area. Construction is nearing completion on Phase IV of the trail, which will connect the trail from Amethyst Avenue west to Grove Street and complete the 7-mile segment in Rancho Cucamonga. The Agency made considerable progress with the Community Services Department in securing a $3.9 million grant for the construction of a Neighborhood Park at 9`h Street and Madrone Avenue. The park is currently in the design phase, with construction anticipated to begin in FY 2011/12. Staff also continued its work with the Planning Department and San Bernardino Association of Governments (SANBAG) to complete a lease agreement for acquiring and rehabilitating the Historic Etiwanda Train Depot Property. Staff continued to work with the Fire District on the infill of the Demens Basin and the construction of Fire Station #177, which is scheduled to be complete during the fourth quarter of 2011. The Agency also assisted the Fire Protection District with identifying a site for the relocation of Fire Station #172 and preparing the property for construction (demolition of existing properties, rough grading, etc.) The Agency's is continuing to work toward achieving its affordable housing goals by providing over 2000 affordable covenants within several existing multi-family complexes P183 33 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Annua/Report 2010/11 that have been substantially rehabilitated and upgraded to a higher physical standard; implementing a first-time homebuyer program for low income households; and developing new affordable multi-family and senior complexes. The Agency continued to promote its First Time Homebuyer Program, which recently shifted its focus to require participants to purchase homes that are bank owned or in foreclosure. The Agency also continued to implement its mobile home rental assistance program and supervise of the Mobile Home Accord program to help keep rents affordable in the City's mobile home parks. The Agency hosted its fourth Foreclosure Prevention Workshops to assist local residents that are on the verge of losing their homes to foreclosure, and also secured federal funding to assist first-time homebuyers with the purchase of foreclosed or abandoned homes in the City. Construction was completed in the first quarter of 2011 on the San Sevine Villas housing project, which provided an additional 223 one and two-bedroom affordable units. Staff also continues to monitor the Agency's existing housing investments through its Site Visitation Program, which allows staff to inspect the physical conditions of the buildings. V. Work Program Goals for Fiscal Year 2011/12 The following is a summary of the economic development, capital improvement, and workforce housing projects and goals anticipated for implementation during the 2011/12 fiscal year to help eliminate blight in the community. A. Commercial and Industrial Economic Enhancement Programs • Victoria Gardens: Agency staff will continue to work with Forest City Development on expanding new retail and office opportunities at the regional center located north of Foothill Boulevard and west of the I-15 Freeway. • Healthy RC Program: The Agency will continue to assist with the ongoing implementation of a citywide Healthy RC program. The Agency's primary involvement will remain with the Healthy Earth component of the program, which contributes to the development of policies and strategies that advance environmental sustainability and contributes to the City's economic vitality. • Third Party Electrical Certification Program: The Agency will continue to identify new companies to assist through this program. Staff will also evaluate ways to expand the type of assistance this program provides by addressing the changing needs of businesses within the community. • Economic Development Banner Program: The Agency will continue to implement its Economic Development Banner Program to encourage community pride and attract customers to the City's retail/commercial corridor along Foothill P184 34 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Annua/Report 2010/11 Boulevard. • Community and Economic Profile: The Agency will continue to work to develop current economic data for the production of the City's Community and Economic Profile. This document will be further developed to use as