HomeMy WebLinkAbout1994/04/06 - Agenda Packet CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
REGULAR MEETINGS
1st and 3rd Wednesdays - 7:00 p.m.
April 6, 1994
Civic Center
Council Chambers
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucnmonga, California 91730
***
City Councilmembers
Dennis L. Stout, Mayor
Charles J. Buquet, Mayor Pro Tern
William J. Alexander, Councilmember
Rex Gutierrez, Councilmember
Diane Williams, Councilmember
Jack Lain, City Manager
James L. Markman, City Attorney
Debra J. Ad3ms, City Clerk
City Office: 989-1851
PAGE
City Council Agenda
April 6, 1994 1
All items submitted for the City Council Agende must be in
writing. The deadline for submitting these items Is 6:00
p.m. on the Tuesday prior to the meeting. The City Clerk's
Office receives all such items.
1. Roll Call: Bucluet , Alexander~,Stout
W'dllarns , an~ Gutierrez
B. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS;
1. Presentorion of Proclomotion recognizing Apdl 18 - 23, 1~94 as
NQtionol Volunteer Week.
2. Presentatlan of Proclamation recognizing Apdl 11 - 17. 1994 as
Architedure Week in Rancho Cucomonga.
3. Presentation of a Proclamation to Buster Rlpi in celebration of 89
years of life and community senAce.
4. Presentation of a Proclamation recognizing Apdl as Earthquake
Preparedness Month.
C. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC
This Is the time and place for the general public to address
the City Council. State law prohibits the City Council from
addressing any issue not previously included on the Agerids.
The City Council may receive testimony and set lhe matter
for · subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five
minutes per individual.
D. CONSENT CALENDAR
The following Consent Calendar Items are expected to be
routine and non-controversial. They will be acted upon by
the Council at one time without discussion. Any Item may be
removed by a Councilmember or member of the audience for
discussion.
1. Approval of MInutes: March 2. 1994
March 16, 1994
PAGE
I City Council Agenda
April 6, 1994 2
2. Approval of Warrants, Register Nos. 3/9/94, 3/16/94 and 3/23/94 ].
and Payroll ending 3/10/94 for the total amount of S7,569,960.96.
3. Alcoholic Beverage Application for On Sale Beer &Wine Eating 15
Place for Chuck's DIner, Charles Waidon Lane, 8890 8th Street.
4. Approval to appropridte S163,210.00 from Fund 10(Propositio~ 111) 17
"Rochester Avenue/Rancho Cucamonga High School Mitigation
Program" to pay construction costs pertaining to the Rochester
Avenue Landscape Improvements along the east side parkway.
5. Approval to authorize the advertising of the 'Notice Inviting Bids" 18
for the Rochester Avenue-Rancho Cucarnonga High School
Mitigation PrOgram" for the landscaping of Rochester Avenue
east side parkway, from Victoria Park Lane to Highland Avenue, to
pefundedfromRDAAccountNo. 11-510[]0 ($60J:]l:10.0[]) and Fund 10
Account No. 10-4637-9319 ($1 63.__r['0~.[]0).
RESOLUTION NO. 944356 20
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CAUFORNIA, APPROVING
PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE 'ROCHESTER
AVENUE-RANCHO CUCAMONGA HIGH SCHOOL
MITIGATION PROGRAM, FOR THE LANDSCAPfNG OF
ROCHESTER AVENUE EAST SIDE PARKSNAY, FROM
VICTORIA PARK LANE TO HIGHLAND AVENUE" IN
SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZJNG AND DIRECTING THE
CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS
6. Approval of a Resolution to Modify a Condition of Approval for 24
Tentative ParCel Map 12877 - Golden: A resolution confirming a
City Council decision macle on March 16, 1994, fo~ an appeal of a
Planning Commis~lan decision to deny a modification to a
condition of approval to underground the existing overhead
utilities beyond the limits Of the project site for a subdivision of 3.28
acres of land Into 2 parcels in the Very Low Residential District (less
than 2 dwelling units per acre), located on the north side of Hillside
Road east Of Moonstone Avenue - Alan 1061-251-24.
PAGE
City Council Agenda
April 6, 1994 3
F,~SOLUT1ON NO. 94-057 25
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
i~,NCHO CUCAMONGA. CAUFORNIA. A~VING
A REQJEST TO MODIFY A CONDITION OF APR"<OVAL
FOR TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 12877. TO
UNDERGROUND THE EXIST1NG OVERHEAD UTILITIES
ONLY WITHIN THE LIMITS OF THE PROJECT SITE.
LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF HILLSIDE F,',',',~AD,
EAST OF MOONSTONE AVENUE WITHIN THE VERY
LOW (LESS THAN 2 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE)
RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT AND MAKING FINDINGS IN
SUPPORT THEREOF - APN 1G51-251-24
7. Approval of Resolutions authortTJng Issuance of Bonds, approving 27
Form of Bond Indenture, Bond Purchase Agreement and
Preliminary Official Statement and specifying conditions for the
prepayment of special taxes for Community Facilities District 88-2.
F~SOLU~ON NO. 94-058 28
A RESOLUTION OF THE CrTY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING
ISSUANCE OF BONDS, APPROVING FORM OF BOND
INDENTURE, BOND PURCHASE AGREEMENT AND
PRELIMINARY OFFICIAL STATEMENT FOR
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 88-2
8. Approval to purchase telephone/voice mall system for City Yard 30
not to excccd S20~00 through transfer from (01-4647-3900) to S01-
4647-7044).
9. Approval to enter into and Execute an Agreement with Charles 32
Bradford Downey for a Construction, Grading, Storm Drain and
Street Dedication Easement for the Sports Complex Expanded
Paddng Lot Project - Staff Is asking for approval of this agreement
so that the soutllem haft of ROChester Avenue can be widened to
its ultimate wk:llh, plus add storm drain and bus bay.
10. . Approval to execute a Profe~onal Services Agreement (CO 94- 33
021) with Norfis-Repke, Incoq3orated, for the design, sbeci~catians
and cost estimate for the improvements of Camelian Street from
San Bemardino Road to Base Une Road. The cost of the Service is
S88~00.00 (S80~00.00 plus 10% contingency) and will be funded
from Fund 32 - Measure I, Account No. 32-4637-9314.
PAGE
~)"~ City Council Agenda
April 6, 1994 4
11. Approval to execute on Amended Ubrary SenAce Enhancement 35
Contract (CO 92-016) with San Bernardino County Ubrary for Fiscal
Year 1993/1994 in the amount of S25J:]00.00 from Account Number
01-~L532-6028-4200.
12. Approval to execute Contract Change Order No. 1 for the 38
Professional Services Agreement with LD. King, Incorporated, CO
934360, Rancho Cucamonga Metrolink Station at Milliken Avenue
and the Metrolink Railway, Account Numbers 36-4637-9326 and 37-
4637-9326 for $57,577.00 ($28,788.50 from each account).
13. Approval to execute Contract Change Order No. 1 for the 39
Professional Services Agreement with RJM Design Group,
Incorporated, CO 93-061, Rancho Cucamonga Metrolink Station at
Milliken Avenue and the Metrolink Railway, Account Numbers 36-
4637-9326 and 37-4637-9326 for $28,473.00 (S14,236.50 from each
account).
14. Approval to execute Contract Change Order NO. 1 for the 40
Professional Services Agreement with Williamson & Schmid, CO
94-004, Arrow Route Storm Drain portion of the Milliken Avenue
Extension from Arrow Route to Foothill Boulevard Project, Account
Number 32-4637-9328 for
15. Approval to file a Notice of Completion and partial release of 41
retention for the Sports Complex Construction Project.
r~SOLU11ON NO. 94,059 42
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CAUFORNIA, AUTHORIZING
THE FLUNG OF A NOllCE OF COMPLETION, RELEASE
OF APPUCABLE BONDS AND PARTIAL RELEASE OF
RETENTION FOR THE SPORTS COMPLEX
CONS~T~ICTION PROJECT
16. ApprOval tO release Maintenance Guarantee Bond for Tract 14192- 43
1 Landsoape and Storm Drain, located on the east side of
Hellman Avenue south of 19th Street.
Release Malnt~nanc~ Guarantee Bond
Landscape S 42,7G[}.[]0
Storm Drain 6,~0.00
PAGE
~ City Council Agends
April 6, 1994 5
E. CONSENT ORDINANCES
The following Ordinances have had public hearings at the time
of first reading. Second readings are expected to be routine
and non-controversial, They will be acted upon by the
Council at one tim without discussion. The City Clerk will
read the title. Any item can be removed for discussion.
No items Submitted.
F. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS
The following items have been advertised and/or posted as
public hearings as required by law. The Chair will open the
meeting to receive public testimony.
1. CONSIDERATION OF ENVIP4DNMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL 44
PtAN AMENDMENT 93-[]2B - MASI PARTNEF~S - A request to add
Recreational Commercial as a land use designation in the
General Plan and to amend the land use designation from
Industrial Park to Recreational Commercial for 27 acres of land
located at the southwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and
Rochester Avenue - APN: 229-011-10. 19, 21, and 26 through 28.
Planning Commission recommends issuance of a Negative
Declaration. Related File: Conditional User Permit 91-24.
(Continued fron~ March 16, 19~4)
r~SOLU11ON NO. 94-052 104
A RESOLUTION OF THE CI~' COUNCIL OF THE CiTY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CAUFORNIA, APPROVING
GENERAL R.AN AMENDMENT 93-02B, PART A,
AMENDING THE GENERAL PLAN TO ADD A NEW
LAND USE CATEGORY OF 'RECREATIONAL
COMMERCIAL', AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT
THEREOF
PAGE
i i '~' City Council Agenda
April 6, 1994 6
RESOLUTION NO. 94-053 107
A RESOLURON OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CiTY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGAo CAUFORNIA, APPF~:)V~NG
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 93-02B, PART B,
AMENDING THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP
FROM INDUSTRIAL PARK TO RECREATIONAL
COMMERCIAL FOR 27 ACRES OF LAND, LOCATED AT
THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD
AND F, NDCHESTER AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN
SUPPORTTHEREOF-APN: 220-011-10, 19,20,21.AND
26 THRC)ir,~H 28
CONSIDERATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND 44
INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 94-02 - MASI
PARTNERS - A recluest to modify Subarea 7 to allow limited
Commercial on 27 acres of land located at the southwest comer
of Foothill Boulevard and Rochester Avenue, APN: 229011-10, 19,
21, and 26 through 28; and modify the definition of Automotive
Service Courts. Ranning Commaion recommends issuance at a
Negative Declaration.
~ C)~DtNANCE hK). 521 (~t reading) 111
AN ~NANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CIIY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CAUFORNIA. APPROVING
INDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 94-02.
AMENDING SUBAREA 7 TO ALLOW LIMITED
COMMERCIAL AND TO MODIFY THE DEFINITION OF
'AUTOMOTIVE SERVICE COURT', AND MAKING
RNDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF
2. COhISIDERAllON OF DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT 94-01 - City 115
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - Consideration of an Ordinance
amending the Development Code to implement transportation
control measure mandated by State and Federal Air Quality
Reguiatlor~. This action Is Categorically ExemDt from
environmental review per Section 15308 of the CEQA Guidelines.
OI~I~NANCE NO. 522 (fht reoding) 127
AN ~ OF THE C~Y COUNCIL OF THE C'IP,' OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CAUFORNIA, APPI~VING
DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT 94-0], CHAM/I:RS
]7.08. ]7.]0AND ]7.]2 OFTHE RANCHO~
MUNICIPAL CODE, REGARDING TRIP REDUCllON
FaSQUIREMENTS. AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT
~ THEREOF
PAGE
I i~ City Council Agenda
April 6, 1994 7
CONSIDEI~ATIC)N OF INDUS'TT~IAL Ar'~ja, SPECIFIC R_AN AMENDMENT 115
94-01 - CiTY OF I~ANCHO CUCAMONGA - Consideredion of an
Ordinance amending the Industrial Area Specific Plan to
implement transportorion control measures mandated by State
and Federal Air Quality Regulations. This oction is Categorically
Exempt fTOm environmental review per Section 15308 of the CEOA
Guidelines.
OrdNANCE NO. 523dht reading) 132
AN OK~NANCE OF 11-tE CrrY COUNCIL OF 11-1E CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CAUFORNIA, ~VING
INDUSTI~AL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 94-01,
AMENDING PART III, REGARDING TRIP REDUCTION
REQUIREMENTS AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT
THEREOF
G. PUBLIC HEARING~
The following items have no legal publication or posting
;."' c..,, .,,, op.. ,.. m..,,.g ,o ,.c.,v.
on
No Items Submitted. :
H, CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPOR'r~
The following items do not legally require any public
testimony, although the Chair may open the meeting for
public Input.
No Items Submitted.
I, COUNCIL BUSINESR
The following Item have ben requested by the CIty Council
for discussion. They are not pubtic hearing items, although
the Chair may open the meeting for public input.
1, ~ 135
2. UPDATE BY COUNCILMEMBI:I~ BUQUET ON SCAG'S I~EGION.,~[ 136
PAGE
City Council Agenda
April 6, 1994 8
J. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING
This is the time for City Council to identify the items they
wish to discuss at the next meeting. These items will not be
discussed at this meeting, only identified for the next
meeting.
K. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC
This is the time and place for the general public to address
the CIty Council. Stale law prohibits the City Council from
addressing any issue not previously included on the Agerids.
The City Council may receive testimony and set the matter
for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five
minutes per individual.
MEETING TO ADJOURN TO EXECUTIVE SESSION TO DISCUSS
LABOR NEGOTIATIONS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION
54957.6 TO GIVE ROBERT DOMINGUEZ, ADMINISTRATIVE
SERVICES DIRECTOR, DIRECTION IN REGARDS TO THE MEET
AND CONFER PROCESS WITH ALL CITY EMPLOYEE GROUPS.
l, Debra J. Adams, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, hereby
certify that a true, curate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on
March 31, 1994, seventy-two (72) hours prior to the meeting per
Government Code 54953 at 10500 Civic Center Drive.
March 2, 1994
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
CITY COUNCIL IVHNUTES
A regular meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga City Council was held on Wednesday, March 2, 1994, in the Council
Chambers of the Civic Center, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Runcho Cucamonga, California. The meeting
was called to order at 7:08 p.m. by Mayor Pro Tern Charles J. Buquel H.
Present were Councilmembers: William J. Alexander, Rex Gu~errez, Diane Willinms, Mayor Pro Tem Charles J.
Buquet H, and Mayor Dennis L. Stout (arrived at 8:06 p.m.)
Also present were: Jack Lain, City Manager, Ralph Hanson, Deputy City Attorney; Jerry B. Fulwood, Deputy City
Manager, Linda D. Daniels, RDA Manager, Rick Gomez, Community Development Director, Shintu Bose, Deputy
City Engineer, Dave Blevins, Public Works Maintenance Manager, Bill Makshanoff, Building Official; Jim Martin,
Plan Check Coordinator, Suzanne Ota, Community Services Manager, Bob Deminguez, Administrative Services
Director, Susan Stark, Finance Officer,, Jim Frost, City Treasurer, Bob Trammell, Dam Processing Manager, Vasile
Giulea, Data Base Management Analyst; Anna Coleman, Programmer Analyst; Lorraine Phong, Programmer
Analyst; Ing~d Blair, GIS Supervisor; Sandy Ramirez, Resource Services Supervisor; loan Kruse, Purchasing
Agent; Diane O'Neal, Management Analyst II; Susan Mickey, Management Analyst I; Chief Dennis Michael,
Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District; Capt. Bruce Zeiner, Rancho Cucamonga Police Department; and Jan
Sutton, Deputy City Clerk.
B. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS
B 1. Presentation of Proclamation declaring March as American Red Cross Month.
Mayor Pro Tern Buquet presented the proclamation to Rose Cotms of the American Red Cross.
C. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIc
C 1. Jacqueline Bolda, ML Gunnison Court, thanked the Fire Department for their attention and assistance during
a recent tour of the Banyan Fire Station by the kindergarten classes from Caryn Elementary school. She
stated she also appreciated the response from the Puliee and Fire Depafiraents to pafiicipate in the Family
Fun Day being organized by the parents at Caryn Elementary.
C2. Sara Glenny, 6580 Etiwanda Avenue, asked the Council to support the D.A.R.E. program at their school
because it was important to all the kids and would help them prepare for their years in middle and high
school.
City Council Minutes
March 2, 1994
Page 2
C3. Amanda Michael, 12774 Coriander and a 4th grader at Windrows Elementary, also asked the Council to
support the D.A.R.E. program and because it was very important to all the students to be educated to the
dangers of chug use.
C4. Dan Glass, 12840 Coriander, asked the Council to look into funding the D.A.R.E. program on a yearly
basis and not let it continue as a bi-yearly program because there were too many kids who were missing out
on this important program. He stated the parents were concerned about this, and if funds were not available
through the City, possibly other avenues could be explored.
D. CONSENT CALENDAR
DI. Approval of Minutes: February 16, 1994
D2. Approval of Warrants, Register Nos. 2/9/94 and 2/16/94; and PayroB ending 2/6/94 for the total mount of
$1,526,136.02.
D3. Approval to authorize the advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bids" for the Rancho Cucamonga Metrolink
Station Phase I, Milliken Avenue and Metxolink Railway, to be funded from San Bemardino County Measure
I/Commuter Rail, Account No. 37-4637-9326, and State Proposition 108 Passenger Rail Bond Act, Account No. 36-
4637-9326.
RESOLUTION NO. 94-036
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR
THE "RANCHO CUCAMONGA METROLINK STATION PHASE I, MILLIKEN
AVENUE AND METROLINK RAILWAY," IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING
AND DIREC'I'ING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS
D4. Approval to expend Asset Seizure Funds for law enforcement equipment, in the amount of $82,000.00.
D5. Approval to expend Asset Seizure Funds for Bicycle Enforcement Team Equipment in the amount of
$26,000.00
D6. Approval to execute a Subordination Agreement form Charles S. and Theresa L. Hewitt for their property
located at 9623 Almond Street (APN: 1061-521-20).
RESOLUTION NO. 94-037
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A SUBORDINATION AGREEMENT
FROM CHARLES S. AND THERESA L. HEW [I'I' AND AUTHORIZING THE
MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN SAME (APN 1061-521-20)
D7. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement. Improvement Securities and Ordering the Annexation to
Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance Dislxict Nos. 1 and 2 for DR 92-11, located
at 9400 Almond Street, submitted by Randolph S. Davis and Sandra P. Davis.
City Council Minutes
March 2, 1994
Page 3
RESOLUTION NO. 94-038
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND
IMPROVEMENT SECURfI1ES FOR DR 92-11
RESOLUTION NO. 94-039
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN
TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 AND STREET
LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2 FOR DR 92-11
D8. Appr~valto~e~euseMaintenanceGuarante~B~ndforTra~t~3898~cated~nthenorthwest~mer~f~
Avenue and Lonck~n Sm~e~
Release: Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Stzeet) $18,900.00
D9. Approval to accept Improvements, Release of Bonds, and Notice of Completion for the Lions Park
Community Center Roofing Project, CO 93-084.
Release: Faithful Performance Bond $ 58,155.00
RESOLUTION NO. 94-040
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR
THE LIONS PARK COMMUNITY CENTER ROOFING PROJECT AND
AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK
10. Approval to Release Maintenance Guarante~ Bonds for th~ following Improvement Projects: 1 ) Archibald
Avenue Entxy Monuments Proj~t (CO 88-056); 2) Slurry Seal Program, Phase I, 1987-1988 (CO 88-
069); 3) Archibald Avenue Sidewalks, Phas~ II (CO 88-090); 4) Slurry Seal Program, Phase II, 1987-
1988 (CO 88-091); and 5) Lion Street Improvement Project, south of Ninth Siteel (CO 88-093).
Release: Maintenance Gmuan~e Bonds
Conlract88.056 $ 129,249.00
Contra,'t 88-069 8,578.00
Coou'act 88-090 3,977.89
Cootract 88-091 98,932.92
Contract 88-093 5,582.72
MOTION: Moved by Al~xanck~, seconded by Gufierrez to approve the staff recommendations contained in the staff
reports of the Consent Calendar. Motion carried unanimously, 4-0-1 (Stout absent).
City Council Minutes
March 2, 1994
Page 4
E. CONSENT ORDINANCES
El. CONSIDERATION OF AN ORDINANCE TO ESTABLISH A PUBLIC MUNICIPAL LIBRARY IN
AND FOR THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Jan Sutton, Deputy City Clerk, read the title of Ordinance No. 520.
ORDINANCE NO. 520 (second reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTARLISHING A PUBLIC MUNICIPAL LIBRARY
IN AND FOR THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by Gutietrez to waive full reading and adopt Ordinance No. 520. Motion
canied unanimously, 4-0-1 (Stout absen0.
F. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS
No items were submitted.
G. PUBLIC HEARINGS
GI. CONSIDERATION OF A REOUEST BY PROPERTY OWNERS TO FORM AN ASSESSMENT
DISTRICT TO FUND CERTAIN DRAINAGE FACB.ITIES IN SOUTH ETIWANDA (Continued from
December 1, 1993) Staff report presented by Jer~ B. Fulwood, Deputy City Manager.
Councilmember Gutierrez asked what was happening now with rig property owners.
JetTy FulwOOd, Deputy City Manager, stated staff is meeting with representatives from the proposed District and are
U,/ing to ~nalize a survey to the property owners to determine the level of interest in forming this DislxicL He
stated enough time has passed that some people have changed their minds on this. He stated they were also looking
into other options if financing was not available for this Dis~cL He stated once they have the results of the survey,
they will present it to the Subcommittee to review before bringing it back befcee the Council.
MOTION: Moved by Williarn8, seconded by Alexander to continue this item to the April 6, 1994 meeting. Motion
carried unanimously, 4-0- I (Stout absent).
H. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS
H1. CONSIDERATION TO APPROVE USAGE OF EPICENTER FOR D.A.R.E. FUNDRAISER Staff
report presented by Jerry B. Fulwood, Deputy City Manager, who introduced Mr. Sal Briguglio from the Rancho
Cucamonga Rotary Club.
City Council Minutes
March 2, 1994
Page 5
Sal Briguglio, 863 Antler Peak and representing the Rancho Cucamonga Rotary Club, stated that when it
was discovered the D.A.R.E. program was not available at every school, every year because of lack of
available funds, the Rotary Club felt they should become involved in some way so that the program could
be enhanced to reach as many kids as they possibly can. He stated they are proposing a baseball clinic to be
held at the Epicenter on Sunday, May 1, 1994. They will be receiving assistance from the Caiifomia
Angels, the 1994 Quakes team, and the Rancho Cucamonga Police DeparunenL The Rotary club will
organize the event and be responsible for the well-being of the children in attendance. He stated that all the
funds raised from this event will be donated to the D.A.RJL program. He refened to the flyer in the agenda
package for further details.
Councilmember Gutiorrez asked how they came to pick that date.
Sal Briguglio, Rotary, stated they had to coordinate a date where the stadium was available, and they could
get someone from the Angels as a sponsor. He stated they also want to get as many children as they could
to participate, and since the Little League season has already started they did not want to conflict with their
games on Salmdays.
Councilmember Alexander whai would be the cost for dtis.
Sul Briguglio, Rotary, stawxl the Ro~y Club was going to absorb the cost of pulling the evenL He slaled
it would cost each panicipani $28.00, and out of lhat $4.50 would go towards a Quaices shin for each
person. He stated they would have al~,updae medical and instance release forms signed prior to lhe sign-
up.
Councilmember Alexander asked if they had any ennlingency plans in case they had more children sign-up lhan they
had spaces available.
Sal Brignglio, Rotary, staled they have space available for 300 children, but if they have a large number of
requesls in excess of 300, they would be look inio getling anthorizalion to ulilize the softball fields oulside
of th~ stadium.
Councilmember Gulierrez hoped that in tlg futur~ they would be able to hold this on a different day of th~ week so
that there would not be a conflict with chulch activities.
Sai Brignglio, Rotmy, stated they got a late start on planning this event for this year, but since they hoped
to make this an annual event, they should be abl6 to work around that ~ of conflict in the future.
Councilmember Gutierr~z thanked th~ Retary Club for sponsoring this program, and felt it was a perfect exampl~ of
the partnership they needed between the City and the private sector, and felt this would be a great help in allowing
the City to expand the D.A.R.E. program.
Councihnumber Willianl$ also thankPA them for their efforts, and asked how security was going to be handled.
Sai Brignglio, Rotary, stated they would be working with the Sheriff's Reserves and the Bicycle Patrol as a
minimum, and were taking other precautions as well.
City Council Minutes
March 2, 1994
Page 6
Mayor Pro Tern Buquet inquired of staff if there would be a conflict with any softbaH leagues on that day in case
they nee~ed to as~ ~ extra fields.
S,,7~nne eta, Community Services Manager, stated she did not beheve there would be a conffict.
Lynn Adams, 11229 Reflection Drive, a._~ked if they had considered contingency plans for families with
multiple children, because the cost could really add up. She stated there would be people in the community
that would be willing to sponsor children ff they could not afford the cost.
Sul Brigugiio, Rotary, stated they had not addressed that issue as such because they had tried to keep the
price low enough for everyone to afford.
Mayor Pro Tern Buquet stated they might want to think about some type of scholarship program for families that
could not afford the cost for multiple children.
Councilmember Alexander stated they would have the full support of the Council for this, and that being able to
provide the D.A.R.E. program at every school every year was key, and it wonld be a savings in the long tenn.
MOTION: Moved by Gutiorrez, seconded by Willtams to approve the use of the EpiCenter for a D.A.R.E.
Fondmiser: Motion camed tmanimo~sly, 4-0-1 (Stout absenO.
I. COUNCIL BUSINESS
11. UPDATE ON RANCHO CUCAMONGA PUBLIC LIBRARY Staff re~ort presented by Linda D. Danlels,
RDA Manager.
ACTION: Report received and filed.
.I. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETlinG
I 1. Councilmember Willtams stated she would to se~ an item come before the Council on street vending, and
would work with staff on identifying a dale that would be presented.
I2. Mayor Pro Tern Buquet staled he would present an update report on SCAG's proposed Regional
Comprehensive Plan a~ the April 6, 1994 meeting.
K. COMIVIUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC
No commonications were made from the public.
City Council Minutes
March 2, 1994
Page 7
The City Council recessed at 7:45 p.m. until the conclusion of the Redevelopment Agency meeting. The City
Council reconvened at 9:08. p.m.
MOTION: Moved by Alexunder, seconded by Willjams to adjourn to Executive Session to discuss pending
litigation. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0. The meeting adjourned at 9:08 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Jan Sutton
Deputy City Clerk
Aplnuved:
March 16, 1994
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
A reguhff meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga City Council was held on Wednesday, March 16, 1994, in the Council
Chambers of the Civic Center, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. The meeting
was called to order at 7:09 p.m. by President Dennis L. Stout.
Present were Councilmembers: William J. Alexander, Charles J. Buquet H, Rex Gutierrez, Diane Willianls, and
President Dennis L. Stout.
Also present were: Jack Lain, City Manager, James Markman, City Attorney; Jerry B. Fulwood, Deputy City
Manager;, Linda D. Daniels, RDA Manager;, Rick Gomez, Community Development Director;, Brad Buller, City
Planner, Lany Henderson, Principal Planner, Cindy Non'is, Associate Planner, Joe O'Neil, City Engineer, Dan
James, Sr. Civil Engineer,, Bill Makshanoff, Building Official; Suzanne Ota, Community Services Manager; Bob
Dominguez, Administrative Services Director; Duane Baker, Assistant to the City Manager, Diane O'Neal,
Management Analyst H; Susan Mickey, Management Analyst I; Chief Dennis Michael, Rancho Cucamonga Fire
Protection District; Capt. Bruce Zeine~, Rancho Cucamonga Police Depatunent; and Debra J. Adams, City Clerk.
B. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS
B 1. Presentation of Proclamation to Cheryl Fish for her assistance to the Potice Department which aided in the
attest of four violent criminals.
Mayof Stout presented the proclamation to Cheryl Fish.
B2. Presentation of Proclamation to Byron Graham and Anthony Click for their assistance to a Deputy involved
in a physical altercation with a suspect.
Mayor Smut presented the proclamation to Byron Graham. Anthony Click was not presenL
B3. Presentation of Proclamation in recognition of Girl Scout Week in Rancho Cucamonga.
Mayor Stout presented the proclamation to Troop 1003.
City Council Minutes
March 16, 1994
Page 2
C. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC
C 1. Wendy Vailerie, 11116 Amarillo, Chairperson of ACTIVE, stated they have not had a response from the
Council on a previous request to get information on the proposed Route 30. She stated a meeting had been
scheduled for today, but that Councilmember Buquet cunceled it. She stated she did not agree with how
Councilmember Buquet was acting on this matter and why he was not responding to the concerns of the
residents.
Councilmember Alexander asked if an update could be given at the next meeting on this matter.
Councilmember Buquet stated this will occur and that it is the intention of the Subcommittee to do this.
Mayor Stout asked for an update to come back at the next m~g.
Councilmembr Buqnet stated that written information would also come back.
Mayor Stout stated when this comes back at the April 6 meeting that a suggested date be made when the community
roecling would take place.
C2. Frank Munos, 6621 Kern, stated he wanted to underline Ms. Vallette's comments. He hoped that
inf,~mation was not being kept from the public.
I}, CONSENT CALENDAR
Jack Lam, City Manager, stated that Item D14 needed to be pulled f~om the agend~
DI. Alpnova] of Warrants, Register Nos. 2/23/94 and 3/2/94; and Payroll ending 2/24/94 for the total amount
of $1,894,038.62.
D2. Aplnuval to receive and file current Inveslanent Schedule as of February 28, 1994.
D3. Alcoholic Beverage Application for On-Sale Beer & Wine Eating Place for Zacha~' s Ribs & Paste, Zane
M. Clevenger and Stephen K. Cross, 9759 Arrow Route, Suites A & B.
I)4. Alcoholic Beverage Application for Off Sale Beer & Wine for Travigne Italian Market H, Anthony N.
Pompohio, 10431 Lemon StyeeL Suite N.
D5. Approval to authorize the Advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bids" for the Etiwanda Community Trail
Drainage Imptovemems and Trail Modifications, the trail is located west of Etiwanda Avenue and south of Highland
Avenue, to be funded from Account No. 41-4130-9321. ITEM REMOVED FOR DISCUSSION BY
MAYOR STOUT.
RESOLUTION NO. 94-041
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCI-IO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR
THE "ETIWANDA COMMUNITY TRAIL DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS AND
TRAIL MODIFICATIONS" IN SAID CITY AND AU'I~ORIZING AND DIREt;I'ING
THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS
City Council Minutes
March 16, 1994
Page 3
D6. Approval to authorize the Advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bide" for the Milliken Park Parking Lot
Expansion and Park Modifications, location of Milliken Avenue, north of Foothill Boulevard, to be funded from
Account No. 43-4130-9323. ITEM REMOVED FOR DISCUSSION BY MAYOR STOUT.
RESOLUTION NO. 94-042
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR
THE "MILLIKEN PARK PARKING LOT EXPANSION AND PARK
MODIFICATION," IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE
CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS
D7. Approval of a request by the Rancho Cucamunga Chamber of Commerce to waive City fees in coojunction
with the Annual Business and Community Expo.
DS. Approval of request from Lions Club to utilize facsimile of Sports Stadium for use on Commemorative
Pin.
D9. Aptnuval of the Environmental Initial Study, Parts I and H, and Issuance of a Negative Declaration for the
Mewolink Station at Milliken Avenun and the Soothem California Regional Rail Authority Tracks; An Park, at the
same location; and the IMillilcen Avenue Extension from Foothill Boulevard to Arrow Route.
RESOLUTION NO. 94-043
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE ENVIRONMENTAL
ASSESSMENT INITIAL STUDY AND ISSUANCE OF A NEGATIVE
DECLARATION FOR THE METROLINK STATION AT bllI.I.IKEN AVENUE AND
THE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA REGIONAL RAIL AUTHORITY TRACKS; ART
PARK, AT THE SAME LOCATION; AND MILLIKEN AVENUE EXTENSION
PROM FOOTI-III .[. BOULEVARD TO ARROW ROLrFE
D10. Approval to execute a Lien Agreement as security for the completion of on-site grading activity for
Conditional Use Permit 90-37 (FooOfill Metplace), located on the south side of Foothill Boulevard between 1-15
and Etiwunda Avenue, submitted by Foothill Marketplace Partners.
RESOLUTION NO. 94-044
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING ALIEN AGREEMENT AS SECURITY
FOR COMPLETION OF ON-SITE GRADING ACTIVITY PROM FOOTHILL
MARKETPLACE PARTNERS AND AUTHORIZING MAYOR TO SIGN SAME
D 11. Approval to Release a Real P~tn~rty Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement and Acceptance of Cash
Deposit for Future Street Improvements for 9757 Liberty Street, located north of Lemon Avenue, east of Archibald
Avenue, submitted by College Escrow, Iueccln'atecL
City Council Minutes
Match 16, 1994
Page 4
RESOLUTION NO. 94-045
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RELEASING A REAL PROPERTY
IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT FROM 9757 LIBERTY
STREET
D12. Approval to Releas~ a Real Property Improvement Contnct and Lien Agrenment for 12982 Victoria
Avenue, located on the north side of Victoria Avenue, east of Etiwanda Avenue, submitted by Jeff Fort.
RESOLUTION NO. 94-046
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RELEASING A REAL PROPERTY
IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT FROM 12982 VICTORIA
AVENUE
D13. Am~ioval to execute a Professional Services Contract (CO 94-020) with Esgil Corporation of Sun Diego for
Building and Safety plan checking in an mount not to exceed $25,000.00, to be funded from Account No. 01-4373-
6028.
D14. .~.~-.-..I m ;.;;~.; LT.~-~zvz.T. zz~., P.z'.;~zz zf ~zr~z z.';_~ :Iz~zz zf Czm~.:z~zz fzr T~'j.:
REMOVED FROM AGENDA.
~ 7~.~'2
.: P..ESCLL.'TI. ON OF TIE CITY CCUI'.ICE. OF TIE CITY OF
D 15. A~,i-oval [~ ~ Im[xow~m~n[s, Release of Bonds and Notice of CompleAion for Tr'~t 13930, locamd on
Wilso~ Av~n~ a[ ~ A~n~.
Release Faithful Petfonnance Bond
Streets $ 297,000.00
Storm Drain 56,400.00
Utilities 190,000.00
City Council Minutes
March 16, 1994
Page 5
Acamt Maintenanco Gum'antee Bond
Streets $ 29,700.00
Storm Drain 56,400.00
Utilities 19,000.00
RESOLUTION NO. 94-048
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR
TRACT 13930 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION
FOR THE WORK
D 16. Approval to accept Improvements, Releaso of Bonds and Notice of Completion for DR 89-12, locateA on
Feron Boulevard east of Helms Avenue.
Release: Falthfal Performance Bond $ 29,300.00
RESOLUTION NO. 94-049
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR
DR 89-12 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION
FOR THE WORK
DI?. AFp~,~val to accept the Traffic Signs and Safety Lighting at MiHiken Avenue and Fairmont Way, Contract
No. CO 93-075, as Complete, Retain Bond and authorize the City Engineer to File a "Notic~ of Completion" and
approve the final contract amount of $79,135.00.
RESOLUTION NO. 94-050
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR
TRAI-'I,'iC SIGNALS AND SAFETY LIGHTING AT lVnI.I,IKEN AVENUE AND
FAIRMONT WAY, CONTRACT NO. CO 93-075, AND AUTHORE]NG THE FILING
OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK
D18. ' Approval to authorize the advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bids" for the iUilliken Avenue Extension,
between Arrow Route and Foothi Boalevard, including Arrow Route Storm Drain, to be funded from Measure I
(Arterial), Account No. 32-4637=9328.
RESOLUTION NO. 94-055
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, C.AI.TI:ORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR
THE "MIT.I.IICEN AVENUE EXTENSION, BETWEEN ARROW ROUTE AND
FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, INCLUDES ARROW ROUTE STORM DRAIN" IN SAID
CITY AND AUTHOI~rZtNG AND DIREUI'ING THE CITY CI.F. RK TO ADVERTISE
TO RECEIVE BIDS
City Council Minutes
March 16, 1994
Page 6
MOTION: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Alexander to avv, ove the staff recommendations in the sniff reports
contained in the Consent Calendar with the exception of Items DS, 136 and D14. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0.
DISCUSSION OF ITEM D$. Approval to authorize the Advertising of the "Notice Inviting
Bids" for the Etiwanda Community Trail Drainage Improvements and Trail Modifications, the
trail is located west of Etiwanda Avenue and south of Highland Avenue, to be funded from
Account No. 41-4130-9321.
Mayor Stout asked for further clarification on Item DS, with lee O'Neil, City Engineer, answering his questions.
RESOLUTION NO. 94-041
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR
THE "ETIWANDA COMMUNITY TRAIL DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS AND
TRAIL MODIYICATIONS' IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIREClING
THE CITY CI~RK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS
MOTION: Moved by Stout, seconded by Buquet to approve Resolution No. 94-041. Motion carried unanimously,
5-0.