a marketing tool and included in the marketing packet. • Directional Guide Sign Program: The Agency will continue to implement its Directional Guide Sign Program to provide directional assistance to attractions in the community. Staff will work together to identify any new community destinations that may be eligible to receive directional signage based on the program criteria. • Small Business Development Center: The Agency will continue to support the Inland Empire Small Business Development Center to provide free business counseling to local companies and residents that are interested in starting their own companies in Rancho Cucamonga. This program has been implemented with the support of the Rancho Cucamonga Chamber of Commerce. Business Appreciation Week: The Agency will continue to implement activities during the first week in May in order to show its appreciation to the Rancho Cucamonga's business community. Activities will include sponsoring the Chamber of Commerce's annual business golf tournament and reception and hosting the annual City business appreciation night mixer and Quakes baseball game at the Epicenter. • Rancho Advantage: The Agency will continue to implement its Rancho Advantage Program as a way to assist and advise new and expanding companies on their individual site-specific building and tenant improvement requirements. • Business Relocation/Expansion Assistance: The Agency will continue to assist potential new and existing companies with their relocation, expansion and consolidation efforts. • Rancho Cucamonga Chamber of Commerce Partnership: The Agency will continue to jointly promote economic development with the Chamber of Commerce under a Cooperative Agreement. Agency staff will continue to attend the Chamber's weekly networking meetings, participate in local grand opening and ribbon cutting ceremonies and support other Chamber events and activities in order to show its commitment to the Chambers business retention and expansion efforts. • International Council of Shopping Centers (ICSC): Staff will continue to participate in the ICSC Western Division Conference in San Diego to promote retail opportunities at retail venues in the City, such as Victoria Gardens and P185 35 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Annua/ Report 2010/11 other community shopping centers. • Inland Empire Economic Partnership: The Agency will continue to participate with the Inland Empire Economic Partnership (IEEP) in marketing programs aimed at attracting new companies to the region. Agency participation includes providing staff support for conferences and trade shows and assisting with site searches for business relocations and film locations. • Green Business Initiatives: Agency staff will continue to implement and promote its green business initiatives and activities, such as the Healthy RC Program and the Green Business Recognition Program. The Agency will also continue its partnership with the Inland Valley Economic Partnership on the Green Valley Initiative in an effort to attract green industry companies to the Inland Empire, which could result in the creation of thousands of new jobs within the green industries. • Business Visitations: The Agency will continue to establish and maintain contact with the business community and pursue an aggressive outreach schedule to establish new relationships with local businesses. Staff will maintain contacts with referral agencies such as SBDC, IEEP, Chaffey College, utility companies and other permit assistance and business development agencies. Inside Rancho Website: The.Agency will continue to enhance its site selection website and evaluate ways to provide additional virtual features that will make the site more user-friendly for visitors. This site continues to be a valuable tool that helps generate interest in properties throughout Rancho Cucamonga. Workforce Development: Agency staff will continue to work with its West End Workforce Opportunity Resource Committee (WE-WORC) partners to enhance its online career awareness website (CareerQuest.TV) which provides valuable information to high school and college students about career paths related to industries and companies within the Inland Empire. • Job Fairs: The Agency will continue to participate in local and regional job fairs