DISCUSSION OF ITEM D6. Approval to authorize the Advertising of the "Notice Inviting
Bids" for the Milliken Park Parking Lot Expansion and Park Modifications, location ot
Milliken Avenue~ north of Foothill Boulevard, to be funded from Account No. 43-4130-9323.
Mayor Stout asked for further clarification on Item D6, with Ioe O'Neil, City Engineer, answering his questions.
RESOLUTION NO. 94-042
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR
THE "MILLIKEN PARK PARKING LOT EXPANSION AND PARK
MODIFICATION," IN SAID CITY AND' AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE
CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS
MOTION: Moved by Stout, seconded by Buquet to approve Resolution No. 94-042. Motion carried unanimously,
5-0.
E. CONSENT ORDINANCES
No items were submitted.
City Council Minutes
March 16, 1994
Page 7
ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS
F1. CONSIDERATION TO MODIFY A CONDITION OF APPROVAL FOR TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP
~ - Consideration of an appeal of the Planning Commission's decision to deny a modification to a
condition of approval to underground the existing overhead utilities beyond the limits of the project site for a
subdivision of 3.28 acres of land into 2 parcels in the Very Low Residential District 0ess than 2 dwelling units pet
acre), located on the north side of Hillside Road, east of Moonstone Avenue - APN: 1061-251-24. Staff report
presented by Dan James, Sr. Civil Engineer.
Mayor Stout asked ff staff was recommending what has consisten~y been approved in similar situations.
Dan James, Sr. Civil Engines, felt staff was being consistent.
Mayor Stout wanted to make sure the City is acting consisten~y.
Mayor Smut opened the meeting for public hearing. Addressing the City Council were:
Carl Cobbins, CTK, Inc., presented history on the construction of this project. He also presented pictures
and a drawing for the Council to view. He asked that the undergrounding on Via El Dorado be eliminated
from the conditions of approval
Mr. Golden felt Mr. Cobbins stated everything that needed to be said. He asked that his letter that the
Council had received tonight be made a pan of the record. He did not think anyone would gain anything by
doing all of the undergrounding.
Roland Maninez, Moonstone Lane, stated he did not have a problem with leaving the pules where they are
and did not want the street torn up.
Belly Bowan stated she did not want the guy wires in f~ont of her house. She felt the pules should be left
in place.
Alan Gibson, 5433 Sunstone, did not agree with the undergrounding propusal. He stated be felt the money
should be used to put in something like sewers.
Mayor Stout stated the City does not control sewer installatiOnS.
Jonathon Golden stated this is all about one pule and did not think it would help to develop th~ prol~rty.
He felt the Council should waive the undergrounding of this one pule.
Kevin Daily, 8822 Hillside, stated be did not see what benefit would he achieved by completing all of the
undergrounding. He stated common sense should he used because there was not any value in doing all of
MaryAnn Golden asked that the underg~oonding be waived and that she would be happy to paint the pule
green so it would blend in with the landscaping.
There being no further response, the public heating was closed.
Mayor Stout stated he is in favor of the undergrounding pulicy, bet felt common sense should be used also.
City Council Minutes
March 16, 1994
Page 8
Councilmember Buquet commented on the policy :hut was written and why it was written years ago. He felt a
happy medium should be reached and did not want to compromise the policy by no~ requiring ~he undergrounding of
one pole.
Mayor Stout felt the modif'xcution should be made to underground up to :he pole in question.
Councilmember Gutierrez felt the residents should be able to do whal :hey want with their su'ee~ and felt they should
be given the exemption.
Councilmember Williams stated she also agreed and did not feel this should have come this far.
RESOLUTION NO. 94-051
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DENYING THE APPEAL AND UPHOLDING THE
PLANNING COMMISSION'S DECISION TO DENY A MODIFICATION TO A
CONDITION OF APPROVAL FOR TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 12877, TO
UNDERGROUND THE EXISTING OVERHEAD UTILITIES BEYOND THE LIMITS
OF THE PROJECT SITE, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF HILLSIDE ROAD,
EAST OF MOONSTONE AVENUE, WITHIN THE VERY LOW (LESS THAN 2
DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT AND MAKING
FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 1061-251-24
MOTION: Moved by Stout, seconded by Alexander to approve the underground with :he exception of :he pole in
question and to grant the appeal. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0.
James Markman, City Al~orney, stated this would come back at Ihe next meeting to approve a Resolution Fanring
the appeal.
F2. CONSIDERATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDM~
93.02B - MASI PARTNERS - A request to add Recreational Commercial as a land use designation in the General
Plan and to amend :he land use designation from Industrial Park to Recreational Commercial for 27 ~cres of land
located at the southwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and Rochesler Avenue - APN: 229-011-10, 19, 21, and 26
through 28. Planning Cornmission recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration. Related File: Conditional
User Permit 91-24.
Mitchell Roth, with Mmmerino & Briguglio, stall :hey am asking for the continuance of this matter until the April
6, 1994 meeting per the correspondence sent to the Council.
Mayor Stout asked if there was anyone here tonight U~t could no~ be present at the April 6 meeting.
No response was made.
City Council Minutes
March 16, 1994
Page 9
RESOLUTION NO. 94-052
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 93-
02B, PART A, AMENDING THE GENERAL PLAN TO ADD A NEW LAND USE
CATEGORY OF "RECREATIONAL COMMERCIAL", AND MAKING FINDINGS IN
SUPPORT THEREOF
RESOLUTION NO. 94-053
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, C/d JI:ORNIA, APPROVING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 93-
02B, PART B, AMENDING THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP FROM
INDUSTRIAL PARK TO RECREATIONAL COMMERCIAL FOR 27 ACRES OF
LAND, LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD
AND ROCHESTER AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF -
APN: 220-011-10, 19, 20, 21, AND 26 THROUGH 28
CONSIDERATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIF'IC
PLAN AMENDMENT 94-02 - MASI PARTNERS - A request to modify Subalga 7 to allow limited
cOmmercial on 27 acrcs of land located a~ the southwest c. ome~ of Foothill Boulevard and Rochester Avenue,
APN: 229-011-10, 19, 21, and 26 through 28; and modify the clef'tuition of Automotive Service Courts.
Planning Commission recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration.
ORDINANCE NO. 521 (first reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF TIlE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING INDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC PLAN
AMENDMENT 94-02, AMENDING SUBAREA 7 TO ALLOW LIMITED
COMMERCIAL AND TO MODIFY THE DEFLI~IITION OF "AUTOMOTIVE
SERVICE COURT", AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF
MOTION: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Alexander to continue Item F2 to the April 6 meeting. Motion carried
unanimously, 5-0.
F3. CONSIDERATION OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PRELIMINARY
APPLICATION - FISCAL YEAR 1994/95 - The adoption of the Preliminary Statement of Community
Development Objectives and Projected Use of Funds for the Community Development Block Grant Application for
Fiscal Yea~ 1994/95, based on a grant of $800,000.00. Staff report presented by Cindy Norris, Associate Planner.
Mayor Stout opened the meeting for public heating. Addressing the City Council were:
Denise Osbom, House of Ruth, read information on what services they provide.
Mayor Stout offered a television he had recen~y won to the House of Ruth if they had a use for iL
City Council Minutes
March 16, 1994
Page 10
Kathy Rogers, YWCA, stated she was present at tonight's meeting to seek funds for the prevention
programs for the YWCA in the mount of $7,000.
Lou Shaup, Counselor with Cucamonga Middle School, reported on the problems they experience at the
Middle School.
Joyce Ewing, Pomona Inland Valley Council of Churches, thanked the City Council for all of the support
they have shown her organization.
Then being no further response, the public hearing was closed.
Councilmember Willinrus asked about the $7,000 for the YWCA and wha~ the money would go for.
Kathy Rogers, YWCA, explained that the money would he divided amongst the middle schools for
activities as directed by Council.
Councilmember Willjams asked how many girls they could handle.
Ms. Rogers stated about 15 - 20 is recommended.
Councilmember Gutierrez slated he felt the percentages put into public services is rather low and felt possibly the
Cotmcil should cootribute $7,000 from the capital funds into Ms. Rogen' program.
Councilmember Wiiliams stated she felt this is a good program and has done some research on it.
She hoped that the City could fred $7,000 to try this program for one year.
Mayor Stout stated he did not have any objection in txying this as a pilot program, but did not think money should
be taken out of the capital improvement fund;
Councilmember Willjams felt the money should he used to amphaaize the anti-teen pregnancy progr/un.
Mayor Stout stated that the capital improvement program should he complete within one year and felt the money
should he found from somewhere else.
Councilmember Gutietrez asked Joe O'Neil if the capital projects could still be completed without the $7,000.
Joe O'Neil, City Engineer, stated it would definitely delay the projects that me planned.
Brad Butler, City Planner, felt $7,000 could be found in the capital improvement category if that was Council's
Councilmember Alexander stated be liked this idsa and felt it should be done as a pilot program.
Rick Gomez, Community Development Director, stated staff could bring back informalion on all of the projects in
the capital improvement ~ for the Council to review.
Councilmember Buquet stated he did not think it was appropriate for the Council to allocate money to any
organization, and felt it should go through an organization like United Way to disuibute.
Brad Bullet, City Planner, stated HUD is looking for the Council to approve the Preliminary Statement and that
chang could he made when the final repu~ is made.
City Counc~ Minutes
March 16, 1994
Page 11
Law] Hendetstm, Principal Planner, stated the application needs to be made to HUD by June 1, 1994.
RESOLUTION NO. 94-054
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE PRELIMINARY STATEMENT OF
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVES AND SELECTING PROJECTS FOR
PRELIMINARY FUNDING FOR THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK
GRANT PROGRAM YEAR 1994/95
MOTION: Moved by Stout, seconded by Buquet to app~ve Resolution 94-054. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0.
G. PUBLIC HEARINGS
No items were submitted.
H. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS
No items were submitted.
I. COUNCIL BUSINESS
No items were submitted.
.L IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING
Rick Gomez, Community Development Director, slated that an earlier comment was made that Councilmember
Buquet had canculed a Route 30 meeting. He wanted it clarified that this was a staff decision to cancel the meeting
and not at the direction of Co~mcilmember Buquet ix any other Councilmember. He stated staff canceled it because
staff was not aware of the proximity of the date of the meeting with the public in Victoria and did not want to
fragment the mee~n~ and wanted to give aH of the information at one time.
J1. Councilmember Alexanda' felt the concept of providing information through questionnaires regarding Route 30
through the ACflVE Bulletin should be discussed.
Mayix Stout stated this could be talked about along with the update un this mettcr at the next meeting.
City Council Minutes
March 16, 1994
Page 12
K. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC
No communications were made fxom ~he public.
MOTION: Moved by BuqueL seconded by Alexander to recess to an Executive Session to discuss personnel matters
and pending liligation - Ketner vs Rancho Cucamonga, et al. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0. The meeting
recessed at 8:53 p.m. At the conclusion of the executive session, the Council announced unanimous approval to
renew CO 89-037 and approve clarifying amendment The meeting adjourned at 9:35 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Debra J. Adams, CMC
City Clerk
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
MEMORANDUM
DATE: April 6, 1994
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: Rick Gomez, Community Development Directo
BY: Will .am J. 0 Nell, City Engine
SUBJECT: METROLINK PROJECT
This memo is to advise you that the bids for the Metrollnk Project will
be opened on April 12, 1994, and our recommendation to award will be
before the City Council on April 20, lg94. This is a delay of the award
for approximately two weeks. The reason for this delay is, several
contractors have requested some additional time to bid the project. As
Council is aware the pro~ect is quite complex and the more time the
bidders have the better bids we expect to receive. We do not anticipate
that this delay will impact the schedule.
Any questions may be directed to either nlyself or Joe O'Neil.
RG:WjO:dlw
CiTY QP eANCHD CUCAMONGA
LIST OF MAReANTS
FOR PERIOD: 03-09-94 (93/943
RUN DATES 03/09/94 PAGE~
VENDOR NAME ITEM DESCRIPTION NARR NQ NARR. ANT°
OA CNECKB OVERLAP
6024 CHAPFLEe OZANe RECREATION REFUND 830180 22.50-
(C( 83819 - 84072
BAil WeSTCDTTw KeVZN RECREATION REFUNDS 04073, 22.50-
)GXA eLITE TOUZNG TQUZNG SERVICE eAiS!O TO.OO-
((( 94132 - 84191
2386 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY MAINTERANCE SUPPLIES e 861920 221o38-
((( 84193 - ABEl4
6009 CLOUT LEGXSLATSVE TRIP TO SACTO 843150 IwgS2oSO
((( 84316 - 64318
3604 ECOPP, JiLL EMPLOYEE/COMMUTER OP THE MONTH J 343190 TS,O0
803 BALDY YIEN PUBLIC/PRIVATe COALITION CLOUT MEETING 843200 T2oO0
((( 84321 - E46TI
367 LeAGUe OF CALIF CITIES FINANCIAL MORT, MEETING W46TZe 100.00
<(( 04673 - 046TS )))
2132 ARC LOCK MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 84676 I/SeX!
7 AeLETRONICS MAINTENANCe SUPPLIES e 84611 ZZoSO
30TO ABSOLUTE ASPNALTe INC. MAINTENANCE REPAIRS 84610
6i32 AGITATOR SHOP INC.e THe OUSZNeSS LICENSE REFUND lAGTO A2oOO
3BZ9 ALAR GLASS VEHICLe MAINTENANCE I 86680 3Z3o44
lt)S ALIGNMENT i BRAKE SPECIALISTS VEHICLE MAINTENANCe 0 84681 376o41
6333 ALTA RKNCHD PET G BiRD HOSPITAL BUSINESS LICENSe REFUND 84692 OIoSO
2458 AMERICAN PLANT GROUeRS eUSZNESS LICENSE RePUNO 94613 IQeVe
2693 ANTECH RELIABLe ELEVATOR CO. MONTHLY SERVICE 84684 384°66
26 ASSOCIATEO ENGINEERS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 94683 99leTS
2ART ASSOCIATED PLANTSCAPEISe SAC, MONTHLY MAINTENANCe SERVICE 04686 leAS4oSO
2616 AUTO PARTS CQMPANYe iNC VEHICLe MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES I 14617 2wBSi,T6
402 AUTO NESTORATORS VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 14681 leOoTO
8Al BANK OF AMERICA-CORPORATe ADMINISTRATION Pegs 14689 leSSQ.00
6139 BARNERe JeFF REIMO. PEST CNTOL REGISTRATION 04600 lo.oo
33 eASeLINe TRUE VALUE HARONARE MASHTeRRACe SUPPLIES I 84691 lB.TR
BZZ7 BAYLeSS STATIONERS OFFICE SUPPLIES I 84692 EGODiS
1338 BIG I AUTO PARTS VEHICLE MAINTeNANCe 84693 20086
6IA2 gRAINReDo SUSAN ReCReATION REFUND 14094 23o00
3942 CAL NESTeRR TERMITe PEST CONTROL NONTALl PEST CONTROL SERVICE 0 14093 tOOcOO
937 CALCOMP INC, MONTHLY SERVICE 1460& 320000
lISt CALIFORNIA BUSINESS SYSTEMS OFFICe SUPPLIES 0 0469T IiOoJI
3305 CAROe PaCiFiC CORPORATION MAINTeNANCE/VEHICLE SUPPLIES B 84698 tRIOS.El
40I CARe AMERICA HEALTH PLAN MEOXCAL PREMIUM 04699 IOeR&OolO
6140 CARBON POLVPLASTICS OUS INeSS LICENSe ReFUNOI lAYOO 998°48
4120 CASTLE MOBILE NONe SPECIALIST REHABILITATION PROGRAM 34701 iREDOe
Ale! CMAMPXON REPUNO-CHECK SENT IN ERROR 84TOZ 260e15
6014 CNAPPLew DIANe RECREATION REFUND 14TOS
T3 CITRUS MOTORS ONTARIO, XNC, VEHICLE MAINTENANCe/SUPPLIeS I 84T04 01,20
74 CITY RENTALS EQUIPMINT RENTAL/SUPPLiES I 14YOS lTYoYl
6141 CLIFF'S HOTEL SeMS REGULATIONS HORKSHOF 84706 ITSolD
lEGl CON SeR COMPRNYw ZNCo SERVICe/RePAIRS 1470T 173o83
4119 COMPETITIVe EDGE CYCLENY EQUIPMENT REPAIR 14 TOO 4094
l!O COMPUTER SERVICe CO SIGNAL MAINTENANCe/SUPPLIES B 84709 seSIS.21
643 CONPOTeRLANO COMPUTEI NAZNTENINCE/SUPPLIE$ I 86TiO 3lOISoVA
930 CORONA CLAY COMPANY MAINTENANCe SUPPLIES 84Tit 701.19
CITY OF RANCHO fiDNGA
LIST OF
FOR PERIOD: 03-..-96 (93/94)
RUN DATE: 03/09/94 PAGE:
VENDOR NAME ITEN DESCRZPTIDN VAIN NO HARK. ANTe
· $ CfiECKR OVERLAP
6131 COUNTY OF FEESNa PUDLZCITZON EATIZ 3.50
((( 8AT]3 - 16717
B5 CUCIfiONGA CO MATER DIRT MONTHLY WATER BILLINGS J 86Tie IY,889.Ol
6134 CURTUfA ELECTRONZCS BUSINESS LZCENSe REFUND 84719
284 DAZSY WHEEL RZBBON CO, INC OFFICE SUPPLIES I 86710 SST.2t
355 DANIELS TiRE SERVICE VEHICLE NASNTENKNCE i SUPPLIES SATZI ZIS.TS
2478 DAPPER TZRE VEHICLE fiAZNTEfiAfiCE/SUPPLEES 84TiZ
1295 DATAVAULT - U.So SAFE DEPOSZT COo DATA STORAGE 84723 136.50
7941 DAVIES, ALBERT M. DEPOSit REFUND 84724 IgQOOoeO
3698 DEALERS AUTO TEZN VENZCLE fiAINTENANCE 86~25 S,OO0.O0
6iSS DEERCREEK FiNANCiAL iNC. BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 64726
60 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF CALEF DENTAL iNSURANCE e4TiT
6136 DICKEY JENELERS 8USZNESS LICENSE REFUND 86728 96.iS
109 DICTAPNONE CDRP OFFICE SUPPLiES/REPAIRS I 86729 231,16
IT4 DZETI TONING VEHICLE TONING I. 14T30 TO.OO
6143 OZLLON~ 8RITT OR VICTORIA RECREATION REFUND 84T3I 24°00
6137 DUNN EDNAROB CORP. BUSZNESS LICENSE REFUND 84T32 24.84
6144 DUNNEt LUCZLLE RECREAYSQN REFUND 16TS3 19,00
BZ3 EASTMINI iNC OFFZCE SUPPLSES I 84136 S~211.86
3614 ELITE TONING TOMZNG SERVZCE e IAT3S 216o00
1258 ELLIS9 JANA RE[fAD FOR BUS, RELATED EXPENSE 84736 32.29
511 EMBASSY SUITES NATIONAL LEAGUE OF CITZES MTG. 14/ST
SIl EMBASSY SUITES NATZONIL LEAGUE OF CITIES MTG. RATaS 510.00
2T06 EfiEEGENCY EQUIPMENT SYSTEMS VEfiICLE MAINTENANCE/SUPPLiES 847)9 12.93
3526 EMERGENCY MEDICAL PRODUCTS, iNC. fiAINTENKNCE SUPPLIES IATAO SET.IS
2349 ESGZL CORP. PROFESSIONAL SERVICES RATA! 950.ZT
6138 FAIRCfiILD CDNfiUNECAT ZQN$ SERVSCE$ BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 84142 Z3.OO
2121 FARR'S - RANCHO CUCAMQNGA OFFICE SUPPLIES I 04743
CZTT OF RANCID CUCANQNGA
LIST OF MAWRANTS
FOR PERIOD· 03-09-96 C93/94)
RUN DATE: 03/09/96 PAGE:
VENDOR NAME ZTEN DESCRIPTION NARR ND NARR. ANTE
· , CHECKE OVERLAP
958 NIGGIHSt NARTT C E S E NEETiNGE O 84767 240.00
12444 HOLIDAY inn RESERVATIONS 84T68 ZOO.BE
Z255 HQLT'S AUTO ELECTRIC MAINTENANCE SUPPLEES D D~T69 107.76
L234 HOSEMAN MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 0 847T0 ZERo45
363 NQYT LUMBER COte SoME MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES O 84773 5EO,16
Ig~l HTDRO TEK SYSTEMS~ XNCo EQUXPNENT MAINTENANCE 84772 i3SoOQ
495 HYDRO-SCAPE PRODUCTSt XNC LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES I 04YT3 962°67
IO) Z C N A RETIREMENT TRUST-AS7 DEFERRED COHP 14T74 886,00
4ITZ ZHAGXNG PLUS NAZNTENANCE SUFPLZES 14775 67.67
46 INDUSTRIAL ASPHALT MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES D 04TT6 816.30
3885 iNLAND LAIRMOVER VEHICLE MAINTENANCE I 8477T 1,268.T7
6IZ JAESCHKE SNC.~ CoRE VEH[CLE MAINTENANCE I 84TEl 969°96
SZAZ9 JANANOINt NAUREEN RECREATION REFUND 84779 46.50
leAS9 JDN CONSTRUCTION OUS ZNESS LICENSE REFUND NATDO 5.09
ZDO7 JOHNSON COMPANY, A.F. MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES · 14Tee i02T6.20
IZAAO JOHNBONN MARY ANN RECREATION REFUND 0OTIS Sl.~O
z)e6 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 84T83 E2.ZO
IZA)Z KALANAR, L. RECREATION REFUND 84T84 S.QQ
lZA21 KEARNEYg NARZE eUSINES$ LICENSE REFUND RATES 2E.OO
ZZZO KELLY PAPER CONPANT PAPER SUPPLIES 86186 ~9oSO
lID KHART STORES MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 84787 3ZOOS
iOZ4 KOCH RATEMEALS COMPANY HAXNTENANGE SUPPLIES 84788 126.23
Si443 KOLDE, ROSENRAY D. RECREATION REFUND 84789
32i LANDSCAPE VEST LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE E 04790 09088T.S~
iZA)i LANeENtER CONHIE NECREAllON REFUND 0679i ZIoO0
lAD LAMSON PROOUCTSt ZNCo MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES · 84792 Zm33i°EO
Zi&)8 LEONAROOe DEEBEE RECREAliON REPUNO 86793 16°OO
EZ4)R LEONARDO~ GEORGE RECREAIION REFUNO 84794 i6.00
4iTS LONCAR, PHXL CeEoR.To iNSTRUCTOR D4TD5 100o00
lASS LONG'S DRUGS FiLM PROCESSING NOT96 BE°DE
4iT9 LUJANt GLORY CASH AOVANCE EAT9T
IZ624 MAC DONALOe STEPHEN 8° REFUNDIPANKZNG CITATION PINE 14798 lee. Q0
12422 MAGIC LAMP INN, INC. BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 84799 36.01
7Z MARK CNRSSg iNC. VEHICLE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES O 84800 69.T0
T6 NARKHANtARCZYNSKS,HANSONeL KSNG PROFESSIONAL SERVZCES R 84101 608.00
SZASS NANMOLLIe iRENE RECREATSDN REFUND 66802 SSeO0
SZ44S MARTINt ANRE RECREAIXON REFUND 84903
IZAE6 HARTiRES, KEITN RECREATION REFUNO 06804
3907 NASTER-SORT~ SNCo PIESORT NAIL SERVICES 14105
12442 NEZZNe LUCILLE RECREATION REFUND i 94806 ZtoOO
SI4)S NILLAOO~ TIFFANY RECREATEON REFUND I 84807
BOOS NITCNELL'S NASNTENANCE SUPPLIES O 04800 tIReS6
S2437 MORTONe HELlSEA RECREATION REFUND 04009 SieSO
SZ4ZT NOTOR SERVICE ANNUAL SUDSCRZPTXON 866i0 tE.OO
SZA40 N. BoL.Ao PROFESSIONAL EXCEL NORKSMOP R 060SS ISNoOO
2248 NAPA AUTO PARTS VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 84012 60.06
320Z NAT'L. CRIME PREVENTZON COUNCIL MASNTEMANCE SUPPLIES 64013
2629 NATIONAL BUSINESS HAGHINES MAINTENANCE 048i4 32.33
3HIT NATSDNAL UNIFORM SERVSCE UNSFORR SERVICES I 06015 10192°96
4185 NITERXOER LIGHT SYSTEMS BICYCLE SUPPLIES 66816 im588e60
12AZ8 NUHNt CAROL RECREATION REFUND R 84DIE
CiTY QP SANCHO tONGI
LiST OF
FOR PERiODS OS-O~-VA COS/94)
RUN OATS: 03/09/94 PAGES
VENDOR NINE ZTEN DESCRIPTION MARl NO NARRo ANT.
$0 CHECKR aVERLAP
liAZS NURSERYLING GARDEN CENTEKE,iRE.fEES BUSZNESS LZCENSE REFUND 84118 ZS.OO
365 OLD QUAKER PAINT COHPANV HAXNTENANCE SUPPLIES e S.i9 ITz.ee
lZ42Q OHNX REAL ESTATE SERVICES, iNC. BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 1412Q iS.E)
6Y ON-CALL CORNUNICATZQNS MONTHLY SERVICES 14lZI aS.DO
14lO ONTRRZOe CZTY OF QUAKTERLV OiLLiNG 141ZZ 3e313.T6
SZZA ORANGE COUNTY STRiPiNG SVC~ iNC. STRiPiNG SEEVZCES 14123 geZ31.EO
3643 USAGE ROOFING MAINTENANCE & OPERASIONS 141Z4 213oEO
563 OSTERNAUER COMPRESSOR SERVICE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES O~lZS Ell.Q/
235 OMEN ELECTAXE NAZNTEUANCE SUPPLIES lAIZe IE.tA
i826 PACTEL CELLULAR C8. LULRE PHONE 8iLLENDS 841ZT 406o12
8343 PINSAC NOTARY BOND 141Zl
eASe PATEL, KUNRL RECREATION REFUNDS 84829 24.00
8489 PATEL, NARDiRA RECREATION REFUNDS EAISO 24.00
7S7 PEP BOYS VEHICLE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES I 'SALES ZtO.ZZ
1079 PHOTO HOUSE OF CALIFORNIA PHOTO SUPPLIES I 84132 iS,IT
2T2 PITNEY BONES POSTAGE NETEl EENTIL e 14133
791 PHZ/OELTI CAKE HEDICAL INSURANCE 14lea
8490 POLICE ACTION REVZEH CONSULTANTS SUEZHESS LZCENSE OEFUNDS eASaS SE.OO
2SS PONA OZSTRTBUTSUG CO VEHICLE HAZNTSNANCE S SUPPLIES I 841S6 16e6TIoTO
IOA9 POMONA VALLEY KAUASAKI VEHICLE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES e 8lIST lIT.Z/
3See PRiNCiPAL MUTUAL HEDZCKL/DZSReZLITV iNSURANCE 14131 AeRIES,El
lAY4 PRINT SOUKCEe Tee OFFICE SUPPLIES 84139 ZSo6Z
65 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES I 8414Q
((( 1414S - O414Z
ZSI R i R AUTOROTZVE VEHICLE NAiNTeSUPPLXESiSIIVECE e 14~3 Stele. DO
1190 R i R LIGHTING MAINTENANCE SERViCE/SUPPLiES lACeD Zie,OT
2705 RoH.Fo, iNCo VEHICLE HASNT SERViCEISUPPLIE$ 84149 54°0 O
eats RAGUSA· JENNIFER RECREATION REFUNDS 14146 15.OO
2Z8 RANEND CUCA KEOEVELOPNENT AGENCY REIMBURSE GRANT FUNDS OAIAT 7iE,OT
626 OAULS TKUCK TiRE SERVICE TiRE REPAIR I 841~1 4t6oTI
4leo RAN LOCK t NeT SERVICE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 14149 O.Dt
1165 RXCNKROSON AUTO ROOY~ XNCo VEHICLE MAINTENANCE I 141EO GOGGle
276 RIVEKSIOE 8LUEPRZNT PRINTS S 141E~ ISS,SI
4EGO ROAD HACHINERYt SNCo MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 14 gel
3i34 RUBSHe JACK t SONS, iNC. MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES g lAlES
4K4 S C C C A .flEETiNG 141S4 SOLO0
VKB SAFETY KLEIN CORP MAINT SUPPLIES I 14lee
II61 SAFENAY SiGN KEPLACIRENT OF SIGNS 14156 EeliSlES
8its SALEADO CONSTRUCTSON BUSINESS LICENSE OEPUNDS 14let
l)7O SALSSRURYe TON Jo RECREATZON REFUNDS I 84858 13Toil
12V8 SAN BERN CO ASSESSOR 'S OFFICE SUBSCRIPTION 848E9 !tO40,OO
IZSO SAN BERN CO LIBRARY OCTOOER SHREDDING IA860 ZSwOOO,OO
SYS SAN BERN CO OFFICE OF fiNGeNT SVC TILEPROCESSING SERVICES 14161 219.00
305 SAN BERN COUNTY TRANSPORTATION/FLD AGREEHINT FLOOO CONTROL lARDs ilIAD,D6
iJl SAN DIEGO ROTARY BROOM COt XNE HAXNT SUPPLIES f 84963 SIEGEl
53B SEEPLEe JUDY INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 14864 ZOS,OO
8494 SEPULVEDAe NAKK RECKEATION REFUNDS 14865 SSoOO
loll SETCON RAINTIMINGS SUPPLIES 84864
R49S SHUFORO, BARDIRA RECREATION REFUNDS 84667 3SoOO
8496 SXGNATUKE OOCUNENTATXON SERVICE BUSINESS LICENSE REPUNOS E4868 S,V2
36 SHEDIRKS, 8El PETTY CASH - COMMUNITY SVCS g 84669 lO4.I2
CITY OF RANCNG CUCANQNGA
LIST OF NAnRANTS
FOR PERIODS 03-09-96 (93/96)
RUN DATES 03/09/96
VENDOR NAME ITEM DESCRIPTION eARN NO UARR. ANT.
89 CHECKI OVERLAP
319 SO CALIFGAS CO. MONTHLY GAS GILLS 84ETO lO¢.5Z
I&32 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON HONTHLT ELECTRIC DILLS I 14874 3Ze237e32
6262 STAR FLIGHT ENTERTAINMENT RECREATION DEPOSIT 14879 250°00
3569 SUMN[T GRADING g PAVINGf [NeD HIGHLANDSROCHESTER STR IMPROT E4176 IeOOO.O0
e&D7 SUN RAMS PROOUCTSw ZNCo BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 84677 )OoOO
8498 SUNGLASS OXSPLAY CO., ZNCo 6USEHESS LICENSE REFUNDS 84878 SO.O0
8699 SUPERCUTS BUSINESS LECENSE REFUNDS 86879 60°00
8692 SVH METAL PRODUCTS BUSINESS LICENSE REFUNDS E4E80 I6o4S
3733 TON HORLO CONVERSEOMEN LTOo VEHICLE NRINT SUPPLIES/SERVICE 848EI 6ToSO
693 UoSo/HHZTE VAN 6ATTERT CD.t INC. VEHICLE MAINTENANCE SUPPLEES E4SIZ
2956 UHPS ARE US ASSOCIATION UNP SEEVICES I 848E3 2eOT8oOO
eSOO UNXTAG RENIAL SERVXCES~ INC, BUSINESS LICENSE REFUNDS' 84994 6,00
8SOZ UNITED FIRE L SAFETY CO. SUEZHESS LICENSE REFUNO$ 86815 43.70
i226 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE UPS SERVICE 14896 3SOoOO
3612 VIKIHG OFFICE PRODUCTS OFFICE SUPPLIES I 848ET 379.61
&99 VISION SERVICE PLAN - (CA) MONTHLY VISION SERVICE BILLING 84088 SeO&[.T6
leO3 VISTA PAINT HAXNT SUPPLIES e 84899 960.37
418 HARREN A CO,~ CARL LIABILITY CLAIMS e 84890 1e876o20
213 MAXEEl KLEEH-LXNE CORP NAINT SUPPLIES I 84891 ZtOJSoO6
~522 ME TIP CITY COUNCIL AD 84992 3SOoOQ
C[TV UP RANCHQ CUCARUNbA
LIST QF NABRANTS
FOR PERIOOZ 03-16-94 (93/94)
RUN OATEZ 03/16/96 PAGE:
VENDOR NINE ITEM DESCRIPTION NARd NO NARd. ANT.
$$ CHECMI OVERLAP
IZZT5 OS/2 NAGRZZNE SUBSCRIPTION 1ZRSRe 29.95-
CO( 82899 - 84528
3S04 ECOFFw JILL ENPLOVEE/CDNNUTER OF THE MONTH I 145288 SSOoSI
4(( 14930 - 14672 )))
436 FULNOODt JERIV 8. CASH ADVANCE NTO [M SiN DIEGO 146TIe IO0oO0
((( 14ST4 - 14~06 )))
I I S I EQUIPMENT RENTALS CO., INC. VEHICLE MAINTENANCE/SUPPLiES 1
<(< 84108 - 8488 )>)
IO A A R TIRE SERVICE VEHZCLE RAINTENANCE I 84~09 tRIOSoS8
6149 l-I COAST TENPDRARV SERVICE BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 841t0 144o00
8 I.C.E. OFFECE SUPPLIES DPFICE SUPPLZES I laYIt SSB.T4
2T32 IRC LOCI NBZHTEHANCE SUPPLIES I 14912 Ie04Zo66
4144 ABEROEEN GRQUPe THE PUBLICATIONS 14V13 ITSol)
6i50 ALBRECHTSEN, ELIZABETH RECREATION REFUND 148t4 )OoOO
6t5I ALCALI, SAlT RECREATION REFUND 84915 SVoO0
409 AMERICAN EXPRESS ANERICRN EXPRESS BILLINGS
2906 AHEBECAN THERMOPLISTIC COMPANY OFFICE SUPPLIES 14911
4079 AMERICAN VEMICLES VEMICLE NBIHTENRNCE/SUPPLZES R 84tie !SQ.S8
2693 IHTECH RELIIeLE ELEVATOR CO. NOHTHLT SERVICE 84919 leO.DO
7983 ARNI AnNA HQNTHLT NEETINS IIBZQ 99.QQ
ZSI6 AUTO PANTS CONPANYw iNC VEHICLE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES I 849Zi IST.IS
4OZ AUTO NESTORATORS VEHICLE HAZNTENANCE 84922 709°52
1061 ANAROS RT CHAMPION ENGRAVED PLAQUE I 149Z3 )eST7ol3
841 BANK OF AMERICA-CORPORATE AOHZNISTRATION FEES 14924 SSQ.OO
33 81SELZNE TNUE VALUE HARDURGE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES R 84929 173.83
)ZZT RAYLESS STATIONERS OFFICE SUPPLIES 8 eelIs TBSoBI
ISil BIG A AUTO PARTS VEMICLE MAINTENANCE I 84927 143.96
iZeT eLAKE PAPER CO., inC. NECNEBTION SUPPLIES 86~Z8 9T.?I
6iSZ BTARSe TAYLON RECREATION NEFUND 84829 SOoO0
3104 DTTEL CORPORATION SUBSCRIPTION 14130 69°00
2694 C i H DiSTRiBUTORS OFFICE SUPPLIES ISlSI lSeoZS
8ST C R G MElTiNG A AiR CONDiTiONING NAINTERAKE SERViCe I 84132 649e50
3942 CIL UESTERN TERMITE PEST CONTROL NQNTHLT PEST CONTROL SERVICE I 14933 )BQ.OQ
997 CALCOMP INC. NONTHLT SERVICE le~)S SIZ.OO
))OS CARDE PACIFIC CORPORATION MAiNTENANCE/VEHICLE SUPPLIES 14935 79.92
STSI CELSOC PROFESSZONIL SERVICES t
68 CENTRRL CITIES SIGN SERVICE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 84937 ZeS.6T
)SZZ CHINBEG OF CONfiERCE MEMBERSHIP FEES/~ONTNLT MTGS 141S8 60.00
T) CITRUS NOTOBS ONTARZOw iNC. VEHICLE MAiNTENANCE/SUPPLiES R 849S9 SZO.6S
~14 CLAREMOaT CAMERA SUPPLZES/SERVZCES I 84~0
4119 COMPETITIVE EDGE CYCLERT EQUIPdENT REPAIR 844)~Z 23.47
649 CONPUTERLANO COMPUTER MAINTENANCE/SUPPLIES
41TO COOL PROMOTIONS OFFICE SUPPLIES 849~3 I88,12
((( 84944 - 84945
85 CUCANONGA CO tATER GIST HONTHLY ~AT~R BILLINGS e 84946 6,~iZ,Zl
355 OANZELS TiRE SERVICE VEHICLE MAINTENANCE ~ SUPPLIES
$OZ OEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION TRAFFIC SIGNAL MAINTENANCE 66~8 6e946,66
~07 OETCO OFFICE SUPPLIES I
523 EASTMINt [NC OFFICE SUPPLIES I 84950 606.64
2422 ELECTRONICS kiRE~OUSE ELECTRONIC SUPPLIES 6~9SZ 6ZeZS
CO,~ ZNC. HAINTENANCE SUPgS 84952 30.65
T OK RANJCUCAHDNGA
CZ YLIST QF ANTS
FOR PERlOOt -16-9A (93/94) ~..