to help unemployed residents find jobs within the region. In October 2011, the Agency will partner with several neighboring cities and local legislators to host the third annual Inland Empire West End Job Fair. This event is anticipated to draw over 100 local employers and offer an estimated 2000 jobs to local job seekers. • International Trade: Staff will continue to identify new opportunities to implement international trade programs, such as the Latin American Connection, and explore other world markets that may be good candidates for U.S. exporting. P186 36 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Annua/Repart2010/11 B. Marketing and Promotions • Print Advertising: The Agency will continue to advertise in Journals and site selection publications that will attract high-tech companies and corporate office users as stated in the Agency's Economic Strategy. The Agency will continue to identify ways to engage in joint venture advertising with neighboring cities and its local tourism partners to market the Inland Empire as a prime business market. • Fun Book: The Agency will continue to update and distribute its Fun Book to promote venues, activities and events in Rancho Cucamonga. • Tourism Marketing Program: The Agency will continue to expand its tourism marketing program to further enhance and increase tourism in the City. Staff will also continue developing its relationships with its local Tourism Partners to help promote and expand tourism-related activities in and around Rancho Cucamonga. • E-Mail Marketing: Current business-related news and information will be provided and maintained on the Agency's web pages and through e-mail/web-based technologies, such as FastTrack, Opportunities, and other various tourism pieces. • Digital Billboard: The Agency will continue to work with Lamar Advertising and General Outdoor Advertising to advertise City events and programs on the digital billboards along the I-15 freeway and Foothill Boulevard. These digital billboards have provided valuable new marketing opportunities for the City and Agency and have helped reduce blight within the Project Area. • Redevelopment Agencv Website: Staff will continue to promote Agency programs and advertise business, housing, education and tourism-related information on the Redevelopment Agency website. • Public Relations Program: Staff will continue to work with the public relations firm Hill and Knowlton to advance its public relations and media strategy and to emphasize hotel activity and tourism in the City. • Souvenir Shop: Souvenir products will be monitored for quality merchandise and demand and staff will continue efforts to establish and provide online promotion of the items in our Souvenir Shop. • Business Outreach and Hospitality: The Agency will continue to promote and provide local and prospective companies with the opportunity to attend Quakes baseball games as Agency guests. • Toll-Free Phone Line: The Agency will continue to offer its toll free phone line in an effort to make the Agency more accessible to its clients. P187 37 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Annua/Report2O10/11 C. Capitallmprovements The Agency will continue to implement capital physical and economic blighting conditions that private investment in the project area. Activities improvement projects to eliminate the have led to underutilization and lack of may include: Public Infrastructure and Flood Control Improvements Hellman Avenue Storm Drain (Lower Reach): Staff will continue to work on finalizing construction on Phase I of this project, which is expected to be complete during the third quarter of 2011. The design on Phase II of this project is complete, and construction will begin pending the outcome of the CRA vs. Matosantos lawsuit regarding AB 1X 26/27 and the future of Redevelopment Agency funding. • Foothill Boulevard Improvements: Staff will work to finalize Phase II of this project (Vineyard Ave. to bridge), which includes median improvements, street widening, sidewalk construction, landscaping, a pedestrian bridge, a street archway, and a Point of Interest Park to celebrate Historic Route 66. Staff will move forward with construction on Phase III of this project (bridge to Grove Ave.) pending the outcome of the CRA vs. Matosantos lawsuit regarding