RUN OATE: 03/I6/94 PAGE: 2
VENDOR NANE ITEN OESCRXPTION UARR NO NARD. AHT.
e$ CHECKA OVERLAP
4OBl EHFSRE FORD VEHICLE HRZNTENAIECE BARBS
ITS4 EXECUTIVE PRODDAN PUDLICRTZQNS 14RS6
212I FARO'S - RANCOD CUCAHQNGA OPFSCE SUPPLIES IABSS 62.58
IZS FEDERAL EXPRESS COOP OELZVERV SERVICE O 84956 SO.S0
IS4 FENCE CRAFT QF UPLANDw INC. CONTRACT SERVSCES 1695T S6.46
6154 PEeRADO, TIFFANS HONE OCCUPATION PEONET REPUHO 149SO S3.OO
2840 FORD OF UPLAND, iNC. VEHSCLE MiNTENAKE I 16959
3992 GIOBT'S FENCING RATEDiALS nAE NTE·ANCE SUPPLIES 14960 337°00
139 GLOeAL CONFUTED SUPPLieS QPPSCE SUPPLZES 16i61 SO.SO
4016 GOANTe NITA ZNSTROCTOO POT 16t6Z Z6ZoSO
491 GRAVES AUTONOTEVE SUPPLY MAINTENANCE SUPPAtES 96163 OG,3S
4131 GSC PASSON 'S SPORTS RECREATION EQUZPHENT 94564 ION.El
t3T GTE CALIFORNIA NQNTHLV TELEPHONE BILLINGS · 14965 6,SAZ.O6
ZOSS HAVEN NINE G LSQUOD CO. SUB-CQNHZTTEE HEETZNGS e OAR6 66.84
ZZSS HOLT'S AUTO ELECTRIC HAENTENANCI SUPPLieS 1GOT
161 HOTT LUHOER CO., SoH. NAZNTENRNCE SUPPLieS g 14~61 ISG.GT
1942 HTORQ TEN STSTENSt INC. EQUIPHiNT NDINTENANCE 86t69 IOl.O3
495 NVDRQ-SCAPE FRQDUCTSt ZNC LANDSCAPE NASNTEHANCE SUPPLIES I 149TO SO.tl
16T I C B Q - CITRUS BELT CHAPTER HAENTERANCE SUPPLIES IGBTE ZS.OO
46 XNOUSTRIAL ASPHALT NAENTENAECE SUPPLIES O 149Ti Y9O.69
40 TNLANO FACTORS HAINTENAKE SUPPLIES 869TS ~S.OO
3185 INLAND LANN~ONER VEHZCLE HASNTENANCE O 14974 lTD.49
907 INLANO HEOZATIQN BQARO LANQLORD/TENANT DISPUTE · 149YS
IZ2 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETin AOVERTISZNG · 14976
6IS JAESCHKE INC., C.n. VEHICLE HAINTENANCE 861TT 169.40
lie9 AMP TiLECON INC. TELEPHONE SERVICES 16RYe ZZS.13
609 RAnKNEt STEZNER t UNGERER PROFESSIONAL SERVICES IG~TO
Z2Ai8 KAPADIA, KAVI RECOEAllON OEFUNO 14RIO 4l.OO
SAIl RHAPP SHOE CONPANT SAFETY SHOES 16ill 98.69
!OZ4 KOCH HATEDIALS CONPANT HAINTENANCE SUPPLIES I 1491Z lOS.Z6
193 LAZRO CONSTRUCTION CO PDOFeSSSONAL SERVICES 14913 /etZO.lO
3339 LAKESHORE LEARNING HATEDIALS RECREATION SUPPLIES 04904 4ZZ.T6
)IS LANDSCAPE NEST LANDSCAPE NASNTEOANCE I 16¶10
849 LANSON PRODUCTS, EHC. HAZNTENANCE SUPPLZES O 14986
IZ44T LLOYD, COURTNET RECREATION REFUND O 14¶81 60.00
4ITS LONCAR~ PHIL CoE.R.T. INSTRUCTOR 84998
4119 LONG REACH UNZFODN CO.t INC. 6 UHITE NONGOOSE BICYCLES R4919
4106 LUNO EQUZPHENT COt ZNC. NAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 14990 43.39
3S6T RARER! SSGN COHPANYw INC. HAZNTENANCE SUPPLIES eDitS
549 HARIPOSA HQRIICULTURAL iNToINC. LANDSCAPE HAINTENANCE O 14~E
S49 HARZPOSA HORTICULTURAL iNToINC. LANDSCAPE NAZNTENANCE , I 14193 ISS.O0
TZ HARK CHRISe INCo VEHSCLENAZNTENANCE SUPPLIES 14¥M6 ZOoAO
?6 NARKNAN~ARCZTNSKZwHANSONeA KING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES O 04905
4101 NARRIOTT HOTEL - ONTARIO AIRPORT VOLUNTEER RECOGNITION PRODRAN 86996 JOe.aS
ZSO NAATIHEZ UNION SERVICE TOYING SEREICES 16¥PY 40cOO
IOZS HC NABTEA-CARe SUPPLY COOPANY NAINTENANCE SUPPLIES O 14fib
149 NEJAC ALARN COOPANY ALADN SERVICES eatANt 5ZS.OQ
12446 HIAANONYE APARTHiNTS BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND RSHO ZSeSY
3ROt HITCHELL'S HAINTENAECE SUPPLIES eSOOS
lie MOUNTAIN veer SHALL END. REPAIR MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES e eSQOZ ),6OS.O9
C(( ESOO3 - eSOO3
LIST OF HA·RANTS
FOR PERIOD: 03-16-94 (VS/945
RUN DATE: OI/16/OA PAGE:
VENDOR NAME ITEM DESCREPTZON NRRR NO MiRa. ART.
$, CNECKI OVERLAP
2lab NRPA AUTO PARTS VEHICLE MAINTENANCE · 85004 hi29.ZS
ZIII NATIONAL FIRE PROTECTION ASSQC. HANDBOOKS eSOOS 55.QQ
3437 NATIONAL UNIFORM SERVICE UNIFQRN SERVICES I 8SQQ6 81. IT
ASS NIXON-ROLE EQUIPMENT VEHICLE MAINTENANCE · 8SOOT 41T.19
35A6 NURSERYLAND LANOSCmPE SUPPLIES 8SO OR zS.II
6ED QCE-BNUNINGm ZNC. OCE MACHINE MAINTENANCE DSOO9 ZSOoSU
3632 OLDTIMERS FOUNDATION OLDTIMERS FOUNDATION D5010
iS2 QNNITRANS BUS PASSES DSQII
6T ON-CALL CONNUNICATIONS MONTHLY SERVICES e DSOI2 IDA.OR
26AO ·N-CALL COMMUNICATIONS NONTNLT SERVICES A DSO!3
122T5 OS/Z MAGAZINE SUBSCRIPTION DSOI4
255 OVEN ELECTRIC MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES e ODORS
iRE) PAGENET PAGING SERVICE ESOI6 63°00
RID PARAGON EUILOZNG PRODUCTS INCo CONCRETE SUPPLIES · iSOtT 229.19
)6)T PARNELLe TiN CERT INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 8SOle 2SOoOQ
8505 PADCALEB 8RITE RECREATION REFUNDS 85019 5Z.OO
7ST PEP BOYS VEHICLE NAENTENANCE SUPPLIES f 89020 SSToD5
8506 PEREZRA, STEVEN RECREATION REPUNOS 89021 2OSoZ6
1079 PHOTO HOUSE UF CALIFORNIA PHOTO SUPPLIES I 89022
3it PIGONE PLUNRING CORPORATION PLUNBING REPAIR S SUPPLIES ISOZS 108.31
542 PiP PRINTING RECREATION SUFPLIES 85024 Ii6o26
8507 PLASTECH NINUFACTURING BUSINESS LICENSE REFUNDS DDOZ9 ZTeOO
ZS5 FOnA OISTRIBUTING CO VEHICLE NAZNTENANCE t SUPPLIES J DSQZ6 U,QZI.ET
IOi9 PONDNA VALLEY KAVASAKE VEHICLE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES · ISOZT h!TA.23
ZIAO PRESERVATION FORUM HINge·SHIP 85029
65 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY NAINTENANCE SUPPLIES I 85029 I6Zo83
959 RADIO SNACK ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE BUS[MESS LICENSE REFUNO 85030 I8o3I
IDOl NALPNS GROCERY CO NO. iS BUSINESS LSCENSE REFUNDS DROSS AG.0Q
2OT RRNCNO MiNI STORAGE NZNI 510RRGE e 85032 /SO.OO
626 RAULS TRUCK TIRE SERVICE TIRE REPAIR · DSOSS lit.33
4I)O ROe LOCK G KEY SERVICE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 95034 DoOR
8509 REGISTER CLASSIFIED ADVERTISING SUBSCRIPTION OgOSS
1169 RiCNAROSQN AUTO BOOYm INCo VEHICLE NAINTENANCE · eSODS 1,321.T8
2T6 RIVERSIDE BLUEPRINT PNINTS I 8SQ)T
2084 SAFECO LIFE INS. CO. GROUP IONIN. MEDICAL iNSURANCE DSO)E TOES/
214 SAN DERN CO SOLID HASTE NGNENT MONTHLY SERVICE DR039
3092 SIN DERNARDINO COUNTY DOCUMENTARY HANDLING FEE 8SO&O 3O.OO
13Z SAN DIEGO ROTARY ·ROOM COt INC NAINT SUPPLIES BROIL
lID9 SEAL FURNITURE S SYSTEMS INC. OFFICE SUPPLIES eB042 9IS.OR
ZtD5 SETON ZOENIZFICATION PRODUCTS MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES J D30~3 tea. SO
2507 SLIDE ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROLS SERVICE/SUPPLIES 95044.4 !e·2OoOO
4049 SIGNAL MAINTENANCE~ INC. TRAFFIC SIGNAL PROS EST IX 85045
)IT6 SINCLAIR PAINT MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES DSO46 DIDBIT
13IT SNART& FINAL DAY CAFP SUPPLIES A DSO47 462°70
((( 8SO&S - 83049
3IT SO CALIF EDISON CO. NONTHAT ELECTRIC OILLZNGS e 85049 T3e6TSo6T
319 SO CALZF GAS CO. MONTHLY GAS BILLS I 85050 leOEGo99
((( DROOl - eROS6
I4)Z SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EOXSDN MONTHLY ELECTRIC DILLS e DSOST
32Z $PARRLETTS MONTHLY SERVICE eSOSe 5/.OO
MUFFLER INC. VEHICLE MAENT SU IS/SERVICE 85059 RS.RD
CIIY QF RANC UCANQNGA
LIST QF
FOR PERZQDZ b_-Z6-VA C93/94)
RUN OATE~ 03/I6/94 PAGE:
VENDOR NANE ITEM DESCRIPTION HARM NO HARM. AHT.
,e CHECKA OVERLAP
6A6 STANDARD ZNSURANCE CO. ZNSURAHCE PREHZUH RE060 STS.ZO
646 ETAHOARD INSURANCE CO. INSURANCE PREMIUM 85061 lOToDD
30S8 STATE OF CALIFQMHIA UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK RSQ6Z lOB.Z6
8512 SUMMIT BUILDERS OEPOSZT REFUND 85063 1,000.00
2344 TARGET YOUTH PROGeRM & OAT CAMP SUPPL 85064 TI.Z4
836 TARGET SPECIALTY PRODUCTS HAINT SUPPLIES E 85069 IeIQ6oOS
SYSS TON HOBLD CDNVERSIQNSe LTD. VEHICLE NAZNT SUPPLIES/SERVZCE R 89066 69S.01
350 UoSo POSTMASTER POSTAGE LANDSCAPE HENSLETTER RSOST TS.OO
693 UoS./NHITE VAN BATTERY CODe ZHC° VEHICLE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 85063 44°99
2958 UMPS ARE US ASSOCIATION UHP SERVICES 0 RS06t 144.00
489 UPLRNUe CITY OF NONTHAT VATEl BEGLING RROTO 11o44
8510 VILLAw VVONNE RECREATION REFUNDS RSOYl SO.O0
667 VISA VZSA NQNTHLT BILLINGS '.0 eSOT2 41loZl
1103 VISTA PAINT HAINT SUPPLIES I RIOT3 803.41
2340 VORTEX INDUSTRIES HAINT SERVICE t NEPRIRS I 89014 IDIOT6
ZQSZ MeGNED PACIFIC INC. SURVEY SERVICES eSOTS Ie630.QQ
476 NAnMEN S CO.w CARL LZAeZLITT CLAIMS e ISOT6 441.20
213 NAXZE~ KLEEM-LINE CORP NAINT SUPPLIES R IRQTT leQQe.3Q
1941 HERTERN TURF L COHHERCIAL HAINT SUPPLIES 8 RSOTe MR.41
ZlZ HILLDAN ASSOCIATES PROFESSZONAL SERVICES I RSQT9 ZO,491.SQ
4194 NILLI ARSON g SCHNID ENGINEERING SERVICES I 8SORO 31e499.TZ
TSR HITS DECREACTION SUPPLIES R IRONS 229°94
94 HOLFINRARGE8 INCee OeF. LANOSCAPE SUPPLIES I ESORZ 29So66
8511 HOMACKe LATHE RECREAllON REPUNOS liON3 ZOoO0
509 XEROX CORPORATION COPY HAGHIRE SUPPLIES/SERVICE I 89084 4,993035
ee TOTAL 3340102.90
CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONGA
LZST OF WARRANTS
FOR PERIO0: 03-Z3-g& (93/94)
CITY OF RANCHD CUCANOHGA
LiST OF UARRANTS
FOR PERZOO: 03-23-9A C93/963
RUN DATE: OS/iA/OA PAGE:
VENDOR NAHE ITEH DESCRIPTION NARR NO NARRo AHT.
· e CNECKI OVERLAP
4005 RRUEE L KRUIE CONSTRUCTION i END. PROGlaSS ESTIMATE li 85115 80,908.20
12462 KNANG DeJU GARDENZHG SUSanaSS LICENSE REFUND EELS6 El. DO
lZ46A L.A. BASIN CHAPTER Z,C.B,Qo DISASTER RESPONSE NEETONG 8SLIT SSoQO
3091 LRRKEN, DAVE INSTRUCTOR PATHaNT 8518R ei.EO
3091 LARKIRe DAVE INSTRUCTOR PAYMEHT O ester TIN.DO
ilASt LAS HHDLESRLE INC. BUSINESS iNCENSE REFUND aside t,93
849 LANSON PRODUCTSt SNC. HAZNTENNKE SUPPLIES 8539S 2OE,4S
leaS! LEE, HARGUERITE RECREAISON REFUND E3192 IZoOO
9T9 LENin HONES REFUND OF OEEELQPHENT FEES DOlt3
AiTl LIGHTHOUSE PUBLICATIONS ENVZEDNHENTAL L NTR RESOURCES ESZ94 SO.IS
3i36 LU'S LZGHTNOUSEe INC. OiL ANALYSIS OStRE 450°00
600 LVNCHe JANiE RECREATION SUPPLEaS 83196 34°86
1062 n C Z TELECONHUliXCATIONS TELEPHONE 5ERVZCES g lOIre 414,73
956 HRC DONALD, iAIN SNSTRUCTQN PAYMENT · gEltl 396.9Q
722 HAGALLANES, LINER ZNSTRUCTOR PATHaNT 83199 399.3Q
349 HAREPOOR HORTICULTURAL ENT.ZNCo LANDSCAPE HAINTENRNCE J 85ZOQ IZeOSO,Q6
T2 HARK CHRIS, ZNC. VENECLE aNENTaMERCE SUPPLZES d 85201 IAS~46
I2463 HARKS CAOLEVZSZON REFUND/OVOTZNE ZNSPECTZQN SSZO2 IT.19
2727 HARE, HZCNAEL ZNSTRUCTOR PAYMENT E5~3 369.55
12457 NIN CORP. BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 95204 It.90
lOIS NC RASTER-CARE SUPPLY CONPANT HAZNTENANCE SUPPLEaS OIZOO
602 HEYERe PAT REINSUREaNENT FOR SUPPLIES ESZ06 390°00
4ida RIDDLESEX OFFICE SUPPLY, INC. MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES I 8SZOT I22,52
SQST HILLS, RARE INSTRUCTOR PATHaNT 83208 tIT.NO
259T HZNNESOTA eaSTERN HAZNTENANCE SUPPLIES I lIED9 3,149.0G
596Q ROLONEYt JIM iNSTRUCTOR PATHaNT 8SAID ERE.QI
12486 NORRAN, GLORIA RECREATZQN REFUND ISZii IZ.OQ
403 NORTON COATINGS, inC. - BAUER HAZNTERANCE SUPPLIES gSZl2
3333 HOTT, SYLVIA iNSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 85Zi3 eloOO
Ail N O I HAXNTENANCE CONTRACT ESZ!4 !e)Z6.0O
073 N S S/LORRY FOOTHILL MARKETPLACE 85215 DOT°SO
4IT4 NATIONAL AROORISTS ASSOCIATION MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 85216
3437 HATZQNAL UNZFORH SERVICE UNIFORM SERVICES I 852iT 442,TO
3693 NATIONHIDE ROeALE HONE REHAB. PROGRAM 8SZie
DOS& NICHOLS, FREO INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 15219 DIE°DO
3332 NICKLEE, ARLIEEH iNSTRUCTOR PATHaNT OIZ20 TleO0
3TED NORHEINe HAROLD INSTRUCTOR PATHaNT OSZZt 8T.SO
4048 OLD HICKORY CONSTRUCTION C~AFFEV GARCZA DARN COMET. ESEZE
SIT OLYMPIC STUOZOS, [Ned INSTRUCTOR PATHaNT ESZI3 SITOSeZ8
ii4S8 ONE STOP SECRETARZAL& TYPING SVC. BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND; 05224
3964 ONTARIO ICE SKATING CENTER INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT SIZES itZeZO
IZZA ORANGE COUNTY STRIPING SECt ZNC, STRiPiNG SERVICES 85216 lt)OtoOO
3933 PICZFXC COAST AIR TOOL MAINTENANCE SUPPLEaS 85221 S0o42
338 PACiFiC EQUIPT & iRRiGATiON, INC. HAiNTERANCE SUPPLIES 85228 3.DO
el8 PARAGON BUILDING PRODUCTS INC. CONCRETE SUPPLIES i 852Z9 TO.ON
8318 PETERSONe JUDY RECREATION REFUNDS 852)0 I2.OO
2Tlt PORCHRUDe JANICE iNSTRUCTOR PiERENT 8SZaZ l/O.id
ZeIZ POSTAGE BY PHONE POSTAGE METER HONEHLY SERVICES D3232
asia PRENTZS$~ BETH RECREATION REFUNDS 8S233 56°70
65 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES e 65234 leO.T6
I03g e J e DESIGN GROUP, XNC, PROFESSIONAL SERVICES e 85235 Zit4O4o30
CITY OF RANCHO C INGA
LIST OF UKR~
FOR PERIODS O)
RUN OATE~ 03/Z4/96 PAGES
VENDOR NINE ZTEN DESCRIPTION UAKR NO NARRo ANT,
$e CHECKN OVERLAP
402S R J SUPPLY CO. NAZNTENANC! SUPPLIES esz36 34.oo
eStS RAGUSAt JENNIFER RECREATION REFUNDS 85237 tD.O0
6Z6 RAULS TRUCK TIRE SERVZCE TIRE REPAZR I KSZ36 263.00
36IX RE-PRSNT CORPORATION OFFICE SUPPLIES 6SZ)9
S&S RED NZNG SHOE STORE SAFETY ~ODTS 65260 150o00
CZTY OF RANCHO CUCARONGA
LEST OF NXRRANTS
FOR PER/DO: 03-23-9A C93/96)
RUN OATE: Q3/24/9~ PAGE:
VENDOR NINE [TEN OESCIIPTZQN MARR NO UAIR. ANT,
$s CHECKI OYERLAP
509 XEROX CORPORATZON COPY NICNINE SUPPLIE$/SERVZCE 88287 A~9o6S
8526 YARBOUGN, ANTHONY RECREATEON REFUNOS 85288 46.50
Re TOTAL 299,117.65
The unders~ne~ II~reby a~s f~'
iTIS~911OlUIUflizi3~4 S 6
~d~o Cu~on~a~ 91739
SiGN HErE '~; mr es i/alden ............................................................
APPLICATION BY ~ANSRROR
I
Do Not Write Belmv This Litw; For De/~rtment Use
'15
CHUCK'S DINER
8890 8th Street
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
CHUCK'S DINER IS LOCATED ON THE Northwest Corner of Vineyard Avenue
and 8th Street in Subarea i of the [ndustria] SDecific Plan. The
land use designation is General Industrial. The business is a
permitted use in this Subarea.
Zoning of Adjacent Properties:
North: General Industrial, Subarea 1 of the Industrial Specific Plan
South: City of Ontario, Residential
East: General Industrial, Subarea 2 of the Industrial Specific Plan
West: General Industrial, Subarea i of the Industria| Specific Plan
16 J
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ~
STAFF REPORT :~: ~
DATE: April .6, 1994 ':-::-. LF~
To: .ayor and .embers of t.e City Co..ci
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
BY Mike Olivier, Sr. Civil Engineer
SUBJECT: APPROVAL TO APPROPRIATE $163,210 FROM FUND 10 (PROP. 111)
"ROCHESTER AVENUE/RANCHO CUCAMONGA HIGH SCHOOL MITIGATION
PROGRAM" TO PAY CONSTRUCTION COSTS PERTAINING TO THE ROCHESTER
AVENUE LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS ALONG THE EAST SIDE PARKWAY.
RECOI~ENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council approve an appropriation of $163,210.
from Fund 10 "Prop. 111" for the Rancho Cucamonga High School Mitigation
Program - for the construction of Landscape Improvements a]ong the Rochester
Avenue Eastside Parkway, from Victoria Park Lane to Highland Avenue, Account
No. 10-4637-9315.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
On March 17, 1994, the California Transportation Commission approved funding
for the Rochester Avenue/Rancho Cucamonga High School Mitigation Program.
Funds for the project are from an allotment of the State Prop.
Environmental Enhancement and Mitigation Program. CTC approved $163,210.
toward the Rochester Avenue Landscape Improvements and RDA has budgeted
$93,800, from the Regional Projects Fund, 11-51000, for design and
administration.
This appropriation will not impact any projects City Councll previously
approved in the FY 93/94 Budget.
Respectfu submit.
William J~nl
City Engineer
WjO:CB:ly
: . 17
CITY OF RANCH0 CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: April 6, 1994
TO: Mayor and Hembets of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City btanager
FROM: Will Jam J. O'Neil, City Engineer
BY Llnda R. Beek, Junior Engineer
SUBJECT: AUTHORIZE THE ADVERTISING OF THE "NOTICE INVITING BIDS" FOR THE
ROCHESTER AVENUE RANCHO CUCANONGA HIGH SCHOOL MITIGATION
PROGRAN - FOR THE LANDSCAPING OF ROCHESTER AVENUE EASTSIDE
PARKWAY, FROM VICTORIA PARK LANE TO HIGHLAND AVENUE, TO BE
FUNDED FROM RDA, ACCOUNT NO. 11-51000 ($60,000) AND FUND 10
ACCOUNT NO. 10-4637-9319 ($163,000)
REC~MDATIOM
It is reconmeended that the City Council approve plans and specifications for
Rochester Avenue - Rancho Cucamonga High School mitigation program - for the
landscaping of Rochester Avenue eastside parkway, from Victoria Park Lane to
Highl and Avenue and approve the attached resolution authorizing the City Clerk
to advertise the "Notice Inviting Bids".
BN:XGROUND/AJiN.YSIS
The subject project plans and specifications have been completed by staff and
approved by the City Engineer. The Engtneer's estimate for construction is
$223,000. Legal advertising is scheduled for April 12 and April 19, 1994,
with the bid opening at 2:00 P.M. on Thursday, April 26, 19q4.
Respectfully submitted,
Will lain J. Otl~
City Engineer
WJO:LRB:d~w
ROCHESTER AVENUE
RANCHO CUCAMONGA HIGH SCHOOL
MITIGATION PROGRAM
FOR THE LANDSCAPING OF
ROCHESTER AVENUE EASTSIDE PARKWAY
I
.::' .~ . .~:-.~
I .~.~.
VICINI~ MAP .-
LOCATION MAP
19
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCA/qONGA APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE
"ROCHESTER AVENUE P~ANCHO CUCAJAONC~A HIGH SCHOOL
MITIGATION PROGPJU~ - FOR THE LANDSCAPING OF ROCHESTER
AVENUE EASTSIDE PARKWAY, FROM VICTORIA PARK LANE TO
HIGHLAND AVENUE", IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND
DIRECTING THE CIl~~ CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS
V~HEREAS, it Is the Intention of the Ctty of Rencho Cucamonga to construct
certain improvements in the Ctty of Roncho Cucamonga.
WHEREAS, the C1 ty of Rancho Cucamonga has prepared pl arts and
specifications for the construction of certain improvements.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the plans and specifications
presented by the City of Rancho Cucamonga be and are hereby appreved as the
plans and specifications for "ROCHESTER AVENUE - RANCliO CUCAMONGA HIGH SCHOOL
MITIP~ATION PROGPJU~" for the Landscaping of Rochester Avenue eastside Parkway,
from Victoria Park Lane to Highland Avenue".
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby authorized and
directed to advertise as required by law for the receipt of sealed bids or
proposal s for doing the work specified in the aforesaid plans and
specifications, which said advertisement shall be substantially in the
following words and figures, to wit:
"NOTICE INVITING SEALED BIDS OR PROPOSALS"
Pursuant to a Resolution of the Council of the City of Rencho Cucamonga, San
Bernardtno County, California, directing this notice, NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN
that the said City of Rancho Cucamonga will receive at the Office of the City
Clerk in the offices of the City of Rencho Cucamonga, on or before the hour of
2:00 PM on TUESDAY, APRIL 26, 1994, sealed bids or proposals for the
"ROCHESTER AVENUE - RANCliO CUCAMONGA HIGH SCHOOL MITIGATION PROGRAM" in said
City.
Bids will be publicly opened and read in the office of the City Clerk, 10500
Civic Center O~tve, Rencho Cucamonga, Californta .q1730.
Bids must be ~ on a form provided for the purpose, addressed to the City of
Rencho Cucamonga, California, marked, "Bid for Construction of ROCHESTER
AVENUE - RANCliO CUCAMONC~A HIGH SCHOOL MITIGATION PROGRNM."
PREVAILING WAGE: Notice is hereby given that in accordance with the
provisions of California Labor Code, Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Articles 1
and 2, the Contractor is required to pay not less than the general prevail tng
rate of per diem wages for work of a similar character in the locality in
which the public work is performed, and not less than the general prevailing
rate of per diem wages for holiday and overtime work. In that regard, the
Director of the Department of Industrial Relations of the State of California
is required to and has detemined such general prevailing rates of per diem
wages. Coptes of such prevafl fng rates of per dtem wages are on ftle fn the
offfce of the Ctty Clerk of the Cfty of Rancho Cucamonga, lOS00 C1vtc Center
13rtve, Rancho Cucamonga, California, and are available ~o any Interested party
on request. The Contractfng Agency al so shall cause a copy of such
determfnat/ons to be posted at the Job stte.
Pursuant to provlsfons of Labor Code Sectfon Z775, the Contractor shall
forfett, as penalty to the CIty of Rancho Cucamonga, not more than flfty
dollars ($50.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanlc employed for each
calendar day or portton thereof, ff such laborer, workman or machanfc Is paid
less than the general prevafllng rate of wages hePetnbefore stlpulated for any
work done under the attached contract, by him or by any subcontractor under
hlm, In violation of the provfslons of satd Labor Code.
Attention ts dtrected to the provtsfons fn Secttons 1777.5 and 1777.6 of the
Labor Code concerning the employment of apprentices by the Contractor or any
subcontractor under htm.
Sectfon 1777.S, as amended, requfres the Contractor or subcontractor employing
tradesman fn any apprenttcable occupation to apply to the .~olnt
apprenticeship co~,lttee nearest the stte of the publlc works project and
whfch admtnfsters the apprenttceshfp program fn that trade for a certfffcate
of approval. The certificate wtll also ffx the ratto of apprentlces to
:lourneymen that w111 be used In the performance of the contract. The ratlo of
apprentices to Journeymen tn such cases shall not be less than one to ftve
except:
A. When unemployment In the area of coverage by the ;lolnt apprenticeship
mlttee has exceeded an average of 15 percent tn the 90 days prtor to the
request of certificate, or
B. When the number of apprentices tn tratntng tn the area exceeds a ratio of
one to ~:tve, or
C. When the trade can show that tt Is replacing at least 1/30 of tts
membership through apprenticeship tratntng on an annual basis statewide or
locally, or
O. When the Contractor provtdes evtdence that he employs registered
apprentices on all of hts contracts on an annual average of not less than
one apprentice to etght Journeymen.
The Contractor ts roqutred to make contributions to funds established for the
administration of apprenttceshlp programs If he employs registered apprentices
or Journeymen tn any apprenttcable trade on such contracts and If other
Contractors on the publlc works site are maktng such contrlbutlons.
The Contractor and subcontractor under htm shall comply wlth the roqutroments
of Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 tn the rap1 oyment of apprentices.
Informatlon relattve to apprenticeship standards, wage schedules, and other
requirements may be obtatned from the Otrector of Zndustrtal relations,
ex-offtcto the A~tntstrator of Apprenticeship, San Francisco, Callfornta, or
from the Dtvlston of apprenticeship Standards and tts branch offlces.
Eight (8) hours of labor shall constitute a legal day's work for all workmen
employed in the execution of this contract and the Contractor and any
subcontractor under him shall comply with and be governed by the laws of the
State of California having to do with working hours as set forth in Division
2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Article 3 of the Labor Code of the State of California
as amended.
The Contractor shall forfeit, as a penalty to the city of Rancho Cucamonga,
twenty-five dollars ($25.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed
in the execution of the contract, by him or any subcontractor under him, upon
any of the work hereinbefore mentioned, for each calendar day during which
said laborer, workman, or mechanic is required or permitted to labor more than
eight (8) hours in violation of said Labor Code.
Contractor agrees to pay travel and subsistence pay to each workman needed to
execute the work required by this contract as such travel and subsistence
payments are defined in the applicable collective bargaining agreement filed
in accordance with Labor Code Section 17773.8.
The bidder must submit with his proposal, cash, cashier's check, certified
check, or bidder's bond, payable to the City of Rancho Cucamonga for an amount
equal to at least ten percent (10% of the amount of said bid as a guarantee
that the bidder will enter into the proposed contract if the same is awarded
to him, and in event of failure to enter into such contract said cast/,
cashier's check, certified check, or bond shall become the property of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga.
If the City of Rancho Cucamonga awards the contract to the next lowest bidder,
the amount of the lowest bidder's security shall be applied by the City of
Rancho Cucamonga to the difference between the low bid and the second lowest
bid, and the surplus, if any shall he returned to the lowest bidder.
The amount of the bond to be given to secure a faithful performance of the
contract for said work shall be one hundred percent (100%) of the contract
price thereof, and an additional bond in an amount equal to one hundred
percent (100%) of the contract price for said work shall be given to secure
the payment of claims for any materials or supplies furnished for the
performance of the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, or any work
or labor of any kind done thereon, and the Contractor will also be required to
furnish a certificate that he carries compensation insurance covering his
employees upo~ work to be done under contract which may be entered into
between him and the said City of Rancho Cucamonga for the construction of said
work.
No proposal will be considered from a Contractor to whom a proposal form has
not been issued by the City of ~ancho Cucamonga.
Contractor shall possess any and all contractors licenses, in form and class
as required by any and all applicable laws with respect to any and all of the
work to be performed under this contract; including but not limited to a Class
"A" License (General Engineering Contractor) or Class "C27" in accordance with
the provisions of the Contractor's License Law (California Business and Pro-
lesstons Code, Section 7000 eL. seq.) and rules and regulation adopte~
pursuant thereto.
The Contractor, pursuant to the "Cal lfornfa Bustness and Professfons Code",
Section 7028.15, shall tndlcate hts or her State Ltcense Number on the btd,
together wtth the expfratton date, and be stgned by the Contractor declaring,
under penal t;y of perjury, that the tnformatfon befng provfded fs true and
correct.
The ~ork fs to be done fn accordance wfth the p~oflles, plans, and
spec~ffcatfons of the Cfty of ~ancho Cucamonga on f~le fn the Office of the
Cfty Clerk at I0500 CIvic Center Dr~ve, Rancho Cucamonga, Cal ffornfa. Copies
of the plans and specfffcat~ons, available at the of~Ice of the C~ty Engfneer,
will be furnished upon appl fcat~on to the City of Rancho Cucamonga and payment
of $35.00 (THIRTY FIYE}, sa~d $3g.00 (THIRTY FIVE) ~s nonrefundable.
Upon ~rltten request by the bidder, coples of the plans and speclflcatfons
w~ll be mailed when sa~d request ~s accompanfed by payment stipulated above,
together wfth an addltfonal nonreimbursable payment of $15.00 (FIFTEEN
00LLARS) to cover the cost of mat~ fng charges and overhead.
The successful bfdder wfl3 be requtred to enter into a contract satfsfectory
to the Ctty of Rancho Cucamonga.
In accordance w~th the requirements of Sectf on 9-3.2 of the Gener$1
Provhfons, as set forth fn the F1ans and Specfffcatfons regardfng the
contracted to be done by the Contractor, the Contractor may, upon the
Contrector's request and at the Contractor's sole cost and expense, substftute
authorized securfttes In 1 feu of monfes wfthheld (performance retention).
The Cfty of Rancho Cucamonga, Cal ffornta, reserves the rfght to reject any or
all btds.
By order of the Council of the Cft~ of Rancho Cucamonga, Ca1 lforn~a.
Oated thfs 6TH day of APRIL lgg4.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Counctl of the Cfty of Rancho Cucamonga,
Ca1 ifornfa, this 6th day of Aprfl 1994.
~yor
ATTEST:
Clty C~er~
ADVERTISE ON: APRZL 12 and APRZL 19, 1994
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: Aprtl 6, 1994
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: '~ill tam J. O'Netl, City Engineer
BY: Betty A. Miller, Associate Engineer
SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION TO MODIFY A CONDITION OF APPROVAL FOR
TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 12877 - GOLDEN - A Resolution confirming a
City Council decision made on ~warch 16, 1994, for an appeal of a
Planning Cowmisslon decision to deny a modification to a condition
of approval to underground the existing overhead utilities beyond
the 1 tmtts of the project site for a subdivision of 3.28 acres of
land into 2 parcels in the Very Low Residential Qistrict (less than
2 dwelling units per acre), located on the north side of Hillside
Read east of Moonstone Avenue - APN 1061-251-24
RECIIIIE!e)ATIOIi:
It is recoewnended that the City Council adopt the attached Resolution.
BACI(GROUIID:
On March 16, 1994, the City Council heard the appeal of Tentative Parcel Map
Number 12877 to modify a condition of approval requiring the undergrounding of
existing overhead utilities beyond the limits of the project site. The
attached Resolution reflects City Council's decision to approve the appeal.
Respectfully submitted,
William J. O'lletl
City Engineer
WjO:BAM:dlw
Attachments
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAJMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A REQUEST TO MODIFY A
CONDITION OF APPROVAL FOR TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 12877, TO
UNDERGROUND THE EXISTING OVERHEAD UTILITIES ONLY WITHIN
THE LIMITS OF THE PROJECT SITE, LOCATEO ON THE NORTH SIDE
OF HILLSIDE ROAD, EAST OF MOONSTONE AVENUE WITHIN THE
VERY LOW (LESS THAN 2 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE)
RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT
THEREOF - APN 1061-251-24
Recltal s.
{t) An application has been submitted to the Ctty of Rancho
Cucamonga by Dr. Irwin B. Golden (hereinafter "applicant") for a subdivision
of 3.28 acres of land into 2 parcels on the north side of Htllstde Road, east
of Noonstone Avenue, heretnafter referred to as "the appltcatton."
(tt) On December 9, 1992, the Plannlng Coemlsslon condltlonally
approve Tentative Parcel Nap Z2877 wtth Resolution 92-145.
(Iit) On January 3, 1994, the applicant requested a eodtflcatton to
the condition of approval whtch requires undergrounding of existing overhead
utll ltles beyond the 1 iraIts of the project site.
(iv) On February 9, 1994, the Planning Coem~tssion heard the
modification request and concluded said hearing on that date with a Resolution
of Denial No. 94-06.
(v) The Planning Coe, etssion's action was ttmely appealed to this
Council on February 16, 1994.
(vt) On Hatch 16, 1994, the City Counctl of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga conducted a duly notice publtc hea-ing on the appeal and, on satd
date, concluded the publlc hearlng.
(vltl) All legal prerequlsltes to the adoptton of this Resolution
have occurred.
8. Rosol utton.
NOW, THERE:FOIE, it ts hereby found, aleretained, and resolved by the
City Counctl of the Ctty of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. The Council hereby specifically finds that all the facts set forth in
the Recttels, Part "A", of thh Resolution are true and correct.
2. Based upon substantial evtdence presented to thts Counctl durtng the
above-referenced meeting on raarch 16, 1994, Including wrttten and oral staff
reports, this Counctl hereby specifically flnds as follows:
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO.
TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 12877 - GOLDEN
Aprtl 6, 1994
Page 2
(a) The appltcatfon applfes to property located on the north stde
of H111s~de Road east of Moonstone Avenue and contafns the appl fcant's home;
and
(b) The property to the north of the subject sfte Is vacant, the
property to the south, east, and west of the slte conststs of s~ngle faintly
residential; and
(c) The tentatfve parcel map contemplates the subdfvtslon of the
subject stte tnto two (2) slngle family parcels, whtch fs permitted wlthtn the
Very Low Residential Development DIstrict.
(d) Resolution No. 87-96 of the Planning Commlssfon, which
establishes pollcy for the undergroundtrig of extstfng overhead utilities,
gives the Plannlng Commfsston authority to specifically watve a development
from the requlroments of satd Resolution.
{e) Thfs specific situation was. not contemplated upon
establ l shment of Plannlng Con~tsston Resolutlon Mo. 87-96.
3. Based upon the substantfal evidence presented to thts Council duHng
the above-referenced meetfng and upon the spectftc ftndlngs of facts set forth
tn paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Council hereby finds and concludes as
fol 1 ows:
(a) The requirement to underground uttllttes beyond the project
boundaMes, as out~ 1ned fn P1 anntng Coe~tsslon Rasp1 utfon 92-145, Is
Impractical for thts specific situation.
4. Based upon the ftndtngs and conclusions set forth fn paragraphs 1, 2,
and 3 above, thts Counctl hereby approves the appltcant's request to modtfy
Engineering 0tvtston condition Number 7 of Resolution 92-145 to read as
fol 1 ows:
"The exht~ng overhead utilities (tel eco~mun~cet~ons and
electrical) along the north property line of parcel 1
shall be undergrounded from the first pole east of
t4oonstone Avenue to the terminus about 135 feetea'~Tf, of
~oonstone Avenue pHor to approval of the Rnal Parcel
~4~p.=
5. Thts Council hereby provides notlce to Or. Zndn B. Golden that the
tfme wtthtn whtch Judfcfal revfew of the decision represented by thts
Resol utfon must be sought ts governed by the provisions of Cel lfornta Code of
Ctvtl Procedure Sectton 1094.6.
6. The Ctty Clerk Is hereby dtrected to: (a) certtfy to the adoptton of
thts Resolution, and (b) forthwlth transmtt a certified copy of thtS
Resolutlon by Certified I~tl, Return Recefpt Requested, to Dr. Irwtn B. Golden
at hfs address as per CIty records.
26 j
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ~
STAFF REPORT -
DATE: April 6, 1994
IU:. Mayor and Members of the City Council ~
Jack Lain, AICP, City Manager
FROM: Duane A, Baker, Assistant to the City Manager
SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION RELATING TO THE SALE OF BONDS
FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 88-2 (DiIORIO)
Recommendation:
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution. The
resolution will authorize the issuance of bonds, approve the forms of the Bond
Indenture, Bond Purchase Agreement and Preliminary Official Statement.
These actions are consistent with prior action of the City Council.
Background:
The attached resolution is consistent with a "Purchase/Financing Agreement",
specifically CO 89-111, in which the City and The Caryn Company have agreed
to certain conditions in order for essential drainage facilities to be
constructed. The Agreement is dated June 21, 1989. The Agreement calls for
the City to pay The Caryn Company, at prices to be determined by the City, for
certain facilities once they have been completed by The Caryn Company. The
total amount to be paid to The Caryn Company is limited to $3,510,000.
These facilities are now essentially complete and it is time to move forward to
acquire these facilities. The actions being requested are the first step in
issuing the bonds referenced in the Agreement with The Caryn Company. By
issuing the bonds and paying the developer, the purpose for which the district
was formed will be achieved. Because the attached resolution is associated with
prior actions of the City Council, adoption of the resolution is being
recommended.
Respectfully Submitted,
Duane A. Baker
Assistant to the City Manager
DAB/dab
A I~{{:SC{.i.ffIC!i ~ ~ CITY ~'rr. ~ ~ C~ ~ ~
COffr~ ~ P~LI~Y OfflC~ ST~'~ r~ A
H~, the CI~ CO~IL of ~ C~ ~ ~ ~,
~I~, is condu~ ~ for ~ ~i~ of ~
~lic ~{ ~ a ~,,,~ f~iliti~ d{~i~ ~t ~ ~
~ ~ p~i~ of ~ "~11~ ~md~ F~{]{~ ~ of 1982",
~ ~ 2.5, P~ 1, Div~i~ 2, Tl~e 5 of ~ ~x~',t ~ of
~ S~ of c~]ifo~ (~ "~"), ~d ~e,~ F~i~ D~i~
~i~tM ~ {~'~ F~u.~'re~ ~. 88-2 (~~ Nf~ ~ ~
~luti~ of ~i~ ~ ~ ~ ~ fM ~ L~,e,~, ~d
fo~h all fo~l teM ~ ~t~ ~ ~ ~ ~~,
~M ~ ~~ of ~d ~; ~,
{, ~eN hM ~ ~M, ~i~ ~ { for
appeal a ~nd iMent~ sett~g f~ fo~] ~ ~ ~~
~lat~ ~ ~ M ~ ~e of ~; ~,
1~~ ~ a f~ of ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~e of
{, ~ ~ ~ ~ ~e~ a f~ of ~ ~1~
D~ ~ ~ ~ of ~, ~1~ ~ ~ ~ ~f.
SE~ION 2x T~t tMs 1Wislati~ ~ ~ ~ri~ ~
~e of ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~1~ of ~ ~.
a~proved by the City Manager. Final approval of the Bond I~rbnture shall
be conclusively evidenced by the signature of t3~ City Maimget. A co~y of
said Bond IDa-nture shall be k~pt on file with the transcript of these
p~oceed/ngs and open for public insp~u~ion.
SEC~'~C~ 4~ That the Bcrd Purchase Contract su~nitted by Stone &
Youngberg, the a~ignated u~=~riter, is hereby appr~md substantially in
the fo~n ~ese~t~ herein, and is subject to modifications as ~ecessary
and as a~proved by the City Manager, with the final pricing of bo.ds being
delegated to the City Manager. Final ac~-F~aure of the Bond Purchase
Contract shall be evidenced by the signature of the City Maxlager on behalf
of the City.
Pm~.DqNa~l O~'~ICIAL S~RTE~NT
SECTIC~ 5: That the Pleli~hialy 0ffic{a] Sta~M~MltiS ~
subetan~] ly in the fozm preser~ced, subject to ~s3dificatiels as neceesal7
PlBliz~LPary Offic{a] StaM azld the cof~dir~ filial Offic~-I Sta~e-
e~-ute and deli%~.ry any certificate regarding the finality of the Prelimi-
nary Offic{a] Sta~t as mey be necessary or a~opriate for puxpoees of
c~,~lyixK/with Sectio~ 240.15C2-12 in Chapter II of Title 17 of the Code
of F~r~al R~latio~s ("Mule 15C2-12"). A o0[y of the Prelimilmry Offi-
cial Stata.~ ard final Official Sta~-lt shall be k~Ft c~ file with the
transcript of these ~/ings and ~-.-~. o~en for public l. smcticn.
SECTIC8 6~ All actirms l~--~ofo~e ta~m by the officers and
agents of the City with respect to the sale and issuance of the b~ds are
all other officers of the City aze hereby authorized and 4/zected, for and
any mid all actior~ relatirE/to the emecutio~ ard delivery of any and all
issuance a~ deli~_~y of the bonds in accordance with this resolution.
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: April 6, 1994
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Robert C. Dominguez, Administrative Services Director
BY: Joan Kruse, Purchasing Agent
SUBJECT: APPROVAL TO PURCHASE TELEPHONE AND VOICE MAIL SYSTEM
FOR CITY YARD NOT TO EXCEED $20,000 THROUGH TRANSFER
FROM (01-4647-3900) TO (01-4647-7044)
RECOMMENDATION
That City Council approval be given to purchase a telephone and voice mail
system for the City Yard at a cost not to exceed $20,000, including
installation. Funding for the purchase will be through a transfer of $20,000
from the Public Works MAintenance Section Maintenance and Operations account
(01-4647-3900) to the Public Works Capital Equipment Account (01-4647-7044).
BACKGROUND
Increasingly, the City Yard telephone system has had equipment failures due to
aging equipment. Additionally, the number of calls processed at the City Yard
has increased 50 percent over the past two years to the point that the demand
of incoming and outgoing calls, along with reduced staffing, compounds the
problem. This results in frustrating situations for both City staff and the
public.
As Council is aware, when we moved into City Hall, a new system, including
voice mail, was purchased. The City Yard acquired the old City Hall system,
which has been out of production for approximately eight years. Parts are
becoming scarce and third party maintenance has not been satisfactory.
Currently, only this facility and the neighborhood centers are without the
technological support of voice mail.
City staff has researched the problem and determined that the most economical
solution would be ths purchase of a reconditioned system, including voice
mail, to assist in properly directing incoming calls. With the research and
experience of telephone procurement for the Sports Complex and Animal Care
Shelter, the City has determined that now is the time to further standardize.
Mayor and Members of the City Council
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
Approval to Purchase Telephone and Voice Mail
System for City Yard
April 6, 1994
Page 2
The same system purchased for the Sports Complex and Animal Care Shelter can
be procured with the same warranty as a new system for approximately $20,000,
a savings of over 50 percent over a new system. It would be connected by tie
lines to City Hall in the same manner as the old system.
At this time, an analysis of the maintenance section fund balance indicates
adequate funds to transfer monies to the capital equipment fund for this
purchase.
Administrative Services Director
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: April 6, 1994
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Rick Gomez, Community Development Director
BY: Tarry L. Smith, Community and Park Development Superintendent
SUBJECT: DOWNEY EASEMENT AGREEMENT
RECQMMENDAT1QN
Staff is asking for approval to enter into and execute an agreement with Charles Bradford
Downey for a construction, grading, storm drain and street dedication easement for the
Sports Complex expanded parking lot project.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
This easement will allow the City to continue the storm drain south of the City owned
property and make the connection into the Day Creek Channel as well as make
improvements to the signals at the intersections of Stadium Way and Jack Benny Drive.
Roche?ter Avenue will be widened to City standard south to Jack Benny Drive.
Resp ctfuJ, ly su
~ ~'LS:' nt Director
Js
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: Apt11 6, 1994
TO: Nayor and HenVaers of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Nanager
FRON: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
BY Joe Stofa Jr., Associate Engineer
SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF PROFESSIONAL SERVICES N~REEMENT WITH
NORRIS-REPKE, INC., FOR THE DESIGN, SPECIFICATIONS
AJID COST ESTIMATE FOR THE IMPROVE)ENTS OF CARNELIAN
SLEET FROM SAN BERNARDINO RON) TO BASE LINE ROAD.
THE COST OF THE SERVICE IS $88,000 ($80,000 PLUS 10%
CONTINGENCY) AND WILL BE F1JNDED FROM F1JND 32 -
lqEASURE "I', ACCOUNT NO. 32-4637-9314
RECOIIqEMDATIOM
It is recomnended that the City Council approve the Professional
Services Agreement with Norris-Repke, Inc., and authorize the
Nayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement.
B/~CKGi~UI~/N~LYSI$
Carnelian Street was constructed prior to the incorporation of the
City. Over the years, the City has made various improvements with
advance warning signals, signing and striping within the existing
right-of-way limits. However, with the increased traffic and the
existing topography, staff feels that one of the curves in the
existing street requires realignment. Also, additional
right-of-way, will be required.
Norrts-Repke, Xnc. recently co~q~leted the design of the Raster
Plan Storm Drain and rehabilitation of the existing roadway of
Carnelian Street south of Base Line Road. With the knowledge
gained from this design, staff requested Norris-Repke, Inc. to
submit a proposal for the realignment of an existing curve in
Carnelian Street based on two different alternatives. After much
discussion, an agreement was reached* between staff and the
prospective consultant for the sum of $80,000 for the realignment,
i ncl udi ng but not 1 t mt ted to, desi gn, speci ft cati ons ~ cost
estimates, preparation of right-of-way documents, utility
coordination, property owner meetings and also being of assistance
through the bidding and construction phases.
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
NORRIS-REPKE, INC. PSA
Aprtl 6, 1994
Page 2
The proposed contract fee of $88,000 is to be funded from Fund 32
- f4easure "I". Copies of the agreement are available in the City
Clerk's office. This proposed project ts Included in this years
Capital Improvement Program.
City Engineer
WJO:JS:sd
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: April 6, 1994
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Coun il
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
"°" :Z'; :;;. 'Z;;2 ;'
Suz , . .
BY: Pau a , n
SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF AMENDED LIBRARY SERVICE ENHANCEMENT
CONTRACT (CO-92-016) WITH SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY
LIBRARY FOR FISCAL YEAR 1993/1994 IN THE AMOUNT
OF $25,000 FROM ACCOUNT NUMBER 01-4532-6028-4200
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that City Council approve the attached
amended Library Service Enhancement Contract (CO-92-016) with
San Bernardino County Library for fiscal year 1993/1994 in
the amount of $25,000 from account #01-4532-6028-4200.
BACKGROUND
As City Council is aware, since 1988 the City of Rancho
cucamonga and the county of San Bernardino has entered into a
Library Service Enhancement Contract. This contract
provides, from the City, $25,000 per fiscal year for
additional library services/materials at the Rancho Cucamonga
Branch Library located at 9191 Base Line Road. These funds
have been used in the past for additional operating hours at
the Branch on Sundays .and for the purchase of additional
library materials for our Branch Library.
Approving the attached amended contract will extend the term
of the existing contract to include fiscal year 1993/1994.
Extending the term will continue to provide our residents
with expanded hours of operation and an enhanced book
collection at the Rancho Cucamonga Branch Library until such
time as library services are provided by the County through a
transition agreement in preparation for the City's opening of
the Rancho Cucamonga Public Library.
SO:PP:th
FOR COUNTY USE ONLY
iA:,
County of San Bernardino ~ET~;~T~ '5 g~,~t;aF 7 4~T'. ~bTheT~G,ce Actl~;ty GRC PROJ. JOB Numcer
;
Co~dity CoO~' Eslima=ed Payment
STANDARD CONTRACT i F.' A~c,~ : c ;Y -~ount ' o
THIS CONTRACT is entered ;nto m the State of California by and between the County af San aernara~nc ~ere;naf:er ,:aired
C~ O~ ~C~O CmtCA~ON~A here:nafter called
IT IS HEREBY AGREED AS FOLLO~VS:
The parties hereby agree that contract No. 92-304 is amended as follows:
Page 2, Section II, paragraph A is restated to read as follows:
A. In consideration of the enhancement of services and resources
which County agrees to deliver at the Rancho Cueamonga Branch
specified in paragraph B hereof, City agrees to reimburse County for
County's annual actual costs of electrical, gas, water and telephone
('utility cost' hereinafter) incurred at the Rancho Cucamonga Branch
during fiscal year 1991/1992 through fiscal year 199311994, (July 1, 1991
through and including June 30, 1994), to a maximum of $25,000 per f'tscal
year. In that regard, County shall supply to City an accounting of all
such utility costs incurred by County at the Rancho Cucamonga Branch
as soon as is practicable following June 30th of each fiscal year. City
shall provide the above-referenced reimbursement thereof, up to a
maximum of $25,000 per fiseal year, within thirty (30) days of City's
receipt of said accounting.
Page 2, Section II, paragraph B (a) is restated to read as follows:
a. Maintain the Rancho Cucamonga Branch open through June
30, 1994, during all hours it now is normally open (including
but not limited to 4 operating hours on Sundays).
Except as herein modified, aH other provisions of contract
304 shall remain in full force and effect.
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
Chairman. Board of Sul:Nlrvi,sors (State if corporation, company, etc.)
Dated By e-
rAuthortze~ Signarurel
SIGNED AND CERTIFIED THAT A COPY OF THIS Dated
DOCUMENT HAS BEEN DELIVERED TO THE CHAIRMAN
OF THE BOARD. Title.
Clerk of the Board of Supervisors of the County of San
BernardinD. Address
By
Deputy
AoDrovecl as to Le al FO~ Reviewe(s as to Affirmative Action Revieweci for Processing
County Counse Agency AdministratorlCAO
Date 2-'ll~lm~f~g Date Date
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA '! ~--
STAFF REPORT
DATE: Aprtl 6, 1994
TO: .Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: Will Jam J. O'Neil, City Engineer
BY John Martin, Associate Engineer
SUBJECT: APPROVAL AND EXECUTION OF CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER NO.1 FOR THE
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH L.D. KING, INCORPORATED,
C.O. g3-060, RANCHO CUCAMONGA METROLINK STATION AT MILLIKEN
AVENUE AND THE METROLIk~( RAILWAY, ACCOUNT NUMBERS 36-4637-9326
AND 37-4637-9326 FOR $57,577.00 ($28,788.50 FROM EACH ACCOUNT)
RECIIMEIII)ATIOI
Approval and execution of Change Order NO. 1 for the Professional Services
Agreement with L.D. King, Incorporated, for design changes. Said change will
increase the consulting firm's contract $57,577.00 to $251,377.00, funded by
Account Numbers 36-4637-9326 and 37-4637-9326.
BACXGROUND/AJIALYSIS
On September 1, 1993, L.D. King, Incorporated, was engaged by the City to
prepare and submit plans, specifications and estimates for the above stated
project. Since that time the Consultant has submitted these items to the City
for review and comment.
While the Metrol ink Station was under the design process, the City, Metrol ink,
Metropolttan Water District and several other agencies required various design
changes that complicated and expanded the scope of this project. Design
changes include, but are not limited to, the addition of a north train
platform, an additional street into the project site, NO requirements over
their easements, the addition of a storm drain system, the addition of a sewer
system, and additional team meetings with other agencies and City staff.
Respectfully submitted,
Will faro J. O'Neil
City Engineer
WJO:jM:sd
CITY OF R`AdtCHO CUC,~dVIONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: April 6, 1994
TO: Mayor and hietubers of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: Will tam J. O'Neil, City Engineer
BY John Martin, Associate Engineer
SUBJECT: APPROVAL AND EXECUTION OF CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER NO.1 FOR THE
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEbiENT WITH RJM DESIGN GRDUP, INC.
C.O. 93-061, RANCHO CUCAJ4ONGA HETROLIN)( STATION AT MILLIKEN
AVENUE AND THE METRDLINK RAILWAY, ACCOUNT NUMBERS 36-4637-9326
AND 37-4637-9326 FOR $28,473.00 ($14,236.50 FROM EACH ACCOUNT)
RECOMMENDATION
Approval and execution of Change Order No. 1 for the Professional Services
Agreement with ~JM Design Group, Inc., for design changes. Said change will
increase the consulting firm's contract $28,473.00 to $66,473.00, funded by
Account Numbers 36-4637-9326 and 37-4637-9326.
6ACI(GROUMD/AJIALYSIS
On September 1, 1993, RJM Design Group, Inc., was engaged by the City to
prepare and submit to the City architectural plans, speci~tcations and
estimates for the above stated project. Since that time the Consultant has
submitted these items to the City for review and comment.
While the Rancho Cucamonga Metrol tnk Station was under the design process, the
City, Hetrolink and other agencies required various design changes that
complicated and expanded the scope of this project. Design changes include,
but are not limited to, a drip irrigation system, revised bardscape design,
development of various al ternate character schemes for the station,
preparation of colored exhibits, revised bus tornaround, and additional team
meetings with other agencies and City staff.
Respectfully submitted,
Will tam J.
City Engineer
WJ0:jM:sd
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA .
STAFF REPORT
DATE: April 5, 1994 .~:~
TO: Y4ayor and faembers of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Hanager
FROm4: Wil~ faro J. O'Neil, City Engineer
BY John P4artln, Associate Engineer
SUBJECT: APPROVAL AND EYECUTION OF CONTi~ACT CHANGE ORDER NO.1 FOR THE
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH WILLIA3450N & SCHNID, C.O.
94-004, ARROW ROUTE STOR94 DRAIN PORTION OF THE MILLIKEN AVENUE
EXTENSION FRO4 ARROW ROUTE TO FOOTHILL BOULEVARD PROJECT,
ACCOUNT NUMBER 32-4637-9328 FOR $2,500.00
~NI)ATION
Approval and execution of Change Order No. I for the Professional Services
Agreement with Willlamson & Schmtd for additional soil bortngs. Said change
will increase the consulting ftrm's contract $2,500.00 to $51,500.00, funded
by Account No. 32-4637-9328.
BAiXGROUIB)/ANALYSIS
On January 5, 1994, Will lainson & Schmld was engaged by the City to prepare and
submit to the City plans, specifications and estimates for the above stated
project. Since that time the Consultant has submitted hydrology calculations,
hydraulic calculations, plans and cost estimates to the City for review and
COnIneRt.
Though not part of the Arrow Route Storm Drain design, the additional soil
bortngs requested in Change Order No. 1 are needed to establish the Mtlliken
Avenue street design and construction parameters.
Respectfully submitted,
Will tam J. l~
City Engtnee~
WJO:jN:sd
CITY OF RANCH0 CUCAMONGA .
STAFF REPORT
DATE: April 6, 1994
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Rick Gomez, Community Development Director
BY: Tarry L. Smith, Community and Park Development Superintendent
SUBJECT: FILING OF NOTICE OF COMPLETION AND PARTIAL RELEASE OF
RETENTION FOR THE SPORTS COMPLEX CONSTRUCTION
PROJECT
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council approve filing of the Notice of Completion and
partial release of retention and applicable bonds for the Sports Complex construction project
at 8404 Rochester Avenue·
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
Staff has deemed the Sports Complex to be complete, with only a few minor items
remaining. Staff, with the cooperation of the City Attorney, agree that a partial release of
retention funds and applicable bonds would be appropriate at this time. A separate
agreement with Bernards Brothers has been signed obligating them to finish these few
remaining items before that money will be released. A minimum of $459,675 will be held
for thirty-five days after the filing of the Notice of Completion as required by contract and
Civil Code.
Resp ctfully s
t Director
· :dk
R SO ON NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CAI.IFORNIA AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF THE NOTICE OF
COMPI-ETION, REI-EASE OF APPLICABLE BONDS AND PARTIAL
RELEASE OF RETENTION FOR THE SPORTS COMPI .EX
CONSTRUCTION PROJECT
WHEREAS, the construction of the Sports Complex has been completed to the
satisfaction of the Community and Park Development Department; and
WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed certifying the work
complete.
NOW THEREFORE, be it resolved that the work is hereby accepted and the
Community and Park Development Director is authorized to sign and file a Notice of
Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County.
CITY OF RANCH0 CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: April 6, 1994 !~:.
TO: Mayor, and Meffbers of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FRON: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
BY: Steve H. Gilliland, Public Works Inspect~
SUBJECT: RELEASE OF htAINTENANCE GUARANTEE BOND FOR TRACT 14192-1
lANDSCAPE AND STORH DRAIN, LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF
HELLHJ~I AVENUE SOUTH OF 19TH STREET
RECClIENDATION
It is recomended that the City Council authorize the City Clerk to
release the Maintenance Guarantee Bond.
BACKGIU)UII)/NIALYSIS
The required one year maintenance period has ended and the street
i~rovements remain free from defects in material s and workmanship.
DEVELOPER: Hlx Development 437 S. Cataract Avenue, Suite 3
San Dimas, CA 91773
Release: Landscape Storm Drain
Maintenance Guarantee Bond $42,700 $6,g00
Respectfully submitted,
William J. 0i1~~J
City Engtnee~
WJO:SNG:sd
CITY OF RANCH0 CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: April 6, 1994
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lain, AICP, City Manager
FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner
BY: Beverly Luttrell, ASsociate Planner
SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMEMT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 93-02B - MASI
PARTNERS - A request to add Recreational Comercial as a land use
designation in the General Plan and to amend the land use
designation from Industrial Park to Recreational Commercial for 27
acres of land located at the southwest corner of Foothill BOulevard
and Rochester Avenue - APN: 229-011-10, 19, 21, and 26 through
28. Planning Comission recommends issuance of a Negative
Declaration. Related File: Conditional Use Permit 91-24.
ENVIRONMF-.~TAL ASSESSMENT AND INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN
AMENDMENT 94-02 - MASI PARTNERS - A request to modif7 Subare 7 to
allow limited commercial on 27 acres of land located at the
southwest comer of Foothill BOulevard and Rochester Avenue, APN:
229-011-10, 19, 21 and 26 through 28; and modify the definition of
Automotive Service Courts. Planning Commission recommends issuance
of a Negative Declaration.
City Council continued this item from their March 16, 1994 meeting at the request
of the applicant. The applicant ' s letter requesting the continuance and the
March 16, 1994 staff report are attached.
Respectfully submitted,
City Planner
BB:BL:Sp
Attachments
MANNERINO
BRiGuGLIO
JOHN D. MANNERINO
SAL BRIGUGLIO ~ "RECEIVED __
C TY OF RA?~CHO CUCAMONGA
M~TCHELL ~OTH f~LANi'~ING DIVISION
WA FACS~M~nS ~'~ ~TED ST~TSS ~ MAR I ? 1994
Mr. Brad Buller
Chief Planning Commissioner
City cf Rancho Cucaumonga
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, California 91729
Re: Masi Proiect
Dear Mr. Buller:
Pursuant to the request of the applicant with regard to the above-
referenced matter, we are requesting a continuance be granted and
the matter be set for hearing at the next City Council meeting on
April 6, 1994, not March 31, 1994 as previously stated in our
letter dated March 15, 1994.
The reason for the Continuance is to augment our presentation to
more fully develop our plans for the site.
Thank ~ou for your consideration.
Veryq
r ours,
9333 BASELINE ROAD, SUITE 110 / RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CA 91730 / TEL (909)980-1100 / FAX (909j9~,~ ~'
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ,- ~
STAFF REPORT
DATE: March 16, 1994 ~
TO: Mayor 'and Members of the City Council ii'~" "~
Jack Lain, AICP, City Manager
FROM: Brad Bullet, City Planner
BY: Beverly Luttrell, Associate Planner
SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 93-02B - MASI
PARTNERS - A request to add Recreational Commercial as a land use
designation in the General Plan and to amend the land use
designation from Industrial Park to Recreational Commercial for 27
acres of land located at the southwest corner of Foothill Boulevard
and Rochester Avenue - APN: 229-011-10, 19, 21, and 26 through
28. Planning ComMiSsion recommends issuance of a Negative
Declaration. Related File: Conditional Use Permit 9~-24.
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN
AMENDMENT 94-02 - MASI PARTNERS - A request to modify Subare 7 to
allow limited commercial on 27 acres of land located at the
southwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and Rochester Avenue, APN:
229-011-~0, 19, 21 and 26 through 28; and modify the definition of
Automotive Service Courts. Planning CommiSsion recomends issuance
of a Negative Declaration.
The Planning CoMtssion recommends approval of this application as modified at
the public hearing on February 23, J994.
General Plan Amendment No. 93-02B was first considered by the Planning Co~ esion
on Februaz7 9, 1994. HOWever, that hearing was continued and readvertised to
February 23, 1994, for the purpose of presenting an alternative land use
designation for the Co-~t ssion ' s consideration. The staff reports and minutes
for both meetings have been included for your review.
The General Plnn Amendment presented to the Planning Commission on February 23,
1994, proposed a new land use categnry of Recreational Commercial which would
apply to the entire 27-acre site. This category would also allOW up to 35
percent of the total gross leasable area of the project to be for general retail
comercial uses in addition to already permitted or conditionally permitted uses
of Subarea 7. The Co-w. tssion expressed concern reger~ing the ~-~nnt of
additional retail onmercial uses this would aaa to the City and after discussion
on the item, they modified the General Plan Amendment request by deleting
reference to "electronics, furniture, and appliances" retail uses.
CITY COUNCIL STAFF R~PORT
GPA 93-02B & ISPA 94-02 - MASI
March 16, 1994
Page 2
The proposed Industrial Area Specific Plan Amendment was to allow a limited
amount of general comercial in Subarea 7 of the ISP and to expand the definition
of "Automotive Service Court" to include "general automotive repair."
The Planning Comission approved a modified Industrial Area Specific Plan
amendment which deleted the reference to general comercial within Subarea 7 and
inserted language permitting recreation/sporting goods and apparel retail. This
modification was consistent with the Planning Co~nission~s action on the General
Plan Amendment.
The Planning Colission supported the addition of general automotive repair to
the definition of "Automotive Service Court" as submitted by the applicant.
Staff has found no significant impacts on the environment as a result of the
proposed General Plan Amendment and the Industrial Area Specific Plan
Amendment. The Planning Colission reco-~ends issuance of a Negative
Declaration.
FACT~ FOR F~DXF~8
The proposed amendments are consistent with the Industrial Area Specific Plan and
the General Plan. The amendments will no~ be detrimental to adjacent properties
or cause significant adverse environmental impacts.
This item has been advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily
Bulletin newspaper.
BB:BL/JfS
Attachments: ~xhibit "A~ - Staff Report ~ated February 23, ~994
Exhibit 'B' - Planning Comission Minutes dated
February 23, ~994
Exhibit "C~ -'Resolution No. 94-08
Exhibit "D~ - Resolution No. 94-09
Exhibit "E~ - Resolution NO. 94-10
Exhibit ~F" - Staff Report dated February 9, ~994
Exhibit "G~ - Planning Co-~ssion Minutes dated
February 9, ~ 994
Resolution of Approval for GPA 93-02B, Part A
Resolution of Approval for GPA 93-02B, Part B
Ordinance Approving ISPA 94-02
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA · '
STAFF REPORT
DATE: February 23, 1994
TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Comission
FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner
SUBJECT: ~qVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENEPJ~L PLAN AMENDMENT 93-02B -
MASI PARTNERS - A request to add Recreational Commercial as a
land use designation in the General Plan and ~o amend the
land use designation from Industrial Park to Recreational
Co~nercial for 27 acres of land located at the southwest
corner of Foothill Boulevard and ROchester Avenue
APN: 229-011-10, 19, 21, and 26 ~hrough 28. Staff
reckends issuance of a Negative Declaration. This matter
will be forwarded to the City Council for final action and
~he date of the public hearing before City Council will he
separately notices. Related File: Conditional Use Permit
91-24
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND INDUSTRIAL AR~A SPECIFIC PLAN
AMENDMENT 94-02 - MASI PARTNERS - A request to modify Subarea
7 to allow limited oo~nercial on 27 acres of lancl located at
~he southwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and Rochester
Avenue - AP~z 229-011-10, 19, 21, and 26 through 281 and
modify the definition of Automotive Service Court. Staff
reoommende issuance of a Negative Declaration. This will be
forwarded ~o the City Council for final action and the date
of the public bearing before Cit7 Council will be separately
no=iced.
BACKGROUND: This item was continued and N-advertised from the last
meeting for the purpose of presenting an alternative land use
desi~lation for the Planning Comsission's consideration. The staff
repoz~ of Pebruary 9, 1994 is attached for your reference.
ANALYSISs 8~aff can support retail on a limited basis as an alternative
to the reques~ for Geaeral Comercial. The ap~licant desires region-
serving and sub-region serving epeciality retail uses because of their
location along ~he Clty's primary co~ercial corridor and proximity to
the 1-15 Freeway. Staff believes that the area can suppor~ some
additional comercial land. The Rencho Cucamonga Adult Spor~ Park and
Rancho Cucamonga Stadium, which adjoin the subject site ~o ~ south,
creates a unique opportunit7 for recreational ~omroial ac~ivity.
PLANNING CO~ISSION STAFF REPORT
GPA 93-02 & ISPA 94-02 - MASI
February 23, 1994
Page 2
G~qERAL PLAN AMENDMENT: The General Plan currently has five connnercial
land use categories to meet the City ' s need for retail and services ·
These include: Neighborhood Connnercial, General CoE~ercial, C0munity
Comercial, Regional Con~nercial, and Office Professional. Staff
recommends that a new commercial land use category be created as
follows:
Recreation Commercial: Development of recreation facilities and
retail uses shall be encouraged along Foothill BOulevard surrounding
the Rancho Cucamonga Adult Sport Park near the intersection of
Rochester Avenue. The basebell stadium and year-round sports
activities in the Sports Park create a unique opportunity to provide
secondary region-serving .speciality retail uses that are not major
general merchandise department stores or food or drug stores. They
generally use approximately 3,500 - 55,000 square feet of gross
leasable area and require sites with high visibility and high
traffic counts. These centers typically have convenient freeway
access and draw their customers from within a five to ten mile
radius. Uses in this categery are regional in nature and not
nol~nally found in neighborhood oonmmercial centers. These types of
occupancies could include discount retailers, such as sporting
goods, apparel, electronics, furniture, and appliances.
INDUSTR/AL SPECIFIC PLAN: Subarea 7 of che Industrial Area Specific
Plan stretches along the south side of Foothill Boulevard from Day Creek
to Deer Creek, a distance of approximately ~wo miles. Although it is
designated 'Indumtrial Park' in the Industrial Area Specific Plan, land
use ac~ivities currently perntttted includs no~ only traditional light
manufacturing, but also a full range of office, administrative, business
suppor~c, and other business and personal related services, including
convenience retail, entertainment, and automotive services.
Staff recomends that the descriptic~ of the purpose of Subarea 7 be
modified to reflect the current City policies and development patterns,
as follows=
Prima~ Func~ciont Subarea 7 occupies an area directly south of
Foothill Boulevard which represents an 4.m.nortant land use edge
between the City's Industrial Area and a large master planned
co~mit7 tO the north. Foothill Boulevard is the City's primary
comercial corridor and serves as a gateway to the City. Along
Foothill Boulevard, the intersections at Haven, Millikan, and
Rochester Avenues have been designated as activity centers to
proroots concentrated activity and establish a unique design theme.
A major industrial and office development on approxJa~ately 300 acres
is currently undergeing phased cons~ruc~ion be~wean Haven and
Millikan Avanuee. Within this area is the Rancho CUcmmuga Civic
Center and San Bernardino County COUrthouse.
PLANNING COM4ISSION STAFF REPORT
GPA 93-02 & ISPA 94-02 - MASI
February 23, 1994
Page 3
Staff also recon~ends that language be added to reflect the proposed
Recreational Commercial land use designation for the Masi PlaZa project
site. The following language is similar to the approach us~ed in the
Industrial Area Specific Plan SubarM 7 regulations for t~e K Mart
center: I
Special Consideration: At the southwest corner ofI Foothill
Boulevard and Rochester Avenue, adjoining the Rancho Cucamonga Adult
Sports Park and Rancho Cucamonga Stadium, the DevelopmentI Code land
District shal a s PP y
use provisions for the General Commercial 1 . 1 o a 1
to the planned 27-acre mixed-use center, except that ~epartment
stores or food or drug stores shall not be allowed. These uses
shall be in addition to those uses allowed by the Industrial Park
shall not exceed 35
(Subarea 7). The amount of general commercial project.
percent of the total gross leasable area for the
In 1992, the City Council amended the Industrial Area Specific Plan to
add a new land use type, "Automotive Service COurt" to I encourage
automotive repair uses to congregate into planned centers wi~h
appropriate screening. Subsequently, an automotive servicel court was
approved and built on Archibald Avenue at 8th Street. Currently, major
automotive and truck repair, such as transmission and engine repair, and
body work, are prohibited. Staff believes that general ~ automotive
repair, such as transmission and engine repair, is appropriate and
compatible with other uses allowed within an automotive service court-
ol ~ : ( The
Therefore, staff recomaends modifying the definition as f owe
design criteria do not change. ) I
of
Automotive Service Court: An integrated cluster ~ related
automotive service activities, which typically include: gas
stations~ service stations, with or without ancillary uses such as
car washes and food marts~ general autueotive service 8and repair
including wn,~flers, shocks, alignments, brakes, oi~ changes,
lubrications, tune-ups, smog checks, tire repair and r~placement,
and transmissions~ installation of air conditioning, ~ar phones,
sterocs, windshields, and upholstery; windshield tinting; sale of
auto partee and o~her related services.
ENVII~38M~T~L ASSESSMENT: Staff has reviewed Part I of the Initial
ific
Study and completed Part II and has found no sign ~nt adverse
anviro~mental impacts that will occur as a result of t~e proposed
General Plan Amena~ant or Industrial Area Specific Plan Amendment-
CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a public: hearing in
~e ~ ~alle= Dall= Bulletin newspaper, the propert~ has been
posted, and notices were sent to all property owners within 300 feet of
the project site.
PLANNING COM4ISSION STAFF REPORT
GPA 93-02 & ISPA 94-82 - MASI
February 23, 1994
Page 4
RECO~4ENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission reckend
approval of General Plan Amendment 93-02B and Industrial Area Specific
Plan 94-02 through adoption of the attached Resolutions.