AB 1X 26/27 and the future of Redevelopment Agency funding. East Avenue Master Plan Storm Drain: Staff will proceed with construction on this project, which is expected to be complete during the fourth quarter of 2011. This project will provide much need flood control improvements to residents and businesses within the Project Area. • Upper Cucamonga Storm Drain and Hellman Ave. Widening Improvements: Staff will continue to evaluate potential funding sources for this project. When completed, this project will provide much needed flood protection for businesses and residences within the project area. I-15/Base Line Interchange: Staff will work to finalize the environmental report and design for this project by the first quarter of 2012. Staff will move forward with construction on this project pending the outcome of the CRA vs. Matosantos lawsuit regarding AB 1X 26/27 and the future of Redevelopment Agency funding. • Archibald Avenue Storm Drain & Street Improvements: Staff will continue to work on the design phase of this project, which includes the pavement rehabilitation and installation of a storm drain along Archibald Avenue, from Base Line Road south to Foothill Boulevard. The construction on this project will begin pending the outcome of the CRA vs. Matosantos lawsuit regarding AB 1X 26/27 and the future of Redevelopment Agency funding. • Etiwanda Avenue Grade Separation: Staff will continue to prepare for the design P188 38 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Annua/ Report 2010/11 and construction phases of this project, which are pending. the outcome of the CRA vs. Matosantos lawsuit regarding AB 1X 26/27 and the future of Redevelopment Agency funding. • Haven Avenue Median Island Retrofit: Staff will continue to prepare for construction on this project, which will begin pending the outcome of the CRA vs. Matosantos lawsuit regarding AB 1X 26/27 and the future of Redevelopment Agency funding. This project will provide retrofit improvements and the installation of low water landscaping to the median islands on Haven Avenue from 4th Street north to the 210 Freeway. Community & Cultural Facilities • Corporate Yard Expansion: Staff will continue to move forward with construction on this project, which includes necessary improvements to a crucial facility that provides valuable services that prevent blight within the project area. Construction on this project is expected to be complete during the second quarter of 2012. • Pacific Electric Trail: Staff will work to finalize construction on Phase IV of this project, which will connect the trail from Amethyst Ave. west to Grove Ave. This is the final phase of the project and is expected to be completed by the fourth quarter of 2011 with the completion of the new bridge over Foothill Blvd. • Neighborhood Park Cot 9th & Madrone: Agency staff will continue to work with the Community Services Department on the design phase of this project and will begin demolition of the existing site structures pending the outcome of the CRA vs. Matosantos lawsuit regarding AB 1X 26/27. The Agency will also explore future opportunities to acquire additional land to expand on the size of the park. When completed, the project will provide open recreational space for the residents of southwest Cucamonga. • Historic Preservation: Construction on the improvements to the Etiwanda Train Depot property, which include roof repair, lead paint and asbestos removal, and plumbing and electrical repairs, will begin pending the outcome of the CRA vs. Matsantos lawsuit regarding AB 1X 26/27. Once complete, this project will serve as a museum and trail head rest stop for the Pacific Electric Trail. The Agency will also evaluate opportunities to support additional Historic Preservation Programs during the 2011/12 fiscal year. Fire & Public Safety Facilities • Fire Station #177/Demens Basin Project: Staff will continue to support the Fire Protection District on the construction of this project, which is expected to be complete during the fourth quarter of 2011. P189 39 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Annua/Report 1010/11 • San Bernardino Rd. Fire Station #172 Relocation: Staff will continue to work with the Fire Protection District to relocate the San Bernardino Road Fire Station #172. Pre-construction