Respectfu submitre
City Planner
BB:DC:mlg
Attachments: Exhibit "A" - General Plan and Industrial Area Specific
Amendment Location Map
Exhibit "B" - Applicant's Justification Statemelt
Exhibit "C' - LAst of Uses - SubarM 7
Exhibit "D' - Retail Sales Figures
Exhibit "E' - Staff Report dated February 9, 1994
Resolution of Approval General Plan Amandmant 93-02B
Paxt A
Resolution of Approval General Plan ~m~dment 93-02B
Part B
Resolution of Approval Industrial Area Specific Plan
Amendment 94-02
C COMMERCIAL
HAVEN OVERLAY
DISTRICT
INDUSTRIAL PARK
GENERAL INDUSTP'a
MINIMUM IMPACT
HEAVYINDUSTRIAL
:"' """ I h.'. I LOW-MEDIUM 4 e~'m,,~: i:;:::.;) ~ · ,4
I MEDIUM-HI(~,H H ~4 IxJ~,c
COMMERCIAl/OFFICE
B C(XWI~fi(31AL
t. L:'! CiTY COMMERCIL
i lelN~ICdlI(31{It(XX) COIIA.
~ RE~ COMII]ICIRL
INDUSTRIAL
I::~:':~ GENIE~L NDUSIRIA~
U'///,dJ HEAVY INDUSTRIAL
Foothal
Projecl O~N
f~:l FLO01) CONlll0L:I
I N -- -,,-.., ~CIAL BOUI.EVAilD
I Arrow Hwy
4~ PUDLJC F'A~:ILITIES
/ II "'1 EXIST~ SCIt(KX_S
(.Y," I PriGPOSED SCltOOtS'
'lik~,~ PA~K,S'(t.s~m~,
{ · I CIVIC/CiTY
NO Scale ~...= ,row. k.,-. -, ,~,, w I..,. ,.,,,-,-. ,m.
Crrv OF UCAMONOA
To: Dan Coleman, Beverly Luttrell
Planning Division, City of Rancho Cucamonga
From: Jack Masi, Michael Scandiffio
Masi Commerce Center Partners
Date: November 22, 1993
Re: Masi Plaza - General Plan Amendments
Dear Mr. Coleman and Ms. Luttrell.'
We request that our application, dated November 9, 1993, requesting
an amendment to ~he Industrial Specific Plan be conver~ced into an
application for ~he following General Plan Amendments:
anclllar7 pet supply sales and pat grooming facilities
wi~h ancillar~ pat supply sales.
use proJec~cs ~hat have recreation and/or enter=ainment
coml~nents, restaurants and ether service or ionted
commercial uses and meet other specific criteria. Our
a specie1 mre~ail all~wancea categcr~ to
~ end the General Plan ~:o allow in Subarea 7 of the
~n~us~rial Specific so as
Plan the following additional
activities u~ier the ,automotive Service Cour~"
def init ion
- ~ransmiselon service and replacemen~
- general automobile repair
- car rentals
If you have any ques~:lone or need further infomtion, please call
Michael Scandiffio at (SlS) 846-2070.
S incere ly,
Masi Commerce Center Partners - Amendments to =he General Plan
November 22, 1993
Page 2
PIIOPOB~D AMJ~D~qeTB TO S~ 70P ~ Z~a8~ BP~IPZC
2) Specialty Retail:
Special~y retail s~ores s~cializ~ng in ~e sale of one
or lore of ~e following: housewares appliances
electronics, hone f~nish~ngs & accessories, plants
garden supplies, auto ~s & accessories, keys & l~ks,
sewing supplies, heal~ & Nauty sullies, apparel,
footwear & relat~ accessories, e~ds i gifts, variety
stores ~d o~er relet~ spcial~y retail ltm. ~xim~
size of any s~ngle user lim~t~ ~o 25,000 s~are fee~.
Establ~sh~ne ~o~t and ~cat~on of Pe~t~
~e total ao~t of ~e "reta~l allwanes~ ~a~
gant~ from ~e a~ve ~lse~ble re~l use
shall not exce~ ~e less~ of ei~ a) ~ ~o~t
loutions ~t ~ ~ble wi~ adieuant non-re~ail
uses. B~eve, ~ to 15% of all~le retail uses
~ ~itt~ ~n non~i~t~ l~tions if such
l~t~ons ue ~tible v~ adJee~t
dete~n~ ~ ~e City Pl~).
Auol~cation and ~o~ ~s~at~o~ for a~%z~aI Retail Alliance
1) Oll~tton~
~e ms~lal re~ll alliance- ~11 ~ ~t~ only as pan
o~ ~ a~ltueton ~or a co~ltlonal Use P~lt, or uended
Condltloul U~ 9~1t, for a ~st~ pl~ develo~nt.
~ ~ o~ ~ Condltto~l U~ ~lt, ~ ~1~1~ Cmlsston
~ve ~nttt~ retail ~e ut~orles, s~tfyl~ ~e total
oo~t of suO alliance ~t Is ~lsstble ~ ~e ~11dt~
Masi Co,.-,erce Center Partners - Amendments to the General Plan
November 2;2, 1993
~ROIz. OaBD AiI~NDItBIIT8 TO 8UB~itF~ ~ OF T~I ZIIDURTRZAL 8~!CXFXO
"8pecial Retail Allowance for M4wed-Use ~roJects with Recreation
and/or Entertainment Components, Restaurants and Other service
Oriented Commercial Uses."
The project must meet ~ha lollowing criteria:
1) Must be at least 20 acres in size;
2) Must be located along Foothill Boulevard and have a
frontage of at least 1,000
3 ) Must be located at the intersection of Foothill Boulevard
and a major az'cerial;
4) Must contain a designated wac~civity centere;
5) Must be in reasonable proximity to City-owned
recreational facilities or parks and have natural links
to such facilities;
6) Must have a significant level of building area
desi~nated ~or recreation and/or entertainment uses,
restaurants and other service oriented commercial uses;
7) Must not be par~ o~ a lar~er muster planned proJec~c that
is predominantly office,. professional or industrial in
character; and,
7) Must have on-site pedes~rian amen&ties, such as plazas
and landscaped walkways, and have an overall design
conducive to pedestrian use.
permitted Retail Use Catsaeries
The following retail use catqories muy be permitted for eligible
proJ acts:
l) hacreat40n & Entertainment Related Retail:
This category include8 the sale of sporting
spoL~csvear & acceseoriee, western wear, hobby supplies,
ax'cs, crafts, photo & music supplies i services, coins
~ & an ques,
i s~SapS, tOyS, pea & pet supplies,
spoz~cm collec~ibles i trophies, books & magazines and
video/record/~ape/CD rentals & sales. Maximum size
any single user limited to approx. 40,000 square
SUBAR~A 7
Land Use DesJgnatton [ndustrtal Park
Primary runctJon Subarea 7 occupies an area dtrectly south of I:ootht11
Boulevard ~htch represents an Important land use
between the Ct ty' s Z ndustrt al Area and cornBun1
oftented non-Industrial area and is i gatedy to the
CIty. A mjor industrial. office. and commercial
develolxment on approxtB~tely 300 acres is currently
undergoing phased construction. ~itthtn this area ts
planned Chtc Center whtch will tncl~le San 8efner~tno
County end City offices.
Pem~tted Uses Cust~8 IMnufKturtng
Ltght I~nufeCturtng
Ad~lnfstrettve end Offtel
Professto'nil/Design Servtces
Reseercl~ Servtces
Ltg~t It~lesale. Sterile. Otstrtl~t(on
8utldtng I~tntenance Servlces
Busf heSS $,pply Rlt411 Sales end $er~tcel
Busthess S,~l~rt $ervtcls
Cemuntcetf~ S4rvtcll
Earlrig end DHnktng EsU=11slmnts
FInancial. Znsurance end Real Estate Services
Hotel
Ad~lntstreth~ CIvtc Services
Fqond C~,tr~l/Uttllty
Condt tlonll Uses A, mtl ~e Reetal/~eesfng
Auramet1 ve Sales
Autmotlve $evtcl Startoe
Co~ve~!enc, Sales and $evlcls
Entetaf
Flit Food Sales
Pers~Ral $ervfcls
Ilecre,tte Facilities
Cul tMrll
PMI)11C Alllll)ly
FMMfC Safety end Uttltty Services
Itelffl~us kssemMy "
57
Business
Valley retail sales post 2.6% loss
I State report details 2nd-quarter drop ~~~1
~,"':.""-- ., ,, · .-~ ~' --~ '.~~.,,
~ lke ~m Mlmib3re,r'. Ca~11121113
~~~ ~0n~ 2~,.9 ~,~1 -2.2 .~7.~ 375.282 '~'8
Anlelee Cnnt~e ~
~~d~d'
~. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ -~ ~. ~ ~...,-
,.- : ~ Pacer's
~ ~ ~ earnings
. q~hl
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
Adjourned Meeting
February 23, 1994
Chairman Barker called the Adjourned Meeting of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
Planning Commission to order at' 5:00 p.m. The meeting was held in the Council
Chamber at Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho
Cucamonga, California. Chairman Barker then led in the pledge of allegiance.
ROLL CALL
COMMISSIONERS: PNESENT: David Barker, Heinz Lumpp, Larry McNiel,
Peter Tolstoy
ABSENT: John Melcher
STAFF PRESENT: Shintu Bose, Deputy City Engineer~ Brad Bullet, City
Planner~ Dan Coleman, Principal Planner~ Rick Gomez,
community Development Director~ Ralph Hanson, Deputy City
Attorney~ Dan James, Senior Civil Engineer~ Beverly
Luttrell, Associate Planner~ Diana O°Neal, Management
Analyst II~ Gail sanchez, Planning Commission Secretar3F
ANNOUNCEMENTS
There were no announcements.
A. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN/~MENDMENT 93-02B - MASI PARTNERS
- A request to add Recreational Con~nercial am a land use designation An
the General Plan and to amend the land use designation frmm Industrial
Park to Recreational ccx~aercial for 27 acres of land located at the
southwes~ corner of Foothill Boulevard and Rochester Avenue - APN: 229-
011-10, 19, 21, and 26 through 28. Related File: Conditional Use Permit
91-24.
B. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 94-02
~ - A request to modify Subarea 7 to allow limited
commercial on 27 acres of land located at the southwest corner of Foothill
Boulevard and Rochester Avenue, APN: 229-011-10, 19, 21, and 26 through
28~ and modify the definition of Automotive Service Court.
chairman Barker recessed the meeting from 5:04 p.m. to 5:11 p.m. to await the
arrival of the applicant.
Bred Bullet, City Planner, presented the steff report.
Co~missioner McNlel esked if there would be a reconfigura~ion of the proposed
auto cour~ because of the proposed additional uses in the auto court.
Commissioner Tolstoy asked if any additional square footage was being
requested for the auto court area.
Mr. Buller replied that staff had not been informed of any proposed site
changes or additional square footage requested.
chairman Barker opened the public hearing.
John Mannerins, Mannerins & Briguglio, 9333 Base Line Road, Suite 110, Rancho
Cucamonga, showed · layout of the entire project as it is currently
epproved. He believed the project should have been developed ee · General
Commercial project. He thought the area had changed since adoption of the
Generel Plan and any reasons which may have existed when the plan was adopted
were no longer valid. He felt the addition of 35 percent General Commercial
with the balance being considered Recreational Comnercial w~uld work. He
commented that the requirement for conditional use permits would afford
protection to the City. He said no configuration changes were proposed for
the service station. Re stated that Mr. Meal, Bill Claire, and Mike
Scandiffio were present in the audience to answer questions.
Couxnissioner McNlel questioned if the additional auto related uses might cause
· change in the configuration of buildings within the auto court because of
the necessity to orient roll up doors away from the street or main drivewey.
Mr. Mannerins said no such changes are anticipated at this time.
Commissioner Lumpp noted that the site plan appeared different from the plans
most recently presented to the Planning Commission, in that the larger
buildings along the southern end of the project had been broken up into
smaller buildings.
Mr. Bullet stated that the site plan presented this evening did not match the
latest application presented by the applicant.
Mr. Mannerins stated the site plan did metch the last approved plan and was as
the applic~nt intends to build the project.
Co~missioner Lumpp said there had been a workshop with only three buildings on
the south.
Dan Colman, Principal Planner, stated that workshop plan hed represented the
applicant's plane for a skating rink, which called for combining several of
the smaller buildings.
Cc~missioner Lumpp asked if the application for Conditional Use Permit 93-27
had been withdrawn.
P c Adjourned Meeting Minutes -2- Februax7 23, 1994
Mike Soandiffio. 1510 Riverside Drive, Burbank, stated they had broken up the
application into several pieces for =he benefit of the Planning Coa~nission.
He said when the application for the Spaghetti Factory was presented, they
showed combining several of the smaller buildings in the back of the parcel,
but the plan had not worked out because of parking requirements.
Commissioner Tolstoy noted that the application had been before the Co~nission
for a long time because of all of the changes which were requested.
Mr. Mannerins acknowledged that the project had taken a ~ong time. He felt
most of the delays and changes were because they had been trying to fit the
project onto an industrially zoned property. He said they had been trying to
zone by perspective tenant and that cannot be done. He said there is a
pending conditional use permit application which has not been withdrawn. He
observed that the plans for a skating rink had run into trouble because of
parking needs. He said discussions with staff regarding the parking are still
ongoing. He stated a number of people had expressed an interest in having a
skating/roller rink in the location, but it did not look like it will happen.
Co~missioner Lumpp noted that at the last meeting he had requested an exhibit
showing the entire area and where the proposed 35 percent General Co~aercial
would be located.
Mr. Mannerins pointed out which buildings were anticipated to be used for the
35 percent General Commercial uses.
Hearing no further testimony, Chairman Barker closed the public hearing.
co=~issioner Lumpp supported the addition of a Recreational co~nercial
designation. He felt the Sports Park is a catalyst for additional co~m~ercial
uses$ however, he thought electronics, furniture, and appliances are general
retail uses rather than recreational An nature. He requested the elimination
of such uses from the definition as well as the word 'discount.'
C~lssioner MeNial cmnted the project has been a long, hard struggle. He
said he had not been resistant to most of the applicant#s requests even though
he has been troubled by some things including the entry statement being
used. He felt the requested uses might be acceptable. He thought the uses
being requested would still fall short of strip commercial. He was maddened
the applicant had reverted to =he plan with the smaller buildings to the south
as he thought the three larger buildings would be aesthetically stronger.
commissioner Tolstoy stated he was excited about the Recreational C~mwaercial
aspect of the project. He thought the Sports Complex will be compiimented by
Recreational C~mmercial endeavors in close proximity. He said he had a
problem with the General Commercial. He felt clothing would be acceptable
because there is plenty of latitude for sports apparel~ however, he did not
support the inclusion of furniture, electronics, or appliances. He thought
~he applicant had requested a maximum size of 40,000 square feet for general
retail uses.
P C Adjourned Meeting Minutes -3- Februar~ 23, 1994
61
Mr. Bullet said there is currently a maximum cap of 25,000 square feet for
$peciality home improvement retail uses. He said there had previously been a
proposal to raise the cap to 40,000 square feet.
Commissioner Tolstoy did not feel it would be appropriate in the area to have
s 40,000 square foot building with furniture or appliances. He supported
Recreational Commercial with limited commercial being limited to specific
sizes. He did not feel large commercial enterprises are compatible with
Recreational Commercial.
Chairman Barker asked if a size cap was proposed.
Mr. Bullet said there was none proposed at this time.
Mr. Column said a total cap of 35 percent was proposed as the maximum for the
entire project, but there was no cap for any one tenant.
commissioner Tolstoy observed that the study presented regarding the
feasibility for commercial uses did not address the entire City. He thought
the City already has a lot of land designated for commercial and a lot of
con~ercial property is empty. He feared the addition of more commercial would
add to the problem of empty stores and ghost centers.
Chairman Barker observed that when driving down Foothill Boulevard there lea
huge area of unused, open land next to the Spor~s Complex, which is drawing in
people. He felt the city should continue the theme of recreational uses. He
thought a skating rink or other recreational activities should be encouraged,
including Recreational Commercial uses. He feared the opportunity for
recreational uses would be lost. He did not support the sale of refrigerators
and couches. He understood Co~issioner McNlel'e concern about the entr~ay
statement. He felt the corner is important and he thought the center should
be successful for the owner. He was frustrated because the project seemed to
have been piecemealed together. He felt the proposal represented a compromise
recognizing the fact that changes have taken place. He said the commission
recognized that a new look should be taken at the industrial area because of
impacts of what has happened in the last 10 years. He wanted the project to
be something the City and owner would be proud of.
Cum~lssioner Lumpp suggested changing the language to include sporting goods
and sporting apparel. He observed the proposal was to amend the General Plan
to add a Recreational C&~.~ercial use and other landowners could then request
that such · designation be permitted for their property. He did not feel
electronics, furniture, and appliances fit in a Recreational Commercial
categor~ and he thought inclusion of those items was an effor~ to dilute the
intent of modifying the General Plan.
chairman Barker asked if It was clear in the definition that any property
designated Recreational Cmrcial would focus on the theme of recreation.
Mr. Bullet felt that the definition identified that the Spor~s C~mplex
generated the concept so sane other major recreational center would have to be
in proximity before a Recreational C~mmercial use would be permitted.
P C Adjourned Meeting Minutes -4- February 23, 1994
commissioner Lumpp ·greed there is no other place in Rancho Cucamonga tha~
would meet the proposed criteria; however, he felt that amending ~he General
Plan still left the use as available.
Conciseloner Tolstoy said Recreation Con~nercial is a zoning within a specific
plan located near the yMCA, but it is not a General Plan designation.
Commissioner McNiel asked for a response on the entry statement issue.
Mr. Bullet observed tha~ the Con~niesion last dealt with the issue ·t a
workshop and the applicant was directed to bring back · revised plan to show
how they would address it. He said that plan had not been submitted back to
staff and no building permits can be issued until the issue is addressed.
Motion: Moved by Lumpp, seconded by McNiel, to recommend issuance of a
negative declaration and adopt the resolutions recommending approval of
General Plan Amendment 93-02B with modifications to delete the listing of
electronics, furni~ure, and appliance uses. Me=ion carried by the following
vote:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BARKER, LUMPP, MCNIEL, TOLSTOY
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NELCHER -carried
Chairman Barker reopened the public he·ring.
Mr. Mannafine asked for clarification that the General Plan Amendment was
passed with the exception that the language regarding appliances, electronics,
and furniture were s~ricken from the definition.
chairman Barker confirmed that was correct. He ·gain closed the public
he·ring.
Coetaissioner Tolstoy believed the expansion of the uses in the auto service
court was a good idea. He felt the cour% on Archibald and 8th Street was
successful. He observed the design standards were not being changed.
Co~missioner McNlel concurred.
co~missioner Lumpp felt language in ~he Primary Function sac=ion should be
revised by deleting the last ~wo sentences regarding the industrial and offlce
development between between Haven and Millikan.
Chairman Barker questioned the re·son for the verbage.
Mr. Bullet stated that staff was trying to update the existing par·graph
within the Industrial Area Specific Plan, which gives a st·=us and direction
of the area. He felt it could easily be dropped.
c~xmnissioner Lumpp noted the Conwaission was being asked to add · Special
Consideration paragraph regarding 27 acres of mixed-use cmrcial including
P C Adjourned Meeting Minutes -5- February 23, 1994
35 ~ercent of general ret·ll. He Roted that convenience goods and o~her
retail uses are already permitted and conditionally permitted within Subarea 7
· nd he opposed the ·ddition of a blanket statement diluting Subarea 7 to allow
additional retail uses which perhaps would cause problems in other ·teas of
the community with respect to general retail uses. He said he was not tzTing
to hinder the development of this project, but he felt the only ·dditional
co~Mnercial uses should be recreational in nature and gener·l retail is not
appropriate for the area. Be suggested deletion of the Special Consideration
p·ragraph. He thought such an action would be consistent with what the
Commission had reckended for 'the General Plan Amendment. He supported the
expansion of the definition of Automotive Service Court so long as the
existing layout of the project did not change.
C~lszioner McNiel ·eked how General Con~ercial differs from Recreational
Cmrcial.
Mr. Bullet stated there is not currently a listing of Recreational commercial
uses. He s·ld the proposed Special Considerations p·r·gr·ph had merely
referred to the entire r·nge of uses in the Gener·l Cmrcial l·nd use
category. To be consistent with comissioner Lumpp's proposal, he suggested
deletion of the language reg·rding Development Code l·nd use provisions and
inserting language permitting recreation/sporting goods and ·pp·rel retail
uses in order to be consistent with the proposed General Pl·n Amendment.
Co~nissioner McNlel ·eked if the total retail would be 35 percent.
Commissioner Lumpp believed the 35 percent was requested for Gener·l
Cmrclal uses. He thought the 35 percent reference could be deleted beG·use
Gener·l Conzaercial would not be an approved use and the recreation/sporting
uses could be more than 35 percent.
chairman Barker reopened the public he·ring.
Mr. Mannerino felt the proposed delet£on of General Cmrcial would defeat
the purpose of the application. He said they had spent hours in terms of
trying to codify the problem the developer has. He thought they would not get
that many sporting goods and sporting apparel stores In the area. He
acknowledged that the recreational/sporting theme should be carried. He said
they had attempted to carr~ the theme through the various uses. He believed
s~me General C~.~rclal would be necessary to fill the spaces. He thought
there would be reco~nition of the area and uses such as · w~men's bouttque or
video store w~uld probably not fit in. He acknowledged that It does not work
to zone b~ prospective tenant, but he felt there should be zoning by who would
be likely to locate l~ the ·re·. He felt it would be appropriate to have
35 percent of General cmrcial within the center in addition to the
Recreational C~mmerclal. He felt there were no other properties in the City
with the same set of circumstances as the Masi property, so there was not ·
danger of setting · precedent.
Chairman Barker again closed the public hearing.
P C Adjourned Meeting Minutes -6- Febfuzz7 23, 1994
C~eaissioner McNiel felt the debate has gone on too long. He observed that
the property is Industrial and the city has allowed some Comercial and retail
which has continued to grow. He was not sure there is a satisfactory
solution.
Comissioner Lumpp believed convenience uses are already conditionally
permitted within subarea 7. He thought there would be no need to have a
Recreation conMnercial designation if the use is changed to have General
Conwaercial.
Commissioner Tolstoy reiterated that he believes there is enough General
Commercial existing and designated within the City. He felt the addition of
General Commercial to this property would further dilute the retail co~m~unity.
Mr. Bullet said he believed the applicant has stated they want General
Commercial. He indicated staff had brought the matter to the Co~ission with
a readiness to support General Commercial with a 35 percent limitation. He
noted that the matter would go to the City Council for final action. He
suggested a revision to the Special Considerations paragraph to indicate that
recreation/sporting goods and apparel would be permitted.'
Motion: Moved by Lumpp, seconded by McNiel, to recommend issuance of a
negative declaration and adopt the resolution approving Industrial Specific
Plan ~mendment 94-02 with modification to modify the Primar~ Function
paragraph by deleting the final two sentences and the Special consideration
paragraph to permit recreation/sporting goods and apparel retail uses. MOtion
carried by the following vote:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BARKER, LUMPP, MCNIEL, NELCHER, TOLSTOY
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE -carried
indoor batting cage in 12,000 square feet in Building 16, of
approved Conditional Use Permit 91-24, located on 27 at the
southwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and in the
Industrial Park District (Subarea 7) of the 'ial Area Specific
Plan. APN: 229-011-10, 19, 21, and 26 28. (Continued from
Januar~ 26, 1994)
D. - A request to permit a
martial arts studio square feet in Building 16 of previously
approved Permit 91-24, located on 27 acres at the
southwest Foothill Boulevard and Rochester Avenue in the
I District (Subarea 7) of the Industrial Area SpeclfAc
229-011-10, 19, 21, and 26 through 28. (Continued fr~m
26, 1994)
P C Adjourned Meeting Minutes -7- February 23° 1994
RESOLUTION NO. 94-08
1. Masi Partners has filed an application for General Plan ~mendsen~
No. 93-028 as descrit~d in the t:i~:le of this Resolution. Hereinefter Ln ~his
~solu~Aon, ~he 8~Je~ ~neral PI~ ~n~n~ is ~eferr~ ~o as
a~l~ca~lon."
2. ~ ~he 23rd day o~ Feb~a~ 1994, ~he Pl~ing ~lselon oZ
C~ty oZ ~cho ~c~nga conduc~ a duly no~lc~ ~lic he~lq on
a~lica~on.
3. All lqal prer~lsl~es prior ~o Uhe a~lon o~ ~his
B.
Pl~ln~ ~lssion of the City of ~cho ~c~n~a as foilMs
1. This ~ssion her~ s~cl~lcally ~s tha~ 811 o~ ~he Za~8
se~ ~o~h In ~ ~citals, P~ A, o~ ~his ~solution ~ ~e ~ correct.
2. h~ u~n s~s~ial evidence p~ ~o ~his ~ssion
duriq ~ ~re~erenc~ ~l~c ~lq on F~n~ 23, 1994, ~clud~n~
wl~en ~ o~81 staff ~8, t~the: wi~h ~lic ~eet~ny, ~his
~ssion ~r~ 8~ifically ZiPS as ~OIIMS
si~ of ~ Am, ~th O~ F~hill bl~, wU c~let~ In 1993,
Zea~u~s ~~ ~8 a~ivi~ies, ~lud~ a ~ l~e base~ll
s~adia wi~ ap~tely 5,5~ ~a~8, ~ ~es~8 a s~lZican~
al~erati~ ~ ~ 1~ u~ ch~acte~ls~lcs o~ t~ ~ate weal
~s Mn ~oL~ as e a~v~y cen~er ~o p~e concen~ra~ a~Lv~y;
c. b a~l~cation Is cou~s~ent with ~ ~J~tus of the
~C~ ~c~a ~ral PIn for ~ foll~L~
(l) T~ a~lLcatlcn conSUlates ~oully orLen~ uses
w~th~n o~ ~lo of ~ I-IS Fr~ay ~d F~h~ll ~ ~n~erc~ge; and
PLANNZNG COM]4ZSSION RESO SON NO. 94-08
GPA 93-02B, PART A - MASS PARTNERS
Februst7 23, 1994
(2) The application as proposed would create a land use
category which recognizes the importance of Foothill Boulevard as the City's
primary coemercial corridor; and
{3) The application contemplates reglcnall~, oriented uses
along Foothill Boulevard, · major regional transportation corridorJ and
(4) The application would create a Recreational Ccemercial
land use designation intended to promote recreation and retail uses
surrounding the Rancho Cucam~nge Adult Spor~s Park; and
(5) The application would encourage future commercial
activities in planned, organized concentrations to prate non-motorised modes
of tranepoz~cetion.
3. Baled upon the substantial evidence presented to this C~emission
during the above-referenced public hearing end upon the specific findings of
fac~s set forth in paragraphs I and 2 eb~ve, this Canmission hereby finds end
concludes as foliowas
e. That the subject property Is suitable for the uses permitted
in the proposed distric~ in terms cf access, size, and c~epatibllity with
existing land use in the surrounding areel and ._
h. That the proposed amendment would no~ have significant
impacts on the enviz~nment nor the surrounding properties; and
c. Thee the proposed amendment is in nonformance with the
General Plan.
4. Based upon the facts aid information contained in the proposed
Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral rapecam included for
the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning C~mmissinn
finds that there is no substantial evidence that the pr~ect will have ·
significant effect upon the environment and reckmends adoption of a Negative
Declaration based upon the findings as followst
a, That the Ile~atlve De~laration has been prepared in c~8~liance
with the ~alifornia Snviromnental ~uality A~ of 1970, as amended, end the
State ClQk g~idelines promulgated thereunder~ that Said Negative De~laretion
and the Initial study p~epared therefore reflec~ the independent ~udgment of
the Pl~uniaig CMmmieelonl and, further, this C~smlssion has reviewed and
considered the information contained in said Ne~atlve Declaration with rqatd
to the application. ,.
b. That, based upon the changes end alterations which have been
incorporated into the pzolx}sed pr~e¢~, no significant adverSa environnwntal
effef4s will occur.
c. Pursuant ~o ~he provis~ons o~ Section 753.5(c) oE T~le 14
~he Call~ornie C~ie o~ Regulations, ~he Plannin~ Ccatnission ~inds ss
follows: In considerin~ the record as a whole, the Initial Study and
Declaration for the project, there is no evidence' that the proposeS project
w~ll have potential ~or an adverse impact upon w~ldlife resources or the
habitat upon which wlldl~Ze depends. Further, based upon substantial evidence
contained ~n the Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exh~bits, and the
information provideS to the Plann~n~ Canmission during the public hearing, the
Planning Ccaniseton hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as met
forth In Section 753.5(c-l-d) of Title 14 of the Californ~a Code
5. BaseS upon the findings and conclusions set forth ~n
paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Ccemisston hereby reccemends approval
General Plan Amendment No. 93-02B, Par~ &, to add a new land use cattqory
'Recreational CremeroYal' (see Rxhibit
6. The Secretary to th~s Coxemission shall certify to the adoption
this Resolution.
APP~O~D AND ADO I 23RD DAY OF I~BRUAAY 1994.
P , IqANGIO CUrAMOebA
&
l, Brad Bullet, 2ecre~ary of the Plannine C~mmission of the City of Kancho
C~cemcngn, do bsrel~y certify that the fore~in~ Resolution was duly' and
r~larly lntx~x~ced, posed, and adopted ~y tam PlmmLnq CommiesLon of the
City of I~nCbO ~acsmo~a, at · regular merlin9 of the Plannin~ Commission he~d
on the 23~d gay of February lge4, by the follo~ln~ vo~e-t~-wl~z
AYBS z CCtOtlSSlOJrZltf z MRKXR, LUMPP, MCHIEL, TOLSTOY
.A~2ZNT: CO~qlS21041Zltlz
GENEI~L PLAN AMENDMENT 93-02B, PART A
Recreat&onal Commercialz Develolament of recreation facilities and retail uses
shall be encouraged along Foo=hill Boulevard surrounding the Rancho Cucmmonga
Adult Spor~s Park near ~he intersection of Rochester Avenue. The baseball
stadium and year-round spor~s ac~ivitiee in the Spor~s Park create · unique
opportunity ~o provide secondary region-serving special=y retail uses tha~ are
no~ major general merchandise departhenS s~ores or food or drug s~ores. They
generally use approx4ma~ely 3,500 - 55,000 square fee~ of gross leasable area
and require sites wl~h high visibility and high ~reffic counts. These centers
~ypically have convenient freeway access and draw their cus=omers fr~m wi=hin
· five ~o =an mile radius. Uses in ~his ca~egox7 are regional in nature end
no~ normally found in neighb~rhood cumnercial can=ere. These ~ypee of
occupancies oould include re=allers such as sporting goods and sporting
apparel.
SXHXBXT &
KESOLUTZON NO. 94-09
A I~OLUTXON OF THE PLANNZNG COMMISSZON OF THB CXTY OF
RANCliO CUCAMONGA, CALZFORNIA, EBCO~4ENDING APPROVAL OF
THB GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 93-02B, PART B, REQUESTING TO
AMEND THE GBME!~.~.I, PLAN LAND USE MAP FROM 'rNDUSTRXAL PARK
TO R.BCRL~TTONAL COMMERCIAL FOR 2'7 ACRES OF LAND X,OCAT~D
AT TH~ SOUTHWEST CORNER OF FOOTHIM, BOULeVaRD MID
ROCH~ST'F~ AVXNU~, KANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFOIUII&, AND
)IAXI~G FINDINGS IN SUPPORT 'r~e~XOF - APNx 229-011-10,
19, 20, 21, AND 26 THROt.~H 28.
1. Masi Paten·rE has fLIed an application for General Plan
Amendment No. 93-02B as described In the title of this Resolution.
Heretnafter in this Resolution, the subject General Plan Amendment is referred
to ·s 'the ·pplication. '
2. On the 23rd day of February 1994, the Plann/mJ Caseslesion of the
City of Rancho Cuclmonga conducted · duly noticed public hearing on ~
application.
3. All leqal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution
have occurred.
Nee, T~D~FOU, It is hez~by found, detemined, and resolved by the
Pltll~lzx~ C~mullliOA Of the City Of ]~Jlcho Cucamonga as foilMs
1. This ComLtselon hezlby specifically .finds that all of the fac~s
se~ forth ~n the l~cital·, Pan A, of this Resolut/o~ a:e t~ue ~nd correct.
2. Resed upon subetutial e~ldence ~xteEented to thl· ~_~M~mLSllon
du:~J~ the abo~lfmnced public hea:~ on Febcua~y 23, 1994, including
w~ltten a~d o:al sl~f :sports, together with ~mbl/c testimony, this
Commission Mrey IpcLfically finds as fOIlMS
a. b aWlication applies to approxisately 27 so:so of land,
at t~e 8markeast c~zner of Foothill hi·yard ~d i~checter Avenue with a
f~ntaee ~ 8F~x~xl~ately 1,250 fee~ alone Fobhill S~ulevazd and a similar
ciepth end LI pzeelmtly vetrest except for the Masi Winery currently halrig used
as the Victory Chapel end loeBins off ion. said property .Is currently
designated as Sub·re· 7 (Industrial Park) of the Industrial 'Area S~ecific
Plan; and
b. b ai~lLcatLon a~lioa to propexiLes which have been
appro~sd for develop·ant of a miwnd.-use center including mr 260,0OO square
feet: of industrial, office, recreation, autcto'tLv~ lex~,Lce, convenience sales
and services, snd b~lJ~ell ItlpT~x)rt services through Conditional Use Permit
91-24; arid
PLANNZNG COMI4ZSSZON RESOL ZON NO. 94-09
GPA 93-02~, PART B - !4ASZ PKRTN;RS
Februiry 23, 1994
PNJt 2
c.. The property CO ohm nor~:h of the subject site is deei~neted
as m~xed uses including Casaercial, Office, ~d Residen~lm~ ~d Is vacant.
The prc~ny ~o ~he ~s~ Is dss~na~ lndus~rial Park and Is vac~. Thm
pro~ny ~o ~hs eas~ ~s designa~ Indus~rial P~k ~d Is dsvelo~
~gazzc~l w~ne~. The pretty ~o ~he sou~h ~s desl~a~ Indus~rial P~k ~d
Is develo~ wl~h ~ ~cho ~c~n~a Adul~ S~ns P~k] ~d
d. The a~lica~on a~l~em to profiles l~a~ within S~ea
7 or the Industrial ~ea 5~c~ic Plu; ~
e. The s~Je~ pro~n~em adjoin ~he ~c~ ~c~a ~ul~
S~s P~k, ~ea~uring yea-round s~s ac~vl~es; ud ~ ~cho ~c~n~a
S~adl~, a m~nor lea~t baseball s~adi~ wl~h a~rox~ely 5,500 sea~s, which
has sl~lcu~ly al~er~ ~he land use characteristics of
ud
~. S~m~en~ to ~he initial a~roval o~ the
de~l~n~ (i.e., ~ndl~lonal Use ~mit 92-24), ~ Cl~y
intersection o~ F~hlll ~lev~d ud ~chester Avenue as
in~end~ ~o pr~e concen~rat~ a~ivl~y~ ud
g. ~e a~lica~on consulates r~lon n~l~ ~ s~-r~on
se~l~ retail usa all~ under ~he ~neral ~rc~al r~la~ons o~ ~he
h. T~ Cl~y'e ~neral Plu ~le, ~l~cies, ~ objectives
relate ~o ~he a~lica~on as
(1) ~lon oo~V um should tur~und t~ 1-15 Frmay
ud F~hlll ~l~d ln~erc~ge; ~
(2) ~h~ll ~1~ Is ~ ~ cmrcial corr~dor~
(3) ~lll ~lev~d Is a mJor eas~s~ trus~a~on
corrl~r ~ ~ ~ln~ 2
(4) ~lonally orien~ uses s~ld N l~a~ In close
(S) ~t~ cmrcLal a~lvl~es s~ll ~ orVuiz~ ln~o
pl~, ~ ~n~tratio~ ~o ~te ~r~it ~un~lem and
3. ~ u~ t~ s~stutial ~l~n~ ~e~nt~ to this ~lsmion
ra~s ~ ro~h ~ ~agza~t I ~ 2 ~, ~his ~lst~on ~r~ finds and
conclude as roll~s
PLANNING CO~MIS N RESOLUTION NO. 94-09
GP& 93-028, PART B - MASI PARTNERS
FebL~aary 23, 1994
Page 3
a. That the subject property is zuitabZe for the uses permitted
in the proposed distrio= ~n toms of access, size, and compat~bllity with
existing land use in the surrounding area; and
b. That the proposed mnendment would not have zignificsnt
impacts on the environmnt nor the surrounding properties; and
c · That the proposed amendment Is ~n conformante with the
General Plan.
4. Based upon the fec~s and information contained ~n the proposed
Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for
the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning C--Lesion
finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a
significant effe~c upon the environment and recmnd· adoption of a Negative
Declaration based upon the findings as foil·wee
a. That the Negative Declaration hem been prepared Ln
compliance with the California Environmental Quality kc~ of 1970, a· amenned,
and the State CBQA gnidelinee pramulgated thereunder; that said No·salve
Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent
Judgment of the PI~AAIog Cc~miesion; and, further, this Carol·zion has
reviewed and considered the information contained en said Negative Declaration
with regard to the application.
h. That, based upon the changes and ·Iterations which h~ve been
incorporated lntn the proposed project, no significant adverse environmental
effects will occur.
c. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14
Of the Gelifoznia Code of Regulations, the Plefmiog ~:8misslon find· as
foil·wee In considezin~ the record as · whole, the Initial Study and Negative
Declaratinn foe ~he project, thor1 is no evidence that the proposed proJec~
will have potential for an adverse lmpac~ upon wildlife resources or the
habitat upon which wildlife depends. Further, based upon substantial evidence
contained in ~be Begetlye Declaration, the staff reports end exh~bite, and the
lnfomtio~ prowldeal %0 the Planning Cuemission during the public heirLog, the
PlumLAg CalmSeel·el hereby reb~t· the pzleumFclon of edverno effe¢~ as set
forth in lea~Lofi ?SJ.S(c-l-d) of Title l& of the california Code of
l, Biled ~ the fllMSiegl lad mclulionl leC forth in
para{.~c'ildte 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this ComEt·etch hereby recaemends approval of
General Plan AmeAdme~t No. 93-028, Piz~ B, ~o designate 27 acres of land at
the southwest COrner of PooChill Boulevard and Rochester Avenue as
6. The 8e:z~cary to this Carols·ion shall COr~lfy to the adoption
of this ReanlutLon.
PLANNING COHMISSTON PESO ION NO. 94-09
GPA 93-02B, PMI, T B - HAST PARTNERS
FebruL-7 23, 1994
PaVe 4
APPI%OVED AND ADOPTED I 23RD DAY OF FEBRUARY 1994.
P RANCHO CUCa~ONGA
B
ATTEST z
I, Brad Bullet, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucmn~nga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and
regularly introduced, passed, and adol~ed by the Planning Commission of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Ccenission held
on the 23rd day of February 1994, by the following vote-to-witx
AYEB z CGt~ISB IONleRS z BAi~KER, LUMPP, MCNIEL, TOLSTOY
NOwSt CX~MMIBBIONERSz NONE
ABBBNT: COMMZSBZONEBSx NELCHER
·
tt ~
RESOLUTION NO. 94-10
k R~8OLD~TION OF Iris pLANNING COMMISSION OF TH~ CITY OF
RANC~O CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, P~ECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF
INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT ND. 94-02 TO
NODXFY SUBAR~X 7 TO ~ LIMITED COI4N~RCIAL ~ND TO
MODIFY TH~ DEFINITION OF 'AUTOMOTIVE SERVICE COURT', AND
MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF.
1. Jack Masi ham filed an application for Industrial Area Specific
Plan ~mendment 94-02, as described in the title of this Resolution.
Hmrm~nafter In this Resolution, the subJec~ Conditional Uso
referrid to am "the application.'
2, On the 23rd day of February 1994, the Planning
City of Rancho cucmnga conducted · duly noticed public hearing on the
application end concluded said hearing on that date,
3, All legal prerequisites prior tc the adoption of this Resolution
hive occurred,
B.
NOW, TBIR~FORI, it is hereby feund, determined, and resolved
Planning ~lssion of the City of Rancho Cocamonga as
1, This C~mmission hereby specifically finds that
set forth In the Recitals, Pert A, of this Resolution ere true and correct,
2, Baled upon lubltantlll evidence presented to this ~ission
during the ave-referenced public hearing on February 23, 1994, including
written ind oral stiff reports, t~gsther with lmbiic testim~ny, this
Commission hereby specifically f~nds as
l, T~I l~licatlon e~ziel tO property located withAn S~berea 7
o4t the IndustrIal/keen I~ecific Planl and
h. The ln~i~sed amendments will not have a significant Inlmct on
the envizeaslat as evidenced by the conclusions and findinfs of the Initial
study, Pats
3. Based nlmn the substantial evidence presented to this C~--'llsion
during the ~b=ve-referenced public hearing and u~n the specific findings of
laces met forth In paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this CcmlAllion hereby finds and
concludes ae foll~sz
a. The meend~ent does
the General Plan and wall pr~v/de for development within the district in ·
manner c~neletent with the General Plan and with related develc~mentl end
' , 75
PLANNING COMMISSION RES( TION NO. 94-10
IASP 94-02 - JACK MASI
Februtt7 23, 1994
Page 2
b. The proposed amendment is consistent with the objectives of
the Industrial Area Specific Plan, and =he purposes of the district in which
the site Is located; and
c. The proposed amendment is in compliance with each of the
applicable provisions of the Industrial Area specific Plan; and
d. The proposed amendment will not be detrimental to the public
health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to proporgies or
improvements in the vicinity; and
e. The proposed amendment will no~ be de~rimental to the
objectives of the General Plan or the Industrial area Specific Plan.
4. Baled upon the fac~s and information con~ained in the propoleo
Negative Declaration, together with all written end oral reports included for
the environmental assessment for the application, the Plsnnin9 C~emiesion
finds that there is no substantial evidence that the proJee~ will have ·
significant effec~ upon the environment and recmnds adoption of a Negative
De~laration based upon the findings as
a. That the Negative Declaration has been prepared in
with the California Invironmentai 9uality Act of 1970, as amended, and the
State C~9A guidelines promulgated thereunder7 that said Negative Declaration
and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflec~ the independent Judgment of
the Planning commission7 and, fur~ber, this ~----~ssion has reviewed and
considered the information contained in said Negative Declaration wit~ regard
to the application.
b. That, based upon the changes and alterations which have ~een
incorporated into the proposed project, no significant adverse environmental
effects will scour.
c. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.S(c) of Title 14 of
the California Code of Regulations, the Plenn~ ~lssion finds aS
fOllO~S: In considerinS the record as a whole, the Initial Stud~ and Negative
Declaration for the pro~ect, there is no evidence that the proposed project
viii have pgtentLeX for an adverse ~mpa~: upon wildfire resources or the
habitat upoeadLtch wildlife deponds. Pureher, based upon substantial evidence
contained la tbl II~ativw Dtcll~atiea, the Itaff rl~rts and exhibits, and the
lnfomtl~a ~-~vidmi to the Planaim] ~--lllien durim] the imPlie hearin9, the
Planning CosllktelLou hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect. as set
forcA in SectLoss ?53.$(c-l-d) of Title 14 of the CalifoL-nia code of
ne;ulations,
S. Based upon the findings and conclusions se~ forth in paragraphs
1, 2, 3, and · above, this C~smission hereby resolves as follower
a, That the Planning ~,,,--LssLon of the City of Rancho cucssones
hereby ands approval of Xndustriai Area spscific Plan kssndmsnt
94-02, Subares ?, Primary Function and Special Consideration, and Table XXX-2,
as attached.
~:Ltt~,jt ~
PLANNING COMMISF N RESOLUTION NO. 94-~0
IASP 94-02 - JAC.. MAS1
February 23, 1994
6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the ldop~ion of
APPROVID AND ADOPTE r 23RD 0AZ OF FEBRUARY 1994.
p . RANCliO CUCAMONGA
BY
&
Z, Brad BuXlar, Secretary of the Plannin9 Cm--ismlOn Of the City of Rancho
Cucu~nga, do hereby certify that the foreqoLn9 Resolution was duly and
re~larly introduced, palled, and adopted by the Planning ~_'~--'~ll£On Of the
City o~ Rencho Cucamonga, at · regular meetinq of the Ptannin~ C~maislion held
on the 23rd day of Fabrua:7 1994, by the follo~lne vote-to-wiu=
AYEIS COMMISSIONERS: ~ARKER, LUMPP, MCNIEL, TOLSTOY
NOEBz COffi4ISBIONERSz HONE
ABSZNTs COMMISSIONERSx MELCHER
TABLE 111-2
LAND USE TYPE DEFINITIONS
AUTOMOTIVE SERVIC~ COURTs An integrated cluster of related automotive service
activities, which typically include= gee stations/service stations, with or
without ancillary uses such as car washes end food mar~s~ gener·l eut~e~tive
service and repair including mufflers, shocks, alignments, brakes, oil
changes, lubrications, =une-ups, sm~g checks, tire repair and replacement, and
transmiseions~ installation of air conditioning, car phones,
windshields, and upholstery] windshield =inting$ sale of auto par~s] and other
related services.
Auto couxwcs shell comply with the following design criteries
- Maximum Sizes 4 acres.
- Maximum frontage along a major or secondary arterial sirmats 300
feet.
~ No access to the si~e will be permitted directly off say major
arterial.
Service bays and pump islands shell be screened fr~a all ma~or an_d
secondary ar~eriels through · ccsabinetion of berms, landscaping, low
wails, end building
An approprie~e ccebination o~ berms, landscaping, and archi~ecturel
elements ·hall be provided around the entire parime~er of the site
minimize ~he lmpa~ of the auto cour~ use· fr-as ~he existing and
future surrounding uses.
- Outd~r s~orage of Inoperative vehicles, par~s, or equlpmen~ is
prohibited.
- All work shall be COnducted indoors.
- All slgna~e shall be limited ~o signs appzoved under s Uniform sign
pr~rss.
~~ Sub~Eea 7 occupies an area directly sou~h at
Boulevard which reprementa an importan~ land umo ~9~ ~n ~ha Cl~y'
I~um~rial ~a ~d a l~go ~m~or planned c~n~y ~o ~ho north.
~ul~d is the cl~y'm p=~ cmrci&~ corridor ~nd st~em am m 9stray to
~h~ Ci~. ~on9 ~hlll ~ul~vard, the ~nt~rs~c~ions at H~ven, ~Ll~l~n, ~d
Rochester A~nuee have b~n designa~ as activity cen~ers ~o pr~e
concen=ra~ e~lvit~ ~d es~lish · unite des~ ~hm.
s~cl%l ~nsidera~lon 'F~hlll Boulev~d Is a ~Jor a~erial which
projec~ =o c~ a significan~ vo~ of ~raffic. In ~rder ~
vehi~l~ access probl~s, ~he min~ parce~ size r~lr~n~ e~ong F~hil~
~ulev~d Is 2 acres ~d min~ p~cel width Is 200 f~.
For pro~ny within ~he ~und~les of ~he Haven Avenue ~erlay Die~rict, refer
~ ~he ~rla~ Dls=ric= for a ~lfl~ lls~ of ~ 1~ uNs ~d
develo~n~ crl=erie.
The S~ ~rn~dino ~un~y Law ~d Justice ~n~er ne~ ~he comer of F~hlll
~ulev~d ~d Haven Avenue ~y include a de=en~loa facility If ~n~cl~l c~u~
facilities ~e provide.
~ ~he eee~ side of Ha~n Avenue, noah of ~ Bigger, ~l~n~ ~
provisions for ~he ~neral ~rcial Dls~rl~ e~ll e~ly ~o K ~ ~ ~
edJo~ning no~herl~ ~lding. Develo~n= ~ use of satellite ~lldlngs
=he K ~ ~n~er ~ s~ec= =o provisions of ~ I~us~rial ~ea
Ply. - -
A= ~he ~u~h~e~ comer o~ F~=hlll ~ulev~d ~d ~hee~er Avenue, ad~oining
~he ~cho ~c~nga ~ult S~S P~k a~ ~c~ ~nga S~adl~,
recree=lon/e~lng ~e ~ e~rel re~ail uses s~ll ~ ~l~
~he pl~ 27-acre ~ u~ cen~er.
To ~e~ ~d e~e ~ ~ ~f ~ ~anl~, s~cial ~nsidera~lons
shall ~ given ~o ~ ~all~y of sl~e ~sl~, ~chl~ure, ~ l~dscap~ng of
all profiles ad~a~en~ ~ ~ X-lS F~ay. a~ra~l~ surNning uf ou~d~r
~rk, loading, ~re~ ~eas, r~f- ~ g~~ ~l~n~
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: February 9, 1994
TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Co~ission ,'~
FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner
BY: Beverly Luttrell, Associate Planner
SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT ANO GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 93-02B
~ASI A request to amend the land use designation from
Industrial Park to General Comercial for 15 acres of land
extending along Foothill Boulevard to a parallel line
approximately 520 feet south, within the Masi Plaza
development, located at the southwest corner of Foothill
Boulevard and Rochester Avenue - APN: 229-011-10, 19, 21,
and 26 through 28. Related File: Conditional Use Permit
91-24.
P~OJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION:
A. Action Requested by Applicant: Approval of a General Plan Amendment
and issuance of a Negative Declaration.
B. ~urroundin~ Land Use and Zoning:
North - Vacant~ Terra Vista Planned Co~unityl MOC (Mixed, Office,
Comimercial, Residential ).
South - Sports Complex~ Subarea 7 (Industrial Park), Industrial
Area
Specific Plan.
East - Aggazzotti Wineryl Subarea 8 (Industrial Park), Industrial
Area Specific Plan.
West - Vacantl Subarea 7 (Industrial Park), Industrial Area
Specific Plan.
C. General Plan Desitnations:
Proje~ Site - Industrial Park
North - Medium ~esidential (8-14 ~welling units per acre)
South - Industrial Perk
East - Industrial Park
West - Industrial Park
D. Site Characteristics: The primarily vacant site is approximately 27
acres in size and is the site of an approved project including 32
multi-tenant industrial and restaurant buildings (Conditional Use
Permit 91-24 ) · The apl~llcant is currently in the process of
revising the approved site plan and seeking approval for several
commercial and recu:eatio~ non-construction Conditional Use Permits.
pLANNING CO~4ISSION STAFF REPORT
GPA 93-82B - MASI
Febl-~a~y 9, 1994
Page 2
LAND USE ANALYSIS=
A. BackVround:
1. Industrial Area Specific Plan:
Suburea 7 of t_he Industrial Area Specific Plan stretches along
the south side of FOothill Boulevard from Day Creek to Deer
Creek, · distance of approximately two miles. Although it
designated 'Industrial Park' in the Inc~ustrial Ares Specific
Plan, land use activities currently per~itted include not only
traditional light manufacturing, but also a full range of
office, aam%~istrative, business supper%, and other business
and personal related services, including convenience retail,
entertainment, and automotive services. A list of permitted
and conditionally permitted uses can be found in Exhibit
This very broad mix of uses is intentional. It was devised to
provide a viable transition between the industrial and
enploymant areas to the south and the residential/re,all
develolmaents to ~he north- It also recognizes that Fonthill
Boulevard, as the major east-west artery coanec~ing to the 1-15
Freeway, will eventually attract high velume services needed in
the cureunity but not appropriately located within either the
industrial ares =o the south ox- the residential/retail areas to
the north.
At the same ttme, the currant regulations stop short of
allowing a full range of unrestrioted retail ac~ivities in
Subarea 7. The City~s current land use ~la. for FOothill
Boulevard recognizes that the co=enmity must bulance the amount
and location of retall/coe~ercial establishments along the
antiN 6-1/2 mile corridor so as nct to creato a negative
impact On existing re,all centers in the older par~ of the
co~wmanity or alread~ planned onmercial centers elsewhers-
The intenttOn is to s~rike a balance. Xdeally, an ample J~unt
of conmercial zOning should be available to acOo~date needed
retail services within the c~e~,~it~ without creating such an
over~bumdanOn of commercially zOned land that it cannot be
developed to its potential, resulting in marginal or temporex7
land uses.
2 · Previous Applicattous z
The Planning Ccemission reviewed a request to expand the list
of permitted and Oonditionally permitted uses in Subares 7 of
the Industrial Area Specific plan (I~PA 92-02) in March 1992.
The list of uses originally requested included a broad range of
re~all/c~mercial uses. Through the Pinuning Ccessission review
PLANNING CO~4ISSION STAFF REPORT
GPA 93-02B - MASI
February 9, 1994
Page 3
process, the request for such a broad array of additional
retail uses was denied. At the time of the previous request,
it was the Planning Commission ' s belief that the community
could not support the broad range of additional
retail/commercial establishments on this property without a
negative impact on the existing retail centers in the older
part of the community or already planned commercial centers
elsewhere. The Amendment in its final form as approved by City
Council on June 3, ~992, only included the addition of
"Specialty Building Supplies and Ho~e Improvement" and
"Automotive Service Court" as conditionally permitted uses.
3. Prol~osed Land Uses:
The applicant has requested a Change in the land use
designation from Industrial Park to General Commercial. The
General Plan states that the General Con~ercial Caregary
categorized by a bronder range of use activities' than any of
the cowenercial desigeations. This category includes local
commercial, community shopping/office complexes, and commercial
uses surrounding the regional center. The General Plan intends
that future comercial activities be organized into planned,
group concentrations as opposed to being organized in a linear
fashion.
AS an alternative to this the applicant has presented an option
which proposes a 'special retail allowance' for their site and
other 'eligible' sites which meet a set of locational end size
criteria (noted in Exhibit: "B"). The proposed uses include
sports related re=all which is to include uses suCh as hobby
supplies; arts end crafts supplies; video/cd rentals end sales,
sporting ~oods, spor~s wear and accessories, western wear, and
antique end arc sales. The applicant contomplates a 40,000
square foot cap on these uses.
Additionally, "specialty retail" is proposed us part of this
alternative which would include suCh uses as housewares,
appliances, electronics, home furnishings and accessories, auto
parts and accessories, sewing supplies, health and beauty
supplies, card and gift stores, plants and garden supplies;
apparel, foodware and related items; variety stores and other
related specialty retail items. The applicant proposes a
25,000 scXuare foo~ cap on these uses.
The applicant also proposes that a "retail allowance" be
assigned whiCh would be eclual to 35 percent of the total
planned scXuare footage for the project or 85,000 square feet.
Also, the applicant prnposea that these uses only be permitted
in certain building locatious.
PLANNING CO~4ISSION STAFF REPORT
GPA 93-02B - MASI
February 9, 1994
Page 4
However, both of these alternatives are similar to the request
that the Planning Comission denied on April 8, 1992 (ISPA 92-
02 ).. If the Comission considers this option as a valid
proposal, then serious consideration should be given to
redesignating the southeast corner of ROchester Avenue and
Foothill ROulevard. This property has a similar setting to the
site being considered and is in closer proximity to existing
conmercially zoned property and the I-~5 Freeway Corridor.
B. Land Use Issues: Notwithstanding the Concerns noted abo~e which
were voiced by the Planning Co~tesion on the previous application,
there are several factors which lend support to the concept of
additional co-aercial uses on the site.
Sports Complex:
The Construction and Completion of the Sports Complex in early
1993 has crated a synergy and a niche f~r sports oriented
commercial which was not anticipated by the City's General Plan
or Industrial Ares Specific Plan. Additionoily, the locati~!x
of the stadium ~hysically separates the project site from the
industrially zoned ares to the south.
2- Prox'lm4'~], to 1-15 Freewa~:
The F-oject site Ir- situsted 1/4 mile wast of the 1-15 Freeway
corridor which makes it attractive for region serving
comercial development.
3. Activit= Center:
The Corner of P~chester Avenue and Fnothill Boulevard has been
designated an Acttvit7 Center by the Foothill Boulevard
Specific Plan as well as the Industrial Area Specific Plan. AS
such, this intersection must comply with specific design
standards which generally provide for a more formolized and
urban appearance. Such aspects as sits design, reduced
anthecks, handscape, pedestrian orientation, landscape#
l~Lghting, and architectural Concept must he considered. These
t~pes of special dasl~n onusiderations set apart Activity
Center intersections fr~ other intersections along Foothill
Boulevard and therefore, conld make the area more suitable for
Coosaercial development.
PLANNING CO~4ISSION STAFF REPORT
GPA 93-82B - MASI
February 9, 1994
Page 5
C. Economic Issues:
1. Market Analysis:
In order to evaluate ~he need and viability of designating ~he
site as General Comercial, staff requested an economic
analysis and -~ket study. The applicant submitted the
attached "Trade Area and Land Use Analysis" report. The study
was conducted by Claire and ASsociates and examines the
viability of designating the project site as General
Commercial. The study exam~es the existing and future trade
area demographic characteristics available =o support
commercial and analyzes the attributes and constraints of the
site. The study recomends that the General Plan be amended to
designate the site as General Co~nercial.
In reviewing ~he report, staff has identified the following
deficiencies with the study:
a. The need for additionall= zoned comercial land within the
comsunit~ is not clear1= demonstrated.
The study does not address how add~tional comercial land
is necessar~ within the context of the Industrial Area
Specific Plan, the cornunity and the region. It is not
clear ~om the study why more on-e-ercial land is needed
beyond what is already planned for in the City.
b. The stud= is site specific onl=.
The study is site specific and does not address the City
wide impact of the proposed land use change to add more
onmerciel land. Previous studies have indicated that we
have an abundance of comercially zoned properties.
c. The s=ud~ does not take into consideration already
desi~Ated connnerciall~ zoned property.
The steady acknowledges the demand (i.e., 'aggl~neration')
for secondary region-serving re~ail and commercial service
in the vicinity of the planned Victoria Gardens Regiousl
Shopping Canter. Bowever, the study should indicate that
there is already approximately 300 acres of conxmercial
propolicy designated along Foothill BOulevard and around
the Victoria Gardens project that can fulfill this
demand. The study should analyze whether the existing
designations are adequate to meet the retail needs of the
trade ares.
PLANNING CO~4ISSION STAFF REPORT
GPA 93-02B - MASI
February 9, 1994
Page G
d. Effective buying income of the trade area is not anall;zed
in relation to existing and planned co~nercial properties.
The study projects an effective buying income within the
trade area of over $3 billion in the year 2010, and total
retail store sales of $6 14,002,383. In order to give
meaning to ~hese figures, the study should analyze the
amount of existing and planned co,=aercial land and their
projected total retail sales. In o~her words, will
existing and lmlanned colercial properties meet or exceed
the buying power of the trade area?
e. The stud~; does not acknowledVe the recent cou~letion of
several co~nercial centers.
The study references sales 'leakagem in the trade area,
and particularly Rancho Cucamonga. It should no~e the
recent reversal of this trend with the completion of
several commercial centers, particularly secondary regico-
serving centers, such as ~he TeTra Vista Town Center
( Target, Mervyn ' s, Boss, Montgomery Wards, Service
Merchandise} end Fonthill Marketplace (Price Club, Wal-
Mart). This has resulted in an increase in sales tax
revenue for the City of Rancho Cucamonga, whereas most of
the other cities in the region have seen declining or
stagnant sales ~ax revenues. Whereas the region posted a
2.6 percent loss in the second quarter of 1993, the Cit~/
of ~ancho Cucamonga saw an increase of 11 · 3 percent in
taxable sales ( see Exhibit mD' ) ·
f. The study does not consider pending General Plan Amendment
recXuests ·
Three such requests ere currently being processed through
the Cit-fz 25 acres at the northeast comer of Spruce
Avenue and FcoChill Boulevard, 12 acres at the southeast
corner of the 1-15 Freeway and Base Line Road, and the
General Dynamics site which cou/d lx~centially add 200
acres of mixed-use commercial lend ~o the City- The
c,~m,lative impaot of all these recpaests is si~nificent.
g. The s~udy does no= Juatif= the scope of retail uses
recXuested.
The study states that the trade area could measily support
100,000 scXuars fee~ of sulm-regico and regico-serving uses
that ere no~ major general merchandise department stores,
food or drug stores.' The study further defines these
uses as esecondary region-serving specialty retail
uses...approximately ~0,000 - 40,000 square feet," such as
PLANNING CO~4ISSION STAFF REPORT
GPA 93-02B - MASI
February 9, 1994
Page 7
discount retailers. However, ~he applicant ~ s request
includes local-serving retail uses (see Exhibit "B') which
typically are found in neighborhood shopping centers.
D. Consideration of Alternative Designations: TO provide
Co~zission with alternatives to =he existing and proposed
designations, staff has included an analysis of categories similar
in character to those under discussion. Office and residential uses
were not considered viable land use alterna~ives. Staff examined
the following lend use alternatives=
1. Limited Spor~s or Recreation Related Commercial= Although no
such land use category exists in the General Plan, a
specialized onn~nercial definition could be developed and added
to the Industrial Area Specific Plan, Subarea 7 as a
condinionally permitted use. This cosercial usage would take
into account the presence of the Sports ~lex and would thus
acknowledge the unanticipated m~ket this facility has
created. Potential uses would include sporting good stores,
sportswear and accessory s~ores, sports collectables and
trophies, and sports equipment rentel, repair, and sales.
The timited Sporte/Recreatico Conmercial designation would
allow for a specific type of retail that would be directly
related to the Sports Complex. Staff could support thiq option
which could be processed as an Industrial Area Specific Plan
Amendment to expand ~he list of conditionally ~ermi~.ed uses
within Subarea 7. However, the applicant does no~ support this
option because of its ]4m4tetiO~ on the type of retail allowed.
2. General Co~aercial with · cap of 40~000 Sc~uare Feet: This
category would be identical to the General CoBercial
designation requested by the applicant except that a cap of
40,000 square feet would be added to any lndivid~l user. This
square foot limitation would oe~eusibly eliminate larger retail
Users such a K-Mart, HGne Depot, Circuit City, etc., which
could loca~e elsewhere in General Cce~ercial areas. Even with
~his 1 { -{ tation, it would be adding additional General
C~mmrcial uses to the Foothill Boulevard corridor without the
JUstifica~iou to support
3. Ccmunit~ Coemercialz The General Plan defines this categnry
as innended ~o provide residents with a greater' range of
services and merchandise than found at the neighborhood
co~mmrcial level. Businesses located within
Comercial deslg~ations tend to provide genaral merchandise.
The amount of gross leasable area ranges from 100,000 to
300,000 square feet. These canters here a trade area with a 3
to 5 mile radius and are between 15 to 50 acres in size.
Centers within Ccemunit7 C~mercial areas often include the
pLANNING CO~4ISSION STAFF REPORT
GPA 93-02B - MASI
February 9, 1994
Page 8
same range of retail and service uses found ~n region~l centers
and typically accommodate a junior depar~_ment store or a
variety store. E~n~les include= Foothill Marketplace (Price
Club, Wal-Mart) and the Terra Vista Town Center. Staff canno~
support ~his request because of ~he extent of commercial uses
which could be added to the site and the lack of justification
for additional C~unity C~ercial uses on Foothill Boulevard.
4. Industrial Park (Subarea 7).. The existing designation has no
inherent probl~-a in staff~s opinion and would still be an
appropriate land use. Adjacent propert~ to =he west is
designated for Industrial Park, as is land on ~he east side of
Rochester Avenue. This arrangement of industrially designated
land in Subarea ? coulcl allow for a viable development in the
future. Staff could suppor~ the existing designaticm on the
site since Subarea 7 allows a full range of office, business
suppor~ services, business supply retail, convenience retail,
recreation, entertainment, and certain automotive services.
E.' CONCLUSION:
Upon review of possible land use designations, staff has determined
a recommended course of action which the Pl~-ning Com~ssion could
take..
1 · I!~ -~ted S~or=s/Recreation ~erci&l .. If the C~-w~ esion
believes that Lint'Lied Spor~s/Recreation Co-wercial USes are
most appropriate, then s~aff should be a~c=ed =o ~re~are a
Resolution of Approval ~o the Cit~ Council for an Industrial
Area Specific Plan Amendment. This use would be added as a
con~itionally permitted use to Subarea 7~ Industrial Park of
the Industrial Area Specific Plan. It is staff~s opinion that
the following facts for findings can be made..
a. The subJec~ proper~y is suitable for the USes permitted in
the proposed Industrial Area Specific Plan amendment end
is cmel~mtible with existing and surrounding land use
desigea~ioUS as evil-need by ~he sirens being hordeteA on
the south b~ the Spor~s Complex which has oreatsd a unique
op~or~unity for recreation-related co~sercial.
b. The proposed amendment will not have siqnificen~ im~ac~cs
on ~he exvir~eiment nor on ~he surrounding properties as
evidenced b~ the findings and conclUSions listed in
Per~s I & lI of the Initial Environments1 Assessment of
this applica~ion.
c. The proposed amendment does no~ exhl~l~ en~ c~s~flicts with
~ provisions of the General Plun end the IndUStrial Area
Speoifio Plan.
pLANNING COM4ISSION STAFF REPORT
GPA 93-02B - MASI
February 9, 1994
Page 9
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: Staff has reviewed Part I of the Initial
Study and completed Part II and has found no significant adverse
environmental impacts that will occur as a result of the proposed
General Plan Amendment.
CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a public hearing in
the Inland Valle= Dail= Bulletin newspaper, the property has been
posted, and notices were sent to all property owners within 300 feet of
the project site.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff rec~mnends that the Planning Co~ssion reckend
denial of General Plan Amendment 93-02B and direct staff to initiate an
kndustrial Area Specific Plan Amendment as discussed above.
Respec ly submitted,
City Planner
BB:BLzmlg
Attachments: EXhibit "Am - General Plan and In~us~riel Area Spe~-ific
Plan
Amendment Location Map
Exhibit "Bm - Ap~licant's Justification Statement
Exhibit "Cm - List of Uses - Su/~rea 7
Exhibit "D" - Retail Sale Figures
Tra~e Area and Land Use Analysis Stu~ and A~dendum
(Under Separate Cover to Com~isSioners)
ResoluCian of Denial
/
I c,v,c c,..T,'. /
C COMMERCIAL
HAVEN OVERLAY
DISTRICT
INDUSTRIAL PARK
GENERALINDUSTRIA
I
~--'- ~ MINIMUM IMPACT
HEAVYINDUSTRIAL
CITY OF TrrLE: l~l~ l,Oe.~aeEk-~l' N =
!/~,=!;, ,' nxsmrr: A SCAL~: k,-
To: Dan Coleman, Beverly Luttrell
Planning Division, City of Rancho Cucamonga
From: Jack Masi, Michael Scandiffio
Masi Commerce Center Partners
Date: November 22, 1993
Re: Masi Plaza - General Plan Amendments
Dear Mr. Coleman and Ms. Luttrell:
We request that our application, dated November 9, 1993, requesting
an amendment to the Industrial Specific Plan be converted into an
application for ~he following General Plan Amendments:
1) Rezone to "General Commercial" Parcels 1, 2 and 3 of
Parcel Map 4485, per plat recorded in Book 40, at Pages
65 and 66, of Parcel Maps, and Lot 17 of the Map of
Rochester, per plat recorded in Book 9, at Page 20, of
Maps, Official Records of San Bernardino County,
California. . ~ · ,
ancillary pet supply sales and pet grooming facilities
wi~h ancillary pet supply sales.
~AmendtheGeneral Plan so as to allow in Subarea 7 of the
Industrial Specific Plan a "retail allowance" for mixed-
use projects that have recreation and/or entertainment
components, restaurants and other service oriented
commercial uses and meet other specific criteria. Our
proposal for a special "retail allowance" category to
Subarea 7 of the Industrial Specific Plan is attached.
activities under the "Automotive Service Court"
definition:
- ~ransmission service and replacement
- general automobile repair
- car rentals
If you have any questions or nee~ further information, please call
Michael Scandiffio at (818) 846-2070.
Sincerely,
Masi Commerce Center Partners - Amendments to the General Plan
November 22, 1993
Page 2
S~N~RAL PLAt[ aMXNDM~NTS
PROPOSwD AMENDMENTS TO SUBAI~A 70P TEl INDUSTRIAL 8PICIFIC
2) Specialty Retail:
Specialty retail stores specializing in the sale of one
or more of the following: housewares, appliances,
electronics, home furnishings & accessories, plants &
garden supplies, auto parts & accessories, keys & locks,
sewing supplies, health & beauty supplies, apparel,
footwear & related accessories, cards & gifts, variety
stores and other related specialty retail items. Maximum
size of any single user limited to 25,000 square feet.
Establish~na Amount and v__~c_ation of Permit~sa_ Retail
1 ) Amount Permitted:
gr above permissible retail use categories
shall not exceed the lesser of either a) an amount equal
to 35% of the total planned square footage for the
project or b) 85,000 square feet.
2) Permissible Locations:
Permissible retail uses will be allowed only in specified
building locations. Designated retail building
locations must be compatible with adjacent non-retail
uses. However, up to 15% of allowable retail uses may
be permitted in non-designated locations if such
locations are compatible with adjacent uses (as
determined b~ the City Planner).
Auulication and Protect Desianation for "SMcial Retail Allowance
1) Application:
The "special retail allowance, shall be 9Tented only as part
of an application for a Conditional Use Permit, or amended
Conditions1 Use Permit, for 8 master planned development.
2) Project Designation:
As part of the Conditional Use Permit, the Planning Commission
may grant an eligible Project a eretail allowance- for the
above permitted retail use categories, specifying the total
amount of such allowance that is permissible end the building
locations where at least 85% of this retail allowance must
octtit.
Masi Commerce Center Partners - Amendments to the General Plan
November 22, 1993
GBNBRAL ~LAN Mi~NDMBleTS
PROPOSED/~W~ND~ENTS TO BUBARF~ 7 OF THB ZNDUBTRZ/~ 8~BCIFIO ~L~N
"Special Retail Xllowancs for aiRed-Use Projects with Recreation
sad/or Entertainment Components, RestatLrants and Other service
Oriented Commercial Uses."
The project must meet the following criteria:
1) Must be at least 20 acres in size;
2) Must be located along Foothill Boulevard and have a
frontage of at least 1,000 feet;
3) Must be located at the intersection of Foothill Boulevard
and a major arterial;
4) Must contain a desi~nated wactivity centers;
5) Must be in reasonable proximity to City-owned
recreational facilities or perks and have natural links
to such facilities;
6) Must have a si~nificant level of building area
designated for recreation and/or entertainment uses,
restaurants and other service oriented commercial uses;
7) Must not be part of a lar~ermaster planned project that
is predominantly office, professional or industrial in
character; and,
7) Must have on-sits pedestrian nmenities, such as plazas
and landscaped walkways, and have an overall design
conducive to pedestrian use.
Permitted Retail Use Catsaeries
The following retail use categories may be permitted for eligible
projectsz
1) Recreation & Entertainment Related Retail:
This category includes the sale of sportin9 9sods,
sportswear & accessories, western wear, hobby supplies,
arts, crafts, photo & music supplies & services, coins
& stamps, toys, pets & pit supplies, art & antiques,
sports collsctibles & trophies, books & ma~azines and
video/record/tape/CDrantals & sales. Maximum size of
any single user limited to approx. 40,000 square feet.
SUBAREA 7
Land Use Designation Zndustrta] Park
Prteary Function Subarea 7 occupies an area dtrectly south of Foothill
Boulevard which represents an important land use edge
between the C1 ty' s % ndustrt al Area and coltaunt ty
oriented non-industrial area and is a gateway to the
City. A major industrial, office, and comercial
development on approximately 300 acres is currently
undergoing phased construction, liltbin this area is a
planned CIvtc Center whtch will tnclucle San 8ernardtno
County and City off(ces.
remitted Uses Custom Panufacturtng
Light 14anufacturtng
Administrative and Office
Profess~ohal/Oestgn Servtces
Research Services
Light liholesale, Storage, Olstrtl;)utton
But1 dtng 14atntonance Services
Business Supply Retail Sales and Services
Buslness $Wport $ervtces
Cemmntcatlon Servtces
Eating and Drtnktng Establishments
Flnandal, Insurance and Real Estate Servtces
Hotol/Notel
AclEtntstrattve Ctvtc Servtces
F1 ood Control/Uti 11 ty Corrtdor
Contit tt one1 Uses Autmott ve Rental/Less1 ng
Autolot1 ve $al es
Autmmttve $ervtce Starton
Convenience Sales and Servtces
EnterUt merit
Flit FoOd S~1 es
roo~ and Beverage Sales
Nedtcal/Hell th Care $erdces
Personal Services
Recreatt on FIct 1 t tl es
Ca1 turn1
Pub1 tc Asseai)ly
Public Safety and Utility hrvtces
Re1 tflous Asiaely "
Business
Oaly and not see a re
At the dawn d last ~ear'. sererid C Retail % All tax·Me ules
in a tend tenacted earn, ,~,d,- quarter. Ha·be Web S~ete~the~". try lee~ lm dante 1992 1993
wearF Cditom~ noel Idarid Vdle anonrot it we mn~l~l~ ~ Chin· 88.039 91.185,3.6 121.921 124.780,2.3
actordine to · new ,tufa repe~ in Poenone ~ Ibac~ Cucamonla Claremoat 43 220 39 562 -8.5 48.043 43.875 -.
!nararereveraalerfeftunea
cash teebran. taulde sales tee·iF
the !~ vail· cities dipped ~.6 pe The closure ~ month ot Norten !FontaM 123733 116200 -60 187 179 163209 -12.8
'.n,,58;a79+,,.3
yeew.~Mb~ bettom er the trench 1 I 1
9eatbern Celifomia'· thqeftnl rece- jeb, I
lion, when thoulands d~ - and i , "The third- and fourth~luarter (ales
"The Nosed haJ[ wor~ lids,; the nabj0t fo/Iowed by a atl/d~ litcrease · aid.
firIt hdf d lm~tlrttbl~~ ~ hit In "lit ~ Pleclatwtl~ in Rancho Cuca!~on~a pelted the heal-
e~__~qmi¥ Jdm }lud.l.mq,,-r.
-_ Pacer's
$ earnings
· "'/~'0/
__
RXSOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THX PLANNING COMMISSION OF THX CITY OF
RANClIO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMXNDING DENIAL OF THE
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 93-02B, REQUESTING TO AMEND THE
GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP FROM INDUSTRIAL PARK TO GENERAL
COMMERCIAL FOR 15 ACRES OF LAND EXTENDING ALONG FOOTHILL
BOULEVARD TO A pARALLEL LINE APPROXIMATELY 520 FEET
SOUTH, WITHIN THE MASI PLAZA DEVELOPMENT, LOCATED AT THE
SOUTHWEST CORNER OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND ROCHESTER
AVENUE, RANCliO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AND MAKING FINDINGS
IN SUPPORT THXREOF - APNt 229-011-10, 19, 20, 21, and 26
threugh 28
(l) Masi Partners has filed ·n application for General Plan
~ndment No. 93-02B ·s described in the title of this Resolutien.