activities will iinclude the demolition of the existing structures and grading of the property. D. Workforce Housing The Agency will continue to seek opportunities to expand and maintain the City's supply of affordable housing through the leveraging of opportunities with local non-profits and through county, state and federal programs. The Agency will continue to explore opportunities for development of land-banked parcels. First-Time Homebuyers Program: Staff will continue to contract with Neighborhood Housing Services (NHS) to help administer the First Time Homebuyer program and will conduct annual verification of the participants to ensure compliance with the program's rules and regulations. Staff will begin accepting new applicants for the program pending the outcome of the CRA vs. Matosantos lawsuit and the future of Redevelopment Agency funding. Multi-Family Housing Site Visitation Program: The Agency will continue with the annual site visiatation program to assist in physically monitoring its multi-family housing investments. ' Mobile Home Rental Assistance Program: Staff will continue its implementation of the Mobile Home Rental Assistance Program, and will work to promote the program and identify mobile home residents that are eligible for assistance under the programs guidelines. Mobile Home Accord: The Mobile Home Accord acts as a rent stabilization agreement between the City and the mobile home park owners by limiting how much the park owners can raise space rents based on the Consumer Price Index (CPI). Agency staff will continue to serve as a liaison between the mobile home park owners and the park residents throughout the remaining term of the Accord, which is set to expire in 2015. • Foreclosure Prevention Assistance Workshops: Staff will continue to evaluate opportunities for hosting additional Foreclosure Prevention Assistance Workshops during the 2011/12 fiscal year. San Bernardino County Homeless Partnership: Staff will continue its partnership with the County of San Bernardino and other cities and implement the 10-year strategic plan to end homelessness in San Bernardino County and provide services and resources to the County's homeless population. • Neighborhood Stabilization Program (NSPI: The Agency will continue working P190 40 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Annua/Report 2010/11 with the Planning Department to rehabilitate the .three homes that were purchased with NSP funds. Once the improvements are complete, these three homes will be sold to low and moderate income families participating in the First- Time Homebuyer Program. Staff will also continue to evaluate additional opportunities to assist local nonprofit agencies that provide safe and affordable housing with the remainder of the City's NSP funds. • Crime Free Multi-Family Housing Program: The Agency will continue to facilitate the participation of its housing partners in the City's Crime Free Multi-Family Housing Program, which provides property managers and owners with instruction on how to administer the eviction process, establish fair tenant screening, provide a safe- living environment for all tenants, and improve working relationships with law enforcement. VI. Audit for Fiscal Year 2010/11 In accordance with California Health and Safety Code, Section 33080.1(a), the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency contracted with the firm of Lance, Soll, & Lunghard, Certified Public Accountants, to complete an examination of the financial records and transactions of the Agency for the year ending June 30, 2011. This financial audit, as prepared by the auditor and submitted to the Redevelopment Agency, and is included as a part of this report. VII. Statement of Indebtedness Fiscal Year 2011/12 P191 41 ~' V~ ~' ~~ " ~ ,~ ~~ 1 ~ i ~_ ~~ O ~~ ~~ ,~ , ~- 4~~ ~~ ,},, i O ~. ~~ ~' ,,~ -, 3~ ~~ ~, ~~ O N~ 0 ~~ O~ N~ a~~ ~, a~ ~, ,,U O rrO` l_11V Vl ~~ ~, a ~~ V ~~:+~ ~, \~Iii/1 • ~_ ~' ~~ _O V1 ~~ O (/~ L Q L L V V ~A Q a--+ Q 0 V .~ O O U W 0 V Q .~ m • 0 ~ Q O Q. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ DC ~ ~ -- ~ ~ ~ c~ aD • V .> cn c~ ~ ~ . ~ o 0 ~ ~ ~ o ~ a~ V O O aA .~ c~ • • N 4A .~ O L L7 • ~ . - .