Herein·fret in this Resolution, the subject General Plan l~nendment is referred
to ·s 'the application.e
(li) On February 9, 1994, the Planning C~salllion of the City of
Rancho Cuc~ng· conducted · duly neticed public hearing on the application.
(ill) All legal prerequisites prier to the adol~cien of this Resolution
have occurred.
B. ~
NOW, T~REFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the
Planning C~mission of the city of Rancho cucamonga as followst
1. This ~ ...... ~sslen hereby specifically finds then ·11 of the fac~s
set forth in the Recitals, Per~ A, ef ~his Resolution are true end carreck.
2. Based ulxm substantial evidence presented to this ~-~miesion
during =he ~ve-referenced public hearin~ on February 9, 1994, including
written end oral staff reports, tnge=her wl~h public ~est~ony, this
C~mmission hereby specifically finds as follower
(·) The ·pplic·tien applies te ·pprox4mmtely 14 acres of lend,
at the southwest corner of Fou=hlll Boulevard and Rochester Avenue with ·
frontage of approxiatately 1,250 fee~ along Foothill Boulevard and · depth of
approximately 520 feet and is presently vacant excep~ far the Maei Winery
currently being used as the Vlc~ery chapel and leasing el·ice. .said proper~y
.is currently designe~ed ·s Sub·re· 7 (Industrial Park) of the Industrial Are·
Specific Plan~ end
(b) The pEoNer~y to the north of ~be sub~ec~ sl~e Is designated
as Medium Residenteel (8-14 dwelling units per acre) and is vacant. The
preper~y to the wast is design·ted lndus~ri·l Park end is vacant. The
proper~:y to ~be east Is designs~ed Indus~rial Park and is developed wi~h the
PLANNING COMMISSI(,,- RESOLUTION NO.
GPA 93-02B - MASI PARTNERS
Fahruary 9, 1994
P·ge 2
Aggazzoti Wlnez7. The property to the south is designated Industrial Park ·nd
is developed with the Spor~s Complex; and
(c) The application applies to properties located within
Subare· 7 of the Industrial Area Specific Plans ·nd
(d) The General Plan designates the ·re· south of Foothill
Boulevard between Deer and Day Creeks as par= of the Industri·l Area specific
Plan; and
(e) The purpose of the Industrl·l Area Specific Plan is to
provide a broad range of primarily industrial and business suppor~c activities;
and
( f ) The intent of the ' Industrl·l P·rk' designation is to
reserve land for light industrial uses, office and administr·tion facilities,
research and development laboratories, suppor~ businesses, and camnercial
service uses; and
(g) The applicant's request would add the full range of Genez·l
Cc~ercial uses to the list of uses ·lread~ permitted in Subare· 7, Industrial
Park; and
(h) The trade area and land use analysis did nc~ conclusively
find the need for m~re gener·l cmrcial. According to the General Plan,
there are currently 819 ·cres of vacant land designated for · wide variety of
cmrcial uses. There exists approximately 300 ·cres of General Ccemerclal
zoned land within 5,000 fee~ of the proJec~ site. The creation of ·dditional
land zoned for such uses would adversely impact the existing and ·lre·dy
planned retail areas along Foothill Boulevard; and
(l) Foothill Boulevard between Day and Deer Creeks is an
impor~ant land use edge b~cween the city's Industrial Area end c~munity
oriented non-industrial areas to the north; and
(J) The intent of Subarea 7 is to function as · transitional
area betw~ea the General Industrial areas to the south and the
Cuemartial/Retail end Residential areas to the north of F~thlll Boulevard;
and
{k) This amendment d~es conflict with the Land Use Policies of
the General Plea end will not provide for development within the district in ·
manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development; and
(1) Thl~ maendment does no~ proacts the g~als and objectives of
the Land Use Slant; and
(m) This maendmen~ w~uld n~c be materially injurious or
detrimental to the adjacent properties and w~uld not have a significant impact
on the environment nor the surrounding properties.
PLANNING COMMISSI~.. ~SOLUTION NO.
GPA 93-02B - MASI PARTNERS
February 9, 1994
3. B·sed upon =he substantial evidence presented to this Commission
during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of
f·c~l set forth in paragr·phs I and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and
concludes as follower
(a) Th·t the subject property is not suitable for the uses
permitted in the proposed district in terms of ·ccess, size, and compatibility
with existing lend use in the surrounding eras; and
(b) Th·t the proposed amendment would not have signific·nt
lmpac~cs on the environment nor the surrounding properties; and
(c) Th·t the proposed amendment is n~c in conformance with the
General Plan.
4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed
Nag·tire Decl·r·tion, together with all written and or·l reports included for
the environmental ·ssessment for the ·pplication, the Planning C~'--~lssion
finds th·t there is no substantl·l evidence that the proJec~c will have ·
significant effec~ upon the environment and adol~s · Negative Declaration
based upon the findings as follows=
(a) That the Negative Declaration has been prepared in
ccepliance with the California Invironmental ~uality &c~ of 1970, as ~mended,
and the State C~4A guidelines proemlasted thereunder; that maid Negative
Declar·tion and the Initial Study prepared thermfo~e reflec~ the independent
jud~nent of the Planning cuemission; and, further, this cc~nission has
reviewed and considered the information contained in said Negative Declaration
with regard to the application.
(b) That, based upon the changes and alterations which have
been incorporated into the proposed project, no significant ·dverse
environmental effects will occur.
(c) Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14
of the California Cede of Regulations, the Planning ~--~lssion finds as
followe= In considerin~ the record as a whole, the Initial Stud~ and Negative
Declaration f~z the project, there is no evidence that the proposed project
will have pc~ential for an ·dyetee impac~ upon wildlife resources or the
habitat upem which wildlife depends. Further, based upon substantial evidence
contained l~ the Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the
information p~vided t~ the Planning ~selon during the public hearing, the
Planning ~lssinn hereby rebuts the presuml~lon of ·dyetee effec~c as set
forth in Sertlon 753.~(c-l-d) of Title 14 of the California C~de of
Regulations.
~. Based upon the findings and conclusinns set forth in
paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Cce~lssio~ hereby recmnde denial of
General Plan/%mendsent No. 93-02B.
PLANNING COMMISSIOn. RESOLUTION NO.
GPA 93-02B - MASI pARTNERS
F~bruary 9, 1994
Page 4
6. The Secretary to this teemission shall certify to the adol~cion
of this Resolution.
DENIED THIS 9TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 1994.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF ~Hz CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BYs
g. David Bather, Chairman
ATTESTs
Brad Bullet, Secretary
I, Brad Bullet, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
cuclmonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly end
re~a!azly introduced, palled, and adolYced by the Plmming ~-~-ission of the
City of Rancho Cucem~nga, at a regular meeting of the Pllnnin~ ~--lssion held
on the 9th day of F'hrUL'7 1994, by the followin9 v~ce-to-wits
NOBSs COMMIBSIONERSz
ABSENTs CG!~XBBXONERSs
Mr. Deeb said there would not.
Chairman Barker ·gain closed the public hearing.
Motion: ~ved by McNlel, seconded by Melcher, to adopt the resolution
approving Conditional Use Permit 94-01 with limitations on the d~splay space
for distilled spirits as indicated in the staff report and to require a view-
obscuring film on the window by the storage are·. Motion carried by the
following vote:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BARKER, LUMPP, MCNIEL, MELCNER, TOLSTOY
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE -carried
The Planning Commission recessed from 9:19 p.m. to 9:24 p.m. ~tssloner
McNiel left during the recess.
C. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENER~tL pLAN AMENDMENT 93-02B - M~aI A
request to amend the land use designation from Industrial Perk to General
c~.~arci·l for 15 acres of lend extending along Foothill Boulevard to a
parallel line approximately 520 feet south, within the Masi Plaza
developsent, located at the southwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and
Rochester Avenue - APN: 229-011-10, 19, 21, and 26 through 28. Staff
recmnds issuance of · Negative Declaration. Related File
Conditional Use Permit 91-24.
Bred Buller, City Planner, presented the staff repor~c and a revised sheet
outlining alternative lend uses prepared foliowAng discussions between staff
and the applicant. He noted that the applicant had requested a new General
Plan land use categor~ of Recreational Coe~ercial and several amendments to
the Industrial Area Specific Plan to allow General Cc~mercial on the entire
27-acre site because of the proximity to the Rancho Cocemonga Adult Spor~s
Park and Stadium. Be said that staf~ supported the request and had re-
advertised the matter for the Februax7 23, 1994, mting.
~issioner Melcher asked if · staff report would be prepared with recmnd
changes to the text.
Mr. Bullet responded it was staff's intention to provide the rec~..ended
changes with the agenda packet distributed in advance of the meeting.
Chaizlnan Barker opened the public he·ring.
Willie Claire, claire Associates, 6 Via La Cima, Rancho Palos Verdes, stated
he had prepared the Trade Area and Land Use Analysis.
Commissioner Melcher observed that the applicant was requeetin~ that 85,000
square feet of general cmrcial be permitted. Be noted that Mr. Claire's
Planning C~£ssion Minutes -8- February 9, 1994
· xecutive Bus~a~r~ indicated that all but 40,000 square feet of gross leasable
tree has been signed up by the developer. He asked if the 40,000 square foot
fiquro refers to the project. as present-ll, permit. ted or with the proposed
changes.
Nr. Claire said it was his underst-ending t-hat- t-he re~sining 40,000 squtre fttt
refers t-o what it already approved or before t-he City for considerat-ion.
~r. Bullet stat-ed t-ho applicant- has requeet-ad t-hat- an additional 35 percent- of
the project'a square footage be permil'.ted t-o have General Canmartial uses.
Commissioner Tolst-oy asked if t-hat- meant that- more than 85,000 square feet
could be c~,~arcial.
Mr. Bullet said the 85,000 square feet- would be in addition t-o t-he ccemercial
amount- already permitted or condit-ionally permitted under current zoning.
Co~missioner Halchar did not- understand why t-here was a need to approve more
commrcial uses when only 40,000 square feet is left for leasing.
Mr. Bullet replied the applicant has indicated they need the additional uses.
Ccanisaloner )(elcher noted that when the auto court use was approved, the
applicant had assured the Coonlesion that it was a viable use as approved but
now t-he applicant was stating that the auto couz~c would net kmrk unless
transmission repair and engine rebuilding could be added as uses. He observed
that the Cc~aissionera had specifically opposed transmission and engine repair
and other repairs typically performed under &urGesrive/Truck Repair - Major.
He felt such uses are heavier than appropriate for this location.
Mr. Bullet stated he had provided copies of the previous staff report and
minutes and C~-mtseloner Melchet was cottec~ that the applicant had indicated
that use wee not necessary at the time but the applicant haw now stated they
are losing potential tenants because of the restriction against such uses. Be
reported that was eft amendment that would be advertised for February 23. He
said sta~ had analyzed the auto service cou~c built on Archibald &venus which
allows a full range o~ automotive repair services and ataf~ felt that such
uses would not necessarily create a negative impact with the range of land
uses in the area if properly designed.
~mtesionez Tolstoy asked l~ that meant there would not be a gas station at
the IotaelBa.
Mr. Bullet replied that one of the conditions of the auto COUL~C approval was
that the gas station has to be constructed before the other uses and the
applicant had no~ indicated a desire t-o delete the station.
~lseloner Lumpp felt it would be helpful to have the applicant provide an
hnalysls of the entire site in terms of uses which are already omitted and
how that relates to the additional 35 percent gross leasable area.
Mr. Claire stated he ~ld provide a full status update for the February 23
meeting.
Planning C~_~lsion Minutee -9- February 9, 1994
Commissioner Lumpp requested that the update be provided to staff as soon as
possible for staff's analysis.
Chairman Barker agreed it needs to be provided prior to February 23. He
commented that the project seems to vacillate constantly and not get built.
He thought that was unfortunate as the project has a fantastic location.
Mr. Claire said he would try to have the information to staff by the middle Of
the week of February 14.
Mr. Bullet rec~nded that the matter be tabled and re-advertised as
described.
commissioner Tolstoy asked why the Commission should not act on General Plan
Amendment 93-02B.
Ralph Hanson, Deputy City Attorney, stated that the applicant has now amended
their application so that the matter must be re-advertised.
Chairman Barker asked if the applicant would prefer that the Cuemission vote
to deny the present application.
Mr. Claire requested that the matter be continued.
Mr. Bullet stated that staff would prefer that the matter be tabled end
re-advertised as described tonight with the consent of the applicant.
Chairman Barker closed the public hearing.
C~swsissioner Tolstoy asked if that meant Recreational Commercial would be
reco~ssnded as a new lend use category for all of Sub·tea 7 of the Industrial
Area Specific Plan.
Mr. Bullet explained that Recreational Ccemercial would be a new category In
the General Plan end therefore other landowners may request that designation
on their property. He said that it would not be restricted to Just Sub·re· 7,
however, the intent of this application is for this property only.
Motionz Moved by Molcher that the ~lssion determine that the matter as
advez~cised does no~ reflec~ the application end therefore consideration should
be tabled and the matter be re-advertised for February 23, 1994, with the
concurrence of the applicant.
Ccsmnissioner T~lstc.f stated he had concerns about diluting the already
established re, all ccemunity and designated areas. Me said he could perhaps
supper~ Recreational ccemercial as · new designation but he did not feel
elec~cronics, furniture, and appliances should be included In such ·
designation because he did not feel they are Recreational Ccesner~l·l. He felt
Recreational Ccemercial could include such things 88 · golf pro shop, sporting
got·is, the·ire, e~o.
Planning commission Minutes -10- February 9, 1994
102
Ccesniaaloner Lumpp seconded Commissioner Nelcher's motion to table General
Plan Naendment 93-02B and re-advertise It for the February 23, 1994# meeting
at 5:00 p.m. Hation carried by the following vote:
AYRS~ CONNZSSIO!~RI: B3~KER, LUHPP, NCNIEL, HELCH~R# TOLSTOY
NOES: COMNISSIONER$: NONE
ABSENT: COHNZSSIONXRSs NONE -carried
Ccaxnissioner Melcher observed that in his 3-1/2 years of being on the
C~,,ission and in 16 years of dealing with the City he felt this was the most
flagrant case of the tail (the applicant) wagging the do~ (the Planning
C~-~ission) that he had ever seen and he was embarrassed by the process.
D. - A request to permit a health
square feet in Building 15 of previously approve
91-24, in the Industrial Park District (Subarea 7) the
~1 Area Specific Plan, located on 27 acres at the corner
of Boulevard and Rochester Avenue - XPN: 229-011-28.
Beverly Lusttell Associate Planner, noted that at the Planning
Cc~lsalon hearin~ ~e C'aeaiSSlOn had requested that
conditional Use for this same center be to 5:00 p.m. on
February 23, so that could analyze new submitted by the
applicant including floor plans. She said staff recommended
Conditional Use Permit xlso be continued to 23, 1994, so that a
floor plan and a thorough analysis could for staff review
and the Coeniasion could all four at that t~me.
Chairman Barker opened the public
lit. Claire consented to the
Hattonz Roved by Halchar, to continue 'Conditional Use
PeriLS 93-31 to 5x00 p.m. on 1994. Hation carried by the
following vote:
AYES, COMMISSIONERS, LUMPP, MELCH~R, TOLSTOY
NOES:
W.
Brad City Planner, indicated that the city Council staff
to aspects of the revisions to the Brown Ac~ reference
to Be said staff w~uld be researching the utter
the Council and would provide additional information to the -- salon
Planning c---~lssion Minutes -11- February 9, 1994
103
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF TRE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT
93-02B, pA~T A, AMENDING THE GENERAL PLAN TO ADD A NEW
LAND USE CATEGORY OF "RECREATIONAL COMRCIAL," AND
MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF.
A. Recitals ·
( i ) Masi Partners has filed an application for General Plan
Amendment No. 93-02B, part A, as described in the title of this Resolution.
Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject General Plan Amendment is referred
to as the "application."
(ii) On February 9 and 23, 1994, the Planning Commission of the City
of Rancho Cucamonga conducted duly noticed public hearings on the application
and, following the conclusion of said public hearings, adopted Resolution No.
94-08, thereby recozending to this City Council that said application be
approved.
( iii ) On March 16, 1994, the City Council of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and
concluded said hearing on that date.
(iv) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution
have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the
City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
I. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set
forth in the Recitals, Part "A," of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. This Council hereby finds and certifies that the project has
been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental
Quality Act of 1970, and further, this Council hereby issues a Negative
Declaration.
3. Based upon the Substantial evidence presented to this Council
during the above-referenced public hearing, including writtan and oral staff
reports, this Council hereby finds and concludes as follows:
a. That the subject property is suitable for the uses
hermitted in the proposed district in terms of access, size, and compatibility
with existing land use in the surrounding areas; and
b. That the pro[M)sed amendment would not have significant
adverse impacts on the environment and the surrounding properties~ and
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO.
GPA 93-02B, PART A - MASI
March 16, 1994
Page 2
c. That the proposed amendment is in conformance with the
General Plan.
d. The Rancho Cucamonga Adult Sports Park, located on the west
side of Rochester Avenue, south of Foothill Boulevard, was completed in 1993,
features year-round sports activities, including a minor league baseball
stadium with approximately 5,500 seats, and represents a significant
alteration of the land use characteristics of the immediate area; and
e. The intersection of Foothill Boulevard and Rochester Avenue
has been designated as an activity center to promote concentrated activity;
and
f. The application is consistent with the objectives of the
Rancho Cucamonga General Plan for the following reasons:
(1) The application contemplates regionally oriented uses
within one mile of the 1-15 Freeway and Foothill Boulevard interchange; and
(2) The application as proposed would create a land use
category which recognizes the importance of Foothill Boulevard as the City's
primary commercial corridor; and
(3) The application contemplates regionally oriented uses
along Foothill Boulevard, a major regional transportation corridor; and
(4) The application would create a Recreational Commercial
land use designation intended to promote recreation and retail uses
surrounding the Rancho Cucamonga Adult Sports Park; and
(5) The application would encourage future commercial
activities in planned, organized concentrations to promote non-motorized modes
of transportation.
4. The City Council of the City of Mancho Cucamonga hereby approves
General Plan Amendment 93-02B, Part A, to add the new land use category
"Recreational Commercial" (see EXhibit "A").
5. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
105
GENERAL pLA~ AMENDMENT 93-02B, PART A
RecreaU~onal Commercial= Developmen= of recree=lon feclli=ies and re,all uses
shell be encouraged along FOothill Boulevard surrounding =he Rancho Cucamonga
Adul~ Spor~cs Park near =he intersection of Rochester Avenue. The baseball
s=adium and year-round spor~s ac~lvities in the Spor~s Perk create · unique
oppor~:uni~y to provide secondary region-serving specialty retell uses that ere
no~ major general merchandise depar~men~ stores or food or drug stores. They
generally use epprox4'nately 3,500 - 55,000 square fee~ of gross leasable area
and require sites with high visibility end high traffic coun=a. These centers
t~picelly have convenient freeway access end draw their cue=~ners from winbin
a five to ten mile radius. Uses in this ca=egory ere regional in na=ure and
no~ normally found in neighborhood commercial centers. These ~ypee of
occupancies could include retailers such as spor=lng goods and sp~r~:lng
apparel.
EXHIBIT A
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APpROVING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT
93-02B, PA~ B, AMENDING THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP
FROM INDUSTRIAL PARK TO RECREATIONAL COMMERCIAL FOR 27
ACHES OF LAND, LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF
FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND ROCHESTER AVENUE, AND MAKING
FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 229-011-10, 19, 20,
21, AND 26 THROUGH 28.
A. Recitals.
(i) Masi Partners has filed an application for General Plan
Amendment No. 93-02B, Part B, as described in the title of this Resolution.
Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject General Plan Amendment is referred
to as the "application."
(ii) On February 9 and 23, 1994, the Planning Comission of the City
of Rancho Cucamonga conducted duly noticed public hearings on the application
and, following the conclusion of said public hearings, adopted Resolution No.
94-09, thereby recomending to this City Council that said applicatio~ be
approved.
(iii) On March 16, 1994, the City Council of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and
concluded said hearing on that date.
(iv) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution
have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the
City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set
forth in the Recitals, Part "A," of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. This Council hereby finds and certifies that the project has
been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental
Quality ACt of 1970, and further, this Council hereby issues a Negative
Declaration.
3- Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council
during the above-referenced public hearing, including written and oral staff
~eports, this Council hereby finds and concludes as follows:
a. That the subject property is suiteble for the uses
permitted in the proposed district in terms of access, size, and compatibility
with existing land use in the surrounding areas; and
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO.
GPA 93-02B, PART B - MASI
March 16, 1994
Page 2
b. That the proposed amendment would not have significant
adverse impacts on the environment and the surrounding properties; and
c. That the proposed amendment is in conformance with the
General Plan.
d. The application applies to approximately 27 acres of land,
at the southwest corner of FOOthill BOulevard and Rochester Avenue with a
frontage of approximately 1,250 feet along FOOthill Boulevard and a similar
depth and is presently vacant except for the Masi Winery currently being used
as the Victory Chapel and leasing office. Said property is currently
designated as SubarM 7 (Industrial Park) of the Industrial Area Specific
Plan; and
e. The application applies to properties which have been
approved for development of a mixed-use center including over 260,000 square
feet of industrial, office, recreation, automotive service, convenience sales
and services, and business support services through Conditional Use Permit
91-24; and
f. The property to the north of the subject site is designated
as mixed uses including Comercial, Office, and Residential and is vacant.
The property to the west is designated Industrial Park and is vacant. The
property to the east is designated Industrial Park and is developed with the
Aggazzoti Winery. The property to the south is designated Industrial Park and
is developed with the Pancho Cucamonga Adult Sports Park; and
g. The application applies to properties located within
Subare 7 of the Industrial Area Specific Plan; and
h. The subject properties adjoin the Rancho Cucamonga Adult
Sports Park, featuring year-round sports activities; and the Ranoho Cucamonga
Stadium, a minor leaque basehall stadium with approximately 5,500 seats, which
has significantly altered the land use characteristics of the i~nediate area;
and
i. Subsequent to the initial approval of the master plan for
development (i.e., Conditional Use Permit 91-24), the City designated the
interse~ion of FOOthill BOulevard and Rochester Avenue as an activity center
intended to promote concentrated activity; and
j. The application contemplates region serving and sub-region
serving retail uses allowed Under the General Coemercial regulations of the
City's Development Code; and
k. The City's General Plan gnals, policies, and objectives
relate to the application an follows:
(1) Region serving uses should surroUnd the 1-15 Freeway
and Foothill BOulevard interchange; and
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO.
GPA 93-02B, PART B - MASI
March 16, 1994
Page 3
(2) Foothill Boulevard is the primary co~unercial corridor;
and
(3) Foothill Boulevard is a major east-west transportation
corridor in the region; and
(4) Regionally oriented uses should be located in close
proximity to the regional transportation network; and
(5) Future co~unercial activities shall be organized into
planned, grouped concentrations to promote transit opportunities and
alternative modes of transportation.
4. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby approves
General Plan Amendment 93-02B, Part B, to designate 27 acres of land at the
southwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and Rochester Avenue as "Recreational
Comercial" (see Exhibit "A").
5. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
109
1. ~1 the 23rd day of Feb~m~y 1994, the Planning O-...d~icml of the
City of Ranclio ~w~nnga corauc~d a a,ly noticed public N~ir~ with respect
the ccnclusicn of said public b~ing, the Phnnir~ CCA~uiSSiCm
Resoluticml No. 94-10, thereby mx~!ending that the City Council
Industrial Specific Plan Amerament 94-02.
2. C~1 Maid, 16, 1994, the City Council of the City of Rancho
c~,~lcla corrhac~a a duly rrfciced public b~ing and oa-~l,~a said
prier to its ~amption of this Ordinance.
3. All legal prere~,i-~ites prior to the ~3t~icel of this Ordinance
B. Ordinance.
The City Council of the City of Rand~ n~3a hereby ~dains as
follows:
SEu,'-(~ 1: Ibis Oouncil hereby specifies and finds that all of the
facts set forth in the Recitals, Pert A, of t_his Ord/nance are true and
ccrrect.
SEurlON 2: This Council hereby finds and certifies that the ~'oject
Envix~mental Quality A~t of 1970, and further, this Council hereby is~ a
Negative Declarati~l.
~mUA'IC~ 3: ~le Ran~ho Cucamonga City Council finds and celc],~ as
follows:
a. ~ s~bj~t ~ty is ~itable for the u~s pe~it~ed in
the ~xBed Hi~t~ict in terms of access, size, and ~a~{hility with
b. T~a ~u~used d~%nge w~/ld not have significant adverse
Plan; and
111 '
Ordinanc~ No. 521
mge2
d. ~he amerament does n~t c~nflict with the Lar~ Use Policies
of the Gerk~l Plan and will p~u~ide fur develc4a~lt within the a~crict in a
e. ~he ~i~.~ed amendment is cunsistent with the objectives of
the Industrial Area S'~ecific Plan, and the purposes of the d/strict in which
f. The ~uused amendme/It is in ~liance with each of the
applicable p~u~v-isic~s of the ~ial Area Specific Plan; and
public health, safety, cr welfare cr materially injurious to ~__~ties c~
h. ~he ~ed areenfant will not be detrimental to the
objectives of the General Plan ur the Industr~a~ Area S~ecific Plan.
SEur~C~ 4: ~he City Council of the City of Ranc~o Ow~r/a hereby
a~xu~es ~ial Area Specific Pla~ A~rr]~rer~ No. 94-02, chaalgir~ the
Table III-2 as attached.
SEC~C~ 5: ~e City Clerk shall certify to the --h~ci.m of this
Ordinance and shall cause the ~-~ to be published within fif~-~n (15) data
after its passage at least c~ce in ~he Inland Valley Daily ~,]~n, a
newspaper of genoa ciro,~tic~ publ~a in the City of Ran~ho ~"r3a,
Ordinanc~ No. 521
Page3
Primary Function: Subarea 7 occupies an area directly south of Foothill
Boulevard ~ahi~h L~ants an ~-'.~tant land use ~ between the City's
Industrial Area and a ~ m~ter p~ o ..... ~ity to the ncrth. Foothill
Boulevard is the City's primary c,; ...~.',-c'ial ccrrin~ and ser~es as a ~teay to
the City. Alcr~ Foothill Boulevard, the intersecticr~ at HaM, Millikan, and
Rcc~e~tar Avem~ have been n~ignat~a as activity centers to ~ ..... ~e
cor~entra~a activity and establish a unique nl~=ign
Special Cccsideratic~ Foothill Boulevard Lea major arter{a~ w~lich is
~ujec~a to carry a significant vol, m~ of traffic. In u~,~r to
vehicu/ar access problems, the miD~ parcel size ~nt alcrr/Foothill
Boulevard is 2 acres and min~ parcel width is 200 feet.
For ~perty within the bluv~ies of the HaM Avemae Overlay District, refer
to the Overlay District fur a modified list of pe~mit~a~ land uses and s~ecial
development criteria.
The San Bernardino County Law and Justice Center n~r the ~x~r of Foothill
Boulevard and Haven Avenue may include a detenticel facility if mulicipal court
facilities are provided.
On the ~t side of Haven Avenue north of A~w Highway, Devel~.~.~t Oode
~u~dsic~s for the Ceneral C~.,~rcial District shall apply to K Mart ax~ the
adjoining northearly b/ilding. Devel~.~nt and use of satellite halb in
the K Mart Center are subject to ~uvisic~s of the Industial Area ~Spec~_ific
Plan.
At the southwest oorner of Foothill Bcu/evard and Rochester Avenue, adjoinir~
recreation/sporting goods and apparel retail uses shall be permit~a within
the planned 27-acre mixed use cen~r.
shall be given to the quality of site a~ign, a~dHt~ure, and lara~ing of
all ~'u~_rties adjacer~ to the 1-15 Freeway. Attractive screening of
significant freeway points of vie shall be rec~fi~ed.
113
Ord~ No. 521
Page4
~Rr,m. III-2
LAND USE TYPE D~',tAMATACNR
tram~i~ions; inst'~!laticn of air c~litioning, car ~xxms, sterece,
Auto Courts shall ~a~ly with the foll~ng a~ign criteria:
- Max/xm]m Size: 4 acres.
-- Maxixmam frontage along a major or ~n~a~y arterial street:
300 feet.
- No access to the site will be peA,~Mt~a almectly off any major
and secora~y arterials thr~ a c~binatic~ of k~rms,
- An ~riate combination of betins, landscaping, and
perimeter of the site to miDimlze the impact of the auto court
~uhibit~a.
- All signage shall be lirairma to signs a~xuved urr]er a Unifu~m
Sign PA~.
114
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT .'
DATE: April 6, 1994
TO: Mayof and Hembers of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: Will Jam J. O'Neil, City Engineer
BY: Paul A. Rougeau, Traffic Engineer
SUBJECT: DEVELOPHENT CODE AHENDMENT 94-01 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCN~ONGA -
CONSIDEP~ATION OF AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE DEVELOPMENT CODE TO
IMPLEMENT TP~ANSPORTATION CONTROL MEASURES ~tANDATED BY STATE AND
FEDEP~AL AIR QUALITY REGULATIONS.
INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 94-01 - CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAI~ONC~A CONSIDERATION OF AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE
~ AREA SPECIFIC PLAN TO IMPLEMENT TRANSPORTATION
CONTROL MEASURES )tANDATED BY STATE AND FEDERAL AIR QUALITY
REGULATIONS.
RECOWqENDAT I ON:
It is recomnended the City Council approve the the proposed ordinances.
BACKGROUND:
The South Coast Air Basin, which includes Rancho Cucamonga, has the worst
air quality in the nation. More than half of the smog in the basin comes
from motor vehicles. Both the 1992 Air Quality Management Plan and the
1992 Federal Attainment Plan for carbon monoxide include transportation
control measures (TCM) for implementation by local governments through
adoption of a trip reduction ordinance. The 1992 Congestion Management
Program (CliP) for San Bernardtno County also contains a trip reduction and
travel demand management element and sets forth a county wide strategy for
meeting mobil lty goal s and air qual lty requirements.
The County wide strategy involves uniform implementation of a series of
minimum trip reduction measures for new development projects by all
f 1 cit~ at a co~ettt~
af ected cities so as to avoid p acin9 one
disadvantage wl~J~ another.
Rancho Cucamonga was involved in a Joint city/county effortsled by San
Bernardtno Associated Governments (SANBAG) to develop a subregional program
to improve air quality by reducing vehicle trips. tncho Cucamonga must
adopt a trip reduction ordinance, or he subject to South Coast Air Quality
Management District (AQMO) regulations. The City Council recognized this,
and on June 16, 1993 approved resolution 93-126 confnitting the City to
115
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
APRIL 6, 1994
Page 2
adopt a local TCM Implementation Program. The proposed ordinances will
provide a trip reduction strategy suited to the Clty's needs, while
avoiding further regulation by the AQMD. They will also implement the
provisions of the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Air Quality element.
These measures are being adopted by all the Cities and the County within
the SANBAG subregional area. This will prevent any agency from taking an
unfair advantage over the other agencies by not adopting these regulations.
ANALYSIS:
If adopted, these ordinances would amend the Developrent Code and the
Industrial Area Specific Plan, establishing TCM's as conditions of approval
for new large residential, conmnerctal and industrial development projects
exceeding proposed thresholds. These measures will mitigate air quality
impacts created by the projects as follows:
1. Conmeer;clal and industrial projects shall provide showers for cycltsts
and walkers and provide preferential parking to accommodate bicyclist
and carpool/vanpool vehicles. In addition, on-site video conference
'facilities shall be provided for office developments with more than
1000 employees.
2. Mu1 ti family projects with 10 or more units shall provide preferential
parking to accommodate btcyclist and carpool/vanpool vehicles.
3. Residential projects with 500 or more units will provide a
tel ecoa~uttng center or contribute towards the development of one.
Other minor measures, most of which are already in the Development Code,
are included as listed on attachment "A".
The proposed ordinances retain the flextbtl ltY provided within the
Development Code for determining whether its provisions are being
reasonably and fairly applied. All or part of the TCM's may need to be
modified if implementation is tnfeasible, lneffectlve or redundant and
alternative measures considered. When implemented, such alternative TCM's
would reduce an equal amount of vehicle trips.
The trip reduction measures will be integrated into the existing
devel opeent revlew process and additional review board or process will be
created as a result of this amendment. The ordinances may need to be
amended or superseded from time to time, in order to meet congestion and
air qualtty goals as experience is gatned through tmpleeentetton of trtp
reduction and transportation demand management measures.
CONCLUSION:
Adoption of a trip reduction ordinance is necessary to conform to Federal,
State and local air. quality mandates. Failure to adopt a trip reduction
ordinance will result in the following:
116
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
APRIL 6, 1994
Page 3
I. Loss of State Gas Tax. If an ordinance is not adopted, the City may
lose subvention funds from the State Gas Tax. These funds are used 5y
the City for street maintenance, including the power for traffic
signals and street qights.
2. Loss of local control. The AQND is direc~y responsible to the
Environmental Protection Agency to impose Federal sanctions if Federal
attainment standards are not met by the South coast Air Basin. The
AQMD has indicated it would further regulate existing businesses if
Cities do not enact their own trip reduction regulations. Such
regulations wou1 d be mandatory and Include requirements for paid
parking 1 ots and additional gasol Ine taxes. These additional
regulations would be more onerous and impact the local economy more
than the kinds of actions contained in the proposed ordinances. The
ordinances includes actions that will enable trip reduction to occur
without direct regulation to businesses. Through project design and
new facilities which allow people to walk, bicycle and use transit
instead of cars, federal and state mandates to improve air quality can
be met.
ENVIRON14ENTAL ASSESSMENT:
The proposed ordinances would establish procedures to help improve air
quality, and therefore the action is categorically exempt from
environmental review provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act
(CEQA) per Section 15308 of the CEQA Guidelines.
Respectfully~~/~
William J. O'Neil
City Engineer
WJO:PAR:ly
Attachments: Core Actions
P1 arming Commission Staff Rport
Planning Co~m~ission Minutes
Ordinance (2)
117
Attact~nent A
CORE ACTIONS
D!~CRII~fXON:
Corn actions need to be adopted by all jurisdictions in the South Coast Ah' Basin, i.e. the Valley and
Mou~tsin portions of San 2ernardino County. The cot~ program consists predominantly of d~sign standards
for new development. Application of these measures to existing development my be considerut at the
regional level for c~rrnin actions, such ~ tg~qtliri~ the in~llstion of bicycle parking facilities.
ACTION CORE ACTIONS STANDARD LEV~- OF
CATF_.C~RY IMPt -I~ff~ITATION
De~!i:~alxh!~ 1. Ra/ui~bi~ycbpark~fa~ilimua Newnm-maidamialandmlti-family(ofl0ormor~
peP---,~_-q of ?-'., parking qmcm m unim) d~vek.~.mt or remodel ~a4mn disculinary
for DtNelolxnnX n~w non-tmdmial d~velopmmst or mvmw is ta~mmd.
imki~agspa~a~hammimumofa~m-~lmmck.
2. Pmvid~ maim pakaum ~k~ays N~w nm-tmidemial and multi-~,a'y (of 10 or motu
baikl~ia.k..d~vslopmeattopu!~
m~s.
bi:ycling or ~.n~_. to work. thudraMs (2S0 or morn pink hour
Minianna of om sbow~ fa~ili~ ~ceamble to both
S. RNui~ pumang~ kinking m m l~w ~ and muiti-~a--i~y (of 10 or
Ior. miom ckme m ~,~k,_, emruncM ,--~) do~,elogmonz w~h ~ brat 100 peridn
--d oom, mUinfoffero wi~h vebicb Lmdi~Anaa mpaivai~toaminimum of 5
bQUdjnlmalnce~.AaqJptqitlMN, mlm~100qlm:oa~a--lsimnmofon~.
d,, 9'.
L Pm~b ~,,,~. unl~ov~meau nmb u All now remdemmJ and nm-~Mkk~maJ clevelopm~t
mbmmam~
IS. Pmvidsom-~vidm~mfunsml Oflk~parkdswi~mmmforl000+emph~/~L
1
118
ACTION CORE ACTIONS STANDARD T.~/m. OF
CATEGORY IMPLEMENTATION
17. Roduce park~g space reqmremenu to New mm-re~knfi~ development ]inlet4 t~ other
N~W FEjZj~ 6. Develop bi~yck rou2 sya2m To be dmt2tmined based ~m c~ bicycl~ plan
comafont with $CAG's ReZ~ud to be telmind in Aupst 1993.
Mobility Element.
2
119
CITY OF RANCHO CUCA},IONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: March 9, 1994
TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Con~nission
FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
BY: Paul A. Rougeau, Traffic Engineer
SUBJECT: DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT 94-01 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA -
CONSIDERATION OF AN ENVIRONIqENTAL ASSESSMENT AND ORDINANCE
AMENDING THE DEVELOPMENT CODE TO IMPLEMENT TRANSPORTATION
CONTROL MEASURES MANDATED BY STATE AND FEDERAL AIR QUALITY
REGULATIONS.
INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 94-01 - CITY OF RANCNO
CUCAMONGA - CONSIDERATION OF AN EN¥IROI~ENTAL ~SES~/~ENT AND
01t]TEIqXIq/~ ANENDING THE INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN TO
IMPLEMENT TRANSPORTATION CONTROL MEASURES NANDATED BY STATE AND
FEDERAL AIR QUALITY REGULATIONS.
RECORqENDATION:
It is recomended the Plannlng Con~tsston review and comnent on the
proposed ordinances and forward them to the City Council for further
consideration.
BACKGROUNO:
The South Coast Air Basin, which includes Rancho Cucamonga, has the worst
air quality in the nation. Hore than half of the smog in the basin comes.
from motor vehicles. Both the 1992 Air Quality Nanagement Plan and the
1992 Federal Attainment Plan for carbon monoxide include transportation
control measures (TCM) for implementation by local governments through
adoption of a trip reduction ordinance. The 1992 Congestion ~nagemont
Program (CMP) for San Bernardino County also contains a trip reduction and
travel demand management element and sets forth a county wide strategy for
meeting mobility goals and air quality requirements.
The County wide strategy involves untfom imphmentatton of a series of
minimum trip reduction measures for new development projects by all
affected cities, so as to avotd plactn9 one city at a competttT~
disadvantage with another,
Rancho Cucamonga is involved in a joint city/county effort led by 5an
Bernardtno Associated Governments (SANBAG) to develop a subregional program
to improve alr quality by reducing vehicle trips. Rancho Cucamonga must
adopt a trlp reduction ordinance, or be subject to South Coast Air Quality
F
9, 1994
Page 2
Manag~nent District (AQMD) regulations. The City Council recognized this,
and on June 16, Igg3 approved resolution 93-126 committing the City to
adopt a local TCM Implementation Program. The proposed ordinances will
provide a trip reduction strategy suited to the City's needs, while
avoiding further regulation by the AQMD. They will also implement the
provisions of the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Air Quality element.
These measures are being adopted by all the Cities and the County within
the SANBAG subregional area. This will prevent any agency from taking an
unfair advantage over the other agencies by not adopting these regulations.
ANALYSIS:
If adopted, these ordinances would amend the Development Code and the
Industrial Area Specific Plan, establishing TCM's as conditions of approval
for new large residential, conmnerctal and industrial development projects
exceeding proposed thresholds. These measures will mitigate air quality
impacts created by the projects as follows:
1. Con~ercial and industrial projects shall provide showers for cyclists
and walkers and provide preferential parking to acconm~odate btcycllst
and carpool/vanpool vehicles. In addition, on-site video conference
facilities shall be provided for office developments with mere than
1000 employees.
2. Multi family projects with 10 or mere units shall provide preferential
parking to acconm~odate btcyclist and carpool/vanpool vehicles.
3. Residential projects with 500 or mere units will provide a
telecommuting center or contribute towards the development of one.
The proposed ordinances include a measure of fl exibil try i n determining
which TCM'S are used to reduce trips. All or part of the TCM's may be
modified under certain circumstances. The ordinances provide that if
implementation is tnfeasible, ineffective or redundant, alternative
measures may be considered. When implemented, such alternative TCM's shall
reduce an equal amount of vehicle trips.
The trip reduction measures will be integrated into the existing
development review process and additional review hoard or process will be
created as a result of this amendment. The ordinances may need to be
amended Or superseded from time to time, in order to meet congestion and
air qualti~y goal s as experience is gained through implementation of trip
reduction and transportation demand management measures.
CONCLUSION:
Adoption of a trip reduction ordinance is necessary to conform to Federal,
State and local air quality mandates. Failure to adopt a trip reduction
ordinance will result in the following:
MARCH Q, 1994
Page 3
I. Loss of State Gas Tax. If an ordinance is not adopted, the City may
lose subvention funds from the State Gas Tax. These ~unds are used by
the City for street maintenance, including the power for traffic
signals and street lights.
2. Loss of local control. The AQMD is direc~y responsible to the
Environmental Protection Agency to impose Federal sanctions if Federal
attainment standards are not met by the South coast Air Basin. The
AQMD has indicated it would further regulate existing businesses if
Cities do not enact their own trip reduction regulations. Such
regulations would be mandatory and include requirements for paid
parking lots and additional gasoline taxes. These additional
regulations would be more onerous and impact the 1 ocal economy more
than the kinds of actions contained in the proposed ordinances. The
ordinances includes actions that will enable trip reduction to occur
without direct regulation to businesses. Through project design and
new facilities which allow people to walk, bicycle and use transit
instead of cars, federal and state mandates to improve air quality can
be met.
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT:
The proposed ordinances would establish procedures to help improve air
qualtty, and therefore the action is categorically exempt from
environmental review provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act
(CEQA) per Section 15308 of the CEQA Guidelines.
Wil!iamj.~,~Neil~'C
City Engineer
~4jO:PAR:ly
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
pLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
Regular Meeting
March 9, 1994
Chairman Barker called the Regular Meeting of the City of Rancho
planning commission to order at 7:21 p.m. The meeting was held in the cod
Chamber at Rancho Cucamonga civic Center, 10500 Civic Center Drive,
Cucamonga, California.
ROLL CALL
COMMISSIONERS= PRESENT= David Barker, Meinz John Melcher,
Peter Tolstoy
ABSENT= Larry McNiel
STAFF PRESENT= Shintu Bose, Deputy City [inset; Brad Bullet, City
Planner~ Ralph Hanson, D~ City Attorney; Dan James,
Senior Civil Engineer; Murphy, Associate Planners
Paul Rougeau, Traffic Iineer; Gail Sanchez, Planning
Commission
ANNOUNCEMENTS
There were no announcements this t~me.
A ROV O
Motion= Moved Lumpp, seconded by Melcher, carried 4-0-1 with McNiel
absent, =o minutes of January 12, 1994.
Motion: by Lumpp, seconded by Tolstoy, carried 3-0-1-1 with McNiel
absent abstaining, to adopt the minutes of the Adjourned Meeting
of 23, 1994, as amended.
Moti Moved by Lumpp, seconded by Tolstoy, carried 3-0-1-1 with McNiel
and Meloher abstaining, to adopt the minutes of the Adjourned Meeting
PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. ENVIRONMENTAL ~V-SBMENT AND DEVELOPRENT CODE AMENDMENT 94-01 - CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA - Consideration of an Environmental Assessment and
Ordinance amending the Develol~ment Code to implement transportat
control measures mandated by State and Federal Air Quality Regulations.
This action will be forwarded to the city Council for final action and
date of the Public Hearing before City council will be separately noticed.
R. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 94-01
- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - Consideration of an Environmental Assessment
and Ordinance amending the Industrial Are· Specific Plan to implement
transp~r~etion control measures mandated by State and Federal Air Quality
Regulations. This action will be forwarded to the city council for final
action and the date of the Public He·ring before City Council will be
separately noticed.
Paul Rougeau, Traffic Engineer, presented the staff report.
commissioner Tolstoy asked if a developer created a specific plan but =hen
sold off the parcels to create smaller pro3ects, if the smaller projects would
then be subject to the talecommunications requirement.
Mr. Rougeau replied that the definition of what constitutes a project is
currently unclear. He said there are even questions regarding the necessary
size of a talecommunications center. He thought such ambiguities could be
answered by administrative adoption of changes to the Transportation Control
Measures (TOM).
Co~eiseioner Tolstoy felt =hat sharp developers will divide projects into
smaller projects in order to avoid having to comply with tougher restrictions.
c~muissioner Melther stated it was his understanding that new projects be~nd
· certain size would be subject to certain restrictions which would result in
less pollutantl than existing projects.
Mr. Rougeau responded that was correct.
Commissioner Melther thought the measures are minuscle in comparison to the
problems.
Mr. Rougeau stated it is hoped each reduction will contribute to meeting the
standards.
Commissioner Melcher felt that the high threshold of 500 residences necessary
for establishing a telec~mnuting center would exempt all residential
development except perhaps · new planned development. He asked if existing
planned camnunAties would have to comply as they continue to build out.
Mr. Rougeau replied' that the intent is to impose the requirements on new
development rather th~n existing develop~e~nt. He thought perhaps in the
future ----liar projects could be Joined together to provide the centers. He
noted that ~ha plan may need to be revised in the future if the air quality
goals are n6~
Chairman Barker asked if there is a specific definition of a project.
Mr. Rougeau replied that separate tracts would probably qualify as · project.
Chairman Barker doubted there would be any project hereafter exceeding 500
units. He asked how successful existing teleco~unicetions centers are.
Planning C~Mm~iselon Mtnutee -2- March 9, 1994
Mr. Rougeau replied that there is controversy over how successful they are.
He noted there is nothing in the plan that indicates how such centers would be
maintained once they are developed.
Brad Bullet, city Planner, stated that the TOM was developed with broad
definiteone in order to allow the Local agencies flexibility to achieve South
Coast Air Quality Management Dis=riot (SCAQMD) regulations. He observed that
SCAQMD had said =hat taLecommuting centers and video conferencing will better
air quality.
Co~z~issioner Melcher questioned the motivation for any one City to address air
pollution. He suggested consideration be given to a per unit mitigation fee
to provide for maintenance and operation of talecommuting centers and he
thought the 500 unit threshold is too high. He asked if an additional review
board would be created to review trip reduction measures.
Mr. Rougeau replied that the measures wou~d be integrated into the existing
development review process and no new review board would be created.
Commissioner Tolstoy asked how the programs will be monitored.
Mr. Rougeau replied that each large employer must report every quarter on the
success of carpooling. He said the new regulations will require the San
Bernardino Associated GOvernments (SA~BAG) to gather enough data to establish
that the number of trips per day has been reduced. He thought the Cities will
report to SA~BAG which will report to SCAQMD.
Cumnissioner Tolstoy asked if the General Dynamics proposal would require a
talecommunications center even though =he area will be parceled into a number
of smaller projects. He thought that since a master plan will be required,
the requirements could be imposed. He asked when definitions would be
generated to determine if master plans would qualify as a pro3ect.
Mr. Bullet said that the General Dynamics Environmental Impact Report (EIR)
addresses air quality.
Commissioner Tolstoy asked how mixed use would be affected.
Mr. Rougeau replied that the Congestion Management Plan calls for adding the
uses together to determine the effect.
commissioner Tolstoy supported the ordinance and intent but felt it should be
tougher.
commissioner Melcher noted that the staff report indicated a county wide
bicycle pl~/I wee to be released in August 1993. He questioned Lf it had been
issued.
Mr. Rougeau was not sure.
Coemissioner Melcher asked if SANBAG had reviewed the effectiveness of the
measures with any independent air quality consultants.
Planning Co~s~lssion Minutes -3- March 9, 1994
~tr. Rougeau replied that the plan had been developed in close coordination
with SC~4D,
Cc~missioner Lumpp asked If ~t had been determined how much each project
should contribute for the teleconu~unicat~ons center.
~r. Rougeau replied that it had not. He said he hoped they could work with
the other Cities to set a uniform amount.
Con~uissioner Lumpp asked if measures other than those shown as Attachment A in
the staff report had been dictated by SCAQ~D.
~r. Rougeau stated that the Core Actions shown in Attachment A were required
to be adopted. He said a listing of recommended actions and a list
discretionar~ items were also available.
Cc~missioner Lumpp felt conditions should not be imposed upon individual
projects if the conditions had already been imposed on a larger project of
which the individual project was only a portion.
Chairman Barker opened the public hearing. There were no public cements and
Chairman Barker closed the hearing.
Motionz Moved by Melther, seconded by Lumpp, to ado~c the resolutions
recc~mending approval of Development Code Amendment 94-01 and Industrial
Specific Plan Amendment 94-01. Notion carried by the following vo~ez
AYESx CONMISSIONERS: B~RF~R, LU~PP, ~t~LCHER, TOLSTOY
NOES ~ CO~4ISS lONERS ~ NON~
~BSENTz CO~4ISSION~!tSz MCNIEL -carried
stablish an answering service in a leased space of 1,790 square feet
multi-tenant industrial building in the General Industrial
District 5) of the Industrial Area Specific Plan, located at the
northeast street and Hermosa Avenue - APNz 209-261-52.
Brad Bullet, City Planner, the staff rapoz..
_cc~_lssioner Lumpp asked if Inland was still in business.
Mr. Bullet replied it was hie understanding they IongeE in operation.
Chairman Barker opened the public hearing. He asked If lcant was
present and there was no response. As there was no other he
closed the hearing.
Ccemissioner Melcher remarked that he did not like to take action on
when applicants are not present.
Planning ~lssion Minutes -4- March 9, 1994
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT CODE
ANENDMENT 94-01, AMENDING CHAPTERS 17.08, 17.10 AND
17.12 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE, REGARDING
TRIP REDUCTION REQUIREMENTS, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN
SUPPORT THEREOF.
A. Recital s.
(i) On March g, 1994, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing with respect to the above-
referenced Development Code Amendment. Following the conclusion of said
public hearing, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 94-16, thereby
recommending that the City Council adopt Development Code Amendment No. 94-01.
Iii) On April 6, lgg4, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
conducted a duly noticed public hearing and concluded said hearing prior to
adoption of this Ordinance.
(lit) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Ordinance
have occurred.
B. Ordinance
The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamenga ordains as follows:
SECTION 1.' This Council hereby specifies and finds that all of the facts
set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of the Ordinance are true and correct.
SECTION 2: This Council hereby finds and certifies that the proposed
amendment has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) of lg70, and determines that the proposed
amendment will establ lsh procedures to help improve air qual try, and therefore
the amendment is categorically exempt from environmental review provisions of
the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), per Section 15061(b)(3) of
the CEQA Guidelines, and further this Councll hereby directs the City Clerk to
file a NOtice of Exemption pursuant to'CEQA Guidelines Section 15062,
regarding this matter.
SECTION 3: Section 17.08,030.E.8 is hereby added to read in words and
figures as loll ows:
CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO.
Page 2
Residential Districts
E, Special Use Regulations . . .
8 Tel ecommmuti Centers St n I e-retail
SECTION 4: Se~ton ~7.~8.0Q0.~.3 o~ ~s he~e~y amended ~o ~ead Tn wor~s and
~ne~a~ Design Guide1 ~nes
~. ~cess/~ula~ton. ~e access ~nd c~u~aUon should be
~eslgned ~o p~ovlde a sa~e and e~cTen~ sys~m ~or vehicles
and pedestrians. Poln~s o~ access shal~ c~ply v~
access reguTa~ons and s~a~l no~ con~c~ w~h o~her ~anned
extsUng access points. T~ poTn~s o~ access sha~l be
~o~ al~ ~ut ~he ~al~est ~es~denUa~ develo~en~s.
c1~ulaUon sys~m should be designed ~ ~duce con~ch
be~een vehicular and pedestrian ~ra~$c, m~nlmtze ~ac~s on
ad~acen~ p~pe~es, c~ne access ~ere possible, and p~v~de
a~equa~e maneuvering areas. Curv~ ~near s~ree~s a~ encouraged
wheneve~ possible. Yeh~culaF and pedestrian ~ra~c sha~ be
separa~e~, ~ ~he ex~en~ poss~bl e, ~h~ugh ~he use
~onUnuous systm o~ ~n~~ pub1 $c and
SECTZON 5: S~Uon ~7.0~0.030.F.7 ~s hereby added ~ ~ad In ~rds and
~19ures as ~oT~ows:
~se ~ul aUons
F. $pectal Use ~gu~ at~ons . .
SECTION G: ~tton 17.10.0H0.¢.1 .c fs hereb~ 8~na~ to read In ~r~s
~ner81 ~slSn ~lael Ines
I. S~te ~an ~stSa .
{c} ~cess/Ct~ulatlon: ~e access and ct~ulatlon of
develo~ent should be aeslgne~ ~ ~mvtde 8 safe and efficient
s~stm, both on and off ~e slY. PotriB of access shall ~e
~estgned tn conromance wlta the C1~ access ~egulattons.
CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO.
Page 3
ctrculation system shall be designed to reduces confltcts
between vehicular and pedestrian traffic, minimize impacts on
adjacent properties, combine circulation and access areas where
possible, and provide adequate maneuvering areas. Points of
access shall not conflict with other planned or existing access
points. Pedestrian walkways shall connect every building with
publtc sidewalks.
SECTION 7: Section 17.10.060.C.l.i is hereby added to read in words and
figures as follows:
General Design Guidelines
c. Guidelines
1. Site Plan Design .
(1) Transit IeproveBents. Transit improvements such as bus
shelters, bus pullouts, and bus pads shall be provided if
deterelned ecessary by the Ct~ Enginer and the Ct~ Iqanner
in consultation with the local transtt prowider.
SECTION 8: Section 17.10.070 Is hereby added to read in words and figures
as ~
Trip Ibductlo.
A. A Elnlmm of me shower factl t1~ accessible to both mo~ and women
shall be provided for persons walking or blcycl tng to tort for each
project ~lch moets the following thresholds:
Ceme~ctel 250,000 square feet
Xndestrlel 325,000 square feet
Office 125o000 square feet
Hotels and Hotels 250 roems
8. Office Parks with 1000 or more employees shall provide on-site
vldee conference fact1 flies.
SECTION 9: Section 17.12.040.C.1, .2, .3 and .4 Is hereby amended to read in
wor~'~d"fTgures as fol 1 ows:
C. ~l:e The following parkin9 requirements are applicable to
sidentis1, coeeerclal and offtce 1 and uses as
designated. ~Adl~ Special stalls shall be closest to the factlily for
which they are designated in order to encourage their use.
1. Handicapped: Those camerctal and office facilities with twenty-five
(2S) or more spaces shall designate two (2) percent or one (1) space.
whichever Is greater, of the total number of stalls for use by the
CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO.
Page 4
handicapped, The designation and destgn shall confom to state
standards.
2. Motorcycle: Cemerctal and office Facilities with twenty-five (25) or
more parking spaces shall provide at least one designated parking area
for use by motorcycles. Developments with over one hundred (100)
spaces shall provide motorcycle parking at the rate of one percent.
Areas delineated for use by motorcycles shall meet standards set forth
in subsection 17.12.030-C-1.
3. Bicycle Storage: Bicycle storage spaces shall be provided in all
multi-family residential projects of more than 10 units, conmnerclal,
office, and industrial districts in accordance with the following:
(a) Minimum spaces equal to 5 percent of the required automobile
parking spaces or g 3 bicycle storage spaces, whichever is
greater. After the first 50 bicycle storage spaces are provided,
additional storage spaces required are 2.5 percent of the required
automobile parking spaces. Warehouse distribution uses shall
provide bicycle storage spaces at a rate of 2.5 percent of the
required automobile parking spaces dth a ~nlB of a 3-bike
rack. In no case shall the total nm~ber of bicycle parking spaces
required exceed 100. Where this results in a fraction of 0.5 or
greater, the nun~er shall be rounded off to the higher whole
number.
4. Car pool s/Yanpools: Off-street parking close to the building shall be
provided for co,~ercial/offtce/tndustrtal facilities ~NiffY rifdYfdf~ at
Xd~f~ the rate of ten (10) percent of the total parking area as
designated for use by car pools and vanpools. If covered, the vertical
clearance shall be no less than 9 feet.
SECTION 10: Section 17.12.040.D is hereby amended to read in words and
figures as follows:
D. ~fefllaTParking Reduction and Perking Structure Provisions. The following
may be required ~ the City Planear or provided at the option of the
developer when applicable to coemercial, residential or office of~-street
parking uses.
Sections 17.12.040.0.1, .2 and .3 remain the same.
SECTION 11: The City Council declares that, should any provision, section,
paragraph, sentence, or word of this Ordinance be rendered or declared tnvaltd
by any final court action in a court of coq~etent Jurisdiction, Or by reason
of any preemptire legislation, the remaining provisions, sections, paragraphs,
sentences, and words of this Ordinance shall remain in full force and effect.
130
CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO.
Page 5
SECTION 12: The City D erk shall certify the adoption of this Ordinance
and shall cause the same to be pub~ tshed within 15 days after its passage at
least once in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin, a newspaper of general
circulation published in the City of Dntario, California, and circulated in
the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California.
131
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC
PLAN AMENDMENT 94-01, AMENDING PART III, REGARDING TRIP
REDUCTION REQUIREMENTS AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT
THEREOF
A. Reci tel s.
(i) On March g, 1994, the Planning Commission of the City of Rencho
Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing with respect to the above-
referenced Industrial Area Specific Plan ~nendment. Following the conclusion
of said public hearing, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 94-17,
thereby recoatmending that the City Council adopt Industrial Area Specific Plan
Amendment No. 94-01.
(ii) On April 6, 1994; the City Council of the City of Rencho Cucamonga
conducted a duly noticed public hearing and concluded said hearing prior to
adoption of this Ordinance.
(lit) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Ordinance
have occurred.
B. Ordinance
The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga ordains as follows:
SECTION 1: This Council hereby specifies and finds that all of the facts
set t~Ft~i'f~'the Recitals, Part A, of the Ordinance are true and correct.
SECTION 2: This Council hereby finds and certifies that the proposed
amendment has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) of 1970, and determines that the proposed
amendment will establ lsh procedures to help improve air quality, and therefore
the amend .ent is categorically exempt from environmental review provisions of
the Calt,ornia Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), per Section 15061(b)(3) of
the CEQA Guidelines, and further this Council hereby directs the City Clerk to
file a Notice of Exemption pursuant to .CEQA Guidelines Section 15062,
regarding this matter.
SECTION 3: The Rencho Cucamenga City Council finds as follows:
a. That the proposed amendment is consistent with the objectives of
the Industrial Area Specific Plan, and the purposes of the District in which
the site is located; and
b. That the proposed amendment will not be detrimental to the
public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or
improvements in the vicinity; and
132
CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO.
Page 2 ~
c. That the proposed amendment is in compllance with each of the
applicable provisions of the Industrial Area Specific Plan; and
d. That- the proposed amendment will not be detrimental to the
objectives of the General Plan or the Industrial Area Spectftc olan.
SECTION 4: Tthe City Counctl of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby
approve"~'T~trlal Area Specific Plan ~mendment 94-01, mending Part III to
read in ~ord and figures as follows:
Part III Section III B.2
B .2. The access and ct rou1 ation of a
development should be designed to
provide a safe and efficient system,
both on and off the site. Points of
access shall be designed in conformance
with the City access regulations. The
circulation system shall be designed to
reduce conflicts between vehicular and
pedestrian traffic, minimize impacts on
adjacent properties, combine circulatton
and access areas where possibl e, and
provide adequate maneuvering areas.
Points of access shall not confl ict with
other planned or existing access points.
Tronstt tmprovme~ts such as bus
shelters, pullonts and pads shall be
f
provided t determined necessary by the
Clt~ Engineer and Clt~ !qonner, tn
consultattoe with the local transit
provtcler.
Part III Section IT! B.7
B.7. Convenient pedestrian circulation shall
be provided throughout all projects to
connect public streets, parking areas
and p'ubl 1c transit facll 1ties with
buildings and pedestrian open spaces.
Part III Section IV
F.2. Requtred parking shall be located on the
same site with the main use of the
butldtng, or on preml ses contiguous
thereto, or tn a location in accordance
with an approved development pl an.
133
CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO.
Page 3
Car peols/vanpools: (If-street parktrig
close to the butldtng shall be provided
for cmmerclal/office/industrial
fact11ties at the rate of 10 percent of
~ total parking area as designated for
use ~ car pools and vanpools. Zf
covered, the vertical clearance shall be
no 1 ess than 9 Pent.
Part III Sectton IV F.4
BIcycle and Other Two
Wheel Vehicular Facilities F.4. Bicycle storage facilities at the rate
of one rack or locker per 30 spaces
(~nfeue of a three-bike rack) shall be
provided within all development and
relate to planned and exlsttng bicycle
trail s in accordance wtth the
Devel opeent Code requirements.
Part III Section IV L
L. VEHI~E TRIP ~DIICTIOII
L.1. A ~nteee of one shower accessible to
both mort and women shall be provided for
persons walking or bicycl fng to wark for
each project ~hich eeets the following
threslml ds:
Comercfal ;50,(XX) square feet
Industrial 3~5,(X)0 square feet
Office 125,(XX) square feet
Hotel s & Notel s 250 roems
L.2. Offtce perks vlth zOO0 employees or more
shall provide on-site vt~eo conference
fact1 tttes.
SECTZON S: The Ct~ Clerk shall certify'to the adoption of this Ordinance
an"d"~T cause the same to be published within fifteen (15) days after
its passage at least once in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletln a newspaper
of general circulation published In the (;l~y of Onhrlo, Cai'tfornla, and
drculated in the Cl~ of P~ncho Cucamonga, Cal lfornle.
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: April 6, 1994
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack L~m; AICP, City Manager
FROM: City Council Public Works Subcommittee
Charles J. Buquet II, Mayor Pro Tem
Diane Williams, Councilmember
SUBJECT UPDATE ON THE PROGRESS OF THE ROUTE 30 FREEWAY
The proposed Route 30 Freeway running east and west through Rancho
Cucsmonga near Highland Avenue has been a part of the City's planned
circulation master plan since the adoption of the City's first General Plan
in 1981. A hierarchy of local streets has been arranged in conjunction with
the anticipated freeway corridor. Our General Plan, as shown on the
attached map, arranged land uses in response to the freeway corridor.
Over the past several years, much of this area has been developed. Traffic
modelinE has forecast that Routs 30 is needed to relieve traffic congestion on
the City's local streets. The proper development of the City as well as the
region depends upon the future construction of the freeway.
Route 30 has long been an important part of the regional trsnAportation in
and through Rancho Curarnonga and the other cities along its routs. As
such, the freeway is now being carried by San Bernardino Associated
Governments (SANBAG) and Caltrans as a major project, with
preliminary design occurring now. Preliminary plans call for a full
freeway with offram s at Carnelian, Archibald, Haven, Milliken and
future Day Creek Bo~evard. The msln effort for SANBAG to date has been
to prepare an Environme . Impact. Report/Statement, satisfying both
Federal and- State laws. ~IIt/EIS was originally scheduled to take two
years, but has been delayed several times, the latest for expanded historic
property surveys.
Freeway design and construction involves c~ordination among many
agencies. These agencies include Caltrana, SANBAG, Los Angeles County
Transportation Commission (LACTC), seven cities from La Verne to San
Bernardino, Los Angeles and San Bernardino Counties, And,.the Federal
Highway Administration (FHWA). Preparation of the EIRfEIS has
involved many more groups, agencies and individuals.
A large project such as Routs 30, goes through many stsps after selection of
the freeway routs to completion. The first stsp is developing a series of
pre]irnlnary alignments, elevations (heights and depths), intsrchanges and
drainage studies necessary to complets the EIRfEIS. Only after the
EIR/EIS is certified can right-of-way, other than for hardship or protsction,
be purchased and final detailed design work take place.
Throughout this process, many meetings have been held among the
various agencies. Many more will be needed to complets the project.
Rancho Cucamonga has been involved in nnmerous meetings, and the
extent of this involvement is shown on the attached list. The City is
continually working with Caltrans and SANBAG to discuss preliminary
design issues involving grading studies, local street/connections/access
historic properties, and drainage. One result of this has been to overcome
objections of the FHWA to the interchange at Camelin Street. This
intsrchange is critical to local circulation in orde~ to minimize traffic
congestion along 19th Street and Archibald Avenue without it. The City,
SANBAG and Caltrans had to demonstrate via, w~rherous studies and
models the positive impact this intsrchange would have to the local
circulation patterns in and around the area. "
The City has taken a leadership role on this project thraugh' the Rofits 30
Fox~m which was established in early 1992 to coordinats the efforts of all
the cities along the route in a continning dialogue with Caltrans and
SANBAG at the policy making level. The Fon~m, consisting of local electsd
officials has fostered' cooperation between all the Cities along the freeway
routs and both Los Angeles and San Bernar~llno Counties.
Forum participants have drafted a Joint Powers Agreement for the
fo~Ation of an agency to develop an interrelated theme for landscaping,
bridges, soundwalls, and signage design' along with a maintenance
agreement ~with CaltranA~ While not currently in the agreement, the Joint
Powers. AZ~ncy colild ~timately provide a funding source for
enhfncomeate to the freewa~ that would not otherwise be provided in the
project. This agreement is before the various City Councils at this time.
Another major issue being addressed by the Forlorn is a proposed truck
restriction. With the cooperation of all the cities along the route, 'i~ may be
possible to ban. truck traffic thereby reducing noise and extending roadway
surface lif~.- This could have a positive impact on rush hour traffic and
adjacent Iahd, uses. . ·
.~:
The City went all the way to Congress to insure the Carnelian offramp as
included in the original freeway design. Caltrans proposed eliminating the
ramp. However, the Council, working with Congressman Brown and
SANBAG was able to completely turn the issue in our favor. The ramp will
be installed with the original freeway construction wi~out added cost to the
City. As stated above, traffic on 19th Street and Archibald would be severely
impacted without the Carnelian ramp.
Originally the Federal Highway Administration declared Rancho
Cucamonga a rural area which meant our Comrnnnlty would ouly have
offramp spacing at 2 miles. This would have eliminated several of our
offramps. Council and SANBAG, with our legislators, were able to inaure
an "urban standard" with offramp spacing at one mile in Rancho
Cucnmonga. This insured access to the freeway would correspond with the
General Plan circulation goals. Without this concession the City would
have been left with as few as three interchanges severely crippling
circulation and impacting local streets..
The Council has also been active in assuring the City's historical and
environment amenities are protected. A prime example is the Maloof
property where the City is working with the property owners, SANBAG and
Caltrana to satisfy the needs of all involve&
The Environmentel Impact Report/Statement CEIR/EIS) is being drafted
and is expected to be completed in January 1995. This environmental work
centers on several historic preporties and on areas of endangered plant
species. In Panclio. Cucamonga, the process has resulted in considerable
mitigation for impacts on such proporties as the Maloof Studio, Goerlitz
Wedding Chapel and the Mueller proparty.
The Preliminary design of Route 30's grading/elevation has been completed
only in the Hermosa Avenue to Haven Avenue reach and designers are still
studying alternatives in the area of Haven Avenue to Day Creek Boulevard
to achieve a lower height ofi~pbankment there.
Of the 5.5 miles through PanchO Cucamonga, 2.2 miles or 40 percent, are
depressed. These reaches are from west of Carnelian Avenue to west of
Hermosa Avenue and from west of Etiwanda Avenue to east of East
Avenue. -/
A fully depressed freeway may he to~-hnlcally possible and could double the
cost according to Caltrana estimates. One major ~!i~forenco in cost is in the
need for retaining walls, approximately 11,000 feat in Pancho Cucsmonga.
About half that distance would involve walls 30 to 65 feet high. The only
viable alternative to retaining walls is to slope or grade the freeway
embAnl~ment requiring additional properties and the removal of additional
homes in these areas.
Another major issue is the drainage conduits for major creeks such as Alta
Loma Chsnnel, Day Creek and Deer Creek. Flood protection for the
freeway requires culverts very much larger than those in place now. Very
long drain pipes in north/south streets to drain the lowered section would
also be required, disrupting a larger area needed for construction. These
drainage issues are still in need of further review. As more detailed design
is completed in these areas, beth CaltrAna and Flood Control will have to be
involved.
According to Caltrans and SANBAG the first pertion of the freeway, the
15/30 Interchnngs, iS scheduled to begin construction in 1996 or 1997. The
State wants to build the ultimate configuration for the inte~hAnge, which
would connect into Highland Avenue east of Etiwanda Avenue. Currently
we understand the Environmental Statement will not be complete until at
the earliest January 1995. AP~r that, at least two years will be needed for
right-of-way purchases and design. Construction could not begin until
sometime in 1997 at the ~. No discussions have been made on
phasing of this construction.
CONTINUING MEETINGS
There is a public meeting scheduled for May 10, 1994, at the Windrows
School to infornl and receive input regarding the freeway, preliminary
design in the City. Other meetings of ~-hls type will be held to inaur~ public
input is provided throughout the design process.
Respectfully submitted,
Dians Wffi~ma
Attachmant
· a '~ I . LEGEND
LA VrdiNE ,4r//4;r RANC.O CUCAMONGA J ii:i{4!i{iii}ii~:!i~iii:i~ ELEVATED PROFILE
. . ~> ~':PRESSED PROFILE
e MIXED FLOW
TERCHANGE
iO FUTURE MIXED FLOW
FUTURE HOV
INTERCHANGE
RANCHO CUGAMONGA FONTANA FREEWAY TO FREEWAY
;4~_../~ ~:~p~~~ INTERCHANGE
i ,~,,m,~,, CONSTRAINED R/W
I : ,,,,,~,o 'FULL
raN. TO SAN IiEmeAmmo FREEWAY
~ --'- ALTERNATIVE
"'C, 4-7-92
MEETING HZSTORY - ROUTE 30 FREENAY
AT RANCHO CUCANONGA
These Meetings Open to Pub1 tc
PUBL ZC POL ZCY MAKERS TECHNICAL STAFF
3-93 Public Hearfng Forum meetlngs: Neetlngs among staff
at Rancho Cucamonga at Rancho Cucamonga
Ctvtc Center Ctty Hall Staff members of Ctty,
Htst. ' Impacts Feb. Mar. - '94 Ca1 trans, SANBAG, (open
Apt., June, Aug., to the publlc) other
9-91 Publlc Heartng Oct., Dec. - '93 cltles, consultants.
at Charley Coll ege
Apt. to Dec. - '92 1994 - 4
EZS 19~..3 - 13
(at C1aremont also) PolIcy Group: 1992 - 13
Jan. '91 1991- 9
8-91 Hap showtrig at Oct,, Dec, - °90
Charley College and
RCNC (at LaVerne & Rt. 30 Corrtdor Group
Rtal to el so) Steerlng Cornrot tree:
These groups met
8-91 Press conference throughout the 1980' s
at Rancho Cucamonga PuN tc and HomeownerS
Clvtc Center
1980's - Pub1 fc Heartrigs
on A1 ternattves Analysfs
fn varlous ctttes
TECHNICAL MEETINGS ZNVOLVXNG POLZCYMAKERS
Aug., Oec. - '93
Jan., July - '92
Aug. - '91
SR-30 AVOIDANCE ALTERNATIVE SUMMARY
4(0 Neams: Avok mce ^ckatkma
Cross Slmel IAeasum C~_~ · Com.._-~nl.s
I Pilzm-Piifl Halll' Towlie Aveflue None mquked $0 No R/W Iml)MI
2 bald Park bid Avenue Retakdag Wadl $1.0M Land Swap
310 LF x H=32'& 130 LF x H=4' Retaining WaIaI250K
3 6Uaight Heuse Eraadd Avenue nelakdng Wal S600K House velsus I~'opedy?
kiP/ 700 LF x H-14'
4 Blughinlo Noule litdin Hill BIrd. Rellklklo Wit $15OK Project Alternative
200 LF x H-12'
6 Pjlzef Ranch Paldun Atl~llle SOlidlady RelllglvlNml 124.5M 97 Resld~ls
144xthelly .Relli~nme~ $H.SM 65 ReddenIs, I Business
6 Elllid Avevie Euclid Atenee Cut & Coyel .Box S5.0M Plolile 8' LOwel
7 R.T. Nilon ltouse Euclid Avenue Re~ Wldl STIX)K Project Altentalive
460LFxH-20'
8 F, dmldn House Eucld Avenue None feed $0 No R/W Impact
9 Mllool&GoellilzHoesel A/chil~JdAvellue 6ouihedyRell0fliNifil ISO.0M
,,, Nodhedy P_-~_--s~}falvlfil 140.0M 129 Residents. 1 aus~ness
10 Isle House Etjwluda Avemje Southedy RealJ0mnefit $14.0M 36 .~.~Gal Ufdt8
,,,,,, Nodhedy P;~-: . S9.5M 1 e Residentjal Units
11 Eliwandm Windbleaks Easl Avenue Relllm'~ We~ Sl .OM bye E'~_=_~ TIes?
1925 LF x I~10'
·It/w tom so I~e ve.l~l by Caduans A/W Del~lmeal.
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: March 29, 1994
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: Charles J. Buquet II, Mayor Pro Tem
SUBJECT: UPDATE ON SCAG'S REGIONAL COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
As a follow up to the Regional Comprehensive Plan memo provided to the City Council
and Planning Commission on February 9, 1994, SCAG's Regional Council met March 3
and 4, 1994 and extended the time for adoption of its Regional Comprehensive Plan
(RCP) for 30 days. Originally the Plan was scheduled for adoption April 4, 1994. SCAG
has extended adoption for another 30 days and will begin reviewing the components of
the RCP beginning May 5, 1994.
Those components that will be reviewed May 5, 1994 will be the Regional Mobility,
Growth, and Economic Elements. In addition, the EIR will also be reviewed May 5,
1994. SCAG has indicated that the remaining components will be reviewed June through
December of this year. SCAG will also provide a "calendar" for this extended RCP
review following its May 5, 1994 meeting.
The Boardmembers of SANBAG, of which I serve as this City's Delegate, have
consistently rejected the RCP in its current form. The RCP continues to be closely
tracked by the SANBAG Boardmembers and is scheduled to be on SANBAG's agenda
each month.
As the City's SANBAG Delegate, I have scheduled a meeting with the Planning
Commission Chair and Vice Chair for Thursday, March 31, 1994 to provide this update
and to keep the Planning Commission apprised of the progress of the RCP.
Respectfully Submitted,
Mayor Pro Tem