~ L V ~ I N_ . ~ `n O O ~ v +, O O ~ O ~ ~ o ~ ~ • (n ~ V ~' ~ N ~ O O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ O ~ p ~ O ~ ~ ~ a--~ ~ a_+ fQ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ f~ f~ Cp Q ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Q Q Q ~ ~ m _ ~ m . 0 Q U L a-+ fa 0 C/') CAA .~ O m t1A .~ O C~ a~ .~ Z ~' `. J~1 ~ ~ L ~- '~ ~ ~ l --~ t ,`~ r ~ ~ Y ~~ ~ ~+ N O O N cn a~ .? a a b~iA Q • .o N 0 0 0 • 0 .~ o°o O J 0 • • O r-1 c~ a~ V V to • 0 .~ .~, V O 0 J • a--+ Q U L 0 L >O a--+ Q 0 U .~ O O U W 0 ~_ X O Q a--+ a--+ N C~ U ~--~ ~` Q~ N ~1--~ L. •- ~ Q~ Q ~ ~ ~ ~ ._ ~ o ~ a~ ~ ~ ._ ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ *~ v ~ •- O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ ~ ~ y- v cv O V ~ ~ ~ O .- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ W (~ • • • cJ'f a--+ L Q E a--~ V a--~ ~~ V / ' ~ 1 ~~ O V ~ ~ ~ a V .~ c~ c n ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N Q U a--+ ~ ~ aA v ~ ._ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ o .~ Q Q ~ O ._ ~ ~; ~ U ~ U a--+ ~ ~ u'~ +-+ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~_ p cn - ~ z v, w ~ ~ _ • • .~ V C~ LL V N N a--+ U .~ O L U aA Q t"~ e-~ ~ 0 ~ r-1 ~- N ~ O - ~ O ~ ~ ~ . o c~ o 00 ~ ~ 1.A ~ N N ~V ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ • ~ a--+ ~ , ~ V im , ~ ~' . .. . ~ ~ U ~ ~ ~ ~ o w • hA O 2 U i O L O a~ ~ ~, ~ ~ o ~ a~ •- o ~ ~ ~ a~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ °' ~ a~ . ~ ~ L ~ ~ U V ~ ~ ~ ~ .~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N Q ~ ~ ~ a--+ V ~ ~ ~ N ~ a~ o '~ ~ z ~ ~ ~ ~ a--+ Q a--+ U N .~ O L a 3 v z .~ ca N ~ M ~ N ~N N ~ O •~ _~~._ ~ cn ~~~ ~ •- ~ O ~ ~ ~ ~. ('~ i 4~ ~ O_ ~ ~ ~ Z O ~' • ~~ L Ca ~ ~ ~ - CAA ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ '~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~ N ~ .- .v N ,0 p ~- ~ ~ ~ U ~ ~~~ • - L. ~ ~ ~ ~ w U ~~ • • .o .- _. N O ~ O i/~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~ 4J ~ C~ cn • f0 L L 0 •~ ~~ L .~ .j 0 Q _O 0 Q V 4~ 4A Q • V ca N .~ ~--~ Q i ~/'~ ~ O O V C6 • fa V O ~--i .~ O U .~ ~/'~ .~ 410 ._ .~ V U L .~ -i-~ ~~-+ ~--+ • L 4- 0 ~--r U l~ O N I 0 O N ._ L 0 V C~ a--~ cn a C~ a--~ 4~ a, 0 z •~ 0 a~ ~ ~ o , ~, i~ Q ~ 00 ~ ~--' ~ ~ ~ O V ~ rl O N • > ~ ~ .~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ ._ ~ ~ .~ ~ •- ~ Q L ~ ~ ~ V) +~ ~ Q~ • (~ ~ ~ O ~ ~ ~ v ~, ~ ~ ~ O ~ , cf1 i '~ ~, CAA Q ~ ~, ~ o ~ Q • • • .~ ._ 4 t t C c L s s r 0 ._ •- O v .~ ~ O ~ O ~ O •- _ ~ V CO V1 ~ ~ ~ a O _ c n '- ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ V ~ ~ O ~ M ~ z N o 1 ~ ` ~..L L O ' ~ ~ O ~ ~--~ V) O L ~ ~ O O ~ 4- ~ '` > ~ •- ~ 4~ L ~ +~' ~ ~ - ~ ~ ~. •_ ~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ U ~ 4A ~ ~ ~ .~ ~ _ ~ ~ t~ N ~ ~ •- ~ V ~ O ~ O ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ L a--+ c/'f [a D U .~ O O V W l0 N r-I m Q ~_ ~ V ~ ~ ~ f~ ~ o ~ 0 ~ ~ •- a~ ~ ,o ~ ~ ~ v - O O ~ O v = U O - ~ ~ N ~ ~ O ~ ~ ~ ~' ~ `~ ~ crf ~ ca ~ ~ t/1 ~ ~--+ ~ ~ > t!7 N Q N O '~ c~ c~ U .- ~ . ~ O •- ~ ~ ~ O ~ O ~ w ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ V ~ L a--+ U .~ O ~ V ^~~ U o 0 0 0 0 0- . o 0 0 0 0 0- 0 0 0 0 0 0- ' 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0- cr ~o ~o ~ o0 00 .• m ~ I~ d ~ m - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ tn. ~ n `fi rn rn ~ n o o o o .. ~ ~ > ~, UJ N ~ ~ ~ n Q ~ • O c ~ ~ fC ~ ~ ~N ~ ~ ~ 4. .... C Q ~ ~ ~ ~„~ N ~ ~ ~fII ~ Q .~ a.. (/~ ~ ' ~ ~ O LJJ ~ ~ ~ +' ~ ~ ~ ~ U rl ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ O m v +, ~ ~ O a--+ N i ~_ U N N U i • ~ 2 w a ii L f~ _"~ N U .~ O W ~~ ~..L ' ' °o 0 0 0 ~ ~ °o 0 0 0 ri ~ °o 0 0 00 oo ~ ~ °o 0 0 ~ m ~ °o 0 0 o ~ ~ °o 0 0 0 u~i m ~ ~ rn ~ • ~ ~ ~ • ~ ~t ~ N a--+ a--+ - '~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ • ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~i O ~ L fB ~ Q ~ ~ C ~ _ ~ ~ ~ ~ C C ~ i ~ ~ f0 fa ~ O Q ~ U ~ ~ • m N U ~ ~ • ~ ~ ~ ~ L ~ ~ C 0 ~ ~ •(~ O N rl Q L fa ~, LL = ~ ~ 0 = W O v ^~ n ^~ W V .~ O W J- l ~i • o °o °o l0 n~ 0 °o °o N rn 0 °o .. °o M . ~ 0 °o °o m .may, 0- oNO •• m - N ~ ~ m o ~n .. o N ~ l~ Ol • • r-I 1.f1 N 4A Y ~ ~ ~ C . ~ a N U ~ ~ • L 0 ~ ~ ~ Q O ~ ~ L v ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 •~ ~` > O ~ ~~ ~ ~ Q Q ~ z • ~ ~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ J Q ~, `~ 3 ~ ' ~ Q ~ ~ ~ W m O ca tv0 .~ m a~ 0 a~ a~ a~ oc